£7A
   Structural and  Functional Aspects  of the
   Ecology of Submerged! Aquatic tfacrophyte
   Communities  in  the Lower  Chesapeake Bay
   Volume  2
                                                                      PB89-134555
   Virginia Inst.  of Marine  Science
   Gloucester Point
   Prepared for

   Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Annapolis,  MD
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region III Information Resource
Csr:t3r (3PM52)
84! Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA  19107
   Aug  82
                                                                                  J
                                                                 EPA Report Collection
                                                                 nformation Resource Center
                                                                 US EPA Region 3
                                                                 Philadelphia, PA  19107

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Pirate rtiiJ /m/mrr:<>m cm Ihr n-irfii tn/ufr cumfilt l
1  RfPORT NO
    EPA/600/3-88/051b
             3 RECIPIENT'S ACC
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE  STRUCTURAL & FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS  OF  THE
 ECOLOGY OF SUBMERGED AQUATIC MACROPHYTE COMMUNITIES IN
 THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY.  Volume II: Submarine Light
 Quantity & Quality  in the  Lower Chesapeake Bay &  Its	
7 AUTHORISI  Potential  Role in the Ecology of Submerged
           Seagrass  Communities
    Robert F.  Tine and Richard L. Wetzel, Eds.
                        f rfS°5 5 /AS
             S REPORT OATS
                 August  1982
             « PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
    Virginia  Institute of Marine Science
    School of Marine Science
    College of William and Mary
    Gloucester Point, MD   23062
              PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
                                                           10 PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
             11 CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
    EPA  Chesapeake  Bay program
    2083 West  Street
    Annapolis,  MD   21401
             13. TVPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
             14 SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                   EPA/600/05
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16 ABSTRACT
          The  research reported on in this volume is concerned with the underwater
     light environment and its relationship  to submerged aquatic vegetation.
     Since light  energy is the force by which all ecosystems are driven and  since
     it  has been  suggested by some researchers that the light environment  of  the
     Chesapeake Bay has deteriorated coincident with declining SAV distribution,  a
     research  program was devised to analyze the underwater light environment of
     the lower Chesapeake Bay with respect to seagrasses.  As estuarine waters are
     frequently heavily laden with both autochthonous and allchthonus loads  of
     both organic and inorganic suspended and dissolved materials—all of  which
     affect the spectral distribution of light underwater—we determined it  was
     important to measure not only white light, but also specific light energies
     across the entire photosynthetically  significant portion of the spectrum.

          The  results of these studies along with an analysis of past and  present
     research  on  this topic reported for the Chesapeake Bay, a primer on aquatic
     optics and a comparative report on underwater irradiance in a tropical
     seagrass  bed are presented in this report.
17.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                          c.  COSATi Field'Group
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

           RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19 SECURITY CLASS fTlni Ktporll
    UNCLASSIFIED
Iblf
                                              20 SECURITY CLASS
                                                  UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                        22. PRICE
   t*** 2220-1 (R«». 4-77)   PKCVIOU* COITION n O>»OLCTC

-------
                      NOTICE

This document has been reviewed in accordance with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and
approved for publication.  Mention of trade names
or commercial products does not constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.
                       l-Ji

-------
                                                              August  1982

                                 Final Report
            , STKUCTUKAL AND  KUNCT10NAL ASPECTS 01-  THE ECOLDCY
                OF SUBMERGED AQUATIC MACROPHYTE COMMUNITIES
            i               THS LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY1
                                   Volume II
     Submarine Light Quantity and Quality in the Lower Cheaa'p&aM^ay  and
     Its Potential Role in the Ecology of Submerged Seagrass CpBnmjTiifiics
X
               Robin F. van Tine, and Richard L. Wetzel, Editora
                                                                 •
                     .Virginia Institute of Marine Science       < 
-------
                                 Final Report
               STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE ECOLOGY
                OF SUBMERGE!, \QUATIC MACROPHYTE COMMUNITIES IN
                           THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY1
                                   Volume II
     Submarine Light Quantity and Quality in the Lower Chesapeake Bay and
     Its Potential Role in the Ecology of Submerged Seagrass Communities
               Robin F. van Tine, and Richard L. Wetzel, Editors
                     Virginia Institute of Marine Science
                           School of Marine Science
                          College of William and Mary
                          Gloucester Point, VA  23062
                     Contract Nos. R8US974 and X003245-01
                                Project Officer
                               Dr. David Flemer
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                               2U83 West Street
                             Annapolis, Md.  21401


^Special Report No. 267 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering,
 Virginia Institute of Marine Science.
                                       I.'

-------
                                    PREFACE

     The research reported on in this volume is concerned with  the  underwater
light environment and its relationship to submerged aquatic vegetation.   Since
light energy is the force by which all ecosystems are driven and uince  it has
been suggested by some researchers that, the light environment of the
Chesapeake Bay has deteriorated coincident with declining SAV distribution,  a
research program was devised to analyze the underwater light environment  of
the lower Chesapeake Bay with respect to secgrasses.  As estuarine  waters are
frequently heavily laden with both autochthonous and allochthcnous  loads  of
both organic and inorganic suspended and dissolved materials—all of which
affect the spectral distribution of light underwater—we determined it  was
important to measure not only white light, but also specific light  energies
across the entire photosynthetically significant portion of the spectrum.

     The results of these studies along with an analysis of past and present
research on this topic reported for the Chesapeake Bay, a primer on aquatic
optics and a comparative report on underwater irradiance in a tropical
seagrass bed are presented in this report.

     It is hoped that the results presented in this document will be an aid  to
those charged with managing the Chesapeake Bay and a stimulus for further
research.
                                                Robin van Tine
                                                Gloucester.Point, VA
                                                August 1982
                                      i-C

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The authors would like to take this opportunity  to  thank  some of  the many
people who helped in various phases of  the  research reported herein:   Bill
Cook and Walt Valentine, formerly of the Chesapeake Bay  Program  for their
unusually enthusiastic support and ideas; Rick Hoffman,  Denise Mosca and Sandy
Sotsky for their technnical help in the field and  lab; Mike Castagna and the
staff of the V.I.M.S. Wacha^reague field station for  physical  support; Mike
Bender for financial supporc for one of us  (R.v.T.) allowing the completion of
the analysis of data and writing of this report; Gene Silberhorn for Wetlands
Department boat time; Dennis Clark of KOAA  for his helpful suggestions and
preliminary analysis of the underwater  irradiance  at  Vaucluse  Shores;  Nancy
White and Carole Knox and the V.I.M.S. Word Processing staff for their
tireless retyping of endless revisions of this report.

     Finally and especially we would like to thank our wives,  Melissa van Tine
and Beverly Wetzel and our children, Tristan van Tine, Paige and Chris Wetzel
lor chier support and understanding during many long  absences  in the field,
and many long nights and weekends in the lab, at the  computer  center and
during much time spent scribbling on yellow pads.
                                      ii

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                         Page

PREFACE	     i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	    ii

CHAPTER 1.  Light in Aquatic Environments: A Review of Basic Concepts
            R. F. van Tine	     1

     Introduction	„	     2
     Some Basic Physics and Terminology 	 	     2
     Some Properties and Concepts of Optical Oceanography .......     5
     Temporal Variations in Light Energy Distribution 	    20
     Literature Cited	    26

CHAPTER 2.  Light and Submerged Macrophyte Communities in the
            Chesapeake Bay: A Scientific Summary
            R. L. Wetzel, R. F. van Tine and P. A. Penhale.	    29

     Introduction	    30
     Light in the Chesapeake Bay	    36
     Light and Photosynthesis in Chesapeake Bay SAV Communities ....    59
     Summary	    80
     Literature Cited 	    82

CHAPTER 3.  The Underwater Light Environment of Shallow Regions of
            the Lower Chesapeake Bay, its Relationship to Seagrasses
            and its Potential for Benthic Primary Productivity
            R. F. van Tine and R. L. Wetzel	    89

     Introduction	«	    90
     Method	    93
     Results	    96
     Discussion 	 . 	 ..........   137
     Conclusions	   140
     Literature Cited 	   141

CHAPTER 4.  Spectral Distribution and Attenuation of Underwater Light
            in a Tropical Mangrove Creek and Seagrass Bed, Laguna de
            Terminos, Campeche, Mexico: A Preliminary Analysis
            R. F. van Tine and R. L. Wetzel	   144

     Introduction	•	   146
     Methods	   146
     Results	   146
     Discussion 	 ..........   150
     Summary	   152

-------
              Chapter 1


   LIGHT IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS:

     A REVIEW OF BASIC CONCEPTS




           R. F. van Tine
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
     College of William and Mary
     Gloucester Point, VA  23062

-------
                         LIGHT IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS
                                 INTRODUCTION

     The stuiy of the interaction of solar energy with the watery milieu
necessitates not only an understanding of the properties of light and H20 but
must also take into account the myriad living and non-living entities, both
dissolved and suspended, which impinge upon the propagation of light in
aquatic environments.  During the hundred years since the first crude
underwater measurements of light were made with photographic plates,
technological evolution has provided a vast array of increasingly
sophisticated measuring devices.  Complex and competitive sets of
terminologies coevolved with the instrumentation resulting in a rather
confusing body of knowledge for the non-specialist.

     In this section the author intends to unravel and clarify enough of the
assumptions and jargon of marine optics to provide a basic conceptual
framework to allow the reader to understand light research in the Chesapeake
Bay and elsewhere and relate it to submerged aquatic vegetation.

Some Basic Physics and Terminology

     The sun emits electromagnetic radiation in discrete packets or quanta (Q)
of energy termed photons.  The energy content (e) of each quantum is directly
proportional to the frequency (v),

                                     e - hv

and indirectly proportional to the wavelength (*),
                                        he
                                   e  -~T~

where _h is Planck's universal constant and £ is the speed of light in a
vacuum.  This means that quanta of shorter wavelengths contain more energy
than quanta of longer wavelengths.

     The spectral energy distribution of incoming solar radiation at both the
top of the earth's atmosphere and the surface of the planet, for a clear sky,
is shown in Fig. la (Gates, 1971).  Most of the energy reaching the earth's
surface is contained within the shorter wavelengths (.4-10 u or 400-1000
nanometers^ (nm)J.  Not surprisingly, this also includes the region of
greatest biological import—visible light, approximately 350-750 nm (Table I
1 nm " 10'3

-------
                                                      (A)
                     500    1000          2000
                             WAVELENGTH  (nm)
3000
            _ 10 1

            *«-*
          -£
          sS  '  H
          
-------
                  Table I



Approximate Wavelength Ranges of Colors
      Color
(nm)
      Ultraviolet




      Violet




      Blue




      Green




      Yellow




      Orange




      Red




      Infrared
<380




380-450




450-490




490-560




560-590




590-630




630-760




>760

-------
lists the approximate wavelength ranges  for  perceived  color).   In fact,
visible light is the only portion of  the electromagnetic  spectrum which
appreciably penetrates  seawater - with  the exception of very high frequency
x-rays and very low frequency radio waves  (Fig.  Ib) (Williams,  1970).   If the
quanta distribution and the energy distribution  are compared (Fig.  2)  for the
Photosynthetically Available Radiation  (usually  defined as  400-700  nm  and
termed (PAR or PhAR) it can be seen that the relative  quanta and  energy
distributions differ in accordance with  the  physical nature of  light.   By
integrating quanta and  energy over the  PAR
        700
       ;*dQ,
QPAB -I—-
                    'PAR -
                            dX
                            400
                                                 700
                             dX
                             400
and expressing the results as a ratio, comparisons can be made  between
differing water bodies (Fig. 3), sky conditions, depth, etc.  (Morel  and  Smith,
1974; Jerlov, 1976; Dubinsky and Berman, 1979).  Notice that  the energy
content per quantum decreases from clear oceanic to more turbid coastal  waters
(Fig. 3).

     The most useful units and conversions  for working with marine optics  are
listed in Table II.  Only radiometric units are shown and not those  for
photometry (illumination, lumens, candles,  lux, etc.) since the latter are
biased for the "average human eye" and are  not truly convertible to  absolute
energetic or quantum values.  Recent measurements of light  for  ecological  and
biological purposes are almost always made  as irradiance. i.e.  the flux  of
energy or quanta per unit area.  It is especially appropriate to use  quanta
measurements in biological or ecological studies since that is  what  organisms
respond to.

Some Properties and Concepts of Optical Oceanography

     The properties and concepts of optical oceanography are  usually  divided
into two mutually exclusive classes: (1) inherent and (2) apparent.   Inherent
properties, such as absorption and scattering, are independent  of changes  in
insolation (incoming light), whereas apparent properties, such  as underwater
irradiance, vary with changing solar and atmospheric conditions.  Figure 4
illustrates some of the interrelationships  between these properties  and  other
parameters (Zaneveld, 1974).

     Inherent Optical Properties

     As light passes through the water column its energy content and  spectral
quality are changed by absorption and scattering due to the water molecules
themselves, dissolved substances and suspended particles.  The  combined  effect
of these processes is termed attenuation and can be measured by a beam
transmissometer (see Fig. 5).  The ideal transmissometer emits  a collimated
(parallel) beam of light which is allowed to pass through the environment  for
a known distance and is then measured by a  photocell after the  scattered
(non-parallel) rays are eliminated by a system of lenses and apertures.  The
circuitry of modern instruments, after compensating for ambient light,

-------
          w/m2  quanta
           60-
           50-
           40-
           30-
           20-
            10-
10-
8-
6-
4-
2-
                                 QUANTA
                           '     v      'ENERGY
                  400
              500        600
             WAVELENGTH  (nm)
700
Figure 2.   The relative spectral distribution of  light quanta and energy  in
air off Sweden.  (After Hal Ida1, 197A).

-------
                              ENERGY / QUANTA
    0.95
1.00
1.15
                                                                   - 10
                                                                         Q.
                                                                         UJ
                                                                         O
                   COASTAL
                        •OCEANIC
Figure 3.   The  ratio of energy irradiance to quanta irradiance as a function
of depth for different characteristic water masses (After Jerlov, 1976).

-------




















B
0
CO
I*
4)
^
e
o
u

•o
C
w

0
u
h-4 •«<
M B
J3
41
JO «T

O
• in
^D l**? ^^
—4
N *r«
^ 1
B O
•H | -H
« "• *
BUM
•rt I U
U 00 41
^H f-H ^^













B
•H
10 41

B co


4) -^
-i c«
3 00 U
0 U 1
~> 4) 00






X
4J
.^4
B
1

ey





i
CO
SV
< B
3 •
3

GO
-H 1

<^~H
|
1 CO
to i
u B
| •
00-)












^
1
•
CO

C
CO









^\
3


U
4J
5

MJ M
X O 41
3 9
i-l 41 O
(^ U OH
to
w h M
B O
to 01
.* i 3
•V •*> Q
54J — <
^^j xw

Cb







-H X
1 1-1
CO
• ••*
^^
1 CM 1
8 1
• B CM
B • 1
•-•3 B
41 ^0
** **• B '
• • 5 •"•
B t»\ ^ H ,£! B
V W Q. 01
O 3.^-" IS




i(_>
X
CM .-)
1 -^
CM B
1 U X
B • 4)
• 1— » 1-1
•w 
-------
                             APPARENT OPTICAL PROPERTIES
                             (submarine light fields)
 INHERENT OPTICAL PROPERTIES
(light scat:ering and
    attenuation)
 SUSPENDED AND DISSOLVED MATERIAL
(particles and their properties
    yellow matter etc.)
                             HYDROGRAPHIC PARAMETERS
                         (temperature, salinity, oxygen,
                             current velocities etc.)
      Figure  4.   The  interrelationships  of the various  groups  of concepts in optical
      oceanography  (After Zaneveld,  1974).

-------
                                                                    u
                                                                    01
                          go
                          
-------
compare* the emitted  flux  (F0)  to  the  transmitted  flux  (Ft)  and  reads  out  the
beam tranamittance  (T) as  a ratio:
The attenuance (C) is the ratio of  the  flux  lost  (Fc)  to  the  flux  emitted
(F0):

                                C__LL

                                     F0

Since the flux transmitted added to  the  flux  lost equals  the  original  flux

                                Ft  * FC  - F0

then

                               A.i.   ,
                                FO     FO

and it follows by substitution that

                                T *  C -  1

     Transmissivity is defined as the beam transmittance  (T)  divided by the
path length (r) in meters.  The rate of  change  in attenuance  per meter of beam
is termed the total attenuation coefficient (a or c) and  is defined as a log
function of the beam transmittance  (T)
                                     ~ln  T

                                       r

where r is the path length of the beam,  "c"  is a convenient  and often used
descriptor of the combined inherent  properties of absorption  and scattering
(the units of c are m"1).

     The spectral distribution of the total attenuation coefficient (c)
generally shows high attenuance at  both  ends  of the PAR (see  Fig.  6a).  Since
it is an aggregated coefficient it  is informative to consider the  component
parameters which cause the o»served  attenuance.  Much  of  the  attenuance in the
long wavelengths is due  to the water itself as shown by James and  Birge (1937)
for pure water, and Clarke and James (1939) for filtered  seawater  (see Fig.
6b).  Note that there is  little appreciable difference in the two  curves,
indicating that the effect of sea salts  on attenuance  is  small (Yentsch,
1960).  Light attenuation in pure water  or pure seawater  is a constant.  Of
course, natural water bodies (particularly estuaries)  are not pure, but
contain constantly varying particulate and dissolved substances.   Burt (1958),
using uncontaminated filtered seawater samples, was able  to determine the
attenuance due to dissolved substances.  By subtracting this  from  the total
attenuation coefficient of non-filtered  seawater he was able  to calculate the
light attenuance due to  particulate  matter.   These results (for the eastern
tropical Pacific) are shown in Fig.  6c.  Notice that the  shorter wavelengths
                                      11

-------
                                             22-

                                           r- 20-

                                           - 18-

                                           S 16-
                                           5 ..
                                              2-
                                                   FILTERED
                                                ^ SEA WATER
                                                 V
                                                       5-PURE WATER
                                       TOO
                                               400
 I
500
600
TOO
                                             z
                                             UJ
                                             UJ
                                             K
                                               400
5OO
        TOO
Figure 6.  Spectral distribution of  the  total  attenuation  coefficient and its
component parameters,   (a) Spectral  distribution of  the  total  attenuation
coefficient at different depths in the Baltic  Sea  (After Lundgren,  1975).  (b)
Comparative attenuation of pure water  (After James and Birge,  1937) and
filtered sea water—(After Clark and James, 1939).   (c)  Light  attenuance
caused by particulate matter  (After  Burt,  1959).   (d) Absorption  curve for
Gelbstoff (After Kalle, 1966).
                                      12

-------
are selectively attenuated by particles.  The  shorter wavelength*  are  also
attenuated by yellow substance or Gelbstoff  (s. j Fig. 6d),  the  collective name
given to a complex mixture of organic compounds by Kalle  (1966).   Gelbstoff  is
formed from carbohydrates resulting  from organic matter decomposition  in a
"Mail lard" reaction.  Sources are both allochthonus  (swamps, marshes,  land
runoff) and autochtonus (planktonic, and berthic organisms).  Flocculation of
fine suspended and colloidal materials in estuaries  probably encourages the
reaction, as does the presence of amino acids  (Kalle, 1966).

     The total attenuance (C), as stated previously, is actually a combination
of absorption (A) and scattering (B).

                                   C - A + B

Likewise, the coefficient of attenuation (c or a) is a combination of  the
coefficients of absorptance (a) and  scatterance (b).
     Scattering is the change  in direction of  light propagation caused  by
diffraction, refraction and reflection due to  particles, water molecules and
dissolved substances.  Scattering  is wavelength dependent but in  an  irregular
and complex manner.  The particle  size distribution and the index of
refraction are important parameters related to scatterance.  The major
scatterers in estuaries are silts  and clays (small particles about 1 ym in
diameter) which, in general scatter the shorter wavelengths (blue end of
visible spectrum) much more than the longer wavelengths (red end).
Scatterance meters (nephelometers) designed to measure ^ at either fixed or
variable angles have been devised.  The most appropriate type is  the
integrating meter which measures scattering at all angles.  Most  scattering in
natural water bodies is at small angles (502 at angles leas than 3.5s), i.e.
in the forward direction.  Measurements of light in coastal regions have
usually shown more foreward scattering than those in the open oceans (Jerlov
and Fukuda, 1960; Pickard and  Giovando, 1960;  Morrison, 1970).  Since the
amount of energy scattered literally out of a  hypothetical water column should
be balanced by an equal amount scattered into  that water column from adjacent
columns, the net effect of scattering is the increase of effective path
length.  This results in a greater opportunity for absorption.  For  estuaries
one would expect blue light to be  scattered more then red light and  thus be
subjected to more attenuation  due  to the added absorption by the additional
particles and water molecules encountered in this longer path.

     Absorption is a thermodynamically irreversible process wherein  photons
are converted to thermal, kinetic  or chemical  energy.  Photosynthesis is an
example.  Table III (Jerlov, 1976) summarizes  absorption and scattering
characteristics in seawater.

     Apparent Optical Properties

     The apparent optical properties of a body of water are those resulting
from the measurement of natural light fields underwater, i.e., the measurement
of in situ radiant flux.  There are two basic  types of measurement made:
                                      13

-------















•
*-\
NO
fc^
O*
•—«

*
>
o
^*
hi
41
•-»

U
41
4J
U-l
•<


a
u
•H
u
a
• H
hi
4)
U
u
Cd
hi
Cd
JS
U
eo
B
hi
4)
u
u
cd
u
CO

•o
B
B
O
•H
4-1
a.
hi
o
0!
.O
Cd
U-l
O

X
hi

g
a
3
CO

•
M
I-l
1-4

V
^4
.a
ca
H
JS
u
eo
B
4)
*4
41
>
Cd
3










M
B
• *4
hi
4)
4J
U
CO
u
en








£
u
60
B
4)
rl
4)
Cd
»












§
•*4
U
a.
w
o
CO
JO
<





















V
u
B
41
•o
B
4)
O
41
•B











hi
41
u
U
Cd
hi
Cd
JS
O








41
U
B
41
•a
B
41
O
4)
TJ












hi
41
U
u
(0
hi
cd
j=
u
























f
r<









*4
*H


tt
n
4J
B
cd
• H
hi
Cd
>
B
•H












eo
B
O
hi
4J
CO



4J
Cd
u
CO
B
O
0

4J
Cd
4J
B
Cd
• »4
hi
CO
>
B
• H

















hi
4)
U
5









B
O
•i-l
4J
a
hi
o
a
.a
id
o
u

•a
41
hi
CO
0.


O






















41
hi
3
ca
CO
41
hi
a.
•w
B
cd

•
a.
B
41
4J







































4)
r*
JO
CO
• f4
U
4)
hi
a.
a.
Cd



r<

4) u
« hi
cd 0
4) J3
hi «
U
B •
•H -n
hi
§•
s
CO *t






41
J= C
ij -*4 4J
41
C Jt — '
••4 • O
•) •'J
JS * i.
J3 . hi
•i-l *) 4J
eo^* -^
•^ A 3
--I >M
eo • 4i
4) •* JB
C > *J


«-s
U
•M
B
Cd
eo
hi
o
B
•p4
^i^

ca
4J
*4
Cd
CO

cd
41
en
41
,-4
JS
cd
• r4
hi
cd















41
-H
J3
CO
•H
hi
cd
>


CO CO
•o -o
hi hi
cd ca
9 3
8 o
4J 4J

V 41
« f< «
Cd Cd
4) 4J 41
hi hi hi
U O O
B JS B
•H a -H













4) 4)
^•4 -H
JO JO
CO Cd
•H -H
hi hi
cd cd
> >



4)
•-4
.O
cd
0) -*4
U hi
B cd
cd >
4J
co 4)
XI -u
3 cd
a — i
3
SO
•rt
— 1 4-1
— 1 hi
4) cd
>* a.








































•<

u
hi
O
JS
•





































ht
41
4J
U
9
14

-------
radiance and irradiance.  Radiance  (L)  is defined  in  terms  of  flux  per unit
solid angle per projected area.   Irradiance  (E), the  more common  measurement,
is cimply the flux per unit area  and  is usually  collected with a  flat  circular
opal glass (or plastic) diffuser.   The  diffuser  is  designed so that light
received from all angles is transmitted to the sensor according to  Lambert's
cosine law, i.e. the irradiance transmitted  is proportional to the  incident
radiant intensity multiplied  by the cosine of the  angle  of  incidence.
Spherical irradiance (E8) is  irradiance collected  with a spherical  diffuser
and represents the total light coming from all directions.   It is probably the
best measure of light available for photosynthesis; however, very little data
in this form presently exists in  the  literature.   Jerlov (1976) reports that
investigations of the ratio of cosine collection in the downward  direction
(Ed) to equal collection for  the  upward hemisphere (Eo)  generally show a range
of .75 to .85.  So, cosine irvadiance measures most of the  irradiauce
collected by spherical sensors.   Cosine irradiance is the most usual apparent
property measured for biological  purposes, and is  used in the  research
reported herein.  Irradiance  and  radiance can be expressed  as  either energy  or
quanta (see Table I) but quanta seem  most apropriate  for ecological studies.
Instruments can be designed to measure board spectral regions,  such as the
PAR, or discrete wavelengths,  i.e.  spectral  irradiance.

     The complete spectrum of downward  irradiance  at  sea level and  at  several
depths of the open ocaan is shown in  Fig. 7.  Notice  that there is  almost no
energy outside of the PAR below 1 m.   Most of the  "missing" energy  has been
converted into heat via absorption.   According to  Clark  and Ewing (1974), only
4-11% of incident irradiance  between  300-700 nm  is reflected from the  surface
or backscattered out of the water column (the combination is called albedo)
(see Fig. 8).  The spectral distribution of  downward  irradiance can be
expressed graphically as a family of  curves  of energy (or quanta) versus
wavelength at specific depths, as in  Figs. 7 and 9 or as percentages of
surface irradiance as in Fig. 10.   Depth profile ranges of  Jerlov's (1976)
water types, from clearest oceanic  to most turbid  coastal are  presented in
Fig. 10 along with our Chesapeake Bay (Estuarine)  profiles..

     The diffuse downwelling  (or  vertical) attenuation coefficient^ (K
-------
             1.5-
E

*


Ul
o
z
<

o

K
QC
         oc
            1.0-
            0.5-
                       400
      1200     1800

WAVELENGTH  (nm)
                                               2000
2400
Figure 7.  The complete spectrum of  downward  irradiance in the sea.  (After

Jerlov, 1976).
                                     16

-------
r
                             AIR
                            LIGHT
                   ALBEDO = 4%

                     0.5  3.5
                                                      INCIDENT
                                                 IRRADIANCE =  100
                                                 1%
Figure 8.   The fate of incident  radiation in the PAR over the sea.
Clark and  Ewing, 1974).

