EPA-450/3-74-061
NOVEMBER 1974
              DETERMINATION
          OF THE FEASIBILITY
         OF THE  LONG-RANGE
       TRANSPORT OF OZONE
      OR OZONE  PRECURSORS
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      Office of Air and Waste Management
   Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
   Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

-------
                                EPA-450/3-74-061
    DETERMINATION
  OF  THE FEASIBILITY
  OF  THE LONG-RANGE
 TRANSPORT OF OZONE
OR OZONE PRECURSORS
                by

       D.L. Blumenthal, W.H. White,
        R.L. Peace, andT.B. Smith

        Meteorology Research, Inc.
      Box 637, 464 West Woodbury Road
        Altadena, California 91001
        (A Subsidiary of Cohu , Inc . )
         Contract No. 68-02-1462
     EPA Project Officer:  E.L.Martinez
     Monitoring and Data Analysis Division
            Prepared for

    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     Office of Air and Waste Management
   Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
     Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27711
            November 1974

-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers.  Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees,  current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - as supplies permit - from the Air
Pollution Technical Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road,  Springfield,
Virginia 22161.
This report was furriit.hed to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Meteorology Research, Inc. , Altadena, California, in fulfillment of
Contract No. 68 02 14b2.   The contents of this report are reproduced herein
as received from Meteorology Research, Inc.   The opinions, findings, and
conclusions exprebsed are those of the author and not necessarily those of
the Environmental Protection Agency.  Mention of company or product names
is not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
This report was prepared with the cooperation of the California Air Resources
Board, Sacramento, California.
                     Publication No. EPA-450/3-74-061
                                      n

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                            Page

I.     INTRODUCTION                                          1

H.    EXPORT OF OZONE AND OZONE PRECURSORS
      FROM URBAN AREAS                                     3

      A.    Los Angeles Basin                                  3

           1.     Background                                    3
           2.     July 25, 1973                                 11

                 a.    Summary of Day                         11
                 b.    Trajectory  Analysis                     15
                 c.    Analysis of Pollutant Data               21

           3.     September 21, 1972                           28

                 a.    Summary of Day                         28
                 b.    Trajectory  Analysis                     28
                 c.    Analysis of Pollutant Data               31

      B.    Denver on November 21, 1973                       38

in.   OZONE IN RURAL AREAS                                47

      A.    August 16, 1973,  Arrowhead and Hesperia           47
      B.    Lake  Arrowhead on August 24,  1973                 57

IV.   OZONE ALOFT -  MECHANISMS AND PERSISTENCE       72

      A.    Mechanisms for Trapping Pollutants in
             Layers Aloft                                     72
      B.    Overnight Persistence of Ozone                     75
      C.    Ozone Persistence in Rain                          83

V.    ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL DOWNWIND EFFECTS       86

VI.   CONCLUSIONS                                          89

VII.   REFERENCES                                           90

VIII.  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS                                   92
                                 ill

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)


APPENDIX A -  DATA FROM JULY 25, 1973 AND
                 SEPTEMBER 21,  1972

APPENDIX B -  CHARACTERIZATION OF DENVER'S URBAN
                 PLUME USING AN INSTRUMENTED AIRCRAFT
                                IV

-------
                        LIST OF FIGURES
Figure

Chapter I

Chapter II

II-1


II-2



II-3


II-4


II-5


II-6


II-7


II-8



II-9


II-10


11-11


II-12
                                                 Page
No figures
Map of the Los Angeles Air Basin Showing
East and West Basins                                4

Los Angeles Basin Mean Wind Flow for Days
with Low Level Inversions During August
1970 at 1600 PDT                                   6

Results of Metronics,  Inc. Tracer Release
October 24,  1972 (Metronics, Inc., 1973)             7

Vertical Profile Over  Brackett (BRA)
July 25,  1973,  1707  PDT                             9

Surface Ozone Concentrations (pphm),
1600-1700 PDT,  July 25,  1973                      12

Vertical Cross-Section of bscat for Midday,
July 25,  1973                                      13

Vertical Cross-Section of bscaf. for Afternoon
of July 25, 1973                                    14

Vertical Profile Over  El Monte (EMT) July 25,
1973, 1655 PDT, After Passage of Sea Breeze
Front                                              16

Vertical Profile Over  Cable  (CAB) July 25,
1973, 1636 PDT                                    17

Trajectory Envelope for Air Arriving at Cable
Airport (Upland)  1600  PDT,  July 25, 1973           19

Trajectory Envelope for Air Arriving Over
Redlands at 1800 PDT, July  25, 1973                19

Surface Wind Streamlines - 1600 PDT,
July 25,  1973                                      20

-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure                                                        Page

11-13         Approximate Time (PDT) of Arrival of Sea
             Breeze, July 25,  1973                             20

II- 14         Pollutant Loadings in Surface Mixed Layer
             Along Trajectory Arriving at Redlands in
             Afternoon of July 25,  1973                          22

II- 15         Estimated Ozone  Flux from Western to
             Eastern Basin, July 25, 1973, 1700 PDT            23

11-16         Vertical Sounding at Brackett (BRA)
             July 25, 1973, 1707 PDT                           25

11-17         Vertical Profile Over Corona (COR)
             July 25, 1973, 1724 PDT                           26

11-18         Peak Ozone  Concentrations (pphm) Aloft at
             Midday, September 21,  1972,  1230-1430 PDT       29

11-19         Peak Ozone  Concentrations (pphm) Aloft in
             Late Afternoon,  September 21, 1972                29

11-20         The Mean Trajectory and Trajectory Envelope
             of the Air Arriving Over Redlands at 1730 PDT,
             September 21, 1972                                30

11-21         Streamline Analysis  - 1600 PDT, September
             21,  1972                                           30

11-22         Vertical Profile Over Redlands (RED)
             September 21, 1972,  1320 PDT                     32

11-23         Vertical Profile Over Redlands (RED)
             September 21, 1972,  1736 PDT                     33

11-24         Vertical Sounding Over Long Beach (LGB)
             September 21, 1972,  1352 PDT                     34

11-25         Vertical Sounding Over Brackett (BRA)
             September 21, 1972,  1625 PDT                     35
                                VI

-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure                                                        Page

11-26         Pollutant Loadings in Surface Mixed Layer
             Along Trajectory Arriving at Redlands at
             1730 PDT,  September 21, 1972                     36

II-27a        Trajectory for Air Arriving at Standley Lake
             1130 MST,  11/21/73                               39

II-27b        Morning Mixing Layer Pollutant Data               39

II-27c        Midday Mixing Layer Pollutant Data                39

II-28a        Vertical Profiles Over EPA Trailer (Site 1)
             on November 21,  1973,  0925 MST                   40

II-28b        Vertical Profiles Over EPA Trailer (Site I)
             on November 21,  1973,  1242 MST                   41

II-29a        Vertical Profiles Over Henderson  (Site 2)
             on November 21,  1973,  0915 MST                   42

II-29b        Vertical Profiles Over Henderson  (Site 2)
             on November 21,  1973,  1234 MST                   43

II-30a        Vertical Profiles Over Standley Lake (Site 3)
             on November 21,  1973,  0822 MST                   44

II-30b        Vertical Profiles Over Standley Lake (Site 3)
             on November 21,  1973,  1135 MST                   45

Chapter III

III-1         Los Angeles Basin and Surrounding Areas           48

III-2         Hourly Average Oxidant Concentrations and
             Surface Winds Measured at Skyforest Ranger
             Station,  August 16,  1973                           49

in-3         Vertical Profile Over Arrowhead (ARR)
             August 16,  1973,  0939 PDT                         50
                                vii

-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure                                                        Page

III-4         Vertical Profile Over Arrowhead (ARR)
             August 16,  1973, 1645 PDT                         52

III-5         Vertical Profile Over Hesperia (HES)
             August 16,  1973, 0904 PDT                         53

III-6         Vertical Profile Over Hesperia (HES)
             August 16,  1973, 1656 PDT                         54

III-7         Streamlines for 1600 PDT on 8/16/73                55

III-8         Vertical Profile Over Rialto (RIA)
             August 16,  1973, 1337 PDT                         58

III-9         Vertical Profile Over Redlands (RED)
             August 16,  1973, 1317 PDT                         59

III-10        Hourly Average Oxidant Concentrations
             Measured at Skyforest Ranger Station,
             August 24,  1973                                    60

III-11        Vertical Profile Over Arrowhead (ARR)
             August 24,  1973, 0842 PDT                         61

III-12        Vertical Profile Over Arrowhead (ARR)
             August 24,  1973, 1530 PDT                         62

III-13        Vertical Profile Over Hesperia (HES)
             August 24,  1973, 0831 PDT                         66

III-14        Vertical Profile Over Hesperia (HES)
             August 24,  1973, 1546 PDT                         67

111-15        Streamlines for 1600 PDT,  8/24/73                 68

III-16        Vertical Profile Over Cable (CAB)
             August 24,  1973, 1200 PDT                         69

III-17        Vertical Profile Over Rialto (RIA)
             August 24,  1973, I32IPDT                         70
                                vna

-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure

Chapter IV

IV-1         Vertical Profile at El Monte (EMT) July 25,
             1973,  1656 PDT,  Showing Undercutting by
             the Sea Breeze

IV-2         Vertical Profile Over Brackett (BRA) July 26,
             1973,  0825 PDT,  Showing Buoyant Plume and
             Undercutting by Radiation Inversion

IV-3         Vertical Profile at Rialto (RIA) July 19, 1973,
             1738 PDT, Showing Layer Caused by Upslope
             Flow

IV-4         Vertical Profile Over Riverside (RAL)
             July 26, 1973, 1638 PDT

IV-5         Vertical Profile Over Riverside (RAL)
             July 26, 1973, 2239 PDT

IV-6         Vertical Profile Over Riverside (RAL)
             July 27, 1973, 0122 PDT

IV-7         Vertical Profile Over Riverside (RAL)
             July 27, 1973, 0500 PDT

IV-8         Vertical Profile Over Shepherd (SHE) in the
             Rain,  October 18,  1972,  1020  PDT

IV-9         Vertical Profile Over Shepherd (SHE) in the
             Rain,  October 18,  1972,  1357  PDT

Chapter V

V-l          Vertical Profile at Redlands (RED)
             August 16, 1973,  1700 PDT
Page
 73
 74
 76
  79
  80
  81
  82
  84
  85
  87
                               IX

-------
                        LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                         Page

Chapter I    No tables

Chapter II

II-1          Estimated Average Daily Emissions in 1970
             in Metric Tons Per Day                              5

Chapter III

III-l         August 16,  1973 Pibal Data                          56

III-2         August 24,  1973 Pibal Data                          63

Chapter IV

IV-1         Overnight Ozone Concentrations                     77
                               x

-------
I.    INTRODUCTION

      Recent studies (Kelly, 1970; Ripperton, 1974) have indicated the
presence of ozone in rural areas at levels which exceed the Federal
Ambient Air Standard of 0. 08 ppm.  The source of this ozone remains
in doubt,  and speculation as to its origin ranges from injection into the
troposphere from the stratosphere to long-range transport of ozone from
urban areas.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is  interested
in resolving the question of the source of the high levels of ozone because
of the implications for control strategy and standards setting.  This
study attempts to  show that at least in some instances,  high levels of
ozone in rural areas can be due  to transport  from urban sources as far
away as 100 km or more.

      In the last few years, Meteorology Research,  Inc. (MRI), has
conducted numerous and extensive three-dimensional air pollutant
studies using an airborne  sampling system.   Vertical,  as well as
horizontal,  data have been obtained for O3 ,  CO,  NOX,  SO2, condensation
nuclei,  scattering coefficient (bsca^), temperature,  turbulence, and
relative humidity.   Detailed meteorological data were also obtained during
most of the programs.  These studies have been performed in places
such as Los Angeles, St.  Louis,  Denver,  the San Joaquin Valley,
Alaska, New Mexico, and  Oregon with the most extensive data package
having been obtained for the Los Angeles (L. A. ) Basin  and its sur-
roundings.


      The MRI data  generally show a background ozone  level of 0. 04
ppm or  slightly lower in clean air.  In all the MRI studies, even  in
rural areas,  when the Oa level exceeded about 0.05  ppm, a distinct
surface-based mixing layer or layer  aloft was definable.  Within this
layer other indications of pollutants such as elevated levels of conden-
sation nuclei or light scattering coefficient (bsca{.) were also present.
Outside of the layer, the ozone concentration, as well as those of other
pollutants dropped to clean air values. In general, the  polluted layers
aloft were easily explainable in terms  of transport aloft from the
surface by normal meteorological means.  This indicates that, at least
for the cases studied by MRI, the ozone exceeding the background level
was  of surface origin.

      The object of the present study is to determine the feasibility of
transport of ozone or its precursors  from urban source areas  to rural
receptor areas far downwind.  This is done by the careful study of selected
pollutant episodes in which various phases of the transport process can
be well  documented.  While the case  histories selected  are considered

-------
typical of pollutant episodes, no attempt is made to relate them to annual
statistics.   The data used in this study were obtained under various
contracts with the California Air Resources  Board and the Environmental
Protection  Agency.

      To begin  with, the export of ozone or its precursors from Los Angeles
and Denver is documented.  Relatively rural areas such as Redlands,
downwind of Los Angeles, and  Standley Lake, downwind of Denver,  are
considered as receptor areas,  and several days when high ozone concen-
trations were observed during  the afternoon at these locations are taken
as examples.  Using the extensive winds aloft and surface wind data, the
ozone-laden air masses arriving at these locations are traced back for
several hours to sources over  industrialized and heavily populated urban
areas.  Some of the receptor areas themselves have sources of ozone pre-
cursors which may affect ozone concentrations even further  downwind.  For
the episodes studied,  however, analysis of the pollutant burdens  of the air
masses involved indicates that most of the ozone precursors present at
the receptor sites were picked up over the urban areas upwind, and that
most of the ozone  measured was  either exported directly from the urban
areas or formed en route as the air mass aged in the absence of extensive
new emissions.

      The case studies described above present a strong argument to
document the export of ozone or its precursors from urban areas for three
different days.   In order to  show the potential for multiday transport,
evidence of the overnight stability of ozone at elevated concentrations (more
than 0.10 ppm) in  aged polluted air is  presented, and the existence  of
ozone in the rain is documented.

      Examples are also presented of  high ozone concentrations confined
to the surface mixing layer  in the relatively  remote mountain and desert
areas east and  northeast of Los Angeles.  The ozone-laden air arriving at
these locations is  traced back to  the probable source of the ozone pre-
cursors in the Los Angeles  Air Basin.

      The bulk  of the  evidence  indicates  that urban areas can be a source
of high concentrations of ozone or ozone precursors found in at least a few
specific rural areas.   Based on a specific episode, an estimate of the
potential effect of a city the size  of Los Angeles on downwind ozone
concentrations  is made. Using standard diffusion estimates, it is shown
that an urban source of this size  could cause the ambient air ozone  standard
of 0. 08 ppm to  be  exceeded  as  far as 260 km downwind of the source.

-------
II.    EXPORT OF OZONE AND OZONE PRECURSORS FROM URBAN AREAS

      A.    Los Angeles Basin

            1.    Background

                 The Los Angeles air basin can be divided into two sub-
basins separated roughly by the  Chino Hills,  as shown in Fig.  II-1.
The western basin  encompasses the heavily urbanized portions of Los
Angeles and Orange Counties, while the eastern basin lies in more
rural San Bernardino and Riverside Counties.  As indicated in Table II-1,
the estimated daily emissions of primary pollutants in the eastern
basin are much lower than they are in the western basin.

                 As  shown in Fig. II-2 (from Smith et al., 1972),
afternoon surface winds during the summer months are predominantly
westerly, under the influence of the sea breeze.  It is clear from the
pattern of the surface winds that air is transported from the western
basin into the eastern basin during a typical summer  afternoon.  This
has been verified by recent tracer studies conducted for the California
Air Resources Board.  On seven summer and early fall  days in 1972
and 1973, Metronics Associates,  Inc.,  released color coded fluorescent
particles in the vicinity of Los Angeles  (CAP), Torrance (TOA), and
Santa Ana (SNA) (Vaughan and Stankunas, 1973,' 1974).  On most of these
days, particles from Los Angeles and Torrance were picked up in
Redlands (RED) by 1600 PDT.  An example is shown in Fig.  II-3.

                 Although transport fromthe we stern basin to the eastern
basin is now well documented, the magnitude of its effects on pollutant con-
centrations  downwind is difficult to establish  without knowledge of their
three-dimensional distribution.   As cooler marine air from the coast
is carried inland it is warmed by the ground,  and the mixing layer
deepens.  The resulting dilution of pollutants by clean air as they mix
through a deepening layer and other meteorological effects tend to
obscure the effects of transport on surface concentrations.  This study
uses data obtained during a three-dimensional pollutant mapping program
to gain a better understanding of the  transport phenomena at work in the
L.A. Basin and to obtain an estimate of the effects of pollutants exported
from the western basin on the concentrations observed in the eastern
basin.

-------
4

-------
                             Table II-1

            ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY EMISSIONS IN
                   1970 IN METRIC TONS PER DAY
               Los Angeles County*             Riverside County*
               and Orange County           and San Bernardino County*

RHC                  1395                            135

NO                   1210                            120
   .X

CO                   8820                            935

SO 2                   240                             40
      Figures are from the State of California Implementation Plan for
Achieving and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards,
California Air Resources Board,  1972.

      *Only that portion of the county lying within the South Coast Air
Basin is included.

-------
        I I"   f'-f }

       • '-M\ . < ?/

        "•-!"*J\
        r. .'' ^<  \
        •. j  ,  /   v
        . j

        -''£  -,
" -  r-'X  * h  K
:..  >P^^^o^
 ,'• • .*»-
 -j  ;'«„•

   ~*)
          ^ o
          O o
- ^.-»*v—. - — -  wj •_•   =• \  '   i

 /":-••  a?g^-\   ;
 S-   -  .'  W g fe.;-—5  r^
,r:- - ^ •  ,- -, o 2 M    ! ~j  O

y-;^- X§2s/^-")

->.-v-., i^8'J^'>. -
A-  .„-_ - O z w.  !(.• >.£-
t>;- ;;Va_->'

^•: V-^C





>v"V '^^.^3
                                                               W


                                                               >


                                                               W
                                                               o
                                                               •J

                                                               ffi
                                                               H
                                                               co
                                                                 n,
                                                               W

                                                               U
                                                               ro



                                                               H



                                                               bb

-------
                                cQ
                                 tr
                           0?
                                           9

                                         I
                                                k    u
                                                 ,





-------
                 On numerous summer and early fall days in 1972 and
1973, instrumented MRI aircraft mapped the three-dimensional distri-
bution of pollutant concentrations in the Los Angeles air basin
(Blumenthal et al. ,  1973,  1974).  The sampling consisted of a series
of vertical spirals over about  15 different locations  in the basin on any
given day. Two aircraft were used, and each location was sampled
three times per day.  Spirals were generally made from the top of the
mixing layer or haze layer to the surface.  The sampling days were
chosen for their high pollution potential, and the aircraft sampling was
coordinated with other on-going experiments (such as the Metronics
tracer studies) as often as  possible.  A data package was developed for
each sampling day which consisted of the aircraft data as well as surface
meteorological data, upper air wind data,  and  ground level pollution
data obtained  from all available sources.

                 Figure II-4 is an example of  the vertical profiles
produced from the  spirals.  Pollutant concentrations are plotted versus
altitude over Brackett Airport (BRA on Fig. II- I) at about 1707 PDT on
July 25,  1973.  The scale  at the bottom of  the figure indicates all the
parameters measured, but some of these parameters are often omitted
from the graphs for simplicity or because  of instrument malfunction.
In Fig. II-4,  an obvious temperature  inversion is present.  Pollutants
are trapped in the well-mixed layer below  the inversion,  while con-
centrations above the inversion are much lower.  In general, high,
well correlated bscaj. and ozone levels along with low condensation
nuclei and NOX levels indicate a photo chemically aged air mass.  High
levels of condensation nuclei and primary pollutants (such as CO and
NOX) along with low ozone levels and  a poor correlation between bscat
and ozone indicate fresh emissions below the inversion level.  Below
the inversion level,  in Fig. II-4, some fresh emissions are mixed into
an aged air mass.  The air above the mixing layer,  although  cleaner,
includes  some well-aged pollutants with no fresh emissions.

