EPA-600/1-76-019
March 1976                                   Environmental Health  Effects Research Series

-------
                     RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency,  have been grouped into
five series.   These five broad categories were established to
facilitate further  development and application of environmental
technology.   Elimination of traditional  grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer  and a maximum interface in
related fields.   The five series are:

          1.   Environmental  Health Effects Research
          2.   Environmental  Protection Technology
          3.   Ecological Research
          4.   Environmental  Monitoring
          5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has  been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS
RESEARCH series.  This series describes projects and studies re-
lating to the tolerances of man for unhealthful substances or
conditions.   This work is generally assessed from a medical view-
point, including physiological or psychological studies.   In add-
ition to toxicology and other medical  specialities, study areas
include biomedical  instrumentation and health research techniques
utilizing animals - but always with intended application to human
health measures.
This document is available to the public through the National
Technical  Information Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                                 EPA-600/1-76-019
                                                 March 1976
      BASELINE LEVELS OF PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM

                 IN HUMAN TISSUE
                       By

Donald E. Johnson, R. John Prevost, John B.  Tillery,
       David E. Camann and John M.  Hosenfeld
            Southwest nesearch Institute
                 8500 Culebra Road
             San Antonio, Texas  78284
              Contract No.  68-02-1274
                Project Officer

              Dr. Robert ?1. Bruce
          Clinical Studies Division
      Health Effects Research Laboratory
      Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
                       t , !  ,
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
       HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
       RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. 27711

-------
                             DISCLAIMER
     Th\s report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies  of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                            ABSTRACT







        This report presents the results of an epidemiological study of





populations living near a freeway in Los Angeles, California, and in the




high desert region of Lancaster,  California, for concentrations of platinum,





palladium,  and lead in blood, urine, hair, feces, autopsy tissues, ambient




air, surface water and soil.  Platinum  and palladium are  determined in




samples from miners in Sudbury,  Ontario,  Canada,  and metal refinery




workers in New Jersey.




       Analytical methods  are developed for platinum, palladium and lead




using atomic absorption spectrophotometry.




       The objective is to determine baseline levels of platinum  and





palladium in the population and environment prior to wide-spread use of




catalyst-equipped vehicles.  Lead is determined to ascertain the future




epidemiological effect of non-leaded gasoline.




       Platinum and palladium concentrations were below the detection




limit for Los Angeles, Lancaster, and  Sudbury samples.  Refinery workers'




urine and refinery air samples  had detectable concentrations of both metals.




       Higher lead values were observed in Los Angeles samples taken




near the San Diego Freeway than  in samples taken in the high desert area





of Lancaster, California.




       This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project No.  01-3881-003




and Contract No.  68-02-1Z74 by Southwest Research Institute under  the




sponsorship of the Environmental Protection Agency. Work was  completed




as of August, 1975.
                                 m

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                        Page

Abstract                                                 ill
Table of Contents                                         iv
List of Figures                                            x
List of Tables                                             xi
Acknowledgments                                        X1V

I.     CONCLUSIONS                                      1

II.    RECOMMENDATIONS                               4

III.   INTRODUCTION                                     6

IV.   EXPERIMENTAL                                   10

      A.   Selection of Study Sites                        10

           1.    Baseline                                10
           2.    Mining                                  11
           3.    Refineries                              12

      B.   Recruitment of Study Participants             12

           1.    General Approach                       12
           2.    Questionnaire Development              15
           3.    Backup Materials                       18
           4.    Recruitment Activities                  20

                 a.  Southern California                 20
                 b.  Ontario                             25
                 c.  New Jersey                         26

           5.    Participant Selection                    27

           6.    Description of Study Participants        29

      C.   Collection of Samples                         30

           1.    Environment                            30

                 a.  Baseline                            30
                 b.  Mining                             37
                 c.  Refineries                          38
                                IV

-------
              Table of Contents (cont'd.)
1).
2).
3).
4).
5).
Blood
Urine
Hair
Feces
Tissues
      2.    Study Pargicipants

           a.   General Procedure                 39
           b.   Informed Consent                   43
           c.   Information Sheets                  44

D.    Analytical Methods                           51

      1.    Literature Review                      51
      2.    Instrumentation                         53
      3.    Reagents                               53
      4.    Selection of Analytical  Methodology      54
      5 .    Platinum and Palladium Methodology     54

           a.   Extraction Procedure               54
           b.   Biological Samples                 64

                                                   64
                                                   65
                                                   67
                                                   67
                                                   68

           c.   Environmental Samples             69

                1).   Air Samples                   69
                2).   Soil Samples                  69
                3).   Water Samples                71

      6.    Lead Methodology                       71

           a.   Biological Samples                  71

                1).   Blood                         71
                2).   Urine                         72
                3).   Hair                          72
                4).   Feces                        73
                5).   Tissues                       74

-------
         Table of Contents (cont'd.)


                                             Page

      b.   Environmental Seimples             74

          1).    Air                           74
          2).    Soil                           75
          3).    Water                         77

7.    Calculations and Analytical Data         77

      a.   Instrument Parameters             77
      b.   Standard Solutions                   80

          1).    Platinum and Palladium       80
          2).    Lead                          80

      c.   Analytical Data                     82

          1).    Limits of Detection           82
          2).    Precision                     82
          3).    Accuracy                     82

8.    Special Analysis                         84

      a.   Paint Analysis for Pb Content       84

          1).    Analytical Procedure          84
          2)    Results                       84

      b.   Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA)   85

          1).    Blood                         85
          2).    Analytical Procedure          85
          3).    Results                       86

      c.   Dilution Tunnel Sweeping            86

          1).    Analytical Procedure          86
          2).    Results                       87

      d.   Vacutainer Contamination Study     88

          1).    Introduction                   88
          2).    Experimental                  88

-------
    Table of Contents (cont'd.)


                                       Page

          a)   Selection of
               Vacutainers               88

          b)   Analytical Procedure      89

               (i) Lead Analysis         91
               (ii)  Platinum and
                   Palladium  Analysis   91

     3).   Discussion                    92
     4).   Calculations                   93

          a)   Regression Analysis       93
          b)   Statistical Analysis        93

     5).   Results                        96

          a)   Lead                      96

               (i)  Blood                 96
               (ii)  Water and  Acid       98

          b)   Platinum and Palladium   98

     6).   Conclusion                    98

          a)   Lead                      98
          b)   Platinum and Palladium  100
          c)   Contamination            100

e.   Lead-210 Study                    100

     1).   Selection of Subcontractor    100
     2).   Method of Analysis           101

          a)   Sample Preparation     101
          b)   Sample Dissolution      102
          c)   Decontamination         102
          d)   Counting                102
          e)   Calculations             103
             Vl l

-------
                    Table of Contents (cont'd.)


                                                      Page

                     3).    Limit of Detection in
                           Blood and Feces            104

                           a)   Blood                  104
                           b)   Feces                  104

           9.    Discussion and Conclusions            104

                 a.   Platinum and Palladium           104
                 b.   Lead                             106


      E.   Data Processing                            109

      F.   Statistical Methods                         112

           1.    Baseline                             112

                 a.   Environment                      112
                 b.   Human Subjects                   114

           2.    Refineries                            118

                 a.   Environmant                      118
                 b.   Study Participants                119


V.    RESULTS                                       122

      A.   Baseline                                   122

           1.    Platinum and Palladium               122
           2.    Lead                                 126

                 a.   Environment                      126
                 b.   Study Participants                133
                 c.   Autopsy - Los Angeles            152
                 d.   Sources of Variation in Human
                     Lead Determinations              152
                 e.   210Pb Analysis                   163

-------
                     Table of Contents (cont'd.)
            Mining

            1.    Environment
            Z.    Study Participants
            3.    Autopsy Cases

            Refineries

            1.    Environment
            Z.    Study Participants
                                          Page

                                          166

                                          166
                                          168
                                          168

                                          168

                                          168
                                          17Z
References

Appendix A


Appendix B


Appendix C


Appendix D

Appendix E

Appendix F
Individual Information on Participants
from Los Angeles and Lancaster

Determination of Sample Size to
Analyze Vacutainer  Contamination Study

Individual Lead Values for Participants
from Los Angeles and Lancaster

The Labeling  Code

Analysis Variables in Lead

Effect of Additional  Factors on Lead
Concentration
179

18Z


185


187


ZZO

ZZ4

230

-------
                        LIST OF FIGURES


Figure Number                                          Page

1.     Platinum, Palladium and Lead Questionnaire         16

2.     Pertinent Socioeconomic and Demographic
       Characteristics of Volunteer Participants            32

3.     Volunteer's Informed Consent                       45
                                        f
4.     Effect of Acid Concentration Upon HMWA
       Extraction of Pt and Pd                             58

5.     Extraction of Pt (25 ng) from 3M HC1 Using
       Various Concentrations of SnCl_, Solution (3MHC1)   60

6.     Extraction of Pd (12.5 ng) from 3M HC1 Using
       Various Concentrations of SnCl., Solution (3M HC1)   61

7.     Regression Analysis of Blood-Pb Spikes             90

8.     Baseline Soil Lead Sample Data                    129

9.     Soil Lead Concentration with Distance from
       the San Diego  Freeway                            130

-------
                        LIST OF TABLES
Table Number                                              Page

1.     Numerical Coding of Responses to Questions
       8 and 10                                              19

2.     Pertinent Socioeconomic and Demographic
       Characteristics of Volunteer Participants               31

3.     Analysis of Occupations of Volunteer Participants       33

4.     Effect of Elements Upon Extraction of Pt and Pd
       from 3M HC1                                         59

5.     Limits of Detection of Pt and Pd in Biological
       Samples                                              63

6.     Pt and Pd Spike Levels of Composite Samples          66

7.     Limits of Detection of Pt and Pd in Environmental
       Samples                                              70

8.     Comparison of 6M HC1 "Leach" with Aqua Regia
       "Digest" of Glass-Fiber Air Filter for Pb               76

9.     Instrument Parameters for  Lead Determination
       by Air/Acetylene Flame                               78

10.    Instrument Parameters for  the HGA-2000
       Determination of Pt, Pd and Pb                        79

11.    Pb Spike Levels Used to Calculate Analytical Curves    81

12.    Precision for Pb Analysis                              83

13.    Vacutainer Study Data                                  94

14.    Results of Vacutainer Study --  Comparison of
       Controls and Vacutainer Blood  Lead                    97

15.    Vacutainer Study Pt  and Pd  Results                     99

16.    Platinum and Palladium Levels in Southern
       California                                           123
                               Xl

-------
                    List of Tables (corit'd)
Table Number                                              Page

17.    Autopsy Cases - Los Angeles                         1Z4

18.    Platinum and Palladium in Autopsy Samples-
       Los Angeles                                         1Z5
                                   1   n
19.    Baseline Air Lead Sample Data                       127

ZO.    Comparative Analysis of Baseline Air Lead Data      1Z8

21.    Outlier Analysis of Baseline Soil Lead Data           13Z

ZZ.    Comparative Analysis of Baseline Tap Water
       Lead Data                                           134

Z3.    Skewness Test of Normal Distribution Under
       Various Transformations of the  Baseline Human
       Subject Lead Determinations                         135

Z4.    F Test of Various Equality Unde:r Various Trans-
       formations of the Baseline Human Subject Lead
       Determinations                                      137

Z5A.   Baseline Lead Concentration Data Summary (Blood)    139

Z5B.   Baseline Lead Concentration Data Summary
       (Long Hair)                                         140

Z5C.   Baseline Lead Concentration Data Summary
       (Short Hair)                                         141

Z5D.   Baseline Lead Concentration Data Summary (Urine)    14Z

25E.   Baseline Lead Concentration Data Summary (Feces)    143

Z6 .    t Test of Significant Mean Lead Concentration
       Differences between Los Angeles and Lancaster
       Participants                                         145

Z7.    Sampling of High Blood Lead Concentrations in
       Baseline Participants                                148

Z8.    Significance of Additional Factor Relationships        150

-------
                    List of Tables (cont'd)


Table Number                                              Page

29.    Autopsy Tissues (Los Angeles)                       153

30.    Variance in Participant Groups                       154

31.    Blood Lead Determinations from Sampling
       Experiment                                         157

32.    Analysis of Variance of Natural Log Blood Lead
       Determinations                                      158

33.    Sources of Blood Lead Variability                    159

34.    Platinum and Palladium Concentrations in Air
       Samples at the Sudbury Mine                         167

35.    Autopsy Cases - Sudbury                             169

36.    Platinum and Palladium Concentrations in Air
       Samples at the New Jersey Precious Metals
       Refinery                                            171

37.    Platinum Concentrations in Urine Samples from
       the Six New Jersey Refinery Workers with
       Detectable Platinum Levels                          173

38.    New Jersey Refinery Wroker Urine Palladium
       Concentrations Classification by Refinery Work
       Section                                              174

39.    The One-Way Analysis of Variance of Logarithmically
       Transformed Urine Palladium Concentrations by
       Refinery Work Section                               176

40.    Correlation of Log-Transformed Urine Lead
       Concentrations of Refinery Worker s  with Various
       Occupational and Social Factors                      178
                              XTM

-------
                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS



       The work accomplished in this study was materially assisted

by the interest, experience, and unstinting cooperation of personnel

of the  Catalyst Research Program,  EPA, Research Triangle Park,

and particularly that of Mr.  John Moran,  Dr. Robert Bruce,  Ms. Vandy

Duffield, and Dr.  Doug Worf of that facility.  The thanks of our entire

study team is offered to these  individuals for the help they provided.

This study was performed on locations in California, Pennsylvania,

New Jersey, Ontario and Texas; without  the significant cooperative

efforts of a large number  of diverse organizations at these locations,

accomplishment of the study objectives would have not been possible.
                                    :    I
Organizations to which particular acknowledgment is due include:

            The School of Public Health and
            The Office of Married Student Housing
                  UCLA

            Mira Loma Hospital
            Lancaster, California

            Wadsworth Veterans Administration Hospital
            Los Angeles, California

            Internation Nickel  Company
            New York, New York - Toronto, Ontario -
                                   Cop'per  Cliff,  Ontario

            Matthey Bishop, Inc.
            Malvern, Pennsylvania  & Winslow,  New Jersey


Because  epidemiological studies of this nature cannot be performed

without the cooperation and aid of individual volunteers who give of their
                                XIV

-------
time and efforts and, literally, blood, the authors  wish to extend





their personal thanks to the participants in California, Ontario, and





New Jersey who made this study possible.
                               XV

-------
                        I.  CONCLUSIONS










        1)   Baseline levels of platinum and palladium in the





environment (ambient air, surface soil and tap water) and in urban





populations (children, young adults, elderly - male and female - blood,




urine, hair, feces and autopsy samples - liver, kidney, spleen, muscle




and fat) of Southern  California (Los Angeles and Lancaster) are




extremely low.  The levels in nearly all samples were below the




detectable limits of  the analytical methods. These samples were




collected in September 1974 prior to the introduction of the 1975 automo-




biles  which were equipped for the first time with the  catalytic muffler.







        Z)   The design of the environmental epidemiology study of





baseline levels of platinum and palladium was such that, if needed, a





future survey could  be conducted to determine whether or not the




operation of the catalyst-equipped vehicles has altered these baseline




levels.







        3)   The levels of lead in ambient air and surface  soil were




substantially higher  in the study areas of Los Angeles than in Lancaster.





There were no differences in lead content of tap water collected from




residences in these  study areas.  Examination  of exterior paint on the




surfaces of residences in Los Angeles indicated a low level of lead.







       4)   Lead in  blood, urine, long hair  and  short hair was




significantly higher  in study participants in  Los Angeles than in  those




                                 1

-------
in Lancaster.  Feces lead (a good indicator of orally ingested lead)




was slightly higher in Lancaster residents than those studied in Los




Angeles.  The  residents studied in Los: Angeles were selected from




those living very close  (within two blocks) and on the downwind side




(prevailing winds) of a major expressway (approximately 225,000 cars/day.




Surface soil lead values showed very high levels close to the freeway




with decreasing values  with distance away from the expressway.  Thus,




given the known high lead values in air and soil from the expressway




source and the elimination of the other common sources of lead ingestion




(food, water,  paint), it appears highly likely that automotive lead




emissions were responsible  for the observed lead levels in blood, hair




and urine of the Los Angeles  study participants.






       5)  The examination of ambient air and miners for levels of




platinum and palladium in the Sudbury area of Canada did not provide




definitive data  on the relationship of ambient air levels of platinum and




palladium.  This was because air levels  (except for  one part of the




plant) were below detectable levels.






       6)  Data from platinum and palladium refineries indicate that




measureable levels of platinum (0.5-2,,6 |ag/liter) and  palladium




(0.3-6.3 fig/liter) are found  in urine of workers exposed to air containing



               3                             3
0.02-0.2 |o.g/m  platinum and .001-0.36  |J.g/m  of palladium.




Measureable levels were not found in blood from these  workers.



                                 2

-------
       7)   The information from the refineries indicates that it is

likely that measureable levels of platinum and palladium would be seen

in the general population when ambient levels of these two metals

                   3
approach 0.1 |jg/m .  The metals would appear initially in urine  rather


than blood. The data do not provide any inferences with regard to the


absorption of soluble or insoluble forms of the metals.  It is probable

that metal particles emitted from the catalytic muffler would have to be


in the respirable range for inhalation and absorption.  Reports from


Dr. Moore (EPA, Cincinnati) indicated that both soluble and insoluble

forms of respirable platinum and palladium were absorbed in animal

expe r im ent s.

-------
                     II.  RECOMMENDATIONS










        1)   The original plan was to examine blood,  urine, hair and





feces in refinery workers and to collect autopsy samples from former




refinery employees.  The refineries agreed to blood and urine





collections only.  Arrangements to collect autopsy samples from





pathologists in the area of the refinery were unsuccessful.  Additional




data are needed on the distribution of platinum and palladium in human





tissue other than blood and urine following exposure to air containing





the two metals at the  0.01-0.1 fj.g/m   levels.  It is  likely that autopsy




samples could be collected if additional effort were expended and if




the sampling period covered at least two years.







        2)   Additional data to  define the relationships between air levels




of platinum and palladium, and tissue  levels in the general population




(different age groups, both sexes) are needed, but it is  recommended




that the collection of these data  be deferred until there is more




information available on quantities and types (respirable-nonrespirable,




solubility, chemical form) of the two metals emitted from the catalytic




mufflers.  Data are available  which indicate that particles of these





two metals are emitted,  but the physical and chemical characteristics





of these particles have not yet been established.







        3)   It appears that the placement of priorities for evaluation of




the potential health effects of the catalytic  mufflers should emphasize




the production of sulfuric acid and sulfates .  Additional effort should




                                  4

-------
the production of sulfuric acid and sulfates.  Additional effort should




be directed at characterizing the emissions from these muffler




systems.  It is strongly recommended that research be initiated to




evaluate the health impact of the catalytic muffler on populations living




in the immediate vicinity of major expressways with regard to




evaluated levels of sulfuric acid and sulfates from automotive emissions.




It is recognized that the muffler has been in use  for only one year  on new




automobiles (1975), so the impact will not be significant for perhaps




one or two more years, but efforts  need to be initiated so that the




necessary techniques for ambient air measurements and measurement




of proper health effects indices can be perfected.

-------
                     III.   INTRODUCTION





        Catalytic converters were introduced (late September 1974) on


many of the 1975 model automobiles in the United States to reduce


emissions of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons.  The catalysts


used small quantities of platinum and palladium, and there have been


some indications of emissions ofparticles of these metals.  Health effects frc


exposure to platinum and palladium reviewed in a previous part of

           (1)
this study    indicated that  soluble forms of platinum can create allergic


responses in sensitive  individuals.  Hov/ever,  little information is


available concerning long-term chronic exposure of humans to  low levels


of platinum or palladium,  in particular for  groups that may be  at greater


risk such as the young  or  aged and for individuals with some type of


medical impairment.   There are also some indications that platinum can


be methylated,  thus possibly producing a more toxic component.


        The EPA has placed additional emphasis  on the collection of


biological data on platinum (Pt) and palladium  (Pd);  since  there is limited


biological experience with them, they are likely  to be persistent, they


may be metabolized to  more toxic  products, and exposures will involve


the general population.  Emissions from vehicles equipped with the


oxidation catalysts contain components other than Pt and Pd which may


create health  effects.   The production of sulfates and  sulfuric acid by the


catalyst is particularly important.  This project has been directed at the


possible introduction of Pt and Pd  as particulates and with the  reduction

-------
of lead emissions to the environment, as the catalyst equipped vehicles
require non-leaded gasoline.
       Several papers were presented at a symposium,  entitled "Health
Consequences of Environmental Controls: Impact of Mobile Emissions
Controls", relative to the problems of trace metals involved in the usage
of the oxidative  catalyst equipped vehicles.  The subjects of these papers
included examination of emission data, toxicological investigations of
the two metals,  development of analytical assay methods,  review of
relevant health effects information, effects of the usage of the catalyst
on world markets of Pt and Pd and the design of an environmental
epidemiology  study to collect health effects data on Pt and Pd.  Many of the
papers discussed plans for conduct of their studies.  The overall intent
of the symposium was to  review the available data and to make
recommendations as to the additional information needed to make decisions
regarding the safety of the catalytic muffler.  Specifically,  these
investigations were to provide data to assist both EPA and affected
industries in solutions to this and future problems which impact on public
health.
                                                                   (i)
       The design of this program was presented at this symposium;
thus,  its contents were reviewed by academic, government, nonprofit
and industrial organizations. The project has included two types of
environmental epidemiology studies: one directed at determining baseline
levels of platinum, palladium, and lead in the general population prior
to the introduction of the  catalysts equipped vehicles, and the second
                                  7

-------
aimed at determining platinum and palladium residues in occupationally




exposed individuals  with the intent to define the relationship between





airborne levels and tissue levels of the two metals.




       The baseline study was to be conducted in Southern California





with the selection of a population with relatively heavy exposure to





automobile emissions and  also in a second population with low exposure




to vehicular emissions.  Three age groups  of both sexes were to be





examined;  children, young adults and elderly.  The demographic make-ups




of the two populations were to be as similar as possible.  Tissue samples




were also to be collected at autopsy from individuals  from the study area




to determine levels of the  three metals in different tissues.





       The location of the survey of a population with high exposure to




vehicular emissions was selected so that it would be able to utilize





ambient air data  from the  L.A.C.S. located along the San Diego Ereeway in




Los Angeles.  The design of this baseline study was such that it would




provide an accurate estimation of levels of Pt,  Pd and lead just prior  to




the introduction of the catalytic mufflers.  These data could then be used




for comparison with similarly collected data for  subsequent years,




assuming continued usage  of the catalyst.  The baseline data would serve





a very useful purpose for determining the impact of this new technology




on the environment and on tissue levels.





       The occupationally exposed populations were to be drawn from




platinum and palladium refineries located in New Jersey and from the




mining and processing of ore containing Pt  and Pd located in the




                                  8

-------
Sudbury, Canada area.  The reasons for including mining and refinery




workers is that the mining was likely to involve exposure to insoluble




forms of the two metals,  while the refineries will involve at least a




portion  of the metals in the soluble form. These surveys were also to




include  examination of autopsy tissue from deceased employees at these




sites.

-------
                      IV.  EXPERIMENTAL







A.     Selection of Study Sites





       1.     Baseline




              The Los Angeles area was selected for the high exposure




to vehicular emissions because it has a very large population  and a high




percentage of new automobiles projected for the new car year (1975)




equipped with the catalyst, emissions from heavy industry can be





minimized by selection of areas within the city, and the EPA  study (LACS)




was located in the area.  After an on-site  inspection of  the area, it was





decided to conduct the study on the east side of the San Diego Freeway




(within 2 blocks) bounded on the north by Sunset Boulevard and on the





south by National Boulevard.   The San Diego Freeway has a traffic




density of 225,000 - 250,000 cars per day in this area.   The prevailing





winds in this area are from the west and southwest; thus, the  study area




is downwind of the freeway much of the time.  Much of the residential area




within the above boundaries was at the same level as the freeway, and




the residents were primarily middle class residing in single and multiple




dwellings.




       The low  exposure area selected for the baseline  study  was in





Lancaster, California.  This city is located 70 miles northeast of Los





Angeles in the high desert. The city is not affected by smog from the Los




Angeles  basin.  The city has a population  of 30, 948  and has light industry




with no known point sources of lead, platinum or palladium.   The






                                10

-------
surrounding area is very sparsely inhabited.  The population from this


area was drawn from various areas of the city with the predominate

workplace  (of those  studied) being a county hospital located in the fringe

of the city.



       2.     Mining


              There are only very small quantities of Ft and Pd mined


in the United States, principally as a residue of other metal mining.

The Sudbury area of Canada is the largest producer of these two metals

in North America.   The ore in this area contains very low levels of Pt

and Pd as compared with South African ore which is  10-20 times higher.

The primary metals produced in Sudbury are copper and nickel, with


smaller quantities of iron.  Gold,  silver, tellurium, osmium, rhodium,
                                                i
selenium,  cobalt, platinum and palladium are produced  from the ore


residue. Platinum and palladium  are processed to a concentrate and then

sent to refineries for further processing.

              The largest mining company in the Sudbury area is the

International Nickel and Copper Ontario (INCO).   Contacts were made

with this company through offices  in New York and Toronto.  This

organization gave their approval for the conduct of the survey at their

plant in Sudbury contingent upon approval of the unions prior to contacts


with union  employees.   INCO was  very cooperative and provided

considerable assistance in the conduct of the survey at their plant.
                                11

-------
       3.    Refineries




             There are two primary platinum and palladium refineries





located in the United States.   Each of these companies was approached




for their cooperation and participation in the study.  Both companies




had considerable reservations about the study. After numerous




discussions, each agreed to participate  for a portion of the planned  survey.




Both of the refineries  studied are located in New Jersey.




             One of the companies agreed to collect samples of blood





and urine from employees within the refinery and to collect air particulate




samples  within the work environment of these employees.  The company




performed analysis on the collected samples for platinum and palladium




and submitted the results to SwRI.




             The second company (Matthey Bishop,  Inc., Malvern,  Pa.)





collected blood and urine samples from  their refinery employees, along





with pertinent information on each employee  sampled such as age,  sex,




length of time with company,  duties within plant, smoking  history, and




ethnic origin.  The company also  collected air particulate  samples in the




plant during the week that the employees were sampled. All collected




samples  were divided,  with a portion to the  company laboratories and




the balance to SwRI.





B.     Recruitment of Study Participants





       1.    General Approach





             The general approach taken in  this study to solicit and




recruit volunteer participants has been to work through organizations.








                               12

-------
The organizations worked with directly have been employers of volunteer




participants and a university attended by other volunteer participants.




              Another method used successfully by this study team




utilizes house-to-house surveys to recruit volunteer participants.





House-to-house surveys were considered and ruled out as unnecessary




in this study due to the degree of precision needed in positioning of the





place of residence of the volunteers.  In this study,  it is sufficient that





the volunteers live within a specific region or work for a specific





employer.  The precision required for this  study can be well achieved by





working through organizations.  Working through organizations provided




the study  team with a number of advantages over house-to-house surveys.




Principal personnel in  the organizations served as points of initial




contact, liaison during planning  recruitment activities, and provided aid





during recruitment, selection, and sample gathering activities.





Volunteers feel more comfortable in familiar surroundings during




recruitment and sample gathering activities.




              The first step taken in the recruitment activities, when




working through organizations, is initial telephone contact with a potential




participant organization.  In many cases, preliminary telephone calls




are required to appropriate  state,  federal, or local government agencies




or to local universities and industries to determine the background of




circumstances in the particular area which might affect successful





recruitment  and use of human volunteers.  In this study,  preliminary




phone calls were made to each of the types of institutions listed above.





                                13

-------
The initial telephone contact is used to briefly describe the study and





the need for human volunteers.  A minimum of information regarding the





study is provided at this point, as the  primary goal of the initial phone





call (or  calls,  as usually occurs) is to establish a person in the




organization who will serve as the initial contact and to establish a time





and place for meeting in person with representatives of the organizations




to discuss in detail the specific proposal  of study.  Arrangements are





usually made at this  point to forward to the initial contact person a set




of written materials  explaining in detail the background of the study and





the specific requirements needed from the participating organization.





These are forwarded for review before the initial meeting in order that





the potential participating organization can better prepare for the meeting.





               At the initial meeting, the potential organization is briefed




 regarding study requirements. The principal objective of the meeting  is to





obtain permission for performing the  study.  Other objectives include




establishment  of a principal person for contact, a time and place for




meeting with potential volunteers, and establishments of the methods to




be used  in recruitment acitivities.  The initial meeting is followed by




advertisement  of the study which specifies the place and time for the





meeting with potential volunteers, and, finally, the recruitment meeting




where materials explaining the purpose and requirements of the study are





provided and questionnaire forms are  completed by volunteers.
                                 14

-------
        2.      Questionnaire Development




               In order to recruit and select volunteer participants, a




questionnaire form, shown in Figure 1, was developed.   The form was




designed to be self-administered with a minimum of instructions.  A record





of the racial/ethnic background of each potential participant is included




in the form design.  This portion of the questionnaire is coded for




completion by the person administering the data collection.  Coded





instructions for keypunching the results of completed forms are included




on the form itself. A three-step procedure was designed to obtain and





process information regarding potential participants with use of the




questionnaire form.  Step 1 is administration of the questionnaire to





potential participants including brief explanation as to study background,





necessity of volunteer participants, and types of information required for





proper  participant selection.  The questionnaire is filled out by potential





participants and racial/ethnic background is recorded by the person




administering the data collection.




               Step 2 involves preparation of the completed forms for




keypunching.  An identification number  is assigned to each  completed




questionnaire form and coded in the appropriate boxes on the form.  Most




of the information on the form is numerically coded in the form design so




that this preparation mainly involves inscription of the numerical




information in an appropriate box.  However, Question 8 "What is the




nature of the company for  which you work?" and Question 10,  "What is




your job title?" are not directly encodable. Answers recorded for these






                                15

-------
                   Figure  1.   Platinum,   Palladium  and  Lead Questionnaire
                                                                                                                      OMB 158 S 74010
                                                                                                       Approval expires September 3, 1975
                                               ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
                                                                                                         STAFF USE ONLY
                                                                                                              Cols 1-4

                                                                                                         ID#
1    Name (In Full).	
?   Address  Street.
             City	
             Postal Code.
             Telephone	
                                                                                                                             Cols 5-30

                                                                                                                             Cols 31-50
                                                                                                                             Cols 51-65
                                                                                                                             Cols 66-70
                                                                                                                             Cols 71 77

                                                                                                                               Col 80
                                                                    	Years
3   How many years have you lived in your present city or town'

4   Is your residence located
     1-ln the central portion of a city                 3—In a rural town or community
     2-ln a suburban community or residential area      4—In a rural setting some distance from any town.
5    How far is your residence from the nearest


     a  Freeway, expressway or turnpike


     b  Other major multilane traffic artery


     c  Large industrial or mining operation
6.   Do you have air conditioning in your living quarters?   1—No
                                                   2—Yes, window only
                                                   3—Yes, central

7    Which of these best describes your present occupational status.
                                                                                                                               Col 6
less than
2 blocks
1
1
1
less than
1 mile
2
2
2
1 mile or
more
3
3
3
                                                                                                                               Col 7
                                                                                                                               Col 11
     1—Employed fulltime (including self-employed)
     2—Employed part-time
     3-Unemployed
                                                     4—Housewife
                                                     5—Student
                                                     6-Play/Nursery School
  7-Pre-School
  3-Retired
IF YOU ARE EMPLOYED, PLEASE CONTINUE. OTHERWISE, SKIP THE NEXT FIVE QUESTIONS AND BEGIN AGAIN WITH QUESTION 13.

8   What is the nature of the company for which you work'

    1—Mining and smelting                      3—Finished metal products
    2-Oil or chemical industry                  4—Jewelry
                              5-Other (Please Specify)	
                                                                                                                             Cols 1213
9    How long have you worked for your present employer?.


10.  What is your job title?	,	
11. Your work is primarily
                                1—Office work
                                2—Production or manufacturing
                                3-Other (Please specify)	
You perform your work primarily  1 -Inside
                              2  Outside
12  If you work in production or manufacturing, does your work involve1
                                                                                                                               Col 19
    1-Assembly       3-Chemical Processing       5-Ore Concentration      7-Other (Please Specify)
    2—Machining      4—Smelting                6—Mining	

13  Have you ever smoked as many as five packs of cigarettes, that is, as many as 100 cigarettes during your entire life'   1 -Yes
                                                                                                      2-No
                                                                                                                               Col 20
14  Do you now smoke cigarettes'
                                                                                                      1-Yes
                                                                                                      2-No
                                                                                                                               Col 21
                                                                  16

-------
Figure  1   (continuation)       Platinum,  Palladium  and  Lead Questionnaire
 15  II you are a current or >in ex cigarette smoker:

     er day

         1 - Less than 112 pack per day (1-5 cigarettes per day)
         2-About 1/2 pack per day (614 cigarettes per day)
         3-About 1  pack per day (15 25 cigarettes per day)
                   4-About 1-1/2 packs per day (26-34) cigarettes per day)
                   5-About 2 packs per day (35 or more cigarettes per day)
     b    How old were you when you first started smoking?-
                                                            _Years
     r    How old wrro you when you last gave up smoking, if you no longer smoke?_	Years
 Hi  Wh.il is yout mm it.il st.itus7
1--Single
2 -Married
3 -Separated
4-Divorced
5-Widowed
 17   How many times have you and your family changed living quarters during the last five years?

     0- None          2-Two times        4-Four times
     1-One time       3-Three times       5-Five times or more

 18   What educational level has been completed by the head of your household:
     I - Less thnn 8th qrade
     2  8th grade
     j  High School - Incomplete
     4- High School -Completed

 19   What was your age in years on your last birthday?_
20  What is the natural color of your hair'
21  What is your sex?
                              1-Male
22  Females Only.

    a   What is your hormonal status?



    h   Do you use oral contraceptives'
       1—Brown
       2-Black
       3-Red

  2—Female
1—Pre puberty
2-Menstrual
3—Menopause

1-Yes
2-No
               5—College—Incomplete
               6-College-Completed
               7-Graduate School
              .Years
  4-Blond
  5—Gray
23  Have you ever experienced any of the lung related     0—None
    problems listed here:                             1—Asthma
                                                  2—Emphysema
                                                  3—Tuberculosis
                                                  4-Histoplasmosis
                                                  5—Bronchiectasis
                               6—Bronchiohtis
                               7—Bronchitis
                               8—Tumor or Cancer
                               9-Other (Please Specify)
2t  Aio you presently being treated for any of the illnesses listed here.     0-None        3-Sickle-cell
                                                               1-Diabetes     4-Kidney disease (Please Specify)
                                                               2-Thyroid     ___	

25  Are you presently taking prescription medication on a regular, daily basis?    0-None        2-Stimulant     4-Cortisone Type
                                                                    1-Tranquilizer   3-Pam         5-Other (Please Specify)
                                                                                     Suppressant   	
YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE QUESTIONNAIRE
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION
                                             STAFF USE ONLY
                                           IMNOWO 1 23456
                                                                                                                             Col 22
                                                                                                                           Cols 23 24
                                                                                   Col 28
                                                                                   n
                                                                                   Col 29
                                                                                  Cols 30 31
                                                                                                                             Col 32
                                                                                                                             Col 33
                                                                                                                             Col 34
                                                                Col 35
                                                                Col 36
                                                                n
                                                                                                                             Col 37
                                                                                   Col 38
                                                                                   Col 39
                                                                                                                             r
                                                                                                                             Col 80
                                                               17

-------
questions have been reduced to the numerical codes shown in Table 1

and encoded in the appropriate boxes on the forms.  The third and final

step in preparation and processing of the questionnaire data is keypunching

the data onto two keypunch cards.  Card 1 contains name, address, and

telephone number,  and card 2 contains covariate data used to select

participants and, ultimately,to correlate with the results of analysis of

the samples obtained from human volunteers.


