-------
        Z
        c
        o
 o
tt O —
tL LJ 00
   EC —
_J   U
« ^- UJ
•- 4U O
z o
ku o
Z (C
o   •-
ir tc n
•M X IU
> O D
Z   O
kit o UJ
0> O-
U,
« X C
»- U. C
                  IT P- «
                  U »-
                  hhj C'
                -.o —
                O N.  I *-
                •— o: o u.
                  o CD a.
                  z o- o
                OB) tt
                v-O-
                     O K.
                     O CL
                     =3 O
                     C
                     z o.
                     LU O
                     E
                     IE
                     3
                     U
ni


(U


o

o
                                                                                                                                                   0
                                                                                                                                                   *»
                                                                                                                                                    I
                                                                                                                                                    I
                                                                                                                                                   o-
                                                                                                                                                    o
                                  0
                                  CM
                                             e-
                                             
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

"0PM  2: DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
    DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       M£DIA|  j
 105  ANTICIPATORY  R & P                            APPROl  H &  D

B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 76  ACT FY  79 C.  E.   FY  60  INC«   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         73.0         93.0          1«.0         65.0
 LEVEL              OPFT                         3.0                         3.0
02  OF  10             FTE                       93.9           7.0         93.3
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     3,900.0     14,932.0       2,300.0    13,383.0

   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Activities

        o  Provide continuing  support for four research centers  initiated  in
    FY-79 as a means of implementing recommendations made to  Congress for the
    conduct of long term research.  These four centers and their  corresponding
    aims are:  (1)  Epidemiology-Develop new methods for conducting  epidemiological
    studies; (2)   Advance Technology-Develop understanding of basic  phenomena
    important to  treatment of wastes; (3)  Groundwater-Conduct long  term studies
    of pollutant  movement and  transformation in groundwater systems;  (A)
    Integrated Exposure Monitoring-Develop methods and field  test approaches for
    monitoring total body burdens.  EPA's credibility would be secriously weakened,
    if these recently established long term research programs were not  continued.
        o  Provide support  for mussel watch program. -  This  program now entering
    into its 3rd  year of field  sampling, is providing new insights  into potential
    hot spot pollution areas in U.S. coastal waters. Continuing  support is needed
    to establish  trends, isolate seasonal phenomenon, and assess  the potential long
    term significance of pollution loads on coastal waters.  A comprehensive paper
    describing the progress  of  the project by authors from 8 participanting
    institutions,  including  the Woods Hole and Scripps Institutes of  Oceanography,
    has been submitted to Environmental  Conservation.
                                                                      J; ' ••
                                                                      U_
 f P « r	
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  £j DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND CODE          HQ
H105  ANTICIPATORY  R & D                         •   APPROj  R &  0

B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C,  E.   FY  8Q  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          73,0         93.0           8,0         93,0
 LEVEL              OPFT                         3,0                         3.0
03  OF 1C             FTE                       93.9           4.0         97.3
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000,0)     3,900.0     1*1,932.0       1,549,0     14, 933,0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

   Activitity

        o  Provide support for Cancer  Research to approximately  the FY-79 level.
   Specifically provide for epidemiology  studies on the Gulf Coast and one other
   potentially high exposure level  area  in order to determine the relationship
   between carcinogens in the environment and  disease in man. Continued support
   will  be provided for in depth investigations of cancer hot spots identified
   by  NCI, e.g., the New Jersey and Detroit studies being funded in FY-78.
        o  Continue support to Forecasting Program to develop forecasts of
   emerging problems.  Funding provides  the only organized cross-media long range
   forecasting activity in EPA.  It will  aim to identify new research ideas and
   identify the scope of potential  problems warranting further research.
   Specifically support Up-Grade, World  literature watch, and two assessments of
   perceived problems generated by  new-regulations or advances in science.  For
   example, research dealing with the  development of new genotypes is expanding
   rapidly.  The potential environmental  impacts are not yet bain,; r-oalyzed but ar
   typical of the future problems to be  assessed in this program.
        o  Initiate a center for long  term research on ultimate  disposal problems
   of  solid waste on soil systems.   The  Science Advisory Board and OWWM have
   identified long term research on soil  systems as a need the agency must
   recognize.  EPA's Research Outlook  specifically forecasts a growth in the
   volumes of solid waste likely to be generated in the future.   The initiation
   of  center •Jro-r long term studies  in  this area is designed to address this need.
   It  will specifically focus on long  term impacts likely to result from use of
   land  systems to dispose of solid." residues.
        o  Initiate pilot terrestial biomonitoring program to forecast long term
   impacts on terrestial ecosystems.   This activity will complement the mussel
   watch program in coastal waters.  It will represent the second of a three part
   pilot program to identify hot spots and trends through biological monitoring.
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

 OP*  2: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
    DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HQ       MEDIAj  INTRDPL
H105  ANTICIPATORY R &  D                            APPRO:  R &  D
B, RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
04 OF 10 FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
FY 78 ACT
73.0


It 900.0
FY 79 C. E.
93.0
3.0
93.9
1«, 932.0
FY 60 INCR
5,0
6,0
13.5
2,000,0
FY 60 CUM
98.0
9.0
110.8
16,933,0
  C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
    Activity
        o  Initiate two centers  for  long  term research
             (1)   Intermedia Transport Phenomenon - Purpose:  To investigate the
                  pollutant exchange rates between media with emphasis on air to
                  land and water,  land  to air and water to air processes.  Land
                  water exchange rates along with nutrient exchanges are subjects
                  of current investigations, but the wash out rates of other
                  toxic substances and  the emission rates from different land
                  patterns have  not  been  characterized.  This study will
                  investigate  these  and other intermedia chemical f.luxes.
             (2)   Integated Ecosystem Study - The EPA Science Advisory Board
                  believes the agency is  not conducting sufficiently broad and
                  integrated ecosystem  studies>i.e. past efforts have been aimed
                  primarily at toxicity studies in laboratories.  This study would
                  be designed  to investigate a stressed watershed which is
                  expected to  recover as  a result of regulatory actions.
        o  The Innovative Research Program has received initial expressions of
           support both within OMB and  in Congress as an important step toward
           improving the internal scientific competence of  the Agency and as a
           means of assuring that unique  "bottoms-up" proposals are supported.
           Funding this level  will allow  a modest number of new starts
           (approximately 15 scientists)  to be initiated, thereby, allowing new
           people and ideas to be supported by the program in FY-80.  The specific
           theme in FY-80 will be to explore the utility of existing data banks.
           Concerns have been  expressed that EPA collects considerable amounts of
           data for single purpose-'projects which largely goes unutilized.  Such
           data could yield new  insights  into these and other environmental
           problems if fully analyzed.  This expansion will attempt to address
           this concern by increasing the internal capability "of the Agency to
           perform empirical analyses of  existing data.
        o  The Science Advisory  Board has expressed support for Increased re'search
           in biological monitoring. This level provides partial support to
           initiate a pilot biological  monitoring program for fresh waters.  It
           will complement the mussel watch program (Level 2) and the terrestrial
           bio-monitoring program (Level  3).  The efforts will be compled with
           an going activity to  develop a pilot specimen bank and will enable all
           important biogeographical areas to be included in a comprehensive
           program.


                                                                       U-, .< /-i
                                                                       Uj. v
-------





















>•
LJ
Z
UJ

<
>.
z cr
o <
*- r
»- r
u 3
t»-
O tai
tr LJ
tx cc
3
_J 0
« CO
*- UJ
z a
tcU
I >-
z **
0 Z
ce 3
> z
z o
UJ **
CO
CO —
uj u

« a
CO «
o
UJ I
r- cc
z u.
3







l_
Z
D.
O O
lU flit
UJ CC
a
^
•*• e
0
i •-
u «
cc a
^ w
tj i « 1
CO —
UJ 1-
a. z
<
^
DOIT ;s
rv. I



g.
CD
cr


CO
cr «•>
— CO
UJ
X
HI*
r~
CO

ru c9
cc z

o tn
m ru
CO «
0 -C
- ~
o m
m ru
CD «
o •£
- -


o m
• •
m nj
CO ^
o -o
£ -

o m
• •
*^ (V
o ^
o «a
<» i,,
•» «•
*



o o o *n o o ^
^ O f^  -O
«e o « -«D r- c>
c in ir* *
* * ^ »
— ru co —


o o o m e o m
co o co -o r>- co
o in in ^
» « « »
— ru » —
~



o e o co o o cr
iw «^ en o- <* r*> m
pn o ru m cr cr
cr o m «v
* * ^ ^
sf «r — u. UJ
o •* j -^ u. a. *-
^ < O Cw O U.
•UJ CC O «a^ ^^
U. Z CO 3 O
o •- 3 r «n —
3 O «r ^ cr;
— •< r a z
o »- co o
«- z x >- «.
_l uj — uj «: >-
> o —  m
m o r\i m cr cr
cr ^ i*% AJ

o «• e ni
0 0 0 0 0
o ?». m mm
o -o m » >-
cr ••»•• in
m -> ru



^^
o
o
0 »-
M *- U- UJ
o ~ _>*~u. a. »-
— < on. o >«.
• UJ ct e ** «-
U. I « 3 0
c »- 3 r •» —
3 O < **CO
ru < x CC Z
0 »- COO
>- z x >--.
_JUJ — UJ •< •-
> c r-  H- U- UJ
o *•* -j -^* u. O- ^>
— « o o. o u.
•UJ CC O ^^ ^»
u. X en 3 o
O •- 3 s: «» —
3 O <• ^ce
m < X o: z
C ^ CO O
>- Z X >- ««
vj UJ •* uj ^ r*
> C t- co
UJ 3 30
_l K O O.


o cr
ru cr
m m
cr m
-o rv
e> cr
ru er
m m
cr tf\
•a ru


o er
• •
rw cr
m m
» in
•c ru

o er
• •
ru cr
m m
er m
« «
-o ru
VB



o o o cr o
ru orucr co
K» cr w m er
cr ru « m
% ^ « *
•o mm rv


o o e e cr m
m o AI m cr
cr -c m fu

o «r o rv
o o o o o
o r*. »^ m m
o -c m co >-
cr — f». m
m — ru



^
o
o
o
«t t—
O ^ _JJ^«U.
— < o o.
• uj tr o
u. x tn 3 o
o — 3 ^ •» —
3 O < «- co
a < i tr z
o •«• co o
>- Z X >- <-i
_J UJ — UJ « »-
> C r- en
UJ 3 3 O
—1 CO O O.
































O CD
er o
•«•
«*




om
om







o er
•»i»^
tr














f—
u. UJ
o- *-
o u.










       CO
•
-------






















o
LU
O
<
Z
o
i—
u
LU
1-
0
**•
L».
ex
_J
<

z >
LU r-
5 5
'lAIIAinS
INOUIA
2 W
UJ t-
Z
LLJ
SE
I
t/5

_)
D.
IT. ACCOM
: DECISION UN
•c
^
cr
O
u.

D.
C"
•H
T3
V.
CJ Q
u «•£}
c &
W_J
a.
< O
5 £
UJ cL"
2 <



O
c^
O
C3
O U!
ItT
L-L



























— in
LU 0
D .-1
o as
O s-'
S*
2- 0
< B5
ISION UNIT TITLE I
ICIPATORY RESE4
U H
UJ 3
D <

<






M
f_

"Z.
LU
«>
C^
C/5
Zj
Q.
«~
s
o
CJ
o
<
LU
>
H-
<
_J
r>
2
c»
33
D
O
CO
0
>
1 1__







1
_J
UJ
LU
_1


_I
LU
>
LU
«-I


UJ
_J
^
_l
LU
>
LU
_l
1
-J
^•1
1
~ml
LU
>
LU
_J
^
_i
UJ
LU
_l

en
r^
o — ,•
'r~ o
w
> c
u. a.

LU
=0 <
si
>fe
LU LU






LU
EC
LE & MEASU
OMPLISHMENT TIT
u
 iHO OOOCM
^D rH

\O O O VD 00 CM
O O vO .-4





ro sr o .-im OCOCM
\O f-( r-i


2
rH
O
10
O
i-l
as
CO C ««
E -H c 4J
to to en o en t> •.
Vi tOM-UT) iH tDtn
t^cu Eeccoi -a cu 14-1 CD
BO 4J (DOCU3 Oi -d S-iJii
o e E iHLjEto too "aajto
t-n a) co .coicncn « S >%o ^H
o u M otn-H xic^'ne
•H 00 MOOCL) 60 > jjci-ijntnto O-HM
w AJ cjcu 60-Hcu jr-r-itn UCOOOAJC) CXAJO
3 LJ> VJC>-I CO OCI 0)LjO-H-H"CtOCUtCli-i
\-> AJ coo (UOJ2 AJ uoo i-iHL4&-oc:cuMi-i
QJ i-l QJiJ ESO )-i COSCJ OPk SC8-H tl)«
U AJ CO pj tJ O CU tJ t-lSCAJUx-vMOJ
C tn QJC iH PM CX tO-O'^ CuW<;o03CO)r-l LJ
co c oioujtc ojcuaiAJ o o* -H o ex--' to 3
cj M-O -H ocjeo oi alAJS-i 1-1^ AJOJ-HCC -OAJ
01 (UAJ -H C COO RCLit-lCJAJAJ tUtSi-l
M-i H-1J2 >Cfl 0300-fl IM L4L4O. dCjeJtO
en f-i AJ-H en i— i LJ ucuc B-HO>^-^JCXO*C>*JI-IIH
LjQ) L4rH COO COOOJ Lj CUCO BSeDLjCCECX.T-10 M-H
cu-H o^> >^ CJ-HE fljococi-i cu3OOoajcj)-iw-icioo
X1T3 4DCO OAJ CPP3U3 J3OOUH-IH *OBSfc3StJCJ.C>- *&


















































o
r^
w
CM
t
0
^
04
E
0
u.
<
a

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                    HO ORD      MEDIA: Interdis,

     Scientific  Assessment   H110                  REG.        APPRO:
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       The goal of the scientific assessment program is to provide the Agency's
   regulatory programs with a centralized capability for evaluating effects
   from exposure to pollutants and estimating the level of risk involved.
   The program will be capable of reviewing known information about pollutants
   and their effects upon the environment, assessing this information and
   producing scientific data summaries for risk assessment or other regulatory
   decision making. The evaluation of risk for all significant health effects
   with a current priority for carcinogenesis, mutagenesis,  teratogenesis and
   sterility will be a major function of the program.

       With the development of Agencywide guidelines for risk and exposure
   assessment the program will significantly improve the uniformity and

                          Agency
       In 1978,  the scientific assessment program had two components; a Cancer
   Assessment Group (CAG),  and a criteria and effects assessment activity to
   serve the Agency's  air regulatory office.   The CAG (with 11  positions),
   continued guideline development  for  the evaluation of  carcinogenic potential
   and risk, performed risk assessments for all  other Agency offices except
   radiation, reviewed assessments  for  some Agency programs and acted as a
   health policy advisory body to the Agency.  Approximately 90 units of work
   were processed.

       The criteria and effects assessment activity (12 positions)  initiated
   work on four  air criteria documents  completed  work on  three  others and
   conducted two assessments of health  hazard  for the Agency's  air  regulatory
   office.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

       The  program  has  two  components;  hazard  risk assessment,  and  criteria
   development /effects  assessment, both of  which  are  expanded over  the 1978
   level.   In the risk  assessment area,  the capability of  the CAG has been
   extended  and  new assessment  groups for  exposure and reproductive  effects
   were started  with a  first year objective to develop Agencywide guidelines
   for  developing and evaluating exposure  data and pollutant effects  on
   the  human reproductive system including  mutagenesis.

       The  criteria  development/effects  assessment activity expanded  its  outputs
   for  the Agency's  air program by starting work  on two air criteria  documents,
   completing work on two others, conducting seven air hazard health  assessments
   and  evaluating one special regional  air  pollution problem.  A new  criteria
   development activity was  initiated in 1979 to  provide water quality  criteria
   for  65 Consent Decree chemicals plus  an  additional 15 suspect water  contamin-
   ants.
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

      2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSTS
    DECISION UNIT TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAj  JNTRDPL
HMO  CARCINGN  ASSESS GRP(CAG)/ENV  CRTA  8,  ASSESSAPPRC31  R  8, D
6. RESOURCE SUMMARY
POSITIONS PFT
LEVEL OPFT
01 OF Ott FTE
BUDGtT AUTH. (000,0)
FY 76 ACT
"21.0
«.o

7,500.0
FY 79 C. E. f
51.0
?o.o
74.5
7,617.5
rY 60 INCR
36.0
6.0
55.9
3,6n5.0
FY 80 CUM
38,0
8,0
55.9
3,605.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       Hazard Risk Assessment

           The Cancer Assessment Group will review and update Agency policy
       and methodology on cancer risk evaluation.  In addition it will review risk
       assessments done by other Agency program offices and  can conduct  a number
       of assessments on an as needed basis.  Each program office has a  different
       mixture of requirements which range from preliminary  to final assessments.
       This funding provides about 50% of the projected Agency need as follows:

          Pesticides    - review and or develop 6 pollutant  assessments
          Toxics        - review 27 pollutant assessments
          Air           - conduct 26 pollutant assessments
          Water Supply  - review and or develop as necessary 12 assessments
          Water Quality - review and or develop as necessary 22 assessments
          Regions       - perform risk evaluations for 6 special problems

       Criteria Development and Effects Assessment

       _A-,r:  Will finish HC, SOx and particulate air criteria documents  begun
       in 1979.  A review and update of 5 of 7 criteria documents will be initiated
       One assessment of health hazard for special regional  problems will be
       initiated (problem to be identified by Region at later date).  Four assess-
       ments of air health hazard will be done for OANR to support their regulatory
       program in hazardous pollutants.  Candidate pollutants will come  from
       results of preliminary CAG risk evaluations done in FY 1979.

       Water:  Will initiate work on 9 water quality criteria documents  which will
       consider bath human health and aquatic factors.  (The 9 is from an OWWM
       list of 41 pollutants).  In addition, the health criteria effort  on 45 of
       the 65 Consent Decree pollutants started  in 1979 will be completed and
       turned over to OWHM for final criteria document preparation.

