pcb so -16 ^"38 R-v^'^i [5^'op,^ _
&EPA Distribution of
Phytoplankton in
Wyoming Lakes
CNViROMVIENTA
PROTECTION
AGENCY
OAUAS, TEXAi
LIBRARY
\
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad categories
were established to facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to foster
technology transfer and maximum interface in related fields. The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy—Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9. Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans,plant and animal species, and
materials. Problems are assessed for their long-and short-term influences. Investiga-
tions include formations, transport, and pathway studies to determine the fate of
pollutants and their effects. This work provided the technical basis for setting standards
to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the aquatic, terrestrial, and
atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161
-------
EPA-600/3-79-122
November 1979
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN WYOMING LAKES
by
L. R. Williams, S. C. Hern, V. W. Lambou,
F. A. Morris*, M. K. Morris*, and W. D. Taylor
Water and Land Quality Branch
Monitoring Operations Division
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
*Department of Biological Sciences
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89114
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory-Las Vegas, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does
not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
Protection of the environment requires effective regulatory actions
which are based on sound technical and scientific information. This
information must include the quantitative description and linking of
pollutant sources, transport mechanisms, interactions, and resulting effects
on man and his environment. Because of the complexities involved, assessment
of specific pollutants in the environment requires a total systems approach
which transcends the media of air, water, and land. The Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas contributes to the formation and
enhancement of a sound monitoring data base for exposure assessment through
programs designed to:
• develop and optimize systems and strategies for monitoring
pollutants and their impact on the environment
•demonstrate new monitoring systems and technologies by
applying them to fulfill special monitoring needs of the
Agency's operating programs
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
14 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Wyoming, along with results from the calculation of several commonly used
biological indices of water quality and community structure. These data can
be used to biologically characterize the study lakes, and as baseline data
for future investigations. This report was written for use by Federal,
State, and local governmental agencies concerned with water quality analysis,
monitoring, and/or regulation. Private industry and individuals similarly
involved with the biological aspects of water quality will find the document
useful. For further information contact the Water and Land Quality Branch,
Monitoring Operations Division.
.^-' George B.'Morgan
Director
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas
n
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ............................... iii
Introduction ............................. 1
Materials and Methods ........................ 3
Lake and Site Selection ..................... 3
Sample Preparation ....................... 3
Examination ........................... 4
Quality Control ......................... 5
Results ............................... 6
Nygaard's Trophic State Indices ................. 6
Palmer's Organic Pollution Indices ............... 6
Species Diversity and Abundance Indices ............. 8
Species Occurrence and Abundance ................ 10
Literature Cited ........................... H
Appendix A. Phytoplankton Species list for the State
of Wyoming ........................ 12
Appendix B. Summary of Phytoplankton Data
-------
INTRODUCTION
The collection and analysis of phytoplankton data were included in the
National Eutrophication Survey in an effort to determine relationships between
algal characteristics and trophic status of individual lakes.
During spring, summer, and fall of 1975, the Survey sampled 156 lakes in
11 States. Over 450 algal species and varieties were identified and
enumerated from the 430 water samples examined.
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
14 lakes sampled in the State of Wyoming (Table 1). The Nygaard's Trophic
State (Nygaard 1949), Palmer's Organic Pollution (Palmer 1969), and species
diversity and abundance indices are also included.
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF WYOMING
STORET No.
Lake Name
County
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
Big Sandy Reservoir
Boulder Lake
Boysen Reservoir
Lake De Smet
Flaming Gorge Reservoir
Fremont Lake
Glendo Reservoir
Key Hole Reservoir
Ocean Lake
Seminoe Reservoir
Soda Lake
Viva Naughton Reservoir
Sublette, Sweetwater
Sublette
Fremont
Johnson
Sweetwater (Dassett
in Utah)
Sublette
Converse, Platt
Crook
Fremont
Carbon
Sublette
Lincoln
(Continued)
-------
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF WYOMING
STORET No. Lake Name County
5613 Woodruff Narrows Reservoir Uinta
5614 Rig Horn Lake Big Horn (Big Horn,
(Yellowtail Reservoir) Carbon in Mont.)
-------
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LAKE AND SITE SELECTION
Lakes and reservoirs included in the Survey were selected through
discussions with State water pollution agency personnel and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Regional Offices (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1975). Screening and selection strongly emphasized lakes with actual or
potential accelerated eutrophication problems. As a result, the selection was
1imited to lakes:
(1) impacted by one or more municipal sewage treatment plant outfalls
either directly into the lake or by discharge to an inlet tributary
within approximately 40 kilometers of the lake;
(2) 40 hectares or larger in size; and
(3) with a mean hydraulic retention time of at least 30 days.
Specific selection criteria were waived for some lakes of particular State
interest.
Sampling sites for a lake were selected based on available information on
lake morphometry, potential major sources of nutrient input, and on-site
judgment of the field limnologist (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1975).
Primary sampling sites were chosen to reflect the deepest portion of each
major basin in a test lake. Where many basins were present, selection was
guided by nutrient source information on hand. At each sampling site, a
depth-integrated phytoplankton sample was taken. Depth-integrated samples
were uniform mixtures of water from the surface to a depth of 15 feet
(4.6 meters) or from the surface to the lower limit of the photic zone
representing I percent of the incident light, whichever was greater. If the
depth at the sampling site was less than 15 feet (4.6 meters), the sample was
taken from just off the bottom to the surface. Normally, a lake was sampled
three times in 1 year, providing information on spring, summer, and fall
conditions.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
To preserve the sample 4 milliliters (ml) of Acid-Lugo!'s solution
(Prescott 1970) were added to each 130-ml sample from each site at the time of
collection. The samples were shipped to the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, where equal volumes from each site
-------
were mixed to form two 130-ml composite samples for a given lake. One
composite sample was put into storage and the other was used for the
examination.
Prior to examination, the composite samples were concentrated by the
settling method. Solids were allowed to settle for at least 24 hours prior to
siphoning off the supernate. The volume of the removed supernate and the
volume of the remaining concentrate were measured and concentrations
determined. A small (8-ml) library subsample of the concentrate was then
taken. The remaining concentrate was gently agitated to resuspend the
plankton and poured into a capped, graduated test tube. If a preliminary
examination of a sample indicated the need for a more concentrated sample, the
contents of the test tube were further concentrated by repeating the settling
method. Final concentrations varied from 15 to 40 times the original.
Permanent slides were prepared from concentrated samples after analysis
was complete. A ring of clear Karo® corn syrup with phenol (a few crystals of
phenol were added to each 100 ml of syrup) was placed on a glass slide. A
drop of superconcentrate from the bottom of the test tube was placed in the
ring. This solution was thoroughly mixed and topped with a coverglass. After
the syrup at the edges of the coverglass had hardened, the excess was scraped
away and the mount was sealed with clear fingernail polish. Permanent diatom
slides were prepared by drying sample material on a coverglass, heating in a
muffle furnace at 400° C for 45 minutes, and mounting in Hyrax®. Finally, the
mounts were sealed with clear fingernail polish.
Backup samples, library samples, permanent sample slides, and
Hyrax-mounted diatom slides are being stored and maintained at the
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas.
EXAMINATION
The phytoplankton samples were examined with the aid of binocular
compound microscopes. A preliminary examination was performed to precisely
identify and list all forms encountered. The length of this examination
varied depending on the complexity of the sample. An attempt was made to find
and identify all of the forms present in each sample. Often forms were
observed which could not be identified to species or to genus. Abbreviated
descriptions were used to keep a record of these forms (e.g., lunate cell,
blue-green filament, Navicula#l). Diatom slides were examined using a
standard light microscope. If greater resolution was essential to accurately
identify the diatoms, a phase-contrast microscope was used.
After the species list was compiled, phytoplankton were enumerated using
a Neubauer Counting Chamber with a 40X objective lens and a 10X ocular lens.
All forms within each field were counted. The count was continued until a
minimum of 100 fields had been viewed, or until the dominant form had been
observed a minimum of 100 times.
®Registered trademark
-------
QUALITY CONTROL
Project phycologists performed internal quality control intercomparisons
regularly on 7 percent of the species identification and counts. Although an
individual had primary responsibility for analyzing a sample, taxonomic
problems were discussed among the phycologists.