       3.      Backup Materials
                                                      /
               A set of backup materials was developed for use in

recruiting organizations and in recruiting volunteer participants at each

organization.   The materials included a narrative  summary describing the

study and requirements of participating organizations and volunteer

participants, a one-page summary of sample collection criteria and

procedures for each of the four distinct areas in which organizations and

participants were recruited, and a one-page summary of study background

and specific requirements for volunteer participants for each separate

organization from which volunteers were obtained. In addition,  a one-

page brief summary of requirements for autopsy samples in the two areas

of Southern California was generated for use in soliciting help in the

matter of collecting and providing to this study such samples by appropriate

agencies.
                                18

-------
                                 Table 1
                     Numerical Coding of Responses
                          to Questions 8 and 10
Question 8 :  Code 1 - 4 as indicated on form.
             Code 5 in following manner:

                  5 other, (inappropriately answered)
                  6 medicine (dentistry)
                  7 public assistance  (fire, police, ambulance)
                  8 law
                  9 education
                10 business (commercial activity)
                11  industry
                12 recreation
                13  media
                14 government (civil service,  military)
                15 construction
                16  research
Question 10: Job Title
                 0  (inappropriately answered)
                 1  professional
                 2  administrative
                 3  technical
                 4  clerical (secretary, file clerk,  cashier)
                 5  sales
                 6  foreman and craftsmen
                 7  laborer (kitchen, custodial,  maintenance, news carrier)
                 8  assistant (attendant)
                 9  volunteer worker
                10  waiter, waitress
                11  teacher
                12  librarian
                13  heavy motorized equipment operator
                14  mining
                15  refining
                16  electrowinmng
                                  19

-------
       4.     Recruitment Activities

              a.   Southern California

                   The study design incorporated use of volunteer

participants living near a freeway in Los Angeles and a second set of

volunteer participants living in an area with less exposure to automotive

emissions near the Los Angeles area.  The design was to match the

socioeconomic characteristics of the more and less exposed groups as

much as is practical and reasonable so as to minimize spurious effects

due to socioeconomic parameters. A number of public organizations in

the Los Angeles region were contacted to obtain advice regarding specific

areas appropriate for the study design.  Principal organizations and

persons  contacted are the following:
       Person

       Dr. Fred Ottoboni
       Dr. Norm Perkins

       Jim Heacock
       Dr. Oscar Balchum
       Jack Rogers
       Dallas  Candy
       Dr. Stanley Rocow

       Dr. Thomas T.  Noguchi,
       Medical Examiner
Organization	

State Dept. of Health
Berkeley, Calif

State Dept. of Health
L.A. Branch Office
Occupational Health Unit

USC Medical School
Dept. of Chest Medicine

L.A. County Dept. of Health
Occupational & Radiological
   Health

Acting L.A. County Health Officer
L.A. County Dept. of Health

L.A. County Lung Association

Los  Angeles County
                                20

-------
Person
Don Madden
J. A. Stuart,
County Air Pollution
Control Officer

Howard Lange
Dr. Ray Thompson

Wesley Sholts, Dir.
Ron Huber,  Asst. Dir.
Dr. Picken, Staff Phys.
Robert M. Young,
 Personnel Officer

Dr. Wright, Chief of
 Staff
Henry  Ford, Office of
 Director
Dr. Fishken,  Chief of
 Clinical Lab. Sciences
Cordell R . Welcome,
 Office of the  Director
John Valance, Director
 of Brentwood
Dr. Jeremiah Thompson,   UCLA
 Pharmacology Dept.
Dr. David Porter,  Pathology Dept.
Dr. Jane  L.  Valentine,
 School of Public Health
Dr. John  F.  Schacher, Professor of
 Infectious & Tropical Diseases,
 Div. of Epidemiology, School of
 Public Health (also chairman  of
 human subjects)
Organization

Public Info. Assistant
Air Pollution Control
District
Los Angeles,  Calif.

District 7
California Highway Dept.
Los Angeles,  Calif.

Dept. of Health
Riverside County

U. C. Riverside

Mira  Loma Hospital
L. A. County Health
Wads worth VA Hospital
Los Angeles,   Calif.
                         21

-------
       Areas along the San Bernadino Freeway in the vicinity of Pomona,





San Bernadino and Riverside and areas along the San Diego Freeway in





Los Angeles and in the vicinity of Santa Monica were found to be the best




candidates for the study sites with higher exposure.  Recruitment through




churches, apartment complexes, hospitals,  and universities was con-




sidered.  An area in Los Angeles along the San Diego Freeway in the





vicinity of Santa Monica was ultimately chosen for the higher exposure





site.  The specific area lies immediately west of the San Diego Freeway,





in Los Angeles, between National Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard.





       Selection of this site was principally for the following four reasons:




1) EPA operates an air monitoring station in the vicinity of the site chosen




which is planned for long-term monitoring of the  San Diego Freeway.




2) The prevailing wind is from the direction of the ocean, four or five





miles away to the west, with little or no industry between the freeway




and the ocean.  Therefore, heavy metal pollutants found in the air can be




related to automotive traffic.  This  condition is not true for the  second




major area  considered for study, the San Bernadino Freeway. Pollutant




levels are generally higher on the San Bernadino  Freeway, but some of




the pollutants result from industrial, rather than automotive, sources.





3) A UCLA  student residential area  is located immediately adjacent to




the San Diego Freeway, downwind, and UCLA provided  approval for





volunteer student participation.  4) A large VA hospital, the  Wadsworth





Veterans Administration Hospital, is located near the freeway with a
                                22

-------
staff of several thousand,  some of whom reside in the primary area of

study, downwind of the vicinity of the freeway.  Conversations with

VA hospital staff indicated necessary cooperation could be expected to

recruit volunteer participants among hospital staff and staff families.

        Conversations with L.A. County Department of Health officials

yielded consideration of a  remote county hospital in  Lancaster,  California,

as the best candidate for volunteers from a less exposed area.  The area

is in Los Angeles County,  approximately 40 miles north of Los Angeles

metropolitan area, 70 miles out of downtown Los Angeles.  The population

makeup of the area of Lancaster was estimated to be similar to that

found in Los Angeles regarding socioeconomic parameters.  Subsequent

conversations with administrative staff at the hospital, Mira Loma

Hospital, Lancaster, California, indicated that the necessary cooperation

could be expected to enable SwRI to recruit volunteer participants among

hospital staff and staff families.

       Preliminary meetings were held with staffs at UCLA,  the Wadsworth

Veterans Administration Hospital,  and the Mira Loma Hospital.  A person

responsible for contact was established at each of the organizations:

              UCLA         -    Dr. Jane L. Valentine
              Wadsworth     -    Cordell R. Welcome
              Mira Loma    -    Robert M. Young

       For each organization, a specific date, time, and place was

established for meeting with potential volunteers, and the meeting was

advertised.  At  UCLA, an article was written and submitted to a campus

newspaper,  and notices were posted at appropriate bulletin boards  in the

                                23

-------
residential area, a married student housing area where students and





student families were located.  Some notes were provided directly to




residents of the campus housing selected for study.  On the appointed




day, a meeting was held with prospective volunteers to obtain completed





questionnaire forms from all volunteers, both students and student




families.




       At Wadsworth, an article was placed in the hospital newsletter,




and advertisements were posted on appropriate bulletin boards advertising




the recruitment meeting.  Prospective volunteers completed questionnaire




forms and turned them  in to the survey team.




       At Mira Loma,  the recruitment meeting was advertised by





placement of notices on appropriate bulletin boards.  On the appointed day,





SwRI staff first met with principal members of the hospital administrative




and medical staff.  A certain number of the supervisors then briefed their




people regarding the study requirements for volunteers. A subsequent




meeting with prospective volunteers was held to obtain completed questionnain




forms from all who volunteered for the study.




       The final set of  completed questionnaire forms were then prepared





for keypunch and the results were sorted and listed for use in selecting




specific volunteers.  Volunteers selected from the UCLA married student




housing area tended to be children and  young adults, with some older people.




Volunteers selected from Wadsworth tended to  be middle and older aged





adults,  with some younger adults.  Volunteers  selected from Mira






                                 24

-------
L/oma staff and families were from all three age groups:  children, young

adults,  and older adults.

              b.   Ontario

                   The study design incorporated use of volunteer

participants occupationally exposed to platinum  or palladium.  Persons

in the mining of precious metal refining industries were considered as

the primary candidates to fulfill this study requirement.   To the purpose

of securing cooperation and participation in the  study, the following

representatives of International Nickel Company were contacted in New

York, Toronto,  and Copper Cliff,  Ontario:
     Person
Louis S. Renzoni,
Vice President Operations

Norman Hillier,  Mgr.
Safety & Plant Protection

Hank  Berks, Safety & Plant
Protection

Keith Segsworth,
Air Management

Bill Brown, Assistant Mgr.
Prit Scott.  Employ eo
R ela lions
Organization t	,
   Location
J. C. Parlee, Vice  Chairman    INCO
of the Board
INCO of Canada
                      New York
Toronto
INCO,  Ontario Div.   Copper Cliff
INCO,  Ontario Div.   Copper Cliff
INCO,  Ontario Div.   Copper Cliff
INCO Copper
Refi no ry
Copper Cliff
iNC.O South Mine      Copper Cliff

-------
                   The offices in Toronto and Copper Cliff were visited





to brief appropriate officials regarding the proposed study and to




determine an appropriate site for study,,  if INCO should choose to




participate.  INCO officials chose to participate in the study and selected




a portion of the Copper Cliff which deals with precious metals and a




mine area where catalytic converters employing platinum and palladium





are used to a great extent.





                   Questionnaire forms were left with the assistant




manager of the Copper Refinery and with the employee  relations depart-





ment at the South Mine at Copper Cliff.  Volunteers were recruited by




company officials,  and forms were  completed and returned to SwRI





personnel at an appointed date.   All volunteers meeting the study




requirements of working in an area with  exposure to platinum or




palladium were selected as participants.




                   The cooperation and aid  supplied to this study by INCO




should be especially noted.  This company provided in excess of two man




weeks of senior level people, free of charge,  to aid the initiation of study




activities and followed this up by arranging  for a barber, two laboratory




technicians,  and performing air samplings at a number of stations,





again without compensation. INCO  is due our sincere thanks and





compliments and that of the Environmental Protection Agency.






              c .   New Jersey





                   Two companies dealing in precious metals refining in





New Jersey were selected for study.  Persons working in precious metals




                                26

-------
refining processes where some potential of exposure to platinum or
palladium exists were sought as study participants.   Officials of each of
the two firms were met with to secure cooperation and participation in
the study.
                 One of the firms conducted a study in their refinery
and reported the results to Southwest Research Institute.
                 Matthey Bishop, Inc. collected environmental and
human samples at their refinery located in Winslow, New Jersey.
These samples were analyzed at Southwest Research Institute.  The
primary individuals involved  with the study at Matthey Bishop were:
Mr. V. W.  Makin, President and Mr. Orin G. DeLa ,  Manager of
Industrial Relations.

       5.    Participant Selection

             a.  Selection Criteria
                 For each of the four areas studied, distinct selection
criteria were developed for recruiting and selecting volunteer
participants.  In general, the selection criteria can  be described with
two categories:  1) non-occupationally exposed participants and,
2) occupationally exposed participants.
                 Selection  criteria for the two groups of non-occupationally
exposed participants are principally involved with location of residence,
age, and sex of the participant.  For participants  from the area of high
exposure near the San Diego Freeway in Los Angeles, the  selection
criteria included four parameters: 1) normal occupation away from high
                               27

-------
potential of exposure to lead and precious metals,  2) location of





residence,  3)  age,  and  4) sex.  All persons selected as participants





lived in  the vicinity of the San Diego Freeway downwind of the prevailing





wind pattern (east of the  freeway).  The objective was to recruit three separat




age groips witii equal numbers of males and females in each age group.




The age groups are: 1-16 years, 17-34 years, and 35 years and over




(Groups  I,  II, and III, respectively).





                   For the second group of non-occupationally exposed





participants, those  from the area of lower exposure in the vicinity of




Lancaster,  California, the selection criteria included the  same four





parameters as for the higher exposed group.  However,  the residence





requirement was much less strict than that for the higher  exposed group.




It was sufficient that potential participants reside in the general area of





Lancaster or Palmdale and that they had no occupation which normally




took them into  Los Angeles.







                   The selection criteria for the occupationally exposed




participants were limited to two principe>l requirements:  1) occupation in




a job which potentially exposed the participant to significant levels of




platinum and/or palladium,  and 2) a minimum of six months at the





particular occupation.  Information regarding age and sex of the




participants was obtained, but no specific requirement was enforced




regarding these parameters.  Using the occupation criteria, participants




were recruited in Ontario,  Canada in the precious metals  mining and refining



industry and in New Jersey in the precious metals refining industry.




                                28

-------
                 For each participant,  a complete questionnaire form




was obtained with the exception of the refiners in New Jersey where




only a part of the questionnaire form was used: questions 1,  9,  10, 14,




19, and 21 as presented in Figure 1. In addition to the principal




parameters used as selction criteria, data regarding a number of




supplementary parameters were also obtained in order to identify certain




important socioeconomic and health related data for each individual.




These data can be used to  establish the gross characteristics of the




participants when statistical data are being used in comparisons between




different groups of participants.  Most important among  the supplementary




parameters are:  years of  residence in the city,  frequency of change of




living quarters, education level of the head of household, and smoking




history.




       6.    Description of Study Participants




             A total of 141 participants  were recruited and selected in




Los Angeles,  142 in Lancaster,  California, and 49 in Ontario through use




of the recruitment methods documented  here.  An additional 61  volunteer




participants were obtained in New Jersey by recruitment by company




officials in the particular organization chosen for study.   For the New




Jersey participants, information regarding age, occupation,  sex, and




smoking history was collected  with the partial questionnaire form.  The




ethnic composition  of these 393 volunteer participants is as follows:




Los Angeles:  60% white,  40% non-white;   Lancaster: 80% white,




20% non-white;  Ontario: 100% white; New Jersey: 90% white,  10% non-white.





                                29

-------
Pertinent socioeconomic and demographic characteristics for the volunteer




participants used in this study are presented in Table 2 and shown in




Figure 2.  Analysis of the occupations of the participants is provided in




Table 3.  Separate information is provided for the non-occupationally and




the occupationally exposed groups.  A complete listing of information on




all participants from Los Angeles and Lancaster  is  given in Appendix A.




To utilize the coded information, refer to Figure  1.





C.    Collection of Samples




       1.    Environment




             a.     Baseline
                   The baseline study for environmental characterization




of platinum, palladium and lead in air, water and soil was performed in




Lancaster and Los Angeles.  In Los Angeles, the reference point for




sample collection was the San Diego Freeway and the sites designated




as "A,B,C,&D" in the Los Angeles Catalytic Study (L.A.C.S.) and




operated by the E.P.A.  These sites are upwind and downwind and




straddle the freeway between Sunset and Wilshire Boulevards.




                   After approval was obtained and access granted  for




use of the "C" site, two hi-volume air samplers (Staplex) were set  up




adjacent to the samplers maintained by E.P.A.  The SwRI  samplers were




placed so that,  relative to the freeway, they were downwind and in the




same plane as the surface of the freeway.  Samples  were collected  on




Type A glass fiber filters without  organic binders.  Continuous collection




took place until the rotameter on the  saimpler approached 40 cfrn.
                               30

-------
       n)  •*-»
       •C  M
                             pj rj -OlO
                             (M <#    \f-
                                                   o in oolro
                                                   —1 rf    CO
                                                                   ^ csjloc.
                                                                   -I    l_
       c  a
       h  .;.
       b,  J
                      (M  I-H  —i|iri
                                                   CO -J<  CO|O
                                                   ^ CM  co|o
                                                                         O CO I CO

                                                                         — -<|CM
PI
al
Q,
a     •«
 On)
 c  a
 a)  d
t3  u
'^  °
 So-7

      CM
                             O vO sO rj
                                                      co  h-|ro
                                                      co  co|-<
                                                          CMlcM

                                                            IcM
I-«|T»<           00 in
                                                                                                  lro
                                                                          CM  olcM           f4

a
•o
1
>-^
|4
O
3 -S
ic ^j

S -1
2
o

w

U
2



4)
V
!l

1 3
"JJ O sO

^ 1
'O O ^
H,,-
nJ
i
s~\
™ 1*"' 1 I





o (M oolo o f\i oojo m coloo




^H ^H |^ -H r-HJrO

/





CT* *^ o IA in r^" r^ |o^ ^* '^ I o
tf* Tf *H O ID f\l ^H 1 0s 1 ^^
P— 4





ro O r-l^o r- oo olio ^* ^Hiin
fO ift |o^ r-4 «-*|rO |




r* in co m in  in — i|!•<»• m M< ^l|'
-------
                       o
                       00
                                                          g
                                                                  R
W
o
    Q_


    O
    o.

    c:
o
>
u_
O




P



C£.
LU

O


di



o

O

IT
    O


    Q
    o
    o
    O



    O
    a:
    UJ
    a.
I/I
w_ l-
o >>


aj
•ZL
73 S •
*•£«'
75 3
c o —
.° ^ '
3 o ~
•g"SS!
LU o 1
32 0
u_
X
O)
^s





-





1

1

























1




1

1



L










c








c





c







I







1




























Q






:






f L
1

1





[





m
[


i
















i









i














i














i

••
















i



















L





C
!




C
1



ro
s
CD
0

                                         a>
                                         en
                                         tr
                                                                                                  O
                                                                 .32

-------
 0)
Pi
               O  O —I
       I    -
                                            o  o
 o
 o
.£
 o
to
 I
 
§
1— 1
o
• >i.
ro >•*
(D MH
l-< O
JO
rt ti
H 0
•r-4
•+J
rt
a
3
u
u
O
m
O
CO
-•-I
CO
>^
1 — 1
52

CO
t, 	 .
M r— 
tl
rd
PU
•a
(D
CO
O
s-
w
i
:>,
i— i
tional
«»
a
3
o
u
0

fi
|
•^ •«
rt W
TO *
»— 1
PU

4-1
a
V
T)
3
+->
CO

(U
«M
•«H
£
O
CO
3
0
K


XI
.
o
i-H
OH
6
A 
                                                    n)
                                                    a
                                                    3
                                                    O
                                                    u
                                                   O
                                                           o
                                                           CD
                                                           *—i
                                                           W
                                                                              CO
                                                                       cu
                                                                      rt
                                                                                            m  oolro
w
                  (M  ^H

                  CO  ^H
                         O  00  CM
                             m  ro
                                                   O
                                                   r-
                                                                                     o
                                                                              cu  a
                                                                              3   3
                                                                              O   O
                                                                              ^   h
                                                                             O  O

                                                                              (U   0)
                                                                              &o  &o

                                                                             <  <
W
co
B!
W
i-s


W
 g'g'
 o   o
 ^   M
O  O

 0)   o
 W)  CO
CO
w
J
W
O
CO
O
 a, a,  a<
 333
 000
 M  M  M
a  o o

 CD  CD  CD
 M) bfl  GO
                                     W
                                     H
                                     co
                                     <
                                     U
                                     2

                                     5
                          a,  a, (X
                          333
                          o   o  o
                          M   M  M
                         O  O  O

                          O   CD  O
                          be  &0 W)
                                          33

-------
When this value was reached, a new,  clean filter was then exchanged





for the old filter with the particulate matter collected on it.  The used





filter was then folded in half with the  sa.mple on the inside.  This





previously numbered filter was then returned to its original plastic bag




and sealed.  A computer-printed  label was then affixed to the bag and




the identification number recorded in the log book on the data sheet.




Each sample recorded had accompanying data that included initial  and





final times,  rotameter readings and site location.  Notation on wind




direction was also made.  Sample collection continued   for




14 days.  These samples were used for ambient air measurements of




platinum and palladium.  The objective was to collect particulate matter





from as much air as possible (two samplers for 14 days) to insure that the




maximum sensitivity could be achieved,, The intent of the study  was to





report the limits of sensitivity as "less than" values if no platinum or




palladium was detected.




                   In addition to the air sampling at site "C" of L.A.C.S.,




air samples were taken also at the  UCLA Married Student Housing (MSH)




on Sepulveda Blvd.   The samplers  were placed in the playground area




next to MSH  Community Center.  This site was chosen  because,  as with





the "C" site previously mentioned, it was also in the same plane as the





freeway  surface and more importantly v/as in the area  where a large percent*




of the study participants resided.     The    fenced-in playground area




provided a secure  spot for uninterrupted and undisturbed sample




collection.  Air collection times and procedures were the  same as



                                 34

-------
performed at the "C" site.  These filters were used for ambient air
lead measurements.  Ambient air lead data from the LACS was to be
used for most of the study area; however, it was decided that additional
lead data would be needed for the  UCLA MSH area, as this is some two
miles from the LACS site.
                   During the  Los Angeles air  collection period, samples
were also taken in Lancaster,  California.  Air samplers were placed
in the backyards of homes within the community.  Samples were collected
continuously and until the pressure drop registered 40 cfm on the rotameter,
at which time the filter was changed.  These samples were used for Pt
and Pd measurements.  An additional air sampler was run to determine
ambient  air lead levels, and its filter was changed every 24 hours.  Both
types of  samples, continuous and  24-hour,  were collected over  14 days
and ran concurrently with the Los Angeles  samplers.  Data reflecting
sampling times and flow rates were noted and recorded in the log book.
Calculation of the true and total air flow was performed using calibration
sheets previously constructed  for each air  sampling unit.
                  During this 14-day air monitoring period,  one day was
set aside for soil sampling.  Acid washed polyethylene containers were
used for this purpose,  and duplicate samples were taken at each site.
Soil was sampled adjacent to sites "A" & "D".  Surface soil samples were
collected.  Also, on opposite sides of (upwind and downwind) and within
ten feet of the freeway, duplicate  samples were taken.  These sampling
points were between sites "B" and "C"; however, they were much closer  to
the freeway than were the air sampling sites.
                               35

-------
                   Soil samples were also taken at the UCLA MSH complex,





Soil collected approximately 100 feet west of the freeway served as the





control,  as this point was upwind from the freeway.  On the downwind side,





duplicate samples were taken at 20, 100 and 300 feet from the freeway.




The latter two distances, 100' and  300', are both within the  confines of





the MSH complex and approximate  the boundaries of the complex




perpendicular to the freeway. (Figure 8)





                   Samples in Lancaster were taken on a random basis





within residential areas and near the hospital where many of the volunteers




were employed.  Each of the soil samples from Los Angeles and Lancaster





had a computerized label placed on the container after collection which




described the location and  sampling point.





                   Water samples  were collected in one liter acid-




washed polyethylene containers.  Samples were taken from tap water at




the MSH complex, the Veterans Hospital (Wadsworth), and from various




homes in the study areas both in Los Angeles and Lancaster.  Again, each




container had its own individual label affixed for easy referral at data




analysis time .




                   Paint samples were collected from exterior surfaces





of the MSH.  Suitable samples were obtained by scraping the paint down




to the surface using a knife. The paint chips were placed into polyethylene




bags.
                                36

-------
              b.   Mining




                   Environmental sampling was also performed at a




mining and smelting complex in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.  The




International Nickel Company (INGO ) was most cooperative in allowing




SwRI to conduct the survey at their facilities and fully  assisted the  survey




team.




                   Air samples were collected at various points at  the




INCO facilities.  The points  were chosen based on discussions with the




engineering personnel in order that probable sources of Pt and Pd could




be ascertained before  sample collection began.




                   Ambient air  samples describing the background  levels




were collected outside near the  INCO engineering building.  Samplers were




started and ran until the rotameter fell to approximately 40 cfm at which




time a new filter was exchanged for the  soiled filter.   During  the seven-day




collection period, fog  and misty conditions  were present on three days and,




consequently, the samplers were checked more often than usual.




                   Two samplers were operated in the precious metals




building where the various metals are removed from the crushed ore




slurry.   This removal process is one of concentration in which some




metals, especially Pt  and Pd, are shipped in a residue form for




processing at a subsequent facility. The air samplers were placed near




probable sources of Pt and Pd in the room air during the concentrating of




these metals. Particulate matter was collected on each of the filters




until such time as the  rotameter approached 40 cfm, and the filter was



then changed.




                                37

-------
                   Underground mining operations provided another




air sampling point for Pt and Pd.  The rationale for  sampling air in




the mines was to determine if the workers were inhaling these metals




in the dust formed as a result of mining Pt and Pd ore and from the use




of diesel engines operated with catalytic: mufflers.  The Institute survey




team went down into the mines on a tour to observe mining operations




and, more importantly,  visit the sites where the air samplers were




placed.  The samplers were positioned near the various drilling, hauling




and ore crushing processes and were  in operation only during the hours




of greatest activity which was during the day shift.




                   An air  sampler was set up in the  area where




regeneration of the diesel muffler catalytic pellets was accomplished.




The used pellets  are  screened to remove chaff and then are roasted in a




regeneration unit at a temperature of 650°C to remove tar.  During this




roasting period,  the air samples were taken.




                   Water and soil samples were taken during the same




seven-day interval  as were the air samples.  A representative from INCO




collected these samples.







              c.   Refineries
                   Sampling of the environment within a refinery in New




Jersey was performed to characterize the particulate matter with reference




to Pt and Pd.  Two refineries of these precious metals were contacted to




participate in the research study.  One refinery performed their own





                                38

-------
sampling and analyses.  The other refinery also collected  samples,





but the analyses were performed at the SwRI laboratories in San Antonio.




The air in two areas  of the second refinery complex was sampled.





Staplex air samplers were suspended six feet from the floor near the




return air flows in the salts recovery and refinery areas.   The collection




of the sample on preweighed 8" x  10" glass fiber filters took place  for




five consecutive work days.  The  filters were changed every 24 hours,





and the total volume of air sampled was computed  for each of the calibrated





samplers.   Each filter was subsequently vacuum-dried to achieve a




constant  weight before the weight  of the particulate matter  was determined.





Before the  filters  were prepared for analysis, a section (15%) of each





filter was quantitatively removed  and set aside.  This portion was sent




to the refinery for their  analysis.  In addition to these sections of collected




filters, an  additional air sampler was also run by  the company next to one





of the SwRI  samplers.  Air sampling was performed concurrently with the




biological collection from the human volunteers.




                   Environmental sampling other than air was  not performed




due to prior agreement with this company and concurrence of the Project




Officer.







       Z.     Study Participants




              a.   General Procedure





                   The conduct of a survey of this  magnitude requires




considerable advance planning.







                                39

-------
                   Because of the variety and number of specimens





required, an efficient labeling system was needed to ensure that all





the samples were properly collected and processed.  A computerized





labeling  system was used to preprint all labels necessary for  sample




collection and processing at a particular site. As an example,  each




participant had his own shopping bag labelled with his name and





identification number.  Inside the bag were the sample collection containers





which had the participant's name, location (Los  Angeles,  Sudbury, etc.)





identification number, sample type  (urine, feces) and  sample number




(first or second sample).  Prior to  the first meeting with the  participants,




the collection kits were put together.  These kits included two feces




bottles and two urine bottles prelabelled with the above described label.




The sample container kit was then handed out at the first  meeting with




the study participants.




                   Hair samples were collected from  each participant in




fulfillment of the sampling protocol.  The accomplishment of  this task was




performed at the meetings when the volunteers came for  blood collection.




Professional barbers were used.  Two types of hair samples  were taken:




long hair and short hair.   The long  hair was taken from the top  and sides





of the head using thinning shears.  The  short hair sample was taken from





the nape of the neck where hair growth was most recent.  Electric  clippers




were used to collect this sample,  and a  minimum of 1 gram of hair was




required for each type of sample.  It is  obvious  that the continued




participation of the volunteer  could  easily be ended if the hair was  cut
                                40

-------
improperly so as to alter the cosmetic appearance of the participant's




hair.  Therefore, before any hair was collected,  each of the barbers




was given verbal instructions on the type and amount of hair required




and that the appearance of the participant's hair style must not be




changed.




                   Blood collection was carried out by a qualified




medical technologist under the supervision of a physician. While it was




assumed that the medical technologist was familiar with blood collection




procedures, a  strong emphasis was made to preclude faulty technique.




The technologist was advised as to the sources  of contamination in the




collection procedure.




                   Blood samples were collected  by the vacutainer




system using two 10-ml low  lead, heparinized tubes as  supplied by




Becton and Dickinson. A suitable vein in the antecubital region was




chosen, and the area was cleansed using a brisk mechanical  scrubbing




action with the alcohol prep.  If the cleansed area came into  contact with




anything else before the sampling,  the entire procedure was  repeated.




Similarly,  sampling equipment was discarded if contaminated before use.




                   Experience in previous surveys indicated that a




continuing effort was needed  to alleviate any fears or hesitancy on the




part of adults and especially  the children in collection of blood samples.




All procedures were thoroughly explained and questions answered before




blood collection commenced.  A concerted effort was made to insure




that no trauma, either physical or emotional, was experienced  by the






                                41

-------
volunteers. Although every effort was made to collect 10 ml of blood




from young children, in some instances this was not possible.  Some




young children were quite small, and their veins were difficult to collect




blood from even using specially designed syringes. As  this study was on a




voluntary basis, no undue chances were taken with these children, even




if the primary difficulty was the child's noncooperation.




                  After the blood was drawn, the volunteer was




instructed to place his thumb behind the elbow and with the remaining




fingers wrap around the arm and hold the sterile gauze in place.  The




participant was then walked to the waiting area and observed for a few




minutes.  A tape strip bandage was then applied to prevent the puncture




site from becoming infected.  For the children, a  special effort was made




to compliment their  behavior and to provide rewards of  candy or balloons.




                  The blood collected in the vacutainers was immediately




rotated for a few minutes to ensure that the heparin in the tubes would




prevent coagulation from occurring.  The blood sample  was then poured




into an acid-washed,  30-cc polyethylene bottle with the corresponding




label attached and then immediately frozen. The urine  samples were




weighed and the specific gravity factor a,pplied to yield the total volume.




The bottle was then shaken to ensure a homogeneous sample and an aliquot




poured into a  175-ml polyethylene bottle and made to 1% acetic  acid. The




corresponding label  was placed on the bottle which was then put into an




ice chest  with dry ice.   The feces sample was  placed on dry ice as soon as




it was handed to the  survey personnel.  Hair samples were kept at ambient






                                42

-------
temperature.  All samples were held in their respective environments




during shipment to,  and storage at, the  San Antonio laboratories.







              b.  Informed Consent
                   The volunteers selected for study were told about the




project, its purpose, goals and possible connection to their way of life.




The informed consent was presented to them, and it was explained that




this form  is a requirement of the U.S.  Public Health Service whenever




human subjects are employed in research.  Emphasis was placed on the




fact that the signing of this form in no way  affected their right to




withdraw from the program at any time.  Each volunteer was verbally




instructed as follows:




       "The informed  consent form  before  you is a requirement




       of  the U.S.  Public Health Service regulations concerning




       use of human subjects. This form is for your protection.




       When it is completed by your signature and my signature,




       it will serve as a record that I, as a Project Director, have




       been present to answer any of your questions regarding the




       project that I have described, the purposes and intent of the




       program,  as well as a description! of any inconveniences,




       discomforts, and potential risks that may be involved, and




       I have provided you with a description of the benefits




       expected.  I have also assured you that you are free to




       withdraw your consent and discontinue  your participation in






                               43

-------
       the project or activity at any time you wish.  I also




       wish to assure you that your identity in this survey





       will not be disclosed.  If you feel that I have




       accomplished these to your satisfaction and that you are





       willing to participate in  the survey, please sign the




       informed consent."










       The volunteers were then asked to sign the consent form if they





felt that the goals of the project, any possible discomfort to them and




non-disclosure aspects had been explained to their satisfaction.  The





consent form  thus signed by the volunteer was then countersigned by the





project director as the person who informed them. Another participant




in the survey  acted as a witness to the above signatures.  At present,




these signed informed consents  are on file at SwRI in the  office of the




principal investigator.  Access  to the names of these volunteers  has been




limited to the  principal investigator and his project staff.  A copy of the




form used  for informed consent is shown in  Figure 3.







              c.   Information  Sheets





                   After the informed consents were  completed,  the





participants in the study were given a detailed explanation of the  schedule




for collection  of samples. Sample containers for urine and feces collections




were then handed out.  Usually, a small group (5-10 people) had  the




collection procedures explained to them, and in this way the time spent
                                44

-------
              Figure 3. VOLUNTEER'S INFORMED CONSENT


          SOUTHWEST  RESEARCH  INSTITUTE
          8500 CULEBRA  ROAD •  POST OFFICE DRAWER 28510  •  SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78284


 I.    	
 residing at  (street address,  city,  zip code)	

 hereby acknowledge and certify to the following:

      i.   That I hereby volunteer and  consent to participate as a human test subject in
 an experiment designed to determine exposure to environmental pollutants entitled,
 "Determination of Baseline Requirements for Platinum and Palladium in Human Tissue".

      2.   That I have been given, in my opinion, an adequate explanation of the nature,
 duration and purpose of the experiment, the means by which the experiment will be
 conducted and any possible inconveniences,  hazards, discomforts,  risks, and adverse
 effects on my health which could result from my participation therein;

      3.  That I have been informed of all appropriate alternative procedures,  if any
 exist,  that might be advantageous to me;

      4.  That I understand my questions concerning procedures which affect me will
 be answered fully and promptly;

      5.  That I understand that I have the right to withdraw my consent and to discontinue
 participation in this experiment at any  time without prejudice regardless of the status of
 the experiment and regardless of the effect of such withdrawal on the objectives and
 results which the experiment is designed to achieve; and I also  understand that my
 participation in the experiment may be terminated at any time by the investigator in charge
 of the project or the physician  supervising the project regardless of my wishes in the
 matter;

      6.  That I hereby understand and agree that the samples  collected from me will be
 analyzed for their content  of trace metals  (platinum, palladium and lead), and that these
 are the only tests that will be made on  these samples and that no medicinal compounds
 will be analyzed.

      7.  That I attained the age of	years on my last birthday which was	
                          , and that I am executing this Volunteer's Informed Consent as
my free act and deed.

          Executed this 	 day of	,  19
Executed in my presence and in
the presence of each other.
              Witness
                                               Volunteer
                                              Person informing volunteer and obtaining
                                              volunteer's consent
                SAN ANTONIO. HOUSTON, CORPUS CHRIST). TEXAS. AND WASHINGTON, D.C.
                                     45

-------
              VOLUNTEER'S INFORMED CONSENT
                        (page 2 )
If subject is a minor,  complete the following,

Subject is a minor (age	).



Father



Mother



Guardian
Other person and relationship
                              46

-------
at this meeting could be kept to a minimum.  It was emphasized to




each volunteer that accurate information could only be obtained if




directions were followed completely. Incomplete sampling would




produce incomplete information,  and therefore the success of the research





project depended on their complete cooperation.




                   The urine collection began in  the evening after supper,





generally between 6 and 8 PM.  Prelabeled,  2-liter wide-mouth poly-





ethylene bottles were given to each participant for the urine collection.




These containers had been cleaned in an acid bath containing 4N HC1 and





3N HNC>3 for eight hours, then rinsed at least six times with deionized




water  and finally dried in a  laboratory oven.  The subjects were told to




collect urine through the next morning.   The sample was then brought to




the place  designated for blood collection or dropped off at a collection





point.  The second sample collection began that evening after supper and




continued until the following morning.





                   Instructions for fecal specimens were also given.




Again, the volunteers were cautioned against putting anything into these




specially  cleaned containers other than their own feces. Toilet paper or




urine were to be avoided. During the same  period as  the urine  collection,




the volunteers were told to collect all of their fecal  specimens.   No




restriction was placed on the volunteer's diet.  Verbal instructions  for




the proper collection for each of the samples was supplemented by a





printed instruction sheet included in the bag with  the containers given to




each individual.





                                47

-------
                   When each subject had completed the sample




collections, he was paid for his participation.  Each volunteer was told




that he would receive a summary of the results.  Individual values were




not to be given.




                   The procedure used at the refineries for collection of




samples differed somewhat from those of the baseline and mining areas.




At both refineries, blood and urine samples were collected in conjunction




with an annual physical examination of the employees.  Collections were




carried out by the companies.  At one of the  refineries, an information form




was filled out by each employee listing name, age,  sex, job title, length




of employment with the company, shift worked, and smoking habits. An




identification number was assigned to each employee and this number




incorporated on each of the samples  collected.




                   The procedures used at this refinery were as follows:




Acid-washed urine collection containers showing participants'  names were




handed out to each volunteer.  They were given verbal and written




instructions on the proper collection of samples.  Shift workers  from the




three shifts at the plant volunteered; thus, the collection period varied




according to shift. For the day shift, they were told to begin collection




of their samples in the evening (generally between 6:00-9:00 PM).




Collection  continued through the  night  and included the first sample upon




arising in the morning.  The second  shift (4:00 P.M. to 12:00 Midnight)




began their collection after work and continued until the first specimen




after arising was collected. For the personnel of the third  shift






                                48

-------
(11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.),  the first specimen after rising was collected.





In each case, the workers were asked to bring the urine samples to the




nurse's station after collection was completed.  Each specimen was





subsequently weighed, and an aliquot (maximum of 175 ml) was acidified




to 1% acetic acid.  These aliquots were then immediately frozen.  An




additional aliquot of each sample was also prepared for the company in




the manner prescribed above.





                   Collection of blood was performed by medical technologists




employed at a local hospital.





                   Blood collection took place at the plant and during




working hours with the employees being scheduled at the convenience of





the plant's production  schedule.  For the day-shift personnel, appointments





were made for every 10  minutes,  and this schedule was posted as a





reminder to each participant.  Blood sampling was begun at  1 P.M. and




continued until all volunteers from the day shift had their blood drawn.




However, before blood collection began, each employee was  instructed to




wash his arms thoroughly with soap and water lest any trace  amount of




Pt and Pd contaminate his blood sample. If the arm was still dirty after




the medical technologist had washed the antecubital area with an alcohol




swab,  the arm was rewashed with additional soap and water.   Standard




blood drawing techniques were used with the vacutainer system





employing two 10-ml heparinized, low-lead vacutainers.  The blood in




each of the two low-lead vacutainers was poured into acid-washed 30-cc





polyethylene bottles as soon  as practical after collection. One blood
                                49

-------
sample was frozen and the other retained by the refinery.  The SwRI





samples were shipped frozen in dry ice to San Antonio and kept frozen





until analysis.




                   Autopsy samples were collected in Los Angeles and




in Sudbury. Twenty-five gram samples of muscle,  liver, kidney, spleen,





lung and fat were collected by a pathologist in  a hospital in the area.




Unsuccessful attempts were made to secure autopsy samples from





accidental deaths through Medical Examiner's offices. Each pathologist




was given sample containers with a label that was to be filled in for




information such as age,  sex, ethnic origin, cause  of death and smoking





history if known.  The pathologists were advised as to the intended





purpose of these samples, and each was instructed  on the precautions to




follow to prevent contamination.  All samples  were frozen as soon as





possible following  collection and kept frozen until analyzed.




                   Ten autopsy cases (5 male  - 5 female) were collected




in Los Angeles, and ten were collected in Sudbury (all male).  The autopsy




cases in Los Angeles were from  persons of different ages (young to elderly)




that resided in Los Angeles prior to death. The autopsy  cases from




Sudbury were  restricted to individuals that had been employed as miners,





ore processors, etc. in the mining operations in Sudbury.
                                50

-------
D.     Analytical Methods


       1.    Literature Review


             Review of the literature prior to 1974 revealed very few


references to Pt or Pd concentrations in biological samples.   Generally,


where references were made to Pt or Pd,  neutron activation analysis

                                                              (2)
was  the only method able  to estimate the concentration present.