                 A useful technique for studying the total pollutant
budget within  an air mass  is to integrate the pollutant concentration
through the depth of the mixing layer, thus obtaining the total pollutant
burden over a point on the ground.  This technique lets one follow the
growth of the pollutant burden in the air mass as the air moves along
a trajectory and yet takes  into account changes in depth of the mixing
layer along the way.  The  integrals of various  pollutants  throughout the
mixing layer are used in some of the  analyses  which follow.  When
aircraft data are available  for a given point,  an actual integration is
performed. In some locations,  however, ground data are used to
supplement the aircraft data.  In these cases,  the ground concentration

-------
                                 o
                                 ro

                                 fl
                                 O
i  m x ui
                    P
                                                  o
                                                  o
                                 i —
                                 w
                    o
                    r--
                                                                           LT)

                                                                           (M
                                                                           tti
                                                                           cq


                                                                           H
                                                                           H
                                                                           W
                                                                           W
                                                                           U
                                                                           cq

                                                                           ffj
                                                                           H
                                                                           >
                                                                           O

                                                                           H
                                                                           O
                                                                           U
                                                                           h— I

                                                                           EH

                                                                           Pi

                                                                           W
                                                                           00
aaruinv

-------
is assumed constant throughout the mixing height and is merely
multiplied  by the prevailing mixing height in the area.  The integral
used Is given below.
                              MH
                            GL
In Eq. (1)

      X      = Any pollutant

      [X]    = Concentration of X at height Z
         jLt

      L  -IfiG  = Background concentration of X

      GL    = Ground level

      MH    = Mixing heights

The integral LX will be referred to as the loading of X,  distinguished
from  the concentration of X.  One  effect of correcting for background
concentrations in the integral is to render unnecessary the exact
determination of mixing height if there is a relatively  clean layer above
the mixed layer.  Background concentrations of 1  ppm for CO and 0. 04
ppm for  ozone were used in the analyses.

                 Mixing layer heights were determined from the air-
craft  soundings.  The soundings were examined for points where values
of the various meteorological and pollutant parameters decreased (or in-
creased) significantly.  In general, turbulence  was the primary parameter
used, with the bgca^. profile providing the next best source of information.
Temperature and humidity profiles and the vertical profiles of other
pollutants were  also used.  In identifying a top  to the mixed layer,  as
much emphasis as  possible was placed on the physical consistency
among the various  parameters.  Discrepancies between the various
parametric definitions were  reconciled as they appeared.  In many
situations, the definition of the mixing layer height was simple and
unequivocal.  In others, the  most consistent definition was used.

                 In the following analyses,  surface ozone data obtained
from  local air pollution districts are used.  Since the  calibration method
used  by the L. A. APCD is different from that used by all other agencies
in the L.A. Basin, all L.A. APCD ozone data used  in this report are
adjusted to be consistent with the other agency  calibration procedures.

                 In the remainder of Section A we study the transport
of ozone and its precursors from the western basin across the eastern
                                 10

-------
basin to Redlands, identified by the code RED in Fig. II-1.  Our
discussion is based on two specimen days for which pollutant  loadings
in the mixed layer,  together with winds aloft and at the surface,  were
measured.

            2.     July 25, 1973

                  a.    Summary of Day

                       July 25,  1973 was the second day of a major
smog episode.  The California Air  Resources Board station at Upland
(CAB on Fig. II-5) reported an average ozone concentration of 60 pphm
for the  hour beginning 1600 PDT, the highest such concentration recorded
in the Los Angeles Basin that year.  Figure II-5 shows that surface
concentrations were generally high in the northern  part of the eastern
basin at this time.

                       Meteorological conditions on July 25,  1973 were
typical  of those associated with heavy smog in the Los Angeles Basin.
Throughout the day a strong subsidence inversion covered the whole
basin at about 1000 m msl while a marine inversion sloped upward from
about 300 m msl near the coast until it merged with the subsidence
inversion roughly 40 km inland.   The structure  of this double inversion
is revealed in Figs. II-6 and II-7, which show approximately  west to east
vertical cross-sections of the light-scattering coefficient, b scat,  at
the beginning and end of the afternoon.  These figures were prepared
using the aircraft sounding data at the locations indicated.

                       During the night and morning hours the surface
flow in  the basin was either stagnant or had a slight offshore component,
allowing the buildup of pollutants  within the  surface layer. In Fig. II-6,
the highest  concentrations are seen within the source region in the
western basin.  Although some of the bscat  in this figure is due to
humidity effects,  much of it results from emissions accumulated  in
a relatively stagnant air mass.  At the time represented in Fig. II-6,
the sea  breeze had just recently started, and clean air had not yet
come onshore to flush out the basin.

                       Later in the afternoon,  as  shown in Fig. II-7,
the sea  breeze had ventilated much of the surface layer in the western
basin,  replacing air which had had a long residence time over land with
cleaner air  with a short time onshore.  The sea breeze "front" in
Fig. II-7 is between El Monte (EMT) and Brackett (BRA).  The air
just ahead of the "front" had accumulated emissions over the western
basin earlier in the  day and possibly during  the night before,  and had
the longest residence time over strong source areas of any air in the
                                 11

-------
_HV_
..34V
                               12

-------
O
O
in
                                               C.  ro
                                               H
                                               Q
                                                   ui
                                                   CM
                                                   P
                                                   hi
                                                   Q
                                                   Q
                                     O
                                                    n)
                                                    O
                                                    to
                                               -  O
                                                   o
                                                   I— I
                                                   H
                                                   U
                                               H
                                               g
                                               ui

                                              S3
                                              u—
                                               H
                                               Q
                                               H
                                               Q
                                                   Si
                                                   O o
                                                   U
                                                   vD
                                                    I
                                                   ao
o
o
o
o
o
                  (ui)
        13

-------
                                                CO


                                                ff—*


                                                in"


                                                ^
                                                O
                                                O
                                                H
                                                O
                                                fc
                                                XI
                                               O
                                               EH
                                               U
                                               w
                                               w  >
                                               g   E
                                               g'o
                                               u
                                               W  £
                                               >  5
                                                be
(uu)
   14

-------
basin.  Note that the highest concentrations in Fig. II-7 are over Upland
(CAB) at the time which corresponds to the peak ozone reading at
Upland (and in the basin) for the day.

                       In both Figs. II-6 and II-7 upper layers are seen
between the two inversions in the western basin.  Pollutant concentra-
tions remain high in the layers all day, but the aircraft sounding and
pibal data indicate that these layers are decoupled from the air below.
The air in the upper layers is  well aged and relatively stagnant
compared to surface air.  These layers may be caused by upslope
flow along some of the nearby  hills,  by lifting or undercutting of polluted
air by the sea breeze,  or by other means; but in any case they should
not have a significant  effect on the results of the analyses presented in
this section.

                       The difference between the air in front of and
behind the sea breeze  front is  seen in Figs. II-8 and H-9.  Figure II-8
is a vertical profile over El Monte after the passage of the front.  A
surface mixing layer is well defined by the temperature, turbulence,
and pollutant profiles extending up to about 400 m msl.  Within this
layer, the bsca^. and ozone values have dropped down from their peaks
for the day.  The condensation nuclei values are still high, however,
indicating continuing fresh emissions.  The air between about 400 and
600 m msl is moderately well aged but still has a moderate condensation
nuclei population, possibly indicating that this air was previously part
of the  surface mixing layer but recently undercut by the advancing sea
breeze.  The remainder of the layer aloft could be a remnant of the
layer existing earlier  in the midday soundings.

                       Figure II-9 is a vertical profile at Upland (CAB)
before the passage of the front.  The mixing layer is well defined and
pollutant concentrations are high within the layer.   The ozone concen-
tration exceeds 0. 5  ppm.  The air, within the mixing layer at Upland is
similar  to that just above the  sea breeze in Fig. II-8.  This profile
represents the period  of peak ozone concentration at Upland and in  the
basin for the day.

                 b.    Trajectory Analysis

                       Winds  aloft on July 25,  1973 were measured at
four stationary sites.   Pilot balloons (pibals) were released hourly at
Chino (CNO),  in the eastern basin, and at Elysian Park,  midway
between Hollywood (HOL) and the Los Angeles Railroad Yard (LARR)
in the western basin.  In addition, pilot balloons were  released at
1233 PDT from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX),  and at 1335
and 1654 PDT from  El  Monte Airport (EMT).
                                15

-------


c
o
g
V
0
-o 6
§ oo
0 <«
o
5 _.. .. »„ x ojxw J"p
£ ZN 0 *- [^
in O^
- f- O Z -3
3 5 £ M 0 0
CO *J * O U O







*•*•••







•V*

"'
£3"

f t'
O W 4*




*-•-*
»• »• *•


1



w
XX**
M

kj^**.. *

\ ° *^*
•-»xf "



. „
«•""" '




'


,
t*"****

M W
»»'*VS'J*'
W-'

1 * •








' M
r

~S
/
"w
V •
. W
*-» ,
*'**/ /
v.-**-* '

u u " u u


, "
•-«
M



.•

1


C
X>W

u^
1


£ i § o §
x-S t E E u ^ E""J' -
 o "^ t"n C in
S*!g£ = tt ^A -g
Hi§ . i So
< mSo^S i 8 >-iPi
-SS'.l g 0--o iSgl S fe
ZwWKg 5z°° "aS
sills 1 1 1 Pg
aujuu< j LiN
* M W
10 0 P o W W

M ' M
\y
„


,,
j
•'
*
c
to
M
»'
.«

W "


.
"\
M
§ *•
1
.
1 *
" *" 1

^

c
1 •
-,
1 * * <

I *
••If
\1
K
O
U
*•
i
,

/v


•f .«-"



^wA.
• w
> ri*
:5***«"
1
e
i


t""*"
u

,
n-m-m
\'
M


- »» P-

.
w
»•*•••

IX • •


•


J 41 U


, _
O

5 -



2 •


CM
6 "



5 '

-



o -
»
; -
0 .
o
m •

s -

s -
s -

c •

o .

« -



o -

s -
u? -
o
10

m
CM '

o .
CM
m



m •

o -



 s
* n ^
H PL,
•— i pi
A h H
pi h
-1 ,
U Q
O h— 1 ^ <
H
Pi J^J

~ > ^S
00

h-H
1— 1

•
o ko
§o o o y
O 0 W

-------
                                                       s
                                                          ZtM O   I-  X nXUJ
evation
i
fH C
in
1 ^
0
IH
U


U)
z
g
i-
<
. a:
a:
UJ
5*3
Is
(7>X
5

u
u
z
o
u
UJ
z
M
a
2

I
H
<£.
UJ
GREATI




E
a.
0
in


                                                       II11"  *JK

ixd? 8
w
TEMPERA!
i s
*Jsi
1 *
                                                           "9   o  10   o
                                                               o _
                                                               o
                                                                 H
O
S
o
o
CJ
§
o
o
s
o
o
(O
o
o
i
                                           _jo -»o
                                            o
                                                                  o  .
                                                    q .
                                                                      o _
                                                                        P
                                                                    O  i^
                                                                                     ro
                                                                                  a,
                                                                                  ^

                                                                                  S
                                                                                  i— i
                                                                                  EH
                                                                                  PJ
                                                                                  H
                          aaniaiv
                                   17

-------
                       Figures 11-10 and 11-11 show trajectories,
computed from these wind observations, for the  air arriving over
Upland (CAB) at 1600 PDT and Redlands (RED) at 1800 PDT.  The
extreme northerly and southerly winds within the mixed layer (from
pibal observations) were used to construct an envelope of possible
trajectories, and the mean wind within the mixed layer was  used to
construct a characteristic trajectory.  Surface wind  streamlines for
1600 PDT are shown in Fig.  11-12 for reference  purposes.   The
trajectories in Figs. 11-10 and 11-11 indicate that much of the air over
Upland at the time of peak ozone at that location  was  onshore before
the sea breeze started, probably having accumulated pollutants since
the night before,  while much of the air over Redlands at the end of
the afternoon had come onshore with the start of the  sea breeze.  The
air arriving over Upland at 1600 PDT had the longest residence  time
in the western basin of any air arriving over Upland that day,  which
may account for the timing of the ozone maximum there.

                       The streamlines and trajectories indicate
that polluted western basin air was advected into the eastern basin
during the afternoon of July 25.  This conclusion is corroborated by
the afternoon gradients in  surface ozone concentration, which clearly
show the advance of cleaner air from the coast with the onset of the
sea breeze.  The hourly average surface ozone concentrations from
1600 to 1700 PDT (shown previously in Fig. II-5) provide a  snapshot
of this effect, showing a strong gradient between La Habra (LAH) and
downtown Los Angeles (CAP),  which had already been flushed with
marine air, and Azusa (AZU) and Upland (CAB), which had not.   By
1600 PDT the marine layer had reached El  Monte (EMT), and was
sharply delineated in a vertical sounding made at 1655 PDT  (Fig. II-8).

                       Figure 11-13 shows  the approximate  times at
which the sea breeze began to flush  various locations in the  basin
during the afternoon.  These times were determined from California
Air Resources Board and local Air Pollution Control  Districts
(APCD) ozone data  according to an objective criterion: the approximate
time of arrival of the sea breeze is  calculated as M:00 PDT, where M
is the first integer  i such that  X^_|_j ^1/2 X^_ j, Xj being the average
ozone concentration during the hour  beginning at i:00 PDT.   Comparison
of Fig. 11-13 with the trajectories to Upland and  Redlands in Figs. II-10
and 11-11  shows that these trajectories depict air moving just ahead of
the advancing cleaner  sea air.   From 1600  to 1900 PDT the  marine
front moved about 70 km inland for an average speed of about 23 km
per hour, in good agreement with observed wind speeds.

-------
Fig.  H-IO.  TRAJECTORY ENVELOPE FOR AIR ARRIVING AT CABLE AIRPORT (UPLAND)
           1600 PDT, JULY 25, 1973
    ..Ufa'
     Fig.  n-Il.  TRAJECTORY ENVELOPE FOR AIR ARRIVING OVER REDLANDS AT 1800 PDT, JULY 25,  1973
                                           19

-------
Fig.  II-1Z.  SURFACE WIND STREAMLINES -  1600 PDT, JULY 25,  1973
Fig. H-13.  APPROXIMATE TIME (PDT) OF ARFJVAL OF SEA BREEZE, JULY 25,  1973
            (Objective criterion based on ground level ozone concentrations.)
                                      20

-------
       c.    Analysis of Pollutant Data

            Figure 11-14 shows how integrated contaminant loadings
 within the surface mixed layer changed along the trajectory to Redlands
 (RED).  Points on the figure were calculated as described earlier in
 Section II. A. 1, and both surface and aircraft data were used.  The
 aircraft data show that pollutants were well mixed within the mixing
 layer and  that the top of the surface mixing layer was always  well
 defined.  The western basin points do not include any contribution from
 the elevated layers.   Data points were calculated for locations in or
 near the trajectory envelope shown in Fig. 11-11.

            Although there  is considerable scatter in the data, the trends
 are  quite clear.  There are large increases in  the loadings of CO,  Os,
 and  visibility-reducing particulates between the coast and the boundary
 between the western and eastern basin (near Brackett (BRA))  across
 an area which includes most of the emission sources in the Los Angeles
 Basin.  East of Brackett (BRA) loadings of CO  actually declined, as
 local emissions in  the eastern basin were apparently not sufficient to
 offset the effects of dilution or reaction.  The emissions in the western
 basin were sufficient to account for the CO seen along the trajectory in
 the eastern basin.  Ozone loadings east of Brackett remained relatively
 constant, possibly due to continued formation of ozone by previously
 emitted precursors and to the  lack of fresh  emissions to scavenge it.

            Nearly all of the CO in the Los Angeles atmosphere comes
 from the exhaust of motor vehicles (California Air Resources Board
 1972).  Motor vehicles are also the source of about 75 percent of the
 NOx and 87 percent of the reactive hydrocarbons (Calif.  ARB, 1972).
 Using  CO as a tracer  for ozone precursors which were  not measured
 directly,  we can deduce that a large fraction of the ozone precursors
 introduced Into the air mass sampled at Redlands was emitted in the
 western basin.

            Additional information on  the amount of ozone transported
 into  the eastern basin can be obtained by doing a simple flux calculation.
 Figure 11-15 shows an estimate of the flux of ozone under the  subsidence
 inversion from the western basin into the eastern basin at 1700 PDT
 on July 25. The western face  of the box drawn  in the eastern  basin
 represents the boundary across which transport was calculated,  and
 the east-west dimension of  the box represents the distance covered  in
 one hour by the moving air.  In a steady-state situation in the absence
 of diffusion or diffluent winds,  the box would thus contain about 185
metric tons of ozone,  corresponding to a uniform concentration of
about 25 pphm.  For comparison, the average late afternoon concentrations
                                 21

-------
            o
            o
                                      WESTERN
                                       BASIN
EASTERN
 BASIN
             400
           w

           
            \
          I1
          8 : '
            "i
                                                 POM*
                                                     LA APCD 0, OAT* AOJUSUD
                                                     TO ACKCC WITH AW CALHRA-
                                                     TION MCIMOO
                                                           MO
                 & SUflFACC OATAIHOUKLTAVCKACt)
                      1)00
                             MOO     IWO     I tOO     1700
                               Tlm« (POT) Along Tra>€rl»ry
                                                           1*00
Fig.  II-14.   POLLUTANT LOADINGS IN SURFACE  MIXED LAYER
               ALONG TRAJECTORY ARRIVING AT REDLANDS IN
               AFTERNOON OF JULY 25,  1973

               (Aircraft measurements plus estimates made
               from ground data and  mixing height. )
                                     22

-------
                                                        LT>
                                                        z
                                                        I—I
                                                        CO
                                                        w
                                                        EH
                                                        CO
                                                        <;
                                                        w
                                                        o
                                                        H
                                                        W
                                                        H
                                                        co
                                                        H
                                                        O
                                                        x
                                                        w
                                                        2
                                                        o
                                                        N
                                                        o
                                                        Q
                                                        H
                                                        H H
                                                        <; P
                                                        in
                                                        tc
23

-------
of ozone within the surface mixed layer at Riverside (RAL), Redlands
(RED),  Rialto (RIA),  and Ontario  (ONT) were, respectively,  36,  24,
25, and 13 pphm.   (Data were taken from aircraft soundings.)  The
flux was calculated for about 1700 PDT since soundings were available
for roughly that time, but 1700 PDT was also roughly the time of
arrival of the sea breeze front.  Crude flux calculations for about 2
hours earlier indicated slightly greater flux and a correspondingly
higher average concentration in the box.
           In the absence of photochemistry, one ton (as NOs ) of
freshly emitted NOX (mostly NO) could scavenge about one ton of ozone
under conditions  of good mixing.  The daily emissions of NOX in the
entire  eastern basin are estimated to be only about 120 metric  tons.
Roth et al. , (1974) found that in the western basin,  about 16 percent of
a weekday's total car mileage was  driven between  1600 and 1800 PDT.
If this  8 percent per hour figure is used to  scale all NOX emissions to
hourly rates (for around 1700 PDT) one obtains an estimate of 10 metric
ton per hour for the  NOX emission  rate in the eastern basin.  This is
inadequate to scavenge more than a small fraction of the ozone advected in.

