5402 001R78105
EPA
ADP SURVEY
NATIONAL COMPUTER CENTER
Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina
-------
\
8 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
f Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
December 8, 1978
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: ADP Survey for EPA 1980's System Acquisition and
Implementation Program
TO: All EPA Division Directors
Samuel C. Brown, Directoi
National Computer Center
FROM: Samuel C. Brown, Director ^ /> x» x?
In April 1978, Mr. Douglas M. Costle chartered the
1980's ADP System Acquisition and Implementation Program
(SAIP). A copy of Mr. Costle's letter and the charter are
attached for your information and guidance. The SAIP has
been staffed and plans are now being made to implement the
overall charter.
One very important task in the SAIP is a determination
of ADP systems requirements and usage on the division level.
We at the National Computer Center need to know your pro-
jected requirements for the period 1981 through 1990 so that
we can ensure that our hardware and system capabilities are
adequate to meet these requirements. To accomplish this, we
have enclosed a survey package to be completed by your
division. The survey addresses four areas: documentation
assessment, analysis of security/privacy/freedom-of-
information requirements, functional characterization of
current ADP usage, and evaluation of current ADP development
status. The package consists of several sets of forms, with
instructions and support materials.
The survey package attached is unique to your division,
based upon your ADP responsibilities and usage. All divi-
sions are required to prepare an Account Code Assignment
Survey Form. In addition, if you have responsibility for
software systems or other computer programs, then forms are
enclosed to describe that software. Refer to the General
Instructions Section of the survey package for detailed '
information concerning the particular forms required from
your division.
-------
In addition to completing the enclosed forms, we would
also appreciate your comments regarding your projected ADP
requirements in the following areas:
• ADP needs that are not currently being met.
• ADP resources and procedures that may be required
by future projects/programs.
• Questions or comments pertaining to the 1980's ADP
System Acquisition and Implementation Program.
Members of the SAIP staff will contact you in the near
future to resolve any immediate problems you may have and to
answer your questions.
I cannot emphasize too strongly the importance of this
survey. The data we receive will help determine the acquisi-
tion of the 1980's data processing system, and errors and
omissions can result in major problems during the procure-
ment cycle. For this reason, you are requested to personally
support this effort and to ensure that the survey results
are as complete and accurate as possible. Please call Bob
Denny at FTS 629-3751 if you have any problems.
The target date for completion of the survey is
January 29, 1979. I would greatly appreciate receiving the
survey material on or before that date.
Your assistance in this effort is truly appreciated,
and I assure you that we will make every effort to procure
the most reliable and cost-effective system available for
your use.
11
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
APR 1 7 1978
THE ADMINISTRATOR
MEMORANDUM
To: Assistant Administrators
Regional Administrators
Subject: Establishment of Program Manager for 1980's ADP
System Acquisition and Implementation Program
EPA is now beginning a major system acquisition program that will
provide for our ADP needs in the 1980's under the policy that I
established last July. I have designated Mr. Samuel Brown of our
central ADP management organization the Program Manager who will lead
this effort.
We must press this acquisition for two reasons: (1) The IBM
contract (COMNET) that provides half of our computing resources will
expire at the end of 1980*s and (2) The remainder of the computer-
resource (UNIVAC-RTP) is expected to reach the end of its technological
usefulness during the early 1980's.
The ADP System Acquisition and Implementation Program is designed
to acquire and implement the ADP resources (hardware/software/
telecommunications/contract personnel) to satisfy all EPA ADP require-
ments for at least ten years from implementation beginning in the early
1980's. This acquisition is both very important and very difficult.
Sam Brown, the Program Manager, will need your full cooperation and
support. Sam will report to me at specific milestones during the
program and I will personally be the selection official on this procure-
ment.
You will have to pay especially close attention to the conversion of
your information systems from the two present computer centers to the new
system. GSA will only allow information systems that meet certain
standards to be considered in the selection of new ADP resources. We must
make sure our systems fit GSA's criteria to ayoil potentially serious
conflicts and delays. We also need to get/mr RFP's out soon. Sam will
get back to you to define what is required; in detail.
i. Cootie
Attachment
ill
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
1981-1990 ADP System Acquisition and Implementation Program
Program Manager
CHARTER
1. Purpose; The purpose of this charter is to establish the Program
Manager for the Environmental Protection Agency's 1981-1990 ADP
System Acquisition and Implementation Program. The Program
Manager is Mr. Samuel C. Brown. This charter will outline the
authority and responsibilities of the Program Manager and describe
the relationships of the Program Manager to other organizations/
participants, which will be supporting this ADP Acquisition
Program.
2. Background; During 1977, the Agency performed a workload analysis
of EPA. The current workload (1977) was analyzed and then fore-
casted for the years 1981, 1985, and 1990. The study is documented
in the "Environmental Protection Agency's 1981-1990 ADP Requirements
Study" dated December 14, 1977. The costs of the EPA ADP program
are projected as an eight percent average annual growth from present
and thus are to be from $25 million to $50 million annually during
the 1980's. This includes the computer hardware, operating system
and necessary software packages, telecommunications network, conver-
sion effort and the facilities management contractor to operate the
computers.
3. Mission; The Program Manager is administratively established under
the Assistant Administrator for Planning and Management (AA, 0PM).
The Program Manager shall provide management and technical direction
to accomplish the orderly acquisition and implementation of ADP
resources to satisfy EPA requirements for at least ten years
beginning in the early 1980's. The program life extends until
conversion from existing computer centers have been completed.
4. Program Manager Functions; Subject to existing EPA Orders,
Regulations, and Procedures, the Program Manager is responsible for:
A. Organization, planning, directing, and controlling all aspects
of the acquisition and implementation program for the new ADP
resources.
B. Continually reviewing and updating all 1981-1990 ADP mission
requirements and determining impact on the program.
IV
-------
C. Ensuring that a comprehensive System Acquisition and Imple-
mentation Plan, including a program management plan with
milestones based on authorized resource levels and a program
budget, is developed and maintained throughout the life of
the program.
D. Implementing management actions which result in the completion
of all program actions necessary to acquire and implement the
ADP resources needed in the 1980's.
E. Appointing a project officer for all program contracts.
F. Assuring that interfacing and participating organizations
plan and execute assigned tasks and responsibilities in a
timely and cost-effective manner.
G. Managing the large-scale conversion effort including directions
for preparation of agency information systems for conversion
and the implementation process on the new ADP resources.
5. Responsibility and Authority: The Program Manager is delegated
complete responsibility and authority for management and successful
execution of the 1981-1990 ADP System Acquisition and Implementation
Program. This includes the following:
A. Take the necessary management action to ensure that functions,
as described in Paragraph 4, are performed.
B. Determine and supply to the Assistant Administrators and
Regional Administrators the actions and support necessary from
their areas.
C. Serve as the System Acquisition Executive for Assistant Admin-
istrator for Planning and Management. In cases requiring
Administrator's approval the Program Manager will make the
recommendation to the Administrator, EPA, based on his technical
evaluation with cost and other factors considered.
D. Establish Interagency Support Agreements and internal EPA
organizational support agreements.
E. Serve as the single point of EPA contact with external
organizations.
F. Exercise technical and administrative supervision of all people
supporting the 1981-1990 ADP System Acquisition Program includ-
ing permanent, temporary, and intermittent personnel assigned
to the program from supporting organizations. This includes
authority to approve official personnel actions for permanent
personnel within the authorized staffing level of the Program
Manager staff.
-------
I
I
G. Administers program funds from the approved program budget.
I
H. Issues EPA correspondence and performs the liaison necessary
both internal and external to EPA to ensure accomplishment of
program objectives.
I. Reports to the EPA Administrator at appropriate milestones.
Date:
Date:
M7?
_Reviewed by:
Approved
William Drayto
Assis
f orx'Plaimirig'and Managamen
VI
-------
Table of Contents
Section
INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1
ACCOUNT CODE ASSIGNMENT SURVEY FORM 2
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM 3
SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT FORM 4
SYSTEM EVALUATION FORM 5
SECURITY/PRIVACY/FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION FORM 6
MINICOMPUTER USAGE FORM 7
REFERENCE MATERIALS 8
EPA ADP Systems/Activities List and
System/Activity Description 8
Detailed Division Account Code Information 8
Note: Multiple sets of this package are provided to
facilitate comprehensive response for all divi-
sion ADP responsibilities.
VI1
-------
INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of this survey is to collect data for the EPA 1980's
ADP procurement, to evaluate software system conversion require-
ments, and to establish an ADP development cycle for EPA. The
following forms are enclosed to support this survey:
Account Code Assignment Survey Form
General System/Activity Characterization Form
System Documentation Assessment Form
System Evaluation Form
Security/Privacy/Freedom-of-Information Form
Minicomputer Usage Form
The following table indicates those forms which must be prepared
by your division, based on your division's ADP usage and respon-
sibilities:
\
I
FORM REQUIRED
DIVISION ADP RESPONSIBILITY & USAGE
-P
C
Q)
•H
CO
co
QJ
T3 g
O M
U O
fa
-P
C >i
3 0)
O >
U M
O 3
< CO
-p
•H E
> ^
•H O
-P fa
O
< c
X. O
E-H
QJ -P
-P (0
CO N
>i-H
CO M
(U
.H -P
OJ O
V-i (0
CU M
C (0
Q) ^
O CJ
O
-H
-P
(0
-P
C
Q)
O 4->
0 C
Q Q)
0) CO
4J (U
CO CO
>t CO
co <;
g
M
O
C
O
•H
-p
w
§
JJ
CO
>1
CO
O
id
cu
cu
M g
fa M
X. O
>ifa
O
(0 C
> O
•^ -H
}-l -p
Oi (0
X g
>i H
-P O
•rH IW
n c
0 M
U I
ty u-i
co o
o
fa
cu
CO
D
5-1
CD
-P
g
o
u
•H
c
NCC/WCC Account Code Usage
X
Each ADP system for which division has
responsibility
X
X
X
Each ADP functional activity, apart
from systems, in which this division
engages
X
Private programs/data bases used with
systems which are not the responsibil-
ity of this division
X
X
Miscellaneous programs not significant
in above categories
X
Table 1. Forms Requirements
1-1
-------
It is essential that the enclosed forms account for all division
computer usage (including minicomputers) at NCC and WCC, and for
all software systems and other computer programs (including
those for minicomputers) within your division that are used at
these two computer centers.
ACCOUNTING FOR COMPUTER USAGE. A complete list of active
account codes for your division is included as Table 2. The
account code descriptions, systems manager's names, and loca-
tions, with other relevant account code information, are in-
cluded in the Reference Materials section of this survey pack-
age. Every account code listed in Table 2 must be entered on
the Account Code Assignment Survey Form. The account codes
will be grouped by the systems and activities for which they
are used. For instance, if a division has 12 active account
codes that are used for various types of processing with the
SAROAD system, then SAROAD will be entered as the system, and
all 12 account codes will be listed next to it. Further de-
tailed instructions are attached to the Account Code Assignment
Survey Form.
The account code list in Table 2 should be returned with the
survey results. If any changes to the list are necessary, they
should be made along with a note indicating why the change is
required.
ACCOUNTING FOR SYSTEMS AND OTHER COMPUTER PROGRAMS. Table 3
contains a list of systems which are the responsibility of your
division. This table also provides a list of activities to
account for computer programs which are not part of a system.