Additional quality control checks were performed on the Survey samples by
Dr. G. W. Prescott of the University of Montana at the rate of 5 percent.
Quality control checks were made on 75 percent of these samples to verify
species identifications while checks were made on the remaining 25 percent of
the samples to verify genus counts. Presently, the agreement between quality
control checks for species identification and genus enumerations is
satisfactory.
-------
RESULTS
A phytoplankton species list for the State is presented in Appendix A.
Appendix B summarizes all of the phytoplankton data collected from the State
by the Survey. The latter is organized by lake, and includes an alphabetical
phytoplankton species list with concentrations for individual species given by
sampling date. Results from the application of several indices are presented
(Nygaard's Trophic State, Palmer's Organic Pollution, and species diversity
and abundance). Each lake has been assigned a four-digit STORET number.
[STORET (STOrage and RETrieval) is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
computer system which processes and maintains water quality data.) The first
two digits of the STORET number identify the State; the last two digits
identify the lake.
NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES
Five indices devised by Nygaard (1949) were proposed under the assumption
that certain algal groups are indicative of levels of nutrient enrichment.
These indices were calculated in order to aid in determining the surveyed
lakes' trophic status. As a general rule, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, centric
diatoms, and members of the Chlorococcales are found in waters that are
eutrophic (rich in nutrients), while desmids and many pennate diatoms
generally cannot tolerate high nutrient levels and so are found in
oligotrophic waters (poor in nutrients).
In applying the indices to the Survey data, the number of taxa in each
major group was determined from the species list for each sample. The ratios
of these groups give numerical values which can be used as a biological index
of water richness. The five indices and the ranges of values established for
Danish lakes by Nygaard for each trophic state are presented in Table 2. The
appropriate symbol, (E) eutrophic and (0) oligotrophic, follows each
calculated value in the tables in Appendix B. A question mark (9) following a
calculated value in these tables was entered when that value was within the
range of both classifications.
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
Palmer (1969) analyzed reports from 165 authors and developed algal
pollution indices for use in rating water samples with high organic pollution.
Two lists of organic-pollution-tolerant forms were prepared, one containing
20 genera, the other, 20 species (Tables 3 and 4). Each form was assigned a
pollution index number ranging from 1 for moderately tolerant forms to 6 for
-------
TABLE 2. NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES ADAPTED FROM HUTCHINSON (1967)
Index
Calculation
01 igotrophlc Eutrophic
Myxophycean
Chlorophycean
Diatom
Euglenophyte
Compound
Myxophyceae
Desmideae
Chlorococcales
Desmideae
Centric Diatoms
Pennate Diatoms
Euglenopjiyta
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales +
0.0-0.4
0.0-0.7
0.0-0.3
0.0-0.2
0.0-1.0
0.1-3.0
0.2-9.0
0.0-1.75
0.0-1.0
1.2-25
Centric Diatoms + Euglenophyta
Desmideae
TABLE 3. ALGAL GENUS POLLUTION INDEX
(Palmer 1969)
TABLE 4. ALGAL SPECIES POLLUTION
INDEX (Palmer 1969)
Genus
Anacystis
Ankistrodesmus
ChlajTvydomonas
Chlorella
Closterium
Cyclotella
Euglena
Gomphonema
Lepocinclis
Melosira
Micractinium
Navicula
Nitzschia
Oscillator! a
Pandorina
Phacus
Phormidium
Scenedesmus
Stigeoc Ionium
Synedra
Pollution
Index
1
2
4
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
2
1
4
2
2
Species
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Arthrospjra jenneri
Chlorella vulgaris
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Euglena gracilis
Eugjena viridis
Gomphonema parvulum
Melosira varians
Navicula cryptocephala
Nitzschia acicularis
Nitzschia jDalea
Oscillatori a chlorina
Oscillatoria limosa
Oscillatoria princeps
Oscillatoria putrida
Oscillatoria tenuis
Pandorina morum
Scenedesmus C;uadricauda
Stigeoclonium tenue
Synedra ulna
Pollution
Index
3
2
2
2
1
6
1
2
1
1
5
2
4
1
1
4
3
4
3
3
-------
extremely tolerant forms. Palmer based the index numbers on occurrence
records and/or where emphasized by the authors as being especially tolerant of
organic pollution.
In analyzing a water sample, any of the 20 genera or species of algae
present in concentrations of 50 per milliliter or more are recorded. The
pollution index numbers of the algae present are totaled, providing a genus
score and a species score. Palmer determined that a score of 20 or more for
either index can be taken as evidence of high organic pollution, while a score
of 15 to 19 is taken as probable evidence of high organic pollution. Lower
figures suggest that the organic pollution of the sample is not high, that the
sample is not representative, or that some substance or factor interfering
with algal persistence is present and active.
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
"Information content" of biological samples is being used commonly by
biologists as a measure of diversity. Diversity in this connection means the
degree of uncertainty attached to the specific identity of any randomly
selected individual. The greater the number of taxa and the more equal their
proportions, the greater the uncertainty, and hence, the diversity (Pielou
1966). There are several methods of measuring diversity, e.g., the formulas
given by Brillouin (1962) and Shannon and Weaver (1963). The method which is
appropriate depends on the type of biological sample on hand.
Pielou (1966) classifies the types of biological samples and gives the
measure of diversity appropriate for each type. The Survey phytoplankton
samples are what she classifies as larger samples (collections in Pielou1s
terminology) from which random subsamples can be drawn. According to Pielou,
the average diversity per individual (H) for these types of samples can be
estimated from the Shannon-Wiener formula (Shannon and Weaver 1963):
S
H = -y P. log P.
^ i 3x i
where P is the proportion of the ith taxon in the sample, which is calculated
from n-j/N; n-j is the number of individuals per milliliter of the ith
taxon; N is the total number of individuals per ml; and S is the total number
of taxa. However, Basharin (1959) and Pielou (1966) have pointed out that H
calculated from the subsample is a biased estimator of the sample H, and if
this bias is to be accounted for, we must know the total number of taxa
present in the sample since the magnitude of this bias depends on it.
Pielou (1966) suggests that if the number of taxa in the subsample falls
only slightly short of the number in the larger sample, no appreciable error
will result in considering S, estimated from the subsample, as being equal to
the sample value. Even though considerable effort was made to find and
identify all taxa, the Survey samples undoubtedly contain a fair number of
rare phytoplankton taxa which were not encountered.
8
-------
In the Shannon-Wiener formula, an increase in the number of taxa and/or
an increase in the evenness of the distribution of individuals among taxa will
increase the average diversity per individual from its minimal value of zero.
Sager and Hasler (1969) found that the richness of taxa was of minor
importance in determination of average diversity per individual for
phytoplankton and they concluded that phytoplankton taxa in excess of the 10
to 15 most abundant ones have little effect on H. This was verified by our
own calculations. Our counts are in number per milliliter and since
logarithms to the base 2 were used in our calculations, H is expressed in
units of bits per individual. When individuals of a taxon were so rare that
they were not counted, a value of 1/130 per milliliter or 0.008 per milliliter
was used in the calculations since at least one individual of the taxon must
have been present in the collection.
A Survey sample for a given lake represents a composite of all
phytoplankton collected at different sampling sites on the lake during a given
sampling period. Since the number of samples (M) making up a composite is a
function of both the complexity of the lake sampled and its size, it should
affect the richness-of-taxa component of the diversity of our phytoplankton
collections. The maximum diversity (MaxH) (i.e., when the individuals are
distributed among the taxa as evenly as possible) was estimated from Iog2 S
(Pielou 1966), while the minimum diversity (MinH), was estimated from the
f ormul a:
MinH = .Izlioq 1- N - (S-U loq N - (S-1)
mnn N '°92 N N I092 N
given by Zand (1976). The total diversity (D) was calculated from HN (Pielou
1966). Also given in Appendix B are L (the mean number of individuals per
taxa per milliliter) and K (the number of individuals per milliliter of the
most abundant taxon in the sample).