           The  estimate  of the ozone flux and the corresponding average
concentration in the  eastern basin "box" were based on the following
considerations :

           1.    A quasi- steady state prevailed for at least one hour  at
                 the boundary between the  basins.  This assumption
                 was quite good at the boundary even though  this was
                 not the case over the whole western basin as  the
                 progress of the sea breeze in Fig. 11-13 shows.
                 Pollutants which had accumulated in the western
                 basin for many hours were flushed out into  the eastern
                 basin by the sea breeze starting about midday. For
                 this reason, pollutant fluxes out of the western basin
                 are not  directly comparable to pollutant emissions
                 within the western basin.   The western basin was
                 "emptied" more rapidly than it was  "filled",  giving
                 rise to fluxes which were large in comparison with
                 emission rates.

           2.     Afternoon soundings at Brackett (BRA.) (Fig. II- 16)
                 and Corona (COR) (Fig. 11-17) showed a capping subsi-
                 dence inversion at about 860 m msl.  Ground elevations
                 east of the  Chino Hills slope from roughly 310 m msl at
                 Brackett to  1 65 m msl at  Corona; the Chino Hills  them-
                 selves  range 400-500 m msl,  and the width of the pass
                 between the western and eastern basins is 25-35 km.
                 The area across -which the flux was calculated was taken
                 as 25 km x (860 m ~ 3 10 m) ~ 1.4 x 10 7 m2.


                                  24

-------
e
o
a
IE
u ^
T3
C
J
O
l<

O
t  I
                                  - 2 «
                            o ,
                            o .
                            o .
                              o .
                                  _o
                                 2 n—
                                 o .
                                 o .
                                Jo Jo
                  H
                  W
                  M
                  U H
                  < P
                                          gm-
                                          IE
                  U R,
                  I—I

                  *2
                  g 0
                                          bO
      aoruiriv
               25

-------

O
'.M
id
1 6
\o
T3 r ,
e
3
O
t*
O







^ ^
^^•i-
^




w

•t
1
"X

• •>
«
•«fc
»
















•• •
w ^*"




.-

* K
M

•.•"•
„-*•'
*••
•

•

z
O







••(







•/
«•
•



'
















*•
^ ^
»





^•^^
•%,
"•
u *
.-.•"
•

m
- • u
" '
















-*•-.-..-






tf
M
*rfcM
** -*«.
M •
f **


•

U W
R * x r »
•'* ' •












•




w
•* M
M ^ P

•. "B
••3* •
p:








" «•«*
*• 4* W
































|
IO

-J
u ^.

z
^
g
*-
IW
J
£



















_1 	
j









c
2








•


•













1




„
'o

in
0


o



n
6 •

•
N
6 "




o



o -
\



1




3
J

O
m

O

** -
10 '
s -

in
cw
> .

C •

» .




o -




V



H
i
^
*
a
e
»
o

s

o
KJ •
g •

8 •
£ -

2 •

ifl •

1 .



X «0



3?J
*

^
S
9
^ 5

RtCATlVI
t
8
8

S

o

3

8 •
?-

7
10 •


eg
J .


3 -
KM

•_
f» ^
"C
5 5



s
Z w
u s
1
o 55
O
8g
Di Tf*
w K
« > ^"
0 "
W cr|
K J o^
w O •
0H ^
« H iJ
|S
> U
«
r-H

a
bo
s

3
aonnnv
          26

-------
                 The 1700 PDT winds aloft at Chino (CNO) were above
                 32 km per hour throughout the mixed layer, and the
                 1700 PDT surface winds at Chino, La Verne College
                 (POC), and Ontario (ONT) were all 27 km per hour.
                 All wind directions in this area were near due west.
                 The rate at which  air was transported into the eastern
                 basin was taken to be:
                 1.4 x 107 m2 x 27 km/hr ~  3. 8 x 1011 m3/hr.
                 The average ozone concentrations measured between
                 310 and 860 m msl on the 1700 PDT Brackett and
                 Corona soundings were,  respectively, 33. 5 pphm =
                 660 flg/m3 and 16.8 pphm = 330 /ig/m3.  These were
                 slightly lower than the corresponding values for the
                 1500 PDT soundings.  The distribution of ozone con-
                 centrations at the  surface indicates that  concentrations
                 between Brackett and Corona were generally inter-
                 mediate in value.  The rate at which ozone was
                 advected into the  eastern basin was  estimated to lie
                 between 3.8 x 1011 m3/hr x 660 jUg/hr ~ 250 metric
                 tons/hr.  and
                 3.8 x 1011 m3/hr x 330 M/hr ~ 125 metric tons/hr.
           Using this crude technique, it is clear that much of the
ozone loading in the eastern basin on the afternoon of July 25 can be
accounted for by  advection from the western basin.  In light of the
preceding analyses, it is probable that a significant portion of the
24 pphm of ozone within the mixed layer arriving at Redlands at about
1800 PDT had its origin in the western basin.  Redlands is approximately
100 km from the  area south of Los Angeles  where the trajectory origi-
nated,  thus it is reasonably certain that large source areas such as
Los Angeles  and  Orange counties can and do export  a significant amount
of ozone and  ozone  precursors to distant surrounding areas.

           July 25, 1973,  was used in this  analysis since a considerable
amount of data was available for that day, but similar evidence can be
provided for  numerous  days in the Los Angeles  Basin.  In Section
II. A. 3, following, another day is analyzed in less detail to support the
conclusions reached here.

           Soundings and other data used in this analysis  and not
presented here are included in Appendix A.
                                 27

-------
            3.    September 21,  1972

                 a.    Summary of Day

                       September  21,  1972 was a day of relatively
light smog.  Pollutants were mixed through a deep layer inland, due to
intense surface heating.  Surface O3 concentrations were generally below
20 pphm,  and the highest concentration encountered aloft was 33 pphm.

                       Figure 11-18  shows the peak ozone concentrations
measured within the mixing layer in  the midday (1230 - 1430 PDT)
aircraft soundings.  The morning winds aloft were generally northerly,
and the highest ozone concentrations and loadings measured were  found
in the southern part of the western basin.  Figure 11-19 shows the
changed situation observed in the afternoon (1600 - 1800 PDT) soundings.
The eastern basin, which was quite clean at midday due to Santa Ana
(northeasterly) winds continuing  from September 20, developed elevated
ozone concentrations throughout  the mixed layer in the afternoon.  The
portion of the western basin sampled had, meanwhile,  cleared out
considerably with  the advent of the sea breeze which developed after the
Santa Ana condition subsided.

                 b.    Trajectory Analysis

                       Extensive observations  of winds aloft were made
on September 21,  1972  as  part of the Metronics  tracer study mentioned
earlier, although no tracer was released on  this date.   From 0700 to
1800 PDT,  one pilot balloon was  released each hour from each of  four
locations which moved along routes shown in Fig. 11-20 as-a series of
squares.  The release locations  were intended to approximately
follow air parcel trajectories, beginning  in the  western part of the basin
in the morning and ending  in the  eastern sections by late afternoon.

                       Figure 11-20  shows trajectories, computed from
these wind observations, for the  air arriving at Redlands at 1730 PDT.
As for July 25, 1973, the extreme  northerly and southerly winds
within the mixed layer were used to construct an envelope of possible
trajectories, and the vector mean wind within the mixed layer was used
to construct a characteristic trajectory.  As shown in Fig. 11-20,  a
probable track of the air arriving at  Redlands is from the industrial
section south of Los Angeles through Pomona and Ontario to Redlands.
Surface wind streamlines during  the afternoon (Fig. 11-21) support this
conclusion.
                               28

-------
Fig.  II-18.  PEAK OZONE CONCENTRATIONS (pphm) ALOFT AT MIDDAY, SEPTEMBER 21,  1972,
            12:30 - 14:30 PDT

      Fig  11-19.     PEAK OZONE CONCENTRATIONS (pphm) ALOFT IN LATE  AFTERNOON
                                           SEPTEMBER 21.  1972
                                       29

-------
Fig. 11-20.  THE MEAN TRAJECTORY AND TRAJECTORY  ENVELOPE OF THE AIR ARRIVING OVER
             REDLANDS AT 17:30 PDT,  SEPTEMBER 21. 1972
             (Times along the trajectory are the times the air passed that line. )
                           4 «»tD srtCD U
                           /   I0tt'l«4k«
                     I .1   /

                          /VISIIILITY (•»
                     , ,.   ».I.H..



                         i UPPCM LEVEL WINDS
   Fig. 11-21.  STREAMLINE ANALYSIS -  1600 PDT, SEPTEMBER 21,  1972
                                         30

-------
                 c.    Analysis of Pollutant Data

                       Figures 11-22 and 11-23 compare soundings made
over Redlands at 1320 and 1736 PDT on September 21, 1972.  The
light-scattering coefficient observed on the midday flight was below 10  m"
at all levels, and indicated a local v'sual range of 55 km (35  miles) or
more.   By afternoon,  the light-scattering coefficient was about
4x10   m   at all levels, corresponding to a local visual range of about
10 km  (6 miles).

                       The appearance late in the day of elevated O3 and
b     concentrations in the eastern basin is difficult to understand in terms
of local sources.  No inversion was present during the afternoon in the
eastern basin to hold reactants near the ground at high concentrations.
There  was less  solar energy to drive reactions in the afternoon than
there had been at midday.  There is no  reason to assume that diurnal
patterns of emissions in the eastern basin are dramatically different
from those in the western  basin, where O3  concentrations nearly always
decrease  during the afternoon.

                       The afternoon increase of O3 concentrations in the
eastern basin is most easily explained  in terms of advection, since most
of the eastern basin air sampled in the afternoon  sounds was passing
through the western basin  during the midday soundings.  Figure 11-20 shows
that the air in the 1736 sounding at Redlands (RED) was apparently just
entering the eastern basin through the pass  at La Verne  (POC) when the
1625 sounding was taken at nearby Brackett Airport (BRA).   During the
midday soundings,  some of this same air may have been as far west  as
Long Beach (LGB) and downtown Los Angeles (CAP).

                       Figures 11-23,  11-24 and 11-25 show aircraft
soundings taken at Long Beach (1352 PDT), (Brackett 1625 PDT), and
Redlands  (1736 PDT), corresponding roughly to the itinerary outlined
above.  Figure 11-26 shows how integrated contaminant loadings  (L )
changed along this route.  The aircraft soundings did not reach the top of
the polluted layer (shown to be about 2000 m msl in other soundings) at
Redlands,  and an arbitrary mixing height which encompassed the bulk of
the CO was chosen for the computations at this location.  Since only three
aircraft data points were available,  ground  level  data were also used in
preparing Figure 11-26.  Ground concentrations were assumed constant
throughout the prevailing mixing height in the area.

                       A considerable amount of scatter is  evident in the
ground data.  Much of this results from the complicated flow on this  day
in the  vicinity of passes.   In addition, the effects of local sources on the
loadings calculated from ground ddta are accentuated in  the eastern
basin,  due to the great depth of the surface  mixed layer  there.  The
general trend of the data,  however,  is  in agreement with the results
of the better-defined situation  on July 25, 7973.

                                 31

-------
                                                                       w  H

                                                                       P  P



                                                                       
                                                                       o  _r
                                                                       w  N
                                                                       j  &
                                                                           w
                                                                       U
                                                                          P
                                                                       W
                                                                       (M
                                                                       00
("*)
                     32

-------
                                                           P P
                                                           P r-
                                                           W "

                                                           *«
                                                           ti »
                                                           W £

                                                           o _:

                                                           w N
w
>


CO
N
 I
i—I
h—i


ti
                                                              P
                                                              w
                                                              OJ
aaniinv
               33

-------
o
0

































C
C
C






















.-.-'""








" ~ "
i • • -. v -j
o
0
o





















,---







J

j'u, |
" " " " s
C
C
«




















t~







^ r
..
N
* .• ""
*"* X *
>J f tj
r
) C
> C
» 1

C
o
•ft
rt
>

r-« C
W fc
c rt
3
O
In
0








•-
X


"

M
L-
-J- .


»
« ^
c
C
C
1



re H
UJ jr

< -*
•— o -
X
-£ (K
•^ UJ

2
a


•-»


*





xx*1*1
a
1 w
i- '






LI W ^

5^
3
•a







— &-



c
i


•n

"





w
X
«
-


-


„

o

EN



a.
d




X
:°

m
0


^
o



rO
O
-
CNJ
O
-

o

-

o


L>



E
CL
a.





J

O

in
^
o
*



0
rO
(M •
O
CM '
in -

O .

in -

O -


^



0




r

TEMPER

in
"
o
*
in
rO
0


m
CNJ "*
0 .
CM
in
o

in

o -

ft


X CO


_
v° E

o

^
1

1 J;
_1
ul
Cf.
o
o -
o
in "
o
03 '
o .


O

S -
o
0
ro '

3 -

2 -

0 -.


                                                                           u




                                                                           O  N

                                                                           o  ^


                                                                           0£{  N
                                                                          5 w
                                                                          E ^

                                                                          § H
                                                                             H

                                                                          <; M
                                                                          U co
                                                                          w
                                                                          >
                            34

-------
UJ O
^~ O
** ri
 c
 o
«-*
 id

I  E
W ^
•u r'1
 c:

 6
 >,
O
                                 : x  x z x c x
           *
                                         sru I.

                                          \ / \
                                           r\>  1
                                                         J"-
                                                             '   L"
                                                                                Jo Jo -*"  Jo  Jo
                                                                                              s •
                                                                                                              U  in
                                                                                                              
-------
     O
     O
            LNX
                                          WESTERN
                                           BASIN
                                             EASTERN
                                              BASIN
                                                                           ARED
     600
     500
     400
   I 300
   O
     ZOO
     100
             A

             O
   SURFACE  DATA

   AIRCRAFT DATA
LA APCO 0, DATA ADJUSTED

TO AGREE WITHARB CALIB-

RATION METHOD
            LNX
      1100      1200       1300       1400       1500       1600
                               Time (PDT) Along Trajectory
                                                       1700
1800
Fig.  II-26.   POLLUTANT LOADINGS IN  SURFACE  MIXED LAYER
              ALONG TRAJECTORY ARRIVING AT REDLANDS AT
              1730  PDT,  SEPTEMBER 21,  1972  (from aircraft
              measurements  plus estimates  made from ground data
              and mixing heights)
                                   36

-------
                       Figure 11-26  shows that the CO loading of the air
mass sampled in the afternoon sounding at Redlands increased as it passed
over the western basin,  from Long Beach to Brackett.  Quantitative
estimates of emissions based on the  magnitude of this increase are probably
unwarranted, as the data from the Long Beach sounding are somewhat noisy
and the mixing  layer structure in general  was  complicated and difficult to
define precisely.  Between Brackett  and Redlands  there was little apparent
increase in the CO loading, although the vertical distribution of CO con-
centrations changed.   At Brackett CO concentrations decreased markedly
with height in the first few hundred meters, indicating recent  emissions
at ground level.  This conclusion is  backed up by the high ground level
CO point at nearby Pomona (POMA).  By the time  the air mass had reached
Redlands,  CO concentrations in the first few hundred meters were virtually
constant, indicating a  much lower level of fresh emissions.  These observa-
tions indicate that, as would be expected from a comparison of the emissions
in Table II-1 with the trajectories in Fig.  11-20, most of the CO in the air
sampled at Redlands was emitted in the western basin.

                       Using CO as  a tracer for ozone precursors which
were not measured directly, as was  done  for July  25, 1973 we can deduce
that a large fraction of the ozone  precursors introduced into the air mass
sampled at Redlands were emitted in the western basin.

                       The ozone loading increased between Long Beach
and Brackett, and again  between Brackett and  Redlands.   The ozone concen-
tration over Redlands  was nearly uniform with respect to height, indicating
that the half-life of ozone  due to  scavenging by fresh emissions was  relatively
long. It appears likely,  on the basis of the foregoing analysis, that most
of the ozone measured at Redlands in the afternoon was produced in the
western basin,  or produced in the eastern basin from precursors emitted
in the western basin, again evidence of the transport of ozone or ozone
precursors from urban  centers to surrounding  areas.
                                   37

-------
      B.   Denver on November 21, 1973

           An example of the transport of ozone and/or its precursors
under conditions quite different from those in Los Angeles is provided by
the data from a study conducted in the Denver, Colorado area on
November 21, 1973 (Blumenthal  et al.,  1974).  The distance over which
the ozone and its precursors  and tracers were observed to travel in this
instance was small in comparison  to the two  Los Angeles cases just
discussed (due to the size of the observing network) but the path and
source  of the pollutants is quite clear.

           On the morning of November 21, 1973 an urban plume moved
north from metropolitan Denver confined to a surface layer about 90 m
(300 ft) deep.   Between 0830 and 0930 MST, aircraft soundings  at three
locations north and northwest of Denver measured the vertical distribution
of pollutants  in the plume.  After  another  hour of slow northward plume
movement over a suburban area,  all surface  winds and low-level winds
aloft shifted to easterly,  driving the plume westward toward a  rural lake,
one of the sites of the morning soundings.  A second aircraft  sounding
at the lake at  1130 MST confirms  that the polluted air had, indeed,  arrived
over the lake site with little change in its  primary pollutant burden, but
a 100 percent increase in O3 concentrations despite a three-fold increase
in the depth of the mixing layer.   At the same time, aircraft soundings at
the other two sites show roughly clean air values for all measured
pollutants.

           The data available for  November  21, 1973 in the Denver area
were basically the  same type of data acquired in the Los Angeles studies - -
vertical soundings of air  quality by aircraft,  hourly winds aloft observations
and hourly surface winds.  Fig. 11-27 shows the three locations where
aircraft soundings -were made at mid-morning and midday.  These sities
are numbered one through three.   Sites 1,4,  and 5 in Fig.  II-27a were
ballon-launching sites for hourly -winds aloft  observations from 0900 MST
on.  The observed -winds  at these  sites at  90  m (300 ft) were used to
construct the trajectory shown except for  the portion from 1030 to 1130
MST.  That portion was constructed from the constant wind direction and
the average speed from the surface to 270m (900 ft).  Prior to 0830 MST,
only surface  winds were observed, and they proved to be light  and variable
with a slight tendency toward weak southerly.

           In  support of  the calculated air trajectories, the Denver urban
plume  can be traced with NO  , which is formed almost exclusively by
combustion sources such as motor vehicles,  power plants,  and heating
units.   The six aircraft  soundings are shown in Figs.  11-28, 29,  and 30.
Figures II-27b and c show NO and O3 concentrations integrated through
the mixed layer for these soundings. On the  morning set of soundings,
                                  38

-------
        CONTOURS
        seooitiirrt
                                                          1mm
                                                       ,   *--J   I
                                                      iJl DENVER '-I
                                                      5^s~
                                                      SYAPLgTON  '
                                                     "1INT. AIRPOR
                                              ^J   F^
                    0827 MST
                    O| 0 mg/m
                    NOX ZO. 0 mg/m"
                              3
                   LAKE
       0915 MST
       Os  0 mg/m
                                         0925 MS
                                           0 mg/m2
                                         NOZ8.3 mg/ma
                   1194 MST
                   O, 16 mg/m2
                   NO, 31.9 mg/m»
                              3
                   LAKE
      1234 MST
      Oj 5. 1 mg/m*
Slt«
                                                Sit* I
                                          1242 MST
                                          03 5. lmg/m2
                                          NOX 5.9 mg/m8

                                               170
            M  V?"1
          /ROCKY 1!

          feTj'
                                            • SiU 4  -	
                                 I    /'DEmER _    t!STA°NRpORV
                                                    r-J
Fig. 11-27.  a. TRAJECTORY  FOR AIR ARRIVING AT  STANDLEY  LAKE
                1130 MST,  11/21/73
             b. MORNING MIXING LAYER POLLUTANT  DATA
             c. MIDDAY MIXING LAYER POLLUTANT DATA
                                    39

-------






































1
? 0
5 c

' w






































,
c
c
r*
«s






































t
C
> C
IT
J CS






































( ^v
-i-« if

-• -« • » o
> i
O
o
K
~"





~i
^






X


X




T X X

*

C •


/*
X






o
•J U
\>A





_l
O
•a
X
V
CO


t-
X
o

a:
RAMETC
^
£





C



*





"



e




-







z






c
2







•





-









-





.
O
c
in


M I



E
cx
a.


