100R800Q3
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS
FISCAL YEAR 1980
ZBB BUDGET
;tion Age
OMB SUBMISSION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
-------
-------
100R80003
MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT/BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
CONTENTS
PAGE
A. MEDIA RESOURCE SUMMARY 1
B. MEDIA OVERVIEW 2
C. MEDIA RANKING 10
D. BUDGET REQUEST BY DECISION UNIT 14
E. ' DECISION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS AND
LEVELS
RESEARCH AND" DEVELOPMENT ' 22
ABATEMENT AND CONTROL -29
ENFORCEMENT 47 »
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES 54
AGENCY AND REGIONAL MANAGEMENT 60
-------
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FY 1980 OMB REQUEST
Management and Support
Media Resource Summary
FY 1979 FY 1980 Change
(dollars in thousands)
Research & Development
Permanent Positions 98 98
Budget Authority 20,974.7 22,967.1 +1,99?..A
Abatement & Control
Permanent Positions 170 172 +2
Budget Authority 45,787.5 53,609.0 +7,821.5
Enforcement
Permanent Positions 37 37 «...
Budget Authority 13,013.6 14,104.5 +1,090.9
Agency & Regional Management
Permanent Positions 2,241 2,422 +181
Budget Authority 94,223.0 106,815.0 +12,592.0
Buildings & Facilities
Budget Authority 2,563.0 1,425.0 -1,138.0
Reimbursements
Permanent Positions 1 1
Total
Permanent Positions 2,547 2,730 +183
Budget Authority 176,561.8 198,920.6 +22,358.8
-------
MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT MEDIA OVERVIEW
I. OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY
The Management and Support media provides the executive direction
of all Agency programs, associated staff and management activities, and
those Agency-wide administrative and supporting services which cannot
be readily associated with a particular programmatic activity. Several
components comprise this media: Policy Activities, Management Activities,
Support Services, and Building and Facilities.
Policy Activities
This component includes the overall direction of Agency-wide
programs and the associated staff functions which are closely related
to policy development and implementation.
Policy Direction in Headquarters consists of the Administrator
and Deputy Administrator and their immediate staffs; the Offices
of Regional and Intergovernmental Operations, Federal Activities,
Legislation, International Activities, Civil Rights, Public.
Awareness and Administrative Law Judges;.and the secretariat for
the Agency's Science Advisory Board. Regional elements cover
the Regional and Deputy Regional Administrators and their immediate
staffs as well as staff groups such as Public Affairs, Congressional
and Intergovernmental Relations, and Civil Rights.
Legal Services are provided to all Agency programs by the Office.
of General Counsel in Headquarters and by the Offices of Regional
Counsel in the Regions.
Management Activities
This component involves a variety of centralized management and
administrative activities required for Agency-wide operations.
Agency Management covers the Agency-wide management functions pro-
vided by the Office of Planning and Management (0PM) as well as
the administrative services which 0PM provides to all program
operations located in Headquarters; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Research
Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina. There are four major organi-
zational units within 0PM. The Office of Planning and Evaluation
provides an Agency-wide resource for economic, energy, and statistical
analysis; program evaluation; the coordinated review of standards
and regulations; and development of new policy initiatives and
regulatory reform. The Office of Resources Management is responsible
for program analysis and reporting, budgeting, accounting, and
-------
grants administration. The Office of Audit manages the Agency's
comprehensive audit program. The Office of Administration provides
services in the areas of personnel administration, management
analysis, procurement, data systems, facilities management, admin-
istrative services, and security at the locations referred to above.
Program Management covers policy formulation, program direction,
and the associated management activities which are performed within
each of EPA's five major program offices. Included are the Assist-
ant Administrators and their immediate staffs, the centralized
management staff of each program office, as well as the Deputy
Assistant Administrators and their staffs-.
Regional Management includes the centralized management and admin-
istrative functions performed in each Regional Office. Activities
include program planning, analyses and evaluation, financial and
personnel management, and administrative services.
Support Services -
This component encompasses the costs of general services which serve
the needs of all Agency programs. Included in this diverse category are:
*
Services which 0PM provides to all programs located at Headquarters,
RTP, and Cincinnati, including office and laboratory services,
building maintenance and alterations, library services, local
communications, utilities, and guard and custodial services;
Similar services at laboratories and field stations operated by
OANR, ORD, and OTS at other locations;
Services which 0PM provides to all Agency programs regardless of
location including facility rental costs, U.S. Postal Service
charges, Federal Telecommunication Service, and security clearances;
these are called "nation-wide" costs;
Centralized ADP timesharing services which 0PM provides to all
Agency components; and
Common services in the Regional Offices including office supplies,
equipment and services, motor vehicle rental, printing, and local
communications.
Buildings and Facilities
This covers the design and construction of new EPA-owned facilities
as well as repairs and improvements to Federally-owned installations which
are occupied by EPA.
3
-------
II. RANKING CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES
Several factors were considered in ranking the various decision units
included in the Management and Support media:
• The need to maintain and improve the basic management and
support services required to serve Agency programs;
• The need to enharice Agency-wide analytical capabilities,
in support of Agency policy development, particularly in
the Regional Offices;
• The growing requirements of the Regional Offices for legal
services;
• Continuity in the on-going program of replacing or repairing
existing EPA owned facilities to meet health and safety
standards and pollution control requirements; and
• Requirements for additional centralized management and support
services directly related to the program increase reflected
in the other media.
*
III. FY1980 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
The FY1980 estimates for the Management and Support media total
2,730 permanent full-time positions and $198.9 million. This is an
increase of 183 positions and $22.4 million over FY1979. This reflects
a number of reprogrammings within and among the individual decision
units which comprise the media, increases in the cost of providing essen-
tial service, and increases for new program requirements. The major
areas of change are summarized below:
IV. REQUEST SUMMARY
FY1980 Total Change from FY1979
Policy Direction PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Agency and Regional Management 528 21,542.8 +16 1,274.9
A Regional increase of 19 positions reflects EPA's emphasis on
public participation, State and local Governmental relations, and the
President's Minority Business Enterprise program. Funds are included
in the Regional increase for contracts to develop new methods of increasing
the number of minority-owned companies engaged in the construction grants
program. The increase in the Regions is partially offset by the reduction
of three Headquarters positions resulting from a series of adjustments
among the various staff offices. The net effect will be reductions in
the Administrator's Office and in the Offices of Land Use Coordination,
Public Awareness, and Regional and Intergovernmental Operations.
-------
FY1980 Total Change from FY1979
Legal Services PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Agency and Regional Management 210 6,829.3 +20 +545.5
The increase in this decision unit will provide staff for the
Offices of Regional Counsel needed to handle the substantial increase
in the legal services workload. These workload increases relate pri-
marily to construction grants and the development of State programs.
Step 3 construction grant awards, which generate most of the Region's
legal workload, are expected to increase by 35-50% in FY1980. State
NPDES programs are scheduled for revision and new SIPs are due in
1979. The permit programs under RCRA and the Safe Drinking Water
Act will also generate a substantial legal workload regardless of
whether they are delegated to the States.
FY1980 Total Change from FY1979
Management Activities PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Agency and Regional Management 1,685 59,878.6 +145 +4,699.3
Abatement and Control 172 7,445.7 +2 819.4
Research and Development 98 4,596.4 - 352.4
Enforcement 37_ 1,297.3 - -
TOTAL 1,992 73,218.0 +147 +5.871J.
The decision units covering centralized management activities which
show significant changes are summarized below:
FY1980 Change from FY1979
PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Resources Management 252 8,347.4 +4 $300.0
This increase provides four additional positions which will enable
the Financial Management Division to undertake a more intensive review
of unpaid obligations in order to increase the amounts of funds which
can be recovered and applied to new program requirements. This additional
staff will also enable FMD to respond more adequately to reports of
financial irregularities and to provide training in travel and timekeeping
procedures. The dollar increase relates to contract support for the ._
Agency's ZBB system.
Planning, Evaluation and
Analysis 146 4,199.4 +67 2,138.0
The Agency attaches very high priority to strengthening the central
analytical and management capabilities of the Regional Offices. This
increase will permit the assignment of six to eight additional positions
to each Regional Office so as to create a "critical mass" of analytical
5
-------
and managerial skills to allow each Region to participate more
effectively in Agency efforts towards regulatory and management reform
and in the integration of Federal, State, and local programs. This
new analytical talent will allow the Regional Administrators to
develop integrated strategies for stronger State environmental programs
in each Region and to tackle difficult problems requiring analytical
and project management skills (e.g., State/RA agreements and realistic
implementation strategies to deal with major urban ozone problems).
It will also strengthen existing management processes such as ZBB.
The "Regional Project Center," which is being established in FY 1979
as a model for expanded Regional analytical activities, will guide
the individual Regions in using these additional staff resources.
FY 1980 Change From FY 1979
PFT BA$(OOP) PFT BA$(000)
Planning and Evaluation 88 $2,915.3 +7 +$350.0
The staff increase in the Headquarters Office of Planning and
Evaluation will be used to provide economic and energy impact analysis
for an increased number of regulations, to develop and implement an
EPA strategy for dealing with an additional impacted industry, and to
intensify analytical work on the environmental implications of major
DOE/DOI initiatives. The increase will also provide for contract support
for analysis related to the development and review of proposed regula-
tions and management/regulatory reform projects.
FY 1980 Change From FY 1979
PFT BA$(000) PFT BA$(OOP)
Personnel Management 239 7,497.3 +19 +624.0
Seventeen of these positions will be allocated to the Headquarters
personnel staff. Thirteen are to service the currently authorized
Headquarter's complement. They will be used to expedite processing
of personnel actions, maintain an acceptable level of labor and employee
relations services, and manage Agency-wide minority recruitment programs.
The additional positions—four in Headquarters and two in the Regions—
are needed to provide personnel service for the approximately 590 new
positions requested in FY 1980. Additionally, contract funds are
required to develop policies and to implement pending civil service
reforms within the Agency.
-------
FY1980
PFT BA $(000)
Change from FY1979
PFT BA $(000)
Contracts Management
215 5,966.1 +38
+$746.0
Of this increase, eight positions are needed by the Headquarters
procurement groups to partially reduce the year-end backlog of incompleted
procurement actions. Thirty additional positions are required to
accommodate the workload caused by an NOA increase of about $79.6 million
for contracts projected for FY1980.
Administrative Management 331 9,856.8 +10
+$424.1
Nine of these additional positions are in the Office of Administration
at Headquarters. Two of these nine positions will be used to manage the
International Referral System, a part of the Library, which is to be
converted to contract operation. Another three are Headquarters investi-
gators stationed in the Regional Offices to deal with allegations of
fraud and mismanagement in Agency programs. Four positions are to serve
special needs of the Toxics program including the development of new ADP
systems and measures for safeguarding industry information submitted for
EPA review. A series of changes among the Regions in this decision unit
results in a net one position increase for ADP operations in Region V.
Program Management
Office of Research and
Development
Office of Air, Noise and
Radiation
Office of Toxic Substances
Office of Water and Waste
Management
Office of Enforcement
FY1980 Total
PFT BA $(000)
98 4,596.4
57 2,271.2
60 2,817.4
55
37
307
2,357.1
1,297.3
13,339.4
Change from FYJ979
PFT BA $(000)
+$352.4
— —*
+$819.4
+2
+2 $1,171.8
The increase in ORD provides for additional research grants for
minority educational institutions under the continuing Minority Insti-
tution Research Support program. The increase for OTS reflects an
increase in contracts as well as the annualized costs for additional
staff to be added in FY1979. The additional contracts funds will be
used for management studies aimed at more effectively integrating the
parallel activities being carried out under TSCA and FIFRA. Policy
analyses aimed at determining alternative methods for implementing
TSCA will also be undertaken via contract. Of the two OWWM positions,
one will specialize in public health issues and the other in public
participation activities.
-------
FY198Q Total Change from FY1979
Support Services PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Agency and Regional Management JL/ - 68,343.6 - 10,418.0
Abatement and Control 2/ - 1,424.8 - 181.8
Research and Development 2/ - 4,337.1 - 1,095.1
Total 74,105.5 11,694.9
Of the total amount shown above, $10.5 million is to provide OPM's
centralized services or to support the laboratories and field stations
operated by ORD and OANR. The largest portion of this amount—$9.0
million—will provide feasibility studies associated with long range
procurement of ADP equipment for 1981-90 needs; the annualized cost
of new office and laboratory space being acquired in FY1979; anticipated
increases in the cost of utilities, building services, office supplies,
and equipment; and the costs of providing regular physical examinations
for program office personnel whose duties require them to be exposed to
hazardous materials. The remaining $1.5 million is required to cover
all "nation-wide" costs in support of 590 new positions requested in
FY1980, as well as local support costs for about 390 of these positions
at locations served by 0PM.
The increase in Regional support totals $1.2 million. This will
enable the Regions to maintain the FY1979 level of service, prov*ide
physical examinations to regional laboratory personnel, and cover to
local support services for about 200 additional Regional positions
requested in FY1980.
FY1980 Total Change from FY1979
ADP Timesharing Service PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Agency and Regional Management A/ - 21,800.0 - +4,110.4
This increase provides for the additional ADP timesharing needs for
data systems which support the public water supply and groundwater
protection programs under the Safe Drinking Water Act and those which
relate to RCRA regulations. It also covers the implementation of a
system of common codes to be used by the Federal agencies concerned
with the regulation of chemicals, the data needs for health research
initiatives, and the expanded management information systems required
for ZBB, contracts, and personnel management. It also covers anticipated
cost increases in timesharing contracts.
FY1980 Total Change from FY1979
PFT BA $(000) PFT BA $(000)
Buildings and Facilities - 1,425.0 - -1,138.0
_!/ Includes Agency Support charges which are pro-rated to the A&C, R&D,
and Enforcement appropriations.
2J Includes only direct Program Support changes.
3/ Includes amounts allocated to the A&C, R&D, and Enforcement appropriations
-------
The Agency's FY1980 budget request departs from that of previous
years in that budgeting for a number of repair and improvement projects
is on a "phased" basis. Under this approach, design funds for some
projects are requested in FY1980 while requests for actual construction
funding are deferred to subsequent years. This will enable EPA to
move ahead with a number of priority projects related to employee health
and safety and pollution abatement while at the same time reducing the
request below the FY1979 level. It will also limit the relatively large
unobligated balances previously associated with this appropriation.
-------
Z Z —
a.
•- is
—I UJ Z
< ci —
— ox
Z => Z
U I <
Z Z
•z. x
s s <
z O —
» C uJ
Z CC Z
U. iT
ct>
uJ >•
CO
o
a.
a.
3
CO
d£
Z
OClQi
<
z
ooooooooooooooooooeooooooooooooooooooooooooo
mtn««ff> — :n mnj cr «*«i/>o-o-oow«j— • f\o--»~r~xco — i*>»«! o
•*! co fie cc o » •* rv ••* t> !?• > o ?\* •*>»*• x c> o-*ru'\irufvfv*u***'*»**!F'i 99 sr s* «£ ^ ^ .c *- r*- *•*•** 33
QOOOOGOOOOGOOGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGOOOQGOOGOOG
O G G C O C
GGGGGGGGCGGOO
OOGOCGGOG
i/i o •;« rvj ~i s G »•- r- r-
ccoooscecoc
r>~ —ec — • « _• o •» fi «• •«
GGOOGCOOGOOOGOC
C9SSC
— 3 nj
o- —
-* cc
coooooooocooccc
orvr-.co->~ttar*ic>.r. in o X c»
Z CO
a. •- ;
a:
Z
«
05
UJ
u
z z z
uJ UJ UJ
Z CO Z
•z
UJ
z
Z Z
JJ uJ
Z £
2 Z
aJ UJ
S- X.
I I
"z z
' e <
I Z Z
z z
UJ CO CO UJ
Z Z 'J JJ u) CJ
CO uJ UJ < LJ CJ <
u)tris>-Z'-«'-«z
(j<«'j<>>«
—zzzzzzz
> «
< CO <
Z oJ z
CO *• CO
• Z
l<
Z
I Z UJ 3 a
< Z Q. UJ
a. z
«•- I
z
Z >
<>-l
Z f
co :
uJ
Z
I
z — a.f
• uj <
: to z
J UJ
2
Z
o
CO •
> Z u f
•: 3 < =
: < u. <.
Z
Z
o —
CO —
z s
uJ 3
a. <
z —
P 3Z
U Z
< •"
u- U.
• a. E
I 3 O
z > :
UJ
CO •,
uz •
Z •" i
3 Z .
3 Z •
co « :
I Oj -J '
z a. i
z to a z
a. — uj z -a
3 C' O O 3
I I I I I
>-»-»-»- t-
Z Z 2 Z Z
O O Z Z Z Z Z
»«M.i>uJUJUJCOuJ
t-"*—crcsutsuJtr cz
UJuJZZZZ—2 Z
ZZ««««[>««
— "-ZZZZZZZ
O O uJ
Z Z Z Z CO £ Z
uuzzzz_jtrz
~— CS'JJiS-J« ••« «rt V4 •!« •« vrt •• vrt VH ••• V v« KM VM ••« f\J fVJ fV f\J ftj ^VJ f\J t\l fV 'Xf (\l f\J *•• *^ ^" fV 'V 'V ^V !\f fU f\3 f\J 'V
GGGGOOOG9GGOGGOGGOOGGOGGGGGOGGGGGOGGGGGOGGGG
3— 33333333O3«-333«-32
xaczrrirrxiizzxiLizzr
•33«-—33—«-3333— — >->-33333333
xizzxxzzzxxxzzzzxrxzxxx '
i » -n ^ JS x <»•
> an -c * « » IT
i ji rsj -^ — ji -v -M
Z Z I Z Z Z Z
OOGGGGGOGGOGGGGGG9GOOOGOGGOGGOGOGGOGGGGGOGGO
-------
u
z
«- 05
U UJ uJ
UJ ~ -J
»- 3 X
_l UJ Z
« a •-
>- a it
2 3 Z
UJ (T <
Z a:
r tc
3 Z «
a: o —
o
UJ
a.
a.
03
o
z
U CV
z
u
z
^
"> u.
a.
Z X
Z!
-«oo — « — — rv •w ~> o
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooeeoooo
-« — • rvi in m •« fi
i *> tn
00000
• »•••
in nj si •« »
cs ococoooceo oocooooooo c
• • • ••••••••• • ••••••••• •
o* -«9-sr^Ki«otnKi*o- .oinsT3D.o.c»f— t-* r-
CO
to«
CO
CO
CO
CO
05
CO
UJ
£ CO
a. uj
o —
i >-
£. U
UJ «
«o
UJ ««
a Z «e
UJ <
O5 Z O5
I- Z Z
*y ^ ^^
a. -H a -i
a. o o -<'
3 n z a
en < a. x
»J «
« 3
u. -I
«
•« »
UJ
05 •
U U
z z
*-• »-4
a z
O5
Z
a
•u
i
a.
3
I
o c
at a:
D O
I I
OL S.
z z
«. s .
S O i
I I
z z
UJ UJ I
UJ Z
s Z O
1 O5 UJ •-*
• UJ C2 *—
CO _I
> UJ < .
z u
3 Z !
D < •
CO Z .
> < z
' Z Z H4
z z
I UJ UJ
UJ U
IS (S
z z
UJ UJ
i Z
UJ UJ
IS IS
z z
UJ UJ
z a
UJ «I I
a z i
z z
< «
z z
z z
z z
< «
z z
z z
i a o _j
: uJ Z O
_ia. a.
a: a:
a a
o o
a: z
a. a.
a: z
-j a
o o
z a:
a. a.
z z
<
Z 05
t-
Z u
< <
a: z
a >-
O z
z c
B. U
z z
4lJ UJ
z z
uj uj
a a
> 4 <
Z Z
< <
z z
z
O Z
n. «
. z
=>
CO UJ
>
«* "^
z
UJ
a
Z O5 »-
UJ <
>•••- —1UJ UJ I
•-" > a < z z s
*-EE Z
Z Z
2 Z
O O
05 05
z z
z eo
*-
CO t—
CO «
UJ >
I 1 ^y
UJ UJ «
«zzzzz=>o
j.<«<««az
uJXXTXXuJ<
• 05 0} 05 05 to 05
zzzzzz — z
z
uJ
z
uj
a —
< z
Z yj
< Z
z uj
a
UJ « CO
> 2 uJ <
«-> Z _J
Z O
i ~a.
z a.
o z
z a. z
«a.a.a.a.a.a.«
_)OOCsOS3_)
a.««<< z
UJ
CO »_i
uj a uj
U Z Z
a: « 3
s z ~
S Z CO
to < z
UJ _J UJ
z a. a.
.U.U.U.U.U.U-U.U.U.U.U-I
iroocrsooocoi
.U-U.U.U-U-U.U.U.U.U.tl.U~U»U-U.U.U.U.U.U_u.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:
sr » ^ in sn a^
o o o o o o
t-3333l-33«-33S^33S33B3>-3 — 33'-«-3—3333333333>-3>-33
zxxxxzxxzxxxzxxxxxxxzxzixazxzxxxxxxxxxxzxzzi
-" ^ ^ = O -t ?•
in ^ in x GO *o **i
: z .
• s
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzzzzzzzxz
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o.o o o o o
0011
-------
U uJ u.
JJ - _)
— 2 X
C uj <
Z Z •-
2 ± Z
uJ S <
£ Z
2 S
O £ «
> O ,
2 X
*J O-
OC12
F a.
a.
\ f\l r\l r\J *\1 ^
C^OOOOOOOOOOOOOC
ooooocccoooooooo
ocooooooooaoooocoooooooc
X •*!
IT
coo
• • •
-« .M —
nj *• f\j f\j
O- S* —•a>o-
r\j r\j •**•••
S O O O C O O -
• •••••»
COC5CSOOOC
SSCC.SCC
iT 0-
ryj —
CO
UJ
UJ
BC.
X
CO
to
CO CO
CO CO
CO
CO
•z.
UJ
2 « 222
o^ 2 uJ *j^ oJ
£ « £ £ Z
2 2 « r 2
UJ C 2 C! S
£ M « MM
ZCOCO22ULJUCO^-U22>-
RV
Z
U
<
2
' UJ CO
i > UJ
I M U
2 —
c «
M Z>
M *- M UJ >
: Z tr
; •- UJ
i CO CO
I ~! _)
—< «
T ^
i c jj
C U
2
2
— 2
2
Ori
£
uJ
19
«
Z
<
£
CO
o
tf
z •
2
I 3
U
£
eo
MID
HES
HESOUHC
FAtlLIl
i CO Z 2
"• jj « a:
T 7 7 7
•- ^* >— »- ^
2 2 Z 2 _1
.U uJ uj u. <
£ £ £ £ »
UJ *^< UJ UJ CO CO aJ
U> IT a IS UJ LL
< « « < U U C
2 Z Z 2 M -. 2
«<<«>><
£ £ £ £ Z a
— u.' !£
£ £ £ £ to to 2
« « < < M
Z Z Z Z _l_l 2
•J i» ^ a « < 2
3 ~> •"• T; -i a «
Z Z Z Z UJ jj _J
a. a. a. a. _i _i a.
o:
' 2
O
L MGMI-R
SERVICES
FINANC
SUPPUR
I
*-
2
UJ
UJ
a «-
« cr .
z & '
«
£ tn
u.1 '
£ U i
< Z c
* = :
5 to :
f jj
a. z <
CO
«u
I U
RV
a.
CL
S
x«xxo-».^i — — « .
ccc^oor c^oococ^^
oooooooooooooooo
i J1 W J^ X X «
1n^*in-cttj:=ro-C'r^»r'ir-O'^X!T,
SOOOOOO-SO — OO3OCOSOO
i in — 3 L"
' O — => O
rxzz^zz riirzxxzz
•V'^'^Z'^'n-n— — ^'^-•C'Vj'VJ —
fif*fiJififififlfiJ\fifiS>fif*J\
zzzzx-rzzzzzzz-rz-r
O'O — •Vl'^SJ^-O'^XO-C' — "U-^S
xs-o-yoys-o-s-ys-sooos
ooooooooooo-* — — —• —
-------
_ jj 2
« -J —
2 i
D Z
X <
Z
X
s «
X O ~
> = JJ
z » r
jj o
3 —
U i.
o
o
J ^
Z u-
a.
3 ?»-«r-.r-s>rvi»-*-'C.O5rr^r^:t>f~
b b— — ^^^^^. — ^-om-oa ^^
OSSOOC3OOCCCOOOOCO
*-*-«^^-*\j«'l^ ^3•5•^^»^•Pw^.^t^O
ocooocosooooocooo
f. s-»-«-.«*(\i««-'O'-O'•
— -i
Z -Z 2
oj uJ <
uj uj «* yJ UJ uJ
— 3 "- -J — -.«,«-«
z i -r-
£ 2 O.<£« -I_ICV_I
— — « IO u^ CT, j, < J < « 1C « CO —
u. jj i « e >-£.» •£•< «e — uj
a. a. u
ir> ac r»
u. U. U.
• O C C C
o cooc:
OG13
-------
u
z
o •-
»"• I—I
*- z
O *- 3
bJ co
*•" UJ 2
O 3 O
or o ~
CL bJ CO
CE •-
_J U
« »- bJ
•- UJ O
2 (S
uj o >•
X 3 CD
Z CD
O •-
CE CD CO
M Z UJ
> O 3
2 C
UJ O bJ
CD CE
CO O-
« >• IS
»- b. O
CO 3
1C
c
bJ
CE O- W
o r-
yj Cf1
U V I O
«-£C O t-
<_> CO V.
z o- bJ
o
O UJ
» CO CE »-
) O- O
UJ V.
U bJ
O l-
o
o
o
bj^-
CO
C*> bJ
: O- i-o
UJ >v
ff km I
CE »-
in
I
-c
o-
in
in
i
in
i
r>
in
a
ru
in
i
in
i
o-
in
a
o-
co
o-
CD
O O
cc cc
o e
ru ru
CD CO
o- o
a a
ru ru
o
•
o
o
•
a
a
ru
•fi
ru
in in m
KI KI ru ni KI KI cc
CD CD ru ru o o o
_ _ fu
•f -o -c ~t> co ru
• • • • • • •
CO CD Kl Kl CD
ru ru ~« «^ a a f»>
» • • • • • •
^» »•- in in — -« a
ni ru KI KI CD co a
ru ru ru ru ru ru »-
o o r^ r** ^ f*- a
• • • • • • »
^* r*. o o tn in KI
»- ^- ^ »>. « -c «
ru
o o o o e o o
• • • • • • •
^ r*» in in o o ru
m in tn in * -a r-
ru ru — — o c KI
• • • • • • »
»• — ^» r*. co CD o
i— t- in in o o- ru
ru ru KI KI o- o- •*>
ru ru ru ru •* *^ o
r» r- in in c a -tt
CD co co co m in ru
•o -o « « in in e-
a a a a e e co
cc B «~ — a a KI
a a in in tn in in
c-
ru
o-
ru
o o
• •
Kl Kl
O- O-
n. ru
a a
a a
O-
ru
a
a
o
r».
o-
r«
in
ru
a
•o
tn
•o
in
CE
C
I
«t en
Z IT
Q. X H- Z
CE
•o o 3 a.
•DIC O-
CE
Z
o c c
III
z
bJ
bJ
O
•c co
z CE
z •-
CE
: co
: CE
: uj
•e. co
z CE
«t UJ
z i-
CE
z <
a: o _i a: o _j ceo
cs o « o c < uo
O< H- O< >- O<
CEUJ O CEbJ D Or UJ
d-X •— Q.I t- O.X
in I
ru
CE
o o
•O X
ru
CE
KIO
•O X
ru
CE
Z
CE
CL
CL
bJ
O
I
t-
2
UJ
z
bJ
U
< CO
Z CE
«t UJ
z >-
CE
< 3
CE O _1
cs o «
o < •-
CE UJ C
CL X •-
O- O 3
•OX C
Z
CE
CL
CL
CO
UJ
u
b.
co
•C CE
bJ
CO *-
U CE
•- 3
Q CS _l
_1 O <
(-4 < H-
3 bJ O
CD X t-
o o
CC X
a
CE
3
O
-------
>
2
bJ
O
O t-
** »-»
>- z
0 »- 3
U co
i- iu Z
O 3 O
a c «-
CC M
_l «J
« t- bJ
>- u o
z cs
uj o >•
I 3 ID
Z CD
a »-
CC CD to
t-t ^ bJ
> O 3
Z C
UJ O UJ
CO CC
CO O
bj -« i-
»— uj
«t >- 0
•- u, o
CO 3
C
o
bJ
Z
<
Z
cc
u.
cc
0
a.
O.
3
CO
•e
^
2
iu
31
U
O
<
z
<
z
u
z
bJ
cs
•*t
~
o
o
••*
cc o- m
u r~
bj o
»•» o ** *~
U x. 1 O
U CO X
Z O bJ
u.
_
u.
CL
"X.
UJ
0
0
o
UJ W
c
O UJ
« » a: *~
SD ^ O
UJ X.
o »-
O U.
1C
»-
a
u
^
^
^*
o
o
bJ *•*
H-
< •>
r
1-1
*-
CO
C- yj
^ *••• H-
« O- *— O
*^ _ r *-
EC UJ
a *-
=>u.
u
I—
fc.
Nk
£
k.
UJ
j
H-
|H4
^>
C
u
o
o
o
0 t- OJ 0-
in
— ftl 0 —
— cu
f'A ?*• O
in 9 o
in «o K)
r» 0 -o
CC K1 CU
- ru cu in
o in 9 o
Kt O h- ^-
•C Kl K( -C
m o cu cu
« « » *
cu cu >c o
— ni
o ^ ^
ey nj •*
Kt ft *
0 O- 0-
*. «c r^
o o o
ft fW IT*
2
0
•^
^
c> - 3 Z
•- O 3 O —1
C i-i O •-• <
O U l«U O
Z Q. I Ct •-
cc
iv K> es *- 3
CL O X CC O
< in
cc
o
o
o
Kl
o
A
,
•
0
*••
1
9
f-
9
Kl
«
•C
0-
cu
o
cu
in
IU
9
,*.
9
O
^
CD
in
cc
o
tu
9
O
9^
ru
*—
ca to
£ cc
u
uj cc
u <
CC 3
0 0
UJ UJ
cc ^
"• a
Kl I
in
cc
o
o
o
Kl
o
w
•
co
•P4
1
9
f-
9
KS
«
*
CU
o
ru
in
cu
9
^
9
O
^
CO
ir>
CC
o
»V1
9
O
fh.
CU
_I
4
o
t—
3
o
o o cu ru o o
CO CO t~ I- O O
KI KI co CD m in
— •« Kt Kl
CU CU
f»- »- O O »»l Kl
CD CO •• -• -. «.
in in •« —
cc CD in in o o
• • 1 I « «
tn in
IT9O K1K1 ^.^ c>
99 — -. r- r~ co
o cc CD KI KI in in in
O CO 3 O C « « CD
KI 9 o o ru ni m
OCD
o— — cu ru in in co
m«-»^ mm ^^ o
— oo r- t- «n in m
* » » » « « «
~* CU ** •* *^- ?*- CD
O«-« K
3 1- IU
_) Z
•C CO (S O 1C CO
> CC Z 2 CC C
bJ UJ «c bJ UJ
»H- _l K- >-
CS CC « (9 CC CC
Z « 10 •-!«> Z« «
•i3Z (JZ *«3 3
zoo _i zo _» ZCB _i t- a
_) UJ UJ O •- UJ O _I bJ O 3ia
CLXCC *» U.QT *"• CL.X ^ ^X
KIO»- 3 ^»- 3 OO 3 «nO
Kixa O K1BC O KIX O 9X
in in in in
cc cc cc cc
9 O
O 9
*• 4
i m
-oin
ru o-
*"
o -a
& ^
v^
CD in cc
. 9CU
cTI
— —
CO
UJ
u m
ii CC
cc ^
UJ CC
3 Z
-1 _l 0 O
•- _l X CE
3 CO O »-
O 9 X CC
in
cc
in
in
9
in
-*
cu
ru
•c
cu
ru
Kl
CO
*
o-
o
Kl
-C
^
e^
cu
CD
Kl
OD
CU
^
cc
CO
fw
0
-,
CO
_l
^~
o
3
o
I
o
o
OC15
-------
V
u
z
bJ
O
<
Z
o »-
••* *•*
»- z
0 •- 3
Ul CO
«- Ul Z
O 3 O
or O •-
ft 1. 1 |0
CE •—
_l U
« •- UJ
»- Ul O
Z U
uio x
Z 3 CD
Z 1C
o »-
CE CD co
••* Z Ul
>• O 3
z c
Ul O Ul
CO IE
«o cr
U) ** ^
^ UJ
« >- cs
•- U. O
CO 3
O
Ul
_
Z
r* "* "*
W — «-
J
«
*
*
^ *
*
3T *
cr «
o *
Ik. *
*
*K
*
*
*
*
4
*
«
«
*
«
*
*
*
«
4T,
*
• *
Z «
Ul «
CS «
^ ^
—
- t-
w ^.
19 Ul
O »-
CD
^
O.
V
Ul
U.
•^
o
o
io~
z
^>
CO
0- Ul
«< O1 ^- O
«- — z t-
Ul V
CE Ul
CE •-
3 U.
U.
o.
•x.
Ul
U.
Ul
^ J
^
•^
3
0
Ul
o
o
o
er o cr o o
O 9 9 0 O
o cr cr KI KI
ir> — *
e — —
V* w
o in in o e
KI ru in KI KI
— * er o in tn
ru r^-
Kl Kl
Kl Kl
ru ru
c o
cr er
v» •«
•" in * o o
ru co o KI KI
— er — ru ru
t* ^. •» •*
9 r- ru
Kl Kl
Kl Kl
ru ru
o o
o- o-
^
CL
O
1
r-
z
CO UJ
Ul Z
O Ul
" tS
>• CO < CO
IE CE Z CE
Ul Ul < Ul
CO t- Z H-
CE E
•- < CO I <
CE 3 Z •< 3
O O O _l (E O _l
CL < t» t- O < t-
3 Ul Ul O CC Ul O
«0 X £E •- CL X •-
— « O t- 3 9 CS 3
in x CE o tn x c.
in in
£E CE
O 0
0 9
in r-
9 -•
cr co
• •
0 9
9
«•
— C
• •
9 ru
— ru
o r-
rvj r.
ru ru
in ru
-c ru
o- »^
0 —
9 ~-
»« O
Kl Kl
9 er
VH
-• ru
0 Kl
r- o
f- —
f^ 9
co ru
•a —
ru —
o o
ru cr
—
^<
z
Ul
z
Ul
o
<
z
< CO
Z CE
Ul
J >—
Ul CE
Z < CO
Z 3 Z
000
CE < C9
Ul Ul Ul
a. x CE
ru o *—
r- x tr
in
CE
O
9
ni
-0
P^
•
tn
9
•*
••
•
-t>
Kl
^
cr
9
r^
co
f
ru
in
•*
•o
Kl
ru
Kl
Kl
r»
CO
—
_
CO
Kl
O
O
ru
cu
-J
o
r—
3
O
O
•C
9
r-
9
•
•O
Kl
in
• •
Kl
Kl
„
•a
•c
cr
in
«
CO
ru
ru
•o
CD
O
ru
—•
e
ru
ru
ru
ru
er
in
"
*
ru
ru
0
cr
cr
^
•*
9
O
C?
in
ru
m
ru
ru
in
er
_>
o
*~
3
O
cr ru
* r*
r- 9
Kl
— O
* »
O »•
— 1
f~ O
f m
CD —
1
r~ —
KIKl
in o
* Kl
m -o
r^ —
cr KI
— ru
r- e
9 «
^ ^
^ v«
co cr
•oin
r- in
O Kl
•0 Kl
9 •£
r~ «u
CO Kl
«-ru
o o
in •c
^
z
Ul
z
Ul
U
z
z
UJ
•-no
>- CE
< Ul
IE >-
*- CE
CO •« CO
i-i3 Z
zoo
Z « (9
O UJ Ul
<. X CC
r* o ^~
f"- X CE
in
CE
-»
9
ru
9
v^
v
er
r-
m
f^
CD
*
in
CD
cr
—
er
ru
9
f-
O
Kl
Kl
r»
ru
Kl
9
er '
o
0
ru
9
O
fU
Kl
_l
h-
O
3
O
9
O
v.
—
9
O
O
e
CD
^,
ru
•*
er
CD
*
^
u
CE CO
< CC
X Ul
CO 1-
U1CE
Z «
»• 3
>- o
a. «
C Ul
< X
< o
CC X
in
a:
9
O
VM
-•
9
0
O
O
co
—
ru
•C
cr
as
*
£
_
-i
^
0
3
C
O
in
ru
Kl
ru
ru
f^
m
o
K>
p*.
^
••
9
ru
•o
tn
«t
CD
in
in
-c
»
Kl
—
^
tr
Kl
ru
ru
.1
Kl
CD
-
v«
CD
9
in
CD
ru
9
in
m
ru
ru
^t
^
•-
O
z
CE
CL
0.
-------
>-
u
z
uj
e
^
z
o
l-f
V-
tj
UJ
*-
c
a
a.
_j
«
*-
z
UJ
I
z
c
IX
**
>
z
UJ
CO
UJ
*-
<
*—
en
o
UJ
f—
»«
Z
3
">-
CO
UJ
2
o
UJ
or
H-
UJ
cs
0
3
CC
cc
r
o
0
CO
t>
•M
>-
u.
^~
*-
z
3
z
0
(M
CO
*-
u
u
o
>•
m
*-
CO
UJ
3
O
UJ
a
»—
u
ts
o
s
£
<
I
tr
C
u.
*-
cr
o
OL
(X
^
CO
•e
H-
z
UJ
z:
UJ
u>
<
z
<
z
>•
o
z
UJ
C5
<
«
«
~ «
o
o
0
^^
cc o •>
O K
u o-
» C M »-
OVID
w o: o »-
u to v
Z O UJ
•«H ^« >—
u.
>-
u.
B.
•V.
UJ
*-
u.
^^
o
o
o
1^ ^^
CO
UJ tfi
3
o
O UJ
~ to or *-
DO O
^•* *•• ^- ^
UJ V
o uj
Q »-
=> U-
CC
^
u.
a.
V
UJ
*-
u.
-^^
o
o
o
UJ •-
^
< «
I
••4
*-
CO
o ui
•» r- t-
< o- *- o
~ — z •-
UJ V
cc uj
ZC •-
=>u.
u
H-
U.
a.
v
U;
*-
U.
UJ
_J
>-
»*
»-
ri
a
UJ
0
c
o
cc
•
cc
IT
to
ru
(XI
0
•
«
C\J
Kl
9
•
IT
in
•i*
•et
m
O
«VI
0-
»
CO
o
*«
cc
•
9
tn
«
_
•
ST
0
^>
^
ru
cc
•
V.
*
tn
^
•o
t^
CO
•
r-
^q
(VI
Kl
r«-
•
o-
9
in
^
nj
_>
<
^
o
>-
<
»«i
o
UJ
x:
-------
(C
I.
cc
c
u.
>fc
tj
z
e
<
z
0 «-
*- z
01-3
uj co
I— UJ Z
O 3 O
CL UJ CO
CC *->
_) U
1- UJ O
z cr
UJ 0 >-
r 3 IB
Z CD
O 1—
cc CD en
>• O 3
Z O
UJ O UJ
CO CC
to »
UJ — 1—
1— UJ
«t >- ts
t~ u. O
CO 3
z
Q
UJ
z
cc
o
o.
CL
3
m
t«
z
UJ
I
UJ
is
^J
z
z
>.
o
z
UJ
W L/ v. -• ^
#^
« 0
« 0
o
**
a t> •>
CJ (*•
UJ O-
*•* c —
C X. 1 *-
*-" cr o u.
O *D CL.
Z O1 O
»•* •"
U.
a.
o
o
t— o
tu
o
^» O UJ
u cc cc
*" Sit-
es U-
O CL
3 0
CC
u.
a
c
e
o
i—
« w
y
»-«
fr—
CO
t> UJ
CD t> *- u.
w — z o_
UJ O
cc
cc
3
U
^
li_
CL
.^»
O
O
S. f •—
*I o I— l»
*_
o.
u.'
~J
»•*
^
^
o
UJ
o
c
tJ)
9
•
|\j
tft
r*»
a-
^
o-
IT)
O
O
^
a
•c
t>
VI
a*
o
^
•^
c
cc
«>
c
s*
sy
IM
a
o
•c
w«
o
• •
e
o
e
e
c
e
a
o
t>
o
_j
<
»—
3
>—
3
C
a
•
IM
in
Kl
a
«
o
in
a
o
«
^
e
CO
e>
o
a
a
IM
a
o
o
v«
o
• •
CO
l>
o
0
0
0
a
e
t>
o
•J
»_
o
*•»
z
cc
CL
O.
<
•M
_
f^
IM
ni
o
a
v»
o
^.
m
•M
_
r-.
IM
IM
O
a
— «
o
•
f^
m
o
CO
o
cc
rvi
o
r-.
in
cc
z
^
o
1
z
UJ
z
UJ
< CO
z cc
< UJ
Z 1—
Cc
I <
cc 5
u c
o «
QT UJ
0. I
r- a
in i
IM
CC
o
•
•••
i
o
fM
IM —
— f-
1^ lyi
IM Kl
IM Al
C C
a —
W4 ••
O O
r^ m
in in
IM —
— F-
r- in
IM Kl
ru IM
0 O
a IM
» • *•
o o
• •
^* Kl
in in
O 0
as —
o •«
CO Kl
IM IM
0 0
r- m
in in
X.
x
3
c
1
z
UJ
1.
UJ
u
< CO
z ce
< UJ
Z fr-
CC
z i
_t cc 3
< ca o
•- o <
o cc u
i- £L Z
3 0(3
(M
CC
a
•
o-
w«
CD
O O
• •
-• Kl
1
0
IM
— a
!•- »-
in —
Kl CO
IM IM
e o
» a
9W
O O
in o
in -o
— o
r- co
in o
Kl t>
IM —
e o
IM —
•H
O 0
• • " • .
Kl ©
in «
o o
— CO
— IM
Kl IM
IM —
o o
m a
in IM
CO
»~
D
1
Z
UJ
I
UJ
u
<[ CO
z cc
« UJ
I t-
cc
I <
_) cc a
f (SO
t- O <
C EC U.'
•- Q. Z
3 Kl 13
O * X
IV
CC
a
•
»
— •
CD
O
•
Kl
a
^
—^
CD
IM
O
a
o
o
•ft
o
co
(^
o
_
e
„
o
•
o
•*>
o
CO
IM
IM
—
O
a
IM
_>
fr—
O
*-
3
C
a
•
t>
— «
CO
o
•
IM
o
IM
r-
ir
jy
a
i>-
o
e-
CM
f>
IW
f-
Kl
•e
IM
•c
•D
0
t~
IM
0
•
O
r*
—i
o
I*-
Kl
a
•e
o
o
— '
»»•
c
z
cc
O-
O-
«(
Kl Kl
<•» t^
t> 0-
IM IM
« ^
O O
m in
o o
*- i»-
Kl Kl
Kl Kl
r- r^
o t>
IM IM
^ ^
»
O O
m in
0 0
• • •
r- »^
Kl Kl
O O
O O
e e
o- t>
o e
m in
Kl Kl
UJ
0
1
z
UJ
r.
u
u
< CO
z cc
* UJ
Z 1—
cc
I <
CE CS J
00 <
o < »-
cc uj c
a. z i-
0-0 3
•C I C
Kl
CC
o o
• •
CO »
Kl
O O C
O — —
o e c
o- e c
- -
c
in
Kl
co
UJ
*•
^J
»M
u
^
u.
CO
•e cc
u.
C^ fr*
U CC
—1 Z <
*~ S CJ _l
0 _l O <
3 UJ O
z m z i-
cc
CL e o 3
Q. 00 Z C
< a
cc
-------
ffi
IT
u.
>-.
tj
z
z
O t-
«•* 1-1
- 3
UJ 09
*— uj z
O 3 O
or c *~*
a. uj in
cr ~
_J U
«C *— «J
!—• m ^
Z IS
UJ O >-
I 3 OE
Z CD
O H-
or m co
» Z UJ
> O 3
2 O
UJ C UJ
oo or
10 O-
ui — • *-
H- UJ
>- u. o
05 3
X
c
UJ
z
~~
,_
or
0
0.
o.
3
CO
•e
f-
2
UJ
3C
UJ
u
«c
z
«I
^
u
UJ
o
^
~
0
0
or e> *»
c? *-
ID t>
o v. i t-
LJ OD G.
Z O- O
U.
O.
O
»- o
o» •-
UJ
3 OS
o
^ O UJ
u oo or
^ c-
^* ^
UJ •-
cs u.
O 0.
3 0
B
U.
C_
e
o
0
UJ **
*—
-c •*
r
•M
*-
03
t> U)
«»•» f*. **—
X> ty- »- j,±.
^" — Z G.
UJ O
tt
CC
s
*->
»*-
tu
Q_
-— «.
O
O
-J C
*x> < *-
«C i> H- *9
^^ — u
<<
&
IA-
-1
^
f-
O
UJ
io
c
u
o r- rv
o:" -Inn
Kt <>T Kl
— _ .«
*-> •••*
1
O
rn
o o
Kt a
i «~
in AI o
ru *- r-
9 — Kl
•h ik *•.
— MO-
• ^
O O
• •
O- IT.
a r-
o o
•o ru
oo a
ru ru
o in a
KI o r-
•C Kt Kl
in o ru
^ « »
ru ru co
*-
o o
• •
* tn
a p*»
e o
O- Kl
oo ru
ru AJ
o in o
— r- o
o in o
o <«o m
* » »
^ o ^
'O O
mo-
ru ru
z
0
»-«
>»
U CO
UJ or
Or UJ
•—I H»
C or
_i < m
•< >- 3 Z
»— u 3 o
o >-. o •*
o uj u:
z o. x or
or
O. Kl O 1-
o. o x or
•< in
or
o- o
a o
r-» o
ru KI
J^
0 0
KI ru
"
o o
•c a
oo a
ru r-
a a
in KI
^ »
— • oo
ru
0 0
• •
a ru
ru KI
•••
0 0
CD ru
ru in
in ru
o- a
r- r-
-c a
ru o
« ^
O CD
ru
O 0
• •>
-• O
ru ru
v«
c o
ru CD
•« a
m ru
in o
r»- o
in -c
— 0-
^ ^
r^ in
o o
a o
in ru
H-
C9 05
r or
UJ
o> »-
uj ar
u <
or 3
< O O
o uj uj
•- or x
3 — O
C Kl X
in
or
o
o
o
Kl
0
ru
"
e>
9*
a
£
Kt
^
OC
o
•
ru
1*1
o
in
ru
a
r*
a
o
^
03
O
•
e
ru
o
00
a
ru
o
o
•o
o-
^
in
o
o
ru
_)
<
o
f—
o
o
o
OD
Kl
ru
o
ru
o
^
"*
o a
o o-
in a
»• o
^
a
0
•
fw
o o
a
—
o a
c —
m —
— o-
^
««
e
«
m
o o
•45 Kl
fi»
e
o
CO
o
^
«•«
00 0
CO »-
J
•X
z
«c
mt
z
O
**
^
<
3
_i
< «0
» or
UJ UJ
•t ^»
o or
z < o>
•-4 3 Z
Z 0 O
-J UJ UJ
o. x a:
Kl O ^>
KI x or
in
or
o ru
oc *-
Kl 00
ru
0 0
ru —
o
^
•t>
a o-
0- 0-
O Kl
— CD
^ 4k
a — •
O 0
• 4>
r- o
^it
o o
a OD
a *•-
>• ru
•c on
o r~
^ «
ru —
0 0
• •
in o-
0 0
c> o
r- CD
0 O
e o
CD ru
O Kl
^ ^
•*• «"
o e
i- *~
CO
z
o
*vl
C5
UI
or
I
^~
r
C9
I
•
4(
•o CO
u z
_I Z O
O x UJ
i- u. or
3 O «-
o KI or
in
or
ru
^
OD
0
„
O-
o-
Kl
OD
^
«M
O
•
O
«M
O
(O
r~
ru
in
^
«•
o
•
o-
*>
-c
00
o
e
ru
Kl
^
«-
O
^
0
o
•—
3
o
o
e
in
Kl
O
Kl
O
,J
Kl
tn
o-
^
•«.
o
•
f^
ru
o
OD
Kt
in
•c
tn
^
««.
c
4>
a
ru
o
_
CD
0
C
OD
Kl
^
*
O
in
*""
z
o
H-
4£
^
_l
>
UI
o co
Z (C
< UJ
u or
z <
•-t 3
z a
z o
_l UJ
0, X
0- 3
Kl X
in
or
o
o
in
Kl
o
Kl
O
.J
Kl
O-
^
p*.
o
•
^.
ru
o
03
00
Kl
*n
•0
m
^
p*
c
•
a
ru
o
^
00
o
o
IT
Kl
fc
•e
c
in
^"
_i
o
^~
^
0
OD 00
0- 0-
in in
•> 4t
OC OD
0 O
• •
Kl Kl
^* ••
O O
o c
— M
OS 00
OD cc
p. o-
in in
^ ^
00 OD
0 O
• flk
Kl Kt
«M ••
O O
e o
•4 4M
4« •«
O O
e o
ru ru
o o
00 00
o o
o- o-
o o
CO
or
UJ
t—
a.
^
»- 3 — 1
3 UJ O
in e 3
ax Q
in
or
a o in
o- a in
— -D a
• in in
O 0
ru ru
o o
o o
ru ru
in CD KI
o- KI ru
Kl 0 00
••> *J>> «k
a ru •£
o o o
• • •
•D *• r-
v« *M
CO O
r^ KI o
ru as —
— ru
o- o- cc
in r*- KI
— -C CD
a OD ru
«h tX Ob
a — *
0 O 0
• • •
« o- m
^.
o e o
r* KI c
ru -e o-
~* ~*
O 0 C
Kl »- O
00 — O
ru •« o-
Kl — S
s
eo e
a- r* «o
c- m m-
m
UJ
u to
I** SK
> UJ
or »-
ui tc.
CO < 05
3 Z
U < U >-
uj uj uj c
_i x a: t-
os O •- 3
a x tr c
in
or
03
r~
i
I
o-
o
oc:?
-------
>•
l_>
2
Ul
U
Z
0 •-
t- 2
Ul- 3
UJ CO
»- UJ Z
O 3 O
D. Ul CO
tr •-•
_l U
^ *- Ul
>- UJ O
Z CS
UJ O >•
Z 3 CD
Z CC
o *-
CC CO CO
»Z UJ
> D 3
2 O
UJ O Ul
CO CC
CO tr
Ul -. t-
t- Ul
« >- ts
t- u. o
CO 3
X
o
Ul
z
Of ; r
V-* ^
cc
z
CC
C
u.
^
cc
C
a
0.
3
CO
ft
^•
2
UJ
X
UJ
(5
^
2
^
Z
>
2
->uj
->c»
*^ «
0 *
o «
o *
^ *
cc cr « «
u t- *
U) O- «
^ o — *
O -x 1 t- «
*•* CC O U. *
u co a. *
z o- o «
*
:
to. «
a «
*
«
o «
0 «
»- o *
CO v 41
UJ *
3 •» *
o «
.-. 0 UJ «
O CO CC *
'— O- «
•» H- «
(2 U. «
C O. «
3 O *
tc «
*
41
4r
*- *
U. *
a. *
41
41
4
A
«
«
c 41
o 41
o «
IU •— *
f *
4 W 41
X. *
•4 «
H- *
CO «
tr u> *
^"* i*> >— 41
CO C- ^- U. *
uj o *
EC «
CC «
3 «
U «
4E
•— 41
U. 4t
0, 41
J
«
-". «
O «
O 41
JO*
CC « «- «
~r~ 3 4c
« o- »— *» *
»* — «J «
H- «
U. «
0. «
41
*
4;
«
4C
41
41
4t
4E
41
41
41
4C
41
41
41
41
41
41
IU «
J *
t- 4t
1-4 41
^ J
3 *
0 *
IU 41
O 41
o «
o «
41
o- o
• •
O 9
0 0-
in -•
O "
— *
o in
KI ru
-4 tr
ru cc
^ fc
in cc
•o
— 4n
CW (T
•- c-
<*» «D
Cfc Ch
9 *-
ir
O 0
o o
-A e
IV Kt
Cfe Ck
*C fw
in
CO
UJ
^)
1*4
>• to
cc cc
Ul UJ
CO t-
or
fc- < tO
tr 3 z
o a o
D. O *•«
0. < U>
3 UJ IU
co x ce
— a >-
in x c
in
cc
CT 00 00
• • • • •
9 CO O 9
tr KI KI in r-
4 9 —
J^
•M
O O
o- ru
cc
o o
r- ru
^
in c- o ~*AJ
in f* i*» o ^»
o in in m r*-
— .£ «*
9 m «v
P*.