                                    17
                                                                                 (After

-------
                                                           r2l
8-1
          x
          T
          E
          u

          E
          c
          p

          i
          a
          Ul
          u
          o
          ac.  4-1
          UJ
          s
          u.
                                         I
              400         500         600

                        WAVE  LENGTH   (nm)
                                      700
Figure V.   Spectral  distribution of downward irradiance  at different depths
over a Zostera marina bed off the eastern shore of  the Chesapeake Bay.
                                    18

-------
                  PERCENTAGE OF  SURFACE  QUANTA (350-70C-«n)

            I        2
                                                                   100
Figure 10.  Depth profiles of percentage of surface quanta  (350-700 nm) for
different water types  ranging from the clearest oceanic  to  coastal (After
Jerlov, 1976) to estuarine (Lower Chesapeake Bay).
                                    19

-------
•  t
               irradiance between water bodies, seasons and wavelengths.   Since  K
-------
       100-
   UJ
   z
   o
        10-
        I  -
   (A
   o
   ac
   o
       0.1-
     0.01
                                                            Om
                                            -0.9
                                                                     -0.8
                                                                     -o.r   -
                                                            K (10, 15)
                                           -0.6





                                           -0.5





                                           -0.4





                                             0.3
                 o

                 iZ
                 u.

                 o
                 o


                 z
                 o

                 h-

                 3
                                                  UJ
                                                  t-


                                           -0.2   <





                                           -O.I
         4CO
500             600


   WAVELENGTH  (nm)
700
il
Figure 11.  Spectral irradiance and diffuse attenuation coefficients for a

different depths at noon on a reef in Jamaica.  (After Booth and Dunstan,

1979).
                                     21

-------
     1.0-


     0.9-


     0.8-


S   0.7 -!

z
2   0.6-
»-
<
1   0.5-
UJ
h-
<   0.4-

u
            u
            t-
            K
    0.3-

    0.2-

    0.1  -

      0
                          (b)
                       I      F       IT      I      I
                     400   450    500   550   600   650

                                      A (nm)
                                                  TOO
Figure 12.  The attenuation coefficient,  Kj of downward irradiance.   (a -
Sargasso Sea, b - African Coast (After Jerlov, 1976),  c * clearest Chesapeake
Bay).

                                      22

-------
      o
      •o
      .8
      ^
      o
      s
      UJ
          1,400-
          1 ,200 -
      7E   1,000 ~
      o
800-




600-




400-




200-
                                                                    Equotor
                      234I567I897IO   II '  12 '


                                    MONTH
Figure 13.  Seasonal variation of solar radiation outside earth's atmosphere

for the Equator and latitudes 40 degrees and 80 degrees.  (After Gates,  1971).
                                      23

-------
    40

UJ
2   30 H
         S   20H
         .J
         u.
         oc   10
                   (a)
               400
                       I      '       I
                      500         600
                      WAVELENGTH  Inm)
     700
             10'-
         'u
         s
             10'H
             10'•
                                                            10 m
                       i
                      10°
                    ill)
                   20°   30°  40°  50°

                    SOLAR  ELEVATION
1
60°
70°
Figure 14.   Variation of reflectance and submarine irradiance with solar
elevation,   (a) Reflectance (&) of global radiation for different solar
elevations  as  a function of wavelength (After Sauberer and Ruttner,  1941),
(b) Diurnal variation of quanta (PAR) off Sardinia (After Jerlov, 1976).
                                    24

-------
more red light is reflected.  Wave  action reduces  the net reflection at low
angles because the light  is reflected  back into  the  water column.   Tae
refractive index (n) of the sea, defined  by Snell's  Law
                                 sin i
   4
it. -j (where i is the  angle  of  incidence  and  j  is  the  refracted angle).  This
means that light coming  in  parallel  to a horizontal sea  is  refracted into the
water a; an angle of  48.5°  from  zenith.   As  the solar elevation increases more
light is able to penetrate  the water (Fig. 14b).

     Tidal cycles in  estuaries cause not only  changes in water bodies and
their associated seston  and dissolved components  but  also cause resuspension
of benthic sediments  and changes in  the  height of the water column.   These are
of course highly idiosyncratic for each  specific  systems.

     Storm and wind events  cause both increased land  runoff,  with its
associated particulate and  dissolved load, and increased wind-driven currents
and waves.  In shallow areas these increase  resuspension.  Scott (1978)
following changes in  attenuation in  an estuary after  a rainstorm found that it
took 11 days for the  submarine irradiance to return to the  pre-stortn
condition.  In near-shore littoral regions the average submarine light
conditions may be controlled by  the  juxtaposition of  the local coastal
morphology with the prevail i-g wind  patterns.
                                      25

-------
                               LITERATURE CITED

Booth, C. R. and P. Dustan.  1979.  Diver-operable multiwavelength
     radiometer.v In:  Measurements of Optical Radiationa.  Soc. Photo-optical
     Instrumentation Engineers 196:33-39.

Burt, W. V.  1958.  Selective transmission of light in  tropical Pacific
     waters.  Deep-Sea Res. 5:51-61.

Clark, G. L. and G. C. Ewing.  1974.  Remote spectroscopy of the sea  for
     biological production studies.  In: N. G. Jerlov and E. Steemann-Nielsen
     (eds.), Optical Aspects of Oceanography.  Academic Press, N.Y.
     pp. 389-413.

Clark, C. L. and H. R. James.  1939.  Laboratory analysis of the selective
     absorption of light by seawater.  J. Opt. Soc. Am. 29:43-55.

Dubinsky, Z. and T. Berman.  1979.  Seasonal changes in the spectral  compo-
     sition of downwelling irradiance in Lake Kinneret  (Israel).  Limnol. &
     Oceanogr. 24(4):652-663.

Gates, D. M.  1971.  The flow of  energy in the biosphere.  Sci. American
     224(3):88-103.

Halldal, P.  1974.  Light  and photosynthesis of different marine algal
     groups.  In: N. G. Jerlov and E. Steeman-Nielsen (eds.), Optical Aspects
     of  Oceanography, Academic Pess, N.Y.  pp. 343-360.

Idso, S. B. and R. G. Gilbert.  1974.  On the universality of the Poole and
     Atkins Secchi disk-light extinction equation.  J.  Appl. Ecol.  11:399-401.

James, H. R. and E. A. Birge.  1938.  A laboratory study of the absorption of
      light by lake waters.  Trans. Wise. Acad. Sci. 31:154 pp.

Jerlov,  N. G.  1976.  Marine Optics, Elsevier Oceanography Series 14.
     Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., N.Y.  231 pp.

Jerlov,  N. G. and M. Fukuda.  1960.  Radiance distribution in the upper
      layers of the sea.  Tellus  12:348-355.

Kalle, K.   1966.  The proble- of  Gelbstoff in the Sea.  Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.
     Ann. Rev. 4:91-104.

Lundgren, B.  1975.  Measurements in  the Baltic with a  spectral  transmittance
     meter.  Univ. Copenhagen Inst. Phys. Oceanogr. Rep. 30., 28 pp.

Montedoro-Whitney Corp.  1980.  Operation and maintenance manual  for  model
     TMU-1B.  San Luis Obiapo, Calif. 93401.
                                       26

-------
Morel, A. and R. C. Smith.   1974.  Relation between  total quanta  and  total
     energy for aquatic photosynthesis.  Limnol. and Oceanogr.  19(4):591-600.

Morrison, R. E.  1970.  Experimental studies on  the  optical properties  of
     sea water.  J. Geophys. Res.  75:612-628.

Pickard, G. L. and L. F. Giovando.   1960.  Some  observations of turbidity
     in British Columbia Inlets.  Limnol. Oceanogr.  5:162-170.

Sauberer, F. and F. Ruttner.   1941.  Die Strahlungsverhaltnisse der
     Binnengewasser.  Akademic Verlag, Berlin.

Scott, B. D.  1978.  Phytoplankton distribution  and  light attenuation in
     Port Hacking Estuary.   Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 29:31-44.

Williams, J.  1970.  Optical Properties of the Sea.  U. S. Naval
     Institute, Anapolis, MD., 123 pp.

Yentsch, C. S.  1960.  The  influence of phytoplankton  pigments  on the colour
     of seawater.  Oeep-Sea  Res.  7:1-9.
                                      27

-------
f
                                        ADDITIONAL RECOMENDED READINGS

                Gordon,  H.  R.,  Smith, R. C. and J. R. Zaneveld.  1980.  Introduction to
                     Ocean Optics.  In S. 0. Duntley, (ed.), Ocean Optics VI, Proc. Soc.
                     Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.  Vol. 208, pp. 15-55.

                Weinberg, S.  1976.  Submarine daylight and ecology.  Marine Biology
                     37:291-304.
                                                      28

-------
I
 I
                                                  Chapter 2
                              LIGHT AND SUBMERGED MACROPHYTE COMMUNITIES IN THE
                                    CHESAPEAKE BAY:  A SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY
                                                     by
                          Richard L. Wetzel, Robin F. van Tine and Polly A. Penhale
                                    Virginia Institute of Marine Science
                                          School of Marine Science
                                         College of William and Mary
                                         Gloucester Point, VA  23062

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION

     The initial focus of submerged aquatic vascular plant  (SAV) research  for
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) was
evaluation of the structural and functional ecology of these communities.   In
the upper Bay, Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton perfoliatus are  the
dominant species while Zoste.a marina and Ruppia maritima are the dominant
species in the lower Bay.  Studies were centered on various aspects of
productivity (both primary and secondary), trophic structure, and resource
utilization by both ecologically and economically important species.  Much  of
the initial research was descriptively oriented due to a general lack of
information on Chesapeake Bay submerged plant communities.  These
investigations created the data base necessary for the development of
ecologically realistic simulation models of the ecosystem.  Following these
initial studies, the research programs in both Maryland and Virginia evolved
toward more detailed analyses of specific factors that potentially limited  or
controlled plant growth and productivity.  Previous results indicated certain
environmental parameters and biolo..-   
-------
4

  I
               regulation (primarily nitrogen aa NH^*  and NC^"),  light  and  photosynthesis,
               and other biological and physical-chemical factors  influencing  light  energy
               distribution.

                    The results of studies in the  lower Bay communities  suggested  a  net
               positive response to short term nutrient additions  and supported  the
               observation by others that these communities are nutrient  limited (Orth,
               1977).  The most consistent positive response was  associated with Ruppia
               dominated communities and the most  variable associated with  the deeper  Zostea
               community (Wetzel et al. , 1979).  In contrast, Kemp et al. (1981)  observed
               that upper Bay SAV communities did  not  appear nutrient limited  but  were
               perhaps limited by suboptimal light conditions.  These results, together  with
               community nietabolisn studies, suggested that light  and the environmental
               factors controlling benthic light availability were key  factors governing
               plant community growth and productivity.  The working hypothesis  developed
               that light-temperature-turbidity regimes and their  interaction  would  explain
               in large part the observed variability  in distribution and abundance.   Changes
               in these parameters, governed by either natural or  man-induced  events and
               perhaps determined over  long time scales, influence variation in  distribution
               and abundance in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem as a  whole.

                    Throughout the Chesapeake Bay, submerged aquatic plant  communities
               exhibit a distinct zonation pattern from the shallower inshore high-light area
               to the deeper, low-light area of the beds.  These  characteristic  distribution
               patterns also suggested different physiological responses  to and  control  by
               local environmental conditions, principally light.
                        studies were initiated in August,  1979, on  lower Bay Ruppia-Zostera
               communities and continued  fo- an annual cycle  to investigate the  effects  of
               light and temperature on specific rates of  seagrass  photosynthesis.   Plants
               were removed from the sediment, placed  in a set of screened  jars  and  incubated
               in a running seawater system using ambient  sunlight.  The plants  were exposed
               to 100, 50, 30, 15, 5 and  1% of ambient light  to determine the effect of  light
               quantity on phytosynthesis.  Experimental designs comparable to these were
               also conducted for upper Bay species.

                    IT conjunction w' rh these studies, measures of  leaf area index  (LAI) were
               also conducted.  The light  levels at which  SAV can grow and  reproduce,  i.e.,
               succeed, is determined by  the photosynthesis-light relationship.  A greater
               leaf area exposed to light  may result in greater productivity, however, light
               reaching the plants is nor  only determined  by  physical factors controlling
               light penetration through  the water column,  but by plant self-shading.
               Maximum plant biomass can  in part be related to leaf area.   The leaf  area
               index (plant area/sediment  surface area) estimates maximum leaf density and
               thus potential area available to absorb light  (Evans, 1972 cited  in McRoy and
               McMillan, 1979).  Leaf surface area also provides a  substrate for epiphytic
               growth.  Leaf area samples  were collected to characterize the three main
               vegetation zones typical of lower Bay communities.   These data were used  to
               provide a more accurate description of  light penetration through  the  plant
               canopy as well as evaluate  potential morphological adaptation of  the  plants to
               various light environments.  Complimentary  field studies were designed  to
               determine the effects of in situ light  reduction through artificial shading.
                                                     31

-------
Light reductions of 70 to 202 of ambient were used.  The  results  of  these
studies supported the hypothesis that total community metabolism  was  governed
and very sensitive to available  light.  During  the course of  these
investigations, light data collected in the field for various  environmental
(climatic) conditions indicated  that natural  light reductions  of  these
magnitudes were common.  In order to determine  the overall effects of light
reduction, specific factors were investigated more thoroughly  using  both
laboratory and in situ experimental approaches  for light-photosynthesis
relationships as well as studies to determine those environmental variables
which controlled light energy distribution and  availability to  the plant
communities.

     Studies initiated during the later phases  of the CBP-SAV  rese&rch
program, investigated the effects of epiphytic  growth and metabolism  and  the
interactive effects of light and acute exposure  to the herbicide  atrazine.
Studies on epiphyte cclonization were along two  lines:  (1) the epiphytic
community as a primary producer  and food source  and (2) as competitors with
the vascular plant community for available light.  Experiments  completed
suggested that the epiphyte comnunity at times  dominates metabolism  of the
community and limits the light available for vascular plant photosynthesis'.
What remained was the determination of which environmental conditions favor
colonization and at what point is the vascular  plant stressed.

     These various research Activities provided  a data and information base to
serve management needs and to identify specific  research areas  where
additional information was required for integration and synthesis.   The work
proposed in the latter part of the CBP/SAV program centered on  filling what
were considered major gaps in information and the data base.   The synthesis
report that follows was based on our current state of understanding of light
energy and distribution in Chesapeake Ray and the relation of  this information
to past and recent knowledge about SAV community growth and survival.  Much of
it was based on preliminary and  incomplete data  reports of ongoing research in
attempt to be as current as possible.
     Vol.  I for  a discussion  r>f  this matter.

-------
              THE RESEARCH PROGRAM ON LIGHT AND  SAV: AN  OVERVIEW

     It ha* been Che working hypothesis of the Chesapeake  Bay  Program SAV
group that changes in such water quality variables  as  suspended particulates
(both living and non-living), dissolved substances  and nutrients  alter
directly or indirectly underwater light regimes  in  such  a  way  as  to  limit
benthic oacrophytic primary production.  Plants  absorb light energy  for
photosynthesis at particular wavelengths determined by their specific pigment
complexes.  As light penetrates the water column, its energy content  and
spectral quality are changed by absorption and scattering.  Water itaelf,
dissolved substances and particulate materials are  responsible for both the
absorption (conversion into heat energy) and  scattering  of light.  Selective
absorption and scattering by these factors results  in the  attenuation of  the
energy of specific light wavelengths causing  a "color  shift" (Kalle,  1966;
Jerlov, 1976, Champ et al., 1980).  Scattering,  the change  in  direction of
light propogation, returns some of the  incident  radiation  toward  the  surface
and thus further reduces the tctal light energy  available  to support
photosynthesis.  Phytuplankton act as both scattering  and  selectively
absorptive and reflective particles and are in direct competition  with benthic
primary producers for the same wavelengths of  light, i.e.  red  and  blue.

     The temporal and spatial distribution of particulate  materials and
dissolved substances are largely determined by climatic  variables.  Wind
velocity and direction, tidal amplitude and frequency, current velocity,  rain
and land runoff all interact to induce  variations in water quality parameters
and subsequently the spectral composition of  light  in  the  water column
(Dubinsky and Herman, 1979; Kranck, 1980; Anderson, 1980;  Thompson et al.,
1979; Scott, 1978; Riaux and DouviUe,  I960).

     Based on these general premises, the light  research program  encompassed
four basic facets: (1) description of the submarine light  environment,
together with measures of various water quality  parameters, (2) description of
climatic and oceanic forcing functions, (3) detailed studies of
photosynthesis-light relations by individual  species and for entire SAV
communities, and (4) analysis of the relationship/correlations among  the  above
data and other available information.  The measurement and  collection of
light, water qualtiy parameters, climatic and oceanic  forcing  functions were
made simultaneously with the light-photosynthesis investigations.  Studies on
both shores of the upper and lower Chesapeake Bay in vegetated and
non-vegetated regions were undertaken.

     Characterization of the light environment was  accomplished using a
Biospherical Instruments Model MER-1000 Spectroradiometer  (Booth  and  Ounstan,
1979).  Specific attenuation in 12 biologically  important  wavelengths and
integrated photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) values were  calculated
from these data.  The spectral irradiance measurements were made  in quantum
                                      33

-------
units aa suggested for biological studies  by  the Special Committee  on
Oceanographic Research (SCOR) of the International Association  of Physical
Oceanographers (IAPO).

     There is a paucity of data on  spectral irradiance  in marine environments
(Jerlov, 1976)—especially for estuarine waters, the Chesapeake Bay being  no
exception.  Burt (1953, 1955«) using a shipboard spectrophototneter  analyzed
filtered seawater samples from the  Chesapeake Bay and concluded that  the
primary factor in light extinction  was the filterable,  particulate  matter.
Seliger and Loftus (1974) studied the spectral distribution of  light  in
shallow water in a subestuary in the upper Bay in July  and found a  marked
reduction of light in the 400-500 nm region of the spectrum.  Champ et al.
(1980) observed an "orange-shift" in the upper Bay during August 1977 using  a
submersible solar illuminance meter equipped with optical filters.   They
suggest, that there is a continuum  of spectral shifts toward the penetration
of. longer wavelengths from oceanic  to coastal to estuarine waters.  This
corroborates and extends Kalle's "yellow shift" theory  (Kalle,  1966).  Kalle
contends that the shift to longer wavelengths is more pronounced as  the
concentrations of suspended particles increases.  These investigations make  up
in large part the only complementary data base and to our knowledge  no data
exists for the light environment in and around SAV habitats with the exception
of that gathered by the EPA-CBP study.

     Various lines of evidence as discussed earlier, suggested  light as a
major factor controlling the distribution and productivity of seagrasses.
Preliminary studies demonstrated both potential nutrient and light  quantity
effects on plant community metabolism.  More quantitative field and  laboratory
studies were designed and carried out in later phases of the CBP-SAV research
program on photosynthesis-light relations in Chesapeake Bay SAV communities.

     For the field approaches, the  entire SAV community and its interactions
were included by the experimental designs.  Short-term  shading experiments
reflected the community response to daily variations in light quantity due to
such natural phenomena as cloud cover, tidal stage, and storm events.
Long-term shading studies reflected community response  to situations where
light penetration is reduced.  The  purpose was to estimate minimum  light
quantities necessary to keep the SAV community alive.   For the  latter effort
sets of neutral density, mesh canopies were placed in selected SAV  areas for
long term studies.  Shaded and control areas were studied at regular intervals
over the course of these experiments (1-2 months).  Community metabolism and
various plant community parameters  (e.g., leaf area index, chlorophyll _a and
b_, biomass and other plant meristic characters) were measured.  Studies were
carried out in spring, summer, and  early fall 1981 to include the major growth
and die-back periods.

     Past research programs in the  CBP-SAV program resulted in several
hypotheses that might explain both  the short and longer term survival of Bay
grasses.  Among these, the potential for light, including those variables
influencing light-energy distribution, as a major environmental variable
controlling SAV distribution, growth and survival was postulated.   The intent
of the remaining sections of this chapter are to: (1) provide in an overview
fashion, the general characterisitcs of light in natural aquatic systems with
                                      34

-------
emphasis on Chesapeake Bay, (2) summarize Che research results throughout the
Bay relative to light and Bay grasses, and (3) discuss the potential for light
or light related causality of Fay grass declines.
                                      35

-------
                          LIGHT  IN THE CHESAPEAKE  BAY

General Characteristics of Estuarine Optical Properties2

     The study of the interaction of solar  energy  with estuarine waters
necessitates not only an understanding of the propeties of  light and  1^0 but
also must take into account the  myriad living and  non-living  entities, both
dissolved and suspended, which affect the propagation of  light  in aquatic
environments.

     The sun emits electromagnetic radiation in discrete  packets of quanta (Q)
of energy termed photons.  The energy content (e)  of each quantum is  directly
proportional to the frequency (v),

                                   e  - hv
and indirectly proportional to the wavelength (X),
where h is Planck's universal constant and c  is the speed of  light  in  a
vacuum.  This means that the quanta of shorter wavelengths contain  more  energy
than quanta of longer wavelengths.

     The complete spectrum of downward irradiance  for  incoming solar radiation
at the top of the atmosphere, at sea level, and at several water depths  in  the
open ocean is illustrated in Fig. la.  Most of the energy reaching  the earth's
surface is contained within the shorter wavelengths 1.4-10 u  or 400-1000
nanometers^(nmj .  Not surprisingly, this region includes the  wavelengths of
greatest biological importance, i.e. 400-700  run, the photosynthetically  active
region of the spectrum termed PAR or PHAR.  There  is almost no energy  outside
the PAR at a depth of 1 m.  Most of the "missing"  energy has  been converted to
heat via absorption.  Only 4-11% of incident  irradiance between 300-700  run  is
reflected from the surface or backscattered out of the open ocean water  column
(Clark and Ewing, 1974).  Slightly more may be backscattered  from estuarine
waters.

     The properties and concepts of optical oceanography are  usually divided
into two mutually exclusive classes:  (1) inherent and (2) apparent.   Inherent
2See Chapter 1 for a more detailed treatment.

3lnm - 10~3 m - 10"9 m
                                      36

-------
0.2-
                            NON-CHLOROPHYLLOUS
                                 PARTICLES
           v    CHLOROPHYLLOUS
           \ \    /PIGMENTS
          GELBSTOFF-^

          PURE
                            ATTENUATION
                              COEFFICIENT
                                                                             «a
                                                                             4)
                                                                                hi -H
                                                                        f. u
                                                                        •u «
                                                                        B
                                                                        4) 4J
                                                    3000
                                                         o  o
                                                            tt)
                                                         c  a
                                                         eg  00
                                                         
                                 a •'. i->
                                 v    e

                                   §3
                                Oi -H O*

                                 a  « B
                                 O  3 •)
                                 hi  B 4)
                                uj  01 JE
                                                    O •«*   —t c 4J ,
                                                    4J i-« « u > <0
                                                    01 u-i
                                                    V- O
                                                    (U
                                                    JS. C
                                                    a o
                                                    « •-*
                                                    o u
                                                    B 3
                                                                                4)
                                                                             B 06
                           ^z "-"
                           u
                           D.
                           01  •
                           •O *-x
                                                    O eo



                                                    §•'•



                                                    • ?'
                                                    O 4) '
                                                    hi B
        •OB  * >*-
        41  OJ *~* O>
        a£    co -H
        **>  4) ao
           u &>  *
        o  B *•*  (0
        hi   4J
                                4) CU'^*' B
                                3 X   <8
                                                            II

                                                            M
                                                    -3  ^«
       ^ °
       < ,,

       in
       kU
                                                    -2  P
                                                         to
                                                         =>
                                                         u.
                                                         u.
  n
s^ o  O B •
   <9 -M O
   U-l  U O
                         a> 3
                         0> 01
        10 **•
        3 -H
        O 00
 X 01  ., •-! <3N

 a. *->  o   •
 hi u u^   .c
 u <9    u-i u
      §B o 
 a a> v-' hi x
 30    O Si
 u B  X a) u
 a *J  a) .fl n)
 4) 
-------
properties, such as absorption  and  scatcerinj  are  independent  of  changes in
insolation (incoming  light), whereas  apoarent  properties,  such  as  underwater
irradiance, vary with changing  solar  anc  atmospheric  conditions.

     As light passes  through the water  column  its  energy content  and  spectral
quality are changed by absorption and scattering due  to the water  itself,
dissolved substances, and suspended particles.  The combined effect of  these
processes is termed attenuation.  The spectral  distribution of  the total
attenuation coefficient ( a or  c), measured with the  beam  transmissometer,
generally shows high  attenuance at both ends of the PAR.   Since "c" is  an
aggregated coefficient, it i.. informative  to consider the  component parameters
which cause the observed attenuance.

     Scattering is the change in direction of  light propagation caused  by
diffr-»'tion, refraction, and reflection due to  particles,  water molecules,  and
dissolved substances.  Backscattering results  in the  loss  of energy from the
water.  Lateral scattering and  forward  scattering  increase the  path length  of
the light thus exposing it to further absorption.  The fine particles - clays
and silts - characteristic of estuaries may differentially scatter shorter
wavelengths (blue) causing increased  attenuation.  Scattering  is wavelength
dependent, but in an  irregular  and complex manner.  Absorption  is  a
thermodynarnically irreversible  process wherein  photons are converted  to
thermal, kinetic, or  chemical energy; photosynthesis  is an example.   Much of
the attenuance of the energy of the long wavelengths  is due to  the water
itself, as shown by James and Birge (1938) for  pure water  and by Clarke and
James (1939) for filtered seawater (see Fig. 1).   The effect of sea salts on
attenuance is relatively insignificant  in  the  PAR.  Of course,  natural  water
bodies (particularly  estuaries) are not pure,  but  contain  constantly varying
particulate and dissolved substances.  Burt (1958), using  uncontaminated
filtered seawdter samples, was  ab'e to determine the  attenuance due to
dissolved substances.  By subtracting this from the total  attenuation
coefficient of non-filtered seawater  he was able to calculate  the  light
attenuance due to particulate matter.  The energy  of  blue and red  wavelengths
are selectively absorbed by particles, as  shown in the example  given by Prieur
and Sathyendranath (1981) (Fig. Ib).  The  shorter  wavelengths are  also
attenuated by yellow  substance  or Celbstoff (see Fig.  Ib), the  collective name
given to a complex mixture of organic compounds by Kalle (1966).   Gelbstoff is
formed from carbohydrates resulting from  organic matter decomposition.
Sources are both allocthonous (swamps, marshes, land  runoff) and autocthonous
(planktonic and benthic organisms).   Flocculation  of  fine  suspended and
colloidal materials in estuaries probably  promotes the reaction, as does the
presence of amino acids (Kalle, 1966).

