EPA/454/R-01/010
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA-454/R-01-010
November 2001
Office Of Air Quality
Planning And Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Air
& EPA
EMISSION TESTING AT A STRUCTURAL
BRICK MANUFACTURING PLANT:
FINAL EMISSION TEST REPORT FOR
TESTING AT BELDEN BRICK COMPANY
PLANT 6, SUGARCREEK, OH,
NOVEMBER 8 TO 12,1993
'J. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1445 ROSS AVENUE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75W2 .«
aad
Ed
-------
EPA-454/R-01-010
EMISSION TESTING AT A STRUCTURAL BRICK MANUFACTURING PLANT:
FINAL EMISSION TEST REPORT FOR TESTING AT BELDEN BRICK COMPANY
PLANT 6, SUGARCREEK, OH, NOVEMBER 8 TO 12,1993
This document was prepared by:
Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC
and under contract, by:
Midwest Research Institute
Kansas City, MO and Gary, NC
EPA Contract Number 68-D2-0159
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Radiation
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
November 31,2001
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication as received from the
contractor. The contents reflect the views and policies of the Agency, but any mention of trade
names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
PREFACE
This report of emission testing at a structural brick manufacturing plant was prepared
under Contract No. 68-D2-0159, Work Assignments 1-01 and n-01. The report, which
describes testing that was performed at Plant 6 of the Belden Brick Company in Sugarcreek,
Ohio, on November 8 to 12, 1993, was prepared by Ms. April Carender, Mr. Slawomir
Szydlo, and Mr. Richard Marinshaw of Midwest Research Institute (MRI). Mr. Marinshaw
is the Work Assignment Leader for this project; the EPA Work Assignment Manager is
Mr. Ronald Myers of the Emission Factor and Inventory Group (EFIG).
Approved:
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Roy NeulichtN
Program Manager
111
-------
CONTENTS
FIGURES VI
TABLES vii
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM 1-1
1.2 KEY PERSONNEL 1-2
2. PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 2-1
2.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 2-1
2.2 FLUE GAS, AMBIENT, AND PROCESS MATERIAL
SAMPLING LOCATIONS 2-6
3. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3-1
3.1 OBJECTIVES AND TEST MATRIX 3-1
3.2 FIELD TEST CHANGES AND PROBLEMS 3-4
3.3 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS 3-5
4. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4-1
4.1 EMISSION TEST METHODS 4-1
4.2 PROCESS DATA MEASUREMENT 4-13
4.3 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4-14
5. INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 5-1
5.1 METALS ANALYSIS 5-1
5.2 SEMTVOLATTLE ANALYSIS 5-6
5.3 VOST ANALYSIS 5-11
APPENDIX A—FIELD DATA FORMS A-l
APPENDIX B—PROCESS OPERATING DATA B-l
APPENDIX C—ANALYTICAL RESULTS C-l
APPENDIX D—QA/QC AUDIT REPORT D-l
APPENDIX E—SAMPLE CALCULATIONS E-l
APPENDK F-RESULTS OF RETEST OF DRYER EMISSIONS F-l
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
2-1 Layout of Belden Brick Plant No. 6 2-2
2-2 Fire clay process flow diagram for Belden Brick, Plant No. 6,
Sugar Creek, Ohio 2-3
2-3 Vibrating screen with hood and ductwork 2-4
2-4 Fabric filter inlet and outlet sampling locations 2-8
2-5 Kiln stack sampling location 2-9
2-6 Dryer stack sampling location 2-10
4-1 Sampling system for oxygen and carbon dioxide 4-2
4-2 Schematic of the metals sampling train 4-3
4-3 Schematic for the MM5-PCIF train for paniculate matter,
HC1, and HF 4-5
4-4 Volatile organics sampling train (VOST) 4-6
4-5 Schematic of the semivolatile organic sampling train (SVOST) 4-7
4-6 SVOST sample recovery 4-8
4-7 Method 201A sampling train 4-10
4-8 Schematic of instrumental measurement system 4-12
4-9 Analysis scheme for Method 29 metals train 4-15
4-10 Analysis scheme for MM5-SV train components 4-20
VI
-------
TABLES
Number Page
3-1 SUMMARY MATRIX FOR BELDEN BRICK PLANT 6 3-2
3-2 BELDEN BRICK-TEST SCHEDULE 3-3
3-3 SUMMARY OF GRINDING/SCREENING EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION
FACTORS-FILTERABLE PM AND PM-10 3-6
3-4 SUMMARY OF PROCESS SAMPLE MOISTURE AND SIEVE ANALYSIS . . 3-7
3-5 SUMMARY OF KILN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS-
METALS 3-8
3-6 SUMMARY OF KILN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS-
SPECIATED VOC 3-9
3-7 SUMMARY OF KILN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION
FACTORS-SEMIVOLATILES 3-11
3-8 SUMMARY OF KILN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS--
INORGANIC GASES, TOC, AND METHANE 3-12
3-9 SUMMARY OF KTLN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS-PM,
PM-10 3-13
3-10 SUMMARY OF KILN EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS-HF,
HCL, CL2 3-14
3-11 SUMMARY OF DRYER EMISSION RATES AND EMISSION FACTORS-
TOC, METHANE, AND ETHANE 3-15
3-12 SUMMARY OF PROCESS RATES FOR GRINDING/SCREENING
OPERATION 3-16
3-13 SUMMARY OF DRYER PROCESS DATA 3-16
3-14 SUMMARY OF KILN PROCESS DATA 3-16
3-15 GRINDING/SCREENING AMBIENT PM-10 MEASUREMENTS 3-17
3-16 GRINDING/SCREENING EMISSION TEST RESULTS-FABRIC FILTER
INLET FILTERABLE PM, PM-10 3-19
3-17 GRINDING/SCREENING EMISSION TEST RESULTS-FABRIC FILTER
OUTLET FILTERABLE PM, PM-10 3-20
3-18 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-METALS 3-23
3-19 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-SPECIATED VOC 3-25
3-20 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-SEMIVOLATILES 3-32
3-21 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-INORGANIC GASES 3-40
3-22 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-TOC, METHANE/ETHANE 3-42
3-23 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-PM, PM-10, CONDENSffiLE PM 3-43
3-24 KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-HF, HCL, CI^ 3-47
3-25 DRYER EMISSION TEST RESULTS-TOC, METHANE AND ETHANE . . . 3-48
4-1 TARGET ANALYTES FOR METHOD 8240 (VOST) 4-17
4-2 MODIFICATIONS TO THE VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS METHODS .4-18
4-3 TARGET ANALYTES FOR METHOD 8270 4-21
Vll
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
5-1 METALS, FILTER, AND ACETONE RINSE REAGENT BLANK RESULTS . . 5-2
5-2 MERCURY REAGENT AND METHOD BLANK RESULTS 5-3
5-3 QC SUMMARY FOR METALS ICP ANALYSIS 5-4
5-4 QC SUMMARY FOR MERCURY CVAA ANALYSIS 5-5
5-5 SURROGATE RECOVERY, % 5-7
5-6 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND QA RESULTS 5-8
5-7 QA SURROGATE RECOVERY, % 5-10
5-8 VOST SURROGATE RECOVERIES 5-13
5-9 VOST AUDIT SAMPLE RESULTS 5-14
Vlll
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 SUMMARY OF TEST PROGRAM
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS), Emission Factor and Inventory Group (EFIG) is responsible for
preparing and periodically updating the document entitled Compilation of Air Pollutant
Emission Factors (AP-42). During the past 3 years, EFIG has been working with the Brick
Institute of America (BIA) and the Brick Association of North Carolina (BANG) to develop
improved emission factors for AP-42 Section 11.3, Bricks and Related Clay Products. In
addition to collecting readily available test reports for emission tests conducted at brick
manufacturing plants, EFIG sponsored emission tests at three structural brick manufacturing
facilities. This test program was also developed as a result of an evaluation performed by
the Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division that indicated that brick manufacturing
facilities were responsible for a significant quantity of paniculate matter (PM) emissions in
areas of nonattainment of PM less than 10 micrometers in aerodynamic diameter (PM-10).
However, that study was based upon the existing AP-42 emission factors, which were
suspected of greatly overestimating emissions from brick manufacturing.
In September 1992, an emission test was conducted at a brick manufacturing facility
that uses sawdust-fired kilns, and in August 1993, EFIG sponsored an emission test at a
brick facility that uses coal-fired kilns. This test report presents the results of the emission
test conducted at the third structural brick manufacturing plant, Belden Brick Company
(Belden), Plant No. 6, which uses gas-fired kilns.
Belden's Plant No. 6 is located in Sugarcreek, Ohio. The plant was selected for
testing because it was identified by BIA as being representative of gas-fired structural brick
manufacturing plants. In addition, emissions from the grinding/screening operation at Belden
can be readily tested because the emissions are ducted to an air pollution control device. A
further reason for selecting Belden is that the raw materials used to manufacture bricks at the
facility is different in terms of texture, moisture, and chemical composition from the material
used by the two brick facilities tested previously.
During the period November 8 through 12, 1993, a series of emission tests were
conducted by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) at Belden's Plant No. 6. The
grinding/screening operation was sampled for emissions of PM-10 simultaneously with
background ambient air sampling for PM-10; the unfired brick drying operation was sampled
1-1
-------
for emissions of methane/ethane and total organic compounds (TOC); and the brick firing
(kiln) operation was sampled for emissions of filterable PM, filterable PM-10, condensible
PM, volatile organic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds, hydrogen fluoride
(HF), hydrogen chloride (HC1), multiple metals, TOC, nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide
(SO-j), carbon monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide (CC^). In addition, process samples of
the fine material exiting the grinding/screening operation were collected for moisture and
sieve analysis.
1.2 KEY PERSONNEL
The key personnel who coordinated the test program and their telephone numbers are
as follows:
EFIG Work Assignment Manager, Ron Myers (919) 541-5407
MRI Program Manager for EFIG, Roy Neulicht (919) 677-0249
MRI Work Assignment Leader, Rick Marinshaw (919) 677-0249
MPJ Field Sampling Task Leader, Slawomir Szydlo (816) 753-7600
Belden Brick Company Contact, John Jensen (216) 852-2424
Brick Institute of America, Nelson Cooney (703) 620-0010
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS
2.1 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
Plant No. 6 consists of a central crushing, grinding, and screening operation, a central
brick-forming operation, eight brick dryers, and three kilns. Plant No. 6 produces 36 to
40 million bricks per year. The grinding/screening building operates 8 hours per day, 5 days
per week, and the kilns operate continuously. Figure 2-1 shows the layout of Plant No. 6
and identifies the general sampling locations; Figure 2-2 presents a process flow diagram for
the plant.
2.1.1 Raw Material Processing
Production begins at the grinding/screening operation, which is contained in a large
metal building that includes separate fire clay and shale processing lines. Each identical line
consists of a hopper, double-roll primary crusher, crushed material storage bins, a grinder,
and three screens. The raw material is transported from the mine by truck in loads of
approximately 23 megagrams (Mg) (25 tons). The trucks dump the material into the fire
clay or shale hoppers, from which the material is transported by drag chains to double-roll
primary crushers. From each crusher, the material is conveyed to storage bins, then to the
grinder and screens. All material is ground prior to screening. The facility uses single-deck
mechanically-vibrated screens with a mesh size of 14 (1.4 millimeters [mm]). Oversize
material from the screens is conveyed back to the grinder for further size reduction.
Undersized material from the screens is conveyed to the fine clay/shale storage bins located
in an adjacent building. Emissions from each line (crusher, grinder, screens, and conveyer
transfer points) are ducted to separate fabric filtration systems that are located just outside the
grinding/screening room.
The grinding/screening operation tests were conducted on the clay processing line
fabric filter. This fabric filter is a DCE, Incorporated, Model DLM 3/7/15 pulse jet filter.
The fabric filter has an air to cloth ratio of 7.4 to 1, a total filter area of 314 square meters
(mr) (3,381 square feet [fr]), and is designed for a flow rate of 708 cubic meters per minute
(irr/min) (25,000 cubic feet per minute [fr/min]). Figure 2-3 shows a vibrating screen with
the hood and ductwork that leads to the fabric filter. Two smaller ducts from the processing
line tie into the main exhaust duct downstream of the testing location. However, these two
smaller ducts exhaust conveyor pickup points, which do not contribute significantly to overall
emissions from the operation.
2-1
-------
w
o
jj
CO
o
o
?
t
a
OT
B I
-S .3
«s «
•c ^
i '3
vS x>
OD 00
s s
'2 'S
0) 0)
-
§,
o
o
«0
CO
rv
tr
0 @ @ © ©
C
•PH
hfl
C
2
13
CQ
«*-
o
•4^
o
CN
I
50
X 3
Cd o
.S aj
h bo
0) cC
*i t,
to o
2-2
-------
MINING
(PUG MILL)
CO A
> ^
o
o
<
GO
vO
>
•^ O CC
S[y
*a <=!
to o z u. u.
5So
'
FINE CLAY
STORAGE
U
Z
>Q ^
p
X
UJ
CUTTING
y > ^
OCC
^. £^
^^ "Hi
£u.
C3
5
o
en
UJ A
>^ A
cc
I V
SCREENING -
t
GRINDING
^r o 0° 7
w 9 z ^^.
SmQ ^
8gS §
DRYING
B "SI I
cc 2
UJ UJ ^ ^
O
^ JS
•^ -<— -
CO
"g=~
zS w
l|s
f\ t/)
<0- i
LU v v
O * MATERIAL FLOW
->• GAS FLOW/EMISSIONS
_J UJ
< 0
Sol
^
2 en
I k
>(3
trz
< X
2W
£§
t
TRANSPORT
BY TRUCK
t
«
^
2
COOLING -
1
STORAGE
AND
SHIPPING
•4
<
og
S§
f
HOT GAS RETURN TO DRYERS
LTER INLET
R OUTLET
NG LOCATIONS
NG/SCREENING FABRIC F
NG/SCREEN FABRIC FILTE
NG/SCREENING BUILDING AMBIENT SAMPLES
)E, 2 OUTSIDE)
MERIAL STORAGE CONVEYOR
ESS SAMPLES ONLY)
'ACK
STACK
i D D Q^ 50 5 £
1 1 1 P S 3 g
en d o oc. u-t x a
00© 0©0
O
• ^H
J3
O
u
S3
60
00
vo"
6
Z
•*-*
rt
s
M
O
•c
PQ
CD
2
"3
PQ
5
s
fi
bjj
rt
O
c
W3
cn
CD
>,
_rt
"o
HH
CN
(N
I
bo
E
2-3
-------
Figure 2-3. Vibrating screen with hood and ductwork.
2-4
-------
The fire clay line outlet duct is 0.84 m (33 in.) in diameter and is 3.8 m (12.3 ft) in
length. The airflow rate for the screen hood is about 68 nr/min (2,400 ft3/min), and the
airflow rate through the crusher and grinder pickup point and conveyor transfer point hood is
17.0 m3/min (600 ft3/min). The system carrying velocity is 1,370 m/min (4,500 ft/min).
Because nearly all of the emission points in the grinding room are hooded, fugitive
particulate matter (PM) emissions are negligible.
The grinding/screening operation products (fine clay and fine shale) are conveyed to
the fine clay/shale storage bins located in a building adjacent to the grinding/screening
building. Material from the fine clay/shale storage bins is conveyed to the mill room.
2.1.2 Extruding and Cutting
In the mill room, the material is conveyed to one of four extrusion lines. Lines 1 and
4 process shale, and lines 2 and 3 process fire clay. However, clay and shale can be mixed
on any of the four lines. Approximately one-third of the bricks produced in Plant 6 are
made from a blend of shales, one-third are made from fire clay blends, and the remaining
third are made from a mixture of fire clays and shales. The bricks fired during the emission
test were made from a blend of two shale materials.
Each extrusion line includes a pug mill, vacuum chamber, and die. The pug mills
mix the material with water to raise the material moisture content and discharge the material
directly into the vacuum chambers. The vacuum chambers remove the air and compact the
material. Next, the material is continuously augered through the dies. This is referred to as
the "stiff extrusion process." The material is extruded in four continuous columns, the
outsides of which are lubricated with No. 2 oil, which facilitates cutting. The columns then
pass through rotating wire cutters and are cut into the desired brick dimensions.
Several additives are mixed as needed with the raw material before extrusion. Iron
chromite and manganese dioxide are used for coloring purposes, and barium carbonate is
added to keep sulfates from rising to the surface of the brick. Additive feed is controlled by
computer.
2.1.3 Unfired Brick Drying
After cutting, the bricks are stacked by hand onto the kiln cars. On average, each car
carries 3,472 bricks, and during the test all kiln cars were loaded with exactly 3,472 bricks.
From the stacking area, the bricks are transported to eight dryers, which are heated by waste
heat from the cooling section of the kilns and by Dutch Oven type heaters, which are
additional gas-fired burners located on the top of the dryers. These dryers maintain
temperatures ranging from 49°C (120°F) at the entrances to 177°C (350°F) at the exits.
Three stacks vent emissions from the eight dryers to the atmosphere. Dryers 1,2, and 3
share a stack, dryers 4 and 5 share a stack, and dryers 6, 7, and 8 share a stack. The dryer
2-5
-------
stacks are circular in cross section and are made of steel. Testing was conducted on the
stack to dryers 6,1, and 8.
During the week of the test, Belden produced both standard size cored bricks and
solid bricks. The kiln cars each were loaded with the same quantities of cored and solid
bricks, and the rate of kiln car movement through the dryers was constant throughout the test
week. Therefore, the brick drying rate was constant during the test.
2.1.4 Brick Firing
Plant 6 has three natural gas-fired tunnel kilns that are used to fire the bricks.
Kilns 1 and 2 are 104 m (340 ft) long, and kiln 3 is 119 m (390 ft) long. Each kiln consists
of six sections, including the offtake, oxidation, preheat, firing, rapid cool, and cooling
sections. Kilns firing fire clay products maintain temperatures ranging from 204°C (400°F)
at the offtake section to about 1149°C (2100°F) at the hottest point of the firing section.
Between the firing and rapid cool sections is the zero point of each kiln. The zero point is
the theoretical point beyond which combustion gases do not pass. Beyond the zero point,
only the waste heat (no combustion gases) from the fired bricks in the cooling section is
emitted and ducted to the brick dryers.
Emissions from the kilns are ducted to two stacks, one serving kilns 1 and 2, and one
serving kirn 3. There are no emission control devices on either of the two stacks. Testing
was conducted on the stack for kiln 3.
During the week of the test, Belden processed both standard size cored bricks and
solid bricks in kiln 3. The kiln cars each were loaded with the same quantities of cored and
solid bricks, and the rate of kiln car movement through the kilns was constant throughout the
test week. Therefore, the brick production rate was constant during the test.
2.2 FLUE GAS, AMBIENT, AND PROCESS MATERIAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Emission sampling was conducted at the following locations: (1) the inlet to the
grinding/screening room fabric filter, (2) the outlet to the grinding/screening room fabric
filter, (3) the kiln stack, and (4) the dryer stack. Background ambient sampling was
conducted both inside and outside the grinding/screening building. In addition, process
samples were collected at the dropoff point of the conveyor that transports fine material from
the grinding/screening operation to the fine material storage bins. The following paragraphs
describe these sampling locations in detail.
2.2.1 Grinding/Screening Building Fabric Filter Inlet and Outlet
Emissions from the crusher, grinder, screen set, and conveyor transfer points are
ducted to a fabric filter located just outside of the grinding/screening building. Two smaller
ducts from the processing line tie into the main inlet duct to the fabric filter downstream of
the sampling location. However, these two smaller ducts exhaust conveyor transfer points
2-6
-------
are not believed to contribute significantly to overall emissions from the grinding/screening
operations.
The location of sampling ports for the inlet and outlet is schematically depicted in
Figure 2-4. The outlet duct is 0.84 m (33 in.) in diameter and approximately 3.7 m (12 ft)
in length. The inlet duct is 0.89 (35 in.) in diameter and approximately 3.7 m (12 ft) in
length.
2.2.2 Ambient Samples
Ambient PM-10 samples were collected both inside and outside the grinding/screening
building in order to determine background levels for the tests conducted on the
grinding/screening fabric filter (i.e., the background concentration of ambient air drawn into
the building). Two Hi-Vol samplers were set up outside the building: (one to the east of the
building and one to the west of the building), and one sampler was set up inside the building.
Figure 2-1 shows the relative locations of these samplers.
2.2.3 Kiln Stack
The square kiln exhaust stack tested during this program has inside dimensions of
1.7 m by 1.7 m (67 in. by 67 in.). There are no emission control devices associated with
this emission stream.
In order to obtain a representative sample of the flue gas, a set of five sampling ports
were installed on the kiln stack. The location of sampling ports and traverse points is shown
in Figure 2-5.
2.2.4 Dryer Stack
The stack venting emissions from dryers 6, 7, and 8 was sampled during the
test. The dryer stack is 1.45 m (57 in.) in diameter. Figure 2-6 shows the location of
sampling ports and traverse points for the dryer stack.
2.2.5 Process Samples
Samples of the fine material produced in the grinding/screening operation were
collected from the conveyor that transports the material from the grinding/screening building
to the fine material storage bins. For the purposes of measuring process rates for the
grinding/screening operation, Belden prepared a diversion chute to direct the material from
the conveyor dropoff point to a separate container. Samples of the processed material were
collected from the container for subsequent analysis.
2-7
-------
•* •<*• CM r>- 10 co
10 T- co co oq ••*
i- in o TC' oi co
T- CM CM CO
en
'Ci.
rt
O
T3
•s
JO
(N
I
W)
2-8
-------
X
=«:
CM
LO
-
in
cvi
CM
CO
co
CM
CO
CO
in
CO
•<*
0
3
m
e
^
o
S3
CO H-
=J O
y n
LL LU
O co
CL
CO
1
to
1
e
s^
"t
-
f
o
CO
too
|3
^O
ij- 2:
OH
> cc
LU
Q
CO
I -8
•£ o « c
avll
o
o
•i
"p.
in
(N
I
bfi
2-9
-------
2-10
-------
SECTION 3
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
3.1 OBJECTIVES AND TEST MATRIX
The primary objective of the test conducted at Belden's Plant No. 6 was to obtain
emission and process data to develop emission factors for structural brick raw material
grinding/screening operations and gas-fired brick kilns. The emission factors will be used to
update and revise the emission factors in Section 11.3, Bricks and Related Clay Products, of
AP-42. Specifically, the purpose of the emission test was to determine the following:
• The concentrations and emission rates of speciated VOC in kiln stack gas.
• The concentrations and emission rates of semivolatile organic compounds in kiln stack
gas.
• The concentrations and emission rates of metals (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, cobalt, mercury, manganese, nickel, lead, antimony, and selenium) in kiln
stack gas.
• The concentration and emission rates of filterable PM-10 in the kiln stack, inlet and
outlet of the grinding/screening operation baghouse, and screening/grinding room air.
• The concentrations and emission rates of condensible PM, hydrochloric acid (HC1),
hydrogen fluoride (EOF7), chlorine (C12), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO^,
carbon dioxide (CO^, and carbon monoxide (CO) in the kiln stack gas.
• The concentrations and emission rates of TOC, methane, and ethane in the kiln stack
and dryer exhaust gas.
The test matrix is presented in Table 3-1, and the test schedule, including the date,
start time, and finish time of each test run is presented in Table 3-2.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-1. SAMPLING MATRIX FOR BELDEN BRICK PLANT 6a
Grinding Grinding
screening screening
fabric filter fabric filter
inlet outlet
Filterable PM 20 1 Ab 20 1 Ab
Filterable PM-10 201Ab 201Ab
Condensible PM
Metals/PM
Speciated VOC
Semivolatiles
HF/HCI/CI2/
Filterable PM
S02
NOX
CO
C02
TOC
Methane/ethane
Sieve size
Moisture
Ambient Process Kiln
samples samples stack
201 Ab
Hi-Vol 201 Ab
202b
29
0030C
0010C
26A
6C
7E
10
3A
25A
18
screening
gravimetric
Dryer
stack
25A
18
aTest method for each pollutant indicated; method number refers to EPA Reference
Method 40 CFR 60, unless otherwise noted.
b40 CFR 51, App. M.
cTest Methods for evaluating solid waste; physical/chemical methods; U. S. EPA Office of
Solid Waste, SW-846, November 1986.
3-2
-------
TABLE 3-2. BELDEN BRICK-TEST SCHEDULE
Location
Grinding/screening:
fabric filter inlet
Grinding/screening:
fabric filter outlet
Grinding/screening:
ambient-east
Grinding/screening:
ambient-west
Grinding/screening:
fabric filter hopper
Grinding/screening:
finished material
conveyor
Kiln stack
Kiln stack
Kiln stack
Kiln stack
Kiln stack
Kiln stack
Dryer stack
Analyte
Filterable PM- 10
Total PM
Process samples
Metals/filterable PM
VOC
Semivolatile
organics
TOC/NOx/CO/SO2/
methane/ethane
PM/HCI/C12/HF
filterable PM-IO/
condensible PM
TOC/methane/
ethane
Run
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
11/09/93
11/09/93
11/11/93
11/09/93
11/11/93
11/09/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
1 1/09/93
11/11/93
11/09/93
11/09/93
11/09/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/09/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/09/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
1 1/09/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
Start
930
1340
755
835
727
1200
800
1045
945
1230
700
700
929
1059
1214
845
1015
1130
1430
942
1553
1520
1550
1620
1650
1715
1745
1815
1430
942
1553
1035
1311
1527
1407
942
1553
1055
1459
1707
1035
1311
1527
Finish
1121
1440
855
1446
1427
1400
1000
1245
1145
1430
1515
1510
929
1059
1214
845
1015
1130
1915
1357
1947
1540
1610
1640
1710
1735
1805
1835
1915
1357
1947
1236
1511
1727
1917
1357
1947
1227
1642
1839
1236
1511
1727
Comments
Shutdown between 1609 and 1613
Sample No. 1067/1068
Sample No. 1069/1070
Sample No. 1071/1072
Sample No. 1073/1074
Sample No. 2067/2068
Sample No. 2069/2070
Sample No. 2071/2072
Shutdown between 1609 and 1613
Shutdown between 1410 and 1431
Shutdown between 1609 and 1613
3-3
-------
3.2 FIELD TEST CHANGES AND PROBLEMS
During implementation of the field test, some modifications to the test protocol
established in the site-specific test plan were warranted. The major changes are briefly
discussed in the following paragraphs.
The test plan indicated 24 points on two traverses would be used for the testing at the
grinding/screening baghouse inlet and outlet locations. However, Method 201A (PM-10 at
constant sampling rate) stipulates that no more than 12 sampling points be used. For this
reason, sampling was conducted using 12 points on a single traverse. In addition, because of
the low loadings at the baghouse outlet, the sampling time was extended for the second test
run. The sampling time was 6 hours for Run 1 and 7 hours for Run 2.
At the kiln outlet location the full 5x5 25-point sample point matrix was used for the
metals/particulate, semivolatile, and HCl/HF/particulate test runs. However, as noted above,
Method 201A stipulates that no more than 12 traverse points be used; therefore, for
Method 201 A, 2 traverses of 6 points each were used for a total of 12 sample points. Also,
at the kiln outlet location, different filter temperatures were maintained in the
metals/particulate and HCl/HF/particulate sample trains. The metals/particulate train
maintained a filter temperature of 250°F; this is the standard filter temperature for Reference
Method 5 for measuring filterable PM. As such, the metals/particulate train results represent
standard PM measurement methods/results. Due to some concern about the possibility of
sulfuric acid mist condensation on the filter, the HCl/HF/particulate sampling train used an
elevated filter temperature; the filter temperature was maintained at 350°F.
Three 2-hour runs were conducted for TOC, ethane, and methane using instrumental
analyzers at the dryer outlet location as stipulated in the test plan. However, no stack gas
volumetric flow measurements were taken during the first test run. This does not have any
impact on the measured concentrations; these data are needed to calculate emission rates
(Ib/hr) and emission factors (Ib/ton of brick produced). Since all three runs were conducted
on the same day, a flow rate for Run 1 can be estimated from the average of flow rates of
Runs 2 and 3; the measured flows for Runs 2 and 3 agreed closely.
During recovery of the semivolatile sampling trains, a black viscous material was
noted in and around the filter holders and glassware between the filter and resin trap;
discoloration of the filter frit also occurred. This situation had never been encountered
before and as a precaution the sample recovery washes from the filter frits were recovered
separately; the washes were dark in color. Some matrix effects were noted during analysis
of these washes (i.e., the analytical sensitivity was somewhat reduced). Nonetheless, no
significant concentration of the target compounds were found in these washes; the
concentrations were below detection limits and consequently have no impact on the reported
results.
3-4
-------
3.3 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
Tables 3-3 to 3-11 summarize the emission rates and emission factors determined
from the emission sampling and analysis. The following sections present the process data and
the results of the testing on the grinding/screening operation emissions, kiln emissions, and
dryer emissions, ambient samples, and process samples.
3.3.1 Process Operating Rates
This section summarizes the results of the measurements of process rates for the raw
material grinding/screening operation and the brick drying/firing operation during the
emission test. Appendix B presents the process data for the actual measurements made
during the emission test.
3.3.1.1 Grinding/screening operation. For the grinding/screening operation, the rate
of fine material production was measured by Belden personnel on November 9 and 11.
Table 3-12 summarizes these process rate measurements.
3.3.1.2 Unfired brick drying. Table 3-13 summarizes the process data for the
unfired brick dryer during the test period. The average feed rate for unfired bricks to the
dryer was determined to be 3.93 Mg/hr (4.33 ton/hr); the average production rate of unfired
bricks from the dryer was determined to be 3.36 Mg/hr (3.70 ton/hr).
3.3.1.3 Brick firing. Table 3-14 summarizes the process data for the kiln during the
emission test. The average feed rate for unfired bricks to the kiln was determined to be
3.36 Mg/hr (3.70 ton/hr); the average production rate of fired bricks from the kiln was
determined to be 3.16 Mg/hr (3.48 ton/hr).
3.3.2 Grinding/Screening Operation Emission Results
Emissions of filterable PM and PM-10 were sampled from the inlet and outlet of the
fabric filter that serves the clay processing line in the grinding/screening building. Ambient
PM-10 samples also were taken inside and to the east and west of the grinding/screening
building. In addition, the weight of material caught in the fabric filter was measured to
coincide with the fabric filter sampling. Table 3-3 summarizes the uncontrolled and
controlled emission rates and emission factors developed for this source, and Tables 3-15 to
3-17 summarize the emission data and results for the tests. The following paragraphs
describe the results of the sampling of these sources.
3-5
-------
en
en
3
xcov
•o
D
S
o
s
c-
13
*-»
CO
s
3?
s
o
CO
_o
.23
S
u
,_
.G
~£b
•^
of
CO
c
O
'0
1
>
13
c
-CO.
o
v->
O
CO
S3
H
05
W
S
fc
y
«
JS
.^
CN
d
vo
CN
d
CN
d
^.
CN
d
o
o
T— I
T-H
T-H
T-H
O
1
PH
3
CO
o
E
CS
co
t-;
t^.
CN
VO
VO
O
CN
VO
00
T-H
J^.
o
1
3
CO
t_
6 "S
W O
S
PH
W
nJ
PH
S
p
1
CO
PJ
K
<
fe
z
O
(— i
CO
CO x-v
^1 CO
*5 P-H
W 7
P H3
TESAN
fGLISH
^§
£ 0
25
^ ;§
M ^
5 o
w S
0 ^
C3
Lr
S
PH
0
CO
C?
S
G
Q
P<
O
P-:
O
£
§
>
CO
CO
CO
s
1
CO
^~*
"g
o
o
O-
|ca
0
CO
G
O
£
i-T
O
Q
CO
^-(
G
•~*
%
's
w
J^
£
2
CO
C
_g
t/3
M
S
u
M
CO
s
c
3
C
PH
U
CO
U
^jt
CO
CN
T-H
0
M
CO
^
CO
CN
T-H
o
_>,
"eO
G
CO
— <
i
CO
d
T-H
in
d
d
in
IO
d
S
CN
CN
rO
£N|
CN
o
PH
u
3
CO
U
E
V)
00
d
i — i
•0
ON
TJ-
VO
CO
•O
^
ON
O
""*
•Tt-
PH
U
3
CO
u,
O
E
H
d
§
O
FILTER
O
UH
T-H
T^
§
d
e
T-H
T-H
0
CN
o
d
1
d
<£•
**-'
|/^
"^f
d
CO
o
d
o
T— (
1^
PH
CO
U
E
CN
§
d
e
i
o
d
T — i
o
d
CN
CN
d
•£•
~~ — '
DO
d
VO
CN
d
PH
3
CO
E
ffi
u
H
U
PH
PH
PH
O
a
FILTER
O
h-H
ff\
i?
S
t-
1 — 1
Q
00
T-H
VO
T-H
co
T— 1
£•
^
^~
in
r-
CN
PH
13
^
^^
CN
S"
T-H
T-H
1-H
J^
,JC
"G"
o
rn
CN
-a
ca
ON
a\_
T-H
T-H
1-4
"c"
o
T-H
r^
t) t
o
s
CO
U-i
M
O
Ui
CL.
d>
CO
l-l
>
CO
° "S
"s i
"3 -?
CO T3
JO G
V5 O
52 o
2 g
CO §
G 0
•2 B
W O
CO JD
3-6
-------
00
t—I
00
>H
«
g
(—(
00
00
o
s
a
00
00
a
u
O
^
CXi
PH
O
>1
ao
00
-st'
m
S
CM
o
Z
"H.
CS
VI
ON
o\
o m CN cs
O O\ C4 T-H 00 ON
\OOVOrftSOOrHO
ro ON oo r-1 r-i oo
CMONC--OOOVOOO
VOOOO
Pv
00
r- CM o
\o O
Tfr
oo cs >— i CN
00 ^
ro o o rs *-H r- \o
43 JC J3 w> « w
W5 l/l c/3 O O U
« o u c 5 c
S 6 S
CRCooo
OOOOrJ-O
3-7
-------
^
JO
T)
O
O
3
T3
0
Q.
ts>
_o
'l~!
bO
"^
.H1
J_^
O
CO
t— i
c
_O
V5
'5
W
u-
U^
CO
C
.0
c/3
tsi
'E
W
c
Pi
1
c
Pi
1)
W)
ca
VH
(D
^f
^^
'
CN
o
o
pj
T-H
*/"}
.-^
u
( Cadmium (
00
ro
O
O
d
o
8
o
d
VO
t--
o
o
d
r-
o
o
d
CN
T-H
O
d
r<-,
so
d
•^t
CN
O
d
in
n
Cp
pj
00
(*^-
T-H
o
o
o
d
IO
o
W
10
f,
10
o
pj
10
00
^J.
(SJ
o
o
o
d
so
§
o
d
0
d
^
CN
O
0
o
d
1 Mercury
SO
f,
O
o
o
d
^t"
CN
O
d
f:
\,Q
o
d
r_
CN
O
O
o
o
10
T-H
T-H
o
o
d
t-
r-
o
o
o
d
0
8
o
o
d
r-
SO
O
d
| Manganese
T— t
CN
O
O
d
T^-
O
o
d
T-H
•^-
O
O
d
IO
00
o
o
J^.
*o
o
o
d
f,
§
d
T-H
o
d
^
CN
0
O
d
1
o
Z
IO
o
pj
ON
re
•0
o
pj
C-;
f:
IO
o
pj
CN
fi
IO
o
pj
Os
•3-
CN
T 1
O
O
o
d
CN
O
O
o
d
o
T-H
O
o
o
d
IO
o
o
o
d
T3
CS
<0
O
PJ
T 1
T 1
•o
o
pj
fl
SO
O
PJ
Os
SO
IO
Cp
pj
T-H
«o
o
PJ
f~i
IO
o
pj
P
IO
o
pj
CN
CN
IO
cp
pj
f.
^J-
s^*\
o
(Antimony)
00
T-H
§
O
d
so
CN
O
O
o
d
f:
T-H
O
d
so
T-H
O
o
o
o
00
IO
o
o
o
d
00
o
o
0
d
o
o
o
d
ON
T^-
O
o
0
d
cl
| Selenium (<
•d
D
0
u
OJ
"O
o
c
E
_3
^,
&
J3
•o
C
CO
'c
u
&o
<
s~-
ca
N .
•
i
PH
0
t
[j_(
Z
o
»— (
OO
00
HH
W
Q
Z
<**
CO
W
H
<,
Pi
Z
g
1
w
z
HH
HH
LU
0
Pi
1
CO
m'
TABLE 3-
S"1
s*— '
T3
8
T3
O
lH
P,
O
•c
O
•*->
t-T
o
o
ca
U-l
c
.0
'£?
'c
PJ
1 J
JC
•Q
if
ca
L*
n
.0
.52
W
c
3
C
3
Pi
aj
bO
ca
Ui
0
>
"*C
'
CN
o
o
o
o
d
oo
r-
o
o
o
d
^j.
CN
O
d
ON
IO
o
d
| Mercury
f,
|>^
d
Os
o
o
d
T-H
d
f*"i
^J*
o
o
d
IO
CN
O
o
d
^
T 1
O
O
d
^
^j-
o
o
d
m
T-H
d
in
o
T-H
O
d
>o
ON
O
O
d
ON
CN
O
d
Os
o
o
o
d
•a
o
o
W
>o
CN
IO
O
W
t-H
iy~j
o
W
r-
CN
in
o
W
f^.
in
o
W
00
00
IO
o
PJ
00
Tt'
IO
Cp
W
IO
ON
, — „
o
(Antimony
SO
d
o
d
T-H
IO
o
o
o
d
t-
CN
O
O
o
d
T-H
r<-,
O
O
d
f.
T-H
O
O
d
00
d
^
o\
o
d
T-H
0
O
d
't?
(Selenium (
•a
4~*
aj
4-»
-a
o
3
I1
•a c
M
•a E
o co
a. la
o '5
-------
-»
•a
8
3
•a
£
P
o
*U|
OJJ
sp
•^
t-T
O
CO
c
o
1
S
BJ
Ul
J3
.K
jj
co
Ui
e
o
-g
'§
3
CO
2
c
3
P£
C
t§
1)
CO
r-,
aj
>
CO
cs
r— t
"3
rj-
CO
§
d
o
r-H
d
^^
I
BJ
rf
1
O
0
r-(
8
d
CO
o
d
^
o
8
d
t—
o
^
K^
Chloromethanc
cs
§
d
rH
d
^T
g
BJ
ON
vo
o
O
g
1
d
r-H
d
^^
O
S
BJ
rH
CO
rH
8
o
Chloroethane
in
9
BJ
vo
rt
8
BJ
CO
0
1
BJ
T-l
H
8
BJ
CO
ON
rH
§
d
ts
r-H
O
d
in
o
i
cs
cs
ON
c5
d
n
| lodomethane (1
o
§
d
CO
rH
o
VO
Q
^5
d
00
in
o
0
^
8
d
Sr
8
d
o
cs
8
o
00
f~^
\ Acetone
o
BJ
H
9
BJ
to
8
1
BJ
VO
CN
in
CD
BJ
in
ts
8
BJ
r-
vd
>n
o
BJ
cs
in
o
BJ
cs
00
in
9
BJ
00
r-'
u
Carbon disulfic
r-l
r- 1
§
d
r-
d
j^J
d
m
cp
CO
in
in
CO
d
m
d
m
CO
d
C—
rH
o
d
1 2-Butanone
1
BJ
CO
cs
9
BJ
vq
2
B
i
BJ
CO
CO
BJ
cs
•*
VO
O
W
^
S
BJ
T— (
00
^^
o
9
C3
rH
in
o
BJ
CO
~*
u
ra
o
1 1,1,1-Trichloro
r-H
8
o
VO
Q
$5
d
cs
Q
^
>n
O
o
d
in
8
d
o>
S
d
o
o
d
j^.
8
d
| Benzene (b)
in
9
BJ
"*
i
rH
in
m
o
i
BJ
^
VO
O
W
^
T— (
8
d
r— (
d
i
o
VO
o
BJ
00
•*
2-Hexanone
VD
O
BJ
rH
i
C3
VO
O
BJ
ON
rH
O
r-
o
BJ
CO
cs
VO
o
BJ
^
8
BJ
m
vd
S
BJ
in
-y
'^^
r-
o
BJ
r--
u
u
| Tetrachloroeth
in
cp
oo
c-
m
O
BJ
ts
ON
in
o
1
BJ
00
9
BJ
o
vd
,n
|
d
ON
d
VO
ts
o
ON
rH
O
0
| Toluene
cp
BJ
cs
cs
8
BJ
r-
cs
8
1
i-H
cs
cp
BJ
00
^
in
o
BJ
p
in
o
BJ
VO
00
in
Cp
BJ
vo
vo
in
o
BJ
VO
in
[ Ethylbenzene
in
o
g
r-t
i
BJ
CO
in
o
W
ts'
VO
o
BJ
VO
in
in
Cp
BJ
ts
CO
0
BJ
rH
in
o
BJ
Tf
t~-
in
o
BJ
00
rH
U
oo
in
cp
^
CO
in
O
BJ
C3
m
O
1
BJ
CO
CO
9
c-^
r4
*— i
T-H
§
d
CO
rH
d
o
§
o
in
0
BJ
oo
u
_o
in
o
ON
cs
8
BJ
in
CO
in
o
1
BJ
0
CO
8
BJ
CO
cs
8
BJ
cs
ON
^
d
8
BJ
ON
in
0
BJ
c^-
u
1
^
6
WH
O
S
CL,
%
c
•^
vo
rH
co «5
i^ G
O 3
U -
2 «
% $
8 "
£ 1
^T3
c u
o ts
•0 C
w .5
CQ BJ
CO .O
o
u
CO
JS
U
o
3-9
-------
W
s
CO
8
CO
VO
W
ON
8
CN
od
00
IT)
W
CO
ON
10
W
2
w
co
NO
ON
VO
oo
(N
10
W
w
10
CO
ON
IO
cs
E
W
CN
VO
CN
>0
W
vo
CO
w
VO
>0
w
oo
VO
ON
vo
ON
VO
10
CN
VO
3-10
-------
03
s-^"
•o
O
T3
2
CX
%
•J3
s1
M
5<^
^
o
u
TO
C
•2
.53
E
UJ
1_!
H
u"
ca
C
_O
*V3
on
U
TO
s
C
3
DH
C
aj
-<^
ro
CN
,_
aj
rO
CM
,_
CJ
-S
f-l
3
~-~.
o
3
O
in
o
W
ro
•*
m
o
W
T-H
ro
m
o
W
00
•*
m
o
W
o
in
0
o
o
T-H
C
0
o
o
m
o
o
0
0
\o
T-H
o
o
o
o
o
c
43
Pi
m
o
W
•^r
CN
in
o
W
in
ro
in
o
W
00
T-H
in
0
W
00
1 '
m
U
m
r-
* — i
0
o
1 *
jn
UJ
m
in
W
co
in
CJ
c
CJ
M
O
"g
Q
"r"
•77
Q
^-
in
o
W
ro
rO
m
O
W
T-H
ro
in
q
W
•^r
^
in
q
W
CN
O
T-H
o
o
o
0
m
q
W
c--
ON
T-H
o
0
O
o
in
0
U
ro
^
^
;£,
G
CJ
— -
r-|
g.
z
8
w
oo
CN
m
o
W
CN
in
o
W
o
•*
in
o
W
00
*"""
m
0
W
o
ON
in
o
W
m
00
ro
T-H
O
O
0
0
in
q
W
co
m
c
la
•5
cx
c
-^^
^
1
CN
CM
0
O
o
in
o
U
in
"°
V>
O
W
Tf
00
0
CN
0
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
CN
o
o
o
o
r-
CM
o
o
0
0
-3-
^o
o
o
o
o
CJ
J^
1
43
CL
__
3J
Q
8
u
1 — 1
o
r-H
T-H
o
o
o
o
in
o
W
in
9
W
o
in
CM
CM
o
0
o
0
in
0
o
o
•o
T-H
0
0
0
VO
T-H
o
o
o
CJ
"^J
-C
r-;
c.
">-J
^*
3
1
c
1
5
o
W
ON
00
m
o
W
T-H
VO
q
W
o
00
o
W
r--
r-
m
q
W
00
CN
•n
o
W
ro
in
O
W
in
CN
in
0
W
•3-
CM
k
43
>^
J^|
TTl
1
n
u
_o
i_: u
3 ^^
O
43 G
s
CJ • ,
cx u "^
1||
~ "E. ^
E E g.
^ S CM
^ ^
15 0 o
jo "C ro
"o H ra
CJ ^/
&/3 X "^
2 o JS
v^ m jo
^o-o
ro ~ 0
— H ^, 43
° \J OJ
.y « E
r^ "7-- ^
o "2 o
l— CJ ' i
C 5J <£
o £ ~
"^ r- S
cj .E -S
C3 T3 J-"
JD C CX
o 1 f
o tu y
^ C -C
C "H -C
.— "^ CJ
. — f^ C_ix
r™ ^-^ ^r
UJ 2 «
ca 4D u
h^
h"H
^^
E
CO
h-H
O
2
W
00
W
i-4
H
<^
1
0
>-H
S
W
00
00
e
o
oo
00
5
^^H
W
Q
2
•^
00
W
H
c£
2
0
00
00
•^
W
2
2
^-M
UH
0
•v^
jfj
<
S
^^
D
00
t<
TABLE 3-
ca
T3
CJ
3
TD
O
CX
J2
v^M
O
o
O
JD
^
0
U
ca
t^H
C
_o
c/3
E
W
1— i
.C
"^.
—
CJ
ca
c
_o
V5
'E
(U
to
C\3
-«
c
3
PH
c
3
>
W
CN
T— 1
1
ro
CN
T-H
OJ
>^
1 Source/an;
m
o
W
\o
00
in
0
W
CO
VO
in
o
W
in
ON
0
T-H
O
o
o
o
ro
0
o
o
o
CN
CN
0
o
o
o
ro
O
0
o
0
in
ro
O
o
o
o
"o
c
4J
PH
in
o
W
00
^
8
W
o
F-
in
q
W
VO
ro
O
W
ro
r-
T-H
O
0
o
o
TH^
CM
O
0
o
o
CM
0
o
o
o
ro
0
o
o
0
aj
c
aj
N
C
CJ
JD
0
u<
_O
— ^
O
Q
i
-^
T-H
in
o
W
in
^0
m
0
W
CN
VO
8
w
00
00
in
q
W
••H^
ro
CM
O
0
o
0
T-H
(N
0
0
o
o
T 1
rO
O
o
0
0
VO
T-H
0
o
o
0
^
c
"ex
ca
2
in
o
W
t-
in
in
0
W
m
8
W
o
00
in
o
W
ro
O
CM
O
O
o
0
ON
T 1
0
o
o
o
00
CN
O
o
o
0
ro
0
o
o
o
aj
c
CJ
TO
43
•*-»
CX
TO
_c
>,
CJ
S
CN
S
O
o
o
ro
T — i
O
o
T-H
o
o
0
1 — 1
Tf
Q
o
o
CM
1
0
in
0
o
o
o
ON
in
o
0
o
0
CM
T-H
o
o
0
aj
"ca
43
CX
Q
rf
O
O
CN
O
o
o
o
o
T — 1
Q
o
o
o
8
o
00
0
o
0
o
VO
CO
o
o
o
o
in
CO
o
o
u
03
13
f~t
rl-H
4-»
CX
3
4D
C
Q
in
§
00
T-H
8
W
CN
CN
>n
o
W
VO
T-H
in
o
W
•n
T-H
in
o
W
CN
VO
in
o
W
VO
C"
in
0
W
n
o
W
CO
in
(U
4-1
*ff?
43
4— »
CX
4D
3
1
q
o
r-
§
o
00
T— I
o
^
o
ON
in
o
o
o
q
o
CO
T-H
q
o
VO
o
q
o
CN
9
O
s S
^
o
TO
"«
43
,2
CX
z?
u
4-1
V
CN
m
.
IH' Ul
O c
43 E
aj . "^
•o ^
flj ^J ^H
3 *U S
T3 "p, i-
2 S 8.
Q.J TO
wa CN
-2 ^ ^
o o o
*r~! •^-^ *^
4D t= CO
UH "^ •"
O " W
C CX C
2 o J3
00 *^ 4D
"*. 0 -o
CO ^ O
*" CN "S
^ TO E
TO ^at c!
>- c -S
% .2 -o
CJ -1
2 ^ £
^ -5 u
c o ^i
o E —
•a Z! 2
g .B -5
CO " O ^!?
4D C °-
52 o ^
O <+-* 5?
*"* JT>
Cd C *-^-*
c "TO 43
.2 -S u
•2 "Rci
W 2 S
TO 4D O
3-11
-------
^r^
yS/
T)
u
o
T3
o
1-1
a
0
'S
4P
.^j
bi>
•^
o
0
ca
tt^
G
'eS
's
w
t-.
"SZ,
jx!
of
03
C
.2
co
'B
G
^
c
CH
U
bO
ca
u
^
"ca
IO
r~l
f^
•
^
•
1—1
CN
rH
00
CN
CN
>O*
ON
co
CN
O
CO
>o
^st*
o
o
^o
0
,_,
IO
0
10
CO
o
,-J.
rH
vq
rH
vq
rH
rH
^_4
XI
o
2;
r-
I/-)
o
rH
to
O
ON
10
o
rH
O
00
vq
rH
ON
rH
ON
rH
O
u
o
ON
co
o
VO
co
0
00
CO
o
$
o
CN
CN^
rH
o
r-T
O
0
CN.
r-T
0
CM
"
CN
o
u
T— 1
^t"
o
O
rH
to
o
o
IO
CN
o
o
VO
cS
0
co
rH
o
VO
rH
o
ON
o
o
IO
rH
O
CJ
ca
•*_>
CJ
B
ca
U
O
CN
O
o
VO
co
0
o
(^
co
o
o
co
«0
o
o
co
T— 1
o
rH
rH
O
CN
rH
0
r-
T— {
C3
G
ca
,G
0)
S
^^-»
detectec
-*-»
0
c
CJ
C
ca
1
/ — s
CO
X .
CJ
CX
CJ
o
•a
o
ex
o
bO
vo
rH
co
*O
CJ
-*—»
ca
o
O
CX
c
o
CJ
00
ca
X)
CO
tH
O
•4-*
O
ca
CO
CO
'B
PJ
U
O
a
CO
O
y
|
o
o
§
1
CO
— j
K
O
\J
^*
fc
¥, w
O H
CO *Z*
CO g
S ffi
PJ CO
H-H
n j
2 5
< K
y^ \ /
p PJ
•^ ^
rr '^
^^ 1,1
2 P
O pq
CO ^
1 Q
PJ §
^-J,
3
2
0
SH
OH
^*
co
CN
rH
^_^
S
B
"«
O
co
co
co
co
co
CN
>0
rH
IO
rH
rH
10
rH
rH
00
CN
O
CO
rH
ON
O
O
O
rH
rH
O
rH
rH
r--
CO
CN
co
W)
CO
•0
co
«o
CN
s
z,
rH
rH
CO
rH
CN
rH
CN
rH
O
VO
CO
rH
"*
CN
O
u
o
^
o
CN
O
VO
o
co
DO
0
ON
CN"
0
CN
>0
CN"
o
IO
VO
CN"
0
o
ON
CN"
CN
O
U
rH
0
O
rH
O
o
>o
o
o
co
ON
o
o
oo
CN
c>
IO
CO
0
(^
rH
CD
CN
CO
o
CJ
c
ca
u
6
00
ca
U
^
00
o
o
CN
O
O
co
o
o
rH
rH
O
ON
CN
0
>0
CN
o
«o
CN
O
r-
co
o
CJ
G
ca
-*-»
CJ
,_;
D
O
•^
CJ
r-\
i-^
*a
CJ
o
O
O-,
oo
o
'C
(4-1
O
c
o
•*-*
00
CO
U-l
O
ej
ca
CJ
o
S
ex
c
0
•a
. u
13 ra
"SI o
UJ I*
T3 O
*-* t2
o
G C
f-^i
CJ .S
C J2
ca .S2
-B B
PJ PJ
3-12
-------
ON
oo
S
1?
T3
u
3
•o
O
a
J3
O
*U-i
b/i
S
.^
^
o
o
03
.O
1
PJ
UH
.C
•^
03
UH
C
.0
00
'S
PJ
c
3
PH
C
3
r^H
bJO
03
10
<
^^
Hj
CN
'""'
CJ
03
U
>
^^
r<"i
CN
T-H
"o3
C
T-H
CN
d
(N
CN
d
r-
r-H
o
CO
CN
d
NO
VO
d
ON
d
^
in
d
C^j
r^
d
2-
PH
3
03
U
E
r<->
CN
d
ro
rn
d
NO
T"H
o
i — i
CN
d
^
r-
d
rO
C5
T-5
O
in
d
r-
NO
d
^
PH
3
03
UH
E
in
T-H
d
^H
r— 1
d
NO
r-H
o
00
d
00
d
*n
fi
d
CN
•n
0
NO
in
d
T3
PH
3
03
E
f^
\Q
o
d
,_
^-
o
d
tf,
T~H
o
tf,
d
d
r_l
CN
d
c^l
r-H
d
o
"*
d
0
d
o
r-H
1
PH
3
03
U
E
NO
^j.
*
ND
T— 1
f —
T-H
ON
in
o
in
CN
in
S
PH
O
nd. inorgan:
o
U
NO
CN
d
CN
ON
O
d
tf,
T-H
O
^>
in
d
r-H
00
d
ON
CN
d
04
"*t
d
f--*
r-H
S
PH
nd. organic
o
U
00
in
•
c^
i — i
CN
CN
t^.
in
00
in
in
C3
PH
•d
c
o
{2
u
«3 U
UH V>
o1 2
•o So
E -°
t_i CN
0 ^
2 o
3 <0
'S »H
U
E ^
w 6
. (TJ ^j
0 C 4J
•C x; -"^H
03
£!:§
t-> CB ?
3 UH -0
T3 CJ y
O r* r *-•
OH VH
« .E Q_
•o 2 o
•c x .s
° P: X
3C *•"
^ <<"
t^ VO ON
0 ^ CN
u "a -a
•"-• O O
2 •£ J-i
to >^ >^<
, >,
-o "^
T3 3 3
d) O O
S ° t>
^ i §
W5 *-**-i
-11
.03 -1 t/i
Emission f
Measured
Measured
03 JD U
N ' V S N ,
u
OJ
•o
T-H
CN
O
7
O
t— <
CO
W
^
S
PH
O
^
<
I
CO
ON
PJ
S
03
•0
O
T3
0
UH
O-
.O
C
o
•*-J
X)
„
o
o
t2
.0
W
UH
.C
-
03
UH
C
O
1
PJ
C
3
PH
C
3
U
bO
03
UH
<;
r<~,
CN
T-H
-• o
u- •£
V3 ^
i) .2
UH ."tn
*
o -^
"8 o
W rtj
s |
S2 ^
2 1
u .E
O3 W5
Emission f
Measured
"^ £^
fcfl
u
03
UH
t-H
OJ
S
r^3 bX)
•- CN
fH C,
•I E
OJ
OH
3 Z-3
o 5
e ^
O3 "O
II
•Is
•o c
o
ure
Mea
Based
3-13
-------
s
•a
§
•o
o
a
£
ac
t^
^
O
ca
C
.23
W
t-i
S
U*"1
^— «
W
C
.2
*C/3
^
'e
u
e
3
a
j-H
3
**^
u
U)
rt
r+\
CM
CS
(
W)
2
^;
^
C^j
CS
IU
"ca
T— 1
C)
T-I
CJ
VO
T — i
0
in
r— 1
O
^
^-
CJ
Tf
O
o
>n
cJ
t^
c5
S
T— 1
O
1
^3
0
ON
00
8
o
o
1 — 1
o
o
o\
CS
o
o
o
C3
oo
o
C5
c'l
0
o
u
E
1
o
o
CS
£5^
^*
o
C£
g
o
o
s
o
8
o
1 — 1
CS
8
o
o
CS
o
o
o
CS
o
o\
T-I
8
o
CS
0
!_?
o
u
ex
T3
u
o
•o
o
Q.
1
0
tuO
l^>
VO
T— 1
^"
2
o
QJ
2
V5
o
o
c
o
•a
(U
JO
o
o
ca
c
'53
.23
E
1
I
1
83
J
o
B
u
„
0
E
^_
fT .
£jH
1
CO
rt
<;
Z
O
CO
CO
§
W
Q
2"
vJ
^<
W
F
o
>— 1
CO
CO
W
Z
^j
^5
UH
O
^^
i
i
2
CO
o
1
W
§
^
•o
CJ
o
•o
o
a
•8
JO
o
JD
*^-
o
tj
CO
U-l
e
.0
'53
"E
W
.
JS
£
of
CO
.g
'53
.23
S
W
c
K
C
u
CO
<5
rn
CS
^
u
ca
u
"^H
f'J
CS
1 '
u
i^
"«
o
m
C5
CS
0
CS
o
o
o
C3
1 — I
q
7—1
^""3
q
i-H
e
00
T"H
o
o
o
CJ
00
1 — 1
0
o
o
CS
o
o
m
E
C5
C3\
IT)
0
o
CS
C3
§
o
u
ffi
CO
1 — 1
8
o
CS
o
^o
T— 1
8
o
CS
o
o
t^
s
o
o
rn
o
§
o
o
CS
s
o
o
CS
u
t—
3
5
WH
•a
u
u
•a
0
i_
U-,
•^M
] !
XI
o
c
o
•*->
00
d
0
1)
2
fli
o
0
a,
c
o
•o
£3
o
o
CO
C
.O
.S3
E
W
3-14
-------
U
w
co
3
H
x— \
_f^
bO
fS
-M1
i-T
O
^— i
CO
C
O
'53
c/3
1
t-,
I
a
I-H
_o
W5
's
c
f^
I-M
C
PH
CO
I-H
CO
>
•^r
^
co
CM
(
o
5
>0
CO
c
ca
•~ j
O
E
CM
O
co
o
o
CM
O
ON
(M
O
VO
^ \
O
CO
r-
o
co
C5
T—l
ON
0
CO
CO
JZ
•*-»
co
I-H
CO
"a
TD
CO
_t-j
i
iO
S)
bO
•*-»
ca
u
OH
o
^
"7^
co
OH
O
(-H
OH
<4_l
O
co i~^
> 3
'^! O
C t-1
co *^
co ^
OH ^
CO 'C
In 13
*-• ...
o S3
c ^
ii o
3 > ! t
CO 0
*-• *5*
i S
'in <^~l
G'"1 co
*-"
co ca
% S
a o
•a S
bO OH
.S c
c o
.2 -a
3 g
Crrt
TO
3 ^("^
13 *-<
E 2
t/5 °
co t4-1
c c
3 -2
J2 S
ca E
o w
/ \ ' v
vS £^
PJ
co
PJ
CQ
m
CO
CM
o
o
a\
CM
co
00
co
cr\
o
0
00
Os
cs
en
r-
o
co
T3
-a
CO
ca
00
bO
.S
CO
a,
o
OH
O
a,
'-4-1
o
ca ~^
*-> I-H
C CO
CO O,
CO T3
£H ^
11
c
o
00
cs
00
CM
C3
CM
co
ca
U"
R
CO
C
ca
CO
c
ca
"5
_co U
'E -2
CO TO
'§ 8
T3 g
bO OH
.S c
C O
.2 -q
1 §
,„ o
C C
3 -2
in '~
ca E
O W
CO
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-12. SUMMARY OF PROCESS RATES FOR GRINDING/SCREENING
OPERATION
Description
Date
Start time
Finish time
No. of measurements
Minimum process rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr)
Maximum process rate, Mg/hr
(ton/hr)
Average process rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr)
11/9/93
7:52
12:14
17
37.9 (41.7)
41.2 (45.3)
39.2(43.1)
11/11/93
7:30
11:30
17
36.0 (39.6)
41.1 (45.2)
38.5 (42.3)
TABLE 3-13. SUMMARY OF DRYER PROCESS DATA
Date
11/9/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
Inlet
temperature,
°C(°F)
35 (95)
37.7 (100)
37.3 (100)
Outlet
temperature,
°C(°F)
132 (269)
129 (265)
134 (274)
Average
feed rate,
Mg/hr (ton/hr)
3.93 (4.33)
3.93 (4.33)
3.93 (4.33)
Average
production rate,
Mg/hr (ton/hr)
3.36 (3.70)
3.36 (3.70)
3.36 (3.70)
TABLE 3-14. SUMMARY OF KILN PROCESS DATA
Date
11/9/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
Inlet
temperature,
°C(°F)
41.1 (106)
51.1 (124)
60.0 (140)
Peak
temperature,
°C(°F)
1116(2040)
1116(2040)
1111 (2031)
Average
feed rate,
Mg/hr (ton/hr)
3.36 (3.70)
3.36 (3.70)
3.36 (3.70)
Average
production rate,
Mg/hr (ton/hr)
3.16(3.48)
3.16(3.48)
3.16(3.48)
Gas consumption
rate,
m3/hr (ft3/hr)
272 (9,607)
269 (9,500)
258 (9,120)
3-16
-------
TABLE 3-15. GRINDING/SCREENING AMBIENT PM-10 MEASUREMENTS
(METRIC UNITS)
Inside building
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Flow rate, ACM/min
Flow rate, DSCM/min
Mass collected, mg
Concentration, g/DSCM
1
11/09/93
10:42
12:45
120
1.186
1.198
321
0.00223
2
11/09/93
12:50
14:50
120
1.188
1.196
448
0.00312
Outside (East)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Flow rate, ACM/min
Row rate, DSCM/min
Mass collected, mg
Concentration, g/DSCM
1
11/09/93
12:00
14:00
120
1.169
1.173
8.5
6.04E-05
2
11/11/93
8:00
10:00
120
1.186
1.198
16.2
0.000113
3
11/11/93
10:45
12:45
120
1.188
1.196
9.8
6.83E-05
Outside (West)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Flow rate, ACM/min
Flow rate, DSCM/min
Mass collected, mg
Concentration, g/DSCM
1
11/11/93
9:45
11:45
120
1.186
1.198
30.1
0.000209
2
11/11/93
12:30
14:30
120
1.188
1.196
26.3
0.000183
Average
0.00268
8.04E-05
0.000196
3-17
-------
TABLE 3-15. GRINDING/SCREENING AMBIENT PM-10 MEASUREMENTS
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Inside building
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Flow rate, ACFM
Flow rate, DSCFM
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
1
11/09/93
10:42
12:45
120
41.87
42.32
4.9537
0.000975
2
11/09/93
12:50
14:50
120
41.94
42.23
6.9135
0.00136
Outside (East)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Row rate, ACFM
Flow rate, DSCFM
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
1
11/09/93
12:00
14:00
120
41.30
41.42
0.1312
2.64E-05
2
11/11/93
8:00
10:00
120
41.87
42.32
0.2500
4.92E-05
3
11/11/93
10:45
12:45
120
41.94
42.23
0.1512
2.98E-05
Outside (West)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Flow rate, ACFM
Flow rate, DSCFM
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
1
11/11/93
9:45
11:45
120
41.87
42.32
0.4645
9.15E-05
2
11/11/93
12:30
14:30
120
41.94
42.23
0.4059
8.01E-05
Average
0.00117
3.52E-05
8.58E-05
3-18
-------
TABLE 3-16. GRINDING/SCREENING EMISSION TEST RESULTS--
FABRIC FILTER INLET FILTERABLE PM, PM-10 (METRIC UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
9:30
11:21
111
94.5
1.497
1.498
2
11/09/93
13:40
14:40
60
97
0.785
0.765
3
11/11/93
7:55
8:55
60
97.8
0.774
0.778
Average
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, M/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
15
21
0
1.5
905
593.9
578.8
18
21
0
1.5
909
596.5
576.3
13
21
0
1.5
902
591.8
580.9
FILTERABLE PM-10
Mass collected, g
Concentration, g/DSCM
FILTERABLE PM
Mass collected, g
Concentration, g/DSCM
0.4604
0.307
4.5862
3.061
0.234
0.306
4.1066
5.366
0.2242
0.288
0.300
4.5845
5.895
4.77
TABLE 3-16. (ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
9:30
11:21
111
94.5
52.878
52.915
2
1 1/09/93
13:40
14:40
60
97.0
27.738
27.028
3
11/11/93
7:55
8:55
60
97.8
27.347
27.464
Average
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
59
21
0
1.5
2,967
20,974
20,439
64
21
0
1.5
2,980
21,065
20,351
55
21
0
1.5
2,957
20,899
20,513
FILTERABLE PM-10
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
FILTERABLE PM
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
7.10
0.134
70.8
1.34
3.61
0.134
63.4
2.34
3.46
0.126
0.131
70.7
2.58
2.09
3-19
-------
TABLE 3-17. GRINDING/SCREENING EMISSION TESTS RESULTS--
FABRIC FILTER OUTLET FILTERABLE PM, PM-10, (METRIC UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
8:38
14:46
350
92.1
5.153
4.968
2
11/11/93
7:27
14:27
420
91.1
6.057
5.849
Average
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
14
21
0
1.5
1,455
755
740
13
21
0
1.5
1,438
746
734
FILTERABLE PM-10
Mass collected, g
Concentration, g/DSCM
0.0027
0.000543
0.0027
0.000462
0.000503
FILTERABLE PM
Mass collected, g
Concentration, g/DSCM
0.0133
0.00268
0.0109
0.00186
0.00227
TABLE 3-17. (ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
8:38
14:46
350
92.1
181.97
175.437
2
11/11/93
7:27
14:27
420
91.1
213.913
206.567
Average
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
58
21
0
1.5
4,773
26,656
26,140
56
21
0
1.5
4,716
26,337
25,925
FILTERABLE PM-10
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
0.0417
0.00024
0.0417
0.00020
0.000220
FILTERABLE PM
Mass collected, gr
Concentration, gr/DSCF
0.2052
0.00117
0.1682
0.000814
0.000992
3-20
-------
3.3.2.1 Ambient sampling. Ambient Hi-Vol PM-10 samplers were set up in three
locations: inside the grinding/screening building, east of the building and west of the
building. At the inside and east locations, three runs were conducted, and at the west
location two runs were conducted. The data for these runs are summarized in Table 3-15.
Ambient PM-10 concentrations averaged 0.0027 g/DSCM (0.0012 gr/DSCF) inside,
0.000080 g/DSCM (0.000035 gr/DSCF) east of the building, and 0.00020 g/DSCM
(0.000086 gr/DSCF) west of the building.
3.3.2.2 Fabric filter inlet PM and PM-10. Uncontrolled filterable PM-10 emissions
from the grinding/screening operation were measured at the fabric filter inlet using
Method 201 A. The sampling train cyclone catch was also quantified in order to estimate the
filterable PM emissions from the source. Three runs were conducted. The data for these
runs are summarized in Table 3-16. Filterable PM-10 concentrations ranged from
0.029 g/DSCM (0.13 gr/DSCF) to 0.031 (0.13 gr/DSCF)and averaged 0.30 g/DSCM
(0.13 gr/DSCF). The average emission rate and emission factors for filterable PM-10
emissions from the source were 10 kg/hr (23 Ib/hr) and 0.27 kg/Mg (0.53 Ib/ton). Filterable
PM concentrations ranged from 3.1 g/DSCM (1.3 gr/DSCF) to 5.9 (2.6 gr/DSCF)and
averaged 4.8 g/DSCM (2.1 gr/DSCF). The average emission rate and emission factors for
filterable PM emissions from the source were estimated to be 170 kg/hr (370 Ib/hr) and
4.2 kg/Mg (8.5 Ib/ton).
3.3.2.3 Fabric filter outlet PM and PM-1Q. Controlled filterable PM-10 emissions
from the grinding/screening operation were measured at the fabric filter outlet using
Method 201 A. The sampling train cyclone catch was also quantified in order to estimate the
filterable PM emissions from the source. Because of the length of time required to collect an
adequate sample for analysis, only two runs were conducted. The data for these runs are
summarized in Table 3-17. Filterable PM-10 concentrations were 0.00054 g/DSCM
(0.00024 gr/DSCF) and 0.00046 (0.00020 gr/DSCF)and averaged 0.00050 g/DSCM
(0.00022 gr/DSCF). The average emission rate and emission factors for filterable PM-10
emissions from the source were 0.022 kg/hr (0.049 Ib/hr) and 0.00057 kg/Mg
(0.0011 Ib/ton). Filterable PM concentrations were 0.0027 g/DSCM (0.0012 gr/DSCF) and
0.0019 g/DSCM (0.00081 gr/DSCF) and averaged 0.0023 g/DSCM (0.00099 gr/DSCF).
The average emission rate and emission factors for filterable PM emissions from the source
were 0.10 kg/hr (0.22 Ib/hr) and 0.0026 kg/Mg (0.0052 Ib/ton).
3.3.2.4 Fabric filter inlet mass balance. Prior to the start of testing on the
grinding/screening operation, the fabric filter hopper was emptied; during the test the hopper
contents were weighed periodically. On the first day of testing (November 9),
2,513 kilograms (kg) (5,540 Ib) of material were collected by the fabric filter over a period
of 8.25 hours, and on the second day of testing (November 11), 2,794 kg (6,160 Ib) of
material were collected over 8.17 hours. These data indicate collection rates of 305 kg/hr
(672 Ib/hr) and 343 kg/hr (754 Ib/hr), respectively. As shown in Table 3-3, the emission
factor estimated from the fabric filter hopper catch is approximately twice the filterable PM
emission factor determined from the Method 201A test results. One possible explanation for
this discrepancy could be that the contribution of PM emissions from the two inlet ducts that
3-21
-------
were not sampled were significantly higher than expected. A more likely explanation is that
sloughing of the fabric filter cake material occurred during the sampling and biased the
results of the hopper catch high.
3.3.3 Grinding/Screening Operation Process Sample Analysis
Samples of fine clay material, which is the product of the grinding/screening process,
were collected for sieve and moisture analysis during each day of sampling on the
grinding/screening operation. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 3-4.
The moisture content of the finished materials averaged 4.34 percent on November 9 and
3.52 on November 11. The overall average moisture content of the material was
3.93 percent. The silt content of the finished material, corresponding to the amount of
material that passes a 200 mesh sieve, averaged 15.6 percent on November 9 and
18.1 percent on November 11. The overall average silt content of the material was
16.9 percent. As would be expected the drier material (sampled November 11) has a higher
silt content. The detailed results of the analysis of the process samples are provided in
Appendix C.
3.3.4 Kiln Emission Results
Emissions from the kiln were sampled for the following pollutants: metals, speciated
VOC, speciated semivolatile organic compounds, inorganic gases (SO2, NOX, CO, CO2),
TOC, filterable PM and PM-10, condensible PM, HF, HC1, and Cl2.~The following
paragraphs summarize the results of the sampling conducted on the kiln.
3.3.4.1 Metals. Emissions from the kiln stack were sampled using Method 29 for
11 metals: arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, mercury, manganese, nickel,
lead, antimony, and selenium. Table 3-5 summarizes the emission rates and emission factors
for metal emissions from the kiln, and Table 3-18 summarizes the sampling data and
concentrations of metals hi the exhaust stream. The results are presented in Table 3-18 as
the blank corrected sum of the front and back half fractions for each metal. Arsenic and
beryllium were not detected; the other metals were found in trace quantities in the samples.
Nickel, chromium, and manganese had the highest emission rates among the metals
quantified. For five of the metals (cadmium, cobalt, lead, antimony, and selenium),
background concentrations represented a significant portion of the total amounts quantified.
The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for metals are provided in Appendix C.
3.3.4.2 Speciated VOC. Emissions samples from the kiln stack were analyzed using
Method 0030 (VOST) for 47 VOC, of which 19 were detected in at least two of the three
test runs. Table 3-6 summarizes the emission rates and emission factors for speciated VOC
emissions from the kiln, and Table 3-19 summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of
VOC in the exhaust stream. The results are presented in Table 3-19 as the blank-corrected
sum of the Tenax and Tenax/charcoal fractions for one pair of sample traps for each
compound for each of the three test runs. It should be noted that the data for chloromethane,
bromomethane, iodomethane, methylene chloride, and benzene are considered estimates.
3-22
-------
TABLE 3-18. KTLN EMISSION TESTS RESULT
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
92.7
2.891
2.809
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
99.3
3.724
3.594
'S-METALS
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
99.5
2.990
2.867
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
221
17.6
2.2
4.4
354
1,055
587
221
18.4
1
4.3
422
1,259
701
224
17.8
1.7
4.7
339
1,012
557
MASS COLLECTED, ug (BLANK CORRECTED)
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium (a)
Chromium
Cobalt (a)
Mercury
Manganese
Nickel
Lead (a)
Antimony (a)
Selenium (a)
<1.97
<0.034
4.06
436
6.6
21.4
53.6
215
12.3
3.43
39.2
<1.96
<0.034
7.87
2084
27.2
9.66
175.2
1136
8.77
1.92
37.2
<1.97
< 0.034
1.40
544
11.33
30.5
65.8
371
10.1
3.42
69.6
CONCENTRATION, ug/DSCM
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium (a)
Chromium
Cobalt (a)
Mercury
Manganese
Nickel
Lead (a)
Antimony (a)
Selenium (a)
ND
ND
1.45
155
2.35
7.63
19.1
76.5
4.38
1.22
14.0
ND
ND
2.14
567
7.39
2.63
47.6
309
2.38
0.522
10.1
ND
ND
0.49
190
3.95
10.6
22.9
129
3.52
1.19
24.3
(METRIC L
Average
1.36
304
4.56
6.97
29.9
172
3.43
0.979
16.1
ND = not detected.
(a) Background corrections represent a significant portion of total amounts measured.
