-------
71
two boundaries. Johnson (1975) compared the results obtained from
assuming these different boundary conditions on the resulting mass
flux distribution with those obtained by explicitly including the
effects of liquid water on the cloud buoyancy. He found that more
reasonable results were obtained when the virtual temperature calcu-
lations accounted for the presence of liquid water. We will employ
Johnson's approach here with the following arguments reflecting his
work.
Therefore, the cloud top is defined as the point at which,
608qu(Xi,p) - q4(p)l - T(p)[l + .608q(p)] (25)
where q^ is the liquid water mixing ratio. With the assumptions
regarding the cloud-top and cloud-base temperatures made, the evalu-
ation of the moist static energy at these two levels can now be made.
Neglecting the pressure difference between the cloud and its
environment we can use a Taylor's series to expand about the satura-
tion point to obtain an expression for the updraft specific humidity
-------
72
Tu - T s J__J_ (hu- h*) (27)
and
where
Y s L_ r3l*S - (29)
°P 3T P
Using
q* = .622e (30)
(P - .378es)
where es is the saturation vapor pressure, and the Clausius-Clapeyron
equation, the following expression for y can be obtained,
Y H Lr3q i = .622L2e,P (31)
following Johnson (1975), Equations (25), (27) and (28) can be com-
bined to give the following expression for the cloud-top moist static
energy
* *
hu = n - LU(1 +y)f.608(q - q) - q.l
(32)
-------
73
where
s c«T (33)
Note that the value given for ^ in Equation (32) is independent of
X£ since we have assumed that only one class of clouds detrains, or
has its cloud tops, at any given level.
This relationship, in conjunction with Equation (24) enables one
to solve for the entrainment rate X that is to be ascribed to each
cloud class, given that the environment is conditionally unstable and
therefore will permit clouds to occur. The procedure is as follows:
1. assuming q^ » 0 at cloud base, use Equation (32) to determine
the cloud base moist static energy hu(p ).
B
2. move up an increment Ap from the cloud base, taken to be 5 mb
in this study, and calculate the cloud-top moist static
energy hu(p])) from Equation (32) where pp indicates the
detrainment level (cloud-top- level)
3. iteratively solve the following equation for \:
VPD) " —L— IW + / nCXi.p^Hh dp] - o
"&i>P ) p p (34)
D o
4. repeat steps 2 and 3 until the top of the model atmosphere is
is reached or at least until the maximum cloud top height is
reached.
In actual practice, there were instances where the zeros of Equation
(34) were nonexistent. In those cases, the value of X was chosen to
correspond to the minimum of the equation.
Upon completion of steps 1-4 one will necessarily have obtained
the distribution of Xj[(p) which is the vertical profile of the
-------
74
entrainment rates a.s a function of assumed cloud-top pressures.
This, therefore completes the first phase of the task of solving for
the cloud-base pollutant flux distribution. Figure 2.3-2 illustrates
a profile of X^Cp) thus obtained. By defining the cloud field in
terms of cloud classes, each of which has had a unique entrainment
rate ascribed to it, one is able to explicitly link the cloud-base
pollutant flux due to a particular cloud class to the increase in
the concentration of a conservative tracer occuring at its detrain-
nent height, i.e. cloud top. If this air parcel is followed in a
Lagrangian sense, only those clouds that have cloud tops at the
altitude of the air parcel will contribute to the parcel's increase
in pollutant concentration.
Using the same conservation principle for a conservative tracer
as was used for moist static energy in Equation (22), a determination
of the in-cloud concentration of the particular tracer can be deter-
mined from an equation analogous to Equation (24) with a variable
representing the tracer mixing ratio replacing the terms for the
~«pdraft moist static energy, h^. Such a relationship for the in-cloud
tracer concentration does have the short-coming of neglecting any
sources and sinks for the tracer that may be present in the cloud.
Tflthin the guidelines of constructing an operational module for use
in * regional oxidant transport model, it was assumed that the impact
that such processes would have on the regional scale ozone distri-
bution would be small.
-------
75
500
600
.Q
E
700
LJ
to
Ld
800
900
1000
\
XD(p) (km'1)
Figure 2.3-2. Example of model derived entrainment rates
-------
76
2.4 Determination of the Convective-scale
Forcing from Synoptic-scale Variables
Having obtained a continuum of allowable cloud classes via the
methodology outlined in Section 2.3, we now proceed to determine the
cloud forcing functions required for the implicit approach used in
this study. As noted in Section 2.1 and illustrated in Figure 2.1-3,
the determination of the forcing functions constitutes the second
step in the process of determining the cloud-base mass flux distri-
bution for a convective cloud field. As mentioned in Section 2.1,
the determination of the cloud forcing terms from synoptic-scale
variables will be devoid of subsynoptic-scale features. A formalism
designed to fill in this spectral gap is presented in Section 2.5,
where the cloud forcing terms are determined from satellite data.
The convection associated with a cumulus cloud field is the
result of many forces, but they are usually only parameterized in
terms of the 'apparent heat source', 'apparent moisture sink', and
radiative cooling. Of these forcing mechanisms, the 'apparent heat
source* and 'apparent moisture sink' are deduced in terms of the
environmental budgets of heat and moisture as the following analysis
will show.
Another important point of this section is the demonstration of
how the motion on the convective scale is influenced by the proper-
ties of the larger synoptic-scale. The pioneeering efforts of Ooyama
(1964) and Charney and Eliassen (1964) made great strides in the quest
to understand the interactions between the synoptic and convective
scales. They introduced the concept of Conditional Instability of the
Second Kind (CISK) which describes how the cumulus and synoptic-scale
-------
77
motions actually cooperate* In this process, the cumulus clouds
provide the heat which aids the growth of the synoptic-scale waves
while the synoptic-scale feature supplies the moisture that maintains
the cumulus clouds. It has since been well established that the net.
effect of an ensemble of cumulus clouds is to cool and moisten the
environment through detrainment of cloud air and to warm and dry the
environment through subsidence induced motions (Betts, 1973a,b;
Ooyama, 1971). It has therefore been the goal of cumulus parameteri-
zation to determine not how an individual cumulus cloud modifies the
environment, but how an ensemble or group of such clouds influences
the large-scale features. The derivation in this section will show
how the synoptic-scale budgets of heat and moisture, combined with
radiational cooling are related to the vertical flux divergence of
the convective-scale moist static energy and follows the approach
taken by Arakawa and Schubert (1974), Ogura and Cho (1973) and
Johnson (1975).
Ignoring the effects of ice phase latent heat release, the heat
budget for a parcel of air can be expressed in terms of the net rates
of condensational heating (c), evaporational cooling (e) and radiative
heating (QR) in the following way:
Ds_ - L(c-e) + QR (35)
Dt
where the dry static energy, s = CpT + gz, L is the latent heat of
condensation, and D/Dt is the total derivative operator defined as
IL = L- + Y*vh + "L.
Dt 8t 3p
-------
78
Using specific humidity (q) as the variable, the moisture budget can
similarly be written as:
Dq_ - -c + e (36)
Dt
Expanding the total derivative in (35), for example,
Ds_ - 3_s + V.VfcS + u3_s - L(c-e) + QR (37)
Dt 3t " 3
and using the continuity equation,
V-V + at.) » 0 (38)
" 3P
Equation (37) becomes,
IB + 7h-(Vs) = a_(us) - L(c-e) + QR (39)
3t " 3p
applying the Reynold's averaging technique by substituting
U"U+U'", V^V + V^jW^W+u", 8=3+ S"
m •* «»•» w
-------
79
assuming that Vh'(Y's') « 3(to's')/3p we get:
= 3_s_ + Vh- (V s) + 3_(u s) - L(c-e) + QR - 3_(u)'s- ) (41)
3t " 3p 3p
for the heat budget and similarly:
Q2 5 -L[3_£ + Vh»(V q) + 3_(u q)] - L(c-e) + I3_(
3t " 3p 3p
for the moisture budget, where QI and Q£ are respectively termed the
'apparent heat source1 and 'apparent moisture sink* and gives a mea-
sure of the heating and moisture depletion that a cumulus cloud field
has on the large-scale environment. These quantities are determined
using the methods described in Section 2.2. Since the moist static
energy is defined by h = s + Lq, Equations (41) and (42) may be
combined to give:
Ql - Q2 - QR = ill + ?h' ^ h) + 2—(u h) * -§_
3t " 3p 3p
The parameterization and interpretation of the r.h.s. of
Equation (43), which represents the vertical flux divergence of moist
static energy due to convective scale motion, forms the basis for
calculating the cloud-base mass flux. This quantity can then be
used to determine the vertical redistribution of a conservative
tracer. The parameterization of the r.h.s. of Equation (43) is
described in Section 2.6.
-------
80
Rewriting equation (43), following Johnson (1975) we define
PB
F(p) = - 1 J (Qi - Q2 - QR) dp (44)
"
which results in:
r
F(pB) = (-lVhO)B (45)
g
which is the total convective heat flux, sensible plus latent, at
cloud base. From the meaning of Qj, Q2 and QR we can conceptually see
then that F(pg) is the summation of the cloud forcing terms, appearing
In the integrand in Equation (44), over the depth of the cloud field.
This term will be derived from another framework in Section 2.5 and
will form the basis of a new approach in determining the cloud-base
mass flux*
2.5 Determination of the Convective-scale
Forcing from a 'Bulk' Perspective
Section 2.4 showed how the convective-scale 'apparent heat
source1 and 'apparent moisture sink' terms are deduced from the
synoptic-scale budgets of heat and moisture. These terms, along with
the radiative heating rate, have been used by many researchers to
determine the convective cloud-base mass flux once the magnitude of
these large-scale forcing mechanisms have been determined. Although
this approach has been shown to give reliable results when applied
to tropical regions (Yanai e_t^ aJL, 1973; Arakawa and Schubert, 1974;
Johnson, 1975, 1977), it encounters several problems when applied to
-------
81
a mid-latitude situation in an operational sense, some of which were
mentioned in Section 2.1. As illustrated in Figure 2.1-3, this
section proposes an alternative formalism for determining the
convective-scale forcing that employs the use of visible and infrared
satellite imagery. This approach has been labeled as the explicit
method in Section 2.1.
The method described in this section centers around earlier works
by Kuo (1965, 1974). In his works he obtained the area of a cumulus
cloud by proposing a relationship between the half-life of the cloud,
the moisture needed to form the cloud and the net moisture convergence
as determined from synoptic-scale variables and ground evaporation.
In this work Kuo's process has been inverted to determine the effec-
tive net moisture convergence based on a vertical distribution of
cumulus cloud cover determined from satellite observations.
We begin by realizing that what the satellite observes includes
not only those clouds that are actively venting pollutants from"the
mixed layer, but also those that have passed their development stage
and are dissipating. In order to differentiate between these cloud
types, we employ the concepts developed by Stull (personal communi-
cation) and Deardorff et al. (1980) to determine the active updraft
area for each grid cell. As depicted in Figure 2.1-5, the fractional
area covered by these updrafts is quite small.
. The relationship between the updraft area and the total cloud
area appears to be a very complex one. Zipser and LeMone (1980)
found that cumulonimbus updrafts may occupy 15 - 18% of the total
cloud area. It is expected, however, that although the ratio of
updraft area to cloud area may vary substantially, the coverage of
-------
82
updrafts in relation to the larger scale may be only a few percent
(Bjerknes, 1938; Zipser and LeMone, 1980). It is this small number
that must be determined if satellite data are to be explicitly used
In obtaining cloud-base mass fluxes.
Once the total updraft area is determined, the ratio of updraft
area to total cloud area, as determined by the satellite's visible
imagery, is obtained. Upon assuming that this ratio is independent
of cloud class one is able to determine the spectral distribution of
updraft area by multiplying the vertical profile of cumulus coverage
by this ratio. This distribution, along with a specification of the
half-life and the moisture requirement for each cloud class is then
utilized in determining the effective net moisture convergence which
is used as the forcing function for the explicit method.
The approach we will follow in this section to obtain a value for
the updraft area will parallel that of Stull (personal communication).
Inherent to this approach is the recognition of the existence of an
-entrainment zone, the concept of which was developed by Deardorff et
al. (1980), and is illustrated in Figure 2.5-1.
The entrainment zone is bounded on the top by height H£ which
.marks the highest level to which mixed-layer thermals can penetrate.
In the absence of clouds, mixed-layer air will not penetrate above
this level. The bottom of this zone is bounded by HJ which represents
the highest level at which most of the air can be identified as mixed-
layer air. The averaged height of the local mixed-layer top, Z^, is
assumed to be located near the middle of this zone of thickness
AH «• H£ - Hj. The occurence of clouds, which we assume form at
the 'top1 of the mixed layer, is then dependent on whether or not
-------
83
Figure 2.5-1.
An illustration of the entrainment zone which
exists between the mixed layer and the more
stable cloud layer above is shown. H repre-
sents the highest level to which mixed layer
air can penetrate. H? marks the highest level
at which most of the air can be identified as
mixed layer air.
