ENVIRONMENTAL
     PROTECTION
          AGENCY
            5«S»
      3)
      \
             11]
   AIR, RADIATION, NOISE
    FISCAL YEAR 1980

     ZB B B U DG E|Env5ronm:entel Protection A3
              Region V, I 'i:-~ „•'
              Chicago, i^^- C,^.,.-i
      OMB SUBMISSION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

-------
ENVLV

-------
                                           100R80002
                AIR QUALITY MEDIA



                    CONTENTS


                                         PAGE

A.   MEDIA RESOURCE SUMMARY	        1

B.   MEDIA OVERVIEW	       2

C.   MEDIA RANKING	      13

D.   BUDGET REQUEST BY DECISION UNIT      17

E.   DECISION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS AND
     LEVELS

          RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT..      23

          ABATEMENT AND CONTROL	     125

          ENFORCEMENT	     222

-------
                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                       FY 1980 OMB REQUEST
                               Air
                     Media Resource Summary
                             FY 1979           FY 1980           Change
                                     (dollars in thousands)
Research & Development
Permanent Positions	     430               446             +16
Budget Authority	  57;765.8          76,412.5        +18,646.7

Abatement & Control

Permanent Positions	     964               980             +16
Budget Authority	 155,905.8        187,161.8        +31,256.0

Enforcement

Permanent Positions	       609              652              +43
Budget Authority	    30,652.7         34,275.2         +3,622.5
Total

Permanent Positions	    2,003            2,078              +75
Budget Authority	  244,324.3        297,849.5         +53,525.2
                                                                      OOC1

-------
                            AIR MEDIA OVERVIEW
    I.   OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY

         The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 define the-requirements for
    EPA and State/local air pollution control activities for 1980.   Although
    the amendments continue the basic strategy of the 1970 law for  the
    control of air pollution (i.e., protection of public health is  to be
    assured through attaining and maintaining ambient air quality standards
    by specified deadlines), they specify, the procedural steps that the
    States and EPA must follow in implementing the legislation and  limit the
    discretionary authority of EPA and the States in many areas.  The Act
    provides for severe economic sanctions if State Implementation  Plans
    (SIPS) are not revised, including'a prohibition on the growth of sta-
    tionary  sources subsequent to July 1, 1979.

         Accordingly, the program emphasis for FY 1980 continues  to focus on
    attaining and maintaining National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
    which in general, are to be attained by 1982.  For areas which  do not
    attain the standards for photochemical oxidants and carbon monoxide, and
    which have difficult control problems (which  preclude attainment by
    1982), the standards will have to be attained between 1983 and  1987.  FY
    1979 efforts will concentrate on revising State Implementation  Plans to
    meet-the- schedule -set— forth -in---the-1977 -Amendments (i.e.-, revisions are
    to be submitted by January 1, 1979,  and approved/disapproved  by
    July 1, 1979).   However,  the January SIP submittals will not  complete
    the SIP development process.  Apart from the  legislatively mandated SIP
    submittals in 1982 for areas unable to attain standards for oxidants and
    carbon monoxide, major efforts in SIP development activity in 1980 are
    necessary:

           • ' Regulations must be adopted in 1980 for additional  sources of
              volatile organic chemicals pursuant to EPA control  technology
              guidance.

           •  Analytic assessments of particulate emission sources  must be
              completed and necessary regulations adopted.

           •  Inspection and Maintenance (I&M) requirements must  be added
              following State legislative action.

           •  SIP revisions for the 40 to 50 additional areas expected to be
              classified as nonattainment areas during 1979 must  be devel-
              oped.

         The development of 1982 SIPs will focus  on analyzing transportation
    control measures and the impact of those measures on air quality,  on
    encouraging public participation in review and response to those analy-
OOC2

-------
ses, and on translating commitments to act into enforceable schedules
and regulations.  Control actions which lead to standards attainment are
basically the responsibility of the State and local governments. The law
requires that they take on increased responsibilities for air pollution
control, particularly in the case of motor vehicle related pollutants.
The Amendments, in Section 174, specifically require a designated
"organization of elected officials of local governments" to participate
in developing an implementation plan.  Particular emphasis is given to
involving local or regional planning organizations in the plan develop-
ment and Implementation process.

     In addition to the provisions related to attainment of ambient air
quality standards, the Amendments established a statutory basis for
prevention of significant deterioration of air quality (PSD) and a
national goal for visibility protection; these provisions also require
EPA studies and regulatory action.  Additional PSD-related actions (for
hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, lead, and carbon monoxide) will be taken
in 1980.  The States will adopt SIP revisions related to PSD for sulfur
oxides and particulates and submit for EPA review and approval/dis-
approval during 1980.

     The stationary source air enforcement program is designed to
utilize effectively the enforcement authorities of the Clean Air Act, as
amended in 1977, to ensure nationwide compliance with State Implementa-
tion Plans (SIPs),.New Source-Performance Standards (NSPS), and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).  EPA's sta-
tionary source enforcement program ensures compliance by all major
sources, contributes to the resolution of attainment problems, imple-
ments Clean Air Act provisions relating to sources issued prohibition
orders by the Department of Energy under the Energy Policy and Conser-
vation Act, and enforces SIPs, NSPS, and NESHAP requirements to support
and stimulate State efforts.

     The Clean Air Act Amendments have created new enforcement programs
as well as expanding EPA's responsibilities in existing enforcement
activities.  The accelerated enforcement effort has altered the basic
enforcement approach in dealing with major source violators.  EPA and
States may no longer establish compliance schedules for major violators
through the administrative order process, but must establish these
schedules through judicial action.  The Act gives EPA new authority
to seek civil penalties, and this authority will be used in civil
actions to create an incentive for compliance.  In addition, EPA or a
delegated State is required under Section 120 to give notice of non-
compliance to major sources by July 1, 1979,  or 30 days after discovery
of the violation, whichever is later,  and to establish a penalty for
continued noncompliance.
     EPA has the lead responsibility for the enforcement of the Fed-
erally promulgated emission standards.  However, both Section 111, New
                                                                     OOC3

-------
Source Performance Standards (NSPS), and Section 112, National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) provide for State en-
forcement of all or any portion of these standards.  EPA continues to
place a high priority on delegating enforcement authority for NSPS and
NESHAP to the States.  EPA actively monitors the enforcement of these
standards to assure national consistency as required by the Act.

     The 1977 Amendments require New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) be set on a specified schedule, emission standards be set for new
motor vehicles and engines, and assessments related to standard-setting
be carried out.  Furthermore, the NAAQS are to be reviewed every five
years, and procedures established for assuring utilization of local
sources of coal, preassessing the economic impacts of regulatory ac-
tions.  These measures will result in the promulgation of a large number
of NSPS between. 1980 and 1982; moreover, some SIPs may need to be re-
vised when the review of NAAQS indicates that changes are due and when
additional pollutants are controlled (e.g., radioactive substances).

     The research program will continue to explore the relationship of
airborne pollutants to adverse health and environmental effects, identi-
fy the sources of these pollutants and the manner in which they are
transformed and transported through the environment to man, and develop
and evaluate efficient, cost effective pollutant control devices.  Ef-
forts will be devoted to improving our ability to measure air pollution
in a more precise and uniform manner.

     Studies on the adverse health effects of air pollution will provide
an improved data base to support the periodic review and revision of
National Ambient Air Quality Standards required by the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1977.  Research on the effects of pollutants from auto-
motive and other sources not currently regulated will allow the Agency
to determine which of these substances pose a sufficient threat to the
public health to warrant regulation.

     Research will be expanded substantially in FY 1980, as part of our
preventive public health initiative, to strengthen the data base on
which costly regulatory decisions are made, ensuring that standards are
neither too lax nor too stringent, and are legally defensible.  Atten-
tion will focus on epidemiology (the necessary link between the labora-
tory and the real world), rapid screening techniques, and chronic toxico-
logical studies which most nearly approximate the pattern of human
exposure to air pollution.

     Research to characterize pollutant emissions from various sources
and industrial control systems will continue to support the formulation
of New Source Performance Standards and will provide data to evaluate
State Implementation Plans.  We will continue the development and de-
ployment  of inhalable particle samplers, leading to the establishment

-------
of an operating network in 1981.  In addition,  we will perform analyses
of visibility measurements in National Parks pursuant to the require-
ments of Section 127 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.

     The new motor vehicles emissions control program is essentially a
headquarters activity.  Increased emphasis is being given,  pursuant to
Clean Air Act mandates, to tightening emission control requirements for
heavy duty vehicles and to presently unregulated pollutants, such as
particulate matter.  The program incorporates a shift in emphasis to
assure that in-use vehicles meet standards.  Standards and studies required
by the Clean Air Act Amendments receive the highest priority.  We will
also place more emphasis on providing supportive data on inspection and
maintenance programs.

     Mobile source enforcement will expand the Selective Enforcement
Auditing program, to include heavy duty engines, and surveillance
activities in support of recall.  We will undertake an aggressive en-
forcement program to reduce fuel-switching and tampering, in order to
reduce in-use emissions from mobil sources in metropolitan areas experiencing
significant mobile source pollution problems which are targets for I/M.
Furthermore, this effort will support the Presidents Denver air initiative.

     We have given ambient air quality monitoring a priority consistent
with regulations developed pursuant to the Agency's Air Monitoring
Strategy.  The strategy places a high priority on improving the quality
of the data that are obtained by State and local monitoring networks.
In keeping with this priority, we will place emphasis at both the re-
gional and headquarters levels on restructuring the monitoring networks
and validating data for selected monitoring stations identified as
representing ambient trends.  We will deemphasize however,  the need
for large amounts of data from relatively less important monitoring stations.


II.  RANKING CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES

     The ranking criteria for the Air programs  are as follows:

       •  Relationship of the program activity to attainment of primary
          air quality standards and health protection.

       •  State rather than Federal program implementation.

       •  Legislative requirements.

       »  Public perception of the environmental problems.

       %  National  needs related to energy conservation and  development,
          and proper use of governmental as well as private resources.
                                                                    OOC5

-------
    III.  REQUEST SUMMARY

                                            FY 1980 Total     Change From FY 1979
                                            PFT  BA$(000)     PFT        BA$(000)

    Abatement and Control	    980  187,161.8    +16        +31,256.0
          Emission Standards &
            Technology Assessment 	    121   30,975.3     -         +15,000.0

          The FY 1980 increase provides for setting New Source Performance
    Standards pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, and for the
    issuance of control technique documents for the control of emissions of
    ozone precursors under the SIPs.  Work on the setting of NESHAP will be
    continued, with emphasis on sources of bezene,  arsenic, POM, asbestos,
    and selected other organic substances.
                                                                                «»
          Energy and Pollutant Strategies
            Development 	     42    2,540.0

          Substances suspected of being carcinogenic will be defined and
    regulatory programs initiated.  National Ambient Air Quality Standards
    for 864 and particulates will be reviewed and revised, as necessary.
    Economic assessment of various regulatory actions  will be conducted.

          State Programs Guidelines and
            Regulation Development 	     97    5,911.0

          The FY 1980 program emphasizes technical support for control
    strategy development in relation to 1979-1982 State Implementation Plan
    revisions for carbon monoxide and oxidants and for new or revised
    National Ambient Air Quality Standards.  This emphasis includes:  (1) an
    intensification of activities related to the development, field testing
    and use of improved air quality models for HC/NOX control in relation
    to the ozone standard; and (2) improved analytical and consultative
    capabilities to overview the development and implementation of trans-
    portation planning requirements.

          Mobile Sources Standards
            and Guidelines 	    132   14,369.7

          The FY 1980 program emphasis will be on completion of the studies
    and emission standards mandated by the Clear Air Act Amendments of 1977
    and a continuation of increased technical support of State and local
    implementation of motor vehicle emissions inspection and maintenance
    programs under the SIPs.  Standards development includes statutory
    emission standards for heavy duty vehicles for gaseous emissions, and
    emission standards for particulates emitted from both light duty and
    heavy duty vehicles.  The program will also emphasize the development
    of controls aimed at reducing emissions from inuse vehicles by deter-
    mining inuse emissions under actual operating and ambient conditions,
    and developing appropriate control programs.
0006

-------
     Mobile Source Reproduction Compliance
       Verification	  109    4,765.0

     The FY 1980 program will focus on:  implementing improvements in
the certification process, such as increased use of ADP; improvements in
the control requirements to better assure in-use vehicle compliance with
emission standards (e.g., implementation of the parameter adjustment
regulations); and on implementation of the requirements of the Clean Air
Act Amendments of 1977, such as the control of hazardous emissions.  The
program will be assuring compliance with more stringent emission standards
for both light duty and heavy duty vehicles, for exhaust as well as
evaporative emissions.  In addition, special attention will be placed on
the newly emerging electronic technology used for controlling emissions
and motor vehicles' operating parameters.  There is no provision for
fuel economy compliance activities.

     Air Quality Management	  347    9,235.1  +16           +633.7

     The principal emphasis in FY 1980 will be follow-up and Implementation
of the SIP schedules submitted in 1979.  This includes:  Action on State
developed RACT regulations for 16 new VOC source categories; the I/M
schedules for 50 areas; analyses of the 100 MPOs funded under section
175; and fugitive dust control schedules for 68 urban areas and 151
smaller areas, and control measures for these sources.  Other State-
developed SIP revisions will be reviewed and approved/disapproved as
submitted; this will include any State developed PSD and lead plans.

     A major initiative will be undertaken to complete SIPs in non-
attainment areas not completed in FY 1979.  Policy  and program guidance
to the States in the development of short-term N02  SIPs and on the
development of visibility protection plans will be  provided.

     Trends Monitoring and Progress
      Assessment	   43    2,020.9

     For FY 1980, major emphasis will be placed on  continuing efforts
(begun in FY 1979) to implement the five year program to establish the
National Air Monitoring Network required by section 319 of the Act and
to implement the structural and qualitative improvements recommended by
SAMWG and promulgated as EPA monitoring regulations.  Also included are
initiation of on-site audit§ of selected National Air Monitoring Stations
(NAMS) to assure adherence to EPA performance criteria, and expansion of
systems.

     Ambient Air Quality
       Monitoring	   89     2,344.8    -           +122.3

     The major thrust of the FY 1980 program is to  evaluate monitoring
networks and individual stations for purposes of designating a national
network (NAMS) and State network (SLAMS) and to negotiate schedules for
completion of these networks.  The submission and validation of data
from the States will continue.  The minimum required quality assurance
program including auditing of individual sites and  State laboratories

                                                                        0007

-------
     will receive increased attention in order to determine the quality of
     data used for SIP revisions and regulatory decisions.  The Regions will
     coordinate necessary daily reporting of air quality in all major urban
     areas greater than 500,000 by the end of 1980.  The Regions will continue
     their involvement in special monitoring studies for criteria and non-
     criteria pollutants both in quality assurance and sample collection.

          Financial Support to State and
            Local Agencies	   -    90,000.0   -        +15,000.0

          The FY 1980 program will continue the support of air pollution control
     agencies and provide adequate funding for States to meet the commitments
     outlined in their 1979 SIP submittals for:  1) VOC regulations; 2) fugitive
     dust analyses and regulation; 3) TCM measures, and 4) I/M.  In addition,
     the increase will support the required data acquisition on air quality and
     emissions leading to submission of approval SIPs in 1982 for those areas
     given attainment date extension for CO and 03.  SIP development for N02 and
     lead will be undertaken in all nonattalament areas.  Visibility protection
     programs will be started in all areas.  All States willing to undertake
     new source review programs will have funds available for PSD activities.
     Data collection (monitoring, emission inventories) will be undertaken for
     SIPs for the one hour standard for N02 in major urban areas.  Quality
     assurance programs will be optimized for all urban areas.  Additional
     monitoring sites will be upgraded to SLAMS standards with emphasis on 03,
     CO, and N02 in. urban areas.  Increased State involvement in enforcement will
     be possible on new regulations with widespread activity on VOC sources,
     initiation of work on fugitive dust sources and delegation of NSPS and
     NESHAPS, and new source review responsiblities.  Increasing numbers of
     States would develop enforcement programs on non-leaded fuels, in-use vehicles,
     hazardous pollutants and continuous monitoring.

          Grants for Planning Carbon
            Monoxide and Photochemical
            Oxidant Control	        25,000.0

          The FY 1980 emphasis is on completing funding of the more than 100
     organizations of local elected officials with responsibility for planning
     transportation-related measures of the State Implementation Plan
     for areas not attaining the photochemical oxidants and/or carbon monoxide
     NAAQS.  These funds will supplement transportation planning funds provided
     by the Department of Transportation to the same agencies.


          Enforcement	  652   34,275.2   +43       +3,622.5
            Stationary Source
             Enforcement	  485   25,168.9   +14         +595.2

          FY 1980 efforts will include continuation of the accelerated major
     source enforcement effort; further implementation of the noncompliance
     penalty program established by the CAA amendments; assisting States in
     maintaining strong programs to ensure compliance with major sources;
     and delegating to as many States as possible the noncompliance penalty
OOC8

-------
program under section 120.  Efforts will be made to ensure compliance
with completed SIP revisions and to review proposed SIP revisions for
enforceability.  The program will also focus on expanded enforcement
responsibilities in the New Source and NESHAPs programs.

     Mobile Source Enforcement	    167   9,106.3    +29   +3,027.3

     High priority will continue to be placed on assuring that vehicles
meet emission standards at the time of sale and in-use.  Activities will
focus on continued implementation of the Selective Enforcement Auditing
assembly line testing program, recall and surveillance activity in
support of recall, and warranty enforcement.  Anti-tampering and fuel
switching enforcement will be expanded and concentrated primarily in
areas of the country with significant mobile source pollution problems.

     Research and Development	    446  76,412.5    +16   +18,646.7
       Health Effects-Transportation
       Sources	     46   7,243.0     -3    +1,418.0

     In FY 1979, the health effects research program on transportation
was redirected to accelerate obtaining data on diesel exhaust products.
A substantial portion of the FY 1980 program will concentrate on com-
pleting the important animal toxicological research on diesel exhaust
products so the regulatory program office can make decisions on granting
certificates to the manufacturers.  A significant portion of the FY 1980
resources will be used to begin field epidemiological studies on groups
occupationally exposed for extended periods to diesel exhaust products.
These studies will concentrate on relationships between exposure to
diesel exhaust and excess mortality and morbidity.  A significant por-
tion of the resources for the FY 1980 initiative will be devoted to
developing techniques to measure the health effects on commuters and
roadside pedestrians'/residents who are exposed to automobile related
pollutants.  Once developed, these techniques will be employed in
designing and conducting epidemiological studies on selected populations
exposed to different mixes of car, truck, and bus traffic.

     Health Effects-Criteria
       Pollutants	      37  10,800.0    +13    +9,000.0

     The FY 1979 program on the health effects of criteria pollutants
was substantially reduced to provide resources for research on inhalable
particulates in the noncriteria area.  This resulted in major reductions
in the level of research planned for photochemical oxidants, nitrogen
oxides, and carbon monoxide.  The FY 1980 initiative will provide resources
to perform subacute and chronic animal toxicological and human epidemi-
ological studies on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide.  The
animal toxicological studies will evaluate what health effects result
when test animals are exposed to pollutant levels and patterns closely
approximating what humans are exposed to in their daily activities.
                                                                      OOC9

-------
These studies will also determine what effects result when animals are
exposed to combinations of pollutants either simultaneously or sequen-
tially.  The epidemiological studies will measure the additional health
effects, if any, resulting -when air quality control regions approach but
do not meet the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

     Health Effects-Non-Criteria
       Pollutants	      134  19,305.0    +10       +8,950.0

     The FY 1980 program on the health effects of noncriteria pollutants
will continue the research begun in FY 1979 on inhalable particulates.
All of the animal toxicological, controlled human exposure and epidemi-
ological research that was started in FY 1979 requires equivalent FY 1980
funding because that research takes two to three years to complete.  The
FY 1980 initiative will provide resources for conducting important
health studies on sulfates and nitrates; for developing better methods
for assessing what pollutant levels the public is exposed to, both
indoors and outside; to improve the methodology for selecting epidemi-
ological study populations and sites so these studies can begin more
rapidly; and to developing better methods to assess subtle teratogenic,
mutagenic, central nervous system, immunological, and reproductive
effects from humans exposed to non-criteria air pollutants.  The final
portion of these resources will be used to begin studying the health
effects of the major components making up polycyclic organic matter.

     Ecological Processes and
       Effects	        5   2,266.0     -          -265.1

     The proposed FY 1980 research program encompasses studies to detect,
understand and predict the effects of criteria and selected non-criteria
air pollutants on the environment.  These studies provide data for
establishing or revising criteria documents for setting secondary air
quality standards and for policy and decision making concerning air
pollution control strategies.  FY 1980 research includes methods develop-
ment and the delineation of the impact of S02, NOx and photochemical
oxidants on agricultural and silvicultural crops.  Studies will assess
pollutant effects on growth, production and quality as well as metabolic
processes, nutrient cycling and soil system modifications.  Other studies
will include the impact of hydrocarbons, halogen gases and heavy metals
on plant and soil systems with regard to uptake, bioaccumulation and
fate.  An eight year study of urban photochemical oxidant impact on the
San Bernardino, California forests is entering final phases.  During FY
1979 this research program shifted from intramural to extramural efforts
due to a reduction in personnel and to attain a broad national scope to
meet agency needs.
0010

-------
     Transport and Fate	       44  11,010.0

     The FY 1980 program in air transport and fate research represents a
continuation of the FY 1979 program.  Field and laboratory investigations
will be conducted on key regulated and nonregulated pollutants including
photochemical oxidants, sulfates, nitrates, organics and fine particulates.
Large scale field studies will be conducted on the urban scale pollution
problem, e.g., Houston Air Quality Study and on the regional scale air
pollution transport problem, e.g., Sulfur Transport and Transformation
in the Environment (STATE) program.  Other studies will involve the
development and validation of air quality simulation models and the
determination of the various meteorological and pollutant parameters
that impact atmospheric visibility in major U.S. cities.

     Industrial Processes	     20   4,500.0

     An industrial air emission characterization program will be under-
taken to assist States in the revision of State Implementation Plans.
Point source emissions from approximately eight volatile organic chemical
storage and handling sites will be characterized.  A cost-benefit-risk
model will be developed to assist in decision making in the regulation
of various sources.  Control technology programs will be initiated for
critical industrial source categories identified by OAQPS as having
inadequate BACT.  A quick response, onsite technical support capability
will be provided to the Regional Offices to assist in evaluating new
source permit applications.

     Characterization and Measure-
       ment Methods Development...     63   8,532.7

     The proposed 1980 program in air characterization and measurement
methods development represents a continuation of the 1979 program.  This
program will focus on three basic categoreis of research:  ambient,
stationary and mobile.  In the ambient program, research will continue
on characterization and measurement methods development for sulfates and
other fine particulate matter.  In the stationary source program, the
research effort will support the measurement requirements for the accele-
rated New Source Performance Standards regulatory schedule mandated by
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.  In the mobile sources program,
the research effort will focus on the characterization of heavy and
light duty vehicle emissions with the primary emphasis on particulate
emissions from diesel powered vehicles.

     Monitoring Methods and
       Systems	     21   4,650.0     -         -100.0

     Air quality measurement networks are being improved and continuous
air monitoring upgraded.   The visibility measurement system will be
                                                                      0011

-------
    improved for Prevention of Significant Deterioration.  Airborne scanning
    techniques will be applied to provide data for Environmental Impact
    Statements.  Procedures will be developed for studying ambient organic
    pollutants from a mobile van.

        Technical Support	     32   3,204.8     -         -356.2

        Trace element and inorganic analyses will be performed for OAQPS
    (400,000 filters).  Special analyses of pollutants being considered for
    regulatory actions will be provided to OAQPS.  Utilization of advanced
    remote sensing instruments for atmospheric plume dispersion modeling
    will be continued.  The New'York City, Oklahoma City and Hawaii studies
    for oxidant and S02 transport will be continued.  Four stations will be
    operated in the National Forest Ozone Study area.  EPA will serve as
    collaborating center for air pollution control for the World Health
    Organization and the International Precipitation Laboratory for the
    World Meteorology Organization.  (EPA will store, retrieve, correlate
    and publish data, and provide analytical standards.)
        The reduction in program funding from the previous year will prevent
   analysis of more than 250,000 filters and will eliminate the lead and
   phosphorous analyses for enforcement of gasoline standards.  Data will
   be received from the WHO and WHO but will not be correlated or published.

        Quality Assurance	     44   4,901.0

        In quality assurance, support is provided for National, State and
   local ambient monitoring systems.  Methods will be validated, including
   the promulgation of a Federal Reference Method for Respirable Particulates.
   The method equivalency program will be continued and the quality of
   monitoring data will be assessed.
0012

-------
Z     X •—

      «- J
J     UJ Z
t     J -»
                                     OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO3OOOOOOOOO 33OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
                                     30000000000.330000000000000000000000300000003

                                                                                                                                            — s cc « :o —-•««;» -«-«
                                                                                                                                                     '-'~- a co  cc  !?• o o
                                                                                                                                      — — » f~ .o o
03OOOOOOOO3OOOOOOOOOOOOO03    S3
 •   ••••••••••••••••••••••MM*     •»
                                                  <\j'V=T>'\i.oi— r*>r\jrw-»    co •«
                                                                                              O O O    O 3 O
                                                                                               •••     •*•
                                                                                              r\j a- ru    -• — i —
                                                                                                                                                                     O O 3
                                                                                                                                                                      •••
                                                                                                                                                                     — ryj .r
03300OO3OOOOOOOOO3OOOOOO30

rv  "i M co » — .-\;«^.*;>e'V»-.'V''i'»'u7--i/i,/»r-ru:o.ot>"'i
                                                                                                                         300OO03OOO33

                                                                                                                         ^oo^o-^r-f^s-o--1^
                                                                                                                         r*l — ^ •« 
                                                  tra -« a.
                                                  — a.
                                                        03
                                                   i  O- OJ

                                                     -n _j 1
                                                                 X
                                                                 3.
                                        CO

                                        uJ Z Z

                                           £ S.
                       I  I
                     > CO CO _i

                      Z Z Z
                     I — « —t
                      —I >- "
                      O. 3 CO



                      X X _l
                                                                       U  I
                                                                       2 CO
                                                                       —  X
                                                                       «J  CO
                                        = X X
                                        a co co

                                        cs >- >-
                                        3 X X
                                        X « <
                                        i. Z 2
 jj ;£  <
 T  -i  x
 M  Z  —
 _l It  to

. OuJ  —
> *-< ^-  2

 3 a4  3
        _!
 •J CO  3
 303.
 3: •—
 X CO  J«
                      LJ uj U  T


                      3 X     X
                      Z U CO  3
                       I  I O  u.
                      CO CO >—  Z
                      UJ t^J CO UJ
                      U- U. CJ CJ
                      U. U. X X
                      ix. uj CO (O
O 0.
3 CO

3 4
X X
3. —
UJ  >
X CO
                                                                                          X
                                                                                          Mt
                                                                                       X - to •
                                                  to :: •
                                                     r
                                                                                                 I
                                                                                                CO
                                                                       x
                                                                     ^3.

                                                                     uj to
                                                                     X >-i
                                                                     3. -4J
                                                                           XXX


                                                                     uJ Z  I   t  I
                                                                       —i  CO  CO CO

                                                                     'J    Z  Z 2
                                                                            a.

                                                                            co        -T
                                                                            —        UJ
                                                                            uJ        X
                                                                                      a.

                                                                            •j        to                x

                                                                            —        uJ                «

                                                                                                        CO
                                                                                                                                      J


                                                                                                                                      3
                                                                                                  X

                                                                                                  <
                                                                                                   I
                                                                                                X
                                                                                       XX    —
                                                                              3  <
                                                                              X  I
                                                                              a.  oj
                                   X  u.
                                   CO  UJ
                                         Ci X
                                         z r
                                         X CO
                                         *- CO
                                         Z t
 CO
 3, —

• I X
 •- 35
. uJ X
3

X

<
                                                       •J  '
                                                 — 35 X
                                                 < -. UJ
                          I — ^ -* _) Z .
                z  z  .
                •^  t—  I
                x  »•!  :
                3  x  •
      — uJ  3.  3 3
      CO O     _) _l
      CO     <  _l _)
      uJ to  —  3 3
      35 uj  x  a. a.
   a to •-•  uj


TC. •— >- f-  X  XXZ
-"Z'J-  Z  «— uJ
•-    I to  3  X X J
X _1 tj     Z  J U <
3 4 uJ >—  I  I  I  Z
3.3*— ZtOCO354
i 3    ^-  »-  — t- Z

35 X    -J  uJ  UJ uj >-
   *-» 35 3  u.  U. u_ >—
                                                                                     CO
                                                                            CO       UJ
                                                                            !J> — *-  Z


                                                                            X 'Jj UJ  _l
                                                                 n a
                                                            I UJ 3 3
                                  t>

                                  r r
                                                                             x  o
                                                                             —  3
                                       z  x
                                       3  I
                                                             P ij r- CO  j«           4
                                                              -• z        z  z  r  3
                                                             'ZuJCO'J  —  —>—  3
                                                             I I — to  X  _l  _l  _l
CO X  X 3  uJ  X
^ 3 3 a  S  — X

~ z  z oe  _>  i  «t

uJ       CO  3  U -~
3 uj uJ a  u-  Z —
— U U t-  Z  4 «
3 X  X CO  UJ  X a.
c; to co        3
         to  JJ  CO ad
ca >- >- u)  <_>  co
3 x  x a:  x  « >—
X 4 4 CO  CO     X
X Z Z        >- 3
   3 3 uJ  uJ  >- 3.
UJ "» —• _I  _1  "-I 35

4 4 4 E  I  < 4

CO CO tO £  T  3 •—
                                                                                                                                                  X  I
                                                                                                                                                  i- CO
                                                                   X X 4 4     t
                                                                   to —  i  i    to
                                                                      4 35 tO    35

                                                                   3 to tj U    to

                                                                   »- UJ u. U.    4
                                                                   4 — u. u.
                                                                   •— 35 uj uj 'J CO
                                                                   X >•       Z CO
                                                                   3 to »• >e a: u,
                                                                   3.          •— X
                                                                   CO a« 35 CO Z iT
                                                                                                             X U
                                                                                                             3? 3
                                                                                                             S X
                                                                                                                3.
 r  r •_) u  4  *
to i— 3 3  3
>— J. 2 X  3  CJ
'-) S 0. X     Z
UJ           XX
                                                            Z 4  u- 2 4



                                                            X >-
                                                            •- 35

                                                            X 3
                                                                                 -1 -« _J _1 — 2

                                                                                 -j 5 '3 u S x
                                                                                 r r uj uj 4 —
                                     MX^'^'VJ-yM—  — X'OM — X — — —  —  — — — AJ-VJAJ —  —  —-U-XJ^-
                                     «<4«-*o — 'U'^  ^
                                     O ^ Z»O ^O OOO-u*-^»-^-*^***^u^«  — f\J'VJ-\J'\j'\j-v|-v'\j'\j'V-^«ov^'*lrf>^«^«n-o-«3 ^3^  ^I
                                     00000000000000000000000000000000300000000-^00
                                                                                                                                                OC13

-------
       J. Z
z     5 z
>      O .i.

uJ      ?~

CO
aJ      >-
^      a.
<
o
cs
0
-u
f— *—

3
z
u at


o
o
z
£ u.
X
I
z
a.









UJ
UJ

i r
Jt
X
•*>
C
0-
0

o
-

o
o
o
c

in
o
z
il
LJ
_J
o>
UJ
CO
I
a.

z

~
0
2:
f
•V

o
*
CC
in
0
c
-
o
or
.n
^
o


O O O O O O O O O O O O OOOOCOOOOOOC O O O
**S:sS52S?5*fSc?S=oa?????S?SS
oooooooooooooooooc-oooocoooo
-si -a r\, - m ^i-f~o
»Cf'Cr:r-OOOOOOOOOO
O O {^ P*» O ^ «•» O O •* En **• f*~ O O "1 O "* O 9 O O v* o 0 O O
?^^-S?S'SS*^~»S-=?oe>§S2:3;SSclc?
J\ •« •* f* ~+ ^ ^ ^ *o f^ »"* ^>
•M —
=0000 o oo o o
ru— ««n-*fv -* ^»»* ^« (%i
cocoooccooooooooo oocc o
•onj*o-(virisir«» — »^ o- a a- * -x. « m^ina ro
>- a:> u zzatz
u. uujziaru — - .u iiti
X -J ^ *^ CO •"» Z 31 CO- CO CO (O
CZ**U ZI*-< U 223:2
— ^ J 2 J*-ST5_J ft M ^2 *--j«a. —< c «-> j«-_»
xco 2 *•• • tu a. uj 3; £i *^ a. *D 2 x
a.uj^^ocoo a.K coco «jC
rf -* 2uJ CO — < 2 >JJ LUUJ 2»--z — 3:3:02:20; x »jjjojoo>-*.xx3:a,i
Wjj5j--J«X 1 5ouIz<-*T uJuJzIjjJiZ 1 — 2 1
ScoSa^G^i^^SSiLrcooliSo^iSil
-zzu-a-zos i j < « < « i- z z -4- z u -OrNlZ ICO Z
, «^,,n ,,.,» ,.-*,n. ...«**., ..^.
===c=o==co=o=ooo==oo====oc=



OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

l»
o
o
o
a
o
r\j
o
g
0
a

I
to
|
*
i
u

u
_l
.
-
=>

«
»

«
•M
O
O
o
*
o
ru
o
°,

ru

1
CO
£
«
z


u
_1
r
C!
°
£
«
O

u
ru
o
0
o
CO
e
ru
o
£
K\
o
ru

<
I
co
a3
aJ
1


U
_)
«



<
O

u
o
o
c
c
Kl
O
ru
o
g
a
c
^

<
I
CO
.J

I
5
CO
u
_l
-



<
0



UJ ll
« ^
CO 2
— 3
£.,

co a:
z jj
•c x
C1 Cr
o o
a: a:
•u x
« «
o o
in in
f o-
i
oil
o o
0 O
0 O
£ X.
o o
ru "u
o o
o o
in in


i -1
: in a:
' —  JO
) Z
: J Z
c o ^
t — d
»; £
< X
CO Z
— a:
a «
a.
ff3 _|
< i
*— C1
2
4 CO
*O C

0 O
.. ~4
<
•u -u

0 O

-------
z
uJ
      •- li
      .L: Z
      'J — i
S        a:
2    S
o    z  <
CE    O  i-
Z    CO Z
a.    O-
CO
-•_•    V
95

O
        • OD  a*  oct-O'Ajf'-oiDinr'ieo  .o  oJ2'O'\ip»-*--^*»-irt«^'OOf'i'v®4r»»««"ic> ^  o  *M o o ec **»
         jiM^j^i"'! — r*iffi*?O'ZT&3&-*fist&--~ o
          ,.....  .,,,,,,.,.,,,..
         !\J*Fl")''\ir.C'«»-N-»-XtCC>O>-i — — rV3
                                        ''i't*o9999i CT 3
                                        ^^^r^Kl*^'^*ti*>




oooooooooooooooocooooooooooooooooooooooooco

oo'»>»u-i.oo-O'»«-«f\i'Air>f--i;3>c>c>oo-«-«»s33=ta3int>;>c>c>»c5oo-«-"-«»-rK^t*ii**'*»>*i  «r co «i K* «o "\ •*> M> •*>•*> ^ sj-  3-3 :y 31 3 sr
^i|Ornrnr^pn^^p^^^'^^^^'^Kli^«o>''»*O"'>"'»**»*>'*IF*>>*>K>**>''O-'>*'>^>''***>K>r*}^K>"^f*>«*j





oooocoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

cG£wt
CO CO
_l _l
X X

O i-)

X X


z z
UJ UJ
I I
II
a a.
         X
         a.
   UJ
   a:
   Q.    ^«
         a.
   CO    oJ
   •H    a:
   jj    a.

   _1    CO

   z    uj
         -J
         i_!
         2
                                     X X
                                     O Z)
                                     Z 2
                                           LJ i-<
                                           x ^
                                     ac a:
                                     < <
     _l    Z
     >    «

     c    to
        — 05
     CO Z  uJ
     UJ UJ CO
     « z  to
 •—  ;3 uJ <
 Z  uJ O    I-
 uJ  •- X  >- Z


 1_-  C Z  Z uJ

> o        G <
i u-  •— uj  uj Z
      u. u.
      ** l»«
      X I
      jj uj
a: n: > >

< « UJ UJ
 I   I  U U
CO CO Z Z
*— f- < «
z z « —i
«-<_)_»
_)•- a. a.
a. r> z s
                                                                                       Q.
                                                                                          _J
                                                                                       CO U
                                                                                    I
                                                                                    CO
                                                   UJ

                                                   o,
                                                      I
                                                   CO I
                                                   « I
                                                   uJ I

                                                   _J I
                                                   U '
                                                   Z i
                                                                         l SJ U     ••
                                     z >

                                     —s
                                     (O
                                     jj tO
                                     z -j
                                                         t
                                                        to    _j
                                                        CO    >
                                                        OJ    UJ
                                                        CO    O
                                                        CO
                                                                I
                                                               CO
                                                               LJ
                                                               er
                                                               co
                                          : X to '
                                           to
2 or
o o
                                           < w
                                           z
                 i  CO  at
            UJ  _l        >- (
            <_;  O  >-  O5 •— i
            x  a.  or  o -«
            to     <  >- _j
                oi  Z  O5 «
                               a: x !_> u  i
                               J >JJ O 3 CO
                                I  — o 2 uj
                               Z —i O CJ CO
                               31 sc a: 05
                               z u a. x uj
                                I   I  UJ UJ iJ
                               co to a: z c
                               >- •- a. o. cr
                               u u       a

                   : u- u. x  x  «  i
                    aj UJ CO  to  —  I
                                 X
                                     05
                                     (_> a
                                     Ql O
                                     -i
                                           « T
                                           — ~
                                           CO £
_J :£ «« 09  S


^> UJ « «-l  X


Z uj CO UJ <
                                                                 uj •— »— _j  _j co  *— _j jj ra
                            Z uj uj O O Z
                            < r r z z —
 <    CO
       uJ
 to    >-<
 co    a
 UJ    u.
 X X «-
 ;i — «

i X  I t-
I CL •- 05
'    X

    a. -z.
i Ci Q. i-
 Z 3 3
 X CO _)

 z _ja
 5 «

 co —
 "* Z \5
 Z I X
 UJ U uJ
 X
                                  -*       z
                                  to       ~
                                  to       •"
                                  UJ       •-
                                  CO       «
                                  CO    IS I—
                                  <    z a:
                                     >- a: c
                                  j- z — a.
                                  U jj Z CO
                                  _1 Z O Z
                                  z uj z «
                                  X ts    a:
                                     ST 2 —
                                  «e       u
                                     >• a: ^
                                  CO t- w U.
                                  O M « u.
                                  •- _i    UJ
                                  CO « i-
                                     3 z r
                                  05 3 jj "—
                                  CO    — • _l
                                  «— ar z
      o

      CO

x    x

< — z
 I  <:
uJ  I  —
•o ^ r
Z i- X
«5  « CO
X U. Z
3
03 Wl .t
CO
                                                                                                                                           a.

                                                                                                                                           ec
                                               x a: u
                                                   •- z
                                               _j < <
                                               :> I  —
                                               a- CO _J
                                               a « a.
                                                                                       CO U
                                                                                       Z UJ
                                                                                       OJ U-
                                                                                                z
                                                                                                UJ
                                                                                                      co to ~ c.
                                                                                                                                           UJ
                                                                                                                                           ac
                                  >    X

                                  UJ    «X
                                  o     I
                                  z    to

                                  >-i    Z
                                  _J    •-
                                  a.
                                  s.
                      3.

                      «

            -  z     x
         CO O  O     uJ
                                                                          co oe —
                                                                                z
                                                                          o* CO jj

                                                                          CO CO UJ
                                                                          3 to 'J

                                                                          r o z ,
                                                                          •- r; «
                                                                          uJ X Z
                                                                          z a.
                                                                                                U Z    Uv •-
                                                                                                X uJ CO X U

                                                                                                Z uj T B ri
                                                                                                 : (J •" x c
                                                                                                uj z _l O. X
                                                                                                   O jj    3.

                                                                                                U Z —    X
                                                                                                X uJ 3 IB Q.
                                                                                                CO    ti Z
                                                                                    I  Z CO F— t— uj UJ <
                                                                             •-  a.  x
                                                                             «i  CO  —
                                                                             _(Z  u
                                                                             <  «  X
                                                                             3  x  r
                                                                             2  -  u
         z « —(

         X — <

         "^5-3

         Z O X
< to rr  s K
z    a.
O u»     CO uJ
~* —I uJ  O _l
                J  X X

                5  < i
                S   I  Z
                X  •- 3
                a.  x z
                uj  O I
                x  a. co
                a.  OL •-

                uJ  to uJ
                (J     a.
                X  _lu.
                to  < u.
Z X        X
< to        M
»-           <
3 Z        I
_! O        CO
_i -«        z
O •-        UJ
a. <        •—
   —    ar  to
< x    —  >•
•-« O    «  to
XXXI

— Z  < jj
M <  I to  to
X X  uJ CO  O
U —  LJ UJ  O
 I  I  Z ^J  X
05 to  < 5  F-
>- »-  or x  uj


u. u-  05 ™i  ^
u. u.  « <  Z
oj uj    >^  M
       >- X  X
r i  •- •-  c
>— i-  M 05  t-
                                                                 < t? ^ uJ "C
                                                                 •— ~ — X 3
                                                                 co z co i- ? :
                                                                                                            '  UJ JJ 3 ^ S
                                                                                                              I I 3 ~ Z


                                     o =  = o  o
                                                         '  O O O C5 :
                                     xxrrrirrxxixii
                                          lO'XJ —  ^-C1  ^•*>«*"i—••*(
                                     LT J)^.»C>O-»M"1S;
                                     X s>sccc:c?-Cf'3-:?>9>
                                     oooooooooo

-------
a*    -  <
Z       Z
2    T
      "C X
      3-
       0
.fv  5  i
 o_o  i
         <
                       — 3
                       I X
                                                —• C" o
                                  r- o ji ;n o »i      I
                                  -^ K    IO
                                  T> —    —
                                  aJ U    U
                                  2 jJ    jj
                                  •-> DC
                                                   z z
                                  od 10 tO tO I  I
                                     to to to *-  ;
                          ^tototo—'EX  ^

                                          I U  U

                                            >  o
                          «OOO3o-U-u.
                          - O O = 5. Z 2  2
                          cr>a i a: a. uJ uj  uj
                             a. a. a. t5


                          i«<<_io:xa
                          coy—••vj^tnffito



                          "-_J2_1T— «>-i
                          xr'2~us»'2


-------

|
a:
cr
U-



I AGENCY
0 f-
1- Z
«J t- 3
Ul CO
t- Ul Z
O 3 O
CC O •—
cc »
—1 U
« 1- Ul
•c c:
tl O >-
x 3 tn
Z CO
O t-
cr co 09
•-> X UJ
>• O 3
z e
CO CC
CO C*
UI — f-
>- 111
< >- o
•- u. o
CO 3
£
O
Ul
••*
z
3
I I
CC
~
o
o
a: o- w
u r^
Ul O-
*•* O »•* 1—
U >^ 1 O
<_> CD -x
b.
0-
Ul
U.
0
0
1- •—
CO
Ul «
o
O Ul
— CD cr t-
39 O- O
« — h- (-
ui v
(9 Ul
CC
a.
Ul
h-
U.
C
o
Ul *••'
X
••*
»~
CO
9- Ul
•*• — Z 1-
CC Ul
ec «-
Z> U.
u
t—
u.
a.
UJ
u.
Ul
*-
fr-H
^~
3
0
Ul
c
o
u
0
w*
9
ru
i
9
ru
i
o
5
o-
o
in
o
in
ru
CD
tn
Kl
O
ILTH EFFECTS-TRANSPORTATION SRCS-AIR
\DOUARTERS 49
Ul Ul
•r. r
in o
0 I
0 O
CD 0
•- O
9 0
— 0*
9 0
IM 0-
1 1
9 0
ru o
1 1
o o
••> o
9 O
ru co
r- o
o o
tn KI
*> o
^ 9
0 O
tn o
ru o
CD CO
in <-
»*t CD
O 0
rAL 49
kLTH EFFECTS-CRITERIA POLLUTANTS-AIR
iDQUARTERS 43
O Ul Ul
H- XX
3 O O
O — X
o o
0 O
o kt
o tr
V- CD
o tn
O- 9
o tn
• •**
O O
o tn
0 O
CO C^
O «f
o -c
O f»»
9 ru
Kl Kl
e o
o in
CO **!
— 1 C
CD ru
0 CO
rAL 43
kLTH EFFECTS-NON-CRITERIA PLTNTS-AIR
iDQUARTERS 97
O Ul Ul
t- XX
3 in c
0 — X
0 •«
o in
tn  e
•« -e
in o
ru »
9 41
- «M
tn e
rAL i«
NSPORT I FATE-AIR
^QUARTERS 44
o cc ui
»- »- X
3 ino
c rux


tn
i
tn
o o
e o
— o
o tn
-• 9
tn ru
o o
9 O
9 ru
o o
e o
— o
o tn
-» 9
ru o
o in
fAL 44
>USTRIAL PROCESSES-AIR
DQUARTER8 23
O Z Ul
t- »* X
3 CD O
O rux


in
K)
tn
o
o
o
in
9
nj
o
o
ru
o
e
o
tn
9
e
tn
rw
o
3
O





ru ru
in tn
CO CC
•« 4)
O 0
-C 0
ru ru
W Kl
tn tn
CD CD
I-" I-"
O O
(CTRZTN t MSRMT MTHOS OVLPMT-AIR
kDQUARTERS 63
AL 63
x ui o
UI >-
0 O 3
r* X O
0
0
0
§
in
ru
in
o
o
tn
•49
9
ru
o
ru
o
e
tn
9
-
tn
iroRiNG METHODS t SYSTEMS-AIR
OOUARTERS IP
o ui
r x
irv o
o ru
o -t>
o tn
§ |
tn o
ru ru
I
tn o
i
e co
O 9
tn o
•fi ru
9 Kl
ru 9
0 0
— 9
ru in
0 0
o —
tn -c
r- tn
9 K1
v* 9
in o
AL 18
HNICAL SUPPORT-AIR
OOUARTERS 46
O Ul Ul
H- r- X
3 0 O
C 9 X
  I
 o-
 o
oc:?

-------






^
X
or
u.
















>•
^
U)
ts

z
o •-
»-l l-l
•- 2
UJ CO
O 3 O
 cc
Z ID
o »-
E (DCO
•-I X UJ
> o ^
z o
UJ O UJ
CO Or
CO O-
^* UJ
« >-e
t- U. O
E.
O
Ul
^
Z






























>-
^>
~
5
o
cr
OC1S <


*~h
o
0
o
•—

o£**
~o -»-
»J X. | O
*""* O « X.
z c- bj
u.

u.
O-
X.
Ul
u-

^%
o
o
o
*- *-*
•5
Ul «

O ttJ
*•* a> tr *-
Q2 ^ O
Ul "v
c i—
O U.
IT
»-
a.
X.
Ul
u.

.^s
o
o
H-
£
**
*—
«>
O* UJ
*-vr» H-
«••* »* Z ^-
UJ X.
CC Ul
cc »-

*-
u>
CL

UJ
u.




















'












UJ
f-
*-
^
o
UJ
o
o
l_l
ru r*
c •
•^ -C
in 9
K* •*
1 »
CD

0 9
re f»
— 1
1
0 9
ru HI
•• i
•

co o o m
9 — — ru
o o o «*
ru O- O- 9
tn 99 *
r»



^ ^ ^ m
m « o in
9 99 O
W^


o o o o*
9 99 Kl
P»l 99 9
9


O O O CO
•I ~ ^ Ml
^} o O -4}
in » o- f-
rt 99 ^>
in




O 0- O- O-
9" •a •f co*
m 99 c


o o o K>
« 99 r-
9 99 9
9





















cr
^*
<
i
UJ

z
«
tr
=> 09
09 a:
CO UJ
< t—
cr
_ji >H a _i •-

O 3 UJ O
*- O 1. *~ Z
or
o a x o o-

o
•
o
0
0
*
in

*•
«v






K)
m
»»
°"
o
m



9
ni
9



O
_
nt
••


•^
m
r-
o-
m
*^




m
0-
K>


O
„
ru
••
^,
o.
Ul
t£
O.

CO
•^
UJ

_l
u
»•*
«^
en
CO
UJ
m
CO
«

>
cs
_J
z
X

Ul
t—

ft CO
tr
en ui
o >—
t- or
CO (3
co o
X Ul
ui x
0 X
ru
o
•
o
o
o
«
£

•^
ru






M
in
p^
»
o



9
ru
9



O
—
ru
•"


M
in
r-
O-
in





m
o-
M


0
_
ru
~*



































_,
<•
o
H-
o









in
«•*






o
0
9
m
ni



«
j>
m



o
ru
9



O
O
9
in
ni





CO
9
m


o
CM
9

or
a.

CO
•^
UI

_l
u
z
M
V*

>
UJ
o

CO
1*1
M
C9
UJ

•e
or
^—
CO

^
z
^>
Zi CO
_i or
O UJ
tx. *—
Or
o a
or o
Z Ul
UJ X
— X
ru








m
J?






o
o
9
m
ru



••>
^
m



o
ru
9



O
O
9
m
ru





CO
9
in


o
ru
9




































_,
<
o
1—
O

o
•
0
o
in



'


^
_
i


o
_
w«
*•
m



m
m
••



o
^.
o-



0
_
9
m





—
m
"


o
K>
fr

10
14
i«l

_I
JJ
z
»4
«^

_l
>
o

to
cs
UJ
or

•B

CO
UJ
z
*M
•
UJ
o
i^
3
cs co
or
cs uj
o ^~
a. tr
UJ (3
1— O
»- UJ
« X
v^ X
ru
o
•
0
o
in



*


o
„
1


o
„
v«
*•
in



in
in
••



o
,»
o-



o
».
9
tn





•"
in
••


o
K>
O*




































_J
<
Q
fr~
O









0- C-
ru ru






r- I-
0- 0-

m m



0 0
ru ru
fO fl
-" —


r» r-
O* o-

9 9
«M *•




03 CO
9 9
m in


0 o -c m
»- r- ru




— . M to
49-0 ru
ru ru co



o o f»
O- O- 9
00 9
— — *•»


00 9
m in —
-0*0 o
99 CO





ru ni -•
m KI 9
Kl K\ -C


m in <
f- r~ in
xx ru
•~ •• **

u.
^4
or
UJ
>

U.'
u
z
«t
"-1
^J
0.
x
o
u

z
o
»4
^ ^^
u z
Z) Ul
O X
o uj
or cs
o. •<
ui z
or <
a. x
CD
ui or *-
U UJ »-
tr »- »-
-
d


-------





<

z
tr
o
u.
















>-
u
z
UJ
u
<
z
O 1—
•1 ••*
>- z
u »- 3
UJ CO
t- Ul Z
o z> o
or c M
CL tL) tO
or — '
_J U
•« 1- Ui
^- UJ O
z u
UJ O >•
Z => CO
Z 1C
o *-
or IE co
«-" Z UJ
> O 3
Z C
UJ O UJ
CD or
CO 0-
Ul — 1—
*• UJ
< >- C9
K- U. O
CO 3
CC
o
Uf
fr~
z






























>•
*-
*•»
_J
<
Z)
o
CC
*_»
<



o
o


CC (?> M
or-
UJ O
*"* O *•* H-
0 ^ « O
*^ CC O ^
CJ CO "*.
Z O UJ
»-+ — >—
u.
H-
u,
CL
X.
UJ
fr-
it.


o
o
fr- *—
CO
UJ «
ZD
o
O ul
*^ CO CC *—
ID O* O
Ul N»-
0 UJ
o *-
^u.
CC
fr-
u.
CL
X.
UJ
h-
u.



o
o
UJ ^
^
•« •»
z:
•—i
*-
co
O UJ
*-. r*s »—
< C^ f— O
UJ "V
CC Ul
CC «—
r> u.
u

>-
u.
p
V
IcU
UL

































UJ
-1
>-
*^
^
o
UJ
o
o
u







9
w-





cr
o
tu
o
fu




?T
9
to




o
•
*»1
9





o-
O
r\j
e
IM





o
K*
in





e
•
*i
9








CC
*•«
<
1
CO
CO
Ul
CO
CO
«c

CO
CO
UJ
CC
u
o
Ct
CL

•0

13
Z CO
CC CC
t- UJ
z *-
z: cc

o o
z o
Ul«
or uj
*— ^

m o
m x
ru
<
• •
ru ru
ru ru





9 99
-* — • -*





O CD CD
O 99
ru 99
o mm
ru ru ru




9 99
9 O O
in o o
^* *•



o o o
• • •
m o- o-
9 CD CD





o* «n in
o ru ru
ru ru ru
o ru ru
ru ru ru





o e> o
m e- o-
IP O- O-





o e> o
• • • •
m o- o-
9 «0 CO



















cs
•z.
or
*—
z
0
z

_J
•<
o
o

or
•i
<

»- «5
Z Z
_l Ul O _l
< *^ M <
*— CO CS *—
O Z IU O
»- < or »-

3 in «- =>
o m or o
ru
<
• •
O 0
O 0
0 O
» »
m in


e- o-
0- 0-
9 9




O O
o o
o e
o o
o o
o- o-



m in
ru N
9 9













o o
0 0
0 O
o o
tn in
f- i-




•* *
ru ru
o- e-










tn
o
—
«o
u
z
o
<

_J
u
o
_>

•e

UJ
i—
•<
^»
CO

o
t—

»—
or
o
o.
0.
z>
CO

_l
«I
»- «o
u z
Z O _l
z ts >-
M UJ O
u. or •-

in >- r>
9 or o
ru
^














o o
o o
o o
o o
m m
ru ru



















0 0
e o
O 0
o o
m IT
ru ru
















_J
or
»—
u
X
o

X.
UJ
i.
u
o
^—
o
X
O.

•e

X
o
z
o
z

CO
or
<
u

cs
z
_l
CL

or
0 «0
u. z
O _l
1- CS t-
or u> o
o or •-

e. «- r>
inor o
ru
<
•
*
«Ti
rw

«^
m

o
ru
r-
ru
o-


CD
^
•a

r-
co



»<
CD
h-
ru
^
^^

m
• •
i»-
r^
e-




CD
m
0
o-
m
in
••



~
o
o
ru
»
*«


v*
•
e
•c
o-



































_i
<
»-
o
t—
•z
tr.
a.
o.
«
• •
m »*
9 in
in




mm
9 m
ru
o m
m m
ru

o e-
<>• c-
•c o-
inm
mo-
v«



m o
9 9
o ru
— 9



0 -C
• •
o ru
o- t*
m




f- O
in CD
ru 9
m o
mo-
««




co r»
• *
o- o
o- o
9




om
• •
r- O-
CD «
m















*-
z
Ul
z
UJ
u
cr
o
u.
z
UJ

Ul
u
or
CO CC
or
>- UJ
K t-
« or
z •<  z
>-i3 O
>^ o ^^
< < IS
1— UJ UJ
co x or

in o «-
o x a
m
^
m 9 ru
o» ru c
in CD ru
*
ru


CD mm
f^ o r-
ru -o I
m m o
-c CD r-
ru 9

o- mo
CD « O
-o o o
— m CD
m co
m



m o o
0) 9 O-
ru r» ru
in —



•o in o
• • •
ru l>- O>
CD 9 ru
9 —




rw r* m
m — • h-
r> CD o-
in 9m
9 m
ru




in * m
O 9 •*>
o — m
m -«




m ru o
• • • •
« c*- ru
in o- ru
9



















t-
Z
Ul
z
Ul
u
or
o
u.
z
UJ
CO
ui or
OU)
or »-
coor
«t CO
Ul 3 Z
_j _ia o
^ M O ^^
>- CD < tS
o o ui ui
i- z x or

3 o a t-
o —X or
m
^
p*.
ru
o
*
m


o
m
m
m
in
m

m
*
o
«^
o>




O"
m
o
ru



in
•
*
r*.
v«




o
O-
r-
o
•a





o-
o
in
v«




ru
•
•^
ru
"





































_j
^
t—
o
»-

r>
o

•
ru
ru
«
^
m


CD
o
CD
4>
JT
CD

ru
in
»-
ru
9
m



ru
ru
m
r-



_
•
0-
in
•e




r~
ru
m
*
o
m




9
•
in
<«




in
•
»-
f-
n



































_i
<
•—
o
*—
z
or
OL
O-
<
• f-
in i
ru t*
m •«
•• i
m o-
in o

9
o-
9
9
f-
CD

in
o-
9
CD
^~
0*
ru


CD
in
•*•
in
Ch
ru

m
•
o
CD
O
*
ru


m
9
ru
m
9
9
ru



9
•
-C
•0
m
»
ru


o-
•
ru
o-
o-
^



































_l
•<
1 oc:s

<

o
UJ
^-

-------




(C

X
cr
o
t^
















CJ
z
Ul
43
<
Z
D t-
>-• ••*
1- 2
(J •- 3
ui n
*- UJ 2
O 3 0
cc o *•
n. u> co
CC i"
J U
4 t— UJ
t- ui o
2 U
ui o >•
2L 3 1C
Z CC
o »•
cr ID co
t-t s: uj
> O 3
2 O
Ul 0 Ul
CD Cc
m o-
Ul — I-
»— U)
« >- e>
f-U. O
CO 3
CD
O
Ul
t—
»«4
2












OOL


^* «
« => *
« 0 <
« 0 «
« »- *
« «
« ec o- •» «
* or- «
« Ul tf «
* ~o. — *
« O x. 1 t- «
« wx cc O U. *
< l_> to 0- «
« z o> o «
« I-H «•* *
: :
« *
* «
i •-«
: t:
: :
« «
— «
: «
« «
« •- «
« o «
« » «
« »- 0 «
« «0 " «
« Ul <
~ — 5 Mft «
4t — ' " *
« 0 «
« « O Ul *
« u co a «
« <-* o- *
* •" i— *
« ui»- *
« ISU. «
« o a «
« 3 0 «
« cc *
: :
* «
« t- *
* U- *
« 0. «
« *
« «
* *
_ 4r
« ^
* *
* «
+ ..-. «
« o «
« o «
* 0 «
« uc- *
« t- «
* ?* *
« X *
* *» *
« •- «
« CO «
« o- ui *
* -.»- r- «
« CD Cf t- U. «
« v — z a. «
« ui o *
« cc «
* cc. *
« 3 «
« 
9 9
ni ru
•^ f^.


o o
• •
f^ f*


o o
-C -4>
9 9



O 0
• f
r\ IT
cu m
CO CO
in in


o o
ft pt



o e
o-" P-
9 9




»- 1-
n 
u
cc
m
e o
0* «
»^ 9 9
H-
<


cc
o
OL
eo
z
«r
cc
t*
«
CO
H-
0 «0
UICC
U. Ul
u. •-
iucr
<
X 3
l-O J
_»o «
* * ^
UJ LiJ O
xx *-
mo 3
ox o
*"
^
0 0 '
• •
0 O
0 0
eT cr









0 0
• ' •
KV It



O O
• •
0 0
0 0
CD «0
* «
o e


0 0
• »
9 9



O O
r- I-
f» »O



0 0
• •
0 0
0 0
CD a>



e o
9 9



0 0
• * •
9 9
<\i m



0 0
9 9
K» f**
CC OJ 
er »•
CC CD









o o
o o



0 0
• •
in in
o o
f»» K»
o- cr
•^ ^«

o o
0 0
— •*


0 0

t^ fl
w- •"



o o
• •
m m
m m
»« «
o o



0 0

«rt •-


0 0
- • * •
9 9
ft) 
|M>
z
»-
• e> ^
j ^ v
a. • •
r» r»
««
• •
v\ in
-c -c
 m
/W rti



0 0
• •
M ni



o o
» • ' •
en in



o o
• V
O O
O 0
in in


cc
*4
<
1
co c e
^ • •
Uft| CU
Ul fl t*>
u.
U-
Ul

«e
•0
Ul
n
1?0 ECOLOGICAL PROCE8
HQ HEADQUARTERS
OU TOTAL
<



















o o
• •
0 0
— •«
0 0
« ^
•M -*•

**

0 0
• •
* -c



0 0
9 9
9 9



O O
• •
0 0
0 0
*" **


0 0
* -0



0 0
• • •
9 9
9 9



0 0
• •
O O
0 0
m ir

•M V*

e c
» •
0 CC
Kl Kl





CC
*^
<
125 TRANSPORT * FATE-
HO HEADQUARTERS
DU TOTAL
«



















o o
• •
0 0
0 0
m m
9 9



0 0
• •
m m



0 0
• •
0 0
ni >v



o o
a •
0 0
0 0
m in
9 9



0 0
• •
l/> *n



0 0
• • * •
o o
nj ni



o o
• •
c? o
0 *
c e
m in


0 0
r- t-
rvi ~

cc


<
i
CO
Ul
m
U28 INDUSTRIAL PROCE!
HQ HEADQUARTERS
DU TOTAL



















•^ t^>
F^ »^
• •>
rw m
to to
in in
e CD



0 0
• •
TO IO




0 0
• •
•o to
« -0



r* r—
• •
«\i «i
to to
in tn
^ *
CO «



0 0
• •
to to



0 0
* • ' •
to to
« •*>



0 0
• •
o o
o e
0 C
* •*
IP m
cc
*^
<;
1
1- C 0
a cc co
_jm i*
>
o

ia
O
•y
H-
I
i_
U30 CHRCTRZTN » MSRM'
HQ HEAOQUARTERS
OU TOTAL


• «
o o
0 0
*+ •*
1 1














o o
• •
o o
•n in
« «
9 9



0 0
• •
tu ni




o o
• •
ru no


o o

o o
in in
r- i~
» »
9 9



0 O
• •
fU W



0 0
• • • •
*+ ^t
fVI ft!



o o
» •
in m
in in
tfl Kl


CC
f^
< 0 0
to * -c
X
Ul
t*
0)


•0

^
to
o
A135 MONITORING METHO
HQ HEADQUARTERS
OU TOTAL


•
-c
in
tn
•









o
9
1


CO
•
9
C
w
»
t»i



o
•
«




o
•
OT


O

*
in
t»i



o
• •




o
• •
-c


.

o
•
o
o
cr



i*'
•
*
in




a
<
i
t-
AlflO TECHNICAL SUPPOR
HQ HEAOQUARTERS



-------
1
a.
X
CC
b.



U
z
UI
e
2
O *-
•-• 1-1
»- Z
UI CO
•- bJ Z
one
a. ui co
CC «->
f- UI O
(Z C9
tj O >-
z = eo
Z CD
O 1-
a cc to
>• 0 =>
tu o ui
CD CC
bJ — t-
t- UJ
»- b. 0
CO 15
Sj
UI
z


I-I
<
3
O
CC
o
o
CC P- •»
ui o
^ Q —
O -N. • t-
uco a.
2 o- o
u.
tv
o
o
t— o
CO -^
UI
c
•-% o bJ
U CO CC
-" O
o u
S 0
CD
u_
a
o
o
o
t—
«C M
a:
09
ID l> 1— It
U) C
CC
CC
o
K-
fck.
D.
O
O
CD ^r — '
•< o- *- *w
-c
CL
_J
H-
o
UJ
c
o
0
Al
I
O
1
0 0
9 —
o o
l\l .>
f^  a
o o
* 0
tn o-
Kl a
0 0
-o ru
c o
•c a
KI a
0 0
0 CC
o a
c- a
0 0
fAL 56
*LITY ASSURANCE-AIR
^DUUARTERS 38
o => ui
>- ox
3 
O
APPRN
o
o
o
o
in
o
ru
Kl
m
o
Kl
O
in
o
ru
Kl
in
o-
o
Kl
O
ru
0. 0
tr o
a —
•1C-
bJ
u
Z
!-. O
133 STOS » TECHNLGY ASSESS
IDQUARTERS 111
X UI
UI I
in o
ox
o
o
o
o
in
O 0
Kl O
tn o
»- a
o ru
Kl
o o
m o
O 0
ru a
Kl O
in o
r- a
o m
o o
Kl O-
0 0
-« ru
ru a
tr
CL
O O
O l-> «
— UI CC
a r-
o u ru
i-i
•0 > 0
rAL in
:RG I POLUTNT STRATEGIES Dl
^QUARTERS 1)2
o z ui
»- UI X
3 O O
0 — Z
ru
o
o
o
a
ru
o
o
o
 -C -0
•i tn tn
U)
o c c
*TE PROG GUIDELINES » REGS
VOQUARTERS 99
rAL 99
t- ui o
CO X t-
in o 3
— X O
o
ru
o
«
a
o
CD
o
ru
Kl
r-
o-
•c
a
o
«
0
ru
Kl
0.
UI 0
CL a
o
com
bJt-
u
2
z ru
bJ
O
(S
c*
co
co
CO
«o a
(JUI
CC *-
-13
•-. O
O UI
Z X
00
ru x
o
ru
X
a
0
CO
o
ru
o
a
V*
o
-0
o
ru
Kl
O
a
o
in
t^
o
*
ru
-1
•<
O
»-
O
>- t- CO
K! KI •
Kl Kl Kl
•C -O —
1
0
o
o o
o o
•e -e
00 — i —
in in in tn
* -0 Kl Kl
•*. r* ru ru
a a e- o-
o o o o
ru ru r- r~
o o o o
o- o- r- f-
o o a a
— — Kl Kl
o o a a
«n in — —
* -c o o
a a co co
o o o o
- - h- i-
o o oo
0-0- — —
O O Kl Kl
— ••» Kl Kt
U. O O O O
CC 0 O O O
bJ o o o o
> a a ^ *
uiin in in in
u
z
_i
Q. O O O O
)ILE SRCE PPEPRODUCTION COf
iDUUARTERS 126
rAL 126,
' QUALITY MANAGEMENT
SIGNS 299
tAL 299
Out O M UI O -,/—.-«
n •- «cc - 3!;_1
in o 3 01- 3
ru x o KI cc o
ru ru

-------






cc

£
IT
O
U.
















>.
U
z
UJ
IS
<
Z
O »-
*«* »•*
01-3
UJ CO
^* UJ Z
o rs o
a. uj co
a —
_1 0
t- uj a
z u
UJ 0 >-
Z 3 0
z m
O H-
tr CD CO
>• O ID
z o
ui a uj
CO CC
CO O
UJ — t-
t— UJ
4 ^ U
t- U. O
CO =>
X
UJ
^
z




























^>
H-
^4
-1

3
o
tr
pr-" 7 -.
\'.\J^L f




^*
C
o
o
*"•*
or O 01
o **-
U) O
O >v 1 »-
*_» CD a.
200


£
CL

O
O
»- o
CO ^^
u
=} M
O
^ 0 UJ
U co cr
*" i»-
Cf u.
O O.
Z> O
(C



u.
CL





O
o
o
l_
< **
z
»*
^
CO
O taJ
a> «> »- u.
w »• Z ft.
UJ O
cr
a
z>
u

H-
u.
CL



-^^
O
O
^j O

»••*. f*- Z)
< O H- M
w »* u
<

f—
U.
o.


















UJ
«J
K-
*-l

ZJ
o
UJ
d
o
u









o
-»





o
o
fu
o
ru




o
CO





o
K*
S3"




O
e
f\i
o
ru





o
^





0
• t
Kl
9



O
0
e
m
Kl
cr

<
t
CO
CO 0
U) •
co r*\
CO 9
<
CO
CO
UJ
cr
o
o
tr
D_

•£

U
2 CO
a: cr
H- UJ
Z ^
z cr
c<
CO Z>
o o
2 O
UJ •<
cr uj
*- X

Kl O
Kl X
ru
^
Kl
»
ru
ru
-"



o o
~* —.





o- co
o a
ni a
O Kl
fu ru




0 0
CO CO





0 C
Kl C*
a co




tr «n
o ru
ru cu
o ru
ru ru





0 0
r- f-





o e
* • •
Kl O
a co



C 0
o e
0 0
in ru
Kl •-





o e
• •
Kl 0
a CD

u
•z.
tr
H-
2
O
r

_j
<
3
o

IE
••*
<

•- CO
2 2
-I UJ 0
>- m is
o z uj
*— •<. K

3 in ^>
O Kl CC
fU
<
t*\
*
ru
«v
~



o
„





CD
a
a
Kl
ru




o
CO





o
o-
CO




m
ru
ru
ru
ru





o
^





o
• £
tr
CO



0
0
e
ru
_





o
•
0
co




















_l
h—
o
»—

^
0


o o
• f
O 0
O 0
0 O
in in
v« ~»

O 0
in m
Kl Kl




o e
o e
o o
e o
0 0
0- 0-



o o
0 0
e o
W4 v«










e o
0 0
e o
O 0
vi m
^ f^




0 0
m in
•6 ^










tn
o o o
~ 0 0
to o o
u o o
cs m in
« « -c

—i
o
o
i

••

UJ
—
^
CD

O
^

^
C
O
c.
0.
3
CO

J
^
l-l CO
U 2
20 _!
2 IS l-
i-< UJ O
u. tr »-

in t- n
a (r o
ru
^















o o
o o
e o
0 0
m in
ru ru

















e o
o e
o o
o o
in m
ru ru

















IE
*-
£•)
X
O
z
UJ
X
u
o
H-
D
X
CL

•e
x
o
2
o
z

1C
cc
^
o

(S
2
_j
o.

ir
O CO
U. 2
0 _l
CO *^ <
1- O t-
ct uj c
a a: >-

o t- r>
in tr o
ru
^
0
«
•0
m
ru
J^
Kl

O
a
a

0
•c

CO
^
-e>
••
r-
CD
«M


O
^
WM
ru



e
o
cc
o-



CO
in
e
tr-
in
in
W4



O
f?
*
v«



O
- •
a
«
»


o
in
o
o
^
o
V4



e
•
«
ru
e>

















i
^
H-
o
H-

z
o:
Q.
CL
<

Kt ^
v o
Kl •••*
am
in



o
_


o
a

0 »
0- C-
« o-
inm
in t^
«M



o o
o ru
•• ru




0 O
om
o o-
Kl



r- o
in co
ru a
in o
in e?
•«




0 0
o- ru
ru




e o
• *• •
o ->
c- co
Kl


0 0
ruco
o- o
!•- »
CO *





0 0
• •
ru -<
^ f^ *«
•Z. Kl
3t
UJ
<_>
CC
c
u.
•z.
UJ

UJ
u
cc
CO CO
cc
">~ UJ
tr •—
« cc
Z < CO
0 =) Z
•-i SS 0
-< < cs
t- UJ UJ
co x tr

in cr >-
o x tr
Kl
-<
ru « f-
• «* *
in a ru
O1 IV O
in CD ru
ru


o o o
-• ru o

I
O 00
a — cc>
•• ru
O- Kl O
CD •*> 0
* 00
— Kl _
O
t—

3
O


m ru
c» •

rw ru





o -o
• •
a o
o cc
in co
JT

















< _i
0 *
W f™^
•- O

•z.
cc «
0. «-
O- O
•< UJ
f.

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      j
      1:  DECiSiON UNIT OVERVIEW
     0£CSS!ON UNiTTlTLs UNO CC'D£)                     HQ0RD       MEDIA: Alr

Transportation;  Health Effects  (A105)	*£a	APPRO: R  S D
B)   LONG  RANGE  GOALS AND MAJOR OBJECTIVES

      Provide health effects  data  to  the regulatory program office on air
pollutants  emitted  from mobile sources.  These data are used by the office
to  determine whether any regulatory  action  is required to protect the public
from these  emissions.   The principal activity in  the near term is to obtain
a health  effects data  base on diesel exhaust products so the program office
can tall  industry whether large numbers of  diesel-povered vehicles will be
permitted on the American road.


C)   FT 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      Completed  the  research  on sulfuric acid emissions from oxidation catalyst
equipped  vehicles and  determined  that  the emission levels are too lov to cause
significant health  effects in the public.

      Completed  significant numbers of  various In  vitro screening tests on
    ious components  of  the particulate  fraction of diesel exhaust and found
     particulate contained mutagens and chemicals  that caused neoplastic
      formations in  mammalian cell systems•  Because of these findings, EPA
i is  conducting major research in FT 79  to better understand these ial**a1
findings.                                                                        i
                                                                                  I
      Completed  the  range finding.  Inhalation studies exposing cats, rats, mice     !
iand guinea  pigs to  elevated  levels of  the total diesel exhaust from a light       {
|duty engine. All appropriate biological effects  endpoints were measured to
idetermine whether any  acute  effects  resulted.  No significant acute effects
{were observed in this  50 day study.
                                                                                  i
                                                                                  (
D)   FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION                                                    |
                                                                                  i
      The  FY 79  program will  emphasize  performing  a wide variety of health         |
effects studies to  determine whether diesel exhaust is carcinogenic.  In          \
vitro screening studies will be performed to evaluate the relative potency of     i
diesel exhaust  particulate and similar materials  for which there is >*"rg^         j
epidemiological data.   In vitro non-inhalation studies will compare diesel        !
;particulate and these  similar materials to  determine which materials produce      ';
•tumors.  Whole  animal  inhalation  studies will expose normal and special strains   1
;of  rodents  to total diesel exhaust to  determine whether tumors develop.  Other
inon-carcinogenie studies with whole  animals will  focus on chronic obstructive
.lung disease and neurobehavioral  effects.   The epidemiological research will
   gus on  reviewing  the Important  studies found in the literature and Identifying
     field studies that should be  performed.

-------
                ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

    2J  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIA?  AIR
05  HEALTH  EFFECTS-TRANSPORTATION SRCS-AIR     APPRO!  R  & D

 RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY 80  INCR*"*FY*eo"cUM
       POSITIONS  PFT         a6.0         49.0          37.0         37.0
EVEL              OPFT        .   8.0          3.0           3.0          3.0
 OF  °7            PTE                       53.3          a7.3         «7.3
 BUDGET AUTH.  COOO.O)     5,227.0      5,825.0      «,369.0      4,369.0

1 DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
  OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
:tivities

    o   Complete the whole an-Ting i studies at  HESL/Cincinnati where normal and
       special strains of rodents  inhale diesel exhaust products from light
       duty vehicle engines for selected time periods.  The principal bio-
       logical effect being evaluated is carcinogenicity.  Several studies
       ranging from, counting tumors to observing changes in enzyme levels
       believed precursors to the  onset  of tumors, are being performed.
       Limited studies evaluating  the effects of diesel exhaust on neurolog-
       ical and behavioral activity, and pulmonary function and noncarcino-
       genic chronic lung disease  are being  performed.

    o   Complete the limited whole  animal non-inhalation studies at EEBL/BIP.
       These studies will evaluate under various dose regimes of diesel
       exhaust particulate or the  organic  extract from light duty vehicle
       engines whether tumors will develop.  These studies include intratra-
       cheal instillation and skin painting. _ .Complete.limited, identical,
       parallel studies on the same species  with materials of similar compo-
       sition to diesel exhaust particulate.  The materials selected will be
       based on epidemiological data that  relates their frirTman exposure to
       excess cancer.  The data from these parallel studies will permit the
       comparison of the potency of the  diesel exhaust with the "known"
       material as they relate to  human  cancer potential.

    o   Continue performing limited studies using the in vitro screening tests
       such as Ames, BALB3T3,as "analytical  tools" for helping in identifying
       specific components in the  diesel exhaust from light duty vehicle
       engines that require emissions control.  Also, use these tests to
       consider changes in emissions with  changes in engine design, opera-
       tion, or after combustion emission eoi*troi*-dev±ces.

    o   Continue modifying the in vitro screening systems to make them applic-
       able  to identifying which components  of the diesel exhaust are biolog-
       ically active.

    o   After contractor review of  the existing epidemiological data on occu-
       pational and public exposure to diesel exhaust products, determine
       whether any field studies will provide useful data.  If warranted,
       start an epidemiological field study  on one selected population.


       0024

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
     DECISION UNITT!TL£ (AND CODE)

  ansportation:  Health Effects (A105)
                    HQ

                    REG.
MEDIA: Air

APPRO: R &
LEVEL
1 OF 7

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     o Continue a response capability that provides rapid health assessments
        on new pollutants that may be emitted from 1978-80 model year motor
        vehicles (both catalyst and diesel).  This capability assists Office
        of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control/Office of Air, Noise,  Radiation,
        in its certification program.
     Resources available at this level will permit the key health effects
research to be completed In FT 1980, but will not provide any resources to
be transferred for emissions levels measurement and characterization, for
ambient dispersion modelling of diesel and other automotive emissions, and
for roadway and roadside monitoring of motor vehicle pollutant levels.  These
  tivities determine the extent to which the population is exposed under
   ious real conditions, and provide essential data for the development of
  equate control strategies.  This data base should be established concur-
rently to permit sound regulatory action.  These other programs rely heavily
Jon OEEZ's transfer of resources.  If these resources are not made available
then the diesel health effects research program will not continue and no EPA
health data will be available for the program office when it considers
issuing a certificate to the manufacturer.
                                                                     JU25

-------
           ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
ISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE         HQ       M£DIA|  AIR
EALTH  EFFECTS-TRANSPORTATION  SRCS-AIR     APPRO!  R & 0

OURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY  79 C.  E.   FY 60  INCR    FY 80 CUM
  POSITIONS  PFT         «6.0         49.0           7,0         44.0
              OPFT       .   8.0           3.0                        3.0
07            FTE                      53.3           3.5         50.8
GET  AUTH.  (000.0)     5,227.0      5,825.0         874.0      5,243.0
      THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
 FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

:iea

  Conduct  animal toxlcological  studies on those emission products that,
  based on the rapid health assessments, require further investigation.
  These studies will provide a  broader data base for addressing the
  uncertainty over whether certification should be withheld.

  Expand the number of samples  and  different in vitro screening tests
  that are performed in level 1. This will provide information on more
  parameters that may affect the composition of the diesel exhaust «n^
  suggest  better control strategies.

  Continue obtaining trend data at  the LACS site on the ambient air
  impact from reducing automobile emissions through new emission control
  devices .

  Continue measuring ambient air at a  few downtown locations where diesel
  powered  vehicle traffic is substantial.  This will provide data on the
  quality  and types of pollutants that diesels contribute to the ambient
  air pollution.

  Continue characterizing emissions from a few 1979-80 model year light
  duty vehicles under limited operating conditions.
 sources  at this level will permit limited additional response capability
L by providing health effects data on new emission products.  If these
:es are not available then the non-health related work will not be funded
 , health  data on non-diesel emissions will be based on information, if
lat is  in the published literature.  EPA will not have sufficient research
  to determine whether the motor vehicle manufacturers are introducing
es whose  emissions are hazardous to the public health.

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
     ECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE         HQ   .    MEDIAi  AIR
      HEALTH  EFFECTS-TRANSPORTATION  SRCS-AlR     APPROi  RID
8. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACTFY  T^E    FY8o
         POSITIONS  PFT         46.o         49.0                       44  o
 LEVEL              OPFT          8.0          3.0                        3)0
06 OF  07            FTE                      53.3                       50  8
   BUDGET AUTH.  (000. 0)     5,227.0      5,825.0      1,000.0      6,243.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND TH6 CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

 Activities
         Introduce into various in vitro screening systems,  selected diesel
         exhaust particulat*  samples obtained from representative heavy duty
         2 and 4 stroke engines Ci.e.. truck and bus engines).  This screening
         will identify which  components are biologically active and whether
         there are substantial differences between the composition and biological
         activity among the engines.  This screening will also  indicate whether
         mutagenicity and  carcinogenicity are important biological endpoints to
         investigate using whole »«*™ai<»-

         If mutagenicity and  carcinogenicity are important,  conduct limited
         whole animal  non-inhalation tests such as intratracheal instillation
         and akin painting on the heavy duty diesel exhaust  particulate and
         compare with the  light duty diesel exhaust particulate results.

         If the resources  allocated to bullet 2 above are not required, these
         resources will be used in this activity.  Complete  the expanded whole
         ani-ma] non-inhalation, studies begun in 77 79 at HEEL/RIP.  These studies
         will use subcutaneous injection, trachea! translocation besides intra-
         tracheal instillation and skin painting to provide  stronger additional
         data on whether tumors will develop.  Complete the  expanded identical
         parallel studies  on  the same animals with other "known" materials (see
         level 1).
 Impact
      This level permits  OBD  to produce health effects data on diesel exhaust
 products from trucks and buses and to compare with the extensive  data base
 being obtained for diesel-powered automobiles.  Without this  funding EPA will
 have no hard data to support the need to regulate for health  purposes diesel
 truck and bus exhaust.
                                                                    0027

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
.„.——«•—-•—.-•—•.—•-.«———«••—•""—•-""-•-«••"•"-•-•*-••«•-
A.  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA|  AIR
A105 HEALTH  EFFECTS-TRANSPORTATION  SRCS-AIR     APPRCf  R & D

B*"RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 7°- c.  E.  FY  so  INCR    FY so  CUH
         POSITIONS   PFT         «6.o          y.o          2.0         ae.,0
  LEVEL              OPFT      •    8.0           3.0                        3.0
07  OF 07             FTE                       53.3             1         50.9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)    5,237.0      5,835.0      1,000.0      7,243,0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
     o  Develop, techniques to measure the health effects of commuters and
        roadside pedestrians/residents who are exposed  to motor vehicle-
        related pollutants.  These techniques vill include:  the assembling
        in mobile vans of motor vehicle pollutant monitors that measure pollu-
        tant levels  on a real time basis, the determination of which non-
        invasive and permittable invasive techniques  to use to measure the
        health effects associated with exposure to the  individual pollutants,
        and the processes for selecting the areas and study populations to use
        based on availability of medical histories and  exposure patterns.  Bits
        and pieces of these techniques have been used for other purposes.  This
        effort will  combine these techniques and develop methodology for appli-
        cation to this purpose.
     o  Once developed,_ begin epidemiolpgical studies on-selected populations
        exposed to different mixes of car, truck, and bus traffic, to evaluate
        the contribution of motor vehicle pollutants  to significant health
        effects.
     o  Complete the evaluation of the relative contribution that the gaseous
        and particulate components of the exhaust from  diesel powered automo-
        biles have on the observed health effects.
     o  Develop improved methods for assessing the health effects associated
        with pollutants that enter the human body through various non-inhalation
        routes.
Impact
     EPA does not have hrnnn-n epidemiological data on populations exposed to
motor vehicle emissions.  It does not accurately know whether  substantial seg-
ments of the commuter population and populations living  near roadways suffer
from the elevated levels of motor vehicle pollutants. EPA does not know on a
localized basis whether its vehicle emissions control program  is sufficiently
protecting those segments of the population most exposed.  This research will
provide the data base to make these assessments.
     A substantial portion of the in vitro and in vivo non-inhalation research
focuses only on the particulate components of diesel exhaust.  It is important
to know whether the gaseous component causes significant adverse health effects,
     More information is needed on which route of exposure causes the principal
health effect so EPA can best protect the public health  when the public
contacts a pollutant having various routes of exposure.

       0028

-------



















2
(J
^f
>•
z cr
o •«
>-i r
p_ y
U 3
UJ CO
O u>
a u
cv or
_1 0
« CO
•- UJ
z or
UJ
I t-
z •-»
o z
or =>
> z
UJ «-i
CO
CO «
UJ U
>- UJ
« c
CO —
0
UJ ^"
>- or
z u.
=1
CC.
<
1
CC
u
or
CO
z
_.
^>
<
•- c:
z c
UJ 0.
o. z
o «
_J a
UJ t-
> i
UJ CO
0 •-
u
•d uj
U.
X u.
U UJ
EL.
<. I
UJ t-
CO _1
UJ <.
or bj
I
<
< tn
o
-0 —
ru «

9
CC
0-


Kl
CO
o- >-*
-• eo
bJ
r
•-*
to
UJ
CO Z
C*" ••*
—• z
z
<
O-

CO
o-
r*






bJ
0 f
00 <
0 _l
— n
3:
=1
u



z
UJ
O I
CO UJ
o- or
••• u
z



*—
O*- UJ
r~
o- or
n
u




_i
^ ^
o >—
— u


























o ru
CC CO
-c ru
KI ru
a ru
o ru
rjT gT
4) ru
KI ru
9 ru


o ru
O CO
•o ru
KI ru
« *
9 ru

o ru
tf &
-o ru
KI ru
» »
a ru




c c o ru o o KI
•o r- o- ru KI 9
Kir* jn ru
« « » ^
9 — ru ru





o o o ru o o KI
c* «> — co r- KI r-
•o r*- o^ ru KI 9
Kir- tn ru
« » ^ ^
9 — ru ru




o o o CD o o KI
in •- 9 o o- KI KI
ru r^ in r^ 9 in
 9
ruin r- «
in ru ru ru







.^
o
o
O t-
«* t— u. u
C « 0 0- O U,
• uj oi o -* >-•
U. I CO 3 O
D >- zs r; •» —
=>o < -^ to
— « x or z
O •— CO O
t- Z X >- t->
_l UJ •— UJ •« t-
U* CJ> ^* ^^ J >-*
> C >— CO
uj z> no
_i re o a.
o o-
r*\ Kl
9 P*
ru •£>
in ru
o e-
K? K?
9 F~-
ru -o
in ru


o c*
Kl K?
9 *^
ru *
» ^
in ru

o o-
Kl Kl
9 r-
ru -c
« «
m ru




0 O O O O 0 CO

ru » -« 4)
« * ^ *
in niKi ru





o o o r- o tn
9 * CO in f- Kl
r- in — 9
go Ktm 9






o o o cc o o KI
tn -< 9 o o KI KI
ru f~ in »~ 9 in
CC Kl 9 rj-
m ru KI rw





0 O 0 1C O O
r- o r~ m •*> co
ru o ru ^ 9
ru in r*- -o
in ruru ru







f*
o
o
o »-
M 1— U. UJ
0 < 0 0, O U.
• u or o ^ ^
b. X CO IT O
o •- n r *» —
n o •* •" co
ru <; I or z
C t- CO O
»- z x >- >-•
_» bJ «•« UJ •< >-
UJ (J> »-^ ^^ _J *-^
> C •-«>
UJ 3 no
_i IE o a.
0 t>
Kl Kl
9 CO
ru —
« Kl
o o-
Kl Kl
9 CO
ru —
•C Kl


0 t>
Kl Kl
9 CO
ru —
^ *
•« Kl

0 O-
Kl Kl
9 CO
ru —
^ ^
•O Kl




0 O O O- C O CD
Kl 9 O- Kl 9 Kl O
9 KI o CO 9 in
ru KI c> •-
fc * ^ *
•o ru KI KI





0 O O O
o o o =>
0 O O —
o ru co in
»
W4




O O 0 
in ru KI ru





o o o «o o o
^- o ^* in -c co
ru o ru •£ 9
ru in r» «
m ru ru - 3 z «0 —
n o < v* 05
•o •< X or z
c >-co o
I- 2 X >- M
_l UJ ~ UJ •< t-
UJ C5 ^« ^» _J »-«
> O >— CO
uj n no
-tec. co.
0 t>
Kl Kl
9 O
ru -o
r» Kl
o rj-
Kl Kl
9 C-
ru -C
»- Kl


0 0-
Kl Kl
9 O
ru -c
^ ^
»». Kl

o o-
Kl Kl
9 O-
ru -D
^ ^
r- KI




o o o o- o o o
Kl 9 O- Kl * Kl O
9 Kl O O*- 9 in
ru 9 co *
» ^ * ^
r» ru 9 KI





o o o o o «•
o o o o ru
o o o —
o — o- in
»
V*




0 O O «D O O Kl
in — 9 o er KI KI
ru t- in t~ 9 in
CD Kl 9 O
in ru KI ru





0 O O CO O O
r^ o r*- in •£ co
ru o ru * 9
ru in r- «
in ruru ru







.*"•*
o
o
e> t—
"> I— U- UJ
c < c o- c u.
• uj a: o v <~f
u. x eo n o
o *•• n i f& ••

^ < x or z
c >- co o
t- z x >- «
_JUJ — UJ •« •-
LU CB — -^ _I —1
> d t- m
uj n no
_i cc o a.
            «o
            r-
             •
            t>
'  Q
^ 3

-------
  U

  UJ


  z
  O

  O
  01

  O
  rr
  a.
  > «*
  Z w
  UK
    LU
    oo
    3
    a.