3-23
-------
TABLE 3-18. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-METALS (ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, rain
% isokinetic
Sample, volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
92.7
102.1
99.2
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
99.3
131.5
126.9
3
L_ 11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
99.5
105.6
101.3
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
429
17.6
2.2
4.4
1,160
37,260
20,713
429
18.4
1
4.3
1,385
44,462
24,738
435
17.8
1.7
4.7
1,113
35,729
19,683
MASS COLLECTED, gr (BLANK CORRECTED)
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium (a)
Chromium
Cobalt (a)
Mercury
Manganese
Nickel
Lead (a)
Antimony (a)
Selenium (a)
<7.2E-05
<1.4E-06
6.27E-05
0.00673
0.000102
0.000331
0.00082703
0.00332
0.000190
5.29E-05
0.000605
<7.2E-05
<1.4E-06
0.000121
0.03216
0.000420
0.000149
0.00270
0.0175
0.000135
2.96E-05
0.000574
<7.2E-05
<1.4E-06
2.15E-05
0.00840
0.000175
0.000471
0.00101
0.0057
0.000156
5.28E-05
0.001075
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium (a)
Chromium
Cobalt (a)
Mercury
Manganese
Nickel
Lead (a)
Antimony (a)
Selenium (a)
ND
ND
6.32E-07
6.78E-05
1.03E-06
3.34E-06
8.34E-06
3.34E-05
1.91E-06
5.34E-07
6.10E-06
ND
ND
9.35E-07
0.00025
3.23E-06
1.15E-06
2.08E-05
0.00013
1.04E-06
2.28E-07
4.42E-06
ND
ND
2.13E-07
8.30E-05
1.73E-06
4.65E-06
l.OOE-05
5.65E-05
1.54E-06
5.21E-07
1.06E-05
Average
5.93E-07
0.00013
1.99E-06
3.04E-06
1.31E-05
7.49E-05
1.50E-06
4.28E-07
7.04E-06
ND = not detected.
(a) Background corrections represent a significant portion of total amounts
measured.
3-24
-------
TABLE 3-19. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-SPECIATED VOC
(METRIC UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/11/93
15:50
16:10
20
0.0200
0.01996
2
11/11/93
16:50
17:10
20
0.0200
0.02012
3
11/11/93
17:45
18:05
20
0.0200
0.02017
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
204
17.6
2.2
5.5
351
1,048
614.8
207
17.6
2.2
4.9
321
958.1
541.0
209
17.6
2.2
4.2
327
975.1
552.0
MASS, ng (BLANK CORRECTED)
Chloromethane (a)
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane (a)
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane (a)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride (a)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
1475.956
1132.853
159.293
993.771
42.116
90.74
7.106
88.518
1.9 (b)
13.875
1261.417
51.006
216.682
0.650 (b)
192.644
368.637
74.476
2543.338
25.523
330.505
4.913
3-25
-------
TABLE 3-19
(METRIC
(continued)
UNITS)
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene (d)
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Bromofonn
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
2522.718
2.6
0.40 (b)
103.442
30.577
9.654
46.992
39.935
4337.655
145.766
3.65
159.558
41.073
46.172
64.574
58.095
1184.394
98.485
3.944
176.358
52.656
2.492
77.281
66.438
CONCENTRATION, ug/DSCM
Chloromethane (a)
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane (a)
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane (a)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride (a)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1, l-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
73.93
56.74
7.98
49.78
2.11
4.55
0.356
4.40
0.094 (b)
0.690
62.70
2.54
10.77
0.0323 (b)
9.55
18.28
3.69
126.10
1.27
16.39
0.244
Average
29.29
25.04
4.12
79.53
1.97
10.57
0.211
3-26
-------
TABLE 3-19 (continued).
(METRIC UNITS)
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene (c)
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
126.36
0.130
0.020 (b)
5.18
1.53
0.484
2.35
2.00
215.60
7.25
0.181
7.93
2.04
2.29
3.21
2.89
58.72
4.88
0.196
8.74
2.61
0.124
3.83
3.29
133.56
4.09
0.132
7.29
2.06
0.967
3.13
- 2.73
(a) Estimated for all runs.
(b) Based on one-half detection limit.
(c) Minimum concentration; sample concentrations exceeded calibration range of instrument.
3-27
-------
TABLE 3-19. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS--SPECIATED VOC
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/11/93
15:50
16:10
20
0.7063
0.7050
2
11/11/93
16:50
17:10
20
0.7063
0.7105
3
11/11/93
17:45
18:05
20
0.7063
0.7122
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
400
17.6
2.2
5.5
1,152
37,001
21,711
405
17.6
2.2
4.9
1,054
33,836
19,104
409
17.6
2.2
4.2
1,072
34,435
19,493
MASS, gr (BLANK CORRECTED)
Chloromethane (a)
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane (a)
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane (a)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride (a)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1-Tr ichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-ChIoroethyl vinyl ether
2.28E-05
1.75E-05
2.46E-06
1.53E-05
6.50E-07
1.40E-06
1.10E-07
1.37E-06
2.93E-08 (b)
2.14E-07
1.95E-05
7.87E-07
3.34E-06
l.OOE-08 (b)
2.97E-06
5.69E-06
1.15E-06
3.92E-05
3.94E-07
5.10E-061
7.58E-08
3-28
-------
TABLE 3-19 (continued).
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene (c)
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
3.89E-05
4.01E-08
6.17E-09 (b)
1.60E-06
4.72E-07
1.49E-07
7.25E-07
6.16E-07
6.69E-05
2.25E-06
5.63E-08
2.46E-06
6.34E-07
7.13E-07
9.97E-07
8.97E-07
1.83E-05
1.52E-06
6.09E-08
2.72E-06
8.13E-07
3.85E-08
1.19E-06
1.03E-06
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Chloromethane (a)
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane (a)
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane (a)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride (a)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-DichIoroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
3.23E-05
2.48E-05
3.49E-06
O.OOE+00
2.18E-05
9.22E-07
1.99E-06
1.56E-07
1.92E-06
4.13E-08 (b)
3.01E-07
O.OOE+00
2.74E-05
1.11E-06
4.71E-06
1.41E-08 (b)
4.17E-06
7.99E-06
1.61E-06
O.OOE+00
5.51E-05
5.53E-07
7.16E-06
1.06E-07
Average
1.28E-05
1.09E-05
1.80E-06
O.OOE+00
3.48E-05
8.61E-07
4.62E-06
9.20E-08
3-29
-------
TABLE 3-19 (continued).
(ENGLISH UNITS)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene (c)
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
5.52E-05
5.69E-08
8.76E-09 (b)
2.26E-06
6.69E-07
2.11E-07
1.03E-06
8.74E-07
9.42E-05
3.17E-06
7.93E-08
3.47E-06
8.92E-07
l.OOE-06
1.40E-06
1.26E-06
2.57E-05
2.13E-06
8.55E-08
3.82E-06
1.14E-06
5.40E-08
1.67E-06
1.44E-06
5.84E-05
1.79E-06
5.78E-08
3.18E-06
9.01E-07
4.23E-07
1.37E-06
1.19E-06
(a) Estimated for all runs.
(b) Based on one-half detection limit.
(c) Minimum concentration; sample concentrations exceeded calibration range of instrument.
3-30
-------
The results of the analysis for these compounds are discussed in Section 5.3 of this report.
The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for VOC are provided in Appendix C. The
results reported in Tables 3-6 and 3-19 are only for those compounds that were detected on
at least two of the three test runs. In such cases, the mass collected was assumed to be
one-half the detection limit for those compounds. In addition, a few compounds were
detected in the Tenax trap only in one run, for the Tenax/charcoal trap only in another run,
and in neither trap in the remaining run. Those compounds also are not reported in
Tables 3-6 and 3-19. Appendix C, Section 4.5 includes tables listing the detection limits,
and the raw and blank-corrected data for the Tenax and Tenax/charcoal traps for each of the
VOST runs.
3.3.4.3 Semivolatile organic compounds. Emissions samples from the kirn stack
were analyzed using Method 0010 (semi-VOST) for 72 semivolatile organic compounds, of
which 8 were detected in at least two of the three test runs. Table 3-7 summarizes the
emission rates and emission factors for speciated semivolatile organic compound emissions
from the kiln, and Table 3-20 summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of these
compounds in the exhaust stream. The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for
semivolatile compounds are provided in Appendix C.
3.3.4.4 Inorganic gases. Kiln emissions were monitored continuously for SO2, NOX,
CO, and CO2. Table 3-8 summarizes the emission rates, and emission factors for emissions
of these compounds and Table 3-21 summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of
these compounds in the exhaust stream. The detailed results of the sampling and analysis are
provided in Appendix C.
Emissions of SO2 were monitored using Method 6C. The concentrations of SC^ in
the kiln exhaust ranged from 39 to 61 ppm and averaged 53 ppm. The average emission rate
and emission factors for SO2 emissions were determined to be 4.8 kg/hr (11 Ib/hr) and
1.5kg/Mg(3.01b/ton).
Emissions of NOX were monitored using Method 7E. The concentrations of NOX in
the kiln exhaust ranged from 16 to 26 ppm and averaged 22 ppm. The average emission rate
and emission factors for NOX emissions were determined to be 1.4 kg/hr (3.2 Ib/hr) and
0.45 kg/Mg (0.91 Ib/ton).
Emissions of CO were monitored using Method 10. The concentrations of CO in the
kiln exhaust ranged from 42 to 49 ppm and averaged 45 ppm. The average emission rate
and emission factors for CO emissions were determined to be 1.8 kg/hr (4.0 Ib/hr) and
0.57 kg/Mg (1.1 Ib/ton).
Emissions of CO2 were monitored using Method 3A. The concentrations of CC^ in
the kiln exhaust ranged from 1.9 to 2.0 percent and averaged 2.0 percent. The average
emission rate and emission factors for CO2 emissions were determined to be 1,200 kg/hr
(2,700 Ib/hr) and 390 kg/Mg (770 Ib/ton).
3-31
-------
TABLE 3-20. KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-SEMIVOLATTLES
(METRIC UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
94.8
3.004
2.891
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.5
2.966
2.S44
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
3.294
3.136
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACMM
Flowrate, DSCMM
223
17.8
2.2
4.3
354
1,055
584.3
220
18.8
1.8
4.3
329
982.8
547.2
220
17.8
2.2
4.8
366
1,091
598.0
MASS COLLECTED, ug
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-ChIorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphcnol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-DichIorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzcnc
Naphthalene (a)
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobuiadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.8
<2
r <2
2.1
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
6
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.9
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
12
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
8.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
9.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
623
<2
<2
<2
<2
8.5
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
3-32
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(METRIC UNITS)
MASS COLLECTED, ug
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylcne
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (b)
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
4.8
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
53
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
13
<2
<2
<2
2
<2
<2
<2
77
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
11
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
23
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
14
<2
<2
<2
2.2
<2
<2
<2
240
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
7.4
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
18
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
31
<2
<2
<2
3
<2
<2
<2
510
10
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
3-33
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(METRIC UNITS)
CONCENTRATION, ug/DSCM
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene (a)
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
4.50
1.66
0.726
2.08
1.66
4.57
1.72
4.22
3.87
2.77
3.09
199
2.71
2.36
Ave.
3.95
2.16
3.00
2.63
3-34
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(METRIC UMTS)
CONCENTRATION, ug/DSCM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (b)
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)nuoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno ( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
18.3
4.50
0.692
26.6
8.09
4.92
0.774
84.4
5.74
9.88
0.957
162.6
3.2
Ave.
10.7
6.43
0.807
91.2
(a) Naphthalene found in method blank at 25 to 50 percent of sample level.
(b) Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate found in method blank at 3 to 22 percent of sample level.
3-35
-------
TABLE 3-20. KILN EMISSION TEST RESULTS-SEMIVOLATILES
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
94.8
106.077
102.084
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.5
104.759
100.421
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
116.333
110.755
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
433
17.8
2.2
4.3
37,260
20,635
428
18.8
1.8
4.3
34,708
19,325
428
17.8
2.2
4.8
38,537
21,118
MASS COLLECTED, gr
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
13-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
4-MethyIphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene (a)
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2.01E-04
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
7.41E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
3.24E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
9.26E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
2.01 E-04
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
7.56E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000185
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
< 3. IE-OS
<3.1E-05
1.34E-04
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
1.50E-04
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00961
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000131
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
3-36
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(ENGLISH UNITS)
MASS COLLECTED, gr
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Dicthyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo (a)an th racene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (b)
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno ( l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
7.41E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000818
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000201
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
3.09E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00119
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00017
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000355
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000216
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
3.40E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00370
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00011
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000278
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.000478
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
4.63E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
0.00787
0.00015
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
<3.1E-05
3-37
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(ENGLISH UNITS)
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene (a)
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
1.97E-06
7.26E-07
3.17E-07
9.07E-07
7.26E-07
2.00E-06
7.53E-07
1.84E-06
1.69E-06
1.21E-06
1.35E-06
8.68E-05
1.1SE-06
1.03E-06
Ave.
1.73E-06
9.43E-07
1.31E-06
1.15E-06
3-38
-------
TABLE 3-20. (continued)
(ENGLISH UNITS)
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (b)
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
8.01E-06
1.97E-06
3.02E-07
1.16E-05
3.53E-06
2.15E-06
3.38E-07
3.69E-05
2.51E-06
4.32E-06
4.18E-07
7.11E-05
1.4E-06
Ave.
4.68E-06
2.81E-06
3.53E-07
3.99E-05
(a) Naphthalene found in method blank at 25 to 50 percent of sample level.
(b) Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate found in method blank at 3 to 22 percent of sample level.
3-39
-------
TABLE 3-21. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-INORGANIC GASES
(METRIC UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACMM
Flowrate, DSCMM
193
17.6
2.2
4.1
351
1,048
614.8
204
17.6
2.2
5.5
321
958.1
541.0
209
17.6
2.2
4.2
327
975.1
552.0
CONCENTRATION, ppm (a)
SO2
NOx
CO
CO2 (b)
39.1
15.8
44.5
1.9
60.5
25.7
49.0
2.0
59.0
25.0
41.9
1.9
Average
52.9
22.2
45.1
2.0
(a) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(b) Concentration in percent.
TABLE 3-21. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-INORGANIC GASES
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, f t/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
380
17.6
2.2
4.1
1,152
37,001
21,711
400
17.6
2.2
5.5
1,054
33,836
19,104
409
17.6
2.2
4.2
1,072
34,435
19,493
CONCENTRATION, ppm (a)
SO2
NOx
CO
CO2 (b)
39.1
15.8
44.5
1.9
60.5
25.7
49.0
2.0
59.0
25.0
41.9
1.9
Average
52.9
22.2
45.1
2.0
(a) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(b) Concentration in percent.
3-40
-------
3.3.4.5 TOG, methane, and ethane. Kiln emissions were monitored continuously for
TOC emissions and semicontinuously for emissions of methane and ethane. Table 3-8
summarizes the emission rates and emission factors for emissions of these gases from the
kiln, and Table 3-22 summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of these gases in the
exhaust stream.
Emissions of TOC were monitored using Method 25A. The concentrations of TOC in
the kiln exhaust ranged from 1.3 to 2.5 ppm and averaged 2.0 ppm as propane. When
converted to a methane basis, the TOC concentrations ranged from 3.8 to 7.5 ppm and
averaged 5.9 ppm. The average emission rate and emission factors for TOC emissions were
determined to be 0.13 kg/hr (0.28 Ib/hr) and 0.041 kg/Mg (0.081 Ib/ton) as methane. The
as-methane results are reported in Tables 3-8 and 3-22. These data indicate that essentially
all TOC emissions measured from the kiln were methane.
Emissions of methane and ethane were measured using Method 18. Ethane was not
detected in the exhaust stream; the emission rates and emission factors for methane emissions
from the kiln are presented in Table 3-8. Table 3-22 summarizes the sampling data and
concentrations of methane in the exhaust stream. Methane averaged 5.8 ppm and the
average emission rate and emission factor for methane emissions from the kiln were
0.13 kg/hr (0.29 Ib/hr) and 0.042 kg/Mg (0.084 Ib/ton), respectively.
3.3.4.6 Filterable PM. filterable PM-10. and condensible PM. Emissions from the
kiln were sampled for filterable PM using three sampling trains, filterable PM-10, and
condensible PM. Table 3-9 summarizes the emission rates and emission factors for PM
emissions from the kiln, and Table 3-23 summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of
PM in the exhaust stream. The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for these
pollutants are provided in Appendix C.
Emissions of filterable PM were measured in conjunction with the Method 26A
sampling train (HF, HC1, and C^). The front half of the Method 29 sampling train (metals)
also was analyzed for filterable PM. Methods 26A and 29 were run simultaneously on
November 9-10. Finally, filterable PM was measured in conjunction with the Method 201A
PM-10 train; Method 201A runs were conducted on November 11. The average emission
rates for the three runs of each sampling train were consistent; for the Method 26A tram,
filterable PM emissions averaged 0.66 kg/hr (1.4 Ib/hr); for the Method 29 train, the average
filterable PM emission rate was determined to be 0.74 kg/hr (1.6 Ib/hr); and for the
Method 201A sampling train, the average filterable PM emission rate was 0.48 kg/hr
(1.1 Ib/hr). The average emission factors for filterable PM emission as measured by the
same three sampling trains were 0.21 kg/Mg (0.42 Ib/ton), 0.23 kg/Mg (0.47 Ib/ton), and
0.15 kg/Mg (0.30 Ib/ton), respectively.
Filterable PM-10 and condensible PM emissions were measured using a combination
Method 201A/202 sampling train. Table 3-9 summarizes the emission rates and emission
factors for these compounds, and Table 3-23 summarizes the sampling data and
concentrations of these compounds in the exhaust stream. The average emission rates for
3-41
-------
TABLE 3-22. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-TOG, METHANE/ETHANE
(METRIC UNITS')
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
193
17.6
2.2
4.1
351
1,048
614.8
204
17.6
2.2
5.5
321
958.1
541.0
209
17.6
2.2
4.2
327
975.1
552.0
CONCENTRATION, ppm
TOC, as propane (a)
TOC, as methane (a)
Methane (b)
Ethane
2.1
6.2
6.8
<3
1.3
3.8
5.3
<3
2.5
7.5
5.1
<3
Average
2.0
5.9
5.8
(a) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(b) Runs 1 and 2 based on average of 2 readings; run 3 based on
average of 5 readings; corrected to dry basis.
TABLE 3-22. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-TOG, METHANE/ETHANE
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
380
17.6
2.2
4.1
1,152
37,001
21,711
400
17.6
2.2
5.5
1,054
33,836
19,104
409
17.6
2.2
4.2
1,072
34,435
19,493
CONCENTRATION, ppm
TOC, as propane (a)
TOC, as methane (a)
Methane (b)
Ethane
2.1
6.2
6.8
<3
1.3
3.8
5.3
<3
2.5
7.5
5.1
<3
Average
2.0
5.9
5.8
(a) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(b) Runs 1 and 2 based on average of 2 readings; run 3 based on
average of 5 readings; corrected to dry basis.
3-42
-------
TABLE 3-23. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-PM, PM-10,
CONDENSffiLE PM (METRIC UNITS)
Method 26A train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
14:07
19:17
175
78.3
2.439
2.338
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.8
3.092
2.955
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
1995
2.835
GAS PARAMETERS /
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
224
17.8
1.1
4.4
349
1,042
575.0
222
18.8
1.8
4.6
344
1,026
567.4
227
18
2
4.7
334
998
545.6
MASS COLLECTED, g
Filterable PM
0.0496
0.0473
0.0600
CONCENTRATION, g/DSCM
Filterable PM | 0.0212
0.0160
0.0212
Average
0.0195
Method 29 train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
92.1
1891
1809
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
99.3
3.724
3.594
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
99.5
2.990
1867
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
221
17.6
12
4.4
354
1,055
587
221
18.4
1
43
422
1,259
701
224
17.8
1.7
4.7
339
1,012
557
MASS COLLECTED, g
Filterable PM
0.0537
0.0430
0.0886
CONCENTRATION, g/DSCM
Filterable PM
0.0191
0.0120
0.0309
Average
0.0207
3-43
-------
TABLE 3-23
(METRIC
(continued)
UNITS)
Method 20 1A/202 train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
1
11/11/93
10:55
12:27
90
106.8
1.212
1.174
2
11/11/93
14:59
16:42
90
99
1.234
1.183
3
11/11/93
17:07
18:39
90
97.4
1.247
1.187
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
193
17.6
2.2
4.1
351.1
1,048
614.8
204
17.6
2.2
5.5
321.3
958.1
541.0
209
17.6
2.2
4.2
326.7
975.1
552.0
MASS COLLECTED, g
Filterable PM
Filterable PM-10
Cond. inorganic PM
Cond. organic PM
Total cond. PM
0.0177
0.0033
0.167
0.0548
0.222
0.0188
0.0147
0.183
0.0153
0.199
0.0127
0.0047
0.162
0.0104
0.172
CONCENTRATION, g/DSCM
Filterable PM
Filterable PM-10
Cond. inorganic PM
Cond. organic PM
Total cond. PM
0.0151
0.00281
0.142
0.0467
0.1S9
0.0159
0.01243
0.155
0.0129
0.168
0.0107
0.00396
0.136
O.OOSS
0.145
Average
0.0139
0.00640
0.144
0.0228
0.167
TABLE 3-23. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS--PM, PM-10,
CONDENSIBLE PM'(ENGLISH UNITS)
Method 26A train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
14:07
19:17
175
78.3
86.15
8Z57
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.8
109.20
104.34
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
105.78
100.10
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
436
17.8
1.1
4.4
1,146
36,805
20,307
431
18.8
1.8
4.6
1,128
36,230
20,036
440
18.0
2.0
4.7
1,097
35,241
19,269
MASS COLLECTED, gr
Filterable PM | 0.765
0.730
0.926
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Filterable PM
0.00927
0.00700
0.00925
Average
0.00851
3-44
-------
TABLE 3-23. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-PM, PM-10,
CONDENSDBLE PM (ENGLISH UNITS) (continued)
Method 29 train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
14:30
19:15
175
92.7
1011
99.21
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
99.3
131.5
126.9
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
99.5
105.6
101.3
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
429
17.6
2.2
4.4
1,160
37,260
20,713
429
18.4
1
4.3
1,385
44,462
24,738
435
17.8
1.7
4.7
1,113
35,729
19,683
MASS COLLECTED, gr
Filterable PM
0.829
0.664
1.367
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Filterable PM
0.00835
0.00523
0.0135
Average
0.00903
Method 201 A/202 train
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
Run
1
11/11/93
10:55
12:27
90
106.8
4179
41.46
2
11/11/93
14:59
16:42
90
99.0
43.57
41.76
3
11/11/93
17:07
18:39
90
97.4
44.04
41.93
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
380
17.6
2.2
4.1
1,152
37,001
21,711
400
17.6
2.2
5.5
1,054
33,836
19,104
409
17.6
2.2
4.2
1,072
34,435
19,493
MASS COLLECTED, gr
Filterable PM
Filterable PM-10
Cond. inorganic PM
Cond. organic PM
Total cond. PM
0.273
0.051
2.573
0.846
3.418
0.290
0.227
1830
0.236
3.066
0.196
0.073
2.497
0.160
2.657
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
Filterable PM
Filterable PM-10
Cond. inorganic PM
Cond. organic PM
Total cond. PM
0.00659
0.00123
0.0620
0.02040
0.0824
0.00695
0.00543
0.0678
0.00565
0.0734
0.00467
0.00173
0.0596
0.00383
0.0634
Average
0.00607
0.00280
0.0631
0.00996
0.0731
3-45
-------
filterable PM-10, condensible inorganic PM and condensible organic PM were 0.21 kg/hr
(0.47 Ib/hr), 4.9 kg/hr (11 Ib/hr), and 0.81 kg/hr (1.8 Ib/hr), respectively. The average
emission factors for filterable PM-10, condensible inorganic PM, and condensible organic
PM were 0.067 kg/Mg (0.13 Ib/ton), 1.6 kg/Mg (3.1 Ib/ton), and 0.26 kg/Mg (0.51 Ib/ton),
respectively.
3.3.4.7 HP. HC1. Ch. Emissions from the kiln were sampled for HF, HC1, and C12
using a Method 26A sampling train. Table 3-10 summarizes the emission rates and emission
factors for emissions of these compounds from the kiln, and Table 3-24 summarizes the
sampling data and concentrations of these compounds in the exhaust stream. Emissions of
HF averaged 0.47 kg/hr (1.0 Ib/hr); HC1 emissions averaged 0.029 kg/hr (0.063 Ib/hr); and
C\2 emissions averaged 0.0021 kg/hr (0.0047 Ib/hr). Calculated average emission factors are
0.15 kg/Mg (0.30 Ib/ton) for HF, 0.0091 kg/Mg (0.018 Ib/ton) for HC1, and 0.00067 kg/Mg
(0.0013 Ib/ton) for C12. The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for these pollutants
are provided in Appendix C.
3.3.5 Dryer Emission Results
Emissions from the dryer stack were monitored continuously for TOC and semi-
continuously for methane/ethane. Total hydrocarbon emissions were measured using
Method 25A. Volumetric flowrates were measured only during Runs 2 and 3. Therefore,
emission rates for Run 1 were determined using the average of the flowrates for Runs 2 and
3. The concentration of TOC in the dryer stack exhaust averaged 90 ppm as propane
(converted to 269 ppm as methane). Emissions of methane/ethane were measured using
Method 18. The concentration of methane in the dryer stack exhaust averaged 104 ppm and
the concentration of ethane in the exhaust stream averaged 8.2 ppm. Table 3-11 summarizes
the emission rates and emission factors for these compounds from the kiln, and Table 3-25
summarizes the sampling data and concentrations of these compounds in the exhaust stream.
The detailed results of the sampling and analysis for these pollutants are provided in
Appendix C.
Following the emission test, it was determined that the gas burners on the dryer were
malfunctioning. Therefore, the results presented in Tables 3-11 and 3-25 are not considered
to be representative of emissions from a gas-fired brick dryer. After the defective burners
were repaired, emissions from the dryer were retested by another testing firm that was
contracted by Belden. The results of that retest are provided in Appendix F.
3-46
-------
TABLES
-24. KILNEMISSIOl
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACM
Sample volume, DSCM
* TESTS RESULTS-HF. HCI.
i
11/09/93
14:07
19:17
175
78.3
2.439
2.338
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.8
3.092
2.955
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
2.995
2.835
C12 (MET
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity M/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
224
17.8
1.1
4.4
349.4
1,042
575.0
222
18.8
1.8
4.6
343.9
1,026
567.4
227
18.0
2.0
4.7
334.5
997.9
545.6
MASS COLLECTED, ug
HF
HC1
CI2
31,969
2,117
128
43,518
2,449
216
37,333
2,302
169
CONCENTRATION, ug/DSCM
HF
HC1
C12
13,673
905
54.7
14,729
829
73.1
13,171
812
59.6
Average
13,858
849
62.5
•RIC UNITS)
TABLE 3-24. KILN EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-HP, HCI, C12
(ENGLISH UNITS)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time, min
% isokinetic
Sample volume, ACF
Sample volume, DSCF
1
11/09/93
14:07
19:17
175
78.3
86.148
82.567
2
11/10/93
09:42
13:57
175
100.8
109.203
104.337
3
11/10/93
15:53
19:47
175
100.5
105.783
100.101
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
436
17.8
1.1
4.4
1,146
36,805
20,307
431
18.8
1.8
4.6
1,128
36,230
20,036
440
18.0
2.0
4.7
1,097
35,241
19,269
MASS COLLECTED, gr
HF
HCI
C12
0.493
0.0327
0.00198
0.672
0.0378
0.00333
0.576
0.0355
0.00261
CONCENTRATION, gr/DSCF
HF
HCI
C12
0.00598
0.000396
239E-05
0.00644
0.000362
3.19E-05
0.00576
0.000355
2.61E-05
Average
0.00606
0.000371
2.73E-05
3-47
-------
TABLE 3-25. DRYER EMISSION TESTS RESULTS-TOG, METHANE, AND
ETHANE (METRIC UNITSKa)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, C
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, m/min
Flowrate, ACM/min
Flowrate, DSCM/min
CONCENTRATION, pi
TOC, as propane (b)
TOC, as methane (b)
Methane (c)
Ethane (c)
38
17.6
2.2
4.2
868
1,428
1,256
38
17.6
2.2
4.2
831
1,368
1,203
38
17.6
2.2
4.2
852
1,402
1,233
jm
83.7
251
106
9.6
89.4
268
95.0
7.0
95.9
288
111
7.9
Average
89.7
269
104
8.2
(a) Gas burners malfunctioning during emission test; results not representative
of properly operating gas-fired dryer.
(b) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(c) Runs 1, 2, and 3 based on 6, 8, and 1 readings, respectively.
TABLE 3-25. (ENGLISH UNITS) (a)
Run No.
Date
Start time
Finish time
Sample time
1
11/11/93
10:35
12:36
121
2
11/11/93
13:11
15:11
120
3
11/11/93
15:27
17:27
120
GAS PARAMETERS
Gas temperature, F
Oxygen, %
Carbon dioxide, %
Moisture, %
Velocity, ft/min
Flowrate, ACFM
Flowrate, DSCFM
CONCENTRATION, p
TOC, as propane (b)
TOC, as methane (b)
Methane (c)
Ethane (c)
100
17.6
2.2
4.2
2,847
50,444
44,365
100
17.6
2.2
4.2
2,726
48,305
42,487
100
17.6
2.2
4.2
2,794
49,502
43,545
jm
83.7
251
106
9.6
89.4
268
95.0
7.0
95.9
288
111
7.9
Average
89.7
269
104
8.2
(a) Gas burners malfunctioning during emission test; results not representative
of properly operating gas-fired dryer.
(b) Based on average of 120 one-minute readings.
(c) Runs 1,2, and 3 based on 6,8, and 1 readings, respectively.
3-48
-------
SECTION 4
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
This section describes the sampling procedures and analysis procedures used during
this test program. Section 4.1 presents the sampling methods used. Section 4.2 presents the
procedures for collecting process samples. Section 4.3 presents the analytical procedures.
4.1 EMISSION TEST METHODS
Emission samples were collected using the following seven separate sampling
systems:
1. EPA draft Reference Method (RM) 29 for multiple metals;
2. Reference Method 26A for filterable PM, HC1/C12, and HF;
3. Method 0030 (VOST) for speciated VOC;
4. Method 0010 for semivolatile organic compounds;
5. Reference Method 201A/202 for filterable PM-10 and condensible PM;
6. Instrumental analyses for CO2 (Method 3A), CO (Method 10), SO2 (Method 6C), TOC
(Method 25A), NOX (Method 7E), and Method 18 for methane/ethane(semicontinuous);
7. High-volume ambient sampling system for ambient PM-10; and
8. Grab sampling of process material from the grinding/screening operation.
An integrated gas bag sample for Orsat analysis (Method 3A) was collected in conjunction
with the sampling runs (see Figure 4-1).
4.1.1 Metals
The sampling train and procedure for Method 29 is shown in Figure 4-2. Because of
the low PM emissions expected for this test, a cyclone was not used. The samples were
4-1
-------
Quartz/Glass liner
Thermocouple
Nozzle
Reverse - Type
Pilot Tube
Cyclone (Optional)
Potentiometer \ fr'lt1er
T/C
Various Irnpingers Depending on Sampling Train
T/C T/C Fine Control
Valve
Flexible
Tubing
Bag
Figure 4-1. Sampling system for oxygen and carbon dioxide.
4-2
-------
O" O
CO CO
ir
Sr ?r O
_l _l CO
E £ oi
888
*- t- CJ
6
CO
at
1
i
s
a
1
1
2
i— «^
E
CO
Dl
3
.a
c
o
s
O
1
|
^~«y
f»n)
1
CO
en
1
c
o
0
O
1>
1
2
j*~«^
(co)
3
'g
ao
"S.
r-"
rt
&o
00
"3
D
4-3
-------
collected isokinetically over a complete traverse of the stack as required by 40 CFR 60
Appendix A, Methods 1 through 5.
4.1.2 Method 26A Sampling Train for Participate Matter. HCl/Ck. and HF
The Method 26A train used for PM, HC1/C12, and HF is a standard EPA Method 5
train except for modifications to the impinger train (Figure 4-3 is a schematic of the sample
for train and sample recovery procedures). The first two impingers were used to collect HC1
and HF. The third impinger prevents the mixing of acid and base impinger solutions. The
fourth and fifth impingers were used to collect C^. The probe/front-half wash and filter
fractions from all test runs were analyzed gravimetrically for particulates per FJPA Method 5.
Because of the low PM emissions expected for this test, a cyclone was not used. The
samples were collected isokinetically over a complete traverse of the stack as required by
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 1 through 5.
4.1.3 VOST for Volatile Organic Compounds
Volatile organic compound emissions were sampled from the exhaust gas stream by
the SW-846 Method 0030. (Figure 4-4 presents a schematic of the sampling tram). A total
of seven trap pairs were collected, each over a 20 min period. However, only three trap
pairs were analyzed. Target analytes and analytical procedures are discussed in more detail
in Section 4.3.2.
The following are exceptions and/or additions to the procedures to the SW-846 0030
sampling method.
1. The heated probe liner may be constructed of Teflon instead of glass.
2. After collection of the 20-L sample, the two sorbent traps were removed from the train,
immediately capped at the ends, and placed into metal transport cans which contained
charcoal. The cans were stored and transported in insulated containers packed with ice
to maintain the temperature of the traps near 4°C at all times.
3. Field blanks, trip blanks, and other conditioned (cleaned) sorbent traps were also stored
and transported as described above for sample traps.
4.1.4 Semivolatile Organic Compounds
Semivolatile organic compound emissions were sampled from the exhaust gas stream
by the SW-846 Method 0010. The samples were collected isokinetically over a complete
traverse of the stack as required by 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 1 through 5. In this
train, Semivolatile organic target analytes are collected in a sorbent trap with about 65 g
XAD-2 resin. Figure 4-5 is a schematic of the sampling train. Figure 4-6 provides the
4-4
-------
4-5
-------
«
p
00
O
&
o
-------
4-7
-------
Pour
Condensate
I Through XAD
Resin
-0
Probe and Nozzle
Up to Filter
Rinse and Brush Probe, Nozzle,
and Front Half of Rlter Three
Times with Methanol/Methylene
Chloride Mixture
Back Half of Filter Holder
Through to XAD Resin
Cartridge
Rinse Three Times with
Methanol/Methylene
Chloride Mixture
-^fa-
. Collect
All Condensate
Rinse All Three Impingers
with Methanol/Methylene
Chloride Mixture
Weigh Silica Gel and
Discard or Regenerate
Figure 4-6. SVOST sample recovery.
4-8
-------
sample recovery diagram. The end numbers are sample container numbers, which are
discussed in Section 4.3.3.
4.1.5 Method 201A Sampling Train for Filterable PM-1Q
PM-10 sampling was performed using the constant sampling rate procedure given in
EPA Method 201A. An Andersen Model 28-9 train equipped with a SoRI Cyclone X
in-stack sizing device was used during sampling. A schematic of the Method 201A sampling
train and recovery diagram is shown in Figure 4-7.
4.1.6 Method 202 for Condensible PM-10
Condensible PM-10 emissions were measured (kiln only) in conjunction with and
using the same sampling train as filterable PM-10. Per Method 202, the third impinger
contained 100 ml of distilled water. The impinger train contents were extracted and analyzed
according to Method 202.
4.1.7 High-Volume Sampling System for PM-10
Ambient PM-10 sampling was performed inside and outside the screening/grinding
building. The air sampling devices used were two standard high-volume air samplers fitted
with Sierra Model 230P cyclone preseparators. The cyclone exhibits an effective 50 percent
cutoff diameter (D^Q) of approximately 10 jum in aerodynamic diameter when operated at a
flow rate of 20 acfm. The sampler was fitted with an appropriate diameter intake nozzle so
that samples were collected under nearly isokinetic conditions. The instrument was placed at
two outdoor locations: one to the east and one to the west of the grinding/screening
building. Also, sampling was performed at one indoor.
At the end of each run, the exposed media was carefully transferred in the sampling
cartridges to protective containers to prevent paniculate loss and to avoid handling in the
dusty sampling environment. The media then was transferred to the field laboratory where
exposed filters were removed from their cartridges, folded, and placed in individual glassine
envelopes and then into numbered file folders. Filter conditioning and weighing was
performed according to MRI's Standard Operating Procedures.
4.1.8 CO, CO,. SO). NCL. TOC. and Methane/Ethane
^ ^ ^.
Emissions of TOC, NOX, SO2, CO, and C02 were measured using instrumental
analyzers. The measurements were conducted in accordance with EPA Methods 25A, 7E,
6C, 10, and 3A, respectively. EPA Method 18 was used to measure methane/ethane.
4-9
-------
§§,/->
IlO
E
0)
*-*
CO
O
O
4-10
-------
4.1.8.1 Instrumental measurement system. A simplified schematic of the
instrumental analyzer system is shown in Figure 4-8. The sampling system contained the
following components:
A gas distribution manifold
M&C Model ECF Electro Gas Cooler
Odessa data logging unit, Model No. SPLC 3260
Thermal Environmental Model 42 Chemiluminescence NOX Analyzer
Horiba Model CMA/CFA Series for CO, CO2, and NO2
Bovar Model 721ATM SO2 Analyzer
JUM Model VE-7 TOC Analyzer
The probe was stainless steel tube approximately 0.5 in o.d. of sufficient length to reach the
center of the stack. An electrically heated Teflon line from Technical Heaters, Inc., was
used to maintain line temperature at 250°F.
Prefiltered air was the TOC zero gas, and prepurified nitrogen was the zero gas for the
remaining analyzers. All span gases were EPA Protocol cylinder gases, in date, certified to
within 1 percent by Scott Specialty Gases. Analyzers were spanned at the following nominal
concentrations:
Analyzer Span cone.
SO2 250 ppm SO2
CO 250 ppm CO
NOX 200 ppm NO
TOC 100 ppm propane
CO2 25 percent CO2
Analyzer linearity checks were conducted at each of the following nominal test gas
concentrations using EPA Protocol gases which were introduced to the analyzer manifold.
Analyzer Linearity cone. Accuracy limit
SO2 25 ppm, 100 ppm 2% of span gas
CO 90 ppm, 125 ppm 2% of span gas
NOX 100 ppm 2% of span gas
TOC 25 ppm, 50 ppm 5% of span gas
CO2 61%, 12%
4.1.8.2 Procedure for Method 18. Sampling and analysis was completed using EPA
Method 18. A vacuum pump was used to draw samples and standards through a 1/4-in
Teflon line from the sampling manifold to charge a 2-mm heated sample loop before
introduction onto the analytic column (Supelco SPB-5, 30-m x 530-/xm, and 1.5-fj.m film).
Samples were analyzed every 10 min. Two primary standards, each containing methane and
ethane at concentrations expected to bracket the concentrations found in the sample stream,
4-11
-------
I
CO
-------
were used to calibrate the gas chromatograph at the beginning and end of each run. The gas
chromatograph was operated isothermally at — 20°C.
The sample peaks were quantified by direct comparison with the external standard
peak using the equation:
(Sample peak area) (Standard cone. (ppmv])
Sample cone. [ppmv] = -—-
Standard peak area
4.2 PROCESS DATA MEASUREMENT
Process data were collected on the kiln, dryer, and raw material grinding/screening
operations for Plant No. 6. These data, which were recorded by Belden, were used to
monitor the processes and to develop emission factors for the sources being tested. The
procedures used to measure process rates during the emission test are summarized in the
following paragraphs.
4.2.1 Grinding/Screening Operation
In addition to the emission measurements on the fabric filter inlet and outlet, three
sets of data were collected from the grinding/screening operation: (1) a record of truck loads
(clay material only) received at the grinding building; (2) the weight of material collected by
the clay line fabric filter; and (3) measurements of the processing rate of finished clay
material.
4.2.1.1 Quantity of raw material received. Raw material is transported in 25-ton
truckloads from the mines to the grinding/screening building continuously throughout the
day. Belden Brick routinely records the tune at which each truckload is emptied into the
crusher hopper. The daily records of truckloads received for each day of testing at the
grinding/screening building are summarized in Appendix E.
4.2.1.2 Fabric filter dust collection. Prior to testing, Belden emptied the two
hoppers for the fabric filter that serves the clay processing line in the grinding/screening
building. During both days of testing on the grinding/screening operation, Belden emptied
the hopper and weighed the dust collected at intervals of 1 to 3 hours.
4.2.1.3 Fine clay production. Finished clay material is conveyed from the
grinding/screening building to the fine clay storage bins, which are located in an adjacent
building. Prior to testing, Belden installed a diverter chute at the dropoff point for this
conveyor. During the testing of the grinding/screening operation, Belden collected the
material diverted from the fine clay storage bins in a container. This material was collected
for 10 seconds at 15 minute intervals over a 4-hour period and weighed. A total of 17
measurements were made on each day of the test. From these measurements, average
4-13
-------
production rates were determined for each of the two days of testing on the
grinding/screening operation. The results showed little variation and indicate that the fine
clay production rate was consistent during the test; the relative standard deviations of the
weight measurements for each day were 3 and 4 percent, respectively.
While measuring the fine material production rate, Belden also collected three
samples of the material for subsequent sieve and moisture analysis. The results of all
measurements related to the grinding/screening operation are presented in Appendix E.
4.2.2 Kiln and Drver
Three sets of process data were collected on kiln and dryer operations during the
emission test: (1) kiln and dryer temperatures, (2) kiln and dryer throughput, and (3) natural
gas consumption rate.
Kiln and dryer temperatures are recorded routinely by Belden. Following the test,
Belden provided average dryer inlet and outlet temperatures and average kiln inlet and peak
temperatures for each day of testing. Belden does not routinely record gas consumption for
the kilns. However, during the week of the test, Belden recorded daily gas consumption for
kiln 3 based on the gas usage meter at the kiln. Appendix E includes the data for these
measurements as provided by Belden.
Belden routinely maintains separate kiln car records, which include the number of
bricks, type of brick, brick weight, and kiln car push times for each kiln car. During the
week of the test, each kiln car of bricks dried and fired were identical in terms of the
number, size, and type of bricks loaded on each. Using this information, Belden determined
the process rate for both feed and production for the dryers and kiln tested. These reduced
data are presented in Appendix E.
4.3 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The following section describes the procedures employed during the analysis of
samples collected during this project. These procedures cover the analysis of metals, VOC,
semivolatiles, PM, HCl/C^/HF, sieve sizing, and moisture. Instrumental (TOC, SC^, NOX,
CO, CO2) analysis information is incorporated into the sampling procedures.
4.3.1 Metals Analysis bv ICAP
Metals were analyzed in the stack emission samples for 11 metals of interest, arsenic
(As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), beryllium (Be), antimony (Sb), lead (Pb),
mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and selenium (Se). The metals analysis
procedures for the stack emission samples are summarized in Figure 4-9 and were performed
in accordance with the detailed procedures developed in the Draft EPA Method 29
("Determination of Metals Emissions From Stationary Sources"), and SW 846 Methods
6010A (multiple metals) and 7470 (mercury) with some modifications as described below.
4-14
-------
CO
NGERS 5 4
HCI RINSE
£2
5
UJ
GESTWITH
\CID AND
MANGANAT
5 'ffl
0.
tr
&
|j*
<
^•3
OW
ujvn
r^
5^
>ou
0«
cZ
2E
UJ
T H
DIGEST WITt
ACID AND
ERMANGANA
CL
KM
ANALYZE FC
Hg BY CVAA
m
z.^*-
§0
-1- CL
MUI
52
0±
zfe
OS
O~
^o"
ii
tc
UJ
5
CL
21
2WO
DW2
UJUJUJ
~<2
Q
K
U.COO.
5K
LUO
ecu.
uj
a.
0^2
°2
oi
II
If
So
<"-
UJ
M D
.s
e
(U
6
ON
cs
"§
D
s
O
o\
W)
<
o
in
in
UJ
O
§
t
gs
s
4-15
-------
The stack gas samples and blank reagents from the emissions test at the Belden brick
kiln were digested using Draft Method 29. Boric acid addition was not utilized as specified
in the Test Plan, since the ICP was fitted with a hydrofluoric acid-(HF) resistant inlet system
prior to analysis. The boric addition was previously used to allow ICP analysis without risk
of damaging (HF etching) the torch. In addition, the front-half filter, probe rinse and
back-half impinger samples were digested and analyzed separately. The flow chart presented
in the test plan (page 5-15) designates that these FH and BH samples are proportionally
combined and then analyzed. Further digestion was performed for mercury (Hg) in the stack
gas samples using SW-846 Method 7470. This method was slightly modified in order to
allow sufficient digest volume for multimetals analysis by ICP.
4.3.1.1 Stack gas analysis. Multiple metals analysis was performed on a
Thermo-Jarrell Ash Model 6 IE ICP-AES and Hg was analyzed using a PSA Merlin Plus
Mercury Analyzer. Each instrument was calibrated and verified using a calibration check
standard (from an alternate supplier), prior to analysis of stack gas samples. In addition,
method continuing calibration standards and blanks were routinely analyzed to verify
calibration of the instrument.
An HF-resistant inlet system to the ICP was utilized for the analysis of front-half
digests containing HF, in order to prevent damage to the standard inlet system of the ICP.
Quarterly instrumental detection limits (IDL's) for each analytical system were utilized
during these analyses. The quarterly IDL's are determined from seven analyses of a low
standard on 3 nonconsecutive days.
4.3.2 VOST Sample Analysis by GC/MS
VOST samples were analyzed for the Method 8240 target analytes as listed in
Table 4-1. Analysis of each pair of traps was by thermal desorption followed by purge and
trap GC/MS analysis, specifically as described in SW-846 Method 5041 with minor
modifications listed in Table 4-2. A DB-624 megabore (J&W Scientific, Folson, California)
column was used for the analysis of VOST samples.
For each run, Tenax and Tenax/charcoal traps were analyzed separately to determine
target analyte concentrations. Analyte concentrations on each trap pair were summed and
divided by the total volume of gas sampled to determine the average emission concentration
(ng/L). Sample analyses were completed on November 23, 1993; all analyses were
performed within the 14-day holding time.
4.3.3 Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis by GC/MS
Samples were received on November 15, 1993, the samples were stored at 4°C prior
to extraction. Reagent blanks were received with the MM5 samples. These blanks were
archived in the cold room.
4-16
-------
TABLE 4-1. TARGET ANALYTES FOR METHOD 8240 (VOST)
Method 8240
Volatiles
Bromochloromethane
Acetone
Bromoethane
Carbon disulfide
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (surr.)
1,1 -Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
1,4-Difluorobenzene
Benzene
Bromodichloromethene
Bromoform
2-Butanone
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorodibromomethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl acetate
Benzene-d4 (surr.)1
Chlorobenzene-ds
Bromofluorobenzene (surr.)
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Styrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Toluene-d8 (surr.)
o-Xylene
m/p-Xylene
Does not include:
2-Chloroethyl vinylether
1 VOST matrices only.
Internal standards are underlined.
4-17
-------
TABLE 4-2. MODIFICATIONS TO THE VOLATILE ORGANIC
ANALYSIS METHODS
The following modifications for EPA SW-846 (3rd Ed.) are listed by method
number and applicable section.
Section No.
Modification
Method 5041
4.2.1
4.2.2
5.4.2
5.8
5.9
5.7
The purge vessel was heated to 65 °C in order to have an
acceptable recovery for water soluble compound, acrylonitrile.
See text for explanation.
The analytical trap vary according to analysis needs.
Stock solutions are maintained for 2 months for reactive
compounds and gases, 6 months for all others. They are replaced
sooner if signs of degradation are evident (per Method 8260).
The amount of BFB used to demonstrate acceptable MS tuning
varies according to the Instrument sensitivity requirements for this
analysis. In general, however, 100 ng of BFB is used.
Concentrations of stock, secondary and calibration standards vary
according to analysis needs.
Internal standard and surrogate standard concentrations vary
according to analysis needs. Internal standard and surrogate
compounds are prepared in a combined solution for VOST and
water analyses, and in separate solutions for waste feed analyses.
4-18
-------
The MM5 samples were extracted according to EPA SW-846 Method 0010. The
extractions were started on November 16, 1993 and GC/MS analysis completed on
December 1, 1993. All holding times were met for extraction and analysis.
Figure 4-10 presents a schematic of the analysis procedures. For the MM5 samples,
the XAD/filter were combined, fortified with the 8270 Base/Neutral and Acid surrogate
spiking mix, and Soxhlet-extracted with methylene chloride (Method 3540). The front half
rinse, back half rinse, and condensate were combined in a separatory funnel and extracted
with methylene chloride (Method 3510). The two extracts were combined and concentrated
using Kuderna-Danish and nitrogen evaporation to a volume of 10 mL. The samples were
split, 5 mL for archive and 5 mL were further concentrated to 1 mL.
Three additional samples labeled filter support rinse were collected in the field.
These rinses were spiked with the surrogate spiking mixes and concentrated by Kuderna-
Danish and nitrogen evaporation to 10 mL. The samples were split, 5 mL for archive and
5 mL were further concentrated to 1 mL.
The samples were analyzed by quadruple gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
(GC/MS), on the TRIO-1A using a DB-5 60-m column according to SW-846 Method 8270.
Two of the MM5 sample trains were diluted. Run 1 was injected twice for a duplicate
injection. Table 4-3 lists the target analytes for the analysis.
During the analysis of the filter support rinses, the internal standard areas decreased
by a factor of three. This is attributed to sample matrix effects since the extracts were a
black color with visible particles suspended in the solvent. The lower internal standard areas
affected the surrogate recoveries and the majority were outside the method objective. These
samples could be subject to cleanup (e.g., Florisil or GPC) and reanalyzed to improve
surrogate recovery and internal standard response. This additional work is outside the scope
of this project.
4.3.4 Particulate Matter Analysis
Total paniculate analysis was performed according to the procedures established in
EPA Method 5. Analysis for filterable PM-10 was performed according to Method 201 A,
and analyses for condensible PM-10 was performed according to Method 202. Analysis for
high-volume PM-10 samples was performed gravimetrically on filters and cyclone washes
according to MRI's Standard Operating Procedures.
4.3.5 HCl/Clo and HF Analysis
Analysis of HC1 and HF as chloride and fluoride in impinger aliquots was conducted
according to draft EPA Method 26A. The concentration of chloride (mg/L) in the sample
solution and the total volume of the solution was reported. Analysis of total chlorine was
conducted according to ASTM Method D 808-87 with the resulting sample matrix analyzed
by ion chromatography according to ASTM Method D 4327-84.
4-19
-------
Apparatus Rinse
0
XAD Resin and Filter
Front Hall Rinse
Back Half Rinse
0
Condensate
1/2 of Extract (POHC and PICs)
(Optional) Screen
by GC/EC or
GC/FID
Extract 3x with Solvent
Methylene Chloride
••• Add GC/MS Internal Standard
Figure 4-10. Analysis scheme for MM5-SV train components.
4-20
-------
TABLE 4-3. TARGET ANALYTES FOR METHOD 8270
(Semivolatile organic compound)
Method 8270
SW-846 Semivolatiles
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d.i
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Fluorophenol (surr.)
Hexachloroethane
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Phenol
Phenol-d5 (surr.)
1,4-Dibromobenzene-d4 (surr.)
Phenanthrene-d,n
Anthracene
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Di-n-butyl phthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Fluoranthene
Hexachlorobenzene
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene-d10 (surr.)
Does not include:
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Internal standards are underlined.
surr. = surrogate compound
Naphthalene-d,
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphtalene
Nitrobenzene
Nitrobenzene-ds (surr.)
2-Nitrophenol
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene-d3 (surr.
Chrysene-d17
Benzo(a)anthracene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chrysene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Pyrene
Terphenyl-d14 (surr.)
Pyrene-d,0 (surr.)
Acenaphthene-d,n
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Dibenzofuran
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Fluorene
2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (surr.)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Pervlene-d,-,
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Di-n-ocrylphthalate
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
4-21
-------
4.3.6 Sieve Sizing and Moisture Analysis
For each run, a composite sample was prepared from the three grab samples and
analyzed for sieve size (silt) by screening and percent moisture by gravimetric methods.
4-22
-------
SECTION 5
INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES
5.1 METALS ANALYSIS
5.1.1 Instrumental Quality Control
Instrument calibration was verified using multielement standards obtained from an
alternate supplier than those used for calibration. In addition, all correlation coefficient
requirements were met per the analytical method. Instrumental drift was monitored
throughout each analysis at less than 7 percent for all analytes (method criteria is
± 10 percent from target). All initial calibration verification analyses met SW-846
Methods 6010A and 7470 criteria and were within 5 percent from the target concentration
(method criteria is ± 10 percent from target).
In addition, the interference check standard results (ICP only) were within the limits
set by Method 6010A (method criteria is ± 20 percent from target). Serial dilution tests
were not required per Method 6010A, due to the low levels in the resulting digest by ICP.
5.1.1 Method Quality Control
The method blanks were used for monitoring potential laboratory contribution during
processing and analysis. Levels of analytes in the method blank were beneath the detection
limit for most analytes. The few analytes detected were close to the detection limit (i.e., less
than approximately 2 times the MDL).
Reagent blanks were also analyzed to monitor potential for contribution from reagent
supplies and equipment used in sample collection. All back-half and Hg impinger reagents
were detected near or less than the instrumental DL. Results for the filter and acetone rinse
reagent blanks are reported in Table 5-1 (1056/MMBI R. Blanks). Table 5-2 presents the
reagent and method blank values for the mercury analysis.
Method quality control results are reported in Tables 5-3 (for ICP analytes) and 5-4
(for Hg). Accuracy was monitored using spiked laboratory reagents (LCS), recoveries
ranged from 93 to 111 percent (criteria is 70 to 130 percent). Further accuracy was
monitored using a front-half representative NIST filter containing certified levels of Cd, Mn,
and Pb. The resulting front-half recoveries ranged from 70 to 110 percent, with the
exception of Pb, which was at a target level below ICP detection capability.
5-1
-------
H
J
PQ
O
W
on
55
8
o
12
o
<
J
E
3
1
I
3
1
0
0
3
«•
s
j
J1
S
•«
i
5-2
-------
TABLE 5-2. MERCURY REAGENT AND METHOD BLANK RESULTS
Impingers 4 - 6, Hg Results:
Sample , %'^H
H> - % v\ ?-;
Method Blank
1058 Reagent Blank
1059 Reagent Blank
1060 Reagant Blank
1032
2032
3032
1033
2033
3033
1034
2034
3034
\8ar#d* ^
** H> **
02921
02904
02905
02906
02907
02908
02909
02910
02911
02912
02913
02914
02915
'"^HB'-^
. 2.26'
0.150
<0.20
0.294
0.353
0.132
0.394
5.72
5.04
4.28
<0.22
0.264
0.238
'\UnJt*
ug
"fl
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
"<" indicates a sample result is below the method OL
Bold values represent field samples, all others are laboratory generated QC samples.
The method blank level is near the OL
5-3
-------
C/D
H"^
CO
>
$
^
3
cu
u
H"H
%/}
l_ I
M
H
PM
s
£
o
IX,
><
3
§
<^^
LD
CO
ex
CO
I
*o
s
H
M
"5
M
41
°C
0
O
"o
I
'c
o
u.
: :^4
'/A"
V*^
' ,X Xv"
1^«
s' v ^
JO
O.
Z
' < '^
-•.;
i.
'."• -O
'. ** '
. 5
'-' '"
15
41
03
•" <
''I
-
ife
wfcfi
^****iv,V
"^J^o >^
J^« zz
>£v**v
j^>
' « A
v
v
A
>^
s£ *
,-,v> S
00^
•o o c
^ ' C1
S 2
00^
cs o «
CO ^~ ^
•o o
o —
00^
n O 0
T-o
o —
00^
D O <
CK O
0 *-
00^
•o o o
X3 O
o —
"~
00^
-fl
\ 2
o o ^
n O co
co' a
o —
O* O S^
ro o co
"* " f^
fv O
Ov
is ""•
o o
o --
^—
CO CO
3 3
CN
00
CO
CN
o-
t
41
o
u
a:
> w>
_4) y
4)
u
10 10
y y
Szz
co
V
coZZ
CN
«1^ C
CONio
V
CNZZ
f> — ^
^CN'O
CN O
CO < <
CN Z Z
I^zz
*
v
CN TT ^
^cs. 6
00 K
CDZZ
o
!o z z
•^
V
CO CO
3 3
>o
^
CO
CN
o
£•
4) 4)
5: >
Jj O
,,%/ ^^
^"#
— — H-
j o !2
•0 -0
CN CN
1 — h—
ri to
zz
cf-
>
o
4)
i
5
o
-C
VI
4>
^o
V
QJ
-C
1
o
Q
_x.
•c
o
°"
CD
_c
i
o
*
c
o
g
"c
41
o
c
o
u
-O
a.
4)
-C
>—
5
jig
?
^_o
0
J
4)
"vi
4)
.CO
•T3
4)
^
S
Z
4)
H-
•
vf
.fi
3
VI
41
ac
5J
o
~o
u
o
ca
i^
' t^"-1 x%*
v^»J3
/%%
w A
A/,Z
^
^
" ;••*
:'•• . ''
. 0
15
41
. .^
S / ^ O
oo ^
5 2
00^
•9 O ><
S 2
o ^D ^*
*o ^3 ^
< 0
00^
CO O C>
2 2
o o ^
^ o n
o —
00^
> o o
3 •-
00^
CO O >O
ri
O O o^
coo l-x
rx o
o —
CO O ^
CO O -O
-0 0
o>
00^
O O K
o 2
CO CO
3 3
>>
CO
CN
o
4)
0
u
4)
CK
^
4> *"
— ' .J
JS
a.
10 10 ,
y y
O
O
CN
C
Q
^
1
4)
O
J8
.
~3
0)
4)
Q.
6
o
+
~
I
u_
^
CN
,^
C
3
O
""
*~
T3
•
a>
4)
'5.
1/5
y
•^
~a
c
g
U_
t>0
(^)
— i
II
u
Q
5-4
-------
TABLE 5-4. QC SUMMARY FOR MERCURY CVAA ANALYSIS
'If .'•...": >. V . *jt . !". ?
1055 (digest) MS
7470 LCS
FH LCS (digest)
3029/3030/3065 (digest)
BH MB/Ckdn Blk (digest)
8H LCS (digesl)
1031
2031
3031
1055/1057 BH Blank
1055/1 057 AAS
1033
2033
3033
1058 MS
1059 MS
1060 MS
fepqrt**
" Averog*
" Cone,
49.2
49.3
1074
11.0
< 1.00
985
15.9
4.86
17.3
0.637
49.2
5.72
5.04
4.28
48.4
50.3
48.7
' Units
ug
og
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
%
feecaVery
98.3°/«
98.60/c
107.4°/c
....
....
98.5%
....
....
....
....
94.2°/c
....
—
....
93.3°/c
98.4°/c
94.8°/c
$4
«*'
....
....
....
4.3°/o
....
....
1.5°/e
1.3°/c
0.8°/(
....
....
4.6°/c
1.7°/c
1.9"/<
....
....
....
Front-half
Results
Back-half
Results
Impinger 4 -
Results
Bold Sample IDs represent field samples, all others are lab QC samples.
"<" indicates a sample result below the method OL
"digesl* means that the Hg aliquot is taken from a previously digested sample.
' RPO Relative Percent Difference. This is calculated only if the instrument response is greater than 10 limes the IDL.
5-5
-------
Precision, based on duplicate samples, were not a requirement for this work based on
QA/QC objectives in the Draft test plan. However, precision was monitored for Hg
analysis; results for duplicate analysis were less than 5 percent relative percent difference.
5.2 SEMIVOLAHLE ANALYSIS
5.2.1 Calibration
For the initial calibration curve analyzed on October 25, 1993, all calibration check
compounds (CCC's) and system performance check compounds (SPCC's) passed Method
criteria. Two analytes were greater than 30 percent REF (Benzidine at 42 percent and
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine at 30.1 percent).
All CCC's and SPCC's for the CCAL (continuing calibration check) analyzed on
November 30, 1993, passed Method criteria. Four analytes were greater than
30 percent difference from the initial calibration curve (benzoic acid at 47 percent,
2,4-dinitrophenol at 30.3 percent, 3,'dichlorobenzidine at 30.1 percent, and benzidine at
86 percent).
All CCC's and SPCC's for the CCAL (continuing calibration check) analyzed on
December 1, 1993, passed Method criteria. One analyte was greater than 30 percent
difference from the initial calibration curve benzidine at 62 percent).
5.2.2 Sample Surrogate Recoveries
Surrogate recoveries for the samples are reported in Table 5-5. With the exception of
the additional filter support rinse samples (Samples 1038A, 2038A, and 3038A), all sample
surrogate recoveries were within the objective of 50 to 150 percent.
5.2.3 Quality Control Sample Analyses
During the extraction of the XAD/filter samples, a XAD method blank, 28425, and
one XAD QA spike, 00482, were also extracted. A water QA spike, 00483, was extracted
with the condensate samples. The results and surrogate recoveries of the blank and QA
samples are presented in Tables 5-6 and 5-7.
The method blank contained four compounds, three of which were also found in the
samples. The amounts in the blank are lower than the samples. The compounds and
amounts in the blank are: benzoic acid 64 /*g, naphthalene 3.1 /^g, 2-hydroxyace-tophenone
3.2 ^tg, and bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 17 ^g. Benzoic acid is found Run in 3 at 623 ^g,
naphthalene in Runs 1 through 3 at 6 to 12 ^g, and bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate in Runs 1
through 3 at 77 to 510 /tg. Benzoic acid and bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate were found in the
XAD spike sample 00482.
5-6
-------
p
*-H
luorobiphenyl
fe
cs
O
VO
2-Chlorophenol
4
Q
fe
52
PS
00
cs
m
rt
O
cs
cs
00
^H
»-H
T— (
r— 1
I )
*n
^H
F"<
VO
o
^^
p. .<
o
c
6-Tribromophe
•^
cs"
5-7
-------
TABLE 5-6. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND OA RESULTS
Anatyte
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(1 -Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nttrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nrtroaniline
Oimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinrtrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nrtroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinftrophenol
4-Nrtrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-N'rtrosodiphenylamine
Method
blank
mass, ug
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
64
<2
<2
<2
<2
3.1
<2
<2
<2
<2
3.2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
00481
Mass, ug
308
<2
<2
316
597
615
597
589
<2
<2
5.3
<2
592
584
584
320
337
<2
<2
<2
331
606
326
<2
<2
617
323
<2
554
607
350
<2
604
<2
<2
360
662
<2
<2
337
200
289
574
632
<2
<2
354
<2
280
<2
Percent
recovery
92
95
90
92
90
88
89
88
88
96
101
99
91
98
93
97
83
91
105
91
108
99
101
60
87
86
95
106
84
00482
Mass, ug
39
<2
<2
39
76
79
77
74
<2
<2
<2
<2
71
80
86
43
15
85
<2
<2
<2
82
46
<2
<2
82
49
<2
81
42
54
<2
93
<2
<2
59
128
<2
<2
57
<2
57
104
128
<2
<2
67
<2
19
<2
Percent
recovery
58
58
57
59
57
55
53
60
64
64
22
65
61
69
61
73
60
3
81
70
88
96
85
0
85
78
96
100
29
00483
Mass, ug
10
<2
<2
22
34
36
29
35
<2
<2
<2
<2
30
46
50
23
17
<2
<2
<2
24
41
24
<2
<2
37
25
<2
45
18
27
<2
51
<2
<2
31
58
<2
<2
29
167
9
56
58
<2
<2
33
<2
21
<2
Percent
recovery
30
67
50
55
45
54
45
70
76
71
52
74
62
71
56
77
68
27
83
76
94
88
88
5
27
85
88
100
65
5-8
-------
TABLE 5-6. (continued)
Analyte
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo (b)f luoranthene
Benzo (k)f luoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Oibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Method
blank
mass, ug
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
17
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
00481
Mass, ug
<2
620
365
345
339
<2
<2
358
<2
342
<2
<2
314
292
<2
<2
352
318
336
332
352
265
Percent
recovery
93
110
104
102
108
103
94
88
106
95
101
100
106
80
00482
Mass, ug
<2
119
38
66
63
<2
<2
71
<2
69
<2
<2
62
58
14
<2
73
63
59
62
65
49
Percent
recovery
89
57
99
94
106
103
93
87
109
94
88
93
97
73
00483
Mass, ug
<2
63
29
32
31
<2
<2
35
<2
35
<2
<2
30
28
<2
<2
31
29
27
28
29
22
Percent
recovery
95
88
97
92
106
105
90
86
92
89
82
85
88
70
5-9
-------
TABLE 5-7. QA SURROGATE RECOVERY, %
Analyte
D4-1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
D5-Nitrobenzene
2-Fluorobiphenyl
D14-4-Terphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
D6-Phenol
D4-2-Chlorophenol
2,4, 6-Tribromophenol
Sample ID
Method blank
51
55
60
100
49a
51
50
87
00482
56
62
73
93
49a
54
52
98
00483
45a
67
66
87
41a
27a
60
92
*Do not meet method objective of 50 to 150%.
5-10
-------
5.2.4 Performance Audit Analyses
A Performance Audit Sample (PAS) 00481, provided by MRI's QA unit was analyzed
by GC/MS. The PAS met the percent recovery objective of 50 to 150 percent (see
Table 5-6).
5.3 VOST ANALYSIS
5.3.1 GC/MS Calibration
MRI used historical data from March 1993 for Initial Precision Recovery; these data
are presented in Appendix C. For each matrix, four replicate samples were analyzed at the
mid-level standard of 100 ng on-column.
Samples were received on November 15, 1993, in good condition. Eleven trap pairs
were received, including two field blank pairs, two trip blank pairs, and seven sample pairs.
The Tenax calibration curve was extended with two standards on November 18, 1993, and
two more standards on November 19, 1993. The purpose was to bracket the high levels of
benzene in the samples. The addition of calibration points to the curve for high level
samples is allowed by Method 5041. Sample 1073 contained very high levels of benzene,
and the instrument detector was saturated. The benzene result should be considered a
minimum value. Since the Tenax samples contained high levels of analytes, several system
blanks were required to ensure that the analytical system was free of sample contamination.
5.3.2 Assessment of Data Quality
The method was followed, and the objectives were met except for the following:
1. Chloromethane, bromomethane, and iodomethane were observed in the system blank
samples. The source of the contamination was identified as the methanol which was
used to prepare the internal standard solution and the internal standard/surrogate
solution. Chloromethane was observed in the field sample at 10 times the amount
found in the system blanks. Bromomethane was observed in the samples at the same
level or below that found in the system blank. Iodomethane was not a target
compound. These three compounds have been blank corrected and should be
considered as "estimated" values only.
2. The calibration curve ranged from 20 to 3,000 ng for the Tenax trap analysis, with an
extension for benzene up to 15,000 ng. Four compounds (Chloromethane,
bromomethane, 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoethane, and methylene chloride) did not meet the
calibration curve objective of 30 percent RSD.
3. The calibration curve ranged from 30 to 1,000 ng for the Tenax/charcoal trap curve.
Eight compounds (Chloromethane, bromomethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, methylene
5-11
-------
chloride, carbon disulfide, benzene, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, and chloroethane) did not
meet the 30 percent RSD objective. All values below 20 ng are considered estimates.
4. Two additional standards with benzene and internal standards were analyzed in order to
quantitate the high level of benzene in one sample. Since the benzene peak was
saturated in these two standards, the average response factor was not calculated for
these two points. The calibration standards were used to estimate the level of benzene
found in the sample using a single point calibration.
5. A high bias was observed in the performance audit samples (PAS) for a few analytes,
but all results were between 103 and 151 percent accuracy.
For the Tenax trap analysis, three compounds (carbon tetrachloride,
cw-l,3-dichloropropene, and rra/ts-l,3-dichloropropene) were higher than the 70 to
130 percent objective listed in the project plan. These three analytes were not observed in
the samples.
5.3.3 Performance Audit Samples
For the Tenax/charcoal trap analysis, five compounds in one PAS and eight
compounds in a second PAS did not meet the 70 to 130 percent objective listed in the project
plan. The results for the two PAS's were consistent with each other. The affected
compounds were 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, rra/w-l,2-dichloroethane, carbon
tetrachloride, 1,2-dicholoropropane, c/j-l,3-dichloropropene, dibromochloromethane, and
?rartj-l,3-dichloropropene. These compounds were not observed in the samples; therefore,
there is minimal impact to the data quality. Results of the blind audit sample No. C-139-03
is presented in Table 5-8.
5.3.4 Surrogate Recoveries
Surrogate recoveries were 79 ± 6 percent RSD for toluene-dg, 88 ± 6 percent RSD
for benzene-dg, and 103 ± 16 percent for 1,2-dichloroethane-4^. The spiked surrogate
4-bromofluorobenzene averaged 145 ± 7 percent RSD which was slightly above the
130 percent objective. Surrogate recoveries are presented in Table 5-9.
5-12
-------
TABLE 5-8. VOST AUDIT SAMPLE RESULTS
Sample: VOC Mix C-139-03
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Methylene chloride
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane (total
/-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichlooethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Accuracy (%)a
118
149
131
142
123
119
117
135
116
132
136
131
127
151
126
103
aBased on theoretical concentration of 400 ng per trap.
5-13
-------
TABLE 5-9. VOST SURROGATE RECOVERIES
Sample
TR BL TNX 1077
TR BL T/C 1078
FD BL TNX 1075
FD BL T/C 1076
Pair 2 TNX 1069
Pair 2 T/C 1070
Pair 4 TNX 1073
Pair 4 T/C 1074
Pair 2 TNX 2069
Pair 2 T/C 2070
Average:
Precision (RSD):
VOST surrogate recoveries (%)a
1 ,2-Dichloroethane-rf4
115
94
113
109
106
88
140
84
93
92
103% R
± 16% RSD
Benzene-rf^
92
84
90
88
95
84
80
94
91
86
88% R
± 6% RSD
4-Bromofluorobenzene
130
155
139
127
140
149
155
151
156
152
145% Rb
± 7% RSD
Toluene-rfg
76
76
76
78
77
85
77
89
76
78
79% R
± 6% RSD
aBased on spiked concentration of 250 ng per trap.
"Value is above the 70 to 130 percent recovery objective of the QA Plan.
5-14
-------
APPENDIX A.
FIELD DATA FORMS
A.1 GRINDING/SCREENING OPERATION FIELD DATA FORMS
A. 1.1 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Inlet PM/PM-10
A. 1.2 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Outlet PM/PM-10
A. 1.3 Grinding/Screening Ambient PM-10
A.2 KILN FIELD DATA FORMS
A.2.1 Kiln PM/PM-10/Condensible PM
A.2.2 Kiln Multiple Metals/PM
A.2.3 Kiln Semivolatile Organic Compounds
A.2.4 Kiln Volatile Organic Compounds
A.2.5 Kiln Inorganic/Organic Gases
A.2.6 Kiln HCI/HF/PM
A.3 DRYER FIELD DATA FORMS
A.3.1 Dryer Organic Gases
-------
A
-------
A.1 GRINDING/SCREENING OPERATION FIELD DATA FORMS
A
-------
A
-------
A. 1.1 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Inlet PM/PM-10
A
-------
A
6
-------
U311U
"dH3i
d. "dNll XOfl
JUMVS
d. "dH31
U39NUNI
A
BH •«!
OVA dwnd
co
o
•o
O
•A
Vn
Vis
\r\
N
V
n
\I\
Vr
INI
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), lnH,0)
K
Vv
-r
^-
Si
rs
N
(VJ
M
\,
a
3
UJ «i
-i
s
csfsCi
cc
r-
o
Mr^
CP^c
^
te>
i
i.~
•50
•5
\i
S)
-J
CK TIME
(24-hr.)
<» ~
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln OLai-k Nu._3
Run No.
J_
Set up person (s) :.
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
j.
Sampling Train No. pi O "
Sample Box No.
Date ft -
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm
_in.Hg vacuun
Date/Time // ~
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
.(Liner-Glass)
-D0n Bypass
onnector
1st Impinger
(Short -stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector, (B)
3rd Impinges^ GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.
mLs
H,O
100 mLs
. y
.Empty
-200 g indicating
silica gel
7T. 7
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A
8
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Baghouse Inlet
Run No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By ff\ .
Sampling Train No. jrIu ~~ **- Sample Box No.
Sample box recovery person(s)
Probe recovery person(s):.
/o Received By J. /r\>- C.
Date/Time //-? -?J //5"S
Date: H- 9 -f j
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger: 1st 2nd
Final Wt.(q) SI 1-1 S7C-?
Initial Wt.(q)
-------
FILE NAME - baginl
RUN # - baginl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT * - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F )=
Average Delta H ( in H20 )=
Average Delta P ( in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20>
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:56:0:
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min )=
ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min>
, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
847.042
898.530
1 .027
0.001
52.878
52.915
29.13
-0.37
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
54
0.67
0.790
59
28 .84
28.68
0.8733
94.5
0.84
120.0
0.172
36.0
36.0
7.07
2,967
20,974
20,753
20,439
0.4604
0.1340
0.1305
23.47
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 2.279735E+37
13.399
10
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - baginl
RUN # - baginl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601 .01,.05 .01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 23.985
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 25.443
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)= 0.0000
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 1.497
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 1.498
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 740
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -9
Percent Oxygen= 21.0
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.0
Percent Water= , 1.5
Average Meter Temperature ( C )= 12
Average Delta H (mm H20 )= 17.0
Average Delta P (mm H20 )= 20.1
Average Stack Temperature ( C)= 15
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.84
Wet Molecular Uleight= 28.68
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )= 4.4014
% Isokinetic= 94.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 120.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm )= 4.37
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )= 0.914
Stack Axis #2 ( Meters )= 0.914
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 0.657
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 904
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 594
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 588
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 579
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.4604
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )= 307.3
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 299.3
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 10.66
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:56:04
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 1.701412E+38
30727.2
A 11
P/V\-»o
-------
FILE NAME - baginl
RUN # - baginl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.OL.05.01
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Delta P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
in. H20)
0.240
0.540
0.540
0.750
1 .100
1 .100
0.600
1 .200
0.960
0.700
0 .830
0.920
(in. H20)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
(F)
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
In(F)
57
57
57
57
57
57
56
57
57
57
52
51
Out(F)
• 53
54
54
54
54
54
53
53
54
54
48
46
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:56:01
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)=
Impinger Blank (mg/ml )= 0.0000
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.3705
Final
(g)
9.2394
0.0000
ig/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.2889
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
108.8606
0.0000
0.0000
. Blank Wt.