0 O O O
K^ f>n »*~r^
CO —
•M
O O 0 O
• • • *
C^ C^ • ^) *^
— — 90-
w.
« o o — ru
O Kl Kl O Kl
—• ru ru r- o
9 O -a r~ —
* » ^
ru 9 ru
•a
o o o o
• • • •
KI KI coin
0 O O O
• " * «" •
- o* e> o^ —
— *M ru o-
CP«
o o o o o
O O O O Kl
•* ^cC ^ O •*•
in m in o cu
^ ^ «.
KV 9 At
4)
o e o o
• • • •
•-*•-* t\t f*-
«~ — -
1 Z
*- UJ
z z
iu U)
£ O)
IU «
IS Z
«C CO « CO
z
3
C
0
•
go
9
*"
O
ru
o
CO*
*"
-
<0
«
cr
^
in
0
9
vi
O
»
m
M
ru
•"•
o
ru
ru
«
in
c
•
ru
o
• •
r*.
^.
VH
o
o
^
in
^
9
O
•
•D
•£>
•M
-f-
Z
IU
z
IU
C9
<
2
< CO
z cc
IU
CO »-
•- cc
U <£
< 3
C CS
z <
C IU
U 3;
sr e
^ X
in
cc
o
e
43
9
*~
O
ru
o
CO
***
-
•o
43
tr
c^
in
0
9
w«
O
«
in
•M
ru
•*
e
ru
ru
*
in
o
•
ru
o
a
r-
r-
»*
o
o
43
in
^
9
O
•
^
•D
*•
J
t—
D
H»
3
C
O
„
•C
9
O
O
^
tn
o
tr
o
•
tr
tr
^
«
9
O
O
»
in
0
•
cc
0
»
o-
cr
*^
o
^,
r^.
CO
^
9
0
CO •
iu e
U 0
1-1 ru
>
cc
Ul
CO
^
cc
o
a.
a.
3
CO
•e co
cc
CO IU
UJ t-
•~» cc
1-1 3
J Z3
U <
« Ul
u. x
0 C
r- x
in
cc
o
.»
•£>
9
O
O
^
in
o
j,.
•«
o
•
cr
cr
— .
•c
9
O
O
«
in
o
•
CO
o
' e
o-
o-
•—
o
•o
fM.
cc
^
9
O
•
0
0
ru
-J
*
o
*••
^
o
tr ru
V «
•e r-
1— 9
Kl
O
_
O O
c- —
m o
«P« t*.
1^, t^
Vft It
o o
K\ «
IWO
o o
« «
irv«
^ ^
V* *•
CO O"
om
F* in
O Kl
« ^
iO Kl
O O
• •
ru 9
o e
f ^
•e in
in *
••« «•«
o o
9 r-
KICO
tr —
^ ^
9 Kl
o e
• •
« tr
in -c
»•* VB
^
Z
Ul
z
IU
(3
<
Z
<
z
IU
>
•4 CO
»- cc
< IU
a t-
f- CC
CO < CO
*• 3 Z
Z CS O
z ^ cs
O Ul IU
< X CC
r- e •-
r~ X c
in
cc
V4
ff
9
ru
9
O
JZ
O
O
*"*
CC
•c
in
CO
^
tr
0
cr
^
o
e
—•
Kl
Kl
*
»-
ru
Kl
9
^
tr
o
•
CO
0
- «
*•
ru
Kl
O
«.
ru
WB
^
cc
0
•
in
ru
Kl
J
*
C
^
^
c
9
«
O
M
•"
9
O
O
O
CO
^
VM
ftj
^
^.
v«
O
O
in
in
«
c
•4
J
*
C
^
^
C
in
ru
ru
ru
ru
•
in
9
CO
O
•
tr
tn
ru
9
ru
ru
Kl
CC
•fl
in
ru
tr
in
z
cc
a.
a.
-------
cc
z
a
o
u.
>-
LJ
Z
UJ
is
<
z
O l-
l-» •*
t- Z
LJ *" 3
UJ 09
»- UJ Z
C Z) O
or o «-i <
O- ui n
EC —
_J LJ
^ •— UJ «
•— U O
z u
UJ C >• •
r => cc i
Z CQ 4
O <- 4
cc cr co -<
«-< I uJ 4
> C D 4
Z O 4
UJ O UJ <
cc a: 4
«f> 0- 4
UJ «•» *• 4
•- UJ 1
« >- B <
»- u. a 4
en r> i
X. 4
O 4
UJ 4
t- 4
*-l 4
Z 4
=> 4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.
4
^ 4
CC 4
O 4
a. 4
a. 4
3 4
en 4
4
•e 4
4
t- 4
Z 4
UJ 4
Z 4
UJ «
C5 4
« 4
Z 4
< 4
Z «
4
>• «
LJ 4
Z «
bj «
C9 «
4[
41
41
«
^«
* C
41 0
« 0
41 ^
*
* cc 9- in
4t LJ f^
« UJ O-
4( ^^ Q ^
4t C! >» 1 »-
4C *^ £t O U.
« o co a.
41 Z 0- 0
« »-i ••
4c
«
41
41
« U.
41 a.
4C
K
4C
4C
R
4: r-*
* 0
« 0
* *- o
« CO ~
« UJ
< D «
« o
* -« O UJ
• o co a:
I w ^
ft — H-
« UJ >—
ft U U.
ft CO.
ft 3 O
ft CD
ft
K ,
R
R »—
R U.
R a.
R
R
ft
R
R
R
R **«
R O
R C
R O
R UJ •—
R »~
R < «
k X
V «^
It t-
« en
K O1 UJ
* r^t^ t~
« » £>• >- u.
i •- — z a.
n uj c
< cc
< rr
i =>
« LJ
R
K *-
I U.
i a.
K
I
t
t
t
[ **.
I O
t O
_) 0
I CO < «-^
L ^\ f* 3
r < 0- »-•>
1
*
r\j
Aj
o
•
o
ni
_•
o
i»»
cc
—
.c
•
c
f\l
o-
«
<0
f
^*
o
•
e>
c
IT
O
•
O
tfl
t~
^
m
cc
•
^
«
in
ik.
•t>
r~
^B
O
m
er
^
a
o
1 •
r-
a
IT
cu
i^
•
ir>
o-
IP
ir>
in
«M
O
o-
•^
-j*f
<\J
_J
<
»—
O
H-
"tf
c
UJ
z
«D
r~
I
I
o-
"1
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-c
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
| A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Management (R166)
HO ORD
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt
APPRO: R & D
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Provide personnel, systems, procedures, data, analysis and information neces-
sary to manage and direct a comprehensive research and development program
being inplemented in 15 major laboratories. Inherent in program management
is the coordination and integration of the research and development program
with requirements and objectives of the Agency Program Offices and Regional
Offices.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Provided administrative and technical management of the research and
development program for the Agency. Specifically, these activities included:
»
* Program planning, program definition, program review inter- and intra-
govermnental coordination of environmental research and development.
* Managing and directing the Agency research program carried out in 15
major laboratories through technical guidance, resource allocation and
control, and policy definition.
* Providing the scientific and technical advice to the administrator,
program Assistant Administrators, and Regional Administrators to permit
the accurate and defensible establishment of environmental standards
and regulations and systems for monitoring the state of the environment.
Providing expert testimony, special studies and Agency representation
on scientific panels.
* Providing on-site coordination and integration of program management
functions for co-located ORD Laboratories at Cincinnati, Ohio, and
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Activities will continue as described in FY78.
4
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-73)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2s DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND COUt HO MfcUIAj PG H &S
R166 PROGRAM MANAQEMENT-ORD APPRO| R & D
Bf RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY FO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 109.0 98. o ?«.o 74.0
LEVEL OPFT 11.0 16.0 13.0 13.0
01 OF 05 FTE 126.3 10". 5 104.5
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) a, 000.0 4,2U«.0 3,323.« 3, 323.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
1. Accomplish program planning, definition, and review.
2. Provide resource allocation and control.
3. Carry out administrative management and policy development to satisfy
legal requirements with little capability for analysis.
4. Provide basic operating funds for the Minority Institute Research (MIRS)
Program.
Consequences of not funding:
!• If level 1 is not funded there would be no centralized program management
activity within ORD; or the operating program would be tapped an equiva-
lent number of dollars, thus reducing program output.
2. Reduction-in-force would occur at Headquarters, Cincinnati, and
Research Triangle Park.
3. MIRS Program would not exist.
23
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RM at DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
WWWWWWW*»*9WOTWWOTWMWM**WWAmfl»fl»OTfttBgfWWWHIWf>W(pV|BMiaiWWWMWWttVVW
, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIA: PG M g,S
R166 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-ORD APPRO| R&D
V«»W*«»WI*«*WWM»l»««V«»««*«iWW«V*«*««l»*ww»«i*«w«MM»»9«»OTV9«|pV
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2j DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAf PG M &S
R166 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-ORD APPRO: R & D
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY HO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 109.0 98.o 9.0 98.o
LEVEL OPFT 11.0 16.0 1.0 16.0
03 OF 05 FTE 126.3 5.9 120.6
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 4,000.0 «,24«,0 415.5 4,376.a
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
In addition to Level 2, the following will be accomplished:
1. Centralization of services at Cincinnati and Research Triangle Park.
2. Program Management Activities would be maintained at the 78/79 level,
which provides adequate scientific analysis, management studies, budget
planning, and administrative control.
Consequences of not funding:
\
1. Co-located Laboratories at Cincinnati and Research Traingle Park would
have to individually perform here-to-fore centralized functions.
2. Reduction-in-force would occur at Cincinnati and Research Triangle Park.
3. Administrative/Management/Budgeting activities would be performed at a
reduced level as compared to the present performance level.
25
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDJAj PG M &S
R166 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-ORD APPRO! R & D
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 c. E. FY eo INCR FY so CUM
POSITIONS PFT 109,0 98,0 98.0
LEVEL OPFT 11.0 i6.o I6.o
04 OF 05 FTE 126.3 120.8
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) .4,000.0 4,244.0 220,0 4,596,4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
In addition to Level 3, the following will be accomplished.
1. Increased funding for the MIRS Program.
Consequences of not funding:
*
1. MIRS Program would be maintained at FY79 level without any increase in
grant funds.
28
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
U
z
IkJ
(9
>-
Z (E
O <
H- 3T
•-
O UJ
IT U
CL tt
_l O
« en
»- UJ
z tr
UJ
Z •"
o z
cr r>
> z
z o
UJ •—
CO M
hL) LJ
fr- UJ
« C
*—
KI
O
11 1 J^
»- tr
««* O
z u.
,_
z o
Ul CC
X. O
CL. 1
o H-
UJUJ
> I
UJUJ
00
•e z
<
u
cc c
uj tr
en u
uj o
tr a
00275*
*
^ •*
ru a:
a
•D
0-
CD
O- ~
~ CO
»—
X.
t-4
CD
UJ
CD Z
9 <•»
— Z
Z
«D
O
V4
UJ
f^
-o *-
•5 <
t» _1
** 3
Z
CJ
o s
O- QC
*.. c>
z
»-•
H-
o- uj
f—
e- ct
""" £
-1
CD
ru in
KI a
KI ru
a KI
KI t>
ru m
KI a
«. *
KI (VI
a KI
KI t>
ru in
KI a
• »
KI m
a a o KI o o in
KI KI o o- a KI a
ru tr HI in r-- — o
KI r^ in a —
* « *
KI ru ru
a a o KI o o in
KI KI o t> a KI a
ru t> KI in h- — c
KI r^ in a -•
« » •»
KI ru (vi
O O O •* O O KI
a a o o CD « •*
a — K> a o- — ru
ru *- in — —
• ^ *
a KI KI
o o o o o o
O (VI OD O C> —
o r- CM « o —
O * K> O- —
a KI ru
^*
o
• o t—
(4 »- U- UJ
in ^^ ^j ^^ i» f^ kv
o < o tv o u.
• uj a: o <— ^>
U. I 05 S 0
o •- D i •» ••
=> 0 < «- 05
— < i a z
0 »- O> O
>- z x >- **
_l UJ ** UJ << H-
UJ CJ •-• ^ _l -1
> C t- CO
UJ 3 3 O
_i m o a.
o- —
o —
« KI
0- O-
KI ru
0- -
0 —
« KI
0 0-
•KI (VI
0 -.
o —
•C KI
o o-
^ ^
KI ru
o- —
o «•
•C KI
0- 0-
• »
KI (VI
o- er- o — o o t>
o o o *• t> in a
* H>XI K> » — —
tr a in o- —
» ^ «
KI KI ru
in in CD o o a
*- ^ — in ru o
KI KI 1- — —
« -c a
O O O ^ O O KI
a a o o CD -c «
a — « o a. o u.
• uj o: o ^« *~
U. I 03 S 0
o >- =) r •» —
— O «; ~ o>
ru < X tr z
0 *- CO O
H- Z X >- «
_IUJ •- UJ «I «-
UJ L5 •— •— _l i-c
> O »- 05
UJ 3 3 O
-<
•C CD
r- KI
KI ru
^ «
a KI
a a o * o o OD
X -f> OODCC * 0
t- a K>KIO- — ru
KI CD If! (VI ~-
^ « *
a KI KI
in in in o o o-
in in r-o- — in
— — o
a a KI
O O O •*> O 0 KI
a a o o 09 ^ iC
a *^ KI a Of- -* ru
ru t- in — —
^ »i ^
a KI KI
o o o o o o
oruoo oo- —
o r- rvi « o —
o * KIO- — «
a KI rvi
-^•s
O
O ^>-
W t~ u. UJ
o « o tv o u.
• uj tr o w. w
U. I CO 3 O
o *- 3 r f> "
'S O •< ^ CO
KI < i a z
O 1- CO O
»- Z X >- i-i
> C •- «0
UJ — 3 O
_) o
in a
a KI
a a
^ ••
o- o
in a
a KI
a a
•c —
o- o
in a
* fc
a KI
a a
* ••
o o
in a
* *
a KI
a a o a o ooo
* * o — OD * o
o a in o o -~ ru
m «B f~ a , —
a KI KI
O O CD
o o ru
ru ru •*
ru ru —
O O OJ> O OKI
a a o o CD ^ ^>
a ->KI a o »rw
^ • «
a KI KI
o o o o o o
o ru or o o- —
o r» ru * o —
o * KI t> «•
a KI m
^^
o
o
o t-
•n t- u. u.1
C < 0 D. O U.
• uj tr o -^»-
u. i w r> c
O ^ *^ z M ••
3 o < •" n
a « i a z
o t- m o
>- z x >• >-i
_| U.' "* UJ •« »-
> o »- o
UJ ~ DO
_j ct o a.
-------
o
z
UJ
o
LU
I-
o
cc
CL
Z >
SIS
§1
UJ
5
I
CO
O
O
o
Z
O
O
LU
C
C
LL
J-lvO
60
SeJ
.. CL
< 0
•r cc
Q CL
UJ o.
5 <
Q
Cd
0
O ua
Z CC
/•"•
vO
v£
r"
oi
^ -
]
C
QJ
(U
Q,
K
P
CC
g
B
CO
V-l
01
0
M
P-i
LU
Q
O
0
Q
2
<
LU
-J
H
(-
DECISION UNI
<
CO
K
Z
LU
s
I
CO
J
(V
ACCOMI
UJ
>
H
<
O
5
D
U
o
00
w
*"
>-
u.
1
_J
LU
UJ
-J
1
|
-J
LU
>
UJ
_J
J
>d
| LEVEL
4
_i
UJ
>
LU
_1
1
f\
\
-J
LU
>
UJ
_l
4
i
•*J
UJ
LU
-1
m
r»
o> _,-
^ 0
>• cc
U. Q.
LU
00 ^
r- S
m 1
*~ i—
> V)
U. LU
UJ
tr
U)
<
UJ
2
o5
LU
_J
t-
H-
1-
•z.
UJ
«=
ACCOMPLISH^
en
^
2 S 2 " ° ° ^
CM O O r-. vo -H
CO O CM — <
,
u
•H
H
- j .
•H .Q
Xl (I)
•^ rH tO
w *o *o i— i AJ
e CD o c
g rj rH M S
O- CO r-l i-| .U p
w g o oto ecuo
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ OANR MEDIA: Mgmt.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OANR (R257) REG. APPRO: A&C
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this Decision Unit are to develop national policy
for and direct implementation of a national regulatory program for air,
noise, and radiation pollution control; to provide for coordination of
these programs with other Federal agencies and State/local governments; to
provide for development of program-specific guidance for Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Mobile Sources Air Pollution Control, Radiation
Emissions Control, and Noise Control; and management of OAQPS, OMSAPC, ORP,
and ONAC.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The main achievement for FY 78 is initial implementation of the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1977, and the development of major policies related ~
thereto. Included were: 1) Liaison and coordination with the Administrator,
Deputy Administrator, Office Directors, Regional Administrators, and other
Assistant Administrators, and Deputy Assistant Administrators; 2) Liaison and
coordination with Executive and Legislative Branch operations staff, repre-
sentatives of national and international organizations, industry representa-
tives, and private citizens; 3) Executive direction and supervision of Deputy
Assistant Administrators within OANR; and 4) Program planning, budget develop-
ment, resource analysis and control, correspondence control, and administra-
tive services for the Assistant Administrator and four Deputy Assistant
Administrators with independent operating organizations.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
All functions carried out by the Assistant Administrator and Deputy
Assistant Administrators in FY 1979 will be continued. Clean Air Act
Amendments implementation-related work will concentrate on the SIP
revision process and follow-up actions.
29
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAf PC M &S
R257 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OANR APPROf A i C
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ MB^ ^ ^ ^ ^ IB ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ fM M ^ ^ M|
^mapB»»«p^(wapg»»wBi»^
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND COPE)
Program Management - OANR \K257) (continued)
HQ OANR MEDIA:
REG. APPRO:
Mgmt
A&C
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL FY 79 C. EST. FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
-°L0F-£2.
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
At the Deputy Assistant Administrator level, resources will provide
for:
(1) Management direction and supervision of division and staff
office directors.
(2) Liaison and coordination with Executive and Legislative Branch
Operations Staff.
(3) Administrative Support services for the Deputy Assistant Adminis-
trators Staff.
THE IMPACT OF NOT FUNDING THIS LEVEL
If this level is not funded, all proposed functions would have to be
carried out by the Administrator and Deputy Administrator ,
As such they will become responsible for direct management of seventeen
separate organizations (divisions, labs and offices) which constitute
the Air, Noise and Radiation Programs.
31
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAf PG M &S
R257 PROGRAM MANAGEHENT-OANR APPROj A & C
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 JNCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 57.0 57.0 8.0 51.0
LEVEL OPFT 14.0 14,0 a.O 14.0
02 OF 03 FTE 68.7 9,7 74,0
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 2,898,0 2,271.2 340.7 2,044,1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Description and Benefits
At the Assistant Administrator level resources will provide for:
(1) Analytic capability to evaluate program and staff office
performance, policies, issues, and resource utilization.
(2) Analytic capability to provide budget and resource analysis
support for regional programs for which OANR is NPM.
At the Deputy Assistant Administrator level, resources will provide for:
the capability to plan programs (including budget proposals), and to analyze
issues and program performance within their organizations. •
Impact of Not Funding This Level
If this level is not funded program development will be left to other
decision units and coordination of program plans will be eliminated. Fiscal
accountability will be dispersed among (operating) decision units, reducing
the possibility of maximizing the effectiveness of resources used. Identi-
fying problems, such as delays in reaching planned objectives, will be more
difficult.
32
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ
R257 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OANR APPRO| A & C
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79c. FY0
POSITIONS PFT 57.0 57.0 6.o 57.0
LEVEL OPFT ifl.o 1U.O m.0
03 OF 03 FTE 68.7 3.0 77.0
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 2,898.0 2,271.2 227.1 2,27^2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Description and Benefits
At the Assistant Administrator level resources will provide for special
analytic capability to evaluate policy alternatives as they relate to complex
technical issues in the air program.
At the Deputy Assistant Administrator level funding provides capability
to provide liaison and coordination with representatives of national and
international organizations, industry representatives, and private citizens
for activities specific to tfceir organizations.
IMPACT OF NOT FUNDING THIS LEVEL
If this level is not funded the number and quality of analytic and
management activities of the Offices of the Assistant and Deputy Assistant
Administrators will decline.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
>-
z
o
«
>•
Z IE
O «
t- I
IJ 3
yj co
O UJ
CL u
3
_l O
« cc
»- UJ
z cr
UJ
r >-
Z ^*
o z
a 3
> z
z c
CO
CO 1-1
UJ U
t— UJ
•» o
CO —
c
•- IT
•^ O
z u_
^
z or
c z
•- o
« 1
0 Z
•< UJ
CC. X
1&J
•e u
<
uj r
co<
o
z z
<
••E
o: o
•» O
« a.
0.
0033 SE
r- ru
IM cr
9
CO
*
CD
O* *•*
— CO
bj
bJ
(U(£
COZ
o- •-
W4 Z
z
*
(V
^
CD
O-
*rt
U
1-1
o *-
O 9
O — ffi — 9 — 9 co
r- ^ o- co in — <
ru cr rw cc-
« » ^
ru — —
o o o K> o o
eo •• f-ir> f^ 9
o- f- ru o in —
x * ru 9
ru ru ru
o
o
o *-
M I-U. U,'
e « c c. o u.
• UJ o: o «^ >-•
U. I CO => 0
o •- 3 r •» —
3 O « ** CO
— •« x a z
o >— co o
t- Z X >- «
_J UJ — UJ < •-
> o »- «c
bj => no
_i te oo.
— *
9 *
9 O-
O -C
ru ->
•— -c
9 -O
9 0-
o -o
ru —
«« ^
A •
9 -C
9 »
O 41
« ^
ru -»
*
- 9 «
9 ^
O -C
* *
ru -•
— Kl CC O O C C
9 O- 9 * — 9 9
9 co in o- in •-»-
o f- ru «
«• » «
ru *• ^*
t- •« — cc o of-
o ru co r«i co 9 <>
9 r^ « co
m ru ru
ru o ru — c ot»
— ru o- tr> r~. 9 cc
^ r- o- co in •« -c
ru o- ru CD
^ ^ ^
ru — —
O O O KV C O
CO ~* f^ IA f* 9
tf r^ ru o in •>
to -c ru 9
ru ru ru
0
o
O 1-
M •- U. UJ
o < o c. ou.
• UJ IE O «-fc*
U_ I 1C O O
o r- 3 a: •• —
O O * ^* CO
ru ^ z tt z
a >- co o
t- z x >-«
_J UJ •- UJ < t-
UJ tS *^ ^* J i^
> c •- co
UJ 3 3 O
_> (C O CL.
ru —
•• **
t^ CO
ru cc
ru —
ru -»
_T IP
»^ CO
ru co
ru —
ru ••
« «
— tn
1- CD
ru co
* ^
ru —
ru -•
-• in
h- CD
ru co
ru "
ru 9 «• — o o o
— «K1 ^ in >- 9 K-
»•» co «o co m — r-
ru o- ru co
» ^ *
ru — —
~.«oino o
f-9 >nco * rt
ru o- KI oo
ru ^ ^*
ru o ru — o o r^
•• ru £>• in ^^ 9 «o
r-i- o- co «r -. «
ru o- rucc
» * ^
ru — —
o o o Ht o o
co -• r- tn r^ 9
o- »- ru oin — •
cc * ru 9
ruru ru
o
o
o t—
•* »- u. iu
G ^ O ft. O b.
• UJ CO w» ^
U- Z CO 3 0
O •- 3 X •» —
30 « «--CO
« < z a z
0 •- CO O
(- Z X >- «
_)UJ — UJ < >-
UJ CS ^ w _l «-•
> o t- to
UJ 3 3 O
_j IT o a
CO
r~
I
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
PROGRAM MANAGMENT OWWM R260
HQ OWWM MEDIA: Mgt. & SuJ>.
REG. APPRO: A&C
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Provide overall top-managment policy and direction to the
Drinking Water, Water Quality, and Solid Waste Programs. This
includes executive level program and policy guidance to the
OWWM program areas; focal point for liaison with other Federal
Branches and the private sector; OWWM program assessment; and
OWWM program support.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
___ Managed development of final pretreatment regulations and
program. Managed a significant effort to amend regulations to
implement provisions of the Clean Water Act Amendments; developed
regulations to implement Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, and developed additional regulations and standards of
the Safe Drinking Water Act; Participated in significantly
improving ZBB procedures leading to the FY 79 Operating Plans
and FY 80 Budgets. Developed regulations to enhance public
participation in all OWWM programs. Included, through reorgani-
zation, the office of Solid Waste in OWWM.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
In addition to continuing the ongoing management activities,
resources of this decision unit will be directed towards:
continued management of implementation regulations development
for RCRA, on Underground Injection Control regulations and
organic standards to amend the Primacy Drinking Water Standards
for the SDWA, and revised regulations to implement the CWA e.g
effluent guidelines, construction grants, etc. Manage the
development of the ZBB.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ " M£DIAI"PG"M"&S""""*
R2bO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OWWM APPROj A & C
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT%Y J^c''*. "FY"*O"INCR"""F""80
POSITIONS PFT 55.0 53.0 q.o 50.0
LEVEL OPFT 9.0 )2.0 2 0 90
02 OF 04 FTE 68.5 73 64 3
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2,311.0 2,357.1 353.5 2,12U3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
1. Manage the ZBB process within OWWM for developing operating
plans budget. Conducts financial management.
-2. Reactive review and response to external management initiatives.
Impacts
This level provides the Assistant Administrator with
the ability to conduct his program planning and budget develop-
ment within the Agency's formal system. Limited independent
analysis is provided.
^ c
03
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM 2» DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAj PG M &S
R260 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OWtfM APPROj A & C
^••••••^•••'••^••^•^•••••^••••••••••^•^•(•••••••••^•••••^••^••^•'(•••••••IP***
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY PO JNCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 55.0 53.0 oi.o «i.o
LEVEL OPFT 9.0 12.0 7.0 7.0
01 OF 0« FTE 68.5 57.0 57.0
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2,311.0 2,357.1 1,767.8 1,767.8
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This decision unit includes the immediate staff of the Assistant
Administrator for Water and Waste Management, the Deputy
Assistant Administrators for Drinking Water, Solid Waste, Water
Planning and Standards, and Water Program Operations. It also
includes the Office of Program and Management Operations within
the Assistant Administrator's Office and selected management
activities with the offices of the Deputy Assistant Administrators.
Activities
1. Management direction of the OWWM programs.
\
2. Policy and strategy development and guidance on matters
pertaining to the Agency's water quality, drinking water,
and solid waste programs.
3. Management and review of standards and regulations develop-
ment to implement provisions or amendments of the CWA,
RCRA, and SDWA.
4. Limited liaison with Executive Branch and Legislative
Branch.
Impact
Basic policy and strategy development and guidance and line
management are continued at this level. Line mangers will
provide liaison to the extent possible within the Executive and
Legislative Branches. Coordination and review of OWWM standards
and regulations will continue. Budgetary analysis and
development and financial management will have to be provided
by the Agency's Office of Resources Management.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAi PG M &S
R260 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-QHKM APPRO| A & C
™ ™* ** * ™ * * * " ™ ™ * " * ™ " " * ^ ^ ™ VI •• IB V V •) • • • • • • OT • V flp IV • V " • • • " W W |P W 9 •* •• fP ^ * • ^ ** •• M tf Bl • ^ IV 4P V •• *
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BQ INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 55. o sj.o 5.0 55.0
LEVEL OPFT 9.0 12.0 2.0 11.0
03 OF 04 FTE 68.5 6.4 70.7
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2,311.0 2/357.1 235.8 2,357.1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
1. Expert scientific coordination and advice.
2. Coordinate or conduct, management programs.
3. Coordinate public involvement.
Impact
This level provides expert scientific input into OWWM management
activities to assure ecological and public health perspectives.
Guidance and coordination is provided in areas such as employee
development, E.E.O. Affirmative Action, Upward Mobility etc.
Management programs are provided such as manpower allocations,
space utilization, organization and functions, contracts manage-
ment, ADP systems, records management, internal and external
(GAO) audits, etc.
Impact of OWWM's limited public involvement resources is
improved.
37
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
u
z
bJ
U
Z CE
0 «
>-< r
U 3
uj tn
O bJ
CE u
=
_J O
« 05
»- UJ.
z a
but
r i-
Z «-H
0 Z
cr 3
>• Z
Z D
bJ •->
co
ID *M
UJ U
»- UJ
« c.
>-
o
UJ Z
H- IE
z u.
3
£
I
X
O
1
0 Z
Z UJ
UJ bJ
•— tS
m
o- a.
^J
r- 3
0- t-
— CJ
O Kl
Kl O O O
r- r- f- -« r~ r-
•o ^ * 5r in
r» r- sr
« « ^
•• •" "•
CC CC Kl O O O
r- r- r-. .- t- r-
« -c ru CD in o-
-• KI »- •• in
KI — — cr
ru ru •»
„
o
o
O H-
«! »- U. UJ
9 ^^ _1 *^ U» d. *~
o « o n. o u.
• u a o — w
u. x en 3 c
O »— 3 £ •> ••
3 O « ^ 1C
— < X z -z
O »- 05 o
r- Z X >- <-•
_j iu « bJ « >-
UJ O " ^ _> —
> O •- «
UJ 3 3 O
_i CD o a.
Kl >-
•M O
ru •«
•— r-
rC
f^ r-
• •
«~ o
fXi 4>
»* f*-
ru -•
Kl V^
— e
ru •o
«*« r^
» ^
ru -.
Kl »-
• •
— e
ru *
"I »
ru —
Kl Kl »- O O Kl
— — o o a a
ru ru ^ tn ^
*•• *M t—
^ « ^
ru ru —
in in a o o KI
KIKI KI o ru »-
in in o
KIKl CW
— — a o o in
f~ r- « KI ru to
in in in in — «
Kl Kl O
ruru -.
o o o — o o
-»o ru cc in o-
•* KI ^- "^ m
Kl -t— 0-
ru ru —
••—
e
o
o >-
t< ^- u. uj
a « _i ^ it a. t-
c < OCL o u.
• uj cr o ^»^
U. X «03 0
O «— 3 £ •» ~
3 O « ^ to
ru < x a: z
o i- to o
H- Z X >- «
« I UJ ^ UJ « >—
UJ C2 ^^ *-* ^ ••*
> £i ^- 1C
bJ 3 3 O
_r cr o a
r- •«
tn in
Kl 0-
ru —
• •
r- -o
in in
Kl C^
ru -.
*i .
r^ ^
m in
Kl O
^ «
ru —
~* a
• •
r- -o
in m
. »
ru —
— — • a o o r-
r- r- j> in — o
in in in m — f-
KI KI «r
» » «
ru ru «
to cc r» e o a
in in in mru -o
Kl Kl O-
ruru —
— -. a o o tn
r-K- « KI ru cc
tn m mm — *
Kl Kl O-
ruru —
o o o — • o o
— o ru CD tn o
— Kl r» — m
Kl — ..0-
ru ru —
^
o
o
o t-
w »-u. 10
a«-» _j^» u-tx >-
O « 0 o. O U.
• uj cr o ••• »*
h. X CO 3 0
O t- 3 £ « —
3 O « »^ to
Ki< X tE Z
O >- «5 O
•— Z X >- 1-1
_IUJ •• UJ « *-
Ul O « w _1 1-1
IU 3 3 O
CO
r~
I
I
O-
o
OCC-8
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Management - OTS (R 263)
HO OTS
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt.
APPRO: A&c
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The goal of OTS Program Management is to insure the implementation of
the Agency pesticides and toxic substances programs through the provision
of policy direction and management.
The obj ectives are to:
Establish Agency strategy for implementation and integration of the
pesticides and the toxic substances programs under applicable Federal
statutes.
Develop and manage Agency programs and policies for assessment and
control of pesticides and toxic substances.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The Assistant Administrator and three Deputy Assistant Administrators
were appointed to implement the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Major policy decisions were made on use of the inventory of chemical
substances, implementation of the premanufacturing review program,
establishment of a hierarchical approach to testing, completion of
pesticides RPAR actions, and implementation of generic standards.
An organizational plan for the Toxic Substances program has been deve-
loped, approved and implemented. A reorganization plan for the Pesticides
Program has been developed, approved and implemented. Studies for
integration of selected pesticides and toxic substances functions were
begun.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
In FY 1979 OTS Program Management will:
Provide guidance throughout the year on development and implementation of
policies and programs, including zero base budgeting guidance.
Evaluate resource utilization and, as needed, make changes.
Furnish the Assistant Administrator regular assessments of program progress
and problems.
Periodically brief the Administrator and give him early warning of antici-
pated and actual problems and meet regularly with the other Assistant
Administrators.
Evaluate proposed FY-80 Operating Plans and FY-81 budget estimates.
Provide adequate administrative services needed by the Assistant
Administrator's and Deputy Assistant Administrators, including recruitment
of several hundred additional persons to implement TSCA and FIFRA.
Provide analytical support to ensure that the Assistant Administrator's
and Deputy Assistant Administrators' decision-making reflects knowledge of
major issues and evaluation of alternative actions.
Participate in Steering Committee review of rulemaking and in activities of
other Agency groups involved in strategy and policy development.
J
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HO OTS MEDIA: Mgt.
REG. APPRO: A&C
Pro gram JManaeement - OTS (R 263) _
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Develop recommendations for Agency priorities for research, monitoring,
regulatory, and information-gathering activities relating to pesticides
and toxic substances.
Promote coordination of all Agency programs engaged in toxic substances
activities.
Develop scientific, technical, economic, and social data basis for the
conduct of hazard assessments and evaluations and regulatory actions
in support of toxic substances and pesticides activities.
, Monitor, evaluate, and assess pesticides and toxic substances program
operations.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Major legislative amendments for the pesticides program were worked
on with the Congress and planning for their implementation begun.
Oversight of TSCA begun.
In October 1976, when TSCA became law, the Agency's resources allocated
specifically for the Toxic Substances program amounted to 45 positions.
In FY-78 TSCA implementation was provided 196 positions. 140 of the
additional positions are already filled, recruitment to fill the others
is continuing. Special efforts are being made to recruit toxicologists
and other specialists who have the expertise needed to deal with TSCA
problems.
The Toxic Substances Priorities Committee, including senior representatives
from other components of EPA, has been formed. Formulating of a
strategy for implementation of TSCA, establishing of priorities for
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Speak at national meetings and participate in press interviews and briefings
Testify at Congressional hearings as required.
Periodically hold meetings of the TSCA Priorities Committee with other
Assistant Administrators and Regional Administrators.
Furnish Assistant Administrator and Deputy Assistant Administrators advice
on scientific soundness of TSCA & FIFRA actions.
1*0
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Ma-nacrp-mpnt- - nTg (R 263)
HO. OTS
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt.
APPRO: A&c
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
implementation activities, and establishing of policies and procedures
for coordinating of implementation activities has begun.
. Prepared FY-79 and FY-80 program guidance and zero base budgeting plans
for the Toxics and Pesticide Programs.
. Major efforts on toxic substances research and development planning
within EPA and among other Federal Agencies were participated in.
. Management information systems which monitor project outputs, contracts
personnel recruitment were begun. '
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
1*1
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2» DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAj PG M &S
R263 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OTS APPRUf A & C
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 2XJ.O 60.0 05.0 45.0
LEVEL OPFT 1.0 1.0
01 OF 05 PTE S5.« 52.5 52.5
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O) 1,226.0 1,998.0 1,462,« I
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This decision unit includes the functions of the Assistant Administrator
for Toxic Substances, the Deputy Assistant Administrators for toxic
substances and pesticide programs, and their immediate staffs. This
level provides for:
Management direction and supervision for the toxic substances and
pesticide programs.
Provision of limited guidance during the year on program development
and implementation, including planning and zero base budgeting guidance.
Minimal fulfillment of administrative needs, including managing the
hiring of people to fill a large number of scientific positions.
Response to internally and externally generated demands for information
on, and participation in urgent matters, primarily of a policy nature.
Testifying at Congressional hearings as required.
Furnishing the AA information on major problems in programs, and options
for alternative actions.
Notifying the Administrator when major problems materialize.
Meeting with other Federal officials when there are significant problems
to be resolved and with other interested -parties. •
Provision of some analytical support in insure that the AA's decision-
making reflects knowledge of major issues and evaluation of alternative
actions.
Furnishing the AA with annual assessments of program office performance
in achieving outputs related to implementation of annual plans and
legislatively mandated requirements for the toxic substances and
pesticides programs.
Benefits
Provides basic policy and program development, liaison, coordination
and direction of the toxics and pesticides programs.
Consequences
The Toxic Substances and Pesticide Programs, two of the Agency's major
public health programs, could not be implemented without this basic
level of policy direction and management. Alternatively, resources! o
would have to be taken from elsewhere to provide these functions.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2- DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
™ ~ * ™ ^ ™ ™ ™ " * • ™ • • ™ ™ w W w • • • • W • • Ml * flp W •> • •• • gp 9 V W W •• •> "• • • V Wl •* • •! •* IP" •§ • • 4M • ^ • IV W V I
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEPIA» PG M &S
R263 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OTS APPRO| A i C
B. RESOURCE SUMHARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 24.0 60.0 9.0 54.0
LEVEL OPF1 1.0 1.0
02 OF 05 FTE 55.a a.5 57,0
BUDGET AUTH.. COOO.O) 1,328.0 1,998.0 405.0 1,867.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
The resources included in this level will:
Assist the operating programs with some aspects of personnel management,
procurement and other administrative services.
Provide the AA with advice on the scientific soundness of TSCA actions.
Periodically brief the Administrator to keep him informed of antici-
pated and actual problems.
Periodically consult with Congressional staff and other Federal
officials; some coordination of activities among agencies to be
»- accomplished.
Speak at 10 national meetings and participate in press interviews and
briefings.
Benefits
This level should enable the AA and DAAs to exercise management
control of the toxic substances and pesticide programs under their
purview. It should be possible to establish output commitments and
meet them within each DAA's office. It should be possible to begin
to direct, but not fully provide, administrative services required by
the program. Independent scientific assessment of policy and program
issues related to TSCA will be provided, ensuring more sound policy
decisions.
Consequences
The AA's and DAAs' managerial effectiveness would be marginal.
Activities itemized above would be carried on at lower levels, or
not at all. Timeliness of TSCA and FIFRA actions undoubtedly would
suffer. Communications with interested groups would probably not
take place. Recruitment of new personnel would be hindered. The
administrative and analytical services required to keep OTS programs
going and to support decision-making would have to be provided
elsewhere or not at all.
1*3
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG M &S
R263 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OTS APPRO| A & C
" ** ** ** ** *" ** ** * ** ^ " V ** " • • • • <• iV •*
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Management - OTS (R 263)
HQ OTS
REG.
MEDIA:
APPRO:
Mgt.
A&C
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL FY 79 C. EST. FY80INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
-2— OF— 5—
rnnfinued
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Consequences
Management effectiveness would be low primarily due to the lack of
analytical capabilities that form the basis for sound decisions. The
Office of Toxic Substances would participate only marginally in Agency
policy making and regulation development and would not be able to
adequately evaluate program performance internally or as it related
to activities of other EPA offices and other pertinent Federal agencies.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
>-
u
2
e
^
>-
z rr
o «
f* i
1— z
U 3
UJ K>
O UJ
cc u
3
_l 0
« CO
•— Uf
Z Ct
u
I •-
z «
o z
rr O
>• z
UJ >->
CO
CO •-
U) U
^" UJ
« c
CO —
c
UJ £
H- CC
** o
z u.
3
CO
c
« z
u r
z fcu
< C9
^ «K
0 Z
cc <
3 Z
CO
r
o <
•-* z
x is
0 O
>- cc
a
^
< >^
^
o ru
ru cc
a
CO
c-
(D
rj*-***
-• CO
UJ
CO
UJ
ru cs
a
— cc
3
_J
H- 3
O- t-
«• 0
«
«M Ki
^ ••*
a ru
"* "*
a CD
ru KI
< «M
a m
— -•
a co
• •
ru KI
•c —
a ru
* «
a c
ru KI
^ ***
a ru
» »
"* ~\*
a a co o in
ruru KI in ru
^ *
a a CD o m
A/ ru KI in ru
« « —a in
a a ru
. » »
o o o KI o o a
CD KI in co o -» en
o- ru •«• in « in
0- 0- o. o u.
• uJ ce o v ^
u. X CO 3 C
O •- 3 Z •» —
3 O < ^-05
— < x or z
O »— CD O
•- Z X >- «-i
_l UJ >^ Iij * ^
UJ Cd ^^ ^^ _-* h^
> o >- *o
UJ 3 3 O
_1 GO O O.
a o
#- o
•*> IT
CD in
••• "^«
a o
r- o
•O to
co m
— -•
a o
• •
r» o
•a in
CD in
« «
a o
»^ o
•c m
co in
^ »
*• *•
a a o o e
^- r* o a r«-
•o « in in in
co CD in
* * *
*• «* v«
o o ru o in
m m •*> o- a
o e KI
a a KI
o o o KI o o a
o
•" ~*
^*
o
o
O H-
•1 •— U, UJ
in»- _j ^NU. CL H-
O < O Q. O U.
• UJ CC O ^* »^
U. X CO 3 0
O >- 3 Z •» —
3 O «t ^ 05
ru •< x oc z
O t- CO O
^- Z X >-!-•
_1 UJ « UJ < H-
lu ti ^^- _i «
> C >- CO
UJ 3 3 O
_tcc o o.
a in
r~ CD
~* KI
CD KI
ru ru
a in
r- «e
*^ KI
CD KI
ru ru
a in
• •
r- CD
« KI
CO KI
^ *
ru rw
a in
c- cc
**4 KI
CO KI
ru ru
a CT o in o o r-
»«. r- o CD e a in
w» *^ O KI ^ iC
CD KI in KI
» * ^
ru ru ru
c o e in o o *-
o o o CD o a cc
inm o CD
o a in r-
o o o KI e o a
cc KI inco o — in
o- ru r- in « m
o- o- -c
-- •-
o e> e ru o o
CD co o »• a <•«
ru eo a — ru
ru CD KI e
_ ^
^^
o
o
o »-
09 >-U. UJ
inx _i A>U a. *-
o < o a. o u.
• uj ec o ^* ^^
u. x «o 3 o
O •- 3 Z •» —
Kl < X CC Z
c t- m o
>- z x >- M
_IUJ —UJ •< >-
ill ^ ^^ *B^ ^J) *>^
> o f- to
UJ 3 3 O
_l CO O CL
I
O-
o
00 SO
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ OE MEDIA:
Program Management (R 369) REG- APPRO:Enforce.
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
This decision unit includes the immediate office of the Assistant Administrate
for Enforcement and his Deputy Assistant Administrators. Major objectives
are to:
"Provide policy direction and management to national enforcement programs
for all media. Assure consistent application of environmental regulations
ar..d enforcement response to violations.
"Provide independent and confidential assessments and advice to the Assistant
Administrator, including development of testimony, speeches, and personal
communications.
"Provide a full range of administrative and maagement support services to the
Assistant Administrator, Deputy Assistant Administrators, and all Office of
Enforcement Divisions.
"Provide advice to Assistant Administrator on overall resource planning;
direct and coordinate Office of Enforcement participation in program planning
and budgeting operations of the Agency; and assure proper and effective use
of Office of Enforcement personnel and resources.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
"Provide policy direction and management to national enforcement programs to
assure a consistent application of environmental regulations and enforcement
response to violations.
"Initiated Major Source Enforcement Drive, national enforcement strategy
review and national penalty policy and panel. Implemented Memorandum of
Understanding with Department of Justice.
"Provided management, administrative, and economic-support to the Office of
Enforcement and its Divisions including support and assistance in developing
annual guidance and budget materials and ADP coordination.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
"Provide for management of National Enforcement Programs
"Support Major Source Enforcement Drive
-Coordinate civil penalty panel
-Track and handle major enforcement cases
-Provide independent legal advice and expertise to AA in preparing and
presenting major civil enforcement actions
"Improve Enforcement Methods
-Provide for more effective and efficient policy analysis and strategic
planning. Continue enforcement strategy review.
-Provide for oversight of day-to-day activities of DAAs and staff offices
-Provide for improved communications and increased public participation in
enforcement programs
"Provide for program planning and analysis, budget, and financial management
for Office of Enforcement
Provide administrative and management support for Office of Enforcement L7
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2} DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG M &S
R369 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OE APPROt ENFORCEMENT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 35,0 37.0 28.0 28.0
LEVEL OPFT 3.0 5.0 2.0 2.0
01 OF 05 FTE 44.1 35. « 35. 4
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 900.0 1,297.3 1,007.2 1,007,2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This decision unit includes the Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and
his immediate staff, the Deputy Assistant Administrators and their immediate
staff, and the Office of Program and Management Operations, a staff office
to the Assistant Administrator.
I. National Program Management:
- Provide policy direction and management to national enforcement programs
for all media.
°Support of Major Source Enforcement Drive
- Provide support for litigation tracking system for major civil enforcement
actions.
- Coordinate civil penalty panel.
- Provide independent legal advise and expertise to Assistant Administrator
in preparation and presentation on major civil enforcement actions.
0Improve Enforcement Methods *
-Provide AA with capability to address special enforcement issues including -
a capability for making independent assessments and recommendations
concerning enforcement policy.
II. Planning and Analysis
- Provide ADP coordination including review of ongoing and new OE ADP
systems.
- Coordinate & review the development of the OE portion of annual Agency
program guidance.
- Coordinate OE review of legislation initiatives & develop annual recommend-
ations for legislative changes.
- Participate in development of Agency media strategies.
- Represent Assistant Administrator for Agency Steering Committee process.
- Analyze & make recommendations on management & organization changes.
- Provide program analysis support for each program and provide for ability
to coordinate with NEIC, review legislation, testimony, etc., & provide
more qualitative guidance & assistance in the processing of contracts.
- Prepare special reports for the Assistant Administrator, including
Enforcement Progress Report.
- Direct OE review during operating year of Regional Office performance
against output commitments.
- Provide independent OE economic analysis capability.
III. Budget and Financial Management
- Direct & coordinate development & review of OE portion of annual Agency
budget materials including involvement of regional office personnel. Coor
dinate preparation of enforcement portion of Agency OMB & Congressional
{.Q budget documents. Develop materials for OMB and Congressional Hearings &
" in response to questions raised by OMB & Congressional committees on
budget * planning matters
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
LEVEL
1 OF-*-
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Management (R 369)
HQ
REG.
OE
MEDIA: Mgtt
APPRO: Enforce.
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL FY 79 C. EST. FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
- Provides for coordination, review and implementation of OE operating plans
- Provide financial management support to include maintenance of commitment
registers and reconciliation of automated accounting reports and pre-
paration of financial reports, projections, and reprogrammings.
IV. Administrative Support
- Provide transportation to & from meetings and hearings for AA.
- Provide support and advice to OE on Agency awards, health & safety require-
ments security criteria, EEO matters & labor union relations.
- Provide full range of administrative support, including such activities as
average grade and ceiling control, staffing analyses, procurement, space,
and mail distribution.
IMPACT
- This level will continue management of national enforcmenet program.
- The enforcement program against major source violators of Air and Water
Acts as expressed in OE guidance, will be supported by assistance to the
penalty panel and tracking of major cases. However, the support at this
time is minimal.
- Capability to address special enforcement issues is provided. This level
will continue overall enforcement strategy review.
- Assistant Administrator will have some capability in his immediate office
for independent analysis, but no resources for in-depth or technical
analysis.
- Provide the AA with limited capability of planning, handling, and coordina
ting major civil enforcement actions.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
* ** * *^ ~ •* •• V * W • • • W • • * •• * • • • • V W V • • MM 9 •§ Ml • Qp (i H MOT •§ IP «f • • •• •• V 9 tf • K 0 gp |y ^ 9 ^ 10 4p V V ^ IP W> fli
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAj PG M &S
R369 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OE APPROt ENFORCEMENT
WQiWVOT***W*'*WVflFWWVWMIfliMMOTOTMVMWVfflMIWWfpWMIBMWW«WWW
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DRM 2? DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIM PG M &S
R369 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OE APPRO! ENFORCEMENT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 35.0 37.0 a.o 37.0
LEVEL OPFT 3.0 5.0 5.0
03 OF 05 FTE 4«.l 2,0 «<|.l
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 900.0 1,297.3 106.0 1,297,3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
All of Level 2, plus:
- Provides more effective communications and increased public participation
for enforcement programs and AA.
- Provides additional capability for long-range and strategic planning.
- Provides program analysis capability for new programs.
IMPACT:
- Enforcement methods will be improved by providing a capability for in-
depth analysis of policy issues and long range planning.
51
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
£
19
<
>-
z ct
o •<
•i X
>- r
U =3
*-
o iu
oz u
3
-JO
< CO
*- IU
z or
Ul
31 «^
z «•»
0 Z
or 3
> z
z o
Uli-i
in
to —i
Ul U
1— Ul
« o
CO —
o
Ul Z.
t-CE
*•* o
z u
tu
c.
1
z
tu
U)
cs
t- «
z z
tu «
c z
Ul
u r
a «
o ec
U. C5
z o
tkl ft
a
•tf
2*€ ^
<
tU Kl
CM cr
CD
C-
••4
CO
o--.-.
— CO
tu
X
^
CO
CO Z
o- «•«
~ z
z
a
CO
c>
*M
Ul
t-4
O H-
CD <
^ vJ
VH ^
Z
0
-
UJ.
0 X
CC Ul
o- a
— 0
z
*~
o- ui
r-
0- IE
— a
u
_,
»>• n
o ^
~<
ru »^
r* *
O I***
o e
«U Kl
^ ^
O t*-
O 0
J^
M «
o r-
0 «O
J-^
CU Kl
•^ -0
o *-
O CO
«
• •
fU t\l O Kl O O 9
r* «u in -c co «v tn
O Kl f"» ^- l\| Kt
C O~ CC
*
V*
ru n» o KI o o 9
r- tu in * eo fa in
o KI ^r- ru K>
0 O CD
*
VN
Kl Kl 0^ O O •"
r- m a
C* fW '^ fU Kl a
tu «u »-
* * *
o o o o o
o e> KI «n KI
O O CD •**
o- o- ^
-*^
C
c
O f-
<* t- u. Ul
in «- _i ^» u. o. H-
o < o Q. o u
• ui or o ^* ^»
U. X CO Z> 0
O •- 3 X *» —
D O « ^ CO
— « X - t-i
_J Ul *• U' < »-
UJ C> — «-• _l "-1
> o ^- to
ui a s o
_l CC O CL
KI if* Kt r*-
— * 1^ CO
o KI o- ru
-» o tu -<
Ki in KI t*-
— • * f- CC
O Kl O- f\l
— O fU —
— — — ^J
Kl m Kl f.
O- K. 0- M
— o tu -•
— J« J« «Z
KI m KI r-
— « 1^ CO
O Kl O- tU
— o iu —
» ^ ^ »
** *^ •* »-
Kl Kl Olfl O C. — KIKlOr-OO —
— • « en « KI in «v >» tu in CD r<- in cr
O**»*-K*KI « ~c & tv«r tu
CDCC « O O O
^* •* — € V4 w^
K*KVO^»OO*- Kl KV O *>~ O O — »
^ tu in CD »- in «r r> tu in co >» in 9
Onj^-fXIKt 9 OtU^-tVKI 9
•u tu — m«\j -<
« » « • » •
oo ooo oo ooo
OO Kl in Kl OO KIITkKI
OOCCKI O O CD Kl
er c> r«- » »• ^
-»» -*•»
O 0
C 0
0 1- 0 t-
CR >-UUI « t- U. Ul
in^ — j ^^ u. CL >— m^» j^*ii.c.»—
O 4OCLCU. O < OQ. O U.
• ui a o «w «ui cr o ^»^
u I en — o U.XCO3O
O"-3r«*— o<-=>xc» —
3 o < ^ to no<«-»cn
f«•• en o o >—no
•— z x >- i-i _ z x >- M
— »tu •• ui « >- _i uj — ui « •-
UjC5^-'^'^*«t Ul O *^ »^ — J i^
>o t- tn >o >-cn
uin =>o tu=> DO
_ICC OO. -ICC OO.
-------
o
Z
LU
O
o
LU
I-
o
cc
Q.
CC §
> w
Z W
LU H-
LU
X
if)
O
(J
U
D
Z
o
LU
Q
cc
O
4J
.U C
C CU
cu e
e a)
flj f)
oo M
ca o
ca c
S W
.. 0.'