-------
84
the local Lifting Condensation Level (LCL) lies within the entrainment
zone. The location of the LCL was determined from the following
equation:
ZLCL 2 B(T-Td)sfc + Zsfc (46)
where B » 120 m, (T~T(j)sfc is the surface dew— point depression and
Z8fc is the terrain height. It was determined that an explicit
determination of the local mixed-layer height was outside the scope
i .
of this work, however, for the purpose of executing the present
model, it was assumed that:
zLCL
which is a reasonable assumption for a well-established, steady-state
booundary layer. Once the local mixing height has been located by
Equation (47), the thickness of the entrainment zone AH is obtained
following Stull (personal communication). In his work, he obtained
the following relationship between Z± and AH from the results of
Deardorf f et_ al. (1980):
A. - 0.19 + 1.07 9 w% (48)
where 0 is the mixed-layer potential temperature, A9 is the potential
temperature jump between the mixed layer and the overlying stable
layer, g is the gravitational constant and w* is the free convection
scaling velocity. Stull states that values of AH/Z^ normally range
/
-------
85
from 0.20 to 0.25, realizing that in certain situations, a value of
0.5 may be attained. Physically, this means that the depth of the
entrainment zone ranges from 20% to 25% of the mixed-layer depth.
This is in stark contrast to previous studies in which the transition
zone between the mixed layer and cloud layer is assumed to be infin-
itely thin (Ogura et_ al. , 1977; Arakawa and Schubert, 1974). Due to
the lack of better data Stull let
AH « 0.23 (49)
Zi
Since boundary-layer mechanics are not explicitly incorporated in this
effort, the value of 0.23 will likewise be assumed. Therefore, given
the value of Z^ from Equation (47), AH- can be determined from Equation
(49). The location of HI and H£ are then determined by assuming that
the locally averaged mixed-layer height (Z.^) is located at the center
of AH.
As mentioned earlier in this section, the existence of clouds is
dependent on the location of the LCL relative to the entrainment zone.
Due to the transitory nature of Z^ in space and time, given that the
LCL does lie within AH, the fractional coverage of cumulus clouds can
therefore best be described in a statistical sense. Stull utilized
this premise by deriving a Gaussian probability density distribution
function G(z), which appeared to fit the data of Deardorff et al.
(1980), such that the probability of finding the local Z± within the
entrainment zone AH, over a specified local domain can be expressed
as:
1 - / G(5)d$ (50)
Hi
-------
86
which means that one is certain to find the local mixed-layer top
within the entrainment zone. The probability of finding mixed-layer
air at height z would then (following Stull) be:
z H2
P(z) = 1 - / G(c)d£ = / G(£)dC (51)
Therefore, the probability of finding clouds within the entrainment
zone would be:
H2
/ G(5)d5 (52)
ZLCL
Stull interpreted the value of o resulting from this equation to give
the fractional coverage of cumulus clouds. However, since the tracing
fluid used by Deardorff et_ aJL. (1980) in his tank experiment was an
inert substance which lacked the capability of releasing latent heat
as water vapor would, we take the meaning of a to be representative
of the updraft area instead of total cloud area. The value of o thus
obtained can therefore be interpreted as the fractional area coverage
of convective updrafts associated with forced and active cumulus
convection. Forced clouds are those clouds that have not reached
their Level of Free Convection (LFC) and are merely negatively buoyant
remnants of boundary layer thermals. They can be identified in the
atmosphere as cumulus humilis. Active clouds are those that have
reached their LFC and have therefore become positively buoyant due
to the release of latent heat.
-------
87
The probability density distribution function in Equation (52)
has been found to have the form of (Stull, personal communication):
G(z) - 2.42 exp[-18(z - z1 + AH/8)2] (53)
AH AH2
I have found that the application of Equations (52) and (53) for
determining the fractional coverage of cumulus updrafts was very
sensitive to the value given to the lower limit of Integration in
Equation (52). This is undoubtedly a result of the Inability to
calculate Z^ and ZLQL explicitly from a boundary-layer model, in view
of the vertical resolution of the model and the smoothed nature of the
input data. However, reasonable and consistent results were obtained
by setting the lower limit of the integral to the value of Z corres-
ponding to 5 mb above the LCL. This limit may, after all, be
reasonable since this distance could correspond to the difference
between LFC and LCL heights, implying that only active clouds are
considered. This would be consistent with the satellite data since
it Is incapable of resolving forced clouds (those on the cumulus
humilis scale), the cloud tops of which should be within the range
of 5-10 mb above cloud base. The sensitivity of Equation (52) to
the lower limit of the integral will be discussed in Chapter 4.
The ratio of total fractional updraft area, as given by Equation
(52), to the total cloud area, is then:
e - oYC (54)
-------
88
where C is the total observed cumulus cloud cover at cloud base as
determined from the satellite's visible imagery. Assuming that this
ratio is constant for all cloud classes, the fractional cloud updraft
area for each cloud class can then be determined by:
0(p) -e[c(p) - c(p - Ap)] (55)
where c(p) represents the satellite observed cloud cover at each 5 mb
level (via Section 2. 2c).
Since the result of Section 2.3 was a unique distribution of en-
trainment rates as a function of pressure, there exists within the
domain of X(p) a unique value of p for" every Xj such that the follow-
ing one-to-one mapping occurs:
(56)
thereby giving the fractional updraft area as a function of entrain-
ment rate (or cloud class) from:
o(Xi) - e'(Xi) (57)
The spectral distribution of the fractional cloud updraft area is then
^
related to the total fractional updraft area by,
a - / a(Xi)dX (58)
-------
89
As mentioned in the beginning of this section, in order to invert
Kuo's scheme, other parameters besides the spectral distribution of
cloud updraft area must be determined in order to make the parameteri-
zation of the 'bulk' forcing term complete. We now determine the
amount of moisture needed (FC(X^)) to form the updraft cross-sectional
area oCX^) of a cloud in the ith cloud class. The moisture require-
ment can be divided into two terms. The first term represents the
moisture needed to produce the expected temperature differential
between the cloud updraft and the environmental temperature at that
level, caused by latent heat release; while the second term gives the
increase in moisture content in the cloud column over that in the
environment, as shown in the following equation:
I / B[%(Tu - T) + qu - ql dp (59)
8 PT L
where p-j and pg are respectively the cloud-top and cloud-base pres-
sures and Tu and qu are determined from Equations (27) and (28). The
following functional form was assumed for T(X^), the half-life of clouds
in the ifch cloud class:
T(Xi) - [TMN + ((Xn - X1)/Xn)TMX] 2q/q* (60)
where TMN and TMX are set to 15 and 30 minutes respectively and Xn is the
entrainment rate of the lowest cloud class. This ascribes half-lives of
15 and 45 minutes to clouds with respective entrainment rates of Xj_=Xn and
Xi*0 and relative humidities of 50% at .5(pjj - pf)i» The computation of
T(X) is set to limit X < 3.5 and q/q > 0.10. This scheme, although
-------
90
apparently arbitrary, gives values that are within a factor of 2 or 3
of observed values (Lopez, 1977; Kitchen and Caughey, 1981).
The following relationship, essentially identical to that pro-
posed by Kuo, will now be solved for the effective net moisture
convergence (Ff^) required for each cloud class:
(61)
which states that during the half-life T(\^), the amount of moisture
Tf(X^) must be provided for the fractional updraft area a(X^) correspond-
ing to the 1'h cloud class. Since the above computation employs a
diagnostic determination of the cloud field from satellite data, the
value of Tf(Xj^) thus obtained represents an effective 'bulk1 forcing
term due not only to the advection of moisture which could have been
calculated on the synoptic scale, but also implicitly includes the
integrated effect of every force that was occuring at the time of the
satellite observation. Since the clouds that the satellite detected
are the combination of forces that span the entire spectral scale,
they do not therefore need to be individually named nor explicitly
parameterized for, only the effective 'bulk1 forcing term need be
determined. The remaining problem is then how to distribute this
'bulk' forcing term in the vertical. From Equation (44) we saw that
F(p) was the integrated effect of Qj - Q2 - QR over the depth of the
cloud field. This could now be considered analogous to the meaning
of
rf - / rf(xi)dx (62)
-------
91
where Tf is the integrated effect of the net moisture convergence
over all cloud classes. This quantity is then vertically distributed
according to the vertical distribution of cumulus cloud cover, such
that the forcing and cloud cover at any level are directly propor-
tional to each other.
2.6 Determination of the Convective Cloud Mass Flux
Having obtained the function XD(P) from Section 2.3 and the
convectlve-scale forcing terms from Sections 2.4 or 2.5, we are now
ready to determine the parameterization for the convective-scale
vertical flux divergence for moist static energy in terms of the
cloud-base mass flux using the model of the steady-state entraining
plume discussed in Section 2.3. The result of this section will be
an integral equation which must then be subsequently solved for the
cloud-base mass fluxes as a function of cloud class.
It is assumed that the fractional area covered by cumulus up-
drafts is « 1. With o(X)dX defined as the fractional area occupied
by updrafts with entrainment rates such that X - dX/2 < X < X + dX/2,
the grid-scale average of any variable a can then, following Johnson
(1975), be written as:
o(p) - / au(X,p)au(X)dX + (1 - au)a (63)
where a and a are the values of a in the updraft and the environ-
ment, respectively, and where,
-------
92
XD(P)
/ ou(X)dX (64)
0
is the total cumulus updraft area at pressure level p. Using Equation
(63), the large-scale dry static energy and specific humidity can be
expressed as,
and
or as,
and
B « 0su + (1 - a)s (65)
q » cqu + (1 - a)q (66)
s -o(su - s) + s (67)
Now since a « 1, (s - s) < s and (q - q) < q, we can make
the approximations,
s S s and q 2 q (69)
which indicate that the normally observed rawinsonde data can give a
good approximation to the values of s and q in the cloud environment.
With these approximations we can determine the vertical convective
flux of, for example, specific humidity in the following way:
-------
93
__ XD(p)
qto-qw38/ qu(X,p)u>u(X,p)ou(X)dX + (l-au)qu
0
(70)
0u(X)u>u(X,p)dX + (1 - au)u]
u
XD(P)
- / au(X)«u(X,p)[qu(X,p) - q]dX
0
Employing Leibnitz's rule in obtaining the vertical flux divergence
we get,
XD(P)
/ Ou(X)3_>u(X,p)(qu(X,p) - q)]dX (71)
0 3p
Ou(XD)u>u(XD,p)[qu(XD,p) - q]dX
dp
A similar equation can be obtained for the vertical flux divergence of
dry static energy. It is interesting to note at this point in the
derivation that since mu(XD,p)dX represents the mass flux from those
clouds whose entrainment rate is such that XD ~ dX/2 < XD < XD + dX/2,
the last term in Equation (71) is therefore recognizable and the de-
trainment of water vapor into the environment from clouds with tops
as pressure p. A physical explanation for the first term will be
delayed until a few more substitutions can be made.
Desiring a relationship between the specific humidity in the
updraft and that in the environment that involves the mass flux, we
turn to the conservation equation for water vapor in the updraft
-------
94
realizing that its form will be similar to that of Equation (22) for
moist static energy. We therefore have,
3p 3p
where the condensation rate, c, is a sink of water vapor in the
updraft. Equation (72) can be rewritten as,
p) (73)
3p 3p
Using this relationship and the definition mu(X,p) = ~o(X)u(X,p)» we
get,
XD(p)
3_(q'(o')=J [^(X.p)!! - c(X,p)]dX - ' (74)
3p 0 9p
Now, since
mu(XD,p)dXJX[qu(XD,p) - q]
dp
c(p) = / c(X,p)dX (75)
0
we obtain,
c(p) + 6(p)[qu(XD,p) - q] (76)
dp dp
where
-------
95
S(p) = n»u(XD,p)dXji (77)
dp
The large-scale water vapor conservation Equation (42) can therefore
be written as,
+ eu + 5 [qu(AD,P> - q ] (78)
Equation (78) indicates that the apparent moisture sink due to the
action of cumulus clouds can be accounted for in terms of the environ-
mental sinking Mu3q/3p which compensates the updraft cumulus flux
and is reduced by the detrainment of water vapor 6(qu - q) and the
evaporation of liquid water from updrafts.
As mentioned earlier, a similar derivation can be done for the
vertical flux divergence of dry static energy, s. The result of which
is,
- QR = -M^£ - Leu + 6 [s (XD,p) - s] (79)
3P
The interpretation of Equation (79) is very similar to that of
Equation (78) in that the apparent heat source, less the radiative
heating term, is due to the sinking which is compensating for the
cumulus updraft mass flux, the detrainment of s from cloud tops and
is reduced by evaporational cooling from the liquid water detrained
from the updrafts.
-------
96
Combining these last two equations, we get the following rela-
tionship between the large-scale heat and moisture budgets and the
vertical flux divergence of moist static energy due to cumulus up-
drafts:
- Q2 - QR » 5 lhu(XD,p) - h] - M^h_ (80)
3P
which states that the large-scale budget of moist static energy is
determined by radiative heating, the environmental sinking in response
to the cumulus updraft mass flux and the detralnemnt of moist static
energy from cloud tops. Writing Equation (80) in its expanded form
we have,
<81>
dp
. XD(P)
«h / mB(X)nu(X,p)dX
3 0
This is a Volterra integral equation of the second kind. The unknown
variable mg(X), is the function that is required in order to determine
the total cloud-base mass flux of a conservative tracer and, with the
aid of Equation (76), the vertical redistribution of the tracer that
is vented from the boundary layer and deposited into the cloud layer
can now be determined.