"s i



0



o





d



•

N
O
•

O


-


o -




J



i «


•>

1

g -

^>

0 .


% •


0 .
K>



O
CO '

O
tsj "
!£} -

o .


in -


o -








J ;

A>
i
L
t



? -

o
^
s -


s •


in
OJ "



o
CM


•0
o .

« -


o -


0




X 0)



>°>
O
>-
o
i
i •

ji
*j
£
O
O

o .
0)
g -


0 .


s -



s -

o .

o
K) "

0 .
e\j


o .


o -




X UJ '

_
:> '"
-. s f
rt C
P6 '
o 5


X
U i y
a.

^~

O



CO


^


10



10



ro

OJ


-


O




»



\
X


? Pi H
' H *§

1— i
M in
 
-------
                                 ,_   x mx
               r    Z|   Ck   Q.
               £    =>l   o   °-
              I O
               O
             3
             O

            O
• 10  O
O  O
D  _
X  o Z
i >  • O
                              o   m   o   o













Sc
c
- 0
•>  c
> c
> f
i f













> c
J C
u
J 0










N

2
5 <:
3 S







w
W h
w
M

M K X
XX t- •
,^Si r- t-

U I. *, C »-> ^.
> J
O
U c



X



W M
W

,^

w l. u
•> ^
D C
c
«J





M
W *
M U
K
X
X X
c
a J-

} C
> «.
r> ^
-



X X X X
-

M

K
K
X H
K r- r-

..
^
3 J
I B
O

*
0 ~
-
PO
o
•
d
-

o


o —
3
>
>
10
in
o _
10 H
IO
S -
m
O
CVJ "
« -

o .


o -

*
o
in
ro
S
in
CM
O .
CJ
tO
o .

o


o

o -
o .
o
CO "
g .
o
S -
o .
S •

o
CJ
o

0 -

                                                             H
                                                             
-------
                             ^-   I (O X 111






































1
5 0
2 S
1 CO






































1
o
0
?*•
Q,



























•










1
o
o
I/I
N


































N


K
\
C
O
if
CM




















XXX




M

U M
X
»»"
M X


"t-"

..-,r,K..
a c. a. a c. a.

> . -i > > .
C
C
—
r>

























-

X
K

U X

t- -


-/ >**"-N*/
nuc.c.0
j ~" 't ij t) o

0
o
0]
—
c
o
(T
 > >
C
C
?*•
v>

e I
z
,r,
r— '
oe
UJ
J
DC
X



X








X

X

X •
A
a
x M
*
« MW
f*
u V
Z 2
*
,

Nt<.u.










J























-






-
c
C


r
(X
»1




fc? <


to
o "





o




rt
o

-
C\J
o

.


0


-



o -



6
s




J


s -


m


0 .


s -

0 .
rO

CM
0
CM

U} -


O .


in -



O -



y



rr
4
r
1
^
S -



*J-

s -


s -

in


o .
CM

-

0 .


in


0 -







*l

>•
M
O
a
r o
^
<
Ul
QC
O
o -


o
o> -

g -


o .

o


o
m
O


O
to •


o
CM


O .



o -


^ -
"it *
'L~
" S


e
z
•^ " C
<-> j u
oc
\~
- 1



OT

CO


N

«?


in

•(T

fO


CM


-.



0



:
\
i.




N
J H
CO
¥t S
. °^
CM o^
H o
P .

f-t on
W g;
00
0 w «
> N
O oJ
w W

-------
                                       »_   X GO X Ul






























> 0
8
1 N






























O
O
M





























1
i
 » *"*
i
s















X


M
t) W
M





"*^_f_'--
^^

"???*s

> o
> o
i 2
c
o
rt
—
W
*O
3
O
0



-





x x at x


M
M
M
M


X
r- *• t-
X
-w~-~^

,'r % i«
>»»>">
C
C
P-
CO

P =
C 3
0
r-
LTl
K
IU
H
u
X
<
(C
£







C X X X





M

XX
K
•- f- »•

^^w~
Q
*,S-±S
> > > >






c
2


-|


•




-


-



-





_
C
c
«]


1
0.


"o i


6 '
.

o




o
-

N
O

-

o


.


o -



1


D
J


O
in '
5 -

O ,

m
10 '

0
rO
in
CJ "

O

>o .

O .


lO -


0 -



5

U
C
«s
r
L
hi

m
O

s -

o
fO

m
CM "
o .
CJ

in

o .

in


0 -


»n



O
>
H
5
I
3
I o
5!^
§
u
K
O
o •
§ -

O .
OD

O .


o .
o .
in

o .

o
10 -

o .
CJ


o ,


o -


^ _
""o"
"E~E
v o

B
z

to

•*•

10

OJ


__


o



E
a.
EX


)
0 f^
00
ti
o H
Q
H
rt
6 >
O
CO
HH
>.
6 O
s
^
o [H
Pi
>
.
CJ ' ^
6 0
CNJ
1— 1
1— 1
W>
• F^

O

aoniuiw
            43

-------


C
C
4-J
«
>
(U
W
f^j

C
3
O
^-t
O































.



























1



























1
























N

Z
1





*


X X
X X K








H


H*"~k^
• 3

M
1st- •• •*.!•«-»*
X
X-T. x-tr-yt
• K . \ ,








B X XX
X X •




-



u" t-
««>•
h •- x
"" >- r-
'

K
N»-N-»*N^ »«
T*' *i
a IB • i
i D) n
:_*-T -n<3-x. ;
> > f > > :



X




EXXXX*






" k"
"-X
MX W
m
t f


.
""
** 1
.1
M ^K
'"'^v
• 5" ow
ci
CD
31
£
H
SZ
3
O
o

r—
*-*
id
t-
w
2
<
CC
£

"













i*
i
i
•






u


*
-







^



t



.

It

u





4

ZN 0 H X <»XIU >

1 1 r *id I
~ 0 U

>-
M r T
u 5 W
5 5 S VJ
h. D _ X M ^ r ,
»„ 0 J X °Z Uj £ «E C"1
Z00ui "J°g "> 1 W
"pi i-l -5!
* 5 * PH ^
* w£
•










"


.




.







>>*\>>T i
§O O O 0 Q 0
o o o o o o
- O> f~ trt rO —  N
O Pi
M
V) W
wjQ
1 >
t— 1 'H
u> f-l M
6 h r
0 0
^ §
fin Z
J^
^°
5 ^^
r~H
t! w
Pi L_(
'^ r™t
££
CM ' •
6 n)
o
PO

i
I-H
1— 1

be
rH
0 fa
8
m
44

-------
                                    >_  X OJX I
































J
? o
S o
01
t CM
































1
c
;c
r.
0.
































i
C
c
IT
<\



























N


>7
f-t

Cc
if
C.
























i* W
W tM
X
M-
1
a*
H-tr+rn. i \
**' 1
»
» a /
X X-* •
u u u u
> > » > > *!
8
_
C




















_«•

M
U
*
".
•""I
'M
, 1
<"'','
>fv* M/
*A_ /
^ VW u


L* U
». •i'>>
50
o
Ol
j —
c
o
a
>
^
W_,
C
•oc
c f
13 *~
o
v<
O








xx-1'"





tM
M
**£w
S'""-'
• •
VN „„
"»-»-•-•
u
, u u u u
> u

>
^»V»

C
C
N

to

k-
i
- ^>
3
>


ac
UJ
Ul
a
ac
s.





















* 1 1











C



-


_


.






-






_
c
c
tf



g
a.
ex




* -> <
:° '



in
o -

-

->



o
m "

m
^i
° H





_
N? E
5~ »
g

^_

o
•5 _
X o
> -°
H
<
W
K
O
o -

o _

Vj
< H
M ^ r/*i
i T (J''
o ^ 5
SH ^
t^1
Win
ro
[ [ p^
q Q «
"" 17
^H »
~
o &
r_T
w«
3s
= p
K !7
ft ^
J 2
<°
r -\ - — ^
y ^
° E-1 W
Pi S
ga
•
ci
~ ^
6 S
i
a
•
bC
•i-t
(2
r^n
o



) aorumv
           45

-------
all three sites showed modest NO  totals (see Fig.  II-27b).  O3 values
in the lowest 90 meters (300 feet) or so are all below the background
count of 4 pphm found at higher levels.  (Integrations for ozone (L ) have
been corrected for a background level of 4 pphm.  Negative values of
the  integral are listed in Fig. 11-27 as zero).

            At midday, when the trajectory shows that the surface layer
of air which had been just west of site 1 at 0930 MST should be over
Standley Lake,  the only spiral showing a heavy load of NO  is that over
site 3 at Standley  Lake.  The O3 and NO  concentrations at: both of the other
sites are nearly at background levels  despite the continued presence of a
slightly stable lapse  rate.

            Comparisons of the data for Site 1 at 0930 MST and that for
Site 3 at  1130 show that the total NO  within the  surface layer has
remained essentially constant over the two hour track of about 16 km
(10 mi).  This indicates that there have been few new emissions en route.
In the absence of scavenging by fresh  emissions, O3 concentrations have
built up well above background levels,  due to continuing photochemical
reaction.

            There is little  doubt from the evidence  presented that the air
over rural Standley Lake at 1130 acquired its ozone precursors earlier
over Denver, even though the ozone itself did not form until after the air
passed site number 1 at 0930  MST. This is a very similar situation
to that observed over and downwind from Los Angeles.

            A. more detailed discussion of the aging of the polluted air mass
en route to Standley Lake is given in the  paper  by Blumenthal et al. included
as Appendix B.
                                  46

-------
IIL   OZONE IN RURAL AREAS

      Ozone has frequently been observed in rural areas remote from the
nearest urban complex.  Several authors, such as Miller, McCutchan
and Milligan(1972), Edinger at al., (1972) and Miller and Ahrens (1970)
have tried, with varying degrees of success,  to relate the ozone to  some
urban source.  Such a relationship is supported by the foregoing demonstration
that ozone and/or its precursors can be transported relatively long
distances. Several cases of rural ozone of apparent urban origin have
also been noted in recent MRI studies.   The following  sections are devoted
to two of these cases.

      The studies discussed here  consisted of special  aircraft pollution
observations made  over remote mountain and desert locations,  together
with observations in the Riverside-San Bernardino air basin on two August
days in 1973.  Of particular significance were the measurements made
over Lake Arrowhead and Hesperia (Fig. III-l).  Lake Arrowhead is a
mountain resort 21 km northeast of San Bernardino at 1560 m (5110 ft)
msl.  It is surrounded by national forest for 16 km (10 mi) or more in all
directions and is about 1 km above the valley to the west.  There is little
or no industry and little traffic in the area.  A single secondary road encircles
the lake and a second road passes the lake about 2  km to the south.  Hesperia
is located in the desert about 30 km north of San Bernardino at an elevation
of 1035 m msl on the north slope of the mountain ridge which  includes Lake
Arrowhead.

     The aircraft  sampling spirals on the two days of interest were conducted
over a small airport north of the lake (ARR),  at Hesperia (HES), and in the
eastern portion of the  LA basin.  Winds were observed every two hours at
Strawberry Mountain Lookout southwest of the lake, and the Air Pollution
Research Center of the University of California at Riverside  made hourly
observations of wind,  temperature,  and oxidant at the Skyforest Ranger
Station along the  highway south of Lake Arrowhead.

     A.    August  16, 1973,  Arrowhead and Hesperia

           August  16, 1973 was a day of moderate smog in the Riverside-
San Bernardino air basin, with ozone values in excess of 30 pphm observed
by aircraft.   The day began with surface oxidant concentrations at Skyforest
near background  levels (Fig. III-2), indicating an absence of local pollution
sources.  Surface winds at both Skyforest and Strawberrry Mountain were
northerly all night,  bringing in air from the forest, mountains, and desert
to the north of Lake Arrowhead.  Fig. HI-3 shows  the morning  sounding made
at 0939 PDT over Lake Arrowhead.  This sounding shows clean air  with nitro-
gen oxides,  ozone,  and t>scat at or near background.
                                  47

-------
                                                             w
                                                             <;
                                                             w
                                                             pi
                                                             <:
                                                             o
                                                             z
                                                             n
                                                             Q
                                                             Q
                                                             £
                                                             <
                                                             Z
                                                             i—i
                                                             CO
                                                             
-------
                                                                 en


                                                        (M
                                                          .§
                                                          H
                                                        t-
                                                        o
                                                        in
                                                        o
                                               H PH
                                               U H
                                               2 0
                                               O 2
                                               u <;
                                               «:
                                               Q
                                               d
                                               X
                                               O
                                               
-------
                                                                                      ZIM  O
                                                                                                       X  COX 1
                                                   c
                                                   o
                                                   • r-l
                                                   •u
                                                   nt

                                                   v


                                                   W g


                                                   "
                                                   o

                                                                       •-    6    e
                                                                       *    o-    S-
                                                                       3    o.    o.
                                                                                                  u

                                                                                        00
                                                                            1    5*°    9

                                                                           *    5      £
                                                                                                                Pi
                                                                                                                Pi
g
o
o
o>
O
O
r--
cvi
O
O
o
o
K)
CM
O
O
O

O
                                                                  *>   -o
                                                                  6  HO
                                                                                        o  -i
                                                                                             O  .
                                                                                             o  .
                                                                                                  o  .
                                                                                                  o  .
                                                                       §  -1=
                                                                                                           _o
                                                                                                        o  .
                                                                                                       s  -
                                                                                                       o  .
                                                                                             M  "*
                                                                                                       o  J
                                                                                                            
-------
           By the time the afternoon Lake Arrowhead sounding was made
at 1645 PDT,  conditions had changed considerably with ozone and bscat show-
ing moderately high values in the lower 300 m (900 ft) for such a remote,
rural area.  This sounding is given in Fig. III-4, where two features are
of special interest.  First, the increase in ozone and bgcat  are confined to
the layer below 1900 m (6300 ft) msl, and second,  the ozone and bgcat are
well correlated in this layer while the condensation nuclei count is  quite
low.  The low ozone level  at the top of the sounding (above 6300 ft)  suggests
that the ozone did not descend from  higher altitudes.  Furthermore, the
high correlation between bscat and ozone and the absence of condensation
nuclei within the pollution  layer indicate a well-aged polluted air  mass,
devoid of fresh emissions. While the aircraft at Lake Arrowhead was measuring
ozone concentrations of 0.  10 - 0.  13 ppm,  the Skyforest Ranger Station was
recording a one-hour average  oxidant concentration of 0. 40 ppm.  The difference
in these concentrations is  attributed primarily to the  fact that the Ranger Station
was situated just below the crest  of  the mountains  bordering the Riverside-
San Bernardino Air  Basin,  several  miles upwind of Lake Arrowhead airport.

           The above observations  strongly suggest that the ozone  is ground-
based and that the ozone precursors were not of local origin.  The  surface
winds at Skyforest ranged  from 8  to 13  km/hr (5 to 7  mph) and those at
Strawberry Mountain about 11  to 22  km/hr (6 to  12 mph) for the 7-hour period
between the two soundings. Under these conditions, the aged pollution would
have  entered the  atmosphere somewhere upwind of the forest, which the air
traverses in less than two  hours.

           A  similar sequence of events is shown  in Figs.  IEI-5 and III-6
which represent soundings made at  0904 PDT and 1656 PDT at Hesperia.
Figure III-5 shows relatively clean  air  at all levels on the morning  sounding
while Fig.  III-6 indicates that  ozone and b     values  have increased substantially
in the lowest 460 m  (1500 ft) by the  late afternoon.   Again,  the ozone and b
profiles are well correlated while the lack of condensation nuclei indicates
aged pollution.

           The streamline pattern for  1600 PDT is shown in Fig. III-7.  The
San Bernardino winds aloft in Fig. III-7 show that  air over Lake Arrowhead
and Hesperia has a previous trajectory over San Bernardino or Rialto.  Fig.
III-7  shows one streamline passing  through Cajon Pass (from RIA to HES)
which represents a typical exit route for air leaving the Los Angeles Basin.
The figure also shows clearly the wind  flow pattern up the heated slopes east
of Cajon Pass (near  SBD and RED) which is characteristic of the mountain slopes
along the north and east portions of  the basin during the afternoon.   With the
observed wind velocities of 10  to 20 km/hr (see pibal  summary,  Table III-l),  air
                                   51

-------


c
o
rt
- s
Uo
T3 ^D
C m
3 -i
O
^-«
0


J
o
a
>•
to

z
5 H
3 1
o
a.
a
UJ OC
o u
^ ^
ut
3
DC
S.






»







ZM 0 t- X


6 6 o vp
1 a ? ^

>
K
0
a
Ox- ° 5
So o „,
^ >
i- <
                                                        Pi
                                                        P
                                          o J
                                          9 J
                                          no HO
                                             19 J
                                          9  4
                                          s 4
                                               2 4
                                                        W
                                                        ffi


                                                        O
                                                        S-
                                                        Pi o
                                                        H ID
                                                         M)
o
o

-------
MOO
3000
(400
tooo
 MOO
 too
 too
             to    a
            -i	iJr
                       20    25
                                           40    43
                                          -Si
                 -*r
                                                           GROUND LEVEL
                                                          (Elevation 1035 m)
                                                     50
    NO,
    Oi       ***

    co      n»

  TKU'CftATVftf    *C

NCIATIVK HUMMTT   %
                                                           I....I     IO-V-'   «
                                                            CN     e«r».l04  X
                                                         1VMULUCI   tlPnttf1  t
    Fig.  Ill-5.   VERTICAL PROFILE OVER HESPERIA
                    (HES)  AUGUST  16,  1973,  0904 PDT
                                   53

-------
  2600
  I«OO
5
w
§ 1600
5
  MOO


  1200
   •00
   too
  AGED  POLLUTION
                                                            GROUND LEVEL
                                                          (Elevation 1035 m)
                                                            NO,
                                                             O,"
     A	*-
     -v-
                                                      JJQ MELATIVf HUMOITT   %
     4	h
  CM
ItMULMCI
                                                                   em-» . 10'  X
                                                                   UI>/>MCJ  E
      Fig.  Ill-6.   VERTICAL PROFILE OVER HESPERIA
                     (HES) AUGUST  16,  1973,  1656 PDT
                                     54

-------

                                            o
                                            o
                                            0)
                                                           oo

                                                            C
                                                            O

                                                           H
                                                           Q
                                                           PH
                                                           o
                                                           o
                                                           xD
                                                           O
                                                           h
                                                           w
                                                           W
                                                           2
                                                           i—i
                                                           •4
                                                           S
                                                           <
                                                           W
                                                            GO
55

-------
                       TABLE III-l

                AUGUST 16, 1973 PIBAL DATA
Height  WD  WS(km/hr)
LAX -
Sfc
1000
2000
3000
4000
6000
7000
8000
1230 PDT
250
220
250
225
290
320
320
0

18
13
7
4
11
15
7
0
 SBD - 1320 PDT

 2000     230
 3000     255
 4000     225
 5000     200
 6000     190
 7000     225
 8000     220
 9000     230
SBD -
Sfc
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
1615 PDT
240
210
255
210
180
200
215
220
225
260
13
 9
 7
 9
11
17
22
11
                    9
                   18
                    9
                    7
                   17
                   22
                   30
                   24
                   28
                   15
                          Height  WD   WS(km/hr)

                          EMT - 1332 PDT
Sfc
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
11,000
230
225
290
240
280
315
295
265
245
245
200
215
17
18
9
7
17
15
7
7
9
13
7
15
EMT - 1520 PDT
Sfc
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
11,000
12,000
240
240
260
265
285
295
280
240
250
240
205
235
230
17
17
11
9
19
15
9
6
13
11
7
15
22
                              56

-------
arriving at Arrowhead or Hesperia around 1600 PDT should have
passed over the San Bernardino, Rialto area one to two hours previously.