The evenness component of diversity (J) was estimated from H/MaxH
(Pielou 1966). Relative evenness (RJ) was calculated from the formula:
D1 _ H-MinH
KU -
MaxH-MinH
given by Zand (1976). Zand suggests that RJ be used as a substitute for both
J and the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris (1968). As pointed
out by Zand, the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris does not
properly express what it is intended to show, i.e., the position of H in the
range between MaxH and MinH. RJ may range from 0 to 1; being 1 for the most
even samples and 0 for the least even samples.
Zand (1976) suggests that diversity indices be expressed in units of
"sits", i.e., in logarithms to base S (where S is the total number of taxa in
the sample) instead of in "bits", i.e., in logarithms to base 2. Zand points
out that the diversity index in sits per individual is a normalized number
ranging from 1 for the most evenly distributed samples to 0 for the least
evenly distributed samples. Also, it can be used to compare different
samples, independent of the number of taxa in each. The diversity in bits per
9
-------
individual should not be used in direct comparisons involving various samples
which have different numbers of taxa. Since MaxH equals log S, the expression
in sits is equal to logs S» or 1. Therefore diversity in sits per
individual is numerically equivalent to J, the evenness component for the
Shannon-Wiener formula.
SPECIES OCCURRENCE AND ABUNDANCE
The alphabetic phytoplankton species list for each lake, presented in
Appendix B, gives the concentrations of individual species by sampling date.
Concentrations are in cells, colonies, or filaments (CEL, COL, FIL) per
mill il Her. An "X" after a species name indicates that the species identified
in the preliminary examination was in such a low concentration that it did not
appear in the count. A blank space indicates that the organism was not found
in the sample collected on that date. Column S is used to designate the
examiner's subjective opinion of the five dominant taxa in a sample, based
upon relative size and concentration of the organism. The percent column (%C)
presents, by abundance, the percentage composition of each taxon.
10
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Basharin, 6. P. 1959. On a statistical estimate for the entropy of a
sequence of independent random variables, pp. 333-336. In: Theory of
Probability and Its Applications (translation of "Teoriya Veroyatnosei i
ee Premeneniya"). N. Artin (ed). 4. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and Information Theory (2nd ed.). Academic
Press, New York. 351 pp.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. II. Introduction to Lake
Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
1,115 pp.
Nygaard, G. 1949. Hydrobiological studies of some Danish ponds and lakes.
II. (K danske Vidensk. Selsk.) Biol. Sci. 7:293.
Palmer, C. M. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic
pollution. J. Phycol. 5:78-82.
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of
biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13:131-144.
Prescott, G. W. 1970. How to Know the Freshwater Algae. William C. Brown
Company, Dubuque. 348 pp.
Sager, P. E., and A. D. Hasler. 1969. Species diversity in lacustrine
phytoplankton. I. The components of the index of diversity
from Shannon's formula. Amer. Natur. 103(929):51-59.
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Commu-
nication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophication Survey
Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Corvallis Environmental
Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. 91 pp.
Wilhm, V. L., and T. C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water
quality criteria. Bio-Science. 18:477.
Zand, S. M. 1976. Indexes associated with information theory in water
quality. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 48(8):2026-2031.
11
-------
APPENDIX A
PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES LIST FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING
12
-------
Achnanthes
Andbaena flos-aquae
Anabaenopsis
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
V. acioularis
Aphanizcmenon flos-aquae
Aphanothece clathrata
Asterionella formosa
BotryocoGCus braunii
Caloneis amphisbaena
Campylodiscus
Carberia
Ceratium hirundinella
Ceratium hirundinella
f. robustum
Chiorogonium
Chrooeoceus l-irmet-icus
Closterium
CoGecneis ped-iGulus
CoGGcnei-s plaeentula
Coelastrum mierope/rum
Coelosphaerium naegel-ianum
Coelosphaenum pallidum
Cosmarium
Crucigenia quadrata
CruG-igen'ia tetrapedia
Cryptomonas erosa
Cryptomonas marssonii
Cryptamoans reflexa
Cryptamonas rostrata
Cyclobella
Cymatopleur>a solea
Cymbella lata
Cymbella minuta
Cymbella muelleri
f. ventricosa
Cymbella ventricosa
DaGtyloQoccopsis
Diatana tenue
V. elongation
Diatoma vulgare
Diatoma vulgare
v. linearis
Di.Gtyosphaerium pulGhellum
Vinobryon bavaricum
Dinobryon eylindr-icum
Dinobryon divergens
Elakatothria; gelatinosa
Elakatothrix viridis
Epithemia sorex
Eudorina elegans
Euglena
Eunotia
Frag it aria Gapucina
Fragilaria aapuci-na
V. mesolepta
Fragilaria Grotonensis
Fragilaria leptostauron
Glenodinium gymnodiniwn
Glenodinium gyrmodinium
V. biseutelliforme
Gamphonema olivaceum
Gomphonema truncation
Gompnospnaeria aponina
Gymnodiniwn ordinatum
Gyrosigma
Hannaea arcus
Hantzsehia
Lyngbya
Melosira distans
Melosira granulata
Melosira granulata
v. angustissima
Melosira italica
Melosira varians
Merismopedia minima
Microcystis aeruginosa
Microeystis incerta
Naviaula cuspidata
v. ambigua
Navicula rhynchocephala
V. gemainii
Navicula salinarum
V- intermedia
Navicula tripunctata
Nitzschia longissima
v- reversa
Nitzschia vermicularis
Oocystis pusilla
Osoillatoria
Pandorina morum
Paseherina tetras
Pediastrum boryanum
Pediastrum duplex
V. clathratum
Phacus caudatus
V. minor
Phomidiim mucicola
Pinnularia
Pleurosigma
Khizosolenia eriensis
Rhoicosphenia curvata
Rhopalodia gibba
13
-------
Scenedesmus balatonicus Staurastrum
Scenedesmus bicaudatus Stephanodiscus astraea
Soenedesmus bijuga V. minutula
Scenedesmus dimorphus Surirella angustata
Soendesmus quadricauda Surirella ooata
Ssendesmus quadricauda Surirella ooata
V. longispina V. pinnata
Schroederia judayi Synedra ulna
Schroederia setigera Tabellaria fenestrata
Skeletonema potamos Tetraedrcn caudatum
Sphaerocystis schroeteri Tetraedran minimum
Spirulina V. scrobiculatum
Tetrastrum staurogeniaeforme
14
-------
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF PHYTOPLANKTON DATA
This appendix was generated by computer. Because it was only possible to
use upper case letters in the printout, all scientific names are printed in
upper case and are not italicized.
The alphabetic phytoplankton lists include taxa without species names
(e.g., EUNOTIA, EUNOTIA #1, FLAGELLATE, FLAGELLATES, MICROCYSTIS INCERTA ?,
CHLOROPHYTAN COCCOID CELLED COLONY). When species determinations were not
possible, symbols or descriptive phrases were used to separate taxa for
enumeration purposes. Each name on a list, however, represents a unique
species different from any other name on the same list, unless otherwise
noted, for counting purposes.
Numbers were used to separate unidentified species of the same genus. A
generic name listed alone is also a unique species. A question mark (?) is
placed immediately after the portion of a name which was assigned with
uncertainty. Numbered, questioned, or otherwise designated taxa were
established on a lake-by-lake basis; therefore NAVICULA#2 from lake A cannot
be compared to NAVICULA #2 from lake B. Pluralized categories (e.g.,
FLAGELLATES, CENTRIC DIATOMS, SPP.) were used for counting purposes when taxa
could not be properly differentiated on the counting chamber.
15
-------
LAKE NAME! BIG SANDY PES.
6TORCT NUMBERI 560)
NYGA&RD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OB 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 D
0/0 0
0/0 7
0.17 7
01/0 E
02/0 E
01/0 T,
0/03 7
01/0 E
04/0 E
1.00 E
1.00 E
0/02 7
0/0 7
2.00 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER Or SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Oc liiOiVIOUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML, OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.50
10.00
2.00
3.32
0.09
1789.50
1193.00
0.45
0.44
119,30
568.00
1.53
7.00
2.00
2.81
0.07
1508,58
9B6.00
0.54
0.54
140.86
577.00
0.85
5.00
2.00
2.32
0.04
1087.15
1279.00
0.37
0.36
255.80
1050.00
16
-------
LAKB NANEt BIG SANDY
STORtT NUHBKBl 9«01
TAX*
APHAN17.0MENON FLOS-AOUAE
CKNTRIC DIATOM
CHROOHONAS ?