The solution of Equation (81) is illustrated in Figure 2.1-8. In
this figure it is shown that, as a result of assuming that only one
cloud class is detraining at any given level (from Section 2.3) and
that a total cloud forcing can be assigned at each level (from Section
-------
97
2.4 or 2.5), the solution for the cloud-base mass flux as a function
of cloud class is accomplished by solving the above equation 'from the
top down1.
-------
CHAPTER 3
MODEL EVALUATION AND INTERCOM?ARISON
Two models have been described in Che previous chapter. The first
is an adaptation for this work of the model developed by Johnson
(1975). The second is an approach that uses the formulation of Kuo
(1965, 1974) to determine the environmental forcing of a cumulus en-
semble based on a unique usage of satellite data. These two models
i
have been respectively called the implicit (im) and explicit (ex)
models in that the first model implicitly assumes a cloud field as a
result of conditional instability in the environment and the second
model explicitly incorporates satellite data into the calculations.
These two models will be evaluated using a real data base which has
also been described in the previous chapter. Three cells in the
Summer Experiment study area have been chosen for this purpose and
represent situations of weak, moderate and strong convection for a
nonprecipitating scenario. Several graphs will be shown for each
of the three cases. In each graph, the values along the ordinate
(pressure) are given at the detrainment level (cloud-top height) for
each cloud class under consideration, remembering from Section 2.3
that these levels were determined on the basis of the fractional
rate of mass entrainment. Table 3-1 lists some of the basic charac-
teristics of the cloud field. It should be noted at this point that
the code provided by Johnson was executed using data that he had
98
-------
99
provided to ensure that it was functioning properly before any mod*
ification to the code was attempted*
Table 3-1
total
cloud-base
case # total cloud cum. cloud max. ht. updraft area heat flux
cov. (frac.) cov. (frac.) (msl) (frac.) (ex) (im)
1
2
3
.574
.720
.331
.476
.533
.331
6000
2800
2200
.0107
.0099
.0072
264 107
204 202
166 66
Table 3-1. Basic characteristics of the cloud field for each grid
cell chosen for an evaluation of the models presented.
Units of heat flux are W m~*2 (ex: explicit model; im:
implicit model).
Figures 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 illustrate the cumulus cloud cover profile
(obtained from satellite data) along with the model derived entrainment
rates for each cloud class for the three cases under consideration.'
The figures indicate that the model derived entrainment rates for the
shortest cloud class are approximately the same for all three cases.
The lack of spatial variability in these entrainment rates may illus-
trate a shortcomming in the model, which may be attributable to a lack
of adequate spatial resolution in the synoptic-scale rawinsonde data.
Since the entrainment rate profiles shown in these figures are incor-
porated into the formulation of both the explicit and implicit methods
(see Figure 2.1-3), errors made in the determination of Xj)(p) will
therefore be embedded into both methods. A more crucial determina-
tion, however, is dXp/dp, which, as one can see from Equation (81), is
required to solve for the cloud base mass flux mB(X). From Figures
-------
100
CM
o
s
o
2
o
£
o
o
o>
8
! | | I 1 i I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I
_^
O>
va
Ul
O
O
trt
**
O
o
s
o
2
o
o
o
o
o>
4) •-)
4j at
CO U
" *
0 O
O <«
M
U 4J
U CO
§ *
0) H
oo u
at C
M 01
-a
O 0)
u >
•H
t) H
3 0)
o -o
iH
O iH
0)
CO 13
3 Q
3
u
to
«a -o
C C. N
0 * O
< U .
cj CO JJ
CO U CE)
l-( CO
*M T3 ^N
O
01 CN
M
00
t-l
fe
-------
101
"
—
***** '.
. . . 1 . . . 1 , . , 1 . , , 1 , 1 ,
^i
x^s
M^
N £
JbC
^^^^^
^o!
V— X
Q
<"k
o o o o o o
88 S § 8 S
~
^ f * f\ MI i "3\JOC^OTJ\1-J
^^ V ^i %^*^ f ^j ^j | i ^^ ^^ ^j ^j ^^
* *
UJ
*•*
•
—
'
^m
—
•f
•MB
i *"
•F
"T"
•!• *
•7" _
4*" J
J. _
^
, , , t . . . 1 . . . 1 . . . t , , ,
v-/
o Ql
Lul
** O
O
(^
**^
_J
^^^
^*»
• ^Ct
«M^
m^J
t o
_ J
**i -^
z
w O
^"•™
h—
•: °
. ' p
00 0 0 0 0 —
o o o o o ^
u$ u5 ^» co o) O
*•«
•H iH
« rH
Cd U
CO
(J
a o
O <*•!
M
M-l CO
CO
•e cd
0) iH
5 °
CU O
4J rH
CU O
tJ
CO O
«rt
w
3 4J
CO U
00 C
4) 3
CU
«w
O CO
cd
e
O CO
i-4 4)
•U 4J
o cd
l«
c
cd 4>
co C
cd -H
cd
CU h
00 4J
cd c
M 4)
4)
> T)
O 4)
"0 M
3 4)
0 T3
^^
O iH
4) •
co **d '•-^
3 O CM
« Q "^^
PH (3 ^**
3
a oi
3 ^ CO
y ja 03
v_/ CJ
i— 1 ^— '
c a N
o to o
•H CM
4J *
O tO 4J
ed w tfl
ui cd
<4-l "O *"*
O
4) CM
ed i-l f^
CM
cn
4)
Wi
3
00
-------
102
•
*
•H+H- +
.
•
. , . i . , , i . . . i . . , l , . ,
— i
s~+*
0* ~
E
V
••••
v»x
^^^^\
Q.
>wx
O
_^
<<
f\
o o o o o o
O Q O Q O S
u> <3 r«. oo o> o
_ ~"
s Oqw) 3ynss3ad
*
. - Ld
—
•
-
•
_
^
•
^
.
^•B
•
+
•
+
* :
•
, , i s i i i t i i j — i — i i i j — i — i — i —
-' 0
o> o:
Ld
^^
« o
o
r^
f/l
V*
^ 3
_j
ID
^ 2
•^3
t o
«J
iO ^
• ^^
CN 0
O
^
*<
Q£
0 1.
88888§
lJ> 3 fs 00 0> O
^ ^
« r-l
U v
a u
* w
a o
O >4-l
(4
M-l (0
CO
•O (0
0) iH
C U
•H
S -0
H 3
0» O
•u iH
0) U
•o
>M
CO O
tQ
C
25
3 4J
n u
n C
o> 3
LJ '* *
p* *m
o.
CO
n *
'M
O O
cs rt
o n
•H 0)
W. i
*j
O (0
C K
g
-a
Ortl
V
y >
•j^
T> l-l
3 (U
o -a
i™ ^
CJ M •
eg s-*
CO T3 fl
3 O =«*!
iH g
30)
S en
3 /-^ «J
y ja o
v^ >*^
-^
•
m
A
S
5,
-------
103
3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 we see that dXD/dp for case #3 (Figure 3-3) is sig-
nificantly less than that for the same relative portion of the Xp(p)
profile for cases 1 and 2. Since the solution of the Volterra equa-
tion (Equation 81) is sensitive to small dXj)/dp in the region near
the detrainment level (cloud top) of the lowest few cloud classes, a
lower limit of 0.0002 km mb for dX^/dp was therefore imposed on
the system, thus preventing excessively large values of mass flux
from being computed. A possible modification to the present formula-
tion that would mitigate the problems outlined above will be mentioned
later in this chapter.
The rationale for placing the profile of fractional cumulus cover-
age next to the profile of Xp(p) is that the information contained in
the calculated Xjj(p) profile concerning cloud-top heights should be a
reflection of the information given in the observed profile of the
fractional cumulus coverage. Remembering that (1) the values shown
in, for example, Figure 3-l(b) are chosen at equal values of AX, and
(2) the meaning of Xj)(p) (cloud-top detrainment pressure level), the
regions where dA^/dp becomes large should imply that the detrainment
levels (cloud-tops) of several cloud classes are calculated to be
grouped near the same pressure level. Such a level exists between
700-725 mb in Figure 3-1(b). This calculated 'leveling-off' of the
cloud-top heights is reflected in the observed profile of fractional
cumulus coverage between 700-725 mb in Figure 3-1(a) and lends a degree
of credibility to the model's depiction of the atmosphere, at least for
deeper clouds. This relationship is again seen in Figure 3-2 where
dXp/dp is nearly constant throughout the cloud layer as is the change
in fractional cumulus cloud cover with pressure. It is diffucult to
-------
104
determine if this relationship is illustrated by the data shown in
Figure 3-3, which represents a shallow nonprecipitating convective
scenario, due to the resolution problem outlined above.
Employing the solution of Equation (81) for mg(X) and Equations
(20) and (21), the total convective upward mass flux that penetrates
level p is given by,
X(p)
- / mu(X,p)dX (82)
X - 0
Figure 3-4 shows the resulting profile of Mu (the vertical mass
flux distribution) for the explicit and implicit models as applied to
case #1. Mass conservation within the cell is then obeyed by deter-
mining the induced environmental motion (M) that is compensating
the updraft mass flux Mu from Equation (4) given M, which is obtained
from Equations (12) and (13). One can see from the figure that the
values from the two models are approximately equal at the top and
bottom of the curve, with the explicit model having larger values at
the intermediate levels. The difference in the shape of the profiles
of M and M between the explicit and implicit models is a result of
their respective forcing functions which stem from an observed cumulus
cloud profile (for the explicit method) or from synoptic-scale rawin-
sonde data (for the implicit method).
Figure 3-5 shows the cloud-base mass flux distribution, mg(p),
resulting from the two models (for case #1) and is determined by,
mB(X)dXD/dp (83)
The graph of mg(p)dp gives the cloud-base mass flux for clouds that
-------
105
(a)
MO
600 .
Xt
N_X
UJ
or
UJ
0:
CL
-12 -10 -8-6-4-2
10 12
MASS FLUX (mb. hr"1)
(b)
600
JS
I »
UJ
or
K "o
Ul
or
a.
' 900
1000
-
: * * * ** \
- * * * * 1
.* '
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 f
+ TOTAL UPWARD MASS FLUX (Mu)
» ENVIRONMENTAL MASS FLUX (B)
<> LARGE-SCALE MASS FLUX (M)
<
+ + +
i i i i i i I I i I i
-12 -10 -8-6-4-2
8 10 12
MASS FLUX (mb. hr'1)
Figure 3-4. Vertical mass flux distribution for
(a) explicit model, and (b) implicit
model at 20Z (case //I).
-------
106
(a)
.a
*-*>
UJ
o:
ID
ui
oc
o.
MO
600
700
!V
•00
IflOQI • I • I . I . I i I .
0123456
mB(p) (day"1)
500
(b)
600
TOO
LJ
ce
ui
a:
a.
«oo
1000
1 _L _L
mB(p) (day"1)
Figure 3-5. Cloud-base mass flux distribution
mjj(p) for (a) explicit model, and
(b) implicit model at 20Z (case #1),
-------
107
detrain at a level p such that p + dp>p>p- dp. Therefore, from
this graph, we are able to visualize the relative contribution to the
total cloud-base mass flux from cloud classes that detrain at the var-
ious levels. From Figure 3-5(a) we see a feature between 775 and 700
mb that seems to correspond to the feature found at the same level in
the fractional cumulus coverage shown in Figure 3-1(a). This is to be
expected since the forcing functions used for the explicit model, de-
rived in Section 2.5, are based on cumulus coverage. The implicit
model, on the other hand, shows a sharp decrease in the mass flux con-
tribution for clouds whose detrainment levels are between 800-735 mb,
while the contribution from clouds whose tops are above 735 mb is rel-
atively constant. The sharp decrease'below 800 mb is dubious for
several reasons: (1) the sensitivity of the solution of Equation (81)
to dXp/dp in the region of the detrainment levels for the lowest few
cloud classes; (2) the sensitivity of mB(p) to d\j)/dp (via Equation
83); and (3) the lack of spatial variability in the forcing functions
for shallow clouds which would allow for boundary layer influences.
The effects of (1) and (2) counteract each other since a variation
of d\D/dp has opposite influences on the magnitudes of mg(X) (via
Equation 81) and mg(p) (via Equation 83) although the effect of
dAp/dp on mB(X) near cloud base may be greater than linear, whereas
the influence of dXj)/dp on mg(p) is linear at all levels.
Figure 3-6 shows the important result of cloud venting. In this
process, air of mixed-layer origin is vented from the mixed layer and
is subsequently deposited, or detrained, into the cloud layer. An
increase in the cloud-layer concentration of the pollutant therefore
ensues. For the purposes of these calculations a nonreactive pollu-
-------
108
(a)
.a
£
ui
tx
tn
on
a.
MO
600
TOO
900
1000
-5
4- CLOUD DCTRAINMCNT
-2
-1
"1
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr")
ww
(b)
600
J$
•*-* 700
Ul
or
I/) *°°
Ul
a:
a.
900
1000
•
-
•
^ . 1 . 1 . 1 . I .
4- CLOUD DCTRAINMCNT
f ' . '
+ +*+H
I • | • I • I i.
-S
-4
-J
-2.