Both lists may have to be extended. If your division has respon-
sibility for systems or activities not listed in Table 3, then
they must be added to the list. If there is a small number of
programs left in the division's responsibility and these pro-
grams do not appear to fit in the systems/activities groups, or
appear insignificant for reporting purposes, they may be
grouped and reported in a "miscellaneous" category. The var-
ious reporting forms will be completed as follows:
a. The General System/Activity Characterization Form is
the reporting medium for systems,activities,and the
miscellaneous category. One of these forms must be
filled out for each system, activity, and miscella-
neous category.If your division uses a system which
is the responsibility of another division, but the
usage includes programs or data bases which are the
responsibility of your division, then this form must
be completed for these programs also. The entire
form must be completed for each system. For report-
ing functional activities or the miscellaneous cate-
gories, certain questions may not be applicable and
1-2
-------
may be so indicated. At a minimum, the name, descrip-
tion, documentation, responsible personnel, interfaces,
and all program summary and applicable data base sum-
mary data must be filled in.
b. A System Documentation Assessment Form, System Eval-
uation Form,and Security/Privacy/Freedom-of-Informa-
tion Form must be completed for each system.
c. A Minicomputer Usage Form must be completed for each
minicomputer.
The division's total set of systems, activities, private pro-
grams in support of other systems, and the miscellaneous cate-
gory will comprise categories for system/activity names on the
Account Code Assignment Survey Form. Additional categories
will be systems used by the division for which the division has
no responsibility. You will supply this information.
REFERENCE MATERIALS. The Reference Materials Section includes
detailed division account code information and a list of EPA
ADP systems and definitions of candidate activities to aid in
completion of both the Account Code Assignment Survey Form and
the General System/Activity Characterization Form.
If assistance is required in responding to this survey, or if
additional forms are needed, please call Bob Denny, FTS 629-3751.
Please return the completed survey to the following address:
Mr. Bob S. Denny
Environmental Protection Agency
80's ADP SAIP (MD-18)
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
1-3
-------
ACCOUNT CODE ASSIGNMENT SURVEY FORM
Instructions
Each division will complete and return one Account Code
Assignment Survey Form. (One form may consist of several
pages.)
This form will account for all division ADP usage of the
NCC and WCC computers. Systems' names and functional
activities will be listed in the left-hand column, and
ADP account codes in the right-hand column grouped next
to the appropriate system or activity. Following is an
example of a completed form:
I
ACCOUNT CODE ASSIGNMENT SURVEY FORM
SYSTEM/ACTIVITY NAME
ENERGY DATA SYSTEM
MODEL PLANT STUDY SYSTEM
SAROAD (PRIVATE PROGRAMS)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
SIMULATION AND MODELING
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCOUNT CODES
90545PPS3, 80545AR3C, FMR4,
CCD3, KML3
90545MPCD, 90575K3LL, 90575ARDC
90545SROD, 90545PPO1
90545SATC, 90575STCL, KLS3,
ROST (30%)
90535SM04, 90535SMHP, ROST (70%)
90545SIMC, 90575JUNK
3. The complete list of system/activity names will be com-
prised of:
a. Systems for which the division is responsible.
b. Systems which the division uses, but for which the
division has no maintenance/development responsi-
bility.
c. Functional activities in which the division is
engaged. (These are major activities not related
to an EPA system.)
2-1
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d. Systems which the division uses and for which the
division has no maintenance or development responsi-
bility, but has a set of private programs or data
bases to use with that system.(Indicate private pro-
grams shown in the above example).
e. Miscellaneous - this is an acceptable category for a
small group of programs which either do not fit in
any other category or are not significant for individual
reporting.
4. If an account code is used for more than one of the listed
systems/activities, then it will be listed with each and
the appropriate percentage of use indicated as shown in
the example. Account codes representing different func-
tions within a system (maintenance, development, data base
update, etc.) will all be grouped next to the system name.
5. The list of current active account codes for your division
is included as Table 2. Table 3 lists the systems for
which your division is responsible, along with a list of
possible functional activities. Additions to these lists
should be made as necessary to reflect the actual division
work. All account codes in Table 2 must be accounted for
in this survey form. A list of additional EPA systems and
auxiliary data (description, manager's name, user names,
etc.) for account codes is provided in the Reference
Materials, Section 8, along with a set of definitions for
functional activities. The reference materials are pro-
vided to aid in filling out this survey form and to serve
as a checklist for completeness.
2-2
-------
ACCOUNT CODE ASSIGNMENT SURVEY FORM
PREPARED BY.
TITLE
DATE COMPLETED
ORG. NAME 8 CODE.
SYSTEM/ACTIVITY NAME
ACCOUNT CODES
2-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DIVISION ACCOUNT CODES ORG 90540009
RTF 90540CRCT
RTF 90540PPS5
RTF 90540RSUP
WCC CSCC
WCC DCR5
WCC PPS5
WCC SMR5
WCC S211
WCC WPR5
WCC RSUP
WCC WFNK
WCC MSIS
Table 2. Division Account Codes
1-4
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DIVISION SYSTEM LIST - ORG 90540009
CIVIL RIGHTS SYSTEM
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
(OTHER)
CANDIDATE ACTIVITIES
Definitions of these activities are contained in the Reference
Materials Section.
o High Order Language Program Development and Maintenance
o Language Processor Development and Maintenance
o Procedure Development and Maintenance
o Operating System Modification; Enhancement and Evaluation
o Utility Development and Maintenance
o Data Base Management Program Development
o Data Presentation Program Development
o Statistical Analysis
o Simulation and Modeling
o User Assistance and Training
o EPA Operations, Planning and Management Support
o (Other)
o (Other)
Table 3. Division System List & Functional Activities
1-5
-------
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM
Instructions
A separate set of these forms will be completed for:
a. Each EPA software system for which your division
has responsibility.
b. Each ADP functional activity, apart from systems,
in which your division engages.
c. Division owned/maintained private programs and data
bases used with systems which are not the responsi-
bility of your division.
d. A miscellaneous category which may include a small
number of programs that do not fit in the above
categories, or which are not significant in them-
selves .
A list of systems for which your division has responsi-
bility is presented in Table 3. A list of candidate
functional activities is also presented in that table.
The activities are defined in the Systems/Activities sub-
section of the Reference Materials section. Additions to
the lists should be made as necessary to represent the
division's work.
When the General System/Activity Characterization Form is
prepared for a category of software other than a system,
some of the questions may not be applicable. In this
case, mark the question "N.A." At a minimum, the name,
description, documentation, responsible personnel, inter-
faces, and all program summary and applicable data base
questions should be answered. Other questions should be
answered where possible.
3-1
-------
I
I GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM
I
PREPARED BY DATE COMPLETED.
TITLE ORG. NAME & CODE.
1. NAME & ACRONYM OF SYSTEM/ACTIVITY:
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PURPOSE OR FUNCTION OF THIS SYSTEM/ACTIVITY:
3. CONGRESSIONAL ACTS/LAWS RESULTING IN THIS SYSTEM:
4. ZERO BASE BUDGET REFERENCE. IF AVAILABLE:
5. SYSTEM MANAGER. CHIEF ANALYST. OR OTHER RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL:
NAME TITLE ORG LOCATION PHONE
I 6. SYSTEM LOCATION: ^WCC D NCC DoTHER (NAME)
IF SYSTEM LOCATION IS OTHER THAN WCC OR NCC. GIVE COMPUTER TYPE:
I
I
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
I
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM
7. SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION SUMMARY
(Page 2 of 7)
REFERENCE
DOCUMENT NAME,
NUMBER & DATE
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TYPE DOCUMENT
o.
UJ
1-
USERS MANUAL
DESIGN DOCUMENT
SOURCE CODE
UJ
u
UJ
1-
z
i
cc
UJ
X
1-
o
OTHER
WHEN
PRODUCED
BEFORE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
DURING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
H-
i
a.
AFTER SYSTEM DEVELO
PURPOSE
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
8. ARE PASSWORDS USED TO PROTECT DATA ACCESS?
.•0YES DNO NUMBER OF PASSWORDS:
9. OTHER SECURITY:
10. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER SYSTEMS/ACTIVITIES (CHECK SHARED ITEM):
SYSTEM NAME OR ACRONYM
USE FILES PROVIDE FILES COMMON COMMON
FOR INPUT FOR OTHER SYSTEM DATA BASE PROGRAM
n a
a
a
a
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM
11. ADDITIONAL RELATIONSHIPS:
(Page 3 of 7}
,12. NUMBER OF MODIFICATIONS EXPECTED DURING SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE:
DMANY (25 OR MORE)
DFEW (LESS THAN 25)
DNONE-
13. LIFE EXPECTANCY OF SYSTEM (EXPECTED ADDITIONAL LIFE FROM PRESENT)
DLONG (9 YEARS OR MORE) DMEDIUM (2 YEARS-S YEARS)
DSHORT (LESS THAN 2 YEARS)
14. NUMBER OF USERS (PEOPLE):
DMOST (100 OR MORE)
DFEW (1-10)
15. MAINTENANCE METHOD:
DSUPPLIER (VENDOR)
DMANY (51-99)
DSOME (11-50)
^GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR
16. INPUT/OUTPUT DEVICES REQUIRED BY SYSTEM/ACTIVITY - CHECK ALL APPLICABLE:
DISK
DRUM
7-TRACK
MAG TAPE
9-TRACK
MAG TAPE
KEYBOARD
CRT
LINE
PRINTER
CARD
READER
PUNCH
OCR
PLOTTER
17. RUN FREQUENCY - CHECK ALL APPLICABLE:
DAILY
WEEKLY
MONTHLY
SEMI-
ANNUALLY
ANNUALLY
OTHER
(SEE COMMENTS)
18. OPERATING MODE - INDICATE PERCENTAGE USAGE OF EACH MODE:
BATCH
I
INTERACTIVE
PROCESSING
I
INTERACTIVE
ON-LINE
INQUIRY
I
ON-LINE
DATA BASE UPDATE
y
10
REAL-TIME
%
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-4
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL SfSTEM/UTIVITV CUUCKUUTIIII FORM
(Page 4 of 7)
19. USER PROFILE - SHOW PERCENTAGE OF USE BY EACH:
MISSION-ORIENTED USER
PROGRAMMER
MANAGER
20. DATA BASE ACTIVITY LEVEL:
DHIGH MAINTENANCE LEVEL
MAINTENANCE REQUIRED
EPA RESEARCH ANALYST
DATA INPUT TECHNICIAN
GLOW MAINTENANCE LEVEL
21. IS THIS SYSTEM A CANDIDATE FOR 1980's CONVERSION OR REPROGRAMMING?
JYES DNO
WHICH WOULD YOU RECOMMEND?
DMINIMUM CONVERSION EFFORT
22. IDENTIFY TERMINALS USED:
RJE
INTERACTIVE
OTHER
DTOTAL REDESIGN
NUMBER
LOCATION
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-5
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL SWEM/MWIH CHARACTERIZATION FORM
PROGRAM SUMMARY DATA
(Page 5 of 7)
ENTER NUMBER OF MODULES (PROGRAMS, PROCEDURES, ETC.) OF EACH INDICATED SIZE AND TYPE
COMPRISING THIS SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY:
LINES OF
SOURCE CODE
0 - 200
201 - 500
501 - 2000
OVER 2000
LANGUAGE
-Jco
O LU
LU o:
3
O Q
< LU
> O
--O
•Z.CC.
CO
LU
CC
1 ^
00
~3 LU
O
so
oace
—i Ou
—
09 Q-
z z
Q; Q^
CC QC
oo
U- U.
p_
1
oeio.
^ _J
00
12} OQ
00
00
LLJ
•"^
Q
< LU
Q.O
_ia:
a.
co
IT
o
CO
CO
ce
LU
5
PEAK MEMORY REQUIREMENT FOR THIS SYSTEM/ACTIVITY =
TYPICAL JOB RUN-TIME:
BYTES OF MEMORY.
DECIMAL
PEAK RUN-TIME:
INDICATE PERCENTAGE OF THIS SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CODE FULFILLING EACH OF THE INDICATED
FUNCTIONS:
FUNCTION
I/O ORIENTED
PROGRAMS
DATA MANIPULATION
SORT/MERGE
REPORT GENERATION
PLOTTING
GRAPHICS
PERCENTAGE
COMPUTATION
ORIENTED
PROGRAMS
STATISTICAL
MATH MODELLING
PROBLEM SOLVING
CONTROL
ORIENTED
PROGRAMS
INTERACTIVE
REAL-TIME
OTHER
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-6
-------
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM
DATA BASE SUMMARY
(Page 6 of 7)
DE ALL FORMS OF FIXED,
EQUIRED BY THIS SYSTEM.
