-------
data in Table II-7 which indicates no usage of plastics molding in
SIC 355 and only 31 such operations in SIC 357. The discrepancy
between plant survey data and the Census information as shown in
Table II-7 cannot be explained. It is pointed out, however, that in
the contractor's opinion, the number of the various unit processes in
SIC 355 and 357 quoted in Table II-7 may be low.
The slight usage of plastics molding operations in SIC 355 is
due to the fact that the bulk of the machinery products of this
industry are so large that plastic parts would not be functional.
The SIC 357 products are much lighter in weight and their saleability
is enhanced by the esthetics of plastic decorations.
Scrap plastic may be either thermoplastic or thermosetting
polymers. Examples of the former are acetyls, acrylics, nylons,
polystyrenes, and cellulosics; alkyds, aminos, epoxies, phenolics,
polyesters, and others belong to the thermosetting class.
This is a solid waste which ranges in size from pellets to
pieces several inches in dimension. A great deal of the
thermoplastic type material is mixed with new resin and recycled —
more than 50 percent in some cases — although product quality and
color blends place limits on the percentage which can be reused
successfully. The waste quantities are greater from thermosetting
operations because these materials cannot be recycled since their
chemical properties are changed in the molding process. The plant
surveys indicate, however, that the use of the reuseable
thermoplastic resins is much more common in SIC 357 than
thermosettingo
Purge materials will contain varying percentages of two resins,
one used to remove the other from the machine.
The scrap plastic discarded may retain a residue of hydraulic
oil, the nature of which is described in the Raw Materials section,
and/or mold-release agents. Small quantities of the hydraulic oil —
on the order of pint or quart cans — may also be disposed of from
time to time along with other plant wastes of this type or may be
contained in floor sweepings from the molding area.
Mold-release agents include compounds such as waxes, silicones,
fluoroplastics, metallic stearates, polyethylene, or a wide variety
of proprietary chemical blends [56]. There are insufficient data on
the losses of these materials to quantify them, but it is estimated
that they amount to one percent or less of the total scrap plastic
waste.
These wastes are not considered potentially hazardous based on
the contractor's criteria as described earlier in this section.
146
-------
The overall quantities of process waste from plastics molding
operations are relatively small. On both a wet and dry basis, the
generation rate is approximately 0.12 kkg/yr-Dept. employee. Based
on an average process department size of four employees, which was
found from the plant survey data, the total quantity of process waste
generated is about 15 kkg/year (17 tons/yr) in SIC 357. Based on
Census data as documented in Table II-7, a negligible amount of
plastics molding waste is generated in SIC 355. This waste stream is
not considered potentially hazardous by the contractor.
Assembly
Assembly in the surveyed plants is mostly a manual floor or
bench operation using small hand tools. A good example of this is
the sub-assembly of printed circuit boards with wiring and other
components, and the subsequent final assembly of an entire electronic
calculator with attendant testing. In some cases, soldering,
welding, adhesives, or solvent degreasing are employed. A typical
assembly operation is shown in Figure 111-13.
Assembly operations were found at 17 SIC 355 plants and nine SIC
357 facilities. Census data in Table II-7 show that no plants in SIC
355 reported assembly operations and 226 out of a total of 4730
plants in SIC 357 listed this function.
The assembly waste stream as it was reported by the surveyed
plants includes wire cippings, solder dross, fluxes, oil, solvents,
and spent welding rods. All of these have been addressed previously
except solder dross. This consists of an insoluble mixture of lead
and tin and, in many cases, antimony which is added to improve
certain characteristics of the soldered joint. The quantities of
these waste constituents are generally quite small and are combined
with machining and fabricating wastes for disposal in sanitary
landfills.
QUANTITIES OF WASTES
Quantities of total wastes, total potentially hazardous wastes,
and total hazardous constituents have been estimated for both SIC 355
and 357 and are presented in Tables 111-18, 19, and 20 for SIC 355,
and Tables 111-21, 22, and 23 for SIC 357. State and regional
breakdowns of process waste generation for SIC 355 and 357 for 1975,
1977, and 1983 are presented in Tables 111-24-29. Waste generation
factors developed from 1975 data collected during the plant surveys
inreach department were used to estimate 1977 and 1983 waste
quantities. These estimates are based on the assumption that process
technology as shown in Table II-7 in these industries will not change
significantly by 1983. A linear extrapolation of production employee
147
-------
-M
re
o
•i—
s_
-O
re
<*-
-O
C
re
o
re
to .a
-p E
s_ a>
re to
a. to
x o •—
3.P£
U_ -l-> "O
•> 4) nS
to > —J
0>r-
C O >»
•i- C/1 S-
(tJ C
ce
en
c
•r~
J2
O
O
re
to
O)
C
re
3
CT
re
to
Q.
to
a)
-t->
to
re
2 •
to
d) O)
to -t->
oj to
^ re
I- -3-
co
i
oe:
uu
ix
O
1-1 00
u_ oo
-------
GO
^
1
1-4
M
Hf
H
CO
i
M
OS
1*
<
PL,
2
>•
as
u
z
M
g
S
3
§
cn
3
O
Z
M
_]
<
HH
U
u
en
g
M CO
H rH
06 *^
U O
£ H ^-»
m u M
ui u r-i a
c*> a cu
w S >>
cj H 3 -^
H U) i-l 00
Cfl •< *J Jd
3 co Ji
z ^^
tn
M in
Id r-
ss
J*
0-
4.
>
1.
c
a
c
4
3
4.
4.
CO
a
C
T3
^
CO
N
CD
X
Total
Cfl QC
00 C
S «
"a. c
rt) (j
S 0
m
en
m
r^.
CN
»
CU
•o
c
a
x
u
-H
a c
•* 5
t-t -H
^~ 3
CO ^H
•0 O
-H en
u
<
t
I
|
1
CN
0
^
"*
a
> a
3 «
S JS
S
o
00 1 1
CO 1 1
r- CM 1
0 r*. |
CM
sv co
<*^ PH p^
§o o
o o
en r- o
00 <*C 0*
*"*
§o o
o o
\O i/> r*^
C-^ *S I-T
o o o
en r-. O
00 c^ O
00
00 C
•H U "O
ij ce c
<0 rH (0
•*
CU f-t O CU
E W U tfa
1
1
tn
n
u^
r^
rg
1
1
CO
CO
1
1
as
r^
CN
1
1
1
1
O
CO
^
N
)-i
13
C
3 cn
O _1
H
cn O
3 H
O
OJ
a
o «
z
T3
C
o
o
f-
•o
c
co
•u
a
o
•a
c
a
2
oo ao
3J CO
3 3
C
o
o
149
-------
3
03
<:
H
cj
z
M
D
H
CJ
Ei4
3
z z
< o
a M 01
>-. < to
El K 4-J
w wo
Z Z H ^
M in W v-i
X IT) O rH CO
on co o)
<; w s >-,
s u H o —
M t/l -H 00
j cn < -M .*;
S sz~
o; en
H en r-.
CO Mr-
§ O ^
rH Pw
J
<;
ia
CO
'
3
|4
0,
en
C
01
3
^
'^j
en
c
o
CJ
tn
3
0
^
CO
N
CO
EC
rH
CO
u
H
CO
w w
00 C
a c
!«
01
•a
c
CO
0
in
CO 1 1 I
I 1 I
CM
1 CO 1 1
1 CO 1 1
-H
CO C
^ 0
CJ
I r-. CN i
1 0 r^ |
CM
O CN CO >
Q
0 O 0 O
o o o o
r*» ^o in r*«
-*T rH sD
^^
4-1
3
iJ
2-
-
i£
S-i
U
•£
O O O O
o o o o
O m r-. o
O CO ft O^
o o o o
o o o o
rH" -J3
^
•u
*J
x^
o o o o
0 O 0 0
O en r-. O
O co po c^
r^-
I
1
m
QO
cn
CM
1
1
CO
00
1
1
—
(^
CM
1
1
^
^o
CM
"
1
I
CM
CM
>
M
T3
C
ri
i
01
E-
rtj
01
^
tn
00
c
•H
01
CO
3
0)
T3
01
4J
03
3
>^
C
CO
4J
to
e
•H
4J
01
01
cn
)H
0
4J
0
to
I*
c
o
u
01
u
i-l
3
O
CO
150
-------
en oo
oo c
a
•H
0. C
el)
T3
C
cu
T3
01
a.
o
00
B
en
>-. rH
CO U
SB S
•o
e
a
CN
rH 4J
CO CO
-H CO
C
0) en
0 0
P-i 13
i-i
rH CQ
CO N
4-1 CO
H *
^^
CN
0)
4-t
Cfi
CO
cO
4-1
O
H
-7
Q^
o
o
o
r*.
X^v
4J
4-1
O
O
m
CN
rH
CN
o
o
o
CN
rH
O
O
o
rH
C" J
•a
c
CO
§•
-C
3
CL
O
£,
0)
g
•H
G
S.
ao
C
-H
4J
ca
u
H
0)
33
fcO
c
.u
cd
H
d,
O
j_i
U
01
rH
UJ
00
c
•H
4J
ft
^0
•o
G
3
*O
C U}
CO 3
O
W Jw
3 rJ
O 01
M C
0) O
tu Z
O
o
H
en
0)
•a 3
m
"D T3
C
CO tu
151
-------
rH
CN
1
rH
TABLE
U
z
M
C£
B
o
<
Eh
1
?M
S
Z
1
i
M r~
H in
Z O
la
cj cn
<£
<
O
z
H
H
3
ft.
S
o
u
CJ
!n
b
O
M 01
El rH
22
§5-
2 v
U «H CO
co eg
w c >>
H o --v
en -H oo
cn
rH
o>
sD
r~»
tQ
CO <->
CU HI
x z:
CN 1 r^ r** I
in t rH CN 1
rn"
CO
1 — CJ
vO -H
CO rH
"H O
b en
CN
>^
i-l (U
rH *J
CO CO
-H CO
W 3
C
i.
to
CO
S
Cl
4J
O
H
4J
3
>-
M
a
^^
m CN I-H
cn oo i oo o> i
I i
00 m rH
3
CO *J
xTi U
m 3
«> M
•H
00
£
U
•H
3
><
Ui
18
>
rH
rH
•H
3
•a
B
CO
CU
i
a
X
O
M
a
a
CO
eg
v^
CO
01
rH
CO
4_l
O
4-1
Q>
U
U)
CO
3
0)
CO
«
J=
00
c
^
>
-H
V4
CL1
TJ
C
•H
T3
CU
CO
3
cn
r4
O
4J
O
CO
IH
u
•a
•H
eg
*o
eg
01
3
01
E
-,
01
00
B
•H
01
CU
iJ
CO
S
•H
u
cn
eg
rH
S_x
O-
o
^
c/]
OJ
c
•tH
-C
CJ
CO
X
00
c
•H
iJ
CO
cu
J_(
H
u
CO
(U
£
00
(3
T«l
4J
CO
rH
Q.
O
^
j_l
CJ
CU
rH
[Jj
00
c
T-(
4J
CO
o
U
3
.2
•n
C 01
CO 3
o
CO r-J
3 1-1
o eg
h >U
n c
0) O
Eo Z
2 §
^ H
H
8
;
tn
cu
T3
3
i-H
U
c
l__,|
s
H
•o
§
4J
CU
5
0)
H
CN
CU
13
CU
j_l
CO
to
13
>,
C
CO
CO
^
u
C
8
OJ
U
i-<
3
O
C/5
152
-------
CN
a *-* a
z <*> a 01
CJ M en i-t oo
CJ CO < U Jt
< 3 o jt
O en
< u r»
O O rH
Z OS
M a.
H
i
u
w
ej
M
C>4
o
^N
u
3
^
;*
jO
CO
2
4J
en
G
O
U
CO
3
O
•O
I*
CO
N
£
ft
ea
4J
^
-JJ
0)
U OC
00 C
C "^
Cu C
cu -rt
3 5
cn
QJ
C
w
>^
u
CJV
xC
p*.
m
rH
1
1
•H
3 §
CO »H
•0 0
TH cn
u
<
1
I
iH
O
1
M i-l
2* CO
Su
01
s x
CM
u-i
•
"*
CD
i-* M
J3 U
CD C
§ V
S >
CO •— t
E,?
u-i
n
r^
CO
*•"*.
N
iH (U
«H 4J
0) 00
T* eg
S3
01 M
0 0
eu -D
i—t £8
CO N
H
^^
CN
*"^)
iJ
cn
^-t
ca
*•*
o
t-t
-7
•3
>
u.
a
«^
0
o
o
m
CN
4-1
3
1
0
o
o
ON
fl
'"" T
S
14
Q
4J
2
4J
2
S-^
2
Cfl
a
S
CO
w
4)
U
o
h
04
O
O
o
m
CN
0
cr
(*1
-^
^^
a.
o
j:
cn
cu
c
-rl
*CJ
CO
2
1
1
00
in
m
vO
^
-»
CN
1
1
1
1
0
U1
CN
S
£
^
i—4
1
1
00
m
m
**
P-I
t
1
O
o
m
GO*
J
CN
c
o
in
O
vC
§ S
O ' r*
CN CN
CM
a>
>>
la
1
3 tn
O )M
13 ^H
C CO O
(8 3 H
o
cn i-
3 W
O CU
V-i 'fc<
V O
tt. Z
3)
O.
O
oo
C
•o
§
= -3
" 2
3 a
- I
*
CO
c
00
c
I I
a *
(U .
cn -a
3 «>
cn
to 3
M
0 «
y 3J
u-i cn
u cn
oo ca
aj •*
3 w
•O 3
01
•a -a
4-1 CO
41 a
3 3
153
-------
cj
Z
rH
en.
frH
<
Zl
s
£
~£
M
X
o
Z
H m
Z en
O U
C_) rH
u en
a
z
CO
M
1
U
u
o
z
o
rH 01
EH rH
Qb *J
w o
Z EH — .
O rH CO
a eu
W C >*
EH 0 -~
e/i -H 00
3 et) jrf
C/3
cn en
£d 00
O rH
OS
o-.
4J
"^
^
U
Q
01
4J
C
tu
3
^Jj
01
C
O
o
01
3
O
•o
CO
N
CO
X
to
o
H
CO
cn at
M e
C -H
a c
-!
o
-tf
•H
otj C
rH i-l
CO i-H
T3 O
•H W
o
l
1
•H
O
§
^
«
CD *•*
1)
cn IH
rH O
Cm cn
CM ^
r-H CU 3
l-H U
CO 01 >>
•H CO ij
"SO
C v-'
m
cn
00
o
o
o
-*
a-
rH
^^
a.
o
cn
0)
c
•H
CJ
2
I
1
O
m
^o
0
iH
H
O
rH
oo"
m
i
i
o
o
o
o
o
o
CM
rH
O
O
O
m
o
0
o
2
00
c
•H
ij
01
H
0)
X
1
I
rH
00
CN
CM
r-
rH
0
rH
^.
r-
CM
CN
OO
00
en"
o
o
o
o
0
o
cn
CM
O
0
o
1 —
o
o
0
o"
00
c
•H
CO
o.
o
ectr
a
l
i
l
l
m
o
(N
l
l
m
cs
l
l
CO
in
m
^r
rH
I
t
O
0
o
un
00
l
l
O
o
o
r- 1
O
o
oo
CO
r-t
0
o
o
CO
rH
00
c
•H C/)
t> -4
rH <£
O EH
S 0
EH
01
U
01
CO ,
£ ;
J=.
4J
•H
3
C
CO
cn
C
o
•H
4J
CO
•»
•H
00
J2
c ij
5 *
» >>
CO ]^
u to
•rt >
M
n .
•^ rH
5 3
rt 3
2 •§
3 §
0 tj,
2 «
jj e
cn ^
^> §
1 1
o. a,
1 s
CO (o
f-l
| 2
& I
CO
•§ *
CO aj
cn
oS J2
c •£
•H
J^ 00
i 5
3 5
M
oo ^ -:
.5 ^
"£ C co
a, «H rj
s
to T3 M
S o) e 01
vi 01 a> aj
3 AJ 4-J
'* 01 CO
°- m >, S
2 r< 01 iH
So u
tf> u 00 01
u o <"
« C8 -H
T< UH U M
0 « 0
•* ri ecj o
_, -a 3 to
^ 01 U
° T3 TJ U
° C C
H CO 01 O
01 ij rn
01 a) ea
^33
3 CU
^ 0) >> a
y £ c IH
-------
TABLE 111-24
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMft
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
bJAUlA T T
MAWA1 1
IDAHO
Tl 1 TWT1TQ
ll-LirKJl 3
T Kin T AMA
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
T Y
1 A
X
y/T T
VI 1
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
2538.
0.
730.
689.
16449.
349.
7790.
1211,
422° .
4916!
110.
0.
21046.
3119.
3237.
2386,
18'' 6.
1200.
963,
4473.
23070.
3907,
2304.
1289,
1791 .
107.
207,
110.
2030 ,
16341,
110.
15755.
15598.
190.
27351,
2-115.
3018.
21906.
5623.
11423.
190.
3597".
5U3.
110.
1216.
22"7 .
4344,
611 ,
11320 .
334,
(Pry Wt.)
2235.
0.
630.
596.
14210.
302.
6730.
1046.
3647,
4247,
95,
0.
18872.
7014.
2"'"6.
204 .
1040.
5549.
2071.
554.
300.
416,
25.
67.
26.
483.
3799.
26.
3663.
3626.
44.
6350.
562.
702.
5114,
1307,
2656.
44.
836.
1189.
26.
283.
534.
1126.
142.
2748.
78.
Flammable
Solvents
235.
0.
66.
63.
1496.
32.
709,
110.
384.
447.
10.
0.
1987,
738.
294.
217.
171.
116,
88.
407,
2171.
810.
217,
1 17,
163.
10.
26.
10.
1S9.
i486.
10.
1433,
1419,
17.
248S.
220.
274,
2001.
511,
1039,
17.
327,
465.
10.
11 I,
209.
441 ,
56,
1075.
30.
Heavy
Metals
36.1
0.
10.2
9.6
229.3
4.9
108.6
16.9
58.8
68.5
1.5
0.
304.5
113,2
45,1
33.3
26.1
17.8
13.4
62,3
332.7
124.1
33.2
18,0
25,0
1,5
4,0
1 ,5
2°,0
227.8
1 .5
219.6
217.4
2.7
301,2
33,7
42.1
306.6
73.4
159,2
2,7
50.1
71 .3
1 .5
16,9
32,0
67.5
3,5
164.7
4.6
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
41.4
0.
11.7
11.0
263.3
5.6
124,7
19.4
67.6
78,7
1,8
0.
349.7
130.0
51,8
38.2
30.0
20.5
15.4
71.6
382.]
142,6
38.2
20.6
28.7
1.7
4.6
1 ,8
33.3
261.6
1.8
252.2
249.7
3.0
437.8
38,7
48,3
352.1
90,0
182.9
3.0
57.6
81,8
1,8
19.5
36 . 9
77,5
9,8
189,2
5,3
2.6
0,
.7
.7
16.8
,4
8.0
1,2
4.3
5.0
.1
0.
oo t 3
3.3
3.3
2.4
1,9
1.3
1,0
4,6
24.4
9.1
2.4
1 .3
1.8
. 1
, 3
. 1
2. 1
16.7
, 1
16, 1
15,9
, 2
27.9
2,5
3.1
22.5
5. 7
11.7
3,7
5.2
. 1
1 .2
2.3
5,0
* 6
12, 1
, 3
Sweepings &
Cyanide
,8
0,
o
1 2
5.3
.1
2.5
.4
1.4
1.6
.0
0,
7.0
2.6
1 ,0
,8
.6
.4
.3
1 .4
7,7
2.9
.8
,4
,6
.0
.1
,0
,7
5,2
,0
5.1
5,0
. 1
3,3
,8
1,0
7,1
1.8
3,7
, t
1 ,2
J .6
.0
,4
.7
1 .6
o
3,8
, I
Grind ing s
260.
0.
73.
69.
1653.
35.
783.
122 .
424.
494.
11.
0.
2195.
816.
325,
240.
139.
129 .
97.
449.
2399.
895,
240,
130.
tso.
11,
29,
11 ,
209,
1642,
11.
1583.
1568.
19.
2749.
243.
303.
2210,
565.
1] 48.
19,
362,
514.
LI.
1.22,
231.
487,
61.
1 108.
34,
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
274000. 236700. 101000,
63700,
24920, 3819-0 4306.0
280.0
41541,
32096.
30587.
45510.
3041S,
9648,
7714.
1269.
17358.
7362.
35886,
27727,
26424.
39314.
69460.
3335.
6664.
109o .
14995.
6792,
15312,
11831,
11275,
16775,
29642,
3556 ,
2843.
468 .
6398.
2898,
9657.
7462.
7111.
105 SO,
10695,
2243,
1793.
295.
4035.
1828.
3778,
2919,
27R2,
4139,
7314.
,877.
702,
115,
1579.
715,
57^ , 0
447, 4
426.3
634-, 3
1120.0
134.5
107.5
17. 7
241.9
109,6
665
513
48"
728
1237
154
123
20
277
125
.0
,8
.6
,3
,2
.4
» 5
T
.8
.8
42,
32,
31 .
T6%
82.
9,
7,
1 ,
17,
8,
5
8
3
•5-
')
9
9
3
7
0
13,5
10,3
9.3
14,6
25.3
3,1
2 . 5
, 4
5,6
2.5
4175
3225
3074
4G73
3081
970
775
123
1744
790
155
-------
TABLE 111-25
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
J
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
(Wet Wt.)
2380.
0.
671.
634,
15128.
321,
7165,
1114.
3383.
4521.
L01.
0.
20092.
7467,
2977,
21.95.
1725.
L178.
835.
4 L 1 3 ,
21953.
b'L92.
2193,
L LS6.
1 647,
"9,
266.
101 ,
1913,
15029,
101.
14490,
1 4346.
175 .
25 1 55 .
2221.
2775,
51 72,
1 0506,
175,
3309,
4/02.
101.
1 US.
21J2,
4455,
562.
10870.
307.
252000,
J8205,
29519,
23132,
41056-.
7395'=.
3873.
7095,
1 J 67,
15064,
"231 -
Waste
Hazardous Waste
(Dry Wt.) (Wet Wt.)
2054.
0.
579.
547.
13057,
277.
6184,
3351.
3902.
37.
0.
17341.
6445.
2569,
1894.
1489.
1016,
764,
3550 .
10943.
7070.
L892,
1024,
1 422 ,
05.
229.
87,
loSt.
12972 ,
87,
12506.
12382.
1C I .
2 1 -• 1 1 .
J 9 1 7 .
2395.
17460'.
1464.
9063.
151,
2056 .
4059.
965.
1323.
3045.
401J.
9302,
262,
217500.
32975,
25473.
24280.
36125.
63333,
7659,
6123,
1003.
13773.
6241,
859.
0.
242 ,
229 ,
5463 .
116.
2537.
402.
1402.
1633,
36.
0.
7255,
2697.
1075,
793.
623,
425,
320,
1485,
7927,
2958.
792 >
428.
595.
36.
96.
36,
691.
5427,
36.
5232,
5180,
63,
9084,
302,
1 002.
7305 .
I860,
3794.
63 .
1 15 /'9 ,
l.-)2 L -
Flammable
Solvents
208.
0.
59.
55.
1323.
28.
626.
97.
339.
395.
9.
0.
1757.
653.
260,
192,
151,
103.
77,
360.
1919,
716.
192.
104.
144.
9.
23.
9.
167,
1314,
9,
1267.
1254.
15.
2199.
194.
243,
1769,
452,
919.
IS .
239,
411.
9,
98 .
135,
390,
49,
950.
27,
22033,
3340,
2531,
2460.
3660.
6466.
776.
620.
102.
1.396.
632-
Heavy
Metals
32
0
9
8
205
4
97
15
52
61
1
0
272
101
40
29
23
1.6
12
55
290
Lll
29
16
2°
1
3
I
26
-204
1
196
194
2
341.
30
37
274
70
1 42
2
44
63
1
15
28
60
7
147
4
3422
518
400
382
568
1004
120
96
15
216
90
,3
.1
.6
,4"
.4
.3
,1
. 7
,4
.4
.8
,4
,4
.3
. 4
.0
,0
,9
. I
.8
,1
.4
.3
, 6
. 4
,0
,1
.4
.8
,3
, 4
.6
, 7
,7
o
, 7
,4
.9
,9
, 1
.2
-7
.5
.6
,6
,0
.0
,9
.0
,4
,3
, 5
» 3
.9
,0
,2
Acids/Alkali
Sweepings &
Oils Solution Cyanide
40
0
11
10
256
5
121
13
65
76
1
0
340
126
50
37
29
19
15
69
371
L38
37
20
T7
1
L
32
254
1
245
242
3
425
47
342
87
J77
3
56
79
1
18
35
75
9
133
5
4264
64i>
499
4"76
708
125J
150
120
L9
270
1 22
.3
.4
.7
,0
.4
t 2
.8
.5
,7
.0
.4
.4
.1
t 2
.9
,0
,6
,5
,6
.1
.1
,9
er
,7
.4
,3
.7
> o
> 7
, 6
.6
,0
.3
.8
,0
.0
,6
,7
.9
. 7
,4
.5
.9
.2
,0
, o
, 5
,0
, 2
- 4
, L
,0
,0
, 1
3
2,6
0.
.7
.7
16,8
.4
8.0
1.2
4.3
5.0
,1
0,
22,3
8,3
3.3
2.4
1,9
1.3
1 ,0
4,6
24,4
9.1
2.4
1.3
1 .8
.1
,3
,1
2.1
16.7
,1
16. I
15.9
27,9
3,1
1?!2 * 5
5,7
11.7
,2
3,7
5.2
. 1.
1,2
2,3
5.0
,6
12.1
.3
200.0
42.5
32,8
31,3
46. G
32,2
9,9
"7 , 9
t ,3
17,7
0,0
.8
0.
t 2
5.3
.1
2.5
,4
1.4
1 .6
,0
0.
7.0
2,6
1 .0
.8
.6
,4
.3
1,4
7.7
2.9
,8
.4
,6
-0
. t
,0
5,2
,0
5.1
5.0
,1
8.8
.8
1 .0
7. t
1.8
3.7
. i
1,2
1,6
,0
,4
,7
1.6
3.8
, 1
88.0
13.3
10.3
9,3
14,0
25,8
3.1
2 , 5
, 4
5.6
2,5
Grindings
225 *
0.
64.
60.
1433.
30.
679.
105,
368.
428.
10.
0.
1903.
707.
282,
208,
163,
112.
84,
390.
2079,
776.
203.
112.
156.
9.
25,
10.
131 .
1423.
10.
1372.
1359.
17,
2382.
210,
263,
1916.
490.
995.
17.
313.
445,
10.
106.
200,
422.
53.
1029,
29 ,
2306:..
3618,
27°
-------
TABLE 111-26
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)(Dry Wt.)
2276.
0.
642.
606.
14468.
307.
6852.
1065,
3713.
4-524.
96,
0.
1971 5.
7 1 4 I .
2847.
2097.
16bO.
L L .26 .
847.
^934,
20905,
78:54.
20° 7 .
1134-
1575,
90.
251.
96.
1829,
1.43/3.
96-
1,5057.
1J720,
167.
24056 *
2 1 .14 ,
2654,
1 •' 3 4 '.' -
474.4,
LOO »/-
167.
jlo4.
44«7,
96.
1 069.
2020.
4261 .
538.
10396.
293.
'J4 LOOO.
365 38,
'•>;-!23i .
"6904.
•SO 029.
•'0730-
SM06.
67'•>
18426.
2794,
21.58.
2057.
306fr>
5400.
649.
519,
f!5.
1167.
529.
Heavy
Metals
28.5
0.
8.0
7.6
181.4
3.9
85.9
13.4
46.6
54.2
1.2
0.
240.9
89,5
35.7
26.3
20-7
14.1
10.6
49.3
263.3
98.2
26,3
14.2
19. Q
1 . 2
3,2
1 .2
22,9
180.2
1 .2
173,8
1 72 . 0
2.1
301.7
26 . 6
33.3
242,6
62,0
126.0
2. t
39.7
56.4
1.2
13.4
25.3
53,4
6.7
J 30 , 4
3.7
3022,0
458.2
354.0
337.4
501 ,9
806.9
106.4
85, 1
1. 4 . 0
191.4
G6, ?
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
109.0
0.
30.7
29.0
692.6
14.7
328. 0
51 .0
177.3
207.0
4.6
0.
919.3
341.9
136.3
100.5
79.0
53.9
40.5
138.3
1005.0
375.0
100,4
54.3
75.4
4.5
12 .2
4.6
87.6
oU8 . 1
4.6
663.4
656,8
8-0
1 151,6
101,7
I?/. 1
926.2
236.8
481 .0
8,0
151.5
215.3
4.6
51.2
96.7
204.0
25.7
497.7
14.0
11537.0
17?9. L
1351.4
1287.9
1916.2
3305 . 9
406,2
324,8
53.4
730,9
331,0
O t ">
0."