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
120.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0816
Net Wt
(g)
.3788
.0000
A 12
Fm-i
-------
FILE NAME - baginlt
RUN # - baginlt
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 847.042
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 898.530
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)= 0.001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 52.878
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 52.915
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.13
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.37
Percent Oxygen^ 21 .0
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.0
Percent Water= 1.5
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 54
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 0.67
Average Delta P ( in H20 )= 0.790
Average Stack Temperature ( F )= 59
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.84
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.68
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )= 0.8733
% Isokinetic= 94.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 120.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )= 0.172
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 36.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )= 36.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 7.07
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,967
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 20,974
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 20,753
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 20,439
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 4.5862
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 1.3347
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 1.3001
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 233.80
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-05-1994 11:15:56
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% (
% 1 .701412E+38
133 .4729
13
-------
I
I
o
3
3
£
d. "dWHI
380Hd
d. "
xoa
d. "dwai
tQSNkdWI
"OVA dWfW
tu
UJ
cc
S?«°
gi*
£g-
UJ UJ —Z.
" 5- =
|5<
o
i£l
e iSc]
ii
0
M^
SO
a-
r-
A
0
e,
n
vD
U,
0
o
D
V/i
vO
QOfe'
b~^-
ALA
r-|^
o
•Po
00
0
O
O
N
O
V)
X
J
^
ft
A 14
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: K±lu SLack No .— 3" 13 33 k a Hi { J ^ / f •/ tf Z
Run No.
Sampling Train No. p 10 '
Sample Box No.
Date //-?-?-?
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
^.
J
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm
Date/Time
_in.Hg vacuum
f 3 /SJL
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short -stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinqer (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impincrer (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector £/// - Z.
* Initial Weights
* (arams)**
Empty Loaded
* Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No. :
Sh8
too ., o
H,O
100 mLs 7/2-S~ ^7(~.o
H,0
Empty 9 '4* /-/
-200 q indicatinq ^7 -f
silica qel
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 15
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA f^/- (~
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Baghouse Inlet
Run No. pC. Sampling Train No. r 10 ~ JL-
Transfer for Recovery:
* . . i ~T
Received By \j ^
Relinquished By /V/t-^ yo-^
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe recovery person (s) :
T
Sample Box No.
Date/Time //-2ill_
/TOO
Date: //-f-y-3
Date: I/-9-H
BACK HALF RECOVERY
1st
.2nd
rd
(
-------
FILE NAME - bagin2
RUN # - bagin2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 899.746
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 926.755
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)= 0.001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 27.738
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 27.028
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.13
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.37
Percent Oxygen= 21.0
Percent Carbon Dioxide^ 0.0
Percent Water= 1 .5
Average Meter Temperature (F )= 68
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 0.67
Average Delta P (in H20 )= 0.790
Average Stack Temperature ( F)= 64
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.84
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.68
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )= 0.8733
% Isokinetic= 97.0
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 60.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )= 0.172
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 36.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )= 36.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 7.07
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,980
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 21,065
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 20,663
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 20,351
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.2340
Particulate Loading,, Dry Std. (gr/scf )= 0.1333
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 0.1287
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 23.25
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:59:35
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 2.268297E+37
13.3319
17
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - bagin2
RUN # - bagin2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min )=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:59:3;
Average Meter Temperature ( C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight= •
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min )=
m/min)=
, Cubic m/min)=
, Cubic m/min )=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
25.477
26.242
1 .027
0.0000
0.785
0.765
740
-9
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
20
17.0
20.1
18
28.84
28.68
4 .4014
97.0
0.84
60.0
4.37
0.914
0.914
0.657
908
596
585
576
0.2340
305.7
295.2
10.56
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 1.701412E+38
30573.
A 18
-------
FILE NAME - bagin2
RUN # - bagin2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.OU05
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:59:38
01
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.240
0.540
0.540
0.750
1 .100
1 .100
0.600
1 .200
0.960
0.700
0.830
0.920
Delta H
(in. H20)
0 .67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
Stack
(F)
64
64
63
64
64
63
64
64
63
63
63
63
T
In(F
71
71
71
71
71
71
70
70
69
68
66
65
Meter T
) Out(F)
69
68
68
68
68
67
67
67
66
65
65
64
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.3323
Final
(g)
86.4034
0.0000
Blank ( mg/fnl )=
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.2874
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
86.2143
0.0000
0.0000
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
97.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0449
Net Wt
(g)
.1891
.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
A 19
-------
FILE NAME - bagin2t
RUN # - bagin2t
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT Ht - 4601.0^05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Uleight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-05-1994 11:17:4C
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min )=
ft/min )=
Cubic ft/min)-
Cubic ft/min )=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
899.746
926.755
1 .027
0.001
27.738
27.028
29.13
-0.37
21.0
0.0
1 .5
68
0.67
0.790
64
28 .84
28.68
0.8733
97 .0
0.84
60.0
0.172
36.0
36.0
7.07
2,980
21 ,065
20,663
20,351
4.1066
2.3398
2.2596
408.08
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 1 .701412E+38
233.980
20
-------
I
4
xj
^
^
f>
>r
*
vb
«
z
Ci
>
^.
C5
V
^S
\
*-«.
o
«,
o
p
L3
ts
a.
V-
NJ
uanid
j. '-dual
380Ud
xos
3TdWVS
H39NUWI
"OVA dNIU
RENTIAL
lnH,0)
ICE
FFE
H),
DIF
(A
c-
0
^^
% £
LOCK TIME
-hr.)
§1
2
A
r-
O
sP
y
Od
O
A,
Vo
>^-
V-vo
\s\\r>
MJ
X
^•^^y.
>v
tfe
U O
v-,^u^}o
^*i jk ^* ^3k >^
vD
V,
A
o
•o
u
.0
\S
I
VJ
-J
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Stick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kilu OCaU: No. 3
Run No.
~~>
Set up person(s)
Transfer to Sampler:'
Relinquished By
Sampling Train No.
J~^ /rt^ £.—
Sample Box No.
Date H-t-93
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm @
_in. Hg vacuun
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.
50 mLs
H2O
100 mLs
H20
Empty
-200 g indicating
silica gel
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 22
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugaa: Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Baghouse Inlet
Sampling Train No.
Run No. ^
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s)
Probe recovery person (s)
~-2~
Sample Box No.
Received By
Date/Time // "//-?3 /o
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger :
Final Wt. (g) ,
Initial Wt . (g) ^
Net Wt . (g)
1st 2nd
^.f. 1 3~7S.£.
A? p-*j
i *
3rd , 4th
YLJL. 1 7/7. £
^ ' £, /,9 ~7c(o &
.3 /a .1
5th
\ Total Condensate
6th
Collected
7th
(g) :
8th-l
/S-0
8th-2
]
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution: MethChlrd
Components Rinsed: ** filter support,
connector U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
-Before Rinses
*** lth-3th impingers, filter holder back, 45/90°
After Rinses
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution:
Components Rinsed****:
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
001
_?002
.3003
IN-STK FILTER
Acetone Acetone
Acetone
probe liner, filter holder front
w/Acetone
Filter
Description and Color:
COMMENTS:
A 23
-------
FILE NAME - baginS
RUN # - bagin3
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.0^05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P ( in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 13:01:0;
926.807
953.435
1 .027
0.001
27.347
27.464
29.13
-0 .37
21 .0
0.0
1.5 **Saturated Stack**
52
0.67
0.790
55 -
28.84
28.68
0 .8733
97.8
0.84
60.0
0.172
36.0
36.0
7.07
2,957
20,899
20,828
20,513
0.2242
0.1257
0.1233
22.10
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12%
% 2.138926E+37
12.571
A 24
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - baginS
RUN # - baginS
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure ( mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 13:01:03
Average Meter Temperature ( C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (C)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (mm )=
Stack Axis #1 ( Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
26.243
26.997
1 .027
0 .0000
0.774
0.778
740
-9
21 .0
0.0
1.5 **Saturated Stack**
11
17.0
20.1
13
28.84
28.68
4.4014
97.8
0.84
60.0
4.37
0.914
0.914
0.657
901
592
590
581
0.2242
288.3
282.9
10.03
Corr. to 7* 02 &
* 1.701412E+38
28829.3
A 25
-10
-------
FILE NAME - baginS
RUN # - baginS
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 13:01:04
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Delta P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
in. H20)
0.240
0.540
0.540
0.750
1 .100
1 .100
0.600
1 .200
0.960
0.700
0.830
0.920
(in. H20)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0 .67
0.67
(F)
56
56
56
56
56
56
55
55
55
54
54
54
In(F)
57
57
57
56
55
54
54
53
52
51
50
49
Out(F)
54
54
53
53
52
51
51
51
50
49
48
48
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
1
(
0
0
15
0
Final
(g)
.0000
.3241
Final
(g)
.8773
.0000
mg/ml )=
Wt
Wt
1
0
.
0
0
15
0
Tare Wt .
(g)
.0000
.2794
Tare Wt .
(g)
.6978
.0000
Blank Wt.
0.
0.
(
68
0
(g)
0000
0000
Vol .
ml)
.0 0
.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0447
Net Wt
(g)
.1795
.0000
.0000
A 26
-------
FILE NAME - bagin3t
RUN # - baginSt
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT tt - 4601 .01_.05 .01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H ( in H20)=
Average Delta P ( in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time ( Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-05-1994 11:20:19
926.807
953.435
1 .027
0.001
27.347
27 .464
29.13
-0.37
21 .0
0.0
1.5 **Saturated Stack**
52
0.67
0.790
55
28.84
28.68
0.8733
97.8
0.84
60.0
0 .172
36.0
36.0
7.07
2,957
20,899
20,828
20,513
4.5845
2.5707
2.5223
451 .93
Corr . to 7% 02 &
% 1 .701412E+38
257.0683
A 27
-------
A. 1.2 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Outlet PM/PM-10
A 28
-------
A 29
-------
do ",
nan id
do "dW31
aaoud
d. "dW31 XOS
JUWVS
d. "dW3i
U30NUWI
OH 'U|
"OVA dwnd
o
>
v-
ei. o
-v
\,
1
CTjfcO
5
I
M
c-
= l<
&
Kl
K
ts z
SI
£ 5
N
o
«
rA
g~
51
UJ
E
CO
vO
xpo
O
A
o
rr.l
-r
T
N
A 30
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. /
Set up person (s) : j"^,
Transfer to Sampler: •
Relinquished By" l/s—
Sampling Train No. f*rV 4- Sample Box No.
Date //-
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received
cfm
in.Hg vacuum
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
PT-nho — (T i n m- fl ^Rg)
p^mal ^ Proh» -^"Lank-nff
a^S DVPQOD-
FiLtfi^-Holdai: Fioiit
Fi I.,t7^=-r HI il flt1' 1 — HnrVr
1st Impinger
(Short- stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinqer (GBS) T-/1O
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinqei/rTC5BS)
U-Connector (C)
4th impinaer (Mod-GBS) JT'Sc.^
Impinqer Outlet Connector (AW "3.2.
*
*
* Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I D No •
;
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Cre«k, Ohio
Sampling Location: Baghouse Inlet
Run No. I
Transfer for Recovery:
Sampling Train No. / /^ " / Sample Box No.
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person (s)_:
Probe recovery person (s) :. -*~ •
Received By
Date/Time //
Date:
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
1st
2nd
3rd
- 7 5 7V, 7
f/y.f) <
1-3
Impinger:
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution: MethChlrd
Components Rinsed: ** filter support,
connector U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th-l
8th-
6.ry./
Jt-.Z
[ Total Condensate Collected (q) .-
-Before Rinses
*** ith-3th impingers, filter holder back, 45/90'
After Rinses
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number :
Sample Bottle Tare Wt . (g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt . (g)
Rinse Solution
/ 006
f7\ V
•X V *7
Acetone
/ 007
QfJ
/ j /. 7
Acetone
/ 008
IN-STK FILTER
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. (g)
Rinse Solution: Acetone
Components Rinsed****: probe liner, filter holder front
FOter
Description and Colon
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
w/Acetone
COMMENTS:
A 32
-------
FILE NAME - bagoutl
RUN at - bagoutl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Final Meter Volume"(Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F )=
Average Delta H ( in H20 )=
Average Delta P (in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (F )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular U)eight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20 )=
°< Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time ( Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis 4*1 ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:46:17
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Cubic ft/min>
Cubic ft/min )=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
708.505
888 .673
1 .010
0.001
181 .970
175.437
29.27
-0.37
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
76
0.67
1 .990
58
28.84
28 .68
1.4092
92.1
0.84
350.0
0.146
32.0
32.0
5.59
4,773
26,656
26,541
26,140
0.0027
0.0002
0.0002
0.05
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12%
% 4.042677E+34
0.023
A 33
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - bagoutl
RUN ft - bagoutl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT ft - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:46:
Average Meter Temperature ( C )=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm )=
Stack Axis ftl (Meters )=
Stack Axis ft2 (Meters )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
20.062
25.164
1 .010
0.0000
5.153
4.968
743
-9
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
25
17.0
50.5
15
28 .84
28.68
7.1019
92.1
0.84
350.0
3.71
0.813
0.813
0.519
1 ,455
755
752
740
0.0027
0.5
0.5
0.02
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12
% 9.270783E+37
54
A 34
v-< o
-------
FILE NAME - bagoutl
RUN # - bagoutl
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:46:l<
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta -P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
in. H20) (in. H20 ) (F) In(F) Out( F )
1 .900
2.300
2.300
1 .800
1 .800
1 .800
1 .900
2.100
1 .900
2.100
Blank
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.2894
Final
(g)
101 .3541
0.0000
( mg/ml )=
57
57
57
57
57
59
59
60
60
60
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.2868
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
101 .3540
0.0000
0.0000
63
76
79
81
81
82
83
84
85
85
Blank Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
56.0
0.0
62
65
70
73
74
75
76
77
79
79
. Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0026
Net Wt
(g)
0 .0001
0.0000
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Impinger Blank (mg/ml )= 0.0000
A 35
\-/o
-------
FILE NAME - bagoutlt
RUN tt - bagoutlt
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 708.505
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 888.673
Meter Factor= 1.010
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)= 0.001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 181.970
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 175.437
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.27
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.37
Percent Oxygen= 21.0
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.0
Percent Water= 1.5
Average Meter Temperature ( F)= 76
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 0.67
Average Delta P (in H20)= 1.990
Average Stack Temperature ( F )= 58
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.84
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.68
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )= 1.4092
% Isokinetic= 92.1
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time ( Minutes)= 350.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )= 0.146
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 32.0
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches)= 32.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 5.59
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 4,773
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 26,656
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 26,541
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 26,140
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0133
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )= 0.0012
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 0.0011
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.26
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-05-1994 11:23:
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12
% 1.986977E+35
0.11
A 36
-------
Q
^
t
o
o
£
^
^j
I
do "did
U3I1U
d. "«
380U
"dwnxoe
ruwvs
d. "dWil
U39NUWI
BH •»
"3VA
2
-i
UJ HJ '—*
ill
— ..5
M
tjs
rts
r- r
A
N
V
m
to
V,
N
Wvfo
vS)
vo
00
V
Qd
1?
'5^^
CD
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. <£-
Set up person (s) :.
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
Sampling Train No. p/0 - ^_
Sample Box No.
Date n-
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm
_in.Hg vacuu
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
Prnb* (Lixiaj= — m rvss)
Pomalc — Pi'obe — Blank-Off
-90" Bypass
FilLtij. — Huldtji — Frost
M)IIJI i^'"^rr° i^onnector"
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinqer (GBS) f-f(2.
U-Connector . (B)
3rd Imoinae^fGBS) R'l1,
U-Connector (C)
4th Imoinaer (Mod-GBS) -^^^
Impinqer Outlet Connector ^A H ~-2^
*
*
* Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No. :
5^y
-*-w mLs
H,O
100 mLs
H2O
'S3 Empty
•^v.^
37*^-200 q indicatinq
silica qel
Initial Weights
(grams) **
Empty Loaded
V7o.? S7o.y
£/Jyi
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No.
Client/Source:
Source Location:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Beldsn Brick Company
Sugar Creek, Ohio
Baghouse Inlet
Sampling Train No.
Run No. 2-
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s) :
Probe recovery person(s):
0 " 3
Sample Box No.
Received By
Date/Time
Date:
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
2nd
3rd
yu.
1-3
Impinger:
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution: MethChlrd
Components Rinsed: ** filter support,
connector U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
4th
5th
6th
7th
[ Total Condensate Collected (g);
8th-l 8th-2
AF.L
-Before Rinses
*** lth-3th impingers, filter holder back, 45/90°
After Rinses
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution:
Components Rinsed****:
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
•Z006
2. £7. 3
Acetone
^007
008
•97.
Acetone
IN-STK FILTER
Acetone
probe liner, filter holder front
w/Acetone
Filter
Description and Color:
COMMENTS:
A 39
-------
FILE NAME - bagout2
RUN ft - bagout2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT ft - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 898.745
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 1110.540
Meter Factor= 1.010
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)= 0.001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 213.913
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 206.567
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.27
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.37
Percent Oxygen= 21.0
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.0
Percent Water= 1.5
Average Meter Temperature (F )= 76
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 0.67
Average Delta P (in H20 )= 1.950
Average Stack Temperature (F )= 56
Dry Molecular Weight= 28.84
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.68
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )= 1.3949
% Isokinetic= 91.1
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 420.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )= 0.146
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 32.0
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )= 32.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 5.59
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 4,716
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 26,337
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 26,322
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 25,925
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0027
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0002
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0002
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.04
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12=51:0
Corr . to 7% 02 & 123
% 3.428217E+34
0.02C
A 40
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - bagout2
RUN # - bagout2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:51:10
Average Meter Temperature (C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight^
Wet Molecular Uleight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
25.449
31 .446
1 .010
0.0000
6.057
5.849
743
-9
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
24
17.0
49.5
14
28.84
28.68
7.0301
91 .1
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 420.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm )= 3.71
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.813
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )= 0.813
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 0.519
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 1,437
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 746
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 745
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 734
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0027
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )= 0.5
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 0.5
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.02
No Back Half Analysis
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12%
% 7.861686E+37
46.2
A 41
-------
FILE NAME - bagout2
RUN ft - bagout2
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT ft - 4601.01.05.01
Point ft
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Delta P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
in. H20)
1 .700
1 .900
2.000
1 .900
2.100
1 .900
1 .800
1 .800
1 .800
2.300
2.300
1 .900
(in. H20)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
(F)
50
53
53
56
58
58
58
58
58
58
58
58
In(F)
62
70
76
78
80
81
82
82
84
85
85
85
Out(F)
54
61
68
71
70
72
74
75
79
80
80
80
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-04-1994 12:51:1
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.2882 0.2861 O.OOOO 0.0021
Final
(g)
PROBE RINSE 85.1247
IMPINGERS 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml )=
Impinger Blank (mg/ml )= 0.0000
t. Tare Wt .
(g)
85.1241
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
98.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0006
0.0000
A 42
-------
FILE NAME - bagout2t
RUN # - bagout2t
LOCATION - baghouse
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.0U05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H ( in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight^
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
05-05-1994 11:25:34
898.745
1110.540
1 .010
0.001
213.913
206.567
29.27
-0.37
21 .0
0.0
1 .5
76
0.67
1 .950
56
28.84
28.68
1 .3949
91 .1
0 .84
420.0
0.146
32.0
32.0
5.59
4,716
26,337
26,322
25,925
0.0109
0.0008
0.0008
0.18
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% (
% 1 .383142E+35
0.0813
A 43
-------
A. 1.3 Grinding/Screening Ambient PM-10
A 44
-------
A 45
-------
SOP No.: EET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
' ^
>i v
x>;
o
z
"o
cu
Q- Q
CD
LU
CO
o
LU -•
CO
UJ I
cr '^
(— ^
to \»,
LJU .^»
D
-5.
o>
"S
Q
CL
£
a
CO
O)
c
UL
9
3
.
O
Q.
I
CD
3
(0
CD
a
jj
"S
E
o
a
CD
(D
«!
° rf "o
S= <-> CO
CO
O
>
O
a.
o
"5
cu Q-
i: ^b
« Q-
00
OJ
^) Q_
il
O ---
CO O
CO ry
Q) "T~
Q-_c
re ^
P a.
> *
I"
_Q)
CL
CO
CO
'NJ
^
K
N.
MN
Ts
rs
^^
•50
CO
(D
O
O
CD
a.
O)
o
II
Q."
CO
t/5
3
a.
CL
I
a.
a
CL
-------
SOP No.: EET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
* *'
ffl
LU
h-
Z)
u
IT
LU
in
LU
cr
t-
(/>
LU
*
O)
I
9
3
2
5 i
T
c/5
£ o
5 ~-
_g
U.
g
ro
S a-
CO
CD
Q) "T"
CO _
O Q.
_CD
!;§
Ii
_cu
Q.
CO
N
•M
SA
N
Kj
'M
"3s
N
^^
M
•vi
V
j<:
O
O
I
o
LL
Q.
CD
CO
a.
CO
o
o
CO
CO
c
(0
D)
C
T3
•o
CD
Q.
a.
CTJ
"5
m
o
O
CC
n
C£)
CNJ
O)
O
I!
5
o"
CD
CD
h-
o>
c
_0)
CO
'co
O
o
0)
ca
•D
(0
Q.
I
II
a."
-------
cwr i\o.: bET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
^i
CO
Q
m
LU
U
o:
ai
to
LU
cc
LU
a
_c
§
a>
Q
_O
LL
JtD
O.
CO
a>
CL
D)
C
Q^
0
w
3
VI
a
O
a
m
CO
£
5-2
_o
LL
CU CL
^ ~-b
« Q-
ex
II5
01 Q.
3 •—•
co O
tO ^y
CU ~P
03
0 CL
o
LL
n.
co
CO
N
Si
INl
INi
M
•Ni
D)
O
n
5
o"
a>
en
n
oT
TJ
C
CD
CL
i
-------
SOP No.: EET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
"V
o
2
N
'ml
:'«Nl
O
Nl
K
"vj
^~
K
•si
Nl
K
K
K
Sol
^!
IK
.0
"5
i_
0) Q."
S o.
w
eu
(X
_OJ Q.
iZ
°
V,
MS
Ms
M
_m
1 °
Jl
2- ""
I"
u.
CC
CO
N.
6
o
to
to
CO
CJ
O
g a
K
CD
CJ3
en
CM
O"
CO
ID
O
O
to
n'
Q_
en
r^
cr>
**—
II
oT
_o)
CO
'to
O
o
0)
to
c
a.
•o
5
of
CL
I
II
-------
SOP No.: EET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
o
0)
"o" .2
"- re
Q- Q
CD
01
LU
§V
I
c
LL
a
a.
£
a
to
CO
£
2
(0
m
0 n °
cr w co
O
5-5
5 -5-
o
fc
si a*
— —to
CO
-si
•N
V,
^
I
X.
Vv.
\
io CT
« z:
Ol
"
2 6
Si
-, 0)
LL
o
%
£•
5
CO
£
^
X
NN
NfS
N
^
\
M
(M
o
o
o
LL
C.
ro
CO
o
75
"o
o
CO
CO
a
0)
-a
o
a.
c.
re
0)
o
Q
c\j
o
O
O
(D
a>
O)
II
aT
o
o
oj
2
1o
i
c
a
5
DL~
DL
I
II
a."
o
CL
-------
01
Jr ™
CL Q
.t
^1
LU
LO
LU
_D)
I
u.
o
a>
E
o
«
CD
SOP No.: EET-640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
*J
«\
>.
c
_o
"to
c
E
L.
_GJ
03
1
_O
t
CO
a.
1?
5 l-i
c/5
o"
S "5
If
2? —
P •— •
cu CL
LL
0} T*
^•.s
"ro ^^
0 CL
!_„
r^
k_
_0)
"2 °
1 -
5 *
LL
O
Q)
§-
5
CO
^
»
-^.
•N)
'
^
,
_
5-
"
^
,
.,.
s
*
-
t^
x
s
X
-
CO
X
_^
^
«
t~°
r^1
'"**
-
*
IN)
|
.5J
~a
1 —
5"
o
o
— 1
£1
0
[ 1
-D
-------
O .
0)
o —
k. (^
a_ Q
UJ
o
C
<
D)
X
a>
a.
D
in
en
a>
a
_u
'S
E
o
R
CO
^^,.. ^^ i -640
Revision No.: 0
Date: 04/09/93
Page 16 of 21
^
>>
^
^
c
_o
13
c
E
k.
~
03
5
_o
^
CD
E
TO
"I
Q.
O
*
^
X
-5"
—
v
— ^
-
Vt?
~>.
^
!
0)
Tc
(—
s.
,
O
0
— 1
£
O
LL
T3
OJ
Q.
£
5
«
o
2"
a.
re
a*
re
oT
D."
of
i
,_
ii
c
Q.
o
C_
"
-------
A.2 KILN FIELD DATA FORMS
A 53
-------
A 54
-------
A.2.1 Kiln PM/PM-10/Condensible PM
A 55
-------
A 56
-------
CO
^
^
X
H
O
O
UJ
U.
/
k
\
NOZZLE DIA.
\
ROBE NO.
^
}
O
f
f
"' •
S
1
1—
a
ASSUMED MC
«
^
HAND TYPE _
ROBE LENQTI
\
•+^
^
o-
i
k-
^*
^.
•*.
METER AH St
IX
frv
0
AMPLE BOX N
V)
C
VJ
f
t,
r-
A.
-vj
z
g
o
UJ
METER CORF
\
\
i
X
I
u
0-
V
\
L
<
PITOT NO
*
2
C
U.
J
EMP. CONTRC
^
\5
vj
X
?
^«
rTf*
c-
0
*-
u
y
PITOT COEFF
X.
9
EMP. METER
o
t
!
*'
i
Ul
-,
S
-X
M
?M
Ul
c
1
u.
IT
0-
C
h-
U
C
5
m
I
O
c
u
_i
0.
\
J
{
X
§
H
/
"T
I
3 ELEVATION
SITE TO BARC
Vn
1 —
1
c
c
^
i
Qo
•xj
i
cc
\
)
c
o
£
O
o.
m
CORRECTED
^
t
i
c
§
a
z
cr
u
H
Q
a
K
III
(0
(C
UJ
1
l~l
EMATIC (
O
H
1
§
Ul
c
Q.
y
<
*-
co
-~->
i
C
i
\il
0.
;
i
cc.
J
1
in
t
i,
-i
-
D
>•
<
h-
5
Q.
g.
in
CJ
UJ
X
CJ
UJ
_J
0
h—
-J
uT
-j
z
u.
z
u.
~J
s
N
|
UJ
| PASS/FAI
o
«•*
«
Al
u
UJ
u
<
1
_j
IT
_j
•c
X
-J
iZ
_,
Z
3.
u.
_l
z
(V
UJ
Z
1 PASS/FAI
CO
UJ
X
o
2
Z
<
cc
UJ
a.
z
u.
— J
z
_J
_l
•e
z
t
* N
^
Vs
\
HT
X
UJ
H^
!h
Al
Al
M
in
Al
z
-^
*
\
5
u.
u
VOLUMES
_<
«t
z
•c
z
DIFFERENCE
< CHECKS
2
z
<
cc
H-
UJ
a.
X
v»
u.
2
z
u7
_,
Z
(M
UJ
Z
Al
Al
z"
=J
u
•c
u.
u
Ul
o
LiJ
f
3
»J
D
>
«J
|
i
C
_l
c
E
L
UJ
S
=>
_j
Z
u.
.j
<
Ul
3
u
Ul
2
DIFFERENCE
=j UJ
u. a:
A 57
-------
o
£
vs;
t
£
2
ii
^
V)
cr
i
d. "dlBi
Harm
j. "dual
380Ud
j. "dwai xoa
JUNVS
j. "
U39NUWI
OH 'MI
'•OVA dwru
AfU*
NO
I
V
•O
vD
v-)
•03
fn
\S Mi
r-
vi)
vo
vj
ro
A
V)
re tj-
N
A 58
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No.
_f_ Sampling Train No.
Set up person(s) : J". /)1 ^
Transfer to Sampler:
Sample Box No.
Date //-/^-«y
1 1
Relinquished By
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm
_in.Hg vacuum
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger/*fteBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.
LP?
mLs
H2O
100 mLs
H2O
Empty
-200 g indicating
silica gel
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 59
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No.3 -
.'l* 5V4tk -
Run No. /
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s):.
Probe recovery person(s):
Sampling Train No. ^> (/ I Sample Box No. Oil
Received By J~ /ft-*
Date/Time
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger :
Final Wt. (g) .
Initial Wt. (g)
Net Wt. (g)
1st
*Z~£r ->
JL.->
2nd 3rd
JS&.d Y7/.7
^S74.JT ^7o.f
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpl
RUN # - kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet>
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml )=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:35:30
Average
Average
Average
Average
Meter
Delta
Delta
Stack
Dry
Wet
Molecular
Molecular
Temperature ( F)=
H ( in H20)=
P ( in H20)=
Temperature (F )=
Weight=
Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20 >
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time ( Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)-
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight ( g )=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
327.801
369.465
1 .027
0.001
42.789
41 .464
29.13
-0.12
17.6
2.2
37.5
4.1
71
0.67
0.082
380
29.06
28.60
0.2663
106.8
0 .84
90.0
0.342
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,152
37,001
22,636
21 ,711
0.0033
0.0012
0.0007
0.23
Corr . to 7% 02 &
0.0050 O.0067
A 61
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - kilnpl
RUN #• — kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT ft - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml )=
Percent Water=
9
Average Meter Temperature (C )=
Average Delta H (mm H20 )=
Average Delta P (mm H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (C )=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:35:^
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight^
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
9.282
10.462
1 .027
0.0000
1 .212
1 .174
740
-3
17.6
2.2
37.5
4.1
22
17.0
2.1
193
29.06
28 .60
1 .3423
106.8
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (mm )=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min>
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.84
90.0
8.69
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
351
1 ,048
641
615
0.0033
2.8
1 .6
0.10
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12
11.5 15
A 62
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpl
RUN # - kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta P Delta H Stack T
(in. H20) (in. H20)
Meter T
0.010
0.140
0.170
0.065
0.030
0.010
0.135
0.125
0.080
0.060
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
(F)
107
439
375
417
432
246
444
447
447
445
In(F)
65
71
73
74
74
74
76
78
77
77
Out(F)
63
65
67
67
68
69
70
71
71
72
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:35:32
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction Final
(g)
PROBE RINSE 92.9948
IMPINGERS 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)=
Final
(g)
117.3744
1 .1037
Wt. Tare Wt
(.9)
117.3722
1 .1022
. Blank Wt .
(g)
167.0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0015
Wt
Tare
(g)
92.9930
0.0000
0.0001
Wt
Vol
(ml)
160.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0018
0.0000
Impinger Blank ( mg/ml )= 0.0000
A 63
-------
FILE NAME - kilnptl
RUN # - kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F )=
Average Delta H (in H20 )=
Average Delta P (in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:30=3:
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min)=
ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
327.801
369.465
1.027
0.001
42.789
41 .464
29.13
-0.12
17.6
2.2
37.5
4.1
71
0.67
0.082
380
29.06
28.60
0.2663
106.8
0.84
90.0
0.342
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,152
37,001
22,636
21 ,711
0.0055
0.0020
0.0012
0.38
Corr. to 7% 02 &
0.0084 0.011
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate Weight ( g)= 0.0177
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )= 0.0066
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 0.0039
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 1.22
Percent Impinger Catch= 69.0
m A 64
0.0270
0.03S
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - kilnptl
RUN # - kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 9.282
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 10.462
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)= 0.0000
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 1.212
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 1.174
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 740
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -3
Percent Oxygen= 17.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Moisture Collected (ml )= 37.5
Percent Water= 4.1
Average Meter Temperature (C )= 22
Average Delta H (mm H20 )= 17.0
Average Delta P (mm H20 )= 2.1
Average Stack Temperature (C )= 193
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.60
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )= 1.3423
% Isokinetic= 106.8
Pitot Coefficient= 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 90.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm )= 8.69
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )= 1.727
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 1.727
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 2.983
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 351
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 1,048
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 641
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 615
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0055
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (-mg/cu m )= 4.7
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 2.7
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.17
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:30:34
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% i
19.2 25.5
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m):
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
Percent Impinger Catch=
A 65
0.0
15.1
8.8
0.55
69.0
62.0
82.1
-------
FILE NAME - kilnptl
RUN # - kilnpl
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT * - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 ll:30:3i
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.010
0.140
0.170
0.065
0.030
0.010
0.135
0.125
0.080
0.060
Delta H
(in. H20)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
Stack
(F)
107
439
375
417
432
246
444
447
447
445
T
In(F
65
71
73
74
74
74
76
78
77
77
Meter T
) Out( F )
63
65
67
67
68
69
70
71
71
72
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(9)
117.3744
1 .1037
Final
(g)
92.9948
98.9282
( mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
117.3722
1 .1022
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
92.9930
98.9160
0.0001
. Blank Wt.
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
160.0 0
90.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0022
0.0015
Net Wt
(g)
.0018
.0122
A 66
-------
Q C
^
\s
s
S
— o
=. o
§ 5
5 5
? S S
5 uS y
<
Q
Q
LLJ
U.
0
c-
O O O
z z z
a a a
K
LU
U
O
§' O
^
o -
AJ
O
Al
|
u
o
C
CO
UI
X
o
3
z
2
«c
tt»
z
g
UU
—1
Z
I
r™
i
t3-
V
5
S
UI
p
5»
.Al
Al
v
yi 1
'
W*
Al
^
if
3
»
0
O
r?
o
o
a
u.
u
M
C9
UJ
U
!
H-
a.
^r
03
ta
UI
3
»
g
i
i=
z
UJ
u
s
5
3c
C
i
z
i
u.
_J
z
"5
EC
J
UJ
-
tf>
Al
3>
Al
a
a:
1
3
U
S
s
u.
u
c
i
UJ
s
u
a
UI I
•c c
3 §
S 3
§52
— • in C
5 5 t
i x =
1 i 3 s
CO
UI
3
5
C
z
UI
u
z
UI
ee
UI
u.
u.
a
A 67
-------
j. "dim
H3I1U
j. "diaL
380Hd
'-dual xoo
U39NUNI
s;
•n
3VA dWHd
C
*£
\
io
?8
to
Si
B!
e
O
C
C
o
v>
o
c
c
I
«^
csi
ii
6a
ex
i
^«
3 P)
u
i
A 68
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
K," l« 6 t
- P ?i 10
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA _5Vi.,i.
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No.3
Sampling Train No.
Run No. g>£
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s):,
Probe recovery person(s):
Sample Box No.
Received By
Date/Time
Date:
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
1st
2nd
3r
±
II.
l&.t
•J*
1-3
Impinger:
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution: MethChlrd
Components Rinsed: ** filter support,
connector U- connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt. (g) -23f.if~
4th
5th
6th
7th 8th-l 8th-2
/J.L
[ Total Condensate Collected (g)
-Before Rinses
*** lth-3th impingers, filter holder back, 45/90°
After Rinses
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution:
JL014
016
/7 LJ
Acetone
-2 017
Acetone
019
IN-STK FILTER
018 / #
Components Rinsed****: probe
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
Acetone
liner, filter holder front
w/Acetone
Filter
Description and Color
COMMENTS:
A 70
-------
FILE NAME - kilnp2
RUN # - kiln2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F )=
Average Delta H ( in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20)-
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min>
Particulate Loading - Front Half
11-30-1994 10:36:48
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g)=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
373.900
416.323
1 .027
0 .001
43.568
41 .763
29.13
-0.12
17.6
2.2
51 .3
5.5
77
0.67
0.072
40O
29.06
28.45
0.2470
99.0
0.82
90.0
0.380
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,054
33,836
20,209
19,104
0.0147
0.0054
0.0031
0.89
Corr. to 7% 02 &
0.0223 0.029:
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )= 0.0148
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0055
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 0.0031
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.89
Percent Impinger Catch= 0.6
0.0224
0.029
A 71
-------
* * ric.,-,_, - . - - *
FILE NAME - kilnp2
RUN # - kiln2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 10.587
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 11.789
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate ( cu m/min)= 0.0000
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 1.234
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 1.183
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 740
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -3
Percent Oxygen= 17.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 51.3
Percent Water= 5.5
Average Meter Temperature ( C )= 25
Average Delta H (mm H20 )= 17.0
Average Delta P ( mm H20 )= 1.8
Average Stack Temperature (C )= 205
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.45
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )= 1.2449
% Isokinetic= 99.0
Pitot Coefficient= 0.82
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 90.0
Nozzle Diameter ( mm )= 9.65
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )= 1.727
Stack Axis »2 ( Meters )= 1.727
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 2.983
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 321
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 958
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 572
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 541
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g )= 0.0147
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. ( mg/cu m )= 12.4
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 7.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.40
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:36=^
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12
51.2 67
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
Percent Impinger Catch=
~" A 72
0.0
12.5
7.1
0.41
0.6
51 .5
-------
r-Au.»i ni-,iyt£ - kilnp2
RUN -# - kiin2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:36:50
Point tt
Delta P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
(in
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
. H20)
010
120
130
040
020
015
155
130
060
040
(in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. H20)
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
.67
(F)
168
446
450
445
442
280
445
442
442
443
In(F)
70
75
78
80
81
79
83
83
84
85
Out(F)
69
70
72
73
74
74
76
77
77
78
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(g)
0 .0000
1 .1O60
Final
(g)
102.6027
83.9241
( mg/ml )=
Wt . Tare Wt
(9)
0.0000
1 .1059
Wt . Tare Wt
(g)
102.5881
83.9240
0.0001
. Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
o.oooo
Vol .
(ml)
85.4 0
198.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0001
Net Wt
(g)
.0146
.0001
A 73
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpt2
RUN # - kiln2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F)=
Average Delta H (in H20 )=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
PROG.^VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:32:36
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min)=
ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min>
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
373.900
416.323
1.027
0.001
43.568
41.763
29.13
-0.12
17.6
2.2
51 .3
5.5
77
0.67
0.072
400
29.06
28.45
0.2470
99.0
0.82
90.0
0.380
68.0
68.0
32.11
1,054
33,836
20,209
19,104
0.0187
0.0069
0.0039
1 .13
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12%
0.0284 0.037
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0188
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0069,
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t )= 0.0039
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 1.13
Percent Impinger Catch= 0.5
0.0285
A 74
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - kilnpt2
RUN # - kiln2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11=33:21
Average Meter Temperature ( C )=
Average Delta H ( mm H2O )=
Average Delta P ( mm H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( C )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( mm H20 ):
% Isokinetic=
10.587
11.789
1.027
0.0000
1.234
1.183
740
«-O
17.6
2.2
51 .3
5.5
25
17.0
1.8
205
29.06
28.45
1 .2449
99.0
Pitot Coef ficient=
Sampling Time ( Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm )=
Stack Axis #1 ( Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)^
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std . ( mg/cu m )=
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
0.82
90.0
9.65
1 .727
1.727
2.983
321
958
572
541
0.0187
15.8
8.9
0.51
Corr. to 72 02 & 12%
65.1 86.2
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
Percent Impinger Catch=
1 A 75
0.0
15.9
9.0
0.51
0.5
65.4
86.6
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpt2
RUN # - kiln2
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 ll:34:l<
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta
P Delta
H Stack T Meter T
(in. H20) (in. H20) (F)
0.010
0.120
0.130
0.040
0.020
0.015
0.155
0.130
0.060
0.040
} Blank
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
Final
(g)
102.5226
1 .1060
Final
(g)
102.6027
83.9241
( mg/ml )=
168
446
450
445
442
280
445
442
442
443
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
102.5186
1 .1O59
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
102.5881
83.9240
0.0001
In(F) Out(F)
70
75
78
80
81
79
83
83
84
85
. Blank Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
85.4
198.0
69
70
72
73
74
74
76
77
77
78
. Net Wt
(g)
0.0040
0.0001
Net Wt
(g)
0.0146
0.0001
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
A 76
-------
UJ
CO
oc
UI
O -J
O H;
< O
5 a-
UJ
o
CO
Al
Z
3
1
X
U
us
K*
O A
r-
04
o
^
^
i
u
UJ
2 ® S
S < 8 o
2 K E J
5^ S jif o
a
o
_j
LU
5
C
'I.
Xi
S '
o
< —
> o
UJ —
^
ui a.
O cc
O
IT
O
UJ
.
8 8 3
S 8
UJ
a
<
in
Al
in
Al
Al
u
UJ
CJ
2
i
1
Al
A]
O
\Tv
Al
4
-o
UJ "4
s I
< <
t •>
2 3
511 = -
3 tu Iff o g
o
z
UJ
=9
u
u.
u
A 77
-------
"dial
H311U
j. '-diai
380IU
d. "diai xoa
JUWVS
4. "dial
U39NUWI
sT
"DVA dNIU
«o
V,
10
OJ
CO
CO ^
.
51
o-
£j^
-
l^.-i-
V
o-
E
.
UJ —
*
,o
3-
s
K
c
c O
o
O
c
o
0
0
o
CO
tv-
Cr
§
o.
c
g
u
n
&
o-V)
c
A 78
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. ^j
Sampling Train No.
Set up person(s) : ^J*.
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
Sample Box No.
Date //- //
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm @
_in.Hg vacuum
Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
PM-10 Preseparator
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.
50 mLs
H2O
100 mLs
H2O
Empty
-200 g indicating
silica gel
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 79
-------
METHOD 201A/202
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No.3
Run No. ^~>
Transfer for Recovery:
Sampling Train No. O I/ "" /
Sample Box No.
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s):.
Probe recovery person(s) :
Received By
Date/Time
Date;
Date;
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger: lst_ 2nd
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th-l
8th-2
Description
and color:
Impingers: »>»»»»» 1-3 <«
Sample Number: ,"3 Qlff *
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g) 3.(e2-g
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g) f?6 7
Rinse Solution: MethChlrd
Components Rinsed: ** filter support,
connector U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g) ,-77^,?
Total Condensate Collected (g)
/r?
Before Rinses
*** lth-3th impingers, filter holder back, 45/90°
After Rinses
YT. L
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number: -3014
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. (g) /7JT.-3
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) t£3^.£>
Rinse Solution Acetone
Sample Number: _i?017
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. (g) J2C3./
Rinse Solution: Acetone
_2015
Acetone
019
016
IN-STK FILTER
018 / #
Components Rinsed****: probe liner, filter holder front
Filter
Description and Color
Sample Bottle Gross Wt . (g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt. (g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt. (g)
Net Sample Wt. (g)
w/Acetone
COMMENTS:
A 80
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpS
RUN # - kilnp3
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P ( in H20 )=
3: Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time ( Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:37:20
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min )=
ft/mi n)=
, Cubic ft/min>
, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
417.076
459.958
1.027
0.001
44.040
41 .926
29.13
-0.12
17.6
2.2
39.4
4.2
81
0.67
0.069
409
29.06
28.59
0.2436
97.4
0.84
90.0
0.380
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,072
34,435
20,356
19,493
0.0047
0.0017
0.0010
0 .29
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12*
0.0071 0.0094
A 81
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - kilnpS
RUN * - kilnp3
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:37:2
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Uater=
Average Meter Temperature (C )=
Average Delta H (mm H20 )=
Average Delta P ( mm H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (C )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (mm )=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Meters )==
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std . ( mg/cu m):
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
11 .810
13.024
1 .027
0.0000
1 .247
1 .187
740
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
17.6
2.2
39.4
4.2
27
17.0
1 .8
210
29.06
28.59
1 .2276
97.4
0.84
90.0
9.65
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
327
975
576
552
0.0047
4.0
2.2
0.13
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12
16.3 21
A 82
-------
FILE NAME - kilnp3
RUN # - kilnpS
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta P Delta H Stack T
Meter T
in. H20)
0.020
0.155
0.100
0.060
0.030
0.010
0.100
0.140
0.055
0.020
(in. H20)
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
(F)
231
448
449
446
446
315
440
442
438
437
In(F)
76
78
82
84
85
83
85
86
86
86
Out(F)
75
75
76
78
79
78
79
80
80
81
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
11-30-1994 10:37:22
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(g)
106.6634
1 .0952
Final
(g)
112.9901
0.0000
( mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
106.6631
1 .0937
Wt . Tare Wt .
(g)
112.9872
0.0000
0.0001
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
0.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0003
0.0015
Net Wt
(g)
.0029
.0000
A 83
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpt3
RUN tt - kilnp3
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 417.076
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 459.958
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)= 0.001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 44.040
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 41.926
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.13
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= . -0.12
Percent Oxygen= 17.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 39.4
Percent Water= 4.2
Average Meter Temperature (F)= 81
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 0.67
Average Delta P (in H20 )= O.069
Average Stack Temperature ( F )= 409
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.59
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )= 0.2436
% Isokinetic= 97.4
Pitot Coefficient^ 0.84
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 90.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )= 0.380
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 68.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 68.0
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 32.11
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 1,072
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 34,435
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 20,356
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 19,493
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0047
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0017
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )= 0.0010
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.29
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0127
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= 0.0047
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= 0.0026
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.78
Percent Impinger Catch= 63.0
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:39:33
Corr. to 7% 02 &
0.0071 0.005
0.0192
0.02?
A 84
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - kilnptS
RUN # - kilnp3
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide^
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:39:34
Average Meter Temperature ( C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight^
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (mm )=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
11 .810
13.024
1 .027
0.0000
1 .247
1 .187
740
-3
17.6
2.2
39.4
4.2
27
17.0
1 .8
210
29.06
28.59
1.2276
97 .4
0.84
90.0
9.65
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
327
975
576
552
0.0047
4.0
2.2
0.13
Corr . to 7% 02 8.
16.3 21.6
Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
Percent Impinger Catch= _„ _
A oo
0.0
10.7
6.1
0.35
63.0
44.0
58.4
-------
FILE NAME - kilnpt3
RUN # - kilnp3
LOCATION - kiln
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT * - 4601.01.05.01
Point #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Delta P Delta H
(in. H20) (in. H20)
Stack T Meter T
(F) In(F) Out(F)
0.020
0.155
0.100
0.060
0.030
0.010
0.100
0.140
0.055
0.020
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
231
448
449
446
446
315
440
442
438
437
76
78
82
84
85
83
85
86
86
86
75
75
76
78
79
78
79
80
80
81
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
12-06-1994 11:39:35
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Final
(9)
106.6634
1.0952
Final
(g)
112.9901
84.1220
(mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt
(g) (g)
106.6631 0.0000
1.0937 0.0000
Wt
Tare
(g)
112.9872
84.1140
0.0001
Wt
Vol
(ml)
0.0
105.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0003
0.0015
Net Wt
(g)
0.0029
0.0080
Impinger Blank (mg/ml )= 0.0000
A 86
-------
A.2.2 Kiln Multiple Metals/PM
A 87
-------
A 88
-------
Al
N
Al
u
UJ
u
•N
z
u
z
i
*
*\
X
Al
VS
Al
Al
N
N
Vis
N
CO
K
Al
31*
! i i
E i i
1 = 3
O A
-------
N^
\
d. "dl«3i
U311U
N
J. "dKQl
380Kd
N
N
M
M
j. "dNii X08
JUWVS
M
N
t-N
N
N
N
•M
Nl
VK
•V)
N
N
U39NUNI
M
M
KN
NN
OH -«i
"3VA dNAd
A
V^
M
TU
x
N/
N)
N.
N
K
Ob
M
s
N
K)
K
K
^
\w
xv
V
X
^
v»
^
Ni
"M
M
N
vcs
N
fvl
ORIHCE PRESSUR
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), In H|0)
x
N
Vv
VI
us
V
Z0^<
saf!
V
Nl
N
N
VE
K
Is
i 3
3 £
N
va
V
N
Vr,
SSl
510
\
X
I
V
vr\
'JO
Ul _
1C trs
i *
VfN
tx
^^>
A 90
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATiS AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, "Ohio
Sampling Location: Kin Stack No. 3
Run No.
Set up person(s): <
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By j_
Sampling Train No.
-
Sample Box No. 0 10
Date //"f-'T3
Sample Box Leak Check:
dm @
jn.Hg vacuum
_,
TRAIN COMPONENT
Received By J- J^^
Date/Time //- J-
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
90° Bypass*"*
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector^
1 st Impinger
(^^^ Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (G)
8th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
/-'.2/Q
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty Loaded
_ Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.: vJ
Empty
1 00 mLs _+. 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H2 O2
1 00 mLs +_ 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H
Empty
.^77,0
2O2
100 mLs ± 2 mLs****
4% KMn04/10% H2 SO4
100 mLs ±2 mLs****
4% KMn04/10% H2SO4
100 mLs*****
1.0 N NaOH
-200 g indicating
silica gel
<—Exchange when necessary
Note: Components in italics used only when mercury is a target metal.
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and after sampling. Probe
liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok
cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil after sampling.
*** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange
component openings covered with parafilm or Teflon tape.
**** Use 200 mLs _+. 2 mLs and document below if reagent is exhausted before the end of a previous run.
Prepare additional reagent blanks accordingly.
***** Used for acid trap and is not recovered as a sample. Replace with acidic KMnO4 if the acidic KMnO4 in the
previous impinger is exhausted before the end of a previous run, and prepare additional reagent blanks
accordingly.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATES AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, "Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack, No. 3
Run No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By:
Sample box recovery oerson(s):
Probe recovery person(s): /ft.
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No.
Date/Time //-f-f
Date: H-/U-73
Date:
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger:
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
Description
and color:
Impingers: » » > >
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g
Rinse Solution:
Components Rinsed:
2nd
4th
5th
6th
8th-
.? ^T73,l
,Q
Ld.
M-
.0
/».
[ Total Condensate Collected (g):
1-3 <««
y 031 *
V?F.
/032
'> » > 5-6 « «
/ 033 *» » / 034
-Before Rinses
0.1NHN03 0.1NHNO3
** filter support, ** 4th
acidic KMnO4 8 N HCI
*** 5th-6th impingers.
filter holder back, 45/90° connector
or short 90° connector, 1 st-3rd
impingers, U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g) t3 73.
impinger U-connectors D-F
r-t.~rs<~ er*
After Rinses
. L
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
/ 065
1 029
030
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Rinse Solution: Acetone 0.1 N HNO3
Components Rinsed****: nozzle, probe liner, cyclone and flask or bypass, filter holder front
Filter
Description and Color:
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
w/Acetone
, t. v
// f.o
A-&3- Y
Do not fill bottle; vent pressure after recovery (before and after shipment). Keep samples iced to minimize
pressure buildup.
Using 100 mLs 0.1 N HNO3, rinse components (2X).
Check pH with a glass rod and pH indicator strips; adjust with cone. HNO3 .
Using a total of 150 mLs (250 mLs if cyclone and flask are used) acetone, rinse components (3X or more
with brushing) until clean. If some residue cannot be removed, rinse components again with a total of 100
mLs (200 mLs if cyclone and flask are used) ASTM Type I water (3X or more with brushing). Combine
water and acetone rinses. Then, using a total of 100 mLs (200 mLs if cyclone and flask are used) 0.1 N
HNO3, rinse components (3X or more with brushing); combine these rinses and keep separate. Follow witl
water, then acetone rinses and discard those rinses.
COMMENTS:
A 92
-------
^ S 2 Z
m
LU
o
§
o
o
m
DC
Q
<
LU
o
co
CO
I 3 5 5 5
§ZC jC rr» 3! 3C
O O gj O O
LU
*\
.
O
o
Si
3:0
CO
LU
o
I
CO
o
i & o= § &
O m a. O m a.
CO
CM
LU
lCD
93
co
i- CVI CO
CVJ CO
CXJ
0
O
i
i
o- o o
—c^i «o
•r- CM CO
\0
d° 60 i»
t> o^ <>~
i- CM CO
Z_ ^5"
T- cy co"
w i i
co 3 §
i— CO <
*1 =
O DC
CD CD
E E
CO
LO to
a> CM
s °
CD
O
I
CD CD CD
S ii
o"o
JQ J3
CO C\J
A V\
CM
O
O
CD
E
o
O
A 93
-------
rxi_c lNAl'*lc. ~ flicCajLSi
RUN # - MM5KILN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 944.772
Final Meter Volume (Cubic.Feet )= 1044.190
Meter Factor= 1.027
Multiple'leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 102.102
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 99.211
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.30
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.12
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-04-1994 15:05:13
Leak Correction^ 0.000(
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Uater=
Average Meter Temperature (F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (F)=
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Average Square
% Isokinetic^
Weight=
Weight=
Root of Delta P (in H.20 ) =
17.6
2.2
96.0
4.4
74
1 .22
0.081
429
29.06
28 .57
0.2613
92.7
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet ) =
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)-
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weigh't (g)=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Load Trig', Actual (gr/cu f t )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.84
175.0
O.417
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,160
37,260
21 ,657
20,713
0.0537
0.0083
0.0046
1 .48
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% C
0.0343 0.0455
A 94
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - metalsl
RUN # - MM5KILN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Met Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen-
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml ) =
Percent Water-=
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H ( rnm H20 )=
P (mm H20)=
Temperature
Uleight =
Weight^
(c
(C
)-
)=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic^
26.752
29.567
1 .027
2.891
2.809
744
-3
17.6
2.2
96 .0
4 .4
23
30.9
2.0
221
29.06
28 .57
1.3168
92.7
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-04-1994 15:05:15
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (mm ) =
Stack Axis ttl (Meters ) =
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min )=
m/mi n ) =
, Cubic m/min)-
, Cubic m/min)-
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight ( g)=
Loading, Dry Std . ( mg/cu m )=
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.84
175.0
10.59
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
354
1 ,055
613
587
0.0537
19.1
10.6
0.67
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% C<
78.7 104.3
A 95
-------
FILE NAME - metalsl
RUN # - MM5KILN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT * - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-04-1994 15:05:15
Point tt
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.160
0.130
0.100
0.065
0.035
0.130
0.120
0.110
0.020
0.001
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.075
0.140
0.030
0.020
0.125
0.170
0.220
0.020
0.020
0.055
0.115
0.085
Delta H
(in. H20)
2 .40
1 .96
1 .52
1 .00
0.53
1 .98
1 .82
1 .70
0 .30
0 .01
0.30
0.30
0 .45
1 .13
2 .10
0 .46
0.30
1 .90
2 .60
3.30
0 .30
0 .30
0 .80
1 .70
1 .30
Stack
(F)
433
432
431
429
427
431
434
434
431
429
422
422
432
437
438
406
422
437
442
442
408
408
433
437
436
T
In(F
71
70
77
78
79
74
76
81
83
79
72
73
73
75
77
72
72
72
76
80
74
74
74
75
77
Meter T
) Out(F)
70
70
71
71
72
73
73
74
75
75
71
72
72
74
72
71
70
70
72
72
71
71
71
70
70
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .0939
Wt . Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
1 .0830
Blank Wt .
(g)
0 .0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0109
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed beloi
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0010 70.0000
0.0050 105.0000
Final Wt . Tare Wt
(g) (g)
92.5844 92.5408
0.0000 0.0000
mg/ml )= 0.0037
Vol .
(ml)
214.5
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0428
0.0000
A 96
-------
lex
Ul
Q
Q
_J
UJ
u.
x/\
I
N
CO
2
O
ui
Si D
i 1
CJO
o
X
o 2
Ul Ul
i §
Q. O.
M
O
UJ
© g
< 8 d S
ir ir
u, ju
Ul
IT
2 3
I
O 2
O
O cc
5 -
S i u,
oJ Q; §
o
IS
Al
in
x
o
Vis
£
Al
O
o
ta
UJ
|
A 97
-------
"dlOl
Harm
Nl
M
M
N
M
N
r
Ni
:
>
iS
"dlUBl
aaoud
•x
M
N
.M
N
Ni
NJ
"N,
M
'N
xoa
jywvs
M)
Ni
N
N
N
N
M
M
V,
'V
3VA JOHM
N
vs
va
K
N.
N
K
N
K
K <>v)
~
v\
N
N
to
NJ
60
fTs
V)
M
PRESSURE
RENTIAL
, In H,0)
ORIFI
DIF
(A
N
fc
x^
N
N
N
CN
IN
X
X
X
V.
SZ%*
g = 2s
\i\
N
X
N
X
5
5
a
N.
£
tr>
g
N
M
N
Nl
X
-^
x
•N
tCN
S
eft
Vi
VJ
A 98
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATES AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
_ FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA _ __
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kin Stack No. 3
Sampling Train No. /n/y\ - J2 Sample Box No. Q IIL O O j __
Run No.
Set up person(s): .7
Transfer to Sampler: /
Relinquished By
Date /l-f
Sample Box Leak Check:
_cfm @
in.Hg vacuum
Received By J -
Date/Time //-
TRAIN COMPONENT
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
Cyclone**
Flask**
90° Bypass**
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
45/90° Connector**
Short 90° Connector**
1st Impinger
(2-L** Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (G)
8th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Replacement 8th Impinger**
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty
Loaded
_ Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No
2 02
^y /
Empty
100 mLs _+. 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H
100 mLs +_ 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H2 02
Empty
100 mLs jt 2 mLs****
4% KMnO4/10% H2 SO4
100 mLs jt 2 mLs****
4% KMn04/10% H2SO4
100 mLs*****
1.0 N NaOH
r -200 g indicating
silica gel
<-Exchange when necessary
. 3
. 7
**
***
Note: Components in italics used only when mercury is a target metal.
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and after sampling. Probe
liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok
cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil after sampling.
Optional for low/high particulate/moisture gas streams as applicable.
Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange
component openings covered with parafilm or Teflon tape.
Use 200 mLs ±_ 2 mLs and document below if reagent is exhausted before the end of a previous run.
Prepare additional reagent blanks accordingly.
Used for acid trap and is not recovered as a sample. Replace with acidic KMn04 if the acidic KMnO4 in the
previous impinger is exhausted before the end of a previous run, and prepare additional reagent blanks
accordingly.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATES AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack, No. 3
Run No. >>>>> 1-3 «
Sample Number: r3.031
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g) •*/?/•.
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(q 7?(T-
3rd 4th
^T7.T". O #7 /-f
/7-V ^-f
[
<« 4
,2032
M nss
L nt.o
5th 6th 7th 8th- 1 JJth-2" — "
7 S73 -~7 vST/.? •VfO'l 77//V
£~(*~l-¥ S~7?-3~ 76UTY ~7V3.^
' y.^ j.~i rv.7") j-> f
Total Condensate Collected (q): /pto. o \
~ L ~ / J— 'tr
>/>>"> 5& ^« < 5-6 *^ % Blue
_? 033 *»» .2034
2C>/^' 171.3
-------
22 Z Z
to ^ ^ ..22
co •* "* co •*• «*•
>] 2 2 CO 2 2
< 2 2 ^ Z 2
cc :c i Q- oc :n
O o o Lti o o
LL.
UJ
CO
gl
0 \
^
j
0
/
tz
^f
*(
go
o [
Z
I
1
O
o
t
h- h- t t I" f~ t
^T ^ 11 1 1— ^ UJ "~
CO a: ID ^ cc ;§ CL
Q O CD Q. O CD DL
"*"" T^
CO ^ V
_CD CM
O
CD
S
•+9
°" Q5
5 II
_f^ j^
*^J5 ^^O
O^* 0s"
CO CM
A V\
CM
o
o
CD
O
A 101
-------
FlLt. NAME - metals2
RUN » - mm5kl2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic -Feet)=
Meter Factor^
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
49.800
177 .838
1 .027
131 .495
126.906
PROG.=V£R 00/27/89
03-04-1994 16:00:03
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Barometric Pressure (in Hg ) =
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
29.30
-0.12
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F )=
Average Delta H (in H20 )=
Average Delta P (in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Root of Delta P ( in H20 )=
Pitot Coefficient^
'Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )= •
Stack Axis 81 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= '
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/mi n)
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/mi n)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ,(g)=
Particulate Loading-,; Dry Std . (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t )=
Emission Rate ( Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
18.4
1 .0
120.0
4.3
78
1.71
0.106
429
28.90
28.43
0.3201
99.3
0.82
175.0
0.417
68.0
68.0
32.11
1,385
44,462
25,840
24,738
0.0430
0.0052
0.0029
1.11
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CO
0.0281 0.0627
A 102
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - metals2
RUN » - mm5kl2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 1.410
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 5.036
Meter Factor= 1 .027
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 3.723
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 3.593
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 744
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -3
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-04-1994 16:00:04
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Percent Oxygen= 18.4
Percent Carbon Dioxide^ 1.0
Moisture Collected (ml)= 120.0
Percent Water= 4.3
Average Meter Temperature (C )- 25
Average Delta H (mm H20 )= 43.4
Average Delta P (mm H20 )= 2.7
Average Stack Temperature (C )= 221
Dry Molecular Uleight= 28.90
Wet Molecular Weight^ 28.43
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )= 1.6131
% Isokinet'ic = 99.3
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)-
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate
Loading -
'•*&£. ••
Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )-
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.82
175,0
10.59
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
422
1 ,259
732
700
0.0430
12.0
6.7
0.50
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CO.
64.5 143.7
A 103
-------
FILE NAME - metals2
RUN tt - mm5kl2
L6CATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT 8 - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-04-1994 16:00:05
Point tt
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n. H20)
.115
.135
.100
.060
.040
.125
.125
. 100
.040
.015
.150
.150
.150
.140
.135
.115
.115
.115
.115
.115
.105
.100
.100
.100
.100
-Delta H
(in
1
2
1
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. H20)
.80
.10
.60
.95
.63
.00
.00
.50
.64
.24
.50
.50
.50
.30
.20
.00
.80
.80
.80
.80
.70
.60
.60
.60
.60
Stack
(F)
433
430
428
430
431
432
432
436
431
431
409
421
431
431
432
414
423
431
436
439
425
420
434
438
438
T , Meter T
In(F)
68
71
76
78
79
75
79
75
84
83
75
79
83
86
87
78
79
82
84
86
81
84
86
88
88
Out(F)
67
68
71
71
71
73
74
71
75
76
74
74
75
76
77
77
76
77
77
78
80
80
80
80
80
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .1205
Ult. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
1 .1103
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Net Ult
(g)
0.0000
0.0102
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction Final
(g)
PROBE RINSE 103.7065
IMPINGERS ^: 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank*-(mg/ml )=
Impinger Blank (mjp^ml )= 0
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0010 70.0000
0.0010 105.0000
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
103.6735
0.0000
0.0007
0000
Vol .
(ml)
244.0
0.0
0
0
Net Wt
(g)
.0328
.0000
A 104
-------
a
a
UJ
/
i
\
\
K
$
NOZZLE OIA
)
1
1
|
V
I
\1
i
(D
S?
Q.
n
*
|
s
x
/
X
V
\^
~f
JlSTURE '
ASSUMED MC
\
*
UJ
^ AND TYP
t-
u.
CO
O
rr
0.
^
^
\
N
^
n
z
u
^
^^
\
*
*\\
<
METER AH (8
^
X
8
UJ
a.
2
co
A.-
.v;
N
S
\4
>
X.
\i
^
H
K
N
^
<
ECTION
METER CORP
N
i
^
2
X
UJ
tu
2
^
\
x
1
X
\SJ
\
^
o
M
X
1
\
*
)LLERNO.
=
g
O
ft.
UJ
H-
^
x^
Z
?
i
n
"^s
M
\
^
V
Z
U.
PITOTCOEFF
M
X
*
O
cc
u
a.
UJ
p
V
S
\
I
V,
s
2:
^
N
/
^S
V
N
UJ
tr
PRESSU
BAROMETRIC
N
J
M)
i
c
u.
0.
C
s
T
"
V
)
fl
CC
C
4
\
N
y
/
/
—
z
—
2
UJ
SITE TO BARC
M
\
^
\
^
i
d
a
o
<
3
I
vo
\
i
cc
(0
ac
UJ
1
UL
o
p
<
S
UJ
o
M
.
- \
0
^
,s
2 uj
co a.
CORRECTED
STATIC PRES
Hi
Vf^
v^
£1
\
^
O ^**
O
t i
3 fs
i c
3 Z
V
• -b
I N
\
N a
U
K =
|1
S 3
Q t.
S f
h-
3 .
>
<
I-
Z
5
a.
sc*
Al
u
UJ
u
^E
uj
0
s:
'
_J
c
<
z
^
u.
_J
_J
C
<
t:
^"
5b
—
\t
^
r-
CM
Ul
2
^
^
Ik
"S.
CO
2
Z
Al
x
a:
u
*i
tti
s
<
u.
<
z
^
U.
3
ut
«
X
-
£•
CM
UJ
P
U.
2.
UJ
X
1
i
UJ
a.
w
^
z
_,
^
z
•
<
u.
_J
z
Vt>
O
V)
^~
_^
£
CM
UJ
f^
5>
Al
ir>
Al
V
in
Al
X
Z
o
^^
^
"
D
'0
•
u.
VOLUMES
i
u.
z
UJ
u
UJ
••
5
09
U
Ul
X
o
2
g
^^
UJ
a.
09
i
U.
_J
—
UL
J
—
Z
<
U.
UJ
_
IO
Al
2
in
Al
a
X
u
u.
u
r
C
V
?
r
VOLUMES
i
b
r\
r\
•v
UJ
y
i
—
z
«
1
V
t
<
1
(
(
c
c
L
JS
^
^
N
X)
\>
UJ
=3
0
<
ul
<
z
^
ftl
*^
I
\
UJ
_l
y
u
u
=
UJ
u
z
UJ
u.
u.
a
K
"
r
«
i'
i
i
O il
A 105
-------
M*
o z
X t-
£|
-I
«9 E
I
d.".
U311U
d. 'VHGl
380W
xoa
JUMVS
d. "dWHl
U39NUWI
'OtfA dNHd
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
1-
£ Jc .
Ill Ul -i
ill
o
ffi-jN
c >•
"
ED
NJ
N
V
VA
NfN
NJ
-N)
N
NS
K
X.
e?
M
N
K
K
Vis
5s
V/N
M
M
M
K
fN
to
M
N
v
NJ
tfe
^
Nl
VA
VA
to
JO
N
N
Vrs
.
N
rM
\/NVjN
SIN
N
fc
•NJ
•NI
VN
to
'N
•N
to
toto
\/N
b
\I\
M
rs
M
to
MN
K
N)
N
K
•50
K
VT,
M
S
N
xs ^
ID
fcs
•s
v^
CJ
J\
N
K
K
n,
\ n
N
A 106
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATES AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, "Ohio
Sampling Location: Kin Stack No. 3
Run No. 3
Set up person(s): ~J .
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No. 61 1 ?*?
Date
X/-/o-yJ
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By _
_cfm @
Date/Time
Jn.Hg vacuum
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
LOADING DATA
90° Bypass***
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector""
1st Impinger
(3-*?** Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (G)
8th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty Loaded
*_ Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.:
Empty
100 mLs _+. 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H2 02
100 mLs _+. 2 mLs
5% HN03/10% H2 02
Empty
100 mLs ± 2 mLs**** Vs5l7
4% KMn04/10% H2S04
100 mLs ±_ 2 mLs****
4% KMn04/10% H2S04
100 mLs*****
1.0 N NaOH
~200 g indicating
silica gel
<--Exchange when necessary
Note: Components in italics used only when mercury is a target metal.
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and after sampling. Probe
liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok
cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil after sampling.
'I'i
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/29 - PARTICULATES AND MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN (MM5PM)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, "Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack, No. 3
Run No. O*
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By:
Sample box recovery person(s):.
Probe recovery person(s):
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No. oil f? L
Received By
Date/Time
Date:
Date:
/l-/0~?3 3o3 o
/-// -
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger:
Final Wt.(g)
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
Description
and color:
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
r {.zt't sm.3
5th 6th 7th
S7SS 6/A2
8th- 1
«th 2
-
II.?
(0
ti
[ Total Condensate Collected (g): / a,r. f ]
Impingers: » » » 1-3 <««
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g
Rinse Solution:
Components Rinsed:
?031
J5032
5-6
% Blue
.3033
»»
-3034
J*
-Before Rinses-
0.1NHN03 0.1NHN03 acidic KMn04 8 N HCI
** filter support, ** 4th *** 5th-6th impingers,
filter holder back, 45/90° connector impinger U-connectors D-F
or short 90° connector, 1st-3rd
impingers, U-connectors A-C fQS.&
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g) tt&'ft ZT)O<~) kf3>& 3?6-(a After Rinses
Net Sample Wt.(g) "frof',1
-------
Z Z Z Z
co 2 2 ..22
co •* •* co •««••<*•
>j Z Z 55 Z Z
< LU LU ^j LU uj
z cn o < o o
"*~ *y 3Z ^ ZZ Z
LU < < < < <
tr -T re n- *r* -^
O <-> O uj O O
u.
LU
CD
O
S M
cr.
1
o
1 LU u
i tf.
L- 2 t= ^ ^ t ^
% $ £ & $ £ &
rr tr zj 9= tr o 9b
Q O CD Q- O CD CL
CQ
LU
Q
0 «s
O >
0 >
CO ?^
tr >
S
Q
*N
^
^
z
ZZ LL
,,
^v
V
— „ l*J
"-• § t
^J tt O
>-
X
O
"^
v§
^^
rH
^*
"^"^
^1
,
•^
t^N
-^-
^
^
*w
^
^f
z SZ" ^.
B B §
8< 0 o
J» -
Z Q 2 f~ >• QC
•_ Z ^ CO r— O
O LU co 55 LU H;
^ a! g i E £
§ I 3 | i g
LU
^J
"*
CO
CM
LU
si
ojS
01
LU
Z
ACTUAL
READING
z
II
ejuj
J
z /
DC /
/ W
/
t^
^
~ •
^
v
O * •
i- e*i m
*&) •
*
****
5^
i- CJ tr>
^
r^ t-«i
* * •*
~— «» ~».
•r- cv m
CJ
O
S&
^C
2
9-V •*
TJQ tr> V
i- CJ CO
t<
'
V CQ v»
T- CJ CO
^
K
"**•
vSNVx
y^ ^T\ ^^
^ •». -^-
T- CJ CO
5J
2%
§ i o
eo 2 =
LU Z UJ
Z, Q CZ
c5 tr o
5
§
i
2
*
4B
5
fh *T\
\jj QJ
||
^^
«^
LO Lf)
CO ^ V
^ CM
O
CD
O
s
Q.
CD CD CD
•<^ — -'
>>
JO J3
S^ S^
CO CJ
S53S
^^ ^tJ"
A V\
CVJ
v>*
O
o
CD
O
A 109
-------
FILE NAME - metalsS
RUN #"- mmSklS
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT 8 - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic"Feet )=
Meter Factor^
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )-
Barometric Pressure (in Hg ) =
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
179.500
282.327
1 .027
0.008
105.603
101 .263
29.30
-0.12
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08:33:21
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide^
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H ( in H20 ) =
P ( in H20)=
Temperature
Weight^
Weight^
(F)=
(F) =
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches ) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
WeighMfl)=
Loading, Dry Std . (gr/scf )=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
17.8
1 .7
105 .1
4.7
81
1 .21
0.076
435
28.99
28.48
0.2567
99.5
0.82
175 .0
0.417
68 .0
68.0
32.11
1 ,113
35,729
20,645
19,683
0.0886
0.0135
0.0074
2.27
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CC
0.0590 0.0935
A
11
0
-------
* * METRIC UNITS *
FILE NAME - metals3
RUN # - mm5kl3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Metor Factor^
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min )=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide^
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average
Average
Average
Average
Meter Temperature ( C) =
Delta H (mm H20)=
Delta P (mm H20)=
Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight-
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )-
% Isokinetic=
5.083
7 .994
1 .027
0 .0002
2 .990
2.867
744
-3
17.8
1 .7
105,1
4 .7
27
30 .7
1 .9
224
28.99
28.48
1 .2935
99.5
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08:33:22
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters ) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min )=
m/min )=
Cubic m/min )=
Cubic m/mi n )-
Particulate Loadirig - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )-
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.82
175.0
10.59
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
339
1 ,012
585
557
0.0886
30.9
17 .0
1 .03
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CO;
135.2 214.3
A 111
-------
RILE NAME - metalS3
RUN # - mm5kl3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08=33:23
oint tt
1
2
o
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n. H20)
.010
.035
.040
.150
.125
.010
.015
.040
.080
.130
.025
.070
.100
.140
.070
.140
.130
.105
.070
.030
.155
.120
.070
.030
.005
"Delta H
(in
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
. H20 )
.16
.60
.60
.40
.00
.16
.24
.65
.28
.10
.40
.10
.60
.20
.10
.20
.10
.70
.12
.48
.50
.90
.10
.48
.08
Stack
(F)
403
421
434
438
437
425
427
416
435
440
426
442
444
444
444
444
443
441
438
438
439
432
443
438
432
T Meter T
In(F)
75
75
76
78
83
80
82
82
84
84
80
81
84
86
88
80
84
86
87
87
82
85
87
87
85
Out(F)
75
74
74
75
76
77
78
78
78
81
80
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Impinger Blank (m€)T/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .1285
Final
(g)
99.3346
0.0000
mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
1 .1002
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
99.2743
0.0000
0.0007
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol .
(ml)
0.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0283
Net Wt
(g)
.0603
.0000
A 112
-------
A.2.3 Kiln Semivolatile Organic Compounds
A 113
-------
A 114
-------
— —
5 Q 5 §
a 3 22
VJ
= s
>
?1
8
£
£ ?
UJ « b O-
2 O uj Q
< t O »—
O
O
_l
UJ
u.
O
c-
\^
i
§o o
z z
Q Q Q
n
1
I
a:
t g g
UJ I- Z
tx.
OC J <
a. Q. o
c c
S uj
s %
2
2
u
u
c,
o|
C7
a
Al
I
I
AS
no
s
Al
Al
Cb
oc
t—
UJ
£ 1 2 3
\s
tf
A 115
-------
!x v it
o
1
d. "dHOl
H311U
d. "dMBl
si. "dnai xoa
TUWVS
j. "
U39NUNI
"3VA dNfld
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH). In HtO)
u) «
£*
-
VTi
ol
V
n>i
SQ
s^
SiS
IT
V
tr
WVSQQ
N
S
r?
p^J1 ^
r- j* CN
fc u if.
•v ;? 5*
u/
ff
60
f^
Q
^^^
VT
tr\
^>
oc
§
tS
\
N
^
0-
r-
^
tc
"0
r-
'"N
rv
VN
OD
M
0
0
\r
s
8?
Y-
^
^>
M
S,R
co
N)
1C
TV
^
W
^V
v
V
A 116
-------
j. "dVOJ.
H311H
do "dW3i
380U
VXl
d. "dWli X08
JUWVS
a
N
tvj
U39NUWI
(N
"OVA dNU
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No.
Client/Source:
Source Location:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Belden Brick Company
Sugar Creek, Ohio
Kiln Stack No.3
Run No.
J
Sampling Train No. . S L/ — / Sample Box No. O 11
Set up person(s): ~> /vf c ^
TRAIN COMPONENT COMPONENT NO.
Sample Box Leak Check: cfrn @ in.Hg vacuum
deceived By J. S~—^_^ Date/Time //- ^-^J
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass4**
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
n~~ *
Condenser
Thermowell U St
ator
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge
U-Connector (A)
1st Impinger (c&*&+za
&1** Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (C)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (D)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
^•5th<
/ *Mta
1 fcjtrr Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Thermocouple No.:
-65 grams XAD-2 Resin
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
-200 g indicating silica gel
Note: Components in italics used only with MRI-style organic module. Do not use for PAHs.
* Nozzle openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with
Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with
hexane-rinsed aluminum foil before and after sampling.
*** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange
component openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil.
**** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during
storage and sampling.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 118
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio -
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. /
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No. Dl I
Received By -J .
Date/Time 11-9- 7 J 39Oo
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe recovery oerson(s): //?/l^»
Impinger: XAD Cartridge
Final Wt.(a) *j PL . / ^
Initial Wt.(a) ^/Pf, / ^
NetWt.(a) J-A
Description ,.>—
and color: Jv^'/ ^•""^ ^
~J./n^£^ ~J1 S~^~ Date //-f-73
-^ LoLjt-^.^— Date //-?-fj
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
1st 2nd , 3rd 4th 5th ^-etfT
ry^*2-" gfrd-v &7&V W-v 75"?y?
-/Lib ~? 5~^7.^5'
S ^ -? s> ^ **
Impingers: XAD Cartridge »>»»» 1-4 <«««««
% Blue
Sample Number: I 039
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Components Rinsed**: 1st-4th impingers, U-connectors A-E
1 After Rinses
040 <--Recovery of 2nd-4th Impingers and
U-connectors C-E Optional
Before Rinses
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER
Sample Number:
/037
Description and Color:
/ 036/038/fr-
TRAIN RINSES Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Components Rinsed***: nozzle, probe liner, cyclone/flask or bypass, filter holder, short 90° connector.
condenser, thermowell U-connector
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
Pour any residual condensate from condenser into cartridge inlet, replace blank-offs and remove aluminum
foil, then weigh; replace aluminum foil to cover entire cartridge.
Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses (3X).
Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing (with 5 minute soaks of underlined
components) 3X or more until clean.
COMMENTS:
-------
FILE NAME - semvl
RUN # - M5SVKL1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:12:38
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 460.067
Final Meter Volume (Cubic "Feet )= 563.962
Meter Factor= 1.021
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 106.077
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) = 102.084
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= 29.30
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.12
Percent Oxygen^ 17.8
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 97.0
Percent Water= 4.3
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H ( in H20)=
P ( in H20)=
Temperature
Weight=
Weight=
(F
(F
) =
)=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #1 (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)^
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet ) =
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading,- Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weighti,;(g)=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
79
1 .38
0.082
433
29 .06
28.59
0.2608
94 .8
0 .84
175.0
0 .419
68 .0
68 .0
32.11
1 ,160
37,260
21,559
20,635
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0 .00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CC
0.0000 0.0000
A
120
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - semvl
RUN # - M5SVKL1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT ft - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 13.027
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 15.969
Meter Factor= 1.021
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 3.004
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 2.891
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 744
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -3
Percent Oxygen^
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water-
Average Meter Temperature ( C) =
Average Delta H (mrn H20 ) =
Average Delta P ( mm H20) =
Average Stack Temperature ( C) =
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Weight=
Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )-
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (mm ) =
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std . ( mg/cu m )-
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
17 .8
2 .2
97 .0
4 .3
26
35.0
2 .1
223
29.06
28.59
1 .3142
94 .8
0.84
175.0
10.64
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
354
1 ,055
610
584
0.0000
0 .0
0.0
0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:12:39
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12°^ CO
0.0 0.0
A 121
-------
FILE NAME --semvl
RUN n - M5SVKL1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT 8 - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:12:40
Point tt
1
*_
3
4
5
6
~7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(i
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n. H20)
.005
.015
.025
.085
.165
.005
.025
.070
.160
.145
.020
.070
.115
.175
.070
.145
.120
.055
.025
.005
.145
.150
.165
.060
.025
"De
(in
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
2
0
1
2
3
1
->
c_
2
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
0
Ita H
. H20)
.08
.21
.40
.40
.80
.08
.41
.20
.73
.50
.34
.20
.00
.00
.20
.50
.00
.85
.42
.08
.50
.40
.70
.00
.40
Stack T Meter T
(F)
425
422
426
428
430
425
422
429
432
437
424
429
436
438
439
437
439
441
441
438
438
439
441
440
438
In(F)
72
74
73
75
78
78
79
80
82
85
78
77
79
82
85
79
81
82
82
82
81
82
83
85
84
Out(F )
71
73
73
74
75
77
78
79
79
80
77
77
78
78
82
79
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
Fraction Final
(g)
DRY CATCH 0.0000
FILTER 0.0000
Fraction Final
(g)
PROBE RINSE 0.0000
IMPINGERS 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank. ( mg/ml )=
Impinger Blank ( mg/ml )= 0
Wt . Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
.0000
. Blank Wt . Net Wt .
(g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
Vol . Net Wt .
(ml) (g)
0.0 0.0000
0.0 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0100 35.0000
0.0060 35.0000
0.0050 105.0000
A 122
-------
o
a
UJ
u.
Ui ^0 X
vx s/ s.-»
^"^ " — \
a
z
V
I
51
u.
N
^^
C
PROJECT NO •&,&/ PROBE LENOTH AND TYPF A tf~ X*>/3 5 ASSUMED MOISTI IRP K / fi /*
^.
«
2
CC
u
6
V
>
FILTER NO UMBILICAL CORD ID NO N'/K'^C SITE TO BAHO El FVATION
2
i
c
a
a
c
u
>•
\
I
C
C
i
c
«
&
(
«
1
^
\
u
4
1-
4
c
j
i
UUa.ttAl'RAUP.irf. HOOKUP ^/,V~^3I NO77, E NO S/- / STATpn PRFSS1IRP -0. /Z- SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE
-
D
<
-
5
a.
AJ
o
Ul
X
u
H-
k
i
z
z
S
z
_J
u.
g
Z
o
o
Cr
O
Ul
1
||
Al
i
o
— J
1
PASS/FAIL
2jy|
_J
z
E
«i
z
z
^
u.
§
/
J?
Ul
Z
PASS/FAIL
\ 1
CO
1
u
z
i
CO
23
*—
z
g
ul
E
z
\
S
z
1
V
N
-^^.
o-
O
\T
CM
UJ
to
'Al
i
in
Al
Al
z
a
u
i
^
§
*
u.
u
Ul
o
r\
M
rv
&
s
Ul
I
2
—
1
FINAL WnillMF &&&. g*J-&>
N
Ul
_J
o
K:
u
UJ
u
i
Z
Ul
u
z
Ul
CC
Ul
u.
u.
a
•
K
\D
Ul
=
_J
a
•>
«
u
e
u.
K-
cr
d
-------
J. "dlGi
H311H
M
M
V
A
NJ
M
M
V
d. "
380W
t
I
(0
CvJ
fN
M
r\
N
NJ
d. "dUQi X08
ruwvs
t\)
N
N
-N
(NJ
fM
N
N
N
K?
fs)
M
d. "dWlL
U39NUNI
,0
V
xs
V
If
V
R
OH •«)
"3VA dNfU
V,
v/\
03
(M
N
^
r-
V
CC
Oo
o
£j£
Vi
&
r-
r-
tf
£§
NT
*«
vO
Ss
0
ri
V
N
^
(M
tsl
V
w
Cs fco
C
Vl
CM
>s
hn
m —E
8
VI
V
Q
-C
^
r-
•N
0
frt
s
^
>9|SS
o
Ci
V
xS
xi
g§
0
SP
at
a
X-
HI
N
^
(V
>«
<>
M
I
Vn
Ui
A 124
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No.3
Run No.
Set up person(s):_
Transfer to Sampler:/7 Sample Box Leak Check: cfm @ in.Hg vacuum
Relinquished By Received By Date/Time
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
Cyclone**
Flask**
90° Bypass**
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
Condenser
Thermowell U-Connector
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge
U-Connector (A)
1st Impinger
(2-L** Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (C)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (D)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)**
U-Connector (F)**
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A #3
Thermocouple No.:
— 65 grams XAD-2 Resin
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
-200 g indicating silica gel
-200 g indicating silica gel
S73J
Note: Components in italics used only with MRI-style organic module. Do not use for PAHs.
* Nozzle openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with
Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet'covered (not sealed) with
hexane-rinsed aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Optional for low/high particulate/moisture gas streams as applicable.
*** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange
component openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil.
**** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during
storage and sampling.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 125
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. aL
Transfer for Recovery:
Sampling Train No. -S\J~
Sample Box No.
Date/Time //-A3-V3
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe recovery oerson(s):
Impinger: XAD Cartridge
Final Wt.(q) V7T- Y
Initial Wt.(a) *J73> -2.
Net Wt.la) 3-.Z-
Description
and color: ( ijl^',4-*^
T s*^
RESIN
1st
£~L 7. J"
773.0
-7V ?
^
C^ — - Date //-xe-y_
Date
CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
2nd 3rd 4th 5th
^^ / f - \0 ^_5 Qi f V f re ' '—' f^~ '- '
-£73 .1 vjT/ 3 .3 -Viol-*? ~7or^~
/.3~ Qi..^\ /. y J?.(*
[xTotal Condensate Collected (q): c
1-4 <«««««
Sample Number: 0^039
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
o2.040 <--Recovery of 2nd-4th Impingers and
^ f?-? U-connectors C-E Optional
Before Rinses
Components Rinsed**: 1st-4th impingers, U-connectors A-E
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
After Rinses
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER
Sample Number: o2. 037
Description and Color:
TRAIN RINSES Sample Number: ^036/038
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g) /7V.£ /7-?. 7
Components Rinsed***: nozzle, probe liner, cyclone/flask or bypass, filter holder, short 90° connector.
condenser, thermowell U-connector
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
Pour any residual condensate from condenser into cartridge inlet, replace blank-offs and remove aluminum
foil, then weigh; replace aluminum foil to cover entire cartridge.
Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses (3X).
Methanol/methylene chloride (1:1 v/v) rinses with brushing (with 5 minute soaks of underlined
components) 3X or more until clean.
COMMENTS:
f
»/'<-)«^—
\J
-------
NAME - semiv2
RUN # - m5svkn2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 565.230
Final Meter Volume (Cubic "Feet ) = 667.834
Meter Factor= 1.021
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Met Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 104.759
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) = 100.421
Barometric Pressure (in Hg ) = 29.30
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.12
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:20:31
Leak Correction- 0.0000
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected ( ml)=
Percent Water=
18.8
1 .8
96.7
4 .3
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H ( in H20 )=
P ( in H20)=
Temperature
Weight=
Weight^
(F
(F
)
)
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Root of Delta P (in H'20 )=
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches ) =
Stack Axis ttl (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches ) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight., ( g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
81
1 .32
0.071
428
29.04
28.56
0.2453
100.5
0.83
175.0
0.417
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,081
34,708
20,202
19,325
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12°= CO
0.0000 0.0000
A 127
-------
* * METRIC UNITS *
FILE NAME - semivZ
RUN ft - m5svkn2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:20:33
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 16.005
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 18.910
Meter Factor= 1.021
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 2.966
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 2.844
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 744
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -3
Percent Oxygen= 18 .8
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 1 .8
Moisture Collected (ml )= 96.7
Percent Water= 4.3
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Average Meter Temperature (C ) =
Average Delta H (mm H20 )=
Average Delta P ( mm H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (C ) =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
27
33.4
1 .8
220
29.04
28.56
1 .2362
100.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 175.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm)= 10.59
Stack Axis ttl (Meters)= 1.727
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )= 1.727
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 2.983
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 329
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 983
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 572
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 547
'**.
<""
t*
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. ( mg/cu m)= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.00
No Back Half Analysis
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CO
0.0 0.0
A 128
-------
FILE NAME - semiv2
RUN # - m5svkn2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point tf
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:20:34
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.005
0.075
0.150
0 .110
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.050
0.135
0.005
0.020
0.065
0.125
0.125
0 .125
0.130
0.080
0.065
0.030
0.125
0.120
0 .060
0.030
0.005
'Delta H
(in. H20)
0.09
1 .45
2 .60
2.20
2.00
0.18
0.22
0.54
0.91
2.45
0 .09
0 .40
1 .10
2 .40
2 .40
2.30
2.40
1 .45
1 .10
0 .54
2.30
2.18
0 .99
0.50
0.10
Stack
(F)
417
403
407
435
434
412
414
431
434
439
400
391
431
432
434
433
436
441
440
439
442
440
441
440
436
T .
In(F
73
74
75
81
83
79
80
81
81
84
80
80
81
83
86
82
84
85
86
86
84
86
88
88
87
Meter T
) Out(F)
72
72
73
74
77
78
78
79
79
80
78
79
79
80
81
82
82
82
83
83
84
83
84
84
85
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction Final
(g)
PROBE RINSE . 0.0000
IMPINGERS f.^ 0.0000
Probe Rinse BlanK&(ing/ml )=
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Wt. fare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
o.oooo
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Wt.
Tare
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Wt
Vol
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0 .0000
Impinger Blank (rrigXml )= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0080 70.0000
0.0060 105.0000
A 129
-------
N
O MOISTURE
R CORR
a
= °
~ o
*" Q ~d
s o;
1 i S
o
o
a
UJ
u.
V
xj
^
K
iii
add
O "J Q Q
Al
if
U
Ul
u
^
1
|
5 S
a
c
o
=2.
z
Al
u
Ul
CJ
§
I
u
Z
«o
Al
Al
u
u7
u.
5
v>
xc
Ul
u
SJ»
z
I
1
<
CO
<
1
a
z
i
s
_1
E
z
u.
£
t*
3
Ul
2
"
in
Al
S*
Al
2*
£
»
^
3
U
<
»
Z
u.
u
r>
V!
^
«
i
^^v
\ \(^
Ul
a
f ui 2
iii
* § X
* * ^
CO
Ul
=
o
_J
<
X
"-
_J
Jg
Ul
u
z
UJ
oc
UJ
u.
LL.
O
o.a.o
A 130
-------
C
QC
<\o-
^^>
r-ao
QO
VD
00
03
M?
A
m
i
rv,X
r
C^ NO
V
\0
r-
X)
t^
cr
C-.O
V NO
«S.>"N
ODQ?
^~OD
CO
\->u
Co
rC-
oo
ao°°
££
V
CO
O
A
A
00
CO
u>
CX)
O-
^
r-
•50
C'S
(S
N^NlN
V
UJ
\
A
rSc<
ri^
r-«Cb
Vo
Wj
Nt7
5
r-
N»
V
so
NtS
00
•QO
%
As*
t?
>«A
\ocr-
0^0)
vp
**%
o
To
r-
3-
r-
o
0%
U
cc ^
r- r-
IN,
*>-4
c\
VCJD
00
tt>C3C<5i
NTtp.^-
^30
cr
rvjo-jvr
9
*>
r~
NO
vj>
H
^cr
o -*
cro^
\^
•So-
vD
Q
Ok
vj)
r-t-
$*.
o^ o-
CN
vj
A
vD
Ci
CN>
0
o
%
%
00
00
Qo
/^
^
-\
Q
I
A 131
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No.
Client/Source:
Source Location:
Sampling Location:
Run No. ^5
Set up person(s): ."7"
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By J
4601.01.05.01
Belden Brick Company
Sugar Creek, Ohio
Kiln Stack No.3
Sampling Train No.
~ I
Sample Box No. Oil
Date li-fa-73
Sample Box Leak Check: cfrn @
Received By Date/Time K~/o~'93
Jn.Hg vacuum
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
Cyclone**
Flask**
90° Bypass**
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
Condenser
Thermowell U-Connector
XAD-2 Resin Cartridge
U-Connector (A)
1st Impinger
(2-L** Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (B)
2nd Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (C)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (D)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)**
U-Connector (F)**
SjbJmpingor (Mod=Q6-S)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Initial Weights
(grams)***
Empty Loaded
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
LF-1
Thermocouple No.:
~65 grams XAD-2 Resin
Empty
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
100 mLs
ASTM Type II Water
Empty
— 200 g indicating silica gel
-900 ^ inrljftfltinfl cili^a rjnl
HI Li
733.1
Note: Components in italics used only with MRI-style organic module. Do not use for PAHs.
* Nozzle openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe liner inlet sealed with
Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling. Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with
hexane-rinsed aluminum foil before and after sampling.
* * Optional for low/high particulate/moisture gas streams as applicable.
*** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here. All exchange
component openings covered with hexane-rinsed aluminum foil.
**** Cartridge weighed with blank-offs in place; then, covered with aluminum foil to seal out light during
storage and sampling.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 132
-------
MODIFIED SW-846, M0010 - SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TRAIN FOR SV-POHCs (MM5SV)
_ FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601 .01 .05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
J?
Run No.
Transfer for Recovery:
Sampling Train No. «S"t/- /
Sample Box No. O
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s):_
Probe recovery person(s):
Received By
Date/Time /V-/o-?_? ZL&y,o
Date //-/-a-^_?
Date
RESIN CARTRIDGE AND IMPINGERS RECOVERY
Impinger: XAD Cartridge
Final Wt.(g) .V77.V
Initial Wt.(g)
Net Wt.(g)
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
-ft. Y.I
6th
. 7
13. »»»» 1-4 <«««««
% Blue
Sample Number: ^ j 039
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
s3040
~7<£ *f. ~? Before Rinses
Components Rinsed**: 1st-4th impingers, U-connectors A-E
<--Recovery of 2nd-4th Impingers and
U-connectors C-E Optional
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
7 After Rinses
FILTER RECOVERY AND TRAIN RINSES
FILTER
Sample Number: —3 037
Description and Color:
^-s
TRAIN RINSES Sample Number: -3 036/038
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g) /7/.f
Components Rinsed***: nozzle, probe liner, cyclone/flask or bypass, filter holder, short 90° connector.
condenser, thermowell U-connector
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
/;
-------
FILE NAME - semivS
RUN # - m5svkn3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic"Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )-
670.062
784 .002
1 .021
0.005
116 .333
110.755
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08:46:59
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
29.30
-0.12
Percent Oxygen= 17.8
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Moisture Collected (ml)= 118.7
Percent Ulater= 4.8
Average Meter Temperature (F )= 85
Average Delta H (in H20 )= 1.54
Average Delta P (in H20 )= 0.085
Average Stack Temperature (F )= 438
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight^ 28.53
Average Square Root of Delta P (in K20)= 0.2707
% Isokinetic= 100.5
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes )= . 175.0
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= 0.419
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )= 68.0
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches ) = 68.0
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 32.11
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 1,200
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 38,537
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 22,184
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 21,118
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight. (g )= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t )= 0.0000
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )= 0.00
No Back Half Analysis
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CC
0.0000 0.0000
A 134
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
F.ILE NAME - semiv3
RUN 8 - m5svkn3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT « - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08:47:01
Average Meter Temperature (C) =
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P ( mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C) =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight^
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)-
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (mm )=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min)=
m/min)=
Cubic m/min)
Cubic m/min)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m):
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
18.973
22.200
1 .021
0 .0001
3 .294
3 .136
744
— "3
17.8
2.2
118.7
4.8
29
39.1
2.1
226
29.06
28.53
1 .3643
100 .5
0.83
175.0
10.64
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
366
1 ,091
628
598
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.00
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12°b CO
0.0 0.0
A 135
-------
FILE NAME - semiv3
RUN tt - mSsvknS
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
03-07-1994 08:47:01
oint ft
1
j.
^
O
^f
4
5
s
o
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(in. H20 )
0.135
0.135
0.135
0 .030
0 .025
0.140
0 .145
0.105
0.065
0.025
0 .010
0.035
0.075
0 .145
0 .135
0.010
0 .010
0.025
0 .095
0 .155
0.020
0 .065
0.120
0 .185
0 .090
'Delta H
(in. H20)
2 .43
2 .43
2.43
0 .55
0 .50
2 .54
2 .64
1 .91
1 .18
0.45
0 .18
0 .64
1 .36
2.63
2.43
0.18
0 .18
0.45
1 .73
2 .83
0.36
1 .22
2.19
3.39
1 .64
Stack
(F)
440
441
443
436
436
438
440
440
443
442
429
432
443
445
446
431
430
436
440
441
431
417
442
443
444
T
In(F
80
81
84
83
83
82
86
87
88
88
85
85
85
87
90
87
86
86
87
88
87
87
88
90
91
Meter T
) Out(F)
78
79
80
81
81
81
83
84
84
84
85
84
84
85
85
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
86
r
?
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS ;''
Probe Rinse Blank>;(mg/ml )=
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Final
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
ig/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Wt. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
o.oooo
Vol .
(ml)
0.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(g)
.0000
.0000
A 136
-------
A.2.4 Kiln Volatile Organic Compounds
A 137
-------
A 138
-------
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Project No.
Client _
Facility.
Source Ms)* •#• 3
Sampling Location X/^/» D
sec.
sec.
sec.
sec.
Clock
Time
24-Hr
/-5^t>
/&&S
;33o
s&f
Jfto
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading (L)
£>,£>O
y,af
SD.OL
/S",/O
#t>.00
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
/6>,t
S&.3
S&.J
/s-,1
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
/y*
yy/^
yyy,^"
/v/,y
Tenax
Inlet
Temp. (°C)
sc,»
/o.o
Rotameter
Setting
/3D
}*9
/3V
J30
COMMENTS:
t»1* KV MM*IH 0
A 139
-------
Project No.
Client _
Facility.
Source
Sampling Location X///7 >rg
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Run No.
Operator _
Co.
VOST Console No. S
VOST Unit No. S'
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg) _
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft)
Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Tenax Inlet Thermocouple No. ^-.
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) //o
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) ^o
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in)
- o
Temperature Meter No. Y-Q-7& V
Temperature Controller No. _
Temperature Meter No.
Probe Length (in)
Probe Liner Material
_ Liner Material
Tenax Tube No. *
Tenax/Charcoal Tube No. ^
Field Blank Tenax Tube No. 2
Field Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No. '.
Z34& Sample No. /t>6*
(tfZ Sample No. /WO
S'S't' Sample No. /O7&*
J6>9 Sample No. StryL
Trip Blank Tenax Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Sample No. /&??
Sample No.
/07J
M.14
&6.0O
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
Jf,>f
/&&
SS;o
/v.t.
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
//7
/6*Sk
/0,3
SO'J
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
S3.o
/X*P
/&.*
/2>o
Rotameter
Setting
S3»
S30
/Zt>
/Jo
COMMENTS:
A 140
-------
Project No.
Client VJ
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Run No.
Operator _
Facility
Source J£>J si
#3
Sampling Location.
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg) _
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft)
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) // o
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) **°
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in).
Date \
/&j£'
S6*o
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading (L)
0,00
&o3
?,99
/&0-2-
&o,oo
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
S3'?
S3.&
J-3.3'
/3,^>
/vv.^
Tenax
Inlet
Temp. (°C)
/e,f
9.V
-------
Project No..
Client t>J
Facility.
Source
Sampling Location
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg) _
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft)
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Run No.
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) /. o
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) -&Q
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in)
Date
Operator J.
VOST Console No.
VOST Unit No.
/
Meter Calibration Factor (Y) _
Tenax Inlet Thermocouple No.
Temperature Meter No. _
Temperature Controller No.
V-SL
Temperature Meter No. X-
Probe Length (in) 3C.
Probe Liner Material
Liner Material
Tenax Tube No.
Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Field Blank Tenax Tube No.
Field Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Condensate Sample No.
Sample No. /P-73
Sample No. _
Sample No..
Sample No..
Sample No. S&77
Sample No. _
Leak Check from Probe Inlet:
Before Sampling J/tf
After Sampling 0
in. Hg change at
in. Hg change at
Leak Check from Valve at Inlet to First Condenser:
Before Sampling 0 in. Hg change at _
After Sampling ^ in. Hg change at _
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
sec.
sec.
sec.
sec.
Clock
Time
24-Hr
/4^»
X^^ar
/7t>o
s?^
;?/£>
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading (L)
6,00
&,e>j
/fi.oy
/tr,eo
#0,00
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
/^^?
;?.<)
/**-7
ja.(*
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
x-*^7
/1>&2.
. '*57t
&,-?
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
/5?/^>
s#.o
/*.»
S&t>
Rotameter
Setting
/&D
S30
S3v
/&t>
COMMENTS:
*»t* XV iMMkfn fl
A 142
-------
Project No.
Client _j
Facility.
Source
Sampling Location J<*'l* *3
Co
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft)
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Run No.
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) /< t?
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) **°
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in)
Date
Operator J^
VOST Console No.
VOST Unit No.
Meter Calibration Factor (Y) ;
Tenax Inlet Thermocouple No.
Temperature Meter No. V~i
Temperature Controller No. A>^-t>t>9> 0*i{$y 6>Joo
Temperature Meter No.
Probe Length (in)
Probe Liner Material.
Liner Material
Tenax Tube No..
Tenax/Charcoal Tube No..
Field Blank Tenax Tube No.
Field Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
&OZC,
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Condensate Sample No.
Leak Check from Probe Inlet:
Before Sampling
After Sampling
in. Hg change at
in. Hg change at
Leak Check from Valve at Inlet to First Condenser:
Before Sampling O in. Hg change at
After Sampling O in. Hg change at
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
sec.
sec.
sec.
sec.
Clock
Time
24-Hr
/?/£"
JVZV
/71&
/?3o
S73*
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading (L)
0>OO
&VJ
so,c&-
/^oS"
xo,ot>
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
/3>+
M>)
J&)
M.V
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
y«57^
/v^;/
yV57f
/**:*
Tenax
Inlet
Temp. (°C)
9^
9.3
?.V
9.^-
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
/?•*>
tf>D
tf(Q
J4.V
Rotameter
Setting
y«7f
JSV
A?t>
J3V
COMMENTS:
A 143
-------
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Project No.
Client _
Facility.
Source
Sampling Location >6V*»
Run No. £
Operator J>
VOST Console No. _,
VOST Unit No. .5"
Date
sS'
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg).
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft).
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) />o
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) ^P
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in) So
Meter Calibration Factor (Y) _,
Tenax Inlet Thermocouple No.
Temperature Meter No. _.
Temperature Controller No.
Temperature Meter No.
Probe Length (in).
Probe Liner Material.
Liner Material
Tenax Tube No.
Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Field Blank Tenax Tube No.
Field Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Mf
f &* y^*?
f ^f * ~^
XStt
M7
Jott,
JJH?t>
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
30W
&0?D
?0*S-
Ho-yL
2c77
?07'
MSf
J?tf>
j»af
Dry Gas
Meter
Reading (L)
0,00
W7
*.9<*
/^.oo
#0.00
Dry Gas
Meter
Temp. (°C)
S*J
Jf,0
M>2
S£3
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
y*^:^
/**;*'
W&.3
S*SJ*
Tenax
Inlet
Temp. (°C)
V
A?
&*
&/
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
Sf.O
tf.v
ssr*o
JS>.f>
Rotameter
Setting
y«7Z7
yjTZ?
X7o
J30
COMMENTS:
-n KV M« km o
A 144
-------
Project No.
Client us
Facility.
Source
Sampling Location SV)n?t3
#3
Barometric Pressure (in. Hg)
Site to Barometer Elevation (ft)
Corrected BP (0.1 in/100 ft)
VOST SAMPLING DATA
SW-846, METHOD 0030
Desired Probe/STL Temperature (°C)
Desired Flow Rate (Liters/min) Ao
Desired Sample Volume (Liters) ^»
Heated Sample Transfer Line Length (in)
Run No. ^.
Operator ^
Date
VOST Console No.
VOST Unit No.
Meter Calibration Factor (Y)
Tenax Inlet Thermocouple No.
Temperature Meter No,
Temperature Controller No. A07 Dv?)
Temperature Meter No. Y*
Probe Length (in) 3(*
Probe Liner Material GSssJ
Liner Material
Tenax Tube No..
Tenax/Charcoal Tube No..
Field Blank Tenax Tube No..
Field Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No..
Trip Blank Tenax Tube No.
Trip Blank Tenax/Charcoal Tube No.
Sample No.
Sample No. ?O7'Z-
Sample No..
Sample No..
Sample No.
Sample No.
Condensate Sample No.
Leak Check froni Probe Inlet:
Before Sampling A/A
After Sampling 0
in. Hg change at
in. Hg change at
Leak Check from Valve at Inlet to First Condenser:
Before Sampling 6 in. Hg change at
After Sampling O in. Hg change at
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
in. Hg vacuum for
fro
sec.
sec.
sec.
sec.
Clock
Time
24-Hr
/&&
//*c?
/v
J*.^
Probe/STL
Temp. (°C)
MW
/VStS*
S*&3
yV57s/
Tenax
Inlet
Temp. (°C)
8rt
Ko
?4
7,f
Pump
Vacuum
(in. Hg)
/#.
Rotameter
Setting
/JO
S3®
S3o
J30
COMMENTS:
*»1t KV twwM O
A 145
-------
A 140
-------
A.2.5 Kiln Inorganic/Organic Gases
A 147
-------
A 148
-------
f x f* ^^± ^5 ^^ ^O ^3 ^O ^O ^O ^? ^O ^O ^3 ^O ^O ^3 ^O ^0 ^3 ^3 C3 ^O ^O ^0 ^O ^O ^3 ^^ ^O LO
™T* *5 o) OF) 00 GO 00 ^^ C^7 00 ^3 ^^ ^p^ ^^ 0) ^^ ^^ CO 00 C75 ^7) ^7) Oi ^3 T*~ v™ ^^ ^~™ O) ^^ ^^
LNB /^ T** ^" ^^ 7"* T^™ T™* Tn™ V C^ ^^ ^^ C^ T^ T^ T"™ ^^ ^™ Y*"" T""* ^^ T™ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
cvi^inintopinpcoptnoqoqininoqpcocoincopppcocqcqinpptn
^^^ ^^ T"™ ^* ^^m T*™ C^ ^«^ ^7) T™ ^7) CO ^3 ^7) O) O5 ^J C^ C? ^3 C3 ^3 C5 ^3 ^5 ^7J O) ^7) ^^ ^3 ^3
C^5 ^^ C^3 fQ C^J C^) C^^ (^) t^^ ^O ^O C^J (^) bD ^3 U3 C^5 CO C^) (^D C^) CO C^) CO C^5 l^O ^O UO CO CO C^3
j^ C i^j ^O ^O ^O LO ^O LO ^O ^O LO ^O fcO ^O ^0 ^0 ^0 ^O ^O ^0 ^O ^0 ^O ^0 ^O LO ^O ^O ^O ^O
^^ ^^ ^O If) ^O ^O ^O ^O l^) LO ^O ^0 ^O ^O ^O ^O ^O LO ^O ^O ^O 1^) LO ^O ^O ^O l^^ ^O 1^5 L^5 LO
^jr ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
^ CO ^^
vJ ii' ^^ , |. OQ CO 00 CO C^3 CC) C^) C^) ^^" T** ^«^ CO ''^ C^^ ^0 ^0 CO CO CO ^O ^f CO CO CO CO ^™™ CO ^0 CO
c™ T^ ^^i ^? ^75 O) ^75 ^75 ^75 C7) ^7) O5 ^J ^^ O) ^7^ CJ5 ^7) Oi 00 O5 ^7) ^75 O) ^75 ^75 O5 O5 O5 ^7) ^75 ^7^ '^J
CC^ 1-T-1-T-1-7--1-T- l-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-l-l-T-'r-l-T-T-T-T-T-lr-
^L ^^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^3 ^^ ^j ^3 ^7) ^75 ^75 ^7) 00 CO ^^ ^^ CO 00 ^^ CO Oi ^75 ^3 ^5 ^7) ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^^
^^ C^L ••••••• ^» ^^ ^^ ^« ^« ^» ^» ^» ^^ ^^ ^« ^^ ^» ^» • • ^« • • • • •
• ^ ^-_^* ^^" ^^^ T"™ T"~ ^^ ^^ ^»» ^j ^J ^^ Qj ^^ ^j ^^ t_J Cj ^J ^-_^ ^J ^^ ^J T™" T^ ^^ T™"* ^^ T™~ ^^ T^
w^oqujcqcqcqppincqcoincocopcpcocopppppiopppiopiq
CO Q.toi«U)U5lf>ScOCOtDCDCOCO(D O5 O) ^^ ^j O5 ^7^
„j ^^ t^ ^*"^ ^^ ^NJ C^J ^^ ^^ ^\& ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ '^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^"~ ^ *"
CC T-
aj'Si— COCOCOCOOCOOCOCOCOOOCOCOCOCOOOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO
2Qr— T— 1— T-T-t— 1— •>— T-T-T-T— 1— f— T-T-T— T-f— T— T—T-T-lr—T— 1—T— T— T— 1—
C_5 f™ ^O ^O ^^ ^O ^O ^O l^^ U^ ^O ^O ^3 ^3 ^3 ^^ ^O ^O ^O ^O ^O ^O ^^ ^O ^O ^^ ^O ^O ^^ ^O ^O
T" ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ C75 ^^ ^^ ^^ 00 ^^ CO OO CD ^7) CO Co ^^ ^™* ^^ T"* T*^ ^^ c^j O5 ^75 T"™ ^3 T™* ^^ ^7)
CJ^eq«cocou>«oiqpco»coiou)pcqinpeopu5pcqppppinpcq
^^^ ^^L ^^ ^7) ^3 T"* Y™* T™* T*™ ^^ ^^ C^ CO C^ ^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^ CO CO ^^ C^ T™ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ T™" T™~ c~3
C^) ^^ Tf"» T** ^\l ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^M ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ 0^1 0^ OJ 00 OJ C^ ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^^
^^ ^™ ^o ^o ^o ^o ^fy 10 ^o ^o ^^ ^5 ^o ^v> ^^ i^) ^o ^o ^^ ^o ^o ^^ CD ^3 ^o CD ^^ ^o ^o LO 1^5
x-s C. **..*
^^ C» ^O l^D CO ^O f^ ^O CO ^O CD CO CO LO ^^ ^^ ^O 00 00 CO OO CO ^O ^3 ^^ CO 00 CO ^^ c^j 00
/ ^ ^^ C^) ^^* 00 00 00 ^^ ^^ C^7 ^^ ^^ 00 ^^ O) C^7 ^0 ^O C^7 C^3 C^7 C^7 C^7 C^7 CO C^3 ^O LO ^O ^O ^^
JL* CO
^^ ^!L_ ^^ .,, ^^ CO T"* u"» IF** CO ^^ ^O 1^^ ^3* CO ^^* ^^ ^^ CO ^3 ^™ CO CO CO CO CO ^*J* ^^ ^^ CO CO CO CO
®.-CD IOOT-CVJ
c5E cococococo^1^^
OJOji— OOOOOOOO
Z Q
IO CP ^^ CO 05 C? ^™ C^ CO ^^
S^^ ^* ^T ^* ^O lO LO U^ IO
ooooooooo
CO^COO>OT-CVJCO
UJLOLOIOOOOO
OOOO^-i--r-^
-------
T^WW-i^T-'WWcvidc\icvic\c\cvcocNJCNic\iT-'Y-'c\icM
oqqcoooppoqu)oqococoqcoqcocoinqqoqiqoqoqoqoqcoqqoqoqcqiq
8T-T-QOO>ODCOCOOiOOOpCOOOOOCOCOO'l$O>tv-COCOCQCOCOCJ)O)O)COOOOOCp
cQiococ5u>u5wwwu5wiou)^coco^cowinwinwwioioiflU5inu5ioio
tninqinqtnqioq
coinc9c9cccinincinaqincocincocQu)inininiu)iccin
'
U)U)
(O
(OCO(Oeowqcqu5coqcqcqoocoincqcqiqcoir>qcqex3inu>
S*QQQQOQOc>ooT^^iocviesicc5i*«.'^cocoeoeococvi'r^^-:'r-''i-:oooo
CD(O(O
gQT-T-t-i-T-
^tcoT
co co o
10
co
CVJ
s
CO CO CO
OJ O *-
moo
'*
co
o
O> O -r- CVJ
W t-' i-: W T-' T^ W T^ cvi cvi c\i cvi ^ ^-" T-: cvi CM* c\i cvi evi ^ W W cxi oo cj co cvi T-' T-'
qcou)cqqqcqu)cpqeoqu)iAcpcpcpqcou)qu)qqcpcpeqcpcpinu)cooq
loqioqqqqqqqqqiqqioqqqqqqqqqqqqqqiqqiqq
(dcD(dcDCDCDCDc^CDC^CDc«cpScococpcpcocococpoocpcpcpcocpcoqN
a)COO)
-------
ommwmmoinominQmmooomommooointnoooooioo
CO CO CO CM CO ^^ ^^ CO CO ^*^ C^J ^0 ^* ''•« ^O CO ^r CO ^^* CO ^O ^M ^* ^T ^T ^O ^0 C£3 1^? xf ^M ^^ ^^)
^M ^\J C^ C^ C^ i^M ^M ^^ C^ ^M ^^ ^M ^M ^M ^M ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^m ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ C^ ^^ ^^ ^^ CO CO
inincocoinininoqoqoqcqcqoqoqininco p oq oqcqcooqincqcoincoinininpin
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
u5ininininininin'ininu)ininininininuju)ininin'inihinininin'iniriininin
CMoiddcMCMCMCVJWCMOICJCNJWCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMWWCMCMCMW
u)u)c9cooqpoqoqoqoqpu)pcocoppppcotqiopcococopoqcocooqcop
00 CO CO CO OO OJ C3 C35 O) O) 00 00 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O) T"~ O O CD CD CD O) O) O^ CO 00
O) CO 00 00 CO CO O) 00 OO 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 CO GO 00 CO CO O) O) C^ O) O) O) 00 CO 00 CO 00
CM co co co co co co co co co co ^^ ^^ ^^ ^f ^^ ^f ^^ ^f ^^ ^f* in in to in in in in in in in ^^ CD
COCDCOCOCCSCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCOh-N-
ooininininoooinooininoinoooininominoininoininooo
u)incqpinpinincooqoqcoincopppcou)U5inpcqu5in(X5inpppcocqco
COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCDCDCOCO
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
cdcocdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcocdcdcdcdcDcocdcdcDcdcdcDccicDcdcdcDcdcdcdcdcD
incocoinincqininwcocococqujinpininwpinoou^coincopcqppininin
T~ T~ CO ^^ CD lO CO CO CO Oi CO ^" CO CO ^" Q^ CO ^O CO lO lO T1™ ^D CO Q) CO IO CO CO CO CO IO ^^"
^^ ^D CD ^j ^5 ^3 ^5 T~ C? ^3 ^5 C3 ^3 ^~ ^3 ^J ^5 ^3 ^J ^3 C3 i^ T~ ^^ ^j ^^ CD C3 ^5 ^3 ^5 C5 C)
C^ ^^ Cvj C^ CM CM CM CM CM ^M CM CM CM CM CM ^M CM CM CM ^M CM ^M CM CM CM CM CM ^M CM CM CM ^M CM
T-"T^^T^T^T^T^-r^T^l^W^T-*T^T^^^T^WT^T^T-'T^T^^T^C\iCMeSlCVi^CaC\i
coincoincocqu)cqincocopcooqppoqinoqcocoinu)inincocoinininin
fs^ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO ^JJ ^J) ^3) ^35 CJ) ^3) ^^ ^^J ^35 C5 ^5 ^™ ^^ T™* ^^ ^^J ^M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
^^ ^^ ^tf* "'^ ^« ^r ^r ^r ^^ ^^ ^J* ^^ ^f ^f ^n ^^ ^^ ^O ^O i^O LO ^O ^O ^O 1^^ ^R ^^s ^O ^O ^O ^O ^O i^^
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
cdcdcococdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcDcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcdcd
cqpcqcqcoppincoinininin co in incqcqcqcqoqinincqppcopcocqpinco
ppo>o>oSppppppppppppppppppppppppppp'p
-------
WC$COOCMCMCM'oCM'CAi««eO««««W««O««OWC9
oomoococoinininininincooocooocoinooocoeooQ
g
inininininin
ininin
ininininin
pppppppppppppppppppppppppp
in'iriuiiriuiiriiriiriiriiriiriiriiriiriiriin'iriiriiriiriiriiriiriiriiriiri
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
pcocopcocoiqineococooqinoqoqoqinincocoiqcocopcop
CO CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO CO
s
in
CM
O)
in
o>
CM
CM
CO
OD
inmininininoooooinoinooinoininooinooo
CMOCMT-T-CMT-CMCMCMCMCMCOCOCOCVJ-i-CMCMCOCOTfrCOCOeOOO
CM
innininoqoqincqpppcqincocooqininincocotncocococo
CO(OCOCO
58
CM' cvi
ocvcvcvjc\cvc\e\icvocvc\c\icvicxce\iwcvieNcdco(dcdcd(d(O(ocdco(d(o
8
coocooomiocou)oou)u)coooooocomoooioooootnooGO
S
in
CMC\icvJCMCMCMCVJCMC4CMCMCMCMCviCMCM'CMCViCMCMCM'CMCVJCMCMCM
m
O)
2
Ki A -i K
-------
Concentration of Methane and Ethane
determined by GC/FID in Kiln Stack Emissions November 11, 1993
TIME
1203
1205
1352
1354
1612
1615
1658
1701
1707
CONCENTRATION (ppmv)
5.7
7.4
5.5
4.6
4.6
4.9
4.8
5.0
5.3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
< 3
A 153
-------
REFERENCE METHOD MONITORS
PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION
MRI-MVZ46CH-01.TBL
A 154
-------
KILN
Calibration Error Check
Cal. gas value
6.20
11.98
0
424
218
102
0
448
248
124
0
380
239
103
0
90.2
51.3
29.5
0
Measured value
C02
6.20
11.95
0.13
CO
424
221
102
0.3
NO,
454
254
127
6.5
SO,
380
241
100
0.0
THC
90.7
50.4
29.4
0
% Error
0
0.3
1.1
0
0.7
0
0.1
1.3
1.3
0.7
1.6
0
0.5
0.8
0
0.6
1.6
0.3
0
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MRI-M\Z4601-01.TBL
A 155
-------
KILN
Response Time Checks
Analyzer
C02
CO
NOX
S02
THC
Rise time (sec)
63
65
80
74
40
Fa^f time (sec)
52
75
110
69
45
Dryer Response Time Check
Analyzer
Rise time (sec)
Fall time (sec)
THC
95
106
MRI-M\Z4601-01.TBL
A 156
-------
KILN
Bias Check
Cal. gas value
6.20
218
238
230
51.3
Measured value % Error
CO,
6.13 0.6
CO
225 1.7
NOX
248 2.2
SO;
239 2.7
THC
50.8 0.6
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Percent Drift (Run 1)
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Initial Final % Error
CO,
0.13 0.13 0
11.95 11.93 0.2
CO
0.3 0.5 0.04
425 426 0.2
NOX
6.5 6.0 0.1
454 454 0
SO,
0.0 0.0 0
380 380 0
THC
0.0 0.7 0.8
90.7 90.6 0.1
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MRI-MM4601-01 TBL
A 157
-------
KILN
Percent Drift (Run 2)
Initial Final % Error Pass/Fail
CO,
Zero 0.13 0.12 0.1 Pass
Span 11.93 11.95 0.2 Pass
CO
Zero 0.5 0.8 0.1 Pass
Span 426 422 0.9 Pass
NO*
Zero 6.0 5.4 0.3 Pass
Span 454 452 0.4 Pass
SO,
Zero 0.0 0.2 0.1 Pass
Span 380 381 0.3 Pass
THC
Zero 0.7 0.6 0.1 Pass
Span 90.6 90.5 0.1 Pass
MRI-M\Z4601-01 TBL
A 158
-------
KILN
Percent Drift (Run 3)
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Zero
Span
Initial
0.12
11.95
0.8
422
5.4
452
0.2
381
0.6
90.5
Final
CO,
0.10
11.94
CO
0.0
423
NO,
5.0
446
SO,
0.0
378
THC
0.7
90.6
% Error
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.1
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
MRI-M\24601-01 TBL
A 159
-------
213-585-215-1
FAX* 213-535-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
70Q SOUTH ALAMEQA STREET • LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA SCC:3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS / EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. & INDUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
PROPANE
P.0 NUMBER 092193-1
REFERENCE STANDARD
NTST SRM NO. CYLINDER NO.
166 7b
CLM-005042
CONCENTRATION
47.3 ppm
R=REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER READINGS
Z=ZEXO CAS
C=GAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT PROPANE
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
20 R 58386
R 59250 Z 0
Z 0 C 64093
U/M uV
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N HP 5890 SERIES II S/N 3310A48533
GC/ FLAME IONIZATION
09/28/93
C 63294 CONC.
C 64278 CONC.
R 59056 CONC.
MEAN TEST ASSAY
51.3 ppm
51.3 ppn*
51.3 ppn.
51.3 ppra
Z
R
Z
U/M uV
LAST CALIBRATION DATE 07/08/93
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R C CONC.
Z C CONC.
C R CONC.
MEAN TEST ASSAY
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 8784
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION 3.0.4
OF TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY ± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
CYLINDER PRESSURE 2000 PSIG
CERTIFICATION DATE 09/28/93
EXPIRATION DATE 03/28/95 TERM 18 MONTHS
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
PROPANE 51.3 pp
-------
£'i-£l-~4 10:46 B^UIRONMENTRL flND INDUSTRIFL DIST. EID 6BB P0S
LIQUID CARBONIC
SPECIALTY GAS CORPORATION
5700 SOUTH ALAMSOA STREET • LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058
213586-215-4
FAX»213585-OS82
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS I EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. A IMDUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
PROPANE
P.O NUMBER 021293-3
REFERENCE STANDARD
MST SUM NO.
vs. 1668b
CYLINDER NO.
SA 5909
CONCENTRATION
95.3 pp.
Jt=RKFERENCB STANDARD
ANALYZER READINGS
Z=ZEKO GAS
C=GAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT PROPANE
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 738
R 742 20
Z 0 C 693
U/M uV
ANAI.Y-/.KR MAKE-MODEL-S/N HP 5890 Series II S/H 3108A3U09
GC/ Thermal Condoctivjty
03/04/93
C 703 CONC. 90.6 ppm Z
C 701 CONC. 90.0 ppm K
R 735 CONC. B9.9 ppm Z
MEAN TEST ASSAY 90.2 ppm U/M
LAST CAl.lBMATJON DATE 10/26/92
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R C CONC.
Z C CONC.
c a CONC.
MEAN TEST ASSAY
TmS CYLINDER NO. SA 5736
HAS BEEN CERTIKTtt) ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABIL1TY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.4
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
PROPANE 90.2 ppm
ZERO AIR BALANCE
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
± 1 ft NIST TRACEABLK
2000 PSIG
03/02/93
09/02/94
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
K.A. GALLAGHER
K.T. YOUNG
-------
213-585-2154
FAX# 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
3700 SOUTH ALHMEDA STR£=~ • LOS ANGcLES CALIFORNIA 30C5c
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS I EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. & INOUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
PROPANE GHIS
P.O NUMBER
REFERENCE STANDARD
NIST SRM NO.
vs 1667b
CYLINDER NO.
579140
CONCENTRATION
29.3 pcm
R = REFERENCE STAN DA RD
ANALYZER READINGS
Z=ZERQ GAS
C = GAS CANDIDATE
I. COMPONENT PROPANE
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 208
R 208 Z 0
Z 0 C 205
I.YM u1/
GUIS
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N HP 589C Series i: S/N
GC/ Thermal Conductivity
05/24/93
C 206 CONC. 29.5 pora
C 205 CONC. 29.i pcm
R 206 CONC. 29.7 ppm
F.AN TF.ST ASSAY 29.5 oora
R
Z
I;/M uv
LAST CALIBR.A.TION DATE 04/15/55
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R C CONC.
Z C CONC.
C R CONC.
MEAN TF.ST ASSAY
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 6981
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
PROPANE 29.5 pom
AiS 3ALANCH
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
i 1 Tr NIST TRACEABLE
2000 PSIC
05/24/93
11/24/94
RV
-------
213-585-2154
FAX* 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH ALEMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90058
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS / EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. & INDUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
CARBON DIOXIDE GUIS
P.0 NUMBER 072693-1
REFERENCE STANDARD
NIST SRM NO, CYLINDER NO.
vs 1674b
282185
CONCENTRATION
5.01 %
=REFERENCE STANDARD
1. COMPONENT CARBON DIOXIDE GMIS
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0.00 R 5.02
R 5.02 Z 0.00
z 0.00 C 6.20
U/M '/.
NDIR
08/09/93
C 6.20
C 6.22
R 5.02
ANALYZER READINGS
Z=ZERO GAS
C=GAS CANDIDATE
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N Siemens Uttramat 5E S/N A12-730
CONC. 6.19 %
CONC. 6.21 %
CONC. 6.19 %
MEAN TEST ASSAY 6.20
Z
R
Z
U/M X
LAST CALIBRATION DATE 06/06/93
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R C CONC.
Z C CONC.
C R CONC.
MEAN TEST ASSAY
THIS CYLINDER NO. SGAL 1312
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.A
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
CARBON DIOXIDE 6.20 %
NITROGEN BALANCE
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
2000 PSIG
08/09/93
02/09/95 TERM 18
r
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
•4 r»
-------
213 585-2154
FAX * 213 585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
SPECIALTY GAS CORPORATION
5700 SOUTH ALAMECA 5TREHT • LOS ANGe'LES. CALIFORNIA 90053
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS I EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. 4 INDUS!. OIST.
COMPONENT
CARBON MONOXIDE GMIS
P.O NUMBER SG
REFERENCE STANDARD
NIST SRAI .NO.
vs 2636a
CYLINDER NO.
SGAL 2276
CONCENTRATION
236 ppm
it = REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER
Z = ZERO GAS
C = CAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT CARBON MONOXIDE GMIS
ANALY/EKMAKK-MODEL-SA S's-nens Ultramat 5E S/N A12-729
A.NALVTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
7. 0 K 236
R 236 'L 0
/ 0 C 102
U/M ppm
NDIR
08/24/92
C 102
C 102
It 236
CO.NC. 102 ppm
CONC. 102 ppm
CONC. 102 ppm
MKAN TKST ASSAY 102 ppm
7. 0
R 23a
/. 0
L7M ppQ
LAST CALIBRATION DATE
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R 23o C 102
^3 C 102
C :02 K 236
06/06/92
08/31/92
CONC. 102 ppm
CONC. 102 ppm
CONC. 102 ppm
.MEAN TEST ASSAY 102 ppm
| j THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 4810
! HAS UEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
; OF TRACEADILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
l|! PROCEDURE G1
3.0.4
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
CASsC.'J MONOXIDE 102 ppm
NiT^CGE.'i BALANCE
CERTIFIED ACCURACY ± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
j || CYLINDER PRESSURE 1650 I'SIG
I |j CERTIFICATION DATE 08/31/92
! :i EXPIRATION DATE
02/28/94
JJL
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
A A r> «
KUAN T. YOUNG
-------
213-SaS-21&4
FAX* 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH AUVMEOA STREET • LOS ANGfcLtS. CALIFOflNlA 900S8
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS / EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. i INDUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
CARBON MONOXIDE GMIS
P.O NUMBER 092193-1
REFERENCE STANDARD
N1STSRM NO.
vs 2636
CYLINDER NO.
SA 4709
CONCENTRATION
238 PP-
K=REF£X£fJCE STANDARD
\. COMPONENT CARSON MONOXIDE GUIS
ANALYZER HEADINGS
Z=2ERO CAS
C-GAS CANDIDATE
ANALYZKR MAKE-MODEL-S/N Si«m*r>4 Ultranat 5E S/M A12-729
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 238
R 238 Z 0
Z o C 217
U/M ppm
NOIR
09/29/93
C 217
C 217
R 238
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
MEAN TEST ASSAY
217 ppn
217 ppn
217 ppn
217 ppn
Z 0
R 239
Z 0
U/M ppm
LAST CALIBRATION DATE
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R 238 C 218
Z 0 C 218
C 218 R 238
09/02/93
10/06/93
CONC. 210 ppm
CONC. 217 pp»
CONC. 218 ppm
MEAN TEST ASSAY 218 ppn
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 8628
HAS BEEN CERTEETJED ACCORDING T
OF TRACEABrLlTY PROTOCOL NO.
PROCEDURE G1
CEKT1HKU ACCURACY i 1 *
CYLINDER PRESSURE 1650 PSIG
CERTIFICATION DATE 10/06/93
EXPIRATION DATE 10/06/96
0 SECTION 3.0.4
1
NIST TRACEABLE
TERM 36 MONTHS
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
CARBON MONOXIDE 218 pp"
NITROGEN BALANCE
' /" ~"\
^UL • £U
ANALYZED Byrfy&tJ^,
\ w
f),\ t )
MM^-'^
hTK^-XWHWI -.-—
"•• ' - .
CERTIFIED BY s£^__^ ^v-^^^ ^
^ KUAN T. YOUNG
-------
213-585-2154
FAX# 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH ALEMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90058
OF'ANALYSIS'--/".EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. & INDUST. DIST.
COMPONENT
NITRIC OXIDE GMIS
P.O NUMBER 052893-1+2
REFERENCE STANDARD
NIST SRM NO.
vs 1687b
CYLINDER NO.
SGAL 1147
CONCENTRATION
1030 ppm
ANALYZER READINGS
R=REFERENCE STANDARD
Z=ZERO GAS
C=GAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT MITRIC OXIDE
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 961
R 963 Z 0
Z 0 C 418
VIM mV
GMIS
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N Beckman 951A S/N 0101354
Chemi luminescence
06/08/93
C 417 CONC. 447 ppoi
C 418 CONC. 447 ppni
R 963 CONC. 447 ppm
MEAN TEST ASSAY 447 ppm
Z 0
R 963
Z o
LVM mV
LAST CALIBRATION DATE
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R 963 C 419
Z 0 C 419
C 419 R 963
05/27/93
06/18/93
CONC. 448 ppm
CONC. 448 ppm
CONC. 448 ppm
MEAN TEST ASSAY 448 ppm
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA5884
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABDLITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.4
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
NITRIC OXIDE • 448 ppm
NITROGEN BALANCE
NOx 462 ppm
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPDXATION DATE
± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
2000 PSIG
06/18/93
12/18/94 TERM 18 MONTHS
ANALYZED BY
-------
213-585-2154
FAX* 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH ALEMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90058
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS-/* EPA
CUSTOMER ENV. & INDUST. DIST.
P.O NUMBER
REFERENCE STANDARD
COMPONENT
NITRIC OXIDE
GMIS
NIST SRM NO.
vs 1685b
CYLINDER NO.
SA 5692
CONCENTRATION
237 ppm
=REFERENCE STANDARD
ANALYZER READINGS
2=ZERO GAS
C= GAS CANDIDATE
1. COMPONENT NITRIC OXIDE
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 918
R 918 Z .0
Z 0 C 960
U/M mV
GMIS
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N Beckman 951A S/N 0101354
Chemiluminescence
07/29/93
C 960 CONC. 248 ppm Z 0
C 960 CONC. 248 ppm R 929
R 918 CONC. 248 ppm Z 1
MEAN TEST ASSAY 248 ppm U/M mV
LAST CALIBRATION DATE
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R 928 C 967
Z 1 C 969
C 972 R 927
05/27/93
08/05/93
CONC. 247 ppm
CONC. 247 ppm
CONC. 249 ppm
MEAN TEST ASSAY 248 ppm
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 8493
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.4
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
NITRIC OXIDE 248 ppm
NITROGEN BALANCE
NOx 250 ppm
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
2000 PSIG
08/05/93
02/05/95 TERM 18 MONTHS
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
UNG
-------
213-585-2154
FAX* 213-585-0582
LIQUID CARBONIC
CYLINDER GAS PRODUCTS
5700 SOUTH ALEMEDA STREET • LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90053
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS f EPA PROTOCOL GAS
CUSTOMER ENV. & INDUST. DIST.
P.O NUMBER none
REFERENCE STANDARD
COMPONENT
SULFUR DIOXIDE
GMIS
NIST SRM NO.
vs 1661a
CYLINDER NO.
SGAL 2737
CONCENTRATION
243 ppm
R = REFERENCE STANDARD
1. COMPONENT SULFUR DIOXIDE GMIS
ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE NDIR
FIRST ANALYSIS DATE
Z 0 R 243
R 243 Z 0
Z 0 C 239
U/M ppm
04/20/93
C 239
C 239
R 243
ANALYZER READINGS
Z=ZERO GAS
C = GAS CANDIDATE
ANALYZER MAKE-MODEL-S/N Siemens Uitramat 5E S/N C1-009
CONC. 239 ppm
CONC. 239 ppm
CONC. 239 ppm
MEAN TEST ASSAY 239 pptn
Z 0
R 243
Z 0
U/M p
LAST CALIBRATION DATE
SECOND ANALYSIS DATE
R 243 C 238
Z 0 C 239
C 239 R 243
02/18/93
04/27/93
CONC. 238 ppn
CONC. 239 ppo
CONC. 239 ppn
MEAN TEST ASSAY 239 ppn
THIS CYLINDER NO. SA 5811
HAS BEEN CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO SECTION
OF TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL NO. 1
PROCEDURE G1
CERTIFIED ACCURACY
CYLINDER PRESSURE
3.0.4
CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION
SULFUR DIOXIDE 239 ppm
NITROGEN BALANCE
CERTIFICATION DATE
EXPIRATION DATE
± 1 % NIST TRACEABLE
2000 PSIG
04/27/93
10/27/94
ANALYZED BY
CERTIFIED BY
KWAN TAK YOUNG
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
6141 EASTON ROAD. P.O. BOX 310, PLUMSTEADV1LLE, PA 1894&0310 (215) 79M861 FAX (215) 7BM320
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Customer
Midwest Research
425 Volker Blvd
Kansas City, MO 64110-0570
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
6141 Hasten Road
P.O. Box 310
Plumsteadviile, PA 18949-0310
Purchase Order 002276
Scott Project # 01-41110-002
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Certified to exceed the minimum specifications of EPA Protocol 1 Procedure 0G1, Section Number 3.0.4
Cylinder Number AAL8604 Certification Date 09-15-92 General Exp. Date
:•=' /• K CyBiKfer Pressure 2000 psig
Previous Certification Dates None
03-15-9*
Acid Rain Exp. Date 03-15-9^
ANALYZED CYLINDER
• Cgirtponenta
Certified Concentration
103 ppm
Analytical Uncertainty*
±2% NIST Directly Traceable
Balance Ga« Nitrogen
-' ••, >An*iyba) uncertainty b inchnh/e of usual known error source* which at least tnduda referenct itandard error & precision of the measurement pfocfw*
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type Expiration Date
GMIS-
10-24-92
Cylinder Number
ALM020364
Concentration
150 ppm SOj in N7
- .:-.:•. ^INSTRUMENTATION
'
SO2j' Horiba/CFA321 A/56437102
Last Date Calibrated
07-24-92
Analytical Principle
NDLR
ANALYZER READINGS (Z-ZeroCa» R»Rrferenc< Gas T-TestGa» r-Correktion Coeffident)
Components First Triad Analysis
Sutfar Dioxide
Second Triad Analysis
Calibration Curve
Date 09-08-92 Response Units: Volbi
Zl=0.0000 Kl«^)3724 Tl-0.4110
K2-03763 Z2-0.0000 T2-O4U2
Z3-0.0000 T3-0.4109 K3=03746
Avg. Cooc. of Cust Cyl 102 ppm
Date 09-15-92 Rapoiue Units: Volte
Zl-0.0000 R1-05T17 Tl-03983
R2-0.5772 Z2-0.0000 T2-03992
23-0.0000 T3-03997 R3-0.5797
Avg. Cone, of Ciut CyL 103 ppm
Cxjncentratton-A+Bx+Cx^Dx^Ex4
r-0.99999
Comtants: A-O.OOOOE+00
B=O,OOOOE+00 C-O.OOOOE+00
D-O.OOOOE+00 E-O.OOOOE+00
Sjwciil Notes If this product is used for Acid Rain Rule compliance under 40 CFR Part 75, the Acid Rain Expiration Date applies
."-* i I** Appendix H. If for use with other than 40 CFR Part 75 compliance, the General Expiration Date applies.
A 169
Analyst Christine Rush
-------
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
8141 EASTON ROAD, P.O. BOX 310, PLUMST6ADVM1E, PA 18WW310 (215) 78M881 FAX (215) 78M320
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS
Castor
Midwest Research
425 Volker Blvd
Kansas City, MO 64110-0570
Assay Laboratory
Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.
6141 Eastern Road
P.O. Box 310
Plumsteadville, PA 18949-0310
Purchase Order 002276
Scott Project # 01-41110-001
ANALYTICAL INFORMATION
Certified to exceed the minimum specifications of EPA Protocol 1 Procedure #G1, Section Number 3.0.4
Cylinder Number ALM017908 Certification Date 09-10-92 General Exp. Date 03-10-
Gylind«r Pressure 2000 paig Previous Certification Dates None Add Rain Exp. Date 03-10-
Coutyonents
- S*lf« Dioxide
Balance Gas: Nitrogen
Certified Concentration
380 ppm
Analytical Uncertainty*
±1% NIST Directly Traceable
'' ' 'Analytic*! uncertainly is inclusive of tuna] known error »ourc« which at loot Inclixiea reference standard error & precision of the measurement processes.
REFERENCE STANDARD
Type" - Expiration Date
10-22-92
Cylinder Number
1L3063
Concentration
497 ppm SOz in N2
INSTRUMENTATION
SO2:,Horiba/CFA321A/56437102
Last Date Calibrated
07-22-92
Analytical Principle
NDIK
••;;(
••/)
.*i
I'.'l "ANALYZER READINGS (Z=»ZeroGa» R-Reference G«» T'Teat Gas r-CorreJaHon Coefficient)
Components First Triad Analysis
Second Triad Analysis
Calibration Curve
.„-."=«.•.. -' :-.
Dale: 09-O3-92 Kesforae Unite Vdb
23-O.OCXW Rl-a%77 71*13630
R2-0.9666 22-0^000 T2-03543
23-0.0000 T3-OJ532 R3=0.9«»
Avg. Cone of Cmt Cyl. 37g ppm
Date: 09-10-92 Response Unite Vote
Zl-OOOOO R1-OX772 Tl-03637
R2H3.47S8 Z2-0.0000 T2-OJ619
23^1.0000 TJ-03630 R3-0/I749
Avg. Cone, of Curt. Cyl 3gl ppm
Concenlration-A+B)c-t-Cx2+Dx3+Ex4
r-0.99999
Coratuito: A-O.OOOOE+00
B-O.OOOOE+00 C-O.OOOOE+00
D-O.OOOOE+00 E-O.OOOOE+00
•'£•' •*': ' .-^-'^i- «V '.
;', .;-'• -Sped»I Notes If this product is used for Acid Rain Rule compliance under 40 CFR Part 75, the Acid Rain Expiration Date applies
/,;4'Cv ,;.-,? . per Appendix H. If for use with other than 40 CFR Part 75 compliance, the GeneraLExpiration Date applies.
*- '''-"f'C, ~i-'~ "''
\ '•r'^.' '''-^~2'
A 170
Analyst Christine Rush
•??-'..\.:&n-.-. . i=.'VM--..---. W •' •-•- - >:-,'.-,. -V-.v •-'•
:y-'. -...^5.<*t"i <-•--"v'-1—^--" • -••
-------
A.2.6 Kiln HCI/HF/PM
A. 171
-------
A 172
-------
Ui
to
CC
UJ
2 H"
K O
0 J
0 \=,
Si
2 a.
UJ
X
u
m
Q °
r
• — ,
^•*
»
^
;
tx:
^
if
cc
g
;=;
,-sSl
~^
^
v
v»
z
O
UJ
^
-
^.
N
,
-\
"^
— = 1
= 8
S 2 §
m < ""
H Jg > 6
5 s S r §
a a ^
t> S
5
«J
«C
Z
<
z
«
!=
v
s
>• ^
i 1
< <
i ! § i 1 1
? ? 5 S S 3
^
C^
y*-
^
m
•c-
esi
UJ
Z
Z
c>
Al
5?
^t
u
UJ
z
o
s
»—
o
H-
2
^
i
,J
p
z
u.
z
i
c
p
z
-
5-
94
UJ
m
^o
O
in
u
UJ
o
M:
SAMPLE TRAIN LEA
5!
U-
5!
z
X.
u_
S
z
£
CO
2
s
o-
yj
^
V)
r
CO
CM
UJ
_
U)
Al
/\l
^?
/v)
5>
Al
£
Al
z
JE
z"
3
0
O
o
Q
VA
*
O
O
^
o
o
§
^^
60
i8
V)
u
UJ
u
z
I
UJ
z
•a
UJ
3
§
_J
E
z
UJ
o
z
UJ
u.
5
J
^
1
^
_,
z
•c
z
S
UJ
Z
in
Al
Al
01
£
z"
3
<
U.
u
O
n)
UJ
a
>
_i
<•
»—
z
K
^0
^
^3
ru
f
J
T
.r
\Y
Mj
^
^
u
T
«
Z c
3 *
_j «
uj g 3
1 g =
O t= U
» 5 5
1 < 1
U. — J <
CO
Ui
3
s
1
-j
£
Z
UJ
o
z
UJ
UJ
u.
u^
a
coOu.
uj
a:
A 173
-------
o
3
£
J. "
H311U
aaow
ruivvs
d. "dNlL
IQ9NUNI
OH -HI
"OVA dW(U
JS^-iu.
S v -^:«*-
ORIRCE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), In H,0)
K
S3
CO
O
(V
rt
o
Lo
V
O
(V
to
zr
VI
$85
Cv.
tvj
ro
o
0
d
v,
§
0V,
c\
V/1
£cO
V
w
\0
o-
V*
VI
6«LV
3£
v>
vx
CO
cr
cs
53- 3-
^-p
c4t- OQ
CO
c^
Q|tD
d
"7 \9
Cv cS
«ts8^
tO
00
O|
&>
o
00
M
n
^Ofe
< )
ca
N
0
C-^-V
o
t
C)Q'k5
tt
gV,
6
^^-^
V? -._ CO *CN
Rfi
O
O
f
^|S
CO
- V>=
§5SS
rO
vj
r
SSiS^
0- O
O
8
vj» Y>
^r^^
OO
S^
cooo
tr-iq
Cv
^H
x r^
cO c*9
C\
V
Q^?
CO
ri
^r
^ICJ
V:
>S
cy
?b
C
V)
s:
o
~-o
-I
O
-5
^
0>
:>
a
-^
3
V7
^.
V
L
V
~£
-V
!^
A 17-i
-------
A. "dHBl
uanu
aaou
j. "dwii xoe
rumivs
j. "
H39NUW1
"OVA dNfU
S
vS-
.
'S
tu
-
ta«
c-
rr
£l
N
M^o^
to ^ ^
0-p
Vn
CO
8
O6c
e^
^^
O
c >o o d
2zd^3^
s
O
o
00
CO
0
C
Oo
rO
tl>
UJ
i
A 175
-------
JUL 14 '94 15:26 MIDWEST RESEARCH KG
P. 11/22
&
|ll
>-. z z
LU LU
O O
a
1
y £
w
o
6
Q
o
Qoo
O
d
OoO
T- CM
i
1
6 6
M&
T-CM CO
&
CM
O
v^
8
t (3
o •>
c
VI \jt
o>
s •*• v)
I lo
A 176
-------
CO
EC
o
CO
LU
o
I
Q
•z.
o
CD
DC
Q
•z.
LU
co -= -2 22
eo •* •* to •* •*
^] S 5= co 2 z
< LU LU _J LU LU
2 CJ O < O O
g | | ^ | |
o o o £ o o
_
LU
m
i
0
OJ
S £2
< UJ [^ < LU [jj
O m £ O m 5Z
o
Z3
O
C,
O
o
CO
i§
il
O £S
O UJ
LU —J
—> Q.
§
Q.
CO
LU
CO
< 2
LU
2
LU
NG
AC
RE
pJ
i- CM CO
O
OQO
••- CVJ CO
t°.°.
T- CM CO
CM
O
O
00
bo &6 t«i
•t- CM CO
O
c*>
o o-o
CM CO
O; cr
CM CO
§
i
co 5 i
C/3 2 Q
*~ ° 2
2 Q CC
O CE
.59
O
CD
o
a>
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HCl, C12 , AND HF TRAIN (MM5PH
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. / Sampling Tra.in No. rfi ~ /
Set up person (s) : U <\
Transfer to Sampler:
Relinquished By
. J
Sample Box No. 01QL£~!S"
Date II-F -?3
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By Js>~- S>-^^-^
cfm
in.Hg vacuu
Date/Time // '-9 '-? 3 7-'
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
_^_ Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.
50 mLs
0.1 N H^O,
100 mLs
0.1 N H2S04
100 mLs
0.1 N H2S04
Empty
100 mLs
0.1 N NaOH
100 mLs
0.1 N NaOH
-200 g indicating
silica gel
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
a
V7A7
76.3. V
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 178
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HC1, C12 , AND HP TRAIN (MM5PH)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No.
Sampling Train No. r/~/~ I Sample Box No. O//'S/S~
TRAIN PURGE WITH ASCARITE-FILTERED AIR
Condensation in front-half?
Date/Start Time
Transfer for Recovery:
Stop Time
Moisture Removed?
Purged By
Purge Rate: (delta H
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s)
Probe recovery person (s) :.
Received By J ,*
Date
Date II-T-7J
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger: 1st
Final Wt. (g) ~"~" °
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
Initial Wt. (g) ^^7-S^
Net Wt. (g) J.j-3
7th
-77 7,f
.6
s,
I.L
/. V
JS'.O
c l-
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
t Total Condensate Collected
.9
1-3
/ 024
1 026
% Blue
-26.2. .i
Before Rinses
Components Rinsed*: filter support,
filter holder back, short 90° connector
1st-3rd impingers, U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) (aJ.7',^
Net Sample Wt. (g) 3 (a 7- V
Sample Mixed, Then:
Aliquot Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
4th-6th impingers,
U-connectors D-F
After Rinses
For HC1, C12
/ 025
/ 027
'/oj.o
/T7.
and HF
Computations
For Chloride
After Aliquots
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Components Rinsed**
022
/ 023
Filter
Description and Color:
iisea
nozzle, probe liner, bypass,
filter holder front
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) 3 (oY'Y> w/Acetone Rinses
Net Acetone Sample Wt. (g) I C(S'. ^
Sample Bottle Final Wt. (g) vt/add
-------
FILE NAME - phcll
RUN tt - M5PCLKN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gac Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 ) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F ) =
Average Delta H (in H20 )-
Average Delta P (in H20 ) =
Average Stack Temperature (F )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20 )=
% Isokinetic^
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis Ml (Inches)=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:50:43
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf )=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
202 .080
286.871
1 .016
86.148
82.567
29.30
-0 .12
17 .8
1 .1
80 .8
4 .4
30
0.87
0.081
436
28.89
28.41
0.2640
78 .3
0.82
175 .0
0.418
68.0
68 .0
32.11
1 ,146
36,805
21,243
20,307
0.0496
0.0092
0.0051
1 .61
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CC
0.0405 0.1009
A 180
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - phcll
RUN » - M5PCLKN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Voluirur (Cubic Meters ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters ) =
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg ) =
Static Pressure (mm H20 ) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide-
Moisture Collected (ml) =
Percent Water=
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Temperature (C ) =
H (mm H20 )=
P (mm H20) =
Temperature (C )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight^
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Root of Delta P (mm H20 )=
Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes )-
Nozzle Diameter (mm ) =
Stack Axis ttl (Meters)=
Stack Axis tt2 (Meters)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min):
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min):
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weight (g )=
Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )-
No Back Half Analysis
5.722
8.123
1 .016
2.439
2 .338
744
17 .8
1 .1
80.8
4 .4
27
22 .0
2 .1
224
28.89
28 .41
1.3306
78.3
0.82
175.0
10.62
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
349
1 ,042
602
575
0.0496
21 .2
11 .7
0 .73
PROG.-VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:50:44
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CC
92.8 231.3
A 181
-------
FILE NAME - phcll
RUN tf - M5PCLKN1
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-09-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 09:50:45
Point tt
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(in. H20)
0 .035
0.065
0.130
0.160
0 .115
0 .001
0.020
0 .030
0 .080
0.150
0.005
0 .025
0.050
0 .080
0 .170
0 .130
0 .145
0 .100
0 .060
0 .040
0 .130
0.140
0 .100
0 .040
0 .020
"Delta H
(in
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
. H20 )
.37
.70
.40
.73
.25
.10
.10
.32
.87
.63
.05
.27
.53
.86
.80
.40
.55
.08
.65
.43
.40
.54
.04
.40
.20
Stack
(F)
432
430
432
432
433
420
422
429
435
438
428
430
436
439
441
439
440
444
445
443
437
441
443
442
438
T Meter T
In(F)
75
75
75
79
83
79
80
81
82
86
78
78
79
81
85
81
82
86
88
88
83
86
88
89
87
Out( F
74
75
76
75
76
78
78
78
79
80
77
77
77
78
79
80
79
80
81
81
82
82
82
82
82
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .0962
Ut. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
1 .0916
Blank Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0002
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0 .0044
Final Wt. Tare Wt.