             There are a  number  of references in the literature for


Pt and Pd analysis on metallurgical,  geological and other types of


samples  using atomic absorption spectrophotometry; however, the levels


of the two metals  are much higher in these  samples than in biological


samples.


             Increased interest in Pt and Pd over the last two years


has produced several recent papers dealing specifically with Pt and Pd

                                                               (3)
in biological samples.  A  paper by Yoakum, Stewart and Sterrett


gave an emission  spectrochemical method  to determine  Pt, Pb and Mn


in rat tissues.  These investigators  stated that the emission spectrochemical


method and flameless atomic absorption methods  could not reach a level


of sensitivity sufficient to quantitate residual concentrations of Pt  in


tissues without preconcentration treatment.

                   (4)
             LeRoy    stated that, to determine Pt  in one gram of wet


tissue by the graphite analyzer, there would have  to be a minimum


concentration of 0.25 ppm for reproducible results.  This was based


upon direct injection of the digested tissue into the graphite analyzer.


LeRoy also mentioned the  use of aliphatic secondary amines (in xylene) as




                                51

-------
extractants for preconcentrating Pt and Pd prior to analysis.  He stated


that methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) could be used to extract Pt but did not


recommend it.


             An excellent review of analytical methods for determining

                                                       (5)
Pt and Pd in biological tissue by Bumgarner and Yoakum    summarized


the situation regarding "flameless" atomic absorption analysis by


saying a preconcentration scheme would still be necessary.


             Analysis of Pt and Pd using the graphite analyzer ("flameless'


and atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) has been reported on

                                             (6-8)
aqueous  solutions both directly and by extract.       Adriaenssens and

      (9)
Knoop   have reported the optimal conditions for analysis  of three  noble


metals (including  Pt) in the graphite  analyzer.   The reported sensitivity


and detection limit for Pt were 1  ng and 1. 1 ng  ,  respectively.

                    (10)
             Guerin     reported some interferences that can affect the


analysis of Pt and Pd  in the graphite analyzer.  He also mentioned the


extraction  of Pt and Pd using Aliquat 336 in MIBK from HC1 solution.


Guerin said there was no solvent  enhancement effect as there is with


flame analysis using organic  solvents.  The reported absolute detection


limit using a 10(j.l injection of the extract was 0.005 ng Pd and 0.05 ng Pt.


                   „   -                      (11)
             Janouskova, Nehasilova and Sychra    examined the effect


of 19 elements and 6 acids  on the graphite furnace determination of Pt.


They found that only ruthenium,  strontium and nitric acid interfere.


The reported sensitivity was 0.8 ng for 1% absorption.
                                52

-------
       2.    Instrumentation





             All analyses are performed on a Perkin-Elmer Model 306




Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer modified (Perkin-Elmer Optical





Modification Kit No. 040-0286) to reduce the "light scattering" effect





caused by the graphite furnace.   A Deuterium arc  background corrector





is routinely used to compensate for non-specific background absorption.




Absorption peaks are recorded with a Perkin-Elmer Recorder Model 056





with a 10 mv range.




             Flameless analyses are done with a Perkin-Elmer HGA-2000





Graphite Furnace.  Flame analyses are by aspiration of the sample into




an air-acetylene flame using a 3-slot burner head.





             Calculation of analytical curves (method of additions) and





determination of unknown sample concentrations are done on a





Hewlett-Packard Programmable Calculator  Model  9810A.




             Ashing of tissue samples for Pb determination is  performed




on a LTA505 low temperature asher manufactured  by LFE Corporation,




Waltham, Massachusetts.




             Evaporation of urine and water samples is carried out with




a Rotavapor-RE/A, Brinkmann Instruments, Inc.,  Westbury, New York.




       3.    Reagents





             All reagents are analytical grade unless otherwise indicated.




             Atomic absorption standard solutions (1,000 ppm) for Pt





and Pd are the K^Ptd/ and PdCl?, respectively, from Ventron Corp. ,








                               53

-------
Alfa Products, Danvers, Massachusetts.  Atomic absorption standard





for Pb (1,000 ppm) is from Fisher Scientific Co. , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.




       4.    Selection of Analytical Methodology




             Several important criteria were considered in the development





of methodologies for Pt,  Pd and Pb analyses of biological material.




             (a)  Since the expected concentration of Pt and Pd in the





             samples would be very low,  some preconcentration procedure





             would be needed.




             (b)  The methods developed had to be adaptable to large




             numbers of samples.




             (c)  The method must be fast,  simple, and accurate.





             (d)  If possible, the sample workup would be for all three




             elements to avoid duplication of effort.





             (e)  The time available for methodology development would




             be limited.




             The final criterion, being  the most severe, limited the




development to selecting procedures from the literature and adapting




them to biological samples and atomic absorption analysis.




       5.    Platinum and Palladium Methodology





             a.   Extraction Procedure





                 The above restrictions placed on the analytical methods





development of Pt, Pd and Pb   directed the main  emphasis to finding





a suitable extraction procedure which would quantitatively remove Pt,




Pd and Pb from the  sample matrix.






                                54

-------
                   Ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate  (APDC)


 chelation with subsequent extraction of the metal complexes into methyl


 isobutyl ketone (MIBK) was tried on aqueous spike solutions.  Very erratic



 results were  obtained with Pt,  but Pb  and Pd extracted very well at pH 5. 0.


 Recoveries of Pd ranged from  68 to 87%.


                   Extraction of the stannous-chloro complexes of Pt with


 MIBK or ethyl acetate gave recoveries of 80 to 120% at spike concentration


 of 0. 8 ppm but only 40-50% at 0. 1 ppm.  Pd and Pb were not extracted  under


 these conditions.


                   The extraction of Pt and Pd stannous-chloro complexes


 with high molecular weight amines  (HMWA) appeared to fulfill most of the


 requirements listed earlier for an acceptable extraction procedure.   Lead,


 however, did  not extract under the  conditions used for Pt and Pd.  Our


 method was patterned after those of Khattak and Magee.


                   Biological samples have to be digested or ashed prior


 to determining the analyte metal(s), and this provides a convenient means


 of extracting with a HMWA.   The digest or ash is  either in, or solubilized in, an


 acid, solution, therefore time-consuming pH adjustments are unnecessary, since


 the amine functions in an acidic environment.  The overall reaction for


 this type of extraction is:
n[RNH3V]      +  [MX]"'      ==: ([RNH3+]   [MXJn")      + nA~         (2)

            (°rg)          (Aq)             n        (org)       (Aq)
where  H  A"       is HC1 and MX      represents the stannous-chloro
             (Aq)                   (Aq)

                            (14)
complex of Pt(IV) or Pd (II).


                                55

-------
                   The procedure for extraction is essentially the same




for all types of samples.   The sample is either digested with acids or ashed




in a muffle furnace.  Samples digested with acid are  evaporated to 1 to  2 ml




on a hot plate under N? and then reconstituted and evaporated three times




with 5 ml of concentrated HC1.   Following the last evaporation, the sample




is cooled  and  transferred to an extraction vessel using 3N HC1.




                   Ashed samples are solubilized with aqua regia, evaporate*




to 1-2 ml on a hot plate under N? and then carried through the evaporation-




reconstitution procedure described above.




                   Once the sample has been transferred to an extraction




vessel (15-20 ml screw-cap Pyrex centrifuge  tube), the sample is adjusted




to approximately 10 ml with deionized water or 3 N HC1.  The solution




should be approximately 3 N HC1 for extraction.




                   One milliliter of 25% SnCl^ solution (in 3NHC1) is then




added, and the sample is vigorously shaken for 30  seconds.  A 1-ml aliquot




of 0. 02M  tri-n-octylamine (xylene solution) is  added,  and the sample is





shaken for 30 minutes followed by centrifuging for 15 minutes at




3,000 RPM.   The octylamine layer (top) is removed with an Eppendorf




pipet and  placed in a 4-ml screw-cap vial.




                   A quick second extraction of the sample is carried out





with 0. 5 ml of xylene, and this is added to  the  original extract.




                   The extract is evaporated to dryness under N-,  on a





hot plate using low heat.  Once the extra.ct  is dry, it is capped and




stored until ready for analysis.  Just prior  to analysis,  the  sample is




reconstituted  with 0. 1 ml (100 41!) xylene and mixed well.  A 5-|xl






                                 56

-------
or 10-jjtl aliquot of the extract is injected into the graphite analyzer




(HGA-2000) for determination of Pt and Pd.




                   The acid concentration of the extract solution effects




recovery of both Pt and Pd.  Figure 4 illustrates that increasing the




acid concentration above 0.5N causes a decrease in recovery of Pd,




while an increase above 8N causes a marked decrease in recovery of Pt.




An approximately 3N HC1 extract was decided upon,  since it  provided




good recovery of both Pt and Pd and was convenient to use for extracting




a large quantity of samples.




                  Some other elements were investigated as to their




effect upon the extraction of Pt  and Pd.  Table 4 shows that only  Cu at




2, 000 ppm proivded a significant effect upon a 50 ng Pt ( 1 ppm)  extract




signal.




                  Pd (37.5ng)  (0.075 ppm) was seriously affected by




Fe (2,000 ppm) and Cu  (2,000 ppm)  as illustrated by Table 4. Mn also




enhanced the Pd signal.




                  Another source of interference with the Pt and Pd




extraction is the concentration of the SnCl? solution used to form the




anionic  species prior to extraction.   Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the




effect upon Pt and Pd in a 3N HC1 solution.  There is a marked decrease




in the response obtained from 50 ng  of Pt extract and 37.5 ng  of Pd




extract  as the concentration of the SnCl   solution is increased.   This




effect was not observed until late in the study,  and, therefore, the 25%




SnCl  concentration was used.





                               57

-------
                                            (SJ
58

-------
    TABLE 4.  EFFECT OF ELEMENTS UPON EXTRACTION
                   OF Pt and Pd FROM 3 N HC1
                 Concentration
Element
   Fe                2000                  0               ++

   Mn                 500                  0               +

   Cu                2000                  +               ++

   Pb                1000                  0               0

   Cd                  500                  0               0

   Zn                2000                  0               0
(1) Concentration In 3M HC1 solution Pt and Pd extracted from.
(2) Concentration of Pt = 1 ppm (50 ng of  extract analyzed).
(3) Concentration of Pd = 0.075 ppm (37.  5 ng of extract analyzed).
(4) + = enhancement of signal
   0 = no effect.
                               59

-------
  100
  90
  80
   70
   60
JS

•jf  50-
ffi
rt

-------
     150
     135
     120
     105
    E

    c
   • *+

   4-»


    00
   • H


   ffi
      90
      75
      60
      45
      30
      15
                     0.05 Abs
                             •4-
4-
                                     %SnCl2
                                                                         6'0
FIGURE 6.  EXTRACTION OF Pd (12. 5 ng) FROM 3N HC1  USING VARIOUS


            CONCENTRATIONS OF SnCL  SOLUTION  (3N HC1)
                                         L.I
                                       61

-------
                 Shaking times were examined for the Pt and Pd extraction


procedure.  Little or no effect was observed on Pt extraction when the


solution was shaken from 5-60 minutes.  An increase in the  Pd


extraction was observed with shaking times greater than 5 minutes.


The maximum was reached in 15 minutes.

                                                    (12,13)
                 The  procedure of Khaittak and Magee        was followed


closely during the earlier part of the program, but as improvements


upon the extraction procedure were made,  they were incorporated  into


the analysis of the samples.  Therefore, improved limits of detection


of Pt and Pd for a sample matrix from different locations (see Table 5)


were realized as the program progressed.


                 The  extraction procedure for Pt and Pd is  limited by the


fact that the anionic exchange liquid  tri-n-octylamine (TOA), creates


an excessive amount of "smoke" during the atomization step in the HGA-2000


This restricts the total amount of extract that can be analyzed and thereby


limits  the sensitivity of the method.


                 Reducing  the concentration of the anionic liquid is a


method of reducing the excessive "smoke".  The original procedure of


Khattak and Magee called for a 0.2M TOA  (in benzene).  Below a


0.02M TOA (in xylene),  the extraction of Pd became very erratic.

                                  (15,16)
According to Davidson and Jameson,        this would be expected since


the concentrations of other  anions present will limit the extraction of the


desired anions.  Reducing the concentration of the anionic liquid would, in effect,


present fewer available exchange sites for  which the analyte anionic


species could compete.

                               62

-------
          TABLE 5.  LIMITS OF DETECTION OF Pt and PD
                    IN BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES(1>
Sample
Type
Blood


Urine


Hair

Feces

Liver

Kidney

Spleen

Lung

Muscle

Fat

Study
Area
Baseline
Mining
Refinery
Baseline
Mining
Refining
Baseline
Mining
Baseline
Mining
Baseline 1
Mining )
Baseline )
Mining ?
Baseline )
Mining J
Baseline )
Mining /
Baseline )
Mining )
Baseline )
Mining /
Pt
ppm
0. 031
0. 0014
0.0014
0. 006
2 x 10~5
0. 0001
0. 05
0. 0019
0. 002
7 x ID'5
0.00024

0.0026

0.0013

0. 0013

0. 0009

0.0013

Pd
ppm
0. 009
0. 0004
0. 0004
0. 003
7 x ID'6
0. 0002
0. 02
0. 0006
0. 001
2 x ID"5
0. 0006

0. 0067

0.0033

0. 0033

0. 0022

0.0016


Sample Size
10 ml
15 ml
15 ml
1000 ml composite
1000 ml composite
150 ml
11.5 grams composite
11.5 grams composite
300 grams composite
300 grams composite
55 grams wet tissue

5 grams wet tissue

10 grams wet tissue

10 grams wet tissue

15 grams wet tissue

10 grams wet tissue

(1) 2X background noise = limit of detection.
                                63

-------
                 The absolute amounts of Pt and Pd, which may be





quantitated on the Perkin-Elmer Model 306, are 1. 07 ng and 0. 33 ng,





respectively.   Improvement in the limit of detection therefore necessitated





using larger sample quantities.  This was achieved by compositing a large




number of small samples to get one larger sample.   Compositing of





samples was done for hair, urine, feces, and air.  Table  5 gives the




limit of detection of Pt and Pd for each sample matrix and location.





The limit of detection for the composite samples is based  on the absolute




amounts of Pt and Pd  detectable with the P-E 306 and the  size of the




composite used.




             b.  Biological Samples




                 (1)  Blood





                      Whole blood samples were digested  with HNC^





(70: 30) in a Vycor beaker  on a hot plate (150°C) with a flow of N^.





Table 5 gives the volume of blood analyzed from each sampling site.




The blood was  evaporated  to 1-2 ml and reconstituted 3X with  5  ml of




concentrated HC1.  Following the last evaporation, the samples were




removed from  the hot plate and allowed to cool before rinsing  into an




extraction vessel with 3N HC1.  The extraction procedure  outlined





earlier for Pt and Pd was  followed to remove these elements from the





digested matrix.





                      The blood digests from the baseline study were




extracted with  0.2M TOA (in benzene).  Only 3/5 of the  extract solution







                               64

-------
could be recovered for evaporation-reconstitution because of the



solubility of benzene in the aqueous phase.  The mining (Sudbury) and



refinery blood digests were extracted •with 0.02M TOA (in xylene).



All of the organic extract was  recovered for subsequent evaporation-



reconstitution as outlined in the extraction procedure.



                      Recovering all of the TOA  extract,  a substantial



improvement  in the  limit of detection was realized (Table  5).  Precision



also improved for Pt and Pd analysis.



                 (2)  Urine



                      Composites  of urine from each sampling site



(except the refinery) were made from the individual overnight  samples.



Composites were approximately  1  liter  in volume.



                      A rotary evaporator was used to reduce the composite



urine samples to dryness.  The urine residue was solubilized with aqua



regia (50 ml) and rinsed into a Vycor beaker.  The sample was evaporated



to dryness on a hot plate (150°C) under  N2.  The  dried residue was then



ashed in a muffle furnace at 500°C using Mg(NO  )  as an ashing  aid.



The ash was then solubilized with aqua regia and  again evaporated to near



dryness on a hot plate (150 C) under N  .  The sample was reconstituted-
                                     LJ


evaporated with 5 ml of concentrated HC1.   Following  the last evaporation,



the sample was transferred to an extraction vessel with 3N HCl and



extracted according to the procedure outlined earlier  for Pt and  Pd.



                      Table 6  gives the spike levels used with the



composite  samples.




                               65

-------
            TABLE 6.    Pt and Pd SPIKE LEVELS OF
                     COMPOSITE SAMPLES
Quantity
of Sample Microliters of Spike Concentration
Sample Analyzed Solution Used' Pt
Urine 1 liter

Feces 300 grams

Hair 11.5 grams


500
100
500
100
50
100
200
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0010
0002
0033
0007
0087
0174
0348
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
in ppm
Pd
0005
0001
0017
0003
0043
0087
0174
Spike solution:  2 jig/ml Pt and 1  jig/ml Pd.
                             66

-------
                 (3)  Hair




                      Composites  of hair were made from the "long hair"




samples collected at each sampling site.  The composite samples consisted




of about 12 grams of hair  (see Table 6).





                      The hair was washed with 0. 12M sodium lauryl




sulfate  solution and rinsed 3X with deionized water,  followed by an  isopropyl





alcohol wash and by three rinsings with deionized water.  The washed hair




was then transferred to a  polyethylene beaker and placed in an oven




at 60  C to dry.





                      The dry hair sample was weighed into a Vycor





beaker, and 30 ml  of HC1O.: HNO3 (1: 1) was added.   The sample was




allowed to stand at room temperature 1-2 hours before placing on a hot





plate  (150 C) for evaporation-digestion.  The volume of sample digest





was reduced to 1-2 ml and reconstituted-evaporated 3X with concentrated





HC1.  Following the last evaporation, the sample was rinsed  into an




extraction vessel with 3N HC1 and  extracted by the previously outlined




procedure for Pt and Pd.




                 (4)  Feces




                      Fecal samples were composited for the baseline study




and the  mining study.  The composites ranged from  300g to 500g (Table 6).




The samples were  partially digested with concentrated HNOo  overnight in




polyethylene jars.  Following this  partial digestion,  the  samples were




further  digested by adding small aliquots to a 400-ml Teflon beaker on
                                67

-------
a hot plate (125-150 C) and digesting-evaporating until all of the sample





had been completely digested.   The digestion was continued by adding




      until a clear amber solution remained.  The  solution was then
     o




evaporated down until solids were observed forming in the digest.  Then





10 ml HC1O4 was carefully added and the digestion continued until 2-3 ml





remained.  The sample was then filtered through a glass -fiber filter




with rinsing of 6N HC1.  The filtrate was evaporated to near dryness on





a hot plate and reconstituted-evaporated 3X with concentrated HC1.




Following the last evaporation, the  sample was transferred to an





extraction vessel and extracted by the procedure given for Pt and Pd.




                 (5)  Tissues





                      Tissue samples from the baseline and mining studies





were homogenized using a VirTis "45" Homogenizer with stainless  steel




blades.  Approximately 5-55 grams of tissue (wet) were homogenized,





depending upon the type (see Table 5).




                      The tissue homogenates were weighed into a Vycor




beaker and placed in a vacuum oven at 40-50 C overnight.   The dry




samples were then mixed with Mg(NO,)-, ashing aid and placed in a muffle




furnace at 500  C.  The samples were a.shed until a -white ash remained.





The  ash was solubilized with aqua regia and evaporated-reconstituted 3X




with concentrated HC1. Following the last evaporation,  the sample was




transferred to an extraction vessel with 3N HC1.   Extraction followed




the procedure outlined earlier for Pt  and Pd.
                               68

-------
             c.  Environmental Samples




                 (1)  Air Samples




                      Air samples from the baseline, mining and refinery





studies were each composited (Table 7).  The composited glass-fiber filters





(20. 3 x 25.4 centimeters) were cut into approximately  1-cm squares,




added to a 2-liter boiling flask, and 100-250 ml of aqua regia was added.




The amount of acid added depended upon the number of filters composited.





Samples were  refluxed for 24 hours, filtered through glass-fiber filters,




and the filtrates were evaporated to several milliliters on a hot plate




(150-200°C) under N£.  The remaining sample was then reconstituted-





evaporated 3X with concentrated HC1.  Following the last evaporation,





the sample was transferred  to an extraction vessel with 3N" HC1.  Extraction




of Pt and Pd followed the procedure given earlier.





                 (2)  Soil Samples





                      Soil samples were dried in an oven (60 C) for





48 hours before being ground with a mortar and pestle.  Five grams of




the dried,  ground soil was weighed into a 250-ml Vycor beaker and digested




with 50 to  150 ml of aqua regia on a hot plate (200°C) with constant  stirring.




The samples were removed  from the hot plate,  cooled, and filtered with




a glass-fiber filter.  The filtrate was collected in a Vycor beaker, evaporated




under N£ to 1-2 ml and reconstitute-evaporated 3X with 5 ml of concentrated





HC1.  Following the last evaporation,  the sample was rinsed into an





extraction vessel with 3N HC1 and extracted by the procedure given earlier




for Pt  and Pd.






                               69

-------
         TABLE 7.  LIMITS OF DETECTION OF Pt and Pd
                 IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
Sample
Type
Water
Soil
Study Area
Baseline
Mining
Baseline
Mining

8
5
0
Pt
x 10"
x 10"
.0008
Pd
c Pprn
pprn
ppm
2.
1.
0.
4 x
5 x
10-5
lO"5
ppm
ppm
0007 ppm
Sample
250
400
10 g
ml
ml
Size
sample
sample
dry sample
Air
Baseline exposed  0.05 pg/m3    0.062 pg/m3
Baseline control   0.11 pg/m3    0.033 pg/m3
          Mining
          Refinery
                  0.003(j.g/m3   0.003(j.g/m3
                             3   0.003jjig/m3
47424 m  compos
9988 m3 composi

2111 m  composi
2111 m3 composi
                               70

-------
                  (3)  Water Samples



                      Up to 400 ml of water was used in the determination



for Pt and Pd.  The sample volume was reduced to less than 10 ml in a



rotary evaporator under reduced  pressure and 70 C heat.  Using



approximately 25 ml of aqua regia, the sample Was rinsed  into a Vycor



beaker and digested-evaporated to 1-2 ml, under N->,  on a  hot-plate



(150 C).  The  sample was reconstituted-evaporated 3X with 5 ml



concentrated HC1 and transferred to an extraction vessel with 3N HC1.



Extraction of Pt and Pd followed the procedure given earlier.



       6.    Lead Methodology



             a.  Biological Samples



                 (1)  Blood



                 The procedure of Hwang, Ullucci and Mokeler


                                                                (18)
using modifications  from the method of Mitchell, Ryan and  Aldous



was used to determine the Pb concentration in whole blood  samples.






                 Using an  Eppendorf pipet, a 1. 0-ml aliquot of whole



blood was transferred into  a 5-ml centrifuge tube.  One milliliter of



a hemolyzing-chelating solution consisting of a 5% Triton X-100



(octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol, Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pa. )



solution  containing 2% ammonium pyrrolidine  dithiocarbamate (APDC)



was added, and the sample  was mixed vigorously for 5 minutes and



allowed to stand 10 to 15 minutes  to ensure complete hemolysis of the
                               71

-------
blood; this was followed by the addition of 1.0 ml of water-saturated



MIBK.  The sample was then shaken for 3 minutes and centrifuged



for 5 minutes at 3,000 RPM.   The organic layer was then analyzed



for Pb by injecting 10-|al aliquots into the HGA-2000 graphite furnace.



                  (2)  Urine



                      The procedure used for urinary Pb determinations


                                          (19)
was based upon that of Kubasik and Volosin .



                      A 10-ml aliquot of acidified urine (1% acetic acid



added as a preservative) was pipetted into a 25-ml centrifuge tube.



Using NaOH,  the pH was adjusted to 7.0, and 5 ml of tris(hydroxymethyl)-



aminomethane buffer (pH 7.0) was added.  One milliliter of a 1% APDC



solution was added along with 1.0 ml  of water-saturated MIBK.   The



sample was mixed for 10 minutes and then centrifuged for  10 minutes



at 3,000 RPM,  and the organic layer was removed for Pb analysis



by injecting aliquots into the HGA-2000 graphite furnace.



                  (3)  Hair



                      Hair samples were washed by a modification of


                (20)
Hammer, et al.     method.



                      All of the hair sample  collected (usually  1  to 4 grams)



was cut into approximately 1-cm lengths with stainless  steel scissors.



The hair was  placed in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask, and a sufficient



amount of 0. 12% sodium lauryl sulfate solution was added to completely
                                72

-------
cover the hair.   The flask was then placed on a mechanical shaker for





1 hour; then the solution was decanted off, and the hair was rinsed




with deionized water until no trace of the surfactant remained.  The




hair was then washed 2X with isopropyl alcohol and rinsed 3X with





deionized water.  The washed hair was placed in a polyethylene beaker,





covered with thin paper to keep contamination  out, and placed in an




oven  (60 C) until dry.





                      A 1-g sample  of the washed and dried hair was




weighed into a Vycor beaker and digested on a hot plate with




HNC^: HCIO^ (50: 50).  The digest was evaporated until dense  fumes





of perchlorate were given off and was then allowed to cool.  The digest




was filtered with a glass-fiber filter using 0. IN HNOo  as rinse.  The





filtrate was collected in a 10-ml volumetric  flask and made to volume





with 0. IN HNO3-  This sample was analyzed for Pb by aspirating





into an air/acetylene flame.




                  (4)  Feces




                      A 1. 5-g aliquot of homogenized feces was digested




with concentrated HNO^ in a Teflon bomb designed by Rantala and




Loring.   ' The bomb was placed on a hot plate at 1 50 C for  1 hour,




removed and allowed to cool to room temperature before attempting




to open.  T'~>e digest was quantitatively rinsed  through a glass-fiber




filter, and the filtrate was collected in a 10-ml volumetric flask.





Deionized water was used to make the volume  to 10-ml.  This solution
                                73

-------
•was analyzed for Pb by injecting 10-jj.l aliquots into the HGA-2000



graphite furnace.



                 (5)   Tissues



                      Tissue samples  collected in the baseline study



were  analyzed for Pb.  A 10-15-g portion of the tissue •was homogenized



with a VirTis  "45" homogenizer using  stainless steel blades.  An



aliquot of the homogenate (usually l-2g) was weighed into a Pyrex


                                        o
ashing boat, placed in a vacuum oven (60 C) overnight, and finally



placed in a low temperature asher.   The tissue samples were  ashed



under reduced pressure at 400 watts forward power for 4-8 hours.



The remaining ash was then solubilized with IN HNC>3 and rinsed into



a 10-ml volumetric flask.   This final 10-ml solution was then  used  to



determine the Pb content of the tissues by aspirating into an air/acetylene



flame or injecting aliquots  into the graphite furnace.



             b.   Environmental Samples



                 (1)   Air



                      Air samples, collected  on 20. 3- x 25. 4-cm



glass-fiber filters  during the baseline  study, were analyzed for Pb



(Table 8).  A 2. 54- x 20. 3-cm strip of the  filter was cut with stainless



steel  scissors.  The strip was cut into approximately i-cm squares



and placed into a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask.  Two hundred milliliters



of 6 NHC1 was added,  and the sample was shaken for  18-20 hours on



a mechanical shaker.  The  sample was then filtered using a glass-fiber
                                74

-------
filter that had been prewashed with dilute HC1.  The filtrate was


collected in a 250-ml volumetric flask and filled to the mark with


deionized water.  This solution was aspirated into an air-acetylene


flame using spiked working standard, made up in the same acid


concentration, to quantitate the Pb concentration  of the baseline


samples.


                      Verification of this leach method was done by


performing a "total digest" of selected air samples and comparing


with the results obtained with the  leach procedure.   The  total digest


consisted of cutting 2. 54- x 20. 3-cm strips  of the glass-fiber filter


and placing into a 500-ml boiling flask, adding 150-200 ml of aqua regia,


and refluxing for 16-18 hours.  The sample was then filtered and  made


to 250-ml with deionized water.   Analysis of this  solution was by


aspiration into an air-acetylene flame using spiked working standards,


made up at the same  acid strength to quantitate the unknown  samples.


Table 8 shows  there  is little difference between "leaching" the filters


with 6N HC1 and "digesting" with  aqua regia.


                 (2)   Soil


                      Soil samples from the baseline study were analyzed

                               (22)
for Pb by a leaching  procedure.      A 15-20g soil sample was dried


in a low (60  C) temperature oven for 48 hours.  Then a 5-g sample


of the dried soil was  weighed into a  125-ml Erlenmeyer flask, and 50 ml
                               75

-------
    TABLE 8.  COMPARISON OF 6 N HC1 "LEACH" WITH AQUA
      REGIA "DIGEST" OF GLASS-FIBER AIR FILTER FOR Pb

             6N HCL            Aqua Regia         %
Sample       "Leach"            "Digest"        Difference

 Al            7.16                7.23             1.0

 A2            6.52                7.69            15.2
 Bl            6.01                 6.25            3.8

 B2            5.65                 5.99            5.7
                              76

-------
of leaching solution (3: 7 mix of 25% hydroxylamine hydrochloride




and 35% acetic acid) was  added.   The sample was sealed and shaken on




a mechanical shaker for  15 hours.  The leach solution was filtered





through a glass-fiber filter directly into a 2-oz polyethylene  sample





bottle.  Aliquots of the solution were then diluted by an appropriate




factor to maintain the Pb concentration within the linear  range of the





instrument.




                 (3)  Water





                      Water  samples from the baseline study were ,





analyzed for Pb by extracting the ammonium 1-pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate




complex of Pb into methyl isobutyl  ketone (MIBK).




                      A 2-ml aliquot of the water was neutralized (pH 7)





with NaOH and then buffered with Trisma buffer (pH 7).  A 0. 1-ml aliquot




of 1% APDC  solution was added and the sample  shaken for 1 minute.




Then,  1 ml of MIBK was  added and the sample shaken again for 5  minutes.




The organic  layer was  removed and analyzed by injecting 10-|j.l aliquots





into the graphite furnace.




       7.    Calculations and Analytical Data




             a.  Instrument Parameters




                 Table 9  lists the instrument parameters used for




analysis of Pb by the flame method.




                 Table 10 gives the parameters for Pt,  Pd and Pb analyses




on the HGA-2000 graphite furnace.
                                77

-------
           TABLE 9.  INSTRUMENT PARAMETERS FOR LEAD
             DETERMINATION BY AIR/ACETYLENE FLAME
                               Lead Analysis


Spectrophotometer:                        Flame:
  Wavelength	283. 3 nm               Air	30 psi/No. 60
  Source	9 mA                  Acetylene	8 psi/No. 40
  Slit	No. 4 (1.0 mm)         Aspiration rate. .2.5 ml/min.
  Damping	No. 1
  D2 Arc	ON
  Recorder	20  mm/min.
  Scale Expand. . .  Auto Cone, with 5 ppm
                   Pb at full scale
                   also  2. 5 ppm full scale
                                78

-------
       TABLE 10. INSTRUMENT PARAMETERS FOR THE HGA-ZOOO
                   DETERMINATION OF Pt, Pd and Pb
Lead Analysis

Spectrophotometer:

     Wavelength	283 . 3 nm
     Source	9 mA
     Slit	  No. 4 (1.0mm)
     Damping	 No . 1
                     Graphite Furnace:

                     Dry	 25 sec at 100°C
    D-> Arc
ON
    Recorder	  10 mm/min
    Scale Expand ... .IX
.1 ». *-» J.J. «•••*••
Atomize . . .
Tube 	
Gas 	
7 sec at 2100°C
grooved
f^ •*• ^* *•' '•'
N-, at 20 psi, No. 4
                                 (flow meter),  auto
                                 interrupt
Platinum Analysis

Spectrophotometer:

    Wavelength	265. 9 nm
    Source	18 mA
    Slit	No. 4 (1.0mm)
    Damping	No. 1
    D2 Arc	ON
    Recorder	10 mm/min
    Scale Expand. ..  3X
                                          Graphite Furnace:
                                                            sec at 200°C
                                                            sec at 1500°C
                                                                        C
                         Dry	15
                         Ash	 30
                         Atomize. . . 15 sec at 2700 '
                         Tube	Regular
                         Gas	N2 at 20 psi, No.4
                                    (flow meter),
                                    manual interrupt
Palladium Analysis

Spectrophotometer:

    Wavelength	247. 6 nm
    Source	23 mA
    Slit	No. 3  (0.3 mm)
    Damping	 No . 1
    Recorder	  10 mm/min
    Scale Expand. ... 10X
                     Graphite  Furnace:
                         Dry. . . . ,
                         Ash . . . .
                         Atomize
                                                        . 30
                                                        .30
                                                        .15
sec at 150°C
sec at 1500°C
sec at 2700°C
                         Tube	Regular
                         Gas	 N  at 20 psi, No.4
                                    (flow meter),
                                    manual interrupt
                                  79

-------
             b.   Standard Solutions





                 (1)  Platinum and Palladium




                      Quantitation of blood samples for Pt and Pd





was accomplished by spiking  15-ml aliquots of whole blood prior to





digestion with 50(il and 100[j.l  of a combined aqueous standard containing





1.2 p.g/ml  Pt and 0.2  (ig/ml Pd.  These spiked samples  represented





blood concentrations of:  Pt 0.004 |ag/ml and 0.008 |j.g/ml,  Pd 0.00067 p.g/rr




and 0. 0013 (o.g/ml.





                      Composite  samples -were spiked according to




Table 6, using an aqueous standard containing 2 pprn Pt  and 1 ppm Pd.




                      These spiked samples (blood and composites)




were  used  to quantitate the  Pt and Pd  concentrations of the unknown




samples.




                 (2)  Lead





                      Pb spikes were added to each type of sample




matrix according to Table 11.  These spike  samples were used to




establish an analytical working  curve  to determine the analyte




concentration in the unknown  samples.





                      A series  of spike samples were  analyzed before





and after every 10-20  unknown samples.   Both sets of  data from the





spiked samples were used to  construct the analytical working curve




used to quantitate the bracketted unknown  samples.
                               80

-------
             TABLE FT.    Pb SPIKE LEVELS USED TO
                CALCULATE ANALYTICAL  CURVES
         Quantity                   Microliter Volume
         of Sample   Spike Solution   of Spike Solution
Sample  Analyzed      ug/ml           Used
Concentration
   of Pb
 in Samples
Blood 1 ml 10 0
5
10
20
30
Urine 10 ml 10 0
10
20
40
Hair 1 gram 1000 0
5
10
25
Feces 1. 5 grarn 100 0
5
15
30
60
natural cone.
5 p.g/100 ml
10 (j.g/100 ml
20 [jLg/100 ml
30 jj.g/100 ml
natural cone.
10 jig/1
20 jj.g/1
40 ug/1
natural cone.
5 Hg/g
10 ug/g
25 [jLg/g
natural cone.
0.33 !_Lg/g
1.00 ug/g
2.00 ng/g
4.00 jig/g
                                81

-------
             c.   Analytical Data





                 (1)  Limits of Detection





                      The limits of detection for Pt,  Pd and Pb in




the different sample  matrices are  given in Tables 5 and 7.  The




limit of detection represents the concentration of analyte which will





give a signal-to-noise ratio of 2.




                 (2)  Precision





                      Ten determinations made on a  spiked blood





sample gave a Pt concentration of 0.012 |j.g/ml with a standard





deviation of 0. 0004 |ag/ml (C. V = 3. 3%) and a Pd concentration of




0.003 |j.g/ml with a standard deviation of 0. 00012 fxg/ml (C. V. = 4.0%).




                      Lead precision data are listed  in Table 12.




                 (3)  Accuracy





                      Interlaboratory istudies are being planned to ascertain




the accuracy of these methods by techniques involving analytical methods




other than atomic absorption spectrophotometry.




                      Recovery of added spikes range from 97-101% for




Pt and Pd in blood at 0.012 ppm and 0.003  ppm levels, respectively.




                      Lead recovery of spiked blood  (0.2 ppm) range





from 96 to 106%, while the recovery range for urine  (0.002 ppm)  is





89 to 97%.  Recoveries of spiked lead in hair (10 ppm) and feces




(1 ppm) range from  95 to 103%.
                               82

-------
           TABLE 12.   PRECISION FOR Pb ANALYSIS
                  Pb Concentration
Sample       n   	ppm	

Blood        10       0. 178

Urine        12       0.01854

Hair         12      26.21

Feces         8       0.265
S. D. ppm

  0.012

  0.00292

  1.799

  0. 184
 C.V.
  %

 6. 74

15.75

 6.86

69.43
                              83

-------
       8.    Special Analysis




             a.   Paint Analysis for Pb Content





                  An exterior paint sample from the housing complex,





where a  majority of the children volunteers in the baseline study lived,





was analyzed for  Pb.




                  (1)  Analytical Procedure




                      A weighed amount (0. 673 grams) of the paint chips





was dissolved in 20 ml of methyl isobutyl ketone.  The  solvent was then




evaporated off using low heat and a flow of N-,.  The dried  residue was




digested with a  1: 1  mixture of cone. HNO^:H2SO4  on a hot plate (100°C).  The




sample was digested for 24 hours,  filtered through a glass-fiber





filter and the filtrate collected in a 100-ml volumetric flask.  Deionized




water was used to fill the flask to the mark. A 1: 50 dilution of this





solution  was made prior to aspirating the  sample into an air-acetylene flame.




