-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
* ** * *^ ~ •* •• V * W • • • W • • * •• * • • • • V W V • • MM 9 •§ Ml • Qp (i H MOT •§ IP «f • • •• •• V 9 tf • K 0 gp |y ^ 9 ^ 10 4p V V ^ IP W> fli
A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO MEDIAj PG M &S
R369 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OE APPROt ENFORCEMENT
WQiWVOT***W*'*WVflFWWVWMIfliMMOTOTMVMWVfflMIWWfpWMIBMWW«WWW
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DRM 2? DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
'A. DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIM PG M &S
R369 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT-OE APPRO! ENFORCEMENT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 76 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 35.0 37.0 a.o 37.0
LEVEL OPFT 3.0 5.0 5.0
03 OF 05 FTE 4«.l 2,0 «<|.l
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 900.0 1,297.3 106.0 1,297,3
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
All of Level 2, plus:
- Provides more effective communications and increased public participation
for enforcement programs and AA.
- Provides additional capability for long-range and strategic planning.
- Provides program analysis capability for new programs.
IMPACT:
- Enforcement methods will be improved by providing a capability for in-
depth analysis of policy issues and long range planning.
51
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
£
19
<
>-
z ct
o •<
•i X
>- r
U =3
*-
o iu
oz u
3
-JO
< CO
*- IU
z or
Ul
31 «^
z «•»
0 Z
or 3
> z
z o
Uli-i
in
to —i
Ul U
1— Ul
« o
CO —
o
Ul Z.
t-CE
*•* o
z u
tu
c.
1
z
tu
U)
cs
t- «
z z
tu «
c z
Ul
u r
a «
o ec
U. C5
z o
tkl ft
a
•tf
2*€ ^
<
tU Kl
CM cr
CD
C-
••4
CO
o--.-.
— CO
tu
X
^
CO
CO Z
o- «•«
~ z
z
a
CO
c>
*M
Ul
t-4
O H-
CD <
^ vJ
VH ^
Z
0
-
UJ.
0 X
CC Ul
o- a
— 0
z
*~
o- ui
r-
0- IE
— a
u
_,
»>• n
o ^
~<
ru »^
r* *
O I***
o e
«U Kl
^ ^
O t*-
O 0
J^
M «
o r-
0 «O
J-^
CU Kl
•^ -0
o *-
O CO
«
• •
fU t\l O Kl O O 9
r* «u in -c co «v tn
O Kl f"» ^- l\| Kt
C O~ CC
*
V*
ru n» o KI o o 9
r- tu in * eo fa in
o KI ^r- ru K>
0 O CD
*
VN
Kl Kl 0^ O O •"
r- m a
C* fW '^ fU Kl a
tu «u »-
* * *
o o o o o
o e> KI «n KI
O O CD •**
o- o- ^
-*^
C
c
O f-
<* t- u. Ul
in «- _i ^» u. o. H-
o < o Q. o u
• ui or o ^* ^»
U. X CO Z> 0
O •- 3 X *» —
D O « ^ CO
— « X - t-i
_J Ul *• U' < »-
UJ C> — «-• _l "-1
> o ^- to
ui a s o
_l CC O CL
KI if* Kt r*-
— * 1^ CO
o KI o- ru
-» o tu -<
Ki in KI t*-
— • * f- CC
O Kl O- f\l
— O fU —
— — — ^J
Kl m Kl f.
O- K. 0- M
— o tu -•
— J« J« «Z
KI m KI r-
— « 1^ CO
O Kl O- tU
— o iu —
» ^ ^ »
** *^ •* »-
Kl Kl Olfl O C. — KIKlOr-OO —
— • « en « KI in «v >» tu in CD r<- in cr
O**»*-K*KI « ~c & tv«r tu
CDCC « O O O
^* •* — € V4 w^
K*KVO^»OO*- Kl KV O *>~ O O — »
^ tu in CD »- in «r r> tu in co >» in 9
Onj^-fXIKt 9 OtU^-tVKI 9
•u tu — m«\j -<
« » « • » •
oo ooo oo ooo
OO Kl in Kl OO KIITkKI
OOCCKI O O CD Kl
er c> r«- » »• ^
-»» -*•»
O 0
C 0
0 1- 0 t-
CR >-UUI « t- U. Ul
in^ — j ^^ u. CL >— m^» j^*ii.c.»—
O 4OCLCU. O < OQ. O U.