     The apparent optical vroperties  of a  body  of  water result  from the
measurement of natural light fields underwater, i.e.  the measurement  of in
situ radiant flux.  Irradiance  (E), the flux of light  reaching  a defined area,
is usually collected with a flat circular  opal  glass  (or plastic)  diffuser  (2 11
collector).  The diffuser is designed so  that  light received from  all angles
is transmitted to the sensor according  to  Lambert's cosine law, i.e., the
irradiance transmitted is proportional  to  the  incident radiant  intensity
multiplied by the cosine of the angle of  incidence.   Jerlov (1976) reports
that the ratio of cosine collection of downwelling irradiance  (E
-------
hemispherical collection  (Eo) is generally  in  Che  range  of  .75  to .85
downwelling.  2 H irradiance  is the apparent property  of water  bodies most
commonly measured for biological purposes,  and was  the measure  used  in CBP-SAV
research.  Of course, irradiance can be  expressed  as either  energy or quanta
and measured in broad spectral regions,  such as  the PAR,  or  at  discrete
wavelengths, i.e., spectral -rradiance.  A  family  of downwelling  spectral
irradiance curves by depth, in quanta,  is shown  in  Figure 2  for a Zostera
marina bed on the Eastern Shore of the  Chesapeake  Bay.

     Primary producers or autotrophs contain light-capturing pigments to carry
out photosynthesis.  Most phytoplankton  possess  a  pigment complex similar to
that of seagrasses and other  higher plants.  These  pigment systems absorb
strongly in the blue and  red  regions.   Figure  Ib illustrates how  combinations
of water column constituents  may cause  specific  spectral attenuation patterns.
As these constituents change  both temporally and spatially,  the resultant
spectral absorption pattern changes.  Prieur and Sathyendranath (1981)  have
attempted to classify water bodies based on combinations of  these factors.

     The diffuse downwelling  (or vertical)  attenuation coefficient^  (Kj)
expresses the decay of irradiance as an  exponential function,
                                       Eo
                                       TI
where £2 is the irradiance at depth Z^, EI  is  the  irradiance  at depch  Zj,  and
(Z2~Zj) is the distance between  the two measured depths  in meters.   The  units
of K
-------
                                                            r2l
                                                             -20
               400          500         600

                         WAVE LENGTH  (nm)
                                                                  O
                                                                  x
                                                                  u

                                                                  'E
                                                                  c
                                                                  O
                                                                  I
                                                                  O
700
Figure 2.  Downwe 11ing spectral  quanta  irradiance at the surface and at
several depths above the canopy  of  a  Zostera marina bed on the Eastern Shore
of the lower Chesapeake Bay  (Vaucluse Shores) at 1230 E.S.T.  on a cloudy April
day.  The scale for the insolation  is on the right.
                                     40

-------
_a_ and _c and  inorganic  particles  explain must of the observed variation in                '
spectral attenuation in  the  nhode River Estuary (upper Chesapeake Bay).

     The diffuse  attenuation coefficient (Kd) and the total attenuation
coefficient  (c  or  ) derived from the  beam transmissometer measure two
different  properties with no simple relatedness.   Calculation of c is based on
a spectrally defined and emission-controlled collimated light source which is
designed to  eliminate  diffuse (scattered) light.   Kj, however, is based on the
natural diffuse submarine light  field.   Secchi disk readings (D8) are actually
attempts to  measure K
-------
f
  t
                incidence  of  light  striking  the  surface.   Since the interface between water
                and air  is a  boundary  between  media  of different optical densities, an
                electromagnetic wave  striking  it splits into a reflected and a refracted wave.
                Reflection of combined sun and skylight from a horizontal,  flat surface varies
                asymptotically with solar elevation,  i.e.,  between 3-62 at  angles greater than
                30° from the  horizon.   Below 30°,  the reflectance increases dramatically up to
                402 at 5°.  Reflection below 30* is  wavelength dependent.   The longer waves
                are reflected more  due to the  changing quantity of diffuse  atmospheric light
                at  low sun angles  (Sauberer  and  Ruttner,  1941).  Wave action, on the other
                hand, reduces reflection  at  low  angles.

                    Tidal cycles  in  estuaries not only change water bodies and their
                associated seston  and  dissolved  components,  but also cause  resuspension of
                sediments  and cause changes  in depth.  These are, of course,  highly
                idosyncratic  for specific systems. (Burt,  1955b; Scott, 1978).

                Light Attenuation  in  the  Chesapeake  Bay

                    A comparison  of  diffuse downwe 11ing  spectral attenuation coefficients
                reported for  the Chesapeake  Bay  and  its tributaries is presented in Figure 3
                along with Jerlov's (1976) standard  curve (Type 9) for most turbid  coastal
                water.   For the Chesapeake Bay,  the  earliest measurements of K
-------

                                                                                          C9
                                                                                          z
                                                                                          til

                                                                                                  a
                                                                                                  41
                                                                                                  O ".
                                                                                                 •H  eg
                                                                                                  01
                                                                                                  O  •
                                                                                                  U  e
                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                  c •*
                                                                                                  O U
                                                                                                 •^  (0
                                                                                                  U  O
                                                                                                  a -^
                                                                                                  9 «w
                                                                                                  e -H
                                                                                                  t)  ia
                                                                                                  4J  at
                                                                                                  u  eg
                                                                                                  (0 -H
                                                                                                      U
                                                                                                 ^^
                                                                                                  18 -4
                                                                                                  h eg
                                                                                                  4J U
                                                                                                  u en
                                                                                                  v eg
                                                                                                  a. o
                                                                                                  to u
^  41
A  U
v^  C
    •
          £>
        CO
        (!) TJ
       —i  c

       X>  3
        C8  O
       E  C
       O  O
                                                                                                     .0
                                                                                                     M
                                                                                                     3
                                                                                                         ki 00
                                                                                                         3 O>
    CU
• 3d*i
   9161 '
                                                         *»• 3»»3<(»S3H3
                                                                                                        §•0   •
                                                                                                        r^. ^H
                                                                                                        »  ca
                                                                                                  V  to —>
                                                                                                  CO -       U
                                                                                                  3  >
                                                                                                 w-i  O  >
                                                                                                 "4-1  -*  O  CU
                                                                                                 •rf  u -^  o
                                                                                                 "O  ai  u  u
                                                                                                     "»  (U  41
                                                                                                 <*J     "1 •-!
                                                                                                  O  A     OL,
                                                                                                     u  C
                                                                                                  e  •->•-!  e
                                                                                                  o  >    --.
                                                                                                  a      co
                                                                                                 •H  X  CU  41
           0)
       •o  s
       cu  e
       u  Cv
       u  u
       O  4J   •
       — I  (0  CO
       a,     u
          vw  CD
       ->  O  *J
       o     eg
       >-»  eg  3
           01
         eg  ea
        -  at  41
        co  u  3
        SCO
       4^  CU *^
       "-4  <0
        O  41  »
       J  U  O
           a— i
       •O  41 — •
        C  V4  tg
        <8    J=
           eg  eo
        1-  41
              C
                                                                                                  eg  co ^ ^3   .   .
                                                                                                  o.     eg  eg  00  eg
                                                                                                  S  CU *J 4J
                                                                                                  o  j:
                                                                                                 U  eg  a  B
                                                                                                     41  O  O
                                                                                                     a.  u  u
                                                                                                 co  co
                                                                                                     eu "O -o
                                                                                                  cu  x  eg  cu
                                                                                                  k>  u  u  u
                                                                                                  3      w  u
                                                                                                  00 U  O  O
                                                                                                 .HO—'—'
                                                                                                 [K  U-( Oi Ou
       -4 T5 ^
       CU  CU (->
       w -o oo
           eg 3\
       e .c -•
       •H C/l •— '

       cn    —4
       4>   •  CU
       > O  N
       ki ao u
       3 ON  41
       O -. 3
             d-uO.LN3IOI.dJ3a> NOIlvnN3J.iV  SSOJdlQ

-------
p
  »
                was much  higher  at  Che  mouths  of  the  Patuxent  and Potomac Rivers (upper Bay)
                than  at the mouths  of the  York, Severn and Ware Rivers (lower Bay).  Fig. 4
                locates the  lower Bay sampling stations.

                      This brief  summary of the recent  available Chesapeake Bay data on diffuse
                downwelling  2  irradiance  attenuation indicates a severe attenuation of light
                energy in the  photosynthetically  important 400-500 run (violet-blue) and
                650-775 nm,  (red and near  infrared) regions of the spectrum.   Attenuation in
                the short wavelengths was  particularly marked  in the  turbidity maximum region
                of  the Bay at  the mouth of the Sassafras  River,  and at the mouth of the
                Patuxent  River during August  (Champ et al., 1980) and at the  lower Bay sites
                during spring  runoffs (Fig. 5, and  see Chpt. 3).  The mean attenuation
                coefficients calculated for the Bay by Champ et  al.  (1980) are about 1.0 nT*
                higher than  Jerlov's (1976) most  turbid coastal water classification but are
                close to  those calculated  by  ourselves (see Fig. 7,  Chpt. 3;  van Tine and
                Wetz?.l, 1983).

                Compaiison of  Light Attenuation in Vegetated and unvegetated  Sites of the Bay:

                Preliminary  Analysis^

                      An analysis of the spectral  attenuation coefficients at  shallow sites in
                the  lower Chesapeake was undertaken to determine if correlations existed
                between the  presence or absence of benthic macrophytes (Zostera marina and
                Ruppia maritima) and specific  spectral patterns.  The specific question
                addressed was  — What are  the  light quality differences between vegetated and
                unvegetated  sites?   The sites  (Fig. 4) were chosen because of their varied
                vegetational histories  (Orth  et al.,  1979). The Mumfort Island (York River)
                and Severn River sites  are presently  unvegetated.  The Guinea Marsh and Four
                Point Marsh  (Ware River) sites have seagrass beds.  Both the  Severn River and
                Four  Point Marsh sites  are impacted by agricultural runoff (C. Hershner, pers.
                comm.).   Twelve  wavelengths,  (410, 441, 488, 507, 520, 540,  570, 589, 625,
                656,  671, 694  nm +_  5 nm),  and  total PAR were analyzed at depths of 0.1 and 0.5
                m.  Downwelling  irradiance (E
-------
Figure 4.  Locations of lower Bay stations (1) Mumfort Is., York R.,  (2)
Allen's Is., York R., (3) Guinea Marshes, U) Mouth of Severn R.,  Mobjack Bay,
(5) Four Point Marsh, Ware R., Mobjack Bay, (6) Vaucluse Shores off Hungars
Creek, (7) deep station.

-------
region of the spectrum at the vegetated  sites  (Fig.  5), despite  the  effects of
high blue attenuation due to runoff.  A  significant  difference among sites
based en PAR attenuation coefficients was also observed in  July;  however,  one
vegetated site (Four Point Marsh) had attenuation coefficients as high  as  the
unvegetated sites (Fig. 6).  This was due to the increased  attenuation  of
wavelengths above 500 ran at the Four Point Marsh site during  July.   The only
general light quality differences between vegetated  and unvegetated  sites  that
was evident from these preliminary analyses was the  reduced attenuation in  the
500-700 ran region at vegetated sites during May.*"

     Kaumeyer et al. (1981) measured a significant difference in  PAR
attenuation coefficient inside and outside SAV beds  at Todd's Cove,  Md.  during
July, August, and September, 19eO.  Kd (PAR) for the vegetated areas was  from
0.4 m~  to approximately 2 m~l lower.  Significant differences were  r.ot  found
in attenuation inside and outside grassbeds at their Parson's Island s.udy
site.  Table 1 summarizes the results of their studies.

     Histcrical Data Bases and Optical Properties of the Chesapeake  Bay

     Most of the historical light data for the Chesapeake Bay has  been
col'ected by Secchi disc. This method is not ideal but can be us-.'J to indicate
trends.  Heinle et al. (1980) reviewed Secchi  disc light data for both  mid-Bay
and the Patuxent River, which was chosen because of  the extensive  data  base
(Fig. 7).  Transparency has decreased since the 1930's, especially during  the
winter in the mid-Bay (Fig. 7a).  An increase  in turbidity, as estimated  by
Secchi disc measures, has been quite dramatic  in the Patuxent (Figs. 7b,  7c).
Mid-1970's Secchi disc data for rivers in the  upper  Chesapeake Bay are
reported in Table II from Stevenson and  Confer (1978).  The values are
generally low «1.0 m) and are similar to those reported for  the  Patuxent
during the 19t>0's and 1970's (Figs. 7b,  7c).

     Increases in chlorophyllous pigments due  to phytoplankton blooms (which
can be caused by increased nutrients) may have a severe effect on light
attenuation in the photosyntheticaily critical blue  and red spectral  regions
(Fig. Ib, Id).  Historical chlorophyll data for the  Chesapeake Bay and
Patuxent River are summarized in Figures 8 and 9.  Chlorophyll concentrations
have incre ^ed dramatically in the upper and mid-Bay since  the early 1950's.
Concentrations as high as 100 to 200 vg'l"  are not  unusual.  In  contrast,
lower Bay — main stem — concentrations have  not significantly changed  (Fig.
8b).  Concentrations in the Patuxent River have inceased significantly  in both
the upper and lower portions (Fig. 9), especially during late spring and early
summer (Fig. 9b).  Levels in excess of 100 ug*l   were common in  the summer
throughout the 1970's, these are TWICE the concentrations measured during  the
previous decade.
^Subsequent measurements  and  analysis extend  and corroborate  this  conclusion:
not only is the mean violet and blue attenuation lower at vegetated  sites  but
the variation  is also  less,   (see Chapter  3,  this volume).

-------
               UNVEGETATED  SITES
                                               VEGETATtD SITES
    'E
     e
    re
    z
    o
                               MUMFORT IS
                                                          GUINEA MARSH
                                                    RUNOFF
         3-
         ZH
       •\v
           \ JULY
          \ \
           -A
                  \
            \
             \
                  \
3   '
Z
Ul

4
O
5.   3H
    O
    Q
    cn
            \   "«
             \      '
                                SEVERN R
              JULT\
    2-
                                             \JULV
                                         \0 \

                                        RUMOFF\
                                  FOUR POINT MARSH


                                 	 MARCH
                                 	 APRIL
                                 	MAY

                                 	JULY
                                              \ \

                                               \  ^^
                                                •

                                                        \ MAY
                                                         \
         400
                     1
                    500
      600      700 400

WAVELENGTH IN NANOMETERS
                                                 i
                                                500
                                                          600
                                                                         700
Figure 5.  Mean monthly diffuse downwelling  spectral attenuation coefficients
for vegetated and unvegetated sites  in  the lower Chesapeake (March-July,
1981).  All coefficients calculated  for the  depth  interval 0.1 to 0.5 m.
Mumfort Island (York River) and Severn  River sites:  unvegetated.  Guinea
Marsh and Four Point Marsh (Ware River) sites:  vegetated.

-------
                   2.0
             o

             in



            7e
z
UJ

u
u.
u.
UJ
o
o
             =>
             z
             UJ


             4

             cr
                   i.o-
                  0.5-
                         	 MUMFQRT IS

                         •— ALLENS IS

                         	 GUINEA  MARSH



                         — FOUR  PT. MARSH
                              FOU» PT MARSH

                              (VEGETATED)
                        MARCH
                      APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
Figure 6.  Mean  monthly downwelling PAR attenuation  coefficient + 1 standard

error of the mean  for vegetated and unvegetated  sites  in  the  lower Chesapeake

Bay.

-------
TABLE I.  COMPARISON OF MEAN PAR ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS INSIDE AND
          OUTSIDE OF VEGETATED AREAS AT TODD'S COVE, MD. 1980
          (KAUMEYER et al., 1981)
Month              Location
June
July
August
September
SAV
Reference
SAV
Reference
SAV
Reference
SAV
Reference
2.6 + 0.20
2.5 +_ 0.75
2.5 + 0.30
2.9 jf 0.70
1.8 + 0.56
3.1 +_ 0.33
1.9 + 0.34
3.8 + 0.96
                                   49

-------
                      4-
                      3-
                      2-
                 •S  2.0-
                     10-
                 o.
                 UJ
                 Q

                 ;   0.5 H
                 u
                 o
                 UJ
                 I/)
                                                       O1974-77
                                                       • 1936-40
                                                       A '960, l»«l, I9«4
                                                       A MEDIAN 8/ZZpt*
                                                      O-£ RANGE  WZSpt*
                            I    I
I   I
                                                     I
                  I
                                                             I
 I
                              SECCHI DISC
                               14 I S E
                                  (d f)
                                                  ,936-1939
                                                 HEINLE/NASH
                 1968- 1970
               FLEMERe* 01(1970)
                          j   F  M   A  M   JJA'SON   D
                     2.5-



                     2.0-


                     I 5-



                     1.0-



                     05-



                      0
                                            1
                                            6
          8    10

SURFACE  SALINITY (%o)
                    i
                   12
I
14
Figure  7.   Historical  Chesapeake Bay Secchi disc   values (after  Heinle et al.,
1980 and  references  therein),   (a)  monthly mid-Bay means,  (b) monthly means
Patuxent  River estuary,   (c) Patuxent River Secchi dapth vs. salinity, July
(after  Mihursky and  Boynton, 1978).
                                         50

-------
TABLE II.  AVERAGE SECCHI DISC DATA (cm) BY RIVER SYSTEM, MARYLAND
           CHESAPEAKE BAY, 1972-1976a,  (as reported in Stevenson &
           Confer, 1978).

River System
Elk & Bohemia
Sassafras
Howe 11 & Swan Points
Eastern Bay
Chop tank
Little Chop tank
James Island & Honga
Honga River
Bloods worth Island
Susquehanna Flats
Fishing Bay
Nanticoke & Wicomico
Manokin
Patapsco
Big & Little Annemessex
Gunpowder & Bush Headwaters
Pocomoke Sound, MD
Magothy
Severn
Patuxent
Back, Middle & Gunpowder
Curtis & Cove Point
South, West & Rhode
Chester
Love & Kent Points
Smith Island, MD
AVERAGE
1972
33.0
34.3
33.8
67.3
60.7
64.5
70.1
78.2
73.7
64.5
49.5
55.4
94.2
73.7
109.7
42.9
101.6
83.8
97.3
80.3
79.5
45.2
74.7
76.2
89.7
78.5
70.1
1973
35.1
52.3
75.4
62.5
62.5
59.4
64.0
67.3
87.6
65.5
77.0
58.9
94.7
80.0
92.7
38.3
82.0
97.3
70.4
80.8
75.7
77.0
66.0
73.4
74.7
76.2
71.1
1974
_
-
-
76.5
84.3
66.8
74.2
72.6
94.7
82.6
85.6
65.8
101.3
67.8
96.3
46.7
-
73.4
79.5
61.5
73.2
81.8
61.2
100.1
117.6
89.7
79.5
1975
25.7
29.2
61.2
54.6
61.5
63.8
67.1
68.8
177.0
33.8
75.7
61.0
107.4
-
88.1
-
96.8
-
-
66.8
75.4
58.9
48.5
87.9
72.1
139.4
76.2
1976
36.3
51.
57.7
75.9
64.3
78.5
73.4
67.8
83.3
76.5
54.1
58.9
81.0
70.1
85.1
53.8
85.9
74.4
86.4
62.7
61.2
73.7
67.1
85.1
89.9
87.6
71.4
                                   51

-------
    01
    f
    o
ovj —
70-


60-
50-
40-


30-




20-
10-

o-

i
0 CBI 1949-1951
a CBI 1964-1966
O CBI 1969 -1971
• EPA 1969 -1971






1
1


J.ltf,
Il2« •
(1970)










£
1


I"

ft) *H a OB^^S
i i 1 i



i




a

i



1
a





1
^
240



1













i


(1*631
1




A





1
t

O
1 i





a
<
c







1
i
i








a

I '
A> 4
i A
1


a

i




1123








1


t

.6
A
i
\j

i i
,







<



i


(
\
"»«' UPPER Q
BAY


.

t
^


1 1
y
c

i
1
i
2
A







i
2






.
1 1
1 1
,





&


M A A
A In-i
U ~ rf 1Kt
B "3
1 1 1
        30-
        20-
         10-
         0-
O FLEISCHER etal, (1976) 1973 DATA
O CBI 1949-1931 -Potomac to Rappahonnock (744)
• CBI 1949-1951 Lower Bay Below Rappahannock (724,707)
• PATTEN etal, (1963)
a CBI 1964-1967 (746)
D CBI 1969-1971 (744,7443)
• CBI 1969-1971(724,707) R

              
-------
                                                                                               I
                 100
              -   80

              o>
              a


              01   60
              o   40
                  20
                 100





                  80





                  60





              a   40
              o
              5


              *   20
a


01
              0>
              a.
              c.
              a.
              o

              3
                 100
                  80
                  60
                  20
                       Q

                       Jon,F«b, Mar
                               • Lower Marlboro

                               O Btnedict Bridge

                               Q Queen Tree Landing
                       b
                       May, June, July
                       c
                       Aug ,Sept, Oct
                     1962    64    66
                        68    TO


                          YEAR
                                                 72
                                                      74    76
                                                                 78
Figure  9.   Summary  of historical  chlorophyll ^ data for  three regions of  the

surface waters of the Patuxent  R.,  Md.  (a) January-March  (b) May-July  (c)

August-October (after Heinle et al., 1980).
                                         53

-------
     In addition to the thoroughly documented  increased  chlorophyll-^
concentration in the Patuxent, there have also been  increases  in moat  of  the
other tributaries of the Bay.  Chlorophyll-^ concentrations  in the  Choptank,
Chester, and Miles Rivers of the Middle Eastern Shore  are  1.5  to 2  times
higher presently than earliest data  showed.  There have  also been upstream
increases in the Magothy, Severn (Md.) and South Rivers.   In the upper Potomac
concentrations up to 100 Ug'1"1 were measured  in the mid-19601s.
Concentrations in the lower Potomac were generally higher  in the 1960's  than
1950, except during March and April  (Heinle  et al.,  1980)  (see Table  III).
Increased chlorophyll a_ concentrations have  also been  measured  in the
Rappahannock and York rivers during  the last few years.  The  upper James  has
had high concentrations similar to the upper Potomac since the  mid-1960's  but
the lower River still does not.  Dense algal blooms have been  noted in the
Elizabeth, Back, and Poquoson Rivers of the  lower Bay.

     Heinle et al. (1980) summarized the state of the  Bay  graphically  in  terms
of enrichment—which they defined as "deviations in concentrations of
chlorophyll _a from historic, natural periods of stability  or steady state
concentrations."  Figure 10 depicts the regions of the Bay which they
categorized as moderately or heavily enriched.  Significantly,  most of these
same areas have experienced declines in Bay  grasses on a time  scale
overlapping the enrichment (Orth and Moore,  1982).

     Suspended particulates and dissolved materials also impede the amount and
quality of light reaching the benthos.  Amounts of dissolved organic
materials, inorganic particuiace matter and  allochthonous  organic particulate
matter in the Bay are mainly determined by input (runoff)  of freshwater  to the
tributaries.  Dramatic increases can result  from storm events.  Table  IV
summarizes annual mean freshwater flow to the entire Bay and major  storms
during the period, 1951-1979.  In addition to adding large amounts of  sediment
to the water column, major storm events increase nutrient  loads originating
from agricultural fertilizers and other sources thus stimulating phytoplankton
blooms.  There is also an apparent wet-year, dry-year  cycle  imposed on the
data.  The five year flow averages suggest a mid-1960's depression  followed  by
an increase through the 1970's.  Although these data have  not  been  rigorously
analyzed, it is apparent that long term changes and or cycles  in climatic
conditions (rainfall, temperature and major  storms) influence  water quality
and therefore the optical properties of Bay  waters.

     Suspended sediment transport and discharge of the Susquehanna River,  the
major source of freshwater to the Bay, is given in Table V.  Gr ss et  al.
(1978) suggest that one-half to two-thirds of  the suspended  sediment  discharge
of the Susquehanna is deposited behind the dams or in  lower  reaches of the
river during years of low flow and no major  flooding.  However, during major
floods these deposits are eroded and transported into  the  Bay.  Thus,  the  dams
effectively increase the amount and  variability of sediment  discharged under
flood conditions possibly contributing to periodic stressing of the Bay.
                                      54

-------
TABLE III.  RANGES OF CONCENTRATIONS OF  CHLORPHYLl.  a_ (yg I"1)  AT
            SURFACE AND BOTTOM DEPTHS  IN THE  LOWER  POTOMAC  RIVER
            DURING 1949-1*51, AND  1965-1966  (after,  Heinle  et  al.,
            1980).

Month
January
March-April
May
July
October-November
1949-1951
Surface Bottom
1-2
10-21
3-6
3-5
1-9+
1-2
12-27+
9-24+
1-2+
1-7
1965-1966
Surface Bottom
3.2-4.7
1.1-20.0
5.8-13.2
9.0-13.8
9.3-24.0
3.1-5.0
1.1-9.5
4.3-9.8
1.0-1.8
3.6-11.0
                                   55

-------
                       Moderately Enriched

                       Heavily Enriched
Figure 10.   Enriched sections of the Chesapeake Bay.  Enrichment  is  defined as
an increase  in  chlorophyll a_ levels from  historic, natural periods of
stability  (after  Heinle et al., 198C).

-------
                                                                                    H
TABLE IV.  TOTAL ANNUAL MEAN FRESHWATER FLOWS TO THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
           AND OCCURRENCE OF HURRICANES, 1951-1979 (after Heinle et
           al.. 1980).