< O
D ?
LU Q_
5 <
o
s
0
O LU
X EC
^_i
0>
tti
C
<1
LU £
Q S
0 vJ
o c
•^ c
fc!
^
UJ *"
^t C
-J a
f- £
H Q
^ 0
1- C!
U
ic
00 (.
0 g
LU £
D.
<
M
t-
z
LU
Z
eg
3
D.
J>
o
o
u
^
^r
_i
D
2
D
CJ
o
00
o
>.
LL
_J
LU
^
LU
-1
n
i
LU
LU
~*
.j.
_J
LU
^
LU
_l
I
•rJ
LU
>
UJ
J
_j
LU
^
LU
-J
I
'
LU
^
LU
O
r**
Ol -^j
*" O
> CC
u. a.
LU
1-
05 S
>- , 0) O. CO M
*° g ,c § ^ '•'"'
T3 U & CO
0) rH i-l i-l
S 0) JS f*. «
cu c ^ j-i M
•H Cfl i— 1 Lj
> a M ca o
0) O C **-<
(-1 >, 4-1 CU CU
4J a, M
CO r-l CO
cu ce a) >-. o
CO C CO XI CO
Cfl CU Cfl Cfl
O P, O T3 O
cu
ooaiocuo 53
4J t-t
h MM M > M
cu i-t a) o cu cu cu
JD CU ^ CU .O M XI
EC e ex e B
3 ca 33 3 to 3
!3 p< S CO 3 -H a
,^
00
r^
00
cs
0
CM
E
o
LU
Q.
LU
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Buildings & Facilities (R480)
HO. 0PM
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt.
APPRO: B & F
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of this decision unit are to ensure that Agency
facilities are adequate to meet program requirements, safe for program
staff and operations, in compliance with Federal pollution abatement re-
gulations, energy efficient, and that the Federal investment in real pro-
perty is protected. This decision unit provides funding for repairs and
improvements and new construction projects to accomplish these objectives,
Facilities program management staff are funded by another appropriation.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Sixteen repair and improvement projects to correct health and safety
conditions or maintain the property have been completed or are underway.
In addition, the construction contract for the Central Regional Laboratory
at Manchester, Washington, was awarded during FY 78. This project is ex-
pected to be completed in March 1979.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Ten repair and improvement projects required for correction of safety
deficiencies or serious disrepair of facilities are planned. In ad-
dition, preparation of the Program of Requirements and contracting for
the design and construction of a laboratory facility for research in
carcinogens and toxic substances at Gulf Breeze, Florida (the second
step in a three-phase construction program to provide safe facilities)
will be provided.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2« DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R480 BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
HQ
i PQ M iS
APPRPi FACILITIES
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY
INCR FY 80 CUM
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 1,001.0 2,563.0 900.0 900.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
1. Provides for repair and improvement projects for design of pol-
lution abatement projects at laboratories in accordance with Agency
effluent guidelines and for correction of the most serious safety
deficiencies.
The projects follow
552.
Narragansett, R.I.
Beltsville, MD
Vint Hill, Va.
Bears Bluff, S. C.
Athens, Ga.
Gulf Breeze, Fla.
Montgomery, Ala.
Bay St. Louis, Miss.
Chicago, 111.
Duluth. Minn.
Ada. Okla.
Denver, Colo.
Corvallis, Ore.
Wenatchee, Wash.
Manchester, Wash.
Benefits of Funding
Lab Entrance Design $ 3,000
Security Lighting A,500
Meter Interlock 2,500
Pump Replacement 26,000
Fuel Tank Cross Connection 2,000
Pollution Abatement Design 25,000
Lab Mods (Bldg. 306) 100,000
Carcinogen Storage Construction * 75,000
Pollution Abatement Design 3,000
Water Supply System Design 5,000
Repl. Cooling Twr Roof 4,000
Sprinkler System Design 15,000
Fume Hood/Scrubber System 35,000
Fume Hood System Design 10,000
Containment Lab Design 3,000
Pollution Abatement Design 65,000
Carcinogen Storage Design 15,000
Fire Suppression Design 4,000
Safety Mods Design 20,000
HVAC Construction 420,000
Sanitary Sewer Design 2,000
Water Supply Sys. Design 6.000
$ 850,000
Correction of safety deficiencies identified in contract industrial
hygiene surveys, and compliance with pollution abatement guidelines.
Consequences of Not Funding
The health and safety of Agency employees and the general public
are jeopardized and could result in closing some laboratories.
Provides for preparation of the Program of Requirements and con-
tracting for the design of an electrical switchgear, shop, and
storage building at Gulf Breeze, Florida. $ 50,000
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
Level 1 of 2 continued
Benefits of Funding
Design and construction of this facility is the final step in a three
phase program to replace existing frame structures with more adequate,
less hazardous facilities.
Consequences of Not Funding
Would require continuing occupancy in an unsatisfactory wood frame
structure endangering personnel, equipment and supplies.
Construction funds will be requested in FY 1981.
58
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2S DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R480 BUILDINGS » FACILITIES
HQ
i PG M &S
APPROt FACILITIES
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
1*001.0
2,563.0
525.0
1,425.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Provides repair and improvements required for correction of safety
and security deficiencies and serious disrepair of facilities.
Edison,
Gulf Breeze, Fla.
Cincinnati, Ohio
Duluth, Minn.
Grosse lie, Mich.
Ada, Okla.
Denver, Colo.
Corvallis, Ore.
Wenat chee, Wash.
Manchester, Wash.
Benefits of Funding
Sanitary Sewer System
Water Supply Sys. Design
Heating Sys. Design
Elec. Sys. Mod. Design
Security Fencing Design
Sprinkler Sys. Mods
Relocate/Renovate Bid. 34
Renovate Bldg. 7 Design
Remove Bldg. 25/26
Concrete Pavement Repairs
Roof Repairs
Storage/Paint Shop Design
Lab Waste Drain Lines
Design to Upgrade for Labs
Air Cond. Equip, Design
Egress Mod Design
HVAC Mod Design
Ele. Service Mods
Security Fence
Access Road Design
Bldg. 60 Mod Design
Pier Repair Completion
$ 150.000
20,000
50,000
20,000
8,000
12,000
60,000
2,000
4,000
.33,000
8,000
3,000
5,000
30,000
30,000
5,000
24,000
15,000
2,000
6,000
3,000
35.000
$525,000
Provides correction to items of disrepair at EPA facilities, a safer
environment for EPA employees, and provides facilities to better sup-
port program missions.
Consequences of Not Funding
Safety corrections will not be made, some EPA facilities would not
receive routine maintenance type repairs, and program functions
would be limited by the quality of facilities available.
57
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
z cc
o <
•- X
u =3
UJ CO
»-
O UJ
Or U
CL Or
_l O
« co
t- UJ
z tr
UJ
z ^-
Z 1-1
o z
or =>
»*
>• z
z c
UJ •*
to
CO II
UJ O Kl a
O ITi —
i ru o a
a a
o o o - r> x •» -
13 O « +* to
— < x or z
o >- to o
>- Z X >• x
_| U) M UJ < »-
> c >- eo
ui 3 => o
_j cc o o.
o
o
o t-
x •» -
r> o •« ~»to
ru •« X or z
o t- to o
H- Z >C >- •—
J UJ *^ UJ < ^
UJ o »--^- _l •—
>• fi t- to
uj r> => o
_J IE O O-
-------
o
z
UJ
CD
O
UJ
O
tc
Q.
59
£E =
> w
Z JO
U,H
UJ
a.
O
O
8
Z
g
V)
o
UJ
'OC
O
u.
JJ fa
60 ta
s: CQ
.. a.'
<£ O
2£
s<
ff* ^fc
£
MJ
o
C3
O uj
X CC.
^^,
o
1
ca
\^f
CO
Ol
1-1
— . JJ
UJv4
Qi-<
O-H
Q«
15
UJ CO
_J bO
1- C
K£
^T3
1—'—'
h
3»
z
0
CO
0
UJ
a
<
M
h-
z
UJ
to
e.
5
o
o
u
<
UJ
>
H
<
D
5
2
o
CO
01
^
u.
1
_J
UJ
UJ
_l
1
1
J
UJ
UJ
•J
1
1
-1
UJ
>
UJ
_J
1
_l
UJ
>
UJ
_J
4
_!
UJ
>
UJ
_l
J
_)
UJ
>
UJ
_J
OV-
r*.
o> — ;
** ^1
- o
> cc
u. a.
UJ
»<
^1
>S
UB jifJ
UJ
CC
D
to
<
UJ
2
o3
UJ
_j
H
K
H
2
UJ
5
I
to
_i
a.
O
U
u
<
CD
1
*
0 0
mo- o 1-1
^ <• in
CO
i— i
.
p
.
0 0 » ^H
• ^^^1
o CM o r-i .^^B
m CM m
.
0 0
co o o
*45 i— < o i— i
in in
o i^.
CM \O OO
Cn r-l Ov
•-I f-i i-(
—1 CM
JJ U i
C Oi O
oi ui e t-i
E u a
JJ Ol CO 0>
CO >•> JJ JJ Ol
oi o o co >
> <-i ai g -H
CD. i-l CO O" JJ W
•HE O JJ O> U jj
0) LI o -o oi y
>, o. oi cd ^ ai
O « i-i VW -^-l W
C>i MO -OOi. OJJ
aiuoatictoijo
M ^ ai a. co 1-1 c a • 1-1 <-< > . j^H
JJ ^ 0 > -H E 0 ^H
o TJ z o y co -co-2; ^H
^ C C ^ C8 U 7^
CL, -H CO (i, U-i 60 |oi
>-< CM
I
Ik
2
W
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
POLICY DIRECTION R-503
HO ;
REG.
MEDIA: MGMT.
APPRO: A&RM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
o Provides overall executive direction and leadership necessary for manage-
ment of the Agency
c Manages Agency EIS preparation & review activities; and compliance with
NEPA requirements
o Provides for legislative services and congressional relations
c Provides expert, independent advice to the Administrator on the
scientific and technical issues facing the Agency
c Fulfills formal international environmental treaties; manages the Agency's
relations with other countries
c Manages the Agency's relations with the public, the news media, State &
local governmental officials and other Federal agencies
Manages the Agency's civil rights program
Provides for formal administrative law hearings as req. by law or regs
FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
n™V^ °ve^1:1- direction & management of the Agency; special assistance
provided to the Administrator in the area of Indian policy and intra-
agency coordination of TOSCA-IRLG
Developed a coordinated program to implement Pres' urban policy including
initiatives on land use and growth impacts j-ucxuuj.iig
P™P^ 30.leSi!lative proposals, followed-up on 180 Congessional hearing,
Provided scientific advice on 15 major policy issues .
Initiated international participation in the toxic substances control
effort as well as international exchanges of research & information
Carried out equal opportunity hiring and employment programs
Held a full schedule of Administrative Law Hearings
Managed EIS program; assured EPA compliance with NEPA requirements
Provided public awareness services
Maintained liaison with officials of State & local governments and
arranged for their input on issues and policies
c Developed innovative projects integrating EPA programs with State and
local governments and other Federal agencies
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Continuation of FY78 activities in addition to these changes:
o An increase in ALJ caseload is anticipated especially in the area of
pesticide cancellation cases
Implementation of a minority business enterprise program
Establishment of a newly mandated Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Upgrade support of the Administrator's international toxic substances
control initiative
Implementation of President's urban policy
The following functions will no longer be provided in this decision unit:
o Contract Compliance function—transferred to the Department of Labor.
60
c
c
C)
0
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2« DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
m*mmmmmmmmmmmm<*mm*"*mmmm'*""mmmmmf'l"fm*i*'*"**f'*m*mmfmmtfmmm*mmmmmmmmmmmm
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO HEDIAj PG M &S
R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPROj AGENCY i REG MGT
" * * ** • W W • • • 9 W W W M • • » • IB Hi V Mi •> V • d fp V W • •§ • * p> <9 •• • IP V • • • • M M M V • M • • M M M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 265.0 289.0 219.0 219 0
l-^EL OPFT 33.0 «6.0 jslo 3S.Q
01 OF °8 FTE 364.0 303,9 303.9
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 10,657.5 12,030.5 S235.2 9,235^
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Provides for the basic operation of the Office of the Administrator, the
Science Advisory Board and each of the seven staff offices. At this level,
provides for staff support and limited advisors to the Administrator, con-
trol of only the most critical correspondence (White House, OMB, Congress)
addressed to the Administrator. Provides for the five standing Science
Advisory Committees that were in operation in FY78; emphasis will be on the
review of the five-year R&D plan and provision of advice to the Administrator
on major scientific issues. Provides for a focal point and secretariat for
the Regions in Headquarters to assure regional participation in agency policy
and regulation development. Provides support for testimony on major legis-
lative proposals and Congressional liaison; meets only the most crucial and
insistent demands of Congress and OMB; fills the basic Agency needs for le-
gislative packages, testimony, briefings, and legislative reference materials
Allows for basic press services, abbreviated EPA Journal, speech 'support for
A/DA, basic publications and the operation of the Visitor's Center. Allows
for coordination of US/USSR and Common Market international environmental
agreements. Provides basic policy guidance and oversight of the Great Lakes
and Ocean Dumping Program. Provides technical guidance and direction for
the Agency's Civil Rights efforts. Token conduct of Agency internal EEO,
discrimination complaints, Hispanic, Women's and external civil rights pro-
grams. Minority Business Enterprise effort would be initiated through a con-
tract. Provides for limited oversight of NEPA compliance activities.
Hearings and prehearing conferences would be held on regulatory actions in
accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act.
Benefits; Provides for a minimal level of executive direction and leader-
ship necessary for the management of the Agency
Consequences of not Funding; Would remove the leadership support function
from the Agency, including functions required by statute. Reor-
ganization and recission of law would be required.
61
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM d\ DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
„ DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAf PG M 8,8
RSOS POLICY DIRECTION APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 1NCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 265.0 289,0 34,0 253.0
LEVEL OPFT 33.0 46.0 6.0 41.0
02 OF 08 FTE 364.0 25.5 329.4
BUDGET AUTH. (000.03 10,657.5 12,030.5 1,663.2 10,898.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Acids secretarial and speechwriting support, assistance and advice to the
Administrator on agricultural matters. Adds scientific review and advice,
protocal guidelines and health risk assessments related to TCSA. Provides
for ongoing liaison with national organizations of intergovernmental offi-
cials. Increases capacity to handle Congressional requests, correspondence
and support for Congressional testimony. Increases press and constituency
services in TSCA, Air and Water programs. Negotiate with Canada and Mexico
on cross-border environmental issues. Develop policies on coastal areas and
oceans. Provide staff assistance for Hispanic, Women's and internal affir-
mative action programs. Improve EPA's own environmental assessments and EIS.
Reduces backlog of Administrative law cases requiring hearings.
Benefits: The functions and responsibilities of the staff offices would be
conducted in a marginally acceptable fashion. Most mandated
activities could be supported.
Consequences of not funding: No discretionary activities could be performed.
62
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 25 DECISION UNIT LEV£L ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HG MEDIAf pG"M"I™""""""""
R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPRO? AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. * FY^o'lNCR*"™Y*8o"cUM
. POSITIONS PFT . ass.o 239,0 13.0 266.0
LEVEL OPFT 33.0 «6.0 50 46 0
03 OF 08 FTE 364.0 13.7 343 1
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 10,657.5 12,030.5 648.8 11,547^2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Adds assistance to the Administrator in the area of urban policy and land use
planning; conduct scientific review of five new major regulations; increased
support for Congressional hearings and testimony. Adds complete staffing
for the Minority Business Enterprise initiative, and provides for area EEO
coverage in Cincinnati and Las Vegas. Adds additional EIS review capability.
Provides some increased capability to handle anticipated Administrative Law
Judge caseload related to pesticides cancellations.
BENEFITS: Provides an adequate level of support for implementation of the
Minority Business Enterprise program, and the development of land use strate-
gies and policies; some added capacity for monitoring Congressional hearings
and provision of independent scientific advice to the Administrator as well
as reducing the backlog of Administrative Law Judge hearing caseload.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FORDING: All staff office activities would remain at
token performance levels.
63
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DRM 2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS'
,A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDlAj PS M tS
'R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPRO: AGENCY I REG MGT
5, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL DPFT
04 OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000.05
FY 78 ACT
285.0
35.0
10,657.5
FY 79 C. E.
' 289.0
46,0
364.0
12,030.5
FY 60 INCR
20.0
3.0
14.2
625.0
FY 60 CUM
266.0
-------
z
UJ
ts
<
a-
z or
o <
— r
UJ W
WK
C UJ
a w
0. 21
J C
< to
*" UJ
z z
u
z —
e z
tr 3
> Z
Z —
«r
UJ »-
ff?
(ft •••
uJ U
f UJ
<. c
m
C
U £.
^- a
»•« o
z u.
~
a.
« o
£ IT
v> u
^ tU
Z e
X C
^
4 ^
<->
_ J
=> 0
a a.
c: 5 s£
•« tn
-c
0
c
e-
•"
o- »
— 09
X
M
^
0)
tb>
fV c?
e z
»• —
— z
<
0.
c •
0-
•M
u.
o •-
c «
c^ — i
— 13
£
u
tw
e £
u a
IT «
n o>
ru a
«» cc
IV 9
' • •
"1 C-
fV 9
m w
• •
IT £
1*1 ^
m »
c- c
~ *
*^ ^
rv 3
» »
o- e
rv« s a G e o-
in si o * o- IP "^
>U fo 7 7 fU ^
c- f- — »
•M « C S G G O-
in « o * c- i/i -•>
p*> a? ^ ^ •» Kt o
f^ V^ Q* 9 fV f^
* * * %
e- ^ — sc
in «s ^ — o G e
G «v »*• n c- ^ a»
o IT o o rv KN
» » * »
«V G — —
in ir> G o- o e
*- ^ O c- »fi r*
in in o G e m
•G **> f> C M
» ^ ^ *
o o- — • e-
c
o
«• •- U. tt.'
o < o c. o u.
• uj c: G ^" *-*
Uu X VJ I? C
o — a r M -
— < r c: z'
_ ^ 2 x >• —
* ° ^^ - 5
-JC C CL
c ^ »^ « me
cr AJ a r\j ^- o*
c o in -o — — •
GO — O IV —
» Ifl f\J 9 fVJ 9
• • • • • • •
o- fv 9 ni *- O"
c G in * — —
e e — G nj —
9 in ru 9 m 9
• • • • • •
c ^ p* i** iw 0
e^ rv 9 ^ >*• o-
Oj O Ifi « — —
e e — o rvj —
. J ~ 9 .J 9
9> Al 9 fU *^> O1
coo in -C — —
to to to to to to
o o — o ru —
- . _
9^minGG9 (Vin^9GO«- ru^>^9GGf1
C) o c o ru « in « « * rvi m — — c* — IV w
G^^G ••^•••G ruo«»<» %
— — _ — _ _ _
rv — — — o o in « « n< r> o G r^ o » in "^ ine«v>s»«i9
iCwoj**1^ *v 9<{> ^> ^** «• ru9f^f^ru •»
^ PO fi in ^ m in ^ ^ m
» * »
•• ^ «•
iner-»GGG in «o "- — o o o in » •» — o © c
e«ur.ieo-«9 o ru r» e » .c 9 G <\» »» « o- « 9
Gin9Grv P^ Gm9Gfv «^ Gir>9Gru f^
«««» «»«• ^«^»
rv e — — ru o — — n e — —
tn tn o o- o o inineo-ee in in G o- G o
<^f»G9inKi >^ r- o c in «o r- r~ o s uZ**\
minGOor^ inineGc«»> irimGeoD*^
^•^Kicorxi ^vt^foru ^f)Wttr\)
»^»% »^«» *«^*
oe- — o- o e -•O' G o- — »
•
G G 0
GOO
M **u»u M ^b.u M ^bkibJ
G < O O. C U. G -ZX>-"" »-ZX>--« »ZX>->-
Uju— «^J«- UJ g »- •* _J — ^C^^^CJ
UJ — ~ C UJ — ~ C U2 3 C
_ICC Cr O. _JE O O. _! C O Q.
e
-------
UJ
UJ
I
^^ ^C
2 w
UJ
C£
_J
e.
O
(J
2
O
U
UJ
Q
C
O
i— 2
r 2
i <
1^
C uj
UJ
O
O
u
a
z
<
UJ
_l
K
£
K
Z
=5
Z
g
i/5
5
UJ
O
UJ
ID
u
c
(ft
<
UJ
s
UJ
5
c-
O
U
U
<
^o
co
o
sr
s
i
ll
I 1 s
•0 "B
C 01 01
o c c
0
u
s
K
01
ZCU*J
W-HCS
I
O E K
you
fl)X(UC
>°
W-OO'H
-H < o
n.
o
i
n
00)
o £
« ^ i-
C-^OS
SoSc
ra £.
B S
6iyo)SR!OB
05
to
0.
UJ
-------
o
z
UJ
o
<
g
h-
U
LU
H-
z >
II
ll
> w
z
LU
CO
LU
o
Z
g
t/5
a
UJ
cr
O
is §
£3
.. c.'
< 0
2<
X
o
O LU
o
vn
I
1
u
u
0)
u
o
u
•rt
r- 1
O
ft-
—
UJ
Q
O
U
O
z
w
LU
(,_
u.
Z
3
CISION
LU
Q
<
C/9
^
Z
LU
C/3
O.
1
u
u
H
^
J
2
o
CO
s
>
e>
LU
LU
LU
LU
LU
LU
_J
LU
UJ
_J
LU
LU
_)
UJ
LU
C* <•!}
" o
> =
u. c.
UJ
S <
o 5
> 0)
U, LU
LU
C
D
M
^
LU
oS
LU
^
P
Z
LU
2
^
in
COMPLI
u
<
o
m O EM in
ts rs. vo ^
»n (N
O O CM in
co r^ so fH
<• CN
(M O O m
m Sj ** ^
CTN o O m
en S "*
en O fM in
tM r* so i-i
in es
\a Q Q
•C !M
O
w w o>
a M u
b2 C
•o cn o
QJ „ H- -H
-3 S H rH
•H e a
> -H JJ S
O vu eo o
u o u
a -o a.
c *^ <
Q eg en a- -o
C HH Ed U
O 4J U 03 Z *J
to IM C U
u a u o < 3
a; u M -H a- "o
a. -c a. a ta e
eo u o
*^ C U^ *W CQ ^4 U
o -^ o -o o o
1-1 41 e w
ua)u3iJOi-i3
zuz ^ z ** z u
X^v /"^t >^^ ***,
«c in \o r^
^ ^^ '^ ^
eo
p»
00
(N
O
I
O
Ik
0.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ MEDIA: MGT
Policy Direction (R503) REG. x APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
To provide direction and definition to EPA policy as it applies to the
regions; to anticipate and resolve potential policy issues before they
become critical. To encourage greater involvement of state government
in policy formation through the development and implementation of state-
EPA agreements; and to encourage state assumption of program responsi-
bilities through delegation. To' expand relations with local governments
through implementation of an urban strategy. Increase Federal agency
cooperation and coordination on environmental issues. Improve EEO
performance as evidenced by an elimination of EEO complaints. Establish-
ment of substantive public information and public participation programs
in all programs. Increased use of constituency group media. Maintain an
active MBE program.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Establishment of the Inter-Regional Liaison Group (IRLG) involving FDA,
CPSC, OSEA, and EPA. Provides.for information sharing, cooperative
inspection, cooperation on personnel, interagency training, equipment
sharing and common lab methods. Many regions consolidated their inter-
governmental and public affairs activities into an Office of External
Affairs. This will improve relationships with state and local governments
and with congressional delegations. Establishment of regular communica-
tions with the agriculture, labor, and business-industry constituency
groups. Set up procedures for development of state-EPA agreements. These
should be completed in FY-79. Expanded list of minority business contrac-
tors. Increased commitment to the Federal Women's Program. Active involve
ment in state/federal energy issues.
Dl FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Define and implement EPA policy. Shape and articulate policy to states,
local government and the general public. Provide answers to inquiries
from all sources, including Congress. Maintain a civil rights program
within the agency. Coordinate public participation in environmental
programs and projects. Coordinates with other agencies and FRC.
Coordinate regional programs with R&D activities. (This activity
occurs only in some regions.)
68
EPA Fern 2410-10 (6.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'ORM 2: DECISION UNIT LE
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIA; PG M ig
R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT • 239.0 223.0 isi.o isi.o
LEVEL OPFT 26.0 75.0 50.0 50.0
01 OF 05 FTE 312.6 273.3 273.3
BUDGET AUTH. (000, 0) 6,500.0 8, 237. a 7,002,9 7,002.9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Policy direction provides for the following activities
1. Policy Direction - This includes the activities of the Regional
Administrator, his Deputy, Management Division Director and secretarial
support. Provides the planning, programming, policy implementation,
management direction, and control of the technical and administrative
aspects of EPA activities within the Region. Four regions maintain off-
site offices under this DU. These offices serve as field offices in
specific states or territories.
2. Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations - Includes limited
response to inquiries from state, local government and congressional
sources. Maintain general knowledge of Federal legislation, serving as
liaison with Headquarters Offices of Legislation and Regional and Inter-
governmental Operations. Arrange meetings between the Regional Administra-
tor and key Federal, state, local and congressional representatives.
3. Public Awareness - Respond to public inquiries, limited media
program and minimal dissemination of public information, limited speakers
program and speech preparation, coordination and technical assistance for
public participation in environmental programs.
4. EZO Programs - Moderate level of training for EEO counselors and
statistical recording of minority and female employment and training.
Minimum effort toward minority business enterprise participation in EPA
contracts and Title VI of Civil Rights Act.
5. R&D Needs - Some regions include R&D in this DU. These activities
include reviewing R&D grants application for responsiveness to regional
priorities; provide regional guidance to ORD for program planning and pro-
vide liaison between regional personnel and ORD for technical assistance to
region.
Benefits
Funding will allow basic management and policy direction to be provided;
meetings with state officials; basic administration of the regional office;
minimal congressional and public awareness programs, and development of EEO
programs mandated by law. Contract funds at this level will be used to
support the agency's Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) initiative and
Public Participation efforts.
Consequences of Not Funding
Funding below this level would cause a significant impact on overall re-
69 gional effectiveness. It would effectively eliminate the public awareness,
EEO activities, and/or intergovernmental relations functions.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOR* 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
• » • • W V • » • • • V • • iV 4B V •• • V IV • W IV • • • •*• •§ ••* • W * •»• • •• tt • V flft V • • » M w V IV ^^ ^ • ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj RG M IS
P503 POLICY DIRECTION APPRDt AGENCY I REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
02 OF 05
BUDGET
AUTH.
FT
(000.
E
0)
FY 76 ACT FY 7«? C.
239.0 223
26.0 75
6,
500.0
312
6,237
.0 36.
.0 10.
.6
.a
33»
i,2oe|
R
0
0
1
rrs
6,
506,5
211.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Allows for greater participation in FRC and other interagency meetings
and committees, increased contact with state and local government,
increased guidance to Regional Administrator and Office of Legislation
on legislative matters. 'More aggressive media involvement, greater
development of public information programs; development of constituency
programs. More vigorous recruiting of minorities and females. Encourage-
ment, stimulation and monitoring of minority-owned business participation
in EPA funded projects; additional training and assistance for agency EEO
counselors. In Regions 2 and 5 funding would provide for monitoring
R&D activities and stimulating and soliciting research projects. The
additional contract funds would be used for MBE and public participation
activities.
Benefits
The benefits of funding at this level are improvements in intergovernmental
liaison, public awareness and EEO activities.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level will permit only formal or token participation in
interagency meetings and FRC. It will prevent significant progress in
minority and female hiring, training, and EEO counseling, and MBE encourage
ment. Public understanding of agency programs and policies would continue
to be minimal. There would be no direction to relations with the press,
which would remain primarily reactive in nature.
TO
EPA fern 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R503 POLICY DIRECTION
PG M ts
APPRO! AGENCY & REG MGT
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPc-T
03 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,03
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
239.0 223.0
26.0 75.0
312.6
6,500.0 8,237.a
FY 80 INCR
23.0
15.0
39.2
1,159.6
60 CUM
243.0
75.0
345.7
9,370,6
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Would expand activities in certain areas. There would be more emphasis
on the development of EPA agreements with states and other Federal
agencies; assistance to states on the development of necessary statutes
and regulations, and active regional involvement on some major state
environmental issues such as major new source reviews, or energy impacted
areas. Public involvement would include constituency building. Western
regions would develop an Indian program and would explore the receptivity
of Indian tribes to the assumption of EPA programs. EEQ"activities would
be expanded to include more emphasis on other minority groups such as the
handicapped and Spanish speaking. Two more regions (4 and 7) would add
R&D functions at this level.
Benefits
Funding at this level would permit management to play a more direct and
active role in advancing toward major regional objectives and to do so
with more vigorous and effective public support. It would also fund a
more comprehensive and aggressive EEO program, and would establish a
visible R&D program in some of the regions.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level win delay achievement of EPA agreements and
weaken the impact of regional management on other high priority regional
objectives.
71
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
e
CD
0
e
O- "•
«• CD
UJ
r
MM
*-
cn
UJ
IV CS
CC 2
e- —•
— z
z
«
c.
*•*
E
c s
•c 0-
>. •_
Z £
D 5 -
«- r
UJ CC
O UJ
C U UJ
^ ~ »M
_j 5 e —
z c — Is
u; r
c z
c =
> r •-
2^ y
W «"-•
if «— UJ
cc e ^
er> P- o uJ
u- LJ e- a
« c z
^ *•
*n
c
u- r
*~ S: *~
Z U- C* U.'
J^ f*
e^ c
u
f» 2
(^ *»
— U
Z
O
£
UJ
C
c
^
tr> u
z —
0 _J
cs el
UJ
2T *n
O
>- in
tt C
(V. Ik
O 3
e e
*"" *
0- «-
fv rv
c a
o c
^ *
t^ p»
• •
IV IV
& e
e e
* *
f- •£
O l«-
n re
o
IV ^ ^ iV ^ C *^
c c in c cc in f»-
cs CD ™ ff *• ru
» » »
cr « CD «y c& e ^
»- K. «C CD "1 in IV
f^l & CC ••* IV *- —
iv ^ in in iv KI
CC »- f-
e e o o e
o o e &• ^
o e cc »** C. 0 U.
• UJ c C *^ *^
u. S cr, s s
o •- n r •• -
S C « •M' «R
— < z z r
C N» C3 O
•- Z X >- »-
*J U> •- UJ < *-
jj cf ^^ ^ _j ««i
> c •- o>
uj ~ ^ ^
— > cc o e.
0 (V
•• a
— tn
^
— — o tn o e> rv
cc. *i in — cc o »i
c * e — *t — *o
IV — —
» » .»
ff ^> CD W O O ^
^-. CD CD cc- KI in rv
^> o cc* f1^ rw t^ ^
rv ^ in tn rw *n
Cf. f»
e o e 00
CO 0 P- *
ce cp r^ iv
in in c- rw
* * tn
1
o *-
•A ^- 4k UJ
0 < 0 6. & U.
• l*J SC C *^ *•*
u. Z 05 — O
O — => Z «• —
S O « — • CB
ru « Z C Z
c >- K o
•- r >t >- ••
_1 UJ •- UJ < *-
y,) (^ ^^ ^^ ,^ »•
> 0 •- «
uj = =0
_l C O C.
o —
*- rw
K\ *
o cc
« o
c —
>- «v
•* *
0 CC
« e
• •
o —
r- rv
m *
^ «
O- CC
< o
c —
*•* ru
•* «
« »
c- cc
< CD CC C C O»-
o »» ru — rv tnin
• ^> CD CD rw 0 r- c
»*» ^^ in ^ fv *n
0 CD CC
^ *D O CD O O «V
c- cc <•• -o »n in c-
tn r^ CD *c rw *• KI
•M f^ Kt O
» »
e -*CD cs- o e»*
^ CD CD CD ••> in «V
**> s? CD *^ rv *^ ^
rv « in trov «n
CD ^- »-
J
00 000
U- 00 0 0 *
co CD vi rw
in in c- rv
** *"
e
e »-
M t- u. U.'
e < o o. o b.
• IU ft C — —
u. I «5 — e
D *- 3 I •» —
O D < ^* cr>
«•< x ec z
e t- cn o
*- z x >- —
_) UJ — UJ < l-
^J (^ ^^ ^^ ^J) VM
>• O •- tn
UJ = => C
-JO. O O.
-------
a
LU
a
<
2
O
K
CJ
LU
U.
b
c
c.
t-
2 >
II
li
LU
2
I
C/5
O
U
o
2
g
e/j
O
LU
Q
Cu
o
Lj ^
E ^
£ a
• . ex
< 0
5£
LU a.
S <
X
C5
O LU
zz cc
ri
O
1
Ci
_
5
JjJ
U
3)
—4
U
•— ^
i— fl
o
Cu
LU
O
o
u
0
z
J
1
™
^•>
r™
z
D
O
35
u
LU
C
<
CA
t—
2
in
LW
LU
LU
LU
LU
_J
LU
5*
LU
n
LU
LU
-J
1
**4J
1
LU
LU
-1
LU
LU
_J
ffl
e> -,•
*" 0
> c
L_ C.
LU
S <
£ 1
LU LU
LU
MEASURI
•a
LU
•J
H-
[^
I— •
Z
LU
1
C.
o
U
u
a
min — m CM c-i m r».eo »H «»• r«.
l^ CM V0_ f-l r-4 VO^ vO 0^ N« CM_ -H
^^ ^^ ^O fO t«H fH
^ft CO f*^ ^^ ^D ^^ i^ (^ ^5 ^D ?^ CO
IA »^ ^« \o ?•*• <^ r*4 »^ co co -^ r*^
mfH^ff-CM vCP^-COsOfH ^
*H *H ^C CS *H
i^ O o PH P^) ^ ^ o **y r^» *^ r*^
^-i *-4 vO CN ^
t
p^iriiA^** \O O r** eNt>j n^io r*»
in^ ^ <^ cs CN^ -^ p»» r»» fs^ — i
— 1 f— 1 ^ f-H rM
c^ocom c^ r^ o fsico mrs rn
es^r^vo \o O r*- esj ^ c"m r*«.
» •> * * •
-H 1-1 SO -4 -1
a
1 CO QJ
o u >,
wo o oj
•9 , 00 S — 1
C" U01 CD 03^H*^ 4JC3Ld
«y ,= u e en O-H-HO
t-j ja t3 o) ^3 a. co ST ts a ••>! c cs o >
O3OIO.3Oa> 4) 01 iJ < — U K -H
b ft. = 03 Cu — 4 U Ld iij CO < Su&d U
at
u« u« u-> u^ u j > vi_itl3 IMW u^ u-i uwfiDuj u^
O O O 0 OO) OW OQ) O-O O OS O OT3
T3 -H js a) i-i ai
^ >-< w w u ^ u u«j I* -a u w -3 u u 3
1) 4) 01 0) 0)03 0)-^ 010 0) C 0) 0)E 9) 0)0)
p-S ^2 -^ .O ^c w3 ^ ^20) ,2 ^0) ^ ^"H
g E £ E ECS = w1 B-B £ -J E £ -J S S >
Z Z Z Z Z CC 2 — i Z(0 ZC9 Z ZtD Z ZU
eo
IN
o
E
e
u.
a.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HO 0PM MEDIA: MGMT.
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (R-531) REG. APPRO: ARM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES To develop & operate a resources
management program ror tne Agency (utilizing ZBB principles) including budget
formulation, preparation, and execution (including funding allotments &
allocations); financial management & related services (including developing
and maintaining accounting systems, fiscal controls, and payroll & dis-
bursements systems); and program & budget analysis. To develop & operate
the Formal Reporting System to track programmatic progress, productivity d
efficient resource utilization; also to operate an effective reports manage-
ment program. To develop & disseminate policy & regulations for all grant
programs & assure implementation of guidelines & procedures for the process-
ing & awarding of all grants. To administer grants for programs managed by
Headquarters components & to oversee the review & awarding of grant appli-
cations. Also, maintain coordination & liaison with House & Senate Appropri-
at:.on Committees. Budget Committees, CBO & OMB on budget & program matters.
C) FT-7R ACCOMPLI P^MgK-TS Development of Agency's 5-year plan; formu-
lat.ion & presentation of FY-80 budget (including ZBB) & program plan (includ-
ing participation in the development of Agency's guidance S identification
of major resource issues); formulation & presentation of a proposed FY-79
operating plan; execution of FY-78 operation budget (including quarterly
& nid-year reviews); maintenance & refinement of the Agency's grants* management
system including maintenance of GICS, consolidated grants & processing &
awards of all Headquarters grants; maintenance of the Agency's accounting
s3Tstem & refinement of such systems to provide accrual accounting; provision
of direct payroll support services for all Agency employees & direct fiscal
support services for all non regional components; the Reports Management
Program provided review, analysis & modification of public use reporting
requirements & internal Agency reporting requirements to achieve desired
reduction; maintenance and refinement of the Agency's system for establishing
and reporting against program objectives.
D) FY-79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Integration of the 5-year plan into the ZBI
process; direct implementation of the FY-80/81 ZBB process including increased
analytical & computer support, integration of the resource management systems
(FMS, RM1S, FRS) into the ZBB & participation in cross-Agency ZBB; coordinate
the FY-81 OMB budget submissions, hearings, appeal & passback & provide brief-
ing support for top management; manage the FY-79 budget control & tracking
system, including financial management, to provide oversight on resource
utilization & hold mid and end-of-year budget reviews; provide liaison with
Congress & OMB on budget matters; develop & implement improved system for
tracking Agency programmatic progress, productivity & efficiency of resource
utilization; conduct an effective reports management program; analyze all
proposed standards, regs, and special issues that relate to resource utiliza-
tion; develop & disseminate policy & regulations for all grant programs &
assure implementation of guidelines; administer grants for HQ programs, oversei:
& review awarding of all grants, 6 insure fiscal integrity in the process.
EPA Fern, 2410-10 (&-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ ' MEDlAj PQ M &S
R531 RESOURCES MGT APPRO, AGENCY i REG MGT
***l*Mm*W*fl**M*****v*l*lv"w ***"*** •***•*•>•••• •••*•••••*••••» ••«»«« • • • m
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR ™Y 8o"ctJM
POSITIONS PFT 230.0 2U8.0 183.0 183.0
LEVEL OPFT 17.0 20.0 17.0 17)0
°1 OF l'l FTE 298.5 239,7 239.7
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 5,960.0 8,047.a 5,«52.1 5,452|l
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
At this level, the Office of Resources Management could direct implementation
of the FT-81/82 ZBB process, but with limited ADP support for ZBB and the
Resources Management a Information System (RMIS); coordinate FY-81 OMB
budget submission, hearings, appeal and passback, provide substantive review
of Congressional budget submission and provide necessary support to Admin-
istrator and AA-OPM for Congressional hearings; manage the FY-80 budget
control and tracking system to meet minimal OMB/Congressional requirements
and provide basic oversight of the. utilization of Agency resources with
limited^analyses. The Agency's Formal Reporting System (FRS) for tracking
programmatic" progress will not be maintained at this level, and the reports
management and control system would "process" clearance requests to be
forwarded to OMB with only limited analysis of the reporting burden being
imposed. In the grants area, ORM could provide only the absolutely mandatory
"service functions" with reduced post award central management bearing on
program and fiscal integrity concerns such as cost analyses, audit reviews,
and grant close-outs; maintain the Grants Information Control System (G1CS)
but without regular analysis or reporting, and participate in regulation
development only on a highly selective basis. In financial management, ORM
could provide basic payroll and accounting support activities with some
deterioration of service, and fund control could not be provided beyond
obligations reporting at appropriation and allowance holder level.
The benefits of funding this level are a minimally acceptable resources
management program; with poor budget development, poor resource allocation
and limited ability to track and account for funds; virtually no reports
management and only very limited grant oversight could be provided.
The consequences of not funding this level, are virtually no control or
oversight on budget development, resource allocation, financial management
reports management and grants administration. . . '
EPA Form 2410-11 (B-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
l\ DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HE MEDIAj RG M g,S
R531 RESOURCES MGT APPRO! AGENCY & 'REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY 60 1NCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT • -23o.o 248.0 37.0 220.0
LEVEL OPFT 17,0- 20.0 3.0 20.0
02 OF 11 FTE 296.5 22,6 £62.5
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 5,960.0 6,047.4 1,010,6 '6,462,7
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level adds the ability to provide direct technical assistance to
Regions and Headquarters offices during ZBB process; provide substantial
review of ZBB submissions to determine compliance with guidance and Agency
policy; establish capability to analyze resource requirements for proposed
new standards, regulations, legislation, and resource intensive issues
(such as emergency response study and pesticide labs); initiate efforts
for establishing standardized techniques for comparative program pricing
analysis; provide improved budget cross-walking capability with improved
ADP support for ZBB and HMIS, and provide higher quality responses to
Congressional and OMB requirements. The Agency's Formal Reporting System
•(FRS) for tracking programmatic progress will not be maintained at this
level; in the reports management area, public use reports would be analyzed
for reporting impact. In the grants area, capabilities would be added to
eliminate further backlog in fiscal integrity activities (i.e., cost
analyses, audit reviews, grant close-outs), to participate in interagency
grant policy development (OMB, GSA, and Treasury), and to provide very
limited staff advisory support to consolidated grant implementation and
delegations to States. In financial management, ability would be added to
provide systems and procedural support for payroll and accounting functions;
to provide training and assistance to Regional financial management offices,
and to establish Agency level control over 14 accounting offices under the
Financial Management System (FMS).
The benefits of funding this level would be an improved resources
management program with a higher quality budget submission, more efficient
resource utilization and higher fiscal integrity in all programs.
The consequences of not funding this level are a minimally acceptable
resources management program; with poor budget development, poor resource
allocation and limited ability to track and account for funds; virtually
no reports management and only very limited grant oversights could
be provided.
EPA Form 2410-11 (E-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RM £j DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE
R531 RESOURCES MGT
AND CODE
HO
MEDIAj
APPRO]
PC M &S
AGENCY
REG MGT
Bt RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 11 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY
76 ACT FY
230.0
17.0
5,960.0
9 C. E.
248.0
20.0
2^8.5
8,047.4
FY 80
INCR
14.0
6.0
15,6
462.7
FY
80 CUM
234.0
26.0
278.1
6,925,4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL"ACTIVITIES"OF THfs LEVEL ONLY.~DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level adds the ability to respond to OMB Circular A-76 (acquisition
of commerical and industrial products and services); to provide increased
quality analysis to the ZBB process; begin integration of Agency 5-year
planning into ZBB process; participate in cross-Agency ZBB; conduct mid-
year, third quarter, and end of year budget reviews; provide a higher quality
budget policy activity; improve Agency's ZBB ADP system to be more responsive
to analytical requirements; take on increased budget control responsibilities
(establish employment control system, and related monitoring, etc.); and
provide computer support for new control responsibilities. In the grants
area, restore the ability to participate in and analyze the development of
all grant regulations; to provide special analysis and reporting of GIGS
data, and provide adequate participation in the consolidated grants program.
The benefits of funding this level are a higher quality budget submission
resulting from better analysis and computer support and increased oversight
and review of resource utilization. In the grants area, there would be
increased analysis of grant regulations and special analysis of GIGS data.
The consequences of not funding this level are a lower quality budget
submission to OMB, less efficient resource utilization and less analysis
in the grants area.
T
I
EPA Fom 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAt PG M iS
R531 RESOURCES HGT APPRDj AGENCY t REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 JNCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT -250.0 246.0 254.0
LEVEL OPFT 17.0 20.0 26.0
04 OF 11 FTE 296.5 278.1
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 5*960.0 6,047.« 672.0 7,597,4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level provides $672,000 in consulting and contracting funds for the
items listed below:
1. increased support to Regions for ZBB,
2. cross agency ZBB,
3. increased computer support for ZBB,
4". integration of ORM systems into ZBB (FES, FMS, EM1S) ,
5. support for special projects and special analysis.
The benefits of funding this level are a greatly improved ZBB process
leading to high quality budget decisions and more effective Agency resource
utilization.
Consequences of not funding this level are s. reduced ZBB effort and less
than optimum resource utilization.
78
EPA Font, 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-, OR* 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIA} PG M &S
R531 RESOURCES MGT APPRCj AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT "230.0 248.0 8.0 242.0
LEVEL OPFT 17.0 20.0 4.0 30.0
05 OF 11 FTE 298,5 9,7 287,8
BUDGET AUTH, COOO.O) 5,960.0 8,oa7.U 500.0 8,097.u
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
At this level, will develop and operate the Agency's FY-80 7ormal Reporting
System (FES) that will track agency programmatic progress, productivity
and efficiency of resource utilization. Sigh quality analysis will be
carried out on the data resulting in formal quarterly reports on progress
made against commitments and monthly status reports to top management. In
areas where commitments are being missed, management action reports will be
developed, high-lighting problem areas and recommending solutions. Data
from the system will be "the basis for the Agency's productivity reporting to
OMB and for analysis of resource intensive issues.
The benefit of funding this level is the providing of the Formal Reporting
System and its related analytical reporting on Agency programmatic progress,
problem areas and recommended solutions, effective resource utilization, pro-
ductivity, and resource intensive issues.
The consequences of not funding this level are that there will be no system
or method to track the Agency's programmatic progress or to assess its
productivity and efficiency of resource utilization.
73
E'A Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
RM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R531 RESOURCES
HQ
MEDIA:
APPROj
PC M ts
AGENCY t,
REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
06 OF l1 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E.
230.0 2^6.0
17.0 20.0
296.5
5,960.0 6,047.ti
FY 60 INCR
6.0
2.0
5.6
150.0
FY 60 CUM
208.0
32.0
293.6
6,2*7. 4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level will provide added fund control support through automated commit-
ment system; provide direct systems support to Regional financial management
activities; improve the PMS to meet GAO basic functions requirements; trans-
fer FMS to the COMNTT computer center to permit integration of resources
management systems and to facilitate Regional computer access and establish
a cash management program.
The benefits of funding this level are a more responsive financial manage-
ment system providing better fund control and direct regional access; the
FMS meets GAO basic functions requirements at this level.
The consequences of not funding this level are a less responsive financial
management system with a lesser degree of fund control and fiscal integrity.
EPA Form 2410.11 (6-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE
R531 RESOURCES MGT
AND CODE
HQ
PG M &S
APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
S, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL ' OPFT
07 OF 11 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY
230.0
17.0
5,960.0
79 C. E.
243.0
20.0
8,047%
FY 80 INCR
a.o
a.o
loo.o
FY 80 CUM
252.0
32 o
^ «• | V
297.6
s.5a7.u
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level adds the ability in financial management to provide for review
of unpaid obligations to free multi and no-year funds for use where needed;
review and take action on reports of financial irregularities and provide
training in travel and time keeping practices.
.The benefits of funding this level are that inactive funds can be made
available for present use, fiscal integrity is increased and errors
are reduced in the travel and time keeping areas of the Financial Management
-System (FMS) .
The consequences of not funding this level are that unpaid obligations remain
useless to the Agency, fiscal integrity is questionable, and errors are
introduced into the FMS.
81
EPA Fom 241 (Ml (6-78)
-------
'"OTECTIOM AGENCY
ILt 3U"HARif
IVinmiMEMTAL r
IN UNI ? RESUtir
UJ *•"
CO —
uJ U
*- UJ
_>cn
CL UJ
* in
1981 I7P? J?flJ J980
'E (PLANNING ESTIMATES)
^«
O ^
0- J
X
fr-
W* f^ )
C- UJ
e- c
«••* s
»
u
*•* —
e- »-
*- u
<
ru o rue tro r^ir t-- c
in*- ^ ^ ix o &•« o- ^
o o 90 o- c tr>e o IT
iTitn <£^ * < r* ^ c^
^ in r^cr o »*- a-^- er^
cvo ruo me ^-iri r^-e
ir rvo D- e ^ tr. ^-e
in f* * — eve c-<£ o-*^
oo «o o- a me c IT.
tr> m * ^ * ^> f- f*. 0K-
— IfV f^.Q- 9^» 9^. » ^
- •* • » • * •• ••
rvo rw o tn e »*. tn *•-&
tn »- ^ — ru9 p- -C o>fi
70 9o 0-9 in e o tn
m tn <£ >t> ^> •£> ffc. ^«. Cf^>
»• * in tn o o ^ r^ fw in 9 o o in 9C^-ir>r«-eo»- BC-iri^-eo^> 9 o- in **• o
ru rv P1 o^ <*i **• fr njf^t^ooefv tn. tn &• e 9 ^ «r f«* tr> — in 9 * c r^kn*-orv
tn&-iri^-C'»**'i ^>ir»o — MIV ru r* o-— sc**»iivf* o* •— » M> 9
9^>-4Ov> rv 9 *-- 1*. e- rv ru D-rv»*-9rw iv in rv **i o cv rw e«<^K)ir>rv
«. ». « « ». *b «. « «. *. « «. k. % *»*.*
tn e ir> ^rv« •£>*>* ^ ^, — »^ c. -e — *-
— x> m in e e *^- ^ ^ c D- o o c f* ^ ^ o o * c eo oe oo
rvruo-o*^»s.^ eoep-»-^rv ruru o9^Din ru rutn oe me
tn C" m r-~ w — »*t •- * in f^t K» ry ^ « r^in— 9coo«c >* m — 9 c
e«&*^9ru fu O' ^c *^ 9 r*j ru o «c ^> 9 rv ru e>^Ki9irtrv fr P1 tn ru o- o- in ru
inir tr\ m in in ' mir» m irv m in in ir in
o o o o e
o o e o e
o^-o»»c»-o*»o
•ft ^-AL.U.' *» ^- *t fcu «A ^- 4*. 4*J «A ^k.tL> M ^*
» y_. o: e *^*^ *i^c:o ^*w »u»ao te*-^* • uj cr o %-•« *ujac
u.Tt'JOc u.x^^'C' u.x>^^c fc*.Z«ft^e u. X «ft — e
D*-or««*. o *- ^ r •» •• o**tjz«*» o»-or«»- o«-Ds'*»«-
^c<^« ^o^'^'i'5 r5o<*"» so-i-p — Z x >- •- »-2»«>-« ^-2X>-« »-zx>-*-
•J WJ *• U.1 < ^- _ J UJ «« UJ * ^~ »J UJ •• UJ < ^ J UJ •• i*J * ^- W U* ** Ui' ^ ^*
>c, *»Kr >o *-m >o »-•« >C »-K >o •-»
UJ — ^> O U.' D ^ C UJ^ S C UJ ^ ^ O UJ X" S C
«i C C C. «f tE O a _i C O t. _J C OCL — 1 C CO.
-------
z e
o «
— x
i- r
u 2
uj z
w
o> ~
« o
^
•5 o
P^
O
13 O9
Z UJ
z c
z =
_J OS
a. u
a:
'C' 3*S
* w»» w Fn
^ in
— nr
o- •»
— CO
r
e>
cues
1C Z
o- —
~2
e x
e uj
o- a
2
c- a
— o:
c •*
» t-
rvi
•
o
W IV
• •
^. o
a ^
ru «
e N.
IV •£
v
r^> in •• o A *M »**
9 ^ 6 f*. a1 KI fr
9 •£ O ^ in ^> <
o e
o e
in o o e
e-
o c
o o
e o
o- »
in in in
a-« —
in - 3 r « —
30 « - «"
o ~" •- «j o
— Z X >• ••
—i UJ •» UJ « *"
> a >- «
UJ S O C
-i e o u
o
o
o ^
•• »- U. I
— >-* _» « u. CL c
— « o c. o i
. uj cr o — •
u. I en r o
O «- 3 Z «• —
~ O < — C5
<~ < s n: z
e *• es o
•»• z x >• •-
J UJ «-UJ < >-
UJ C5 ••• *^ j wri
> e •- «
UJ 2 SO
c u.
-------
u
UJ
C3
U
LU
h_
O
c:
2 >
si
II
> «
2 w
UJ
2
LU
IT
O
H*—
it.
S Ct
g^
< O
eg
s<
Z
Cu
0
_ tt
O uj
^
I
tZ
S^*
5—1
z
Z
2u
to
Id
^^
=5
O
to
W
a:
^~~~
UJ
O
0
u
0
z
2,
UJ
"
•Z
^
^"
2
Z
o
UJ
0
<
tn
H"
Z
LU
§
C.
s
O
u
u
3;
5
o
CO
e>
^
^^
u.
****
s
J
1
— J
UJ
^
UJ
in
.
UJ
UJ
_J
J
•J
UJ
^
UJ
4
!