    O
    D
    Z
    O
0035

u *a
•rl
•j^
< O
5 ?
LU a.
S <




o
£S
o
C LU














LU
LU
-i
40 j
2 ^
S "
$ J

— 1
a. f*
S -
0 w
0 LU
jjjj
^ LU
3 >
i S
0 i
> UJ
vu
-J
!
I
s
LU
S)
5 -,-
*• o
> z
u. o.
UJ
s <
U. LU
0 1
^1
^s '

CB ^
2 2Z
— U
LU 4)
sis
S
•i" p^
••J •"*
^
M»

_ o
— » 0_1
" a
Z AJ
-— rt
*0 Q^
y to
uj C
eg
<
vs
u.
5
£
UJ
-J
w
*

UB
•z.

1
»
""
i
*• >
u
u
~





9^0 o en o\ o i
i>. co co r-» r- 00 3
O O 0 O O O -5
CO O 0 0 O u
»-i ON «r ^i ^ o> o
i-( O O ~J i-f O O
•a
r^. r» o) -o
•O a)
O i-t O -H 41
O ffl O > C
to CO
3 O -H O U ffl
o - i-f iw r-i a. a


1 ^ M-l
•a -o o
ffl G 3
co 41 ij e to
1-1 a. co o o u
•O « 4J Tt 0 1
3 -a ft -u oi e c
4J ffl t) Lj M i-ic4> a ffl ffl
M -H T-l ffl 03 C 80
41 AJ y l-t iJ 01 ffl -H S
r-t 4) 41 ? ffl C r-t 4) -H
O r-( Q. 43 41 ON O-HiHOO S
jz & o AJ 3 so r-. js ^ ffl c u
3 S U ffl O 1 330)1-1 O
O 01 O S I-l AJ^AJ U-(
4)CJCJ«TO(A4COiHi-^ 4I09CJC M
AJHffl^SOlOIWX 13 C i-l ffl CL>
uscu -o a ja o AJ a. to
AJ j -H IWM> a AJAJMCOI s
4) ffi M 60 WDOOlAJ 4)tQA^J *H ,2 C
'•H &J a C 4) ^ U4 «C ffl f«4 f^ C *^ AJ *H
S "" 1 1 S J2 1 1 1 C
O AJ 1 I O C 1 1 1 O
o a o -H u
O no
1
. u
CO O, V4
* o
o> o IM
01 Q AJ
3 .= CO >,
» C M 41 -H
4) O 0 A <-4
IM a Cu w -H
41 41 .a
ffl >-l M tC O
a » « a.
o) w a at o
Jti 4> -3  M o «a o
CO AJ CU fl) 3 4) AJ
4i co AJ e AJ a e
•HO e o eg e 4)
•O 0) 41 -H -H OS
3 «H Ji AJ -O C< CO
AJ^aj >» a <— i coco
CO 2 AJ 00 C 41 414)
AJ O i-l -H Lj ffl
00 ffl ffl rH 3 UH CO
C b O U 4) fl
•H 01 4) i-l 4) S 3
e g ,= s J->u c j=
41 O AJ 41 4) O 

-------
   a
   2
   UJ
   a



   it
   U H
   1M ^J
   i- 3
   og
   — s
   Z >
   UJ r-

   2 <
   O
   C

   >
£ =
     w

     2

     |

     w

     a.

     O
      S
u. a.
UJ
s<
W
o.
"-i;
^sJ UJ
i e
IANDCQDF)
th Effects
rH

•^ 2
^™ s
?
""* ••
II
c «
'LJ cu
LE «, MEASUI
p»
"^
^
H*
Z
UJ






^ ^ 4J
O Q. O ON Q. O O.
GO M 03 P- M 00 M
0 i-4 O O r-4 O tH
O ffl 0 O 01 O «t
e c c
!•» ^ OO f-( -rt 0» -rt
O O
C ffl 41 4» AJ O ffl CUIW ffl ffl -H
Q)l44) JSO 4^O Q4JM
i-t 4j ffl -o a cu ffl AJ ffl c ffl
ffl ffl -H 41 0 ffl X 3 « « >
3 -O AJ > ^ MO 4> 4i O3 MW
^ a o 3 *J fi 4> a o 3 4=
Cl4JSUi*4 CO TJ H ffl tO>C <»-( r-( 00
ffl 3 AJ 0.1-4 ffl T3 3 0 C fflX 

-H 4) 4) AJ M O 60 4) ffl O O 4) 4J ffl iH > 0 ffl B K-( -r4 T3Q.M i-13-Or-l O atu< a 4) a jS a -H 41 3 o AJ tj B^-g •O 41 S t3 AJ O 4) 4> ffl OOVW TH S 3 AJ O 4) AJ -Cl -HO-H O 0 3O-O ><*4« T-i fflUJ=0)ON C 41 ffl TH J TH rHO.IV O<4-I4S ^!M a. ffl *J S r- ?s ^ cu ffl Su^ men MOIJJ i i u - S < at < M = C X O 143 U i-l 41 rH 41 > O 4) O. fi me u -H 4) IAJ s TS a > u a S a j= w a o c S i-i T3 AJOOI TH 4) o TH jj 4) O, 41 i-l O O 4) O.J= U 4) 41 O, i-l AJ JJU 03 >> AJ O, ffl 4) 4) O AJ AJ 1 C. a C e 11 a -3 J3 4) OAJr-l ffl -U OldrH O 4) 4) ffl i TX ^H ^ G — rH ^ U y CO>OrHrH4>rH.S 0) 1 ^ a. a 41 T3 a a. 41 01 -H -H 41 g o»sv 41 AJ AJ i «a a ^ a- 41 AJ a > UH — oo a a y 41 > ao a 3 1 O S 4) ffl 51 O 4) UH 4) 4) ffl O O-4-H 4)64=0 1 u TH -a 3 -o y a 41 > oa a AJ o AJ T3 O
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 :ORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Criteria Pollutants:  Health Eff»r*«
HQ

REG.
MEDIA:  Air

APPRO:  R & p
B)  LONG RANGE GOALS AND MAJOR OBJECTIVES

    By 1985 EPA oust present an updated health data base to support maintenance
or revision of the Ambient Air Quality Standards-(AAQS).

     The major goal of research performed between 1980 and 1984 is to improve
substantially the existing health effects data base on. those pollutants for
which AAQS have been set.  This research will include both acute and chronic
animal toxicology studies, controlled human exposure (clinical) studies, and
epidemiology studies.  Major emphasis-will be placed upon designing and perform-
ing studies which permit EPA to assess the health effects which result when
the public is exposed to ambient levels of the AAQS pollutants.  From these
data the Agency can assess standards more effectively and devise margins of
safety based on hard data..
C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

       Toxicology Studies
     Inhalation exposure studies were completed to assess the effects of short-
 erm exposure to nitrogen dioxide alone and in combination with ozone.  The
combination was found to have additive systemic effects.  Data generated from
variable exposures to these gases both with and without the added stress of
elevated temperature will be useful to support chronic exposure studies in FY 79

Human Clinical Studies
     Four groups of experiments were completed to assess the effects of ozone
on human physiologic parameters.  Included in the findings was evidence that
exercise is one of the major determinants of physiologic response to ozone.
Evidence was also found that, in healthy subjects, decrements in pulmonary
function due to ozone disappear after 3 to 4 days of ozone exposure.

epidemiology Studies
     A study was completed in California on alternative methodologies  for
sollection of data in epidemiology studies on chronic  respiratory  disease.
Another study was completed in Los Angeles to evaluate the health  effects of
ahotochemical oxidants on asthmatics,  patients with chronic bronchitis,
ithletes, and outdoor workers.  Development studies are being conducted  to
issess the mobility of populations near  fixed air-monitoring sites and to
Improve methods of statistical analysis.
                                                                     0033
EPA Form 2410-10 1.3-73)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HQQRD

Criteria-Pollutants:  Health Effects (A11C)         REG.         APPRO:R & D
D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION  -

    The program for FY 79 includes animal toxicology and controlled human
exposure (clinical) studies which assess the adverse health responses
associated with exposure to one or more criteria pollutants.  Animal and
  man studies will first focus on effects resulting from exposure to com-
binations of ozone and sulfur dioxide.  These studies will be followed by
similar ones on the effects of exposure to carbon monoxide and nitrogen
oxides.  The animal studies will  employ various combinations and exposure
times to identify additive or synergistic effects on the respiratory system.
The clinical studies will address the effects of short-term exposure on healthy
volunteers and on those in whom asthma-like respiratory symptoms have been
induced pharmacologically.
       003^

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

Non-Criteria Pollutants:  Health Effects (A115)
                                                    HQ OSL
MEDIA. Air

APPRO: R &  D
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                              FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 30 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
1 OF 8

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
1
1












  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

 particulate standard which is too stringent and unnecessarily protective of
 the public health.

      The epidemiological study will provide supporting data which, when
 considered along with the an^"ql toxicology and clinical studies  data, will
 strengthen our understanding of the health effects of airborne particulate
 natter as a function of size and composition in a real world situation.  These
 research results will enable the Administrator to refine a total  or develop
 an inhalable particulate standard in 1985.  Failure to fund this  study will
 leave a serious gap in our health effects data base which cannot  be filled
 by an-final toxicology or controlled human clinical studies alone.

      EPA has very little data on the actual health effects that result when
 people in metropolitan areas suffer through air pollution episodes.  The
 pollution control measures that are taken during episodes have dramatic
 impacts on the region's economy.  These control measures are taken to protect
 the public health from irreversible harm.  The degree of protection required
 may be too extreme or not sufficient.  EPA must have a better health data
 base during episodes to determine what degree of control is sufficient.  This
 research effort will begin the assemblage of this important data  base.
S?A Farm 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA;  AIR
AH5  HEALTH  EFFECTS-NON-CRITERIA PLTNTS-AIR     APPRDj  R i D

8. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY 8Q  IMCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         87.0        12a.O          19.0         112.0
 LEVEL             OPFT          6.0          10.0           2.0          10.0
02 OF  08            FTE       '  •           112.1          12.«         132.3
   BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)     7,039,0     10,355,0      1,396,0      8,375,0
 C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Animal Tosicology
     o  Complete acute animal, toxicological studies using  various particulate
        species and sizes to determine the importance of size on adverse
        health effects.  Compounds to be studied are defined  la the Inhalable
        Particulates report but nay be refined based on new monitoring infor-
        mation derived from ES3L or SSL airborne particulate matter character
        ization studies.

Enidemiological Studies
     o  Conduct epidemiologies! studies to assess the effects of exposure to
        different  sulfate compounds and concentrations with the emphasis on
        sulfuric acid, arnmrnilim sulfate and ammonium bisulfate.  The principle
        thrust  of  these studies will determine if adverse health responses
        are a function of individual species or is characteristic of sulfate
        compounds  in general.

Environmental Assessment Studies
        Stlmalate interagency cooperation on prevention of environmental cancer
        and  heart and lung disease through the activities of the Task Force on
        Environmental Cancer and Heart and Lung Disease which is chaired by the
        EPA  Administrator.

        Recommend comprehensive strategies to reduce  or eliminate risks of
        cancer  or other diseases and other such measures as may be appropriate
        to prevent or reduce the incidence of environmentally related cancer
        and  heart and lung disease.

        Continue  arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences for a
        limited number of reports on air pollutants based on comprehensive
        public  health studies and investigations.  These reports will help in
        defining  what health effects research to perform in the future.
laroact
     The toxicology conducted at this level  will provide additional information
needed to clarify  the roles of sise and chemical species on health effects
caused by particulates.  An understanding  of this relationship is necessary
to the development of a sound regulatory policy on particulates.

-------
                       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
   A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
                                                     HQ
    Non-Criteria Pollutants:   Health Effects (A115)   REG.
                                MEDIA. Air
                                APPRO: R &
   8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 30 INCH.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
2 Qr- 8

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
1 1













   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       Epidemiclogic studies on sulfate species  will  provide additional infor-
  mation to enable the Administrator to determine whether or not a  general
  sulfate standard or a species-specific  sulfate standard is warranted.  This
  data base will add significantly to our understanding of sulfate  toxicity
  derived from animal toxicology and human clinical studies, and provide a
  definitive reassessment of the findings on sulfate  effects uncovered  in the
  early CHESS studies.

       The Clean Air Act Amendments recognize the impact of pollution on public
  health and the potential for  decreased  health  costs through a cleaner environ-
  ment.  The role of the Task Force is to coordinate  and focus the  work of the
  agencies involved.  This level supports the Task Force's efforts  to reduce
  health costs  through environmental measures.   Failure to fund at  this level
     1 delay reduction in the incidence of environmentally caused chronic
     ease.
       The national Academy of Sciences (1TAS)  has  for years  provided  the Agency
  with authoritative reports on pollutants.  Without  the funding  provided at
  this level,  it would be necessary to  terminate the  arrangement  and,  therefore,.
  examine what is already known about, a few  of the important pollutants.
r
 £PA Form 2JIO.11

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

 FORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 A,  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       M£DIAj  AIR
 A115  HEALTH  £FFECTS-NON«CRITERIA PLTNTS-AIR     APPRO:  R  & D

[8.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT FY  79 C, E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM )
          POSITIONS  PFT         87.0        124.0          12.6        124.0,
  LEVEL             OPFT          6.0         1C.O                       10.0
 03  OF 08            FTE                     112.1           6.0        138.3
     BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)     7,039.0     10,355.0        930.0      9,305,0
  C  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Activities
        Continue to analyze and report  on validated Community Health and
        Environmental Surveillance Study (CHESS) data sets.

        Using the alveolar macrophage,  mutagenic and carcinogenic screening
        test systems (in vitro) and the infectivity model (in vivo)  evaluate
        the toxic effect of selected trace metals found In air to predict
        possible public health consequences.  (R10-1/15)

        Provide additional episode response capability to complement level 1
        activities by going out to locations where air pollution levels are
        elevated in order to evaluate the health effects observed in selected
        members of the general population.  The Clinical Laboratory  Evaluation
        and Verification of Epidemiologic Results (CLEVER) van will  be employed.
 Imoact
      The CHESS epidemiological studies were completed several years ago  at
 great expense.  Analysis of this unique and important data base requires a
 continued effort in FY 80.  Without this effort, a significant portion of the
 CHESS data will remain unreported and, therefore, useless to regulators.

      Metals represent a potentially serious health threat affecting many body
 systems.  Continued research is needed on metals.  The in vitro and in vivo
 research at this level will identify the metals which should be researched
 first,  and focus later toacicological and epidemiological research.   Without
 this  research an evaluation of health effects caused by metals may  be delayed,
 incomplete or inadequately focused.

      Many areas in the country suffer from air pollution episodes.   The  CLEVER
 mobile physiological testing facility makes it possible to document the  health
 effects resulting from these episodes.  Without this response capability it
 is difficult to assess the gravity of air pollution episodes In a particular
 area  and to determine the appropriate control measures.
       OU53

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

   FORM 2:  DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
      DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAj  AIR
    115 HEALTH EFFECTS-NON.CRITERIA  PLTNTS-AlR     APPROj  R  & D
   ^^••••^^^^^••^^^^^••^^^•••^^••^^•^••M — ••».•••. — •—. — — •••»•• — • — —	••••••••••	• •
              -w-—^^^—• — ^^"-— — ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W « M ^ ^ m ^ v w «• ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ wt ^ V ^ 9 9 ^ •* V • HI • • ^ V flP W W •
   8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. E.  FY 80  INCR   FY  80 CUM j
            POSITIONS  PFT         87.0        124.0          5,0        129.0
    LEVEL              OPFT          6.0         10.0                       10.0
   06  OF 08             FTE       '               112.1          4,2        H2.5
      BUDGET  AUTH, (000.0)     7,039.0    10,355.0      3,200,0    12,505,0
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES Or THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Activities
  Toxicology
       o  Further develop and validate more sophisticated rapid screening
          methods to assess  adverse health responses to large numbers of air
          pollutants associated with ambient particulate.  Collect ambient  par-
          ticulate and begin testing for biological activity.  Perform confir-
          matory tests on collected ambient particulate using higher-order  in
          Tfitro and in vivo  systems.

  Epidemiological Studies
 !
          Initiate an epidemiologic study in several appropriate areas in the
          country to assess  the health  effects on populations exposed to trace
          metals from non-smelter  industrial sources such as municipal inciner-
          ation and fossil fuel combustion.
                                                     •

          Initiate an epidemiologic study In several appropriate areas of the
          country to assess  the health  effects on populations-exposed to
          airborne gaseous and  particulate organic compounds.  These early
          studies should focus  on  major classes of organic compounds rather
          than specific compounds  and concentrate on those living in the
          vicinity of petrochemical industries.  Data from the Houston study
          should be helpful  in  the design of more definitive studies.

          Expand the research on episodic localized air pollution discussed at
          level 3 to include larger numbers of individuals and additional
          locations.
  Impact
^fln
       Unless further development  and validation of rapid screening tests  are
  undertaken, assessment of adverse health responses to large numbers of air
  pollutants will be inadequate.   It is not possible to individually study the
  many hundreds of compounds known to be present in ambient air by using
  classical techniques.   Rapid screening tests can allow the Agency to zero
  in on those pollutants which have a high degree of probability of causing
  possible adverse health effects.
     Epidemiological studies are needed to assess  the  effects of trace metals
  d organic  compounds on populations to fill in data gaps  in relating point
source emissions to observed health effects.  Population exposure data in

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE IAND CODE)
Non-Criteria Pollutants: Health Effects (A115)
HQ OED
REG.
MEDIA. Air
APPRO: R & D
LEVEL
6 OF 8

POSITIONS PFT] i
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
1












  S. RESOURCE SUMMARY
                               FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. cST.   FY 30 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE TH£ BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
conjunction with
                         toxicity  and bioassay  test results can lead to the
 development of new ambient air  and  emission standards to protect the public
 health.

      EPA oust know whether the  air  pollution episode control measures it
 institutes adequately or overly protects  the public health.  This research
 will provide those answers (see level  3 impact statement) .
5? A Form 2410-11 (8-73)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

 FORM  21  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
  W4P V • W •• W * • V • V 41 V •> • W • • • •• • •> • M • IVIB • • V • • M • M • • • M • M • «• M • • • M • M ^  M • ^  ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^  ^ ^ M
  . DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       M£DIA|  AIR
  115  HEALTH EFFECTS-NON-CRITERIA PLTNTS-AIR     APPROj  R & D
  ** — **"*l***'*^** — ********** — **W4>»***'**»«**«»-«l«t««l»««f**«»W4r*l**»W»M«l»« ^•^•^^•^^^^^^^^
 B. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C, E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT         87.0        124,0          3.0        132.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          6.0         10.0                      10,0
 07 OF 08            FTE       '              112.1           2.5        1«5.0
    BUDGET AUTH,  (000.0)     7,039.0     10,355,0     3,300,0     15,805.0
  C  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Activities

 Toxicology.

      o  Develop or adapt more sophisticated  impaired animal models which
         mimic key susceptible groups  in  human populations.  The health data
         obtained from these models  will  permit the extrapolation to Vmrnflnq Of-
         the likely adverse health responses  from exposure to air pollutants.

      o  Conduct preliminary animal  toxicology studies to assess the effects
         of pollutant exposure via the inhalation, ingestion, and skin
         absorption routes of  entry.  Many pollutants can enter the body
         through various pathways.   This  research will identify for selected
         high exposure pollutants, how significant each route of entry is
         relative to the observed health  effects.

 Epidemiology

      o  Design an epidemiology study to  identify areas and populations where
         multi-routes of exposure predominate.

      o  Conduct epidemiologic studies in areas' of the country where different
         species and concentrations  of nitrate are present to determine from
       .  patterns of adverse health  responses in these areas whether a species-
         specific or a general standard is needed for nitrates.  Determine from
         these studies and those in  Level 2 on sulfates the incremental
         differences in'numbers, types, and severity of adverse health responses
         resulting from exposure to  incremental concentrations of particulates.

      o  Develop new and improved statistical designs and analytical methods
         for population studies and  identify  study areas for assessing new
         pollutant hazards.  This effort  will establish a sound scientific
         basis for performing  the next major  set of epidemiologic studies.
 Support
         Implement an expanded  quality assurance program for inhalation exposure
         studies in animal  toxicology and clinical studies; this will include
         better measures  of the atmosphere that animals and humans are exposed
         to and added statistical analyses of the number of animals or humans

                                                                        OUG1
EPA Form 2410-1 1 (3-73)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    WQ  ORD      MEDIA: Air

  Non-Criteria Pollutants;  Health Effects (A115)    REG>	APPRO: R & D
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY          FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. £ST   FY 80 INCR.    FY SO CUM.
LEVEL
L.QF-JL

" POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
i








1




     DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
         required in the study to .assure valid results.  Devise methods for . •
         assessing the accuracy of health indicator data derived from air'
         pollution epidemiology studies; this is Important because many of .the
         health indicators for documenting the health effects associated with
         oxidant, nitrogen oxides, and particulate pollution are the same
         and one must know which of the pollutants is the major contributor
         .of the observed effects.
 Impacts
      Impaired animal models will allow the Agency to more "accurately extrapo-
 late health effects observed in "ify*! aCudies to humans in key susceptible
 groups.  With few exceptions, most am'mai- toxicology, studies have concentrated
 on normal, healthy animals which do not provide reliable clues to the effects
 which could be anticipated in susceptible humans.  These data can lead to more
 realistic standards by the incorporation of more accurate safety margins.

      Unless epidemiologic studies are performed on populations exposed to
 different" species and concentration of nitrate, standards set for nitrates may
 not be adequately protective or may be too restrictive because of an insuf-
 ficient  health data base.  It is well known that • nitrates, as well as sulfates,
 ear* be formed in the atmosphere as fine particles of different chemical
 species.  The Agency needs to have better understanding of real world exposure
 effects  to determine if  standards are needed.

      Improved study designs, and the locating of study areas in advance of
 the next major round of  epidemiological studies, will assure the study results
 will not be challenged.

      With expanded inhalation exposure studies and population studies, the need
 for a dynamic, expanded  quality assurance program is great.  Failure to Imple-
 ment such a program can  result in inaccurate or even incorrect conclusions based
 on unreliable data.

     . Research to assess  the effects of multi-route pollutant entry may lead
  to  the  development of  integrated, multi-media standards which could be more
 realistic of man's exposure, or to data bases that show what is the critical
 route of exposure to control in order to protect the public.
         IHJ62
EPA Farm 2^10-1 J (3-73)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

   ;FORM 2} DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
     I,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE         HQ       MEUJAj  AIR
     115 HEALTH  EFFECTS-NON-CRITERIA PLTNTS-AIR     APPRO*  R 4 D
   8,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT   Y
            POSITIONS  PFT         87.0        12«,0          2.0        I3«.o
    LEVEL             OPFT          6.0          10.0                       10  0
   08  OF °6            FTE                     112,1          1§6        ia6.6
       BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)    7,039.0     10,355.0      3,500.0     19,305.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   Activities
   Toxicology
t.
     o  Develop and validate more sophisticated rapid screening methods that
        will allow assessment of subtle teratogenic,  mutagenic, central
        nervous system, immunologic and reproductive effects  of large numbers
        of air pollutants in order to quickly identify and prioritize
        harmful pollutants for further whole qn-tmaT  and human studies.

     o  Perform acute or sub-chronic animal toxicological studies to evaluate
        the health effects resulting from exposure of sentry  animals to actual
        rural and  urban dusts.  Systemic as well as respiratory effects should
        be examined and the composition of the dust determined.  Both inhala-
        tion, ingestion, and dermal routes of exposure need to be examined
       • in a-numirer ~of Atypical samples^ collected in areas across the country.
Clinical Studies
           Expand the controlled human  exposure studies using the CLEANS  clinical
           research facility to measure the adverse health responses of normal
           and pharmacologically impaired subjects from acute exposure to
           variable concentrations  of each of several important particulate
           species in combination with  nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide.
           Particular emphasis  will be  placed on the pulmonary irritant capacity
           of surface adsorbed  gases which come into contact with tissue.

           Study the acute respiratory  effects of particles formed from combina-
           tions of gases on human  subjects using the CLEANS clinical research
           facility.  Gas combinations  such as ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur
           dioxide under high humidity  conditions can form fine aerosol particles
           when irradiated.  Both normal and stressed subjects should be  tested.

                   Studies
        o  Perform epidemiclogic  studies to assess the contribution of  exposure
           to certain indoor air  pollutants, such as particulates and organics,
           including formaldehyde,  to total air pollutant exposure resulting  in
           adverse health responses.  Mobility models and personal monitors will
           be incorporated into the study design to improve measures of indus-
           trial exposure.

-------
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UKIT TITLE- AND CODE)                     hQ  ORD      MEDIA.  Air

  Non-Criteria Pollutants:  Health Effects (A115)    REG.         APPRO:  R & D
  3.  RESOURCE SUMMARY           FY 73 ACTUAL  rY 79 C. =37   FY 30 INCH.    FY 30 CUM.
               POSITIONS      PF
                           OPF"
              (BUDGET AUTH. .'000.0)1
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Impacts
      Improved sophisticated rapid screening methods -will enable the Agency to
 more quickly identify potential pollutant threats to human health and to lead
 to improved toxicological,  clinical,  and epidemiologic studies.

      The composition of urban and rural dust can differ considerably yet the
 health threat has not been  well characterized.  Assessing the toxicity to
 sensitive animal species may lead to  clues in understanding the air/soil
 interface and its effect on human health.

      Without expansion of the studies on adverse health responses from
 controlled human exposure to particulates in combination with other gases, the
 human health data base is inadequate  because it does not address real world
 conditions.  Similarly, clinical studies of particles formed from the trans-
 formation of gaseous components can provide insight on real world exposure
 cond^tip_aa...in^-pio±Qchemically-active  areas.-—Tailtir-e-to-undertake these
 studies will deprive the Agency of dose-respnose data which can lead to
 establishing new ambient air and emission standards.

      A lack of data on adverse health responses from indoor air pollutants
 causes gaps in the health data base for developing Ambient Air Quality
 Standards for total human exposure.  It is especially important for developing
 accurate and meaningful air quality standards, to understand the differences
 in exposures between the indoor and outdoor environment.

-------





















u
z
Ul

^
>-
Z Cr
o «
« I
*•- 21
UJ CO
O Ul
IT O
_l O
« CO
•— UJ
z cc
Ul
I t-
Z f"
o z
a: 3
>• z
z o
U) >-
CO
CO «
UJ U
>- UJ
« c
CO »
c.
LL. £
*- c:
2 U.

"" tr
MM
<
|
CO
z
*-
.J
0.

^*
o:
u
z •-
bLt QI
z u
a i
o z
_l O
Ul Z
> i
U> CO
o »-

•t Ul
u.
x u.
O li-
CC
«t 1.
Ul •—
CO _l
UJ «
a ui

^
«; in

* —
M «





CC
&


Kl
CO
O- *^

UJ
fr—
^
X
*-i
*-
co
UJ

«v u
CO Z
0- —i
— z
z
a.



CO
o-
•—





u
O fr-
ee «
cr _|

Z



z
UJ
0 X

cc a
•i {_>
z


>-
CC
a UJ
r-.
er a
— or

o



s s
e *-






























O Kl

c- o
r- to
a in
•C Kl
C K^
O CC
c»- I/)
if in
* Kl


0 Kl
* •
CC ec
c- in
O tft
* Kl


0 Kl

CC CC
f- in
cc in

•C Kl



e o o Kt o o ec
p- c- o in ec —
cr r- IMIA —
^ ^ « ^
* a fM Kl



O O 0 Kl 0 O CC
C- O O O- Kt CO O
i- r~ o in ec —
cc r-~ IM m ««
^ « ^ *
-c a i\j KI



o o o — « o o ~«
u> * cc « a o ru
in o- in eo rvi — • —
KI fu o ru — ~-
^ * « »
o KI t- m
~~


o o o e> o o
o r* f\* ec r* *
KI * r* ec cc
o KI * in
r- KI KI KI








«•*
o
c
o »-
K C* u. UJ
60 ^ _!•-> U. Q. •-
C « O O. C U.
• UJ cr o ^ *^
u. X co 5 e
o t- 3 r « —
s o « " eo
-- < x a z
0 C- CO C
»— Z X >- H*
_! Ul •« Ul < t-
UJ ti ^^ *-* ^ » i-l
> C^ H- CO
Ul = 3 O
_i cc CCL


0 Kl

in —
r^ r-
Kt *\)
co a
0 Kl
in «4
r- r-
KI nj
« »


O Kl
un —
r^. p*.
KI nj
co a


O Kl

in —

Kl f\J

eo a



e o o KI o o KI
m in o VM <\j o f\j
KI a e> «\j — —
^ ^ » »
cc in CM a



o o o o o o a
•c -o o rw o-  cc v« a o cu
in cc in co f\i — • — •
KI nj o ru — —
^ % * ^
o KI r- in
•V*


o o e> o> o o
cc r^ fu cc »•» 
KI -c r- cc co
o KI -c in
r- KI KI KI








•-*
o
0
o c-
•fi c- u. UJ
CO +* _) « U. Q. t-
o « o a. o u
• u> a o « «-<
u x co z> o
o •- r> i i« -
3 o < ** co
ru < x a z
o »— eo o
*— Z X >- HI
_J UJ •« U> « H-
iit f *> ^^ ^^ » ^i*
> C t- CO
UJ r; => o
_j 
• •
in in
o a
Kl C-
cc a
o *
in in
o a
Kl t~
ec a


0 .0
in IT
o a
KI r-
O- a


o *

in in
o a
Kl f-

e> a



o o o « o o KI
in in o in a o cc
o r*. KI a t\t *- KI
Kl 0 CM r- •• -•
» % » ^
o- -G KI a



o o o KI e o
o o o a  o o
CC »- CM CC C- -£
Kl -O f~ CO CC
o KI * in
^» KIKI Kl








^N
0
o
o »-
« c- u. UJ
cc v< _j »-,u. a. >-
c < oa c u.
• uj a: o «-* ^-
U. X CO 13 O
c >- ^ r •» —
— o < »^«r>
Kl < X CC Z
O »- CO O
*— Z X >- I-l
_l UJ — UJ « •-
UJ IS ^ ^ _|««
> O •- CO
UJ Z3 ZlO
_j CD oa


o -c
tt M
in r^
o c-
in KI
CM *
0 -C
in r^
o r^
in KI
IM -C


o «
in r~*
o »--
in KI
CM *


0 «
• •
in c-
o r»
in KI

CM O
^


o o o ^ o o in
in in o c- cc o IM
o r- KI p^ CM -* a
in if> o> KI — • —
« « ^ ^
iv •*> in -c
***


o o o o e> (M
o o o iv in a
O O O Kl
CM l/> r~ •£
* « «
Kl CVJ —



o o o ~« o o —
in * cc •• a o IM
in cc in co IM •» ••
Kl CM O IM — • »^
* * » ^
0 Kl P~ IT
«^


O 0 0 CC 0 O
cc c- IM cc r- «
KI -c c* eo ee
o KI « in
C- Kl Kl Kl








^•^
C
o
c c-
K 1- U. U)
eo-/ _i«-> u. a t-
o < o a. o u.
• ui a: o «.-
u. x eo ~ e
o i- 3 r - »-«
_J UJ "• UJ < C-
UJ IS »* ^- -1 «-l
> O t- «
ui ^ — o
_j cc o a
CO
i
Kl
0*1
• • ec
in o c
O 43
CC 0
in  o
in co


0 *

in o
o -c
CO O

in co
*"


000*0
in in o o IM
O IM CC * Kl
CC t- O 0 •-
^ » ^ »
in * cc cc
™*


0 O O 0 O
O O C Kl Kl
c in in cc
Kl — — *
* * *
Kl Kl —



0 O O — O
in * ec — a
in o in co CM
Kl IM 0 IM —
^ * ^ «
o KI r^ in
*-•


o o o cc o
ec r~ CM cc r-
Kl -C »•- CO CC
o KI * in
P- Kl Kl Kl








^*
O
o
c-
«* H-
CO ^» «l ^H It.
o < o a
• uj cc o
U. X CO 3 O
O I- 3 X f —
2 o < «•• so
r- < x cc z
o i- eo o
I— Z X >- i—
_) UJ — Ul < 1-
UJ CS *-^ ^* _J »-»
> d t— co
u. => =o f ) f, - r
_i cc, o a. UUL 0

-------

















o
z
UJ
cs
<
^
z cr
o <
•i Z
i- r
«j — \
UJ CO
O UI
c u
Q. CH
_J 0
«t CO
*- UJ
z cc
Ul
2: »-
z «—
o z
a 3
> z
Ul «-!
CO
CO i->
UJ LJ
«- U.'
«t C.
*-
' K>
C
u. r
»- a.
z u.
a

<
CO
t-
z
>—
_j
a.
<
»M
cc
UJ

Z «-t
UJ IT
I (J
a. i
c z
_J O
UJ Z
> 1
c »-
(J
•e uj
u.
o u.
cc
< I
UJ t-
05 _(
UJ «
CC lij
X
^
Or r '*« m
UwO .-
o «^
IV <

a
cc
ft


CC
— CO
*~
«
s
f-M
»—
co
UJ
cv u
CO Z
o- ~
z

0-

cc
o-
•rt






UJ

o t—
CO <
^ 	 i
— 3
u


*-
UJ
o z
1C UJ
o cc
-« «J
z



CO
O u.'
tf a.
— K.
—


r~ 33
o- »-
— «
o «
10 in*
K> GC
O* 0*

o ^

in in
O 9
ft CC

O Cf

O -D
in in
O w
« CO
» «
o- o-
••



OO O C 0 « O 0 ^>
o in in in o in =i o *
— a o f\i co si K» — w
-• K> CC =J CC — -«
^ ^ * »
O- O IU O
•rt 4PM



m o o o o o -«
IM o o o in fv «^
O O O CO
to — • sr r-
^ * »
t*> HI •—




o-« o o o ». e o »-
orv in-^o^QGfu
«^ K» tx; o iv ~« »•
» » « «
o m r~ m

o o o o o- c o
« o- r- tvi o- r~ «
f*| - U. UJ
OOU. O 1OO.OU.
^^ «^^ « iti cc O ^B^ ^
u. u. I «o 3 o
o o •-=> r « —
n o f •- «o
f- 1C -« X CC Z
c c i— co o
•— z x >- •-"
_J _1 UJ — UJ < •-
> >• C: 1— CO
ui uj 3? 3 o
_J _l CC O O.

-------
u
•z
LU
z
O

(-
O
Ul
H
o
CC
o.
UJ C

IS

ii
> w
Z CO
wz
  u
  Q.

  2

  C
  u
  C
  Z
  O


  5
  U.'
  G
  O
  LL



a
M *a
•H
•< pa

.. oi
< O
5|
2 <





§
o •
"c
C ui














m
i-i
r-t
OB
01
IU
U
ODE)
Health
u
§•"
^. **
*§
Ul 4J
•J s
KiH
p-3
HC*
|<8
3 i-l
zS
o2
2-g
ou
s 1
0 S
o

£

*
u
a
Z
<
u
s
u
H
•i
H
£
u
«
I
e.
^
f
w
(.
<

A
t
_J
UJ
Ul
J

UJ

Ul
J
*M
_J
Ul
Ul
-J
1
_J
Ul
^
Ul
J
^
J
Ul
^
Ul
•^
J
I
Ul
Ul
•J
o
s
0.
Ul
^
2
Ul


J
»
3
i
t
j
r
5
j
J
•
»

•
»
J
\
j
l
5
:
C

J


















O c*^
CO CO
O O
o o

00 VO
0 O
«** m «n
CO CO CO
0 00
o o o
CM < « •« to oiwrisea u ^^i
"••H0* -HlH -H i^arHt-iCa -rt O U 03 01 a -HiJfl
s'S'iJ'tJ'*<8f y'wi-i.aaao -OOI-H -H a) -UC-H-O
a> 3 a c M M as 3 *< jj ai T3 -H 3 3 s u
•MwIocoCQ.01 c w y to a) r^ i iw u M 3 TS uMCa
^J CO ^-i (4 Of Q O QM Cd 2 ^*H C2(Q CO 4) Cj ^ 4^ 3 (OQJ4) *O
•H C *H ^H ^H fi 2 00 *T3 O ^4 Q« ^J CO ^ *|-j W C
S tM GO S ^ 4) 4) 2 PM Q Q) ^ O O 4) 2 X ON U 'iij fl) S
c^SaiH "° o o MWS •H&" o1*0 c °
Tl O *H M (Q S O C ^^ rC S 4J ^ «£• 00 O (0 f*^ ^W O O O O ^
."Og'-'j^y_c p a •« -H -H am-Htnx *o-5 "aaatS
u-i(2a
ojflac M*O a'QO^J'o oj^sw js oj
o -H 1-1 1-1 B a«wa y«Cu ca yms-nm yaj yo3a»ai>o
"oolmacoiaic TJTJeaoi,ae' -UMOC -OIH -uSljww
r
-------
   U
   z
   UJ

   <
   Z
   g


   UJ

   O

   oZ
   E
   > w
   2 M
   01 H-

     LU
     O
     U
     2
     O
     O
     LU
JUEJ



c
M *8
•H




M
r"
2
01
Za
2
O


u
H
2
3
s

0
C!
>




S
i
i
-J
u

UJ
o
-J
•5!
UJ
J

n
UJ

Ul
J


UJ
UJ
-4
-1
UJ
UJ
_J
cn
5 -,-
" O
> £=
u. a.
UJ
h-
^ S
e» 5
> Sj
U. UJ





•K
UJ
c
3
t/t
^
U.'
•5
a3
UJ
^_

H
2
HI
I
V3
••
^

o
u
u


S3




^
*
«-< en
CO 00
o o
0 0

«* e>4
O r-(
»-( en
CO CO
0' O
O 0
en 
r-l U i-l 4J *J 41 03 4-1 i-l 03 l-l O. 60 44 > 4)
U O — -r« W U 03 U 03 C ^ "O •*-< X C O 4J 03
H V4 -H 4J T3 dog (OQarS-Hh 0)0.0)1-1 05 O l-( 03 4J
0] O 03 i-H O -O i*-( 41 i-l r-l 3 a 03 MO) > 41 4J C. y C
O O> >, 03 03 1-1 0) i-l y 03 O W 3 i-IUCOO -rt E O 03
•H 0) £0)i-l rH ffl U -C O 4J -H 4) OJ 03 C H T3 4) iH r-l 4J
00 MO O*£ O. d T3 03 3 03 41 « 4-1 4) O.3OO. 3 M 3
O W 0) ^ O r-l 4J 03 8 1-" 41 U S 03 i-l S 44 3 O. *O iH
MO) TJ 4) 0)4) 433 CO 03 3)730) -H 4J i-l 01 03 0 C 
4W ^s *^3 ^ 00 S C O. r'H U4 CO T3 CJ a O. CO (Q r*4 ^W rH G
0) r-l Oj 41 C 4) i-l O t-( O 03 T3 C iHi-l 4-1 T3 O O •" O
HU OttO W *H 8 C 4J -r* 4) 44 3 C 03 -U 03 C C M -H Q'Ol-i
Oj 03 SOT > O 44 O.OIS a O 3 44 03 03 03 03 E 03 41 O O
a M 03 W W 44 r-l O 4) 41 0)^:0)0)009 -H O S 44 t3 4)44i-l£tM
v?4J S3 i-5 3 rHMi-l -TJUMajO. J=4-I33S T3OO*J
S O O CJ 41 CO 4) y 43 -H r-i 3 B3 E 3 Q. J= r-l ffl •HOIOIOIOI
OS 44 i-l 41 03 >U3 O.C80JQOO4) Offl r-l4J O.H-1 D, S 03






















CD
OQ
O 'O OIUUC 0) « 4) 41 O OS CO i-l C O to 41 U-i 03 (U. 44 OIOJQ ±, > y -rt can 3 a , o c — iH S cu -H -H 303000 s^^H
4J T3 44—1 i-| 41 T3 a; U 44 -a 41 J2 42 a «4 4) 3 a i-i TS 4) W i-l Tl^^H
S3 S rH O.r-1 «MS O. (0 C tO 44 i-l 60 0) > i-H O 0) C 03 44 03 3^HP
O 44 O a p. nj ^M O X *44 0) O 05 *H *H J4 03 0) a J4 O 3 O 03 «ri 4) 4>J ^^ja
o 03 cj> •< y 41 y w o «J u a 3 a o 3 c £ ao iJ o* u a c T: ta

o o o o o o o

u-
^
—
UJ

-------
a.
5
O
O
o
2
O
55

o
LU
cr
O






W K!
•H
< V-

• *
< 0
3£
sS



§
o •
- a
O uj
~ C»
^w w»










IT
i—
iH
<
a
AJ
y
01

<
_J
3
s

u
§
o
«M*
>
u.



eO
1
_i
tJJ
>
UJ
•J
rl
I
^
UJ

>
UJ
_l
•4
«4
Ul
>
U
.J
^
_J
Ul
>
Ul
_J
J
^
«J
u
>
Ul
_l
H
«J
UJ
Ul
_J
0)
f^
£ -»'
>§
u. a.
UJ
_ 1-
es tg
si
>s
U. UJ




•K
UJ
c
D
bo
<
UJ
s
^
UJ
_J
K
K
PLISHMENT
ACCOM

o
CM r-j « Oi-l t8f-l O liH-HW
fli- 0 OIC3-0 0 « 8 3 0
aj -u | aw wi-tcaai o AJ as o «-i 01 n-i
we at -u 3 3 ^3 S us y a) oo 4i
0)30 ow- yw aiin'a^S A -u 5 e J3
« 41 «w-o aoiysiiw 010 -rtua^So)
to o O tau> ,4Jaj aj^-ooi gw S a ca a
y*j oic fl -S f-f wo ai3fl.«wJ
OOiJOl « B 3 C waj euoajxo oOrf! jS^wwo-ri
W3«w otm-oa 3j iwoio-rt -ow w 3 o «
CO
j^ o w 41 coo'wa 013 j= w co -o w -H 3 ca wy c a
OO-rt -H 4J 5 ftrH .0 SrH « OOOfll COial-oS
OJJ J3
*JC3 rHWa) O 4->C O.-H •» T3OQ. WaGijai
aiog-o ftijwy 010. C-HCOI -So-n 5 S -S H
gyoi oi^c-Hiw AJX oo3«« -aoj Q.-OJ: « o « ao 3
0> C341600 34) y3OX^41 OlfitO 4I4JSCW-*
oioi>t» coyo y wxw •HCWM-HOS
ffl^SS §* a *S jj 'J? MS3t°S> g 5 t°a)  60*a
•H *J ^2 r-tcaycy >. a to 3-H.y -o OOJAJ *J.
-------
•







•


>
0
2
uu
O
^
9. §
UJ j§
** ss
gg
^M ^^
___f {J
<~
H
2 >
5 <
22
||
2 H
^ 2
UJ

^
U*
00
3
a.
^
0
U
o
H

3

2
O
^?
•••
U
LU
Q


007 3|
r«*
o
	 - - IL-

o
•H
< 0
||





§
0 .
O ui
~ 0!
















10
3
0
JJ
u
01
«-l

Cd

4J

— 0
LU 0)
as
o
Q a
— ^ ^»

u>





•t
•
i

I
<
L
i
a
L

H
f.
L
i

(
i
/
c
c
4

C

!
u>
J
_!
Ul
>
Ul
J
J
_i
Ul
^
Ul
-i
Ul

Ul
1
1
_1
Ul
Ul
-J
-J
Ul
Ul



_,-
O

^>
•3
^
E
2
j
^

a

t


















^
|

1








U 1
U i4
C *
at 01
w a.
9 X
r-t 0)

*o «
4J •
tt) -O
^J 144 Q}
*°g
C at o
O H >w
3 M
00 U 4>
*VJ «
C 01 41
01 A -H
a. j-> -a
01 9
•O "O *J
a a
01 CO ^
aj -n o fl
•a 01 . - V
•rt CO ^
CD -a w
iH 3 fl

u a g

I

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

      1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQORJ)       MEDIA:

 Air: Ecological Processes and Effects  (A120)       REG.         APPRO:
 B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

       The goal is to detect, understand and predict the  impact of air pollutant
   on terrestrial ecosystems (natural systems and agricultural crops). This
   includes the effects and fate of pollutants on the biotic and abiotic
   components, the related interactions on processes and  the potential impact
   on human health or welfare.  Research findings will relate air pollutant
   concentrations to damage potentials in the environment by assessing
   pollutant interactions and effects and bioaccumulation in terrestrial eco-
   systems and in food chains. Studies will encompass pollutant sources,
   emissions, air quality deterioration potential, and other discharges which
   alter environmental conditions and subsequently effect terrestrial systems.
   This information is used in criteria for management and control strategy
   development.

       The objectives are to characterize air pollution problems in the
   environment, to determine the dynamic processes and effects of these
   pollutants and to provide methods and techniques to measure or monitor these
   effects. Integral to these functions are the development of predictive
   models on the fate and effects of these pollutants verified through field
   studies. Research will also determine the acute and chronic effects of
   air pollutants, singly and combined, in various concentrations, upon indivi-
   dual_floxa,- fauna -and_soil-eco«y^teia--components^-The- resultant information
   will be used to (a)  develop a scientific basis for air pollution control
   strategies; (b) establish and strengthen secondary air quality standards
   and (c) establish a basis to evaluate the role of soils and vegetation in
   prevention of significant deterioration of air quality.  This research
   supports the "welfare effects" mandate of the Clean Air Act and Amendment
   Section 127(a)  as revised.

   C)  FT 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS            4  ,

   1)  Research studies,  culminating in 20 pending or published reports on
      air pollution effects on the environment have shown the detrimental
      impact on the environment.   This information is used to support criteria
      document,preparation and/or revision of secondary air quality standards.

   2)  Determined that biogenic emissions of hydrocarbons from indigenous
      vegetation contributes to background pollution loads.

   3)  Completed a  field  experimental pha'se of a study of photochemical oxidant
      impact on San Bernadino,  CA forests indicating the detrimental effects
      of urban pollutants.  Initiated final phase studies including data analysis,
      integration  and predictive  modeling as a basis for establishing control
      strategies.

   A)  Completed studies  on photochemical oxidant effects on agricultural crops
      and selected forest  species which indicated decreased  productivity
      potential  and quality alteration.  Proceeded with studies on NO  and SO,
      effects  to determine  their  impact  on ecosystem components.     X    -••••'
EPA Farm 2410-10 l3-73)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  ORD     MEDIA:  Air
  Air: Ecological Processes and Effects (A120).     REQ.       .  APPRO:
   •  5) Determined that pollutant interactions and pollutant combinations
        may cause deleterious effects-to biotic and abiotic components
        and processes at concentrations lover than those for single pollutants.

     •6) Provided 2000 hours of technical assistance to program offices,
        regional offices, state and local governments and other agencies
        relating to air pollution problems.

 I>) IT 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

     !)• Determine the impacts of criteria and selected non-criteria air
        pollutants on plant productivity, nutritional quality and on soil
        systems, including field testing techniques and evaluation of the
        ecological cost/effects cost/benefits. This research supports
        establishment of secondary air quality standards.

     2) Investigate regional ecological impact of photochemical oxidants in
        Southern California caused by urban'pollutants.

     3) Increase field study activities to assess air pollutant impact on
        agricultural/silvicultural crops; includes production and quality
       : evaluations.
 EPA Form 2410.10 (8-73)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2J  DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  ~ ™ * — ™ ™ ^ • W V • • • • W • • • • ^ •• • ^ V • Ml IB W •} • V • V * ^ •>• •* W W •> WJ • •* W ^ • • •> V V *i • • • ^ •••> •• • ••• •§ ••• • •
  ,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA; AIR
  120 ECOLOGICAL  PROCESSES & EFFECTS-AIR          APPRO* R i D

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY 8Q INCR    FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT          32.0          5.0           5,0           5.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          2.0          2.0           2.0           2.0
01  OF 06             FTE      .                 21.a           7,9           7.9
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000.0)     1,500.0     2,531.1      1,700.0      1,700.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Activities
    . Maintain laboratory and field assessments of acute and chronic, low
     level and long term exposure studies  of  the effects of ozone, sulfur
     dioxide and nitrogen oxides on the environment.

    . Conduct studies on pollutant interaction effects as related to agricultural
     crops and other associated processes.  Determine the impact on productivity
     food quality and economic implications.

    . Conduct studies on the effects of  hydrocarbons, heavy metals and halogen
     gases on flora, fauna and soil systems with emphasis on uptake,
     bioaccumulation and degradation.

    . Investigate the environmental factors  which influence the response of
     biological components exposed to air  pollutants.

    Impacts                                      .

    . The information from these studies will  aid in determining which pollutants
     are most detrimental and establish the concentrations at which effects may
     be detected. It will indicate the  biological components and processes
     which are most vulnerable and will  provide a basis for recommendations for
     control strategies and for secondary  air quality standards.

    . Funding this level of ecological research will provide information on
     environmental degradation caused by air  pollutants. Not funding this level
     of effort will cancel the Agency's research program on air pollution effect
     on the environment. Criteria for establishing and/or revising secondary
     standard's are necessary and must be updated 'periodically>therefore,it is
     essential to maintain both the scientific expertise and the research progran
     to meet these needs.
                                                                      OU7J
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2J DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDJAf
A120  ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES &  EFFECTS-AIR         APPRCj  R  & D

B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C. £.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         33.0          5.0                        5.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          2.0          2.0                        2.0
02  OF 06            FTE                      21,a                        7.9
    BUDGET AUTH, (000.05     1,500.0      2,531.1        340.0      2,0«0.0
  C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Activities

     .  Complete  regional air pollution  study in the San Bemadino-,  CA forests.

     .  Increase . photochemical oxidant  studies on selected flora,  fauna and
       supporting system.

     .  Improve field testing and monitoring  capabilities and develop and
       verify  predictive models of pollutant Impact. Increase studies of
       non-criteria pollutants.

   Impacts

      These studies will indicate the impact of anthropogenic/urban air
     pollutants  singly or in combinations upon the critical components of
     the environment.  Field studies will validate findings and coupled
     with predictive models will provide the assessment potential  for
     evaluating  impacts on a national basis.

      Funding  this level will allow completion of the eight year study of
     urban  pollutants in Southern California. The other studies will
     provide information which may be extrapolated to a national scope.
     Not funding will delay decisions on regional pollutant impacts and
     controls  on socio-economic consequences.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDIAj  AIR
A120  ECOLOGICAL  PROCESSES & EFFECTS-AIR         APPRO!  R &  D

B. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.  E.  FY  60  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         32.0          5.0                       5.0
 LEVEL              OPFT      -    2.0          2.0                       2.0
03 OF  06            FTE                       21.4                       7.9
   BUDGET AUTH.  COOO.O)     1,500.0     2,531.1        22b.O      2,266.0
  C  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL OMLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Activities      •   -  -         ''                                  .
                   •
    .  Conduct studies  on pollutant interactions,  synergistic reactions  and
      on environmental factors related to ecosystem response.

    .  Determine the extent of biogenic sources  as pollutant contributors,
      and study the effects of non-criteria pollutants  (halogen gases, heavy
      metals) on plants,  animals, microorganisms  and soils.

   Impact
    .  These studies will delineate how pollutants interact, the resultant
      impact and the processes effected. They will determine if pollutants
      predispose plants  to pathogens, and provide a basis for recommending
      controls or standards for non-criteria pollutants.

    .  Information from this research will aid in assimilating and  integrating
      data into predictive models. Not funding will jeopardize modeling efforts
      needed for management decisions and for control strategies.
                                                                   OU75
EPA Form 24JO-11 (8-78)

-------

9
CO
a

f*\

o ~
— a>
UJ
*-
z
*-
«5
u

ru (9
ec z
o •-•
— z
z
•«
Q.
*•*
>-
Z
UJ **
U  _J
z or -« 3
Ul Z
Z •- 3
C Z
IT 3
> Z »-
UJ *-t Ui
co o zr
CO ••* 0 UJ
UJ (^> c^ Sc
« 0 Z
*— *-t
KI
0
UJ Z.
•-a »-
^ O CO
z u. o- uj

Of CL
— • Z
3
*v
^ O'
•,
•-«




o o o o c o o-
G o o in tr r\i ^
0 -C « »O
f^ tf> — O'
«. •.
«• *•



o o o o o o &•
o o o i-n in ry r*.
o •* a- KI
h- lA — » O1
* *



— e> -* — o o ^
— r^ s (M in ru —
f*^ f\i O O- 
«fi ^- U. UJ
^> w _| *-* u. O- *-
0 < 0 CL O ik.
• t(j cr o •— ' »— »
u, X (I) 3 0
C ^ 3 I •" ••
3 O < ^- CC
— • <: x tt z
c *• to o
h- Z X >- •—
_J UJ «IU < >-
uj 15 ^ ^^ ^ *~<
> O t- tr.
UJ 3 3 C
_J CE O CL
0 0
o ru
a ru
o —
ru —
o o
o ru
d ru
o — •
ri* —



o o
• •
o ru
9 ru
o —
^ «
ru —

0 0
o ru
a ru
o —
« «
ru —




o c o » c o t>
o ru to ru in ru r-
3 ^) r- ru
o in 3 —
« » ^
ru — —



o o o o
o ru to r-
9 K1 0
**t ro *^




— o — -«o o a
— r- sr ru ir> ru -<
K> ru c o" AI
in oin KI
^ * •> «
ru •- — —


o o o o o -o
o — o- in ru ru
e ru >- ru KI
in o 3- -
*> >- U. UJ
•C •- _l^ b- CL l-
o « o a o u.
. iu or o ^ «-
u. z to 3 c
O •- 3 I •» —
3 O < «- «
ru « x (r z
o •- uj o
i- Z X >- —•
_| uj "• UJ < t-
UJ C3 *^ ^^ i »«4
> o t- to
Ul 3 3 O
_i tr co.
O Ki
* -C
-c a
ru ru
ru —
O - -K4
•C -O
<£ 9
ru ru
ru —



O Kt
• •
•O -D
•O 3
ru ru
* «
«M —

O Kt
•C •£
-C a
ru ru
m »
ru —




o o OKI c o »
« KI KI  ru r>
•C ^ O 9
ru in r- ru
* ^ ^
ru — —



o o e KI
•c -* in a
ru ru ru
ru ru —




— . 0 — — O 0 3
— »~ s» ru m ru —
KI ru o t> ru
in o in KI
» » « ^
ru — — —


o o o o o o
o — o- in ru ru
o ru«-- ru KI
in o 9 to
** «-»



e
o
o *-
•A H- u. UJ
« " _l»^ U. 0. •-
0 « 0 CL C U.
• UJ cr c ^ w>
u. I to 3 c
O •- 3 X •» —
3 O < «^ 05
KI < I £- Z
c t- co o
t- z x >- >—
_J UJ •- UJ < »-
UJ t5 -^ •-' _J •—
> c t- to
uj r. 3 o
_J IE CO.

-------
 u

 UJ
 o
 <
 z
 o

 u
 UJ
 H-
 o
.CC-
 a.
 UJ
00

M
I-
z
UJ
    O
    U
    u
    o

    c/i

    O
    UJ
    G
    -cc
    o
    u.


•41
ac
(4

< O
o ?
oi £
S<




o
1C3
O 01
X CC








^^
0
CN
<

03

U
0)
U-l
U-l
•a
c
a
00
TITLE (AND CODE)
logical Procesae
t=8
2W
O
z ••
Ol-
*~*H
52<
u
Ol
O

<



V)
1U
X

J
O
U
u
H
3

•^

§
O
-



I
_j
01
01
j
Ol
01


j
Ol
^
or
H
UJ
01
_j

J
'
01
Ol
_J
-j
Ol
01
O)
p«
*" O
> CC
o. a.

01
CO  S
^ ^
^ C/3
Ik ^^



01,
NT TITLE &MEASUR
tt
Ol
S
X
V]
3
a.
S
o
u
u
<

03


•









<*i «s o «n O cs H





«M CM O es a ,-t ^
-
£ie(ni*0o. BOOB
0)1 3C « O ^C ffl '"B MfflOOSO
008) CMC -HlJ t5 4) CQO*a4-l C CO 2 3) Si
NB ^i KO totoajotnucna) >o M-IQO
^W 41 •H'C Cu US CO WO USJCUO
OJ-HW 0) 4) Oaj S) CU  ** T
S ^J tj S -H O O fH UJ ' >s T1 C MC S <_S pi t_. ^^ ^ ^ t
3 *O U 3 S U U CQ QJ Q rn O CO O S Q^ *_j fm. ij *j T^
S z w a U'S z *a.4-i^-
-------
  • *'                • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  ORD     MEDIA:   Air

   Transoort and Fate (A125)         	REG.        APPRO:  R&D
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The major  objective of this .decision unit  is  to provide information  on
  the transport and fate  of gaseous  and particulate  air pollutants  through  the
  following  activities:   (a) determine mechanisms and rate  constants  of  forma-
 tions and removal processes of pollutants  in the ambient air; (b)  determine
  the contribution of sources (man-made and natural) to ambient pollutant levels;
  (c) develop  air quality simulation models (AQSM) for predicting pollutant
  concentrations  from sources for a  variety of temporal and spatial scales;  (d)
  determine  atmospheric effects of pollutant on visibility  reduction  and local
  weather; and (e) provide meteorological support to other  EPA programs.
      The  information obtained  from  this  research program will be necessary
 to develop  and/or evaluate control  abatement strategies for air pollutions
 sources.

  CJ  FY 73 ACCOMPLISHMENTS   .,  -,  .   ,.u         u-t    -tj-t     e   i*
     o Smog cnamoer studies simulating the atmospheric oxidations  of sulfur
       dioxide suggested the control of  sulfur dioxide emissions will be more
       effective than control  of oxidant precursors.
     o For  selected areas in the U.S., it  was determined that visibility
       reductions were associated with periods of increased sulfate  burdens.
     o A  predictive method referred to as  the isopleth method has  been  developed
       for  predicting photochemical oxidant concentrations associated with
       given  hydrocarbon and nitrogen dioxide levels.
     o An AQSM has been  developed to assess and  predict ambient roadway
   -  ...-.pollutant, _C5ncsatTations_£esulting  from, motor vehicle emissions.
     o Analysis  of halocarbon  data  has indicated that the  tropospheric
       concentrations of OH radicals may be higher  by a factor of  five  than
       currently estimated and would suggest that certain  halocarbons may  have
       longer tropospheric lifetimes then  previously calculated.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       The FY  79  program  will continue to support research  on determining the
  transport, transformation and removal processes of regulated and  important
  nonregulated pollutants with  major emphasis on  pollutants such as  oxidants,
  sulfates,  halocarbons, selected organics,  and nitrates.
       Conduct major urban field studies  in Houston  (second year) and Denver
  (first year) on oxidants and  aerosols.  *
       The research on AQSM development will be focused on  the large  scale  (e.g.,
  1000-2000km) and small  scale  (e.g., highway models).
       In  1979, the Sulfur Transport and  Transformation in  the Environment  (STATE
  program  will be in its  second .year of funding and  will constitute the  major
  field measurement program on  the long-range atmospheric transport and  trans-
  formation  of sulfates and nitrates.
       The research on photochemical oxidants will address  major uncertainties
  associated with the long-range transport  of ozone  hydrocarbons and  oxides of
  nitrogen emphasizing contributions to ozone and the role of  nitrogen oxides in
  the formation of photochemical oxidants.
       Develop models to  assess visibility  impairment associated with fine
  particulates which will attempt to quantify the relative  contributions of the
  major pollution sources to visibility reduction in various regions  of  the U.S.
      OUT'J
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

     IRM 2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
* »
Al
DECI
25 TR
SION UNI
ANSPORT
T
&
TITLE
FATE-A
AND
IR
CODE
HQ
MEDIA
APPRO
:
t
AIR
R &
D
    B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY  80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
             POSITIONS  PFT          38.0         44.0          33.0         33.0
     LEVEL              QPFT           6.0          6.0           a.O           4,0
    01  OF 04             FTE                       52.6          44.2         44.2
       BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)    10,500.0     11,010.0       8,257.5      8,257.5
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Activities
        o   Secondary Organies;  Continue chemistry of formation, product determ-
          •  ination, and lifetime.
        o   Atmospheric Sulfates;  Continue field  studies  on long-range transport
            and transformation  (e.g., STATE); laboratory chemistry studies on
            formation and  removal; this program will be implemented as described
            in the  Culver  committee pilot on respirable particles currently under
            development.
        o   Aerosols;  Studies  on formation, growth, and removal of airborne fine
            and coarse particulate matter with emphasis on IPM  (inhaled particulate
            matter.
        o   Oxidant;  Field studies on long-range  oxidant  transport, rural oxidant
            chemistry, oxidant/NOx/HC relationships; multiple day smog chamber
            irradiations,  role  of aromatic chemistry on oxidant production.
       - o   Air -Quality Simulations Models (AQSMH  Continue -development of
            regional scale models for sulfates and ozone;  development and testing
            of new roadway model for UNAMAP.

     Impact
        o   Funding this level will provide a distribution of evaluated air quality
            models for secondary pollutants for local to regional scales, and for
            reactive plumes, where predictions of  oxidants, sulfate, nitrogen -
            containing compounds and aerosols are  the primary objects of investiga-
            tion.  In addition, work at this level will provide descriptions of the
            physical processes of deposition,  aerosol formation and secondary
            product formation for non-criteria substances.
        o   Not funding this level will terminate  validation of urban oxidant models
            using St. Louis data, and any regional model development.  It will also
            terminate any work  on dry and wet depositions  processes, aerosol
            (including IPM and sulfates).   The" oxidant related research is important
            for supporting the state implementation planning process,••'while the
            work on sulfates will be used to. support future regulating programs
            atmospheric sulfates.
4
JU73
   EPA Form 2470-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2!  DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'^^•^••^••••^••••••••••^•^•^•••••••^^^••^^••^•• — •-•—. 	 — .	— • _	, 	 .	
-^ — ^ •——• — ^ ^ •"• ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ — ^ -w -v ^ w « w ^ « w w ^ w w ^ w ^| WWVWW^VtWW W W W «P IB V ^ V *• W •• ™ ^ " * «• •• •* W • *> *• *P • •
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ       MEDIA:  AIR
A125 TRANSPORT &  FATE-AIR                         APPRO:  R & D
» W • W  ^ W W  • ^ ^ • ^ W ^ ^ OT ^ • ••VVWWOTVVVWMVV" W •• • *• V i* VMM **^ <• €P • m ** W *• • *• " * * ^ <• 9 •• •• •• • • • •> •
B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 7
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

   RM 2\  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

 A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA:  AIR
 A125 TRANSPORT  & FATE-AIR                         APPROt  R &  D
 " V *0 • 0* *• 40 •• 40 40 • 4> 00 40 40 40 4V 40 40 4V W 4p 40 <•> 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 Wt 9 4k w 00 • V 40 40 40 H 40 004040400B400MM • • M M40 • W Ml • • M M •§ • • M •
 B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79 C. E.  FY  80  INCR   FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT          38,o         4«.o          a,o        44,0
  LEVEL              OPFT        '   6.0          6.0          1.0          6.0
 03  OF 04            FTE                       52.6          3.5        52.6
    BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)    10,500.0     11,010.0      1,101.0    11,010.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

 Activities

    o  Meteorological Support;  Met.  support to  OAQPS via EPA/NOAA - IAG
    o  Urban Field Study in Denver;  Conduct the second year of a field study
       on aerosol and oxidant chemistry  in the Denver atmosphere.
    o  Regional Oxidant Models;  Exercise regional model for Northeastern part
       of the U.S. to help support the 1982 SIP  revisions for oxidants.
    o  Complex Terrain;  Continue development of complex terrain model.
       Collect and collate field data for evaluating complex terrain models.
    °  Visibility;  Continue to collect  and analyze field data on usability
       to determine the main meterological and pollutant parameters affecting
       visibility reduction; extend current visibility trend analyses using
       historical data.              ;       " '
 Impact
    o  Funding this level will maintain the meteorological support to OAQPS.
       It will also provide a set of  oxidant isopleths for the northeast during
       unfavorable weather conditions which would give rough estimates of
       the impacts that various major urban.areas would have upon one*;another
       in the development of their several and separate oxidant control
       strategies.
    o  Not funding this level would eliminate the support for the meteorologists
       assigned to OAQPS covered by the 6KD-NOAA interagency agreement and,
       therefore, would adversely impact the Agency's regulatory program in
       developing and supporting effective air pollution control strategies.
       Elimination of the regional oxidant modeling exercise will hinder the
       Agency's effectiveness in dealing with the 1982 SIP revisions for oxidants
       It is anticipated that the visibility research program will provide
       important scientific information which will be used in future standard
       setting processes for fine particulate aerosols.
                                                                    UUll
EPA Fprm 2410-11 (8-78)

-------


















o
z
cs
<[
^
z cr
o <
»-! I
ft- I
U CO
o a)
cc u
3
_JJ O
« to
ft- UJ
Z Ct
r •-
Z •-!
O Z
tr 3
> Z
z o
UJ •-<
to
CO OH
bJ U
ft- UJ
•< c
CO —
o
UJ I
ft- ce
« o
Z U-
3







ft—
z
UJ
z a
a. •-«
O «5
_) 1
> ft-
UJ «
o u.

•a *f
^ ft*-

cc o
« a
UJ to
to z
UJ <
or cc
ft—
nr ^ 9 <
U U 1.. £ < U1
ru
•o ••
ru •<

3
CO
o-


cr
o- •*
— to
fr-
<
ft*-t
ft-
CO

mo
CO Z
o- —
— z
<
a


cc
cr
V*





iu
«
cc -a
O _>
— 3
5
U


ft-
z
UJ
o z
CC UJ
tr cc
«-• LJ
Z



^
10
O- UJ
r>-
o- cc
— a:

_j
r- 3
o- «—
— LJ*

























m 
to Kl
in ^
^ in
in co
ru «
cc •*}

m «

»- in
in cc
ru M
eo ^


in «
r- in
m cc
ru «
« «
CO K)



in c£> r^ ^ o o ru
r- 9 ruin fi 9 9
ru 9 r» «
« * » «
CO — ^ Kl




m co ^ « e o ru
ft^ 9 ru in **> 9 9
in <& t> cc KI 9
ru 9 r* KI
« « « ^
v ^* ^ fi




0 — O- — O O «
o 9 in 9 9 «o ru
— K> r* — ^ m
o o o in
* » ^ *
— — 0- 9
O O O O O O
o o c in co -o
o co rx c m
in •* M K*
o ru cc 9
«M






«^
0
C
o »-
w ft- b. uj
O < O £L O U.
• uj cr o »•» »-
u. I to r- o
o «- 3 r. f> —
r o < <- to
— < r er z
o ft- tn o
ft- Z »C >- i—
_) UJ — UJ •« ft-
UJ O •w ^- _l —
> o ft- eo
kU 3 3 O
_J CC 00.
o r-
o- ru
0 -O
a o
O- 9
c r-
&• ru
0 O
o- o
O- 9

O »-
• •
O ru
c ~a
0 0
<> 9


o r-
c- ru
o -c
e- o
» «
e> 9



o cc ru f- o o *-
o- c CD ru o in o
o- r- -• o
« ^ » ^
O « CD 9




in o in ** o o cr
— -o in r- f>- — 9
in r*- r* f*
^ nt *** ^
m, te
VM ^rt




O — Cf ^" O O •«
o 9 in 9 9 *A ru
— KI r* -* 9 in
o cr o in
» ^ * *
— — 0- 9
O O 9 O O -O
o o o in co *
c cc ru o Kt
in — K) KI
o ru cc 9
4M






r^
O
O
O ft-
W ft- U- UJ
9 ^* 1 ^% ll fl ^B
O «t O CL O U-
• UJ Z O »-• ~
b. I to 3 C

3 C < •- »
f\J • >-i
_l UJ — UJ < ft-
UJ CS •" «-• _J •-«
> c ft- to
UJ 3 3 O
_i ec co.
0 —
O 9
••• V*
o in
•• 9
C «•
0 9
•-> *«
o m
— 9

c *•
• •
0 9
«t *«
o in
— 9


O —
e> 9
•« «•
o in
» ^
•• 9
—


o — o •* o o ^
o 9 in 9 9 * ru
•• fi ^^ «^ 9 m
o o o in
^ » » «
— •- cr 9




OKV >-. 9 O O V)
-" K> f» — . 9 — Kl
o cr o in
••»• er 9
«
«M




0 — 0> — 0 0 «
o 9 in 9 9 « ru
— K> r- ~ 9 in
o cr o in
* ^ ^ «
•• •• cr 9
o o o o o o
o o o in cc -c
o co ru o KI
in -> 10 KI
oru co 9
**






*>
0
o
0 ft-
•• ft- u. bJ
c < o a o u.

U. I tO 3 0
C! — 3 I «•» ~
3 C < <- to
Kl < X CC Z
0 ft- to O
•-z x >- «
_1 UJ — UJ •< ft-
> C ft- to
UJ 3 3 O
-I CC 00.

-------
O
z
LU
O
x>
LU
 CC
 o.
2
LU
>

2
LU
   2
   LU

   S
   r
   CO
ACCO
DECISION UN
   •
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
    AIR QUALITY - INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES (A-128)
HQ  ORD

REG.
MEDIA:  AIR

APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
      The air  quality industrial processes  program is  a principally
 extramural effort  responsive  to legislative mandates  of  the  Clean Air
 Act.   The overall  objective  is to  develop  and  demonstrate  pollution -control
 technologies  capable of  reducing or  eliminating  potentially'  hazardous  and
 toxic pollutant emissions  from industrial  point  sources.   Program outputs
 provide  technical  and  cost data which support  regulatory standards development
 and  provide industry with  environmental  control  options.

      Emissions  under study include those from  the following  industries:  chem-
 ical processing, agrichemicals (fertilizers and  pesticides),  textiles, pulp
 and  paper,  food and  miscellaneous  products, metal fabrication and finishing,
 metal and mineral  production, petroleum  refining and  storage segments; as well
 as those resulting from  hazardous  materials spills.

 C)   FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      In  1978,. the  program  focused  on assessing the nature  and quantity of
 toxic and other hazardous  pollutants emitted from industrial sources.  This
 information,  together  with data on the ability to control  these pollutants,
 provide  the basis  for  future  regulatory  actions.   In  addition, several develop'
 ment and demonstration projects on criteria pollutants control were continued
 as well  as efforts to  transfer demonstrated foreign technology for particulate
 control  in corresponding local industrial  sources.

      Major accomplishments include:

      -  Demonstrations of  flue gas desulfurization in the  nonfernous industry.
      -  Demonstration  of the  use of  low  volatility solvent coatings for  can
         and appliance  coatings.
      -  Technology development and pilot demonstration for dry cleaning
         establishments,  tank  truck/rail  car cleaning, and  solvent reclaiming
         operations.
      -  Demonstration  of reduction of total sulfur emissions through lime mud
         oxidation  and  in-plant control in  the  pulp and paper industry.
      -  Development  and  verification of  emission prediction  model for  chemical
         processing industry.  "

 D)   FY 79 PROGRAM  DESCRIPTION

      The primary objectives  to be  accomplished will be:  (1)  to define and
 provide  solutions  to a few critical  emission sources  known to have detrimental
 effects  on human health  and  the environment, such as  those encountered in
 pesticide manufacturing, and  from  nonferrous smelting;  (2) to accelerate
 acceptance and  implementation of technological advances  by absorbing the risk
             v
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
-QRM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVEKVIbW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
   AIR QUALITY - INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES CA-128)
HQ  ORD
REG.
MEDIA: AIR

APPRO:
of demonstrating  fugitive  emissions  control in steel and glass manufacturing;
and•(3) maintain  a  current awareness of  international technological develop-
ments—processing arid  control—across 19 major industrial sectors.   Specifi-
cally  the program will:

     - Assess  and  monitor four pesticide (atrazine, trifluralin,   alachlor,
carbaryl),  four" petrochemical (benzene,  methylethyketone,  methylisobu-
tylketone ethylene  oxide),  and four  organic chemical (vinylidene chloride,
styrene, nitrobenzene, halomethanes)  manufacturing operations,

     - Demonstrate lime/limestone scrubbing for smelting or sulfur bearing
nonferrous  ores.
                    • t
     - Characterize volatile emissions  CAs, Pb, Cd) and their control from
copper, lead, and zinc smelters.

     - Demonstrate technology control of fugitive emissions—iron  and steel .

     - Demonstrate one coating process  alternative to reduce organic dis-
charges from automobile manufacturing operations*.

     - Complete  source assessment work  on toxic air emissions for  the textile
industry and implement bench  scale activity for hydrocarbon removal.

     -r. ' Demons-trate -techno 1 ogy. fox-cantroi-of-harardous-particulaies from
   ss  industry  furnaces.

     '- Continue  characterization of  petroleum refinery emissions.

     - Develop an  approach for evaluating the cost and capabilities of alter-
natives for controlling hydrocarbon  emissions from solvent use,  cleaning
operations, and other related uses.

                              ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

1.  Three options were considered for implementing the proposed RD&D programs:
     (a)  100% in-house, (b) 100% extramural, or (c)  a mixture of in-house and
    extramural.   Options Ca)  and  (c)  were rejected because of inadequate
    manpower resulting from personnel ceilings and inadequate in-house
    laboratory  and  plant facilities.   Consequently,  the only viable option
    is a 100% extramural program.
2.  Concentrate R&D  on metal  and chemical industries only - rejected since
    Agency  requirements mandate the maintenance of professional expertise
    across  all  19 major industrial sectors.

3.  Implementation  of pilot activities with in-house personnel - rejected
    because time  constraints  result  in manpower intensive requirements and, .v, .-
    no personnel  increases  accompany  resources requested.                 JUCJ
    ocm 2410-10 (8-73)

-------
:ORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ   ORD     MEDIA: AIR
   AIR-QUALITY -- INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES (A-128)       REG>         APPRO:
 4.  Let  industry  conduct  its  own research - rejected since there would be
     no incentive  available  for desiring to assume developmental risks of
     making  generally  confidential and/or patentable information availa-
     ble  to  the Agency for regulatory use.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

       M 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
      'DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAI  AIR
   Ai28 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES-AIR                     APPROJ  R & o

   B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C. E,   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
             POSITIONS  PFT         27.0         20.0          is.o         is.o
     LEVEL              OPFT         .2.0          5.0           4.0          4.0
   01  OF 06             FTE                       50.6          23.2         23.2
       BUDGET  AUTH. (000.0)     5,000.0      4,500.0      3,375.0      3,375.0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. 'DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.                     '••


   Activities            -                • •               •                   • '
   i
4
    To achieve currently  unmet Ambient Air Quality Standards for oxidants,  State
    Implementation Plans  (SIP's) will need to be revised.  Before the Agency
    can fully assist in the  development and evaluation of these new SIP's how-
    ever critical information gaps in current emissions inventories must be .
    filled.   To satisfy this requirement, an industrial air emissions character-
    ization program will  be  undertaken in high priority areas as follows:

1.  Point-source emissions from approximately 8 Volatile Organic Chemical
    (VOC) storage and handling sites will be characterized to determine
    their contribution total VOC emissions rates.  Specific chemical
    compound identification  will be included.  Test sites will be selected
    to enable- a nationwide estimate of all storage and handling emission
    to be made.
2.  A cost-benefit-risk model will be developed with supporting emissions
    data for use in decision making on the advisability of regulating
    various  sources of emission of potential' carcinogens as well as-other
    chemicals from coke making operations.

The Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) estimates that of
the 100 New Source Performance Standards planned for promulgation during
the next four years,  at least 25 will have inadequate Best Available Control
Technology (BACT).   High  priority control technology development and testing
programs will therefore be undertaken as follows:

1.  Control  Technology development programs will be initiated for four.(A)
    critical industrial source categories which will be identified by OAQPS
    as having inadequate  BACT.
2.  Performance evaluations  of retrofit pilot-scale collection technologies
    such as  carbon adsorption and catalytic incineration will be conducted
    at coil, web, and sheet  coating facilities, textile finishing facilities
    paint bake ovens,  and selected petrochemical sites.
3.  Technologies will be  developed and refined to control emission with
    emphasis on potential carcinogens from coke manufacturing processes.
    The technologies for  control of emissions from solvent and gasoline
    loading  operations for barges and rail cars will be developed and tested.
    Improved,  solventless coating technologies for furniture manufacturing
    will be  evaluated for inertness and product acceptability.
                                                                      JUt7

-------
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
    AIR QUALITY  -  INDUSTRIAL  PROCESSES CA-128)
                          HQ ORD
                          REG.
MEDIA-AIR

APPRO:
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
     FY 73 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY SO INCR.
                                                                        FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL
               POSITIONS
                             PFT
OPFT
                             FTE
              BUDGET AUTH. (000.0!
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. 'DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.                      t

 Level 1 continued-
 Impact
      If this activity is not funded States will .find' themselves at a severe
      disadvantage as they attempt to revise SIP's due to a lack of critical
      information.  The States themselves do not have sufficient research  and
      development funds to undertake this work on their own.  It is doubtful
      that the OAQPS or any other Federal organization have the resources  to
      fill this information gap 'in a timely manner.  Hence, a further unaccep-
      table delay in SIP preparation is nearly certain to result.
                                       •t          .
      The lack of Best Available Control Technology for critical industrial .
      source categories, which would continue is this activity is not funded,
      would delay the promulgation and enforcement of meaningful NSPS and
     -would--j-aopardize -the-Ag-eocy-'-s--schedule _that_is~ mandated .by_the Clean
      Air Act.
          0013
EPA Form 2410.] | (8.78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
    DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAt  AIR
    s INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES-AIR                     APPRO*  RID

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY^o'lNCR*™Y*8o"cUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         27.0         20.0           3.0          18.0
  t-EVEL              OPpT          2.0          5.0           i.O          s!o
02  OF 06             FTE                       30t6           2|9          £*\
    BUDGET  AUTH. (000.0)     5,000.0      a,500,0        675.0      4,050.0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. 'DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     .OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Activities
      1.. Data will be generated to determine the cost-effectiveness of various
 maintenance options as an approach to controlling fugitive VOC emissions from
 refining, petrochemical and organic chemical facilities.
      2.  Further quantification of VOC emission rates will be completed to
 identify the incremental addition of bxidant-producing  chemicals from aeration
 systems at industrial wastewater treatment plants.
      3.- Sophisticated instrumentation systems to maximize exhaust solvent
 concentrations from curing ovens, paint application booths, and other solvent
 use  industries to approach the lower explosion limit will be designed and
 axperimentally tested.
      4.  Guidelines will be developed,'tested and published to be used by the
  ffice of Enforcement in their monitoring program for control strategy of
   itive's VOC emissions.

   act
     Attainment of oxidant NAAQS has not been achieved.  Funding of this incre-
 nent will provide substantive information on the major fugitive sources of oxi-
 lant precursors so that effective control strategies can be developed.

     Treatment of solvent emissions at  coating facilities is currently uneconom-
 ical because safety regulations mandate that excessive dilution air be used to
 eliminate possible explosions.   This increment will design and test instrumen-
 :ation systems which maximize solvent concentrations (close to lower explosion
 Limits) in fume collection systems.   Available treatment equipment can then
   economically operated.

     Not funding this increment will yield one of two scenarios.   If the sources
 >f fugitive emissions contributing to protracted NAAQS violations cannot be
 quantified, control technology  will  either not be implemented or it will be
 -nforced on all fugitive sources across the  board.  If this priorization
 cheme (for all urban fugitive  sources)  and  the control systems development
 for coating facilities) is not supported, is  it doubtful that a  useful
 ontrol option for fugitive emissions will be  available.
                                                                    JiO
EPA Form 2410-1 1 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
 FORM  2s  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
 A. DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HO       MEDIAi AIR
 Alas  INDUSTRIAL  PROCESSES-AIR                    APPROJ R &  D
 •..——••—•«...»•........».....„..„..»,„»..„....,.,.,... •..»«•«..
 8, RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT  FY 79 C.  E.  FY  80 INC*    FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT         37.0          20.0          2,0         20.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          2.0           5.0                        5.0
 03 OF  06            FTE          -             30.6          1,0         27. t
    BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     5,000.0      4,500.0        «50.0      4, 500.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. 'DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.             •        :
 Activities
     This level will provide support to the OffiTce of Air, Noise and
 Radiation (OANR) by providing data required in the revision  and development
 of New Source Performance Standards and Control Technique Guideline
 documents for organic chemical processes.  The OANR is required to list
 by August 1978, all major source, catagories for which NSPS have not been
 set, and promulgate standards for these source categories by August,
 1982.  The Agency must identify minimum.acceptable national  BACT and
 "provide uniform guidance on alternative control technologies.  Activity
 'at this level will be directed towards the remaining categories of NSPS
 that were not supported by work performed under levels 1 and 2.  It -is
 anticipated that a priority list of NSPS categories and control technology
 deficiencies will be supplied by OANR and engineering information such as
 design manuals, filed testing,  Best Practices Manual will be developed in
 support of Agency NSPS activity.

     In addition, a quick response, on-site technical support capability  .
 will be provided to the Regional Offices to assist in evaluating new
 source permit applications.   Regional engineering assistance during
 review of new source permit applications will include thirty sources.

 IMPACTS
     Funding this level will,  in conjunction with OANR activities, enable
 the Agency to meet the-CAA mandate that NSPS-be promulgated for all major
 source categories by 1982.

     Failure to undertake this work will impact associated BACT guidance,
 and will adversely affect State and Regional Office resources.  Further-
 more, failure to fund this level will increase the likelihood of wide
 State-to-State inconsistencies in BACT determinations.
EPA Form 24 io.11 (S-78)

-------




















u
z
Ul
o
•c

z tr
0 «
p- r
•- i.
UJ CO
O UJ
c u
CX- tt
_> 0
< CO
^— UJ
z tr
UJ
z •->
o z
tr o
> z
z o
UJ —
CO
to i—
UJ U
H- UJ
•« c
CO —
c.
UJ ^
t- tr
••^ o
z u.








Or
i- i-.
UJ I
z to
Ok UJ
o to
_i to
UJ UJ
>• o
uj o
o a
a
"* _>
0 •-«
rr tr
< ^
UJ to
« n
ui o
or z
*-*
^
< CD
rv
•O »*
(X <


c



fO
CO
a- ^
-« CO
¥
X.
»-H
H-
cc

ru o
flC Z
a- •-»
— z
Z

a


-
cr w
f^
^ a
*- or
z:
(_>

CO <
r^- z;
o- ^~
— ^ o
<

























0 Kl
in -c

K) 0
Kl —
O f*
feT -4)
r- 9
t^ 0
Kt —


O Kl
« A
IT* ^
r»- ci
Kt 0
%. *
K» -*


O KJ
^ ^T
t*. ^
Kt O
* ^
Kl »*



o o c. K* o o ru
U^ ^ O" -C iO 9 K>
r^ -* tf* si -* ru
Kt CD m 0
Kl f\J —




c o o *+i o o rv
r- »- in S3 — *xi
Kl (C If* O
» *. *
Kl t\i ~*



O O O O O O O
o ao nj u% o in o
O O O" O' IM K>
y-i «• K) K)
» » % »
a ^ K> —
0 O C 0 C 0
o rv K c r^ ru
O K>  m
» «. »
in ^ ^







.^^
o
c
« >- U. LJ
O < O IL O U.
• uj a: c ^ <**
b. I «O Z) O
O *~ O t *ft ••
I? O < •-* CC
— < x a ^
o »- to o
•- z x >- «
—J UJ — UJ •<. *—
111 (J5 %^ ^^ _| t-4
> O ^- tn
U> ^ ^ (j
-ice o o.
0 -O
e in
in in
o ru
SI —
0 *
o in
in in
c ru
a «


o ^
• •
o in
in in
o ru
« «
a x


0 JJ
o in
in in
o ru
» ^
^ »•



O 0 0 -C O C —
c ru cc in cc in ^
in o in in -^ ru
o cr c ru
— Kl —




C O O Kl O O O-
in -ft o o KI — • ru
r* r-- o o
•o —• a ru





c o o o o o -o
c CD ru in e> in o
o o a- o- ru KI
in -* KI KI
* ^ » ^
a — KI —
o o o o o o
o ru co o r^ ru
o KI -o in ru
o cc — in
^ Bk ^
in a —







^^
c
o
<« 1- U. UJ
c « o o. e u.
• Ul IT O -^ w
U. I tC O O
o «- => r •» —
n o « «- «o
ru •< x a z
o »— to c
>- Z X >- w
— I UJ « UJ < >—
uj ca « -^ _i i—
> o t- to
UJ => O O
_i m o a.