.6
.6
14.2
.3
6.7
1.0
3.7
4,3
.1
0.
18,9
7.0
2.8
2.1
1.6
1, 1
.8
3.9
20.6
7,7
2. 1
1.1
1 ,5
.1
t o
.1
1.8
14.1
.1
13.6
13.3
")
23. 7
2,1
2.6
19,0
4.9
9.9
( 'i
3, I
4.4
. L
I , 1
2,0
4.2
* 5
10.2
,3
23"'.0
\ 35.9
' 27,8
26, 5
39. -t
69,6
8, i
6.7
1,1
15,0
6,8
Sweepings &
Cyanide
3.4
0.
.9
.9
21.3
.5
10.1
1.6
5.5
6.4
.1
0.
28.3
10.5
4.2
3.1
2.4
1.7
1.2
5.8
30.9
11.5
3,1
1 .7
2.3
.1
.4
.1
2.7
21 .2
.1
20.4
20.2
t 2
35.4
3.1
3.9
28 . 5
7.3
11.8
•~t
4.7
6.6
. 1
1,6
3.0
6.3
,8
15.3
.4
^55.0
53.8
4J .6
39.6
59,0
104,2
12.5
10,0
1.6
22,5
10.2
Grindings
191.
0.
54.
51.
1212.
26.
574.
89.
311.
362.
3.
0.
1610.
598.
239.
176.
138.
94.
71.
330,
1759,
656.
176.
95.
132.
8.
21.
8.
153.
1204.
8.
1161.
1150.
14.
2016.
178,
222 +
1621.
414.
842.
L4.
265,
377,
8,
90.
169.
357.
45,
871..
25.
20194,
3062.
2366,
2254.
3354.
5927.
7J 1.
569,
9),
1279-
579,
157
-------
TABLE 111-27
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.) (Dry Wt.)
78.
0.
772.
2630.
16484.
4087,
3864.
1491.
1851 .
142.
0.
0.
3949.
1950.
102.
8o9,
3679.
38.
0.
504.
7724.
1669.
7086.
0,
197.
0.
150,
0.
737,
3 101.
51.5,
12443.
1 ^50,
0.
2960.
154",
415,
r'°o.
0.
623.
303 ,
458,
4720,
684.
174.
J3",
J*59.
0.
527,
293,
9T'00.
12538.
1 5544 .
4154.
8586.
181.41 ,
7556.
1325,
5781',
1 V 1 14,
195'^.
52.
0.
509.
1736.
10879.
2697.
2550 .
984.
1221 »
94.
0.
0.
2606.
1287.
67.
575.
2428,
25,
0,
336.
50 "8 ,
1102,
4677.
0.
1 30 .
0 ,
104,
0,
43ft,
2017,
340,
8212.
1 1 50 ,
0.
1953,
102?,
2 ''-I ,
1 1 S 1 ,
0,
411.
200.
3 or.
3115.
451.
115.
191 .
I29J.
0,
348.
194,
62500,
3275,
10259-
27 >2,
5667.
11973.
4987,
075,
38U.1,
L26L5.
1293,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
58.
0.
576.
1964.
12306.
3051 .
2885,
1113.
1382.
106.
0.
0.
2948.
1456.
76.
649.
2746.
29,
0.
436,
5767.
1246.
5291 .
0.
147,
0.
1 IS.
0,
550 .
2315,
384.
9290.
1310,
0.
221 0.
1157.
310.
1336,
0.
»ft!J.
226.
342.
35.? 4,
5J 1 .
130,
216.
J463.
0.
393 ,
219.
"'0700,
"360.
1 160':,.
3101,
6410,
13544.
564 L ,
090,
4317,
14270.
1463.
(Dry Wt.)
32.
0.
311.
1061.
6649.
1648.
1559.
602.
746.
57.
0,
0,
1593.
737,
41,
350,
14S4,
15.
0.
236,
3116.
673.
2359.
0,
79,
0.
64.
0.
297.
1251 .
208.
5019,
700.
0.
1194,
625,
16/.
722,
0.
251.
122.
185,
1904.
276.
70.
117.
7"0 .
0.
213.
118,
30200.
Ii057.
62/0.
1676.
3464.
7318,
3049.
535 *
Tl-r'-i
7710.
7Q0 ,
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
12.
0,
119,
404.
2534.
628.
594.
229 «
284.
22 *
0,
0.
607.
300.
16,
134-
566 »
6 +
0,
90.
1107.
257,
J 009 .
0,
30.
0.
24,
0.
1 .1 3 .
477,
"?'•> .
1913,
270.
0,
455 .
238,
64,
2 7 5,
0.
96.
47,
70,
726.
105,
27,
44.
30 I ,
0,
81 ,
4 5 ,
14558.
1927,
2390.
639,
1 520.
2709.
1 162,
204,
B89 .
2938 ,
30! .
Metals
1,6
0.
16.0
54.6
342.4
84.9
30.3
31.0
38.4
3.0
0.
0.
32,0
40.5
2.1
18.0
76.4
,8
0.
12.1
160.4
34,7
147,2
0.
4. 1
0,
3 . 3
0.
15.3
64 , 4
10,7
258 .5
36.5
0.
61,5
32 , 2
0,6
37,2
0,
12,9
6.3
9,5
98,0
14.2
3.6
6.0
40 , 7
0,
10.9
6,1
1967,0
260,4
322,9
86,3
173.3
37A.O
156.9
27,5
120, L
397,0
40,7
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
2,4
0.
23.5
80.1
502.0
124,5
117.7
45.4
56.4
4.3
0.
0,
120,3
59.4
3.1
26.5
112.0
1.2
0.
17.8
235.2
50.8
215.8
0,
6.0
0,
4.8
0.
22,4
94.5
15,7
378 , 9
5 3 » b
0.
90. 1
47.2
12.6
54,5
0,
19,0
9,2
14,0
143,8
20, H
5.3
a . 8
59,7
0.
J6.0
8,9
2384,0
381,8
473.4
126.5
261 .5
552,5
230.1
40.4
176. J
502,1
59.7
.3
0.
3.2
10.9
68.4
17.0
16.0
6.2
7.7
.6
0.
0.
16.4
8.1
.4
3.6
15.3
* ^
0.
2, 4
32.1
6,9
29.4
0.
,8
0.
. 7
0,
3, 1
J2.9
2,1
51.6
7.3
0.
12.3
6.4
1,7
7.4
0.
2.6
1.3
1.9
19.6
2.0
,7
1.2
8, I
0.
o o
1 .2
393,0
52,0
64 , 5
1 -.2
3 5 , 6
75.3
31.-)
Ll t llf
24.0
79,3
8. 1
Cyanide
.0
0.
» 5
1.6
10.1
2.5
2.4
.9
1.1
.1
0.
0.
2,4
1.2
. 1
.5
2.3
,0
0.
.4
4.7
1 ,0
4.3
0.
.1
0.
. 1
0.
* ^
I .9
,3
7,6
1 ,1
0 ,
1,8
.9
.3
i.i
0.
, 4
*•}
,3
2.9
. 4
, I
')
1 .2
0.
.3
» ^
50 . 0
7.7
9,5
2 . 5
5.3
11.1
4.6
,8
3,5
11.7
1 . 2
Sweepings &
Grindings
11.
0.
112.
382.
2397.
594.
562.
217.
269.
21.
0.
0.
574.
284,
15,
126.
535.
6 ,
0.
85.
1123.
243,
1030.
0.
29,
0.
23.
0.
107.
451.
75,
1309.
255.
0.
430.
225.
60.
260,
0.
91 .
44,
67.
686,
99,
25,
42.
205.
0,
77,
43.
13769.
1023,
2260.
&04.
1248,
2638.
109'?,
193.
84J -
277°,
2015.
158
-------
TABLE III-28
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt.XDry Wt.)
76.
0.
755.
2575.
16135,
4000.
37S3.
1460.
1812,
139,
0.
0.
3865,
1909,
9".
85 L,
3601 ,
37,
0,
572,
756 1 .
1634.
6937,
0,
193,
0,
1 b b *
0,
721,
3036.
504.
J2180,
171S.
0.
2897,
1 b 1 7 ,
406,
J7b2,
0.
£,10,
297,
447,
4621,
670,
1 70 ,
283,
1918,
0,
516,
287.
92700,
12273,
1 5216,
4067,
8405 ,
1 7750,
7396,
J297.
5660 ,
1 8710,
1918,
50.
0.
493.
1680,
1 0531 .
2611,
2469,
953,
1 182,
91,
0.
0,
1246,
65 ,
555,
2350,
24,
0.
373,
4935.
1066,
4527,
0,
126,
0,
101 ,
0,
471 .
1981 ,
329.
7949,
1121,
0,
1091.
990,
265,
1 143.
0.
398.
194.
293.
3016.
437,
111,
185,
12b"2,
0,
357,
187,
60500,
8010.
9951 ,
2654 ,
-548b,
11590,
4027,
847 ,
3694.
1221.1,
1252,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
58.
0.
576.
1964.
12306,
3051 .
2805,
1113.
1382.
106.
0.
0.
2940.
1456.
76.
649.
2746.
29.
0,
456.
5767.
1246.
5291,
0.
147.
0.
110,
0,
550.
2315.
384.
9290.
1310.
0.
2210.
1157,
310.
1336,
0.
465,
226,
342,
3524,
511 .
130.
216,
1463.
0.
393.
219.
707QO,
9360,
1 1605.
3101 .
6410,
13544,
0641 ,
99O,
4317,
14270,
J 463.
(Dry Wt.)
32.
0.
314.
1069,
6701.
1661 ,
1571,
606,
752.
53.
0,
0,
1605.
793.
41.
353.
1496,
16,
0,
237,
3140.
679,
288 L ,
0.
80.
0,
64.
0.
300,
1261,
209.
5059.
714,
0,
1203.
630.
169.
728.
0-,
253.
123.
186.
1919,
278.
71 ,
118,
796.
0.
214,
119,
38500.
5097.
6320,
16S9,
3491 ,
7375,
307.2,
539,
2351 .
7771 ,
"'96.
Total Hazardous Constituents (Drv Wt.)
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
12.
0.
119.
404.
2534.
628,
594,
284.
0.
0.
607.
300,
16.
134.
5
0,
0,
574.
284 .
15,
126,
535.
6.
0.
85,
1123,
243.
1030.
0.
29.
0.
23.
0.
107.
451.
75.
1309.
255,
0.
430.
225.
60.
260,
0.
91.
44,
67.
686.
99.
25.
42,
285,
0.
77,
43.
13769.
1823.
2260.
604.
1240.
2638.
1099.
193.
041.
2779.
285,
159
-------
TABLE 111-29
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
WINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I -
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt.XDry Wt.)
126.
0.
1247.
4249.
26631.
6602.
6243.
2409.
29VO.
230.
0.
0.
6379.
3151 .
164.
1404.
5*43.
62.
0.
944,
12480.
2697.
11449.
0.
318.
0.
255.
0.
1191.
5011.
832.
20103.
2836.
0.
4782.
2503.
670.
2892.
0.
1007.
489.
740.
7626.
U.05.
280.
467.
3165.
0.
851.
474.
114.
0.
1124.
3333.
24020.
5955.
5631.
2173.
2697.
207.
0.
0.
5754.
2842.
148,
12o6,
5361.
"J6.
0.
851.
11256.
2432.
10327.
0.
287.
0.
230.
0.
1074.
4519.
750.
19132.
2558.
0.
4313.
2258,
605,
2608.
0,
908.
441 ,
608,
6978.
997.
253.
421.
2855.
0.
768.
428.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
97.
0.
953.
3249.
20365.
5049.
4774.
1842.
2286.
176.
0.
0.
4878.
2410.
125.
1073.
4545.
47.
0.
722.
9543.
2062.
8755.
0.
243.
0.
195.
0.
910.
3832.
636.
15373.
2168.
0.
3657.
19 U.
513.
22 11.
0.
770.
374.
566.
5832.
845.
214.
357.
2420.
0.
651.
362.
(Dry Wt.)
70.
0.
693.
2361.
14795.
3660.
3469,
1338.
1661.
128.
0.
0.
3544.
1751 .
91.
780.
3302.
34.
0.
524.
6933.
1498.
6361.
0,
177.
0.
142.
0,
661 .
2784.
462.
11168.
1 575 .
0.
2657.
1391 .
372.
1607.
0,
559.
^72 *
411.
4237.
614,
156.
259.
1758.
0.
473.
263,
Flammable
Solvents
12,
0.
119.
404,
2534.
628.
594,
229,
284,
22 ,
0,
0.
607,
300.
L6,
134.
566.
6.
0,
90.
1187.
257,
1089,
0,
30.
0.
24,
0,
113.
477,
79.
1913,
270,
0,
455,
238,
64.
275.
0.
96,
47,
70.
726,
105.
27.
44,
301,
0.
ai.
45.
Heavy
Metals
2.0
0.
19.9
67.9
425.6
105.5
99.3
38.5
47.3
3.7
0.
0.
101.9
50.4
2.6
22 . 4
95.0
1 ,0
0.
15.1
199.4
43.1
183.0
0.
5.1
0.
4.1
0.
19.0
80,1
13.3
321.3
45.3
0.
76,4
40.0
10.7
46,2
0,
16.1
7.8
11.3
121 .9
17.7
4.5
7.5
50,6
0.
13.6
7.6
Acids/Alkali
Oils jjolution
17.3
0.
170.8
582.0
3647.6
904.3
855.1
330.0
409.5
31.5
0.
0.
373.8
431,6
22.5
192.3
814,0
8.5
0.
129.3
1709.3
369.4
1568. I
0.
43.6
0.
35,0
0.
163.1
686.3
113.9
2753.5
338.4
0.
655.0
342.9
91.8
396.1
0.
137.9
67.0
101.4
1044.5
151.4
38.4
64.0
433.5
0.
116.6
64.9
.3
0.
3,1
10.5
65.8
16.3
15.4
6.0
7.4
.6
0.
0.
15.8
7.8
.4
3.5
14.7
» °
0,
2.3
30.8
6.7
28.3
0.
.8
0.
.6
0.
2.9
12.4
2.1
49.7
7.0
0.
11.3
6.2
1 ,7
7,1
0.
2.5
1.2
1 ,8
18.8
2.7
.7
1 .2
7.8
0.
2,1
1.2
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindings
.5
0.
5.4
18.4
115.6
28.7
27.1
10.5
13.0
1 ,0
0.
0.
27.7
13.7
. 7
0.1
25.3
.3
0.
4.1
54.2
11.7
49. 7
0.
1,4
0.
I .1
0,
5,2
21.7
3.6
87.2
12.3
0.
20.8
10.9
2.9
12.5
0.
4.4
2.1
3.2
33.1
4.8
1.2
2.0
13.7
0.
3.7
2.1
11.
0.
112.
382.
2397.
594.
562.
217.
269.
21.
0.
0.
574.
234.
15.
126.
535.
6.
0.
85.
1123.
243.
1030.
0.
29.
0.
23.
0,
107.
451.
75.
1809.
255.
0.
430,
225.
60.
260.
0.
91,
44.
67.
686.
99.
25.
42.
285.
0.
77.
43.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
153000. 138000, 117000.
35000.
2445.0 20956.0
378.0
6o4.0 13769,
20256.
251 14.
6712.
13872.
29310.
12208.
2141.
9341.
30880.
3165.
18270,
2265?,
6054.
12512.
26436.
11011 .
1931 .
8425,
27853.
2855.
15490.
19205.
5133.
10608.
22413.
9335 .
1638.
7143.
23614.
2420.
11253.
13952.
3729.
7707.
16233.
6732.
1190.
5190,
17156,
1758.
1927,
2390.
639,
1320.
2789,
1 162.
204.
88V .
2938.
30d .
323.7
401.3
107,3
221.7
463,4
195,1
34.2
149.3
493,5
50.6
2774
3439
919
1900
4014
1672
293
1279
4229
433
.4
.i.!
.3
.1
.5
.1
.3
.4
.6
.5
50
62
16
34
72
30
5
23
-76
7
.0
,0
,6
.3
.4
O
.3
.1
.3
.8
37
109
29
60
127
53
9
40
134
13
.9
.0
,1
"5
,2
.0
.3
. 5
.0
,7
1323
2260
604
1248
2638
1099
193
841
2779
205
160
-------
trends within each 4-digit SIC classification, based on 1967 and 1972
Census of Manufactures [5] data, provided the production employee
estimates for 1975, 1977, and 1983.
The total quantity of current process wastes in SIC 355 and SIC
357 is 269,000 kkg/yr (307,000 tons/yr) on a wet basis 236,400 kkg/yr
(260,600 tons/yr) on a dry basis and 90,700 kkg/yr (100,000 tons/yr)
on a wet basis, 62,200 kkg/yr (68,600 tons/yr) on a dry basis,
respectively. Based on engineering judgment, the accuracy of the
waste quantity estimates are probably correct to 4^ 30 percent.
The basic unit used to calculate the various national, regional
and state quantities for total industry waste, process waste streams,
potentially hazardous waste streams and potentially hazardous
constituents was the average weight of all wastes per process area
employee generated within the six significant process areas. The
reasons for grouping all wastes from a process together for
quantification purposes are two-fold. First, the most commonly
available and reliable waste generation estimates were those for
total waste volumes in discrete process areas. Some estimates were
available for specific waste materials, such as solvents, within a
process area. In general these material estimates are limited in
coverage and accuracy so are considered useful only in apportioning
the total process area waste quantities ("waste stream" as used here)
to their various material components. The waste streams as
identified by the process area from which they are generated, the
typical waste stream component materials, and waste generation
factors for waste streams and components are listed in Table 111-30.
The second reason for grouping process wastes according to
process area was that waste segregation in typical plants for both
industries is practiced, if at all, according to process area, not
according to waste material. The national total of waste streams
generated by each manufacturing process was estimated using the
following expression:
National waste quantity = (No, of processes used
in the industry) x (Average number of productions
employees per process) x (Average amount of waste
generated per year for each production employee).
The number of processes used in SIC 355 and 357 were taken from
Table II-7, and the average numbers of employees per process were
calculated from data compiled during the plant surveys. The average
waste generation factor for each process was also calculated from the
compiled plant survey data base.
Allocations of process wastes to the states were made as
161
-------
TABLE 111-30
WASTE GENERATION FACTORS
Waste Stream
*Machlne Shop
*Heat Treating
*Electroplating
*Coating
Ferrous and Non-
Ferrous Foundry
Components
Coolants
Sweepings &
Grindings
Solvents
Quench Oils
Cyanides
Acids/Alkalies
Heavy Metal
Sludges
Solvents
Acids/Alkalies
Paint Sludge
Solvents
Foundry Sand
Plastic Molding Scrap Resin
Waste Generation Factor
kkg/yr - Dept. emp.
1.29
1.25
0.81
0.85
0.14
1.00
1.88
0.64
1.00
0.55
0.50
62.0
0.12
Average
Number of
Production Employees
PU Process
SIC355
16
26
44
14
24
SIC357
68
74
118
33
55
*Potentially hazardous waste source
Source: Contractor estimates
162
-------
follows:
State waste quantity = (National waste quantity) x
(Percent of production workers in each state in
SIC 355 and 357).
The percentage of production workers in each state for each SIC
code was derived primarily from 1972 Census data.
Metal foundries — ferrous and nonferrous — constitute the
largest process waste stream in SIC 355 generating 173,000 kkg/yr
(190,000 tons/yr) and the smallest waste stream is electroplating at
3700 kkg/yr (4100 tons/yr) — all on a wet weight basis. Although
ferrous and nonferrous foundry operations are not typically found in
SIC 355 plants, Table III-9 shows that the quantity of waste
generated in casting operations is significant, constituting nearly
two-thirds of the total process wastes of the industry.
Electroplating wastes are relatively small both because of the small
number of electroplating processes utilized in SIC 355 plants and the
small size of the processes employed. Machine shop wastes are
significant for precisely the reverse reasons. Machining is one of
the typical processes found in SIC 355 plants and some of these
operations are quite large.
Machining shops account for the largest waste stream in SIC 357,
39,000 kkg/yr (43,000 tons/yr) wet weight and the smallest in this
industry is coating at 3500 kkg/yr (3800 tons/yr) wet weight. The
machine shop is a typical process in SIC 357 plants while coating is
not. In addition, many of the coating operations involve only hand
application or small dry-wall spray booth operations which do not
generate the sludge produced by wet-wall booths. Electroplating
wastes are significant because of the relatively large size of these
operations as employed in SIC 357 plants. Although ferrous and
nonferrous foundries are not typical in SIC 357 plants, the total
waste is significant because of the high quantity of foundry sand
generated in casting operations. Foundry wastes are not considered
potentially hazardous.
Each waste stream in SIC 355 with the exception of
electroplating and plastics molding is larger than its counterpart in
SIC 357. Some of the reasons which explain this have been discussed
earlier — i.e., there are more plants in SIC 355 than in SIC 357.
In addition, SIC 357 employs more and larger electroplating shops
than SIC 355 plants and plastics molding operations are very rare in
SIC 355. On the other hand, many of the products manufactured in SIC
355 are much larger in size than typical SIC 357 products and
operations common to both would tend to be on a larger scale in SIC
355.
163
-------
The national waste generation estimates for SIC 355 and 357 show
a decrease between 1975 and 1983. This is concomitant with an
overall reduction projected in production employees. These
projections were developed by the contractor based on 1958-1972
Census statistics, the U.S. Industrial Outlook for 1973 and 1974, and
experience factors. This indication that these industries are in a
decline is supported by the plant survey experience. Many of the
plants contacted reported that they were in the process of phasing
out or reducing production of some SIC 355 and SIC 357 products due
to the the prevailing economic climate. The only industry in SIC 355
that has expanded in recent years is SIC 3553, woodworking machinery
manufacture. The only growth industry in SIC 357 is SIC 3573,
electronic computer equipment manufacture.
The reduction in estimates of national waste totals is more
sizeable in SIC 355 than in 357 between 1975 and 1983. This is
largely due to the fact that the decline in SIC 357 is balanced to a
considerable degree by the explosive expansion of SIC 3573,
electronic computing equipment manufacture.
The 1983 national total incorporates the effects of the 1972
amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The Act
requires designated industries to meet one level of limitations on
the pollutant parameters of their effluents by 1977 and another,
usually more stringent level, by 1983. These reductions may, in some
cases, be brought about by process change or internal methods such as
water recycle. The latter practice is anticipated to some extent in
the case of electroplating effluents and acid and alkaline cleaning
solutions. However, regardless of whether these effluents are
treated for reuse or are treated for discharge in order to meet the
regulatory requirements, larger quantities of sludge will be
generated which will require land disposal. Thus, the 1983 total
includes material which is generally disposed of today by discharging
effluent to sanitary sewers. These estimated quantities have a
greater impact on projected national totals in SIC 357 than in SIC
355 because the SIC 357 category plants use larger volumes of water
than SIC 355. The biggest water user in these industries is SIC
3573, electronic computer equipment manufacture, which uses on the
average four times as much water as the second largest water user,
SIC 3552, textile machinery [29].
Estimates of Potentially Hazardous Waste Quantities
Quantifications of hazardous constituents in the wastes of the
SIC 355 and 357 industries are based on plant survey data and
laboratory analyses conducted on waste samples obtained from surveyed
plants. These constituents contaminate the nonhazardous constituents
of a larger body of wastes, thereby rendering the whole waste stream
164
-------
potentially hazardous. Thus, since the hazardous constituents are
distributed throughout the waste stream and are not segregated in
waste handling, the quantity of potentially hazardous wastes, as
defined previously, is in most cases identical to the total waste
stream. However, in the 1983 estimates, the quantities of total
waste become greater than the potentially hazardous portion because
the total waste includes suspended solids, currently discharged in
plant effluents, which are not potentially hazardous.
The dry weight quantities of potentially hazardous wastes are
greater than the dry weight quantities of hazardous constituents,
because hazardous and nonhazardous constituents are often chemically
bound together.
In SIC 355 and 357, the largest potentially hazardous waste is
machine shop wastes, 79,000 kkg/yr (87,000 ton/yr) for SIC 355 and
39,000 kkg/yr (43,000 ton/yr) for SIC 357. These quantities are on a
wet weight basis. This is because of the prevalence and size of
machine shops and related processes in these industries. The largest
hazardous constituent in machine shop wastes is metal sweepings and
grindings which is followed by flammable solvents. In SIC 355,
sweepings and grindings, which are found only in the machine shop
waste stream, are the largest hazardous constituent, and the largest
hazardous constituent in SIC 357, up until 1983, is flammable
solvents generated in the machine shop, electroplating, and coating
waste streams. One of the smallest volume hazardous constituents,
heavy metals, includes quantities of cadmium, chromium, and lead.
The 1983 effluent limitations will necessitate greater removal
of heavy metals, oil, and cyanides from plant wastewater effluents.
The largest hazardous constituent affected by the proposed 1983
regulations will be oil as shown in Tables 111-20 and 111-23. It is
estimated that the quantity of oils for disposal will be increased
two and a half times in SIC 355 and seven times in SIC 357 due to the
impact of the 1983 effluent guidelines. This will result in waste
oil becoming the largest hazardous constituent in SIC 357 in 1983.
Estimates of state and EPA regional totals are presented for SIC
355 in Appendix I and for SIC 357 in Appendix J. These are based on
the production employee distribution by state found in the 1972
Census data [5], This distribution is assumed to be the same in 1977
and 1983 and therefore is used to determine state quantities in those
years. The states which have the most plants and production
employees are considered to have the largest quantities of total
process and potentially hazardous wastes generated within their
borders. These appendices, along with Tables 111-24 through 111-29,
show that in SIC 355, Ohio has the greatest process waste generation
at 26,851 kkg/yr (29,598 tons/yr) on a wet basis. The next largest
process waste and potentially hazardous waste quantities are
estimated to occur in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Illinois,
165
-------
California, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Wisconsin,
respectively. These states are generally considered to be highly
industrialized. Two states — Alaska and Idaho — were considered to
have no SIC 355 manufacturing operations based on Census data.
Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and
Utah all have less than 187 kkg/yr (206 tons/yr) of total process
wastes generated by their respective industrial operations in SIC
355.
EPA Region V has the greatest amount of process and potentially
hazardous waste generated at 78,948 kkg/yr (87,025 tons/yr) and
28,175 kkg/yr (31,058 tons/yr). Region V contains Ohio (which has
the largest SIC 355 waste generation of any state), Indiana,
Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan. EPA Region IV,
consisting of the Southeastern states — Kentucky, Tennessee, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida
— has the next largest quantities of process wastes and potentially
hazardous wastes at 44,679 kkg/yr (49,250 tons/yr) and 15,945 kkg/yr
(17,576 tons/yr) on a wet basis, respectively. The smallest
quantities of process wastes and potentially hazardous wastes are
generated in EPA Region VIII, which consists of Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado. This region
accumulates 1246 kkg/yr (1373 tons/yr) of process wastes and 445
kkg/yr (491 tons/yr) of potentially hazardous wastes on a wet basis.
The current distribution of SIC 355 wastes among the states and
EPA regions is not expected to change through 1983.
In SIC 357, California has the most wastes with 16,831 kkg/yr
(18,553 tons/yr) of total process wastes and 11,609 kkg/yr (12,797
tons/yr) of total potentially hazardous wastes. New York has the
next highest totals with 12,706 kkg/yr (14,006 tons/yr) of process
waste and 8764 kkg/yr (9661 tons/yr) of potentially hazardous wastes
on a wet weight basis. A number of states are thought to have no
plants which manufacture office computing and accounting machinery
based on Census data 15], These are Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine,
Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Rhode Island, and West
Virginia.
EPA Region IX has the greatest quantities of SIC 357 process
waste at 19,517 kkg/yr (21,514 tons/yr) and potentially hazardous
wastes at 13,461 kkg/yr (14,838 tons/yr), all of which are on a wet
basis. Region IX is made up of California (which generates 86
percent of the SIC 357 wastes), Nevada, Arizona and Hawaii. Region
IX is followed closely by EPA Region V which accumulates 18,525
kkg/yr (20,420 tons/yr) of total process waste and 12,778 kkg/yr
(14,085 tons/yr) of potentially hazardous wastes. The smallest
amounts of potentially hazardous wastes are found in Regions VII and
X at 934 kkg/yr (1030 tons/yr) and 1380 kkg/yr (1521 tons/yr) on a
wet basis, respectively.
166
-------
Residues From Pollution Abatement Equipment
Part of the process wastes generated by the special industrial
machinery and office, computing, and accounting machines
manufacturing industries are from air and water pollution control
devices as shown in Table 111-31. In the foundry process,
approximately 1.5 percent of the wastes generated are from collected
dust from furnaces stack gas. This amounts to 2600 kkg/yr (2900
tons/yr) of dust in SIC 355, and 400 kkg/yr (400 tons/yr) in SIC 357.