                  (2)  Results




                      The Pb concentration was 2.4 mg/gram of dried




paint. The  solubility of the sample in MIBK and the low lead content




suggest a latex-type paint.




                      Ingestion of this type of  paint would not be suspected





in high blood-Pb levels  in children  living in the housing complex.
                                84

-------
             b.   Neutron Activation Analysis  (NAA)





                  (1)  Blood




                  The 0.2M TOA (in benzene) extracts from 128 blood





samples in the baseline study were composited to make one sample.




The 0. 02M TOA  (in xylene) extracts from 49 blood samples in the





mining study were composited to make another sample.  These two




samples were evaporated to dryness and reconstituted with a known





volume of benzene or xylene.




                      General Activation Analysis,  Inc. ,  San Diego,





California, did the neutron activation analysis  of these sample





composites.





                  (2)  Analytical Procedure




                      The samples plus comparator  standards were




irradiated  for 30 minutes in the  TRIGA Mark I Nuclear Reactor at a




flux of 1. 8 x 10   n/cm  /sec.  After a decay of 24 hours,  the samples




were wet-ashed under reflux in the presence of palladium and gold





carriers.  Palladium and gold were then precipitated from the resulting




solution, dissolved in aqua regia and counted on a Ge(Li) detector




coupled to  a multichannel gamma-ray  spectrometer.  Palladium





forms  Palladium-109 with a half-life of 13. 5 hours, while platinum




produces Gold-199 with a half-life fo 3. 15 days.
                               85

-------
                  (3)  Results




                      Accounting for the volume of the extracts used





for atomic absorption analysis and the volume of TOA recovered




from each extract,  the Pt and Pd concentration in blood is;





                         baseline:    4. 9 ppb Pt      < 0. 1  ppb Pd




                         mining:    < 2. 8 ppb Pt      < 0. 38 ppb Pd




The (< ) indicated that no analyte was detected, and the upper limits





are based on three  standard deviations from the counting statistics.




             c.   Dilution Tunnel Sweepings




                  A sample of material collected in the air dilution





tunnel of EPA's catalyst dynamometer testing facility was sent to





General Activation Analysis, Inc. , San Diego, California, for Pt





determination by NAA.





                  (1)  Analytical Procedure




                      The  sample was removed  from  its shipping container




and sealed in a tared polyethylene vial.   The weight of the sample was




1.0154 grams.  A platinum standard wets sealed in a  similar vial.




                      Both the sample and  standard were irradiated




simultaneously for  30 minutes  in a TRIGA Mark I  Nuclear Reactor





at a flux of  1. 8 x  10   n/cm  /sec.  After a twenty-hour decay, the





sample vial was opened and the sample placed in a 250 -milliliter





Erlenmeyer flask.  Ten milliliters of gold was added to the  sample,




and, using the  same pipet, 10 milliliters of gold were placed into a third




polyethylene vial.   This third vial was then heat-sealed.






                                86

-------
                      The sample was wet-ashed with nitric, hydrochloric

and sulfuric acids until clear.  Gold was precipitated using sulfur

dioxide.   The metal was -washed, dissolved in aqua regia, and the solution

placed into  a fourth polyethylene vial.  This fourth polyethylene vial

was then counted for 12 hours on a Ge(Li) detector coupled to a 4096

channel gamma-ray spectrometer.  The platinum standard was similarly

counted.  Platinum produces Gold-199 via the following reactions:


                         Pt-198   (n,v)   Pt-199

                         Pt-199    P >   Au-199

Only platinum produces this Gold-199 radioisotope.   Gold-199 was

detected in  the separated sample.  It was then quantitated by comparison

with the unopened platinum standard.

                      After  the above quantitation, the sealed vial plus

the vial containing the 10 ml of gold  was placed  back in the TRIGA MarkI

Nuclear Reactor.  After the second irradiation,  the two vials were counted

as above, and the amount of gold in the sample vial -was determined.

This procedure  determined the recovery factor  which,  in this case, was

83. 6%.  The platinum value  was corrected for this recovery value.

                 (2)  Results

                      Sample                    Ft  (ppm)

                      Dilution tunnel sweepings
                      CPL,  EPA, NERC,
                      RTP4/75                   2.44
                               87

-------
             d.  Vacutainer Contamination Study



                 (1)  Introduction

                                                   (23)
                      There has been some evidence     that so-called


"low-lead" blood collection tubes may actually be contaminated with



significant levels of lead.  This contamination may be introduced from


the manufacturing process,  or it  maybe incorporated into the glass



matrix of the tube itself.  The evidence from leaching experiments and

                          (23)
from microprobe analysis     indicates that it is  possible both these



sources of contamination are responsible for the lead contamination



present.


                      This investigation proposed to look at the lead



contamination by a leaching  procedure using whole blood, deionized water



and a dilute acid (0. IN HC1) as the leaching solutions.



                 (2)  Experimental



                      (a)  Selection  of Vacutainers


                          From  previous investigations of lead concentratio


in whole blood, the relative  standard deviation of the analytical method


was  known.  This allowed the determination of the number of vacutainers


that  would have to be analyzed to  have a preselected confidence interval



at the 95% level (see AppendixB). Setting the length of the confidence


interval at 0.008 (j.g/ml would require 40 vacutainers to be analyzed to



achieve this interval.
                                88

-------
                          A Hewlett-Packard Model 9810A calculator





was used to generate a list of random numbers (random number program).




Forty of these random numbers were used to select the vacutainers.





Each vacutainer in a case (1,000 vacutainers) was numbered in a





systematic fashion, and those vacutainers whose numbers corresponded





with the  random numbers were taken for analysis.





                      (b)  Analytical Procedure




                          Instrumental parameters are listed in Table 10.





                          Lead was selected as the analyte to represent




the heavy metal contamination.  The lead analysis was based upon the




natural level of lead found in whole  blood (BOOcc) purchased from  a





local blood bank.  The method of additions  and regression analysis was





used to determine the lead concentration in the blood (Figure 7).





                          Since the program requires data on platinum





and palladium concentrations in blood, it was decided that these two





metals would also be included in this investigation.




                          Levels of platinum and palladium in normal




(unexposed) human blood have not been determined, but they are so low




that to get valid data  on these metals from  this study it would  be





necessary to spike the blood (1 ng/ml).  Any platinum  or  palladium




contamination from the vacutainers  could then be determined by the




increased absorption signal.  From the design of this investigation,





any loss  of these  metals to the vacutainer surfaces could  also be
                               89

-------
   10(1
   •ILL
   i'U
1
•a
• H
0)
rt  i )
0)  4
   10
           8.47 pg/ldOT ml

           ±  0.62 v«g/100 ml

           C.  V.  = 7.3%
                        in
00 in]     10
                                                      -'O
   FIGURE 7.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF BLOOD-Pb SPIKES
                                   90

-------
determined, provided it was great enough to be above the detection



limit of the atomic absorption instrument.


                           (i)  Lead Analysis



                               The procedure used for lead analysis of

                                                           (18)
whole blood is based upon that of Mi-tchell,  Ryan and Aldous.      One



milliliter of whole blood  is treated with 1.0 ml of a hemolyzing-chelating


solution consisting of a non-ionic  surfactant (Triton X-100, 5% by


volume) and sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (2% by weight).  The sample


is vigorously  shaken  and then allowed  to stand for  10 to 15 minutes to



insure complete hemolysis.  One  milliliter of methyl isobutyl ketone



(MIBK) is added, and the sample is thoroughly mixed and then centrifuged


at 3,000 RPM for  5 minutes.  The organic layer is removed for lead



analysis.



                               Lead analysis of the water samples


followed the same procedure used for blood, but the dilute acid  samples


were neutralized (pH 7) with 0. IN NaOH prior to extraction.


                          (ii)  Platinum and Palladium Analysis


                               The extraction of platinum and palladium


from whole blood is based upon the methods of Khattak and Magee.


Five milliliters of whole  blood  is digested in a Vycor beaker with HNO3



(70: 30) on a. hot plate at 200  C.  A flow of N?  is used to evaporate  the digest


solution to approximately 1 or 2 ml.  The  remaining digest is reconstituted



and evaporated to near dryness twice with concentrated HC1.  It  is finally
                                 91

-------
reconstituted with 5 ml of 0. 1M HC1 and quantitatively transferred to a




10-ml volumetric flask.  Deionized water is used to fill the flask to





the mark.  The diluted solution is then placed in an extraction vessel,





1 ml of 25% SnCl2 solution (in 3 N HC1) is added, and the solution is





shaken for 30  seconds.  Then 0. 5 ml (BOOfol) of a 0.2M tri-n-octylamine




solution (in benzene) is added to the extraction vessel and shaken for





1 minute.  The organic phase is removed from the vessel and analyzed




for platinum and  palladium.




                 (3)  Discussion





                      Whole blood and deionized water were added to the





vacutainers by the route commonly used, i. e. with a needle using the





vacuum in the tube.   The acid leach solution was added by removing the




rubber  stopper.  This prevented the acid solution from being contaminated





by the metal needle.  Twenty-five of the vacutainers were used for whole




blood and the remainder for the deionized water and dilute acid leaches.




                     All the vacutainerg; were filled at the same time.




Then, at 1-, 3-,  6-, 24- and 30-hour intervals, the blood tubes were




analyzed for lead.  Vacutainers with deionized water were analyzed for




lead at  6-, 24- and 30-hour intervals,  and  those with dilute acid were





analyzed at 6 and 30 hours.  Only one analysis was made for  platinum





and .palladium, and that was at 40 hours.





                     All the vacutainers were maintained at room temperatur




throughout the  study.
                               92

-------
                      At each of the specified time intervals, blood





lead analysis was performed on 5  of the blood-containing vacutainers




and on 3 control blood aliquots (i. e. blood not exposed to a vacutainer).




This gave a direct comparison of the blood-lead levels in the vacutainers,





at the specified contact times,  with the control bloods, thereby preventing





any instrument-parameter variation from affecting the analytical results.




                      Each vacutainer was sampled for lead only once





during the  course of this study.





                      Three deionized water  and three dilute acid-containing





vacutainers were  analyzed at the specified time intervals along with 2




controls (i. e. leaching solution not in a vacutainer) for each.




                  (4)  Calculations




                      (a)  Regression Analysis





                          Control blood spiked at  four different levels




was analyzed in duplicate  by the extraction method given for lead analysis.





Regression analysis was performed on a Hewlett-Packard Model 9810A




calculator  on the absorption peak heights vs the lead concentrations.




The results were  that the  blood used for this  study contained a lead level




of 8.47 ng/100 ml + 0. 62  |j.g/100 ml with a coefficient of variation of




7. 3% (see Figure  7).




                      (b)  Statistical Analysis





                          The data were examined by two different methods





(see Table 13).  First, the results were  calculated on the basis of the
                                93

-------
               TABLE 13.   VACUTAINER STUDY DATA
Time
Hours

1


3


6


24


30


dif.,mm
t
\s^
a<.
df
iif.,mm
t
i^

<£*.
df
3if,,mm
t
\s^
ex.
df
dif0mm
t
v^—
G<
df
BLOOD
Indiv
13
1.46
0.64
_..
10
Mean

mple)


•nple )




1.61
0.52
-_.(c>
3
2.11
0.90
___(c)
j
ACID
Indiv

( no s


( no s

4.80
3.%
<0.01
10

( no sa

-4.67
-0.76
_->>
8
Mean

imple )


umple )





mple)




(a) calculations based on number of individual injections of sample aliquot into graphite fun-Bee
(b) calculations based on mean value  of each sample analyzed.
(c)   ~^£E-  very large
                                      94

-------
 individual sample aliquot injected into the furnace (individual data points).



 Secondly,  the results were calculated on the basis of the mean value of



 the data points for each sample (mean of data points).



                          The test to show whether or not there is  lead



 contamination from the vacutainers  is a test for the difference between



 means of independent groups using Student's t distribution.   The control



 bloods (or deionized water or dilute acid leach  solutions controls) are



 labeled group 1, and those from the vacutainers are labeled group 2.



                          We test the hypothesis:
                             Ho :
                                          vs Ha :
or whether the mean lead level of the blood in the vacutainers
is  greater than that in the control blood
                                              If we let
                              X:    =  the mean of group i
                             N.
                                            ,, ., ;  .th      ,
                                   =  size of the  i   sample



                                   =  variance of the i  sample




                                   =  1,2
the test statistic, tc>  is defined as
\l
(NJ - i)
NI
Sj2 +
+ N2
(N2 - DS22
- 2
i 1
_N! N2 _

with (N^ -f N-, - 2) degrees of freedom (df).
                                95

-------
                          The significance level, oC , is the probability




of obtaining by chance a value as large as tc from a Student's t distribution




with (N< + N7 - 2) degrees of freedom, when the null hypothesis, H ,
       i    ^                                                     o


is true.  Symbolically,




                      P [t(Ni + N2 - 2)  >  tc]   =  S.



                            /~s
                          If oc is less than the chosen significance




level (0.05,  0.10,  0.01),  then we reject H  in favor of H .  If it is
                                         O             cl



greater, we  accept HQ as  no change in the  lead levels.




                 (5)  Results




                      (a)  Lead




                          (i)   Blood




                               At the 0.05  level, there  is no significant




difference between the control blood and the vacutainer  blood after 1 hour




contact time for both the individual peak and mean peak calculations




(see Tables  13 and 14).  After 6 hours Ln the vacutainer,  the individual




peak calculations showed a significant difference between the control




blood and the vacutainer blood, but the mean peak calculations for  this




time interval indicated no significant difference.  Since each vacutainer




may contain  varying amounts of lead but still remain below the limits




specified by  the manufacturer, and also  since  the instrument response




may not be exactly the same for each  individual injection (pipet




error,  slight variation in  graphite tube,  etc.),  the mean peak calculations
                                96

-------
  TABLE 14.  RESULTS OF VACUTAINER STUDY -- COMPARISON
           OF CONTROLS AND VACUTAINER BLOOD LEAD
Time
Control Blood
   fxg/100 ml
Vacutainer Blood
     IJig/100 ml
 Significant
Difference at
the 0.05 Level
lours
1
3
6
24
30
Mean
8.47
8.47
8.47
8.47
8.47
Std. Dev.
0.28
0. 41
1. 43
0.66
1.20
Mean
9.65
10.25
9.76
9.51
9.75
Std. Dev.
1.01
0.85
1.58
1.22
0. 73
(Table 13)
no
yes
9
?
yes
                               97

-------
may be a more meaningful indication of the actual lead contamination





present. At the 24-hour interval, based upon the mean peak calculations,





the difference between control blood and vacutainer blood may or may





not be significant.  The  difference is significant after 30 hours contact




time between the blood and the vacutainers.




                          (ii) Water and Acid





                              Both the deionized water and dilute acid





leaches showed a  significant difference between the control leach solution




and that in the vacutainers after 6 hours (see Table 13).  At the 24- and





30-hour intervals, there were no, significant differences between the




controls and the vacutainers for each the dionized water or dilute acid





leaches.




                      (b)  Platinum and Palladium





                          There was no indication of contamination of the





vacutainers with these metals.   After 40 hours, there was a  significant




difference between the spiked controls and the vacutainers spiked blood




levels (see Table  15), but this difference indicated a  "loss"  of the




platinum and palladium  spike to the container.




                  (6)  Conclusion





                      (a)  Lead




                          The lead contamination found in this particular





case of B-D vacutainer  10-ml tubes is approximately 0. 13 |ag per tube




(see Table 14).  This  is within the 0. 1 |j.g per tube level specified by




the manufacturer's certification.






                                98

-------
TABLE  15.   VACUTAINER STUDY Pt and Pd RESULTS








Mean
Std. Dev.
t (0.05)
df
Significant
% diff (means)
Platinum
Control
mjT)
13
8
8
11
5
11
3. 1
Vacutainer
jnm
12
7
8
5
11
8.6
2. 9
2. 53
8
yes
2.2.
Palladium
Control
mm
62
54
67
69

63
6. 7
Vacutainer
mm
56
56
53


55
1. 7
3. 39
5
yes
13
                         99

-------
                          The fact that the lead level remains relatively




constant with regard to exposure time would indicate that it is not tightly




bound to the  glass matrix of the vacutainer. Also, the lead contamination




does appear  to be uniformly constant throughout a given lot of vacutainers




but within the stated limit.




                      (b)  Platinum and Palladium




                          There was no evidence that the vacutainers




contained detectable amounts of either  platinum or palladium. The data




do indicate that after exposing spiked blood to the vacutainers for 40




hours there  is a  22% "loss" of the platinum spike and 13% "loss" of the




palladium spike.




                      (c)  Contamination




                          There should be no problem with contamination




when using these vacutainers for peidemiological investigations.  The




only precuation that should be followed is to remove the blood from the




vacutainer and place it in a linear  polyethylene container  (acid washed)




within a few  hours after it has been drawn.  This would prevent "loss"




of the analyte metals to the walls of the vacutainers.





             e.   Lead-210 Study




                  (1)  Selection of Subcontractor




                      Five firms were contacted to see if they were



                        210
interested in performing    Pb analysis on a limited number  of biological




and environmental samples.  Two  of the companies were not  set up to


         210
perform     Pb determinations on a routine basis and were not interested
                                100

-------
in doing the limited number of samples.  Another company was



interested but did not have the necessary standards available.  A



fourth company said they could find no reasonable method to determine


210
   Pb utilizing either fast or thermal neutron activation analysis.  The



LFE Environmental Analysis Laboratories, Richmond, California, was



interested and sent a price quote for    Pb analysis .  This company was



selected to perform the analysis.



                  (2)  Method of Analysis



                      (a)  Sample Preparation



                          (i)   Blood and feces samples from the base-



line survey were removed from the freezer and packed in a styrofoam



mailing carton with enough dry ice to last 72 hours.  The blood samples



were sealed in a polyethylene bag to protect them from the feces samples.



A total of 30 blood samples (in 30-ml polyethylene bottles) and 30 feces



samples (in 60-oz polyethylene jars) were shipped by air express for



21°™.     ,  -
   Pb  analysis.



                               Three glass-fiber air filters used to



collect particulate matter  in the baseline survey were sealed in individual



polyethylene bags.  The bags  were then sealed in an  insulated envelope



for air shipment with the other environmental samples.



                               Eight soil samples (16-oz polyethylene



jars) were packed in an insulated mailing  carton with enough dry ice  to


                                                         210
last 72 hours.  This carton was shipped by air express far    Pb analysis.
                               101

-------
                          (ii)   The soil and feces samples were dried



at 110°C to constant weight and the dry weight of the  sample recorded.



The samples were then ashed at 450°C to remove any carbonaceous



and/or organic materials.



                     (b)  Sample Dissolution



                          The air filters and ashed feces and soil



samples were dissolved with successive HNO-j-HF treatments to achieve



complete dissoltuion.  The dissolved sample was  equilibrated with



standardized Pb carrier.  The total blood sample  was wet ashed with



HNOo in the presence of standardized Pb carrier.



                     (c)  Decontamination



                          The equilibrated samples were purified radio-



chemically by precipitating a lead carbonate, lead iodide, and a lead



nitrate.  For the soil samples with high concentrations of Fe, the Fe was


                                                210
removed with a Hexone extraction.  The purified     Pb was mounted as



lead sulfate,  and the radiochemical yield was determined by weighing the



lead sulfate and by correcting for the macro Pb in the sample. The time



of the lead sulfate precipitation is recorded as the final separation time


 , 210   210
of    Pb-    Bi.



                     (d)  Counting



                          The lead  sulfate contained in a Mylar sandwich



on a plastic planchet is counted on a CE-14 low background beta counter



as soon as possible after the    Pb-   Bi separation time.  The sample


                                                              210
is counted five times within a period of two weeks to  observe the    Bi



ingrowth.

                               102

-------
                      (e)  Calculations


                                                  210
                          The standard method for    Pb analysis at

                                         Z10
LFE involves a separation of the daughter    Bi and multiple beta counts


                    210
of the  sample as the    Bi grows back into equilibrium.   The counting is



done on a CE-14 low background beta counter.  Sixteen of these counters



are on-line at LFE with backgrounds of 0.4 to 0.5 cpm.  The sample is



counted through a thin aluminum absorber (4.75 mg Al/cm  ) to screen



out any    Po alpha particles.  The    Pb  beta particles (0.061 MeV



maximum) do not register on the counters.  All counts are assumed due to


7 \ n
   Bi  (1.160 MeV maximum).



                          Punched data cards are produced for each



measurement on the sample by the computer.  All sample information is



available  in disk files, and on a routine basis,  no  keypunching is required.



                          The calculation is done  by computer. A



weighted linear least squares analysis is performed on the growth data


                        210
resolving an equilibrium     Bi value and an assumed long-lived component.



All data points are corrected for growth during counting and are weighted



as the  inverse variance of the net cpm as derived from counting statistics.



After an initial fit, points  that are more than 2 6 (counting statistics)



away from the fitted value are rejected and a second fit is done.  Errors



are computed by  propagating errors due to counting statistics through the



least squares formula. If the data points do not fit the determined line as



well as would be  expected  from the counting  statistics, a larger error,



based on the  goodness  of fit, is used.
                                103

-------
                 (3)   Limit of Detection in Blood and Feces




                      (a)  Blood - On a 10ml blood sample, the limit
                Z10
of detection for    Pb is 0.045p Ci/total sample.
                      (b)  Feces




                          A 10-g (dry wt.) sample has a detection
limit of 0.05 1 Ci/gram for 21°Pb.
       9.    Discussion and Conclusions




             a.  Platinum and Palladium




                 An extraction system designed to handle a large




number of samples on a routine basis must keep procedural  steps to a



minimum.



                 The  HMWA extraction system described here is a




relatively simple means to extend the limit of detection of the atomic



absorption analysis  of Pt and Pd.




                 Further improvements in this HMWA extraction



system could improve the abosolute amount of Pt and Pd which may be



determined.   The excessive  amount of "smoke" during the  atomization



of the extract limits the volume of TOA.  which may be injected into the



graphite furnace.  Decreasing the concentration of TOA has been only



partially successful in eliminating this problem.  Increasing the ashing




temperature  has not helped either.  There are losses of analyte at the



temperature  needed to remove the excess matrix.



                 This excessive "smoke" during atomization necessitates



that the hollow cathode lamp  and the deuterium arc lamp (background
                               104

-------
corrector) be alined very carefully,  or incorrect absorption readings




will result.  Pd is affected more by incorrect alinement than is Pt.




                  Composite samples were another means of increasing




the limit of detection for Pt and Pd.   Experience in this laboratory has




shown that wet ashing large quantities of solid material requires an




excessive amount of time.  Digestion of spiked composite hair and feces




samples gave very erratic  results.  Recoveries were in the range




30-70% for Pt and Pd in feces and  hair.




                 Spiked urine composite recoveries for Pd ranged from




0-60%,  and for Pt the range was 0-100%.  More work needs to be invested




in this area to make it a reliable method for increasing the sensitivity




of Pt and Pd determinations.




                  The limits of detection given in Table 5 for urine,




hair and feces are calculated on the basis of complete  ( > 90%)  recovery




using the extraction procedure outlined.  The  limit of detection for blood




is calculated on the basis that the absolute limit of  detection for our




instrument is Pt = l.OTng and Pd = 0.33ng.




                 Analysis  of particulate matter collected on glass-fiber




filters for Pt and Pd is limited by  the total amount  of material on the




filter.  Samples collected in the mining study  contained such large




amounts of particulate matter that large volumes of acid were  needed to




solubilize all the analytes present.  Removal of this acid required  an




excessive amount of time .




                 Extracts  of the air samples  collected in the mining study




contained an interference which prevented their analysis.  This interference




was thought to be very fine  particulate matter  which was not digested







                               105

-------
or removed by filtering and was subsequently trapped in the TOA




extract. Background correction could not compensate for this interference,




                 Another set of air samples collected at the mining study




site contained less particulate matter.  Analysis of these filters by the




method described was possible.




                 The  extraction of Pt and Pd in a single extract using




a liquid anion exhcnager (tri-n-octylamine) from an approximately 3N HC1




solution provides a means of concentra.ting these elements so they




will be within the detection limit of AAS using the flameless graphite




furnace.  The procedure  improves the limit of detection for Pt and Pd




in biological samples and also provides a means of improving the




sensitivity of AAS analysis for Pt and Pd.







             b.  Lead




                 The  extraction procedure for blood Pb provides a




simple and fast means of analyzing a large number of samples.  Table 12





shows that the method has good precision.





                 Table 11 gives the quantity of  spike solution added to




1 ml of blood to determine the analytical regression curve (Figure 7}




used to calculate the unknown blood samples.  Attempts at spiking a





large quantity of blood at different levels of Pb concentration and then




using an aliquot for analysis have produced erratic results in our




laboratory.  The spike is added directly to the sample prior to extraction.
                               106

-------
                 The limit of detection for Pb in blood is restricted




more by the reagent blank signal than by the background noise level of




the instrument.  Attempts to  remove Pb from the reagents has been




only partly successful.




                 Extraction of urine Pb by this procedure gives a rather




high C.V. (Table 12).  One reason for this is  the low concentration of




Pb normally found in urine.   Another  reason may be that the 1% acetic





acid used in this laboratory to preserve the urine samples is not




sufficient to maintain all the urine components in solution.





                 Like blood, the limit of detection of Pb in urine is a




function of the  reagent blank's Pb concentration. High reagent blank




absorption increases the limit of detection.  Urine  samples are spiked





similarly to the method  given for blood (Table  11) and for the same




reason.




                 Hair analysis for Pb by the air-acetylene flame provides




good precision (Table 12).  The most  common  reason for coefficients




of variation greater than 7% is improperly washed hair.




                 The limit of detection for Pb in hair by the flame




method is limited by the instrument noise level rather than reagent blank




interference.   Spikes are added to the hair samples right after the




digestion acid has been added.





                 Feces analysis for Pb varies (Table 12) because it




is difficult to obtain a completely homogeneous sample.  Even  though the
                                107

-------
samples are homogenized prior to analysis, the relatively small sample





analyzed (1.5 grams) makes it difficult to imrpove upon the analytical




variation.





                 Digestion of the feces in the Teflon bombs is a fast




and easy method to analyze for Pb. The  limit of detection is restricted




by the Pb concentration in the reagent blank and the  size of sample




which may be used. Use of suprapure acids has decreased the reagent




blank absorption but has not completely eliminated it.





                 Determination of Pb in  fecal samples by "closed"




digestion is considerably faster than "open" digestion methods, but




precision suffers because of the  nonhomogenity of the sample.







                 The procedures for Pb  analysis in blood, urine,




and hair provide fast and reliable methods of determining Pb in these




commonly used epidemiological monitors of environmental health.







                 Leaching of air  filters and soil samples with acids




is a better method to determine Pb in these  sample matrices rather




than lengthy "total"  digestion procedures commonly used.  Care must




be taken to verify that all the analyte is being removed using the leach




procedure.
                                108

-------
E.     Data Processing







       Two types of data forms were processed on this project.  A




questionnaire form providing personal information pertinent to this





study was completed by each person volunteering as a human subject





participant for the human subject sampling.  A metal analysis form




for coding chemical analysis results was completed for each sample




analyzed in the laboratory.







       The questionnaire was filled out by prospective study partici-




pants. The Los Angeles, Lancaster, and Ontario participants




completed the Platinum, Palladium and Lead Questionnaire,




OMB-158-S-74010, while the New Jersey participants completed a





brief Information  Form.  Upon their receipt, the questionnaires  for a




study site were coded,  assigned an ID number, keypunched,  and




listed in name, sex, and age sequences for selection of the most




appropriate participants.  The Principal Investigator and the




Project Officer selected the study participants to meet the planned




age and sex distributions at  each baseline site.
                               109

-------
       To insure accurate reporting, transmission,  and interpretation

of the analytical determinations on each collected sample, a fifteen-

character label code was devised for this project and similar epidemiologica

studies.   The code consisted of four characters  identifying the project,

two characters identifying the site, three characters for the sampling

period and subperiod or sample number, one character specifying the

sample medium,  and one character for the analysis to  be performed, and

four characters giving the ID number for a human subject or the location

identification for  an environmental sample.  Documentation of the label

code is shown in Appendix D.

       A label generation computer program was developed to print

up the  required number and types  of sa.mple  labels for  each container

into which the human subject and environmental samples were to be

placed during sample collection and processing.  The fifteen-character

label code, the sample medium (blood,  feces, air, water, etc.),

and the sampling  period or sample number were printed on each sample

label.  On the human subject sample la.bels,  the  participant's name

was printed on the labels to be used for  sample collection, but it was

deleted from the processing sample labels.  Two samples of the sample

labels  are shown  below.


                                           URINE
               2222UMLA1133881        FIRST  SAMPLE
                                            BLOOD
                 a2?8BMLA1233881       SECOND SAMPLE


                               110

-------
        When the study participants at a site had been selected, their




keypunched questionnaire cards and instructions regarding the type





and number of labels were input into the label generation computer




program.  All of the sample labels needed for collection and processing




of the  site's samples were printed by the program in a sequence





that would facilitate their use.




        Later,  when the chemical analysis of a set of samples from a




site was completed, the results were reported for data processing and




statistical evaluation on the Metal Analysis Coding Form.  This form





was specifically designed for transmitting the chemical determinations





obtained on this project and related epidemiological studies.   For each





sample analyzed,  the fifteen-character  sample label code,  the sample




medium,  and each of the analytical determinations (metal,  concentration,





and units) were recorded on the Metal Analysis Coding Form. A reduced




copy of the form is presented in Appendix D.  The information on each




set of  Metal Analysis Coding Forms was checked  and then keypunched.




       After all the human subject sample determinations were




received and keypunched, the questionnaire data cards and the metal




analysis determination cards for each type of sample were merged into




a single file that was sorted by ID number and card type.  A computer




program was written to abstract the necessary questionnaire and sample




determination information from the file in a form  suitable for statistical




analysis.
                                Ill

-------
        The data processing of the environmental samples was done





manually.   This was because there were few air,  soil, and water




samples with positive chemical determination, and because various




sampling configurations were used.





F.      Statistical Methods




        1.    Baseline
             a.  Environment




                 The statistical methodology was to characterize  and




compare the environments of the Los Angeles and Lancaster human





subject participants.  Because there were no detectable levels of platinum




or palladium in any of the individual baseline environmental samples, only




the detected lead concentrations were statistically analyzed.




                 Two air samples were obtained at the Los Angeles




participants' residence, the U. C.L.A.  married student apartment,




for lead analysis.  Thirteen air samples were obtained from the backyards




of some of the  Lancaster participants.  The lead concentration determinatior




of these Los Angeles and Lancaster air samples were compared.  The




standard t test of two independent samples was used to detect any significant




difference in the mean air lead concentration.  The t  test assumes both





sampled populations are normally distributed with equal variances.  The




equality of variance assumption for the  two independent comparable





groups was  tested by the  standard F-test.  The validity of these  assumptions




was examined for each set of tissue data without transformation, under
                                112

-------
logarithmic transformation, and under  square root transformation.




The square root transformation yielded acceptable variance equality




between the two air quality populations, whereas the logarithmic




and untransformed data did not. Hence, a two-sided t test was applied




to the  square  root transformed lead determinations  for each air sample.




                 The soil lead analysis focused on characterizing




the relationship between the surface soil lead concentration and the




distance upwind or downwind from the freeway in Los Angeles.




Graphical techniques were used to present the soil lead results from two




Los Angeles locations adjacent to the San Diego Freeway as a function of




the upwind and downwind distance.  The configuration of the Los Angeles




soil sampling  permitted only one soil lead sample to be taken at the




Los Angeles participant's residence.  Seven soil samples were obtained




from the backyards of Lancaster participants and analyzed for their



                                    (24)
lead concentration.  Dixon's gap test     for outliers was used to




determine whether the Los Angeles residence soil sample could be




considered a member of the Lancaster soil population. Inspection




indicated that  the logarithmically transformed Lancaster soil data




appeared more normally distributed data than either the untransformed or




square root transformed data.   In addition, use of logarithmically




transformed data would  yield the most conservative  Dixon test (i. e. ,




considering the Los Angeles sample as  an outlier only when it certainly




must be an outlier).  For these reasons, the Dixon gap test was applied




to the logarithmically transformed soil  lead data.
                                113

-------
                 Five  samples of tap water were obtained from the





homes of Los Angeles and Lancaster participants and analyzed for their





lead concentrations.  The two-sample t test was used to test the null




hypothesis of no difference in the mean lead concentration of the Los Angeles




and Lancaster water supplies.  Since square root transformed data yielded





acceptable equality of variance,  the two-sided t test was conducted on





the square root transformed data.





             b.   Human Subjects




                 The statistical analysis methodology was to compare the




mean platinum,  palladium, and lead concentrations in the blood, long




and short hair, urine,  and feces samples from corresponding groups





of 137 participants from the Los Angeles site and 125 participants from





the Lancaster area.  Because  none of the participant samples had





detectable platinum or  palladium concentrations,  the statistical analysis




was restricted to the lead concentration data.  The two blood,  urine,




and feces samples obtained during the  week from  each participant  were




considered replicates;  their mean was utilized as the observed  participant




value.  When a reported lead concentration was below the analytical




method's detection limit, the detection limit was substituted as the




concentration in the statistical analysis.





                 Three Lancaster participants had extremely high




outlier hair lead values.  A retired man had  a lead concentration of 4,700 (j.g,





in his long hair sample.  An elderly lady's hair samples showed lead levels





of 3,800 (JLg/g in the long hair and 760i  (j.g/g in the short  hair.  A preschool
                                 114

-------
girl who lived with the elderly lady had hair lead levels of 130 ^g/g in



her long hair and  940 |j,g/g in her short hair.  Since the three were


neighbors in an isolated area who all spent the entire day at home  and


who all had normal blood and urine lead levels, a non-vehicular lead



source was hypothesized.  Thus, the hair lead data on these three



participants was excluded from the statistical analysis.



                  The standard t test of two independent samples


was utilized to compare corresponding participant groups from the


two sites with respect to significant differences in population means.



Site comparisons  were conducted for each tissue on the total participant



groups and on subgroups stratified by sex and age.  The t test assumes


both sampled populations are normally distributed with equal variances.



The normality assumption was examined by testing the  skewness' of the


                    (25)
group observations.      The equality of variance assumption for the



two independent comparable  groups was tested by the standard F-test.


The validity of these assumptions was examined for each set of tissue data


without transformation,  under logarithmic transformation,  and under


square root transformation for the total group and the male and female


subgroup comparisons across site. In every case,  the logarithmic


transformation yielded the more valid t tests.  Thus, logarithmically


transformed lead  concentration data was utilized.  Each t statistic



tested the null hypothesis of  equal  population or stratum means across



site against the  two-sided alternative of unequal means.
                                115

-------
                  The lead concentrations of the blood, hair, urine,





and feces samples from the  participants at the two sites were also




related to  various potentially pertinent factors in addition to sex and age.




These additional factors were preschool-nursery vs children in school,





length of residence in the  city,  distance from the expressway, distance




from other highways, types  of air conditioning, level of cigarette smoking,




ethnic grouping, and occupation.   Because these additional factors were





not considered in the participant selection process, most of these factors




were highly correlated with  the site.  For example, 85% of the Los Angeles




participants had no air conditioning, while 55% of the Lancaster participants




had central air  conditioning  and another 18% had window units.   Because




of the design interactions  of these additional factors with the site, each





factor was analyzed both as  a main effect and within site in relation  to





the lead concentration data for  each tissue.   The effects of each factor





were inspected  using both  the original and logarithmically transformed




data.  All the detected main effects proved to be spurious; actual




site and/or age  effects, masquerading through the design interaction as




the effect of an  additional  factor,  were  responsible for the apparent




factor effect.  Only when an additional factor showed a consistent





relationship to the lead determinations for two or  more tissues at the





same site was the apparent factor effect subjected to a formal t test




of significance.   When the factor had  more than two levels, the nature of




the relationship of the factor to the lead mean determined the definition




of the two groups submitted  to the t test.  When the factor possessed
                                116

-------
level ordering and the lead mean varied according to this ordering,





the lowest and highest levels of the factor were taken as the compared




groups.  Otherwise,  all the levels of the factor were compressed into




the two best comparison groups.  The  null hypothesis of equal lead





concentration means  was compared against the alternative of an elevated





mean for the logically affected group using a one-sided t test.  The data




were logarithmically transformed prior to each t test to better satisfy





the equality of variance assumption.




                  Two blood, urine, and feces  samples were obtained on





consecutive days from most of the Los Angeles and Lancaster participants.




For all the lead determinations made on a given tissue  from a given





site-sex-age group, the between participant variation was compared





against the within participant variation.  The between participant variance





measures the  amount of lead determination variability from one participant




to another  in the given tissue and site-sex-age  group.   The within





participant variance measures the lead determination variability between




the two samples from each participant in the group.  The null hypothesis




that the between participant variance equals the within participant variance




was tested against the alternative that it exceeds the within participant




variance using a variance  ratio F test.




                 In many  cases,  the F test accepted the null hypothesis.




The implication in such cases is that the two samples obtained on





consecutive days from a single person have as  much lead variability
                                117

-------
as two samples taken from different people in the same site-sex-age





group.  To further examine this sampling variability and to determine





whether the analytical method was the responsible factor, an




additional blood sampling experiment was performed.  Sixteen blood





samples were taken from an adult male at the same time.  Each sample





was  separated  into two aliquots.  Each aliquot was  processed, frozen,




and analyzed for lead using the  same procedures employed with the





Lancaster and  Los Angeles participant blood samples.  An analysis of




variance was conducted using the logarithmically transformed lead




determinations to examine  the variation between samples and between





aliquots within a sample.  The interaction term was used to estimate





the precision variance  of the combined processing/analytical  procedure.