       Impact;  The three program areas listed above are cornerstones in the
       Agency's effort  to develop scientific criteria for air and water  office
       decision making  and render assessments as to the level of cancer  risk
       involved.   Without these programs the program offices would have  to provide
       for themselves and suffer the potential criticism of  non uniformity
       of approach and  parellel/ overlapping efforts.
                                                                       UUL
  EPA Form 24)0-11 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A.  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HQ       MEDIAj INTRDPL
MHO  CARCINGN  ASSESS  GRP(CAG)/ENV  CRTA  &  ASSESSAPPROl R  &  0

8.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C. E.   FY  80 INCR   FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          21.0         51.0           8.0         «6,0
 LEVEL              OPFT           4,0         20,0           8,0         16.0
02  OF ot)             FTE                        74.5          15. fl         71.3
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000.0)      7,500.0      7,617.5         721.0      4, 326.0
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

       Hazard Risk Assessment

           This level continues a new  initiative begun in 1979.  It will establish
       a baseline management framework to  oversee the development  of  guidelines
       and policy begun in FY 1979 for the Agency's various activities in  health
       risk assessment.  The program was established in response to an Admini-
       strator's directive of March 1978.   At  this level of resources only a
       partial response to the total need  can  be provided.  With 8  positions there
       was created a director's office,  planning officer, and a functional cap-
       ability to develop guidelines for the Agency's needs in exposure assessment.
       The exposure assessment group with  5 positions will finish  the 1979 effort
       to develop Agency guidelines and  procedures for conducting  exposure analysis
       and have a capability to review a small number of exposure  evaluations for
       the program offices.   The review  effort would be targeted at 20 assessments
       out of a potential requirement  for  150.

       Criteria Development  and Effects  Assessment

       Air:  One additional  air health hazard  assessment will be initiated to
       support the OANR efforts to investigate hazardous pollutants.

       Water;  Work will be  initiated  to develop aquatic and health criteria for
       1 additional new pollutant from the OWWM list of 41.

       Impact:  This funding level continues activities begun in FY 1979 to
       address Agency needs  in hazard  assessment specifically in the  area  of
       exposure.   A failure  to  fund this level will stifle this program initiative
       which was  called for  by  an Administrator's directive in March  1978.  The
       topic of exposure is  of  key importance in the Agency's ability to accurately
       evaluate and regulate hazardous pollutants.  A review of ongoing policy,
       and a specification  of uniform  methodology is of vital importance to
       1979 programs and will certainly  carry over into the expanded  Agency
       intiatives in 1980.
  EPA Form 2410-H (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

      2} DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
    DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND  CODE          HD       MEDlAt
   10  CARCINGN  ASSESS  GRPCCAG5/ENV  CRTA  & ASSESSAPPROj R  & D
• *»**•» •> •» • V V (• W W W • • w •! • V • • •VftPMWMMflt • • M M M ^ M M M • ^ ^ ^ M M • M M  M      ^
B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 78 ACT FY 79 C.  E.  FY  60 INCR    FY 80  CU*
         POSITIONS  PFT          21.0         51.0          5.0         51.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           4.0         20.0          u.O         go.O
03  OF  06             FTE                        7U.5          8.2         79.5
    BUDGET  AUTH.  cooo.o)     7,500.0      7,617.5        aei.o      «,eo7,o

      C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
       Criteria Development and Effects Assessment

       Alr:   The  air  criteria and assessment  program  will increase  the number
       of  air health  hazard assessments by 3  and provide an evaluation of the
       state-of-art  of 4  selected scientific  topics which have  across the board
       relevance  to  the criteria documents and  scientific assessment program.  For
       example, evaluations of the following  topics may be candidate:  precusors
       tc  acid rain,  precursors to oxidant formation,  and use  of dispersion
       models in  transport determinations. The selection of topics will be a
       jcint  OANR/ORD decision in mid FY 1979.

       Water:  This  level will provide an additional  capability to  develop health
       and  aquatic criteria for 3 new pollutants from the OWWM  list of 41.  At
       this level the cummulative capability  is 13 pollutants whereas the '1980
       requirement calls  for 26.

       Impact:  This  funding level provides an  incremental boost in the quality
       and  quantity  of effort devoted to  the  air criteria and assessment program.
       The  quality of the air assessment  outputs is improved because at levels 1
       and  2  the  air  assessment program is conducted  entirely on a  contractual
       basis  which is not judged to be a  satisfactory  approach.  By incorporating
       level  3 resources,  inhouse manpower of about 1/2 MY per  assessment is
       allocated  in  addition to the provision of more  hazard assessments.

       The  development of criteria documents  and the  conduct of scientific assess-
       ments  reveals  that the Agency concentrates on  documenting the effects while
       bouncing in and out of secondary  scientific considerations like, precursors,
       the use of modeling as a predictive tool, etc.   A state-of-art review for
       these  and other topics is a very desirable product from  the standpoint of
       sharpening the quality of effects  assessment and providing a uniform
       understanding of the background  issues and facts. ORD is proposing to
       evaluate four of these topics in  1980.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM £s DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
• -.- — -............„.».. -«——•..................„.
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          HQ       MEDIAt  TNTRn
H110 CARCINGN ASSESS GPP(CAS)/ENV CRTA &  ASSESSAPPRoJ  R  & D
0« OF  08             FTE                       jn5          -  0          *0'0
   BUDGET AUTH.  (QOO.O)     7,500.0      7,617^        Z*l'.l       5,099,'o

   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     Hazard Risk Assessment

     Cancer Assessment Group:  The CAG will continue  its operational capability
      to review assessments done by others and on an as needed basis, conduct
     evaluations and assessments of risk for the program offices. Each program
     office has a different mix of review versus conduct requirements.

     The outputs will increase by 50% with the  CAG able to match the total
     projected Agency need for 250 units of work activity.

        Pesticides:   -  review and or develop  32 assessments
        Toxics:       -  review 28 pollutant assessments
        Water Supply: -  review and or develop  11 assessments
        Water Quality: -  review and or develop  23 assessments
        Air:           -  conduct 26 pollutant assessments
        Regions:      -  perform risk evaluations for  6 special problems

     Impact;   The CAG is  fulfilling a leadership role  in the Agency assessment
     of cancer risk.   The 1978, anticipated 1979, and  projected 1980 requirements
     for methodology  development and operational capability reaffirms  the 1980
     need for an Agency inhouse staff of 19 PFT's.  A  reduced staffing allowance
     would have to  be matched with decreased service to the program offices
     which in turn  stifles the decision process  for planned regulatory initiative
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

CDRM  2t DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
    DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ        MEDJAi  INTRDPL
 110  CARCINGN ASSESS GRPCCAG)/ENV CPTA & ASSESSAPPROj  R  & D
•»•»• ••••• mmmmmmmmmmm^m^mmmmm "»»~m^mmmmmmmmmm»*'~mmm~*mmm~*'mmmm»»mmmm»m
B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  76 ACT  FY 79 C.  E.   FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          21.0          51.0           7.0         66.0
                     OPFT           il.o          ?0.0           1.0         21.0
05  OF 06             FTE                        7«.5           5.9         93.4
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     7,500.0      7,617.5        556.0      5,655.0
    C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

      Hazard Risk Assessment

          The  expanded  initiative in hazard  assessment that was established
      in level 2 and increased in level 4  is bolstered with the establishment,
      using 6  positions, of an assessment  capability in  reproductive health
      effects  specifically; mutagenesis, teratogenesis and sterility.   The  group
      will complete Agencywide guidelines  for assessing  the risk of  reproductive
      effects  from exposure to chemical agents that was begun in 1979.   As  these
      are completed a limited oversight activity will be undertaken  to  review the
      assessments done  by other program offices.

          Also,  one position is provided to  serve  as a health policy advisor to
      coordinate and advocate Agencywide health issues.  This is in  response to a
      request  from the  Administrator.

      Criteria Development and Effects  Assessment

      Water;   This level provides a capability to  develop health and aquatic
      criteria for 2 additional pollutants from the OWWM list of  41.

      Impact:  In part  this level continues  to expand the centralized hazard
      assessment capability of the Agency  as  called for in the Administrators
      directive.  In ZBB tradition this is the next service level and priority
      area for development. Reproductive effects,  as a basis for  regulatory
      actions  is following cancer as an area  for immediate concern.
 EPA Form 2410-1 ) (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  <>i DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ       MEDJAt  I
H110  CARCINGN ASSESS GRP(CAG)/ENV C^TA &  ASSESSARPROl  R  & D
B.  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78  ACT  FY 79' C.  E.   F Y8o
         POSITIONS   PFT          21.0          51.0           2,0          68ao
 LEVEL              OPFT           4.0          20.0                        21*0
07  OF  08             FTE                        74.5           1.7          95.1
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000. 0)     7,500.0      7,617.5        351.0      6,006,0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

      Hazard Risk Assessment

          The small exposure assessment function in level 2 is expanded with
      2 positions and extramural dollars.   The level  2 resources are almost
      totally consumed  in overseeing the development  of agency policy and
      guidelines  such that only a very small allowance can be made for reviewing
      assessments.  This level expands the group's capability to review and
      conduct  as  necessary exposure assesments for the program offices.  The
      resources will  permit an expansion of from 20 to 70 units of activity.

          The  reproductive effects assessment program in  level 5 is also expanded
      to provide  a  greater operational capability to  conduct reviews and provide
      Agencywide  oversight.  The resources will  permit an expansion of from
      approximately 20  to 70 units of output i.e., assessment reviewed.

      Impact:   A  satisfactory review capability  for the exposure and reproductive
      assessment  groups could not be incorporated in  an earlier level.  Although
      the first priority need is to establish uniformity and quality control with
      Agencywide  guidelines it is also  important to conduct a review function of
      sufficient  magnitude to insure that  the highest quality of exposure analysis
      is produced.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------





















2
CS

V
z cr
o <
—. r
UJ CO
O UJ
cc u
CL o:
_l C
« CO
2 ft
UJ
X •-
2 •-
O 2
C —
> Z
Z O
UJ "-i
to
•o •—
UJ U
H- UJ
f. C. —
>- 0
A "" 4
f^ ^
c uj
UJ i «-
^- ft wn
z u. u
X €0
CO
<

me
H-
c
u
z
UJ

»- cs
UJ U
a CL
C ft
_, cs
> CO
b>? co
C UJ
CO
*t CD
•r
I.: Z
ft CS
<. 2
UJ —

UJ CC
ft «
U
<
< o
V-
tu X



a
c
o-


cc
e> *-*
— m
UJ

X
**
*~

nj e
c z

— r
•z.
_i

cc
O1






uj
>
o *-
cc •«
fr «l
r
2
tj


2
UK'
o a:
CD toJ
er- ic
«-.  e
o o o o— a
o cr ~ in nj
in »>- ^- »»
*-*~in*





0
o
o ^
M *- U. UJ
O < e> CL O it
• uj) e o w*«
u. X to r- e
O •- =» IT •> —

— « x tr z
o ^- to o
»- Z X >• "•
_) UJ ~- UJ < >-
UJ O ^ ^^ t •<
> O f— CO
uj 3 r> c
— J CC OB.

o a
• •

e\j c-

a Ki
03-
* rn
cu cr
Kl (C
^ ^
a KI

e a
« •
•C Kl
m cr

^ ^
a KI
o a
•& Kl
fW tf
Kl tD
^ ^
a K>



o cc rv a e c KI
^ Kl #V Kl ^ i£ w
cu eo a e- a — r-
K» »•- in cc
cr — rv KI





o n» ce> o- o o a
tw in < a —
»»• a «w «






m co ^- cc o o in
•- «v a in — o a
— a t^ m m «\» »^
*C tWK» CD
^ » * -*
?*• m f\t *t;


o o o o o e
o o o o— «r
e cr ~ in «v
in »- ^- »~
^— Ift*





o
e
e •-
^ ^- U-«fcl
0 -< Oft. OU.
••UJ ft C <->**
u. X co D o
O «- 3 X •» —

rv « X ft 2
C »- CO O
t- 2 X >-<—
_J UJ *^ UJ "^ ^
UJ ts ^* ^ — J **
> e »- «
UJ = => O
_J CC DC.

0 Kl
• •
f- -C
c cu
CC Kl
a a
o -*n
r*. o
O AJ
CC Kl
* «
a a

O Kl
• •
f- X
e • o o n
CC €> f*-^*\
a «*» fw a






mcct-cc o oin
f^. n> a ir> •» e a
— a r-> m m «v ^*
^ fW Kl CC
^ * ^ ^
»•- «n c\i •£


o o e o e o
e o o o — a
o o «• m tu
en »».^^.
t~ —mx





e
e
0 •-
n ^- u, tu
c « o o. o u.
•UJ ft C ^"^
L. X co =» e
O >- O X «* —
n o « — co
K>< X ft 2
O t- CO O
•- Z X >- •—
_J uj ~ UJ < •-
UJ CS *•* *^ _> **
> e ^-05
UJ 3 => O
_J C CO.

O -«
• »
o- o-
c- c
c in
in a
0 —
o- o-
o- cc
o in
• •
in a

e —
• •
c- *•
Cr cc
o in
* «
m a
0 —
er tr
Cr «
o m
^ •
in a



o a ^ ^ & o in
c- o cc er er o r-
cr tu r- cc in ni co
e> twee in
in tu tw a





o a o cc e e
rv o — fu «c e
fV tV. (V






m cc ^»cc e e in
>» «u a in — cs a
— • a »~ in in t\i t»
< tu KICC
• •» • ^
r- in tu*


o x> oo o o
c o o o «• e
o o- —in tw
in »•» r*. »•»•
•»»in«





o
o
o *-
•t *- u, UJ
O « C CL C U.
• ID tr e •- w
u. X v>=: o
o *- n x « —
D O ««-«'>
a< x ft 2
e »- co o
•- Z x >- ».
— 1 UJ —UJ < *-
UJ CS «^ ^^ «l t-«
> c »- co
UJ ^ X O
•JC C CL

o in
• •
in o-
in cc
•C 0
in in
o in
m er
in cc
•fl 0
» *
m in

o m
• •
in er
in co
X 0
 co «v a o
•c er ^ o r*
in in cr o
in KI — in






in cc *- «D e»
r-. tu a in —
— a »» m in
o tvmcc
• • * ^
^ in tu *


o o o o o
o o o o »
o o- — in tu
in r~ r~ r-
i^— in «





o
c
0
«•» >-
CC *"^ ^£ ^^ U.
C •« C CL
• UJ ft C
u. x co =• e
o ~ 3 x «* -—
:> o-« «- er>
in < x ft 2
o »- co o
fc. r >c >- •-.
_> UJ •> UJ •< •-
uj cs ^ ** —t tart
> C *- CO
UJ S S o
_l CC O 0.
^
r*
I
Kl
1
er
o













































































0
-------
u
z
UJ
IS
z a.
o <
"-> Z
•- r
u =i
ui tn
_j  o
«  CO
r-  UJ
z  tr
UJ
x  •-
z  «•
o  z
e  5

>  z

UJ  ~
    en
CO •—
UJ  U
»•  UJ
«  c    -»~
*-        o
O        UJ
UJ X     <-
^ ft     CO
»0     <0
2 U.     UJ
=>        *>
      Z «
      UJ U
      X <-
      n. tv
      O C£
      _l (9

      > 10
      UJ CO
      O '1'
         cc
      ^ en

      X
      u z
      cc u
      •<• z
      UI —
      W u
      UJ E
      a <
         u
      «M  X
                CO

                — CD
                ni c:
                CD Z
                   UJ
                   >

                O »-
                CO f
                a- _i

                   x

                   u
                o- a
                — u
                ~" £
                   u
                                             •o
                                             o
                                                       9

                                                       in
                                                       in
                                                       o
                                             •o        in
                                             o        o
                                             e        9
                                             «
                                             o
                                             o
                                                       in
                                                       o
                                                       9
O >- «  o o
                                               t IV "*V CD

                                                m «\»«
                                             O O O O — 9
                                             c o » vt <\i
                                             o
                                             e
                                                          *• u. uj

                                                       o a o u.
                                          U. Z «"-  3 O



                                          r- « X  IT    S
                                          O        )- CO O
                                             »- Z  X >- «
                                                      s c
                                                      o a
-------
o
•z.
UJ
U
UJ
I-
o
£E
a.
Z  >-

I
    00

    C/3
UJ
    UJ
    5
    I
    c/
    U
    U
    Z
    O

    M

    O
    UJ
    Q

en
•H
T3
CU
AJ C,
t"~ ! e~*

.. a.°
< O
LJ £_
S <



c
Bi
O

O
O LU




O
""'
MM

05
C
Q)

cn
cn
01
cn
CO

u
"M
•H
C
o>
•H
U
to





LU
D
O
o
O

^
LU
™-
h-
H
Z
D
2
o

C/5
U
LU
O
<





CO
r-
Z
LU
C/3
O
U
o
LU
K
<
—,
*Z

O
OS
r-
U.





_J
LU
LU
_J
H
«J
UJ

UJ
-4
_j
LU
^
UJ
_J
•1
_i
LU

UJ
-*
j
LU

LU
_J
^
_J
LU
LU
_l
r~
CT) — )'
„ O
> a.
U. C.