-1
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr"1)
Figure 3-6. Concentration increase in the cloud layer of a
conservative tracer assuming a mixing ratio of
60 ppbv in the mixed layer and 40 ppbv in the
cloud layer for (a) explicit model, and
(b) implicit model at 20Z (case //I).
-------
109
tant tracer is assumed that experiences no production or loss during
the transport. The detrainment of the tracer into the cloud envi-
ronment is given by,
DTR(P> - $(p)[TRuU,p) - TR] (84)
where 6(p) is given by Equation (77) and the in-cloud tracer concen-
tration (a function of cloud class and pressure) is determined from
Equation (24) with TRU substituted for hu. A value of 60 ppbv is
assumed for the concentration of the tracer in the subcloud layer,
while 40 ppbv is assumed to be the cloud layer value*
Lenschow et al. (1981), inferred the in-situ production rate of
ozone to be approximately 5 ppb hr~* from an ozone budget analysis of
the boundary layer. While theoretical studies (Fishman et_ al», 1979)
—2 —1
give production rates of approximately 2 x 10 ppbv 0^ hr for the
free troposphere. Therefore, if we consider the conservative tracer
to be ozone, the effects of cloud venting could be much more signifi-
cant that in-situ production and cannot therefore be ignored in trans-
port models that are applied to sceneries where convective venting
is possible.
Figure 3-7 shows the vertical mass flux distribution for case #2.
We see that the peak value is slightly lower than that for case #1,
shown in Figure 3-4. From Table 3-1 we see that (1) the maximum
height is 3100 m less than that in case #1 and (2), the total and
cumulus cloud coverage is slightly larger than that for case #1, and
(3) the updraft area for case #2 is only slightly less than that for
case #1. Since from Equation (61) we see that, for the explicit
model, the forcing is directly proportional to the calculated updraft
-------
110
(a)
JO
£
Ul
ae
ui
or
o.
500
600
700
900
IOOQ! i i i i I I I I i i I I i i I i i i i i i i >
4- TOTAL UPWARD MASS FLUX (Mo)
x ENVIRONMENTAL MASS FLUX (0)
O LARGE-SCALE MASS FLUX (M)
-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
.-t'
MASS FLUX (mb. hr")
MA
(b)
.0
Ul
oc
to
tn
ui
or
o_
600
TOO
900
IflOQl I I I
1 1 1 1 1 1
4- TOTAL UPWARD MASS FLUX (Mu)
x ENVIRONMENTAL MASS FLUX (ty
O LARGE-SCALE MASS FLUX (M)
I I 1 I 1 1 I I i i I
-12 -10 -8-6-4-20
MASS FLUX (mb. hr"1)
4 6 8 10 12
Figure 3-7. Vertical mass flux distribution for
(a) explicit model, and (b) implicit
model at 20Z (case //2).
-------
Ill
area, we might not expect to see a great difference between the peak
values of the vertical mass flux for these two cases for the explicit
model. In fact, the results from the implicit model, whose forcing
functions are calculated independently from those for the explicit
model, show a similar reduction in the peak value of Mu from case #1
(Figure 3-4b) and case #2 (Figure 3-7b). Note also that the heat
flux value for both the implicit and explicit models in case #2
show a decrease from that in case #1. This should be expected due
to the decrease in the maximum cloud height and updraft area.
Figure 3-8 shows the cloud-base mass flux distribution for case
#2. The maximum value in Figure 3-8(a) is only slightly smaller than
that of case $1 due again to a smaller updraft area, which, for the
explicit model, implies that the forcing would be smaller. The maxi-
mum value for the implicit model, shown in Figure 3-8(b), is also less
than that in 3-5(b) due to less forcing from the observed synoptic-
scale data. The sharp decrease below 800 mb in Figure 3-8(b) is simi-
lar to that in Figure 3-5(b), hence the previous discussion of this
feature applies in this case as well.
The concentration increase of the tracer pollutant for case #2 is
shown in Figure 3-9. We see that, as in the case of Figure 3-8, th3
maximum values for the explicit model are slightly less than those
corresponding to case #1 since the cloud-top level detrainment is
based on the cloud-base mass flux, which in Figure 3-8 has been shown
to be slightly less than the corresponding values for case #1. In the
same manner, the concentration increase for Figure 3-9(b) (implicit)
is less than that for case #1 since the forcing from the synoptic-
scale is less.
-------
112
ww
a)
600
JQ
E
*-x TOO
Ul
Of.
V)
UJ
Of.
OL
too
1000
_
X
+
-
. 1,1,1,1,1,
t 2 J
mB(p) (day" )
& 6
(b)
900
600
700
UJ
a:
3
V)
W
UJ
oc
a.
900
1000
mB(p) (day"1)
Figure 3-8, Cloud-base mass flux distribution mjj(p) for
(a) explicit model, and (b) implicit model
at 20Z (case //2).
-------
113
MW
(a)
600
v^ 700
Ul
MO
en "^
Ul
or
a.
900
1000
••
500
(b)
600
JD
v-* TOO
PRESSURE
§
900
1000
••
-
-
i • i i i i i ,
+ CLOUD OETRAINMENT
Nt
•X
1 . 1 . 1 . 1 .
5-4-3-2-1012345
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr~1)
•
-
•
-
i . r . i . i .
•f CLOUD DETRAINMENT
+ + + * : H
I . I . I , I
S -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 45
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr'1)
Figure 3-9. Concentration increase for the same conditions of
Figure 3-6 for (a) explicit model, and
(b) implicit model at 20Z (case //2).
-------
114
Figure 3-10 shows the vertical mass flux distribution for case #3.
We see from Table 3-1 that the cumulus cloud coverage, maximum cloud-
top height, updraft area and heat flux (for both the implicit and
explicit models) is the least of all three cases, hence it is not
surprising that Mu, calculated from both the implicit and explicit
methods, is also the least of all three cases. An Interesting
feature is shown in Figure 3-10(b) in that the vertical updraft mass
flux increases slightly in magnitude from 830-810 mb in the implicit
model. From the meaning of Mu (Equation 82) one would expect that Mu
would always increase with increasing pressure. However, if the
contribution to the updraft mass flux for clouds with detrainment
levels below a certain pressure is small, then the total upward mass
flux (Mu) in this region will vary according to n(X,p), which is
given by Equation (20). This however, is an explanation of how the
model has treated the given input data. The question of whether or
not the forcing functions, as determined from the input data, have
adequately accounted for all of the physical processes influencing
the cloud field at this shallow level remains unanswered and will be
the subject of a future work.
In comparing the results of Figure 3-11 with those of Figure 3-8
(for case #2) and Figure 3-5 (for case #1) we see that as in the case
of determining Mu for case #3 (Figure 3-10) the values of mjj(p) shown
in Figure 3-11 are the least of all three cases. The sharp decrease
in mg(p) below the maximum value in Figure 3-ll(b) for the implicit
model is more striking than the corresponding decreases in Figures
3-5(b) and 3-8(b) and is a result of much lower values for the syn-
optic-scale forcing at this location. As previously mentioned,
-------
115
(a)
.O
+~S
UJ
eg
13
V)
I/)
Ul
OH
a.
500
600
700
800
900
lOOO
+ TOTAL UPWARD MASS FLUX (Mu)
x ENVIRONMENTAL MASS FLUX (B{|
Q URGE-SCALE MASS FLUX (15)
t I I I I I I l_ I _L I I I I I I I I I I I
-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2
10 12
MASS FLUX (mb. hr"1)
500
(b)
JQ
E
»«x
Ul
3
Ul
cc
0.
600
700
+ TOTAL UPWARD MASS FLUX (M0)
x ENVIRONMENTAL MASS FLUX (H)
O URGE-SCALE MASS FLUX (M)
x
x
900
IOOQl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-12 -10 -8-6-4-20 2 4 6 8 10 12
MASS FLUX (mb, hrTT)
Figure 3-10. Vertical mass flux distribution for (a) explicit
model, and (b) implicit model at 20Z (case #3).
-------
116
(a)
JO
v-*
Ul
ui
Q£
a.
(b)
JQ
£
Ul
a:
to
ui
ce
a.
600
700
800
too
1000
500
600
700
800
900
1000
(
-
-
4-
4>
.1.1.1,1.1.
0 I 2 3 4 5 <
mB(p) (day'1)
-
-
+
.1.1.1.1.1.
> 1 2 3 4 5 6
-v
Figure 3-11. Cloud-base mass flux distribution mg(p) for
(a) explicit model, and (b) implicit model
at 20Z (case #3).
-------
117
the forcing functions for the implicit model at this level of the
cloud depth are somewhat dubious. The results from the explicit
model (Figure 3-1la) however, indicate the same close relationship to
the cloud cover distribution as seen for cases til and #2.
Figure 3-12 shows the concentration increase (ppbv hr~"*) as a
function of pressure over the depth of the cumulus cloud field for
case #3 (weak convection). We again see that the greatest concentra-
tion increase for the explicit model (Figure 3-12a) is associated
with the shallowest clouds and decreases with decreasing pressure in
proportion to the decrease in cumulus cloud cover shown in Figure
3-12(b). The now familiar feature of a sharp decrease just below
the maximum value is again evident, resulting from the previously
mentioned ambiguities in the dXp/dp profile and the forcing functions
at these levels.
From the Figures 3-5, 3-8 and 3-11 we see that the value of dXp/dp
at lower levels can have a substantial influence on the resulting
values of mg(p) and hence the detrainment values. This implies that
a careful selection of X is required. However, the values of X for
at least the shallowest clouds may be difficult to determine accurately
since 1.) the profile of temperature and moisture are spatially inter-
polated from rawinsonde data and hence do not reflect the influence
that cumulus clouds have had on the environment between observations,
and 2.) the entraining plume model for shallow clouds may not be
adequate since it only allows detrainment at the cloud top. In regards
to the first point, progress may be made if it is accepted that the
correlations between Figures 3-1(a) and (b), 3-2(a) and (b), and 3-3(a)
and (b) mentioned earlier are more than fortuitous, in which case, a
-------
118
(a)
.0
E
UJ
Q.
600
700
800
900
tooo
-
.• "
-
! . 1 . 1 . 1 •
+ CLOUD DETRAINMENT
X
4-
I . I . i . i
-5-4-3-2-1 0 t 2 3 4 9
-1'
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr"1)
500
(b)
JO
. E
x_x
UJ
o:
ui
oc
a.
600
700
800
900
toooL.
-s
-4 -3 -2 -1
4- CLOUD DETRAINMENT
CONCENTRATION INCREASE (ppbv hr'1)
• 5
Figure 3-12. Concentration increase for the same conditions of
Figure 3-6 for (a) explicit model, and
(b) implicit model at 20Z (case #3).
-------
119
future work may try to employ the profile of cumulus cloud cover in
determining the various X^ and hence dXp/dp. Such an advance would
greatly enhance the ability of either the explicit or implicit model to
reflect subgrid-scale variations. The problem raised by the second
point above problem may be alleviated somewhat by incorporating side
detrainment into the calculations at least for shallow clouds.
Johnson (1977) estimated that for the cases he studied, incorpora-
ting the affect of side detrainment into the calculations, reduced the
overall mass flux by 152 - 20%, while shifting the cloud base mass
flux distribution to give more influence to the taller clouds and less
to the shallower ones. Since the inclusion of the process of side
detrainment slightly increases the instability of the solution
(Johnson, personal communication), it was decided that in order to
adequately evaluate the model's performance, such instabilities
should be avoided at this time. Hence, the inclusion of this process
is left for a future task. Even if this factor was to be taken into
account, we can see from Figures 3-6, 3-9 and 3-12 that a significant
amount of pollutant can be vented from the boundary layer by convec-
tive clouds.
•
We have also seen that, especially for the implicit model in case
#3, the large-scale forcing functions may not be adequate to determine
the cloud field and its characteristics. This problem may be over-
come, however, by determining an analogous *Q' term for clouds due
to boundary layer forcing and superimposing this onto the profile of
Ql~ Q£~ QR« It should be noted at this point that although the forcing
functions used in the implicit model are devoid of subsynoptic-scale
influences, the final model results are not. As mentioned in the
-------
120
discussion of Equation (34) the maximum observed cloud-top height for
each grid cell is used to limit the maximum vertical extent attained by
the model derived cloud field for that cell. In this way, sub-grid
scale influences are introduced into the formulation of the implicit
model. This variation can be seen from the results of the implicit
model for the three cases considered in this chapter and is such that
the total upward mass flux, Mu, is directly proportional to the verti-
cal development of the cloud field.
The explicit model presented in this work, offers an additional
degree of freedom over the implicit model in that for the hypothetical
situation of 2 cases with equal vertical development, the larger value
of Mu would be associated with the case having the larger computed
updraft area. This additional degree of freedom may, however, be a
mixed blessing since the manner in which the updraft area is calculated
from the data of Deardorff et_ ai. (1980) is not only a sensitive calcu-
lation, as the results of the next chapter will show, but it is at
best a first approximation to a very complicated process. To think
that the equation giving a is universal in time and space may be
naive. It is interesting to note that the calculated values of a are
well within the expected range of only a 'few* percent of the total
area (Johnson, 1975; Zipser and LeMone, 1980). A further refinement of
this parameterization may be possible as results from the BLX83 study
(Stull, personal communication) become available.