C IP
c o-
in KI
51 «•«
C *•
o in
o o-
in KI
a -


o —
• •
o in
0 0-
in KI
«> »
sr —


o —
o in
0 O-
m KI
«. •.
a- —



o o o ** o o «-»
o ru CD in o in f-
o -^ co o ru ru
in — KI KI
ST — Kl —




o o o in o o
o o o o- ru —
in ru KI KI
a *• KI •*





e o o o c o -c
o co ru in o in o
o o o> t> ru KI
in — KI KI
•* •& » •>
a •• KI —
o o o o o o
o ru CD o r^ ru
o KI -49 in ru
o CD «~ in
•> •> •>
in a —







r*
o
0
if, »- u> UJ
*O *^ ^J ^* U> GL ^"
c < o a o u.
• ui tr c w ~
u. i to s o
o >- => r <« —
Z) O « '-' to
KI < x tr z
o *— to o
«- Z X >- •->
_j UJ « UJ < t—

> Cl (-CO
UJ => => C
_i ec o a
 I
Kl

 I
O-
C

-------
 5
 J


 3



 j

 f


 2 >

 U C

 2 <

 25
T CO

2S
  01
  5
  I
  UJ
  O
  O
  o
  g
  to

  o
  ui
  D
 'CC
 O
 u.


aid
M vS
"
H
t-l
T
5
J3
ezr
Pd
S
Ul
Q
O
U
a
z
<
Ul
_j
K
H
H
Z
A DECISION




Crt
r-
z
Ul
2
(/>
3
a.
S
O
U
o
<
>
5
<
_!
3

3
o
C3
O)
f
>
U.









•I
-i
UJ
>
Ul
u
•^
1
J
Ul
>
Ul
_J
J
"^
_l
Ul
>
Ul
_J
4
_l
Ul
>
Ul
_J
H
_l
Ul
>
Ul
_l
A
_l
Ul
>
Ul
_l


O>
r«
o •
23
> CC
u. a.


Ul
L.»
oo 5
f* S
2 1
> s
u. ui

ASURE
Ul
S
=3
Ul
_l
H
H
1—
Z
Ul
S
1C
to
B ACCOMPL

	
'










fl
co
* o o m «n «r o
cs a\
O

j
fi
ao
>r O O u"> en »» t-i
CM . O
» cn
, O












» 1 0
T3 1 jj ^
3 iH OJ —i 1 H ij
UWiSMO *JOO-rte
u u ai jj -H jj u u 3 ra a
 oo?a ejrvj OJJ-H w*oa iwiHft cu
y«J u-iu ca ows >IHU-I weuo ca,M «>> go
•w -H E • « e -H *J covjcn otiiJ 001-1 a)-(3i3 D.OO 4-i «<1J )j X ,M
aooioi-iaj e IU uajwiow
am>>w UCM-IT-I j«S«c OAJTJ « 1-1 01^0 o IH
ueo-HTtooi-i yc co-JJ-oiH atg u
o 4)u O3i-i o IH o «ij C U-IOO-H oa)
oc otntow o -HU o w-o oo a> oo> i-ic
o "n  f-i oj j-i a
wi 1-1 a w j-icuu- ui-icoy u-HCi-i uooo viow ttjja
U 05 CO CB (DO 3W 0)O3i-l (UCi-ID, fl)C CX 3 U o U 3O-HH! 34»cn OO
3«oy ayvMG.-w zwcucs soya aojw^a swz cjy














































CO
r^
CO
«N
0
'^
CX
I
5
u.
•<
0.
LU

-------


i
~































1

^
§
00
?"
f^"
2
JJ-
z
to
_j
Q_
«^
5
O
o
u
—\
CO
CM
1-1
CS
OT
U
CO
oo
Cd
O
0
£
H
a
z
M
1
>J
l-l
^
o-

t-4


01
a
0
cj


^
LU
h;
K-
^—
2
2
g
<2
o
LU
^
F



z
LU
5
I

2
0.
5
0
U
u

<



o
CO
O)
»~
^
LU









O)
o
u.


CO
o
I—
>
u.



^J


t/
<
u
«:
^
QC
U
H
H
H
2
u
5
^
n
b
—
a
5
C
c.
^
a.

u
01
-i
01
01


J
"^
_J
01
^
OI
_J
4
UJ
^
01
_J



_J
OI

01
-1
I
1
_J
0)
^
01
^J


o
a.

UJ
5
§
00
OI



J


>
5
•
J
E

i
i
j


•
i

i
j

>
j
>
j

^
•
• -
•









H
00
•^ o o in co «>T o
es tn a*
o

^
oo

sr o o in n •» o
CN O\
O

(
ao
sr O o m m •& f-i
CN . O

O


1






_!
m i O
«u2^ . S - ' « »
4) M E ntJ 4J Q U -H C
woo) jj^ijj o Saw o
9) JZ WfitlJCS 01 3 wCS. 0 60
^:«u ojeijeoo 4-i-.u na cw c
S g *J M ^ -H UC-H O O03S rf!U iH
«,-H OOO 3f-(
oaT i22co o*J3 >4^iM tu'cura "^ ^ "Ju nU
CO C 1) t-iJ-li— IWi Q. O C > &• 00 CO>> So
>w -H g . H4j ojwiaj OPU oou aj55 e
r^3-o 0.00 «-i 4jeu-iir< j^oic ou-n a)i-i tnvjo U-H
WMi-l-HOOrH CJC CCJ.UT3-H 3C3 U
O SJJJ W-H o -H O U-i • 3 01 iJ >~, cO JJ 73 C w*J cuwcu ccoo o*-»
03OI-i(0 OCUCC3 C" i-> C i-ti-H4)t-( J3 ur-i -HOOT -HOJ c*!-!
OC OCQC303 O -HJJ O 0)wQ OO ^ OO> -HC
O *^3 CJ O ^J ^ iJ CO O ^o O 303 OJO3-H CUC^Q. OJC CUC rH|
•QW rQJET34) XI O« •— I i— 1 U2C3UQJ J3^COJ J3JIOO Cu iJ
£•£'-*•— 1 E^OOi—l EO.WQ. E' 60. (0 U SUOJi EOO< Ew
SgiHrfl 3C3)JMC8 33>a, 3 l-i O U 3OI-HC8 3 SJ WJ OO






















































oo
.
03
Q

>4
£
5
i.
a.
LU


-------
  «•' .                eivvmvjrviviciv i MU rnw i cw i

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ   ORD     MEDIA:  Air
 Characterization and Measurement Methods
 Development (A-130)           "                     REG.         APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The major objective of the characterization and measurement methods
  development program is new and/of, improved methodology and instrumentation
  technology which will be utilized in stationary source, mobile source, and
  ambient air quality research.  A major program is the development of sampling
  and analysis techniques for identification and measurement of pollutants
  from stationary sources which focuses on the development of sampling procedures
  to•support requirements for New Source Performance Standards (NSPS).  A second
  major program is the development of sampling and analysis techniques for mobile
  sources emission which will include characterization studies to describe
  gaseous and particulate emissions from advanced power systems for light and
  heavy duty vehicles.  A third major program is the development: of new and
  improved measurement methods for criteria and non-criteria pollutants in the
  ambient air.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
     o  Development of a method for fractionating organic particulate emissions
       •from diesel exhaust to enable testing for mutagenic potential.
     o  Field studies on sulfatff measurement methodology have indicated that
        there is good agreement between several wet chemical techniques and
        x-ray fluorescence analysis.
     o  Development of low cost instrument for the continuous measurement of
        sulfur dioxide emissions.
     o  Quantification of primary sulfate emissions (5-10% of total sulfate)
        found in oil-fired power plant plumes.
     o  Preparation of a manual for the measurement of asbestos fibers  in
        environmental sample.               - ...
                 *

  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       The FY-79 program in characterization and measurement methods development
  will continue to carry out research related to stationary source performance
  standards, ambient air quality, and mobile source emissions.
       In support of the ambient air quality program, the research will focus
  on methods for characterizing and measuring sulfates, including specific
  molecular species such as sulfuric acid,< gaseous and particulate nitrates,
  organics, and carbon fibers.
       In the stationary source area, large sources of sulfate emissions will
  be studied for their contribution of primary sulfates to the ambient sulfate
  burden.  In addition, work in this area will address the measurement needs
  associated with an accelerated NSPS schedule as described in the Clean Air Act
  CAA) of 1977.
       The mobile sources research program will focus on characterization of
  light and heavy-duty vehicle (e.g., diesel) emissions of nonregulated
  pollutants.   Emissions  from advanced control systems (e.g., dual and 3-way
  catalysts) will be quantified.  Also, a low NOX research vehicle testing orogra
  will be conducted.
EPA Form 2410-iO (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

 rORM  2» DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
m 	 - 	 - 	 - 	
W* DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ
A130 CHRCTRZTN & MSRMT MTHDS DVLPMT-AIR
MEDIA} AIR
APPRO: R & D
8, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79 C.  E.  FY  80 INCR    FY  80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         58.0          63,0         47,0          «7.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          3.0           3.0          2.0           2.0
01 OF  04   '        FTE                       67.3         57.9          57.9
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.03     5,000.0      8,532.7      5,349,5      5,349,5
 C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE'BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Activities
       The FY-80 base-level program continues  the emphasis of the FY-79 base
  program, with a minor shift in emphasis from sulfuric to other acids in the
  stationary source characterization studies.

  Stationary Sources
     o  Develop, select or evaluate reference  methods for 10 NSPS per year.
     o  In depth characterization of specific  sources for total acids;
        hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride and nitric acid.
     o  Develop and evaluate, through field studies, area wide measurement
        methods for extended sources and fugitive emissions.
     o  Develop or improve sampling procedures for atypical sources.

  Mobile Sources                     :
     o  Characterize emissions from vehicles, with emphasis on particulates
        -from diesel .powered vehicles.
     o  Characterize emissions from NOx demonstration autos as required by
        CAAA 1977.
     o  Conduct pollutant specific studies  to supply information For OANR to
        fulfill Congressional requirements..
                                            . »*

  Ambient Air
     o  Complete development of a measurement method for non-methane hydrocarbon
         (NMHC) to replace present method and field test.
     o  Continue development of a ruggedized automatic dichotomous sampler for
        use in a variety of field conditions.
     o  Development of measurement methods  for ambient sulfates.
     o  Characterize air in selected cities for sulfates and total acid content.

  Impact                                 ^
     o  Funding of activities at this  level provides for direct response to
        Congress, OANR or attempts to  solve outstanding problems such as the
        NMHC measurement problem of the Regional Offices.
     o  Not funding this level will eleminate the ability to perform the basic
        requirements of the CAA-77 for NSPS and mobile sources regulations.

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

 FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

 A. DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          HQ      MEDIA:  AIR
 A130 CHRCTRZTN  & MSRMT  MTHDS DVLPMT-AIR         APPRO!  R  i 0

 B. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT          58.0         63.0          10.0         57.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          3.0          3.0           1.0          1.0
 02 OP  04            FTE                       67.3           6.4         6«,3
    BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     5,000.0      8,532.7      1,069.9      6,419.4
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Activities
  Stationary Sources
     o  Develop and/or evaluate continous  in-stack and remote monitoring devices
       for use by Enforcement.
     o  Develop a source sampling system for  snecific hydrocarbons.
     o  Develop generally applicable sampling and measurement technology for
       parameters including particulate mass and sizing, flue gas velocity and
       sample collection points.                                         v
                                       i
 Mobile Sources
    o  Develop special purpose samplers particularly for short cycle  state and
       local vehicle inspection.
    o  Develop and evaluate total hydrocarbon measurement method  for  diesel
       vehicle exhaust.

 Ambient Air
    o  Develop a sampling method  for organic vapors in general  and optimize for
       specific compounds identified by other programs.
    o  Develop a low cost sampling and measurement system for sulfur dioxide and
       hydrogen sulfide for  use in non-degradation areas  and begin an evaluation,
    o  Conduct studies to link previous respirable particulate  matter (RPM) data
       with newly defined Inhaled Particulate Matter (IPK).
 Impact
    o  Funding provides  minimal capability to initiate studies on direct acid
       emissions from power  plants and boilers, and support of diesel vehicle
       emission evaluations.
    o  Not funding would eliminate all work on stationary  source and emission,
       short-cycle development for vehicles and measurement method development
       for specific organic  vapors. The work on organic vapors will be needed
       to support many of the new source performance standards currently under
       development.
EPA Form 24)0-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

  ORM 2J  DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
w,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE         HQ        MEDJAj AIR
A130 CHRCTRZTN &  MSRMT MTHDS OVLPMT-AIR          APPROj R  &  D
• •• • mmmmm»»'*m***'*»'*m''m***'mmmmmmmmmmm**mmmmmmmmmmmm9mm*"tm*>mm9mmmmm*'mmmmm
8   RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79  C. E.   FY 80 INCR   FY  80 CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT         58.0         63.0           6,0         63.0
 LEVEL              OPFT        .   3.0          3.0                        3.0
03  OF 04            FTE                       67.3           3,0         67.3
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     5,000.0     8,532.7      2,113,3      8,532,7
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
                                        •
 Activities
 Stationary Sources
       Measurement of specific  organic pollutants in primary and  fugitive
       emissions in response to FY  79 OMB pass back.
 Mobile Sources
       Characterize vehicle  emissions for unregulated pollutants with emphasis
       on organics.  (OMB pass back).
       Develop sampling methods  for organics in exhaust and evaporative emissions
 Ambient
       Continue development  of  aerosol sizing instrument with  capability in the
       0.1UM to 25UM size  range.  The instrument is to be used for laboratory
       studies in other areas and to calibrate field type instruments.
       Synthesize marker compounds for use in quantitative analysis of organics
       in air.
 Carbon Fibers-
    o  Continue work on methods for detecting a"nd measuring carbon fibers in
       emissions and in ambient air.
    o  Studies on safe disposal methods for carbon fiber wastes and carbon fiber
       composite materials.

 National Bureau of  Standards  (NBS)
       Utilization of  NBS  expertise to help solve environmental air pollution
       problems especially in the area of sampling and analysis.
 Impact
    o  Funding will  allow program to provide information on  the need to control
       specific  organics from stationary and mobile sources, and to provide
       marker compounds for accurate analysis of organics in sources and ambient
       air.   Also, NBS expertise will be available to EPA measurement program.
    o  Not funding this level will eliminate research efforts on organics and
       the availability of NBS expertise.  It should be noted that the organics
       activities are basic to work on toxics under a different DU.- Also work
       on carbon fibers would have to be terminated.
                                                                    JUS 7
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------




















u
z
ta
^
>-
z or
o «t
•-• Si
t- r.
o —
uj to
IT U
s
_> c
< in
*- UJ
Z £E
tu
I 1-
Z "•
o z
cr n
> z
Z O
UJ *••
era
O !•*
ku U
^ yj
•* c
Kl
C
•- a
** o
z u.
^




z
»*
1
r
ft

>
s
^ to
z c
uj z
a z
c.
> a
UJ en
o r

•0 tf

I Z
u »-
a M
« e
UJ »-
to o
UJ 2
a x
u
^
00' 3<£
^ ^
ru •*
I
1

9
cc
t>


CC
o- •*
— to
£
r
en
u
ru u
cc. z
o- •-
— z
z
•*
0-


cc
o-
••






UJ
«-
CO «
e> _i
v« ^;
r
zi
u


•-
UJ
o z
cc u>
C^ cf
•V (^
2

>-
&• UJ
f-
o- a:
— a
~
u


_>
r- 3;
O ^>
— o


























in Ki
e- r^
7 O
P^ Q
in ix.
in Kt
c- r-
9 O
K* 5-
in ru


in K>
• •
9- r*
=T O
Kl !J
Ch 0.
IT fW


in KI
oT «>J
cr o
•o ^
Cfc (k
in t\i




in *• 9 K> o o O"
O1 c — r- t*~ ru »*-
K» r^- m «
Ch ^ 
AJ f\l O- (?• Kt Kt f*
K* f\( C K» -ft *Q
in K> oj -*
u. r co r o
O ^ Z5 Z ^ *•
Z2 O < ^ CO
— •< r 2 z
0 1- « C
•- Z X >• i—
«J UJ *^ UJ < *~
u ts ** <-» _j —
> C H- to
UJ S SO
-ie o a.


a co
o- cc
— CD
9 CO
-o ru
a c
o* cc
— CO
a co
•c ru


a cc
• •
O- CD
w SO
a co
* »
-o ru


a eo
o^ aT
» CO
a co
» %
« 'ra




S3 ^ CO CO O O PO

a — KI cc
* ^ » *
« ru a ru





o- in a in o o sr
O* •" CC «• O -• ^0
^ a ru cc ••
o K> >^ a
^
v»


P~ O CO f- 0 0 Kl
ru rvi o* O' K> KI ^
KI ru o KI -G ^
m KI ru cc
« « * «»
co ru 4> KI



O O 0 O OO
e ••* o o cc**K!
o in a in in
o KV -c ru
in  _l « U. O. >-
O < 0 O. O U,
• UJ Z 0 >— *»
U. X CO « O
D i- n r •• -
z: o < *•* 'o
<\) «t X C= Z
o >- eo c
>- z x >- —
_1 UJ — UJ •< •-

uj H r o
— i ec c Q-


^- cc
ru o
Kl Kl
in cc
CD Kl
^ CO
fU O
Kl Kl
in cc
CO Kl


t- cc
• •
ru o-
Kl K>
m CD
^ ^
CO Kl


r- co
ru o-
Kl Kl
in ec
^ •
CO Kl




P^ c^ co cc e c KI
ru ru c- o KI KI r*
in KI ru cc
» * * »
cc ru •£ KI





Kl K> O 0 O 0
Kl Kl O — -C Kl
~ — s» in
— ru er o-
» «
ru —


r- o- co ^- o c KI
ru ru c*- » KI KI r*
KI ru o K) ^ ^
in KI ru co
•> » » »
tc ru -e KI



o o o o «s o
O —• O O CO Kl
e in a in in
o KI -o ru
in ru ru ru





^^
o
o
0 t-
V% ^ U^ lAJ
a •- _i~ u, o. "-
0 < C 0. C U.
• UJ CC O ^f ^f
u. X tc z: c
= — 3 r •» -
r c •< «- eo
KI < r tr z
e H- to o
>- Z X >• i-i
_J UJ •* UJ < ^~
> £: •- to
uj n n c
-JO. CO.



-------
o
z
UJ
2
O

H
U
UJ
K
o
CC
CL
uj  a;
E
>  w
2  w
UJ  H

    UJ
    U
    2
    O
   O
   ai
   'CC
   o

c.
h
B
.. CL
< O
5s CC
Q et
LU a.
S <






Q
3
O LU
X CC




^
c
r
^
<
Si.
4.
f
<
E
C
C
fl
c
C
u
T
C
J.
£
i.
C
a
0
_ V
LU j;
0 n
0 a
o s
*^ ^
II
21

£s
ISIONUNI
iracteri
0 ~
8*5
<

|
UJ
X

~
a.
5
0
u
0
u
K
2
s
i
5-
u.

.

LL
UJ
_J
_
UJ
U.


1
1
J
LU
^
UJ
1
1
UJ
UJ
_J
j
LU
^^
UJ
H
_;
LU
LU
«»
^^
en -,-
r o
•> cc
U. 0.

UJ
CO *~
2 I

> £
U. UJ


LU
c:
3
t/5
<
LU
2
UJ
h-
^_

Z
LU
«C
OMPLISHI\
U
u
<
m
-r~
•-•'._ - _r .
X
'







•
\ -
\ O 0 O
oo oo oo
' iH vO SO
t
1 o o o\
oo oo r^
SO h* CM
—1
•^ •
o o o o
oo oo oo oo
^^ ^^ ^o ^o






•





•Hl° X
SCO S-H'cJ8<8
**^ ^3 >~' *J tfl p § -S
a* B o o. o ju
C 03 CO Bed U 14 O4-iOi4
_0 ^3 SB6 «2 ° Mffl-HQJ

03 CO 60 AJ 4) S aco jj
ow m-a >-ie w 3 o w T-I UV^BJ
•HswiU V 0) O M B. u 01
S 2 c c?J "ao'iww taoeow
o°fl)topi2:»3lj •1~l'u ^^ o no-o
|J3 OLcZ-3-CS Q) CM Cr-l ID. (8 603 0) '>'LJ
>, O WS *° "* OO -H3 O«8 > MO -r-l UUw J
KO. SO OC4 fa u*J WO O> U OOJ fa
o o o oo o o oo o*










































s
oo
IN
o
o
u.
CL
u

-------
  --  "             ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGFJSiCY

FOKM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UKirTITLC (AND COCC)  (A-135)           HQ OW>      MEDIA: Air

    Monitoring Methods and Systems - Air            REG.         APPRO: R&D
  61  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOH ODJECTIVES
       The goal of this program is improvement of methods needed in obtaining
  reliable data for air quality monitoring as set forth in the Clean Air Act
  Amendments of 1977, P.L. 95-95 and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,
  P.L.  91-604.  Included in this program i« research,.in the area of collection,
  storage, and interpretation of chemical related data in connection with air
  surveillance activities as well as evaluating and improving measurement
  techniques and methods for monitoring air pollutants.
  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

       A  protocol has been drafted.and circulated within the Environmental
  Protection Agency (EPA) for a Respirable Particulate Network.  Equipment for
  a 25 station pilot system has been ordered for delivery in early FY '79.
                                                                ->•
       The Fuel and Fuel Additives monitoring and reporting have 'been maintained
  on schedule.

       The planning phase and initial data collection for a study of CO
  intrusion into sustained-use vehicles (as requird by the Clean Air Act
  Amendments of 1977) was completed.
  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
     """This  program responds to the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) and to
  specific directives from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).   A pilot
  study of 25  stations will be established and operated to provide data for
  a  decision on the makeup of the entire network (300 stations).   An additional
  75 stations  will be established following this decision.  The measurements
  on the CO  Intrusion Study will be completed, regulations will be finalized,
  registration and usage reports continued on fuel and fuel additives  (FFA);
  visibility measurements will be improved in support of prevention of signifi-
  cant  deterioration (PSD); the reference methods of total suspended particu-
  lates  (TSP)  will be evaluated and approved for publication (40 CFR,  part 50);
  an advanced  S02  monitoring method will be developed; keys for interpretation
  of aerial  imagery will be published;  a Standard Reference Material (SRM)
  program with the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) will be supported via an
  interagency  agreement (LAG).   In this program, system needs identified by five
  EPA Regions  will be addressed.
       In planning this in-house program, contracts, grants and lAG's  have
 been  considered.   The most cost-effective and timely program is a mix of  these
  options.
        J1LJ
EPA i-orf..?-! 10-10 (5-7.°.)  2V

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2J  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
   DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAf  AIR
  35  MONITORING METHODS & SYSTEMS-AIR            APPROI  R  & D
»„»•••••••••••••••«•••«••••••—••••-•••••»••••-»•••»••••<•«•••"•••••"••••••••••
B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT           6.0         21.0          16,0         16.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           1.0          2.0           2.0          2,0
01 OF 05            FTE                       21,4          21.4         21.4
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)       355.0      4,750.0      3,538,0      3,538.0
I  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  ACTIVITIES
  These activities continue support for  the  CAAA of 1977 with emphasis on
  improving air quality monitoring networks,  operating  Respirable Particulate
  Matter network, improving visibility measurements and data, and development
  of  regulations and registration of fuel and fuel additives.  Specific
  activities  and outputs are:

      o Continued operation and expansion (20 stations) of a quality
        controlled monitoring network for Respirable Particulate Matter.

      o Revised measurement method to support changing the air quality
        standards for suspended airborne particulate matter.

      o Continued evaluation and improvement of measurement systems  and
        preparation of guidelines on calibration procedures for continuous
      - air  analyzers.

      o Continued equipping and testing a mobile van to conduct on-site
        monitoring of airborne organics.

      o Continued evaluation of visibility measurements in National  Park areas
        and  collection of data to meet  requirements of section 127 of the
        CAAA of 1977.

      o Completed design criteria for airborne  laser system for measuring S02
        concentrations.

      o One set of imagery interpretation keys  for areas selected by  program
        offices developed.

      o Continued Fuel  and Fuel Additives Registration Program,  regulations
        development,  and usage reports.

      o Test protocols  developed and evaluated  for implementation of  Fuel
        and Fuel Additive Regulations.

  IMPACTS
      o Funding this level  provides continuation of data base for Respirable
        Particulate Matter  in  ambient air needed for setting a health  effects
        standard based on particulate air quality; continuous efforts  towards
        improved State and  Local Air Monitoring Stations and National  Air .-i t
EPA Form

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND COOL)  (A-135)
  Monitoring Methods and Systems - Air
                                                    HO ORD

                                                    REG.
MEDIA. Air

AW RO:
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                                FY 7S ACTUAL  FY 79 C. tST.   FY 80 INCH.
      FY SO CUM.
     LEVEL

    — OF—-
               POSITIONS
                            PFT
                           OPFT
                            FTE
              BUDGET AUTH (000.01
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF "CHIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIGE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES Of- NOT FUNDING.
        Monitoring Stations with quality controlled continuous analyzers;
        registration of and developing regulations for fuel and fuel
        additives provides advanced monitoring techniques needed to resolve
        questions concerning transport of pollutants.

       o Not funding this level will prevent the Agency from carrying out the
        mandates of the Clean Air Act Amendments and cause a serious setback
        in efforts to monitor and protect ambient air quality.
HP A
          ! 1 t f   '
          UJ.L,,:.
        24',0-11 (G-7M  «-/

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 ORM  2i DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
  .  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE         HQ       MEDIAj AIR
A135  MONITORING METHODS &  SYSTEMS-AIR           APPRO! R &  D

B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT  FY 79 C.  E.  FY  BO INCR   FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          6.0          21»0          3,0         19.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          l.o           2.0                        2.0
02  OF 05             FTE                       21.«          1.5         22.9
    BUDGET  AUTH. (000,0)       355.0      4,750.0        667.0     4,205.0

|  C. DESCrUBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  o  Expanded operation by approximately  30 quality controlled Respirable
    Particulate Matter stations including increased internal  quality control
    of the data generated.
 o Development/revision of an additional measurement method for a regulated
   pollutant selected by program offices.

 o Development/revision of a pollutant specific procedure for conducting
   on-site performance audits for continuous analyzers.  The pollutant will
   be selected from program office/Region priority list.

 o Development/revision of pollutant specific procedures for manual methods.

 o Completed test of procedures on the mobile van  to be used for on-site
   monitoring of airborne organics.

 o Completed~evaluation of visibility measurement  systems and increased number
   of clean air areas in data base established to  meet requirements of section
   127 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.

 o Development of laser-based airborne system for  measuring suspended
   particulate matter.

 o Expanded information base for fuel and fuel additives and increased
   number of usage reports.

 o Test protocols developed and evaluated for implementation of fuel and
   fuel additives regulations.

 IMPACTS
 o Funding this level will expand the Respirable Particulate Matter network
   to 150 stations (based on Total Suspended Particulate experience, a minimum
   of 200 stations is required).   This level gives guidance to monitoring
   programs on commercial calibration systems, and siting air monitoring stations
   and probes.  Also, this level  will increase information on noncriteria
   organics and provide more visibility information to prevent significant
   deterioration of clean air areas.

 ]o Not funding this level will result in no standard operating procedures
   necessary for the quality assured  operation of the Respirable Particulate
   Network.  The size of the network  (hence greater uncertainty in validity of
   important decisions on ambient air quality) will be inadequate.         JlL J
 EPA Form ?•:io-n (1.7?.)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
fft9HlWVIVW»9WWWA94t^WWfliWWWWW4iVVWVM*WWWwW ^ ^ w  • • » • W WwWWwWWW w W
A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA:  AIR
A135  MONITORING METHODS & SYSTEMS-AIR            APPRO:  R & D

B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY §0  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          6.0         21.0           2.0         21.0
 LEVEL              OP^T       '   1.0          2.0                   '     2.0
03 OF  05            FTE                      21.^           1.0         23.9
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)      355.0      4,750.0        445.0      4,65.0.0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACT1VI TIES OF THIS L-VtLOTJLY. DESCRIBE TH£ BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  o Expanded Respirable Particulate  Matter Network operation by 10 stations.
   internally quality controlled and subjected  to regularly scheduled
   performance audits "by Decision Unit  A-145.

  o Development/revision of an additional measurement method for regulated
   pollutants.

  o Technical guidelines for siting, instrument  calibrations, and maintenance
   for continuous air analyzers —  State and Local Air Monitoring Stations/
   National Air Monitoring Stations.

  o Development/revision of an additional pollutant specific procedure for
   conducting on-site performance audits on  continuous analyzers.

  o Development/revision of an additional_pollutant specific_ procedure for
   manual methods.

  o Development and issue of a Standard  Operating  Procedures Manual for reference
   or equivalent instrumental methods.

  o Demonstration of on-site measurements of  noncriteria organic pollutants
   using equipped mobile van.

  o Development of laser-based airborne  system for measuring ozone.

  o Initiation of methods development for overlaying multiple data sets
   for use in conducting environmental  assessments.

  o Appropriate usage reports for fuel and fuel  additives program.

  o Test protocols developed and evaluated for implementation of Fuel and Fuel
   Additives Regulations.

  IMPACTS

  o Funding this level will provide  data for  national assessment of respirable
   particulates and aid operation of the State  and Local Air Monitoring Stations
   and National Air Monitoring Stations.  This  level meets the minimum require-
   ments of the Clean Air Act Amendments, including improvements of the
   National Ambient Air Monitoring  Networks  data.
EPA Form 7UO-11 (S-78)

-------
                       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
  FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
HTnM-CISlON UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) (A- 135)
Monitoring Methods and Systems - Air
HQ OED
KEG.
MtDIA: Air
' APFtlO: R&D
LEVEL
•3 	 OF-S 	

POSITIONS PFT
L OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















B.
              .: SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCH.   FY 80 CUM. \
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    o Not funding this level will result in no standard operating procedures
      necessary for the quality assured operation of the Respirable Particulate
      Network.   The size of the network (hence greater uncertainty in validity
      of important decisions on ambient air quality) will be inadequate.
4
                                                                     OILS
                                            j
  EPA Form 7J10-15 (G-73) f-/

-------





















>-
u
z
UJ
is
<
>-
z c
o •«
*• X
I- Z
0 =
UJ CO
»—
O UJ
CX 0
Q. ft
3
_l O
< m
^~ UJ
Z tt
LU
r i-
z •-
0 Z
a: r>
> z
z o
UJ *-
CO
CO —
U) U
t- UJ
•« o
CO ••
to
o
u* Z.
t- o:
z u.
s



CE
<
I
o?
z
UJ
^
03
t- >-
z in
U.'
Z •£
0.
o to
—1 O
UJ C
> x
UJ H-
o ui
r
•C
Ci
X Z
U 1-1
CC Ct
< o
u> »—
IO 1—
ID Z
C O
T.
0* /-»<
O< in
- - u to
* —
ru <

a
cc
0-


to
cc
€?• ^
— t»
UJ
t—
r
*-
to
Ul

ru u
CC 2
O- •->
" * «T
r
<
«J
O-


wrt
oc
o
M




Ui
»-l
o *~
a: -i
^* «J
— s>
£

u


N—
z
UJ
o 2:
(O aJ
o- cc
— u
z


*•-
CO
o- yj
^
o- a
— a
^

- 1
cc «c
t~ r>
o- t-
— o
<.
























0 0-
co in
10 a
in o
fO —
o e>
cc in
po a
in 




o c o v o o a
ec o- o- in •*> fu —
to in r~ a ••• fu
in in o- t>
« ^ » »
to — — —



o o o in o o a
o cc ru ru — ru —
in in o- — ru ru
r~ -o c *
» » % *
a — to ru

o o to o o
in in in -x> —
in in o-
to to —





.


o
c
o t-
 t- u. UJ
in ** _j .-.u. o. i-
O •< C £V C) U-
• UJ CC O -^ -w
u. x to — o
o >- D r w —
D O < ^ O>
— C X CC. Z
e t- 05 o
•- Z X >- i-<
_J UJ <-< UJ < t-
UJ U «^ ^^ _J t-l
> c t- to
uj — ' no
_i c on.
0 X>
in ru
o •-
ru to
a ru
o cc
in ru
o »
ru to
a ru



0 CO
• •
in ru
o — •
ru to
* *
a ru


O CO
• •
in ru
o —
ru 10
^ %
a IM


o c o ec o c. c-
in co r» ru o ru ru
o in a — — ru
ru cc 10 to
a — ru ru




o o o o o in
^ o- co -c to ~-
•D  — •
in in t>
to to —








^%
o
o
O i—
«* *- u. uj
in -' j <^ u. o. t-
c < o a o u.
• uj a: o —* +~
U. X 05 ^ 0
0 •- 3 z «• ~
3 o •< ~ «o
iv < x a z
e t- 03 o
t- Z X >• 1—
— J UJ •— UJ * t-
UJ (J> ^^ ^-* _» I-*
> Cs t- to
UJ => 3 C
_i sr ca.
0 *
0 t^
in in
•c in
a ru
0 -O
• •
0 »~
in in
•c in
a IV



o -O
• •
o r-
in tn
* IT

a ru


o -c
• •
O I*-
in in
•tj in
^ ^
a ru


c c o -c o o o
o co ru t- — ru to
in in o- in fu ru
* o in in
a ru ru ru




o o oco o o
in o in a ru —
a o a a
a ru ru ru





o o o m o o a
o ic nj ru — ix —
in in o- — ru ru
r- « o «

a — to ru

o o to o o
in in in .e —
in in o-
to to —








o
c
o t—
W t— U. UJ
in <-• —i^ U- Q. t-
o <. o a o u-
• UJ CC O S-* ^^
U. X to 3 0
o *- n z ••» ••
r? c « •- »
to < x a: z
C5 t- CO O
»- r x >- i-
_J UJ •• Ul < *-
Uj o *•* *^ —1 ••*
> e t- co
uj n r> o
_i cr o a.

-------
a
O
UJ
1-
O
•
a5!
2 -a
S§
23
-£
t- ^
1=
-, 60
55
5S
0 4J
vJJ —i
o e
o
-cs



1U
IU
1


t-
*£

t/3
ZJ
Cu
0
u
o
ULATIVE
*^
5
o
03
U.



1
i
>
1J
4
UJ
^
IJJ
L '
*1
UJ
UJ
-1
H
UJ
UJ
_J
UJ
lif
r—
>1
U- a.
01
h-
U_ UJ



UJ
I
2
cO
UJ
2
.L.
_1
0
o
03





o m en •» »» r-4 o
S °


o «* en .«n «n t-( o
00 O
""! p-(
O en CM CM es r-t o
2 o
^^ f^


0 es ^ M ^ o 0
*"*
0 ^ H 00 0— 0


O O o es cs iH o

o o o o o o o

y
•H i-t a) oi
i» yo>o8 yoa -oyo, >»
>^ « yO 0.-HOT3 0,0 WSUiH O
•H -O O«rl W0330)00jr T3U4> 4J .
.."2 "S^ T34J ICO 4J C0)> «OI>-
••xyc Q)4J a ug^aH JWQ) CO^wQ) }-i604JT3 lH'rf scy 3 a CMU fHOC-n
* M >>H. o o 5 " c>5»j-> £ i— i c •<-> y
ISR2 ,_TP 3U Cu3<»-(. O.E"O T-la33 -HOy-H
*jyo MTJU coo -OTS M ^y -HM3SJ ^fOjii r-ly SjJ
U^OO OO)O C3 a O at f> CO) OO-U AJCOO co-HO
iJ *J 2 f-f tJ rH , < LJ U iW 1_| M i2 _£j ii *m Li 2 m LJ ^"
^^ 03 *J (U ^^ ^ (UC5^ D O V-* £0 QJ y > CUQ) Q CJ C
»wz£ ED.M SBus SD.C.CO S«-iT3 sooo M'JJ!






























W
CO
CO
(N
-T
^
a
u.
a
LJ
                                                                           Jll',7

-------
o
z
UJ
a
u
at
H
O
CC
a.
ui rr

if

§1
2
UJ
C/3
I-

2
UJ
  O
  u
  u
  O

  C/3

  CJ
  UJ
  Q
  'CC
  O
  u.


n e
"H ^
< B
.. a.'
< 0

ll



§
O
C3
O ui
X CC



















ui
rH -H
L ^
^-^ i
i
_
g
4)
— — 4J
at m
Q >
O w
_
C3 r*
I«
Ul T3
-1 O
£ js
r- aj
t s
2 60
D C

2 Tj
2 0
"*- *H

UJ 0
Qjg
^^ *fc*
«£




CO
Z
Ul
?
CO
Zj
1
o
CJ
JLATIVE



O)
^
^
UL






_J
Ul
Ul
—1
I
-I
Ul
Ul
-1
J
_J
Ul
^
iij
d
Ul
Ul
-I

H
^
Ul
Ul
-1
^
—I

^
UJ
05
O *
- o
> s
u. a.
Ul
f—
r>« ^
cn S
»— I™
> 5>
U. Ul





Ul
CC
^J
U)
UJ
^
00
UJ
K
2
uu
^
w

0.
o
u
u
«3[

03


-
•

rH rH rH f- 1 rH OS O
co oo co oo . co r»coo
rH rH fH fH rHOO fH CJ\ O
g ooo«n ooo cntsrH
O rHOO O rH rH CM CM
rH O rH rH rH rH O
rH rH i-| rH CM, O O
oo co co co cooo r*coo
<-( rHiHrHCS rHOO rH CT» O
O OOO O fH rH fl CM rH
0 OOO O . CM (M
rH rH rH fH i-t rH O
!-4 rH rH rH t
OJ rH •OPT3>
•H S J3 JJ 00 -H -O 4J 03 > JJ 01 0) 4) -H
JJ 4) | 03 JJ . O 4) 0) 0) -HP 3 o, JJ jj
CS JJ V4>.C rH J= 03 03 CO CD JJ O pu O 03 -H
30) Olcna (Q JJ 3 JJ T-l CS, r-l 3 -O
rH>« 03 JJ JJ 0)(QrH Iw 13 4» • T3 4) rH T3
CO 03 CO C 3 U C . 3 JJ P O O -O )-l 03 C >cge8
> rHO •
0) 60 *r*i rH JJ S *M *T3 ^M C CU 0) 0) •• T7 0) rH x— ^
C • >J-t JJ O JJ G • O 0) U fH M 3 i-J. 03 4) 5
iM^Hcfi Q*HC3» cfj OtQ Q)Q}S 4) CQ*MO)CO)CQ 3cd
O^iCO CO S M^JJrHOJC 0130) 3OrH-H"41rH
C JJ )-i C 3 -H 0) > .* 0) T-l U >-l CO O JJ CJ U -O >s
O -H a cu cr m jj c E JJ c -H coo >>co «-> co o o c oa
jjoj^cueoeo fH o o s no e o u P 300
0)SUO C 3 rH-HrHScSO) rHCN OlOCOOLlUrHCB
rH CCJ rH CO iH CJ CTJ JJ QA Cfl ^^^ 4J *W O 0) O« Q^ 0) JJ
a >>eu ajjjw -^o)-Hco>coa3ao 3 u •* a s c
& U > CO 3 JJCUJJOIC3C C "3 CO -O JJ JJ JJ U- 4)
O'H'HOl>IMOO)OI't3T-IO-H CO) SOtcgeOOBOJ B
CJ •— 1 CO T3 tO O CO N CO )-i >,T4JJ CO JJ CTtQjJ>CUOI VJ O)
-r-l c 4> 0) C/J CL, O O. S-i CO iJ O • 0) 03 C -H H H 4) )-(
O-H-HOO OO)-OJJCQ.CCja-H JJ3
03 jj su jj oiceoiaoiooi'a ocr
a) -H 03 4) 41 O COCO>>«-iOO)CJO UhrH?3 01
JJ > 2 JJ M U-l JJ-HJJOOUS)-lCJUlD.Q.< rHh
rfl CO 4) cfl 4> 4) a rH
OO COO CUPri-M < _






















1
CO
oo

IX
*^
o





0.
Ul
                                                                            »

-------
                        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
        DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
        Technical  Support  (Air)     (A140)
HO   ORD

REG.
MEDIA: Air

APPRO: R&D
     B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES  The goal pf this effort is to use ORD
    resources to assist the Regions and Program Offices in the solution of Agency
    problems. Through the  use of ORD equipment, expertise and experience, this
    assistance will augment existing resources in the solution of problems wherein
    .the Regional staff or  Program Office staff is over extended, or does not have
    the requisite expertise or equipment. ORD is unique in that it has the broadest
    spectrum of technical  expertise and scientific equipment within the Agency.
    Thus,  ORD can and does supply the latest state-of-the-art knowledge within the
    Agency.   This expert capability supports all regulatory programs and ensures
    that regulatory actions reflect accurate data.  Large segments of such support
    are provided to Enforcement,  Air Programs, Office of International Affairs,
    Regions  and in some cases, other Federal or State Agencies. Support includes
    monitoring, analysis,  remote sensing, aerial photography, testimony at hearings
                                and Prograni offices-
    Regions ;  Provided guidelines on sampling and analysis data handling and valida-
    tion and provided rapid response, special analytical services monitoring
    ambient air and emission sources; Office of Enforcement: Provided monitoring
    analytical and data analysis support for enforcement studies. Served as Referee
    Laboratory for analysis of lead and phosphorous content of gasoline for enforce-•
    ment actions; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Procured, performed
     cceptance tests and distributed 350,000 high-volume, glass fibre filters for
          . JIAS3L.,Jtoni.tored-NafcLoaaX-Eorefr&s—f-or--&aone--levels.-Conducted field
            and determined atmospheric loading of pollutants being considered for
    regulation, such as benzene and nitrogen oxides on a short term averaging
    basis; Office of International Affairs: Served as the World Health Organization*
    Collaborating Center on air pollution'control. Stored, retrieved and published

     D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION  Complete  Hawaii SOx.. monitoring  study,  Oklahoma
    City  oxidant transport  study,  and  New  York City  oxidant and  sulfur  oxides
    transport  study.  Provide  technical acivfce  and review to Regions.  Perform
    analyses,  rapid  response  analytical services for specific elements  and
    chemicals,  aerial surveillance and Enviro-pod flights.  Provide  advice  and
    expertise  to the Office of  Enforcement, analytical support,  field monitoring
    protocols,  calibration  of instruments .and  serve  as  reference laboratory  for
    National Fuels. Surveillance Network. Procure,  perform acceptance  tests and  dis-
    tribute high-volume glass fibre filters for  use  by  NASN.  Develop  performance
    specification, analyze  filters for presence  of up  to 56 chemicals and  carcino-
    gens. Monitor ozone concentrations in  National Forests  and provide  reports  to
    EPA and USDA.  Conduct field studies and determine  atmospheric loading  of pollu-
    tants being considered  for regulation.  Store,  retrieve,  correlate  and publish
    data  from  global-wide air monitoring network in  an  international  agreement  with
    WHO and WMO.  Provide emergency response to requests for assistance  in  events
    such  as kepone,  Texas City explosion or PCS  spills.
     Emphasis  on this D.U.  has been shifted more tpward contract operations. This
    is.reflected in  the fewer in-house staff and an  increase of  S900K in contract
    operating  funds  for FY-79 as  compared,  to FY-78.  The use of total  contractor
    1 support was considered  but this approach would not  provide for  the  use of  in-
^MLhouse expertise,  which  in many cases is unique and  at the state-of-the-art.
    EPA Fom. 2410-10 (8-78)
                         J1L

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          HQ      MEDIAj  AIR
Al«0 TECHNICAL  SUPPORT-AIR                       APPRO:  R  i D

8,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. Et   FY 8Q  INCR   FY  80 CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT         56.0         36.0          27,0         27.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          3.0          6.0          6.0          6.0
01  OF 05             FTE                       54.6          <|0.1         UQ.l
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     1,900.0      3,561.0      2,670.7      2,670.7
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY, DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Activities

       Provide skeletal  technical support program to respond  to  request from
   OAQPS for specialized analytical and monitoring services.  Develop performance
   specifications  and procure 400,000 hi-volume glass fibre filters (cost for
   purchase of filters is traditionally covered by OAQPS).  Analyze limited
   numbers of selected filters for up to 56 trace elements, non-metallic
   inorganic ions  and benzo(a)pyrene organics. Provide consultation on analytical
   and sampling  techniques for OAQPS and Regions, review  of protocols and
   proposed procedures and provide low level response in  form of special
   analytical services.  Provide low level assess capability for  Regions' use of
   a data files  generated from special studies conducted  by EMSL-RTP. Provide
   unique air quality monitoring (in-situ and remote). Provide minimum level of
   Regional Services  (RS)  to assure communication, assist in  planning and arrange
   for assistance  to  Regions.

     Impact

       This is a skeletal level of technical support and  consultation. Without
   funding, important tasks and requests for technical support from OAQPS and
   consultations for  the Regions cannot be met. Office of Enforcement and Inter-
   national Activities needs will not be funded.

       Regions and OAQPS will not have ORD expertise for  solving air oriented
   problems.
ERA Form 24)0.11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2}  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
*mm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm»mmmmmmmmmmmm*mmm»mmm*»***m»mmmm**mm»9m*mmmmmm
A. DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA:  AIR
A140  TECHNICAL  SUPPORT-AIR                        APPROf  R & D
'••••••IVViW *• • • • V • • W • !• • • W • W^ M M MM M w ^ ^ M M • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ M M ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ _« ^ ^ ^  _»• ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
  ^    —• — •^ — ^ ^^ -™ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ w K ^B ^ ^ • ^ V 1* 1W ^ ^ ^ » ^ •• ^ ^ • V •§ ^ ^ 1**i •» *• Bl • IP W 


-------























U
z
U
<
>-
z cc
o •«
»- r
u =>
UJ CO
O UJ
a o
a. a:
_J 5
-< CO
*— UJ
z a
UJ
z «
o z
cc =
> z
z o
UJ >-•
(O
in — i
UJ U
H- U,
•K C
KI
O
UJ £
>- a
z u.
r;








z
UJ CC
z •->
a. «
O 1
UJ CC
> O
uj a.
=> n.
^
•# CO

<_> <
cc u
« »-»
UJ Z
O3 X
II 1 ^J
Cc UJ
^~
4
01 12*?
^ V4
(V <

g
1C
o-


KI
CD
o- «-»
— O3
UJ
»—
r
to
UJ

MO
CO Z
0- <->
— z
z
<
c.

GO
o
v«






Uj
C I—
ec «
0- _J
~"i


•-
UJ
c Z
CD UJ
O- O:
— o
•z


*-*
CO
O UJ
fs.
o- a
— tr
^
u
J
f- O
O- 1-
— CJ
























t^ un
c o-
»~- -c
•C 1C
nj ^
f~ «n
• •
o c>
r- -o
•O OD
^ »
M —



r- in
• •
0 0-
t*- •£
•C CC
^ ^
(VI —

r^ in
o o
»- «
« CD
» «
m —




r~ f^ o in o o —

* ^- O 6C
* * te
ni — —


r^ r- o in o o ••
o c^ « o- t>- -c o
^  KI
o o o KI in
o- cc KI







«•«
o
o
o *-
*> »- U. UJ
o < o a. o u.
• UJ CC O *** ^*
u. I IT — 0
O *- O I f> ••
n o < »- co
— < x cc z
0 t- 03 C
1— Z X >- *^
_J UJ *~ UJ < f-
> C »- en
UJ 3 => O
— i cc o a.
CC 3
9 KI
O 9
 TV 9 C O 4>
9 r- r^ KI (v» ^ i\j
O x CO 9 KI 9
rvi — o ni
* % » »
KI «VI -• W


— 1> rvio- o in
s rv »* KI in rvi
KI in cor»
in KI -*Kt





o o- -»r- o o -o
— «M 00 <\l O « 9
•o in o o KI in
in KI rvi 9
% * ^ *
KI IV *^ (VI

O O O O O O
o in in o ^ K>
o o «> KI in
0 CC KI
— - ~






.^^
O
o
o *—
IK t- U. U
o « o a. o u.
• UJ CC O ^^ ^
u. x co n c
o »- 3 z •» —
3 O < «- 05
M < X CC Z
C H- CO O
^ Z s< >~ *-•
_JU) -™ UJ < t-
UJ (S ^ ^ _J M
UJ Z) 3 O
_t«C 00.

-------
<

z
o

H
o
LU
H-
o
CC
0.
LU




























>
cr
S
D
^^


LU
S
13
\CCOMP
^•^
H
2
O
CO
O
LU
Q
5
O
LL



C
M X
"*

.. aJ
< O
5 £
UJ Q^
S <





a
OS
o

a ui
i: cr















o
. 2
Ul "
Q ~
s?
o ^^
z^-
ss
t 0.
*~ 3*
^
isioNur
hnlcal
(J C
S a>
QH
<





to
H»
2
Ul
^£
«2

Q.
5
0
(J
0
LU
L^
<


1
>





o>
>
u.

00
0)
^
u.


u
c
I
<
u
«
«
a
u
h
?
K
4
u
«
b
C
«
c
c.
<
c


Ul
Ul

_
Ul

Ul
J



_J
Ul
^
Ul


J
Ul
Ul
-1
M
Ul
Ul
-f
_l
Ul
Ul

cc
a.
Ul
5
10
Ul


u
c
3
o
t
J
»
9
LI
J

»
]
J
J
.
5
J
I
a























O •» O O O c»l O O O

•
-a-
oo o oooo

• m g g
do' * °°


- «n m oo
^^oo o srg^g


i
H^2 ir<" ^S^
2 ° iJ 2 ^ ? "5 « s • 5 ' o "
*j_. T; •"/-> «-i u c 3 1-1 T-io5 ij"-1 o>*-ii«
^ * S* a,S ° S gS^^S § ° g. § u.
°_ 0^ JO G^te >> 4)OC tDCB utfl O
u2 Q° ^ i ° ^ I UUCU tBU rH-^ T3C
H " °^^Hti ™ c ^ * oo CBCO ^11-100
Uj- ^ AJC8 BJCB C3 Or— 10) U U>«c3,
^i Ij «S =*=I-IB o GAjpuajr-icB 4-1 ca-o*
s-s, fis ?i §s s «i: -g i5^:»M
« i-l OO-O 0) 0)*JCJ>,^ g o « 2 S 5 13 ^ °£ " -5 5^
woeo *" o,'5 OM^ W E2wB«c^MojuB!^1B)
« e « 3« §2 ec« c « §1 §£2 5.S1! 23 2 S 2
S.22. C^ ^^ HOO) tH. UC-CBcrtBo'e-O^CB 5-H
^ = T 2-0 "'S. °Ti^ 5 ££ c £^ ai^ ^ tZ&l uZ
JIS §5 ^§ S5§ 2 & .-2^ . S^ . 2^ .2 g^
•<4-iN^fric.co-a->gca


Jii:









































CO

-------
u
z
UJ
u
LU

o
fT
a.
>

LU






























>
cc
<
2
s
TJT
C/3
^
^^
Z
LU
^^
X
C/J
_J
dIAIODOV

H
2,
D
•^m
Z
g
o
UJ
Q
4r
5
'CC
O
UL

06 Q
1-4 *^3
< »

.. Q.'
< O
O n
U Q.
2 <





a
as


CJ7
O ui
21 CC






















_
O
i— t
u75
Q
^j W
Q 

>.
UL




O
a»

^
UB


03
'^*
r-
>.
U.



L
!
i
<
L
«
C
t
i
?
1
i
I
«
i
1
(
<



-J
Ul
Ul
I
Ul

Ul



1
_J
Ul
^
Ul
!
m

^
Ul
J
j
^^
_J
Ul
>
Ul
H
-1
Ul
Ul
->
o
cc
CL

Ul
<
2

CO
Ul



u
Z
3
n
t
u
>
a
a
j
—

•-
Z
u
>
E
£
J
1.
E
3
j
=t

a






















\O eM i-l O
r-t O O O



O O O 0 0 O
•-I O
\o
i-( «N tS C>» CN i-t r-t



«
s
^ tS C>4 «S P4 i— ( i— ( '-i
*-» c
^
2
1 r-t 0) C
fJj (^ ^^ y.^ ^
1-tgao.u e u« u j=c
03 OS p • 4-> E -H O -H CJ t— ! • i— I -H 03 t
AJ •najOlScS'i-' -HU4 >-H«O O CB -HCP
03. O 4_> J_l 0) CD 03 EDO — iCCg^^OCl-i'O rH rHQO
cn3-tHQ.4-io3'^4Jtn y1**! OU-H 4j-HCO"oo. c o 3 4j o
O O" C C^ 00 P &« CJ OjJ CO ±J Q) ^^ ^ QJ 4J ** 03 4-1 O *H O O ^H Q< CQ V'
O W O TO O U O O* ^^ C P AJ CO CO fli CO ^J * 3 rH *H AJ
u-i 4J o"3 rH s o coMw5a'^> cfli-tcea.t
JJrHAJOJ"tg-»-tCDC8O UJCO -H CCO rHJJPO /^.OlCOaJOjC
rHaJ3Q)4J03T)rH'Q T3 5 UJ-l-ri U-4i— i34J3«CD4-l>j>W<5
CO 1— 1 03 rH CO 0) CU rH Up COCO .COOrHCU J4UeOCUCUu
C fi« 53 O> CU y *^J 13 ^N CO *** CO C QJ E y CJ rH W S W C "H jQ «rH 0
'OSOES-HC-Hi-iyO -3O3!«! O OOOI cflWirH
•HOyoo<>ca3$*H EC « cr J-i CD •^ u_ &4 ou^Eu^i— lutgCJ
SOy O 0) U 00 41 4-1 ^fe O( T^ UCUU-4 O Ol UH 4-< 3 O 8J ^ "C
Ol rH U 0) 03 C >.'«-' CO C l-i CB« PM aiy CMO"^1
PSUJCB> M CCOC-HOCOCOCO rH>
ouoo i-4occo> cy a>ooc/3oC ^— ' •UCCUUCOP8C
OSUSOXTSS-HCCJC-r-icacOO' OO3C O.4)S'H*J4)a.-H>— • C
CUS SC.rHrHZ> j:>Q -H O.CJCficaOO4-l rH-H-^Oy CflJ
a. u cocgci) o on o c •o&c c. caor-i cu^ac^-i cuo^ —
3 -O • 9) C -H .WCOlJ -C4) 3 • O U S -4IO3O3 •PSOS



(


























1
1




















-^
IS.
"2
15
1
i7
2
IU1

-------




















CJ
z
01
C3
Z
g
H
CJ
UJ
H-
o
d
a.
_j
<
H-
z >.
UJ c.
ol
ED
> w
Z "5
111 S
UJ
X
en

_j
a.
ACCOM
i^
r"
Z
3
Z
g
CO
a
UJ
*5f
S
'a:
o
LU



a
hi 
LU





CB
^
a.

CO
CB
r^
LU



U
£
C
<
u
•
u
H
•
t
L
4
:
tX « "^ ' >>0 "* uc "-i n c o caor^x-.
'"iJ^'STj ^ o "H .c so j-icas tu AJ o«w
eoajLn «-i oo»2 cuuu o i-taT-StiS SiSSfo
en co-u^coo -H^M ui -H u • IH o IH c -H o *•* a •£
<" 22S)CB^ C83UH 0) VM i-4 TJ fti i-l O i O JJWti
o TJ M x v o a) v-' iJStn-H .oif^o4)>BJ->iJ UT^OS
•*-**' *H CUCJQ3 00*U(UO ^UhlQJJJCl) -, 4 "3
u o'^^'a1'3 "^c -H a *j D.COC8OC 1-1 Scuccu
o i-^T3co CM 30)-H tncjgc rH-acojS'Hoai oslS
C. COi— IT-IAJI— 1 i-H CO U 01 0) C8 i-l S) •— ( -S y >, ^5 iw -S *
O, >0)"Ohl C9 CO >rHUJJ >-0)-r5^1jT3 wSo-O
en Qu-iSQ-O UOQO Mtno.cn om'oHwuci (Sijcna. ^jLi 1













































r»
S
(X
f
U.
_
a,
LU

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ ORD       MEDIA:  Air

        Air-Quality Assurance.(A-145)                REG.         APPRO:  R&D
  B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

    The overall goal of the quality assurance program is to ensure that the
    environmental data EPA uses are sufficiently accurate, precise, and
    reliable to meet Agency needs at a reasonable cost.

    The objective of the ambient air and air pollution sources quality assurance
    program is to develop and deliver to the customer program those products and
    services which are necessary for making measurements under conditions which
    document the validity of the data generated.  This program effort  meets
    Agency  requirements for scientifically valid and legally defensible data
    to  support and enforce regulations and standards pursuant to  the Clean Air
    Act Amendments of 1970 and 1977, P.L. 91-604 and 95-95, respectively.

  C> FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

    Analytical Methods for Lead - proposed a Reference Method in  the NAAQS and
    proposed a stationary source emission test for SIP requirements; completed
    laboratory testing of a calibration procedure for ozone and proposed the
    method  in the Federal Register;  designated five equivalent methods for
    criteria pollutants;  completed performance evaluations for monitoring
    agencies as follows:  8 ambient air stations, 8 stations monitoring pollution
    in  connection with Western Energy programs;  2 stationary source stations;
    developed a minimum quality assurance program for SLAMS and PSD stations;
    distributed first section of Vol.  II  - Quality Assurance Handbook  for Air
    Pollution Measuring Systems.-
  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

    This program  is  designed  to meet the Agency requirements for scientifically
    valid data to  support  the Clean Air Act Amendments  (PL 95-95} and certain
    related programs  (i.e., Respirable Particulate  System, radioactivity in
    milk foods, and  airborne  particulates  and  support for the requirements in
    the NAAQP and  NRG program).  More specifically, tasks are included to
    evaluate and validate  the methodology  for  regulated pollutants  (S02» in
    stack particulates, H.S,  CS2» asbestos, carbonylsulfate); to evaluate
    methodology for  important non-regulated pollutants  (ambient H SO^, sulfates
    and arsenic^ to maintain  repositories  of QC reference materials and to
  •  develop new reference materials as required; to validate equivalent methods
    as proposed and  to assess the quality  of air pollution monitoring data.
       ull
EPA Form 2410-10 (3-78) £ •/

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

    M  2»  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
    DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HO       MEDIA}  AIR
 Al«5  DUALITY  ASSURANCE-AIR                        APPRO|  R & D
    ^^ M ^ M M w M M M^M W ^^ M • • WM •• M M MM W M • M M M • « W W • • • M WM • • • • V W * V V • • ^ W4P 4P • IV • m W W 4V• V
 8. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C.  E.  FY 80  INCR    ?Y 80 CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT          38.0         a«,0         33,0         33.0
  LEVEL             OPFT           2.0          2.0          2.0          2.0
 01 OF 05            FTE                       46.9         ai.«         fll.«
    BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)    1,448.0      4*901.0     3,676.0      3,676,0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCHIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  ACTIVITIES  -  The FY-80 base level continues quality assurance support for
  the  Clean Air Act Amendments for 1970 and'l977,  P.L.  91-604  and 95-95,
  respectively.  Major program emphasis will focus on improving National
  ambient  air monitoring data along with a shift of  some activities to determine
  the  performance of continuous monitors -of stationary source emissions.
  Outputs  will include:

     "o  Continued support for on-site evaluations  and audits of State and Local
         Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and ail National Air Monitoring
         Stations (NAMS) to implement quality assurance  regulations pursuent to
         section 319 of the Clean Air Act Amendments.

     o  Validated measurement methodology for regulated and nonregulated air
         pollutants  (up to 5 methods),  specifically a-Federal Reference_ Method
         for Respirable Particulates.

     o  A  repository of quality control and reference samples  for ambient air
         pollutants such as S0_, NO-,  CO, flow measurements, SO,, NO-, and Pb;
         quality control and reference  materials for stationary sources; audits
         of the performance of organizations making measurements in support of
         regulations, developing new regulations, and  air pollution criteria,
         and conducting research monitoring.

     o  A  repository of radioactive milk and food  reference samples to calibrate
         and test measurement systems  and to evaluate  performance of laboratories
         and analysts.

     o  On-site audits of continuous  analyzers for regulated pollutants in
         emissions from stationary sources (up to 18).

     o  Interlaboratory performance checks  of State and private radiochemistry
         laboratories and issue reports.

     o  Preparation and distribution  of quality control guidelines for radiation
        measurements.

     o  Continuation of program for implementing the  Ambient Air Monitoring
         Reference and Equivalency Regulation (40 CRF  53).
        Provide partial quality assurance  assistance  to other EPA programs,
        Regional Offices, State and local  agencies.
                                                                        J117
.EPA Form 2410-11 (0-78)

-------
•   . •     .             ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               *»
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNI f TITLE (AND CO06)
        Air-Quality Assurance   @
                    HQ  ORD

                    REG.
MEDIA: Air
                                                                  APPrtO:
        R&D
  u.  Ri:sounc:- SUM
FY 73 ACTUAL   FY /y C. fc'ST.   FY 00 INCH.
      F Y SO Ot iivl
LEVEL
1 5
POSITIONS PKT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (UCO.O)














I
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCHISE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     o  Continued asses'sment and reporting  on  the quality of air pollution
        monitoring data.

     o  Development and continued  operation of Standards  Laboratory—meets
        all EPA Regional needs with  some  support  to  States and locals.

  IMPACTS

     o  Funding this  level will continue  improvement of National air quality
        data and provide a minimum quality  assurance program for criteria .
        pollutants.   This level includes  semiannual  performance audits  of
        measurement systems for criteria  pollutants  only;  some methods  valida-
  	tioti -studies-?- and-pesvi4es per-f-enaance data  on  National monitoring of
        radioactivity'levels in milk,  food,  and airborne  particulate matter.

     o  Not funding this level will  destroy the base quality 'assurance  program
        for air pollution measurements and  future data  generated to show
        compliance with air quality  standards  and radioactivity levels  in
        milk/food/air will be of unknown  precision and  accuracy.
         JUS
EPA Fotm 2410-11 (0-78) Z

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

   LRM 2l DECISION  UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
   «t

   DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HO       M£DIA|  AIR
   5  QUALITY  ASSURANCE-AIR                        APPROi  R 4 D
 ^        ™ W^ ™ • W» • • •» 9 w V V • • • V • W W • 9 9 • W • • • • • VB W V • • • • • • • • 4V • 4B • 4B 4B • • W • 9 • W^ W *• ^f
8. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C. E.  FY 60  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          38.0         44.0          7.0         40.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           2.0          2.0                       2.0
02 OF  05            FTE                       46.9          3,5         44.9
   BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     1,448.0      4,901.0        736.0      4,412.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. OESCHIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    • o  Continued and expanded support of on-site  audits and reports for SLAMS,
        and measurements for non-criteria pollutants.

     o  Validated measurement methods for regulated and/or nonregulated air
        pollutants (up to 3).

     o  Validated measurement methods for alpha, beta, and gamma emitters in
        ambient air.

     o  Increased repository of quality  control  and reference samples for
        criteria air pollutants, Pb,  SO,, NO,  flow measurements, radioactivity
        levels in milk and food, and  alpha,  gamma  and beta emitters on air
        filters.                            .  ~

    - o.-.On-» site audits xor. continuous--analyzers  for- r-egulated pollutants in
        emissions from stationary source (up to  36).

     o  Increased quality assurance guidance and assistance for Regions, States,
        and local agencies.

     o  Development of, and expanded  operation of  Standards Laboratory.

     o  Performance audits for Dichotomous Sampler Networks.

     o  Performance audits for specialized monitoring programs: CHAMP, National
        forest ozone and visibility studies, and human and animal exposure
        chambers.

     o  Critical field evaluated performance audit procedures and equipment for
        in-stack monitors for opacity and particulates, sulfur oxides, nitrogen
        oxides.

  IMPACTS

     o  Funding this level will provide  validated .-methods for several important
        noncriteria pollutants, improved.quality control support to State and
        National monitoring programs;  a  data quality control program for
        stationary source measurements;  and  quality, control for measurements of
        radioactivity associated with airborne particulate matter.

                                                                        Ull'J
EPA Form 2410-11 (0-73) Z-f

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND COOE) HQ QRD MEDIA: Air
Air-Quality Assurance (A-145) R£G AppnO; R&D
B. RFSOURC:- SUMMARY FY 7S ACTUAL FY/yCfST. FY 80 INCH.
LEVEL
POSITIONS ITT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET A'JTH. (UCO.O)



-







F Y SO Cl-'-vl



!
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCUSBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     o  Not •funding this Level will leave much of the air quality data with
        insufficient quality control to document precision and accuracy.   The
        quality of the data used to make critical environmental decisions,
        set air quality standards will be of questionable validity.
        0120
-EPA Fo.m 2410.11 (3.73)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

     M  2! DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 A,  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE         HQ       MEDIA}  AIR
 A145  QUALITY ASSURANCE-AIR                        APPROt  R &  D
 fgf ^ ••••••••• • • V W • 4P ••••••'••IW •§ •• • • * • • W •• • * 9 • W "* • • •••>• W ••••••••• • • W • • • •*• W W w •
 B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.  E.  FY  60  INCR   FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT         38,o         44.0          a.o        aa.o
  LEVEL              OPFT         ' 2.0           2.0                        2.0
 03  OF 05            FTE                      46.9          2.0        46.9
     BUDGET  AUTH. (000,0)     1,448,0      4,901.0        489,0     4,901.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

      o  Continued  and expanded support for quality assurance and  performance
         audits of  SLAMS.

      o  Validated  reference methods for ambient air measurements, and two
         additional source emission test methods to be determined by  the Office
         of Air Quality Planning and Standards,  or other appropriate  program
         offices.

     *o  Validated measurement methods for radiochemical analysis of  human
         diet samples.

      o  Increased  quality assurance guidance and technical  assistance for
         program offices, Regions, States, and others.

      o  Expanded services of Standards Laboratory to cover  State needs to the
         extent developed, and more local agencies.
      o  Expanded quality assurance support for the Dichotomous  Sampler
        Network (DSN).

      o  Increased on-site audits for specialized research monitoring programs.

   IMPACTS

      o  Funding this level will add additional support  for  the  SLAMS and DSN
        and will improve quality assurance support and  overview of measurements
        of emissions from sources, sulfuric acid in ambient air, radioactivity
        levels in the human diet, and the operation of  a  Standards Laboratory
        to provide calibration of continuous air analyzers.

      o ' Not funding this level will delay our ability to  accurately assess the
        impact of emissions from sources on ambient air-quality, particularly
        the impact of using high sulfur fuels.  This level  of resources is
        critical to the implementation of a National quality assurance program
        for ambient air monitoring.
EPA Form 2410-11 (0-78) £-'

-------




















2
UU
^
V
2 tr
o <
H- I
o z:
UJ tO
O UJ
a. u
Cw CT
_1 0
< CO
H- UJ
2 a _.
UJ
r »-
2 1-1
O 2
tr =>
> 2
UJ •—
CO
CO l-c
UJ 
> z
UJ <
o a:
zj
•e co
en
I <
u
o: v
< •-
UJ —
eo _j
UJ <
or z?
e
<
< in
V 9
— ^- ,£ v.
rw <

9
CO
o-


Kl
CO
0- ~
— m
h~
I.
m
u

ru u
cc z
o- «
— z
z
<
a.
^^

cc
ly*
•••






LLJ
„
0 •-
ec <
0- _l
•M ^
r
r>
"

•-
UJ
c r
CO UJ
o- or
»• ft
z



*-
O- UJ
r*.
e- tr
•*• a:
Z3
u
_j
r* Z>
o- *-
""<


























O 9
•c o-
r- cc
•C Kl
Kl ru
O 9
•*> tf
r- eo
•C Kl
KI ru


O 9
• •
•e c*
»* ec
* Kl
» «
KI ru

0 9
-c o-
r« co
^ Kl
% «
KI ru




O O C 9 C O 9
* KI KI ej- KI ru —
r- 9 Kl CD Kl 9
•c •• in KI
* ^ ^ ^
. KI ru *^ ru



O O 0 9 0 «5 9
•C Kl Kl O- Kl M «—
r- 9 Kl CO Kl 9
-o — • in KI
» » » fc
KI ru -* ru




o o o r- o cs o»
— •-- 9 in 9 ru -c
O 9 in CC 9 9
V CC 0 —
* » ^ ^
9 ru ru KI

o o o ru o o
ec 9 9 — cc ru
9 ^ CO 9 Kl
9 in ec o-







»^
o
o
0 t-
«• t- U. UJ
in «•* j ^^ u. o>- *—
c < o a. o u.
• uj or c ^ «—
j. x to r; e
o •- r> s  —
3 C « ^ CO
— < r or z
o »- eo o
•- z x >- >-•
_1 UJ — UJ •< 1-
uj O ^^ ^ _J «-*
> c »- 10
klj Z3 Z? O
_j cc o a
0 C
ru r-
v* ,J0
9 CO
9 ru
C CO
ru r-
•* ^
9 CO
9 ru


0 CO
• •
ru >*•
— -0
9 CO
« *.
9 ru

0 CO
ru r-
••* ^
9 CO
« «
9 rv




0 O O CC 0 O O-
ru r^ in r* o ru 9
— « r* KI -a 9 9
9 in cc cc
* » » ^
9.ru — ru



c o o 9 c in
.C 9 ru CO t- Kl
Kl Kl O r-
r- 9 KI 9






O O O f~ O O O*
** r*- 9 in 9 ru •£
a 9 in co 9 9
o- cc o —
* ^ » »
9 ru ru K>

o o o ru o o
eo 9 9 — ec ru
9 -C CO 9 Kl
9 m cc c?1







f^
0
o
0 t-
M >- U- UJ
in »-• J « U. Q. r-
o «: o o. C u.
• UJ QT O *^ ^
u. I en z) o
O >- 3 X •» ••
n o « ~ v>
ru •« r or 2
o »- 10 o
•— 2 X >- •-!
_l UJ -» UJ « •-
UJ Ci »^ «- _l «
> O (-05
UJ O 2O
_»ec 00,
c r*-
— tn
0 CO
o- —
9 Kl
0 f-
— in
o cc
cr -»
9 Kl


o r^
• •
— in
0 CC
o- —
^ ^
a KI

o r~
— m
e co
0- —
« »
9 Kl




a c o t- o o O-
— r-- 9 m 9 ru -c
O 9 in CC 9 9
o- co e —
^ ^ » *
9 ruru KI



o o o o* o o
o- oo- f~ 9 ru
co r- — -«
9 rviru K>






o o o r- o o o-
•-i r* 9 in 9 ru ^
o 9 in co 9 9
9 CO 0 —
* te » %
9 ru ru KI

o o o ru o o
cc 9 9 — co ru
9 ^ CC 9 Kl
9 in ec o-







^
O
o
o >-
M *- u. yj
in v _j ^ u. Q. >-
c « o o- o u.
• uj or o *— ^
u. I co r> o
o >- z>r «• -
a o < ^ co
Kl < I or 2
o »- eo o
t- Z X >-«
_J UJ — UJ < •-
UJ 13 >-» "^ _l 1-1
> C h- CO
ID = 3 O
_J (E CO.

-------
o

UI
o
u
iu

O
CC
> w

2 K
W 2
   LU


   X
   co
   CJ
   2
   O

   52
   o
   UJ
   'cr
   O
   u.
OS C
< a

• • Q.
< O
s <




0
si
o

f*
2 *



^
i


V
u
c
C3
U
3
in
(A
"*•
^
u
T-l
CO
3
cr
i
ft
^



UJ
O
O
U
Q
Z
*t
UJ
•u
K
H
Z
DECISION
<


CO
Z
HI
£2
a.
O
U
u
UJ
1
3
5

§
o
^
u.



u
u

—
u
u


u
23
U
U
>
u



u

pw
~
u
8»
*" O
^ cc
U. Q.


UJ
 5
*"" p
^* V)
U. UJ





UJ
e
3
<
UJ
2»
ejj
111
_4
K
H»
H
Z
LU
S
v)
ACCOMPLI
CO










^3 ^5 ^3 CN( f^ *.Q ^J QQ *^




O OO eoc>»NO.d-ao» O ^^ n ^^
«-^ r-4




O OO CNv^tO^OOcvj
O O O 1-1 en t-<


1
O nj
i-t U
60 U T3 C
C U CO CO
•* e u . s to
U « CU T3.U -OT3AJ
O U Jj CO U OO U C O CCUU
JJ -H 3SOUOS O OS •>« ««O
•o 1-1 ~o •< w <; uj -H tu cu ui -HO.
CC C tnZ co U tou QJ O tf)>cu
CO O 35 i—* ^"^ CO *^^ T3O "O *JU CU"** CUCDU
2 cac/3 cocu*ou^ QJ f43 *u cu
ui tnus>,2J->cu jj "oo >cuc >c cc o iu sow E E^ co u QJ cu -o tn
•H -H tH JJ -H CU *O T3 O 3 *^3 cu u 4J *™^ W W O cu CO
WJJ*-N wcOiJ T34) OC-^ OU O«J UO3 CO.
i n co ijjco cu -o -G u X3 u-i u cuOiU coo «
CZZ CCOu 0) — < -U "3 C JJU) UIO JJ 4) cfl U •— i U
O < O CO C> CUC— * CU<0 CU W CUCU 30) CO
ojo^-'U-iOOOUwu to E QC T3 n co in 
-------
  >
  o
  <

  z
  o


  u
  ua
  H-
  o
  a:
  a.
  ES
  > w
  2 M
     LU

     5


     W

     _1
     a.

     S

     O


     O
     2

     O
     O

     LU
ull
M C
•rt O(
< S


.. a.'
< O
UJ 0.
5 <





Q
as
o
o
O iu
Z S






in
r-t
1
9)
U
C
ca
3
CO
en
"*
jj
»— *
3
o-
i»i


-•»
Ul
a
o
u
a
z
^
*•••
LU

— *
£
2
0
Z
o
trt
5
Ul
a

^



V)
H-
2
Ul
—
a.
5
0
U
u
ULATIVE
S
D
O
eo
a

u.





u
Ul


_,
Ul
^
Ul
j
1
_J
Ul
^
Ul
1
Ul
Ul
-4
1
**1
J
Ul
Ul
J
-J
Ul
>
J
a>

OS <^
£ O
u. £


Ul
ee <
o> S
>• v>
U. Ul


Ul
CC
«)

^
Ul
5
Ul

L^
^
H
f—
2
Ul
Z
C£
m
a.
s
O
u
u
<

ca



i
•





.





o
co
r- O O
vO
O


o
03
0 -* 0
in o
0
^
o o o — -*


1
i




















1
IB
"1 O O (•
r-.




0
0 10


•o
3 C •»
a> « co x ca
A G O U . • •
u to co eg
^J Ql T3
jj — bi Q Vj **
o u 3 ca , -3
C t3 04 4J CM
CO 3 -D 3 CD -H CJ
u co >-w 0 4J CT U
CO O ^^ C ^J U3 O
S jj cu co c a) M-4
a) o c •upvc JJ
""


















N.
w
-_
a*
09
f^
O
ii o S .2 o Q- "** ^! § . \rt
ui^;uo.>*-i-^«c,4j ' { s.
C 1-1 Oi 00) crO 0 X jfl
O Q ^^ C^ Cl« Ci) Z CJ co ^H
n
-'••^

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

kFORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HO  OANR    MEDIA:  Air
  Emission Standards and Technology Assessment
                                                                 APPRO:  A&c
  B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The major objectives of  this decision unit are (1)  the setting  of  new
  source performance standards  (NSPS),  their periodic review and revision,
  and (2)  the setting of  national emission standards  for hazardous  air pollu-
  tants (NESHAP).   NSPS  identify minimum  acceptable national Best Available
  Control  Technology (BACT)  and provide uniform guidance on alternative control
  technologies,  thereby  significantly  reducing State  and regional resources
  otherwise  required for  an estimated  4600 annual case-by-case BACT determina-
  tions.   A  secondary objective of the decision unit  is  to make available
  information on Reasonably Available  Control Techniques (RACT)  applicable to
  stationary sources of  air pollution  for consideration  by the States  in
  developing control strategies for incorporation in  implementation plans.

  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       New Source  Performance Standards for petroleum storage tanks, steam
  electric power plants,  glass  manufacturing, nonmetallic mineral processing,
  selected sources in refineries,  and  bulk terminals  were proposed.
  Regulations for  sewage  sludge incinerators, kraft pulp mills,  lignite
  fired steam generators,  sulfur recovery plants in petroleum refineries,
  grain elevators,  lime plants,  stationary gas turbines,  and steam  electric
  power plants were promulgated.   A guidance document concerning the lowest
  achievable emission rate was  issued  for comment.  As required by  the Clean
  Air Act, a list  of major source categories (to be regulated by NSPS)  was
  developed  and  proposed  in the Federal.Register.   Guidelines defining
  reasonable available control  technology were issued for 15 source
  categories.  Also,  studies to  determine  if existing  NSPS  need to be revised
  were  initiated for 10 source  categories.  The asbestos  NESHAP was  revised
  to control the use of asbestos-containing decorative sprays.   The vinyl
  chloride amendment"was  finalized.  Regulations to control benzene emissions
  from  bulk  terminals  and selected refinery sources was  published for  comment.
  Regulations to control  hazardous emissions from coke ovens were proposed
  for comment. Engineering guidelines  to  implement  Section lll(d) were finalized
  for sulfuric acid  plants and  proposed for kraft pulp mills.

  D)  FY 79  PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       The 1979  Program provides  for promulgation of  three NSPS;  proposal of
  nine  NESHAP and  seven NSPS  and  development work on  seven additional  NESHAP
  and 33 additional  NSPS.   The  NSPS  development work  includes the maj-or pro-
  gram  for the synthetic  organic  chemical manufacturing  industry (SOCMI).
  Screening  studies  will  be undertaken on up to 10  potentially major organic
  solvent  source categories  not  contained on the promulgated "list."   Review
  of  six and revision  of  two  existing NSPS  will be  undertaken.   Three  Section
  lll(d) guidelines  will  be developed.  Three control technique documents will
  be  developed,  and  control  technique  guidelines documents will be  developed for
  two petroleum  categories,  three  solvent-use categories,  100 organic  chemical
  process  sources, and synthetic  organic  chemical manufacturing fugitive  losses,
  secondary  sources, and  storage  and handling.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

   :iSION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
   1  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       M£DIA|  AIR
   STDS &  TECHNLGY ASSESStlNCl  EIS PREPAPPROj  A  & C
  "* ""•••• •••••'••'•>•••••••••••••••«•••»•••••«»••••••• — »m»mmm m m • m m m •»••
  E  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79 C. E.   FY  80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
  SITIONS   PFT         lij.o        121.0           91,0          91,0
            °PFT           8.0         13.0           10.0          10.0
             FT^                      139.5          120.3         120.3
  AUTH. (000.0)     9,410,0    15,975.3      1«,231.5     ia,231.5
  Ion and  Benefits           "

  ilopment of NSPS and NESHAP involves screening studies to charac-
  le  growth, emissions, processes and control technologies employed
  dustry;  emission tests of best controlled sources; analysis of
  alternatives; development and adaptation of reference test methods;
  it  of  the applicability of contiaaimis monitors; cost assessments;
  omic impact analyses.  These studies: are published in a Standards
  Environmental Impact Statement {&5EIS} which accompanies the pro-
   each  standard.  On the average it takes three years from the
  n of a screening study to the proBttlgation of a standard.  The
  f standards promulgated in any one year will be approximately 1/3
  otal number of standards under dsaelopment (excluding litigation).
  , level  1 funding will, on the soerage, result in promulgation of
  S per  year.  At this rate, all isajor source categories would be
  by  NSPS  in approximately 8 years,  or 4 years beyond the final date
  ihed by the CAA amendments.

 scifically,  funding at this level  provides for promulgation of NESHAP
 ibestos source categories, arsenic  for copper smelters and 9 benzene
 :ategories; and NSPS for phosphate  rock, carbon black, internal corn-
  engines,  sulfur recovery for oil and natural gas fields, organic
  degreasing, lead battery, non-metallic minerals, organic chemicals,
  and handling, and auto surface coating.  Emission testing for
 .ate matter will include quantification of inhalable fractions.
 lal  NESHAP  will be proposed for 3 coke oven sources.  NSPS will be
 1  for 14  additional categories of najor sources.  Control technique
 :s (CTDs)  will be revised for SO and particulate matter.  The
 .ate matter CTD will include analysis of small particle particulate
 of Not Funding This Level

 t funding this level will eliminate EPA programs directed at hazar-
 r pollutants and national standards of performance for major new
   Activity in both of these areas is mandated by the Clean Air Act.
 case of NESHAP, EPA would be forced to neglect the responsibility for
 ion of health.  Dropping the NSPS program will result in:  case-by-case
 terminations being made with inadequate support, and resultant
 ed litigation;  the likelihood of Hide State-to-State inconsistencies
 determinations and the potential for State-to-state competition for
•y based on differing BACT requireaents and resultant economic in-
:s; significant increases in States manpower required for BACT reviews
. manpower for oversight/audit of State BACT determinations.  In the
s of enormous increases in such manpower, many of the estimated 4600

 0-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
EMISSION STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (A205)
 Continuation
                                                  REG.
                                                                MED|A  Air

                                                                APPRO: A&C
     nciOUKCE SUMMAY
                              FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
                                                                     FY 80 CUM.
   LEVEL
 01  nf  06
	OF	
               POSITIONS
                          PFT
                           OPFT
                            FTE
              BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  annual  BACT determinations will be made  essentially without review and  the
  level of BACT will be determined by  the  sources.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2t DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE          HQ      MEDIAf  AIR
A205  EMISS  STDS &  TECHNLGY  ASSESSCINCL  EI8 PREPAPPROf  A i C
V tf V ** •••••• 9 •} V V • V • • • V • •! ip Mt • W • • • ••• • <• • •• • M • MM A^ ^ M M ^ • • IP ^M ^ ^ ^ IM^ ^ ^^ ^K^ ^ ^ ^^^B^^ ^
B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 8Q  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        111.0        121.0          18.0         109,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          8.0         13.0           5.0          13,0
02  °F  06            FTE                      139,5  -       13,2         133,5
    BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)     9,410.0    15,975,3      2,8«fe.3     17,077,8
   Description and Benefits          -  '

        Funding this level provides for further development and proposal  of:
   (1)  NESHAP for 3 additional hazardous pollutants: vinylidene chloride,
   ehtylene  dichloride, and acrylonitrile; and (2) NSPS covering 5 additional
   source categories: industrial  surface coating (coil), refinery heaters,
   vegetable oil, textile processing, and steel foundry NSPS.  Control  technique
   guidelines (CTG) documents will be produced for 100 synthetic organic  chemical
   processes and NSPS-SSEIS development initiated for asphalt roofing,  dry
   cleaning, and coal gasification.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Not  funding this level eliminates NESHAP for the three identified
   hazardous pollutants.  This will likely result in litigation and will  result
   in adverse health impacts. Not funding NSPS at this level increases the
   .adverse-impacts^ which result ^f r.om^the_aosence^ of, national BACT specifications
   and guidance which would be produced at this level.  It also will result  in
   the inability to produce CTG documents and increases difficulty in regulation
   of these  sources under SIP.
         J12
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HO       MEDIA|  AIR
A205  EMISS  STDS &  TECHNLGY ASSESSCINCL  EI8 PREPAPPROi  A 4  C
	__	—	_	_»,	_^ — _^^_ —•,— — • — — — — —.— ^-.•^•••^•^••^^•^•••.•^^•••••••aa^aK^
flP •• 


-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE         HQ
A205  EMISS STDS &  TECHNLGY  ASSESSCINCL EIS PREPAPPROt A  & C
B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78
         POSITIONS  PFT        111.0         121.0                      121  0
 «VEl              OPFT          8.0          ,30                       15.0
06 OP  06      •      FTE                      n9;s                      iJi  j
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)    9,410.0     15,975.3     13,000.0     30,975.3
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits

         The 1977 CAA  amendments require  EPA  to "list" by August, 1978, all
    major source categories for which NSPS have not been set,  and to promulgate
    standards for these  source categories by  August, 1982.   Funding at this
    level provides for the initiation of  standards development projects for
    all  remaining sources on  this list.  Only by beginning work in 1980 on the
    standards support  and environmental impact statement documents will it be
    possible to promulgate.NSPS for all categories of major sources by 1982.
    Also, at this level, revision of two  additional NSPS will  be undertaken.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         Not funding this level will prevent  meeting the CAA mandate that NSPS
    -be-promulgated for—all-major source-categories by 1982. This will delay
    the  associated BACT  guidance, with the attendant adverse impacts on State
    and  regional office  resources.
            JloJ
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------

























o
z
UJ
cs
<
>-
2 C£
C <
1-4 r
-i- 3-
U 3
UJ tO
O UJ
c u
O>- tt
-I 0
< CO
F"" UJ
Z (X
UJ
Z F-
•z. —>
o z
a: 3
> Z
z o
UJ •—
to
to •->
UJ LJ
F- UJ
« C
to ••
Ft
o
UJ i »•«
i- or o.
z u. a
3 Q.

CO
*-
UJ
u
z
^*
to
U.1
to
co
Z «I
c
M >•
*- IS
< —1
•— ~z
C X
F*
^
UJ
to to
••* o
o «-
z to

fc CO
££ tO
•-< »-»
•c r
UJ
«£ lf>
C
F- (\J
M •<





CC
o



Ft
CC
O *••
~« to
Ud
<
Z
^~
 -•
— z
z
4
_1
a.
^



CC
c-
^*







UJ
o *—
et <
57" — f
T"
3
U


•-
UJ
e z
CC UJ
c- a:
«-• LJ
z




F-
C* UJ
F—
«r tt
— a
3



_1
F- 3
c- t—
— <_)
<
























IP «f

— C
Ft O
ru a
a t-.

IP 51
» *
«- O
K> C<
nj 9
o r*.
^
IP S»
* *
— O
fO O
rv Q
«. *.
9 !*»•
^*


IT 3
• •
— O
K. 0
ru =r
*.  eo ^ o o- — • rv
f\j K>  cr ~
^ IM -* r^
^M •—




in o tr» ^ c o f>
— >*>  y O ^ *-" f\J
(VJ »O «0 5T —
«. . « *  c?-
r^ ^ — ^ o ru ^* »*i
O" v« C ^ «~ *•
*.  K> r\j «
— —.