LU
r-
» S

U- LU





UJ
rr
MEASIH
cB
LU
_J
H
'
r-
Z
LU
I
•J
n.
2
o
U
0
CQ

O
CM




O
CM


O
CM




O
rH



0
rH


O
1-1


O
CM





m
iH


m
-1




in
rH


m
rH




CO




CO



CO



m
rH





ro
rH


o
rH




o
rH


o
rH




m




m



m



o
rH





<»•



CN
r-




CN
r-


CN




v£>




VD



vO



CM
rH





00



CTN





C^



cr\




cn




in
n







r^
rH



^
rH


r~.
rH


in
f"!













sO



0




m




m



m



^D










O
>3-




O
-a-


o
-a-




o
rH



VA->
rH


\D
rH


O
^J-





m



CN
!—




CN
r—


^




m




in



m



CN]
r-J





m
rH


(—,
CN




O
CM


CM




CM
rH



CM
rH


CM
rH


rH






rH



O





O



0




O




C



o



o






r-i
r— 1


rH





r—
o


•a-




CM
CM



CM
CM


CM
CM


in
^^





O
CM


CS





CN
r-


CN




vO




tf>



VO



CM
rH





m



rH





rH



rH




rH




rH



O



rH

O





o
CM


O
CM

•


O
CM



0
CM


O



c
f*^





0







































o










CO
c
CO CO CO O
co en c en i-i
co a) o) o C J->
• C CO CO -H O TO
03 O CO CO CO AJ iH 3
3 03 -H < < 60 CO AJ  0) AJ 0)3 AJ CO CO
•H co co co J^^pi 
> 3 CO rH COtO CO AJ AJ 0) CO rH 0)0)
0> 0) < 3 -H i-l «« >B CE iH « CU
« -H OD Pi OS W 0> 0) M pi >• CO)
>j«iO) 0) EEco W -H ^
Pi rH 01 CO Oi -tfino) Jsi CO COO) AJ 0> rH 3
< co pi -r-i c coco coco u EMCUCO
r_5 R* AJ pi > CC-H -HOI cu cn 3 o> 3 -a O
^ pi 4J 01 0) O O rH Pi CO CO ^ *C rH CO *H Cu
OI3"OrH-H -H-Hfl) CO CO C ,OO3X
0)J3-HrH> AJAJTJ >s < •<>> O O ftOCV
l-iO)r-l3a) O J T-I M |_i O AJ U X
BJ Di CO b Bi 0)0)3 CO ^ ^.J^CO C B- W p^, S
•H -H >J-H -H 4J E rH S -H
SSS EBirHIQiE'HSCO CO 0) >
to
CU
•o

0
-iH
AJ
CO
0)
B-
0)0)0) -H CXiHiHOICO -H MO)
^H-H-H rHrH O.rH'H tO-HO) CJ >> OlrH 3rHO) 3>CO 0) ^^
0)0)0) W3 to s u o* 01 to cn a c. AJ
K K CZ B- fcu fa. BM Bi < C CO OU
l-i U O rH 3
0) 0) -H 0) T).
W rJ i-l AJ M > C
H «H CC « 0) 0) 0
o < & s PS a 0



















































CO
r-
eo
•
o
<«r
-------
o
2
UJ
u
LU
H
o
CC
a.
h-
Z  >
LU  c;
o
CC

>
E  D
    C/5
UJ
    UJ

    S
    X
    oo
    O
    u
    o

    co
    U
    UJ
    O
    u.
*
•
en
TJ
co
4-IQ
M OS

.. o.
< 0
o £
LU £
2 <




o
o


o
O LU




X


CO
e
i
CO
CD
CO
CO
CO
**«
u
•H
U-l
•H
CO
,.,j
u
w


^_
LU
O
O
o
Q
Z
^
^-"
LU
_J
r-
H
H-
Z
3
CISION
UJ
C

^






CO


LU
CO
2
O
U
O
LU
H

— j
3
5

u
o
CO
en
^
u.






"^
LU

UJ
_J

_|
UJ

LU
X
_j
LU
^
UJ
_l
1
_J
LU
>
LU
_J
j
LU

LU
_|
j
UJ
LU
J

en

en -,•
"~ O
> er
U. Q.

UJ
en 2
> CO
U. UJ
UJ
EC
3
CO
^
UJ
UJ

t-
^
^
^
HMEN
C/3
:COMPLI
"^
^

03







,_,



"
0




O





o











r-l




O




f*^



o
CN



O




o





o



o







o
1""



o



o




o




o




o





o
















o


4-1
4-1 cn C
C en u co
eo -, 4-1 U
u u u co
CO C 3 HJ
14-1 £0 C U
w < o
u cj
eo o.~~. i-l
> o 3 C
•H IH eo o
jj eo 1-1 i-i
CJ > > f.
3 co eo o
•O Q CSS
O V4
)_, u
0. f.
CO -U
PS O

U




o




o




o





o



o












o








in




m




in





in











CN




^








f>




ro




tn





m











CN




m








CO




CO




co





m











r-»




CN



i— 1




1-4.




rH




r— 1





iH



iH







rH




O








H



m
f— 4




O
r— H


CT\







in
>J3



O



m
rH



m




m
r-l



cn
r— |




O



"eK







m
vO



o








o




o




o





o



o







o




o






























^
M
i
^























m
m
^











cn cn
4-1 cn c
C eo tn en o
0) 4-1 4-1 4J TH
E « c e jj
CO ^J3 ^) (fi OJ Cfl
in o, cn S co g 3
co 3 c w eo cn 4J
cn co o cn cn cn t-i
coco bO-Hcocnco cn
C < w cn < cn ta
•H cneocn cn -H to c
i-t w UfH-> 4J^H-r4O*eOn W3C3.U Ln
DO) -H Vj Vj •< c. 4J O O* 
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
:ORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
                            Hi,]
HQ  ORD
REG.
            MED1A:
Interdisp
 B) LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES


         The Technical  Information program orovides the latest scientific
    *nd engineering information,  in an  efficient format,  to environmental
    enforcement-,  design/engineerina, management and decision-making officials.
    This information, most of which is  aathered and synthesized from research
    performed  by  the Office <~>f  Research anrf Development,  is pac-kaned »ccord-
    ina to nser reauirements.   Output from the Technical Information-program
    includes design manuals,  guidance documents,  national,  recrional and local'
    seminars,  executive summary documents and Dublications  control.
  C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

          Major IY 1978  accomDlishments included the following publications:
     Industrial Handbook for Air Pollution Control,  Design Manual for Tand
     Treatment-  of wasrewater,  Desion Manual for the  Landfillina of Sludge
     which was  developed in conjunction with the Office of Solid Waste.   Major
     seminar series were "resented throughout the United States and covered
     the  following subjects:   pretreatment of industrial effluents,  treatment
     of small waste flows,  control of nollution from irrigation return flows,
     pollution  control in the  asnhalt industry,  lake restoration (in conjunc-
     tion with  the Office of Water Programs), and biodeqradation (in conjunc-
     tion with  the Office of Pesticides Programs).
  D) FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

         During IY  1979,  the Technical Information Program will continue to
    provide tailored publications, manuals  and seminars for its user community,
    and will shift  toward greater reliance  on the EPA Recrions and Program
    offices for the selection  of topics and information formats.    A major
    new initiative  will be the establishment and operation of a small flows
    information clearinghouse  as required bv Section 104 of the IS 77 Clean
    Water Act Aimendments.   In additon, the Research Highlights and Research
    Outlook reports will  >^e produce^  for Congress.    A npnual on sludge
    control will be produced,  and a number  of seminars will be conducted
    focusing on innovative alternative municipal wastewater treatment tech-
    nology  and  industrial wastewater  nretreatment.    Also,  a project-level
    research status information system will be develcoed to provide more
    efficient access to the details of EPA's research and development efforts.
 EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  l\ DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         HQ        MEOIA|  JNTROPL
H115  TECHNICAL  INFORMATION-INTEROISCP            APPRDj  R &  D

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY 80  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          27.0          31.0          24.0          24.0
 LEVEL              OPFT           6.0          12.0           6.0           6,0
01 OF  08             FTE                        48.1          36.1          56.1
   BUDGET  AUTH,  (000.0)     4,800.0      3,422,0      2,567.0       2,567.0
   C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
                                                                            t

       Activities

            Funding  at this level maintains the Technical Inforrnation oroaram
       operating *nd overhead cost*! and continue* support, for a '-en-f-rai iz/^d
       publications manafrement/distribution control.  It also maintains the
       quality control function for the research oroject status system that
       allows access to information on nearlv 3,000 active EPA research projects.
       Finally,  this level provides for the nroduction of an annual Research
       Highlights report and the Congressionally mandated Research Outlook
       reoorts.


       Benefits;

            - assures the public availability of ORB'S research rerorts through
       centralized report processing.
            - Assures the availability of  accurate, up-tc—date information on
       on-going  EPA  research projects.
            - Achieves economics of scale  through centralized orovision of
       support for oublications orocessina,  report production and seminar
       presentation.
            - Provides ORD-wide quality-ron-f-rolleri resoonse to Congressionally
       mandated  report.


       Consequences of not funding;

            -Loss of coordinated technical/riBnaaement information capability.
            -S^vei-e  setback to o"tput-oriented research effort.
            -Deprive EPA reqions,  PrcTar  of^ic^s of Technical  Information
       transfer  capability within ORD — subsequent lack of accurate technical
       information to key design/engineering and environmental management
       individuals at state and ify-ai levels.
            -Probable net increase in overall resources required due to dis-
       persion of essential services among the various ORD and EPA offices —
       resulting in  redundancy and/or inefficient use of resources.
          uu:
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION! AGENCY

CORM  2; DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 ,  DECISION UNIT TITLE AND  CODE          HO       MEDlAj  INTRDPL
HIIS  TECHNICAL  INFORMATI.ON-INTERDISCP            APPRO.-  R  g, D
^VV4VW***BflPVW4PB IV •• » • v tf M 0 9 • 9 ^ W • V • •• *> M •• W M • M w •> V • V M M M • W •» M W M • ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^    ^ ^ ^ ^
B,  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 76 ACT FY  79 C.  E. ' FY 80  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         27.0         31.0           3.0          27.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          6.0         12.0           fc.O          12.0
02  OF  08             FTE                       flS.l          10.0          46.1
    BUDGET  AUTH.  COOO.O)     U,800.0      3,422.0      1,250.0      3,817.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
      OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

       Activities
            This funding increment allows the Technical Information program to
       continue *~o produce °penially ^ailorfid desion manuals, seminars  and execu-
       tive rerorts to provide the latest technical and scientific data to the
       nation's environmental engineering, management and decision-makina
       comnunitv.   Specifically,  this funding supports the small  wastewater flows
       information clearinghouse as required bv Section 104 of the 1977 Clean
       Water Act Ammendments, provides  for the production and distribution nf a
       design manual on enerqy conservation in municipal waste treatment fin
       noniunction with the Office of Water Program Operations)  and a procedures
       manual on analyzing organic comoounds in water.  In addition, seminar/
       workshops will be conducted nationwide, in conjunction with the  EPA regions
       and/or program offices, on such  topics as:  combined sewer overflow control
       toxic and hazardous materials control,  inorganic chemicals industry
       pollution control,  pollution control in agriculture (with USDA),  upgrading
       municipal treatment technologies  to meet IPDWR/RPDWR requirements,
       pollution control in the  foundary industrv and small wastewater  treatanent
       systems.
       Benefits:
            -Allows Technology Transfer Prooram to participate as full  partner
       with EPA regions and program offices in providing for efficient  technical
       information transfer.
            -Provides direct ORD technical information  transfer to state, and
       local environmental regulators, EPA p-nag^-am ^ff-ice^ su<-to ac th<=>  Of^icr-
       of Water Planning and Standards  and the Office of Water Program  Operations.
            -Allows for significant effort to be conducted to provide technical
       information aimed at regional, state and local air pollution control
       officials.
            -Provides for  rapid  synthesis and transfer of relevant EPA  scientific
       and  technical information directly to the consulting scientists  and engineer^
       upon which most comnunities depend for analyses of air and water pollution
       control needs and techniques.  -
       Consequences of not funding;
            -Failure to exploit  existing technical information transfer capabili-
       ties.
            -Dispersion and lack of coordination of technical and scientific
       communications efforts among the various ORD and EPA operating arms with
       resultant decline in efficiency and loss of effective integration of
       information producers with information users.
            -Inability to  support adequate level of activity to provide viable
       small flows  information clearinghouse as mandated by Congress.
            -Significantly poorer technical information support to state and   (JUi
       iocal officials upon whom much of the burden for enforcing environrental
  EPA Form 2410-11 (&-7S)
-------
                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 2: DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS          .-
  A.  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)


  TECHNICAL PJPORMaTTON   (H1151
                    HQ ORD      MEDIA: Interdisp.

                    REG.         APPRO:
  B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY
FY 78 ACTUAL  FY 79 C. EST.   FY 80 INCR.
FY 80 CUM.
LEVEL
	 OF 	

POSITIONS PFT
OPFT
FTE
BUDGET AUTH. (000.0)
















  C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  Consequences of not furling  (contd):
                                                                            i
  statutes.  Consequences may  include decisions  to use  out-noded techniques
  and  less effective/more wasteful  alternatives  to analyse and control
  pollution.
            JUC3
EPA Form 2410-1 1 (8-78)
-------



















z
u
^
>.
z cc
o •<
«- X
»- z
U 3
*-
c uj
tx u
a c
_l C
« en
*~ UJ
Z Ct

r •-
z -•
o z
> z
z o
UJ «-«
CO
CO —
UJ l_>
*"• UJ
* c
0
uj z
»- ec
Z U.
X



CL
en
*«
IT
tu
^
Z
*v »*
2 1
UJ Z
X O
a —
Of
UJ X
UJ O
a u.
z
•e —
X _l
o <
tr o
* •—
u z
to x
m »^
Ct UJ
*"•
4c£
< in
»*•
^D -^"
rx.x

a
CO
"


cc
O* *•*
-• «o
£
^i
X.
en
UJ
ni u
cc z
o* ••*
— z
«
CL

cc
tr
!*•




UJ
„
O f-
cc «
„ 3
r
^
u

-
UJ
0 £
CO UJ
o or
«• (_;
Z


fcv
O- UV
^.
c- c
— c
n


-i
»•- 3
C* f
•" U
•^

























o o
f~ CC
* cc
in a
tu —
0 C>
r-T cc*
•c cc
in s?
ni —


o e-
• •
r^ cc
•e cc
tn »
M —

O O
^ cc
•e cc
in t»
% »
rv —


e c o e» o o —
^ tn rw cc o * ^
* -« in cc «v KI
in CD f- a
A) — —




0 O O O- O O —
r- tn iv cc a? ^ *
* —* in CD Aj P«I
m CD f*- 9
* » »
rw — v



o co m tc o o —
rxj ir f- e — rvi cc
rw o -• co •*> — < a
e o e e-
^ ^ ^ «
••% IV — —


o e o o e e
e « a tr ^ *
e ^- »»eo iv
CC1 •*f> 9 •*
* » «
a a iv






^^
e
o
0 »-
«o ~ _>~«u a. *•
c < o o, o u.
• uj ec o w »-.
M. X *n * C2
D •- => T W ~
^ O * ^ BO
— < X «r z
C H- CO O
>- Z x >- —
_J UJ w U^ ^ **
Uj CS *«^ ^* _> "^
> O •- CO
UJ 2 S C
_1 CC O O.
0 0-
rl ^
v« «M
ec «v
KI A..
C D-
»-' «
»• ••
ec m
W IV


c »•

p*- f\
•• ••
cc ru
fl IV

e o-
>-^ *!
•• w
co nj
» k
**> IV


c c o o- o e —
r~ irt iv ro r>-  o o»n •»> * o
tn e> tniv —
fu rj o f-
^ ^
^ «•



C «D IVCD O O —
IV 0 »- 4E> « fU fO
fu e> «• co *t •*« 9
«r e. « e^
^ » « ^
»fll\t— —


o o o o o e
o * «r «• »- .*>
O f*» IV CD IV
co fi e- ««.
•» » ^
o o m






.»»
e
e
o »
€D'" «>^» U, O. •-
C « 0 CL C U.
•• UJ CC O ^< w
b. X en r> o
0 •- S X •> —
^ O « ^- CO
M « z a z
o •- a> o
t- Z x >- —
1 tt 1 MM tl 1 ^ 1^
w c? *•* *^ ^ ^*
> c i- eo
uj r. => o
_J CC CO.
-------
z
LLJ
Z
o

h-
o
UJ
t-
O
o:
a.
yj be
z £

^z
   UJ
   2
   X
   CO
   O
   O
   O
   Z
   g
   C/5

   u
   UJ
   Q
   'CC
   O
   u.
       CU
       en
      •H


      i
       < O
       Q£
       UJ Q.
       2 <
      a uj
      X CC
E
              UJ
              111
r-
•z.
UJ
5
x
CO
3
a.
s
o
u
o
<

CD
                                                                        in
       O
       O
                        o
                        o
                        CO
o
o
o
9
o
s
o"g°5    B'       "8^ 8 "8
S p. «w 3    M-Ho5    Mr-iQjN
P^&OCJj    CUrO-P   Gj(OK-H
-------An error occurred while trying to OCR this image.
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HQ          MEDIA: Interdisp

  Federal Activities/EIS Review-Air  (H  210)          REG-  X      APPRO:  A>  & c>
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
    To ensure  that  all Federal  agencies,  under  Executive  Order  11752,  comply
 with Federal, State,  interstate,  and  local  substantive standards  and  limita-
 tions for  the prevention  and control  of  environmental pollution.   This  can
 be accomplished  through early  identification of  problems,  assistance  in
 obtaining  funding,  technical assistance,  and enforcement actions,  as
 necessary.
    Compliance with  requirements under Section  309  of the Clean Air Act  and
 the National  Environmental Policy Act to  ensure  that proposed  actions of
 other Federal agencies do not  adversely  impact the quality of  the  environment
 This can be accomplished  through  timely  and thorough reviews,  pre-draft and
 pre-final  liaison,  technical assistance,  and referrals,  as necessary, to  CEQ.

  C  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
    In Federal facilities  compliance,  primary emphasis was  on ensuring
 adherence  to  consent  declarations and delayed  compliance orders by noncomply-
 ing Federal facilities.   Increased efforts were  directed toward improving the
 effectiveness and timeliness of air new  source reviews and coordination with
 the EIS review process.  The major emphasis was  on EPA assistance  to other
 Federal agencies to integrate  effective environmental planning with basic
 programmatic  decision-making processes on major  energy,  transportation, and
 other development projects that might otherwise  have caused severe air
 pollution or other environmental harm.  Revised  EIS review guidelines on
 highway projects have been drafted.
  D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

    In Federal facilities compliance, primary emphasis will continue to be on
 negotiating delayed compliance orders with noncomplying Federal facilities and
 ensuring adherence to the July 1979 statutory deadline.  The increased State
 rcle under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 will necessitate substantial
 EPA interaction with the States.  Also, emphasis will be focused on helping
 Federal agencies budget for pollution abatement projects.  No significant
 change in the regional EIS review activity from the current year is antici-
 pated.  However, the budget reduction for FY 1979 will result in a substantial
 reduction of headquarters input on air quality impact reviews.  The major
 regional emphasis will be on pre-draft impact statement liaison and pre-final
 impact statement consultation.  Revised EIS review guidelines on highway
 projects will be finalized and issued.  Work will begin on EIS review guide-
 lines on nuclear power plants, airports, impoundments, and channelizations.
                                                                      J'»'  ' •
                                                                      Uv
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
                                   PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2$ DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         RG        MEDIA,  JNTRDPL
H210  FEDERAL ACTIVITIES/EIS  REVIEW-AIR           APPROi  A &  C

B.  RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79  C.  F. .   FY BQ  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT          33.0          22.0          17.0          17.0
 LEVEL              OPFT                         1.0           1.0           1.0
01  OF  07             FTE                        28.9          20.9          20,9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)        760.0         S^a.3        453.3         "53.3
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


     Federal Facilities Compliance - Emphasis will be placed on identification of
     problems, encouragement of funding and enforcement actions as  necessary.
     Some technical assistance  provided.  Minimal inspection activity and only on
     Class A Federal facilities.  Funding this base level will  place greater
     responsibilities on Federal  facilities.  Compliance with applicable rules
     and r egulations will primarily  be  voluntary  for other than the limited
     Class A sources inspected.   Ability  to assure adherence to compliance
     schedules will be limited  to the Class A sources.   Not funding this level
     would drastically impact the implementation of E.O. 11752  and  compliance with
     Section 118 of the Clean Air Act.  Control would be lost at the Federal level
     and Federal facility compliance would be largely dependent upon whatever
     actions, if any, State  or  local agencies decided to implement.