Year
1951
1952
1953
1954 Hurricane
1955 (2) Hurricanes
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1971
1972 Hurricane
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979 Hurricane
Bay Annual Average
(ft3^-1)
82,100
94,300
72,800
58,700
73,400
76,000
64,400
81,400
66,400
77,300
78,000
64,800
52,400
61,900
49,000
79,000
131,800
95,200
76 , 900
103,100
84,400
80,100
91,300
113,800
5-Year
Average
76,260
73,100
61,220
97,180
92,400

                                   57                                               !
                                                                                    1
                                                                                    I
                                                                                     J

-------
TABLE V.  SUSPENDED SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND DISCHARGES OF SUSQUEHANNA
          RIVER TO THE CHESAPEAKE BAY (after Gross et al., 1978).
Calendar Year
Annual suspended sediment discharged
        (106 metric tons/yr.)
Above Dam                Below Dam
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
Agnes, 24-30 June 1972
1973
1974
1975
Eloise, 26-30 Sept. 1975
1976
1.5
1.7
>1.7**
nd
>2.0
>1.4**
11.3
7.6
3.2
1.7
>3.8
1.6
nd
0.7 (602)*
>0.3**
nd
0.32 (60%)*
>!.!**
1.0
33
30
1.2 (54%)*
0.8 (53%)*
11
9.9
1.2

nd * no data
* Percent discharged during annual spring flood
**Records incomplete for the year
                                   58

-------
          LIGHT AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS  IN CHESAPEAKE  BAY  SAV  COMMUNITIES

General Review of Photosynthesia

     Photosynthesis is  the process  by which  light  is  used as  the  energy  source
for the synthesis of organic compounds.  Three basic  steps  are  involved  in  the
process:  1) absorption of light energy by photosynthetic pigments;  2)
processing the captured light energy to produce the compounds ATP and NADPH;
and 3) the reduction of C02 using ATP and NADPH and the production of
carbohydrates.  The first two steps are light-dependent and collectively
referred to as the "light reaction."  The third step  is light-independent and
termed the "dark reaction."

     Photosynthetic pigments have characteristic  light energy absorption peaks
within the photosynthetically active region  of the spectrum.  Chlorophyll £
absorbs light more effectively  at higher wavelengths  ObOO  nm)  while accessory
pigments such as chlorophyll b_, carotenoids, and others are more  effective
absorbs at shorter wavelengths  (<600 nm).  Chlorophyll _a_  and  the  accessory
pigments transfer the absorbed  light energy  at varying efficiencies  to
specialized chlorophyll a_ molecules (P70U) where  it is used directly for
biochemical reactions.

     The photochemical  reactions are driven  by units  of light energy termed
photons (quanta).  Quantum energy is a function of wavelength;  quanta of
shorter wavelengths contain more energy than quanta of longer wavelengths.
Light energy transferred to P700 is most efficient as it  is used  directly in
the photosynthetic system while  light energy transfer via chlorophyll &_  and
accessory pigments is less efficient.  Quantum yield, the moles of QI produced
or CC>2 fixed per photon of light absorbed, may be  used to estimate the
transfer efficiency.

     The light utilization spectrum of a particular species is  termed the
action spectrum, a characteristic curve obtained  by measuring the- relative
photosynthetic output of intact  plant parts  at discrete wavelengths.  The
action spectrum is an important  feature since it  reflects the ability of a
species to adapt to various light quality regimes  (Fig. Id).  This is of
particular importance when considering photosynthesis of  submerged plants.  In
aquatic environments, spectral  shifts in light energy result  from the water
itself, suspended organic and inorganic materials, dissolved  organic compounds
and other water column  constituents.  (See Chpt.  3 for a  discussion  of the
relationship between the light quality environment of the Chesapeake Bay and
its potential effect on photosynthesis).

     A general approach to the  investigation of photosynthesis  as related to
total PAR radiation is  to construct light saturation  curves for various
species (Fig. lla).  An examination of photosynthesis-light curve? (P-I
curves) shows that photosynthesis (P) increases with  increasing irradiance  to
an optimal point (lopt) where over  a range of irradiance,  the photosynthetic


                                     59

-------
             Pmox	
              M

              01
              
              2
              o
                          1 I an4 2
Figure  11.   Diaj,ramatic  photosynthesis-1ipht  relationships Cseo  text  for
descriptior. ot parameters).

-------
system is saturated and maximum photosynthesis  (Pmax) occurs.   At  higher
irradianc", there may be a depression  in the photosynthetic  rate,  termed
photoinhibition.  The initial slope of  the curve  (AP/AI or a) and  Pmax  are  the
two major parameter used in describing P-I curves  (Jassby and  Platt, 1976).
a is a function of the light reaction of photosynthesis and  is  an  estimator of
the quantum yield.  PTOax " a function of the dark  reaction  and  is  influenced
by environmental factors or the physiological state of the plants  (Parsons  et
al., 1977).  The term 1^, proposed by Tailing (1957) is the  irradiance  at
which a linear extension of the initial slope intercepts  Pmax.   *k  ^8 regarded
as indicative of the plant's adaptation to its  light regime  (Steeman Nielsen,
1975).  I'fc is irradiance wht-re P - 0.5 Pmax and  is similar  to  the
Michalis-Menten half-saturation constant.  Ic is  the irradiance  at  the
compensation point, where photosynthesis equals respiration  (P  • R).

     Characteristic P-I curves are shown in Fig.  lib.  Plants adapted to high
and low light environments, termed respectively sun and shade species,  exhibit
different P-I curves.  Sun species (curve 3) generally exhibit  higher Pnax
values than shade species, which exhibit greater  a  and lower Ic  values  (curves
1 and 2).  In the aquatic environment, with reduced availability of light,
species exhibiting shade type photosynthesis (greater photosynthetic rates  at
low light intensities) are at an advantage if they  are not intertidally
exposed to high light levels.

Photosynthesis of Submerged Vascular Plants in Relation to Light and
Temperature

     In situ studies of submerged angiosperms point to the role  of  light in
seagrass production and distribution (Jacobs, 1979; Mukai et al.,  1980).  In a
study of Zostera in Denmark, Sand-Jensen (1975) showed a  positive  correlation
between leaf production and insolation over a nine-month  period.   Biomass and
photosynthetic rates of Posidonia declined with depth near Malta (Drew  and
Jupp, 1976); this probably was due to decreased light penetration with  depth.
In before and after studies of an estuary that was  closed to the sea, Nienhuis
and DeBree (1977) reported that the Zostera population increased in density
and extended to a greater depth; they  suggested that this was probably  due  to
an increase in water transparency,  van Tine (1977, 1981) found  a correlation
between reduced light transmission and  the biomass  and diversity of benthic
macrophytes including Thalas*ia, Halodule and Sringodium  in  an  estuary  in the
Gulf of Mexico.

     In situ light and manipulation experiments have provided evidence  of the
importance of light to seagrass production.  For  example, at the end of a
nine-month study during which ambient  light was reduced by 63%,  in  situ
Zostera densities were only 5* of that of the control (Backman  and  Barilctti,
1976).  In similar studies, Congdon and McComb  (1979) reported  that lower than
ambient light levels resulted in lower  Ruppia biomass; as the shading duration
increased, higher light  levels were required to sustain a high  biomass.

     Studies involving the epiphytic community, those organisms  directly
attached to submerged angiosperm blades, suggest  that the epiphytes have a
detrimental effect on the seagrass hosts, primarily due fo shading  of the
raacrophytes by the epiphytes.  Sand-Jensen (1977) reported that  Zostera
                                      61

-------
photosynthesis was reduced by up to 312 due  to a decreased  penetration  of
light and inorganic carbon through the epiphytic community  to  the  seagrass
blades.  Johnstone (1979) hypothesized that  the rapid  linear growth  of  Enhalus
leaves (up to 2 cm day"1) was related to a shading effect to epiphytes.
However, the net community productivity of the seagrass-epiphyte system  may
not be reduced.  It may be tnat the different pigment  complexes of the  various
epiphytes provide optimum light absorption during seasonally changing aquatic
light conditions.  Both Kiorbe (1980) and Phillips et  al. (1978) provided data
to indicate that epiphytic development suppressed macrophyte growth.  The data
of Penhale and Smith (1977) suggested that an epiphytic community may be
beneficial in certain environments.  For Zostera exposed at low tide, the
epiphytes prevented desiccation damage by trapping a film of water and
probably reducing the photoinhibitory effect of high light.

     In addition to light, temperature also  influences submerged macrophyte
distribution and productivity rates (Biebl and McRoy,  1971; Drew 1978) van
Tine, (1977, 1981) found reduced biomass and diversity of benthic macroalgae
and seagrasses in estuarine waters impacted  by a lower plant induced thermal
plume.  The biogeography of marine and brackish water  plants points  to a
temperature effect on world wide distribution; for example, genera such  as
Zostera, Ruppia, Phyllospadix, and Posidonia, occur mainly  in  temperature
zones while genera such as Thalassia, Syringodium, and Halophila occur mainly
in subtropical and tropical zones.  Drew (1979) reported that  the Pmax of four
seagrass species collected near Malta increased in direct proportion to
temperature up to temperatures (30-35°C) where tissue  damage occurred;
decreases were not observed at environmental temperatures.  In contrast,
Penhale (1977) observed a decline in Pmax from 22 to 29°C for  Zostera in North
Carolina where environmental temperatures reach 34°C.  The  co-existence  of
species such as Ruppia and Zostera in the lower Chesapeake  Bay may be a  result
of differential responses to both temperature and light as  apparently is the
case in a Myriophy1lum-Va1lisneria association described by Titus and Adams
(1979).  They reported that a greater   for  Vallisneria, in conjunction  with
the temperature dependence 01 photosynthesis, resulted in a temporal
partitioning of resources.  Vallisneria was  apparently favored by midsummer
conditions and Myriophyllum by spring and fall conditions.
     Sun and shade
(Spence and Crystal
exhibit higher Pmax
lower Ic values and
to a wide range of
under high and low
the I
     opt
value four
species have been described for submerged macrophytes
,  1970a, b; Titus and Adams, 1979).  Sun species generally
 values than shade species which exhibit greater   and
 lower dark respiration rates.   Certain species can adapt
light conditions.  Bowes et al. (1977) cultured Hydrilla
irradiances; subjecting the plants to high light increased
-fold.  Plants grown under low lipht achieved Ic and Ij< at
lower intensities.
     In seagrass systems, pigment relationships generally vary with  light
quantity or with position within the leaf canopy.  The adaptive capability of
seagrass pigment systems to the light environment has been  shown  in  various
studies.  For example, Wiginton and McMillan (1979) reported chat the total
chlorophyll content was  inversely related to light for several Caribbean
seagrasses collected at various depths.  For seagrasses cultured  at  several
light levels, the total  chlorophyll content increased with  deceasing quantum

-------
flux (McMillan and Phillips, 1979; Wiginton and McMillan,  1979).  Within                 !
individual meter-long Zostera leaves, the chlorophyll £ to  chlorophyll  b_ ratio          j
varied significantly, with  the  lowest ratio at  the basal  portion  of  the plant            I
(Stirban, 1968).  In a detailed study of chlorophyll relationships in a
Zostera system, Dennison (1979) observed no substantial  variation in total               -
chlorophyll content within  the  leaves as a function of  depth  of the  leaf                 |
canopy in integrated samples along a depth gradient within  the bed;  however,             ;
the chlorophyll a^ to chlorophyll b_ ratio decreased from  the apical to basal              '
portion of the leaves.

     Although the physiological photosynthesis-light relationship ultimately
determines the light levels at  which plants grow, the morphology  of  individual
plants and the community canopy structure may play an important role in
production and species distribution.  In a study of Myriophyllum  and
Vallisneria, Titus and Adams (1979) observed that the former  had  682 of its
foliage within 30 cm of the surface while the latter had  622  of its  foliage
within 30 cm of the bottom.  Myriophyllum, an introduced  species, has often
displaced the native Vallisneria; a contributing faactor  is probably the
ability of Myriophyllum to  shade Vallisneria.   In a detailed  community
structure analysis of a monospecif'c Zostera community  across a depth
gradient, Dennison (1979) concluded that changing leaf  area was a major
adaptive mechanism to decreasing light  regimes.

PHOTOSYNTHESIS-LIGHT STUDIES IN CHESAPEAKE BAY

     Investigations of photosynthesis-light relationships  carried out through
the Chesapeake Bay Program  can  be categorized into three  general  experimental
designs.  In the first, P-l curves were constructed for  the four  dominant
species  in the Chesapeake Bay system, Myriophyllum spicatum and Potamogeton
perfoliatus in the upper Bay (Kemp et al., 1981) ancl Zostera  marina  and Ruppia
maritima in the lower Bay (Wetzel et al., 1982).  These  experiments  utilized
whole plants or leaves subjected to various light intensities (created  through
the use  of r.eutral density  screens) and various temperatures.  Kemp  et  al.
(1981) utilized microcosms  in which the effects of various  concentrations of
phytoplankton and other suspended solids on light penetration and Potamogeton
photosynthesis were determined.  Wetzel et al.  (1982) made  in situ community            •
metabolism measurements und°r a wide range of natural light regimes.  In
certain  experiments, neutral density screens were used  to  shade the  community
on a short term basis.
                                                                                        I
P-I Relationship of Major Species

     P-I curves were constructed for whole plants of M_.  spicatum  and P_.
perfoliatus at 21eC (Kemp et a!., 1981) (Fig. 12).  Both  species  exhibited the         |
characteristic photosynthetic response  of green plants  to  light with                   J
saturation occurring between 600 and 800 uE m~* s~l.  Myriophyllum exhibited a
greater  Pmax and greater 1^ than Potamogeton; however,  the  two species                  i
exhibited similarct.  Althou&u  these species occur in the  same general  locale,
they did not forn dense, mixed  bed stands where they would  be in  direct
competition for light.

                                      63

-------
             a
             a*
             a>
             E
            UJ
            I
            V)
            O

            O
            I
            a.
            Q.
            a
                        P max
                                         MYRIOPHYLLUM  SPICATUM
Pmox
i     200
                                            600
                          LIGHT  INTENSITY, M EINSTEINS  m's
                                  1000

                                 .-2.-1
Figure 12.  Photosynthesis-light carves  for  two  species  of upper Chesapeake

Bay submerged vascular plants (after Kemp  et al.,  1981).
                                        MHUHi
                                                                                   A

-------
     We determiu.-id  the  photosynthetic  response  to  light  and temper.-Jiure for
isolated Z_. marina  and _R_.  maritime  leaves.   Since  these  species  co-exist  in
the lower ChespecVe Bay,  an  evaluation of  the photosynthetic parameters of
each species might  suggest competitive strategies.   Experiments  carried out at
six temperatures and under natural  light  indicate  that  light saturation of
Zostera occurs at about 300 yE m~^  s~* while for Ruppia  light  saturation
requires about 700 yE m~^  s"*.   Differences  in  Pmax  between Zostera  and Ruppia
were observed and appear  related to  temperature.   At  wanner temperatures,
Ruppia exhibits a higher  Pn,ax  tnan  Zostera while the  situation is  reversed at
colder temperatures (e.g.  Fig. 13).  A summary  of  the data  shows that  Ruppia
exhibits the greater Pmax at temperature  >8°C (Table  VI).   A comparison
between the two species shows  that  Zostera generally  exhibits  a  greater o;
this suggests a competitive  advantage  for  Zostera  at  lower  light levels.

     The data from  these  experiments suggest mechanisms  for the  species
distribution of Ruppia  and Zostera  in  the  lower Chesapeake  Bay:   Ruppia forms
single species stands in  shallow intertidal  to  shallow  subtidal  areas  where
high light and high temperatures are prevalent  during the  summer.  Ruppia  is
generally more efficient  at  the  higher light and temperature regimes  in these
habitats.  Zostera, which has  the greater  depth range,  is  adapted  to  much
lower light conditions  as  indicated  by the lower light  saturation  point and
greater a.  In the  mixed  bed areas,  Ruppia is always  somewhat  shaded  by the
longer leaved Zostera.  During the  winter  periods  of  greater water clarity,
Ruppia receives sufficient light to  survive. During  summer periods,  its
higher Pmax probably contributes to  its survival capability during the period
of greatest light attenuation.

     Kemp et al. (1981) compared values of photosynthetic  parameters  taken
from the literature on  submerged angiosperms (Table  VII).   Despite the fact
that these parameters were obtained  under  a  wide range  of  experimental
conditions and over a wide range of  biogeographical  areas,  the values  are
rather similar.  Pmax>  which is  a function of the  dark  reaction  under  optimal
environmental conditions  or  a  function of  the inhibitor  under  suboptimal
conditions, ranged  from 0.9  to 3.7  mg  C g~*  hr~*.   l\  ranged  from 110 to
225 yE m~2 s-1 and  I'k  from  70 to 350  yE m~2 s"1.

     The fact that  submerged angiosperms  have similar photosynthetic  patterns
is useful from the  management  point  of view  where  decisions often must be
based on information from only one  or  two  species.  However, to answer  detailed
questions concerning species competition  or  species  adaptations, it  is
necessary to determine  the interrelationship of photosynthetic patterns,
pigment complement, plant  morphology and  community  canopy  structure.

     Thus, features in  addition  to  photosynthetic  parameters help determine
plant community photosynthesis.   Canopy structure  and chlorophyll content  were
determined for a Ruppia-Zostera  bed  in the lower Chesapeake Bay  (Wetzel et
al., 1982).  Both Ruppia  and Zostera showed  a concentration of leaf  area
(surface available  for  light absorption)  at  the lower portion  of the  canopy
where less light penetrates  (Fig. 14). This probably allows for a greater
overall net community photosvnthesis than  if there  were  a  uniform  vertical
distribution of leaf area.   Highly  significant  differences  were  observed
between the vertical stratification  of leaf  area of  Ruppia  and Zostera.
                                      65


-------
                                            AUGUST 29,1979
                   90-1
                                       SO    40    SO    «0    70
                                         LIGHT LEVEL (Ptrctnl Ambiml)
                                                                     •0
                   50
£ 30
«
v>
ui
5 zo
I
a. 10


   0-1
                                           JANUARY 29, I960
                                       Sostrro
                                                                 LIGHT *2)E m
                            10    20    30    40     90    10
                                         LIGHT LEVEL (P»rt»(ll
                                                                TO     W     >0     100
Figure  13.  Photosynthesis-light  curves  for  two species of lower Chesapeake
Bay submerged  vascular  plants from A mixed bed (Light  is total  light flux
during  4 h **C incubations).

-------
TABLE VI.  PHOTOSYNTHETIC PARAMETERS OF RUPPIA MARITIMA AND ZOSTERA
           MARINA LEAVES AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES.  (LIGHT - total
           light flux during the 4h ^C incubations).

TEMP
CO
1
8
12
18
21
28
LIGHT
(E in'2)
5.0
22.1
15.1
21.8
14.5
12.0
Pmax (°>g C
Ruppia
2.15
3.12
3.91
2.60
3.82
2.39
Zostera

2.66
3.25
2.15
2.15
3.55
1.31
INITIAL
Ruppia
0.18
0.41
0.16
0.35
0.27
0.52
SLOPE
Zostera

0.70
1.41
0.55
0.34
0.27
0.69
                                   67
                                                                                       i
                                                                                      J

-------
TABLE VII.  SUMMARY OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS-LIGHT  EXPERIMENTS  FOR  SELECTED
            SUBMERGED AQUATIC .JJGIOSPERMS3 (from  Kemp  et  al.,  1981).
                                                                                          I

Plant Species
Zostera marina
M ii
Thalassia testudinum
Cymodocca nodosa
Halcdule uninervis
Syringpdium fili forme
Ruppia maritima
Vallisneria americana
Ceratophy Hum demersum
ii ii
Ranunculus pseudof luitas
Myriophyllum spicatum
ii ii
ii it
Potamogeton pectinatus

Pmaxb
1.5
2.2
1.2
1.3
1.7
2.5
2.6
1.5
1.6
3.7
1.9
2.2
3.2
2.2
3.3
2.8
1.9
1.3
0.9
1.1
Light
I'k
140
170
167
184
225
170
140
130
140
225
123
130
1J5
130
115
215
110
200
195
140
Parameters0
iir IG^
K
28
220
280
345
320
210
220
175
220
290
236
100
80
230
150
180
70
290
350
230
Drew
145
50
40
50
120
30
30
20
25
30
60
25
Reference
1979
Penhale 1977
Me Roy 1974
Sand-Jensen 1977
Buesa 1975
Capone et al. 1979
Beer & Waisel 1979
Drew 1978
Bear & Waisel 1979
Buesa 1975
Nixon & Oviatt 1973
Titus & Adams 1979
Van et al. 1976
Guilizzoni 1?77
Westlake 1967
Titus & Adams 1979
Van et al. 1976
Kemp et al. 1981
Westlake 1967
Kemp et al. 198'

    Most  of  these  data  were  interpolated  from graphical  relations  provided
    by respective  authors.
     ,nax
        light-saturated photosynthetic rate  in mg C g~l h~*, where 02
production data were converted to C assuming PQ * 1.2.

Light variables:  I'^ * half-saturation constant; l^ * intersection of
initial slope and Pmax» IG * 1^8nt compensation point where apparent
production approaches zero.  Light data converted to PAR units  (pE m~2
s"1) assuming 1 mW cm"2 » 2360 Lux - 0.86 cal cm"2 h"1 *
s"1 (Hansen & Biggs, 1979).

Values of Ig are not available for experiments using the
which cannot measure negative net photosynthesis.
                                                              46
                                                                     ~2
                                                              14
                                                                C method
                                        68

-------
                            AUGUST   I960
      CO
      ffi
      co
          50 H
          40 H
          30 H
          20 H
          IOH
Ruppia  BED
Ruppia  mari ti ma

MIXED  BED
Rupp 10 maritima
                                "1
                 Zostera  BED
                 Zostero  manna
                             MIXED  BED
                             Zoster a  mar ma
                                             L
                         I           20          I           2

                               LEAF  AREA  INDEX

Figure 14.  Vertical distribution of one-sided leaf area  index (m~2 plant m~2
substrate) for Ruppia and  Zostera at three vegetated sites in the lower
Chesapeake Bay.
                                   69

-------
Ruppia exhibits much greater  leaf area  than Zoatera at  the  lower  canopy
(0-10 cm above substrate); this probably contributes  to  its  success  in  the
mixed bed areas where  it  is shaded by Zostera.

     Preliminary estimates of pigment content of Ruppia  and  Zostera  suggest
differences between species (Fig. 15).  The highest concentrations of
chlorophyll were at mid-canopy for Zostera and the top-canopy  for Ruppia
(Wetzel et al., 1982).  Ruppia also showed a higher total chlorophyll
concentration than Zostera.  This higher chlorophyll  concentration in
combination with its canopy structure is an adaptation which contribute to
Ruppia'a success in mixed bed areas.

     Microcosm Studies

     The microcosm studies of Kemp et al. (1981) showed  a negative effect of
suspended sediments on Potamogeton photosynthesis (Fig.  16).   Two
concentrations of fine sediment particles (< 64 ym in diameter),  kept in
suspension with recirculatinv pumps, reduced light availability in the  two
treatments and resulted in significantly lower photosynthesis  of  Potamogetcn
compared to a control.  Kemp et al. attributed about  half the  decrease  in
productivity of treated systems to the  accumulation of epiphytic  solids on the
plant leaves.  Further consideration of the microcosm data involved
calculating regressions between chlorophyll ji or filterable  solids and  light
attenuation coefficients.  From these,  it was concluded  that in the  northern
Bay, the effect of light  attenuation by phytoplankton would  be small while the
effect of non-chlorophyllous suspended  sediments on photosynthesis would be
more significant.

     In Situ Studies of Community Response to Light

     The effect of light  on plant community metabolism was investigated in
upper and  l^er nhcodye^'ke Bay grassbeds.  In both areas, community  metabolism
was estimated as oxygen production in large, transparent incubation  chambers.
During these experiments, detailed measurements of light energy (PAR) reaching
the plants were made.  In some experiments, neutral density  screens  were used
to decrease available  light similar in  design to the  *^C studies  on  individual
species.

     A summary of the  upper Bay Potamogeton community response to light is
presented in Fig. 17, which includes estimates from both early (May) and late
(August) periods it. the grow'ng season  (Boynton, unpublished data).  The Ic of
the plant community occurs at about 200 uE m~2 s~* and  the data suggest that
the community is not light-saturated in the ranges of measured in situ  light
flux.  An analysis of  the seasonal trends suggested no differences in the
regression of light and community metabolism between  seasons.

     Based on these and other studies,  Kemp et al. (1981) concluded  that grass
communities in the upper  Bay are often  light limited.   For example,  actual
subsurface light data  and three theoretical light extinction coefficients were
used to calculate light penetration to  a depth of 0.5 m  above  the substrate;  a
depth below which Potamogeton grows (Fig. 18a, b).  Photosynthetic parameters,
Ic, I'fc and Pmax were  calculated from a P-I curve (Fig.  18c).  These
                                      70

-------
           40-i
                                mg  Chi
Figure 15.  Vertical distribution of total  chlorophyll  for Ruppia and Zostera
from a mixed bed area (Values  + standard  error,  n »  3.
                                     71

-------
ft
ui

»-
z
               o
               I
               Q.
               oc
               <
               Q.
               '£
               UJ
               a.
                E

               in
                     1.0 -
                     40
                     20
                     150
               7-    100
         -(b)
                     50
                         (Q )
PMOTOSYNTHETIC


  RESPONSE TO

SEDIMENT LOADING
                           CONTROL
                                     HIGH TREATMENT (M>
            LIGHT AVAILABILITY
                                       - o --- o— -
           (C)    j.
                           SUSPENOED  SOLIDS
                                24        6       6       10


                               TIME OF EXPERIMENT, DAYS
Figure 16.  Effect of (c) total suspended solids (TSS) on (b) light

availability and (a) rate of photosynthesis of Potamogeton perfoliatus in

microcosms (after Kemp et al., 1961).
                                      72
                                                                                       i:

-------
       30-i
       20-
  o

  ?
  u
  u
  0
  o
  
-------
         1500-
         1000-
'E


IU

at.



x



u.
      X
      o
      in
      to
      o

      o
      I
      a.
      2
      a.
          500 -4
                                    AIR-WATER INTERFACE
                             lUplillllllllllllllllll
          250-
          500-
                    "T"~T  ' ""     "  T

                   0900         1200        1500

                               TIME  (hr)
                                          P perfoliatus
                   200
                                                   1000
                                                                                      i i
                            LIGHT FLUX
                                         m
                                             s')
Figure IK.  Oiagranatic  representation  of  surface (a) snd underwater (b) light

flux at Tofld's Cove,  upper (Jnesapcake Bay  calculated for three lipht
extinction (K) coefficients.
                        Ic,  I
                                      and
                                          1 r.ia x
calculated from P  - I  curve  of
Potamogeton perfoliatus (c)  (after  Kaumeyer i-t al.,  19S1).

-------
parameters are identified  for  each  light  penetration curve an«J suggest thai
for much of the daylight period,  the  plant  community is  light-limited.  At the
early morning and dusk periods of the  day,  the  community is apparently
heterotrophic.