(g) (g)
Vol .
(ml)
230.0
0.0
Net Wt.
(g)
0.0452
0.0000
PROBE RINSE . 91.8015 91.7563
IMPINGERS 0.0000 0.0000
Probe Rinse Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0001
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0060 35.0000
0.0050 35.0000
0.0020 105.0000
A 182
-------
-R-
(J
Ul
CO
tr
tu
is
Ul
u
CO
N
co
jjj
CO
O
o
O1
Vl
t;
s
fSJ
ac
£
Ul
so
Al
V,
-,
Al
\
u
UJ
t •>«
Al
o
o
Oo
tt
fc
3 &
? 3 3
= U. —I '
A 183
-------
d* '•
P
n
s
CO
ro
IS-
cpCO CO
to
d. "dW3I
380W
CO
CO
\r>
^
J. "dWU XOfl
JUNVS
>0
en
n
t*7
en
ro
CO
CO co
§9
d. "dwai
tSSNUWI
£2
rip
VI
fc
fc
cO
1
"OVA dWfld
00
o
PQ
2TH2Q
;!
00(> Cro
-^Vfca
e
VS
c-
?g
^te
s
crd
CM
^I^H
en
JT
O
«o
to
D-^
URE
L
IFICE PRESS
DIFFERENTIA
(AH), In HtO
C-
U^
dodo
9^
s
o
O
8
Soo-\tJ
CO
«
O
rO
co
co
c\)
to-i'
|*£j
0
o
01
o
o
<3^
CO
8
6
0
r
O
d
a
6
O
O
o
C
CO
dlo
0
s
Is
II
vc|o
I1?
cr
ix=o-
8
o-
8
^S
00
n
^
V?
cv
r>
tx cv
CO
V
e&
t>«
0"
rO
oo
t
u
?^
r r
Vo
(0
M
w
cicJ
o
ro
f2
Cr
?
ts
»o\0
toco
^8
V
C*7 ro
fO
CO
UUl
«\;n
^•^o
COM
A 184
-------
EC
O
CO
LU
O
g
O
CO
oc
g
o
LU
O
co 35 2
co ** <*
5 - ~
< UJ LU
ZOO
co
_
UJ
0)
i i
cr 3c
UJ CJ>
5
LU LU
— o
l
I
O
CO
LU
< LU I— CD
II
CO
10 Lo
AJ ^v
5> CM
s °
s
Q.
CD CD CD
8 E E
< -2^
co
A VI
CM
O
O
co
E
O
A 185
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HCl, Cl2 , AND HF TRAIN (MM5PH)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. ..Z Sampling Train No. r n " (
Set up person (s) :__5__
Transfer to Sampler:
Sample Box No.
Date //- 9~
I fS*l
Relinquished By ,T,
Sample Box Leak Check :
Received By
cfm
_in. Hg vacuui
Date/Time I I- ) o -
7/r
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Quartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front
Filter Holder Back
Short 90° Connector
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinger (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinger (Mod-GBS)
Impinger Outlet Connector
Filter Type:
Whatman QM-A
Filter I.D.No.:
10
Initial Weights
(grams)**
Empty Loaded
50 mLs
0.1 N H2S04
100 mLs
0.1 N H2SO4
100 mLs
0.1 N H2SO4
Empty
100 mLs
0.1 N NaOH
100 mLs
0.1 N NaOH
~200 g indicating
silica gel
477.7
. L
777-.
* Nozzle openings covered with parafilm, and nozzle placed in ziplock bag before and
after sampling. Probe liner outlet sealed with glass female blank-off, and probe
liner inlet sealed with Teflon tape and Swagelok cap before and after sampling.
Sample box inlet covered (not sealed) with aluminum foil before and after sampling.
** Initial weights of additional components exchanged during the run also entered here.
All exchange component openings covered with parafilm.
Component Changes After Setup And Before Recovery And Other Comments:
A 186
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HCl, Cl2 , AND HF TRAIN (MM5PH)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. rCL Sampling Train No. Y ' ' ~ ' Sample Box No. O / /^> IS^
TRAIN PURGE WITH ASCARITE-FILTERED AIR
Condensation in front-half? Purged By
Date/Start Time Stop Time Purge Rate: (delta H = )
Transfer for Recovery: Moisture Removed?
Relincruished Bv
Sample box recovery person
Probe recovery person (s) :
Impinger: 1st
Final Wt. (q) JT77--3
Initial wt.(a) .^-?y,f
Net Wt. (a) y=2-V
Received Bv / ^7^ C- Date /Time }l '/<>-?>
(s) • CT /??_ £_— __ S T J"'-!- Date
' Date
BACK HALF RECOVERY
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
ffOL-1 ^Slrl. ( ?7o. ¥ v^TTlx S tTf7.3
^"77-i6 J~?/-6 ybC,.j(* JjSZ.O S~ft./
AJ.3 /O.I ?.^j^V^ ,J ^.^
[ Total Condensate Collected (cj) : tyofc.
/J~Do
y/_y0_y_j
7th
795X3
777-f
n.r
5" /4S,f
]
Description
and color:
Sample Number: ,3.024^ o2026
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) .^fL. (a y b2. (a Before Rinses
Components Rinsed*: filter support, 4th-6th impingers,
filter holder back, short 90° connector, U-connectors D-F
lst-3rd impingers, U-connectors A-C
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) ^ffi ^ .^"o2A ^ After Rinses
Net Sample Wt. (g) ^Pl >0 ^3 For HCl, C12 , and HF
Sample Mixed, Then: Computations
Aliquot Sample Number: »>»»»» ^2 025 »»»>»» ^027 For Chloride
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. (g) JJ.O *??.£
Sample Bottle Final Wt. (g) -$3&.L 3/1 .g */f7,f f^Oj-f After Aliquots
Net Sample Wt. (g) ^2 6f > I 1/2.3 /S7.\ /o3.3
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number: p? 022 o2 023
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g) f)3.3^ Filter
Components Rinsed**: nozzle, probe liner, bypass. Description and Color:
filter holder front
Sample Bottle Gross Wt. (g) 3t. J?,f w/Acetone Rinses ^
Net Acetone Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g) w/added Water Rinses
Net Water Sample Wt.(g) /3.Z.L
* ASTM Type I water rinses (2X). Thoroughly mix sample and rinses before aliquoting.
** Acetone rinses with brushing (3X or more) until clean. If any residue remains, follow
with ASTM Type I water rinses with brushing.
COMMENTS:
A 1
-------
RUN # - M5HCLKN2
LQCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 287.300
Final Meter Volume (CQbic "Feet )= 394.783
Meter Factor= 1.016
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )= 109.203
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )= 104.337
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.26
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= -0.12
03-07-1994 10:11:07
Leak Correction= 0.0000
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average
Average
Meter Temperature ( F )=
Delta
H
P
(in H20 )=
( in H20 )=
Average Delta P ( in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F ) =
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Weight=
Weight=
Root of Delta P (in H20 ) =
18.8
1 .8
105.9
4.6
82
1 .31
0.076
431
29 .04
28.54
0.2610
100.8
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches ) =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches ) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)-
Particulate Loading - Front Half.
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weighing )=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.82
175.0
0.417
68.0
68.0
32.11
1 ,128
36.23O
20,994
20,036
0.0473
0.0070
0.0039
1 .20
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% CO:
0.0444 0.0465
A 188
-------
* * METRIC UNITS *
FILE NAME - phcl2
RUN # - M5HCLKN2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT tt - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters ) =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (.Cubic Meters ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 ) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide--
Moisture Collected ( ml)=
Percent Water^
Average Meter Temperature (C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20 )=
Average Delta P (mm H20 ) =
Average Stack Temperature (C )-
Dry Molecular Weight^
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 ) =
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes ) =
Nozzle Diameter ( mm ) =
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis «2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 10:11:09
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min )=
m/min )=
, Cubic m/min )-
, Cubic m/min )=
Particulate Loading)..- Front Half
••£&. '
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )-
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m ) =
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
8 .135
11 .179
1 .016
3 .092
2.954
743
18.8
1.8
105.9
4.6
28
33.4
1 .9
222
29.04
28.54
1 .3154
100.8
0.82
175.0
10.59
1 .727
1 .727
2.983
344
1 ,026
594
567
0.0473
16.0
8.8
0.54
Leak Correction^ 0.0000
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
101.9 106.7
No Back Half Analysis
A 189
-------
RUN tt - M5HCLKN2
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 10:11:10
Point
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(in. H20)
0 .015
0.025
0 .065
0 .100
0.100
0 .025
0.055
0.130
0 .165
0.120
0 .015
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.135
0.115
0.110
0.080
0.040
0 .030
0.125
0.130
0.095
0.075
0 .040
"Delta H
(in. H20 )
0.28
0.43
1 .10
1 .70
1 .75
0.44
0.98
2.26
2.90
2.10
0.26
0.35
0.52
0.87
2.35
2.00
1 .90
1 .40
0.69
0.52
2.16
2.25
1 .65
1 .31
0.70
Stack
(F)
390
390
410
433
439
420
429
437
437
440
422
422
431
433
436
430
439
445
440
439
443 '
442
443
442
439
T
In(F
76
76
77
81
81
81
82
85
89
89
80
79
80
83
86
80
83
87
89
89
85
88
92
94
95
Meter T
) Out(F)
75
75
75
76
76
78
78
79
80
81
79
78
79
79
80
80
80
80
81
82
83
84
84
85
86
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Blank.
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .1240
Final
(g)
88.5456
• 0.0000
..( mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
1 .1171
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
88.5050
0.0000
0.0001
Blank
(g)
0.0000
0.0002
Vol .
(ml)
177.0
0.0
Wt
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0067
Net Wt
(g)
0.0406
0.0000
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate (cfm ) Time (min)
0.0070 70.0000
0.0100 105.0000
A 190
-------
Al
z
u
1
fe
N
CO
£
A 191
\
K
c-
£>
T"
Al
EN
=
DIFFERENC
-------
ll
d. '\jwai xofl
7UMVS
3
E
00
i
d. "dlHi
H3ribl
aaoiu
d. "JW31
H39NUNI
"OVA dMfU
Cr
UJ
Is!
••i ^ ^
^2«
PR
|s£
o
3 *
g O
£ o
s •=>
i
c\
c-
CO
8
»
0=59-
PI
cO
to
v>
cr cr
^U
§2o
C
oo
t>«e-
O
c-.^
OO
1<)C^
ct3
O
joS2
rfl
?
<36
Oo
CH^
In
dc
*WoS
O
£
O
OO
c3dt»
o
oio
O
\
r
oO
t
io«r
K
c-
«0
rO^
o
CE
s^
oo
ev
60
to
0
CO
?«
s
fcl
to
OofcV=
Ig52
o
Qffe
3-3-
o
d
C
Ch
{*(>
tojo
o-
CO
U
f
u
^t£
V: *•"-
O
w"
0%
Oo
8
OVoO
oo
^fcS
^^
t«fe
60
tfe
O
s;o
M fO
V
o
o
^Ol
t
4-
a
c
3
t
*^
A 192
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HCl, C12 , AND HP TRAIN (MM5PH)
FIELD LABORATORY SETUP DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brick Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No. vjS
Set up person (s) ; 3. /Tit
Transfer to Sampler:
Sampling Train No.
Sample Box No. 0)2^ GQ3
Date li-to-fl
Relinquished By
Sample Box Leak Check:
Received By
cfm
_in.Hg vacuum
Date/Time // - /Q-
TRAIN COMPONENT
COMPONENT NO.
LOADING DATA
Sampling Nozzle (Ouartz)
Probe (Liner-Glass)
Female Probe Blank-off
90° Bypass
Filter Holder Front — ~~
Filter Holder Back _ — • —
* Initial Weights
* (grams)**
Empty Loaded
* Filter Type:
Whatman OM-A
Filter I.D.No. :
Short 90° Connector A f~ ^
1st Impinger
(Short-stem Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (A)
2nd Impinqer (GBS)
U-Connector (B)
3rd Impinqer (GBS)
U-Connector (C)
4th Impincrer (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (D)
5th Impinaer (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (E)
6th Impinqer (Mod-GBS)
U-Connector (F)
7th Impinqer (Mod-GBS)
Impinaer Outlet Connector
50 mLs (01 '& C)S)I,0
0.1 N H,SOf
100 mLs 973. 2_ S~?l-3-
0.1 N H,SO,,
100 mLs V7/7-C> •S7'?. y
0.1 N HjS04
Empty 7/7^J. 1
100 mLs /•S't-b ^5^-S^a-Co
0.1 N NaOH
-------
MODIFIED METHODS 5/26A/0050 - PARTICULATES, HC1, C12 , AND HF TRAIN (MM5PH)
FIELD LABORATORY SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05
Client/Source: Belden Brj.ck Company
Source Location: Sugar Creek, Ohio
Sampling Location: Kiln Stack No. 3
Run No.
3
Sampling Train No.
- 2-
Sample Box No. Q/JLOQ3
TRAIN PURGE WITH ASCARITB-FILTERED AIR
Condensation in front-half?
Date/Start Time
Transfer for Recovery:
Relinquished By
Sample box recovery person(s):
Probe recovery person(s):
Stop Time
Moisture Removed?
Purged By
Purge Rate: (delta H
Received By
Date/Time //-/o-f3
Date
Date
— j> -*?3
BACK HALF RECOVERY
Impinger:
Ist
Final Wt.
Initial Wt.
Net Wt,
(g)
(g)
(g)
2nd
(of7.9
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
^77 -
7.
11.1
[ Total Condensate Collected (g)
Description
and color:
Impingers:
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
JT7J
1-3
,3 024
Components Rinsed*: filter support,
filter holder back, short 90° connector,
lst-3rd impingers, U-connectors_A-C
Sample Bottle Gross Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
Sample Mixed, Then:
Aliquot Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt.(g)
Sample Bottle Final Wt.(g)
Net Sample Wt.(g)
~^ Before Rinses
4th-6th impingers,
U-connectors D-F
After Rinses
For HC1, C12
3025
^027
Tl.l*
f7.
and HF
Computations
For Chloride
Aliquots
FRONT HALF RECOVERY
Sample Number:
Sample Bottle Tare Wt. (g)
Components Rinsed**
^023
nozzle, probe liner, bypass,
filter holder front
Sample Bottle Gross Wt . (g) 3^ '*f w/Acetone Rinses
Net Acetone Sample Wt . (g) _
Sample Bottle Final Wt . (g) w/added Water Rinses
Net Water Sample Wt. (g) / 3 7> 7~
Filter
Description and Color:
* ASTM Type I water rinses (2X). Thoroughly mix sample and rinses before aliquoting.
** Acetone rinses with brushing (3X or more) until clean. If any residue remains, follow
with ASTM Type I water rinses with brushing.
COMMENTS:
|j"pM rA JL v7 i
-------
R\JN * - M5HCLKN3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic"Feet )=
Meter Factor^
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
03-07-1994 10:49'-59
395.400
499.517
1 .016
0.006
105.783
100.101
29.26
-0.12
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Ulater =
18.0
2.0
105.1
4.7
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H ( in H20)=
P (in H20) =
Temperature
Weight=
Weight=
(F
(F
)=
)=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
87
1 .25
0.072
44O
29.04
28.52
0.2526
100.5
.Pitot Coefficient^
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 ( Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, wet, Cubic ft/min)
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
"
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
Weigh^(g)=
Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t )=
Emission Rate ( Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
0.82
175.0
0.417
68.0
68.0
32.11
1,097
35,241
20,222
19,269
0.0600
0.0092
0.0050
1.52
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0431 0.0554
A 195
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - PHCL3
RUN tt - M5HCLKN3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor^
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide-
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
11 .196
14.144
1 .016
O.OO02
2.995
2.834
743
~ "^
18.0
2.0
105.1
4.7
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 10:50:00
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Dry Molecular
Wet Molecular
Temperature
H (mm H20)=
P ( mm H20)=
Temperature
Weight^
Weight=
(C)=
(C)=
Average Square
% Isokinetic=:
Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
31
31 .8
1 .8
226
29 .04
28 .52
1 .2729
100.5
Pitot Coefficient^ 0.82
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 175.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm )= 1O.59
Stack Axis ttl (Meters )= 1.727
Stack Axis 82 (Meters )= 1.727
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 2.983
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 335
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic ro/min)= 998
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 573
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 546
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0600
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m)= 21.2
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m)= 11.6
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.69
No Back Half Analysis
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% CC
98.7 126.9
A 196
-------
FILE NAME - PHCL3
RUN # - M5HCLKN3
LOCATION - KILN
DATE - 11-10-93
PROJECT » - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
03-07-1994 10:50:01
oint ft
1
O.
»L.
o
4
j
6
-7
/
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.125
0.130
0.110
0 .055
0 .040
0 .'110
0.120
0.090
0.040
0 .030
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.060
0.130
0.025
0.070
0.110
0.150
0.070
0.010
0.030
0 .050
0.1OO
0.1OO
"Delta H
(in. H20 )
2.14
2.25
2.00
0 .90
0.65
1 .90
- 2.05
1 .57
0.70
0.50
0.17
0.18
0.35
1 .05
2.26
0.43
1 .23
1 .95
2.65
1 .25
0.15
0.54
0.88
1 .75
1 .77
Stack
(F)
442
443
444
439
439
433
441
440
442
441
433
436
441
446
448
439
437
443
442
442
439
416
439
441
444
T
In(F
73
81
88
86
87
84
89
93
94
92
86
86
87
89
93
88
89
93
97
99
91
90
91
91
99
Meter T
) Out(F)
78
78
79
81
81
81
82
83
84
84
85
85
85
86
87
87
87
88
87
89
88
88
88
88
88
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Probe Rinse
Blan
Impinger Blank (ro€l/ml)= 0.0000
Final
(g)
0.0000
1 .0873
Final
(g)
,110.8962
44 o.oooo
fel£mg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
1 .0844
Wt . Tare Wt
(g)
110.8388
0.0000
0.0007
. Blank Wt.
(g)
0.0000
0.0002
Vol .
(ml)
189.0 0
0.0 0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0027
Net Wt
(g)
.0573
.0000
A 197
-------
A 198
-------
A.3 DRYER FIELD DATA FORMS
A 199
-------
A 200
-------
A.3.1 Dryer Organic Gases
A 201
-------
A 202
-------
RUN 1 DryW
Time
1035
1036
1037
1038
1030
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049,
1050
"- 1051
105S3
1053s
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
RUN2 Dryer RUN3 Dryer
THC
(ppm)
64.6
66.0
67.1
68.1
67.7
67.6
68.1
68.7
€8.6
68.8
69.5
70.6
71.0
71.4
71.5
72.7
73.8
75.2
74.3
7^515
72.1
71.1
70.3
68.9
67.1
67.5
66.7
65.6
64.6
64.7
64.0
63.4
63.0
62.7
61.8
62.7
61.4
60.6
60.0
59.7
59.3
59.5
Time
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
v 1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
THC
(ppm)
84.3
84.9
85.2
85.2
86.8
86.5
86.2
84.8
.85.1
85.3
84.1
84.5
84.3
85.0
85.7
86.1
' 84.7
84.8
84.2
84.4
84.7
85.0
84.2
' 86.5
86.4
85.4
85.4
85.5
84.7
86.4
87.3
86.6
85.8
84.3
86.5
86.7
83.3
78.8
80.6
85.7
78.3
66.6
Time
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1657
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
THC
(ppm)
89.1
89.6
89.8
89.2
90.8
91.4
68.8
87.9
88.6
89.9
90.3
91.4
90.4
89.8
89.1
90.8
92.4
90.6
89.1
87.7
88.8
88.4
88.7
88.9
88.4
88.1
89.3
89.2
88.9
88.9
88.8
89.7
90.8
91.2
91.5
91.6
91.4
90.8
90.8
91.2
91.0
89.6
A 203
-------
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1200
1201
59.1
59.4
59.5
59.4
59.1
59.1
58.7
58.7
58.4
57.9
55.6
54.4
55.6
47.4
49.4
75.7
86.8
84.1
85.0
91.5
94.1
95.0
95.3
94.8
94.2
93.8
92.6
94.9
952
93.9
93.8
942
93.7
93.0
932
SI6
0&9
942
93.4
93.4
93.5
92.7
942
94.1
95.1
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404 N
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
63.6
67.9
73.8
75.5
82.5
86.1
85.3
86.3
89.0
89.2
ft 89.0
v 88.4
87.3
87.9
88.4
89.3
88.9
89.8
88.9
87.9
86.4
85.5
86.1
86.9
85.8
85.6
85.7
85.1
85.5
86.1
862
852
84.6
852
86.3
85.3
84.6
84.3
84.7
85.1
86.3
85.8
84,7
84.7
86.6
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
16g0
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1631
1632
1633,
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1648
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
90.8
- r
91.4
66.8
61.3
7^4
86.1
84.9
90.4
91.6
92.6
92.§
VM««T
92.6
93.5
93.5
93.6
93.9
93.8
94.2
94.5
94.8
94,1 ,
94.0
94.0
93.0
"93.2
93.7
93.5
93.4
93.5
93.3
93.7
93.4
93.7
93,3
922
93.1
93.7
932
94.0
93.9
94.5
93.8
932
93.1
93.3
A 204
-------
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
Average
Minimum
Maximum
95.1
96.5
96.8
96.5
96.8
97.1
97.4
97.0
95.9
94.3
95.0
95.7
96.4
94.9
95.8
97.2
96.6
95.0
95.9
96.2
95.3
95.6
96.7
96.6
95.7
95.9
95.8
95.8
96.0
95.0
94.2
94.3
94.0
94.0
94.0
*•*
ate
47.4
97.4
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
86.3
87.9
89.2
88.8
86.8
87.2
88.8
88.5
89.0
89.9
88.6
88.8
88.6
87.4
87.1
86.8
87.3
88.4
88.2
87.0
87.1
87.2
88.9
87.4
87.1
86.6
87.4
88.4
89.7
89.0
88.7
88.8
87.6
87.8
85.6
63.8
89.9
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
94.6
95.3
94.9
95.5
94.6
94.9
94.9
95.0
95.4
94.9
94.9
95.5
95.1
95.5
96.1
95.5
95.0
94.8
94.1
94.3
94.8
96.1
96.6
95.9
95.3
95.4
96.6
96.4
95.8
96.0
95.1
94.3
96.0
96.5
91.9
61.3
96.6
A 205
-------
Concentration of Methane and Ethane
determined by GC/FID in Dryer Stack Emissions November 11, 1993
TIME
1122
1133
1136
1138
1219
1225
1316
1319
1322
1358
1402
1405
1445
1448
1713
CONCENTRATION (ppmv)
METHANE
104
123
116
120
141
117
77
116
71
117
80
80
98
86
106
ETHANE
8.1
9.1
8.1
8.8
11
10
6.5
9.2
5.2
9.2
6.1
3 .9
7.0
6.5
7.6
A 206
-------
RUN * - DRYERV1
LOCATION - dryer
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
02-13-1995 13:54:16
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.13
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )= 0.00
Percent Oxygen= 17.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide^ 2.2
Percent Water= 4.2
Average Delta P (in H20 )= 0.655
Average Stack Temperature (F )= 100
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight= 28.59
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.8060
Pitot Coefficient^ 0.84
Stack Axis #1 ( Inches )= 57.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)- 57.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )= 17.72
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,847
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 50,449
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 46,325
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 44,361
* * METRIC UNITS * *
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen^
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (C)-
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight*
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
Pitot Coefficient=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min)=
m/min)=
Cubic m/min)=
Cubic m/min)=
740
0
17.6
2.2
4.2
16.6
38
29.06
28.59
4.0619
0.84
1 .448
1.448
1 .646
868
1,429
1,312
1,256
-A 207
-------
KUIN ff - UKYERV1
LOCATION - dryer
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point # Delta P Stack T
(in. H20) (F)
1 0.750 98
2 0.710 100
3 0.740 101
4 0.770 101
5 0.750 101
6 0.520 96
7 0.600 99
8 0.660 100
9 O.690 100
10 0.680 101
11 0.620 100
12 0.370 10O
02-13-1995 13=54:17
I-A 208
-------
l-ILfc NAME ~ DRYVEL2
RUN # - dryerv2
LOCATION - dryer
DATE ~ 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
02-13-1995 13:48:28
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )= 29.13
Static Pressure (Inches H20)« 0.00
Percent Oxygen= 17.6
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.2
Percent Water= 4.2
Average Delta P (in H20)= 0.618
Average Stack Temperature (F)= 100
Dry Molecular Weight* 29.06
Wet Molecular Weight* 28.59
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)= 0.7719
Pitot Coefficient* 0.84
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)- 57.0
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)= 57.0
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 17.72
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)= 2,726
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)= 48,314
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)= 44,370
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 42,490
* * METRIC UNITS * *
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen*
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (C)=
Dry Molecular Weight-
Wet Molecular Weight*
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20>
Pitot Coefficient*
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)«
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
740
0
17.6
2.2
4.2
15.7
38
29.06
28.59
3.8902
0.84
1.448
1 .448
1.646
831
1 ,368
1,256
1,203
I-A 209
-------
LOCATION - dryer
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point # Delta P Stack T
(in. H20) (F)
1 0.780 98
2 0.760 100
3 0.780 101
4 0.840 101
5 0.720 101
6 0.420 96
7 0.710 99
8 0.740 100
9 0.690 100
10 0.490 101
11 0.320 100
12 0.170 99
02-13-1995 13:48:29
I-A 210
-------
RUN tf - dryervS
LOCATION - dryer
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
02-13-1995 13:58:05
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Delta P ( in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature (F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
Pitot Coefficient=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)=
Stack Axis #2 ( Inches )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min)=
ft/min)=
Cubic ft/min>
Cubic ft/min)=
* * METRIC UNITS
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Delta P ( mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
Pitot Coefficients
Stack Axis #1 ( Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 ( Meters )=
Circular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
29.13
0.00
17.6
2.2
4.2
0.642
100
29.06
28.59
0.7910
0.84
57.0
57.0
17.72
2,794
49,502
45,476
43,548
740
0
17.6
2.2
4.2
16.3
38
29.06
28.59
3.9866
0.84
1.448
1.448
1.646
851
1,402
1,288
1,233
I-A 211
-------
LOCATION - dryer
DATE - 11-11-93
PROJECT # - 4601.01.05.01
Point # Delta P Stack T
(in. H20) (F)
1 0.820 99
2 0.740 100
3 0.740 100
4 0.810 100
5 0.750 99
6 0.440 98
7 0.720 100
8 0.760 100
9 0.720 100
10 0.580 100
11 0.380 99
12 0.240 99
U^-13-1995 13:58:06
I-A 212
-------
Project No.
Run No. _2
Plant
TRAVERSE DATA
Date ll/n fax
Sampling Location
Operator(s)
a.*.
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Site to Barometer Elevation
Corrected Barometric Pressure
Pilot No. Pilot Cp L.
T/C No. Temp. Meter No.
Stack Area, sq.ft.
Static Pressure, in. H2O
Assumed Moisture, %
Assumed %CO2
Initial Pitol Leak Check
Final Pilot Leak Check
Comments:
ft.
:~3
Assumed %O
Traverse Point Layout
Start Time /n/&
End Time
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
£V
&
£2
EV
B3?
eC
SI
st
-55-
sy
5^
^C
VELOCITY
HEAD. 4P
in. H20
d.if
o.ni
G.M
0.11
0.9^
o.gz
&&?,($
(Ut.ti
J&r^.£
Q~4ft&
0&
0.51?
STACK
TEMP,
•F
ROTATION
ANGLE
a
•
-
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
VELOCITY
HEAD, ip
in. H20
STACK
TEMP.
°F
ROTATION
ANGLE
a
93-3 SEV sutlrm 020393
A 213
-------
Project No.
Run No.
Plant
VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA
Date
Sampling Location
Operator(s)
4-
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Site to Barometer Elevation
Corrected Barometric Pressure
Pitot No. Ai 6 Pitot Cp !
T/C No. qfr~)0 Temp. Meter No.
Stack Area, sq.ft.
Static Pressure, in. H20
Assumed Moisture, %
Assumed %CO2
ft.
'IE
Assumed %O2
Initial Pitot Leak Check
Final Pitot Leak Check
Comments:
Start Time
Traverse Point Layout
End Time
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
^ /
e
3
Lf
, J
/
I?
VELOCITY
HEAD. Ap
in. H20
aye
0.16
o.n r
o,p«/
0.7^
0.^/2
STACK
TEMP.
"F
^
/on
/Of
/Ol
/Ol
9^
ROTATION
ANGLE
a
-
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
N /
^
3
U
r
^
VELOCITY
HEAD. Ap
in. H20
a1?/
QW
o.tf?
6.*y
n,3^
0, /9
STACK
TEMP.
°F
f9
/oo
100
(Of
/oo
?1
ROTATION
ANGLE
a
A 214
93-3 SB/ sur Irm 020393
-------
Project No.
Run No.
Plant
VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA
#3 Date
Sampling Location
Operator(s)
Dryer
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Site to Barometer Elevation —
Corrected Barometric Pressure —~
Pitot No. A1 5" Pitot Cp
T/C No. £)£"- 10 Temp. Meter No.
Stack Area, sq.ft.
Static Pressure, in. H2O
Assumed Moisture, %
Assumed %CO2
ft.
Assumed %O2
Initial Pitot Leak Check
Final Pitot Leak Check
Comments:
Start Time
Traverse Point Layout
End Time
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
£ 1
^
3
-------
DRYER—TOTAL HYDROCARBON
Calibration Error Check
Cal. gas value
90.20
51.3
29.5
0
Measured value
90.2
50.8
29.1
0
% Error
0
1.0
1.4
0
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Bias Check
Cal. gas value Measured value % Error Pass/Fail
51.3 51.1 0.4 Pass
Percent Drift
Initial
Final
% Error
Pass/Fail
Run 1
Span
Zero
90.20
0
91.32
0.6
1.2
0.7
Pass
Pass
Run 2
Span
Zero
91.32
0.6
91.12
0.4
0.2
0.2
Pass
Pass
Run 3
Span
Zero
91.12
0.4
91.24
0.8
0.1
0.4
Pass
Pass
MRI-MVZ4601-01.TBL
216
-------
\J
-^ -i 2 Z
co S S .. S 2
co ** •* co -* ^r
>- 2 2 CO 2 2
^3- ^~ "~" """
2 S S 0 LU O 0
1
\
> C)
1
(
fe
SI
~T~ r^-
is c
t-'- .
*: \
i
r
< l < ' H
LU LU W LU LU ^
H- £ |Z £ ^ £ £
< S5 ^ Hi 3 S t
LT CC S 5: CC S CU
Jir O CQ cu O CQ D.
v^*
>- 1
CQ
UJ
O
g
Q
S ^
CQ >^
DC <
<:
0
Q
fo
^
•<
-^
< 0
Z Z LU
S i s
s
S o
S
i
9
vo
vs
\r
a
^r
«
^
4
1
-c
_^
x
i
\«
t>
H^
J
^
\0
^
t
^
Q/
E _, ^.
N
k
*)
Cs
2
o
Q
-T
^
V
s
o\
~t
t
i
g o o
3 ^ a
0 ^ cS
i ^ u7
D. — n
2 0 s F ^ CC
•_ Z < co F— o
0 LU CO CO LU J-:
1 1 1 _J l_ ^_ «J ^.
=J 0. 5 13 CL CC
O s ^ <: S LU
CC oO
T- CM CO
o .
o
QoO
Odd
f— CM CO
o
<0
ooo
606
i- CM CO
CM
0
O
60
,
o
C^o
v.*-^
^
s
»>Q» Jxaio
6 6 o
CM (\j r\-»
-r- CM CO
^0
O
N1
l)o v*5>ti°
8 w S)
T- CM CO
6^
R
(>o tVs cV>
0 D Q
tu N CJ
i- CM CO
— 1
<:
§ §
i $
CJ i<
Sis
£2 2 |
1- 0 <
LU Z LU
S. Q CC
C\JLU cf ^
> V5
>^ >?
JO -Q
^p *^p
£;£ ±
•3
sS -~S
cr* o^»
to to
co ^ ~t
£ OJ «^
5 ° -^
CD "£
I °
0.
CD CD Q?
£•? E E O—
< 1-1 \C
00 0
&&
^0^0 ~>
a*- o^ ~~t
CO CM '
V)
^^ i
AVI \j
CM
,f
O ^
o —
^_
€
. fr ~
\K .
1 i
03 ^
1 ^
O UJ Vi. J ~^ ,
cc o ,o -f
wo
VJ
rx
^^"^
.
t/\
V)
0
A 217
-------
DATA LOGGER RECORDS
-:A 218
-------
Filename:RUN1
Naa-e : 8'JN1
Date: 11-11-19 93
Lo.: anon: 3ELOOM 3Si::<
Project ff:4601-01-05 -0 1
•;p-ir3Eor : 30
0
0
\ "
•j 7
-.) "
07
07
M 7
0
03
03
03
03
08
0
03
03
08
08
. c
: _.
: 5
: 5
:5
:S
. 5
: l
; 1
: 1
: 1
: 1
: 1
: 1
: 1
*-
..
^
^
2
2
T C
4
4
5
5
5
--i
3
i
5
0
i
•N
J
2
2
^ —
4
u
4
4
ji
.''?'•
. '? 0
. 9 o
. 9 0
~ -iliL—
' ft N T T -> V p Q ^>
1C
4
5
0
1
i
THC
6
6
7
7
(24
^^r
5
5
<;
(fNI
(57
46
6
43
^
7
7
7
7
T
•
1
.
50
•3?~> — • -C
TC:
.05
. 16
.Of
05 90.20
96
.9
00
.3
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE/
08
03
: i
: 1
8
o
43
f
50
00 V
.3
/Jie^Ji^
08 : 19 43 .00
03:19 50.8
THC PASSED AT so.a PPM--BG f
LINEARIT
03:20
03:20
03 :21
03:21
03:22
08:2 2
08:23
08 :23
THC- PASS
03 :24
03:24
08 :25
03 :25
03:26
03:26
03:27
0 3 : 2 7
Y CHECK(^9.5 PPM PROPANE^-BG
TO nc ^ -A
38.95 \
39.4 \
35 .23-
C^
ED^-#T''29 . ! PPM--BG [11-11-199
34.73
27. 7
25 .00
0.3
24.36
-0. L
24.84
-0 . 1
-- 03:19:09]
(11-11-1993 --
0.°-:19:44]
-- 03: 23:.59]
I-A 219
-------
ua :,>9
03 :29
08 :30
03:20
08 :3i
0 8 : 3 i
03:32
03:32
03:33
24.33
-0.2
24.31
-0.2
24.32
-0 .2
-' 4 . 3 0
-0.3
-0.2
c 6 . •) f
-13. o
10:23
10:23
10:29
10:29
10:30
10:30
10:31
10:31
10:32
10 :32
10 :33
10 : 33
10:34
10:34
10:35
JjO-; *5
BEGIN R1
-±•0 ! 36
10:36
10:37
10:37
10:38
1.0:38
10:39
10:39
L0:40
10:40
10:41
10:41
10:42
10:42
10:43
10:43
^•9 . 1 1
67.9
47.72
64.0
46 .35
61.6
46 . 32
60.1
46 .59
60 . 9
47. 15
62 .4
47.67
63 . 9
48.32
$ 5 ->
JN 1--BG
— ST3T32
67. 1
49.20
68 .2
49.57
69 .2
49.43
68 .3
49. 39
68 . 7
49.58
69 .2
49. 77
69 .8
49 . 76
69 .3
-11-1993 -- 10:35:56]
Or
0
-A
220
-------
10 :45
10 :^5
Us
50 .05
70 .6
mi
: -j i 9
i 0 49
i 0 f 0
'- CJ 5 U
10 51
1 u 5 l
s >
C -.
10
10 .
L M : 5 ;
10:52
L 0 : 5 4
10:56
10:55
10:55
10 :56
10 :56
10:57
10 :57
10:53
10 :53
10 :59
10 :59
1 1
i i
:00
00
11:01
11:01
11 :02
11:02
11:03
11:03
11:04
11:04
11 :05
11 :05
11:06
11 :06
11:07
11:07
11:03
11:03
11 :09
11:09
11:10
11:10
U : 11
52.07
76 .2
51.73
75 . <-
51 . 43
74.6
50 .98
73.2
50 .65
72.2
50 .35
71 .4
49 .36
70 .0
49 .20
63 .2
49 .35
68 .6
49 .08
67 .&
43 .63
66 . 7
43.33
65.3
43.35
65 .3
43.12
65 . 1
47.89
64 .5
47. 77
64 .2
47.64
63.8
47.34
63 .0
47.64
63.3
47.20
-A 221
-------
11 :12
11:13
11 :13
11:14
11:14
11:15
11:15
11:16
11:16
•1:1 ?
11:17
11:13
11:13
11:1?
11:1'?
1 1:20
11:20
11:21
11:21
11:22
11:22
11:23
11:23
11:24
11:24
11:25
11:25
11:26
11 :26
11 :27
11:27
11 :23
11 :23
11:29
11 :29
11 :30
11 :30
11 :31
11 :31
11 :32
11 :32
11:33
11 :33
11:34
11:34
1 1 :35
11:35
c - .
46 .63
61 .1
46 .60
60.9
46 . 45
60.5
+ S.S1
60 . ~?
46 . 37
60.2
•*6 . '*7
60 .5
•i 6 . 5 3
6 'J . 7
46.* 7
60 .5
46 .33
60 .3
46 .39
60 . 3
46 .22
59 .3
46.23
59.9
46. 14
59.6
45 .95
59 . 1
45 . 14
56 .8
44. 72
55 .6
45 . 14
56 .3
42 . 24
48 . 7
42 .92
50 .6
52.25
76 . 7
56 . 19
37 .3
55 .26
85 .2
55 .56
36.0
-A 222
-------
. . . w. /
11:37
11:38
11:44
11:44
11:45
1 I : 45
11 :46
11:46
11:47
11:47
1 I : i.3
1 1 :48
1 i • i O
11:4 9
11:50
11:50
11:51
11:51
11:52
11 :52
11:53
11 :53
11 :54
11 :54
11 :55
11 :55
11 :56
11:56
11:57
11:57
11:53
11:53
11 :59
11 :59
12 :00
12 :00
12 :01
12 :01
12 :02
12 :02
12 :03
12:03
12 :04
12:04
12:05
12:05
12 :06
53.79
95 . 1
59.11
59.03
.95.9
5 9 . L '
'J f-» "^
5 3 . •• 3
•? 4 . o
53 . 70
9 4 . ; j
53.31
9 5 . 1
5 -3 . a 2
y 4 . 6
53.41
94.0
53 . 46
94. 1
53.27
93 .6
53 . 72
94 .9
53 .34
95 .2
58 .53
94.4
53 .55
94.4
53 .57
94.5
53 . 23
93.6
53 .33
95.2
53 . 73
95 . 1
59. 14
96 . 1
59 . 15
96. 1
59.64
97.5
59.73
97.7
59.64
97 .5
59.75
I-A 223
-------
L2 :07
12 :03
12:08
12 :09
12:09
12:10
12:10
12:11
12:11
12: 12
12:12
iv; L?
' 2 • ' '
I J : 14
12:14
1 "> • ' "i
12 : 15
12:16
12:16
12:17
12:17
12 : 18
12:13
12:19
12 : 19
il • t 0
2:2§
12:23
12 :23
12:24
12 :24
12:25
12 :25
12:26
12:26
12:27
12 :27
12 : 28
12 :23
12 :29
12 :29
12 : 30
12 : 30
12 :31
12:31
12:32
98.0
59.97
98 .4
59.33
93 .0
5-'? . 44
96 . '?
53.37
95 . 3
5 '.' . 12
96.0
5 9 . 3 '+
96.6
59 .62
97.4
5 9 . 0 7
9 5 . 9
59.38
96.7
59.83
93 . 1
59.63
97.6
59.11
96 .0
IMl
59.31
96.5
59. 71
97.7
59.68
97.6
5 9 . ? 7
96.7
59 .42
96 .8
59.39
96 .8
59 .39
96 .3
59 .48
97.0
59.12
96 .0
53.82
-A 224
-------
12 :34
12 : 40
12 :40
1 2 : a i
' - • i
53.75
95 .0
12:46:0
12- : 46 : l
53.55
53.63
-- 12:37:39]
1 .
25 .
- i . O •
24.71
~» / '
- 4 . o o
24.64
24.61
24. 76
: 5 . 6 0
- 5 . 8 6
'12: 42: 5 FINAL ZERO
-------
FiIcnamc:PUN2
me :RUN2
13:11 55.59
13:11 34.0
BEGIN RUN 2--BG [11-11-1993 -
- 13:1
L 3
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13 :
13 :
13:
13 :
13 :
13 :
13 :
13 :
13 :
L 3 :
1 I :
13 :
L 3 :
: 12
• i •>
: ' 3
: 13
: 14
: 15
: 15
: 16
: 16
: 17
: 17
: 18
: 13
: 19
: 19
:20
: 21
: 21
; 2 2
22
23
23
24
25
25
26
26
2 1
2 7
55 .30
84.6
55.91
55.93
35 .0
56 .46
86 .5
56.39
36 .3
56 .23
36.0
55 . 78
84 .6
55 .83
34.9
55.94
85 .0
55 .55
33.9
55 .69
34.3
55.60
34 . L
55 .35
84.3
56 .09
35.4
56.25
35 .9
55.7 :>,
34.4
!-A 226
-------
ill:'?
13 :30
13 :30
13:31
13:31
13:32
13:32
13:33
13 : 33
13:34
1 3 : 3 4
13:35
13:35
13:36
1 3 : 3 o
i •> . -i : 7
13:3?
13:33
13:33
13:39
13:39
13:40
13:40
13:41
13:41
13:42
13 :42
13 :43
13 :43
13:44
13:44
13 :45
13:45
13 :46
13:46
13:47
13:47
13:43
13 :43
13:49
13 :49
13:50
13:50
13:51
13:51
13:52
13:52
13:53
13:53
13:54
13:54
]
-------
13:56
13 :56
13:57
13:57
13 :53
13:53
13 :59
13 :59
14:02
14:02
I 4 : 0 3
14:0;.
14:0 i
14:04
14 :05
14 :05
14 :06
14:06
14:07
14:07
14 :08
14:03
14:09
14:09
14:10
14: 10
14:11
14:11
14:12
14: 12
14: 13
14:13
14:14
14 : 14
14: 15
14: 15
14:16
14: 16
14:17
14:17
14:18
14 : 13
14:19
14:19
14 :20
14:20
14:21
14:21
14:22
i / • •> ->
52 .55
75 .4
54.98
82 .3
56 .23
35 .9
55.96
35 . 1
57.31
3 3 . '?
5 ~ . 24
? °. 7
57.02
38.1
56.64
87.0
56 .85
87.6
57.03
33 . 1
57.35
39.0
57.20
33 . 6
57.51
39 .5
57 .22
83 . 7
56 .86
87.7
56 .35
86 .2
56.01
35 .2
56.22
85 .a
56 .50
36 .6
56.14
85 .6
56 .05
85 .4
56 .09
35 .5
55.89
34.9
56 .04
35 .3
56 . 22
••> c o
!-A 228
-------
14:24
14:24
14:25
14:25
14:26
14:26
14:27
14:2?
14: 23
14:23
14:2 9
1 4 ; I1'?
1 4 : 2.0
14:3 0
55.91
35 .0
55 . 72
34.4
55.91.
35 .0
56.30
36.1
5 5 . '? i
2 5 . 0
55.72
•34.4
55.5'?
.34.0
14:3 2
14:32
14:33
14:33
14:34
14:34
14: 35
14:35
14:36
14:36
14:37
14:37
14:33
14:33
14:39
14:3'?
14:40
14:40
14:41
14:41
14:42
14 :42
14:43
14:43
14:44
14:44
14 :45
14 :45
14:46
14 :46
14:47
14:47
14:43
14:48
14:4 9
14:49
5 5 . A '1
34.9
56.31
36 . 1
56.13
35 .6
55 . 73
34.4
55 . 75
34 .5
56.40
86 . 3
56 .32
36 . 1
56.85
37.6
57.30
83 .9
57.19
38 .6
56 .49
86 .6
56 .60
36 .9
57. 16
88 .5
57.07
83 . 2
57.26
S3 .8
57.56
89 .6
57.10
88 . 3
57.19
88.6
I-A 229
-------
14:51
14:51
14:52
14:52
14:53
14:53
14 :54
L4 :54
t /, . C C
i 3 : 5 2
14:56
14:56
14:57
14:57
14 :53
14:53
L4:59
14:59
15 :00
15 :00
15:01
15:01
15 :02
15 :02
15 :03
15 :03
15 :04
15 :04
15 :05
15:05
15 :06
15 :06
15:07
15:07
15 :08
15 :08
15 :09
15 :09
15 : 10
15 : 10
15 : 11
15 : 11
15:12
15 : 12
15 : 13
15 : 13
15 : 14
15:14
15 : 15
15 : 15
15 : 16
15:16
1 ?. • 1 7
56 .70
87.2.
56 .58
86 .3
56 .47
36 .5
56.64
37.0
<; 7 ;1 S
5 3 S°.t
56 .96
3 7 . 9
56.55
86 .3
56.53
86.'?
56 .62
37.0
57.20
83 . 6
56.67
37.1
56.57
86 .3
56 .40
86 . 3
56.69
87.2
57.03
88 . 1
57.43
89 .4
57.25
88 . 7
57.14
38 . 4
57.18
S8 .6
56 . 74
37.3
56 .83
87.6
57.12
33 .4
56 .65
87 .0
57.00
83 .0
57.37
89 . 1
57.57
89 . 7
"-. i 1 ,-i
H-A 230
-------
. , . - J
15 : 19
15 : 19
15 :20
15 :20
15:21
15:21
15 :22
15:22
15:23
15:23
15:24
15:24
15:25
15:25
15:26
1 5 : 2 6
15:27
15:27
15 :23
15 :23
15 :29
15 :29
15 :3Q
15 : 30
15:31
15:31
15 :32
15:32
15 :33
15 :33
15 :34
15 :34
15 :35
15 :35
15:36
15 :36
15:37
15 :37
15 :38
15 :3S
15 :39
15:39
15 :40
15 : 4 0
15:41
15:41
15 :42
15 :42
15 :43
15 : 43
15:44
JJ . 1
56 . 74
37 .3
57.20
33 . 6
57.59
39 . 7
57.39
90 .6
57.77
90 .2
57.32
33.9
56 . 77
37.4
5 6 . 9 L
37 .3
57.23
33 .3
57.45
39 .3
57.53
39 .5
57.30
38 .9
57.33
90 .5
53 .09
91.1
57.17
83 .5
56 .35
87.6
57.10
38 .3
57.57
89 . 7
57 . 70
90 .0
53.07
91.1
57. 73
90 . 1
57.51
89 .5
57.27
83 .3
57.33
90 .5
53 . 44
92 . 1
57.30
-A 231
-------
j. 3 ; <* o
L5 :46
15:46
15 :47
15 :47
15 :43
15 :43
15 :49
15 :49
15 :50
15 :50
15 :51
15 :5 1
15:52
15:52
15 :53
15:53
15:54
15:54
15:55
15 :55
15 :56
15 :56
15:5?
15:57
15 :53
15 :53
L5 :59
15:59
16 :00
16 :00
16:01
16 :01
16:02
16 :02
16 :03
16 :03
16:04
16 :04
16 :05
16 :05
16 :06
16 :06
16:07
16:07
16 :08
16 :03
16 :09
16:09
16 : 10
16 : 10
16:11
16:11
oo.o
56.79
37.4
57.13
33.6
57.02
38 . 1
57.15
33.5
57.22
83 . 7
57.0.}
33.1
56.93
3 7 . :i
57 . J6
39.1
57.31
83.9
57.21
38.6
57.21
33.6
57.19
33 .6
57.49
39 .4
57.89
90.6
58 .03
90 .9
53 . 13
91.3
53 . 14
91.3
53 .09
91 . 1
57 .36
90 . 5
57.38
90 .5
58 .03
91.0
57.95
90 . 7
57.46
39.4
57.36
90 .5
58.10
91.2
49.51
66 . S
-A 232
-------
16 : 13
16 : 13
16:14
16 : 14
16 : 15
16 : 15
16:16
16 : L6
16: 17
16:17
16 : 13
1 6 : 1 a
16:19
16 : 19
16:20
16:21
16:21
16 :22
16:2 2
16:23
16 :23
16 :24
16:24
16:25
16:25
16:26
16 :26
16 :27
16:27
16:28
16:28
16:29
16 :29
16 :30
16:30
16:31
16:31
16 :32
16 :32
16:33
16 :33
16 : 34
16 :34
16 :35
16 :35
16 : 36
16 :36
16 : 37
16:37
16:38
16:33
51.46
72 .3
56.23
35 . 9
55 .33
34 . 7
57.74
9 0 . 1
53.16
91.3
5 3 . 4 0
92.3
53.43
92.2
53.49
53.31
93.2
53 . 32
93 .2
53.84
93 .3
53 .94
93 .5
53.93
93 .5
59 .06
93.9
59 .15
94. 1
59.26
94 . 4
59.01
93 . 7
58 .99
93 . 7
58 .93
93.6
53 . 64
92 . 7
58 . 70
92 .8
58 .33
93 .4
53.31
93 .2
53 . 77
93 . I
53.31
93 . 2
5u! . 75
93.0
-A 233
-------
16 :40
16 :40
16 : Al
16:41
L6 : 42
16:42
16:43
16 :43
16:44
L6 :44
L 6 : .i 5
16:45
16:46
16:46
16 : 47
16:47
16:43
16 : 43
16 : 49
16 :49
16 :50
16 :50
16:51
16:51
16 :52
16 :52
L6 :53
16:53
16 :54
16 :54
16 :55
16 :55
16 :56
16 :56
16:57
16:57
16 :53
16 :53
16 :59
16 :59
17:00
17:00
17:01
17:01
L7 :02
17:02
17 :03
17:03
17:04
17:04
17:05
17:05
53 .89
93 .4
53 .73
92 .9
53.37
91.9
53.63
92.8
5 3 . 3'J
93.4
5M . 70
92.8
5 3 . 9 a
93 . 7
53 .96
93 .6
59 . 15
94. 1
53 .92
93 .5
53 .70
92 .9
53.69
92.3
58 . 73
92 .9
59.20
94 .3
59 .44
95 .0
59 .29
94.5
59 .53
95 .2
59.21
94. 3
59.29
94.5
59.30
94 .6
59 .34
94. 7
59 .49
95 . 1
59 .29
94.5
59.30
94 .6
59.51
95.2
I-A 234
-------
17
17
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
:07
08
03
09
09
10
10
17:11
17.-U
L 7 : i 2
17:12
95 . 1
59.71
95.7
59.53
95 .2
59 .33
94 . 7
59 .23
94.5
5 0 .
17:13
17:13
17:14
1 " : 14
: 7 : 1 5
17:15
17:16
17: lb
17:17
17:17
17:18
17:13
17:19
17:19
17:20
17 :20
17:21
17:21
17:22
17:22
17:23
17:23
17:24
17:24
17:25
17:25
17:26
17:26
17:27
17:27
59.03
9 3 . 9
59.27
94.5
59.71
95 . 7
59.90
96 .3
59.65
95 .5
59.44
95 .0
59 . 43
95 . 1
59 .90
96 .3
59 .33
96 .0
59.63
95 .5
59.63
95 .6
59 .33
94 . 3
59 .08
93 .9
59.70
95.7
59 .87
96.^
11-1993 --
: 2 7 : i 9
235
-------
-10-19 9 j:
i-A 236
-------
'-7:12
39.34
29.5
39.36
17:13
rue PASSED AT 29.5
42.03
35.6
65.29
PPM--BG fli
L 0 - : o u i .
:o
16
65.47
9 0 . 3
/" : 1 9 65.60
7:19 91.1
7:20 65.59
7 : 2 0 91.1
7:21 65.66
7:21 91.3
7:22 65.66
7:22 91.3
7:23 65.64
7:23 91.2
T "*
17
1 "•
L /
1 7
17
17
17
17
17
17
EEC
17
17
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
2-3
23
1 1 N
29
29
END R
65 .54
91.0
39 .96
30. 8
62.89
34. 7
75 .36
114.1
74.11
111.2
RISE TIME [11-10-1993 -- 17:
64.92
39 .5
ISE TIME [11-10-1993 -- 17:30
'2 :2
00 ]
17:30 64.73
17:30 39.1
BEGIN FALL TIME [11-10-1993 -- 17:30:13]
I 7 ••
C\l - 1
-------
3-A 238
-------
APPENDIX B.
PROCESS OPERATING DATA
-------
-------
PROCESS DATA
THE BELDEN BRICK COMPANY
PLANT # 6
SUGARCREEK, OHIO 44681
FOR MONDAY 11/8/93
THROUGH FRIDAY 11/12/93
PREPARED BY:
JOHN C. JENSEN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
THE BELDEN BRICK COMPANY
B 3
-------
B
-------
PLT6 EPA
SUGARCREEK OHIO
PLANT INFORMATION
UH i c.:
Tuesday
11/9/93
F'LANT NUMBER 6
KILN NUMBER 3
RAW MATERIAL 5<">y.
507.
PROCESS WEIGHT BOTTOM
TYPE OF BRICK 5O3-5O5
KILN SCHEDULE 1<~>
(cars/day)
BRICK PER CAR 2496
SIZE BRICK Standard
BRICK WEIGHT ( Ibs) . . 4. 7462
PROCESS WEIGHT 4936
(Ibs/hr)
TOTAL F'ROCESS WEIGHT (Kiln)...
DRYER
F'u 11 T i mes Drver # B
Dryer # 6
Dryer # 7
Drver # 8
Dryer # 6
Drver # 7
Dryer # 8
Dryer # 6
Dryer # 7
Drver # 8
E- 1_ — r
Inlet Temo (=tack )............
KILN 4* 3
Gas Consumption (24hrs-cu. f t . )
Inlet Terno .
F'eak T e m B . .
F'ush Times.....
DRYER TUNNELS #'S...6. 7. S< 8
# 4 Shale From Shanesvil
# 4 Shale From Shanesvil
TOP 4 courses
Tues
5 50 AM
8 1O AM
10 30 AM
12 50 PM
3 00 PM
5 20 PM
7 4O PM
269
95
Tues
230 560
106
2040
5:50 AM
8: 10 AM
1 0 : 30 AM
12:50 AM
3:00 PM
5:20 PM
7:40- PM
Acid Bric^
10
976
Standard
6. 0525
2461
Wed
5 30 AM
7 50 AM
10 10 AM
12 30 PM
2 50 PM
5 10 PM
7 30 PM
9 50 PM
265
1 OO
Wed
2.2-6,000
124
2040
5 30 AM
7 50 AM
10 10 AM
12 30 PM
2 50 PM
5 10 PM
7 30 PM
9 50 PM
Thur
7:10 AM
9:30 AM
1 1 : 50 AM
2:10 PM
4:30 PM
6:50 PM
1 1 : 30 PM
274
10C>
Thur
140
203 1
7:10 AM
9:30 AM
1 1 : 50 AM
2:10 PM
4 : 30 PM
6:50 PM
1 1 : 30 PM
to 1 stack
le Fit # 2
le Pit # 3
TOTAL
3472
7397
?
-------
Standard
Cored
PLANT # 6 SUGARCREEK OHIO
BRICK WEIGHTS (LBS)
Green
Brick
B/4 Dryer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Average. . .
Loss of wgt
"/. Wot lost..
loss of wgt
"/: Wot lost . .
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
in
i n
5492
5688
6050
5778
5836
5442
5628
5722
5720
5906
5726
d rver .....
kiln
Dried
Brick
B/4 Kiln
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
. . . . . <">.
. . . . 1
7542
7422
7488
7362
7386
7264
7610
7404
7410 :
7736
7462
8264
4.83V.
Monday
11/8/93
Fi red
Brick
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4690
4632
4656
4734
4718
4714
4592
4508
4726
4552
4652
2810
5.92/.
B 6
-------
Singles PLANT # 6 SUGARCREEK OHIO Mondav
Solids BRICK WEIGHTS (LBS) 11/8/93
Green
Brick
B/4 Dryer
1 7.0544
2 7.0124
3 7 . 0590
4 6.9950
5 6.9944
6 7.1330
7 7 . 0484
8 6.9942
9 7 . 0306
10 7 . 0 1 32
Average... 7.0335
Loss o~f wcit in dryer.......
7. Wot lost
V. Wot lost
Dried
Brick
B/4 Kiln
6 . 0860
6. 0678
6. 1132
6.01 04
6.0244
6. 0384
6.O186
6. 0104
6-0858
6. O702
6.0525
... 0 . 98<">9
1-3. 95V.
Fi red
Brick
5.6532
5.6586
5.6700
5.6910
5.6818
5.6560
5.7018
5. 6506
5. 6566
5.6720
5.6692
. . . . . O 3834
-------
TRKJLOADS.EPA
Ave Load = 25 Ton
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
RECORD OF TRUCKLOADS RECEIVED
Tuesday
11/9/93
TIME
7:20 AM
7:70 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:32 AM
9:15 AM
9:25 AM
9:40 AM
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
11:OO AM
11:10 AM
12:15 PM
1:OO PM
1:10 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:2O PM
2:30 PM
SHALE
S'ville
Pit # 2
S'ville
Pit # 3
S'ville
Pit tt 2
CLAY
Moomaw
Pit # 1
Wai lick
Pit # 6
X
X
TOTALS
LOADS 5 3
TONS 125 75
TOTAL TONS FIRECLAY RECEIVED.
4
100
50
6
150
8
-------
Empty
1/4 Full
1/2 Full
3/4 Full
Full
Beg inn ing
of Shift
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
RECORD OF BIN CONDITION
ur-i i t_ •
Tuesday
11/9/93
COARSE BINS
SHALE
S'vi1le S'vi 1 le
Pit tt 2 Pit tt 3
CLAY
S'ville
Pit # 2
Ful 1
Moomaw
Pit # 1
Ful 1
Wa11i c k
Pit #
-------
Pullv RPM.
Fully Diam
Belt Width
Belt Speed
Empty Tub
TIME
7:52 AM
8:29 AM
S:44 AM
8:59 AM
9:14 AM
9:29 AM
9:44 AM
9:59 AM
10: 14 AM
10:29 AM
10:44 AM
10:59 AM
11:14 AM
1 1 : 29 AM
11:44 AM
11:59 AM
12: 14 PM
Ave Wo t . . .
Ton /Hr . . . .
eter inches. .
i nches ......
FPM
Wg t pounds. . .
NET
WEIGHT
247.75
251.75
232.25
234.75
233.75
241.75
236.75
244.75
237.75
251.75
241.75
237 . 75
231.75
23to . 25
245.75
227.75
234.75
239.34
. . . 43. OS
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT Tuesday
FIRECLAY SCREENS PRODUCTION 11/9/93
37.726 *Sample should be taken every
1 j minutes.
16 *Samole should be taken for
1 1_) seconds.
20 *Part of sample should Pe
— — baoQed every 1 1/^c. hours.
157 *Samplinci should continue for
4 hours.
20.25
SAMPLED BAGGED (Y/N) SAMPLE NUMBER
* Time extended due to power failure
=================== ===================
Yes, time marked on bag
Yes, time marked on bag
Yes, time marked on bao
Total tons of fireclay ground (in 8 hours)
344.65
B 10
-------
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
FIRECLAY DUST COLLECTOR
This represents the weight of du$t collected during the above date
Hopper under dust collector should be emptied and cleaned before test
beg ins.
Hooper under dust collector should be emptied and cleaned after test
ends. That dust must also be weighed and logged on report.
Empty Weight Hopper # 1
Empty Weight Hopper # 2
12400
12400
HOPPER
NUMBER
1
TIME
HOPPER
FILLED
10:00 AM
l.-OO PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
GROSS
HOPPER
WEIGHT
14000
14080
14140
12920
FULL
HOPPER
WEIGHT
16OO
1680
1740
520
Total dust removed from dust collector (Ibs)
5540
B 11
-------
TRK_LOADS.EPA
Ave Load = 25 Ton
PLANT * 6 - GRINDING PLANT
RECORD OF TRUCKLOADS RECEIVED
Thursday
11/11/93
TIME
7:00 AM
7:20 AM
7:23 AM
8:00 AM
8:05 AM
8:45 AM
9:33 AM
1O:00 AM
1O:17 AM
1O:40 AM
1O:55 AM
11:25 AM
12:01 PM
12:25 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:15 PM
2:4O PM
SHALE
S'vi1le S'vi1 le
Pit * 2 Pit « 3
CLAY
S'ville Moomaw Wallick
Pit ft 2 Pit # 1 Pit # 6
X
X
X
TOTALS
LOADS 3 3
TONS 75 75
TOTAL TONS FIRECLAY RECEIVED.
7
175
1
25
5
125
325
B 12
-------
Empty
1/4 Ful1
1/2 Ful1
3/4 Ful1
Ful 1
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
RECORD OF BIN CONDITION
Thursday
11/11/93
COARSE BINS
Beg inning
of Shift
SHALE
S'vi1 le
Pit * 2
S'vi 1 le
Pit ft 3
CLAY
S'ville Moomaw Wallick
Pit # 2 Pit # 1 Pit # 6
1/2 Ful 1 Ful 1 3/4 Ful 1
End
of Shift
1/2 Full 1/2 Full 3/4 Full
FINES BINS
Beg inning
of Shift
3/4 Ful 1
End
of Shift
3/4 Ful 1
NOTES:
Began grinding at 7:00 AM
Grinding plant worked straight through lunch
Shut down grinding plant at 2:40 PM
Grinding plant operated for 7-3/4 hours
B 13
-------
inc. DC.J-iUC.IN DI%. J WIN
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
FIRECLAY SCREENS PRODUCTION
Thursday
11/11/93
==========
Pu 1 1 v RPM.
Pully Diameter inches..
Belt Width
Belt Speed
Empty Tub
TIME
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
8:00 AM
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11 : 15 AM
11:30 AM
Ave Wet...
Ton/Hr ....
FPM
Wgt pounds . . .
NET
WEIGHT
251.25
250.75
242.75
235.25
227.75
228.75
236.25
226.75
226.25
242.25
241.75
238.75
241.75
224. 25
231. 75
224.50
220.75
234. 79
42. 26
37.726 *Sample should be taken every
16 *Sample should be taken for
==—====— 10 seconds.
20 #Part of sample should be
157 *Samp ling shou 1 d corit inue for
20. 25
SAMPLED BAGGED (Y/N) SAMPLE NUMBER
Yes, time marked on bag
=================== ===================
Yes, time marked on bag
Yes, time marked on bag
Total tons of fireclay ground (in 8 hours)
338.10
B 14
-------
PLANT # 6 - GRINDING PLANT
FIRECLAY DUST COLLECTOR
Thursday
11/11/93
This represents the weight of dust collected during the above date
Hopper under dust collector should be emptied and cleaned before test
begins.
Hopper under dust collector should be emptied and cleaned after test
ends. That dust must also be weighed and logged on report.
Empty Weight Hopper # 1
Empty Weight Hopper # 2
12400
: = = = ==::
12400
TIME
HOPPER HOPPER
NUMBER FILLED
1 10:00
2 12:30
1 1:45
2 2:50
1 3: 10
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
GROSS
HOPPER
WEIGHT
13820
14040
13740
13780
12780
FULL
HOPPER
WEIGHT
1420
1640
1340
1380
380
Total dust removed from dust collector (Ibs)
6160
B 15
-------
-B 16
-------
APPENDIX C.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
C.1 SAMPLE LOG
C.2 FILTER AND BEAKER TARE WEIGHTS
C.3 GRINDING/SCREENING RESULTS
C.3.1 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Inlet PM/PM-10
C.3.2 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Outlet PM/PM-10
C.3.3 Grinding/Screening Ambient PM-10
C.3.4 Grinding/Screening Product Material Sieve/Moisture
Analysis
C.4 KILN RESULTS
C.4.1 Kiln PM/PM-10
C.4.2 Kiln Condensible PM
C.4.3 Kiln Multiple Metals/PM
C.4.4 Kiln Semivolatile Organic Compounds
C.4.5 Kiln Volatile Organic Compounds
C.4.6 Kiln HCI/HF/PM
-------
-------
C.1 SAMPLE LOG
C- 3
-------
c.
4
-------
November 11, 1993
MIDWEST RESEARCH INST1T
Sum
401 Harrison Oaks Bouk
Gary, North Carolina 27513-
Telephone(919)677-
FAX(919)677-
To:
From:
Subject:
M. St. Germain, M. Whitacre, A. Mainey
R. Marinshaw
Request for Analysis of Samples From Belden Brick
Emission Test
MRI Project No. 4601-01
Under EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0159, Work Assignment I-01, an
emission test was conducted at the Belden Brick Company Plant
No. 6, Sugarcreek, Ohio, during the week of November 8, 1993.
The attached tables list all of the samples and analyses
required. Please refer to the site-specific test plan, dated
October 22, 1993, for a detailed description of the test
locations, test methods, and QA requirements for the test.
Please take note that the complete charge numbers for this
emission test are as follows:
Field test
VOST analysis
Semi-VOST analysis
Metals analysis
QA/QC
Reporting
1.0 PARTICULATE MATTER
4601-01-05-01
4601-01-05-02
4601-01-05-03
4601-01-05-04
4601-01-05-05
4601-01-05-06
Three Method 201A runs were conducted on the inlet to the
baghouse for the grinding/screening room, and two Method 201A
runs were conducted on the outlet to the grinding/screening room
fabric filter. These samples are to be analyzed for PM less than
or equal to 10 micrometers (/*m) and PM greater than 10 /*m. In
addition, Hi-Vol samplers were used to sample ambient PM-10
inside the grinding/screening room (three runs) and outside the
grinding/screening room (three runs on the east side and two runs
on the west side). The Hi-Vol filters must be analyzed for two
runs at each of the three locations.
The kiln was sampled for PM emissions using three sampling
trains. Three Method 201/202 runs were conducted. These samples
must be analyzed for PM less than or equal to 10 /xm, PM greater
than 10 fj.m, condensible inorganic PM, and condensible organic PM.
Three Method 26A runs were conducted, and the samples from this
train must be analyzed for filterable PM. Finally, three Method
0029 runs were conducted. The samples from these runs must also
be analyzed for filterable PM. Please note that the filters for
the Method 201A train are to be weighed, heated to 320°F, and
reweighed. Table l summarizes the PM samples from the
grinding/screening room and kiln that must be analyzed.
-------
TABLE 1. PM SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Grinding/Screening Room fabric filter inlet- -Method 201A
Preseparator rinse (d > 10/x)
Cyclone rinse (d s 10/i)
In-stack filter (d s 10/i)
1001
1002
1003
2001
2002
2003
3001
3002
3003
Grinding/Screening Room fabric filter outlet- -Method 201A
Preseparator rinse (d > 10^)
Cyclone rinse (d <: 10/x)
In-stack filter
1006
1007
1008
2006
2007
2008
NA
NA
NA
Grinding/Screening Room ambient- -Hi- Vol sampler
Hi-Vol filter # (Inside)
Hi-Vol filter # (Outside- -east)
Hi-Vol filter # (Outside- -west)
1011
1013
4011
2011
2013
5011
3011
3013
NA
Kiln Stack- -Method 201A/202
Preseparator rinse (d > 10^)
Cyclone rinse (d s 10/x)
Front-half rinse
Out-stack filter (d <: 10/x) a
Condensate and water rinse
Back- half rinse (Methylene chloride)
1014
1015
1017
1018
1019
1020
2014
2015
2017
2018
2019
2020
3014
3015
3017
3018
3019
3020
Kiln Stack—Method 26A
Front -half rinse (acetone)
Filter
1022
1023
2022
2023
3022
3023
Kiln Stack- -Method 0029 (Multi-metals)
Front half rinse (acetone)
Filter
1065
1030
2065
2030
3065
3030
-------
TABLE 2. (Continued)
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Reagent Blanks
Acetone (Method 201A)
Out-stack filter (Method 201A)
Methylene chloride (Method 202)
Hi-Vol filter
Acetone (Method 26A)
Filter (Method 26A)
Filter (Method 0029)
1047
1049
1062
1050
1051
1052
1056
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
filters for Method 201A train must be weighed, heated to 320°F,
and reweighed.
c
7
-------
2.0 PROCESS SAMPLES
Three process samples were collected from the conveyor that
transports from the grinding/screening room to the fine material
storage bins. These samples must be analyzed for moisture. In
addition, a sieve analysis must be conducted on these samples
according to the procedures described in AP-42, Appendix E,
Procedures for Laboratory Analysis of Surface/Bulk Dust Loading
Samples. Table 2 summarizes the process samples to be analyzed.
TABLE 2. GRINDING/SCREENING ROOM PROCESS SAMPLES
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Grinding/Screening Room- -fine material conveyor
Process sample
Process sample
1012
1013
2012
2013
3012
3013
c
-------
3.0 VOST
The kiln was sampled for volatile organic compounds using a
Method 0030 (VOST) sampling train. Three runs were conducted.
Trap pairs 2, 4, and 6 must be analyzed according to Method 8240
for the compounds listed in Figure 5-9 of the test plan. In
addition, one pair of field blank traps and one pair of trip
blank traps must be analyzed. There was no VOST condensate.
Table 3 summarizes the VOST samples for analysis.
TABLE 3. VOST SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS
Sample
Sample
Kiln Stack—Method 0030 (VOST)
Pair 1 Tnx
Pair 1 T/C
Pair 2 Tnxa
Pair 2 T/Ca
Pair 3 Tnx
Pair 3 T/C
Pair 4 Tnxa
Pair 4 T/Ca
Pair 5 Tnx
Pair 5 T/C
Pair 6 Tnxa
Pair 6 T/Ca
Pair 7 Tnx
Pair 7 T/C
Field blank Tnx13
Field blank T/Cb
Trip blank Tnx13
Trip blank T/Cb
Field blank Tnx13
Field blank T/Cb
Trip blank Tnx13
Trip blank T/Cb
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
1075
1076
1077
1078
2075
2076
2077
2078
9
-------
aTrap pairs 2, 4 and 6 to be analyzed.
bOne pair of field and trip blanks to be analyzed.
4.0 Semi-VOST
The kiln was sampled for semi-volatile organic compounds
using a Method 0010 (semi-VOST) sampling train. Three runs were
conducted. Please note that the back half samples were split
into two fractions. The two sample fractions for Run 1 (1038 and
1038A) should be analyzed separately; for each of the other two
runs, the two fractions should be combined for the analysis. The
samples must be analyzed for the compounds listed in Figure 5-11
of the test plan. Table 4 summarizes the semi-VOST samples for
analysis.
TABLE 4. SEMI-VOST SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS.
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Kiln Stack- -Method 0010 (semi-VOST)
Front -half rinse
Filter
Back- half rinse
Back- half rinse
XAD Cartridge #
Condensate
1036
1037
1038a
103 8Aa
1039
1040
2036
2037
2038b
2038Ab
2039
2040
3036
3037
3038b
3038Ab
3039
3040
Blanks
Methanol
Methylene chloride
XAD Cartridge #
1061
1062
1063
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Analyze each fraction of back half rinse sample separately.
bCombine both back half rinse sample fractions for analysis.
-------
5.0 Hydrogen Fluoride/Hydrogen Chloride (HF/HC1)
The kiln was sampled for HF/HC1 using Method 26A. Three
runs were conducted. The front half of the sampling train is to
be analyzed for PM as shown in Table 1. The HF/HC1 aliguots from
the sampling train are to be sent to Galbraith Laboratory for
analysis. Table 5 summarizes the HF/HC1 samples for analysis.
TABLE 5. HF/HC1 SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS
Sample
Run I
Run 2
Run 3
Kiln Stack- -Method 26A
XX024 Aliquot (C1,/HF)
XX026 Aliquot (C12/HF)
1025
1027
2025
2027
3025
3027
Blanks
0.1N H2S04
0.1N NaOH
1053
1054
NA
NA
NA
NA
C 11
-------
6.0 Metals
The kiln was sampled for metals using Method 0029. Three
runs were conducted. The front half of the sampling train is to
be analyzed separately for PM as shown in Table 1 prior to the
metals analysis. The front and back halves of the sampling train
should be analyzed separately for the following 11 metals:
arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, beryllium, antimony, lead,
mercury, manganese, nickel, and selenium. Please note that the
samples from the back half of the sampling train (Impingers 1 to
3) were split into two fractions. The two sample fractions for
Run 1 (1031 and 1031A) should be analyzed separately; for each of
the other two runs, the two back half fractions should be
combined for the analysis. Table 5 summarizes the metals samples
for analysis.