     EIS 309 Review - Timely and  thorough review of all EIS's will  not be achieved
     Cursory pre-draft and pre-final liaison performed with no  post-EIS follow-up.
     None or very little technical assistance provided.  Only significant
     referrals.  EPA will marginally carry out functions mandated under Section
     309 of the Clean Air Act and NEPA.  Not funding this level will preclude EPA
     from compliance with the legislative mandates.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

FOR*  25 DECISION  UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS
 .  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          RG       MEDIA-  INTRDPL
H2io  FEDERAL  ACTIVITIES/EIS REVIEW-AIR          APPRO-  A  8,  c

B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 76  ACT  FY  79 C.  E.  FY  80  INCR   FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          33.0          22.0           5.0         22,0
 LEVEL              OPFT                         l.o           1,0          2,0
02  OF 07             FTE                        28.«           4,0         2«.9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)        760.0        5U4.3        103.9        557,2
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

     Federal Facilities Compliance - Slight increase  in  technical assistance on
     needs, plans and specifications.  Additional and more thorough inspections.
     Funding this level will  provide the minimum acceptable level of staffing to
     assure compliance by Federal facilities.   Not funding this level would result
     in limited ability to  assure that Federal facilities are complying with the
     Clean Air Act and implementation of E.O.  11752.

     EIS 309 Review - Number of timely reviews  will be increased.  Increased pre-
     draft and pre-final liaison.  Post-EIS follow-up will be provided.  Funding
     this level will provide  the minimum acceptable level of staffing to assure
     that functions mandated  under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and NEPA are
     carried out.  Not funding could result in the Agency concurrently approving
     and disapproving a project due to lack of liaison activities.
                                                                   30CQ
  EPA Form 2410.11 (8-78)
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  a; DECISION  U^IT LEVEL
A. DECISION  UNIT  TITLE AND  CODE          RG       MEDIA}  TNTRDPL
H2io  FEDERAL  ACTIVITIES/EIS REVIEW-AIR           APPROI  A  & c

B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY        FY 78 ACT  FY 79  C. E.   FY flo  INCR    FY 80  CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         33.0          22.0           2,0          2«.0
 LEVEL               OPFT                        i.o                         2.0
03 OF  07            FTE                       2H.9           2.0          26.9
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (OOO.o)       760.0         5U4.3          52.0        609.2
    Enough pressure can be placed on Federal facilities to affect compliance
    levels.  Funding this level will provide an acceptable level of staffing  to
    assure compliance by most  Federal facilities.  Not funding this level will
    result in less than full compliance with Section 118 of the Clean Air Act
    and  less than full implementation of E.  0.  11752.

    EIS  309 Review - Timely and thorough review of all EIS's will be achieved.
    Provide technical assistance to other Federal agencies as requested.
    Funding this level will provide an acceptable level of staffing to assure
    compliance with Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and NEPA.   Not funding this
    level will mean that fewer EIS's submitted  will be of acceptable quality
    resulting in more referrals to CEQ.
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


    federal Facilities Compliance - Additional and more thorough  inspections.
                J,">f
                U!'.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------

a
cc
t>
*•

^i
•c
^ ^™*
»- CO
UJ
^
<
*••
CD
UJ

ec z
c- •«
— z
z
4t
_1
c.
>-
u
z
UJ —
C/x A
< c-
^- «•
z cr
o «
«- z
H- £
U =>
UJ 
» —
_i o o *••
« CD CC «
•- >u o- _i
z cr — S
UJ Z
I ^- O
z ~ u
C 2
IT =>
> Z «-
Zfc *V
w £
UJ *• fcu
05 OX
€O «•* O UJ
kU U O- C
< C Z
en ••
c
UJ £
N- er «-
*^ *"* eo
Z H. O UJ
=> f-
o cr
— g
u
c
<
1
3t _;
UJ CO «
•• f^ S
> e- «-
UJ — O
cr «
CT3
UJ
V.
CO
UJ
>
^«
»K
u

_l
«
to cr
Z UJ
0 0
i^ UJ
O u.
UJ
c c

^- fu
cr z
w -o
Kl —
in «v
a a
K> *
• •
OT »•
m r^i
9 9

•••» *
Kt w"
m nj
a 9



m *>
• •
in nj.
9 9







K> Kl * e O t>
Kl K\ — h- — C
tn tn «M — iv
99 9






••>••> .£ o c e»
KI »»i — r- — c
in in «\i •• «v
99 9





f^KI tV O O »
99 .£» OJ — «C
99 O CU fV
in in in


00 -CD 0
• • • •
O O •ft
o * o m
^» >» r.


c>
o
o •-
•• ^~ Ak. UJ
e « c o. o h_
• uj c: e »^»^
u. X to ^ e
S •- 2 I *» —
r> o « ~ t«
— < I or Z
e »— en c
»- 2 x >• ~
_i uj — uj «; >-
UJ (^ ^r «p^ ^ MM
> o *- to
UJ S SO
_J CC O C.
rvj ni
»- cc
m —
in in
IV IV
• %
>-. CD
tn —
in m

m » CO
in —
in in



nj ivi
• •
in —
in in







fu ni m o o o
f- >- co tu ru 9
in in — ni «v
in in in






. o- o- * o o o
p*» **i * in — 9
00 O
•• *•





•H l»> «V O O O
99 O «\) — CC
a a o «v ni
m m in


o o  «
•« X Of^
»^ r» ^


.^
e
o
o *-
4» •- U, UJ
^^ *•* ^J ^* u. c^ ^^
c < es tL o u.
-uJ er e> w ^>
u. x cc — o
S ^ 3 I •» -••
S O « ^^ CD
- —
*J UJ *• UJ ^ >-
UJ O -'•'_/ —
> C *- en
U => S Ci
-JCE c a
tv 0
t> «
0 *

t> o « o «v «
o o -f tv t\i
-* * in






o o e o o
ru ni CD TU »•%
•*>< ov\
r» »» »»


o
0
o «-
« (- u, UJ
^^ *^ ^^ ^^ \if ^. *^
0 « 0 IX Ota.
«UJ CC O «•* ^
u. X CO B o
o •• => r «* ••
s e< ^
••»•< S tr z
o *— en o
•- r >«>-«.
_JUJ — UJ < •-
UJ £5 »^ w _» ».
> Cs »- CO
UJ S SO
_Itt O O.
OCttl
-------
CJ
z
LU
O
<

2
g

H
o
UJ
h-
O
tr
a.
UJ
    CA

    H


    OJ

    S

    I
    CO
    u
    u
    z
    D

    Z
    g
    C/3

    o
    UJ
    Q
    cc
    o
    u.
I-l
cfl
C
•H
ex
- J
CJ
cn
i-l CJ
•o
M '-3
OJ

C <
< o
LU a.
s <




X
a LU
z cc



o"
r-H
s
•H
^
1
Ol
•H
01
*
C/3
M
w
CO
Ol
•H

•H
^
•H
4J
o
1— 1
CO
)"J
CJ
13
0)
LU
o
o
CJ
Q
•2.
^

UJ
-J
^
W-

H"
z
D
o
CO
o
LU
Q
<










CO
(-
2
LU
2
z
CO
a.
0
0
o
H
	 J
D
D
o
CO
Ol
r^
u.










LU
UJ
_j



I
UJ
LU


LU
^
LU
-1
LLJ
UJ
j
LU

LU

— 1
_J
LU
^
LU
""
cn
2 ->'
*^ o
> cc
u. a.


UJ
t-
s <
o S

.^ fr~
IX UJ




LU
lEASURI
5
LU
J
h-

r"
1-
2
LU
5
Z
CO
1
Q.
5
0
O
0
m

f
















m in m O ro
r^* CO f^» ON v^*
co

O O O O ft
~a- P~ 


o o o o m
i— i m CNI r-~ \o
PO


m in m o PI
r*^ co r**- r^» ^
ro






rn co in r*^ 'so
r*. r — p-» in r^
ft


m
C
J-l -H
O
jj to cn
14-1 « Ci) OJ
CO 3 i-l i-l
1-4 U C 4-1 4-1
TJ g 0 -H -H
01 iH OH 4J iH i-i
h 4J W CO CJ U
a. u A co
X O 0) 3
4j j-i cn i— i — ' .
•H 'O CO C CO CO
3 Ol >J O S-i l-J
5 U CU 0)
Cfl 01 0) T3 TD
•H - r-4 0) 0) 0)
cn > w co fe cj fu

























A
i
1



























^^.
00
,
H 0) M C C S
4JC04JUWw'HCOC [a
u-ic-u-il-icoa.cfli-l ' Jfl
cao c/i coo. re c co4-> ^|
MCI3 M (-1 iHO iHCO '
T3«H W T3XI UCJ CJrH
CO u o
IW«H U-i M-li-l U-lC W-I-H
O-H O O3 O i-l O>
JsS S-S B^ =»= =S=

0
14.
a.

-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
  A)  OECIStON UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)Federal Activities HQ          MEDlAlnterdisp.

  EIS Review/New Source  EIS Preparation (H 215)     REG.    X   APPRO: A.  & C.
                                       To ensure that all Federal agencies
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES under Executive Order 11752, comply
 with Federal, State, interstate, & local substantive standards and limitations
 for prevention & control of environmental pollution. This can be accomplished
 through early identification of problems, assistance in obtaining funding,
 technical assistance, & enforcement actions, as necessary. Compliance with
 requirements under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act & NEPA to ensure that
 proposed actions of other Federal agencies do not adversely impact the quality
 of the environment. This can be accomplished through timely & thorough reviews,
 pre-draft & p're-final liaison, technical assistance, & referrals to CEQ. To
 ensure environmentally sound cost-effective decisions that are in compliance
 with objectives of NEPA in the new source discharge permits program. This
 can be accomplished through complete environmental reviews, timely preparation
 of either an EIS or negative declaration, evaluation of alternatives to proposed
                                  to prevent adverse environmental impacts.
   In Federal facilities compliance, primary emphasis was on ensuring
adherence to consent declarations and delayed compliance orders by noncomply-
ing Federal facilities.  Increased efforts were directed toward improving the
effectiveness and timeliness of water new source reviews and coordination with
the EIS review process.  The major emphasis was on EPA assistance to other
Federal agencies to integrate effective environmental planning with basic
programmatic decision-making processes on major energy, transportation, and
other development projects that might otherwise have caused severe pollution
or other environmental harm.  Revised EIS review guidelines on highway
projects have been drafted. A total of 15 draft and final EIS's on water new
source discharge permits should be completed. Technical guidelines on two
industries will be finalized and four will be drafted. Two areawide studies
will be completed on coal mining and energy related industries and two others
 D)  FY 79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION^11 be underway.
   In Federal facilities compliance, primary emphasis will continue to be on
negotiating delayed compliance orders with noncomplying Federal facilities and
ensuring adherence to the July 1979 statutory deadline.  Emphasis will be
focused on helping Federal agencies budget for pollution abatement
projects.  No significant change in the regional EIS review activity
from the current year is anticipated.  However, the budget reduction for
FT 1979 will result in a substantial reduction of headquarters input on
water quality impact reviews.  The major regional emphasis will be on
pre-draft impact statement liaison and pre-final impact statement consultation
Revised EIS review guidelines on highway projects will be finalized and
issued.   Work will begin on EIS review guidelines on nuclear power
plants,  airports, impoundments, and channelizations. Approximately 24 EIS's on
new source discharge permits are expected to be filed. Several additional Stat
will assume the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program, but
they are not expected to be States with any significant new source construction
activity. Technical guidelines on 14 industries will be finalized and three
others drafted.   Two areawide studies on coal mining and energy related
industries will be completed.

                                                                   JUk3
                                                                                >s
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  <>: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS

A,  DECISION)  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         RG       MEDJAj
HSIS  FED  ACTVTS/EIS REVIEW/NEW SRCE  PERMIT  EIS APPROIQA &  c

B.  RFSOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT FY 79  C.  £.   FY f*0  INCR    FY  80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT          66.0          65.o          50.0          50,0
 LEVEL              OPFT           2.0           1.0           1,0           1.0
01  OF  05             FTE                        67.9          58,9          58,9
    BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)     3,703.0      2,7o3.0      2,635,0      2,635,0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


     Federal Facilities Compliance -  Emphasis will be placed on identification of
     problems,  encouragement of funding  and  enforcement actions as necessary.
     Some technical assistance provided.  Minimal inspection activity and only on
     major Federal facilities.  Funding  this base level will place greater
     responsibilities on Federal facilities.  Compliance with applicable rules
     and regulations will primarily be voluntary for other than the limited
     major sources inspected.  Ability to assure adherence to compliance would
     drastically impact the implementation of E.G. 11752 and compliance with
     Section 313 of the Clean Water Act.  Control would be lost at the Federal
     level and  Federal facility compliance would be largely dependent upon
     whatever actions, if any, State  or  local agencies decided to implement.

     EIS 309 Review - Timely and thorough review of all EIS's will not be achieved
     Cursory pre-draft and pre-final  liaison performed with no post-EIS follow-up.
     None or very little technical assistance provided.  Only significant
     referrals.  EPA will marginally  carry out functions mandated under Section
     309 of the Clean Air Act and NEPA.  Not funding this level will preclude EPA
     from compliance with the legislative mandates.

     New Source EIS Preparation - EIS's  will be prepared on the most significant
     actions.   Low quality negative declarations with no mitigation activities.
     Medium quality environmental reviews will be performed.   Funding this level
     will result in some improvement  in  decisions from an environmental standpoint
     due to the nationally recognized and understood NEPA process being utilized.
     Not funding this level will result  in litigation because of non-compliance
     with legislative mandates, resulting in project delays.   There will be
     criticism  of the Agency by other Federal agencies and the public sector.
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

  R^  2: DECISION  UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 .  DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE         RG        MEUIM  I
H215  FEU  ACTVTS/EIS REVIEW/NEK SRCE  PERMIT EIS  APPRO:QA &  c
R.  RFSOtjRCF  SUMMARY
         POSITIONS   PFT
 LEVEL              OPFT
02  OF  05             FTE
    BUDGET  AUTH,  (000.03
FY  78  ACT  FY 79  C.  E.
      68.0          65.0
       2.0           1.0
                    67.9
  3,703.0      2,703.6
FY  60  INCR
        9.0
        1.0
        6.0
      ^65.6
FY  80  CU»
      59.0
       2.0
      60,9
  3, 100.6
     C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
        OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


     Federal  Facilities Compliance - Slight increase in technical assistance  on
     needs, plans and  specifications.  Additional  and more thorough inspections.
     Funding  this level will provide the minimum acceptable level of staffing to
     assure compliance by Federal facilities.   Not funding this level would result
     in  limited  ability to assure that Federal  facilities are complying with  the
     Clean Water Act and implementation of  E.O. 11752.

     ELS 309  Review - Number of timely reviews  will be increased.  Increased  pre-
     draft and pre-final liaison.  Post-EIS follow-up will be provided.  Funding
     this level  will provide the minimum acceptable level of staffing to assure
     that functions mandated under Section  309  of  the Clean Air Act and NEPA  are
     carried  out.  Not funding could result in  the Agency concurrently approving
     and disapproving a project due to lack of  liaison activities.

     New Source  EIS Preparation - Slight increase  in number of EIS's prepared.
     Minimum  pre-application meetings with  applicants.  Minimal field inspections
     by  EPA staff.  Funding would result in additional improvement in decision-
     making from an environmental standpoint.   Not funding would result in con-
     tinued litigation due to inadequate compliance with legislative mandates,
     continued inadequate reviews resulting in  poor environmental decisions,  and
     continued criticism of EPA by other Federal agencies and the public sector.
                                                                    JU'.S
   EPA Form 2410-1) (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
FORM  d; DECISION  U^IT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECISION  UNIT  TITLF  ANU CODF         RG
H2J5  FED  ACTVTS/EIS REVIEW/NEW  SRCE  PERMIT  £15 APPROjQA  & C

8.  RFSOUPCF.  SUMMARY       FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  E,  FY  eo  INCR    FY so  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT         68.0         65.0           7.0         66,0
 LEVEL              OPFT           2.0           1.0           1,0           3,0
03  OF  05             FTE                       67.9           5,«         70,3
    9MDGET  AUTH,  (000.0)     3,703.0      2/703.6                    3,100.6
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


     Federal  Facilities Compliance - Additional and more thorough  inspections.
     Enough pressure can be placed on Federal facilities to  affect compliance
     levels.   Funding this level will provide an acceptable  level  of  staffing to
     assure compliance by more Federal facilities.  Not funding this  level will
     result in less than full compliance with Section 313 of the Clean Water Act
     and less than  full implementation of  E. 0. 11752.

     EIS 309  Review - Timely and thorough  review of most EIS's will be achieved.
     Provide  technical assistance to other Federal agencies  as requested.
     Funding  this level will provide an acceptable level of  staffing  to  assure
     compliance with Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and NEPA.  Not  funding this
     level will mean that fewer EIS's submitted will be of acceptable quality
     resulting in more referrals to CEQ.

     New Source EIS Preparation - Improvement in quality of  negative  declarations
     and mitigation activities added.  Improvement in quality of environmental
     reviews. Minimal coordination of environmental and related laws with EIS/
     negative declaration analysis.  Funding would result in further  improvement
     in decision-making from an  environmental standpoint.   Not funding  would
     result in continued delays due to litigation for less than full  compliance
     with legislative mandates,  poor environmental decisions on some  actions, and
     continued criticism of EPA by other Federal agencies and the  public sector.
  EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------




















0
z
UJ
cs
<
>.
z cr
o «
••» s.
t- r
U 3
UJ tf>
O UJ
CC iJ
=
_ J C
•t CO
»- UJ
Z 0.
UJ
Z •«
O Z
CC 3
> Z
z c
U-' —
CO
CO — 1
UJ O
^ UJ O
« e a
*- \
CO — B.
c tr
uj r CL
N-t 3 o
Z u. —
3 UJ

^
few
r
c
kiW
CL
UJ
U
CO

z
U.'
z
V
X
UJ
UJ
cr
UJ
•V
CO
>
V-
LJ
CO «
z
00
«-» UJ
Ou.
UJ
cc in
v*
•- ru
CC X

a
cc
o-


CD
c*-^*
— CO
£
r
en
UJ
ruts
cc z
c- •»
— z
z
«
CL.