**~
UJ
LU
_J
_ J
LU
UJ
j
l^
UJ
_J
en
p^
CJ •}
O
> c
u. c.
UJ
H
CO tf
•^ ^*
i i
>...
Vi
U. UJ
UJ
cr
7ft
2
&
ce
UJ
-J
f»
r*
H*
z
LU
5
5
E!
2
o
u
<
0
o m CM i micMveco
p^ • *^i rn *^ *s P^ i^
CD ^) ^ f^l
cs
^i ^^ ^^ i in t ^i ^D c^ ^^
^) • ^H P^ ^^ ^H r*^ ^\
CO d*l iH CO
CM
O mcMi >nocM*ooo
eo r^ o !••< fi
CN »H
O
*""
O m CM i m i i i in cs
C^i • ^H P^ ^5 m
?^ P^ f^H P^)
CM
eo m O i m i i i o O
CM 1-1 cn vc <•
co PH *•< CM
CM
o r^ cn i m i i i in o
CM PH in ^
P^ *"^ CM
CM
-
•«• m r^ o in I I i o O
CM co pn in ^*•
i— 1 CM
P1^ »
O
m «M i m i CM \o o o
O -i-i pn ^i^ir~«<-
p^ r**. r^ *H CM
CM
CM r*t *H in *?
P*l iH CM
CM
J. 0) * 4J 1
i i i-i i "o o> «H te «
O tB CO •H W ^ > JJ Q) X
hU>4JCC — 1 03 — 1 01
O.-H 0) >, iJ •= • U < >
u-i -HCC -0 • U E BH -U
B3-H" Cfiweg 01 C 3 CS Cu E 3
e AJ 3 E E J-1 ij ij -g u 01 o;
Nl 03 0) COOitC 01 E O 60 -H ^
3-^1 O 1—10) W O to CO i— i
c — i > o -M o -^ a. E o> u M ij ce
AJ ^^« 0) ^ 0) AU to E E O. U 3
CW > 3OO-O -ufl) BE
•OO •301T3 CU^H OJ JJ 6) a, EC
OI*HC o) *o o ^c jj -H CUB o 03
o cc •-< ono ""lo to EE«« AJ ft. . > E > 3 B5 01 B. AJ a' -H 01 U
OJ E — i oi a) oioi n AJ c. a> oc -3 x u Q a
•COlBOtO tJAJ T3-H K i^tO -O BLj -H3 0)
COE> 00 > fiOLrf*3COCO
no>^-io K x DOI CM AJ « . AJ coo oj c AJ ?-, 03
b u AJ i-i pn tj b eo 01 o) o ^-< E o AJ w WIH AJ
cca.toa.to to -~« oc AJ AJ E w&.oto 3
a) MO. 01 ve a) n: i-i -3CCO) jsca a. w to c. c o
X AJ 0) re X X = CO 3 Oi 32 C 60 3tfi OltS I
loia, itc 10 i .as* no AJ E cr AJ u 01
LJ*Q E UvH U AJ fa uj oi AJ i£O XHVM IAJ O U-IQ) O
O3-OCO C -S OtO O )- C AJ O Oi OO. C 0 -H
3 ^ E .3 3 3 -i .It 01 D. M 01 E O jv i
i— 1 " O ^0! >H6B -H OlbCAJ i— IU OJ^ 0) 0114 AJ D
snc^-i tc to-oi — < j s o oi o xi ^ ce ^o o E
AjnOAJ jji-i AJ u JQ EW-^ > cu En E AJ Sol cs
H O AJ 3 u. o Ht« Cu Z*UCC a U 2 AJ 2 T3 ZU U
.^
05
i
flo
CN
£
^
fN
0
IL,
6.
-------
u
UJ
O
LU
h-
o
e
a.
p
!
> w
Z w
LUH
LU
Crt
O
z
z
g
53
o
UJ
'C
O
u.
*
i<
.. Cu
< O
UJ £t
S <
?
o .
_ o
C uj
— C
^MM^
^
*n
m
j
ai
H
z
Ed
a
z
2?
CO
Id
U
BS
3
O
V3
•d
ci
.M
UJ
a
o
a
z
^
•—
UJ
L_
H
H-
Z
^2
0
5/3
U
UJ
Q
<
.
Z
LU
M
3
2
0
u
LU
_j
^
s
31
e?
o
i—
>.
u.
^
:5
j
_J
UJ
>
ID
J
•J
UJ
LU
j
LU
LU
1
LU
^
LU
-J
CNJ
LU
>
UJ
j
UJ
^"
UJ
-J
en
en _,-
•" o
> e
U. 0.
UJ'
1-
o <
i i
^_
^" W5
U. LU
UJ
e
3
co
^
LU
2
O » •> •» iH ••
O IH r- «n
O> in iH rH
ooomooooo
o -a-oooooo
tn • • • r-> •
O — i m m
ao m - iH 1-1
ooomooooo
O CN-HOOOOO
^y i"H o O O ^i r^
en • • • rt •
o ^ o «n
r*^ in iH * I«H
oo<-oooooo
-C* O f^ *• ( O O ^4 *A ^
f^ CO * * * ^H *
O *"4 CO ^O
O u-t *H ^H
fH
oo-c-oooooo
f^) GO * * f"** ^H *
O i-< en
O m -H
^H
1 -C T3 -0
ai s-i 01 a) i
x a m u o I-H
COQJ2? CO 03 tQO » JJ ^
s co ts aicaa u a> c eg
— 1 > • U -3 I) U U -H C9 CS >fl
Ti^-*au OWU O C 03 S U
3 J_> O •= 1- O Si. u-i O C - — i CO
-H ca -H a a. u uo -o a w> ^
CJU4J D. >i
osua o jj u MXO htse o> «
— i 13 a. o c: a — i u a. u « u a.
u « -M as y — J i— i a JJ uv>
u -v. ws j aocg aea a ao x o>
C3 ^ 3 CD ^H ^ *r^ 03 O 4J *0 ***>» Lrf 0)
C3 - ^2 U -H U O U C M 3 >.
ij SO— < — i u « C CO) 0> •" O CO 03 O
c d) cd M CB *j cs y ^j 5 y *o 03 c * *^
W-H>JJ HO) ea a -H c xw a 010 a.
u on 3 ij — i o) -H « 3 cgui u u — i E
t)0 ^ W *H ^ {Q UM E *^ ^^ ^ &t -U > "^ 4J 0)
oo a. -o u 01 o c 'CD o
U-fCa. CO UprfC/3 U^QO LU U^j'O LUO LWCQ LM*vM U4JJ
o -^ o "3 ^ o on o co o a) ou co) o -H o c
Li 03 3 S u o = « Ew E3 £0 Eca Ecr E O En
3)iO)3O 380 3O SO 3U 3U 3a 30) 3u
Z a. u o -; z to zu zu Z a. z oo Z-H Z i- Zta
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ 0PM MEDIA: MGT
Planning, Evaluation & Analysis (R533) REG- APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
To provide the National model for Regional Office use of analysis and project
management skills to help the Regional Administrators to develop integrated"
strategies for developing strong state environmental programs and to tackle
difficult problems requiring sophisticated analysis and implementation.
These staffs will help design new initiatives in regulatory and management
reform, improving State and local environmental program performance, inte-
grating our programs at all levels, and providing in-depth analysis of the
issues and choices that face a region.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
This activity is established in FY 79,
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
This activity will begin during FY 79. One Region will receive six head-
quarters positions to establish a "Regional Project Center." The r&sources
for other regions are reflected in a separate Regional Decision Unit (533) .
A carefully selected staff of analysts from several disciplines will be
chosen for this center. While located in one Region and responsible to the
Regional Administrator, the other RA's and Headquarters 0PM win participate
it planning the center's analysis agenda. 0PM will use this center as the
model for other Regions of how a critical mass of analytical/project manage-
ment capability can be used to deal with regional problems and build strong
state/local programs. The Agency's FY 80 budget request includes resources
tc expand this capability to the other regions, though their precise
structures and agendas will depend on the FY 79 experience with the model
Regional Project Center.
8S
EPA Form 2410-10 (8.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE " HQ"~ ""*MEDI AT"?™"™"""""""
R533 PLANNING, EVALUATION & ANALYSIS APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
S. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY0
POSITIONS PFT . 6.0 6.0 b.o
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 01 FTE 6.0 6.0 6.0
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O) 150.0 150.0 150,0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
The Regional Project Center serves as the national model for the application
of analysis and innovative management in the Regional Offices. It provides
staff and dollar resources for Regional development of alternative manage-
ment and regulatory solutions to environmental problems based on geographic,
organizational, or political factors indigenous to a specific Region. The
Regional Project Center will enhance the Regional Administrator's ability
to plan an integrated environmental program and to tackle and resolve diffi-
cult analytical problems (i.e., expanded State/RA agreements; strengthening
integrated environmental programs in States; evaluating Regional, State, and
local pollution control programs; developing and implementing compliance
strategies for automobile-related ozone non-attainment areas; and developing
approaches for dealing with heavily impacted industries concentrated in a
given Region). While serving the analytical needs of the Region, tile
Regional Project Center also serves as a pilot test for analytical units to
be placed eventually in all or most EPA Regions. In that capacity the RPC
coordinates its agenda and organization with other Regional planning and
management staffs, as well as the Office of Planning and Management at
Headquarters.
Benefits
Allows continuation of the model Regional Policy Center established in FY 79.
Such a prototype center is designed to correct a serious management and
analytical deficiency in EPA's Regional operations. A substantial portion
of EPA's program activities are administered by the Regions which, because
of heavy day-to-day operational pressure, normally must devote full-time
attention to non-analytical matters. Continuation of the Regional Project
Center provides a small critical mass of staff and dollar resources to
support the Regional Administrator's efforts to plan a managerial strategy
for dealing with tough regional environmental problems requiring analytical
and project management skills.
Consequences of Not Funding
The model Regional Project Center established in FY 79 would have to be
terminated, making it very difficult to recruit top-flight staff to the Center
and reducing significantly the likelihood that the model will demonstrate how
analysis can help the Regional Administrators.
87
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
u
UJ
c:
Z cr
c <
•— z
C UJ
c u
CL. C
_ o
< R
«- UJ
z c
c z
B —
» r
z c
cr
tr —
C
u. I.
2. Z
LJ C
ts —
2 ^
•s r
< z
_) <
C. -J
c.
c in
— cc
ru cs
e. z
— 2
Z
C UJ
o- a
c- u
*-
e> c
c
a.
c-
e
o o
in in
o o
in in
o e
• •
e e>
o < o a. o k.
• uj a: o *^ w
u. r to 2 e
D — r> r •» —
~ O * ** V>
— < = c -z.
e •- en o
•- 2 X >- «.
— UJ « •-
» O
C D.
OO'S
> C
UJ —
-------
z
LU
O
h-
U
LU
O
c
a.
_i
<
K
z >
9i
S: D
> ^
Z "3
"z
LU
52
3
CL
O
O
o
t
z
s
z
o
o
LU
o
'EC
O
LL
H 2
£3
.. CL
< O
s <
s
0.
o
22
M
r-i
cti
^B*
OB
•H
0}
— — ^
LU C9
o e
o <
u
Q
< s
LU U
_J to
H- 3
t|
2
3 -
ECISION
Lanning
Q OM
<
(A
Z
LU
£
a.
5
O
u
u
H
^
jJ
5
o
03
O
.„
LL.
LU
LU
_J
LU
LU
_J
Ul
^
-J
1
•^
Ol
Ul
Ul
>
Ul
j
Ul
LU
_J
r^
ffl -i
- o
> C
LL £.
LU
H
**• S
o a
LL LU
LU
e
3
C/3
^
LU
2
C0
LU
K
H*
i
Z
LU
2
*
c/:
CCOMPLI
<
CD
-
i— (
-
-H
1
•a
0)
JT
o
^
,a
td
a
01
j^
u
e
QJ
y
JJ
U
-n ei
O £
u — I
to
i-l U
tO QJ
c a,
0 O
oo -o
ft) C
as a
CO
rv
CD
f<4
0
|
O
LL
^
a.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORV 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Planning, Evaluation & Analysis (R-533)
HQ
REG.
MEDIA: MQMI%
APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The objective of this decision unit is the provision of a strong base of
analysis to support regulatory decisions and management processes vithin the
regional offices. This management and analytic capability is key to
regional efforts in regulatory and management reform, in improving State
and local programs, and finding successful ways to plan and manage environ-
mental programs. Some specific activities include the preparation of
regional operating plans and budget estimates, economic analysis, program
evaluations, management analysis relating to program and organizational
reviews, planning, budgeting and analytical technical assistance and
training, evaluation of information systems and needs, coordination of
activities among Agency, state and other federal agency personnel, and
coordination- of regional participation in Agency regulation development.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Accomplishments in F7-78 include conversion from incremental budgeting
to zero based budgeting (ZBB) in formulating FY-79 operating plans and
F7-80 Budget Estimates, training of program managers in methods, maintenance
of the Formal Planning and Reporting System, position controls, performing
program and management evaluations in problem areas and organizational
revampings. (Note that the FY-78 focus was much more on routine functions
than will be the case in FY-79/80 when analytical functions will be
increasingly emphasized.)
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Economic analysis will be emphasized as determining factor in Agency
actions, especially for assessment of non-compliance penalties and
enforcement activity. Better information systems (ADP) will be developed
and existing systems reviewed. Regions will have greater impact on Agency
guidance strategies and regulatory development. ZBB procedures will be
more refined, have better quality control, address workload performance
measures, consider cost-effectiveness nationwide, and involve state environ-
mental agencies more thoroughly. An important feature of the FY-79 plan is
the establishment of one "Regional Project Center" in a region yet to be
designated. This Center is intended to provide a critical mass of care-
fully selected analytical and management talent which will enable the region
in which it is located to deal creatively and systematically with problems
of regulatory and management reform, with stimulating better performance in
State and local environmental programs, and with integrating program
activities at all levels. This Center will serve as a pilot model for a
similar infusion of new analytical and project management capability in the
remaining regions during FY-80. FY-80 resources for this Center are included
in a separate headquarters decision unit. _
EPA Form 2410-10 (6-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'ORM 2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG
R533 PLANNING, EVALUATION & ANALYSIS APPROI AGENCY i REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT . 67.0 73.0 56.0 56.0
LEVEL OPFT tt.O 5.0 2.0 2.0
01 OF 10 FTE 80.1 67. A 67.4
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 1/080.0 1,911. a 1,610.3 1,610.3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This decision unit includes a variety of analytical activities which are
performed in each Regional Office to support the management of the region.
Specific activities include the preparation of a. ZBB Budget, preparation of
an annual regional operating plan, monitoring and reporting on accomplish-
ments, 'participating in strategy development, evaluation and budgeting of
data systems, program evaluation, management analysis of organizations and
processes, preparation and review of economic and energy analyses, management
of regional involvement in Agency regulatory and management reform efforts,
providing overall coordination of the activities among Agency, State, local
and other Federal personnel, and coordination of participation in regulation
development. While different regions would take slightly differing approaches
to operating at this minimal resource level, virtually all effort wquld
necessarily be directed to the coordination and preparation of input for those
required management and administrative processes which are imposed upon the
region by headquarters, other Federal agencies, and other external sources.
Only very little time or effort could be devoted to analytical work on manage-
ment or program issues. Activities accomplished at this level include sub-
mission of ZBB budget materials, preparation of operating plans, coordination
of ADP systems, monitoring and reporting performance data, preparation of
quarterly economic dislocation reports, and review of strategies, and
regulations on request.
Benefits
This level would provide the regions with the capability to prepare budgets,
plans and a few limited analyses to fulfill the requirements of mandatory
management and administrative processes.
Consequences of Not Funding
The regions would not have a centralized management capability for budgeting,
evaluation and analysis. These functions would have to be absorbed by
headquarters and the program divisions in the Regional Office.
Q1
>/ JL
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DRM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL A
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEUlAj PG M &S
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION s. ANALYSIS APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 10 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)
FY 76 ACT
. 67.0
«.o
1,060.0
FY 79 C. E,
73.0
5.0
60. 1
l,9n. a
FY 80 INCH
11.0
1.0
6.9
605.1
FY 80 CUM
67.0
3.0
74.3
2, 215, a
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
At this level the regions would be able to increase the amount of time and
effort available for work on analyses and projects which would influence
regional program operations and policies. Specifically more work would be
done on economic analyses to support EIS review, SI? impacts, non-compliance
penalties, and enforcement options; evaluations of regional program per-
formance; ^increased participation in guidance and strategy development;
expansion of ADP reviews and some special analyses and projects.
Benefits
This level allows for greatly enhanced program evaluation capabilisies In
most regions allowing findings of in-depth evaluations of programs, organi-
zations, resource utilization, efficiency levels and accomplishments to be
fed back into Agency planning/budget cycle. Additional state/EPA coordina-
tion in planning and budgeting as reflected in this level will foster a
unified state/EPA approach to environmental problems with resultant elimina-
tion of duplicative programs. Expanded economic analysis will allow Agency
to assess impact of its environmental and regulatory actions as well as
those of other federal agencies on industries, municipalities, growth
patterns, inflation. Additional regional input to Headquarters' reviews and
studies would permit specific regional implementation experiences to impact
Agency planning and strategizing ADP reviews will allow expanded resources
savings and efficiencies as well as more centralized, available and valid
data bases.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level will seriously impair the Regions' ability to fully
participate in and influence Agency planning and budgeting processes. The
analytical staff in each region would, of necessity, have to devote vir-
tually all of its attention to required management processes; there would be
insufficient staff to work on programmatic issues and economic analyses.
92
EPA Fern. 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION & ANALYSIS
RG
Aj PG M &
APPROj AGENCY
REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL ' OPFT
03 OF 10 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000,0)
FY 7B ACT FY 79 C. E.
67.0 73 ..0
' 4.0 5.0
80.1
1,060.0 1,911.4
FY 80 INCR
7.0
2.0
6.8
164.0
FY 80 CUM
7a,o
5.0
81.1
2,399.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Only 2 regions receive increases at this level. Region III will expand
economic analysis capabilities to assist states and assess non-compliance
penalties, regulatory impacts; Region X will focus on improvements in
AD? planning, system reviews and training for Regional program managers.
Benefits
This level provides a needed economic analysis capability in Region III,
and one analyst in Region X to review ADP systems.
Consequences of Not Funding ,
In Region III, failure to fund would eliminate the Region's ability to
assess the impact of its environmental actions, and other Federal agencies',
on industry, municipalities, growth patterns in Region III areas. In
Region X, there would be no means of prioritizing ADP needs or assuring
effectiveness of existing or proposed systems.
93
EPA form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
0PM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIA: PC M iS
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION & ANALYSIS APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT . 67.0 73.0 6.0 80.0
LEVEL OPFT 4.0 5.0 5,0
04 OF 10 FTE 60.1 6,0 87.1
BUDGET AUTH, (000,05 1,080.0 1,911.4 150,0 2,549.4
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level would provide fifteen nev positions to two regions which would
be used for carefully selected analysts and management specialists taken
from several disciplines. This infusion of a core force of new talent
will be patterned after the "Regional Project Center" which is being
established as a pilot model in FY-79. This significant increase to the
Regional management staff is designed to provide the means by which the
regions can creatively work on regulatory and management reform, stimulate
State and local agency performance and improve the coordination of
their activities, integrate the activities of different program areas
to increase their effectiveness, find innovative approaches to Regional
environmental problems, and provide in-depth examination of program
issues. This additional capability in the two Regions will be a Jtey
factor in the development and selection of the options that the Regions
must have available in order to optimize environmental decision making
and the management of environmental programs.
Benefits
This level will provide the resources to two Regions for an infusion of
analytical/management talent. As this effort was initiated in a different
Region during FY79 with the establishment of the "Regional Project
Center," with this level a total of three Regions will have received
this infusion of new talent.
Consequences of Not Funding
If not funded, only the Region with the FY79 Project Center will have
received the increase in talent. Nine Regions would not be able to
fulfill their new roles in regulatory and management reform and integrating
Federal State and local programs.
EPA Form 2410-11 (6-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'
'ORM 2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIA} PQ M &S
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION I ANALYSIS APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT feT.O 73,0 15.0 95.0
LEVEL OPFT u.O 5.0 1.0 6.0
05 OF 10 FTE 80.1 12,8 99.9
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 1,080.0 1,911.a 375.0 2,92«.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level would provide the resources for one additional Region to add
a force of analytical/management talent, for a total of four Regions
with this capability.
Benefits
Four Regions would have this increased capacity for management and
analysis.
Consequences of Not Funding
t
Only three Regions would have the enhanced analytical and management
capability.
EPA Font, 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OR1- 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIA: PG M &S
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION & ANALYSIS APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
06 OF 10 FTE
'BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 76 ACT
67.0
«.o
lf 080.0
FY 79 C. E.
73.0
5.0
80. 1
1,911.4
FY 80 INCR
25.0
1.0
22.2
625.0
FY 80 CUM
120.0
7.0
122.1
3,5«9.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
COR* 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RQ MEDIAj pg M &s
R533 PLANNING,EVALUATION & ANALYSIS APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY PO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 67.0 73.0 20.0 140,0
LEVEL OPFT o.O 5.0 7.0
09 OF 10 FTE . 80.1 16.7 138.8
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 1,080,0 1,911,4 500,0 4,049.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THI CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level would provide the resources for three additional Regions to
add a core force of analytical/management talent. At this level, all
Regions would have this capability.
Benefits
Each of the 10 Regions would have the increased capacity for management
and analysis.
Consequences of Not Funding
Only seven Regions would have the enhanced analytical and management
capability.
Q7
W.J
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
>•
Z
c
>.
Z £
C <
-. r
u 5
UJ CC
& uJ
a u
•j c
« to
z a
£ —
2 —
O Z
> z.
Z ^
••
mj
*£
2
«;
•£
&
#fc
Z>
^
5^
UJ
*h
2
CO 2
B <
U b.
a: vi
«• in
t cc
cc
c-
cc
— in
UJ
UJ
c z
_ 2
Z
_J
L.
CC
er
UJ
o —
— 3
X
t>
_
H
e r
O uj
t> cc
— u
z
*-
C- UJ
o c:
u;
J^ 5
t> *••
— u
<
fi in
o —
<£> a
v* *-
F^ tf>
C —
— CC
O —
— c
<_ «•
— c
»*> o in o o c
C O O ~- .cD fW *-
•- f*- C C* IT *C
O 4T V
^ — ^
c ^ o — * »v *-
*^ |>^ o C J/^ <£
*C tA ft
*. ^ %
•* •• «••
o- w e in o o — -
••• *••• cQ1 tr» »*• t&
D- « fU ^
o o * o e
c. o f* ^ a
o e o-
--
^*«
e
o
o *-
•» ^ u. u;
o^ ^* ^ <-» u. &. ^*
• UJ & C »•* *—
y. I C5 D e
o P- r> r •* —
r o < ~ cr>
— < X cr z
O ^~ K O
»- Z x >• *•
1 ^ M* tl i 4 ^»
UJ » «^ W. _J «
> O »- «n
UJ 3 SO
—1C OB.
B rw
in e
rw c
rw ru
B ru
y*t cc
«• V)
rw o
ni rw
B rw
in* cc
•• Vl
rw c
rv rw
B rw
in cc
•• VI
rw o
% ^
rv ru
-
~
0 B o rw o e v>
in in & CD f^> Vv B
rw v vi e
rw— rw
— — e> »- o e o-
in •* es * — — •£
o e o in —
o « c c
o o vi *». tr
co cc e «
e e o
— -
e
e
« ^ u. u
O •- .Jj ^> U. C. •-
u. r cr, r e
O — » S in "
r> o «c >-> cr.
rw < r tr z
c •- to c
«- Z x >- —i
_J UJ •• U « *-
> e »- «B
uj => r> o
_( CE OL.
B m
o- >»
0- e
vi rw
rw ru
B m
c- *-
c- c
vi rw
rw rw
o ir>
o- t-
e> e
VI ffv
rw ru
B in
e-" t^
p- e
vi rw
ffc Cfe,
ru rw
B B e in e e —
vi o vi ru
ru rw cc
B B e e- f- rw «
CD tn vi «
•• •• *•
B B o in e e -•
_ — o cc vim o
— »- a in r- c
O- * «v »-
o c « e e
0 O VI ^ B
CC CO O ^>
o e e-
--
9
e
O t-
m >• u. IAJ
• lu c e *•* *^
u. x «s s e
o •- ax «* •
5 C « » n
vi < x e z
C ^ Cft O
•- Z X >- —
uj is •* ^ _*••
> e >- cr>
UJ 35 SO
JC DC.
B in
C- IT.
B B
in v,
ru rvi
B in
o- in
B 9
in vi
rw ru
B »*
f in
B B
IT VI
ru ru
B m
r> in
B B
in vi
4h fe
ru ru
B'B e in c o —
in —vi vi
rw rv ru >
c e e e e
= C V> IA O
— »»• B m »» e/
0- * rwf-
e e « e e
o e vi r* B
cc- cc o *
e c c-
— -
e
e
e ^
M >- U. UJ
• UJ d o ^^ %^
U. X *C S B
»- => r •» -
r> c < >x B
B < X C Z
c >- cr> c
•- z >« >- —
_1UJ — UJ < —
uj ts —»» _* —
> C •- *5
uj r; so
_>CC O (X
B in
a c
ru r>
C- •£•
ru ru
B in
B e
ru o-
r> •*
ru rw
e in
B C
rw c-
0- •£,
ru rw
B in
B O
rw C-
c* x
« »
rw rw
B o e IT. e
B B C O in
ru in »- c- c-
e^ in vi *
ru «v rw
0 O O C
in in in «n
*- f- B —
VI VI v»
B B Oin C
— — o CC VI
•• v>» B m ^^
-- J
e o * e
e e vi t-
cc cc c- *
e e o-
--
o
o
o
<• >-
• UJ CE O
u. X tn s> e
c •- s r •» —
r o « «~ »3
ir«« x «r z
e *- n o
•- Z >c >- —
UJ CS «p«^»_J —
uj a so
_ie o c.
^
w
C
00
-------
>•
w
s
kW
a
<
>•
z c
o <
p- z
p- z_
kw to
C IU
C l_>
&. £r
..>
-j c
« CO
«- lu
•z tx
z p"-
Z "
O Z
a s
> z
2 O
tu •>•
00
u> -•
yj W
*— t^J
< C
K>
C
•- c
Z Ik.
CO
tf9
^
_J
<
«
•*
Z
c
<
Zj
>
ku
o
z
« z
z z
o «
C "• ->
SUB.
<>-J
& •»>
Kl
«- in
a. cr
a
cc
c>
cc
c> —
— «
hk«
*K
«
X
PI4
CR
U
IV tt
CCi Z
o «•
• • z
<
a.
(C
^
•M
UJ
^
Nw
O *-
C <
C- .J
— =>
^
^
«-
z
UJ
e z
cc tu
c> a
— LJ
Z
•-
O lu
^
c- a
u
j
p^ 2
O p-
"*
a in
cr in
9 *
IT (VI
pn »»>
sr in
t> «n
a *
in nj
to »^
a in
• •
e- m
a -o
in ftj
• ^
r* Ki
a in
t> in
a <
in e in o p- P»I •»>
e. cc oo ooofu
»r\j min mm»-r\i
•• IW *\l f* Al fVl
< « in
O — IT JT C IT> O O —
mo ••••ocDftino
c — 1» a in p- co
o -B nt f-
o 00*00
a o o •->»*. a
cc cc o *
e e o
» «
e
O
»- 0 «-
kk. kU CM P- U. kU
— O U. — < O O- C U.
^^%^ •UJtEO w^'
u. u. z > O p- Ift
1.1 ku 3 ~ O
-j _i m o a.
= tn
o- in
a ni
0 »»
a «-i
a in
t> m
a cv
e ^-
a p*
a in
• *
o- in
a (v
^ v
a »*
a in
o in
a «M
o •«.
^ •>
a »*
a a e in o o co
o- o- o in o f~ cc
a r>. r- ni a >-^
o o»>^. ~ —
» •> »
«T l»l t-1
o o e e r-
o o o o *
c e -o »w —
10 in a
a a o in o o —
— •- o eo »*< in o
— >» a in ^. cc
Cf « «vr-
o o
« «
o
0 »~
M P- tk, u
O *^ _> ^» Ik CX P^
— < O 0- O kU
• uj or o «-» *p»
u. x «o 3 e
o -- z> i «• —
= o < «•« co
t> •< x et z
0 P- CO O
>- Z x >- »
^J kU ••• IU ^ •*•
UJ O »»•-' _J P-
> e p- «o
iu s n o
_i tr co.
-------
2
O
K
O
UJ
t-
O
c:
Z >
S" c
II
li
"
UJ
2
UJ
O
U
o
D
O
UJ
Q
HS
Oef.
E<
.. c.'
< O
ll
X
_ C3
O UJ
f
i?
PI
in
o:
****
to
05
f-i
|f
i =
1-2
•u
2*
*•<-<
H«
tw
Z „
= to
11
5 £
ga
<
en
t—
Z
UJ
M
3
c.
5
O
u
u
UJ
5
o
e
e>
>.
u.
fx
U.
CS
rx
a
>
u.
u
C
0
<
U
«
a
u
t
t
t-
2
u
•
•
c>
£
<
C
L
<
0
UJ
UJ
_J
J
I
J
UJ
LU
H
_i
UJ
^
UJ
h
^J
u
UJ
J
H
«J
UJ
>
UJ
UJ
UJ
.
&.
H
<
5
«fl
u
u
0
5
•)
c
J
5
j
j
»
j
!
J
5
;
j
r
k
2
OMO -H in vOrM vrco
msTvOrx \O^IX.P^
Orxo tH m vorx, «jrec
P^ sff JJ5 PX, \o ^\ ^^ ^
"H iH
O(N\e »-^ m vocx «ceo
f*i XT so ex. \0 Q^ f^, (q^
-1 ^H
SSvc S ""* So! Srn
•H iH
Oexvo o\ m vein * tu Diu —^ — : C —^iu
O-H c U 4J >H iH05^-l(CC E E £0)
t-i-c c> o B g. aiai>^ M we £e
J>5 CD UJ >>E >O-H»J a) CIO CJ 5
> O CC C *O tD "H CO 0) "*H *y CO o JJ j_> ^j j i ^
OJ-H c ^tcy oJ-o-new-^ ai QJJJ o
~ GO - g JJ —< /-K to C^HOE •^•1C3 "OO
U E rJOCO* COCO-rl "DC CO •— 1 -H
3 "O 3 -o O-U WXtOb-O iJC JJO-So
«« C CC*HV (BteuEu -H &, o c
•H.C a soec JJS-HUIJOI eoujeoaJmo
>*J E U CU • tB O •— i ^-( 0) 3 ?S)C3O
O1 *"( t3£C/? "O^JCBUjJ^W CJS>sCU.££OJ&)0>
o e co) toM user ooa> > ft. >EJJ ">eu
s^ ^ « ss mu T!^-, •u_— "^ -l OE
UJ*SJJ C8C OE "B» MiJC CiWWS C<~l C i— f O CO
WCS! 60O JJU COW O-HO tBUOJET 0-rt O-^*J OO
DOW WO 3*J ^C W3W 0)CO4) U.O OjO-H OC
eoccx ••c> o toe
UJU-H ujo) UJ03 uj •• *o Ujcuc un«oe uj • ujmw uj
OOC O«H O O-OJ O •H Q) O01 O OtB O» OBJ
' — TJ "0 C ft) 4J T3 JJtB^J E E-H E
••OS '3 • O • • C -360 -CSOiiJ -W .WO »W
OCT3 OJJ O^ O-HO) OJJC OJJiHc8 O-H 0-HW O--I
Z«< Z
-------
o
LU
O
<
2
g
t-
u
LU
2 >
LU £••
> «n
2 en
LUH
UJ
O
u
o
O
LU
Q
•101
H S
§ <
.. a.'
< O
LU c.
S <
X
O
O LU
^^
r-i
i/^
•£
s^r
to
tn
*« fH
UJ CO
o e
o<
u
ii
LU JJ
-J to
K 3
= ta
Z
3 .
DECISION
lannlng
Q a*
<
CO
Z
LU
«f»
en
Q.
•ej
O
o
u
LU
3
O
§
0
>.
LL
LU
LU
_J
LU
LU
LU
^
LU
UJ
>
LU
U
LU
>
LU
3
UJ
ai
r*
" O
> S
u. a.
LU
K
r» S
en 5
> 5)
U. LU
LU
C
3
tfl
^
LU
S
oB
LU
_J
«
H"
. _
Z
i
3
iCCOMPLI
«. ^
K
r" i i t w
•o w i CD i ecu o> OS a .u
01 s to EI a. s a> o c so c — i
£L tU S 0)0> Q**QOfiu^ «*^ ^HCJ ^4lu
O-H S M AJ — I — —i U he I- C
4) e 00 *^4 • X S ^ CJ i>^ ^H Ol CU O 01 CD
>o to BT3 to-H cncij'H'otau u AJ-H JJJ3
tui-i e -H a CD -o -a c u — i AJ Eucu> ctjOiHiHO) 3 3 w E 3 y
a) -^ Dfcn -3 AJ « uj j: u oixoi^oioioi
u u to -om-^o 3 JJ-H -HWi-itse-H
o e eo) COM u^crooo) >o.>Su >oi
oiw o . a -H I- cj -HOI u— CD cucooiu
O 1-IT3 ^38) AJ-S-H -ajJ WOL4OCU(-iS
Q o) to AJ o) AJ L* 05 E jj o) to fio to o o e u *^
= iJ . MCJ AJ 02 tOU EtOC CO CU i^X -H >, i-l iH^H
L4CJM-H3 ffl 3 S« CO U S - — ' CO EJJ E J-i ECk
030 e-o ECB cr I-XE o — < c eu C-H Q •* ** o s
VM-OAJ COC OS "O . SJOiJS CS.COU3 C-H C-^O CO
u c a eo o AJ oi o en c — i o oiucucr 0-4 O-HAJ ou
«u o u u y 3 o toe
u^ Lrf IH u«j (j) u^ co ^^ •• "3 ^J ^} c uj * cj C 'AJ •• u^ CO U u^
ooe O-H o o-'O) 0-^41 04> o on o- o*
~^-H -o e UAJ TS AJCB-H E E-H s
••OE -3 • O • • E . 3 00 . CO CD AJ • W . >- O -W
oe^ OAJ O-H o-HD OAJC OAj-rtrt o — < O-HM o-^
Z 03 < Z CO Z AJ Z^-'S 2 CD — ' ZcouE Z>w Zu-iu Z "-
CO
CD
cx
o
fS
£
o
u.
^
a.
-------
z
UJ
o
2
C
P
u
01
f—
O
c
c.
t-
2 >
" CS
ED
2
LU
2
LLJ
O
o
o
2
u
LU
D
'C
O
S <
.. CL
< O
s£
xs
d
£ £
c
o
*H
"
CO
2
2
_o
<••>
in
*••»
B
•H
m
S •
§<
1§
•r^
LU 4^
-1 to
t 3
to
^ ^
5 U3
3 .
2 e:
25
us C
|s
<
CO
Z
LU
(A
3
a.
Q
U
u
LU
K
_J
g
r>
0
CD
CA
^|
u.
J
LU
^^
LU
j
LU
LU
_J
LU
^
LU
_J
_J
LU
LU
_l
H
LU
LU
-1
LU
LU
e>
Cl — '
>- e
LL &.
UJ
CO <
i i
> Cfl
U. LU
LU
f~
MEASUI
UJ
r-
r*
p"
p*
z
LU
^
£
(A
^J
C.
o
O
U
<
B
»y ^» CO CO sD
m CM CM
•s- «;r co co en
in CM CM
•ff •? CO CO CM
in CM CM
•s- <• co co i
in CM CM
CO <• C vO 1
•B- CM CM
in -ff in co 1
•
P"> •» \O CO I
CO CM CM
r^ en o
-4 -<
,
- P 131
— O 1- 60 «H
1 tiM 1 01 OJ 4J
U C •" W ^
0) -B O JJ Q •-'
CO Q) O OT)-^ C80)
Lrf CO CC C •£
U C 03 X C.O.U Ct 4J
-H C. 0)1- E *J S
S 6) -HO -HOI -01-1
O ti -s ij teg wo)
c a. 3 tc xEc ujj
0 iJ -H bCLdO C Urt
u B as P*HW K tt .
CD C 60 fl)*M"r^ «CW
D *JQ) C> CT30)
QJ *^ t)Lj QJCC OJOi^J
j: -y cc o a1 -^ e
^j y CX »M *^ •£ 0) O
CU £t3 C'C**"'! JJ*C3U
*^ CO B ^ C C3 CU O "H O
O - O •" » E JJ
• o W u -H y 0) AJ y
C6B ^HM 1-I6C ~H "H O BXO)
S- EM EO SC-C8 CJJ-r-i
0) CC O C K O E C. O -H O
•HM CO) C COE -rt^U
a) ytcyo-y aj — i ilU2
O W ^J Q) *"* CO CV CQ
u^ IM £•, IM "7 *H UH CO ^J C ^ CC C
OB oo oai> o>i o oyo
• O • C. >yj-> • tc c jj •<— IOC
O-H oa. O3U OC-HCB OC8CU
2 J-J Z03 Z*Qtg Z ct E -H 2 U £S
JHM.
00
*"^
CD
2
1
o
rw
1
LL
0.
-------
u
z
UJ
O
t-
u
LU
I-
o
c:
a.
2 >
UJ
UJ
UJ
C/5
_!
Q.
2
O
o
u
2
D
Z
O
CO
5
103
O
LL
11
< o
5E
UJ e.
s <
X
C uj
5
—
3
u
s
u
^
• ^»^
m
m
ce:
m
1-1
to
_ ^
UJ ed
O **
O<
U
Q-8
2 g
^ O
~" «H
UJ J-l
-i
Z
O «
DECISION
Planning
^
V)
2
UJ
VI
^
a.
S
u
u
UJ
K
2
0
5
CJ
§
0
>
u»
UJ
UJ
_j
UJ
Uj'
_J
_J
UJ
^
UJ
_l
UJ
>
UJ
u
UJ
"
UJ
UJ
w
S»
" O
> z
u. a.
UJ
H»
CO <;
*"* ^
O A
>s
U. LU
LU
e
D
en
^
2
o5
UJ
u*
•
^
^
Z
UJ
M*
CO
ACCOMPLI
a
r
in ts ts
'
m <• o m 1
fi cs ts
r-x n o-, sr l
-4 ^
1
O U 00 -H
| l_ I 0) 41 JJ
U C u u >,
CU "O O AJ CU *•• i
CD CU O U*B— < fflO)
M t3 03 C »S
—i C. 0) M B^C
E S) -HO -HO) -BU
O h T! iJ «g 01 D
S C. 3d >> E S U u
0 iJ f-i QCUO C14-!
U CO 0)3 U-HU H«.
4) C M Oix-l-rt J=»-i
O AJQ) C3> CT3Q)
CO ^H UW OCC cUQJiJ
.3 JJ CS O 0) —( C
u 0 o.-^ -y jreuci)
at. gtn c*a««i JJ-BU
UH coco-wc taaio -HO
O - O 4J 3 E AJ
• CJCOU-H O 01 AJ U
fflCO -HM 1160 -^—*O 01XCU
S- SW Ecu ES.C8 S u •<-)
td OJ-i Oh OCJ-H OO — I fc.
01 UCSCJO'CJ OJ —
OCO CO C OJ > 0 >. O QUO
C l-l *J-H i— 1 4) — < "H
• O •& »CJ4J »COC*J «iHttO
O-H 0 O. O3O OC-^ra OBO)
ZU ZQ Z^O) ZQS^ ZUS
CD
00
^-^
<"•*
e
1
^
0.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ MEDIA:
Financial Management (R536) REG. x APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The objective of this decision unit is to assure coordinated and
consistent management and operation of a complete financial management
program. Program goals include increased Regional involvement in the
Agency's budget preparation and execution process, increased analytical
capability for ZBB and all other financial management areas, and
increased involvement in the application of cash management policies
and practices.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Accomplishments include management of the Agency accounting program;
financial systems development, analysis and management; all budget
operations and budget analysis; fund control; cash management and
financial management advisory services to management, program officials
and grantees. In addition, there are all of the accounting and fiscal
services inherent in the financial support operations such as document
handling, review and processing; commitment, obligation and payment
transaction recording; accounting documentation, coding and error
correction; and other fiscal services.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
FT-1978 accomplishments described above will also be achieved during
FY-79. In addition, several cost benefit and productivity analyses
will be conducted and ZBB analytical capability will improve as a
result of experience gained in FY-78.
104
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM 2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE *G MEDIAj PG M &S
R536 FINANCIAL MGMT-REGIONS APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
• • M4i g^ WM 40 ^ ^p _ W4KiV €•<• • •<••• * •<• • •* •»!• • <•• • •••• 4W • • V •><••<• •• W • ••^••W • • H 9 • ••HJ^ ••••••» »
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY PY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. ?Y BO INCR FY SO CUM
POSITIONS PFT . 87.0 86.0 . 69.0 69.0
LEVEL OpFT 8.0 9.0 6.0 6.0
01 OF 06 FTE 99.3 86.1 86.1
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 1,320.0 1,753.7 1,«37.A
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activicles
Base level resources allow only Che performance of legally mandated
financial management and accounting functions, seriously constraining
the quality of Regional efforts.
Perform mandatory payroll and timekeeping functions with some resolution
of payroll problems. Delayed processing of obligation transactions,
backlogs incurred in payment processing and scheduling (exception
Region I, current payments will be made). Minimal collection activity,
limited follow-uu of uncollected accounts receivable. Preparation of
required accounting reports only, infrequent accounting reconciliations.
Limited correspondence with grantees and commercial vendors on payment
problems (Region III will perform cash management for significant grant
programs). Insufficient training of Regional Personnel. Financial
systems maintained with limited documentation; no effort in new systems
development and integration. Budget formulation and justification will
lack sufficient analysis; ZBB process will be utilized ineffectively.
Budget executed and controlled at summary levels; indepth review/analyses
of-resource utilization curtailed. . "
Benefits
Funding this level allows basic maintenance of the Agency accounting
system and performance and execution of mandatory accounting and
budgetary operations with unacceptably lengthy delays in most activities.
Consequences of Not Funding
If this level is not funded, Regional payroll operations-cannot be
performed, the Agency's accounting system cannot be maintained,
processing delays and backlogs would prevent compliance with regulatory
reporting requirements. The Regional budget would not be properly
or adequately formulated, executed or controlled.
105
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PG M &S
R53b FINANCIAL MGMT-REGIONS APPRDt AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY 60 INCR FY 60 CUM
POSITIONS PFT -87.0 66.0 6.0 77.0
LEVEL OPFT 6.0 9.0 6.0
02 OF 06 FTE 99.3 «,0 90.1
BUDGET AUTH. (000,03 1,320.0 1,752.7 193.2 1,630.6
u. uesuisitst I Ht INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
At t'nis level, increased analytical involvement of financial management
personnel with the ZBB process will enhance the effectiveness of ZBB.
Increase reviews of the status of Regional funds; provide fund control
reports to divisions; reduce the backlog in basic budget activities and
in obligation and payment processing and scheduling. Increase effort
to resolve payment problems with commercial vendors and grantees. In
Regions I, III, IV, and V: increase cash management activities (for
grant programs and by providing financial management assistance to -
management and program officials); perform cost/benefit productivity
analyses; develop and implement new financial management systems.
Benefits ,
Funding this level improves the quality of budget formulation, justi-
fication and execution. Delays and backlogs in document handling are
reduced. Improvement in financial information (quantity and quality)
provided to Regional personnel.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding level 2 restricts the possibility of improved accounting
services and budgetary activities. Document handling delays will
result in loss of payment discounts to the Agency and will generate
numerous complaints from commercial vendors and grantees. Analytical
aspects of budget development would be unacceptable.
106
EPA Form 2410-11 (6-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PG M iS
R536 FINANCIAL MGMT-REGIONS APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 87.0 86.0 9.0 86,0
LEVEL OPFT ' 8.0 9.0 fl.O 10,0
03 OP 06 FTE 99.3 10.2 100,3
BUDGET AUTH, (000,0) 1/320.0 1,752.7 209.3 1*839.9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level represents resources necessary to increase efforts in
financial systems documentation and maintenance and in new systems
development. More timely processing of payment documents and
accounting transactions. Increased efforts directed at resolution
of pay and leave problems and management of travel and salary
advances . Reduce delays in collection processing and increase
follow-rup of uncollec-ted accounts receivable;- more frequent accounting
reconciliations. Increase quality control of budget submissions and
justifications from organizational components. Increase involvement
in ZBB development. Minimal long range budget planning. Expand
financial management training of Regional personnel. General improve-
ment of financial management service to programs and management ("e.g.,
additional fund control reports for divisions to improve monitoring
of program progress) . Minimal evaluation of cost-effectiveness of
resource utilization in Regions (significant analytical capability
provided in Region IX only) .
Benefits •
Funding level 3 provides for general improvement in accounting
operations and maintenance of the Agency's accounting system at an
acceptable level.
This level also allows adequate quality control to be incorporated
in budget formulation and execution and improved financial management
communication with Regional organization components.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level results in maintenance of the Agency's accounting
system at only a minimal level; limited cash management activities,
limited new system development. The quality control in budget formu-
lation would be reduced as would the effectiveness of ZBB.
107
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
-
UJ
5j
>.
2 Z
r- r
UJ CO
C UJ
B — '
_J -
f. IK
^ uJ
2 C
i^>'
Z •-
2 —
C 2
C —
> z
2 C
U.' "•
V.
CO ••
u- <_>
•— UJ
« £•
n —
c
uj r
»- cr
2 Z
^
CO
2
C
u.'
e
I
r
CI
£
«
•••
l^>
CO 2
~ ^
C 2
•— »_
t£ u.
U.'
cr «
fr,
•- in
e cc
-
cc
p
cc
c- -»•>
— CO
r
to
u
ru c
C 2
o- —
— 2
2
C.
cc
o
•«
u.
0 •-
cc «:
c- _)
5
(j
2
u.1
e r
CO UJ
e cr
— u
2
CO
p. UJ
f*
r- cc
— c
u
_J
»•• s
-u
l~ 0
p^ fh.
c • ru
o **
^ P."
K) P*
a ru
a fi
• •
f- C-
Ki r-
a ru
^ ^ .
a 'n
• •
£ £
a ru
••
a a -•» & o •-
>- f» c- o- * *
Kl f*» ^ « CC
e a ru
» » *
_ _ —
a a •*,<><»-
f- »». O- «>• «O CC
a a ru
» » »
— •• ••
*~ *- t> e e -n
ru ru c- * t- p-
in in in to c>
>^ >•» if*
* * —
e e co o e>
e e a r- er
ru ru *- CB
-~ -
c
c
9 •-
•• »- U. UJ
c < e t. c u.
• uj cr o ^* *-*
U. X « i 0
S O « ^ C5
— < r o: 2
e «- to c
^- 2 *< ^ **
•J UJ •* UJ * *~
UJ O ^^ ^^ .J ••
> c •- in
UJ 3 S O
_) er c o.
c — p- >-
*** in **i f%
•c a cc *
-
f^i in po • *i
i a cc <
— — » «T
« ru o- in
• • • •
f> in f> p*)
* a cc c« M e c — c- c- mocr*>
« e e »n«»> K\ o e ru
p- c? »~ o c c —
— — — ru ru —
r-*> c- o c. i»i (>.r-. o-eom
rvru o^e'cr- rwru fr^c*t>
inin incc fj* inin inv c>
»• »» in »•- »- in
— ^ * * * "
oe ccoc oo coeo
c- o ar-co oo a *- tt
rwru r- cc ru iv »• cc
— - — — - -
e o
C 0
0 »• C •-
•* **U-hJ c«> ^M-UJ
e «c o c_ c u- c «r o c. O u.
• uj c c »^*^ «uJ cr o >-•«
u.rcoso k. X cr, =• ©
o — -> T •» •• s<-sr*>"-
r'oc^'CO so<^^crv
ru«icr 2 •^«xcr 2
e >-c>-»B
_>UJ~IL'«>- _J UJ — U.' « •-
>0 --B5 >O --05
UJ ^ 3C UJ ^ SO
_>£C CO. _l C C C.
D-
O
01.3
-------
£
< O
5^
c
C uj
r «i
2
UJ
?m
W
< '
2
O
u "—
II
> ^
Z «s
UJ —
w
_J
c.
s
O
U
U
<
2
O
£
O
UJ
J9
oi<
s°
2 ^
O m
U sz
a ^
Z H
< 2
DECISION
FINANCIA
UJ
UJ
1
siw,
e •
F*k
» -i
> i
5 <
S 2
& MEASU
ACCOMI'
2
o
ff*
S O
-T o"
r«»
in
>>o ^
ui
«
3
< — u
c H
S. 1-
...
-
S Z U
§"
u »
"Si
a-
2<
;
_
s 255
-«fcs
^1 ^1
• *M
s v-i su
20 ZS
-=
=
•> *>s »C
oy so cw
2= 2a-2£.
oo
ZSS
C *O
u c2
i-Si.
»
1^
It
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Planning and Evaluation R-539
HQ X
REG.
MEDIA: M5MI.
APPRO: A&RM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
o Provide independent policy analysis support to the Administrator, Deputy
Administrator, Assistant Administrator for Planning and Management and
other top level EPA officials
o Manage the EPA regulations development and reviev process, assess the
economic impact of proposed Agency actions; represent the EPA on energy
policy issues affecting the environment
o Undertake program evaluation, strategic planning and other analyses de-
signed to improve Agency decision making; coordinate issuance of Agency
policy and budget guidance.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
o Streamlined the regulations development process; adding greater public
participation and retrospective review component
o Provided quality analytic support to regulating legislative and other
policy issues
o Tracked and analyzed 40 regulatory reform initiatives, including economic
incentives and process reforms
o Conducted cross-cutting issue analyses in the economic, energy and statis-
tical areas
o Developed EPA Policy Guidance, evaluated selected EPA programs
o Provided the Administrator and Deputy Administrator with extensive policy
support
DI FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
o Absorb a doubling of regulation review and initiate retrospective review
of major regulations
o Develop a coordinated EPA Energy policy
o Begin a strategic planning process for EPA emphasizing a long range
planning perspective
o Institute a systematic evaluation of all EPA programs
o Assist regions to increase their analytic capabilities
o Design a management strategy for specially impacted industries such as
steel or copper
110
EPA. fern 2410-10 (&.7B)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
3RM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HG MEDIAj PG M &S
R53
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Planning and Evaluation R-539
HQ S
REG.
MEDIA: MGMT.
APPRO: A&EM
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL FY 79 C. EST. FY 80 INCR.
FY80CUM.
LEVEL
1 or 6-
POSITIONS PFT1 i 1
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. 1000.0)
1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Administrator/Deputy Administrator Support - Minimal level (about four work-
years) of support for cross-cutting issue paper, special studies, speeches,
talking points, leadership of or involvement in inter and intra-Agency task
forces (e.g., URPG, RCC, Coal Policy Review).
NOTE: Based on experience, rough 20 percent of the above activities will
change in response to changing Administration or ETA management priorities.
IMPACTS - Minimal support for standards development (with about twice as
many standards as now); guidance, other statutory and inter-agency agreement
responsibilities fulfilled with low quality performance; no EPA-wide strate-
gy planning or program strategy support; very limited regional support;
spotty review of regulations and guidance; no review of regulations for
compliance with President's Executive Order; few initiatives on regulatory
reform, improving management of programs, etc.; no ability to defend Agency
against economic attack.
112
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HS MEDIAj PG M &S
R53
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DE;ISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAJ PG M &s
R539 =>LANNING AND EVALUATION APPRDi AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT . 75.0 61.0 9.0 60.0
LEVE. OPFT 6.0 2fl.O a.O 25.0
03 OF 06 FTE 115.2 10.2 116.1
BUDGET AUTH, COOO.O) 6,360.0 7,565.3 706.6 6,897,7
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVfTIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
Regulation Development Process - Prepare four Regulation Issues Calendars
for top management with good quality control; "plain English' editing; train-
ing program on "How to write a regulation."
NOTE: Since the number of regulations is doubling, this level of support
covers only half the percentage of regulations it would have previously.
Analytical Support of Reg, and Legislation Development - Technical support
for 15 new regs. (total of 120 of 200); review all major and selected signi-
ficant regulations to ensure Executive Order compliance; statistical support
for three more (total of 16); modest analytic support for seven retrospective
reviews under Executive Order; statistical support for programs/regions de-
signing statistical content of contract studies of 12 regs./enforcement ac-
tions; economic/energy analysis for two more regs. (total of 9); and seven
more regional actions (total of 10).