As in the problems mentioned above, in regards to the Implicit
model, the Inability of the rawinsonde data to resolve the effects
that a convective cloud field has on the environmental temperature
and moisture fields in both space and time may cause the calculated
-------
121
value of rc(X^) (Equation 59) to be inaccurate. This is because the
temperature and moisture differences between the updraft and environ-
ment are used in the calculation of Fc(Xj[). In addition, the
methodology for determining the updraft temperature and moisture is
determined from the entraining plume theory, which, as previously
mentioned, may be inadequate for small clouds. Other uncertainties
also exist. The equation for the half-life of each cloud class is
highly empirical and if in error, it will probably give slightly high
values. The assumption that the ratio of updraft area to total cumulus
coverage is not a function of cloud class (Equation 54) may also place
severe restrictions on the explicit model's ability to accurately
simulate the physical process of cloud venting. However, until observa-
tional data can be obtained to either verify or refute this assumption,
It is felt that it is a' reasonable first approximation. An additional
limitation of the explicit model is that caused by a high stratus or
cirrus deck that may obscure any lower level convective clouds. As
stated in Section 2.2c, if less than 70% of the existing cloud field
was not cumulus, the frequency distribution of cloud top heights could
not be obtained. However, for the situations on which the explicit
formulation was tested in this study, it performed quite well.
In addition to the above mentioned problems, there is the concern
that the grid area over which the variables are averaged (mentioned on
page 78) may not be large enough to contain a statistically represent-
ative sample of the cumulus population. This would be most likely in
cases where cumulonimbus clouds were present. However, with the
availability of the cumulus cloud cover as a function of height, one
can proceed in the following way: 1.) combine enough adjacent grid
-------
122
cells so that the assumption of a representative sample is satisfied;
2«) do the calculations for this enlarged grid cell; 3.) using the
cumulus cloud-cover distribution for each cell, within the enlarged
cell, the fraction of the total mass flux from any one of the 'sub-
cells' can then be determined using the cloud-cover distribution,
since the cloud-base mass flux is given in terms of cloud classes
which, in turn, are classified according to cloud-top height.
Therefore, with the aid of the vertical distribution of cumulus
coverage, the computations can Include as many cells as necessary to
satisfy the stated condition after which, the partitioning of the
total cloud flux into each cell can be done.
In view of the ambiguities surrounding the determination of the
updraft area for use in the explicit model, a direct and quantitative
comparison between the absolute values obtained for the explicit and
implicit models is not possible at this time. Although the shape of
the mass flux profiles for the explicit model do tend to have a better
intuitive feel about them, since they are related to the cloud cover
distribution, a final judgement must be waived until the uncertainties
mentioned above can be resolved from additional observational programs.
The results shown here, however, do indicate a good degree of internal
consistency within each model in that more mass flux is obtained for
larger cloud fields in both models.
In spite of the uncertainties that do exist in regard to the models
utilized in this study, the results shown here indicate that satellite
data can be used to close the 'spectral gap' that is present when only
rawinsonde data is used. The final results of any such model however,
await an evaluation comparing the model results with observed data.
-------
CHAPTER 4
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The results of the two cloud venting models, tested on three case
scenarios were discussed in the previous chapter. The sensitivity of
these models to some of their input variables will be examined in this
chapter. This will be accomplished by adjusting the normally assumed
value of several parameters, whose specification appears to be the
most critical to the model's operation. A comparison of the subse-
quent model results will then be made to those normally obtained.
The first parameter choosen is the lower limit of the integral in
Equation (52) as it applies to the explicit model. This equation was
used to obtain the fractional area coverage of updraft and is repeated
here:
H2
" P " / G(Od£ (56)
ZLCL
As discussed in Section 2.5, the actual value of the lower limit used
was set above the LCL since we were interested in the updraft area
due to active clouds, instead of the sum of both active and forced
clouds. However, the actual value of distance above the LCL choosen
could not be explicitly calculated due to the lack of vertical reso-
lution in the model and the lack of adequate boundary conditions.
The value of 5 mb was chosen based on the assumptions that all
123
-------
124
forced clouds would be contained within, this distance from the cloud
base and that the satellite data probably could not resolve clouds
with a vertical extent any smaller than this so that the contribution
of their updraft area to the total should be neglected.
Test runs of the model were done to see how sensitive the model
calculations were to the actual determination of this value. The
data in Table 4-1 shows how a change in the lower limit of integration
of Equation (52) affects the determination of the fractional updraft
area, heat flux and total upward mass flux (Mu).
Table 4-1
integration
limit
mb.
above LCL
0.0
5.0
10.0
fractional
updraft area
.2288
.0671
.0120
total
cloud-base
heat flux
W m~2
849.
249.
45.
MU
mb. hr~*
33.7
9.9
1.8
Table 4-1. Sensitivity analysis of the explicit model to the
selection of the lower limit of integration in
Equation (52).
It is therefore evident that the operation of the explicit model
is very sensitive to the specifications of the lower limit. Such a
sensitivity may pose a severe limitation as to the applicability of
this model in an operational sense.
Another parameter pertaining to the explicit model that was chosen
for analysis was the parameter TMN involved in the calculation of the
cloud's half-life appearing in Equation (60). This parameter gives an
-------
125
approximate minimum bound for the calculation (depending on the
environmental conditions) the value of which was adjusted from 15
to 10 min for the purposes of this analysis. Table 4-2 shows the
results of the explicit model for this, test case.
Table 4-2
total
cloud-base
LMN heat flux Mu
min W m~2 mb. hr""*
15 249. 9.9
10 285. 11.3
Table 4-2. Sensitivity analysis of the explicit model to the
selection of the approximate minimum bound for the
determination of cloud half-lives.
As shown in Table 4-2, the results of the explicit model are not
highly sensitive to the value of LMN in that a decrease of LMN of 33%
resulted in an increase of only ~14% for Mu. An increase in Mu for a
decrease in LMN should be expected since this implies a faster genera-
tion rate for the clouds, hence more mass will be vented from the
subcloud layer in a given time.
Table 4-3 illustrates the sensitivity of the explicit model to a
variation in AH/Z^. The results of this analysis indicate that for a
constant Z^, as AH decreases (increases), Mu decreases (increases).
For a 20% reduction in AH/Z^, from a mid-range value of 0.25, Mu
decreases by 29%; whereas a 20% increase in AH/Z^ results in a 24%
increase in Mu. This is within acceptable limits. The data from
Tables 4-1 and 4-3 therefore indicate that the explicit model is much
-------
126
more sensitive to the selection of the lower limit of integration for
Equation (52) than to the depth of AH.
Table 4-3
AH/Zi
^
0.20
0.25
0.30
fractional
updraft area
.0536
.0753
.0931
Total
cloud-base
heat flux
199.
279.
346.
MU
mb hr~l
7.89
11.09
13.72
Table 4-3. Sensitivity analysis of the explicit model to the
selection of AH/Z^.
The final parameter tested that is strictly applicable to the ex-
plicit model was the cloud cover distribution used to determine the
cloud forcing functions. It was found that an increase of 10% in the
cloud cover distribution at all levels produced an Increse in Mu of
10%. This is to be expected since the cloud forcing for the explicit
model is directly proportional to the fractional cloud cover as shown
in Equation (61).
The sensitivity of the results from the implicit model to errors
in the rawlnsonde data was expolored. The test was accomplished by
shifting the rawinsonde data observed for a station within the study
area by -10 mb at all levels. Although this created a large pertur-
bation on the system, the gridding procedures used in this work, which
have been described in Section 2.2, were quite effective in smoothing
the field. The resulting value of Mu from this test was only ~37%
less than that obtained in an unperturbated state. This is an ex-
tremely moderate change in Mu in view of the large perturbation that
-------
127
was placed on the system. The results of this test would seem to indi-
cate that the effects of small errors present in the rawinsonde data
would be minimized as a result of the data preparation techniques
employed in this study.
Table 4-4 presents the results of altering the vertical profile of
several parameters important to the implicit model by the amount indi-
cated. The data for the unperturbated or standard case are taken from
a randomly chosen cell in the domain.
Table 4-4
variable
QR
Qi
Q2
dXD/dp
qj.
% altered
-10%
10%
10%
10% -
10%
Mu
1
mb hr-1
(standard)
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.42S
Mu
mb hr"1
(perturbed)
9.293
9.588
10.073
8.449
9.655
% change
inMu
-1.4
1.7
6.9
10.4
2.4
Table 4-4. Sensitivity analysis of the implicit model to the
profiles of QR, Qi, 0.2, dXp/dp and q^.
Of the parameters tested, Table 4-4 shows that the operation of
the model is most sensitive to the profile of dXo/dp. This sensitivity
was also mentioned in Chapter 3 in regard to the determination of
the cloud-top detrainment of a conservative tracer. Due to these
analyses, care should therefore be taken when determining d\D/dp so
that a smooth profile is obtained. Table 4-4 shows that the next
most sensitive parameter in the calculation is the determination of
Q2, which was defined in Section 2.4 to be the 'apparent moisture
sink1 of moisture from the large scale due to cumulus clouds.
-------
128
However, the relative sensitivities of Q2, QI and QR shown in Table 4-4
are actually only valid for the environmental conditions existing at
the time and location for which the model was run and should not,
therefore be taken to be universal* The larger sensitivity to Q£
should therefore be interpreted to mean that for this particular
location, 0.2 dominated Q} and QR as a cloud forcing term. The re-
maining parameter mentioned in Table 4-4 is the liquid-water mixing
ratio q£. Although q& is important in determining cloud-top height
of a given cloud class (Johnson, 1975), the model's operation is
apparently more sensitive to other parameters.
A budget analysis showing the relative magnitude of the terms
comprising Qj and 0,2 given by Equations (41) and (42) respectively,
is presented in Table 4-5. By examining this budget equation we may
be able to determine which, if any terms could be neglected.
Table 4-5
mb 3s s(V»V) V»Vs s3(J a>3s 3q q(V«V) V«Vq
3t " 3p 3p 3t " 3p 3p
700 -.68 87.62 0.85 -89.71 -2.36 5.59 -2.92 -7.11 2.97 -3.82
800 -1.71 98.53 3.27 -80.90 -0.25 -2.63 -6.13 -7.58 5.05 0.16
Table 4-5. A budget analysis for the terms comprising QI and 0.2
as given by Equations (41) and (42) respectively.
The data are taken from that of case #1 at 700 and
800 mb. Units: °K day""1.
In order to obtain the large-scale forcing, as given in Equation
(43), we subtract 0.2 from Qj. As evidenced by the 700 mb data in Table
4-5, the result would be a small difference between two large numbers,
with the difference of 1.01 being on the order of the smallest entry in
-------
129
Table 4-5 for that level. This would be an unsatisfactory situation
if it were not for the fact that the two terms with the largest mag-
nitudes (opposite in sign) are related by the continuity equation
Vh.y + 3u-0 (12)
such that the magnitude of one term influences the magnitude of the
other. The data from Table 4-5 indicate that Qj - 0.2 for 800 mb is
much larger than that for the 700 mb level. However, in view of the
small values of Qj - 0.2 near the top of the cloud field, it is
suggested that none of the terms in the above budget analysis be
neglected.
Another observation that should be made at this point is the im-
portance of the term s3u/3p in determining the value of Qj. Since
the dry static energy (s) is a large number (~300), care must be
taken to obtain a smooth profile of 3u/3p, otherwise erratic values
of Qi will result.
As mentioned in Section 2.2a, the values for 3s/3t and 3q/3t were
the result of a linear interpolation in time. In view of the fact
that the magnitude of these terms can at times be comparable to the
total forcing (Q]^ - Q2 ~ QR)> future research efforts may need to
incorporate a more accurate determination of these local time deriva-
tives.
Johnson (1975) found that radiative cooling played a larger role
in accurately determining flux quantities in the tropics than in the
sub-tropics. However, for the scenarios studied in this work, the
convective activity was much less than that observed in Johnson's
(1975) sub-tropical case study. As a result, there were many instances
-------
130
where the role of radiative cooling could not be considered to be
insignificant, especially for shallow cloud fields. In such instances
the profile of radiative cooling rates used in this work is admittedly
a crude approximation. Pollutant mass flux computations in these
cases may be in error by a factor of 2-3« Future research efforts
focusing on scenarios with similar convective patterns as those
examined in this work should involve a determination of the radiative
cooling profile that is influenced by the existing cloud cover.
The sensitivity of the explicit and implicit models to various
parameters has been discussed in this chapter. It was determined
that the explicit model, as it is presently configured, is probably
too sensitive to its input parameters -to be employed as an operational
model. The sensitivity of the implicit model to its various input
parameters however, does seem to be acceptable if care is exercised
in determining the gridded fields required as input and in determining
the vertical derivatives of X and u>.• More sophisticated methods of
determining the local time derivatives of the dry static energy and
specific humidity should be explored in future works, as well as
efficient methods for determining radiative cooling rates based on
observed cloud cover instead of using a universal profile.
-------
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Two models have been described that present a formalism for
assessing the role that a convective cloud field has on the vertical
redistribution of pollutant species vented from the boundary layer.