The  variance components estimated from this sampling experiment





were compared against the participant and sampling variability obtained




with the comparable group  of Lancaster and Los Angeles participants




(males aged 17-34) to  evaluate the sources of variation.




       2.    Refineries




             a.  Environment




                 The  environment of New Jersey refinery workers was





examined through 24-hour ambient air samples obtained for five




consecutive work days  in both the refinery and  salts sections  of





the refinery.  The platinum and palladium concentrations  of each sample




were determined.  The statistical methodology was to characterize the
                                118

-------
distribution of platinum and palladium in the air in the refinery


and salts sections.  Characterization consisted of tabulating the


concentration determinations by work  section and calculating the mean


and standard deviation of each set of data.


                 A relatively high palladium determination was obtained


on the Monday air  sample in the refinery section.  Since even with dilution


this sample was above the linear calibration range for palladium, its

                                   3
value was estimated as 0. 356 ug/m  .  It is uncertain whether this  sample


represents a valid  palladium concentration resulting from an operational


malfunction in the  refinery section or whether the sample was  contaminated.


For this reason, the palladium characterization of the refinery section


air was presented both including and excluding the Monday sample.  It


should be noted that the workers urine specimens were collected Monday


night  and Tuesday morning and that the blood samples were taken on Tuesday.


Hence,  if there was a very high palladium air concentration in the  refinery


section on Monday, it could have  had an effect on the  palladium results


from  the New Jersey participants.


             b.  Study Participants


                  Single samples  of blood and urine were   obtained from


 each of 61 refinery worker participants.  The platinum and palladium


 concentrations of  every blood sample  were below the analytical method's


 detection  limits.  However, of the 58 urine samples obtained and analyzed,


 6 had platinum concentrations above the platinum detection limit of
                                119

-------
1.4 |ag/l, and 34 had palladium concentrations above the 0.4 (Jig/I





detection limit for palladium.  Because the  detectable platinum




determinations were few and isolated, the sample results were simply




reported without any statistical analysis.




                  The palladium determinations from the New Jersey




workers were subjected to an appropriate statistical analysis.   Each




palladium determination below the analytical detection limit was set





to the limit for the statistical analysis.  The original data  and  their




logarithmic transformations  were examined.  The logarithmic transformatic




yielded the more normally distributed data;  it was used for the  subsequent

                                                  J



analyses.  The mean and standard deviation were used to characterize




the palladium distribution, both for all the workers and for the workers




in each of the five work sections.  A  one-way analysis of variance by




•work section was conducted to test whether the mean  urine  palladium




level was the  same for the workers in each work  section.




                  Correlation analysis was used in attempting to relate




the ln(Pd) urine determinations to each of six potentially relevant




factors:  age, race,  cigarette smoking,  length of employment, work




section, and work shift.  The work sections were ordered from highest





to lowest anticipated palladium exposure:  refinery (1),  salts (2),




recovery (3),  maintenance (4), and storeroom (5).  For  each factor,




the null hypothesis of zero correlation was tested against the two-sided





                               I	/I	T
alternative using the statistic ryn-2/y (1-r ) which has  the t distribution
                                120

-------
with n-2 degrees, where n is the number of pairs on which the


correlation coefficient r was computed.  R. A.  Fisher demonstrated


that for this test of zero correlation,  it is  sufficient  that only one  of

                                    (26)
the variates be normally distributed.     The correlation analysis was


conducted for two situations:  using all 58  palladium, determinations


with negative results valued  at the detection limit,  and using only


the 34 palladium determinations exceeding  the detection limit.
                                121

-------
                           V.  RESULTS


A.     Baseline


       1.    Platinum and Palladium
             Data for platinum and palladium in study participants of

Los Angeles and Lancaster are shown in Table 16.  No detectable levels

were  found in individual samples; thus,  "less than" values (detection

limits)  are  shown.  In an effort to obtain some idea of the actual levels

present in blood, a composite of blood from all age groups and both

sexes of Los Angeles and from Lancaster was analyzed for platinum

and palladium.  Measureable levels were found for platinum as seen at

the bottom of Table 16.

             Autopsy samples were collected in Los Angeles from a

pathologist at a teaching hospital.  Table 17 shows the information

obtained for these autopsy cases. For each autopsy,  samples of liver,

kidney,  spleen, lung, muscle and fat v/ere collected.  No detectable levels

of these two metals were found in these  tissues.  Table 18  shows the

"less than" values for each of these tissues.

             Platinum and palladium v/ere also measured in ambient air,

soil and tap water samples  collected in Los  Angeles and Lancaster.  No

detectable levels were found at the following detection limits:

                            Platinum         Palladium
       Ambient air         <5 x 10~8Hg/m3   < 6 x 10'8|JLg/m3
       Tap water           < 0. 08 ppb         < 0.0 24 ppb
       Soil                 < 0 . 8 ppb          < 0 .7 ppb
                               122

-------
i
J
<
U
2:
0$
H
E
H
D
O
CO
J
H
>
W
J

5
D
I-H
Q
<
J
J

2
<

2


r—I
H

<
J
W
J
PQ
<
H










!H
0)


CO
n)
O
C
n)
J

T!
c
rt
CO
0)
~H

•M
»-^
bo
H
Zl.
1
0)
c
• H
>H
D
_-{
y
CU
f-O
•
O
V





4->
OH

vO

CD
V
^H
S
o
o
d
bo
T)
0
0
S

r?
OH

O
O
V




•4->
OH
a
0
f.
M
O
<1J
be

r-H
•
ro
V


r— 1


r-H
O
O
•
o
V


rvj
0
O
O
V
tM
O
•
O
V


LO
O
•
o
V


ro
•
O
V




vO

CD'
V

o
o
V



i— H
^>


HH
r-H


r-H
o
o
o
V


fS]
O
O
CD
V
rg
O
.
o
V


in
o
•
o
V


CO
•
o
V




vO

o
V

o
o
V



i-H
•
m
V


i — i
i— i
I-H

«— 1
E

O
0
r— 1
•n*^
bo
0)
_~i
0<
S
n)
CO
-§
O
3

•|H
CO
O
0,
g
o
U
)H
<1J
-4->
CO
rt)
u
C
n)
j
TJ
n.
m
r-H

O
V


^->
n.
I-H r™i
o
00
i-H
o



CO

-------
          TABLE 17.  AUTOPSY CASES - LOS ANGELES
Sample I. D.    Age     Sex
  A 7572
  A 7593
  A 7617
  A 7653
  A 7657
64
44
69
12
74
M
M
M
M
M
 Smoking
 History

  No
  Yes
Unknown
  No
  Yes
                             Cause of Death
Pancreatic CA
Cardiac arrest
Carcinoma larnyx
Aplastic anemia
Carcinoma urinary bladder
  A 7561
  A 7587
  A 7621
  A 7654
  A 7658
67      F       Yes         Acute lymphacytic leukemia
41      F     Unknown       Adenocarcinoma cervix
79      F     Unknown       Hypotension/hypoproteinemia sep
65      F       Yes         Myocardial infraction
47      F       No          Hypertensae eerebrovascular
                             accident
                               124

-------
TABLE 18.  PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM IN AUTOPSY
              SAMPLES - LOS ANGELES

Liver
Kidney
Spleen
Lung
Muscle
Fat
Pt
Ppb
< 0.24
< 2.6
< 1. 3
< 1. 3
< 0. 9
< 1.3
Pd
Ppb
< 0. 6
< 6.7
< 3. 3
< 3. 3
< 2.2
< 1. 6
                        125

-------
       These results indicate that baseline levels of platinum and




palladium in environmental samples and in human populations in the




Southern California area are extremely low.  The levels in all instances,




other than composite samples, are below the detection limits of atomic




absorption.







       L.    Lead
             a.     Environment




                   The air lead determinations made from the samples




collected 80 feet downwind from the freeway in Los Angeles and outside




the residences of the Lancaster participants are presented in Table 19.




The statistical analysis of these air lead data is presented in Table 20.




The square root transformed data was used in conducting the t test,




because  it  gave acceptable variance equality for the Los Angeles and




Lancaster  sites.  The t test  shows that the average lead concentration in




the air approximately 80 feet downwind from the San Diego Freeway in




Los Angeles was very significantly greciter than that in the air in the




backyards  of the Lancaster participants.




                   The configuration and lead  determinations of the soil




samples taken near the San Diego Freeway in Los Angeles  are shown in




Figure 8.  These lead determinations are plotted in Figure 9  as a




function  of the distance in the prevailing upwind and downwind directions




from the San Diego Freeway at the two  Los Angeles soil sampling




locations.  Figure  9 illustrates  the general agreement of the soil lead
                               126

-------
     Table  19.    Baseline  Air  Lead  Sample  Data
                                                       3
                           Air  Lead  Concentration,  ;ag/m

                           Los  Angeles         Lancaster
                             Site                Site

                           6.84               0.40
                           5.83               0.83
                                              0.60
                                              0.51
                                              0.44
                                              0.41
                                              0.64
                                              0.58
                                              0.48
                                              0.87
                                              1.03
                                              0.90
                                              0.69
Number of samples         2                   13


Mean                      6.34                0.64


Standard Deviation        0.71                0.21
                                   127

-------
                            TABLE  20.

         COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BASELINE AIR LEAD DATA
                                       Data Transformations
Means
     Los Angeles
     Lancaster

Variances

     Los Angeles
     Lancaster

Equality of Variance

     P Test Statistic
     Variance equality

Equality of Means

     t Test Statistic
     P value
                                None
   6.34
   0.64
   0.510
   0.042
   12.03
No, P=.005
            Square Root
2.516
0.794
0.0155
0.0159
1.024
Yes
             18.00
             P« .001
              Natural Log
 1.843
-0.484
 0.0128
 0.1000
 7.81
 No, P=.02
                               128

-------
                       FIGURE  8.


            BASELINE SOIL LEAD  SAMPLE DATA
     N
125 ft


 117
 10 ft
5043
                           W
o
o
w
t— I
Q
                           to
                   LEAD CONCENTRATIONS

                       IN SOIL, SAMPLES
                                Site; V.A. MEDICAL COMPLEX &

                                             CEMETERY
10 ft
125 ft
                        296
           100 ft
            77
       (CONTROL)
                20 ft
               100 ft
                   300 ft
                                   234
              Site; U. C.L.A. MARRIED STUDENT

                           HOUSING
                          129

-------
4800
3600
2400
1200
 600
   0


 Feet
       Lead Con
       in Soil-
         sentrationj
         Samples

                                                  Legend

                                            x U.C.L.A.  Married
                                              Student Housing
                                              Site

                                            o EPA Air Sampling
                                              Site (V.A. Medical
                                              Complex)
                                                                   \
  125   80   40    0    0   40   80   120       200         300
Upwind from Freew ;y                       Feet Downwind from Freeway

FIGURE 9.  SOIL LEAD CONCENTRATION WITH DISTANCE
            FROM THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY
                                   130

-------
data from the two Los Angeles sampling sites adjacent to the San Diego




Freeway with respect to distance downwind or upwind  from the express-




way.  Within ten feet of the expressway, the air turbulence created by





the vehicular traffic flow apparently distributes the emitted lead equally




on both the upwind and downwind sides of the expressway.  However,




the rate of reduction of soil lead concentration is much more gradual on




the prevailing downwind side of the expressway.  For  example,  at  a





distance of 100 to 125 feet from the expressway,  the downwind soil lead




concentration is from 3 to 9 times higher than the upwind soil lead




concentration.





                   The soil lead determination obtained at the Los




Angeles participants residence, the U.C.L.A. married student apart-





ments,  is compared against the seven Lancaster  soil lead  determinations





in Table 21.  The logarithmic transformation of the soil lead determinations




is chosen for conducting the Dixon gap test of the potential Los Angeles




outlier, because  it best satisfies the normality assumption of the Dixon




test and because  it yields the most conservative test.  The Dixon test




indicates the Los Angeles  sample definitely is an outlier from the




Lancaster soil sample population.  Thus, the soil lead concentration at




the Los Angeles participants' apartment complex was  significantly




greater than the soil lead concentration in the  Lancaster participants'





backyards.




                   The lead concentrations were  determined for five





samples of tap water obtained both from the Los Angeles participants'
                               131

-------
                            TABLE 21.

          OUTLIER ANALYSIS OF BASELINE SOIL LEAD DATA
Lancaster Samples
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lancaster Mean
Lancaster Standard Deviation
Los Angeles Sample


Combined Site Statistics

Mean

Standard Deviation

Dlxon gap test statistic

Outlier
                                None
           3633
                                        Data Transformations
                     Square Root
               Natural Log
54
43
49
79
62
83
98
66.9
20.2
7.35
6.56
7.00
8.89
7-87
9-11
9-90
8.09
1.23
60.27
               3-99
               3-76
               3-89
               4.37
               4.13
               4.42
               4.58

               4.16
               0.30
8.20




4.67

1.45

0.815

Yes,
                                             .001
                                132

-------
apartments and from the Lancaster participants' homes.  The lead




data and its statistical analysis are presented in Table 22.  There was




no significant difference between the mean lead concentrations of the




tap water supplied to the Los Angeles and Lancaster participants.




                   The building surfaces of the U.C.L.A. married





student housing facility were  examined for lead, and the values were





less than 3.0 mg/g of dried paint.







             b.    Study Participants





                   The standard t test of two independent samples was




utilized to  compare corresponding  participant groups from the two sites





with respect to significant differences in population means. Site





comparisons were conducted  for each tissue on the total participant




groups and on subgroups stratified by sex and age. The t test assumes





both sampled populations are normally distributed with  equal variances.




                   The normality assumption was  examined by testing




the skewness of the group observations.  The skewness test was applied




to the data and its square root and  logarithmic transformations to  determine




which transformation produced the least skewed data (i.e., the trans-




formation under which the normal distribution assumption was best




justified).  Table 23 displays  the results  of the skewness tests by P value.





The smaller the P value, the  less justified is the normal distribution





assumption.  P values above  0.05 are interpreted  as accepting the normal




distribution assumption; such a result is  denoted as OK in Table 23.
                               133

-------
                            TABLE 22.

      COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BASELINE TAP WATER LEAD DATA
Tap Water Sample Lead Concentrations
Square Root Transformation of
Tap Water Lead Data
Los Angeles

   0.040
   0.019
   0.024
   0.021
   0.028

   0.200
   0.138
   0.155
   0.145
   0.167
Square Root Transformation Statistics
     Mean                               O.l6l
     Standard Deviation                 0.024
     Variance                           0.00060
Lancaster

   0.036
   0.022
   0.019
   0.021
   0.022

   0.190
   0.148
   0.138
   0.145
   0.145
                    0.154
                    0.021
                    0.00043
Equality of Variance
     F test statistic
     Variance equality

Equality of Means
     t test statistic
     Mean equality
           1.38
           Yes
           0.50
           Yes, (P=.64)
                                134

-------
"ABLE Z3.  Skewness Test of Normal Distribution Under Various Transformations
               of the Baseline Human Subject Lead Determinations
                                              Transformation
None

Tissue
Blood


Long Hair


Short Hair


Urine


Feces



Group
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
L.A.
P Value
<. 01
<. 01
<. 01
<. 01
<.01
<.01
«. 01
<-. 01
. 01
<. 01
<.01
< . 01
«. 01

-------
Inspection of Table 23 shows that,  for most of the grouped participant




lead data, the natural logarithm transformation yields data for which




the normal distribution assumption is valid.  In those few cases when




the natural log transformed data were not normally distributed, it still




gave less skewness to the data than either the untransformed or square




root transformed data.  With respect to the t test's normality




assumption, the natural logarithm transformation of the blood, hair,




urine, and feces lead data is consistently preferable to either the square




root transformation or no transformation.




                   The validity of the assumption of equality of variance




between participants  within the two t test compared groups was examined




by the standard variance ratio F test.   Equality of variance was  tested




for the comparable groups at the two sites using the untransformed tissue




lead data, the square root transformed  data, and the natural log  trans-




formed data.  The F  statistic and associated P value are presented for




each comparison in Table 24.  P values above 0.05 are interpreted as




accepting the equality of variance assumption; such P values are simply




denoted as OK in Table 24.   Examination of Table 24 discloses that the




natural log transformation is clearly superior to  no transformation or




the square root transformation in equalizing the variability within the




compared groups.  The natural log transformation yielded acceptable




variance equality in every case for the blood,  urine, and feces lead data.




On the long and short hair lead data, the logarithmic transformation was




uniformly better than  either the square root transformation or no trans-




formation in equalizing the variability of the compared groups.




                               136

-------
TABLE Z4.  Test of Variance Equality Under Various Transformations of
            the Baseline Human Subject Lead Determinations
                                           Transformation
None
Tissue
Blood
Long Hair
Short Hair
Urine
Feces
Group
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
F Statistic
3.32
3.52
2.53
1.98
7.98
1. 12
31. 35
45.63
9. 38
1.87
1.92
3.01
1.44
2.66
2.71
P Value
<§.. 001
<. 001
<. 001
<. 001
«. 001
OK
«. 001
«. 001
«. 001
<. 001
. 009
<. 001
.02
<. 001
<. 001
Square Root
F Statistic
1.94
1.98
1.58
2.07
3.82
1.55
6.14
8.16
3.57
1.04
1.47
1.22
1.07
1.31
1.80
P Value
<. 001
. 005
. 03
<. 001
<. 001
. 04
«.001
«. 001
<. 001
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
. 008
Natural
F Statistic
1. 15
1. 16
1.02
1.41
2.35
1. 18
1.80
2. 13
1.48
1. 19
1.16
1. 14
1. 18
1. 11
1.29
Log
P Value
OK
OK
OK
.04
.004
OK
. 003
.006
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
                                   137

-------
                   Since the natural logarithm transformation was so




uniformly superior in achieving the t test assumptions,  it was applied




to each set of compared data prior to the conduct of its t test.  To assist




in interpreting the results based upon the natural log transformed data,




the geometric mean has been reported.  The geometric  mean is the




reverse (i.e., exponential) transformation of the mean of the natural log




transformed data back into the original lead concentration data scale.




                   A summary of the lead concentration data obtained




for each sex and age subgroup at the two sites is  shown  in Tables 25A,




25B,  25C,  25D, and 25E  for the five tissues sampled.  The data for




individual values for lead are provided in Appendix C. The statistics




contained in Table 25 are N (the number of participants  in the group




providing at least one analyzed sample of the tissue),  the arithmetic mean




of the untransformed data for the group  (X), + the standard deviation of




the arithmetic mean (s —=  s / \/N), and the geometric mean.




                   Table  25  reveals the general characteristics of the




lead concentration data from the two baseline sites for each of the five




types of samples.  The average lead concentrations of the Los Angeles




participants were generally higher than  those of the corresponding sex




and age group of Lancaster participants for the blood, long hair, short




hair, and urine samples.   However, the average lead concentration in




the feces of the Los Angeles participants was about the same or less than




the average lead concentration in the Lancaster participants' feces




samples.





                                138

-------
03
g
H

      2
nj
)H
o
a
o
U
      bo
      Q
      O
      O
 g    Q
£    <
U    W
cq



in


 D
^^

 rS
H
ficance
ference
P
" /^
oo •-1
w "g
o
0 2
rt ."S
PH C 4)
W flj -^
H ^
w •* "o
a-s >
Z « M
< 6 P
-J JC
< w
+1
*»»^
2:
0
4J ..,
6 S
o
w _, "g"
U rt S
i-5 (U 5
w 2
^ y °
< w >
813
i "3
"i CO
0
0
kl
O
o
o
^
vO

•*
0
+1
m
o
»-H
cr-
p-H
rH
vO
•*

r-
o
+1

0
(M
t— t
TOTAL
••H •— i O1
O O O O
0000
V V
V V
00 ^ 0 -I
o o o -H
1— 1 1— 1 p— t I— 1
\O 00 O^ C3
O O O f\]
+1 -«-l +1 -H
00 — < 00 O
»-H p-H •— 1 CO
O — t 00 — <
in (M — < •-"
(M 00 — i «-i
t^« o in t^

-H m —i o
r-l (\J I— 1 (NJ
+1 +1 +1 +1
fO lO ^O U")
0> CO vO 00
in IM N
MALES
I
II
III
_< _< i— 1 —1
O O O O
o o o o
$J V V V
CO sO O t--
oo ^^ oo oo
T^ r^- (\i u^
o o — i o
xD rj »~* <*>
CT^ tO •^O 00
NO CM *-* (M
00 0s 00 "'•J*
CM Tj< f-l M

r- oo o m
O 1-4 O — <
+| +| +1 +1
(Nj f— O t^
Tj< 0 (M •*
O 00 .—«•-•
W
                                        139

-------
 ri
 S
 a
 3
co
 fl
 o
 G
 v
 o
 fl
 o
U

13
 n)
 0)
«
in
(Sl
 A
 n)
 H
60

DO



fi

S

O

O


»—I

Q

W
O ,i
0 £
% 4)
0 *<
S)Q
w o
0
i 0
Geome
i) Mea
tf e £

!2 "o
**« O
u •- . •
2 o ,0
^ J Q
<• w
a
y
Vi
£ C
erf
«
o •<
o •*«
O
CO £•
« s s
W S ^
O
y (J °
< 'cJ >
o 1 Q
j j-»
M t?
< CO
2

c
c
O

i—4 «— <
C3 1|\t* ^^ 1 1
• ^3 ^5 ^? • *
^ ' 3


O «— * O1* CO C^

»-t 00 O iTI PO
cO fM ro ro CO
i— i
+ 1 4-1 -H +1 -H


po ro r- M ^o
0s •— < O O ^*
^^ CM rsi fvj N
O^ ^* ^3 ^^ 00
O -^ fM rH
«— t

M vD t""~ tO *cj*
(V] (NJ -^ ^4 r-i
ro oo o r* o
^ r- c^ rM o
4-1 -H +1 4-1 4-1
,
^ co o^ in o
^< rt" m co (si
in in co *& co
t-i T}< —1 (SI

J w
< w
H -1 >-< S
0 j — -

•-H r-H *-H
O O O vD
O O O 0
V V
V?  r*- iA o
O1" fO' 00 00
1— t
0v tn o^ »-^
r^< (\J r-^ CJ
-H -t-1 -hi -H


^•4 CO O1* ^<
as r~ o co
f-^ •-* •-> (si
ui (si r~ vo
vi^ (Si ^H (Si

o vO m co

-------
 n)
IQ
 c
 0
 O

 O
U

T)
 n)
 0)
 o>
•C
U
in
rg
-Q
 tt
H
       00

       00
H

O

W
Significance
of Differenc
P
u
•r-4
0> nj

O
04 C v
W m -^
HO <^
s^
Z « o
«j | Q
4-1 •
<• w
u
•r-«
In
3 c
c rt
C <
w 2
S u o
< 4> >
w g ®
O JG Q
M 13
4-
-z,
c
c
u
O
O O O 1 Os
o o o 1 o
r- rsl oo csj oo
^ ^ fSl rj. fsl

f> os m co M<
•-" rH rsl fSl sO
±J ' ±!±J±!il

m r- so so o<
y;'
00 in ro CO O^
CO ^ fsl -H
co ro »— * in co
CO \O ^* *~< Csl
co co t^« rsl ^
o fsi os co m
p- rsl *J* »™ < oo
-H csi •-« rsl
+1 +1 4-1 -M +1
rsl '— < rsl in ro
O^ in -H rsj
J w
3 w
H J « a
o S - - -1
H 2
~* •— « in
o o r- o
o o o o
CO *— * CO CO
O O Os! O

r- o o ~»
—• rsl m  fO
r-H i-H
+1 4-| 4-1 4-1
^ ^
ro O CO !***
FEMALES
I
II
III
                                             141

-------
 I
w
 rt
Q

 c
 o
      DO
5   w
c   2
4J   r)T|

C   ^
O   P

O   2

•O   M

2   n
CQ



Q
in
 oi

H
 R
4) nJ
V
O
ti 4)
rt «

£ .
4> «
S Q
4-» •
t-t 4->
< w
+1

Z.
o
S c
grt
4)
0 ^
0> *5
O
C rt
n) 0.
S
u 'o
•r-l
*-> •
Q) >
la
4J
'M -c
•*! w

^

a
^
o
O


r-l ^-4 p-H fi CO
0 0 0 ~< 1 C' 1 1 0
o o o o 1 o 1 1 o
^ v
ro OvOOifi OC> r*- iTj sO
co oo^ooov r-- <^r~^


O OO'-tOsO^ f^-fOfsloO
-H O i— < O (Nl i-H -I}1 •— 1 O
4-1 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-\ 4-1 4-1 4-1 +\


\f) >o CD ^5 LO u*i r**- CT^ ^o
O O«-HQ^{V3 O^COf*

x/
i— t i— t I-H O^ '— * O >O ^O 00
(si m tsj >-i •— i r-por-'tsi
in CM ^* vD in to ^ •— * ^
-M trim— ~^
!< w -«
Q -^ *-^ •— * »y *~* •" < >~ <
H S h
                                         142

-------
 rt
 s
 s
 a
CO
 rt
Q

 c
 o
 C
 1)
 o
u
•o
 1)

I—I
 II
 to
 rt"
CQ
W
m
(M
 rt
H
 bO
to
W
U
W
* u
w rt
5 4)
d r,
y «
v3 t! (X
•-1 -t)
SQ
^
u
'S 0
4) ri
£^
o 2
0)
O
f*
ti a 5
M nj ^
H^ S
2^0
< y
U •" •
5, *» >
2c W M
< SP
»-J x;
4J •
•s ^
< CO
-4-1
'^w'

2;
u
•f-l
l-l
« S
P *1
G 
to S «
o % Q
-I 3 .
l-i *O
< to
H-

S5

D
3
Q
I-,
O



r-H
O
• o
V

m
o
0



0?
o
o
+l


ro
ro
•— t


ro
t— i
•—i
o
o
0


o
o
o
+1


o
o
o

Tt<
ro
r-t

A
<
H
O
H



MM


r>- m — < ro
00 O 00 I--
o -i o o



ro CO CO rf
•— i -
m — t ro

to

-J t— 1
VJ *-* *— *
rf »— 1 t-^ k-^
2


-H —!•<}<
O O O O
o o o o
V V
V V
i
— < vO vO O3
o ro —i f-
«—l •— 1 •— I O



o —i •* ro
•— i ro i—i «-i
O O O O
+1 H-l H-l +1


t^ O \J< *O
ro vO ro O
r-< ^H r-l O


r^ ^ m oo
O (M r-t rO
\
•* — i oo r-
o o m "f
0 0 O O


vo -^ \o in
O — I O O
0 0 0 O
+1 -H H-l H-l


so o^ r— 01*
r~ o ^ •*
o -i o o

ro «-i — i O
t-- ro •<*< •-«
to
J
^
2 H M
tq t-1 a >-«
k
                                            143

-------
                   The validity of the Table Z5 observations was examined.




utilizing the t test of the logarithmically transformed lead concentration




data to determine the significance of the observed differences.  The




results are presented via the two sided t test statistic and its P value in




Table  Z6.




                   The mean lead concentrations in the blood, long hair,




short hair, and urine of the total group of Los Angeles participants were




very significantly higher than the corresponding mean lead concentrations




of the  total group of Lancaster participants ( P «. 001 for each of the four




tissues).   There was also a  significant elevation of the mean blood lead,




long hair lead, short hair lead, and urine  lead levels of the male and




female subgroups of Los Angeles participants  over the corresponding




Lancaster  group.  The  inferences    for the comparable sex-age subgroups




across site were less consistent; this finding may be attributable to the




smaller  sample sizes,  the absence of any real difference, or both of these




factors.  However, in general,  the younger age group (1-16) tended to




show more significant lead level elevation in Los Angeles than the adult




age groups did.




                   In contrast,  the feces lead  levels of the Los Angeles




participants were significantly lower than those of the Lancaster




participants (P <.001). This effect was most pronounced for the two




adult female  groups.




                   A more detailed statistical description of the  site-sex-




age groups' lead  levels  in blood, long hair, short hair,  urine, and feces
                               144

-------
c
0
0
is
-P
0
coJ

CM
O

4^
02
0
EH
0
O
C
03
CJ
•H
CM
                0
•H rH
C  O)
bO>
•H
CO PI-
         rH
         O
         O
rHrHCV-l
OOOCT\
OOOO
                       OOOO
                       OOOO
                                                            r-H
                                                            O
                                                            O
                                                         ^r o
                                                         OO
                                                                             OO
0 O 0 VD
OOOO
O
O
rH rH
O O
OO
   CA
O  O
O,
3
O
fn
O
ft

03
0
O
C
0
!M
0
r. .
M— t
CM
•H W
Q -P
C
C CT3
o a
•H -H
-P 0
03 -H
fn -P
43 P-.
£ 03
0 PM
CJ
C M
O CD
0 -P
03
rrX (T^
O LU
o) o
0 C
J 03
J
C
03 T3
0 C
S cti

43 W
C CD
03 H
O CD
•H bO
CM C
_i eH
•rl ^*<
C
bow
o
•H
-p
to
•H ^=r
43 00
o)
43 CO
CO
4^









03
C
03
0
s

o
•H
p,
M
4-5
0
6
o
0
0

T3
0
JH
03
a,
a
o
0
PH
0
4^>
02 VD
03
O O~\
C
o3
, i
^H



co
0
rH
0
bO
C vo
<
-=r
CO rH
O
J


                                                                                                                                    C
                                                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                                                    O
                              CXDCXJONCM
                              O^TCMOO
                                              ^TO\OO
                              voLnrorH
                                                 O
                                                 -
                                                                                                           CM CO CM CO
                                                                                                           OO CM
                                                                                      CM
                                                                                      rH
                              CMCOrHrH   COCT\CO^r    CM
                                   •   •
                                 •O  LTV t-
                                  CM  rH i-
                                               CM^TrHOO    D--
                                               rHrHHrH    CM
                                                                      VD l>- 00-^-

                                                                      ^3- CT\ I
                                                                                      o VD m oo
                                                                                                     OO
                                                          CM
                                                0
                       0)
                       43
                       O
                       EH
                    rHrHI+
                    o3  I  t-in
                    SHrHOO
                 firHI+    -P
                 0  I  r-LT\     o
                 ferHrHOO    FH
                                                0 VO  OO
                                               rH rH   1  +
                                                oi  I  f-un
                                               S rH  rH OO
                                                                          cr\ cr> cr\ CT\
                                                                          CM LT\ rH H
0
rH    ^3-
03 VD 00
S rH  I  +
0  I  O- LPv
Pn rH rH 00
                                                                       OO
                                                                       OO
                                                                                               OO rH LH OO

                                                                                                      H CM
                                                                                    VO
                                                                                    OO
                                                                                                     CM
O)
4J
O
EH
0 vo oo
H rH  I  +
o)  I  f~ in
S rH rH 00
  0
  O)
  EH
  0
  3
  ra
  co
    E
   O
73 O
O H
O X
rH  bO
                                •H
                                 o3
                                ffi

                                 hO M
                                 C\
                                 O  bO
                                                                                                     £H
                                                                                                     •H
                                                                                                     03
                                                                                         w
                                                                                                         bO
                                                                                                        \
                                                                                                         bO
                                                               145

-------
          0
          o
          C
          o3
          o
         •H  0
         CM  3
         •H rH
          C  CTJ
         •H
         CO CM
      rH rH    LP\
      O O t— O
      o o o o
                                 o
                                 o
                  ^
H rH
O O rH
O O O  O
 •  •  • S
V
                     oo      oo
                     O       O
                     O  O  O O
rH
O
0
                                                                               V
                                                                            o  o  o  o
O O~*\ O O
O O O O

          o
         •H
         -P
          CO
         •H
         -P
          Ctf
         -P
         CO
on o\ o oo
t>- f— CT\ O
invo H oo
AT
o
LTV
•=!• co i>- t>-
rH inurv c\j
-=r oo oj H
ch o cr\^3-
rH Lf\-=T rH
00 rH rH 00
00
rH
^3-
1
CM LT\^r CM
O O CM O
rH O rH O
1 1 1 1
O^CO O ^T
co t~- oo o
-3- rH in oo
1 I 1 I
ra
C
cd
(D
S

o
•H
PH
-P
(D
S
O
0)
O
T3
0
in
03
a
s
O
O,
^
(D
-P
CO
cci
o
c
cd
J




CO
0)
[
l~~1
0
M
C
<

w
O
J
                           OO rH OOOO
                           O o CM
                           rH rH H
                                          OO

                                          CO
                                                ovooin
                                                                               in
                                                                               cr\
                                                                                              CM
                                                                t—
                                                                           co  o co t~~

                                                                           O  rH O O
                                                                                           rH MD MD OO
                                                                                           O CM H I>-
                                                                                                    rH rH rH O
                           CM O t>- OO
                                          in
                                                CM
                                                     • vo  in    rovo rH -
                                                                               VD
                                                                                     VD OOVD H
                                                                                     >-O VD C—
                                                                                                       rHOO t-
                           o oo oo cr\
                           OOVO CM CM
                                                OO LPv rH  OO
                                                      O CM O-N O
                                                      rH rH    H
                                                                                     O rH O O
                                                                                                    o o o o
-O

-P

O
ro

0
rH
.0
05
EH
          Q,
          3
          O
0
3
co
co
0
rH ^T
cd VD oo
e H i +
0 I r-in
PH H rH OO
Total
0 vo oo
rH rH 1 +
ctf I t-- in
S H H 00
0
rH ^T
Kj VD 00 +
S rH 1

-------
was developed on computer printouts.  These printouts are presented




in Appendix  E.




                   Because of concern over possible adverse health




effects from the elevated lead levels found in the Los Angeles participants,




the sampling of high blood lead  concentrations ^as examined further.




The number and percentage of the blood samples with lead concentrations




above 40 jag/100 ml are tabulated in Table 27. Only five blood lead




concentrations above 40 (j.g/100 ml were  sampled: four from Los Angeles




boys aged 8, 8, 10,  and 12; one from a 15-year-old Los Angeles girl.




The only blood lead level above 50 jag/100 ml was 58.8  jag/100 ml from




one of the 8-year-old boys.




                   The lead concentrations of the blood, hair,  urine, and




feces samples from the participants at the two sites were also related




to various potentially pertinent  factors in addition to sex and age.  These




additional factors were preschool/nursery vs. children in  school, length




of residence in the city, distance from the expressway, distance from




other major highways, type of air conditioning,  level of cigarette smoking,




ethnic grouping,  and occupation.  Appendix F presents the geometric




lead concentration mean for all levels of each of  these factors for each




of the five tissues sampled.   Examination of Appendix F   shows that none




of these factors  exhibit a consistent effect at both sites. The apparent




factor effect generally results from the unequal  allocation of the factor




among the participants at the  two sites, or by correlation of the factor




with the sex or age of the participants.
                               147

-------
              o
              o
 w
 -p
 fl
 o3
 a
 •H
 o
 •H
 -P
 fc
 03
 PL,

 CU
 c
 •H
 H
 CD
 CQ
 03
 CQ

 C
 •H

 K)
 C
 O
 •H
 4J
 03
 c
 CD
 O
 C
 O
o
             .=r

              CD

              o

              o3
 o
 o
H
CQ
   us.

   -p
    £
    CD
    O
    ?H
    CD
   CM
 CQ
 CD
H
 Q.

 03
CO
 !H
 CD
£1
 6

>z
                           O O
                                    on o o
                                                  o o o
                                                               o o o
^3-00
              H O O     O O O
                                        o o o
o
o
H cQ
CQ CD
rH
*M CX
o S
• 03
O CO






onvo -=r en 'CM H
CM m rH CM OO CM

                                    OOOOCM
 03
 0)
 O
 O
H
PQ
 bO
•H
 hO
 C
o3
CO
0)
H
X3
03

CD
bfl

-------
                   Appendix  F  does suggest possible relationships




between some factor/site combinations and the lead concentration for




more than one tissue.  The Los Angeles preschool and nursery children,




who remained in their apartment complex adjacent and downwind from




the San Diego Freeway all day, appear to have had slightly higher lead




concentrations in their blood,  long hair, and short hair than did the older




Los Angeles school children (who attended schools at a  considerable




distance from the expressway).  The Los Angeles participants seem to




have increased lead levels in their long hair, short hair, and urine with




longer lengths of residence in Los Angeles.  The Lancaster participants




living  within two blocks of major highways appear to have higher lead




level s in their long and short hair than do  the Lancaster participants




living  farther from major highways.  Los Angeles participants living in




non-air-conditioned homes  seem to have higher lead concentrations in




their blood, long hair,  and short hair than do the Los Angeles participants




whose homes had air conditioning.




                   The significance of each of these apparent relationships




was investigated using a t test. The results are presented in Table 28.