ES ARE REQUESTED PRI-
ERMANENT FILES INCLU
., PERMANENT FILES R
EMPORARY SCRATCH FIL
/PRIVACY ANALYSIS.
R OF FILES EXCEPT "SIZE". P
EMI-FIXED, PUBLIC, TAPE, ETC
ES ARE LISTED SEPARATELY. T
IZE INFORMATION AND SECURITY
FILE SUMMARY: ALL ENTRIES ARE NUMBE
REMOVABLE, PRIVATE, S
BACK-UP PERMANENT FIL
MARILY FOR RUN-TIME S
<
U_ LU Q
OZ 0- LU
o>-z:
CC \-
LU 00 LU
CQ UJ 31 CD
S:_iCJ <
3 ~< OC
Z LL. LU O
H
OO
UJ 21
CC 00 LU
LU < 1-
Q CQ 00
u_z >-
0:3 < oo
1—
cei- < 1-
LU O Q Z
CQ Z UJ
z: -Js:
3 00 <. UJ
ZLU 51 CD
_IQ: <
— O Z
LL. LL. <
s:
oo
s:
00 UJ LU
LU 00 1—
— 1< 00
— • CQ>-
LL. OO
<
LL. 1—
O < 1-
Q Z
CC LU
LU cc s;
CQ LU LU
S QCD
3 Z <
Z=JZ
<
yamo
yanio
wnaa
(anevAoway) »sia
(Q3XIJ) XSIQ
3dVl
y3H10
d3HiO
")VIlN3nD3S X3QNI
lVUN3nD3S
WOQNVy
d3H10
y3H10
c!3H10
SWI
swai
ooi i swa
0002 W31SAS
_l oo <
< LU LU s:
1— M 1— —•
o — >- o
|— 00 CQ LU
-^ Q
DC
-JUJ 00
< CQ U. LU
1-2: o _i
O^> ~
h-Z U.
\ FILE
\ DESCRIPTION
STORAGE TYPE \^
| PERMANENT
| TEMPORARY
| SCRATCH
Q.
1
^
CJ
<
CQ
CC
LU
X
1-
o
j OTHER
s:
LU
1-
oo
>-
oo
h-
z
LU
s;
LU
CD
<
Z
<
LU
00
<
«
<
V-
<
0
_l
<
cc
o
Ll-
CC
LU
Q
Z
3
o
z
LU.
O
1—
D_
CC
CJ
OO
LU
a
»-
z
LU
s;
LU
CD
<
<
LU
_l
LL
a
UJ
co
cc
a.
o
t_>
oo
s:
LU
H-
oo
>-
00
oo
o
z
LU
>
O
CJ
oc
o
LU
ce
D_
X
LL
O 00
LU LU
Q- z:
oo <
z
LU
t— LU
< -I
CJ —i
•— U-
o
Z LU
—• Q
>
O
OC.
CL
I- oo
Z LU
LU -I
Z LL.
O
CJ 2
LU
z
uj o
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-7
-------
I
I
•
I
•
1
•
1
1
1
I
1
GENERAL SYSTEM/ACTIVITY CHARACTERIZATION FORM (Page 7 of
SYSTEM TRAINING DATA
1. IS THERE A TRAINING RESPONSIBILITY (OR FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY) BUILT INTO THE SYSTEM?
1 1 YES 1 1 NO
IF YES,
A. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS TRAINING FUNCTION?
•
B. IS THIS TRAINING TECHNICAL IN NATURE/ SUCH AS JCL/ECL/ RUNNING COMPUTER
SYSTEMS/ CODING/ OR DATA ENTRY?
DYES Fl
NO
C. IS THIS TRAINING ORIENTED TOWARDS USERS/ MANAGERS/ OR OTHER DIVISION
PERSONNEL?
DYES D
NO
D. DOES THIS TRAINING COVER
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTFMS (Mis) _lYFS INO
PROJECT 1"
SECURITY
ANAGEMENT 1 YES 1 INO
1 — IYES 1 — INO
OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 1 IYES 1 INO
E, HOW MANY DOLLARS ANNUALLY DO YOU COMMIT TO TRAINING RELATED TO THIS
SYSTEM?
2. HOW MANY EPA MANAGERS/ USERS/
AND TECHNICIANS ARE INVOLVED IN THIS SYSTEM?
3. HOW MANY CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (INCLUDING MANAGERS/ SYSTEM ANALYSTS/ AND PROGRAMMERS/
BUT EXCLUDING CLERICAL SUPPORT) ARE INVOLVED IN THIS SYSTEM? O
1
1
1
1
I
Note: Describe all "other" entries as keyed footnotes.
3-8
-------
I
I
I
SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT FORM
Instructions
• The following form must be completed for each system for which
your division has responsibility.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-1
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT FORM
PREPARED BY.
TITLE
DATE COMPLETED.
SYSTEM OR SUBSYSTEM,
OR6. NAME & CODE.
ACRONYM
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS CONCERN THE QUALITY AND CONTENT OF YOUR SYSTEMS DOCUMENTATION
2.
DOES THE DOCUMENTATION CONTAIN
A. A FEASIBILITY STUDY IN A FORMAT AS DESCRIBED IN THE
EPA ADP MANUAL?
B. A JUSTIFICATION OF THIS SYSTEM IN TERMS OF PROGRAM
MISSION OBJECTIVES THAT THIS SYSTEM SUPPORTS?
C. A DETAILED SYSTEM DESCRIPTION? IF YES, THEN ANSWER
THE FOLLOWING. DOES THIS DOCUMENT CONTAIN
(l) NARRATED FLOWCHARTS, BLOCK DIAGRAMS, OR OTHER
INFORMATION WHICH DESCRIBES THE LOGICAL
STRUCTURE OF THIS SYSTEM?
(2) A DESCRIPTION OF THE END USER REQUIREMENTS THAT
ARE SATISFIED BY THIS SYSTEM?
(3) BLOCK DIAGRAMS THAT ILLUSTRATE PROGRAM CALLING
SEQUENCES, HOW PROGRAMS RELATE AND/OR FIT
TOGETHER?
(4) COMPLETE AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ALL INPUTS
AND OUTPUTS?
(5) OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SYSTEM?
DOES THIS SYSTEM HAVE A DOCUMENT DESCRIBING THE TEST PLAN?
IF YES, DOES THIS DOCUMENT CONTAIN
A. AN OVERALL TESTING PHILOSOPHY WHICH DESCRIBES
(l) AN OVERALL TESTING PLAN?
(2) ANY SPECIAL HARDWARE/SOFTWARE TOOLS NEEDED TO
CONDUCT TEST?
(3) METHODS FOR EVALUATING TEST RESULTS?
(4) PERSONS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
TESTING, EVALUATION, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES?
(5) DETAILED TEST DATA REQUIREMENTS?
B. DATA USED TO TEST SYSTEM?
C. RESULTS OF SYSTEM TESTS?
YES
NO
NO.
PAGES
4-2
-------
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT
3. DOES THIS SYSTEM HAVE A USER
THIS USERS GUIDE CONTAIN
FORM (Page 2 of 2)
NO.
YES NO PAGES
S GUIDE? IF YES, DOES
A. IDENTIFICATION OF THOSE ORGANIZATIONS/INDIVIDUALS
FOR WHOM THIS SYSTEM/PROGRAM IS INTENDED?
B. PROCEDURES THAT MUST BE
FOLLOWED IN ORDER TO USE
THE SYSTEM, SUCH AS LOG-ON PROCEDURES, CONTROL
CARD FORMATS, ETC.?
C. DETAILED ERROR AND RECOVERY PROCEDURES?
D, DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF
ALL INPUTS/OUTPUTS?
4. IS SOURCE CODE FOR THIS SYSTEM AVAILABLE? IF YES,
THEN ANSWER THE FOLLOWING?
A. IS THE SOURCE CODE WELL
DOCUMENTED?
B. DOES SYSTEM HAVE ANY UNDOCUMENTED CHANGES?
C, INDICATE ORGANIZATION OF
SOURCE CODE
D NON-STANDARD DsTANDARD DREAD ONLY
D. IN WHAT FORM DOES SOURCE
ODISK DTAPE
CODE EXIST!
DCARDS DPRINTOUT DMICROFICHE
4-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SYSTEM EVALUATION FORM
Instructions
This form will provide a technical evaluation of each data
processing system for which your division is responsible. It
is an important element of an appraisal currently being made of
the overall technical condition of ADP systems in use at the
EPA.
Each form evaluates one system and should be filled in by the
programmer or programmer/analyst responsible for or most fami-
liar with the technical capabilities of the system,
Block 1. IDENTIFICATION
Enter the name of the system being evaluated and the system ID.
Block 2. SYSTEM SCOPE
In Item 1, indicate how many divisions are presently using the
system. In Item 2, indicate how many other divisions could
use the system with minor or no modifications. In Item 3,
indicate whether this system updates and/or accesses a data
base which is shared by other systems.
The remainder of the form is devoted to an evaluation of the
technical characteristics of the system. A number of categor-
ies are specified on the form. Rate the system in each cate-
gory by checking the appropriate box on the right. Each of the
categories will be weighted to reflect its relative importance
before the results are compiled.
Block 3. DESIGN
Evaluate the overall design quality of the system in each of the
categories described below:
1. System modularity and logical processing flow: Is
the system of sound design; is it built in a modular,
straightforward architecture; is the flow of control
easy to understand and follow; were structured pro-
gramming techniques used if appropriate?
5-1
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
System functionally consistent with user require-
ments; Does the system provide functions appropriate
to the user's functions and requirements; does it
provide all required functions without providing
extraneous, unneeded capabilities?
Appropriateness of logical file/data base struc^ture^:
Are data files laid out well;is all data available
and easy to access; are data interrelationships
logically and correctly defined; is there sufficient
room for expansion of file space and addition of
data item types?
Efficiency of data storage and access techniques:
Are the file types and access techniques appropriate
for the application; is data rapidly accessible when
appropriate; is data access and update efficient
within the context of normal processing done by the
system?
Quality of controls and data validation: Are input
data edits thorough and well-designed; are program-
to-program controls and data file controls reliable;
are system totals carried forward properly, such as
from daily to weekly cycles or from one application
system to another; is the system stable; is restart
and recovery simple and reliable?
Efficiency of JCL/ECL design: Is the Job Control
Language or Executive Control Language structured in a
simple, straightforward way?
Utilization of hardware/software: Is the system
coded efficiently;is program segmentation and over-
lay activity efficient; is memory resident data
appropriately structured and used; in on-line sys-
tems, are transactions processed efficiently; is I/O
activity kept within efficient bounds?
Ability of system to be integrated with or interfaced
to other systems: Can new external interfaces be
made easily; can outputs of this system be utilized
by other systems; does this system fit well into the
context of other related systems; does data flow
efficiently from this system into other systems?
Appropriateness of design for meeting user deadlines:
Does system, as designed, allow users to meet their
deadlines?
5-2
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10. Efficiency of data entry provisions: Are input forms
easy to follow and read; are card layouts well
designed; can system be easily adapted to key-to-disk
entry techniques if appropriate?
11. Adequacy of security features: Are security provi-
sions designed into the system appropriately. Given
the nature of the system and sensitivity of the data,
are measures effective without being cumbersome or
excessive?
12. Adherence to standards; Are the programs of this
system written in conformance with division stan-
dards; does documentation follow standards; are data
naming, I/O layout, JCL/ECL and other appropriate
standards and conventions followed?
13. Comments; Comments or elaborations regarding quality
of systems design can be entered here. Use back of
questionnaire as needed.