TABLE 6. METALS SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Kiln Stack- -Method 0029
Front -half 0 . IN HNO^
Filter
Acetone rinse residue
Impingers 1-3 (HNO-,/H202)
Impingers 1-3 (HNO3/H202)
Impinger 4 + 0 . IN HNO^ rinse
Impingers 5-6 Acid KMn04
Impingers 5-6 8N HC1 rinse
1029
1030
1065
1031a
103 lAa
1032
1033
1034
2029
2030
2065
2031b
2031Ab
2032
2033
2034
3029
3030
3065
3031b
3031Ab
3032
3033
3034
Blanks
O.l N HNO-,
Filter
5% HNO^/10% H202
4% KMn04/10% H2S04
ASTM Type I water
8N HC1 + 200ml H20
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Analyze each fraction of back half (Impingers 1 to 3) sample
separately.
bCombine both back half (Impingers 1 to 3) sample fractions for
analysis.
C 12
-------
C.2 FILTER AND BEAKER TARE WEIGHTS
C 13
-------
C 14
-------
BEAKER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Sampling Team Leader: Szvdlo
Analyst:
Szvdlo
Beaker Size and Type: 150-mL borosilicate glass
Beaker Treatment: Following cleaning according to test protocol, heat at 105° C for
3 hours; desiccate; weigh to a constant weight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Time:
Balance Check
Weight Value:
Balance Reads;
Beaker
No.
/0 <*
2006
ZVI7
1001
2016
300 Z
1017
. ZI47
102,
101.
ny-o
. 3722
1 1 / /
/OJ
First Weighing
106. 00 7 &
Second Weighing
Third Weighing
Average Weight
or Weight to be
Used as the Tare
102 .
_? "y J(S
102,
32, 0
Id2 ,
S3,
if
// 7,
. ZIV3
6756
i 02.
101. > 8&I
fOl.
7
SI
/0 2 - £7/6
83,
il?. &1 7.
117, J> 722
J O*
0 ///
106.
if? .
/ / 7, 372 2
Balance Check
Balance Reads: 100, &O 73
COMMENTS:
1(30, 0078
c- is
-------
BEAKER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Sampling Team Leader: Szvdlo
Analyst:
Szvdlo
Beaker Size and Type: 150-mL borosilicate glass
Beaker Treatment: Following cleaning according to test protocol, heat at 105° C for
3 hours; desiccate; weigh to a constant weight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Time: tl'f^
Balance Check
Weight Value: ' C
Balance Reads:
Beaker
No.
ICO.
let?.
tlrt-fb
-{012
• -202. 2
- 1,02 2~
\$ 5 /
30)5
\oo
1002.
First Weighing
', Z 7V2
Second Weiahinq
3
Third Weighing
*Q. 27*3
IVJ. 6 73 5
lib
(03. t>7
33 <
no,
. 6 771
it ^.
l 12. 005)
10% .
/ ~7 70
112 . 9X72
H Z . O 0 y I
Hi. 677V
Ii2 .
12
i 1 Z . 0 O
f 0 ? . 3 / 5 \
108, •:
}0\ * 3
\0\ > 3?
Average Weight
or Weight to be
Used as the Tare
32. Z-
lit,.
i 1
, 1872.
( 1
(0 f? .
£f 7,
3
^
f
1027.
Balance Check
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
^r-^r
. 1
100, (2071,
. ao
C 16
-------
FILTER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No.
Sampling Team Leader:,
Analyst:
£/>$"/ H&lMCfJ
Filter Size and Type: 4. S-in'ch diameter Whatman QM-A, quartz fiber
Filter Treatment: Heat at 105° C for 3 hours; desiccate; veigh to a constant veight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Time: _|_
Balance Check
Weight Value:
/.ccoc-c
Balance Reads:
Filter
Ho.
3
r
7
10
i • Cccc
First Weiqhinq
0,l\
a
0.
a
0,
o.
Second Weiqhinq
(9/lU-V
~rf-
Third Weiqhinq
Average Weic
or Weight to
Used as the 1
C-
0.
Balance Check
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
^
u
C 17
-------
FILTER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No. tj(Gl - d'OT-C I
Sampling Team Leader:
Analyst: £ 3 /4//f /2/^CA-'
Filter Size and Type: 4.9-inch diameter Whatman QM-A, quartz fiber
Filter Treatment: Heat at 105° C for 3 hours; desiccate; »eigh to a constant veight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Tine: ///J/f3
Balance Check
//A/95 / ?$ V
/CI <
Weight Value:
Balance Reads:
Filter
No.
LF I
2_
3
7
to
1 CCCC
$
First Weiqhinq
1,09/2
\.0613
1,1101
, i ono
i. grv3
/
Second Weiqhinq
7
1,0X3*
/.
/. 1/71
-*-
Third Weiqhinq
A
7
/;
7
/, IOC-2
/. Q'?2V 1.0*7 2^
/. 102*+
A//
Average Weii
or Weight to
Used as the '
Balance Check
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
•J
.Fo (0*
m r
/,
'-ir
-------
FILTER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No. CftO I - Ql -
Sampling Team Leader; ._.-f^lr:
Analyst:
___ _ __
Filter Size and Type: 4.9-inch diameter Whatman QM-A, quarts fiber
Filter Treatment: Heat at 105° C for 3 hours; desiccate; veigh to a constant weight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Tine:
Balance Check
Weight Value:
/3/9
j—*—
3 C<&
' . CCOC g
Balance Reads: j CCCC
Filter
No.
LF a
>_z_
L3_
H
u
*
to
First Weighing
/. 0778"
// hi*,
—
7 /
.
Second Weighing
/,
(JO 1
/. // 31
///w/f? / c&
'vl
Third Weighing
UL
I.CJ37
/jo/0
2
Ulc/
Average Welg
or Weight to
Used as the T
Balance Checjt
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
/• 0000' <
^6^
-------
FILTER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project No.
Sampling Team Leader:
"' o <-o
Analyst:
Filter Size and Type: 4.9-inch diameter Whatman QM-A, quartz fiber
Filter Treatment: Heat at 105° C for 3 hours; desiccate; veigh to a constant veight
Weight Unit: grams
Date/Time:
Balance Check
Weight Value:
Balance Reads:
Filter
No.
SSF - 1
3 5 F - ?
SS>~- "/
— '7
55 P -
Ci 1$
t .(
-v
First Weighing
Oti^^H
G.
(9.
P. I
Second Weighing Third Weighing
Average Wei
or Weight to
Used as the
O.I ^6 7
0.
£. N 7?
7
G.
Balance Check
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
f
Tf
20
/, ewo c-
o
-------
FILTER TARE WEIGHT DATA
MRI Project Ho. f&ti ' 0('C ^-C I
Sampling Team Leader: $"7 ''OL i
Analyst:
C Aj
Filter Size and Type: 4.9-inch diameter Whatman QM-A, quartz fiber
Filter Treatment: Heat at 105° C for 3 hours; desiccate; veigh to a constant weight
Weight Unit: grama
Date/Tine: ///;/? 7 I' $''"
Balance Check
Weight Value: A L~t~'7^- y-
u
hh?
-*r
L - C'Z'TT
Balance Reads: _[ ' (, '- f U y I . 6'6'C^" <-\ L ^ O'^TC -y Average Weig
Filter ' " tfor Weight to
No. First Weighing Second Weighing Third Weiqhinq Uaed as the T,
--(3
Sir -I*
--tk
1-1-7
~-tf
0. /VY7
C.I 5 II
c.
OJSHI
CJStO
Balance Check
Balance Reads:
COMMENTS:
M
21
-f-
-------
C 22
-------
C.3 GRINDING/SCREENING RESULTS
C 23
-------
C 24
-------
C.3.1 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Inlet PM/PM-10
C - 25
-------
C 26
-------
FILTER PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No. ' 4601.01.05.01
Sampling Location: 4Ciln
a u j
Client: EPA - Emission Inventory Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, Ohio
Analyst: Szydlo
Filter samples hoated Fit- 1fiO° C for -3—3 h
weight. «•/« ** ' ttJ'-c.J ft' *S & b°
desiccated, and weighed to a constant
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No .
* -/ Filter No.
Gross Wt. (q)
Gross Wt. (q)
Gross Wt. (cr)
Gross Wt. (q)
3 70
Date
I/-22 -<*
Sample No.
Time
t?f0o
/ 0
//- J 2 -fj /
//-,?
// - 2 3- f >
Filter +• Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (g) > 3 TV/ >
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g) , 2 ff t?<9
COMMENTS :
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No .
Filter
Date
Sample No..
Time
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
11-2 z-
332?
n- z
Filter + Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)_
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (q) , 267*1
COMMENTS:
FILTER
SAMPLE: Run No.
Filter No.
Gross Wt. (g)
COMMENTS:
NOTE: Control filter weight data and balance check data are on another form.
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kilft-
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
Run No.
/
FRONT-HALF RINSES:
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker No. lOOt
Beaker
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(B) :
2 32. 0
Sample No. 1301
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date
82. O
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(g).
(g).
(g).
(g).
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt
Beaker Tare Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data
Acetone Wt
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry
. I 700
Time
tfb. 11> 39 IZ -<
12 00
12 -at, ~
1700
Combined Blank
COMMENTS:
(g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) = "
&(>.
82.OW)
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No.
Beaker No.
». t0Ol
Beaker +
Gross Wt .
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt .
Gross Wt.
S
Sam;
(g)
(g)
(g)
(q)
amp
pie
10
IP
(0
le No.
1 &0 Z
Residue Weights:
Date Time
^•23^H l2-0£,-q-> OfOO
q.m
1.2 14
V 12 -0(> -ZO
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : /ZiJ
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) =
COMMENTS:
tf . Kf> PC,
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. / Beaker No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Sample No..
Beaker
Water Wt.(A)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(B) :
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt.
Time
Gross Wt.
(g)
(g)
(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt
Beaker Tare Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
from Recovery Data
Acetone Wt
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry
(g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B)) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
mg/mL
C 28
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. 2.
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker No. Z O 0 I Sample No. Z 0 O )
Beaker
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(B) :
2 1>2. (J
// 2,
I 7- 0
Gross
Gross
Gross
Gross
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Wt. (q) ///. #77<7 12 -Ot,-*..
wt. (g) ///, ^777 n -at,--)
(g).
(g).
Wt
Wt
//<.
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt
Beaker Tare Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data
Acetone Wt
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS:
Time
of oo
00
I r « a
//>/
III ,
_ mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. 2.
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker No. Z&02. Sample No. Z. 002
2 ,
&C,,2
~76 . 6,
Beaker
Gross
Gross
Gross
Gross
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Wt.(g)
(g).
(q) ff&.tJOW 11 -06-
(g)
Wt
Wt
Wt
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : 4 7
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = '
COMMENTS:
Time
0*00
&£,.
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. Beaker No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Sample No._
Beaker +
Water Wt . (A)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(B) :
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
Time
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
Beaker Tare Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
from Recovery Data
Acetone Wt
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g) _
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g) _
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = _
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
mg/mL
C 29
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
Beaker No. J0O/ Sample No. 3&O)
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (g) I0(, . LlJi*} 12 -06-13
/ 1?.2 .
£>Z .
FRONT -HALF RINSES: Run No. J
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt . (g)
Water Wt . (A) from Recovery Data: (g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) :
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt . used for data entry (g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)_
Combined Blank = {(Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) =
COMMENTS :
Time
<£ 2 ,
Gross Wt. (g) lot, .U
Gross Wt. (g) / Ob ,y
Gross Wt.(g)
12 -06-yj
t-ri
-7*3.1
i O 7 . U 71Z
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. D
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
/^
Beaker No. ^O&Z Sample No..
O O 7
//?/ ~7
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights :
Date
Gross Wt. (q) //$". &771 12 -Jk-*-)
Gross Wt . (g) /y/>jT777 / z -0A -91
Gross Wt. (g) //?, ^y 7-5
Gross Wt.(g)
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS:
Time
/ 2 i >
I 71
mg/mL
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. Beaker No. Sample No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) = .
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
(g)
(g)
(g)
Time
Gross Wt.(g).
mg/mL
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
1 C - 30
-------
C.3.2 Grinding/Screening Baghouse Outlet PM/PM-10
C 31
-------
C 32
-------
FILTER PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MR I Project No. 4601.01.05.01
Sampling Location:
Client: EPA - Emission Inventory Branch (BIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, Ohio
Analyst: Szvdlo '
Filter samples
weight.
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No.
3 heuro, desiccated, and weighed to a constant
Filter No .
Gross Wt. (q) 0' • J,
Gross Wt.(g) 0 , 2
Date
H- Zt-
Sample No.
Time
// - Z 2 -f}
// _ g •} - fj
// ~ Z 5- •/ 1
Time
ffifff
C? ff00
ft ff
Filter + Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
COMMENTS:
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No.
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
Gross Wt. (g).
Filter No.
Date
Sample No..
Time
Filter + Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
COMMENTS:
NOTE: Control filter weight data and balance check data are on another form.
H C 33
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICIPATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.: 4601.01.05.01 Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Sampling Location: -Rllii- . , , / v Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst: Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No . _ j _ Beaker No . /' 0 0 d Sample No . / &
Beaker Tare Wt . (g) _ Gross Wt. (q) /f 3. ?2%7 _ if __ ;2 Jc?
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) _ Gross Wt. (g) IO1. 3^» 7 " __ / 7 3 7 Gross Wt . (CT) l&l, 3 ?-YP tZ-&£-?3 d g ~$ O
Beaker Tare Wt . (g) Idt, '3 ~ Gross Wt . (g) / Ol . 3 ?V> 12 - 0L -41 H TV
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) 43, 3 Gross Wt . (CT) oft . "3 tZ -06 - <9 ") if 3 f
Water Wt. (A) from Recovery Data: (g) -— Gross Wt . (g) _____
Acetone Wt . (g) H5 • )
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : fT7. O
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt . used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt . from tare weight data (q) i0l .
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = — mg/mL
COMMENTS:
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. Beaker No. Sample No.
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle: Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date Time
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) Gross Wt. (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. (g) Gross Wt. (g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g) Gross Wt.(g)
Water Wt. (A) from Recovery Data: (g) Gross Wt. (g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)_
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = mg/mL
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
C 34
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICIPATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
/
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
_Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air;- then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
Run No.
FRONT-HALF RINSES:
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker No . Z 004,
Beaker
Sample No . 2
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) ' ^3- '
Beaker Tare Wt.(g) I Ob* 6
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) XL ,9
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(g).
(g).
(g).
(g).
101,.
Time
_L
11
i a
Water Wt. (A) from Recovery Data: (g)
Acetone Wt. (g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) :
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS :
II
I 7
71*
** _ mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES:
Sample Volume +
Sample No. 2 067
Run No. 2. Beaker No. 2. OK} 7
Acetone Rinses of Bottle: Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
?) C
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(g).
(g).
(g).
(g).
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B): 3 4
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) =
COMMENTS:
•f
Time
0*30
JJL.
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. Beaker No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Sample No._
Beaker
(g)
(g)
(g)
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt.
Gross Wt.
Time
(g).
(g).
(g).
(g).
Sample + Rinses Wt.
Beaker Tare Wt.
Sample + Rinses Wt.
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A -t- B) =
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
mg/mL
C 35
-------
C 36
-------
C.3.3 Grinding/Screening Ambient PM-10
C 37
-------
C - 38
-------
Filter
Number
First Weigh
Weight
(mg)
By
Date
Audit
Weight
Difference
Meets
Q.A. ?
By
Date
Reweigh
Weight
(mg)
By
Date
o.c?5
t £•
OCTL.
00^
Qcrf
0-15
O.QO
H322.Z5
o.oo
GfO
Note: * By Audit Weight Indicates Audit of Reweigh
Comments:
C 39
-------
Filter
Number
First Weigh
Weight
By Date
Audit
Weight
(mg)
Difference
(mg)
Meets
Q.A. ?
By
Date
Reweigh
Weight
(mg)
By
Dai
O-Jo
Ooi,
oof
o-os
an
49JK
O-OO
H 331.
0/0
Note: * By Audit Weight Indicates Audit of Reweigh
Comments:
C 40
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Project/Acct.
Project Title -
A
Signature .
>£
Nrv
a*
^ fa
ti^*
nntft/TimP :?//'2-/9lS'
U^CV-JL- ' ' - '
e-^fwi^ Vprifipri hy
(signature/date)
-nyW*M.\ FJ^-^ f>v^\ A3
Phone Contact
Meeting Notes
Work Sheet
Page
WA^I
a
D
&
of
! ! I : i : . ; i i i
-------
.C 42
-------
C.3.4 Grinding/Screening Product Material Sieve/Moisture Analysis
C 43
-------
C 44
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Run No.
MRI Project No..
Si If and Moisture Analysis*
Recorded by
Material:
Total Sample
(Excl. Container)
Number of
Oven Temperature.
Date In /£^-f3 Date Out.
Time In /?%? Time Out
Drying Time
Split Sample Balance :
Make
Capacity.
Smallest Division
7. /
**„
MOISTURE CONTENT:
(A) Wet Sample Wt. .
(B) Dry Sample Wt. .
(C) Difference Wt._
C X 100
Moisture
Sample No:.
(S
Split Sample Weight (before drying)
Pan + Sample: W^' 7
Pan: /&?*¥
Wet Sample: /f£,/
Material Weight (after drying)
Pan + Material! &2,&'l
Pan:
Dry Sample:
y^
Sieving
Time: Start:
Initial (Tare):
20 min:
30 min:
40 min:
Weighr (Pan Only)
4&V7
&f'5
ffr-Y
?&J
SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Screen
3/8 in..
4 mesh
10 mesh
20 mesh
40 mesh
100 mesh
140 mesh
200 mesh
Pan
Tare Weight
(Screen )
W1H
%&<$
4ft £
Ifr'i*
1*f1,b
flf ,4
iffaOSl
Final Weight
(Screen + Sample )
%74
5*^5 /•£
-^2r^
ifai-
%&*{
fM
fo4t\
Net Weight (Sample)
2,2-
W?,?>
/&$,$
{0(5,6,
'Z-I-Z
/W
7-K/
%
OM't
O^J ^
^7*2. ^
V-'
Wt
^tc
£.6
Net Weight
Net Weight <200 meshj
%Si|f»N"Wei^<200M"h xioo =
Total Net Weight
'Indicate Units \vith all Weights
X 100 =
/7O
-------
Run No.
MR! Project No..
t
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Silt and Moisture Analysis*
Recorded by
Material*
Sample No:.
(Excl. Container)
Number of Splits: _
Split Sample Weight (before drying)
Pan T Sample: ^^' "?
Pan:
Wet Sample:
9 .
in l<-'v~^ Date Out.
Time In //yv Time Out
Drying Time
Split Sample Balance:
Make
Capacity
Smallest Division Q,\
(*?***.(*..
Material Weighr (after drying)
Pan -r Materiel; *7li>'S
Pan:
Dry Sample:.
-o
Sieving
:£-
MOISTURE CONTENT:
(A)
(B)
(C) Difference Wt.
C X 100
Moisture
SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Time: Start:
Initial (Tcre):
20 min:
30 min:
40 min:
Weighr (Pan Only)
'%fr'*
4 £*-/,&
y&'f
4fy4
Screen
Tare Weight
{ Screen)
Final Weight
(Screen •*• Sample)
Net Weight (Sample )
3/8 i
n.
4 mesh
10 mesh
20 mesh
40 mesh
100 mesh
1 40 mesh
A
200 mesh
r •/
Pan
Net Weight <200 mesh:
% Si Its =
Net Weight < 200 Mesh
100 =
Total Net Weight
Indicate Units with all Weights
X 100 =
/-7Q
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Run No.
MR1 Project No..
Silt and Mo (store Anaiysis*
Recorded by
otcrial-
Total Sample
(Excl. Contc
Number of Si
Oven Temper
Dat* |n !1-(
Tim* In /^
Split Sample
Make
Smallest Di
MOISTURE C
(A) Wet Sc
(B) Dry Sa
(C) Differs
C X 10
A
Screen
3/8 in.
4 mesh
10 mesh
20 mesh
40 mesh
100 mesh
140 mesh
200 mesh
Pan
Net Weight
Net Weight
%Silt: N
fiY^ Ch~ SnmpU No? /Y-f-'f? (3> /ZH
W»inUf. Ji(O^f\. Split Samoia Weight (before drying)
liner) -7 Pcn +Sampl'?! <$-'''
,1;*. -^ Pan: ft/. O
s- »•_, Wet Samole: T^^- '
nttira (&~) £-~
't'tfh Date Out /•*•'/' //, „. Mr^ji.1 Ijil Wiit -!ir ( n^a.i - jJruInrt \
2_,- Time Out t*W , _,._. pan -r Ma^ricl- ^f-^
Balance: Drv Samole: ^0^'$
J3sufeljl>s)
m&V y Sieving
vision /Vioisiure /4~-(fr
SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Tare Weight Final Weight
(Screen) (Screen •*• Sample ) Net Weight (Sample ) %
1
f^7,5" ^f^/ /14- 0,3?
y/^,^ • ^'f /^7'4- !z?.£
^#X? y
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Run No.
Silt and Moisture Analysis*
Total
(Excl. Container)
Number of Splits: .
Oven Temperature.
Date In tl'lf~
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Run No.
MRI Project No..
Silt and Moisture Analysis*
Material:
_7
(Excl. Container)
Number of Splits: _
Oven Temperature.
Date In /z^~?3 Date Out.
Time In f^W Time. Out.
Drying Time
Split Sample Balance :
Make
Capacity
Smallest Division
MOISTURE CONTENT:
(A) Wet Sample Wt. _
(B) Dry Sample Wt. _
(C) Difference Wt
c x 100
f -
% Moisture
Sample No? //"//-
Split Sample Weight (before drying)
Pan -(-Sample: &ft• f
Pan:
Wet Sample:
ft 7
Material Weight (after drying)
Pan •*• Material:.
Pan:
iryinc
Dry Sample:.
T *? ^ ' '
Sieving
Time: Start:
Initial (Tare):
20 min:
30 min:
40 min:
Weight (Pan Only)
^7
fty-S
fit*
4W.(.
SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Screen
Tare Weight
(Screen)
Final Weight
(Screen + Sample )
Net Weight (Sample)
3/8 i
n.
4 mesh
10 mesh
20 mesh
40 mesh
100 mesh
140 mesh
200 mesh
<20
Net Weight <200 mesh:
_, . Net Weight <200 Mesh
/Q Jllt?= ^______
Total Net Weight
*|ndicate Units with all Weights
X 100
- I/
%
/-7Q
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Run No.
MRI Project
Silt1 and Moisture Analysis*
Material:
(Excl. Container)
Number of Splits: _
Oven Temperature-
Date In /2-^-?3 Date Out
Time In /Y2-*5 Time Out
Drying
1 *^ J*^ W t
J3.hr
Split Sample Balance :
Make ^
Capacity
Smallest Division
^
MOISTURE CONTENT:
C X 100
Recorded by
% Moisture
Sample No:.
Split Sample Weight (before drying)
Pan T Sample:
Pan: •
Wet Sample:
Material Weight (after drying)
Pan -r Material; 6>0#
W3
Net Weight (Sample)
0/->
*O
I
/.£
/?f?7
^,0
#7.1
. Z/.7
rt.t
??,*?
J
Vf
1/-C
Z.U
/?'
y^
^?i
^/
Net Weight <200 mesh:
r.S;if;- N.t Weigh, <200 Me.h y ]QQ =
Total Net Weight
"Indicate Units with all Weights
X 100 =
4/78
-------
C.4 KILN RESULTS
-------
o
-------
C.4.1 Kiln PM/PM-10
C 53
-------
C 54
-------
FILTER PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project Mo. ' 4601.01.05.01 Client: EPA - Emission Inventory Branch (EIB)
Sampling Location: Kiln - Prtlti Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, Ohio
Analyst: Szydlo
Filter samples heated at 160° C for 2-3 hours, desiccated, and weighed to a constant
weight .
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No. rtpri-iG 'I Filter No . ^ >' % Sample No .
Date Time
Gross Wt. (q) /•/ O ^ 7 12 -01 '11 O'tQ-i
Gross Wt. (a) /, / o ~$ 3 __ M __ "
Gross Wt. (a) i , i a 3 '/ __ ^ __ o <4 5 /
Gross Wt. (g) l . i 3 ? 7 __ u __ ,i
Filter + Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (q) I • f 0 3 7
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g) I • I tf 2Z
COMMENTS :
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No. ^p'1 '10 *i Filter No. £f1 Sample No.
Date Time
Gross Wt. (Q) {. ' &b° tl -Ol -1 7 OfO 7
Gross Wt. (q) / . / £7 to I ,, »
Gross Wt. (q) I , / 0 60
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g) / . / f
COMMENTS:
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No.K IJH'IV * * Filter No._±£_/_2_ Sample No..
Date Time
Gross Wt. (a) /. g 9 ?I /2 -ffl ~9 J *seo
Gross Wt. (a) I. a _i o 3 yo
Gross Wt. (a) /. J 9 6 I ^ ••
Filter + Sample Gross Wt. used for data entry (q) // 0
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (cr) / , O 9 3 7
COMMENTS:
NOTE: Control filter weight data and balance check data are on another form.
o r r-
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICIPATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kiln -
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
Time
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No./fV/** PiO 'I Beaker No. / OI 7 Sample No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
^3.0 Gross Wt. (a) 1/7. 374S 12-03-33
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g) / 3
I I 7- O Gross Wt. (cr) // 7,
12 <-O? -•}) 2.QQ0
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g) —
Acetone Wt. (g) / 37,
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B): /£
Gross Wt. (a) // -7. 37H4 12 - Qtj -13 VgOO
Gross Wt. (g) 1/7, 37M 12 -oH-<9t I^QO
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (q) // ~7* 3
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (c/) // 7. 3722
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = - - mg/mL
COMMENTS:
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No ./f? Ar P/0-1 Beaker No. /filf Sample No . / O / *>
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) 2
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) I &O. t
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g) —
Acetone Wt. (g) JJ>O* 0
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) :,
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date ,.Time
, O Gross Wt.(g).
Gross Wt.(g)'
Gross Wt. (g) 42.99'1? iz -Ot-^H iJSOQ
Gross Wt. (a) 32.93*13 ll -
2?2.
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Combined Blank
COMMENTS:
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (cr) 12.
(Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = •
mg/mL
PW-I Beaker No. 101*4 Sample No.
' ,2.
"18. 2
Gross Wt. (cr) 98.
Gross Wt.(g)
Gross Wt.(g)
iz -
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No.A
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle: Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) / ff 7, Z Gross Wt. (q) 38,
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 - mLs Acetone (B) :
Beaker -^'jAcetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
ys.. Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) = \
Time
2.0*0
0*00
__
. <* 28> ll -
IHOO
mg/mL
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
C 56
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kiln
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. AV/*
Beaker No . 2 0 1 7 Sample No._2_£_/_7_
Beaker
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross
Gross
Gross
Gross
Wt.
Wt.
Wt.
Wt.
(g)
(g)
(g)
(q)
t02.
102.
I0l.
/ 0 Z •
6<>2t,
£{3 Z&
bbZf
bt>i~7
l2-03'*3 Moo
1? -
i? -
12 -
9 ^
tf^
01
-91
-41
-4 7
zooo
0*00
moo
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) / 538. 0
Beaker Tare Wt.(g) 10 2 .&
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt. (A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : I Off. I
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = {{Water Blank x A) + {Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) = \
COMMENTS:
Time
(02,4,627
0- POOL mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. /*"/'/*
Beaker No . 2. & >
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker
Sample No.
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(q)
(a)
(q)
(q)
Hi.
83-
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) ' *3
Beaker Tare Wt . (g) g3/<3
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) 7 2.
Water Wt. (A) from Recovery Data: (g) -
Acetone Wt. (g) 72..*?
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : /«f ~7. <3
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g)
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS:
+ Sample Residue Weights:
Date Time
85. 33/ HZ 12 -03-f) tH PC
n -o^-l
2.000
12. -CH-1) 0*00
a-
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No.
Beaker No. 20 if
Sample No..
<*?
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (g) IO2.52Z8
Gross Wt. (g).
/2-1?"
Gross Wt. (g)/y2.Jf224 It -0H*f) Ott}O
—• Gross Wt. {g)/i?2>
/z -
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker +_Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g) f02.
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (a) /c?2 .
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) « 0.
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
Time
2.U0O
SO.
mg/mL
57
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICPIATS MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kiln
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run NQ./TVA4 PIO'I Beaker No. 30/7 Sample No. 301 ~7
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
2H&. 7
Beaker
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g)
Beaker Tare Wt . (g)
Sample + Rinses Wt. (g)
from Recovery Data: (g)
Acetone Wt . (g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) :
Water Wt. (A)
/ 42 , 0
-
\H2.O
/ 7*3. ~7
Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (CT) I0b>
Gross Wt. (g) irJt,.t>(o34 12 -<
Gross Wt. (q) I Ob
Time
Zoo a
Gross Wt. (g) 10b • hb
IZ ~
H -
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g),
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)_
Combined Blank = { (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) =
COMMENTS:
i&
31
0 .
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No . /f/-'//f PJ0'$ Beaker No . 30 / 5 Sample No .
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle :
Water Wt . (A)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(B) :
-1
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights :
Date
II -pl-
...Time
// 3 ,
gf 6
, Q
/ r
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(a)
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt
Beaker Tare Wt
Sample + Rinses Wt
from Recovery Data
Acetone Wt
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry
(q) 112. 110L 12 -
2-oao
(q) 112. 3901 12 -OH -
(g) ITl. 4101
12 -
1*400
103 ,~7
Combined Blank
COMMENTS:
(g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
{(Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) =
1/2.*
1 1 2 .
. mg/mL
Run
Beaker No.
30M
Beaker
Sample No.
+ Sample Residue Weights :
Date
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
Gross Wt
(a)
(a)
_ (a)
_ - Gross Wt. (a)
Time
ry./ Hi
\l -ey-11 1*00
ptJ.l22.O
IZ -
0X0Q
12 -ttf-fl
FRONT-HALF RINSES:
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 - mLs Acetone (B) : l0?-*4
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
• Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)^ _
Combined Blank = ( OWa,ter Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B)) / (A + B) •*"* JZT. ma/mL
COMMENTS
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
C 58
-------
C.4.2 Kiln Condensible PM
C 59
-------
C GO
-------
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES, INC.
PHONE 615/546-1335
FAX 615/546-7209
LABORATORY REPORT
S. Szydlo
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
Sample Received:
Report Date:
Purchase Order #:
12/06/93
12/21/93
011064
Sample ID
Lab ID
Analysis
Results
1019
E-3337 Volume Received 198 mis.
pH 2.52
Aqueous Layer me 1.40 mg.
Aqueous Layer mr 164.7 mg.
Aqueous Layer mi 168.1 mg.
Organic Layer mo N.A.
CPM = (mo+mi-mc) 166.7 mg.
1020 E-3338 Volume Received
pH
Aqueous Layer me
Aqueous Layer mr
Aqueous Layer mi
Organic Layer mo
CPM = (mo+mi-mc)
211
1.91
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
54.8
54.8
mis.
mg.
mg.
2019 E-3339 Volume Received
pH
Aqueous Layer me
Aqueous Layer mr
Aqueous Layer mi
Organic Layer mo
CPM = (mo+mi-mc)
233
2.55
1.53
181.7
184.9
N.A.
183.4
mis.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
2020
E-3340 Volume Received 191
pH 2.56
Aqueous Layer me N.A.
Aqueous Layer mr N.A.
Aqueous Layer mi N.A.
Organic Layer mo 15.3
CPM = (mo+mi-mc) 15.3
C 61
mis.
mg.
mg.
Page 1 of 2
LETTER AND SHIPMENTS BY U S. MAIL— P.O. BOX 51610. KNOXVILLE, TN 37950-1610. OTHER CARRIERS —2323 SYCAMORE DR.. KNOXVILLE. TN 37921-175(
-------
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES, INC,
PHONE 615/546-1335 FAX 615/546-7209
LABORATORY REPORT
S. Szydlo/Midwest Research Institute
Sample ID Lab ID Analysis
3019 E-3341 Volume Received
PH
Aqueous Layer me
Aqueous Layer mr
Aqueous Layer mi
Organic Layer mo
CPM = (mo+mi-mc)
3020 E-3342 Volume Received
PH
Aqueous Layer me
Aqueous Layer mr
Aqueous Layer mi
Organic Layer mo
CPM = (mo+mi-mc)
1066A E-3343 Volume Received
Results
230
2.61
0.47
159.5
162.3
N.A.
161.8 -
212
2.60
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
10.4
10.4
115
1
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mg.
mis.
1066B
E-3344
Volume Received
110
mis.
me = 0.0205 x cone. SOA mg/ml x mis. of sample
mi = mr x
vol. of sample
volume of sample - mis. aliquot taken
for SO,
Authorized Release of Data:
Project Manager
CM:sla
C 62
LETTER AND SHIPMENTS BY U.S. MAIL — P.O. BOX 51610, KNOXVILLE. TN 37950-1610, OTHER CARRIERS —2323 SYCAMORE DR., KNOXVILLE. TN 37921-175
-------
C.4.3 Kiln Multiple Metals/PM
C 63
-------
C - 64
-------
FILTER PARTICTJLATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No. • 460i.01.05.01 Client: EPA - Emission Inventory Branch (EIB)
Sampling Location: Kiln Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, Ohio
Analyst: Szydlo
-3-to
Filter samples hoatad at 160" C f
weight. »'
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No. finfrt/t-/ Filter No..
Gross Wt. (q) /> 0
;, desiccated, and weighed to a constantx"
Gross Wt.(g) /.
Gross Wt. (q) /,
Gross Wt.(q) A
* Sample No. t
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kiln
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
-I Beaker No.
Sample No. 1 06
. 6
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt. (g) j2 (o2.
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : .2/4- $
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B)) / (A + B) =
0.0
It,
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (g) <92>• (?.26 7 /Z ~O2-
Gross Wt. (q) <42 . 6,2, £ ? "
Gross Wt.(g)_
Gross Wt.(g).
Time
1 ?>D0
I 3
i? -tj I
, do 37 mg/mL
COMMENTS:
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No. Mrl5-J, Beaker No.
Sample No .
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (g) 1(13. 70(>lj )2-02-\
Gross Wt. (g) (0 ~3 . 7063 "
Gross Wt. (g) ID 3.
0,0 Gross Wt. (a) /a 3. 7
Time
J2. If
J_
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt. (g) \Q2.6
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B) : 3. ^ 3, 7
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (q) 103. 7 OCs6
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (q) //y 3.^7 35"
Combined Blank = ((Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B))/(A + B) = a.
-------
BLANKS (FRONT-HALF PARTICULATE MATTER) ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01 Client: EPA/Emission Measurement Branch
Sampling Location: Kiln Facility: Belden Brick, Sugar Creek. OH
Analyst: Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight. Filters heated at
105° C for 2-3 hours, desiccated, and weighed to a constant weight.
ACETONE BLANK DETERMINATION: Run No. (s) -. /I rt - / Beaker No. fifl * I") 4. Sample No.
Acetone Volume Evaporated: Beaker + Evaporated Acetone Residue Weights:
Date Time
Beaker + Acetone Wt . (g) 2£ ?- *- Gross Wt . (g) lift . 39 $2
Beaker Tare Wt. (g) lib* Vtffrj/Gross Wt. (g) if 6.
Acetone Wt. (g) ^8- 8 Gross Wt. (a) //I. 3 1*1
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (A) : / 88 ' > 5$ Gross Wt. (q) H(,, 3
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for blank determination (q) lit,
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (q) //£
Net Wt.(B), Residue in Beaker (q) • OOO7
Acetone Blank (B x 1000/A) :
-------
Interoffice Communication
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
March 14, 1994
To: R. Morenshaw cc. R. Neulicht
A. Carender
From: A. Mainey—i^S^A
Re: Metals analysis Summary for the EIB Emissions Test at Plant 6 Belden
Brick Company in Sugarcreek, Ohio (Project No. 4601-01-05-04)
INTRODUCTION
The Emissions Inventory Branch (EIB) emissions test for the Belden Brick kiln required metals
analysis of the kiln stack gases. These samples were digested using Method 29 and SW-846
methods as specified in the Draft Test Plan, dated October 22, 1993.
A total of eleven metals are reported as analyzed in the stack gas samples received from the
emissions test (Reference Tables 1 and 2). All data were obtained using CVAA (for Hg) and
ICP-AES for all other analytes.
SAMPLE PREPARATION METHODS
The stack gas samples and blank reagents from the emissions test at the Belden brick kiln were
digested using Draft Method 29 as indicated in the Draft Test Plan. Boric acid addition was not
utilized as specified in the Test Plan, since the ICP was fitted with a Hydrofluoric acid (HF)
resistant inlet system prior to analysis. The boric addition was previously used to allow ICP
analysis without risk of damaging (HF etching) the torch.
In addition, the front-half filter, probe rinse and back-half impinger samples were digested and
analyzed separately as requested by the program manager. The flow chart presented in the test
plan (page 5-15) designates that these FH and BH samples are proportionally combined and then
analyzed.
Further digestion was performed for mercury (Hg) in the stackgas samples using SW-846
Method 7470. This method was slightly modified in order to allow sufficient digest volume for
multimetals analysis by ICP.
C 68
-------
STACK GAS ANALYSIS
Multiple metals analysis was performed on a Thermo-Jarrell Ash Model 61EICP-AES and Hg
was analyzed using a PSA Merlin Plus Mercury Analyzer. Analysis methods utilized for
multiple metals and mercury are SW-846 Methods 601OA and 7470, respectively. Each
instrument was calibrated and verified using a calibration check standard (from an alternate
supplier), prior to analysis of stackgas samples. In addition, method continuing calibration
standards and blanks were routinely analyzed to verify calibration of the instrument.
An HF resistant inlet system to the ICP was utilized for the analysis of front-half digests
containing HF, in order to prevent damage to the standard inlet system of the ICP.
Quarterly instrumental detection limits (IDL's) for each analytical system were utilized during
these analyses. The quarterly IDLs are determined from seven analyses of a low standard on
three non-consecutive days.
METALS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Tables 1 and 2 present metals analysis results for the Belden Brick emissions test. There was
a discrepancy between the traceability records and the identifier on the samples. Results are
reported using the identifier on the actual samples.
The method blanks are used for monitoring potential laboratory contribution during processing
and analysis. Levels of analytes in the method blank were beneath the detection limit for most
analytes. The few analytes detected were close to the detection limit (i.e. less than
approximately 2 times the MDL).
Reagent blanks were also analyzed to monitor potential for contribution from reagent supplies
and equipment used in sample collection. All backhalf and Hg impinger reagents were detected
near or less than the instrumental DL. Results for the filter and acetone rinse reagent blanks
were detected near concentrations found in the train samples. These levels, as reported in Table
1 (1056/MMBIR. Blanks) were not expected. Available historical data for the front-half reagent
blank results were faxed to you on March 10, 1994 to provide background information.
INSTRUMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL
Instrument calibration was verified using multielement standards obtained from an alternate
supplier than those used for calibration. In addition, all correlation coefficient requirements were
met per the analytical method. Instrumental drift was monitored throughout each analysis at less
than 7% for all analytes (method criteria is ±10% from target). All initial calibration
verification analyses met SW-846 Method 6010A and Method 7470 criteria and were within 5%
from the target concentration (method criteria is ±10% from target).
C 69
-------
In addition, the interference check standard results (ICP only) were within the limits set by
Method 6010A (method criteria is ±20% from target). Serial dilution tests were not required
per Method 6010A, due to the low levels in the resulting digest by ICP.
METHOD QUALITY CONTROL
Method quality control results are reported in Table 3 (for ICP analytes) and Table 5 (for Hg).
Accuracy was monitored using spiked laboratory reagents (LCS), recoveries ranged 93% to
111 % (criteria is 70 - 130%). Further accuracy was monitored using a front-half representative
NIST filter containing certified levels of Cd, Mn and Pb. The resulting front-half recoveries
ranged 70% to 110%, with the exception of Pb, which was at a target level below ICP detection
capability.
Precision, based on duplicate samples were not a requirement for this work, based on QA/QC
objectives in the Draft test plan. However, precision was monitored for Hg analysis, results for
duplicate analysis were less than 5% relative percent difference.
GENERAL SUMMARY
Metals analyses were performed for all samples from the Belden Brick kiln stack gases for the
Emissions Inventory Branch. These results as reported in appended Tables, met all QA/QC
objectives in the test plan. One difficulty is noted; results for the filter/acetone reagent blank
had higher levels than expected, for most analytes. These levels are near those reported for the
stackgas samples.
C 70
-------
O)
5
O_
c
S£
£-g
<• o
o (^
o *5?
•OQ!
-s u
•<» o- T^ —
O CN J2 uj
SJI5
o
3
v>
D
JS
O
2
o
to
«/>
^£
y
ac
co
*
0
m
j
lf
Jl
8
. •!•
•l
«O
sssss
sssss
•O
I
at
it
O
8
3252
0«
s
S88
CO
«0
B
"5
o
Ji
>
--
• -
.
11
125
.v<«g
-------
a
o
coo
I
to
.^-
4
I
«/»
o
i
SI 3:
JL
•* c
•£ .2
«s
l
Mill
i
at
n
r?-?!
sss
r
ee
eo .
ss
_
SSIS
83
tf)
sss
-------
O oo
— UJ
c*o<
CN -O (X
.= •0-3
Jf3
•B^S
Ui
1*1
S-S |
a-rl
« C "Si
£ < .£
.5!
O
CO
CO
Of
CO
O
a
UJ
ca
a
o
V)
CO
-o
o
a.
u
ti^ii
ct < O «
,0
^ J
D 3
E S
E a
J? u
U O
° 1
._« C
0 o
iS it
ca
00 OO
s §
s
,§9
00^
•
IT) Q
O O ^
oo >o
•".-•o
S 2
OO
CO O
o
n o oo
00-
^00
^i rv n
_ _
O O —
-i*
•5.
CO
co co
UU
— K.
en -^ i
06 K O
V
*22
OO
oil
O
V
o-o
CN
ee
U
O
**.
o
o
03
00?
«*Vi«3
*XY .?x~?.
3>«\
CO O
CO O «O
IT) ^-
13
C
o
3
1
(U
_c
i
J8
"1
V
a>
"5.
E
g
D
a>
1
T3
_C
;
+
—
O
u.
. — .
^
CM
•?
o
u~
*"~
"0
3
o
u_
II
Q
a.
a:
•
1
4)
'5.
CO
CO
y
^x
-a
c
3
O
U-
CO
y
u
V
I
u
IV
ot
CO
U
C 73
-------
-•*?
1-
«/>
IU
&
at
oa
|
IU
m
-0 —
it j.
•= *
i? <
1 & *
<-£ S
O O *"
Ix 5 »•
2 "* ^
^ >-
-P = 3
3 S 1
3^ - i
5 s S- X
3KU?^ =
oo .c — O ca
^ Ii — 0 £ "5
" 5 £0 | §
1? 3 ° .. 52 £
o a. •• v .C "-
5 fc. £ 1 5 "S
HM? i
™ C C C •} B
siii^ 4
i I 111 S
e
n
i
J
o fr
-«• o-O
9 g * §
8 | o I
•~ g "• M "»
si* : 8
!=J?i -
•fa e < •c c. uj
liiii i
P- "*'•*
Yt ^
'&?&$<.''
»V' ^ <,
,^ ^sV
^ %v^» sfc
1^4
-iff
V-X- < s
% * ^
&• •. ja
III
*?A*JS#
»iXx -''
^ -.^
.'^JrtS*v^
s*'/r
' *" X" 7°
V*.
^v" % *
\ f
:
cH
2
?
-»
•
2
y
CO
as
o
^
^
W
.2
S)
I
a
•>
2
M
^
3
ac
0
_:
o>
o-
o
!
^
CO
o-
s
CO
o
•o
o
d
J
tc
o
JJ
^«
0)
.a
S
5
"I _
i I
s 1 1
a. s -s
C O) *[
S "6^
y 4*1*
o 1-f
^ ^ .§ §
0 0 |^
J? E —
E o o
0^-!.=
11 l-i^
-• — ~ *~
" _g -a .
"S- -R S
E-? § g
2 2^i"S
-o „ o tS
3-ijo
c R « £
Jj O V 4)
g o r «
g. 8 J °-
S -H 2
•5^ pJ
— g * Ti
|- E«
•J »o
2 « .2s eu
O V TJ oc
CO * I •
C 74
-------
C.4.4 Kiln Semivolatile Organic Compounds
C 75
-------
C . 76
-------
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
January 5, 1994
To: R. Marinshaw
From: W. Whitacre
Subject: Results of Semivolatile Analysis, EIB, Belden Brick
Emission Test, MRI PRoject No. 4601-01
This memo describes the analysis for semivolatile organic
analytes in samples collected from the Belden Brick, Kiln.
Supporting information is attached to this memo in tabular
format.
SAMPLE RECEIPT
Samples were received on November 15, 1993, the samples were
stored at 4°C prior to extraction. Reagent blanks were received
with the MM5 samples. These blanks were archived in the cold
room.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
The MM5 samples were extracted according to EPA SW-846
Method 0010. The extractions were started on November 16, 1993
and GC/MS analysis completed on December 1, 1993. All holding
times were met for extraction and analysis.
For the MM5 samples, the XAD/filter were combined, fortified
with the 8270 Base/Neutral and Acid surrogate spiking mix, and
Soxhlet-extracted with methylene chloride (Method 3540). The
front half rinse, back half rinse, and condensate were combined
in a separatory funnel and extracted with methylene chloride
(Method 3510). The two extracts were combined and concentrated
using Kuderna-Danish and nitrogen evaporation to a volume of
10 mL. The samples were split, 5 mL for archive and 5 mL were
further concentrated to 1 mL.
Three additional samples labeled filter support rinse were
collected in the field. These rinses were spiked with the
surrogate spiking mixes and concentrated by Kuderna-Danish and
nitrogen evaporation to 10 mL. The samples were split, 5 mL for
archive and 5 mL were further concentrated to l mL.
The samples were analyzed by quadruple gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), on the TRIO-1A using a
C 77
-------
DB-5 60-m column according to SW-846 Method 8270, Two of the MM5
sample trains were diluted. Run 1 was injected twice for a
duplicate injection.
RESULTS
The results of the semivolatile analysis and the surrogate
recoveries of the MM5 and filter support rinse samples are
presented in Tables 1 and 2. Detection limits are based upon the
concentration of the lowest calibration standard. All surrogate
recoveries meet the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPjP)
objective of 50 to 150 percent for the MM5 samples. During the
analysis of the filter support rinses, the internal standard
areas decreased by a factor of three. This is attributed to
sample matrix effects since the extracts were a black color with
visible particles suspended in the solvent. The lower internal
standard areas affected the surrogate recoveries and the majority
were outside the method objective. These samples could be
subject to cleanup (e.g., Florisil or GPC) and reanalyzed to
improve surrogate recovery and internal standard response. This
additional work is outside the scope of this project.
During the extraction of the XAD/filter samples, a XAD
method blank, 28425, and one XAD QA spike, 00482, were also
extracted. A water QA spike, 00483, was extracted with the
condensate samples. The method blank contained five compounds.
A Performance Audit Sample (PAS), 00481, provided by D. Hooton
was analyzed by GC/MS. The results and surrogate recoveries of
the blank and QA samples were given in Tables 3 and 4. Both the
PAS and the spikes met the objective of 50 to 150 percent.
QUALITY CONTROL
For the initial calibration curve analyzed on October 25,
1993, all CCC's and SPCC's passed Method criteria. Two analytes
were greater than 30 percent REF (Benzidine at 42 percent and
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine at 30.1 percent).
All CCC's and SPCC's for the CCAL (continuing calibration
check) analyzed on November 30, 1993 passed Method criteria.
Four analytes were greater than 30 percent difference from the
initial calibration curve (benzoic acid at 47 percent,
2,4-dinitrophenol at 30.3 percent, 3,'dichlorobenzidine at
30.1 percent, and benzidine at 86 percent).
All CCC's and SPCC's for the CCAL (continuing calibration
check) analyzed on December 1, 1993 passed Method criteria. One
analyte was greater than 30 percent difference from the initial
calibration curve (benzidine at 62 percent).
The method blank contained four compounds, three of which
were also found in the samples. The amounts in the blank are
lower than the samples. The compounds and amounts in the blank
are: benzoic acid 64 jug, naphthalene 3.1 /*g, 2-hydroxyace-
C 78
-------
TABLE 1. SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS (ug)
Analyte
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(1 -Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
Run
1
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.8
<2
<2
2.1
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
6
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.8
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
1 Rl
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.8
<2
<2
2.2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
6
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.9
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
2
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
4.9
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
12
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
11
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
3
8.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
9.7
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
623
<2
<2
<2
<2
8.5
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
7.4
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
10383
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
20383
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
30383
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
C 79
-------
TABLE 1. SEMIVOLATILE RESULTS (continued)
Analyte
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Garbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Run
1
<2
53
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
13
<2
<2
<2
2
<2
<2
<2
77
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
1 Rl
<2
53
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
13
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
77
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
2
<2
23
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
14
<2
<2
<2
2.2
<2
<2
<2
240
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Run
3
<2
18
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
31
<2
<2
<2
3
<2
<2
<2
510
10
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
10383
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
20383
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
3038a
(a)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
(a) These samples are filtered support rises. The extracts were
matrix interfered with analysis. The internal standard areas
recovery did not meet objectives.
black and the sample
were low and surrogate
C 80
-------
Ao
ov
w
o
u
M
3
RROGATE
t>
CO
*
cs
w
EH
Q
H
w
i-H
ft
§
co
3038A I
2038A
1038A
ro
I
CN
1
H
H
C
£
H
1
0)
4J
>i
rH
id
c
«!
id
CN
m
id
cn
CN
id
rH
m
vo
CN
[--
in
r-
in
CU
0)
N
C
0)
XI
0
^_l
o
rH
r]
U
-•H
Q
CN
t
rH
1
*4*
Q
vo
in
id
vo
r-
vo
m
r-
,_i
vo
m
vo
0)
C
cu
N
C
cu
X)
0
I i
-H
£5
i
in
a
id
in
cn
id
0
M
CO
m
co
vo
in
CN
vo
CN
VO
rH
O
c
cu
rj
ft
0
O
i-H
Ec<
i
CN
id
o
H
id
m
i-H
id
n
rH
CO
VO
in
r-
rH
vo
o
rH
0
a
cu
X!
04
1
vo
D
id
CO
id
id
vo
r-
vo
H
H
vo
o
vo
rH
O
G
0)
X!
ft
O
^
0
H
r]
U
(N
i
t^
D
id
o
in
VD
id
CO
CN
in
id
o
CN
CN
CO
H
H
H
H
in
rH
H
VO
O
rH
rH
O
c
cu
ft
0
E
0
XI
-H
EH
i
vo
«.
^
^
CN
s
U
^1
CU
ft
-H
to
4J
*
O
in • cu
rH TJrH
4J -H id
&ta
in cu a)
w J3
MH 4-1
°§0
•H 0)
4J to 3
o ra T3
0) CU
-l-li-H 0)
X) H
o to id
id
to
Q)
0)-iH
4J CQ JJ
0) G rH
g O 3
ft u
4J W -H
0) CU MH
cu ^ IM
•O
O
o id CD
C T) 10
a a)
O id x!
Q W EH
id ca
C 81
-------
TABLE 3. SEMIVOLATILE QA RESULTS (ug)
Analyte
Phenol
Aniline
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
2,2'-oxybis(1 -Chloropropane)
4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic acid
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2-Chloroacetophenone
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Hydroxyacetophenone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenone
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
Method
blank
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
64
<2
<2
<2
<2
3.1
<2
<2
<2
<2
3.2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
00481
308
<2
<2
316
597
615
597
589
<2
<2
5.3
<2
592
584
584
320
337
<2
<2
<2
331
606
326
<2
<2
617
323
<2
554
607
350
<2
604
<2
<2
360
662
<2
<2
337
200
289
574
Percent
recovery
92
95
90
92
90
88
89
88
88
96
101
99
91
98
93
97
83
91
105
91
108
99
101
60
87
86
00482
39
<2
<2
39
76
79
77
74
<2
<2
<2
<2
71
80
86
43
15
85
<2
<2
<2
82
46
<2
<2
82
49
<2
81
42
54
<2
93
<2
<2
59
128
<2
<2
57
<2
57
104
Percent
recovery
58
58
57
59
57
55
53
60
64
64
22
65
61
69
61
73
60
3
81
70
88
96
85
0
85
78
00483
10
<2
<2
22
34
36
29
35
<2
<2
<2
<2
30
46
50
23
17
<2
<2
<2
24
41
24
<2
<2
37
25
<2
45
18
27
<2
51
<2
<2
31
58
<2
<2
29
167
9
56
Percent
recovery
30
67
50
55
45
54
45
70
76
71
52
74
62
71
56
77
68
27
83
76
94
88
88
5
27
85
C 82
-------
TABLE 3. SEMIVOLATILE QA RESULTS (continued)
Analyte
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Fluorene
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Benzidine
Pyrene
Butylbenzyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoroanthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Method
blank
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
17
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
00481
632
<2
<2
354
<2
280
<2
<2
620
365
345
339
<2
<2
358
<2
342
<2
<2
314
292
<2
<2
352
318
336
332
352
265
Percent
recovery
95
106
84
93
110
104
102
108
103
94
88
106
95
101
100
106
80
00482
128
<2
<2
67
<2
19
<2
<2
119
38
66
63
<2
<2
71
<2
69
<2
<2
62
58
14
<2
73
63
59
62
65
49
Percent
recovery
96
100
29
89
57
99
94
106
103
93
87
109
94
88
93
97
73
00483
58
<2
<2
33
<2
21
<2
<2
63
29
32
31
<2
<2
35
<2
35
<2
<2
30
28
<2
<2
31
29
27
28
29
22
Percent
recovery
88
100
65
95
88
97
92
106
105
90
86
92
89
82
85
88
70
C 83
-------
TABLE 4. QA SURROGATE RECOVERY, %
Analyte
D4 - 1 , 2 -Dichlorobenzene
D5 - Nitrobenzene
2 - Fluorobiphenyl
D14 - 4 - Terphenyl
2 - Fluorophenol
D6- Phenol
D4 - 2 - Chlorophenol
2,4,6- Tr ibromophenol
Sample ID
Method
blank
51
55
60
100
49a
51
50
67
00482
56
62
73
93
49a
54
52
98
00483
45A
67
66
67
41a
27a
60
92
not meet method objective of 50 to 150 percent.
C 84
-------
tophenone 3.2 /xg, and bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate 17 /*g, benzole
acid is found Run 3 at 623 jug, naphthalene--Runs 1 through 3 at 6
to 12 /xg, and bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Runs 1 through 3 at 77
to 510 /ig. Benzole acid and bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate were
found in the XAD spike sample 00482.
C 85
-------
C 86
-------
C.4.5 Kiln Volatile Organic Compounds
C 87
-------
C 88
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION
To: Rick Marinshaw and Roy Neulicht Date: December 20, 1993
From: Margie St. Germain
Subject: EIB Brick Kiln, VOST Analysis Report, Project No. 4601-0105-02
The quantitation data for the submitted samples from the EIB Brick Kiln are attached.
As indicated in the test plan, dated October 22, 1993, SW-846 Method 5041 was
followed using the target analyte listing from SW-846 Method 8240. The method
objectives listed in Sections 7.16 and 7.17 were met, except for those objectives that
appear as footnotes on the attached data forms. All supporting raw data are
organized according to analysis dates, are stored in Room 300-W, and are ready for
archival.
The following chronological listing is a summary of key events that affect the data
reporting and quality.
1. Roy Neulicht approved three requested method changes on October 29, 1993.
a. Bromoform does not have to meet the method objective of the minimum
average relative response factor (RRF) of 0.250. The average RRF for
bromoform on the Tenax/charcoal traps was 0.193 for the calibration curve.
All other standards met the minimum RRF for bromoform.
b. Standards from a previous project were available for use so that costs for
EIB could be reduced. One client-requested compound (1,2-dichloroethene)
was not in the standard. We reviewed data for indications of the presence of
1,2-dichloroethene and did not find any in the field samples.
c. d6-Benzene was substituted for d4-Benzene.
2. Samples were received on November 15, 1993, in good condition. Eleven trap
pairs were received, including two field blank pairs, two trip blank pairs, and
seven sample pairs.
3. The 48-hour preliminary report was waived due to instrument difficulties, as
discussed with Roy Neulicht on November 16, 1993. Roy Neulicht and Rick
Marinshaw were briefed on the project status on a daily basis.
4. Tenax calibration curve was extended with two standards on November 18, 1993,
and two more standards on November 19, 1993. The purpose was to bracket the
MRI.AVM4SOI.Q1
C 89
-------
high levels of benzene in the samples. The addition of calibration points to the
curve for high level samples is allowed by Method 5041.
5. The preliminary results for Sample 1069 were facsimiled to Rick Marinshaw for
review on November 19, 1993. The results for the sample were comparable to
the previous studies, as discussed with Rick Marinshaw on November 19, 1993.
6. As discussed with Rick Marinshaw on November 20, 1993, the benzene results
on the Tenax traps ranged from 1,048 ng to 25,800 ng (est.). The remaining
analyte amounts on the Tenax traps were reproducible. Rick indicated that we
will not be analyzing the remaining samples.
7. Sample 1073 contained very high levels of benzene and the instrument detector
was saturated. The benzene result should be considered a minimum value.
8. Since the Tenax samples contained high levels of analytes, several system
blanks were required to ensure that the analytical system was free of sample
contamination.
9. Sample analyses were completed on November 23, 1993; all analyses were
performed within the 14-day holding time.
Assessment of Data Quality
The method was followed and the objectives were met except for the following:
1. Chloromethane, bromomethane, and iodomethane were observed in the system
blank samples. The source of the contamination was identified as the methanol
which was used to prepare the internal standard solution and the internal
standard/surrogate solution. Chloromethane was observed in the samples at
10 times the amount found in the system blanks. Bromomethane was observed
in the samples at the same level or below that found in the system blank.
Iodomethane was not required by the client.
2. The calibration curve ranged from 20 ng to 3,000 ng for the Tenax trap analysis,
with an extension for benzene up to 15,000 ng. Four compounds (chloro-
methane, bromomethane, 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, and methylene chloride)
did not meet the calibration curve objective of 30% RSD.
The calibration curve ranged from 20 ng to 1,000 ng for the Tenax/charcoal trap
curve. Eight compounds (Chloromethane, bromomethane, dichlorodifluoro-
methane, methylene chloride, carbon disulfide, benzene, 1,1,2-trichloroethane,
and chloroethane) did not meet the 30% RSD objective.
MRI-A\M4601-01
-------
All values below 20 ng are considered estimates.
3. Two additional standards with benzene and internal standards were analyzed in
order to quantitate the high level of benzene in one sample. Since the benzene
peak was saturated in these two standards, the average response factor was not
calculated for these two points. The calibration standards were used to estimate
the level of benzene found in the sample using a single point calibration.
4. A high bias was observed in the performance audit samples (PAS) for several
analytes.
For the Tenax trap analysis, three compounds (carbon tetrachloride, c/s-1,3-
dichloropropene, and frans-1,3-dichloropropene) did not meet the 70% to 130%
objective listed in the project plan. As discussed with D. Hooton, the analysis
proceeded since it was a screening analysis for emission factors. These three
analytes were not observed in the samples.
For the Tenax/charcoal trap analysis, five compounds in one PAS and eight
compounds in a second PAS did not meet the 70% to 130% objective listed in
the project plan. The results for the two PAS were consistent with each other.
The affected compounds were 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, trans-1,2-
dichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloropropane, c/s-1,3-
dichloropropene, dibromochloromethane, and frans-1,3-dichloropropene. The
results were discussed with D. Hooton on November 24, 1993. These
compounds were not observed in the samples.
The attached data are organized into four sections.
A. Sample Receipt
B. Quality Control Sample Data: Tenax Only
C. Quality Control Sample Data: Tenax/Charcoal
D. Sample Data
MRI-AVM4601-01
C 91
-------
4601-01-05-02
VOST Sample Receipt
MRI-A\M4«01-01
Q 92
-------
D CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
GETSAMPLE TRACEABILITY RECORD
HnntainAr (Cooler) No VoST^
Page / Of / Transfer No.
Checked by (Initials)/Da(e
Lock or Seal Intact (Yes or No)/Time
_ 1047 1068 . 1069 f
Pr 1 Tnx / Pr 1 T/C ^ Pr 2 Tnx /
4601-01 V 4601-01 4601-01
1070 . 1071 , 1072
Pr 2 T/C ,/ Pr 3 Tnx / Pr 3 T/C /
4601-01 v 4601-01 Wl-01
1073 1074 1075
Pr 4 Tnx / Pr 4 T/C ./ Fd fl Tnx , /
4601-01 v 4601-01 v 4601-01 v
1 fl7A Irt77 . M7o
Fd B T/C / Tr B Tnx v Tr B T/C •/
4601-01 4601-01 4601-01
70A7 w/ ^/uo ^ 7rtiO
/uo/ v ^068 y' _ /06y /•
Pr 1 Tnx Pr 1 T/C ^ Pr 2 Tnx ^ &C7 jzJ't' sr»~f>S<:J^
/ri>ft.; Sj*>/rJel #0'73S-20'74-
3rt, >/"P>» Av -^-»J^/i>»^ jf"opft3f
2-f'j-tr' *7 £% ^a->f.
Relinquished By: Received By:
dfak^j^/ /x^^y
/ ' * f ' /) ^~
Field Sample Custodian:
(_/3^r»^/ ^6*f?*1^*^
,/
Remarks:
I/
Remarks:
t/
Remarks:
I/
Remata:
i/
Remarks:
»/
Remarks:
i/
Remarks:
I/
Remarks:
Remarks:
*/ ' -Qj
Remarks:
Remarks:
Sample Transfers:
Date Time No.
1 ///$fa ^ tf^Jd 1
2
3
"4
Storage Requirements:
fja^ce water. < 4°C
O Dry ice
CD Room Temp., < 26°C
CD Other:
Reason for Transfer:
O
93-* SEV surmwksm 02
-------
Code: CS-2
Revision: 0
Date: 12/03S1
Page: 5 of 14
SAMPLE RECEIPT CHECKLIST
MRI Project No.4bOl-CM-OS
Instructions are on the back of the checklist.
Samples Received by. l£r^ UFAJRY' Date:H.
Airbill No. /o / A. Chain-of-Custody No. Nif
Yes/No . -. .
Y 1. Is the shipping container intact?
What kind of container is it?
Chain-of-custody form present? Record number above.
Chain-of-custody form property filled out? :
Airbill present? Record number above.
A 5. Were samples under some kind of custody seal?
What kind of custody seals were used:
a. Bottle sealed?
b. Bag sealed?
c. Cooler sealed?
d. Other? Specify,
If there are custody seal numbers verify them versus the chain-of-custody form or if
they are not on the form, record them on the form or versus the sample number.
tijfX 6. Were the custody seals intact?
Y 7. All sample containers intact, none broken or leaking?
X 8. Does the chain-of-custody form or sample inventory indicate the type of sample and the
sample container? If not indicate on the form or below.
Y 9. Ice packs or ice still frozen? v':
If no, are samples still cold? Contact project leader to see if the sample
temperature needs to be measured.
Y 10. All samples on chain-of-custody form, sample inventory, or packing list accounted for?
Do the actual sample labels or tags match all the paperwork? If not describe on the
form or below any discrepancies by listing the numbers on the containers versus the
numbers on the chain-of-custody form.
Y 11. Sample labels permanently affixed? If not affix the label permanently.
JLJ2. Did y°u sign, date, and complete all areas of every form received with the samples?
>f 13. Did you store samples as indicated by the project leader?
A 14. Did you indicate where samples are stored on the chain-of-custody form?
COMMENTS AND ANY REMARKS AS SPECIRED ABOVE:
— 7f\\ Fs AMP) CUfrMAwS TO T?faA.r> "Zf^fc I t-t4.t
Attach any additional pages needed for comments.
MW-AV2S310.SOP
5 M.
iz-14-^5
r Q /\
-------
Code: CS-2
Revision: 0
Date: 12103/91
Page: 6 of 14
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Fill in the form completely. For areas where a Yes/No response is not applicable, mark the
area "N/A".
2. Wherever possible indicate all problems on the chain-of-custody form or sample inventory.
Any negative answer to the questions should be explained If there is not enough room on
the chain-of-custody form, write the explanations on this form and attach any additional
sheets needed.
3. Check off each sample received on the sample inventory or chain-of-custody form. If there
is not a client-supplied inventory, generate an inventory by listing:
a. Shipper.
b. Sample type.
c. Sample shipping container.
d. Sample container.
e. Each sample name with the information on the sample label.
4. Indicate on the chain-of-custody form where samples are stored.
5. If there are any problems that affect the integrity of the sample (e.g., unsigned chain-of-
custody form, chain-of-custody form in error, mislabeted samples, broken samples,
contaminated samples, leaking samples, etc.), tell the project leader immediately. The
sample custodian or project leader must
a. Inform the dient immediately.
b. Take any action indicated by dient
c. Document the action in a telephone contact report and telefax the report that day
to the dient.
d. File the phone contact report in the sample receipt file.
6. Create a sample receipt file. Place this form, accompanying comments, the packing list,
chain-of-custody forms, the airbill, and any phone contact reports in the sample receipt file.
Within one working day, deliver the sample receipt file to the document control officer.
M«-A\ZS310.SOP
95
-------
To:
From:
Subject:
November 11, 1993
M. St. Germain, M., Whitacre, A. Mainey
R. Marinshaw
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTTT
Sun
401 Harrison Oaks Boul
Gary. North Carolina 27513
Telephone (919) 677
FAX (919) 677
Request for Analysis of Samples From Belden Brick
Emission Test
MRI Project No. 4601-01
Under EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0159, Work Assignment I-01, an
emission test was conducted at the Belden Brick Company Plant
No. 6, Sugarcreek, Ohio, during the week of November 8, 1993.
The attached tables list all of the samples and analyses
required. Please refer to the site-specific test plan, dated
October 22, 1993, for a detailed description of the test
locations, test methods, and QA requirements for the test.
Please take note that the complete charge numbers for this
emission test are as follows:
Field test
VOST analysis
Semi-VOST analysis
Metals analysis
QA/QC
Reporting
1.0 PARTICULATE MATTER
4601-01-05-01
4601-01-05-02
4601-01-05-03
4601-01-05-04
4601-01-05-05
4601-01-05-06
Three Method 201A runs were conducted on the inlet to the
baghouse for the grinding/screening room, and two Method 201A
runs were conducted on the outlet to the grinding/screening room
fabric filter. These samples are to be analyzed for PM less than
or equal to 10 micrometers (/zm) and PM greater than 10 pm. In
addition, Hi-Vol samplers were used to sample ambient PM-10
inside the grinding/screening room (three runs) and outside the
grinding/screening room (three runs on the east side and two runs
on the west side) . The Hi-Vol filters must be analyzed for two
runs at each of the three locations.
The kiln was sampled .for PM emissions using three sampling
trains. Three Method 201/202 runs were conducted. These samples
must be analyzed for PM less than or equal to 10 /*m, PM greater
than 10 urn, condensible inorganic PM, and condensible organic PM.
Three Method 26A runs were conducted, and the samples from this
train must be analyzed for filterable PM. Finally, three Method
0029 runs were conducted. The samples from these runs must' also
be analyzed for filterable PM. Please note that the filters for
the Method 201A train are to be weighed, heated to 320°F, and
reweighed. Table 1 summarizes the PM samples from the
grinding/screening room and kiln that must be analyzed.
C 96
-------
3.0 VOST
The kiln was sampled for volatile organic compounds using a
Method 0030 (VOST) sampling train. Three runs were conducted.
Trap pairs 2, 4, and 6 must be analyzed according to Method 8240
for the compounds listed in Figure 5-9 of the test plan. In
addition, one pair of field blank traps and one pair of trip
blank traps must be analyzed. There was no VOST condensate.
Table 3 summarizes the VOST samples for analysis.
TABLE 3. VOST SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS
Sample
Sample
Kiln Stack—Method 0030 (VOST)
Pair 1 Tnx
Pair 1 T/C
Pair 2 Tnxa
Pair 2 T/Ca
Pair 3 Tnx
Pair 3 T/C
Pa*: 4 Tnx3
Pair 4 T/Ca
Pair 5 Tnx
Pair 5 T/C
Pair 6 Tnxa
Pair 6 T/Ca
Pair 7 Tnx
Pair 7 T/C
Field blank Tnx13
Field blank T/C13
Trip blank Tnx13
Trip blank T/C13
Field blank Tnx13
Field blank T/C13
Trip blank Tnx13
Trip blank T/C15
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
1075
1076
1077
1078
2075
2076
2077
2078
C 97
-------
*Trap pairs 2, 4 and 6 to be analyzed.
bOne pair of field and trip blanks to be analyzed.
4.0 Semi-VOST
The kiln was sampled for semi-volatile organic compounds
using a Method 0010 (semi-VOST) sampling train. Three runs were
conducted. Please note that the back half samples were split
into two fractions. The two sample fractions for Run 1 (1038 and
1038A) should be analyzed separately; for each of the other two
runs, the two fractions should be combined for the analysis. The
samples must be analyzed for the compounds listed in Figure 5-11
of the test plan. Table 4 summarizes the semi-VOST samples for
analysis.
TABLE 4. SEMI-VOST SAMPLES FOR ANALYSIS.
Sample
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Kiln Stack- -Method 0010 (semi-VOST)
Front -half rinse
Filter
Back-half rinse
Back-half rinse
XAD Cartridge #
Condensate
1036
1037
1038a
103 8Aa
1039
1040
Blanks
Methanol
Methylene chloride
XAD Cartridge #
1061
1062
1063
2036
2037
2038b
2038Ab
2039
2040
3036
3037
3038b
3038Ab
3039
3040
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
^Analyze each fraction of back half rinse sample separately,
bCombine both back half rinse sample fractions for analysis,
C 98
-------
3 21 8- '78
Project No.:
Title/Purpose:
Continued from: -j/*
Witnessed by:
Witnessed by:
- d-l
r —
Performed by (name/date):
//-it-is
Continued to: ?? /$>-?} Entered by: /^ /-/r-»j Verified by: ____ ._
Reviewed by: ^jr Validated by: ..«,rts:w
(signature/date)
(initials/date)
(initials/date)^
75 /
/7/f
10
J 7"
^^ A /*,,,,.,<.
15
20
25
2 5"
'+
-2-17)?'*'*
tTKf
/-z.
8
e f
30
ill
C 99
-------
3218- 79
{~MRI Project No.:^^/- */
-"Title/Purpose: j,,sr ~
' Continued from: 5 2/f- *?
K^itnessed by: '- -. •
Witnessed by:
• . ,.> ,
Performed by (name/date):
Continued to:
,,.,1-f} (signature/date)
Entered by:
Reviewed by:
/f-/r-i?
Verified by:
Validated by:
(initials/date)
(initials/date)
10
'1*1 T/ f ft?-, ZSC/'I) //?t*/"-7 f teis-rfC'/?) / 2? {7 f?e //<-Z-
20
tit til- j, -»/5,
A.y X»*v
. ,xsc/r>-)
.25 '
'If/I
30
//-/1-V 3
C 100
-------
-3218- 80
MRI Project No.:
Title/Purpose:
- * f Performed by (name/date): £ /?
ft*.4 ^
i i -/ »• v 3
Continued from: ?r-
-------
§
3218- 8
Project No.: *i(oi-*t
Title/Purpose: i"$r
Performed by (name/date): £ /?*«.„,*.
*
w
Continued from: 3 lit- TV Continued to:
Witnessed by:
Witnessed by:
(signature/date)
t
10
^- ~
25
30
35
- o
Entered by: Wiu-^v- Verified by:
Reviewed by: Validated by:
(initials/date)
(initials/date
-;i'6 -^cl^O IVA.
^U, -
7/5-0 |
'
f>C.3t7
bT)
A &u
0
A«n,
4
»v
C 102
-------
Title/Puruose-
me/rurpose.
Continued from:
~"'"~1'
Performed by (name/date):
Witnessed by:
Continued to: j
?
(signature/date)
)
/
Reviewed by: ft
finitiaJs/date)
Verified by
Va,idated by.
(InHW./*
10
15
torso
30
- 5-
3(
35
35
B C 103
-------
" 3218- 8c
'"" '~MRI Project No.: '-ttoi -«/.*<••• t Performed by (name/date): £ /ef*~~,^ ,,.-»*• .^ 7/d-
Continued from: . Continued to: - Entered by: /,.-/, ,,.n-^ Verified by:
1 Witnessed by: . , • < Reviewed by: NjjU^f Validated by:
Witnessed by:
.... .... ..(signature/date) (initials/date) (initials/date)
I
10
15
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
25
30
I ^Q^.Q(» A/TC. s^)o^, yu: o?-./ ^>t,iS-iS-( + / 5 / «^fr/ «•-/(.- 5
~ 4/0 V
C 104
-------
MR/ Project No.: c
Title/Purpose: fr,47~ '""" Performed "Y (name/date):
Continued from: 97^, r
"•— « ^HlZ V
y^lUU-^ Validated by
/ (signature/date) 0
* *23&, (.<>?„ * Onitia.s/date,
I
15
•/
f
35
•" c -/3 XT --
ctconi) ,,f
5 -f *yff*~, /7s,.,.,.
