United States
Environmental Protection Agency
                  Region II!
                  Philadelphia, PA 19107
                      EPA/903-K-95-003
                      December 1995
Region III
Technical Guidance Manual
Risk Assessment
                                  Assessing Dermal  Exposure from Soil
                                                            EPA Contact: Jennifer Hubbard
                EPA
                Region III
                    Hazardous Waste Management Division
                    Office of Superfund Programs
                    December 1995
Dermal absorption from soil is one of the routes of exposure that may be addressed during risk assessment at
Superfund sites.  One factor necessary to estimate dose, and therefore risk, via this route is the absorption factor of
a chemical from soil.  This document is intended to provide default assumptions for this factor in the assessment of
dermal soil exposure.
ASSESSING  DERMAL
EXISTING GUIDANCE
CONTACT  WITH  SOIL;
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume I.
Human Health  Evaluation Manual (Part A) ("RAGS";
EPA, 1989) presents an equation used  to estimate
exposure from dermal contact with soil:

 AD = CS x CF x SA x AF x ABS x EF x ED
                 BWxAT

 Where:

   AD = Absorbed dose (mg/kg/day)
   CS = Chemical concentration in soil (mg/kg)
   CF = Conversion factor (10"" kg/mg)
   SA =  Skin surface area available  for contact
   (cm2/event)
   AF = Soil-to-skin adherence factor (mg/cm2)
   ABS = Absorption factor (unitiess)
   EF = Exposure frequency (events/year)
   ED = Exposure duration (years)
   BW = Body weight (kg)
   AT = Averaging time (period over which exposure
   is averaged-days)

   (RAGS, Exhibit 6-15)

RAGS then states: "Absorption factors (ABS) are used
to reflect the desorption of the chemical from soil and
the absorption of the chemical across the skin and into
the  bloodstream.   Consult the open literature  for
information on chemical-specific absorption factors. In
the absence  of  chemical-specific information,  use
conservative assumptions to estimate ABS.' The use of
conservative   assumptions   is  appropriate  when
determining Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME),
and reflects EPA's policy that protection of human
health should be ensured.

Assessment of dermal  exposure  is important for a
complete risk assessment This document summarizes
chemical-specific  and   general   (for   classes  of
compounds) absorption factors that have been found in
the limited  database available.   The factors  were
compiled from existing  national guidance and peer-
reviewed scientific literature.  It is recommended that
these  numbers be  used as  defaults for the  ABS
parameter when calculating RME soil exposure in the
absence of chemical-specific, site-specific information.
These defaults are  presented in order  to  facilitate
performance of risk assessments by compiling these
factors in one place, and to promote consistency in risk
assessment

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)

A review of studies assessing the dermal absorption of
3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl (TCB) from soil appeared
in EPA, 1992. The range of absorption was reported to
be 0.6% to 6%. Region  III recommends accepting the
6% value as a conservative  assumption of  ABS for
polychlorinated biphenyls, in keeping with RAGS.
                                                                          EPA Report Collection
                                                                          Information Resource Center
                                                                          US EPA Region 3
                                                                          Philadelphia, PA 19107

-------
CHLORINATED DIOXINS

A review of studies assessing the dermal absorption of
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p_-dioxin  (TCDD) from  soil
appeared in EPA, 1992. The range of absorption was
reported to be 0.1% to 3%.  Region III recommends
accepting the 3% value as a conservative assumption
of ABS for chlorinated dioxins, in keeping with RAGS.
CADMIUM

A review of studies assessing the dermal absorption of
cadmium from soil appeared in EPA, 1992. The range
of absorption was reported to be 0.1% to 1%.  Region
III   recommends  accepting  the   1%  value as  a
conservative assumption  of  ABS for  cadmium,  in
keeping with RAGS.

ARSENIC

In vivo studies from Wester et al. 1993a, report 3.2% for
a dose  of 0.6  ug/cm2.   Region III  recommends
accepting this as a default ABS for arsenic.

OTHER METALS

Suggested ABS factors based on the pharmacokinetic
properties of chemicals appeared in Ryan et at. 1987.
The  proposed  range  for  dermal absorption  of
inorganics from soil was 0.1% to 1%.  This  was also
consistent with  a review of the studies for cadmium, an
inorganic, as  assessed in EPA,  1992.   Region  III
recommends accepting the 1% value as a conservative
assumption  of  ABS  for inorganics, in  keeping  with
RAGS.

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Volatile organics are especially difficult to assess,
because most studies to date  have involved occluding
the  skin,  which  may give  artificially high ABS  values,
since these compounds would also be  expected  to
volatilize from the skin. Suggested ABS factors based
on  the  pharmacokinetic  properties  of chemicals
appeared in Ryan etal. 1987.  The  proposed  range for
dermal absorption of volatile  organics from soil was
10% to 25%.  However, experimental data show even
lower ABS values for volatile  organics.  For  volatile
organics   such   as   benzene   (vapor   pressure
approximately 95.2 mm Hg),  Region III recommends
accepting the 0.05% value based on Skowronski etal.
1988, and Franz, 1984.  This would include chemicals
such as 1,1-dichloroethane 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and
other volatiles with vapor pressure similar to or greater
than  that  of benzene.    For  volatiles  such "as
ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethene, toluene, and xylenes,
which have vapor pressures lower than that of benzene
(and less volatilization from the skin may  occur),  a
default ABS of 3% is recommended.

