I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 903/9-80-004
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                            METHOD OF STANDARD ADDITIONS

                              AND EFFECTS OF DILUTION



                                   May 1980
                     Annapolis Field Office
                         Region III
                U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  EPA Report Collection
Information Resource Center
   US EPA Region 3
 Philadelphia, PA 19107

-------
Method of Standard Additions
   and Effects of Dilution
I
I
I
I
I
•                                           May 1980
I
I
I
£                                      Joseph Lee Slayton
                                         E.  Ramona Trovato
I
I
                                      Annapolis Field Office
I                                          Region III
                               U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency

I
I
I
I

-------
I

I
                   The method of  standard  additions  is useful when  the matrices
P             of standards  and  samples differ  significantly.  The method  of  additions
Mm             may involve additions  of small quantities of the analyte to the  sample
               with no significant dilution of  the  sample  or cases which involve
•             significant sample  dilution.  In general, a plot is made of absorbance
               versus added  concentration and the value of the X-intercept is taken
'|             as the analyte concentration.
.                 The method of  standard  addition eliminates interferences  that
               cause constant multiplicative errors in the concentration of analyte
I             measured.  As an  example of  this type  of interference,  consider  a
               sample with a true  analyte concentration of 1.0 ppm.  The analyst
|             assays the sample and  determines a concentration of 0.5 mg/1 indicating
_             an interference factor of  .5.   (This is a. negative interference  since
™             the interference  factor is "less  than 1.)  The sample  is spiked with
I             small quantities  of the analyte  to produce  an added concentration of
               1.0 ppm and 2.0 ppm and values of 1  ppm and 1.5 ppm,  respectively,
•             are obtained.  From these results the  analyst decides there is an
_             interference  and  plots the data   (Figure 1).

I

I

I

I

I

I

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 1.   Data and Plot of Method of Standard Additions
Concentration of analyte
added after dilution
by sample
         (mg/1)
           0
           1
           2
 *Measured
  Concentration


     Ong/1)
       .5
      1.0
      1.5
    **Measured
     Absorbance
        .05
        .10
        .15
 *This represents an interference factor of .5.
**The standard curve had a slope of .1 and a /-intercept of zero.

                          t Absorbance
                        .3

                        .2

                        .1
             -2.0   -1.0
1.0   2.0
Amount Added
  (Concentration, mg/1)
Scale of negative concentration
values and positive concentration
values must be' the same.


The extrapolation of the line to the X-intercept generates the actual


concentration of the sample (ignoring the negative sign).


     The addition of small known quantities of the analyte or "spiking"

to determine sample concentration is based upon the Beer's Law


relationship:  the absorbance is directly proportional to the concentration


of the analyte present   (Figure 2)  .

-------
I
              Figure 2.   Plot of Absorbance vs Concentration with Application of Beer's Law
1
1


!• Absorbance Ab^-^
*5^^


^^ Concentration
[ t

0 IX+ISo IX+ISi
I Beer's Law:

Abo Abi
• IX -f IS0 = IX f ISi
: or

KX = (Ab0) (Si) I
Abi -Ab0 I
;
or

where: Abo = Absorbance of solution
with concentration =
IX + IS0
Abi = Absorbance of solution with
concentration = IX + ISi
I = Interference factor (constant
multiplicative error)

S0 s 0 spike addition = 0
Si - Concentration of analyte added
after dilution by the
volume (sample volume
total
+ spike
X = Ab0Si / (Abi - Ab0) volume)
.


The sample concentration may
• proportion (Figure 2) . The
X = Concentration of analyte in
sample

be determined by solving for x in the
method of standard additions plot




may be generalized (Figure 3) :
1 Figure 3. Generalized Plot of Method of Standard Additions

1
1 ^>
^^^
• Absorbance
^^^'"
^^^
Amount Added




M, X1 S0 Si (Concentration)
y = mX + b
Iat y = o
X1 = -b/m
b = Ab0
_ m =(Abi - Ab0)/ Si
• X1 = -Ab0Si / (Abi ~ Abo)
where: Abo = Absorbance of solution with
zero analyte addition
Abi = Absorbance of solution
associated with addition of
spike of Si
S0 = 0 spike addition