     In the lower Bay, community  metabolism studies  were carried out in three
areas: jluj>jp_ia-dominated, Zostera-dominated  and  a  mixed Ruppia-Zostera area
(Wetzel et al., 1982).  These  studies  were  conducted under a wide range of in
situ light situations and  under artificial  shading  conditions.  The shallow
Ruppia areas exhibit higher  light and  temperature regimes than the deeper
Zostera areas; the mixed bed is intermediate between the two.

     Short term shading expeiintents resulted in a general decease in community
metabolism for both Ruppia and Zostera communities.   For the Ruppia site,
apparent productivity increased with  increasing light to a midday peak and
decreased during  the early afternoon  (Fig.  19).   Based on P-I  curves, Ruppia
was  light-siturated during much of  the day  and  would not be photoinhibited.
The unexplained afternoon  depression,  which occurred while light was
increasing, nay be due to  increased community respiration rates under these
summer high temperatures.  A similar  pattern was  observed for  the Zostera
site, where shading also resulted in  decreased  apparent  productivity (Fig.
20).  In contrast, the afternoon  depression in  productivity rates was not  as
dramatic as in the Ruppia  bed  and this trend in Zostera  seemed to follow the
decreasing light  availability  unlike  the  trend  in Kuppia.  These results are
similar to those  found throughout the  study and suggest  differences between
the  two communities.

     Plots of apparent productivity vs.  light flux  at the top  of the canopy
were used to compare all three habitats (Fig. 21).   Differences among the
three sites were  observed  for  these summer  experiments.   Both  the Ruppia and
the mixed bed areas showed decreases  in apparent  productivity  at the highest
light fluxes.  The Zpstera site,  which did  not  receive the high light that the
other sites received, showed no decrease  in rates.   P-I  curves for the
seagrass species  showed no photoinhibition, even at  high summe: temperatures,
and  suggested that the Pmax of Ruppia  should be greater  than Zosfera at this
time of the year.  Zostera appears  adapted  to lower  light levels as evidenced
by its high apparent productivity rates.
     The  erratic  pattern  of  data  points  and  greater number of negative rates
 for Ruppia  strongly  suggest  «  different  community behavior.   This  patrern mcy
 be due  to differences  in  comirunity  respiration rat s,  plant  species
 photorespiration  rates  or the  photosynthetic  pattern of other primary
 producers such  as macro-  and microalgae.   The mixed bed site shows an
 intermediate  pattern,  suggesting  an interactive effect  of  the presence of both
 species of  seagrass.

     A  summary  of  linear  regression analyses  of apparent productivity vs.
 light flux  at the top  of  the canopy for  the  three areas is presented  in Table
 VIII.   At the community level,  the  correlation coefficient,  r,  is  strongly
 influenced  by season,  with the  lower  values  generally observed  for the winte-
 months. These are  the  times  of  year of  clearest water and  the specific rate
 asymptotically  approaches Pmax«   Therefore the linear relationship does not
;  ,1
i
                                       75

-------
   1400
               oeoo      toco      1200      i4oo
                                TIME  OF  DAY (hr)
                                                      1600
1*00
Figure  19.   Apparent proouctivity  and  light flux at the. canopy  top  vs.  time of
day for Ruppia  experiments at  100,  71,  50 and 30% of ambient  light  at  the
canopy  top.

                                       76

-------
         I8OO-
      '-  1600-
      ui  1400-
      x  1200-
      ,_  1000-
      z
      o
      -1  8CXH
         600-
                       LI6HT
                                                           Zot*ro SHADE
                                                              16 JUL 80
  -5OO


  -400


  -3OO


  -ZOO


  -100


  -  0


  --IOO


  --200
e

-------
o
«
o>
5
                        ..'•1.
                                               -10
                                                                                        V
                                                                                        X
                                               -O
3
-l
»

, o
                                                                                       *J  
-------
TABLE VIII.  APPARENT 02 PRODUCTIVITY AND LIGHT:
             ANALYSIS FOR LOWER BAY STUDIES.
LINEAR REGRESSION


DATE
14 Feb 80
21 Feb 80
19 Mar 80
29 Apr 80
2 May 80
2 Jun 80
5 Jun 80
9 Jul 80
16 Jul 80
19 Aug 80
23 Sep 80
7 May 80
11 Jul 80
21 Aug 80
25 Sep 80
26 Sep 80
5 May 80
14 Jul 80
[mg 02 in
AREA N
Zostera 33
36
H 31
20
11
" 20
30
57
" 76
" 16
H 27
Ruppia 10
" 83
11 26
" 10
" 16
Mixed 28
50
hr~* vs.
m
68.1
78.0
65.4
280
582
307
286
96.5
124
89.2
108.1
363
52.5
385
242.5
323.2
89.7
77.9
E m~2 hr'1
b
86.5
157
105
-183
-267
-472
-309
-147
- 67.1
- 8
-------
adequately describe the photosynthetic response.  This  is  true  for  all
measures taken at or near Pmax.

     In the Zostera community, maximum rates occur  in the  spring  and  early
summer.  Over this period, the estimated community  light compensation point
progressively increases, due to increased respiration,  to  the point  that  daily
community production is negative.  This corresponds to  the characteristic
mid-summer die-off of Zostera in  these areas (Wetzel et al., 1982).   Except
for winter and early spring (February and March), the community as a  whole is
light-limited.

     The Ruppia community dominates the higher  light and temperature  areas of
the bed.  Maximum rates of apparent photosynthesis occur during the summer and
they corroborate the earlier conclusions that Ruppia has both higher  Pmax and
Ic characteristics.  Some data suggest that community respiration inceases in
early afternoon during high light and temperature conditions.  These
conditions are prevalent at mid day low tides during July  and August.
Overall, Ruppia dominated communities in the lower Bay  appear adapted to
increased light and temperature regimes and do not appear  light limited.

     For the Chesapeake Bay system as a whole,  these data  and similar studies
completed in upper Bay suggest an extreme sensitivity of Bay grasses  to
available light.  These data also agree very well with  information on other
geographical areas and species.  Our general conclusion is that light and
factors governing light energy availability to  submerged aquatic vascular
plants are principal controlling  forces for growth and  survival.

                                    SUMMARY

     The apparent optical properties of the Chesapeake  Bay indicate a
light-limited environment for benthic photosynthesis.   Water per se,  suspended
particles and dissolved compounds all interact  to selectively absorb  those
wavelengths most important for autotrophic production.  Plant oigment systems
are adapted for efficient light energy capture  in relatively narrow bands.  In
many cases, it is precisely rhese wavelengths that are  most rapidly attenuated
in the estuarine water column.  Diffuse downwe 11 ing attenuation coefficients
in upper and lower Bay communities indicate a severe attenuation of light
energy in the photosynthetically  important violet-blue  (400 to 500 nm) region
of the spectrum.  There is a progressive increase in attenuation in these
spectral regions during the critical spring growing season for SAV.
Comparison of vegetated and non-vegetated areas in the  Chesapeake Bay suggests
lower attenuation during spring in the vegetated areas  (see Chpt. 3 for
details).  Kaumeyer et al. (1981) also reported significant differences in PAR
attenuation for a vegetated site  in the upper Bay.

     There is a much larger data  base on plant  response to PAR light  energy
for the Chesapeake Bay as well as other bodies of water.  The dominant plant
species in the Bay show the classical, hyperbolic photosynthetic response to
increasing PAR.  Specific plant response studies suggest physiological
differences among species.  Tha dominant upper  Bay species, Hyriophyllum
spicatum and Potamogeton perfoliatus, light-saturate between 600 and  800 vE
m ^ sec"* but differ in Pmax and  *k'  Q' spicatum appears  to higher
                                      80


-------
light conditions than £. perfoliatus.   In  a  similar  manner,  the  dominant lower
Bay species, Ruppia maritima and  Zostera marina,  appear  physiologically
different with regard  to lignt  response.   j*. maritima  is adapted to high light
and temperature while Z_, marina is adapted to  lower  light  regimes  and  is
stressed at higher, summer  temperatures.

     In situ studies of entire  plant communities  in  both Maryland  and  Virginia
indicate that the communities generally operate under  suboptical light
conditions.  There was no apparent light saturation  reached  for  upper  Bay
communities, i.e., net apparent community  productivity did not asymptotically
approach a maximum value.   Studies in  lower  Bay communities  suggest that 2,
marina is  light-limited during  most of its growing season.  Only in the
shallower jl. maritima  areas did the community  phocosynthetic  response  become
light-saturated and perhaps photoinhibited at  times.   These  results indicate
that at least in terms of total PAR energy and probably  because  of the extreme
attenuation in the 400 to 500 run  region noted  earlier, submerged plan''
communities in Chesapeake Bay are generally  light-stressed.

     Historical data relative to  lignt (secchi disc, chlorophyll _a and
indirectly nutrients)  and the past distribution and  abundance of submerged
aquatics indicate progressive Bay wide changes in systems  structure and
function.  Heinle et al. (1980) and Orth et  al. (1981) discuss these in
detail.  In terms of Bay grasses  and the light environment,  twc  overall
conclusions of these reports are  particularly  important.   Heinle et al. (1980)
have noted and documented the generalized  increase in  nutrients  (and loadings)
and chlorophyll concentrations  in major tributaries  of the Chesapeake  Bay over
the past several decades.   Orth et al. (1981,  1982)  concluded for  roughly the
same time  scale that the general  pattern of  disappearance  of  submerged plant
communities followed a similar  "down-river"  pattern.   It also appears  that
upper Bay  and western  shore lower Bay  communities have been  the  most severely
impacted.  These conclusions together  with our studies on  the light
environment and photosynthesis-light relations in SAV  ecosystems suggest that
factors increasing diffuse  downwelling attenuation in  the  400-500  run region
are critical in controlling plant growth and survival.   The  specific factors
that appear to have the greatest  impact are  organic  and  inorganic  suspended
particles.  The presence of these particles  is directly  related  to land runoff
and indirectly to nutrient  addition.

     In summary, it appears that  Bay grasses are  living  in a  marginal  light
environment and that progressive  worsening of  water  quality  will further
stress the plant communities.   To conclude that light  has  been singularly
responsible for recent declines in the vegetation goes beyond the  data
Available.  But the data do indicate the extreme  sensitivity  of  the vegetation
to changes in available light.  The implicit assumption  that  over  the  past
several decades water  quality throughout the Bay  and particularly  in the
tribuaries has progressively declined  is a feasible  explanation  for the
corresponding decline  of Bay grasses.   Further changes in  these  parameters can
only affect Bay grasses in  an adverse  way.
                                      81

-------
                                LITERATURE  CITED

Anderson, F. E.   1980.  The  variation  in  suspended  sediment  and  water
     properties in the  flood-water  front  traversing a  tidal  flat.   Estuaries
     3:28-37.

Backman, R. W. and D. C.  Sarilotti.   1976.   Irradiance reduction:   effects on
     standing crops of  the eelgrass Zostera  marina  in  a coastal  lagoon.   Mar.
     Biol. 34:33-40.

Baker, K. S. and  R. C.  Smith.   1980.   Quasi-inherent characteristics  of  the
     diffuse attenuation  coefficient  for  radiance.  In,  S. Q.  Duntley,  (ed.)
     Ocean Optics VI, pp. 60-63, Proc.  Soc.  Photo-Optical  Instrumentation
     Engineers, Vol. 208.

Beer, S. and Y. Waisel.   1979.  Some  photosynthetic carbon fixation properties
     of seagrasses.  Aquat.  Bot, 7:129-138.

Biebl, R. and C.  P. NcRoy.   1971.   Plasir.atic  resistance and  rate of
     respiration  and photosynthesis of Zostera marina  at different  salinities
     and temperatures.  Mar.  Biol.  8:48-56.

Booth, C. R. and  P. Dustan.   1979.  Diver-operable  multiwavelength  radiometer.
     In:  Measurements  of Optical Radiations.  Soc. Photo-optical
     Instrumentation Engineering 196:33-39.

Bowes, G., T. K.  Van, L.  A.  Barrard,  and W.  T. Haller.   1977.  Adaption  to low
     light levels by Hydrilla.  J.  Aquat.  Plant Manage. 15:32-35.

Buesa, R. J.  1975.  Population, biomass  and  metabolic rates of  marine
     angiosperms  on the northwestern  Cuban shelf.   Aquat. Bot. 1:11-23.

Burt, W. V.  1953.  Extinction  of  light by filter passing matter in Chesapeake
     Bay waters.  Science 118:386-387.

Burt, W. V.  1955a.  Interpretation of spectrophotometer readings on
     Chesapeake Bay waters.   J. Mar.  Res.  14:33-46.

Burt, W. V.  1955b.  Distribution of  suspended materials in  Chesapeake Bay.
     J. Mar. Res. 14:47-62.

Burt, W. V.  1958.  Selective transmission of light in tropical  Pacific
     waters.  Deep-Sea  Res.  5.51-61.

Capone, D. G., P. A. Penhale, R. S. Oremland  and B. F.  Taylor.   1979.
     Relationship between productivity and N2 (C2H2) fixation  in a  Thalassia
     testudinum community.   .•imnol. Oceanogr.  24:117-125.
                                      82
                                                                                        H
                                                                                         i|

-------
Champ, M. A., G. A. Gould,  III, W.  E.  Bozzo,  S.  G.  Ackleson,  and K.  C.  Vierra.
     1980.  Characterization  of light  extinction and  attenuation in  Chesapeake
     Bay, August 1977.   In:   V. S.  Kennedy  (ed.),  Estuarine  Perspectives,
     Academic Press, Inc.,  N.Y.   pp. 263-277.

Clarke, C. L. and G. C.  Ewing.  1974.   Remote  spectroscopy of the sea for
     biological production  studies.  In:  N.  G.  Jerlov  and E.  Steemann-Nielsen
     (eds.), Optical Aspects  of Oceanography.  Academic Press,  N.Y.   pp.
     389-413.

Clarke, G. L. and H. R.  James.  1939.   Laboratory  analysis of the selective
     absorption of  light  by seawater.   J. Opt. Soc. Am. 29:43-55.
                                                                                            I

Congdon,  R. A. and  A. J.  McComb.   1979.   Productivity of Ruppia:  seasonal                   j
     changes and dependence on  light in  an  Australian estuary.   Aquat.  Bot.
     6:121-132.

Dennison, W.  1979.  Light  adaptation  of plants: a  model based  on the seagrass             i
     Zostera marina L.   M.  S. Thesis,  Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks.   69 pp.                      j
                                                                                            t
Drew, E.  A.  1978.  Factors affecting  photosynthesis  and its  seasonal                      !
     variation in the seagrasses  Cymodocea  nodosa  (Ulcria) Aschers,  and
     Posidonia oceanica  (L.)  Delile in the  Mediterranean.  J.  Exp. Mar. Biol.
     Ecol. 31:l"73-194.

Drew, E.  A.  1979.  Physiological aspects of  primary  production in seagrass.
     Aquat. Bot. 7:139-150.

Drew, E.  A. and B.  P. Jupp.   1976.   Some aspects of the growth  of Posidonia
     oceanica in Malta.   In:  E.  A.  Drew, J.  N.  Lythgoe and  J.  D. Woods
      (eds.), Underwater  Research, Academic  Press,  London,  pp.  357-367.

Dubinsky, Z. and T. Beraian.   1979.   Seasonal  changes  in the  spectral
     composition of downwelling irradiance  in  Lake  Kinneret  (Israel).  Limnol.
     Oceanogr. 24(4):652-663.

Evans, G. C.  1972.  The quantitative  analysis of  plant growth.  Univ.
     California Press, Berkley.   734 pp.

Fleischer, P., T. A. Gosink,  W. S.  Hanna, J.  C.  Ludwick, D.  E.  Bowker and  W.
     G. White.  1976.  Correlation  of  chlorophyll,  suspended  matter, and
     related parameters  of  waters ir. the Lower Chesapeake  Bay area to
     Landsat-1 imagery.   Inst.  of Oceanography,  Old Dominion  University
     Technical Report No. 28, Norfolk, Va.   125  pp.

Fletner, D. A., D. H. Hamilton,  C. W. Keefe, and  J.  A. Mihursky.  1970.   Final
     report to Office of Water  Resources Research  en  the effects of  thermal
      loading and water quality  of estuarine primary production.  Contract  No.
      14-01-0001-1979.  Office of  Water Resources Research.  U.S.  Dept.  of
      Interior, Washington,  D.C.   NRI Ref. No.  71-6, Chesapeake  Biological
     Laboratory, Solomons,  MD.
                                      83
                                                                                         ?
                                                                                         j

-------
Gates, D. M.  1971.  The  flow of energy  in  the  biosphere.   Sci.  Amer.
     224:88-103.

Cinsburg, R. N. and H. A. Lowenstam.   1957.  The  influence  of  marine  bottom
     communities on the depositional environment  of  sediments.   J.  Geol.
     66:310-318.

Gross, M. G., M. Karweit, W. B. Cronin,  and J.  R.  Schubel.   1978.   Suspended
     sediment discharge of the Susquehanna  River  to  Northern Chesapeake  Bay,
     1966 to 1976.  Estuarie* 1:106-110.

Guilizzoni, P.  1977.  Photosynthesis  of  the submergent  macrophyte
     Ceratophyllum demersum  in Lake Wingra.  Wise. Acad.  Sci.  Arcs  Lett.
     65:152-162.

Hartog, C. den.  1970.  The  seagrasses of the world.  North  Holland,
     Amsterdam.  275 pp.

Hartog, C. den. and P. J. G. Polderman.   1975.  Changes  in  the  seagrasses
     population of the Dutch Waddenzee.   Aquat. Bot.  1:141-147.

Heinle, D. R., C. F. D'Elia, J. L. Tatt,  J. S.  Wilson, M. Cole-Jones,  A. B.
     Caplins and L. E. Cronin.  1980.  Historical  review  of  water quality  and
     climatic data from Chesapeake Bay with emphasis  on  effects  of  enrichment.
     Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Chesapeake  Bay Program.
     Chesapeake Research  Consortium, Inc. Pub.  No. 84.   Univ.  Md. Ctr.
     Environmental and Estuarine Studies  No. 80-15 CBL.

Hurlburt, E. A.  1945.  Optics of distilled and natural  water.   J.  Opt.  Soc.
     Amer. 35:689-705.

Idso,  S.  B. and R. G. Gilbert.  1974.  On the universality  of  the Poole  and
     Atkins Secchi disk-light extinction  equation.   J. Appl. Erol.  11:399-401.

Inada, K.   1976.  Action  spectra for photosynthesis  in higher  plants.  Plant
     Cell Physiol. 17:355-365.

Jacobs, R. P. W. M.   1979.   Distribution  and aspects  of  the  production and
     biomass of eelgrass, Zostera marina  L., at Roscoff,  France.  Aquat. Bot.
     7:151-172.

James, H. R. and E. A. Birge.  1938.   A  laboratory study of  the  absorption of
      light by lake waters.   Trans. Wise.  Acad.  Sci.  31:154  pp.

Jsssby, A. D. and T. Platt.   19?6.  Mathematical  formulation of  the
     relationship between photosynthesis  and light for phytoplankton.  Limnol.
     Oceanogr. 21:540-547.

Jerlov, N. C.  1976.  Marine Optics.   Elsevier  Oceanography  Series  14,
     Elsevier Scientific  Publ. Co., N.Y.  231 pp.
                                      84

-------
Johnstone. I. M.  1979.  Papua  New Guinea  seagasses  and  aspects  of the biology
     and growth of Enhalus acoroides  (L. f.)  Royle.   Aquat.  Bot.  7:197-208.
Kalle, K.  1966.  The problem  of  Gelbstoff  in  the  sea.
     Ann. Rev. 4:91-104.
                                                        Oceanogr. Mar.  Biol.
Kaumeyer, K., W. R. Boynton,  L.  Lubbers,  K.  Staver,  S.  Bunker,  W.  M.  Kemp and
     J. C. Means.  1981.  Metabolism  and  biomass  of  submerged macrophyte
     communities in northern  Chesapeake Bay.   In:  W.  M.  Kemp, W.  R.  Boynton,
     J. C. Stevenson, and J.  Means  (eds.), Submerged  aquatic vegetation in
     Chesapeake Bay:  its ecological role  in  Bay  ecosystems  and  factors  leading
     to its  decline.  Final Report, U.S.  EPA,  Chesapeake Bay Program.
     Chapter  13.
                                                                      R.
Kemp, W. M., J. J. Cunningham, J. Perron, S. Garbrandt, M.  R. Lewis,
     Hanson, R. Twilley, W. R. Boynton, and J. C. Stevenson.  1981.
     Experimental observations of turbidity/light relations  and  their
     influence on submerged macroph\tes in northern Chesapeake Bay.  In:  W.
     M. Kemp, W. R. Boynton, J. C.  Stevenson and J. Means  (eds.).   Submerged
     vegetation in Chesapeake Bay:  its ecological role  in  Bay ecosystems and
     factors leading to its decline.  Final Report, U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay
     Program.  Chapter 1.

Kiefer, D. A. and R. W. Austin.   1974.  The effect of varying phytoplankton
     concentration on submerged light transmission in the  Gulf of California.
     Limnol. Oceanogr. 19:55-64.

Kiley, K. P.  1980.  The relationship between wind and  curent in the York
     River estuary, Virginia, April 1973.  Masters Thesis,  School of Marine
     Science, The College  of William and Mary.   195 pp.

Kiorbe, T.   1980.  Production of  Ruppia cirrhosa (Petagna)  Grande in mixed
     beds in Ringkobing Fjord (Denmark).  Aquat. Sot. 9:125-143.

Kranck, K.   1980.  Variability ot participate matter in a  small  coastal inlet.
     Can. J. Fish. Aquat.  Sci. 37:1209-1215.

McCluney, W. R.  1975.  Radiometry  of water turbidity measurements.  J. Water
     Pollut. Control Fed.  47:252-266.

Mcrtillian, C. and R. C. Phillips.   1979.  Differentiation  in habitat response
     among populations of  New World seagrasses.  Aquat. Bot. 7:185-196.

McRoy, C. P.  1974.  Seagrass productivity: carbon uptake  experiments  in
     eelgrass, Zostera marina.  Aquacuiture 4:131-137.

McRoy, C. P. and C. McMillan.  1979.  Production ecology and physiology of
     seagrasses.  In:  C.  P. McRoy  and C. Helferrich (eds.), Seagrass
     Ecosystems: A Scientific Perspective.  Marcel Dekker,  Inc., New York.
     pp. 53-87.
                                                                                        1
                                       85

-------
Mihursky, J. A. and W.  R.  Boynton.   1978.   Review  o."  Patuxent  River d«
-------
     phytopiankton pigments, dissolved  organic matter,  and  other  participate
     materials.  Limnol. Oceanogr. 26:671-689.

Riaux, C. and H. L. Douville.   1980.  Short-term  variations  in  phytopiankton
     biomass in a tidal estuary  in Northern  Brittany.   Estuarine  Coastal Mar.
     Sci. 10:85-92.                                                                          •
                                                                                             j

Sand-Jensen, K.  1977.  Effect  of epiphytes  on eelgrass  phorosynthesis.                      :
     Aquat. Bot. 3:55-63.

Sauberer, F. and F. Ruttner.   1941.   Die  Srahlunesverhaltnisse  der
     Binnengewasser. Akademic  Verlag, Berlin.

Scoffin, T. P.  1970.  The  trapping  and binding of  subtidal  carbonate
     sediments by marine vegetation  in  Bimini Lagoon,  Bahamas.  J.  Sed.
     Petrol. 40:249-273.

Scott, B. C.   1978.  Phytopiankton distribution and light attenuation  in Port
     Hacking Estuary.  Aust. J.  Mar.  Freshwater Res.  29:31-44.

Seliger, H. H. and M. E. Loftus.  1974.   Growth and dissipation of
     phytopiankton in Chesapeake  Bay.   II. A statistical ana.ysi.s of
     phytopiankton standing crops in the  Rhode and  West  Rivers  and  adjacent
     section of the Chesapeake Bay.   Chesapeake Sci.  15:185-204.

Spence,  B. H. N. and J. Chrystal.  197Ca.  Photosynthesis and zonation of                   ,
     fresh-water macrophytes.   I. Depth distribution  and shade  tolerance.  New                '„
     Phytol. 69:205-215.                                                                     f
                                                                                             i
Spence,  3. H. N. ar.d J. Chrystal.  lV70b.  Photosynthesis and zonation of                   t
     fresh-water macrophytes.   II. Adaptability of  species  of deep  and shallow               •
     water. New Phytol. 69:217-227.                                                          •

Steeman  Nielsen, E.  1975.   Marine photosynthesis with  special  emphasis  on the
     ecological aspects.  Elsevier,  Amsterdam.

Stevenson, J. C. and N. M.  Confer.   1978.  Summary  of available information  on
     Chesapeake Bay submerged  vegetation.  Fish and Wildlife Service
     Biological Services Program.  FWS/OBS/78/66, U.S.  Dept. of Interior.  335
     pp.

Stirban, M.  1968.  Relationship  between  the assimilatory pigments,  the
     intensity of chlorophyll  fluorescence and the  level of  the photosynthesis
     zone in Zostera marina L.  Rev.  Rouro.  Biol. Serv.  Bot.  13:291-295.

Tailing, J. F.  1957.  Photosynthetic characteristics  of some fresh-water
     plankton diatoms in relation to underwater radiation.   New Phytol.
     56:29-50.

Thompson, M. J., L. E. Gilliland  and L. F. Rosenfeld.   1979.  Light  scattering
     and extinction in a highly  turbid  coastal inlet.   Estuaries  2:29-50.
                                      87

-------
Titus, J. E. and M.  S. Adams.   1979.   Coexistence  and  the  comparative light
     relations of  the submersed  macrophytes  Myriophyllum spicaturn L. and
     Vallisneria americana Hichx.   Oecologia (Berl)  40:373-386.

Van, T. K., W. T.  Haller  and G.  Bowlec.   1976.   Comparison of the
     photosynthetic  characteristics of  three submersed aquatic plants.   Plant
     Phys-iol. 58:761-768.

van Tine, R. F.   1977.  An ecological  comparison of  the benthic  macroflora of
     a power plant  impacted estuary and  an adjacent  estuary.   Masters Thesis,
     Dept. of Botany, Univ. of  Florida,  Gainesville,  Fla.

van Tine, R. F.   1981.  Ecology  of  seaweeds  and  seagrasses in a  thermally
     impacted estuary in  the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.   In:   G. E.  Fogg and W.
     D. Jones (eds.), Proc. VHIth  Intl.  Seaweed Symp.,  Aug.  1974,  The  Marine
     Science l.abs  Menai Bridge,  Univ.  College of North Wales, Wales, U.K.  pp.
     499-5U6.

van Tine, R. F. and  R. L. Wetzel.   1983.  Seasonal variation  of  underwater
     spectral attenuation in shallow areas of the  Chesapeake  Bay.  Paper
     presented at  The 7th Internalicnal  hstuarine  Research Conference,  Oct.
     1983, Virginia  beacn, Va.