C O O (M O O
0 f\t CC *^ -* ff
— & ~« o- —
531 O K> £D —
* * * *
O- Kl ^ 3




^
O
O .—
*•*; *— Ik. UJ
^> w- _J ^ u_ Q. »-
e < o c. c u.
• LU Cl O •»-* *— '
U. I « 3 O
o ^ ^ s •* •»
D O *= *- CC
— <. x tr z
o »>- so o
H- Z X >- »-»
_l UJ •- UJ < »-
> C >~ CO
UJ ID Z? C-
_j cc o a


 CO O »" Ft
0 CC -" CO — -"
r- ru a eo
••* v*




Ft O Ft -- O O AJ
« IP — 0 CC Ft Ft
sr o IP eo — —
SO 5T *t ^
^ ^ ^
rv ru —





F*I o Ft ru o o u\
IP — 5J F- — Ft t>
F-~ -o — o ru — Ft
O- •- CC Ft — —
« « » «
IT Ft l\! CC
** —


o o o ru o o
o ru cc Ft -* ec
-< o — a —
W O Ft CO —
» « » »
O- Ft -D a




O
O
0 t—
~ ~*^ I iP ••
3 0 < — tO
ru < X or z
o •- to o

_) UJ —« UJ < »-
> O »— to
UJ 3 3 O
-jer CQ.


Ft «V

in »^-

o- cc
 4>
0* CO
CC C-
"
Kt «\J
• •
IP f-
r- -o
o- cc
^ »
cc O-
va


Ft ru
• •
IP r^
F>~ ^
0- CC
^ «
co cr
»*




rt o Ft ru c o a
in r~ co F-- — IP ru
p^ iO O ^ fU *• 9
O- •" CO CC ~ —
CD ft IP C-
VH w*




IP 0 IP f- O 0 C-
F^ o-  — o- —
IT 0 Ft CD —
* * * ^
O*- Ft «C 5T




O
0
0 )-
«* F- U- UJ
•O •* _i r* U. a •-
e < o D. o u.
• UJ K G ^/ ^^
u. X to 3 ss
O ^" 3 z ^ ••
3 O « »«• tO
Ft < X ££ Z
C F- tO O
F— Z X >- *•!
—I UJ •- UJ < r-
> c •— to
UJ 3 3 C
_/IE oa


Ft ru

IP »^
f~ O
o- —
O X
Ft —
Ft ru
• •
IP r-
f- 0
o- —
o -c
Ft —
Ft 1M
• •
4P F>-
t~ O
o •*
» fc
o -c
Ft —


Ft ru
• •
IP r^
r* o
o -*
* »
0 -C
Ft —




Ft c Ft ru o o a
in F^ eo F^ ~ IP ru
F- *> o o ru — si
o- — co — — —
o ft r». -G
Ft ru »—




o o o
C O 0
o o sr
O O (M
« ^ «
ru rtj «
•™ «"




rt o Ft ru o o IP
IP — St F~ — Ft O-
r* .c — o AI »- Ft
O- -^ CC Ft — • —
^ » * ^
IP Ft CVICC
•M *^


o o o ru o o
o ru eo t — co
^ (^ «M O" WM
51 O Ft CC —
» » •. ^
O Ft ^ 5T




- _j.~ u. a »-
0 « 0 0. O U.
• uj a o *-• +*
u. X to 3 C
C i- 3 Z M —
3 C «t «-. to
•o - to o
^ z >c >- »-*
_) UJ — UJ < F-
u_' tr ^^ ^^ _i ~
> c F- tr;
UJ 3 3O
-Iff O O.
r^
1
Ft
1
o-
o





















































































01,1




-------
     Z
     LU
     o
     UJ
     H
     o
     CC
     0.
     H-
     2 >
     LU cc

     11
     o i
     LU
Jl'^
       to
       O
       U
       o
       2
       D

       Z
       O

       CO

       O
       LU
       O
       "CE
       O
       u_


Vj U
•H <-S
*^ ^5
f.*
< o
O ft
LU CL
S <






03
o

O
O LU








^S
LO
o
04
5
4-1
C
0}
5
tn
CO
0)
tn
to


^i
00
0
t-i
— • o
UJ £-
Q ^
O '-J
U_0)
z-o
< c
— cd
LU
-i to
HT3
11
DECISION*
ission St
a




tn
r**
z
LU
Z
v>
3
Q.
5
o
o
o

H
_J
D
S

O
§
o
*••
u.




en
£
^
u.



00
CD


^»
U.






I
c

I
c
L
•
0
L

|
f
1
|
1
1
i
«
'<
<
t

t

1
UJ
LU
J
UJ

LU


1
^
_J
UJ
^
vu
_l
j
LU
^
LU
-1
d
LU
UJ
_J
4
n i

LU

O
oc
eu


LU
H-
S

}••
c^
LU






LI
r
3
n
i
J

3
u
j


2
J
>
E
/5
J
i.
E
j
j
a:

n















.

CO H iH  ai co
ID «H C tO iJ
0) tu u o tn 0) c
C O -H — 1 0) 00 t8
CO ^ O &0 ^ ^ ^5 ^^
L^ [ij M 3 3 O V^ fi-t &0
J2 C &^ fe i«Q M O CO C
^5 ^ ^ *^ ^ 0| ^J ^J r^ C/) U •!— )
C/5 lr^ O rQ ^ VH W *T3 V3 CJ CO ^yj tj bO
Q !Z2 M 03 ^ D -W *T*^ ^H ^J W ^tt O Vi
QSl t-J 3^ QJiJiJW i-tCQ"0^ O OJtJCO
^C ^« O * *^ ^"^ ^™> *^ 5 ^> CJ C O D"" h^ O ^C
>o f*^ {ft o£ ^j ^) QJ C-3 D j^ *rH cO ^0 O W ^J
^|I ^1 CD GJ ^1 to VD 3J U5 ^^ O Ofi ^N f\4 O I ^»
L^ 05 CJ ^^^^ t4 3 Ci ^*> r^ C W "***» O ^"i M
yjM -H OCyiJU-HWOO-HO) -U QP3O
cu-i 6
1—13 Cl-iO !-iOOO^! cfl-HWO) CX
C/3O 0) O >H MOiUCJO XfuSOS O 	
cna T300C i— 1 to to to
H (si IH o) oi c •• •• taccc
WM C 3 BJ !-i i-l OOOOO) 0)010)01 0> >>>
^ O Ota W UJ-i^-rlC CCCC Q OOO
<;'** AJ cu oc o) 0) o) o) N NNNN tucuo)
zc^ ca LJ M ^D-Qtncnc cccc -K ^^^d
OO M JS 3 10 10 »j l-i 0) 010)0)0) W OOO
Mfe 1-1 H 6 
-------
o

UJ
2
O

h-
U
ai
H
O
CC
a.
>  °°
Z  oo
UJH

    UJ


    X
    00
    O
    O
    u
   O

   oo

   O
   ai
   O
   'a:
   o


u u
•H 
r-






o>
2
^
u.



CO
o>

^
u.







i
Q
o
<
u
«:
<
U
r"
H
H
l.
•s
£
3
u
Q
•5
tf
C
c.
<
0

Ul
Ul


_l
Ul

Ul
_J
J
-1
Ul
Ul
_l
-j
_1
UJ
Ul




UJ
UJ
j
Ul
>
Ul

o
cc
a.


Ul
^
5
?
co
Ul







J
•
3
i
£
j
i
3
j
j
»
]
•
i
j
*
j
;
C
3























i— IrHr-lt— 1 rt i— 1 ^| ^| rH r- 1 r-( rH r- 1 ,-lr-HiHr^i— 1















r_f
«B
u,
3
4J
CO
Z T3 0)
C •• O .. .. x-v >» 60

CC C«-4 r-ICC>«5
Cd-H 0)i-IU Cfl-rli-l'H'O CO
W 604J3 CQJJJJ4-IS COCOCO
iHcrJ (fltOCO OtScfl-HO 0) M l-i
•H -ijin)3g
rH O ClO cd C 60 rC TJ 
-------
     O

     UJ
     a
     o
     UJ

     o
     cc
     a.

     0
     si
     ui
ui;
CO
h-
Z
UJ


I
CO
       O
       O
       O
       K

       Z
       g

       Crt

       5
       UJ
       Q
'cc
O
u.


jj u
•H ^Q


.. D-'
< O
2-
"J a.
5 <




1
0
O LU
X CC










^^
"m
o
<

e
at
s
CO
D
to
en
^
oo
o
»— i
£g
Q.C
O y
U 0)
0^
Z-0
< c
a
HI
-1 CO
DECISION UNIT TIT
lission Standard

^w





CO
t-
^^
UJ
2
I
(A
I]
CL
S
0
u
o

5

S
CD
>





O)
O
T™
^-
u.


CO
o>
*~
^
u.



u
c
c
<
u
^
u
p
h
h
u
^
c:
a
0
Q
^
«
C
c.
t
<

c

1
-I
LU
LU


,J
UJ
^_
UJ


J
^1
_J
LU
^
UJ
-1
-j
LU
LU
_J

j
UJ
LU
j
LU
>
UJ

•S
O
c
a.

LU
^
s

V)
LU



J
t
r>
J
S
j
J
*
j
•
5
j
.
f
5
j
t

Q

























WrHi-trHt-lrHOOOO O rHOO O O















to u
-1 C

y s o
C * -H C. -H |
•S e° § ° ^ ;^
*J C i-l £, Q) u O
y o -u o > < f2
T3 4J ft, o U Q
o y < u -H ....
^ 3 fc3 C crt to CO
o-cos T3ooa) to wee
c^j3 oeiy M CW-H-H
i"(J-l'H -H MCUtnWU-l 4-1 OOO-H C/3 CO OJ
4-ito-H E a) coalesce c 4->^-.e2(2
yco 3 4J i— i a) 1-1 3 c cu y-H CB >,
3OM rH60idi-IUhC/3iH E i-l>4-i60y *Q T3 T3
*o ja 4-i 4J  e-ucj« so ucur-i
"tosoiue eu-Hi-ito-H Q wrto i-t s'tos^1
«-H3LiOT)i-ta)4-ia)3o jz w e P,a)P.4J
ooe.ca)oajcua)-ue M ocoi-io ai 'o o "
to y
CO CO













































Furnace
y
— t-i
" <
w U
2 M
^ JJ
2 y
•» aj
11
^ *"
^
Q.
U

-------
o
z
UJ
a
o
in
i-
o
CE
CL.
uj Q:

II
il
  V3
  UJ
  2
  X
  CO
  O
  O
  U
  O

  C/3

  U
  UJ
  G
  'CC
  O
  LL



M U
•*•$ (•£}
.
u.





CD
<^"
U.
co
o


u.



u
c
z
<
u
c
«
0
L
H
H
t
«
u
«;
c
Q
«:
^
c
c.
c.
<
a
1
UJ
UJ

J

LU

LU


J

UJ
^
LU
d
UJ
>
LU
-1
i
• *4
i
UJ
>
UJ
J
j
UJ
LU
O
CC
a.
LU
5
~
c/>
LU



j
3
»
C
•
5
J
j
•
j
5
j

)
j
j
C
3


















 3
c ^
4) X VJ en
o M CL, 0) J
•H X 2 O 4J -0 o
r-l 4J < U 03 MH 3
o o3coo.^ -H
Cl~" (— ' r* r* i^ • 7j . ^ ^^ ""^ ^^
Ui WMMM CU3 HwO) 00 Cd M O
03 03CXO)0)0) a)fl) 034JCOOO <0-HO 00-H i-l COtfllUC fflC (DC
o)-HO)n3(U(i)iiia)T^toa3TH •aa3iH(i)o4-iooa)4-i'(ji-iE60t8-H!at0Js
^"^^gffSM^ooiDo-H^jjrowpdw-otustj^ctBXo
rrlo::r^s:'^7!'^7jia:: S 5*5 ? ^ « ^ 5 ^T3J 03 3C O.JD-H 1 to V- to
O O OOOO -r-I^SLj nj )_i X i— 1C c Oi-tX-HLiStOO4-)
PM eu cLiCucL,!^ SHSU >(XicncL,M M pncoe>fKW
-------
     o
     z
     UJ
     o
     o
     LU
     I-
     o
     cr
     a.
     II
       LU

       2

       X
       O
       CJ
       U
       D

       Z

       O
       o
       LU

       Q
       c.


Ulc 3o

L* U
1— fl i£
<^«
^i

• • CL
< O
Q £
S <



1
O

O LU
I C










u-i
0
CN
•^
C
Ol
E
CO
w
Ol
ffl
^

>v
M
Q
i— i
CODE)
Techno
i-S
-i r-i 01 C/3 0) W r-l tH
C30) O cflOl4J*j a<4-l
o) *HOO> 3*oS(— ^ojr-ioi u
T3 .. 604Jr-l > 01 OIC CO 0)4JO)4JSC3
•H -a CCOM-I -H co a era EtCEtoso-o
3 OCC-OQ i-l t-( 3 MC/5 0) 3 3-rtjJW
o < 1-1 -H >% -o -a o c a. oo-aoEcacM
rH NU-IJSTJ "O 3 C/2 -HOI O. C-HCB-H3U
ft, CJ 01OIO1 < 4-1 4JO OT3-H4JO)4Jr-l5x
•HXOiQO>4J co ^ mC OiJ!S5S-iJiJ<;D.O
Ct-iLj feco) o-Hrt rttflcdoir-i
T3LjOOn)U-il-i4JCO D S 0)1-1 l-IC/Jl-lfC'HCrJi-l'cCM
•^ 01 *C QJ W i— 1 COlcQ Ot 0) *HO1 Lj M )-l MOO)
CJ Ol
co pi
- - -












































a
CO
o
E
o
U.
a.
LU

-------
o
z
LU
O
O
LU
H
o
CC
a.
si
UJ
CO
H
z
LU

X
to
  O
  U
  u
  O

  C/3

  O
  UJ
  Q
  'CC
  o
  LL


U U
•H t£
• • Q.
< O
— CC
CL
UJ CL
2 <



0
_ d
O uj
I CC








	




£*•
L/")
C
^

( i
c
01
S
co
CO
0)
en
CC
;>
CJ
o
!— I
~ O
UJ C
Q Si
0 ^
o«
<1
— to
UJ
A DECISION UNIT TITL
Emission Standards



CO
z
UJ
S
I
to
13
Q.
o
u
o
w
-J
3
s


§
O)
^.
u.





U'
LU
_J
_J
UJ
UJ
_1

cj
LU
^^
UJ
_J
UJ
UJ
J


1
UJ

UJ
H
UJ

UJ
_J
O)

52 ~>

> CC
u. a.

UJ

GO rf
?I
> e/>
U. UJ



UJ
CC
HiHi-l
iH





iH i-( •-( 0 OOOOO 0 .-(r-t^H
i— 1


OOOO OOOOO o iHiHr-l
^














CO "
0) CO
•r^ 0)
W C
w o -H
O ofl-o
C/2 Orf 0) J-i s—^
H  3 CD en
Z Q rO » ^ Ja C "*. OJWOUS T3C04J 4J
z<4-ioooicn r-iOiH 52 cuiHcn en
O B rH r- ( i— I 0) >% 14-1 ,C to O T-ICX3 Jii3
MCOO)£OI^=P^-H JJOOOlfn 14-IJ3 0^
ws e OTHO.C -a 4jjj a IM os •^ME o^E
C/3O a-r-l-H 4-1 3J-I CUO !•<«-( W 4JOIQ eScJO
MQ 0 QMOJO) 4-;C Or-lE^J-H fc CScJ C «CJ
SOSiH 4JCOCOO) MJLjaiaj 01 O O 0)i-l
W<: 0) 01-HOll-i E OUOHC td G -O O. H -H 4J«rH
N > CC-OO M a r-4. 14-1 OJU O— 1 CO 4J cB to
^^ ^ ^^^^ 5^ .Cr-tOC-U ai ^ C . S ro j?CB
*^K Q ' — 1 r- i i— 1 .C i-li— 1 CJI^LjOiH ^ 4J ^D«U 00 CLOU
S ^ *,„ >->^^u so) ij:o^c o « ooo) ^H cnxJO)
OSi C/5 J3MCS-I 0)> -H4JiHMO W 00 C-4J 3 OM4-I
MO M 4JCJ-HO) 0101 Moi^tO -H 3o)C S ^fflC
Hta W W<>PM UQ HSOUCN 3 4J H^-H O ScjM
ZCO CO ZiJ PL, ^ , . ,

























u
c
0)
- E
0)
4J
2
CO
4-1
o
cB
a.
M

r-H
cB
c
u
E
c
o
•H
c
&J
T3
cfl
4J
t-l
PA Form 2410-12(8-78)
* Standards Suppo
111

-------
o
Z
01
a
<

2
g
H
a
Ul
H
o
cc
a.
ED
>  «
Z  CO
UJ  I-

    UJ


    X
    CO
    o
    CJ
    Z
    g
    CO

    6
    UJ
    o
    O
    u.


1-1 a
•H <^J
< <


.. a.'
< 0
O §•
5 <




1
0



O oi
X CE













^^
m
o
CN

OJ
C
01
£
CO
en
01
to
to

ec
o
rH
£g
S-=
O o
U CU
QH
2-0
< G
~- «
at
_J CO
I--0
DECISION UNIT Tl
ission Standar
g

*~
^»
o.




j
01
Ol

1
1

01
^
01
~*

-
-f
Ol
>
Ol
—I
H
— 1
Ol
^
01
1
*Nfl
T
_J
01
01
A
Ol
>
Ol
en
5 -,-
*" O
> C
u. a.


01
CO <
G> 2

H*

O. Ol




01
Q;
W5
<
Ol
2
°3
01
_j

«•
^
i—
ACCOMPLISHMEN

CD











o
. , 0
<• rH rH fs|


O
o
CM rH r-l CM




O
_, o
rH rH rH ,H


rH rH rH Q


















o so
r-i CJ c
CJ -H -H
•u LI
1 ® 3
CO .£ u
01 -O CO CO U CJ
O MH W 4>C«'
3WT>a l-l toco's
o -a c s j cu c
cftWcoS W Oucfl
^«-uu o OOE
3T3C/2O H Mn-i
cu c a ij 3 PM H
Z C3 CU 01 O co crj
iJ CJ CO JJ rH JJ rj
oow rjw u fa s~> « M^I
C 33 CUcdPcj CJ OB
•HCU o cr -OS CXH -H o.dj
4->U W M -H MCJ E CU^
(OC Z X01 Z^ 0) (JUto
•HCO 333OiJJE J2 CU'
^ £ CU CJ *H Cd CJ CO O "7J G CO
WW Z W QrH FdH OI-HCO
O H 3HZCJ4JCOI
a»<*-i cu MCJ w-Haicdu
COM CO rJ 3-H fJ2 C rHOOO
•HCU -H o «-itJ oS cs a^u
?P-I > oi rHi-i ciu an SOD.
CU 0)H3fdHOMo
C3 Z CO fX, ZQ 0 CJ

U CJ























































0
C9
CN
I
O
E
5
a.
^
a.
UJ

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  OANR     MEDIA: Air
 Energy and Pollutant Strategy Development  (A210)    „
                                                    REG.         APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
      The objectives of this Decision Unit include the development of approp-
 riate recommendations as to the need for control of specific pollutants,  the
 review and development of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
 the analysis of energy and economic impacts of air pollution controls
 and the analysis of the  implications of energy-related developments  on air
 quality.
  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
      Preliminary screening of some 700 organic chemicals as potential air
 contaminants was continued.  Those chemicals determined to be of special
 concern were further assessed to establish the need for regulatory action.

      A National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for lead was proposed.
 Determinations^as jto,Jthe__neeji fjir.controJ—ojLjarsjsnic,. PQK^_and cadmium were
 made..,, ,and thejaeed for_a,JJAAQS_for _sho_rt^±era__expjasures_aLjiitrogeni_d±oxide
 was assessed.

      A review and proposal of a revised NAAQS for photochemical oxidants was
 completed.   A review of the current NAAQS for nitrogen dioxide and carbon
 monoxide was initiated.

  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
      A major focus will be assessment of the need to revise the NAAQS for
 particulates and SC>2.   Related issues such as the possible establishment of
 an inhalable particulate standard will be addressed in the review of these
 pollutants.   In addition a short-term NO  air quality standard will be
 promulgated.  Recommendations will be maae as to the need to revise the
 annual NO   air quality standard,  and the CO air quality standard.  A second
 major empRasis will be to continue the work in the area of toxic or hazardous
 air pollutants.   This  work will concentrate on individual assessments of
 pollutants  receiving high priority as a result of the review process
 performed in prior years.   Specifically,  the program will provide analytic
 assessments  of benzene,  arsenic,  and coke ovens,  POM,  cadmium, acrylonitrile,
 ethylene dichloride, perchlorethylene,  and vinylidene chloride as
 potential hazardous air pollutants under Section 112;  and will complete
 a  preliminary classification of approximately 40 high volume organic chemicals.

      In the  energy areas,  studies,  policy recommendations,  and programmatic
 actions  pertinent  to the relationship between fossil fuel combustion and air
 quality requirements will  be carried out.   Such  actions include support for
 promulgation of  visibility regulations;  maintenance of  the energy and en-
 vironmental  data base  for  analysis of the impact  of regulations on utility ., - .
                                                                          U10
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HQ OANR     MEDIAiAir
 Energy and Pollutant Strategies Development (A210)
   (continuation)                                     REG.         APPRO:A&C
 FY. .79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION       -

 boilers and other fuel burning sources;  analyses  of  the impact  of  coal  sulfur
 variability (CSV) on compliance with current  NSPS for utility boilers,  (in-
 cludes defining the key issues, and developing alternatives for effecting
 compliance);  maintenance of data on utility expansion plans and analyses with
 respect to impact on PSD increments, ability  to meet NSPS,  increase in  SO
 emissions, and the impact of EPA policies  on  utility growth;  and analyses of
 the environmental impact of business and consumer practices which  negatively
 impact control programs, (e.g., fuel switching, malmaintenance, various gaso-
 line additives programs, and control device performance variability).
EPA Fora 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2» DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
                  —              — — ———^ — j.-^— gp — ^jp^jpjF^m^j^^^^jfr^^^^jp^^g^^^nyaidi
A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE^AND  CODE          HQ       HEDIA| AIR
AZ10  ENERG  & POLUTNT  STRATEGIES  DEVL CINCt EIS APPROj A  & C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C,  E.  FY  80 INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         aa.o         42.o         32,0         12,0
 LEVEL              OPFT      .    5.0          9.0          7.0           7.0
01  OF 05             FTE                       54.8         47.0         «7.0
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     2*786.0      2,540.0      1*905,0      1*905,0
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Description and Benefits
       The activities,  which are  conducted primarily in-house with some con-
  tracts support, involve collection  and  review of data on effects of air
  pollutants, analyses  of potential effects and emissions of pollutants,
  development of methodologies  appropriate for the analysis of pollutant  effects
  and the determination of appropriate control requirements, development  of
  recommendations for control,  preparation of analyses and documentation
  requisite for rulemaking (i.e.,  economic analysis), and maintenance and use
  for analyses of an energy-related data  base.

       Funding at this  level will  assure  promulgation of revised NAAQS for SO.
  and particulates if required.   This, will mean that the standards will be
  revised or reissued in light  of  latest  evidence to more adequately protect
  public health.  Promulgation  of  these standards includes criteria document
  development and- analysis-of -attainment-strategies;~ analysis of the energy,
  environmental and economic impacts  for  alternative standards; development  of
  the preamble and regulation documents for proposal; insuring adequate public
  participation through meetings  and  hearings;.receiving and responding to
  all public comments;  and developing the documents for promulgation.

       At this level, the activities  associated with assuring the public  is
  being protected against unacceptable exposures to carcinogens in the air
  involves:  preparing health input to permit a decision on possible NESHAPs  for
  acrylonitrile, ethylene dichloride, perchoroethylene, and vinylidene chloride
  and completing preliminary risk  assessments for 20 chemicals. (Assessments will
  be done by ORD with major  involvement from OANR to provide the best exposure
  estimates.)

       Funding at this  level will  also provide identification of the extent
  and magnitude of problems  in  emission-limiting regulations, continuous
  monitoring requirements,  and  plant  siting decisions during NSR, associated
  with the variability  of the sulfur  content of coal.  In addition, the con-
  tinued maintenance of an energy  data base will permit analysis of the impact
  of environmental regulations  on  fuel-burning sources.

  Impact of  Not Funding This Level
       Not funding at  this  level would eliminate EPA's program to review ambient
  air quality standards which  is required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of
  1977.   It would also eliminate major regulatory effort aimed at reducing
  carcinogens in the air.   The Agency would not be adequately protecting the
  public health if this level  of funding was denied.  Moreover no capability.^ ,
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ OANR     MEDIA: Air
 Energy and Pollutant Strategies Development (A210)
  (Continuation)                        v            REG.         APPRO: A&C
  8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.   FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
01 05
	 OF 	

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)












V



  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

 to assess the energy/environmental interface,  as required by the CAA,
 would exist.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2J DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAj  AIR
A2io  ENERG & POLUTNT STRATEGIES  DEVL  CINCL EIS APPPOJ  A &  c

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C,  E,  FY  §0  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         42,0         42.0          6,0         38,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          5.0          9,0          2.0          9.0
02 OF  05             FT£                       54,8          5,8         52.8
   BUDGET AUTH, (000.0)     2.786.0      2,540,0        381,0     2.286,0
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Description and Benefits
      Funding at this level will allow the Agency  to complete preliminary  risk
 assessments of 20 additional chemicals,  enabling  the Agency to augment  a
 priority list of chemicals for air regulatory decision-making on the basis
 of  their threat to public health.  Those presenting the greatest threat will
 be  selected for more detailed analysis.

      It also provides for coordination with the regional offices to explore
 opportunities for consistency in dealing with coal sulfur variability;  and
 developing and testing alternative approaches to  resolve problems which coal
 sulfur variability poses for emission limitations, continuous monitoring,
 and plant siting decisions under new sources review.  Thus, a better and
 more consistent approach for resolution of case-specific problems generated
 by  the inherent variability of the sulfur content of coal will be established.

 Impact of Not Funding This Level
      Not funding at this  level would not allow the Agency to complete the
  preliminary risk estimates  for the remaining 2'0 chemicals, the first step  in
  the regulatory process.   Not funding at this level would continue to leave
  the implementation of  EPA's regulatory program for major coal-burners open to
  a wide range of interpretations.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
" ^ * ^   ^ ™ ~™ W w w M • • W • w • • V • • V •* • • •• • • ^V9 V V V fli •• ^9 •• "• • *^ IV W • fl^ • AP •& • W • 9 • •• • W • • •
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HS       MCDJAt AIR
A210  ENERG  & POLUTNT STRATEGIES DEVL (INCL  EIS APPROi A 4 C
^™~ •   ^ ^^ ^^^^ w w vv w^^ • • 9 • • ^^ ^ 9 <• • • v & • • w ^ • * w W^B •• 9 • • w*^ w w ipv m ^ • •• • • • w • • •••
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C. E.  FY BO INCR    FY §0  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          42.0         42.0           4,0         «2,0
 LEVEL              OPFT      .     5.0           9.0           1,0          10.0
03 OF 05             FTE                       54.8           3,5         56.3
   BUDGET AUTH,  COOO.O)     2*786.0      2,540.0        25«,0      2,540,0
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Description and  Benefits
       Funding  at  this level allows the listing as hazardous of trichloroethy-
  lene and methyl-chloroform which may present a serious threat to public
  health.   This includes coordinating the detailed health risk assessments,
  conducting  the detailed exposure study, conducting the public participation
  program  for the  regulatory decision, facilitating Agency review of the
  decision, and publication of the listing as necessary in the Federal Register.
  Following listing, support is provided to the development of the NESHAP by
  assistance  at public hearing, risk assessments for determining required
  level of control, responding to public comments and preparing the portion
  of  the docket  dealing with the  hazardous  determination.

       It  will  also provide a coordinated,  widely-distributed set of written
  policies and  guidelines to solve CSV problems relative to emission regulations,
  continuous  monitoring requirements, and new source review decisions.  This
  includes revised regulations, enforcement guidelines, and technical guidelines
  as necessary  to  solve coal sulfur variability (CSV) problems relative to SIP
  SO- emission  limits and the consideration of.CSV in the new source review
  unaer PSD and NAAQS requirements.

  Impact of Not Funding This Level
       Not  funding this level would preclude  the Agency from regulating two
  hazardous pollutants which would result  in  inadequate protection of public
  health.   Not  funding this level also will limit resolution of CSV problems
  to at best an ad hoc basis, with limited dissemination, review, and
  coordination.
 EPA. Form 24'.0.11 (8-78)

-------




















«
UJ
ts
<
V-
2 a:
0  z
2 O
UJ — 1
to
to •-»
UJ O
« o
co — a.
KI u.
C CC
uj z: a.
1- IE
Z U. —
3 UJ

;3
Z
>
UJ

to
I1J
2 e
3 UJ
*- ^
< cr
c to
IT •-
2
•f H-
3
«o c
—• a
c
Z •£

*• O
a: a
•-, UJ
< 2
UJ
Mf
< C
v_
p- rv
(V <

s
cc
o-


0
O" ^^
— 05
UJ
H-
X
CO
UJ
r\j o
£ Z
o~ >-l
— z
Z

a

CC
o*






UJ
i-^
c fr-
ee <
o- _*
— Z)
2:
^
0



z
0 Z
cc uJ
a a:
z




^-
O- UJ
r»-
o- a
~" =
o
-J
^ 5
e t-
— LJ























O t*~
^ — _) r-~ U. DL >-
C < O CL O U.
• UJ cr & *•* v^
u. X CO 3 C
o — 3 r « -
3 o < «^ cr>
— < x a. z
c •- to o
*- 4^ X >- »-»
_1 UJ *- U.1 « l-
tlj O *-* N-* _l 1— t
> O t— S3
uJ 3 30
_i cr CD.
c a
•t a
CC ft
fu ru
ru —
o a
-c a
CO KI
ru ru
« «
ru —

o a
• •
-e> a
CC HI
ru ru

ru —

o a
-c a
CC Kt
ru rv
« ^
ru —



o m in a o o cc
-t> r^ eo a «c tr- A,
ffi r^ ^ fi fi in
ru —• — ru
» ^ ^ »
ru — — —





o in m f*- o o co
— ru co in -c Ai in
CO O- CO O
KI — • ^* ru






0 0 0 « O O CO
o o o — ru O" a
a * co i- a in
in ru ru KI
ru — -• —

c o o a c c
•o ru a a ru in
co in m o a
r~ ru in in
ru -« — —




.^*
c
o
 t— L. UJ
in ^ _i ~ u. a. •-
O < O CL C U.
• uj a: o «- v^
u. i - 1-1
_J UJ — U.' < •-
u.' CJ >- v^ _) — ,
> o •- er.
UJ 3 30
_l I 00.
c «
o ~«
a i^.
in 10
ru —
0 -D
O *«
a ^"
in KI
» *
ru -•

o «
• •
O -v
a F^~
in KI

ru x

o .c
o •-•
a h-
in KI
« «
ru —



e o o •« o o KI
O O «« ^« AI O *
a o- a f— a -* in
in ru ru K>
* « » »
Al -• — —





o in in A* o o in
a «• AI r~ a — K>
in ru K> Kt
ru » » »






0 O O * O O CO
o o o — A( o- a
a o cc r- a in
in ru ru KI
rv — — —

o o o a o o
o ru a a ru in
cc in KI o a
f* AI in tn
Al — — —




^^
o
c
W I- U. UJ
in «-* _j *•* u. o. ^~
c < c a. o u.
• UJ G; o *-* *^
u. I co 3 e
3 *— 3 Z ** ••
3 O « ^ to
KI < r CE Z
C »- CO O
>- Z X >- «
_) UJ •- UJ < •-
UJ & —• ^" -1 —
> c. t- to
UJ 3 3 C
_j 
-------
o
Z
LU
a
O
I-

LU
H-
o
CC
a.
_i
<

Z

    CC
    I
    I
    LU


    CO
    -J
    a.
    ^
    O
    U
    u



    H

    Z
    D

    Z
    O
    u
    LU
    a
   'CC
    o



to O
< <

.. a.'
< O
O n
LU a.
S <




*
0
d
O LU
X CC







^-^
0
iH
CN
'
C
0)
E
O.
o
I-l
01
CU
Q

CO
01
1-1
60
•— O!
LU jj
Q co
O i-i
O "

5*°
< C
"~ cfl
LU
-J 4J
t C
r- 3
1?
^ P^4
^-
X
CO 00
LU r-
O M

4





C/S
r-
Z
LU
X
CO

a.
O
U
U
at
P
D


S
a>
u_




•1
LU
LU
J
_]
LU
^^
UJ


1
1
LU
^
ai
d
UJ
LU
J
J
LU
LU
LU

LU
a> -j
"~ O
> cc
u. a.

LU
S <
n* p
01 1


> 00
U. LU





LU
CC
J
LU
^

LU
_J
h-

I"
L_
Z
LU
I
Ij
a.

O
U
O
^

ffi



•












i-t r-i t-4 r-( r-liHOO t-li-lOO i-Hi-IO



i-lr-lr-liH OOOO OOOO OOO


t-l iH iH iH OOOO OOOO OOO













I
0. ~" - - ..
o co

0) CO <•
> U C
0) i-l U CO O
•OS O ^S rH i-i
oi IH cu co a: CD j-t
>j£ 1)0) "O-r-IO T3C3
oo -o-ox I-IM-H -HP.CD
UH -H d) -ri -O OJSVJ EOSi-ll-lr-ICUS
~3- MCU 3 CM OT30) Cw O OCfl CC
U OCDO-M CUOi-H flj CUOr-l-HO 0)O
3 M r- 1 r-l i— i CO I— 1 U-4 f^ CO CJ r-H U-f ^ " 4-t v^ i— 1 4-1
c. o o) jr XJ2 xo cj xo u >-fS >->o
e<4-i r-i y js y cu xw co .c-3- J:M co cocu js to
•H *H »H4J 1-1 i-JOi-*'*-1 iJOW p , r? ^j Q
4J CO HT3CUCU 3 O>rHSi-l i-IW Oli— IS4J CJ CU i— 1 g
C _C Cw 4-* O C CO O pC H CU CO O O «C M ot O O •£- M
CU 4J< i-tCUwCU O MCJOAJ CUU-i UOC3-U -Hen S-iUO
g i— i zn ceo *o o. o ^H ** o ^H rH o ^
Cfl cOCfi O 0) r-l i-l X r^,-4OC en i-li-(OC J3W i-H r-l O
CD fl) W rH r-l £ r-l 01 JSXWO 014-1 £>>MC 3O XXS-i
cu jrz; xxcjx co yj;o^2 uc ujsoxi o, u-i y x: o
CD )-l£HC CUr-4 -H ij -H U COCU -H-Ui— IM -r-14-lr-H
CD OJ'H UJJCU-H 4JCO HCUJ3CO C£ t-lOlJICO J->S VJOJ^i
•< i-iO coajo.> ajo ugou *H in i->Suu UCB usu
cfl r-i -H -a CD 3 M

CDC soi ocn co
co ucu .... oj; .... oco .... o to ...
4-» pLig C04JCJT3 Ocj COX3OT3 L3C3 cOjac.J'O CJC- CO-QCJ

1
o
p- r-i CN n 
-------
U
Z
UJ
u
LU
r-
o
tr
a.
r-


LU  QT





    i
_  ID

>  «
2  W
LU  H-

    LU


    I
    CV3
    O
    O
    o
   3

   Z
   o
   LU

   Q
   CC
   O
   LL


M O
•H 4

.. oJ
< O
Q ?
UJ 0.
5 <





OS
O
C3
O LU








^— •
O
r™
CN
"""
4—
c
0
£
C
C
a
>
O)
O

CO
OJ
*r"
61
— 0)
LU 4J
Q cr.
O M
U •"
.» C/3
Z JJ
< C
— a
LU -U
-J 3
H r-l
H 'Q
Z -a
13 C
~9 CO
O >.
co «
O m
UJ f-
D t4
<





t-
Z
LU
I
CO

a.
5
O
U
o
LU
_J
3
5

§
O)
LL





1
LU
LU
-J
I
I
UJ

UJ
J

J
1
-1
UJ
^
LU
J
LU
LU
-1
J
LU
UJ
—1
j
LU

LU
-1
0) -,-
*" O
> tr
LL a.

LU
H"
i i


> CO
u yj






111
cr
D
CO
UJ
„
LU
H
Z
LLI
VIPLISHMI
O
0
o
<
CD

I















r-l O O iHOO rHOO iHrH rH



OOO OOO OOO iHrH O



OOO OOO OOO r-IO O













1
n)
H co
3 0) iH O
oo 1-1 to CD ^CN1JCM 5" W 42M C <• COCOi-l
MOUM M^4JQ i-l Z -DO -H r-l r-( 4J
w-i 0)OE W1"1 OirHE airHE EM trj«-H
>. OrHM CO OJ2M JU-i OJSM i-IO UO M
OC M4=O COG MOO 4J O MOO rH u-i -H-H O
CO OOH-i OIO O *M rH OM-i 0) EE-H
OI-H T7J'HO O-H i— liHO (TJ4JCO rHrHO MCO 0)0) M
> JJ 0) a.o).c 0,0) o-E
CM COT) 0)>0 EW EO>
OO ... -H C ... MO) ... OCO •> OJ3
CJAJ ca^ao nJ3 01,00 pM-om to^o UCB crj^j oo


* * . • •
""> vo r-. oo os
' . «J 1


















































OO
OO
«N
0
E
Q
LL
Q.
LU

-------
      LU
      o
      u
      LU

      O
      tr
      a.
      ES
      > ^
      2 W
      ua r-

        LU


        I
        CO
        O
        U
        u
Jlk-J
        o

        C/3

        U
        UJ
        Q
        'CC
        O



P U
•H -Ji

Q to
O P
O "
< C
"""" cQ
LU -U
_J ^
!"• rH
I-CU
§•§
2 «
2 >.
c/> 00
oS
UJ £
QH

<^






to
t—
Z
LU
I

_J
a.
5
O
o
o
UJ
D
5
^^
§
>
LL





O>
*~
>-
U.
00
01


^
LL.




L
C
Z
<
i

0
LI
h

t-
(•
u
«
:
c
c
V
!
c,
<

c

1
LU
UJ
1
1

LU

UJ


1
I
_i
LU
^
LU
LU
LU

j
LU

LU
-J
H
LU

LU

o
cc
a.
UJ
5

^_
c/?
LU




U
C
3
0
S
u

B
j
j




j
j
•
n
j
.
5
j
t

a


















O OO OO r-lr-IO



O OO OO iHr-IO




O OO OO t-l i-l O











1
1-1
w >,
0) 00
CO C P 41 0)
•Ci-lOO W 4JCJ CO U
aocji-iu-i b flc w ^
11 jj < P to s E
.fii-ICOCO 33 4-1 3M-ICO u-iOiT)
CONtXi Cft COCOO4J OC
PCJ-H^ U (0 3 OP
OTH-US Z XM Ur-i 4JOO
«W g i-l W P CrH dd)1!-*
0)Pfa3 IM OTJOIC 0)
OI-COZ O -u C EC-WU5ET3CO
COCJi-l iH CO Cfl D- OJCiD4C4-J
copiw E S« 1-1 O m AJ o O co tf
•& OO-O 3 Q)OE3 »5 '""t CO o ^ o)
1-1 -H 1-11-1300 0) aipr-IPOIi-lS
COC-O 3 iH>^ >S -H 0)03 T-i >O 3 rt >cOfl)
ucoc o)co i— IP 0)0) i— t po) > a)u-i o o cu AJ 4^
COOOcfl -Hr-t >^3 P.C i— t AJ 4) T3 i-t O T3Cd30)
T3P >COPU y>>'anjc2 ITIAJP OIWAJ
0) O P'H 0)0) UO) 0) 0)iH " Up COO^AJC (0
OEAJfiO) r-IO Ewe 1-IT3 rHP U 3
p3COi-j^ & O 0) CuC ^Ll-ICOr-l
O. iH O 60 O EP OPgWE* S > O. iH
EO-H 0) •• OO . 0)O CXO" OU ... OCSO
M>«-| PQ
-------
o
z
LU
O
<

z
o

p
u
LU
(-
O
c:
a.
z >
LU QC

II

= 1
LU
00
(-

Z
LU


I
CO
  O
  CJ
  o
  D

  Z
  o
  a
  LU
  Q
  tr
  O


1-1 
CJ> -,'
*" O
> K
LL. O.

LU
e» <
i i
> E
U. LU



LU
MEASURI
<£
LU
_J
^
2
LU
s
—
3
a.
O
u
o
*£
m













i-*i-HO i— i i-l O i-li-IO O O



i— 1 iH O rHi-HO i— 1 i-l O O O


i-li-IC i-ii-JO i-l iH O O O













CO ^-v
0! C«
LJ CD cr
S o c <
0 uj o, ^
•H en e P 2
eoco c O^HLJ »LJ
c. j-1 CB a. cs cc a)
•H C a) JJ u -a j;
•HAJ «iH (DSeo 4nO
W 3 60-H E n JJ ^
ij— 1 ^O Q.KJ3T3
CO CO CUi— 1 CD CO 3&.CO CO O*J 3 C
0) C B.O Q) C E D C^HCCB B.CO
4J O &• 4J O O PH J-J O CO CU
CO «O O CCj J^ M CO ri ^ g uj 0 f^
i— 1 1-1 -HIT) i-t )-i &LJ i— I W 0)30 i-IC
3tfli-l 3cfl O3COTJOCB O
U U ,C!-i O CJ T3U-I U U OJ-»C CUN
•H O SO «H O C i-l O OJ-OCO WO
u j-i a.u-1 jj jj coco 4-1 u u ai-fl cs •>— •
l-i cvro (-1 csro -3 u rvjir; CO cd g LJ o.
raOP^ -us «o>> oil- COOP-> c-1-ia.co -H g
C-.tOjC UCO Cb.CO,£ COCO fi.GOj3 •HWOCJ CJCQ
31-i OT3 -O 41 i— 1 O -H U
"O 00 Q. C l-l U CU W «J 00
CO OCO O-H>-OPQ ' 11 f •
• 4 • OLJ ... 1-I4J ... OLja)5>> COL^ w i , .,


^ * ^ * 	









































00
CO
o
(N
c
LL
a.

-------
o

LU

S
o
LU


o
CC
a.
h-

UJ  a;



I!
>  ^
2  W

   Z
   uu

   X
   c/>
  O
  U
  U
  o

  t/5

  U
  LU

  Q
  CC

  o
  LL


rJ u

a

to
01
•H
(SO
— — ^j
LU 4J
Q CO
O *-!
0 w
2 4J
< C
~ to
LU 4J
-I 3
r-rH

HA*
11
2 «
0 x
c/5 (SO
O m
UJ c
Qw

<




CO
L^
r—
LU
2
Z
C/3
I]
0.
2
O
O
u
LU
5
3
2
O
CO
0>
u^




1
LU
LU
J

LU
UJ


j.
i
.J
UJ
^
LU
4
_i
LU
^
LU
I
^1
'
LU
LU
_J
LU

LU
r»
e> -i
*" O
> CC
U- Q.

LU
^~
cn 5
h"
>~ co
U- UJ






UJ
rr
^
t/3
•^
UJ
08
LU

|—
H
t
Z
LU
5
I
vs
_J
CL
0
o
o
 E 3
figo c tn « oirH-HC
Jitusn) o cutntaai EOrH-H
to Co iJrH ^rEuu aim u -^ so
•HoOt-iij -HO) u ai -H vj a cc. ^sso
WCJJ3 >3 njrHE3 MOOOCC O-HC-
CO-HCO C^M OJS-HO o*j-Hcj4j -HE'H>
>*OOtn 01 MOi-lcn u-i to C i— >!rf4-ico
tn >-itj u o< h ctntnT3oioo-nU
01 i-ico s 130 G.Q.CS oioi-HCE a.u-itn
4-iu-iaitnc co C/I-HC OI-HOI i-i oicuSC
•HrHMC 0) 4->>CO OJrH Wi-l tOO-OI-H
> 3 O"O Xtn tntjtn-o -HOICC3 -H — 14-1
•H wtn-HC ooco a) -HC >T3-Hoa- >u>y
4J E^co Mja 4JMEto OI-H -HOI oiooitu
tj rH CUCO O CO) %43054-)V4Vl ^4-1 V4 P--
oo&c u oirH&o voi
13 OOOOC TO COr-lCC QrHrHSC OOJUS-I
D S-iOJ-H CTJ- O-H-H tTJ-QtsO-H CVJ
4J OIQ.I-I(-I. -H tn O.C04JM- cuooois-i co -H 3 tn
Cfl N OS tflrHlJ OCUOO3 ^l t-t M (-1 O MrHOC
rH >-,/-^ 034JOJ 4JIOO) rH tl CU 4J C-H-H C^C CU B.-H-H O. JS C'H O. -Q -rl
OS trjt/jcc> -HCI-I >^tnc> CDO>OC OJ-HS4J
CO-HOOI COCU3 OIOCUOO) MOltn-HO M3QJO
^S K ^i R JJ t-i C H-f1—' Kr^lOUWCQ
Ij
0)
c • •
cd i— I CM m <• ir\
























































00
eo
cs
0
"
£
5
u.
^
a.
LU

-------
o
2
UJ
z
g

o
UJ
I-
o
cc
D.
I-
il
UJ
  I
  cy:
  O
  O
  O
  Z
  D

  Z
  O
  UJ
  Q
  'CC
  O
  LL



>-i O
.. oJ
< o
o £
LU 0.
5 <




*
z
0
d
O LU
X CC








/— v
o
r" 1
CM

U
C
0)
E
Cu
o
r~H
0)
01
O
w
o>
•H
60
_ flj
LU 4-1
Q nj
O >*

c/i
o
< =

LU-U
_l 3
^_t-^{
r
D"B
7 ^
o >,
to «)
O 
LU
d
LU
LU
_J
j
LU
LU
_J
H
LU
_t
O)
o> -,•
>g
U- <^

LU
I-
s<
CT) S
'" h-
> co




UJ
cc
3
CO
^
LU
^

cS
LU
t_
M
^
^
.N31A1H
CO
_j
0.
O
O
o
ffi














0



o


o













" 1
CD CO ±4
•H O -H
co u co

J2 TJ >W
CD O
i-i B3
CQ CQ 4J
cue
O I-l d)
•HUE
oo c 2
0) -H -H
(_ CO
tj J ^J ,
CC O -u 0)
CO i-l
c en co
O 4-1 0) O
U J2 00
». a) AJ
QJ UJ X

x eu o -H
^ H
CO 0) 0) CO
C .C 03 3 >' t 4 f ••
<*-'3D< JlC'^

0



















































CO
oo
rs
*^
0
OJ
E
o
U.
a.
UJ

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO  QANR    MEDIA:Air
  State Programs  Guidelines and Regulations
  Development  (A215)	REG-        APPRO:A&c
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

      The objectives  of this decision unit are 1) development of policies and
 regulations that set forth the requirements applicable to the air pollution
 control programs carried out by the States under the Clean Air Act  (princi-
 pally the State Implementation Plans); 2) development of various technical
 guidelines including modeling guidance and emission factors to aid  the States;
 3) overviewing the implementation of the air pollution control programs at
 the State, local, and regional levels;  and 4) providing training in selected
 aspects of air pollution control.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      The FY 1978 accomplishments of this decision unit are primarily related
 to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.  Nonattainment areas were designated
 for all criteria pollutants.  Policy and program guidance was prepared con-
 cerning the content of SIP revisions for all nonattainment areas.  Technical
 guidance for these SIP revisions was also prepared, including major guidance
 on air quality modeling.  Interim procedures for modeling oxidants were
 developed and technical guidance was prepared.  Regulations setting out the
 Prevention of Significant Deterioration program were promulgated.  A program
 to help ensure national consistency in BACT/LAER determinations was initiated
 Regulations concerning lead SIP requirements were prepared.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

      The program emphasizes the resolution of technical problems of attaining
 the ozone (0,) standard and the provision of direction and national consis-
 tency to New Source Review (NSR).   The complexity of HC/NO /O  relationships
 creates major problems in designing control strategies for the attainment of
 the 0, standard and seriously impacts the States' ability to develop 0  State
 Implementation Plans (SIP's).  The NSR program»which directly affects private
 sector growth, will also be emphasized.

      Specifically the program will develop regulations to guide States on new
 or revised ambient standards for NO  short-term; 0 , and CO, develop guidance
 on technical issues related to SIP's; conduct a limited program to evaluate
 the 1979 nonattainment SIP's to help ensure national consistency of regulation;
 conduct a program of support and direct training; develop National policies
 and procedural and technical guidelines in cooperation with the Department of
 Transportation (DOT); assess regional office, State, and local activities re-
 lated to the transportation components to determine progress towards complianc
 with Clean Air Act requirements; assure that national policies and guidance
 are being applied consistently; identify the need for new or revised
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A )  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 State Programs Guidelines and  Regulations
 Development (A215) (continuation^
HQ  OANR

REG.
MEDIA:  Air

APPRO:  A&C
 national policies and guidance;  and  develop guidance which emphasizes the
 identification and analysis of alternative transportation measures and
 strategies.
                                                                  Ul
                   53
EPA Form 2410-10(8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2i DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HQ       MEDIAi  AIR
AatS  STATE  PROG  GUIDELINES  I  REGS  DEVL  (INCL EUPPRO|)A &  C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY  60  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          Q9.o          97.0          73,0         73.0
 LEVEL              OPPT           8.0          12.0          10.0         10.0
01  OF  06             FTE                       iis.i          99.3         99,3
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000,0)      5,605.0       5,411.0       «,058.3      «,058.3
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


   Description and Benefits
        This  program  is achieved through in-house  and  contracts efforts involving
   air pollution  studies aimed at identifying and  solving key technical and
   policy issues;  techniques and procedures used in  developing SIPs; establishing
   the relationship between emissions and ambient  air  quality through modeling;
   developing and  improving modeling methodologies;  developing emission factors
   for control strategy applications; providing training in air pollution sub-
   jects to air pollution control personnel;  providing guidance (through
   guidelines documents, policy statements,  appropriate literature, workshops,
   and regulations) to the State air pollution control programs; developing and
   coordinating national policy on appropriate issues  (e.g., transportation
   planning-and. visibility protection);  and preparing  analyses and documenta-
   _licm_requisite  for^nilemaking.
         This level represents a minimum program of  technical policy direction
   for national regulations and guidelines to direct States in implementing Clean
   Air Act.   The  thrust of FY 1979 and 03 control  will be continued at a much
   reduced level.  Limited studies of 03 models and  development of volitile or-
   ganic compound  emission factors (VOC) to support  the submission of revised 03
   SIP's by at least  1982 will be accomplished.  Regulations (without guidance
   on implementation) for new and revised ambient  standards for particulates, SC>2
   and CO will be  developed.   PSD regulations will be  expanded to cover CO, N02,
   0^ and Pb.   Policy guidance on selected  key issues will be developed. Minimal
   short-term air pollution training to State and  local personnel at eight
   area training  centers will be provided.  This level also provides for a
   minimum program of activities associated with the oversight and coordination
   of the transportation planning process component  of the 1982 SIP revisions.

   Impact of  Not  Funding this Level
        Not funding  at  this level will result in inconsistent  State regulations
   due to a lack of  national direction.  Inconsistent  NSR determinations would
   result in increased  litigation and delays in private  sector growth.  Technical
   barriers in the control of 0« would remain, jeopardizing  public health.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       M£DIA| AIR
A215  STATE  PROG'GUIDELINES & REGS DEVL (INCL  EIAPPRO|)A  8,  C
B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.  FY  80 INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          99,0          97.0         14,0         87.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           8.0          12,0          2.0         12.0
02 OF Ob             FTE                      115,1          9,8        109.1
   BUDGET AUTH, (000.0)     5,605.0      5,«11,0        811,6     4,869.9
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


   Description and  Benefits
       Funding at this  level would provide  an  integrated program to  ensure NSR
  national consistency  and provide headquarters support to that program.  In
  addition, the ability of the States to develop 1982 0_ SIP's would  be improved

       Major emphasis will be given to NSR  policy and guidance.  A clearinghouse
  for BACT/RACT/LAER determinations will be established to help ensure national
  consistency and a program to assist States in case-by-case determinations will
  >e managed.  Policy guidance on unresolved NSR issues will be provided as re-
  lated to both PSD and nonattainment.  Guidance on the use of models in NSR will
  be issued for State use.  Additional analysis and modeling of microscale im-
  jacts of 0, for transportation control measures (TCM's)  will be carried out.
  Regulations for visibility protection will be proposed and promulgated.  Air
  quality impact modeling will be provided  for all national regulations.  Com-
  prehensive SIP documents required under Sec. 110(h) will be published.
  Four courses will be  added  to  the base training program  in order to upgrade
  State personnel.

  Lmpact  of Not Funding this Level
       Not funding at this level would  seriously impact NSR and  result in in-
  consistent  determinations,   0, SIP's  would be developed on an  inadequate
  technical base.
                                                                    U155
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          HQ    "" MEDJ A "AT""""**"*""*"*
A215 STATE PROG  GUIDELINES & REGS DEVL CINCL EIAPPRODA & C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY        FY 78 ACT% Y^r^sT''^^'^"'^^'^
          POSITIONS  PFT          99.0          97.0          iO.O          97  0
 LEVEL              OPpT          80          12 0           JO          ll'l
03  OF  Ofe             FTE                       MS 1           6 «         1 5*5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)      5,605.0      5,«lllo        5«l.l      5,in  0
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits
        Funding at this level  will  provide a limited technical base for SIP's
   developed in   response  to  a  revised particulate matter standard.  It will al-
   so provide a national  system  for tracking regulation development schedules
   and reasonable further progress  (RFP) schedules.  These schedules are
   fundamental to decisions on the  imposition of sanctions under the Act.  It wil
   also provide for all activities  associated with oversight and coordination of
   the transportation planning process component of the 1982 revisions.

        Specifically a basic program will be initiated to provide States with
   basic technical and policy  guidance on the implementation of the revised
   particulate standard.  Studies will be conducted to assess the relative contri-
   bution-of various sources-to  small-particle particulates,-  Air quality-data-
   f rom-ORDls,,.dichotomous- sampling-aetw&rk will- be—analy-zed- to develop a
   technical base for various  control strategies.  In addition, a more sophis-
   ticated system to track  and monitor the 1979 SIP's (e.g., RFP curves) will
   be initiated.   Emphasis  will  be  given to coordinating the activities of
   Regional offices and ensuring that national policies are being implemented.
   Five training  courses  will  be added to the previous levels for upgrading
   State personnel.

        State implementation plan revision activities will be assessed to assure.
   consistent applications  of  national policy and to identify potential conflicts
   between plan revisions and  national urban policy.  Policies on Clean Air Act
   sanctions affecting Federally-sponsored activities, including those of EPA,
   will be developed, and the  application of the sanctions will be monitored
   to assure nationwide consistency.  Regional office, State, and local
   activities related to  the transportation components will be evaluated to
   determine progress towards  compliance with Clean Air Act requirements,
   to assure that national  policies and guidance are being applied consistently,
   and to identify the need for  new or revised national policies and guidance.
   The technical  guidance developed will emphasize the identification and
   analysis to alternative  transportation measures and strategies.  Policies
   and procedures for funding  the development and implementation of the
   transportation components of  revised plans will also be prepared.

   Impact of Not  Funding  this  Level
        Not funding  at  this  level would preclude the development of cost/effective
   plans to implement the  revised particulate to matter standard.  Also it would
  '. mean that minimal national  direction would be given to the implementation of
       1979 SIP's.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE          HQ      MEDJA|  AIR
A2t5  STATE PROG GUIDELINES  i REGS  DEVL  CINCL EI*PPRO|)A  & C

B, RESquRCE  SUMMARY        FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         09.0         97,0                       97,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          8.0         13.0                       13.0
04 OF  06            FTE                      115,1                      115,5
   BUDGET AUTH, (000,0)     5,605.0      5,411,0        500,0      5,911.0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits
        Funding at this  level will help  to ensure that costly  CL control programs
    are developed with  proper consideration of the effects of NO  control.  It
    will also ensure that States are given policy direction in  time to develop
    1982 0  SIP's.   It  will reduce the need for EPA promulgations of 0, strategies

        Technical  and  policy problems arising from the NO /O,  relationship will
    be addressed.  Field  study and modeling of the impact of short-range NO
    transport on downwind 0, concentrations will be initiated in order to ascer-
    tain the proper NO  control strategy  with respect to 0_. Policy and technical
    guidance and national direction to the effort to develop 1982 0_ SIP's as
    concerns NO  control will be provided.

    Impact of Nat Funding this Level
        Not funding  at this level may  result in 0, strategies based on erroneous
   assumptions concerning NO  controls,  leading to continued nonattainment
   possibly over broader areas.
                                                                    U157
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------





















2
U
<
>-
z cr
o «
<- z
t- z
u 3
UJ tO
c uj
cr u
o. or
_i 5
< CO
*- -UJ
Z £T
UJ
z t-
itW *"*
C 2
> Z
Z O
UJ i->
CO
CO M
UJ U
t- UJ **
« o o-
»— UJ
KI a.
c
UJ X CO
t- o: f.
z u.
3 _J
y
~
_J
UJ
C

CS
U.'
z
Z «e
o
•- CO
t- UJ
«t 2
« UJ
cr o
«e 3
u
UJ
CO C9
*^ o
o a
z a

» UJ
cr •-
»-» <
< *-
CO
3^
< in
«•
t- ru
ru <

=
cc
o~


cc
cr •"•
-• CO
UJ
«
••*
to
UJ

ru cs
ce z
tr ~
— 2
2
<
0-

ac
cr








UJ
_
o *-
cc •<
cr _>
— 3
z
3
U


UJ
0 Z
CC UJ
cr cr
•~ o
2



f—
CO

r*.
cr cr
i


-*
ff <
tr P
— o
























cc o
in in
o — '
9 m
HI tr
CO O
in m
o ~*
^ ^
9 ru


HI tr
• •
CC 0
in in
O —
« «
9 ru

K> cr
cc o
in in
O f»
» «
9 fU





KI e> Ki tr o o HI
CC 9 9 C KI C tr
in o in in r- -* tr
o KI r~ —
_ » ^ *- ^ -
9 ru ~- ru




KI O KI ^ O O KI
CO 9 9 O KI O CT
in o in in r- — cr
0 Kl t- —
* » « »
9 ru <-• nj




O 0 0 CD O O •<
— — o r^ r~ ru in
— — o -c o- — —
9 ru ru cc ~-
in KI rv AJ


o o o r» => e
in 9 — o cr co
o 9 ^ ^- cr
^ r*- cc cr
inru ru ru





0
c
O t—
- «
_J UJ — UJ •« >-
UJ IS —* *~ -J —>
> c. i— tc
UJ 3 3 C
_i cc o a.
tr o
o —
•C CO
cc in
9 ru
tr o
tr —
•c cc
co in
* «
9 ru


IT o
• •
tr ~
•a cc
co in
« •>
Q  O Q cr ~~ ~*
9 ruru co —
in Ktru ru


O O O t- O 0
in 9 — o cr ic
o 9 * r- tr
•c r~ co cr
in ru ru ru





o
o
o •—
« >— U, UJ
O « 0 O- O U.
• uj cr o -^ —*
u, I co 3 o
3 i— 3 z « —
r> o •< •" co
ru < i cr ::
c »- co o
1- Z X >- >-.
_) UJ "-UJ < *-
'^) o ^ *^ _> >-»
> c •- «
lu 3 3 O
_) 
•- ^T
— -c
9 tO
« ^
vi ru





o o o co o o in
— ru tr »- r» KI m
— CD ru -f> o- — —
9 O KI CO —
^ ^ « ^ - - -
in KI ru ru




-« O — CO O O 9
— KI CO * O •• «
9 ru — cc ->
in K> ru fu






c. o o «o o o —
— * — o f^ r* ru in
— — o •o tr — —
9 ru ru co —
in KI ru ru


c o o r- o o
in 9 •» e cr ec
c 9 * r- tr
•c t~~ cc. tr
in ru ru ru





o
0
0 t-
"1 t- u. UJ
o < o o. o u.
• UJ or o —• •—
U. X CO 3 C
0 — 3 Z «% ••
3 C « « to
KI «r x cr z
c f- to o
1- 2 X >- •-•
_l UJ « UJ < 1-
uj ts ^* ^^ —i *^
> c t- to
UJ 3 3 C
_l CC CD.
e» CD
— • «U
— Kl
tr — •
in KI
0 CD
fU

Cf —
« «
in KI


0 CD
• •
ru
r* KI
O- -»
« ^
Ul KI

0 CD
« ru
^* KI
O —
 —
•> *. ^ «
m KI CUKI




c o o
c oin
o c -o
in in ru






O O O CO O O —
— — or- r- ru in
»• «* o ^ tr w — •
9 ru ru cc —
in KI ru ru


o c Or- es o
in 9 -« s; cr ec
c o •« r» tr
* i- cc cr
in ru ru ru





o
o
o *-
«fi t- U. UJ
c < e rj, c u.
• UJ or o »•« «^
u. X (O 3 C
O •- 3 Z «•» —
3 O « ** O5
9 - l-t
_' UJ — UJ « •-

> c t- cr;
u> 3 3 o
—i 
-------
u

LU
a


2
O

h-
O
LU

O
tr.
a.
p
i <
o
ED
   CO
LU
   to
ACCO
DECISION U
   IT

   O
   LL


•H <^3
.. a.'
< O
Q ?
LU a.
2 <



|
O LU
I CC





/">>
• i-l
^
C
0)
E
a.
0
i-H
0)
Q

C
o
•H

3
60
0)
0£l
•o
c
UJ
Qcn
O«
Ufi
S
—•H
LU3
H0
5)-!
^00
^P-1
MO)
si
<



e/i
Z
LU
5
I

It
a.
0
O
O
LU
_J
i
o
CO
a>
T"
LL.





0)
a>
*~
^
LL


CO



^
LU




u
Q
5
<
u
•=
a
u
H
f-
£
u
^
^
a
c/
a
^
C
c.
c.
<
a

1
-i
LU
UJ
_1
LU
LU


•4
LU
^
LU
_l
_J
LU
LU
_J
J
J
«J
LU
LU
J
«J
LU

LU

->'
O
CE
a.

UJ
L_.
r"
5

t-
VJ
UJ




j
5
o
c
j
3
j
J

i
j
i
J
5
)
;
c
3









Oi—l r-H^^rHr-lr-IO tHrHrHr-l r-( r-lr-l iH





Oi-l rHlHrHr-IOOO iHlHr-liH iH OrH r-t



Oi-l i-( <-( r-l H O O O rHiHOr-l r-l OO O














^9
C
O
C C
•o o o ^-v
-1-1 W M iH C u"
M " a O-H;!^^
•HE t8<4-i 4JCB3O
II ?l 2 I^Lft.Ss^ ^ ^^
*oe c w 3 oo otnaJO1— 'ov-ij; o 100)3
oc 3-2 ^<"3 ^ oa:Bi >,
W O*J CM 03 i-IOi C M ^AJ oos <-oe e
°?P vjwwooi ocj iHtDW3(-ifia>a)
-------
       u
       z
       UJ
       a
       H
       O
       LU
       H-
       o
       £C
       a.
       O
       cc
       LU
to
CO
r-
2
LU
J16
         C/5
         -I
         a.

         O
         U
         U
         2
         g
         CO
         o
         UJ
         Q
CC
O


LJ U
•H vS

.. CL
< O
Q £
LU a.
5 <



PS
z
o

d
a LU
x cc




LT>
rH
CN
03
C
0)
s
a.
o
r-l
01
O)
Q
c
O
•^
CS
r-l
3
oo
a>
OS

T5
C
UJ
Q 03
O 0)
0 C
Z'a

LL



IT)
O
*""
^B
LL



00
(T>
^
LL.






^

C
C
<
L

a
u
h
h
(•
4
I,
<
:
0
c
«
c.
C.
<

C

J
LU
UJ
_!
J
111

LU
J

4
-j
LU
LU
4
LU
^
LU
-1
H
i
••<
LU
LU
_J
LU

LU

_j
O
cc
a.

UJ
r-

§
r-
LU






j

I
3
0
t
j

5
j
j



f
j
•
i
j
L
5
j

D











O in
r-l

iHiHrHr-lr-IOOO OO OOOOOO U1 O
o m
rH


OOO OO O OO OO OO OOO O C O
o

OOO OO OOO OO OOOOOO O O
o
I-i













U3 CO r-l
•u 3 r-l
M C O -H
03 O 0) 3 S
W u-i EC
0) Q g 3 -H 03
cJ Q) ^o rt (^ o 4,* j^
OO Pup CflOCO
M C 00 PL, 13 O -H
•O>> OM O JJC/3C PM cfl
P^ THi-l M-tp^f "H 0)ZO rH r- — ^
HC/33tfl utn-rl COCJ3
WO* OT3 t) O THCOWM-iMOO -HOC
<« CO) DC/2 CSGU-lOD 0) J34)
^•5 00 O 1) *O PJ "rt Q) O O "*•' M "O > 3M
OZ COr-l C a> ai^a-uwto-H s to woo
o) s cnw-H ga-i Qoo->o)4J o> a oc
30)0) 03 ,S gt!) WO>rH-HO)i— iH-lT-l
030)2 0) V- OJ O*-> Olpj 03-T-I3 & JZ s~, U
w i-i o>-.o> yw o EC-US QJ oi.c coo
HSU OO«J-i 0) Ui^SnJOC W U'^'OtU'O
•OO V-iC W PS"4-I 3 rJ-HOJl-i O.O 4J-HO)
PMO)4-t P-iOJU O O O0300-UUO 03 Si — 1 CCC-LJ
HJ3 JJO)034J C CO03OCOC C O iH JJOtfl
WO03 P-.03G..UO "OC •• 0) JH 73 t-l a) O U cnSOO
CO WO) M-HnJCS G-HO CUUPwO J-> -H •— i r-t
O'r-l C wosp^cd ou-rl OOOO ECJC8 03 <4-< 4-iC3
rH 0)O^30 03rHt3 Mrti-lMOEW > 0) -HO
•H • TJ X i-l i-l rH <*H VJiHrH -H OSO) M 0)tfl 0)0)O<
^u ^J 00 i~l ^D c^ ^ CO i-H O O 00 c^ T3 C3 CD p*j ^C O W p^ *rj ^ <^H
PM Oj QJ 3 ^S C^ 0) PS O P^ )S (^ i 01 ?* 3 CO CO CO ^—^ o (3 p ! 2 Cu E E 0)
HZPSU OS PM O-i 0) J W u BJ ?M 2! tJ M H 33 30) ,2
PS CO CO 23 Z




















































^_.
CO
CO

-------




















u
UJ

O
CJ
UJ
L_
r^
O
ff
Q.
_)

UJ £T
s <
2 s
o §
ED

Z C/5
UJ r—
2
UJ
5
r
CO
*••
a.
^>
O
o
u
^


1—
2
D

2
O
to
O
UJ
Q
^
5
J
^ 00
3 O

ofc
e/j 01
0 «
UJ 4J
Q w
<




M
P-
z
UJ
I
a.
g
O
CJ
CJ
UJ
J
^
2


o
CO
o>
Q^






j
UJ
UJ

1
ni

UJ
~*
-4
•j
UJ
^
LU
J
LLJ
^
LLJ
•J

J
UJ
UJ
H
-J
UJ


UJ
_J

en
Si -,•
^ O
> cc
u. a.


LLJ
r-
™ <
cn S
> w





UJ
a:
D
to
LU

o3
UJ

t
(-
I
Z
LLJ
I
CO
"j
Q.
0
CJ
CJ
m











iH CM CM O rH rH i-irHrHrHO



rH CM CM O i-H rH i-Hl-HrHrHO
CM




rH O CM O O rH rHrHrHrHO
^H


i-H OOOO i-H rHrHi-HrHO
i— 1















rJ 4-1 CJ
O -H < -O /-^
co CM «-i 3 c <
0) rH 05 M CO S
yC/3CO"O4-lT4 S U
i-i a)oieOrH 3 -HT3r^
4J TJCO OO"O4-I g-HO) rH r-|Or4
cnc cug w yocx4J-a to oigo
QJ CJ CO (fl 5 CO CJ f~"^ 2 iJ O t0 O ^ ^J ^
4Jg cOr<01 05 COT) i-iug td -HCC
CO 01 r> C^Q »r4 01^3CCgO)4-i 3O01
grH IO> !-l OO Ol> COCO rH C060-H> 05
•H CX rHVJCU 60< iH O 4JQ) C-HC 0) O.4JC 0)
J-ig OlCXrJ CPU 60 05T3 OJ3O T3 O0503-H -H
03 *H "O O &J CU W ^ g CL *H o -C 01 4-1 M
o) 05 o>sOi u^-' erfC airs cu rH 4J s cn IH M cs o
OCUgV^U O MOOltO 05 .^ U O O 4-1
C4JT4. OU O05 I+-I-H iO T3O f*1 01r4CUCXTH (3
O 60 r44J3 4-105 O4-1 054J rH tO "H O C O ft* CO C/5 0)
tjcu aitoo- 01 to -into co I-H rH -r-iscoeco >
4JCU4J >rH05x-v AJS-l P3 r-lrH TJ iH G, Q) rH 10-H C
rJ-OCfl O3 S -460 OlrH J23 OJSO. rH OJ MU (-1 g -H
O 01 r4 O- 60 3 ^^. OO -QtO C060 Sf^ttO CX ''UOIX4-101
CX(U4-iea)OlrHD.r4g>4-10l g'H S
oica) co >-i c — ' oicx 3ta O5r4 mi -H 31111 pu
CtJ S prS^WO WO I-H



























-



























00
£
CN
*^
0
CM
£
o
u.
<
Q.
u
Jit..

-------
U

LLI
O
<

z
UJ


O

Q.

_1

<

    UJ

    S
    I
    00
    O
    CJ
    •z.
    D
    Z
    O
    w
    u
    UJ
    Q


    •5f

    2
   'CC



U U
•H <^J
< <
.. 0.'
< O
O ?
LU 0.
S <



O
C3
O LU
X CC





X^i
u-i
4J
C
01
£
c-
0
r-l
CD
0)
Q
C
O
•H
CO
rH
3
oo
0)
Si

•o
c
— CO
LU
Q 03
O o>
0 fl

Z cu
^ *rj
^* -H
111 2
_JCJ
t-
r™ co
£5
H- CO
Z M
3 0
Z ^
O
co a)
o u
Q M
<





H
Z
LU
5
X
CO
li
0
U
U

2
3

§
o>
l^





J
LU
LU
|
uu

LU

•4
LU
^
LU
LU
LU
MJ

d
LU
LU
H
LU

LU
0>
0) —5
" o
> cc
U. 0.

LU
t-
s **
2 —
> , 3PUOC MQ.I OCO UHCUC
rH tHH -H4J3 -H303OT3O
Cfl rH CDrHlJ 60 4J CT flu
C O 1 01 OJ O UH G W crj M C 0) 0)
CO O. -H-OQ-O-HPu T3rJWOT3U
03 OJ-OOcfl "^^ i-l i-l i-liHC
^*t U UN 3 ECU 4J3 « rH CO U 4-1 r* CO
4JCO1I-H4J COCJ-H COOCOOTJ
•H O 4J £0) C/3 v^JU COU 03 CM >rH<4H OU-H
rH-HO4J 4-IO.C-H^- CO -HO.3
CO 4-1 CflCOOtU rH >, E-H 03 I CCtD rH OOCM
3CDCO ptiO rH cfl T3X -rl N-' >> (X OOOJ O.O O
CT rH rH *H fcfl CJ CJ 3 O rH ^ *H CO O* 4-* T3 2
0)3 CC -H -HrH4-IZ iwco CO d)4Jca CO C-~-
UTSOO OCO-O4-1 4JQ03 OO) C J2 UCXl tOCOCO
•HOC) -H60COU COU 0) U < 03 CO) T3rH O
CflEU COUOICO -H4JT300 ^U -H cfl>cO CCUC
COOrH& 4JCrHC T33 CO rH T3C-U CUT3OU
SSS i-l cOOOJefl 3O 4J ja -HOcO 4JO-rHO
CUP^rVi Elll 4JCJ-HU 4J03 CO 3 3 CJ ~) X E iJ M-4
MrHMW COCK M QCUU W






















































^_
CO
''J'
CO
CN
O
^
(w

CL
Ul

-------














u
2
LU
O

2
g
JH
o
LU
1- ..
O
Q.
i

^
h-
2 >

5 <
2 i
0 |
E D
> C/3
2 c/J
^ 2
LU
2
^-
c/2
j
Q_
S
O
u
u

*•
u.





LU
LU
1
_J
LU
^
LU
.J
4
LU
^
LU
4
LU
LU
_4

J
_J
LU
UJ
-J
-1
_l
UJ
LU


O)
p>-
05 _j
*" O
>• cc
U. Q.


LU
r-
5
2 —
> C/3
U. LU




UJ

D
LU
5
ce
LU
H
^

1-
Z
LU

XCCOMPLISf
•^^
CO








r-l iH r-l OOrHOOCM-*Ln
O VO rH r-l
r-l

rH rH O OOrHOOCN-i co
J^oitHO CUD "acncj 3C &o AJ
rHiJCOI OS -HO) -H C O
cOcaoij-iu-i cv-i 3 — < a. ij -H o)
CS-iOOcBO co-H OOcOcfl OO) C i—!
C04-IOOO tJCfl CJO) UH4J iH .O T3
codi-irH -Ha 0101-1 co co 3 oi
4J-H4JCO 3S >rH rHrH U CO (-1
CJrHOCOiH 60iH -H— ^J 0)3 iJCO CO
COdJlJOIJ-l 4JrH4-> TJO 0)01 O.
G,Ct8>C "O>s i-ICOi-l OiH >4-( CO CO CUTS
EOOCOl CJJ CC3 E*J OriU UO>
-rl-HMtJ CO-H -HO LJ-O 33 O.CO
•U»O rH U-ilHrH OICO!-l05OO TH
^nJH O. d-H 014-10 >a.co >,cj u co >
JJ d O • O43 T3n3u O"OCfl 0)0)
•H ^ /-N CO -H-H4J C4J UOJCTJUHU-l 05 CO 1-1
rHj-lp5C/5-H J-ICOCO CO C Q,CCO O O CXU
COi-i CMCO CO-TH3 CUi-iO^E'rHiJ u o D CO
3O«^^ Er-TS -OOlOO -HU-ICO C U 1-1 J3 O 0)
O"D.C/)3GrHcO l-i iH O« 2! "^- 0> 0) 01 CO O CO
V-iSCflWecj u-JOPu OWOc^ coup-i 3 E S >-i IS 3
•HCOJSZCOH CUHM s-iazo OICOM u 3 3 o oi o
< H e- H WEJZSZU
















































00
oo
CM
o
CN
o
LL
a.
It)
Jit 3

-------
     u
     Z
     LU
     U
     h-
     o
     LU
     K
     O
     .«-
     Q.
     £
     > w
     2 w
     LUH

        LU
        O
        a
        u
Ul£ •:
        o
        c/o

        U
        UJ
        Q
      •



•H ^Q
.. CL
< O
Q ?
LU o.
2 <




ta

0
O LU
x tr





^
r-i
CN
v-
4J
C
cu
e
G
o
OI
01
a
c
o
JJ
to
1— 1
3
or.
01


•a
e
— cfl
LU
Q CO
o oi
U C
i^
Q i— (
2 Oi
*""' *H
LU 3
j O
u.
Hi
t 2
2 M
D 0
1«
0 «
LU iJ
Q en

<





t-
Z
LU
I

J
a.
g
u
u
LU
P
_l
i
u
o
00
o>
5.
u.





j
LU
UJ
J
LU
UJ


1
i
LU
>
LU
_J
J
J
LU
LU
H
LU
>
LU
-J
J
LU
LU
_l
o

0) -,-
*• o
> cr
u. a.

LU
i-
« <
en 2
~ t-
U. LU






LU
cc
^5
00
^
LU


&
UJ
.
«•
^B

2
LU
S
I
C/3
COMPLI
u
^

CD
















oo in in






r^ to in















1-1 e
to o
1 O i-l 13
CO >, CO -H 4J SI
OI O C C tS cfl W
CO -H cfl J3 *J O
>s -H 1-1 u h co a.
r-( O H 01 O 01 CO
CO CL 4J Cu i-l C
C oi co co -a to
cfl«-ij3co T3 C 31-i
• O •>-> CU C to U H .
» u to h co co
CO 0) 0 O EH CU CO
Oi-l PM CUO OIUO
•H JJ ,cflc
>CO.UpL, H >-l r-i^S
C 4-1 C CO PU 01 0) Cfl
•HI-iOIC SCO >LjiH
OEO OWtsO i-l 0-
• CL, CL, -H -HCC -uco
COCUOU 4JOI-H tfl-UCl
•H CUJJ 1-I3C COOi-(
-O"O>!-i 3CJCO -HCXJ-l
3Ccuo oo o 1-1 eooica
4JCOT3CL, OIT3PJ OlMiJ
en oi i-J


























































oo
1
00

CN
o
CN
E
0
u.
^
0.
LU

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  OANR   MEDIA:  Air
 Mobile Source Standards & Guidelines (A220)
  B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

      The main objectives for this Decision Unit are the (1) setting of
 emission standards for mobile sources, and (2) the assessment of the per-
 formance of vehicles  in use in relation to those standards.  The benefits
 derived from the emission standards are a reduction in emissions of pollu-
 tants from a significant class of air pollution sources (in some cases,
 this source accounts  for the bulk of emissions of specific pollutants) and
 a  concomitant reduction in health and welfare effects associated with the
 specific pollutants.  Measurements of in-use vehicle emission provides a
 continuing assessment of the impact of the standard setting program and
 provides the basis for remedial measures, such as parameter adjustment
 regulations or other  actions, such as inspection/maintenance programs.

  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      Work was concentrated on implementing the mandates of the Clean Air Act
 Amendments of 1977, including initiating studies leading to standard setting
 for 1) heavy duty engines and light duty trucks, 2) particulate emissions,
 and 3) evaluating the relationship of electronic control systems to
 the Federal test procedure.  Attention was also given to the impact
 that evolving technologies have on the^emission-of'uncontrolled substances   "
 and the fuel economy-of-motor vehicles, including the-characterization
 of emissions from diesel engines and unregulated emissions from catalysts.
 The special effects of ambient temperatures on emissions were assessed.
 Updated emission factors for 1970 through 1977 model year light-duty
 vehicles were made available, and a program to support State/local inspection
 and maintenance programs was initiated.

  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

      The 1979 Program provides for the continuation work towards the promul-
 gation of emission standards for mobile sources as mandated by the Clean Air
 Act Amendments of 1977,  including rulemaking for carbon monoxide and hydro-
 carbon emissions from heavy-duty engines and for particulates emitted from
 light-duty engines.  Parameter adjustment regulations will be promulgated.
 Potentially harmful levels of unregulated pollutants emitted from diesel-
 powered engines and catalyst controlled vehicles will be quantified.  Assess-
 ments will be made of impacts on emissions control of special fuels and/or
 additivies and of available control technology for meeting emission
 standards.   Support will be provided to Regions and States for widespread
 national implementation of inspection and maintenance programs.   Testing
 programs for determining emissions from in-use vehicles in the field will be
 continued.
                                                                     U1G5
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2J DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND CODE         HO       MEDIA"AJR
A220  MOBILE SRCS  STDS  i GUIDELINESCINCL EIS PREAPPPOt  A & C
*^* — **** — *****"**********************l***»**l»»»«»**»»»W*»*l««»M««^i«l»««^«M ^^^
B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79 C. E.   FY BQ  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        U6.0         133.0          Q9.0          99.0
 LEVEL              OPFT         1£.0          16.0          12.0          12.0
01  OF 06             FTE                      154.8         132.6         132.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     7,50«.0     la,369.7     10,777.3     10,777.3
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits
        The  thrust of Level 1 of the Mobile Source Standards and Guidelines
   decision  unit is the studies and regulations development mandated  by  the
   Clean Air Act, the development of control measures for sources for which
   significant  emission reductions are feasible, and the implementation  of al-
   ready established stringent standards.

        At this level, activities focus  on completing promulgation of new
   vehicle mobile source emission regulations as set forth in the 1977 Clean
   Air Act Amendments; determining the emission levels of potentially harmful
   unregulated  pollutants from diesel engines and advanced catalyst control
   systems;  assessing emission levels from light-duty vehicles at non-standard
   operating conditions; providing technical support to state inspection/
   maintenance  implementation; and determining the emission levels from  in-use
   passenger cars and trucks.  Specifically; 1) Rulemaking will be completed for:

        o   Heavy-duty engines (HDE) for control of carbon monoxide  (CO) and
            hydrocarbons (HC).  This standard will be applicable to  1983 model
            year new engines and will achieve the statutory 90% reduction in
            emissions from uncontrolled levels.

        o   Heavy-duty engines for control of nitrogen oxides (NO ). This
            standard will be applicable to 1985 model year new engines  and
            will achieve the statutory 75% reduction in emissions from  un-
            controlled levels.

        o   Control of particulates emitted from light-duty vehicles (LDV)
            powered by diesel engines.

        o   Control of NO  emissions from aircraft.
                         x

        o   1981/83 high altitude emission standards.

        o   Allowable emission control  system maintenance.

   2)    Assessments and Evaluation will be made of:

        o   Levels of particulates, potentially carcinogenic organic fractions,
            and other unregulated pollutants from prototype light-duty  and
            heavy-duty diesels.
        U1GJ
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 Mobile  Source  Standards  & Guidelines  (A220)
 ( continuation')	
HQ  OANR

REG.
                               MEDIA:  Air

                               APPRO:
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
                  FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
01 06
	 OF 	

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
      o    Unregulated  pollutant  emission levels, including nitrogen compounds,
           from 3-way catalyst vehicles.

      o    The control  technology needed to  meet  a 0.4  grams per mile NO  light
           duty vehicle emission  standard.

      o    The effect of variations in ambient conditions on emissions.

 3)    Support to  State  I/M  programs will include  evaluations of I/M instrumenta-
      tion.  Mathematical modeling and analysis of I/M  benefits will be improved
      by  using data  from the Portland  project.

 4)    Testing of  in-use vehicles, initiated  in FY 1979,  will be continued.
      These test  programs will provide emissions  data for light-duty vehicles
      and light-and  heavy-duty trucks.

      Funding this level will result in  substantial reductions in gaseous
 emissions  from trucks.  Regulations to  control particulates from light and
 heavy duty diesels  will set the  framework to deal with any carcinogenic com-
 pounds found in  the exhaust.  Other regulatory and procedural changes will
 reduce the discrepancy between emission control measured by the compliance
 process  and actual  in-use  emission reductions.   Characterization of emission
 levels of  potentially  harmful, unregulated  pollutants  will be fully supported.
 Technical  support to I/M implementation will enhance air pollution control
 for  States and EPA  by  significantly reducing emissions  from vehicles.

 Impact of  Not Funding  This Level
      Not  funding  this  level would  terminate  efforts  to  further  reduce mobile
 source  emissions.   Because  the mobile  source contribution  to  total HC, CO,
 and  NO  emissions  is  large, plans  to achieve NAAS would be jeopardized.
 Regulatory  controls and  studies  required by  the Clean Air  Act would not be
 met.  Failure  to  determine  in-use  emission rates would  hamper EPA's and the
 States' ability to develop  control  strategies.  Technical  support to I/M
 implementation and determination of the benefits of  I/M would not be performed
 Harmful unregulated pollutants could not be  controlled.  The  core technology
 assessment  function, widely relied  on  by Congress in setting  mobile source
 emission  standards, would be  lost.
                                                                     U1C
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
•><••»*»»•»«»•*»••»»•••»•••»•«•«•»••••»••»»•»»••••••••»•»»•*»•»*•»»•»••••»••
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ       MEDIA:  AIR
A220  MOBILE  SRCS  STOS &  GUIDELINEStINCL EIS  PRCAPPROi  A 4  C
0 • • * • • <• Vi • • • •«• • •• W • • • • V IV 9 • •• •> • • • • ••• • • W MM • • • • M ••• • • ^ M ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ A M •! ^ ^
8, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.  E.   FY 80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        126,0        133.0          20,0        119.0
 LEVEL             OPFT          12.0         16.0           a.O         16.0
02 OF 06             FTE                      154.8          15.7        116.3
   BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)     7,504.0    14,369.7      2,155,4    12,932,7
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits

         Level 2 will provide for needed methods to assure  that in-use emissions
    do not excessively deteriorate.  A cost effective  reduction in HC emissions
    for motorcycles will be obtained by developing more  stringent emissions
    regulations.  A laboratory correlation program to  identify test procedure
    problems, and improve confidence in manufacturer-provided data will be
    initiated.  I/M program implementation will  be facilitated for some of the
    larger urban areas of the country through resolution of technical problems
    hampering implementation.

    Some  specific standards and  activities include:

      --  o    Deve-lop-attest/evaluation procedure to assure in-use durability of
      —	evaporative HG- emission control systems.

         o    Propose rulemaking for more stringent motorcycle exhaust emission
             standards, and propose standards for evaporative emissions control.
             This requires the  development of a test  procedure for evaporative
             emissions from motorcycles.

         o    Develop an improved test/evaluation system to assess the durability
             of exhaust emission control systems as part of the new vehicle
             certification process.

         o    Provide for the Clean Air Act-mandated NAS studies of technologi-
             cal feasibility of meeting emission standards and the need for
             controls.  Prototype engines and control systems will be tested.

         o    Complete evaluation of hardware-related  causes for differences
             between prototype  and production vehicle fuel economy values,  and
             complete development of procedures for assessing tire rolling
             resistance.

         o    Support I/M implementation through an active program of information
             exchange and direct technical expertise  (on a selected, limited
             basis).