Regulatory Reform - Carry three level one initiatives through implementation;
develop an additional economic incentive (e.g., copper smelter air compli-
ance); CAA Section 405 Report to Congress on economic approaches; and develop-
ment of legislative initiatives for permit reform programs.
Cross-cutting Economic/Energy/Statistical Issues - Intensive analytic work
on several DOE/DOI initiatives with serious environmental effects (e.g.,
National Energy Plan Initiatives, coal policy issues); complete design of and
help implement EPA management strategy for one specially impacted industry
(such as steal or copper); significant effort to defend Agency against attack
(e.g., inflation responses to Strauss).
Strategy/Guidance/Evaluation - Design minimal EPA program evaluation strategy
with EPA programs and regions; support pilot tests by one program office and
one region; provide support to Regions in increasing program evaluation capa-
bility.
Administrator/Deputy Administrator Support - Slightly more effort (1 more
workyear—total of six) on special studies, talking points, etc.
NOTE: Based on experience, roughly 25% of the above activities will change
in response to changing Administration or EPA management priorities.
IMPACTS - Acceptable performance on mandated responsibilities; stronger regu-
latory reform efforts; first step towards a reasonable agency evaluation
strategy including assistance to Regions in developing program evaluation
capacity; no support of Agencyvide Strategic planning; defend environmental
interest on selected energy initiatives; significant efforts to defend Agency
interest against economic attack; Assist Regions to implement energy/growth
policy regulations.
EPA Fern 2410-11 (6-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
_ • • M • • • M MflB V M W • ••• • • • • •flWM W M • W IV • • • V • •• • • • • • •••• ^>B>^*>^( 9 • V • flfr^p W tp • ••••^PW • •
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE • HQ M£DIA» PG M &S
R539 PLANNING AND EVALUATION APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
04 OP 06 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY
. 75.0
8.0
6,380.0
79 C. E.
81.0
aa.o
115.2
7,565.3
FY BO INCR
8.0
7.5
667.6
FY 80 CUM
88..0
25,0
121*6
7,565.3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Regulation Development Process - Additional Federal Register review and
assistance (25 per month - total of 60); involve 10-20 selected State/local
officials. Bi-weekly top management issue reports, more State/local involve-
ment, more F.-R. assistance, offer training for work groups in regulation
writing. Pull compliance with the Executive Order on regulations.
NOTE: Since the number of regulations is doubling, this level of support
covers only half the percentage of regulations it would have previously.
Analytical Support of Reg, and Legislation Development - Analytic support on
50 major regulations focused on cross-cutting, intermedia issues; review
statistical analytic quality of 3-5 regs. of interagency interest; energy/
economic analysis done for two additional regs. (total of 11) and tnree more
regional actions (total of 13) ; economic/energy/statistical staffs will pro-
vide extensive consulting services for program office and regional staff
working in these areas, including training work group members on use of sta-
tistics in reg. development. Increase support for retrospective review of
existing regulations. Expand support for retrospective review and assess-
ment of compliance of significant regs. with the Executive Order.
Regulatory Reform - Develop and manage coherent overall strategy for regu-
latory reform and work closely with Administration off icals to publicize it;
one additional reform efforted staffed in OPE: develop one more incentive
approach (e.g., incentives for mobile source in-use strategy) and plan imple-
mentation of another developed by ORD/OAQPS (e.g., benzene),
Cross-cutting Economic/Snergy/Statistical Issues - Aggressive review of all
major DOE/DOI energy policy initiatives from environmental standpoint in
support of Energy Policy Committee; begin development of a coordinated Agency
energy policy; complete study of marginal cost of control for specific pollu-
tants regulated by standards existing now and under development, to support
top managenent decision-making;- recommendations on improving Agency decisions,
issues (e.g., initiate speeches) handle relationships with top Administration
economic spokesmen (CEA, CWPS, etc.). Develop program to minimize plant
closings through use of existing economic assistance programs; start intensive
development of a coherent EPA energy policy. A more agressive Agency economic
program would be developed.
115
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Planning and Evaluation R-539
HQ
REG.
MEDIA: MGMT.
APPRO: A&RM
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY78 ACTUAL FY 79 C. EST. FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
4 OF 6
POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Strategy/Guidance/Evaluation - High quality guidance development with strong
region/State involvement and policy analysis for top management; an EPA-wide
strategic planning process will be instituted emphasizing a long-range plan-
ning perspective, cross-program issue resolution, State/KA planning, and a
coherent EPA approach to environmental management; increased Management Task
Force staff consulting emphasizing State delegation issues; extensive pro-
gram evaluation of four major EPA programs (rather than a limited evaluation
.at lower levels).
Administrator/Deputy Administrator Support - One more workyear (total of 7)
on special studies, talking points, issue papers, etc.
NOTE: Based on experience, roughly 30% of the above activities will change
due to changing Administration or EPA management priorities. »
IMPACTS - S«trong performance on mandated responsibilities; sufficient re-
sources to allow emphasis on extensive consultation and assistance rather
than simply internal review and critiques; strong regulatory reform program;
start of a strong Agencywide strategic planning process; strong involvement
in Administrative energy issues; aggressive program to defend Agency against
economic attack; and active participation in growth policy development.
Strong top management control of regulatory development; new program to avoid
plant closings; stronger program evaluation capability in support of-Execu-
tive Order on retrospective reviews.
116
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM a: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
** »•«»••••»••»• ••••••••••••••^••••••••••••••••••••^••••••••••••MWW
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA. PG M &S
R539 PLANNING AND EVALUATION APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
* * " ™ •* •'••»»••'•• W • • Ml •>•••• • • ^••••••PWWV • • ••§•>••••§••• • V • H (p • 19 •• M V V ^ V W ^ 9 • VI • V* ^ • • 9
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 75.0 81.0 88,0
LEVEL OPFT 8.0 24.0 2,0 27.0
05 OF Ob FTE 115.2 2.9 126.5
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 6,380.0 7,565.3 350.0 7,915,3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Analytical Support of Reg, and Legislation Development - Energy/economic
analysis of three more regs. (total of 14) and one more regional enforcement
decision (total of 14).
Cross Cutting Issues - Study impacts on capital markets and productivity.
A more aggressive Agency economic.program would be developed.
IMPACT - Development of coherent Agency long-term energy and economic growth
policy; strongre program evaluation capability in support of Executive Order
on retrospective reviews.
117
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
>-
z
If
«
>-
z cr
o <
••• Z
UJ CO
*-
C uJ
IX U
_l C
< 05
^ UJ
z cr
UJ
I t-
Z *•"•
o z
a n
> z"
z c
UJ »»
CO
CO »i
UJ U
H- UJ
«"c. '
O5 —
Kl
C
U. 3.
f- tr
** O
z u.
n
z
t- a
z -*
x <
UJ —
IS _J
z >
< kl(J
z
^
•c .Z
„ *
z o
z •—
z z
< ^r
_j <
a. _i
CL
< o-
Kl
« in
— a;
o*
CO
cr
ac
cr »»
-« 05
I
«
UJ
ru cs
00 Z
0 -i
— z
z
<
o-
00
cr
»*
UJ
0 f-
a. «
0- _J
— n
X
n
o
UJ
o z
CC *&j
cr or
~* tj
z
*-
cr u
r*
o~ cr
»
_j
|S. X!
O ^
— u
CD ru
• •
•c r«-
ru >•
•• »^
in iv
oa ru
0 r»
ru —
— r~
in ru
co ru
• •
•c r-
ru —
••* f^-
» ^
in ru
as ru
* r-
IV •*
^* r^
« «
in ru
oc c- ac ru o c ru
•c OD ao r* cr r— sr
ru d r* »-• in •• Cr
VM o c r^
in ru K» ru
ru
KI OD in
h" ru cr sr
o o o sr o c.
o in in « in cc
cr er cr cr f^
^ *7 *^ ***
« ru KI KI
o
o
O 1-
f- t- u. iu
o < c a. c u.
• uj tr o ^- •—
U. X CO — • 0
o — n r <* ~
n o « v- 05
— - >^
_J UJ — i UJ « >-
> 0 •- 05
aJ 2 no
-IX CO.
«— ru r* oo
• • • •
cr o r- in
o» ac< t> in
— ru CD «
•C Kl ^ Kt
— • ru r» oc
o- & r- in
oc ac cr IT
— ru oc «
* Kl * K,
»~ rw r- it
• • • •
o o t*. m
c K o- in
— rj o >c
•» «•> «•> «fc
* KI ^> *n
«p- rv r^ a>
o* o r- in
i*O f>
"
— O *- *X C C O- F^Of^ttOO —
c> o c- c- ^ — ir> f*-fuiftiPoir*
co 3 w CD *-~ nj o c^ »" -o »n ^fV^Kl *
f^Offlcoor^. -d o *e >c o e *OlP f^fVSJ*'*
Ok
V-*
Ktcm^coorvi f^ oc tr> o o o ru
in p^ — o- — ^ in 4Tii^— '.> — oLn
^ O >C O «oc — tno-oo — •
f*-njsrs? r-^ru^Q
ooo^c-c ooo^oo
o ir> in — ir> c o IT* IT* « ir> cc.*-
K>f^C-f^ KIKIO1^
*tOruf\Ki ^> ru t*» r^
0 0
o o
O fr- O •—
*fr ^-.jiVU,1 If- ^~U.UJ
o -»-4 »-;zx>-*-*
-J UJ •- Uj < H- _JUJ — UJ<>-
uid^'^'_j«-« ujts^'^'j*^
>c »-« >o *-w
UJd ^O UJ ^ ^O
^CD o a. _i ;r o a.
Kt « Kl
*r\ —
•**• ^ f- ST
K.
IP e> ir» ir\
«c c ^ t>
tn o c- .—
»*• W .X. ^f
Kl * pr, —
mo 4f> ir
* o — o-
Ifl O O1 —
,k ^ ^ ^
^ cr i^ a-
W -4 K> »-
if\ c- in IT
<4> O «•• O1
1/tO f> —
fc fc fc ^
r** w ^ w
-
KieciT'^c-o^o Kiccm^-c
in KI — o «c m KI ..oKi^sntc
*C O ^ O CO fy fXl w O **• &• CC
ino-^o »— O" Cf- o —
r*-r\j»^ i^rviinv
^£> cc cc at ^ u% o o tr
r*- — • s/> KI cc f*- c cm
^> f* o in in m cc
••D •** «• •*» Kl K> —
,
Kt«cinooofv K»coino c c- ru — ^DOtOocc
in cr x c — inin-^-tf%ct> oinm— «in
ccxo-ecr* eoffOccp-
K»K>^K» KlfOOKt
•* ry »*> KI ^i ru to KI
0 c-
c c
0 *. o
«* >* U- UJ •* *-
o x«r>o
c*-ns.*»%*» o«-O£«*»
^o<*-w ^o*^-cc
^r-cr>c
t-2X>-.-« *— 2 X >- t-»
_J UJ «— UJ < *— _J UJ *- UJ < *-
>c »-« >o «-w
U,'2 — O UJ ^ ^ C
_J x o a. _i a: o CL
CC
t
•*
o
o
ni
-------
z
Ul
CS
z a
o «
••» X
u 5
LLJ CO
*-
C kU
a: u
c. a.
_i o
< cc
t- yj
z a
lu
z •-
z •-
o z
EC =i
*4
> z
z o
UJ u
I— UJ
« a
i— a:
-i O
z
•- c
z »•
li, t-
c
•e z
<
cs
z u
<-> z
0113'
a
o-
•C IT
— o:
o- ~
— o?
>
»-f
o t-
^^
i
I
o-
o
O IT
• •
r~ «
ru
-------
CJ
UJ
C5
Z
C
H
C
UJ
H
C
C
c.
2 >
I!
li
> ^
UJ
o
H
Z
o
z
o
UJ
O
LL
1 i
§ <
.. — '
< o
c E
UJ ft.
s <
X
cs
C uj
in
i
^
e
•H
4J
5
f— 1
o
^
K
"C
c
tc
00
c
c
c
C3
a,
UJ
O
0
L3
a
z
Ul
•J
J;
t-
i
3
2
0
C1?
5
UJ
O
<
t/5
^
Z
LU
—
Zj
i
o
u
o
t
_l
^
D
1
u.
e>
a>
i—
^
u.
aa
c-.
*~
?"
"•
y
c
(4
<
U
V
tt
«
U
H
^1
i
3
OOO O OO O COOOOOO
©*rm o oo f) trjm\ci©»ff©in
O fi*) (^ CO f^ CS «7 f^ «f ^4 f^ N
ON * . ^
OOO O OO C OOOOOOO
O«ffm in O© m mOr»©f)CD»H
^ i— 1 (MCO «ff (M fn SO «ff i— I r*H CM
ooo o oo o oooooo©
O *^ "^ O O O ^"> O O ON O O «^ ON
>? i-l
OOO O OO O -OOOCOOO
OCMO o inm 05 o'df-
Jn ^ in ^ 1-1
C 1
_ 1 O D. >» 1
05 es ^^. « o:
05 T3 — H O ^™1' JJ CD tt O i"H P O C *"
US' 3MCOCSO U R. O OO B
«•* OBBiU rtjj^ 05T5CS CT^Q> 03^ 01
O U 01 OO 3C£ CCi-( coca 0) — 1 K a •• -H
>|_S! ^ "^r* SPS— DOS E sen ojc-Hos'-o
BM »C 3 ^» *UEO -H 00 OD C) XOUOC/33
y t&C <-^ QJ CS i. 0) AJ 05 Cl C U Sw'C^-HOJ-HOO'U
C03 C8 CB! kHf-l t-(B3 JJlu •^SCCD^SW
21 "22 °, " 06JC 3X15 ti OcScS^^iJJPs
EU CE -H M > O QDi-l C 3 X B.JZ ^H <-| ct CO iw U
D.JJ wed JJ jjoi^ cjtBts y*J 3u>ysc o^
O-H i-*!- yjj tiojj we i-^ oaiaii^ojouj ^i
^"i CD OO CO ^ O CC CD • CO F*H p iJ Lrf E C "^ O J*J O
w- uoeoi-M OiCi-* P 03 031-1 oo oooc wa.
>60 PCO)003Cl,O3AJflJi-ioD 0^03 •HtfieuOJWO
w 0) iJ C O> *^ ^ ^ ^^ 3 "^ nf> ^ *jj C3 0) W CO C ^^ CC c O PC fi* ^H
Oficcoo ^J—^ccccj-iicucu^tju y&»opyoyu«( cuc^co
E'^OO'HiJ'Hal BPECi-f 03 B'HO'rt'Ha)OOE3P
Ei-HPiJCPcB Ei-tiH c. jjn-ica.yjJ3iJ*j ^E,cooj
oceoeo-HSEoccoffiAJoStoooo co tocoSPw-iO c
^^'"^''^CPJJJJ CJfH03i-HQJ"H "i^iH^Hi— HC-H^HOJCJiHt— (CCU
C5"S UBOC5 OUJ/-vb> JJOJ03 > •> ^ ti tj > 5 SslfiCB Sl"*"e £) S^ *^
rHCJOCup— HVMOO x*J5tDflJflj4JOccoj— iafpijajcuMcLcu ^^.
00 CO 13 i-l fN
CJ» •• • CC* •• • * •• «
K< eeo o
-------
o
UJ
O
U
UJ
H-
o
c:
a.
-j
2 >
£ c
il
> w
2 J2
"S
UJ
O
O
K
2
2
O
U
UJ
^r
S
O
u.
z <
.. a.'
< O
UI e_
5 <
X
O
C ui
Ov
ft
m
a:
c
o
u
en
3
CO
"0
a
00
c
"a
CO
w-i
0*
UI
Q
8
O
Z
UI
^»
j-
z
o
z
o
£2
u
UI
O
<
W
t—
Z
UI
5
M
^
5
O
U
UI
K
^
U
D
3
CJ
O
CD
O
^
U.
_J
UI
UI
1
«•!
Ul
UI
J
I
1
Ul
Ul
-J
H
-J
Ul
^>
Ul
•J
1
«J
Ul
^
Ul
—I
j
Ul
Ul
en
d _,•
>• c
U. 0.
H
r- S
y> £
*" ^
^ >. eo e 2 ao m
^ c. i-i o MCX oi i-«,_i « 01 e
-J073 0)0 O-HU U SO) 01 >iJO
ue UU-IFH &o oc«o SJCB-H
Ob XBu EMUO O 001 3 olcna
Q.OJJ 4JC-H 1- 0^4 CO sr USUj 60 S-^3
O*JG -^os oauns u cSSo e-»4x
O* *"^ S CQ JJ «2 X QJ^J^dGJOlOlO DO HH C CO CD *O ^J ^ 3
3C 3CBUOOSCB U>-r^^ B 00)CJ3-HOi4)iJ
O) 00 "H O" f^OSS JJX •HO*J03«H^H^HCD^-i 3 03V4U
^OlCfl 3W C05MCiJWO05 AJffl«Jt04J£r5C«5 OO
^OijJS UieogT) O OO«O.«)4> 4jytd^ao3«->CoS£S--i
CQ > C ^ Q CO 03 i"H M ^H taJ ^ fl l03CH4JCflOflJ^ O
O "^ O 01 CO <"^. /-v 'Ht03OSai
-------
o
UJ
Z
o
K
o
UJ
H
o
C
C.
2 >
UJ ~-
UJ
CO
K
LU
X
z
o
UJ
'a:
O
u.
ll
.. e.'
< O
si
s <
X
CS
C UJ
in
I
q
jj
e
•^
B
•O
G
bC
C
"2
E
a
r—
C-
UJ
O
o
u
o
z
<
Ul
t
*-
t
Z
D
Z
O
to
5
UJ
O
<
t-
Z
Ul
i
t/9
J
C.
«£
O
U
u
_!
s
D
o
CO
>
u.
Oi
R
*™
^
u.
es
tr
^
u.
u
c
(
<
u
«
a
u
H
?
H
2
u
S
•
t
••
B
«
!.
C.
<
0
Ul
Ul
1
I
•••J
Ul
Ul
J
.
T
Ul
^
Ul
J1
Ul
Ul
^
-J
Ul
Ul
j
UJ
Ul
•
o
r
c.
Ul
t—
i
^_
C/5
UJ
J
^
5
9
£
5
j
j
j
?
j
5
j
;
:
3
coo o oooo
P^ fi fH ^ CS O O 0&
• ts O sr r-i
1—1
©O© © OOOO
••• • ••••
^ ^\ *ff r^
coo© ooo©
r^ »— 10 tn ooovo
•-i f~ sr IH
C OO O- OO OO
— ( VD m .-i
ooco ©coo
<-: m CM
*
OOOO O©OO
©oom oooo
<•"! C *T ^
X C AJ *S
•0 0 X t-l 1 n
3 TJ 60 - -HB
AJ JWCJ *O Cw CO
O CS jj < o
•H > iJ CO AJ BE
to iHcycjAJcog««
s E-HTJE s CUE to
^H tQC«i*HCU CX ECJCS
a w 5 oo ai 3 E o S
> BO*O 1 CD CO Q AJ U -H AJ
w c c- o u u o o o re ai w
AJ C, 6JE-H 00. -HEX3U
ceoj>, > AJQ,occoueaic3
E C 0 O O *C O W CC *^ U *w £ ^ Q}
» — ^ 7^ ^ n hf> «H S »ii m
gTHOJAJCUWC CAJtJ /^ x- v £ ^v. /^
M>«Ci coaekjiH -H essat-tcsH'-Hesi
6 a uh |§< « 122
^?
v-'
f^.
flO
fN
0
§
0
u.
o.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ 0P.M MEDIA:
Audit R5*5 REG. • APPRO: SU?POrt
8) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Conducts the Agency's overall Audit program, which includes independent
appraisals of the economy and efficiency of the Agency's program and
financial operations. Reviews grant and contract proposals to determine
adequacy and accuracy of pas* data and the financial capabilities of
grantees and contractors.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Effort in FY '78 was spread across, ail the major types of audits, primarily
in response to management requests. A significant effort was involved in
training new contractors to perfera final construction grant audits.
Financial Audits
Construction Grant »
Hreaward 312
Interim 76
Final 666
Other Grants & Contracts 260
Internal & Met. Audits - - - - 9
1323
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
In FY '79, more in-house effort will be taken from preaward audits and
assigned to interim audits of construction grants. These are time-
consuming audits, but are extremely useful in investigating fraud or
correcting problems in the grants before the problems reach major
proportions. The final audits of construction grants will be increased
through the use of C?A contracts.
Financial Audits
Construction Grant
Preaward 191
Interia 1U-9
Final ' 822
Other Grants & Contracts 8l
Internal & Met. Audits 0
12^3
123
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAJ PG M iS
R545 AUDIT APPRO! AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C, E. FY BO INCR FY 60 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 109.0 110.0 82.0 82,0
LEVEL OPFT 27.0 13.0 ii.O 11,0
01 OF 06 FTE 128.5 111.7 1H.7
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 8,020,0 6,596,6 fa
DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Allegations of fraud or. construction grant projects result in interim audit!
which are both unscheduled and unpredictable in terms of resources required
This resource level aliovs audit coverage of fraud allegations, and the
operation of the contract audit services program. Fraud audits are our
highest priority. The contract CPA's conduct some interim construction
grant audits, but primarily conduct final audits of the grants. The use
of a portion of our resources to monitor the audit contracts is desirable
at this level since it multiplies our audit capability. kO CFR 30.820(b)
requires a final audit of "-' "* grants and this level aliovs a partial
recognition of this requirement.
Failure to approve this level vould violate 31 USC 66 which requires Agency
heads to establish and maintain a system of internal audit. It would also
deny the Administrator any independent assessment of the fiscal integrity
of EPA's programs.
At this level, the audit program would include only interim and final
audits of construction grants.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'OR* 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAf PG M &S
R545 AUDIT APPROJ AGENCY I REG M.GT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80~CUM
. POSITIONS PFT 109.0 110.0 ie.0 100,0
LEVEL OPFT 27.0 13.0 1.0 12.0
02 OF 06 FTE 128.5 10.« 122.1
BUDGET AUTM. (000.0) 8,020,0 8,596.8 1,289.. 8 7,738.9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
At this level, we would be able to accept management requests -o audit
significant problems in Agency contracts and in grants other than those
involved in the construction of wastewater treatment plants. These are
situations involving major mismanagement of Federal funds but not
involving the suspicion of fraud. These are not conducted by contract
auditors because of the sensitivity of the issues -involved.
Failure to approve this level would make it difficult or impossible for
the Agency to identify and recover improperly spent funds.
125
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'OPM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA: PG M &S
R$«5 AUDIT APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
***^**<*""m —******B**
-------
1
u
z
UJ
tS
^
z a
o <
— r
u 5
uj to
O uj
ST U
&. or
_i O
•" U
Z E
UJ
Z »-
z *•
Q Z
C =9
>• Z
Z O
UJ —
09
n M«
u u
>— yj
•* O
•9 ••
C
u X.
" £
z il
~
z
z
u
r
•e
£•
Z
HM
2
Z >-
_J O
c. =
Oil"?*?
« in
— c
c
CB
c-
9" •**
— n
*•?
T
09
iU
ru. cs
o- •*
— z
z
a.
C
o-
•
UJ
2*
•*>
e *-
c <
— ^
r
^
u
»•
UJ
o s
C WJ
o- a
«i» ^3
Z
»»
o- !2
PO
* E
u
J
r*. 5
o- >-
— e
o> tn
Q- o
a o
* ^
— e
9 e
o er
* *
"I *
t> IT
V O
o c
Ife ^
<£ P^
-• O
o- in
w o
3T C
« IB
X r*
— — C O C 0 f-
C5* tt> •• iA Aj ^ •*
a- o sr o «c — —
e o 9 « —
*o 9 mr\
— — o o c o »^
C1 co "• in AJ •• ••
«• o si e c — —
9 0 ? A —
* » » «.
•c v nj ^>
c ^ *v»*> e o in
« i»\ m •*•> c *^«
p. e c* t*. — ^ rv
m o in o *• *™
• in «tn
e e e ec e e
e •£ « — o- t~
ru M p> »o o ru
o o p> r- »
es «r «^ sr
e
c
a —
M >- U. U
o < e CL o u.
• UJ g O ^^ ^*
u. r «n 3 e
= — 3 r •» -
^ O < ** «9
— « I er z
C ^> 09 O
»- Z X >-«
u3 CS — >—_) —
> g »- C9
_*c c ol
fr 0 « l»1
03 *
f*l ^ O- ^"
r- m in o
r» a e in
.» e «o w
•C •* « Kl
K\ * &1 »»-
^ in me
r~ « oo in
•«
• • • •
C * fr r*
t» in in o
% ^ "k »
^- » w in
^c«»ooo^ o^ru^toem
•om^^^eruru ctrtinvtOftaD
K^oK^^o««ru oo^^^^^^^ru
r-inrutn— — in o in o — —
^ 7 J» « «m>»<«n
05^-oooc o- co — weew
c>p~rv«i»««c ^^»ru^^o••4
a> o- c- * — — in»*o —
ni7K-r~ fioru
e&9-r»— oov^»«»
»www «»me
o o
o e
0 — O *-
•4 ^>U.UJ M *nU.UJ
«£*^ J«-sU.O.— -O*^ J^U,a.»-
o < o a O u. o < o o. o u.
• ujfiio ^^* «ujee «^^^
U.Xtf9wC U.TC93O
o — =>s«— o — =>x« —
= e«»~
ruC 9- — — Z X >- —
.JUJv^UJ^^- .JujMUJ^*1*
>C ^-w: >o ^"9
UJ2 ~ C UJ r 2O
_j c oa. _) c o o.
-------
CJ
UJ
o
y
UJ
H
o
c
2 >
I!
il
> w
2 W
UK
LJ
Q.
5
2
o
t/5
O
UJ
•«•
2
'z
i-.
0
£
3
CO
eg
— <
S jj
< o
5£
LU e_
5 <
1
O LU
_;
*
LU
O
0
u
o
z
LU
•J
h™
K
t-
i
z
o
DECIS
<
(A
z
LU
1
M
C.
O
U
ULATIVE
5
o
0
^
^
^
LU
^
LU
_J
_J
>
LU
-1
^1
>
LU
VEL j_l
LU
_l
M
_j
^
LU
_J
H
LU
^
LU
_J
e>
2 -»"
>g
LL C.
Y 1978
STIMATE
U. LU
LU
e
Cfl
LU
LU
fv
"
^
^B
MPLISHMEN
O
0
c
<
e
*
H ON C\J — ! ro
ON-=- CV1 CO 1 jj-
-) -1 CO CV
ON ON -H ON
-s- LA CD I O
-i t- ON
LT> m CO
rn ON 1 CM
-H LT\ t-- »
i-i ON CM t-; m
ON^- CV' CO 1 .5-
— • t-i CD CM
-H
r\j \S \O c ON! rn
^ !- NC ^C CM
m a j P-,
1 1
CO CD
CO CO (0
u
to o! CO
** IH *5
0 4-= C JJ O
& E O E &
o aj o o o
>i >- E K
C eg (D
+> 60 fH
•HE B S IS
•S 0 T3 ^ E i
3 -HUE E S O
a jJ cS -H eS S EH
'-lEcsai'Scjeg 1OO
0«1«CUJJE /fl
asiSc^t,^ i *t W
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HO x MEDIA:
Legal Services R-548 REG. APPRO: Enf.
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
1. Adequately perfora EPA's share of the work in all litigation brought
against the agency.
2. Participate actively in the development of all major regulations.
3. Advise as requested on any permit decision brought to EPA headquarters
for review.
A. Conduct all pesticides cancellation hearings the 8PAB. system produces;
participate actively in all BJARS.
5. Provide adequate legal advice on all grants and contracts.
6. Provide legal advice as required to programs, with emphasis on
developing legal support to new approaches to agency duties and on
regulatory reform.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1. .Adequately perform EPA's share of the work in most major litigation
brought against the .agency.
2. Participate actively in the development of a selected number of major
regulations, and in a selected number of major permit decisions.
3. Complete one pesticides cancellation hearing.
4. Provide a maintenance level of legal advice on grants. ,
5. Provide legal advice to programs on the most significant legal
questions they face.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
1. Adequately perform EPA's share of the work in most major litigation
brought against the agency.
2. Participate actively in the development of a selected number of major
regulations and in a selected number of major permit decisions.
3. Conduct three pesticides cancellation hearings.
4. Provide a maintenance level of legal advice on grants.
5. Provide legal advice to programs on the most significant legal
questions they face. '•!
129
EPA Perm 2410.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DRM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA: PG M &S
R546 LEGAL SERVICES APPRDj AGENCY & REG HGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 99.0 127.o 95.0 95.0
LEVEL OPFT fe.o 6.0 ' a.o «,o
01 OF 08 FTE 133.0 lib.7 116.7
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 3,263.0 4,415.9 3,297.« 3,297.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This budget submission applies the following premises:
1. The work of the General Counsel's office is largely measured by the
regulations EPA issues. Grant appeals, pesticides cancellations and
non-eaforcement, non-defensive litigation make significant additional
contributions. Permit decisions will grow in importance as NPDES permits
need renewal and new permit programs begin under SWDA, SDWA, and CAA.
2. OGC's work consists of litigation, overwhelmingly defensive, regulation
development support, and program advice. For major regulations, adequate
support requires a third of a work year (wy) (including supervisory and
secretarial time). For minor regulations, the level is much lower and
variable. Program advice varies with the number of regulations though
not explicitly tied to it. We estimate 1/3 wy per regulation for this too.
3. The amount of defensive litigation is not discretionary. Once sued
we must do what the courts regard as an adequate job. Otherwise we risk
both our reputation with the courts and disruption to Agency programs from
avoidable defeats. This requires a third of a wy for major regulations.
Established EPA programs heavily engaged in litigation must therefore
receive priority from OGC.
The other categories can be cut down to very low levels if need be. The
resulting regulations will then be less defensible and more costly to
defend.
Level 1 would reduce OGC staff slightly while regulatory activity expands.*
We would reprogram staff out of other offices into Air and Water. Even so
in Air and Water we would just maintain current staff levels while workload
increases. In consequence, our current inadequate participation in regula-
tion writing would decline. In litigation we would have to rely more on
the Department of Justice. However, the Pollution Control Section has only
20 lawyers and is increasingly devoting its attention to enforcement cases.
At this level we could defend 90 lawsuits out of 200 and participate in
development of 50 regulations out of an estimated 120 to be issued.
There are 200 major regulations under development now — many at early
and "inexpensive" stages — as compared to 120 a year ago. OPE
estimates regulatory activity will stay at 200 through FY 1979. SI?
revisions and permit actions are not included. As these regulations -
are issued, litigation will result. -1
EPA Perm 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
?QRM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA: PG M &S
R548 LEGAL SERVICES APPROj AGENCY i REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 99.0 127.0 19.0 1-1«.0
LEVEL OPFT b.O 6.0 1,0 5.0
02 OF 08 FTE 133.0 10,9 127,6
BUDGET AUTH, (000,05 3,283.0 4,«l5.9 659.a 3,956,8
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
This level's thirteen new attorneys (at one secretary to two lawyers) will
go to the Air and Water Divisions to handle litigation largely caused
by the 1977 statutory amendments.
We anticipate about 200 suits against us under the Clean Water Act (CWA)
in fiscal 1980. Over half will be challenges to NPDES decisions
(including variances) arising out of the new 1977 variance provisions and
the '79 wave of permit renewals. These cost .05 to .1 wy. Challenges
to 16 effluent guidelines will cost 5.25 wy. Adding in smaller actions,
we estimate 18 wy of litigation under the CWA in FY '80.
We also anticipate about 8 wy of litigation under the Solid Waste
Disposal Act (SWDA) , half arising from 100 challenges to permit decisions.
We also anticipate about 125 lawsuits under the Clean Air Act. Over half
will be challenges to SI? approvals and promulgations costing 19 wy total.
(The 1977 amendments require several hundred major changes in SIPs to
implement PSD, non-attainment, and other statutory provisions.)
Defense of citizen suits and litigation on national regulatory actions
(final PSD regulations, AAQs changes or promulgations, NSPS, NESHAPS)
will add 3 wy more, as will litigation on smelter orders and federal fund
cut-offs (sec. 176).*
Benefits
EPA could handle an additional major 50 lawsuits with its own resources.
(In total, about 140 of the 200 major lawsuits we-expect).
Consequences of Not Funding
Over half of EPA's maj.or lawsuits would have to be defended by Justice
exclusively, probably inadequately due to resource constraints.
About seventy cases under the Water Act are pending now, and about
100 under the Air Act, a majority of the latter filed within the
last few months and just beginning to demand work.
131
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOR*. £: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO M£DIAj PG * &5
R5U6 LEGAL SERVICES APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
B,
L
o:
RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
.EVEL DPFT
i OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 76 ACT FY
99.0
6.0
3,283.0
79 C. E.
127.0
6.0
133.0
4,
-------
*- r
— r
-J O
« cc
2 —
O 2
> Z
Z -
Ui -*
*• X
— S
Z U.
-
o- -e
o- -e
ni s
c.ccocoe.e
** f\j
in in o r~ o o -o
y» « e CD r>- < IT
C I— IB
ca
o o e m e e
m * PI. m » *
e o — in e-
ocemeo
* — in c-
>v
-------
O
z
U
2
O
UJ
I-
o
c
0.
2
> "
2 c/5
"2
Oi
O
O
O
H
2
2
O
o
UJ
D
CC
O
BO C
S M
< 6
o?
UJ C.
5 <
O LU
™ cz
s *
§5
c B
*
C
"" CC
LL 0
H* *^
^ L
£ a
zr
« *•
C/S
^
UJ
___
t/5
13
c.
O
u
u
UJ
<
_J
D
=>
O
cs
e»
*"*
^
n
UJ
LU
j
LU
LU
-1
U
^
UJ
rj
_J
LU
UJ
H
.J
UJ
UJ
_ J
-1
•J
UJ
^
UJ
Ci
o -,•
O
^ C
u. i.
UJ
tt ^
r«k
2 -
^* £T
LL UJ
UJ
c
t/:
UJ
^
LU
t-
H
^"
z
LU
— •
^T
w
1 ff i
c-* •«
^
UJ
D
<
o
o
u
o
•K X 5 OJ
^ in n o T-I 01 B
*C" f^« •? "H «H 0)
e a; ~
01 W
J^ 0> *M
o -a
•a- o P^ o eo ^ <*<
O >-, 03 S
O"\ ^^ ^f^ ^S QJ *"H
eo u-i ,
n eg
eo jj jv
1- -H E
eo ce
J £ o)
<* m m o "~ p
" ^"03
2 ? —
JJ QJ •>
-H B
JJ 0)
c o r^ m o -3 u
c^ xc m 3 c v-i
•0 CS 3
C 0
O X CD
y i-i a)
>•> o c
-H JJ ^ Lu
o> C E O
JJ 0 X i-<
ec -^ JJ iH o)
5 jj TH a) m
rr « ns T-< w 3
0> _ Q) -H &.
•O B -H -D J5 JJ
eg c V -HOI csoifi
o u > u «o)
B 1-1 c O-H WJJ.H
JJ JJ CO l-i > 3 U
_j eg u C. -3 O C — i •
3 fH C C8 -H LU 0)
a 3OB ce euvuw
5 60 Ol JJi-J BCCUQJ
co 01 *o ^3 ^3 c eo CD o js
rH W C! — t d) C 60 0)i-IC%
B C — l U O W JJ CS 0)
U U — < -rt o &0i-l UCO E
0 C > - = C C. JJ O
•^5 ^^ ^3 05 ^ '•^ ft) ^ ^ O Ql
es QCCCJCO^J UC
E E O* O t8 •^J-rtOj
>-. U CJ2 f^iJCDCiC
Uw Uw ^-( Uj fefi C" 3 U -H C
O-CCOOKCGO OR-H T
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ MEDIA: MGT
Legal Services (R548) REG. x APPRO: ARM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The Offices of Regional Counsel are responsible for on-the-scene legal
advice in each of the Agency's ten Regions. They handle all strictly
regional legal problems independently, with ^TTJ.W."" referral of matters
to OGC in Washington, and they identify and collaborate with OGC in
addressing problems with national implications. Regional legal problems
include those arising out of grant awards, review of state programs for
EPA approval (HPDES, SIPs, SWDA and SDWA program delegations), litigation
arising out of approval of these programs and out of individual decisions
under them, as well as such matters of regional administration as
personnel, and Freedom of Information Act.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Most regional offices provided 'adequate review of grant decisions on a
maintenance basis. Backlogs in deciding grant appeals exist. Legal
problems of regional housekeeping were adequately addressed. Review of
state programs and of EPA decisions where state programs have not been
approved has not been uniformly satisfactory. Often, backlogs have
developed or the review has not been thorough enough at the Regional
level. Most regions have few resources to spare for major litigation
outside the grants area or for researching legal problems in detail. Most
regions have major backlogs in rendering decisions in matters where they
must write an opinion.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The only change from 1978 is the addition of six positions to be used
to perform specialized litigation in the grants area. This will allow
us to hold the line on litigation in this one field; it will not allow
more thorough review of grants or any anticipation of grants related
problems.
135
EPA. Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
CODE
RG
R548 LEGAL SERVICES
HEDIM
APPROj
PC M IS
FY eo INCR FY so CUM
a7.0 «7.0
2.0 2.0
57.9 57 . Q
1,408.7 1,04 .7
DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E.
POSITIONS PFT • 57,0 63.0
LEVEL OpFT 6.0 9.0
01 OF 06 FTE 75.6
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 1,617.0 1,667.9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
At this level the Regional Counsels could continue to provide legal advice
related to necessary Regional "housekeeping" functions, to handle grant
appeals and grant-related litigation .to the extent possible, and to
provide a maintenance level of review of grant applications and awards
to catch flagrant errors. They could also write regional opinions as our
regulations require in NFDES and unleaded gasoline cases, but long back-
logs would develop. We would essentially abandon the attempt to have
these offices develop expertise outside the grants area, to have them
review state submissions under other statutes, and to participate in
any way in litigation under these other statutes, except by preparation
of the administrative record for filing with the court.
Legal advice on personnel matters necessarily has first call on the
Regional Counsel's office because they are essential to the operation of
the whole Region. This activity is increasingly resource-demanding as
more Regions become unionized. One region has assigned an attorney full-
time to this work.
Benefits
Would give the Regions a minimal capability to deal with legal problems
of particular concern to them.
Consequences of Not Funding
All regional legal questions would have to be referred to OGC in
Washington, which does not have the resources to handle them.
136
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-ORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PG M &S
LEGAL SERVICES APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUHMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT • 57.0 63,0 . 10.0 57,0
LEVEL OPFT 6.0 9,0 1.0 3.0
02 OF 06 PTE 75.8 6. a 64,3
BUDGET AUTH, (000. OJ 1,617,0 1,867,9 312.2 1,760,9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
At this level the Regional Counsels could continue to perform legal
work related to regional administration.
At present, grants-related work.accounts for 40-60% of the work of every
Regional Counsel's office. In FT '80, with constant resources, that
percentage would increase because (i) the number of Step 3 grant awards,
which generate the most legal business, is projected to increase 50%
over present_levels by then, and (ii) EPA will be pushing hard to delegate
the grants_to_ states. Delegation will not reduce the demand for legal
services as the right to give legal opinions and litigate will not be
delegated. Instead, more lawyers will be needed to review the adequacy
of state programs before delegation is approved. Delegation activity
should peak in FT '80.
In addition, the amount of legal work required per grant dollar or grant
award is expected to increase. The current backlog is deciding grant
appeals is three years and review of grants before award is the exception
rather than the rule. Litigation is increasing in frequency, and the new
Clean Water Act has new grants-related provisions that will generate
legal work. For example, it allows us to render assistance in contracts
cases brought against grantees. Since the plaintiff in such cases is
always seeking Federal money, and generally a large amount, there is
every financial reason to devote some Federal legal time to assisting the
defense.
Benefits
About two-thirds of the current level of advice and review on the grants
program could be provided. Very little could be done in other program
areas.
Consequences of Not Funding
Only minimal legal involvement in the grants program, with accompanying
litigation, delays in making awards due to unanticipated problems, and
waste of grants money.
137
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PG M &S
R5U8 ;,EGAL SERVICES APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
m»m-mm*~~~~m~~mm~mmmmmmm~mmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmm~m~»m9~mmmmm—»~mmm—mmmmmm
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT - 57.0 ts.o 6.0 63,o
LEVE. OPFT fe.o o§o 6.0 9.0
05 OP 06 FTE 75.6 11.5 75,8
BUDGET AUTH, (000,03 1,617.0 1,867.9 171,9 1,932,6
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This is the 1979 level. The new positions it provides will be used to
increase the resources available for grants work. At this level, these
resources would be used to employ grants attorneys who will be experts
in bid protest appeals and grant-related litigation.
Benefits
We would be able to adequately defend most grants-related litigation, and
avoid more growth in the backlog in grant award and bid protest appeals.
Consequences of Not Funding
Grants-related litigation would have to be defended by OGC in Washington
at the expense of program advice in Air and Water; the backlog in grant
award and bid protest appeals would grow.
138
EPA Form 2410-11 (8.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIA} PQ M &S
R5
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOR'- 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A"DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG HEDIA: PG M &s
LEGAL SERVICES APPR0' AGENCY I REG MGT
B RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 7B ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80
POSITIONS PFT - 57.0 63.0 10.0 83.0
LEVEL OPFT 6.0 9,0 11.0
05 OF 06 F-TE 75.6 6.6 95.3
BUDGET AUTM. (000.03 1,617.0 1,867.9 250.0 2,«32.B
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
The new positions at this level would be largely assigned to the Safe
Drinking Water Act and the Clean Air and Water Acts.
The SDWA contemplates states will take over that statute's. provisions for
control of the injection of pollutants into wells, and that EPA will
administer the permit program until they do. As many as a quarter of a
million permits may be required under this program.
The legal demands of this program are very similar to the solid waste
program- In addition, coordinating three permit programs (NPDES, SWDA,
SDWA) in closely related areas will itself generate difficult legal
questions. *
Like SWDA delegations, delegations under this program will be at their
peak in FY '80.
The bulk of SIP reviews will be over by FY '80, since the new SIPs must be
submitted in early '79. However, we will be heavily engaged in writing
SIPs of our own where state SIPs were disapproved, an activity demanding
for more legal .time than review of state submissions. In addition, the
SIPs will be far more complex as a result of their '79 amendments, and
interpreting and revising them consequently more resource-intensive. In
particular, we must issue permits under the CAA too where the states do
not do it.
Under the Clean Water Act, we will be reissuing many permits containing
new provisions to control toxics in FY '80. Permits for POTWs will often
include pretreatment requirements. Decisions in contested NPDES cases axe
now written by Regional Counsels offices, and there are major backlogs.
These new permits will involve much more complex issues, and will therefore
be more costly to write.
Benefits
The underground injection control program and the regional components of th
Clean Air and Water Acts would have a more nearly adequate level of legal
advice.
Consequences of Not Funding
These three major agency programs would be delayed by avoidable litigation
and avoidable court defeats. 1 Lfl
EPA Form 2410-11 (6-78)
-------
J-
u
'Z
cs
^
*
z z
3 •< .
X X
»- X
u 3
u «o
^
C UJ
z u
& QL
-J 0
< m
*• UJ
z z
IU
X »-
z ••
0 Z
z 3
> z
z c
Uj M
05
05 —
iu u
« c
•5 —
a
u< X.
f Z
•• o
z u.
3
0}
UJ
u
.*
>
UJ
in
W> '
z «
o o
— IU
o «J
UJ
z e
11*
7 z z
B
0-
C
tf- **
•»«»
IU
f-
r
M
»»
•5
(MO
c z
7 •»
— Z
z
Q.
c
^
•*
UJ
*
o »-
B •*
0- J
X
3
u
1-
z
UJ
O £
B UJ
» Z
Z
>•
v w
r.
9 OE
— a
3
U
» *-
<
C f~
a a
a m
— **
». M
B ».
a a
a M
- -
f. M.
• •
B ».
a a
a M
. .
~ ••
»» M
c* c»
a a
a M
— ,-
r» M. K> e e »
on r. N. m i^
a a a a in
a a f>
. . .
•• «•• ••
i^^ K> e o »
c c r. t» CM r.
a a a a m
a a >«
. . .
o- o- — e o c
r. r- f- «»i » m
4 ^ M ^ r.
c c ^
. . .
^ •• ••
o o ceo
P. ». it f. 4
•G -a in
o
o
O V
M »• U. UJ
O < 0 0. O U.
• UJ Z 0 — ~
U, X O5 3 O
o «- =• r •• —
3 C « «• 05
— < I CC Z
e t- 05 o
*- Z X >• ~
_J UJ •• UJ < •"
uj tS ^* *^ J *^
> e •- 05
iu3 3 O
_iec o a.
o> « cm
Of. ru r>
& M M ^
r. « O- f-
^ « ^ ^.
- — .1 J
» « an'
• • • •
or. ru r.
« M Kl »
r. -0 e- f-
. . . .
«M •• •• ^
» < cm
Of. ru >»
^ M M O*
r. * g» f»
— — — —
»•» o m
.r. mr^^
— — c in — — o tn
< * m «o * m
o o
0 0
o — o —
•» t-lklU M ^*U.UJ
o < o a c u. e UJZC •* .»
u.x«3o u. r to z e
o — 3 r t» - s — 3r«» —
(M^rs^z M^XZ^Z
o >-«c o ^«o
^•ZX'*^* **ZX>»*M
^JUJ.'UJ^** _1UJMIU^^
m u «i^ ^^ ^M ufu9**^**'«j^14
>c >-« >o «- e
-1 B
O
C
M
O
ru
o
o
M
O
ru
o
•
o
M
O
.
(M
O
e
M
O
(M
B o e e r.
ru o «t — B
a M •-, — »
•» o
. .
ru IM
o in o o »
e ru o ru ru
m M — —
(M (M
» — O O B
r- r- i»> o- in
« M « r.
B V.
^ .
— ^
0 COO
— o m
- -
•.
>- U. IU
•J ^^ 4k Q» **
< o a. c u.
U £ 9 ~o
05 3 e
3 r •» —
X Z Z
>- « o
Z 3* ^ ••*
.• UJ < •*
1^ *^ ^J M*
»- en
3 0
O Q.
B
IM
M
a
ru
s.
ru
M
a
(M
a
•
ru
M
a
.
ru
c
ru
M
a
IM
C B
IM 3
O •- 3 X
in ^ x x
£ ^
*• Z x
i ^j — i^
U CA ^^ ^^
> O
_j e
I
m
ru
J
IM
(M
m
ru
^
nj
IM
m
ru
•a
ru
^
ru
m
ru
^
ru
ru
m c
rjj
ru ^1
. ^
ru
m e
ru o
M •»
ru
— o
»^M
M J3
»»
^
^
C 9
M, f.
e m
.
^
S i&i
c Jjfl
=>•
-^
~ 3!
z
-------
z a.
o <
•- r
»- i
U 5
C l*/
tr u
£L tt
-J O
< 03
O Z
a o
> z
z c
•9
«O »
-------
LU
o
<
o
01
O
C
Q.
i
il
2
U.
LU
s
5/5
O
o
u
z
D
Z
O
O
LU
O
'CC
o
u.
Si
z <
.
< o
O a^
Uj 0.
s <
X
O
O ui
3; CC
ui -
a
o
u
Zoo
^ s^
•—in
UJ —
j^^
H-
— 08
H u
DECISION UNIT
Legal Servic
<
H
Ul
X
o.
o
I
<
^
3
S
3
§
o>
^
u.
O)
Ul
Ul
.1
_1
Ul
Ul
H
Ul
Ul
H
_i
Ul
^
Ul
^
I
^1
_l
Ul
>
Ul
— 1
J
Ul
Ul
— )
> E
U. 0.
Ul
eo *~
^ 5
r. —
> S
U, LU
LU
S
en IH
cs co f^» CO O u^ *T O *G r^
9* en fH
O O H co ON so en
f* *^ \f} *^ o u"i m co en en
eMLOr^ U^T— * eniAO en
CO m rH
»* ^ —
ocnen oo> encsi\oo en
i*1* en ^
cj\ en OA o en i^ o **r *^ e^
Lnvoo Oca' ene>4eoo «o
i-ieni-ieo -c- , en iH
en f-4
mcoo Ovn a oj^
*OO SI O.CU-1 C "3 -H >H U •« U
<8^H -H CO«HO O U^H o ao cocs
uueouc.co o J > coo.
* 03 Q c "^ CO u *^ y *H c **H *f^
oooo eo -<-iuaca a aeo -H a Eu
so -H a t3 M LJ y u U-H i-i ^oa
C« c ats 3 C8 »H 0) y -H3AJ
•H-H ao.cc" c. aa a a aeon
•o i-i c y aa a > — t o. 3 -H
!S O 3 41 -u -J U -HUH U CO aCOO
4) «3 iH J-i u iJ c. 4JO —1 -H C 4)
iH JJ O. •*•! fl i— 1 «J 3>W >-rtDS
s. 33 03 u-iua en u 03 e* o aco
* Vj "^ tS Lj O V^ O <™H CO CO «H a CO > CQ
COOau 3 <4O — 1 S3 •« T-i 33 > 2 03 4) U
«« o u -H o-^ «-i aaa cci— t^i-t a AJ ua
aaccj'^ yca^ •Hcu^asiftiO'H c *o
-H u a. a ic cota o a. s~oa aom > 03 cg'o*a
u a ij-3 co W aajT) c.aa ac u ^ su
J3a>-i fi.4) -rt-H O^^aj *O tQCC. >— I lJ l-iQ aO OT TJ
p^ ^- U f-ft CQ JJ ^ Q (Q ^^ ^2 Ql
1^4 *H u^ y u^ a IM S 0 ^ co IM ^M co u^ u IM *^ a ^
outa 03 ODS o (-1 -H oa o-otj QJJ O-H o oua
to" -3 oc ij aa c TS CB-^
• uw .e «a .U^-H «o -i-if -co «c • • IH >
oj-»o oo of ocsx ou oajij ow oo o oaa
zaa. zy zu z^
-------
o
z
UJ
o
<
z
O
UJ
t-
o
c
a.
Z >
E:o
> 5"
Z W
|
2
a.
O
CJ
z
D
Z
O
o
LU
O
CC
o
LL
..
H Z
Q»
< 0
55
5 <
X
C ui
c
Am
ca
3
C
^«
UJ §
U
O^
• CO
5 <"
IPI
^ fi£
^ N™*--
Z 03
QJ
t u
3 £
^^ ^
o«
e/5 — :
fj C8
Q *
UI
_J
> K
u. a.
UI
K
a 1
^ "
^ *T
LL LU
ai
or
MEASUI
e5
UJ
•J
t»
w»
z
UI
5
CO
mml
a.
O
o
u
a
'
r** O cs i^ in CH CNI
*O >5T CN O *^ f*^ CN*
r* fH .^-t CS fn .
p«. \o vfi \o tn w CM
O C*^ f^ ON OS C*^ CS
f-i »-< f-t CS
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ oo ^y f*4
vo en ON \o >r IH cs
<*i cs m ON \o cs «a-
in VH m ••? +-4 ^ fH
•H *-« CS
cs o *M en f*i ON cs
*^ P*« en o o *H
•H fH . ,
cs in o O ri >a- ^
NO -3- cs eo r*. *4 cs
"H -H »H CS
fl vO fO CS \O *™H ON
m n r^ co r- iH ^
i-l r-t <-( CS
1 1
CO CS
•- W 1 >d
CQ (1) ,£l ^ ^ QQ
W -H 3 y 83 C
0) 0) U 03 < -H ^-(
•3 -o a> c u
01 JJ c c -H a
U, Id 03 O O E 0)
O *H ^t -rt *O JS
•O-OVMBO u u to
u a) u co -a co >.
U 3 S3 OS 00 01 6 *O b
tOOIC 0) iJ U Q) O
i-H >H CO i— 1 ^H OO iJ *J
OI>i-tO fl) 3LM ffl'OeB
u a) a, h -a -on -HOIU
W 0) CMQ)0))-l-H
^3 41 *O 0} O "0 Ui Q "T3 "O
53 ^ 0) T3 ^J "3 CJ ^^ CO mmt 3 0)
030) COEbO) COO) OS r-IO) "^ -I
eoou 3 j-j 2 03 01 w -3 ai
coco CQ*OO> CO 01 00 En CO. CD —!