• ui a o «w «ui cr o ^»^
u I en — o U.XCO3O
O"-3r«*— o<-=>xc» —
3 o < ^ to no<«-»cn
f«•• en o o >—no
•— z x >- i-i _ z x >- M
— »tu •• ui « >- _i uj — ui « •-
UjC5^-'^'^*«t Ul O *^ »^ — J i^
>o t- tn >o >-cn
uin =>o tu=> DO
_ICC OO. -ICC OO.
-------
o
Z
LU
O
o
LU
I-
o
cc
Q.
CC §
> w
Z W
LU H-
LU
X
if)
O
(J
U
D
Z
o
LU
Q
cc
O
4J
.U C
C CU
cu e
e a)
flj f)
oo M
ca o
ca c
S W
.. 0.'
< O
D ?
LU Q_
5 <
o
s
0
O LU
X EC
^_i
0>
tti
C
<1
LU £
Q S
0 vJ
o c
•^ c
fc!
^
UJ *"
^t C
-J a
f- £
H Q
^ 0
1- C!
U
ic
00 (.
0 g
LU £
D.
<
M
t-
z
LU
Z
eg
3
D.
J>
o
o
u
^
^r
_i
D
2
D
CJ
o
00
o
>.
LL
_J
LU
^
LU
-1
n
i
LU
LU
~*
.j.
_J
LU
^
LU
_l
I
•rJ
LU
>
UJ
J
_j
LU
^
LU
-J
I
'
LU
^
LU
O
r**
Ol -^j
*" O
> CC
u. a.
LU
1-
05 S
>- , 0) O. CO M
*° g ,c § ^ '•'"'
T3 U & CO
0) rH i-l i-l
S 0) JS f*. «
cu c ^ j-i M
•H Cfl i— 1 Lj
> a M ca o
0) O C **-<
(-1 >, 4-1 CU CU
4J a, M
CO r-l CO
cu ce a) >-. o
CO C CO XI CO
Cfl CU Cfl Cfl
O P, O T3 O
cu
ooaiocuo 53
4J t-t
h MM M > M
cu i-t a) o cu cu cu
JD CU ^ CU .O M XI
EC e ex e B
3 ca 33 3 to 3
!3 p< S CO 3 -H a
,^
00
r^
00
cs
0
CM
E
o
LU
Q.
LU
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Buildings & Facilities (R480)
HO. 0PM
REG.
MEDIA: Mgt.
APPRO: B & F
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of this decision unit are to ensure that Agency
facilities are adequate to meet program requirements, safe for program
staff and operations, in compliance with Federal pollution abatement re-
gulations, energy efficient, and that the Federal investment in real pro-
perty is protected. This decision unit provides funding for repairs and
improvements and new construction projects to accomplish these objectives,
Facilities program management staff are funded by another appropriation.
C) FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Sixteen repair and improvement projects to correct health and safety
conditions or maintain the property have been completed or are underway.
In addition, the construction contract for the Central Regional Laboratory
at Manchester, Washington, was awarded during FY 78. This project is ex-
pected to be completed in March 1979.
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Ten repair and improvement projects required for correction of safety
deficiencies or serious disrepair of facilities are planned. In ad-
dition, preparation of the Program of Requirements and contracting for
the design and construction of a laboratory facility for research in
carcinogens and toxic substances at Gulf Breeze, Florida (the second
step in a three-phase construction program to provide safe facilities)
will be provided.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2« DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R480 BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
HQ
i PQ M iS
APPRPi FACILITIES
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY
INCR FY 80 CUM
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 1,001.0 2,563.0 900.0 900.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
1. Provides for repair and improvement projects for design of pol-
lution abatement projects at laboratories in accordance with Agency
effluent guidelines and for correction of the most serious safety
deficiencies.
The projects follow
552.
Narragansett, R.I.
Beltsville, MD
Vint Hill, Va.
Bears Bluff, S. C.
Athens, Ga.
Gulf Breeze, Fla.
Montgomery, Ala.
Bay St. Louis, Miss.
Chicago, 111.
Duluth. Minn.
Ada. Okla.
Denver, Colo.
Corvallis, Ore.
Wenatchee, Wash.
Manchester, Wash.