CLOSTERIUM
CRTPTOMONAE
CtMHELLA
CLENODINIim OKKNODINIUK
MICHOCJSTTR AERUGINOSA
NAVICULA
NAVICULA
NITE8CHIA
PASCHERINA TETRA8
SCHROEUERIA JUDAYI
RTEPHANODI8CU8
8URIRELLA ANCU8TATA
OVATA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
OB 19 ^S
09 02 79
10 IS 75
1 ALGAL | ALGAL
1 UNITS | UNITS
FORM IS %C PER ML IS *C PER ML
Fit 1 1 1 111*8.51 977
CEL 11147. XI Stl 1 ! 1
CRti 11141.91 912 13124.41 241
CEL 1 1 1 III
CEL 191 4.11 57 17117.21 ISO
CEL 1
CEL 1
COL 1
CEL 1
CEL 1
CEL (g
COL 1
CEL 1
CEL 1
CEL 1
?.)
X 1
|
1
X 1
X 1
IS 1
X 1
14
|
X 1
CEL 141 «. II 21 1
4.9
X
X
49
X
ALGAL
UNITS
S 1C PER ML
1
2
1
92.1
10.2
7.7
X
1090
X
1)1
99
1179
17
-------
LAKE; NAMF.I BOULDER
8TOP.ET NinjEERI 5602
NYGAARO TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 08 28 75 10 17 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
0/01 ?
01/0 E
2.00 E
9.00 E
0/05 ?
0.17 7
6.00 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 28 75 10 17 75
GENUS
SPECIES
04
00
01
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OF TAXA 6
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENME84 RJ
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAX* L
NUMBtR/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON K
08 28 75 10 17 75
0.56
5.00
3,00
2.12
0,01
2364,32
4222.00
0.24
0.24
844.40
3600.00
2.12
16.00
3.00
4.00
0.50
606.32
286.00
0.53
0,47
17.88
104,00
18
-------
LAKE NAME! BOVLDER LAKE
»TORET NUMBER! 8602
CClKTIKUtO
01 91 75
10 17 75
T«X»
ANABAENA
APHANOTHECE T
ASTERIONeiLA FORMOSA
CHLAMTDOMONAS T
CHROOPONAS ?
COSMUPJUH
CRUPTOMONAS
CRYPTOMONAS EROSA
DJNOBRfON BAVARICUM
GLAKATOTHRIX GSLAIIN08A
FRAQILAR1A CROTONENSIS
GIR09ICNA
MELORIRA ITALICA
SCENEDESMUS BIJU6A
SPNAERnCYSTIS HCHROETERI
STNEDRA ULNA
TABELLARIA rENESTRATA
THTAt,
OHM
rifc
CUL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL 1
UNITS |
8 %C PER ML 18 \C
1
2
1
4
90.1
7.7
1.4
0.7
1 1
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
X
12137. Jl 78
X 1 1
1IO« t t
X
327 |SI 9.11 26
1 1
59 1 1
X
141 9.11 26
1 1
X
11118.21 92
1 t
1 1
1 1
1 1
JO 11136.4
1 1
1 1
t I
X
X
X
X
104
X
X
X
4222
286
19
-------
LAKE NAMEl BOYSEN RES.
STORE! NUMBER! 5603
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 19 75 09 02 75 10 17 7«S
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
UIATOH
COMPOUND
01/0 V
03/0 E
0/04 ?
0.31 £
OB/O r
4.08 E
6,00 E
0/10 ?
0.14 ?
11.0 B
02/0 E
01/0 E
0/03 7
0/13 ?
03/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 19 75 09 02 75 10 17 75
GENUS
SPECIES
03
00
00
00
05
03
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 19 75 09 02 75 10 17 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNF.SS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML Of MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
XH
NH
0
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.72
23.00
4.00
4.52
0.05
10621.00
6175.00
0.38
0.36
266.48
2777.00
1.89
25.00
5.00
4.64
0.14
4191.54
2186.00
0.41
0.39
87.44
1129.00
2.45
19.00
S.OO
4.29
0,22
2266.23
925.00
0.58
0.56
48.68
350.00
20
-------
LAKE NAMEl BCIY8EN RES.
STORE! NUMBERl 5601
TAXA
ANABAENA
ANKI8TRODESMUS FALCATUB
V. ACICULARI6
APHANIZOMFNON FLOS-AQUAE
ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DIATUM
CHROOMDNAS 1
COCCONEIS PEDICULUS
CRYPTOMONAS
CRYPTOMONAB EROS*
CYMATOPLEURA SOLE*
CYHBELLA
CVKBELLA «1
CYMBELLA ACUT1USCULA T
CYMBELLA LATA
DIATOMA VULGARE
DIATOHA VULGARE
V. LINEARIS
DINnBRYON DIVERGENS
ELAKATOTHRIX VIRIDIS
EPITHEMIA 8UREX
FRAGILARIA CROTDNgNSIS
GLENODINIUM GYNNODINIUM
GOMPHONEHA ULIVACCDH
ROMPHONEMA TRUNCATUH
GYR1BIGHA ?
HANNAEA ARCUS
HANTISCHIA
MELOSIRA GRANULATA
HEL08IRA VARIAH8
MICROCY8TIR AERI'GINDSA
NAVICULA
NAVICULA It
NAVICULA 12
NAVICULA SPP.
NITE8CHIA
NITI8CHIA II
NITMSCHIA I]
NITZ8CHIA VEPMICULHRIS
DOCY8TI8
OSCILLATORIA
PANDORINA MOFUM
Pr.DlASTRUM DUPLEX
V. CLATHRATUM
PHDPM1PIUM KUCICOLA
SCFNtDrSHII! DIMORPHUB
SCENErFRHUS OUAORICAUDA
8CHROEDERIA 8ETISEPA
8PHAFRDCY8TI8 8CHROCTERI
8PIRULINA
STAUP.A8TRUM
STCPHANODI8CU8
8URIPELLA
SURIRELLA OVATA
BURIRELLA OVATA
V. PIKNATA
SYUfDRA ULNA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
05 19 75
09 02 7*
10 17 75
FORM
FIL
CEb
rn
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CGL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
FIL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
S tC PER ML
1
4
3
5
1
41.0
4.0
«.4
J.O
45.0
0.1
0.4
0.4
X
2529
J4«
397
134
X
X
X
2777
X
X
X
X
X
so
X
X
JS
X
25
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 tC PER ML
51 3.21 71
1
4
2
3
51. «
29. 0
9.7
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1
1129
X
635
212
X
X
47
X
23
X
X
23
23
X
23
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 4C PER ML
1
3
2
5
13.5
37.8
8.1
5.4
2.7
24.1
1.7
125
350
X
75
X
X
50
X
25
X
X
X
X
225
25
X
X
X
141 5.41 SO
4175
2186
9J5
21
-------
LAKE NAME! LAKE HE SMFT
BTORET NUMBERl 5604
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OS 23 75 OS 24 75 10 15 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUISLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0.50 E
1.50 E
0/04 7
0.75 E
3.50 E
4.00 E
1,00 E
0/05 7
1.00 E
7.00 E
03/0 E
03/0 E
0/06 7
0.50 E
07/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 23 75 OB 24 75 10 15 7S
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
02
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AMD ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
DIVERSITY
NUMBER OP TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOBITED
KAXIKUK DIVERSITY MAXK
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 23 75 08 24 75 10 15 75
K
8
M
XK
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1,63
19.00
2.00
«,25
0.04
11879.44
7288,1)0
0,38
C.38
3B3.-58
5053,00
2.74
15.00
2,00
3.91
0.03
15302.90
&58S.OO
0,70
0,70
372.33
1749.00
1,52
13.00
2.00
3,70
0.04
5734,96
3773,00
0.41
0.41
290.23
2338,00
22
-------
LAKE NAMM LAKE DE SHtT
STURET NUMBER I 5604
CONTIHUED
OS 99 7S
08 24 78
10 IS 7S
TAXA
ANA8AENA
AMKISTRODESHU8 FALCATU5
APHANIZOFENON rLOS-AOUAE
APHANOTHECF
A8TERIONELLA mKMOSA
CENTRIC DIATO*
CERATIUM HIRUNDINELLA
CHROOMONAS T
CLOSTERIUM
COCCONEI8 PLACENTULA
COEL08PHAEHIUM PALLItlUM
CO8HARIUM
CRYPTOMONA8 EROSA
CRYPTUMUNA8 HARSSONIt
CRYPTONONA8 REfLEXA
CRTPTOHUN«S R08TRATA
DIATOHA TENUE
V. ELOHGATUH
DICTTOSPHAERIUM PUbCHELLUM
FLASELLATC
rRACILAHIA CAPUCINA
FRAGILARIA CROTDNENSIS
GIMNODINIUM ORDINATUM
MEL08IRA CRANULATA
MICROCISTI8 INCIRtA
NAVICUIA
ODCY3TIS
PEDIA8TRUH BORTANUM
8CHROEOEPIA 8ETICERA
8PIIAERUCY3TIS SCHROETEni
STBPHAMODISCUa
STCPHAMODI3CJS ASTRAEA
V, MINUTULA
TOTAL
FORM
riL
CEL
TIL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
ALGAL 1 ALGAL
UNITS 1 UNITS
8 %C PER ML 18 %C PER ML
1
1
t
4
89.3
1.1
0.6
0.6
8.7
1.7
11.9
4.0
12113.11 673
XII 1
11114.41 807
XII 1
IS| 7.21 404
5052 1
X 1
83 1
X 1
X 1
14
X 1
41 1
41 1
X 1
414 1
X 1
134 |
870 |
290 |
|
X 1
13
|
I
X 1
1
1
t
1
1
3.6
2.4
1.2
15.7
31.1
12.1
CEL ISI 5.11 373 1 1
X
202
135
X
67
«7S
X
X
1749
673
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
SI 3.31 123
1 1
1162.01 2331
2
4
3
26.1
4.3
1.3
1.1
»I4
164
123
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
41
7211 "85 3773
23
-------
LAKE NAMCl FOAMING GORGE RES.