Westlake, C. F.   1967.  Son-e effects of  low  velocity currents, 01 the
     metabolism of aquatic macrophytes.   J.  Exp. Bot.  18:187-21)5.                     '

Wetzel, R. G. ar•.'  P. A. Penhale.   19 >0.   Transport of  carbon  and excretion of         ,
     dissolved organic caroon by leaves  and  roots/rhizomes in seagrass  and            j
     their epiphytes. Aquat. Bot.  6:149-158.                                          >
                                                                                       i
Wetzel, R. L., K.  L. Webb, P. A.  P.-nhale, ... J.  Orth,  D.  F.  Boesch,  G.  W.            j
     Boehlert and  J. V. Merriner.   1979.  The functional  ecology of  submerged        1
     aquatic vegetation in the  Lower Chesapeake  Hay.   Annual  Grant  Report U.S.       «
     EPA  R805974,  Ches.-.peake Bay Program, Ar.naoolis,  Md.

Wetzel, R. L., L.  Murray, R. F.  van Tine  and P.  A. Ppnhale.   1982.
     Photosynthesis, light resoonse and  metabolism of  submerged  macroph"te
     communities  in  the Lower Chesapeake  Bay.  Ir:   R. L.  Wetzel fed.),
     Structural and  Functional  Aspects  of the Ecology  of  Submerged  Aquatic
     Macrophyte Communities  in  the  Lower  Chesapeake  Bay,  Vol. I.  Final  Draft
     Report Grant  N'os. R8059"4  and  X0032'o-01 Envirorunenta 1  Protection  Agency,
     Annapolis, Md.

Wiginton, J. R. and  C. McMillan.   1979.   Chlorophyll composition under
     controlled  Light conditions  as related  tr>  the distribution  of  soagrasses
     in Texas and  the U.S. Virgin Islands.   Aquat. Bot. 6:171-184.

Williams, J.  197(.'.  Optical Propertios  of the  Sea.   U.S.  Naval  Institute,
     Annapolis, MD.  123  pp.

Williarrs, S. F.   1977.  Seagrass productivity:  the effects of light  on  carbon
     uptake.  M.S. Thesis, Vniv.  of Alaska,  Fairbanks.  95 pp.

Ver.tsch,  C. S    !9tJ.  The  influence ot  phvtoplankton  pigments on the colour
     of seawater.  Deep-Sea  Res.  7:1-9.

                                      8R

-------
                                                                             ''en
                         Chapter 3

    THE UNDERWATER LIGHT ENVIRONMENT OF SHALLOW REGIONS
OF THE LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY, ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SEAGRASSES
    AND ITS POTENTIAL FOR BENTHIC PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
              R. F. van Tine and R. L. Wetzel
           Virginia Institute of Marine Science
                 School of Marine Science
                College of William and Mary
                Gloucester Point, VA  23062
                                                                            L
                                                                              I

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION

     All plants, whether aquatic or terrestrial, differentially  absorb  the
energy of tpecific ranges of  light of different wavelengths via  characteristic
complements of photoreactive  pigment molecules located within subcellular
systems.  The energy thus absorbed by quantum amounts is utilized, with
varying spectral efficiency,  to drive the reactions of photosynthesis—- i.e.,
the synthesis of complex organic compounds  from simple inorganic  compounds
using fnt ohoton energy oi sunlight.

     Since  "he driving force  of all ecosystems* is light, the energetic basis
of life, the success or failure of an ecosystem ultimately depends on the
ability of  its primary producers to utilize efficiently the specific mix of
light energies available.  Gveen plants, both terrestrial and marine,
photosynthesize most efficiently in tha violet-blue (400-500 ran)  and
orange-red  (600-700 nm) regions of the spectrum (Halldal, 1974).  Inada (1976)
summarized  the action spectra literature for a diverse taxonomic  group  of
terrestrial angiosperms and found quite a consistent pattern.    The pattern
for the common estuarine green alga Ulva is remarkably similar (Levring, 1947,
1966; Haxo  and Blinks, 1950;  Halldal, 1974).  All show the highest rates of
photosynthesis in the above mentioned spectral region*.  Of course this is no
surprise.   Green plants appear green because they absorb blue and red light
and reflect green light!

     Although we are unaware  of any reported seagraas action spectra, it seems
reasonable  to assume that these plants are  aimi ar to their terrestrial
taxoaonic cousins and their marine ecological cousins with similar pigment
complexes — i.e., chlorophyll a, b and accessory pigments 6-carotene and
xarthophylls.  The chlorophylls are solely  responsible for the absorption  of
energy above 600 nm but that  below 500 nm is due to both accessory pigments
and chlorophylls a and b (Zscheile'and Comar, 1941; Zscheile et  al., 1942;
Govindjee and Govindjee, 1975).

     Seagrasses exist in an environment characterized by drastic  temporal  and
spatial fluctuations in light energy.  As light passes through the water
column it is attenuated by absorption and scattering due to the  water itself,
dissolved inorganic and organic substances, and suspended particles.
Differential spectral attenuation results in light quality shifts — color
changes.  These shifts can hove profound implications for benthic plants with
their genetically determined  finite range of usable light energies.

     Scattering — the change in direction  of light propagation  caused  by
diffraction, refraction and reflection due  to particles, water molecules and
dissolved substances — is wavelength dependent, but in an irregular and

*With the exception of  those  few driven  by  chemosynthesis.
                                      90

-------
complex manner (Jerlov,  1976).  Only 4-112  of  incident  irradiance  between
300-700 nm it reflected  from  the surface or backscattered  out  of the  oceanic
water column (Clark and  Ewing,  1974).  Absorption  is  a  thermodynamically
irreversible process wherein  photons are converted  into thermal, kinetic or
chemical energy.  Absorption  accounts  for moat  of  the observed attenuation of
light.  Forward and lateral scattering effectively  increases  the path-length
of light thereby exposing  it  to additional  absorption.   The major  particles in
estuaries are clays and  silts with  small diameters  which tend  to scatter light
of the shorter wavelengths of the visible spectrum  (blue end)  more than the
longer wavelengths.  Therefore  one  would expect greater attenuation of  blue
light than red light in  estuaries.2 Much of the attenuation  of the energy
contained in the long wavelengths  O600  r.^i) is  due  to either  the water
molecules themselves, as shown  by James  ant Birge  (1938) for  pure  water, or to
the water plus its dissolved  salts  (Clarke  and  James, 1939).   There is  little
difference in attenuation  between pure water and filtered  seawater (Yentsch,
1960); the effect of sea salts  is insignificant.  The energy  contained  in the
lower and upper PAR, violet-blue and orange-red, respectively,  is  particularly
susceptible to absorption  by  particulate matter (Burt,  1958;  Prieur and
Sathyendrauath, 1981). Chlorophyll  pigments in  the  water column associated
with phytoplankton and the breakdown products of plants also  absorb most
strongly in the blue and red.   Dissolved organic compounds ("yellow substance"
or Gelbatoff) greatly attenuate the shorter wavelengths (Kalle, 1966).  Thus,
since estuaries are loaded with a myriad of autochthonous  and  allochthonous
dissolved and suspended  substances, the  light energy  reaching  the  benthic
plants of an estuary is  likely  to be reduced in both  the red  and especially
the blue regions of the  spectrum ~ exactly those  portions to  which green
plants respond most efficiently photosynthetically.

     The small amount of available  Chesapeake Bay data  on  diffuse  downwelling
2 1 irradiance attenuation  indicates a  severe attenuation of  light  energy in
the photosynthetically important 400-500 nm (violet-blue)  region of the
spectrum.  Attenuation in  the short wavelengths is  particularly marked  in the
turbidity maximum region of the Bay at the  mouth of the Sassafras  River, and
at the mouth of the Patuxent  River  during August (Champ et al., 1980).   The
mean Bay attenuation coefficients calculated by Champ et al.  (1980) are about
1.0 m~l higher than Jerlov's  (1976) most turbid coastal water  classification.

     A comparison of attenuation coefficients  reported  for the Chesapeake Bay
and its tributaries is presented in Figure  1 along  with Jerlov's (1976)
standard k ( X) curve representing his most  turbid  coastal  water classification
(Type 9).  For the Chesapeake Bay,  the earliest measurements  of k(X)  were made
by Hurlburt (1945) (Fig. la).   His  values fall  in  the lower range  of  more
recent in situ measurements.  Champ et al.  (1980)  conducted a  light
characterization survey  of the  Chesapeake Bay during  August,  1977. Their mean
values are shown in Fig. la.  Specific site measurements made  by them in and
near the mouths of the Saaaafrass,  Patuxent, Potomac  and Chester Rivers appear
in Fig. Ic.  Their attenuation  measurements in  the  turbidity maximum  zone at
the mouth of the Sassafras River are the highest reported  for  the  Bay:   there
     Chapter  1  for  a more  detailed  discussion  of  marine optics.
                                       91

-------
ft1**1 T»iS»OD

   tlfti 'A01«3C
C»tl  '
                                           IM JS
                                   p* ^ in  M ***

                                  £    **  *
                                      tl -*  9  tl
                                  tj  hi     O -<
                                   tl  9   -~* A

                                   hi  «  hi  U   ti
                                      Is vo -« *•
                                      a r»    w
                                      tl »   •  O
                                                                                    w *•  • »
                                                                                    •    *   *•*
                                                                                       ««M o w  o
                                                                                       o -4 *><**
                                                                                          hi


                                                                                    — ?    M W
                                                                                    «j * e »i -«
                                                                                    « M -rf .H


                                                                                    « e « 0  9


                                                                                    • ti • «  o
                                                                                       hi 4J -< J
                                                                                    —• a.    ^

                                                                                    * * i * "a
                                                                                    -»    h.    «
                                                                                    u • *  g
                                                                                    ti m    5u
                                                                                    & 41 *O V*  V
                                   O T)  O  »  tl
                                      tl -4  *l CO
                                   e •«  a. o
                                   o  •     o  a
                                   4       *•*  v
                                       ?.    *  >
                                      X  •'«-'  hi
                                      •  X     9  •
                                   U A  I* O  U O
                                        A CO    *
                                      tl    9>  W 9«
                                    . .M  h. —  U -*

                                   "*  *  8   • S
                                   «  a 5   • —'  •

                                   9  •     •  •  •
                                   M tl  tl     hi

                                   £ 6 5  «•-  «
                                                         CM
                                                         er>

-------
i» nearly no available  light  below  SOU  nm.   Pierce  et  ai.  (1981)  intensively
monitored the Rhode River during  1980 and 1981.  Their annual  mean  attenuation
values for an uprivcr station and one at the mouth  of  the  river  are plotted in
Fig. Ib.  The upriver station was found to be  consistently more  turbid,
presumably due to  ita proximity to  autochthonous sources.    Maximum
penetration was at 575  ran and minima at 775  anrt 425 nm.  Attenuation
coefficients derived from 4t  irradiance measurements from  the  Rhode River
(Seliger and Loftus, 1974)  are also shown in the figure.

     The purposes  of the work reported  herein  were  to  (1)  describe  the
spectral light environment  of shallow areas  of the  Lower Chesapeake Bay,  (2)
determine the differences,  if any,  occurring between vegetated and  unvegetated
sites, and (3) relate any differences to potential  benthic photosynthesis.

                                    METHODS

     Downwelline diffuse 21 spectral irradiance was measured as
quanta*nm~^*cm~^*8~^ at 12  biologically significant wavelengths  (410, 441,488,
507, 520, 540, 570, 589, 625, 656,  671, 694, run ^ 5 nm).   The  measurements
were made with a Biospherical Labs  model Her-1000 multiwavelength
apectroradiometer  (Booth and  Dustan, 1979),  calibrated against  U.  S. Bureau
of Standards lamps every 6  months.  Calibration curves changed less than  0.5Z
indicating an extremely stable system.

     Measurements  were  taken  at 6 shallow sites «2m)  and  at one  relatively
deep site in the lower  Chesapeake Bay (Fig.  2).  The sites were  chosen  for
their vegetational history  -  all  but one having been vegetated by macrophytes
in the recent past (Orth, et  al., 1979).  Five of the  sites  were  located  on
the western shore  of the Lower Chesapeake Bay  in the York  River  and Mobjack
Bav.  The remaining 2 sites were  across the  Bay on  the eastern shore of
Virginia at Vaucluse Shores near  Hungar's Creek.    The Mumfort Is.  (York
River) and Severn  River (Mobjack  Bay) sites  were unvegetated but  had
previously been part of seagrass  beds.  There  were  healthy seagrass beds
(Zostera marina and Ruppia  maritime) at the  Guinea  Marsh,  Four Point Marsh
(Mobjack Bay) and  Vaucluse  Shores sites.  Measurements at  the  later site  were
made in corroboration with  in situ  productivity studies (Wetzel  et  al.,  1982;
Murray and Wetzel, 1982).   The Allen's  Is. site (York  River) represented  a
transitional vegetative state - natural populations had disappeared yet Orth
and colleagues (Orth, et al., 1979) had successfully transplanted it.
Furthermore, it appears that  a natural  population may  be returning  to this
site (K. Moore, personal communication, 1981). The deep site  station was
located across a sand bar and about 1 mile west of  the Vaucluse  Shores
vegetated site.  It was chosen as a reference  station.

     The diffuse attenuation  coefficient (kj)  for downwelling  2 1 irradiance
was chosen as the  parameter most  suitable for  characterizing the  light
environments at each site due to  its quasi-inherent nature.  It  has been  found
to be relatively insensitive  to changes in solar zenith angle  (Baker and
Smith, 1979), except for very large angles.
                                      93

-------
Figure 2.  Locations of lover Chesapeake Bay sites.  (1) Muafort Is., York R.
(unvcgetated), (2) Allen's Is., York R. (transitional), (3) Guinea Marsh
(vegetated), (4) Severn R. (unvegetated), (5) Four Point Marsh, Ware R.
(vegetated), (6) Vaucluse Shores (vegetated) (7) deep "Bay" Station  1 ni.
vest of aitt 6.
J

-------
     The diffuse downwelling attenuation  coefficient  is  defined  as

                              -1        dE (z)
                 kd(z)
                             E.(z)        dz
                              d
or
                          -  in  (-kd(z2-Zl))


where k•
estimated for a body of water with known kj  as  follows,


                         Ed(z2) - Ed(Z1)-e-kd(z2 ~  «1>


where _e is the base of  the natural logs.  The  attenuation coefficients
reported in this work were calculated between  depths  of  0.1  and  0.5  m as a
estimator of water column attenuation not associated  with air-water  or
water-substrate interface phenomena.  Hence, these  values are  a  function of
the inherent optical properties of the water bodies concerned.  Since Kd is
not a constant for water bodies leas than 10 m deep,  all comparisons between
sites and seasons were  made  for the  same depth interval, i.e., 0.1 to 0.5 m.
All such calculations were based on  irradiance  measures  taken  at these depths
between 1000 and 1400 e.s.t.  Variations in  k
-------
r
                 chemical energy  in  the  form  of  organic  matter  through  photosynthesis.   The
                 relative potential  PSR  thus  expresses the  relative  potential  efficiency of
                 photosynthesis given  a  specific irradiance distribution and a specific
                 absorption complex  (set of pigments).

                      All irradiance measurements were taken on the  sunny side of the boat well
                 away from the boat  shadow.   Each measurement recorded  represented the  mean of
                 from 250 to 500  scans taken  over approximately 30-60 sees.  This was done to
                 smooth out the effects  of water waves,  patchy  clouds,  and patchiness of
                 suspended particulates.

                      The western shore  stations were monitored several times  each jeason on
                 paired dates approximately 1 week  apart  selected  to coincide  with the
                 confluences of high tide with solar noon and low  tide  with  solar noon.  The
                 Vaucluse Shore site was monitored  at least every  other month  at  times  chosen
                 to accommodate productivity  studies being  made there (Wetzel  et  al., 1982;
                 Murray and Wetzel,  1982).

                                                     RESULTS

                      In order to facilitate  an  understanding of the possible  trends  in the
                 spectral distribution of underwater light  in the  shallow Lower Bay,  the data
                 for the seven Stations  monitored has been  summarized variously by month,
                 season, site and vegetational state.  All  mention of attenuation coefficients,
                 unless otherwise noted, refers  to  k
-------
                                   WINER
             <=>
             o
                                                               Legend
                                                               A BAY
                                                               x JNVEGETXTtD,
                                                               D VECETA1E.D,
                 400    450
500    550    600
 Wavelength (nm)
650
Figure 3.  Mean winter  spectral  attenuation at vegetated and unvegetated sites
in the lower Chesapeake  Bay.   (Bay  • Deep water station).
                                      97

-------
                                SPRING
            £ 3
           s>-,
              2-
            o
               400    450    bOO    550    bOO
                             Wavelength (nm)
                                                             Legend
                                                            x UN VEGETATED.

                                                            O VEGETAtO,
650    TOO
Figure 4.  Mean spring 1981 spectral attenuation at vegetated and unvegetated
sites in the lower Chesapeake Bay. (Bay • deep water station).
                                      98

-------
                              SUMMER
           o  2-
           o
400   450
                           500    560    600
                            Wavelengtn (nm)
                                                           Legend
                                                          A BAY
                                                          x UHVEGFA1.0.

                                                          D
TOO
Figure 5.   Mean  summer  1981 spectral attenuation at  vegetated and unvegetated
aitea in the  lower Chesapeake Bay.  (Bay • deep water  station).
                                      99

-------
                                AUUMN
            .0
            "a
            I
                                                             Legend
                                                            A BAY
                                                            x uNVEGGAt
                                                            0 VtCEIAtQ.
400   450
SOO    bt:0    feOO
 Wavelength (nrn)
                                                 b50    TOO
Figure 6   Mean autumn 198)  spectral  attenuation  at vegetated and unvegetated
sites in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.   (Bay • Deep water station).
                                     100

-------
TABLE I.  MEAN SEASONAL SHALLOW WATER SPECTRAL ATTENUATION  (a"1) LOWER
          CHESAPEAKE BAY, 1981 (z • .1, .5 m)
Winter
(nm)
410
441
488
507
520
540
570
58*
625
656
671
694
Veg.
1.14
.892
.566
.510
.460
.404
.371
.407
.563
.644
.731
.834
Unveg.
1.04
.868
.503
.435
.397
.364
.283
.317
.497
.522
.623
.679
Spring
Veg.
1.91
1.-2
1.14
1.02
.919
.813
.711
.735
.907
.956
1.06
1.11
Unveg.
2.48
2.04
i.45
1.28
1.14
.973
.841
.858
.987
1.05
1.18
1.22
Summer
Veg.
3.07
2.70
1.79
1.60
1.41
1.22
1.08
1.09
1.24
1.28
1.41
1.43
Unveg.
3.08
2.62
1.78
1.58
1.40
1.19
1.00
1.01
1.15
1.21
1.38
1.34
Fall
Veg.
2.21
1.85
1.28
1.15
1.03
.887
.787
.798
.935
1.01
1.14
1.19
Unveg.
2.04
1.64
1.05
.918
.802
.674
.581
.599
.754
.842
.961
1.02
                                         101

-------
                Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
                                                           Legend
                                                           A WINiER

                                                           *
                                                          D SUMMER
                                                          • AU1UMN
400   450    500    550    600    650
             Wavelength (nm)
                                                      TOO


Figure  7.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation for shallow waters  of the lower
Chesapeake Bay.  (All  sites combined).
                                  102

-------
large difference between  the mean deep-water  (bay  site)  coefficients  and the
shallow water coefficients possibly due  to  lesser  resuspension  of  particulates
in the deep site.
                                                                                       ~ i
     The mean autumnal values were similar  to those  of  the  sprint  mean                  \
coefficients for the vegetated sites, ranging from about  0.79 m~*  at  570 nm to          \
about 2.2 m"1 at 410 nm and the unvegetated mean from 0.58  m~*  to  2 ra"1  at the
same wavelengtha.

     A significant difference between the mean spectral  attenuation
coefficients for vegetated and unvegetated  sites waa found  for  spring (Fig.
471The mean spring violet-blue (500 nm) unvegetated k(X)  is more than  1
standard deviation higher than the mean  k(X)  for violet-blue light at
vegetated sites (cf. Figs. 8, 9).  Both  shallow water vegetated and
unvegetated means were higher than that  for the deep water  (bay site).   Mean
spring vegetated k(X) ranged from 0.71 m~*  at 570  nm to  1.9 m~* at 410 nm.
Corresponding values for  the unvegetated sites  were  0.84  and 2.5 m~*,
respectively. That ia, violet light of 410  nm waa  reduced 85Z per  meter  at  the          j
average vegetated site and over 92Z per  meter at the average unvegetated site
during spring.  There was little or no mean difference  for  wavelengtha greater
than 550 nm (yellow, orange, red).  The  deep  water station  ranged  from about  1
to 1.5 m'1.

Monthly Mean k(X)

     If one compares the  monthly mean spectral attenuation  for  vegetated sites
(Figs. 10, 11, 12) with that for unvegetated  sites (Figs. 13, 14,  15) the  most
obvious difference to be  found, as discussed  above,  is  the  higher  attenuation
of the shorter wavelengths at the unvegetated sites  during  the  spring of the
year.  Th-» unvegetated sites are characterized by  elevated  attenuation over
the entire spectrum from  May through October,  whereas the vegetated sites  do
not show consistently elevated attenuation  coefficients  over the same time
period.  Attenuation of the violet and blue wavelengths  (400-500 nm)  at  the
vegetated sites increases gradually, reaching the  maximum during September.
Minor peaks occur during  April and July.  The attenuation coefficient for  the
remainder of the spectrum (500-700 nm) also exhibits these  minor peaks but
there is no increase towards the September  maximum.

     There does however appear to be a strong seasonal  pattern  to  the
attenuation coefficient at both vegetated and unvegetated sites, differing
mainly in the timing of commencement of  high  values. The  onset  of  high
attenuation, especially of short wavelengths, appears to  differ from  year  to
year, as can be seen by comparing the March 1982 values  (month  15  on  graphs)
with the March and May 1981 values (Figs. 10, 13).  The  correspondences  at
each type of site between the March  1982 (month 15 on the figures) short
wavelength attenuation coefficients and  those for  the proceeding May  (month 5)
are quite striking.  The  relationship between the  vegetated and unvegetated
sites for the March 1982  attenuation coefficients  is also analagous to their
relationship in May, 1981.  That is, at  the average  vegetated site the mean
violet coefficients (410, 441) for May 1981 and for  March 1982  were both
betv -n about 1.5 and 2.0 m"* whereas those for the  average unvegetated  site
were between 2 and 3 m~l  for both months.
                                     103

-------
        MEAN SPRNG VIOLET-BLUE K for VEGETATED SUES

             3-
         •
         1
         o
                                                        Legend
                                                       A Mean
                                                       x Moon T. t S.D.

                                                       x Mean - 1 S.D.
              400     420     440     460     480
                           Wavelength (nm)
500
Figure 8.  Mean spring 1981 violet-blue  attenuation +_ 1 S. D. at vegetated
sites.
                                  104

-------
        MEAN SPRING VIOLET-BLUE K for NON-VEGETATED SES
         J.  "
         JC
             2-
         o
                                                         Legend

                                                        A Mean
                                                        X Meon + 1 S.D.

                                                        x Mean - 1 S.O.
400    420     440     460      480

             Wavelength (nm)
                                                    500
Figure 9.   Mean spring 1981 violet-blue attenuation ^ 1 S. D. at unvegetated
sites.
                                    105

-------
            2-
                          VIOLET-BLUE
                                                        Legend
                                                       A WL-410
                                                       X

                                                       D Wb-488
                              8    10
                               MONIH
12    14
16
Figure  10.  Mean monthly  violet-blue attenuation at vegetated site*.
                                   106

-------
X
,-  Li-
's
u

I   H

j
<  0.3-
                       GREEN-YELLOW
                                                       Legend
                                                      A WL«6Cf7
                                                      x WL-520
                                                      a WL-540
                                                      • WL-570
                                                      B WL-589
                              8     10
                              MONiH
                                12    14
16
Figure  11.  Mean monthly green-yellow attenuation at vegetated sites.
                                 107

-------
                         ORANGE-RED
          o
                                                       Legend
                         6    3    iO
i4    '.6
Figure 12.  Mean monthly orange-red attenuation at vegetated aites.
                                108

-------
          §a
          C
          .0
          ~c
          6
                          VIOLET-BLUE
                          Legend
                         A WI-H10
                         X WI-441
                         D
8    10
 MONTH
                                         12    14    1b
Figure  13.  Mean monthly  violet-blue attenuation at unvegetated site*.
                                  109

-------
I   '
J
"o
I
~  0.5
                        GREEN-YELLOW
                              8    10
                               MONIH
                                                        Legend
                                                       A Wt-507
                                                       x WL-520
                                                       a WI-640
                                                       • WI-S70
                                                       • Wl-589
                                12    14     16
                                                                         f.
Figure  14.  Mean monthly green-yellow attenuation at unvegetatrd sites,
                                  110

-------
                                            >''/
          JE,
          JC
               1-
o
i
~  0.5 H
                           ORANGE-RED
                           b    8     10
                                 MONIH
                          * 1 -U=-Jon-D«cai, IJ-IS^J
                                                           Legend
                                                          A Wl-felS
                                                          x WL-fe56
                                                          D WU-671
                                                          • WU-694
                                 12    14     16
Figure 15.  Mean monthly orange-red attenuation at  unvegetattd sites.
                                   Ill

-------
     For unvegetated aicea the year 1981 was broken up  into  two  distinct  light
environments with little transition, while in the vegetated  sites  there was  a
shorter high attenuation period with a more gradual transition  from  low to
high values.

     The variability (expressed as _+! standard deviation) of the monthly  mean
attenuation for vegetated and unvegetated sites  is shown  for wavelengths  of
441 run and 671 run in Figures 16, 17, 18 and 19.  These  wavelengths are near
the photosynthetic action peaks for marine green plants (Halldal,  1974).   The
variation in violet attenuation (441 run) is consistently  greater during the
high turbidity season (May through October, 1981) for unvegetated  sites than
for vegetated sites (c.f. Figs. 16, 17).  A comparison  of the variability of
red attenuation between vegetated and unvegetated sites yields much  less
difference.  (The high variability during September for both wavelengths  at
the "average" vegetated site is mathematically due to the high attenuation at
the Vaucluse Shore site, included in the mean, compared  to the relatively low
attenuation at the vegetated western shore sites).  Nonetheless, constancy of
light quality may be of consequence to benthic plants.