•••
cc
e*
«







UJ
„
e> »-
cc <
0 _J
— 3
X
•™j
U



UJ
o r
CO UJ
o- et
w* LJ
z
»•«



e» UJ
f*.
o- cc
— 0
3
U


_J
^ 3
e> *•*
x U
<






















o ru
in a
r*\ ru
•c a
ru ru
c ru
in a
KV ru
•e a
ru ru


o ru
• •
in a
KI ru
 ru
•c a
^ ^
ru ru





c ru cr ru o oe>
in * cc a o — co
m co a ru «r> tn
^ ru *t a
^ » * ^
ru — ~» ru




e rwcc ru e e o
^ -Jj> co a o — cc
m cc u ru tn in
« ru m a
« * » ^
ru — — ru




* ru a 1*1 o o e-
fo «• ru r*- ir» -• f-
o •*> a cc -D *
»- ru a a
^ » * «
M— •— ru



o o e co o o
»»< K> O •£> CD A!
o e> -• o u^
^ ffi rf\ a
^ ^ » »
« rv - «m





e
o
o ^>
K k. u. UJ
O < O tL. O U.
• uj cc o •** *^
U. X CC 3 O
o *- 3 r «• •-
3 O « «- «>
— -•re »
O »— CO C
^ Z X 3^ !•*
. > UJ ^^ UJ ^ ^~
UJ C9 *•* ^ «J ^^
> C ^" CO
UJ 3 3 C
_)tt C CL

o ru
o in
— cc
KI ru
« -c
o ru
o in
— CO
f< ru


* <
• •
o ru
o in
— cc
* «
KI ru


•c -c
• •
o ru
o in
— CO
* »
•*i ru





* ru a « o o v
o * a cu e> ru a
o cc —in tn •«
•« fi r*- co
* * ^ »
-»*>**•• ru




* o « a o e> o
in o tn cc o- — «
* o * ru
a — fi a







«T! v ru »- in •• t-
o -D a co •*> *
p^ ru a a
^ ^ * »
IV » — IV



c o oco o c
^v«n oo co ru
o e- — o o
^ f^ vt a
* * * ^
VI (V *• VI





o
o
o >-
CD »- U. UJ
o < o CL O u.
»uJ er e ^< wv
u. X ca 3 e
0 ^3 Z •» —

rv ^ I cc Z
0 t~ 03 C
•- z x >- •-
^J !&) ^M UJ ^ ^^
UJ C£ tv ^x ^ »•«
>• C. •— C/3
UJ 3 30
_rec c CL
•C •£>
c ru
e tn
— cc
Kt ru
•« *
o ru
o in
— CO
KI ru


* *
• •
o ru
e in
— CO
* ^
i** ru


•e -f>
• •
o ru
0 IT
— cr
* ^
vi ru





* ru a -fi o o KI
o -t> a ru « m o
o co — in -* r>
•M VI f^- CC
« » -» *
v> — •« tw




o o a
>- — m








o r« a v> o o o-

o « a cc « «
h- ru a a
^ ^ ^ »
ru — — • ru



o e oco e e
•vi vi o •« cc ru
o e- — o «
r*- w vi o
« ^ •* ^
vi rw ** vv





o
c *•
•» H- U.UJ
0 « OCL 0 u.
*uj cc e ^^
u. x en 3 c
o *- 3 r «» —
3 O ««-'•>
v>« z ee z
c *• co o
•- Z x >- *•
_J UJ •- LU « >-

> O »- CC
UJ 3 3D
_l tc O CL
CO
»•*
 I
O-
e
-------
         u
         z
         LU
         O
         <
         z
         g
         H
         o
         LU
         H
         o
         CC
         a.
         ^
         5 <
            to
            LU

            S

            Z
            CO
            O
            O
            u
            Z
            o
            co

            U
            LU

JLJf  -'-J    Q
J
            'CC

            O
            U.
e
1-1
i— 1
C.
•H
U
en
M
h-< ^
.. CL
< O
2*
LU Q.
s <





X

C LU
X CC


^v
m
CM
x
c
0
•H
•u
CO
CO
a
cu
u
a.
CO
w
4J
(J
eg
p t

cu
o
M
3
O
CO
3
01

^^
— 3
LU 01
O -H

d
a
Z CO
— 5
LU~--
j CO

H TJ
f£
2-H
D AJ
2 o

i-H
u 2
LU 0)
Q -a
0)

t-
Z
LU

W5
j
a.
O
O
0
LU
^
^
1

o
CO
o
>.
u.








_,
LU
^
UJ

LU

UJ
-1



LU
^
UJ
H
_ j
UJ
LU

1
UJ
>
UJ

I
1
UJ
>
UJ
a>
iv
S
u. a.
LU
00 rf
S**-

^ ^
^ 01
U. LU





UJ
CC
D

LU
5
^
=3
LU

Z
LU
1
X

MB
n^
l
o
o
o
^

CD


















£ £ tC S S ^ ;3 '£
rH


OOOr-»OONOm
^r r-« <}• in r-~ r—t -i
ti MC-^-H c c a.
•a ai o o o
i E . 1-1 en CD en

h J-IWCOOJJCJ03CU 0) O
Cu iJ U — ; U iJ ^J M -Hen
C T3--I 3= 3-ri « -CO JJJJ
i^ Q ^3 O ^ Q PS QI j^-, c^ «£J
jj ucntncucni-io) cu LJB
•H -dcoe a. cuvj M coj-i
3 CUUOr-l r-IO-D. C- -HQJ
3 a co x: « o Q,
en cu en ^ -u u£ en en encn cu
co > w ed "8 S -O-H co-d co-d o
M CUMCO) CU3WBMBCU)-l
(jj i-* f""] iH f&i CU t-4 W i-i &3 M ^3
u_i cj c cu ai -H o . J
u cn-ucoi-iCpO'Ua.i-io.-uen |
cSOCOcOO.i-)i-!-^lWcBCUCCU'*3 1
ijenMw sfli— icflcos-iai-iocuD
•OiH Cd 73^: Eo. s^H -dl-i u-i!- CB
CO j-i C O 3 3

Ot-t o o3 oo o> ocn ow oo
MM»4«%«.%«i
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A ) DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
Consolidated Grants (H220)
HQ
REG. x
MEDIA: Interdisp
APPRO: A&c
  B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
       This  decision unit is  related to  a major new Administration legislative
  initiative to  be  forwarded  to Congress in FY 1979,  Consolidated Environmental
  Assistance.  The  proposal will impact  the entire range of EPA State and
  local assistance  grant  programs.   Indeed, OMB has indicated that all budget
  requests concerning EPA grant programs will be submitted to Congress in the
  context  of the Consolidated  Grant  effort.

       The Consolidated Grant  proposal is a legislative proposal developed by
  EPA  and  supported by the Administration.   It establishes an alternative way
  for  State  and  local governments to obtain EPA grant assistance.   It is  a
  voluntary  option  for State and local governments.   THe proposal deals with
  environmental  program planning, management,  and  operation,  as well  as
  federal aid  reform.   It is designed as a  way to  support integration of  the
  various elements  of a "total" environmental  program.

       EPA developed  the  Consolidated Grant proposal  at President  Carter's
  direction.   The agency  was created to  integrate  environmental programs  and
  concerns,  and  had experimented with consolidating grant programs administra-
  tively.  Legislative constraints limited  the potential of this administrative
  effort, further emphasizing  the need for  a legislative approach.

       The proposed program is  designed  to  support:

       o  Comprehensive and integrated environmental  planning,  program
         implementation  and management.

       o  Increased flexibility  for  State and  local Government  to  determine
         environmental protection priorities  and  allocate  resources.

       o  Simpler and  more efficient  program administration.

       This specific decision unit relates  to  the very  significant  supplementary
 assistance provisions in the legislative  proposal.  The Agency would use the
 funds requested under this decision unit  to  implement  the supplementary
 assistance aspect of  the Consolidated  Grants program.  The proposal would
 authorize the Agency to award  supplementary  assistance funds  to  accomplish
 the following objectives:

      o  To  provide an incentive to States  to consolidate their environmental
         efforts.

      o  To  provide the Agency with leverage  to reward good performance.

      o  To  provide necessary support for developing State and local capacity
         to  integrate the management of  their environmental programs.

      o  To  provide the Agency with the  ability to support and encourage
         special projects (eg. the Connecticut civil penalties program).  ..,
EPA Form 2410-10 (8-78)
-------
,.,,,{
uui.
    C)  FY 78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

         During FY'78, the Agency developed a draft legislative proposal
    authorizing award of Consolidated Grants to State and local
    environmental agencies, and submitted the proposal to OMB.  EPA provided
    the draft to OMB following an extensive development phase which involved
    meeting in three regions with State and local representatives, and active
    participation by public interest groups.

         The major features of the product that resulted from these efforts
    addressed issues of voluntary participation, program authority and
    coverage, grant recipients, integrated program plans, plan approval,
    funding flexibility, accountability, fund allotments and limitations, and
    supplementary assistance.

         Participation in the Consolidated Grants program is voluntary:

         o  A State or local Government may choose to seek a
            Consolidated Grant or continue to seek categorical grant
            support .

         o  A locality may still have this option after its State has made
            a decision one way or the other.

         The basic elements of program authority and coverage are that:

         o  The EPA Administrator may award a Consolidated Grant based
            on an approved integrated program plan.

         o  The Administrator may award a Consolidated Grant to the
            same recipient in subsequent years, but the proposal does
            not obligate him to do so.

         o  A Consolidated Grant may include any environmental program
            other than construction and the Section 205 G program of  State
            Management Assistance for Construction Grants, for which  the
            Administrator has responsibility if it permits or requires  State
            or local activities.
         The proposal indicates that States are to be the principal
    Consolidated Grant recipients, but that local or interstate agencies
    may also apply.  Eligibility for a Consolidated Grant would be dependent
    on eligibility for at least two EPA categorical grants.

         The integrated program plan is the annual plan upon which grant
    approval rests:

         o  It represents the applicant's integrated approach to its
            environmental programs.

         o  It covers program planning, development, implementation,
            and imp r o vemen t .

         o  It provides for coordination of administration of the
            grant by a designated agency.
-------
     o  It must reflect both public participation and State/Local
        consultation in its development.

     EPA regulations would promote grantee discretion in developing a
plan to meet the grantee's particular environmental needs.

     The Administrator of EPA would be authorized to approve a plan in
whole or in part, providing his specific reasons for any disapproval.
An approvable plan must:

     o  Adequately address the objectives of all covered programs
        in light of the applicant's environmental needs.

     o  Provide for sound and efficient administration of its elements.

     o  Provide adequately for the environmental needs of local
        Governments.

     Grantee funding flexibility is an important element in Consolidated
Grants.  Based on an approved integrated program plan a grantee may
transfer funds among the covered programs in its plan.  A grantee may
transfer from any covered program (eg. air, water, solid waste, etc.)
up to 20% of the funds allocated to that program.

     Grantee accountability for expenditures will be related to the
approved integrated program plan.  EPA auditors will track to the plan
as opposed to the statutes authorizing each particular covered program.

     Funds for Consolidated Grants would be allotted as follows:

     o  Each applicant's Consolidated Grant funds will be at least
        the sum of the allotments which would have been available
        under the covered categorical programs included in the
        applicant's plan.

     o  The Administrator may use unobligated or deobligated funds
        at his discretion to accomplish the ends for which the funds
        were allotted.

     o  Approved Consolidated Grants will have priority for reallotted
        funds.

     o  No grantee may receive Federal funds in any year when Non-
        Federal funds to be spent are less than the amount spent
        the previous year - - State-wide reductions are an exception.

     Supplementary assistance is the feature to which the funds requested
in this Decision Unit are related.  The proposal authorizes the
Administrator to award up to 202 additional funds, beyond those allotted
for covered programs, to Consolidated Grant recipients.  As specified
earlier these funds are basically incentives or inducements to participate
in the program and resources to support program integration and related
projects.
                                                                            i «•' r •
-------
D)  FY'79 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

     In FY 1979, the Administration will submit the Consolidated Grant
legislative proposal to Congress.  The proposal is likely to get
multiple referrals in Congress because of the array of committees
concerned with EPA programs.  Following hearings on the proposal,
Congress will act on the legislation.  If it is passed, the Administrator
will publish regulations within 180 days of passage.  Simultaneously, Agency
regional office staff will work closely with State and local officials
to prepare to implement the program in FY 1980.
 Jul  :
-------
                   ENVIRON/MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM  Z: DECISION UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
A,  DECT SI UN UNIT  TITLE AMD  CODE          RG
H2PO  CONSOLIDATED GRANTS                            APPRO:  ARC

R,  RFSOURCF SUMMARY        FY 78  ACT FY  79 C.  F.   FY 60  INCR    FY  80 CU*
         POSITIONS  PFT
 LEVF.L       '       OP^T
01  OP 02             FTE
            AUTH,  (000,0)                                15,000.0     15,000,0
     C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.
         Activities - The proposed legislation authorizes  the Agency to provide
     incentive  funds to those states electing to participate  in  the Consolidated
     Grant Program.  The incentive funds could be up  to 20% of the total amount
     of grant funds provided by EPA to the State.  Assuming this  20% incentive
     funding level in each state, EPA could provide incentive funds to
     approximately 30% of the States.

         Benefits of Funding - Most states expressing  interest  in consolidating
     their environmental programs can be encouraged to  do so.  This will result
     in approximately 30% of the states being able to develop and administer
     comprehensive programs for the protection of the environment, tailored to
     their particular environmental problems  and  reflecting appropriate attention
     given to the interrelated nature of environmental  problems.  It will
     improve the effectiveness and efficiency of  those  States' environmental
     programs by providing them with increased flexibility in determining their
     own environmental priorities and in allocating resources accordingly.  It
     will also reduce paperwork and other administrative burdens associated
     with categorical federal program assistance.

         Consequences of Not Funding - No funds  would  be available to encourage
     participation in the Consolidated Grant  Program.   Some states that desire
     to integrate their environmental program would not be able to so because
     front end funds used for start-up costs  would not  be available.  For
     example, common administrative services  eliminating duplication would not
     be available.  Incentive funds may be critical to  establish an infrastructure
     for an environmental enforcement or monitoring program.  A single
     environmental inspection program is often critical to integrated programs.
     Without incentive funds, many such programs  could  not be instituted.  EPA
     would have no leverage for rewarding and  encouraging good performance.
   EPA Form 2410-11 (8-78)
-------
                   ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2: DECISION  UMT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A, DECISION  UNIT  TITLE  AND CODE          RG       MEDIA;  INTRDPL
H220  CONSOLIDATED  GRANTS                           APPRO|  A  & C

R. RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 76  ACT  FY  79  C.  E.   FY  tQ  1NCR    FY 8Q  CUM
         POSITIONS   PFT
 LEVEL               OPFT
02 OF  02             FTE
   BUDGET  AUTH.  (000.0)                                10,000.0     25,000.0
    C.  DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
       OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


        Activities - Funding  at Level 2 will provide  support for another
    20% of states not covered  by Level 1.

        Benefits of Funding - Approximately 50% of the states could be
    encouraged to participate  in the Consolidated Grant Program, expanding
    the benefits described  under Level 1.

        Consequences of Not Funding - No funds will be available to encourage
    approximately 70% of the states to participate in  the  Program, limiting the
    potential effectiveness of the Consolidated Grant  program, and, therefore,
    not addressing the problems outlined under Level 1 Consequences of Not
    Funding for almost half the States.
         uor
-------

«
tc
tr
""

f^
CD
CT ^N
»*«
bJ
^>
««
Z
»•«
H-
05
U

(W C?
ec z
o- <->
— z
z
«
_J
o.
>-
0
z
UJ ^"
t- ft
« c-
X *••
z a
0 «t

to- Z
o o
UJ a;
^
O UJ
C U UJ
0. 3. >
. 2 *••«
.J C 0 •-
« 03 CC «
>- JJ O — J
Z St. — =>
uj z

Z *"« ftj
o z
E 3
> Z »-
z c z
UJ — UJ
» o z
CO t-» CO UJ
u o o a
•• UJ — « U
« C Z
CO •»
^1
f^.
UJ C
>- a t-
•< O CO
Z u, P- UJ
^ ^
o- a
"" £
u
_>
cc «
r» 3
e> ^»
•• u
«K
ce
z
<
tr
(£

C
UJ
ft*
«
O

_j
CO O
Z CO
O T
•- o
o u
U.'
C 0
ru
»- rg
a x
0 0
0 O
0 C
o o
in »i

0 0
• •
o o
c c
O 0
t» fc
ID f*\
~*

O O
• *
0 0
0 O
O 0

in m


0 0
0 0
e o
c e
ft. ft
in •*>




e o e
• • •
e o o
o o o
c o c

in ir>m




o o o
• • •
C 00
o o o
o e o

in ITIK>














^•»
o
c
o t-
if. t~ U. UJ
*VJ ft^ «J ^^ Lw CL ^*
c « o a. o u.
• UJ ff O ft^ ft^
k. T CO S 0
D •- 3 X •» «
3 O « ft* CC
— « Z or z
o *- co o
•- z x >- ••
-J UJ •" UJ < »-
UJ m s_ ft, _J _>
> o >- tn
uj r z> o
-J(T O tV
0 0
o o
o o
o o
in in
CM
0 C
o o
0 0
0 0
ft ft
in in
CM

O O
0 C
o c
0 0
ft ft
m m
(V

o e
0 0
0 0
o o
ft ft
in in
ru



o o o
• • ft
o o o
0 00
0 00
ft ft ft
m m in
«v rv



o o o
« • •
e o e
o o o
e o o
ft ft ft
C OK
— •••













•^
O
o
0 *-
«t •• U. UJ
fu ft- j »s u, a. *-
C « OO. O U.
• UJ C O ft^ ft^
U. Z CO S 0
O »- 3 I «•> ••»
S O « •» CB
fu « i c z
0 t- CO O
^- Z X >• k^
_1 UJ •- UJ < •-
UJ t» ••> «^ _( ••
> e •- en
UJ => S C
_JCC Ob.
              I
              tr
              c
0055
-------
JU!

















u
z
UJ
a
z
g
o
UJ
^w
0
QT
a.
_i
<
H
2 >
LU ££
0 1
sl

2 H
^ Z
UJ
X
C/3
I]
a.
^g
O
CJ
o
h-

z
z
g
C/5
O
UJ
Q

. .
3 *
2
•Q:
O
U_

a.
0]
•H
•O
01 U
C <
M
.. a.
< 0
§1





X
O LU
x cc


























So
°E
§7
2- 4J
LU
H
^^ ^J
o3

CD
0 C
LU O
00

<




CO
f™
Z
LU
2
X
to
a.
O
o
0
LU
H
_l
S
^*
QJ
o
00
a>
^
>
u.