•" Si = Concentration of analyte added

1
after dilution by the
volume (sample volume
volume)
total
+ spike
X1 = Method of standard addition


determined concentration of
analyte in sample
3

-------
 I
 •     Again, a linear relationship based upon Beer's Law is assumed.  A linear
        relation is defined:  y = mX+b; where y is the absorbance, X is the concentration,
 J     m is the slope, and b is the y-intercept.  At the X-intercept, y = o and X1 =
 ^     -b/m, or X1 = -AboSi/Abi-Abo-  The extrapolation generates the same numerical
 •     value (but negative in sign) as the true result and is therefore apol-icable to
 •     additions of small volumes of analyte.  The interference free (true) result
        was obtained from the Beer's Law relation because of the constant nature of
 •     the interference.
 _          A problem arises in using the extrapolation method when significant
 *     and varying dilutions of the sample by the addition of the spike are involved.
 •     The spiked samples are prepared by adding a significant volume of analyte and
        diluting to a pre-set volume with the sample (i.e., 1. establish a pre-set
 £     volume, for example, 100 ml; 2.  for the first spiked sample, add 2 ml of
        analyte of a known concentration and add 98 ml of sample to bring the total
 •     volume to 100 ml; 3.  for the second spiked sample, add 4 ml of analyte of the
 •      same known concentration and add 96 ml of sample to bring the total volume
        to 100 ml; etc.).The results obtained from this method of standard additions
 •      are incorrect because the concentration of the interferent varies in each
        spiked sample aliquot.  In order to accurately determine the analyte
I
I
I
I
I
I
concentration, the concentration of the interferent must be kept constant.
This can be accomplished by following the EPA method of standard additions.
                                                                                4.

-------
I
            The results of the  EPA method of  standard  additions outlined  in  the
        1974 and  1979 editions of the  EPA Manual of. Methods of. Chemical  Analysis
•      of Water  and Wastes* may be effected  by dilution.  The EPA method  requires
        that a constant volume of sample be added to a constant volume of  standards
I      and blank.   If the volume of sample consistently used  is V and the volume
m      of standards and blank is consistantly v where V f v,  this experiment may
        be generalized to that presented in Figures 4(1) and 4(2).
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

        Petal's  section page 12, 1979 EPA Manual of Methods of Chemical Analysis
m       of Water and Wastes
I

I

I

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
t
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
Figure 4(1).   Correct result obtained using Beer's  Law coupled with
              the Dilution and Interference Factors and Using the
              Procedure outlined by EPA
V
1 v blk

V
v std #1

V
v std #2

V
v std #3 1
                    Absorbance
                                         Ab]
                        Abc
                                                                 Concentration
                        IFX+IZT0
                                        IFX+IZTi
                                    where:
   Abr
             Abj
IPX + IZTO  IFX
  or X =   Z   -AbpTj
           F

  but; Z/F = v/V
V
v
F
z
I
                                           T]_

                                          Ab
therefore; X    =  v
            True   V
                         AbQTi
                         Abi-Abo
Volume of sample
Volume of standard or blank
V/CV+v)
V/CY+V)
Any interference factor
Concentration of the analyte
in the blank = 0
Concentration of the analyte
in standard #1 (S1=ZTi)
Absorbance associated with
the concentration:
IFX+JZT0
Absorbance associated with
the concentration:
                                              X = Sample concentration
                                                                      6.

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 4(2).   Incorrect result obtained using the Method of Standard
              Additions as outlined by EPA, where V •£ v, (an example
              is included in the appendix).
1
i v blk

V
v std #1

V
v std #2i

V !
v std #3i
                               •• Absorbance
                                  where:
   y - mXl+b
   m = Ay/ AX
b = y-intercept
at y=o, X:=-b/m
therefore; X^C
                     Ab
                                         V =
                                         v =
                                        TO =

                                        TI =
                                          Ab   =
                        Abi-Ab0
       Abj-Ab0
                                                              Amount Added
                                                                (Concentration)
Volume of sample
Volume of standard or blank
Concentration of the analyte
in the blank = 0
Concentration of the analyte
in standard #1


Absorbance associated with
zero analyte addition
Absorbance associated with
addition of a concentration
of Tj_
Method of standard addition
determined concentration of
analyte in sample

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
These results indicate that if v jt V,  this method of standard additions

does not yield accurate results.  The results of extrapolation may

be corrected by a factor, -(v/V):