     Since May 1981 seems to have been not only a pivotal month  for  the
relative light environment in the unvegetated sites of  the Lower Bay, but is
also the month with the highest observed net seagrass community  productivity
(Murray and Wetzel, 1982) let us look more closely at the radiant  energy
attenuation calculations for that month. The mean vegetated  and  unvegetated
k(X) for May are shown in Fig. 20. The unvegetated mean is significantly
higher at all wavelengths. There is a difference of more  than 1.0  m~* at  410
nm, and a difference of about 1.0 m~l at 441 nm.  The difference decreases to
about 0.5 at 520 nm.  Below 540 nm there is a constant  difference  of less than
0.4 m~*.  A 1.0 m~l difference in attenuation coefficients represents a
relative irradiance reduction of 63Z over a 1.0 m path.   That is,  during  May
approximately 632 less violet light was able to  pass through a meter of water
at the "average" unvegetated site than at the "average" vegetated  site.   Over
a 2.0 meter path the relative reduction would be 882.

Individual sites

     A comparison of the mean May k(X) for each  site is presented  in Fig. 21.
The two definitely unvegetated sites (Mumfort Is. in the  York R. and the  site
in the mouth of the Severn R.) had the highest attenuation at all  wavelengths.
The Severn R. site was especially high below 500 nm.  The mean k(X)  for the
violet wavelengths (410, 441 nm) was between 3.5 and 4.0  m"* for this site.   A
unit of radiant energy would be reduced 97-98Z passing  through a meter of
water with an attenuation coefficient between 3.5 and 4.0 ttT1.   A  reduction  of
greater than 99Z would result from the passage of light through  two  meters of
water with an attenuation coefficient greater than 3.5  m"1.   That  is, there
was essentially no violet light below the surface of the  water at  the Severn
R. site during the average Hay sampling period.Blue light  (488 nm) was  also
greatly attenuated at this site (reduced about 902 per  meter).   Mean
attenuation at the Mumfort Is. site ranged from  a high  of about  3.0  m~^ af 410
nm about 1.5 m~l at 507 nm and no higher than that for  the remainder of the
spectrum.  The red end of the spectrum was even  more attenuated  at the Mumfort
Is. site than in the Severn R.
                                     112

-------
             Unvegetated Sites (Lambdo=441nm)
          1
3-
           §aH
           o
                                                       Legerxi
                                                      A Mean
                                                      x M«on •*- 1 S.O.
                                                      < Mean - 1 S.D.
                              8    10
                               MONIH
                           12    14     16
Figure 16.  Mean monthly variability of attenuation of light  of 441 nm at
unvegetated sites.
                                 113

-------
             Vegetated Sites (Lambda=441nm)
         a

         1  H
                            v/1 L   \
               7
                            Legend
                           A M»on
                           X
                                                 x Mean - 1 S.D
             24
6    8    10    12    14    16
     MONTH
Figure 17.  Mean monthly variability of attenuation of ligbt of 441 ran at
vegetated sites.
                              114

-------
           Unvegetated Sites (Lambda-671nm)
        •*=>
        i.
        .Q
           1-
               Legend
                                                     A Mean
                                                     x Meon r 1 S.D.
                                                     x Mean - 1 S.O
b    8    10
      MQNIH
12    14
                                                 16
                                                                              t
                                                                              i
Figure  18.  Mean monthly variability of attenuation of light of 671 ran at
unvegetated sites.     "~"~"
                                 115

-------
>
*-
' 3-
"""
Attenuation coefl.
0 -• N>
• . i
Vegetated Sites (t_ambda-671nm)
"\
' \
. W
A r\ '/ V .
/ . \ / ^\ ./ \\ x*^
/ /\ v y /^^s V ' \
// \V- 8 10 12 14 16
MOMTri
Figure 19.  Mean monthly variability of attenuation of  light of 671 nc  at
vegetated sites.
                                     116

-------
        Mean May Spectral Attenuation by Vegetation
          i3
enuati
                                                       Legend
                                                      A UNVEGETATED,
400    450    500    550    600
             Wavelength (nm)
                                            650   700
Figure 20.  Mean May 1981  spectral attenuation at unvegetated and vegetated
sites.
                                 117

-------
               Mean Spectral Attenuation by Site
           o
              1H
400   450    500    550    600
              Wavelength (nm)
                                                           begend
                                                           O WtCA.MMCM
                                                           • igDMK.
                                                           * fo>«fo»y.M<>i!ei.t..
                                                650    700

Figure 21.  Mean May 1981 spectral attenuation  at  individual sites.
                                    118

-------
     All Bean May coefficients at the vegetated  site* - Guinea Marsh,  Pour
Point Marsh and Vaucluae - were below about 2 ra~^ except  those for  violet
light at Four Point Marsh.  However, the  attenuation of yellow,  orange and red
light at the Four Point Marsh site was extremely low - less  than 0.5 m  .
This is a reduction of only about 402 per meter.  This site  and the  unvegetated
Severn R. site are located very close to  each other, both in Mobjack Bay and
have a very similar pattern of spectral attenuation but at  different
magnitudes.  Note how the k curves track  each other. The  mean k( X)  for the
unvegetated Severn R. site is consistently about 1 m"1 higher than  that for
the vegetated Four Point Marsh site during May.   Violet attenuation at the
Guinea Marsh and Vaucluae Shore vegetated sites  was between  about 1.5  and
2 m"1.  Attenuation of the rest of their  spectra being between 1 and 1.5 nT1.
The Vaucluse site had the lowest violet-blue mean attenuation during May while
the Four Point Marsh site had the lowest  yellow  to red attenuation; lower  than
even the mean winter values at all other  sites!   Notice that with the
exception of the violet light at Four Point Marsh the mean May attenuation for
all vegetated sites at all wavelengths was less  than about  2 m~l.   Thus, the
extremely low May attenuation of the longer wavelengths at Four  Point  Marsh
may compensate for the high attenuation of the short wavelengths in terms  of
total light energy available for photosynthesis.

     The spectral attenuation at the Allen's Is.  site is  intermediate  to that
of the vegetated and unvegetated sites.   That is interesting because this  site
is intermediate with respect to its vegetation.   It was vegetated in the past,
but lost its bay grasses with the rest of the lower Bay.  However,  it  has  been
successfully transplanted by R. J. Orth and associates and  has some natural
plants coming back (personal communication K. Moore, VIMS).  Since  this site
appears in transition the irradiance measurements taken there have  not been
included in either the "vegetated" or "unvegetated" means reported  herein, but
has been treated separately.

     A comparison of the mean seasonal k( X) at individual sites  (Figs.  22  thru
28) reveals both differences between vegetated (Vaucluse, Guinea, Four Point)
and unvegetated (Mumfort, Severn) sites and reveals individual site
idiosyncracies.  The seasonal means plotted on these graphs  were calculated
fron 1981 and 1982 measurements combined. Therefore "winter" (defined as
Jan.-Mar.) at some sites represents values from  both years.  Since, as
explained earlier, the high turbidity season started in March during 1982  and
in May during 1981, the resulting combined winter mean includes  both high  and
low values at those sites which were monitored both years.

     Mean seasonal spectral attenuation values were at or below  2 m~*  for  all
seasons except summer at the western shore vegetated sites  (Figs. 24,  26).  As
noted previously, attenuation at the red  end of  the spectrum was particularly
low at Four Point Marsh (Fig. 26).  Note  how similar autumn, winter and spring
appear at this site.  Winter and spring mean values were  also less  than 2.0
m~l at the eastern shore vegetated site (Vaucluse Shores, Fig. 27), but autumn
was the most turbid season for this site  as it also was for  the  deep site  on
the Eastern Shore (Bay, Fig. 28).  None of the western shore sites  showed  this
pattern.  The light environment, not surprisingly, appears  to be quite
different in the different masses of water on opposite sides of  the Bay.  With
the exception of fall the mean seasonal attenuation at the deep  site (Fig. 28)
                                      119

-------
              Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
           -<=>
           A
            O
                                                          Legend
                                                         A WM1ER
                                                         x SPRiNG_
                                                         a SUMMER
                                                         • AUIUMN
               400   450   500    550    600
                            Wavelength (nrn)
650    TOO
Figure  22.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation at Mumfort Is. (York  R.).
                                  120

-------
             Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
          .Q
                                                        Legend
                                                       A WINTER
                                                       X SPRING
                                                       a SUMMER
                                                       • AU1UMN
              400    450    500    550    600   650    700
Figure  23.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation  at Allen's  Is. (York R.),
                                  121

-------
            Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
            3'
            a-
             '•
 Legend
A WINIER
X SPRMC_
D SUMMER
• AU1UMN
             400   450    500   550    600    650    700
Figure  24.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation at Guinea Marsh.
                                 122

-------
                                                                                /
               Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
            o
                 \
                     \
                                                  JB--B
 Legend
A WNIE.R
x SPRING
O SUMMER
• AUIUMN
                400    450    500   J>50    600    650    700
Figure  25.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation at  the mouth of the Severn R.
(Mob jack Bay).
                                  123

-------

               Mean Seasonal Spectra! Attenuation
                  \
                     \
                                                    --a
                                                          Legend
                                                         A WMER
                                                         x SPRING
                                                         0 SUMMER
                                                         • AlflUMN
                400   450    500   550    600    650    700
Figure  26.  Mean seasonal spectral  attenuation at Four Point Marsh (mouth  of
Ware R., Mobjack Bay).
                                  124

-------
 ,-/•  :   •  /
''/     S/'
                                          /'
              Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
              o-
                                                          Legend

                                                         A WIN1E.R

                                                         x SPRiNO


                                                         a SUMMER
               400   4bO    bOO    550    600    6bO   700
                                                                                  i
Figure  27.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation at Vaucluse Shores Zostera bed

(Eastern Shore).
                                  125

-------
              Mean Seasonal Spectral Attenuation
           A3^
              2-
           o
           ~o
           1
 Legend
A WINIER	
x SPRING
O SUMMER
• AUOJMN
               400    450    500    550    600   650   700
Figure  28.  Mean seasonal spectral attenuation at the Deep Station (Bay)  at
VaucLuse Shores (Eastern Shore).
                                 126
                                                                             J

-------
was consistently lower  than  the  corresponding  values  at  any  other site.   Note           j
the relative color shift  from  blue  to  red  betveen  spring to  summer at  this
site (the intersection  of  the  2  seasonal curves).   This  shift  also occurs in
modified form at the eastern shore  seagrass  site  (Vaucluse,  Fig.  27).   Here             j
the penetration of blue light  is reduced significantly but  the penetration of           j
red light is not increased.                                                              ;

     The western shore  unvegetated  sites (Mumfort,  Severn,  Figs.  22,  25)  both
had mean spring violet  attenuation  values  between  2 and  3 m~l, definitely
higher than the corresponding  values at any  vegetated site.  Each of  the
seasonal mean curves for  Mumfort Is. (Fig. 22) are  high  compared  to the other
site*.  The autumn and  winter  mean  k(x) for  the Severn R. site are, however,
similar to the corresponding curves  for vegetated  sites.

     The Allen's Is. site  (Fig.  23)  is once  again  difficult  to classify.   Its
mean spring k( X) is  intermediate, summer low,  winter  high and  fall it,  about
average.

     The mean monthly water  column  attenuation for selected  wavelengths at
individual sites ie  presented  in Figs. 29  through  35. The wavelengths
presented in these figures (410, 441,  488, 570, 671,  694 ran) were selected not
only for their biological  relevance  with respect  to photosynthetic action
spectra and in vivo  pigment  absorption peaks,  but  to  outline the  extremes and
means of the full set of  12  wavelengths measured with more clarity and less
confusion than is possible by  showing  the  entire  set  measured. A spline
interpolation was used  to  connect the  discrete measurements.

     A seasonal pattern of turbidity at all  sites  is  most obvious. As
mentioned previously the  high  turbidity at the unvegetated  sites  (Figs. 29,
32) clearly starts in Nay and  continues through October,  during 1981.  This is
especially obvious for  the shorter  wavelengths. The  onset of  high turbidity
appears earlier in 1982,  during  March, with  violet  attenuation approaching or
exceeding 3.0 m ~* at the  unvegetated  sites.   At Guinea  Marsh  (vegetated,  Pig.
31) the violet attenuation increased gradually from a low of about 1.5 m~'  in
March of 1981 to a peak of between  3.5 and 4.1 m~*  during September,  declining
dramatically to winter  levels  in November.  As of  March  1982,  no  increase was
evident.  The attenuation  of  longer  wavelengths at  Gui.tea Marsh peaked sharply
in September and declined  during October to  reach  otherwise  constantly low
values during November.  A similar  pattern of  attenuation for  the longer
wavelengths of light was  found at the  other  western shore vegetated site,  Four
Point Marsh (Fig. 33).   However, May 1981  values were extraordinarily  low (0.5
ro"*) for the red end of the  PAR  at  this site.   Simultaneously, the violet-blue
attenuation during May  was higher than the other  vegetated  sites.  The Allen's
Is. site (Fig. 30) shows  much  less  monthly variation  than any  other western
shore site.

     The eastern shore  vegetated site  at Vaucluse  (Fig.  34)  reached its
maximum short wave attenuation during  October, but  also  peaked in April.   The
minima occurred during  March,  May and  June 1981 and January  1982.  The long
wave attenuation followed  the  same  pattern but with much leas  magnitude.
March, May and June, 1981  were also  the months of  maximum net  productivity for
the benthic Zostera  community  at this  site (Murray &  Weteel, 1982).  The  same
                                      127

-------
           Mean Monthly Attenuation by Waveiengin
             3-

-------
          Mean Monthly Attenuation by Wavelength
             .
           §
           o
           1,
                                  10
                                Month
to
              Legend
             A WL-41Q
             X	

             a w?-£88
             • Wl-570
             X Wlr-671

             * Wb-694
20
                      V-U-.
Figure  30.  Mean monthly attenuation of selected wavelengths at Allen's Is.
(York R.).
                                  129

-------
           Mean  Monthly Attenuation by Wavelength
           D
           3
           o
           'a
                        b        10
                               Month
15
             Legend
             3 Vfc-488

             a WU-670

             B
20
                                                                               <  •
                                                                               i
Figure 31.  Mean monthly attenuation of selected wavelengths at Guinea Marsh,
                                  130

-------
           Mean Monthly Attenuation by Wavelength
            8 2

            O
           '.^
            O
               1-
                                   10
                                 Montn
15
              Legend
             A Wb-410
             a WL-488
             B WU-570
                                                            Wl=694
20
                                    -1t>-=>.una2-Ngf 8
Figure 32.  Mean monthly attenuation of selected wavelengths at the mouth  of
the Severn R. (Mobjack Bay).
                                   131

-------
           Mean Monthly Attenuation by  Wavelength
                                                          Legend
                                                         A WL~*10
                                                         X

                                                         D Wb-488
                                                         • WL-570
                                                         • ^Bse^
                                                         « WL-69*
                                  10     12
                                Montri
14
16
Figure 33.   Mean monthly attenuation of selected wavelengths at Four Point
Marsh (mouth of Ware R., Mobjack  Bay).  Note:  Horizontal axis differs  from
other figures  in thif series.
                                       \
                                   132

-------
         Mean Monthly Attenuation by Wavelength
          §»
          -
          a
            o-
                                :0

                              Month
    Legena

    A Wli-410

    X
                                                     a *u-570
                                                       WL--694
20
Figure 34.  Mean monthly attenuation of  selected wavelengths in the Zostera
bed at Vaucluse Shores.
                                133

-------
          Mean Monthly Attenuation by  Wavelength
coe

K
1
uati
At
  10
Montn
                                           15
                                                         Legend
                                                        A Wl-410
                                                        X Wb-441
                                                        a WL-488 _
                                                        • WL-570
                                                          WL-671
20
Figure  35.  Mean monthly attenuation of selected wavelengths at Deep Station
(Bay) at  Vaucluse Shores.
                                  134

-------
pattern of attenuation, but with  less extreme oscillation  is  apparent  at  the
deep water station (Fig. 35) adjacent to  the Vaucluse  site.

     In summary, attenuation across  the entire  spectrum  at unvegetated sites
appears to begin earlier in the year and  increase at a more rapid  rate than at
vegetated sites.

Relative Potential Benthic Photosynthesis

     Potential benthic production  is determined both by  the light  available
for photosynthesis at the bottom  of  the water column and by the  inherent
photosynthetic response of the plants present.  Limiting our  discussion to
green plants and using published  photosynthetic action spectra,  mean seasonal
attenuation coefficients and incident irradiance measurements we can calculate
the relative potential jghotoaynthetically £torable jradiation, PSR  (Morel,
1978; Smith, 1979).  The results  of  these calculations for spring  are
presented in Figure 36.  Spring was  chosen  for  this example not  only because
it is the season with the greatest difference in attenuation  between vegetated
and unvegetated sites, but because it is  the season of highest net seagrass
community productivity (Murray and Wetzel,  1982; Wetzel  et al.,  1982).

     Curve "a" (Fig. 36) represents  the mean incident  spectral irradiance
during clear spring days at noon.  Notice how the quantum distribution
decreases rapidly below 500 nm. The  estimated total attenuation  coefficients
for both vegetated and unvegetated sites  are shown as  curves  "b".   These
represent the spring spectral attenuation from  just above  the water's  surface
to a depth of 1.0 m for calm, clear  days  around noon.  The attenuation at the
unvegetated sites is higher at all wavelengths  than that at the  vegetated
sites during spring:  especially  for wavelengths less  than 500 nm.  This
difference increases from .23 m ^  at 507  nm to  .51 m"1 at 410 nm.   There  is a
difference between site types of  about  .1 m~* from 570 to  700 nm.

     The resulting estimated benthic irradiance for both vegetated and
unvegetated sites is shown as curves "c".   (Note that  the verticle axis is
less than one-fifth that of the verticle  axis for curve  "a").  Compare these
with curves "a" to ascertain the  dramatic decreases in irradiance  through just
1.0 u of water.  The benthic irradiance at  the  average spring unvegetated site
ranges from 0.21  cm"2^"1 at 410 nm to 2.13 cm~2's~*  at 570  nm.   The
corresponding irradiance for vegetated  sites is .349 and 2.37 respectively.

     The relative photosynthetic  action spectrum for Diva  taeniata, a  typical
shallow water estuarine green algal  specie  is plotted  as curve "d" after Haxo
and Blinks (1950) and HalIda11 (1974).  The photosynthetic pigment complex  of
green algae is very similar to that  of  seagrasses.  The  useable  light  energies
of highest photosynthetic efficiency fall between 400-500  nm  and between  650
and t>80 nm.

     The potential PSR for the average  spring vegetated  and unvegetated site
is presented as curve "e".  This  is  simply  the  normalized  (0-100)  product of
curves "c" and "d".  The resulting potential PSR curve is  a  function therefore
of incident radiation, total attenuation  and the inherent  spectral efficiency
of "green marine plant" photosynthesis.   This PSR spectral distribution
                                     135

                                                                                     A

-------
   10 -i
«o
UJ
u
z
<
o
oc
cc
8-
u  6-
    4 -1
       — — — - Unvegetated
                                                400
                                                       1
                                                      500
      600

X  Inm)
700
 Figure 36.  Relative  potential  spring  PSR  for vegetated  and unvegetated  sites.
 Solid lines represent vegetated areas, dashed lines represent unvegetated.
 (a) Mean  spring  surface  irradiance  at  noon on a  clear day, (b) total
 attenuation,  (c)  benthic  irradiance  at  1.0 m, (d)  relative photosynthetic
 action spectrum,  (e)  relative potential  photosynthetically storable radiation
 (PSR).
                                      136

-------
includes two peaks; one broadly centered  about  490  nm  in  the  blue  end  and the
other extending from about 590 to about 690  nm.  The blue  peak  has  been
shifted from about 440 nm in  the action spectrum to about  490 nm  in the  PSR
due to the combined effects of the high attenuation of violet and  the  low
original violet insolation. Much of  the difference  between the  mean vegetated
and mean unvegetated PSR curves lies within  the blue peak.  The unvegetated
blue peak is quite insubstantial (below 50)  whereas the vegetated  peak is from
12 to 16 relative units higher.  In  a marginal  light environment  this
difference in potential atorable radiant  energy may be quite  important.   In
the red peak region the difference between the  two  curves  is  much  lower  - from
5 to 8 units between 590 and  670 nm.

                                  DISCUSSION

     In the lower Chesapeake  Bay the  light available to benthic plants may not
include great quantities of energy at the wavelengths  which can be  most
efficiently used by those plants.  The greatest loss of potential  energy
appears to be in regions of the spectrum most significant  for photosynthesis.
Whether the difference in light quality between vegetated  and unvegetated
sites ie causal, and the direction of that causality cannot be  determined by
the work reported here.  But,  there  does  appear to  be  a negative correlation
between light quality and the  presence of seagrasses.   A consideration of the
direction of the causality may be irrelevant and analagous to asking the
question, which came first, the chicken or the  egg? That  is, does  the
baffling effect of seagrasses  cause  settling of the fine suspended  material
thus reducing the scattering  and absorption  (lowering  attenuation)  and
allowing more light energy to reach  the benthos?  Or,  does a  water  body  with
relatively little suspended material provide a  light environment suitable for
seagrasses to survive, grow and thus baffle  the water  and  maintain  water
clarity so light can continue  to reach the benthos  —  etc.?

     Yes—to both.  Ecosystems are comprised of dynamically interconnected
biological and physical components which  interact materially  and
energetically.  The morphogenesis of ar ecosystem from simple pioneer
beginnings to a mature dynamically stable climax stage involves a  continual
reciprocal induction process  between  its  physical and  biological parts.   This
is achieved through sensitive  feedback mechanisms.  A  mature  ecosystem is a
homeostatic entity capable of internal adjustment to a range  of external
conditions - within limits.

     Let's define the benthic  seagrass community and its overlaying water
column an ecosystem.  The water clarity is affected by the baffling effect of
the plants (Ginsburg and Lowenstain,  1958; Scoffin,  1970; Wanless,  1981;
Boynton and Heck, 1982) and the plants are certainly affected by  the water
clarity.  A minimal water clarity is necessary  for  a seedling of  seagrass to
successfully colonize a suitable barren substrate and  to grow vegetatively to
some minimal size necessary to provide the baffling necessary to  induce
settling (Boynton and Heck's  (1982)  "critical bed size") and  trapping  of
enough of the fine particles  to clear the water column to  maintain  a tolerable
light environment for continued growth.   If  during  the early  seedling  stage
the water clarity is insufficient than the ecosystem will  not succeed  to the
                                     137

-------
self regulatory, homeostatic stage and a seagrass community will not  be
established.

     A model of a seagrass ecosystem including the water column is shown  in
Figure 37 as an aid to the conceptualization of the sensitive  feedback
relationship between the seagrass community and water clarity.  Of particular
interest is the relationship between critical bed size and sedimentary
baffling and attenuation.

     Due to the dynamic nature of the littoral zone and coastline, normal
variations in physical parameters may often exceed an established seagrass
community's ability to adjust and survive on a local scale.  Rapid
recolonizing - both vegetatively and sexually (via seeds) would be expected _i_f
water clarity permits, but, if—due to nutrient enrichment and subsequent
plankton blooms or particle runoff, or both—the light environment becomes
unsuitable for the re-establishment of a new seagrass community, than the net
seagrass ecosystem size may dimish despite survival of the established beds
not affected by normal local disturbances.  That is, since there appears  to be
thresholds below which the critical feedback between biological and physical
parameters of the system cannot be established (critical bed size and a
minimal light environment) — replacement of seagrass communities lost due to
normal processes may be impossible during periods of reduced water quclity.

     The hiotorical pattern of increasing nutrient enrichment of the
Chesapeake Bay from agricultural runoff and municipal sources and its presumed
contribution to excess planktonic productivity (Heinle et al,  1980) coupled
with the particulate load associated with runoff may have altered the water
clarity enough to account for the decline in submerged aquatic vegetation via
the mechanism discussed above.  Our measurements of spectral irradiance and
attenuation in the littoral zone of the lower Chesapeake would certainly  lead
us to believe that there isn't much light to spare—especially at the
frequencies most efficiently used by green plants for photosynthesis.
                                     138

-------
                                                                    REFLECTED
                                                                         a
                                                                       BACK-
                                                                     SCATTERED
                               CRITICAL  BED  SIZE
Figure 37.  Conceptual model  of  critical feedback between biological and
physical components of the  seagrass  ecosystem.  (Symbols after Odum, 1983),
                                     139

-------
                                  CONCLUSIONS                                           <
                                                                                        i
1.   A seasonal pattern of spectral attenuation occurs in the shallow waters  of          I
    the Lower Chesapeake Bay.  Summer has the highest, spring and  fall  are
    intermediate and winter has the lowest.

2.   The onset of high attenuation differs from year to year.

3.   The seasonal pattern of attenuation differs between vegetated  and                   :
    unvegetated sites.  The transition from low winter attenuation to high
    summer attenuation is more abrupt at unvegetated sites.  There is a
    shorter high attenuation- season at vegetated sites.

A.   There is a significantly greater attenuation of violet light in
    unvegetated sites during spring, especially during May 1981 and March
    1982.  During May, 1981, 632 less /iolet light was able to pass through  a
    meter of water at the average unvegetated site than at the average
    vegetated site; 882 less through 2.0 meters.  (A difference of 1.0 m~l at
        nm).
5.  The variability of violet attenuation was greater at unvegetated sites
    during the high turbidity seasons.                                                  i

6.  The pattern and magnitude of spectral attenuation differed on opposite              ' }
    sides of the Bay.                                                                   j ;
                                                                                        i .
7.  There is a reduction of potential photosynthetically storable radiation             j '.
    (PSR) at unvegetated sites.  Less light is available at those wavelengths           H
    most efficiently used by green marine plants for photosynthesis.                    • ;

8.  A critical feedback between the biological and physical components of
    the seagrass/water column ecosystem must be established if the system is
    to maintain homeostasis.
                                     140
                                                                                      i

                                                                                      A

-------
                                 LITERATURE CITED

Baker, K. S. and R. C. Smith.  1980.  quasi-inherent characteristics of  the
     diffuse attenuation coeificient  for  irradiance.   In,  S. Q.  Duntley,  (ed.)
     Ocean Optics VI. pp. 60-63, Proc. Soc. Photo-optical  Instrumentation
     Engineers, Vol. 208.

Booth, C. R. and P. Dunstan.   1979.   Diver-operable multiwavelength
     radiometer.  In, Measurements of Optical Radiations.  Soc.  Photo-optical
     Instrumentation Engineers 196:33-39.