_J
LU
UJ
-1

_
LU
^
LU
_J


LU
^
LU
LU
LU

1

1
^ J
LU
LU
_J
^
LU
Ul
_J


C5
C) •
" 0
> tt
u- a.
LU
t-
ai S
> lo
LL LU


LU
tr
D
CO
<
UJ
1
LU
_
P
HMENT
CO
Ij
a.

O
a
o
^

CD


















5^0
O
u-i


b
m






I



I



 -rt
*H rH
QUO
w e co
01 C
01 o o
at c u
cfl C •
U 0) -H E
W T3 50
•H 0) U
U-i > JJ 60
o o to o
M a. u
•u BU 1-1 a.
e o I
1





















A
•
^





















00
t
CO
CM
1
01 T3 -H u H
cj 1-1 u a [^
l-i 3 l-i CO
0) O to Lj
ix o a. 60


E
o
U.

a.

-------
                 ENERGY  MEDIA



                    CONTENTS


                                         PAGE

A.   MEDIA RESOURCE  SUMMARY	      57

B.   MEDIA OVERVIEW	      58

C.   MEDIA RANKING	      66

D.   BUDGET REQUEST  BY DECISION UNIT.      68

E.   DECISION UNIT  DESCRIPTIONS AND
     LEVELS

          RESEARCH  AND DEVELOPMENT...      72
-------
-------
                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                       FY 1980 OMB REQUEST

                             Energy
                     Media Resource Summary
                             FY 1979           FY 1980           Change
                                       (dollars in thousands)
Research & Development
Permanent Positions	    148              150               +2
Budget Authority	112,520.0        111,996.0           -524.0
                                                                       'UM
                                                                       JvJ v
-------
                       ENERGY MEDIA OVERVIEW


 I'    OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY

     Environmental quality is influenced both by the structure of the
 Nation's economic activities  for resource extraction and manufacture
 and by the technological capabilities of available pollution controls.
 The Nation is now striving to reduce its dependence upon scarce  clean
 fuels, particularly foreign petroleum.  The development of domestic energy
 resources to power the Nation's industry may pose a variety of threats
 to environmental quality.  One of the Agency's major objectives  is to
 protect the public health and welfare from adverse environmental effects
 associated with the shift from petroleum and natural gas to coal.
 Research and development toward this end is mandated by the Clean Air
 Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.  To be effective, such
 protection must be accomplished through an integrated approach so that
 the control of one form of pollution does not result in other unacceptable
 impacts.  Effective control of the environmental impact of changes in the
 Nation's energy systems must be based on a sound understanding of the
 likely course of energy development  and must be accomplished in a
 reasonable manner at an acceptable cost.

     The Nation's attempts to meet its serious energy needs will be
 determined by the policies adopted by the Department of Energy.  The
 major provisions include:

     •   .Increased use of coal through conventional combustion;

     •    More efficient energy extraction and utilization processes; and

     •    The replacement of dwindling oil and gas supplies with
          synthetic gas and liquid fuels derived from coal.

     The President addressed the environmental issues inherent in the
 changeover of the energy systems in his environmental message:   "In
 the near term the switch to coal must be accomplished with currently
 available technology.  I recognize that pollution control technology
 for direct combustion of coal is not fully adequate and directed that
 Federal research be increased in certain key areas.   For the longer term,
 I am directing the Administrator of EPA  the Secretary of  DOE and the
Secretary of HEW to identify the health and environmental effects of each
advanced technology  and  to develop procedures for establishing standards
for all new energy technologies."
 "> I
-------
     Because of the potentially acute health and ecological effects
associated with energy initiatives and with both existing and new
technologies for fuel processing, conversion, and utilization, the
Environmental Protection Agency has made a major commitment to ensuring
that the environment and human health are protected.  Further, since
many of the problems are long term (e.g., many technologies will not be
available or in commercial use before 1985), EPA must have programs under
way to develop the health and technical data necessary to support
energy-related environmental quality standards and source discharge or
emission regulations.  The lead times for health assessment and control
technology development are such that research programs must be implemented
now if energy development is to be compatible with environmental protection.

     Several problem areas requiring long-term research may result in
Agency regulatory and enforcement activity.  Increased reliance on
substitute fuels from coal and oil shale may generate new pollutants
whose effects are not yet known and must be defined.  For example, coal
gasification processes may emit unacceptable quantities of carcinogenic
materials.  New and emerging energy sources (e.g., advanced combustion
systems and geothermal facilities) may produce cumulative chronic health
and ecological effects.  We must have research in these areas now if we
are to ensure the compatibility of energy system development and
public health and welfare.

     The Agency must also address many energy-related environmental problems
in the near term.  The Nation will substantially accelerate coal use.
Industrial coal consumption, in particular, is projected to increase.
Electric utility consumption will also grow as new coal-fired capacity is
constructed.  This conversion from oil to coal will result in additional
emissions of particulates, nitrogen oxides, sulfur compounds, and other
combustion pollutants.  The increased use of coal and oil shale will
accelerate mining in semi-arid western areas, raising serious questions
about restoration of mined lands and degradation of the quality of
available ground and surface water resources.  The expanded interest
in offshore oil may lead to increased environmental problems associated
with petroleum extraction, transportation, and coastal refining.

     The primary goals of the energy research and development program
are (1) to provide a sound data base necessary for the Agency to
establish regulations and incentives to encourage the use of environ-
mentally acceptable practices in extraction, processing, and utilization
of energy resources and (2) to provide, where necessary, environmental
control options for those extraction, processing, and utilization
practices which cause significant health and ecological damage.
                                                                      Ou .  d
-------
     Assessment will determine the potential environmental problems
associated with currently unregulated coal combustion pollutants
(e.g., trace elements, organics, sulfates).   In addition, informa-
tion on the health and ecological effects of coal and oil shale extraction
and on environmentally protective mining and reclamation techniques will
be developed.  The program has developed and will demonstrate the operation
of staged combustion, low NOx burners for pulverized coal.  The program in
flue gas desulfurization will assess operating systems and evaluate sludge
handling procedures.  Control of particulates will focus on evaluating
the effectiveness of alternative technologies for limiting fine particle
emissions.

     The definition of the environmental problems and requirements for
control of the longer term energy supply systems is of particular
importance.  EPA is not responsible for energy technology development
per se, but must work in concert with the Department of Energy and other
agencies.  The approach used is to:  (1) conduct environmental assessments
to identify new pollutants and determine their potential health and
ecological effects; (2) develop an adequate scientific basis for new
environmental regulations; (3) provide guidance on control technology
requirements to Federal and industry groups developing new technologies;
(4) assist in the development of control technologies especially where
the Office of Research and Development has special expertise; and
(5) assess the adequacy of existing control technologies.

     The implementation is fundamentally extramural, with EPA relying
heavily on expertise available within both the Federal and industrial
sectors.  EPA will continue to manage,  coordinate, and integrate the
efforts of 17 Federal agencies under the auspices of the Interagency
Energy/Environment program.   ln addition to the major interagency
components of the program, much of the research and development program
is performed by industrial organizations and universities via contracts
and grants.


     Each of the participating Federal agencies or departments has its
own charge (e.g., management of Federally owned energy resources,
management of Federal lands,development of new fuel sources or cycles).
In pursuing its own programs and responsibilities, each Agency must have
access to the available information on the environmental effects of energy
development and must also perform the research necessary to provide needed
additional data.  EPA's management of the interagency program attempts to
minimize the overlap of the separate research programs and to assure a
reasonably comprehensive -coverage pf all energy/environment questions.  In
addition, the results of the interagency research program are disseminated
and reviewed through a system of publications, joint conferences, and
symposia supported by the Office of Energy,  Minerals, and Industry.
 GC  3
-------
 II.   RANKING CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES

      The resources  of the energy R&D program are to be used to improve
 decision making as  new energy facilities are constructed.   The
 important criteria  are as follows:

      •   The immediacy of the problem and the anticipated  environmental
          benefit of developing the  required  knowledge;

      c   The importance of research on the human health impacts of
          energy pollutants rather than on ecological effects;

      •   The relevance of the R&D program to the known schedule of
          Federal regulatory actions and the  ability of the program to
          generate an information base to improve the regulatory process ",

      9   The degree of generality of the environmental problem and the
          Nation wide importance  of  the risk; and

      o   The probable schedule for  the commercial use of present
          and new energy technologies and systems.

 III.  1980 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS


     The  energy  program will  decrease  in funding  by  about  $500,000 and
 increase  by  two  positions  over  FY  1979  levels.   Major  resource  losses
 will occur  in  the  environmental  assessment  of conventional  and  advanced
 energy systems  and  the nitrogen  oxide  control programs, whereas the
 ecological  effects  and the fuel  processing, preparation,  and  advanced
 combustion programs  show  significant  increases over FY  1979 levels.
IV. REQUEST SUMMARY
                                 FY 1980 Total      Change from FY  1979
                                 PFT  BA$(000)      PFT      BA$(000)

Research and Development	 150   111,996       +2         -524

     Health Effects of Energy
       Related Pollutants	 (  3) (20,430)    (0)      (      0)

     The goal of this interagency program is to provide data to reduce
the uncertainties in estimates of risk to human health associated with
non-nuclear energy technologies,  emphasizing fossil fuels.  The program
consists of efforts to develop the tools and data base (beyond that
available from the participating agencies'  base programs) required to
-------
 obtain reliable dose-response relationships for inhalation,  ingestion,
 and skin  exposures from a variety of  energy related agents.  Research
 is undertaken at various levels of  tissue organization and  includes
 human health  (epidemiological and clinical) and animal toxicological
 studies.   Supporting  studies are necessary  to  develop valid bioassy tests
 and to model risk to  humans on the  mechanisms  of metabolism and  fate
 in biological systems and on the damage  and repair processes.  Also in-
 cluded is the use of  bioassay systems to detect the presence of  biologically
 active materials in residues from energy production and  use.
       The  major  difference  in  the  1980 program as compared to 1979 is
  that  there  is an  increase  in  emphasis  on  the  supporting  studies  to
  improve the quantitative nature of  the bioassay  systems  and  the  capabi-
  lity  to extrapolate  from animal data.   This increase  in  effort will
  be  accompanied  by a  similar decrease  in emphasis  on the  use  of qualita-
  tive, non-validated bioassay test  systems.

       Flue Gas Particulate
        Control	    15      8,900        0               0

       Planned activities in this program will  continue assessing  conven-
  tional technology developments to support  Stationary  Source  Standards
  revisions;  developing  technology to encourage expanded coal  usage with
  emphasis  on low sulfur coals;  assessing and developing technology for
  the setting of  Diesel  Emission Standards  and  justification for the
  control of  fugitive  emissions; and  fundamental research  to support all
  program activities.  The program will  expand  the  activities  to obtain
  information on  the fine particulate emissions and the capabilities of
  control technologies to remove fine particulate materials.

       Measurements &  Instru-
        mentation	   1.0     8,537        0               0

       The  measurements  and  instrumentation program is  directed toward
  identifying and quantifying pollutants related to energy production  or
  use and to  the  improvement of pollutant measurement capabilities.  The
  two main  objectives  in this area are  to accelerate development of new
  and improved sampling  and  analysis methods for energy related pollutants,
  and to identify,  measure,  and monitor  pollutants  associated  with rapid
  implementation  of emerging energy technologies.

       Highlights of FY  8C include the  assessment  of expanded  regional
  baseline  data on  air and water pollutants resulting from energy  development
  in  the West* application of advanced  synoptic monitoring techniques  to
  regional  air pollution episodes . and  increased  emphasis  on measurement
  methods and calibration techniques  for energy related organics.
JIU '.'
-------
     Transport & Fate
        (Energy)	    3      8,460       0               0

     The transport processes program investigates the  transmission  by  air,
water,  and soil of pollutants emitted from energy operations  from their
sources to their destination in man and  the environment.  Additionally,
it covers the physical and chemical changes that the pollutants  undergo
during  their transport.  Emphasis in air transport research is on
conversion of sulfur and nitrogen oxides, chiefly from coal burning
power plants, to sulfates and nitrates.

     Highlights of the FY 1980 program include the continuation  of  the
multi-state power plant pollution study  of sulfates in the Eastern  U.S.;
nitric  acid aerosol transformation and transport studies, chiefly in
the Ohio Valley; characterization of hazardous ambient organics
from power plants; and studies of the transformation and  fate
of petroleum hydrocarbons in marine and  fresh water environments.

     Flue Gas Sulfur Oxide
        Control	    5      1,889       0               0

     Planned research in this area will  continue the existing flue  gas
cesulfurization (FGD) technology development program and will initiate
bench scale evaluation of the MgOx FGD process.  The MgOx process offers
the potential for highly reliable FGD operations, 90+  percent sulfur
dioxide removals, and minimal FGD sludge  disposal problems.  Activities
planned for FT 1980 are designed to provide timely input  to the  revision
cf the  New Source Performance Standard for electric utility boilers to
be initiated as early as ,1982.  The expertise developed in this  program
will  provide  guidance  to  the DOE  flue gas  desulfurization program to  be
 initiated  with FY  1980 funds.
     Fuel Processing, Prep-
       aration and Advanced
       Combustion	   47    13,144      +4           1,195

     Plans for FY 1980 include a comprehensive environmental assessment
program to provide data and recommendations on emissions, effluents'*
.control technology to the  air,  water and solid wastes standard setting in
 the area  of  coal cleaning,  synthetic fuels from coal, and fluidized bed
 combustion  (FBC).  An  accelerated  effort will be conducted  to  provide
 early  input  in  the area  of  near  term technologies,  such as  atmospheric
 FBC, physical coal cleaning,  and low-BTU coal gasification.
                                                                    I'' f  '
                                                                   Jul -
-------
A special effort will be conducted to develop methods for sampling and
analysis and continuous monitoring of emissions.  These methods will
quantify total organic and inorganic compound emissions  and characterize
their toxicity.

     Energy Extraction	   24     3,707       0!           +337

     The industrial energy extraction program for 1980  will continue to
focus on environmental quality problems associated with the technologies
and processes for obtaining fuels: oil or natural gas extraction, oil
shale development, and coal mining.  The major objective of the research
program will include:  1) assessments of existing and potential adverse
impacts from active and planned fuel extraction processes; 2) development
of control technologies to abate pollution from coal mining operations in
support of our enforcement activities; 3) development of techniques for
mitigation from oil spills; and 4) technology development for control of
pollutants from emerging extraction technologies (oil shale, tar sand, etc).

     Supplemental funding of  $337,000 will be utilized in the assessment
of newly emerging waste  reduction  and control technologies  for  use
in secondary and tertiary municipal waste treatment facilities and in
offshore/onshore oil and gas producing facilities.   Dischage and emission
control technologies applicable to the transportation and storage of
petroleum products will also be investigated.

     Environmental Assessment
       of Conventional and
       Advanced Energy
       Systems	   24    15,210     .-4.         -2,649

     The conventional and advanced energy systems program provides
environmental assessments and contributes to the development of environ-
mentally compatible advanced technologies.  Specific elements of the
program include control technologies for waste recovery, analysis of the
air quality implications of energy conservation, and environmental
assessments of geothermal, solar, biomass,and wastes as fuel energy sources,
The integrated technology assessments provide summary analyses of the
environmental, economic, and social consequences of current and future
energy supply and use alternatives.  These studies use the results of
the other portions of the energy/environmental research program in
evaluating the cost/risk/benefit trade-offs of energy production and
pollution control alternatives.

     As a result of reduced funding in this area, characterization of
residuals from conventional combustion processes will be very limited.
Environmental assessments of advanced energy technologies and energy
conservation methods will be reduced.  In addition, cooling system
ecological impact studies will be impeded and gaps in emissions data
bases will continue to exist, limiting decision making on unregulated
pollutants and on revision of standards for regulated pollutants.
  ulil
-------
     Nitrogen Oxide Control...   23    13,815      ' 0.         -1,035.'

     Activities planned for FY 80 are designed to impact  the  Clean Air Act
mandated review of the Utility Boiler Standard of Performance in 1982.
The low NOx coal burner program will continue the developmental efforts
on single burners and multiple burner arrays and will initiate efforts
to demonstrate the burner on two 100-300 MWe utility  boilers.  Efforts
will continue to advance the NOx control "State of the Art" for
industrial boilers, stationary internal combustion engines, stationary
gas turbines, and advanced energy systems.

     The reduced level of funding will  affect the number  of coal types
evaluated in the low NOx coal burner development program  and  reduce  the
field applications testing efforts of combustion modification technology.

     Ecological Effects	    5    17,904      +2       ,+1,628

     Activities planned for FY 1980  will  continue  the work on
determining the acute and chronic toxicological effects on freshwater,
marine/estuarine, and terrestrial  organisms and  resultant ecosystem
impacts from single pollutants and combination of pollutants  released
from energy extraction, processing, conversion, and/or transmission
systems.  Efforts will also be directed toward expanding  the  USDA acid rain
network and continuing the acquisition of reclamation/revegetation data/
information in support of the mandates of PL 95-87.   Plans include
initiating a major ecosystem impact study utilizing an active drilling rig
in the Gulf of Mexico to determine ecological effects of  offshore oil and
gas drilling adjacent to the Texas Flower Gardens, and interagency (EPA,
DOE, and HEW) workshops to identify potential health  and  environmental
issues and problems associated with advanced energy technologies.

     The position and funds increase will be utilized to  initiate a
research program designed to improve our capability to perform ecological
damage assessments of oil spills of both short-term (acute) and long-term
(chronic )  damage.  The damage assessment capability is essential if  an
orderly process is to be developed for establishing liability under  the
provisions of present or proposed oil spill control legislation.
-------










-
— CO
U -' ' UJ
•- "» =G
}TATt3 tNVlHUNMENt AL PHI)
FY 1980 OMH IIUOGfcl Ht
MlOIA HANKING |A


^





V
-J
-J
ooes5
- z
->
o

UJ
>>
< a.
.j
3
£
O Q.
«%
O
J <-
UJ
a.
uj 3
a:
2
s.