These numbers only apply to non-occluded skin, which
would be the scenario expected for most environmental
exposures. If, however, the skin is occluded for any
reason, higher ABS values (up to 100%) should be
used.

PENTACHLOROPHENOL

    In vivo studies from Wester et al. 1993b, report
24.4%  for a dose of 0.7 ug/cm2  in  soil.  Region III
recommends  accepting this as a default  ABS for
pentachlorophenol.

OTHER SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Suggested ABS factors based on the  pharmacokinetic
properties of chemicals appeared in Ryan et al. 1987.
The  proposed   range  for  dermal   absorption  of
semivolatile organics from soil was 1% to 10%.  The
reported  absorption  of  topically   applied   pure
benzo[a]pyrene in studies in EPA, 1992,  ranged from
1% to 13%. Kao et al, 1985, reported approximately 3%
for absorption of topically applied pure benzo[a]pyrene
by in vitro human skin. The absorption from soil would
be expected to be lower and indicates that the range in
Ryan et al. 1987,  may be conservative with respect to
this  particular   compound  but  not   necessarily
unreasonable.  Region III recommends accepting the
10% value as a conservative assumption of ABS for
semivolatile organics, in keeping with RAGS.

PESTICIDES

Suggested ABS factors based on the  pharmacokinetic
properties of chemicals appeared in Ryan et al. 1987.
The proposed range for dermal absorption of pesticides
from soil was 1% to 10%. The reported absorption of
topically applied pesticides and herbicides in acetone
to in vitro human skin was  reported to be within this
range for lindane, aldrin, dieldrin, malathion, parathion,
and 2,4-D in Feldmann  and Maibach,  1974.   DDT
absorption from soil in monkey and human skin was
reported to range from 1.04 to 3.3% in EPA,  1992.
These studies indicate that the range in Ryan et al.
1987,  may  be  conservative but  not  necessarily
unreasonable.  Region III recommends accepting the
10% value as a conservative assumption of ABS for
pesticides, in keeping with RAGS.

-------
APPLICATIONS OF THIS GUIDANCE

This  document  represents  a  summary  of  best
professional judgment at this time. It is not intended to
be a detailed technical analysis of dermal exposure
experimentation.  As a summary of best professional
judgment and default parameters, the recommendations
herein may be superseded by newer, chemical-specific
and route-specific studies, or by site-specific studies of
acceptable quality.

These factors apply to absorption from soil or sediment
Dermal absorption of chemicals from water is discussed
in RAGS and  EPA, 1992.

It should  be noted that  when estimating  absorbed
doses for  chemicals,  dose-response parameters such
as Reference Doses (RfDs) and Cancer Slope Factors
(CSFs) should be adjusted accordingly, where possible
and appropriate, as per RAGS Appendix A.

SUMMARY

Dermal absorption from soil  is one of the routes of
exposure   that  may   be  addressed   during   risk
assessment at Superfund sites. One factor necessary
to estimate dose, and therefore risk, via this route is the
absorption factor of  a chemical from  soil.   This
document recommends  default assumptions for this
factor in the assessment of dermal soil exposure, based
on  the   limited  available  information   and  best
professional judgment.

REFERENCES

EPA, 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund,
    Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual  (Part
    A). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
    December, 1989.  EPA/540/1-89/002.
Kao, J.K., F.K. Patterson, and J. Hall, 1985.  Skin
    penetration and metabolism  of topically  applied
    chemicals  in  six mammalian  species, including
    man: An in vitro study with benzo[a]pyrene and
    testosterone.  Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  81:502-
    518.

Ryan, EA, E.T. Hawkins, et al.  1987.  Assessing Risk
    from  Dermal Exposure at Hazardous Waste Sites.
    In Bennett, G.  and J. Bennett, eds. Superfund '87:
    Proceedings of  the Eighth National Conference;
    November  16-18; Washington, D.C. The Hazardous
    Materials Control Research Institute, pp. 166-168.

Skowronski,  GA, R.M.  Turkall,  and  M.S.  Abdel-
    Rahman.      1988.     Soil   adsorption   alters
    bioavailability of benzene in dermally exposed male
    rats.  Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc. J. 49(10):506-511.

Wester, R.C., H.I. Maibach, etal. 1993a. In vivo and jn
    vitro   percutaneous   absorption   and  skin
    decontamination of arsenic from water and soil.
    Fundamental and Applied Toxicology.  Vol. 20. No.
    3, pp. 338-340.

Wester, R.C., H.I. Maibach, etal. 1993b. Percutaneous
    absorption   of  pentachlorophenol  from  soil.
    Fundamental and Applied Toxicology.  Vol. 20, No.
    1, pp. 68-71.
For additional information, call (215) 597-1309.
Approved by:
Thomas C. Voltagrfio
Hazardous Waste Maria
                                      tor
                                    ment Division
EPA, 1992.  Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles
    and Applications. Interim Report Office of Health
    and Environmental  Assessment January, 1992.
    EPA/600/8-91/011/B.

Feldmann, R.J. and H.I. Maibach, 1974.  Percutaneous
    penetration of some pesticides and herbicides in
    man.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 28:126-132.

Franz,  T.J.,  1984.    Percutaneous  absorption  of
    benzene.   Adv. Modern Environ. Toxicol. Vol. 6.
    Applied Toxicology of Petroleum Hydrocarbons.
    Princeton Scientific Publishers, Inc., Princeton, N.J.
    pp. 61-70.

-------