— Ji »^H -HCOCC C
&.y r-liJ> AJ> -H T3O O03 CV50)
co cgcoo) u_i Q) B 01 -H ca"o u u
CO CU C ^ b COW CO 0)4J WW CM 411
O -nO) 1- OJ U W 0) O C- 03 1 L| 1^
0) 0) C ~~ -H 0) O
^<4 U VM ^J9 00 vw O ^** ^^ £ ^^ W **•* ^^
on o to O-H o ow o 009
•H e ^ 03 01 01 •«
• 00 • C U • K • • U •> • U
OS) O-HCO O-H O OCJ O-* OO)
z a. zuc. zs z z -G zu z-a
_,
s
CD
CN
•
~
^
c
0
^
0.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UN IT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ QPM MEDIA: Met.
Support Services RSS1 REG. APPRO: MDLTI
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES This decision unit provides for:
Central services — building operations, utilities, office services,
equipment, etc.— for all EPA programs located in Washington, B.C., SI?
and Cincinnati and similar services at other facilities operated by
QANR, OTS, and OBD.
"Nationwide" costs of services provided to all Agency programs regardless
of location. These include rents, FTS, postal service, security clear-
ances, and the like.
ADF technical support, centralized employee training programs and support
for the occupational Health and Safety program.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
All necessary support services were provided for program operations at
. headquarters, Cincinnati, and Research Triangle Park. Initial funding
was provided for the concept development phase of the 1980's ADP pro-
curement process, consistent with OMB Circular A-109.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Support services will continue to be provided to the operating programs in
FY 1979. Additional space will be acquired and support services will be
expanded to accommodate new agency positions.
The A-109 ADP procurement will include the preparation for system con-
version and a comprehensive data package supporting a Request for Pro-
posal.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION yNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAi PG M &S
R551 SUPPORT SERVICES APPROj MDLTI
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF os PTE
BUDGET AUTH, tOOO.O) 56,260,0 54,712,1 51,947,9 51,947,9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level will provide funding of mandatory services and costs such as
rent, penalty mail, FTS, utilities, commercial telephone costs, guard
service, maintenance contracts, janitorial services, alterations, and
miscellaneous contracts. This level will also provide minimum support in
areas such as supplies, GSA motor pool rentals, printing, and audio-visual
services. ADP services will include basic support for maintenance, docu-
mentation, limited technical assistance, and audit of two major systems.
Occupational Health and Safety services include surveys of lab facilities.
Activities at this level include Office Services, Building Services, Library
Support, Nationwide Costs, and ADP-Tech Support. A breakout of these
services is as follows:
%
Office Services $ 2,407.7
Building Services 10,868.7
Libraries 941.8
Nationwide Costs 31,307.7
Professional Training 0.0
ADP-Tech Support 1,775.0
Occupational Health & Safety 162.0
Program Lab Support 4,485.0
TOTAL 351,947.9
Impact
Not funding this level would result in a shift of costs to program areas
since mandatory costs must be funded. Some discretionary functions such
as Library and ADP would either be abandoned or funded by the programs as
they deemed necessary.
146
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ "**""MEDTlT
«55^SUPPORT SERVICES APPRO,
B. ^SOURCE SUMMARY ""™"Tlcr?r7rcrr""""Io
"Q5XTION5 P F T
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 56,260.0 5u,712,1 2,764.2 5*,712 1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level provides nationwide costs as well as other support services
if no significant inflation or cost increases occur during FT 1979. This
level will provide for Agencywide professional training including 50
participants in the CSC Executive Seminar Center and three supervisory/
management training course contracts. This level will provide increases
for printing and supplies, guard and ADP services.
Activities at this level include the following:
Office Services $1,179.2
Building Services 500.0
Professional Training 585.0
ADP-Tech Support 500.0
TOTAL $2,764.2
Impact
Not funding this level would result in a level of services lower than that
provided in FT 1978 and force the programs to absorb the differences between
actual costs and this level.
Ikl
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
^ * •<**^*"***
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE MQ M£DIA| pg M IS
R551 SUPPORT SERVICES APPROj MCJLTI
^ 9^1 99 • • V V VVAV 4t^tiV9 •• • • •••W • •)4fr0 • 9 •• • • • • ••• • • •• ^ ^^-^M^^ IB ^ •• ^ ^^ ^^B^^K^ ^^^
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT Fx 79 C. E, FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
04 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 56,260-.0 54,712.1 1,510.4 fe5,213.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level provides the support costs associated with new positions
requested in EPA's FY 1980 Budget Submission. This amounc covers rent
and other nationwide costs for new positions and general support for
new positions located at headquarters.
Office Services $ '162.0
Building Services 150.0
Nationwide Costs 1,198.4
TOTAL $1.510.4
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
u
z
u
V
2 tt
3 <
« r
u 2
UJ z
z c
UJ —
CO
CO —
ID U
t_ tt)
« C.
Kl
O
UJ £
— a
z u!
™
*»
z
r
UJ
e
Z UJ
•< W
IT •«•
>
«* e
LJ
£3 CO
Z
^" *-
z c
z c
« o.
_> a.
ex r
cn
4
< •••
V
•c v.
— cr
9
CO
o
CB
O **
•M cn
J^
^
I
cn
u
A/ O
C Z.
O M«
— 2
Z
4
j
a
CC
o-
—
u
*
CC «
e> _J
— ^
X.
3
l_)
«.
Z
UJ
e- r
CO UJ
t> CC
— &j
z
^
O UJ
f~
o- c
— CT
w
L-
_ 1
f* —
CT N-
— U
i
cr ru
r^ «
9 Kl
tr x
— Kl
in 9
t> IV
f» •O
a KI
0- X
— K?
in 9
O IV
• »
f- «
9 K»
O *
» «
— Kl
in 9
e> IM
»» «
t> ^
* »
•• pt
in 9
o iv N. fw
^*-*<
t> 9 9 «
» » » »
•• Kl CO *^
in 9 9
» IV »- IV
• • • •
*. .e — .e
9 CO A Kl
O 9 9 X
* « » »
•• Kl CO Kl
lO 9 9
— e-
fc » ^ *
c 9 e in
in 9 — 9
e o e 9
e/ 9* ^ «T
« KI iv m
iv iv e ru
* f- e> >••
r> KI — 9
*^
e
c
o »-
0 •- U. UJ
• UJ K O *^ ^^
u. X cr r s
o ~ s r - n o
•• Z x >- —
«J w *» yw * £ ^
a) IS ~ ~ _» —
> c M. cn
UJ ^ ~ #
_> tr ca.
» o
• «
9 in
in 9
— c- «i —
* • • *
f^ KIKI O
« * * *
9 9 0 in
in w — «r
iv ». in o
• • • •
9 f- « —
« Kl IV IV
^ CO fr Kl
« » *
ru ^ iv
— C- M «M
ru KICC cc
— rucc in
^ Kl Kl O
» * « «
9 9 C in
m 9 — 9
s e e 9
e 9 « co
J> KlfU IT
iv iv es ru
r^
tn KV — 9
**
^
^
O "•
W •— U. UJ
c < c c. c u.
• UJ ft O •— <-
u. : cn ^ o
o — r> r «• -
ru « r 2 z
o ^ co o
•- Z x >- —
_) U — U, « >-
> c ^ *o
u = - C
_> tc o o.
•V «S
o —
>- in
K? Kl
* in
•o —
M* e/
o —
p^ «n
Kl Kl
^ m
« —
IV O
o —
^* in
» »
K> Kl
•c m
•e •-
ni e
0 —
*" **
Kt Kl
•« in
* — in —
M * * 0
t- cc co in
fc te rv iv
ni KI co e
— ni co in
» « « »
9 9 e in
in 9 — 9
e e e 9
e 9 « co
^ KI rv m
ni rv e ru
•e r- t> r-
in KI — 9
**
o
e.
e >-
<* •— U- U
e « o ex c u.
• uj tr o «» «•
u. r co ~ e
» •- =• T •• -
=> o « » tn
KI < r rr z
0 t- CO C
— Z x >- —
_l UJ — UJ « •-
u.' t5 ^- -^ _) —
> c •- cn
UJ O Z C
-j tr c a
0 CC
Kl CC
•• P^
ru r-
in 9
« in
e «o
Kl Ct>
— P".
IV f»
in 9
« in
e B
Kl CC
ru *•*
« «
in 9
x in
t» B
Kl B
rv *-
> *
tn 9
* in
o in in B
Kl 9 B B
^ ru B ^*
rv o — 1»
» * » *
in o in c
9 9 e r>
• • • •
O CO IV B
•" t> •« •£
in — KI rv
•M •• —
— 0- rv ru
ru KVCO B
— ruB in
»»• K» Kl t>
* » ^ *
9 9 e IT
in 9 •- 9
o o e 9
o sr « B
^ KI ru in
ru rv e ni
^»Tr^>»
in KI — 9
^
e
e
o —
CO •- U.
c « es c. o
•IU tt O *-*
u. s cn s e
o •- s r «» -
» < r tt z
C t- to O
•- Z x >- —
^ Ui *•* UJ 4 ^
UJ 19 *•» «•» i ^
> O 1- CO
_i CE c a
I
o-
o
o:r:
-------
Cd
-2 H
M <
§i
Ed
M
-J H
O CO O O O >-l O
O
«*
en
in
O
r» es
sO sO
es
O co O O O fj
o -T m o o P»
-T -< O O O sO
en f^ f^ 1-1 •»
« *
i-( es
es O es r+
so in •» P«
en o o> es in so
i-t t-t co
r- I
m
m
en
u
O
M
si
U
to
H
a
o
Su
i
o
co
ON
«s o
m
co m
<• o
CO ^4
§cn o
o m
O en
O «T es O «s H
so in •* o\ n» m
en o o\ «s in so
—i -H eo en
•CO-
CO
es
sO
es
ON
•
sO
CO
m
»
en
•eo-
r»
•
r*.
O
es
sO
CO
m
0 O
in O
O f*
SO i-l
cs en
0 O
m o
O r>»
so FM
cs en
0 •*
0 i*.
eo o
«» eo
es es
0 •*
O f-
CO o
-a- co
cs es
o <•
O r*
CO O
-T CO
* m
es es
O
O
en
en
O
o
o>
m
o
r*.
en
en
o
en
en
o
en
en
O
O
m
F-4
O
o
m
r*
O
es
O
en
F-4
O
cs
c
CO
O
cs
o
en
A
O
o
r-1
O
O
sO
sO
m
0
o\
m
sO
OS
sO
in
O m
m iH
in en
FH en
O u"i
m —4
m en
o m
**H f^
—i co
>H cs
o m
iH en
i-4 CO
1-4 es
O m
F-4 en
F^ CO
-* es
0
O
O
co
o
CO
0
sO
sO
O
SO
sO
o
sO
sO
cs
O
sO
CS
es
O
sO
CS
p.
en
es
p.
en
cs
P^
en
cs
m
co
m
en
*
m
ca
in
C3>
-4
O
O
F-4
CO
F-4
o
o
co
F-4
0
o
F-1
CO
1— 1
m
sO
sO
m
m
sO
sO
m
m
so
sO
m
m
sO
so
in
sO
sO
in
a o
O O
in m
CS r*
0
O
m i
O
O
9
CS
O
O 1
O
cs
0
o
O 1
p»-
sO
en
£
P.
sO
•JT
es
£
P*
co
sO
en
v>
P,
«'
sO
co
O*
p^
CO
sO
en
iH
O
en
o
F-1
•CO-
IS
en
o^
F-1
CO
F-4
-T
GO
?M
Cb
151
a
a e
00 O
CO S i-l
a c 1-1 u
4) • Ti iJ J= — 1
•H & U I-l H 03
F-I -H a o o
a. 3 u c. vu a*
& cr 1-1 c. o
CO
aa
c
M
>
=s
a
03
u
u
M
Cu
b
O
s a 1-13 3
en F-I & 03 e 4)
41 O 3 O Z
*a u o c i— i -H
i-i cu re j-i u
o> ua O U
U • O i-l B. I-l
O3 U S JJ O (0 O
c a -H e o.
•< -H •< — i T3 a a.
en a 03 w 3 u 3
O a s\3 C*
3
w
w
U
M
1*4
CR*
o
*
~
—H
g
03
4)
U
^
j^
4)
03
ts
S
1-J
pn^
•H
3
a
CO
4) a
c u
O i-l
~ u
B.--I
41 F^
41 JJ
H 3
h
O
J3
a
_:
. 41
O O
O -H
F-I >
41 W
tf 4)
03
41
u -a
•—4 hri
iw a
lu 3
0 U
JJ
JJ •
4i a.
S -H
C. 3
•H cr
s aa
er
^3 IM
O
O 4)
a
F-4 a
a —
•u u
c u
41 3
« ft4
eo
c
•H
Q.
(U
01
^
41
a
3
O
= a
a ^~ u
— F-4 1*4
o a c
•H -r4 3
JJ U
a o £
41 -H F-I
u c a
<-H a 4)
u
41 a
U --4
a< S
to
c
o
•H
JJ
• 1"!
jj a
c o
41 Cu
O
%
• 41
0 Z
UJ
= U
M O
U-l
•
— J u
4) >J
&u O
a.
a c.
Z 3
O W
03
Cd
0
t^
>
Si
Cd
03
C3
•z.
F-I
o
1^
M
3
a
*
^
^
H
O
H
a
41
1-1
u
a
u
o
1-4
J
-------
bd
•» >
M
«J H
Cd <
si
u
a
•Mk ^fc
**" ^
M
j H
£3
a =j
J 5
s
u
w
fKl ^te
vN ^
M
J H
£3
M 5
^t pj 2
^j *3
S w
m
C£
cn
w ^
y "
> si
W >
en 2
H
as
O
ft.
cn
i
o
00
p^ £•*
£ So
^ O
tu sa
r« cn
m •*
cn -i
in r-
«k *
O »/"»
r*cn
m •»
o"m*
CM
^fr
r* cn
r- cn
«» «T
in i-i
oo r*
« *
t*. m
•w-
p* cn
•* «a-
m -H
co r--
A *
r«. in
r*t
ff CM O -ff CM O
CM eo cn o^ ^ ^^
» » »
-i CM cn
O 0 r* O 0 0
m m m in I
O co r-
m in CM
iH CM
cn
0 -< CO
co r» eo
O en en
-a- cn es
* *
O ^ CO
eo P^ eo
«» cn CM
• *
0 O O
CM CM r««
o -a- -^
^ CM M
« *
cn IH
C5 C? O
CM CM P»
o «er i-t
•H CM iH
« »
cn ca u 3 M u
to K -H 0) 3 H
U W U-i C Z
•r4 iH 01 iw O i-l
UJ -H i-l O I-I M B
m tn -4 o u OH s
41 0) -8 S . IM < O
03 03 O X E Z -H
to « S ^ u £ u n
OI&IU -H O U • (0
_3 J 4) -^ li U O -J OJ
u cd s a. < >w
<
hd
S
u
o
Cu
en
o
i
<
IM
cs
cn
t£
jj
^
i— (
a
,2
•
u
u
o
&
a
3
cn
±j
^4
o
a
Q.
S
cn
J3
a
o
Vj
o
c.
a
3
cn
jj
2
3-
5
<
o
^
^2
l^^t
&«
e-
o
i
cn
H
0
152
U
-------
U
LU
O
g
u
LU
l~
O
pi*
SI
il
ii
> ^
Z w
LUH
UJ
O
u
o
Z
u
UJ
153
cr
o
M
MEDIA:
APPROP.
S
O
O UJ
L.1
Lrt
^
CO
Si
u
— 1
S
w
u
O
a.
w
_
LU
a
o
u
a
z
^i
LU
^
H
Z
z
o
35
O
LU
O
^
v»
LISNMEN1
&
g
u
0
2
D
S
e
C9
a
>
u»
o
LU
LU
UJ
UJ
LU
^
LU
H
LU
>
LU
J
^
LU
UJ
A
UJ
UJ
LU CL
LU
g<
2 —
> tn
LL. LU
UJ
S.
3
LU
S
cS
UJ
~
—
z
UJ
S
(/S
OMPLI
U
u
<
a
m m m
r^ O O
"" *
O o m
~< o m
.
000
o m o
-ff «T CS
^^ f^ P^
03 <• r^
r» o o
f*^ ^r *?
a
V
cu
c
a
H
C CO
O 99 0)
£1)0)
a a c
o c -<
f-i •* a
cy CD w
0) H
£ >-.
^J W
S) C O
> a to
-j S >
3 60 U
y 9 o
a c a
u z en
1
^
(
ffl
e
*~*
^*
«*
u.
a.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
- A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Support Services (R551)
HQ
REG. S
MEDIA: MGT
APPRO: MDLTI
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Provide complete support services for regioaal program offices. Purchase
of new and improved equipment such as additional laboratory equipment,
and the provision of mini-computers. Provide for the increased costs
of equipment and services which have resulted from inflationary trends.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Provision-of iaproved word processing equipment. Addition of new repro-
graphic equipment. Additionally, ADP equipment added in some regions.
In general, the funding of basic overall support needs in the regions.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
To provide funding for support needs including telephone service, xerox
rental, printing and duplicating, motor pool operations and the regional
library. Some programs include other services such as health services
and counseling that would be provided for if funding allows.
EPA Form 2410-iO (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE """""'"'"
LEVEL OPPT
01 OP 05 FTE
9UOG£T AUTH» (00°.°i 7,300.0 7,698.5 6, 455.9 6,455.9
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Funding ac this level will provide only for some of the mandatory support
services costs. This level would not include many of the services pro-
vided in each region during FT 1978. To achieve this ™-jr|-imim level the
regions would eliminate a mix of services. Most regions would hold
expenditures down by tightly limiting telephone servicer equipment
rental, supplies and maintenance and repairs. Motor vehicle rentals
would be eliminated or greatly reduced. Discretionary expenditures
would be avoided.
Benefits
%
Funding at this level would allow necessary services to be continued
at a minimum operating level.
Consequences of Not Funding
Reduction of funds below this level would cause a reduction of services
and operations in the regions. The actions taken to reduce costs would
have a detrimental impact on program accomplishments. The program
divisions would have to absorb part of the costs of these necessary
services.
155
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OR* 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R551 SUPPORT SERVICES
*EDIA| PC M &S
APPRO | MDLTI
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OP 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
7,300.0
7,696.5
7,917.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
At this level the regions will be able to provide funding for basic or
fixed expenses that are essential for day-to-day operations such as
telephone service, copier rental, printing, ADP services, and Motor
Pool operation. At this level annual physical examinations of employees
who are occupationally exposed to hazardous or toxic materials would
be funded.
Benefits
Funding at this level would allow most regions to maintain pace with
price increases in required services. '
Consequences of Not Funding
Funding below this level will necessitate the curtailment of services
to meet the imposed funding constraint. Additional services would not
be considered and services currently provided would not be adequate
to satisfy support services required at this level.
156
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 25 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE R6 ~
R551 SUPPORT SERVICES APPROj MDLT1
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78"IcT1*FY"7rcr"E7
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTh. (000.03 7,300.0 7,698.5 756.2 8,673.6
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Ac this level all needed supplies could be obtained and the planned and
scheduled replacement' of equipment could be made. Some additional
equipment, such as a mini-computer in Region 1, 7, and 9 would be
obtained. Contract services for graphics drafting, training and
counseling would be purchased in certain regions.
Benefits
An adequate level of services would be provided.
Consequences of Not Funding
Reductions below this level would require deferring of equipment
purchases and supplies in several regions.
157
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FDR* 2! DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDlAj PQ M &S
R551 SUPPORT SERVICES APPROt
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY SO INCR FY 80
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
Oa OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTM. (000.0) ' 7,300.0 7,698.5 218,9 8,892.5
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level of support services is intended to provide for the general
support services costs of the new regional positions requested in this
budget request. This level is based upon general support service costs
of $1,100 per new employee for approximately 200 new regional positions.
Benefits
The general support "costs would be funded for new regional positions.
Consequences of Not Funding
The funding of support services would not be sufficient for the new
positions included in this request. Reductions in other equipment
and service procurement would have to be made to accommodate the new
positions.
158
EPA Form 2410-11 (g.78)
-------
u
2
u,
u
-<
>•
2 at
o <
r- r:
u 3
^>
C. IU
» 2
Z O
UJ •-•
to
to •••
UJ U
>— UJ
< C;
CO —
e ___
«- a:
— o
z u.
^
CO
UJ
u
l_»
>
cr
UJ
tn
*—
X.
in ^
2 a.
- a.
*•* ^
u
•I
o •—
CO <
0- _i
»" O
£
U
,_
2
u;
e z
=3 UJ
o- a
~» u
2
_
to
£>• UJ
^
0 X
CO «
p*- ^
o *~
— u
O- 0
in to
tn ru
a a
*o in
tr c
in* to
in ru
a a
-o in
cr o
• •
in 10
tn ru
a a
.c in
0- 0
in »o .
in ru
a a
* «,
a in
o- a in o
• • • •
in o in KI
in o- •o ru
a po o a
^ ft. «. ft
•cm —in
t> a in o
• • • •
in e tn *o
in cy o ry
a "O o a
ft ft ft ft
^ 71 *~ in
in — a r»
• • • •
CO 0 X -O
Q* ^ fO ^
* >o o a
r^ « — -o
o o o o
• • • •
o o s ru
o c = »o
to *-* j ^^ u, a. ^
o < ev o. c u.
• uJ CC o *•* *-*
U. X « 3 O
O *•• ^ X t* ••
3 C < •- CO
— < r or z
o t— to c
>- z X >• i
_J UJ — UJ < H-
> c •- to
^J 3 « O
—1 CC OX
a ^-
r- o
-• in
o- •o
r~ -O
a >^
r- o
— m
0 -O
" *
a I*.
• •
r- o
— in
o- -c
f- ~C
a r*-
^- o
— in
c^ ^
^ ft.
r- «
a a ss h-
• • • •
r~ -O — s
— ec KI m
0 = a ^
** ^ *•* ^
in o in r*
• • • •
— ^ in I*-
^ o ^ ru
a o -o ru
ft ft ft
••• V* ••«
in — a r»
• • • •
00 O CC o -c
•c « o a
r- £ — *
C O O 0
• • • •
O O 0 rtl
C 0 0 10
fO o ro —
^ -0 — -0
^
0
o
0 t-
V> »- U, UJ
in •- _i «- u. a, •-
O < O Q. O U.
• uj a: o w ^^
U. I « 3 O
o *~ ^ ^ ** ft*
^ C «f ^ to
ru •< r z z
o >- to c
>- 2 X >• —>
_J UJ ~- UJ < 1-
> c< •- to
Lw Z^ — C
_l CE = Q-
Ki in
r- oo
•c ru
co r>.
« o
ro in
I- CO
.c ru
eo r»
•a o-
v »
Kt in
r- eo
•c m
co r^
« 0-
• «
t*\ in
p~ CO
« ru
00 *»
•
-o — in o-
• • • %
f> ift> o o in in
in » in K»
r- o — •£)
in •- a I--
• • • •
ec o co o
O* <£ *O ^
« « o a
r- « — -o
0 O O O
• • • •
o o o ru
o o e 10
m 01*1 —
r^-o — «
„
o
o
o »—
M »- U. UJ
in ^» j *"• u. a. *-
c * e a_ o u.
• UJ X O <•* ^^
*t x co ^ o
o •- z> 3: «» ~
~ o «t «- to
ro « r oc z
o >- to c
*- 2 X >- «-.
_• UJ •- U. < *-
> c ^ "^ •- "tn
uj — ^ c
_jo = a.
in to
ru o-
oo a
co r-
m cc
ru o-
a- 4>
cc a
cc r-
in oc
ru o-
0- ,C
co a
eo r-
tn co
ru o-
0 -C
co a
CD ' »«.
in o in co
• • • •
ru -o -c o-
o- o to -c
cc to m a
03 r» — p..
» o- e>
00 CO • 10
ru ru —
in — a *.
ec o eo -a
a < r a: z
o •- to o
>- 2 X >- ».
_; Uj — uj < •-
> c ^- to
— i CC C CL
I
o-
-------
LU
O
.<
Z
o
K
U
LU
O
c
0.
if
= 1
> to
LU
Z
LU
Z
I
CO
O
O
O
U
UJ
'CC
o
u.
•M
*^.
< O
s<
X
O LU
*^?
tn
I
DC
CO
Q)
-H
I.
JU
CO
w
o
™
c*
^
to
—
UJ
Q
O
U
o
z
««^
LU
^ J
£
Z
D
Z
O
5
o
LU
O
<
._
M
Z
LU
§
CO
0.
O
U
U
^
_J
^
2
o
o
^*
^
"
LU
LU
_t
LU
LU
J
_J
LU
^
LU
J
J
LU
^
LU
_J
S
_J
LU
LU
•4
-'
•T
^
LU
i
•M
C5
o _,•
>• e
u. a.
LU
5 <
a 5
*» ™
^ «/5
U> LU
LU
cc
3
<
LU
2
UJ
.
„
^•B
.
Z
1
<£
Q.
O
0
u
^
a
g £ 0 0 0 S
§m ^
f*^ ~i )S ®
*n fH
^t «- w
en O O O
CM .^ in r^.
• o en m
en •
•co «•
CO vfi S^ ^ ^00
vO r*. CM O O r«»
« «!r in <*
en \o <^ r**
co en en
co in ^ ^ s^ >H
co •«• 1-1 o o m
* fO CD ^^
^i p^ f^ ^^
vO fM CN
u
u e u a) u -H s
> -oft) o uex*j QJO
a) co 010. vu a) o fH » t-i
•o v co -; jj o a. o « c
C -H COCO D. U JO
O^.C u CD^H W003X *MiJ
•HOJO ^S« OOO JJ OCB
AJ ij ed oco o -H j; a) - -H m p
CSCOE oo j: -o) oo ij — < cs
utj no a) 01 cs s — i t- a.
•HO bo cu^ oo> ^MCJJJ cucu
SO.C -HC9 CO COOES Uh
s o T-I *
Z-H ZC8 «SOtJ Ofiu. < 1- E 0) tJ ZEO!
oo
00
2J
o
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Program Management (R55A)
HQ 0PM
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt.
APPRO: ARM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Provide overall policy and direction support to the offices which comprise
0PM, liaison with the Administrator and his staff and with other Federal
agencies in the planning and management areas. Improve program manage-
ment operations within the 0PM. Implement management reforms including
incentives and improved contracts, personnel, and management information
systems. Improve external and internal representation and project'man-
agement for the 0PM.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Improved ZBB systems-including cross-agency-application^ initiation of
regulatory and personnel reforms: increased emphasis on planning,- evalu-
ation and analysis; and establishment of offices for 0PM program manage-
ment operations, management reform, and the Associate Assistant Admin-
istrator.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Continue policy and direction support of the planning and evaluation,
resources management, administrative, audit, and health and safety pro-
grams of 0PM? and complete staffing of new offices to improve control and
management of 0PM resources and develop, implement, and monitor manage-
ment reforms especially in the areas of contracts, personnel, and manage-
ment information to improve sensitivity and response to client needs.
•• 161
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOPM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
**^ *" **^ •••••••<• MW W • V V * IW • • M M * MI^VW W4BM9W •9 • • •b^PV • • • • W <•••• • • • • • A^BwMi A A^^h^M
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA: pG M IS
R55« PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OPM , APPRO* AGENCY I REG MGT
8
0
,' RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
.EVEL OPFT
i OF 04 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.03
FY 78 ACT FY
U. o
560.0
79 C. E. FY !
19.0
3.0
23.3
623.0
5.0
1.0
13. «
100.0
TcTcUM
5.0
13. «
140.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This base level provides only the most broad policy and direction
support to the offices which comprise 0PM. Liaison with other federal
agencies would be minimal. Liaison with the Administrator and his
staff in the areas of planning, budget, economic analysis, and general
administrative arid management matters would be maintained. This level
includes a secretarial position to assist in providing timely and
accurate responses to correspondence and reports, and a motor vehicle
operator to provide messenger and mail services as well as transportation
of 0PM staff to various Congressional, OMB, and other Agency hearings,
meetings, budget reviews, or conferences.
Impact '
Funding this level would provide the basic guidance neseasary to administer
0PM responsibilities within the Agency and with other governront agencies.
Response times for communications and correspondence with program officer
would be adequate.
Not funding this level would require a reorganization with the organization-
al components reporting to a new or higher level of Agency Management or
elimination of secretarial and mail/messenger driver services.
1G2
EPA Perm 2410-11 (8*78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R554 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OPM
HQ
A! PG M 13
APPROJ AGENCY i REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 04 FTE
BUDGET Aurn. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
11.0 19.0
3.0
23.3
560.0 623.0
FY 80 INCR
3.0
i.o
3.0
87.0
FY 80 CUM
8,0
2.0
U,a
227.0
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level includes a mail and file clerk. This position is required to
assist in the processing of incoming mail so that it flows through the
office expeditiously. Two positions will provide for an Associate
Assistant Administrator and a Secretary. The Associate would represent
the A/A at various external and internal meetings, manage a number of
sensitive 0PM projects, represent the A/A on various 0PM programs
including representation before the Steering Committee, and assist the
A/A with the final review of standards and regulations.
Impact
%
Funding this level would provide improved representation for planning
and management activities within and outside the Agency and improved
correspondence management within the office. These benefits would be
eliminated if this level is not funded.
163
f
EPA Form 2410-11 (8*78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOR* 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R55« PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OPM
HQ
MEDIA! PQ H 45
APPROi AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF o« FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY 7
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OPM
HQ
APPRO! AGENCY I. REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
OU OF 04 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
n.o i<».o
' 3.0
23,3
560»0 623,0
FY 80 INCR
5.0
2,5
198,0
FY 80 CUM
i9.o
3,0
23.3
653,0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level would provide five positions to establish an Associate
Assistant Administrator for Management Reform. This office would
serve as the focal point for innovative changes including incentives
to induce more sensitivity into 0PM1 s service - client relationships.
The Reform staff would initiate studies and also act as project managers
for reform tasks, especially in the .areas of contracts, personnel, and
management information.
Impact
The benefits would be a more effective and productive use of resources
and a greater sensitivity to client needs. These benefits would be
eliminated if this level is not funded.
165
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
o
z
U
cr-
<
^.
Z or
D <
« S
t- Z
U =!
uj to
o uj
cr u
—
_l O
« to
*— UJ
z or
LJ
a: t-
z •-
o z
or 3
> 2
2 O
LJ i-<
to
to —
u.1 u
«- UJ
« c
en —
O
*- cr
z H
*- r
z o.
UJ C
I 1
U Z
Z £
r is
<
«* Z
r *
z "
1-1 Z
z *
z a:
< ti>
_JO
O. cr
a
«e
< a
IT.
iO in
— or
9
CO
tr-
ee
o *•*
— to
u,1
z
9-t
03
UJ
(vi c1
CO Z
0- t-
-" Z
z
o.
CO
t>
v«
UJ
_
o *—
CC «
0 _J
— z>
r
rrj
o
z
UJ
O 2
CD [1 '
O or
•• • o
2
>-
CO
O UJ
o- c
" or
6C <
r- 3
c- *—
<
O *G O C
o 9 h- ru
9 ru ru o
— — (VI (VI
o •*> o o
o 9 r^ ru
9 (VI (VI 0
— — (VI (VI
o ^ o o
• • • •
C> 9 f~ (V
9 ru ru c
— — (Vi (V
O *D O O
09 r~ ru
9 ru ru c
— — ru ru
.
r
OC «CC9 CO CCC9
oo 9in—«m r^r- ft a. ry -o
99(vi -N ruruo •-
— ~* — (V (VI (V
OO ^OO9 OO 9OCO
9 9 (VI •- CC CC ^
— •* — *
c^> tnooKi oo inco*t
(vi(vi in*^ ru ru(u in«* (vi
•c •£ in < -c in
OOO90 OOO9C
ooocc»« ooocc~
«O(VI9O— ^^90- —
in9«^9 ma*"9
0 O
0 0
0 •- 0 >-
*f f-U-UJ •*• >-U.UJ
c « c D- c u. o «oaou_
• ujxo *^w^ »uj2:c \--^^
u-itozio ii_xto^o
ot-rsrift— 3 >- 3 s •» —
xo<^to rDo-too
^-ZX>-*-i t— Z X >- *-*
juj^uj^i^ «;uj*^uj<>—
UJ (£ ^^ v^ ^Ji ••* it r r_^ *^ *** i ««4
>O H-tO >C H-tO
*U2 — O UJ3 X> C
_ICC O O. _ltc CO.
0 0-
in 9
in o
9 9
0 O-
in 9
in c
9 9
o o-
9 ^
in 9
in o
9 9
o o-
in a
in o
9 9
"
o o o- e. o cc
in in 9 9 i*v o
in in o — « ru
99 9
*
co t> O es 9
cc co ru *c «- 9
ru ru c
rg ru ru
. ,
o o in o o HI
K> HI 9 O Kl Kl
ru (vi tn •- (vi
•c « in
O O O 9 O
e » o cc — -
^ ru 9 o* ^
in 9 — 9
C
c
o •-
W t- U. UJ
S < O O- C. U.
• LJ or o x^ «^
U. 1C CO ~ O
w ^ n> T" W ••
D C < ^- CO
•n < x or 2
o i- to o
I- Z X >- -<
_l lu «, UJ < *-
UJ O « v^ _J — i
iu ^ => o
_i et co.
o »•
^ •
in cc
•c in
o ••*
m —
in cc
•c in
o ~
M ^
fn «—
in ec
-c in
0 —
f i ^*
in cc
•c in
O O —CO
P*V ft ^ O* f*"
in m CD —
•Q •£ in
%
.
oo ru o
cc cc -cm
t> O- r-
o o in o o
ru ru in —
-c -c in
o o s a c
o o o cc -«
•D (V 9 O- —
in a — 9
"£
c
o t-
W 1- U.
o <: o o. c
• uj cr o •-*
u. x to :; o
o *- 3) TI <*» ••
Ij O < w CO
a < x or z
o >- to c
H-2 X >- »-l
_J UJ "• UJ < »-
> Ct I— to
uj ID 3 c
_i cc co.
Kl
^
ru
in
ru
«
Kl
(VI
U,'
u.
I
o-
o
0113
-------
u
UJ
a
LU
H
o
tr
a.
ii
> «
Z w
UJ H
-4
a.
2
O
U
u
O
UJ
a
a:
O
u.
-J s
.. a.
< O
S<
Su
O
O UJ
— CC
^
>n
in
S£
UJ
O «
O S
U U
of
Z QO
^ as
"™* £
^ ti
•J S
fr«»
^ H
^s
Is
z »•
o
J2
u
LU
Q
<
HMENTS
eu
2
O
u
u
UJ
2
S
0)
tl_
CJ
UJ
UJ
| LEVEL 1
*i
^J
UJ
^>
Ul
1
UJ
UJ
M
01
01
_J
UJ
Ol
« -)•
" O
> K
u. &
UJ
H
S —
-^ *••
> V)
U. UJ
MEASURE
aS
UJ
-J
^»
^
h*
H-
2
UJ
|
VI
_J
i
o
u
u
<
a
r*. r*.
IMri
O r^
. •*.
0 O
*•*
\
p^. rv
i—*
-
0 0
**
U i
S
"8 1
SO Q.
03 0 OB
C 4J «J
§U
OB U
X O
09 (S U
U ^3
g o
Qj Itrt U
—i 0
0 -3
1* We
& 01 O
_ .a a
S £ ca
& 24)
O 2 u
•
^^
OS
OD
f~
.
U.
a.
UJ
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HO. 0PM MEDIA: Mgt.
_ Personnel Management (R572) REG. APPRO: ABM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
GOALS: To provide leadership, guidance, advice and administrative support
to EPA's total personnel management program in a manner that assists managers
to remain in compliance with laws, regulations and policies.
MAJOR OBJECTIVES:
- To support and directly aid the development and implementation of EPA
personnel reforms affecting the hiring and utilization of supergrades and
managerial positions, and associated programs, i.e., merit-pay program,
executive development, etc.
- To support CSC personnel reform .
- To improve operational services at EPA's Headquarters, Cincinnati, RTF
and Las Vegas locations.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
- Participated in the development of EPA personnel reforms affecting the,
hiring and utilization of supergrades and the obtaining of fifty additional
quota and thirty exempt supergrade spaces through legislative action.
- Collaborated in the development of government-wide Civil Service reforms
and drafted a merit pay program for possible use in a. sampling of EPA program
offices. . *
- Conducted three full-scale Regional Personnel Management Evaluation
Surveys and five minor reviews of smaller facets of the personnel management
program.
- Successfully expanded the Upward Mobility, Veterans, Handicapped, and
State Assignee Programs.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The proposed FY 79 activities provide for increased responses in three
ma-or areas: CSC and EPA personnel reforms; support and guidance to the
personnel management function agencyvide; and improved operational servicing
at EPA Headquarters, Cincinnati, RT? and Las Vegas locations.
Primary emphasis will be given to the CSC and EPA personnel reforms- in
terms of implementing supergrade selection and utilization changes, develop-
ing managerial and supervisory incentives, implementing executive and managerial
development and inventory programs and fully supporting CSC delegation of
authority to the agency-level. Of almost equal importance will be PMD's
response to assisting managers/programs meet their day-to-day personnel
needs. The requirement for advice and assistance from operating personnel
offices has increased over the past years and how these offices respond in
terms of proper personnel management, direction, meeting recruiting needs,
implementing organizational changes, developing appropriate training
and development mechanisms and controlling supervisor/employee/labor rela-
tions concerns will go a long way towards assisting the Agency to meet its
mission. 1 S8
EPA Form 7410.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
"ORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
™* » ^ W« W»^ W^W«»^» VM^^M4l9WWW9*B9M««i09M9V4fc9V****9AW«*W*Wt«i4WVW*fc999A
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG M &S
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
**•••>•<••* • •*••*•*•»••«•*•••• •••••••••••(•••••••••••••'•••••HM M ••• «AM«M • •^^
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT • 122.0 129.0 94.0 94.0
LEVEL OPFT 66.0 98.0 57,0 57,0
01 OF 08 FTE 268.7 192.7 192,7
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 4,000.0 4,770.1 3,278.6 3,278.6
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
This Unit includes the Personnel Management Division in Headquarters
plus the personnel management services provided at Cincinnati, RTP and
Las Vegas.
PMD develops agency personnel management programs and policies relating
to position classification and management, compensation, manpower planning,
development, recruitment, affirmative action and field evaluation and
provides operating personnel services to Headquarters employees in the
Washington, D. C. area.
Cincinnati, RT? and Las Vegas provide operating personnel services to
operations in the field including many ORD laboratories. »
At this level, basic operating personnel services would continue to
be provided in the areas of classification, employment, training and
employee relations. The services would be limited to processing personnel
actions on a much delayed basis with advisory and assistance services being
provided only on a "crash" basis. Competitive personnel actions would be
processed in_150 days, non competitive actions in 45 days. Agency personnel
management policy and program development would be limited to 2 or 3 major
issues a year with support and guidance to regional personnel offices
being very limited. The involvement of PMD in Agency personnel reforms would
be ad hoc and require taking resources from other program areas. CSC
reforms would be implemented only where additional resources were not
required and PMD would not seek to assume additional delegated authorities.
Only 50% of supergrade actions would be processed with no position manage-
ment or policy advice. Labor and employee relations advice, would be provided
but overall program direction and written guidance would not exist. There
would be no involvement in'labor negotiations, arbitration cases and
negotiated grievance procedures. Training program development would consist
of contract training and employee training requests would require 30-days
to process. Agency employment and classification programs would provide
"appeals" services and limited advisory opinions but would not be able to
pursue new policy development or implementation of the new FES classification
system. The Executive Development Program would be limited to identification
of participants on a three-year cycle with limited executive inventory
capabilitity (two searches a month) and assistance in training plan develop-
ment and request processing. Two field evaluations would be conducted on the
status of personnel management programs and effectiveness of organization
management. College recruitment programs for minorities and women, handicap
programs, co-op programs, intern programs would receive limited attention.
16$
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
Overall, most of the basic services required by law and regulation would
be provided but time-frames for completion would be very long and advisory
and consultation services would be cut to a TTT"in 1171^11.
IMPACT
Benefits of 'funding:
A basic personnel management program would be maintained. However, this
would be a min-fmai level where legal and regulatory requirements would be
barely met. There would be inconsistencies in the administration of personnel
policies and programs and managers and employees would not be able to
obtain a meaningful level of advisory service.
Consequences of not funding:
Personnel programs will be curtailed to the extent that legal and regulatory
requirements in the areas of recruitment, employment, merit promotion,
classification, and position management would not be met. The personnel
management program could not be viable and could not contribute to the
Agency's mission.
170
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE MQ MEDlAj PG M IS
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROf AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 122.0 129.0 20,0 1U.O
LEVEL OPFT 66.0 98.0 10,0 67.0
02 OF 08 FTE 268.7 ga.S 217.0
BUDGET AUTH, tOOO.O) U,000.0 U,770.1 636,9 3»915.5
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
At this level, basic operating personnel services would be provided in
the areas of classification, employment, training and employee relations
but the timeframes for processing actions would be 25-30% shorter and a
minimum level of advisory and assistance services would be provided.
Competitive personnel actions would be processed in 115 days, non-competitive
actions in 30 days. Agency personnel management policy and program develop-
ment would be expanded to include 3 additional major issues per year. In
addition, advisory services on employee relations matters would be provided
on a systematic basis in matters such as conduct and discipline, adverse
actions and incentive awards. PMD would be able to provide basic support
to Agency personnel reforms and pursue their implementation in an agressive
fashion. Number of supergrade cases processed would be increased by
202. Employee training requests would require 15 days for processing.
Agency employment and classification programs would be expanded to provide
limited advisory opinions and issue new policy guidance and FES classifica-
tion direction on 50% of major activities. The Executive Development
Program would be on a. 2% year cycle with executive inventory capability
expanded by 1 search per month and training plan development and request
processing increased by 50%. An ad hoc reporting capability would be
provided in the area of personnel management information s stems.
IMPACT
Benefits of funding:
l
More timely processing of supergrade cases and day-to-day personnel actions.
Basic level of advisory and assistance services to management and field
offices could be maintained. Less delay in filling key executive positions
and the Executive Development Program would be minimally functional.
Agency personnel reforms would be supported at a minimally acceptable level.
An ad hoc personnel management information system would be available.
Consequences of not funding:
Tall back to Level I where legal and regulatory requirements would be
barely met.
171
EPA Form 2*10-11 (8.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ HEDIAj PG M IS
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG HGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CU*
POSITIONS PFT • 122.0 129.0 u.o 130,0
LEVEL OPFT 66.0 98.0 8,0 75.0
03 OF 08 FTE 2b8.7 19.9 236,9
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 4,000.0 a,770.1 5Q4.6 4,420,1
a DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THJS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
At this level, basic operating personnel services would be provided but
the time-frames for processing actions would be reduced by an additional
15-302 and advisory and assistance services would be responsive to program
needs. Competitive personnel actions would be processed in 85 days, non-
competitive actions in 20 days. Agency personnel management policy
and program development would be able to handle most major issues on a
timely basis and provide written guidance. PMD would, be able to support
Agency personnel reforms in a responsive manner. PMD would seek to
assume a limited number of authorities which can be delegated by CSC.
Number of supergrade cases processed would remain the same. Agency
employment and classification programs would be supportive of most requests
from the field and issue new policy guidance on a timely basis. "An Honor
Awards Program would be implemented and nominations would be processed for
honor awards and non-EPA awards within available time limits. Statutory
reviews in the area of classification could be completed with 10% audit
of positions and limited position management advice and feedback. Direct
assistance would be provided in labor negotiations and resolution of
grievances and unfair labor, practice charges. The Executive Development
Program would function on a 2 year cycle with executive inventory capability
expanded by 3 searches per month, and training plan development and request
processing would be done on a timely basis. Services for personnel manage-
ment information would be provided on a limited, as available basis. Three
field evaluations would be conducted.
IMPACT
Benefits of funding:
More timely processing of day-to-day personnel actions. Advisory
and assistance services would be maintained at an acceptable
level and policy guidance would be issued in a timely manner. The
Executive Development Program would be in compliance with CSC regulations
and be responsive to Agency needs. Agency personnel reforms would be
supported and CSC reforms could be assumed in limited situations. Overall,
the personnel function would function as presently established.
Consequences of not funding:
Fall back to Level II where services are "reactionary" and extremely limited
Program would survive but not be fully supportive of Agency Management.
• J» ( fm
EPA Form 2410-11 (S-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG * 13
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 7
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
'FORM a: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ HEDXM PG M &S
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPRO: AGENCY & REG MGT
8*" *E SOURCE* SUMMARY™"™*" ? 8 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 122.0 129.0 6.0 1«2.0
LEVEL OPPT 66,0 96.0 09.0 129.0
05 OF 08 FTE 268.7 73.6 323.6
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) a,000.0 4,770.1 • 175,0 fl»770.
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
At this level, basic operating personnel services would be provided but
there would be more time to work with programs on addressing specific
needs, e.g. custom-tailored training courses, technical state-of-the art
training, special organization studies, recruitment programs etc The
overall time to process competitive and non-competitive personnel actions
would level-off at 60-65 days and 10-15 days, respectively. Agency
personnel management policy and program development would be at a state
wnere policies that are not absolutely necessary could be developed with
much grater emphasis on work incentives, awards, and productivity. Nearly
all supergrade cases would be processed in a timely manner as much of
the manpower increase at this level would be dedicated to this area and
a complete executive manpower planning study could be conducted.'
participation in personnel management evaluation surveys would increase
sy one major survey but several special studies could also be performed,
i.e., career training, merit promotion plan operation, etc. An Agency-'
wide Career Systems Program would be developed and tested. The new
Personnel Management Information System would be completely implemented
at.this level.
IMPACT
Benefits of funding:
More timely processing of supergrade cases and executive positions.
Management advisory and assistance services would be able to react and
plan for all personnel situations and programs would receive a high level
of consultation services. PMD would have the ability to evaluate each field
organization every three years and perform special evaluation surveys of
selected personnel areas. The Executive Development and Resources Staff
would be able to develop and test an agency-wide career systems program.
The new Personnel Management Information System would be implemented.
Consequences of not funding:
Fall back to Level IV. The major negative of not funding would be the
elimination of the Personnel Manatement Information System.
EPA Form 2410-11 (S-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIA: PG M I™""
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROt AGENCY & REG MGT
*****—****•••••* W<* ***••****••••• • •••«•*•• 4V ••«•*«•*•••• •••"•••••••••••••••••IWfliW
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT - 122.0 129*0 142.0
LEVEL OPPT 66.0 98.0 58.0 187.0
0<> OF 08 FTE 268.7 82.7 406.3
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 4,000.0 4,770.1 350,0 5,120,1
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
I' "^rwwital activities are represented by a contract to
services in terras of performance standards development and provision
»?? supervisory/Banager training, the refinement! testing and
implementation of a merit pay system, and overall assistance in developing
policies and programs to support and further the goals of personnel
reronn ana the Career- Executive Services.
IMPACT
Benefits of funding:
The above stated activities will be completed.
Consequences of not funding:
The provision of services in the above stated activities would have to
be provided on an ah hoc basis which would detract seriously from other
personnel programs and not provide the Agency the capability it needs.
175
EPA Form 2410.11 (3*78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
1 •• W Mk W ••• ••• MB !• V 99 W^> • • W • •• IM • ••• W • •^^•W V)(••'••••• • • V • •>• • •• tf4V V V>^9M4k^ttt^^•4^^^flP
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIA} PQ M &S
R572 PERSONNEL HANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
•«««•>•«*•••••••••••»•«••••••<••••••••§•»••••••••••••••<••»••••>••••••••••••••
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 8Q INCR FY 80 CU*
POSITIONS PFT • 132.0 129.0 4.0 14fe.O
LEVEL OPFT 66.0 96,0 1&7.0
07 OF 08 FTE 268.7 3,3 ao9,6
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 4,000.0 4,770.1 100,0 5,220,1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
ACTIVITIES
At this level, the incremental activities are represented by increased
day-to-day operating services in the Headquarters, Washington, D. C. area
because of 390 new positions and approximately 680 reprograasming actions.
The increase in employees -serviced will require additional efforts in all
areas of personnel management and, based on a ratio of 1:100, four
additional spaces will be needed.
IMPACT
Benefits of funding:
The increase in new positions can be met with a level of service* equal
to that presently provided.
Consequences of not funding:
The increase in new positions will place an additional burden on the
Headquarters operating staff and the level of services will be reduced to
all program areas in terms of timeliness and quality of service.
176
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
9
™
m
<•* «•.
— • «*
z z
o <
»- £
•- £
U 3
»•»
o uj
OS U U
QB 31 >
3 ~
_/o »«-
•» 09 C «
t»» UJ O _j
Z tt — 3
«U Z
I l- 3
Z — U
O Z
tr 3
> z >—
z o z
lu •— u.
<0 0 £
uj u o- z
•— UJ •»• (J
•» c z
05 —
a
u* X
f a. t-
—t O en
z u. e- uJ
~ o- a
— a
3
f- 3
O> »•
— U
z
£ Z
(3 £
< *X
£ Z
<
«• £
U —I
z u.
— z
z z
z c
< n
_) e
a. u
a.
~7 * £
•a in
— e
• • • » • •
too- in — o o
nt o o- 43 9 —
mm mm 99
wj - IP 9 — r-
e o* in •«* o o
nt o o 49 9 —
(•^ f^ f*^ **^ 9 9
• • • • • •
co » m — e o
n» o ^ *o 9 •*
. . . . . .
mm mm 99
4! — IT 9 — »-
te t> in — o o
«MO «> -a 9 —
mm mm 99
j jj o — e o r- m in o 9 e o o — — o r~ o o »
» to o » 9 r- ru m in o — a r- r- o o o o o m •«
f*»niir>9Ou^t> . — 9K-9-»43-» r*i irt f. ••— p-s f. KI
nirwo •• ff to 4} — o o m o o m 4> -o m o o o-
ccep9r.ni 4343onuoo9 99 949099
r>niiri9O>iP9 m»rur.»ni-»ni oo -a — —
ni rv o •• 43 4) 1/1 in^ to 9
. . .
mm m
— — o ru o o >-- — — o rw o o t~ — . — o ru o o P-
r. 4S 9 — ni f-4S9—m P- 4> JT — IM
... ... ...
999 999 999
oo o o o oo a o o oo ooo
ee oni'd oo o rvi 4) oo orv-c
co iwni49 eo ru ru « oe rv rv 43
o o f- — ooi»<- oer»»
99m 99m 99m
- — »
•«• ^. **N
ooo
o e o
O 1— O *— O ^
«— . J— -;3£.« —
— O3CZ
_iu7-uj<~ _;(.] — *<" -.w-Si""
>£ ^-»5 >C >-« >C ^l«
•kj 3 3 O UJ 3 3 C UJ 3 3 C
_< c co. _jc OCL _.e oo.
•
-»» in *• m ^^^
• « « • o-
IP m o 49 o
in ni r— 9
99 99
- in - m
in m" o* 49*
mm t» 9
99 99
• • • •
mm 04}
m n. r. 9
. . . .
99 99
«- in — m
mm o 4>
mm >» 9
. . . .
99 99
•»*>»omooe •"•—omo
in m m m ^ c o o r~ m ^^^^
o«"O9r.ma9m r.?.9m /^^^^^
mm n»»* m r.4) 9 ^^^^H
999 999 ^^^^T
^^^^
OOO*»43 *» «.4>>»4I
•• •• ^ •»> w *>•
*>»>**oAioOf. ••••onjo
^.4} 9«» nj r*»<43 9«>
... ...
999 999
OO O9O OO OO
oo om49 os orv
oo ruA,4S oo r\irv
oor~— oof.—
99m 99m
t
o o
e o
O K. O
»•— _J'«U.O.'>- tE— J«->IZ
e — Si"~
>o .-in >c ^.«5
144 3 3 O UJ ^ 3 ^
_i z o a, _j S ca.
-------
z
k.
U
«
>•
Z Cr
«- X
u en
cr u
a E
-j c
< in
Z c
fck>
x K-
c z
a 7
> z
z c
u. •-
05
CO •»
U. U
^ UJ
« c
2
r z
t2 *r
< UJ
« «
X. Z
ts _i
Z W
z z
2 O
« tn
Ci Z
e- —
>
e •-
e <
«> j
X
u
O- C
•" U
z
v.
O- UJ
e> a
— B
• »
G —
ni «
-• »»
in «
c
fg
rw
ru
m
•u
ni
na
ni
IV
e «
• •
ni ni
o -c
• •
o- •»>
ru i
in i
e o in
in in «w
e o o Ki
— rw *. x
— » o co o e «
e r~ K> 0 <« •» i>
_ _ o «\i e
o e e i
e e mi
e e »
_ _ o ni o o «-
<•< a.
o C
u- i « s c
O •- = T •• —
3 O « »- c»
•O « X (C ^
O t- «f! C
_ - X >- _
_> tu •• u « *•
•» «- b. ui
e ~ _i~u_ o. —
o « o t O te.