Block 4. MAINTAINABILITY
Evaluate the ease of maintenance of the system in each of the
categories described below:
1. Quality of documentation: Is documentation avail-
able, up-to-date, and easy to follow; does documenta-
tion lead quickly to the areas requiring maintenance;
is the documentation easily updatable when program
modifications are made?
2. Ability to trace problem through system logic, to
fully test changes, and to completely predict impact
of changes (including impact oh other systems!"": Are
changes made in one area of code unlikely to cause
changes to have to be made in other areas; can the
impact on other areas be easily analyzed; can all
areas of code requiring modification to effect a
change be easily identified; can changes be tested in
a straightforward way under a variety of typical and
abnormal processing circumstances; does system
remain stable after a series of modifications?
3. Maintainability of language used; Is the source code
language easy to modify;is it one of the languages
currently in wide use by the EPA; are language features
used which enhance maintainability, such as descriptive
data names and comments embedded in the source code?
Is this is a problem area? Identify program language
under "COMMENTS".
5-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. Availability of test data (transactions & files): Is
a test data base available and of high quality; are
test transactions available and do they test a wide
range of normal and abnormal processing conditions?
5. System complexity; Subjective assessment based on
interface requirements, number, and type of languages
used in the system, computational techniques, hard-
ware requirements, etc.
6. Comments; Any comments regarding maintainability of
the application can be entered here. Use back of the
questionnaire as needed.
Block 5. OPERABILITY
Evaluate the ease of operation and use of the system in each of
the categories described below. Operations personnel should
participate in this part of the evaluation.
1. Ease of operation; Does system require a minimum of
interaction by operators; are operator actions, in
event of abnormal operating situations, well-documented
and easily handled; are magnetic tape mounts and
dismounts kept to a minimum; is system able to detect
operator error; is forms printing well handled?
2. Outages and reruns: Are system outages and need for
reruns infrequently encountered; are program abnormal
terminations, logical failures, and data failures not
a problem; are hardware or operating system failures
seldom encountered? Comment below if problems in
this area are due consistently to a single cause.
3. Problem investigations: Is need to investigate
program or data problems infrequently encountered?
4. Technical currency of system: Does system fit well
into current operating environment; does it make use
of currently available hardware and operating system
features?
5. Comments; Any comments on system operability would
be helpful. Use back of questionnaire as needed.
5-4
-------
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PREPA
TITLE
1,
1)
2)
2.
D
2)
3}
3.
D
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
SYSTEM EVALUATION FORM
RED BY DATE COMPLETED
ORG. NAME 8 CODE
IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM NAME
SYSTEM ID: ' (COL. 2-11 )
SYSTEM SCOPE
HOW MANY DIVISIONS CURRENTLY USE THIS SYSTEM? (COL. 21-22)
HOW MANY DIVISIONS COULD USE THIS SYSTEM? (COL. 23-24)
DOES THIS SYSTEM UTILIZE A MULTISYSTEM DATA BASE? DYES D,MO (COL. 25 )
DESIGN
EVALUATION
EXCEL. POOR
54321
SYSTEM MODULARITY AND LOGICAL PROCESSING FLOW (COL. 26)
SYSTEM FUNCTIONALLY CONSISTENT WITH USER REQUIREMENTS (COL. 2?)
APPROPRIATENESS OF LOGICAL FILE/DATA BASE STRUCTURE (COL, 28)
EFFICIENCY OF DATA STORAGE AND ACCESS TECHNIQUES (COL. 29)
QUALITY OF CONTROLS AND DATA VALIDATION (COL. 30 )
EFFICIENCY OF JCL/ECL DESIGN (COL.3l)
UTILIZATION OF HARDWARE/SOFTWARE (COL, 32)
ABILITY OF SYSTEM TO BE INTEGRATED WITH OR INTERFACED TO
OTHER SYSTEMS (COL. 33)
APPROPRIATENESS OF DESIGN FOR MEETING USER DEADLINES (COL. 34)
EFFICIENCY OF DATA ENTRY PROVISIONS (COL. 35)
ADEQUACY OF SECURITY FEATURES (COL. 36)
ADHERENCE TO STANDARDS (COL. 37)
COMMENTS :
5-5
-------
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SYSTEM EVALUATION FORM (page 2 , 2)
H, MAINTAINABILITY
EVALUATION
EXCEL. POOR
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
5 4
QUALITY OF DOCUMENTATION
ABILITY TO TRACE PROBLEM THROUGH SYSTEM LOGIC, TO FULLY TEST
CHANGES, AND TO COMPLETELY PREDICT IMPACT OF CHANGES
MAINTAINABILITY OF LANGUAGE USED
AVAILABILITY OF TEST DATA (TRANSACTIONS & FILES)
SYSTEM COMPLEXITY: LlHIGH LJMEDIUM ULOW
COMMENTS :
3 2 1
(COL. 4i )
(COL. 42)
(COL. 43)
(COL. 44 )
5. OPERABILITY
EVALUATION
EXCEL. POOR
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
5 4 ;
EASE OF OPERATION
INFREQUENT
5 4 :
OUTAGES AND RERUNS
PROBLEM INVESTIGATIONS
EXCEL.
5 4 ;
TECHNICAL CURRENCY OF SYSTEM
COMMENTS :
5 2 1
(COL. 51 )
FREQUENT
J 2 1
(COL. 52)
(COL. 53)
POOR
5 2 1
(COL. 54)
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
AND ADDRESS:
5-6
-------
SECURITY/PRIVACY/FREEDQM-OF-INFORMATION FORM
Instructions
I
I
I
Please complete one set of these forms for each system for
I which your division has responsibility.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-1
-------
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
1
1
SECURITY/PRIVACY/FREEDOM-OF-INFORMATION FORM
PREPARED BY DATE COMPLETED
TITLE ORG. NAME & CODE
SYSTEM NAME
1. DOES A PLAN EXIST FOR RESPONDING TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
DYES DNO
IF YES, PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF THE PLAN.
IF NO, COMMENT AS TO HOW A FOIR WILL BE HANDLED:
.
REQUESTS (FOIR)?
2. THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTION OF INFORMATION
1
1
1
•
1
•
1
1
1
1
WHICH CONTAINS PERSONAL AND/OR PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE DATA
BEEN MADE AS TO WHETHER THIS SYSTEM HAS ANY DATA PROTECTED
DYES DNO
IF YES, PLEASE ATTACH THE FINDINGS,
IF NO, DOES THE SYSTEM CONTAIN DATA WHICH CAN BE RELATED TO
DYES DNO
IF YES, DOES THIS DATA INCLUDE:
DNAME DBUSINESS ADDRESS
DHOME ADDRESS DSOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
D OTHER
BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS DATA!
6-2
. HAS A DETERMINATION
BY THE PRIVACY ACT?
AN INDIVIDUAL?
DFINANCIAL DATA
DHEALTH DATA
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECUBIH/PRIV»Ct/F«EEDOM-OHNF(IR«ATIOH FflW
(Page 2 of 3)
3. OMB CIRCULAR A~71 (SECURITY OF FEDERAL AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS) CLOSELY
RELATES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FEDERAL MANAGER TO PROTECT THE GOVERNMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, HAS AN EVALUATION OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SYSTEM
BEEN MADE?
DYES DNO
IF YES, PLEASE ATTACH.
IF NO, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
A. DOES THE SYSTEM CONTAIN DATA THROUGH WHICH AN INDIVIDUAL COULD OBTAIN A
PERSONAL GAIN? FOR EXAMPLE, PAYROLL DATA MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST UN-
AUTHORIZED ENTRIES WHICH AFFECT RATE OF PAY.
DYES DNO
IF YES, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE:
B. DOES THE SYSTEM CONTAIN EPA DATA WHICH MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST IMPROPER
RELEASE? AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE DATA ABOUT CONTRACTS WHICH ARE BEING
NEGOTIATED.
DYES DNO
IF YES, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE!
C. DOES THE SYSTEM CONTAIN DATA WHICH HAS BEEN CLASSIFIED AS CONFIDENTIAL
BUSINESS INFORMATION?
DYES DNO
6-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECUUTY/PRIVACWREEDOIHNNFQilMATIONFaUl
(Page 3 of 3)
4.
IF YES. DESCRIBE THE INFORMATION:
D. DO CURRENT PROCEDURES EXIST TO PROTECT THE DATA FROM UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS?
DYES
DNO
IF YES, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE:
OMB CIRCULAR A~71 (SECURITY OF FEDERAL AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS) ALSO
PLACES THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROTECTING AGAINST INTERRUPTION OF SERVICES.
A.
DOES A BACKUP EXIST FOR THE CURRENT FILES OF THE SYSTEM?
DYES DNO
IF YES, HOW MANY? .
ARE THE BACKUPS IN THE SAME
DATA CENTER DYES DNO
BUILDING DYES ONO
CITY DYES DNO
STATE DYES DNO
WHAT MEDIA IS USED TO KEEP THE BACKUPS?
DTAPE DCARD DDISK D OTHER.
B.
THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT AN EPA DATA CENTER COULD BE UNAVAILABLE FOR
EXTENDED PERIODS. PLEASE EVALUATE THE IMPACT UPON THE AGENCY IF THIS
SYSTEM WERE REMOVED FOR THE FOLLOWING PERIODS:
TIME PERIOD
1/2 DAY
1 DAY
3 DAYS
1 WEEK
1 MONTH
2 MONTHS
IMPACT
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
COMMENTS REGARDING IMPACT
6-4
-------
MINICOMPUTER USAGE FORM
Instructions
uses.
2. The functions (Question 3) should include all uses your
division makes of the mini: update of national data bases,
management activities, initial program development, algo-
rithm verification, etc.
3. The mini configuration (Question 6) should show all major
components and capacities of the system: e.g., memory size
number and capacity of disks and tapes, terminals, tele-
communication equipment and line rates, etc.
I
I
I
I 1. Complete one form for each minicomputer which your division
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------
I
I MINICOMPUTER USAGE FORM
I
I
PREPARED BY DATE COMPLETED.
TITLE ORG. NAME & CODE.
NAME & PHONE NUMBER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I i O X O /
1. MINICOMPUTER NAME (VENDOR'S ID)_ -^i&iTtiL /' ^ / HjlO
I/O
I i / ^ J '\ 1 )
2. PHYSICAL LOCATION V--i4^/lf»O L: r H kt-Glo^ ^
13. FUNCTIONS PERFORMED & INTERFACES WITH NCC/WCC SYSTEMS (AT A MINIMUM, ASSOCIATE
FUNCTIONS WHERE APPROPRIATE WITH USE OF NCC/WCC DATA BASES. INDICATE WHEN DATA
(CONTINUE ON BACK OF FORM!
ARE TRANSMITTED TO MINI, PROCESSED, AND RETURNED):
I ===1
I ^^^^^^^=
|
I ========
I
4. OPERATING SYSTEM & MAJOR SUPPORT SOFTWARE (SUPPORT SOFTWARE SHOULD INCLUDE DATA
_ MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, COMPILERS, ASSEMBLERS, ETC.):
| £3 T A ti E>/\ T /> PbP op pT 6J r\ £.£:'
I =
I
I
I
I
I
5. NUMBER OF EPA-PRODUCED PROGRAMS USED ON THIS MINI
TOTAL LINES OF SOURCE CODE IN PROGRAMS:
6. EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION (USE BACK OF FORM):
NUMBER OF DISK DRIVES '^~
NUMBER OF TAPE DRIVES /
CORE SIZE (BYTES) / .7(p.MIL DECIMAL
7-2
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA ADP
SYSTEMS/ACTIVITIES LIST
AND
SYSTEM/ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
I
8-1
-------
I
I
EPA/ADP
• SYSTEMS/ACTIVITIES LIST & SYSTEM ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
• Table of Contents
• Introduction 8-3
0PM - Systems/Activities List 8-4
m OPM - System/Activity Description 8-5
• OE - Systems/Activities List 8-7
OE - System/Activity Description 8-8
I OWHM - Systems/Activities List 8-9
OWHM - System/Activity Description 8-10
| OAWM - Systems/Activities List 8-12
_ OAWM - System/Activity Description 8-13
™ OTS - Systems/Activities List 8-14
• OTS - System/Activity Description 8-15
ORD - Systems/Activities List 8-16
| ORD - System/Activity Description 8-18
_ Regional - Systems/Activities List ....... .8-22
~ Regional - System/Activity Description 8-23
• Functional ADP Activities for All Organizations. .8-24
I
I
I
I
8-2
I
-------
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Introduction
This set of reference material is provided to aid in prepar-
ing forms for the EPA/ADP Survey. The systems have been
grouped by responsible organization: 0PM, OE, OWHM, OAWM,
OTS, ORD, and Region. The final section is a list and des-
cription of functional activities that may be applicable to
any organization. The systems names and descriptions have
been compiled from many sources: the 1976 Environmental Sys-
tems Directory; Informatics, Inc.; Index Systems, Inc., Sur-
veys and Studies; accounting data from monthly billing
records; and personal interviews with EPA personnel. The
lists of systems presented herein have not been rigorously
verified as representing the current EPA set; that is, the
purpose of this EPA/ADP Survey. The lists do, however,
represent the best that could be reasonably compiled as
reference data prior to the survey.