             U16J
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 Mobile Source Standards  & Guidelines  (A220)
                   HO   OANR
                   REG.
MEDIA:  Air

APPRO:  A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
02 06
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Impact of Not Funding  This  Level
      Not funding  this  level will  eliminate  the Clean Air Act-required NAS
 study.   The elimination of a  laboratory  correlation program will reduce confi-
 dence in using manufacturer generated  data  for certification and standard
 setting purposes.   This is especially  significant in light of the need to
 reduce EPA confirmatory testing.   Potentially large emission reductions will
 be foregone with  the elimination  of work on improving durability assessment
 tools.
                                                                   ulCJ
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM 21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE   "**"*HQ""""""MEDIA |*Il!T"""*"'"""""""
A220 MOBILE SRCS STDS  &  GUIDELINES*INCL EIS  PREAPPROi  A  & C
            ^   "  "" " ^" ^ ^^ " <• & 9 <• • *• • • • • V0 • •• • •• • • M M • • • Ml • • • • M M W • • M ^ M ^ • ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^^
B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT  FY 79  C.  E.  FY 80  INCR   FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        126.0         152.0          13.0        132.0
 LEVEL              oppT          12.0         ib.o          2.0          ie!o
03  OF  06             FTE                       154.8          9.^        157.7
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     7,50U.O     14,369.7      1,437.0     14,369.7
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits
         Level 3 provides for  work aimed at assuring emissions reductions through
     support to in-use vehicle  control, continued support  to established standards
     through procedures refinement, and assessment of hazardous pollutant emissions
     Activities include:

         o    Developing and assessing an improved dynamometer which will
              be able to correctly simulate road loads  for light duty vehicles,
              thereby improving  the accuracy of emissions determinations.

         o    Quantifying exhaust emission levels of nitrosamines for both diesel
              and gasoline-fueled vehicles.  This work  will involve the develop-
              ment of the test methodology.

         o    Preparing  a technology status report on the development of heavy-
              duty vehicle emissions controls to support  the promulgation of the
              statutory  NO and  particulate standards in  1981.
                          x
                                                               i
         o    Continuing the Portland I/M evaluation for  an additional year.  The
              effects on emission reductions of additional cycles of inspection
              and maintenance will be documents.

         o    Assessing  ways of  implementing I/M for heavy-duty vehicles.

         o    Providing  support  to Regions and States involved in developing
              and implementing I/M programs.  Technical issues will be analyzed
              and guidance materials will be developed.  Technical expertise will
              be made available  through appropriate arrangements among EPA,  States
              and localities implementing I/M.


     Impact of Not Funding This  Level

          Not funding this level will jeopardize EPA's  ability to objectively
     assess industry requests for delays in heavy-duty  gaseous and particulate
     regulations.  Further field work on the Portland I/M project will be
     cancelled, precluding an assessment of I/M benefits for a vehicle popula-
     tion that has been  subjected to repeated testing cycles.  Active, direct
     support to Regions  and States for I/M implementation will not be provided.


           017J
    EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
Z tt
O «
— r
>- i

u> (o
>—
o uj
31 U
CL a:

_J O
<: (0
t- uj
Z or

z >-
2 •-•
O Z
or 3

> z
2 O
(O >-»
UJ <->
t- U.'
< C
»—
cn —
       2 C
       O •-
       O
       « tn
       a: o
          *—
       ot (O

       LJ (ft
       IO U
       •-i a
       C en


          UJ

       or "i
       —i I
       < O
          X
          r\,
      r~ ra
      rv ^
                 
                                                                                                           m
                                                                                                           c
                                                                                                                                                                                       o  -^ ir>

                              OO05TOO
                              o ^- « Aj r\i —•
                              J/^ ec >G •£ »*
                                                               OOO^OO
                                                               in  
-------
o
2L
LU
O
<

Z
O

H
U
LU

o
CC-
o.
i
il
  CO
UJ
  01
  2
  I
  CO
  O
  O
  U
  2
  O
  u
  LU
  Q
  O
  LL.


CJ
W *•£)
•H <
.. CL
< O
O Q_
LU Q.
s <





1
o
o
O LU
x cc










o
ts
CM
5
tn
a)
c
1-1
HI
13
•r-1
3
U
— "0
^J rj
Q to
Sec
*O
1-3
~ c
LU tO
—1 JJ
h-Crt
P 0)
t °
O O
71 ^
O a)
(%<-{
p
QS
<




CA
H
LU
I

~
O.
5
0
U
u
H
J
5


0
00
LU


r-
o>
*~
^
LL.

CO
en
>
LL





U
Q
0
<
U
^
01
u
h
h
h
L
^
:
(/

c
«
t,
<
Q
LU
LU
_J



LU
LU


1
1
_ J
LU
^>
LU
J
LU
UJ
.J

I
J
UJ
UJ
-1
-(j
LU
LU
-J

-i
0
cr
Q.
LU
H-

s
H
V)
LU





J
5
">
t
j
5
j
j


•
j

i
j

»
5
I
2
















iH r-t r-l i-4 rH i-l -H rH





(
iH r-l !— t rH 1— 1 i— 1 i— 1 O












CQ
13 0)
U > M C 0
S Q to O C
"O X VM CMC
C C O to CO tfl 0)
X U 60 tn E C (U
COZOWO-HJSC njo-o
gWUl-tl-ir-l C<1 -H i-l OtS
O >w «-i i-i O K O ' — tOBJCUO C

£>QQOMO tJsOrH^gcO
a &. c -
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 Mobile Source Pre-Production Compliance
 Verification (A225)
HO.   OANR   MEDIA:  Air

REG.        APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
      The major objectives for this Decision Unit are to assure that new
 motor vehicles and engines covered by emission standards are capable of
 meeting emissions standards for their useful life, and assuring the quality
 of  the data used for determining compliance with fuel economy standards.
  Ci  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      The pre-production compliance verification process, mandated by Section
 206 of the Clean Air Act, involves the submission to EPA of applications for
 certification by the manufacturers, the development of emissions performance
 information by manufacturers and EPA on the basis of prototype testing,  and
 the review of these data by EPA for the purpose of determining compliance
 with standards and approval/disapproval of certificates of conformity.

      Compliance of the 1978 model year with the applicable fuel economy
 standards was calculated.  In addition, fuel economy labeling information was
 generated for trucks up to 8500 pounds.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
      The thrust of the 1979 Program is to continue to carry out the prepro-
 duction verification process.  A new emphasis is the implementation of the
 Act's requirement that emission control systems or devices do not result in
 an unacceptable risk to the public health and welfare, i.e., hazardous
 emissions control.  The pre-production review of vehicles is also carried
 out to provide information on their compliance with fuel economy standards.
                                                                     U17-3
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM 2l DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          HQ       *EDIA|  AIR
A225 MOBILE SRCE PREPRODUCTION COMPLIANCE VERIFAPPROi  A &  C
• • 4p " • • • *• V *• • • • •§ M • • • • • V • 4W • •> • • 9W • •• MMW M Wtt MM • • • • • fll •• M M Ml M M ^ M MM ^M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^
8,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY 8Q  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        126,0         109.0          sa.o         82.o
 LEVEL              OPFT         12.0          H.O           8,0          8.0
01  OF 07             FTE                      133.2         106.9        106.9
    BUDGET AUTH.  (000,0)     5,«00.0       a,765.0      3,573,8     3,573.8
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   Description and Benefits

        In meeting the  objectives for this Decision Unit priority  is given to
   developing greater efficiency, extensive use of ADP  and statistical techni-
   ques, implementation of hazardous pollutants control requirements, and
   compliance assurance for more stringent standards.   In the long term, it is
   expected that changes in procedures will result in improved operations.

        Certification provides EPA with the option of precluding the introduc-
   tion into the market of high-polluting vehicles and  engines prior to
   production and  prior to the time that manufacturers  make irrevocable
   commitments to  specific engine configurations.

        The process of  engineering review and verification of compliance will
   specifically address:

   Light-Duty Vehicles  and Trucks

        In FY 80 the new standards for carbon monoxide  of 3.4 g/mile, for
   nitrogen oxides of 1.0 g/mile and for evaporative hydrocarbon emissions of
   2 g/test will be implemented.  The compliance with the existing 0.41 g/mile
   hydrocarbon standard will be determined for light duty vehicles.  For light-
   duty trucks the program will implement the 1.7  g/mile hydrocarbon, 18 g/mile
   carbon monoxide, 2.3 g/mile nitrogen oxides exhaust  standards and 2g/test
   hydrocarbon evaporative emissions standards.  In addition, particulate matter
   standards, which become effective during the 1981 model year, or FY 1980, will
   be implemented.   The requirements of section 202(a)(4) of the Clean Air Act
   (regarding hazardous emissions control) will be integrated into the engineer-
   ing review and  testing program.  Parameter adjustment regulations will be
   implemented.

        Technological changes in the auto industry will be addressed through the
   implementation  of engineering review of vehicles using electronic control
   systems.   These systems have the potential for  being defeat devices that
   cannot be readily identified through the current review procedures, which
   focus on the functions of mechanical or electrical systems of limited capa-
   bility.

        Parameter  adjustment regulations for idle  mixture and initial choke
   setting will be implemented for selected engine classes among those under-
   going full engineering review and confirmatory  testing.
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
   Mobile Source Pre-Production Compliance
   Verification (A225)   continued
                    HQ   OANR

                    REG.
MEDIA:

APPRO:
Air

A&C
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
-2LOF-2Z-
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT-
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


        Control of hazardous emissions by  manufacturers  will  be  encouraged
   through a program of engineering review and  testing for selected  engine
   classes of vehicle classes  undergoing the full process of  review  and
   confirmatory testing.

   Heavy-Duty Engines and Motorcycles

        For the heavy-duty engines and motorcycles,  the  program  will be  self-
   certification by the manufacturers  that emissions standards are met.   All
   certificates of conformity  with standards will be issued stating  that
   manufacturers of new engines are meeting emission standards based on  the
   manufacturer's claim that he is in  compliance.  EPA will not  review informa-
  tion .or data .-or.,conduct .confirmatory tests of  suspect results at  contractors'
   sites.

   IMPACT  OF NOT FUNDING THIS  LEVEL

        Not funding this  level will result in elimination of  all EPA activities
   aimed at assuring new vehicles' compliance with emission standards prior  to
   manufacture.  Certificates  of conformity with  standards would be  issued
   solely  on the basis of manufacturers' statements  of compliance.  Not  funding
   this level will allow the use of inappropriate or ineffective control systems
   by manufacturers (i.e., control systems that will not do the  job  will not be
   identified prior to manufacture).  This will become a major issue affecting
   in-use  vehicle emissions with more  strigent  emission  standards.  Inadequate
   control systems will not be kept out of the  in-use vehicle population at  a
   low cost.  The only review  system effective  for the new control systems
   that will increasingly rely on electronic controls will be eliminated.  Only
   a pre-production type review can verify whether or not electronic controls
   are not de facto defeat devices that will result  in increased emissions from
   in-use  cars.  No FTP or short-test-based program, such as  inspection  and
   maintenance, can provide assurance  of compliance in this area.  There would
   be no assurance that control systems do not  emit hazardous pollutants or
   that in-use vehicles are manufactured with components that would  make it
   more difficult to maladjust them.
                                                                       J17
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       M£DIA|  AIR
A225  MOBILE SRCE PREPRODUCTION COMPLIANCE  VERIFAPPROf  A  4 C

8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT  FY 79  C.  g.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         126.0         109,0          16,0          98,0
 LEVEL              OPFT      .    12.0          11.0           3.0          11.0
02  OF 07             FTE                       133.2          12.3         119.2
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000,0)     5,400,0      a,765.0        71^,7      a,288.5
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS

        This  level provides for an increased  level of efficiency in the verifi-
   cation program, full implementation  of  the review and evaluation of hazardous
   emissions  for controlled vehicles, and  full review of all electronic control
   systems.   This  is expected to result in a high degree of assurance that
   control systems do not lead to in-use problems due to emissions  of hazardous
   pollutants and  that in-use vehicles  will not emit regulated pollutants,  i.e.,
   HC,  CO, and NOx, in excess of the levels assumed to be allowable by the"
   Federal Test Procedure under conditions  other than those accounted for by  the
   FTP.   Preproduction review of heavy-duty engine and motorcycles  and imple-
   mentation  of high-altitude emission  standards are also provided  for.

   Light-Duty Vehicles and Trucks

        o    A computer-assisted engineering  and emissions data review program
             will be implemented, with  the major manufacturers submitting infor-
             mation in computer-compatible media.

        o    Additional engine classes  will be subjected to detailed evaluations
             related to hazardous emissions and electronic control  systems  (as
             described in Level 1).

        o    Pre-production review and  certification of vehicles to which high
             altitude standards apply will be implemented.

   Heavy-Duty Engines and Motorcycles

        o    The program will consist of selected engineering review of design
             information from the manufacturers on  the new engines  to identify
             engine configurations for  durability testing and potentially high-
             polluting engine configurations  for emission data testing.

        o    Procedures will be developed  to  implement evaporative  emissions
             standards for heavy-duty trucks.

        o    The motorcycle certification  program will consist of engineering
             review of design information,  selection of vehicles for durability
             and emissions testing, review of test  results and examination  of
             the testing facilities in  the U.S.


           U17J
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 Mobile Source Pre-Production Compliance
 Verification (A225)	
                   HO  OANR   MEDIA:  Air
                   REG.        APPRO:  A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY80CUM.
LEVEL
02 07
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)










-





  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Impact  of Not Funding This Level

       Not funding this level will result in a lower level of review and test-
  ing of  electronic control systems and a lower level of activity  in assuring
  that vehicles do not emit hazardous substances.  The implementation of ADP-
  based review  systems would be delayed.  No review and testing would be carried
  out for heavy-duty engines, motorcycles and cars having to meet  high-altitude
  emission standards.
                                                                     U17
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM 2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE    """*"HO""""*"MEDIM"AIR""
A225 MOBILE SRCE PREPRODUCTION COMPLIANCE  V£«IFAPPROi  A I  C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       F^TB'^^"^^'^'^'^'^^'
         POSITIONS  PFT         ,?J.O         109,0          {,%

       07            TTE      •    12'°         &1            -
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (QQO.Q)     5>OQO.Q      «,765'.0
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Description and Benefits
       Funding this level will provide for better control of in-use vehicle
  emissions through improved pre-production assessments  of  control system
  durability and improved control of engine parameter adjustability.   This
  level will also provide for greater assurance of compliance with high altitude
  emission standards and with evaporative emission standards.  The main
  activities at this level provide for:

  Light-l^uty Vehicles and Trucks

       o    An improved method for determining deterioration of emission control
            systems over the useful life of a vehicle will  be implemented on a
            pilot basis for subsequent full implementation  in model year 1982.

       o "   A formal -mechanism^will ~be" established ami-a—program implemented to
            incorporate Selective Enforcement Audit and  other production and in-
            use vehicle program data into pre-production review and compliance
            verification activities.

       o    The high-altitude program with EPA review of designs and test
            fleet identification will be expanded.

       o    Confirmatory tests on light-duty trucks suspected of high evapora-
            tive emissions levels will be conducted.  A  parameter adjustment
            program for parameters other than idle mixture  and initial choke
            settings will be implemented.

  IMPACT OF NOT FUNDING THIS LEVEL
       Not funding  this level will preclude the implementation of improvements
  in pre-production assessment aimed at making in-use vehicles' emissions
  controls more durable and less tamperable.   Additional pre-production assess-
  ments aimed at reducing tampering in-use with engine paramenters other than
  idle mixture and  initial choke setting will be eliminated.  Pre-production
  compliance testing of evaporative emissions from  light duty trucks and pre-
  production testing of cars that have to meet high altitude emission standards
  will be eliminated.
          U1T3
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------




















u

UJ
(3
^
V
z a.
o <
•-• r
»- r
u 3
uj to
*-
O UJ
IT U
IL CC
_1 0
« CO
f- UJ
Z or
Uj
r »-
z ^*
0 Z
CE 3
> Z
? C
UJ •"
cc
CO —
UJ (j
>- UJ
« o
en —
Q
UJ I
•- c u.
••* o **
z u. 

U.'
u
«
•M
_)
Q.
r
u

^*
O
z —
o •-
*•» ^j
*" X
< a
"" O
e i
< 0.
IT UJ
IT
«« a.

UJ UJ
CO kj
*^ ^y
O CO
z
UJ
* J
or —
M 3
< e
c
<
< tr
rvj
r- ru
ru <

a
cc
 ru



B in
?o •-
r- in
in ru
« «
m ru




B B o in o e c>
p^ »^ O — • C\l B «
f*. ST Kt in B O
in in c ru —
^ ^ ^ ^
ft ru *• rv
%



B B o in e o o-
w K» o — ruB <
r* ar *\ in B o
m in o ru —
« « « «
m ru — ru




o o o o o c ru
in in o ru t> — •«
« cc cc o e — «•»
f^ P*1 »^ O «• w"
* * » ^
a K\ »• f>


o o e e o e
o o o ru -e ru
o ^» it o ru •»
9 C ^ 9 ^
» » * *
in - => r •• ~
= o < »- »
^ * X "" Z
0 •- CO 0
•- Z X >- —
_j UJ — UJ -r •-
jj tS *^ >^ «l •••
> C. •- en
IAJ 3 3 O
-J tH CO.
in B
c —
B 0
ru *•
a ru
in B
B x
B O
ru »»
9 ru

m B
V •
B —
B O
ru »•
^ ^
a ru



in co
B —
B 0
ru ^-
% ^
7 ru




in in OB o o ru
o eo c — co — o
co ru * o c» — —
ru o ru r- —
% * * %
JT K* — ru




^- *• o »^ o o »•»
3 =r o o -o .»i ru
*• B ««\ m ^ *•
r> 9 ru 9






o o o o o o ru
tn m o ru o »KI
•a eo CD e o — KI
r^ fo ft o ^ —
* ^ » »
JI Kl — Kl


o e o c o o
o c o ru •£ ru
o r- r»i o ru —
9 ^ ^^ 9 ^
« » » »
m ST «.KV






^^
0
0
o ^
•» •- U. UJ
f^- — _j — u. a. >-
e < o a. o u.
• uj ar o *•* ^*
U, I CC Z 0
n — s s •» -
= o •* *~v:
ru « r tr z
o •- en c
>— z x >• ••
_J UJ •• UJ < •-
yj (J «^ «i^ J *•
> O t" CO
uj *"" — c
-J = CO.
o e>
in ru
•o o
r- o
9 fO
o o
tn ru
« o
f~ O
9 1*1

e o
• •
•n ru
^ o
r- o
« »
9 tt



e o
tn ru
•« e
f»- O
« «
a fi




e e e o o e —
in tn o ru tr ru -o
^> ft KI o o — ru
»>- m 9 o •• •-
» M « «
a Kt — m




mm o ru o o o-
« « 0 M
»- •*! Kl O — —
» ^ « ^
9 ft — • ft


e o o o o o
o o o ru « ru
o ^ ft oru —
9 O ft 9 —

in 9 —tt






0*
o
o
e ^
•ft •- U- UJ
t^ ^^ ^ ^^ t* ^ ^B
e < e a. otk
• UJ (t O ^^ *^
u. X « 3 e
o «- 3 r •» «•
» o < *^ v>
it < I JE Z
e »- en e
i- Z x >. —
_) UJ — UJ < »-
uj (S *•• ^* «J "•
> o •- co
UJ 3 => C
_1 tt CO.
       B
       ^
       I
c:

-------
u

UJ
a
0
LU
I-
o
cc
a.

LU
    UJ
    S
    X
    to

    3
    Q.


    O
    o
    o
    g

    cyj

    U
    UJ
    O
    u.


M U
< <
^
< o
O n
LU a.
S <




ei
1

O LU
I OC







/_v
CM
CM
^
C
o
•H
JJ
CO
U
•H
M-l
•H
CU
^
cu
a
c
re
T-H
c.
E
0
u
c
— o

O AJ
O CJ
O 3
0*0
^— Lj
^ CU
— 1
LU CU
-J S-l
h-a.

'-cu
H CJ
II
DECISION
Mobile S
^




V)
H
Z
LU
Z
00

Q.
O
u
u
LATIVE
=>
S

o
00
0)
>
LL,





O)
LU
UJ

_,
LU
LU




LU
^
UJ
j
UJ
>
LU
_J




LU
LU
_J
1
^
LU
UJ



Ci —•{
*" 0
> tr
U. 0.

LU
H-
fV S
en S
*~ )_
^* w
LU LU




LU
CC
D
00
^
LU
5
cS
LU

^
H
L.
^
LU
I
C/5
ACCOMPLI
CD














0 0
^O CM





O u">



O lA
LO rH
,















•H CO
A 0) I
0) -U T3 CO fH
> CO CU O >*-<
o co a -H
H T) <-> 3 t- H 13
Q Q) 3 O O
i-3 4-> C t8 Cu i-J E
CO O JJ •
t3 CU •*-( CO t-H *O C ^
c*-i4J"ao c o Oj
CO U t-i CO -H [d
CO 3 U-l 4J U
^> C ^3 O C ^* Cd ^J
O O O O O \-> cfl
J -H Lj >, U J 3
u a. 4J OD-O
U-l (fl -H CO  CO CO
4J C — 1 -H U CU CO
COMCUS C<-IC
CUUO.V-ICU (DUO
O 3 CJ -H -H
ai -^ p* cn c cucuco
iH CM

(
























^
1
\




























.^
CO
CO
rsi
cs
a.


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO          MEDIA:   Air
  AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT (A230)                                         Air
                                                    REG. X       APPRO:   A&C
  B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       This decision unit consists of the regional offices'  policy direction
  and program management of the process for developing SIP control strategies
  and regulations.  It also includes the development of control strategies
  and regulations by the regional offices themselves where the States do not
  act.   Finally,  it covers general management evaluation and consultation with
  State and local governments on air pollution programs.
  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Work during FY 1978 concentrated on data collection,  studies,  and
  initial development of State Implementation Plans (SIP)  revisions for the
  areas so required;  the assessment of the plans for other areas where the
  attainment of the standards was in doubt or the adequacy of the SIP was
  questionable; and continued work related to the delegation of responsibili-
  ties to States and  new source reviews where this responsibility resides
  with EPA.

       The Classification of areas—Air Quality Regions  or portions thereof—
  of the country as to their attainment status of their  status  for implementing
  prevention of significant deterioration requirements,  was  completed.   In
  addition, implementation actions and defense of EPA's  requirements  continued
  for those controls  that require implementation.
  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       The FY 1979 program will be oriented  around the SIP revision for non-
  attainment areas.   The regional offices will guide the development  of,
  review and approve/disapprove some 460 State VOC regulations.   They will
  likewise promote and direct,  review and approve/disapprove approximately 81
  I/M programs and 176 TCM planning efforts.   These three  activities  will
  lead  to approvable  0  SIPs.   In addition,  the regions  will guide the States
  in the devleopment  o? TSP SIPs in some 397  non-attainment  areas.  A major
  activity will be the engineering and air quality review  of approximately
  1500  sources under  the PSD regulations.   The regions will  actively  seek State
  adoption of the PSD program to reduce the  regional NSR workload by  FY 1980.
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FO»M  2J DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          RG       M£DIA| AIR
A230  AIR  QUALITY MANAGEMENT                        APPRO| A  &  C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY  79 C. E.   FY  80 INCR""""™™!!
         POSITIONS  PFT         299.0         331.0         272,0        272.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          20.0          27.0          19.0          19.0
01  OF 06             FTE                       364,1         328,6        328.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000,0)     5,600.0       8,601,4       7,272.6      7,272.8
   Description and Benefits
        At this reduced  level of funding, the regions will  operate in a reactive
   mode and will be unable  to actively pursue new programs  or  stimulate the
   States to correct past deficiencies.  The principal task of the Regions in
   FY 1980 will be to track the States in their follow up and  implementation of
   the SIP schedules submitted in 1979.  At this.level,  the regions will review
   and approve/disapprove State developed RACT regulations  for 16 new VOC source
   categories.^  In addition, the I/M schedules, required in 1979 for 8| major
   urban areas, will be  tracked and SIPs disapproved where  they are not followed.
   Likewise.*, .the activities and analyses of the 102_MPOs_funded under Section 175
   will_ be tracked to ensure^_that the approved schedules are observed.. .. Finally,
   fugitive dust control schedules will be monitored, and control measures for
   these sources will be reviewed and approved/disapproved  as  submitted.  All
   other State-developed SIP revisions will be reviewed and approved/Sdisapproved
   as submitted. This will  include any State developed PSD  and lead plans.  In
   general, the Regional role in the SIP program will be confined to review and
   approval/disapproval; resources will not be available to give policy and
   programmatic guidance to the States while SIP revisions  are being drafted.
   The regions will not  undertake promulgations or other actions in areas with
   disapproved SIPs and  sanctions.

        The cegions will be able to perform minimum engineering and air quality
   reviews in those States  not assuming PSD responsibility. The_ regions will
   also act on the some  120 fuel conversion orders and Section 125  actions.

        The Section"105  air pollution  control  agency grants and the  Section 175
   planning grants will  be  negotiated by the regions.

   Impact of Not Funding This Levej.
        Not funding at this level would eliminate EPA's direct contacts  with  the
   States.  SIP revisions would  not be reviewed nor approved,  and major  incon-
   sistencies and inequities among States would result.  Resources would not  be
   available to act on_new source jpermits, resulting delays in private sector __
   growth decisions.  The Section  105 and Section 175 grants ($100 million)
   would be given without negotiated  conditions.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2| DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 ,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          RG       MEDIA!  AIR   '
A230  AIR  QUALITY  MANAGEMENT                        APPRO!  A i  C

8,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY  80  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         299.0         331.0          36.0         306.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          20.0          27.0           8.0          27.0
02  OF  06             FTE                       364.1          29.4         358.0
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)      5/600.0       8,601.4         999.6      8,272.4
     Description and Benefits

        •  In  addition to the activities  described at Level 1, the regions  will be
     able  to  provide active policy and program direction to the States for SIP
     development in high priority nonattainment areas.  Regional offices will give
     States direction and support in developing RACT regulations for 16 VOC source
     categories.  They will also actively  guide and manage the implementation of
     I/M in the 50 areas having approved schedules in 1979.  Coordination  and pro-
     gram  support will be given to States  on  the continued development or
     implementation of fugitive dust controls in 68 urban areas.  The Regions will
     actively work with the J3tates and MPOs in half of_ the 102 metropolitan areas
     receiving Section 175 funds to ensure that national policies and require-
     ments are met.                         _

          A major initiative will be undertaken at this level to complete  SIPs in
     the some 157 nonattainment areas not  completed in FY 1979.  This will involve
     guidance to the States and/or use of  contracts.

          State NSR programs will be reviewed and evaluated to ensure both techni-
     cal and  policy adequacy.  In addition, the regions will actively work to
     delegate the PSD program to all remaining States.

          In  summary, resources at this  level will be utilized to ensure that
     program  called for in the 1979 SIPs are  implemented in accordance with
     national guidance.

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

          Not funding at this level would  mean that approximately 157 non-attain-
     ment  areas would continue to have disapproved SIPs and sanctions.  EPA regions
     would be unable to take an active role in ensuring that national policies are
     implemented_by the States in_VOC, RACT_,  I/M, fugitive dus^^and TCM.	SIPs	
     and""SIP  scTiecTules would" them be approved/disapproved as submitted and
     sanctions would likely increase.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2t DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
                                              4
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         R5       MEDIA»  AIR
A230  AIR QUALITY  MANAGEMENT                       APPRO|  A  I C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C.  E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CU«
         POSITIONS  PFT         399.0         331.0          39.0        3«7.o
 LEVEL              OPFT          20.0          27,0                        27.0
03  OF 06             FTE                       36«.l          24.8        382.8
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     5,600.0      8,601.«        962.7      9,235.1
    Description and Benefits

         The incremental activities  of  this level will be oriented ro providing
    the  States with active policy and program direction in all nonattainment
    areas.  Direction and coordination  will be given to the remaining 51 MPOs
    receiving Section 175 funds and  also to additional MPOs with  responsibilities
    in SIP development.  Fugitive dust  control activities called  for in the
    1979 SIPs will be directed and managed by the regions in 151  smaller urban
    areas.  These activities will ensure that EPA takes an active role in SIP
    development and implementation in all of the currently designated non-
    attainment areas.

         In addition, the regional offices will be able to give limited policy
    and  program guidance to the States  in the development of lead and s^hort-term
    N02  SIPs.  Also, resources will  be  available to give program  guidance and
    planning to regional ozone studies, ensuring that they will meet the require-
    ments of 1982 SIPs.  Limited guidance will be given on the development of
    visibility protection plans.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level
        Not funding at this  level would result in no SIP  guidance being given to
    125 MPOs preparing TCM elements.  Guidance jwould not be^ava.i-lable for 151
    fugitive dust areas.   In  all  of these nonattainment areas  SIPs being
    submitted on schedules would  be approved/disapproved as  submitted; with a
    likely increase in sanctions.  Work on the 1982 0^ SIPs  would begin without
    EPA direction.  SIPs  for  Pb and short-term N0£ would be  approved/disapproved
    as submitted.  No guidance would be provided for programs  of visibility
    protection.
             U1C
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------




















>-
r
e:
<
>-
Ic tt
o «
•-• X
•- z
*-
O UJ
rr u
—
_1 O
•a 10
>- UJ
z a
UJ
r i-
z >-«
c r
er z;
> z
z o
UJ I—
to
CO — •
UJ U
M- UJ
« c
CO —
Kl
o
UJ 1
*- 1C
z u.
~









z
htU
X
UJ
z
z

>•
*•
J
<
^
CO C?
•z
o or
w M
0 •<
U.'
C£ C
Kl
•- ru
a «

3
cc
0


Kl
ec
o- ~
-•to
£

— z
z
•<
a.
^^

cc
D-
—




UJ
_
0 *-
cc •<
O- _J
— 3
x
3
o



UJ
C X.
CO UJ
a or
" U
z




*•
O UJ
r*
o a.
— a
x
LJ

r- 3
p* ^
»• u




















CC CD
ru rx«
p"- P"
ru a
r> -c
cc cc
ru ru
f^ f^
ru a
r^ «


CD CC
m m
ru ru
r*- ^.
ru a
«. »
r~ *

cc cc
ru ru
r- r-
ru a
t^ «



cc ru •& co o o *c
ru — — ru ru o- co
r»> KI a i*- f^ •• ru
ru — ** a ru KI
* A »
r^ F*» ^





cc ru -o co o o .c
ru — -• ru ru e- s.
r* KI a >»• r- — ru
ru — — a ru KI
^ * *
t^ r^ *





a a ru o o —
_ _ ir> — r^ a
co in KI ru ji
.£> -O « Kl Kl
^ *• ^
CC CC f-

c o coo
o o a o c
o o cc o ru
•c. •£ o- ru
in in a


.*^
c
o
o »-
f> t- U. UJ
C «f C B. C U.
• UJ CC O ^ *-•
U. X CO ^i O
3 >- 3 r •» —
3> O •< ^ CO
— « Z It Z
O H- CO O
*- Z X >- »-t
.J UJ ** UJ < »-
III (^ ^^ ^v^ i ^4
> o •- co
UJ 3 DO
_i ec o a
a a
rw ru
r** ^
ru KV
ec >-
a a
ru ru
^** ^
ru KI
ec »^


a a
• •
ru ru
r- *
ru KI
* «
co »-

a a
ru ru
P»- ^
ru KI
eo r-



a v^ KI a o o c
ru o ru ru co f~ cc
r» •• -c -c e ru in
ru — — -KI KI KI
» » »
co cc r~





•o o- »^ •c o o a
O CD C (^ iJD CC O
o- r- ru cc KI ru
0-0- CO







a a ru o o —
— ~ in •- r- a
oo in KI ru -c
•C -C « Kl Kl
^ » ^
CC CC t-

o o o e o
o o a c- o
o c cc tr ru
o -c o- ru
in tn a


o
c
o *—
« *- U- UJ
0 « O O- O U.
• UJ CC 9 >~ +*
u. x to r> o
o — n z •» —
r> o « >- co
ru < i tt z
o »- to o
*— 2 x >- »-*
_l UJ « UJ < »•*
UJ t» ^ ** _J — •
> d *- to
uj z> no
— > cc o a
— ru
in o-
Kl ~«
ru ru
o cc
— ru
in e-
Kl — *
ru ru
O CO


— ru
• •
m c-
Kt —
ru ru
* ^
O CO

— ru
m o-
Kl — •
ru ru
O CO



*- O- ru ru o o cc
in KI •* o- r-* t^ ru
KI in cc » a ru CD
ru o — ru KI KI
* « ^
C- o- co





f- CD r^ CD O CD
ru KI oo <«3 o- a
,0 a — in KI ru
er o- CD







a a ru o o «••
— — in •< r~ a
o o in KI ru *
•C -G •f Kl Kt
^ ^ «
CD CC >-

O O O O C
o o a o o
o o co o ru
* « o ru
in in a


o
o
o ^
M >— U. UJ
o « o n. o u.
• uj a o v«^
u. x to n o
O *~ D X w ••
Z? O < ^ CO-
Kl < X CC Z
o *- eoo
^Z X >- l-t
_IUJ *" UK »-
UJ 17 ^'^ ^^ •J ^^
> O »- CO
uj ~ so
_i ec co.
          cc
          r-
           I
01  5

-------
o
z
UJ
O
O
UJ
h-
O
CC
a.
h-
LU c

I-
ii
  LU

  2
  X
  O
  o
  o
  Z
  O

  C/5

  U
  cc
  O
  LL


1-1 C_
*^4 fci
.. CL
< O
U ft
UJ Q.
5 <





X

d
O UJ
x cc









yMy
O
CO
CM
C$

W
z
*^
^H
H
I— I
a
cr

as
h-4


^
n i
o
o
u
Q
Z
s
LU

H
H*
H-
z


z
o
**
o
UJ
Q

<



h-
z
UJ
5
X
CO

Q.
O
u
U

<
— ^
s

o
§
CT)
r-
^
U.








O)
O)
U.
00
O)
*~
>
"•





U
a

0
<
u
«

u

h
h
H
2
u

c

c
^
C
<-
t
<

a
LU
UJ

UJ
tu




UJ
^
UJ
_J
H
UJ

LU
-1


^
LU
>
UJ
-J
A
«J
HI
^
UJ
•^



*T»
O
cc
LLJ
2
*
t/5
LU





J
C
5
1
C
J
5
j
j




]

i

J
5
;
;
t

3












C O i— 1 xC C\
O CM OO l~» i-(
1^ rH ^- i-H CM
C5 O1 00 ^C 0^
O CM r» iH
r^ r-i T-I CM

O O rH r- M
O CM 00 i-l CM
t^- rH **^ ^^- *^»
~-. ^» O iH 00
O O tf"l m vO
O CM
^
O O vd CTs
O CM fH r«- i-l
r~ T-i 00 iH CM
O O O O O
O CM
r>- iH


O vO O*>
O r-t r- rH
U-l 00 rH CM
r-l "^. "^ «^.
O 00 r- I-H
O i-l CM
iH

•5. -5 ^ ^ ^
Z Z Z Z Z



•O 1113
0) U 0)
^ 4J 00 C T3
w o) to e co 1-1
*H rH 1- 1H g I "0 3
iHO.0) > O 0)i-l 00
t-i^OE'O -HLj )43 AJ
•H pO 70 O L^ 0) ^M 00 CO 0)
T>< 0)0) SE 0)T!
(0 0) ^-^ 03 C /— v V-O UR3 i-i
3 E oiocn C Ht-i cgoi
i-^ Lj pi CO "H CM 2£ Cfl 00 ^
CXOCO >, ffl iH ~~-O OOO JJ-H
OJLJ toaicn 3 -HO, O)-H
30>t-iC!>cM oooo u Eoo
0)O.Oni-ii-i oi woo
BS-HOH-lOCM 300 ^H>, 4-IC
ooaiu-iu oi)-i E -H i 4-1
C-OU-I OICC l-lO. 1-lrH CC
•HOOB.OO T31 O OOI
V-lS C/5-Hl-l CDC SOD, CE
Oil— 1 *-l4JCQCO Cfl, 03 OlCdU 0) V OS)Cu p- r-H ^
cue UrHoi )-!>, 1-1 c u co a. o
i-l -H O WOICO CSO cfli-l HSLj
OOrHl-l30£ T-l >E -H 4-1
crooo c TD y-ii-(<; M-I-HO «-i c
W34I WCC OOP-i OOlLj OCO
^ 
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (A235)
HQ
REG. X
MEDIA:
APPRO:
Air
A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
      This unit includes:  (1) the management and overview of State ambient
  air quality monitoring networks and associated laboratory and field quality
  assurance support activities;  (2) field investigations for collecting
  ambient air quality samples; (3) determination of source emissions; and
  (4) the processing and analysis of data obtained from (1), (2), and (3).
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
      Technical guidance and direction were provided to State and local
  agencies to ensure that State and local monitoring sites operated properly
  and _generated valid data_^  Data generated by States and localities was
  edited and verified.  Activities concentrated on auditing all State labora-
  tories and evaluating ^monitoring sites,.. ISA. continued- to_fincaurage_State	
  and local agencies and regional councils to use the standardized air quality
  index developed in JT_197_6_._ A.JFederal/Sta££_.prQgram._f.or ranid collection jand
  analyses of ambient data for nonregulated pollutants was continued in order
  to ensure their availability for national assessments of the need for control
  or for determining trends for these pollutants.  Computer software providing
  expanded retrieval and analysis capabilities was developed and distributed to
  all State and local users of the Comprehensive Data Handling System (CDHS).

  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
      The major thrust of the FY 79 program is to evaluate monitoring networks
  and individual stations for purposes of designating a national network (NAMS)
  and State network  (SLAMS) and to negotiate schedules for completion of these
  networks.  The submission and validation of data from the States will con-
  tinue.   The minimum required quality assurance program including auditing
  of individual sites and State laboratories will receive increased attention
  in order to determine the quality of data used for SIP revisions and
  regulatory decisions.  The Regions will begin the coordination necessary to
  have daily reporting of air quality in all major urban areas greater than
  500,000 by the end of 1980.   The Regions will continue their involvement in
  special monitoring studies for noncriteria pollutants both in quality
  assurance and sample collection.
                                                                  JILT
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
FO*M  2: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. OECISI
A235 AMBI
ON
ENT
UNIT
AIR
TITLE
QUAL
AND CODE
MONTRNG
RG
MEPIA
APPRO
I
I
AI
A
R
I
c
8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FV 79  C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          80.0          89,0          72.0          72.0
 LEVEL              OPFT      "     6.0           7.0           7.0           7,0
01  OF 08             FTE                        99.0          90.5          90.5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     1,200.0      2,222.5   ,   1,663,9       1,863.9
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and  Benefits
        At this level,  coordination for special regional ambient monitoring
   studies for ozone in the  Northeast and Great Lakes area can be done.  This
   activity involves design  of  the study and placement of instrument monitors,
   and ensuring consistency  of  data bases collected (ambient  air quality,
   meteorological and emissions).  An additional 500 site evaluations of SLAMS
   can be performed focusing on sites needed to support new SIP's for lead and
   N02.

        Limited coordination with ORD and State agencies in establishing special
   particulate sites capable of particle size discrimination  in major urban
   areas, test newly developed  Q.A. procedures and work with  the States in the
   operation of the sites and forwarding of air samples for analysis .*  In the
   Western states, the monitoring study coordination will focus on visibility
   protection areas and involve the Department of Interior.   Regions will be
   able to coordinate Quality Assurance for special studies of noncriteria
   pollutants such as toxic  organic compounds and to a limited extent undertake
   collection of ambient samples of noncriteria pollutants such as vinylcholoride
   and nitrosamines.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Inadequate development  of air quality data required for 1982 SIPs and
   of a data base for new TSP SIP development will result from not funding
   this level.
               UlC'J
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
FORM  2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION  UNIT
A235  AMBIENT AIR
TITLE  AND CODE
QUAL  MONTRNG
RG
M£DIA|  AIR
APPRO!  A &
B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PF7
 LEVEL              QPFT
02 OF  06            FTE
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)
         FY  78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.
               80.0          89.0
                6,0           7.0
                             99.0
            1,200.0      2,222.5
          FY  80 INCR
                 13.0
                   1.0
                   7.9
                344.5
                FY 80  CUM
                      85.0
                       8.0
                      98.4
                  2*208.4
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits
        The Regions will be  limited to routine processing and validation of air
    quality and emission data to support SIP revisions, attainment/non-attainment
    decisions and source litigation.  The air quality data from 50  percent of the
    critical NAMS sites will  be screnned for data  anomalies and validated.  The
    Regions will perform on-site quality assurance audits of 75 percent of the
    State laboratories and all Regional laboratories will participate  in ORD's
    national performance surveys.  A limited number of on-site audits  (primarily
    a calibration check) will be done.  All State  networks will be  reviewed for
    adequacy in terms of number of sites and their geographical distribution.  No
    additional site evaluations of SLAMS or NAMS will be done at this  level of
    funding.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level                                .
        Neither processing or validation of air  quality data nor review of
    State/local monitoring networks can occur,  if this level is not  funded.
                                                                 J1L-J
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2\ DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE
A235  AMBIENT AIR  QUAL MONTRNG
R6
MEDIA|  AIR
APPROi  A &  C
B, KESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY
80.0
6.0

1,200.0
79 C. E.
89.0
, 7.0
99.0
2,222.5
FY BO INCR
4,0

2.0
136.4
FY BO CUM
89.0
8.0
loo. a
2,344.8
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits
       At  this level, 1000 additional  site evaluations of NAMS and SLAMS  can be
   performed with emphasis on sites  not attaining standards in major urban areas.
   This involves an on-site evaluation  and detailed documentation of the con-
   ditions  existing at the monitoring station.  Site evaluations also include
   collection of ancillary data on traffic flow and sourde emission rates  near
   the station.  The remainder of State laboratory audits (25%) can be completed.
   The Regions will coordinate daily reporting of air quality as required  by
   Section  319 of the Act in urbanized  areas greater than 500,000 population.  A
   limited  number of PSD ambient network reviews will be done at this level.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level
        Inadequate data evaluation of  monitoring stations and limited daily
   reporting as required of the CAA will  result from not funding this level.
             UlSJ
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------

9
cc
cr


CO
o- •-*
— CO
UJ
r;
UJ

ru ts
CC 2
e- ->
••" 2
2
•<
0.
2
IS CC
< er
V •—
2 C
C 1
*• r
i- I
bj co
0 UJ
CC u n .
Q. CC ^

-tO 0 —
•« CO CC <
>- uj o _»
2 or — n
uj r
r •- s
0 2
CC =>
> 2 *-
2 O 2
UJ *- UJ
co or
CO ••• CO UJ
Uj u O CC
*— UJ *" U
« e 2
CO ~
o
uj r
•- CC H-
2 u. O UJ
r> r-
o or
— cr
3
U

f- 3
o- *-
•— u
ts «r
2
C
Z
o
r
i

tr
»•*
«E

*-
z
to uJ
2 i-«
o cc
•• s
u «:
UJ
a: in
K>
•- ru
or <
0- f-
KI in
•0 «
cc in
»* V*
0- ^
K? tp"
-0 «
cc in
— —


e- r^
• o
KI in
^ ^
ec in
^ ^
— ^

t> r^
K! in
^ ^
co in
* %
•w w>




o* ru *- r- e> o in
KI f~ * in ryj f>- o
*O 5J ••• ^ *^ O
co cc in

•- •— WH




o ru »- r^ o o tn
•* r~ & IP tv r~ o
•c 9 — •£> r- o-
ec co in
^ ^ «
»• •* «•




in in o o o o
ru ru •« o r- tr
ru ru -o co o*
ru ru cc
^ *i ^
ru ru *•

o o o o o o
o ru co cc o 
•e •- u. uj
CO *•* _> ^» u, £L *-
O < O CL O U.
•Ill Ct O ^^^.
u- x v> ^ o
o *- z> r «^ ••
r> e < •- co
— c >- i—
_* UJ — UJ < »^
--J 1 f •» ^^ ^^ 1 «^
> c t- tn
UJ — DO
_1 CC OB.
sr —
CC IT
o m
ru cc
ru -
51 —
co in
o tn
ru cc
ru —


s» —
v •
cc in
o in
ru cc
^ »
m "

a ~
cc in
o in
ru co
« ^
ru — •
.



a a o — o o a
cc r- — in in cc cc
o co ru in co o>
ru — cc
• • •
r« ru —




in ru KI 9 o o o-
sr c- 9 o- Ki — • t«-
99 CO —
Kt Kl fU






in in o o o o
ru ru * O» r-O
ru ru * co c-
ru ru cc
^ » ^
ru ru —

c o o o e o
o ru co cc o -c
o in 9 o co
ru •> o
» *i «
*^ ** «-«




e
o
o t-
*» t- U. UJ
cc ^ _» *»u. a. »-
O •< 0 O- O U.
• UJ CC 0 «- ^^
U, X CO — O
o ^- ^> x ** ••
3 C < «-< CO
ru < x or 2
c »- co o
>- 2 X >• <-<
_J UJ — UJ •< >-
UJ CS ^* *-^ «J •"*
>• c »- cc
uj r> z> o
_j cc o a
CC f-
9 O-
9 -O
KI cr
ru •-
cc f
9 0-
9 -C,
KI cr
ru -»


co r-
•> 0
9 cr
9 -O
Kl O-
^ ^
ru —

CD r*
9 O-
9 ^
KI cr
« «
ru —




CO CO O r~ 0 O 9
9 Kt •- cr tr cc c
9 ru ru ^ co o
Kirn cr —

ru «\j —




90 •<> o o
*i «D 99 ru
Kl Kl —
** «• v«






in in er o o c
ru ru *«r r» er
rw ru « oc cr
ruru co
« » •
ru ru —

o c> o o o e
o ru co co o -c
o tn 9 o cc
ru — o
^ • •
v» •* «•




-
o
0 t-
•» »- U, UJ
CO — _»--»U. O. •-
0 < OQ. O U.
• UJ CC O w >-
U. X CO S O
O — 3 I •» —
=1 o «e "CO
KI < x or z
o »- coo
— 2 x: :>- >—
_) UJ — UJ •« •-

> c >- to
u. => =0
_> cc oa
           CC
           r*
           I
           I
           o-
01-1

-------
o
Z
LU
O
<

z
o


o
01
H
o
cc
D.
li
  LU

  2

  I
  CO
  O
  O
  0
  Z
  D

  Z
  u
  LU
  Q
  5
  'CC
  o


w u
•H ia
< <
.. a.'
< O
5 £
LU t£
2 <






X
d
O u
I CC



y— N
in
m
CN
<
•«*•

O
z
OS
o
H
HH
Z
o
s

f«
EH
M
,-J
<
o-
OS
M

H
Z
H
H- 1
«
y
^
UJ
O
O
(J
Q
Z
<

LU
^
H
P

H
Z
D
Z
O
53
5
LU
Q
<


M
K
z
LU
&
M
J
a.

Q
O
u
<
>
ULATI
2

O
o
00
o>
T"
>
LU







1
_j
LU
LU
-1
m j
LU
>
UJ
•J
1
1
_l
UJ
>
UJ
J
H
_l
UJ
>
UJ
-J
J
~J
UJ
UJ
— 1
H
1
_1
LU
>
LU
«J


en
r»
? 3
^ O
> CC
LL Q.
Ill
~ h
00 if
£ 1
O) ^
^^ L^
> &
U. LU




LU
MEASURI
cB
LU
_l
H
^H
I""
h-
Z
LU
5
I
CO
—1
0.
Q
U
o
<
CD




O
in
m
ro


O
-3"
o
m


o
•a-
O
cs





O
~3"
O
CM


<
•^^^
Z




CO
01
•o
s
iH
O
•H
N.^
tn
u
•H
"O

<

6
HI
4J
CO
>.
w
14-1
0
V4
01
!
z

1 a
m


o
.3-
\D O
m


o
-a- o
vO
m





o
-3- O
>o
in


<
Z



CO
3
rH 03
CO 01
> -H
OJ -o
01 4-1
•U CO
•H
co  U
cfl i-H W
c o
•H > <*J
•a eo
W -H
O C •
o co o co
CJ 4J iH M
M 4-1 O
- O CO U
c «-( c u
00 VM -H a)
CD Ol -rt CU -O U
we xi co ^ u
20 E 0) O O C
< -H D T3 OS O O
Z 4J Z •
-^ * o o

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  TRENDS MONITORING AND PROGRESS ASSESSMENT
HQ    OANR  MEDIA:   Air

REG.         APPRO:   A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The objectives for this Decision Unit are to assess the status of
  attainment of ambient air quality standards, to provide national management
  of the National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS), to ensure that the ambient
  and emission data collected pursuant to the State Implementation Plans is
  valid, to operate and maintain systems for data processing which store air
  quality and emission data and make it available to both Federal and non-
  Federal users,and to strengthen the data processing and analysis capabilities
  of State and local control agencies.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       The National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report,  1976  was published
  During  FY 1978,  EPA continued to encourage State and local  agencies and
  regional councils to use the standardized air quality index developed in
  FY  1976.  To implement Section 319 of the Act,  regulations  were  proposed
  in  1978 that require the index to be used in State monitoring programs.   A
  Federal-State program for collection and analyses of ambient data for
  nonregulated pollutants was continued.   The development  of  a rapid capability
  for obtaining air quality information for special studies was planned.   Com-
  puter software providing expanded retrieval and analysis capabilities was
  developed and distributed to all State  and local users of the Comprehensive
  Data Handling System  (CDHS).  Guidelines for the siting  of  ambient air
  quality monitors were proposed.  In addition, a power plant modeling
  system was developed and made available to support energy related analyses;
  analytical techniques for estimating particulate concentrations  caused
  by  fugitive emissions were improved; advanced computerized  techniques
  for graphical analysis and display of county/State/national air  quality were
  developed; guidance on development of quality control checks for screening
  air quality data, on developing ambient concentration isopleths, and on the
  use of  meteorological data in air analyses were published;  air quality
  isopleths and population exposure assessments were prepared for  eight
  cities; revisions to 40 CFR Section 51.7, reporting of data to EPA,
  and Section 51.17, air quality surveillance regulations, were proposed
  and guidance documents on ambient monitoring needed to support revisions
  to  40 CFR 51.17, were issued.
                                                                 DIE 3
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78) .

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  OANR    MEDIA:Air
 Trends Monitoring and Progress Assessment (A223)   REG         APPRD-A&C
   continued                                       "cu-	Mrr""'
  D .17 _1979_ PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       Major emphasis  will be given to  national  management  of  the  5-year  plan
  for implementing the recommendations  of  SAMWG  and  carrying out section  319
  of the CAA.   These requirements  will  be  reflected  in  new  regulations  for
  monitoring and reporting to be promulgated in  FY 1979.  A major  goal  of these
  regulations  is to establish a national air monitoring network which will
  generate high quality data and be operated by  State and local agencies
  using nationally uniform methods.   Effective implementation  will involve
  substantial  national oversight,  the provision  of technical guidance to  the
  regional offices and the development  of  new software  to facilitate  reduced
  State reporting.   Key activities will include  assuring the NAMS  are being
  established  in a nationally uniform manner, and preparing periodic  assess-
  ments of the plans and first year progress of  the  regions arid States  in
  implementing SAMWG's recommendation and  the regulations.'

       Current programs to assess  and report the Nation's progress in achieving
  National Ambient Air Quality Standards,  (NAAQS) and to operate EPA's  national
  air data systems will be continued.   Efforts will  be  initiated to make  the
  States more  self-sufficient in data handling and analysis by increasing the
  capabilities of the  EPA-developed systems  used in  28  States  and  providing
  use of these systems to additional agencies via an EPA computer.
 EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          HQ       MEDIA| AIR
A233  TRENDS MNTRNG & PROGRESS ASSESS-AIR        APPROI A  t c

B"  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C.  E.  FY  80 INC*    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         43.0         «3.0         32.0         32.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          5.0           7.0          5.0           5.0
01  OF 05             FTE                       53.0         44,6         44.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000,0)     3*500.0      2,020,9      1,515.7      1,515.7
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and  Benefits

        The activities  conducted are achieved through in-house contract  efforts
    involving data storage, processing  and retrieval; development and maintenance
    of systems for data processing  (including systems used by State/local  air
    pollution control agencies); analysis of data on emissions and ambient air
    quality, determination of trends in air quality and emissions; development
    of standard operating  procedures and regulations for the ambient monitoring
    stations operated by State  and  local agencies; development of policy and
    guidelines on air quality data  analysis; and management of the National Air
    Monitoring Stations (NAMS).

        At this level through technical guidance, and visits to the regions and
    selected NAMS, perform national management of the Regional/State efforts
    designation of all  stations to  be in the NAMS network.  (On or before
    Jan. 1, 1980,  each  State must submit to EPA a detailed description to  be
    included in their NAMS network.  This must include schedules for: re-siting
    any stations not meeting NAMS criteria, establishing any new NAMS required
    and implementing quality assurance). Perform overview of all required
    Regional/State monitoring programs  and prepare assessments of the progress
    being made in designating the NAMS  and in implementing EPA's monitoring
    regulations and  the recommendations of SAMWG.  Review plans for upgrading all
    monitoring stations to comply with  EPA criteria.   Develop information  base
    on 200 NAM stations.   Develop regulations and related technical guidance for
    the revised particulate standard.   Continue program to evaluate national
    progress in improving  air quality to achieve and maintain NAAQS.  Publish
    national air quality and emissions  trends report.  Operate EPA's national
    air quality and  emission data systems without any modifications other  than
    remaining compatible with changes made by the computer center. Data sub-
    mitted pursuant  to  SIP regulations  would be updated periodically and
    files and software  would permit the retrieval of data by regions and head-
    quarters.  Provide  basic systems, include "enhancements" support, trouble-
    shooting and 3 minor systems to an  estimated 28 agencies using the EPA-
    developed (State operated data  system).  Develop statistical methods and
    supporting guidance to define NAAQS for SO^, S02> and particulates in  terms
    of exceedances relative to  a computer concentration limit.  Provide
    guidance to regions/States  in computing the specific air quality values for
    63, N02» CO and  S02 upon which  the  specific control plans for these  pollu-
    tants will be  based.

                                                                       JU5
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  TRENDS  MONITORING AND PROGRESS  ASSESSMENT (A233)
  CONTINUED	
                        HQ OANR

                        REG.
MEDIA:Air

APPRO :A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
     FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.  FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL
   01    05
  	OF	
               POSITIONS
 PFT
OPFT
 FTE
              BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


Impact of Not Funding This  Level
    . Withdrawal of  funding  for  this  level would  eliminate:   a program to
ensure national uniformity  and  overall management  of  the  regional/State
efforts  to select and  establish a  central core of  high  quality air monitoring
stations  (the NAMS  network) vital  to the Agency  in making national assessment
of  air quality; a continued overview of State/local ambient  monitoring and
progress  towards implementing the  recommendations  of  the  Standing  Air
Monitoring Work Group; development of the regulations and technical guidance
needed to support ambient monitoring of small particle  particulate matter by
States;  definitive  evaluations  of  national  progress in  achieving  the NAAQS
(as required by Congress,'CEQ,  environmental groups and the  public);  National
air data  systems which provide  a storage location  for data reported,in accor-
dance with SIP regulations  and  a means of retrieving such data by  regions and
headquarters; limited but critical support  to the  State/local users of EPA-
developed data systems; and development of  the statistical bases  for new
NAAQS for particulates and  SO   and revisions to  the NAAQS for SO  .
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2! DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
4t M ^ WM4p (•• iV M4V • • IV •• • * * • Ml ••••• • •• • • • • • • M MM • MM • MMMM • ••• M • MM.^^M 0 M^ M M^^^ • MMMM
At DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ       MEDJAi AIR
A233  TRENDS MNTRNG & PROGRESS ASSESS-AIR        APPROi A  4  C

8. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79 C. E.  FY 8Q INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         «3.o         «j.o          7.0         39.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          5.0          7.0          2,0          7.0
02 OF 05             FTE                       53.0          6.4         51.0
   BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     3,500.0     2,020.9        303.1      1,818.8
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


    Description and Benefits

         At this level joint regional/headquarter visits of NAMS will be initi-
    ated to determine, first-hand,  actual  degree of compliance to EPA ambient
    monitoring siting criteria,  equipment  specifications, and data validation
    procedures.  Visits would be limited to a  sample of 25 NAMS per year.   Data
    from this sample would be used  to  make rough national estimates of NAMS
    compliance with EPA siting criteria and the overall effectiveness of State/
    regional/headquarters data validation  efforts.  Develop information base
    on  the final 175 NAMS stations  (completing an effort begun in FY 79).   New
    software which would allow EPA's national  data systems to receive air
    quality and emissions summary statistics would be developed.  All arrange-
    ments will be accomplished so that 6 States not having access to State
    computer support could share in using  the  EPA-developed ambient and emission
    data systems on an EPA computer.   In addition, training for all users  of
    these systems would be provided.   Trends and spatial/temporal analyses for
    nickel, berrylium, benzo-a-pyrene  and  polynuclear organic materials as
    support to regulatory decisions would  be performed.  National air quality
    baseline statistics needed to project  air  quality impacts of alternative
    national energy strategies,  revised national ambient standards, revised
    federal automative emission standards, and new source performance standards,
    etc. will be computed.  Software which allows regions and states to compute
    area and pollutant-specific concentration  limits not to be exceeded more
    than once per year will be developed.


    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         On-site visits to even a small sample (25) of the entire NAMS network
    ('v/  750) are vital since without such actions, EPA would have no firsthand
    knowledge of the many factors bearing  on NAMS data quality.  Without
    national involvement, there would  be no assurance that NAMS are meeting
    minimum criteria.  EPA's efforts  to base future national trends upon a small
    but high quality data base would be less effective.  If EPA does not develop
    the software to allow its national data systems to process summary statistics
    there will be no workable means for allowing the States to submit summary
    statistics rather than individual  readings.  The sharp reporting reduction
    recommended by SAMWG will have  to  be deferred by at least one year.  If the

                                                                       J1S7
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                   HQ OANR
  Trends Monitoring And Progress Assessment (A233)
     continued                                     REG.
                               MEDIA: Air

                               APPRO: A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY80CUM.
LEVEL
02 05
	 OF 	
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 "shared" system"is not Implemented,   6  States  will, have  to continue  to pro-
 cess data manually and depend upon EPA  for any reports of their own  data.
 The reporting of required data by these agencies  will continue to be slower
 and reflect their continued inability to edit  the data before submission.
 Ambient analyses of un-regulated pollutants are needed to determine  spatial/
 temporal variability, a key component to decisions on how and whether to
 regulate such pollutants.  Air quality  and baseline data for the criteria
 (regulated) pollutants are needed in forecasting  and evaluating air  quality
 impacts of national energy and environmental strategies. Under the  revised
 NAAQS for Ozone and NO , air quality managers  must develop concentration
 limits for each area of concern as a precondition to developing strategies.
           uu;
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. AGENCY

    M  2» DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          HQ       HEDIA| AIR
A233  TRENDS MNTRNG &  PROGRESS ASSESS-AIR        APPRO| A  & C

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C.  E.  FY  80 INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         43.0         13.0           4.0         43.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          5.0          7.0           1.0           8.0
03  OF 05             FTE                       53.0           3.«         54.4
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     3,500,0      8,030.9        202.1      2,020.9
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits

         At this level,  surveillance  of the National Air Monitoring Stations
    (NAMS) will be shifted from the very  limited program of visiting 25 NAMS per
    year to a more comprehensive audit of 150 NAMS per year.  This level of
    auditing is the minimum necessary to  establish a reasonable level of national
    consistency among  NAMS and allows each station to be visited an average of
    once every 5 years.  Findings from these audits will be a primary source of
    data for assessment  of NAMS  and provide clear documentation for the correc-
    tive actions needed  to comply with EPA criteria.  All historical data for
    NAMS sites would undergo quality  assurance screening and validation.  Re-
    quired retrieval and comparison programs will be activated and data inspec-
    tion and record-keeping operated  until final anomaly resolution is  completed.
    Trend data from NAMS will be coded to indicate reliability of trends based
    on available precision and accuracy data (collected as part of the  EPA/State
    quality assurance  program).   New  software and related procedures will be
    developed and made available to the regions and States which can be used to
    display data graphically and allow a  variety of advanced statistical analy-
    ses.  Six modifications to the EPA-developed air quality and emission data
    systems installed  in 28 States would  be.developed and furnished to  users.
    Such modifications are developed  in response to a consensus of user requests
    and increase the ability to  State and local agencies to edit, analyze and
    retrieve their data.  The installation of one or both subsystems could also
    be accomplished in 2 additional States if requested by the regions.

    Impacts of Not Funding This  Level

         On-site audits  of 150 NAMS per year are needed to establish a  minimum
    level of national  air  quality baseline levels and analyze pollutant trends.
    The screening of all historical NAMS  data and resolution of all anomalies
    identified is required to ensure  the  integrity of data which should form the
    core of the national analyses of  ambient trends developed by EPA.   formal
    incorporation of the data quality indicators into the air quality data bank
    would allow an effective link among ORD and OANR quality assurance  programs
    to improve data quality and  monitoring methodology.  Knowledge gained from
    NAMS audits and ORD  laboratory audits will be used to code air quality data
    for more meaningful  analyses.  Not implementing the tie between quality
    indicators and data  would be contrary to recommendations of numerous study
    groups to upgrade  national data quality, analysis and reporting. Only a few
    regions and States have any  current capabilities for performing advanced
    analyses of  ambient  data.  Future air quality management efforts will be
    hindered without more  widespread  use  of such analytical tools.  If EPA does
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
U-UJ

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
                   HQ
  A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 Trends Monitoring and Progress Assessment (A233)
    continued                                      REG.
MEDIA: Air
APPRO: A&C
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
03 05
	 OF 	

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 not develop and furnish modified software to the State and local users of
 EPA-developed data systems, these users can-be expected to either find
 manual solutions to their new needs or attempt to develop their own software.
 Since these agencies already have some automated capabilities, it is generally
 far less expensive to add new software than it is to add new manual opera-
 tions.  Independent modification by each agency is not cost-effective and
 would destroy EPA's program to keep all these systems standard.
          U2U
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------




















>-
z
UJ
IS
^
>-
Z ff
O •<
•-t I
«- r
0 =>
bj co
C UJ
tt u
CL Or
_J 0
•K CO
t- UJ
z a
U
r »-
Z *•*
c z
e s
> r
z c
l» t »>*4
CO
CO 1—
b.1 u
•< O
CO ~
o
uj s
•~ tr
i*^ £3
Z b.




tr
I
CO
CO
UJ
CO
iO
^

CO
Z CO
c uj
•-• tt
t- a>
« o
•-> o:
c a.
or *e
•e a
z
UJ tt
CO »-
"-> Z
O I
z
CO
•• o
c z
>-t UJ
< a:
fc-
<
< KI
Kl
r- ru
ru -e


cc
O-


Kl
CC
o- ^,
— CO
bJ

r
*—
CO
ifcj
fU C3
0 Z
cr w
— 2
5
CL


cc
CT








UJ
K-4
o *—
cc <
O1 _J
V ^
X
^



UJ
c z
cc uj
cr a:
z



•-
9- UJ

cr ct
— tr
2
u



_j
** O
p' ^
*-• u
^


























r- ^
tr o-
— 0
m e*
• *
^ «
• *
If! O"
— O
IT 0*
«
•••


f~- a
• to
in c-
••• o
in t>
-

r- a
<* *
in cr
— o
in er
*
4-M





^- O f- ST G> O <£
irv if\ o O1 rxj ir< 9
— — C= O Kl 9
tn o u*v ff~
«, ^
VH OT




f^ 0 *- 3- O O -*
in m o cr AJ in ^
*• VN o O Kl <7
in o in o-
* *




cr to w »n o o o
o in in *\i K> r- KI
fv o- AJ «-• a- in
O Kl ^ Aj
* fc «k
M — *-




o e o o o o
o o o o KI m
o KI r* o sj
in =r o —
* 0 •> *
Kl AJ -• f\J







O
C
o *—
*! >- b. UJ
in w «i ^* u. a. >-
O «e C a. c U.
* UJ 2 O ^^ •«— '
u. T CO 3 0
O <- ^ I •» —
3 O < «-• CO
•• « I cr 2
c H- eo c
•- z x >- >-
_ 1 UJ •— UJ < **
.iJ CJ w. »^ _J — 1
> o •- co
uj r> =c
_J 
c a in co
Kiru ~





o in a in o o o
o in in ru KI r» KI
ru c- ru ** a in
O Kl i£ ru
* ^ «
ru -> —




o e o o o c
e o o o KI in
o KI •- o a
in a o —
• » A »J
Kiru — ru







c
o
o »-
CO t- U. UJ
in •- _t — u. o. t-
o < o a. o b.
• UJ QT O ^* ^^
U. T CO 3 C
c »- 3 r w —
S O < ^ CO
ru < x tt z
o t- co c
•- Z X >- «-
_l UJ — UJ « •-
uj o ^ ^* _j **
> C H- CO
UJ — ^ O
_) (E CO.
0 «
o ru
ru —
c ru
ru —
o- -c
e ru
ru —
o ru
^ ^
ru —


o- •*
• •
o ru
ru — •
o ru
ru —

0- -0
tr •
o ru
ru —
o ru
« «
ru "





o o a * o o a
o in in ru KI cc a
ru o — — 3 en
o a ^ ru
* » »
ru -• —




-> e — KI o o a
ru m r- «- a -• KI
o a in ru
ru — • ••





o in a in o o o
o in in ru K> r> KI
ru o- ru — a m
OKI -c ru
• « ^
ru — ••




o o e o o o
o o e e KI OT
o Kir- e a
in a o -*
«•.•*«
KI ru -« ru







o
o
0 t-
K •— U. UJ
in «- _i ~ u. o. t-
C « O Q. O U.
• UJ ar o ^ %^
u. I co — e
O •— 3 Z «• ••
3 C < *» CO
KI <. x ar z
c «- co o
•- z x >- i-t
_1 UJ •• UJ «« *-
ll t r*) ^* ^^ _1 f^
> C t- CO
UJ S 3 C
_i tr oo.
         I
         0
         o
OC-1

-------
U
z
UJ
o
Ul
I-
O
CC
Q.
2 >
Ul rr
>  w
2  W
U.H

    01
    2

    CO
    O
    O
    o
    D

    Z
    O

    CO

    O
    ui
    Q
   'CC
   o
   U.


)-> U
iH Lt

.. CL
< 0
Q £
5 <




as
O


d
O uj
x cc











/—s
CM

'*-'
JJ
C
0)
CO
to
CD
CQ
CO
<
CO
CODE)
rogres
Q O,
1?
LU ^
±g?
HiH
tS
DECISION UN
rends Monit

UJ
o
e> _,•
*~ o
> ir
U, Q.
UJ
H-
03 5
2 i
> C/>
U. UJ




UJ
cc
MEASU
e3
MENT TITLE
ACCOMPLISH
CO
















rH rH fO  U 4J QJ O CQ-H U COM CO
>> P~-HiH COW iHC iH -OC»« CO
•U OV4JC >, JJO rHCO ' 4J 3 0) ^] Qj 4J CQ *fH LsH
"OtflO JJ COi WE O"l-i/-s fflCDO
ao'co ^jjjo xw *-iooo)3u
CO XOW1-I Xl-l J-I14-I -HC rH CL. M U4 Ij
• JH^JJ& IH JJO T-4 UM CWZ >-(O O3 HOIra
E rJ O03 W-H-H -H3CM JJ-H-H OrH WH rHM OOJJ
COCO-H iHCO 3rH3 WWO UrH3 -HOI" G.iH CDO JJHW
WT3< JJ-H cjacr JJ w W-QO" jj>mai> >&. cos
V ?, —, 2. £ C 3 O 330) WOJO HC 0)X -HOX
cooi'O zu «s;pu)-i QjJca 0*0-11-1 2; >j •— ' P.I w otd sw,a

-------
o
•z.
Ill
u
UJ
H
o
DC
O.
is
ii
> 
r»

LU



LU
LU
_J
LU
LU
-1


LU
>
LU
_)
LU
>
LU

H
'
LU
LU
_J
LU

LU
0)
0) -,-
*~ O
> CC
u. a.
LU
CO 5
•*• 5
CD 5
> to
U. UJ






UJ
cc
3

LU
LU
P
1-
UJ
^r
CO
Q.
S
O
(J
U


ca













LA 1— i




m r-<


0 0
t











1
1 1


•O 60
- c ,Q. . .
ZWO > OC4-I4JCU 1
>.4J CUCOOS'-HCB-HLj
co»a« oic 4JTD.-I
t5 S 1 H 0 CCCtOCD/^.
C3OT3 U -H OCUCU3-C ,
CU-HI60 O4J EGCT^O i
U £ O 0) CO 4JCUE tJ -H
HTSNDi 3rHad V4rHO»O4J
COS OI3EOaO605'cfl
1-HCJOI4J 360-H O.SCUS4J'4J
ca cam oiu OIMC^-HOIS
S)-i o u-4 cd o ai 4J c QJ
OO«O. O4J C 0) iH • Es
•H WJ B O. T3-H 4J i-( • CO •> 3
4-1 3305 4JSC S O CU M
COW-HCOS ECflO OIC02EO4J
zcu^ o cu S Ewsoscn
COiHO-H BO) COOI^,-HCflS fiOf'"*
EXX4JCO aO4J CDI-ICO4-1LJ-H' UtLO
i-(r— li-i«H OSSCU60CQ3 *^^^
OtflJ-lSCJ rHCOOl CO.OT3i4-ICOT3 •
lueoioai OI-O-H ra.i-iS'cocos'
w<5aacLiQ >-Hja <;;euco *-* to co :
cu nj 3 s
Pi Q O <3 '














































oo
!*•»
1
s
CM
O
CM
E
^

Q.
LU

-------
o
z
UJ
o
01
h-
o
DC
a.
   =
   <
    UJ
    s
    I
    CO
    O
    O
    O
   O
   LU
   Q
   'OC
   o
   u.

M O
.. CL
< O
Q §J
UJ ^
2 <




ai
O

_. d
O ui
I c













cs

^~
u
C
a
UJ
to
0)
0)
MDCODE)
Progress As
DECISION UNIT TITLE (AI
ends Monitoring and
^4
< H


to
z
Ul
X
CO

0.
O
u
u
H
_l
D


O
CO
en
LL






en
en
*~
3™
u.

CO
en
>.
u.



L
C
c
<
L
•
0
I
I
f
K
u
«:
•
(
C
«
*
C
C
c

c

Ul
Ul
J
Ul
Ul
~*

j
(
Ul
^
Ul
d
Ul

Ul
J
d
Ul
Ul
_J
Ul
>
Ul
_J

_J-
o
(T
a.
Ul
^
1
h-
(A
Ul



U
C
0
J
j
3
u
j
y
J
:
o
j
L
>
5
j

a














t— i i-H PO in o
P^.
m

^i -H m m m
fv. JNJ
fO

tH O CO ® O
0
CN












n
rn ° °
co i in -H
a) 5 c id . « r. u
•C D • O E T3 4J cO
so 4jcai -nSc-oalid o -a
1C r-l U-tUOOC'O'aU-l 4JCOT-I
ti iff1 •"* 50-0x1 oid«-iidai o OIH
c ai^^ ^caictd 4J c- a)4Jr-i/-v cojsajfl
3J4J b04JQr~- y-HjSid'M SOT wosocaJremcTN -4Jcn>
•HC CC-UON 1-I4J4J B) 0) IMC hCr^-r^ O-Htn
JS-H ^-IM-HT-I t-ic CMX: -HUD oJc-HMaocn Ss,^cd'
^i-ICa)*JCfci JS 0) -O Id
•UOS-H a)y-t (uu to tn-H4Jtoo JJUCQ
CT3 -HO) (UiH Vi "O >O COTT3CZ C -HCcO
OC CM^T) 30.EOC ow QJS.C-H.-H s « «w
3T3 O'wOli COE'Jl4-ilt! "H ^-SEOo>%Miwpo to H -H
5i^ tt'S'u M **'£,';£. (0° ^ -H u -H « c a> 20.1-103
•HE c<4-ico< 4J -HI-I o u m a) 1-1 
sooa) aic>-,a) ocosa) u H ooasycutnu cntoaow
4JCJ 4-ltOU.Q rHCOT-ICOCO-H 4-llfl r-l S-l-HO >, 4JECO
OJ-HM (o-oc aiTJjj'HO'iJ ye aicj-itou-arnco t-i-H-Ha)1
tiS3 "SliJL0 >-HcO>O03X a)(02 W4J4-iy-i
tooo O.3604J ai34Jai<tdcotd
3 U Z

!





















i
'














CO
CO
o
U-
-
a.
UJ

-------
o
2
UJ
O
u
LU
K
O
cr
c.
UJ  rr
>  &
z  w
UJH
    I
    to
    _J
    C.
    2
    O

    O
    z
    o
    Cfl
    o
    LU
    D
   O
   u.

•H oa
.. b.
< O
Q ?
UJ Q_
S <



05
O
O uj
X EC












f
CN
C
0
03
03
0)
0]
EC
^
CODE)
ogress
Ij
< -a
LU 10
*J
i- a
?^ c
h- u
i 2
O -H
DECISION
ends Mon
M
< H


H
Z
LU
Z
C/J
Zl
Ou
^—
1
U
u
LU
_l
D
D
O
CO
o>
>.
u.



-j
LU
Ul
UJ

UJ
~*

J
UJ
^
UJ
-J
J
UJ
Ul
I
i
=S
•J
LU
LU
j
LU
UJ
_J
en -,•
- o
> C
LL 0.
LU
g<
Lk. UJ





LU
MEASUR
e3
LU
K

^"
H-
z
LU
J/5
ACCOMPLI

ffi













O O 'n C?> »-H SO CM
12 O




O o m PO -H o O
o


O o m m o o o
o »








1
1
« 1 eg
U CO 03 -H 0)
01 O T3 lJ W -a
tfl 03-HCU CU-OtOCUlJ
2. £3U-IJ= 0303O)r»i J-J T3 0) ,
< -H 03 r-H S 4-1 03 030)4-1 '
Zto o >o 1-1 to to -Hex3
«J •UOC i-H-l-H-D 03OD.
U-l M 03 £U bC0030) W r-n S
OO E 03 3 OJ O CO O.  oi-oe
-HCJ>-, O -H SCO) 0) 0>>3-H|>
T3 OrH b > 4JC003 60*J -HOICli O < O
~ J CO EL U-13 CtO U^E CQj
< — c eoo-a i-i*j eio aiwb
0)^ 03 C C/30)!^ CCO 01to*o 01 *j bou (OO < w c ex:
•H*JC *j o O^HO b*-> 5^^4J
cnwcgco w o i-ioij H jooo cor-i
0) COQi-l WT3 03 20101 T30) C/3-Hb OCOO
x:uc4J oi oi Q*-> aix; --H -H j *->
b *JCD*H oi-i xi ooaw O-H OMX; oicoi nor •"
CXOOOJ-rH O 3 CMS bC -W4J 4JM4J U (fc U J
£ C 0) _Q *03 O • O O.b • W 10 CO
O OlUtfl OOl b OiHO S3 OCC *JC>,
U bOO. ZCrf H 2 *J *J Mb 2 M O M-HCO
4J b CO
OT (X U








































*_.
CO
CO
o
CN
1
o
u.

0.
LU

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO,          MEDIA:Air
 Financial Support to State and Local Agencies(A245REG  %     APPRO;A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       This  decision unit provides  major  financial  support  to  State  and  local
  air pollution agencies.   States,  in  partnership with  local agencies, will
  continue  to  be responsible for  implementation of  the  Clean Air  Act.  Emphasis
  will be on the implementation and the enforcement of  air  quality management
  programs,  including monitoring  and data collection.   Also, States  will
  implement  programs for  the review of new sources  and  adopt and  enforce
  the standards for  the expected  large increase in  the  number  of  NSPS and
  national emission  regulations for hazardous pollutants.  -

  C)    FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

       States  completed designations of non-attainment  areas and  began
  development  of  State Implementation  Plans  (SIPs)  revision; continued
  priority work on programs associated with  reviews of  new  and/or modified
  sources, new source performance standards, and national emission standards
  for hazardous air  pollution sources;  proceeded with  compliance and
  enforcement  work in the  non-attainment  areas; and began the  reorganization
  of  monitoring networks  in  accordance with SAMWG  recommendations.

       State and  local control  efforts have  concentrated on obtaining* compli-
  ance with particulate and sulphur  dioxide  regulations at  an  estimated
  22,600  Class  A  sources across the  country.  As of  mid-1977,  94  percent of
  Class A sources were complying with  final  emission limitations  or were
  meeting increments  in compliance  schedules.   The  Class A  source still  in
  violation were  for  the most part powerful  and recalicitrant  industries
  that will require  extensive resources to be brought into  compliance.   Since .
  compliance by these  large volume polluters is known to be a major factor in
  both attaining  and maintaining the primary National Ambient Air Quality
  Standard (NAAQS), State  and localities  continued  to concentrate on-Class A
  violators.   In  addition, the  control agencies have placed more  emphasis on
  compliance by Class  B sources, particularly those  in nonattainment areas.
  It  is estimated that about 130,000 Class B sources exist  in  nonattainment
  areas.

  D)    FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       States will concentrate on the revision of SIPs for non-attainment areas
  following the schedule set forth in CAA amendments in such a way as to
 minimize the  application of sanctions contained in the Act.   Emphasis will  be
  on programs for I/M, control of VOC from stationary sources and evaluation
  and regulation of  urban fugitive  dust.   Existing  EPA  PSD  regulations will be
  implemented, and State-specific PSD  regulations will  be adopted as part of
  the revision process.   Ambient  monitoring sites for adherence to SAMWG
  recommendations will be upgraded,  and a new daily reporting  mechanism
  will be developed  in conformance  with the Act.  There will be a continuous
  enforcement  effort to get Class A sources in  compliance with special
  emphasis  on  VOC stationary sources.  Preliminary  actions  to  implement
  inspection/maintenance  programs (I/M) will be undertaken.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM  21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          RG
A245  FINANCIAL  SUPPORT TO STATE  & LOCL  AGNCS( 1 OAPPROl ) A  & C

8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.  E.  FY  80 INCR    FY 80  CU*
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT         54.0         65.0         55.0         55.0
01  OF Ob             FTE                       92.6         78. «         78,4
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000.0)   65,000.0    75,000.0     56,025.0     56,025.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and  Benefits

         Because of  the  statutory requirement to provide 1/2% of  the  total grants
    to each State, this  level would provide support below the FY  1978  level for
    most major States.   This would force significant personnel cuts that would
    focus on new hires made with increased FY 1979 funds,  therefore,  the newer
    programs would be reduced most dramatically.  This includes I/M,  coordina-
    tion with MPOs,  VOC  control programs, enforcement, urban fugitive  dust
    and implementation of  PSD'regulations.  Most work schedules approved in
    FY 1979 as SIP submissions will not be able to be implemented, resulting
    in widespread SIP disapprovals.  No new Federal initiatives on SIPs or any
    other air pollution  program will be possible.
                                                                    «
         The NAMS (National Air Monitoring Stations) sites converted  in
    FY 1978-79 would continue  to be operated, but no new conversions would be
    possible in FY 1978  at this level.  Quality assurance programs would be
    implemented for  half of the State networks.  No additional implementation
    of the SLAMS (State  and Local Air Monitoring Stations)  would  be possible
    and the program  would  remain about 40% completed.  About half of  the legal
    minimum daily air quality reporting would be accomplished. Essentially no
    new work would be possible on the regional 03 studies needed  for  the 1982
    SIP.  No guidance or review would be provided on monitoring for PSD.

         Few States  would  continue to enforce EPA required regulations and
    enforcement and  inspections would proceed only on State regulated major
    S02 and TSP sources, excluding fugitive dust emissions.  Enforcement
    initiatives would not  be developed on VOC sources, in-use vehicles or
    non-leaded gasoline.  New source review would be limited to existing State
    emission limits  with about 10 States continuing to implement  their more
    complex PSD regulations.

         Ten or 15 States  with early progress and strong commitment to I/M would
    continue to implement  the work schedule approved in the SIP.  The  15 major
    urban areas with completed technical studies in FY 1979 on fugitive dust
    would terminate  or greatly reduce studies and fail to meet the work schedule.
    States would provide only minimum coordination to the designated MPOs,
    increasing the potential for inadequate transportation plan analyses.  About
    100 (out of 150) areas would complete or continue to implement SIPs for SO^
    and routine TSP  where  fugitive dust is not a major problem.  Except in
    isolated situations, work on lead and short term N0£ SIPs will be postponed.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Financial Support to.^tace and Local Agencies
  (a245)
                   HQ

                   REG.  X
MEDIA:  Air

APPRO:  A&C
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
                                                                     FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
01 Qr06

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


  Biree or four western  States receiving  large  increases  in  FY  1979 and FY 1980
  due  to  the  1/2% provision, will  initiate programs  on visibility  protection.
  Approximately half of  the States  that developed  regulations for  the 1979
  SIP  will complete the  regulation of the remaining 16 VOC  RACT source
  categories.

  Impact  of Not Funding  This Level

      Many States complain vigorously about Federal support falling  far
  behind  the  new programs required  by Federal law.   A reduction in support
  significantly below  (considering  inflation) that provided  in  FY  1978 prior
  to the  passage of the  CAA would result  in strong resentment and  could
  trigger important reprisals against air activities by many State legislatures
  and  administrations.   This would  multiply the impact of Federal  cuts and
  decrease greatly progress in air  pollution control with most  damage being
  done to the unpopular  regulatory  efforts on SIPs for ozone and new  source
  reviews.  This would lead to widespread SIP disapprovals and  application
  of sanctions, and require greatly increased EPA manpower to avoid complete
  failure of  the Clean Air Act.

      Not funding  this  level of State and local grants essentially would
  terminate the national air program  except for selected  programs  (e.g.,)
  new  motor vehicles fuels, new source emission standards and some enforcement.
         J21 3
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 ORM  2i DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          «6       «£DIA| AIR
A245  FINANCIAL  SUPPORT TO  STATE  &  LOCL  AGNCS(lOARPROi)A  &  C

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY ^79*C*  E.   FY%0 INCR*"*™
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT         Sa.O         65.0          10.0         65.0
02  OF  06             FTE                       92.6          1U.2         92.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     65,000.0    75,000.0      U,205.0     67,230,0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits

         SIPs for nearly all  areas designated non-attainment for SC>2 and  TSP SIPs
    where urban fugitive dust is not a  factor will be completed. Ten  urban
    areas will complete development of  the  data base for fugitive dust programs
    and remain on the SIP-approved work schedule.  Ten additional States  will
    write the required VOC RACT regulations for 16 new source categories.  Most
    States with I/M plans  approved in 1979 will remain on schedule.  States with
    I/M schedules disapproved in' 1978 will  not take new initiatives on I/M if
    funds are reduced.  Essentially no  SIPs will be completed on short term
    NC>2 or lead.  Two additional States will initiate work on visibility  protec-
    tion.
                                                                     t
         The identification and operation of an additional 200 NAMS sites
    (bringing the total to 1100!) is possible at this level of funding.   Emphasis
    will be on replacement of obsolete  and  unacceptable SO- instruments in
    emergy conversion areas.  An additional 25% of the legal minimum daily
    air quality reporting  would be implemented (total of 75%).  No additional
    State monitors will.be upgraded to  SLAMS minimum requirements.  Minimum
    quality assurance programs would be operated for the remaiming half of the
    States.  Guidance and  review programs for PSD monitoring will be undertaken
    •in half of the States.  No new network  or data development for short  term
    N02, lead, toxics, small  particle particulate or regional 03 SIPS  will be
    possible.

         Some States would begin to pursue  the development of VOC regulations for
    all sources and several others would develop programs for major VOC sources
    in urban areas only.  An  estimated  ten  additional States would agree  to
    implement PSD regulations or delegations.  Generally, States would, on a
    very limited basis, enforce regulations required by EPA including  fugitive
    dust, energy conversion,  lead, 111  (d), and continuous monitoring.

    Impact of Not Funding  This Level

         Any reduction in  support will  be perceived by State and local legisla-
    tures and administrations as a lack of  interest in air pollution by the
    Federal government. This could result  in severe cutbacks in State budgets
    and widespread pull back  from regulatory programs initiated in FY  1979.


                                                                    U21-J
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••a»••••••«•••»•*••<
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         RG        M£DIA|  AIR
A2«5  FINANCIAL SUPPORT  TO STATE 8, LOCL AGNCS(10APPROj)A  I C

8, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT  FY 79 C.  E.   FY  60  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL    '          OPFT          54.0          65,0          35.0         100.0
03 OF  06             FTE                        92.6          09.9         1«2.5
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)    65,000.0     75,000.0      9,660.0     76,910.0
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits

        Continuing of funding  at the FY 1979 level will essentially remove
   resource contraints from  all States that desire to fulfill  the work
   schedules approved in  1979  SIPs, except for large studies on  urban fugitive
   dusts.  This includes  programs for I/M, MPO coordination  (assuming continued
   funding under Section  175 grants) and VOC RACT regulations.   In addition,
   resources will be available to complete SIPs not funded in  FY 1979, except
   for the most resource  intensive study programs on fugitive  dusts.  Nearly
   all States willing to  undertake the new source review program will be able
   to develop and implement  PSD regulations.  Several new visibility protection
   programs will be initiated  and lead regulations completed for nonferrous
   smelters and for a few other major point sources.  Comprehensive SIPs
   for lead and short term N0£ SIPs will be developed in a few major urban
   areas.  Minimal efforts will be made on the design of regional ozone studies
   for the 1982 SIPs.

        The program of identification upgrading and operation  of the 1200 NAMS
   sites will be completed.  About-500. additional SLAMS can be approved,
   generally the inexpensive Hi-Vol and bubbler sites.   Daily  air quality
   reporting will be raised  to the legal minimum in all States.  Half of the
   States will upgrade the quality assurance program to the optimum level for
   all monitoring.

   Impact of Not Funding  This  Level

        States would continue  to enforce programs and regulations in place in
   FY 1979 but would not  accept new delegations nor the responsibility for
   new regulations or coverage under NSPs, NESHAPS,  new VOC RACT categories,
   urban fugitive dust lead  sources, fuels and in-use vehicles.,
               J
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 ORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          RG       MEDIA|  *IR
A2U5  FINANCIAL  SUPPORT TO STATE &  LOCL  AGNCSC 1OAPPRD|)A &  C

8,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY  8o"ciJM
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT         54.0         65.0                       100,0
0<«  OF 06             FTE                       92.6                       102.5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)    65,000.0    75,000.0      5,590.0     82,500,0
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     Description and Benefits

          The first  regional ozone studies will begin in the Northeast and
     Middle Atlantic including  study designs, equipment purchase for 03, N02> VOC
     and meteorologicalmeasurements, and initiation of the required complex
     emission inventories.  Studies on urban fugitive dust will be completed
     in 10 remaining major  urban non-attainment areas.  Several additional
     States will develop acceptable I/M programs.   Lead SIPs will be completed
     for all isolated point sources and all but a few urban areas.  Visibility
     protection "programs will be started in all major areas designated by DOI.
     Twenty-five small urban non-attainment areas will be provided limited
     funds for transportation planning.  All States willing to undertake new
     source review programs will have funds available for PSD activities.
          Data collection monitoring emission inventories will be undertaken for
     SIPs for the one hour standard for N02 in major urban areas.  Quality
     assurance programs  will be optimized for all urban areas.  An additional
     300 monitoring sites will be upgraded to SLAMS standards with emphasis on
     Oj and N02 in urban areas.  Several areas would be able to take over and
     routinely operate existing monitoring networks for inhalable particulate.