* 'H'*fJ: ^f,?4 ' ' '^ fS'f»^
f- '< e **T,s-'ts'V •*# ,fft
1 ^
^^^^^c^ ««/*,;•/•
20
<-f?-L-*.>, • « »-^
»». ~^.,., ,«„„, ,,^W
-------
3218- 8
MRI Project No.:
THIe/Purpose:
-* z Performed by (name/date):
Continued from: 71
Witnessed by:
witnessed by:
Continued to: t-:.~/
(signature/date)
Entered by: &„ „.„., /'verified by:
Reviewed by: 7vi£uj_,_Validated by:
~
uj_,_
U~
(initials/date)
(initials/date
J
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ISC/if)'
«>*/ -5
/z
15
25
30
'^ -,'-'-'
•*• 5
"/ 5.
C 106
-------
4601-01-05-02
Quality Control Sample Results
Tenax Only
MRI A\M<«01-01
C 107
-------
BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 CLP Criteria
Datafile : K18Q1
Analysis Date : 11/18/93
Analysis Time : 0751
BFB TUNING 50ng/ul,2615-17-6, 2ul DIR INJ
M/E ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50 15.0 - 40.0% OF MASS 95
75 30.0 - 60.0% OF MASS 95
95 Base Peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
173 Less than 2.0% of mass 174
174 Greater then 50.0% of mass 95
175 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
176 >95.0 but < 101.0% of mass 174
177 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
22.
51.
100.
7.
0.
70.
5.
67.
4.
54
14
00
01
00(
08
45(
80(
29(
0.0)1
7
96
,8)1
8)1
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
6.3)2 PASS
C 108
-------
W
CD
O
63
09
CO
ft
CD
•H
Z
•-5
09 Z
CO **
09
00
S)
CSJ
LD
CV3
H
in
00
•
CO
r-9
in
CO
9
•9
9
PO
9
•9
«
9
•in
H
9
-9
o- i-
03 9
9
X H
Ed
x
9N
\
t
C- 109
-------
BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 CLP Criteria
Datafile : K18Q8
Analysis Date
Analysis Time
11/18/93
1920
BFB TUNING 50ng/ul,2615-17-6, 2ul DIR INJ
M/E
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50 15.0 - 40.0% OF MASS 95
75 30.0 - 60.0% OF MASS 95
95 Base Peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
173 Less than 2.0% of mass 174
174 Greater then 50.0% of mass 95
175 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
176 >95.0 but < 101.0% of mass 174
177 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
21,
50,
100.
6,
0,
68,
5.
65,
4.
00
00
00
63
00(
67
04(
33(
42(
0.0)1
7,
95,
6,
3)1
1)1
8)2
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
C ' 110
-------
o
co
CD
w
CD
V
i-l
Z
co
« K
r —
o —
:> 3
(M
W -
5?
I- N
5-
X 3
O
H
v>
fa
X
in
SC
8
8
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
+J
CD
CD
CD
CD
in
in
U1
CD
in
CO
8
8
8N
X
C 111
-------
INITIAL CALIBRATION CHECK
Result Filename:
Date proccessed:
Time proccessed:
Date analyzed :
Time injected :
ICAL_K18
11/18/93
1439
11/18/93
1009
TAJX
LAB FILE ID: RF20.0=K18Q2 RF50.0=K18Q3
RF999.9=K18Q7
RF250.0=K18Q5 RF500.0=K18Q6
COMPOUND FG RF RF RF RF RF RF
20.0 50.0 250.0 500.0 999.9 MEAN LINEARITY*
^3 Chloromethane
4 Dichlorofluoromethane
^•5 Bromomethane
6 Acetonitrile
7 Acrylonitrile
./ 8 Vinyl Chloride
^ 9 Chloroethane
10 lodomethane
"11 Trichlorofluoromethan
-12 Methylene Chloride
-13 Acetone
-14 Carbon Disulfide
'15 1,1-Dichloroethene
16 1,1-Dichloroethane
'17 1,2-Dichloroethene (t
•18 t-1,2-Dichloroethene
"19 Chloroform
20 1,2-Dichloroethane
~2~2~ 2-Butanone
23 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
24 Carbon Tetrachloride
26 Vinyl Acetate
27 Bromodichloromethane
28 1,2-Dichloropropane
29 cis-1/3-Dichloroprope
30 Trichloroethene
31 2-Chloroethyl vinyl e
32 Dibromochloromethane
33 Dibromomethane
34 Dibroraoethane
•35 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
36 l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
37 Benzene
38 trans-l,3-Dichloropro
_3_9_ Bromoform
43 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
44 2-Hexanone
45 Tetrachloroethene
46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroet
47 Toluene
48 Chlorobenzene
49 Ethylbenzene
50 Styrene
51 m-/p-Xylene
974B0.
836
605 8
474 1
446 3
946 3
827 2
754 2
353 1
385
515
381 1
013 3
197 6
270 2
322 3
456 0
456
978 4
527 4
501 0
412 0
327 0
155 0
526
253 0
480 0
375 0
017 0
354 0
180 0
372 0
310 0
003 0
396
362
C 112
-------
/52 o-Xylene 0.373 0.323 0.392 0.529 0.501 0.424 20.7 %
.53 Hexachloroethane 0.126 0.118 0.126 0.194 0.208 0.154 27.8 %©
54 l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropr 0.020 0.029 0.033 0.061 0.024 0.033 47.7 %(£>
/ 2 l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 3.081 3.029 3.792 4.006 2.635 3.309 17.3 % S
-25 Benzene-d6 S 1.619 1.270 1.515 1.282 1.022 1.342 17.4 % >/
41 4-Bromofluorobenzene S 0.338 0.238 0.291 0.337 0.337 0.308 14.3 % S
•42 Toluene-d8 S 1.477 1.576 1.348 1.508 1.809 1.544 11.0 % «/
% = %Relative Standard Deviation, C_TYPE = 0;
I = Corelation Coefficient, C_TYPE = 1;
* = Mean Square Error, C_TYPE = 2.
- aelJok
<§>
ru^t
©
©
C 113
-------
7.s
i
4
p|ii
nl<\
c2 On&
DO J
d25"D nj;
a-
bD o »^
/DOO K£
A-
52-COO )\X
• .3^00 >4
9 ooo *<£
/^ooo n^
jt-yu.
0
ib /
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K18C4
Sample Description: CHECK STD 2ul INJECTION ON VOST
Date
Time
12/01/93
1539
Analysis Time: 1437
Analysis Date: 11/18/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichl or of luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodoraethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromornethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Bromof orm
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
ra-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
4
4
5
8
9
4
6
7
6
8
8
7
7
9
9
9
11
12
11
12
12
10
14
14
15
14
15
18
14
18
17
22
12
16
21
16
17
17
22
16
19
19
20
19
20
23
27
=s:
.32
.05
.37
.07
.15
.50
.00
.75
.53
.60
.07
.83
.35
.95
.05
.05
.77
.80
.30
.03
.35
.18
.99
.44
.85
.02
.64
.15
.65
.39
.34
.44
.72
.97
.24
.18
.89
.65
.30
.54
.47
.70
.85
.97
.84
.85
.49
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1854283
0
887869
0
168755
0
0
(.115.
n
105>
nno
ng
no
Cl21.272> na
0.
(tt\
0.
422556C159.
0
672128
0
0
1029557
1065782
698791
774094
1647997
1395290
428032
1550763
1238399
0
1510885
955772
1733705
23981
7179
1074224
15229
15407
973291
23566
33261
1420303
821218
2369381
2084937
12197
970178
50317
41239
62460
337238
264140
206787
0
368162
0.
321.
0.
0.
472.
516.
493.
500.
508.
467.
95.
506.
550.
0.
447.
441.
545.
8x
(197
449.
11.
5.
4_4JL.
fll.
3.
586.
422_
064.
(924.
5.
399.
4.
6.
J^>
O35T
43 .
(BO.
0.
859
727
602
£25
04$>
287
035
I£8_
86.8-^
58$>
076
914
740
631
m?
77~1>
737_>
65£>
000
.383^
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng*'
ng
ng
ngf
ng •
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng •
ng
ng»/
ng,/
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
> ng
30 to
o
81 (s\
0
91
0
0 ,
68^
0
93
0
0
91
98
96
88
99
93
9Q&
97
98
0
99
97
99
96
74
98
0
87
66
89®
54
99
97
95(5>
95(p
>«.
96
99
94
89
99(33
90(33
94 f»
98(>>
0
99
'%A -- ^
i
8b"
lit"
u^
m'
llZ"
\JT
in*'
ULl'
(T3$2
110.'
II D"
d^>
I/A*'
IID'
(&£>
Jt>1
too'
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
12.80 65
44976 17.498 ng
40(£>
C 115
-------
Benzene-d6
.4-Bromofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
12.65 84
21.99 95
16.40 98
7196 0.769
63081 33.853
28844 3.089
ng 76
ng 100
ng 78y
1
C 116
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
Raw Filename : K18C7
Sample Description: VOST METHOD BLANK ,
Analysis Time: 1725
Analysis Date: 11/18/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
12/01/93
1539
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
4.10
3.48
5.07
8.52
9.43
4.32
5.67
7.82
6.27
8.38
7
7
7
.62
.88
.42
10.03
9
9
11
12
11
12
12
10
15
14
15
14
15
18
14
18
17
22
12
17
21
16
17
17
22
16
19
19
20
19
20
23
27
.18
.18
.78
.52
.10
.12
.45
.18
.04
.50
.94
.08
.64
.24
.73
.47
.42
.54
.58
.05
.32
.24
.84
.74
.40
.89
.55
.67
.89
.97
.82
.85
.50
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
493652
0
(33.20J;
O7o"oo
Ing
ng
193280 Q7.22JP ng ^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12459
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30890
0
0
0
10692
0
0
7144
0
899
3141
2056
2337
0
1330
~(5TOOO
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
8
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.885
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.575
.000
.000
.000
.798
.000
.000
.823
.000
.518
.546
.416
.115
.000
.042
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
no
iJ
ng
3
no
3
no
3
no
,3
nq
3
nq
j
ng
nq
3
ng
3
no
3
nq
a
nq
3
ng
3
nq
;3
nq
3
nq
j
nq
3
no
3
nq
~
no
y
nq
,3
nq^
3
ng
.7
nq
y
ng
9
nq*''
3
nq
3
nq
y
nq
;3
nq
3
nq
7
no
3
nq s
.3
nq •
3
nq
j
ngi/
22
0
53
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
0
66
0
0
0
85
0
o
52
o
65
67
84
80
0
62
/2-Dichloroethane-d4
12.48 65
483977 265.468 ng 74
C 117
-------
Benzene-d6 12.50 84 1322398 211.895 ng 100^
-4-Broraofluorobenzene 21.99 95 557877 366.133 ng lOO*'
Toluene-d8 16.32 98 1503846 196.962 ng 92*/
c us
-------
Datafile : K19Q1
BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 CLP Criteria
Analysis Date
Analysis Time
11/19/93
0759
BFB TUNING 50ng/ul,2615-17-6, 2ul DIR INJ
M/E
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50 15.0 - 40.0% OF MASS 95
75 30.0 - 60.0% OF MASS 95
95 Base Peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
173 Less than 2.0% of mass 174
174 Greater then 50.0% of mass 95
175 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
176 >95.0 but < 101.0% of mass 174
177 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
22,
51.
100.
6,
0.
61.
4.
59.
82
68
00
75
16(
07
70<
73(
0.3)1
7.
97,
7)1
8)1
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
4.15( 7.0)2 PASS
C 119
-------
en
UJ
r-
CD
CD
CD
CO
Q
M
C
vD
CD
CD Z
CO
« K
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
12/01/93
1543
Raw Filename : K19C5
Sample Description: VOST METHOD BLANK
Analysis Time: 1437
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
I. S. 2615-18-4, TA;/
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
Compound
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
5
4
6
10
10
6
7
8
7
9
8
8
7
10
10
10
12
13
12
13
13
11
15
15
16
14
15
19
15
19
18
23
14
17
22
1 **
18
18
23
17
20
20
21
20
21
24
28
.13
.53
.32
.98
.13
.82
.22
.62
.10
.48
.48
.63
.00
.92
.02
.02
.72
.67
.23
.02
.33
.08
.94
.40
.80
.97
.35
.12
.64
.35
.29
.37
.00
.90
.20
1 •=•
.84
.62
.24
.79
.42
.69
.82
.92
.82
.72
.74
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
AT
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1470197
0
552261
0
10381
0
0
248562
0
31277
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20205
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I CO AC
32783
0
0
0
0
3200
5755
7196
4095
0
2612
(§1
^
167
0
4
0
0
cs
^u
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•>
11
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
9
.44^)
-HDD
_^2&
.000
.500
.000
.000
793£>
70~00
.353
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.022
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
6O T
.093
.000
.000
.000
.000
.151
.768
.909
.219
.000
.855
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
19
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
28
0
69s
0
80
0
0
46V(0
0
85^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80V
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n i L>^il 1
— y*
-------
Benzene-d6
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
13.67 84 2380656 226.493 ng
22.95 95 864531 354.016 ng
17.37 98 2322695 189.807 ng
100^
100^
93 ,/
\u« (jj
C 122
-------
DAILY CALIBRATION CHECK
Date proccessed: 11/19/93
Time proccessed: 1323
CCAL Filename :
K19Q3
ICAL Filename : ICAL_K18
COMPOUND
3 Chloromethane
4 Dichlorof luoromethane
5 Bromomethane
6 Acetonitrile
7 Acrylonitrile
8 Vinyl Chloride
9 Chloroethane
10 lodomethane
11 Trichlorof luoromethane
12 Methylene Chloride
13 Acetone
14 Carbon Disulfide
15 1, 1-Dichloroethene
16 1, 1-Dichloroethane
17 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
18 t-l,2-Dichloroethene
19 Chloroform
20 1,2-Dichloroethane
22 2-Butanone
23 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
24 Carbon Tetrachloride
26 Vinyl Acetate
27 Bromodichloromethane
28 1,2-Dichloropropane
29 cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
30 Trichloroethene
31 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
32 Dibromochloromethane
33 Dibromomethane
34 Dibromoethane
35 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
36 l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
37 Benzene
38 trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
39 Bromoform
43 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
44 2-Hexanone
45 Tetrachloroethene
46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
47 Toluene
48 Chlorobenzene
49 Ethylbenzene
Date analyzed
Time injected
Date analyzed
Time injected
FLAG RF RF
SPC
C
»
C
SPC
C
C
SPC
SPC
C
SPC
C
MEAN 250
20.736 f!3. 823V (
1.281 0. 92T
9.424 5.319 (
2.705 3.912 £
2.650 2.935
3.308 2.509
1.869 1.979
3.402 3.505
1.778 2.125
2.691 1.897
4.302 3.151
6.893 4.933
2.803 2.598
2.655 |2.893K
1.821 \.679
1.992 1.743
4.170 4.468
3.842 4.191
0.641 0.771
0.439 0.432
0.322 0.277
0.164 0.169
0.484 0.464
0.311 0.295
0.456 0.400
0.407 0.384
0.026 0.021
0.343 0.363
0.186 0.180
0.394 0.379
0.317 0.320
0.005 0.010 c-l
1.451 1.222
0.348 0.314
0.276 J0.284J"-
0.512 0.546
0.373 0.404
0.397 0.337
0.401 QCEEK -
1.755 1.360
1.028 V0.941(v
0.351 0.3fl2
: 11/19/93
: 1231
: 11/18/93
: 1009
%D
;33.3j^
28^0
5f7(b<>-
jU_J>_^uJ
10.7
24. 2^
-5.9
-3.0
19.6
29.5-
26.7-
28.4-
7.3*''
-8.9-
7.8
12.5
-7.1^
-9.1
20.2
1.5
14.0
-3.1
4.1
5.1 v*
12.3
5.5
20.1
-6.0
3.6
3.9
-1_._0 ^ r^
15.8
9.7
-3.1
-6.6
-8.3
15.2
23.0
22.5""
8.5 ,
-9.0"
C 123
-------
50 Styrene 0.411 0.515 -25.4^
51 m-/p-Xylene 0.998 1.023 -2.5
52 o-Xylene 0.424 0.476 -12.4
53 Hexachloroethane 0.154 0.150 3.0
54 l,2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane 0.033 0.050
2 l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 3.309 3.751 -13.4
25 Benzene-de S 1.342 1.527 -13.9
41 4-Broraofluorobenzene S 0.308 0.340 -10.2
42 Toluene-d8 S 1.543 1.169 24.3
(_- =
u
"
f
C 124
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
12/01/93
1543
Raw Filename : K19C9
Sample Description: VOST METHOD BLANK.T^
Analysis Time: 1721
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
Compound
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlor of luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene '
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
1 , 2-Dichloroethane-d4
H
4.83 50
4.53 85
6.10 94
10.60 41
10.18 53
5.37 62
6.97 64
8.62 142
7.10 101
9.47 84
8.32 43
10.30 76
6.87 96
10.92 63
10.02 96
10.02 96
12.72 83
13.67 62
12.22 43
13.02 97
13.33 117
12.22 43
15.94 83
15.40 63
16.80 75
14.97 130
15.57 63
19.12 129
15.64 93
19.35 107
18.29 97
23.37 124
13.73 78
17.90 75
22.20 173
17.75 43
18.84 43
18.62 164
23.24 83
17.52 91
20.45 112
20.67 106
21.84 104
20.94 106
21.80 106
24.72 117
28.74 157
13.62 65
1C " 1 25
(j JL A* «J
1673052
0
463446
0
0
0
0
134819
0
17439
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29460
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
373633
0
0
0
23295
0
0
20869
75569
4955
12984
11758
3892
0
5139
749266
<£CK_29J-
0_.J)00
<£5^03^
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
<<4~473~5~r;
~o.oo5"
7.254
o.ooo-
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.388
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
<35.789>
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.786
0.000
0.000
1.482
9.159
1.761
3.940
1.467
1.144
0.000
19.151
253.451
•> ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
> ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
27
0
89^
0
0
0
0
60/
0
83
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
89^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95^
0
0
0
84"'
0
0
82>/
93'
89"
73^
86'
83^
0
66*^
88V
-------
Benzene-d6
-4-Bromof luorobenzene
Toluene-d8
13.67 84
22.97 95
17.37 98
2214826 229.508
1045472 422.872
2230384 180.034
ng 100"'
ng 100'
ng 95 "^
-C
126
-------
4601-01-05-02
Quality Control Sample Results
Tenax/Charcoal
UFU-AVM4S01-01
C 127
-------
Datafile : K22Q2
BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 CLP Criteria
Analysis Date
Analysis Time
11/22/93
0830
BFB TUNING 50ng/ul,2615-17-6, 2ul DIR INJ
M/E
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50 15.0 - 40.0% OF MASS 95
75 30.0 - 60.0% OF MASS 95
95 Base Peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
173 Less than 2.0% of mass 174
174 Greater then 50.0% of mass 95
175 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
176 >95.0 but < 101.0% of mass 174
177 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
21.
50.
100.
6,
0,
62,
4.
59.
53
50
00
25
00(
38
67(
90(
0.0)1
3.96(
7,
96,
6,
5)1
0)1
6)2
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
C 128
-------
CD
m
CO
CD
O
CD
CD
CO
O
r
sO
CD
Z
CO
CD Z
CD HH
CO
O K
Q
O ~
=> 3
fsj
W •>
frn i^Q
=3 I
f-i
Z1
O -
-------
BFB TUNE CHECK REPORT
1986 CLP Criteria
Datafile : K23Q1
Analysis Date : 11/23/93
Analysis Time : 0907
BFB TUNING 50ng/ul,2615-17-6, 2ul DIR INJ
M/E ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
ABUNDANCE
TUNE
50 15.0-40.0% OF MASS 95
75 30.0 - 60.0% OF MASS 95
95 Base Peak, 100% relative abundance
96 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
173 Less than 2.0% of mass 174
174 'Greater then 50.0% of mass 95
175 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
176 >95.0 but < 101.0% of mass 174
177 5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
22
53,
100,
7,
0,
63,
5,
61,
75
37
00
51
00(
48
06(
24(
0.0)1
4.32(
8
96
7
,0)1
.5)1
,1)2
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
130
-------
r-
cs
en
s
03
CO
CO
Q
H
vfl
^
CD
r
CO
"3
CD Z
53 M
00
§•3
CM
W -
Sf
I
I/)
N
I *
o ^
K 3
-------
INITIAL CALIBRATION CHECK
Result Filename:
Date proccessed:
Time proccessed:
Date analyzed
Time injected :
ICAL_K22
11/23/93
1339
11/23/93
1056
-r/a,
LAB FILE ID: RF20.0=K23Q2
RF999.9=K22Q7
RF50.0=K23Q3 RF240.0=K22Q5 RF500.0=K22Q6
COMPOUND
FG RF RF RF RF RF RF
20.0 50.0 240.0 500.0 999.9 MEAN LINEARITY*
S3 Chloromethane
4 Dichlorofluoromethane
^37 Benzene
•38 trans-1,3-Dichloropro
•39 Bromoform
/43 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
^44 2-Hexanone
•45 Tetrachloroethene
•46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroet
x47 Toluene
•48 Chlorobenzene
/49 Ethylbenzene
/50 Styrene
y51 m-/p-Xylene
52.4~~T6-
114.7
42.9
38.
57.2
808
6.091 3
2.286 2
,603
2.517
2.535
4.217 3
4.538 3
0.851 0
0.425 0
0.247
0.122
0.497 0
0.280 0
0.473 0
0.432 0
0.017 0
0.331 0
0.177 0
0.389 0
0.317 0
.0.011 0
,749 1
0.333 0
0.207 0
0.870 0
0.554 0
0.582 0
0.479 0
2.131 1
1.012 0
0.443 0
0.497 0
1.170 1
682
421 3
074 1
364 2
540
540
141
698
495 0
363 0
250 0
169 0
417
273
387 0
361 0
010 0
307 0
158 0
362 0
282 0
012 0
216 1
300 0
234 0
487 0
341 0
359 0
412 0
417 1
916 0
375 0
418 0
Oil 1
,082
,364 0
,383 0
.242 0
,052 0
,339 0.
,241 0
,342 0
,374 0
,016 0
,234 0
,117 0
,298 0
,214 0
,011 0
,244 1.
,249 0
,196 0.
,534 0.
.395 0
,428 0
,420 0
,632 1
.924 0
,408 0
,445 0
.071 1
705
705
782 3.
472 3,
324
379
226 0,
021 0,
231
217 0.
279 0.
409 0.
046 0.
140 0.
116 0.
196 0.
140 0,
Oil 0.
452
183 0,
143 (if
510
403 0,
495 0,
419 {IT
959 1
941 nr
440 0,
481 0,
102 1,
C 132
-------
•52 o-Xylene 0.482 0.519 0.443 0.469 0.504 0.483 6.1 %
53 Hexachloroethane 0.119 0.145 0.154 0.160 0.168 0.149 12.5 %
54 l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropr 0.066 0.084 0.071 0.078 0.090 0.078 12.5 %
=======;
v 2 l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 3.459 4.117 3.150 2.598 2.102 3.085 25.2 %
/25 Benzene-d6 S 1.576 1.071 1.218 1.125 1.720 1.342 21.5 %
/41 4-Bromofluorobenzene S 0.403 0.335 0.296 0.285 0.294 0.323 15.2 %
*M2 Toluene-d8 S 1.530 1.705 1.293 1.508 1.814 1.570 12.7 %
% * %Relative Standard Deviation, C_TYPE = 0;
# = Corelation Coefficient, CJTYPE = 1;
* = Mean Square Error, C_TYPE = 2.
0
\0 "-
-
C 133
-------
DAILY CALIBRATION CHECK
Date proccessed: 11/23/93
Time proccessed: 1450
CCAL Filename : K23Q4
ICAL Filename : ICAL_K22
COMPOUND
FLAG
Date analyzed :
Time injected :
Date analyzed :
Time injected :
RF
MEAN
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromoraethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Broraodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 / 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibroraoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Broraoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
SPC 31
1
8
2
2
C 2
2
2
1
1
2
4
C 1
SPC 2
1
1
C 3
3
0
0
0
0
0
C 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
SPC 0
0
0
0
SPC 0
C 1
SPC 0
C 0
.775
.358
.901
.325
.446
.757
.166
.974
.223
.995
.778
.916
.970
.448
.870
.873
.502
.479
.553
.382
.236
.091
.396
.253
.378
.402
.024
.265
.154
.322
.257
.012
.622
.267
.193
.598
.422
.446
.437
.789
.944
.416
RF
11/23/93
1341
11/23/93
1056
\\-*V
T^U »f>s * *
240 JeA0^ U^"^
[9,
0.
2.
4.
2.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
2.
5.
1.
j~2T
1.
1.
3.
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
\ o .
0.
0.
0.
for
1.
^J. •
(0.
845V
728
987
325
305
802
803
965
678
623
799
192
945
•any
781
946
991
256
877
404
271
075
491
322
406
415
030
380
186
417
341
Oil
381
282
T78}/
674
441
397
454V
543
"DT4T'X
395 \'
69
46
66
-86
5
-1
16
67
-37
18
-0
-5
1
-18
4
-3
-14
-22
-58
-5
-14
17
-24
£r77
-7
-3
-24
-43
-21
-29
-32
3
14
-5
-43
-12
-4
11
-3
13
-7
5
.0 ^
.4
.4
.0
.8
.6"-
.8
.6-
.3-
.6
.7
.6
.3*"
.1
.7
.9
.0 ^
.3
. 6 —
.8
.9
.7
.1
75~>— &M/C
. 5
.3
.9
.1 -
.3
.7
.9-
.0
.8
.5
.8-
.8
.5
.1
.9
. 8*s
.5
. \\S
C 134
-------
50 Styrene 0.462 0.449 2.8
51 ra-/p-Xylene . 1.092 1.066 2.4
52 o-Xylene 0.483 0.484 -0.1
53 Hexachloroethane 0.149 0.157 -5.2
54 1,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane 0.078 0.075 2.9
2 l/2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 3.085 3.764 -22.0
25 Benzene-d6 S 1.342 1.588 -18.3
41 4-Bromofluorobenzene S 0.323 0.337 -4.5
42 Toluene-d8 S 1.570 1.354 13.7
C- 135
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K23C5
Sample Description: VOST BLANK IS SUR MIX lul 2615-28-4,T/
Date
Time
12/01/9
1552
Analysis Time: 1515
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Broraodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromoraethane
Dibromoe thane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoforra
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
1 , 2-Dichloroethane-d4
b.
5.
7.
10.
11.
6.
7.
9.
8.
10.
10.
9.
8.
12.
11.
11.
13.
14.
13.
14.
14.
12.
17.
16.
17.
16.
17.
20.
16.
20.
18.
24.
14.
19.
23.
18.
19.
19.
24.
18.
21.
21.
22.
22.
22.
25.
30.
14.
73
40
13
98
15
25
88
73
30
55
47
77
57
02
12
12
93
87
22
14
47
13
05
50
93
10
45
27
77
54
97
50
83
00
35
18
89
74
37
82
59
77
94
02
90
90
34
70
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
65
2269221
0
782628
0
37497
0
0
145202
0
55159
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
198065
0
6519
74330
140233
0
35948
0
0
2371
26077
11589
7786
0
12226
1061080
65.
0.
80.
0.
14.
0.
0.
44.
0.
25.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
12.
0.
3.
11.
C30.
0.
7.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
1.
0.
14.
— 55 = SS
315,.
502
000
640
000
058
000
000
776
000
365
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
514
000
461
436
5_2JD
000
561
000
000
524
185
976
481
000
460
451
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
1 ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
22 (,n
0
64 (,^>
o
86 10
0
0 .
30 (»}
0
73
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85 v^
0
74
93^
94^
0
96V
0
0
79'
90'
89^
84"'
0
ee^
85 •*
C 136
-------
Benzene-d6 14.75 84 3382591 258.254 ng 100
4-Broraofluorobenzene 24.09 95 1122291319.788 no 100
Toluene-d8 18.47 98 3163660 185.249 ng 93
/Q
C 137
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
Raw Filename : K23C4
Sample Description: PREFORMANCE ADUIT SAMPLE 2ul + lulls,T/C
Analysis Time: 1421
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
Compound
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
**f\*
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodoraethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1, 1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibroraoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
5
5
7
10
11
6
7
9
8
10
9
9
8
12
11
11
13
14
13
14
14
12
17
16
17
16
17
20
16
20
19
24
14
19
23
18
19
19
24
18
21
21
22
22
22
25
30
.73
.40
.15
.62
.15
.25
.80
.72
.13
.62
.40
.77
.75
.05
.13
.15
.84
.90
.29
.15
.49
.13
.07
.54
.95
.12
.72
.29
.77
.54
.43
.54
.85
.04
.39
.24
.92
.79
.39
.84
.59
.82
.97
.07
.95
.90
.37
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
2751051
0
968512
89824
72771
0
0
248315
0
1305476
0
0
20144
2026479
1363192
1474374
2400061
2290804
31180
2044185
1464108
0
2104587
1531215
2354791
30929
12871
1589541
0
0
1500296
615
225361
1853117
1112792
580540
588842
8510
1587775
37249
0
12603
83054
46017
34132
14799
30777
62
0
78
27
21
0
0
60
0
471
0
0
7
596
524
566
493
474
4
466
540
0
463
527
543
6
47
522
0
0
509
4
12
604
502
/no
<4T58
2
413
2
0
3
20
4
8
11
45
.339
.000
.341
.813
.418
.000
.000
.111
.000
.280
.000
.000
.361
.023
.965
.658
.485
.147
..918
.526
.381
.000
.798
.680
.156
.704
.407
.416
.000
.000
.303
.681
.112
.105
.511
.710
. 90JD
.174
.984
.373
.000
.450
.471
.802
.048
.311
.121
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng\/
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng"
ng •
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
29
0
61
15
79
0
0
78
0
97
0
0
0
98 (
96
92 C
99
95
71
98
98
0
99
97
99
96
74
98
0
0
65
68
48
99
97
95
96
94
99
69
0
96
94
91
91
46
92
Jd-b
un
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
14.74 65
1193574 278.559 ng 75
C 138
-------
Benzene-d6 14.80 84 3999376 259.741 ng 100
4-Bromofluorobenzene 24.12 95 749763 264.825 nq 100 •
Toluene-d8 18.52 98 3310867240.318 ng 94,
C 139
-------
DAILY CALIBRATION CHECK
Date proccessed: 11/24/93
Time proccessed: 0819
CCAL Filename :
ICAL Filename : ICJ
COMPOUND
3 Chloromethane
4 Dichlorofluoromethane
5 Broraproethane
6 Acetonitrile
7 Acrylonitrile
8 Vinyl Chloride
9 Chloroethane
10 lodoraethane
11 Trichlorof luororaethane
12 Methylene Chloride
13 Acetone
14 Carbon Disulfide
15 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
16 1, 1-Dichloroethane
17 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
18 t-1, 2-Dichloroethene
19 Chloroform
20 1 , 2 -Dichloroethane
22 2-Butanone
23 1, 1,1-Trichloroethane
24 Carbon Tetrachloride
26 Vinyl Acetate
27 Bromodichloromethane
28 1,2 -Dichloropropane
29 cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
30 Trichloroethene
31 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
32 Dibromochloromethane
33 Dibromome thane
34 Dibromoethane
35 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
36 l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
37 Benzene
38 trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
39 Bromoform
43 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
44 2-Hexanone
45 Tetrachloroethene
46 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
47 Toluene
48 Chlorobenzene
49 Ethylbenzene
K23Q5
\L_K22
FL
SPC
C
C
SPC
C
C
SPC
SPC
C
SPC
C
Date analyzed : 11/23/93
Time injected : 1341
Date analyzed : 11/23/93
Time injected : 1056
AG RF RF %D £*/ £ d^ *k-~k*-
MEAN 240 "0+*~A Tj
P*> v*U/A^
31.775 J11.37£J^ 64.2 ii/*>// -18.9
1.870 1.775 5.1
1.873 1.939 -3.5
3.502 4.052 -15.7V
3.479 4.106 -18.0
0.553 0.687 -24.3
0.382 0.378 1.0
0.236 0.257 -8.6
0.091 0.199 -117.7
0.396 0.457 -15.6
0.253 0.290 -14.5""
0.378 0.399 -5.5
0.402 0.418 -4.1
0.024 0.029 -21.0
0.265 0.356 -34.3
0.154 0.233 -51.7
0.322 0.386 -19.9
0.257 0.324 -26.3
0.012 0.015 -33.7
1.622 1.351 16.7
0.267 0.305 -13.9
0.193 ) 0.29 If -50.8
0.598 0.578 3.2
0.422 0.406 3.7
0.446 0.381 14.6
0.437 fo.538f -23.0
1.789 ^.479 17. 3u-
0.944 U7042> -10.4
0.416 0.406 2.6v
C 140
-------
50 Styrene 0.462 0.538 -16.4
51 ra-/p-Xylene 1.092 1.141 -4.4
52 o-Xylene 0.483 0.526 -8.8
53 Hexachloroethane 0.149 0.174 -17.0
54 l,2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane 0.078 0.096 -23.9
2 l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 S 3.085 3.532 -14.5
25 Benzene-d6 S 1.342 1.657 -23.5
41 4-Bromofluorobenzene S 0.323 0.368 -14.1
42 Toluene-d8 S 1.570 1.363 13.2
C 141
-------
4601-01-05-02
Sample Results
MRI-AVM4601-01 @|l P 142
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
Raw Filename : K19C7
Sample Description: TR BL TNX 1077
Analysis Time: 1550
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
Compound
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodoraethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
ra-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
5,
4,
6,
10,
10,
6,
7.
8.
7.
9.
8.
8.
7.
10.
10.
10.
12.
13.
12.
13.
13.
12.
15.
15.
16.
14.
16.
19.
15.
19.
18.
23.
13.
17.
22.
17.
18.
18.
23.
17.
20.
20.
21.
20.
21.
24.
28.
.22
.53
.32
.97
,18
,87
,40
,67
,10
50
52
63
02
92
02
02
72
72
27
02
33
27
94
40
80
97
54
12
64
35
29
37
78
90
20
17
87
62
24
57
42
70
87
97
84
72
80
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1674631
0
584532
0
14059
0
0
180363
0
42240
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29149
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
106433
0
0
11323
25130
0
0
0
0
2708
5142
7131
3132
0
0
93,
0.
72,
0.
6.
0.
.940
.000
.150
.000
,171
,000
0.000
61.
,673
0.000
18.261
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
0.
0.
2.
8.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
565
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
976
000
000
670
141
000
000
000
000
933
512
863
892
000
000
nq
3
ng
3
na
3
nq
3;
nq
3
nq
3
nq
3
nq
3
nq
3
ng
nq
3
nq
j
nq
*3
nq
*y
nq
* j
nq
*3
nq
u\4
nq
j
nq
*3
nq
*3
nq
j
nq
3
nq
"y
nq
J
nq
3
na
3
na
3
na
3
na
3
nq
3
nq
3
ng
J
nq
3
nq
3
na
3
nq
3
na
3
nq
^9
nq
iy
nq
j
nq
^
ng
ng
3
nq
3
nq
3
nq
3
ng
31
0
81
0
85
0
0
43
0
91
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
84
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
82
0
0
94
92
0
0
0
0
84
77,
84
85
0
0
S
V*-*-
/
s
s
•s
*>•
s
s
/
•
•
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
13.67 65
820109 288.328
ng
76
C 143
-------
Benzene-d6
4-Broraofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
13.70 84 2517194229.655 ng 100 /
23.00 95 827928 324.600 ng 100 ^
17.40 98 2424762 189.716 ng 94*'
C 144
-------
Quantitation Results
====================
Date
Time
Raw Filename : K23C9
Sample Description: SAMPLE TR B T/C 1078 IS& SURROGATE 26
Analysis Time: 1914
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MR I
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
12/01/93
1552
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Broraomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodoraethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Uo4-u*>i -,~— fu i „ — ; j —
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1, 2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoforra
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
= 35 = 32:= 3S = =::BS53S35=;sss:s; = = = =i = S = = :B::
5.
5.
6.
10.
11.
6.
7.
9.
8.
i n
9.
9.
8.
11.
11.
11.
1 -\
14.
13.
14.
14.
11.
17.
16.
17.
16.
17.
20.
16.
20.
19.
24.
14.
19.
23.
18.
19.
19.
24.
18.
21.
22.
22.
22.
22.
25.
30.
bb
40
97
52
15
78
38
62
00
jlfl
70
77
63
47
12
02
O A
79
15
14
47
35
05
52
93
10
64
27
77
54
42
50
79
04
37
80
85
79
39
59
59
00
92
00
89
90
37
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
r\A
43
76
96
63
96
96
n~\
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
4008813
0
861536
0
0
0
0
143886
0
1 0"T"
0
0
0
0
0
0
*•* »"\ rt
0
37264
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2178751
0
0
0
0
0
0
65677
0
20072
10647
26653
4037
0
0
===========
76.
0.
58.
0.
0.
0.
0.
29.
0.
q
-^ •
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
115.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
0.
3.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
= = = =
037
000
332
000
000
000
000
156
000
8"* A.
£<
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
821
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
970
000
000
000
000
000
000
036
000
988
905
019
691
000
000
= = = =
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
n9
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
=======
43
0
90«/
0
0
0
0
67 •
o.
-,1 h \-rtj
w^s**
0
0
0
0
0
0
,- , 1 -,N U4
0
89
-------
Benzene-d6 14.72 84 3265062 210.006 ng 100
4-Broraofluorobenzene 24.07 95 1505852 386.058 ng 100
Toluene-d8 18.43 98 3606374 189.999 ng 93
At
C 146
-------
Quantisation Results
Date
Time
Raw Filename : K19C6
Sample Description: FD B TNX 1075
Analysis Time: 1514
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
12/01/93
1544
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichlororaethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibroraochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromof orm
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
5
4
6
11
10
6
7
8
7
9
8
8
6
10
10
10
12
13
12
13
13
12
15
15
16
14
16
19
15
19
18
23
13
17
22
17
18
18
23
17
20
20
21
20
21
24
28
.22
.53
.28
.04
.14
.82
.57
.67
.10
.48
.43
.63
.75
.92
.02
.02
.72
.70
.25
.02
.33
.25
.94
.40
.80
.97
.54
.12
.64
.35
.29
.37
.77
.90
.20
.15
.87
.62
.24
.84
.42
.70
.85
.94
.82
.72
.74
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1433300
0
529854
0
14610
0
0
196403
0
37353
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7122
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12354
27167
0
0
0
0
0
7419
10120
0
0
0
78
0
63
0
6
0
0
65
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
8
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
.509
.000
.862
.000
.262
.000
.000
.576
.000
.768
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.353
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.908
.785
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.178
.222
.000
.000
.000
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
3
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
j
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
33
0
74^
0
81 VV-MJ
0
0
43^
0
89^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
84V
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94»/
92 •
0
0
0
0
0
77 •
88 '
0
0
0
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
13.65 65
821898 282.154 ng 85
C 147
-------
Benzene-de . 13.69 84 2492031 226.269 ng 100
4-Broraofluorobenzene 22.99' 95 889258 348.016 ng 100
Toluene-d8 17.40 98 2427152 189.560 ng 94
C 148
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K23C10
Sample Description: SAMPLE FD B T/C 1076 IS & SURROGATE 2
Date : 12/01/9:
Time : 1553
Analysis Time:- 1951
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Mfithvlcnj" rhloridc
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochlororaethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1, 2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
c-
5
7
11
11
6
7
9
8
10
9
9
8
12
11
11
1 ">
14
1 1
14
14
12
17
16
17
16
17
20
16
20
19
24
14
19
23
18
19
19
24
18
21
22
*, A*
22
22
25
30
8"1
.40
.08
.43
.33
.25
.60
58
.57
\ 3
.62
.77
.62
.02
.12
.12
7 A
.72
1 1
* *• *•
.14
.47
.13
.05
.52
.93
.10
.75
.27
.77
.54
.42
.50
.79
.04
.37
.22
.92
.79
.39
.59
.59
.00
.00
.92
.90
.37
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
112
101
g/t
43
76
96
63
96
96
fll
62
A 1
*4 J
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112 .
106
106
106
117
157
"**» -%fT A f) -»
0
612537
0
0
0
0
72337
0
36578
0
0
0
0
0
0
9f
0
"1 ^ O •• t rt
J D v / J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
425173
0
0
0
0
0
0
43654
0
12380
16735
2440
0
0
en
0
49
0
0
0
0
17
0
1 *5
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.
0
c
~J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
f XI
.000
.642
.000
.000
.000
.000
545
.000
266
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
1 n 1
.000
flfi
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.377
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.145
.000
.614
.347
.444
.000
.000
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
0
50 •/
0
0
0
0
0 U"")
/ ^
70 (»'
0
0
0
0
0
0
in(j~>
o
F 1 rf 1)
01 '\J '
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
92^
0
0
0
0
0
0
86^
0
92^
i O
91^
69 •
0
0
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
14.65 65
1172904 274.260 ng 89 ••/
C 149
-------
Ben2ene-d6 14.72 84 3422922 217.684 ng 100
4-Bromofluorobenzene 24.05 95 1166369 317.819 ng 100
Toluene-d8 18.43 98 3479814 194.854 ng 94
C 150
-------
Quantitation Results
Date
Time
12/01/93
1539
Raw Filename : K18C8
Sample Description: SAMPLE PR 2 TNX 4601-01
** '04,
Analysis Time: 1822
Analysis Date: 11/18/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
T..J J_l__
loaoractnunc
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1, 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
.4
3
5
8
9
3
4
6
8
7
7
7
10
9
9
11
12
11
12
12
10
15
14
15
14
15
18
14
18
17
22
12
17
21
15
17
17
22
16
19
19
20
19
20
23
27
3=;
.48
.47
.45
.25
.95
.23
fifl
.27
.62
.87
.88
.40
.03
.18
.18
.78
.75
.32
.12
.45
.18
.04
.50
.94
.08
.•65
.24
.73
.47
.42
.54
.75
.05
.32
.90
.87
.64
.40
.50
.55
.67
.84
.94
.80
.85
.47
85
94
41
53
62
64
1 A**
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
0
2521017
140422
0
0
0
jl o 1 41O
0
0
2941974
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
342674
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20164531
0
0
0
0
0
0
1147236
0
60693
30893
297208
107623
0
0
1 =;n=;
0.
388.
75.
0.
0.
0.
^ni
0.
0.
993.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
92.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2394
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
102.
0.
27.
11.
46.
39.
0.
0.
= S = = 3=
000
741
424
000
000
000
f\f A
000
000
771
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
093
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
.070
000
000
000
000
000
000
810
000
219
832
817
935
000
000
s=ss = =
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
======
JU ^\ i
0
95^
56(^
0
0
0
C.f 1 --)
b->O;
0
0
10(^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98^"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99 S
0
0
0
0
0
0
98 ^
0
98-^
76^
95^
98>/
0
0
S = = 3S3SS=±3=
,2-Dichloroethane-d4
12.65 65
598187 262.729 ng 66
C 151
-------
Benzene-d6
4-Broraofluorobenzene
ToLuene-d8
12.67 84
21.97 95
16.37 98
1844778 236.941
687668 351.079
1881057 191.649
no 92 /
ng 100 V
ng 94-'
'
.-
i ^.t-
j
*^t-
-lu
jua A
W/ifri
^
C 1S2
-------
Quantisation Results
Raw Filename : K23C11
Sample Description: SAMPLE PR2 T/C 1070 IS & SURROGATE 26
Date
Time
12/01/9
1553
Analysis Time: 2027
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
ehluiumeLhaae
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
V^ il X U ^
-------
Benzene-dS
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
14.69 84
24.04 95
18.42 98
4744476 208.500
1873716 372.769
5232962 213.941
ng 100
ng 100
ng 92
C 154
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K19C8
Sample Description: SAMPLE 1073 RUN1 PAR4 TNX 612 + lul I
Date
Time
Analysis Time: 1637
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
12/01/9:
1544
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene" (total)
t-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-l , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibroraomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbromo-3-chloropropane
sss:=sss2sssss = = :5=s3:25:s = 8ss = sssss
4.93
4.53
6.10
10.05
10.07
5.37
6.52
8.53
7.10
10.98
ft 7(1
8.63
8.25
10.92
10.02
10.02
12.72
13.77
12.12
13.02
13.33
12.12
15.94
13.77
16.80
14.97
17.09
19.12
15.64
19.35
18.29
23.37
13.84
17.90
22.20
17.09
18.80
18.64
23.24
17.49
20.42
20.67
21.82
20.92
21.79
24.72
28.72
ES3S3SS3SSA
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
i i
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1584177
0
313663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-i-i c f t an
1 t O O ^ O *J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2088265
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
96912008
0
0
267261
816802
20557
0
3914193
458138
204192
270184
891734
344497
0
55227
= 3E=S3T=Sa = S3S3S
53.379
0.000
23.256
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
i^ f 1 .* t -^
Jol . 417
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
207.277
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
4249.583
0.000
0.000
36.812
154.551
3.650
0.000
157.326
31.433
41.073
46.412
63.002
57.334
0.000
116.513
na
44y
na
y
na
y
na
y
na
y
na
44 y
na
44 y
na
**y
na
y
na
3
ng
no
uy
no
44 y
na
uy
no
uy
na
uy
na
44y
na
44 y
na
44y
na
44y
na
44 y
no
uy
no
uy
na
"y
ng
no
44y
no
u y
na
14y
no
uy
na
44y
na
uy
na
4iy
na
44 y
na
44 y
na
44 y
na
**y
na
uy
na
44 y
na
uy
na
44 y
na
4 y
na
4*y
na
44 y
na
44 y
na
44y
na
44y
ng
43
T J
o
86 •
V W
o
o
o
o
o
o
V
o
rtrt ll^v
93 v >
Q
\J
o
\J
o
\J
o
\J
97 *S
3 I
n
V
n
V
n
\j
n
V
0
n
\i
n
\j
n
\j
o
79(^
' •* Vr
0 .
v •
n
W
93 •
* «J
qfi1''
7 v
92"'
•* fc
98
-------
Benzene-d6
4-Bromofluorobenzene
Toluene-d8
/ft fuJLu pe-iJ^"'-
13.68 84 4227901 200.558 ng
22.95 95 1688253 386.581 ng
17.35 98 4192940 191.602 ng
40
100
93
tU&^x,
C 156
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K23C12
Sample Description: PR4 T/C 1074 IS & SURROGATE 2815-18-4
Date
Time
12/01/9;
1554
Analysis Time: 2101
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichlorome thane
1 , 2 -Dichloropropane
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromoraethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromoforra
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
ra-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
5
5
7
11
11
6
7
9
8
10
9
9
9
12
11
11
13
14
13
14
14
11
17
16
17
16
17
20
16
20
19
24
14
19
23
17
i n
19
24
18
21
21
22
22
22
25
30
= = = ==25
.77
.40
.15
.10
.07
.60
.58
.73
.60
.48
.65
.82
.32
.37
.12
.33
.72
.79
.10
.09
.47
.65
.05
.52
.93
.10
.60
.27
.77
.54
.67
.50
.80
.04
.37
.50
8-T
.79
.39
.59
.59
.79
.92
.02
.90
.90
.37
S35 = 3
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
A 0
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
= = = = = =
13491634
0
0
0
0
0
0
285277
0
136897
0
765476
0
0
0
0
0
0
169501
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3338979
0
0
0
i i n i c
0
0
129877
0
8997
23648
75014
9659
0
0
B=± = = = = 3==3SaS==S3
139
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
22
0
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
110
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
3
4
1
0
0
BS3KSS
.097
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.420
.000
.485
.000
.006
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.454
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.449
.000
.000
.000
-T« 1
.000
.000
.377
.000
.303
.084
.141
.205
.000
.000
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
71^
0
47
0
93 S
0
0
0
0
0
0
83W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99 •
0
0
o.
77 (> J
0
0
80 •
0
94V
85"-
94 i/-
82 •
0
0
=S = S5 = SS = S3S
, 2-Dichloroethane-d4
14.65 65
1974792 209.692 ng 97
RSI
C 157
-------
Benzene-d6 14.74 84 5834115 233.198 ng 100 ^
4-Bromo£luorobenzene 24.07 95 2019056 377.290 ng 100"
Toluene-d8 18.45 98 5754170 220.963 ng 93 ^
i
C 158
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K19C10
Sample Description: SAMPLE 2069 PR2 TNX 635
Date
Time
12/01/9
1545
Analysis Time: 1803
Analysis Date: 11/19/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
ehloromethane
Dichlorof luororaethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene Chloride
Carbon Disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-D.ichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibroraochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Broraoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
ra-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
I, 2-Dbroroo-3-chloropropane
2
4
6
10
10
5
6
8
7
9
8.
8
8
10
10
10
12
13
12
13
13
12
15
15
16
14
16
19
15
19
18
23
13
17
22
16
18
18
23
17
20
20
21
20
21
24
28
Tfre-
.53
.08
.07
.08
.37
.52
.53
.10
.48
qc
.63
.25
.92
.02
.02
.72
.72
.12
.02
.33
.12
.94
.40
.80
.97
.54
.12
.64
.35
.29
.37
.72
.90
.20
.57
.79
.62
.24
.49
.42
.65
.80
.90
.79
.72
.70
— 5-e —
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
84
\ -\
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
1215303
0
245951
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22116218
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3057771
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21861060
0
0
0
472509
21831
0
4272875
0
222968
0
1049303
386663
0
0
— 2*r
0.
12.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3513
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
331.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1048
0.
0.
0.
90.
3.
0.
174.
0.
45.
0.
75.
65.
0.
0.
*94—
000
912
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
33fl
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
858
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
.145
000
000
000
960
944
000
730
000
630
000
424
471
000
000
n.g
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ny ••
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng ,
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
ng
-+5 £)
0
75 V
0
0
0
0
0
0
o ,.x
Ofl h\
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98 •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99 •
0
0
0
95 •*
91 s
0
98 *
0
98 -^
0
95"
99 S
0
0
sssssssaEssssisssssssssr:
I,2-Dichloroethane-d4
13.58 65
1545385 231.074 ng 91
C 159
-------
Benzene-d6 13.63 84 4423584 229.441 ng 100
4-Broraofluorobenzene 22.95 95 1676817 390.641 no 100
Toluene-d8 17.35 98 4064813 188.978 ng 93
. o*&^
(0 ^Uc fffrf"* ^
C 1GO
-------
Quantitation Results
Raw Filename : K23C8
Sample Description: SAMPLE PR2 T/C 2070 IS& SURROGATE 261
Date : 12/01/S
Time : 1554
Analysis Time: 1826
Analysis Date: 11/23/93
Compound
Lab Name: MRI
User: RER
RT QM
AREA
Cone
REV
Chloromethane
Dichlorof luoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroothcinc
lodomethane
Trichlorof luoromethane
Mathylano Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Broraodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
1 , 4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Bromof orra
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
ra-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 , 2-Dbrorao-3-chloropropane
b
5
7
11
11
6
51
9
8
--in
9
9
8
12
11
11
13
14
13
14
14
11
17
16
17
16
17
20
16
20
20
24
14
19
23
18
19
19
24
18
21
22
22
22
22
25
30
. /b
.40
.02
.05
.37
.63
<5f»
.73
.52
A Q
.72
.80
.85
.35
.12
.35
.80
.79
.12
.09
.47
.47
.05
.52
.93
.10
.82
.27
.77
.54
.04
.50
.79
.04
.37
.15
.85
.79
.39
.59
.59
.00
.92
.00
.90
.90
.30
50
85
94
41
53
62
64
142
101
QA
43
76
96
63
96
96
83
62
43
97
117
43
83
63
75
130
63
129
93
107
97
124
78
75
173
43
43
164
83
91
112
106
104
106
106
117
157
17478092
0
2176831
0
0
0
1306043^
619062
0
CC Q 1 1
0
283818
0
0
0
0
0
0
107614
27427
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3760026
0
0
40922
101659
0
0
99641
0
59234
24824
71343
10068
0
23193
SSSSSSSSSSSSSBSSSSSES:
243
0
108
0
0
0
•\
64 •
0
11 *~>
— 31 03
0
89 •
0
0
0
0
0
0
91 •
78 fr-4-".
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99 '
0
0
88
-------
Benzene-d6 14.72 84 4213728 214.809 ng 100 "'
4-Broraofluorobenzene 24.05 95 1823288 382.871 ng 100 "
Toluene-d8 18.43 98 4539925 195.910 ng 93 ^
£J
»--•-*- *-+-<*At>'UI*4 fcC*-*-***- tA**lJIMS^l.. /•-——— •-/
C 162
-------
VOST DETECTION LIMITS
Source/analyte
Chloromethane
Dichlorofluoromethane
Bromomethane
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
lodomethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ng/trap
Tenax
<7.1
< 12.63
<8.5
0.0
< 13.88
<6.8
<8.1
<38.22
<10.9
< 15.86
<28.5
<9.0
<9.3
<8.0
0.0
<8.2
<9.7
<9.1
<18
<2.6
<2.0
<4.8
<0.5
<1.1
<1.7
<0.8
<7.69
<1.4
<5.47
<3.78
<1.3
<8.41
<3.8
<2.3
<2.1
<1.6
<5.2
<0.8
<1.8
<0.6
<0.6
<1.2
<1.4
<0.6
<0.4
<2.48
< 15.32
T/C
<9.7
<3.85
<4.0
0.0
<4.76
<4.9
<3.8
< 19.11
<3.1
<33.4
<24.9
<2.8
<4.8
<3.0
0.0
<2.6
<2.1
<4.5
<13.8
<1.3
<3.9
<3.7
<0.7
<1.7
<2.4
<1.1
<2.8
<1.4
<1.84
<1.29
<1.1
<2
<8.9
<2.2
<3.3
<3.0
<4.7
<2.0
<1.9
<2.1
<0.9
<1.3
<1.9
<0.7
<1.0
<0.75
<5.19
hC 163
-------
VOST RAW DATA
c
J2
U
CQ
U
c
3
a
eld blank
E
CO
CM
u
1
H
U
H
1
U
ca
C
f— i
c_)
H
*
1 Source/analyte
•0
ON
O
10
8
•n
T-H
•?
<3
•a
r-
vO
3
Ov
r~"
CO
*o
•a
co
o
X
in
o
»n
1 Chloromethane (a)
<0
00
co
V
vo
0
CO
V
CO
CM
v
| Dichlorofluoromethan
o
>n
2
00
o
ON
T-H
o
«^-
V
vO
iQ
<*i
CM
O
tl-
V
T-H
§8
co
| Bromomethane (a)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
u
*
lAcetonitrile
VO
V
vo
V
1-H
V
I**;
V
00
CO
V
VO
^
§8
1-H
V
| Acrylonitrile
ON
rr
V
vd
V
ON
V
00
VO
V
Ov
^-
V
oo
vr>
V
in
CO
V
§
V
| Vinyl chloride
00
co
V
1-H
00
V
•o
co
vq
CO
t-H
oo'
V
«*H
CO
V
00
V
•o
CO
H
~
t-
oo
V
I Chloroethane
•o
<0
*o
T— (
£
IT)
VO
T-H
s
00*
CO
V
CM
CO
CM
CM
co
CO
V
VO
a
1 lodomethane (a)
T_
CO
V
Ov
O
rH
V
co
V
ON
O
V
ro
V
o
V
T—«
CO
V
cs
o
o
V
•o
go
r~l
co
VO
V
| Methylene chloride
ON
•^
V
V
Ov
V
2543.338 d
Ov
^
V
cS
r-
T— •
vp
ON
V
ra
T-H
| Acetone
CO
CJ
V
0
Ov
V
•o
o
ON
V
VO
S
»n
o
ON
V
vo
T-H
<,
v?
| Carbon disulfide
00
^
V
'v
oq
V
CO
Ov
V
oo
1Q-
V
CO
Ov
V
oo
n-
V
S
V
1 1,1-Dichloroethene
0
CO
V
o
00
V
o
CO
V
*V
o
CO
V
o
on
V
o
co
V
00
00
V
[ 1,1-Dichloroethane
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
/_
1 1,2-Dichloroethene (to
VO
Csl
V
CM
00
V
vo
V
CO
V
VO
CJ
V
CJ
on
V
VO
V
Ov
VO
V
| t-l,2-Dichloroethene
•o
ri
o
Ov
V
1-H
V
ON
V
T-H
ft)
V
r-
Ov
V
T-H
V
S
>n
V
| Chloroform
10
^
V
ON
V
V
Ov
V
•«fr
V
T-H
OS
V
>o
V
o
VO
V
1 1,2-Dichloroethane
•o
•ff
>0
co
T-H
co
co
00
£
T-H
co
CO
Yj1
o
t^-
t^
r^
s
CN
T-H
ol
s
si
1 2-Butanone
co
T-H
V
vo
CJ
V
CO
T-H
OV
V
^
.
o
V
VO
CM
V
VO
p
s
V
1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ON
co
V
o
H
V
ON
CO
V
V
ON
ro
V
o
fM
V
ON
CO
V
$
V
| Carbon tetrachloride
t^
ro
V
V
CO
V
00.
V
t-
CO
V
oo
^f
V
t—
CO
V
^
CO
V
j Vinyl acetate
r-
o
V
o
V
o
V
V
o
V
0
V
t^
o
V
T^
V
0)
| Bromodichloromethan
f-
t-H
V
1-H
r— «
V
K-;
T-J
V
TH
1-H
V
t--
T— 1
V
1-H
V— 1
V
,-
V
vS
1-H
V
1 1,2-Dichloropropane
rf
(\j
V
r-3
V
rt
V
t-;
V
CM
V
t-
T-H
V
^
V
S3
co
V
I
1
O
•s
9
r-H
•8
T-H
T-H
V
2
V
V
oo
o
V
T-H
V
oo
o
V
T^
V
£
CO
V
| Trichloroethene
CO
fM
V
t-^
V
V
3
V
oo
fM
V
Ov
VO
t~
V
co
V
ON
t^
V
S>
[2-Chloroethyl vinyl eth
I-C 164
-------
^^
"S
3ST RAW DATA (cor
>
DO
C
JH
t3
d
c
3
CM
J^
g
S
2
"S
e
CO
fj
T— 4
CJ
H
1
u
H
U
pJ
I
o>
H
U
P
i
U
H
U
h?
,u
H
iurce/analyte
o
C/3
Tf
rH
V
TT
t-H
V
•*
TH
V
TT
t-H
V
TT
TH
V
i3-
V
Tf
V
CO
T—
CO
V
bromochloromethane
5
S
oo
T-H
V
rr
^*
V)
V
s
1-H
V
r~
•*
vi
V
s
T— <
V
r-
W
V)
V
»
T— «
V
5
vi
V
bromomethane
P
S
•
T-H1
V
S?
t~;
co
V
^
t— 4
V
00
t~;
CO
V
?5
1-H
V
00
t*-
co
V
3
1-H
V
S5
CO
V
bromoethane
P
TH
TH
V
CO
t-H
V
TH
rH
V
co
t-H
V
1-H
1-H
V
co
V
»-H
T^
V
«
co
V
1,2-Trichloroethane
T-H
d
V
TH
Tf
CO
V
M
V
TH
•*
co
V
M
V
TH
Tf
CO
V
O
V
1-H
•»
oo
V
UDichloro-2-butene
TH*
£
l^"
3
°°.
co
V
J5
VO
00
*o
T-H
1)
3
r— t
t«H
Os
5
0
TH
co
CO
oo
<0
o<
s
CN
•*
i
i—!
a
s
1
CN
3U3ZU;
O
o
S
i
I
3
£
r*"
o
V
22
rr
H
V
£
o
V
§
V
•o
t-
o
V
00
^
H
V
•n
c^
o
V
3
c4
V
sxachloroe thane
K
Os
*•
«n
V
tM
to
«i
T-H
V
VI
TH
CJ
2
Vs*
2
VI
t-H
v
o\
t— (
vi
V
CO
TH
V)
vd
TH
'^
ON
TH
vi
V
(N
<*1
vi
T^
V
A)
C
5?.
'-Dibromo-3-chloropro]
<^i
T-H
J3
OO
'£
'£
2
~3
§
jr
0
c
S.
€
U
JH
T3
-------
VOST DATA-BLANK CORRECTED
Source/analyte
Chloromethane (a)
Dichlorofluoromethane
3romomethane (a)
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Vinl chloride
Chloroethane
odomethane (a)
Trichlorofluoromethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
t-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dibromoethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 ,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Benzene
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Hexachloroethane
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Catch, ng
Run
1
Tenax
1427.487 b
324.879
75.424 c
144.378 a
993.771 a
90.74
2394.07
102.81
27.219
9.654
45.595
39.935
T/C
48.469 d
1132.853 d
14.915
d
42.116
7.106
128.648
0.632
3.358
1.397
2
Tenax
1261.417 a
205.924
4249.583 a
33.904
145.766
3.65
157.326
41.073
44.234
61.78
57.334
116.513
T/C
88.518
f
13.875
51.006
10.758
88.072
d
2.232
1.938
2.794
0.761
3
Tenax
d
2543.338 d
330.505
1048.145 e
82.175
3.944
174.73
45.63
74.202
65.471
T/C
192.644
58.478
368.637 d
74.476
d
25.523
4.913
136.249
4.64
16.31
1.628
7.026
2.492
3.079
0.967
20.215
I-C 166
-------
-G 167
-------
C.4.6 Kiln HCI/HF/PM
-C 168
-------
-C 169
-------
FILTER PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No. 4601-. 01.05.01 Client: EPA - Emission Inventory Branch (EIB)
Sampling Location: Kiln Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, Ohio
Analyst: Szydlo
Filter samples heated at 120" C Ear 2 3 hours, desiccated, and weighed to a constant
weight. Z
Filter Tare Wt. from tare weight data (q) /, &4 It,
COMMENTS:
FILTER + SAMPLE: Run No. Ptf£>J-2 Filter No. ^/^/l? Sample No. 2-(72 J
Date Time
Gross Wt. (a) /. /2*f~l // -^/-yj /itfff
Gross Wt. (q) I. /1 MQ /f - A/- -9 f /VfP
Gross Wt. (a) /. /3 VO it- J J -41 ff #00
Gross Wt. (q) /, / 2 *
-------
FRONT-HALF RINSES PARTICULATE MATTER ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No.:
Sampling Location:
4601.01.05.01
Kiln
Client: Emission Measurement Branch (EIB)
Facility: Belden Brick Co., Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst:.
Szvdlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
Beaker + Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt.(g)
Sample + Rinses Wt.(g)
Water Wt.(A) from Recovery Data:(g)
Acetone Wt.(g)
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (B):
Beaker No. Itf 2. 2 Sample No.
1 1 H
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
Gross Wt. (CT) 31.8011, _ S2. -05 -'
Gross Wt.(g).
Time
< b Gross Wt. (q) «3/.J?c7/>
, 0 Gross Wt. (g) *4I
O
i a
n
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (cr) ^1.
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g) *?/. 754, 7
Combined Blank = ( (Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = ff.000 ~J
COMMENTS:
mg/mL
FRONT-HALF RINSES: Run No..
Sample Volume + Acetone Rinses of Bottle:
273, t
Beaker No. 3>Oll Sample No. Z,OZZ
Beaker + Sample Residue Weights:
Date
(q) y9t>i ••
O, (} Gross Wt. (g) // tJ •
. 2
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for data entry (g) Iit9,
Combined Blank
COMMENTS
Beaker Tare Wt . from tare weight data (g) lie?. 8388
(Water Blank x A) + (Acetone Blank x B) ) / (A + B) = tf.000 -f
Time
\000
mg/mL
NOTE: Control beaker weight data and balance check data are on another form.
I-C
171
-------
BLANKS (FRONT-HALF PARTICULATE MATTER) ANALYSIS DATA
MRI Project No. 4601.01.05.01 Client: EPA/Emission Measurement Branch
Sampling Location: Kiln Facility: Belden Brick. Sugar Creek, OH
Analyst: Szydlo
Acetone and water samples evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in an enclosure
with filtered air; then, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight. Filters heated at
105° C for 2-3 hours, desiccated, and weighed to a constant weight.
ACETONE BLANK DETERMINATION: Run No. (s) : Ptt ~ I Beaker No._./*?>/ Sample No.
Acetone Volume Evaporated: Beaker + Evaporated Acetone Residue Weights:
Date Time
Beaker + Acetone Wt. (g) 2 oIt7 n I
Acetone Wt. (g) IIH, 9 " Gross Wt. (q) Xl-Ol-Hf " (
Acetone Wt./0.79 = mLs Acetone (A) : /*•! 5 • * Gross Wt. (q) Z^-OZ*? " / 5 &a
Beaker + Acetone Residue Gross Wt. used for blank determination (g)_
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g).
Net Wt.(B), Residue in Beaker (g) , & OOI
Acetone Blank (B x 1000/A) : & >OO 07 mg/mL for data entry or for computing combined blank
COMMENTS:
WATER BLANK DETERMINATION: Run No.(s): - Beaker No. Sample No..
Water Volume Evaporated: Beaker + Evaporated Water Residue Weights:
Date Time
Beaker + Water Wt.(g) Gross Wt.(g)
Beaker Tare Wt. (g) Gross Wt. (g)
Water Wt. (g) Gross Wt. (g)
Water Wt. = mLs Water (A) : Gross Wt. (g)
Beaker + Water Residue Gross Wt. used for blank determination (g).
Beaker Tare Wt. from tare weight data (g)_
Net Wt.(B), Residue in Beaker (g).
Water Blank (B x 1000/A) : mg/mL for data entry or for computing combined blank
COMMENTS: /i^ fff H/*J-tS »"<) •« t * S J*S s>M*S//'e ~4»rf+>
FILTER BLANK: Run No. (s) : /(S23 Filter No. *~r- 'Z Sample No.
Date Time
Gross Wt. (q) /, O 7^1 //-2/-3J /z *'
Gross Wt. (q) / , 0 7& & // -Z/-f * lg«*
Gross Wt. (g)/. tf 7 & f //• 22 -91 t/iftfff
Gross Wt. (q)/. 07
-------
JftN 26 '94 16:31 GALBRfllTH LABS 615-546-7209
P.2
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES, INC.
PHONE 615/546-1335 FAX 615/546-7209
LABORATORY REPORT
s . Szydlo
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
Sample Received:
Report Date:
12/06/93
12/15/93
Sample ID
Lab ID
Analysis
Sample Vol. ml Results
1025
E-3331
Chloride
HC1/ Sample
110
18.7
2117
2025
.E-3333
chloride
HCl/Sample
112
21.3
2449
/xg/ml
3025
E-3335
Chloride
HCl/Sample
114
Independent check standard
Matrix Spike
98.4% Recovery
97.0% Recovery
19.6
2302
1027
E-3332
Chloride
106
0.6
128
2027
£-3334
Chloride
110
1.0
216
3027
E-3336
Chloride
120
Independent Check Standard
Matrix Spike
102.5% Recovery
94.1% Recovery
0.7
169
Notes: The remainder of your results will follow.
CM:le
-C 173
LCTTSfl AND SHIPMENTS BY US. MAIL —P.O. BOX41610. KNOXVHXE.TN379«0.1«10. OTH£R CAfWICRS — 23233YC*>*DrtB DR. KNOXVU I F
-------
• MAY 03 '94 15;20 GALBRAITH LABS 615-546-7209. ..> • ; .•.••/• .... . .
... .P. 2-.. .
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES.
with speed - since 1950
REPORT
S". Szydlo
Midwest Research Institute
425-
Previous Lab I.D. E-33:31-3€
Report Date: 05/^3/94
,:.;•-.. •; .•/.•
| SAMPLE IO
1025
LAB ID
G-460
• ;''•':'' •••..•;!• ' '' '•'
ANALYSIS
'• . • ',"• \ • - ^ •
Fluoride •.";',
. /RESULTS
. 276 . ag/1
': • ...
.• . • -• : '
. . 2/ y/- 0 '".
f •
•10.27
Fluoride.
5-5
ng/Lt
2025
G-462
369-
6-.4.-
3025
G-464
•Fluoride:'
.311'
3027
G-465
Fluoride . '••'•
43-.
2323 Sycamore Drive
noxvfa, TN 37921-1750
Tri (615) 546-1335
Analytical serriets, worldwide
Hi _ r -< ^ /?
' -P.O. Sw 31610•'"•.
KnoxvUle, TN. 27950-1610
Fax: (615J54&7209:
-------
APPENDIX D.
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS
D.1 AMBIENT FILTER EQUILIBRIUM/CALIBRATION DATA
D.2 SAMPLE TRAIN CALIBRATION DATA
D.3 QA/QC AUDIT REPORT
D
-------
D
-------
D.1 AMBIENT FILTER EQUILIBRIUM/CALIBRATION DATA
D
3
-------
D
4
-------
Filter Equilibration Data
Equ
Er
Date
tc-11-ft
It// f?3
'2-2-11
ilibrati
d
Time
*fo
Cft^O
WQ&
on Peri
Bee
Date
;*-**>
10/3. (13
,2-/-?5
od
jin
Time
*?v
<^3^
}?*
T
Max.
^t
ZT^
ztf
-zi.S
empera
Min.
r3./
23.3
Z£9
ture (c
Avg.
2.'3-/
•7^ U
Ztf
C)
Meets
Q.A. ?
•^Z-o
y«
$V
Relc
Max.
V^
vt.l
^'^
stive H
Min.
V^,;
ts.i
v>>
umidit
Avg.
v^^
WC..C?
Y5^
y (%)
Meets
Q.A. ?
*ko
y<-5
^
By
7^
&
M
3?
Comments:
D
-------
Balance Check Data
Date
Time
Balance Data
Balance
Type
MRI
I.D. No.
Class S
Weight
Calibration Data
Balance
Reading
Difference
Meets
Q.A. ?
By
-7-2/6
ooo. <*&
oo
1 oecr.
(tooo.oo
3,
O-OO
0. (O
. oo
O-IO
Comments:
D 6
-------
D.2 SAMPLE TRAIN CALIBRATION DATA
D
-------
D
8
-------
9ATE:
CALIBRATED BY:
METER BOX NUMBER:
BAROMETER PRESSURE:
MET TEST METER NUMBER:
WET TEST METER PRESSURE DROP:
ROTAMETER SETTING:
»E* TEST METE? 3AS VOLUME:
OR-' TES< METER GAS VOLUME:
DRY GAS METER SAMPLE CALIBRATION DATA
11/17/93
HARMON
WET TEST .1ETER »3AS TEMP:
- -DRV TEST METER-
INLET 6AS TEMP:
RUN1
RUN2
RUN3
i-2538
RUN1
RUN2
RUNS
RUN1
RUN:
RUNS
RUN1
RUN2
RUNS
RUN1
INITIAL:
FINAL:
VOLUME"
PUN2
INITIAL:
FINAL:
VOLUME=
RUNS
INITIAL:
FINAL:
VOLUME=
RUN I
RUN2
RUNS
ft UNI
RUN:
RUNS
VOST-1
2'3.47
29.47
29.47
1.9
1.3
1.3
75
75
15
15
15
0
15.01
15.01
15.01
29.97
14.96
29.97
45.11
15.14
76
75
76.9
77.3
78
HUE C'F RUN:
RUN1
RUN2
902.7
914.5
911.5
LITERS PER MINUTE=
RUN1
RUN2
RUNS
,9976736
.36:5:
.9965SS
AVESA6E RATIC:
PUN1
RL'N2
RUNG
1.005507
1.00962
.993916
1.00468!
-------
5 CONSOLS: CALIBRATION UI^H CRITICAL ORIFICE
PROJECT »
Date:
Operator:
Console -1
Ir. itial DGfl Volume
Final OGfi Volume
N&'r: DGI1 Volume '.'ljm>
OOP! Temp-? r-.it u re, Deg.F;
Initial I n i e t
Final Inl->t
Enibial Outlet
Final Outlet
•:•'•-! i'.|»-j DGi1 reniptra tui e ' tm '
!"!' . rice Delta H, inche<; '/).•;.
8 a r o i n e i: r i • : P r e ' j •; u r e . , i n . H cj
Critical Orifice Inlet Temp., Deq.F:
IniL-i.il
Final
.V.'i^rag1.1 Critical Or if ii..--- To let feifiij,
P u in p <-' a c u u in , i n . H g
Critic.-il Orifice Volume (Vcr i.std.*"1
DGfl Volume -,'Vm -:atd.)'>
DGf1 Calibration Factor CY.)
Orifice Delta H>2
Average DGH Calibration Factor' (Y)
Average Orifice Delta Htf
*•/•- 27. From Average Y Criteria:
P e r c e n t D i f f e r e n c e F r o m A v e rag e Y
Tolerance Result
<-/'-- y/. From Previous Y Criteria:
F' •; r c e nt D i f f >•? r- :< n u ••? ,7 r o m F1 r e v i o u s Y
4601010:501 On rice H A 4
11/15/03 Oriri:? K: . 46o-44
NEAL Clrev:ou>; Y; L.^'2:'
HI 2
Run 1 Run 2 Run J i
.
507.400 513.445 i l5Jr'.ri":; '
•; 1 3 . 44.'3 :: i j . 3 1 !3 525 . 5'?^ '
r ! ~ i '
,.-)/... | i. jyu i
i
oO • dO Ci
30 Ul :J2
7b.3 ; ?--.5 \ .-8.J
£00' .-;•)'.• KO1.
1.200 J.200 i .200
•i/' ' ':••.:• '>:
>' '3 i - o -. .-.
... O i " • • j O
,- • t- - ,-, 1 ...
19 j 1'^ 1?