• uj co •»*-
ki. i tc r. o
3 — 3 r •» —
~ C, * ~ ei
r»« X Z Z
c »- to o
•- Z X >- —
_1 UJ — Ltl •< ^~
HI ~fi
W «k w
> C
UJ -
-J O
CO.
> c
•• as
» o
o a.
-------
UJ
a
o
H
U
tu
O
X
au.
2 >
uu
ED
> »>
2 WJ
wo
O
U
u
Z
179.
cc
o
u S
30 BE
S <
< o
g£
Ul Q.
O*
O
d
O uj
x e
£J CM
oZ
u C
a
NIT TITLE (AN
Management
0 «
Z s
DECISIO
Peraoni
<
CO
Z
Ul
§
^
i
o
u
u
Ul
<
.j
5J
£
™*
w
O
ca
en
f»
S
4
Ul
Ul
.J
^
_J
Ul
Ul
_J
1
J
Ul
Ul
_J
H
LU
Ul
d
Ul
Ul
lj
Ul
>
Ul
-I
g
is
LU
K
e» S
>
U. UJ
MEASURE
a3
HMENT TITLE
1/5
3
ACCOMP
03
1 I I I 1 1 1 I I II
•» ^ 0 0 ul oo (*> |
^2 «« IH <• tn , [ 10
— — ^ -_
^ S voSSSSvO 2§
F^f^- f*1* '"^'C'CNCN1^ O l/^
^^- GO 04 r»*
^ CO-CM o \Q ^CCN in "^ O O
^ p^
CM^^O a tn *NI «% *-* *
Q^ PNJ 5*1 O Lrt i*^
-H £ ^ N
CM 'i u
0 «o 5 2 -4 c
i u M ^ £ - °
2C O.U -iJQy
2^ xujo 3 ,OO(3
"~* ^ii'O S S tie-..2lM "" ^
^ • SM W CQ 3) M «H ^ w fn U^ L^v
UJ 300 y C WcSffl *• ^ 1-
2* ?? rtt ^ ^ ^ "™^^M Ua u u - >- C MC W>
_2™SJ50 Jj J)O WO) D-, y SQ OJO U c a) — i
If II 1 Is Is II i 1 a 1? la 1 »
09
f*.
oo
ex
J|
|
S
u.
Q.
UJ
-------
LU
a
<
•z.
o
K
a
Ul
r-
O
cc
a.
Z >
w s
H
0 I
= 1
> w
Z co
U.K
LU
to
3
0_
S
O
O
o
H
i
D
o
LU
Q
CC
o
u.
-1 S
00 CS
2 <
< 0
s<
-
Z
O •
O LU
(N
r—
D£
_ e
LU O
11
2 w
-
01
IV
H
~j
LU
^
LU
_J
4
^
Ul
4
u
J~
^f
j
H
LU
>
LU
J
H
LU
LU
-J
LU
LU
en
en _;
*" O
u. e.
LU
H-
00 ^
i 1
> 1/5
U. U
LU
Ct
5>
LU
LU
^
P
h-
Z
LU
2
2
C/9
j
a.
1
u
<
a
9) 0) o) 0) ai
€ E E E E
w B ca as to
w w en w en
en ve es o O r^ in
<• <-* C en p*.
00 vO
e>T
fi >a 1-1 o o m m
<• fH o n r^
m >o
A
c*
m m o o O ^ m
<• ••« O r*.
••
O>
o m o> o o CM o
ON ^ "^
CO
m sr oo o O IH o
eo " - »
00
tn in c O O -a- in
>a- i-i o m r»
^
m m o o o ^r in
-------
•<
CJ
LU
a
u
LU
H
o
IT
a..
LU
u
•z.
LU
181*
'EC
O
u.
•u 3
ao a
Z <
.. al
< O
ui §:
s <
2
eu
O
O LU
Z S
CM
S3
>"*
E
Ed
U
<
Z
u
Ui
Cd
s-
.•M
LU
a
o
u
o
z
s
LU
£
._
Z
3
Z
O
3
u
LU
a
<
en
H-
UI
—
a.
5
O
u
u
UI
c«
t-
-J
i
§
O5
>
u>
LU
UI
j
UI
UI
«J
u
UI
^
UI
LU
UI
UI
UI
4
Ul
UI
a -j
LL. a.
LU
03 ,5
i 1
> 5s
LL. LU
LU
E
^
V?
^
UI
5
cS
LU
^
P
Z
LU
^*
^
C/}
3
a.
2
O
O
U
ta
?I
3
tn
iri
o»
00
a
a
o
^
u
u
a
a
0)
H
^
S '
s
o
a
M
9)
c- -a
bw 99
O 33
(U
P U
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A} DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ MEDIA: MGT
_ Personnel Management (R572) REG- X APPRO: ARM
B! LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
EPA Regional personnel management activities have a three-fold purpose:
1) to assist management in the development of sound organization and
management philosophies,
2) to ensure the Region recruits, develops, and maintains the best
staff, and
3) to ensure that all employees are treated in a manner consonant
with applicable laws, Executive Orders, and regulations.
Cl FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Accomplishments in FY-78 include performing the basic functions of
position classification, staffing, and processing. In FY-78 the
regions processed 7,961_personnel actions, conducted 1,033 desk audits,
and developed 1,058 position descriptions.
*
The regions also ran 118 in-house training programs, prepared 1,093
individual training plans, maintained responsibility for EEO reviews
and affirmative action programs, and offered various employee counsel-
ling services. Finally, functions pertaining to labor relation
activities and management and organization studies are performed.
Di FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Because of the on-going supportive nature of the functions included
in this decision unit, most of the programs will be largely unchanged
frotc FY-78. However, there will be some new program thrusts. The
bulk of the Factor Evaluation System (FES) will have to be implemented
in FY-79, a task which will require standards drafting, position
description format conversion and orientation. In addition, the
Agency will emphasize the self-evaluation program, affirmative action
programs, and the development of performance standards.
182
EPA Form 2410-10 (8.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
TORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PQ M &S
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROt AGENCY & RES MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. £. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 87.0 91.0 68.0 68.0
LEVEL OPFT 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0
01 OF 06 FTE 112.4 95.2 95,2
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2/213.0 2/103.2 1,644.7 1,644.7
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Level 1 provides the core programs of position classification, staffing
and personnel data processing, although all are subject to increases
in backlog and turnaround time from the current situation. Few desk
audits would be performed. No position management studies would be
performed. FES would be implemented, subject to delays which in some
regions might jeopardize the six-month time limit; there would be
minimal supervisory training in FES. Active recruitment, including
affirmative action programs, would not be performed. Periodic delays
in filling positions would be experienced in all regions (sporadically
in some, and double the current rate in Region X). Basic processing
functions would be performed, subject to delay during peak periods,
e.g., changes in health benefit programs during "open season."
Requests for training would be processed. Overall efforts in the
employee development area would be limited to clerical functions.
The incentive awards program would be administered; basic employee
benefit information (health, retirement, etc.) would be provided.
No initiatives would be taken in the areas of mental health, alcoholism,
etc. Labor relations would be reactive, e.g., negotiating contracts
if necessary and responding to unfair labor practice charges.
Benefits
Funding this level allows for the maintenance of a basic Agency
personnel function at the Regional level. Only those activities which
are mandated fay Civil Service regulations would be performed, often
subject to considerable delays.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level would eliminate the personnel management
function as a Regional activity. Mandated personnel activities would
have to be administered by Headquarters. The volume of activity
would result in unacceptable delays and backlog, activities so per-
formed would not be Region-specific, that is, would be unresponsive
to Regional priorities and needs. Working relationships with the
Regional offices of the Civil Service Commission would be difficult,
if not impossible, to establish and maintain.
183
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE""*"""™" ""NED" IT"^"""!!""*™"""
!!IL!:!!°"!!eL MANUGEME*7 * APPRC, AGENCY & RES MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY "FY""™T*F""7*"™™"rio'lNCR"""?"™™
POSITIONS PFT 87.0 91.0 ja.O %2.0
LEVEL °P?T ' 12.0 15.0 10 if o
02 °F °6 FTE ul 4 e a ,£,!
BUDGET AUTH. (000,03 2,213.0 2,103)2 392^ 2,0375
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Level 2 improves the timeliness of the core functions and addresses
most current personnel programs to some extent.
FES would be completed within the 6 month limit. The number of desk
audits performed would be approximately 757. of the FY-78 total (excep-
tions are Region IV at 25Z, Region VII at 102, and Region VIII at OZ).
Some management studies are performed (Regions III, V, and X). A
number of Regions (III, V, IX) begin outside recruitment programs,
while others (II, VI, VIII, and X) still limit recruitment to the use
of CSC registers. Regions III, VI, and IX begin in-house training
programs, Region V and X expand on existing programs. At this level
most of the regions provide individual development plan programs.
There would still be little activity in the areas of employee rela-
tions. Labor relations programs would be minimal, limited to contract-
negotiations where necessary.
Benefits
Funding this level improves the quality and timeliness of the core
functions of position classification, staffing, and processing, how-
ever, some delays would still be expected. The regions would have
some management study capability and would begin outside recruitment
and employment development activities.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level would reduce the Regional personnel program
to a level below what is required by CSC. The program would be
extremely reactive in nature. Only minimal processing functions
would be performed, often with unacceptable delays. There would be
no management analysis capability in the regions, and no active
recruitment or employee development activities performed.
184
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
Af DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RC *€UIA| PG * iS
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY 4 REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INC* FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 87.0 91.0 9.0 91.0
LEVEL OPFT ' 12.0 15.0 5.0 17.0
03 OF 06 FTE 112.« 11.6 115.2
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2/213.0 2,103.2 189.7 2/227.2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
The resources provided at this level would staff all regional personnel
offices at near current levels. Consequently, the core functions of
staffing, processing, and position classification will be performed in
a timely manner. Desk audits would be performed in most regions for
all positions advancing to the full performance level (exceptions are
Region VI which will be capable of performing desk audits on only 10%
of positions annually and Region VII which will perform the""minimal
10% plus any controversial positions. Region III would implement
a local self-evaluation program. A majority of Regions (III, VII,
VIII, IS, X) would expand special recruitment and EEO activities to an
effective level by conducting outreach programs, college visits, etc.
Employee development programs would begin to receive more emphasis.
In all the regions in-house training courses would be arranged either
by contracting with outside consultants or the CSC. A number of
Regions would offer orientation programs for employees. Regions III,
VIII, and X would conduct training needs surveys. The regions will
have limited employee relations and labor relations programs. Employee
relations programs would key only on the most critical areas such as
retirement counselling.
Benefits
Funding this level provides sufficient scope of personnel and organi-
zational services to meet most significant Regional needs in a. timely
manner. Some flexibility is provided in the program, thus allowing
the regional offices to move from merely reacting to immediate work-
load demands to a point where they can provide a more comprehensive
and innovative level of service.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding this level would retain the reactive nature of the program
evidenced in earlier levels. While core programs would meet regulatory
guidelines, little would be done in the areas of special, non-mandated
programs, such as employee development, and employee and labor
relations.
185
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
z
tr
Z E
O «
— X
*• X.
L. 5
UJ IB
•~
C1 UJ
tt U
a c
«: 09
s a
u.
I >-
z —
S 5
> z
z o
09
09 —
Ik U
•- U
< c
^>
(19 —
m
O
UJ X
— c
— o
z
z
CO C
z cr>
o e
cc
o- ~
— O9
ru u
CO Z
— z
z
e- cc
""5
t*l fr
O CD
m o
A! IV
ru _
ru ru
rw «—
rv —
w e- in o- cc — in
7 c ** m ^ ••• &•
« * in
m in o o o e «
i- or- a rw«\i «
p*i t> w «r co — o
o e- ec —
rv AJ o o
pn -o ^. « — in rv
o in w in o» — —
— c t> —
(V >- — r—in
ru co o-1- o- — —
»-*» woo*
t> (> .e o- in —
»••«<»• -»o- — —
runj — —
e e me e
• • • • •
e 9 -c «v ru
rv ro o o o o c
"^ « ^ « —• innj
» IT sr n o — —
— e e- —
ru ru —
i « •» « — in «u
> «n a in
_. e o-
ru ru —
« w _i ^. u. n. ^.
e < o a. o u.
• uj d o ^ *-*
— < i e r
o «- to o
_J UJ — UJ < —
co-
w »- u. u
« — j <-»u. a N-
e « o c. o u.
r> O « — «n
nj < r a z
c "-me
_» EC cc.
ru ru e
ru ru tv
o
o
•* •- U.IU
•o *^ ^ ^^ u. c. *-
e « o o. o u.
•UJ CC C — —
o •- co c
_JUJ — UJ « ^
o a.
o e — o c
pom e K- ru
rw ru o
ruru ru
o
c
•o ~* _< ^. u, 0- *•
C « C Q. O U.
• uj a o *~**
- C « «^ «9
O ^ IB O
_J UJ — UJ < •-
> p
uj :
Cl
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RQ MEUlAj PG M
R572 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT APPROt AGENCY & REG HGT
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FYSO
POSITIONS PFT . 87.0 91.0 2.0 93.0
LEVEL OPFT 12.0 15.0 17.0
04 OF 06 FTE 112,4 2.0 117.2
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 2,213.0 2,103.2 50.0 2,277.2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level provides two additional positions to be used for Regional
personnel operations. These positions are based upon the additional
workload that the Regional Personnel Management Staffs will incur as
the result of the new regional positions included in this budget request.
Benefits
This level will enable the Personnel Management staffs in the Regions
to absorb the workload associated with the new positions requested
in this budget.
*
Consequences of Not Funding
The Regions would have to absorb the additional personnel workload
associated with the new positions. Delays in processing time would
result.
187
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
0
LLI
o
<
z
o
K
u
111
K
o
cc
CL
2 >
LU c
11
o I
2
u
5
§2
_j
c.
5
O
O
U
<
H-
2
U
U
Q
SI
z <
.. ^
< 0
-5£
5S
X
« ®
O LU
X C
u7^
§=
U >— '
is
Is
ujg
j S,
£ tn
ISION UNIT T
sonnel Man
o "
gfi
<
M
^
UJ
•^
CO
Zj
o.
Q
O
s
UJ
>
<
^J
3
3
CJ
i
^
>
u.
e>
_>
LU
LU
^
1
1
_l
LU
>
UJ
_J
,1
"I
_l
LU
>
UJ
-J
-1
_J
UJ
>
LU
_1
H
_j
UJ
>
UJ
_l
-1
_l
LU
>
LU
_!
2 -»
^ o
> cr
U. 0.
LU
s<
0 2
>£
U. UJ
LU
C
in
<
LU
5
*
LU
u
t-
K
K
OMPLISHMEN
u
u
ffi
OOin fH rH^ t/^eMr^a\u<^
(-JVOVT' ^4 PvxO tMCt£o>00
sr » o ' S In S
-i p* rn •«• »-i
OOio i— i ^^^ mr>ir».osm
^«^O*^ t~^ P**\O CSfnr**ONGC3
ffl^^O •» r«. OCMO ON
P- (n •* rH
^^CNIPH o cniri o\*ycsco*n
p^-r-. o tntn vrvooNr».fM
's-oom n fH C^ONCM oo
i*» ts " m 1-1
Osroi »n tno tn o r^ «n \o
Oo\m p. tn r-t oxmeotM— »
^«in ^ 0 r-.coo\vK
f» tM tM
C3Oin i-l ^ ,_) ir\e\ir^o\m
ig^o? "i r»vo cMtnr».o\oo
CO & \O •& r^ OCNtn o\
f"» «n sr >H
fn*^ f~ eo-H otMneoeo
^"*>»* <-H eo\o i/Ni. CJCJO) ODCTS ffli-( EO
cucoc 33-H cocs cna. s
• U lj O "3 U U 01 iJ CD l-i 00
•o OI-H B*JI-I w to o*j aoc
0) CD • 00 U O CD UJ OOIW OS O-H
•" C CBSS O UJ Li 0) -H WO) I- >
OO WCO rH 01 Q. X«M & E a *4
3-HCS-rtCOS 00) CL, OJ
-oij ^Hgiw cuc-o o) tH c coo ecu
go. « ^H -^oe'ca-ai u ^ c u
O"H i^*OX *O"HSCO O 5wS CO Q) *H U
W>-| 0. CS » SAJOJ^O) 0)> C
u Ess 4-1 a . u AJ . 30) vice
too) o f-i CONC^CJOX tr «o scu
•UO) UCOU -HQSSiJS 0) ^0)
•^ "O l-i JJfi-rtO O. Ui^^ JJX
"O i-HOO CSiJCOiHOO tB Q
3c o en — i cueosaioioiao (903 01 •--
*o C-HCO E^UWCBC c -c an.
-i e>s oioo CC-H -n-i SslOC
BAJ OUJ OOrHt-IOOe C> oSl.CC
Ji -H CD « . CCO-HO) CO 0. U -H-.1 S «•»•-
a co- LJ aeco GJJSC ^ cocu S-B i s
41 OT3 41 3-rtO) W C 4) 4)"J U C • C S
•o c. 01 e. a) 1-1 e c e c a. us- u -H-O -H e
ft. -OO.OOO) O« 0) •
uj ujo uj uj a) — ( uj 11 — , jj uj UJU-O uj ujjj uj uje
0 O «M O OCU O^JiJCU O 0 1J O OS O OO
0) -HC SiJ.fi. COO Q, — <
• •> • «S"H • — ^ CD • *4)U • "41 • »JJ
O OO) O OUU OOJOuj o O-HO) O OlJ O Ct5
Z Z -O Z ZJJO. ZUC.O Z ZUU 2 Z O, Z ZAJ
CO
r*»
to
fN
O
fSI
E
o
u.
<
a.
-------
u
LU
(J
LU
O
cc
a.
oi
si
> «
2 C/5
Q.
O
u
H
Z
D
Z
O
u
LU
Q
'CC
O
U.
s <
.. oJ
< O
2 <
X
S2
C
o
It
'•3
b
e
0
u
§1
A
_ 4J
*™ g
^ cu
LU §
-i ac
£ a
H ?
2 S
3 "to
II
to ca
S S
Q **
<
CO
2
LU
J£
5
Q
U
u
^
3
5
O
CO
o
-^
>
LV
LU
LU
LU
LU
-1
•4
_j
LU
>
LU
n
^j
LU
>
LU
NJ
^ j
LU
LU
-J
-1
LU
LU
O
2 ->'
O
^* CB
U. 0.
LU
t—
cn S
«— —
> U5
UL ^J
ul
MEASUR
efH
aO
LU
^
t
^
i-
2
LU
5
V]
I]
0.
C
U
U
0
CO CN
ts
00 m
^
ts cs
^o <*^
s ^
00 CM
oo PI
cs
00 CN
C2 f^
m
• %4
Q -C
4J CQ
C i-t
ca
ao -H
a
CO u
•a e
LJ a
§ 0
C0 ^j
,
a ca a]
> DO)
•H CO 00
w C iJ
c oa
y co"y
c
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ 0PM MEDIA: Mgt.
Contracts Management R574 REG. APPRO: ABM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
To provide procurement support to Agency programs including:
Developing Agencywide procurement policies and procedures.
Negotiating and Administering all contracts in excess of $10,000.
Managing the Agency ' s smut 1 business and minority procurement program .
Reviewing and approving reimburseable agreements with other Federal
agencies .
Providing small purchases services at Headquarters , RIP , «r>rf Cincinnati .
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Estimated total awards in FY 1978 are $242M. This is an increase of- $25M
over FY 1977 awards of $21711. This is the result of an increase in pro-
ductivity from $3.4M per negotiator to $3.8M per negotiator. However,
this increase in awards did not keep pace with the increase in workload
carryover funds increased slightly. ,
Dl FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Funds available for award in FY 79 will be approximately $346 million,
which includes new obligational authority plus the FY 78 carryover.
Efforts will be made to increase awards through increased productivity,
larger awards, project officer training and additional program liaison
officers. Increased awards to small and minority businesses are also
planned.
190
EPA Form 2410-10 (8.78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG M &S
R574 CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT APPROt AGENCY & REG MQT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 166.0 177.0 133.0 133.0
LEVEL OPFT 11.0 t2.0 9.0 9.0
01 OF 07 FTE 192.2 167.« 167.8
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) a,560.0 5,220.1 «»1I1«1 «»lll.l
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Contracts management's major purpose is the award of contracts, inter-
agency agreements, and small purchases in support of the program offices.
Projected funds available for contract award in FY 1980 are $396 million
for new work. However, at this level of staffing, obligations will amount
to only $176 million. Thus, less than half of the funds available for
award will actually be awarded, and of 20,400 purchase order requisitions
that will be forwarded to CM in 1980, only 17,300 of them will be placed
with contractors.
A staff is required to support the negotiators and small purchasing agents.
All are designed to allow the negotiators to concentrate on the award of
contracts. These support personnel include direct management of the
negotiators, program support, review staff and small and minority*business
officers. Since the procedures for award are prescribed by law, elimina-
tion of any of the support personnel would only result in a transfer of
that burden to the negotiators or non-compliance. Because of the external
reviews of the contract process from General Accounting Office and the
contracting community, non-compliance would be counterproductive.
Responses to contractor appeals and protests will occasionally be met but
the major emphasis of the Contract Appeals, Protests, Training and Manage-
ment Branch will be on contract review to assure compliance with Federal
Procurement Regulations. Interagency agreements will be placed at the
current rate which results in an acceptable backlog. However, indirect
cost rate negotiation cases completed will barely equal the number of
new cases received and the backlog will remain at 14 years of effort for
this section. The Contract Planning System will be maintained, but in-
depth analysis of contract operations and workload scheduling will not be
possible.
191
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL °ROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE MQ M£DIA| pj « Is
R57« CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY i RES MST
6. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 166.0 177,0 26.0 159.0
LEVEL OPFT ' 11.0 12.0 1.0 10.0
02 OF 07 FTE 192.2 10.5 182.3
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 4,560.0 5,220.1 620.« 4,731,5
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
The 27 additional staff provided at this level are allocated as follows:
16 negotiators
6 clerical support personnel for negotiators and contract
administration
3 small purchasing agents
1 cost analyst
1 clerical for indirect cost rate negotiation section
Additional negotiators and direct support staff at this level will al-low
an increase in contract funds awarded of $65 million.
An additional 3,100 purchase orders will be placed.
\
An additional 140 cost analyses will be provided.
Impact
Carryover will be reduced to $155 million. This amount would be
unacceptable to program offices in that it represents 61% of one year's
entire contracting effort at this level.
Substantially all of the small purchase requisitions forwarded to Contracts
Management will be placed with suppliers.
182
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2; DECISION UNIT L£V£L ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAJ PG M &S
R574 CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY CY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 166.0 177,0 18.0 177,0
LEVEL . OPFT 11.0 12.0 2.0 12.0
03 OF 07 FTE 192.2 H.8 194,1
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) a, 560.0 5,220.1 088.6 5,220,1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
The additional 19 positions provided at this level in excess of Level 2
will be allocated as follows:
9 negotiators
5 clerical support personnel for negotiators and
contract administration
1 cost analyst
1 indirect cost rate negotiator
1 clerical support person for contract information
and planning system
1 program liaison
1 procurement analyst
Additional negotiators and direct support staff at this level will allow
an increase in contract funds awarded of $35 million.
An additional 140 indirect cost rate negotiations will be concluded.
An additional 140 cost analyses will be provided.
Impact
Carryover would be reduced to $120 million. This amount is an increase
of $50 million over the anticipated FY 1979 carryover. This increase
in carryover is resulting from the Agency's increasing reliance on the
private sector to accomplish program goals without adding sufficient
additional contracting positions.
Sufficient staff is available at this level to assure reasonable quality
of contracts issued. Contract and cost review staff will be available
to respond to most procedure and policy issues. Implementation of
Federal Procurement Regulation changes will be timely.
The backlog of indirect cost rate negotiations will be cut from 511 cases
to 371 cases, thus allowing additional contracts to be administratively
closed.
The one position assigned to program support will begin to interface with
program offices to improve the quality of workscopes, technical evaluations
and justifications for non-competitive procurements in an effort to reduce
procurement lead time.
193
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM 2; DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ M£DIA| PG M IS
R57« CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 166.0 177.0 s.o iss.o
LEVEL OPFT 11.0 12.0 1,0 . 13,0
0" OF 07 FTE 192.2 9,ft 203,5
BUDGET AUTH, (000,0) a,560.0 5,220.1 201.0 5
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Allocation of the 8 additional positions at this level is as follows:
6 negotiators
1 clerical support for negotiators
1 cost analyst
Additional negotiators and direct support staff at this level will allow an
increase in contract funds awarded of $24 million.
An additional 140 cost analyses will be provided.
Impact
The additional contract awards at this level will reduce the carryover
from $120 million to $96 million.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R574 CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT
HQ
MEDIA| PG M &S
APPRCt AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPfT
05 OF 07 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C, E.
166.0 177.0
• 11.0 12,0
192.2
a,560.0 5,220.1
FY 80 INCR
30.0
1.0
25.1
545.0
FY 80 CUM
215.0
ia.0
228.6
5,966.1
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Allocation of the 30 additional positions at this level is as follows:
20 negotiators
5 cost analysts
5 clerical support for negotiators
This incremental level is proposed on the assumption that NOA funds
available for award will be increased by $79 million for expanded programs
over the $396 million currently estimated as being available in FY 80, and
that this increase in the level of contracting will be permanent. Using
the anticipated productivity in FY 80 of $3.9 million per negotiator, 20
negotiators will be required. The ratio of support personnel to negotia-
tors is 1:2. Therefore, 10 support personnel are needed for the 20
negotiators.
195
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
>
UJ
Itol
C2
<
>-
Z Z
o «
•- X
u 3
UJ OS
^
o uj
z u
& z
«J C
« o»
^ uj
z z
UJ
r •-
z •»
o z
z 3
> z
z o
UJ *•«
05
« •»
tL> U
to. UJ
« c
05 •»
e
UJ Z
*- c
to» o
z u.
z
UJ ^
£ Z
UJ U
» r
< UJ
z u
4 <
z r
<
- z
LS n
z *-
M u
2 <
r K
< ^-
-i r
a. e
i_)
«
< ^
**
* tn
— tt
9
C
P
p^
V
O1 —•.
•• CO
UJ
*-•
«t
s
*»
03
U*
fW (.9
«c 2
o- M
— Z
2
«
•J
a.
».»»
1C
c-
UJ
^
O ^
9 *
o- ^
*" r
3
U
i"
2
iu
0 Z
C) UJ
o- a:
-• o
- Z
^-
en
o* w
p»
o- a
w tt
~
u
— t
c> <.
»-* 3
^ ^
— ' U
4
— — Ifi +~
• • * *
— .. — m
— a me
— »» f- r*
a «•> a a
— — m »*
• • • •
«- a me
— r- t*. t*
* •* * *
am a a
— — in »»
• • • •
*• •• •« m
» a m »
— P- f» Kl
» * •> *
am a a
— _ tr* r*
— — .in
— a me
— •- r> m
* * » »
am a a
~
— — o — o c » •• »».«~m«- —
* » » •* * *
a a m a a a
— — o — o o e aa am « nicu «ru —
— o — r- — — « x in
» •. •>
a a m .
— m * m c o rvj »iri«mooru
ooeor-ruru oo-eoo-ruru
ta o — v* r- ~* a- «ve-"»nt».—»
ru — — •» — _ rv — " P- — —
•Mn a in in a
o o o « o o o o o « o o
o o o o- * — o o o o- « —
^ i*> ^\ a «o ^" ~- *ft *^ ^^ a *c ^
ina«>«»*" ma — — «—
a a a a a a
e e
c e
o >- o ^
m •- u. uj f. — u. uj
^ i^ ^ ^* ^ CL *" ^ *^ ^ *"* UL t •"
o < o Q. c u. e < o c- o u.
• uj a o «> «• «iuzo «*•»
a. X cr I: = u.i«n:c
o — ss»- c«-sr«» —
se«~«e ~o<^'«'5
— < I Z Z ru«ZZ Z
e »- 05 o o *- tn c
^-Z>«>-«- »-2x>->—
_JUJ»-UJ«f- _< UJ — UJ « H-
UJ^^^-^^.J^* UJt^ta'^^.J^^
>C •— 05 >C *-O3
uj= r> c uj u = c
_JC CO. _>C OB.
•• m
o e
ru in
ru •-
in a
— m
• •
e e
ru in
cu f-
» »
tn a
• m
• •
e e
ru in
«v ^
to •>
in a
•« m
e e
(u in
ru •-
w ••
in a
— «^ 9 m e e —
o e e o »» «\i a
ru — —in »- — e-
rv — — p~ — —
» % «
m in a
« « « e e c
09 a v rv ^
no a — —
a a a
— tn « m o o tr e e K. ru IM
ru e •• in ^* — e*
ru «— —^- •• —
in in a
e e o < o o
o c o c- •£ —
•A **^ ^v a - «
_J UJ — UJ < *•
Uj Qj »^ %p* ^ —
> C >- 05
UJ 2 — —
_l EC O O.
— ru
«• m
ru m
a o-
in a
— ru
•• m
ru . m
a »
in a
•• M
• •
•• m
ru m
a o-
» •,
m a
— ru
«• m
ru m
a »
« to
v> a
— — o ru e c in
•- *- e m in mm
fu — »••> «o — s
a m — » •• ru
to to to
m in a «
e e 9 o o a
— — ru « — e-
e e e
ru ru —
— tn *m o e ru
e o- o o •— ru >\J
nj o — in »» — »•
ru — — r- — —
in tn a
e c o* e e
e e o» * —
in s — — >-
a. a- a
o
e
e ^>
M to- u. U
to* «^ ^ ^» U* i ^"
c < e a o u.
• uj z e ** top*
u. i m r e
O »- 3 T » —
3 O « »» es
a < r z z
c r- tn o
>~ z x >- —
— * UJ — uy •* •-
UJ a to. to. _) «•
> C •- «5
UJ 3 3 C
—1C CO.
— ru
* o-
•C ru
e a
m in
— ru
• •
•c o-
•o ru
e- a
to to
in in
•* ru
• •
•£> C-
« ru
o- a
to to
in in
— ru
« 0-
•c ru
o- a
in in
— — e ru s
« * e » IP
« in — ru —
o- « — a ru
to to to
in in in
e o e o
in in o c
a a m o
o e o o *-
ru e — in *-
ru — — f. —
IT IT C
e e e .0 e
o e e ^ «
•A* *n f^ a ^
in a — — —
s- a a
9
e
o
«•> ^>
to. to^ ^> ^* U.
e « o G.
• u c c
u. I os 3 e
O — 3 T •» —
3 O < ** 05
in « r a: z
0 to. CO C
^ Z x >• N-
«J UJ •» UJ < ^~
UJ O ** w J»«
> C to. O5
UJ 3 3 S
_l ff Ob.
-------
— X.
>- r
u —
C Ul
IT U
O. X
Z. IT
UJ
Z »-
2 —
C 2
> 2
Z O
UJ —
n
n —
UJ U
03 —
ws
C
U. Z
•- ce.
— 3
z u.
z
LJ H.
r z
k. W
e r
« u.
z u
< <
r s
<
— x.
U 09
2 *-
"• U
Z «
2 Z
* ^«
-i r
a. c
7 ^-
o- A
— to
— 2
2
z
3
U
Z
u.
e z
fi UJ
» a:
— u
z
-------
ai
O
<
O
u
Ul
H-
o
cc
c.
UJ
O
>
Z
LU
a.
O
O
o
z
o
'S
O
u.
eo
s z
OS
.. B.'
< o
O- ^
ui a.
s <
s
Cu
o
O ui
5
Lft
C£
4J
£
CU
. £
0)
oo
a
£
a
z
CO
o
c
iJ
C
0
o
Ul
o
o
CJ
a
z
^t
UJ
r^
L^
H
Z
3
Z
O
c
u. a.
UJ
H
S ^
O} S
»- —
> M
U. Ul
UJ
I—
MEASUI
eB
Ul
.j
K
f—
Z
Ul
2
52
_!
CV
O
U
u
<
ea
-
^
•K •
O o O 1 in o i-i
co O> CM i vo o\ r-.
fn 1 t fn *a* m
CM
^^
§00 i mo — i
CN CM i s£ c^ r*«
en i s£ *a* m
rt
sr o
o o o i >n o IH a)
r*. CM CM i CM er\ r>. u
CM iH 1 in -ff fl JJ
vH H
*» 03
• e
i-i m o i in o i-< o
•v m CM i co m ^ O U < 01 UCU CJ C
COOCOO03Q) Vd —403 93C
00 ^ W O ^ *J2 U *H *7 CC 70
•HUO)«(1>S03T! CO ^103
p*4 w ^3 fH *O 3 O C CO ^^ U
•fiCOU hZUMC £ •— C
OOOCO>~' O iu o 0)*^
^H O O JJ ±J QJ CC
uumucoc toeoco -HO
1-1-1— ^— Q)flju<-i4j coji 1QQ
u -u u e uwxi^o^o — . - XwO
£ £ W3 k^co E £ &0 CJ 00 •£ CO
OOSZ2QJ33CUCOGj) E^ «^
uua.--'s->.zzz6az *
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ QPM MEDIA: MGT.
Facilities & Support Services (R576) REG. APPRO: ABM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Provide management direction and review of Agency programs nationwide in the
areas of facility construction, space acquisitions and management, engineering
repairs and improvements of laboratories, general services and audio visual
functions and provide operational support services at Headquarters , Cincinnati
and RIP, North Carolina.
Acquire laboratory and office space to accommodate FY 78 and 79 position in-
creases. Provide necessary space planning, building, audio visual, and gen-
eral services support to occupants.
Provide Repair and Improvement program which, will stress a safe work environ-
ment for our employees and also protect the Government ' s investment in pro-
perty.
of
Provided agency— wide policy for facilities and support services program and
operational support servicing 4200 employees at Headquarters, 800 at Cinn. and
1300 at KIP. Completed consolidation, of major portion of copy equipment at
Headquarters into 10 copy centers with estimated cost savings of $90,000. Ob-
ligated $5.3 million for construction of three new facilities located at Man-
chester, Wash. , Cinn. , Ohio, and Ann Arbor, Mich; obligated $2.6 million for 17
repair and Improvement projects to provide safe and healthful working conditions
for laboratory employees; supervised preliminary construction design work for
five projects involved $8.4 million. Rene gotiated major leases at RTP, NC, ft
incinerator, mercury monitoring complex, emergency preparedness center and
space for 8 additional laboratory modules. Realigned space at Waterside Mall
and Crystal Mall to relocate and more equitably distribute existing space amon
program offices. Conducted telecommunications, printing, and property reviews -
ASfn<##?ffo1stei DESCRIPTION
Provide management direction and review of Agency programs nationwide in the
areas of facility construction, space acquisition and management; engineering;
repairs and improvements of laboratories, printing & distribution; mail, tele-
communications, and transportation management; personal property and supply
(in-house and contractor controlled); audio visual support; energy management,
and administrative services. Operational support includes space acquisition
and planning, building services; printing procurement and print plant; motor
pool, mail and communication center; provision of supplies and equipment; per-
sonal property acquisition, accountability and marfgement; and graphic, TV,
photographic, and conference support. Develop and implement agency-wide policy
and innovative procedures for the management of energy conservation programs;
more accurate accounting of mail costs; acquisitions and utilization of space;
and, centralized audio, visual activities.
199
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2! DECISION UNIT tEVEL ANALYSIS
. OE c i s i ON'UNIT""" TLE'IND "c OD e ™ ""
* REG MST
BUDGET >UTH. (.00.01 ,,876.0 S ,,;
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
At this level the following services will be provided: obligate
$1.7 million of $3 million available in Repairs and Improvements
funds (R&I), manage $2.7 million in construction funds;
process mail in 3 days vs current daily processing; provide
audio visual support only to Administrator, DA, AA's, DAA's,
and their immediate staff; process telephone changes within
4 weeks vs current two weeks; provide in-house printing only
to the Administrator with a 3 day turnaround, all other printing
requirements requests would require 10 day turnaround; process
printing procurement in 6 weeks vs current 3 weeks, process »
work requests within 'A months vs 3 months.
At this level the following services would be eliminated:
self service store, mail shuttle, preventive maintenance
programs with risk of costly repairs and excessive downtime,
government inspection of all plumbing, pipefitting, and
building support done by contract; program electronic
equipment repair; delivery of supplies from warehouse at RTF:
and centralized imprest fund, teleticketing, office machine
repair, and moving services at Cincinnati.
200
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MgOlAi P6
"576 FACILITIES t SUPPORT SERVICES APPRO! AGENCY i PEG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY9c FY8o
POSITIONS PFT 200.0 199.0 31.0 182.0
LEVEL OPFT - 11.0 18.0 4.0 islo
02 OF °6 . FT* 225.2 21.2 211.9
BUDGET AUTH. tOOfl.O) a, 876.0 5,004.6 76s|o . 4,571^3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Funding at this level will provide the following services:
obligate $2.0 million in R&I funds; manage $3.0 million in
construction funds; process mail in 2 days; provide routine
graphics, video, and photographic support to Program offices
with 5 to 7 days turnaround; process telephone orders within
3 weeks; provide in-house printing requirement within 5 day
turnaround; process outside printing procurement within 5
weeks; process work requests within 75 days.
The following services would restore at this level: the Head-
quarters mail shuttle and self service store; preventive
maintenance programs; program storage support; electronic
equipment repair; centralized imprest fund teleticketing,
office machine and moving services and TV production and TV
program distribution at Cincinnati.
201
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R576 FACILITIES i SUPPORT SERVICES
HO
MEDIAJ PS M IS
APPROt AGENCY & REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OP 06 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
200.0 199.0
11,0 18.0
325.2
a,876,0 5,00a,6
FY 60 INCR
17.0
4,0
14,2
' «33.3
FY 60 CUM
199.0
19,0
226,1
5,004,6
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Funding at this level will allow sorting and processing mail
on a daily basis In WSM with one-day delay delivery to CM-2
and the new location; in-house printing with three-day
turnaround (2,900 hours of overtime); printing procurement
with 3-week turnaround (1,000 hours of overtime). Audio-
visual support- can.be provided for 2,000 of an estimated
2,400 graphics jobs, and 1,350 of an estimated 1,470 photo-
graphy jobs (4,000 .hours of overtime to meet present
requirements). White House referrals and public inquiries
will be processed within 3 days; telephone changes within
two weeks (after phone service has been provided to new
location); process 575 of an estimated 698 building modifi-
cation requests (with overtime); process 84,000 of an
estimated 110,000 telecommunications/airline tickets;
obligate $2.2 million in R&I funds; $3.3 million In construc-
tion funds; perform only critical safety related construction
or repair projects.
This level restores delivery of supplies from warehouse;
inspection and maintenance of contractor work: sales store,
distribution and warehousing functions.
202
EPA Form 2*10-11 (8-78)
-------
u
z
&
^
^
z z
o <
« X
»- X
u -
\u tn
o it*
E U
n CC
3
_( C
< to
^* u
z o:
UJ
r »-
z —
o z
a 3
> z
Z^»
w
ID
to ••*
IU U
t- IU
« c
to —
a
it. r
»- a
•— o
Z ta.
«
U
•«
^
e
IU
k- CO
Z
iu a
ta a.
« a.
z 3
v n
£
••
•0
in
Z —
•*» ^»
2 *•
2 -J
< N-
^i ^
a. •«
Ik
-3 *,o
^
« in
— a
a
CO
*•
e
c^ *•»
•«•»
^
z
•M
*-
e
IU
Alts
e z
o- —
— z
z
^.
_J
Q.
n
o
•4
tu
„
o «-
CO •«
^ ^
— 3
r
"
UJ
o x
o u
C^ ff
— u
z
C0
cr- uj
C- K
""£
u
F^ 3
ff ^»
•w ^J
^
CO —
0 9
e in
M m
M f.
CO —
e 9
e in
M m
» •
A *"
e 9
c in
% %
M
m ^
to «•
O 9
co in
« «
M M
MM o f- c e ^
CO O <0 — — — 3
o a 9 in •- o-
co te in — —
MM M
MM o ». e or.
CO O - in o —
co i» — in /M
» « «
99 9
•
0*
O
O
O I—
M to u. IU
e < o a. o u.
• " i ry o «^ ^
u. r » r. o
o — 3 r «• «.
r e < ^ «
— < x a z
e *- en o
^ z ^< ^ *•
_J UJ — UJ < •-
aj 'J — — _1 —
> C >- W
tej ^ 2 C
_J CC CD.
^ „
f- in
in ni
9 9
M M
«• v
^- in
in ni
9 9
• •
^ ««
•» in
in m
^ «
9 9
M M
_ _
P^ m
m ni
» «
9 9
M M O M O O »
— (M tf — ni m —
»- ^ in to — —
in in iw— ni
99 9
o o o -o o e 01
M nj — o- — 9 —
•C -O O M a a
-C O -O 3 O —
p» in «MM e —
to ^ "• in AI
^ » «
99 9
^•i
O
O
9 •-
» r- u. UJ
o •« e Q. c u.
• (U Z O ** *^
u. x « 3 es
o — 3 r •» —
3 C. •*.* 0>
nt •< r ar z
o •- too
»- Z x t. —
iS ~ ~ * —
> o >- to
u/ — = o
j a: o a.
JS M
9 9
o in
o -a
in 9
4 M
9 9
o in
0 •«
in 9
41 M
• •
9 9
o in
o -a
in 9
•£ M
9 9
o in
o -o
« %
in 9
d •£ O M O O —
9 9 O 9 O- «* «
o & -»in o — AJ
o » * — ni
m 9 9
MM O O tS 9 A»
f^ ftj «• M ^* 9 9
M M O •" • •
99 9
^ « O M O O Al
9 9 O 9 O* to tn
O -O 9 in » — M
t> O* ^ *• Al
» « ^
in 9 9
o o s f. => e
« 0 -0 9 0 —
f-» in Al M O ••
9 t». »tn ni
^ * »
99 9
^P^
~
O
O ^
M *• ik. IU
o « o o- e u_
• tu a o »» «-
U. I 10 2 0
o »- = s •» —
3 o < *- tn
M < z a: z
t» >- to o
•- r x >. —
>u u •— « _j 1-1
> c ^ tn
_ic c a
-------
CJ
01
O
H
U
01
»-
O
e
a.
2 >
UJ
E5
> «o
2 je
UJH
01
2
X
CO
_J
a.
5
O
g
CO
u
01
O
"C
O
u.
.
H S
il
-. al
< O
?? ts
-Q-s:
UJ a.
s <
s
•«
Q.
O
d
O ut
3Z C
x«s
VD
r»-
in
as
SB^
trr*
uj J,
go
O-H
u >
Qu
_0)
5««
<
~~4J
Ul U
-JO
H- 0.
tZ °-
H 3
HOQ
^»
2^5
3
2 ™
1"
tOAJ
02
SH
Qy
ce
1
3
s
=>
U
o
CO
0>
»•
>.
tl^
1
_l
Ul
Ul
_J
_J.
Ul
>
Ul
_j
1
_j
Ul
>
Ul
-1
J
H
-J
Ul
>
Ul
_J
H
_l
Ul
>
Ul
-I
J
1
1
•w
Ul
Ul
_J
tt
r«
• S
>i
U. ft.
UJ
_, »-
CD <<
si
>S
U. Ul
Ul
c
3
CA
Ul
5
_•
CO
Ul
_J
1-
H
K
z
Ul
§
X
(/)
Zj
c.
5
O
u
u
<
CO
o o o o o o
in • O o • • O O
mco.^-iin
i-t i-t rn «ff sr «N •»
^H
m (N O o -» O
r-( « vO CM . .OO
• o« • o5<-' o *OAJ
M i y a E eo u
& o e ai to u So)
X VJ « U ,U C f-<
•O ^1 D. C -H O 0) CO i-i
V 0) O E C O
•a •OOJJJ^T-I a) oo
•HC- UCJ5O M -H
>OUO)-Hw^ 5 JJU
O-HOI-OS c. o oo)
^ jj W W £ 03 O OJ C.
c. cc ^~. o eec i- o.co
UJJ OIOC C. EGO.
m jj e oj > -H — i e
ij to CD c -^ jj 1-1 c. •H'O
O'rtta o j-i u 01 «H *o a)
CSC J= C' 41 OJ woiXi-l
h-H ID a. eu c. cx-v uo u u
.uE E « >to-HOitnffl a) ^ OrU.
c-ooji-faieooH-Or-iiMo eUH
oa u u u 1-1 c K vo. et o)
U MHCU u t. coa:
^n.
^
^
IN
O
^"
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ MEDIA: MGT
Administrative Management (R577) REG. x APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
Upgrading of word processing equipment to allow for intercommuni-
cation between all regions. This equipment would allow for the automatic
transcribing in one region of correspondence originated in another.
Evaluate the feasibility of going to an advanced system of micro-
graphics for all records management systems.
Evaluate the costs/benefits of doing in-house photo-type setting that
would give the regional offices the capability of printing report mockups.
Evaluate the feasibility and costs/benefits of library contracting.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1. Upgrading of reprographic capabilities.
2. Upgrade and expand word*processing service.
3. New standardized filing system implemented.
4. Review and implementation of better telefaxing machines.
5. Development of a graphics standards manual that outlines what
format will be used for reports, stationary, pamphlets, etc.,
6. Addition of teleticketing capabilities.
7. Regions given authority to deal directly with GSA to acquire up
to 5,000 square feet of additional space,
8. Mini-computer added in some regions.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Program activities foriT'79 will provide administrative support services
to the technical and administrative program areas with respect to pro-
vision of services which include:
1. literature searches;
2. micro-fiche services;
3. cross-reference library service and direct program technical
information service;
A. procurement information and services;
5. imprest fund;
6. contracting services;
7. liaison responsibilities with the General Service Administration (GSA)
in the areas of records management, technical reports management and
f o rms mana gemen t;
8. technical assistance to the programs in areas of production of program'
related charts, graphics development, film projection and photographic
services;
9. coordination of work flow in areas relating to the Government 'renting
g
EPA Form 2410.10 (8.78)
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT (R577) (CONTINUATION)
10. property/supply management services including shipping,
receiving and warehousing;
11. capabilities for printing, duplicating for rapid, high-volume
service;
12. motor vehicle and transportation services;
13. Agency-wide word processing services with respect to purchasing
of equipment, instruction and workflow;
14. responsibility for facilities (including Operations Offices,
laboratories, etc.);
15. space management;
16. overall communications services;
17. mail delivery; and
18. magnafax services.
Alternatives include contracting of some services such as library
services or certain ADP services such as keypunching. Regions which
did not add mini-computers in FY'78 may add them in FY'79.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM Z: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE ANO CODE RG MEDIM PGJ* IS
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT *»**^ Jlll.l.
'SUMMAR"™™7a"IcTFY 79*C. E. FY P0 INCR FY 80
POSITIONS PFT ' 169.0 U5.0 133,0 133,0
LEVEL ' OPpT 40.0 «6.0 38,0 38,0
01 0? oo "TE 232.b 203.2 203.2
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 3,187.0 3,355.9 2,9t3.b 2,913 6
UtSUHIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Funding at this level provides for basic, mandatory services. Priorities
are established for performance of many services and there will be delays
in meeting program needs.
Small Purchase Procurement: Provides for only mandatory and emergenc
purchase requests. Priorities will be established with lower level
priority requests requiring longer lead time for processing. Region I
would provide normal procurement management.
Contracts: Minimal contract assistance.
Property: Most regions would' conduct at least an annual property
inventory (Region 7 would not). However, reporting requirements would be
delayed and effective use of excess property reduced.
t
Supplies: Requisitions filled weekly. Essential items stocked. No
deliveries.
Facilities: Only building operations and repairs involving safety
hazards handled as needed. Work authorizations for alterations and up-
grading of space handled on limited basis. Space utilization studies
deferred.
Telecommunications: Service orders will be processed for mandatory
equipment only. Surveys will be delayed. Limited technical assistance
and training conducted where cost savings result. Region 7 will not
review monthly toll charges and will issue no telephone directory.
Printing and Reproduction: Delays and limitations experienced. Some
use of outside contracts (Region 10). Region 7 will use GSA Print Shop
for provision of all services.
Records and Paperwork Management: Most regions will process records
to the Federal Records Center annually, and will defer annual records
review. (Region 10 will complete the annual review and process records
to TR.C as needed). Other services such as issuance of directives and
forms control will be limited (Region 7 will have no directives program) .
Mail: For most regions pick-up and delivery will be limited to once a
day with one pick-up point in each division. Assistance of operating divi-
sion personnel will be required for any special or mass mailings. Mandatorp
reporting will be accomplished. Regions 6 and 7 will provide no inter-
office delivery or pick-ups. Region 5 will have one day delay on delivery
and provide no pick-up. Region 1 will provide full mail service with two
pick-ups and deliveries.
207
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT (R577) Continuation
Occupational Safety and Health: Mandatory program functions will be
accomplished. Review of Accident Reports delayed. Abatement of hazardous
conditions expedited. No analysis of data or identification of trends that
affect accident frequency and costs will be accomplished. Annual inspec-
tions (semi-annually in Region 7).
Security: Mandatory security requirements will be accomplished.
Employee ID cards and credentials will be issued as required.
Motor Vehicle Management: Motor vehicle licenses issued. Reporting
requirements met. Most regions will issue guidelines to drivers concern-
ing energy conservation effort. Region 5 would require the programs to
make reservations directly with GSA for government vehicles.
Library Services: Some regions would continue library services
(Regions 3, 4, 9). Others would limit services to internal regional use
orJLy, and not provide for public or other agency use (Regions 5, 8).
Finally, others would either contract out library services (Region 10) or
provide no services (Region 7).
Information Systems Development and- Maintenance: Most regions will
provide ADP support critical to EPA Data Processing System only.' Region 2
will establish a cost-effective ADP service within the regional office
including the implementation of the PDF 11/70 mini-computer.
Management of Word Processing Systems: At a minimum level handling
only priority requests from operating programs. Surveys will not be per-
formed at this level (no word processing in Region 7).
Graphics: There would be minimal graphics support at this level by
mcst regions.
Benefits
This level of funding provides for the minimum mandatory level of
administrative services.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding at this level would increase workloads within programs to
provide needed services. Certain services, such as graphics, would
probably be totally eliminated in many regions. More regions would reduce
or eliminate library services. Other services would have to be provided
directly by Headquarters or contracted out causing increased delays. There
would be a lack of coordination of supplies and maintenance; lack of con-
trol over personal property; minimal implementation of safery requirements.
Mandatory requirements of facilities management, forms management, and
records management would be greatly impaired.
2U8
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG M£DIA"™"*!"'""*'"""*'
P-577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPRO I AGENCY i REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
•'. POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 06 FT£
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
I
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
- 169.0 165.0
uo.o a6to
232.6
3,187.0 3,355.9
FY 80 INCR
17,0
3.0
12.7
FY 80 CUM
150.0
41,0
215,9
3,349.5
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Funding at this level will allow performance of some optional functions
required to meet operating division program goals. Commercial services
will be reduced and minimum assistance from operating division personnel
will be required. Priorities will be established and support to lower
priority programs will be accomplished only after mandatory program goals
are met.
Most routine requisitions could now be met with a significant reduction in
processing time. ADP support expanded. Library support services expanded
in some regions (Region 7 still provides no library support). Records
documented and transferred to FRC more rapidly. Delivery of supply
requests in some regions with increased stock levels. Special delivery
and certified mail delivered to the Post Office once a day. Additional
contract guidance provided to operating personnel and less reliance on
Headquarters Contracts Management Division personnel. Region 6 will
reduce lead time for routine contracts from 240 to 180 days. Region 10
will implement emphasis in minority and small business activities.
However, Region 3 will be funded to a level which allows from full support
to the operating divisions to meet program goals. Requests for service
will be processed in normal turn-around time necessary to meet demand.
All mandatory and optional functions will be accomplished for Region 3.
Benefits
Benefits of funding at this level are an increased quality of service
including some optional functions, and less delays in service provided.
It would not provide for the library, graphics, or word processing in
Region 7.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding at this level could reduce administrative management to a
mandatory level of service. No new services, critical or otherwise,
would be supported.