8TOPET NUMBER! 5605
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OS 15 75 08 07 75 09 22 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 fc
0/0 0
0/01 ?
0.10 ?
02/0 E
04/0 E
05/0 E
0/09 ?
0.40 E
11/0 E
05/0 E
05/0 E
0/10 ?
0.12 ?
11/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 15 75 08 07 75 09 22 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
03
03
05
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUnBKR Of TAXA
NUMBER Or SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL8/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF HOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 15 75 08 07 75 09 22 75
K
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.81
IS. 00
9.00
3.91
0.06
6000.15
3315.00
0.46
0.46
221.00
1981.00
2.59
22.00
8.00
4,46
0.08
9484.58
3662.00
0.58
0,58
166.45
1331.00
1.93
26.00
9.00
4.70
0.13
4788.33
2481.00
0.41
0.40
95.42
1086.00
24
-------
LAKE NJIHEl FLAMING GORGE RES.
STORE! NUMBERI S605
TAXA
ANABAENA
ANABAENOrslfl
ANKISTRODE8MUS FALCATUS
V. ACICULARI8
APHANIZUMCNON rLOS-AQUAE
APHANOTHECE
APHANOTHECE CLATHRATA
ASTERIDNELLA FORMOSA
CERATIUM HIRUNDIHELLA
CHROOCOCCU8 LIMNFTtCUS
CNPOOMOVAS I
COCCONEIB PLACENTUL*
CRYPTOMONA8 ER08A
CRYPTOMONAS MARSSON1I
CYCLOTELLA
CYMBELLA
DIATOMA TENUE
V. ELONGATUM
DIATOMA VUK5ARE
DINOBRYON DIVERGENS
EPITHEMIA 80REX
FRAGILARIA CAPUC1NA
», NESOLEPTA
FRAGIMRIA CKOTONENSH
GLENODINIUM
GLENODINIUM OYMNODINIUM
V. BISCUTCbLirORHE
OlMMODINIim
MEL081RA GRINUtlTA
NAVICULA
NITI8CMIA
NtTtSCHIA II
NITEBCHIA TERMICULARtS
OOO8TI8
OSCILLATORIA II
08CILLATOHIA 12
SCENEDE8MU8
8CENEDE8MU8 DIMORPKUS T
SCKROEDERIA 8ETIGERA
8PHAEPCCYSTI8 8CHROETERI
CONTINUED
05 15 75
0» 07 75
09 12 75
n
BURIPELLA OVATA
SlfNEDRA
SYNEDRA »
8YKEDPA ULNA
TETRAEDRON MINIMUM
V. BCROBICULATUM
TOTAL
FORM
FIL
FIL
CEL
TIL
COL
cut.
CEL
CKL
COL
PEL
cr.r.
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CBL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
cei
CEL
CEL
CEL
TIL
FJL
COL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEI,
CEL
CM,
CEL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
I 1C PER Mt,
J
3
4
1
1
1,»
7.«
9.1
14.3
1.'
99.»
X
339
X
J5D
X
X
301
474
X
43
X
X
i9m
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 1C PFR ML
|
1
1 2.6
113*. 0
1 1.3
j
1 1.3
1
1
5116. 3
1 ]. 6
31 9.1
I
1
1
1
I
|
|
I
1
I
2111.7
1
1
1
|
41 5.2
1
1
1
|
1
J
1 1.3
|
1
1 2.6
j
j
|
1
I
1
1
1
1
X
95
951
48
48
X
1331
95
333
X
X
421
X
X
190
X
48
X
95
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
1
4
3
2
5
43.8
18.7
6.2
27.1
4.2
X
X
1086
X
X
X
X
465
155
672
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
103
X
X
X
X
1315 366? 2411
25
-------
L*KE NAMF.I FREMONT LAKE
8TORET NUMBER! 5606
NYGIVARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 08 28 75 10 17 75
MYXOPHYCEAN 0/0 0 01/0 E
CHLOROPHYCEAN 0/0 0 0/0 0
EUGLKNOPHYTE 0/0 7 0/01 ?
DIATOM 1.50 E 0/02 ?
COMPOUND 03/0 E 01/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 28 75 10 17 75
GENUS
SPECIES
04
00
04
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 08 38 75 10 17 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSTTED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
.XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
0.56
8.00
3.00
3.00
0.03
2036.16
3636.00
0.19
0,18
454.50
3336.00
1.20
7.00
3.00
2.81
0.02
4996.80
4164.00
0.43
0,43
594.86
3181.00
26
-------
LAKE MMEl FREMONT LAKE
SSOS
TAXA
XPHANI^OMFNON «iOS-AOIIAE
ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA
CHl.AMYDOMONAS »
CHRUOMONAS 7
CHRYSOPHYTAN
CRIPIOHON»8 CROSS
CYCLOTELLA
DINOBRYnH CYLINDRICUM
MP.LOSIRA ITALIC*
P.HStOROLENIA ERIENSI8
TARCLLARIA rENESTRATA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
OS 3» IS
10 17 78
FORM
fit
CEL
CEL
r.r.i.
CF.L
CEt
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
1
1
18
1 I
121
ALGAL
UNITS
\r PUR MI, in »c
1
3. SI
111*1.71
| |
1 1
1 1
1 1
ISI
1 1
141
III
1
1
1
1
1.21
1
1.21
2.41
1
ALCAL
UNITS
PER ML
JC
121 12111.21 468
3J36 11176.41 3181
X ISI 2. II 94
131 6.7| 211
X
41
X
4)
1
I
1
1
1
X
86 141 3,4] 140
36)6
4164
27
-------
LAKE NAMEj GLENDO PCS.
STURET NUMBER! 5607
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 22 75 08 27 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
03/0 K
0/04 1
0.12 '?
05/0 5
01/0 E
04/0 E
0/05 ?
0.08 7
06/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 22 75 08 27 75
GENUS
SPECIES
03
00
03
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MUSI ABUNDANT TAXON
05 ?2 75 08 27 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.30
16.00
5.00
4.00
0.10
4048.00
1760.00
0.56
0.57
110.00
645.00
0.74
19.00
3.00
4.25
O.OB
2030.56
2744.00
0,17
0.16
144.42
2407.00
28
-------
LAKE NAMEl OLENOO OCR.