          States will accept additional delegation of NSPS and new source
     review responsibilities.  Initiatives would be taken by a number of
     States on tampering,  non-leaded fuels, continuous monitoring and on the
     anticipated large number of regulations for hazardous pollutants.
     Impact of Not Funding  This Level

          Not funding this  level would result in no preparation for 1982 SIP
     submittals;  failure to complete actions leading to acceptable lead and
     N02 SIPs; and continued high level of EPA-NSR activity because of lack
     of a new development.
                                                                   U21
   EPA. Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
        SION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          KG
A245  FINANCIAL SUPPORT  TO STATE  & LOCL AGNCSCIOAPPROI)A  & C

B*"RESOURCE"SUMMARY       FY  78  AtT  FY 79 c.  E,   PY ao  INCR    FY BO
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEI_              OPFT          ^a.O          65.0                       100.0
05  OF 06             PTE                        92.6                       1«2.5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)    65,000.0     75,000.0      7,500,0     90,000.0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     Description and Benefits

        Regional 03 studies will begin in the highly industrialized, high
     population zone along the Great Lakes.  Studies will be  initiated in an
     additional 10 urban areas on fugitive dust,  allowing them  to  develop
     acceptable SIPs or remain on the approved schedule.  Transportation plans
     will be developed in 25 non-attainment cities smaller than 200,000.
     Programs will be started in all .remaining visibility protection areas.  SIP
     development for N0£ and lead will be undertaken in all non-attainment areas.
     An additional 300 monitoring sites will be upgraded to SLAMS  quality with
     emphasis on urban CO instruments in order to facilitate  evaluation of
     the effectiveness of anticipated I/M program.  Limited support would be
     available for about five areas to establish a small baseline  monitoring
     network for toxic organics.  Increased State involvement in enforcement
     will be possible on new regulations with widespread activity  on VOC sources,
     initiation of work on fugitive dust sources and delegation of NSPS and
     NESHAPS.  Increasing numbers of States would develop an  enforcement
     program on non-leaded fuels, in-use vehicles, hazardous  pollutants and
     continuous monitoring.

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Not funding this level will result in inadequate preparation for 1982
     SIP submittal and incomplete visibility protection programs.
             021 -:
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



























z
tr
•A
>•
z ac
c <
i— r
t- r
U ZJ
US CO
c u;
tr u
c«L. CC
_i 3
« en
»- uj
z cr
IU
i »-
z •-•
0 Z
a. -s
> z
z o
UJ •—
CO
en —
IU U
»— ^
< C
CO •»
0
UJ £
»- tr
— o
z u.






















CO
2
^
M
J
UJ
3T

«—
a























































.»«•%
«o
a

IT.
O
«••
«•«
CO
u
r
C£

0


UJ
^
t-
co
e
o
a
a
*
«o
_J

«—
u
^
<
z
M>
ft.

IT
z^
<*J
*



9
CD
o-



CC
*> ^H
«*•• CO
u*

4
r
-V-








tu
„
c »—
cc «
O- J
— Z)
3£
Z>
l^


»•••
z
ur
o r
CO UJ
e> a:
OT* U
Z



•»•
CO
0- US
^-
o a:
— a
z:


CO <

o- »—
— o
"*






















c •>
• •
in ce
ru o
0 «
•c o
in — •
o as
in cc
ru o
e *
* «
•e c*
in —



O OS
• •
in cc
ru o
o -c
« o
•e v
in —

e cc
tn CD
ru o
o -a
» •»
•c e>
in ••




O O CD O9
in in ec in CB
ru ru o inr-
o o <
» •» »
o -c er
in in ••
%



e o «D 09
• » • • •
in in cc in co
ru ru o in r~
0 O -O
* % »
-o .co-
in in ••



o o o o -o
• • • • •
o o o in nj
o o tn 
o o ru
» o **
in in «
*" " "*

o eo o
o o o =r
o o m in
c ° »"
in in ru
 E <* —
3 O « •* CO
— < T I Z
e >- » o
•- Z x >• —
_, U) — UJ < ••
ai S3 «- >-• _J -•
> w *" W
UJ — — 3
_«c o a

o
•
c
1*1
ru
^r
*
e
o
fi
ru
^
fo
«



o
•
o
Kl
ru
^
fo
«

c
o
f\
ru
«
y^
^




O
o
f)
ni
^
P«
•a




o
•
m
o
ru
^
V*
~



0
»
o
o
o
^
in
»-

o
o
o
e
m
•o


f^
o
o
0
**
o
•UJ

0 «-D
3 O
ru < r
o
>- r
— 1 IU «
UJ •*£ >-*
> O
Ul Z<
_> a

^
•
o
p*t
in
iJT
ru
•c
o
Kl
in
^
ff\
ru



•e
m
O
f*l
m
^
Kl
ru

•o
o
p»
in
»
•^
ru




O * O •£
c o m ru
*o ft ^ o
rum
^ «
10. p*i
•e ru




o CD o ru
• • • •
in — o a-
o ru — —
ru o-
« «
•• VI
•



o e o «
• • • •
o o in ru
o in * »
o ru
« ^
- ru

o o o
e o 9
cm in
C f-
in ru
« - u. U
< o a c u.
a o •-«-
Z) es
I •» ••
< «- CO
cc z
— ef»O
X >• —
lu < »-
o* —i •«
•» ^
• *
9a

o
•
o
IP*
e>
«
"
O
o
««•>
o
%
^>
t*«



o
*
0
«•
*>
^
•e
f^.

0
o
v»
^
<*
*o
^




o
0
••
^
•»
4
lw




o
•
o
cc
•c
ill
{^




o
*
o
o
o
•fe
in
^

o
o
e
o
in
*


*^
o
o
0
•*
o
• (^
IL. zr *o
o — ~
3 v
•** < T
e
•• j
_• u. —
Uj 5 o*
s ^
w« —
_ c.

«
•
CO
v%
o-
«
ru
«
«o*
v«
c^
«
^
AJ



*
•
CO
»*
o
«
«
ru

*
CD
^»
c>
«
«
ru




o -a o in
o c o ru
-• — o a
o- o- — —
» %
•a -f
r- ru




oo o e>
• • • •
o ec in o
CD CD p*> =J
^ »t
» «
fr f^




O O O 4>
• • • •
o o tr> m
o in « cr-
o ru
^ ^
tn 4S
»na

00 0
o o v
o in tn
S> »"
tn ru
« ru





»»
•-u.it;
* e c. o u.
« = »» —

z^ * ••
< *^ ^>
cc z
»- « c
w ^ M«
LH ^ ^
•^ ^f ~*
^ CO
Z v
"* -^

0
•
0
o
in
ru
CD
O
e
o
in
*
ru
co



o
•
e
o
in
^
ru
CE

o
e
c
in
%
ru
CC




o
o
o
in
*
ru
CD




0
•
O
o
in
 ^J
tu 17
_£

^.
«
in

CD
CD
ru
.
in

CO
^
ec
ru



•P*
«
in
r-
co
^
CD
ru

„
m

co
«
to
ru




o — o tn
o in e ru
Of- O7
•nee — —

ruco
CD ru




om

s -o
tr in
mo ».
Ik *
in —




o o o •*>
• • •> •
o o in ni
o in < e*
o ru
^ M
in-c
i- ru

o o o
00 0
oin in
Of--
inru
•ont





^
I— U. Ul
< o a o u.
a o >- ^
o o
I w» *•

ec z
•- CO O
X >• —
Ul « •-
N^ ^ *M
— CO
ZJ C
o a

e —
• •
e c
o c
o in
e —
& *^
o —
e o
c o
o m

e —
C^ f*^



o —
«> t>
o c
=- e
o m
^ ^
c <~
O K1

0 -
C 0

o in
^ »
c •»
1? K>




C O —
O CO
o o o
o cm
•k •» «.
e o —
9" C* t^




0 00

o o m
o o ru
m in -o
*k *k ••>
^» fo ru




e oo

o o e
o cm
o e ru
o •» •>
m in -e
r~ f~ ru

0 00
O OS
o o m
0 S to
in inru
•o -c ru


^g,
0
O
O
o» »—
o < o o.
•UJ C£ O
u. S «o S o

r> o < — «r
in < r ce z
c •— to c
•^ z x >>•••>
_l Ul •— Ul < •—

^ ^ ^ CO
uj 5 z> e
-i ec o a
CO
I*.
1
1
o-
c
























































































o ***
W f


-------
z  a.
c  «
—  T
C  Ul
a  u
c.  £r
    z>
_l  O
«  in
1-  UJ
z  a
hJ
I  •-
Z  •-
o  z
«£  =>

>  r
z  c
u. r     in
•-a     o
          VJ

          o
          o
          a
          a
          u
      10 Z
      z  «
      o z
      f—l ••*
      a u.
      ui
      cc in
          9
      •- fa
      CL  «
                 o- «
                 •-• CO
                    U!
                 C Z
                 O* «
                 — Z
                    Z
o-  _/
—  Z)
                 o z
                to UJ
                a  a
                 — o
O- UJ
r^
O- 0:
                C- «
                f^ —
                o-  t-
              o in
               •  •
              O «M
                             in 
-------
u


LU

O
O
UJ
r-

o
cc
a.
LU
>  w
Z  t/S

LUH


    LU
    e/5
    O
    u
    u
    <
    g

    to

    u
    LU
    'tr
    O


l-l C
•H v>

O m
H -a-
CN
H «fl
0
Cu C/5
Pi W
*•"*} h**4

z
iJ U
-3


_
LU
Q
O
u
o
•z

w
LU
1
^

r-
z

Z
O
O
UJ
O

<




M
Z
LU
Z
CO
a.
S
O
u
3
UJ
2
•^
2

o
00
en
^.
u.







LU
LU
4
'
LU
LU
«J
J
_J
LU

LU
_l
j
LU
^
LU
-1
H
LU
^
LU
_|
j
LU
^
LU


en
en _,•
*~ O
> cc
U. Q.


«5
o «E

^ JT
U— UJ






UJ
CC
D

^
UJ
cS

_j
IB.


«
Z
UJ
s
I
en
OMPLI
U
U
^

CO



m ~T vr.
m mm
rH ST CN
O rH VC
sr mm
rH •* CN

m  1-^0
C CN o
oo -a- CN

LO *«^ ^D
m mm
rH ^ CN
oo m sr
m CN rH
-T rH
1^1 »^ vfi
m mm
rH S3" CN
oo o sr
<• ON rH
m rH »


•3- VO
m m
•3- CN
•^ rH* -T
Z 00 rH
CN rH


< < < '
Z Z ^




1 0)
C >
0 iH
^ O 4J
J2 iH
CU 00 •*
C TJ W 3 3
O Q) H U-i O
CM I4H
*o "H o *o oo
TJ 0) E -H C C 01
01 81 Ij h CO -H C
> CO 01 O) -O -H
tH A 4J U 01 3 (TJ
01 01 C 01 rH J-l
o w -o M -H u c
41 -H 00 X O
S-i CD UH 0) 0) TJ O
)-l CO O U ^^ 4)
to oi oi co jj a. .
C J )- • MO] UrHOl
cOEcO-P J-l 0) iHCOOl
rH 3 CL 01-H-- S C
O.CMOI oo ,n .0 o
O rH 0) . 3 DM 4J
>MH 01 O -1J 01 01 01
*J (d 03 • MCflcO JSO>
rHOrH- G-UM p^cO'H
iHEHU~JOU3COHWE < -. . —
•o o co )9^ -,
"H • rH 4J • •*)£.£.*
03 M CN O M ^3 PQ
iH • O IH 3 pb, •
S» Z C/3 4J "O =S= Z




























































e?
S

-------
o


UJ
z

g


o
UJ
H
o
CC
a.
E  S


Z  C/5

UJK


    LU
    u
    o
    g

    to

    u
    O
    LL


•H kj
.. ol
< O
O n
UJ a.
5 <






x


C3
O UJ
X CC






o


Q
~z

H
H
eo

O
H
H
OS
o ^
Q-I m
ft-t -*3-
S CM
W <
tJ
< C/3
M fcJ
CJ HH
Z U
< Z
2* £x3
M e>
fa <

«-~
LU
Q
O
U
a
2
^
^•"
LU

H
^»
1-
Z
3
^
DECISIOC

<


tt>
Z
LU
X
CO

0.

SE
u
0
UJ
H
-J
**"t
•g

§
o>

>-
u.







_J
UJ
LU

LU
LU




_J
LU

UJ

_,
UJ
^
UJ



•J
LU
^
LU

.
i
UJ
UJ
J

s
en -,•
1— Q
x^. ii
U. 0.

LU

CO <
? i
>- c/s
U. LU





LU
cc
3
CO
^
LU
2
00
LU

i_
•
^»
H
Z
LU
|
•^
CO
_l
ACCOMPI

00

NO
CM
i— 1



NO
rH
CM
rH


NO
rH
CM
rH



O
O
rH
rH


O
O






0
^
ON



C
o
VC




1
}^
o
u
y
to

C
•H
60
C
•H
u
to
^
0)
c.
o

NO O
rH O
CM O



NO O
1-4 O
CM r-.
rH CM


NO O
rH O
CM -> 3 -H
•u en 4J
u en co
C < 14
•H 01
-^ >. o.
o
CM ON
-3- CM

s



O NO
CM rH
^3"
N31

^g.
fx^




O rH
CM
-a-
^f
^





O rH
CM

-3-


O
CN
S3- rH
Sff

^g.
f^





^
r-.
(
^



























U
n


o
CM rH





^^.
^>


.
O
CM CO
-3- rH
*3'



-3"
'^"


1 x-v C
CO 0) o
U U -H
c c tn 4-1
0) CO 01 CO
E )-i -H M
33 -0 QJ
I-l 03 SO.
4J tB 4-1 O
03 < 03
C C
•H x o) e -H
'-' -u CO
•H O-H "O CB
J) rH N JJ Q) 01
3 CO O CO 4J M
S 3 4-J O *32
^ O* i— I C 3
4-1 o c/s to o) *a x
O -H
•a c E e eo
SrH WJ=C 03 O(0
S < 3 -<
< C/2 O1 hJ
z oo
£ TJ
U-l
1-.
01
1
1-1 C U-l
•H 60 4J O
3 60 0) M x-v 60 y
C K C CO C CD
01 -H -HO) -H i-(
y u UH -H O y
^ca OC-H o»vj -oc
3 CO 03 CO CO
00 PT3 LJ604J XV<
OJC OlrJ* OJ-HC T3fa
O-H xioc ,00101 3
C4-» £yo goi> we
10 i-l 3 y *H TJ *"r] C C/5 cfl
•^




























^
CD
00
CM
•—
i^
fsl
i
Z T3 w Z cC 4J z N*^ *H to CO 1^1


leu

-------














>
u
z
LU
o
z
g

i-
0
UJ

h-
o
cc
a.
_i
<
^
P™
2^
>
s5
S <
§1
= 1
> M
Z 05
UJ r~
z
LU
z
52
a.
. ACCOM
i—

Z
•D
Z
O
CO
U
LU
Q
4f
5
cc
o
LL


I* U
•H *Q
^ ^
.. a.'
< O
O Q_
LU a.
2 <



X

d
O LU








a
z


Ed
^4
•A
/~^
O "">
'—4 *w
CM
H <

X C/5
CM U
3 M
C/2 U
h-3 W
<: u
P
K. 7
>•-«
z u
23

LU
Q
O
U
Q
^
^
LU
_J
r-
H
H
Z
3
Z
0
CO
O
LU
0




C>O
z
LU
S
I
to
I!
O
o
o
LU
H
2
ID
s

§
en
^
LL








1
_J
LU
LU
H
j
LU
LU

1
LU
UJ
j
LU

LU
-1
M

^J
LU
LU
-1
J
Hi

LU
5*
LU
-J


^
o> -,-
^ O
^* cc
LL. d.

LU
t—
CO <
O) 2
r* "~
UB UJ



LU
cr
; &MEASU
UJ
J
•^
H
z
LU
2
T
OMPLISI
o
u
CD



m
OJ tH 00 ^0
00 *tf- oo \c i—'
r**- r^>. -^^ ^^.^ ^v^
•> -- m o o
O O . vO vO <•
O in rH

2J rH OO in
OO *£• CO vO vO
o m vo m o
O CM ^j-

°0 rH CO VO
r-- -J 00 VO rH
o -^. o o~ o"
O O vo *^" ro
rH

Os u-,
00 - rH 00 vO
r~ ^. -^. ^
rH -~, O m O
~ o m CM vo
vO
in
0\ rH OO VO
00 >* CO VO rH
^»« — m m o
f O rH i— 1 m

-3-


_ m
O rH 00 VO
^° 00 VO rH
"-- O o m m
•* m in r».
CM


< < < < <
z Z "z z~ "z



1 • !-l V C J-l
OIUH^V uj:g--^o si
>-iow C'aj-'3< 01 OG/-VJJ
iH4J OC«-HtOQjOO > -H CO h -H
sec -HSAJSOSP-I c c -H -a ^-'T-ig
C*OOI 4-iOCO -H O*J OJgcO^j
Olt-tg COT3-H
OUJON -t-i mov3 *jj= r< 3 4J coaaico
r>T3r»> 3rHr^ C8O -r(iJr C 0) 4J B3  COOJrH
COOrH>-l CO81T-I OlOrH 9) COO -H CU60CB
cuooob IScoSCV^-Hja S OIVM 4-1 ill h C C
O C UCU OOJJcd ^~-^ W u 4Jj3i-ICO
WfM-HOI HM^-HIWCOCJ QrH COO) COCOCUJ-l^l
3b C at O 4J Q) rH «H rH • CUrH  .OOIG •H4JOt3*Hi— IO
HHS3 CDH -UO-cfl VJQ rJ jS. UH >W0360cflO «.•-.
y ~* Cfll-l3UUH41 I-IC3SJ ]0 . •
••^ w ex xcuvjii)<;ya)a'Q.^'tJ-i
CS • X • C O. l-i JS
PQ i — !PQ cOCOOJid4JQiJ«
5^™ 2 — -^ t-) jj M w «
oz_ ez_ MCfflosa-x.














































CO
o
CN
£
5
U-
CL


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO          MEDIA: Air
  Grants for Planning Controls in Carbon Monoxide and
  Photochemical Oxidant Non-attainment areas (A250) REG" *	APPRO: A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

      The objective of  this planning assistance program is  to  assist metro-
  politan areas where national ambient  air quality standards have not been
  attained in developing comprehensive  planning and growth  management pro-
  cesses which permit both attainment of standards and economic  development.
  The grants will provide funding  for planning  agencies to  participate in the
  development of revisions to the  State Implementation Plans for urban areas
  that have not attained the health-protective  primary standards for photo-
  chemical oxidants and/or carbon  monoxide.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      This  program did not exist in FY  1978,  so  this  section  is  not
  applicable.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
      Grants  will be  awarded  to  approximately  100 organizations of  local
  elected officials in  areas  having more  than  200,000 population and  to
  organizations  in selected  smaller areas where  local transportation  related
  sources contribute  materially  to air  quality standard violations  for carbon
  monoxide and oxidants.   To  be  eligible  for grants, these organizations must.
  be  designated  by the  Governor   as having major responsibility in plan
  development and implementation.  These  funds will supplement transportation
  planning funds provided  by  the Department of Transportation to the  same
  agencies.   During FY  1979,  the urbanized areas designated non-attainment
  for oxidants and/or carbon  monoxide must follow a continuous, phased implemen
  tation  of transportation control measures.   Air quality related transporta-
  tion measures  must  be included in the Transportation Improvement  Program
  (TIP) and the  Annual  Element required by the U.S. Department of Transporta-
  tion.   Grants  under this decision unit  support the implementation of this
  process.  It is expected that  non-attainment areas will have approved
  processes and  schedules  for developing  transportation control measures by the
  end of  FY 1979.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      2J DECISION UNIT  LEV£L  ANALYSIS
 ,.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          «G       HEDIA*  AIR
A250  GRTS  FOR PLNG CARB MONOX &  PHQTOCHEH OX  CTApPROi  A  > C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 C. E.  ?Y 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
01  OF oa             FTE
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000,0)                  25,000,0     25,000.0     25,000.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       These  grants will provide funding for  planning agencies  to participate
    in  the development of revisions to the State Implementation  Plans for urban
    areas  that have not attained the health protective primary standards for
    photochemical oxidants and/or carbon monoxide.

       The Act  stipulates that there can be no construction  or  modification of
    major  pollution sources where States do not adopt  acceptable plan revision.
    A possible prohibition on  growth of major  stationary sources creates the
    potential  for adverse economic impacts in  the nation's  urban areas, especially
    the central  cities.

       The grants  to be provided under this decision  unit  will  fund  the planning
    process to which a commitment is made as part of the January 1979 SIP sub-
    mission.   This  planning and regulatory program development process will only
    be  carried out  if adequately funded.  Although DOT planning  funds will
    supplement the  resources for the planning  process, such funds are not
    sufficient given the magnitude and timing  of the work.  The  planning process
    is  expected  to  result in control measures  that will be  adopted and imple-
    mented by  local governments (which are the only ones which can assure proper
    implementation  given_the nature of the control measures),leading  to attain-
    mentTof the  NAAQS  in a time-frame consistent with  the Act's  mandate.

    and urban areas will not be adversely affected.
        The air quality planning activities necessary to implement  the  Clean Air
    Act's SIP revision process involves development and evaluation  of longer
    range alternative growth and transportation system strategies;  development
    and evaluation  of shorter range transportation improvement packages (includ-
    ing contingency packages to best insure timely attainment of standards); a
    well managed transportation planning and programming process geared toward
    a regulatory product  that best insures implementation of key measures;  and
    new planning and evaluation activities that stress not only detailed air
    quality assessment, but also extensive consultation activities  (with other
    agencies, interest groups, and elected officials) needed for coordination,
    support and timely implementation of strategies.

        The organizations of local elected officials will develop appropriate
    data bases on ambient air quality and emissions, as well as assess  the
    impacts on air  quality (by using sophisticated computer models) of  changes  in
    transportation  systems.  As a result of these assessments, control  measures
    will be adopted as formal regulatory provisions of the SIPs.  Measures  that
    will have to be consodered include:  motor vehicle emissions inspection and
  EPA Form 2410O1 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
                                                   HQ
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)  continued
Grants for Planning Controls in Carbon Monoxide
& Photochemical Oxidant Non-attainment Areas (A250fEG-
                                                        X
MEDIA:  Air

APPRO:  A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                              FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
01 QF04

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 maintenance; control of vapor emissions  from fuel transfer and storage
 operations  using solvents; improved public transit; exclusive bus and carpool
 lanes and areawide carpools; long-range  transit  improvements involving new
 transportation policies and transportation facilities or major changes in
 existing facilities and operations of existing parking facilities for the
 purpose of  park-and-ride lots and fringe parking; limitations of portions of
 road surfaces  or certain sections of the metropolitan area to the use of
 common carriers, non-motorized vehicles  or pedestrian use, both as to time
 and place;  employer participation in programs to encourage carpooling, van-
 pooling, mass  transit, bicycling and walking; secure bicycle storage facil-
 ities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, for the convenience
 and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas; staggered
 hours of work; road user charges, tolls  or differential rates to discourage
 single occupancy automobile trips; control of extended idling of vehicles;
 improvements in traffic flow; conversion of fleet vehicles to cleaner engines
 or "fuels, or to otherwise  control fleet  vehicle  operations; retrofit of
 emission devices or controls on vehicles and engines, other than light duty
 vehicles, not  subject to emission standards; and additional methods or
 strategies  that will contribute to the reduction of mobile source related
 pollutants.

 Impact of Not  Funding This Level

     The planning process initiated with  FY 1979  funds will not be completed,
 since the full funding of  planning agencies will not have reached the level
 of $75.0 million provided  for the Clean  Air Act.  As a consequence the non-
 attainment  areas for photochemical oxidants and  carbon monoxide will not
 have adequate  SIPs for attainment of the NAAQS.  The attainment of the NAAQS
 will most likely be postponed indefinitely, subjecting large segments of  the
 population  to  air pollution that  is harmful to public health.  In addition,
 the potential  constraints  on growth provided by  the Act will not be avoided
 or minimized.  The Urban Policy will be  jeopardized, given the likely uneven
 burden that such restrictions will place on urban areas.
        J2U
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
 u
 z
cs
z a
o <
•- r
>- r
o o
UJ CO
t-
c nj
a u
a a:

_i o
« 
ID —I
uj u
en •.
   **i    n
o       _i
u. I    a
*- a.    f-
<-> o    o
      o »-
      •i ce
      s:  o
         ir.
      *-  ru
      ce  <
               CC
               o- »~
               — to
                  UJ
               o r
               ID UJ
               o- tr
                 CO
               o u
               0- E
                           o
                           o
                          in
                          CM
                                                                                                                                                              . I
                                                                                                                                                              o-
                                                                                                                                                               o
                                   O
                                   O
                          in
                          rw
                          o

                          o
                                   o
                                   c
                                   in
                          in       t-
                          M
                          o       e
                           •        •
                          o       c
                          c       o
                          c       in
                          c
                          o
                          o

                          in
                          CM
e
e
o

m
CM
                          O
                          o
                          e
      e e
      o e
      o in

      •n t-
      ru
                                o c
                                o o
                                e in
                                o o
                                o in
                                in r^
                                ru
                          o
                          o
                          O             V-
                          •S          k- u, I
                       *f  **    —» »^u. 0. i
                       C-       « O CL O I


                       U.  I «O ^ O


                       ~  5 O f — CO
                       —  -t I ce    z
                       c       *• co c
                          •- Z X >- M
                       _)  UJ — UJ •< >-
                       > o
                       UJ =2
        >- CO
        =) O
        o a.
                                                                                                                                         0211

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ          MEDIA: Air

  Stationary Source Enforcement A305                REG. XX      APPRO: Enf
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
  long Range Goal - Ensure that sources are in compliance with emission
limitations under SIPs; new sources are constructed in accordance with NSR,
NSPS, and PSD provisions, sources subject to NESHAPS meet hazardous pollutant
standards, and all applicable provisions of ESECA or any subsequent energy
bill are enforced.

  Objectives - Response to episodes under Section 303 emergency powers
             - Assist/encourage/supplement State and local enforcement efforts
             - Implement accelerated enforcement effort
             - Establish noncompliance penalty program
             - Issue PSD permits and review State NSR permits
             - Ensure all major sources are inspected annually
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

 • Approximately 88% of some 23,000 major sources regulated under SIPs should
  be in compliance with final emission regulations, 6% should be complying with
  incremental dates in compliance schedules, and the remaining are of unknown
  or violating status.
 • Issue 410 PSD and NSR permits.
 • Completed 2030 inspections.of stationary air sources.            *
 • Made 300 enforcement action(s) against violating sources.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

  The  stationary source enforcement program will continue its strong enforce-
ment efforts against recalcitrant major source violators and will begin to
focus  more on the compliance problems of violators of hydrocarbon regulations
in nonattainroent areas.  The new nonccmpliance penalty program will begin in
FY 1979,  making possible large numbers of adjudicatory hearings that will
necessitate large inputs of  federal resources.  Both in size and importance,
the new source program is expanding.  Much effort will be applied to issuing
PSD permits, ensuring new source comply with new and existing NSPS standards,
and reviewing State NSR permits for enforceability.  Attention will also be
given  to  examining in detail the field surveillance and compliance monitoring
programs  being implemented by States to ensure that violations of emission
limitations are being fully  documented.  Resources will also be applied to
enforcing the new and existing NESHAPS standards.
                                                                       J21-

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          RG       M£DIA| AIR
A305  STATIONARY  SRCE ENFORCEMENT                  APPRO! ENFORCEMENT

8,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY  SO INCR    FY 60  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT        311.0        381.0         312.0        312.0
 LEVEL              OPFT         21.0         22.0          22.0          22.0
01  OF 06             FTE                      400.7         377.9        377.9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     6,908.0      9,048.0       7,722.1      7,722.1
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description of Activities;  This minimal level represents the core of the
   Stationary Source Enforcement program without resource support for new and
   expanded enforcement activities created by  the Clean Air Act Amendments.
   However, a minimal level of activity has to be given to the accelerated
   enforcement effort, ncncompliance penalty determinations, compliance assurance
   with new NSPS, PSD, and NESHAPS regulations, and enforcement of new State
   Implementation Plans at the expense of  other activities.  Consequently, only
   the nondiscretionary duties can be performed for the remaining activities in
   this program.  For example, EPA must review SIP revisions and would review for
   enforceability, but superficially, at this  resource level.  EPA would implement
   NSR where there is no approved State programs, but there could be no signifi-
   cant overview of approved State programs.   EPA would implement PSD and NSPS
   where not delegated, but the Agency could only review to see if submissions
   were regular; on their face there would be  no capability to conduct or observe
   source tests.  Minimal functions required by ESECA would be conducted and EPA
   would have to carry out preconstruction review and waiver issuance for NESHAPS
   where there is no delegation.  Cnly an  exiguous number of inspections could tie
   iade on major SIP sources.

   Benefits of Approval;  This level would allow EPA to carry out the nondiscre-
    tionary duties it has under the Clean Air Act Amendments.  Minimal support can
      given to the accelerated enforcement effort and the new noncompliance
    penalty program can be implemented,  but only superficially.

    Consequences of Nonapproval;  This level represents the minimal program which
         justify the existence of a program.  The functions to be performed are
    generally such that affirmative action by EPA is required as a precondition to
    some other requirement:  for example,  a source could be confronted with a
    preconstruction review requirement (as in NESHAPS) and, where a State has not
    accepted delegation, there would be no permitting authority to go to.  Similar-
    ly, failure to implement our ESECA obligations would make it impossible for DOE
    to implement its coal conversion program.  Also, if this level is not approved,
    the Clean Air Act Amendments could not be implemented.  Consequently, air
    quality will degrade aggravating non-attainment areas and causing attainment
    areas to become non-attaining.  The Agency may be subjected to court suits for
    failure to enforce which will tie up additional program resources.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          KG       *EDIA|  AIH
A305  STATIONARY SRCE ENFORCEMENT                  APPRO|  ENFORCEMENT
* ** * * • • *• • • • V • • IB • iK • 4* IV VI •§ V • • • • • • • • • W W V • • • • • • M M M •• • ^ • ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^
8. RESOURCE  SUMMARY      FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.  FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT        3ii.o        SBI.O         ao.o        352.0
 LEVEL             OPFT          21.0"        22.0                      22.0
02 OF 06             FTE                      «00.7         20.0        397.9
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)     6,908.0      9,008.0        909.0      8,631.1
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


    Description of Activities;  At this resource  level, the basic program outlined
    in Level I would be supplemented primarily by giving resource relief to
    Regions (Regions II,  III, IV, and V) who have large workload burdens due to
    the Major Violators List  (accelerated enforcement effort).  Also,  additional
    emphasis can be placed on the implementation of the new nonccmpliance penalty
    program.  Some minimal assistance will be given for the enforcement of new
    SIPs.  This level will provide resources for programs designed to  ensure
    compliance with new NSPS, PSD, and NESHAPS regulations and with the new State
    Implementation Plans revisions.

    Benefits of Approval;  This level will allow minimal implementation of the
    new expanded programs due to the Clean Air Act Amendments which will provide
    more effective enforcement of new and existing SIPs.  Also, a minimal accept-
    able level of compliance will be ensured in expanded new source and hazardous
    air pollutants programs.

    Consequences of Nonapproval;  Failure to approve this level would mean that
    the Clean Air Act Amendments would only be weakly enforced by the Agency.
                                                                    U22
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         RQ
A305  STATIONARY  SRCE ENFORCEMENT                  APPP,0|  ENFORCEMENT
B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT  FY 79  C.  E.   FY8o
         POSITIONS   PFT         311.0         jai.o          37.0         339.0
.LEVEL              OPFT          21.0          22.0                        22|o
03 OF  Oto             FTE                       400.7          22.5         420. a
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000. 0)     6,908.0      9,048.0        829.7      9,460.6
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


    Description of Activities:  At this  resource level/ a more effective acceler-
    ated enforcement program will be implemented to ensure compliance with new and
    existing  SIPs, with new Agency initiatives in hydrocarbon control, and with
    new and existing NSPS, PSD, and NESHAPS regulations.  Also, additional liti-
    gation support would be provided through  the level of effort contracts pro-
    gram.   Minimal support can be given at this level for adjudicatory hearings •
    from the  noncompliance penalty program.   This level would provide the basic
    overview  for State NSR, NSPS, PSD,  and NESHAPS programs; however, there are no
    resources for complete on-site audits of  these programs.  Less than 10% of the
    major SIP source will be given an overview inspection and most of these
    inspections will be contracted out.

    Benefits  of Approval:  This level would provide more effective case develop-
    ment for the litigation produced by the accelerated enforcement effort.  The
    Agency will be able to handle,  in part, what is anticipated to be complex and
    resource intensive adjudicatory hearings for noncompliance penalty assessments
    appeals.  A basic overview and compliance monitoring programs will be  estab-
    lished to provide necessary data on program performance and compliance status.

    Consequence of Nonapproval:  Rejection of this -level would provide a  marginal
    accelerated enforcement effort and inadequate support to adjudicatory hearings
    Overview and understanding of State enforcement programs would be of  unaccept-
    able quality and the information on the  compliance status of major SIP sources
    would suffer.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          KG       M£DIAi  AIR
A305  STATIONARY SRCE  ENFORCEMENT                 APPRO|  ENFORCEMENT

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C. E,   FY 80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         311.0        3ftt.O           6,0        595,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          21.0         22,0                       22.0
04 OF  06            FTE       '               400.7           3.6        424.0
   BUDGET AUTH, (000.0)     6,908.0      9,048.0         139.1      9,599.9
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description of Activities;  This level will provide some resource relief for
    the accelerated enforcement effort; in particular, for civil referrals
    against major violators of new SIPs and hydrocarbon regulations.

    Benefits of Approval:  This level would provide sane assurance that major
    sources will be complying with new SIP revisions.

    Consequences of Nonapproval;  Failure to approve this level will weaken the
    accelerated enforcement effort and will cause Regions (mainly Region VI) who
    have major hydrocarbon problems to have a less than adequate enforcement
    program.
                                                                J22D
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------


















V
2
UJ
Ci

2 tr
c <
•1 Z
U -2
UJ CO
C UJ
a u
_l O
« CO
r- UJ
2 c:
UJ
Z *-
2 >->
O 2
a 3
> 2
2 C
UJ •—
CO
u> •->
Ul O
« c
CO —
c
UJ Z
r- IE
2 U.





















co
2
Q
M
O
UJ
•; 7 tr
_ i
»~
a





















































»—
2
X
U
u
tr
c
u.
UJ
UJ
tr
CO
>_
tr
^
2
O
M
^-
<
f-
co
Ln
C
K>


a
CO
O

ec
o —
— • CO
*-
«
5t
*-
CO

M 13
ec 2
0 t-
^ 2
2

O.

»•«
CO
o






u.
(•N
o •-
CC «
0 _J

=>
«_1


-
U.'
o x
X' UJ
o or
_ _>



*-
o uj
r-
o o:
»*a
.?
_j
r- 3
O t-
"























M in
M O
r- r-
r- 4>
• •
M in
M O
r- r-
r*. - «-*
Ij U 3« j w
> o ^* to
UJ => O O
_J CC O O.
«M K) CC 9 O
*• in o in o
rt o * M O
« in 9 KI in
co r- o cc o
• • • • •
^* m o in o
f\ O •£ fV O
« in 9 r»i in
co r- o co o

«- m co 9 o
• • • • •
-* in o in o
mo -CM o
^ in 9 K> in
» « » « »
co r- o cc o

v-t K> CC 9 O
• • • • •
— m o in o
r<1 o -O M O
« « . . .
co r- o x o




— — = Kl O O O CCCOO9OC9 OOC
«oSoS~o SmMM£~S ? * M
•& ^ lf*i »*> P1^ 9 9 f*l >*\ 57 |T* 4T1
tk. » tf> ru *— ru o to ic rv> —• c\) o oo o
90 -O «J *\J O 99 ^>0«\JO 99
O O C1 K1 9 O O C1 Kl 9 CO
^«k «> «fc »k Cb (k
oor- oor- oo
00 00-0 00 000 00
TC*fl«» O^"3Z

M^Xtt 2 K*-i>^ ^-2X>-*^ >-2X
jJljCHiljlZ u5S~^ j!™ uiu3iii
>C •-« >C r-CO >c
ujz> .^o uJ2 3c uj3
_/ CD o a. _jtc oa. _]• a
cc
r-
9
w
CC
•
r*-
9
**
CC

CO
•
r-~
9
9
Ik.
c

0
m
r—
9
*
CO




CO
r--
a*
^
cc




9
M
M
«•»





M
M
O
O
Ik
r-
o
C1
r^.
o
*








»•%
o
o
e
^
«»,*•

03
>-
*
«_
*
O




























o o o
SJSS
r*l 9






o *
•C K)







o o r-
-.«*) 0
CO M O
KI a


e o
» •>
— M
tO








H- U. UJ
•A. CL *•
Du O i
-------
o
z
UJ
C3
<

Z
o


o
UJ
I-
O
CC
Q.
Is
ED
   C/5
UJ
   z
   'CC
   o
          W
       O ui
       X CC
       H

       Z
       3

       Z
             Ul
                Ul
                Ul
             en
>i
U. Q.
TLE & MEASURE
 Z
 ui
 5
 X
 (/5

 _J
 Q.


 O
 u
 o
 <

 CD
                                         00
                                         co
                                                            in
                       CN
                       O
                       CO
                       *J
                       «"}
                       (N
                                 oo
                                         oo
                                         CO
                                                            LO
                       o
                       CO
                       en
                                  oo
                                                      m
                                               m
                                               m
                       o
                       CO
                     CO
                     f>
LO
VO
in
o\
oo
o\
                                                       o
                                                       oo
                       o
                       m
                       (N
                                o
                                tn
                                591
        o
        m
        OO
      o
      r*
      in
        o
        o
                       W
                          g
                       §§
                       y '""!
                      •* -U
                       (OO
                         •"-<
                                                       8

                                                       «
                                                       4-!
                                                                    CO


                                                                    (N



                                                                    O



                                                                    CN
                                                                                                                  0

                                                                                                                 U.
                                                                                                                 O.

                                                                                                                 UJ

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQXX        MEDIA:  Air

   Stationary Source  Enforcement A305                REG.         APPRO:  Enf
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

   long  Range Goal - Ensure  that sources are in compliance with emission
 limitations under SIPs; new sources are constructed in accordance with NSR,
 NSPS, and  PSD provisions, sources subject to NESHAPS meet hazardous pollutant
 standards, and all applicable provisions of ESECA or any subsequent energy
 bill are enforced.

   Objectives - Response to  episodes under Section 303 emergency powers
             - Assist/encourage/supplement State and local enforcement efforts
             - Implement accelerated enforcement effort
             - Establish noncompliance penalty program
             - Issue PSD permits and review State NSR permits
             - Ensure  all major sources are inspected annually
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
   Approximately 88% of some 23,000 major sources regulated under SIPs should
   be in compliance with final emissions regulations, 6% should be complying
   with  incremental dates in compliance schedules, and the remaining are of
   unknown  or violating status.
   Reviewed or provided assistance to 146 litigation actions.        •
   119 DCO's were reviewed for issues of national significance.
   Manage $5.5 million  contract program.
   Provided legal/technical  assistance to the ten Regional offices.
   Made  program reviews of all ten Regional stationary source enforcement
   programs.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

   The  stationary  source enforcement program will continue  its strong enforce-
ment efforts against recalcitrant major  source violators and will begin  to
focus  more  on the compliance problems of violators of hydrocarbon regulations
in nonattainment  areas.   Much effort will be given to assisting and reviewing
this accelerated  enforcement effort.  Also, large inputs of federal resources
are needed  to provide guidance and support for adjudicatory hearings produced
by the new  noncompliance  penalty program.  In FY 1979,  there will be many new
regulations (NSPS, NESHAPS, etc) that will be promulgated  which will have to be
reviewed  for national issues and enforceability.  The level of effort  contracts
program which will be used for enforcement case development, compliance  monitor-
ing and field surveillance, regional industrial technical  and economic studies,
national  profiles and enforcement strategy studies, and management and technical
data support will increase to $12.5 million, creating over 1000 contract tasks
that must be initiated and coordinated.
       J22J
EPA Form 2410-10 (S-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 ORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE         HQ       MEDIA|  AIR
AJ05  STATIONARY  SRCE ENFORCEMENT                  APPROf  ENFORCEMENT

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E,   ?Y  80  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          72.0          90.0          68.0          68.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           7.0           9.0           7.0           7.0
01  OF  05             FTE                        99.8          89.0          89.0
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)      8,792.0     15,525.7     11,673.0     11,673.0
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    DESCRIPTICN OF ACTIVITIES
       This base level will provide national program management and serve as a
    coordinating center for Regional and State enforcement functions.  Establish
    program priorities, direction, strategy, and assure nationally consistent
    enforcement of  the Regional and State programs.  Assess the effectiveness of
    the nationwide  program and recommend corrective  measures.  Coordinate with
    other agencies  on matters impacting this program.  Provide support and
    guidance to Regional and State programs.  NEIC will provide technical support
    for specific case development.  Major activities include:

       Support for  enforcement actions in emergency  situations involving
       substantial  threats to public health and safety.               *

      - Develop and implement emergency procedures.

      - Respond to  enforcement requests for actions  against unregulated toxic
        pollutants.

      - NEIC will make laboratory analysis and evaluation for specific case
        development.

      - NEIC will provide evaluation of evidence,  preparation of material for
        referral to DCJ, litigation support including testimony by participants,
        and necessary follow-up investigation for specific Regional cases.
      - NEIC will perform field investigations for specific case development.

      - Administration of level of effort contracts  program.

       Support for  the enforcement program against major source violators of the
       Clean Air Act.
      - Provide legal/technical/policy assistance for case development,
        enforcement strategy, litigation, and settlement.

      - Provide guidance and participate in exanded  enforcement programs mandated
         by the SIP revisions.

      - Assist and  review on the applicability of NSPS, Offset, and PSD
        to specific sources.

      - Develop guidance, recommendations, and advice for implementing energy
         related programs.

      - Assure a nationally consistent data system through the management of CDS.

      - Assessment  and review of Regional programs.                     J2v J
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

     FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
LEVEL
1 OF 5
(Continued)
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















J2:
      A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

         STATIONARY SOURCE  ENFORCEMENT A305
                                                  HQ XX

                                                  REG.
MEDIA:   Air

APPRO:   Enf
      B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                              FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCH.
      FY 80 CUM.
 C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
   OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   -  NEIC will  perform  field  investigations for  specific  case  development.

   -  NEIC will  make  laboratory analysis  and evaluation for  specific  case
     development.
   -  NEIC will  provide  evaluation of evidence, preparation  of  material for
     referral to DOJ, litigation  support including  testimony by  participants,,
     and necessary follow-up  investigation for specific Regional cases.

   -  Administration  of .level  of effort contracts program.

   Enforcement  aspects  of SIP revisions  under the Clean Air Act  Amendments.

 - Development  and review of  Federal regulations; review  for enforceability
   of SIP revisions.                                               *

   Support for  enforcement of National Emission  Standards for  Hazardous Air
   Pollutants.

 - Assist and review on the applicability of NESHAPS.

 - NEIC will provide evaluation of evidence, preparation  of material for
   referral to  DOJ,  litigation support including testimony  by  participants,
   and  necessary follow-up investigation for specific Regional cases.

   Support for  enforcement against federal facilities.

 - Provide guidance  and review enforcement related  documents.

   Level of Effect Contract Funds Included;

   $5,300,000 for  enforcement case development,  $3,000,000  for compliance moni
 toring and field  surveillance, $400,000 for regional industrial technical and
 economic studies, $200,000 for national profiles and enforcement strategy
 studies, and $365,000  for data support.

 BENEFITS OF APPROVAL

 - Funding this base level will make available inadequate national management
   of this federal program.  This level  will ensure some  Regional consistency
   and  will provide  a focal point for  program assistance, review and coordi-
   nation, and  also  will provide  a minimal degree of NEIC technical  support
   in case preparations.   However, this  level will  not provide adequate suppor
"  to new and expanded  programs created  by the Clean Air  Act Amendments.
    EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

    STATIONARY SOUPCE ENFORCEMENT A305
                                     HQ  XX

                                     REG.
MEDIA: Air

APPRO: Enf
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                  FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 (NCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL
  —I— OF—*-
  (Continued)
               POSITIONS
              PFT
                           OPFT
                            FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


CONSEQUENCES  OF N3NAPPROVRL
- Not  funding  this level would eliminate headquarters support and management
  of Regional  and  State programs;  also,  it would eliminate NEIC technical
  support for  specific case development; and consequently, would undermine
  the  Stationary Source Enforcement Program.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA|  AIR
A305  STATIONARY  SRCE ENFORCEMENT                 APPRO»  ENFORCEMENT

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C.  E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          72,0          96.0   '       13.0         81.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           7.0           9,0           2.0           9,0
02  OF  05             FTE                        99.8           9,3         98,3
    BUDGET  AUTH.  COOO.O)     8,792.0     15,525.7      2,336.0     14,009,0
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

        Support for enforcement actions in emergency situations  involving
        substantial threats to public health and safety

         - NEIC and headquarters would be capable of providing  more comprehensive
           assistance for emergency actions.

        Support for the enforcement program against major source violators of the
        Clean Air Act.

        -  Provide legal assistance in expanded enforcement programs due to
           the new SIP revisions.   In particular, develop and defend regulations
           for noncompliance penalty program and smelter orders, and provide
           legal and technical support to accelerated enforcement effort.

        -  Provide economic assistance as part of general enforcement support
           and, in particular, for noncompliance penalties,  civil penalties,
           and smelter orders.
        -  Ensure adequate management of the greatly expanded level of  effort
           contract program.
        -  Provide adequate review of the growing number of regulations and
           standards,  in particular, increased number of source  categories for
           NSPS.
        -  NEIC will be able to perform more field investigations, laboratory
           analysis, litigation support and follow-up investigation to  support
           the increased number of case preparations due to accelerated enforcement
           program.

        Support for the enforcement of National Emission Standards for  Hazardous
        Air Pollutants.

         - Provide legal/technical assistance and guidance for  the enforcement
           of new benzene standard.

         - Provide adequate review of the growing number of regulations and
           standards for NESHAPS,  in particular, for new coke oven emission
           standard and new arsenic standard.

         - NEIC will provide more support in enforcement actions against NESHAPS
           sources.
        J£ V O
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

    STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT A305
                                     HQ XX

                                     REG.
MEDIA: Air

APPRO:
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                  FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL
      OF-
  (Continued)
               POSITIONS
              PFT
                           OPFT
                            FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Level of Effort  Contract Funds Included;

    $1,240,000 for compliance monitoring and field  surveillance,  $340,000 for
 regional industrial technical and economic studies,  $195,000 for national
 profiles and enforcement strategy studies,  and $80,000 for data support.

 BENEFITS OF APPROVAL
      - Funding this level will ensure seme headquarters assistance and support
        to expanded programs due to new SIP revisions.   Economic assistance
        would be provided for noncompliance penalties,  civil penalties, and
        smelter orders.   Some legal assistance would be given to the non-
        compliance penalty program and an adequate review of the growing number
        of new regulations would be given.  Also,  the contracts program would
        be managed adequately.   Finally, NEIC would complete additional full-
        scale case preparations and provide more needed technical support to
        the Regions.

 CONSEQUENCES OF NONAPPROVAL
      - Not funding this level would eliminate additional headquarters assis-
        tance and support to programs that have expanded significantly due to
        new SIP revisions and new regulations.   This would mean inadequate
        national management of the noncompliance penalty program.   There would
        be no economic assistance from headquarters and the contracts program
        would be poorly managed.   In many instances there would be unsatisfac-
        tory reviews of regulations and SIP revisions.   NEIC would not be able
        to give the needed additional technical support.  Also, an additional
        $1,855,000 in contract funds would be eliminated.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2s DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
      • * V • V • • •• W • W • • • • V •• • • • • • 4W • • A M


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

     STATIONARY SOURCE  ENFORCEMENT A305
                    HO. XX

                    REG.
MEDIA:  Air
APPRO:
     .  Enf
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
(Continued)
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  CONSEQUENCES OF NONAPPROVAL

       - Not funding this level would eliminate the additional investigative
         assistance by NEIC and the needed additional Headquarters assistance
         and support to expanded enforcement programs.  This would mean inade-
         quate headquarters support to adjudicatory hearings.  Inadequate
         legal/ technical support to new source programs.  Also, NEIC will not
         be able to provide the needed additional technical support to the
         Regions.   Also, an additional $1,235,000 in contract funds would be
         eliminated. .
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)

-------
                          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
       A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

          STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT A305
                                                  HQ XX

                                                  REG.
MEDIA: Air

APPRO: Enf
       B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
                               FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
          LEVEL

       -A-OF-'
                    POSITIONS
                           PFT
                          OPFT
                           FTE
                   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
021
       C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
          OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

      DESCRIPTION OF  ACTIVITIES
         Support for the  enforcement program against major source violators of the
         Clean Air Act.

       Provide  legal assistance in expanded enforcement programs due to the new
       SIP  revisions.  In particular,  provide  guidance and support for noncomp-
       liance penalty program and the  associated  complex adjudicatory hearings and
       for  the  expanded  new source programs where there is not presently legal
       expertise.

       Provide  support in innovative technology areas  to assist in Sections lll(j)
       and  113(d)(4)  work.

       Provide  technical assistance in new Agency initiatives for hydrocarbon
       control.

         Support for the  enforcement of National Emission Standards for Hazardous
         Air Pollutants.

     - NEIC will provide, more support  in enforcement actions against NESHAPS
       sources  and  also  SIP sources.

     - Provide  legal  assistance in expanded enforcement programs due to the new
       SIP  revisions.  In particular,  provide  guidance and support in new NESHAPS
       programs.

     BENEFITS OF APPROVAL
      - Funding this level will  improve the quality of management  and  support to
       the Regions and States.   In particular,  support for the  initial adjudicatory
       hearing for noncompliance penalties that are anticipated to be long and
       ccmplicated.  Also, technical support for hydrocarbon  control  and innovative
       technology areas.  Additional support by NEIC for enforcement  actions
       against NESHAPS sources  will be given.

      XNSEQUENCES OF NCNAPPROVAL
- Not funding this level will eliminate needed support for adjudicatory
  hearings,  support for hydrocarbon control, and support in innovative
  technology assistance for Sections lll(j)  and 113(d)(4) work and will
» eliminate some legal assistance in new source and NESHAPS programs.
  Also,  the additional NEIC technical support would be eliminated.
     EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



















u
z
bj
U
^
>-
Z IE
O «
** I
•»- r
l-> 3
u> m
O bj
CE o
3
_J O
•a in
t- UJ
Z CE
bj
Z —
O 2
CE 3
> Z
z o
UJ •-
0}
CO «-•
UJ U
H- u;
« o
*-
Kl
O
UJ Z
>- o:
Z u.
3





»_
2
Ul
UJ
u
or
C
u.
Ul
UJ
u
e
i- a>
z
UJ >-
UJ «
«J Z
e e
o —
u. »-
Z *T
UJ r~
ao
<
•< in
o
ru KI
ru «

a
e
c-


t^
& *•*
— ID
bj
X
CO
bj
ru ca
cc z
O1 t-t
— z
<
o.


CD
{^
—





UJ
_
0 «-
0 <
0- _J

r
u


•-
u;
o x
CD UJ
o- a
«M t_>
2
»-l


CO
^ UJ
r»
o- a
— a:
^
o
CO <
r- =>
»• ^-
— u
























o ru
Kl fU
**- F*-
^ ru
•• o
c ru
KI ru
••«• !*»
« ru
— 0


o ru
• •
KI ru
f. r^
•c ru
— o


o ru
KI ru
f^ r~
-c ru
» ^
•• o



o o o ru o o o
KI — ru ru co r- o-
f^ ^* O f^ ^ CO
^ po KI ru
» * « »
— ru o- o
— —



o o o ru o o o
KI •* ru ru co r- o-
f» »^ o r«- >o ao
^ tfi f«^ nj
» ^ » «
— ru O- 0
•"" *•


r* in ru <& o o co
in o- «  x ^ o-
ir. — K, -c
^ ^ « *
in KI ru K>

o o o o o o
ru CD a r- iv r-
C^ KI in KI f*-
f- ,0 .. »»
cc ru * r-





^^
o
o
o <-
«% »- u. bJ
o < o a o u.
• UJ CE O ^^ *— '
U. I «0 Z 0
o •- = r •» —
3 C < »" CO
— < X CE Z
0 1— BO O
*- Z X >- f>
_j bJ ** UJ <£ ^
,Aj *•> %•? «B^ 1 *B4
> O I- £O
Ul 3 3O
— i CD c a
o o
0- •"
o ru
0 KI
sr ru
o O*
& f~
0 ru
0 KI
9 ru


o o-
• •
o* t^
o ru
0 KI
9 «C


o a-
o- r-
o ru
0 KI
» «
=r ru



c o o o- e c KI
o- co — r- — o- oo
o KI r»ru cc cr-
O CO —KI
^ » ^ *
=r ru — ru
— — —



O O Of- O O KI
* r- Cf in KI ru o-
KI -c •a in —
Kl ST CO 0
« » ^
ru — ru



r^ in ru <« o o ao
in o- «o ru o t> o
ru in •*> -C o- o-
m — KI *
» » ^ «
in KI ruKi
-
o o o o o o
ru cc =T r- rur-
O- KI mK> r-
f*. * •• K
co ru -^ r*





.^^
o
o
o t—
*> *- U. UJ
o <: o o_ o u.
• UJ CE O w ^
u. x «o 3 o
o •- 3 r «•» —
3 O < ^- CO
ru < x cr z
o «- to o
>- z x >- >-i
_J bj *•* UJ ^ **~
UJ C3 «* v» J i-l
> O •- m
bJ 3 3 C
_i a: CQ.
o r-
0- 0
* o
in r-
in KI
o r-
o- o
•0 0
in r-
m KI


o r-
• •
C> 0
« o
m r~
m KI


O I--
o- o
•c o
m r^
^ «
in KI



o n «nr- o o KI
o cr 9- o o o «r
^ in o o o — o
m ** 9 v*> *•
^ * ^ ^
IT KI fUKl
— «•• —



o in inco o o c.
o — cc rvo- — «
•c ru Kit~
in KI ruKi
« * »
v^ «• *•



r- m ni « o o co
in o- «ni o o- »
ru in -f> -i> o» o-
in — KI «

m Kt«\iK>
-
000000
ru co tr f- ru r-
o- K> in Kir-
r» •£ — r-
n ru « f-





r*
o
o
o •-
W l-b. bj
e < e a Ob,
• UJ a: o ^/^.
u. x co 3 e
O •- 3 I •» —
3 O < »» to
Kl< X CC Z
0 r-COO
1- Z X >•!-•
_J bJ — bJ < »-
Uj (3 ^* ^^ i fc^
> o »- «o
Ul 3 3 O
_l Cb O O.
 I
o-
c

-------
        CJ
        z
        UJ
        o
        u
        UJ
        t-
        o
        cc
        Q.
        °i
        ED
           UJ
           S
           X
           to
           O
           O
J2;
           o
           C/5
           o
           UJ
           Q
'CC
o
LL
               O  uj
               Z  CC
DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE
                        UJ
                        UJ

                       UJ
                     91

                     O) -i


                     > tt
                     U. Q.
MEASURE
B ACCOMPLISHMENT TITLE
                                                            s
                                                            §
                             o
                             m
                             CM
                                                                       f
                            g

                            «N
                                                O
                                                                                        CDCN


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  OE      MEDIA: Air

  Mobile  Source  Enforcement  (A310)                  REG.         APPRO: Enforce.
  B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The  mobile source  enforcement program is directed primarily towards
  achieving compliance with motor vehicle emission standards and fuels
  regulations.
       The  major  goals and objectives are to (1)  assure that new vehicles meet
  emission  standards;  (2)  assure that vehicles  meet emission standards in-use;
  (3)  assure that emission control systems are  not removed or rendered inopera-
  tive (tampering occurring on 18 to 28% of in-use cars);  (4) assure compliance
  with vehicle  miles traveled (VMT)  measures;  (5)  assure control of hydrocarbon
  emissions during gasoline transfer operations;  (6)  assure that harmful
  additives are removed from gasoline;  (7)  administer California waivers; and
  (8)  administer  the emission warranties.

  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       In FY 78,  the mobile source enforcement  program continued to carry out
  its  responsibilities  under Title I and Title  II  of  the Clean Air Act by
  emphasizing programs  aimed at reducing the failure  of vehicles to meet
  emission  standards.   In  FY 78,  the mobile source enforcement program issued
  33 Selective  Enforcement Audit test orders to manufacturers to test vehicles
  on che assembly line.  Fifty-one recall investigations were conducted as
  were audits of  ongoing recalls resulting in the  recall of 1,970,000*vehicles.
  Manufacturers'  certification and production compliance procedures were
  enforced  by conducting 25 inspections and 5 investigations.   The tampering
  provisions were enforced by conducting 90 investigations.   The unleaded gas
  regulations were enforced by contracting for  21,000 inspections.


  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       In FY 79,  efforts in the program will be focused on reducing the failure
  of vehicles to  meet  emission standards.   The  program will continue to
  emphasize the Selective  Enforcement Audit assembly  line  testing program and
  recall with increased testing and  investigative  activity as a result of
  expanded  surveillance activity.
       The  major  activities will be  to  expand the  assembly line testing
  activity  for  light duty  motor vehicles  and to establish assembly line testing
  for  heavy duty  engines;  implement warranty regulations,  develop
  maintenance instruction  regulations,  and  implement  the aftermarket parts
  certification program; administer  the emission waivers;  expand the
  antitampering program, and reduce  the improper use  of leaded gasoline
  (leaded gasoline is used  in 10%  of  cars  requiring unleaded  fuel).
       The  enforcement  activities  will  be  to issue  35  Selective Enforcement
  Audit  vehicle test orders;  conduct  27 recall  investigations;  conduct 20
  warranty  investigations;  initiate  a new antitampering strategy directed at
  supporting the  adoption  of I/M programs  in major  urban areas;  review enforce-
  ability of State Implementation  Plans and Transportation Control  Plans;
  conduct 50 imports investigations;  prevent the introduction of leaded gas
  into vehicles designed for unleaded by  conducting inspections of  fleet
  facilities and  retailers;  and enforce Stage I vapor  recovery provisions.
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Mobile  Source  Enforcement  (A310)
                   HQ   OE
                   REG.
MEDIA:

APPRO:   Enforce.
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY79C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
1 0
	 OF 	 B-

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
98
6

4183.0
117
n
114.6
5481.7
88
18
12S.2
3935.3
88
18
128.2
3935.3
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
      Continue  the assembly line  test program  (SEA)  to deter  the production  of
  nonconforming  vehicles. Implement SEA for heavy  duty engines.  Continue  the
  recall  program to improve  the  emissions  of  in use vehicles by  encouraging
  the manufacturer to  ensure the durability of  emission control  systems  for
  the useful  life of the vehicle.   Operate one  contractor  test facility  and
  METFac  in support of recall.   Establish  minimal  enforcement  program  in
  warranty area, and associated  public awareness campaign.  Perform mandated
  emission waiver activities.

      Respond to tampering  inquiries from the  public, Congress, and parties
  covered by  the prohibition; and  respond  to  telephone inquiries concerning
  the Federal tampering prohibition from the  public and regional offices.
  Monitor compliance by refineries with key lead phasedown construction  dates
  and take selective enforcement actions.  Administer fuel/fuel  additive
  waiver  requests.                                                  ,

      Implement anti-fuel switching enforcement efforts by means of test
  vehicle inspections  targeted in  potential I/M areas.  Conduct  inspections of
  municipal and  commercial fleets  to deter fuel switching and  tampering  in
  these areas.

      Funding at this level will  establish minimal enforcement  deterrence to
  fuel switching at service  stations and fleet  facilities in targeted  I/M  areas
  It will also establish minimal enforcement  deterrence "to tampering by  fleet
  facilities  in  these  areas.  This  funding, level will not deter  tampering  by
  new car dealerships  and commercial automobile repair facilities.

      Funding at this level-will  provide  minimal  encouragement  for manufac-
  turers  to design and produce cars that conform to the standards and  to
  commit  resources to  the installation of  durable  emission control  systems.
  This funding level will not encourage efforts to reduce the number of
  misbuilt vehicles, and will permit the importation of noncomplying vehicles
  by commercial  importers, and will enable selective compliance monitoring and
  enforcement of the lead phasedown requirements.  Minimal deterrent effect
  could be achieved.   This level will preclude  Stage I vapor recovery  enforce-
  ment efforts,  review of 1979 SIP  submissions  for enforceability,  and legal,
  technical,  and policy review to  assure consistent national enforcement of
  SIP's.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

  Mobile Source Enforcement  (A310)
                   HQ OE       MEDIA: Air
                   REG.         APPRO: Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
1 OF 8
continued
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE-
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)










•





  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

      Failure to  fund this level will preclude Federal  enforcement to deter
  fuel switching and tampering.   Substantial fuel switching (currently
  occurring at a 10% rate)  and tampering will continue,  resulting in
  significant adverse air quality impacts due to auto emissions.   EPA efforts
  to  obtain the  implementation of I/M in major urban areas will be hampered,
  and it  is likely that  I/M will not  be included in SIP  submissions by a
  number  of states which otherwise would have implemented the program.

      No funding  at this level will  result in subs'tantial nonconformance of
  new and in use vehicles with Federal emission standards due to  the
  manufacturers' failure to translate the certified design into production
  vehicles, defective emission control components,  and the insufficient
  durability of  the emission control  system to maintain  standards for the
  vehicle's useful life.   This noncompliance will result in significant
  increase in vehicle related air pollution.   No funding will provide little
  support for AMPC program, which will have to be completely voluntary.
  Testing support  will be limited to  support of warranty enforcement and
  production warranty regulations with no public awareness campaign.   If not
  funded,  most key dates will not be  reviewed, no on-site inspections will
  occur,  and this  level  will preclude enforcement of the lead phasedown
  requirements.  In addition,  fuel and fuel additive waiver requests would be
  granted by operation of the Act without EPA review if  this level is not
  funded.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

  Mobile Source Enforcement (A310)
                   HQ OE       MEDIA:  Air

                   REG.         APPRO:  Enforce,
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
2 8
	 OF 	

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
08
6

4183.0
117
11
1 1 L f,
5481.7
17
2
11.3
1122.2
105
20
139.5
5057.5
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

       Increase SEA for heavy duty engines to test  most suspect nonconforming
  configurations.   Limited testing at second laboratory for recall purposes
  will permit investigation of some consumer complaints.  Increase in public
  awareness campaign for warranties and additional  testing support to identify
  defects which should be covered by warranty.

       Recall investigations focused on most obvious, grossly polluting classes
  only.  No recall testing to determine compliance  with evaporative standards,
  therefore, no incentive for production of durable evaporative systems.  No
  deterrence to* production of nonconforming motorcycles since no SEA or in use
  enforcement.   No enforcement of imports regulations or plant inspections
  for misbuilt  vehicles.

       Failure  to  approve this level will permit the manufacturers to take
  more shortcuts in the design of emission control  systems resulting in
  increased noncompliance.                                          »
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

  Mobile Source Enforcement (A310)
                   HO  OE      MEDIA:  Air
                   REG.        APPRO: Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
3 8

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
98
6

4:83.0
117
11
1 14 fi
5481.7
12
1
.7.4
561.9
117
21
146.9
5619.4
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

       The SEA for cars and light duty trucks  is substantially implemented.   A
  deterrence is  established to discourage heavy duty engine manufacturers from
  producing noncomplying new engines  and a token SEA program is implemented
  for motorcycles.  Recall program confirmatory testing rate is sufficient to
  permit  the investigation of the most obvious nonconforming vehicle  classes
  suspected of noncompliance with the emission standards.   Evaporative testing
  of in use vehicles is initiated.  Initiate recall surveillance program,
  Plant inspections for misbuilt vehicles is initiated.  Program to control
  the importation of noncomplying cars is established.   New data base
  implemented, including new strategy.   Conduct quality control for enforcement
  testing with correlation check vehicle and METFac.   METFac supports I/M
  cities.  Permits greater efforts in warranty enforcement with emphasis on
  case referrals.  Testing support will be used for warranty enforcement
  actions.  Audits of AMPC program will be initiated to assure integrity of
  program.  Initiate testing in support of new strategy.   Improved quality
  control of enforcement testing facilities will reduce potential for legal
  challenge of EPA data.

       Funding at a lower level will  reduce the deterrence applicable to
  engine  manufacturers to produce new engines  which comply with the standards,
  decrease the number of ordered recalls and investigations which are
  pursued, and provide no detection or investigation of misbuilt vehicles and
  violations for certification.   Does not permit enforcement against  the
  importation of noncomplying vehicles  by commercial importers.   Support for
  AMPC program will be minimal.   Public awareness campaign will be enhanced,
  but consumer complaints will have to be dealt with by headquarters.  Funding
  at a lower level will mean the Agency will have to rely totally on
  aftermarket part industry for data  on certification of aftermarket  parts.
  Warranty enforcement activity will  be hampered by paucity of test data.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

 Mobile Source Enforcement (A310)
                   HQ  OE      MEDIA: Air
                   REG.        APPRO: Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
	 OF— B-
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
98
6

4183.0
117
11
114.6
5481.7
16
2
16.2
507.1
133
23
163.1
6126.5
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
      A new antitampering and fuel switching enforcement effort will focus
 primarily on areas of the country with such significant mobile source
 pollution problems that I/M programs will be necessary to meet air quality
 standards.  The program includes support of the Denver air initiative as
 well as selected other problem areas needing I/M.

      Conduct tampering inspections of new car dealerships and test vehicle
 inspections of new car dealerships and commercial automobile repair
 facilities in potential I/M areas.

      Funding this level will establish the enforcement of the new mobile
 source strategy by providing a deterrence to tampering by new car dealerships
 and commercial auto repair facilities in areas most likely to require I/M.

      Failure to fund this level will preclude enforcement of the Federal
 antitampering prohibitions against new car dealerships and commercial repair
 facilities, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts due to
 auto emissions.  EPA efforts to obtain implementation of I/M in major urban
 areas will be hampered and it is likely that I/M will not be included in
 SIP's by a number of states which otherwise would have implemented the
 program.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Mobile Source Enforcement  (A310)
                   HQ  OE     MEDIA:  Air
                   REG.        APPRO:  Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
5 OF 8

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE-
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
98
6

4183.0
117
11
114.6
5481.7
0
0

2000.
133
23
163.1
8126.5
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

       Conduct fuels inspections  (unleaded,  Stage I vapor recovery, and octane
 disclosure) at service stations and  fleet  facilities  in potential I/M areas.
 Fund  model anti-fuel  switching and antitampering enforcement efforts by
 several states or cities.

       Funding at  this  level will provide the contract  funds necessary to
 substantially increase enforcement deterrence  to fuel switching and
 establish programs to assure  compliance with Stage I  vapor recovery
 requirements and octane disclosure requirements in potential I/M areas.
 This  level of funding will also enable the implementation of several
 model State and  local mobile  source  enforcement programs.

       Failure to  fund  this level will preclude  Federal enforcement of Stage  I
 vapor recovery and octane disclosure requirements resulting in substantial
 noncompliance.   The growing demand for unleaded gasoline and the program  to
 phase down lead  in gasoline are exerting pressures on the refining industry
 to  limit or reduce octane, while  Federal fuel  economy requirements are
 exerting pressure on  the automobile  industry to increase car octane
 requirements.  These  opposing pressures have the potential to  crease
 substantial consumer  dissatisfaction if traditional  gasoline purchasing
 habits  result  in poor vehicle driveability because of mismatch between
 vehicle octane needs  and gasoline octane quality.  Such dissatisfaction is
 likely  to result in increased tampering and use of leaded fuel in unleaded
 cars, with  substantial increases  in  emissions. The  current 10% rate of fuel
 switching may be in part due  to octane related dissatisfaction.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

  Mobile  Source Enforcement  (A310)
                   HQ   OE     MEDIA:  Air

                   REG.        APPRO:  Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
6 a

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
98
6

4183.0
117
11
114.6
5481.7
5
0
11.8
179.8
138
23
17.4.9
8306.3
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       Conduct tampering  test vehicle inspections  in additional I/M areas,  and
  initiate  antitampering  and anti-fuel switching public education efforts in
  potential I/M  areas.

       Funding at  this level will provide  a comprehensive approach to full
  implementation of  the new mobile  source  strategy with tampering deterrence in
  additional I/M areas and enable the initiation of efforts to correct public
  misconceptions regarding the affect of auto emission controls on fuel economy
  the relationship of octane to  fuel economy, etc.

       Not  funding this level will  preclude Federal enforcement of the
  antitampering  prohibition  in certain I/M areas and result in continued
  public  misperceptions regarding Federal  automobile emission control efforts.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------





















z
Ul

<
>.
z cc
3 <
I- T
U 3
Ul CO
O Ul
tr u
ft. ce
I—I O
« 05
»- Ul
Z CC
UJ
r t-
2 ~-
O Z
ac 3
> z
z o
Iti l-i
CO
CO «•»
u> o
t- Ul
« o
CO ••
c
U* Z
«— a
z u.






*-
•z
•x.
UJ
Li
C
2
u-'
r-
Z UJ
Ul U
r ce
UJ CO
u
. a uJ
L 0 J
1 U. •-
r z CD
Ul O
r
<
< cr
ru HI
ru 
— r
z

c.

V*
CD
er
••»






>
•-4
o *—
cc «
0- _»

~"r
3
u



Z
UJ
o r
CO Ul
cr cc
— < CJ
z



CO
cr ui
PM.
0- CC
•- ac
S
tt ^f
r~ 3
cr t-
— u























KI 0
• »
in o
KI cr
o- cr
KI ru
Kl CO
in o
KI cr
o- tr
« ~

KI CO
• •
in o
KI cr
O- 0-
* «
Kt ru

KI CC
• •
in o
Kl CT
c* tr
^ ^
KI nj




KI cr 9 co e e ru
tn o 9 e cc co  
~* o- ru * r* »• 9
CO C fh. .6 -^ — *^
a a, * — «• —
* • • •
in ru ru 9
e> o o -• s> o
Kt 9 cr cr fiC ^o
— ruo- —
9 f\l — • KI




^
o
o
o »-
t& r— u. Ul
co >^ j *•* u_ Q. *-
o « o c. o u.
• ui tr o ~ ^
u. I «o 3 c
o >- 3 r ^ —
3 O * v CO
— - >-
_! Ul — UJ < •-
UJ IS >— *-• _l •—
>• O »- CO
_l CC O O.

in »^

Vx- KI
in 9
c cc
m KI
m r-
^ K?
in 9
0 «
in Kt

in r-
• •
t^- KI
in a
C CO
« ^
in KI

in r-
«k •
r*- KI
tn 9
o oc
^ ^
in KI




in e tn r» » o in
r» a KI KI in o cr
in 9 «- 9 o ru KI
o •£ a o — »••
% « % »
in ru niKi





ru -• »> ir o o KI
ru KI cr ru r* ru —
ru in ^ in •* *•
*• KI r^ 8C
•
•-




r«> v« 41 v« o o  cr ru« r- — a
co o r- « — — —•
a co * — — —
* • ^ *
in ru ru a
O O 0 — 0 O
to r» o r~ cr
-« ru o» —
9 ru *->KI




^,
c
c
o »-
M •- U. UJ
CD *-* J *^ U, d. *•
C < C Q. O U.
•Ul CC O +* **
U, I CO 3 0
O ^ 3 X w* ••
3 0 -c ~CO
ru «t x tr z
O >- CO O
i- r >c >- «
_J UJ •- Ul * *-
ui u »<-> _i 1-1
> c »- to
UJ 3 3 O
_i CC O CL

9 t».
v •
0- 0

« ru
in 9
9 r-*
cr o
w !••»
•« ru
in 9

9 f-
• •
cr o
•* ^-
•£ ru
^ ^
in a

a r»
• •
& o
•*« f^-
4) t\l
•A CJk
in a




a *^ KI fr^ o o cr
tr cr © o ^* ^^ 
— o •—*-. — ru a
« cc co ru — —
• ^ * ^
mru ru 9





cr —co o o o 9
.. 4n >o r~ ru ~ ?-
* « o- ru —
. m •• KI 9






f*. ~* -A ~« O O ^
— cr ru -c r- •- 9
1C C f- « — — -<
9 CC « — — —
* • ^ ^
tn ru ru 9
o o o — o o
KI 9 cr cr co -c
co r«- o r- cr
— ruo- —
9 ru -« KI




^
e
ct
O l~
If *- U- Ul
co ^^ _ i --• u. a. *—
o < o CL o u.
• UJ CC O ^* *-*
U. X CO 3 0
o •- 3 r •• —
3 O « ^" CO
KI «r x ce z
O t— CO C
•- z x >- >-i
_l UJ — UJ < t-
m fl *-»%-* t M
> o »- co
UJ 3 3 O
-J cc co.

in —
• *
o *
ru in
-* *
 ->
• •
^ ^
ru in
*•• *D
* *
-0 9

in ••
* •
X ^
fV IT
*-• *tt
t» ^
X 9




in ruKi «• o o

*• KI CC -C -" -H
• • ^ *
J> KIM 9





^ — 9 0 0 N
r- r- «i o ru *
t» O CO — "
BMA Kl






r^ »^ «o tH O O >C
wi tr rg vC f^ ^! sr
eo O '-^ *£t r*. iH ^H
«tf~ CO !Cr *H ^H r^
* M^ * "

O O O i-* O O
Kt *& 9^ CO CO ^
CO 1"^ O f*» O^
*-4 «S ON ^
<• rg ^H ro




^.
o
c
O t-
•? t- U. UJ
CD *^ _ J ^% U. CL *•
o < oo. o u.
• UJ Cc 0 « «-•
U. X (0 3 0
o •- 3 r •» —
3 O < ^ CO
9 •< X CC Z
=> t- co o
>- z x >-«
_J UJ ""UI « >-
Ul V> ^-* ^^ _» »-*
> o f- co
Ul 3 3 O
-J CC O Q.

«n —
• •
-c -c
ru r-
"• «"
CO «
in —
•e ~D
ru f*h
•" ••
cc -c

in -•
• •
^ ^
m. ^.
«^ V4
<^ «
co «

in —
• •
•c «
ru r~
*p* w«
• «
cc .c -




in ru KI — s
^O •£> O ^ Kl
ru •- •• »^ KI
— KICC — —
» ^ «t •
CO Kl 9 *





0 O O
0 O C
o o ru
o o in
« « »
ru ru —




r- -• « — o
— < o- ru -o r-
cc e r- « »
9 CC * — —
* » • •
in ru rv a
0 0 0 — O
KI a cr cr co
ct r» o f- er
— rue- —
a ru — KI




^,
0
0
0

^ CO *^ ^j ^^ j^ c « o a • UJ or o U X to 3 0 O ^ 3 X M — => O •< ^ CO tn < x or z 0 >- CO O >- Z X >- 1-1 » ijl »— ^1 ^ fc- ui is « >- _i «-• > 0 »- CO Ul 3 3 O _icc co. CO 1 1 o- 0 C2 ;3


-------
    «J
    z
    2 IT
    o <
    >-« I
    •- r
    t_> 3
    u; co
    *-
    O UJ
    tr u
    o. a
       3
    « co
    *- u>
    z a:
    Ul
    o z
    CL 3
    »••
    > Z
    z o
    UJ *-
       «n
    09 ~
    UJ O
    >- UJ
    « c
          LJ U
          £ IE
          uj     Q-r
\1(.    -3*
                    ru u
                    •> z
                    — z
€C «
O- _J

   X
                    » a
                    — a.
                                                •G
                                                O
                                                K)
                                                •c        ni
                                                o        —
                                                •c
                                                c
             O —
              •
             Kl I
             ru •
                                                <« -o o ru a> « a
                                                O &• —• -* f» Al ^
                                                f^ a c  »o ••    —
                            a> co     •*> o    co

                            o- tf     -c in    —
                                o «
                                 •   •
                                — sr
                            •* —• •*> o  eon

                            r- o- nj K>  — o «
                            »• o f» in  nt -* >*>
                            IT  o. >-
   o
   o              >-
   n           >- u. ui
O) ^>    _l ~: U. O. *-
O       < O Q. O U.
     • UJ a: o    ^ *•
u. x - Z X >- »«
_l Ul •"• Ul « c—
UJ -J •-• •— _I «-
> O        »- «I5
             3 O
             O O.

-------
CJ
z
UJ
z
O
H
CJ
LU
H-
o
CC
a.
z
UJ
    O
    u
    o
    c/2
    u
    LU
    Q
   'CC
    o




.
CU
o
M
O
(H UH
•H C

UJ


•
o
CC
0.
LU

^
_
«£
^
yj
LU




LJ
C
D
0
£
LJ

5
j
j




9

J
K

1
J
»
5
j
j
t

3

inr^srHCM r- -a-CMOcsiooenoin ocomcMmo oo vo en
en CM rH oo O O in ^ in CM CM rH o en
>£> O rH CM CM
0
rH
en


in r*^ rH CM r^> *^ CM o CM o O en o in o oo m CM in o O O \o en
en CM rH oo O O in rH in CM CN rH o en
v£> O rH CM CM
o
rH
en


mr^i-HCM r- •3-CMOcMOOenOm OoomcMino OO vo en
v£> O rH CM CM
O

.
en
inr*NrHCM r^> vycMOcMoocnoin OoomcMino oo ^o en
VO O rH CM CM
0
r"H
en

mmorH -, 00 E r<
COCO iH 01 4J 4-1 -H 0) CU
CO 4^C ^ 4"Jr u-l 3
COTJ4J 14-1 jjy CO-H(H4JCBtrJCC
MCQMCd CO CQiH'Oal CAJ CCCUSCU-HCU CD
cuuou oo 4-i -a 4-1 o cu D. -r*u a,^ M -H
T3CU O CM CO CUCO UCO CB r-j Ut-lCUXX C
U"a4J> -HC CU rHCU2tOC T3 OT3COCU34J4J (-1
OV4COCU C04-^O 4-* rH 4-1 ""•••• rH »H CQCCUOCUEECOCC O
OCUH CrH-H ed MCU CcB> VJU3CCOC8 «H
4J 4J~^ O34J >, OCU 1-ICU O -HOCUCUCOCCilHrl iH
C04J CO -H CD M (_i 0) O CO U -H CO 4J U > 0-1 C MU rH
01 W CU C 4J 0) OO O r-H-H(-lUCU UECOCO Cr( rH O -H
•H-tHOO.rHCUCCtCrlU-lO-UUO4Jll)4J-HCUS-i)-iWa.)-lW-HI-l)-l
n dO 4-* CO rH J> CJ *H CO C O n J-icncOCJJ-t^WE "4^ CUCUCUSCUCU4JCUed
••CUCO3CCICCU CUOCUCU3Ci4 o p* p *ri ni o o r> r> n n fi o qi
^ ^ Lt3 S CO O hH Oi5 33 CJ Di ^ CO E-* ^ rH p, h- ICXi^OiEEECJESfCiE e^
6d CU WCU-^E 333333
CO 3£ SZMM ZZZZZZ
•' *i L '






































































s

CO

CN
t
0


E
o
u.

a.


-------
>
U
<

z
g

H
U
LU

O
cc
a.
Of


5  &o
Z
LU
    Z
    LU
    O
    u
    u
   Z
   g

   CO

   o
   LU

   Q
   'a:
   O



>.
^







at
J
.J
UJ
>
UJ

H

LU
LU

J
"^1
-J
LU
^
LU
_l
LU

LU
_J

J
UJ
^
LU

4
UJ
^
UJ
-1

0> -j
O
^ cc
u. a.
UJ
U. UJ


LU
cc

v>

LU

o3
LU
-J
h™
r^

z
UJ
2
I

•—
J
ex
O
U
O

CO

vD \O sTO OOO OOOO
CMO OOOO OOOO
vr OCMOO oooo
*™i in r™t in o c^ in
i— i i— i


\O \D *3"O OOO OOOO
CMO OO-* OOOO
-»"OOvO OOOO
*H m »— i m o o\ in
r— i iwj


vO xO ^f O O O O O O O O
CM o o o  \o - 01 00 3 O E Q)
•H > t-l <4H iH CO a
Cd -H JJ s-' 4J AJ 0)
> « en o ^ a
3 oi en oi to -H x
X > C Q. C M OJ
O O c ocnotnoic
SU-H -H C-HC > 0
4J -H 4J O O -H
x x oo u 01-1010014-1
t-i i-i c cu a. a) 4j e a) i-i o
O O -H OOD. -HCUCO-HMSO
4J 4J Lj SCO J3 B3 4J i-l COD.
3 3 ai oc cQCnoi-iODa
4-1 4J &, -HlH I-1T-I COO'-HC
co  oi i— t oo co rH -H >-HW
en en o. o e cu o > -o TJCU
"o ^"o c'to^c,c!n'a!c tu-aM airH
iH «H O "H CUOWCUCncOCUC *4H
h h u w u i-i >44to> euooco
aicooicoo)U4j -H u tn rH co -u en
'ii'S^'iS'cutn w S'U'H-D'UO'~|
333rHOIO)OI3 3
SZZP&HZHfa fc

















































^_
rS
•
CO
(N

1
~
CN
EJ
|

<
a.
LU

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ          MEDIA:  Air

  Mobile Source Enforcement (A310)                  REG.  X     APPRO:  Enforce.
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

       The long-range goal of  the mobile source enforcement regional program
  is  to establish strong State,  local,  and EPA regional in-use enforcement
  programs to complement headquarters'  national enforcement efforts.  The
  primary thrust of these in-use enforcement efforts is to support the
  implementation of I/M programs in major urban areas.   This is a new
  enforcement strategy.   Regional personnel, with their State contacts and
  experience in dealing with States,  are the key element in developing State
  and local mobile source related legislation and enforcement efforts.   In
  addition, because of  their local availability, regional personnel will have
  primary responsibility for responding to consumer complaints regarding
  potential tampering and warranty violations.   Maximum use of private and
  State contracts will  be emphasized for inspection activities.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       In FY 78,  the mobile source enforcement  regional program conducted
  2,000 service station inspections to 'assure compliance with the Stage I
  vapor recovery provision, conducted 21,000 unleaded gasoline inspections;
  issued 560 complaints; collected $250,000 in penalties as a result of
  regional enforcement  activity; and conducted  a survey of 6,000 refuelings
  indicating a 10% fuel switching rate.                              •
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       The FY 79 program provides a transition from FY 78 activities to the
  major enforcement thrust in FY 80 to support the adoption of I/M programs
  in urban areas.  Service station fuels inspection activities will be
  redirected to municipal and commercial fleet inspections for tampering and
  fuel switching.  Public education efforts will be implemented regarding
  fuel switching and tampering,  and regional follow-up of vehicle owner
  complaints of alleged instances of tampering will be emphasized.   These
  efforts will complement and be coordinated with headquarters' national
  efforts to achieve focused investigatory and enforcement objectives in
  order to maximize the deterrent effect of the limited resources for mobile
  source enforcement purposes.   Maximum use of private and State contracts
  will be emphasized for inspection activities.
                                                                      J2f
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Mobile  Source Enforcement  (A310)
                   HQ

                   REG.  X
MEDIA: Air
APPRO: Enforce.
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY80CUM
LEVEL
1 1

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
23
6

517.0
21
10
36.3
597.3
29
n
?Q n
800.0
29
n
29. n
800.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       Conduct tampering  and warranty investigations  in potential I/M  areas  in
  response to public  complaints  regarding  alleged violations.  Perform extended
  observations of  vehicle refueling operations  to deter the  introduction  of
  leaded  gasoline  into vehicles  designed for unleaded.  Initiate efforts  in
  potential I/M  areas to  encourage  enactment and enforcement of  State  and
  local laws to  reduce fuel  switching and  tampering and to educate  the public
  regarding motor  vehicle emission  controls.

       Funding at  this level will establish  a minimal response to complaints
  from the public  regarding  warranty and tampering, thereby  providing  minimal
  level of deterrence. It will  also enable  initiation of public education
  efforts and liaison with State environmental  and enforcement agencies for
  the purpose of encouraging State  and  local adoption and enforcement  of  laws
  to  reduce fuel switching and  tampering.
                                                                   *
       Failure to  fund this  level will  preclude liaison with State  and local
  agencies, public education efforts and response  to  consumer complaints  of
  alleged tampering and warranty violations.
          02^3
EPA Form 2410-11 (8.78)

-------
z  a.
o  <
•-Z
c-  I
0  =>
O UJ
tt U
Q. a

-i o
f V>
*- UJ
Z CT
UJ
r •-
2 «
O Z
> z
Z O
LJ •—
   *>

                                     o
                      c

                      «
                      o
                                                                                                                                                         c-
                     O f\l
            o c
            o e
                     ac O-
                     O IV
o-
ru
            o o    o- o o

            r- r-    rufi -D
            — —    »• ru
            ir>i/»    W
         = >-    _j ^-u. a •-
         o       ^ o a. o u.
             • UJ a: o    *-> \*
         u. I «o n o
         o •- s r •» —
            =>o < *" m
         — « I o:    z
         O       »- €0 O
            ^- Z X >- N*
         _J UJ — UJ < •-
         UJ t» ^ <^ _) •»
         > o       *- to
         •jj 3       =J C
         _i o       o a
                                                                                                                             02

-------
UJ
z
o

K
O
LU
(-
O
C
a.
2 >
UJ C

H
ii
LU
  Z
  LU

  S
  Z
  CO
  O

  O
  D

  Z
  O
  o
  UJ
  C


.
0)
u
o
•H e
< a
.. &!
< O
5 r
u a.
5 <





X!