The first model, adapted from Johnson (1975), implicitly assumes the
existence of a cloud field If the atmosphere is conditionally unstable
and derives the forcing functions for the cloud field solely from
synoptic-scale rawinsonde data and tabulated radiational cooling
data. This model has been labeled the 'implicit' approach in this
work. The second model uses the vertical distribution of cumulus
cloud cover, as determined from satellite data, to determine the
cloud forcing functions, thereby explicitly incorporating features
•of the existing cloud field into the model calculations in a dynamic
way. This model has therefore been labeled the 'explicit' approach
in this work. Both models assume that the cloud field can be parti-
tioned into cloud classes based on cloud-top height and that each
cloud class can be appropriately described by a characteristic updraft
uniquely identified by an entralnment rate. It was also assumed
that the model of an entraining plume was able to adequately depict
the updraft characteristics of each cloud class. The cloud-base
mass flux for each cloud class was then determined by solving a
Volterra integral equation which connects the convective-scale
131
-------
132
fluxes for each cloud class with the large-scale forcing function
profile that is provided. Therefore, the two models described and
evaluated in this report differ only in the manner in which the cloud
forcing functions were derived. The major accomplishments and pro-
blems encountered in this work will now be discussed, as well as a
view towards future research needs.
Prior to this work there had been no model available to determine
the vertical redistribution of a pollutant tracer due to cumulus con-
vection for use in an operational regional-scale model. This work
•
presents a formalism for providing two such models. This formalism,
embodied in the explicit and implicit approaches, can be seen as a
tool which has led to a better understanding of the complex problem of
cloud venting. Especially helpful was the use of satellite data in
the depiction of subsynoptic scale phenomena and how this phenomena
influences cloud-base pollutant flux calculations as determined by
the explicit model which is unique to this study. The subsynoptic
scale phenomena, which was not incorporated in the forcing functions
for the implicit model, appeared to be reflected in the more realistic
shape of the cloud-top detrainment profiles, shown in Chapter 3, for
the explicit model, since the cloud forcing was assumed to be propor-
tional to the cumulus cloud cover. However, the actual amount of
pollutant detrained from the clouds was difficult to obtain with any
certainty due to the sensitivities involved. The implicit model on
the other hand, appeared to be much more reliable than the explicit
model and may contain the flexibility needed to incorporate subsyn-
optic-scale influences into its formalism as part of future research
efforts.
-------
133
The results of the sensitivity analysis presented in Chapter 4
of this work indicated that the operational use of the explicit model
proposed in this work is dependent on future research efforts in at
least three areas. First, further study on the concept of an entrain-
ment zone to see how the distribution function given in Equation
(53) varies in space and time is needed. The effects of the stabil-
ity of the overlying layer on this distribution function for various
conditions also needs to be determined more precisely. Secondly,
more observations on the life-time of cumulus clouds, especially
In relationship to the rate of entralnment and the environmental
moisture content need to be made. Finally, observations of the ratio
of updraft area to total cumulus area need to be made for varying cloud
sizes and for various times in their life cycle.
It was Indicated by the results shown in Chapter 3 that the con-
tribution of the cloud-base mass flux due to shallow clouds may be
over-estimated as a result of the assumption that clouds detrain only
at their cloud tops. This follows directly from the entraining plume
theory. A better depiction of the cloud-base mass flux may be obtained
In future works by incorporating side detrainment at least for the
shallower clouds. It has also been suggested in Chapter 3 that the
profile of fractional cumulus coverage may be able to be used to det-
ermine dXo/dp and hence invoke a stronger influence of subsynoptic
scale effects, via satellite data, on the results of either model.
Although the two models considered in this report differ in the
manner in which they determine the cloud scale forcing, both rely on
temperature and moisture data that has been interpolated spatially
and temporally from rawinsonde data. This implies that the effects
-------
134
that the cumulus cloud field has had on the environment between obser-
vations (in both a spatial and temporal sense) is implicitly neglected
in the computations. Future works along this line may need to incor-
porate actual temperature and moisture profiles as determined from
satellite observations.
In spite of the abovementioned areas that need future research,
this study has provided two methods by which satellite data can be used
to incorporate the subscale effects of cumulus clouds into regional-
scale transport models. In what has been called the implicit approach,
the vertical cloud development is limited by the satellite observed
value, but the cloud forcing is determined solely from synoptic-scale
rawinsonde data. In the second, or explicit approach, the vertical
development is similarly limited, but the satellite data is dynamically
Incorporated into the determination of the cloud forcing functions.
The two models give internally consistent results for varying condi-
tions and give similar results for the total convective upward mass
flux (MU). The manner in which the upward mass flux is apportioned
to the various cloud classes, however, differs for the two models
and is shown to affect the vertical profile of detrainment for a
conservative tracer. This is seen as a consequence of the vertical
profile of forcing functions used in the respective models. For the
examples shown in this study, the explicit model gave more reasonable
looking profiles since the forcing functions were related to the
observed profile of cumulus cloud cover. The close agreement mentioned
above for the calculated Mu values between the two approaches must,
however, be viewed with caution. Until further observational data
are made available, which will enable the uncertainties inherent in
-------
135
this approach to be better known, the sensitivity of this model to
Its required input may preclude it from being used in an operational
manner. It has also been shown that regardless of the method chosen,
the concentration increase in the cloud-layer due to the venting action
of cumulus clouds can be as, if not more important than the in-situ
production of some species and should therefore not be neglected in
regional-scale transport models for sceneries involving convective
cloud fields.
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
136
-------
137
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arakawa, A* and Schubert, W. H., Interaction of a cumulus cloud en-
semble with the large-scale environment, Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 31,
674-701, 1974
Baboolal, L. B., Pruppacher, H. R. and Topalian, J. H., A sensitivity
study of a theoretical model of SC>2 scavenging by water drops in air,
J. Atmos. Sci.. 38, 856-870, 1981
Barnes, S. L., A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather
map analysis, J. Appl. Meteor., ^, 396-409, 1964
Barnes, S. L., Mesoscale objective map analysis using weighted time-
series observations, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL NSSL-62, 1973
Bates, J. R., Tropical disturbances and the general circulation,
. R. Met. Soc.. 98, 1-16, 1972
. J. L., Vender Haar, T. H. and Laybe, P., Determination for
cloud parameters for NEROS II from digital satellite data, Draft
Report EPA Contract No. 68-02-3731, 1983
Bellamy, J. C., Objective calculations of divergence, vertical vel-
ocity and vorticity, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 30, 45-49, 1949
Betts, A. K., A composite mesoscale cumulonimbus budget, J. Atmos.
Sci.. 30, 597-610, 1973a
Betts, A. K., Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameter-
ization, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc.. 99. 178-196, 1973b
Betts, A. K., Modeling subcloud layer structure and interaction with
a shallow cumulus layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 33. 2363-2382, 1976
Bjerknes, J., Saturated-adiabatic ascent of air through dry-
adibatically descending environment, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc., 64. 325-
330, 1938
Browell, E. V., Carter, A. F., Shipley, S. T., Allen, R. J., Butler,
C. P., Mayo, M. N., Siviter, J. H., Jr. and Hall, W. M., NASA multi-
purpose airborne DIAL system and measurements of ozone and aerosol
profiles, Appl. Optics. 22_, 522-534, 1983
-------
138
Bullock, 0. R., Spatial and temporal interpolation of NEROS radiosonde
winds, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Report, Research
Triangle Park, N. C., 1983
Carson, D. J., The development of a dry inversion-capped convectively
unstable boundary, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc., 99, 450-467, 1973
Chameides, W. L. and Stedman, D. H., Tropospheric ozone: coupling
transport and photochemistry, J. Geophys. Res.. 82, 1787-1794, 1977
Charney, J. G. and Eliassen, A., On the growth of the hurricane
depression, J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 68-75, 1964
Chatfield, R. B., 1982, Remote tropospheric sulfur-dioxide: Cloud
transport of reactive sulfur emissions, Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State
University, 227 p.
Chen, C-H. and Orville, H. D., Effects of mesoscale convergence on
cloud convection, J. Appl. Meteor.. 19, 256-274, 1980
Cho, H-R. and Ogura, Y., A relationship between cloud activity and the
low-level convergence as observed in Reed-Recker's composite easterly
waves, J. Atmos. Sci.. JU, 2058-2065, 1974
Clarke, J. F., Ching, J. K. S., Clark, T. L. and Posseil, N. C.,
Regional-scale pollutant studies in the northeastern United States,
Atmos. Environment, 1983 (in press)
Cressman, G. P., The influence of the field of horizontal divergence on
convective cloudiness, J. Meteor., 3i.» 83-88, 1946
Deardorff, J. W., Comments "On the interaction between the subcloud and
cloud layers in tropical regions", J. Atmos. Sci.. 32. 2363-2364, 1975
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E. and Stockton, B. H., Laboratory studies
of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer, J. Fluid Mech.,
100, 41-64, 1980
Dopplick, T. G., Global radiative heating of the earth's atmosphere,
Ref. No. 24, Planetary Circulations Project, Dept. of Meteorology,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 128 p.
Eliassen, A., Hov, 0., Isaksen, I. S. A., Saltbones, J. and Stordal,
F., A Lagrangian long-range transport model with atmospheric boundary
layer chemistry, J. Appl. Meteor., 21, 1645-1661, 1982
Emmitt, G. D., Tropical cumulus interaction with and modification of
the subcloud region, J. Atmos. Sci.. 35, 1485-1502, 1978
Endlich, R. M. and Clark, J. R., Objective computation of some
meteorological quantities, J. Appl. Meteor., 2_t 66-81, 1963
-------
139
Flshman, J., Solomon, S. and Crutzen, P., Observational and theoretical
evidence in support of a significant in-situ photochemical source of
tropospheric ozone, Tellus, 31. 432-446, 1979
Fraederich, K., A mass budget of an ensemble of transient cumulus
clouds determined from direct cloud observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 33,
262-268, 1976
Fritsch, J. M. and Maddox, R. A., Convectively driven mesoscale weather
systems aloft. Part I: Observations, J. Appl. Meteor.. 20. 9-19, 1981a
Fritsch, J. M. and Maddox, R. A., Convectively driven mesoscale weather
systems aloft. Part II: Numerical simulations, J. Appl. Meteor., 20,
20-26, 1981b
Gidel, L. T., Cumulus cloud transport of transient tracers, J. Geophys.
Res.. 88, 6587-6599, 1983
Greenhut, G. K., Ching, J. K. S., Pearson, R., Jr. and Repoff, T. P.,
Transport of ozone by turbulence and clouds in an urban boundary layer,
Submitted to J. Geophys. Res., 1983
Johnson, R. H., 1975, The role of convective-scale precipitation
downdrafts in cumulus-synoptic-scale interactions, Ph.D. thesis,
University of Washington, 136 p.
Johnson, R. H., The role of convective-scale precipitation downdrafts
in cumulus and synoptic-scale interactions, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1890-
1910, 1976
Johnson, R. H., The effects of cloud detrainment on the diagnosed
properties of cumulus populations, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 359-366, 1977
Johnson, R. H., Characteristic structure and growth of the non-
precipitating cumulus layer over South Florida, Mon. Wea. Rev., 106,
1495-1504, 1978
Johnson, R. H., Diagnosis of convective and mesoscale motions during
Phase III of GATE, J. Atmos. Sci.. 3T_, 733-753, 1980
Johnson, W. B., Interregional exchange of air pollution: Model types
and application, J. A. P. C. A.. 33. 563-574, 1983
Kitchen, M. and Caughey, S. J., Tethered-balloon observations of the
structure of small cumulus clouds, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc., 107, 853-
874, 1981
Kuo, H. L., On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones
through latent heat release by cumulus convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 22,
40-63, 1965
-------
140
Kuo, H. L., Further studies of the parameterization of the influence
of cumulus convection on large-scale flow, J. Atmos. Sci«, 31,
1232-1240, 1974
Lamb, R., A regional scale (1000 km.) model of photochemical air
pollution - Part I: Theoretical formulation, U. S. Envrionmental
Protection Agency Technical Report, Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1983
Lenschow, D., Pearson, R., Jr. and B. Stankov, Estimating the ozone
budget in the boundary layer by use of aircraft measurements of ozone
eddy flux and mean concentration, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 7291-7297,
1981
Lewis, J. M., Test of the Ogura-Cho model on a prefrontal squall line
case, Mon. Wea. Rev.. 103. 764-778, 1975
Liu, S. C., Possible effects on tropospheric 03 and OH due to NO
emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 4^ 325-328, 1977
Lopez, R. E., The lognormal distribution and cumulus cloud populations,
Mon. Wea. Rev.. 105. 865-872, 1977
Manabe, S. and Strickler, R. F., Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere
with a convective adjustment, J. Atmos'. Sci.. 21. 361-365, 1964
Manins, P. C., The daytime planetary boundary layer: A new interpre-
tation of Wangara data, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc.. 108, 689-705, 1982
Morton, B. R., Buoyant plumes in a moist atmosphere, J. Fluid Mech., 2,,
127-144, 1957
Nitta, T., Observational determination of cloud mass flux distri-
butions, J. Atmos. Sci.. 32. 73-91, 1975
Ogura, Y. and Cho, H-R., Diagnostic determination of cumulus cloud
populations from observed large-scale variables, J. Atmos. Sci., J30_,
1276-1286, 1973
Ogura, Y. and Cho, H-R., On the interaction between the subcloud and
cloud layers in tropical regions, J. Atmos Sci.. 31, 1850-1859, 1974
Ogura, Y., Russell, J. and Cho, H-R., A semi-empirical model of the
trade-wind inversion, J. Met. Soc. Japan. 55. 209-220, 1977
Ooyama, K., A dynamical model for the study of tropical cyclone
development, Geofis. Intern., 4^ 187-198, 1964
Ooyama, K., A theory on parameterization of cumulus convection, J.