There is no significant elevation of the mean lead levels in the blood and




hair of the preschool and nursery Los Angeles children over those of the




older Los Angeles children.  As the participants' length of residence in




Los Angeles increased,  there was a very significant increase in their




mean urine lead level.  However, the relationship of mean hair lead to




length of residence in Los Angeles remains uncertain.  The Los Angeles






                               149

-------
    CD
    3
Pn rH
    Cd
oo
rH
           CO
            o
                                                               o
                                                               o
    o
   •H
   -P
    co
P -H
   -P
    cd
   .p
   CO
CO
en

o
                                   » d
p  cd
•H -H
rH  rH
 Cd  Cd
 3 >
 D1
 co
 0)
                 0)
                >H
co
0)
                                                   CO
                                                   0)
                                                  >H
CO
0)
a >
O CO
•H 3

cd •
E a
rH P
CQ O W



OOLTV CTNO
V£> UD LT\ O



OOH ^3-O vo t~-



CO OO
U30O LT\H VOOO COCM
^T-=T [•— t — OOLTv OO ON O -=3" LTV
• • • »
00 00
ft CM
•H CO
X! C
co cd
C rH
0 EH
•H LT\ t— -* 00
P • C
cd faO cd
rH O CD
CD rJE
c— - en H cr\
OM>- rHOO
• • • »
CM CM ^3-OO
en
rH
o
p
o
cd o
ft, «H
rH -PC
cd CD cd
C 6 CD
0 OS
•H 0)
-P C3




VO •=?• CM rH
. • • •
CT\VO rH CTN
rH rH V£>^3-
•H

jTH rH >j-H
CO O rH XJ O fn XI
O CD O O CD 0
CO X! CO XI M
0 CJrHrH •'OrHrH rH
rH CQ3CD iHC030 -H
CD (DC73 »H0C!73 Cd
hO fa rH Cd rH rH W
C "On O W PH O
3-H -H
O fn X! CO
O 0 O 0
X! to (£
O rH fH
CO 3 0 CM
0 C 73 O
fn H
PH O X!
P
bO
rjj
0
J









^r en en LT\ H LT\
. .
CM CM ^3- f-
• •
cn oo
CM OO CM OO H










co cn CM cr\ en c —
CM OO CM CM CM ^3-








000
SH IH rn
rH O rH O rH O
cd S cd E cd E
0 0
>J rH >> ?-
0
( >> rH
O O O
H •• H
CO rH W
fa fa fa -H rH f-
•H O >3 Cd O >
cd X
K o -=r o ^3
P
M rH
C 0
o X!
I-H1 CO
H
! CO
i rH !H
•9 O >3

•• o -=r
0
C
•H
rH
P
                                                                                                                     p
                                                                                                                      c
                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                     o
                                                  150

-------
    0
    3
O-l rH
    03
    o
   •H
   -P
    W
-p -H
   -P
    Cd
   -P
   CO
C\J
o
LT\
 O
 O

V
                  co
                                        oo
CXI
o
                                     cr\
                                     o
                                                                                            on
                                                                                            o
                                                       in
                                                       on

                                                       rH
                                                    co
    0
    o
 >3  d
-P  cd
•H -H
H  PH
 Cd  03
 3 >
 O1
W ^
    O
0)
                   m
                   0
                      K>
                      0
                ra
                0
               >H
                                                    in
                                                    o
-p
03
S
 O 4J -H •• -P O -P vH -H
O E PH O S -P
PntorH0 -HtorH0 -H
-HWXJPHrH cdWXJPnH TJ
cd 0 O W 0 O C
K J S i-4 S O
-P 0
bO PH
£ 0 PH
o x: -H
l-H CO  CT\
0 rH -.






PH rH
O 03
PH
IS JJ
0 C
0 13 0 PH
C C O -H
O -H Cd
••^•^ K
rQ
0 bO
0 C
rH O
PQ J


vo ^3-
• •
co cr\
CM rH








C-— U3
ON rH






PH rH
0 03
PH
•5 -P
0 C PH
0 T3 0 -H
C d O cd
O -H K
s [s
-p
PH
O
X!
CO


rH rH
• •
V£> O
00 CM








H 00
CO rH






PH H
O Cd
PH
£ -P
o c
0^0
C G 0
O -H
S IS





                                                151

-------
residents whose homes were air-conditioned had significantly lower




average blood and short hair lead levels; than the Los Angeles




residents living in homes without air conditioning.  The Lancaster




participants living within two blocks  of a major highway had very




significantly higher mean short hair lead levels and  significantly higher




mean long hair lead levels than the Lancaster participants living more




than a mile from any major highway.  While some of the preceding




findings regarding the additional factors are significant, the indicated




relationships should not be construed to have been demonstrated. The




combination of uncontrolled factors and chance provides a plausible




alternative to these significant factors.




             c.   Autopsy - Los Angeles




                   Table 29 shows the results of the analysis  of autopsy




tissues from Los Angeles for lead.  As described  earlier in this report,




these autopsy cases are from a hospital via a pathologist.  They are not




from accidental death cases.  The data are similar to those collected




for other  lead studies. There are not sufficient samples to describe the




lead content with regards to age,  sex, length of residency in Los Angeles,




smoking history, etc.







             d.    Sources of Variation in Human  Lead
                   Determinations




                   Two blood, urine, and feces  samples were obtained




on consecutive days from most of the Los Angeles and Lancaster




participants.  Table 30 presents the between participant and within
                               152

-------
         TABLE  29.    AUTOPSY TISSUES (Los Angeles)




                Lead Values (|J.g/g - Wet Tissue)
Tissue No.    Kidney    Fat     Spleen    Muscle   Lung    Liver
Male
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
A 7653
A 7593
A 7572
A 7617
A 7657
0.00
0.26
0.37
0.59
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
.05
.02
.13
.02
.02
1
0
0
1
0
.23
.28
.10
.93
.11
0
0
0
0
0
.06
.13
.00
.03
.06
0
0
0
2
0
.08
.08
.00
.06
.14
1.02
0.53
0.47
1.31
0.64
Female
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
A 7587
A 7658
A 7654
A 7561
A 7621
0.05
0.20
0.15
0.45
0.03
0
0
0
0
0
.04
.06
.00
.09
.00
0
0
0
0
0
.55
.12
.08
.39
.15
0
0
0
0
0
.02
.10
.02
.39
.04
0
0
0
0
0
.01
.13
.12
.00
.20
0.70
0.54
0.73
0.76
0.63
                              153

-------
          G  I)
          cd  o
          o  C
          •H  CD     0)
          
£i
PH
•~-^
c
H

CU
3
0
FH





co
-p
C
cd
,--1
v-ii
£ -H
•H O
£3 iH
•P -P
•H FH
*sr ni
^S CD
P-l
co
-P
C
cd
c a
0 1-1
0 CJ
3S -H
•p -p
0 FH
mrrt
to
P-,

01
fco
<\





rH ^3- 00 00 rH CO f-VD rH
0 UD rH CT\ H 00 ^TI^Ln
-=3- t>- [— • O CT\CO OOCO^3-
OJOO HOO OOO







oot-~-=r VDOOLH ^.-HCJN
-=TCOLTv rHl>-l>- OLPvLO
rHrHrH t--O~\O CMCTvO
CMrHrH HOrH HOOO

-=3-^3-^3-
>>O OO VO OO VD OO
H 1 4- rH 1 H- H 1 +
1 t-- LT\ 1 t— LTv 1 [~-LT\
HHOO HHOO HHOO





^O LTv OO
in [—vo
^3- co -=r
OOO







oo oo oo
in o vo
c^cr\ rH
O rH H

-3-
VO OO
rH 1 +
I t>~m
H H OO





UD LH rH
rH rH OA
^T rH OO
rH CM rH







in ^3- UD
VO OO LPl
[--co co
rH CM C\J

^3-
VD OO
H 1 +
I c^in
H rH OO





^3- LPiVO
vo OMn
oo oj in
rH rH rH







i>-oo oo
CM O CM
O i— 1 CM
^3- CM CM

^3-
UD OO
rH 1 +
1 t>- in
H rH 00





mvo CM
C^v rH 00
0^,00 [--
O O rH







OA^T O-
^J- O CM
cr\vo MD
rH rH OO

^3-
V£) OO
rH 1 +
I t^in
rH rH 00





OO [-- CJN
^3- oo oo
OO rH CO
rH rH 0







in 00^3-
o in a\
-=r co ^3-
00 rH rH

^3-
vo oo
rH 1 +
1 i>-in
H rH 00
-P
£
cd
D,
•H
O
•H
-P
k
Cd
PH
 0
 O
 c
 cd
•H
 !H
 cd
    X
    0
   CO
 o
 FH
O
    0
    •P
    •H
    CO
rH
 cd
S
                            w
                                         0)
E
0
 co
 o
0
rH
cd
S
0
rH
cd

0
fc
              0
             -p
              co
              cd
              o
              C
              cd
0
rH
cd
S
                                                                    CO
                                                                    0
                                                                    rH
                                                                    0
                                                                    M

                                                                    C
                            CO
                            O
 0
rH
 cd
 E
 0
 0
rH
 cd
                                         0
                                         -p
                                         co
                                         cd
                                         o
                                         c
                                         cd
 0
rH
 cd

 0
o
CO
 0
 cd
EH
 0
 d
 w
 w
•H
EH
                            O
                            O
                                                       0
                                                       C
                                                      •H
                                                       f-,
                                                                   154

-------
-p
£ 0
ctf o
•H 0 0
t»H PH -P 3
•H 0 CO rH
C <*H 0 03
hO ^ LH £>
•H -H
r/o Q ft. n .






LA LA
rH 0 O
O O O O O O
5^ S 5^ ...






LA LAVO
O O O
0 O O






LA
O
0 O 0
                                            ~V \/     V y
-P
 C
 O
O
 co
 P.
 3
 O
 PH
 aj
 a,
•rH
 o
•H
-P
 ^
 cti
OH

 C
•H

 0
 O
 C
 cti
•H
 JH
 03
co
-p
C
03
0
o
S
•H
PH
03
>
2"
OH
V 	
c
rH

P<
O
PH
C5
P.
C -H
•H 0
f1 »r— J
A-< rn
-p -P
•H PH
IS 0)
OH
CO
-P
C
o!
C P,
0 -H
0 0
*> i
t^ rn
-P -P
0 PH
CQ 03
P.
3
O
   0
   -p
   •H
   CO
                             CM >-rH
                             O O C-—
                             OO LTvCT\
                             (AJ rH O
                           VO OO C\J
                            CM O OO
                            r>-Ln O
                            o o o
                         0s! OO ^3-
                         MD rH CT\
                         -=r moo
                         o o o
            VO OO CXI
            CVI H OA
            rH VO -3-
cr\ o oo
oo co o^
co co -=r
LACM 00
                                         co MD ^r
                                         C\J in rH
                                         CM 03 t—
                                         00 rH O
                                        CM in oo
                                        LPi rH OO
                                        oo o .=r
                                        LT\ OO LT\
                                                                        CM
               vo co      vo oo
               H  I  +    H  I  +
                I  t—LA     I  t—LA
               rH rH  00   rH rH 00
                0
               rH
                03
             0

             03

             0
             fe
                CO
                0
               rH
                0
                bO
 CO
 o
                         vo oo      vo  oo
                         H  I   +    rH   I  +
                          I  t~- LA     I  t— LA
                         rH rH  OO   rH  H OO
0
H
Ctf
0
rH
03
S
0
PH
0
-P
CO
03
o
C
03
o
rO

 0
 aj
EH
0
             CO
             co
               to
               0
               O
               0
                                                                  155

-------
participant variances of the natural log transformed lead determinations




within each site-sex-age-group.  The P value is tabulated in the last




column of Table 30 for those groups having a significantly smaller within




group variance than the between group variance.  In most groups, there




was no significant difference.  The implication in these cases  is that the




two samples  obtained on consecutive days from one person display about




as much variability in their lead determinations as two  samples taken




from two different people in the same group. The within group (i.e. ,




diurnal/sampling/analytical) variability is very large.




                   An additional blood sampling experiment was performed




to investigate the source of the within group variability.  Sixteen blood




samples were obtained simultaneously from an adult male and processed




and analyzed according to the same procedures used with the baseline




blood samples.  Two aliquots of each sample were processed  and analyzed;




their lead determinations are presented in Table 31.  An analysis of




variance of the logarithmically transformed blood lead determinations




is shown in Table 32.  There are no  significant differences between the




aliquots or between the samples.




                   The variance components estimated from the  sampling




experiment have been compared against the  participant and sampling




variances for the appropriate group (males aged 17 to 34) of Lancaster




and Los Angeles participants.  The comparison is shown in Table 33.




The repeatability variance accounts for about 13% of the between
                               156

-------
Table 31.   Blood Lead Determinations from Sampling Experiment
                              Blood Lead, jug/100 ml
        Sample               Aliquot A         Aliquot B
         1                   5-86              7-19
         2                   7-74              7-35
         3                   6.28              7.67
         4                   6.77              9.02
         5                   6.09              6.88
         6                   6.76              6.92
         7                   6.99              7-02
         8                   9-42              7-39
         9                   7.12              7.25
        10                   9-32              7.79
        11                   7.10              8.60
        12                   6.36              6.90
        13                   6.18              7.35
        14                   8.17              7-35
        15                   7.99              6.18
        16                   7.99              9.89
                             157

-------
   co
   G
   o
   •H
   4J
   cd
   G
   •H

   in
   
-------
-p
•H
 o
 o
                 CD rH
                 0 Cd
                 S -P
                 -P O
                 0 rH
                 CQ
                    -P
                 CM C
                 O cd
                    Q
                 -P -H
                 £ o
                 0 -H
                 CJ -P
                 ?H SH
                 0 Cd
                 CM p..
                             oo
                                             o

                                             oo
                                                          oo
G
rH
II
>H
                 0  OJ
                 -P  O
                 cd  G
                 S  cd
                 •H  -H
                 -P  IH
                 CO  Cd
          oo
          o\
          o
o
oo
o
oo

H
O

O
                                                          o

                                                          o
 CTJ
•H
 ^
 Oj
 cd
 OJ
 co  E
 
 0  £H
Q fe
                          LP\
                                             oo
                LT\
 co
 0)
 o
o
GO
CO
ro
0
0
o
;3
O
CO
ween participants
s Angeles and
-P O
0 i_3
CQ-^
0
bO
cd
co
0
rH
cd
0
to ^
cd-3-
o oo
C
cd
J
I
C--
rH
ween samples from
.P
0
CQ
ticipant (taken
£_,
cd

consecutive days)

c
o
ween samples
ken simultaneousl;
-P
0
CQ
cd
-P

idual (Processing,
to
0
cc
lytical method
cd

cd
eatability)
pl
0
fn
                                                        159

-------
participant variance.  The simultaneous sampling variance accounts




for another 5%.  The variability associated with sampling on consecutive




days contributes another 55% to the between participant variance.




Apparently there was much daily variability in the blood lead levels of




the participants in this study.




                   The individual blood lead analysis results are




presented in Appendix C.  In regard to sampling variation, a scan of the




data disclosed that  all 15 sampled blood lead concentrations above




30 jjtg/lOOml occurred in the first sample provided by Los Angeles




participants.  Most of the elevated blood lead values occurred in children,




some of whom were not sampled for blood on the second day.  Thus, of




the Los Angeles participants who provided two blood samples, there




were 10 blood lead  concentrations above 30 (jig/100 ml; in each of these




ten cases, the first sample concentration analysis was above 30 (og/lOOml,




and the second sample value was below 30 (j.g/100 ml.  This anomaly was




investigated further to determine whether there was a consistent lead




concentration bias between the first and second samples of the Los Angeles




and/or Lancaster participants.




                   A review of the blood shipment and lead analysis




procedures did not  detect any erroneous blood  lead values.  The sequence




in which the lead analyses of the blood samples were performed was the




only facet of the lead analysis procedure that might be relevant to  the




anomaly.  All of the first samples were analyzed before any of the




second samples. However,  to prevent a. site bias, the Los Angeles and






                                160

-------
Lancaster first sample lead analyses were properly interspersed;

so were the second sample lead analyses.

                   The cumulative sample distributions of the lead

concentration determinations for the 99 Los Angeles participants and

the 97 Lancaster participants who provided two blood samples are shown

below.  For both Los Angeles and Lancaster,  more of the high blood


                             l!Los Angeles          Lancaster	
                           First     Second      First     Second
                           Sample   Sample     Sample    Sample

# Samples   30|ag/100ml     10         0          00

# Samples   25|o.g/100ml     16         5          01

# Samples   20|j.g/100ml     28        14          35

# Samples   15|jLg/100ml     47        40         19         9

# Samples   10|j.g/100ml     70        79         48        36

# Samples    5|ig/100ml     98        97         90        91

Total Number of Samples     99        99         97        97



lead determinations occurred on the first sample than on the  second

sample.  The  two-sample  Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was utilized to test

for significant differences between the first sample and second sample

distributions.  Neigher for Los  Angeles (D =  .182;  P =  .08) nor for

Lancaster (D  =  .144;  P = .27)  did the first sample and the second

sample  distributions differ significantly at the 0.05 level.
                               161

-------
                   The mean and standa.rd deviation of these paired

sample lead determinations are presented below, for both the value and

their natural logarithm transformations.  Because the blood lead


                               Los Angeles           Lancaster
                             First     Second     First     Second
                             Sample    Sample     Sample    Sample

Number of Samples          99        99         97        97

Original Values, |ag/ 100ml
Mean
Standard Deviation
Ln Transformation,
In ((Jig/ 100 ml)
Mean
Standard Deviation
16.45
9.80
2.652
0.539
14.22
5.29
2.582
0.400
10.71
4.68
2.262
0.506
9.96
4.45
2.212
0.414
determinations have a skewed distribution, t tests utilizing the natural

logarithm transformed values should be employed to test for bias between

the first and second sample lead determinations.  Since the sample

determinations are paired, the paired comparison t test is the most

powerful for detecting shifts in the distribution.  The two-sided paired

comparison t test of the logarithmically transformed blood lead

determinations shows no significant difference  in means between the  first

sample and the second sample,  neither for Los Angeles (t  = 1.17;

P = .25) nor for  Lancaster (t =  1.00; P =  . 32).  While the preponderance

of the high Los Angeles blood lead determinations occurred on the first

sample, the statistical analysis of the pcdred samples  discloses no

significant differences between the first sample determinations and the


                                162

-------
second sample determinations, neither in their overall distribution nor



in their location.  There is no detectable bias between the first sample



and the second sample determinations.



                   210
             e.       Pb Analysis

                   210
                      Pb has been used as a tracer to determine the



sources of lead present in people.       Terhaar and Aronow    '



selected children with elevated blood leads that were known to have



consumed leaded paint and compared them with children with low blood



leads without exposure to leaded paint.  They examined urine and feces


                                       210
samples from these children for Pb and    Pb.  Their study was



designed to determine whether or not lead from dust was contributing to



the body burdens of lead in the children that were eating leaded paint.


210
   Pb is very low in paint chips  (0.005-0.07 p Ci/g),  much higher in



airborne particulate (60-150 p Ci/g) and also high in dusts  (3-30 p Ci/g).



                  F.rom these data, it would appear that the following



probably would occur in  different situations.



                                   Blood            Feces
                                        210             210
       Major Sources of Lead    Pb        Pb     Pb      Pb
       Paint                     high    low      high   low

       Dust                      high    high     high   high

       Air                       high    high     low    low

       Low lead exposure

         (dietary only)            low     low      low    low
                   Reports in the literature have not demonstrated all



of these relationships, especially with respect to blood.  In this project,



                               163

-------
samples of blood and feces were collected from children at the UCLA



site,  along with particulate air and soil samples, for ^*^Pb analysis.



The objective was to obtain additional information relative to  the sources



of lead at this site.



                   Airborne particulate samples yielded the following



results:



             Los Angeles - UCLA site 1.  137 p Ci/g

                           UCLA site Z.  157 p Ci/g




                   These values are similar to those reported for



urban airborne particulate (60-150 pCi/g).



                   The ratio of 21QPb to 208Pb (stable) in the air



particulate matter collected at Los Angeles (UCLA site) is:



                       740
                   pCi     Pb =  3. 012 average
                   mg



                   Applying this ratio to a 10-ml blood sample containing



approximately 40|ag of stable lead per 100ml of blood, there would be


           210                                                 21°
0.012 p Ci    Pb present.  The detection limit of the method for    Pb



was 0.045 p Ci  (average) for total blood sample, and the detection limit



for lOg feces (dry wt. ) was 0 . 05 p Ci/g.


                                                                210
                   Only one of the 30 blood samples analyzed for    Pb



was positive. The blood sample had 18.7|ig of stable lead per 100ml  of


                            210
whole blood, and 1.6pCi of   Pb/lOml of blood was found.  The other



blood samples were less than the detection limit.  Of the thirty feces



samples examined three had detectable  levels.
                                164

-------
                   These values were:
                   pCi/g

                   0.18
                   0.026
                   0.040
            stable Pb Mg/g (wet)

                2.22

                1.21
A value of 0.044 pCi/g has been reported by TerHaar and Aronow as a
normal fecal
             210
Pb value.
The data for soil samples are as follows:

                        210
Sample Identification
           Pb-pCi/g (dry wt.)    Stable Pb [qg/g (drywt.)
100 ft

20 ft.

100 ft

300 ft

. west of freeway

east of freeway

. east of freeway

. east of freeway

1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
0.66
0.86
1.09
0.96
1.22
0.99
0.57
0.74
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
58
96
3490
3775
824
522
165
302
                   The results from these analysis are ID t as useful as

was expected because the detection limits obtained were not sufficiently

low.  The air particulate samples and soil data are similar to those

reported elsewhere.  The fecal values are low, as was expected, but the

data for blood are not useful because the sensitivity was not good enough.

A high average for blood would have been 0.012 p Ci per 10ml, but the

detection limit of the method was only 0.045 pCi per 10ml.
                               165

-------
                   More information is needed on this type of measurement




to prove its usefulness in defining the sources of lead.  It has been





shown by TerHaar  and Aronow that the measurements will differentiate




in children grith high blood and high fecal leads as to consumption of





lead primarily from paint or soils.  Its usefulness has not been




demonstrated for airborne lead.







B.     Mining






       1.    Environment
             Air, water (from streams and ponds) and soil samples were




collected in an around the mining and ore processing facilities located




in Sudbury, Ontario.  Most of these samples did not produce measurable




responses  with AA.  Table  34 shows the air data.  The precious metals




area is located within the ore processing part of the plant, and this area




includes the final step performed by this plant on platinum and palladium




concentrates.  Measureable levels were found in  surface  soil samples




located in two areas around the plant.







                                      Soil
                                  Pt          Pd
             Vermillion Mine     0.8 ppb     4.5 * ppb



             Copper Cliff        0.8 ppb     2.0* ppb



             * limit of detection 0 . 7 ppb





             Water samples were negative for platinum and palladium,




and the detection limits are as follows:  platinum 0.05 ppb, palladium




0.015 ppb.





                                166

-------
Table 34.   Platinum and Palladium Concentrations in Air Samples
           at the Sudbury Mine
Location within the Mine     Metal Concentration,

Engineering Building
South Mine
Precious Metals Area
Furnace Room
Platinum Palladium
a a
a a
0.377 0.291
a a
    a.      Below detection limit of 0.003 ,ug/m
                              167

-------
       i.    Study Participants




             As mentioned earlier in this report 49 male employees




in mining and ore processing at Sudbury were sampled twice for blood,




urine, and feces. A sample of short and long hair was also collected.




These samples were examined for content of platinum and palladium, and




no detectable levels were found.   The detection limits for these types of




samples were given in Table 5.







       3.    Autopsy Cases




             A total of nine male autopsy cases were collected in Sudbury




from  individuals  that had been previously employed by the mining and ore




processing plants in this area.  Table 35 shows information collected on




these cases.  Samples of liver, kidney,  spleen, lung, muscle and fat were




collected from each autopsy.  In all but the following samples, there




were  no  detectable levels of platinum and palladium.




             Sample ID           Pt




             A d  20-75 - fat       4.5 ppb




             A 100-75 - lung     3.7 ppb




             A 114-75 - muscle   25.0 ppb









C.     Refineries
       1.    Environment
             In one of the refineries (sa,mples collected and analyzed by




the company),  it was reported that 42 a:ir samples were collected in 15




different locations within the plant over a 9-month period.  The values




                               168

-------
            TABLE 35.   AUTOPSY CASES - SUDBURY
Sample
  ID

A 52-75

A 59-75

A 70-75

A 73-75

A99-75

A 100-75

A 106-75

A 114-75

A 120-75
Age

50

60

55

73

61

52

47

22

51
Sex

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M
 Smoking
 History      	Cause of Death	

Unknown       Skull fracture

Yes            Coronary infraction

Unknown       Coronary thrombosis

Unknown       Coronary thombosis

Unknown       Myocardial infraction

Unknown       Ischemic heart

Yes            Coronary thrombosis

Yes            Automobile accident

Yes            Pulmonary edema/ischemia
                               169

-------
for platinum and palladium were very low and in all cases were within


the prescribed OSHA standards as set forth in the Federal Register,


Vol. 36, No.  157, dated August 31, 1971.


             In the other refinery,   the  samples were collected by the


company but analyzed by this laboratory.


             The working  environment of the refinery was characterized


through 24-hour ambient air samples collected for five consecutive work


days in the refinery and salts sections of the plant.  The platinum  and


palladium concentration determinations obtained in the air sampling are


presented in Table 36.  Note the relatively high palladium air


determination obtained on  Monday in the  refinery work section.  This air

                                                              o
sample, whose palladium concentration was at least 0.356 |j.g/m ,


probably represents a valid palladium determination.  However, because


of the possibility of contamination, the statistics  for the refinery area


palladium data set were calculated both including and excluding the Monday


sample. Table 36 shows weekly average platinum concentrations of


           33                                            3
0.159 |o.g/m and 0.180 |j.g/m  and palladium concentrations of 0.085 |ag/m

               3
and 0.028 |ag/m   , respectively,  in the refinery and salts sections.


Without the Monday sample,  0.017 was the weekly average palladium


concentration in the refinery section. In general, the platinum concentration


appears to have been higher  than the palladium concentration in the air


inside this refinery.  However, all the measured ambient air levels of


platinum and palladium were well below the OSHA standards.
                               170

-------
0
CO
0 d
r-j

|S
0
Iz;

0
x:
1 1

P
cd

CO OO
0 S
rH \
CX hO
B a.
cd
00 •>
d
^ 0
•H -H
< P
>> cd
d £H ?H
•H 0 -P
d d
W -H 0
d CM O
00 d
•H K O
P O
cd w
C 1 1
M < 1 1 1
p cd cd
d -p P
00 0
oS S
d
o w
o d
o
S -H
d o
•H 0
US £H
cd P-i
O




S
^3
-H
T^J
cd
rH
rH
cd
PL.




CO -H
P 4^>
rH O
Cd 0
CO 00


t— LC\ C<~) CO \O CO OO
LA rH O ^- rH CM CM
O O O O O O O
..... . .
OOOOO LPvO O




k>i
?H d
0 O
d -H
•H P
CM O
0 0
K 00


cd \ * \ *
\O OO CO OO LT\ l>- OOCO
LTNrHO^T *COrHLPlrH
OOOOO ^3-OOrHO
... \ . . . .
OOOOX! LPvOOOO





d











S
d
G
H
40
cd
H
PL.




rH
O
CO -H
P P
rH 0
cd 0
CO 00


00 rH CM CO in O rH
OO rH CO U3 O CO OO
H CM rH rH CM rH O
..... . .
OOOOO LPvO O









>> d
?H O
0 -H
d -P
•H 0
 00
K





OO O O\ rH rH OA 1>-
. — I -^T LP\ \O CM LP\ C^
rH CM CM H 0 rH O
..... . .
OOOOO LPiO 0

rH
cd
P-. CO
d
13 O
d -H
cd P
cd
S d
d -H
d S d
•H !H CO O
-P 0 O -H
Cti P -H -P
rH 0 P CO Cd
PH Q CO 0 -H
•H rH >
PH -P O, 0
0 cd S Q
. r—t >j p Cd
xO D< Oj >j CO CO TJi
rO E >> T3 Cd ^
o)J>3O)corc3>5>3tM cd
0 COcdrd0COCdrHO T3
rH TdCOdPn'O^ dd
xi £-.d0rc5dvH0'Cdcti
cd -HOd0X!?H0O0P
EH 
0
0 x!
P 4J
cd
S £
•H 0
P rH
co 0
H CQ


.
cd X!
















































0
rH
O
e
cd
co

>j
cd
Tl5
rj;
O
2

0
X!
p

M
d
•H
f^j
^S
H
O

H



*
171

-------
       2.    Study Participants




             One of the refineries examined 17 of their employees




(substantially all of whom by the nature of their work were involved in




operations associated with the chemical processing of platinum and




palladium) for platinum and  palladium in urine and blood  samples.  No




platinum or palladium was found.  The detection limits given (by the




refinery) were 60 ppb for platinum and 20 ppb for  palladium.




             Samples of blood and urine were collected from 61 refinery




workers by the other refinery and analyzed  in this laboratory.  The




levels of platinum and palladium in blood were below the  detection limits




(1.4 ppb platinum and 0.4 ppb palladium).




             Six of the 58 urine samples obtained  and analyzed had




platinum concentrations above the detection limit of 0.10 (a.g/1.  These




six determinations which ranged from 0.23  (ag/1 to 2.58 (j.g/1 are presented




in Table 37.  It is noteworthy that each  urine sample with a detectable




platinum concentration also  had a palladium level  above 1.0 p.g/1.  The




workers with detectable platinum levels were not confined to any




particular, work section within the refinery.




             Thirty-four of  the 58 workers  submitting urine samples had




urine palladium concentrations above the 0.21 fig/I detection limit.  The




sample determinations are presented by refinery work section in Table 38.




The mean and standard deviation of the palladium  determinations for




each work  section and for the total refinery are  also shown in Table 38.




The mean palladium urine concentration was 1.07 (j.g/1; the maximum
                                172

-------
  Table 37.   Platinum Concentrations in Urine Samples from
              the Six New Jersey Refinery Workers with Detectable
              Platinum Levels
       Urine Platinum          Worker's          Corresponding
       Concentration           Work              Urine Palladium
       jug/1 _          Section           Concentration,
       0.23                    Maintenance       1.59

       0.49                    Refinery          2.93

       0.66                    Refinery          1.05

       1.22                    Salts             2.42

       1.24                    Salts             6.27

       2.58                    Storeroom         7-4l
Notes:
       The urine samples of 58 refinery workers were analyzed for
       platinum.

       The minimum detectable urine platinum concentration was
       0.10 pg/l.
                                173

-------
TABLE 38.    NEW JERSEY RE-FINERY WORKER URINE
   PALLADIUM CONCENTRATIONS CLASSIFICATION
           '   BY REFINERY WORK SECTION
                       Urine Palladium Concentration,
Refinery Work Section
Refinery Salts
Sample
Determinations: a a
2.12 5.91
0.81 a
0.35 a
1.01 a
a 1.21
1.05 0.95
a a
2.93 2.12
a 6.27
a 0.63
0.31






Statistics:
No. of Samples 12 11
Mean 0.80 1.68
Std. Dev. 0.88 2.28
Recovery
0.13
a
0.31
a
0.28
0.36
6.67
0.27
a
0.11 -
a
0.25
Q_
a
a
1.3*
0.77
a
0.62
a

20
0.68
1.11
Maintenance
0.77
2.83
0.28
a
a
a
1.59
0.17
0.60
3.09
1.66
0.16







12
1.03
1.03
Storeroom Refinery
Total
a
7.11
a
















3 58
2.61 1.07
1.16 1.68
  Below minimum detectable  urine palladium concentration of 0.21 jug/1
                                174

-------
determination was 7.41  |ag/l.  The urine samples were collected overnight


Monday and returned on Tuesday.  Despite the high air palladium


concentration in the refinery section on Monday,  Table 38 does not


indicate any obvious relationship between a worker's work area and his


urine palladium concentration.


             The  original urine palladium data presented in Table 38


and their natural logarithm transformations have been examined with


respect to  the normality of their distribution. The logarithmically


transformed data, having a mean of -0.67 and a standard deviation  of


1.09 over all 58 observations, is much less skewed.  The assumption


that this logarithmically transformed data has a normal distribution


appears to be warranted.


             A one-way analysis of variance by refinery work section


was conducted on the natural log transformed urine palladium concentration


data.   Table 39 presents the mean  and standard deviation of the natural


log transformed data in each refinery work section.  The logarithmic


transformation does tend to equalize  the urine palladium variability


within each work section.  Table 39 also contains the analysis of variance


by work section.   There was  no significant difference in the mean


urine palladium concentration among the workers in the five refinery


work  sections (F = 0.991 < F   (4,53) = 2.55).  In fact, there is just as
                            .05

much urine palladium variability among the workers within a  single  work


section as between workers in different work sections.
                               175

-------










0
£
•H
PH
^~~)

0
E
PH
O
CM
CO
C
cd
PH
EH

>3
rH •
<-( C
cd O
0 -H
•H -P
6 O
X! 0
-P CO
•H
PH -S
Cd PH
bD 0
O 3=
>S
CM PH
O 0
C
0 i-l
O CM
C 0
cditd
•i—J
•r-1
PH >j
cd £1
[>
co
CM C
O O
•H
CO -P
•H Cd
CO PH
>3 -P
rH C
cd 0
C o
o
>3 O
cd
3= E
1 3
0 -H
£3 T3
O cd
rH
0 rH
x; cd
EH PM


c>
CO

0
rH
X)
Cti
EH

















C
O
•H
-P
O
0
CO

^
PH
0
3=

>j
PH
0
C
•H
CM
0
pr|


















E
o
o
0
JL,
O
-p
CO
0
o
fj
cd
C
0
•p
C
i
* »f~1
cd
S



C — VD
on o
. .
O CAJ
on I






on H
•=r o
CM O rH
rH 1







>j
PH
0
>
O
0
0
K


CM vr>
o 00
* •
O rH O
CM 1








CO
^J)
rH
cd
co
on U3
on on
• .
rH 0 rH
rH 1



PH
0
C
•H
CM
0
K


O CO
t — O^
• •
CM O O
rH 1




1
CO PH
0 O
!p CO
co C
•H Cd
-P PH
Cd EH
4_5
CO bO
O
E J
3
•H rH
r) cd
Cd PH
H 3
cd cd
O-i %Z «
a
0 PH O
C 0 -H
•H T3 -P
PH C Cd
>— ^ *- ^ r^







C
0
•H
-P
cd
•H
>
0 0
N Q
. 1
•n
CO T3
PH
0 Cd
rH t3
a c c
6 cd cd
cd 0 -p
co S co
w
o
Bn
O

CO
H
CO
         o
        •H
        -P
         cd
        K
         0
         PH
         cd

         cr
        CO

         C
         cd
         0
        N
        Ql
         co
         0
         PH
         cd

         D1
        CO

        CM
         O

         a

        CO
              I>-
                   03
                   rH
                    rH
                    on
                         LPi
              o
in
t—
as
o
co
LPv
                         MD
                                  LO
                                  in
                                  on
                                  in
                                   in
                                   o

                                  fo
to
C
O
•H
-P
O
0
CO

C
0
0
13
-P
0
CQ

03
G
O
•H
4->
O
a>
C/}

C
•H
x;
4->
•rl
3:











rH
cd
-P
o
EH
-P
C
cd
o
•H
CM
•H
C
hO
•H
CO

-P
O
^
*
          176

-------
             Correlation analysis was used to explore any relationship




of the urine palladium determinations to the available social and




occupational variables.  Table 40 presents the results of the correlation




analysis of the logarithmically-transformed urine palladium determinations




with the age, race,  cigarette smoking,  length of employment,  work




section, and work shift or the refinery worker participants.  The




correlation analysis shown in Table 40 was conducted both for all 58




workers with analyzed urine  samples and for the 34 workers with




detectable urine palladium levels. There are no significant correlations




of urine palladium with any of these six factors for either worker data




set.  The variability in the workers' urine palladium concentrations




cannot be explained in terms  of the available social and occupational




factors.
                               177

-------
nificant
relation?
PH
0
C
•H
CM
0
K
CM
O
CO
C
0
•H •
-P CO
cti PH
PH 0
-P -P
G 0
0 Cti
O fTi
G
0 rH
0 Cti
•H
T) O
Cti O
0 CO
>_3
T3
0 G
G CO
•H
PH < — 1
^ Cti
G
id O
0 -H
S -P
PH Cti
o a
CM 3
CO O
G 0
cti O
PH
EH CO
1 3
bO 0
O -H
J M
Cti
CM >
O
.C
G -P
O -H
•H £
-P
Cti CO
H PH
0 0
PH ^SH
PH PH
O O
0 S



•
O
^f

0
rH
J3
cti
EH
60 PH
•H 0
CO O

o o o o o o
^ 2 S 3 S S





0
rH
cti
!>

PH


o
LA OO O UA 0 O
-3- rH LP» LTi LA
. A • •
A A A



PH
f\
G -P
0 G
•H 0
-P -H
CO O
rH -H
0 OH
PH CM
PH 0
0 0
O 0







rH O\ CM UD OO OO
O C— OA O CM CM
rH rH O O O O
. • . . . .
O O O O O O
I 1 1




CM
O

PH
0 CO
o PH
S-H
3 cti
S OH







OO CO OO CO OO OO
LH LT\ LA LA LA LA


-P
0 <•_, £
-P O0
-P bO S C
PH
O
-P
O
cti
fc
0 G ,G >s O
PH -H 43 O -H -P
0 Cti^ bOrH ^-P ^CH
0 O bOO CO, PnO Pn'H
bO Cti -HE 06 O0 O.G
•cj Pi OCO i-5H 3sco I3CO






T3 CO
0 0
CO ISI rH
PH >j CU
0 rH 6
X Cti Cti

£H
0
jsj
PH -P
O 0
s co
PH G CO
0 <
[3 0
& G
H -P >H
rH -H PH
<£ S t>

po o o o o o









O O O CM O O
LA LA CM CM LA LA
. . . . .
A ^ fi A










CM rH
VO rH CM t— H O^
CD O CM H OO t>-
O CM O O
CD • O
1 O 1 O O O











~r -=d" -^- -=r ^3- ^j-
ro no oo oo oo oo


43
0 «w C
jj 00
-P bO S G
0 G ,G >» O
JH -H -P O -H -P
0 cti ^ bOrH ^ -p ^ Cn
CD 0 bOO GO. PnO Pn-H
bO Cti -HS 0S O0 O.G
 -H
r-1 -H CO 0 PH
<; 3: PH J *b
178

-------
                            References
 1.     Johnson, D.  E. ,  Tillery,  J. B.  and Prevost, R. J. ,
       Trace metals in occupationally and nonoccupationally exposed
       individuals, Environ.  Health Persp. , 10, 151-158(1975).