These materials have not been classified as potentially hazardous.
Much of the electroplating wastes originate from water pollution
abatement devices such as clarifiers. About 75 percent of the
electroplating wastes generated in 1975 were generated in this
manner, and it is expected that roughly 90 percent of the wastes in
1983 will stem from wastewater treatment operations as a result of
improved imposed effluent guidelines. During 1975 in SIC 355, about
2800 kkg/yr (3100 tons/yr) of total process waste resulting from
wastewater treatment, all of which is considered potentially
hazardous, was generated. By 1983, 7200 kkg/yr (7900 tons/yr) of
process waste from wastewater treatment will accrue. Approximately
3000 kkg/yr (3300 tons/yr) of this volume are potentially hazardous.
In SIC 357, about 16,500 kkg/yr (18,200 tons/yr) of process waste,
classified as potentially hazardous, is generated from water
pollution control equipment. In 1983, the process waste will
increase to about 27,000 kkg/yr (29,800 tons/yr) which will contain
17,300 kkg/yr (19,100 tons/yr) of potentially hazardous waste.
Part of the coating waste stream is made up of sludge from water
pollution control equipment and from discarded air filters from dry
wall paint booths. In SIC 355, these wastes will constitute 1000
kkg/yr (1100 tons/yr) and 1300 kkg/yr (1400 tons/yr) in 1975 and
1983, respectively. The residues from pollution control equipment in
SIC 357 are estimated at 400 kkg/yr (400 tons/yr) in 1975 and 1700
kkg/yr (1900 tons/yr) in 1983.
The wastes from the other manufacturing processes in these
industries generally do not have air or water pollution abatement
equipment. This applies to machine shops, heat treating operations,
assembly, plastics molding operations, and stamping, blanking, and
forming operations.
167
-------
TABLE 111-31
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION FROM AIR AND WATER
POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES
(kkg/yr)
1975
Foundries-Ferrous
and Nonferrous
Electroplating
Coating (D)
Total
1977
Foundries-Ferrous
and Nonferrous
Electroplating^8)
Coating
1983
(D)
Total
Foundries-Ferrous' '
and Nonferrous
Electroplating(C)
Coating
(E)
Total
Process
Waste
2600
2800
1000
6400
2400
2800
900
6100
Total
1800
7200
1300
10,300
Potentially
Hazardous
Waste
0
2800
1000
3800
0
2800
900
3700
0
3000
900
3900
Total Potentially
Process Hazardous
Waste Waste
400
16,500
400
17,300
300
16,500
400
17,200
300
27,000
1,700
29,000
0
16,500
400
16,900
0
16,500
400
16,900
0
17,300
1,700
19,000
Notes: (A) Dry weight = weight weight. (B) Dry weight - 0.40 x wet weight.
(C) Dry weight = 0.62 x wet weight. (D) Dry weight = 0.77 x wet weight.
(E) Dry weight = 0.85 x wet weight.
168
-------
SECTION IV
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
This section describes the technologies utilized by plants in
SIC 355 and 357 to treat and dispose of potentially hazardous wastes
generated in the manufacture of special industrial machinery and
office, computing, and accounting machines, respectively. Current
treatment and disposal technologies are developed for the four basic
process waste streams deemed potentially hazardous. The processes
involved are: (1) machine shop operations, including tool and die
shops; stamping, blanking and forming operations; and plate and
structural fabrication; (2) heat treating operations; (3)
electroplating operations; and (4) coating operations,, Descriptions
of these processes and their waste quantities and characteristics are
presented in Section III. This section does not attempt to describe
the treatment and disposal methods applied to process wastes
considered to be nonhazardous by the contractor.
Three levels of technology are indicated for each of the
potentially hazardous waste streams. These are based on the most
prevalent industrywide practice (Level I); the best method presently
used which is amenable to more widespread use (Level II); and the
disposal practice required to provide adequate health and
environmental protection (Level III).
No differentiation is made between treatment and disposal
technology use by plants in SIC 355 and 357. Each of the four
potentially hazardous waste streams identified above are found in
both SIC 355 and 357 manufacturing establishments. The plant survey
data showed that the handling, treatment and disposal practices used
in the manufacturing establishments of both SIC 355 and SIC 357 are
identical. Both industries generally rely on private contractors to
haul away and dispose of potentially hazardous wastes in offsite
sanitary landfills. A discussion of onsite versus offsite treatment
and disposal practices is provided in this section along with a
description of the operations of private disposal contractors. The
treatment and disposal practices of typical plants in SIC 355 and 357
are described, as are the three levels of treatment and disposal
technology for each potentially hazardous waste.
PRESENT WASTE HANDLING AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Several types of potentially hazardous wastes generated by
manufacturing plants in SIC 355 and 357 are handled and treated,
169
-------
either onsite or by contractors at offsite locations. Onsite
treatment will necessarily increase in the foreseeable future as the
Federal limitations discussed in Section III are imposed on the
pollutant constituents of the liquid wastes generated by these
industrieso
The specific wastes currently receiving some form of treatment,
in the surveyed plants include cooling, cutting, quenching,
lubricating, and hydraulic oils, organic solvents, electroplating
baths, and acid and alkaline cleaning solutions. Physical,
mechanical, and chemical treatment methods are all employed as
applicable. No biological treatment is practiced in the SIC 355 and
357 plants or envisioned under EPA's effluent limitations and
standards since no organic wastes other than oil and solvents are
generated.
MachiningWaste
In many machine shops in the SIC 355 and 357 categories,
coolants and cutting oils are reused until they are too degraded, as
discussed in Section III, to be suitable for further recirculation
and are then discarded. However, the surveys disclosed that in six
plants out of the 33 visited, coolants and cutting oils are
completely or almost completely recirculated. This is accomplished
in most cases by filtering the oil, sewering small quantities of
sludge, and disposing of the filters in sanitary landfills; in some
instances, both the sludge and filters are landfilled. In one
surveyed plant, cutting oil is reclaimed through the use of a
centrifuge, and small volume residue is incinerated. The management
of three plants claimed that their cutting fluids are completely
recirculated in their machining operations.
Spent lubricating and hydraulic oils are filtered in one plant
prior to burning them with fuel oil in the plant boiler. This
practice is also reported in use in plants of a very large
corporation with multi-plant operations in both SIC 355 and 357.
Only the sludge remains for disposal off-sLte in a sanitary landfill.
Two plant spokesmen reported that their disposal contractors reclaim
cutting oils and quenching oils prior to selling them as fuels or
fuel additives.
The treatment of organic solvents — either onsite or offsite —
for the purpose of reusing them was not found to be as prevalent in
the surveyed plants as might have been expected based on experience
with other types of industrial operations such as the paint and
coatings industry. However, two instances of contractor recovery and
three of onsite recovery of spent solvents from machine shop,
coating, or heat treating operations were reported. It is not known
whether this represents typical distribution of solvent recovery in
170
-------
SIC 355 and 357 plants. The large manufacturer referred to above
indicates use of on-site stills for solvent reclamation, but this
process would not be economical for the very small plants which
constitute a large majority of SIC 355 and 357 operations as
discussed in Section II. In some cases, the quantities of discarded
solvents are so minimal that they are absorbed by cleaning cloths
which are laundered so that the solvents do not constitute a liquid
or semi-liquid waste. In others, the solvents appear in trace
quantities only in discarded oils. In such cases as these,
segregation for reclamation even by decantation is not practical.
No treatment is generally afforded to sweepings and grindings
waste other than separating out large pieces of metal suitable for
offsite scrap salvage by others. As noted in Section III, scrap
metal is not considered a waste.
Electroplating Wastes
Liquid waste equalization and metals recovery applied to
electroplating as well as heat treating and other metal finishing
wastes account for the bulk of treatment which occurs on-site in SIC
355 and 357 plants. This is true for several reasons. One is that
spent plating, etching, and similar baths and rinses may contain
metals which are very costly. Therefore, even though treatment is
expensive, it is more economical in some cases than discarding metals
such as copper, chrome, gold, silver, and rhodium contained in the
wastes. Another reason is that the surface finishing wastes account
for most of the liquid wastes generated in SIC 355 and 357 plants and
they are most conveniently disposed of by discharging them to a
sanitary sewer. However, if the heavy metal content is not removed
or considerably reduced, the metals could damage mechanical equipment
in sewage treatment plants and kill the microorganisms used in
biological treatment. Discharge of wastewater effluents to receiving
waters presently requires heavy metal removal to meet water quality
criteria and standards, and, in the future, stricter effluent
limitations and standards will likely be applied. The third reason
for on-site treatment of wastewaters is that many finishing
operations and heat treating involve the use of cyanide salts which,
because of their high degree of toxicity, should be destroyed before
disposal.
The electroplating wastes of seven of the nine plants surveyed
which engage in this process receive some sort of on-site treatment.
In two cases, these waste streams also included etchants. Some
plants practice some degree of segregation according to the nature of
the waste, although segregation does not appear to be a universal
practice. Most treatment of electroplating waste can be considered
batch treatment though some qualified as semi-continuous.
171
-------
The electroplating area in one of the surveyed plants is
equipped with an ammonium hydroxide floor drain system to neutralize
cyanide spills which may occur. Hypochlorite salts are used to
destroy cyanides in the treatment system, although chlorine is used
for this purpose in some other plants, and in one, electrolytic
destruction of cyanide is practiced. Under proper conditions,
chlorine will react with a cyanide salt, such as sodium cyanide, to
form carbon dioxide, sodium chloride, nitrogen, and water. This
treatment is feasible for plants of all sizes. An estimated 25
percent of electroplating operations in the subject industries
practice cyanide destruction.
The degree of treatment of these wastes and the size of the
equipment is directly related to waste quantity and strength. The
smaller plants have found it more economical to drum the quantities
they produce and have them hauled, untreated, to off-site sanitary
landfillso In any size plant where the concentrations of metals are
so dilute as to make recovery of them unecomomic and the waste stream
is acceptable for discharge, this is the natural course pursued.
Wastewater treatment plants as described above would not be
economically feasible for many of the plants in the subject
industries due to the large proportion of relatively small plants and
their correspondingly due saiall waste volumes.
Some less complete treatments of electroplating or etching
wastes were encountered. One involves reclamation of a ferric
chloride solution through precipitation to recover its copper
content. In another, dilute chrome and cyanide rinses are subjected
to neutralization and pressure filtration with the filtrate going to
a sanitary sewer and the filter cake hauled to a sanitary landfill.
In many instances acid and alkaline wastes are neutralized
before discharge to sewers, constituting the general practice of the
industry. In one case, 30 percent sulfuric acid bath solutions,
fluoroboric acid, and hydrochloric acid are diluted with rinse water
before discharge, and in others the solutions were sewered apparently
without treatment.
Heat Treating Wastes
As noted earlier, cyanide wastes from heat treating operations
undergo chemical destruction in about 25 percent of the plants
generating this waste. Where both heat treating and electroplating
are utilized in the same plant and both employ cyanides (roughly 50
plants in the subject industries) common practice appears to be that
the liquid cyanide wastes from both are combined and destroyed in the
same treatment process. However, based on extremely limited survey
data, it appears that where cyanide is used only in heat treating,
172
-------
contractor treatment or disposal may occur more frequently (perhaps
in 75-100 plants). Off-site contractor landfill is typically applied
for untreated cyanides in liquid form, but cyanides in solid or
semisolid residues may be chemically destroyed by offsite
incineration.
Painting Wastes
Only one plant reported treatment of waste paint. The sludge
from the water cascade of a wet-wall spray booth is sent to the
cyanide equalization tank on the premises. However, this practice is
not considered common. Waste solvents, paint sludge, air filters,
and oils, which are the main constituents of paint waste, are
generally combined in drums or waste contained with no treatment.
New Developments
The plant surveys revealed that the following hazardous waste
treatment methods are being considered for future use by one or more
manufacturing establishments:
1. Chromium plating waste removal by lime precipitation
2. Acid/alkali plating waste neutralization
3. Solvent reclaiming by activated carbon adsorption
A wide range was found in the degree of sophistication of waste
disposal practices in the surveyed plants. This degree of
sophistication is strongly related to plant size and is increased in
some cases by corporate policies toward environmental protection.
For example, managers of plants with extensive treatment facilities
pointed out that they have corporate support in substantial
expenditures for environmental controls-support which is made
possible by the large size of the company. This support is not
available to the small one-plant company which must cope with the
same types of wastes but in smaller volumes. Plant location in terms
of highly urbanized areas as opposed to small towns is another
determinant in waste disposal practices, and is probably related to
the extent to which official supervision over such matters is
practiced — i.e., the more primative practices of on-site land
disposal occurring in non-urban locations are not likely to be
permitted in metropolitan areas.
The degree of segregation of waste streams is also widely varied
from plant to plant. This is also largely a function of size. For
example, a small plant is likely to place all waste oils in one drum,
all waste solvents in another drum, and all process solid wastes
generated on the site in one trash container regardless of which
process generated them. In addition, all oils and solvents to be
disposed of may find their way ultimately into the same drum,
173
-------
depending upon relative quantities. Also, the amount of these
materials discarded is so small in some cases that they may be
combined with the solid wastes for disposal.
This would not be likely to occur in a large plant where
reclamation and recycle are more economically feasible. In the
larger plants, the various different elements of waste streams as
they are defined in this report — all wastes emanating from a
separate manufacturing process — are generally segregated as waste
oils, waste solvents, solid wastes, etc. This is due to one or more
factors — (1) to facilitate recovery of each separate type of
material; (2) to avoid dilution which would hinder recovery; (3) to
avoid accidents in the case of more exotic wastes; or (4) to
accommodate separate pick-up by specialized disposal or reclamation
contractors.
One of the surveyed plants used nine waste contractors: two
different contractors purchase 90 and 10 percent of a cupric oxide
stream for recovery of the copper; precious metal baths are sold for
refining to four separate companies on a bid basis; floor sweepings
and general scrap are collected by a disposal company for
landfilling; spray booth paint sludge is hauled to landfill by
another company; metal sludges from the chemical treatment system are
landfilled by still another.
The number of contractors involved ranges down to none where
waste quantities are small and unsupervised on-site land disposal
occurs. There are insufficient plant data available to correlate
number of contractors utilized to any given range of plant size,
however.
Machining Waste Disposal
Contractor delivery to off-site sanitary landfills appears to be
the most common disposal technology for coolants, cutting oils, and
the small intermittent quantities of lubricating, hydraulic, and
quenching oils discarded. About 1000 plants are estimated to utilize
this practice. Six surveyed plants reported contractor landfill
disposal of waste oils generated by machine shops and other machining
operations, and one reported this disposal means for quenching oil
from heat treating. In another instance, the contractor's method of
disposal of quenching oil was not known to the plant as was the case
in the disposal of three coolant and cutting oil disposal
contractors. These are probably landfill operations as well as small
local companies. Only one instance of contractor incineration was
reported for oils. Off-site sanitary landfilling of waste oils from
machine shops was the reported technology for one-third of the
surveyed plants.
174
-------
Other methods reported for disposing of oils are:
Completely or almost all recirculated
(Coolants, Cutting oils) 4 plants
Nevel discarded (quenchants) 2
Contractor reclamation 2 "
Sent out with metal wastes 3 "
On-site land disposal 5
Sewered 4
Used as fuel on-site 4
Contractor road oiling 2
Given away to employees 1
Some plants employ more than one of these technologies.
Metal sweepings and grindings also are apparently most often
discarded in sanitary landfills off-site by contractors although only
four plants reported this practice directly. However, dusts and
grindings most often go out of the plant in waste oils or are added
to the general trash for solid waste disposal. The most prevalent
disposal practice for metal sweepings and grindings is off-site
sanitary landfill disposal by contractor whether the waste is mixed
with other wastes or segregated.
This also applies to spent organic solvents from machining and
painting operations. Six contractor landfill operations were
reported along with one instance in which the disposal technology was
unknown. Two contractor incineration operations were reported.
On-site land disposal is practiced at three plants,, In two of these
cases solvents were mixed with discarded oils.
Electroplating, Waste Disposal
Contractor disposal in sanitary landfills also appears to be
prevalent practice for heavy metal sludges generated from
electroplating operations with six plants reporting the practice. In
one specialized case in SIC 357, 2300 liters (600 gal.) per year of
an arsenic/selenium alloy sludge is placed in sealed drums for
contractor burial off-site. In one other case, the sludge is
sewered.
The primary means of treatment and disposal for acid and
alkaline cleaners appears to be on-site neutralization and sewering
to municipal sewage treatment plants. Only two instances of
contractor disposal in sanitary landfills were reported for cleaners
— one direct and one after treatment.
Heat Treating Waste Disposal
Waste oils and cyanides from heat treating operations are most
175
-------
commonly deposited in off-site sanitary landfills by private
contractors. About 150 plants in SIC's 355 and 357 are estimated to
use this technology. In addition, about 50 plants generating solid
cyanide wastes arrange for private contractors to burn their wastes
in off-site incinerators.
Painting Waste Disposal
Contractor disposal in sanitary landfills is the predominant
disposal technique for paint wastes generated by SIC 355 and 357
plants. This is in accord with the findings on disposal of paint
wastes in a previous EPA study 155], involving practices in the paint
industry itself and factory-applied coatings operations. Thirteen
SIC 355 and 357 plants out of 33 surveyed report this practice.
However, three plants indicated utilization of contractor
incinceration operations, and two dump their paint wastes on-site.
QN-SITE VS. OFF-SITE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
The principal methods for on-site waste disposal discovered in
the plant surveys involve burning of waste oils as boiler fuel after
filtering, if necessary, which occurs in three plants. No on-site,
supervised land disposal operations were encountered,, Where on-site
land disposal of oil, waste metals of various sizes, waste paint, and
in one case, solvents, takes place, it is usually "dumped" on the
soil. In addition, at one establishment paint wastes are placed in
an alley behind the plant to be washed away by rain; in another case,
oils are spread on the driveway to reduce dust. These on-site
disposal methods are not considered environmentally acceptable.
There is no indication that any of the plants surveyed plan to
change their disposal mode with regard to on-site or off-site
location in the foreseeable future. Thus, no significant increase in
on-site disposal practices, either using incineration or landfills,
is expected through 1983. No spokesman discussed changes in this
regard relating to increased wastes requiring land disposal or
incineration engendered by 1977 and 1983 effluent limitations and
standards.
It is estimated that 90,800 kkg/yr (100,100 tons/yr) and 63,600
kkg/yr (70,100 tons/yr) of potentially hazardous wastes undergo
off-site disposal at the hands of private contractors in SIC 355 and
SIC 357, respectively. This represents approximately 90 percent of
the total potentially hazardous waste generated by the industries as
shown in Table IV-1.
SAFEGUARDS USED IN DISPOSAL
At each of the plants surveyed the question was asked: "Are
176
-------
TABLE IV-1
ONSITE AND OFFSITE DISPOSAL OF
POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTES
1975 WASTE QUANTITIES, kkg/yr.
(Wet Weight)
SIC 355 SIC 357
Machine
Electroplating
Heat Treating
Painting
TOTALS
Onsite
8,000
400
800
1,000
10,200
Oftsite
71,000
3,300
7,500
9,000
90,800
Onsite
4,000
2,200
600
300
7,100
Offsite
35,000
19,800
5,600
3,200
63,600
(1) Includes wastes from tool and die shops; stamping; blanking, and
forming shops; and plate and structural fabrication operations.
(2) The wet and dry weight factors used in deriving these waste
quantities are approximate and may vary with given manufacturing
operations and with any waste dewatering systems used.
Source: Contractor estimates
177
-------
potentially hazardous wastes handled or treated differently from
other solid or semi-solid wastes?" Twenty responded that they are
not, although in many of these cases the spokesman did not consider
any of the wastes produced potentially hazardous.
The thirteen affirmative answers were based on the following
factors:
1. All chemical wastes and plating sludges are handled by a
specialized contractor.
2. The metallic content of solvents, paint sludges, and other
chemical wastes are handled by different contractors from those
disposing of innocuous wastes.
3. Spent coolants are separately drummed prior to disposal.
4. Ferric chloride solution is reclaimed by copper
precipitation; acid solution is then diluted before disposal.
5. Use private contractor for disposal of chemical sludges;
sealed drums and burial for arsenic selenium alloy sludge.
6. Cyanide is placed in labelled drums and handled by a
separate contractor.
7. Machine shop coolant is discarded on-site.
8. Oils are drummed separately from other wastes.
9. Used chemicals are collected and separated by a hazardous
material distribution system for disposal; treatment of
electroplating wastes is practiced; hazardous parts of scrapped
machines are removed and handled separately; approximately 30
drums/year of old capacitors containing PCB's are collected and
stored; 2 drums/year of mercury are drummed and handled separately.
10. Oils and solvents are sent to landfill, while other
nonhazardous solid wastes go to a scavenger service; some metallic
wastes with oil residues are disposed of through. a separate
contractor.
11. Liquids and solids are removed and disposed of by licensed
disposal companies.
12. Dilute plating chrome and cyanide rinses are reduced,
oxidized, neutralized, and pressure filtered before discharge to
sewer; concentrated plating and heat treated wastes go to a certified
disposal contractor; paint and stripping wastes, ink-solvent wastes,
and other paint related materials also go to a certified disposal
178
-------
contractor.
13. Make-up supply for plating baths are provided by two
drag-out catching tanks; copper solution is sent to a contractor for
reclamation; gold rinses are countercurrent; heat treating, quenching
oil and sodium cyanide are drummed and put in a general container for
pickup.
It can be seen that there is a broad interpretation of which
wastes are hazardous and of what constitutes "different" handling.
On the basis of this information, it is not possible to establish the
norm or the average of safeguards utilized by the plants in this
industry in handling potentially hazardous wastes or the number of
plants in which each of these safeguards are used.
PRIVATE CONTRACTORS AND SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
It was specifically reported in only one instance that a plant's
own trucks haul potentially hazardous wastes to a disposal site. It
is understood that some of them make occasional and unscheduled trips
to haul nonhazardous trash to a municipal disposal area, but it was
not suggested that these loads contain the wastes defined as
hazardous in this report with any frequency. Thus, although the
plant surveys were very limited in number, it is felt that they
establish the fact that the majority of the wastes generated by SIC
355 and 357 plants (about 90 percent) are carried away from the plant
by private contractors.
A list of 52 contractors reported by the plants visited is shown
in Appendix K. Their methods and capabilities vary quite widely.
Sanitary landfill disposal is listed for 23 operations although this
is not known to be accurate in every case. Only one operation is
known to be a secured landfill. Six of the disposal contractors
listed in Appendix K have incineration facilities; three reclaim
solvents and three reclaim oil; 15 others recover metals. While some
of the latter may not handle metal in the forms defined as hazardous
in this report, there is generally insufficient information to draw a
line between the activities of one type of business and another,, As
Appendix K indicates, some of the contractor companies engage in more
than one treatment or disposal practice.
Four contractor organizations which serve SIC 355 and 357 plants
were visited during the study. All of these are located in EPA
Region V. Two operations collect waste oil. Depending on the
quality of the oil, one either sells it to rerefineries or uses it
for road oiling. That firm also collects crankcase oil from service
stations. The second company of this type uses the waste oil for
road oiling exclusively. This second firm also handles sewage from
septic tanks which is spread over farm lands for fertilizer.
179
-------
One facility visited handles most of the cyanide waste generated
in a Region V metropolitan area. This amounts to about 264,950
liters (70,000 gal.) per year of liquid cyanide and an undetermined
amount in solid form. The company has a state permit to incinerate
the cyanide collected. This material caused the incinerator's
refractory lining to deteriorate rapidly, however, and the equipment
was not in operation at the time of the visit. It was reported by
company personnel that combustion temperature was maintained at 900°C
(1700°F). The incinerator has a cylindrical primary combustion
chamber followed by a secondary chamber and apparently has
demonstrated that it can comply with state air pollution standards
without control equipment. This company also collects about
2,649,500 liters (700,000 gal.) per year of waste oil, most of which
is burned as supplemental fuel in the incinerator. However, a small
portion of the oil is treated with acid and/or heated using steam
coils to effect solids and dirt precipitation. This reclaimed oil is
then sold as a substitute for No. 3 grade fuel oil.
The other disposal facility visited is a large 19 million liter
(5 million gal.) per year regional operation handling organic
chemical wastes for several hundred customers in several states. It
has the capability to transport both bulk liquids in tank trailers of
approximately 19,000 liters (5000 gal.) each and drummed wastes on
trailers. The company disposes of these wastes through an
incineration process utilizing rotary kilns, liquid burners, and
sludge incineration. It employs extensive air pollution control
including two high-energy venturi scrubbers.
A good deal of information was obtained on the services of
another more sophisticated disposal and recovery contractor in Region
V through the survey of a large plant belonging to one of its
customers. This facility provides oxidation-reduction, acidulation, .
neutralization, chemical detoxification, and thermal destruction of
liquid wastes as well as oil and solvent recovery. Its fluidized bed
incinerator is also equipped with a high energy wet scrubber.
Analytical services are available to determine the appropriate
methods and cost of disposal.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL AT TYPICAL
MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS
Characteristics for Typical Special
Machines Manufacturing Plants
A typical plant within SIC 355 was defined in Section III as a
machine shop with attendant plate and structural fabrication
facilities and painting operation located in a predominantly urban
area where land is relatively scarce. As shown in Table I!£~4 , the
180
-------
typical plant generates a total of 16.4 kkg/year (18.1 tons/year) of
process wastes, all of which is considered potentially hazardous.
These wastes are combined in a 15-cubic meter (20-cubic yard) trash
container for collection by a private contractor at a frequency of
once/week to once/month. The wastes are taken to an off-site sanitary
landfill for disposal.
Characteristics for Typical Office, Computing, and
Accounting Machines Manufacturing Plants
A typical plant in SIC 357, as stated in Section III, consists
of a machine shop and an assembly operation. Approximately 1404
kkg/year (15.9 tons/year) of process wastes are produced, all of
which are classified as potentially hazardous. The wastes are
combined in a trash container along with trash and garbage for
collection by a private contractor who picks up the wastes on a
prearranged time schedule. It is unlikely that the contractor picks
up full loads from the plant although he probably charges the plant
for pick-up and disposal at a fixed monthly rate. The wastes are
hauled to an off-site sanitary landfill operation for disposal.
LEVELS OF TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY
FOR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTES
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has defined three
levels of treatment and disposal technology which are or may be
applicable to potentially hazardous waste streams generated by the
industries which manufacture special industrial machinery and office,
computing, and accounting machines which are destined for land
disposal. These technology levels are defined as follows:
Level I - The technology currently employed by typical
facilities — i.e., broad average present treatment and disposal
practice.
Level II - The best technology currently employed.
Identified technology at this level must represent the soundest
process from an environmental and health standpoint currently in use
in at least one location. Installations must be commercial scale;
pilot and bench scale installations are not suitable.
Level III - The technology necessary to provide adequate
health and environmental protection. Level III technology may be
more or less sophisticated or may be identical with Level I or Level
II technology. At this level, identified technology may include
pilot or bench scale processes providing the exact stage of
development is identified.
181
-------
The wastes from four processes in SIC 355 and 357 plants were
designated as potentially hazardous in Section III. The
characteristics of the wastes from machine shops,(including tool and
die shops; plate and structural fabrication; and stamping, blanking,
and forming) as practiced by these industries are identical, and
these wastes were combined under the title "machine shop waste
stream." The other potentially hazardous waste streams are heat
treating, electroplating, and painting, for a total of four
potentially hazardous waste streams.
The technologies identified in this section apply to the wastes
of both SIC 355 and 357 plants. This is because no discernible
differences were found in the wastes generated by each process which
were due to or influenced by the characteristics of the SIC category.
In addition, similar wastes generated in either classification are
subject to the same methods of treatment, if any, and disposal.
The percentage of plants using each technology was estimated on
the basis of survey data from 33 plants. This sample of
establishments represents less than one percent of the production of
special industrial machinery and office machines.
Definitions which apply to the technologies are as follows:
ganitary Landfill - Land disposal facilities characterized
by the spreading of waste in thin layers, compacted to the smallest
practical volume and covered with soil at the end of each working
day. They do not normally have special containment, monitoring, or
provision for treatment of leachate.
Secured Landfill - Land disposal facilities characterized by
impervious containment of the waste with provisions for monitoring
and treatment of leachate if required. Adequate diversion and
control of surface water are required as well as registration of the
site for a permanent record of its location once filled.
Incineration - Combustion of an organic or partially organic
waste stream with adequate means for complying with applicable air
pollution control regulations and for disposal of collected
particulate and ash (usually of a potentially hazardous nature) in a
secured landfill.
Dump - a land site where solid waste is disposed without
covering or containment.