Met. Soc. Japan. 4£, 744-756, 1971
Orville, H. D., Ambient wind effects on the initiation and development
of cumulus clouds over mountains, J. Atmos. Sci., 25, 385-403, 1968
-------
**&
*ec
, a-*0 3>
*. ^V^>f>
«^*' «.*-.^f" e<^
^T^C-^5' -
j«» i^.» \>."
•i^j
a^6^' ^ ^S0.< £
V5" c.^>^V
c,e<\ a5\<
Oi "
-------
/*£'' *. r*^ ^/' C5 ^iX/ ,
«^^0;^^;,v, ^
-------
-------
-------
141
Pielke, R., A three-dimensional numerical model of the sea breezes over
south Florida, Mon. Wea. Rev., 102. 115-139, 1974
Pitts, D. E., Reeser, W. K. and Mendlowitz, M. A., Equivalent blackbody
temperature of the top of a severe storm, J. Appl. Meteor., 14, 609-
618, 1975
Reynolds, D. W. and Vonder Haar, T. H., A bispectral method for cloud
parameter determination, Mon. Wea. Rev., j. 05, 446-457, 1977
Reed, R. J. and Recker, E. J., Structure and properties of synoptic-
scale wave disturbances in the equatorial western Pacific, J. Atmos.
Sci., 28_, 1117-1133, 1971
Riehl, H. and Malkus, J. S., On the heat balance in the equatorial
trough zone, Geophysica, £, 503-538, 1958
Riehl, H. and Malkus, J. S., Some aspects of hurricane Daisy, 1958,
Tellus. _13_, 181-213, 1961
Rodhe, H. and Crutzen, P., Formation of sulfuric and nitric acid in the
atmosphere during long-range transport, Tellus, 33, 132-141, 1981
Samson, P. J. and Ragland, K. W., Ozone and visibility reduction in the
Midwest: Evidence for large-scale transport, J. Appl. Met., 16, 1101-
1106, 1977
Schaefer, J. T. and Doswell, C. A., Ill, On the interpolation of a
vector field, Mon. Wea. Rev.. 107. 458-476, 1979
Scorer, R. S* and Ludlam, F. H., Bubble theory of penetrative
convection Quart. J. R. Met. Soc., pp. 79, 94, 1953
Seguin, W. R. and Garstang, M., Some evidence of the effects of convec-
tion on the structure of the tropical subcloud layer, J. Atmos. Sci.,
33, 660-666, 1976
Simpson, J., On cumulus entrainment and one-dimensional models, J.
Atmos. Sci., ^8, 449-455, 1971
Spicer, C. W., Joseph, D. W., Sticksel, P. R. and Ward, G. F., Ozone
sources and transport in the northeastern United States, Environ. Sci.
and Tech.. 1J5, 975-985, 1979
Squires, E., Penetrative downdraughts in cumuli, Tellus, 10, 381-389,
1958
Squires, P. and Turner, J. S., An entraining jet model for cumulonimbus
updraughts, Tellus. XIV, 422-434, 1962
Stommel, H., Entrainment of air into a cumulus cloud, J. Meteor., 4^,
91-94, 1947
-------
142
Stommel, H., Entrainment of air Into a cumulus cloud II, J. Meteor., 8,
127-129, 1951
Stull, R. B., Fair-weather cumulus cloud forecasting using an opera-
tional boundary-layer model, personal communication
Vaughan, W. M., Chan, M., Cantrell, B. and Pooler, F., A study of per-
sistent elevated pollution episodes in the northeastern United States,
Bull. Am. Met. Soc.. £3, 258-266, 1982
White, V. H., Anderson, J. A., Blumenthal, D. L., Husar, R. B.,
Gillani, N. V. and Husar, J. D., Wilson, W. E., Jr., Formation and
transport of secondary air pollutants: Ozone and aerosols in the St.
Louis urban plume, Science. 194, 187-189, 1976
Wolff, G. T., Lioy, P. J., Meyers, R. E., Cederwall, R. T., Wight, G.
D., Pasceri, R. E. and Taylor, R. S., Anatomy of two ozone transport
episodes in*the Washington D. C. to Boston, Massachusetts corridor,
Environ. Sci. and Tech.. JJ, 506-510, 1977
Warner, J., The water content of cumuliform cloud, Tellus. 7_, 449-457,
1955
Warner, J., On steady-state one-dimensional models of cumulus convec-
tion, J. Atmos. Sci.. 27, 1035-1040, 1970
Yanai, M., Esbensen, S. and Chu, J-H., Determination of bulk properties
of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budgets,
J. Atmos. Sci.. _3jO, 611-627, 1973
. Yanai, M., Chu, J-H., Stark, T. and Nitta, T., Response of deep and
shallow tropical maritime cumuli to large-scale processes, J. Atmos.
Sci.. 33, 976-991, 1976
Zeman, 0., Parameterization of the dynamics of stable boundary layers
and nocturnal jets, J. Atmos. Sci.. 36, 792-804, 1979
Zipser, E. J. and LeMone, M. A., Cumulonimbus vertical velocity events
in GATE. Part II: Synthesis and model core structure, J. Atmos. Sci.,
^37, 2458-2469, 1980
-------
APPENDICIES
143
-------
144
LIST OF APPENDICES
I. A list and brief description of the files needed to
process the required data and perform the necessary
cloud-flux computations 145
II. Flow diagram of the cloud-base pollutant flux program
network 146
III. Flow diagram of the cloud-base pollutant flux module....... 147
IV. Cross-reference listing of file specifications used in
Appendix II and their corresponding file names, showing
what routine created them, and where they are subsequently
referenced ...............' ••••151
V. Listing and description of each file specified in
Appendix IV .15*3
-------
145
APPENDIX I
A list and brief description of the files needed to process the required
data and perform the necessary cloud-flux computations.
Program file Function
UAMET This program takes normally obtainable RAOB data
(in the 'NERDS' format), produces objectively
analyzed fields of the variables on each of several
pressure surfaces and interpolates the data in time.
•
INVERT This program takes the objectively analyzed fields,
on the various pressure surfaces, as determined by
UAMET, and changes the data structure so that profiles
for each variable are obtained for each small-scale
grid cell for each hour of the data.
SFCMET This program takes normally obtainable surface meteor-
ological data and performs an objective analysis to
obtain grid point values of the parameters of interest
over the grid. The data is then interpolated in time
and space to obtain a small-scale gridded field for
each variable for each hour.
SATPGH This program assimilates the cloud data provided by
CSU for each small-scale grid cell, obtains the cloud-
base height for each grid cell for each hour of data,
and determines the vertical profile of cumulus cloud
coverage.
CLDVENT This program obtains several parameters related to the
convective updraft mass flux, occurring in a given grid
cell, based on the presence of a cumulus cloud field
in the cell and the state of the environment as defined
from the objectively analyzed fields, using either the
the implicit or explicit models. For a description of
the output fields see the description of files (Appendix
V, files 37-48).
-------
CM ^
146
•a
o
a
4J
8
60
2
CL
« r-J
§
*-• |
• ^^"^N
rH ••••••» *
O Q£ 1*5 gv
0. ui _^_ ™ ~
* * S 2
OP 1 i 1 ui ui
CQ ^^^^^
,0
0
H
O
OJ
^^^^^^^
n . • • •
** irt m 10 o
O •-» CM 22
e * . . .
flj
& < S! 3 3 SS
cd • • • •
^ «M co en r*
•«• SJS S 3
J I i
^" T T
i | |
H S
5
x 3
H '-H
g T
ft T
w . i
« -^» <-^ ••
5,
*• ** *
*C "S J
e e
E u
>«— *
1
H~
Ul
§
T
A V
i '
i •
1 1
i
i •
i *
{ |«
«j
f^
§
(9
O
^^
CO
H-
U
u.
V)
T
1
> 00
^ +*
i I
»
•I
^
i
#r
b
••
^-
•
m H - >.
^
riV
i
^ *-
•* p-
O I/
•*
MM
, 1
__
*~
(T
*
f
£
t
_ U
C
N.
^
)
J
•^
3
^
J
•^
^
u
^
t
^
>
C
w
C
t
0
K
<
u
•
J
.••
a
»•
*
•»
^
h-
S
7 3
J Z
- 19
H-
„
J
v/\ r
V f^
H s
C ^""* ^^
u
j
L
^
MM
* *-, *-
% O •»
4 CM CM
* 4-» *J
i I i
cc
-•«— 2
oe
I
ae
0
u
X
a!
s
5
- Ul
i
x t
(* 1
L
C? u
s «•»
ii S
3
i , "*•
g
UJ
S
d
4>
._
-------
147
APPENDIX III
Flow diagram of the cloud-base pollutant flux module
INPUT: hour and
grid cell(s) of
interest (unit 5)
INPUT: 2-dim cloud
data (CU,C14,C16)
INPUT: surface
meteorology (S12)
INPUT: topography
(unit 3)
set 1*0, N=number of
grid cells to examine
Routine: CLDVENT.DRIVER
(explicit)
INPUT: cu eld cover
profile (C15)
-------
148
INPUT! T,q,z
(E11,E12,E13)
interpolate T,q,z
to 5 mb intervals
determine the pressure
levels corresponding to eld
base, eld top and 500 mb
(IB,IMX,INT)
JL
(determine h profile
MIETURNj
[determine eld-base h (eqn 32) |
1
set K - IB + LCTI
determine eld-top h at
level K (eqn 32)
determine entrainment rate for
elds with tops at level K (eqn 34)
I
|K • K
N
determine the number of
eld classes to be used for
K < IMX
store the entrainment rate
and eld-top presure level
for each cloud class
(RETURNj
-------
149
INPUT: vertical vel.,
Q1,Q2 (Qll)
determine hu for each eld class
(eqn 24)
interpolate u,Ql,Q2,QR
to 5 mb intervals
determine the ratio of updraft
area to total eld cover
(eqn 54)
determine the vertical
derivatives of h,X and
tracer concentration
determine the fractional
updraft area for each eld class
(eqn 55)
determine the total
updraft area (eqn 52)
1
determine the half-life for
each eld class (eqn 60)
1
determine the moisture required
for a eld in each eld class s
(eqn 59)
I
determine the bulk forcing term
as a function of eld class
(eqn 61)
determine the total integrated
bulk forcing (eqn 62)
weight the forcing at each
level according to the cu eld
cover
-------
150
determine the eld-base
heat flux (eqn 44)
solve for the spectral
distribution of eld-base
mass flux (eqn 81)
determine the induced
environmental mass flux (eqn 4)
determine the detrainment
of ozone from each eld class
determine the net mass exchange
rate of ozone at each level
RETURN J
determine the eld-base
heat flux
solve for the spectral
distribution of eld-base
mass flux
determine the induced
environmental mass flux (eqn 4)
determine the detrainment
of ozone from each eld class
determine the net mass exchange
rate of ozone at each level !
(RETURN)
-------
151
APPENDIX IV
Cross-reference listing of file specifications used in Appendix II and
their corresponding file names, showing what routine created them, and
where they are subsequently referenced.
Unit # or File
Specification
File Name
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
UNIT 4
UNIT 5
UNIT 8
UNIT 19
UNIT 20
UNIT 21
UNIT 22
UNIT 23
All
A12
A13
A14
A15
A16
A17
A18
A19
A20
A21
A22
A23
A24
Ell
E12
E13
Qll
Sll
S12
S13
Gil
C12
C14
C15
C16
Fll
Fll
SEXP1HRLY
CELLTOPO
SITESEXP1
'CARD READER1
SEXP1SFCOBS
CLDFREQPIX
CLDCOVER-TOT
CLDCOVER-CUM
CUM-AVEHGT
CUM-PKHGT
LSZSEXP1
LSTSEXP1
LSPTSEXP1
LSTDSEXP1
LSQSEXP1
LSUSEXP1
LSVSEXP1
LSWSEXP1
SEXP1DIVORT
LSAVSESEXP1
LSAVQSEXP1
LSQ1SEXP1
LSQ2SEXP1
UTILITYl
SSTSEXP1
SSQSEXP1
SSZSEXP1
SSWQ1Q2SEXP1
SEXP1SFCLG
SEXP1SFC
SEXP1SFCLGHR
SEXP1CSUCLDS
SEXP1CSUPIX
SEXP1TOTPIX
SEXP1CUMCOVD
SEXP1CLDBHTS
FLUXPARAMIMP
FLUXPARAMEXP
Created in
Routine
-t
-t
-t
.t
_t
_t
_t
.t
"_t
.t
UAMET
INVERT
SFCMET.SFCGRD
SFCMET.INTERP
H
SATPGM.CSUCLD
SATPGM.CSUPIX
SATPGM.CUDIST
SATPGM.LCL
CLDVENT
Used in Routine(s)
UAMET
SATPGM.LCL,CLDVENT
UAMET
UAMET
SFCMET.SFCGRD
SATPGM.CSUPIX
SATPGM.CSUCLD
UAMET,INVERT
m n
H
H
" ,INVERT
M
M
" .INVERT
•t
M
M
" ,INVERT
N tfl
>
M
CLDVENT
SFCMET.INTERP
SATPGM.LCL,CLDVENT
SATPGM.PIXCOR,SATPGM.