209
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FQRH 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSTS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE RG MEDIAj PG M &S
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPRUj AGENCY & REG MGT
9 • V » W • • •* W W • • • • •• • •*• • •• • • • • •> • ** • •> • • • 9 • •• •• IV • • V • •• " W •* V ^ V Ik 9 M ^ • • IP •••••• 4V ^^^ ••
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY t«0 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT . 169.0 165.0 16,0 166.0
LEVEL OPFT «o,0 «6.0 5.0 tt6,0
03 OF Ob FTE 232.6 15.7 231.6
5UDGET AUTH. COOO.O) 3»187.0 3,355.9 353.6 3,703.1
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
This level generally provides for adequate support to operating programs
although there is significant variation between regions. In general
commercial services are minimized and little assistance from operating
programs is required. Special surveys for cost reduction and greater
efficiency are conducted for such things as space utilization, tele-
communications, printing and reproduction, and mail management. Delays
in provision of services are minimized. For example, mail pick-ups will
be increased, delays in receiving accident reports decreased, more fre-
quent processing of supply requests, etc. Other programs such as minority
procurement, occupational health and safety, and ADP services would
receive greater attention. Regions 6 and 9 would fully implement the
mini-computer and other regions (Regions 3 and 10) would develop new in-
house ADP systems. Region 7 would still provide no library, graphics or
word processing support, and other services would be limited.
Benefits
A generally adequate level of administrative support would be provided
to the regional programs.
Consequences of Not Funding
Not funding at this level would reduce the support to operating regional
programs, especially the provision of full ADP services, and would cause
delays in the provision of routine services such as procurement.
210
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
z
ts
^
z a
o «
t- r
•- i
U 2
C UJ
a u
a, z
-1 0
« 10
^ UJ
z e
i •—
Z "-
0 Z
Z 5
> Z
z c
UJ —
m —
>- u
« O
O9 —
C
uj x
•- z
** o
Z U.
z
UJ
x
UJ
a
z
r
w
IM
•—
<
C
V)
to*
to 2
? *••
e r
•• o
IS <
UJ
z »»
0211 Sg
9
«5
e>
£
—
o —
flS «C
* —
z
3
•—
2
u.
0 X
» UJ
» e
«— w
z
p~
o- u
O- z
— z
J
»» 5
» t-
"™ -c
4 tfi
pn O
•» 0
» -c
fa ni
« tn
in o
0- -C
IM f«l
•a in
f^ O
» •*
h «
ni IM
•e ir
•n o
•« A
0 -0
« «
IM IM
« « o in o o «vi
— a> IM « >n «n o
0- f~ — .0 — IM
» * »
rani ni
« -o o in o e <\i
IM IM IM
o- o- o a o e «
in -o - in -o ™
srr ~
o o o e o
p~f- ni » o
03 B pn « 9
"• "» • ""
1*1 p^ fu
^i«
o
O
O »»
•» 1- U. UJ
O < C Q. O U.
• UJ Z O ^* ^
u» Z ff? O ^
S *• 3 ^ <• ^
0 0 < ~ »
— -f r z z
e »- in o
N* Z X >• M*
^ UJ *•• UJ < ^
UJ, CS *"^ *^ ^ •••
>• 0 H- (0
u 3 30
_j ffi o a
in in
e- —
Q 0
PO 0
^ 1^
•n m
o>* -T
P" 0
in m
in in
w* -
•n o
% •
*> p^
in in
oT ,J
9 a
W 0
* «,
p** m
m in e in o e «•
9 ^ in v in 9 «•
fl — — C — IM
» » »
p^pn m
» » e e e 9 r>
in in c — p- «n IM
pn o tn o — —
o- w o a- o o -o
m -c » p- m « — G
0 •- 3 I •« -
3 O « •- «0
IM < r z z
e — - —
—1 UJ — U •« «-
UJ CS >^ ^^ ^ •«
> C P- «
IU ~ 3 O
_j c c a
— a
P**l <4
0 C
r- »
pn pn
— c
« <
S »
•n pn
— B
tn -o
f- w
^ ^
pn pn
«
»n «
e o
r-
r» in -• «r — ni
•» ^ «
pnpn tn
tnpn om -o m in
ui a — ~r. At f o
ec pn 4 9
Tt » *"
vt P^ fM
O
c
o »-
M •_ u. UJ
e < c o. o u.
•*u z o *- —
u. z c < ~ «
tn « x z Z
C •- €O C
*— Z X >• *-
«l UJ "^ UJ ^ *•
UJ O — — _l —
> £ 1-9!
UJ 3 3 C
_! CD CO.
-------
o
z
UJ
o
<
o
K
O
UJ
t-
O
c
a.
UJ £T
II
ii
> «
2 us
UJH
UJ
UJ
Z
g
?J
3
UJ
•-
H £
1«
• • O.'
< 0
.5?
LU a.
2 <
*
d
O uj
"X c
^
r^
T^
m
I
OS
^^
±j
c
0)
0)
oc
a
c
w
0)
>
— H
•J
C9
b
u
0)
•*-)
C
•rt
E
•c
<
*»^
UJ
a
o
u
a
z
<
LU
_J
^»
H
H
2
3
Z
O
vi
O
LU
a
<
(A
h-
LU
5
CO
J
a.
o
u
$
>
?
^
^
&
§
o>
>
U»
O5
-i
UJ
>
UJ
_!
_J
UJ
>
UJ
_J
1
1
_J
LU
>
LU
H
i
MM
UJ
UJ
-J
-1
^t
UJ
^*
UJ
_l
H
-j
UJ
>
UJ
_1
^
O) _•
- o
> E
LL CL
LU
CO <
!•» ~
01 5
>fc
LL LU
UJ
e
z>
M
<
UJ
5
c8
UJ
m j
^
H
Uv
Z
UJ
|
lo
U
&
O
U
u
<
m
.-oo«N.neo «*\e
esNCcTvOmoty-m m»H
CN CM m in tsi tn m
f- «H ^ -4 . -I
^^ *>H
\ocneo^cof^m«— ( >j3t^
fn^coeOi-tinocn <-HtN
in CM <• m PJ tN O
•m 9\ -H IH
iH
«
cNOr^r— r^r»ioo \Of^.
pntM'— ipn-^vossim men
O CM »O •
O «s es -^
CM •— 1
tMCTif»-r~.r*.r^m>5s \or^.
in ^H ••H f^ «^ vft f^g |^>i ff\ f^
m CM \o P>J «^ ro oo
^ CM CM -H
^H ^H
a
05 >, 0)
"O X -O 1 01 U
to a; a) w o > —
1 •" S > 05 h U >
o i-ivbnc.'osuui
U O — < 3 W 41 CO C 01
a.T3S,>CD;jfflc£i a:
o) 41 a) o < e a o>x
a to w L.XC v-icoo o) co c
4J ffl u O &U-H u C W O
t»0>^< (D K i-l U O -H3 -H
at uu bttiu m -o a b ua* w
3 o t. o)B.c: jj s N a, ego) a
u"fc.oi TSON OJCO-H y-o u
u 0.0. uhiH o) b ai -HCD •"
h o o a. -H 3 » o w e a
S)U «H O"WJ.: 0) 3tt) 3
o) u a. ai D j-i o) a) ^j < -3 Ew E
a u tn — 3 bu3!/:u £3 E
a a CD iBja b Eb £s Eb E03 Eb £33 S"3t"1'*'
30) S 30) 3O 30 3.C 30) 3.C 3OCT 3 b
ZUZ Zb ZU ZU Zu ZU ZU ZUU ZO
05
rv
CO
CN
o
^
«N
E
0
LU
^
CL
Ul
-------
CJ
2
tu
a
<
z
o
H
O
LU
I—
O
cr
>
z
213
LU
2
X
CO
O
U
z
3
Z
O
52
o
LU
Q
'CC
o
H 2
SC e
o <
Z
.. CL
< O
O QB
2 <
X
O LU
z cc
~s
10
1
ad
c
S
00
(8
a
S
0)
5
a
u
u
0)
c
•H
•5
-_
LU
O
0
u
Q
Z
•*•»
m
•4
t
2
3
CISIONI
LU
Q
<
01
K
LU
Z
CO
a.
S
O
u
LU
_J
3
s
o
03
en
^
LL.
en
LU
LU
LU
LU
_J
LU
^
LU
H
LU
^
LU
LU
^
LU
j
LU
^
LU
en _,•
>g
a. a.
LU
H-
« <
^
O) &
*~ ^
X V5
LU LU
LU
C
3
VI
LU
1
cfl
LU
^i
^
L_
.
Z
LU
§
Crt
COMPLI
0
a
s s
^J ^Q
«s in
o «
r~ «M
r> O
"* ^ .
u
U \
s c
C. 3
i* O
3
cr to
S U
3
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE) HQ 0PM MEDIA:
Administrative Management (577) R£G APPRO:
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
To be responsive to program needs in area of administrative services
including:
- ADP systems design and services
- Management studies and organisational analyses
- Security of proprietary and classified information and
investigation of illegal conduct of employees, contractors,
or grantees
- Industrial hygiene and safety programs to assure a safe
and healthful work environment
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Initiated and provided .increased emphasis on an employee medical mon- .
itoring program; conducted 12 industrial hygiene surveys; safety
inspected 402 of Agency worksites; conducted 30 management analysis
studies; issued 140 Agency directives; designed 500 forms; conducted
72 internal and 40 Construction Grant investigations; initiated work
on the 1981-1990 ADP Acquisition Strategy; provided 57,620 library
services to EPA staff and the public; processed 377 U.K. International
Referral System inquiries including issuing publications and conducting
briefings.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Provide industrial hygiene, medical monitoring, training, and safety
inspection programs; ADP services including the continuation and
development of the 1981-1990 Acquisition Strategy and support for
new programs such as Toxics; organizational/management analyses;
library services; internal and external security/investigative
activities to include support for the Construction Grants and Toxic
Substances Programs; management and direction of the Office of
Administration including RTP, N.C., and Cine., Oh. Those services/
activities that could conceivably be done by the program offices
themselves would not result in position or dollar savings; decentraliza-
tion would have the opposite effect due to duplication of effort and
lack of consistency in policy and operations. The Agency is constantly
reviewing its services for suitable contracting out mechanisms. All
possible alternatives have been analyzed and implemented. Various EO's,
laws, etc., preclude the contracting of the majority of services. The
few possible services chat could be contracted would not result in
financial savings to the Agency and would increase turnaround time for
these services.
EPA Ft.™ 2*10.10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEOJAj PG M JS
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPRO| AGENCY & REG
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 JNCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 156,0 156.0 H9.0 119,0
LEVEL OPFT ' 16.0 22.0 16.0 16.0'
01 OF 08 FTE 187,4 160.3 160.3
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 4,.934.0 6,076.8 «,15i,6 «,151.6
215
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEOUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Health and Safety - Evaluation of medical monitoring data for 102 of
laboratory employees; safety inspections at 50% of EPA worksites; respond
to 50% of industrial hygiene surveys.
I. 0., DAA for Administration - overall planning and direction of the
Office of Administration (OA).
Information and Data Systems - Conduct feasibility studies and
evaluations; provide technical advice on new systems to only headquarters;
initiate and review only headquarters procurements; management of the
Washington and HTP Computer Centers and ADP design/developmental contracts;
development of system design reviews and 1981-1990 Acquisition strategy.
Management and Organization - Development, review, and analysis .of
organizational proposals; 8 management analysis studies (25% current level);
word processing services and studies; records and directives management;
limited advisory committee services (50% current level); library services
to existing programs only including microforming and translations;
monitoring of library contracts and interagency agreements.
Security and Inspection - Reduce headquarters security and emergency
response capability; investigate only Construction Grants complaints; no
re'gional services or security clearances.
OA - Cine. - Management and direction of OA - Cine.; provide ADP focal
point for standard laboratory automation and regional minicomputer systems;
ADP support for agencywide systems; limited operation of the National
Technical Information Library.
OA - RTP - Management and direction of OA-RTP; reduced word processing
services; limited library services to OAQPS and ORD laboratories.
Impact
Funding this level would provide extremely limited health/safety and
administrative services. It would be necessary to eliminate: 50% of on-
going health and safety activities; all laboratory and regional ADP support;
75% of management analysis studies; all inhouse forms services; the Library
Interagency Liaison Group Information Exchange Program (IRLG); regional and
headquarters inspection and investigative activities.
Not funding this level would require program offices to provide their own
services; this would not result in financial or position savings for the
Agency, due to the duplication and overlap in activities that would occur.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2l DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
HC
I PG M &3
ARPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 06 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, COOO.O)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E.
156.0 156.0
16.0 ?2,0
187.a
4*934.0 6,076.8
FY 80
20.0
4,0
15.7
670.6
FY 80 CUH
139.0
20.0
176.0
4,822.2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVfTIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Health and Safety - Evaluation of medical monitoring data for 40% of
laboratory employees; coordinate the development of Zero-Contact procedures;
develop procedures for pre-employment physical examinations.
I.O., DAA for Administration - Monitoring and control of management funds.
Information and Data Systems - Management of the ADP timesharing fund, a
coordination of OMB budgetary requirements; environmental site engineering
for the new ADP facility at RTP; preparation of RFP's, technical evaluation
plans, and hardware/software benchmarks for the 1981-1990 Acquisition.
Management and Organization - 15 management analysis studies (50% current
level); increased forms program but rely on contractors for 50% of workload;
library public access and processing functions; minimal participation in
library IRLG activities.
Security and Inspection - Slight increase in headquarters activities only.
OA - Cine. - Provide ADP operations support to EPA - Cine., and regional
minicomputer users.
OA - RT? - Provide Management analysis/counseling services.
Impact
Funding this level would provide the limited health/safety and administra-
tive services described above with many current activities partially or
entirely eliminated. At this level it would be necessary to eliminate; 30%
of current health and safety activities; majority of laboratory and regional
ADP support; 50% of current management analysis studies; 50% of inhouse forms
activities; majority of regional and headquarters inspection and investigative
activities.
Not funding this level would mean noncompliance with various Executive
Orders, laws, regulations, and GSA and OMB mandated requirements.
216
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
*ORM 2: DECISION' UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ M£DI A^'P^'H'!!"**"""'"""
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPROt AGENCY & REG MGT
3, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY ao
POSITIONS PFT . I56.o 156.0 17.0
LEVEL OPFT 16.0 22.0 3.Q
°3 OF 08 FTE 187.4 13.6 188.8
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 4,934,0 6,076,8 695.5 5,517,7
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING:
Activities
Health and Safety - Evaluating of medical monitoring data for 52% of
laboratory employees; review and revise training programs; complete lab
utilization guidelines; industrial hygiene surveys at all labs; review EPA
transport of hazardous materials in GSA vehicles.
I.O., DAA for Administration - Monitor management objectives; evaluate
and monitor productivity measurements and coordinate services with field
activities.
Information and Data Systems - Procurement of the central computing
service for the Agency for 1981-1990 time span including planning conversion,
writing procurement documents, and evaluating first stage proposals; agency-
wide support and technical assistance; administrative/technical direction
for the National ADP Institute (training). Current ADP systems development
will be cut back to make way for the 1981-1990 acquisition period.
Management and Organization - Conduct 30 management analysis studies in-
house (two manyears of effort currently devoted to headquarters management
analysis activities would be shifted to regional efforts); full forms and
advisory committee services.
Security and Inspection - Security clearances.
OA - Cine. - ADP support to headquarters library; full Cine, library
activities.
Impact
Funding this level would provide for those services and activities listed
above plus those described in Levels 1 and 2. Not funding this level would
mean noncompliance with some Executive Orders, laws, regulations, and GSA and
OMB mandated requirements.
217
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2j DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPRD.J AGENCY I REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT Fy 79EFYa<
POSITIONS PFT 156.0 ,156.0 2.0 158,0
LEVEL OPFT ' 16.0 22.0 23!fl
oa OF OS PTE 187. 4 2.0 190 8
BUDGET AUTH. (000.03 4,934.0 6,076.8 98.0 5,615 7
DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Security and Inspection (2) - implement procedures for the security of
proprietary Toxics and Pesticides information. This includes the safe-
guarding of confidential business and/or classified information since the
Toxic Substances Control Act provides for penalties for the unauthorized
disclosure of confidential business information.
Impact.
Funding this level would provide for the implementation of security
activities to serve the needs of the Toxics Chemicals and Pesticides
Programs. Not funding this level would jeopardize the installment of
security efforts to safeguard confidential business information.^
218
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2» DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
940 W ••• • <• W ••••••••• W MM W • • • M^MMA MMM4 M M^» A^»M Atf^B •• M^ M^^ ^^fcM ^* ^B^ ^ ^^B^^ ^
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO M£D1A| PG M is
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPROi AGENCY & REG MGT
^•W W •^'••^•^•^^••••^••^••V W^BW^ V V ^V V^'^b^ •• ^^^k^^^^^^^^^V^^^^^ ^^ ^ ^^^K ^^ ^^^ ^B^
8. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCH FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 156,0 156.0 5.0 163.0
LEVEL OPFT 16.0 22.0 23,0
05 OF 08 FTE 187.a 5.0 195,8
BUDGET AUTH. (000.03 4,934.0 6.076.8 205,0 5,860.7
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Activities
Information and Data Systems (2) - support of data security and
system design efforts for new systems, primarily in the Toxic Chemicals
Program. Security and Inspection '(3) - Regional inspections and
investigations. Provide capability in several regions to monitor
and investigate contracts and construction grants for possible fraud
or illegal conduct of awardees.
Impact
Funding this level would provide for the increased services and activities
described above. Not funding this level would eliminate ADP security
and design efforts for the Toxics Program and the capability for
regional inspections and investigations.
219
EPA Form 2410-1' (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE MQ MEUIA| PQ M is
R577 ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT APPROj AGENCY & REG MGT
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
07 OF 08 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (-000,0)
FY 78 ACT
156,0
16.0
-------
z
IS
^
^
z e
o «
>- s
U 3
U z
Z O
IU «~
B5
05 M
U U
^ UJ
•* o
m —
d
*" £
z ul
•»
z
UJ
•- s
Z UJ
IU (2
r <
u z
< s
« UJ
^ >
•M
^ •—
C9 IT
Z i-
— 09
Z —
z z
< *•
_l X
0. 0
«
^ 1^
r.
0^ 1 -o m
i . 1 -«
a
B
»
B
— o>
T
Ml
*»
IU
m <9
B Z
— Z
Z
•J
o.
•**
B
yi
^
IU
e i-
o- _<
— 3
=
u
H.
z
e z
B UJ
c- a.
z
*
C- uj
r.
» Z
— a
» ^
^
•o in
— »
m —
x B
a m
•« m
— o-
— B
a m
•A m
* •
*• ^
m •-
— B
. .
a M
o in
— • »*
m —
— B
. .
a >•«
^ -c e m o e m
— B m B — —
. . .
am tn
< < e m e o «
— i%* ff- ^ ^ ^ e
•- B 01 a » —
» • «
B "^ m ». a e a
J> 4 e e « e
a e a » < j>
» B — m —
. . .
a a a
-^*
o
o
O X-
B w» J ^. u. O. »•"
e * e a. o u.
-. I c, t~ tn
UJ 3 3 O
_I S CO.
«i •« r. -a m -c
B a mo « «-
a a mm mm
m m r. a ^ -o
«\j «* r- .a m -a
m « F- •« m •o
m m *• f^ •* ^
B a me -a —
. . . . . .
a a mm mm
mm»>moee p-mmaooooB o e e m e o
or.rur.eam m e a o- f. m m B B e o m m
^ 10 ^ AJ ^ 9" O IO f^ *• *• fr O ^ ^
Bmm*.eoa Bmm».eea B m m >. e e a
^•coo-»>o
_t UJ — UJ < •- _JIU—UJ«>— _l U.1 — U < >-
UJU*^^^*. IU19^'^_J'*« "' '^ ^^ ^^ _* "^
>e i*5 >Q x «j >o ^ec
_JO CO. -J S CO. -J D
p^ — * ^ m
o ^ ^ 1/1 —
» •> «
""
e o o r* e
a o a » -o
o « — in —
. . .
a a a
„,
0
^
o
B ~ J -. IZ
e < o o.
u. x c? 3 e ^
o -3 r w4
3 C < -•
e ^ 09 S
_J UJ — UJ •< ~
n t f«i ^^ .* 1 ••
> o •— n
_i 0 O OL
CO
-------
z e
o <
U =!
tu r
z c
u ••
n
1/3 MM
VL> u
^ u
«« e
«9 —
U. I
— • oc
2 *.
tU
>- s:
z w
r >
a s.
z >~
— £
0. C
•d » jn «v
< » «n —
m in
e a.
ec
o
e —
m »- k. >u
e — _) —u. OL «-
e < o n. o u.
• u; ft O ^ ^
^ Z 0? C^ O
=> <- 3 r •» -
=• o < •-•>
o "* >- « e
UJ L9 —• •
> C
>- 05
5 O
c n.
or. 2
-------
UJ
a
<
o
H
U
UJ
t-
O
CC
> *
2 to
UJ
z
D
CC
o
*•• s
no 3
2u ^5
^
< o
ii
0-
o
C3
O uj
— CC
^
fx
£
JJ
(U
0)
eo
ea
e
z
a)
>
^
CS
£
CO
— 1
e
*H
•o
^
UJ
Q
O
U
a
z
<
LU
-J
fr—
?-
z
3
ECISION
Q
<
CO
Z
UJ
•T"
to
Q.
s
o
o
Q
<
.J
v
g
O
CO
O)
1"
^
,,
J
UJ
>
UJ
J
J
UJ
UJ
^
_J
UJ
^
UJ
1
UJ
UJ
H
I
J
UJ
UJ
J
I
UJ
>
UJ
-1
en
2 ->'
~ o
> cc
u. a.
UJ
H
f? ^
9) 2
]~ K
U. LU
UJ
CC
3
in
<
LU
5
in
<= ^ 2 ° 2 ° °
GO i-^ en -^ o CM
-* in \o
r-T
m
O -H m m o o o
m ^ ^i in m
i— 1 CM v£
M
cn
in
O »-t CO O O O O
in o*» o
o
px »
-T
O -«• O O O O r*.
•«• 1-1 en > SST 09 T34) 4IMO3
0) .^^ ^ 3-x. a-3 C^"^"!
«-| Meg eg ca-o OC wSJO
os x iH -H ij ca i— i OIK* ->>-aQ
*J ^ *™^ 4) ^ C w aj -^
**"^ M W 73 S T3 "1 OS >>. 31 >» •— cn u^
tnSJJO) 4IOIU U UQ3J4)
-^t» ta-u ao-u y cn eo< cowu-n
M 3y njy cu s u^ w^yu
O7373S cs i- u .aa ^soio^
«-i 0 ~O 4Ju'~'ss""c
OT? u-iy&u^u LU ib lu — 04 nee
*JiJ coT co 2"4)^ *3 ^ »
0)4) 4)4)0 01-H i) 4)a 01 — a. 4i3-^"S
yc. ^>^M ^2-3 ja ja2 j> j -n 3 3
Uffl Stji— i S3 S S"3 SOOI EA-iC"cn
^** *• 3 — • w ^3 *• «< 3 ^^ 3 W i^ 3 EQ CI CO
••I *?^ 2S 03 l*^ ^Z S3 ^2 2j ^^ r^ *"* |_j
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
ADP Timeshare R586
HQ X
REG.
MEDIA:
APPRO: MULTI
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
To assure that computing services are available to all Agency entities
so that Agency goals and missions can be pursued•efficiently and
effectively; and to provide such services in a cost-effective manner.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLJSHMENTS
Provided computing services to all agency entities through 2 major
agency data centers, commercial-suppliers, and other federal agency
resources.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Continue computing service arrangements provided by the 2 major data
centers (Washington Computer Center and National Computer Center, RTF)
and other suppliers of computing resources. Expand current computing
resources to keep pace with program growth and provide data processing
capacity to support requirements of new legislation and new program
initiatives. •
EPA Form 2410.10 (8-73)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2t DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG « 43
RS86 AOP TIMESHAtfE APPRO
8, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCP FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 10,550.0 17,689.6 13,270,0 13,270,0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Provides a TtH-n-tmmn acceptable level of ADP timesharing support for operation
of the 2 major agency Data Centers:
a. Washington Computer Center (WCC) - an ISM 360/168 system located in a
commercial facility operated by Computer Network Corporation (COMNET)
under a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract awarded 12/76 for a 4-year
period.
b. National Computer Center (NCC) - a UNI7AC-1110 system which is.EPA-owned
and located In EPA's leased facility in Research Triangle Park, NC. The
NCC is operated by a facilities management contractor, Integrated Ser-
vices, Inc. (ISI) under a CPAF contract awarded 9/77 for a 5-year period.
This level allows EPA to aeet legislative and statutory requirements and re-
spond to requirements of Congress, OMB, and EPA top management. Provides for:
o Biweekly backup and updates for water quality monitoring data
o Quarterly USGS water quality updates
o Critical mass for air quality (AQ) monitoring data system to ascertain
progress in achieving AQ standards
o Permits Compliance System (PCS) covers only major industrial permits
o Weekly processing and demand reporting for the Financial Management
System (FMS)
o Monthly updating and high priority reports for the Grants Information and
Control System (GIGS)
o Research data processing for ORD
o Data processing support to satisfy basic requirements of the Safe Drinking
Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Toxic Substances
Control Act
o Data Files to support pesticide registration, reregistration, and intra-
state registration
Benefits of Funding:
o Provides basic ADP support to Agency entities to allow EPA to meet legis-
lative and statutory requirements, and respond to requirements of the
Congress, OMB, and EPA top management.
Failure to fund this level would result in suspending operation at both Data
Centers. Programs would be obliged to resort to manual processing of data,
which is infeasible, and/or obtain timesharing services from assorted indivi-
dual outside sources. This would not be cost effective, and it would not
provide controls over timesharing and ADP related services and expenditures.
225
EPA Form 2410.1! (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL DRQTECT!ON AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE MQ «EDJAj PG M is
R586 4DP TIMESHARE APPRO| MDLTI
•••••••••••••••«••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••• •••••>••••••»*••••«• •••«£>
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCH FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 05 FTE '
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 10,550,0 17,689.6 2,650.0 15,920.0.
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Increases ability to perform strategy, planning, and assessment analysis.
Data is sufficiently current and accurate to meet user needs and support
EPA objectives in a cost-effective-manner.
Provides for:
o Ambient pollutant analysis for toxics strategy
o Weekly backup and update of water quality data
o Monthly update of USGS water quality data
o Ambient pollutant analysis and validation of air quality data
o Increased ORD support for water quality analysis, quality%assurance,
modeling, and project management system
o Improved turnaround and flexibility on report cycling for enforcement
system
o Adding publicly owned grant eligible applications to PCS (Permits
Compliance System)
o Agency wide demand reporting for FMS (Financial Management System)
o GICS (Grants System) adds special reports to Congress, OMB, and EPA
management
o Regional modeling programs
Benefits of funding:
>,!•
o Increases file updating frequency, but not to current levels
o Provides systems enhancements
*
Failure to fund this level would result in agency effectiveness being
seriously hampered due to dininished data information handling capabilities.
226
EPA Form 2410-J1 (3-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAj PG « iS
R586 AOP TIMESHARE APPRO J
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 05 FTE
SUDGST AUTH, (000.0) 10,550.0 17,669.6 1,770.0 17,690.0-
C DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
EPA's ADP systems are improved and expanded, and better use of. existing
data is realized.
Provides for:
o Data processing requirements to support approved program plans for
research and development
o Cost accountability mechanisms for Regions and States
o Mass.transfer of USGS data
o Screening air quality data using automated statistical techniques
o Maintaining source inventory and information management sysfteo for all
major applications in PCS (Permits Compliance System)
o Automated Did (Discharge Monitoring Report) violation detection
o Automated records of completed contracts under CIS (Contracts Information
System)
o Tracking of federal agency pollution abatement projects .
Benefits of funding:
o Increases ability to perform strategy planning and assessment analysis
o Current and accurate data aeets user needs to support EPA objectives in
a' cost-effective manner
o Court ordered deadlines are met in support of enforcement actions
Failure to fund this level would result in inability to meet management
requirements for current and accurate data to support EPA objectives in a
cost-effective manner.
227
EPA rerni 2410-11 (S-7S)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASENC*
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT L£V£L ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE " ™"""**WEDI A
R586 ADP TIMESHARE
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.'E. F Ys
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
o<* OF os FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 10,550.0 17,689.6 Z, 660.0 20,350.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
o ADP support of increased responsibilities due co the Clean Water Act
Amendment, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the NRDC Consent Decree
o Automation of complete industry profiles
o Operation of system for estimating amissions of noncritical pollutants
o Water supply modeling for OKD
o Increased on-line edit and update capability
o High priority enhancements for regional systems
o Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) processing increases from biweekly
to weekly •
o Basic support for the Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group (IELG)
Common Codes project
o Basic support for Data Standardization project
Benefits of funding;
o Increased program effectiveness by improving timeliness of reporting
o Better use of existing data is realized
o ADP systems are improved and expanded
o Increased responsibilities under new legislation are supported
', !-
Failure to fund this level will result in providing less ADP services then
the programs have estimated to be required in support of approved programs.
228
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 21 DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
^^H* W^H^^ A A 4B ^B ^k W iV^W • V4WI^PM4fe4fc •• A 4fe • M M M M^ M» ^M ^ ^ ^^
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE ANQ CODE HQ ""
R586 ADP TIMESHARE APPRO, MOLTI
8,
LEVEL OPFT
os OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 10,550.0 17,689.6 1,450,0 21,80Q
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Allows »nj"ri-tmaa efficiency and productivi-ty to EPA's systems
o Implenentation and oaintenance of 4 distinct, aajor, national computer
systeas in support of public water supplies program and groundwater
protection program
o Data processing requirements to support enhanced toxic- chemical health
resource initiative of Office of Research and Development (ORD) and the
Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group (ISLG)
Benefits of funding:
o Research capabilities are enhanced
«
o Implements and maintains the 2 ADP systems. Model State Information
System (MSIS) and Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS)J to monitor
public water supplies, and 2 ADP systems being developed to monitor
protection of groundwater supplies
Failure to fund ac this level will prohibit expansion of data processing
functions in support of Safe Drinking Water and health research initiatives
229
EPA Farm 2410-1 1 (8-78)
-------
t
1
r
^
UJ
W
Hf_
>.
z a:
» X
O U
c w
a. a
^
-j a
JticV
tr
»-
-
~ S
> z
z o
Uj mm
CO
m —
u. u
« c.
CO —
•r\
u. S.
"• 2
Z U.
_
UJ
£
IS
£ UJ
t
•» <
z
CS (A
~ UJ
«• £
Z *™
z —
<
Ifc. -10.
^ 0. O '
• <
• t
W "• •"
~ s.
c tn
— a:
•9
J^
w*
CO
e- *+
— CO
—
<
z
•••
CO
••
9 ^
K <
r> -J
•w Z
z
a
u
_
z
UJ
e r
e uj
e- a.
mm 5_J
• 2
mm
Ifi
9 UJ
PH.
0 C
~" 5
u
—
f- S
9 •"•
— U
e in
9 (U
r~ in
rv r
<* e^
o m
9 rv
>- m
rv r>
m c^
^
9 m
9 ru
*^ m
ru o
» *
*•* c>
—
9 m
• •
9 rv
»• in
rv c>
« %
•^ o
"
9 9 in
• » •
9 9 rv
r* r^ in
ru rv e-
» » »
ft pt r>
^ ••
9 o in
• • •
9 9 ru
t». fta. m
ru ru «>
» » ^
^ r*» o
«• —
^ * Hi
• • •
t> t> r*>
X SO «
« X ru
» » »
•• ^ —
9 9m
S 9 -
9
e
9 —
«* •• U. UJ
in «» _i~ u. a. -~
9 < 9 O. C U,
• u e 9 ~- —
u. Z « = 9
3 — 2 r <•« —
= O 1 — CB
— « z E r
9 «- BJ C
mv Z X ^ ••*
—J yj ^ UJ * *•
jj .j — ^ _l —
uj z z c
-J C CO.
9
0
ru
*
tft
9
9
ru
•>
in
*"
e
9
rv
o
*
in
—
9
•
9
rv
c>
»
in
"
e
•
0
ni
Qk
c^
*T>
<«
*
^
O
e
«/*
^
o
e
O1
s
m
tn ^
c
» UJ
u. r tn
0^3
** * 3C
C"
••* Z
«r! UJ •*
UJ U "^ '
> £.
UJ Z
_! C
9
«
9
rv
o
»
in
mm
O
•
9
in
-jj
«
ru
iA
•
r>
CD
X
^
•"
0
9
in
tn
£
_j
X
2
r
e
^
X
UJ
HB«
9
9
cr
«>
«.
9
9
9
«*
mm
™*
e
9
W
o
«
••
••
9
•
9
a-
mp.
«
mm
"
e
9
O
9
0
^
•*•
«!•
in
•
f*,,
s
0*
•t
<••
IM
*
r>»
£
•X
p-T
^
in
ru
^
r>
"
mm
— U. UJ
— u. a. >-
9 0. C U.
9 «^ ^'
9
«> ••
^ IA
z
CO C
^ ••
ml •—
— 1 —
•- W
r c
e o.
e in
e •»
c^ ^
« rv
^T ^
^ *"*
o in
O f*
tj* ^>
M
CCIW CM* CBC*
e em
• * •
O Of-
f*- •*—• nj
f— *^. »^
« •» *
•• CM* *r»
<
9 9 rv
in in —
*> inr>
9 9t~
,
9
9
9 —
0% *^ ^ UJ
in »» _<<-• u. o. —
9 « 9 0. O U.
• UJ S 9 •— w
U. Z CO Z 9
s — D r •» —
S C •* «- CO
•> < Z X Z
C *• CO C
m. Z X >-*•
mm UJ ^ UJ mt *•
^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^ »M
> a — co
uj Z = O
-j e co.
9
9
in
•*
e
rv
9
e
in
•^
9
"*
e
9
in
«
9
ru
9
•
9
in
mt
^
9
ru
e
•
9
in
•n
^
9
ru
9
•
9
•C
•C
^
ru
m}
v
Q.
CC
•
—
e
9
in
in
9
9
e
9
M
in —
c
• UJ
U. Z CO
S — 3
5 C
ar < Z
9
«- Z
— i UJ —
Mj O *^
> £
U Z
in
S1"
m*
"• U. U.
J •• u. a. —
mt 9 0. C U.
z e — —
Z 9
S «• -
c z
>- CO O
M ^ mm
mm mf mm
— -1 -m
— o
C 0.
e
o
9
mi
mm
rv
9
9
9
D
„.
rv
o
e
e
0
«
—
rw
9
•
9
9
f}
»
mm
ru
9
•
9
9
CO
^
| —
rv
9
•
S
in
e-
%
—
•c
«
^
e
•
••
9
9
in
in
9
9
9
9
09
in —
9
•
u. I
*
'- *
N»
-J UJ
^ '_**
> Z
UJ 3
mmS.
e
9
in
^
~
9
9
m
"<
£
^
e
9
in
*
^
«•
9
•
9
in
•*
«
«
"
9 9
• •
9 9
9 in
w ^
— J£
rv —
9 in
• •
9 fw
in CB
? 9
* »
•• ••
« rv
• «
o r«
CC -C
•c ru
• •
•• •"
_o in
e ru
in m.
in e>
9 •>
*m
_J — U.
< 9 0.
in z e
a x « •
o < — co
Z SI Z
•- in c
Z X >- —
•M kW < ^
^^ ^ ^ ^
•- CO
3 =
C 0.
1
1
9
-------
SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS
CONTENTS
PAGE
A. MEDIA RESOURCE SUMMARY 231
B. MEDIA OVERVIEW 232
C. MEDIA RANKING 234
D. BUDGET REQUEST BY DECISION UNIT 235
-E. DECISION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS AND
LEVELS 237
-------
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FY 1980 OMB REQUEST
Scientific Activities Overseas
Media Resource Summary
FY 1979 FY 1980 Change
(dollars in thousands)
Scientific Activities
Overseas
Budget Authority 4,000.0 5,000.0 +1,000.0
0231
-------
SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS
I. OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY
Scientific Activities Overseas (SAO) are funded from excess
foreign currencies accruing to the United States under various
programs. These activities serve as a link between EPA and foreign
environmental agencies and institutions that have mutual interests
in seeking solutions to environmental problems, and enable EPA to
capitalize on unique research opportunities without contributing
to a balance of payments deficit or to domestic inflation. The SAO
program supports the Agency's international goals: (1) to assist
in the achievement of domestic program goals by carrying on pro-
grams through which EPA scientists collaborate with colleagues in
foreign countries, acquiring technology developed abroad and
sharing in the research and program management experiences of other
countries; (2) to fulfill national obligations created by inter-
national agreements; and (3) • to enhance the worldwide understand-
ing of the environment.
Currently there are 45 cooperative research projects being
carried out in Egypt, Pakistan, and India. These projects encom-
pass practically all environmental concerns—air, water, solid
waste, radiation, toxics, and pesticides, and involve all phases of
environmental research activities—identification of pollutants and
the development of an effective data base, the impact assessment of
pollutants on human health and the environment, the development of
control technologies, and implementation of systems and procedures
for monitoring ambient conditions.
The SAO review procedure for approving projects closely paral-
lels the procedures for domestic programs. Official proposals are
initiated by institutions in participating SAO countries after
informal communications have identified mutual research interests.
Scientific evaluations are made of each proposal by appropriate EPA
scientists and engineers to determine their relevancy to domestic
programs. University and industrial consultants frequently are
requested to provide technical comments on the proposals. Official
approval is made with the concurrence of the responsible EPA
program element, the EPA Office of International Activities, and
the Department of State.
In addition to the direct research benefits to EPA from SAO,
this program also stimulates environmental protection activities in
participating countries. Without exception, countries active
within the SAO program have significantly enhanced mechanisms to
deal with environmental problems.
0232
-------
Further, the SAO programs are recognized in the United States
and in all participating countries as visible evidence of U.S.
efforts to engage in peaceful endeavors directed toward the develop-
ment of knowledge and technological advancement specific to our
global environment.
II. REQUEST SUMMARY
FY 1980 Total Change from FY 1979
PFT BA$(000) PFT BA$(000)
Scientific Activities
Overseas - 5,000 - +1,000
The Scientific Activities Overseas Program will increase
efforts in funding additional projects and developing technology
workshops in the participating countries, particularly in the
areas of disposal of hazardous wastes and toxic substances.
The program is intended to implement cooperative research of
mutual interest to EPA and the participating SAO countries: Egypt,
India, and Pakistan. The SAO program is designed to: (1) augment
EPA's multimedia data base, (2) assist in the solution of environ-
mental problems by merging the expertise of U.S. and foreign in-
vestigators, (3) extend new technology into a broader world com-
munity, (4) assist in meeting EPA international agreements, and (5)
develop and/or demonstrate new technologies including sampling,
modelling and control strategies. Some of the specific projects
include: Determination of potential hazards to human health of
certain toxic substances; studies of the management and disposal of
hazardous industrial and municipal waste discharges; analysis,
assessment and control methodology for toxic discharges from
fertilizer, coke oven and basic organic chemical industries, en-
vironmental effects of persistence and degradation of pesticides
and toxic residue; and studies of fugitive and stack emmission
impact on air quality.
0233
-------
a:
a.
r r z
JJ X <
r a:
Z
05
o o c
o o o
coo
3 O O
O » O
COO
»3 to co >-
Z X 1 u.
-J LJ _!
co vj
r z s
•n -i '.o
—. (X1 -O
COS
o o o
-------
o:
o
o
z
UJ
z
o >-
o z> o
Qt O *~*
tr «—
_J u
« »- Ul
»- UJ O
Z (9
uj o >-
z => m
z CD
O I-
EE CC CO
« Z UJ
>• O S
Z C
uj o *• <
« >• IS
I- U. O
UJ O*
v O *^ ft—
i x i a
• tr o t-
o cc >.
z o- uj
3
O
•••
o
a.
CL
a.
02.:
-------
cc
x
o:
o
u_
>-
u
2
is
•z.
O t-
»- 2
(_> t- r;
UJ to
e- uj z
o r> c
tr e »
O- UJ «0
tr «-
_) o
t- uj o
z e
u o >•
Z 3 CD
Z 1C
0 t-
sr tr CD
«-• X UJ
> 0 =>
Z 0
UJ C UJ
it tr
05 ^
UJ ** *~
« >- IS
t- U. O
«o r>
X
c
UJ
H-
Z
CO
<
UJ
to
tr
UJ
>
o
4
JJ
<
u
»— t
u.
"
z
UJ
^-
Ti^ ' ^
w tL ^ O*o
^«
o
0
o
**
IT O- •!
CJI^
m O »
C -X 1 >-
~ tr. o n.
O«5 Q.
Z 0- 0
U-
0.
c
o
^- o
CO ~
UJ
o
^* O UJ
t> eo ct
O u.
£3 Q.
Z) C
QD
U.
Q.
*-*
O
O
o
UJ *^
^.
< 09
x
»*
*—
»
CD O* H- U-
*-* — Z O.
UJ O
a
c:
CJ
^
u.
a.
e
o
_J 0
CO < ^
<
^>
u.
a
bJ
-I
*-i
^«
^
~ UJ
o
o
u
o
•
o
o
0
Ji
o
o
c
o
^
in
o
•
o
o
o
9
^
UJ
CO
£t
UJ
>.
O
»4
K-
u
« CO
tr
U UJ
»•« H-
u. tr
"* 5
z o
UI O
•^ ^
U UJ
CO I
1/1 O
0 I
tf>
CO
o o o
• • •
0 O 0
o e o
O 0 0
JI — —
o o o
o c o
o o o
o o o
* fc ^
tr ir in
o o e
• • •
o c o
0 0 0
o o o
99 9
—1
J *- <
< o •-
t- (- o
o •-
»- z
tt •<
= 0. •-.
CO. C
« UJ
X
«0
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Scientific Activities Overseas S805
HQ X
REG.
MEDIA:
APPRO:
Mgt.
SAO
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The goals of the SAO program will continue to relate directly to environmental
problem areas specific to EPA domestic priority programs including studies to
provide increased capability to evaluate the environmental impact of chemicals
increased activity in the development of waste management technology and in
improving capabilities for reuse of limited water resources; the gathering of
primary data on health consequences of the use of toxic substances; the
collection of data on oil pollution to permit better clean-up practices; the
development of new technology to further reduce the level of industrial air
pollution; and the demonstration of best available technology for pollution
control in the areas of greatest concern.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Initiated 5 new projects - 3 were started in Egypt, one multimedia project
that includes 11 sub-tasks in India,- and .one in Pakistan.
Obtained final reports on projects initiated approximately 3 years ago in
Poland. These reports are being disseminated through EPA publications and in
the IE scientific journals. Research results shown in the reports are useful
to the EPA, environmental decision makers, regulatory officials and, the public
and private sectors.
Participated in the IS-Indian Bi-national Workshop on Environmental Pollu-
tion. This Workshop, sponsored by the Indian Department of Science and Tech-
nology, represented a significant breakthrough in the development of coopera-
tive programs. A multidisciplinary project was designed dealing with air
pollution, health and ecological effects, and water pollution.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
In Ef 79 excess foreign currencies will be used to design programs of mutual
benefit that utilize the facilities of leading environmental centers abroad to
extend EPA's domestic programs and to accomplish the goal of technology trans-
fer. Intensive efforts will be made to capitalize on unique control data on
health and environmental effects and data needed under EPA's legislation on
Industrial chemical control and to EPA's capability in measuring effects of
luman and environmental exposure to commercial chemicals. New programs will
36 initiated to address innovative multi-media treatment control technology,
research on new control technologies for water as well as for particular
industries, studies on toxicity, including the effects of selected commercial
chemicals on human health, testing procedures, and tracing the fate of heavy
netals and toxic substances in water systems, and development and demonstration
jf waste management practices applicable to specific IS conditions.
0237
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2{ DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'''''•••••••••••WViWWVW'i'MBIWWWWVllllMVipVWviBtBMMWMfllflltPVflkMltMMwaMWa
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CUDE HQ HEDJAi AG M &S
S805 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS APPRUJ SAO
********™w*****B**i***"*W*********'**|^*****iw*»»»BiP>W"*»>i»^HiWi»»«»»«i
B. KESOU«CE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY eo INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 03 FTE
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 4,000.0 3,000.0 3,000,0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
EYPT
1. Determination of potential hazards to human health of certain toxic
substances.
2. Studies of the management and disposal of hazardous industrial and
municipal waste discharges.
3. Determine the fate and effects of fresh water, coastal and ocean disposal
of waste materials and their relationship to the IS environment.
INDIA
1. Studies of environmental health effects associated with the reus'e of
waste waters for irrigation.
2. Analysis, assessment and control methodology for the toxic discharges
from fertilizer, coke oven and basic organic chemical industries.
*
PAKISTAN
1. Studies on low cost control technologies for industrial and trade wastes.
• Seminars will be held in Egypt (1) and in Pakistan (1) to disseminate
the results of ongoing and completed projects.
BENE UTS OF THIS LE \EL - The SAO program will continue to build on a solid
base of operations. IS expertise will be augmented through the use of well
trained foreign investigators. New technology will be extended into a
broader world community. Data required to implement IS laws will be gathered
more rapidly. Better quality control of data collection will be possible
through intercomparisons.
CONSEQIENCES 0 TNOT FLNDIN3 - Waste disposal information required for the
new Resources Recovery and Conservation Act will be less adequate. The
momentum of scientific cooperation in environmental projects will be reduced.
Objectives and goals of ORD, program and regional offices will not be
enhanced. Demonstration projects in application of best applicable
technology will not be conducted in certain needed areas.
0238
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm'*»mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmm»mmwmmmi'<*9m*H
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIA! AG H &S
S805 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS APPRO! SAO
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CU*
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 03 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0) 4,000,0 1,000,0 4,000,0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
SiYPT - Environmental effects of persistence and degradation of pesticides
and toxic residue.
INDIA - Correlation of health effects of air pollution in urban-rural
communities.
• Seminar will be held in India to disseminate results of current
projects
BENE KTS - Obtain additional multi-media control and abatement technology
in unique situations. Develop and demonstrate environmental practices
applicable to specific IS conditions. Provide useful review of progress
and aid in estimating future program needs. Expertise of IS and foreign
scientists will be shared.
CONSEQIENCES 0FNOT KNDIEG - Data for implementation of ITFRA will not be
available when needed. Ihique air pollution study area will not be
utilized to provide important data. There will be a reduction of communica-
tion in environmental improvement.
0238
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2J DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ
SB05 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES OVERSEAS
M£DIA| AG
APPROj SAO
&S
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
03 OF 03 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCH FY 80 CUM
,ooo.o
1,000.0
5,000.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
EGYPT - Investigations of the fate and ecological effects of oil and
derived hydrocarbons.
INDIA - Studies of fugitive and stack emission impact on air quality.
BENE EETS - Information and data on control and abatement technology will
augment that obtainable through domestic program. Develop and demonstrate
environmental practices applicable to specific IS conditions. Better data
from unpredictable oil spills will be available to improve cleanup
capability.
CONSEQUENCES 0 F NOT FINDIN3 - The IB will be less able to understand and
ameliorate the effects of oil tanker accidents. An opportunity, to test
the need for and effectiveness of emission control devices will be lost.
The pollution prediction capability of the IS will not be expanded or the
quality improved.
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
z
IS
<
>-
z cc
o <
•-> r
«j n
u eo
O UJ
a u
o. cr
3
_l O
< CO
•— UJ
z z
z o
UJ •— •
in
CO >—
UJ O
*- UJ
« 0
CO —
e
UJ X
*- ir
M O
Z u.
*~
CO
UJ
to
ST
UJ
c
CO
UJ
c: »-
o —
iH
CO 1
t—
z o
I U.
O •-<
< *-
z
>• UJ
f— fc-t
3 (V
a. to
UJ
o in
c
— cc
— to
a
cc
0-
cc
cr- ••»
— 0)
1
09
UJ
•v ts
» 2
C" "-i
~ 2
Z
*
n.
c
O1
-*«
u>
>
•-*
o *-
tc <
C> _J
— 3
=
(J
z
UJ
0 I
CD UJ
o- o:
•- o
z
»-
to
O UJ
r-.
o- ar
•- a:
=
u
tr «
p- 15
l> t-
«. U
e o
C 0
o in
O r-
1-1
0 O
c o
o in
o h*
M
o o
• •
c o
e in
o r-*
»
fi
o o
o c
o in
0 »~
^
K-l
O CO
• • »
C CO
o o m
o o r-
« ^
K> K1
O 00
• • •
O 0 C
o o in
o o *~
% ^
KI rt
o o o
• • •
o o c
o e o
0 O 0
« • *
9 9 v»
O
o
0 «-
« «- U. UJ
C < O Q. O U-
• UJ tt O *^ *--
u. I 1C 3 0
O — 3 I •» -
3 O < ^ CO
— < I S Z
0 t- o o
1- Z X >- M
_l UJ •* UJ « >-
aj O *-^ ^-^ _ 1 *•<
> c: t- to
UJ 3 3 O
-J CC O OL
e o
C 0
0 O
0 O
51 ~"
0 0
0 0
o o
o o
=T -
0 O
« •
o o
0 0
o o
» ^
sr — •
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 C
^ ^
sr —
o o c
• • •
0 CO
o o e
o o o
« » ^
^ sr ~«
o o o
• • •
O 0 O
o o in
o o nt
^ *
*« *~
O 00
• • •
o o o
o o o
o o o
» » fe
a si m~
o
o *•
If, •- U. UJ
o < o tv o u.
• UJ Ct O ^* w
U. X CO — 0
O — 3 r <« ••
3 o < — to
M < I CC Z
O >- CO C
H- Z X >- »-t
1 t.t »^ ll 1 ^ fa-
UJ ^ ^^ ^* _| *^
> O •- to
UJ 3 3 C
_l CC CO.
c o
o o
o in
o ru
in —
o o
o o
o in
o r\j
in —
0 O
m m
0 O
o m
o fa
in —
0 O
0 O
c in
o m
^ ^
m — •
o o o
• • •
o o o
o o in
O O(\J
in m —
o o o
o o o
e o in
o o m
^ ^
V* «M
0 O O
• • •
o e o
0 CO
0 O O
A fe te
sr a —
o
c
e t-
•9 r- U, UJ
o •* o a. o u.
• Uf o: o ^^ ^^
u. I ec 2 o
O »- 3 I •• —
3 C •< «^ 05
« < Z £E Z
0 >- CO O
*- Z X >- «
_J tu •• UJ < t-
uj o — -- _i —i
> C H- 03
UJ 3 3 C
_i ec o a.
02 sl
-------
o
Z
LJJ
a
o
UJ
H-
O
cc
a.
o|
ED
> «fl
z «o
LU H-
T
CO
O
u
u
Z
D
Z
O
C/3
U
LU
Q
cr
O
LL
4j' 0
.. a!
< O
Q £^
LU Q.
5 <
X .
u
O LU
I CC
m
o
00
CO
n)
0)
— CO
LU S-l
Q OJ
o ^
. I ^^
O co
Z (!)
su
LU i-^
j r*
(_ «rl
H 0
1— *£
Z 0
D -H
O II
— ,-<
C^ M
— a)
0 -H
LU U
Q co
<
Z
LU
I
00
a.
O
o
0
_l
«;
D
O
03
O)
r~
>~
LL
LU
LU
_J
LU
LU
|
.J
LU
^
LU
J
vJ
LU
^>
LU
-1
I
vjl
1
—1
LU
LU
_J
LU
LU
-J
ai
a> -,•
~ 0
> cr
LL a.
LU
1-
? -
LL LU
UJ
(T
D
CO
^
UJ
^J
c3
LU
_J
_
^
j_
Z
LU
I
oo
«J
CL
O
O
O
^
CO
OOLOOCSCMMrH
iH rH tS r-l
OOOOOOCNCSJCSr— 1
i— 1 r-l
.
OOtnvOrSrHNr-
r-vDLOvOr-liHCNTH
1 — 1
vOOOOCNCNi— li-H
i— 1 i— 1 CM iH
03
W 03
M bO
O C 03
CX T3 -H 60
CU CJ 'U -u C
c5 *j Q) a) -H
W 4J (1) 4-J
rH lH tfl 5- Q) 03
tfl 4J 3 03 •*' 0) 3
O O i— 1 T3 C 5- (U
•H bO cfl Lj o -H
C 0) > CB -H T3 >
£ S W 3 CO J-i (U
U < CO tfl P5
0) 03 03 -H O 03
u a o 1 co ce
i-HCUOJOJOJ-lCl-l
CO "i"™} *^~1 "^~1 O C *i~^ bC
COOOU3-HBO
oooooooo
-
<
CO
CO
ts
i
m
OOOOOOOO ~
U.
CL
im
»
-------
-------
------- |