Benefits of Funding
Lab Entrance Design $ 3,000
Security Lighting A,500
Meter Interlock 2,500
Pump Replacement 26,000
Fuel Tank Cross Connection 2,000
Pollution Abatement Design 25,000
Lab Mods (Bldg. 306) 100,000
Carcinogen Storage Construction * 75,000
Pollution Abatement Design 3,000
Water Supply System Design 5,000
Repl. Cooling Twr Roof 4,000
Sprinkler System Design 15,000
Fume Hood/Scrubber System 35,000
Fume Hood System Design 10,000
Containment Lab Design 3,000
Pollution Abatement Design 65,000
Carcinogen Storage Design 15,000
Fire Suppression Design 4,000
Safety Mods Design 20,000
HVAC Construction 420,000
Sanitary Sewer Design 2,000
Water Supply Sys. Design 6.000
$ 850,000
Correction of safety deficiencies identified in contract industrial
hygiene surveys, and compliance with pollution abatement guidelines.
Consequences of Not Funding
The health and safety of Agency employees and the general public
are jeopardized and could result in closing some laboratories.
Provides for preparation of the Program of Requirements and con-
tracting for the design of an electrical switchgear, shop, and
storage building at Gulf Breeze, Florida. $ 50,000
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
Level 1 of 2 continued
Benefits of Funding
Design and construction of this facility is the final step in a three
phase program to replace existing frame structures with more adequate,
less hazardous facilities.
Consequences of Not Funding
Would require continuing occupancy in an unsatisfactory wood frame
structure endangering personnel, equipment and supplies.
Construction funds will be requested in FY 1981.
58
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2S DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE
R480 BUILDINGS » FACILITIES
HQ
i PG M &S
APPROt FACILITIES
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
02 OF 05 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000,0)
FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E, FY BO INCR FY 80 CUM
1*001.0
2,563.0
525.0
1,425.0
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Provides repair and improvements required for correction of safety
and security deficiencies and serious disrepair of facilities.
Edison,
Gulf Breeze, Fla.
Cincinnati, Ohio
Duluth, Minn.
Grosse lie, Mich.
Ada, Okla.
Denver, Colo.
Corvallis, Ore.
Wenat chee, Wash.
Manchester, Wash.
Benefits of Funding
Sanitary Sewer System
Water Supply Sys. Design
Heating Sys. Design
Elec. Sys. Mod. Design
Security Fencing Design
Sprinkler Sys. Mods
Relocate/Renovate Bid. 34
Renovate Bldg. 7 Design
Remove Bldg. 25/26
Concrete Pavement Repairs
Roof Repairs
Storage/Paint Shop Design
Lab Waste Drain Lines
Design to Upgrade for Labs
Air Cond. Equip, Design
Egress Mod Design
HVAC Mod Design
Ele. Service Mods
Security Fence
Access Road Design
Bldg. 60 Mod Design
Pier Repair Completion
$ 150.000
20,000
50,000
20,000
8,000
12,000
60,000
2,000
4,000
.33,000
8,000
3,000
5,000
30,000
30,000
5,000
24,000
15,000
2,000
6,000
3,000
35.000
$525,000
Provides correction to items of disrepair at EPA facilities, a safer
environment for EPA employees, and provides facilities to better sup-
port program missions.
Consequences of Not Funding
Safety corrections will not be made, some EPA facilities would not
receive routine maintenance type repairs, and program functions
would be limited by the quality of facilities available.
57
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
z cc
o <
•- X
u =3
UJ CO
»-
O UJ
Or U
CL Or
_l O
« co
t- UJ
z tr
UJ
z ^-
Z 1-1
o z
or =>
»*
>• z
z c
UJ •*
to
CO II
UJ O Kl a
O ITi —
i ru o a
a a
o o o - r> x •» -
13 O « +* to
— < x or z
o >- to o
>- Z X >• x
_| U) M UJ < »-
> c >- eo
ui 3 => o
_j cc o o.
o
o
o t-
x •» -
r> o •« ~»to
ru •« X or z
o t- to o
H- Z >C >- •—
J UJ *^ UJ < ^
UJ o »--^- _l •—
>• fi t- to
uj r> => o
_J IE O O-
-------
o
z
UJ
CD
O
UJ
O
tc
Q.
59
£E =
> w
Z JO
U,H
UJ
a.
O
O
8
Z
g
V)
o
UJ
'OC
O
u.
JJ fa
60 ta
s: CQ
.. a.'
<£ O
2£
s<
ff* ^fc
£
MJ
o
C3
O uj
X CC.
^^,
o
1
ca
\^f
CO
Ol
1-1
— . JJ
UJv4
Qi-<
O-H
Q«
15
UJ CO
_J bO
1- C
K£
^T3
1—'—'
h
3»
z
0
CO
0
UJ
a
<
M
h-
z
UJ
to
e.