 2.     Bowen,  H. J. M.  Trace Elements in Biochemistry,
       Academic Press,  New York, 1966, p.  197.

 3.     Yoakum, A.  M. , Stewart, P.  L.  and Sterrett, J. E.
       Method  development and subsequent survey analysis of biological
       tissues  for platinum, lead, and manganese content, Environ.
       Health Persp. , 10, 85(1975).

 4.     LeRoy,  A. F.  Interactions  of platinum metals and their
       complexes in biological systems, Environ. Health  Persp. ,
       10, 73(1975).

 5.     Bumgarner,  J. and Yoakum, A.  M. A  critical review of
       analytical methods for the determination of platinum and
       palladium in biological tissues.  In-house technical report,
       Bioenvironmental Laboratory Branch,  National Environmental
       Research Center, Research Triangle Park, N.  C. ,
       September 10,  1973.

 6.     Aggett,  J.  and West,  T. S.  Atomic absorption and fluorescence
       spectroscopy with a carbon filament atom reservoir.  Determination
       of gold by atomic fluorescence and atomic absorption spectroscopy
       with an  unenclosed atom reservoir, Anal. Chim. Acta. , 55,
       349(1971).                                              ~

 7.     L'vov, B. -V.  The potentialities of the graphite crucible method
       in atomic absorption spectroscopy, Spectrochim. Acta.  24B,
       53(1969).                                               ~

 8.     Mulford, C.  E.  Solvent extraction techniques  for atomic
       absorption spectroscopy, Atomic Abs. Newslett. ,  5, 88(1966).

 9.     Adriaenssens,  E.  and Knoop,  P. A study of the optimal conditions
       for flameless atomic absorption  spectrometry  of iridium,  platinum
       and rhodium, Anal.  Chim. Acta., 68, 37(1973).

10.     Guerin, B. D.  The determination of the noble  metals by atomic
       absorption spectrophotometry with the carbon-rod furnace,
       J_. S. Afr.  Chem.  Inst. , 15, 230(1972).

11.     Janouskova,  J. , Nehasilova, M. and Sychra, V. The determination
       of platinum with the HGA-70 graphite furnace,  Atomic Abs.
       Newslett., 12, 161(1973).
                               179

-------
12.    Khattak, M.  A. and Magee, R. J.  Spectrophotometric determination
       of platinum after extraction of the stannous-chloro complex by
       high molecular weight amines,  Talanta, 12, 733(1965).

13.    Khattak, M.  A. and Magee, R. J.  Spectrophotometric
       determination  of palladium after extraction of the chloro-stannous
       complex by tri-n-octylamine,  Anal. China.  Acta. ,  35, 17(1966).

14.    De, A.  K. , Khopkar, S.  M. and Chambers, R. A.  Solvent
       Extraction of Metals, Van Nostrand Reinhold,  London, 1970,  p. 23.

15.    Davidson,  C. M. and Jameson, R.  F.  Complexes formed
       between the platinum metals and halide ion.  I.  Extraction of
       hydrohalic acids by solutions of Amberlite LA-2 in carbon
       tetrachloride,  Trans. Faraday Soc. , 59, 2845(1963).

16.    Davidson,  C. M. and Jameson, R.  F.  Complexes formed between
       the platinum metals and halide  ions.  II. Extraction of haloplatinates
       by solutions  of salts  in Amberlite LA-2 in carbon tetrachloride
       and in cyclohexane, ibid. ,  61,  133(1965).

17.    Hwang, J. Y. , Ullucci, P. A.  and  Mokeler, C.  J.  Direct
       flameless atomic absorption determination  of lead  in blood,
       Anal. Chem. ,  45,  795(1973).

18.    Mitchell, D. G. , Ryan, F. J. andAldous,  K.  M.  The precise
       determination  of lead in whole blood by solvent extraction-atomic
       absorption spectrometry, Atomic Abs.  Newslett. ,  11, 120(1972).

19.    Kubasik,  N.  P. and Volosin, M.  T.  A simplified determination
       of urinary cadmium, lead, and thallium, with use of carbon rod
       atomization and atomic absorption  spectrophotometry, Clin.
       Chem. ,  19,  954(1973).

20.    Hammer, D. I. , Finklea, J. F. , Hendricks, R. H. ,  Hinners,
       T. A. ,  Riggan, W. B. and Shy, C. M.   Trace metals in human
       hair as a simple epidemiologic monitor of environmental
       exposure,, Trace Substances in Environmental Health-V.  1972.
       A symposium,  D.  D. Hemphill, Ed. , University of Missouri,
       Columbia.

21.    Rantala, R.  T. T.  and Loring, D.  H.   New low-cost Teflon
       decomposition vessel, Atomic Abs. Newslett. ,  12,  97(1973).
                               180

-------
22.    Smith, R. G.  and Windom, H. L.  Analytical handbook for the
       determination of arsenic,  cadmium,  cobalt,  copper,  iron, lead,
       manganese, mercury, nickel, silver and zinc in the marine and
       estuarine environments.  Technical report series number 72-6,
       Georgia Marine Science Center, University System of Georgia,
       Skidaway Island, Georgia.

23.    Dr. Joseph  Bumgarner, EPA, Research Triangle Park, N. C. ,
       personal correspondence.

24.    Dixon, W.  J.  Analysis of Extreme Values, Annals of Mathematical
       Statistics,  21, 488-506(1950).
       — ...-..—-..   	  f***

25.    Snedecor, G.  W. and Cochran, W. G.  Statistical Methods,
       6th ed. ,  The Iowa State University Press,  1967,  p 86.

26.    Fisher, R.  A.  Biometrika, 10, 507(1915).

27.    TerHaar, G. and Aronow, R. ,  New information on lead in diet
       and dust as  related to the childhood lead problem, Environ.
       Health Persp. 7, 83 (1974).
                               181

-------
                 APPENDIX A

INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS FROM
          LOS ANGELES AND LANCASTER
                       182

-------
                     i^t **r m  rn m m m yi  m ru  fi ffi ^ 3^ yn  rrt if\  yn if)  ui */v  IP j> tf* tn n^ un i/t  1/1 ut *fi  un tf^ to  */* 1/1  u*i IP  t/t UTI 1/1  i/i IP  f*i ru
                     oc^ccootnooaoooocfccocc oaotfioc. ooooooc.ccoooocco-t    i/>
                     OOCOTtoOCOCOOC'C^OOOOOCCOCrOOCCOOOC'CCCOOOOOOCOO     —»
                     orv-^o—.cr—iooooooooofv»Hiocro*voorC'— cooo     ac-^ocoaor^c-crn     ao
                     ru nj ru  'V    ru.ru     ru     ru -* ru ru     ru     rti     ru     —t ••« ru    fu    oj     ru     ru fu ru     ru  ru --r        ru  -HI ^-i     ru
                                                 ry	^Jn^TTJJV    . ru  .   rw     ^     fu r\j m    r*i	  n^.,.^... fyj     ru •-< ru_ 	fr?..r^.ru_rr*,   ru  *u ru
                                   — *\i ru__.«•*  *V ^t,ry /U-A* f\i —»  ru ^JM "^  ft  —*  ru ru,__fu, -74 CU  *~* fJu  •
                     ^'nCi ru m W-« *^ -i  ^mfijruriicu^.  ^V^-^^. ^  ^'m m ^'^  *
                                                                                                                                                                     ry
                                   rv  c:-  c^ CD  c'"-*  —» j? -I-  rv tv" «-»"m  »  x  ru x  x *th ~aT m rr  -»• rr  jr/  CD rv rv r»i  u I'l »"  i"
                            -^  — .-^  *-*  iDJ*1 .rn rn jt _-a. rs.'T>. fi» <*> .CLELUbC..^ r\<  ru ru, yp. JB.*P  'V fu.^-?*_fy JV,*^ °  m P -°- G
                            ff\  tf  u*t  in  ^- *•  & rv  3>-  f« ^t  ^ ^  y^ v«r ^i  yi  ji fv  fv rv. 3^  3^ ^-  fv fv  ^  ^i \jp
                     o —^ •"  ••* •"""  ™^  O r*!  *n ru  —•) —•* —H  */i ru c ru  fU  -•*  •*+ &•  rn ru fu  o "4  * 3^  ^n  m *
                     •*HI 3)- f*  —t —HI  —i  ru rx>  ru ru  ru —^ —^  —•* ru * *"• *  cu  ru r\)  rx ru ru  ru ru  ru ru  ru  ru ru
                                             cr                      r*.           x  m —  -*    —*            —<     FV ao
                                             rt                      *x           mrururui/i            ru     -*4 —*
                         ifi                  —*     «•  c            *rv        rucrxxaotr        crxx
                         ru                  ru     —-  ru            — —*                          m     ru  r»"            nj m
                                                                                                                                         x  J-
                                                                                                                                     . fc rn  nn..
                                                                                                          1JfiJ)|v»vu^  --txirvfv rv

                                                                                                           ru —•* ru ^^ —HI  —^ rn     •—* ru  ru *•  ru fu
                                             ru     *•*—^rufurvru-*1!
                                             —»     ru  -HI ru ru  r\* --  —t  i
                                                                                     i  ru <
                                                                                                                             i f\j     ru ru ru nj  AJ ru
                                                                                                                             i fu     rv oj ru —-4  f\j 'V

* *
o c:
o tr
   o

a c
ru -HI  ji  i/i ui  u*i  .
           O C  C  O  O —*     O

           O O  O O  O C'
           x in  x  x  *  c-     x
           O —*  O  O  -H| -4     O
                                                                         c     ooo     -^c
                                                                         tj>     — • o  r*i     — m <
                                                                         x
                                                                         O
                                                                                              OOOO-^OO— i-HiOO
                                                                                   c>  o c
                                                                                   -HI  C  —»

                                                                                   cr  o cr
                                                                                   o  —t a
                     •n m  ft rn  *»i m r*i
                     ru  -t -• -• —) -^ r\j
                     /u oj  fu ru  *\i ru
                                                                          i  ft} m fn ffi  r^ r*i  fn m  f> f!  fi r*i m i*» f*>  rn rn i
              <7/ 'm  »  ui J  »v an
                     o  c  o o  c o
                                                                                                    urtar ao  -HJ -4 ru —* -^ -^
                                                                                                                            -^—«^^*-^-ruru—«-^
                                                                                                                            j-arr^rtiTi^H^Hg'g'
                                                                                                                            ^^rum»i/iJ>P-tt»cr
                     »»»»»*»»*•»»»»»»»*•»*•**•»»»*•*»»»»»»»-**:
                     OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC'OOO
                                                                                                                            *•»»»*»»:
                                                                                                                            O G O O  C? O O  I
DC
U
m
                     oootc:  o»*i
                                                                                                                                                    rn rn rn
                                                                                                                               OOO*ICOl/lC.O
                                                                                                                               oocT'Oco'wcrc
                                                                                                                               CT~ oooocr* oc1
                                                                                                                            ru nj        —« -^     rtj    ru
                                                                                                                                         ..--,-     ru    ^
                                                                                                                                  •^ ^ fu ru •*<  ru ^4 ru
 I)
 U
       -•     rv

—# —* ru"^i'/C "-H~^"ru"^"ru" -^Tru RJ -H ^T7u~ru ru ~+ ru  ^^
ru
o
                                                              ru
                                                              O
                                                              o
                                                              tr
                                                                                      O
                                                                                      o
                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                                                                                         J3
                                                                                                                                                c
                                                                                                                                                o
                                                                                                                                                                               cr
                                                                                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                           00000000000000000000
O O  O U1  C
c o  o »  o
O C  O D  O
   ru         ru
i  o c,  in 1/1
•  o -H  o o
OO
OO
OC.
OC'
C'CO
OOO
                                                              ClO
                                                              OO
                                                                               DC'
                                                                               OO
                                                                                                           OJHOOOOOC.OOOOOOCOOOOO
                                                                                                           OOOC'OOOOOOOOOOOOO    DO

                                         *^ ru  ru x  j rn  m ••« ^ •^ m eu «ii  ru at  ry i\i rui  »
                                      —< ru f  s>- i/> \J ^.  06 cf t* —< cv **> *  ui x >*• c? ••* T
                                                                    ru  ru rw W iti  1i ru

                                         occooooooooooooocooooooooocoaooooooooooo
                                                                                             183

-------
                 in                                                                                            ininin«*tf)inm
                 oooooommt/ioaoGinGooooGDoooooooooocorttooooo.oo
                 oooaoooruruoooooooccofuoooc ocoooooooooooooo o
                 ooooof^ooooooooooooooao-Hcorvooo 000-^00—4^000 o
                                                                      ru            ru ru ru   ru       ru         fu      ru
                                            ALjrU*Lffl^ 'V'Xi       OL   .  ..     JO./U.-^.  fU
                                                                                                            -H -^ fU -H -^ *U —* -4
                                               xrviinxf^xxinxmininm m

                 ooooooaooooooooc?ooooooooooooooooooooooc?oo
K

|A|

MI
•H
111
H
to

o
z
<
                 OOO-^OOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOCaOOOfUOOOOCOOCiC
                       u  fti -rg* w*-* m^-  * ^-j- ^  ~--r** •**-**» ^i J^^ y-^-^i ^ v« y^i >• M ui
                       *  nj CD if» c T «-T^ ft *  AJ f^ OD »  "i *• ^-"in *u * f*- m r\j 1/1 m — » or mrU"4C~*b
                                                                                                             fu cr t  arcr or^r q~
 ODOOOO  O
•ooooaoo
                                     OOOOOOOOOO OOO-l^
                                     ooooooooooooooo
                                                                              oooooooooooooooooooo
«*«r»
oo
oo
   •**
oo
oo
ofM
ocoo
oooo
oo-HO
ni^wa*
                      otn
                      oo
                      OO
tflo
oo
oo
                                                     1/1    IP * * *    * ui in in in *n    01 un m in in t/»
                                     oinutaifi oouiooootfiooai/iooooooookA
                                     ooooooooooooooooaooooooooru
                                     ooa^ooooooooooooooooooof-cro
                                                        ai         ^-^nj    rxirxjru    ru       ruai    ru
                                                                                                                                in
                                                                                                                             fcA ao
                                                                                                                             ooo
        OO    OOOOOOCTOD
ru x    OAJ    Jtru-^oo-^4ni\itnf**
oo    oc:    ccoo-^o^o-^
J3 a?    trt^    j^^xji^jtjjx
OC?    OO    O-*OOOOOOO
                    O    OOO
                    o    -^ ru OD
                    D    o-^o
                    in    cxx
                    O    -^ C O
                                                                   Od
                                                                   — * 01
                                                                   cc
                                                                   -JD -c
                                                                   OO
                                                                                                  OOOOOOOO    OOO
                                                                                                  Joir/^ru^^-^m    o -* tr
                                                                                                  ooo-«oooo    -*oo
                                                                                                  xxxxxxcrx    xxx
                                                                                                  OCOOOOOC1    OO-4
                 OOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
                •oooooooooooeoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooQ
                                                                     184

-------
               APPENDIX  B
DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE TO ANALYZE
     VACUTAINER CONTAMINATION STUDY
                      185

-------
       A 95% Confidence interval around a true mean value, |i,  is



given by:





       X- (1.96) (^-) < v.  <_ X + (1.96)  (-^=r)



where



             X   =    sample mean



              
-------
               APPENDIX  C
INDIVIDUAL LEAD VALUES FOR PARTICIPANTS
    FROM LOS ANGELES AND LANCASTER
                      187

-------
Los Angeles,  California
         188

-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  201
  207
  208
  209
  210
  211
  212
  213
  214
  215
  216
  217
  218
  220
  221
  222
  223
  224
  225
  226
  227
  230
  231
  232
  233
  234
  235
  237
  240
  241
  242
  243
  244
  245
  246
  247
  248
  249
  250
  251
  252
                               Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              p.g/100 ml whole blood
Sample No. 1
14.67
10.33
13.12
25.50
11.54
9.03
23.75
20.35
18.92
34.98
18.24
9.92
22.35
27.92
14.93
12.35
17.22
19.98
13.50
9.03 •
9.76
24.96
39.92
11.87
8.49
13.51
21.08
12.53
7.44
16.26
20.31
21.22
16.95
21.28
19.57
20.94
16.12
15.43
17.84
Sample No . 2

19.91
9.25
29.02
10.34
13.65
3.63
7.30
21.76
12.35
8.18
7.37
11.06
	
20.41
18.12
	
	
	
12.85
	
	
	
5.47
7.87
28.40
9.02
19.14
5.65
19.62
8.21
_ _ _
	
	
12.51
20.69
15.95
16.07
20.22
                           189

-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA.
Sample I.D.

  253
  254
  255
  256
  257
  258
  259
  260
  265
  266
  267
  268
  269
  270
  271
  272
  273
  274
  275
  276
  277
  278
  279
  280
  281
  282
  283
  285
  286
  287
  288
 289
 290
 291
 297
 298
 302
 303
 304
 305
 306
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              |ig/100 ml whole blood
Sample No. 1
30.12
- 42.39
15.97
18.46
11.33
10.45
22.06
13.50
14.61
19.34
27.16
38.45
11.37
12.45
23.70
33.37
9.25 .
49.41
58.83
16.73
11.83
15.36
49.36
20.78
18.34
12.24
23.92
31.13
6.67
27.41
36.58
5.89
• 26.56
32.57
7.07
23.15
Sample No. 2
20.88
•V «* M
12.54
	
3.63
8.25
25.28
16.71
_ __
12.71
12.35
13.25
8.60
20.57
___
11.77
— _ _
— _ _
20.18
16.03
13.09
13.07
19.51
13.53
14.99
9.07
-__
_ __
14.49
11.00
15.04
10.45
15.40
14.99
18.02
10.23
                           190

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.
Sample I.D.

  307
  309
  310
  311
  312
  313
  400
  401
  402
  403
  404
  405
  406
  407
  408
  410
  411
  412
  413
  414
  415
  416
  417
  418
  419
  420
  421
  422
  423
  424
  425
  426
  427
  428
  430
  431
  432
  433
  434
  435
  436
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              ^jig/IPO ml whole blood
Sample No. 1
16.47
9.88
9.25
9.89
33.78
15.96
11.43
40.79
9.88
14.33
8.67
4.75
10.21
15.84
29.57
16.66
5.77
11.12
11.49 -
11.03
5.11
9.31
8.09
21.55
12.47 - '
15.93
22.12
5.13
12.00
6.40
16.94
9.58
23.92
7.76
9.21
8.99
15.39
4.95
8.40
6.79
Sample No . 2
	
10.27
8.53
10.87
15.07
27.08
	
17.73
14.58
11.40
15.74
16.88
	
18.77
13.08
19.03
8.06
13.09
12.75
8.98
10.32
15.80
	
11.31
<1.50
19.38
13.66
11.16
11.26
9.14
7.75
19.97
26.04
14.39
16.61
10.01
16.58
17.35
11.76
12.11
                           191

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                             Hg/100 ml whole blood	

Sample I.D.               Sample No. 1     Sample  No. 2

  437                         7.25            22.28
  438                         8.91            10.37
  439                        13.12
  440                        18.70
  441
  442                        10.87             9.35
  443                        <1.50    -- r    <1.50
  444                        25.41             	
  445                         9.21            14.23
  446                        12.90            10.34
  447                        12.39            15.18
  448                        13.13            20.90
  449                        15.31            19.25
                           192

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA '
                             Feces-Lead Raw Data
                               p.g/g wet weight
Sample I.D.

  201
  207
  208
  209
  210
  211
  212
  213
  214
  215
  216
  217
  218
  219
  220
  221
  222
  223
  224
  225
  226
  227
  230
  231
  232
  233
  234
  235
  239
  240
  241
  242
  243
  244
  245
  246
  247
  248
  249
  250
  251
  252
Sample No. 1
•M »
--
0.01
1.70
0.83
0.65
0.71
1.00
0.62
0.48
0.08
-_
0.24
1.20
0.69
0.62
2.11
0.30
0.41
--
0.23
0.29
--
0.30
__
0.19
0.29
--
0.52
0.23
0.17
2.07
0.46
__
0.53
1.54
--
0.37
--
0.20
1.99
193
Sample No . 2
0.54
0.28
0.58
3.31
1.78
0.42
0.81
0.80
2.04
0.29
1.18
0.97
0.41
3.83
2.62
3.57
-_
__
1.17
0.86
0.14
0.01
0.65
0.29
0.18
0.30
1.48
10.19
0.51
0.38
0.23
--
0.61
0.76
1.61
0.65
0.73
0.83
0.17
0.61



-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA  '
                             Feees-Lead Raw Data
                            	|j.g/g wet weight	
Sample I.D.               Sample No.  1      Sample No. 2

   253                       4.71              1.48
                                              5.40
   254                       1.98              2.37
   255                       0.53              2.22
   256                       0.31              0.41
   257
   258
   259                       0.25              0.19
   260                       0.91              1.08
   265                        __                1.21
   266                        --                o.84
   267                       0.40              1.09
   268                       0.22              0.11
   269                        -                o.56
   270                       0.00              0.05
   271                       1.62              0.84
   272
   273                       0.62              1.15
   274                       0.77
   275                       0.65              0.85
   276
   277
   278                        --                1,22
   279                       0.42               1_
   280                       0.81
   281                       1.64               l.OO
   282                        --                2.40
   283                       1.69
   285                        -                o.26
   286                       1.54
  287                       0.10               0.37
  288                        --                i.5i
  289                       0.30                '—
  290                       0.61               0.22
  291                        -                o.29
  297                       0.60               1.84
  298                       0.47               0.73
  302                      0.42               0.48
  303
  304                      3.22               1.56
                         194

-------
              LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA '
                            Feces-Lead Raw Data
                                      weight
Sample I.D.

   305
   306
   307
   309
   310
   311
   312
   313
   400
   401
   402
   403
   404
   405
   406
   407
   408
   410
   411
   412
   413
   414
   415
   416
   417
   418
   419
   420

   421
   422
   423
   424
   425
   426
   427
   428
   430
  431
  432
Sample No. 1
0.90
0.57
0.41
0.14
0.98
0.48
0.30
0.48
__
_ _
0.53
0.60
--
2.49
0.69
0.47
0.48
0.27
0.29
0.33
--
0.64
0.64
--
0.30
0.54
0.15

0.36
0.79
0.58
0.64
0.66
0.37
0.49
0.28
0.42
--
0.38
195
Sample No . 2
1.40
0.56
0.87
0.78
1.02
0.16
0.97
0.41
0.77
1.10
0.01
0.18
1.20
1.32
0.70
0.55
0.58
0.71
0.17
0.02
0.21
--
0.52
0.01
0.79
0.28
0.11
0.87
0.10
0.37
0.56
1.09
0.48
0.65
0.47
0.59
--
0.27
0.77


-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA  '
                             Fece;s-Lead Raw Data
                                   wet weight
Sample I.D.               Sample No.  1      Sample No. 2
   433                       --               0.85
   434                      0.93              0.55
   435                      0.30              0.30
   436                      0.53              0.31
   437                      0.70              0.84
   438                      1.21              0.76
   439
   440                      0.83              1.41
   441
   442                      0.46
   443                      0.96
   444
   445
   446                      0.24
   447                       --               0.08
   448                       --               0.80
   449                      0.91
                          196

-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA
                             Hair-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D,

   201
   207
   208
   209
   210
   211
   212

   213
   214
   215
   216
   217
   218
   219
   220
   221
   222
   223
   224
   225
   226
   227
   230
   231
   232
   233
   234
   235
   239
   240

   241
   242
   243
   244
Short
26
12
4
-
14
24
5

6
_
_
23
37
_
101
28
-
136
47
155
79
54
52
82
35
50
23
6
45
_

13
308


12
_

Hair
.67
.05
. 32
-
.47
.66
.74

.49
_
_
. 34
.29
_
. 37
. 15
-
.47
. 75 •
. 52
.49
.86
. 10
. 32
. 39
.21
.03
.20
.63
_

.26
.59


. 58
_

Long
11
27
4
124
-
14
7
3
2
14
73
-
_
72
38
-
27
-
-
-
-
-
54
71
42
-
37
5
21
148
157
31
280
271
378
17
180
169
Hair
. 51
. 52
. 54
.49
-
. 31
.45
. 62
.83
.30
.63
-
_
. 34
.05
-
.63
-
-
-
-
-
.25
.33
. 30
-
.39
.92
.71
. 14
. 19
.98
. 34
.89
.74
. 77
. 87
. 10
                                            199. 01

                          197

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                            Hair-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.

  245

  246
  247
  248
  249

  250
  251
  252
  253
  254
  255
  256
  257
  258
  259
  260
  265
  266
  267
  268
  269
  270
  271
  272
  273
  274
  275
  276
  277
  278
  279
  280
  281
  282
  283
  285
  286                        --              146.71
                          198
Short Hair


38.30
26.17
44.01
89.89
145.37
109.14
69.49
--
9.03
--
62.77
14.27
25.91
—
7.61
<0.70
33.16
63.84
37.00
—
3.08
8.97
22.72
41.99
71.24
310.10
80.23
--
275.41
408.16
68.90
51.78
, 21.98
53.68
50.89
42.09
Long Hair
120.36
137.32
51.34
22.99
40.84
130.03
103.03
88.91
>
33.90
18.61
47.65
59.36
—
27.65
73.44
21.17
3.24
25.35
61.03
48.63
9.33
6.36
13.19
3.63
14.17
--
—
—
100.54
__
_ —
85.24
77.62
20.55
50.86
39.32
__

-------
              LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                            Hair-Lead Raw Data
                                 t^g/g
Sample I.D.

  287
  288
  289
  290
  291
  297
  298
  302
  303
  304
  305

  306
  307
  309
  '310
  311
  312
  313
  400
  401
  402

  403
  404
  405
  406
  407
  408
  410
  411
  412
  413
  414
  415
  416
  417
Short Hair

151.37
36.55
—
- -
31.46
—
32.06
58.99
18.80
43.15

—
—
56.87
8.33
28.10
- -
49.61 •

—
- _

- _
—
—
--
100.76
—
104.00
133.44
--
8.79
—
--
--
3.82
86.67
Long Hair
43.78
148.67
55.33
9.44
40.23
19.47
57.50
22.75
46.85 -
13.01
21.72
22.55
14.30
112.15
68.48
7.90
6.64
65.61
17.20
28.66
45.48
177.27
225.60
80.94
31.00
30.63
22.92
72.31
22.88
29.80
8.35
9.37
3.74
23.25
12.36
31.20
86.67
99.12
                          199

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                             Hair-Lead Raw Data
Sample I. D,

   418
   419
   420
   421
   422
   423
   424
   425
   426
   427
   428
   430
   431
   432
   433
   434
   435
   436
   437
   438
   439
   440
   441
   442
   443
   444
   445
   446
   447
   448
   449
Short Hair
26.49
—
—
—
14. 97
3U08
30.98
<0. 70
28.89
14. 12
85.47
79.81

27.02
88. 00
14. 34
10. 23
10.96
29. 74
21. 64 '
--
—
114.07
48. 39
—
51.00
8.35
37. 17
--
107.33

Long Hair
17. 18
28.03
59.63
14.31
—
19.38
5.30
1.27
13. 51
5.08
—
4.51
9.48
29.08
46.49
13.95
6.37
7.69
7.48
41.40
'97.84
72. 10
154.40
22.97
80. 14
35.46
1.76
12.23
18. 62
94.94
121. 15
                          200

-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA
                              Urine-Lead Raw Data
                                    H-gA
Sample I.D.

  201
  207
  208
  209
  210
  211
  212
  213
  214
  215
  216
  217
  218
  220
  221
  222
  223
  224
  225
  226
  227
  230
  231
  232
  233
  234
 235
 239
 240
 241
 242
 243
 244
 245
 246
 247
 248
 249
 250
Sample No. 1
14.3
2.7
7.2
8.3
13.5
13.1
5.4
5.7
10.9
23.0
18.7
37.5
5.4
4.4
10.3
2.7
2.7
11.4
22.1
6.6
2.1
5.0
26.3
19.7
33.7
5.2
33.2


25.9
33.7
11.6
4.7
3.3
12.5
18.8
11.0
19.7
25.1
14.1
24.4
<0.6
201
Sample No . 2
8.8
3.9
10.7

5.8
3.9
17.4
11.4
6.9
37.6
8.5
5.0
—
5.6
6.6
7.2
7.6
9.0
18.0
14.8
5.4
--
15.1
--
17.8
19.4
12.2
11.3
8.4
5.2
22.9
34.9
15.5
5.5
14.0
13.5
9.2
35.0
12.7
9.0
11.6
__


-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                             Urine-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.

  251
  252
  253
  254
  255
  256
  257
  258
  259
  260
  265

  266
  267
  268
  269
  270
  271
  272
  273
  274
  275

  276
  277
  278
  279
  280
  281
  282
 283
 285
 286
 287
 288
 289
 290
 291
 297
 298
 302
Sample No. 1
15.6
31.7
77.4
3.2
9.6
13.0
32.4
„ _
1.7
7.7
35.2

9.8
11.6
4.5
9.3
7.3
26.2
17.0
2.1
38.7 '
--

9.6
34.3
18. 2
39.7
6.7
2.3
4.6
25.7
--
3.2
4.7
6.6
10.8
6.3
13. Z
6.Z
2.Z
3.6
Sample No . 2
11.7
15.3
19.3
10.7
9.9
7.8
16.6
25.2
11.2
.6.4
10.1
11.3
6.8
6.1
3.6
2.4
21.8
25.7
14.1
20.9
~ _
18.6
13.2
29.7
18.3
22.6

-------
               LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
                             Urine-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.

  303
  304
  305
  306
  307
  309
  310
  311
  312

  313
  400
  401
  402
  403
  404
  405
  406
  407
  408
  410
  411
  412
  413
  414
  415

 416
 417
 418
 419
 420
 421
 422
 423
 424
 425
 426
 427
 428
 430
 431
Sample No. i
<0.6
30.1
25.8
2.6
7.7
_ _
36.2
7.4
10.7
11.6
20.9
6.6
21.4
25.3
27.5
3.7
2.7
5.9
20.0
15.3
7.9
15.2
11.6
6.8
11.6
13.7

0.7
12.5
13.0
7.2
3.3
12.6
22.0
14.3
24.5
18.2
12.3
16.8
25.5
4.3
26.7
Sample No. 2
6.0
18.5
10.2
8.5
14.1
13.1
6.3
1.6
6.5

8.0
6.9 8,
14.0
22.3
4.0
10.2
4.7
13.3
12.2
18.0
11.2
3.6
10.6
2.4
6.0
9.2
10.4
3.6
4.4
17.6
10.7
11.9
10.0
7.3
4.9
5.7
13.6
14.8
16.9
19.5
19.5
13.4
                          203

-------
               LOS ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA
                             Urine-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.              Sample No.  1      Sample No. 2

  432                        <0.6              12.1
  433                         10.8              18.3
  434                         12.3               8.0
  435                          --                9.6
  436                          7.6              16.0
  437                          --                4.7
  438                         17.6              14.1
  439                         44.7              15.1
  440                          9.3              17.8
  441                         76.0              23.8
  442                          3.4              24.5
  443                          5.2              21.8
  444                         13.5              14.1
  445                          9.8              17.8
  446                          5.2               4.1
  447                          -                4.9
  448                         18.6              13.1
  449                         17.9              27.3
                          204

-------
Lancaster, California
         205

-------
                LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA^
Sample I.D.

  001
  002
  006
  007
  008
  010
  Oil
  01Z
  013
  014
  016
  023
  028
  029
  030
  031
  034
  036
  038
  043
  044
  045
  046
  052
  053
  054
  055
  056
  057
  058
  063
  064
  066
  067
  068
  069
  070
  071
  072
  073
  074
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              |j.g/AGO ml whole blood
Sample No. 1
13.65
10.73
7.73
___
.14.75
10.17
12.31
16.34
15.39
4.62
13.89
5.98
8.85
6.40
7.38
16.34
12.46
13.46
8.01
4,35.
14.04
14. 61
6.43
17.56
9.03
8.16
11.12
12.74
10.74
9.16
8.23
10.32
<1.50
5.47
9.45
8.98
12.31
15.48
8.87
21.28
8.14
Sample No. 2
8.24
___
6.63
24.43
13.69
9.97
11.57
8.27
5.97
15.56
5.78
9.19
9.09
9.31
10.46
6.81
6.92
12.80
9.73
5.61
___
12.45
4.93
___
13.68
13.14
5.68
8.12
7.01
7.62
5.59
8.59
3.01
8.66
8.05
7.20
10.04
6.54
11.29
	
7.20
                          206

-------
                LANCASTER,  CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D,

  075
  079
  080
  081
  083
  084
  085
  087
  088
  089
  090
  091
  094
  096
  097
  098
  099
  100
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110
  111
  112
  114
  115
  116
  118
  119
  120
  121
  124
  125
  126
  127
  128
  129
  130
  131
  132
  133
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              [j.g/100 ml whole blood
Sample No. 1
13.40
12.45
7.88
7.32
9.16
9.16
6.75
<1.50
16.96
15.61
16.97
9.63
15.90
14.84
5.00
8.26
10.49
9.18
11.12
6.97
8.27
21.29
6.09
14.11
21.76
24.17
15.03
14.23
12.29
8.71
3.28
5.44
17.49
5.01
15.63
9.12
9.03
8.51
4.65
12.52
10.01
Sample No. 2
16.44
3.84
8.17
9.30
9.95
8.15
9.09
5.49
12.62
6.60
9.66
7.35
16.82
5.34
14.89
8.87
14.53
14.53
7.10
5.15
14.65
20.18
4.85
8.43
25.34
24.86
5.73
8.91
	
6.73
6.92
11.10
24.38
4.76
12.37
7.01
	
	
7.92
13.25
10.89
                           207

-------
                LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.
                              Blood-Lead Raw Data
                              lag/400 ml whole blood
  134
  139
  140
  141
  142
  143
  144
  145
  146
  147
  149
  150
  151
  152
  153
  154
  155
  160
  163
  164
  165
  167
  168
  169
  170
  171
  172
  173
  174
  175
 450
 451
 452
 453
 454                         8.51
 455                         7.94
 456                         9.87
Sample No. 1
11.95
18.47
13.48
10.85
9.93
13.39
5.91
8.31
13.70
12.07
7.51
5.14
4.22
7.96
19.94
5.82
17.96
12.19
12.19
9.42
5.55 •
9.46
8.88
11.71
5.53
	
11.59
6.69
6.69
18.47
18.86
7.56
6.40
5.91
Sample No. 2
12.77
7.15
__ _
7.21
11.35
r <1.50
12.45
	
6.47
12.19
12.25
6.01
8.05
-__
10.77
4.45
12.66
12.69
7.29
9.92
8.89
	
___
___
	
10.78
13.33
9.85
6.35
20.70
18.38
- -_
_ — _
8.13
                           208

-------
               LANCASTER,  CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

   001
   002
   006
   007
   008
   010
   Oil
   012
   013
   014
   016
   023
   028
   029
   030
   031
   034
   035
   036
   038
   043
   044
   045
   046
   050
   052
   053

   054
   055
   056
   057
   058
   063
   064
   066

   067
   068
   069
                             Feees-Lead Raw Data
                               fig/g wet weight
Sample No. 1
0.37
0.29
0.22
0.59
0.70
1.29
1.10
0.86
0.96
0.33
2.14
5.07
0.95
0.65
5.41
--
0.95
2.06
0.96
--
0.40
1.22
1.30
1.53
4.02
0.44

0.81
1.16
2.54
0.92
3.63
0.39
0.46
- 0.64

1.51
1.27
__
Sample No . 2
0.35
0.49
0.11
1.60
0.54
1.08
__
0.44
0.73
0.60
1.94
0.69
1.17
0.59
2.38
2.13
2.18
_ _
--
0.77
0.02
1.91
1.67
0.74
II
0,61
0.32
0.44
0.67
0.25
1.65
1.49
0.29
0.82
0.35
0.26
2.61
0.52
0.48
                          209

-------
               LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  070
  071
  072
  073
  074
  075
  076
  079
  080
  081
  083
  084
  085

  087
  088
  089
  090
  091
  094
  096
  097
  098
  099
  100
  101
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110

  111
  112
  114
  115
  116
  118
  119
                            Feces-Lead Raw Data
                               Hg/g wet weight
Sample No. 1
<1.50
0.86
0.44
1.58
1.78
0.24
0.31
0.58
0.72
1.08
0.85
0.64
0.88

1.40
2.65
2.02
1.18
3.14
0.29
2.06
--
1.11
1.57
0.42
2.48
2.38
2.04

0.94
1.44
1.18
0.67
0.86
1.01
Sample No. 2
0.36
1.09

0.97
3.50
0.43
0.32
•. _
_ —
0.51
1.28
2.56
0.31
0.13
3.78
4.29
1.38
1.19
1.66
0.43
1.68
0.33
1.38
0.33
0.36
3.09
2.85
0.46
0.53
0.56
2.63
0.75
1.40
0.47
0.66
                         210

-------
               LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  120
  121
  124
  125
  126
  127
  128
  129
  130
  131
  132
  133
  134
  139
  140
  141
  142
  143
  144
  145
  146
  147
  149
  150
  151
  152
  153
  154
  155
  160
  163
  164
  165
  167

  168
  169
  170
  171
  172
  173
                             Feces-Lead Raw Data
                                (j.g/g wet weight
Sample No. 1
0.99
1.49
1.27
3.47
0.37
3.04
2.67
1.31
1.12
2.28
2.82
2.10
3.94
1.42
0.42
0.60
0.73
1.38
0.09
0.04
0.67
1.17
2.29
0.84
1.24
1.26
0.80
0.33
0.84
3.71
1.23
1.16

1.14
0.45
1.10
--
0.56
0.78
Sample No . 2
1.30
1.46
— *.
1.46
— —
3.45
0.58
0.94
1.07
1.42
1.30
1.58
1.79
0.54
— _
0.42
0.47
0.06
0.50
0.16
0.93
0.63
2.00
1.09
1.32
0.67
1.24
1.11
1.16
--
0.91
0.33
0.22
0.92
0.15
--
0.44
0.57
0.84
                         211

-------
               LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
                             Feces-Lead Raw Data
                          	|jig/g wet weight	

Sample I.D.               Sample No. 1     Sample No. 2

  174                       0.40               1.03
  175                       0.20
  450                       0.20               0.00
  451                       1.04
  452                       1.10
  453
  454                       0.45
  455                        --                 0.68
  456
                         212

-------
               LANCASTER,  CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  001
  OOZ
  006
  007
  008
  010
  Oil
  012
  013
  014
  016
  017
  023
  028
  029
  030
  031

  034
  035
  036
  038

  043
  044

  045

  046

  050
  052
  053
  054
  055

  056
  057
                              Hair-Lead Raw Data
Short Hair

2.71
2.95
13.64
13.59
10.37
<0.70
6.69
15.11
--
8.29
20.78
22.94
9.42
9.25
--
10.06
8.37
43.34 •
14.98
--
3.57
3.48
<0.70
7.98
11.69
5.80
8.14
4.93
5.03
--
—
41.39
--
43.51

--
16.27
Long Hair
14.91
13.05
3.90
9.83
2.77
—
20.05
9.07
11.43
3.39
1.75
—
23.60
4.48
13.35
12.16
7.61

16.12
--
7.76
7.12

—
14.78

13.35

2.61

4.01
44.40
42.78
14.38
98.76
121.48
9.08
12.87
                          213

-------
               LANCASTER,  CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  063
  064
  066
  067
  068
  069
  070
  071
  072

  073
  074
  075

  079
  080
  081
  083
  084
  085
  087
  088
  089
  090
  091
  094
  096
  097
  098
  099
  100
  101
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110
                             Hair-Lead Raw Data
                                    f^g/g
Short Hair
4.00
14.33
14.10
27.01
7.20
14.34
7.88
3.78
4.51
13.08
13.36
2.21
1.76
—
5.78
7.51
--
2.83
4.88
4.10
16.47
12.92
1.12
__
24 . 93
20.39
24.58
26.75
—
--
--
--
5.83
4.20
9.48
5.09
7.11
—
Long Hair
10.27
15.79
29.08
6.21
<0.70
9.14
13.60
4.22

22.82
9.86
3.10

53.45
7.31
9.75
4.71
5.33
13.84

12.26
7.33
15.99
13.22
24.19
5.01
34.06
22.53
28.02
28.65
17.06
3.57
16.61
6.42
9.88
—
17.84
15.47
                          214

-------
               LANCASTER,  CALIFORNIA
                             Hair-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.