_.
UJ
X Z
•3
z
z
o
f-
—

9
»
o
^ ,
o
r
0
a
c



>E CONIHUL
X
z
2


O

"Z
••
o
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooo
0^r-»^-*^0»AJmr\i*0*»C-*it>^™--^^»^fV<>* tfMno**l*»0>


_._ 	 -»---.- -------^
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.OO COOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooo

OOOOOO9OOOOOOOOO9OOOOOOO9OOOOOO C O O O O

9O9C9999OO OO C
o==ooooeo =000000 coos 9 = 99 999 9=
; 4
u a. u a a. u o uj a. a. •
k-U MJ UJ UJ 3 ^
o a o 3 3 s
0? «J •— •« B3 >- »- aiCOri UJ H- CO ~- tn
Z CO UJ CO CO Z UJ UJ CO CO Z CO UjZuJZ
•• z x >• x^ xcr z >• •- I •- z«-z«-
_i co co en _) co co _J co uj _i j
— a z cs >• f-za. -J a z»->-xz s — -sa-jat
z «zta z« zz < z j < 3 z zz
•— -scszz — cao zz o— zQca a — ~z 3 z s
^ujZZuJuJ «J ZWZ22UJUJ Z*JuJuJZ «JZ uJuJUJu^
3.- — 3Z 33^^. — .- 3 3 Z — O 9 O— •- —
...^coz)... Q. - Z3OC _j _i a: z — o a: z*-3z z a.
UJ>- — J Z ZuJ H-v JJ ZZZZ •— UJ >••— U. ZuJ ZJ^J'*-
zc»»z»«.»— oz zu»»>-»* — — oo zz.«c3z ocr>3-».s»a
z c — o z u vzaoaoQ z z (_>o — z— u auszaz
CfZ CZZU UJ U _1 3 Z ZZ UUuJuJ_3UZZ3 kUU U.ZZZZ
xuj-uia. — — OXOQ.UJ***"*'— •- oo3a_z—uja. az-«a«-uj — uj
Z 2 > UJ — Z Z 22uJuJ — — ZZ> — 2 — Z Z
UJU.ZOZZ— XuJ— D u. Z -t Z I t — — XX — OuJZu,a x>jJZXZu.£u.
3 — >-Z3« 3 Z«-3—»-»-za: ««3SZ— 33(- 3 — 3 Z 3 Z 3
u. a. _j •— u _i u. 3 _i 0.0.0. — — —J _i 3 —ju. u _j u- a — —
— ZZZU.UZ3 X— ZZXZZZUU33 Z U. — Z Z Z 3~*Z3Z—Z —
L> »^«-flcoa.:^-ju— «tr •»**>«£*t»-*2.;3:.a_j»iC9u<.o ^ »- ^- -J u » _j ^ ^
i.t.»»-.jy.i^6o a u. aj^ooo^^a.. yjy.t.oi»jjQ:3: u. o ^ ^ ^ ^
•AJ cr C wtfjco^-wtkiz aocccowi— (75eocr3«2 .jj en a: »-^ C5yjco5ff:.2:.?;a
^oo .rz «-O«n 2 z 2""^zo5 ^"'.zcozeo
«
CCCCCCOCGCOCOCCCCtDDOCCDOCOCO — CC COOOOCCC
oooc^ooooooooooooooooooooooooooe ooooooo^
rTTTTTTrrTTTTTTTT^TTTTrT'TTTTTTr TTTTrT ^H
^^^oo "(jCo^^oo^ iA ^ .^ o ^ s* yi ^ .A i^ 5 -^.HOup so i? ^ ^ j^ \fi s* ^i s ^
•v..-^ a.n*-S9-o-M-^ay>^f^it>9-(x->a.r-o^»09-,-u •oa-^-o-.oa-o
O99999O999OO9O99OO90O9999099OO9 9O9O99O9
-------
z    x> z
uJ    C <
r       a.
z    ec
o    s «
>
z
u.    C-
         O
      c u.
                           o
                           o
                           c
                        _) «-•
                           c.
                        UJ O
                        — B
                        X X
                                    cooooooooooooo
                                                  >rurvf\i*vifv?u!M^'^
                                    oooocooooooeoo
                                    •^1 •^•»t*J1**l«*-(»*lVll*).*|«*>f*t^ «*|
                                    cooooooooooooo


                                    «c .C^»H»»».r^^fc*«fcp».®tf)^tt CO
                                    o o    oooooeoooeo
                                                                           o

                                                                           IV
                                                            o c       o
                                                             •  •        •
                                                            •^ ru       —
cr>
x
05
U          U
uJ          uj

•e          ri «

03    03    03 Z
I    >•    I "
03    n    03 _j
-0!       - O
z i- x    z a.
« z t*    <

S. _l oJ    Z uJ
s c z    c. >-
   C. UJ       «
z          z _/

   •" O _J    Z

— uJ    Z r- >•

<-       Z ^- Z
   D.

   C


O3 UJ
x a:
03
                                       a.

                                       o
                                                                           u
                                                                           X
                                                                           z
                                                                           z
                                                                    I UJ Z
                                                                     z —
                                                                        z
                                       a    r  »


                                      • O _» u-  - x u.
                        u- O.

                        *1 CT3 4
                                                                        uz
                                                                   > u e
                                                                   • u- a.
                                              i — UJEC zor  —
                                                                  k. X  O  «-
                                                                   ': «-     Z
                                    in
                                    u.u.u.u.u~u.u.u,u.
                                    OOOCOOCOC
                                    O O O O O O O I
                                    033
                                                               C. O O O  O
                                                         zzzzzzz
                                                                                                                                                ccc?
                                    oooeooooooooco
-------
«
x
•
u
z
Ul
o
<
z
a •-
N* p«
^- z
«J »- 3
ui «o
r- Ul Z
O 3 O
IE O —
ff ta4
-1 U
<« »- Ul
z o
uia >•
X 3»
Z O
o ^>
e a •>
» i: ui
>• O 3
z a
Ul 0 Ul
•o e
»o-
Ul «• t-
— . u
^ >- C5
»- u. O
CO 3
e
o
Ul
*»
«*
z
5-
C9
OCC3 «
o
o
o
tc. o- •»
u r>
ut O1
«•* O •"* ^
U >. I O
•— -
2 0> Ul
»*—•*••
u.
^
o.
•v
Ul
*-
u.
o
o
^ ^*
09
Ul •»
3
O
O Ul
»» B It »-
33 O1 O
Ul >.
o ui
0 »-
3U,

^*
u.
o
o
m ^*
< •*
£
>*l
»*••
•)
O* Ul
*-* f» H-
^. *- 2 *-
UJ V
a U*
ct *-
^u.
u
^»
u.
flu
*v
Ul
H-
u.
Ul
_J
1^*
^>
3
0
Ul
Q
Q
w •<
4
o
in
e-
in
0
•0
o
9
9
t»l
^
«
O
•
9
0
O-
9
cr
•*«•
B
9
ni
L PROCNG, PREPTN t ADV COMflSTN
DQUARTERS 28
3 Ul
U.X
in a
0 X
> — *
r Z
0 0
in r«
0> f>
•« K>
m
•
B
%
B
«M
O O
9 r»
9 0
—• r»
»o m
Kl ^
• •
— e-
•o nt
0 0
9 Al
O O
O- 0
9 f-
-• f<
« f>
*» •
— 0-
9 Al
Al 0
• " •
AL 28
L EXTRACTION
kDQUARTERS 2«
O 3 ui
*- u. X
3 00
O —X
z
0 0
r- 0-
Kl 9
m -o
ni
1
o
•
I
o
Al
1
e o
*- 0
o —
t» Al
« in
»^ ••
o- m
AI m
e o
Al Al
0 0
o <*•
^ m
1*1 «»
»- —
c> m
m >n
o o
• •
fAL 2«
/IR ASSESS OF CONVTNL ft ADV ENEROY SYS
kDQUARTERS 28
O Z Ul
•- Ul X
3 0 O
0 Al X
Z
o
0-
9
J)
Al
1
O
I
O
Al
t
O
0
m
m
•
tt
m
o
Al
O
o-
tn
»-.
in
^i
o
• •
CD
Al
-1
«
O
3
O
O O
• •
1 t
0 0
1 1
o e
0- 0-
B B
9 9
-C •*
e e
m in
0 0
e- o-
B B
9 9
»• •«•
e o
* • •
IE GAS SULPHUR OXIDE CONTROL
IDQUARTERS 6
AL 6
-1UI O
U. X t~
in o 3
ru x o
z
0 0
• •
tn in
KI >n
o o
^ fc
1 1
0 0
• •
1 1
o o
1 1
0 0
•n in
m 1*1
e o
«n «•>
o o
m •*
Al Al
e o
e o
«n m
9 9
m KI
0 0
• • •
fROGEN OXIDE CONTROL
IDQUARTERS 24
rAL 2«
— ku o
Z X *-
O O 3
•n x c
z
m in
• •
i i
in in
i i
0 0
0 0
0 0
B B
m M
0> »
O O
m in
o e
0 0
o e
B CO
e o
Al 
O O
• •
AL 1
N3PORT ft FATE OF ENEROY RELATED POLTNTS
DQUARTERS 3
O IT Ul
^- »- X
3 mo
O 9 X
Z
I

0 0
O f-
« «
» in
B B
O 9
• »
tn Al
O O
« —
0 0
O f-
•e r*i
9 in
. ,(
O 9
• •
f< A(
O O
• •
AL 3
IMNT SYS ft INSTRMNTN DVLP FOR ENRGY RELTD
QAUARTER6 1
0 •> Ul
•- XX
3 O-O
o m x
z
-------
        tr
        o
*• u z
CDC
tr O —
O. UJ •»
«- UJ O
z u
uj o »
X => tt
Z 03
o   —
EC 1C 00
*• I MJ
> O 3
Z   O
ui o «J
   op ec
« p-
« >-  c
*-u-  o
                   UJ O-
                ^. o —»-
                U >^ I O
                   O UJ
                  . «O IT H-
                  : e-   o
                     «n
                   e- u
                  . >-    »-
                  : c- >-O
                     tr u
                                                        *v
                                                        IT
                                                         I
                                                        O
                                                         •
                                                        -c
                                                                   o
                                                                    •
                                                                   a
                                   a
                                    •
                                   IV
                                           o
                                            •
                                           o
                                           o   o
                                           IX   IU
o   c-      ••
 •    »       »
a   w      •*
             e-
                                           00      CW
                                           •V   «V      —
                                        •9
                                        H-

                                        Z
                                        O
                                        C.
                                        ts
                                        cc
                                        z
                                       .U. UJ
                                       4k *-
                                        UJ e:
                                  O    UJ UJ    O
                                  <-    XX    •-
                                        tr> o
                                        inx
                                                        c
                                                        o.
                                                        o.
                                                                                                                                 oocs
                                                                  o
                                                                  UJ
-------
«
FORM 8
********A**********0***A*A<
(D)
INCH/DEC"
1980-19T<>
PFT OPFT » (OOt
0
e
>- o
CO **
w
3«*
a
n e uj
u CD or
>~ o
•M Iv
U U.
>- o a.
U 3 O
Z (D
UJ
^
^
Z U.
Of- a.
*" z
UJ » "*
•- UJ 2
O 3 O
a. uj a) o
or •• o
~J U O
*-su o »-
Z O •*•>"
UJ O >• X
31 3 CD •—
z «n >•
O i- tQ
or 03 so o" uj
> O 3 OB O- t-H.
Z 0 ^ — 20.
UJ O UJ UJ O
9 or a
a> e- or
» u u
«- u. a ^>
CO 3 U.
x a.
c
z
^^
o
e
CD < ^^
-.1- 3
0
o
-1
CD
ENERGY
ft********************************'
OU
CODE TITLE • Pf
o
m
O"
o
9
O
9
O
0
o
o
0>
e
o
e
9
e
9
e>
z
*»
•5
09 0
Nl05 FUEL PROCNOr PREPTN K »DV COf
HO HEADQUARTERS 5?
ooooo oo oo
in t- r^ o> o- in irv coco
O 1*1 K1 9 9 t»» 1*1 Al«l
«» p> rt « •«> oo -o «
—  c* in in oo 99 oo »•-
9 oo «•«• CD «o — -" oo oo •*> -a m
ooooooooooooo o
o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo e
o oo oo oo oo oo oo oo e
o oo o» o> o>o> eo oo .0 -C oo r-
ooooooooooooo o
e oo eo oo oo oo oc oo o
9 ni ni ni ni nt nt — —
iti
a
O OO OO OO OO OOafOOCQOO^O

o- »n «r> >- 9 9 oo oe> 992000.9900;
— o —-•-•—— — -~ •—*.— — a.
or 002
in or uj uj
Z c »-
•U ^C Or
o oo .00 _jo e oo eezoe_joeoe
z or K >- _i
«• o *- z u >
u z »- or o
-i O -I UJ
Z UJ _) U O Z Z
•- o o o. uj •-
> •• tr uj • Z
S X *- <~ & to. f
o o z « >- o «t
U O _J _l >-
or u 3 w uj «o
z u. 3 «j or »- z
O O X UJ *• « —
•" O. O •- >• u.
c— «o *o « _»« j-i co ar» on «o « m
utr nor 3or X«E •< a arar ««ar or
^t BU ttLf *• ' 03 1^ O UJ Q. UJ Z UJ UJ ^^ UJ
or ^~ co ^* £•• ^ ^^ uj ^ ^^ ^* *^* ^*
^- or cocr caer zor coor or arer «rj ou
x •< «t « •< < uj-< •« « u. •« o < d|
U 3 3 U3 03 03 03 O. 3 *- •
_i a_iara_i a _i o o _i a_i a j « o _i 3 •
< _j o < ~ c. < uio < oro < uj o « too «t zo < x ^
O 3uJ O ZUJ C «JUJ O -*^ UJ O *1UJ O U.UJ O OrUI O COuj
fc- U.Z >- UJX >- U.X •- ZZ f- U.X 1- UJX *- >-X »- XX
3 oo 3 oa 3 mo 3 oe 3 mo 3 oo 2 in a 2 oo
o — x c AIX c fwx o »"x o KIX o 9X o 9X o inx
zzzzzzzz
-------
         cc
         o
 u

 UJ
 ts
 z
 o
uj r.
t- UJ Z
030
tr O —
Cv UJ in
   ff kM
-J    U
-« »- UJ
»- u»e.
z u
UJ O >-
I => C
Z C
O    f-
ct o m
•" I UJ
> o »
r    e-
UJ O Itl
   ec
•5 O-
UJ •• *~
H-    UJ
« >- C3
O
UJ
      r>
      c
   CC cr «

   yj O*

 es x.  i *-
 «-«r e u.
   ij • CL
   z e- o
                       c
                 •» e uj
                 t>» or
                       o u.
                       O CL
                       => O
      •3

*^ »*•   ^>
ED » >- b.
^.— 20.
      U O
      E
      or
                                                           fu
                                                           in
                                                            i
                                                     M

                                                      I
                                                           O
                                                            •
                                                           rv
                                                           «
                                                           c-
                            o   o

                            e   o
                                          m
                                          m
            e

            o
                                           • —    —      ci
                                          o
                                          CL
                                         M
                                         1C
                                         K

                                         UJ

                                         U.
                                         o

                                         •as
                                         X S
                                         •~ o
                        < <    c-
                        IfcJ U    O
                        Z X    •-

                        mo    ~
z
c
CL
CL
                                                                                                                                     0071
                                                                     C
                                                                     UJ
                                                                     X
-------
-------
                    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

     1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)                     HQ   ORD    MEDIA: Energy
 Fuel Processing,  Preparation and Advanced
 Combustion (N105)                   	REG-	APPRO:
 B)  LONG RANGE GOALS & MAJOR OBJECTIVES
 Long Range Goals:   Assure that adequate pollution control technology is
 developed and evaluated and  effluent and emission s'tandards recommended prior
 to commercialization  of emerging energy processes (fluidized-bed combustion
 (FBC),  coal gasification and liquefaction,  coal preparation, oil- shale proc-
 essing  and advanced oil processes).

 Major Objectives;

 1.  Develop methods for sampling and analysis and continuous monitoring of
 emissions and effluents from emerging energy technologies.
 2.  Characterize emissions and effluents from existing bench scale,  pilot
 plant and demonstration facilities.
 3.-  Develop at bench  scale and evaluate performance of pollution control
 technology associated  with emerging  energy  processes.

 0)  FT  78 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

     Initial (level 1)  sampling activities completed on two  low-Btu coal
    ifiers (Wilputte—Chapman  and Wellman-Galusha).
     Standard of Practice manual for  the Solvent Refined Coal (SRC)  coal
 liquefaction process  completed (describes the process,  environmental controls
 and expected., discharges).
 3.   Completed base-line environmental tests at GPU-Penelec  Homer
 City, Pa.  physical coal cleaning site.
 4.   Construction of the chemically active fluidized bed (CAFB)  demonstration at
 San Benito,  Texas  was  completed (startup scheduled  for  October  1978).
 5.   Initiated cleanup  studies  for particulate control  on Miniplant  (FBC)  using
 ceramic  baghouse.                         _  .
 6.   Completed environmental  assessment .o'f Paraho  shale  oil  surface retorting
 process.

 D)   FT 79  PROGRAM  DESCRIPTION

 FT79 Activities  and Planned  Accomplishments.
 1.   Evaluate  effectiveness of  existing  available pollution  control techniques
 for  synthetic  fuels processing.
 2.   Update data  base for New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for fluidized
 bed  combustion  (FBC) based on  environmental assessment  (EA)* at  Rivesville and
 Georgetown University boiler.
 3.   Conduct comprehensive  analysis of emissions from the Wellman-Galusha  and
Willputte-Chapman  low Btu  coal  gasification processes.

   tvironmental Assessment  (EA)  studies  synthesize and evaluate information on
_ rgy and industrial processes  to aid  EPA in  selecting optimized environmental
 goals and policies  to attain these goals.  EA  studies quantify all sources of
residuals; anticipate the  severity of associated environmental risks; provide
preliminary targets for environmental goals; and assess the ability  of    .-j0-  -
existing control methods to attain these goals.                              ' "
-------
                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FORM 1:  DECISION UNIT OVERVIEW
 A)  DECISION UNIT TITLE (AND CODE)
  Fuel Processing, Preparation and Advanced
  'Combustion (Ni 05)                	
HQ   OKD

REG.
MEDIA: Energy

APPRO:
  4.  Conduct bench scale tests for pollution control methods and devices for
  the Paraho retorting of oil shale.
  5.  Characterize effectiveness of existing add-on devices for cleanup on the
  Georgetown University boiler and the 3MW Argonne FBC.
  6.  Conduct EA on Lurgi high, medium and low-Btu coal  gasification processes.
  7.  Conduct EA of SRC II coal liquefaction process.
  8.  Conduct preliminary EA of chemically active fluidized-bed (CAFB)  demon-
  stration on oil, including bioassay screening.
  9.  Identify research requirements of the coal  cleaning program.
  10. Evaluate FBC solid disposal methods.