8-3
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0PM - Systems/Activities List
ACRONYM SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
LINFO Library and Information Services
FORM Forms and Publications
GIGS Grants Information and Control System
CIS Contracts Information System
PMIS Personnel Management Information System
RMIS Resource Management System
PPS Personal Property System
TSSMS Time-Sharing Services Management System
FRS Formal Reporting System
FMS Financial Management System
LIB Library System
FFF Federal Facility Budgetary System
Form 67 Retrieval System
SRIS Standards and Regulation Information System
GASS General Administration System Support
Name and Address Systems and Catalog and Inventory
System
Management Information Branch
Milestone Reporting System
Zero Based Budgeting System
Authority Dollar Input System
Automated Audit Tracking and Control System
Scientific Applications Software Study
Socioeconomic Impact Study/San Diego
8-4
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0PM - System/Activity Description
V • Library and Information Services (LINFO); Provides support
for indexing, cataloging, and tracking of EPA library hold-
ings at RTF.
• Forms and Publications (FORM); Provides capacity to maintain
and update forms, publications, and name/address file and
provides access lists and labels in support of RTP
operations.
• Grants Information and Control System (GIGS): Provides a
comprehensive data base and reporting capability used to
track the status of more than thirty thousand actual or pro-
posed grants.
• Contracts Information System (CIS): Provides identification
of all pending procurement actions and their status, plus all
relevant contract information from award to completion.
• Personnel Management Information System (PMIS); Provides
personnel data and capabilities to analyze and report on this
data in support of management activities and related opera-
tions such as training and EEO reporting. The payroll por-
tion is provided by the Department of Interior and will
remain so. The utilization at the Department of Interior
Payroll System (DIPS) is not included in any EPA workload
projections.
• Resource Management Information System (RMIS): Assists in
the development of the Agency budget and operating plans and
in the administrative control of funds.
• Personal Property System (PPS); Provides inventory control
and accountability for property under the control of EPA as
required by the Federal Property and Administrative Services
Act.
• Time-Sharing Services Management System (TSSMS); Provides a
cost accounting system that tracks computer charges against
user accounts and generates reports for the user community
and ADP managers.
• Formal Reporting System (FRS): Provides a framework within
which data pertinent to major EPA and State plans/programs
are consolidated into a unified reporting scheme and made
available to Agency management.
• Financial Management System (FMS); Supports the financial
information needs of the Agency. The system allows the man-
ager to monitor commitments against authorized obligations
and provides the external reports required by other agencies
and Congress.
8-5
-------
I
I
• Library System (LIB); Provides the 28 EPA Libraries with a
management and retrieval system for their book, journal, and
I reports collections.
• Federal Facility Budgetary System (FFF); Provides the data
§ which is used in assessing the budgetary requests for
pollution abatement projects being constructed by Federal
agencies. This system permits easy retrieval of pollution
data from the Federal Power Commission automated file on
• power plant operations.
• Standards & Regulations Information System (SRIS); Tracks
the preparation and review processes for all proposed pol-
lution abatement standards, regulations, and guidelines being
developed by EPA under authority of EPA Order 1000.6.
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
General Administrative Support System (GASS); Provides local
divisions with information for management activities.
8-6
-------
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ACRONYM
FOBS
PCS
CDS
PEMS
EMDB
ERSS
NEDB
IDBS
OE - Systems/Activities List
SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
Fuels Data Base System
Permit Compliance System
Compliance Data System
Pesticides Enforcement Management System
Emissions Data Base
Establishment Registration Support System
Noise Enforcement Data Base
Imports Data Base System
8-7
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OE - System/Activity Description
Fuels Data Base System (FOBS); A range of capabilities in-
cluding data storage, analysis, and tracking related to vio-
lations of nonleaded fuel requirements by gasoline stations
and/or suppliers.
Permit Compliance System (PCS): Provides an automated data
base containing inventory information of over 60,000 water
permit applications; used for planning and evaluating the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and
responding to requests for information.
Compliance Data System (CDS); Provides tracking capability
on facilities subject to air pollution regulations, the
status of compliance of these facilities with regulations,
and the status of required corrective actions.
Pesticides Enforcement Management System (PEMS); Contains
data on samples collected from market-place surveillance,
establishment inspections, imports and misuse investigations.
Weekly, monthly, and quarterly reports are produced.
Emissions Data Base (EMDB); Provides a data base for reten-
tion and retrieval of emissions data on approximately 3/4
million vehicles, and the capability to analyze the data
using a range of statistical techniques.
Establishment Registration Support System (ERSS); Supports
the pesticides registration process by maintaining a nation-
wide file identifying all pesticide-producing establishments,
the products produced at each establishment, and production/-
distribution histories and estimates.
Noise Enforcement Data Base (NEDB); Supports retention of
data used to identify, analyze, and track violators of noise
regulations and the capability to analyze noise pollution
data using mathematical/statistical technology.
Imports Data Base System (IDBS): Provides a data base of
information on all automobiles passing through U.S. Customs
and a capability to search this data and identify all
vehicles not in compliance with the provisions of the Clean
Air Act.
8-8
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OWHM - Systems/Activities List
ACRONYM SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
STORET Storage and Retrieval System for Water Quality Data
NEEDS Survey of Needs for Municipal Wastewater Treatment
RCG Regional Construction Grants
IP Industry Profiles
INVWAS Existing Water Supply
SWIRS Solid Waste Information System
O&M Operation and Maintenance
SPCC Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure
FRDS Federal Reporting Data System for Safe Drinking Water
TADS Technical Assistance Data System
Underground Injection Control
Office of Water Supply Software
Water Program Operations
Interstate Carrier and Primary Data
8-9
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OWHM - System/Activity Description
Storage and Retrieval System for Water Quality Data (STORET) ;
Provides a national data bank of information on water quality
in the United States.
Survey of needs for Municipal Waste Water Treatment Facili-
ties (NEEDS); Provides a repository and reporting capability
covering technical and cost data for public-owned treatment
works; produces cost estimates used as a basis for allocating
construction grant funds.
Regional Construction Grants (RCG); Provides a system for
the management and administrative control of the waste water
treatment construction grants program; outputs include recur-
ring management reports, responses to ad hoc requests and
forecasts of fiscal outlays.
Industry Profiles (IP); Serves to locate and describe toxics
related industry and trends.
Existing Water Supply (INVWAS); Provides an inventory record
of community and noncommunity public water supplies used
throughout the United States.
Solid Waste Information System (SWIRS): A bibliographic
system which provides access to international literature
related to solid waste information. It provides references
to the latest developments in the field for disseminating
technological information.
Operations and Maintenance (O&M); Serves as a repository for
information collected annually on the efficiency of operation
and maintenance of treatment works constructed under Federal
Grants; used to provide regularly scheduled and ad hoc
reports for program management.
Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) ; Used
to monitor and report on compliance deadlines and actions to
be taken for the prevention of spills from oil storage
facilities and to track spills which have occurred.
Federal Reporting Data Systems for Safe Drinking Water
(FRDS): System in development. Will provide an inventory of
the public water system in the United States and its quality.
Technical Assistance Data System (TADS); The purpose of TADS
is to reduce the effects of oil and hazardous materials
spills by providing on-line access to information on material
characteristics and emergency response procedures. Field
emergency teams can access information directly through
terminals or by telephoning someone with a terminal.
8-10
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Underground Injection Control; An activity developed by EPA-
HQ. The programs are provided to Regions/States to assist
them in meeting PL 93-523 mandated requirements.
Water Enforcement Regional Systems; Basic facility ID and
permit development tracing functions, compliance tracking and
enforcement action tracking, automated screening of DMR's,
building efficient data base of limits and reported values.
8-11
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OAWM - Systems/Activities List
ACRONYM SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
SAROAD Storage and Retrieval of Aerometric Data
NEDS National Emission Data System
EDS Energy Data System
AEROS Aerometric and Emission Reporting System
TR Trends Report
APTIC Air Pollution Technical Information Center
IPP Air Quality Implementation Planning Program
PRMS Plan Review Management System
NOISE Noise Analysis Service
Analysis Service of Radiation Scientist
AQED Air Quality and Emission Data Analysis
Statistical Analysis of Technical Data
Power Plant Modeling System
Air Quality Information Service
HATREMS Development
Mobile Source Emissions Factor Computer Program
Standard Region Activities Levels
R-12
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
OAWM - System/Activity Description
Storage and Retrieval of Aerometric Data (SAROAD): Air qual-
ity sample data in the nation are received trom The states
and stored for analysis in determining progress in achieving
and maintaining air quality standards. Annual trend reports
and special studies are supported by the SAROAD data base.
National Emissions Data System (NEDS); A national data base
on emissions from major sources of air pollution, used for
evaluation of proposed emission standards and control strate-
gies. A national emissions inventory report is prepared from
these data.
Energy Data System (EDS); Provides a national overview of
the impact on the air environment of the National Energy Pro-
gram and an assessment of regional variations in emissions.
Aerometric and Emission Reporting System (AEROS): Resulted
from the evolutionary development of NEDS and SAROAD. It is
a management information system for EPA's air pollution
research and control programs.
Trends Report (TR) : Enables determination of regional and
national ambient air quality trends and significance of
trends in terms of national control policies.
Air Pollution Technical Information Center (APTIC); This
bibliogrphic system collects and rapidly disseminates the
growing body of air quality technical information. Computer
searching of relevant articles assists air pollution agencies
and other public or private organizations.
Air Quality Implementation Planning Program (IPP); The air
quality Implementation Planning Program is a model for
preparing air pollution implementation plans for sulphur
oxides and particulates.
Plan Review Management System (PRMS); The PRMS Assists in
the analysis of the need for review of State Implementation
Plans. Also aids in the determination of possible
nonattainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
by particular Air Quality Control Regions.
Noise Analysis Service (NOISE): The Noise File provides
technical literature abstracts to Government agencies,
private firms, and the general public. It is used by EPA in
the development of standards and regulations and is available
to the States and Regions as well.
Radiation Scientific Statistical System; Determination of
generation characteristics and histories of ionizing and non-
ionizing radiation; determination of exposure and risks.
8-13
-------
OTS - Systems/Activities List
»
ACRONYM SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
PPIS Pesticides Product Information System
COMP Company Data System
EMS Ecological Monitoring System
PARCS Pesticides Analysis Retrieval and Control System
MM Math Modeling
Chemical Substructures Biological Activity Model
8-14
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OTS - System/Activity Description
Pesticides Product Information System (PPIS); Supports the
requirement for registration and classification of all pesti-
cides produced and used; system is used to control the regis-
tration of pesticides, study the efficacy of the pesticide
program, produce analytical reports, and support compliance
and cancellation activities. NOTE: New systems for OTS are
under development.