CUDIST,CLDVENT
SATPGM.CUDIST
SATPGM.PIXCOR,SATPGM.
CUD1ST,CLDVENT
CLDVENT
SATPGM.CSUPIX,CLDVENT
-------
152
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
F12
F12
F13
F13
F14
F14
Pll
Pll
P12
P12
REGRS
MBOFPIMP
MBOFPEXP
03BUDIMP
03BUDEXP
MFBUDIMP
MFBUDEXP
CBPLIMP
CBPLEXP
CSTATSIMP
CSTATSEXP
CLDVENT
* These files are assumed to be supplied by the user.
REGR* This is not an actual file, but is the output displayed on a
CRT. The required regression coefficients are to be read from
the display and inserted into routine SATPGM.CUDIST via a
data statement.
-------
153
APPENDIX V
Listing and description of each file specified in Appendix IV
File Name
1. SEXP1HRLY
2. CELLTOPO
3. SITESEXPl
4. 'CARD READER1
5. SEXP1SFCOBS
6. CLDFREQPIX
7. CLDCOVER-TOT
8. CLDCOVER-CUM
9. CUM-AVEHGT
10. CUM-PKHGT
11. LSZSEXP1
Description
Hourly RAOB data from 7/21/81 12Z through 7/23/81
12Z for stations within the lat-lon boundaries of
45° - 25° N, 91° - 60° W in NEROS format.
Grid averaged topography (M) for each grid cell in
the lat-lon region of 38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W.
Each cell has the dimensions of 1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion.
Station ID, lat, Ion and altitude (m) for each RAOB
station in the space-time window described in
SEXP1HRLY.
Hour (GMT) and grid cell(s) of interest.
Surface meteorological data from 7/22/81 12Z through
7/23/81 6Z for stations within the lat-lon boundaries
of 39° - 33° N, 82.5° - 75° W.
Frequency distribution of cloud-top heights as given
by IR pixel data for 1200 LSI through 2300 LSI for
each grid cell (1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion) within the
region of 38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. The pixel data
are given at 500 ft intervals.
Fractional cloud cover of all clouds for each grid
cell, time window given in CLDFREQPIX.
Fractional cloud cover of cumulus clouds, for each
grid cell, for the space-time window in CLDFREQPIX.
Average cumulus height, for each grid cell, for the
space-time window given in CLDFREQPIX.
Peak cumulus height, for each grid cell, for the
space-time window given in CLDFREQPIX.
Hourly geopotential height data (m) for each of the
large-scale (synoptic) grid points, at 25 mb intervals
from 500 - 1000 mb, from 7/22/81 12Z through 7/23/81
12Z, for the region bounded by 41° - 31° N, 86° -
71° W. Each grid cell has the dimensions of 2.0° lat
X 2.5° Ion.
-------
154
12. LSTSEXP1
13. LSPTSEXP1
14. LSTDSEXP1
15. LSQSEXP1
16. LSUSEXP1
17. LSVSEXP1
18. LSWSEXP1
19. SEXP1DIVORT
20. LSAVSESEXP1
21. LSAVQSEXP1
Hourly temperature data (K°) for each grid cell as
defined in the pressure-space-time window specified
in LSZSEXP1.
Hourly isentropic analysis data for the 315 K
surface for the space-time window specified in
LSZSEXP1. For each hour, the following informa-
tion given for each grid points pressure (mb), -
specific humidity (g/kg), u-corap of wind (m/s)s
v-comp of wind (m/s), Montgomery stream function (J/g>
Hourly dew-point temperature data (k) for each
grid cell as defined in the pressure-space-time
window specified in LSZSEXPl.
Hourly specific humidity data (g/kg) for each grid
cell as defined in the pressure-space-time window
specified in LSZSEXPl.
Hourly data for the u-comp of wind (m/s), for each
grid cell as defined in the space-time window
specified in LSZSEXPl, with 50 mb intervals from
500 mb to 1000 nrb.
Hourly data for the v-comp of wind (m/s) for each
grid cell as defined in the pressure-space-time
window specified in LSUSEXP1.
Hourly data for large-scale environmental vertical
velocity (mb/hr) for each grid cell as defined in
the pressure-space-time window specified in LSUSEXPl.
Hourly vorticity and divergence data (1/s) for the
space-time window specified in LSUSEXPl. At each
50 mb level from 500 mb to 1000 mb, 3 sets of
vorticity and divergence data are given for the
large-scale grid points. The first set is derived
from the initial u and v gridded wind component
data. The second set is derived from the Bel2.amy
triangle technique. The third set is derived from
the final u and v gridded data resulting from the
Schaefer-Doswell analysis.
Hourly, layer-averaged static energy data (J/g)
for each grid cell as defined in the pressure-
space-time window specified in LSUSEXPl.
Hourly, layer-averaged specific humidity data (g/kg)
for each grid cell as defined in the pressure-
space-time window specified in LSUSEXPl.
-------
155
22. LSQ1SEXP1
23. LSQ2SEXP1
24. UTILITY1
25. SSTSEXP1
26. SSQSEXP1
27. SSZSEXP1
28. SSWQ1Q2SEXP1
29. SEXP1SFCLG
30. SEXP1SFC
31. SEXP1SFCLGHR
Hourly data for each component of the large-scale
dry static energy budget (deg/day) for each grid
cell as defined in the pressure-space-time window
in LSUSEXP1.
Hourly data for each component of the large-scale
moisture budget (deg/day) for each grid cell as
defined in the pressure-space-time window in
LSUSEXP1.
Working file to facilitate the computations of Ql
and Q2.
Hourly profiles of temperature data (K) for each
of the small-scale grid cells from 7/22/81 12Z
through 7/23/81 12Z for the region bounded by
38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. Each grid cell has the
dimensions of 1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion. Data are given at
25 mb intervals from 500 pb to 1000 mb.
Hourly profiles of specific humidity data (g/kg)
for each grid cell as defined in the pressure-space-
time window specified in SSTSEXP1.
Hourly profiles of geopotential height data (m) for
each grid cell as defined in the pressure-space-time
window specified in SSTSEXP1.
Hourly data for the large-scale environmental vertical
velocity (mb/hr), Ql, and Q2 (deg/day) are given at
50 mb intervals from 500 mb to 1000 mb for each grid
cell as defined in the space-time window specified in
SSTSEXP1.
Gridded 3-hourly surface data for each grid cell for
7/22/81 12Z through 7/23/81 6Z for the region bounded
by 38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. The grid cells have
the dimensions of 1.0° lat X 1.25° Ion. The data at
each time level are: sea level press (mb), station
press (mb), u-comp of wind (m/s), v-comp of wind
(m/s), temp (K), dew-point temp (K).
Hourly surface data for each grid cell for 7/22/81
12Z through 7/23/81 6Z for the region bounded by
38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. The grid cells have the
dimensions of 1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion. The data component
given for each hour are the same as in SEXP1SFCLG.
Hourly surface data for each grid cell as defined in t
space-time window specified in SEXP1SFCLG. The data
components given for each hour are the same as in
SEXP1SFCLG.
-------
156
32. SEXP1CSUCLDS
33. SEXP1CSUPIX
34. SEXP1TOTPIX
35. SEXP1CUMCOVD
36. SEXP1CLDBHTS
37. FLUXPARAMIMP
38. FLUXPARAMEXP
39. MBOFPIMP
40. MBOFPEXP
Hourly cloud data for ech grid cell from 1200 LSI
through 2300 LST on 7/22/81 within the lat-lon
region of 38° - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. Each cell has
the dimensions of 1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion. The four
data fields, for each hour, from the files CLDCOVER
-TOT, CLDCOVER-CUM, CUM-AVEHGT, and CUM-PKHGT have
been assimilated into this one direct access file.
This is a direct acces file containing the data of
CLDFREQPIX.
Hourly, vertically integrated IR pixel counts for eacl
grid cell as defined in the space-time window of
SEXP1CSUCLDS.
Hourly profiles of the fractional cumulus cloud
coverage for each grid cell as defined in the
space-time window of SEXP1CSUCLDS. The data are
given at 500 ft intervals.
Houly cloud-base heights (msl) for each grid cell
as defined in the space-time window of SEXP1CSUCLDS.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell from 1200 LST
through 2300 LST on 7/22/81 within the bounds of
38* - 34° N, 81° - 76° W. The grid cells have dimen-
sions of 1/6° lat X 1/4° Ion. For each cloud class
determinned from the model 7 components are given:
(1) cloud-base mass flux as a function of entrainment
rate (mb-km/day). (2) entrainment rate interval
(I/km). (3) entrainment rate (I/km). (4) normalized
mass flux. (5) the derivative of the entrainment rat<
profile with respect to pressure at the cloud top
(1/km-mb). (6) incloud ozone concentrations at the
cloud top (ppbv). (7) no data given for implicit
model for this component.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The dta structure is identical
to that of FLUXPARAMIMP with the exception for componi
(7): fractional coverage of updraft area.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell in the space-
time window as defined in FLUXPARAMIMP. For each
cloud class 2 components are given: (1) cloud-top
pressure (mb). (2) cloud-base mass flux as a functioi
of cloud-top pressure (I/day).
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The data structure is identical
to that of MBOFPIMP.
-------
157
41. 03BUDIMP
42. 03BUDEXP
43. MFBUDIMP
44. MFBUDEXP
45. CBPLIHP
46. CBPLEXP
47. CSTATSIMP
48. CSTATSEXP
Hourly grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell in the space-
time window as defined in FLUXPARAMIMP. For each
cloud class 4 components are given: (1) cloud-top
pressure (mb). (2) cloud-top detrainment rate of
ozone (ppbv/hr). (3) vertical net mass exchange
rate of ozone (yg ozone/hr) at the cloud-top pressure.
(4) Induced environmental transport of ozone, at the
cloud-top pressure, caused by the upward mass flux
(ppbv/hr).
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The data structure is identical
to that of 03BUDIMP.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell in the space-
time window as defined in FLUXPARAMIMP. For each
cloud class 4 components are given: (1) cloud-top
pressure (mb). (2) total upward convective mass
flux at the cloud-top pressure (mb/hr). (3) induced
environmental mass flux at the cloud-top pressure,
caused by the upward mass flux (mb/hr). (4) large-
scale (synoptic mass flux (mb/hr) at the cloud-top
pressure (as determined from RAOB data).
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The data structure is identical
to that of MFBUDIMP.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell in the space-
time window as defined in FLUXPARAMIMP. The value of
the total net ozone exchange rate at cloud base (yg
ozone/hr) is given.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The data structure is identical
to that of CBPLIMP.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the implicit
version of CLDVENT for any grid cell in the space-
time window as defined in FLUXPARAMIMP. For each
hour, 3 data fields are given: (1) Convective cloud-
base heat flux (W/m^). (2) no data given for the
implicit model. (3) total fractional updraft area.
Hourly, grid cell averaged output from the explicit
version of CLDVENT. The data structure is identical
to that of CSTATSIMP with the exception of component
(2): ratio of updraft area to total cloud cover.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing}
1. REPORT NO.
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
THE VERTICAL REDISTRIBUTION OF A POLLUTANT TRACER
DUE TO CUMULUS CONVECTION
5. REPORT DATE
12/84 (Approved)
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
John A. Ritter and Donald H. Stedman
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
University of Michigan
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
CDWA1A/02- 0651 (FY-85)
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
CA CR807485
12. SPONSORING AGENCY_NAME AND ADDRESS.
Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory—RTF, NC
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park. North Carolina 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final (1980-84)
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/09
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Mathematical formalisms that incorporate the physical processes responsible
for the vertical redistribution of a conservative pollutant tracer due to a
convective cloud field are presented. Two modeling approaches are presented
differing in the manner in which the cloud fields are forced. In the first or
implicit approach, the vertical cloud development is limited by the satellite
observed value, and cloud forcing is determined from synoptic-scale heat and
moisture budgets. In the explicit approach, the vertical development is similarly
limited, but the forcing functions are obtained by explicitly incorporating the
vertical distribution of cumulus cloud cover, thereby dynamically incorporating the
influences of sub-synoptic scale phenomena. The two approaches give internally
consistent results and give similar results for the convective mass flux. The manner
in which the upward mass flus is apportioned to the various cloud classes, however,
differs as consequence of the different vertical profile of forcing functions used.
The explicit model gave more reasonable profiles but the predictions are highly
sensitive to input conditions. The impl icit model, was somewhat less sensitive to
its input parameters if the data are prepared judiciously. This study shows that the
concentration increase in the cloud-layer due to the venting action of cumulus clouds
can be as, if not more important than, the in-situ production and this process should
therefore be incorporated in regional-scale transport models.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Field/Group
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
IINr.l ASSTFTFH
21. NO. OF PAGES
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
UNCLASSIFIED
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------