RTORET NUMBER I 5607
TAXA
ACHHANTHES
• WKISTROneSftUS
APHANIZOMENON CLOS-AQUAE
ASTERIONELbA FORMOSA
CALONEI5 AMPHISBAfNA
CHROOMONAS T
COCCOHEIS PLACCNTULA
CRYPTOMONAS HARSSUNII
CYMATUPLEURA SOLE*
CYNBELLA II
DACTYbOCOCCOPSIS
DIATOHA TENUE
V. CLONGATUM
DIATOMK VULGARE
rRAGILARI* CROTONrNSIS
FRAGILARIA LEPTOtTAURON
GbllNODINIUM ?
MELOSIRA ITALIC*
HAV1CUL* tt
NAVICUIA TRIPUNCTATA
NITtSCHIA VERMICl'LARia
•EDIA8TPUM RDRYANUM
RHDICOSPHCNI* CURVATA
3CENCDE8MUS
8CENCDESKUI (ICAUDATUS
(CENEDESMUS OIMORPHU8
KCEIIEOESMUS OUADRICAUDA
V. LUNUIBP1NA
SPHAEROCISTI* SCHpnrTFBT
STEPHANODI8CUS
8URTRELLA
8TNEDRA ULNA
TOTAL
CONTINUED
05 22 75
0« 27 75
FORM
CEb
CEL
rib
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEb
CEb
PEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEb
CEb
COL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
eni.
CEL
CEL
CEL
8
4
2
1
S
1
ALCAt
UNITS
%C PER ML
10.0 178
3,4 59
!«.« 29)
X
J.4 59
16.6 64!
X
X
X
1.4 59
X.
X
X
X
28,6 4K«
X
8
1
3
2
4
5
tc
87.7
1.7
7.0
1.7
1.7
ALGAL
UNITS
PFR ML
X
X
2407
X
X
X
X
T
48
X
X
X
191
X
X
41
48
X
X
1760
2744
29
-------
LAKE NAMEl KEY HOLE REP.
STORET NUKBERI 5603
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 73 75 08 7.9 75 10 15 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
1.00 E
4.00 E
0/05 ?
1.00 E
6.00 E
3.00 E
2.00 E
0/05 ?
01/0 E
6.00 E
03/0 E
05/0 E
0.12 ?
1.00 E
10/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 23 75 08 29 75 10 15 75
GENUS
SPECIES
02
03
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 23 75 09 29 75 10 15 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF TNDIVlDt'ALP/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MUST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
a
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.08
13.00
4.00
3.70
0.06
5237.44
2518.00
0.56
0.56
193.69
flSB.OO
2.15
9.00
4.00
3.17
0.08
2541.30
1182.00
0.68
0.67
131.33
452.00
2.06
13.00
4.00
3.70
0.05
6303.60
3060.00
0,56
0.56
235.38
1356.00
30
-------
[•ARC NAMEl KEY HOLE DCS.
STDRET NUMRERI 5601
TAXA
ANABAENA
ANKiaTRODE8MU8 FALCATUS
APHANI2OMENON rLOS-AOUAE
A8TERIONELLA FORM08A
BOTRTOCUCCUS BRAUNII
CHROOCOCCUS
CHROOMOMAS ?
CHROOMONAS T SPP.
CLOatERIl'M
COEIASTMJM MICKOPORUM
CDFLOSPHAICIUUM
COELOSPHACRIUM KAEGCLIANUH
CRUCIGENTA OUADRATA
CRVPTONOHAS
CRTCTOHONAC CROSA
CRYPTOHONA? HARS80NII
DICTYUSPHAEH1UM
RbENODINIUM
60HPH08PHAERIA APQNINA
OUCYSTI*
UOCT8TI8 PUSILLA
PHACU8 CAUDATUg
V. MINOR
SCENEDESMua OUADRICAUDA
6CHRDEDERIA 8ETICERA
STAURAtTRUH
STEPHANODI8CU8
TETRASTRUK
TOTAL
CONTIHUEO
as
7!
01 >* 75
10 IS 7S
OHM
riL
CEL
Pit.
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
cm,
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
ALCAL
UNITS
a »e PER ML
i
i
4
1
1
3.3) 83
1
14.11 858
2«.«
>.-'
31.9
i.l
1
X
X
719
X
8)
»92
21
X
X
CEL 111 2.21 55
COL II 1 X
ALGAL
UNITS
a *C PER ML
1
4
5
3
2
38.2
23.5
3.0
20.6
11.8
J.O
452
X
278
35
24]
139
35
X
ALCAL
UNIT8
ft tC PER ML
1
t
2
4
44.3
25.0
2.3
11.4
13.*
X
13SC
X
7*5
X
X
70
348
X
417
X
X
X 151 3.41 104
1 1 1
2518
1113
1060
31
-------
LAKE NAMEt OCEAN LAKE
STORE! NUMBERS 5609
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
04/0 E
0/05 ?
0/07 ?
05/0 E
4.00 E
5.00 E
0/09 ?
0/04 7
9.00 E
2.00 E
10.0 E
0/12 ?
0/04 T
12.0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 0-5 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
GENUS
6PECIC3
08
00
04
00
06
0}
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER UK INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 19 75 09 02 75 10 16 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
,7
RJ
L
K
2.50
16,00
1.00
4.00
0.10
4410.00
1764.00
0.63
0.*2
110.25
B54.00
2.00
18.00
1.00
4.17
0.13
3102.00
1551.00
0.48
0.47
86.17
609.00
2.43
23.00
1.00
4.52
0.05
16470.54
6778.00
0.54
0.54
294.70
1991.00
32
-------
LAKE NAMCl OCEAN LAKE
STORET NUMBER I 8«09
TAX*
ANABACNA
ANKISTRODE8KUS
ANK1STRODESHUS FALCATU8
APHANIZOMENON FLOS-AOUAE
ASTERIONFLLA FORMOSA
CHtORUCOm'N
CHLOROPIIYTAN FILAMENT
CHPOOKONA8 T
CLO8TERIUM
COCCONEI8 PLACENTULA
COEL08PHAERIUM
C06MARIUN
CRUCIGENIA TETRAPCDIA
CRYPTOMONA8 EROSA
CRYPTOMONAS MAR8SONII
CRYPTOMONAS RCFLEXA
CRYPTOMONA8 8PP.
CYMATOPLEURA 80LCA
CYMBELLA
CYMBELLA MUEI.LERI
V, VEKTRICOSA
DINOBRYON DIVCRGEN8
EPITHEMIA
FRAGILARIA CROTONEN8I8
GLENODINIUW GTMNODINIUM
V. BIBCUTELLlrORME
HERI8HDPBDIA MINIMA
NAVICULl »)
NAVICUL* 12
IIITK8CHI>
OOCT8TIS
OSCIILATORIX
PEOIA8TRUH BORYANUM
PtOIASTRUM DUPLEX
V. CLITHRATUM
PLRURO8IGMA
8CENEDE8MU8 (IJUCA
SCCNEOE8MUI QUADRICAUDA
8CHROEDERIA 8ETIGERA
TABELLARIA
TETRAEDRON CAUDATUH
TKTRAEDRON MIHlHUr
». 8CFOBICULATUM
TETRA8TRUM STAUROCENIAKFORME
TOTAL
CONTINUED
OS 19 IS
09 02 78
79
FORM
FIL
CCb
CEL
Fit
CEL
CEl
FIL
crL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CEL
COL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
FIL
COL
COL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEl
CCL
COL
ALGAL
UK-ITS
8 %C PER ML
5
1
1
4
J
«.«
1.*
46.7
(.9
4.4
4.4
2.2
«.7
11. J
X
X
78
X
1S7
124
X
X
X
X
197
7»
78
39
118
2)9
ALGAL
UNIT8
8 %C PER ML
91 1.9| 10
2
1
)
4
I
1.91 10
11.81 183
1.9
57.3
19.3
S.9
X
30
X
X
X
978
X
X
X
X
609
X
X
91
X
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
9
2
3
4
1
1
1
4.31 291
0.91 98
27.01 18)3
|
27.91 1891
18.01 1111
1 X
1
1 X
1
0.4| 29
I
1 X
1 X
18.91 1281
1 X
1
1
0.41 2«
0.4| 29
1
1 X
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 X
1
1 X
1
1 X
1
0.91 98
1
0.41 29
1
0.41 29
1
1 X
0.41 39
17M
1851
6778
33
-------
LAKE NAMEl SEMINOE RES.