Company Data System (COMP): An automated data catalog list
utilized to identify,search, and locate hardcopy information
collected on pesticides product testing; estimate of requests
in FY'78 is for over 60,000 documents.
Ecological Monitoring Systems (EMS); A series of data base
systems which contain monitoring data collected on the effect
of pesticdes use on man and environmental media such as
soils, air, water, oceans, and estuaries.
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP): Responsible for regis-
tration of all pesticides used in the nation. PARCS provides
a centralized source of information on all of these regis-
tered pesticides. Data in the system are used for registra-
tion analysis, research, and reporting.
Math Modeling (MM): Monitoring and determination of the ef-
fects of injection of toxic substances into the environment.
8-15
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACRONYM
RAPS
CHESS
NCPSS
MORT
FPEIS
PARTICLE
AQSM
AERSOL
WSS
STATE
EADS
EPID
CRD
PSS
MIS
TECH
ORD - Systems/Activities List
SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
Regional Air Pollution Study
Community Health & Environmental Surveillance System
Non-Criteria Pollutant and Special Study
Mortality Studies
Fine Particle Emissions Information System
Particle Characterization
Air Quality Simulation Model
Aerosol Sampling and Analysis
Water Supply Simulation
Sulfate Transport and Transformation in the
Envi ronment
Environmental Assessment Data Base
New Epidemiological Studies
Chronic Respiratory Diseases
Population Studies System
Management Information System
General ADP
Special Studies
Statistical Support
Physical Studies
Aerometric Studies
Experimental Biology
Quality Assurance
Pesticide Toxic
Air Quality Monitor
Technology Assessment
8-16
-------
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
GLWQM
WWTDB
BPM
EVAL
LDMS
NES
SSM
SEAS
PMFWE
LAMS
PUBLIC
Great Lakes Water Quality Models
Waste Water Treatment Data Base
Basin Planning Model
Evaluation Model
Laboratory Data Management System
National Eutrophication Study
State of the System Model
Strategic Environmental Assessment
Prediction Model for Fresh Water Ecosystem
Lake Analysis Management System
Administration
Biostoret
Public Affairs Mailing List
8-17
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORD - System/Activity Description
• Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS); A research program to
validate, develop and improve air pollution simulation models
through data collected by a ground-based network supported by
air measurements in the St. Louis, Missouri, Air Quality Con-
trol Region.
• Community Health & Environmental Surveillance System (CHESS):
Processes large volumes of data collected under the Community
Health & Environmental Surveillance Studies and provides
statistical analyses of this data for the purpose of
evaluating existing environmental standards, obtaining health
intelligence for new standards, and documenting the benefits
of air pollution control.
• Non-Criteria Pollutant and Special Study (NCPSS); Provides
acquisition, management, analysis, and data reporting from
noncriteria pollutant networks and special monitoring
projects.
• Mortality Studies (MORT); Provides a definition of mortality
models as a function of meteorological and pollutant vari-
ables. The models allow prediction of mortality associated
with increased pollution levels.
• Fine Particle Emissions Information System (FPEIS); This is
an automated emission inventory system which contains infor-
mation on particle size distribution and their chemical and
physical properties.
I« Particle Characterization (PARTICLE): Provides acquisition,
Analysis, and modeling of aerosol data and particle
characterization.
• Air Quality Simulation Model (AQSM): Provides rapid response
on applications of air quality models to EPA Headquarters,
regions, and laboratories; and provides an analysis of air
quality data.
• Aerosol Sampling and Analysis (AEROSOL); Provides "fine"
analysis of data from aerosol samples in connection with
x-ray fluorescence, for particle sizing, and for instrument
evaluation.
• Water Supply Simulation (WSS); Provides determination of the
cost of water supply, economic effects of cancer and other
diseases affected by drinking water compared to cost and
benefits of new techniques in water purification, and
simulation of cost of water supply distribution in specific
areas; measures demand of use; and evaluates cost.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-18
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sulfate Transport and Transformation in the Environment
(STATE); Provides regional coverage for specific periods of
time,using mobile trailers for support of sample collection
and performs heavy analysis of data collected. This system
will replace RAPS in 1980.
Environmental Assessment Data Base (BADS): This is a devel-
oping system which will consist of a large data base and
software modules for providing efficient handling of environ-
mental assessment data needed by lERL's assessment projects.
New Epidemiological Studies (EPID): This activity provides
data processing/analysis of data collected for epidemio-
logical studies for evaluation of existing standards, for ob-
taining health intelligence for new standards, and for docu-
mentation of health benefits of air pollution controls.
Chronic Respiratory Diseases (CRD): This activity analyzes
data collected by the Health Effects Research Laboratory.
Population Studies System (PSS); Produces statistical type
data for evaluating the effects of specific air pollutants on
human health.
Management Information System (MIS); This activity contains
all computer support for regional administrators, as well as
use of national administrative systems such as TSSMS and PPS.
General ADP: General data processing and program support.
Special Studies: Data processing support for special studies
undertaken to support health effects research.
Statistical Support; Provides statistical analysis support
for the health research studies through the use of existing
statistical software and the development of new software.
Physical Studies; This system is used to validate data from
the laboratory mini-system, create a valid data base, and
produce summary trend and statistical reports.
Aerometric Studies; Storage and retrieval of aerometric data
in support of health research studies.
Experimental Biology; To provide data management and statis-
tical analysis for data collected by various research scien-
tists in the Experimental Biology Laboratory.
Quality Assurance; The performance evaluation system is a
minor image of NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimina-
tion System) comparison of results from laboratories vs.
known samples.
8-19
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pesticide Toxic; ADP is used to analyze data collected to
assess levels of pesticidal residues in selected components
of the environment.
Air Quality Monitor; Supports the ground monitoring and air-
borne sensing of air information.
Technology Assessment (TECH); This system is a series of
models used to forecast the impact of environmental require-
ments on economic, sociological, and energy/environmental
conditions. It supports technology assessments and special
reports, such as the one for the Council on Environment Qual-
ity (CEQ) on the cost of clean air.
Great Lakes Water Quality Models (GLWQM); Provides mathema-
tical simulation of physical, chemical, and biological pro-
cesses in the Great Lakes. Activities include the simulation
of water circulation, production of phytoplankton biomass,
fate and transport of hazardous materials, and sediment
transport and resuspension .
Waste Water Treatment Data Base (WWTDB); A developmental sys-
tem building a data base on waste water treatment plants;
data includes operation cost data, performance data, as well
as data on insufficient performance cause.
Basin Planning Models (BPM); Provides basin-wide pollution
analysis methodologies. Models include a hydrologic unit
management module, a socioeconomic impact module, a specific
pollutant module, and basin planning and area-wide planning
modules.
Evaluation Model (EVAL); Provides the methodology for evalu-
ating potential environmental problems from point and non-
point sources.
Laboratory Data Management System (LDMS); Utilizes large-
scale, time-shared computers to assist Regional and enforce-
ment laboratories in storing, editing, manipulating, and
analyzing data generated from chemical and physical analyses
performed by EPA laboratories.
National Eutrophication Study (NES); The objective is to
study the aging and enrichment process in 800 selected lakes
in 48 states.
State of the System Model (SSM); A model which analyzes
different alternative approaches for matching the growth
desires of a populated area with the limitations of the
environmental and man-made resources.
8-20
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEAS); A large computer
model designed to forecast the impact of environmental
quality requirements on economic, sociological, energy
demand, and ecological conditions. The other economic and
demographic variations on pollutant residual levels also is
projected by the material used to study possible consequences
of alternative environmental policies, energy related
socioeconomic trends over a 10-15 year time span.
Predictive Models for Fresh Water Ecosystems (PMFWE); Will
predict the degradation and movement of specific pollutants
in aquatic ecosystems.
Lake Analysis Management System (LAMS); Interface to STORET,
gathers data, edits, performs quality control.
Administration; Includes various administrative systems in
s'uppor't of 'laboratory activities, including commitment
register tracking, position management, and mailing labels.
Biostoret; Biostoret was conceived as a support system for
theinput side of biological systems.
Public Affairs Mailing List (PUBLIC); Provides a backup
mailing list containing data on about 30,000 addresses which
receive news releases and other public information.
8-21
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACRONYM
AQDS
GTS
Regional - Systems/Activities List
SYSTEM OR ACTIVITY
Air Quality Analysis (I)
Water System Analysis (I)
Air Quality Data System (I)
State Water Supplies (II)
Grant Tracking System (III)
Civil Rights System (V)
Waste Water Treatment Data Base (V)
Regional Solid Waste Inventory System (X)
Water Quality Modeling (X)
Regional Management Systems (X)
Model State Information System (X)
8-22
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regional - System/Activity Description
Air Quality Analysis; The analyses provide technical infor-
mation in support of the air programs.
Water System Analysis; This provides the in-house modeling
and analyses by EPA for NPDES permits, environmental assess-
ment, water quality planning, 208 planning and regional water
quality assessment.
Air Quality Data System (AQDS); Serves as interim substitute
for SAROAD during extended NCC/SAROAD instability.
State Water Supplies; Maintenance of inventory of community
and non-community water supplies.
Grants Tracking System (GTS); Regional data system designed
to provide management level and detailed information on a
grant application prior to its award. Contains detailed in-
formation not found in GICS.
Civil Rights System; Civil Rights System maintains current
EEO data regarding 4,000 employees.
Waste Water Treatment Data Base; Building data base on waste
water treatment plant data.
Regional Solid Waste Inventory System; An inventory of dis-
posal sites is maintained with descriptive information.
Water Quality Modeling; Water quality simulation.
8-23
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Functional ADP Activities for All Organizations
High Order Language (HOL) Program Development and
Maintenance; This activity primarily represents execution of
language processors such as compilers, precompilers, and
assemblers. It may also include compiling and/or assembling
selected subroutines for the Collector at NCC or the Link
Editor at WCC.
Language Processor Development and Maintenance; This activ-
ity includes the development, test, and evaluation of pre-
compilers and HOL processors. Test and evaluation of vendor
provided language processors may be described under this
activity.
Procedure Development and Maintenance; This activity entails
the development and maintenance of predetermined "runstreams"
by exercising vendor supplied software to decrease the
interaction of the user and machine.
Operating System Modifications, Enhancements, and Evaluation;
This activity includes all types of operating system process-
ing that is not done with dedicated machine time and is
charged back to some organization by the accounting system.
Utility Development and Maintenance; This activity includes
the development of unique efficient sort/merge, I/O, and
standard computational conversion functions for specific user
requirements.
Data Base Management; This activity includes the development
and maintenance of data access and manipulation programs for
user constructed data bases when the provided data base man-
agement systems are too costly or inadequate.
Data Presentation: This activity includes the development
and execution of programs to produce plots, graphic displays,
reports, and microfiche for data presentation.
Statistical Analysis; This activity includes the development
and execution of any statistical analysis programs that are
not provided by an ADP software system or by a vendor sup-
plied product.
Simulation and Modeling; This activity is primarily for
those R & D efforts which require mathematical analysis for
unique one of a kind data processing support.
User Assistance and Training; This activity includes all the
changes made via account numbers for testing and problem
solving requested by the user. This includes computer pro-
grammed training with its development and maintenance.