           Figures III-8 and III-9 show vertical soundings made at Rialto
and Redlands at 1337 PDT and  1317 PDT, respectively.  The soundings
show a polluted layer of about 760 m depth (2500 ft) at both locations.
High values of  both ozone and bscat are observed in the layer which
indicate  the generally aged nature of the pollution.   Some evidence of
fresh emissions is shown by the moderate level of condensation
nuclei,  but there was insufficient NO production locally to reduce the
ozone values substantially.

           The foregoing data indicate that  the polluted layer observed
near Rialto and Redlands moved upslope to the Lake Arrowhead area
and through Cajon Pass to Hesperia by late afternoon,  bscaf and ozone
values are reduced in nearly a proportionate manner during this  travel
period due mainly to dilution with cleaner air.  At the same time, the
condensation nuclei, in both  cases, decreased markedly as the aging
process  of coagulation with larger aerosols  occurred.

           This  sequence of events  is  further supported by surface
oxidant measurements which show a peak value at San Bernardino at
1500 PDT and a peak at Skyforest at 1700 PDT.  This difference in peak
times is most readily accounted for  by a  simple transport of an air
mass containing ozone or precursors from San Bernardino to Skyforest.

           The streamline pattern shown in Fig.  HI-7 was established
about 1000 PDT and continued through 1900 with little change in
directional characteristics.  As indicated in an earlier chapter, the
most probable  source of the  air contributing to the 1500 PDT peak at
San Bernardino is the central Los Angeles area from which the air
parcels,  stagnating in the  early morning hours, begin to move  at about
1000 PDT along the indicated streamlines into the Rialto-San Bernardino
area.

      B.    Lake Arrowhead  on August 24, 1973

           Conditions on August 24   were similar  to those on the 16th.
Figure III-10 shows the hourly oxidant  concentrations recorded at the
Skyforest Ranger Station.  Figures III-11 and III-12 show the morning
sounding in clean air over Lake Arrowhead and an afternoon sounding
with high ozone and bscaj. levels in the  lowest 500 m.  The surface
winds at Strawberry Mountain,  San Bernardino, and Riverside were
southwesterly at 11 to 40 km/hr all day and  winds aloft at San
Bernardino and Banning were south to west at almost all levels and
all four observational times  (see Table III-2).   Surface winds at
Skyforest were not measured.

                               57

-------
                                            I-   X BXU
                                                             o
                                                             H
                                                             o£
                                                             H ^
                                                            w
                                                            oo
                                                               O
(«*) aoniinv
                  58

-------
         5


         Q
         UJ
         o
         a
                             o
                             00
                             W
            "  S
            lit!
            I  3 Sg 3

            S  B-°|
                                             o _o
                                          I» 12 1—
                                       o .
                                          o .
o
g
o
8
8     8
<0     
-------
                                                                      (M
                                                                      in  H
                                                                      ^  Q
                                                                          a
                                                                          H
                                                                      t-
                                                                      o
                                                                      m
                                                                      o
                                                                      oo
                                                                      o
m
         o
         CO
m
fM
                                       m
                                                                  Q
                                                                  w
                                                                  BJ
                                                                  D
                                                                  co
                                                                  *c|  O"^
                                                                  *  _,

                                                                  X~    *,

                                                                  O  N
                                                                  I—(


                                                                  <3  W


                                                                  H  ^


                                                                  H  <
                                                                                    8

                                                                                     H
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     
-------
                                                            ZN  O
                                                         V)
                                                                         X 03 X 111
                                                 a
                                                 o
                                                 •43
                                                 «J


                                                            g
                                                     <8
                                                        i  .   i
                                                        1  so S
                                                        S £ ° 3
                                                                      §
                                                                  o .
                                                                  o .
                                                                 O .
                                                                         n§  n9
                                                         o .
                                                         o> H
                                                                 §  J
                                                             o  .

                                                                 e -2  -
8
O
o
0>
(M
O
o
O
o
in
CJ
O
o
                                   
                                                                            "
                                                                         o .
                                                           jo  -Jo J°  -Jo Jo
o
o
                                                                          S  4
                                                                          o
                                                                          \r  ^
                          aoruinv
                                                                               Q
                                                                               <
                                                                               w
                                                                               K
                                                                               ^
                                                                               o
                                                                                       rt Q
                                                                                       w c^
                                                                                       O

                                                                                       bo
                                                                                       •H
                                     61

-------
o
vO
flj

—
w
o
UJ
t-
3
                     N  0
                         9 .
                                §  1
                               •8  •
                                8 •
                           .o
                         2 •»  -S -
                                2 •
                   Jo -lo J?  Jo Jo
                     S  -<•
                            8  -8 -
                                  fa
                                  ffi
                                  <<

                                  ei  p
                                  W  PL,

                                  O  °

                                  W  2

                                            H£
                                            W
                                               O

-------
                           TABLE, in-2
                 AUGUST 24,  1973 PIBAL DATA
Height  WD   WS(km/hr
Height  WD   WS(km/hr
BAN - 1000 PDT
EMT - 1332 PDT
Sfc
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1000
BAN -
Sfc
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
LAX -
Sfc
1000
2000
3000
4000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
280
270
250
220
170
180
210
240
250
1200 PDT
280
250
250
210
160
190
200
210
220
1230 PDT
260
250
85
110
75
105
120
235
280
265
22
41
17
15
13
15
26
24
22

24
30
31
28
17
13
20
26
24

17
9
7
7
7
9
7
9
18
13
Sfc
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
11,000
SBD -
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
BAN -
Sfc
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10,000
250
235
230
195
115
105
90
110
235
245
245
245
1345 PDT
245
235
230
160
145
155
190
1400 PDT
270
260
270
250
200
240
230
230
220
11
15
7
6
9
17
17
11
9
9
18
9

15
20
7
11
17
24
26

22
39
30
30
33
15
26
32
33
                              63

-------
  TABLE III-2
  AUGUST 24, 1973 PIBAL DATA (Continued)
  Height  WD   WD(km/hr

  BAN - 1600 PDT
  Sfc
  3000    250        31
  4000    260        46
  5000    260        31
  6000    260        22
  7000    220         9
  8000    240        22
  9000    230        26
10,000    220        31
                                64

-------
            A similar sounding pattern is shown in Figs. Ill-1 3 and
III-14 •which give morning and afternoon soundings at Hesperia.  The
primary difference between the data for August 16 and 24 is the
occurrence of moderate values of condensation nuclei at both Lake
Arrowhead and Hesperia during the late afternoon.

            The streamline pattern for 1600 PDT on August 24  is shown
in Fig.  Ill-15.   The pattern is  essentially the same as shown in Fig.
Ill-7 for August 16.  Flow through Cajon Pass toward Hesperia and up
the heated slopes toward Lake  Arrowhead is clearly indicated.   This
pattern was also established by 1000  PDT and continued with little
change until 1900 PDT.

            The flow pattern shown in Fig.  Ill-15, together with the
observed winds,  indicate that the air passing over Arrowhead and
Hesperia had a previous trajectory over the San Bernardino, Rialto,
and Upland (CAB) area about 1-2 hours earlier.  Figures III-1 6 and
III-17 show the aircraft soundings made at  CAB and Rialto  at 1208 and
1321 PDT, respectively.  CAB shows a well-mixed layer to 670 m
(2200 ft) above ground level while Rialto shows mixing to 1070 m
(3500 ft) above ground.   Subsequent soundings in these areas showed
even larger mixing depths  by late afternoon.  Both soundings show high
ozone, high bscat,  and moderate condensation nuclei characteristics
indicative of aged pollution, but with  some fresh emissions.

            Comparisons of the ozone and bscat values at Hesperia and
Arrowhead (Figs. Ill-12 to III-14) with the  earlier soundings at Upland
and Rialto (Figs. III-16, III-17) indicate slightly reduced values at
Hesperia and Arrowhead.  Again, the ozone and bscat values tend to be
proportionately similar, although some reduction in ozone  values at
Arrowhead appears to have occurred (Fig.  Ill-1 2) relative  to the bscaj.
values.   It is suggested that the primary changes in ozone and bscat
values occurred as a result of dilution with cleaner air.

            The trajectory of the polluted air from near Rialto  to
Arrowhead is further supported by peak times of surface oxidant values.
On August 24, peak concentrations occurred at 1600 PDT at San
Bernardino and at 1800 PDT at Skyforest.  The relatively late time of
the peak occurrence at Skyforest argues rather strongly against any
local generation of the oxidant.

            As discussed earlier, the trajectories of the air at Upland
and Rialto can be traced back to the central Los Angeles area along  the
streamlines shown in Fig.  Ill- 15.  Air parcels arriving at  the peak
oxidant period in the San Bernardino  area are likely to have originated
                                65

-------
  $200


  3000


  2800


  2600


  2400


  2200


  2000


   1800

2
u
§  1600

1
   1400


   1200


   1000


   800


   800


   400


   200
   (Elevation 1035 m).
                                        0.3
                 10
                -t-
                      -4-
                                                   04
                                                    i
                                                               0.5
                                                         45
  ftUUMETC*

    NO,
    0»
    CO
                                  20

                                 "50-
                                                   eo
                                                         90
                                                              too
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
UHIT

ppm

ppm

 °C

 %
                                                               10
     CN
  TlMULENCI
                                                                             enr»
N
z
c

T

H
B
X
E
       Fig.  m-13.   VERTICAL PROFILE  OVER HESPERIA  (HES)
                         AUGUST 24,  1973,  0831 PDT
                                     66

-------
MOO
WOO
two
MOO
    p     I
MOO
MOO
tOOOH
 IBOO
 1600

 MOO
 IZOO
 1000
 •00
 4OO
 too
    £
X
                                                            POLLUTED  LAYER
                                                            GROUND LEVEL
                                                              (Elevation 1035 m)
             oi         o ft         as         a4
   0     5     10    IS    20   Vs    30  ,  IS    40   49    50
   •V  '  rO^   i    IO    15    Yo    21
   V"L""^WBO""   30    40 •  M    40    70    lib   GO100
   ft	1	1	1	i	4	1	*	1	$	fe
                              as    N0°,"      w-    5
                                     CO      KM.    C
              iS	&	&	4*9  "•«•««>.    «e    T
                                             %    -M
                                     CM    cnr^.lO4  X
     Fig. Ill- 14.  VERTICAL PROFILE OVER  HESPERIA
                      (HES)  AUGUST 24,   1973,  1546  PDT
                                    67

-------
                                             o
                                             o
                                         -n  ^
                                         w  £

                                         o  £
                                         "£.  2
                                         W W
                                                      oo
                                                      Q
                                                      P.
                                                      o
                                                      o
                                                      O
                                                      h
                                                      CO
                                                      W
w

H


in
 i
i—i
i—i
i—i

ab
68

-------
  5200
  3000
  2800
  2600
  2400
  2200
  2000
   1800
   1600
I
   MOO
  1200
  WOO
   •00
   600
   400
   200
                                                                    (Elevation 445 m)
                                                                            Unit  STMIOL
                                                                            ppm    N
                                                                                   z
                                                                            pom    C
                                                                             •C    T
                                                               RtLtTlVt HUHIWTY   %
                                                                    b~«      to-V1
                                                                    CM
                                                                           cm-1.104
•M
B
X
E
     Fig.  Ill-16.   VERTICAL  PROFILE OVER CABLE (CAB)
                      AUGUST 24,  1973,  1200  PDT
                                    69

-------
                                                                  o
                                                                  H
                                                                     O
                                                                  w


                                                                   •
                                                                  r-
                                                                  i—*
                                                                   i
                                                                     O
(IK)
                   70

-------
in the western Los Angeles basin during the  stagnant period prior to
onset of the flow pattern shown in Fig. II- 15.

            Data from both August 16 and 24 suggest strongly that ozone
or precursors originating in the metropolitan area moved eastward
through the Los Angeles Basin,  through Cajon Pass, and up the mountain
slopes. Evidence is shown of the arrival of these air parcels at Arrow-
head and Hesperia (about 90-100 km downwind of the central Los Angeles
area).
                               71

-------
IV.   OZONE ALOFT - MECHANISMS AND PERSISTENCE

      Previous chapters have shown the feasibility of the export of large
quantities of ozone from urban areas and the transport,  in a single day,
of ozone to rural areas.  This chapter shows that,  in the absence of
scavenging substances, ozone is stable for long periods  of time and
that multiday transport is possible.  One method of isolating ozone
from fresh emissions or  other scavengers  is to confine it to a  layer
aloft.  There has recently been much discussion of the source  of ozone
in layers aloft, and this chapter also presents several examples of
normal meteorological mechanisms for transporting ozone and other
pollutants from the surface to elevated layers.

      A.   Mechanisms for Trapping Pollutants in Layers Aloft

           Numerous mechanisms exist for creating well-defined layers
aloft that contain air  which was previously  in contact with the surface.
The examples presented here are divided into two categories:  (1)
creation of layers by undercutting  of air that was previously within the
surface mixing layer and (2) creation of layers by buoyant lifting  or
transport of  air from the surface.

           Examples of undercutting include the isolation of air aloft by
the formation of a radiation inversion below and the undercutting or
lifting of one air mass by another.   Figure IV-1 is a repeat of  a vertical
profile over  El Monte,  California on July 25, 1973 (previously Fig.  II-8).
In this figure, the sea breeze extends from the surface  to about 450 m
and has undercut the  air mass above.  The air  between 450 m and about
700 m msl was previously part of  the surface mixing layer,  but was isolated
from  the surface by the onset of the cooler marine air below.  On a much
larger scale, frontal systems act much like the sea breeze in Fig. IV-1
with one air  mass lifting  or undercutting another.  The  sea breeze in
effect is a miniature  cold front.

           Figure IV-2 is an early morning vertical profile over
Brackett Airport on July  26,  1973,  one day after the profile in Fig.  IV-1.
Several distinct layers are seen in this figure.   The layers between 450
m msl and the top of  the graph exist in a very stable atmosphere.  These
layers have been isolated from  the surface (and from surface emissions)
by the nocturnal radiation inversion, and the ozone aloft has probably
remained from the previous day.   The ozone below 450 m msl, however,
has been depleted  by  fresh emissions into the surface layer.

           The layer roughly between 520  and  730 m msl is an example
of a pollutant layer aloft created by buoyant lifting from  the surface.
The situation in this case is quite complicated.  This layer was just
                                 72

-------
g
a
c >;
ZN O »-
0 «°
•*4
^1
rt H
1 c 5 3
d] C 0 uj
*e °" j: g
3 ^ GO K
0 o u
l-i EC ^ h-
OU1 UJ w
Q « a
	 ^^_. 	 °-
1 1 o"

Ul
1
M — rj <
f~l ^* OC
go o 5
a
£
X (OXU


*]$(•
f-
5 _
i £
I 2Z y
gii0!
5 P
W
co'N
r- W
o w

- CQ
Lfl
^J *T
tH H
T ^/D
H ..-
1-1 h-1
hM
p7




1


__!-»•••
..---'""
^^-^"--'r'"


•*





• M^N'
" /***
w r«^«»-t«
^^^~ ,.-„*"•"•• - r
^^~ - » J
• " M
"«• - ".J ,"
^a...w-^«»^-vlt-~' /
""•:\ ."...,i--ri-'M^r"u<

§ 8 § 8
3 ¥ 8 o
•»«•«• ;C





iF
1 '
"U
u" "
-

J
r
•




-
M

X
/
V
w
u it u
, u

a
o
a>
f>*4«>M
. \
M
. \
r* "
'1
1 /

^
,

*
A

' *,
"'

c x xlr
rM-U\
n
M \
""\-|
n
u°
u
Ct U
u

§
(0
K-X-X
1 \

/\ I ' *
» \ /^
"


^
*" '*• *• »• *^


•A
"^^•V^'
.' - V

** X I X * X

M
*
J



u
u to u w w
w u
u

88°
* <«*
6 "


.

o


.

6

-
 .
ey

8 '




O .




O -


f*


o
Q '


8 -

s •


o
o
to '

8 •
o



S •
i

o .
 ^2
                                                 i
73

-------



























,-r^"










N

~J
**
XX X XX X
w
UW • 0 0
O U










*"»•••






X X
B.»
y
/ /*
«/*


xx *


• » o


5 8
o 
z

z
o
cc
u.
o
z
z

1
cc
H 0
11
-J >
_l UJ
O CC
0. Q.
Z
UJ O
y Z Q K CO g
Q. _j o °"
,
oo2 z

°OS ?
-"g^o
is£ fe
ago o
zli 5
^^s <
?UJ< Z
OQ. S 5
rjoiu u
COCO CC Q;









»-»-






X x x :

N

\'
M
\
1
^"""••^

B I
Z * •
."
u u
1



(










G 6L
x1 a
:xI[/-"°
/ ^
/ "
1 /
1 J

*-ft-f+-m
J

x
X X
UJ U O U
U UI X •
0 • W











!*"•
/ x> z
X XIX 1
/ 1
1 /*" »
* ... ^.
N-lrf^ ^





x* x
XXX

"O "'w
D 0 t 0
Ul • X X

X • X w
1
..-



B










K
X
X
J x
* x/
y X
a
•
N"*I"'S|S
A
N
\
\
*\
X O
x
X % 0

0."
• X
K Ul W W W
._ -J _
n



\
\
«



x
X *-
x


X
1
r

w
in
-x. *
X
3>.
°\VN


"o

.
0000
o o o o










cc
UJ
>-
<
-I
13
MIXIW30VJ


CO





/•.
/"

k

x r


»*

^
~
w






-N










**"*

x
x
x
•i
rxx

•1



3 X

X






u
r oo

"X,


O
o
*





c S
b ?
U1 (/>
o

c t
o ^
-M
?

r— (
w s
•? I:
n x
3 <
o 5


W
























































.
O
3





ZN „ H X OQXU1


"7 • cO 1-7
E E 0 v° e » J* r- 6
^ O ® ^^ lO ^fc. iTs. ^^

o0 E-i
£ NO* '-'
u 5 CM U
CC — bl j
3 Z O £^
^KIO 2 rjjzy ^[£1
go o £ u So ^ J £?
UL ^J Q CO r ' f i

H" ^ •"" "~~3 f~^
ui r~^
* ^ ~




-



-




,~





-







.
in
d ~

.

d

_

in
d
-


CM
d '


_


d '


-




o -
2 -i

m

0 .
*

m
ro "

O
10
CM "


O
CM ™


in -


0 _


m -




O -
* 1

o .

f> '

o .

CM "
CM "



2 "


o .


m -


O -




to .
o
o •

o .
en

o .
CO

o
N-

8 -
o .
m


O .
< z
woo
w o w
0 0 Z
tf ffi O
cJ
t~" '
^ u 4 ^ ^^
5 H S
U Q Q
1 ] fl^ ^^
rO E~* (^
w S ^
t> o CQ
CM
•
N
1
— 1— 1


• rH

o ^
9
aannriv
               74

-------
described as being isolated from the surface.  Actually,  the high b
                                                                s cat
and other pollutant readings are due to a point source plume with enough
buoyancy to penetrate the radiation inversion.  Since the atmosphere
is stable, the plume has reached an equilibrium height where it is no
longer buoyant and has  stabilized to form a layer.  The buoyant plume
was able to penetrate the inversion, but other emissions at ground level
were prevented by the inversion from mixing higher than about 450 m
msl.  Note that the ozone was also somewhat depleted by NO  emissions
in the plume.  In the presence of strong sunlight however, it is probably
possible under some circumstances to produce ozone photochemically
in an elevated point source  plume.

            Other examples of buoyancy mechanisms which can generate
layers aloft are:  urban heat islands which cause urban air to be warmer
(more  buoyant) than surrounding air and can generate elevated urban
plumes under certain conditions, convective cells which occur over
heated terrain and lift air from  the surface, and heated mountain slopes
which can cause localized heating and upslope flow.  Figure IV-3 is a
profile at Rialto, California, near the San Gabriel Mountains.   Two layers
are evident in the figure separated by a layer of relatively clear air.
The surface mixing layer is capped by a slight inversion topping at
about 1050 m msl; however, air near  the mountains is heated by contact
with the  slopes and flows upslope to an altitude at which it is at equil-
ibrium,  forming  a second layer.