Boynton, W. R. and K. L. Heck, Jr.  1982.  Ecological  role and  value of
     submerged macrophyte communities:  A scientific summary.   In, E. C.
     Macalaster, D. A. Barker  and M.  Kasper, (eds.), Chesapeake Bay Program
     Technical Studies:  A Synthesis, U.  S. Environmental  Protection Agency,
     Washington, D.C.  pp. 428-502.

Burt, W. V.  1958.  Selective  transmission of light in tropical  Pacific
     waters.  Deep-Sea Res.  5:51-61.

Champ, M. A., G. A. Gould, III, W. E. Bozzo, S. G. Ackleson  and K. C. Vierra.
     1980.  Characterization of light extinction and attenuation in Chesapeake
     Bay, August,  1977.  In, V. S. Kennedy, (ed.), Estuarine Perspectives,
     Academic Press, Inc., N.  Y.  pp. 263-277.

Clarke, G. L. and H. R. James.  1939.  Laboratory analysis of the selective
     absorption of light by seawater.  J.  Optical Soc.  Am.   29:43-55.

Clarke, G. L. and G. C. Ewing.  1974.  Remote spectroscopy of the sea  for                 j
     biological production studies.   In,  N. G.  Jerlov  and  E. Steeman Nielsen
     (eds.), Optical Aspects of Oceanography, Academic Press, N.  Y.  pp.
     389-413.

Ginsburg, R. N. and H. A. Lowenstam.  1958.  The influence of marine bottom
     communities on the depositional  environment of sediments.   J. Geol.
     66:310-318.

Govindjee and Govindjee.   1975.  Bioent>rgatic8  of Photosynthesis.  Academic
     Press, N. Y.

Halldal, P.  1974.  Light and  photosynthesis of different  marine algal groups.
     In, N. G. Jerlov and E. Steeman  Nielsen, (eds.) Optical Aspects of
     Oceanography pp. 343-360, Academic Press,  N. Y.

Haxo, F. T. and L. R. Blinks.  1950.  Photosynthetic action  spectra of marine
     algae.  J. Gen. Physioi.  33(3):389-422.
                                     141

-------
Heinle, D. R., C. F. D'Elia, J. L. Taft, J.  S. Wilson,  M.  Cole-Jones,  A.  B.
     Caplins and L. E. Cronin.  1980.  Historical  review  of  water  quality and
     climatic data  from Chesapeake Bay with  emphasis  on effects  on enrichment.
     Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Chesapeake  Bay Program.
     Chesapeake Research Consortium,  Inc.  Pub.  No. 84.   Univ. MD.  Center for
     Environmental  and Estuarine Studies No. 80-15 CBL.                                   i
                                                                                          i
Hurlburt, E. A.  1945.  Optics  of distilled  and  natural water.   J.  Optical               !
     Soc. Amer.  35:689-705.

Inada, K.  1976.  Action spectra for  photosynthesis in  higher  plants.   Plant
     Cell Physiol.  17:355-365.

James, H. R. and E. A. Birge.   1938.  A  laboratory study  of  the  absorption of
     light by lake  waters.  Trans. Wise. Acad. Sci.   31:154  ->p.

Jerlov, N. G.   1976.  Marine Optics.  Elsevier Oceanography  Series Vol.  14,
     Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., N. Y.   231 pp.

Kalle, K.  1966.  The problem of rhe  Gelbstoff in  the Sea.   Oceanogr.  Mar.
     Biol. Annu. Rev.  4:91-104.

Levring, T.  1947.  Submarine daylight and the photosynthesis  of marine  algae.
     GHteborgs Vetensk Samh. Handl.,  IV  Ser., B, 5/6:1-89.

Levring, T.  1966.  Submarine light and  algal shore zonation.   In,  R.                     i
     Bainbridge, G. C. Evans, and 0.  Rackham, (eds.), Light  as an  Ecological              j
     Factor, pp. 305-318.   British Ecol. Soc. Symp. Vol.  No. to,  Blackwell Sci.          ,  j
     Pubs. Ltd., Oxford, G. B.                                                            '

Morel, A.  1978.  Available, useable  and stored  radiant energy  in  relation to
     marine photosynthesis.  Deep-Sea Research 25:673-688.

Murray, L. and R. L. Wetzel.  1982.   Compartmental studies of  community  oxygen
     metabolism.  In, R. L. Wetzel (ed.) Structural and Functional Aspects of
     the Ecology of Submerged Aquatic Macrophyte Communities  in  the Lower
     Chesapeake Bay Grant  Nos.  R6U5974 and XUU3245-01,  U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Odum,  H. T.  19b3.  Systems Ecology:  An Introduction.  John Wiley & Sons,
     N.Y., 644 pp.

Orth,  R. J., K. A.  Moore and li. H. Gordon.  1979.  Distribution  and abundance
     of submerged aquatic  vegetation  in  the  lower  Chesapeake  Bay.   E.P.A.
     Report No. 600/8-79 -029/SAVl.

Pierce, J. W., D. L. Correll, M. A. Faust, W. H. Klein  and B.  Goldberg.   1981.
     Spectral quality of underwater light  in a turbid estuary,  Rhode River,
     MD, U.S.A. Unpub. manuscript.
                                     142

-------
Prieur, L. and S. Sathyendranath.   1981.  An  optical  classification  of  coaetal
     and oceanic waters based on the specific  absorption  curves  of
     phytoplankton pigments dissolved  organic  water,  and  other particulate
     materials.  Limnol Oceanogr 26:671-669.

Scoffin, T. P.   1970.  The trapping and binding  of  subtidal  carbonate
     sediments by marine vegetation in Bimini  Lagoon,  Bahamas.   J. Sed.
     Petrol.  40:249-273.

Seliger, H. H. and M. E. Loftus.   1974.  Growth  and dissipation  of
     phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay.  II. A  statistical  analysis of
     phytoplankton standing crops  in the Rhode and West Rivers and adjacent
     section of  the Chesapeake Bay.  Chesapeake  Sci.  15:185-204.

Smith, R. C.  1979.  Bio-Optics.   In,  S. Q. Duntley,  (ed.) Ocean Optics VI,
     pp. 47-53,  Proc. Soc. Photo-Optical Instrumentation  Engineers,  Vol.  208.

Wanless, H. R.   1981.  Fining - upwards sedirentary sequences generated in
     seagrass beds.  J. Sep. Petrol.   51(2):445-454.

Wetzel, R. L., R. F. van Tine and  P. A. Penhale.  1981.   Light and submerged
     microphyte  communities in the Chesapeake  Bay:  A scientific summary.
     Special Report No. 260 in Applied Marine  Science and Ocean  Engineering,
     Virginia Institute of Marine  Science, Gloucester Point, VA.  54 pp.

Wetzel, R. L., L. Murray, R. F. van Tine and  P.  A.  Penhale.  1982.
     Photosynthesis, light response and metabolism  of submerged  uacrophyte
     communities in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.  In,  R. L.  Wetzel  (ed.)
     Structural  and Functional Aspects of th  Ecology  of Submerged Aquatic
     Macrophyte  Communities in the Lower Chesapeake Bay,  Vol I.  Final  Draft
     Report Grant No. R805974 and  X003245-01  U.S. Environmental  Protection
     Agency, Washington, D.C.

Yentsch, C. S.   1960.  The influence of phytoplankton pigments on the colour
     of the sea  water.  Deep-Sea Res.  7:1-9.

Zschiele, F. P.  and C. L. Comar.   1941.  Influence  of preparative procedure  on
     the purity  of chlorophyll components as  shown  by absorption spectra.
     Botan. Gazette 102:463-481.

Zscheile, F. P., J. W. White, Jr., B.  W. Beadle,  and  J. R. Roach.  1942.  The
     preparation and absorption spectra of  five  pure  carotenoid  pigments.
     Plant Physiol 17:331-346.
                                      143

-------
                                   Chapter 4
           SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION AND ATTENUATION OF UNDERWATER LIGHT
                IN A TROPICAL MANGROVE CREEK AND SEAGRASS BED,
       LACUNA DE TERMINOS, CAMPECHE, MEXICO:  A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.1'2
                        R. F. van Tine and R. L. Wetzel
                                                                                        i
                     Virginia Institute of Marine Science                               j
                           School of Marine Science
                          College of William and Mary
                          Gloucester Point, VA  23062
1.  This research was supported in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Grants R805975 and X003245-01 the College
    of William and Mary, Virginia Institute ot Marine Science, Department of
    Wetlands Ecology.

2.  Contribution no.    , the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester
    Point, VA  23062.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     We want to extend thanks  to  all  our Mexican  colleagues  who  accepted  and
worked closely witn our contingent of fourteen scientists, especially   Ramiro
Roman, Director of the Centro  de  Ciencias  del Mar y  Limnologia  (UNAM)   who
provided us  lodging, space,  logistical  support and a friendly atmosphere  anr?
Drs. Alejandro Yanez and Vivianne Solis of the Universidad National  Autoroma
de Mexico (UNAM)  for their many contributions.

     Thanks  also  to our fearle-s  leader, Dr. J. W. Day,  Jr.  for  organizing  the
expedition,  and to Chris Madden and Linda  Deegan  for their help  in  the  field.

     We also thank Ms. Carole  Knox and  Nancy White for  their expert
secretarial  services and Ms. Melissa  van Tine for her editorial  assistance.
                                      145

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION

     There has been a paucity of systematic experimental studies of spectral
irradiance in marine environments (Jerlov  1976) and even fewer  studies have
been reported for estuarine waters (Wetzel et al. 1981; Champ et al.  1980;
Pierce et al. 1981).  None, to our knowledge, exist for La gun a  de Terminos
except a qualitative description of turbidity patterns (Day and
Yanez-Arancibia 1980), depicting an east to west gradient corresponding with
the predominate wind-driven circulation of lagoon water (Gierlof f-Emden 1977).

     The present work to describe the  light environment, was designed as  part
of a Winter 1981 multi-disciplinary, U.S. -Mexican ecosystem study of  the
lagoonal seagrass beds.  Wetzel et al. (1982) provide a description of the
study site, Estero Pargo (see Fig. 1).  Estero Pargo Creek drains an  extensive
mangrove swamp dominated by Rhizophora mangle, and the mouth opens on an
extensive seagrass bed dominated by Thalassia testudinum.

                                    METHODS

     In situ measurements of downwelling 2 U spectral irradiance were made as
quanta iun~^ cm"* s~* at 12 biologically significant wavelengths ^ 5 run (410,
441, 488, 507, 520, 570, 589, 625, 656, 671, 694) using a Biospherical Model
MER-1000 submersible spectroradiometer (Booth and Duns tan 1979) that had
recently been calibrated using U.S. Bureau of Standards lamps.  Each
measurement taken was the mean of 250  individual scans made over a
several-second interval to eliminate wave-crest refraction distortions,
effects of non-random distribution of  particles in the water column, and
nonunifonn sky conditions.  Measurements were made at the mouth of Estero
Pargo Creek over a Thalassia testudinum bed, at a site approximately  1 km up
the creek off the U.N.A.M. Centro de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia dock and at
an intermediate midstream site.  Measurements at the Thalassia  site were made
periodically throughout the daylight hours during 3 days coinciding with other
studies (Wetzel et al. 1982).  Measured depths ranged from .75  to 1.1 m.  The
diffuse vertical attenuation coefficient (k) was assumed to be  an exponential
function of depth (Jerlov 1976) and calculated for each wavelength as:
                                    m-ln (g,/E0)
where Er is downwelling  irradiance at depth z and Eo is insolation just above
the water surface.

                                    RESULTS

     The downwelling spectral  irradiance  for noon and  1:00 p.m., both at  the
surface (incident  irradiance)  and at a depth of just less than a meter
(benthic irradiance) are presented in Fig. 2 along with their corresponding
attenuation coefficients,  for  a clear sky day at the Thalassia site.  The noon

-------
Figure 1.  Map of Study Site
                                     147

-------
                           r          INCIDENT
                          /           IRRAOIANCE
                                         BENTHIC
                                        IRRADIANCE
         400
500
600
700
                                   A tnm)
Figure 2.  Downwelling spectral irradiance  and  spectral attenuation
coefficients over a Thalassi" testudinum  bed off the mouth of Estero Pargo
Creek on a clear day.  (A) 1200 C.S.T., 10-15 knot sw wind, z - .88 m, (B)
1300 C.S.T., Calm, z " .85 m.  Shaded  area  represents difference in
attenuation which may be due to wind  driven resuspension.  (Each point is the
mean of 250 scans).
                                    148

-------
   TABLE I
Daily Mean k
Color
Violet
Blue
Green
Yellow
Orange
Red


(run)
410
441
488
507
520
540
570
589
625
656
671
694
PAR
(400-700)
n
z(m)
t
Feb. 6
3.64
3.02
2.22
2.05
1.90
1.75
1.63
1.66
1.86
1.94
2.06
2.11
2.01
2250
.98-1.1
1430-1730
Feb. 8
3.48
2.77
1.92
1.76
1.66
1.54
1.40
1.40
1.52
1.53
1.58
1.65
1.74
1250
.85-. 91
1115-1400
Feb. 10
5.27
4.26
2.99
2.74
2.55
2.34
2.10
2.08
2.26
2.25
2.34
2.40
2.54
500
.76
1115-1200
Grand Mean
4.13
3.35
2.38
2.18
2.04
1.87
1.71
1.71
1.88
1.91
1.99
2.05
2.10
400
.76-1.1
1115-1730
     149

-------
measurement (A) was made during a  10-15 knot  s.w. wind  but  an  hour  later (B)
the wind had diminished.  There is a sharp attenuation  of blue  and  violet
light below about 500 nm, while the  lowest attenuation  occurs  in  the  yellow
region between 550-600 nm.  As indicated, although  little appreciable
difference exists between the two  insolation  curves,  there  is  a considerable
increase in attenuation, across the  spectrum, between the windy noon  and the
calm 1:00 p.m. values (shaded area of Fig. 2).  Noontime PAR
(Photosynthetically Available Radiation)  insolation  is  about 23 x 1016
quanta-cm"2^'!, while benthic PAR irradiance is only 3-6 x
     Mean daily spectral attenuation coefficients are  shown  in Table  I  for
three of five days at the Thalassia site off the mouth of  the creek.
Attenuation per meter of the shortest wavelengths ranged from a mean  daily  low
of 3.64 to a high of 5.27, representing the highest values observed at  the
site.  The mid-band yellow light  (570-590) was  least attenuated,  ranging  from
1.40 m~l to 2.10 m~l.  The grand  weekly mean attenuation coefficients
represent the average of 4,000 scans.  Climatic conditions ranged  from  windy
and cloudy to clear and calm and  covered the time period,  1115 to  1730  C.S.T.
Depths ranged from .76 to 1.1 m.  The grand mean (Fig. 3-(l), curve C)  should
well characterize spectral attenuation at this  site during the "El Norte"
season, as the 5-day measurement  period was an  interim between two such storm
events.

     Comparison of spectral attenuation coefficients along a  1 km upstream
transect (Fig. 3-(D) revealed a  dramatic decrease of  violet and  blue light
(400-500 nm).  Attenuation was higher at all wavelengths upstream  (A) than  at
the mouth (C), the difference assymptotically increasing to  almost 3.0  m"1  at
the violet end of the spectrum and approaching  zero in the red region (650-700
nm).  Midstream attenuation (B) vas intermediate between the extremes.

                                  DISCUSSION

     As light passes through a body of water, its energy content  and  spectral
quality are changed by absorption and scattering due to the  water  itself,
dissolved substances, and suspended particles.  The combined effect of  these
processes is termed attenuation.  Backscattering, the  change in direction of
light propagation caused by diffraction, refraction, and reflection,  is
wavelength dependent in an irregular and complex manner.   Scattering  is of
less importance in determining attenuation- in shallow  water  since  usually no
more than 0.5Z of the incident irradiance is back-scattered  out of the  medium
(Clark and Ewing 1974).  Lateral  and forward scattering increase  the  path of
light thereby exposing it to more absorption.   The resulting absorption the
thermodynamically irreversible process of photon conversion  into  thermal,
kinetic, or chemical energy, e.g. photosynthesis), accounts  for most  of the
apparent attenuation observed in  natural bodies of water.

     Much of the attenuation of long wavelengths is due to water  itself (James
and Birge 1938); the effect of sea salts is insignificant  (cf., Clarke  and
James 1939).  The energy of blue  and red wavelengths is selectively absorbed
by particles (Burt 1958; Prieur and Sathyendranath 1981).  The shorter
wavelengths also are strongly attenuated by dissolved  organic material  and
                                      150

-------
                       6-
                       5-
                  '•   4
                       3
                   o
                   O
                   O
                       2H
                                                      (I)
                   ui
                   _i
                   o
                   H   2
                   oc
                        I -
                                                     (2)
                         400
500
 I
600
700
                                         A (nm)
Figure 3.  (1) Comparison of diffuse downwelling spectral attenuation
coefficients at three sites in Estero Pargo Creek.  (A) Upstream off  the
U.K. A.M. dock (B) midstream, (C) off the nouth in a Thalassia bed.  Data for
curves A and 3 represent the mean of 250 scans.  Curve C represents the mean
of 4000 scans taken during 3 days.  (2) The difference in downwelling spectral
attenuation coefficient between the upstream site and the mouth of  Estero
Pargo Creek.  The curve represents the arithmetic difference between  curves A
and C, Fig. 3-(l).
                                    151

-------
complexes of this material, or Gelbstoff  ("yellow  substance"),  the  collective
name given these complexes by Kalle  (1966).  Gelbstoff  is  formed  from
carbohydrates produced by the decomposition  of  organic  matter.  At  Estero
Pargo much potential organic material is  provided  in  the wet  season by
mangrove litter fall, which ranges from about 1  to 4  gm'tn~2*day and takes
several months to decompose (Day and Yanez-Arancibia  1980).   Further,
absorption in the blue and red regions of  the spectrum  by  chlorophyll-bearing
phytoplankton also contributes to the total  spectral  attenuation  that
characterizes a specific body of water.

     Figure 4 is a schematic representation  of  spectral energy  flow through  a
marine environment.  The relative proportions of the  various  constituents
discussed above determine the ultimate light quality  and light  quantity
available to power photosynthetic reactions.  The  diagram  uses  the  typical
noon clear sky irradiance distributions measured above  and below  water at the
Estero Pargo seagrass site.  Typical curves  of  spectral absorption  due to
dissolved organic matter (including  Gelbstoff), non-green  particulate matter,
chlorophyll and pure seawater are shown impinging  on  the path of  light from
surface to bottom.  Rain and wind ("Nortes") cause runoff  with  increased
dissolved organics and resuspension  of particulate matter  and benthic
chlorophyll-bearing microalgae, thus increasing  particle scattering,
absorption and consequently attenuation.   The specific  spectral energy
distribution at a depth thus depends on both the physical  and biological
characteristics of the water column  and   the forcing  functions  impringing on
the system.

     In Estero Pargo Creek the dominating  influence se^ras  to  be from dissolved
organics*  If the spectral attenuation coefficients for the mouth of the  creek
are subtracted from those at the upstream  site  (curve A -  curve B,  Figure
3-(D), the resultant curve (Fig. 3-(2))  may represent  the attenuation due
solely to the constituents ui the water column  present  upstream but not
downstream.  If one compares the resultant curve with the  specific  absorption
curves in Figure 4 it can be seen that it  matches  the shape of  the  dissolved
organic curve very closely.  The extreme  attenuation  of the short wavelengths
decreases downstream as the diluting effect  of  the waters  from  the  lagoon
become more apparent.  The creek waters no doubt affect the light environment
in the grassbed at its mouth, contributing to the  high  violet-blue
attenuation.

     An example of the effects of resuspension  caused by wind can be seen in
Figure 2.  The shaded area of the figure  represents the decreased attenuation
corresponding to a decrease in wind  from  10-15  knots  to calm  during a  1 hour
interval.  Both sets of measurements were  taken  during  a clear  sky.  Notice
that although the incident irradiances at  the mid-spectral region (550-625 nm)
are almost identical, the attenuation coefficients and  benthic  irradiances
differ significantly.  This is probably due  to  resuspended particulate matter
and benthic micro-algae.

                                     SUMMARY

     Laguna de Terminos is a relatively large tropical  estuary  (  2500 km2)
that supports one of the most extensive nearshore  fisheries in  the  Gulf of
                                     152

-------
            INCLUDES
            BACKSCATTER
            AND REFLECTANCE
Figure 4.  Schematic representation of spectral attenuation  through an
estuarine water column.  (Q » quanta'nm"'*cm~2*s~*;  X • wavelength, 400-700
nm; k * specific absorption coefficients, m~^; numbers for irradiance are PAR
integrals, quanta'PAR'cm~2*s~l.  Energy circuit language after Odum 1972;
specific absorption curves redrawn  from Prieur and Sathyendranath, 1981).
                                     153

-------
Mexico.  In part, Che support  is provided  by  the  extensive  seagrass  beds
(Thaiassia testudinum) occupying the shallower  lagoon  areas.   As  part  of  a
joint U.S.-Mexico study of  these vegetated  communities, we  present our
preliminary analysis of submarine  light quality and  quantity  and  several
factors possibly controlling  light energy  distribution in this estuarine
environment.

     At the Estero Pargo  study  site, which  represents  an area of  seagrassee
that are probably light-stressed (Wetzel et al. 1982),  there  is a significant
attenuation (2  to 4 oTM  of the photosynthetically  important  short
wavelengths, 400-500 run.   Incident noon PAR irradiance was  about  23  x  10^
         -»9    I                                               f*         — 9
quanta cm   a"1 and benthic irradiance (z»im) was 3  to 6 x  10° quanta  cm"**
s~l.  In the adjacent roangro?e  swamp channel  (Estero Pargo  Creek) there is
extreme blue-violet attention  which  is probably due  to dissolved  organics
originating from mangrove litter fall and  decomposition.

    At the Thaiassia study  site, wind events, even  relatively mild conditions
(10-15 kts), effect both  light  quality and  quantity  reaching  the  plant canopy.
Since the greatest attenuations occurred  in a spectral region (400-525 ran)
which is extremelv imponant  for absocpf >n bv  chlorophylls and accessory
pigments in hicher plants,  ttv  observed benthic irradiance  distribution has
significant »mpi '.cations  fr>r  soagi iSs r^rnmnni ty productivity.
                                                                                        !1
                                     lr.4
                                                                                     A

-------
                                  LITERATURE CITED

Booth, C. R. and P. Du»tan.   1979.   Diver-operable mult iwave length radiometer.
     In, Measurements of Optical  Radiations.   Soc. Photo-optical
     Instrumentation Engineers,  196:33-39.

Burt, W. V.  1958.  Selective  transmission  of  light in tropical Pacific
     waters.  Deep-Sea Res.  5:51-61.

Champ, M. A., G. A. Could,  III,  W.  E.  Bozzo,  S.  G. Ackleson, and K. C. Yierra,
     1960.  Characterization  of  light  extinction and attenuation in Chesapeake
     Bay, August,  1977.   In,  V.  S.  Kennedy  (ed), Estuarine Perspectives,
     Academic Press, Inc.,  N.Y.   pp.  263-277.

Clark, G. L. and H. H. Jame.-.   19.T*.   Laboratory analysis of the selective
     absorption of  light  by seawater.   J. Opt.  Soc. Am. *9:43-55.

Clark, G. L. and G. C. Owing.   l^7i.   Hemcte spectroscopy of the sea for
     biological production  studies.  In.  N. G.  Jerlov and E. S Iceman-Nielsen ,
     (eds.), Optical Aspects  of  Oceanography.   Academic Press, N.Y.  pp.
     389-413.

Day, J. W., Jr. and A. Yinez-Arancibia.  1980.   Coupling of physical and
     biological processes  in  the  Laguna dj  Terminos, Campeche, Mexico.
     Unpublished manuscript.

Gier lof f-Emden, H. G.   1977.   Lac/ina de Terminos and Cnmpeche Bay, Gulf of
     Mexico:  Water mass  interaction and  l.igoonal-oceanic visibility due to
     sedment  luden waters.  In,  Ivaltor lie  Geruyter (ed.), Ornital Hptnote
     Sensing of Cog s tat and 0 ffshore Environments, A Maunal of Interpretation .
     pp.  77-89, BerTiru

James, H. R. an»! E. A.  Birge.   19JM.   A laboratory study of the absorption of
            by  lake  waters.   Trans.  Wisconsin Acad. Sc i . 11: 1^4 pp.
Jerlov, N. G.   l^/h.   la r IIP  Qp_t i "s .   F ispvier (-ceancgr iphv Series, Vol. t<*,
     Elsevier  Sciencitic  Publ.  Co., N.  Y.   2'U pp.

Kaile, K.   !9f>f>.   Thf  prt)t)l.-m of  Golhsioff in the sea.  Ocoanogr. Mar. Biol.
     Rev. 4:91-10^.
Odum, H.  T.   19/2.   An  energy curcuit Idn^ua^e lot ecological and social
     systems:   Its  physical  basis.  lit,  13.  .. I'.jilt'i1. (od.), Systems
     and  Simulation!-  in EcnI»Ky,  Voi. II.   AcJ(Un«ic Press, N.Y.

-------
Pierce, J. W.,  D. L. Correll, M. A. Faust, W. H. Klein, and B. Gilbert.   1981.
     Spectral quality of underwater light in a turbid estuary, Rhode River,
     Maryland,  U.S.A.  Unpublished manuscript.

Prieur, L. and S. Sathyendranath.  1981.  An optical classification of coastal
     and oceanic waters based on the specific special absorption curves  of
     phytoplankton pigments,  dissolved organic matter, and other particulate
     materials.  Limnol. Oceanogr.  26:671-o89.

Wetzel, R. L.,  R. F. van Tine anl P. A. Penhale.  1981.  Light and submerged
     macrophyte communities in the Chesapeake Bay:  a scientific summary.
     Special Report No. 260 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering,
     Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA., U.S.A.  58
     pp.

Wetzel, R. L., L. Murray, R. F. van Tine, .T. W. Day, Jr. and C. J. Madden.
     1982.   Preliminary studies or community metabolism in a tropical seagraas
     ecosvstem:  Laguna de Terminos, Mexico.  In, R. L. Wetzel (ed.)
     Structural and functional Aspects of the Ecology of Submerged Aquatic
     Macrophyto Communities in the Lower Chesapeake Bay, vol.  I.  Final Report
     Grants  #8803974 submitted Lo the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Wash.,  U.C.
                                      ISh
                                                                                    J

-------

-------