C
O LU













o"
S^n-

^7 ^
T™ g
O g
u 5
Q £
< °
~ n

«J
K 0)

^ 3
§OT
DECISION
Mobile

<







V)
Z
LU

ft*
^j
0.
5
O
CJ
U
UJ
_l
D

0
I
LU





-i
LU
LU



_
UJ
LU
~"



J
LU
^
LU
-1
LU
>
LU
J
LU
LU
1
_]

^
LU
0>
en
"~ O
> K.
U. £_
FY 1978
ESTIMATE
LU

«
*
TJ
UJ
 M
4J LJ C8 /-N
CD 0) 0) CO
0) CO >% M
> XI 1 TO
C O ^ CU
•H L4 X
00 O 1
>. C 3 *
C fi O
CO CJ CD 3
1-1 U 01 ^
LJ -H 4J
CO 3 cfl S
3 ca i-i o
w -H
•W i-H 4-1
C CU £ CO
CO 3 4-> U
«-i -H 3
00 3-0
C -o cu
•H 0) C
w -o o y
CU C CO -H
a. cu t-i i-i
E •" CB ^
CO X -H 3
H W J CL,


J
1
^
























(

















CO
cc
PN
0
tN
I
<
Q.
LU

-------
                           IRCN.VS.NTA;. PROTECTION AGENCY

    M 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
   "} C£c:sic.N UNIT TITLE :ANO CODE;                      HC  ORD      MEOuRadiation

jHealth & Ecological Effects-Radiation  (n05)	3£S.	Apogc^ & D
B)  LONG RANGE GOALS  & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

Preliminary U.S. data and reported information from Eastern Europe and the
Soviet Union  indicate that chronic, low-level exposure to microwaves could
produce behavioral, teratologic, and affect immune defense mofh'niimg.  The
program's purpose  is  thus to delineate further q^d evaluate health effects in-
formation which will  be needed to establish guidelines for environmental levels
of non-ionizing radiation to which the public is exposed.  The research requires	
a highly technical, interdisciplinary team to determine potential biological
effects from  exposure to environmentally occurring electromagnetic radiation
(EMR) frequencies  and power densities and to identify mechanisms of inter-
jection of EMR with biological systems, including frequency dependence and
jpower densities of those interactions.  Driving forces:  (1) responsibility
jfor conducting health effects research for frequencies of environmental
•consequence as part of multiagency activities; (2) need to provide health data
Jin support of the  Office of Radiation Programs which will determine the need
jfor guidelines for non-ionizing radiation by 1980; (3) necessity for determining
if the-U.S. occupational standard (10 milliwatts/square centimeter (10mW/cm))
jis too high for use as a departure point for deriving environmental guidance
and standards by resolving the discrepancy between the U.S. and other standards
Such as the USSR's which is 1000-fold lower.                                   '

    FT 78 ACCOMPLISBMENTS

kultidisciplinary  long-term, low-level exposure studies at frequencies of
environmental concern:

 .o  long-term exposure to FM radio frequency-teratologic, immunologic,
     behavioral and reproductive evaluations in rats
  o  in vitro and  postnatal exposure to monkeys to microwaves-teratologic,
     growth and behavior studies
  o  iamunologic,  genetic, reproductive aspects of long-term exposure to
     UHF-TV band frequency

Cmmunologic and central nervous system studies:

  o  immunologic studies of mice exposed to radar frequency (report)
  o  replication and validation of interactive effects of AM radiation on
     brain tissue

D)   FT 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

     Determine the most sensitive biological indicators  of  low-level microwave
     effects (teratologic,  cytogenic,  behavioral  and neurophysiological
     effects;  isnaunologic  studies,  genetic  studies).
     Determine the specific  microwave  frequencies which may constitute
     hazardous environmental pollutants.
     Studies to  resolve 1000-fold discrepancy  in  microwave  exposure standards
     between Russia and  the  U.S.  (emphasis  on  iamunologic,  behavioral,        ,o,  .
     reproductive endpoints) .                                                JZL
  o  Refinement  of  microwave  dosimetry techniques.

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY


FORM!:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW  (CONTINUATION)
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  °^     MEDIARadiation

 Health & Eeoloeieal Effects-Radiation (71.05)       REG-        APPRO:  R & D
   o  Studies to resolve 1000-fold discrepancy In microwave exposure standards
      between Russia and the U.S.  (emphasis  on laanunologic, behavioral
      reproductive endpoints).
   o  Refinement of microwave doslmetry techniques.
        JZt"
    ram 24'.0-10 (8-73';

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 ORH  2S DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HQ       M£DIA|  RAD
F105  HEALTH & ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS-RAD             APPRO|  RID

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY  80  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          30.0          26.0          20.0          20.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           3.0           3.0           2.0           2.0
01  OF 07             FTE                        32.3          25.9          25.9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)        700.0         930.0         698.0         696,0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Activities
       Immunologic and cytogenetic effects:  Chronic exposure throughout
       gestation and postnatally) of rats to 2450 MHz (microwave oven) 425 MHz
       ultrahigh frequency  (UHF), 100 MHz-(FM) and 915 MHz  (diathermy L band
       radar)  at power densities £ 5 at?/cm ; expand immune defense mechanism
       studies to examine short- versus long-term exposures  on lymphocyte
       function, pulsed versus continuous wave exposures  on  iamuno-eompetent
       cells,  and exposure  to infectious disease agents;  extend lymphocyte
       transformation studies to mice and to examine for  irreversible changes
       and chromosomal abnormalities.

       Teratogenic and mutagenic effects:  Determine mutagenic changes in rats
       chronically exposed  to various frequencies at low  levels; assess through.
       reproductive testing of male rats using the dominant  lethal assay for
       post-implantation deaths of embryos; examine teratogenic effects in
       animals with chronic intrautarine exposure to low-levels of 2450, 100,
       425, and 915 MHz EMR at power densities £5 mW/cm .

       Dosinetry:  Continue work both to provide support  for effects studies at
       given frequencies and power densities under study  and to develop
       diagnostic/analytical predictive tools.

       Initiate a pilot epidemiological study to examine  possible relationships
       of observable health effects of exposure to nonionizing EMR and to
       correlate human effects to those observed in animal models.
  Impact
    o  Funding at  this base level will allow for continued  development and
       verification of data on immunologic, cytogenetic,  and  teratogenic
       responses.  Current data are suggestive of deleterious effects from
       chronic low-level exposure.  Results will be used  to develop environmental
       guidelines  protective of the public health, especially as regards immune
       defense and teratologic/mutagenic risks.  Evidence is  accumulating, from
       Soviet and  East European and, U.S. (this program)  and  British sources,
       which points to effects on immune defense cell types from short- to long-
       term  low-level exposure to microwaves.  The observation of increased
       white blood cell counts in U.S. embassy employees  in Moscow illustrates
       the immediate concern of possible deleterious effects.  The Soviets and
       a recent U.S. report have demonstrated teratologic effects in animals.
       The implications of such responses in humans are important, and
       resolution  of this question is critical and will be  examined in depth in
       this program.                                                       J2C

 5? A ?am MIO-i : i 3-73)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS  (CONTINUATION)  _
  A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

Bealth and Ecological Effects-Radiation (7105)
                         HQ ORD      -MEDIA; Radiation

                         REG.         APPRO:  R & D
  8. RESOURCE SUMMARY
     FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL

    — OP-
               POSITIONS
 PFT
OPFT
 FTE
              BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


Impact (Continued)
     Funding at this level would allow Initiation of population studies which
     are needed to complement animal studies, present a balanced program
     of varied research approaches, and examine potential effects in ambient
     conditions.

     Not funding at this level would cause all non-ionizing radiation research
     to cease, thereby finally eliminating all radiation support in ORE.  The
     Agency would lack any research program support, especially regarding
     health effects, for any regulatory actions or regional activities.
     Fifteen percent of national, Federal research efforts on non-ionizing
     research would be eliminated.  No other agency or program is examining
     frequencies or power densities of environmental concern; those of'most
     concern to the regulatory mission of EPA.

     Failure to fund this level would result in direct jnman data to remain
     lacking in the support of the development of non-ionizing radiation
     guidelines and specific activities in various Regions.

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 ORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          HQ       MgDIAi  RAD
F105  HEALTH & ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS-RAD      '       ARPRDi  R  & D
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 07 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT
30.0
3.0

700.0
FY 79 C. E.
26.0
3.0
32.3
930.0
FY 80 INCR
3.0
1.0
2.9
139.0
FY 80 CUM
23.0
3.0
28.8
837.0
   C  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  Activities
  o  Neurophysiologic and  behavioral effects:

     a).   Examine effects  of  chronic low-level exposure of rats and primates to
          2450, 915,  425,  and 100 MHz EMR. at power densities £5 mW/cm .
          Responses of concern include learning and memory (operant behavior),
          reflex development,  spontaneous activity, social behavior and EEG
          response.  Neurochemical analyses and neuropathology will also be
          included to evaluate neurotransmitter levels and concentrations
          of critical enzymes.

     b).   Examine effects  of  navigational radar frequency on the blood-brain
          barrier in  dogs. Preliminary  indications of increased permeability
       v  to high molecular weight compounds that could impair central nervous
          system (CNS) function and CNS  bacterial infection are of concern here.

     c).  -Evaluate the physiological parameters of microwave-induced heat stress
          to resolve  whether  or not observed effects relate solely to thermal
          changes and to identify the best indicators of heat stress to use to
          delineate such factors in other studies.

  o  Initiate full-scale epidemiology study on microwave exposure effects of
     selected workers.

  Impact
     Funding at this level allows  examination of the three primary endpoints of
     most concern by reinstatement of behavioral/neurophysiologic research at the
     FY 78 level.  The basis for the Soviet  standard, which is 1000 times lower
     than the U.S., in extensive studies  of  the health status of workers and
     animals to low levels of non-ionizing EMR in. which effects such as
     irritability, decreased libido, loss of conditioned reflexes and increased
     cortical brain activity were  observed.  These effects occurred at levels
     below those required to produce other effects on other systems.  This program
     will examine this reported phenomenon by utilizing conditions of prolonged,
     low-level exposures.  Such regimens  are reported as most appropriate by the
     Soviets but have not generally been  utilized by U.S. and Western European
     researchers.


                                                                      J2" J
     F.m 2410.11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS (CONTOTtJATiaN)
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)

 Health  &  Eeoloeieal Effects-Radiation (F105)
                         HQ
                         REG.
MEDIA: Radiation

APPRO: R & D
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
     FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
      FY 80 CUM.
     LEVEL
   2       7
               POSITIONS
 PFT I
OPFT
                            FTE
              BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEV EL ONLY. DESCRIBrTHE BENEFITS
    OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

Impact (Continued)
   Not funding at this level would result in the inability to provide OR?
   with relevant data on the various biological parameters cited by the
   Soviets and others as most critical.  Information on these endpoints,
   plus the heat stress research are critical to any regulatory action on
   decision making by the Agency in that the U.S. occupational guide is
   based on changes in temperature whereas Soviet and East European
   standards, which are lower, are based on observed biologic/physiologic
   effects;

   Would jeopardize maintenance of necessary in-house support function, i.e.
   instrumentation, design and construction of exposure systems, animal
   support, neuropathology, and quality assurance;

o  Requires RIF of laboratory personnel.
          U2T1

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

ORM  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL ANALYSIS
A.
Fl
DECISION
05 HEALTH
UNIT TITLE
& ECOLOGIC
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 07 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0
AND CODE
AL EFFECTS-RAD
FY
78 ACT FY
30.0
3.0
700.0
HQ
79 C. E
26.
3.
32.
930,

0
0
3
0
MEDJA
APPRO
I
I
FY 60
RAD
RID
INCR
3,0
1.5
93.0


FY 60 CUM
26,0
3.0
30.3
930.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS L£VEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Activities
 Mechanisms of action studies
   o  Define specific absorption frequencies  of non-ionizing EMR in biological
      systems; examine effects  of microwave frequencies over a range of 250 to
      3000 MHz on molecular, subcellular and  tissue  systems to determine
      whether specific frequencies  in  this range  interact with the sample to
      produce Increased energy  absorption.
   o  Define interaction of AH  non-ionizing EMS. in biological system; In vitro
      studies with  isolated chick brain  systems to establish frequency
      dependence and reaction modifiers;  effects  on  mammalian and bacterial
      genetic systems, effects  on membranes and membrane-bound systems.

   o  Define interaction of selected radio and radar frequencies with biological
      system In vitro; electron spin resonance studies to examine effects of
      1,  2.45, and  9 GHz on cell membranes; examine  range of frequencies on
      biopolymers,  membranes, and genetic information in haploid and diploid
      cells; examine the effects of very low  frequencies  (£60 Hz) on lymphocytes
      In  vitro.
 Impact
      Funding at this  level allows  program to develop and provide the critical
      information on which frequencies at what  levels present the most environ-
      mental concern.   This work will elucidate by what mechanism of action
      effects of non-ionizing radiation  occur.  In general, the absorption' of
      RF /microwave energy is dependent upon EMS. frequency and the size,
      dialectric properties and  orientation with  respect to the electric field
      of the absorber.  The unknowns are whether  specific resonant frequencies
      exists which are not predicted by  general whole organism models and
      whether, on a lower level  of  biologic organisation, specific systems,
      organs, cell types or biomolecules may interact with frequencies not
      considered interactive on  a whole  arrfmal  basis.
      Failure to fund  this level would result in  lack of the necessary
      complement to biologic effects studies.   Emerging data indicate too
      many biological  phenomena  which do not solely correspond to the heat
      effect.  If there is no obvious heat rise with exposure, the resulting
      effects are unexplainable. The work at this level will address this
      problem, and in  addition may  enable development of a predictive capability
      of a given exposure, if the mechanism of  action becomes known.
      It should be noted that we believe this cumulative level to represent the
      critical mass of this program; this is the  amount of resources that allow
      the basic areas of  concern at  present  to be addressed at a m-fTi-innm level of
      effort .
5? A Firm 2J10-! ' ,3-

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 FORM 2j  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
FJ05 HEALTH & ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS-RAD
HO
M£UIA| RAO
APPRO! R & D
 8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E,   FY 00  1NCR    FY 80  CUM
          POSITIONS  PFT     '    30.0          26.0           «.o          30.0
  LEVEL              OPFT          3.0           3.0           5.0           8.0
 06  OF 07            FTE                       32.3          11.1          41. <4
    BUDGET AUTH.  COOO.O)       700.0         930.0      2,000.0      2,930.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONIV. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
 Activities

   o  Conduct epidemiologic study of MIT radiation laboratory workers.

   o  Conduct Phase  II of HAS/NAVY epidemiology study to rafiae exposure data
      on 20,000  radar operations and investigate  the morbidity and reproductive
      performance of these  men.

   o  Study effects  of exposure to electromagnetic radiation of microwave
      oven workers.

   o  Expand investigations of the effects  of pre- and postnatal exposure of
      squirrel monkeys to 245 MHz radiation.

   o  Conduct prospective studies of special  populations on effects of microwave
      radiation exposures,  e.g., elderly and  infants; heat sensitive
      populations; populations with chronic diseases.
 Impact
      Epidemiology information will be obtained, which does not currently exist
      to <"•""•**"» the possible relationships of observable health effects from
      exposure to microwave radiation and correlate human effects to those
      observed in •"•»*?•«* 1 models.  Information will also be obtained on effects
      to special populations.  Preliminary indications of possible effects from
      pre*- and postnatal exposure (rats) will be investigated.
        J2T
EPA Farm 2410-1!

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 ORM  2! DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          MQ       M£l>IA| RAD
F105  HEALTH  & ECOLOGICAL  EFFECTS-RAD             APPRO! R  &  D

^'RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  7
-------



















z
ui
cs

>.
z er
c «
UJ CO
o ui
QZ LJ
33
_l O
< CO
»- UJ
z a
r »-
Z 1-1
c z
tr o
> z
Z O
lit I—I
*o
 t»
UJ C
O '
c
•0 C2
UJ
U *i
a:
< X
Uf ^*
CO _l
Ul «I
a uJ
r
^t — ^<
r ^* I*"1
o
^ «••
ru u.

a
CO
»


CO
o- ~
— CO
>-
r
••4
H-
CO
Ul
ru cs
cc z
O 1-1
— z
z
«
Q.
«B^

CO
o
«M




ku
_
o >-
CO «t
o- _i

3,
u



u.
c r
CO Ul
o- o:
*** LJ
Z


1-
O> UJ
fw
o- o:
— a:


K. —
o- t-
— u

























• •
cc c
o- o



O Kl
• •
CD O
o- o




O Kl
CC 0
o- o





o o «> KI e c o
cc  o-
co * ru o o ru IT
o ru r^ o ru ru
•c -c «





O O O CO O O Kl
O CO AJ C*1 -^ Kl ru
KI in f^ o ru KI
c- cc r-


O O O 0 O C
o ru co ru o KI
O CO » O Kl
r- « «






^^
o
o
o >-
** ^ b. UJ
C < O Q. O U.
• UJ o: o ^f ^f
u. S «o 3; o
o •- D I «n —
3> O < ^^ CO
— •« X X Z
O H- CO C
H- Z X >- M
_J Ul -" U < *-
LU ti> *-* *-* —i ^"
> C H- to
u! 3 3> O
_> CC CO.
O CO O CO
r~ t> o o
KI -« KI e-
cc »~ o- r-

0 CO C CO
f- e> o o-
Kl -> Kl O
eo r- o- r-


o cc o co
• • • •
r- o- o »
Kl — Kl C>
cc »- o r-



C CC O CO
r» o- o o-
K> — Kl O-
CO f>- O- *-




C O O CO O O CO OOOCOOOKI
p^tnrucrKtKico cccruO'^Kio
KI -c r- — ru ru Kiir>^-o-ru KI
co f^ r^ cr co ^






oo inooo- oo oe m
c-o O-KI — ru KIKI OKI —
Kl Kl *• €>• O* CO
V* «M W4





ooecoooKi OOOCOOOKI
ccoruo-^Kiru ocoruc>«Kiru
Kimf-o-ru KI Kiinf~o-ru KI
o eo r- t> cc r-


oooooo o o o o o o
orucoruoKi orucoruoKt
O CC — O Kl 0 CC — = Kl
r- * « »^ « o






^^ ^«
o o
o c
o i- e *-
•* ^-u_uj w »-u.uJ
o   ««
u.xtcr>c uxo
O»-DI^— O»-3Tl«~
3>O<^«O Z)O«»-CO
iM«ra: z KI-coo c >-coo
>-ZX>-»- p-ZX>-i-i
	 >UI*-UJ<»— —1 UJ •— UJ < »—
UJ^^^^^J*^ UJC£^*^*_JI-H
>c >-co >e »-K
ui3 =o uJ— z>o
_i 
Kl —
o- in
« ^
ru ru

o cc
0 tf
Kl -«
e> in
* »
ru ru


o c o co o e a
c cc ru o- o co —
KI in f* — KI a
o KI ir> in »
* « * »
ru — — ru




oooooo**
e- c c c a in —
o o o ru —
o in in r-
^ « «
ru — -•



O 0 O CO O O Kl
o co ru O o KI ru
KI in r- o- ru KI
P- CO t-


o o e o o e
o ru co ru o KI
O CO — O Kl
r- « o






*s
O
c
o •-
V- *- U. Ui
C < C Q. O U.
• ui a: o ^- ^
u. i co rs o

S O < «" «O
•c < i o: z
o >- to o
t- Z X >• 1-
_! Ul — UJ < H-
uj cs ^ -^ j «
> C J; (0

_i ru
:i a

0 CC'
• •
:= o-
Kl Kl
IT ru
» ^
a a

o cc
o o-
Kl Kl
»• ru
« «
:3 a


o c- e cc o
o « ru o- -c
KI in r^ K> KI
o- in KI ru ^
» » . .^
a ru ru a •
^



O 0 O O 0
C C C' O .C
o o c ru
o ru co t-
* • ^
rvj — —



O O O CO O
0 CC IM C- JJ
K> in r> o ru
IP cc r-


o o o o o
s ru co ru o
e co — » KI
r- -C *






i*^
o
o
o
UK *-
O « C. O.
• Ul O. 0
u. r co 3 o
o ~ =- r w> ^
a o < ^-,1
P-« I C •
o ^ mV
«- z x >- 21
_, UJ «- UJ «S >-

> C »- 40
Ul 3 3 O
_i cr CD.
CO <
r- i

-------
 z
 UJ
 is
 z o:
 O f
 I- T
 LJ =)
 O UJ
 a o
 a. a
  i o
    03
>  z
z  o
m •-•
u u
*— UJ
«t c
o
LJ I.
>- ac
      a. _>
      o •<
      _> u
      kti <_
      » o
      ID O
      u «t
      a:
      < I
      UJ »-
      <0 _)
      UJ •<
      a ui
                 ni cs
                 
                o- •-
                                                                                                                                                                                  K>  <
                                                                                                                                                                                  r-.
                                                                                                                                                                                   i
                                                                                                                                                                                  o-
                                                                                                                                                                                   c
                            b. lu
                         r* a. *-
                         o o u.

-------














. —




O
Z
LU
O
** ^
1 £
t- e-
U 2
LU 5
r* H
o i
-i -
^
fMW
z >
^J ^^
s <
o 1
c «?
> *"
^? ^?
LU ^-
Z
LU
£
J
<1VM: DECISION UNIT ACCOMP
1 '5
u.

c
o
*J Q
a



LU
t/}
3
|
u
u
Ul
_l
3
S


u.






•:
>
u

oo co


I
\Q

U
5>
UJ
_i

J
Ul
^
Ul
H
Ul
u
J
H
_J
Ul
>
Ul
^
HJ
I
ui
>
Ul
en
en -,•
*~ o
> C
u. c.

Ul
03 ^
2 —
r-
^» ^^

|
4J
_1 Ul
DECISION UNIT TITLE 1AND CODE)
alth & Ecological Effecta-RadJ
—
ACCOMI'LISMMENT TITLE 8. MEASURI
c



!-l r-t
oo eo

O O O f-l CM
OO 00 OO CD 00





O O O r-l «
oo oo oo oo oo

r-l r-l
oo oo





lH r-l
oo oo



1-1 1-1 •
eo eo



00 . OO


O O r^ i-l CN
CO CO 00 CD 00



0 0 r^ ^ CM
CO 00 00 GO CO

	 	 -_ . 	
oo ' eo



•r-l r-l
00 00

eo oo


a
u *J
JS V
CU *W
twin-well calorimetry
measurements of absorbed dose
(monkeys, rodents)
quantify and verify thermogra
data
irophysiologic & Behavioral Ef
o o 3
z
X
il C «M
a > o o x
3 -H u
chronic exposure on spontaneo
activity and learned behavior
pulsed versus continuous wave
radiation on behavior
AM effects on spontaneous act
and learned behavior
acute versus chronic exposure
blood brain barrier
acute versus chronic exposure
pulsed EMR on short-term memo
hanisms of Action
y
O O O O O V
0)
g ~
U "ID
define specific absorption
frequencies in biological sys
(status report on blopolymers
cellular & subcellular systemi
interaction of AM frequencies
(status report)
0 0

-------
o
U
UJ
H
o

CL
2 >
"J e

H

ii
  LU
  a.

  O
  a
  2
  a


  rr

  5
  c
  O


d
o
•H Q
AJ
03 %0
•o ai
3
• £»
< o
^2 J^
UJ C—
5<





§
O
C5
C u












0
Cu
e

UJ



UJ


t

M
H
Z
UJ
M
J
UJ

u
O O f-(
00 CO OO






O O i-l
00 CO CO

1 1
H I
n
U
CJ
UJ
<
2


o
^

u.




^*
UJ
^
UJ
H
-t
>
UJ

j

UJ
IU
_J
H
— '
^
LU
e -,•
*• o
> s
u. ev
UJ
^ K
1— UJ

Q
..
A
_1 UJ
AND CODE)
Sffedta-Radj
LE & MEASUH
^
LU ^ —
^ 0
»- S p-
h- -H 2
t ? §
2! ^? •»
^ W y-
2 W J
5 - o
O JS u
Q ~*
4)


w

a






O • O i-l
CO 00 QO



rH O  a 4) j=
i-l u IM o
C >» 0) co v«
OH JJ i-l Cd g
WO 3 CO O
j= w y 41 y w
yd aw 1-1 4 4J
y -H 1-13 2: u- ca
41 -u "O "O CO 01 W
u-i 3 d SO "O
U4.UC3CD.UB. dUI
^3 CO 0) CO X Q iH
co jv o) d eo oo
uoio)i-iO) o you
•H u w y «jyi4 1-1 r-i u
oc also oii-iw QC o y
O >— I m X r-t c u O yea
r-l CUOD.O.O4I rH-HO
o SO.B SWIM o xa.
c o x s o j= c u ox
3 ycurH u u 1-1 eg u 41
§u
O O 4) O
M H


u d v
•HO a> ca
d «> O
O 91 0) CO "O
U U W X
A 33 iH d
U CO C CO  OJ O > 03 4) r-l 4J
OS O 4-1 iH ^ > u 41 O.
4J 03 T3 W i-l JJ 41 AJ U D3IOW
coo s 4-1 3 y u o AJU o
W (^ W 3 ^ C S CU W ^J W 03
«x o ui-*s yx g do.c
AJ 41 Ul 03 O. U-I !8 — *H>HVWC3
3 a
O 41 O O O O
•Z Q





























-















eo
r*.
eo
*^
fN
0
§
0
LU
^
o


-------
   o
   o
   <
   o
   o E
   Z >
   UJ g
   S <
   ii
   z
EC
02- :§
1 ,

















--






^
a
c
)-
t-
^M
6-
c


»»
»•
5
>
>
c
M
»3
IW
Z
J

^
«>
M»
J
,
i
D
J
J
••
»
>
5
9
5
•»
c
M
>
J
2
T

K



C
o
•H
«
ft vO
•a
a tri
os
.. e.'
< 0
UJ ^^
s <



- —
1
a
w UJ











1^
Cm
B
O
,>
O
^H
•o
"?
a '
83
a •«
z ^
^ «M
£w
J*-*
— ' o
t S
*••&
t 0
§«
^ PI
DECISION
alth & Ei
Of
< s





i
u
^

UJ
! —
,
.-M

V.

Z
UJ
^
e.
O
u
u
o
s
3
en
>
u.




^^1
t

u

UJ
_J


UJ
^
J
_l
w
UJ
"*
^ J

^
UJ
J(
_l
UJ
UJ
a
o -,-
- o
> C
U> B.
UJ
eo -l
M >> « ffl 3
•a u M w a
at i-t AJ a «a o
JJ > 0) C BM
u eon
a> s /-» o o u -o
i-4 > 0)
IW-HCO U-> 4J O 1-H 1-1
OU>> 0) O Q. C 0)
C CB U 1) O O CO
a oi i-i is
C 3 0! C 0) JS ffl I
o a- e -H «H s
o vi-i xi ooiua o
(8 S "O U U X i-l
M M S 3 W 0 O
01 a s oi n >H -H
u «a g tg oi u s
Gate •" ai to « 01
•Hl-iO jj S v f-l "O

o o a




0
^ (D
e u
§0)
.* x «
h u "a 01
O O 9 i-l
14 9 JJ . 0 S ep
•a o o)
9 >, >, ^H e
•u *o *a o o
a 9 » 3 -H 1-1
u jj jj S JJ
jj ffl o ffl 3 ffl
,-4 >,lw >, «H 3
•H OOU-i CO Q. B.
B. O 01 O U O
r-l r-t B.
01 O 01 O >"
4J T^ M -rt > r-l
oi e 3 S  ,
o a. x a. < a.
U U 4) 4) Z CD












CO
r*.
oe
CM
o
CN_

O O O 'O O £


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO.    OHD
      Offsite Monitoring-Unallocated (F110)
                                                    REG.         APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

      The ORD Reimbursable Program is the result of a long standing agreement
      between EPA and the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide monitoring
      services to the DOE in response to specific DOE requirements and programs
      at and around the Nevada Test Site and other test sites and storage sites
      around the United States.
  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

      In FY-78 the program provided:

      - Comprehensive radiological and other environmental surveillance in the
        area adjacent to the DOE Nevada Test Sites;

      - Environmental sampling and monitoring;

      - Investigations of environmental incidents;

      - Research and field investigations to determine environmental effects
        and develop methods to assess human exposure rates.


  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

      In FY-79 the EPA will:

      - Deploy mobile and aerial monitoring teams for every nuclear test;

      - Conduct annual visits to all Plowshare and other test sites to monitor
        groundwaters;,

      - Conduct periodic surveillance of animals in and around the Nevada Test
        Sites;

      • Continue past programs on radionuclides and biologic studies to asses?
        the transport of trans-uranic compounds in animals.
                    »
      The present form and method of operation of the ORD reimbursable program is
      specified by the DOE-EPA Interagency Agreement. EPA is to provide positions
      to support the program. All dollar costs are reimbursed by the Department
      of Energy. Areas of effort are mutually agreed upon by DOE and the
      Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vegas. Contractural
      support has been considered for numerous phases of the contract. Contractor
      will be used to augment present in-house capabilities when required.
 EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
• ••>••••••••••••••••••• mmm»mm»~*mm»mmmmmmttmommmm»mmm*>*mm mmmmi
A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       M£DIAf  RAD
F110  OFFSITE MONITORING-UNALLOCATED              APPROf  R & 0
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 03 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT
. 105.0



FY 79 C. E.
52.0

78.5

FY 80 INCR
30.0

ai.o

FY 80 CUM
30.0

fll.O

  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   This level will provide a. framework that meets about one-half of the DOE
 requirements as stipulated in the DOE Interagency Agreement.   Specific areas  to
 be tasked are:

   - Deploy monitoring teams in the off-site area for every nuclear test
     conducted at the Nevada Test Sites  to document radiation levels and provide'
     public protection in the event of an emergency.  Warn populace of potential
     seismic effects from tests and perform radiological monitoring as needed;
   - Conduct annual visits to each Plowshare and Vela Uniform nuclear site
     in the United States. Samples ground waters to assure that no radioactivity
     is transported to off-site water supplies;
   - Continue the inventory of significant radionuclides from selected locations
     on the Test Site using biological monitors. Appropriate studies such as
     metabolism, inhalation and resuspension studies will be conducted. Operate
     the Nevada Test Site Farm;
   - Conduct periodic surveillance of domestic and wild animals on and around
     the Nevada Test Site to assess radionuclide burden and detect pathological
     changes. Investigate claims of damage to domestic animals and wildlife
     resulting from the activities of the Nevada Operations Office of DOE;
   - Conduct studies of the biological availability of and internal transport
     of trans-uranic elements resulting from nuclear tests in animals. Provide
     information on gastrointestinal adsorption, blood-milk transfer,  blood -
     tissue transfer and retention as well as rates of fecal and urinary
     excretion of trans-uranic radionuclides.

  BENEFITS

    -Provides continuing information on the transport and mobility of radio-
     nuclides resulting from nuclear activities.
    -Assures safety of civilian population living around the Nevada Test Sites
     and other nuclear test sites.
    -Provides a base of information which can be used to evaluate potential
     hazards of nuclear activities to man.

  CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING

    -No measure of radiation exposure to assure health and safety of the off-site
     population.
    -Inadequate biological data for promulgating radionuclide standards.
    -No information on transport/retention/excretion of radionuclides entering
     the food chain.
    -No,data on contribution of game animals to human body burden of radioactive
     *j
     -No  capability to  evaluate claims of  radiation damage  to  livestock.	
    Form 2410-11 (8.78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2i DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE . MO
F110 OFFSITE MONITORING-UNALLOCATED
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL ' OPFT
02 OF 03 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
105.0 52.0
78.5
MEDIA! RAD
APPROl R & D
FY 80 INCR
12.0
6.0

FY 80 CUM
42.0
47.0
  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.' DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF WOT FUNDING.
  This  level will enable  EPA to  complete 68% of  the  in-house  effort  required
  to  meet  the  minimum DOE requirements  (as  stipulated  in  the  DOE  Interagency
  Agreement).  Contractor  personnel will be  utilized  to augment  the program
  'to  answer  all  the DOE requirements. Specific areas to be  tasked are:

  - Deploy monitoring teams  in the offsite  area  for  every nuclear test
    conducted  at the  Nevada  Test Site to document radiation levels and
    provide  public protection in the  event  of an emergency. Warn  populace of
    potential  seismic effects from tests and perform radiological monitoring
    as  needed;
  - Conduct  annual visits to  each Plowshare and  Vela Uniform  nuclear site in
    the United States. Sample ground  waters to assure  that  no radioactivity is
    transported  to offsite water supplies;
  - Continue the inventory of significant radionuclid es from  selected locations
    on  the Test  Site  using biological monitors.  Appropriate studies  such as
    metabolism,  inhalation and resuspension studies  will  be conducted.  Operate
    the Nevada Test Site  Farm;
  - Conduct  periodic  surveillance of  domestic and wild animals  on and around  the
    Nevada Test  Site  to assess radionuclide burden and detect pathological
  *  changes. Investigate  claims  of damage to  donestic animals  and wildlife
    resulting  from the activities of  the Nevada  Operations  Office of DOE;
  - Conduct  studies of the biological availability of  an  internal transport of
    trans-uranic elements resulting from nuclear tests in animals. Provide
    information  on gastrointestinal adsorption,  blood-milk  transfer, blood -
    tissue transfer and retention as  well as rates of  fecal and urinary
    excretion  of trans-uranic radionucj-ides.
  BENEFITS
   -  Provides  continuing  information  on  the  transport  and  mobility of  radio-
     nuclides  resulting from nuclear  activities.
   -  Assures safety  of civilian  population living  around the  Nevada Test  Site  and
     other nuclear test sites.
   -  Provides  a  base on information which  can  be used  to evaluate'potential
    .hazards of  nuclear activities to man.
  CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING
   -  No measure  of  radiation  exposure  to  assure health  and  safety  of  the  offsite
     popultation.
   -  Inadequate  biological data  for promulgating  radionuclide  standards.
   -  No information on  transport/retention/excretion  of radionuclides entering
     the  food  chain.
   -  No data on  contribution  of  game animals  to human body  burden  of  radioactive
     pollutants.
   -  No capability  to evaluate claims  of  radiation damage to livestock.
J2U'
 £PA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
   U-l
   e
   z  a.
   c  «
   i-  r
   >-  z
   o  n
   UJ  CO
   _1 O
   «t tr>
   ^- uj
   Z or
   uj
   r •-
   r •-
   c z
    >  Z
    Z  O
    UJ  »~
       cr>
    in  — i
    uj  u
    •-  UJ
    <  o
    t—
    CIS  ••
       K>
    o
    U_  i.
    »-  cr
    1-1  o
    z  u.
    ZJ
C?'  3
          z  <
          UJ Z
          Q. I
          O (9
          > a:
          UJ C
          o •-
co en
uj u.
a. u.
   o

< c
                   cc
                   o- «
                      en
                      UJ
                   CO «T
                   0 —•
O >-
cc <
o- _i
o r
CC UJ
o- cr
   (0
O- UJ
                   c- a:
                   "" S
                      o
                   O- I-
                   — O
                        ru
                        to
                                                                e
                                                                 •
                                                                (M
                                           in
                                           o
                                         O Q.  O U.
                            u. z cc z; o
                            o >- r> s •«  —
                               3 o < »»  to
                            — « X IT     Z
                            e       *- co  c
                               »- z x >•  «
                            _J UJ — UJ <  t-
                                           c
                                           o             —
                                           •»          >- U. UJ
                                        KV «    _l ~ U. O. •-
                                        e       < e a O u.
                                            . UJCt O    «-«-
                                        u. X «Z> O
                                        o •- n r •• ••
                                           3 O < ^* CO
                                        «vi < x a:    z
                                        o       H- to c
                                           »- Z x >- «
                                        — I UJ *^ UJ < *-
         > c
         uj z;
                                            cc
                                            o
                                                           UJ 5
                                                           _i cc
                                                             •- CO
                                                             D O
                                                             o a

-------
o

LU
U
LU
K
o
c
a.
Si
>  w
2  »

111S
    LU
    S

    CO
   a.
   ^
   O
    2
    O
   U
   LU
   Q
   CC
   O
   u.
c
o

ra a
— * »{
"U fif
(0
C£
.. a.'
< O
LU £
s <





a
a
O

t
O LU
"Z. C




o"
— 1
•o

LU

|
I
Ul
Ul
1
1
_J
Ul
^
Ul
1

1
J
LU
>
Ul
1
•xj
J
Ul
Ul
1
Ul
Ul
J

a>

~ O
u, a.


Ul
^
r»» 2
a> 5
> Ej
U. Ul




Ul
K
=>

^
Ul
5
Ul
H
•w
^
K
Ul
5
«2
	 i
ACCOMPI
0



- •


















tM
-

O 	 	
t



J^
•A




in
O
f~t



'
JJ
CO
i£2 •

^i
a) n
JS, U
gl

ca ec
a» u ._ •
O 0) ^ •
•^ c S
> w 3
m ij_j ^*
MJJ ? '
= c £
^ 0) O . •
SB
*J 14 « 'tO I
•^ «o « Jt C -t
c a. JJ
o « •*
2 Q to























































— ^
•i
J
^
O
j
e.


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
CRITERIA, STANDARDS & GUIDELINES (F205)
HO
REG.
OANR MEDI A: Radiation
APPRO: A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The major objective of this Decision Unit is to develop and promulgate
  environmental standards and Federal guidelines which minimize the popula-
  tion's  exposure to ionizing radiation from nuclear energy applications,
  naturally-occurring radioactive materials, medical and occupational
  exposures, and nonionizing radiation sources. In addition, the Clean Air Act
  Amendments of 1977 requires a determination of radioactive pollutants impact
  on public health and the development and promulgation of appropriate air
  pollution standards.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Criteria were proposed for the disposal of radioactive waste.  Federal
  guidelines were proposed for clean-up of plutonium contaminated soils.-  In
  cooperation with HEW, guidelines were promulgated for protection from
  radiation in the use of diagnostic X-rays.  Documentation was completed for
  a determination of the need for guidance for the control of general popu-
  lation exposures to nonionizing radiation.                        »
  D)
   FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
     The Clean Air Act determination and listing of radioactive pollutants
which may endanger public health will be completed.  Work will begin on
any necessary regulations for control of such pollutants.  Criteria and
standards for disposal of radioactive waste and guidelines for clean-up of
plutonium—contaminated soils will be promulgated.  Final recommendations for
protection from exposure to radiation associated with Florida phosphate-re-
lated lands will be published.  Standards for land and ocean disposal of
low level wastes will be initiated, as will be regulations for uranium
milling wastes.  Other work underway will be protective action guides for
airborne materials and food pathways, and guidance for general population
and occupational exposure, nonionizing radiation (if required) and environ-
mental standards for release of carbon-14 (which also may be a candidate
under the Clean Air Act).
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2i DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A. DECISION  UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HO       M£DIA|  RAO
F205  CRITERIA, STDS *  GDLNSCINC EIS PREP)"RAD  APPRO|  A  4 C

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C.  E.   FY 60  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          49.0          66.0          50,0         SO.'O
 LEVEL              OPFT                         4.0           4.0           a.O
01 OF 05             FTE                        68.8          63.7         63.7
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     2,612.0      2,449.6      2,737.2      2,737.2
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          Actions required by the Clean Air Act and those related to the  disposal
     of  radioactive wastes are given the highest priority.  Standards  will be
     promulgated as required to cover the most important sources of  airborne
     radiation.  Potential sources include  uranium fuel cycle facilities; DOE and
     DOD facilities uranium mines, mills  and tailings and phosphate  mines and
     plants.   Alternate methods and strategies for the control of radon will be
     investigated.  High level waste criteria and standards, published in 1979
     will  be implemented by other Federal agencies but will require  overview by
     and consultation'with EPA.   Work on  low level waste standards,  transuranic
     waste and waste from decommissioning and decontaminating facilities will
     continue  but at a low sustaining level.  A protective action guide for
     contaminated equipment will be published.  Follow-up consultation and'
     assistance will be given on implementation of previously published regula-
     tions (plutonium clean-up, drinking  water, residential exposure to radon).

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

          This level provides a minimum standards-setting function for radiation
     protection under .EPA authorities.   Failure to fund means that the require-
     ments of  the Clean Air Act cannot be met, hence the desire for  control of
     airborne  radioactivity will be frustrated.  Guidance to Federal agencies and
     the -States in key problem areas will not be available.  EPA will  be  unable
     to  meet  its commitments in the development of a sound radioactive waste
     disposal  management system and policies.  No Federal focal point  will exist
     to  consider the overall impacts of the total array of radiation sources  on
     public health and the environment.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 ORM  2J  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          HO     .  MEDIAi RAD
F205  CRITERIA,  STDS  &  GDLNSCINC  EIS PREP)-RAD  APPRCJg A  4 C
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY
49,0


2/612.0
79 C. E.
66.0
«.o
68.6
2,449.6
FY 80 INCR
10.0

5.0
507.4
FY 80 CUM
60.0
4.0
68.7
3,284.6
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS'LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          This level allows the maintenance of present schedules for considering
     and providing criteria and standards  on various types of radioactive wastes.
     These schedules,  however,  lag  the  needs of other Federal agencies  by one
     to three years.  The development of standards to insure the environmental
     acceptability of low level waste management will be initiated.   The develop-
     ment of standards for ocean  disposal  of radioactive waste will  be  initiated.
     Development of standards  for uranium  mill tailings will be completed and
     a standard proposed.

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

          Impact of low level  radioactive  wastes is a major problem  which is the
     subject of a multi-Agency effort to develop solutions.  Two principal
     methods which are candidates for acceptance are shallow land burial and
     ocean disposal; this level supports the EPA program to ensure the  environ-
     mental acceptability of these  methods.  Failure to fund this level would
     prevent EPA from providing necessary  inputs to the required environmentally
     sound solutions to these  disposal  problems as required by overall  Federal
     Government commitments to energy program options.
                                                                     J21 7
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2s DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HO       MEDIAf RAD
F205  CRITERIA, STDS & GDLNSUNC  EI3 PRCP)»RAD  APPRO! * *  C

B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E,   FY  80 1NCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          49.0         66,0           6,0         66,0
 LEVEL              OPFT                        4.0                         «,0
03 OF 05             FTE                       68.8           3.0         71,7
   BUDGET  AUTH. (000.0)     2,812.0      2,449.6         365.0     3i649,6
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          At  least one additional source will be considered for  regulation under
     the Clean Air Act and the standards developed and published.  A potential
     candidate would be a non-uranium mining and milling industry.

          Implementation guidance will  be published for the non-ionizing
     radiation.   The multiplicity and complexity of the types  of sources causing
     the exposures will require some instruction to other agencies to expedite
     effective control and monitoring.

          The Uranium Fuel cycle standards will be followed up by efforts to en-
     courage  international control of long-lived effluents from  this process.
     The majority of future U.S. population exposure to these  types of radio-
     activity may come from foreign nuclear power production.

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

          Without this level, coverage  of airborne radioactive effluents is
     limited, and population exposures  to the unregulated sources will continue
     unabated.  Existing regulations for nonionizing radiation exposure at radio
     frequencies and for the uranium fuel cycle operations will  have their
     effectiveness diluted through improper implementation or  failure to obtain .
     control  of major sources.  Since the U.S. is leader in regulatory control
     of materials emitted in the uranium fuel cycle, EPA support of this inter-
     national effort is critical.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



















z
UJ
o
<
^
z or
o •«
»- f.
*- r
0 3
UJ CO
O UJ
a? u
o» or
3
_) O
« to
t- UJ
2 or
UJ
I »-
Z i->
O 2
or 3
> 2
2 O
UJ "->
CO —
UJ CJ
*- u
< e
 C1
f* ^
rv rv
nj o-
r* o
Kl O-
fk. 9
•k *
rv AJ
rw o-
• •
fkk O
ft 01
f- 9
* <*
ru ru

nj O-
• »
r» o
f*l 0-
fo. y
«. «b
ru ru





r\j AJ o o- e> o r-
r- f- o o o ^ f^
K) o- ^ o- in ,c
f-- Ki K! ^
^ » *. «fc.
iv *« ** rv





ru A* o o- c o f>
fwr* c. o o « KV
t^ r** K; ? ^ "*
«* * * *
rw *• *-« rvi




<; *c c -* o o a?
O-  ^-- _l <-> U. O- 1-
o < o a o u.
• uj or o <~ >^
u. T co 3 e
o •- 3 z •» ••
3 O * ^ CC
— •< I or z
o *- o: o
>- Z x >- »
_J UJ •- UJ < •-

> C. t- CO
ttl 3 30
_i er o a
-c c
? o-
CO CO
ru o-
KI rv
•a o
sr t>
CO CC
rv o
* *
KI rv
* 0

^ o
CC CC
ru o-
* ^
KI rv

•0 C
• •
JT CJ-
CC CC
t\i e-
^ ^
KI ru





.c ,c o o e> o r-.
:> a o o- o a cc
CO O CC CO ^ &
rvr- «n o

KI — — ru





sr si o — o o
r» r- o «o e in
in KI ru IT






.c o o — e o cc
O- « Kl t> 4> s cc
3- r* f»- ru * ^
JT CD IT rv

ru — nt





e o oo o
ru — -~ - -•
_1 UJ — U.' « H-
uj o ^» «-' — » —i
> c »- co
UJ 3 3 O
_J ff O O.
-c rvi
rj- —
a ru

f*l t^
-C  KI o- o a cc

u cc IT ru

ru — ru





o o oo- o
ru — — cc o-
— e — in »
co -c ru in
cv — — ru






e
Q
O v-
w t- u, u.1

C < O tL O IL
• ui Or o — •—
U-X CO 3 0
o t- 3 r •» «•
3 O « ^ «B
Kl< z ft 2
0 (- CO C
t- 2 X >- >-.

UJ 15 ^ — _I ~
> C. t- V.
UJ 3 3 O
-ice o a
cc
 I
Kt
 I
 O

-------
u
z
UJ
o
LU
H
o
tr
a.
II

ll
> w
Z w
UJ H

  UJ
  u
  Z

  g

  C/5

  O
  UJ

  Q
  'CC
  o
  u_
e
o
•^
4J
to u
•H
*O fcfl
to
06 <
MEDIA:
APPROP.




i
o
C)
O LU
I CC

/"N
m
0
CM
to
e
•H
0)
-a
•H
O
•a
to

en
13
CO
•O
CO
CO
•H
01
JJ
•H
U

UJ
a
o
u
a
z
^
••~*
UJ
H
I—
Z
o
z
o
o
LU
O
<







LISHMENTS
a.
Q
U
<
LU
-J
p

i
>
LL





_J
UJ
UJ
-J
1

[ LEVEL.


LU
>
LU
j
UJ
UJ
-1
H
Ul
UJ
-J
H
_J
UJ
UJ


IS.
2 -»'
o
> c
u. a.

LU
CO <
IV. 5
o> 5
*• ^
U. LU


LU
e
M
^
UJ
2
LU

.
P
t-
z
LU
I
(O
a.
O
o
o
<
GO














^0



UO



•3-
»















CO
•a
Lj
tO
•o
to
4-1
w
0
CO
o
•H
CO
TH
bo
(11
cd
















































GO
CO
«N
t
O
J»,
g
o
u.
o.
LU

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ          MEDIA:Radiation
   RADIATION MANAGEMENT  (F210)                      R£	ApPRO:A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

       The major objective of  the Regional Radiation Management decision unit
   is  to  ensure  that  technologically sound radiation protection concepts are
   integrated  into Regional decision making.  This objective is to be achieved
   in  the Regions primarily through the reviewing of Environmental Impact
   Statements  for light-water reactors and uranium mining and milling.  Addi-
   tionally, the objective will be met by providing support to the development
   of  standards and guidelines  for radiation protection.  Subordinate activities
   leading to  the achievement of  the objective are the provision of public and
   technical information and the  strengthening of State and local government
   radiation programs.


  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Forty-eight draft and final EIS's were reviewed by the Regional Offices.
   These  generally related to conventional light-water reactors and uranium
   mining and  milling.  The number of reviews/Region ranged from as low as one
   to  as  high  as twelve.  Six regions completed four or more reviews.  An
   average of  about three-fourths of a person-year per region was devoted to
   assisting State and local -agencies in strengthening their programs.  Techni-
   cal  and general information  was provided to the public on a request basis.
   Other  activities which varied  by region included assistance to the water
   program on  radionuclides in  drinking water and investigations of special
   problems, such as uranium mill tailings on Indian lands.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       Approximately 58 draft and final EIS's will be reviewed.  The level of
  assistance  to State and  local agencies will be maintained at about the FY
  1978 level.  Public information will be provided on a request basis.  Assis-
  tance  to the Water program and special investigations will be carried out
  selectively at about the FY 1978 level.
                                                                 J2
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  ^t DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSTS
•~m*»mmm»mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm*mm»mm»mmt
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          RG       MEUIAj RAD
F210  RADIATION MANAGEMENT               '           APPROi A 4  C
B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 76  ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY  80 JNCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         20.0         17.0          n.o          13.0
.LEVEL              OPFT           3.0          2.0           3.0           30
01  OF  08             FTE                       21.a          i«j,3          19 3
    BUDGET AUTH.  (QOQ.Q)	564.0        563.7         503.3         503)3
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description  and  Benefits

         Regional radiation expertise  facilitates the integration of  technologi-
    cally sound  radiation concepts into regional decision making  on any problem
    where radiation  exposure is a factor.

         At this level all regional offices will be able to carry out required
    EIS reviews.  Six Regional Offices will be able to provide a  limited amount
    of consultation  to State agencies  on  general program, emergency response
    planning,  and implementation of drinking water standards for  radiation.  A  .
    limited response will be made to public inquiries.

    Impact of  Not Funding This Level
                                                                   \
         The routine EIS's will not be reviewed.  In all probability many or
    most of these will be referred to  Headquarters where time will thus be lost
    from other priority activities. The  regional base of expertise will be lost,
    thus any Clean Air Act generated activities in 1981 which should  be operated
    from the regional level will be delayed.  More requests for public informa-
    tion will  be referred to Headquarters.  Valuable contacts with State programs
    will be lost or  complicated.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION A'GENCY

FORM  2J DECISION  UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE    '     RG       MEDIA? RAD
F210  RADIATION MANAGEMENT                         APPROi A  & C
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY
20.0
3.0

564.0
79 C. E.
17.0
2.0
21. a
563.7
FY so INCR
2.0

1.0
17.7
FY 80 CUM
15.0
3.0
20.3
521.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          Two  additional r egions will be able  to maintain an adequate level of
     liaison and consultation with State programs and a reasonable  response level
     to public inquiries.

     Impact of Not Funding This Level

          Some breakdown of State relations will occur.  There will be  an in-
     crease in referrals to Headquarters with  essentially the same  cost in
     resources otherwise utilized on Headquarters priority tasks.
                                                                   U21-3
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2} DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE
F210  RADIATION  MANAGEMENT
RG
        RAD
APPRDi  A &  C
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY
20.0
3.0

564.0
79 C. E.
17.0
2.0
31. «
563.7
FY 80 INCR
2.0

1.0
•78.3
FY 80 CUM
17.0
3.0
21.3
599 3
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and Benefits
        All regional offices will  have at least one professional staff member.
   A minimum acceptable level of State liaison and consultation will be main-
   tained.  Priority public inquiries will be responded to in all Regions.
   Limited field investigations can  be undertaken on high priority problems.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level
        Assistance by regional personnel in investigations relating to  accidental
    releases of radioactivity,  development of information for Clean Air  Act
    Regulations, and the development  of radioactive waste disposal criteria  and
    standards will be lost.  Investigations will be slowed down or not made.   An
    adequate level of State contact will not be maintained in two regions.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------

3
CO
o-

CO
o- ••»
— . CO
UJ
z
UJ

ru u
CC Z
O- M
— 2
Z
-1
n.
>-
U
z
u cc
< o-
>• ~-
2 Z
O <
*- r •
UI CO
O UJ
a u ui
3 _i
_» O S» H-
« CO «C <
t- UJ O -J
z a — 3
u z
Z I- 3
Z — U
o z
a. ID
3» Z •-
Z O Z
UJ «-f UJ
09 01
IO «•* CO Ut
uj u o- a
« 0 '*" Z
CO »
Kl
O
UJ Z
t- or •-
*^ O CO
Z U. O UJ
Z) r-
c- oi
— a
_j
cc <
»- 3
•" U
z
UI
UJ
u
2
^
z
2
0
»-t
^>
«o «:
r •-
0 0
*-i <
U OL.
UJ
a: c
*•
t- ru
a u.
Kl 0
Kl Kl
o in


Kl •»
o to
in a


Kl 0
• V
Kl Kl
o in
in a


Kl C
Kl Kl
O IT
in 3





KI KI s; e o KI
Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl O-
o o in ~« «*
in in a







Kl Kl O O O Kl
Kl Kl Kl Kl Kl O-
eo in — —i
in m =r






f» f~ Kl 0 O ST
Kl Kl P» 1^  O 0
a- w r- o KI
* •*> o ru
tn in in




Q
s
o >-
«• >- U. UJ
c- « o o. o u.
• UJ Qi O ^ W*
u. x co r c
c »- o z « ••
« o < ^* to
— < x or z
0 t- CO O
*~ 2 ^ ^ ^^
_) UJ — LJ < »-
UJ td ^^ *^ J >-t
> a H- co
u.1 3 O O
-J CC O tk.
o c-
— CO
ru ^
in a
o o-
— cc
ru *
in a


o o-
A •
— CO
ru -c
in a


o o-
— • CO
ru -c
in =r





o o o o o KI
_ — co in KI o
ru ru •*> — ru
in in a







t- r- o- c o
r- r- inrvi —
^> wt w*







1- r- KI o o a
KIKI »- f. fU —
«  o ^- co
UJ S 3 O
_i tr oo.
KI a
o- o-
O- Kl
in in
KI a
O- O
O Kl
in in


KI a
• •
c- o-
O- Kl
in to


KI a
If O-
0- Kl
in in





Kl Kl a O O Kl
O- 0- 0- »-KI —
o tf K>— ru
in in in







KI KI mo o
cc co e ru —
l*» f* V*^







r» »•- KI o o 9
KIKI »-»» IM —
« < c — > ru
in tn tn

o o o o o
-o * oru
intn in




e
o
O »"
•> 1- U. UI
o < oo. o u.
• u tr c ^> ^
U, X CO 3 C
O t- => X •» —
r; o « ~ co
KI« x or 2
o »- 03 o
H- Z X >- w
.J U) *•* UI * H-
Ul O *^ ^^ «1 ••*
> O t- ID
uj o rs o
_1 CC O O-
CO
f-
 I

-------
  o
  Z
  LU
  O
  <

  Z
  o


  o
  UJ
  t-
  o
  cc
  o_
  0 i
  sl
  > w
  Z JO
  Ul H

    LU
    S
    X
    CO
    O
    o
    o
    Z
    g

    CO

    o
    UJ
    Q
U212
    'DC

    O
    U-
C
o
•fH
U
CO O
•H
^3 ^J
«

.. a.'
< O
sl




X

O UJ
I CC









o
t-l
CN
fc
Nvf*
4-)
(U
E
CU
oc
CO

CO
2
C
O
•H
CO
•H
T3
CO
PS


UJ
O
0
U
Q
Z
<
LU
J
^
H
Z
3
DECISION
<







C/9
Z
LU
s
Q.
O
u
u

D
s
i
*~
^»
u.







LU
LU



_,
LU
LU
J
UJ
^
LU
H
LU
LU
H
_j
LU
^
LU
_J
1
_1
LU
LU
~*

2
2 ->
>§
u. o.



LU
K
p. S
0) 5
V™ ^
^ e/J
LU LU





LU
CC
in
LU
S
«3
LU

t
H
L^
Z
LU
I
CO
ACCOMPLI
m















in IH


CN O
tn rH



CM 00
in
*






















r-4 CO
CO 4J
C U
•H 0)
"o1
"0 M
C 0.
CO
CO CO

iw a
CO 0)
M CO O.
T) * CO
(U T3
«-i -H u-i a)
O > O *J
0) CO
W M h iH
0) 4) 4-1
.aw .a -H
IS §5
!Z Z























































CD
C3
C4
*
O
•^
E
o
a.
a.


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (F215)
HO    OANR

REG.
                                                               MEDIARadiation

                                                               APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       This Decision Unit  has  three principal  objectives:   1)  to maintain an
  awareness of radiation in the  environment  from all  sources;  2)  to  make
  certain that environmental considerations  are a part  of  a major Federal
  nuclear programmatic decision  through  implementation  of  the  NEPA process;
  and 3)  to provide  field,  laboratory  and  engineering analyses and documenta-
  tion to support  the development,  promulgation and implementation of  EPA
  regulations.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Passage  of  the  Clean Air Act  caused  a  reorientation of  the  FY  1978
  program.   Field  studies  and evaluations were initiated  to provide definitive
  information on a variety of sources  and radioactive  substances which might
  be  subject to regulation under  the act.   Specific  areas were coal fired
  electric  generating  plants,  uranium  mining,  non-uranium mining  (zinc,  iron,
  phosphates, limestone  and others)  and  facilities in  the uranium  fuel cycle
  (in cooperation  with NRC).   Assessment of problems associated with'shallow
  land burial of low level waste  continued.  A report  of  studies of ocean
  dumping  of low level waste was  developed  and is currently in the printing
  process.   Investigation  continued  on uranium mill  tailing piles  and methods
  of  stabilization of  such piles.  EIS related reviews were completed on 21
  items related to generic concepts  and  advanced nuclear  technology.  The
  Environmental Ambient  Monitoring System (ERAMS) was  operated and the third
  annual Report on Radiological Quality  of  the Environment was published.
  Evaluations were completed on problems relating to decommissioning  of  nuclear
  facilities and are continuing on the siting  of such  facilities.

  D)   FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       Ongoing  studies will be continued, additional studies initiated on
  mineral  extraction industries geothermal  power sources,  and  DOE  and NRC
  licensee  facilities  will be evaluated.  Ambient variations in radon levels
  will be  studied.  Assessments will be  completed of all  data  required for
  determination and listings  under the Clean Air Act.  Studies will continue
  on  low level  shallow land waste disposal  sites.  Reports will be published
  on  two of the previously studied sites and  on low  level ocean disposal.
  Investigations of uranium mill  tailings will continue.   Development will
  begin on  criteria for  ocean disposal site selection, monitoring, and waste
  packaging.  ERAMS will be operated and associated  reports published.   Generic
  EIS  reviews will be  made in 15-20  situations.

                                                                   J2L7
EPA Form 2410-10(8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
^          ^ ™ ™ W»^ W • w  w w^^ W^ W W w w w W •• • W*9 ' W » W W • ^ w^ V "'B 9 •• tt W VflV • W 4B
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HO       M£DIA| RAO
F215  ENVIR  IMPACT ASSESSMNT-RAO                   APPROj A &  C
W W • • W *• • W • ••4B4B ••••••• •• • • • ••• • • • • • • • ^ MlM ^M^ ^ ^^M •• ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^MMM ^ ^ ^ ^ m* ^^ ^  ^
B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 80 INCR   FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        los.o         99.0          75,0         75.0
 LEVEL              OPFT                        «.0           a.O          
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
LEVEL
01 05

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Environmental Impact  Assessment  (F215)
  (continuation)
                   HQ OANR

                   REG.
MEDIA:Radiation

APPRO:A&C
  B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY80INCR.
      FY80CUM.
  ocean disposal would be delayed and the environmental concerns a-bout the
  radioactive waste issue would remain unresolved.   EPA would not be keeping
  pace with other agencies'  activities in the radioactive waste disposal
  area.
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
FORM  21 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDIA|  RAO
F2J5  ENVIR  IMPACT ASSESSMNT-RAD                  APPROI  Ate

B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79  C.  E.   FY 80  JNCR "%Y*tO  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         108.0  .       99.0          ia,o         89.o
 LEVEL              OPFT                         4,0                         4.0
03  OF 05             FTE                       109,2           7,0         99,7
    BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     4,004.0      4,718.6        947,8      5,679.9
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and  Benefits

         This level  supports the carrying out of  field experiments at two .
    existing shallow land burial sites in different climatic and geological
    regimes to assist in the definition of the  ways radionuclides can escape
    such sites in ground or surface water or by emission to the air.  The data
    will be used to  further develop and validate  predictive models for the
    transport of radionuclides from such sites.   The data and its application
    are crucial parts of the technical support  documentation for criteria and
    standards for disposal of such w,astes.  Site  selection criteria and monitor-
    ing requirements will be developed for ocean  disposal of low level wastes.

         Limited follow up will be carried out  on major generic EIS's and
    important Federal actions with radiation impacts.  Implementation guides will
    be provided for  radiation portions of the drinking water standard 'and the
    plutonium land clean-up guidance.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         Standards for ocean disposal and shallow land burial would be delayed
    beyond their scheduled date at a. time when the  activities of other agencies
    are being affected by the  lack of environmentally acceptable radioactive
    waste standards  and EPA is being pressed to speed up its schedules.  No
    uniform guidance would be  available to the states for independent monitoring
    of drinking water or plutonium so that hazardous situations might not be
    detected or corrected.  EPA's opportunity to  resolve issues through follow-
    up on EIS's and major Federal actions would be eliminated.
               •J3U
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2l DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HQ      MgOIAt  RAO
F215  ENVIR  IMPACT ASSESSMNT-RAD      .            APPROf  A &  C

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY  •     FY  78 ACT  FY  79  C.  E.   FV 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        108.0          99.0          10.0          99.0
 LEVEL              OPFT                        tt.O                         a.O
03  OF 05             FTE                      109.2           5.0         104.7
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     4,004.0      4,716.6	632.7      fe,312.b
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   Description and Benefits

        Funding this level provides the States and regional  offices with an air
   cleaning systems manual for  use during their inspections  to  see what systems
   are in place in determining  compliance with the CAA standards in FY 1981.
   Technical support is provided  to determine the need for standards  development
   under the CAA for promulgation in  a  second round of regulation in  FY 1981 or
   1982 for non-uranium mines and mills where the potential  hazards are presently
   largely unknown.  Pre-EIS liaison  for major Federal EIS's will provide a
   resolution of many environmental issues before EIS's are  prepared  and minimize
   interagency disagreements after the  EIS's are prepared.   The resources would
   also permit a limited  degree of in-house evaluation of proposed nuclear
   alternatives prior to  large  commitments of resources to such new technologies.
   Data will be collected on extremely  high voltage line radiation to develop
   guidance to limit exposure  and health effects from this source of'non-
   ionizing radiation.

   Impact of Not Funding This  Level

        The air cleaning technology manual would not be available for use in
   determining compliance with  the CAA.  Standards would not be developed if
   required for non-uranium  mines and mills and the extent of the potential
   hazards would remain unknown.  Environmental issues could not be resolved
   until the EIS review stage,  which  promotes interagency disputes.   No support
   would run the risk that proposed nuclear alternatives would be found
   environmentally unacceptable after the fact.  Federal guidance would not be
   developed and radiation exposure from extremely high voltage lines would
   continue to cause health  effects.
                                                                     J3U
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2i  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
F2i5 ENVIR IMPACT ASSESSMNT-RAD
HQ
MEDIA|
APPRO |
RAO
A & C
B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY 8Q  INC*    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT        108.0         99.0           8.0         107.0
 LEVEL              OPFT                         4.0                         4.0
04  OF  05             FTE                      109.2           8.0         H2.7
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     4,004.0      4,718.6      3,360.0      9,672.6
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          The purpose of this  level is  to accelerate the radioactive waste dis-
     posal program so that  the schedule will be consistent with the needs of
     the overall Federal program.  EPA's present schedule is lagging one to
     three years behind these  requirements.  The proposed activities are as
     follows:

     1)   Uranium Mill Tailings:  There is an urgent need for EPA to carry out
     field examinations of  alternate  methods for disposal of newly generated
     tailings, 15 million tons per year, as well as methods for stabilizing
     existing piles (approximately 40 sites containing about 140 million tons).
     The field investigations  will involve both test sites for DOE proposed
     methods and existing sites with  differing levels of stabilization.  The
     ultimate end products  in  addition  to interim advice to NRC will be EPA
     Generally Applicable Environmental Standards for Mill Tailings Disposal
     which will form the basis for the  NRC final regulation.

     2)   Other Low Level Wastes:  To maintain consistency with NRC and DOE
     requirements and responsibilities  in this area, EPA will accelerate its
     program to generate the required criteria and  standards for both land and
     ocean disposal by 2 years (in 1982 instead of  1984).  The specific end
     products are environmental standards for land  disposal, criteria for ocean
     disposal sites and container requirements in support of issuance of ocean
     disposal permits, assistance in  establishment  of Federal Policy on existing
     sites requiring long term care.  The 1980 activities are to begin studies
     of two remaining unstudies burial  sites; accelerate documentation of support
     information on types and  volumes of waste for  land disposal; accelerate
     criteria for the packaging of wastes to withstand pressure and corrosion
     for periods as long as 100 years in the ocean; accelerate the development, of
     criteria for selecting ocean disposal  sites with minimum potential
     environmental impact;  accelerate development of monitoring requirements
     for selection of ocean sites  (currents, salinity, oxygen content, etc.)
     and requirements for surveillance  of future designated sites to assure
     adequate warning of radiation  leakage.

     3)   Decommissioning and  Decontamination  (D/D):  NRC and DOE can establish
     licensing requirements including the  internalization of the costs of ulti-
     mate D/D.   Such requirements  are dependent on  EPA standards specifying
     conditions  which will satisfy  public health and  safety objectives.  EPA
     presently plans to provide such standards by 1984.  NRC and DOE  are indi-
     cating  a need for  such standards in 1980  so that they may be used as  soon

            U3U
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Environmental Impact  Assessment (F215)
(continuation)
                                                   HQ OANR

                                                   REG.
                               MEDIA: Radiation

                               APPRO :A&C
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
                                                                   FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
-°1OF^_
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)










-





  possible in licensing constraints.   EPA must generate generally applicable
  standards and criteria for future sites alloTJin» s^'te by site evaluation
  of existing sites including those associated with restricted or conditional
  release of sites, facilities and equipment.   Residual activity limits  will
  be established in 1980.

  4)   Transurancics:   There are presently 14.7 million cubic feet of
  Transuranics in temporary containment in this country (most in shallow land
  burial).  Production is  expected to be between 0.25 million and 4.7 million
  cubic feet annually depending on the rate of decommissioning of facilities
  and the nature of the facilities.  ORP plans included starting the work on
  TRU specific standards in 1981 with completion scheduled in 1983.   The
  requirements of DOE and  NRC make necessary the beginning of the development
  of the standard in 1980  with completion in 1982.

  Impact of Not Funding This Level                                 ,
       As indicated above, EPA will be unable to_provide_its_inpu1:s to the	
 overall Federal program, thereby~delaying actions by other Federal agencies
 or forcing them to act without the requisite environmental inputs to their	
 decisions.Potentially the end result will be increased costs and confusion
 in the private sector as well as delay of crucial projects.      	 _,	
                                                                     J3l>
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------






















2
IctJ
ts
<
>-
2 IT
O <
*"^ I
*- Z
U 3
UJ 00
o uj
a: u
=
_J C
« CB
»- UJ
z or
UJ
r *-
2 ->
O 2
tr =>
> 2
Z O

en
CO >->
UJ O
(~ UJ
< c
eo —
o
u z
H- tr
2 u.
3





a
<
a
•z i
o •-
1- X
« en
1-1 CC
O U!
< CC
tr co
•c
^
UJ U
eo <
C Z
2 -i

» a
a »-
*•» >
< 2
UJ
<
"5 '.« 1"

r«- f\i
IV. U.

9
CO
a-


cc
o »-
» CO
UJ
t-
X
••H
*-
en
Ul

run
CD 2
O- i-"
— Z
2
«
a.

CO
0-
•-






UJ
^*
0 t-
CC f
O _1

X
o
u


•-
UJ
c z
CO Ul
O EC
— " CJ
2



CO
o- u
r»
e> tt
—
u

r- 3
o- »-
— 0
<


























ru o
KI a
r- in
a KI
„
ru o-
KI a
f- m
« •.
a KI



«••« ~*
• •
ru o-
KI a
i- in
* «
a KI

_ —
ru o-
KI a
f- in
Ik *
3 r*\




_ «x f*% — o o r»
ro AJ o- 9- IA 9 f\j
K1 ft C,* w P*- (*•
r^ ru cr ir
•. * e^ !»,
^ ru <\j K\





-* CC *O »< O O r**
f\) I\J O~ C" IT1 S3 *\i
F**K* o1 « r*- o-
*- *\* sr in
<»•>(»«.
9 fU f\i Kl




* O * O O O M
a: -c ru o- o- s» o*
-*  O1 f^ *D
O IT* W C- O
0 — C 0 —
^ *. * «
ty nt — HI







o
e
o •—
*5 1— IL. bJ
O < C ft. O ii.
• UJ CC O w ^*
u. x co r> o
c »- => r « —
3 O < ^ «0
— < X tt Z
C H- « O
t- 2 X >- *-«
_i UJ — It. -
^j ^5 *"* ^^ -J "^
> c. i- to
U. 3 30

a o
0 0
P- 43
4> ru
m a
t> e
O- e
r- *
•o ru
^ «
to a



o- o
• •
o o
r^ -c
•£> ru
^ «
m a

0 0
t> 0
F*-  a in e o o r-
» e> o o o a e>
r^ ry in o co o^
* f- o- ru
^ ^ ^ »
in ru ru a





cc -o ru o- o o
r- -o •• es a r~
a o- m •- •»
o a a r^






« o -t> o o o ru
•o -o ru e>- o a o-
»• « in KI c> e
r- r~ o- in —
a ru » K-.

o o o o o
a in o- K< co
o in a c &
=> — ec o —
^ fc ^ ^
a ru — KI







o
e
0 <-
«* »- U. U)
0 < C C. O U,
• uj a o « ^
u. X eo - o
S •- 3 X •» ~
3 o « ^ eo
ru < x tr z
o H- eo o
H" Z X >• •-«
_i ui •— u; «: >-
UJ h£ *"^ *"^ * ^^
> O f- eo
UJ 3 3 O
_i tr . o a

ru a
— Kl
Kl r^
•« a
-c tn
ru a
— KI
KI r-
^ «
* a



•c in
• »
ru a
— • KI
K\ r»
% «
•c a

•c tn
ru a
— KI
KI f^
^ ^
<6 a




* a rvj in c o r-
ru in »•* a o a a
-. «c (v KI o- o
KIO- Klr» —
^ * * »
* ru KI a





r- o f- in o o
ru •* -o a c in
KI in »- r- —
•o ru KI a






^ o - 1-1
_t UJ — UJ < >-
UJ C5 v^ %^ _J M
> O 1- 1C
Ul 3 3 O
— i ec o a.
•o in
ru a
f*. j/^
« ru
O 1-
* in
ru a
t- in
c ru
^ *
o r-



•e m

ru a
r- m
* ru
* ^
o- »-

-c in
ru 9
f- in
•C ru
fc ^
0- r~




•O ru a in o o »-
ru & ru a r- w ru
r- » >o in o »
* ru a ru — —
* « ^ »
cr- KI « t^





e eo ru c o o
o a in o cc x
« ru Kirvi
KI ru *• in
* » »
K> Kt IV




-A o ^ o o o ru
ec * ru o- O- a &
— •« in KI & e
t- r- o- m —
a ru — KI

o o o o o
am o K>«O
a in a o o
o — cc o —
^ « » »
a ru — KI







o
o
O t—
If, t- u. UJ
0 < C Q. C U.
• UJ or o «-^
li. X CO 3 O
o — 3 r v, —
3 o « ** ec
a < x t£ 2
o t- eo c
•- z x >- -.
_l UJ ~ UJ « t-
hj t» -'*-_)—.
> o H- to
UJ 3 3 O
.j cc o o.
          CO
•

-------
u
Z
UJ
o
o
LU
h-
O
CC
a.
^ cc

il
o i
cc 2

z w
UJ H-
  LU

  I
  O
  O
  o
  Z
  D

  Z
  O

  CO

  O
  UJ
  Q
  'CC
  o
  LL
c
o
•H
CO CJ
*O *^3
CO
OS <

.. CL
< 0
II




Z
o
_ d
O ui
x cc



m
iH
CNJ
fa
»— '
4J
C
0>
E
B
CO
(U
CO
CO
"*•
u
u
CO
ex
E
1— 4
fH
CO
g

0
M
C
W

_^
Ul
o
O
U
o
Z
-7r-

UJ
,
[^
H

2

Z
O
U
Ul
O
<








CO
Z
Ul
S
X
Zj
Q.
g
U
0

_l
i
o
09
cn
u.





I
^ J
Ul
Ul
— '

I
J
Ul
Ul
-"
i
Ul
>
Ul
d
Ul
Ul
I
^1
Ul
Ul
j
Ul

Ul


0)
eft •
"~ O
> CC
U. 0.



Ul
(-
a I
1— —
> to
U. Ul


Ul
cc

CO
Ul
C0
Ul
"••
r-
.

h-
Z
UJ
2
CO
_J
a.
I
O
CO













-a- r^ .*



>a- vo ^>




-


n in CM
*
















iw y-i a> vw
0 O 4J O
CO
4-1 4J CO 4J
M 4-1 MS )-,
o a o o
o. < a. at a
0. a > a
3 M 3 -H 3
03 -H 03 4J CO
< a
c c co c
•H S -HO -H
CO T-f 03
03 0) M T) 03 -O
4J rH JJ CO 4J M
M U MM M CO
O O O t3
a. oo a. oo a, c
CUCCO CDflCQ OlcO
M-H"O Mi-l-O M-u
O. M O. M 03
A o co ,c o co j:
r-f>COrH>Cfl,-I.C iJOL V
43 0) 4.) J3 0) 4.) 434J
3*O03 3-O03 3O
























































^
S
CO
fN
O
5
U.
0.
UJ

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ    OANR  MEDIA: Radiation
   STATE PROGRAM SUPPORT  (F220)
                                                   REG.         APPRO:   A&c
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
        The  State Program Support Decision Unit assists the States and Regions
   with laboratory  support  for  special analyses, emergency response planning
   assistance,  and  investigations of unplanned radiological incidents of nation
   al  and  State concern.  As a  service, a repository is provided and main-
   tained  for  disposal of radium sources.  Other Federal agencies are assisted
   with investigations, analyses, and evaluations of radiation problems beyond
   their normal capabilities.   The activities further the attainment of the
   overall program  objective of minimizing unnecessary exposure to radiation by
   enabling  the States to obtain control in situations where the States lack
   appropriate  expertise or equipment to obtain necessary environmental
   information  on a problem.

  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
        Approximately 70% of the priority requests of States and Regional
   Offices for  special analysis of radioisotopes were met.  Only a limited
   number  of requests for special field investigations could be responded to
   and those picked were generally instances where the urgency or possible
   application  of the resulting data to national problems dictated the decision
   to  respond.   Examples were an investigation of potential radon exposures re-
   sulting from the use of  phosphate SLAGS in building foundations and parking
   lots in Wyoming  and Montana  and the investigation of suspected health effect
   from non-ionizing radiation  in Eugene, Oregon.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       The  level of analytical support to State programs will be maintained at
   the  FY  1978 level, in part through the use of contracts.  A limited number
   of special investigations will be carried out.  The disposal service for
   radium  sources will be maintained.
        J3L3
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2J  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
    DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          HQ       MEDjAl RAO
 220  STATE  PROGRAM SUPPORT  "RAD                   APPROf A  t C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY  79 c,  E.   FY  BO INCH    FY so  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         13.0         10,0           8,0           8,0
 LEVEL              OPFT
01  OF 06             FTE                       11,5           9,0           9,0
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000,0)       406.0        «09,7         307.3        307,3
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and Benefits

         This decision unit provides  for the use of special expertise and  equip-
    ment to assist the States  or Regional Offices in solving unusual  radiation
    problems.  Generally the requests are for laboratory analysis  of  samples
    requiring expensive and highly specialized equipment.  These analyses  are
    not highly intensive in person hours/sample.  The special field investi-
    gations, however, are relatively  intensive in use of personnel time.   Both
    types of assistance are limited on a priority basis.  By providing  the
    assistance, the general program objective of minimizing unnecessary radiation
    exposure is furthered by allowing State solution to problems.  As a service,
    repository   is also provided for  disposal of radium sources.  The PFT's in
    this case represent person years  of effort.  A larger actual number of people
    are involved on a partial  basis.

         The Level 1 resources accomplish the following:  provides analytical
    laboratory services to meet approximately 30% of the specialized  requests
    received from States and Regions; provides limited support for the  investi-
    gation of unplanned environmental radiation events of interest to the
    national radiological control effort; assists States with emergency response
    planning; provides for headquarters support and coordination;  develops
    a basic public awareness activity within ORP; maintains the repository for
    radium.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         The States could be provided with guidance and technical  advice but
    left without any Federal assistance in monitoring or radionuclide analysis.
    This could cause certain hardships for States since some radionuclide
    analyses are so specialized and do not occur frequently enough for  States
    to develop and maintain such expertise.  Also, it is necessary for  EPA to
    assure the acquisition of  adequate State data to complete its  assessment  of
    the national radiological  quality of the environment.  The States might
    refuse to provide voluntary assistance in the operation of ERAMS.  This
    would lead to a substantial reduction in the network or its continuation  at
     a considerable increase in cost.
                                                                    J3U
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
FORM  2l  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE
F22Q  STATE PROGRAM  SUPPORT  -RAD
                HQ
       MEDIA:  RAD
       APPRO!  A & C
8, RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
02 OF  Ob            FT£
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.
      13.0          10.0
     406.0
 11.5
409.7
        FY 80  INCR
                1.0
61.4
        FY  80 CUM
  9.5
368.7
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
     Description and Benefits

          This  level raises the  level of support to States and Regions for
     investigating radiation events of specific national interest.   It also
     provides analytical support for  about 45% of State and Regional requests.
     A minimal  level of assistance to States and Regions in identifying and
     scoping out new radiological exposure situations will be available.

     Impact of  Not Funding This  Level

          Without this level of  support some potential problems will remain  un-
     documented.  This will be the third consecutive year in which this type of
     support will have been reduced.  This creates major obstacles to needed
     EPA/State  cooperative efforts in the radiation area.  The fostering of  this
     attitude may hinder EPA efforts  to delegate Radiation enforcement* activities
     for Clean  Air Act Regulations in future years.
              J3L
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2J DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 ™w      ^~™—••****•*•••••••*•••*• W »•• •• W •••••••••••••^•••4||
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE         HO       M£DIA|  RAD
F220  STATE  PROGRAM SUPPORT -RAO                   APPRO|  A &  C
B.

RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
FY 78 ACT FY
13.0
79 C. E.
10.0
FY 80 JNCR
1.0
LEVEL OPFT
03

OF 06 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)

406.0
11.5
409.7
5
01.0
FY 80 CUM
10,0

10.0
409,7
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Description and Benefits

        Raises the level of  support  to State and Regions to  approximately 50%
   of the requests for investigative assistance and laboratory  support.  Aids
   States and Regions  in further  identifying and scoping out new  sources of
   radiation exposure.  Enables an exhibit to be developed that depicts the EPA
   radiation control program efforts.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Without this level of support some potential problems will remain un-
   documented.  Funding at lower  levels make this the third  consecutive year in
   which this type of  support will have been reduced and may create  problems
   for efforts to delegate Radiation enforcement activities  for Clean Air Act
   Regulations in future years.
                                                                 J3U
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------















LJ
Z
o
<
>-
z a
o <
»- X
t- X
UJ CO
O U4
a: o
3
_l 0
< co
»- UJ
Z a:
UJ
z <-
o z
a s
> z
z o
UJ —
to
to —i
UJ U
< c
to —
Kl
O
U I
*- a
^4 O
z u.
~





o
<
E
Z 1
o
< o
*•* IX
° St
cr co
•ft X
<
UJ a:
toe
>-. o
c a
z a.

• UJ
a: »-
••* <
< >—
CO
<
3< s
ru
f- ru
ru u.

g
CO
0-

CD
o- «-.
— cr,
u
x
»-
«o
UJ
ru t£
cc z
o- —>
•** z
z
_J
D.
««•

CO
o
»•






UJ
r*
O ^~
tc «
O- _J
v* 2
X
,J


»-
UJ
c x
CD UJ
t> a
z




*-
O- UJ
i^
o- a
u

CO <
r- 3
0- l-
— o
^
























r- c cc 9
o r«- -c ru

,9
r» e a? 9
or- -c ru


**! *. *^ %
t~ C. CO 9
o r~- o ru
Kl ru Kl Kl


Kl 9 ^ 9
r- o co 9
or- « ru
Kl ru Kt K>






KtKlCQO O f**t^O9O 11%
r»r-cocc tf CD or. o ^ c- O
OKi»-»~ ««cru
Kt re ru K» ru ** KI






KIKIO9O O 99OOO ITI
f-r~coco o- -"~O9 —
oKir-»» «K>K\in
KI ru ru
_





r~t-otr>o vi »- 1-- o in o in
O"9«noo — 0-01000 x
so- — « — ~ o p- — « — ••
a ru — KI 9 ru — KI

OOK1O OOKIO
• ••• • • « •
^^r^K) ^^f^-Ki
ootrv<« ooiri*"
9 9 Kt 9 9 Kl






0 O
O O
O H- 0 »-
M «— U. U. M 1- U. UJ
•C^ _J^.U.O.«- -O ^ _I^U-O.»-
o < e D. c. u. c < c o. o u.
• UJC£O *i^^^ *UJQrCi ** ^
U. I 05 Z C li.I«O3O
O1-3XW— Ot-DX*» —
3O«*-"to oo^v^o?
— < I a z ru-coo o >- to c
H-ZX>>-I k-ZX^"-*
_juj~ujc »-to >c f-to
u.2 ^o uj n o o
_j or ca. _i i ca.
t- in
o- o
o «
9 Kl
>~ lt\
O- 0
O •*
9 Kl

"^ "^
o o
0 «
9 Kl


r- in
0- 0
o .e







r-r» o irt e
c> 9 in o o
oe> — •*> —
9 iy» — KI






o o o — c
— -c in « »•
9 fVI *« Kl







r-r- o to o
o -
,£ ^rf _j ^^ u.
O < O O.
• uj cr o
u. x f> r> o
o >- o x •» —
r> o « «- CB
KI « X C Z
o «- to o
»- Z X >- t-t
_J UJ — UJ « >-
1^1 (^ ^^ «^> ^J ^H
> C: »- 1C
LlJ O ^ O
_i cc c- a





-



















o
o








in









in
^.
_















^
U. UJ
a. •-
o u.













-------
o
z
UJ
o
Ul
+-
O
a:
a.
§1
LU
  UJ




  CO

  _J
  Q.

  ^

  O
  O
  o
  U
  o
  u_
c
o
•H
•LJ
C8 U
"D cfl
CO
.. C-'
< o
Q §£
ty a.
5 <







_ u
O uj
I CC








§
CN
fe
4J
0
D.
a.
3
C/3

CO
M
00
0
O-
01
cfl
4J
w

«^.
UJ
Q
O
U
Q
Z
w
K
K
i

o
w
u
UJ
O
<







1-
z
UJ
I
^0
~
Q.
O
u
u
UJ
5
D
D
0
CO
0
>.
u.






_l
U'
UJ
J

UJ
UJ
J



UJ
^
UJ
j
UJ
>
UJ
_J
N

^J
UJ
>
UJ
_J
H
_l
UJ
LU
_l
£ ->"
u. c.



UJ
CO <
t^ S
en 2
^_ H-
U. UJ

UJ
OH
*^1
U)

UJ
c^
UJ
t
K
Z
UJ
5
w
Zi
a.
O
U
o
CO
















O
m


m
•*



o
^ . ,










4J
o
a.
3
U)

rH
CO
u
•H

CO ^
C 13
CO 01
O -H
U-i
01
60 CO
Cfl *J
•U CO
c a>
o> 3 ; -I o •• '
M 0)
01 h
OH

















































05
(•^
1
O
c«
E
o
u.
a
Ul

-------

-------
                  NOISE  MEDIA



                    CONTENTS


                                         PAGE

A.   MEDIA RESOURCE  SUMMARY	      312

B.   MEDIA OVERVIEW	      313

C.   MEDIA RANKING	      319

D.   BUDGET REQUEST  BY DECISION UNIT      320

E.   DECISION UNIT  DESCRIPTIONS AND
     LEVELS  •



          ABATEMENT  AND  CONTROL	      322,

          ENFORCEMENT	      343

-------
                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                       FY 1980 OMB REQUEST

                              Noise
                     Media Resource Summary
                             FY 1979           FY 1980           Change
                                     (dollars in thousands)
Abatement & Control

Permanent Positions	    75
Budget Authority	 9,905.0
•Enforcement

Permanent Positions.
Budget Authority....
                  83               +8
              12,542.8         +2,637.8
 22               24               +2
977.9          1,076.7            +98.8
Total

Permanent Positions	    97
Budget Authority	10,882.9
                 107
              13,619.5
   +10
+2,736.6
                                                                    J31,:

-------
                         NOISE MEDIA OVERVIEW
I.    OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY

     Consistent with the policy set forth in the Noise Control Act of
1972, the overall objective of the noise program is to achieve an
environment free from noise which jeopardizes health or welfare.  In the
EPA Report to the President and Congress on Noise> noise is defined
as "any sound that may produce an undesired physiological effect in an
individual and that may interfere with the social ends of an individual
or group."

     Harmful effects from noise include the following:

        •  Permanent damage to the inner ear, resulting in hearing
           loss that ranges from mild to severe, depending upon
           the level and duration of exposure.   Other health
           effects are suspected.

        •  Interference with communication thus disrupt the
           social use of sound and the performance of a variety
           of tasks.

        •  Disturbance of sleep and inner-thought processes.
                                                              \
In addition to these proven harmful effects, there is substantial but as
yet inconclusive evidence that noise can contribute to several non-
auditory health problems, including stress-related diseases, such as
high blood pressure, heart attacks and ulcers;  as well as possible
adverse effects on fetal development, learning, and mental health.

     The total number of people with hearing loss or other health pro-
blems resulting from noise exposure is unknown, even though noise-
induced hearing loss is a well-recognized problem both in the military
and in highly mechanized industries.  An estimated 14.7 million American
workers are exposed to eight hour average sound levels (Leq (8)) above 75
decibels (dB) which pose a possible hazard to hearing.  The impact of
high occupational exposure can be added to by high environmental expo-
sure.  For example, an estimated 13.5 million Americans are exposed to
Leq (8) of 75 dB or greater as operators of or passengers in transpor-
tation or recreational vehicles.

     The EPA identified level for protection of the general population
with an adequate margin of safety against activity interference is a
"Day-Night sound level" (Ldn)  of 55 dB.  This level incorporates a
penalty of 10 dB for noise occurring during the night.  As outdoor noise
levels increase above Ldn 55 dB they are increasingly likely to inter-
fere with speech communication, sleep, relaxation,  and privacy and
result in expressions of annoyance.  An estimated 103 million Americans
are exposed to an Ldn of 55 dB or greater this is virtually half of

-------
the Nation's population.  Some residential areas have been sampled where
the Ldn was 75 dB and higher.  Thus, for people living in these areas,
the environmental noise background, without occupational or other high
exposures, is probably significant enough to induce hearing loss after
many years of exposure, in addition to the more subtle adverse health
effects probably induced by noise exposures:

     Without coordinated Federal, State, and local programs to abate and
control noise the following can be expected to occur.