5
o
o
u
<
UJ
>
H
<
D
5
2
o
CO
01
^
u.
1
_J
UJ
UJ
_l
1
1
J
UJ
UJ
•J
1
1
-1
UJ
>
UJ
_J
1
_l
UJ
>
UJ
_J
4
_!
UJ
>
UJ
_l
J
_)
UJ
>
UJ
_J
OV-
r*.
o> — ;
** ^1
- o
> cc
u. a.
UJ
»<
^1
>S
UB jifJ
UJ
CC
D
to
<
UJ
2
o3
UJ
_j
H
K
H
2
UJ
5
I
to
_i
a.
O
U
u
<
CD
1
*
0 0
mo- o 1-1
^ <• in
CO
i— i
.
p
.
0 0 » ^H
• ^^^1
o CM o r-i .^^B
m CM m
.
0 0
co o o
*45 i— < o i— i
in in
o i^.
CM \O OO
Cn r-l Ov
•-I f-i i-(
—1 CM
JJ U i
C Oi O
oi ui e t-i
E u a
JJ Ol CO 0>
CO >•> JJ JJ Ol
oi o o co >
> <-i ai g -H
CD. i-l CO O" JJ W
•HE O JJ O> U jj
0) LI o -o oi y
>, o. oi cd ^ ai
O « i-i VW -^-l W
C>i MO -OOi. OJJ
aiuoatictoijo
M ^ ai a. co 1-1 c a • 1-1 <-< > . j^H
JJ ^ 0 > -H E 0 ^H
o TJ z o y co -co-2; ^H
^ C C ^ C8 U 7^
CL, -H CO (i, U-i 60 |oi
>-< CM
I
Ik
2
W
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1: DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
POLICY DIRECTION R-503
HO ;
REG.
MEDIA: MGMT.
APPRO: A&RM
B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
o Provides overall executive direction and leadership necessary for manage-
ment of the Agency
c Manages Agency EIS preparation & review activities; and compliance with
NEPA requirements
o Provides for legislative services and congressional relations
c Provides expert, independent advice to the Administrator on the
scientific and technical issues facing the Agency
c Fulfills formal international environmental treaties; manages the Agency's
relations with other countries
c Manages the Agency's relations with the public, the news media, State &
local governmental officials and other Federal agencies
Manages the Agency's civil rights program
Provides for formal administrative law hearings as req. by law or regs
FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
n™V^ °ve^1:1- direction & management of the Agency; special assistance
provided to the Administrator in the area of Indian policy and intra-
agency coordination of TOSCA-IRLG
Developed a coordinated program to implement Pres' urban policy including
initiatives on land use and growth impacts j-ucxuuj.iig
P™P^ 30.leSi!lative proposals, followed-up on 180 Congessional hearing,
Provided scientific advice on 15 major policy issues .
Initiated international participation in the toxic substances control
effort as well as international exchanges of research & information
Carried out equal opportunity hiring and employment programs
Held a full schedule of Administrative Law Hearings
Managed EIS program; assured EPA compliance with NEPA requirements
Provided public awareness services
Maintained liaison with officials of State & local governments and
arranged for their input on issues and policies
c Developed innovative projects integrating EPA programs with State and
local governments and other Federal agencies
D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Continuation of FY78 activities in addition to these changes:
o An increase in ALJ caseload is anticipated especially in the area of
pesticide cancellation cases
Implementation of a minority business enterprise program
Establishment of a newly mandated Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee
Upgrade support of the Administrator's international toxic substances
control initiative
Implementation of President's urban policy
The following functions will no longer be provided in this decision unit:
o Contract Compliance function—transferred to the Department of Labor.