STOHET NUMBERI 5610
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DAfE! 05 IS 75 08 27 75 10 16 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLORPPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/01 0
1.00 E
1.00 E
0.06 ?
3.00 E
02/0 E
0/0 0
0/02 ?
0/07 ?
02/0 E
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/02 7
0/01 ?
02/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
PATE 05 19 75 08 27 75 10 16 75
GENUS
SPECIES
03
03
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER Of TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDJVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 19 75 08 27 75 10 16 75
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
M
J
RJ
L
K
2.47
25.00
5.00
4.S4
0.37
1731.47
701.00
0.53
0.50
26.04
306.00
1.19
11.00
5.00
3.46
0.13
1042.44
876.00
0.34
0.32
79.64
676.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
2.00
0.03
1070.00
1070.00
0.50
0.50
267.50
558.00
34
-------
LAKE NAHEl SEMINOE RES.
STORET NUMRCRI 5610
COHTIKUtD
OS 19 75
01 37 75
10
75
ANABAENA
APHANIZOMENON FL08-ABUAE
ASTERIONELLA FORMOSA
CALONEIS AMPHISBAENA
CENTRIC DIATOM
CHROOMONAS ?
rOCCONEIS
COShARIUH
CRYPTOMONAS ER08A
CYMATOPIEURA 8QLE4
CYMBELLA
DI/ITOMA VULGARF
EPITHEMIA SOREX
eUCLENA
FRACILARIA CROTONEN8IS
GLENODINIUM
SOMPHOHr«A OLIVACEUH
GOMPHONEMA TRUNCATUM
GOMPHONEMA VENTRICOBUM T
GYRORIGMA
HAHNAEA ARCUS
N»VXCUL* It
NAVICULA «2
NAVICUIA 8ALINARUM
V, INTERMEDIA
KITZ8CHIA
HITI8CHIA VERMICULARIS
PENMATE DIATOM
PIHNIILAMIA
RHOIC08PHENIA CURVATA
8CENEDEBMU8 OUADRICAUDA
SPHAEROCY8TI8 BCHRnETFRI
8URIREM.A OVATA
SYNEDRA ULNA
TOTAL
ORM
FIL
FIL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
S »C PER ML
2
4
1
*
9.4
4J.7
6.)
15.5
1.1
9.4
J.I
X
66
)06
X
X
X
X
X
44
X
X
109
X
X
X
J2
X
X
X
66
X
X
22
X
CEL 111 9.41 66
ALGAL
UNITS
S %C PER ML
1 1 X
1177.21 676
41 2.91 25
1
2
5
1.6
8.6
2.9
1
1
75
75
X
25
X
X
X
X
ALGAL
UNITS
S %C PER ML
1 1
1147.91 S13
2
52.1
S5«
X
X
701
876
1070
35
-------
LAKE NAME! SODA LAKE
STCRET NUMBERl 5611
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE OB 28 75 10 20 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
02/0 E
02/0 E
0/04 7
0/05 7
04/0 E
0/0 0
01/0 E
0/01 ?
0/02 7
01/0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 28 75 10 20 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY H
NUMBER OP TAXA S
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED M
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY D
TOTAL NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/ML N
EVENNESS COMPONENT J
RELATIVE EVENNESS RJ
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAXA L
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXOH K
08 28 75 10 20 75
1.11
9.00
2.00
3.17
0.24
35H.53
323.00
0.35
0.30
35.89
221.00
1.58
3.00
2.00
1.58
0.13
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.32
0,00
0,01
36
-------
LAKE NAME! SODA LAKE
8TORET NUHBFRI 5SH
TAXA
APHANIZQCENPN FL08-»OU»r
CAMPYLODISCU5
COCCONEIS PEDICULU8
CYANOPHYTAN COCCOIO CELLED COLONY
CTMBELLA
DIATOMA VUL6ARE
ElAKATOTHRtX
rRAGILARIA
NAV1CULA
OOCTITI8
PEOIASTRUM BORYANUM
TOTAL
CONTINUrP
08 It 75
«0 20 7S
1 ALCAL
1 UNITS
FORM IS »C »ER hL
ru jji s.ti 17
CEL 1
CEL 1
COL 11
CEL 1
CEL 1
COL 12
CCL 1
CEL 1
en i
COL 1
61.4
J6.J
X
811
X
X
es
X
X
X
ALQAL
UNITS
S tC PER ML
X
X
X
12]
37
-------
LAKE NAME! VIVA NAUGHTON RES.
STORE! NUMBBRt 5612
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 06 06 75 09 18 75 10 16 79
HYXOPHYCEAM
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
02/0 E
01/0 E
0/03 ?
0/01 T
03/0 E
01/0 E
01/0 E
0/02 T
0/03 ?
02/0 E
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 T
01/0 E
02/0 E
PALMER 13 ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 08 06 75 09 18 75 10 16 78
GENUS
SPECIES
01
00
00
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TUXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MJUIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINK
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INOIV10UALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
C8 06 7? 09 18 75 10 16 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RO
L
K
1.06
e.oo
3.00
3.00
0.02
5676,30
5355.00
0.35
0.35
669.38
4430.00
0.08
5.00
3.00
2.32
0.01
329.12
4114.00
0.03
0.04
822.80
4073.00
0.81
5.00
3.00
2.32
0.02
2007.18
2478.00
0.35
0.35
495.60
2135.00
38
-------
LAKE NAMEt VIVA NAUflHTDN RES.
8TORET NUMBER! 5SI3
TAXA
APHANItOMENON FLOS-»OUAE
CERATIUM HIRUNDINELLA
f. R08USFUM
CHROONONAS T
CHYPTOMONtS II
CftYPTOMONAS EROSA
CRYPIUMONAS MARSSONII
CRYPTOMONAS REFLEX*
EUMQTIA
FIIAGILARIA CROTONENSIS
GOMPHONEHA
MICROCT6TIB INCERTA
NAVICUI/A
SCHROEDERIA SETICERA
STEPHANODIRCUB
TOTAL
corrmuco
0* OS 75
09 18 75
10 18 7S
FORM
1
1
18
%e
FIL 11112,71
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CCI.
CEL
CEL
1 1
141
1 1
1 1
111
1 1
121
1 1
1 1
1 1
ISI
1 1
1 1
1 1
0
S
2
3
4
0
I
.91
.SI
1
.71
|
.71
1
1
1
.51
1
.«!
1
ALGAL ALCAL
UNITS
PER ML
4430
49
292
146
146
X
243
UNITS
S tC PER ML
1199.01 4073
X
X
X
49 121 1.01 41
1 1 1
1
IS
I1II6
1 1
1 1
ISI «
121 4
1 1
141 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
131 1
\C
.21
1
1
.91
.21
1
.41
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.41
ALGAL
UNITS
PER ML
2I3S
172
103
34
14
S39S
4114
24TI
39
-------
LAKE KAMEl KOODP.UFF NARROW* RES.
8TORET NUMBER! 5619
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 16 75 09 07 75 09 18 75 10 16 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOKOPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
0/0 0
02/0 E
o.so e
0.20 ?
04/0 E
02/0 E
03/0 E
0.20 ?
01/0 E
07/0 E
03/0 E
03/0 E
0.17 1
2.00 E
09/0 E
1.00 E
1.50 E
0/05 ?
0.67 E
3.50 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 0? 16 75 08 07 75 09 18 75 10 16 75
GENUS
SPECIES
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 05 16 75 08 07 75 09 18 75 10 16 75
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INOIVIDUAL8/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
8
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
L
K
1.17
14.00
2.00
3.81
0.02
11879,01
10153,00
0.31
O.J1
725.21
7723.00
2.04
10.00
2.00
3.32
0.07
2955.96
1449.00
0.61
0.61
144.90
676.00
1.76
14.00
2.00
3.81
0.07
3954.73
2247.00
0,46
0.46
160.50
1103.00
2.04
16.00
2.00
4.00
0.29
1087.32
533.00
0.51
0.48
33.31
205.00
40
-------
LAKE NAI»E| WOODRUFF NARROWS PF,S.