8-24
-------
• EPA Operations, Planning and Management Support; Management
and planning data processing that is not a part of a formal
system, data procurement support (e.g., benchmarks, computer
I
I
I processing, comparisons, etc.)*
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-25
-------
DETAILED DIVISION ACCOUNT CODE INFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATION REPORTS
8-26
-------
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10/31/76
EECJEC1 INFOBHA1ION EEECfT
EPA/KIDSE TIME SHAEING SERVICES MANAGEFEM SYS3EM
SEFV1CE: B1E EEGIN DATE: 77/03 EMC EATI:
EfCJECT: CJVII RIGHT COMPLIANCE TRACKING SYSTEM (OCROA)
SYS3EM:
EEA CBG: .. MANAGEMENT DIVISION
EGB EIH: UEGICKAL SOEFCB1
HAKAGEE: STBAIN,JOC¥ A
EEA/BtGION 5
220 S DEABECBK
CHICAGO
SI
USES:
OSES:
DSEE:
GEBLEVE,JAKES F
EfA/EEGICK 5
230 S CEAEBCBK SI
CBICAGO
AEBAYTIS,JCK A
EEA/BIGICN 5
230 £ DEABECEh SI
CHICAGO
KING,IEBCY C
EEA/iEGICN 5
23C £ DEABECBK SI
CHICAGO
PECYNAfHAYNE I
EEA/trGION 5
220 £ DEAhECh^ SI
CHICAGO
-5MA£F
IL 60604
(312) 353-206E
5MADP
IL 60604
(312) 352-2061
IL 60604
(312) 353-232C
SctUA
(312) 352-2C65
KEY DIST
PAGE
BT£
90540CBI
905UOi
5TX21!
(fSOE)
CODES BEF L(
JFG C
JQA 0
LCK L
IL
352-2C65
SMADf
IL 60604
IBIS PAGE IS PABT Of A PACKAGE Ci EBOJEC1 INPOBBATICN BEECB3S
EICVIDEt EVERY THC KONTHS ON A &CUTINE EASIS TO ALL ADF
CCCBCINATOES. PEEVIOUS COPIES OE THIS fCSM SHOULD EE CESTECYED.
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10/31/78
P B 0 J i C 1 INfOEMAllON i E F C B I
EPA/MICSt 11HE ShAfciNG SEBVJCES HANAGEtENl SSS1EH
Elf EEG1M BA1E: 77/05 ESD CA1E;
PEBSCNAL PECPEB1Y SYSTEM,BEGICN 5,CHICAGO
SERVICE
EECJIC1
S5S1EK
Eerscnal Property System
EEA CBGJ .. MANAGEHEM DIVISION
FGK JIM: BEGICKAL MAKAGEMEN1
BAKAGEfi: EEEOfcOWSKI, VIC L
EEA/BEG1CK V
230 £ EEAtBCBK SI
CHICAGO
0£*£: GEELEVE,JAKES F
EEA/BEGICN 5
230 S LEA5ECKK SI
Chj.CAGC
DSE&: SllLI,NChMA!i C
EEA/BEG10N 5
230 £ CEABECBt; SI
ChlCAGO
DSEB: DlEEBl^iEBIIN H
EFA/BEGICN 5
230 S DEABECfi* SI
CfclCAGC
USES: fEDCEOWSKI, ViC 1
EEA/BEG10N V
230 S BEABBCBl. SI
CHICAGO
1L
(312) 353-2065
5 MACE
il bOfcCU
(312) 353* 20^~i
ECCM 1151
IL
6060U
(312) 353-2061
-5KACP
IL 60604
(312) 353-2G47
ELOOB 14
IL 6060U
(312) 353-2C47
KEY BIST
PAGE
fcTP
90540PE:
10012
905UOI
51A2H
(VLf)
CODES BEF LC
JFG J
LSO L
HHD H
VLF V]
ItIS PAGE IS PAB1 01 A PACKAGE CE EFCJEC1 ItiiOBHATICN BEECBIS
EiCVIDEI EVERY 1WC f.ONTHS ON A BCU1INE EASIS TO ALL ADE
CCCBC1NATOBS. PEEVIOUS COPIES CE IHIS ECB8 SHOULD EE CES1BCYED,
-------
1
1
^^r
1
|
••
I
1
1
I
|
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
10/21/76 PROJECT I
EPA/MIDSE TIME
SIEV1CE: RTP
fECJICT: BSUP REGIONAL SUPPOE
SKSTEfi:
EEA CEG: .. EANAGEHINX DIVISION
EGF I1B: EEGIChAL MANAGEMENT
HAKAGEE: DIPER'I , MEBLIN H
EEA/8£GICK 5
230 £ EE&BECBK SI
CHICAGO 1
DSEE: HILLEB,GIBALD C (
EES/EEG10N 5 S
230 S DEAEECBt SI
CHICAGO 1
QSEfc: DIPhBl,HEBlIH H (
EEA/BiGION 5
230 S DEAEECBK SI
CEICAGC I
tSEE: PilBIE, JAMES (
EPA / REGION 5 5
230 £ DEAEBCBK SI
CEICiGO I
DSEE: EC£S,S1UAB1 C (
EEA/BEGIOK 5
230 £ DEABECBB SI
CHICAGO I
1EIS PAGE IS PAE1 01 A EACKA
EECVID1C EVERY TRC fCNTHS ON
CCOEDINATOES. PREVIOUS COPI
NFOSBATJON EEPCfT
1IME SH&EING SEBVICES HAMAGEKEN1 S1S1EM
bEGIN DATE: 74/05 £KD CI1I: /
(312) 353-^C61
-5MADE
IL 60604 KE1" DIST
(312) 35.--2G62
SOCK 1156
IL 60604
(312) 352 2G61 K
5KADP
IL 60604
(iTS) 353^2065
5MABP
IL 60604
(312) 353-2065
-5 IS A DP
IL 60604
PAGE
BTP
90540BSI
90540i
5TA2 1^
(MHD)
CODES BEt LO
GOM G
MUD M
PZJ P:
SCK SC
PACKAGE C* PEOJEC1 INiOBHATICN BEECEtlS
-------
I
1
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
10/31/76
SEBV1CE:
FBCJEC3:
F B 0 J E C I INJ.OBKATION i £ E C E T
EPA/MILS£ IIHE SHABING SEB17ICES MANAGEEEN1 SSS1EH
PAGE
EEA CBG:
EGK EIB:
tiANAGEB:
USEB:
QSEE:
OSEfc
U S E B :
USEE:
8CC
CSC CCNIBACTS
.. MANAGEMENT DIVISION
BEGICKAI SDFPCB1
EEGIS DA1I: 78/03 EKD BA1I: /
wcc
cscc
STEAIN,JUDi A
EPA/BEGION 5
230 S DEABBCBK SI
CHICAGO
CCKf SCIENCE COBP
6565 AKLIKG'IO^ B1VD
FALLS CKUECH
DIPEB1,KESIIN K
EfA/BEGICN 5
230 £ DEAHBCHS SI
CEICAGO
SIBAIN^UDY A
EFA/BEGION 5
230 S DEABECBK SI
CHICAGO
SINGH,KAGHO
CCME. SCIENCE COBt
AELIKG10N ELVT
FALLS CliUBCB
BC£S,S1UABT C
EFA/BEGION 5
230 S CEAEECBK ST
CHICAGO
(312) 353-2C6E
- 5MAUP
IL 60604 KEY DIST
(703) 533-8877
VA 22046
(512) 353-2061 K
-5J5ADP
IL 60604
(312) 355 2065
IL 60604
(705) 500-8877
VA 22046
(312) 355-2C65
-5MACP
IL 60604
90540C
5TX215
(MOB)
CODES BE* LO
DSD D,
KHD ML
MOE ilO
RSG
SCB SCI
I
I
3KIS PAGE IS PAB1 OE A FACKAGE CE EBOJEC3 INEOBHATICN BEECBIS
JEICVIDEE EVEEY TSC ECNTfaS ON A BCUIINE EASIS TO ALL ADF
CCCBDINA10BS. PBEVIOUS COPIES CF THIS FCB« SHOULD EE EES1BCYED,
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10/31/76
PEOJEC1 INFOBMA1IOH EEFCF1
EPA/MIDSC 1I«E SHABING SERVICES HANAGEKENT SYS1EH
SERVICE: iCC
PBCJECT: DCCUMEfil CCNTEOL SYSTEM
S1S1EM:
EEA CBG: .. MANAGEMENT DIVISION
EGK E1H: EEGICKAL SOfPCKl
HAKAGEB: TILLEY,LOU Vi
EFA/EEJION 5
2oU S DEAtJCEU SI
CHICAGO
USER: T1LLEY,10U «
EEA/fcEJION 5
230 S DEABDCRli SI
CHICAGO
DSEE: KATSDHA,APilL
EE&/EEG10N 5
230 S DEAEBCRK SI
CHICAGO
BEGIN DATE; 75/05 EKD DAli: /
PAGE
»CC
1417
1L 6060U
(312) J53 2Q22
feOCfl 1^*17
(312) -53-2022
KEY DJS1
SOSUQi
51X21^
(Lil)
CODES BEE LO
LW1
1L
60604
(3U) 353 2022
i
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
10/31/76
EEOJIC1 INJOBEA1IOS FEECET
EPA/MIDSE 1IME SHABING SEBV1CES MANAGEEENl SYS1EM
SEEVICE: HCC EEGIK DATE: 74/12 EKD DA1E:
JBCJECT: PEESGNAL PBCPBBTY SYSTEM,BEGICN 5,CHICAGO
SISaEH:
Fcrscral Picperty System
EFA CEG: .. MANAGEMENT DIVISION
EGC ELK: BEG1CNAL MAbAGEMENT
BAHACEB: FEBCBCWSKI, VJC L
EEA/BEG10N V FLCOB 14
2-30 S DEAfaECfili ST
CHICAGO IL
OSiB
(212)
KEY D1S1
(J II
EfA/BEGICN S
230 S DEABECiU ST
CHICAGO IL
(312) 353-2C61
SfiAEP
PAGE
/ WCC
PPS5
10012
9054COI
5TA214
(VLF)
CODES hEF LOG
MHD MH
6060U
C£EB: FEDOfOWSKI, VIC L
E£A/BEG10N V
230 S DEABECBb ST
CfclCAuC IL
(312) 352 2CU7
PLCOE 14
VLB VL
6060U
IfcIS PAGE IS PAB1 01 A EACKAGE Ci FBOJ-EC1 INIOBHA1ICN BEfCElS
JECVIDEC EVERY 1VC tONTHS ON A &C01INE EASIS TO ALL ADE
CCCBEINA10ES. PBEVIOOS COPIES OF liiiS ECBH SHOULD EE DES1BCYED,
-------
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
10/31/76
P B 0 J E C T 1NFOBKAIION FEFCBT
£PA/M1DS£ TIME SHARING SERVICES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PAGE
SZBV1CE: iCC BEGIN DATE: 75/09 EKD DATE: / fcCC
PBCJEC1: STREAM MODELING 6 TREATMENT MODELING SFIK5
SYSTEM:
STCBET: STOEAGE AND RETRIEVAL Of WATEB QUALITY AND POIFT SGUECI DATA 1003^
IPA CBG
MANAGEMENT DIVISION
FGK ILK: WTB FCLOTN SCUEcE
MANAGES: BBANECN,JCEL
EPA/BEG10N 5
230 £ DEABdCRS SI
CHICAGO
OSEE: CHANG, T P
IN Sib FOL CNTEL ED
13JO fcESI KICfclGAh
IKDIANAirCLIS
DSEB: JACCBS/E
IN ST& POL CNTL EC
1330 KES1 MICHIGAN
INDIANAPOLIS
I
1158
60604
(312) 35j 2C65
KEY DIST
(317) 633 5463 S
IN 46207
(317) 633 5482 S
IN
U6207
905UOO
2BE148
(AA3)
CODES iiEF LOC
AAA A£
33J 33
IEIS PAGE IS PABI Of A PACKAGE 01 PBOJECT INfOBMATICN BEFCBTS
EJEOVIDEE EVERY T«C tCNTHS ON A BCUIINE E2SIS TC ALL ADF
CCOED1NATOBS. PBEV10US COPIES OE THIS ECBM SHOULD E£ DESTBCYED
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
10/31/76
F E 0 J E C I IKJOBKATION E E F C * T
EPA/MIDSE HUE SHAE1NG SEBVICES MANAGEEEN1 S1S1EH
PAGE
BEGIN DATE: 76/03 EKD DA1E:
S1ATE OF fciSCONSIN
SEFVICI: «CC
PBCJECI: 21«1S
SISIEB:
SICfiET: STORAGE AND BE1EIEVAL 01 WATER QUALITY AMD POIK1 SCUECE DATA
/ fcCC
S211
EFA CEG: .. MANAGEMENT DIVISION
fGK ELH: WTB CUM INPO SYSTEM
HAKAGEF: BEANCCN,JOEL
EPA/BEGION 5
230 E DEABBCfil* ST
CHICAGO
C£E£: YARGEE,DANA
DEFT NA1UFA1 IES
F.C. BOX 7S21
MAIUSCN
t£EB: UNGCHUSal^ORAEAT
DEPT NATUEAI fES
P.C. BOX 7921
MADISCN
USEE: ST JCHH,TED E
DEFT NATUBAL EfcS
P.C. BOX 7921
HACISCd
ROOM 1158
11 60604
(608) 266 6965 £
hi 53707
(608) 266 88^1 S
«I 53707
(t>08) 266-OU6C £
hi 53707
(312) 353-2065
KEY DIST
10034
905UOC
2I3E146
(AAB)
COCES REE LOl
DBY Cl
OOU 00
TBS TE:
TKIS PAGE IS PABT Of A PACKAGE CE FEQJEC3 INFOEMATICN BEFCB1S
EFCVIDEE EVE&Y TWO KCNTHS ON A KCUTINE EASIS 10 ALL ADP
CCCBEINATOES. PREVIOUS COPIES 01 THIS FCBM SHOULD EE CES1BCYED.