                          X    -(Xl)Cv/VH-l)
                           True

     If the "Amount Added" is interpreted as the concentration of

standard corrected for dilution by the sample, the true result remains:
                          X    =  Z   Ab0Ti
                           True   F   Ab-A
the extrapolation becomes:
                          X1 =  -Ab0
 (See Figure 5)
Figure S.  Incorrect result obtained using the Method of Standard
           Additions when Dilution of the Sample by the Spike is
           Disregarded (V ^ v)
                     h Absorbance
                                          Amount Added
                                            (Concentration)
                                  where:
   y = mX+b
   m = Ay/AX =
   b = Ab0
   at y=o, X =-b/m
    X^C-Abp  ZTl)
  V
  v
  F
  Z
Ab
                                           X1 =
Volume of sample
Volume of standard or blk
V/CV+v)
v/CV+v )
Concentration of the analyte
in standard #1 (Si=ZTi)
Absorbance associated with
zero standard addition
Afasorbance associated with
addition of a concentration
of ZTi
Method of standard addition
determined concentration of
analyte in sample

-------
1
fl The result of the extrs
by a factor: X =
• True
The EPA method of

ipolation, X1 = (-Ab0) (ZTi) , may be corrected
Abi -Ab0
[X^C-l ) , where F = V/(v+V).
F
standard additions yields accurate results
Iwhen v = V. In this case F = V - Z - v and Beer's Law with

v+V v-t-V
- correction for dilution yields the result:
•. Ab0 = Ab^ or X = AboTi
IPX IPX +IETi True Abi-Abo
1 which is the same result obtained from a plot of absorbance vs the
_~ concentration of the analyte in the added standard (See Figure 6) .
1

Figure 6. Plot of Absorbance vs Concentration Added when V=v
'•; Correct result
1
•A AD^,^-
1^
'
• Absorbance ~

^


Xa T0 TI (Concentration)
1
w

y = mX+b
at y = 0, X1 = -b/m
b = Ab0

where: V = Volume of sample
v = Volume of standard or blank
TI = Concentration of the analyte
in standard #1
Abo = Absorbance associated with
Im = Ay/ AX ~ (Abi - Ab0)/T^ zero standard addition
X1 = (-Abp) (Ti) / (Abi - Abo) Abl = Absorbance associated with
X (X*) (v/V) (-1)
ITrue
,
X = (X:)(-l)
True

I
..•
I
1

1
and v = V; addition of a concentration
of TI
X = True concentration of analyte
in sample
X1 = Method of standard addition
determined concentration of
analyte in sample


9 .


-------
 I
 I
                    The EPA method of standard additions does not account for the
'•             dilution of sample by the standard except when:
 I
 I
                    1.  The volume of sample used is the same as the volume of standard,
                        V = v.
                    2,  Zero analyte was initially present,  Ab0 = 0.
 •                  3.  No dilution of sample by standard occurs (insignificant
                        volumes, e.g. microliter  of standard and blank are used and
 £                      diluted to a constant volume with sample).
 «             If the volumes of sample and standard are significant and unequal,
               the extrapolation will only yield accurate results if a correction
 M             factor is employed (an example is included in the Appendix).
                    In conclusion, the method of standard addition does not necessarily
 £             correct for dilutions resulting from the addition of the analyte.

 I

 I

 I

 I

 I

 I

I

 I

I
                                                                                         10.

-------
1
1
1



1



1

1

1
^B
I

1
I


1

I


A 1.0 mg/1 phenol reference
antipyrine method. The results

and from the method of standard
Standard Calibration Curve
Concentration
(mg/1)
0
.2
.5
.7

1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
The reference sample had an
1.0 mg/1 based upon the standard
Standard Method of Additions
Twenty milliliters of sampl

Appendix
sample was analyzed using the 4-amino
obtained from a standard calibration curve

additions follow.

Absorbance

.000
.029
.070
.098 correlation coefficient = .999
slope = .140
.142 y-intercept = -.000346
.272
.421
.562
absorbance of 0.142 which corresponds to
calibration curve.

e were placed into each of four flasks. To
flask #1, 80 ml of deionized water were added. To flask #2, 80 ml of a 0.5 mg/1
phenol solution were added. To
were added. To flask #4, 80 ml
flask #3, 80 ml of a 1.0 mg/1 phenol solution
of a 2.0 mg/1 phenol solution were added. The
concentrations added and absorbances obtained are tabulated in Table I.
1
1
1
1








11

-------
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 1
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
 I
I
I
I
I
I
                                   Table I
     Flask No.

         1

         2

         3

         4
Concentration Added
      (mg/1)
          0
                                 correlation coefficient
                           .084  slope = .112
                                 y-intercept =  .027
                           .138  at y = o, x =  -.240
                                           Absorbance

                                              .027


                            .5


                           1.0


                           2.0                .252


     The result obtained from a plot of the data in Table I is 0.240 rag


phenol/1.  This value is incorrect due to the dilution of the sample by the


spike.  The actual concentration may be obtained by multiplying the value


of the x-intercept by v/V (see Equation 1), where v is the spike volume and


V is the sample volume.