   Ill
   112
   114
   115

   116
   118
   119
   120
   121
   124
   125
   126
   127
   128
   129
   130
   131

   132

   133
   134
   139
   140
   141
   142
   143
   144
   145
   146

   147
   149
   150
   151
   152
   153
   154
Short Hair
5.93
27.51
— _

12.28
4.23
19.51
24.14
—
47.85
56.41
16.32
19.88
—
—
45.80
2.54



--
46.79
19.87
7.40
22.67
40.57
9.78
942.00
764. 00
819. 00
--
7.92
13.45
—
22.23
10.31
10.76

Long Hair
5.99
39.61
2.70
-JQ.70
12.51
2.42
27.12
24.48
24.68
16.63
--
8.37
10.17
27.84
34.35
--
<0.70
4.81
0.94
<0.70
6.63
108.52
18.29
4.27
14.07
42.51
9.49
131. 35
3826. 80

312.07
8.59
6.46
15.45
28.25
25.58
3.91
3.33
                          215

-------
                LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

   155
   160
   163
   164
   165
   167
   168
   169
   170

   171
   172
   173
   174
   175
   450
   451
   452
   453
   454
   455
   456
                              Hair-Lead Raw Data
Short Hair
20.89
11. 95
29.06
27.68
16.46


6. 90
--
16. 11
8.69
12. 67
11. 37
22. 59

--
20.20
--
--
14.01
31. 19

5. 96
9.31
Long Hair
50. 78
9.01
42. 65
14. 36
5.08
2. 67
3. 80
3. 71
33.49
—
8. 33

24.03
15.22
7.78
<0.70
11. 73
4660. 70
19. 14
16. 39
39.40
13. 50
7.94
10.24
                           216

-------
                LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
Sample I.D.

  001
  002
  006
  007
  008
  010
  Oil
  012
  013
  014
  016
  023
  028
  029
  030
  031
  034
  036
  038
  043
  044
  045
  046
  052
  053
  054
  055
  056
  057
  058
  063
  064
  066
  067
  068
  069
  070

  071
  072
  073
                               Urine-Lead Raw Data
                                      M; A
Sample No. 1
17.0
7.4
	
46.8
1.3
20.0
2.5
	
20.4
5.3
12.8
1.4
	
5.9
8.5
11.5
9.2
4.1
10.0
6.0
8.3
14.0
20.0
18.5
13.5
3.6
19.5
4.7
9.7
8.8
6.6
5.7
2.3
4.1
6.0
1.4
5.6

11.3
12.5
21.3
Sample No . 2
9.1
12.7
8.5
28.9
5.6
8.8
27.3
2.1
6.3
<0.6
8.5
3.5
9.8
5.0
3.6
7.0
4.8
4.4
<0.6
5.2
10.1
--
4.4
14.0
1.6
<0.6
12.4
1.4
8.9
11.0
0.8
<0.6
<0.6
2.5
4.3
1.2
5.3
6.5
--
4.8
11.9
                           217

-------
               LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
                             Urine-Lead Raw Data
Sample I.D.
  074
  075
  079
  080
  081
  083
  084
  085
  087
  088
  089
  090
  091
  094
  096
  097
  098
  099
  100
  106
  107
  108
  109
  110
  111
  HZ
  114
  115
  116
  118
  119
  1ZO
  121
  124
  125
  126
  127
  128
  129
  130
  131
  132
  133
  134
Sample No. 1
9.5
0.8
14.4
6.8
5.8
20.7
9.0
7.0
9.7
19.4
32.4
9.7
5.9
22.1
26.5
_ __
6.6
10.4
12.4
2.3 .
4.8
19.9
5.7
11.0
13.1
13.8
6.3
6.8
16.7
3.0
10.4
7.0
<0.6
4.6
3.6
9.6
10.3
3.5
7.5
3.7
32.5
<0.6
30.5
6.5
218
Sample No . 2
7.3
2.9
11.5
2.0
19.7
9.9
12.1
<0.6
1.0
11.7
209.2
5.3
7.0
4.7
16.2
9.9
—
<0.6
8.7
37.2
7.8
<0.6
6.3
6.6
3.2
10.2
5.9
6.3
19.1
3.0
3.3
4.7
6.3
2.9
2.3
<0.6
3.3
11.0
16.4
11.2
0.8
2.3
9.1
<0.6


-------
                LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA
                              Urine-Lead Raw Data
Sample No. 1
12.0
21.0
11.7
13.1
7.8
<0.6
27.7
9.2

17.3
6.8
31.5
33.5
2.7
4.7
11.6
7.7
12.9
11.0
<0.6
7.4
5.9
26.0
7.4
__
11.6
4.9
2.0
20.8
12.2
13.6
12.9
6.4
2.5
Sample No . 2
14.2
3.9
9.2
2.1
0.7
2.1
7.5
8.7
12.1
10.2
1.7
14.5
19.0
4.6
5.3
14.7
4.2
14.5
9.8
2.9
2.5
<0.6
9.3
5.5
8.2
9.3
3.2
1.7
<0.6
6.8
8.6
- -
—
_ _
Sample I.D.

  139
  140
  141
  142
  143
  144
  145
  146
  147
  149
  150
  151
  152
  153
  154
  155
  160
  163
  164
  165
  167
  168
  169
  170
  171
  172
  173
  174
  175
  451
  452
  453
  454
  455
  456                          7.0
  450                         12.3
  060                         --                  3.7
                          219

-------
  APPENDIX D
THE LABELING CODE
         220

-------
                    The Label Code (15 Characters)
 lolumns
 .-4
   Variable
Format
        Valid Codes
Human subjects         4N
identification number
           Location code          4AN
           Soil Location Code     4AN
           Water Location Code    4AN
           Sewage Location Code   4AN
           Sample medium
                       IAN
           Sample analysis
                       IAN
7-*
Site
2AN
Four digit ID number taken
from subject's question-
naire

Location of air or dust
samples

S is the first character;
columns 2-4 are sequential
numbers

W is the first character;
columns 2-4 are sequential
numbers.

R is the first character;
columns 2-4 are sequential
numbers.

A - Air sample
B - Blood Sample
D - Dust Sample
F - Feces Sample
H - Hair sample (out from scalp)
I - Inner Hair Sample
      (close to scalp)
R - Raw sewage sample
S - Soil sample
T - Throat swab sample
U - Urine sample
W - Water sample
Z - Sputum sample
1 - Abdominal fat sample
      (umbilical area)
2 - Psoas muscle sample
3 - Liver (right lobe)
4 - Pancreas (tail)
5 - Kidney cortex

(blank) - General (Collection)
A - antibodies
B - bacteria
H - mercury
M - trace metals
P - parasites
V - viruses

Site identifying code
CH - Chicago
LA - Los Angeles
LC - Lancaster, California
NJ - New Jersey
                                   221

-------
Columns
     Variable
                                  Format
       Valid  Codes
10
11
           Sampling period
Sampling sub-
subperiod (Air,
and dust samples)
12-15      Project number
                       IN
Sampling subperlod     IN
(day) (Site samples)
or sample number
(human subject
 samples)
                                  IN
                                  4N
                                              1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
(blank),  1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
                                   3881, 4005, 4007, etc.
                                   222

-------
E
o
U.
1
_)
CD
a.
|
1
t
QB
£

1

E

'c
D
c
1
~J
I
X
lladium I
1 CD Cadmium PD Pa
O
S
-
LU
<
f
n
1
O
u
xf
3
in
u
a
T* (O
in tn
in
CU Copper PT Platinum
HC Hematocrits SG Specific Gravity
HG Mercury ZN Zinc
cc
z
—t
u.
CO
O9
3.
«o
1
0
in
Q
x.
O
u
?
A
o
H-
CL
«1
I
a
g
n
1
O
_ "N 1 ' " ' t
r,/n >'"" \
Analysts 6 |
tn
vt
7,
>
n
Analysis 4
Analysis 3 ]
rsi
£
in
>•
Analysts 1
i"Tl
D
~n
>
12
imn
V
3
•s
>
H
nun
0>
3
ra
>
,H
i!un
w
3
E 0
^•8
>iun
S
E -s
J?-8
nun
S
>
IB
nun pjepueis

^
5
2
Sample
Medium


1*1
D t> —



u
»
1

jequjnN
loelo-id
pouadqns qn$
# ajdujes/jadqns
pOU9Cl &Ul|ClUJI'S
apoQ ans
«i*A|piip mdujiKj
umip.uu «i|f]iiirc;
Q!
j
:
'•


i'
;'
;j
S
r~~
0
g
S
r-
0
10
5
in
O
S
ID
ry
tD
to


S
ITJ
S
in
5
n
m
ft

s
s
S
p*
•»
•£>
If)
^-
5
S
(N
V
»
§
R
S
n
s
in
n
S
n
fM
D
n
s
S
tN
p-
CN
U>
(N
in
rr
n
PW
IN
(N
fM
O
CM
O
00
r*
(D
U)
w
n
^
-
o
en
00
-
(£>
tn
•7
p.
-f
-r -r -
	 	












































































. 	

























































i

































































































._ .
















































































—











































































_















































































-- - 4 	










































































	








































































	
--•

























































































































































-,
---
1 	









































































































































































































































	














































































	













































































	

-


~^~



































































































































































































































—











































































































































































































































	











































































223

-------
       APPENDIX E
ANALYSIS VARIABLES IN LEAD
              224

-------
                                             a. oc    » if*   r*. OD IT
                                              • •a    oo -<   rs. ae -t
                                             o a.
                                             Z :3    cr
                                             ifri       (^ .-4   y ,/\ fri o    fW  fv ^ ^ f^ ^j> ^f  M* or

                                             O       tf **   OD » Ifl **•    *ODJl.^r*-rvo»fll/»
                                                                                                 O f^
                                             az    i/im   ovnim   «ruia>mera-o»— laom
                                             OcO    -» "   -• -u --< J>   nj»cr<--.r^tvoD»m^i^r>j*Dinopi
                                             n uj
                                                o
                                                      oo   at f a> m    »— tj>»»oi>ioapror«-fu
                                                      O-4   inr«-tft^-    iiir«-xorbi/ti/ioO'^^'(W
                                                      ODJ   *-*-r«-ff*-    rvi^^fvio^ir^-V'^^rv^
                                               .*-    'ir   -e o o ir    ocrr-cs^^-in-^ui^
                                              cat    ni*^   vir^i/ija    rvjru   «^^«^«u-^-^t\j-4
     aJ    O
     u.    _l
           <_>
           •-•
           X.
           I
           »-                     o
           —                     o
     ui    or •                    o


     a    o
     at
     O
         O    •->                          4               M-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXM
.1   .     •"•    *~                          arm            uibjuiuiuiuiuiuiikiuiuiutuiuiiuui
^   •-•-•>                          4               aincooi    0909 m co ia 09 « m o>a>
                                                             225

-------
              • •   DO    OOOO    OODOOOOOOOOO
             O.X    o a    oooo    oooooooooooo
              .«    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
             £ >•    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO


                      OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
             o a.
             2 :D    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
                o
             o       mm    » ji rri .B    j>rvr-or«.-«r«i.»./ioor>-ij»
             2       *  "*    *•»• X »• o
              •      rii/i    in ji nj *
             u.  m   rnm    fuxknrv
             aJK    fu •»    ir o J) -i
             O •*    mn    ni m rv »
             oz    *  o    -i » -« oc
             aro     K- OD
                      •mm    mnxain,
Z
C9
X
u
             co m                            • f*- »ji

             iU
             3
             _1
             «
                                                      •>• U lu          ui xl u<
                                                        hii*
                                  . I u.    Z.ZXU.U.IA.ZZZU.U.U.
                                  >          «O » « « 
-------
  • -   OO    ODOO    OOGOOOOOOOOO
O.OC    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
  »«»    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
Z»    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO

         OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO

  -_l
o a.
2O    OO    OOOO    OOOOOOOOOOOO
   o
         a*    A -< or*.    j
  .  -   » m    rr o -m»»iri
   a:    oti    iicoom    ir
Of    at m    r«i rv _o tr    rr)croo»-tar«-cr»MiMf
a o    co .n    ru » j> rr.    (rjoD-»-^mo-OJii^ai
<•-•    «ocr    jiinircD    ruruoDirirr>-coxj>n-ir<
Ot—    or^-    -^orrvrv    ao— «o»OD'^r«-xo^GD
IO tkl
   o
         o j    »-Hm
         Ji cr    -H cr oo i
O a.    ir i
Z 4
   a.
>•


ui
         co       coco          0>nIO«OCO«>CO
         •oz    axozz     a>C X X  X     XXXXXXXXXXXX
                                 t.i L^t i.i iaf i.i i«i i^t itii t«i t.i i.i HI

                                 ia en in co 10 - +-    »-^*-t-   »-•-»->->-»-•->-•-»-»->-


         toco    •» «o «o to   «o to co co co co «o to n «o •) •>
                              221

-------
           *•    .a —t o in    ru—•
                 !/).£*•.£    m Ol
         ruru    Kjrunjrxi    ~4ru
k»."    co-«    »  o ru m
a z    r>~ »    iwoar
cto    mir    -^t^
                                       O O IP ^ ff  O 4/1 *Xi
car     r«if\j    •nriirtP''    fU
           tf.   tu uj or or   uiiuuio>uuja:ac/>a>zzzzzz
                              i^l Ul Itl t.i t.l l|l Ul tl 1 t»l Ul i.t 4.4
                XXXX   XWXXMXXXXXXX
                              t*i ui t.i t.i 1^1 1^1 i.t u.1 E»I ui 1*1 t.i
                 nioaiio   toco«K>cacaa>«]
                           228

-------
a. at    r». r»    GDoercr
         CD -*    Oi O -4 rv
   3    -»-<    -4 o 1/1 .a
         co cr    m ist PI in      -*   -»
o       OD J»    isi GO o
u.   •   oo    000-4    mooooocroof^tKO
uac    oo    oooir    ooooooo»»-oo»-iro
O ««    OO    O O O JP    J>OOOOOmOClEBOOO
aco    M>H    »- co tn r-    r^^-t
                  X  U. X  U.   ZZZU.U.U.ZZZU.U.U.
         ujac    uiujocci:
                     O CO IO   COCO
         at z    cocozz    co coco co co to z z z z z z
   -*    O4.    OO-44    OOOOOO
«o
^^                              Ul U^UIUIUlLjJUJbJUIUJUJUJ
u en                           o cs o i»ts ts ts o o o o cj>
•->                              «-a-«<»-««-««^-a«««i
^->
10
•-•
a
u
•«                xxxx
Of ^             ^ ul i«t ^J    |^J UJ UJ Ui UJ UJ Ul kU UJ 1^ Ul Ul
«                co to co to
         UJUl    UJ1&JUJUJ   I*,* t*l ui i»i 1.1 t*t *
         »- t-    !—»-»-»-   »-»-»->-»-»-

         mm    m mm m   mmmmmmmmmmmm


                          Z29

-------
        APPENDIX  F
EFFECT OF ADDITIONAL FACTORS
    ON LEAD CONCENTRATION
              230

-------



















fl
o
•H
4->
IT!
(-1
4->
a
CO
u
a
O

•d
n)
CD
-H
ti
O

CO
!n
0
4->
U
rc)
JH
—i
rd
fl
0
•iH
4J
• H
T3
•a
<
'tH
0
•M
O
CD
4H
4H
1 •!
i|

















C
cd
(U
51
*H
T)
cd
CO
J
u
• rH
!H
4->
CU
CH
Vt
O
CD
a

•~z
CO
3
ex)
DH
• 
CO
ex)
y
fl
cd
j
hH

CQ
CU
i—4
CO
00
rt

CO
o
T
t — 1


CO
rt
i — i
CD
CQ
ex!
CQ

. — 1
crJ
-(->
H





CD
Tissu







CO
,—4
cu
>
CO
-1







iH
0
4->
U
cd
h

^H o o r~ o Tf
O O r-H Tf4 vO ^H
i-H •— 1 (M i—1 • — 1 i-H


in I-H PO o -rt< o
r^4 OO OO


vO Th (MO CM vO
O^ vD ' — i C^ I-H 0s
^H -H vo -HH oo in



r- I-H oo o m oo
,-H (M CM CM i-H i-H




— 4 sO 00 O CM — i OcMOO
• •• ••• •••
O 0s- "-"< t— i I-H psj xO f—1 CO
r-H^Hi— ( rMxOfSj r-H CO •— *



uO|>(M moOO -^irifO
•— t ^ (M LO •—« -^




i— i i_i JH
^ •- -s
C nJ ^
o EC E
-do +j
o ^H ?r oo M oc
o -~- S ^- ° ~^
-H 00 O oO XI 00
ft A. J rt. W A>


. t-.^ >-.,.
^ P P
L, M >H
(U co cu
m CO CO
^ r- % r- Jl r-
d ^H ^ .-H ^ — 4
2 M ^ M ^ M
MM"
+ CD + CD + cu
_._1rO _i_J'd _,_,rd
i— H r~^ f-t r~H i^^ j r-H i— -n ._|
oog ooH oog
oo3 oo3 oo3
XlXlcQ •^H'^CO ^Hi^CO
OU^ U"n U CJ n
COCO,n CQCOnj COCO^
CDCO^ CUCUri CDCOri
MViu ti !H 'Zj ^ ^l Z3
kPnO PnPnO PnPnO
00
fl
^_4
O

r!
i^-4
U
co

OO i-H
in c>
i-H


m CM
-*


m o
^ oo"
i — 1 i-H



r- -H
CM rM




oo m ro
• • •
m ^f o
i-H i — 1 i — 1



m r^ oo
rM vD






CO
ti -H
• H - — ^
i! ^
^ 2.


l^
f>>
h
CO
CO
b r-
p l^
* n
H
4- CD
_, _, 'd
r-H i-H ^
O O 5
0 0 D
xl xl m
00™
°5 m CU
CU CU JH
^4 )H 4^
PH PH O








CM O
o CM r— CM
* • • •
O I-H 00 O



in oo in r~
OO ^H

0 vO
o oo o oo
.—4 O -^ OO
i-H ^H



r^ o o CM
^H rM CM -^



(M O [^
o o o m o
* • • * •
O I-H — i oo (M
i—4 ~H



m r^ oo ^f o
.-H m oo in





o
o
CO t)
« oo o C
8 -Sb 2 gP
PM d, PQ ^


*-
,>>
M
CU
CQ
t! r-
3 ^H
Z n
M
4- a)
. . -d
i — 1 i-H _i
0 0 «
0 0 p
XI XI CQ
O O ...
to » cu
« H JH +j | |
PH PH O 0 rM
CU
*4H O
o d
CO
CO ^
»H .H
ed co
CD CO
>H aj

r— oo CM o
• • * •
O O oo (M
i-H i — 1 i — 1


oo in -o •*>
o •— i oo


—i Tf ^ O
• • • »
m CM r^ CM
I-H rM CM oo



xO 00 I-H O
^f CM ^ oo




rM o oo m
• • • •
^H 0s (NJ SO
•-H i-H (N] f— 1


0s ff^f ^— ^, (*}
CO rO r^ (M
,-H PO IT) .— 1





H
•r-l
rtf
EC
BP w>
fi -*^
0 bjQ
-1 A















,-H OO I
_l_ II*
^ O CM ^








231

-------

rH
in CD
fy -4^
CD w
S U
^ rd
rd ^
u
rH CO
•M CU
CD rH
£ "
M GuO
S rt
CO
,-C O
4-J
rt
cd
a
:2s
}_, ,—4
J fll
m
" nj
*o
EH


CD
CO
CO
.H
H
CO
CD
CD
1-1








rH
o
-4_3
u
rd

O O (M
0s ^t* in oo •— i i — i [-— . — i CT* CT^ oo xO t^- r^ r— < cr^ o^ oo oo o in
OOinr-H fMOOOO O-HO xO O O PJ CM CM T^if-HrH ON 00 00
r-H 1 	 1 I 	 1 i 	 1 r— 1 i 	 1 i — 1

•xt* CM oo in oo "xt* in o^ xo CM rH m rH xO r— i • — i xo > — ' CM • — i r—
I—H xO rH o^ I~H oo ^ r^- oo r^" CM ^-o '^ r^
oO C^ O
ooin •— i oo m ^Dsor^ •— 4 oo CM ^foo^ ^0010 r^cr-in
• •• ••• ••• ••• **a ••• •••
^4 id f*. QN OoO OOO in^O OOOMC) OOOO **D r— i i — i t^-
fMOOOO r— 1 r-H l— 1 rH rH CMOOl— ( OO^fM 1-Hr— 1

fMincr^ cr^or^ OfMoo in^fm ooom o^rnrM o^fin
CMOOfM (Min^f OO'f-^ CT^CM OOfM t~~rH •— 4 fM



^ CM ^
oO ^JH r^i in O vO ^O 00 00 O^ OO O T^4 p- C) vO r-n i — i r^- oO ^4
• •• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• •••
rH 00 '-O CT^ CO CT^ CO O CO Tf rH 0s Is- r*- 0\1 CM OO CM rH 0s 00
fNJCM. 	 1 r-H t — ll 	 1 fM 	 1 1—4 OO r— 1 I 	 1 r— 1

^o r*~r~ ^00^ in< — ifM f^ino o^ ^o ^c> o t^ oo o in CM
fM "^H 0s OO xD rH OO sO ' — ' O^ xO 00 00 in C^- OO OO xD ' — i xD OO
rH r— 1 t, H
'3 £ •" -d
ct) C ^ rd
ffi o ii >-H
 CD
rnao «,_! ^ao Or-H wiao rnao drn
O~-^ ••-< ^ u^> O' — S ~-^ O-~~ "H -^.
.cjao ^ao ^ao i~- ' ao Oao j^ao ^ao
wa^ ^^ f^a^ PQa, ^ A. v> &. ^a^
CD CD JJ CD
i — I . — I *""! i — I
.•H .H '^3 -H
a a s a
r-H r— \ •— •* i — 1
CQ1^ W'^J "3'Ji m'^
F-^H CO TrH ^ CO ^H ^ CO .H ^ CO .iH
1—1 ^ C "— ' ^! C •~(J»Jd r— i y r;
n^C ^St: J3rT!C -QSC
I— 1 CO I-HOO_^_' 	 IOO^_ _Q ^Q n _Q
11+ II II fM — ' fM — i (M •—< fM <— i
OcMJ'xt* OfXJ'xt1 OfM-xt* v^A vfM^ \^CMA s/fMA
a
° >>
- g
^ O CD S
o rt oS
0) ?4 M
CO rg 5 ^
»H .,H j« M
cd co co QJ
0) o> .H X
>H pcj Q W
r^- oo oo
in o^ 0s*
rH O O


(M O rH
oo r^
"xt1 O^ t^-
r^ m -xf4
• • •
OOO


^f oo in
O fM



in CM o^
r- oo oo
o" o' o"


xO CM xO
0s xO r^



CO
^ —•».
co GO
CD
r-H
a
r-H
CO ' <"
X CO ^
"^ Jsi c!
-Q rH G
CM ~° rH
v oxj A









232

-------

^ t. O vO ^ OJ M CT^
g 53 ... ...
™ ^_> O 0s (7s t** *" •* O
^ CO »—* t— H r-t r-H
S «)
U
ojni ^or^'* oooOrH
^j oof^m oooom
-1 "^
u
'C
+j^ ^oooo rHooin
D « 	
C7j ^foo-^ oor^o
^bjO rHrHrH OOOjO
v G
O <1 ^ —
^Q OOOOO OtJ^rH
^ ^ rH rH rH
-U
CJ
nj
'u <"
• 1-1 fl
«_. »—i ^ oo ^o r^ in ^r1
(^to oorHO^ in oo •— i
" CTJ ' — 1 rH OO ' — ' ' — '
«« PQ
o
. nj oo" — . ^^ ^<" *~. — .
OQ oOOvQ OOOOOO
rHr. ' — i^in rH^in
"g -^
v o E
3 TJ O
tO O rH 00 00
to o ~^. 5 ~^
•-*• ^oo o oo
r» r^-f fl^ >^H ^^
cu d^
m rH rH
-H '3 -d
> « a
CO ' « tO ' «J
r*! to ^5 ri
oo oo <~^ ^ ^* xO r*** to r**-
... ... ...
oooo rHoom ooo
OO 0s ' — ' rH rH OO
OO
-. ^,
OOvDrH rHOOOO OrHrH
00 I—Hi — 1 I 	 1 rH



rH OO OO
vomo m^j<^ oooooo
oomrH oo^oo ooo
OO •— 1 t— I i— 1


oO. — .. — . oo. — .. — . OO -— ^ . — .
o 0s in ^ ox oo oo t — • — <
rHoo^ • — i^in ' — i^fin
h
E
H_> (U W
rH 00 fi rH ^00
o -^ •-• -^ u -^
^00 "00 ^ 00
0) 0) 0)
< 	 1 1 	 1 ! 	 1
•rH «rH »i— 1
a a a
W ' J% m ' JZ M ' Jin"
OO rH CO rH OO rH
V^1^ N/OO^\. x/OOAj













«—H in cr^
• • •
QN (jx (js



o oo r~
oo OO ^O



O in rH
• • •
m rH m
rH 1 	 II 	 1

o m ^f
rH i— 1




in oo •— i
oo o o'
rH rH rH


in" ^~. ^
OO O rH
rH OO [^
I— 1
a
o
*~& o
O rH
O —^
3 S[



None
Window
Central
00
fl
•r-l
rt
o
.1-4
H->
£
rt
0
U

j.
•i-l


•xF CM r- m to CM
• • • • •
O CN] r\3 -xF O^ •— t
r— I i — t i — 1 t—t i-H


o^ »— ' 0s LO iT*"" ^o
CM CM to r\j — i ^



xo xf ^t^ rH in oo
• • • • • •
oo 0s o^ so ^* ^^
OO rH l— 1 OO rH vO

^ ^ OO rH O OO
O^ rH 00 rH




r*- r*~ (7s ' — t rH in
oo rt* oo o --H oo
OO rH rH OO •— 1 i— <


Co" *-^ --~ Co" — ~ *-*
oo in rH o f- cr-
rH OO sD rH OO ^f
•^ '%
nj ™
rH

5° 00 "£00
H ^^ Q -^^
O 00 rC &0
i-l a^ to 3,



> r-l > •— '
n rt o rt
O IH O ^
CU t) HV> 1) T3 +J
fi C S fi fl S
Q .rH (U Q MH H)
2 p5 U Z ^ o












233

-------

ti
cd
CD


rd
CD
U
• iH
r^j
4J
CD
eomi
O

— £
CO
•i-J
a
cd
a
0
• rH
!H
(X
m
O
„
O
5










rH
CD
4->
CO
rd
U
cd
_}


CO
CD
, — i
CD
00
rt
^
CO
o




CD
C
r-H
fl)
VW
CO
_J
re
PQ

'rd
o
[H



0)

CO
CO
•rH
H

o --H m
oo oo oo


oo oo r-
OO OO -J3


in ^ oo
• • •
r-H O vO
i — 1 r-H r-H
—
rH 3" ^
1 — 1 r-H




O O 00
O C> 00


Co" .—. — ..
Tf 00 r-H
-H oo r*-




CD
fl rH
• tH -^
^ 00
£> =k
00 oo O
O 0s 0s
rH CD O


O 00 rH
OO OO vQ

r-H OO rH
t**- ^O vO
• • •
o o o

O vO oo
l-H r-H



00 00 00
r^ r~ oo
C3 CD O


OO --^ — ^
OO 00 ^
i — i oo ^O




CO
 --. — , - 	 "^
t— oo o Tf oo mooooo1^"
rHOOrHOO i-HOOrHOO

"6 ^

CD UH
1^ O
0 rH 5P 00
o • — " ^^
rH 00 O 00
w sk '-I ^k

m oo I-H -^o oo
rH OO OO O" 00
oo

00 CD Tt1 CT" sO
LO i-H


r*- LO Is- r-
• * * •
O ^O ^f •"- '
x^H ,-H r-H CO

ON f\j ^Q [-^, O
>sO «~H




oo o^ vO M oo
C\3 -<^ t^- xO M


^ ^ ^ ^ ^
C^J OO O vO O
,-H C\] i— H --H
M
• H
HH
I-M
^_)
-H 00
0 \
rC! 00
vy a.

r- oo r- in rH
oo m t-- ^o oo


Tf oo oo oo oo
OO rH rH


y^ ro T^* r^~
• • • •
oo oo oo oo
rH rH

0s xO r^ oo CD
ON 1 — 1 rH




1^1 r-H 00 ^O rH
o r^- o r~- osi


OO ^-, ^ -_ ^-^ _ _^
oo oo o •vf oo
-H 00 rH OO




CD
2 ^

^ ~oo
D 5k
     £3
 
-------
ON CM 00 IN- -HH
•j t( ON O ID IN- NO
"Jj ^ 0 rH rH 0 O
J3 CO
rl «J
^ u
"^ $ NO co co CM r-
o) J f- ^ ^
r-1
O
'rH Tf 00 CO CO
+j ?. FN- NO m m
cu JJ ....
d 'J oooo
hn
o °P
CO I-1
0 <
o r~ o r^- fN] o
-C X 00 ^ rH
^
rd
OH
'o «
Tj S in rH TJH ^ ^
•^ S oo oo IN- NO NO
^ co d d d d d
^ cd
m CQ
o
rH ^.^^
O o NO 0 0 TJH C--
S r, -H CM •— i CM

0)
rj CQ
M <" bO
co 0 -~.
•H CU M
H rH =L
CO
f~H

^J
rH CU
O >H
M rt
y **>
rd .H
rH U

NOr-in OO-vfrH CMrHT^
OOrHON LOCMCM CMNOCM
rH rH rH rH rH rH


2"cO-HHO o'co-*!^ O^cOcM
m m -Nt<


rHrHrH-stH [N-Tt-HrH CM rH



rHCjNintN- rHOQinCM rH[N--HH-NtH
rH 00 •— 1 OO NO
1 •- -3
C nj rd
|^^
o E E
T3 O 4->
O -H °° bO rH bfl
o -- g -^ o -—
•-* bo 0 bo X! bfi
PQ d^ p-J a. t75 =L



^ ^ fl 7! a ^
cd g rd ™ rd ™
"r^rnCO "AHdO) "^SCU
|«-S| p-S| 8J533
Smo^ ScPOr^ 2cqo^


OH
3
o
rH
O

•a
rd
•i->
w
NO NO CO
IN- OO O CM NO IN- ON
•Nf N£> i-H 00 O rH O
1 — 1


-HCO-N^O O CO -HH Tf<
NO in

ON NO ON m
r^t^-r^oo coNOcoin
• • • • ••••
m o r^ •— ' oooo
rH rH



>-H N.O " 	 1 O ' 	 1 NO ' 	 1 NO
rH CO rH CM



ON NO O 00
CM ON ON co co NO co r-
moNOON oOf-no
rH



CM o m o >-H ON m o
rH ON rH 00


0) »
.SC o^°
rH 00 ® bO
D SK rH d.



s ^ rt ^
rd ™ cd "3
u^dco % ^ a  r5 h ^
SCQOr^ SfflO^










Z35

-------

J J.
C CD
£ o
s 5
Td C
ri rt
0 HH.
J
u
•rH
J.
H^ »
_, fl)
S '-H
H <"
hr
O rf
I) rH
0 <
CO
* o
Wl— 1
1
4-i
a
nj
OH
'o «
.H c
-J-i *H
i; H
CL S
^ «j
«*H PQ
0
1 — 1
. ni
1 o
C- H

0)
3
CO
CO
• rH
H

CO
rH
CD
>
0)
J





JH
o
H->
CJ
ni
rH

rO x£>
9
0 O
1 — 1

r- o
^


xD Tf
00 rJH
rH r-H



^r-S ^— *
o m
CO -H




•* o
o oo'
r 	 1 ' 	 1


r- ^
t— oo
. — i
o
T) 0
O rH
O -~s.
•—< ao
CQ a,
.oyment
loynnent
i — i • x
tl
0) ^
 oo
rH -~s
o oc
rJ 3s
.oyment
loyment
t!
0) ^
0) ^
§.§
-^ -^
rH **
rH rH
3 nj
h OH









m o
a »
rH in
rH rH

in oo
CO


r^ co
O ^HH
rH CO



~-s ^-s
CO O
00




CO OO
•^ oo
rH CO


oo r~-
in rH
rH
•rH
nJ
rH
4_1
rH 00
O --
J5 00
CO 3>
.oyment
loyment
1!
CL) ^
il
'X3 H->
x £
3 nJ
h CL









so r^
0 •
r- xQ

oo o
•tf


00 O
ax oo
i — i



*—^ *~~*
o m
CO rH




rH xO
CO 0^



oo" 5""
r^ oo


CD
fl rH
• H - — ^
^ 00
P a.
.oyment
loyment
I"!
0) 
-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
  EPA-600/1-76-019
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  BASELINE LEVELS OF PLATINUM  AMD PALLADIUM IN HUMAN
  TISSUE
                                                           5. REPORT DATE
                                                            March 1976
                                    6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHOR(S)
  Donald E. JoFinson, R, John  Prevost, John B. Tillery,
  David E. Camann and John H.  Hosenfeld
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Southwest Research Institute
  8500 Culebra Road
  San Antonio, Texas 78284
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                        1AA601
                                     11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                        68-02-1274
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Health Effects Research Laboratory
  Office of Research and Development
  U.S.  Environmental Protection  aqency
  Research Triangle Park. N.C.   27711
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                        Final
                                     14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                                        EPA-ORD
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
        This report presents the  results  of an epidemiological  study  of populations
   living near a freeway in Los Angeles,  California, and in the high  desert region of
   Lancaster, California, for concentrations of platinum, palladium,  and lead in blood,
   urine;, hair, feces, autopsy tissues,  ambient air, surface water  and soil.  Platinum
   and palladium are determined in  samples from miners in Sudbury,  Ontario, Canada, and
   metal  refinery workers in New  Jersey.
        Analytical  methods are developed  for platinum, palladium, and lead using
   atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
        The objective is to determine  baseline levels of platinum and palladium in the
   population and environment prior to wide-spread use of catalyst-equipped vehicles.
   Lead is determined to ascertain  the future epidemiological effect  of non-leaded
   gasoline.
        Platinum and palladium concentrations were below the detection limit for Los
   Angeles, Lancaster, and Sudbury  samples.   Refinery workers'  urine  and refinery air
   samples has detectable concentrations  of both metals.
        Higher lead values were observed  in Los Angeles samples taken near the San
   Diego  Freeway than in samples  taken in the high desert area  of Lancaster, California.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                        c.  COS AT I field/Uroup
  Platinum
  Palladium
  Lead
  Bioassay
  Air pollution
  Water analysis
  Soil analysis
Catalytic converters
 06,  F
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  RELEASE TO PUBLIC
                       19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                           UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES
       252
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)

                                                 UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                        22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                            237

-------