         •  Urban noise levels will increase in proportion to growth in
            population density.

         •  Airports will continue to be a major source of noise even
            with the short-term improvements that will result from the
            introduction of larger numbers of quieter, wide-body jets
            and retro-fitting of noise controls on older jets.  The
            estimated number of people exposed to noise levels of Ldn 65
            dB or greater attributable to aircraft noise will remain
            essentially unchanged in the year 2000 in the absence of
            further actions.

         •  The number of residents adjacent to freeways and/or*
            highways who will be exposed to noise levels of
            Ldn 65 dB or greater will increase three to four-
            fold by the year 2000.

         •  An estimated 50 percent increase will occur in the
            number of person-hours of exposure to construction noise
            above Ldn 55 dB by the year 2000.

     To combat the existing problems associated with noise and their
tendency to increase, the Noise Control Act of 1972 allows EPA to
regulate the noise emissions from new products identified as major
sources of noise (other than aircraft).  Emission standards may also be
set for in-use equipment of interstate motor carriers and in-use equip-
ment and facilities of interstate rail carriers (i.e., on equipment
presently in use).  Noisy products and products sold to control noise
may be regulated to require labeling and thus aid consumers in product
selection.  Such labeling allows the use of marketplace pressure to
obtain quieter products.  EPA may also provide assistance to State and
local governments in developing programs aimed at achieving ambient
noise standards.

     EPA also has the responsibility to coordinate Federal noise related
research and control activities.  Furthermore, the Act allows EPA to
designate products with low noise emissions for preferential Federal
purchase, thus bringing added marketplace pressure to bear on the
development of quieter equipment.

-------
     Other than the madatory time constrained actions under the Act,
EPA's general strategy has been as follows:

        •  Place a high priority on the regulation of new products
           which tend to have wide urban impact.

        •  Shift emphasis to improving State and local capability to
           control noise as major product sources come under regulation.
           This shift is desirable because of the long turnover time
           before the quieter products replace those in use and because
           the impact of noise is often highly dependent on the in-use
           situation.  Appropriate State and local control can achieve
           benefits in the short term, assist in the maintenance of new
           product standards and obviate the need for and high cost of
           quieting the environment solely by product standards.

        •  Use marketplace pressure to quiet appropriate products both
           through labeling (thus aiding consumer choice) and through
           the designation of qualifying products for preferential
           Federal purchase.

        •  Give emphasis to cooperative efforts among Federal agencies
           to use their grant powers and policies to control noise.
           Use cooperative efforts to develop and demonstrate new
           technology and new techniques for noise control.  Such
           efforts are viewed by EPA as a particularly cost effective
           method of multiplying the impact of its limited resources
           and as an efficient use of skills between cooperating agencies.

     Consistent with this strategy, EPA is developing regulations to
provide an adequate measure of control over major noise sources.  We
have placed particular emphasis on control of noise from surface trans-
portation and construction.  FY 1979 should see the promulgation of
four noise emission regulations and the proposal of two additional
regulations.  General labeling regulations, soon to be promulgated,
will provide a basis for informed consumer choices with regard to the
noisiness of new products.  This program along with preferential Federal
purchases of quiet products through the Low Noise Emission Products
program (LNEP) should encourage the design and manufacture of quiet
products.

     The EPA noise enforcement program is responsible for Federal enforce-
ment under the Noise Control Act of 1972 of Section 6, new product noise
standards and Section 8, informational labeling requirements applicable
to new products.  The main emphasis of the program in FY 1980 will be
thie continued enforcement of the new compressors and medium and heavy
duty trucks through production verification and selective enforcement

-------
audits.  Enforcement activities will also include continued development
of enforcement strategies and regulations for other Section 6 and
Section 8 products and a minimal level of guidance and assistance to
State/local noise enforcement programs.

     Effective State and local noise control programs are essential if
the Nation is to reduce noise to levels commensurate with the protection
of public health and welfare.  Consequently, EPA conducts, as directed
by the Noise Control Act, a program of technical assistance to both
State and local governments.  This program serves as a necessary and
essential counterpart to the Federal noise regulatory development
program.

     The objective of the technical assistance program is to substantially
increase the number of communities having active programs in the various
noise program elements, such as motor vehicle control (motorcycle,
trucks, autos); stationary source control (fence line standards);
construction noise control; noise abatement planning (zoning, land use
planning); and public information.

     The Each Community Helps Others (ECHO) program uses local volunteer
noise control experts to assist other communities, with EPA paying
out-of-pocket expenses, but not salaries.  The Quiet Communities
Program (QCP) is designed to research and demonstrate the best*
available techniques for noise control in various types of communities,
and is a major mechanism in the development and delivery of technical
assistance.  The noise program elements serve as a mechanism to insure
the most effective use of ECHO and QCP.

     FY 1978 saw a renewed emphasis placed upon the coordination of
Federal noise research resulting in the publication of four interagency
noise research panel reports.  Efforts in FY 1979 will be directed
toward implementing panel's recommendations.  FY 1979 will also see
continued reliance upon interagency agreements as the most cost-
effective mechanism for EPA to stimulate noise abatement technology
development.

II.  RANKING CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES

     The basic criteria used to rank decision levels for the noise
program were:

     1.  Enforcement of regulations currently in effect;

     2.  Maintainance of a base level of effort for the development of
         new regulations;
                                                                      03
                                                                        V*.  /

-------
      3.  Continue delivery of technical assistance to State and  local
         governments;

      4.  Establishment of a base level program for research into the
         adverse health effects of noise; and

      5.  Reinforcement of the regulation development process because
         of the impact of court ordered railroad regulation revisions
         and the severe impact of FY 1979 budget cuts.

III.   1980 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

      The FY 1980 Noise Program is basically a continuation of the  1979
program thrust with  the addition of one major new initiative - a noise
health effects research effort.  Additionally, the FY 1980 regulatory
program will seek to regain part of its lost momentum as a result  of
the court-ordered railroad revisions.

IV.   REQUEST SUMMARY

                                    FY 1980 Total    Change From FY 1979
                                   PFT  BA$(000)      PFT     BA$(000)
Abatement and Control	    83  12,542.8       +8     +2,637.8
    Noise Abatement  Strategies
       and Regulations	    43   8,227.8       +8     +2,566.0

      Four emissions  regulations will be proposed and two other
promulgated for new  products previously identified as major noise
sources.  Emphasis on labeling actions initiated in FY 1978 and continued
in FY  1979 will be maintained.  Identification of major noise sources
will  focus on light  duty vehicles in FY 1980, resulting in a general
reduction of promulgations of such regulations in FY 1981 and beyond.
The present minimum  effort for developing information on new technology
to be used in the development of regulations and program strategies will
continue.  Effort will be initiated to identify the auditory and non-
auditory adverse health effects of noise.

    Noise Strategies
       Implementation	    25   3,563.8

     Headquarters participation in technical assistance to State and
local government will be maintained.  This effort will include 50  ECHO
community noise advisors and 4 QCPs.  In addition, 45 school systems
will  incorporate EPA noise curriculum into their programs.  Federal
coordination efforts will include one noise proposal to the FAA, a
general aviation airport planning project, and continue reliance
on LAGs to stimulate noise abatement activities in other agencies.
Q3*.'

-------
    Noise Program
      Implementation	         15     751.2       -       +71.8

    Regional Resources and Program efforts for the delivery of technical
assistance will remain at the FY 1979 level.   The Regions will continue
to take the lead in managing the ECHO program with a strong emphasis on
the establishment of State ECHO programs and  will provide QCP liaison.
The Regions will continue to hold workshops for State and local officials
and to carry out public information activities.

Enforcement	       24   1,076.7        +2      +98.8
     Noise Enforcement	    24   1,076.7        +2      +98.8

    FY 1980 activities will include full enforcement of medium and
heavy duty truck and portable air compressor  new product regulations,
development of enforcement strategies and regulations for additional
Section 6 and 8 products, and some assistance to State/local enforcement
programs.
                                                                      us:

-------
=     U4 C
a     z —
U

HA
-     s <
•Z     XT
u-1     ?•
o;
u.     >-
         r. 7   Q"-0
         U w _ ^"^
                    z

                    i»
                           •S  u.
                               rs
                                        **\ o *^-  o  -cr **i i"u
                                        3D ^ ^-  ..^  C f* X in
                                                             O C, O  O O O  C=  O O  O
                                                                                                                                        • rv -\j  -\j ry «n *^
                                                  •\j^«O*o^«OM-i-j-^jny-iirj-i
                                        o  c ooooooooooocoo
                                        •v ^) ^  ^ sQ ff  C' t ^
                                        is-a--^  — y  c  o •
                                        r~     fv -C  < »-  —     I
                                        oocooooo     occoocc
                                                                                                           000000000000000
                                                                                                                            X>X>X!X>tCCC£CO  —
                                                                                                           ooooooooooocooo



                                                                                                           __^_,______ — _ — rvjAa
                                                                                                                                           i  N. ru «^ ^~
                                                                                                                                           I  *U ^i -C W
                                                                                                                            oc     oeco     oo
                                                                                                               oooocooccooo-o
                                                                                                 OJ
                                                                                                 Z
                                                                                                 oJ
                                                                                                 •J
                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                            Z  Z
                                                                                                            O  C
                                                                                                           1-—ZZ
                                                                                                                               —Z
                                        Z  2.



                                        J  U  »! I;
                                        3;  a:  — >—
                                        Z  ;  « <
                                        j,  u.  ar a:
                                                  -.  z    z
                                                  -J  Uj    OJ

                                                  £  UJ 05 Jj
                                                  —  -J "-? _l
                                                                       Z  Z
                                                                       UJ  UJ
                                                                       Z  Z
                                                                  - j_j        *— uj •— fl.  uJ
                                                                   trcocozarzzz
                                                         =f
                                                      s
                                                      « cr
                                                      z —
S  uJ
<  *}
Z  Z
nujujucou<9:
— —  — a; —  za:  —
                                          I  uj CO CO  i_ tf! a.  uJ '
                                          * so  io ~s:  to co to
                                                                     I UJ  UJ Uj Jj  UJ X!  UJ
                                               X X  4t  C .C
                                        2  Z  — •-        Z  —

                                        Z  Z  '	        Z  —

                                        _J  J UJ UJ        _1  uJ


                                        —  —  _i_J        —  _j is ;»
                                               a. a.  »— •—     a.ujuj  —

                                        UJOJ^^'^UJUJUJ^^        Uj
                                        —  —         si"     ««oei

                                        uuj««uuuj-zt-— r
a z
   UJ
rt Z

 05
                                                                                                                                                       CO  CO
                                                                                                                                                       U-  UJ
                                         30000000000000-00
                                        2322—3 —  3322332—2
                                        inrrzxixxrrirxii
                                                                                                           OOOOOOOoCOOOOOO
                                             1  J"1 -P  O J^ *5


                                             I  X M  -VJ "V ">j
                                        oooooooooooooooo
                                                                                                                         00 —  — OOOOO—  —

                                                                                                                         j^j-jij:rjj'jj
                                                                                                           —  _ — (X'V-MX'XJ'Vru'V.'M'V'"-^
                                                                                                           ooooooooooooooo

-------
*-*
o
o
o
"^
Ct O- •"»
* £a
tx i-> x i o
U- <-> CD X.
2 O- UJ
U-
_
a
UJ

y-.
O
o
c
>— *-*
0>
UJ •«
c
O UJ
^* sc tr *—
^ — !- t-
>- UJ X.
LJ (3 U'
Z O H-
UJ ^ lei-
tr cc
*—
o •- a.
M •-> •X
O •- Z) t-
UJ CO U.
»- UJ 2
0 =1 O
a o >-> •—
cc *- o
_l l_| C.
*— UJ O »—
2 15 « •»
ui o >- z
Z 3 CD *-"
2 CC »—
Of- CO
CC CC CO O UJ
> o 3 ^ c^ ^— o
2 C -- — 2 >-
LL-- 0 UJ UJ -»
ff> CC CC UJ
co v tr t-
*•• UJ O
t- u. c »-
Z£ Q.
O •v
U- UJ
*-i U,



















UJ
J
1—
**
u> t-
— 3
0 0
2 UJ
o
o
U

00 CC SO
• • • •
•£ * *4 •«
« -t »- f-
tn in
ru ru

Kl Kl K. K, M nj
« -O 39 99
*" «»M
O 0
nj ru
cc cc ru rv cc cc
r- >- _ _ KI KI
AJ i\j m m <* •*
CM ivi r^ r- in «n
« ^ ^ »
CC CC Kt Kl



Kl Kl — — « - * •*>
* » * » "L
in m KI KI





o o co co a a
o- o r- ^ * -c
99 *\I *V 99



CO O O O O
o- cr m in in in
KI KI — — nj nt

2
o
2 •-
O •<
»- 2
< Uj
•- Z
UJ J
z a
CO UJ Z
c; _j "->
uj a.
CC Z CO
•-> UJ
•^ f^
z a
CO CO < UJ CO
t- cc a: »- tt
< uj u * uj
cc »- o o: *-
»- O: cc »- a
CO < CL CO CO <
323
UJ 3 _! UJ O _l UJ C _J
COO •< CO»-i << COO <
ouj c: ouj o Ouj o
21 I- 2- 21 l-

ino 3 o>- 3 me 3
ox o *^tt o ••* ~ o
AJ ru AJ
C5 (9 (5
CD CC CC CC
• • • •
»^ cc cc cc
Kl O- O O
•o
ni

K, O- IT- O
9 O C- o
IM — — —
c ceo
IV, - - _
cc f- r^ r-
ru * •* 4}
9 ^- f— 1*-
in o o o
« » * »
rv — — —



o cc cc cc
CC -C -D O
9 Kl Kl Kl
vrt



o e o c
— 999*
cc ru rv rv




o o o o
m »«. r^ »^
o i- r~ ^-
e^ o- o
o-
~




ru o- o- t>
KI in in in
r\i ru nj nj
^M


e o o o
9- Kl Kl Kl
?•* r\t rvt rv











^-
2
UJ
z
UJ
U CO
cc cc
O UJ
U. >-
•z. cc
_J UJ •< _l

>- UJ 3 _l t-
o co o < o
O U O
2 2 I >- 2
CC CC
CL in o 3 n.
o. o x o a

cs
                                              I
                                             Kl

                                              I
                                             a
                                             c
in
 •
o-
A
 •


CO
rw
CO
cc
                        n 7 ••> ">
                        U-j • ^-

-------
»•* ^
C 4
O
0
V
a. <>• •»
1C LJ 1-
UJ O-
z ^* o —
a o •v i >-
U. O CO 0.
zoo
!-• v«

u.
CL
'

o
o
l~ O
07 ^
lu
c
«~> O UJ
u cc a:
*"-_
U U-
>• o a.
U 3 O
Z Z.
UJ
s
Z U-
o t- a.
t- 2
o r> o
JL U) CO O
a •- o
_1 O 0
^ 1— UJ UJ ^
1- UJ C i—
z o < «
UJ O V 3L
r 3  O Z> Z O t- U.
2 O •- — 2 0.
UJ O UJ UJ O
co a; tr
co o- a:
Si "" UJ CJ
i— u. o t—

C Q.
C
Z
— ^
^%
c
0
_j e
cc « •*
« tr t- K
<
*-
O-














UJ
— '
,_
UJ f
_ —
r\ ** ' , ^ O O
i ' ' J. Z U.~
O
O
LJ

I 0
k •
•c
^
in
ru



o
n

0
ec*

00
^
ru
ru
^
cc



o
o
w



o
Kl
f

CC
^
^
-0
1*
in





0
^




o
in



o
o
<£>
f>
it.
*


0
^
«»•



CO
UJ
cr

•c

CO CO
t- a:
« UJ
Ct 1—
>— ^
» «
Hi Q
CO O
C UJ
2 I

in c
0 I
ru
u
0
B
.c
^
in
ru



o
^

0






0
in
*•



0
m
ru


o
_
Kl
«^
^
ru

2
O 0
»- m
f ru
2
UJ
UJ
_l
§

CO
UJ
»^
C2
Ut CO
t— o:
< UJ
a: •-
t- a:
to <
UJ O
co o
C UJ
2 X

IT O
— I
ru
C5









o
o




CC
r\
•o
in
^
Kl



O
in
ru



o
in
ru

CO
Kl
^
in
^
Kl





O
in
••*



o
in
ru


o
,.
Kl
••
^
ru


e
in
ru
^














_,
<
0
*—

^
D


CO
•
r-
Kl
•C
ru



o
•a

0
CO

cc
ru
or
m
^
ru



o
^
a



0
Kl
CO

c
in
o
o-

ru

,_
4>
t^
o
Cct
•"



o
P.




o
a
ru

o-
)»
1—
cr







o
ru




o
ru
ru


O
o
c?
o
^
—


o
9
ru















_i
<
O
h>

^
c


CD
V
CC
O





o
r-

C
(M

r-
•f
f~
o
^
-«



o
o-*




c
a
ru

»
^
r-
O







o
ru




c
ru
ru


o
o
0
c
^
•"


e
^*
ru














-J
"£.
o

2
Cr
O.
O.
<

^
•
•e
Kl
**•
ru



0
Kl
ru
o
o

m
o
••*
^
^
Kl



e
f
in



0
r~
&

o-
ru
cc
cc
«
o
*•




o
Kl
K\



C
pj
o


o
e
o
in
^
o


o
Kl
O















^
>"
°

*£
»^l
^
Ul


-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

  RM  21 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HO       M£DIA» NOISE
G205  NOISE  STRATS  & REGS                           APPKOt A &  C

B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY  80 INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          «3.o         35.0          29,0         2?.o
 LEVEL              OPFT           8.0          7,0           6»0          6.0
01  OF 08             FTE                       49,0          aO,6         40.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.03     6,360.0      5,661.8       a,296,4      4,296.4
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description  and Benefits

         This level of resources will provide for the promulgation of two noise
    emission regulations (pavement  breaker and rock drills, and lawn mowers) and
    one labeling regulation (vacuum cleaners).  It will also allow for the
    continuation of preregulatory studies  through contracts, etc., on industrial
    machinery (focusing on fabricated metal products industries).  Studies on
    the cardiovascular effects of noise will be continued.  Some  follow-up
    work  to the  railroad regulation in  the area of impulse noise  will also be
    provided.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

          Failure to fund this level would  result in halting development of all
    Federal noise standards and regulations.  The absence of Federal noise regu-
    lations will mean that millions of Americans will be subjected to unhealthy
    and unwanted noise for which no other  cost-effective means is available for
    its abatement.
             J31
  EPA Form 2410-1I (8-78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  NOISE STRATEGIES AND REGULATIONS (G205)
HO. OANR

REG.
MEDIA:Noise

APPRO: .A&C
  Bl  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

       The objective of this decision unit is to develop and promulgate
  emission and labeling regulations that will reduce harmful noise emissions
  from new products.  These regulations are developed through in-house and
  contractual efforts involving:  the gathering and analysis of data on noise
  and its health effects to determine exposure criteria and levels of noise
  reduction required for abatement options and for specific regulatory actions;
  evaluation of private and public sector technology development to determine
  best available technology; and assessment of economic, environmental and
  health data to ascertain the costs and benefits of regulation.  This
  decision unit also includes development and implementation of a noise
  health and welfare effects research program.

  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Major accomplishments for FY 78 include:  proposal of a noise regula-
  tion for motorcycles and the holding of public hearings on proposed
  regulations for buses and motorcycles.  In addition, work was carried out
  which will lead to future promulgation of emission regulations for railroad
  facilities, buses, wheeled and crawler tractors, lawnmowers,  and pavement
  breakers and rock drills and to revision of interstate motor carrier
  regulations.  Development of labeling regulations for lawnmowers was
  continued and preregulation studies were conducted on industrial machinery,
  medium and heavy trucks,  light duty vehicles, motor boats, air conditioners,
  chain saws, snowmobiles,  electrical and electronic equipment, surface
  transportation labeling and earth moving equipment.  Other activities in
  FY 78 included continuation of a study on the cardiovascular effects of
  noise.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       The FY 79 program will provide for the promulgation of emission regula-
  tions for motorcycles,  buses,  solid waste compactors and wheeled and crawler
  tractors.  It will also provide for the proposal of emission regulations
  controlling pavement breakers, rock drills, and lawnmowers.  Other regula-
  tions activities will include both the proposal and promulgation of court-
  ordered revision of the railroad regulation, the promulgation of general
  provision for labeling and specific requirements for hearing protectors.
  Labeling requirements for vacuum cleaners will be proposed.  Preregulatory
  studies will be continued, but at a reduced level over FY 78.  The study
  of the cardiovascular effects of noise will continue.
                                                                     J3L
EPA Form 2410-10 (8>78)

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  NOISE STRATEGIES AND REGULATIONS (G205)
HQ OANR

REG.
MEDIA:Noise
APPRO: .A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES

       The objective of this decision unit is to develop and promulgate
  emission and labeling regulations that will reduce harmful noise emissions
  from new products.  These regulations are developed through in-house and
  contractual efforts involving:  the gathering and analysis of data on noise
  and its health effects to determine exposure criteria and levels of noise
  reduction required for abatement options and for specific regulatory actions;
  evaluation of private and public sector technology development to determine
  best available technology; and assessment of economic, environmental and
  health data to ascertain the costs and benefits of regulation.  This
  decision unit also includes development and implementation of a noise
  health and welfare effects research program.

  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Major accomplishments for FY 78 include:  proposal of a noise regula-
  tion for motorcycles and the holding of public hearings on proposed
  regulations for buses and motorcycles.  In addition, work was carried out
  which will lead to future promulgation of emission regulations for railroad
  facilities, buses, wheeled and crawler tractors, lawnmowers, and pavement
  breakers and rock drills and to revision of interstate motor carrier
  regulations.  Development of labeling regulations for lawnmowers was
  continued and preregulation studies were conducted on industrial machinery,
  medium and heavy trucks, light duty vehicles, motor boats, air conditioners,
  chain saws, snowmobiles, electrical and electronic equipment, surface
  transportation labeling and earth moving equipment.  Other activities in
  FY 78 included continuation of a study on the cardiovascular effects of
  noise.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       The FY 79 program will provide for the promulgation of emission regula-
  tions for motorcycles, buses, solid waste compactors and wheeled and crawler
  tractors.  It will also provide for the proposal of emission regulations
  controlling pavement breakers, rock drills, and lawnmowers.  Other regula-
  tions activities will include both the proposal and promulgation of court-
  ordered revision of the railroad regulation, the promulgation of general
  provision for labeling and specific requirements for hearing protectors.
  Labeling requirements for vacuum cleaners will be proposed.  Preregulatory
  studies will be continued, but at a reduced level over FY 78.  The study
  of the cardiovascular effects of noise will continue.
                                                                     J3L.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE          HQ       M£DIA»  NOISE
6205  NOISE  STRATS  &  REGS                           APPRO:  A 1  C

3. RESOURCE  SUMMARY        FY 78 ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY  80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         43.0         35,0          29.0         29.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          8.0          7.0           6,0          6.0
01 OF 08             FTE                       49.0          40,6         40.6
   BUDGET  AUTH, (000.0)     6,360.0      5,661.8       4,296,4     4,296.4
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description  and Benefits

         This level of resources will provide for the  promulgation of two noise
    emission regulations (pavement breaker and rock drills, and lawn mowers)  and
    one labeling regulation (vacuum  cleaners) .  It will  also allow for the
    continuation of preregulatory studies through contracts, etc.,  on industrial
    machinery (focusing on fabricated metal products industries).  Studies on
    the cardiovascular effects of noise will be continued.  Some follow-up
    work to the  railroad regulation  in  the area of impulse noise will also be
    provided.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         Failure to fund this level would result in halting development of all
    Federal noise standards and regulations.   The absence of Federal noise regu-
    lations will mean that millions of Americans will  be subjected to unhealthy
    and unwanted noise for which no other cost-effective means is available for
    its abatement.
             J3i
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

      2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ       M£DIA|  NOISE
G205  NOISE STRATS  & REGS                           APPROi  4  I C
B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         43.0         35.0           3.0         32,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          8,0          7.0           1.0          7.0
02  OF  08             FTE                  ,     49.0           2.9         03, 5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     6,360.0      5,661.8        799.2      5,095.6
  I
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and  Benefits

         The funding of this level will result in the promulgation of interstate
    motor carrier  regulation revisions  and  the proposal of  one additional new
    product emission regulation for light duty vehicles.

    Impact of Not  Funding This Level

         The development of Federal noise regulations is a  three to four year
    process which  requires that the economic and technological bases for regula-
    tions be as complete and current as possible.  Any major interruption of  this
    process which  extends the time between  the development  of the data base and
    the proposal of  the regulation leads to invalidate much of the economic and
    technological  studies used for regulations development.  Not funding this
    level would represent such an interruption for the regulations involved and
    would result in  halting much of the development effort  carried out in
    previous years.
                                                                  J31,
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE
G205  NOISE STRATS &  REGS
                HQ       M£DIA»  NOISE
                         APPROi  A & C
B. RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL             OPFT
03 OF  os            FTE
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78  ACT FY  79 C. E,
     «3.0         35.0
       6.0          7,0
                   U9.0
  6,360.0      5,661,8
FY  80 INCR
        3.0

        1.5
      566,0
FY 80  CUM
      35,0
       7,0
      «5,,0
  5,661,,6
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and Benefits

        Funding of this level will result in the proposal of an additional new
    product regulation in  the area of surface transportation  (tires) and the
    continuation of work leading to the FY 81 proposal of more stringent
    standards for medium and heavy duty trucks.  The funding of these activities
    will result in EPA having initiated regulatory action upon all major surface
    transportation noise sources.

    Impact of Not Funding  This Level

        Failure to fund this level will have consequences similar to those of
    previous levels, in that significant amounts of the work leading to regula-
    tory proposal would be lost.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2$  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE
G205  NOISE  STRATS  &  REGS
                HQ
      t  NOISE
APPROf  A & C
B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
04 OF  os            PTE
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)
FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.
      as.o         35.0
       8.0           7.0
                   49.0
  6/360,0      5*661.8
 FY  80  INCR
         0,0
         1.0
         5.4
       566,2
FY 80  CUM
      39,0
       8-.0
      50,a
  6,237,8
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description  and  Benefits

         Funding of  this level will  provide for the proposal of emission regula-
    tions for chain  saws, the proposal of revisions for  portable air compressors
    (accoustical assurance period) and the proposal of labeling regulations  for
    mufflers.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         All of  the  regulatory activities of this level  were originally planned
    for FY 78 and FY 79, but were forced to be postponed by the court-ordered
    revision of  the  railroad emission regulations.   Work upon railroads will
    continue in  FY 79.  Efforts have been made to maintain the validity of
    studies which support these regulatory actions.  However, it would  not be
    practical to further extend contract efforts and maintain data baees if
    proposal is  postponed beyond FY  80.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  ASENCY

FORM  2» DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ        MgDIAt  NOISE
6205  NOISE  STRATS & REGS                           APPROi  A &  C
' WW * • V •* • 'W ^9 • • • • • • W ••• • • M • • • • w MM • ^ M B M M ^ ^^ ^^ M W^*^B M^M     ^ • ^
8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT  FY 79 C. E.   FY SO  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          aj.o          ss.o           a.o         03,0
 LEVEL              OPFT           8.0           7.0           2.0         10.0
06  OF 08             FTE                        09.0           a. 9         55,3
    BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)     6,360.0      5,661.8      2,000.0     8,227.8
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND  THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and Benefits

        Funding of this level will  initiate a noise health effects research
    program designed  to generate criteria for the development of regulations and
    to  provide overall support for State and local  programs.  At this  level,
    health effects studies  and research investigations will be initiated to
    generate dose/response  criteria  primarily in the area of nonauditory
    effects.   This program  would represent the first attempt at systematically
    identifying and characterizing the broad spectrum of  detrimental health
    effects generated by noise.  The results of this effort will serve as basic
    guidance in the establishment of future program priorities for all Federal,
    State and  local noise abatement  activities.   It is expected that the two
    million dollars called  for in this level will stimulate the investment of an
    additional $500,000 by  other agencies in this health  effects area.
                                                                   *
    Impact of  Not  Funding This Level

        Not funding  this level will mean that any  significant strengthening or
    revision of noise health effects criteria will  not be possible.  These
    revisions  are  vitally needed, for it is generally felt by experts  in
    accoustical health that, many of  the health impacts of noise are not recog-
    nized by EPA's current  exposure  criteria.  These criteria serve as both the
    basis of EPA's regulatory and standards setting action, as well as a basis
    for the establishment of  overall program priorities  in all program areas.
    Likewise,  other agencies  use EPA noise criteria and  background documents in
    determining their noise abatement program activities.   For these reasons,  it
    becomes critical  that a noise health effects research program be initiated
    at  this time.
             J3L /
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



















o
{^

>_
2 a
0 «t
i-i Z
•- z
(J 2
UJ CO
O UJ
a u
a. a
_i 5
* CO
*— UJ
•Z. CE
UJ
Z H-
O 2
or n
> 2
2 C
CO

UJ O
« c
CO —
c
u. Z
>— C£
« CD
2 u.
D







•z.
O
< CO
>- li
o ID
« c:
a:
•e
Of
CO
UJ »—
CO «J

c >-
z «o

• uJ
^ «D
Mt l-H
« C

^
< in
e
r- rj





9
cc
0


KI
CO

— CO
UJ
z
1-
co
UJ
CC 2
O- •-•

2
<
CL

CC
e-






Ul
o •—
CC 1
0- _J
r



2
UJ
c x
or uj
o- cc
•z



CO
C- UJ

o- t
— 5
u

CC <
c- t-





























r-

•c o
0- CC
rg in
a —

»c cs*
c- cc
oj m
3T —•


9 ^
• •
•o c-
ff- 
* — a o- O- « o
o* »- ru ec ru a
ru o ru in
a •— KI ~*



a cc ^ ^* o o ^
^ ^ a o* &* "C o
o- ^ rucc ru a
rv o ru in
a — KI —



ec •£/ ru o- o o e>
— KI o: o" in f- o^
- b. UJ
CO ^* _> ^^ U, Q. t—
c < c c. o u.
• uj or o ^ *-*
u. I co Z" e>
o •- ~ E « —
3 C « >- CO
— < I or 2
O >- CO O
1- 2 X >- i-c
_! U.I — UJ < •-
IL! -3 — *^ _l -*
> C »- CO
u, z. ~ &
_J EC CO.


•c a

IT IT
o- cc
c cc
in —
•c a
M> m*
O- ec
0 CC
in — •


•e a
m m
o- ec
0 CC
in —

•o a
in in
o- cc
O CO
in — •




-o *- o- a e> o in
in in Q- m ru *•- KI
o o cc cc KI a
o ru to cc
in «- KI —



ru c- KI r> o o o-
o> K» in tn KI *^ ru
o- KI -c cr
r- -« -c ru




co ^ f\i cr o o o
~KI cc a in r» o-
* ru K> o^ KI a
«C KI KI O
in — a ru

o o o ru o o
o ru co KI K» cc
•c — a in a
KI e KI KI
* m -• ru







o
o
o *-
«* *- U. UJ
to •- _i r* u. a t-
c < o o. o u.
• uj o: o -^ »-•
U. I CO Z S5
tT1 *^ 3 Z ^" ••
CJ O « *^ SO
ru < x a z
0 >- «O O
1- 2 X >- *-t
_1 UJ •- UJ < t-

>• c >- co
UJ ~ DO
_> a. c a


-c c

— a
<£ O-
•O 0
m ru
-0 CC
— a"
 o o o
— o- ru a in •- in
•a KS ru o- KI a
•O K> K* C
» ^ * ^
in — a ru



o ^ KI a o in
•O KI fXJ c^ KI — *
-O KI KI C
in •" a ru




co o ru o o e o
*- K> cc a in ^- o
 CO KI KI CO
•c — a in a
KI O Kt Kl
•c m •- ru







o
c
o >-
« •- U- UJ
co «-» -i ~ b. CL f-
e> < o o. c- u.
• UJ C. 0 « v
b. I to — o
=> *- s r >f> —
Z> O « »^ CO
KI •« i tr 2
C H- CO O
*- 2 X >- *-<
_ ) UJ -^ UJ < ^~
UJ C^ »•* ^* _J i— »
> C •- 10
uj r r o
j .

o o o ru o o
o ru co KI KI co
-c »- a in a
Kl C Kl Kl
•f> in — ru







o
o
o t-
w »— b. UJ
CD »- _J ^ U. 0. ^~
o < e o- c< u.
• UJ CC O ^^ w
u. I to z:' e
o >- — z «* ••
2> O < *^ CO
a < z £r 2
C t- CO C
t— 2 x >- **t
_1UJ •— tLj < •-
uj ts »- ^. _j ~
> C t- CO
uj 2> so
_i cr o ci.


CC K.

K a
ru a
rv o
ec
CC Kl
r- a
ru a
ru c
CC Kl


CC Kl
t- a
ru a
ru c
» ^
ec KI

ec KI
r- a
ru a
nj o
® ^




CO Kl in K C
f~ KI a a f^
ru ru o a a
re -e -D c
a - *«



& o o o o
es o o o a
o tn in a
o — eo •—
ru —



cc * ru o o
-« KI cc a v-
ff ru Kl O Kl
^ KI KI e
in — a ru

o o o ru o
c- ru co KI K)
•o — a in a
« e KIKI
•ft in — ru







o
c
c
Ifr ^~
CO — -}~ IL.
C < 0 O.
• uj a. o
U. I 10 3 0
O >- 3 X <» —
— C * ** a>
•C ^ X C£ 2
e >- co c
>- 2 x >- «
_1 UJ *- UJ ^ >-
Uj tS ^^ *"* _J •-!
> C. >- «0
UJ = 21 0
_j c c a
CO
1
Kl
1
£>•
C








































































03_3

-------
Z
c
z  1-1
c  ^
>  r
z  c.
    CO

1C  •-
«  c.

CO  ••
o
U.  1
       Z
       o
       u, <
       -< c:
       o i-
                 ni  cr
                 ct>  Z
                 — Z
                     z
o r
& uj
o- a
                 o-  a
                 —  a:
                               O IT
                               — IT.
                               e c
                                •  •
                               f- cr
                               o
                                •
                               cc
             b.  U.'
          CC O.  •-
          o o  u.

          b.
          o

          c
          c

-------
U
2
LU
O
UJ
H-
o
£C
a.
2  >
UJ  o;



II
ED
>  °°
2  w
UJK

    UJ
    U
    o
    g

    CO

    o
    UJ
    cc
    O
    LL


a) u
CO
•H <
>g
U. Q.

UJ
H
£r ^
2 I
> U)
U. UJ

LU
CC
CO
^
LU
2
c5
LU
_l
_
^.
r-
z
UJ
X
co

O.
O
U
U

CQ






CO -3" rH O CN




fO CN rH O rH



1
fl ,
&o cd a oc eg a w
01 CO CU CO O
Bi -H M Oi -H W 4-1
&4 &4 EZ-I P-l CCj
C OC rH
0 C 3
•H O O -H O O OC
CO rH CU
CO 0) M
•H J2 01
H cd LJ
w rJ rxi





t











J3. j





















































CO
*-^
CH
^
o
E
o
U.
a.
UJ

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  NOISE PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION  (G210)
HO.

REG.
MEDIA:  Noise

APPRO:  A&C
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       This Decision Unit provides for Regional consultation assistance to
  develop State and local capabilities in managing noise abatement programs
  and on specific noise abatement problems.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
       Major activities for FY 78 included regional participation in the
  initiation of three major programs:  Each Community Helps Others (ECHO),
  Quiet Communities Program (QCP) and State Assignees.  Other activities
  carried out by this decision unit included:  the review of environmental
  impact statements, the holding of noise abatement workshops for State
  and local officials, the providing of direct technical assistance to
  local communities and public education on noise abatement and control.
  This decision unit also provided regional review of Federal facilities,
  to assure compliance with noise regulations, and regional support to
  headquarters for the development of railroad regulations.
  D)  F Y 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
       FY 79 will see a continuation of all FY 78 activities with an expansion
  of  the ECHO program from 30 to 50 community noise advisors.  In FY 79,
  regions and states will take the lead role in managing the ECHO program.
  QCPs will be carried out in three regions.
         03;.-
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2! DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE
G?10  NOISE PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION
                RG
MEDIA:  NOISE
APPROj  A &  C
B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
01 OF  06            FTE
   BUDGET AUTH, (000,0)
FY  78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.
      U.O          15.0
       6.0           9.0
                    27.8
  1*009.0        679.a
 FY  80  INCR
        11.0
        10.0
        27.3
       613.8
FY 80  CUM
      11,0
      10,0
      27.3
    613,8
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
   Description and Benefits

        This level of resources will provide a base program  (one position)  in
   nine of the ten regions.  It will also allow continuation of one of two
   QCPs started  in FY 79.  Some limited follow-up activities  to the Allentown QCP
   (terminating  1979) may be required  in FY 80.   Activities  covered within  the
   base program  will include:  direct  noise technical assistance to State and
   local officials; oversight of ECHO  activities within the  regions;  and
   involvement in regional noise education and consumer information activities.

   Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Failure  to fund this level would mean the elimination  of all regional
   noise programs.   It would also eliminate all QCP activities and reduce the
   ECHO program only those efforts that could be managed from headquarters.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2i  DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND CODE          RG       M£DIAj  NOISE
G210  NOISE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION                APPffOj  A & C

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT F'Y  79 C. E.   FY 80  INCH •   FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         11.0         15.0           3.0          ia.o
 LEVEL              OPFT          6.0          9.0  '         1,0          11.0
02 OF  06            FTE                      27.9           2,
   EPA Form 2410-1 T(8.78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

.FORM  2i DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE
5210  NOISE PROGRAM  IMPLEMENTATION
                RG
     Ai  NOISE
APPRO|  A & C
B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
03  OF  06            FTE
    BUDGET  AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78  ACT FY  79 C. E.
      11.0         15.0
       6.0          9.0
                   27.8
  1,009.0        679.4
 FY 80
         1.0
         1.0

        2s|o
FY 80  CUM
      1,5,0
      12.0
      32,1
     751.2
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and  Benefits

        This level  of  funding will provide regional support for one additional
    QCP.  This will  bring the total number of FY 80 QCPs to four (two  started
    in FY 79 and two in FY 80).

    Impact of Not  Funding This Level

        Failure to  fund this level will mean a 50% cutback in new QCPs planned
    by FY 80.  The absence of this fourth QCP will mean not only a significant
    delay in the opportunity to develop noise abatement planning techniques,
    but will also  reduce by one the regions that have a working demonstration of
    the benefits that come from community-based noise abatement activities.
                                                                J3C
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------















V
2
UJ
<
>-
2 tt
0 •<
*- Z
»- r
u o
tti w
C UJ
a LJ
zs
-i C
< 1C
^- Uj
2 o:
UJ
2 >-•
C 2
a -
>• 2
Z O
UJ •—
tn
v> +*
UJ <-)
>— bU
•< C
co —
K»
U- =L
*- d
z u.
3)



O
^»
«
h-
2
UJ
UJ
a
3:
^
^g
o:
C5
O
tt
a.

to w
2 to
0 «
1-1 C
O Z
UJ
03:5*2
t- ru
cc U

-j
cc
o-

c
o- ~
*M CO
U.'
z
>-
bJ
C 2
O" •— i
_ —
2
Q.

CD

o- *-
« u




















cc *c fw cc
f'l ^ f^ ^
— Kt r\i a
•i F*> f** >^\
CD -49 fV CD
t^ f^ ^ f^
— KI ru o*
-C ft f^ ^1

cc * nj ec
f^ r^ K! r-
— KI ru cr
«C K» ^- Kl


ec ^ ru cc
fi f*1 P^ ^"^
*• PO fU t^
^ **\ r— **i







cc«->r^^oo»o ruruoccooru
r^ovt^v-OF*- KiWCJ»'P*-^»"O
-^ ^ (v M — •• • ru fwa-ruoi^'-»r^
«c in KI r* * KI
~





co -• r- * e o ~i a-^ruooo-
f^ c f r* •• c ^« ^ c tf\ o f^ ^ ru
••* ^ fU f** ^ •• fU O C ifi
-^ Ifl **> ** **





3-w r^-oocc »^ r-oocc
9-0 K\mor«- o^o Ktmo^o-
*— f*- ^»v4 ru »^- f1* f*- •-• ru
•£ <£ Kl -C ^C KV

O O O O O O O O O O O O
r^ r'l iC if> *^ ^ O~ f^  — e r*~ KI ir> «—
o^rinin c?inm
-



^^ ^K
o o
c o
O H- O H-
t* >-U.UJ « »-U.UJ
•O*-- _1^U.D_»- ^^ _I*^U,CL^
c ta* *-/
u.itorc u-icrnc
c*-z3r^-» c'-nr^ —
^•o^^-co so<^-'tn
— -i-« ^- 2 x >- i— i
_JUJ*-UJ-
>C H-CO >C H- «C
UJ^ — C UJ— 3C
_i a o a —ix c a
ru ru
^ ^
|Tl "-»
r- w
ru fv
^ PO
m -^-
" a

ru ru
— ro
in —
f>« Q


ru ru
-•" m
in —
r^ a







ru AJ o ru o o —
». ru t> »o in ru «\)
in ru ru — — — KI
r- t~ a






o o a o o o
ec ec in — — < —
ru ru —






a a »- o o co
cy e- f> «n - _i ^ u. a. •-
C < O 0. O U,
• uJ 0: o ^ ^^
U. I CO S C
3 >- 3 Z » —
zi c « ^» en
-^ < I z 2
O »- CO O
«- 2 x >- «
_1 UJ — U- •» »-
UJ (J ^w. _| «
> O >- CO
UJ D ^ O
_i cc on

-------
u
z
UJ
a
u
UJ
H
o
CC
Q.
_1
<
h-
z  >
LU  c
s  <
z
LU
    O
    O
    o
    Z
    g
    CO

    o
    UJ
    CC
    O
    u_

0) 0
en
_J ,!M
*n <<
o
Z 
<
-J


o
CO
o
fB
>
LL





O)
pS»
_i
LU
LU
^


_l
LU
>
LU
_l

1
1
^J
LU
>
LU
I
_J
LU
UJ
-1
H
«j
Ul
>
LU
_i
H
_i
LU
LU
_l


2^
^ o
> tr
LL 0.


LU
^_
CO 5
f» 5
en 5
f" ^™
•> fe
^ GO
LL LU






LU
MEASUR
°9
LU
^
h-
^

t-
Z
UJ
COMPLISHM
O
<
m















oo \o r^
-3" C^ rt



O OO vO
•3- OO iH
O^ -^ cN
CN 00 iH
%



O VO !-.
fl o\ i-H





ro vo vo
i— 1 O\ CM




CO
l-l S
0 efl
CO M CO
•H 60 01 60
> 0 1-t rH C
•n M 4-i m 1-1
< P- -H C C
iH O i-l
0) O « -H eo
co as y 60 vi
•H U o 0) H
0 U J K
Z H
aj -o x cs
>^ 4= C ,43 y
jj 4J a o
•H -O J
c i-i w o) >^
30) 01 4J 01
g *a 4-1 co 4-1
EC cd 1-1 03
O D 4-1 CO 4-1
O CO CO W
•a <
iw Oi u-i i— i lu co
O C O X CD O (X
•H rH C O
>J c8 !-i 4.) fi Li js
0) 4J 0) y O 0) CO
,nsj2(4>tt>.n.*! , ,O-
B -H S ^ 1-1 B ^ J.V%
3t03iHCU3O s^wi.
Z S Z O PH Z 3























































CO
fv
CO
CN
0
T
CM
E
5
LU
<
a.
LU

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
 NOISE  STRATEGY  IMPLEMENTATION  (G215)
                                                    HQ   QANR   MEDIA:  NOISE

                                                    REG.         APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       Activities funded by this Decision Unit include; the delivery of
  technical assistance to generate and strenghthen State and local noise
  control programs; the development and implementation of public information
  and education programs on noise and the need for noise abatement; and
  the coordination of all Federal efforts directed at noise abatement and
  control.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
        Major accomplishments for FY 78 included the initiation of the Quiet
  Communities Program  (QCP), the Each Community Helps Others program (ECHO)
  and a State Assignees program.  Through these programs EPA greatly enhanced
  its capability to develop and deliver technical assistance for noise abate-
  ment  to State and local communities.  Other activities included the
  continuation-of three interagency agreements and the initiation of six new
  interagency agreements for the development and demonstration of noise abate-
  ment  technology.  These projects included work on vehicle inspection, off-
  road  vehicles, highway noise mitigation, bus transit malls, general
  construction sites, highway construction sites, shipyards, power plants and
  improved building construction design.  These decision units also supported
  the development of materials for public education of noise abatement and
  contxol,^ and.supported airport noise abatement planning programs in five
  communities.

  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

        The FY 79 program calls for an expansion of ECHO from 30 to 50 community
  noise advisors, and  the addition of two  cities  to  the QCP program.   In  FY
  79, EPA noise technical assistance to State and local communities will be
  targeted to generate local noise programs which address areas of need such
  as motor vehicle control, stationary source control, planning, and public
  information.  Other activities will include: four IAG noise abatement
  demonstrations, the  rewriting of an aviation noise proposal to the FAA and
  five  follow-ups to FAA aircraft noise abatement actions.  FY 79 will also
  see greater attention to  occupational noise exposure and  the initiation of a
  national noise assessment feasibility study.
            J3;
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2t DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
• M M M M M M • M ^ ^ W ^ M M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ M ^ .*• ^ ._ ^ ^ _K ^ _ «* ^ ^ ^ « ^ ^      «.   ^         ^
"™^^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ «• ^ ^ gp W^ V V W w ^ • W w 1W ^ ™ W ^ • ^ • ^ m 9 V IV V W IB V w • ^ ^ ^ • V IB
A. DECISION UNIT  TITLE AND CODE         HQ      MEDIAj NOISE
C215  NOISE  STRATEGIES  IMPLEMENTATION            APPROt A & C
** W • •• * *• • • • • • <• • • W • O • • *• W • • • ^ • ^ ^ ^ • • ^ ^ •• ^^ M ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • <• ^ • ^ ^ M ^  ^^^k^^ ^ ^ M ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 8Q INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         25.0          25.0         20.0         20.0
 LEVEL              OPFT         ia.0          15.0         13.0          13.0
01 OF 08             FTE                       tit>tU         ai.O         41.0
   BUDGET AUTH.  fOOO.O)     2,131.0      3,563.8      2,672.9      2»672.9
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description  and Benefits

         At  this level of resources the program will include four QCPs  —  two
    continued from FY 79 and two initiated  in FY 80.  The ECHO program  will'be
    expanded to  fifty community noise  advisors, ten over the FY 79 level.  State
    assignees will remain at ten.  Four of  the eight airport noise abatement
    planning projects carried out in FY 79  will be continued.  Four interagency
    demonstration projects will be completed and two new ones will be initiated.

         The level of effort' provided  by this level of resources is expected to
    generate the following number of local  communities havingprograms covering;
    motor vehicles, 25; stationary sources, 9; planning, 4; construction noise,
    6; and public awareness, 9.  (These figures assume an 80% success rate for
    the ECHO program.)

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

         Failure to fund this level will result in the elimination of organized
    programs for the delivery of technical  assistance to State and local
    governments, as well as the elimination of Federal coo.rdination activities.
    Both of  these areas have major ongoing  projects whose interuption would re-
    sult in  the  loss of benefits from  previous years' efforts.  More importantly
    the strengthening of State and local government capabilities to abate  noise
    is viewed by EPA as the most important  area of noise abatement, once major
    Federal  noise regulations are developed.  Congress, through the noise  over-
    sight hearings and through pending legislation, has also placed major
    emphasis on  this area.
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                •   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       HEDIA|  NOISE
5215  NOISE  STRATEGIES  IMPLEMENTATION             APPROf  A I  C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY  80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          25.0          25.o           2.0         22,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          14.0          15.0           2.0         15,0
02  OF 08        ,     FTE                        46,a           3,9         43,9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     2,131.0      3,563.8         534,5      3,207.4
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

    Description and Benefits

        Funding of this level will provide an additional 10 ECHO community noise
    advisors bringing  the total  program to 60 noise advisors.   Education  and
    consumer information support will be provided to technical programs,  the
    noise regulations  process, and the noise labeling program.   Agency  staff will
    work with 20 school systems  to incorporate the EPA noise curriculum into
    their program,  expanding  the number of systems to a total  of 45.  Two
    additional lAG's with Federal agencies are provided for, thereby increasing
    EPA's influence over the  important policies of Federal agencies in  the noise
    field (FHWA, HUD,  DOD,  (air  bases), UMTA, etc.).   Efforts  to follow-up on
    aviation noise proposals  made to the TAA are provided for  so that the work
    of past years is not lost.   Assistance to other Federal agencies in imple-
    menting policy changes  achieved in previous years is also  provided*  for
    under this level.

        This level of resources will result in the generation of the following
    additional number  of local communities having programs covered:  Motor
    Vehicles 3,  Stationary Source 2, Public Awareness 2.

    Impact of Not Funding This Level

        Not funding this level  will have two major impacts:  the elimination of
    most education and consumer  information activities for noise, and the
    elimination of a significant portion of the Federal coordination program.
    Noise education and consumer information are essential supportive elements of
    most noise program areas. Consequently, failure to fund the activity will
    make less than optimum use of resources expended in other  parts of  the noise
    program.  Noise education and consumer information also served as major foci
    of Congressional attention in the Congressional oversight  hearing held this
    past year.

        The maintenance of an active Federal coordination program is important
    because many of the most  effective mechanisms for noise abatement and control
    lie within the programs and  activities of other Federal agencies.   Without
    the direction and  assistance provided by the EPA Federal noise coordinating
    function, most agencies will be unable or unwilling to do their part  in re-
    ducing the level of harmful  noise.
             'J31 i
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 ORM  21 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 ,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HQ       MEDIA}  NOISE
G215  NOISE  STRATEGIES  IMPLEMENTATION             APPROJ  A I  C

8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E,   FY  60  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          25.0          25.0           3.0      '    25.0
 LEVEL              OPFT         .14.0          15.0          10.0          25.0
03  OF  08             FTE                        46.4          15.7          60.6
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)      2,131.0       3,563.8         356.4      3,563.8
    	'	!	.	1	1	',.
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Description and Benefits

        At this level of  resources  one  additional aviation noise proposal to the
    FAA is to be prepared  and one  general  aviation airport noise abatement pro-
    ject will be initiated.   In addition,  the  concepts developed in  airport noise
    abatement planning will  be transferred to  the field of railyard  noise abate-
    ment planning through  one demonstration project.  Public information and
    education materials are  to be  prepared for use in target communities where
    ECHO advisors and regional personnel are working.

    Impact of Not Funding  This Level

        Failure to fund this level  means  that EPA will not be able  to pursue
    more stringent source  regulations  with the FAA (source regulations ai;e the
    most cost-effective means of aviation noise abatement).  Neither will we be
    able to demonstrate the  practicality of noise abatement and land use planning
    for general aviation airports  (airports primarily serving private  and corpor-
    ate aircraft).  Without  the development and demonstration of these techniques
    to local communities and airport operators, we can expect noise  from general
    aviation airports to grow into a major problem similar to that of  today's
    commercial airports.  Another  consequence  of not funding this level results
    from the court ordered promulgation  of noise standards for railroad facili-:-.
    ties.  This regulation will create the need for noise abatement  planning by
    railroads and local communities  all  across the country.  Since this is a
    new and undeveloped area for noise abatement planning, there is  a  need for
    EPA to demonstrate that  railroad noise abatement planning is both  practical
    and effective.  The railyard regulation's  effectiveness will be  severely
    jeopardized unless at  least one  such demonstration is carried out". .
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



















0
z
—
O 2
> Z
UJ •-*
CO
to *-t
UJ l_)
^ Uj
•< c
CO ••
c.
u. z
I- C
2 il
~


z
c

.-
*~
2
UJ
r r
O U»
»- a.
o
•e cc
oi C
UJ
UJ •-
to <
•-« d
C i-
2 05

* UJ
a v>

•< c
~
<
•C IT
"1 ""*
j- r-» rv
rv tr

53
CC
O^


c
f> ^
— CO
tiJ
I
CO
UJ
rv u
CO Z
O" •••*
— 2
5
O.


«c
a
••*







bJ
»— i
0 »-
co -:
— ^
r
u


UJ
c i.
e. uj
o* a.
r



*-
O~ LL>
r*.
o- c.
E


-J
t^ IP
cr t-
^~ o
4























cr — a~
n. c h- a
r- r- ox
£> =3 fU r-
f\J — F*l *»


o- — o- — •
e\t c r- =r
r- p- c -c
<£ ^ A* F*-
«*. •, » «
r\t *- P*> —





& t*" l\l — ' O O O Q&^v^OO^
rv (c =i o o K^ — r- o *- w rv in =j
r— o -o r*- i\i »^ s o o c- o oj — * cr
>o ec a r nj o- rv r-
r\j — — " K» f\i -N



o- f- rw — o o o in^*»ooo^
rv n. = o c- -A — =r — K^ a- AJ ru Ki
r*-c-£'r*-A*«-G K)Cf\o-
4>tc&7 in -- a- ru
* *• »




CD/W4)*«009 CD fU io4>
•£• O- -£> ^ nj -* S3 * 0s -C ^C Al — T
ire-ire iro^iro-
KI n. — KI rxi ^«


O 0 O — O O OOO—OO
— ec K> ru ir» ^ -»fw*-
— aj a — WAJO- —
*. *, » * ^ *.
rxi «• »* nj •« *-




o o
0 C
c *- o *-
Ift *-U.UJ « H-U.U.
ic^ ^^>u.a-*- «w* j^u_a»-
o < o G. O u. c - **( ^-z>c>-«
.JUJ*-!^**- _Jli.'— •L-'**-
LuiSiw^^x^j-^ ijj^j*^N-*_jfc^
>d H-y; >C ^-to
u.1^ ^C? Lu — — O
_j£T oa — * IT oa
CC —
Kl O
^O •£
in o-
K\ —
IT -
Kl O
^ «
in a
Kl —


CD —
• •
Kl O
-ft  «* AJ »4





to IM -o •- o o 9
K) c- 9 o in in ~e
-c o- -c ^} r\j -* 9
in o- in o-
K- fU —


O C- O — O 0
-• co Kiru in 9
K> ru o r^- ru ^
— tv o- —
» * *
ru -. —




o
o
cs »-
«^ h- U. UJ
cc ^ j ^» u. a •—
o < c a o u.
• UJ tt O ^* ^
U. X to ^ C:
o •- r> r «* —

•»> •< x a 2"
0 t— CO C
»- z x >- **
— 1 UJ *^ UJ < *-
UJ tl ^» •- _> — i
> C! »- to
uj = r> o
_i cr co.

-------
LU

O
u
LU
H
o
cc
a.
p
5  <
ES
>  w
z  tn
LU  t-

    LU

    I
    V)
   O
   o
   o
    Z
   U
   LU

   Q
   tc
   O


W 0
o
z <

.. o.'
< O
O n
sS




o;

_ d
O uj
X C




LO
CM
o


c
•H
4-1
CO
4J
C
O)
E
01
c.
M
bO
0)
CO
j-i
0)
03
•H
O
Z
UJ
O
O
u
o
z
<
*I— "
UJ

1 	
CISION UNITl
UJ
Q
^«





co
Z
UJ
5
I
j
a.
O
o
u
UJ
5
2
D
1
>
m







J
UJ
UJ
-J


J
>
UJ


1
«J
UJ
^
UJ
•J,
_J
UJ
UJ
_1
1
-J
UJ

UJ
H
UJ


UJ
"-1
o

o »
- o
> cc
U. CL

UJ
K
ii
K
L^ 1X1



MEASURE
#
UJ

t-
^»
£
Z
COMPLISHMEI
u
<
CO
,















-crocsjcNcM o ^^



O-OCMCMCM o 0 -H CO
l-i S C CO l-i
•H QJ -H O Z OJ
<"OZ> -H CT3
QJ-H J->< 00)
rCC^O) 10 O. 1-1 fa
•U-H4J03U UW JJ *£
•H«-HJ->« 3 coj=<
CO) H C -H T-l
03vHtO^-,CO -H -OS 0

CJi-HS-HM-H & O ^
c-y-i-iaiJ-1 co 003 03
«3 •" SO -r) -H O*T3 OCrH
4JC4JC6CC T3 ' -H < S O CO
CD3O3C3O)Q) 4JOI E-H 03
"^ c Ci) E *H EOC C003Z cdwSO
CBOOOCOcOcO M0> WJUZO
DJ "H 03C U-I03E S-I'CB Cw
H M-t *4-i CM M-i -H -H S C>^3 B-C"
CflOOOO O03COOI MC/JrH O03C
U C 4J 03SS SrHE^O
slllllo.05.03 ^^"S 2S"oi
H ZCL, Z< ZW O-O- CM WO to M< 
-------
u
z
LU
O
o
UJ
H
o
CE
a.
LU
    2
    LU
    O
    O
    O
    D

    2
    O
    u
    UJ
    Q
   'CC
    O
    LL

0) L3
CO
o
z <

.. p.'
< 0
O ^
5 <




PS
z
O


O
O at
X C£






EN
3
c
o
•H
JJ
JJ
c
(U
0)

d
g
M
00
0)
C3
CO
0)
CO
•H

Z
LU
Q
0
u
D
Z
LU
h-
H
t
Z
•y
DECISIOr
<






CO
z
LU
5
X
co
p.
O
U
CJ

H
_l
D

3
0
CO
a
>
LL






_J
LU
LU



_
LU
LU



LU
^
LU
_]



LU
>
LU
J



LU

LU
_J

LU
LU
-J


O)
O) -;
" 0
> «r
LL p.

LU

m 5
>• to
LL LU



MEASURE
08
LU
-J
t
H
)-
Z
LU
s
X
CO
1
ACCOMPi
CD


















m o\






P^ O"s



r>j m
*

t


vr n





rH iH



at
c c
O -H CO
C -H AJ C
0 « =0
^ « S -H
jj -H E 4->
e < ^S
5 c E K
LJ O I— I C
§ » « 1
U y -HQ
g ^v 0) 0
2 » o1 S<
M 3 K MM
£ -5 14-)
£ JJ O. CO MH O
w C 3 rH O
_j O 1 tB CO
tn U S CO Lj jj
2 ^ 0 O CU rH
53 H G. * 3
^ --I O E W
0, O M 3Q)
r» fiti P-i !Z Pi


(


























A
\
~




















ec
•
IN
^
O
o
u.
a


-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM V.  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ  OE      MEDIA:  Noise

     Noise Enforcement  (G305)                       REG-	APPRO:  Enf
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
 Long Range Goals:  Assure that manufacturers of products which are regulated
 under sections 6 and 8 of the Noise Control Act of 1972 distribute in commerce
 products  that comply with the applicable  new product noise emission standards,
 or informational labeling requirement,  or both.  Assist State/local governments
 in the development of effective noise enforcement programs.
 iajor Objectives:   Enforcement of those section 6 noise emission standards and
 section 8 informational labeling requirements  that have the greatest potential
 for reducing the levels of environmental noise and consequently for protecting
 the public health and welfare.
 Integration of  Federal, State and local noise  enforcement activities into a
 coordinated national program to  reduce  levels  of environmental noise and to
 ensure in-use compliance of regulated products with applicable section 6
 noise  emission  standards and section 8  informational labeling requirements.
  C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 - Initiate enforcement of section 6  new product noise emission standards for
   portable air  compressors and medium and heavy duty trucks.
 - Development of enforcement programs for both additional section 6 noise
   emission standards and section 8 information labeling requirements.
 - Provide State and local noise  control programs with assistance and guidance
   in the development and enforcement of their  noise control regulations and
   ordinances.                                                       *
 Specific accomplishments that supported these  overall accomplishments  are as
 follows:
 - All  production verification  (PV) reports submitted by truck and compressor
   manufacturers were reviewed.
 - Records and facilities of all  compressor manufacturers and 90% of the first
   stage truck manufacturers were inspected.
   Three (3)  selective enforcement audits (SEA) were ordered and monitored.
   Contractor surveillance testing of regulated in-use medium and heavy duty
   trucks  was initiated.
   Administrative hearing procedures  were proposed and a regulation controlling
   the  importation of regulated products was forwarded to the U.S.  Customs
   Service for its review and approval.
   PV tests conducted by truck and compressor manufacturers were monitored by
   Noise Enforcement Division personnel.
   Site correlation tests were conducted by the Noise Enforcement Division with
   truck and compressor manufacturers.
   Noise enforcement training program for police officers was developed.
 - Assistance was provided to five (5) State and (25)  local noise enforcement
   programs.
 - Development of a compilation of legal memoranda on State and local noise
   enforcement issues.
EPA Form 2410-10(8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HQ   QE      MEDIA:  Noise

     Noise Enforcement (G305)                        REG.         APPRO:  Enfant.
  D)  FY 79  PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
  - Continued enforcement  of  section  6 new product noise  emission standards for
   portable air  compressors  and medium  and heavy duty  trucks.
  - Initiate enforcement of section 8 labeling  requirements  for hearing
   protectors.
  - Continue assistance and guidance  to  State and local noise  enforcement
   programs.
  - Continue development of enforcement  strategies for  additional section 6
   standards  and section  8 labeling  requirements.
  Planned accomplishments  include:
  - Review  of  production verification (PV)  reports for  new model year  trucks
   and compressors.
  -The issuance  of  (22) selective enforcement  audit  CSEA) test requests.
  - The monitoring and conducting of  (33)  PV and (22) SEA tests conducted under
   the applicable regulations.
  - The inspection of (18) compressor and  (21)  truck manufacturers'  records and
   facilities.
  - The conducting of test site  comparison noise emission tests with regulated
   manufacturers.
  - The development  of a catalog of noise  control experts for  use  by State and
   local noise enforcement agencies.                                 •
  - The development  of a guidance package  for State and local  prosecutors  for
   use in  enforcement of State and local  noise control ordinances.
  - The promulgation or proposal of enforcement strategies for  seven (7)  section
   6 new product standards and section  8  labeling requirements.
  Alternative  schemes for enforcement of the compressor and  truck  standards
 were  considered.   Some of those considered were:
  1. Certification program similar to that  used by Mobile Source Air Pollution
    Control Program.  The benefits of this  type of program  are  as follows:
           -  EPA in complete control of testing; EPA personnel would
              conduct the testing.
           -  Manufacturers would know prior to start of  actual  production that
              they comply with the regulation since this program is  based  on
              prototype testing.
    The resource implications are that  the Noise Enforcement Division would
    need at least 62 people in FY 1979  to  conduct certification testing of
    trucks and compressors.   In FY 1980 additional personnel would  be necessary
    for testing of other products for which section 6  standards would become
    effective.  The estimated 62 people is based upon  the MSAPC personnel
    involved  in certification testing of light duty vehicles in FY  1978.
 2.  Testing of a statistical sample of early production products  similar  to
    the sampling plan used in the current  SEA program.   Benefits of this
    approach  are:
           -  EPA is assured that manufacturers can build production products
              that comply with the regulation.
           - Manufacturers would conduct the testing with EPA  observing.
           -  Since this  involves up-front statistical testing, the need fqr^ .
             subsequent  SEA's may be greatly reduced.                     Uw -  5
    Resource  impacts for enforcement of truck and compressor standards are
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

'FORM!:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HQ 0£       MEDIA:  Noise

     Noise Enforcement CG305)                        REG.         APPRO:  Enfant,
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION      (CONT'D)

     estimated to be significant.   A single statistical testing program requires
     at least 10 man-weeks of effort to monitor.   Assuming that the 37 known
     manufacturers of trucks and compressors  had an average of 20 models and
     NED monitored 50% of the statistical testing of these models, 90 man-years
     of effort would be required.   It would also require re-regulation for
     trucks and compressors, and additional testing burden on manufacturers.
     For small volume production categories (as is the case in many instances
     for trucks, compressors and compactors), would appreciably increase the
     cost of compliance.
  3.  A reactive enforcement program where NED would follow-up with an investi-
     gation of regulatory violations that were brought to its attention.  This
     type of program would rely on feedback from State/local agencies and
     concerned citizens for identification of violations.  The "benefits" of
     this type of program are that it requires a minimum commitment of Agency
     resources.   Benefit  to the public health and welfare would in all likeli-
     hood be low.   Voluntary compliance does  not work.  Some Federal oversight
     is required to maintain any level of compliance.
  Items (1), (2) and (3)  do not warrant additional consideration or study.
  Item 1 does not because it would mean a significant  commitment of Agency re-
  sources to handle the testing burden and may not be  effective in terms of
  demonstrating the noise emission performance of actual production products.
  Item 2, because it also requires a significant commitment of Agency resources
  for monitoring and greatly increases the testing burden of the regulated
  manufacturers.  It would also require re-regulations for trucks and compressors
  Item 3 does not because it is a  form of voluntary compliance which has been
  demonstrated to be non-effective in the long-range.   Manufacturers may decide
  that the cost of compliance is significantly greater than any liabilities that
  they could incur as a result of  enforcement.   They may conclude that the risk
  of  being found in non-compliance does not justify the cost of compliance.
  A fourth alternative is being considered and parts of it are being studied.
  This is contract support for enforcement where the non-critical work is done
  by  a contractor.   The contractor could conceivably review PV reports, conduct
  surveillance testing, monitor and conduct PV testing; recommend manufacturers
  for SEA testing.   One benefit of this type  of program is that manufacturers
  are still in control of the bulk of the testing and  EPA has an effective
  enforcement program with a minimum commitment of Agency manpower.  Resource
  impacts would be significant in  terms of dollars. Also, the total contract
  effort would be limited by the availability of Agency personnel to monitor
  contract performance and handle  any enforcement actions that result from
  contractor's efforts.
  Portions of it are being studied and warrant further study.  In FY 1978,
  contractors are performing surveillance testing on in-use regulated medium
  and heavy duty trucks and are reviewing production verification reports
  submitted by the same manufacturers.   Additional contracts should be let
  during FY 1979 to obtain additional data for a complete evaluation of this
  alternative's  effectiveness.
     f^ **  •"»                                                                       I
     Uo-o
 EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  25 DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAt NOISE*"
G305  NOISE  ENFORCEMENT                             APPRO, ENFORCEMENT

B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY  79 C. E.   FY  60 INCR "  FY 80*CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         aa.o         22.0          IB.O          is.o
 LEVEL              OPFT     .     2.0          2.0           2.0           2.0
01  OF 09             FTE                       25.9          22.9          22,9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     1,000,0        977.9         783,0        783.0
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
  This level provides for partial enforcement of section 6 new products  standards
  for portable air compressors  and medium and heavy duty trucks.  At best,  it is
  estimated that time-of-sale complaince will only be 75% for these two  products.
  This level provides for review of 40% of the submitted Production Verification
  (PV) reports for trucks and compressors. If successful in FY 1979,  contract for
  review of remaining 60% of truck/compressor PV reports will be  let.  Contract to
  conduct surveillance testing  of these two products in-use wd.ll  be let.   A
  limited number of PV tests and Selective Enforcement Audit (SEA)  tests will be
  monitored and conducted.  Sixteen (16) inspections of manufacturers'  records
  and 10 site comparison  studies will be conducted. This level of enforcement
  will achieve a reduction of 23% in the total equivalent population exposed to
  noise levels due to trucks and compressors in excess of Ldn = 55  dBA.  This
  assumes a linear deterioration after sale in the noise emission performance of
  trucks and compressors  and a  minimal State/local enforcement: effort (20%
  effective).  No enforcement of other effective section 6 standards will result
  in an initial time-of-sale compliance of 40%.
                TIME OF SALE     *            STATE/LOCAL       %         TOTAL  %
  PRODUCTS      COMPLIANCE    EXPECTED RED .I/ EFFECTIVENESS EXPECTED RED.  ACHIEVE)
  Trucks/Comp.       75%          16.0            20%          3.2%        19.2
  Buses, et al      40%	2.8	20%   	0.56%	3.4
                                                         TOTAL LEVEL 1 -  22.6
  I/ Expected reduction is  expressed as the percent reduction in total equivalent
     population exposed to  noise levels in excess of Ldn = 55 dBA.  The following
     expected reductions  were  developed by the Office of Noise Abatement  and
     Control assuming no  deteriorations:
     TRUCKS:        27.6%                COMPACTORS:        1.4%
     COMPRESSORS:    15.0%                REEFERS:           2.1%
     TOTAL	42.6%                BUSES:             0.2%
                                         MOTORCYCLES:       10.0%
                                         TOTAL	13.7%

  Not funding this level  eliminates the Agency's noise enforcement  program.
  Funding this level does not  allow any enforcement of additional section 6
  standards that are effective for motorcycles, buses,  compactors and truck  re-
  frigeration units and of  section 8 labeling requirements that are effective
  for hearing protectors, vacuum cleaners and air conditioners, any development
  of enforcement strategies for additional section 6 and 8 products,  and  any
  assistance and guidance to State/local noise programs for enforcement
  activities.
                                                                      ">'"»' "7
                                                                      I  j 1 •
                                                                      \J v   i
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

 ORM  ^l DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDIAi NOISE
G305  NOISE  ENFORCEMENT                             APPROi ENFORCEMENT

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.  FY  60 INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          2«.o          22.0           2.0         20.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           2.0           2,0           1,0          3,0
02  OF  09             FTE                        25.9           2.«         25.3
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     1,000.0        977.9         97.9        880,9
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   This  level provides for the  EPA  review of 75% of truck and  compressor Pro-
   duction Verification (PV)  reports  (660 of 880) and for the  inspections of all
   truck and compressor manufacturers records and facilities.  Two additional PV
   tests  will be monitored and  two  additional PV tests and an  additional Selective
   Enforcement Audit (SEA) test will be conducted.   Time-of-sale compliance level
   increases to 90%.   Expected  reduction in total equivalent people impacted by
   truck and compressor noise increases from 22.6% in Level 1  to 26%.  Increased
   level of in-use surveillance testing can be accomplished.   Not funding this
   level allows for 75% non-compliance with truck and compressor standards and
   attendant reduction in environmental benefits of reduced  truck and compressor
   noise levels.  Funding this  level does not allow any enforcement of additional
   section 6 standards that are effective for motorcycles, buses, compactors and
   truck refrigeration units  and of section 8 labeling requirements that are
   effective for hearing protectors, vacuum cleaners and air conditioners, any
   development of enforcement strategies for additional sections 6 and 8 products,
   and  any assistance and guidance  to State/local noise programs for enforcement
   activities.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
FOR*  21 DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE
G305  NOISE  ENFORCEMENT
HQ
      f  NOISE
APPROi  ENFORCEMENT
, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
3 OF 09 PTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY
24.0
2.0

1,000.0
79 C. E.
22.0
2.0
25.9
977.9
FY 80 INCR
2.0
2.0
3.8
97.9
FY 80 CUM
22.0
5.0
29.1
978.8
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  This level provides for the development of  enforcement strategies  and
  attendant regulatory packages for  additional section 6 noise emission
  standards and section 8 labeling requirements.  There are five (5)  packages
  scheduled to be promulgated and one  (1) to  be proposed.  Not funding this  level
  eliminates any development of enforcement strategies and attendant regulatory
  packages for both section 6 noise  emission  standards and section  8 informa-
  tional labeling requirements.   Funding  this level does not allow  any enforce-
  ment of section 6 standards that are effective for motorcycles, buses,
  compactors, and reefers and section  8 labeling requirements for vacuum
  cleaners and air conditioners.
 EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
• •>••*••••• • V • • • W • • • V • • • W • • • IB V V V V • IV W • • •• • •••••••• • • • W OT V • • • • ^ ^ • •  ^^ ^^ ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ       MEOIA|  NOISE
G305  NOISE ENFORCEMENT                             APPROj  ENFORCEMENT

8, RESOURCE  SUMMARY      FY 78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY 8Q  IN/CR    FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         2a,o         22.0           1,0         23.0
 LEVEL             OPFT      .    2.0          2.0           2.0          7.0
04 OF 09             FTE                       25.9           3,9         33.0
   BUDGET AUTH, (000.0)     1,000.0        977.9          25.0      1,003,8
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  This level provides for the minimal development of a program to develop
  enforcement guidance  and assistance for State/local noise  enforcement programs.
  This will raise the level of effectiveness  in supporting Federal enforcement
  activities to 30%.  Reduction in total equivalent people impacted by noise
  above Ldn = 55  dBA goes from 27% at Level 3 to 29.6%.   Not funding this level
  eliminates any  assistance and guidance to State/local noise enforcement
  programs.  Funding this level does  not allow any enforcement of section 6
  standards that  are effective for buses, motorcycles,  compactors and truck
  refrigeration units and section 8 labeling  requirements for vacuum cleaners
  and air conditioners, and development of enforcement strategies for additional
  section 6 standards and section 8 labeling  requirements.
        03 r
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A. DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE
G305  NOISE ENFORCEMENT
                HQ
MEDIAj  NOISE
APPROj  ENFORCEMENT
B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS
 LEVEL              OPFT
05 OF  09            FTE
   BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E.
     24.0         22.0
       2.0          2.0
                   25.9
  1,000.0        977,9
 FY  80 INCR
         1.0
         2.0
         3.8
        72.9
FY 80  CUM
     24*0
       9.0
     36.6
  1,076.7
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   This level provides  for  the expanded development of a program  to develop
   enforcement guidance and assistance for State/local noise enforcement
   programs.  This will raise the level of effectiveness in supporting Federal
   enforcement activities to 40%.  Reduction in total equivalent  people impacted
   by noise above Ldn = 55  dBA goes from 29.6% at Level 4 to 32.2%.  Not funding
   this level eliminates any expanded assistance and guidance to  State/local
   noise enforcement programs.  Funding this level does not allow any enforcement
   of section 6 standards that are effective for buses, motorcycles, compactors
   and truck refrigeration  units and section 8 labeling requirements for'vacuum
   cleaners and air conditioners, and development of enforcement  strategies for
   additional sections  6 and 8 products.
                                                                     Gi
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)

-------



















2
iu
ts
<
>-
z a
•^ r
»- f
u 3
U. (O
C uJ
a u
°" 1
•e to
z a
UJ
r f-
o z
IE r>
> z
z o
UJ >-.
CO
CO >-
UJ U
« e
CO ••
>- ex
Z w
3







z
X
UJ
•- u
z ct
UJ C
I U..
U. Z
U Us
cc
0 UJ
u, «&
IT *••
UJ O
2!
<
< in
c
— o ££
uo: 2. ""-




33
CC
cr

eo
0- ~
UJ
Z
1—4
^_
UJ

rxj cs
HJ ^
c~ •— »
~ 2
a.
*_x

f
o^







UJ
~
tc <.
*- ^3
x
3
*"*

•-
UJ
o r
ec uj
e- a
~H

*-
to
r-
O- D:
~ a
CJ
_j
r*- — -
0* »-
<




















o ^
• •
ft Q
c o

0 f*-
PO ?*
 * -C O 1C
f- to ru r^





0 ^ O f^ 0
f^l * O W O
CD f*- O O «—
IN. tfl fy r^




r- —  *^ «c


o o o o o
oin *f* o a-
o r^ fv o iv
-

,_
o
c
o
^ >-
C < C Q.
• uj or o
u. I CO ~ 0
c — n r «« —
3 O « •-- CO
— « r ct z
c »- co c
^ Z X >- M
_l UJ •"« UJ < »-
UJ t& 1-* ^^ _J 1^
>• £^ *•• CO
UJ ^ ^ O
_>ec o a


o- cc
» •
o rv.
cc o
cc r-
.
o rw
ec o
CO ^


0- CO
« c
c ru
ec tr-
ee r-

C» CO
o ru
ec t>
ec f-






ot> or^ruccooKi
ojru orviecruoKiin
ec * oj r-





CO OKl«^00=T
OJOJ ^£*>COOJv^OJ
ru t> r^ oj cc




ec- fr-CKi — oeo-
ojm »^«"Xoruruin
OJ ^ O t^ CO OJ OJ
O- -O KI CC


o o c e> c o o
oj o in in o si oj
o r^ ru o ru
0 -t> KI O-

^
O
c
»- o >-
U. UJ « •- U. UJ
cu, c  O
O *— Z> T *« ••
O C- < »-» CO
oj •< I c: z
C H- CO C
1— 2 X >- »-l
_j U.1 •-« UJ < »-
UJ CJ ^ ^^ J t-i
> C f- CO
uj = r> o
— J ec o a


cc . o-
• •
ec e=
p»- C
er cc
ec C>
CO 0
f- CC
0- CC


cc c-
• •
cc o
>-. CC
o cc

cc 0-
ec" o
t- cc
0- eo






ec o «c P- o c •*
co a o- o nj in o
o r* fu ec





a- KI *c *« o o cc
*•» -o «« ec oj oj K*
o r^ nj cc




o-  o o cr-
r^ — •£ o ru oj 1/1
f^ o f- eo oj oj
o- o KI ec


0 O O O O O
o in in o sr oj
o r- ru o oj
o « KI c-

„
c
o
o *-
K H- U. UJ
C « 0 0. C U.
• UJ or c ^ *-*
u. i v. r e:
o *- ~ t « —
o o < -^ co
K! < I CC Z
C f- CO O
»- Z X >- >-
_! UJ -» UJ < H-
UJ 15 ^* ^* «J i^
> C >- CO
uj r z; c
_i cc o a.


CC ST
• •
KI KI
0 C
0 O-
CO 3
K^ HI
C 0
O tt-


60 SI

KI KI
C5 0
e o-

ec 9
KI KI
0 0
c  K) f» KI
o r- ru o- »
^ ,




o e in o e> o-
in in oj — ru KI
oj ru ru





t- •« -o o oj ru in
^. o f^ cC' oj ru
e> x K> cc


0 O O 0 0 O
o m in o 9 oj
c r^ oj o ru
o -c KI a

-*-»
o
0
o ^>
•ft *- U. U.
C « 0 O. O U.
• UJ a: o ^ ^^
U. I CO ^ O
O *- 3 r *FI ••
3 C •< •— 10
=i < r CE z
0 1- CO O
<- Z X J- «
_l UJ •• > U- « t-
uj o *•* *^ ~J •"*
> c »- to
UJ - => C
_j ec o a.


f~ O
• •
* o
r^ *
o tr
r- o
•c o-
f* ^
e o


r- o
v A
•c o-
f^ •£>
0 C-

r* o
« o*
r^ -c
0 5-
»





»- oj in es o
»C KI KI fr ^
o r~ oj o-
_




» rv t~ -o o
ru o KI in •-
t^- r\t o ^

a


C- * KI — O
r^ ~* .c o ru
f^ O F~ I» OJ
o-.Cf.ec


o o c o o
o in in o sr
o r- rv o ru
0 >O KI »

„
o
o
o
M »-
c < o a.
• uj or o
u. i co — c
o *- 3 T: « —
3 o < *- to
in « r ct z
e i- to o
1- Z X >- »-!
_1 UJ — UJ < t-

•> Ci >- CO
—ice c'a.
CO
h-
Kl
1
o-
O



































































-------
u
2
o <
i- Z
«- z
C UJ
or u
a a
z a
u;
z »-
2 **
c r
> 2
i C
« e
»»
to —
   f^
c
U. £
>- a
-• o
     U UJ
     IT
     O UJ
     u. to


     U.1 O
        2
     <
     < 1A
        O
     (V C,
     IN. ti
              tr
              o- «
              ru o
              C 2
              c- —
              — r
                r
             c z
             flC UJ
             o- a:
                to
             O* UJ
             r^
             o- a


                u
o o-
 •  •
t\l IT
                       u. bj
                     c- a. *-
                     o o u.
                                                                                                           c:-3

-------
<*,
   u
        o
        •z.
        ai
        o
        I-
        o
        LU
        H
        o
        a:
        a.
        I-


        LU
        ED
        "> CO
        UJ
         UJ

         5
         I
         to
         O
         o
         a
         2

         2
         to

         o
         UJ
         en
         O
4J
a
QJ
E
OJ
^
0) P
03 O
, 1 L^
o c
z w

. . o.'
< o
o ^
LU a.
2 <



us
s
<
o

u
O LU
X LT





















LU /— N
Q tn
8g
O V^
< J-1
m QJ
-J H
H *
— O
h- p
I- °
— >4-l
2 e
Z! W
2 01
O to
"0
u s
LU
Q
<








C/J


LU
g
I
a.
O
u
<
LU
^
t
D
5

o
CO
O)
T-
>
U-




J
LU

LU
— '
.
H
_]
LU
^
LU
 EC
U. 0.
LU
(-
eo ^
en 2
U. UJ





LU
tr
t/)
LU
UJ
t-

K
>-
.N3IAIHSI
_i
c.
O
U
o
<-
m

-






or--ooocs woo o  • r- '. rvl r-H
00



OI^-OOOCN WOO O CM fsjOO-O-i-i OO O u"i
(» CM CM en t-i CM
00


Or-ooorsl WOO O O OoOH cnoo-^-iH oo o o
OOCMCMiH r-t CM ?O
00


otnm^Hr— i oo r— i r» o CM -^-ooo oo o o
O CM tH i— 1 i— 1 i— 1 fi-)

r^
"W CJ
M 03 00
0) p CO
M -0 0) .*
S 0) LJ [J 0) *O
cjoTJoJj-ieo. os re
Cd O.OI-HOO) Q) -H OJWXI
iw OJJticdE OJ03 4J^-iCJ-J
t) 3 MCd3>wO) Ui-< "O *OCd >O
OJ'O'O C G.6C4J3U CO a)*Ofl)60 OJt-l 03
Sajoi cd rHwet-i toe saip-H PAJ E
(UP4J g C03 COO'O 0)!-i04J re m
•TjOO-B-B OCECE^ -Hr-l -HOJJB3 CD60 l-i
>jjDa)Qju-i oioo c sn >jj^Ha) JJ^H ^
OJ -H *O p 4J O PP03'Oa) 60O 0)-HC> 034J O
P C C O O O. iH 01 T3 OCOPCOC -HtD p
OO.U3W 4J piJtHOJAJr-la) OE-H i-HO) O.

•u ccoa)o)o3cx.HOoa)o)O4J coao eoc o>
P CC to O O *H «H E t»0 E 3 O i"H E^JCPCOAJC C "^ CO
(DttJocoKQjiHP pajQjPwcdOJaJ-ucj OJP c *o
p4J4J-.D.-HO-Q)->~.AJ'ao P4J Q, D.O 0)
<s»j>wwcc8cc-H *Jtnc*Jc>5><;cd reE •>^. co
~^ OJP-OE o) oitn
14-1 M-I IM IM IM IM tnl«y-i'«'i-1**-' 3<« a) O)u-iiwn-iw-i4jw-iy-i4jvi-i 03
OOOOOO'OOOOOO'OO'OOOOOOCJOOUOrt
P 30J-HP 33
CJQJDQJUCJUCilDQJCOOCDO'J-'QJOJOiQJCCiJCiJecjp '
rd ^ p£ .O pC ^ OJ ^O J3 ^O O ^ P «C P C J2 ^ O f*l Q O ^ Q )*1 QJ
z, z z. z z, z z. z. z z S ilii 3§ 3


















































CO
CO
CM
1
o
rs
E
o
u.
a
UJ

-------

-------

-------
>
o

UJ
O
<
2  §
K-  M
O  H


ol
    o
    CJ
z  >
UJ  !—

11
9l
    LU
    O.
    S
    O
    o
    u
    <
    3

    Z
    O


Q
•H
< as
•^
< 0
5 r
u £
5 <





a
3g
o
si


















2
UJ
—
U3
3
a.
O
U

1
^
1
•^
i
^
oo
o
u.




S
-1

UJ
UJ
.J

fl
*r
UJ
i>
UJ
^
1
u

2
J.
T
1
j
u
>
UJ
-J
n«
u
UJ
CJ
S _;
*~ O
> S
OB <
2 i
^ U
in1
O'
^^ i
^ '
^i LU
*M J — -

^ «
2»
i
s.
iH
4J
e a
cS §

f 9^ ^^ M I b
§ - -j 5." ^ -a 5
i
u o C eg a a w « cucao
os o o c a. c i) o e 0.02 s
CJ O r-l O -H U O rHTJ -H U JJ O
i-(
OO

o
o
r-l
O








at jj
M o
*o a> c
3 .£
•" *J -S
« r-l
_, JS 3
•-J o o
35 u
«* ir
_g u .H a
r-i 0 r-l AJ
O VM -H 03
^ ^ "°

X JJ Q.f-1
0 C (8 3
JJ 03 O 'JJ
JJ «0
iH g oj C
C8 iH CO i-l
5 5 r^ S C
S •" O O aj
— c a, a. 41
-
aj a g
a u
i. JJ 03 U 41
5 : u o -o
^ I 3 J3 T3 i-l
TT O 1 J^ *O JJ v4 ^
u a U
- C <
c a. o
0 fi a) U
cj a u e.
0 1
u teo
^4 * 5 CJ 4J n
> CO O CO
.* -0 0 0 X ^
C OJ JM Lf U Ctt
•H 4) a 3 JJ 3 41 a
•0?J3  J3
«• M ^j ^» rti wj ^^ ii
o a * e JJ ca oo >\ 3 c
C 4) O ON aj cS a 1 > 41 O
la O IM a r>. 3 <7t M  CO S CJ O i-l -H 4J p~( C3 >
JS ffl , JJ 3 3 JJ
C aj JJ C AOldU U JJ CO JJ
o«zcoa o JJ UO*H 4>3 ocococo
i-ijjij'Huoao'Hca jj T3 i-i u
03 4> 4) JJ O hiHJJ U JJ r-l 4) 4)
C 03 2 -C ea a, 3 3 r-l 03 JJ -H 41 S ^
Cd ^J O AJ W ^ CO C* ^3 CS i^ >1i!^ ^ QQ Q 4^
O.COCOO 4)w aj 5 -H JJ ea t=o 41 aj o
X « 1 C.I 4) O U O .£•* C-HI
W JJ 1 O 1 S *J JJ JJ CJ rs M T3 1
O
1^
JJ
a

a)
-= «o C
e cu o
•H (3 i-l
1 m u
C 80 aj
o e »-i
^
pH fM ^
a 41 to
s ea e
•H 4) -H
efl "D r-l
4) >> 0)
r-i jj .a
030
J3 13 al











































ca
=3
3 J- ^
X JJ •

4i a w
4J 4) JU
•H «£ a
2 §T
^
"
fN
_
ui
j»
                     !0