The most prevalent current technology (Level I) for machine shop
wastes is contractor disposal in off-site sanitary landfills. It is
practiced by about 70 percent of the industry. Level II, the best
technology currently in use, is recovery of oil by contractor for
reuse off-site. Sweepings and grindings are placed in sanitary
landfills. While some plants claim that they completely recirculate
coolants and cutting oils, this is not established as a Level II
182
-------
technology since it is not achievable under all conditions of
operation. Level III or environmentally adequate technology for
machine shop wastes is the same as Level II except that secured
landfill is required for sweepings, grindings, and sludge. The
treatment and disposal technologies and pertinent considerations for
machine shop wastes are set forth in Table IV-2.
Tables IV-3 through IV-6 show that contractor disposal in
landfill is also Level I technology for the waste streams from
electroplating, heat treating, and painting operations. Although
Level II technology for each waste varies, Level III technology (the
treatment and disposal method required for adequate health and
environmental protection) is not currently practiced for any process
waste stream deemed potentially hazardous. This is because secured
landfills are not, to the contractor's knowledge, utilized by the
industry.
Electroplating wastes are separated into heavy metal sludge and
acid/ alkaline wastes. This is because acid/alkaline wastes are
currently sewered to municipal wastewater treatment plants.
Obviously, this does not constitute disposal on land; however, the
inplementation of effluent guidelines pertaining to electroplating
wastes will result in wastewaters and sludges which will be destined
for land disposal by 1983. Level III technology for acid/alkaline
wastes have thus been designated as disposal in secured landfills.
Tables IV-2 through IV-6 generally provide an overview of each
process waste stream, its characteristics, and the treatment and
disposal technology generally applied. The quantities of wastes
handled in each technology level are provided along with amounts of
residues from treatment stages. The numbers and percentages of
plants implementing each technology level are estimated. Brief
discussions are provided of the adequacy of technology, inherent
problems or comments, non-land environmental impact, compatibility
with existing facilities, monitoring and surveillance requirements,
installation time, and energy requirements. The conclusions reached
regarding these factors reflect the contractor's assessment of the
current situation based primarily on the plant survey data and a
literature search.
The technologies shown in the tables do not address in-plant
practices or the potential for process or raw material change which
could reduce either the quantities of wastes for disposal or their
hazardous characteristics or both. However, the technologies will be
greatly enhanced if innovative internal waste control technologies
are more widely applied.
While good housekeeping practices were observed in virtually all
surveyed plants, and management was especially sensitive to spills
and leaks of costly materials, continued and expanded monitoring is a
183
-------
— c
re o
.
U C
I— <0
TJ
>. 4)
Ol >-
0 0
"o "a
C E
-C LU
L>
4) >•
(_ •»
4->
4-» C
in 4)
4) i-
CO L.
*— - 3
U
J3
in
Ul
o
CL
4)
i_
3
x
*i
4)
Ol
•a
3
m
•«.
O
TJ
c
o
4-1
TJ
U
•—
£
u.
4)
-C
4J
o
L.
o
s_
—
l/l
C
4)
£
01
TJ
L.
u_
TJ
i
<4_
o
4)
U
3
4_l
x
z
Ol
T)
u
TJ
4->
4)
E
xi
*-*
3
41
01
-a
3
Jl
>*
.._
O
l
TJ
TJ
TJ
L.
o
l/l
4-1
TJ
in
in
TJ
6
>.
>
TJ
4)
X
0
*x
o
i-l
4)
L.
TJ
in
4)
>
4-1
4)
4-J
Ul
i
<4-
o
>-
4)
>
O
O
4)
u.
4)
4-i
.—
m
<4—
M-
o
3
TJ
ui
4)
a:
01
c
c
M—
4)
U
4)
u.
x:
Ol
3
O
L.
JC.
4_(
4-1
l/l
M~
<4_
O
•"•
IZ
u-
T3
C
TJ
^
>.
U
nj
4_l
C
TJ
m
_
flj
*j
a>
E
4-
O
""
—
"4—
•o
c
ra
^~
>>
u
fO
4J
c
TJ
Ul
O
O
O O
o
LT\ Lf\
tn
4J
C
4)
E
01
TJ
l_
u_
m
<
O.
Ul
0
O
Z
<
h-
•z.
LU
3:
t-
<
LU
o:
l—
>.
Ol
o
o
c
_c
— o
4)
_l H-
LU
> *J
LU C
—1 4)
TJ
>
4)
U
a.
>— *
Ul
u
TJ
i/l
T)
4J
4)
E
01
c
c
TJ
4-1
C
o
u
_
0
>.
4-»
L.
—
>-
1
(/I
4>
>
"O
-o
<
*J
L.
-a
-a
c
nj
A
Ul
4_J
C
4)
>
0
Wl
4-1
C
4)
3
u
4-J
Wl
C
o
u
Ul
3
O
-a
\-
TJ
N
(D
x:
c
TJ
4-1
C
o
•o
c
TJ
Ul
ij
C
Ol
TJ
U
u-
T)
4>
E
M—
O
QJ
D
4-1
X
4)
>
o
in
Ul
-a
>.
._
-o
(0
4)
i_
•o
.3
O
O
JZ
o
..—
.n
3
Wl
iv
Ul
3
l/l
4)
U
C
TJ
l/l
XI
3
Ul
m
3
O -0
-o —
L- D
TJ 0-
N —
fO —
x:
Ul
Ol 3
C 0
E 0
L- Ul
o
TJ
4-)
4)
E
>-
>
TJ
4)
x: o
TJ X
C O
TJ +J
in 4)
— L.
•— TJ
o
in
0) 4-J
E ^~
O TJ
o
t-
s
e »i
QJ 0]
SI 3
tO fO
3
— T3
i a:
' o
Ol
o
"o
c
.c
I
-a
u
TJ
N
CT3
X
>•
TJ
+j
C
4)
4~*
O
a.
u-
O
4-<
C
3
<
ly Handled, 100,000
c
4)
L.
L.
3
<_>
4>
4J
TJ
3
m
3
O
_c
Ol
4)
2
.
"*•>
Ol
-a:
_^
4)
in
3
TJ
3
13
in
4)
o:
<4-
o
c
3
i
<
4>
XI
OJ
U
Q.
CL
TJ
4-1
i
4-1
-C
Ol
4)
3
41
3
>-
-•x.
0)
.^
ja:
Ul
4-J
c
TJ
0.
14-
O
L.
JS
6
3
Z
-o
01
1
4-1
l/l
LU
O
o
o
>.
Ol
o
o
c
u
4)
01
c
in
.0
u-
O
4)
01
«3
4W
C
4)
O
i_
4)
0.
TJ
4)
i
4_)
U>
LU
O
1--.
>.
Ol
0
o
c
JZ
u
OJ
(—
Ol
c
in
ID
i/)
4-J
C
TJ
Q_
184
-------
_a
ID
— c
0) O
Q) ._
I 4-»
U
0) 0)
4-J 4-J
O3 O
— D L.
^ O" Q-
"O •—
— ) < 0)
iii ±j
> J- C
uj o w
-i u- E
c
>- O
en t-
O —
O c
C UJ
_c
o T:
- OJ
O 0
— c P
_J (J
UJ 01 >
> t- —
t) L.
*-^
"^
Ol
o
o
c
JZ
— o
tl
_j H-
UJ
UJ C
—1 t>
re
«
Q.
CC
O
«
^
i/l
OJ
a_
*~
o
(U
•— 4-J
t/) E
{/t 4-1
0) 0)
01
cr a)
< 3
0)
(D
i
in
03
(U
03
I/)
1
C
y_ o
O U
1 =•"
-C U
o u
fD O
0)
— >.
OJ
i- E
0 *
U- 4-t
O OJ
c m
oc —
0)
•• -M
4-J E
03
cr o
0)
•Q in
01 —
— o
en
o
"o
C
()
fl)
H-
V*_
o
..
03
3
ft)
-Q
U in
0) —
u- -o
13 >-
tn 0?
L.
O *n
u c
tt) oj
4-> E
3 U-
Q
01 tl
C Z
C k.
'i 4-.
5 §
L.
4-J
i
_O
ID
c
(71
C
ID
C
ID
C
O
u
- in
tl 01
"o o
in jo
±
-O
.—
>
in
— .
._
14-
C
ID
tl
01 «—
k_ 4-1
3
01 —
3 "
01 4J
0
o
j:
I
IB
en
O •
Q. tl
in *—
T3 JB
1 5
in fD
C
01 >~
o.—
X —
01 ^
C IB
— V
k.
in T3
O c
Z IB
in
4-(
C
Q
U
-a
c
ID
E
01
J3
o
a.
ti
E IB
O S 0>
k. — C
u- c —
— C
E r —
01 u- •
— 01 4J
XI • k. C
O C tl 01
a..- 4->
4-* Ol IB
01 IB C 01
in k. — 1-
.— tl E <-"
o a 3
c o in k.
in tl
o) ai ID 4->
— C ID
— C U tl
in .— ID 4J
in u- a. in
O tl E ID
o. k. — 3
t)
k. 14- -O
£ U . 14- .-
k- ID — C 01
>4- ^ 3 3 k.
in 1-
in 01 "u
E • k. T3 0)
tl m- c —
— • C O O O k.
a. u Q.O. a
£
O
C
c
ID
01
J2
u
ID
01
0) in
± ^
in j^
S S
a. a
m
c
ti
E
c
O
...
C
UJ
13
C
(D 4-J
— O
1 OJ
c a
O E
—
V
u
in
ID
Ol
E
ID
k- E
fc O
in
C •
O 01
— 4_t
IB in
U 1
tl x—
Q.U-
O O
Ol —
C ID
— O
C —
— E
u- o
01 C
k- O
01 U
a: ti
— 01
c —
O 3
ID
-O JC
tl
11
Z tl
JO
• ID
01 4->
— a
JO 11
— u
ID k_
a
E c
o o
0 —
>- u
— ti
in —
ID O
01
c
40
I/I
X
UJ
JC
'3
X
4-1
•—
— in
JO —
'— 4-*
4O .—
ID —
a. —
O ID
CJ U.
!_'
tl
c
c
ID
E
in
4_t
C
01
JO
.—
4J
ID
a
^1.
-o
c
ID
01
in
1
u-
14-
0
•o
c
IB
in
01
.—
Q-
11
k-
-D
01
ID
u
01
C
01
Ol
k_
4-1
ID
3
14- IN
tl -v.
k. —
tl 1
a —
01
ti
in
IB
u
E
ID
00
-D
tl
1-
3
O"
tl
tl
C
0
Z
1
I—
c
o
_.
_-
fD
(A
c
—
__
OJ
ft)
V>
03
E
03
_
CJ
C
— Ql
U- O C
a» 4-» .-
L. L.
0) 4) 0)
L. en >
"0 O
O ^ <-)
4J ^
in -o
0) C
4-1 en oj
(/> C
0) *— "
en m ~
c JT ui
«». •. ....
3 en o)
0) c in
-C — 0
a a.
i- E ui
O 3 —
0)
*^
in
03
in
in
O —
a >
03 O
-C 0
i- -o
o c
LL /D
in
C
a>
E
0)
u
D
cr
V
a:
>*
en
a>
c
UJ
185
-------
00
LU
I-
00
Q.
g
X:
4J . — •
r- C
re o
Oi •<-
ar +J
o
Ol Ol
4J •<->
re o
3 V.
>-i era.
.-. Ol
«t re
LU L. C
> O 01
LU
o c
C LU
X:
o -o
Ol C
1— re
re
0
4J
M-
4-1 O
C
Ol 4->
U LO
S- -i-
Ol to
CL c
O
O 0
LO
i x:
o o
e\j -f-
cn s in
•i- *+- i —
c o re
• i- to
re oi
4-> E •—
c o re
o to 4->
o oi
oi to
Cnxi >*
•0-r- ?
3 r- re
r— O 01
00 « .C
T3
>j Oi
Cn >^
0 0
i-> o "a
1-1 c E
X: LU
1 O
LU Ol >,
> 1— •—
LU 4->
_J 4-> c
to ai
01 S-
oo s.
o
*— *
"
Ol
>
Ol
_l
to
(D
01
E
re
00
01
cn
xi
3
to
T3
'o
LO
1
E
Ol
00
1—1
QJ
>
Ol
1
to
re
i
re
oo
Oi
>
Ol
— 1
to
re
re
00
*"
QJ
01
_l
to
re
01
E
re
00
•o
Ol
3
O
OJ
(/>
>,
3
XI
01
P_
o
*+-
cn
c
•r"
S_
Ol
4-J •
re cn
2 C
Ol -r-
Ol Z-
cnM-
XI "D
3 C
00 f—
•D
i i — re
"o +j '"
LO LO X,
s_
£53
"§ '3 'E
i — re
to cn to
c
S- -i- C
O LO -r-
H- to
Ol T>
i— I O OJ
O to
f- !- 0
o> o. a.
> Ol to
O) i. •(-
i— -D
0
tO 4J t/1
re E
(/I O •
E C 4-> r^
re 01 o -r-
00 > XI 14-
o
*— '
Ol
Ol
1
LO
re
i
re
oo
Ui— C
Ol
s
re
o
ai
oi
ai
oi
01
Ol
QJ
S- J=
4-> O
I- .C LO
QJ 5 -t->
a. •—
o i- re
i- ai to
re i —
C QJ 4->
3 re
to >
O QJ
Ol i—
4J re c
re to -i-
3 o re
cr Q- 4-»
oi to c:
-o ••- o
«t XI O
~
>
Ol
to
re
re
00
oi -a
XI C
re
CH-
OI
LO &_
Ol 3
3 01
tt- to
C S
CLL.
QJ
s- cn •
O C Ol
LO i-X)
OJ 4J»—
4-> re-r-
i — 5 re
•r- Ol >
OJ
>
01
_l
to
re
re
oo
re
Ol
&_
•4->
s~
QJ •
CLS-
O QJ
&~ -M
a. re
2
cnoi
•r— [/)
E re
3 3
LO
l^H-
(Tj O
I 0
c to
QJ
Ol
— 1
LO
re
re
00
QJ Ci—
CS-r-
>> t-
i— 4-1 C
re c re
3 OJ^^
to E
3 QJ^3
!- QJ
l/l"- S-
LO 3 3 •
QJ O" O QJ
O Ol QJ 4-1
O S-00-r-
S- Ul
Q.T3 1
C .t-
cn re QJ u-
Ci— r- O
•r- .0
Oi re*J QJ
4-> E ra4J
re-»- Q- re
X c E o
O E Or-
QJ
OJ
_J
LO
re
re
00
>
^ LL.
O
QJ
— I «J
CD «I
Kl 00
H- O
Q.
00
a
z
t
LU
LU
or
h-
>,
cn
O
"o
c
x:
o
>-.
> C
Ol Ol
_J . —
re
>
QJ
S~
a.
4J
c
01
U
S-
01
a.
Cvj
i
cn
c
c
re
4J
c
o
U
cn
"O
2
l/l
a:
o
i-
o
<
U-
in
0)
•i™
&_
e
a.
re
u
j=
o
>B
S
I/)
a.
&
XI
3
LO
01
+->
re
2
OJ
+j
to
re
3
re
3
to
Ol
ct
tt-
o
c
o
a.
o
o
X
0
4J
01
s~
re
*j
re
LO
re
4J
OJ
^
re
Oi
X
u-
o
Ol
e
cn
S
cn
c
4-1
O
01
(*-
t*_
-------
-
o o-o >>i- c
(O .(— 53 Ol QJ Q>
0) +J rt3 i- -t-> E
_J (T3 0) n3 O.
l/l 1- " C S'i-
1/1 OJ QJ QJ QJ 3
-Q Q) Q.-M •»-> CT
0) U O'i- >><^ Ol
t_ O (/>' — «3
•r- • !- +-> J3 S Ol
3T3 O. Cr--f- C
cr oj - — t/m--'-
0) t- 01
Ol O" 1-
c OJ 0)i — • E OJ
S- ID i— -4->-O
O 0) 5 O>Oi — rt3
4J^ OJ C-4-»''-i S- 111 -4JT3
O s-i—
4- rt3 3-»- O l/l
S- 01 Si— 5M-
4) C */l QJ (/I >i
+J -r- i. -O OTO -Q
(D L. 113 O1C OJ
SO OJ (U C->- S-TD
oi +j >, o>f- s- -r- 0
+J.F- "Or— 0) 3+^
Ifl C OJ 3 3 > O-10
ro O I r— (O O O) S-
3 E i — OO J3 U S- 0)
4J +•> S
o
(O OJ Ol
S- +-1 C
Q- , -o 3
i— i- OlO
m •— c o
E 3-r-
i- cr i—T3
O Ol 3 C
C S- (T3 T3
.C
QJ CIJ OJ
C C S-*-1
O O O-t-
03
•»- O"
+J 0)
187
-------
i— c
ID o
Ol ••-
— • .
=3-=
C
>! O
01 I.
o •.-
o-o
01 C
I- 10
j:1
10 >
Ol
0)
(U
>
11
Ol II
•O £
01 S.
3 Ol
O 10 O
•f- vi Ol
f— O VI
0.0.
Q. VI C
IO -I— •)—
•o
C1 •- 3
•5 Ol f-
C C VI
01 •*- Ol
o >•
1=11
f: _i o LU
« LU Ol
^ LU I—
£ oi 01
r' oo t.
5 «_ i.
J 3
si <->•
o
at
%
Q
z
i S "" "
•< *""
OJ 4J
<-. > s:
2 41 0)
: ^"-S
IB .»-
01 C
C -C >
o-^
JD
I— 0) •!-
^1 S» VI
i- 3 VI
VI 4J O
VI IO CL
O C
Of
>
OJ
0)
>
OJ
-O >>
C •—
"" c
flj aj
4J L.
vi 3
i u
c
O 4J
o
•a z •
oi ~o
r«4 c
10 oi
1. !_ C
Z vi c
a
>
Ol
11
>
HI
0)
>
"
IO .— !.
10 C
s- vi :
o r
> .t- Q) C
!— S re
•o
3
3
O
01
3
CT
S- 10
U I/I C
QJ QJ
Ol^ i/l
C -i- Ol
3 >,
^— CJ fl>
0 J3
C
•^ • >1
U (O
vi f- g
4-> X
F- O i •
1O 4-» O U
I/I -f- •»-
Ol J= X
•- &. X O
10 10 4->
»-> vi
o
VI
L. «
.. s«
Ol C r— L.
£ -o -
ID TJ 3 Ol
•o
01
£
3
O
O
O
• •O 14- c
VI C O 01
^— ID £
ID C 4J
•b> * O 10
•»- ID 4->
X = 1-
> -i— Ol Ol
iO *— O. Ol
Ol ID O iO
— -^ 2
»— oi aj
a
v» •
ID
ro »
ID QJ Ol U
3 T3 VI -r-
O-— Q. Ol
Ol S- 3 O
•O O •—
iO 3 C O
~ C O 2
vi o;
a. o
>, i^
O) T3 Ol
O '- ^.
*O
C
o
a.
I (13 i—
c >,
w^
o c
a. 01
s. w
•4- i- £
o 3 01
4-1 QJ
c oi s
3 -u
o
^~
O
!- >>
QJ CT
-O O
IS
••- c
Ul r—
188
-------
(t3
3 • 01
o> « —
VI > .Q
Irt ••— fB
O> VI >> C
O C r— O
O O> CL'r-
S- Q. O.4-»
Q- X 3 VI
OJ VI OJ
E 3
o >, o cr
S- .-?4->
H_ U 4->
> >! C
"io 4J -r- E
> (13 . — O.
E "0! .S 3
aj s- TO cr
S- Ol
01 V)
i— i. O
(O r— OI •»—
OJ •»- 3 IB
U *r-
> Ol <4- rc
(O 4J C VI
i s s: "o
4-»
O
C -V)
V) f— O>
o 4-> .a
"O OJ O
o; a.
c >»
o > oi
IB OJ T-
.c s-
C 0
O Ol 3
IB
N J= oO
•r- 4-»
IB S -0
S- •,-
4-> •— C
3 IB lt<
0) O) >,
-o
O
.£
4J
r_
is
v»
0
a.
V)
•i- oj
OJ ro
> i—
VI ID
c >
OJ TO
a.
x >,
C 4J
01
4-» S-
VI S-
O 3
S 0
V)
4-»
i
o
o
•a
c
IB
V)
E
01
r^
0
i-
a.
^
10
V.
Ol
c
£
(—
aj
— j
vi
n3
S
(TJ
01
ra
c
•M
i.
C
o
•4->
13
0
CL
S_
OJ
•4->
fO
2
CD
S-
0)
>
QJ
(^
+->
U
f^
1— 1
n3
•M
C
1
0
S-
•r—
>
C
UJ
-a
c
«
c
I
40
c c
o is
•r- 4J
4-> V>
10 X5
C 3
•r- VI
Q Ol
VI i.
Ol •!-
Q 3
.?
01
p— +J
^3 O
*J =
n3 v>
i-s
o -o
u
•w
>> c
S =
(O CX •
.a -r- (B
O 3 Ol
i- O-S-
a_ oj to
C r—
O i—
-4-> E
*B VI
Nl
••- >>
(T3 0)
S- > .
4-* *r^ t/1
3 -W-4-*
Ol US C
2! ^— O)
OJ E
t- O>
S-
QJ Wi-
-c £ cr
4-> S &.
Q.-W n
O >,S-
^J
c
a.
3
cr
o>
(13
U
a.
o
z
o>
S -ci
•t- OJ
4-> U
fO -r-
r3
cr
01
<_> u
Ol
c
•£
V)
X
LU
4->
2
>,
^-)
• ^
i — V)
JD •>-
IT3 r—
O- —
§U
(U
0 LU
•a c
Ol OJ
s- o
O (O
+•>••-)
o
E-o
Ol S-
J2 0
•M
4->-r-
Crt C
3 O
E E
i- Ol
aj_a
4->
«-o
OJ 3
•*-> o
s_
a
4_>
c
^
a.
4->
C
OJ
3
14-
14-
UJ
T3
a>
u
4->
>
(T3
0
C
Ol
o
z
Ol
u
c
rt3
r—
1
Ol
j?
T3
C
1T3
C Ol
4J C
•>— -C
C U
OOJ
t.
o
<4-
(/)
!_
10
CO
>,
PJ •
*J
C C
fO ^
£ £
•»-> a.
s- 5
r-
4->
22
.a-r-
Sw yi
>
0) Ul
>^
O^
" — C
C N
fQ-r-
.Ci—
•M (O
S-
(/!-(->
01 3
CU OJ
—J C
•§
!_
5
cr
01
c
i— O
iB-i-
•1— 4->
•M ID
C C
IB-^-
4-1 f-
v> (B
JD V)
3 OJ
i/Ta
E
1 OJ •
IB.C 4->
S-O C
4_> QJ
3 E
Ol • O-
C Vl'i-
ai 3
.c-,- cr
cn4-> o»
3-.-
o^- en
S--r- C
i: <_>T-
4-» IT3T3
i»- aj
en oj
c crm-
•«- c
t'r-i—
N (B
3'i- U
O- — -f-
VI
S-
g
V)
>l
4-> •
•r--O
> Ol
i_ C
E
OJ
oi'o.
c
>,
i — (T3
-------
01
>
Ol
o
C Ol
c
VI 'I—
'££
Ol
a; c 13
!_ re C
01 x re
a: u,—
re
ai
o
c
o
c
01
.^ 5 U O
•o
111
g c vi
aj o ai
re *
3 JS
o- o
01 re
•o
c
re
U
01
^
U LLj
a;
01 a)
ca s.
01
E
01
>
ai
ai
>
01
1>
>
01
re
JJ
O
a.
1/1
i—<
o
a
5
re
X
X
O
0
'o
c
.c
CJ
Ol
1—
4-1
c
Ol
're
>
Ol
s_
0.
u
,
VI
4->
re
C/l
r-_
re
40
Ol
E
Ol
c
c
re
40
SI
o
o
o
>>
4?
i.
a
01
>
'**•
."£_
•o
•a
re
_
0
0)
CT
•a
3
(/I
-a
c
(Q
*
C/1
•W
fO
irt
QJ
T3
C
t/)
-P
C
OJ
=J
4_)
4->
ul
C
O
o
VI
3
O
I
re
M
re
.c
c
«
4->
C
0
u
x
re
E
VI
T>
>r~
'o
VI
•o
Ol
•o
c
Ol
CL
(/>
3
VI
SI
4J
3
T3
3
a-
•^
VI
3
0
3
0
VI
>
-o
c
re
*
VI
4->
re
V
re •
4J 0
E 'x
o
X4-1
>
re 01
01 !-
j= re
" VI
VI i —
Ol •!-
T3 0
C Ol
re E
X O
o vl
o
o
o
S-
t- 3 -
O O "4-
S- 4->
O Ol
t- i.
O O
01
O
re vi
'4- 4->
S-. r—
3 « 4J
to VI C
> re
s- -— -o
o re c
4-> Ol
s- 01 4J
01 s 4->
4-> re
re x vi
i > ^ 4->
•5 re 4-> c
c 01 -r- 01
3 x: 3 3
o 4J
S- Ur--^
Ol-r- -i- 4."
X O VI
Ol O C
E 4J -O O
Ol C
4-1 re
re x
3 o
-
re -
: re
VI
C •!- -- _
•i- 3 Ol O
E -a -a
• re s. ••- s-
40 01 c re
c 4-J re N
o re X re
o 3 u .c
O •
Ct QJ
X -.—
Ol "O
c re
•^ 01
i-
o>
a.
o
01
^:
cj
X
.C
a.
o
"o
3
-o
tn
01
a
vi S-
3 X
O ^,
•o cn
s. ^
re ^
N
re •
-C "O
01
:=!
re re
X
S-
Ol
S. .
3
_
O 1-
4_j re
O N
re re
C 01
3 4J
O V)
V)
Ol
S-
4J 0)
C 3
3
O 4->
M-
o
c x
01 en
u a
TJ o
01 o>
4-1 4->
E 01
•r- C
O
o
14-
o
190
-------
s.
o
W-
M-
O
C
3
S-
0
C
c
e
3
t/1
(/I
IB
4J
u
IB
1
Ol
(B IB
'c «
•r- at
"
1
I/I
IO
s
IT3
t/1
111
1 4->
C •!-
3 in
is
o
+J
(U C
C CJ
•*-* *r^
trt "O
•r- (d
X
0,0{
o -C
**- u
a> aj
C r— QJ
s- -o ^
O C (O
4-> (TJ l/l
*CM- *>
»e- /-* *«
r~
(^-
•a
c
ns
f—
-o
a>
^
(J
O)
w
L.
0
4_
to
(/) C
O) 4-J
CXJ 0)
| Q.
—
(U
>
OJ
J
VI
(0
s
(tJ
oo
OJ
>
O)
M-
0
c
3
i-
T3
C
(B
0)
4->
(13
J=
U
IB
ai
ai »
S <1>
V> JO
(/) O
o s-
a. a.
o ai
•f- 4->
u en
01 1
I— <»-
o o
o
•o
>> c
r— IB
C
O «
i.
•a ai
41 r—
-*J •-—
IB Q.l«-
tai -o
U C
Ol IB
O S_ r—
•a
ai
u
4->
o
IT3
L
Q.
>,
O
c
CD
I
T3
111
i-
3
cr
£
01
1
,
•— •
<(- 1—
c <*-
IB
^- £
+J
O •!-
4-> 2
01 Ol
•^ c
00 -t-
o^ o
C 0
'a c
01
s- *->
0 f
U- VI
c
o
o
Q.-I-
e u
O (O
U U-
O
CTl l/l -i-
tr QJ 4->
•i- 3 re
s- o- i—
a •— r—
•u c IB
a-
ai
cc
i-
01
c
191
-------
_c
J-> —
i— C
ro o
01 -r-
Z -t->
U
Ol Ol
-1-1 4->
ro o
3 S.
i-< 0-0-
i— . Ol
*- -a i—
< a
_j 4J
LU i. C
> O Ol
UJ 4— E
-•>,§
Ol I.
o ••-
f— >
O C
C UJ
J=
o -o
01 C
t— ra
~"
OJ
>
0)
_l
V)
>~,
>,^5
O"l QJ
0 >,
i— O
•— " O i —
_l U LU
UJ Ol
CtL -J H-
h- UJ
UJ C
—1 0)
fO
>
o
i_
Q_
.4- .
4-1 O VI •
C 4-1 ul
Ol C C 3
> O Ol O
i — -r- > -O
0 *» .- S-
l/l fO O fC
i- ui N
* +-* ro
c c -.C
-.- OJ
VI U 4->
a> c c
i- o QJ a>
O E £.
C — Q-
QJ (Q irt
E E gj QJ
Oi en £ >
EL >>00 4J
O -r- Wi T3
c/i >
j; M-
O- U
OJ
>
OJ
_J
t/l
(D
fO
on
4-J
(/I
3
O
•o
3
CT
V)
§
3
(j
t/1
>
(U
+J
(/)
rt3
"3.
r—
3
"O
OJ
Qi
M-
O
C
O
4->
Q.