8TORET MUMBERI 5613
TAXA
ANABAEMA
ANA4AKNA «1
ANA8AENA FLOS-AQUAE
ANKISTRODE8MU8 FALCATUS
APHANIZOMENON FLOS-AOUAE
ASTCRIONELLA FORMOSA
CENTRIC DIATOM
CERATIUM HIRUNDINELLA
CHRUOMOHAS T
CLOSTERIUH
COSMARIUM
CRYPTQMONAS
CRYPTOMONAS EROSA
CRYPTOMONAS NARSSONIl
CRTPTOMONAS REFLCXA
CYlltOPHTTAN COLONY
DIATOMA TENUE
V. CLONGATUM
CONTINUED
OS
0» 07 7B
09 II 75
10 16 75
EUCbENA
rbAGELLATE
FRAGILARIA CROTONEN8IS
GLENODINIUM KDAX ?
HANTZSCHIK
MELOSIRA CRAKULATA
MgLOSIPA ITAIICA
NERISHDPEDIA MINIMA
NAV1CULA
OOCY1TIS
PASCHERINA TETRA8
PEDIASTRUM BORIANUM
PEDIASTRUM DUPLEX
V. ClATHRATUM
SCCNEDCSMUS BALATONICUS
SCENEUtSMUS BIJUGA
SCENEDE8MU9 QUADRICAURA
8CHROEOERIA 8ETIGRRA
STEPHANUDISCUS
SURIREbLA
8YNEORA ULNA
TOTAL
FORM
riL
riL
FIL
CEL
riL
CEL
CEL
CKL
CKL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
CEL
CEL
ALGAL 1 ALGAL
UNITS 1 UNITS
8 tC PER ML IS %C PER ML
4
2
I
1
O.S
i.O
12.1
'.1
7«,J
111 6.71 97
)4
110
139«
216
X
X
77JJ
X
X
X
X
X
CEL ISI O.SI 14
CEL II 1 X
*
4
3
1
10,0
6.7
3.3
46.7
26.6
US
97
X
41
X
676
X
X
386
ALGAL
UNITS
8 %C PER ML
1 1
41 1.81 41
1149.11 1103
1 1
3114. (I 127
s
2
5.4
29.1
X
X
X
X
X
X
122
X
X
X
694
ALGAL
UNITS
S tC PER ML
1
4
I
9
2
31.9
7.7
IS, 4
7.7
30.9
X
209
41
X
X
X
• 2
X
X
X
X
X
41
164
X
X
10193
1449
933
41
-------
LAKE NAHEl YELLOWTAIL RES,
STORE! NUHBERI 5614
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 05 21 75 09 29 75 10 17 75
MYXOPHYCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EUGLENOPHYTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
01/0 E
0/0 0
0/01 ?
0.?5 ?
04/0 f.
3.00 E
3,00 E
0/06 ?
0.50 E
9.00 E
2.00 E
3.00 E
0.20 ?
0.33 E
10.0 E
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 05 21 75 08 29 75 10 17 75
GENUS
SPECIES
04
00
01
00
OB
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MINIMUM DIVERSITY MINH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBEP OF INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENNESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENNESS
MEAN NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER/ML OF MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
05 21 75 08 29 7S 10 17 75
H
S
M
XH
NH
D
N
J
RJ
b
K
3.09
17.00
7.00
4.09
0,13
4554.66
1474.00
0.76
0.75
86.71
357.00
1.97
31.00
7.00
4.39
0,09
5460.84
2772.00
0.45
0.44
132.00
1728.00
2,64
26.00
9.00
4.70
0.34
2190.64
826.00
0.56
0.53
31,77
363.00
42
-------
LAKE NAMEl YELLOHTAIL RES.
8TORET NUMBEKI 5614
TAXA
ANA8AENA
ANKISTKODE8MU8 FALCATUS
V. ACICULARIS
APIIANIZOKENON FLOS-AQUAF.
A8TCRIONELI/A FORMOSA
CARTERIA
CHLOROGONIUM
CHRUOMONAS T
CLOSTERIUM
COCCONEIS PEDICULUg
COEIiASTRUM MICROPURUM
CRYPTOHONAS
CRYPTOMONAS EROIA
CRYPTOMDNAS HABSSONII
CRYPTOMONAS REFLEX*
CYMBELLA MJNUTA
CYMftELLA VBNTRICOSA
CYST
DIATOM* VULGARE
DIHDBRYON DIVCRGENS
EPlrHBWIA 80RCX
CUSLENA
FRAGIbARIA CROTOHENSIS
SOHPHONEMA OLIVACCUM
LYHGBYA
MELO8IRA
KELO8IRA DISTANf
HELOSIRA ORANULATA
HELOBIPA GRANULATA
V. ANOUSTISBIHA
MEL08IPA ITALICA
MICROCY8TIS IHCERTA
NAVICULA
NAVICULA CUSPIDATA
T. AMBIGUA
NAVICUbA RHYNCHOCEPHAI.A
V. GIRMAINII
NAVICULA TRIPUNCTATA
DITZ8CHIA
NITZ8CHIA It
NITISCHIA |]
NITZ8CHIA riLlrORMIS T
NITKSCHIA LONGISSIMA
V. REVERSA
NITZ8CHIA VERHICULABIS
OOCY8TIS
OKCILLATORIA
RHUDOMONA8 T
RHOPALOU1A r.IBBA
8CENEUESMUS
BCHROEDCRIA 8ETIGERA
SKRliEIUNEMA POTAMOS
SPHArHOCYSTIS SCHR9EIERI
STAURA8TRUM
8TEPHANOOI8CU8
8YNEDRA
8YNCDRA ULH»
TOTAL
COHTIKUED
05 Jl 75
08 29 TS
10 17 75
FORM
riL
CEL
riL
CFI.
CEL
CEL
CEL
COL
CCL
COL
CEL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CCL
CCL
riL
CCL
CCL
CEL
CCL
CEL
COL
CCL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
FIL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
COL
CEL
CEL
CCL
CEL
ALGAL
UNITS
8 »C PER ML
2
3
1
S
4
19.1
*.o
».»
• .0
34.2
1.1
».l
It. 2
».l
I.I
1.1
223
X
«»
49
89
*
1S7
4f
134
X
2»l
134
X
X
4S
X
45
AL6AL
UNITS
8 %C_ PER ML
51 1.41 40
1
•I
4
3
62.3
7.3
7.3
2.9
1.4
1.4
7.3
8.7
1721
201
X
201
X
X
10
40
40
X
X
X
201
X
X
X
X
X
241
X
ALGAL
UNIT*
8 %C PER ML
43.9
4.1
2.4
2.4
12.2
7.1
9.1
4.1
X
X
X
3*1
40
X
20
20
X
X
X
X
X
X
101
«0
it
X
X
40
X
X
2.4| 20
1 X
9.11 ft
1 X
1474
2772
126
43
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/3-79-122
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN WYOMING LAKES
5. REPORT DATE
December 1979
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
L.R. Williams, S.C. Hern, V.W. Lambou, F.A. Morris,
M.K. Morris, and W.D. Taylor
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Las Vegas, NV 89114
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BD884
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Las Vegas, NV
Office of Research and Development
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, NV 89114
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
02-21-75 to 12-11-75
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/07
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This is a data report presenting the species and abundance of phytoplankton
in the 14 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Wyoming. Results from the calculation of several water quality indices are also
included (Nygaard's Trophic State Index, Palmer's Organic Pollution Index, and
species diversity and abundance indices).
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
COS AT I Field/Group
*aquatic microbiology
lakes
*phytoplankton
water quality
Wyoming
lake eutrophication
Nygaard's trophic pollu-
tion indices
Species diversity and
abundance
06 C,
08 H
13 B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
21. I
3. OF PAGES
20 SECURITY CLASS (This page}
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
------- |