' 1
5.93' '3. '334 5.934 i
5.374 i 3.300 3. J58T i
•..or.' ! :.oib ...MIL i
L.S3G | i.335 1.331 '
1.017
1 . 334
!
.21 .11 .00 I
PASS PAb£ PA'JS j
!
I
'. o 1 e r a nee (. A v e r a g e > K e -.•< u i '•;
D 10
-------
METHOD 5 CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL JRIFTCE
PROJECT 8 460101050l
Oats: 11/15/93
Operator: HARMON
Console ,4 Ml3
0 v L i7 i C 9 X »
P.- -1>.'ion : V :
•fun i. ' Run
Ini-ial DGM Volume
Final DGM Volume
Met DGrl Volume Vm
580. •OS i
5.-" 8 n
DGM T'Jffip'iral'jre, Deq.!-:
Initial Tniec
i-\n,iL in It.11:
Inicidi Outlet
Or if ire Uel-na
3,ir Oinetv'lC P'r"
;.~ , i ;v i .„ _ 1 0 .- L r i c t.-1 I ri 1 *^ c
In ib
'•'i
•:.-•. 'ri-ial Orifice Vein
DGM Vc-1
DGM G.il Jvrat
Or
.-: •.•••.? rag* DGM Cal ibr.ik
Average Or
:• / - Z' ," F r o m A v e r a g e Y
PC- r 'i e n t D i f f e r e n c e
'''rMnij'^^i'n-.-iod'- ^ ''>'"' ! ^••"''' '-'.'•^
H, inches w.c. .''^l^ \ , '.'I'S j .930
e2-2u.r8.. in.Hu I'?. 4" ! ^.'-P .r:-.4.'
1.1 1 | o" ^ 6.3 6G
nai ..3 ' t'io >-.S
.•'acu.um. in.Mg , l1:1 j l"j : i'7'
i i 1
ume • VID '...tdi.' j 3.382 | j. 389 5.395
ion Facto.- 'Y< j 1.00" ; 1 . ^Ob 1. 00 '4
if ice Delta H? I l."l" j l."1.r ] . ~?4
ion Factor ' Y '• 1.006 |
if ice Dei ba H'3 1. rl? j
i
Criteria: j
From Average Y .13 j . O.J . !•!
Tolerance Reoulc jPAS
jPrtSb"
I PASS
5".' Fr'ijin Pr^vioLi-j Y Criberi.i: i
rrtjn !; D L f f i?reiv:t? Froin Pryviiju-i V i
Tolerance '.Average.1 r\'e'_-ul.. |i-A5'J
D 11
-------
METHOD 5 CONSOLE CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL ORIFICE
PROJECT « 4bO 101050.1 Or if
1C'.; S Ab
Date: .L1/1&/93 Orifice K: .42239
Opri-.-jtc-.-: H Art PI ON P,-^viouc Y; l.'VO.i
I n .1 :: i a J OGfl V
;• Lnal DOR ',
ilec
000 r-emp^vatu-re, D*g
initial
Final
Lonsole ^ MS
Run 1 '":uri
i
! 1
2 i Run ": i
1 i
oiuoit? j 54.900 £.0.50c, i6. i2a j
0 1 Lime i i-.0. 50i;.. ; o
i
DGil Voluiiit? ''.'in.1 1 5.60fc
1
i i
.F: !
Inlet 83
Cnlet 81
Initial Outlet i "7
: i
rill.il Outlet 77
v.-t-ragt; IiGPi
"(f- . fi ; 6 :.it>l ,;
iJMroiftf? tc ic
C r i ': i c a 1 0 r . f i c e I :• 1
In
Average Critical Or I
1 empera fcur» •- tm • ."•'?. 5
-i- i
, 1 - - .
t
P r 0 -a j ;.; re., ; n . H • j j 2 ~J . •'•• 1
ot Temp. . Lieq. F:
it i.il '19
Final 70
fiCf? Cnlh?T fifuiij. i-/;. '5 ,
Pump Vacuum, in.Hy 19
: i
•:,_ £23 "l . ",;..." '
=; . -j 2 2 i i -. '•• ' '•
i i
i i
! i
30 3i |
81 31 i
- .• !
"o ]
78.8 -'9.5 ;
--„-. .:.,-„ 1
. 930 . ?80 i
.j9. 41 29. 41 j
i
70
70 ~'l j
"•"".•) '-j.'-~ ;
19 :•.' j
i 1
Critical Orifice Volume I'Vcr <.stdJ> 5.400 5.393 5.395 I
D G PI V o 1 u in e C U m is t d ."' ,' 5.40 fc
DGfl Calib'f
Average DGI1 Calibr
Average
+ / - 2 % Fro m A v e r a q e
F' y T' c a n t D i f f e r e n c
•i-/- 5X From Previous
P >j r c <•? n t EI i f f e r e 1 1 c h?
Tolerance
1
.1 1 1 o n 1- a c t o r ( '.-' '> . 9 9 '-.4
Orifice Delta liQ 1.327
at ion Factor (Y> .996
Orifice Delta H@ 1.830
Y Criteria:
e From Average Y .34
Tolerance Result F'ftSS PASS
Y Criteria: !
Fvoifl F reviijij.-- Y . /'•'}
'.' A V «? V a l) fe .' R f ;i L! i C P n S G
M D 12
5. 429 5.431 !
.99'1 -9'j.': 1
1.832 1.831 j
1
. 1 .3 . 2 1 j
PAbb |
-------
ilETHOD 3 CONSOLE CALIBRATION ulITH CRITICAL JFiFICE
Date:
Operator:
Console M
Initial DGrl Volume
Final DOC1 Volume
Net DGP1 Volume -.Vm.>
DGfl Feinpera ture, Deg.F:
Initial Inlet
Fin.- 1 Inlet
Initial Outlet
Fin.il Outlet
Averse,* DGi"! i'fmpt.-ra -I'.ri' 'tin1
Flint-, second i
I'ri'-C'-' Delta M, inches w.c.
v.i.-"0:ne'C'." to / re i'iur'u . . in.Hg
_rj. '"leal Orifice Inlet Temp., Deg.F:
In it 1.1 1
Final
Av»r-aij^ i" .- 1 i: t ,; .-< i. Or if ice Inlet Temp.
i" uuiij Vacuum, in. Mg
C v i !; '. i : ..i 1 0 r i f i c e Volume ( V u r '! 3 1 J .) ')
OGN Volume ',Vm ''std.O
Dun Cal L brat ion FJ<: U-jv r/ '
Orifice Delta H'ol
hver'.i.je DGfl Calibration Factor CY>
Average Orifice Delta US
+ '- 2" From Average Y Criteria:
P f r c e n t D i r' f e r e nee F r o m A v e r ,a g e Y
Tolerance Result
+/-• 5": From Previous Y Criteria:
Percent D i f ferern;^ From F'reviou: Y
Idle: ance •-. Avei age.- Kesuj c
11/16/93 Orifiie K:
HARHON Previous Y:
N7
Run 1 | .";un 2
\
SI 0.1 00 ! 816.20S
316.203 ! 322.329
6.108 j 0.121
i
f
i
^ 3-:
*e 79
•"' "i ""• ' 'i"1
O .- . ~" O .' . '"j
60') 600
1.200 ' '.. :oo
29.41 29.41
69 70
70 70
69.5 70.0
19 | 19
5.963 5.961
5.S80 5.392
L.014 1.012
1..8J3 1.334
1.012
1.834
1
.21 .05
PASS PASS
1
.3" I
F ASo
. J6tr-14
1.021
K'un 3
1
32 J. JjJ9
i 823.456
I
6. 127
|
-( _,
1 ~ *~
'J • j
"9
80
i 0 . . 0
60'j
! 1.200
! 29.41
i
71
70.5
19
5.95U
5.895
I. Oil
i . o J b
. 15
PASS
D 13
-------
ilETHOD 3 CQNSOLI CALIBRATION WITH CRITICAL OR!7 ICE
PROJECT Jt 4601010501 Orifice H
Date: 11/17/93 Orifice K:
u D >
0 G H C .ill b r .11 i o n F j c t o r '•'. Y .•
Orifice Delta IK-3
iivii-'.igi/ Dljfl Calibration Factor (.Y.J
Average Orifice Delta H(2
5.411
5.330
1.015 j
I.o72 I
1.013
1.871
5.409
5.409 I
5. 343 ,
i.3t.9 i
2".' From Average Y Criteria: j
:'ercijnt Difference Froi/i Average Y i
Tolerance Result (PASS
j
S/C From Pr'V'tou-; Y Criti->ri.i:
-ri.'onk D i f t'e,- t>ni:i.- Froio Previous ','
To 1 erance (Average * Rt-uui c j PnSo
PASS
. 10
D 14
-------
I1ETHOD 5 CONSOLE CALIBRATION iJITH CRITICAL -JF;iriC£
PROJECT f» 4i-,010LO'-30l
Dace: LI. -17/93
Operator: HARnON
Consols .1 N9
Cii"l?!.0i f* A4
0 r . f ic - I;:
Run 1
•'tin
I Run 3
[ n j 11 a ] DGM l>o 1 time
i•!::.. :oo
Fin.il DGfl Volume
Net .Ob it Volume 'V>i>.''
C.ij'll FiJ mpv-r.it uve, Deg.F:
Initial Inlet
Final Inlet
In i. : iai Ou ci et
F iiia I HI 1 1 [<''r
A ve r u q e - Ci G r1. Tempera'; u r 5 • '- .n '
Time, -j.ee oi HI-.,
Orifice Delta H, inches w.c.
Ba r oiiietv i •; .':'vt? i iu re . , i ."> , Hg
-• • ;ica] Or if ice Inlet Temp., Oevji.F,1;
[ n 1 1 1 a 1
F i n a I
.•,.,^,-,,j,J i: ,-i M,:ri • (Vifici-? [nl*i; Tsmp.
,'uiilp r,:ilL. ULliD, 3 I'l . Hq
C r 1 1 1 c a 1 0 r i f ice V o 1 u m e ', V <- v ' u t • j .> .•
DGfl Volume (Vm '.'v^tdj..'
OIJPI C.il ibrat LOIV F.i-:':or •''' •
Qr-j. fj.ce Delta H'li
Aver.igo DOPl CA librnt ion Factor i V"!
Average Orifice Delta M@
-•-./-• 2/i F) om Average Y Criteria:
Percent Difference From Average Y
Tolerance Result
j 135.255 j 141.300
I 6.055 i b.v45
i
I
3J 31
32 (' 32
' 7" .' 7X
1 ! -
•":•''.•''} ' .jOO
1 "S'l i ' "'SO
J. • *_ W.1 \ 1 J. • fc. ij V
| 2V. 4' 2V. 4 7
i? 70
70 i 7>j
'• £,''}. 5 ': 70. '<
19 19
5.97b 5.':<73
5.357 5.045
L.02C I.OZ2
1.021
1.911
1
.05 .12
PuSS IPASS
(•r. ?r.-;
G. J6j
'-•I
' '-'
30. ^
.'-.•00
1. 250
.?•?.- r
' 'J
V ,".
IV
5.973
5.356
1 . 020
i
,o:
PASS
F ;•• i j m F' r e v i on •? Y C r 1 1 1? r i .i :
>n !• Di f fereno? Frijm Pr^vLiju'- Y
Tolerance (Avei age ' RecuiL JPML.5
l.O'S
D 15
-------
ORIFICE BRACKETING WORKSHEET
COHSGL£ * N'j
A3
factor
At,
Project 46010105 Orifice No.
Date 1.1/17 93 Orifice NO.1.
Operator HARMON Orifice No.
0 - f i ' : e H u rn b e r A 4 0 r i f i c e N 0' . 2
'.jrri'. i i act. or l."21
Final GGfl Volume
0'i-f i :e Hi ' Ov-fn.-'? »2
135.&32 160.4(04
Initial DGM Volume ; 148.600 i55.300 !
Me i: CiG'T V illume '• Vrn '! : ~'. 132 j 4. ;6a '
1
in. Out l.i GiT Tern p. !
[ n I e t • !
initial
f : n a 1
Ou fclst
30. 0 31.0 i
I
in i '; Lai 7:3. 0 "S. '.• ,
•in r. ; -'9. ••„• 79.0 |
Avq. DGi'l Temp
Tune, ^ec .
Orifice OH, in. H2U
Saro. Press.. . in . Hg
Room temp. , Deg . F
r'uinp Vacuum, in. Hy
.,,,, ,ytd.
Vm Csfcd.»
V F a >: 1; o r •:. b r a c k e t .*
+/- 2X criteria
Pei- cent of V
/V.8 80.0 .'
600.0 j 600.0 i
1.30 .60
29.47 29.47
70.0 i 70.0
I'1 19
i
7.049 4.574 i
G.900 4.498
1.022 1.017
.07 .4i
PASS PASS
. 3573
D. 16
-------
TYPE S PITCT TU3Z INSPECTION DATA 7CPJ-1
Pitot tube assembly level? \S yes r.o
Pitot tube openings ca-aced?
ves (ex-lain belcw) \s
no
o, =
Si =
Y =
«5C), 32 =
, A= 0,1/00 (i-.}
= = A sir. r =
w = A sir. 3 =
O
(ir..); (
Ccnments :
ves
p-^OT TUBE 5
(T
10ȣ!7UOIKAI r
TUSE
V '
D.J4 O <0. < 0.55 O
(3/H U7)' (2/8 IK.)
DATE
/I//6
c-^
NAME
r
r
A
L_
A.-SIDC
A
j _ J_ _ | PA
NOTE:
l.OS B.<
'»"'
TUBE AXIS
\
FACE
OP1X1NG
1IUKSYCXSE
TUBE AIIS
o s
a A
0 A
-------
TYPE S PITCT TU3Z INSPECTION DAT.-. FORM
Pi tot. tube assemhlv level?
ves
r.c
Pitot tube openings damaged?
yes (explain belcw)
Si =
J 1 «io°),
0 o ,^ = c,
32 =
w = A sin 3 =
P. = 01 WO
O,Q III (
Q (
Consents:
-3 =
-
) ; (<0.12:
); (<0.03:
(7. i
no
CH.librc.~icn rscui^red?
V£S
nc
PITOT TUBE 5 fl\ - | DATE // -
NAME
Q
F o-
TUS£
O.ifl CX <0. < 0.95 CM
.O' ~(2/a IN.)
V-'T
_li
/' ^
u \
L_
A-J1DE
! 'pjs
•jo ^ r^
~\ 1~ l "uii'"«!sl.Q.
z=f2:-H^
A
MOTE:
1.05 D;< ? <1.50 :.
'A ' '3
1
I
B-S1SC fUME
TRAaSYEWE
TUBE
r ^ N
"Q x oi> i V "~
\
— FA« _J
1OPJX1NCI
8
ROW
X" ">«
r
-------
Pitor
Pitot
TY~?Z S PITGT TUBE INSPECTION DATA FORM
:ube asse.T-blv level? v ves
no
tube openings damaged?
yes (explain belcw)
V/ n
no
a i —
Si =
T =
3
S2 =
O (
w = .-.
s xn Y =
sin 3 =
Or
O
(i
(ir.
); (<0.125 i.-..}
); (<0. 02125 ir..)
T3 =
Calibration recruired?
PITOT TUBE =
ves
LQKg'.TUOlXAl. " <*•
TUSC AJUS C«"
0.« CM <0. < Q.9S CX
x7)' (3/Z IK.)
A OR 3
DATE
A
L.
J T_
• i
A-SIDC PUKE I I
\ KOTf:
i.os o,<
PUKE
TUBE AI1S
^>—
\
=0
:«!*::«
fA££
OP£H!MG|
i ?UNE£
IJUKSYCZSi
TUBE A::S
V
->
**
-------
TYPE S PITCT TUBE INSPECTION DATA 7CEM
Pitot tube assemblv level?
V£S
r.o
Pitot tube ccer.ir.c-s carnaced?
yes (explain belcw)
Si =
T =
z = A sir. r =
w = A sir. 3 =
), 32 =
= O °,
Q. Q2Z2(ir.
Q.Q (ir.
A =
} ; (<0.125 ir..}
); (<0. 03125 ir..}
PA = 0.3/70 (ir..),
Ccrrjr.er.ts :
ves
r.o
PITOT TUBE =
(T
? °^
TU5C Xlli
a.w o
-------
?itc~ tube assem
TYPE S PITCT TUBE INSPECTION 2ATA FGRM
mi lv ieveL?
ube oenngs camacec.?
ves
ves
r.c
explain belcw)
2.
I ° «5C), 32 = 2.
=
O,
(ir..); (£E I
OP1X1NG|
TUBE AI'.S
NAME
-------
TYPZ S PITCT TU3Z INSPZCTICN 2ATA rCEM
sir.blr' level? ^"^ ves
Pitee tube asse _
Pitct tube openings damaged?
o
no
yes (explain belcw)
(<10VJ) ,
32 =
7. = A sin v
w = A sin 3
= Q.Q2
(i
n.) ; (
-------
GOOSENECK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Date /)
i 7
Ambient Temp.
Job Number.
Barometer
29. (J/
. Hg
Calibrator
Pyrometer No.
Y~
Reference Thermometer
Serial Number
-/T4
Calibration Method: Ambient Water Bath with ASTM Thermometer
Goose-
neck
T.C.
No .
31
-------
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATIOH DATA FORM
Stack Thermocouple No._
Barometer
Pyrometer
Temperature
F
IZ6?
lc(^.^
112,?
^/O^ c°
...
Temperature
Difference
F
C.6"
'•V
7.9
Ll,C
Temperature
Difference
% *
Cl ^77^ 2T
G^ur(/o
C.'lctC *
/ f /rVc/;
(ref.temp
., F + 460) - (pyro.temp., F + 460)7
(ref.temp., F + 460) J
* 100 <. 1.5%
D 24
-------
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job
No. V6C!-0(
Date //' // - 93
Ambient Temp. /
Cal
Avg
i bra tor J^P^
. Stack Temp.
^'QS^'O/ Stack Thermocouole No. '6 /
\l nrst
Barometer ' 7" C/o '
\} F Pvrometer No. yOT
l^dS Reference Instrument
. , Stainless Steel
VoC/ F Calibrated' Pyro
JT "<1U1
j ^ c 7'V'
;
-------
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Job No.
Date
7oO/ -
Stack Thermocouple No.
Barometer _ 2$. <>l(
.in.Hg
Ambient Temp.
Calibrator
Pyrometer No.
Avg . Stack Temp.
Reference Instrument: Heated
Stainless Steel Core with
Calibrated Pyrometers
Reference
Instrument
Temperature
F
;?<7. ^
X3CC
~^..L,
392 C
Pyrometer
Temperature
F
J3G.O
^c-c ^r
^orr
395" ^
Temperature
Difference
F
a,-r
fi.z
Z.LI
^.£
Temperature
Difference
% *
O, ^/?^
0, Vccc^
O,^ ?-? ^
C,4f3/?
(ref.temp
., F + 460) - (pyro.temp., F + 46oTT
(ref.temp., F + 460) J
* 100 <. 1.5%
D 26
-------
Job No.
Date
STACK THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
Stack Thermocouple No.
Barometer
II/U/Q5
_in.Hg
Ambient Temp.
Calibrator
Pyrometer No.
Avg . Stack Temp.
ty 3C
Reference Instrument: Heated
Stainless Steel Core with
Calibrated Pyrometers
Reference
I nstrument
Temperature
F
'?«-,4
2°6 ^
r. I<\K%
0, s-r/? /c
(ref.temp
., F + 460) - (pyro.temp., F + 46o7j
(ref.temp., F + 460) J
* 100 <. 1.5%
n
-------
-------
D.3 QA/QC AUDIT REPORT
D 29
-------
D 30
-------
Interoffice Communication
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSITITUTE
12/5/94
TO: Roy Neulicht, Rick Marinshaw
FROM: Dennis Hooton*
RE: Beldon Brick
>
The QA review and associated action items has been completed for the subject report These items are
summarized below: *
i
1. VOST blank corrections really only impact a few compounds in the volatiles list. These have been
summarized in the QA Report (enclosed). I also indicate in the QA report that undetected
compounds would be reported as "< -1-2 ug/dscm." You may want to include the "VOST RAW
DATA-KILN" table, provided by Rick a few weeks ago, in the final report appendices, which lists
the analytical detection limits (as ng per trap) for each chemical.
2. The SV Lab report was put in final form for the most recent draft.
3. VOST surrogate recoveries were calculated and added to the revised QA Section (Section 5 of the
report). In addition, I added results of a performance audit sample to Section 5.
4. Cr and Ni results were verified for all runs and I added a statement to this effect in the QA report.
Rick provided "historical" data for field blank metal trains. I could not tell if filters were included in
all blank runs; however, Cr blank results for the Brick Kiln study are consistent with past tests and Ni
did show a background level similiar to the Brick Kiln blank in 1 of 3 previous tests. These historical
data are not discussed in the report and probably don't need to be discussed.
5. I reviewed and edited the QA Section of the Report The text (4 pages) was retyped and 2 additional
tables (VOST surrogate recoveries and VOST audit sample results) were added. The revised copy is
enclosed.
6. A QA Audit Summary report is enclosed. I revised the text to reflect the additions and improvements
that were made. The general finding of the QA Report is that, with few minor exceptions, the Test
Data are complete, traceable, and accurately reported. In general, data quality objectives were met
for all analyses.
7. Follow-up items from the draft audit report were addressed, specifically:
• Maximum emission rates for undetected volatile compounds are discussed in the final QA Report (see
item 1 above).
• Footnotes in Table 3-19 actually refer to the "VOST RAW DATA" Table provided by Rick. I would
recommend that all the footnote references be omitted and that the 4 compounds listed in the QA
Report and benzene be simply flagged as "estimated" concentrations due to blank corrections and, in
the case of benzene, the use of an extended calibration curve.
• Cd, Co, Pb, Sb, and Se should be flagged as estimated concentrations due to the relatively high
background corrections (>50% of the total response in most cases).
• Semivolatile Detection limits should be calculated as English units for the table on page 3-36.
1-D 31
-------
Regarding Rick's memo of 11/11/94. please note the following:
• Footnotes on Table 3-19 should be eliminated and the four chemicals listed in the QA report and
benzene should be qualified as "estimated" values.
• Margie's footnote No. 3 for sample No. 1069 refers to chloromethane, not iodomethane. Footnote the
chemicals listed below as "estimated" values.
• I would recommend that you report all data, but flag chloromethane, bromomethane, iodomethane,
methylene chloride, and benzene as "estimated" values due to analytical difficulties.
• 2-Hexanone may be considered as a non-detect or trace amount (below calibration range) for the first
run data. *
I-D - 32
-------
QA/QC AUDIT REPORT
The subject report (in draft final form) was independently reviewed and representative data were audited
by the project QA Coordinator. The review was based primarily on the QA Objectives for Measurement
Data (Table 6-2) of the Draft Site-Specific Test Plan/Quality Assurance Plan for Testing at Plant 6 Belden
Brick Company, dated October 22,1993. Derived emission rates were verified by manual calculation on
randomly-selected data points for the VOST, metals, semivolatiles, HC1, Cb, and HF tests. In addition,
analytical performance samples were introduced during sample analyses.
Based on the reviews and audits described above, and with the few exceptions noted below, test results
were found to be complete, traceable, and correctly reported. In general, data quality objectives were met
for all analyses. Specific comments, review findings, and performance sample results are summarized
below by type of analysis.
VOST ANALYSES
• Several additions were made to the VOST sections of the report to complete the QA/QC evaluation,
specifically:
1. Surrogate recoveries (as percent of spiked amount added) have been added to the QA/QC section of
the report (Table 5-8). Average recoveries for the four surrogates ranged from 79% to 145 %, and the
precision of these determinations varied by less than 16% RSD in all cases. The 4-
bromofluorobenzene surrogate recovery averaged 145%, slightly above the 130% objective.
2. Based on an instrument detection limit study, stack gas concentrations for undetected compounds
would be less than 1-2 ug/dscm.
3. Blank corrections were applied to several of the listed compounds because of background levels found
in laboratory method blanks. The blank corrections impact only a few of the listed compounds, as
summarized in the table below. Results for these four compounds should therefore be considered as
"estimated values" only.
SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS AFFECTED BY BLANK CORRECTION OF VOST RESULTS
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Blank Correction (ng)
129
114
84
29
Equivalent to
Concentratration
(ug/dscm)
6
6
4
2
Average Reported
Concentration
(ug/dscm)
29
6.4
4.1
0.3
4. Footnotes (a) through (e) in Table 3-19 "Kiln Fjnission Test ResultsVOC's (metric units) are not
applicable to this table. The footnotes are analyst's comments on specific data points within the
VOST analyses, and do not necessarily apply to the summarized data report. However, benzene
results should be flagged as estimated or minimum concentrations because sample concentrations
exceeded the acceptable calibration range of the instrument. The analyst took action to try to bracket
the sample concentrations with additional standards and special techniques to provide better estimates
of the high benzene concentrations.
!-D 33
-------
VOST ANALYSES (continued)
• Because chloromethane and bromomethane were found in the system blanks, data for these two
analytes were determined by the analyst to be suspect. Chloromethane was found in at least one of
the field samples at - 10 times the approximate average amount found in the blanks and could
possibly be a true emission; however, the majority of field samples appear to have levels of
chloromethane and bromomethane roughly equivalent to the background levels demonstrated by the
field blanks.
• A performance audit sample (an independent check standard spiked onto a clean VOST trap) was
analyzed with the field samples with the following results: methylene chloride, 118% accuracy at 400
ng on-column; 1,1*, 1-trichloroethane, 117% accuracy at 400 ng on-column; 14 other analytes (not
found in the field samples) were correctly identified and reported to within accuracies of 103% to
151% at 400 ng on-column. These results are summarized in Table 5-9 of the report.
• The benzene emission rate for Run 1 was verified from the analytical data and the reported stack data
(sample volume and gas flow rate).
SEMIVOLATILE ANALYSES
Surrogate recoveries for the SV trains met the 50-150% objective for recovery, The additional solvent
rinse of the filter support assembly produced discolored matrices and erratic surrogate recoveries, but
indicated no significant concentrations of the target analytes upon analysis. Therefore, the data
quality objectives were met for the primary sample results.
An independent audit sample (check standard) was used to spike a laboratory control XAD and water
sample prior to co-extraction with the actual field samples. The same check standard was analyzed
directly to verify instrument calibration and chemical identification. Out of 43 spiked analytes from
the target analyte list, 42 (98%) had accuracies ranging from 80% to 106% by direct analysis (2,4-
dinitrophenol was the only exception at 60%), 39 of the 43 spiked analytes were within 50% to 150%
for the spiked XAD sample, and 37 of the 43 spiked analytes were within 50% to 150% for the
spiked water sample. Complete results for the performance audit samples are presented in Table 5-6.
Phenol emission rates for Run 1 was verified from the analytical report through the derived emission
factors by manual calculation.
!-D 34
-------
METALS ANALYSES
• Front-half results for the metals train samples indicated significant background levels for cadmium,
cobalt, chromium, manganese, nickel, lead, antimony, and selenium. The blank levels also appear to
represent minimum levels found in all the field samples, indicating that the field samples also have a
reproducible background contamination. Based on the blank filter levels, background corrections
were applied to the cumulative concentrations (front/back half combination) of the samples prior to
deriving emission rates. For chromium, manganese, and nickel, the background corrections are
relatively insignificant to the total amount found for the combined front and back half train samples;
however, the background corrections for cadmium cobalt, lead, antimony, and selenium represent a
significant proportion of the total amounts found (> 50% in most cases). Therefore, derived stack
gas concentrations for these 5 elements (Cd, Co, Pb, Sb, Se) should be considered as estimated
concentrations.
• Analysis QC samples, including an independent check standard and an ICAP interference check
sample, showed accuracies within the QA plan data quality objectives of 90-110% and 75-125%,
respectively.
• Analysis of a spiked blank train (both front half and back half) demonstrated recoveries within the
70-130% QA objective.
• Analysis of a NIST Reference Standard filter indicated accuracies of 70-110%.
• Derived emission test results for chromium and nickel were verified from the analytical data and
calculation of derived concentrations (ug/dscm) were checked for all 3 runs.
HF. HC1. Ch ANALYSES
Check standards and matrix spikes were analyzed by Galbraith Laboratories as part of the analysis run.
These results showed accuracies/recoveries within the 80-120% objective for the chloride analyses; no
check standard or matrix spike was indicated for the fluoride analysis.
Duplicate analysis of one sample per matrix was not indicated for the chloride/fluoride analyses; however,
the individual results from all 3 runs varied by less than the 30% RPD objective for sample precision.
HF, HC1, and Cl2 emission rates for Run 1 were verified by manual calculation.
I-D
-------
36
-------
APPENDIX E.
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
E-2
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Reference: Belden Brick Company Plant 6
November 8 to 13,1993
EMISSION TEST CALCULATIONS-General, filterable PM-10, Run 1, kiln stack
= stack area, in sq. in.
= area of nozzle, in sq. ft.
= percent moisture, by volume, measured in stack gas
= pitot tube coefficient
= average pressure differential of orifice meter, in inches water
= average velocity head, in inches water
= nozzle diameter, in inches
= estimated dry molecular weight, in Ib/lb-mole
= dry mole fraction of stack gas
= wet molecular weight of stack gas, in Ib/lb-mole
= standard pressure, in inches Hg
= barometric pressure, in inches Hg
= stack gas static pressure, in inches water
= absolute stack pressure, in inches Hg.
= wet volumeteric stack flow at stack conditions, in ACFM
= volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
= sampling time, in min.
= dry gas meter temperature, in degrees F.
= stack temperature in degree F.
= standard temperature, in degrees Rankine
= volume of liquid collected in impingers, in ml
= volume of gas sampled, in dry ACF
= volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
= stack gas velocity, in ft/sec.
= volume of water vapor at standard conditions, in SCF
= dry gas meter calibration factor
= percent isokinetic of sampling rate
Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions
Vm(std) = 17.64*Y*Vm*(Pbar+Delta H/13.6)/(460-Km)
41.472
Volume of water vapor at standard conditions
Vw(std) =0.04707*Vlc
1.765
A =
A(nz) =
Bws =
Cp =
Delta H =
Delta P =
Dia =
Md =
Mfd =
Ms =
P(std) =
Pbar =
Pg =
Ps =
Qaw =
Qsd =
Theta =
tm =
ts =
T(std) =
Vic =
Vm =
Vm(std) =
vs =
Vw(std) =
Y =
%I =
4,624
0.000638
4.08
0.8339
0.67
0.082
0.342
29.06
0.959
28.61
29.92
29.13
-0.12
29.12
36,992
21,704
90
71
380
528
37.5
41.664
41.472
19.20
1.765
1.027
106.9
E-3
-------
Percent moisture, by volume, measured in stack gas
Bws = 100*Vw(std)/(Vw(std)+Vm(std))
4.08
Dry mole fraction of stack gas
Mfd = l-(Bws/100)
0.959
Wet molecular weight of stack gas
Ms = (Md*Mfd) + (0.18*Bws)
28.61
Absolute stack gas pressure
Ps = Pbar+(Pg/13.6)
29.12
Average stack gas velocity
vs = 85.49*Cp*SQRT((Delta p*(460+ts)/(Ps*ms))
20.50
Volumetric flowrate at standard conditions
Qsd = 60/144*Mfd*vs*A*(Tstd/(ts+460))*(Ps/Pstd)
21,704
Wet volumetric Flowrate at stack gas conditions
Qaw = 60/144* vs* A
36,992
Percent isokinetic of sampling rate
%I = Pstd/Tsdt*100/60*((ts+460*Vm(std))/(Ps*vs*Mfd*Theta*A(nz))
106.9
E-4
-------
PM/PM-10 EMISSIONS-filterable PM-1Q, Run 1, kiln stack
Mn(pmlO) = 0.0033 = mass collected, in grams
Vm(std) = 41.472 = volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
Cs(pmlO) = 0.0012 = particulate concentration, in grains/DSCF
Qsd = 21,704 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(pmlO) = 0.23 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(pmlO) = 0.066 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
PM-10 concentration
Cs(pmlO) = 15.432*Mn/Vm(std)
0.0012
Emission rate
E(pmlO) = 60/7000*Qsd*Cs(pmlO)
0.23
Emission factor
EF(pmlO) = E(pmlO)/P
0.066
E-5
-------
METAL EMISSIONS-chromium, Run 1, kiln stack
M(fh-cr) = 35.8 = mass collected in front half of sampling train, in ug
M(bh-cr) = 405 = mass collected in back half of sampling train, in ug
M(fhb-cr) = 4.4 = mass collected in front half blank, in ug
M(bhb-cr) = 0.589 = mass collected in back half blank, in ug
M(t-cr) = 435.8 = blank corrected mass collected, in ug
Vm(std) = 99.211 = volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
Cs(cr) = 6.78E-05 = metal concentration, in grains/DSCF
Qsd = 20,713 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(cr) = 0.012 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(cr) = 0.0035 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
Blank-corrected mass
M(t-cr) = (M(fh-cr) - M(fhb-cr)) + (M(bh-cr) - M(bhb-cr))
435.8
Metal concentration
Cs(cr) = (15.432/l,000,000)*M(t-cr)/Vm(std)
= 6.78E-05
Emission rate
E(cr) = 60/7000*Qsd*Cs
0.012
Emission factor
EF(cr) =E(cr)/P
0.0035
E-6
-------
SPECIATED VOC EMISSIONS-toluene, Run 1, kiln stack ==__=
M(fh-tol) = 102.81 = mass collected in front half of sampling train, in ng
M(bh-tol) = 2.777 = mass collected in back half of sampling train, in ng
M(fhb-tol) = 0 = mass collected in front half blank, in ng
M(bhb-tol) = 2.145 = mass collected in back half blank, in ng
M(t-tol) = 103.44 = blank corrected mass collected, in ng
Vm(std) = 0.7050 = volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
Cs(tol) = 2.26E-06 = analyte concentration, in grains/DSCF
Qsd = 21,711 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(tol) = 0.00042 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(tol) = 0.00012 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
Blank-corrected mass
M(t-tol) = (M(fh-tol) - M(fhb-tol)) + (M(bh-tol) - M(bhb-tol))
103.44
Analyte concentration
Cs(tol) = (15.432/1.0 E-9)*M(t-tol)/Vm(std)
= 2.26E-06
Emission rate
E(tol) = 60/7000*Qsd*Cs
= 0.00042
Emission factor
EF(cr) = E(tol)/P
= 0.00012
E-7
-------
SEMWOLAIWE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS-phenol, Run 1, kiln stack
M(phenol) = 13 = mass collected, in ug
Vm(std) = 102.084 = volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
Cs(phenol) = 1.97E-06 = analyte concentration, in grains/DSCF
Qsd = 20,635 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(phenol) = 0.00035 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(phenol) = 0.00010 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
Analyte concentration
Cs(phenol) = (15.432/l,000,000)*M(phenol)/Vm(std)
= 1.97E-06
Emission rate
E(phenol) = 60/7000*Qsd*Cs(phenol)
= 0.00035
Emission factor
EF(phenol) = E(phenol)/P
= 0.00010
E-8
-------
INORGANIC GAS EMISSIONS-NOx, Run 1, kiln stack
MW(nox) = 46 = molecular weight of NOx
Q(nox) = 15.8 = analyte concentration, in PPM
Qsd = 21,711 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(nox) = 2.5 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(nox) = 0.71 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
Emission rate
E(nox) = (60/l,000,000)*(l/385)*MW(nox)*Qsd*Cs(nox)
2.5
Emission factor
EF(nox) = E(nox)/P
0.71
E-9
-------
HF, HC1, C12 EMISSIONS-hydrogen fluoride, Run 1, kiln stack ^^
M(bf) = 31,969 = mass collected, in ug
Vm(std) = 82.567 = volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions, in SCF
Cs(hf) = 0.00598 = analyte concentration, in grains/DSCF
Qsd = 20,307 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
E(hf) = 1.0 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(hf) = 0.30 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
Analyte concentration
Cs(hf) = (15.432/l,000,000)*M(hf)/Vm(std)
= 0.00598
Emission rate
E(hf) = 60/7000*Qsd*Cs(hf)
1.0
Emission factor
EF(hf) =E(hf)/P
0.30
E-10
-------
DRYER EMISSIONS-TOC, Run 2, dryer stack
MW(toc) = 16 = molecular weight of TOC
Qsd = 42,487 = volumetric stack flow, in DSCFM.
Bws = 4.2 = percent moisture, by volume, measured in stack gas
Cs(toc-pw) = 85.6 = TOC concentration as propane on wet basis, in PPM
Cs(toc-pd) = 89.4 = TOC concentration as propane on dry basis, in PPM
Cs(toc-md) = 268.1 = TOC concentration as methane on dry basis, in PPM
E(toc) = 28 = emission rate, in Ib/hr
P = 3.48 = production rate, in ton/hr
EF(toc) = 8.2 = emission factor, in Ib/ton
TOC concentration as propane on dry basis
Cs(toc-pd) = Cs(toc-pw)/(l-Bws/100)
89.4
TOC concentration as methane on dry basis
Cs(toc-md) = 3*Cs(toc-pd)
268.1
Emission rate
E(toc) = (60/l,000,000)*(l/385)*MW(toc)*Qsd*Cs(toc)
28
Emission factor
EF(toc) = E(toc)/P
8.2
E-11
-------
APPENDIX F.
* RESULTS OF RETEST OF DRYER EMISSIONS
Following the emission test conducted by MRI, Belden determined that one of the
dryer burners had been malfunctioning during the test. After the burner was repaired, the
dryer was retested by CSA Company, which was contracted by Belden to perform the retest.
This Appendix consists of the report of that retest of the dryer; the report of the retest is
included here at the request of the work assignment manager.
!-F -001
-------
-F 002
-------
Air Pollution Source Testing Phone-216- 525-511
CSA COMPANY
Custom Stack Analysis
24385 Center Road
P.O. Box 3750
Alliance, Ohio 44601
March 7, 1995
Mr. John Jensen
Belden Brick, inc.
Sugarcreek, Oh
Dear John,
This is a follow-up of the tests performed on November 11,
1994 for VOC and CO testing of your Plant 6, No. 3 drier stack.
In November the VOC and CO emissions were high. It was found to
be a problem with the auxiliary burner. The burner was repaired
and the tests were performed again on March 7, 1995. The emissions
now show 0.474 pounds per hour of VOC as Carbon and 1.52 pounds
per hour of CO.
The ra» data and calculations are enclosed.
Sicerely,
Ernest L. Kolm
!-F 003
-------
Filename: THE BELDEN BRICK COMPANY 3/31/95
P6RETEST.DRY SUGARCREEK, OHIO PAGE 10
PLANT 6 DRYER RETEST
PROCESS WEIGHT:
NUM LBS KILN PROCESS PROCESS
BRICK PER WET SCHED WEIGHT WEIGHT
PER CAR BRICK CAR/DAY (LBS/HR) (TON/HR)
3472 5.5726 12 9674 4.84
EMISSIONS FROM RETESTS:
LBS PER
POLUTANT HOUR
VOC 0.474 as carbon
CO 1.52
EMISSION FACTOR:
LBS PER
POLUTANT TON
VOC 0.31
004
-------
FOR
METHOD 25A CALCULATIONS FOR THC AS CARBON
DATE 37?/9f
Cc = ORGANIC CONCENTRATION AS CARBON, PPMV
cmeas = ORGANIC CONCENTRATION AS MEASURED, PPMV
K = CARBON EQUIVALENT CORRECTION FACTOR
K = 2 FOR ETHANE, K = 3 FOR PROPANE, K = 4 FOR BUTANE
MC =
Dc 10-6
Mc = MASS FLOW RATE AS CARBON, LB/HR
Qs = GAS FLOW, DRY STD FT3/HR FROM GAS FLOW MEASUREMENT
DC = 0.0312 LB/FT3 AT 68 °F
10~6 = DECIMAL PERCENT VOLUME CONVERSION FROM PPMV
FUEL GAS ^o "2 ff^_ /to % fa
CAL GAS lo/.oo r P~i
RANGE o-
AUTOMATIC CAL TIME & o MINUTES (T.E.I. MODEL 51)
HEATED SAMPLE LINE TEMP 3» 5 o Op
fa $• 5 u /*-> tf O ~2. oo& f ooo £)-SCPH AS
Co
T.5^
Mn
D.MI1^
!-F 005
-------
CSA CO.
CARBON MONOXIDE DATA SHEET-CFR METHOD 10
PLANT
LOCATION
C, /V°. 3 £>/!«.-
DATE
BAG
STACK
NDIR UNIT T.E MOD. 4 8
RECORDER
RANGE -
FLOW l< t
SPAN GAS VALUES, CO IN' N2 1 )
2) 99.
3) /50
4)3/1
ZERO SPAN 1
SPAN 2
SPAN 3
INITIAL CALIBRATION
FINAL CALIBRATION
TRIAL 1
o
6
"i / c,
.3 /5
TRIAL 2
TRIAL 3
TEST 1
TEST 2
TEST 3
Jtf.q 5
- -
CO7 (CO CORRECTED TO 7% 02)= CO (ACTUAL) X (20.9 - 7)/(20.9 - 02)
TEST 1, X 13.9 /20.9 - = ' PPM @ 7% 02
TEST 2, X 13.9 /20.9 - =
TEST 3, X 13.9 /20.9 - =
TEST 4, X 13.6 /20.9 - =
CARBON MONOXIDE MASS CONCENTRATION CALCULATION
COL =Qs X %V X DCO
COL = POUNDS PER HOUR CARBON MONOXIDE
Qs = GAS FLOW,F3/HR (FROM M-5 TEST)
%V = DECIMAL PERCENTAGE OF CO (V/V)
Dco = DENSITY OF CO,LB/F3 = 0.0724
TEST
TEST
TEST
TEST
1 ~L 0 0 o
' i
2
3
4
, dt> 0 x /£
X
X
X
>,
-------
. 4
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 J0:0«
HIGH - .8 JO::04
LOU * .2 10:06
AVG. • .5
•• SAMPLE REPORT •«
03/07/95 (0:0«
HIGH • .9 10:06
LOU • .2 10:06
AVG. • .6
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 JO:JO
HIGH « .7 J0:0»
LOW • .2 JO:JO
Al/G. - .5 3.}
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 JO:(2
HIGH « .4 JO:10
LOU •- .6 10:11
AVG. •- .1 ^te\
" SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 (0:14
HIGH - .( 10:13
LOW •- .7 (0:14 f
AVG. •- .3 *•'
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:16
HIGH «- .J (0:16
LOU •- 1.2 10:15 1.
Al/G. •- .7
•• SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 JO:J«
HIGH • I.0 10:17
LOW - .0 10:16 3.5
Al/G. - .7
" SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:20
HIGH - - .6 10:It
LOU • .110:19 -J.O
AVG. • .2
" SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 (0:23
HIGH - .4 JO:21
LOW •- J.5 10:23 2-'*-
Al/G. -- .6
" SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 (0:25
HIGH •- .6 JO.-25
LOW -- (.4 10:23
AVG. -- 1.0 I'*
" SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:27
HIGH •- .7 10:25
LOW •- J.9 10:25
AVG. «- J.4 I. I
•* SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 JO.-29
HIGH •- 1.4 10:2t
LOU •- 2.1 10:29
Al/G. «- J.7 I.I
•* SAMPLE REPORT **
03/07/95 JO.-3J
HIGH «- J.J 10:31
LOW •- 2.3 10:29
AVG. -- (.7 |.|
" SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:33
HIGH •- .7 JO:32
LOW «- J.J 10:3J . Q
Al/G. •- .9 ^
2-.*
G.5
,\
o.s
" SAMPLE REPORT
03/07/95 J0:35
HIGH •- .6 10:35
LOU •- I.I 10:34
AVG. •- .«
T..O
•' SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 10:37
HIGH •- .6 10:35
LOU '-1.2 10:37 . a
AVG. •- 1.0 '"
•' SAMPLE
03/07/95
REPORT
(0:39
-F
-------
F
HIGH •- .4 10:41
LOU •- .1 10:40
AVG. •- .7 *•'
•* SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:44
HIGH •- .4 10:42
LOU .- 1.0 10:44
AVG. •- .7 ^,l
•• SAMPLE
03101 Hi
REPORT *•
10:46
HIGH -- .* 10:44
LOU •- 1.6 10:46
AVG. •- 1.2 |,(.
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:41
HIGH •- .6 10:41
LOU •- 1.7 10:46
AVG. •- I.I 1,1
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/93 10:50
HIGH •- . .5 10:41
LOU •- .t 10:49
AVG. •- .6 1.1
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:52
HIGH •- .1 10:51
LOU •- .7 10:52
AVG. •- .4 1.4
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 10:54
HIGH •- .3 10:53
LOU •- .9 10:52
AVG. •- .7 7,1
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03101/95 10:56
HIGH •- .6 10:56
LOU •- 1.0 10:54
AVG. •- .1 l.O
•• SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 10:51
HIGH •- .4 10:57
LOU •- 1.2 10:51
AVG. •- .7 X.I
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 11:01
HIGH •- .1 11:00
LOU •- I.I 10:59
AVG. •- .9 \.e<
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/15 11:03
HIGH •- .6 11:01
LOU •- 1.2 11:02
AVG. •- .9 l.
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 11:05
HIGH •- 1.2 11:03
LOU •- 1.6 11:03
AVG. •- 1.4 !•"<
•• SAMPLE REPORT "
03/07/95 11:07
HIGH •- 1.2 II:06
LOU — 1.9 M:07
AVG. •- 1.5 K"V
•• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 11:09
HIGH •- 1.3 (I:09
LOU •- 1.7 M:07
AVG. •- 1.5 I.J
*• SAMPLE REPORT ••
03/07/95 11:11
HIGH •- I.5 II:09
LOU •- 2.0 11:10
AVG. •- I.I |,0
•" ZERO CHECK *•*
03/07/95 11:12
03/07/95 11:12
•• ZERO ADJUST '
03/07/95 11:14
•" MANUAL
Z.HV --I6.0
2ERO •- I.S
\.°\
*
-------
BELDEN BRICK, SUGARCREEK, PLANT 6, KILN 3 DRIER, NOVEMBER 17,1994
CONTENTS
BRIEF OF TESTS 1
RESULTS 1
DISCUSSION 1
TEST APPARATUS AND PROCEDURES, METHODS 1-4 2
TEST APPARATUS AND PROCEDURES, METHOD 10 3
TEST APPARATUS AND PROCEDURES, METHOD 25 4
COMPILED DATA TABLE 1 5
COMPILED DATA TABLE 2 6
LOCATION OF SAMPLE PORTS (FIGURE 1A) 7
LOCATION OF SAMPLE POINTS (FIGURE 1B) 8
SCHEMATIC OF -INTEGRATED SAMPLER (FIGURE 2) 9
SAMPLING APPARATUS FOR GAS FLOW MEASUREMENT 1 0
SCHEMATIC OF METHOD 10 (CARBON MONIXIDE) 11
SCHEMATIC OF METHOD 25A SAMPLE TRAIN 12
APPENDIX I
COMPUTER NOMENCLATURE 1 3
CALCULATION FORMULA 14
TEST 1 RAW"DATA AND CALCULATIONS 15-16
TEST 2 " " " " 17-18
CARBON MONOXIDE DATA AND CALCULATIONS 1 9
VOC DATA AND CALCULATIONS . 20
CSA CO., PO BOX 3750, ALLIANCE, OH 44601 PH (216)525-5119
FAX (216)525-7908
•-F 009
-------
SOURCE EMISSION. TEST
AT
BELDEN BRICK, INC.
SUGARCREEK, OHIO
PLANT 6, KILN 3 DRIER
NOVEMBER 17, 1994
Brief of Tests
Tests were performed to determine the carbon monoxide (CO)
and total volatile organic (VOC) emissions from the plant 6, kiln
3 drier stack to verify previous data obtained by others. The test-
ing developed into an impromtu mini test program to find the cause
of the emissions that were present.
The drier is used to evaporate the moisture from the brick
before charging it into the kiln. It is heated by removing the hot
air from the cooling section of the kiln and transporting it via.
fan and duct to the product discharge end of the drier. Additional
heat is added with a natural gas burner located on top of the drier
at the product discharge end. The hot air and flue gas pass over
the product and discharges through a vane/axial fan to the stack at
the product charging end of the kiln. The samples were extracted
from the stack below the roof line and the gas flow was measured
from sample ports above the roof line.
Results
See table 1 and 2.
Discussion
The testing was originally intended to verify data obtained
by others that showed the emissions from this drier to be much
higher than those at other sites. Since the data verified these
findings showing^^ppmv of CO and ^Hftppmv VOC as carbon, the
drier gas burner was turned off to see if it was the cause. The
results showed ^Jfcppmv of CO and 41^J ppmv of VOC as carbon. This
was a decrease of^J^percent CO and ^(^percent VOC.
A fifteen minute integrated sample was taken in the duct
from the kiln cooling section to the drier to determine if this
was the cause of the remaining emissions. It showed ^^PPMV of CO.
Since a very small quantity of fuel oil (diesel fuel) is used
as a mold release in forming the clay, the Tedlar bags from the
HB-F -010
-------
Method 3 test were tested for benzine,--ethylbenzene, toluene and
xylene. These are the standard tests performed for fuel oil con-
taminations. The results were below the detection limits of the
chromatograph.
The Tedlar bags were also tested for methane to check for
unburned natual gas. The results showed the highest concentration
with the drier burner in operation. There were smaller quantities
in the kiln cooling section air/gas to the drier.
The pitot traverse at the sample ports located above the roof-
line are the same sample ports used in prior tests. The velocity
profile showed a tangential component of 6-10 degrees at the outer
perimeter of the stack with the flow dropping off sharply (within
10 inches from the stack wall) to no flow with a negative flow near
the center. A judgement call was made in selecting the pitot traverse
points that may not reflect an accurate gas velocity and flow that
in turn would-cause erroneous mass emission rates. There are no
other ports higher up the stack. It may be difficult to obtain a
good velocity profile at any location in the stack since the gas
is moved by a vane/axial (propeller) type fan with an evase1 and
control damper located directly below the roof line. Also, the
velocity profile will change with movement of the butterfly control
damper. A location of two diameters down from the top of the stack
would be the most ideal place for the sample ports but this would
be difficult and costly to accomplish.
Test Apparatus and Procedures.
(A) Methods 1-4
During each of the two tests, a pitot traverse (Method 1 and 2)
was performed simultaneously with CO and VOC tests. The sampling
port locations are shown in figure 1A. The traverse point locations
are shown in figure 1B.
An integrated sample was withdrawn as per Method 3 to determine
the carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations required for the gas
density. The flue gas was sampled from a single point through a
stainless steel probe connected to a condenser by neoprene hose as
shown in figure 2. The condenser was connected to the sampling module
with a teflon hose. The module is designed with a three way valve
-F Oil
-------
to purge the system prior to injecting.it into a tedlar bag. This was
done at the inlet and stack during each of the VOC tests collecting
about two cubic feet of flue gas in each bag. The orsat analysis
were performed with the gas contained in the bag shortly after the
test was completed.
The Method 4 test was started at the same time as the CO and
VOC sample and ran for one hour. The sample train is shown in figure
3. The first and second impinger contained 100 ml of distilled water
and the third one was used as a dry trap. They were packed in ice
to condense the water vapor from the flue gas with any remaining
vapor collected in a Drierite column . The impingers and the Dri-
erite column were weighed prior to and after the test with the
weight difference showing the amount of condensate collected. This
data along with the flue gas temperature, flue gas composition
and meter temperature, pressure and volume were used to calculate
the percent moisture by volume.
The flue gas temperature was measured with a type K thermo-
couple connected to a digital temperature indicator.
Data from the above Methods 1-4 were used to calculate the
flue gas volumes at the inlet and stack of the incinerator. The
raw data and calculations are shown in Appendix I.
(B) Carbon Monoxide Test Methods
EPA Method 10 was used to measure the CO emission using a
Thermal Environmental Instruments Model 48 nondispersive infared
analyzer (NDIR). The NDIR was opperated as per manufactures oper-
ating instructions.
It was set up to show instantaneous readings recorded on a
strip chart recorder and from a one hour integrated sample collected
in the Tedlar bag used in Method 3 test. The results obtained from
the Tedlar bag were used to report data. The readings of the recorder
were used to observe changes during the test.
The instantaneous sample was obtained by withdrawing a sample
via stainless steel probe through Teflon tubing using a
vacuum/pressure pump discharging to a stainless steel dump tube as
shown in figure 4. The flow to the dump tube was held at a higher
rate than the internal pump of the analyzer to maintain atmospheric
_ c n -t o
-------
pressure required to operate the instrument.
All calibrating gases were EPA Protocol.
The Tedlar sample bags were taken to an outside laboratory
for analysis of methane, benzine, etylbenzene, toluene and xylene.
(C) VOC Test Methods
EPA Method 25A was used to determine the total volatile organic
compounds using a Thermal Environmental Instruments model 51H high
temperature flame ionization analyzer (FIA). The FIA was operated
as per manufacturers operating instructons.
The sample was withdrawn through a stainlesss steel probe and
heated sample line directly to the analyzer as shown in figure 5.
The analyzer output was connected to a serial dot matrix
printer. It was programed to print the VOC concentratin high, low
and average every five minutes. The five minute averages were used
to obtain an average for the one hour run. The analyzer automaticaly
calibrated af-ter each run. The results are shown in appendix I.
EPA Protocol gases were used for operating the flame detector
and calibrations. A mixture of fourty percent hydrogen and sixty
percent helium along with air was used for the fuel and propane
in nitrogen was used for the calibration gases.
Submitted by
?€-^^r-2~
Ernest L.Kolm
B-F 013
-------
TEST
DATE
TIME
EMISSIONS
1
11/17/94
10:50/11 :50
CO - PPMV MEASURED
CO - POUNDS/HOUR
VOC - PPMV(MEASURED PROPANE)
VOC - PPMV AS CARBON
VOC - POUNDS/HOUR AS CARBON
STACK, GAS CONDITIONS
TEMPERATURE - °F
STATIC PESSURE - IN.H20
C02 - %
02 - %
H2O - %
VELOCITY - FPS
STACK AREA -~F2
GAS FLOW - ACFM
GAS FLOW - (DSTP) CFH
11/17/94
13:13/14:13
103
-.5
2.1
18.1
2.40
39.07
17.7
41434
2225078
164
-.5
1 .8
18.3
2.55
39.73
17.7
421 91
2040602
SAMPLE TRAIN CONDITIONS
PITOT A P - IN. H20
ORIFICE A P - IN. H20
AVG. METER TEMP - °F
METER GAS VOLUME - DSCF
BAROMETER - IN. Hg
.440
2.0
85
44.09
29.14
.411
2.0
90
43.28
29.14
NOTE: TEST 1, DRIER GAS BURNER TURNED ON.
TEST 2, DRIER GAS BURNER TURNED OFF.
BELDEN BRICK, INC.
SUGARCREEK, OHIO
PLANT 6, KILN 3 DRIER
COMPILED DATA
TABLE 1
I-F 014
-------
AIR QUALITY SERVICES, INC.
4527 Clairton Boulevard
Pittsburgh, PA 15236
(412) 881-5630
TABLE I
RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS OF TEDLAR AIR BAGS
FOR HYDROGEN AND CARBON MONOXIDE CONTENT
CSA COMPANY
POST OFFICE BOX 3750
«ALLIANCE, OHIO 44601
SAMPLES COLLECTED BY CSA COMPANY
SAMPLES RECEIVED: NOVEMBER 18, 1994 9:50 AM
TEDLAR TEDLAR TEDLAR
PARAMETER BAG #206 BAG #207 BAG #213
o *>T
LABORATORY # 68022 68023 68024
CARBON MONOXIDE
(PPM)
METHANE (PPM)
BENZENE (PPM)
TOLUENE (PPM)
XYLENE (PPM)
ETHYL BENZENE
(P?M) •
TOTAL HYDROCARBON
EXPRESSED AS
METHANE (PPM)
THE SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY USING A FLAME
IONIZATION DETECTOR.
6 2-1 c c
I-F 015
JOB 4557
AIR QUALITY SERVICES, INC. REPORTED: NOVEMBER 21, 1994
-------
•f
I
CO T-
« CO
O Q
o< o
W
a,
s
CO
W
\
W
2:
H
O
o
K
O Q
fti O
W
s
CO
W
OS
W
2
OJ
«
CO
<
Q
*
H
2
H
O
•J
EH
O
Q
§
CM
K
W
H
Q
J
SAMPLE PORT LOCATION
FIGURE 1A
-------
Sample Points For Round Ducts
Diameter of duct in inches
Area = 17.72055
Radius = 28.5
Total No. Of Points = 15
( 1 )- 10.40673
( 2 )- 18.02498
( 3 )- 23.27015
= 57
SAMPLE POINT LOCATION
r A
-------
STAINLESS STEEL PROBE
NEOPRENE TUBING
ORSAT AND CO ANALIZER
^
ROTOMETEfc
2.3 CUBIC FOOT
TEDLAR BAG
THREE WAY YALYE
¥
FLOW CONTROL YALYE
BY-PASS YALVE
POLYFLOW
TUBING
PRESSURE-VACUUM PUMP
PURGE
?-F 018
INTEGRATED SAMPLER
-------
_£
-\
•4
I/
— .
~~ 1
*»
u
<
E"
CO
Q
O
ac
H
CO
w
f
L
C.
C
d
K
t
t-
c
C
3
X.
C
C
C.
f?1 J
ffl 1-
O C
o< t-
^«
0
1
5
3 CO
L) 1
H O
M
H •
3 Q
3 EH
S CO
^ 0^
q W
^ z
H M
S S
H M
ANT COLUMN
CJ
M
CO
W
Q
OMETER
S
PS
w
w
EH
VALVE
M GAGE
^ IS
u r>
W CJ
K <
CJ >
E CONTROL VALVE
CO
OS
o
CJ
CONTROL VALVE
M PUMP
2£
W 0
Z CJ
H <
OS
EH
W
s
CO
<
{D
2
Q
PQ
D
EH
W
U
H
U
O
OS
w
EH
W
s
0
2
S
TUBE
EH
O
EH
H
0.
OCOUPLE
AL TEMPERATURE INDICATOR
S EH
PS M
W (JJ
ac M
EH Q
CN
in
w
I
SAMPLING APPARATUS FOR GAS FLOW MEASUREMENT
-------
•ASCARITE II
SAMPLE
ZERO GAS
SPAN GAS
ATMOSPHERIC
DUMP VALVE
ROTOMETER
-XH
PRESSURE-VACUUM PUMP
NDIR CO ANALYZER
RECORDE
o
METHOD 10 - CARDON MONOXIDE ANALYSIS
-------
w
EH
2
H
Pi
O<
w
2
H
W
N
>t
W
METHOD 25A VOC ANALYZER
FIGURE 5
-------
APPENDIX I
I-F 022
-------
METHOD 2, 3 and 4
COMPUTER NOMENCLATURE
SYMBOL
VM, FT3
Pb, IN Hg
AH, IN H20
, IN Hg
oF
OF
IN.H20
IN H20
IN H2O
PMA
TM,
TS,
PG,
PSA,
CP,
AP,
%C02
%02
%CO
%N2
MD
VCL, ML
AS, FT2
9, MIN
VMSTP,FT3
VWSTP,FT3
BW%
MS
VS, FT/SEC
QA, FT3/SEC
QS,
DESCRIPTION
METER VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
ORIFICE DIFFERENTIAL
ABSOLUTE METER PRESSURE
METER TEMPERATURE
STACK TEMPERATURE
STACK STATIC PRESSURE
STACK ABSOLUTE PRESSURE
PITOT COEFFICIENT
AVERAGE SQUARE ROOT OF AP
CARBON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
CARBON MONOXIDE
NITROGEN
MOLECULAR WEIGHT DRY
VOLUME OF CONDENSATE
STACK AREA
TEST TIME
METER VOLUME @ STANDARD TEMP. & PRESS.
METER VOLUME @ STANDARD TEMP. & PRESS.
MOISTURE
MOLECULAR WEIGHT @ STACK CONDITIONS
STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK GAS VOLUME ACTUAL
STACK GAS VOLUME @ STD. TEMP. & PRESS.
UNITS
CUBIC FEET
INCHES MERCURY
INCHES WATER
INCHES MERCURY
DEGREES FARENHE
DEGREES FARENHE
INCHES WATER
INCHES MERCURY
DIMENSIONLESS
INCHES WATER
PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT
DIMENTIONLESS
MILLILITERS
SQUARE FEET
MINUTES
(DRY) CUBIC FEET
(WET) CUBIC FEET
PERCENT
DIMENSIONLESS
FEET/SECOND
ACFM
(DRY) CUBICFEET/HOUR
0°3
-------
METHOD 2, 3 & 4 CACULATIONS
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT Ib/lb mol
Md = .44(%C02) + .32(%O2) + .28(%N2 + %02).
DRY GAS VOLUME (Standard conditions) F3
VMSTP = (17.71 °R/in.Hg) (VM) ( ( Pb + (PM/1 3 . 6 ) ) / (TM +460)
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR (Standard conditions) FT3
VWSTP = (0.0474 FTJ/ML)(VLC)
MOISTURE CONTENT (Proportion by volume) %
BW% =.VMSTP/(VMSTP + VWSTP)
MOLECULAR WEIGHT @ STACK CONDITIONS (Wet basis) Ib/lb mol
MS = MD (1-BW) + 18(BW)
GAS VELOCITY ft/sec
VS = (85.48) (CP) { AP) ((TSA/(PSA)(MS))
GAS FLOW (Actual cubic feet /minute) ACFM
QA = (AS) (VS)
GAS FLOW (Dry standard cubic feet/hour)
QS = 3600 (1 - BW)(VS)(AS)((530/(TSA))((PSA)/(29.92))
Y = METER CALIBRATION FACTOR (Dimensionless)
I-F 024
-------
CSA CO. DATA SHEET (METHOD
I-V
TEST NO.
LOCATION
/ PLANT 1eLUf-*j /2/ltC(<
pt-i^i^-
r £ /
BAROMETER(PR) i_
£-L
s s
1
^?2>
<\S
<\t.o
q ft
"^
'AS
c\<\
c? 9
9UB
R
(Tm)
OUT
4?
'13
"*«
Ifc
1 1
">7
"?^
70
$9^
9.3,
"JJM
%t(
5*5
•?#.«-/
79
COND
TEMP
1%
MS
^/i1
H^
*^5~
HCa
<4^
4<2
so
^0
SO
s t>
3 o
****
INTEGRATED GAS SAMPLE 2/3
CO?
Op
CO
FILTER WT
GROSS
TARE F
NET
s /
PROBE WASH WT
4
_s* —
^
/^c ~*-° * n ~~' -^
FILTER
FILTER
HEATER
TEMP°F
/O/T.C5
//, 3
IliT.
»2, o
\0 « S
9A v0^
\3s,8
^-x, , (o
\q , 3
/K » O
IM.O
f T.T.
******
AVG
"ZiV
I2.J '
'
DATE (/n/9i
BYj^fr^-Crr
ASSUMED MOISTURE "Y" , <»^j/
NO. — HEATER NO. - NOZZLE DIA. —
STACK
TEMP
°F(TS)
lor
|'x_
/On.
I 0 i
V 0 *i
\.oi
\0 "S
\o^
\QI.{
10 H.
(OM
I o*b
'N7= 7*5f. ?
^"~
DRIERITE
STACK
PRESS.
(PS)
*~i J
'-(.S
~ -5
-, ^
-, $
- > S
-» S
-v S
- v S
-•s
-.s
~> s
-f?
"™ * J
VACUUM
"Hg
if
M
M
t-i
L-
M
H
U
H
H
M
^
^
•
MAX M,
CONDEN
FINAL
^52.^
IMPINGER xi S , u
HEAVY METALS WT-ipq
As
Be
03
\ ^
V
Cr \
Pb
Hg/
^
/
ORIFICE
"H20
'i-, O
Xl O
1,0
T.,b
7, *
3L.O
^^0
^vvO
^-vrt
5.v O
3UO
T,vO
SATE COLLECTE
|_ INITIAL
f^i O lJ O
Xo O
VEL
HEAC
(/»P)
i JJ"
/ Jo
.MS
• MQ
• HH
>M3
>MM
\41
(l *j
>M?-
•LI'X
^4 I
>H.>
LJ V.J
TIME
/OiJc3
J^
1 t',00
05"
/t>
15
1 O
2.J
•) 4)
7j-
LIO
VS"
Jo
/
-------
CSA CO. DATA SHEET (METHOD 29)
TEST NO.
LOCATION
BAROMETER
7_ PLANT I5<~*-.C
J^t.*
(PR) 5.
^7 £
*>i/M
/<( c
(j4-^ /i/a-ic/e DATE;///?/^
Q. s
<\(o
^"•v
c\)~-
SA
Gf
c\ "A
•\<\
\f\M
\QO
c^T
£ >L
' H
Cl5i3
R
(Tm)
OUT
gs
%X
^^_
^•x,
'^.^
KM
S^M
^i\
^C,
?.Cn
*?•/*>
\1
%^
ya
/?^.L
=1 D
INTEGRATED GAS
C09
o?
CO
FILTER WT
GROSS
TARE
K^
NET
SAMPLE
— FILTER NO. -— HEATER NO. — NOZZLE DIA. •
COND
TEMP
SO
So
sv
SA
s>-
t->?~
SH
SM
SH
St'o
c,C^
CJ9;
GO
o> /-
r-<'"' A
fe /l
****
T-O
PROBE WASH WT
P"-
FILTER
HEATER
TEMP°F
•H^CjO
H^T-
S.Ci
G^Ci
•3>,c\
l"i««l
S'~5>
•X">.Ci
^\
<-( -^
MA
-•
^
•-' i ~ ^
/ ^ S5
******
STACK
TEMP
°F(Ts)
I Oi>
\O(o
16 Co
\A -
\o >
\OV-
\Ci^-
103
\.o">
^ c, ?.
\(*'i
AVG N?= ->9, -
STACK
PRESS.
(PS)
-v 5
~.$
-, 5
o fc>
"^ i j
VACUUM
"Hg
4
^l
H
i.
M
t-l
H
H
<-{
L{
M
M
MAX M
ORIFICE
"H20
(AH)(Pm)
"2-..0
2 »O
?s«0
Ov'^
AvG
3uQ
i.O
^ xO
isvG
;\ ./s
^ 0
a.. ft
T-\O
CONDENSATE COLLECTE
FINAL INITIAL
/^•3 DRIERITE ^ ^/.<^ 'T-J^-M
L IMPINGER -ilt^.t, t«o
VEL
HEAC
» ^/
*H\
•u>\
.HO
HO
\M^-
-.•yi (
TIME
n ; / 3
:i
-------
DATA INPUT
Gas Conditions From Methods 1, 2, 3 & 4
Pb,In Hg
VM/ft3
AH,In H20
PG,In H20
Tm,F
Ts,F
CP
-v—AP,In H20
% C02
% 02
% N
VCL,M1
AS,ft2
RESULTS
Barometer f-
Meter Volume
Orifice Differential
Stack Static Pressure
Meter Temperture
Stack Temperture
Pitot Coefficient
Average Square Root Of Delta P
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Volume Of Condensate
Stack Area
-29.14
46.9
__ f\
-.5
-85
103
-.84
.6638
-2.1
18.1
-79.8
23
-17.7
Pma,In Hg
PSA,In Hg
MD
MS
VMSTP,ft3
VWSTP,ft3
BWO,%
VS,ft/Sec
QA,ASCFM
QS,ft3/HR
Absolute Meter Pressure
Absolute Stack Pressure
Molecular Weight Dry Gas
Molecular Weight § Stack Conditions
VM Standard Temp.S Press. Dry
VM Standard Temp.S Press. Wet
Moisture
Stack Velocity
Stack Gas Flow (Actual)
Stack Gas Flow (Dry STP)
29
29
29
28
44
1
2
39
29
10
06
79
09
08
40
07
41494
2225078
BELDEN BRICK
SUGARCREEK PLANT 6
KILN 3 DRIER STACK
11/17/94
TEST 1
!-F 027
-------
DATA INPUT
Gas Conditions From Methods 1, 2, 3 & 4
VM,ft3
AH, In
PG,In H20
Ts,F
AP,In H20
Barometer
Meter Volume
Orifice Differential
Stack Static Pressure
Meter Temperture
Stack Temperture
Pitot Coefficient
Average Square Root Of Delta P
Carbon Dioxide
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Volume Of Condensate
Stack Area
46.4
-2
0
-90
164
-.84
.6409
-1.8
18.3
-79.9
24.1
-17.7
RESULTS
Pma,In Hg
PSA,In Hg
MD
MS
VMSTP,ft3
VWSTP,ft3
BWO,%
VS,ft/Sec
QA/ASCFM
QS,ft3/HR
Absolute Meter Pressure
Absolute Stack Pressure
Molecular Weight Dry Gas
Molecular Weight § Stack Conditions
VM Standard Temp.& Press. Dry
VM Standard Temp.S Press. Wet
Moisture
Stack Velocity
Stack Gas Flow (Actual)
Stack Gas Flow (Dry STP)
29
29
29
28
43
1
2
39
29
14
02
74
28
13
.55
.73
42191
2040602
BELDEN BRICK
SUGARCREEK PLANT 6
KILN 3 DRIER STACK
11/17/94
TEST 2
I-F 028
-------
I
CSA co.:
CARBON MONOXIDE DATA SHEET-CFR METHOD 10
PLANT
/? c c /J ^
LOCATION
DATE
BAG
STACK
NDIR UNIT T.E MOD. 4 8
RECORDER
SPAN GAS VALUES,CO IN N2 1)_
RANGE o-S-id _FLOW
4)
2) / ?o, 6 3) 3'U
ZERO SPAN 1
SPAN 2
INITIAL CALIBRATION
FINAL CALIBRATION
SPAN 3
0
TRIAL 1
TRIAL 2
TRIAL 3
TEST 1
TEST 2
TEST 3
o/c
C07 (CO CORRECTED TO 7% 02)= CO (ACTUAL) X (20.9 - 7)/(20.9 - O2)
TEST 1, X 13.9 /20.9 - = ' PPM @ 7% O2
TEST 2, X 13.9 /20.9 - =
TEST 3, X 13.9 /20.9 - =
TEST 4, • X 13.6 /20.9 - =
CARBON MONOXIDE MASS CONCENTRATION CALCULATION
COL =Qs X %V X Dco
COL = POUNDS PER HOUR CARBON MONOXIDE
Qs = GAS FLOW,F3/HR (FROM M-5 TEST)
%V = DECIMAL PERCENTAGE OF CO (V/V)
Dco = DENSITY OF CO,LB/F3 = 0.0724
TEST 1
TEST 2
TEST 3
TEST 4
MO
X
X
X
X
x 1_0-6 x 0.0724 =
x 10~6 x 0.0724 =
10~6 x 0.0724 =
x 10~6 x 0.0724 =
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/HR
LB/HR
0
28
-------
FOR
METHOD 25A CALCULATIONS FOR THC AS CARBON
-,~ &*-•-< BY _r*'«'X.' ^T DATE
Cc = ORGANIC CONCENTRATION AS CARBON, PPMV
cmeas = ORGANIC CONCENTRATION AS MEASURED, PPMV
K = CARBON EQUIVALENT CORRECTION FACTOR
K = 2 FOR ETHANE, ^K = 3 FOR PROPANE, K = 4 FOR BUTANE
M
= Cc Qs Dc 10-6
Mc = MASS FLOW RATE AS CARBON, LB/HR
Qs = GAS FLOW, DRY STD FT3/HR FROM GAS FLOW MEASUREMENT
Dc = 0.03-12 JLB/FT3 AT 68 °F
10~6 = DECIMAL PERCENT VOLUME CONVERSION FROM PPMV
FUEL GAS
CAL GAS
RANGE c
AUTOMATIC CAL TIME
HEATED SAMPLE LINE TEMP
MINUTES (T.E.I. MODEL 51)
35o Op
!-F 030
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO
EPA- 454/R-01-010
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Emission Testing at a Structural Brick Manufacturing Plant:
Final Emission Test Report for Testing at Belden Brick Company
Plant 6, Sugarcreek, OH, November 8 to 12, 1993
5. REPORT DATE
November 2001
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Ron Myers (EPA)
Rick Marinshaw (MRI)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D2-0159 (WA 1-01 & 1101)
12 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Director
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16 ABSTRACT
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
is investigating brick manufacturing plants to identify and quantify filterable and condensible particulate matter
(PM), filterable and condensible PM less than 10 micrometers (PM-10), total organic compounds (TOC), volatile
and semi-volatile organic compounds, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, metals, nitrogen oxides (Nox), sulfur
dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide (CO2) In support of this investigation, the OAQPS
issued Midwest Research Agency (MRI) a series of work assignments to conduct emissions testing at a brick
manufacturing plant during normal production operations. The primary objective of the emissions testing was to
characterize the uncontrolled emissions of PM and PM-10 from the grinding/screening operations; TOC, methane
and ethane from the brick drying operation and all of the above pollutants from the brick firing kiln operation. Plant
No. 6 at the Belden brick manufacturing facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio with the capacity to produce approximately
225 tons per day of brick, was selected by EPA as the host facility. Plant No. 6 consists of two grinding/screening
lines, eight brick dryers and three gas fired tunnel kilns. In addition to the emissions testing, MRI monitored and
recorded process operations and collected process samples. ^^^^
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Brick Manufacturing, Air Pollutants, Particulate
Matter, Hazardous Air Pollutants, Nitrogen Oxides,
Sulfur Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, Volatile Organic
Compounds, Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons,
Metals, Hydrogen Fluoride, Hydrogen Chloride
Air Pollution control
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (Report)
Unclassified
21. NO OF PAGES
614
20. SECURITY CLASS (Page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
------- |