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
10/31/76 P B 0 J E C 1 INfOBBAlION BEECfT PAGE
EPA/M1CSE II BE SHARING SEBVICES BANAGEtENl SYS1EH
SEEV3CE: WCC £EGIN DATE: 75/09 EKD EA1E: / fc'CC
fiCJICI: BATEB POLLUIICN CCNTKOL (HINNEAPCIIS, HINN) HPH5
SSS1EM:
SICBEl: STOBAGE AND BE1B1EVAL OF HA1EB QUALITY AND E01K1 SOURCE DATA 1003U
EPA CfiG: .. flAKAGEHENT DIVISION 905UCC
EGE ELM: «Tfi PCLUTN SOlfiCE SURVLNC 2BE148
HASAGEE: BBANECN,JCEL (312) 353-2065 (AAB)
EEA/EEGION 5 BOOM 1158
230 S DtABBCBK 51
CHICAGO IL 6060U KEY DIS1 CODES 6EF LOl
CSIB: TF1PEIEB,DAIE J (612) 296-738C S DJT D.
BIN PCLL CCNTFOL AGY
1935 fc COUNTY kD E2
RCSEVILLE MN 55113
GSEE: JA&OCH^AKBENCL A (612) 296 7355 £ LBJ LB
KIN PCLL CCN1FCL AGY
1935 W COUK1Y KD £2
ROSEV1LLE MN 55113
DEEfi: LINDBEtoG,HARGITTA G (612) 296 7217 E HGL i/LGl
BIN £CLL CCNTFOL AGY
1935 H CODN1Y KD E2
6GSEVILIE Hh 55113
DSIB: BADEi,PAl&lCK G (612) 296 7238 £ PGfl PGK
BIN EC1L CCK1FOL AGY
1935 W COUNTY BD E2
BOSEVILLE MN 55113
USES: BEYEE,SHABCN C (b12) 296 72C4 £ SDH SDH
BIN FCLL CCNTfOL AGY
1935 fe COtNlY ED E2
BCSEV111E i3K 55113
\
> IhlS PAGi IS PAfal 01 A PACKAGE Ci tBOJECl INfOBHATICN BEiCBIS
PfOVIDED EVERY TWO PONTHS ON A BCUTINE EISIS TO ALL ADF
CCCBEIMATOBS. PBEVJOUS COPIES OF 1HIS ECBM SHODLD EE DES1BCYED,
-------
I
I
I
f
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
10/51/7€
SEF17ICE:
EBCJEC5:
SJS1EH:
Efi CBG:
EG* IIH:
BASAGEE:
P B 0 J E C 1 IhFOBWAlIOS B E P C E 1
EPA/KJCSI 11ME SHAB1NG SEBT/1CES BANAGJEEENI SXS1EM
PAGE
HCC
REGIONAL SUFPCBI
EEGIK DAIi:
BliC EA1I
KCC
BSOP
USEE
OSES
DSEE
CSEfi
OSIB:
... IMMED CFC, MAKAGEMEN1 D1VISIOK
REGICKAL SUfFCEI
BOOM 1158
II 60604
EFA/EEG1CN 5
250 S UiAKECBK SI
CHICAGO
MIILEB,GEBAID C
EFS/tiEGICN 5
230 £ DEABECIU SI
CHICAGO
JAf ES F
EEA/EEG1CN 5
250 S EEABECE^• SI
CEICAGC
AEfiAXIIS,JCK A
EEA/EEGICK 5
230 £ DEAEiiCEF SI
CEICAGO
CHAIKAN,KAlfcIhA L
EEA/iEGION 5
230 £ DEAiiEtfi* SI
CHICAGO
VAENES,1IMKIE E
EEA/8EGICN 5
230 £ DEAfitCBIi SI
CBICAGO
AEAM£,MAKSHA I
EEA/EEGICN 5
250 S EZAEECfit* SI
CHICAGO
DIPEBl^MEBlIN H
EEA/EEG1GN* 5
230 £ DEAEtCtU SI
CfilCAGO
(312) 355-2065
KEY DIS1
BOOM 1158
1L 60604
(312) 353-2C65
IL 6060U
(312) J55-2C61
IL 60604
(312) 355 147 S
1153
IL
(312) 355-2061
BOOM 1120
IL 60604
(312) 353 2065
BOOK 900
IL 60604
(512) 353-2061 H
-5MACP
IL 60604
905410
51X215
(AAB)
COEES EEf LOG
COM GO
JFG JFi
A JCJ.
KLC KLC
LEV LEV
HAA
HHD »UC
ItIS PAGE IS PAB1 01 A PACKAGE C* PFOJiCl IMFOBHATICN BEECB1S
tICVIDEC EVEBY TKC CCN1HS ON A BCOIINE BASIS 1C ALL ADE
CCCBEINA10BS. PBEVJOUS COPIES Of THIS ICBM SHOULD EE EES1BCYED.
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
8
10/21/76
SEBVJCE
FBCOIC1
£Y£1£M
PfiOJICl IN-FOBKAIION fffCil
EPA/MIBSC TIME SHAE1NG SEBVICES HANAGEKEN1 SXS1EM
PAGE
WCC
BEGJCNA1 SGEPCfil
EiGIN DA!!;
END £A1I
WCC
ESUP
ESh CBC: ... IMBED CfC, MANAGEMENT DIVISION
IIH: EEGICKAL SUEECET
MAKAC-EB:
CSEB:
D£EB
USEB
EEA/BLG10N 5
230 S CEAfaBCfiF SI
CHICAGO
PET&IE,JAMES
EFA / BEGICK 5
230 £ DEABECKK SI
CEICAbC
EC£S,SIUAH1 C
EEA/EhGION 5
230 £ CiABBCBK SI
CHICAGO
PECYKA^KAYKE £
EEA/BEGICN 5
230 £ DEAFECKl* SI
CHICAGO
&CCM 1158
1L 60604
(F1S)
5HACE
(512) 355-2C65
KEY DIST
905410
51X215
(AAB)
CODES BEF LOG
PZJ PZ
1L
6060^
352 20€5
set sci
- 5MADP
II 60604
(j12) J53-2C65
StiADE
II 6060U
SDP SDP
ItIS PAGE IS PAB1 01 A PACKAGE Gt PBGJEC1 INfOfiflAlICN fe£ECH!lS
EfC\lDEE EVERY TfcC fCNIHS ON A BCU1INE EASIS TO ALL ADE
CCCEEIKATOBS. PEEVIOUS COPIES 01 1HIS fCEM SHODID EE EE£1BCYED.
-------
1
1
1
10/31/7£ £ E C J
EPA/HIES
SERVICE: HCC
FfiCJICT: REGICN 5 - Gfi
GEAK1S INFCKMAIIGN AKC
EEA CBG: ... IttiilB OFC
1 C I INF
1 1IHE SHAB1
BE
ANIS INFO-tidAlI
CCN1BGL SYSli
0 t K A
NG SEBV
GIN DAI
ON AN£
A
I
£
C
, aANAGEH^Kl DIVIS10K
FGt UK: BEGICNAL SUfPCfil
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EAKAGEfi: ERANECh,JCEI
EFA/EtGICN 5
230 £ DEAESCB
CHICAGO
USEfi: PAT RICK, ALT HZ
EEA/EEGICN 5
230 S DEABBCB
CHICAGO
DSEE: KYEBS, ASNElIi,
EFA/fiEGICK 5
230 £ DEABECB
CfcIC AGC
U£EB: GEELEVE, JAKES
EFA/EEGION 5
230 £ EEAEECB
CHICAGO
U£EE: VABNIfa,LIHt:iE
EFA/BEGIOK 5
230 £ DEABECB
CtlCAGO
DSEE: DIFEB1,«EBIIN
EFA/BEGION 5
230 S DEAfiECiJ
CHICAGO
BOOK 1
F SI
11
A C (^12)
FLCOB
b SI
IL
J (312)
fa co a 9
l> SI
IL
F (312)
5MAL>£
^ si
IL
E (312)
BOOM 1
li SI
IL
H (312)
-5MADP
» SI
IL
15t
60604
353- 14 C
11
60604
353- 147
00
60604
353 206
60604
353-20€
120
60fa04
353- 20€
60604
C
C
C
1
1
EEFCfT
PAGE
CSEfi: LE£,BCBES1 E
EiA/REGICK 5
230 £ EEABLCBK SI
CBICAGO
D£IB: PECYKA,WAYNE E
EFA/fiEGION 5
230 £ CEAbECB*> SI
CHICAGO
(312) 353-2C65
KEY DIST
(312) 35J-21UC
ILCCB 11
IL
IL
60604
353 2065
60604
/ HCC
WFNK
10011
905U 10
5TX2 15
(AAB)
CODES BEF LOG
ACF AC
AJH AJf
JFG JFG
LEV LEV
MHD HHC
WDP WDF
IBIS PAGE IS PAfil Oi A PACKAGE CF FEOJEC1 IKFOBttATICN BEFCB1S
tICVlDEE EVERY IfcO tONlHS ON A HC011NE EASJS 10 ALL ADE
CCCBCINA10BS. PBEVIOUS COPIES Ck THIS fCBM SHOULD EE EES1BCYED.
-------
I
I
I
PKCJEC1 lldiOiKAlJON BEPCtl
EPA/MICSE TIME SHARING SEBVICIS MANAGEEEN1 SYS1EM
SIE\1CE: WCC EEGIN DJ1E: 77/08 ZkD EA1E: /
EBCJIC1: MC£E1 SlAlf IfciOHMATION SYSTEM; HA1EB SUPPLY
SXS1EH:
PAGE
vcc
HSIS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E*A C5G: EA1A EBCCESSJNG ERANCfc
EGt IIB: REGIONAL SCEPCfil
BAKAGEB: S16A1N,JODY A
EEA/BiGIOK 5
230 S DEABECfiti SI
USEE
GEBLZVE, JAMES I
23C £ DEAEBCEf SI
CK1CAGO
SMACt
606QU
KEY DIS1
(j12) 35^-2065
5MADP
905470
51X2 15
(HOB)
CODES B.tt LOG
««'««»*»- ««MW' fc*>W«V
Jf G JF
IL
60fcOa
1EIS PAGE JS PAfcT Of A PACKAGE Ci EECJEC1 IKfO£HAlICN BEECB1S
EfCVIDEE EVEhY IfcC tONIHS OW A BCOllNE EASIS 10 ALL ADE
CCCECINA10BS. PEEV10US COPIES Of 1KIS fCBM SHOULD EE DES1ECYED.
------- |