S-
U
(/I
QJ
I
01
_J
VI
(0
i
ca
00
u
"2 '5
c o
10 4-1
VI Ol
4-> .a
c
01 1
CX-C
o
VI ••-
•S "i
rO
4-J VI
c ai
o >
4-1
VI "U
3 T3
a a
•a
C VI
4J >
(O O
>1
> Ol
«3 Ol ' —
>
C M- Ol
^ 4-1 j3
O1-5 >,
•r- -0 r?
O- (O E
M-
o
Ol
Ol
&.
en
Ol
Ol
c
o
Ol
4-
<4_
eC
i- -o
O U
4-> (O
O M
ro (O
u- ai
ro -r- 14-
O g •— O
4J ro U
^ C 01
J= U M- C
VI Ol •'-
J= -O O^
4J C 4-> M-
s o c
C J2 r— -O
3 (O •»— Ol
i— S- 4-1 i.
VI ra VI 3
a. tj
C 00 4-> VI
8. .*!•
p— VI
4-i — 4-> "O
0 -r- C 01
4- Ol 2
c -a > o
0 C .— .—
•i- 4-
4-1 ra 4-1 -r- "O
C i — ra U C
•r- E C fO
ra >^ ra -r- i —
0. Cr-
ro O V) >,
"4- 4-1 Ol C i.
O ••- i. O ra
C 4J 4J
C ro T3 4J -i-
O VI C 3 C
•r- ro J3 ra
4J o VI
ro 4-* C r—
S- 0 f— >,
Ol J= 't- -r- JO
C V) 4J 4J
•i- ro ra VI "O
CJ &- Ol
C J= ro VI S
•r- 4-> Q.4J o J=
•i— Ol C i — VI
Ol S OO Ol r— ro
4J > 0
•r- O) i— <4- 4-
VI CT1 • O O
1 -O r— VI C
4- 3 i— O Ol
<4- r- M- <4- -l- C
O VI 4- O 4-> •!-
-
C
•o
c
ra
o
4-1
E
l/l
Ol
4J
VI
4_
4_
O
g?
O
o
c
-C
ro
Ol
S_
1—
0
o
§
•-
o
8
rji
VI S-
3 >i
-O Ol
L. ^£
rO -^
N
ro *
J= "D
Oi
>>•—
r- T3
^- C
ro ra
•r- JZ
4-1
C >>
01 i—
4-1 4-1
O C
a. oi
S- 4-1
4- 1- -C
O 3 Ol
0 -r-
'c oi s
3 4-1
J(/l 4J
ro Ol
3 2
Ol
J3
(0
U
'a.
Q.
ro
4-1
O
z
0
o
s-
>1
Ol
^t
^
^t
ro
2
ro
4-1
C
OJ
T3
VI
ai
S-
4-1
4- J=
O Oi
§*
Q 4J
E Ol
< 2
O O
O O
O i—
O if>
0 r~
<£>
Ol
Ol C
C •(-
•r- VI
t/1 3
3
VI
VI 4-1
4-1 C
ro r—
r— a.
a.
4-
4- O
o
4-1
S- c
Ol Oi
•i s
3 OJ
c a.
>> >>
*a en -o ai
,
j: i >
v) T3 ra
ra C 0)
>! 3 JC
> Ol O
« JZ L. JE
O) 4-1 O14->
^ E oi 's
4- 0 C
0 !- ••- i-
4- 4-1 Ol
Ol (04-1
C VI C ro
S £ I *
U ro ro O)
, 4-> 4-1
C Ol ra ra Ol
—• E E 2 E
^~
ro
4-1 1
ro Ol
>,4-> U
> C ra
ro O 4-
Ol O S-
J= 3
" VI
4-1. tn
0 3 S-r-
>*J
CJ ro ro >>
« E 2 >
OI ro
_i vi -a ai
4-1 CJ=
Ol ra OJ=
4J VI !_ 4-1
ro Ol*'-
3 4J 2
o- c 01
ai qj c s-
-o E ••- ,
o^
'o
(J
Ol
1—
n
o
>>
o
ro
3
cr
Tjl
192
-------
-a
4->
C
0
o
1
U3
I
>
H^
LU
__l
CO
cC
u-
O
^t
U
(T3
4->
C
OJ
s.
s-
D
U
w
3
Q.
- t/>
•— t »—
r— C
OJ "U
> C
(1) £ re s_
O re -I- 3 O
C i-
•i- 01 i— 3 U
Q. U (O
<4- O 41 41 i-
O i- > -U
X) i- C
i_ Ol *J 4-> O
Ol T- C <*- re
C fO O 01 Ol
3 (/I C
4_) O- *->•!-
C VI N
Ol X> • O •!-
•r- C 01 U >—
O <0 r— •!-
•i- .0 >,4->
I*- V) (O i — 3
t*- <- i — i —
3 O ••- * C
VI 4-> (O 3 41
C VI .C
i— 1- 10 3 S
•a
o
.c:
4->
S
fO
o •
a. aj
Lft r-
,—
> (0
•f- >
(/I >
X -i-
o) -a
.,- 0)
i_
+J
t/l ~O
IS
Ul
4-1
C
c
0
•o
c
rt3
(/)
E
O)
^3
O
S-
O-
(U
>
OJ
_J
t/1
fO
i
*o
1/1
o>
(O V>
CD O
.a c
>>T3 •
<—
£ M O
•(— 4-»
r- r— n3
O fO S-
S- O Ol
•4-> o c:
e . — r-
o o
U 4-1 C
-C -i-
C Ol
O -i- E
4J 00 S-
3 t-
^ E E
O Ol 41
a.. — i —
.a .a
s- o o
•^ !_ S-
«t a. a.
i*-
M-
o
c
3
£_
-o
c
n3
Ol
4->
fO
.C
u
(O
41
41
u
(O
t
T3
-tJ
C
C
o
s-
>
c
UJ
•o
c
fO
1
c
o
2:
'ai
a>
_i
»/>
ro
S
10
oo
S-
o
4->
(O O
i_ 4->
41
C 4->
•^ C
U 41
C U
-.- (O
->->
" "O
>> «
•— ~o
<0 Ol
41 4->
-a O 4)
O 4->
Ol VI
SJS-;
4-J -D ••-
«3 i— t-
O. 3 -O
E O C
o jc 1 Ol 4->
i — i — (O
C 3 !_
O ro 01
.c a.
•o o
41 -
41 Ol i —
O -1-
• 10 14-
41 4-> -a
r— Q. C
js 41 re
•r- 0 r-
+J 4)
re s_ 4>
t = .^
O O VI
U '*- 1
4-J M-
>, O 1*-
r— 41 O
VI »^ XJ
10 O C
UJ U re
01
c
4-1
VI
X
UJ
.c
4-1
• r-
>^
4->
>P-
i — V)
.— 41
•(— 4->
4-> -r-
re i —
O--i-
S 0
o re
o u.
cinerator
c
'*"
x>
C 01
re c
" u
>4- O
0-^
c c
3 Q
&_ E
41 re
4-> Ol
re
o u
re re
Ol •fcJ
-J VI
01
u
4->
U
re
Q.
>,
re
0
c
Ol
c
o
z
^J
Ol
u
4->
u
re
>-,
"re
i.
0
c
£
0
z
41
U
C
re
i —
^
41
>
i.
3
OO
^
C
re
Ol VI
C 01
••- 3
1- O"
o ••-
c u
£.2
41
41
—I
VI
re
E
(C
00
CO
1
OJ Q-
•^^. 3
r— 4->
1 5-
r— 13
4-)
OJ I/I
rO O
4~> -t->
^ §>
O tfl
U OJ
O £
re £
01
C VI
•i- S-
C 41
-o
41
U
3
o-
Ol
u
Ol
c
0
•z.
g
1—
c
o
4^
re
r—
re
4->
VI
C
Ol
>
41
-J
VI
re
S
GO
1
s-
4-> !_ >
•<- O O
VI 4-» U
re oil —
V> Ci—
VI CX>
•^•i- C
o o
4->1- O
Suji^
VI 3 (/!'•-
io>»- ret-
oire c 4->
•? cT's
.— 01 S-
3 E 4IJC
£i r— vi re
O.C
s_ o.re 01
O 3 1- C
U- V>4->->-
VI t —
0-—
VI £-
X!J=
4->
O'r—
4) Ol
3 4)
O1O
C U
^w ^
3 C
re re
.c
41
S-+J
0-^
U- VI
t/1
4-1
C
4>
E
Ol
&-
3
O"
>^
Ol
41
C
UJ
193
-------
waste reduction technique available universally. Larger plants also
have the option to install automatic detection devices, particularly
where solutions of highly toxic metals are employed.
The substitution of equally efficient nontoxic materials for the
toxic ones of historic use appears to require more development before
it becomes a viable waste control technique. However, some beginning
is evident in the use of noncyanide plating solutions and heat
treating salt baths as well as in the stated desire of plant
management to reduce the amounts of cyanides employed. This is
similarly evident to the trend to nontoxic types of paint.
A number of alternatives for controlling drag-out have been
advanced. These include reducing the viscosity of the plating bath
through the use of chemicals of lower density and increasing process
temperature [57], slower removal of the workpiece form the bath and
longer drain times, and neutralization of the thin films of toxic
chemicals clinging to the work piece before it is rinsed in water
[58].
Other waste load improvements are seen in closer control of
process solution concentrations and in various means of reducing
volumes of water used in contact with toxic materials [57]. Another
development which is beginning to find use is selective plating. In
this technique, areas where plating is unnecessary are masked, and
only the significant surface areas are treated, thus reducing
quantities of metal solutions needed. The economics of employing
more environmentally acceptable treatment and land disposal
techniques may serve as the impetus for the development and wider
application of these and other waste reducing measures.
194
-------
SECTION V
COST ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
Potentially hazardous waste treatment and disposal costs for
typical plants are supplied in this section. A discussion of
treatment and disposal costs is then provided, organized according to
the three levels of technology as described in Section IV. Level I
technology for the four potentially hazardous wastes of the special
industrial machinery and office, computing, and accounting machines
industries is discussed first. This is followed by an analysis of
Level II, and finally Level III. A summary table showing treatment
and disposal costs for each major waste at each technology is
provided at the end of the section.
Approximations of the effects of these treatment and disposal
costs at the various technology levels are supplied. Annual costs to
the industries as a whole are given and compared with other economic
indicators such as value of shipments, value added by manufacture,
and cost of materials. The data are presented in terms of 1975
dollars.
Cost data on current waste treatment and disposal practices in
the subject industries were sparse at most of the plants visited and
much of the information collected is in the form of estimates by
plant personnel. Nonetheless, it was necessary to use these data as
a basis for the cost analysis of Level I and II technology.
Supplemental information was provided from a study of hazardous waste
treatment and disposal cost variability [63] and from a recent study
on the potential for capacity creation in the hazardous waste
management service industry [64]. Data were also compiled from the
literature and from contacts with four waste disposal operations
specifically handling wastes from these industries.
Level III technology is not being implemented by the subj ect
industries. Cost estimates for this technology as it applies to the
various waste streams were developed from the literature sources
referenced in this section.
A key feature of the following cost analyses is that the costs
given for each level of technology are based on off-site waste
treatment and disposal. The reasons for this are as follows:
1. At least 90 percent of all special industrial and office
machines manufacturers dispose of their process wastes off—site.
2. The majority of existing plants are located in urban
areas where space availability for treatment and disposal facilities
195
-------
on-site would be a major problem.
3. For the vast majority of establishments, most types of
potentially hazardous wastes are generated in such relatively small
quantities that on-site treatment and/or disposal would be
economically unattractive compared with off-site alternatives — even
those comprising Levels II and III technology.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL COSTS AT TYPICAL
MANUFACTURING PLANTS
A typical manufacturing establishment in SIC 355 was defined in
Section III as a machine shop with attendant plate or structural
fabrication areas and a small painting operation. Production
employees in these specific areas, but not including receiving and
shipping and other staff or maintenance areas, totalled seventeen.
As shown in Table V-l, process wastes consisting of coolants and
oils, sweepings and grindings, solvents, and paint sludge and
overspray were generated at a rate of approximately 16.4 kkg/year
(18.1 tons/year) on a wet weight basis. All these wastes are
considered potentially hazardous based on the criteria used by the
contractor.
Section IV stated that all the process wastes from the typical
plant are picked up by a private hauler periodically and taken to a
sanitary landfill operation for disposal. This constitutes Level I
technology. The cost of this service is roughly $287/year. Average
treatment and disposal costs for Level I technology are $18/kkg
($16/ton) on a wet basis and $27/kkg ($25/ton) on a dry basis, as
shown in Table V-l. To achieve environmentally adequate treatment and
disposal (Level III), costs would increase by about 21 percent.
If Level II technology were practiced by the plant, treatment
and disposal costs would run approximately $344/year, mainly as a
result of sending waste solvent to a contractor's reclaiming
operation instead of to a landfill site. The average cost is $21/kkg
($19/ton) on a wet basis and $32/kkg ($29/ton) on a dry basis»
The implementation of Level III technology would increase the
treatment and disposal costs slightly for potentially hazardous
wastes. These would total about $347/year. The cost increase is
mainly due to the added cost of placing certain wastes, sludges, and
ashes in secured land disposal sites rather than in sanitary
landfills. Wet weight and dry weight treatment and disposal costs
are $21/kkg ($19/ton) and $32/kkg ($29/ton), respectively.
A summary of the costs for each technology level is shown in
Table V-l.
196
-------
TABLE V-l
Typical Plant Costs for Treatment and Disposal of
Potentially Hazardous Wastes, 1975 (SIC 355)
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 17 employees and in located in an urban area in
EPA Region V. The manufacturing processes are: Machine Shop, Plate fie
Structural Fabrication, and Paint Shop. The composition of waste derived
from these processes are: dirty oil; waste solvents; sweepings and grindings,
Annual waste generation rates in kkg/product. employee are 1.0 (wet) and 0.6
(dry)for Machine Shop and Plate and Structural Fabrication combined and 1.0
(wet) and 0.8 (dry) for Paint Shop Waste.
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I
Total Annual Cost, $ 287
Cost/kkg of Waste (1) (wet) $ 18
Cost/kkg of Waste (1) (dry) $ 27
Cost/yr-Production Emp., $ 17
Level II
344
21
32
20
Level III
347
21
32
20
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I:
Level II: (2)
Level II: (2)
Off-site sanitary landfilling of all process wastes by
private contractor.
Off-site recovery of waste oils through rerefining with
residues of the rerefining operation going to a sanitary
landfill. Off-site sanitary landfilling of remaining
machine shop wastes. Reclamation of solvents off-site
with still bottoms incineration followed by ash disposal
in a sanitary landfill. Incineration of paint wastes by
a private contractor with ash disposal in sanitary landfills.
Off-site recovery of waste oils through rerefining with
residues of the rerefining operation going to a secured
landfill. Off-site secured landfilling of remaining ma-
chine shop wastes. Reclamation of solvents off-site with
still bottoms incineration followed by ash disposal in a
secured landfill. Incineration of paint wastes by a private
contractor with ash disposal in a secured landfill.
Notes: (1) Total porcess waste = total potentially hazardous wastes.
(2) Waste segregation necessary.
Source: Contractor estimates.
197
-------
Office,. Computing, and Accounting
Machines Industry
A typical manufacturing plant producing office, computing, and
accounting machines (SIC 357) was defined in Section III as a
facility basically consisting of a machine shop and an assembly
operation. Process wastes are accumulated at a total rate of 14.4
kkg/year (15.9 tons/year) on a wet weight basis and 9.3 kkg/yr (10.3
tons/yr) on a dry basis. These wastes are considered potentially
hazardous by the contractor based on the criteria proposed in Section
III. As with the typical plant in SIC 355, these materials are
collected by a private contractor according to a set time schedule —
usually between once per week and once per month. As shown in Table
V-2, for Level I (most prevalent technology), these wastes are hauled
to a landfill operation. This costs the typical plant approximately
$260/year. The average treatment and disposal costs are $18/kkg
($16/ton) on a wet basis and $28/kkg ($25/ton) on a dry basis.
If Level II technology were implemented, the total potentially
hazardous waste treatment and disposal cost would be about $274/year,
or $19/kkg ($17/ton) and $29/kkg ($26/ton) on wet and dry bases,
respectively.
Level III technology for the plant would cost about the same as
Level II, with the disposal of residues taking place in secured
landfills instead of in sanitary landfills.
These costs are summarized in Table V-2.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL COSTS
Level I Technology
Level I technology is defined by EPA as the most prevalent
technology currently employed — i.e., the broad average present
treatment and disposal practice. The costs of handling, treating,
and disposing of each potentially hazardous waste of the subject
industries are discussed below0
Machine Shop Wastes
Level I technology for machine shop wastes consists of off-site
disposal in a sanitary landfill by a private contractor. As detailed
in Table V-3, the cost of this practice is $18/kkg ($16/ton) on a wet
basis. The accuracy of this figure is on the order of +_ 30 percent.
198
-------
TABLE V-2
Typical Plant Costs for Treatment and Disposal of
Potentially Hazardous Wastes, 1975 (SIC 357)
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 15 employees and is located in an urban area in
EPA Region IX. The manufacturing process is Machine Shop (with assembly).
The composition of waste derived from this process is dirty oil; waste sol-
vents; sweepings & grindings. Annual waste generation rates in kkg/product,
employee is are (wet) and 0.6 (dry).
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I
Total Annual Cost, $ 260
Cost/kkg of waste (1) (wet) $ 18
Cost/kkg of waste (1) (dry) $ 28
Cost/yr-Production Emp., $ 17
Level II
274
19
29
18
Level III
274
19
29
18
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I:
Level II:(2)
Level II:(2)
Off-site sanitary landfilling of all process wastes by
private contractor.
Off-site recovery of waste oils through rerefining with
residues of the rerefining operation going to a sanitary
landfill. Off-site sanitary landfilling of remaining
machine shop wastes. Reclamation of solvents off-site
with still bottoms incineration followed by ash disposal
in a sanitary landfill.
Off-site recovery of waste oils through rerefining with
residues of the rerefining operation going to a secured
landfill. Off-site secured landfilling of remaining ma-
chine shop wastes. Reclamation of solvents off-site with
still bottoms incineration followed by ash disposal in a
secured landfill.
Notes: (1) Total process waste = total potentially hazardous waste.
(2) Waste segregation necessary.
Source: Contractor estimates.
199
-------
TABLE V-3
Treatment and Disposal Costs for Machine
Shop Wastes in SIC 355 & 357
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 16 employees and is located in an urban area in
EPA Region V. The composition of waste derived from this process are:
coolants; sweepings and grindings; solvents. Annual waste generation rates
in kkg/product*employee are: coolants - 1.29 (wet) 0.51 (dry), sweepings and
grindings 1/25 (wet) 1.00 (dry), and solvents - 0.81 (wet), 0.50 (dry).
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I
Total Annual Cost, $ 965
Cost/kkg of Waste (wet) $ 18
Cost/kkg of Waste (dry) $ 28
Cost/yr-Production Employee $ 60
Level II
1018
19
30
63
Level III
1018
19
30
63
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I:
Level II:
Level III:
Off-site sanitary landfilling of all process wastes by pri-
vate contractor.
Off-site recovery of waste oils through rerefining with resi-
dues of the rerefining operation going to a sanitary landfill.
Off-site recovery of waste solvents through reclaiming with
incineration of still bottoms and sanitary landfilling of
resultant ash. Off-site sanitary landfilling of sweepings
and grindings.
Same as Level II, except secured landfills are used in place
of sanitary landfills.
Source: Contractor estimates.
200
-------
Electroplating Wastes
Electroplating wastes of the subject industries are
predominantly hauled by private contractors to off-site sanitary
landfills for disposal as shown in Table V-4. These wastes consist
of heavy metal sludges. The cost of this practice is $16/kkg
($15/ton) on a wet basis and $40/kkg ($38/ton) on a dry weight basis.
The principal process waste from electroplating operations is
acid/alkali rinse waters which are not currently disposed of on land.
Although they are presently sewered, pending effluent guidelines will
mean that by 1983, waste sludges from the treatment of acid/alkali
wastes will be generated and will require some form of soid waste
treatment and disposal. No Level I or Level II costs for acid/alkali
waste treatment are stated in this report since the materials are not
handled as solid wastes. It should also be noted that the quantities
of acid/alkaki wastes that are currently generated and which will be
generated in 1977 have not been included in the process waste
generation tables presented in Section III and in Appendices I and J.
Heat Treating Wastes
These wastes are currently hauled to off-site sanitary landfills
by private contractors. This constitutes Level I technology. The
costs of this practice is approximately $24/kkg ($22/ton) and $59/kkg
($54/ton) on wet weight and dry weight bases, respectively as shown
on Table V-5. Typical of the cost data in this section, these
estimates are probably accurate to + 30 percent.
Paint Shop Wastes
Level I technology for paint shop wastes consists of discarding
the combined paint sludge and solvent in off-site sanitary landfills.
This costs $10/kkg ($9/ton) on a wet basis and $13/kkg ($12/ton) on a
dry basis. These costs, along with a description of a typical paint
shop, are shown in Table V-6.
Level II Technology
Level II potentially hazardous waste treatment and disposal
technology is defined as the best technology currently employed as
found through site surveys or in the literature. Identified
technology at this level must represent the soundest process from an
environmental and health standpoint currently in use in at least one
manufacturing location.
201
-------
TABLE V-4
Treatment and Disposal Costs for Electroplating
Wastes in SIC 355 & 357
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 44 employees and is located in an urban area in
EPA Region V. Annual waste generation rates in kkg/product, employee for
each waste constituent are: heavy metal sludge 1.88 (wet, 0.44 (dry);
solvents 0.64 (wet) 0.44 (dry); acids/alkalies^ 1.00 (wet), 0.12 (dry).
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I Level II Level III
Total Annual Cost $ 40 40 208
Cost/kkg of Waste (wet) $ 16 16 59
Cost/kkg of Waste (dry) $ 40 40 148
Cost/yr-Production Employee $ 1 1 3
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I: Off-site sanitary landfilling of all process wastes by pri-
vate contractor.
Level II: Same as Level I. Solvents to reclaiming with still bottoms
to off-site sanitary landfill.
Level III: Sludge dewatering followed by secured landfilling. Solvent
reclaiming with still bottoms to off-site secured landfill.
Sludge from acid/alkali wastewater treatment to secured
landfill.
Notes: (1) Acid/alkali residues will be generated by 1983 pending the imple-
tation of effluent guidelines.
Source: Contractor estimates.
202
-------
Table V-5
Treatment and Disposal Costs for Heat
Treating Wastes in SIC 355 & 357
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 26 employees and is located in an urban area in
EPA Region V. Annual waste generation rates in kkg/product» employee for each
waste constituent are: quench oils 0.85 (wet), 0.65 (dry); cyanide Salts
0.14 (wet), 0.14 (dry); acids/alkalies 1.00 (wet), 0.12 (dry).
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I Level II Level III
Total Annual Cost $ 1248 1248 3120
Cost/kkg of Waste (wet) $ 24 24 60
Cost/kkg of Waste (dry) $ 59 59 146
Cost/yr-Production Employee $ 48 48 120
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I: Off-site sanitary landfilling of all process wastes by private
contractor.
Level II: Same as Level I.
Level III: Secured landfill for all wastes contaminated with cyanides.
Reclamation of noncontaminated oils with rerefining residues
to secured landfill.
Source: Contractor estimates.
203
-------
Table V-6
Treatment and Disposal Costs for
Paint Wastes in SIC 355 & 357
Typical Plant Characteristics
The typical plant has 14 employees and is located in an urban area in
EPA Revion V. Annual waste generation rates in kkg/product employee for
each waste constituent are: paint sludge 0.55 (wet), .43 (dry) and
solvents 0.50 (wet), .38 (dry)
Treatment/Disposal Costs Level I
Total Annual Cost $ 147
Cost/kkg of Waste (wet) $ 10
Cost/kkg of Waste (dry) $ 13
Cost/yr-Production Employee $ 10
Level II
750
51
67
54
Level III
794
54
71
57
Description of Treatment/Disposal Technology
Level I: Off-site sanitary landfilling by a private contractor.
Level II: Off-site incineration of paint sludge with ash to sanitary
landfill. Separation and reclamation of solvents with still
bottoms incineration followed by sanitary landfilling of ash.
Level III: Same as Level II except secured landfills are used in place
of sanitary landfills.
Source: Contractor estimates.
204
-------
Machine Shop Wastes
Level II technology for machine shop wastes, as shown in Table
V-3, involves segregation of oils and solvents from other waste
constituents. The rerefining of waste oil off-site by a private
contractor has been determined to be part of Level II technology.
Residues from the rerefining operations are placed in sanitary
landfills.
Solvents are reclaimed off-site with still bottoms from the
reclaiming operation being incinerated and residual ash going to a
sanitary landfill. Remaining machine shop wastes are sanitary
landfilled by a private contractor off-site.
This practice costs about $19/kkg ($17/ton) on a wet weight
basis and $30/kkg ($27/ton) on a dry weight basis. However, costs
for Level II can vary over a wide range. For example, waste oil
rerefining costs will vary depending on the amount of "Dirt" it
contains. Prices quoted for small lots of waste oil by a Midwestern
rerefining contractor are as follows:
Price Range
"Dirt" Concentration in Oil C/ liter
> 15% 0-1 1-5
11-14% 0 0
C 10% [0-2] [1-7J
(Dirt concentrations are determined mainly by visusal means)
The contractor will pay up to 2£/liter (7c/gallon) for relatively
clean oil which can be more easily rerefined. On the other hand,
some of the dirtier oils obtained may be used for road oiling instead
of rerefining. Another contractor charges $22/kkg ($20/ton) for
waste oil, which is sold in turn to rerefining operations.
In addition, a principal factor affecting the cost of solvent
reclaiming is the size or capacity of the solvent reprocessing
facility. Date from an earlier EPA report [60] showed that solvent
reclaiming costs are reduced rapidly and continuously up to a
capacity level of about 1500 kg/hr (3,300 Ibs/hr). The costs decline
much slower after this. This is illustrated in Figure V-l. These
costs do not take into account any savings incurred by manufacturing
plants in using reprocessed solvents for cleaning purposes instead of
buying and using virgin stocks.
Electroplating Wastes
Level II technology is the same as Level I, consisting of
off-site disposal in a sanitary landfill. This service, rendered by
205
-------
o
o
o
O
O
O
in
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
en
t-i
(U
o
-------
a private contractor, costs $16/kkg ($15/ton) and $40/kkg ($38/ton)
on wet and dry weight bases, respectively. Charges for sewered
alkali/acid wastes are not included in these figures, as indicated in
Table V-4.
Heat Treating Wastes
Level II treatment and disposal technology for this waste is
equivalent to Level I at $24/kkg ($22/ton) on a wet basis and $59/kkg
($54/ton) on a dry basis.
Painj^ Shop Wastes
Painting operations wastes from SIC 355 and 357 plants are
sometimes incinerated at an off-site contractor's facilities with the
ash transported to a sanitary landfill. In addition, solvents are
reclaimed, with still bottoms incinerated. Ash is deposited in
sanitary landfills. This comprises Level II technology for paint
wastes as documented in Table V-6.
The average wet weight cost is $51/kkg (46/ton).
Two of the major factors affecting the cost of this treatment
and disposal technology are (1) size of the incineration operation,
and (2) the type of incinerator used. Although the first point
cannot be quantitatively discussed using available data, it was found
that relatively large contract incineration installations serving a
number of clients could afford to charge less than smaller
incinerator installations. This is consistent with standard
cost-capacity engineering concepts.
Level III Technology
Level III technology is defined as the treatment and disposal
technology necessary to provide adequate health and environmental
protection. Level III technology may be more or less sophisticated
or may be identical to Level I or Level II technology. At this
level, identified technology may include pilot or bench scale
processes, providing the exact stage of development can be
identified.
Machine Shop Wastes
Level III technology is the same as Level II except that secured
landfills are utilized for residue disposal instead of sanitary
landfills. This does not increase the estimated cost of treatment
and disposal for Level II values which are $19/kkg ($17/ton) on a wet
basis.
207
-------
Electroplating Wastes
Sludge dewatering followed by disposal in a secured landfill is
Level III technology for heavy metal sludge. In addition, sludge
from acid/alkaline wastewater treatment facilities are deposited in
secured landfills. This practice will cost a total of $59/kkg
($54/ton) on a wet basis. Of this, $ll/kkg ($10/ton) is due to
acid/alkaline waste disposal.
Heat Treating Wastes
Level III for this waste consists of secured landfilling which
costs $60/kkg ($54/ton) on a wet weight basis and $146/kkg ($132/ton)
on a dry weight basis.
Paint Shop Wastes
Incineration of paint sludge followed by ash disposal in a
secured landfill constitutes Level III treatment and disposal
technology along with solvent segregation, reprocessing, still
bottoms incineration, and subsequent ash disposal in a secured
landfill. These practices cost $54/kkg ($49/ton).
Potentially hazardous waste treatment and disposal costs are
summarized in Table V-7.