      B.    Overnight Persistence of Ozone

            The ability  of ozone to survive in the absence of sunlight can
be demonstrated  by observation of the vertical distribution of O, at
various times through the night in a layer separated from surface
sources  by a stable layer.  The data for such a demonstration has been
provided by a 24-hour study of pollutants over  the San Bernardino-
Riverside air basin east of  Los Angeles on  July 26 and 27,  1973.   As
part of an observational program, aircraft soundings were made over
six locations at about 1700 and 2300 PDT on July 26 and about 0200 and
0500 PDT on July 27.

            The names  and  three letter identifiers of the six sampling
locations are listed in Table IV-1.   Their locations can be found in any
of the several foregoing figures showing maps  of Los Angeles  and
vicinity.  The results of the overnight observation of O_ are also
summarized in Table IV-1.  Ozone data were studied for an elevated
layer  free of surface influences.  The layer between 1000 and  1500 m
(3000  to  4500 ft) msl was selected so that all soundings would be
continuous to the top of the  layer,  and the bottom of the layer would be
above the surface inversion on all 24 soundings.  Averages of observed
                                 75

-------















... _




x

A


* **

• . *.
K
(
""w"





O
n *
t
LAYER CAUSEI
UPSLOPE FLO









•i
1
./•*.
/
J'"'
/ .
1. _---
*
X 1
X M •
* K
X * ** "

4> U

















(_ ^. *"

•A
\
t
X C Z X
\
1
*
KXX

M M
M*
"


, '




















**

1
\
\
J

- >
>


J •






^" — ~









•
J
J ^
~ 1
\L'
t x 2 x x
h
• *
a
MX



'2


•
* ** Y °




cc
UJ
_J
O
Z
SURFACE MIXI
!








.V """

K »
"a.".
w
..=»*•









- **






	 — »•








I-*'?"*"*
X

••".•
"
toX X X«
w









4





_1
U.
U.
o
z
c
g
























SJ
C1
^


.
•
b
7
(!























,
= J
T S

3
^ ^
J
-4
i
1 1
5 I






•
















,

a




c
2




•



.



-


.







.

? N <


1
a

" .

o _
t

v>
K>
O
10

n

NJ "

S -
0 .



« -



o •




?

z
i '
a
? -

o .

s -

0 .
10
s -

s •

in -

2 -
tf>



0 -



«o .
z ta


_
e
>
H
S
JJ
1
2 -

8 •

S -

o
*~
S -

2 •



° •
3 .



S -



o .
X U ^
o
+ ~\ * } 1
o ji f^ r
^TS *^\ , ~.
E ^fe IT]
"lft
B « J
z £ ^ W
o ^^ CQ
S H
o> ^- W
° §
* ^
S w
K^
*" 
^H

ti
«> r^
8888
2      «      
-------
                                  Table IV-1

                      Overnight Ozone Concentrations
                                        Times PDT
Location

Ontario
(ONT)

Rialto
(RIA)

Redlands
(RED)

Riverside
(RAL)

Corona
(COR)

Bracket
(BRA)
July 26
17 PDT
20.4

16.8
10.4
12.3 '

 9.7
20.7
  / A\
  {"4)
                   July 26
                   23 PDT
July 27
 2 PDT
July 27
5 PDT
               13-4
                4.8
                      n  si
                      (1'5)
               11.0
                o.i
                               10'6
                                0.2
                                      {4 5)
                                      ( ' '
                                                  0.1
Average
    The upper left hand number in each set is the average Oj concentration (pphxn)
between 1000 m and 1500 m.  The lower left hand number is the average Oj
concentration (pphm) in the first 200 m above ground.  The number in parentheses
is the temperature °C at 1000 m minus the average temperature in the first 200 m
above ground.
                                    77

-------
ozone were calculated for both this layer and  for first the 200 m above
the surface for all soundings.  The upper number in each group of
three in Table IV-1 is the mean O,,  concentration for the elevated layer
while the lower number is for the surface 200 m thick layer.  The
number in paretheses in each group is an indicator of stability of the
layer below about 1000 m  (3000 ft) msl.  The number is the difference
in temperature in degrees centigrade  between the 1000 m msl temperature
and the average temperature in the first 200 m above the  ground.

            There are many reactions known which can consume 03 in
the lower atmosphere.  By far the fastest of these is the following:

                       NO + O3 —>  NO2 +  O2.

The rate constant for this  reaction is  about 0. 3 pphm"^  min~*
(Johnston and Crosby,  1954), which means that, at a constant NO
concentration of 1 pphm,  the half-life of 03 for this reaction is  less
than 3 minutes.  In the absence of the solar radiation necessary to
produce 03,  NO from the fresh exhaust of combustion sources therefore
quickly scavenges 03 .  This is seen in Table IV-1  where 03 concen-
trations near the ground fall below the 4 pphm background value during
the night due to the continuous introduction of fresh emissions into  the
surface layer.

           As the temperature  differentials in Table IV-1 indicate, air
above about 1000 m is isolated from the surface layer throughout the
night  by a strong ground based temperature inversion that is established
at all locations between 1700 and 2300 PST.   Cut off from sources of NO,
03 at the upper levels appears to be quite stable, as shown by concen-
trations of 12-13 pphm - well above background - that persist through
the night.  In all 24 soundings studied, 03 and bscat were well correlated
between 1000 and  1500 m,  and condensation nuclei (CN)  counts at these
levels were low.   These conditions are typical of well-aged polluted air.

           Examples of the soundings from one location,  Riverside, are
given in Fig.  IV-4 to IV-7.  The high ozone levels existing throughout
the night above the surface mixing layer are evident in these figures.
From these figures and Table IV-1 one can see that the ozone aloft is
quite  stable and that the concentrations do not decrease significantly
throughout the night,  indicating a half-life for  ozone in the atmosphere
of something greater than  12 hours.

           Thus,  the data show that ozone, once formed and in the
absence of other pollutants to scavenge it, is  stable in the atmosphere
at high concentrations for many hours, even in the absence of sunlight.
                                 78

-------

































1 1




















.-•"•^"








"WN~-
»
w £• u
1
> c
> c
r c



















•• +> *• '
""







/*•"•».
•M/ >
/
M
,»£¥•»•

"i "«
S *
C
O
33
I
E
•O
C
§
O












^^••-"









•"•""X*
* *S5*2i

u""1!"""'
} s



E
O
CO













•»*•»•*"







r

J
/
x * *
u tt a
*l MI

}
1
)



^














•- . »







•**
-

'
«•'


(
C
«

> »


1 i

1
I

>

o ,


"^ .
*


o .
t
s-
o .

o» "

o
CM


IT) -

o .



o -




J J

If
c
>
i
tl
L
j


? -


o .



rt •
0 .
to
S

8 -

£ •


0 .

« -



0 -

C (0

1
i2^.
S
-

= 1
E *
5
e
S i


o ,
o*


8 •
o
r-
3 •

8 -

§ -


S •

o .

9 •

o -

X 111

r 1
3 JJ
ft


•* 2
£
h?
<]
o pi
w
p
 H
« ° ft
H oo
O .
Pi ro
^
1-4 ""*

•o y N
Pi 2
csi [^j tD
TiH
_ >l
i
i — i
0 •
M
• H
saniunv
            79

-------







** I



•s/*


*'. .
,v
i 1





*. t- »•

X


/
y*V

** "* k *
t! u T
" 0 ° K X »
IK
> |





_~~"*


*«*

N
V^,—
W
M 1
•
V> O U <
K XtX X K
1 i

•





X ***%

M
«S
~
«^1'"«

X M X
.."5,
t
1 I







X
• 1

"~^r\,
••
x"'
MM U

1 I






r*

• A

""•»'"',
« *
\ *
--8^
i.
? g
9 ^

-


K

K
X * X
X X
1


. •
.S" «
*•» *
M w X X W

0°
u u u
ON
; i
r «
-

•


-


•


•



| c
6 "
-
d
.

10
6 "
-

CM
6 "
-

d "

-
o -
>
o
to ™
?-
0 .
n "

o "
o
CM

O
CM
a -

g .


o -

? -
9 1
U? •
S •

m
CM "
S •

2 •
2 •

.0 -

0 -
f -

§ I
S •
s •
2 •

S •
S5 -

9 -
8-

5 -

s -
o .


                                                       CO
aafuirw
              80

-------

















„ f
•.»---

XXX
X

**"**'*
V

M 5
X X K
3 c

» <


















• """"•-•-••




r~

w
XX IX it
c
c
C


5*-
p x
Sz
z S
feV
zu.
81
|i
£3
zo








*"••"'


x x :

~*S-^"S
»
«»•«„-
* = • jr a
X »
L.
> c
> c
> c

















»»v





-^

• » «
a.
X
X
1
) C
) C
> a
._

c
0
td
«
S
"o
§
o









'••••*""""'

^xxx"

»
VA

»,=5'"

) C
> c
I ~
X
•
*
M
K
">,
w • •
W
>
>
>



C
u
2
C
** C
2
U
3
3
) en
>




-




.*
.x1

*
B.
K
U "
O U O

>
r



























C
C
A
i
sr
M

h
5


PAMAMETCR



















>
i

a






c
3








•



•

-



c



EN <


p
g


!*•> <
!o i


m
6

»


5 •



6 "

6 "


o —
»



j


E
S «


5
.


O
10
?'
?-
n
10 "
S -


S -
S -
a -
o .

« -
o -




••


\
>


J
C
U
L
31
t*


m
*
o
^-
S -
o .
10
in


S •
e -
o .
m -

o •
o




1C OQ


0~<
^* ^
s
>•
!j
5
d
K
o
2 -
§ -
2 -
3

S •


s -
§ -
3
3 .

Q .
O -



yf


«••
O
« '
w

Z
U


o

.
00


«


10
*
«
CM

•~
O



                                                                  H

                                                                  Q
                                                                 w
                                                                 H  BH


                                                                 n  P
                                                                 O  P.

                                                                 H  ro
                                                                 O
                                                                 y  £


                                                                 (T,   i
                                                                 M

                                                                 >  5
                                                                  Wl
3oniij.iv
                 81

-------
                 UJCK  2






















*"

X X X X

-^




i!>:"I-i

i i
























»xr i

y
fcl

K *"*
W '
U U U
1
I





















_„•--


«x"xx.

\ 	
M

»^t"2s«
**,
^-«-*«-«-»
Su M
x " x
" , 1
g
C





















*-
p-

X
X X
1
J
iv
* r
/ A
u . \
w.w'
• " 1
'
1


f



















,. _

J

X 1
» K
/



, .
"Z~\

c
c
a




UJ
2
a.
tu
o
ac
o

z
2









•
l\

•4
a

/I
te
X



t* o
w
** w

>
>
>
V.
a


















X

X

t5 j
• \
•

X
X
w


o
«.u
w
IN W
*w
J
«
fSoS*-
^^



















X X
X


.-• "'"~1
lc
M X M
*" X
W
*> u w •
U U i
U U '
»„»
1
? 1
B 4
1

c
o
'rt
> _
JS 6
W o
T> J5
C ™
g
O










B.«'



r.
1*
X W
It •>


u u


1
C
J
§
\ ^

I



w
5
1









•











i
>
>
i

a







c
X





•










•





—
c

in <


1



? «! C
'o i


6 "

-
6 "




m
6 •


-

6 "
6 "


.


o -
>

j


i ,



3
)


g -

S -
0 .


10 .
It
O
10 "


10
N "

O
CM "
C -
O .


in -


0 -





y '


l|
I
5
i
j

S i

? •
S •


o .
n
in
CJ "


S •

in -
o .
u> •


o •


^ -


X CD


£^
9

£

S
5 s
" A
;
u
e
i •

8 •
g -


3
**
S -


8 -

S -
a •


2 -


o .


X U

• -^
lc
u g


J ^
u S J
pi
• — •
2 H
Q
n
« Pi
w
hH
co K
pi
H LH
**>• ^\
O n
W o
«° Jg
pfi c^
o .
10 pcj ro
n r-
r^H ^N
S N"
W^
> tj
N
7

«. *"^
I-H
bi)
P*"!

(»>) aannnv
                     82

-------
      C.    Ozone Persistence in Rain

           Figures IV-8 and IV-9 show profiles made over Shepherd
Airport (SHE) in the Los Angeles area.  These traverses were made
on a fairly clear, rainy day during which photochemical processes
should have been minimal.  In the absence of photochemistry, the ozone
is destroyed by the primary pollutants and the depth to  which the polluted
air has mixed during the day is indicated by the depth of the  ozone deficit.
The morning sounding  indicates a mixing depth of about 300 m msl while,
by afternoon, the fresh pollutants had mixed up  to 1000 m.  Note that in
Fig. IV-8 in the quite clean air at 1600 m, the ozone level is  between 0.03
and 0. 04 ppm (approximately background level)  even in the rain.

           Even though ozone is quite reactive,  the above data show
that,  in the absence of other reactants, it is stable and will remain in
the atmosphere a long  time.  This would be in agreement with Junge
(1963) who has mentioned that the residence time of ozone in the tropo-
sphere should be on the order of one to two months.
                                   83

-------
two
t«OO
KOO
tooo
1800
I tOO
1200
1000
 «00
 400
 too
                                                        Ground Elevation
                                                              66 m
                                                       MIXED LAYER WITH OZONE
                                                       DEFICIT DUE TO FRESH
                                                       EMISSIONS
                                                           MI1Q   f
   4	h
                                                     10
j RfL4Tivi HUWMTT   %
     b...t     PO-Sr'
           *nr».
C

T


N
B
x
I
     Fig.  IV-8.   VERTICAL PROFILE  OVER SHEPHERD
                     (SHE) IN THE RAIN, OCTOBER 18,  1972,
                     1020 PDT
                                   84

-------
MOO
»000
MOO
MOO
1200
SOOO
I«OO
MOO
uoo
K>00
 MO
 «00
                                           L
 Ground Elevation
       66 m
MIXED LAYER WITH OZONE
DEFICIT DUE TO FRESH
EMISSIONS

»o'z

•'
1
0
"
b__
	


\







E

Oi


lo

I I
B^B

0.2
19 20 25
15 20
36 40 50
4 a



o.i 0.4
30 35 40
25 30 95
CO TO tO
« r •




o.s
45 50
40 43
>0 KX>"
• 10
ftHAIHTIK
UH1
•».
CO KM
KLATtvt HuMIWtT %
b«« 10-V
CM ein-^ilO'
lUttULtNCt Unt^*M«b
STUIQL
N
I
C
T
M
a
X
t
     Fig.  IV-9.  VERTICAL PROFILE OVER SHEPHERD
                   (SHE) IN THE RAIN, OCTOBER 18,  1972,
                   1357 PDT
                                85

-------
V.    ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL DOWNWIND EFFECTS

      The Los Angeles Air Basin is a natural area in which to study the
formation and meso-scale transport of ozone,  because of the frequency of
occurrence of high ozone concentrations and their extensive documentation.
The complicated topography surrounding the basin makes it less than ideal,
however, for the study of long-range transport.   For this purpose it is
instructive  to employ standard diffusion estimates to calculate the effects
that an ozone source the size of the Los Angeles urban region could have
downwind in flat terrain.   This chapter presents the results of such an
exercise.

      The calculations were based on a number of simplifying but con-
servative assumptions.  These are listed below.

      1.     Ozone concentrations can be maintained  for extended periods
            in the absence of scavengers such as NO.  On the basis of
            elevated layer observations  in the Los Angeles area, a life-
            time of at least 12 hours is indicated.

      2.     The polluted layer increases in depth by a factor of two during
            the  12-hour period.   This  factor was put in to be conservative.
            Typical  mixing layers  tend to be less than 1200 m deep.

      3.     The urban plume continues to diffuse according to standard
            diffusion laws with no effects of terrain.

      4.     No new emissions are  injected into the urban plume, and no
            new ozone is produced by photochemical reaction.

      The urban plume was assumed gaussian, and August 16, 1973  was
selected as  a representative day for the purpose of establishing  the plume
parameters.  Figure V-l shows  the afternoon aircraft sounding  for
Redlands on this day, taken at 1700 PDT.  An average ozone level of about
0. 35 ppm is indicated for the layer from the surface to a height  of 640 m
(2100 ft) above ground.  Surfa.ce  oxidant values indicate that the  crosswind
width of  the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area urban plume extended at least
from San Bernardino past Riverside (approximately  24 km or 15 miles).
Accordingly, a peak ozone concentration of 0. 35 ppm (0. 31 ppm above
background  levels) and a width of 24 km ( a = 5.6 km) were taken as the
initial conditions of  the plume.

      For the purposes of estimating downwind concentrations, it is
appropriate to assume a C stability category (Turner, 1969).  The wind
speed was assumed  constant at 5 m/s.  Under these  conditions,  a  o-
                                  86

-------


























.
\
•L
aix^


~ z
a


-"u.
X* »a
Xxx

i 1
























.-•"-""




.......
"%> "i
"v

c
3 i.
fi ™"
a M ut
E>
M
ta
•1 W
"•'« »5
X X
X X] X X
I i
c


























,~
f
!
x a


-


X*




5
•1





















NVX
1
J •


.«
•
•s.

X
H-
S"



x"*
X


(
\





















X.
\
.--'"'


*«•
""..
.*,.a.>
. x *»
/""•
^


at =r a =
= qx



,
5 i
i a





















,. ^. ™ •*
r" .-»
Nt • ' fv* \




x a M
T r » z - i
X !< X *
'w
MA
UJ



i "• ™" X ""
r I ~




5 <
> c
5 4





















-:"1" *"

*
^**

-
W Mi
*_* • X Z





Z'X =
2 X



L
? J
0 5
o
oo
•st*
ti
o
"rt
u

T3
fl
0

0


























I
5
r «

o
CD
a a
V
(O

5


K
UI
i §
flC
2


-









-






•






.
I
VI


M <•


1
0.




* —I f
0 C




n
6 '

-

<•
o

.


2 -
.

CM
0


5 •



-


o -
3


1 t


1 c




3

(


0
10

1O .

o .


10 •


o
10
o
CM "

O
CM
ur> .

O .



10 -


o •






J ;


u
K
9
4
k:
11
L
£
II


IO

o .

10 .


o .
IO


CJ "
s •



o .





o -


IO _



r CD


4
o
x
K
5
i
i «

5
u
K
O
9 "

8 -




o .


S -
s -

0

0
IO

o .
CM



g .


o .



x u

o"1*




z
Z UI
Jl

»2


o
W
 <1
CM


1
^
U)
r"*
o

aonnnv
         87

-------
(crosswind) value of 5. 6 km would occur at a distance of 95 km downwind
of an effective point source. At a distance of 200 km from. Redlands (295
km from the hypothetical source), the 
-------
VI.   CONCLUSIONS

1.    Analyses of observational data on two days in the Los Angeles
      Basin indicate that ozone and/or its precursors were transported
      from the metropolitan area approximately 100 km downwind to the
      eastern portion of the Basin.  The data indicate that most of the
      ozone and other pollutant burdens (above background level)  at the
      downwind locations in the  afternoon were  due to precursors
      emitted earlier in the day or even during  the previous night in
      the western basin upwind.  The meteorology of the basin is
      such that pollutants which accumulate during the night and morning
      hours over the western basin are transported eastward in a
      daily pulsing fashion.  The contribution to the ozone burden in
      the eastern basin due to the western basin appears to be sufficient
      to cause the ambient air standard (0.08 ppm) to be exceeded even
      in the absence of any local contributions.

2.    Observations of ozone in layers aloft both at night and in the rain
      indicate that ozone is stable in the absence of other substances  to
      scavenge it.  Ozone has been observed to remain  undiminished at
      high concentrations in layers aloft out of contact with the ground
      for periods in  excess of 12 hours, indicating a lifetime in the
      atmosphere of considerably greater than 12 hours.