    Actual Concentration = (Value of the x-intercept)(-1)(v/V)     Equation 1

 In this example, the actual concentration =  (-.240)(-1)(80/20) = 0.96 mg/1.
   ,  Alternatively, the concentrations of the standards added may be corrected

for dilution by the sample.  In Table II, the added concentrations corrected

for dilution by the sample and corresponding absorbances are listed.  (Tables I

and II are identical except that the concentrations added have been corrected

for dilution by the sample in Table II).
.9999
     Flask No.



         1


         2


         3


         4
               Table II

Added Cone. Corrected
    for Dilution
       (mg/1)
           0


           .4
         1.6
                                             Absorbance
                                                .027
                                                      correlation coefficient = .999
                                                .084  slope = .140
                                                      y-intercept = .027
                                                .138  at y = o,x = -.192


                                                .252
                                                                                1.2.

-------
I

I           The result obtained from a plot of the data in Table II is 0.192 mg/1.
—      Again an incorrect result is generated.  The actual value may be obtained by
        multiplying the x-intercept by (v+V)/v, where v is the spike volume and V is
•      the sample volume (see Equation 2).

f          Actual Concentration = (Value of the x-intercept)(-1)(v+V)/v      Equation 2

*      In this example, the actual concentration = (-.192)(-1)(100/20) =0.96 mg/1.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I
13,

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
   EPA  903/9-80-004
2.
                                                             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

   METHOD  OF STANDARD ADDITIONS AND EFFECTS OF DILUTION
                               5. REPORT DATE
                                      May 1980
                                                             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
            J.  L. Slayton
           and  E. R. Trovato
                                                             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS

       Annapolis Field Office,  Region  III
       U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
       Annapolis Science Center
  	Annapolis. Maryland 214Q1	
                                                             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                               11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME ANO ADDRESS
        same
                                                             13. TYPE OF REPORT ANO PERIOD COVERED
                                                             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                                    EPA/903/00
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
      The basis  and limitation of the Method  of Standard  Addition is discussed
      with particular emphasis placed on the  effects of dilution often  encountered
      in using this analytical tool.  Dilutions employed  when using Standard Additions
      may effect the sample matrix.   This problem may be  avoided by maintaining a
      constant sample dilution.   If' significant dilution  of  the sample  is  involved,
      a dilution factor must be  applied to obtain the correct result by  the Method
      of Standard Additions.
17.
                                 KEY WORDS ANO DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                               b.lOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                             c. COSATI Field/Group
       Standard Addition
       Beer's Law
                        Interference
                        Spike
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

      RELEASE  TO PUBLIC
                 19. SECURITY CLASS (ThaReport)
                      UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
     13
                                               20. SECURITY CLASS (This page/
                                                    UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                           22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
                                                         INSTRUCTIONS

    1.   REPORT NUMBER
         Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

    2.   LEAVE BLANK

    3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
         Reserved for use by each report recipient.

    4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
         Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently.  Set-subtitle, if used, in smaller
         type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
         number and include subtitle for the specific title.

    5.   REPORT DATE
         Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year.  Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., datf of issue, date of
        approval, date of preparation, etc.).

    6.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
         Leave blank.

    7.  AUTHOR(S)
        Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.). List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
        zation.

    8.  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
        Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

    9.  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
        Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code.  List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

    10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
        Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

    11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
        Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.

    12.  SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
        Include ZIP code.

    13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
        Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates*covered.

    14.  SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
        Leave blank.

    IS.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
        Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as:  Prepared in cooperation with. Translation of, Presented at conference of,
        To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

    16.  ABSTRACT
        Include a brief (700 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report.  If the report contains a
        significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

    17.   KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
        (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that  identify the major
        concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as  index entries for cataloging.

        (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS • Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
        ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

        (c) COSATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI  Subject Category List. Since the ma-
        jority of documents are multidisciptinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will  be specific discipline, area of human
        endeavor, or type of physical  object.  The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
        the primary posting(s).

    18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
        Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited."  Cite any availability to
        the public, with address and price.

    19. &20.  SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
        DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

    21.  NUMBER OF PAGES
        Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

    22.  PRICE
        Insert the pnce set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA form 2220-1 (9-73) (R«v«r«|

-------