IMPACT OP POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANACTMENT UPON THE INDUSTRIES
The total costs to treat and dispose of potentially hazardous
wastes in the special industrial machinery and office, computing, and
accounting machines industry for each of the three levels of
technology are shown in Table V-8.
The cost of Level I technology for all potentially hazardous
wastes generated at 1975 rates (excluding all nonhazardous process
wastes and nonprocess wastes such as garbage) is roughly $2.8 million
per year. Nationwide, implementation of Level II technology would
cost approximately $3.5 million. This increase is primarily due to
the additional costs involved to incinerate paint sludge wastes and
to reclaim spent solvents. No credit has been allowed for reusing
reprocessed oils and solvents. It has been assumed that all these
materials can be reprocessed, which in practice is not entirely true.
For example, solvents used to clean electronic components in office
machines are sent to solvent reclaimers after their initial use and
are not purchased back. Only virgin solvent with high quality
208
-------
Table V-7
Potentially Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal Costs
Cost, $/kkg ($/ton)(2)
Level I Level II Level III
Process _ Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry
Machine Shop 18 28 19 30 19 30
(16) (25) (17) (27) (17) (27)
Electroplating:
Heavy Metal Sludges 16 40 16 40 48 120
(15) (38) (15) (38) (44) (110)
Acid/Aklali NA NA NA
NA NA NA
Heat Treating 24 59 24 59 60 146
(22) (54) (22) (54) (54) (132)
Paint Shop 10 13 51 67 54 71
(9) (12) (46) (61) (49) (64)
Notes (1) Includes wastes from tool and die shops; stamping, blanking, and
forming operations; and plate and structural fabrication operations.
(2) The wet and dry weight factors used in deriving these waste T/D
costs are approximate and may vary with given manufacturing operations,
Source: Contractor estimates.
209
-------
Table V-8
Total National Costs to the SIC 355 and 357 Industries
for Potentially hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal
t!975)
Cost, $ thousand/year
Process Level I Level II Level III
Machine Shop 2,124 2,224 2,242
Electroplating
Heavy Metal Sludges 206 206 617
Acid/Aklali — — 141
Heat Treating 348 348 870
Paint Shop 135 688 729
Total 2,813 3,484 4,599
210
-------
specifications is used. As another example, a reprocessed oil may
not be suitable for the same high-temperature and h;Lgh-corrosion
service for which the original oil was used.
Level III technology use will cost the SIC 355 and SIC 357
industries roughly $4.6 million, a 63 percent increase over the
currently used practices. The utilization of secured landfilling
operations is an important factor which serves to establish Level III
costs.
These total national costs have been compared to the value added
by manufacture, the cost of materials, and the value of shipments in
1972 for SIC 355 and 357 combined. The results are shown in Table
V-9. The current cost for implementation of Level I technology
constitutes only 0.02 percent of the total value of shipments which
was $14.8 billion according to the 1972 Census of Manufactures [5]0
Industry-wide implementation of Level II technology would not
significantly affect the fraction of value of shipments, and the
implementation of Level III technology would only increase the cost
ratio to 0.03 percent. This shows that the impact of potentially
hazardous waste treatment and disposal costs are minimal on the
industry as a whole.
211
-------
Table V-9
Comparison of Technology Costs to
SIC 355 and 357 Industry Characteristics
Technology Costs as a Percent
of the Industry Characteristic
Industry Characteristics Level I Level II Level III
Value Added by Manufacture
($8.5 billlon/yr) 0.03 0.04 0.05
Cost of Materials
($6.3 billion/yr) 0.04 0.06 0.07
Value of Shipments
($14.8 billion/yr) 0.02 0.02 0.03
212
-------
SECTION VI
REFERENCES
1. TRW Systems Group. Recommended Methods of Reduction, Neutralization,
Recovery or Disposal ^f Hazardous Waste. EPA Study Report» 1973. 16
Volumes.
2. Versar, Inc. Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste Practices
Inorganic Chemical Industry. EPA Contract No. 68-01-2246. 1974.
(Draft Report).
3 Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories. Program for the Management
of Hazardous Wastes. EPA Contract No. 68-01-0762. 1973.
4. Arthur D. Little, Inc. Alternatives to the Management of Hazardous
Wastes at_ National Disposal Sites. EPA Contract No. 68-01-0556.
1973.
5. U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1972 Census of Manufactures. SIC 355
(MC 72(2)35D) and SIC 357 (MC 72C2)35F). Washington, 1975.
6. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1967 Census of Manufactures. SIC 355 and
SIC 357. Washington, 1970.
7 Dun & Bradstreet Listing of 6900 Manufacturing Establishments.
8. Dun & Bradstreet. 1975 Metal Working Directory.
9. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Domestic Commerce U.j.
Industrial Outlook. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office,
1975.
10. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Domestic Commerce. U.S.
Industrial Outlook. Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office,
1976.
11. PredtcastSo 1975 Annual Cumulative Edition.
12o U.S. Department of Labor. Handbook of Labor Statistics. Washington,
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste
Management Programs. Report to Congress; Disposal of Hazardous
Wastes. Environmental Protection Agency Publication SW-115.
Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.
213
-------
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Quality Criteria for Water.
Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976. (Prepublication
copy.)
15. Report of the National Technical Advisory Committee to the Secretary
of the Interior. Water Quality Criteria. 1968.
16. Gleason, M.N., et. al. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products,
Baltimore, Williams and Wilkens Co., Inc., 1969.
17. Hamilton, A., and H. S. Hardy. Industrial Toxicology. Acton, MA,
Publishing Services Group, Inc., 1974.
18. Browing, E. Toxlclty jof_ Industrial Metals, New York,
Appleton-Century- Crofts, 1969.
19. Faith, W. L., et. al. Industrial Chemicals New York, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., 1965.
20. Schroeder, H. A. Trace Metals and Chronic Diseases. In Advances in
Internal Medicine, v. 3. Year Book Publishers, Inc., 1956.
21. Sax, N. I. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. New York,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1975.
22. Plunkett, E. R. Handbook on_ Industrial Toxicology. New York,
Chemical Publishing Co., 1966.
23. Jacobs, M.B. The Analytical Toxicology of Industrial Organic Poisons
New York, Interscience Publishers, 1967.
24. Thienes, C. H., and T. J. Haley. Clinical Toxicology. Philadelphia,
Lea and Febiger, 1964.
25. National Academy of Sciences. Principles for Evaluating Chemicals in
the Environment. Washington, 1975.
26 "Flash Point of Mixed Solvents." Journal of Paint Technology, Dec.
1969.
27. American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. 8th ed. v. 5 Forging
and Casting Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.
28. Encyclopoedla of Occupational Health and safety, v. 1, "Foundries."
Geneva, International Labour Office, 1972.
29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Development Document for
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards £f_ Performance for the
Machinery and Mechanical Produces Point Source Category. Washington,
1975.
214
-------
30. Electroplating Engineering Handbook. New York, Reinhold Publishing
Co., 1962.
31 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Development Document for
Interim Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Proposed New Source
Performance Standards for the Metal Finishing Segment of the^
Electroplating Point Source Category. EPA-440/l-75/040-a.
Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.
32. Nemerow, N. L. Liquid Waste of Industry. Reading, MA, Addison
Wesley Publishing Co., 1971.
33. Encyclopoedia of Occupational Health and Safety, v. 1,"Galvanising."
Geneva, International Labour Office, 1972.
34. American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. 8th ed. v. 2. Heat
Treating, Cleaning, and Finishing. Metals Park, Ohio, 1964.
35. American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. 8th ed. v. 1.
Properties and Selection of Metals. Metals Park, Ohio. 1961.
36. American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. 8th ed. v. 3.
Machining Metals Park, Ohio, 1967.
37. Encyclopoedia of Occupational Health, and Safety, v. 1, "Grinding and
Cutting Fluids." Geneva, International Labour Office, 1972.
38. American Society for Metals. Metals Handbook. 8th. ed. v. 4.
Forming.
Metals Park, Ohio, 1969.
39. Plastics Reference Issue. Machine Design. 40(29). Dec. 12, 19680
40. Woumans, F. P. Disposal of Cold Mill Coolant. Iron and Steel
Engineer. Feb., 1962.
41. Lindenbaum, H. J. "An Oil IS .... What?" Plant Engineering. Oct.
16, 1975.
42. Lin, Y. H., and J. R. Lawson. "Treatment of Oils and
Metal-Containing Wastewater." Pollution Engineering. 1975.
43. Lund, H. F. Industrial Pollution Control Handbook. New York,
McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1971.
44. Encyclopoedia of Occupational Health and Safety, v.l."Lubricants."
Geneva, International Labour Office, 1972.
45. Ranney, M. W. "Lubricant Additives." In Specialty Lubricants. Park
Ridge, N. J., Noyes Data Corp., 1973.
215
-------
46. Rudolfs, W. (ed.) Industrial Wastes. New York, Reinhold Publishing
Corp., 1953.
47. Sittig, M. Pollutant Removal Handbook. Park Ridge, N. J., Noyes
Data Corp., 1973.
48. "Metal Cleansing Bends with Social Pressures." Iron Age. Feb. 17,
1975.
49. "Trends in Steel Pickling and Waste Acid Treatment." The Magazine of
Metals Producing. Mar. 1966.
50. Danielson, J. A. (ed.) Air Pollution Engineering Manual. 2nd ed. Los
Angeles County Air Pollution Control District/Environmental
Protection Agency, May 1973.
51. "Design Guide-Assembling with Adhestves." Machine Design. Aug. 18,
1966.
52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Development Document for
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards
for the Iron and Steel Foundry Industry. July 1975.
53. Calspan Corporation. Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste
Practices in the Metal Smelting and Refining Industry, v.3. Ferrous
Smelting and Refining. EPA Contract No. 68-01-2604. 1975.
54. Technical Bulletin A-11. No cy (Cyanide-Free) Carburizing Process.
Park Chemical Co. (Undated).
55. WAPORA, Inc. Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste Practices,
Paint and Allied Products Industry, Contract Solvent Reclaiming
Operations, and Factory Application of Coatings. Contract No0
68-01-2656. 1975.
56. Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, v.52, no. lOa. New York, McGraw-Hill,
Inc. 1975.
57. Ward, S.D. Hazardous Waste Treatment Technology Assessment - Metal
Finishing Industry. Unpublished OSWMP report, 1975.
58. Lancy, L. E. "Neutralizing Liquid Wastes in Metal Finishing." Metal
Progress. April 1967.
59. GCA/Technology Division. Waste Oil Recovery and Reuse Program -
Residue Program - Residue Management. Prepared for Maryland
Department of Environmental Services, April 1975.
216
-------
60. Battelle Columbus Laboratories. Assessment of Industrial Hazardous
Waste Practices — Electroplating and Metal Finishing Industries. EPA
Contract No. 68-01-2664. 1975 (Draft Report.)
61. Baum, B. and C. H. Parker. Incineration and Landfill, v.i. In Solid
Waste Disposal. Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., 1973.
62. Personal communication. J. E. Levin, WAPORA, Inc. to Dr. Robert Ham,
University of Wisconsin. Jan. 21, 1976.
63. WAPORA, Inc. Analysis of the Variation in the Charges for Treatment
and Disposal of Hazardous Wastes (SIC 355, 357, and 367).
Unpublished report to OSWMP.
64. Foster D. Snell, Inc. Potential for Capacity Creation in the
Hazardous Waste Management Service Industry. EPA Contract No.
68-01-3266. 1975. (Draft Report.)
65. Personal communication. Dr. Leonard Guarraia, Criteria Branch,Office
of 'Water and Hazardous Materials, EPA, March 9, 1976.
217
-------
SECTION VII
GLOSSARY
Acute Toxicity
Any poisonous effect produced within a short period of time, usually up to
24-96 hours, resulting in severe biological harm and often death.
Adsorption
The adhesion of a substance to the surface of a solid or liquid.
Adsorption is often used to extract pollutants by causing them to be
attached to such adsorbents as activated carbon or silica gel.
Hydrophobic, or water-repulsing adsorbents, are used to extract oil from
waterways in oil spills.
Annealing
A metalworking operation which reduces hardness, improves machinability,
facilitates cold working, and produces a desired microstructure.
Annealing is accomplished by heating a metal above a temperature which
changes its microstructure and then slowly cooling it down.
Aquifer
An underground bed or stratum of earth, gravel or porous stone that
contains water.
Arc Furnace
A furnace in which material is heated either directly by an electric arc
between an electrode and the material or indirectly by an arc between two
electrodes adjacent to the material.
Arc Welding
Welding with, an electric arc.
Assembly of Product
The process of bringing togethejr and attaching individual pieces and units
to form a completed product.
Baghouse
An air pollution abatement device used to trap particulates by filtering
gas streams through large fabric bags, usually made of glass fibers.
219
-------
Biodegradable
The process of decomposing quickly as a result of the action of
microorganisms.
Blanking
A process accomplished with dies in presses in which desired shapes are
cut from flat or performed stock.
Carburizing
A metalworking operation in which carbon is introduced into the surface of
low carbon steels by heating them in carbon-rich media followed by
quenching.
Carcinogen
A chemical which produces or incites cancer.
Charge
The liquid and solid materials fed into a furnace during one casting
cycle.
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
A class of generally long-lasting, broad-spectrum insecticides of which
the best known is DDT, first used for insect control during World War II.
Other similar compounds include aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor, chlordane,
lindane, endrin, mirex, benzene hexachloride (BHC), and toxaphene. The
qualities of persistence and effectiveness against a wide variety of
insect pests were long regarded as highly desirable in agriculture, public
health and home uses. But later research has revealed that these same
qualities may represent a potential hazard through accumulation in the
food chain and persistence in the environment.
Clarifier
In waste water treatment, a settling tank which mechanically removed
settleable solids from wastes.
Coining
A closed-die squeezing operation, usually performed cold, in which, all
surfaces of the work are confined or restrained, resulting in a
well-defined imprint of the die upon the work.
Cover Material
Soil that is used to cover compacted solid waste in a sanitary landfill.
220
-------
Cupola
A cylindrical vertical furnace for melting metal, especially gray iron, by
having the charge come in contact with the hot fuels, usually
metallurgical coke.
Dermal Toxicity
The ability of a chemcial to poison an animal or human by skin absorption.
Drag-out
The amount of bath solution from an electroplating operation or a molten
salt heat treating operation carried out of the bath by the material being
treated or the rack holding the material.
Drawing
Forming recessed parts by forcing the plastic flow of metal in dies;
reducing the cross section of wire or tubing by pulling it through a die.
Dump
A land site where solid waste is disposed of in a manner that does not
protect the environment.
Dust
Fine-grain particulate matter that is capable of being suspended in air.
Ecology
The interrelationships of living things to one another and to their
environment or the study of such relationships.
Electroplating i
Electrodispositio^^^E a metal or alloy from a suitable electrolyte
solution: the arl^^^m to be plated is connected as the cathode in the
electrolyte soluttf^ direct current is introduced through the anode which
consists of the metal to be deposited.
Electrostatic Precipitator
An air pollution control device that removes particulate matter by
imparting an electrical charge to particulates in a gas stream for
mechanical collection on an electrode.
Electrostatic Spray Painting
A coating application technique in which the spray nozzle is charged with
221
-------
work surface. Very high voltage at low amperage is used. Spray particles
are attracted to the work by the opposite charge, to the extent that some
of the overspray curves back and coats the reverse side of the work. Very
largely used for the application of powder coatings.
Environment
An organic coating which has a gloss like glass.
Etching
The sum of all external conditions and influences affecting the life,
development and survival of an organism.
Treating the surface of a metal to preferential chemical or electrolytic
attack in order to reveal structural details.
Facing
Milling a surface that is perpendicular to the cutter axis.
Ferrous Foundry
A commercial establishment which produces castings in which the
predominant metal is iron.
Flash Point
The temperature at which a liquid gives off vapor sufficient to form an
ignitable mixture with the air contained in the vessel used.
Flus
A material used to combine with and remove undesirable Substances such as
sand or iron oxides from molten metal or to provide a ^J^tective covering
for certain molten metal baths.
Forming
Plastic deforming material, usually hot, into desired shapes with
compressive force, with or without dies.
Forming
An operation which shapes metal by deformation.
Foundry Pattern Shop
An establishment, often part of a foundry, whiclv produces forms of wood,
metal, or other materails around which modling material such as sand is
placed to make a mold for the casting of metals.
222
-------
Galvanizing
The application of a zinc coating to steel to provide protection
against corrosion.
Gates
Scrap metal on casting surfaces created by a channel through which
molten metal enters the mold.
Hardness
Resistance to penetration.
Heat Treating of Metals
Heating and cooling of metals or alloys to obtain desired properties
or conditions.
Heavy Metals
Metallic elements with high molecular weights, generally toxic in low
concentrations to plant and animal life. Such metals are often
residual in the environment and exhibit biological accumulation.
Examples include mercury, chromium, cadmium, arsenic, and lead.
Incineration
The controlled process by which solid, liquid or gaseous combustible
wastes are burned and changed into gases; the residue produced
contains little or no combustible material.
Incinerator
An engineered apparatus used to burn waste substances and in which
all the combustion factors — temperatures, retention time,
turbulence and combustion air — can be controlled.
Inhibition
The action of chemicals where the total effect is less than the sum
of two or more effects taken independently.
Inoculant
Material added to a molten metal to aid crystallization.
Induction Furnace
An electric furnace in which the primary conductor is coiled and
generates, by electromagnetic induction, a secondary current which
develops heat within the metal charge0
223
-------
Median lethal concentration, a standard measure of toxicity.
LCSOindicates the concentration of a substance that will kill 50
percent of a group of experimental insects or animals.
Leachate
Liquid that has percolated through solid waste or other mediums and
has extracted dissolved or suspended materials from it.
Leaching
The process by which soluble materials in the soil, such as
nutrients, pesticide chemicals or contaminants, are washed into a
lower layer of soil or are dissolved and carried away by water.
Machine Shop
A workshop in which work, metal or other material, is machined to
specified size. Machining is the process of removing material from
the item in the form of chips through the use of a machine and
cutting tools.
Maintenance
The function responsible for the upkeep of facilities and equipment.
Metal
Any of a large group of substances (such as steel, iron, or bronze)
that typically show a characteristic luster, are good conductors of
electricity and heat, or opaque, can be fused, and are usually
malleable or ductile.
Milling Machine
A rotary cutting tool provided with one or more cutting elements,
called teeth, which intermittently engage the workpiece and remove
material by relative movement of the workpiece and cutter.
Moisture Content
The weight loss (expressed in percent) when a sample of material is
dried to a constant weight at a temperature of 105°C.
Mold
A shaped cavity for casting.
224
-------
Mutagen
A chemical which can cause a permanent change in hereditary materail
involvelng a physical change in chromosome relations or a biochemical
change in the codons (a triplet of nucleotides that is part of the
genetic code and that specifies a particular amino acid in a protein
or stops or starts protein synthesis) that makes up genes.
N.E.C
Also written as n.e.c. - Not elsewhere classified.
Nonferrous Die Casting
The forming of castings in dies, as opposed to foundry molds, of
metals other than iron and its alloys.
Nonferrous Foundry
A commercial establishment which produces castings of metals other
than iron and its alloys.
Normalizing
A term usually applied to ferrous alloys, involving heating the work
piece to a suitable temperature above the transformation range and
then cooling it in air to a temperature substantially below the
transformation range
Nitriding
Introduction of nitrogen to the surface of a steel to change the
surface properties.
N.S.K.
Not specified by kind.
Oil
An organic substance, or class of substances, usually insoluble with
water.
Open-Hearth Furnace
A reverberatory melting furnace with a shallow hearth and a low roof.
The flame passes over the charge on the hearth, causing the charge to
be heated both by direct flame and by radiation from the roof and
sidewalls of the furnace.
225
-------
Organic Solvent
A carbon-based liquid or class of liquids, used in the special
machines manufacturing industry to remove oil, grease, and dirt from
metal work.
Organism
Any living human, plant, or animal.
Painting,Lacquering, Enameling on Metals
The process of applying an organic coating on metal surfaces.
£H
A measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a material; pH is
represented on a scale of 0 to 14 with 7 representing a neutral
state, 0 representing the most acid and 14, the most alkaline.
Pickling
Removing surface oxides from metals by chemical or electrochemical
reaction.
Plastics Molding
The process of forming shapes of plastic materials using dies.
Plate or Structural Fabrication
The production of products made of steel plates and other steel
structural shapes such as sheet, angles, channels, I-beams.
Processes involved include shearing, gas-cutting, punching, forming,
welding, riveting.
Pollutant
Any introduced gas, liquid or solid that makes a resource unfit for a
specific purpose.
Pollution
The presence of matter or energy whose nature, location or quantity
produces undesirable environmental effects.
Pollution Abatement
The method of reducing the degree or intensity of pollution,
including the use of such a method.
226
-------
Potentially Hazardous Waste
Any waste or combination of wastes which pose a substantial present
or potential hazard to human health or living organisms because such
wastes are lethal, nondegradable, or persistent in nature; may be
biologically magnified; or may otherwise cause or tend to cause
detrimental cumulative effects.
Press Brake
An open-frame single-action press used to bend, blank, corrugate,
curl, notch, perforate, pierce, or punch sheet metal or plate.
Printed Circuit Board
The board in electronic equipment which provides a base for
point-to-point wiring of components. A conductive substance,
frequently copper, is applied to a synthetic base such as epoxy or
bakelite and a pattern is then etched or photographically printed on
the surface to provide a wiring grid.
Process
An integral part of special machinery manufacturing operations.
Processes include casting, forging, electroplating, heat treating,
machining, coating, plastics molding and assembly. In the context of
this report, a process is the basic source of manufacturing wastes
and is used as the common unit for quantifying wastes collectively on
state, regional, and national bases.
Process Waste
Residual material emanating directly from manufacturing processes
which may contain oil, solvents, acids and alkalies, metal and
metallic compounds, and paint, among other constituents.
Pro cess Waste Stream
Used synonymously with the terms "waste" and "process waste."
Reverberatory Furnace
A furnace with a shallow hearth with a roof which deflects the flame
and radiates heat toward the hearth or the surface of the charge.
Riser
Excess metal on a casting created by a reservoir of molten metal to
provide additional metal to the casting as required before and during
solidification.
227
-------
Sanitary Landfilling
A method of waste disposal on land in a manner that protects the
environment; waste is spread in thin layers, compacted to the
smallest practical volume and covered with soil at the end of each
working day.
Scrubber
An air pollution control device that uses a liquid spray to remove
pollutants from a gas stream by absorption or chemical reaction.
Scrubbers also reduce the temperature of the emission.
Secured Landfill
Land disposal facilities characterized by inpervious contaminant of
wastes with provisions for monitoring and treating leachate if
required.
Shaw Process
A heat process used to prepare two types of ceramic molds for
castings. One is a one-piece all ceramic mold; the other is a less
expensive composite mold consisting of a layer of fericlay back up
material with a thin ceramic facing.
Shipping Including Pack and Crate
The process of preparing product for shipment to purchaser through
use of various packing materials or wood crates, and physically
loading product into trucks or railroad cars.
Sludge
A semi-solid and generally viscuous material.
Spot Welding
Welding, generally resistance welding of lapped parts, in which
fusion is confined to a relatively small circular area.
Sprues
Scrap metal on casting surfaces created in the shape of a channel
through which molten metal is poured.
Stamping, Blanking, and Forming of Metals
Stamping and blanking involve the use of presses and dies to remove
228
-------
various shapes from metal sheets or plates; forming involves the use
of presses and dies to change the shape or contour of a metal part
without intentionally altering the thickness.
Swarf
Metal grindings and floor sweepings.
Synergism
A cooperative action of chemicals so that the total effect is greater
than the sum of two or more effects taken independently.
Teratogen
A chemical which can cause malformations, monstrosities, or serious
deviations from the normal type in organisms.
Thermoplastic Resin
A polymeric material that softens with increased temperature.
Examples are cellulose acetate and polyethylene.
Thermosetting Resin
A polymeric material which does not soften, but rather polymerizes
further with increasing temperature such as phenolic resins.
Toxic Substance
Chemicals considered dangerous to health and the environment, such as
phenols, arsenic, and cyanides.
Turning
Removing metal from a rotating workpiece by means of a toolo
Vacuum
Condensation of thin metal coatings on the cool surface of a metal
piece in a vacuum.
Waste Constituent
A component of a waste such as oil, solvent, paint, metal and
metallic compounds, acid and alkalies, among others. Constituents
may also include heavy metal salts, cyanide salts, etc.
229
-------
Welding
Joining two or more pieces of material by applying heat, pressures,or
both, with or without filler material to produce a localized union
through fusion or recrystallization across the interface.
Workpiece
Usually a metal part subjected to machining or surface treatment.
230
-------
APPENDIX A
SIC 355 - SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, EXCEPT
METALWORKING MACHINERY
PRODUCTS PRODUCED
Industries and Products
SIC Code
3551 FOOD PRODUCTS MACHINERY
35511 — Dairy and Milk Products Plant Machinery and Equipment,
Except Bottling and Packaging Machinery
35511 15 Washing and sterilizing equipment
35511 43 Pasteurizers
35511 51 Homogeriizers
35511 73 Ice cream freezers
35511 83 Butter and cheese processing plant machinery and
equipment
35511 91 Dry milk processing plant machinery and equipment
35511 98 Other dairy and milk products processing plant
machinery and equipment, excluding packaging
machinery, but including cream separators
(capacity over 1,500 pounds per hour)
3552 TEXTILE MACHINERY
35521 — Textile Machinery
Fiber-to-fabric textile machinery (except parts,
attachments, and accessories):
35521 15 Cleaning and opening machinery, including
picker, garnetting, and other
35521 25 Carding and combing machines
35521 36 Drawing and roving frames
Spinning frames:
35521 42 Frames
35521 46 Spindles
Twisting frames:
35521 47 Frames
35521 48 Spindles
Yarn preparing machines:
35521 51 Winding machines (skein, bobbin, quill, cone,
etc.)
35521 53 Other yarn preparing machines (beaming, warping,
warp typing, warp drawing in, slashing, etc.)
35521 55 Other fiber-to-fabric machinery
A-l
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
TEXTILE MACHINERY (Continued)
Fabric machinery (except parts, attachments, and
accessories)
35521 65 Power looms (including looms operating without
shuttles), all types including cotton and
synthetic broadlooms
Knitting machines
35521 72 Hosiery (circular and full-fashioned)
35521 73 Double knit knitting machinery
35521 77 Warp knitting machines
35521 79 Other knitting machines
35521 84 Other fabric machinery, including lace, embroidery,
braiding, and tufting machinery and hand looms
35521 85 Bleaching, dyeing, and finishing machinery
35521 87 Machinery for drying stocks, yarns, cloth, etc.
35521 98 Other textile industry machinery, n.e.c.
(except parts, attachments, and accessories)
35522 — Parts and Attachments for Textile Machinery
35522 11 Textile machinery turnings and shapes (bobbins,
shuttles, spools, picker sticks, etc.)
Parts and attachments
Fiber-to-fabric machinery
35522 22 Card clothing
35522 31 Other fiber-to-fabric machinery, except card
cloth
35522 41 Power looms
35522 45 Knitting machines, excluding needles
35522 53 Fabric machinery, except power looms and
knitting machines
35522 71 Bleaching, dyeing, and finishing machinery
35522 98 Other textile industries machinery
35522 00 Parts and attachments for textile machinery, n.s.k.
3553 WOODWORKING MACHINERY
35531 — Woodworking Machinery (Except Home Workshop),
Including Parts and Attachments
35531 12 Sawmill equipment
35531 15 Veneer and plywoodmaking, woodbox, and crate-
making machinery
35531 62 Sawing machines, except sawmill equipment and
chain saws
35531 67 Chain saws
A-2
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
WOODWORKING MACHINERY—Continued
35531 71 Jointers, matchers, molders, mortisers, shapers,
and tenoners, except power-driven hand-held
tools
35531 81 Parts, attachments, and accessories for wood-
working machinery (sold separately), excluding
sawblades
35531 98 Other woodworking machinery (except power-driven
hand-held tools), including lathes, planing
machines, and surfacing machines, except
hand-held
35531 00 Woodworking machinery (except home workshop)
including parts and attachments, n.s.k.
35532 — Woodworking Machinery for Home Workshop (Except Power-
Driven Handtools), Including Parts and Attachments
35532 21 Saws, including circular
35532 81 Parts, attachments, and accessories for machine
tools and woodworking machines designed pri-
marily for home workshops, etc. (sold sepa-
rately), except parts for power-driven handtools
(excluding sawblades)
35532 98 Other machine tools and woodworking machines de-
signed primarily for home workshops, etc.
(except power-driven handtools), planers, and
shapers
3554 PAPER INDUSTRIES MACHINERY
Pulp and Paper Industries Machinery (New)
35540 11 Wood preparation equipment, including barkers,
chippers, knotters, splitters, chipscreens, etc.