3.    Ozone has been observed in rural areas at concentrations as high
      as 0.3  ppm with no possible local source.  Wind trajectories,
      vertical profiles of pollutants,  and surface pollutant data all
      indicate the source of the  ozone precursors to be urban areas,  in
      some cases as far away as 100 km.

4.    Using data  from a single (but typical) day in the Los Angeles air
      basin,  extrapolating  to flat terrain and using standard diffusion
      techniques, it has been shown that a source area like the central
      Los Angeles area could cause ozone concentrations to exceed the
      Federal standard of 0.08 ppm at locations as far away as 260 km.
      This  estimate  is believed  to be conservative.

5.    From the data presented,  it is believed that urban sources  can
      have  a substantial effect on ozone concentrations in downwind
      areas and that this effect can carry over more than one day.
                                 89

-------
VII.   REFERENCES

Blumenthal,  D. L. , et aL , 1974;  Three-dimensional pollutant gradient
      study - 1972-1973 program.   Final Report MRI 74 FR-1262 submitted
      to California Air Resources  Board,,

Blumenthal,  D. L. , J. A. Anderson, and G. J. Sem,  1974:  Characteri-
      zation  of Denver's Urban Plume Using an Instrumented Aircraft,,
      Paper  MRI 74 Pa-1173 presented to the 67th Annual Meeting of the
      Air Pollution Control Association,  Denver, June 9-13.

Blumenthal,  D. L. , et aL , 1973:  Three-dimensional pollutant gradient
      study - 1972  program.  Interim Report MRI 73 FR-1083  submitted
      to California Air Resources  Board.

California Air Resources Board,  1972:  State of California Implementation
      Plan for Achieving the Maintaining the National Ambient  Air Quality
      Standards.

Edinger,  J.  G. ,  M. H.  McCutchan,  et al. ,  J.  V.  Behar (1972):
      Penetration and Duration of Oxidant Air Pollution in the  South
      Coast Air Basin of California, Journal of the Air Pollution
      Control Association,  Vol. 22,  No.  11.

Johnston, H,  S. , and H. J. Crosby (1954):  J.  Chem.  Phys. ,  22_t
      689.

Junge,  C.  E. , 1963: Air Chemistry and Radioactivity.  Intern.
      Geophys. Ser. ,  Vol.  4,  New York, Academic Press,  49-58.

Kelly, J. J. , 1970: Atmospheric ozone investigation at Barrow,
      Alaska, during 1966-1967.  Rept. No. 2, Dept.  of Atmos. Sci. ,
      University of Washington, Sci. Rept.  to Office of Naval Research,
      NR 307-252.

Miller,  P. R. , M. H. McCutchan,  and H. P.  Milligan (1972):   Oxidant
      air pollution in the central valley,  Sierra Nevada Foothills,  and
      Mineral King Valley of California. Atmospheric Environment
      Pergamon Press, _6,  623-633.

Miller,  A., and D. Ahrens (1970):  Ozone within and  below the west
      coast temperature inversion. Tellus  XXII,  3.

Ripperton, L.  A.,  and J. B. Tommerdahl,  and J.  B.  B.  Worth,
      1974: Airborne  ozone measurement study.  Presented to the
      67th APCA annual meeting, Denver, June 9-13,  1974.
                                  90

-------
REFERENCES (Continued)

Roth, P. M. ,  et al. ,  1974: Mathematical modeling of photochemical
      air pollution--II.  A model and inventory of pollutant emissions.
      Atmos.  Environ.,  jj, 97-130.

Smith, T. B., D.  L.  Blumenthal, J. R.  Stinson, and V. A. Mirabella,
      1972:  Climatological wind survey for aerosol characterization
      program. Final Report No. MRI 72 FR-1000 prepared for North
      American Rockwell Science Center, Thousand Oaks,  California.
      P. O. 262-1366.

Turner,  D.  B. , 1969: Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates,
      U. S.  Department  of Health,  Education,  and Welfare, Public
      Health Service, Consumer Protection and Environmental Health
      Service.  PHS Publ.  No. 999-AP-26, 84pp.

Vaughan,  Leland M. , and Alexander R.  Stankunas, 1974: Field study
      of air pollution transport in the south coast air basin.  Technical
      Report No. 197. Final Report prepared for State of California
      Air Resources  Board by Metronics Associates,  Inc.   Contract
      No. ARE-658.

Vaughan,  Leland M. , and Alexander R.  Stankunas, 1973: Field study of
      air pollution  transport in the south coast air basin0 Technical
      Report No, 1860  Prepared for the State of California Air Resources
      Board by Metronics Associates, Inc.  Contract Nos. ARB-658 and
      ARB-2-349.
                                  91

-------
VIII.   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

      The primary data used in this study were obtained in experimental
programs performed by MRI and funded by the California Air Resources
Board (ARE) and by  the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  The
authors would like to thank the ARB for their interest in and
cooperation with this EPA-funded study and to compliment both
agencies on the degree of interagency cooperation shown throughout
the project.

      We would also like to thank Metronics  Inc. for their cooperation
in providing much of the upper air wind data used in the analysis.

      Other sources of data were:  Loren Crow, consultant; the National
Weather Service; the U.S. Forest Service; McDonnell Douglas Aircraft
Co.;  and the Los Angeles, Orange,  San Bernardino, and Riverside
County Air Pollution Control Districts.

      This report would not have been possible without the many hours
of effort put forth by the staff of MRI in collecting and analyzing data
and in helping prepare the report.  The authors greatly appreciate this
effort.

-------
       APPENDIX A

DATA FROM JULY 25, 1973
AND SEPTEMBER 21, 1972

-------

<;
^s
H
^*n
§£
"^
O (\J
^ ^
CJ ^
w cc;
> 0
 PH
o ^
rr i— i
t-M *^
0 Q
h W
0 g
1— • 1
H
CO
i— i
-i
i-l










01
-0 |
•^ r« ^
^ 6
•J-> 3
12 ° r^?

— i CO r— < in ro ^ (M-^moooooooo •— i CM •— i -* i— i " ro i— i i— i -— C\J O co r- i— i >— i o oo ro or^oro •— i[^-moOxr^'— i rO CO O fO OO CO ^f OO CM ro roinvOvO in • sO LO LO CO vO t^ IT} Tf CO [•"- CO m t^ r- ^0 co xo ro r~ to ^F v£> ^ % J »H rt 0) < ^ ffiQZO^ix Dcocq


-------



















CM
1
-**
 0
< h
>H ^O
rvi
iJ
v 1
g«
/-\ •
§ 0
ij-l t-t
2 ^
F-H
0 0
I—I 5r
H a
< BJ
H <
w Hi
P H
2 BJ
»—. n^
p m
92
fr t-^
PH *^
U Q
k H
o J5
u D
H
W
I-H
J









TO
-a S
0) ^
-U hfl
*H* , . VJ4,
w ^ c
3 § s
•1— I p
3 0 «
< ^ O
bO
i A;
w y
W) rt
c w wd
^ ^ c
•^ ^* ^.
g^ *>
J 0
O



!t! ^
O * &
en _^
* %°
p. rt _

rt
CJ
O
J
           CM
ro   ro
                     >— <   •— >    CM
                                          f\j
                                                     (M
   A-2

-------
  320O




  3000




  2600




  2600




  2400




  2200



  2000




   1800

I
u
§  1600

5


   1400




   1200




   woo




   aoo




   coo



   400




   200
     Ground Elevation
            480m'

     PARAMETER     UNIT   STM»OI
                                                                  05
0
-6
i
'
IO
i
5
IS
10
20
IS
25
20
30
25
35
30
40
35
45
40
50
45
       NO,
        Oi

        CO


     TEMPERATURE
                                                                  100 RELATIVE HUMIDITY
                                                                          D.C.I
                                                                          CM
                                                                       TInuuLEiiCE
10
  ppm


  °C


  %

crrr-»ilO4
N
Z

c

T


•H
 8
 X
 E
       Fig.  A-l.   VERTICAL SOUNDING  OVER REDLANDS  (RED)
                       JULY  25,   1973,  1805 PDT
                                           A-3

-------
                         ZN  O    I-    = «XUJ
                     (0
          c
          o
          rt
£1   i
I   O"
          w   E
          •g
          §
          >-
          o
     '«  o
                        X  »    O
in "
« .
O .
ro "
O
rO
cu •
o
s2 -
o .
in -
O -
*
O .
in
10
O
10
in
CJ "
O .
CM
m -
O .
m
O -
o -
s -
o
00
g.
o
(O •
o .
m
o .
0
ro "
O .
OJ
0 .
o .
                                     K
                                     ffi

                                     W
                                                          O
                                                          ffi
                                                          EH


                                                            EH
                                                          r\
                                                          O
                                                          CO
                                                          H
                                                          >
                                                          (M
                                                          tuo
A-4

-------
                             2
                             >•!
                             en
                                ZN  O  •-   X COX I
                       c
                       o
                       rt
£   g   P  v$]="=S
                      w  E
                       C
                       3
                       O
                       >H
                      O
:o o
= 2
So
    O  10   O
                                                        H
                                                        ffi
                                                        U5

                                                        Q
                                                        ti
                                                        W
                                                        ffi
                                                        ft
                                                        H
                                                       W
                                                          CM
                                                       8s
                                                       CO ON
                                                       Pi
                                                       W
                                                       >
                                                       ro
                                                       t
aoruinv
               A-5

-------
                  APPENDIX B

CHARACTERIZATION OF DENVER'S URBAN PLUME
      USING AN INSTRUMENTED AIRCRAFT

-------
                   Characterization of Denver's Urban
                      Plume Using an Instrumented
                                Aircraft
                                   by
                  D.  L. Bluraenthal and J. A. Anderson
                      Meteorology Research, Inc.
                           Altadena,  California

                                  and

                               G. J.  Sem
                         Thermo-Systems,  Inc.
                          St.  Paul, Minnesota
                           Paper No.  74-266
For presentation to the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
   Association,  Denver Convention Center, Denver,  Colorado, June
   9-13, 1974.
MRI 74 Pa-1173

-------
                             Abstract

                         Paper No. 74-266
      As part of an EPA coordinated air pollution study, an extensive
three-dimensional air pollution mapping program was carried out in
the Denver area during a 10-day period in mid-November, 1973.
An aircraft instrumented to continuously measure scattering coefficient,
condensation nuclei,  O3 , NO x , CO, SO3, and flight parameters was
used in the study.  The aircraft was also equipped •with instrumentation
to measure the size distribution of grab samples.

      The sampling pattern was designed to  study the characteristics
of the fresh pollutants in the morning drainage wind and those of aged
pollutants in the plume later in the day.  The urban plume was sampled
during inversion conditions when it was trapped in a shallow mixing
layer and also during periods of good mixing and ventilation.

      The plume  was found to be well defined and well mixed.  High
pollutant concentrations were observed aloft in power plant plumes
which were subsequently ventilated to the ground as the mixing layer
deepened.   Photochemical processes were found to be important,
and the ozone level in the plume was found to vary from 0. 00 to 0. 08 ppm.
The background level outside the plume was always measured at between
0. 03 and 0. 05 ppm.   The aerosol  size distribution was also found to
change character as the plume aged.

-------
Introduction




      Airborne measurements of gaseous and particulate pollutants as



well as meteorological parameters affecting the pollutants -were made with



MRI's Cessna 205.  The aircraft was flown during a ten-day portion of



a major field experiment sponsored by the Environmental Protection



Agency and undertaken in the Denver area during  November 1973.



Although a number of different agencies participated in the experiments,



the purpose of this paper is to present selected airborne measurements



and discuss these data in terms  of their contribution to the understanding



of urban plume produced by Denver, Colorado.





      A major emphasis of the experiment was to study the physical and



chemical characteristics of Denver's urban plume and the transport



processes that affect the plume.  In particular, the choice of both the



airborne sampling paths and ground site locations were  made to best



study the aging processes that take place  in the plume.





      Previously, Riehl and Herkhof1'2, Crow3,  and Riehl and Crow4



have reported meteorological factors that affect air quality in the Denver



area.  We are unaware of any previous airborne measurements  made on



the Denver plume.  Similar work, however,  has been done in other areas



such as St.  Louis5'6'7.





Description of the Program




      The MRI aircraft as described by Blumenthal and  Ensor8 has been



used extensively  to measure the  three-dimensional distribution of air



pollutants.  The  sampling instrumentation used in the aircraft for the



Denver study included fast  time  response  monitors for O3,  NOX, SO2,



CO, condensation  nuclei, scattering coefficient, temperature,  relative



humidity, turbulence, altitude, and position.  In addition, measurements



of the size distribution of grab samples were made by installing a TSI



Model 3030  electrical aerosol  size analyzer in the plane.  Liu et al.

-------
have described the use of such an instrument for the measurement of
submicron aerosol size distributions.  The size distributions were
obtained in the aircraft by rapidly filling a large plastic bag (about
60 liters) to obtain the grab sample and then immediately analyzing
the aerosol in the bag with the size analyzer.

      Blumenthal ° has described considerations for plume sampling as
being dependent on the specific objectives of the particular study.  One
of the dominant meteorological factors in the Denver area is the drainage
flow that normally exists during the morning hours.  This flow carries
the urban pollutant discharge northeast along the Platte river valley.
Thus to  optimize sampling, horizontal traverses and spirals were made
at the points shown on Figure  1.  Traverses at various altitudes were
made along the routes  marked I,  II, or III and  spirals were made at
Standley Lake, Henderson, and near the EPA trailer location.  Both the
Henderson and EPA spiral locations were chosen because of ground
measurements being made at these points and  their close proximity to the
expected plume centerline.  The  Standley Lake spiral was normally made
to obtain useful background data,  Unfortunately, sampling path II had
to be terminated at Interstate  SOS since flights over the Rocky Mountain
Arsenal were prohibited.
      Upper level -wind data were obtained at both Arvada and the EPA
trailer  using pilot balloons (pibals). These data,  as well as summaries
of surface wind data,  have been used in this paper  and are based on
information collected during the study  and reported by Crow11.  Other data
used in  this paper,  including portions of the gas and bscat data that were
 obtained at the EPA trailer and reported by  Durham,  et  al1 3, were
also used to support the conclusions arrived at in this paper.

-------
Experimental Results





      Aircraft sampling was performed a total of six days in November



1973.  Data from  two  of these days are presented here to illustrate



various urban plume phenomena.





                  November 20 -  Urban Plume Structure





      November 20 represents an excellent reference point to begin an



air pollution episode. A snowstorm invaded the Denver area in the after-



noon of the 19th and lasted until the early morning  hours of the 20th.



Surface winds for  the 20th were generally from the south throughout the



day, and thus the plume consisted  of fresh pollutants which aged as they



traveled northward.  The freshly cleaned air mass outside the plume and



the relatively constant net flow produced an almost ideal sampling



situation and a plume with a fairly simple structure.   Figure 2  indicates



the streamlines at 11:00 a.m. as  well  as an outline of the  urban plume



as determined by  horizontal traverses and photographs.





      Figure 3 shows a cross section of the plume  obtained at 6200 ft msl



along sampling route II (see Figure 1 )  from Highway  287 to Highway 805



at about 10:00 a.m.  A distinct increase inNOx, CO, and scattering



coefficient at approximately the 1. 5 mile  point indicates the western edge



of the urban plume.  A further increase in NO x ,  SO2, and scattering



coefficient and a slight decrease  in ozone at the 4.  5 mile point probably



indicate penetration of the bottom edge of the Cherokee power plant plume.



The decrease on O3  is due to scavenging  of ozone by freshly emitted NO.





       Figure 4 is a vertical profile taken near the  EPA trailer at 10:55,



 an hour after the  cross section in Figure 3.  The temperature profile



 indicates a slightly stable lapse rate with a weak inversion starting  at



 6400 ft msl  (about 1200 ft above ground).   Up to about 5800 ft msl,  the

-------
various pollutants are well mixed and occur in about the same concentra-


tions as were seen throughout the urban plume cross section shown in


Figure 2.  Between 5900 ft and  6600 ft msl, however,  the power plant


plume is superimposed on the urban plume in a distinct, well defined


layer, the power plant plume being confined by the weak inversion layer.



      Characteristics of the power plant plume include high levels  of


primary pollutants such as NOX, SOS, and participates and a very low


level of ozone due to scavenging by NO.  This type of layer aloft contain-


ing high concentrations of pollutants (in this case NO x > 0. 5 ppm) can


persist for long periods of time and can be transported many miles


before being ventilated to the ground when finally entrained by a deepen-


ing mixing layer.



      Above  the inversion at about 6700 ft msl, the pollutant levels  drop


off to virtually clean air values.  Note however that the ozone level is


approximately 0. 04 ppm.  This level has been observed in many areas


of North America in very clean air and often represents the ozone

                1 3
background level  .  In the urban plume below  the power plant plume, the


ozone level is considerably higher than the background level indicating


photochemical production of ozone.



      Figure 5 is a  vertical profile taken in the urban plume at Henderson


shortly before the one in Figure 4.   Since the power plant plume seen in


Figure  4 was not directly over  Henderson at this time, no indication of


it is seen in  the profile.  The temperature profile at Henderson indicates


a slightly stable lapse rate with a weak inversion beginning at 6200  ft msl,


about 200 ft lower than the one  at the EPA trailer.   The higher inversion


level at the EPA trailer may be an indication  of the urban heat island effect.



      The pollutant levels measured in the urban plume at Henderson are


similar to those presented earlier and indicate a plume which is well


mixed  both horizontally and vertically.  The plume at Henderson is fairly

-------
uniform in concentration up to a level of about 5900 ft where mixing is
impeded and concentrations start to drop off,  reaching  clean air values
near 6400 ft.
      Figure 6 is a vertical profile of the urban plume over the EPA
trailer at about 2:00 p.m.  The wind is  still from the south.   Due to
surface heating, the mixing layer has deepened,  yet pollutants are still
confined to  a layer about 2000 ft thick.  The power plant plume is no
longer well defined on this  or other afternoon traverses and has evidently
been entrained in the surface  mixing layer.   Integration throughout the
mixing layer shows  that the total pollutant budget is  clearly higher than
during the morning flight reflecting the  entrainment of the power plant
plume and the overall accumulation of pollutants during the day.  It is
interesting  to note that photochemical processes are  active,  even at
temperatures of 0°C and that the ozone  level in  the mixing layer is
approximately equal to the  ambient air  standard of 0.08 ppm.
      The data from November 20  verify several statements made by
Riehl and Herkhof 2.  In a discussion of turbulent transport,  they surmise
that "during daytime,  the polluted  layer must extend well above  100 m
with characteristics almost those of a mixed layer. " Figures 4,5,  and
6 indicate that,at least on November 20, the polluted layer was well mixed
during the day and extended up to about  900 ft (or 300 m) in the morning and
to  2000 ft (or 650 m) by midafternoon.   Similar characteristics were also
observed on other days.  In addition,  they conclude that "non-persistence
of a temperature inversion through the  noon hours is not a good  guide for
current and subsequent air pollution levels. "  Figures 5 and 6 indicate
the problem associated with using  the inversion level to predict  the depth
of the mixed layer and  thus to some extent the surface concentrations.
Using the inversion level in Figure 5 as a guide to mixing depth would
lead to an assumed mixing  layer height  of 6200 to 6400 ft msl or 1000 to

-------
1200 ft above ground level.  Using the actual pollutant concentrations as

an indicator of mixing layer height leads to  an actual mixing depth of only

600 to 800 ft.   In Figure 6, no significant inversion is indicated, yet the

pollutants are reasonably well confined to a layer about 2000 ft deep.


             November 21 - Pollutant Characteristics in the
                             Urban Plume
        November 21 represents the second day of an episode which

  began during the morning hours of November 20.  During the late

  afternoon and evening of November 20, winds were light and variable

  and a strong radiation inversion developed.  Thus, pollutant levels

  increased over the city.  The morning of November 21 was clear

  with light surface  winds from the south producing  streamlines

  similar to those shown in Figure 2.  By late morning, the wind

  field had started to shift to  an easterly flow, and shortly after noon

  the wind speed increased abruptly to a strong flow from the east,

  moving the pollutants up against the foothills to the west of Denver.