60
c
c
C)
0
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 2« DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
m*mmmmmmmmmmmm<*mm*"*mmmm'*""mmmmmf'l"fm*i*'*"**f'*m*mmfmmtfmmm*mmmmmmmmmmmm
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HO HEDIAj PG M &S
R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPROj AGENCY i REG MGT
" * * ** • W W • • • 9 W W W M • • » • IB Hi V Mi •> V • d fp V W • •§ • * p> <9 •• • IP V • • • • M M M V • M • • M M M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 60 INCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 265.0 289.0 219.0 219 0
l-^EL OPFT 33.0 «6.0 jslo 3S.Q
01 OF °8 FTE 364.0 303,9 303.9
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0) 10,657.5 12,030.5 S235.2 9,235^
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Provides for the basic operation of the Office of the Administrator, the
Science Advisory Board and each of the seven staff offices. At this level,
provides for staff support and limited advisors to the Administrator, con-
trol of only the most critical correspondence (White House, OMB, Congress)
addressed to the Administrator. Provides for the five standing Science
Advisory Committees that were in operation in FY78; emphasis will be on the
review of the five-year R&D plan and provision of advice to the Administrator
on major scientific issues. Provides for a focal point and secretariat for
the Regions in Headquarters to assure regional participation in agency policy
and regulation development. Provides support for testimony on major legis-
lative proposals and Congressional liaison; meets only the most crucial and
insistent demands of Congress and OMB; fills the basic Agency needs for le-
gislative packages, testimony, briefings, and legislative reference materials
Allows for basic press services, abbreviated EPA Journal, speech 'support for
A/DA, basic publications and the operation of the Visitor's Center. Allows
for coordination of US/USSR and Common Market international environmental
agreements. Provides basic policy guidance and oversight of the Great Lakes
and Ocean Dumping Program. Provides technical guidance and direction for
the Agency's Civil Rights efforts. Token conduct of Agency internal EEO,
discrimination complaints, Hispanic, Women's and external civil rights pro-
grams. Minority Business Enterprise effort would be initiated through a con-
tract. Provides for limited oversight of NEPA compliance activities.
Hearings and prehearing conferences would be held on regulatory actions in
accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act.
Benefits; Provides for a minimal level of executive direction and leader-
ship necessary for the management of the Agency
Consequences of not Funding; Would remove the leadership support function
from the Agency, including functions required by statute. Reor-
ganization and recission of law would be required.
61
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ORM d\ DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
„ DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HQ MEDIAf PG M 8,8
RSOS POLICY DIRECTION APPROJ AGENCY & REG MGT
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. FY 80 1NCR FY 80 CUM
POSITIONS PFT 265.0 289,0 34,0 253.0
LEVEL OPFT 33.0 46.0 6.0 41.0
02 OF 08 FTE 364.0 25.5 329.4
BUDGET AUTH. (000.03 10,657.5 12,030.5 1,663.2 10,898.4
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Acids secretarial and speechwriting support, assistance and advice to the
Administrator on agricultural matters. Adds scientific review and advice,
protocal guidelines and health risk assessments related to TCSA. Provides
for ongoing liaison with national organizations of intergovernmental offi-
cials. Increases capacity to handle Congressional requests, correspondence
and support for Congressional testimony. Increases press and constituency
services in TSCA, Air and Water programs. Negotiate with Canada and Mexico
on cross-border environmental issues. Develop policies on coastal areas and
oceans. Provide staff assistance for Hispanic, Women's and internal affir-
mative action programs. Improve EPA's own environmental assessments and EIS.
Reduces backlog of Administrative law cases requiring hearings.
Benefits: The functions and responsibilities of the staff offices would be
conducted in a marginally acceptable fashion. Most mandated
activities could be supported.
Consequences of not funding: No discretionary activities could be performed.
62
EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 25 DECISION UNIT LEV£L ANALYSIS
A, DECISION UNIT TITLE AND CODE HG MEDIAf pG"M"I™""""""""
R503 POLICY DIRECTION APPRO? AGENCY & REG MGT
B. RESOURCE SUMMARY FY 78 ACT FY 79 C. E. * FY^o'lNCR*"™Y*8o"cUM
. POSITIONS PFT . ass.o 239,0 13.0 266.0
LEVEL OPFT 33.0 «6.0 50 46 0
03 OF 08 FTE 364.0 13.7 343 1
BUDGET AUTH, (000.0) 10,657.5 12,030.5 648.8 11,547^2
C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OP THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
Adds assistance to the Administrator in the area of urban policy and land use
planning; conduct scientific review of five new major regulations; increased
support for Congressional hearings and testimony. Adds complete staffing
for the Minority Business Enterprise initiative, and provides for area EEO
coverage in Cincinnati and Las Vegas. Adds additional EIS review capability.
Provides some increased capability to handle anticipated Administrative Law
Judge caseload related to pesticides cancellations.
BENEFITS: Provides an adequate level of support for implementation of the
Minority Business Enterprise program, and the development of land use strate-
gies and policies; some added capacity for monitoring Congressional hearings
and provision of independent scientific advice to the Administrator as well
as reducing the backlog of Administrative Law Judge hearing caseload.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FORDING: All staff office activities would remain at
token performance levels.
63
EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)