  Description of Considered Alternatives.

  1.  Considered duplicating existing facilities  to simulate real vorld
  emissions.

  The benefits would be that we would not  have to depend on the Department of
  Energy or the private sector for access  to facilities.   This  was  deemed too
  costly and would not allow adequate coverage of the diversity of  real world
  processes.

  2.  Considered relying on the private sector 'and the Department of Energy to
  provide all data.

  The benefits would be a reduction in required resources.   Consequences would
  be loss in government expertise as well  as the  use of  unverified  data.

  3.  Selected option most cost effective  at each level.
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL  ANALYSIS
 , DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  COPE         MO       MEOIAj ENERGY
N105  FUEL PROCNt, PREPTN I  ADV COMBSTN          APPRDf R &  D
           • ^•^••••»W* W ~ ™ * •* ™ • * * * ** • • W • • • •* • • •> * W • • ^ W • • IP ** IP • (B W ** * •* <• • • •* •* * • V • • •*
B, RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY 76 ACT FY 79 C.  E.  FY  bO INCR   FY 80 CUM
         POSITIONS  PFT         52.0         43.0         32.0         32.0
 LEVEL              OPFT          6.0         10.0          6.0          6.0
01 OF  05            FTE                      aj.e         46.1         «6. 1
   BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)   19,478.0     11,949.0      N962.0     6,962,0
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY.  DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.

  1.  Develop methods for sampling  and analysis and continuous monitoring of
  emissions to quantify total organics,  characterize toxics and determine in-
  organic compounds.
  2.  Environmental assessment activities will be continued in oil shale, FBC,
  physical coal cleaning, synthetic fuels from coal and  advanced oil processes.
  This will include characterization of  emissions and incorporation of health,
  ecological and economic data associated with ongoing processing facilities,
  such as Anvil Points (oil shale), Elvesville (FBC), Homer City (coal cleaning)
  University of Minnesota (synfuels from coal) and San Benito (advanced oil
  process).
  3.  Control technology activities will be  continued in oil shale, physical
  coal cleaning, synthetic fuels  from coal and advanced  oil processes.
  A.  Standard support plans will be developed and provided to air, water and
  solid waste offices for physical  coal  cleaning, synthetic fuels from coal,
  FBC and oil shale processes.
  5.  Preliminary effluent and emission  standard recommendations will be made to
  air and water standard setting  offices in  the area of  coal cleaning, synthetic
  fuels from coal,  FBC and oil shale.

  Benefits of Funding at this level;
  1.  Recommendations  will  be provided  to  effluent/emissions standard setting
  offices for emerging energy technologies.
  2.  Wide distribution of  quarterly  reports  to make environmental assessment
  (EA) data available  to industry  and government policy makers.
  3.  More confidence  in EA data generated.
  4.  Earlier determination of environmental  problem areas.

  Consequences of not  funding at this level;
  1.  Delay in commercialization of environmentally acceptable emerging energy
  technologies.
  2.  Increased  cost of retrofit of and less  than adequate performance of
  pollution control devices.
                                                                   o . -;•
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2J  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSIS

A. DECISION UNIT TITLE  ANU CODE          HQ      MEDIA:
N105  FUEL PROCNG, PREPTN & ADV COMBSTN          APPROf R  &  D
M> M M » • v • W • •• M M 4B 0 • • • • • W • • 4V • V <• V 4V ^ " V • V 
-------
                    ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY

        2:  DECISION! UNIT  LEVEL  ANALYSIS
   .  DECISION  UNIT TITLE AND  CODE         HQ       MEDIAj  ENERGY
  N105  FUEL PROCNG, PREPTN &  AOV COMBSTN          APPROj  R &  D
  — ****<********™***i*"B**—*ll**—'••'•••••'•••^'••^•••••••^••••••••••^•••^^^^•^•••^^•••^^^•i
  B,  RESOURCE  SUMMARY       FY  78 ACT  FY 79 C.  E.  FY  80  INCR    FY 60  CUM
           POSITIONS  PFT         52.0          U3.0          4.0          U3.0
   LEVEL             OPFT          6.0          JO.O                       10,0
  03  OF  05            FTE                       fll.8          2.0          57.3
      BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)     19,47B.O     11,9
-------
                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY

FORM  2:  DECISION UNIT LEVEL ANALYSTS
A. PECIS10N UNIT  TITLE  AMU CODE         HQ
N105  PUEL PROCNG,  PREPTN  & ADV COMRSTN          APPROf  R i D

B. RESOURCE SUMMARY       FY 76 ACT  FY 79 c.  E.  FY  PO  INCR    FY so  cu*
         POSITIONS   PFT         52.0          43.0          4,0         47,0
 LEVEL              OPFT          8.0          10.0                      10,0
04 OF  05            FTE                       41.6          4,0         61 ,3
   BUDGET AUTH.  (000.0)    19,478.0     11,9(19.0      1,195.0     13,144,0
   C. DESCRIBE THE INCREMENTAL ACTIVITIES OF THIS LEVEL ONLY. DESCRIBE THE BENEFITS
     OF FUNDING AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FUNDING.


   1.  New waste disposal methods associated with  coal beueficiation will be
   evaluated.
   2.  Include environmental  assessment activities at additional industrial
   coal gasifiers  to  strengthen the low Btu coal gasification data base.
   3.  Assessment  of  air pollution control technologies required for in-situ
   coal gasification.
   4.  Expansion of data base for FBC through characterization of particulate
   control devices on DOE industrial FBCs.

   Benefits of funding at this level:
  1.  The environmental  impact of emerging energy  technologies will be
  determined at an accelerated pace.  Data will be provided sis months earlier
  for coal cleaning,  AFBC, and low-Btu coal gasification.

  Consequences of not funding at this level:
  1.  Delay in defining necessary pollution control  technology for AFBC, coal
  cleaning and low-Btu coal gasification.
-------



















u
2
UJ
e

>•
z a:
o «
«-« i
H- i
U =1
UJ 03
*-
O OJ
IT U
Ci. CC
_! O
« 05
>- UJ
Z CC
UJ
z -«
0 Z
CC 5
> Z
z o
09 —
UJ 
c

z
s-
0. Z
o »-
-1C.
UJ Ul
> cc
o
•
z
X U
o o
CE 
B ^"*


e «
fw —
•e r-
o- o-
fc «
B —


c  W *£ O O *•
p- KI rio-
* * ^ *
B •• f^ «




e * 9 * e> o —
*V C* f\» •• t\J ^D ^
o- f»tn o-
« » « .



O -t> 9 B O O B
O- —f-B Kl O —
9 —l»> nj 9 »• 9
o- o- o •<
— — oru


0 0 OtWOO
B 9 9 in IV B
*•*- f» 9 B >n
9 ^ B f\J
•» ^ « ^
c- n> «9
— — .






e
e
•» H- H Ul
in*' _>•— u. a. >-
0 « C £L OU.
• in c e »•'•-
u. X oj r> o

S O < *•« CO
— <• Z tr Z
e >- o> o
*- Z X >- —
_J UJ ••• UJ < ^~
uj c> «- »^ _; —
> C t- OJ
U>=> Z5 G
_Jtr oc.
0 B
9 in
in *
>» r\
o m
o *
9 tr\
in *
»- •*
o m


O B
9 V>
m «
v^ v*t
fc %
e tv


O CD
• •
9 m
m -c
y«K *t
« »
O At

049B OOf,
9 ni — in e- o«n
in »*» fi ^ ^^ *• in
»- B C1 «
« * * »
O ** B t>j
••



o o e> «v o o »>j
M K> C- 9 ^. 9 &
r- 9 r* «
•• »



O 4D 9 CD 0 OB
O- — f^ CC. W O «-
9 «M f* fV 9 •• 9
p- P- o «
— — 0 W


e o of\i e o
B e « m tv B
t— »t 9 B in
9 •* B M
• » * %
•O- «W * 9
•*• -••






"S
o
. ft t~ U. UJ
tn *^ .> ^^ u. CL. ^
c « o c_ ou.
.UJ or o »^ w
U. X OJ 3 O
o >- 3 r o» -
r> o-« «< «
fW « X CC Z
c *- «r> o
>- Z X >. w
^ UJ ••* U* «< ^>
4tl C9 ^^ *' - ' «^
> C •- tn
UJ ^ Z> O
_J CC O C.
c »—
0- B
9 rw
o- -c
— «VJ
o ^>
0- B
9 rvi
P- -O
— eo«
P- — "^ B t* O »-
9 p- m «w 9 — tn
P- O- O- «
» fe * *
*^» «• p- Al
••



o o o p- o o
tnp-«M9 n
— — o«v
^ —



O •« 9 B O OB
tr ~r^^r*o —
9 «••« «W 9 — 9
P- P- 0 0
.._ c «v


e o o i\i o o
B 9 9 «niWB
9^ f> 9 B m
9 ^ B M
» fe * »
p- tu««r
•• ••






e
e
0» •>- U. UJ
»>»» _) ~ U. JL <-
e « on. ou.
• Ul CC O *^ w
U. X B S 0
O *- 3 Z « —
3 0« «-05
••» « X C Z
o »- oj o
«- Z X >- «•
_IUJ •« UJ « >-
UJ c> — — _» —
> O >- 05
Ju- => => C
_j cc on.
o «
9 *«
9 P-
— B
•»! tV
O «
9 —
9 P-
— B
£ «


0 «
9 «
9 P-
— B
•, fk
W CM


O -t>
• •
9 — •
9 p
— B
* *
r* TV

O •£ 9 ^ O ^^ ^^
9 o »~ — r- c —
9 « f» P- 9 "• «
— — P- B
^ » ^ «
Ki fU O «\l
«- —



o o op- e o
m in o rv a a
— • — • o ni
J^ •




p- -»f- B ft e —
9 - >r*t ni o " 9
p- p- c *
•" •• o ni


o o o ru oo
B 9 9 in OIB
*- m 9 B m
9 « B »
U. X 05 S> 0
O •- => Z o» —
3 O « *» B
9 « rnr, z
e f- ej o
*• Z X >- M
_J UJ -• UJ < *-
UJ Cd ^^ «v _i »^
> 0 t- B
U! O P O
_j c on.
      I
      c-
DC7S
-------
o
z
uu
O
<
Z
c
UJ
r-
O

a!
z >
UJ Q.

H
o §
si
> M
Z w
UJ K

  UJ
  O
  O
  CJ
  z
  D

  Z
  O
  C/5

  CJ
  UJ
  Q
  'CC
  n
00
^
0) Q
C if&
J-J ggj


.. a!
< 0
S <




a
o




d
a uj
~ CE












/-N
O
rH

e
o
a
3
.2
S
o
•o
0
c
a

^3
^g

"S

— 03
UJ
o c
O 0
U-H
_ u
C3
? r*
< «
— ' O.
UJ CO
u u
HSU

^^ A
r- CO
-£ C
2 co
2 CO
_ ci)
2 o
tfl O
UJS-
01
< 3






r-
Z
UJ
2
I]
a.
5
0
U
u
^
UJ
P
<
-J
13
2?
a
O
03
^

^
U.







_J
UJ
^j


n
UJ

UJ
y

_j
UJ
UJ
J

1
_J
UJ
^
UJ
-1

N

~
UJ
^
UJ
-J
H

,
UJ

UJ
o -;
" O
> a:
a. c.
UJ
_ K
5 <

U» ^U







UJ
G-
^
V?
^
at
2

cfl
UJ

L^
•"
r~
^
•z
Ui

X
C/3
Zj
a.
O
U
u

CD
<

1






CTN CT\ CS rH ^ O1^ O f~*
^^ ^^ ^tQ ^p ^Q ^N» " Q2 QQ
f^ ^~l F*H f^ fH ^^ rH ?™i
en o ooooo o
CN CN CNfimi-HCN CN
rH rH OOOOrH O


0\ 0\ CNrHrHOO iH
^^ r^* ^r^ ^*^ oo ^^ co oc
rn o OOOOO O
CN CN OOCnCTvrHCN CN
rH r-> OOOOrH O


O\ CTl OrHrH OrH O''
r~ p- oooeooooo O
rH i-i OrHrHrHrH O
m o ooooo o
CN CN OWCTvrHCN O
rH rH OOOOrH O

O\ cr> OOOOO O
P^ P*. OOOOOO O
rH rH OOO rHO Oj
, S- W rl E £ C
4-1 iJ C CO O CO 60 00 O COCO rH O
jj cj iJ o -u -H rH i-i sc a. coca 03 -H
OrflOMW'OtB C «i-4^H CD COCO OW
<4H-ua.T-, 1- C >-i rH -H CD C CJ CJ U << £ -H
COCO CO JJ O • S COO rH rH C O"H
WrH C>OO^H CO OO CD OO UtH.
•uT3cgeocoe>«-' COTJ s aes iwco
COC"*H OCJ'H COCO 7*4 rH CO £&* fct) !0 4J
rHCSXJ TJ C r-* 03 J^ COCS 9] COOW
B-HcD'OCcoo co o*JO-i-iaj CJT; rH o
3 SO C •UCceCOO rH -H OOOhOi-i CO TH CO CO - — 1
CJC-H WCOrHCJ CDrH C O O S3 !-t N 3 JJO)
^^ ^4 ^^ O 4H CJ ^H .2 *r4 rH £^ rH CX ^ CO *?H tM PS C£ I
e a -u s s CSCQCOQCJ 4:1-1 iJ
>, 03 rH cocco ^
COCJCJ fHCQOCJ • O*2 OCOC^C »C SC.COCH CO ZC££
u a co f-H CB ,-v w ^: a) ^: D en .u eu w cu .=
InrHg 3COCO«rHCO -HrH rHOSCHc 1>-'
O' ^ *^ ^ ^8 T3 fe ^ ^3 £&} ^ U ^H C^ O &^ |IH ^^ CO

. » • * • . •
                                                                                   k
-------
o

UJ
H-
O
UJ
Z >
£ C

il

ii
> W
2 C/5
UJK

  LU
  O
  o
  o
  2
  U
  LU
  C
X
00
(U o
c "S
.. s.
< 0
LJ c.
S <





c
EX
c




C ut











u-i
O
Z
x"'
c
0
tc
o
U
•O
Qj
U

UJ
_l


s
o _,-
C
u. c.
UJ
H-
en «|
> (/5
U. LU





UJ
cc

V)

UJ
^
J
LU
•J
h*>
.

^
2
UJ
^
»
C/5

_J
^
2
0
u
u
*
CD







OCO i— 1 O O i— 1 O i-l *H OO O
CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO COCO CO
OOO O OCOOO O OO O
f^ ^i CT\ ^D xO ^^ ^J o> C*J CO *^T C»4 ^^
OOO O OOOOO O OiH i-l

OOO i-l CO^HOr-i ^n OC O
CDCOCO co cocooocpco co coco co
OCO O OOOOO O OO O
f"** PO O^ ^D \G ^5 C1^ C^ ^J CO "^ CS ^H
OOO O OOOOO O Oi-i iH

OOO O OO^OO O OO O
cocooo o eoeoeocoo O OO O
i-l i— 1 i— i C iH iH <— 1 iH O O CO O
OCO 0 OOOOO O CO O
r^» P"J C^N o so socNC^c o co o
OOO O OOOOO O OO O

OOO 0 OOOOO O OO O
cooco o cooooeco o oc c
^OiH O r-ir^C^-C O OO C
OCO C OCCCC O CC C
r^OO-i O vOvCOCT>O C CO O
OOC O OOOOO O OC C

'









1 I
CD 03 C 05 03
co to — j a *o a)
a) a i LJ -H LJ iw 03 i
CO 03 03 C C- CD O CD U-H
03 03 JJ co a. -o a) aw
^ ^ C C* C* ±J C CDCJU-i*t3-toW
ti co set-* a co o o oj a
c c E o OT cs o i— i w alb ja c c.
O O 03 < — I O. 03 CO CB.4J -H
-rt-Hffi BSBLiCLO aiC-O O
jj.ua) eo c T3 3Uca> > at> 
•H IH C o JJ co c,Lji«4Ja" ma) eoca'"S "«
03 JJ 03 iJ O O i- -U 3Q WO vwiH 03 > Vj CT?
CBWeDW-H W O «3 CO "O OS O W dia OiH O O
uouo-ui c« c. c ^- c. a- jj u^ «-. ^
C.C.U C. CO 03 C3 01 C. IbiiHt-lc; 33iHC OCO C3C6 X COW
4J ££ W p£ IM J>J -*^ w CO *H W CC tb CO ^H CO O W O ^ ^
S3 -H OJ W C LJ CQ C i— C U C >s Z*iHC
I JJ 03 J-l 3 O O CO Q*QUUCO S- O UiH WO
SCICCTO. •OQ. "O 0) CiH-HTS-n -HiH Ei— I M-l CUC
o a) c a; -H cu 001 w IH cscguwcuw 4J a com o c es eacouiHnco>£.. ceo >cuo~3 corn
^*^ ^•*1' ^-^ "O CJ --W O -"H CO *H >••» ^J H3 5 ^ .£• C "-.-.C W •^J « 3
<3E w u,ci*-.ifiB.iOcnc/3
-------
O
•z.
LU
O
<

z
O
h-
O
LU
t-
c
CC
C.
s
LU
CO


LU
S


£2
3
a.


O
U
CJ
    2
    g

    £2
    u
    OJ
    Q


>s
00
4) S
C ^
w c£
.. — '
< o
LU Z
2 <


S
o

d
C LU
• c











z

c
o
•H
JJ
to
-3
g
• 5
u
•o
CU
u
c
0}
^
•o


*?
s
•H
LU C
Q 0

{g
O ^j
z a
< ft
— 
LU
-1
I
"H
— u
LU
^
LU
H


^
LU
_J
o
o -;
- o
> c
u. a.


LU
^
« <

*~ ^
> iO
U. LU






LU
cc
3
00
^
LU
S

OO
IU

L^
«•
H-
^
v
LU
&
^*
V3
CCOMPLI
<

o









O O
CO CO
i— 1 i— 1
0 O
n i-i
o o
o o
CO 00
^•4 ^H
o o
on f"^
0 0


o o
eo O
^ 0
0 O
en O
C 0
o o
0 0
0 O
o c
o o
0 0

















u
1-1
u £ 1
4) CO CU CU
C tJ oo a
0 C 0 ,C *