        Figure 7 is a vertical profile taken at 0925 MST near the

  EPA trailer site,  and Figure 8 is another profile taken at the same

  location at 1242 MST.  Figure 7  shows a dense polluted urban plume

  trapped beneath a  strong radiation inversion with clean air above

  the mixing layer.  At this time, photochemical production of ozone

  within the mixing layer had not yet exceeded the scavenging of ozone
  by freshly emitted NO or by NO which had accumulated overnight.

  The ozone level in the mixing layer was thus depressed from the
  clean air level above.

        Figures 9 and 10 illustrate in more detail the character of

  the urban plume during the  morning.   The figures show aerosol size

  distributions obtained at the low point of the spirals shown in Figures

  7 and 8, respectively.  Both surface  and volume distributions are

  plotted.

-------
      Whitby and his associates14*1   have shown that combustion sources
generate fresh aerosol in the size range under 0. 1 |jm diameter.  However,
as the aerosol ages and photochemical generation of new aerosol material
occurs, the size distribution will shift, and the aerosol will coagulate
and accumulate in the 0. 1-1 (am diameter size range.  This process is
accelerated if the fresh combustion aerosol is  emitted into a background
of aged polluted air already containing large amounts of particulates in
the 0.1-lM-m  size range.
      The  surface distribution shown in Figure 9 includes both a
large peak at 0.4|j.m diameter (called the "accumulation mode" by Whitby)
and a smaller inflection in the distribution at 0. 04^m diameter.  This
indicates that the morning urban plume at this  location consists of a
mixture of well-aged pollutants accumulated over night plus freshly
emitted effluents.
      By the time the  1242  MST sounding (Figure  8) near the EPA
trailer was made,  the wind shift mentioned earlier had occurred.
Cleaner, rural air had replaced the urban plume existing at this loca-
tion earlier in the day (0925 MST, see Figure 7).  In Figure 8,  the ozone
level is at a clean air value, other pollutant levels are  quite low,  and
the temperature inversion has disappeared.  The  surface area distri-
bution shown in Figure 10 indicates a small amount of fresh combustion
aerosol from an unidentified source nearby, but no large "accumulation"
mode is present.
      Figure  11 is  a profile taken over Standley Lake at 1134.   This
profile shows the change in character of the urban plume as it ages.
The air in the mixing layer had probably traveled north from Denver
and then moved westward with the wind shift.  It had thus had a chance
to age for a few hours since passing over a concentrated source
area.   The profile was taken before  the abrupt increase in wind speed
and an inversion layer is still present.   The mixing layer has deepened
since the morning sounding  due to surface heating, but  the plume is
still confined within a layer about 1000 feet deep.
                                  7

-------
      Primary pollutants such as CO, SO2, and NO x have remained at



relatively high values; but ozone, a secondary pollutant, has now increased



above the clean air value, equaling the Federal ambient air standard of



0.08 ppm in places.  Figure 12 is a size distribution obtained at the



bottom of the  spiral shown in Figure 11. A well-developed "accumu-



lation" mode is seen with little evidence of fresh combution aerosol.




      Thus, as the urban plume ages in the  absence of fresh emissions



and in the presence of sunlight, the aerosol size distribution shifts to



the "accumulation" mode, the rate of production of ozone surpasses the



rate of scavenging,  and the ozone level  increases.  Although it was not



measured independently by the aircraft,  the EPA van  data show that, as



the plume ages, the NO x shifts from being mostly NO to mostly NO2.



This is consistent with the increase in the ozone level.




      Riehl and Herkhof~ in their studies had assumed that aerosol



mass was a good indicator of the  source strength of the city and that



it was a.  conservative quantity.  It is evident from our results that



photochemical processes occur in the Denver area,  and that the size



distribution in the plume changes with time.  One must use caution



when assuming that aerosol mass or other aerosol  parameters are



conservative quantities since photochemical production of aerosol is



a definite possibility.




Conclusions




1.     Under the conditions measured, Denver was shown to have a



      well-developed and well-mixed urban plume which varied in



      thickness  from 500 to 2000 feet depending on the stability and



      the amount of surface heating.   The temperature lapse rate,



      however,  was not always a good indicator of mixing depth.





2.     Large buoyant  stationary source plumes generate layers aloft



      which are ventilated to the surface when the mixing layer  deepens.

-------
      These plumes are characterized by high levels of primary
      pollutants and a deficit of ozone relative to the surrounding
      air.
3.    The chemical and physical characteristics of the urban plume
      constituents change as the plume ages.  In the presence of NO
      sources and in the absence of photochemistry, ozone is  scavenged;
      but when sunlight is present^ photochemistry  is important, and
      ozone levels in the urban plume can reach or exceed the Federal
      ambient air standards.   Photochemical production of aerosol
      may also occur in the plume.
4.    The aerosol size  distribution changes  shape  as the plume ages,
      and the submicron aerosol accumulates in the 0. 1 to 1 |j.m diameter
      size range.
5.    The ozone level in clean air outside the urban plume was measured
      at  0. 03 to 0. 05 ppm on all flights, while the level in the plume
      varied from 0. 00  to 0. 08 ppm depending on the level of photochemical
      activity and the amount  of scavenging by other pollutants.
Acknowledgments
      This research was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency,
and was  performed in cooperation with Dr. Jack Durham and Dr. William
Wilson of EPA.  Some of the instrumentation used on board the air-
craft was kindly made available to the project by the California Air
Resources  Board.

-------
 References

 1.     H.  Riehl and D.  Herkhof, "Weather Factors in Denver Air Pollution,"
       An abridged version of the final report to the U.  S.  Dept.  of Health
       Education and Welfare,  Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State
       Univ.,  ASPflSS,  1970.

 2.     H.  Riehl and D.  Herkhof, "Some aspects of Denver air pollution
       meteorology," J. Appl. Meteor.,  11, 1040(1972).

 3.     L.  W.  Crow, "Air Pollution in the Denver Area, " Public Service
       Company of Colorado,  1967.  (Pamphlet)

 4.     H.  Riehl and L.  W. Crow, "A Study of Denver Air Pollution, "
       Atmospheric Science Technical  Report No.  33, Colorado State
       Univ.,  1962.

 5.     R.  B. Husar, D. L. Blumenthal,  J. A.  Anderson, and W.  E. Wilson,
       "The Urban Plume of St. Louis, "  presented at the 166th National
       Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Los Angeles,  California
       (April, 1974).

 6.     J.  F. Stampfer  and J.  A. Anderson, "Locating and some of the charac-
       teristics of the St.  Louis urban plume at 80 and  120 km, " submitted
       to  J. Atmos. Environ.

 7.     Fate of Atmospheric Pollutants  Study, NCAR, personal comments.

 8.     D.  L. Blumenthal and D. S.  Ensor, "The Use of Light Aircraft
       to Measure the Three-Dimensional Distribution of Air Pollutant, "
       presented at 1972 Annual Meeting  of the  Air Pollution Control
       Association, Pacific Northwest  International Section,  Eugene,
       Oregon (November  1972).

 9.     B.  Y. H.  Liu, K.  T. Wbitby, and D. Y. H.  Pui,  " Portable
       Electrical Aerosol Analyzer for Size Distribution Measurement
       of Subrnicron Aerosols, " Paper No. 73-283 presented at the
       66th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association,
       Chicago, Illinois (June 1973).

10.     D.  L. Blumenthal,  "Measurement of Physical and Chemical Plume
       Parameters Using an Airborne Monitoring System," Paper No.
       73  AP16 presented at the 1973 Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution
       Control Association, Pacific Northwest International Section,
       Seattle, Washington (November  1973).
                                 10

-------
11.     L. W. Crow, "Airflow Study Related to EPA Field Monitoring
       Program Denver Metropolitan Area November,  1973," Report
       LWC #128 prepared for Chemistry and Physics Laboratory,
       Environmental Protection Agency, February 1,  1974.

12.     J.  Durham,  T.  Ellestad,  and R.  Patterson,  Denver 1973 EPA
       Mobile Lab Data,  final distribution of the AARS mobile lab's
       meteorological, gas, and bgca^. data, February 1, 1974,

13.     This topic is discussed in a report being prepared by Blumenthal,
       et al., Meteorology Research,  Inc., for the California Air
       Resources Board,  to be released in the summer of 1974.  A
       report on ozone background levels is also presently in prepara-
       tion by R. Rassmussen of Washington State University for the
       National Academy  of Sciences.

14.     K. T. Whitby, R.  B. Husar, and B.  Y. H.  Liu, "The aerosol
       size  distribution of Los Angeles smog," J.  of Colloid and Interface
       Science,  39,  211 (1972).

15.     K. T. Whitby and R. B.  Husar, "Growth mechanisms and size
       spectra of photochemical aerosols, " Environ. Sci. and Technol.,
       7, 3,  241 (1973).
                                 11

-------
                                                                   EH
                                                                   CO

                                                                   2

                                                               §0
                                                               • rt  O
                                                                   ro
                                                                to
                                                                (D
                                                                CO
                                                                C  £
                                                                «>   a
                                                                fl   £
                                                               • r-l   O
                                                               CM
                                                                cd
                                                                4)
                                                                fn

                                                                rt
                                                                U)
                                                                fi
                                                                  ^
                                                               Q   nS
                                                                 •   U)
                                                                    fl
                                                                   p   r
                                                                   CO   to
12

-------
            URBAN PLUME
                                            QUANTITY   SYMBOL   FULL SCALE


                                                            0.5 ppm

                                                            10 « 10-1* n
                                                                        -i 100Z
                                              «c«t

                                              RQx

                                              S02

                                              CO
                         0.5 ppm

                         1 ppn

                         50 ppm
            POWER PLANT

               PLUME
    \   m    I \  .^  /^\ «:^ jj \
                              '    ".tfrsT   r-*iN7 V*W   \/
    z-z-z.
             ,      ,
    U-U-U-O-U  \  O-U-LJ
    (\J-fy-(v— <\j— cj-(\j-» - fvj— <^J- (vj -
                    1.5
                                     3.0
                                    Miles
                                                      4.5
                                                                      6.0
Figure 3.  Cross  section of Denver urban plume at 6200 ft msl along

Sampling Route II.  November 20, 1973,  1000 MST.
                                     13

-------

      "TV
          IA 1   ,0-u/    >        u
      ^--»--»u   7x>-tJ  \       Jt-
      »-»' r>Tt*"i    M   \   tcJ'ct — *--»*;
          / l\oV.i-jf--*--i-\t— AKxb-o-u'
                                     r§
                           O  0 ^

                           W^ O >-4 1 O ^
                                       o

                                       n




                                       O

                                     ^  4J




                                       O
                                             H
                                             U5
                                             LO

                                             in

                                             o
                                             0s
                                             a;
                                             xi

                                             a
                                             txi

                                             (U

                                             C
                                      ^8
                                                                               *"! £ ?-*
                                                                                I 6. &  i
                                                                                 % O r+ I O -H
                                                                           /p,
                                         at
                                         y
                                         a
                                                                                             o


                                                                                             4)
                                                                                                   H
                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                   CM
                                               OJ

                                               "•3

                                               C
ertical pro
(isw u do saayQNnH)  3onnnv
(isw  id jo
aannnv
                                O — '
                                                                                                   00
                                          14

-------
                         X-x-x-x-x-x-fc
     e H
        o
    X X •


  elS7 3I
  a a  x: o a. E
  a.  x o w   a.
   tn      ir» a.
  o • o o «o -
  m O ^ tH I  O *-4
   ,
 J*
NT
>->->->- » •>->-> •> ->->-&•'
                               /*-•--»-
                              »' xo-o
                                           0)
                                           u
                                                o
                                                CNJ
                                                a
                                                a)
                                                o
                                                ^
                                                «J

                                                O
                                                   o
                                                   o
 (isw  u  jo  soayoNOH)  aoniinv
                                    o >
                                    aL UJ
                                    U _J
                           15

-------
   (/>
f> I-
Q O
                                                          «/> t-
-2 H g° H
3 **"' w Zi 5>5 cn
w ^ ^B* . j
""> S CM
M ^

"i
w
_J 1
_||
•t's
L°-7s"i
m m Gk
1 	 '

t- 1
i So S| 8*8
|| "*


A
/
j \










,




*\
>«
z
/I




2






^ /" »
*-K_^,»— -'-"._^"-t--/^ Vffl /
TK "
H-fr M-l\rlM-M-M-M->»- W / V
JJ^^t-S^Nir^-fs* C\
a- -»-« a/*-«»'0^»/'B"a>HII" x,»-
J t—t-t-f'^''''
^O-O-O-U-O-o-o-O-O / \J \ XU-U-U

• r"^ — 	 — i i 	 i 	 1 	 ] 	 "
f^ IO o Ml tj U1 u
'S ^
(VJ

r-
r-H
*— 1
(M
H
,0
i

o

. 4)
«} J]
on r~l
IM '^
0 h
+* "^
4) <
y n.
* ri
« w

 fn
ZJ UJ oc UJ
O > O _J
fl£ UJ
O -1
                                             16

-------
                                                                                     flj
            E
          E O
          2  •
            rH
         O V
          E CN
          a a\
         00 *""*


         i •
            UJ
         UJ t_>
             .
         —i a:
         o o
                                                                                     nJ   
                  t-4
                                             o
                                             o
                                             CO
                                          o
                                          o
                                      60K7/SV
                               o
                               CM
                            o
                            CO
                                                                                      o
   E
 31  •
   i~4
o v
i-d m

v -5

~ec>
OO

 I
 UJ (->
 a: <
                                                                               s
                                                                               a.
                                                                   •i  CD   .
                                                                   j2  » H
                                                                   J3  £• W
                                                                    O     ^


                                                                   "3  - ^
                                                                    co  rp (\j
                                                                    O  «S O
                                                                    h  h O
                                                                    cu  •*->

                                                                    05  
-------
Y fW * ?  T

?%u
   ftV"~-H  T  x
    X-"  '7
o
Ul
a:
a
z
                                              ARVADA WINDS ALOFT
                                                  (KNOTS)
          I   /
1  If?   y
 S >./  
— -s-
l—
_j
<
so-
\ X 11 *~~. < co
» C it ^-» N 0|
'«.t
CM
Tt«p
MO^
»J

50 ».
0.3 »»«
10 » 10-* I.-1
10 CH-1 « 10*
-3 to »3*C
0.3 j>p-
1 W«

                                                           T
                       Percent of sceile
                                                           100X
  Figure 11.  Vertical profile over Standley Lake, November 21,

   1973, 1134 MST.
          200 -i
          160
        S
        m
          120 '
        en
        5
          80
           40 •
              r2000
                  -1600
               -1200
                 a
                o
                     TOTAL VOLUME - 85 ymVcm3 <1.0 um

                     TOTAL SURFACE - 1465 pm2/cm3 <1.0 ym
                              SURFACEv
                                               VOLUME
                  - 800
                  • 400
                0.01
                                                   i.'o
                         Dp,
      Figure 12.  Size distribution of aerosol obtained at

      lowest part of spiral over Standley Lake (see Figure

      11).  November 21,  1973,  1134  MST.
                          18

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-450/3-74-06
                                                             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4 TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 Determination of the Feasibility of the Long-Range
 Transport of Ozone or Ozone Precursors
             5. REPORT DATE
               November 1974
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHOR(S)
 D.  L. Blumenthal, W. H.  White,  R.  L. Peace,
 and T. B.  Smith
                                                             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
 Meteorology Research, Inc.
 Box 637,  464 W.  Woodbury Road
 Altadena,  Calif.  91001
 (A subsidiary of Cohu, Inc. )	
                                                             1O. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
              11. CONTRACT/GRAN r NO.

               68-02-1462
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 Environmental Protection Agency
 Office of Air and Waste Management
 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
 Research Triangle Park, N.  C.  27711
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Final
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Thig  report was prepared with the  cooperation of the
 California Air Resources Board,  Sacramento, California.
16. ABSTRACT
         In the last few years, Meteorology Research, Inc.  (MRI) has conducted numerous
    studies of the three-dimensional distribution and transport of air pollutants.  From the
    extensive data base collected, the export of ozone  or its  precursors from the Los Angeles-
    and Denver metropolitan areas was documented.  Analysis of the July 25, 1973 smog
    episode in the Los Angeles Air Basin indicated that ozone was being exported from the
    western,  heavily urbanized,  portion of the basin at rates exceeding 100 metric tons per
    hour during much of the afternoon.  High ozone concentrations confined to the  surface
    mixing layer in the relatively remote mountain and  desert areas east and northeast of
    Los Angeles were documented and traced back to their probable  source in the -Los Angeles
    Air Basin.  The stability of ozone at elevated concentrations was documented by observations
    in the Los Angeles  Air  Basin during July 26-27, 1973 which revealed a layer of aged
    polluted  air above  the surface mixing layer, with  ozone  concentrations which remained
    undiminished at 0. 12  -  0. 13 ppm throughout the night.  Standard diffusion estimates based
    on one episode indicated that, over flat terrain in the absence of scavenging mechanisms,  an
    ozone source the size of the Los Angeles metropolitan area could cause ozone  concentrations
    to exceed the Federal standard of 0. 08 ppm at locations as far away as 260 km.  From the
    data studied, it was concluded that urban sources can have a substantial effect on ozone
    concentrations in downwind areas, and that this effect can carry over more than one day.
17.
a
                                 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
  Ozone
  Transport
  Meteorology
  Photochemical
  Measurements
  Airborne
                                               b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           t.  COSATI Field/Group
13 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Release unlimited
19 SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
  N/A
                                                                             NO. OF PAGES
                                               20 SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                  N/A	
                                                                           22 PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------
                                                           INSTRUCTIONS

    1.    REPORT NUMBER
         Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

    2.    LEAVE BLANK

    3.    RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
         Reserved for use by each report recipient.

    4,    TITLE AND SUBTITLE
         Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
         type or otherwise subordinate it to mam title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
         number and include subtitle for the specific title.

    5.    REPORT DATE
         Fach report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis  on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
        approval, date of preparation, etc.).

    6.    PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
         Leave blank.

    7.    AUTHOR(S)
         Give name(s) in conventional  order (John R Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
         zation.

    8.    PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT  NUMBER
         insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

    9.    PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
         Give name, street, city, state,  and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

    10.   PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
         Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

    11.   CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
         Insert contract or grant  number under which  report was prepared.

    12.   SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
         Include ZIP code.

    13.   TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
         Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

    14.   SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
         Leave blank.

    15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
         Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as.  Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented at conference of,
         To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

    16.   ABSTRACT
         Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
         significant bibliography or literature  survey, mention it here.

    17.   KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
         (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that  identify the major
         concept of  the research  and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entiles for cataloging.

        (b) IDENTITIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
        ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists

         (c) COSATI IIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the  1965 COSATI Subject Category List.  Since the ma-
        jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
         endeavor, or type of physical  object.  The apphcation(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that \\ ill follow
         the primary postmg(s).

    18.   DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
         Denote releasabihty to the public or  limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited."  Cite any a\ailability to
         the public,  with address and price.

    19. &20.  SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
         DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

    21.   NUMBER OF PAGES
         Insert the total number  of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

    22.   PRICE
         Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73) (Reverse)

-------
d
w
r*
i—<
n
>
H
»—*
O
25
2
O

w
                                                  Q. —
                                                  Q. _


                                                  ?i
                                                  U> Q.
                                                  ^ °
                                                  S z
                                                  So
                                                  re
                                                  Cl
                                                 D
                                                 O CD

                                                 » <
                                                 a n
                                                 10
                                                 O)
O
CV
                                                   D
                                                                               O-o
                                                                                O
                                                                             m -'O
                                                                             •
                                                                              O m
                                                                              -« w
                                                                              65
                                                                              z *•
                                                                              j.6
                                                                              O
                                                                              m

                                                                              n

-------