Pulp mill machinery
35540 21 Grinders (for groundwood)
35540 25 Deckers, thickeners, wet lap machines, bleaching
equipment, pulp screens, washers, and save-alls
35540 29 Other pulpmill machinery, including digesters
and recovery room equipment
Papermill machinery
35540 31 Beaters, jordans, and other stock preparation
Paper machines
35540 45 Calenders, including supercalendars
35540 41 Fourdriniers, including yankee machines
35540 43 Cylinder-type machines
35540 49 Other paper machinery, including forming and
finishing machinery, but excluding calendars
A-3
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
PAPER INDUSTRIES MACHINERY (Continued)
Paper and paperboard converting equipment
35540 51 Bagmaking machines, including shipping sack
machines, and envelope making machines
35540 53 Corrugated boxmaking machines
35540 54 Box, carton, and shipping container making
machines, except corrugated box machines
35540 56 Toilet roll and napkin making machines
35540 59 Other paper and paperboard converting equipment,
including drum, can and tube making machines
Rebuilt Pulp and Paper Industries Machinery
35540 71 Rebuilt paper machines, including Fourdriniers,
yankees, cylinders, and forming machines
35540 75 Other rebuilt pulp and paper industries machinery
35540 81 Parts and attachments for pulp mill, papermill,
and paper converting machinery and equipment,
sold separately
3555 PRINTING TRADES MACHINERY
35551 — Printing Presses, Offset Lithographic
Sheet-fed
Single color
35551 21 From 22 inches up to and including 36
inches maximum sheet size
35551 22 Over 36 inches maximum sheet size
Multicolor, including perfecting 2- and 3-color:
35551 24 From 22 inches up to and including 36 inches
maximum sheet size
35551 25 Over 36 inches maximum sheet size
Multicolor, including perfecting, 4-color and
over:
35551 28 From 22 inches up to and including 36 inches
maximum sheet size
35551 29 Over 36 inches maximum sheet size
Web-fed
35551 32 Newspaper
35551 33 Business form presses
35551 35 Commercial (including heat-set)
35551 36 All other
35552 — Printing Presses, Other Than Lithographic
Letterpress (typographical, relief)
35552 16 Sheet-fed, including platen, cylinder, and
rotary types
A-4
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
PRINTING TRADES MACHINERY (Continued)
Web-fed
35552 18 Commercial
35552 19 Newspaper
35552 37 Gravure, sheet-fed and web-fed
35552 38 Flexographic, sheet-fed and web-fed 15-100
35552 41 Other printing presses, including metal decorat-
ing, proof, and rebuilt
35553 — Typesetting Machinery and Equipment
Typesetting machinery and equipment (excluding
justifying typewriters)
35553 43 Photographic typesetting machine, including
integral computer
35553 45 Keyboard input devices
35553 51 Hot metal typesetting machines
35553 53 Matrices for hot metal machines
35553 54 Matrices for phototypesetting machines
35553 56 Other typesetting machines (excluding cameras)
35554 — Bindery Equipment
Binding machinery and equipment, except papercut-
ting, collating, or gathering machines
35554 63 Saddle binding equipment
35554 64 Perfect and hard case (edition) binding equipment
35554 65 Other binding machinery and equipment, n.e.c.,
including folding equipment
35555 — Other Printing Trades Machinery and Equipment and
Parts and Attachments for All Printing Trades
Machinery and Equipment
35555 62 Electrotyping and sterotyping machinery and
equipment
35555 61 Other printing industry pre-press preparatory
equipment, including photocomposing equipment,
etching equipment, etc. (excluding typesetting
equipment and cameras)
35555 66 Paper cutting machines
35555 67 Collating and/or gathering machines (sold sepa-
rately)
35555 69 Engravers' material and equipment, including
metalplates, etc.
Other printing machinery and equipment, including
parts, attachments, and accessories for printing
trades machinery and equipment (sold separately)
A-5
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
PRINTING TRADES MACHINERY (Continued)
Rollers and blankers and printers' rolls and
platens
35555 71 Rubber and plastic
35555 73 Other
35555 74 Platens, excluding typewriter
35555 75 Foundry type, rules, leads, slugs, borders,
and ornaments
35555 83 Parts, attachments, and accessories for printing
presses (sold separately), including flying
pasters, dryers, folders, and reels
35555 85 Parts, attachments, and accessories for type-
setting machines (sold separately)
35555 87 Parts, attachments, and accessories for binder
equipment (sold separately)
35555 89 Parts, attachments, and accessories for other
printing trades machinery and equipment
(sold separately)
35555 98 Other printing trades machinery and equipment
3559 SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, N.E.C.
35591 11 Chemical manufacturing industries machinery and
equipment, and parts
35592 — Foundry Machineryand Equipment
35592 21 Foundry pouring equipment, including ladles,
crucibles, and pouring machines
Molding machines
35592 33 Green sand
35592 35 Other
Blast cleaning machines
35592 53 Airless, hydraulic, and pneumatic
35592 55 Tumbling and finishing machines
35592 41 Foundry flasks
35592 98 Other foundry machinery, including core-making
machines and parts for foundry machinery and
equipment
35593 — Plastics-Working Machinery and Equipment, Excluding
Patterns and Molds
35593 11 Compression molding machines
35593 33 Extrusion machines
35593 51 Injection molding machines
35593 61 Blow molding machines
35593 98 Other plastics-working machinery and equipment,
including parts for plastics-working machinery
A-6
-------
SIC Code Industries and Products
SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, N.E.C. (Continued)
35593 11 Compression molding machines
35593 33 Extrusion machines
35593 51 Injection molding machines
35593 61 Blow molding machines
35593 98 Other plastics-working machinery and equipment,
including parts for plastics-working machinery
35594 — Rubber-Working Machinery and Equipment, Excluding
Tire Molds
35594 11 High-intensity solids mixers
35594 31 Extruding machines
35594 41 Vulcanizing presses
35594 51 Tire-building equipment, except tire molds
35594 71 Tire recapping and repairing machinery and
equipment, including recapping vulcanizers
35594 98 Other rubber-working machinery, including caleder-
ing machines and parts for rubber-working
machinery, but excluding tire molds
35595 — Other Special Industry Machinery and Equipment
35595 11 Petroleum refinery machinery and equipment,
including parts
35595 21 Ammunition and explosives loading machinery and
equipment, and parts
Tobacco manufacturing machinery and equipment
35595 31 Cigarette and cigarmaking machines
35595 33 Cigarette, cigar, and tobacco packaging and
wrapping machines
35595 39 Other tobacco manufacturing machinery and
equipment, and parts
35595 41 Clayworking machinery and equipment, and parts
(brick, tile, and ceramics)
35595 43 Cementmaking machinery and equipment and parts,
other than cement kilns
Concrete products machinery and equipment
35595 45 Concrete block machines
35595 49 Other concrete products machinery and equipment
and parts, including concrete pipemaking
machines
Glassmaking machinery and equipment
35595 51 Bottle-forming machines
35595 55 Other glassmaking machinery and equipment and
parts, except lehrs
A-7
-------
SIC Code
35595 62
35595 73
35595 81
35595 85
35595 89
Industries and Products
35595 91
35595 92
35595 93
35595 00
SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, N.E.C. (Continued)
Shoemaking and repairing machinery and equipment
and parts, including sole stitching machines
Cotton ginning machinery and equipment and parts
Metal cleaning, degreasing, finishing, and drying
machinery and equipment and parts
Electronic tubemaking machinery and equipment
and parts
Other special industry machinery and equipment
and parts, including incandescent lampmaking,
paintmaking, stoneworking, hatmaking, leather-
working, jewelers', pharmaceutical, etc.
Electric nonmetallic processing industrial
furnaces and ovens, including kilns and lehrs
Fuel-fired kilns (cement, wood, and chemical
processing)
Other nonmetallic processing industrial furnaces
and ovens and parts, including kilns and lehrs
Other special industry machinery and equipment,
n.s.k.
Source: 1972 Census of Manufactures.
n.e.c. - not elsewhere classified.
n.s.k. - not specified by kind.
A-8
-------
APPENDIX B
SIC 357 - OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINES
PRODUCTS PRODUCED
Industries and Products
SIC Code
m
3772 TYPEWRITERS (See SIC 3579)
3573- — ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT
35731 00 Electronic Computers
Digital
35731 11 General purpose
35731 13 Special purpose
35731 22 Analog
35731 25 Hybrid
35732 00 Peripheral Equipment for Electronic Computers
35732 32
35732 34
35732 36
35732 38
35732 41
35732 51
35732 53
35732 55
35732 61
35732 63
35732 65
35732 71
Auxiliary storage equipment
Direct access storage units such as magnetic
disk and drum, and magnetic card and bulk
core memory
Serial access auxiliary storage units such as
magnetic tape units
Input-output equipment
Card key entry devices
Magnetic media key entry devices
Systems oriented punched card equipment
Optical scanning devices
Magnetic ink recognition devices
Graphic displays
Printers
Industrial control input-output equipment in-
cluding analog-to-digital converters, digital-
to-analog converters, and sensor interfaces
All other input-output devices including plot-
ters, paper tape readers, paper tape punches,
etc., and off-line punched card equipment,
such as tabulators, collators, sorters, and
interpreters
Computer terminals
Alphanumeric display terminals based on CRT
displays, typically include keyboard and
sometimes a serial printer or type cassette
(usually designed to operate with voice grade
communication facilities)
B-l
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT (Continued)
35732 73 Multifunction terminals
35732 75 Special purpose terminals
Digital communications interface equipment
35732 81 Line interface equipment, such as modems
(adapters, data sets)
35732 83 Multiplexors, including frequency division
and time division multiplexors
35732 89 Other types of peripheral equipment
35733 — Parts and Attachments for Electronic Computing
Equipment
3574- — CALCULATING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINES
35741 — Adding and Calculating Machines, Except Electronic
Adding machines
35741 21 10 keyboard (hand and electric)
35741 27 Full keyboard, hand and electromechanical
Calculating machines
35741 31 Printing calculators
35741 35 Rotary and key-driven calculators, hand and
electromechanical
35742 — Electronic Calculating Machines
General and/or commercial types
35742 36 Display
35742 37 Printing
35742 38 Technical and/or scientific types
35743 — Accounting Machines and Cash Registers
35743 11 Accounting and bookkeeping machines, including
billing machines with accounting registers
and electronic accounting machine-type data
terminals
35743 51 Cash registers, including adding machines with
cash drawers
35743 53 Electronic cash register type point of sale
retail devices, including data capturing
control registers
35743 61 Coded document sorting machines (excluding
punchcard equipment)
B-2
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
CALCULATING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINES (Continued)
35743 95 Rebuilt adding, calculating accounting machines,
and cash registers
35743 41 Coin and currency handling machines
35743 98 Other calculating and accounting machines ex-
cept electronic computers and peripheral
equipment for electronic computing systems,
n.e.c.
35745 — Parts and Attachments for Adding, Calculating,
Accounting Machines and Cash Registers
35745 10 Produced by complete machine manufacturers
35745 31 Produced by other than complete machine manufac-
turers
3576 SCALES AND BALANCES
35760 13 Motor truck scales
35760 15 Railroad truck scales
Industrial Scales
35760 21 Bench and portable
35760 23 Floor scales, including built-in dormant
35760 25 Predetermined weighing and check weighing
scales, all types, except automatic bulk
material weighers, fillers, and batching
proportioners
35760 27 Automatic bulk material weighers, predetermined
weight type, for weighing, filling, batching,
and proportioning
35760 29 Miscellaneous industrial scales, including
special purpose, crane, suspension, tank,
hopper, force measuring devices, and conveyor
scales (weigh and feed) for bulk materials
Retail and Commercial Scales
35760 31 Computing
35760 35 Miscellaneous, including noncomputing counter,
cotton beams and steel yards, egg-grading
scales, and hanging scales for retail use
Household and Person Weighing Scales
35760 41 Bathroom
35760 45 Person weighing scales (coin operated and free
weighing) and miscellaneous household scales,
including kitchen, baby scales, etc.
B-3
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
SCALES AND BALANCES (Continued)
35760 51 Mailing and parcel post scales
35760 82 Accessories and attachments (sold separately)
35760 84 Parts for scales and balances sold for assembly
elsewhere, repair, service, etc.)
3572 TYPEWRITERS
3579 OFFICE MACHINES, N.E.C.
35793 00 Duplicating machines
Spirit
35793 11 Hand
35793 12 Electric
35793 16 Offset
Stencil
35793 13 Hand
35793 14 Electric
35793 19 Other, -including gelatin and ribbon and ink
35794 00 Dictating, Transcribing, and Recording Machines
35794 21 Systems
35794 23 Desk units
35794 25 Portable units
35794 28 Transcribing units, excluding systems tapes
35794 29 Other types
35795 00 Mailing,Letter Handling, and Addressing Machines
35795 41 Mailing machines, including mail sorting machines,
mail typing (bundling) machines, mail cancelling
(post office) machinery, postage meters, postal
permit mailing machines, stamp affixers
35795 43 Letter and envelope handling machines, including
envelope stuffing and sealing machines, letter
opening machines, letter inserting machines,
letter folding, stuffing, and sealing machines
35795 45 Collating machines
35795 47 Addressing machines, including address labeling
machines, addressing plates, addressing plate
embossers, and addresser-printer machines
35796 00 All Other Office Machines, N.E.C.
35796 31 Check handling machines
35796 32 Electric stapling machines (office type)
35796 33 Time recording and time stamp machines
35796 34 Forms handling equipment, including bursters,
decollators, imprinters, autographic registers
B-4
-------
SIC Code
Industries and Products
35796 98
35797 —
35797 20
35797 01
35797 03
35797 05
35797 12
35797 40
35798 —
35798 20
35798 40
35798 50
TYPEWRITERS
OFFICE MACHINES, N.E.C. (continued)
All other office machines not elsewhere classi-
fied, including shorthand writing machines,
pencil sharpeners, stapling machines (except
electric), papercutters, rebuilt office, com-
puting, and accounting machines not elsewhere
classified
Typewriters
Typewriters, including coded media, except parts
and attachments
Standard (nonportable)
Electric
Nonelectric
Standard portable (including electric)
Specialized typewriters and typewriter principal
machines
Parts and Attachments for Typewriters, Sold Separately
Parts and Attachments for Addressing, Dictating,
Duplicating and Other Office and Store Machines,
N.E.C.
Parts and attachments for duplicating machines,
sold separately
Parts for dictating equipment
Parts and attachments for office machines,
n.e.c., except duplicating machines and dic-
tating equipment
(1) Reported jointly in 1972 Census data
n.e.c. - not elsewhere classified.
n.s.k. - not specified by kind.
Source: 1972 Census of Manufactures.
B-5
-------
00
§
1
•rl
£
U
&
1
4J
U
a
§
X
HJ
O
O
3
4J
93
O
0
N
CO
J3
«
0
4J
CO
•rl
4
W
4
5
Ctt
1
u
5
0
j=
00
-H
£
i
4J
.
•a 3
•9 o
•o «
«g
•3S
>
09
V
O
rH
|
a
i-i
•*
a
4
E
<
1
«
•^
X
<(
4.
a
n.
8
V
8
£
15
^^ 4
•-•rH
3s
u
a
£
H.
s5
4J
c
CD
S
o.
C (0
O V-
r-tfH
ss
u
§
fw
0)
D-
IS
r-l i-(
rH>H
ss
4J
2
0)
V C
g to
1
^
s
a
«
a.
u
01
•Q
S
OQ
4)
0)
^
gj o.
?fl
o S3
•4
OJ*M
5°
V
*
O fH rH »* rH O rH *-
rH *H
oo cn ^ CM t*« «H <4 ON oo vo^r^rH o** CT> «•
rH fH CM en O\ rH CM r» rH rH en C*
CM CM
rH rH
§*n r^- o co co rH CM r*» CM oo r*« CM co ^o f*
rHrHinpH^rHinOO CM rH en CO O P
rH
OrHrHincMincMenao OrHCMsfrnen^
O rH rH CO r-t rH O rH rH i"
rH ,H
r^ inr^coaoeMOcoo vo CM CM rH O O e*
rH in\ooej\incMtn\o cr* enr*vrcor-.r-
rH CM -oo r^enr^^encou
en (ri
OinenenmocMcM m CT* oo P* en r-
O COCMI^O^OO^CMrH O r* vO 'O CO O*> V
OCMrHrHrHrH SeMrHrHrH
rH ,_|
ooen«oo^eneMCNinoo co ^ oo (•*• co *?• u
ooo^cOfH(np*.vOf-4 r* m CN (jv cs m p
* iH rH rH in rH -H
E
a
c
I
r-lS CT CT> CT. 5 §1 » " '
1/1 ^ ^^i-i-^ose^^as e i-isfff»i-<HCMinOino 2 -i ox
5 O ** M3 O rH Hi ^ CO O en rH
4 CM rH rH O CMfH^
Tf^vO*^ orN.eNocor^ o\co>^mcMenenvo
ao^vorv & »Henoej\cMCMC7N
rH
oinooen en^o*cnooso^o
^CMrH^O OCMinO^OinCM^rH
*O>OOOO CO CMCMMSenrH
CM rH
D -* m •* CDCMr*O\rH-tfenvO
3 p^. in rH O CM en rH rH *M3enenmeMCM
CM
4) H CU
14 U tH
h en o 4 "^ M
i i o m <0 4J i i i i i i i o
m Z o
5 O O O f^ A HrHiOOOOOOO
> m o o oc rHcMinomo
4tNinoOC HcMin
«H* W^ifi
1
i
-------
rH CD
50)
-a
•g.2
4
Materials
U-l
0
4J
on
3
x
*s
•°3
ii
<
OB
0)
s
5
&
p.
u
g
01
h
IS
•^4 81
»H r-4
<-H rH
£2
w
£
S
V
P-t
s .*
O M
35
rH rH
sa
y
§
8
a*
§a
_ a
iH (0
r-l r-4
rH rH
•H O
X Q
u
§
u
V
« i.
4J 0
"1
£
c
!
j>"i
OOJ
z6
s<
4
*
ao-^voencMinoootf- GmOinoo^ov^
O«*CMCnOOOm'**'*^ cSrHrH<^rveMOO*^CTv
O C4,H,HCM O enrHCM
•H ^
-^ ^cMcnror^tntncn rH cMenoomtOoooo%
03 ,HrHf-*CM O tHvOrHcnm
CM
OOrHCMOOCTvONOOin inmrHOOoO^OOv
6 CMenOOCMCMCMtO OfHCMinOOOOOrHrH
O rHCMCMCM O rHfHCMcn
rH -•
oo cnenm*no*-*rHoo "i cMenoo^ooointo
PN. «rH 9s enr^o^torxcMinto
^ pHF-ienen^ m rHCMCM-^^rx
rH f
cMr-rH^^tcMOoo invor»voor*cnso
OO«*inrHICMrH P^OOO^OO^CMrH
C^l in CM rH
ti ^
8 tr
•5 §
•g «> 3 £ &y.
S cno>a« »«o"w
sf O>0>0«.sr»JE ,«3 O-OICK-JOSS ~3z
S2 « -»0<-H o «*
rH rH cn rH rH
rH rH
Cn rH r*. rH -*
tH rH CM 00 GO
.H r*. ej» rH r«*
rH rH en O O
tH rH
^ m oo so CM
O\ m rH rH 00
CM ** O *O r*»
rH CM CM
CM o* o m m
rH rH » r»
oo o-\ - o M
00 0 ON
rH M rH
in o* oo
*O rH oo
00 O4 m
>» <0 3
IV rH o,
00 2 c**
rH CN ,4
<» cn ,_,
i
S8 i
CM
f
5.
S
10
a
(0
«
M
p
U
U
J3
g
$
sM
O
0)
i
t*.
O>
rH
a)
g
*
-------
s
g
y
si
- • * -
* "
g
mtft^OOBinftrttf*
ill
:=i
-
> SSI
* —(«
'il
^
•s
•^ «
II
O en*r*.
II
So
-9 o «n ^
•« »4fslQ<«
I S 2 i S S S
II
w
o«n
wo
s.F<
5 ...... • . 8 s
«-* «
«
g -
A 4)
ON U.
*. a
f i r ( r
D-l
-------
00 00 00 CM
§s
u-i vO
o CM m
f>. rH SO CM
O -*
PH r-4 cn O
00 r-H rH vO
CM rH tn O
g
o
§2
r^ CM r* in
.£ D
T3 3
V u
T3 O
•O 0)
•SIM
3
CU C!
.34
O 00 rH 00
•
O rH
CM cn
oo P"-.
00* CM
ON CM in cn
OHJ
5°
M
C
I
o co
o 0)
< C
rH «tf ON CM -fl"
1 1 1 1 1
O O O O O
rH CM tf*i O U^
rH CM
D-2
0)
1^
o
Z
o
o
o
m
4J
a.
u
j w >•
•vrl
vO CO O
r- a w
m y q)
cn C w
y55
C/l CQ »3
CD
01
V
U
W
ON
ON O* O* *•}"
rH ^f C7* rH
-------
Age Distribution of Manufacturing Establishments
SIC 3551 Food Product! Machinery
States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
national
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VHI
DC
X
EPA
Region
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
'III
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Age Range (Years)
1-10
2
0
0
3
66
4
6
0
17
7
2
1
44
11
9
10
2
3
0
4
12
5
11
0
a
0
5
0
0
17
0
32
4
1
14
1
7
9
2
1
0
3
7
6
1
6
9
0
18
0
370
21
49
19
36
103
14
32
11
68
17
11-20
0
0
0
1
46
0
4
2
6
2
0
3
23
6
8
5
1
3
0
7
7
4
13
0
4
0
2
0
0
12
0
15
0
1
11
0
3
11
0
1
0
2
5
1
1
0
2
0
11
0
223
12
27
20
12
68
9
19
2
46
8
21-50
0
0
0
0
47
2
3
0
2
7
0
1
29
a
6
4
2
4
1
3
7
14
7
0
5
0
1
0
1
11
0
48
5
0
25
4
6
14
0
0
0
1
8
2
1
0
6
1
20
0
306
13
59
18
17
108
16
11
4
47
13
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
a
2
i
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
4
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
_o
41
4
5
5
0
22
0
1
0
4
0
Non-
Avallable
0
0
0
1
27
1
4
0
6
3
I
0
26
4
4
6
2
0
0
3
4
4
5
0
7
0
1
0
0
3
0
14
3
0
16
0
2
6
0
3
0
3
4
1
0
6
3
0
17
0
195
8
17
20
20
72
5
IB
2
28
5
SIC 3551
Total
2
0
0
5
190
7
19
2
31
19
3
5
130
31
28
25
7
10
1
23
31
31
37
0
24
0
9
0
1
44
0
113
12
2
70
5
18
44
2
5
0
9
24
10
4
12
20
I
69
0
1,135
58
157
82
85
368
4A
86
19
193
43
SIC 3552 Textile Machinery
Age Range (Years)
1-10
2
0
0
1
11
5
4
0
5
26
1
0
9
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
26
3
2
0
0
0
1
1
4
18
0
20
52
0
1
1
1
16
6
26
0
6
1
1
0
3
4
0
1
_o
263
41
38
20
119
17
3
1
6
13
5
11-20
1
0
1
0
2
0
4
0
1
13
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
15
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
14
37
0
0
0
0
a
9
12
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
141
30
29
9
67
3
0
0
0
3
0
21-50
1
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
1
12
0
0
6
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
32
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
24
0
22
40
0
5
0
0
13
8
12
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
4
0
198
46
46
14
68
18
1
1
0
3
1
31 and up
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
4
3
0
1
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J>
35
14
7
3
6
2
0
3
0
0
0
Non-
Available
5
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
3
10
0
0
5
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
12
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
8
20
0
0
0
0
9
8
27
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
126
21
12
11
69
6
1
2
0
4
0
SIC 3552
Total
9
0
2
1
19
5
11
0
10
63
1
0
22
3
1
2
6
1
3
2
95
6
2
0
3
0
1
1
7
64
0
68
152
0
7
1
1
49
34
78
0
11
2
1
2
5
5
1
6
0
763
152
132
57
329
46
5
7
6
23
6
E-l
-------
SIC 3553 Woodworking Machinery
Stataa
Alabama
Alaaka
Arizona
Arkantaa
Calltornla
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Until
Idaho
Illlnola
Indiana
lo«a
Kanaaa
Kentucky
Loulalana
Malna
Maryland
Maaaachuaatti
Michigan
Mltmaiota
Mlaaiaaippi
Mlaaourl
Montana
Nabraaka
Nevada
Sew Hanpehlra
New Jeraey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Dragon
pennaylvania
Shod. lalaad
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tannaaiaa
7axaa
Utah
Vanaont
Virginia
Haahington
Heat Virginia
Wisconain
Wyoming
national
EPA Ration
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
EC
X
CPA
Ration
IV
X
DC
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
ni
VIII
ni
IX
i
ii
VI
ii
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
in
X
III
V
VIII
U10
2
0
2
4
10
1
2
0
3
4
0
1
9
1
1
2
2
a
0
4
11
2
3
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
i
8
0
2
1
18
1
0
0
0
3
9
1
1
3
7
0
11
_°
142
8
6
4
25
38
16
4
3
30
8
11-20
4
0
0
1
a
0
0
0
0
i
0
0
4
2
0
0
3
0
2
0
2
2
1
3
2
0
1
0
2
3
0
2
7
0
I
0
22
5
0
0
0
3
1
a
4
2
11
0
5
_o
104
10
5
7
21
15
2
3
0
8
33
21-50
0
0
0
0
10
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
7
5
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
3
0
5
5
0
0
0
16
7
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
1
8
0
1
_0.
94
10
8
10
10
ie
i
3
2
10
24
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
-0
i*.
3
2
2
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
Non-
Avallabla
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3
a
i
0
i
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
1
_°
33
1
I
1
3
12
4
1
0
4
6
SIC 3553
Total
6
0
2
5
32
2
3
0
4
6
0
1
26
11
1
2
5
3
4
2
15
22
5
7
7
2
1
0
3
9
0
13
21
0
9
2
59
16
1
0
0
10
13
1
6
6
29
0
20
_o
392
32
22
24
52
93
30
11
5
34
89
SIC 3534 Papar Indmtrlaa Haehlnarr
Afta Range (Yaari
1-10
1
0
1
0
6
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
7
2
0
0
0
0
4
2
17
2
3
1
4
0
0
0
3
5
0
17
1
0
6
0
3
4
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
I
1
0
7
_a
106
26
22
7
7
27
2
4
0
7
4
11-20
4
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
10
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
6
0
15
0
0
10
0
5
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
8
-0
84
15
21
8
7
23
2
2
0
1
5
21-50
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
6
0
16
0
0
3
1
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
13
J>
74
13
22
7
2
22
1
I
0
3
3
i)
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
_o
19_
9
1
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
1
Ron-
Avallabla
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
11
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
.5
0
7
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
2
-0
46
14
12
3
3
11
1
0
0
1
1
SIC 3554
Total
5
0
1
1
11
0
3
0
2
7
0
0
17
0
1
0
2
7
5
56
5
3
1
6
0
0
0
7
22
0
56
2
0
25
1
10
17
3
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
4
1
35
_2.
329
77
78
25
19
91
6
7
0
12
14
E-2
-------
SIC 3555 Printing Trade sjtechinery
States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
EPA
Region
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Age Range fYears)
1-10
1
0
1
0
23
1
9
0
5
7
0
0
39
5
1
0
3
5
0
7
25
8
3
0
7
0
1
0
1
23
1
55
3
0
16
1
4
17
2
0
0
1
7
0
0
6
4
0
7
_0
299
37
78
30
20
78
14
9
1
24
8
11-20
3
0
0
1
16
1
0
0
6
1
0
0
35
2
1
1
1
0
0
2
12
6
3
1
13
0
1
0
0
20
0
41
2
0
14
0
2
15
1
2
0
1
3
1
0
2
6
0
3
_°
219
13
61
19
17
63
4
16
2
16
8
21-50
1
0
1
0
18
3
4
0
0
1
0
0
30
1
0
2
3
1
0
4
11
10
3
0
7
0
0
0
0
16
0
44
1
0
18
0
1
13
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
9
_£
206
16
60
19
6
71
2
9
3
19
2
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_0
27
4
6
4
2
10
0
0
0
1
0
Non-
Available.
0
0
0
0
15
0
1
0
3
3
0
0
15
0
4
0
0
1
0
3
8
6
1
0
2
0
0
0
5
25
0
13
2
0
14
1
1
9
1
0
1
3
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
141
15
38
13
11
37
4
7
0
15
1
SIC 3555
Total
5
0
2
1
73
5
15
0
14
12
0
0
125
a
6
3
9
7
0
17
59
33
11
1
29
0
2
0
6
88
1
155
a
0
62
2
8
57
5
2
1
5
13
1
0
10
11
0
20
_°
892
85
243
84
56
259
24
41
6
75
19
SIC 3559 Special Indmtry Machinery, H.E.C.
Age Range (Years)
1-LO
9
0
6
2
80
4
18
0
20
6
0
1
54
20
6
6
6
4
0
9
47
53
19
0
7
0
0
0
4
45
0
42
8
3
94
4
14
35
10
6
1
10
23
2
1
6
a
4
17
0
714
30
87
54
65
257
33
20
9
36
23
11-20
3
0
4
1
40
3
12
0
4
4
1
0
38
5
a
0
2
1
2
3
29
31
a
i
a
0
i
l
4
47
0
41
5
0
48
5
3
27
5
1
0
0
12
1
1
1
6
3
6
_o
426
53
88
34
20
136
19
17
4
46
9
21-50
2
0
1
2
41
1
17
2
5
1
0
0
44
12
2
1
5
0
1
5
32
45
9
0
4
0
1
0
2
47
0
55
5
2
65
2
1
35
5
1
1
5
7
1
0
6
1
1
14
0
489
57
102
49
24
189
11
9
4
42
2
51 and My
1
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
1
2
0
0
7
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
7
0
0
7
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
4
_0
56.
13
9
2
6
23
1
0
1
1
0
Non-
Available
1
0
2
0
27
2
9
0
2
1
0
0
15
3
1
3
3
1
3
2
25
24
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
18
0
12
1
0
50
2
1
20
2
0
0
0
9
0
0
2
1
2
10
_0
257
39
30
26
9
103
12
5
2
29
2
SIC 3559
Total
16
0
13
5
189
11
59
2
32
14
1
1
158
43
17
10
17
7
6
19
139
155
37
2
20
0
2
1
U
159
0
157
19
5
264
13
19
119
22
3
2
16
51
4
5
15
16
10
51
0
1,942
242
316
165
124
708
76
51
20
204
36
Mote- Totals shown are different than those in Table , page 36, because of Che different data source. Totals are also different
than shown In Table , page 42, because Appendix E totals include non-reporting companies and Table totals do not.
*Source- Dun & Bradstreet Listing of 6,900 Manufacturing Establishments, April 1975.
E-3
-------
Appendix F
Age Distribution of Manufacturing Establishments'
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Loui slana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
Sew York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Heat Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Rational
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
SIC 3572 Typewriters
EPA
Region
IV
X
DC
VI
DC
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
DC
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
DC
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
AM Range (Years^
1-10
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
11-20
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
0
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
21-50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Non-
AvalUble
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
9
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
_o.
25
1
11
4
3
5
0
1
0
0
0
SIC 3572
Total
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
15
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
_0
45
1
19
6
3
6
2
2
0
6
0
SIC 3573 Electronic Computing Equipment
Axe Ranie (Yei
1-10
1
0
14
1
131
14
13
0
12
8
0
0
16
1
1
3
0
1
0
8
61
12
15
0
2
1
1
0
4
35
2
40
4
0
12
3
2
21
2
0
0
2
20
7
0
4
14
0
5
0
494
81
75
33
27
61
27
7
22
145
16
11-20
0
0
2
0
21
0
1
0
4
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
13
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
11
0
0
3
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
77
15
14
3
4
a
6
3
0
23
1
21-50
0
0
0
0
10
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
34
6
8
2
0
6
1
0
0
10
1
irs)
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
Non-
Available
I
0
4
0
64
5
3
0
7
11
0
0
10
0
0
2
1
0
0
5
22
12
27
0
0
0
1
0
0
12
0
16
5
1
9
1
2
18
1
1
2
1
10
1
2
4
1
0
0
263
28
28
27
27
59
11
5
7
68
3
SIC 3573
Total
2
0
20
1
226
19
19
0
23
19
0
1
31
4
1
6
1
1
0
14
101
28
46
0
4
1
2
0
4
52
2
77
9
1
24
6
4
42
4
1
2
3
35
8
1
9
16
0
5
877
130
129
65
58
138
45
15
30
246
21
F-l
-------
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
IllinoU
Indiana
Iowa
Kansaa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Malna
Maryland
Maeaechuaatts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Sabraika
Nevada
Ne* Hampshire
Hew Jersey
New Mexico
Sew York
Sorth Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennaylvanla
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texae
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Welt Virginia
Wliconeln
Wyoming
national
EPA Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
EPA
Ration
IV
X
TX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
Vll
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Age Range (Yean)
U10
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
11-20 21-50 51 and Up
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_o
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
Son-
Available.
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SIC 3574
Total
2
0
0
1
12
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
16
1
0
0
1
1
0
3
5
a
i
0
2
I
1
0
0
3
1
7
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
-0
10
3
4
0
3
7
1
2
2
4
0
2 1
4 1
0 0
0 0
4 6
0 0
0 1
0 0
4 1
0 0
2
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
10
4
7
32
4
3
3
12
0
1-10
1
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
6
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
5
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
I
2
0
0
0
3
0
1
_0
38
3
6
1
4
11
3
2
0
5
3
11-20
1
0
0
1
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
s
0
3
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
_a
39
4
8
1
3
6
6
1
0
8
2
n.sa
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_0
23
1
5
4
1
7
0
2
1
2
0
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
Non-
Avallabla
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
I
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
1
0
a
0
2
2
0
0
0
I
_0
31
2
1
1
5
13
0
1
2
6
0
Cory
SIC 3576
Total
2
0
0
1
19
2
4
0
2
2
0
0
21
1
4
1
3
0
0
2
2
4
1
1
2
0
0
2
1
10
0
10
1
0
10
4
2
6
0
1
0
1
4
2
3
0
3
0
2
0
136
10
20
8
13
39
9
7
4
21
5
F-2
-------
SIC 3579 Office Machines, S.E.C.
States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
rv
VII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
1-10
1
0
1
1
19
0
2
0
5
3
0
0
10
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
5
2
3
0
1
0
1
0
1
9
0
11
3
0
4
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
3
0
1
0
Age Range
11-20
0
0
2
1
4
1
0
1
3
0
0
0
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
11
1
0
1
3
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
(Years)
21-50
0
0
0
0
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
12
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
8
3
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
0
11
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
51 and Up
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Non-
Available
1
0
0
0
9
2
1
0
0
3
0
0
9
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
2
11
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
2
0
SIC 3570
Total
2
0
3
2
40
3
5
1
9
7
0
0
43
2
1
0
3
2
1
2
26
6
6
0
4
0
1
0
2
22
2
48
5
0
8
4
2
12
1
4
0
0
5
0
0
8
3
0
3
0
99
8
20
6
14
21
4
2
0
20
4
52
7
12
6
4
11
4
1
1
63
9
17
5
2
18
0
3
0
8
1
17
67
16
4
9
12
7
0
2
9
0
298
35
70
23
30
68
15
6
3
43
5
N°": rh«^hn™ ?of™fnlr Cha" th°?? *£ T*ble , ' p!fe 36' be?ause °f the different data source. Totals are also different
than shown in Table , page 42, because Appendix F totals include non-reporting companies and Table totals do not.
*Source: Dun & Bradstreet Listing of 6,900 Manufacturing Establishments, April 1975.
F-3
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT METHODOLOGY
STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INDUSTRY
The first major phase of this study was characterizing the SIC
355 and 357 industries statistically in terms of number of plants and
geographic distribution, age and process distribution, distribution
by product, and other factors. The methodology utilized for this
task is integral to the presentation of the description of the
industry in Section II and since it is enunciated there, it is not
repreated here. The principal source documents used were the 1967
and 1972 Census £f Manufactures. The data provided therein were
supplemented by the Dun & Bradstreet Inc. Metalworking Directory for
1974
IDENTIFYING CANDIDATE PLANTS FOR SURVEY
The methodology for the random selection of plants within SIC 355
and 357 as candidates for on-site survey was as follows:
A representative mix of plants in terms of size, geographic
location, and products produced was compiled from a computer printout
of the sections of the Dun &_ Bradstreet Inc. Metalworking Directory
for 1974 on these two industrial classifications. Among the
pertinent factors provided on each plant by this material were:
Name and address of plant
Primary and secondary SIC's
Number of employees
Identification of management personnel
Telephone number
Sales volume
Age of business
Products
Size distribution was based on plants with less than 20 employees
and plants with more than 20 employees. Lists were prepared for all
four-digit SIC classifications within SIC 355 and 357 which provided
product distribution. Geographic location was distributed among the
Northeast, Southern, North Central, and Western sections of the
country. This terminology, which derived from usage in the Dun &
Bradstreed Directory, covered all states and areas of the country.
G-l
-------
TEADE ASSOCIATION CONTACTS
Simultaneous with preparation of the above plant lists, trade
associations representing plants in SIC 355 and 357 were identified.
Sources for this information were contractor knowledge, industrial
journals, and the 1974 volume National^^Trade and Professional
Associations of the United States a.nd Labor Unions (Columbia Books,
Inc., Washington, B.C.).
Association representatives were first contacted by telephone for
two purposes: (1) To acquaint them with the objectives of the
on-going study, and (2) to solicit any assistance they might provide
to the project. Next, visits were made to Washington, D.C. offices
of association representatives to gain first-hand insight into the
industries involved, to discuss project requirements in more detail,
and to convey EPA requests for their participation in review of the
draft final report. Industry directories were obtained both as a
result of early telephone calls and personal visits.
PLANT SURVEYS
The next step was arranging on-site surveys. The random
selection lists were provided to each survey team which consisted of
one individual knowledgeable in the processes of the metal working
industries and another conversant with wastes produced and techniques
for their disposal. Within the framework of built-in safeguards
against overlap, each team undertook to arrange its own surveys.
This proved to be a difficult and timeconsuming effort involving
several problems. First of all, telephone contacts with the plants
selected at random from the Dun & Bradstreet lists indicated from the
outset very severe deficiencies in the Dun & Bradstreet data for
purposes of this project. Many calls were made to plants which do
not make any of the products which would place them in either SIC 355
and 357 — there were a number of establishments engaged only in
printing, for example. Since this fact became apparent in many cases
only after a period of time had been used in introducing and
explaining the scope of the project, considerable time was lost. In
other cases, the plant selected no longer existed or had relocated
leaving no change of address.
The second major problem encountered in scheduling plant visits
was the fact that many plant officials refused to participate in a
surveyo Many reasons were given, most of which fell within two broad
categories:
1. A large number of government-sponsored surveys had already
consumed too much time which was considered unproductive by the plant
G-2
-------
personnel; and
2. The plant was too small to afford the personnel time to
prepare for a survey.
This development resulted in the fact that random selection was
skewed quite early to larger plants0 Although some of those visited
were quite small in comparison to the largest ones in these
industries, they do not adequately represent the smallest plants.
Many plant contacts also advised that theirs was a machine shop
operation only and produced very little waste of any kind. It was
pointed out that since a purpose of the study was to determine the
kinds and amounts of waste disposal areas needed by these industries
establishing this fact was of equal value to documenting waste
quantities.
The first 19 visits proved their contention to be valid to a
large extent in that virtually none of the chemical/heat-using
processes with the greatest waste producing potential were found. At
that point, a new criterion was established for plant selection —
i.e., that they engage in casting, forging, heat treating,
electroplating, or other processes more complex than machining and
assembly. The difficulties encountered in identifying such plants
are described in Section III. In addition to the phone contacts
discussed there, an attempt was made to canvass nearly all SIC 355
and 357 establishments in the Los Angeles area, an effort which
reached a great many of them. Except for one plant selected in the
random process in which scheduling difficulties precluded a survey,
none was found in the Los Angeles area which engage in the above
processes.
At this juncture, plants were selected which were known to
include one or more of the above processes. This move was necessary
in order to gather data on the wastes generated by them, but at the
same time it skewed waste quantities toward the waste-producing
processes.
A standard interview format was used in each plant survey in
order to maximize uniformity of data gathered and its presentation.
The form is shown at the end of this Appendix. A total of 20 visits
were made which resulted from the random selection process, and 13
hand-picked plants were surveyed. In addition, visits were made to
the corporation headquarters of two major manufacturers with plants
in SIC 355 and 357 to discuss overall company policies and procedures
with respect to the treatment and disposal of potentially hazardous
wastes.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF WASTES
G-3
-------
A total of 23 process waste samples from manufacturing plants
were collected and analyzed for use in ascertaining the hazardous
nature of the various process wastes. As noted in the body of the
report, selection of samples was guided by the following criteria:
1, The wastes should be destined for land disposal or
incineration.
2. They should be generated in relatively significant quantities
by the plant. This was usually defined as more than 190 liters (50
gallons) per year.
3. The wastes should be available for sampling by the survey
team.
The methodology of the chemical analyses performed was as follows:
Flash Point
A setaflash Tester (closed cup, range 50-225°F) model OISF was
used in all flash point measurements. This instrument has been
accepted by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM
Method D-3278-73) as well as the U.S. Department of Transportation.
All values reported were to the nearest degree Fahrenheit except
where no flash was observed (upper limit of detection is 225°F).
Cyanide
Cyanide determinations were made by first distilling an acidified
sample into caustic, forming sodium cyanide. The sodium cyanide was
converted to cyanogen chloride (CNC1) by reaction with chLoramine-T<>
Pyridine-pyrazolone reagent was then added to react with the cyanogen
chloride and form a blue dye which was measured
spectrophotometrically at 620 nanometers (nm). (The cyanide present
was determined by comparison of this absorbance at 620 nm with
standards at known concentrations, treated in the same manner.)
Results were reported as mg CN/liter (lower detection limit - 10
mg/1). Reference, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
W astewater, 13th Ed., p. 397, Method 207, APHA, AWWA, WPCF, 1971.
Oil and Grease (Hexane Extractables)
The oil and grease content of the sludge samples was determined
by first drying a portion (20g) of the sample with magnesium sulfate
(monohydrate), followed by grinding into a dry powder. The resulting
powder was then extracted in a soxhlet apparatus using 150 ml of
G-4
-------
hexane as the extracting solvent (four hours at 20 cycles/hour). The
solvent, containing the extracted oil and grease, was then evaporated
at 45°C in a beaker. After dessicating, the beaker was weighed and
the oil and grease (hexane extractable) content calculated and
reported as mg/kg.
The oil and grease content of the liquid samples were determined
by first acidifying a portion of the sample with HC1 to a pH of 1.
The solid and/or viscous grease was then separated from the liquid by
filtration (Whatman #40 filter paper containing one gram of filter
aid). The filter paper, containing the oil and grease, was then
extracted as described above for the sludge samples in a soxhlet
apparatus using 150 ml of hexane. The oil and grease content was
reported as mg/kg as hexane extractable (lower detection limit - 25
mg/1). Reference: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 13th Ed., Method 209C, p. 412, Method 209A, p. 409, APHA,
AWWA, WPCF, 1971.
Metals (Cd. Cr. Cu. Fe. Pb. and Zn)
Samples for metal analyses were prepared for atomic absorption
spectroscopy by two procedures. First, for the water leaching tests,
the samples were weighed into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks and twice the
samples' weight of distilled water was added. The flasks were sealed
and placed on a Burrell Model 75 wrist action shaker and agitated for
8 hours. The samples were then centrifuged and filtered through 0.45
micron filters to remove particulate matter. The pH and specific
conductance of the filtrates were measured. The filtrates were
acidified with HN03 and evaporated to dryness on a hot plate. The
residues were dissolved with H.C1 and diluted to a known volume with
distilled water. The metals were then determined by atomic
absorption spectroscopy as described in Manual of Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S. EPA, 1974.
Second, to obtain the total concentration of metals in the
samples themselves, the ignited solids obtained from the percent
solids at 550°C were treated with HNC>3 and evaporated to dryness.
The residues were leached with HC1 and diluted to known volumes with
distilled water. The metals were determined as above.
The ranges of detection limits in ppm were as follows:
Cd 0.02 - 0.2
Cr 0.02 - 0.2
Cu 0.06 - 0.2
Fe 0008 - 1.0
Pb 0.5 - 10.0
Zn 0.02 0.2
Ni 0.1
Mn 0.04
G-5
-------
Fluoride
The fluoride content was determined by leaching 25 grams of
sample with 50 ml of distilled water. After filtering, the filtrate
was analyzed for fluoride by adding SPADN5 reagent and comparing the
spectrophotometrically measured absorbance with standards,, The
results were reported as leachable fluoride on an mg/kg of sample
basis (lower limit of detection - 0.1 mg/kg). Reference: Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th Ed., Method
121C p. 174, APHA, AWA, WPCF, 1971.
Specific Conductance
The specific conductance of the leachates, obtained from
leaching the solids sample as described under the metal analysis
.description, was determined using a YSI Model 31 Conductivity Bridge.
All values were corrected to 25°C and reported in micromhos.
The pH of the liquid sample, as well as the leachates obtained
from leaching the solid samples (see metal analysis methodology) was
determined using an Analytical Measurements digital pH meter and a
combination electrode. All measurements were made at ambient
temperature and reported to the nearest 0.1 pH units« The meter was
standardized against standard buffer solutions at pH 4, 7, and 10.
Drying Loss of Solids at 103°C
Samples were weighed into tared dishes previously ignited at
550°C. The dishes were placed in a drying oven at 103°C and dried to
a constant weight (lower limit of detection 0.01%).
Ignition Loss of Solids at 550°C
The weighed dishes from the drying loss at 103°C were placed in
a muffle furnace at 550°C and ignited to a constant weight. The
weight loss from 103°C to 550°C was calculated as ignition loss at
550°C (lower limit of detection - 0.01%),
Solids at 550°C
The residue remaining after ignition at 550°C was calculated as
G-6
-------
solids at 550°C (lower limit of detection - 0.01%). 1970 Annual Book
o_f_ ASTM Standards, Part Q
Water
Water concentration was determined on the aqueous-organic
mixtures using the Karl Fischer Titration with visual end point. The
Karl Fischer Titration for water is represented by the simplified
equation:
(I2 + S02 + CH OH + 3 Pyridine) _ H20 -»
(Karl Fischer Reagent) .
(2 Pyridine H l" + Pyridine HOS0
(End Product with H00)
Samples were weighed into methanol, which had been titrated
free of water, and standard Karl Fischer Reagent was added to a
visual end point. Colored iodine is consumed in the reaction with
water allowing end point detection (lower limit of detection - 0.2%).
Chemical Analysis, H. A. Laitenen, 1960, p. 421 FF.
Trichloroethylene
The trichloroethylene (M.W. 131.4, B.P. 87°C) content of those
samples suspected of containing a significant amount was determined
according to the following procedure:
1. A mixture containing 33% toluene, 33% methanol, and 33%
sample was prepared and distilled. The distillate boiling over at up
to 105°C was collected and analyzed by gas chromatography.
2. One microliter of distillate was injected into a Varian
series 2800 gas chromatograph, isothermally operated at 70°C, using a
flame ionization detector and a 1/4" x 6' stainless steel column
packed with 15% Carbowax - TPA on 80/100 Chromosorb W. The
chromatograph was operated in conjunction with a strip chart recorder
and an Autolab integrator.
3. Calculation of the percent of trichloroethylene in the
unknown samples were made by comparison with standard
trichloroethylene solutions and the internal methanol standard
present in each of the samples distilled.
Results were reported as % trichloroethylene (lower limit of
detection - 0.1%). References: Standard Methods for the Examination
o f Water and Wastewater, 13th Ed., Method 113A p. 100, APHA, AWWA,
WPCF, 1971 and H. McNair, E. Bonelli, Basic Gas Chromatography,
Consolidated Publishers, California, p. Ill, 1967.
G-7
-------
APPLICATION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The analytical data plus the results of a literature search
were compared to criteria, which were developed by the contractor, to
determine which process waste streams were potentially hazardous.
ESTIMATING . WASTE QUANTITIES
Estimates of national and state totals of potentially hazardous
wastes deriving from SIC 355 and 357 plants were determined on the
basis of plant survey and Census of Manufactures data. Two basic
factors were taken into account: (1) Waste characteristics are
dependent upon the processes used within individual plantsj and (2)
the quantities of wastes generated by each process will vary
according to the size of the process. The major indicators of
process size in a plant are dimensions of process area, number of
production workers assigned to each process, the amount of material
input into the process, and the amount of material output from the
process. Figures on the amount of material entering and leaving each
process are generally not available. This is because plants usually
do not keep records of this information, and, if they do, it is
proprietary. The process area square footage is available from the
plant survey data, but there is no related information on national or
state totals.
Thus, the one indicator upon which both survey and Census data
could be correlated was the number of production workers employed in
each process. The number reported by surveyed plants and waste
quantities reported were used to develop waste generation factors
which were then applied to national production employee totals.
Estimates for state totals were determined using Census data on
production worker distribution by states.
The potentially hazardous wastes and the potentially hazardous
waste constituents to be quantified were determined by the laboratory
analyses of samples collected on site visits and in accord with, the
definition of hazardous wastes used in this report.
National and state waste totals were developed using the
following expressions:
National waste quantity = No. of processes used in
the industry X average amount of employees per
process X average amount of waste per year for
each employee.
G-8
-------
State waste quantity = National waste quantity X
percent of production workers in each state in SIC
355 and 357.
Waste quantities were projected to 1977 and 1983 using Census
and U.S. Industrial Outlook statistics to estimate the number of
production workers in the industries through 1983. The rise or fall
in the number of production workers was distributed among the various
unit processes in existing ratios. It was also assumed that process
technology will not change drastically between now and 1983. The
same waste generation factors in terms of kkg/yr-dept. employee
developed for 1975 were applied through 1983, and additional wastes
for land disposal created by achievement of "zero pollution
discharge" pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act were
taken into account. Based primarily on engineering judgment, it is
estimated that the data developed are accurate to jf 30 percent.
The effects of the effluent limitations guidelines to be applied
under the Act on 1983 waste quantities for land disposal were
calculated as follows:
Basic data on the quantity and quality of the raw waste loads
generated by the 11 basic metal working processes covered by this
report were provided by EPA's Development Document for Effluent
Limitations Guidelines and Standards of Performance for the Machinery
and Mechanical Products Point Source Category. Breakdowns by
four-digit SIC classifications in terms of the processes utilized and
total volume of wastewater discharged annually were set forth
although wastewater data were not developed for specific SIC
industries. Instead, mean flow quantities and contaminant
concentrations for representative raw waste streams were determined.
These data were used in conjunction with other available data to
quantify the wastes attributable to the 11 four-digit industries
within SIC 355 and 357. In order to allocate the total water volume
discharged by each industry to each of the processes utilized, a
factor representing the ratio of the flow used per process to the sum
of the flows for all the applicable processes was employed. The
jnethodology used can be explained by using SIC 3551, Food Products
Machinery, as an example.
The above Development Document showed that heat treating,
electroplating, forming, machining, coating, and assembly are
practiced in 40 to 60 percent of SIC 3551 establishments. The flow
data indicated that these processes discharge a mean wastewater
volume, MGD, of approximately 0.51, 0.50, 0.41, 0.30, 0.51, and 0.46
respectively. Using these process wastewater flows, each process was
allocated the amount of contaminants to be removed based on known
waste concentrations which were contained in the Development
Document.
G-9
-------
The hazardous wastes quantified are cyanides, cadmium, total
chromium, lead, mercury, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and oil and
grease. Total suspended solids (TSS) were the only nonhazardous
waste constituent considered, since most of the solids attributable
to BOD are already included in the oil and grease and TSS
constituents which make up more than 99 percent of the total quantity
of contaminants.
In order to calculate the quantity per year of hazardous,
nonhazardous, and total wastes destined for landfill or incineration,
the concentrations of hazardous wastes in mg/1 were added. Then, the
volume of water utilized by process was converted from gallons to
pounds, and the total hazardous and nonhazardous wastes
concentrations were determined. The pounds per year, dry weight, or
wastes generated were totaled and converted to tons per year.
The summary information was developed in this manner for the
processes noted above.
ESTABLISHING LEVEL I, II, AND III TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGIES
The treatment and disposal practices of these industries were
extrapolated from the data on waste disposal practices of surveyed
plants. Level I technology, the most prevalent in use for a given
waste, was established by tabulating the information provided on
current practices. This tabulation indicated Level I very clearly in
all cases. Level II, the best technology in use, was almost as
clear-cut although some allowance had to be made for the fact that
limited plants may achieve a Level II technology which is not
possible in others — complete recirculation of coolants, for
example.
Level III technology — technology necessary to provide adequate
health and environmental protection which may include pilot or bench
scale processes — was influenced by the fact that the degree of
toxicity of some of the waste materials, and their ultimate
environmental effects, have not been clearly established. This led
to the specification of secured landfills for the disposal of
potentially hazardous wastes rather than sanitary landfills.
ESTIMATING COSTS
Cost data on the treatment and disposal of process, wastes from
the special machinery and office machine manufacturing industries
were derived from information supplied during the 33 survey visits,
from the special cost variability study, and from the Snell report on
hazardous waste treatment and disposal costs. However, less than
G-10
-------
half the plants provided usable data, necessitating the use of cost
information supplied in other EPA reports and various literature
sources.
Most of the manufacturing establishments in the industry use
private contractors for the handling, treatment, and disposal of
potentially hazardous wastes. Because of this, the cost estimates
for each waste stream reflect off-site hazardous waste management,
and do not include breakdowns of the costs borne by the manufacturing
establishments. Level III technology is not practiced to a
'significant degree for any of the process waste streams generated by
the industry. Because of this, data and information from other
literature sources were used to project costs for Level III treatment
and disposal to the special machinery and office machines
manufacturing industries.
Typical manufacturing establishments within SIC 355 and 357 were
defined in Section III based on plant survey results and data
supplied by the Census of Manufactures. Using this information plus
the cost data derived for each waste stream, the average annual cost
of potentially hazardous waste treatment and disposal using Level I,
II, and III technology for typical plants were calculated. Average
treatment and disposal costs to the industries as a whole were
calculated based on Table II-7 which shows the number of each unit
process in the subject industries. Data on the average number of
employees per unit process and the average potentially hazardous
waste generated per process were used to crudely estimate national
costs for each level of technology. No allowance was made for
on-site treatment and disposal practices within the industry due to
the relatively low percentage of use of such practices.
Based on the variability of hazardous waste management costs, it
is anticipated, based on contractor judgment that the data provided
are accurate to 4^ 30 percent.
G-ll
-------
WAPORA, Inc.
A. T. Kearney, Inc.
Contract No. 68-01-3193
ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE PRACTICES
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Company Name
Plant Address
Telephone /
Persons Contacted
EPA Representative Present
Plant Age
Plant Survey Report
Date Visited
Zip Code
Survey Team
Number of Employees
Last Major Expansion or Modification
PRODUCTION AT THIS LOCATION
Product Made
SIC Code
Production Rate
Number Made/Yr. Sales/Yr.
G-12
-------
Page 2
COMPANY NAME
LOCATION
II. PROCESS WASTE GENERATION
Manufacturing Process
(1)
Typical Products
Types of Processes and Equipment Used
Perrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Die Casting
Forging
Electroplating
Galvanizing
Heat Treating
Machine Shop
Tool and Die Shop
Plate or Struct. Fabric.
Stamping, Blanking,
Forming
Painting and Other
Coating
Plastics Molding
Assembly
Shipping Department
Other Operations
G-13
Note: (1) Attach process flow diagram for SIC 355 and 357 products manufactured.
-------
Page 3
II. PROCESS WASTE GENERATION - Cont'd.
Manufacturing Process(1)
Department
Area
No. Employees
Description of Process
Waste Streams (2)
Ferrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Die Casting
Forging
Electroplating
Galvanizing
Heat Treating
Machine Shop
Tool and Die Shop
Plate or Struct. Fabric,
Stamping, Blanking,
Forming
Painting and Other
Coating
Plastics Molding
Assembly
Shipping Department
Other Operations
Note: (1) Attach process flow diagram for SIC 355 and 357 products manufactured,
(2) Cite potentially hazardous constituents and their usage rates.
G-14
-------
Page A
II. PROCESS WASTE GENERATION - Cont'd.
Manufacturing Process
(1)
Waste Flow Rates
Stream Sampled
Comments
Ferrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Foundry
Non Ferrous Die Casting
Forging
Electroplating
Galvanizing
Heat Treating
Machine Shop
Tool and Die Shop
Plate or Struct. Fabric.
Stamping, Blanking,
Forming
Painting and Other
Coating
Plastics Molding
Assembly
Shipping Department
Other Operations
Note: (1) Attach process flow diagram for SIC 355 and 357 products manufactured,
G-15
-------
Page 5
COMPANY NAME LOCATION
III. PROCESS WASTE DISPOSAL METHODS
A. Are potentially hazardous wastes handled or treated differently from other
wastes? If yes, explain
B. Are potentially hazardous solid and semi-solid wastes disposed of on-site
or off-site? Disposal methods used
C. Disposal method(s) used for water and wastewater treatment sludges
D. Total quantity of process wastewater generated (excluding cooling water)
E. Disposal method(s) used for. materials collected by air pollution abatement
devices
F. Disposal methods used for other process waste streams (other than contrac-
tor disposal
G. Cost of on-site disposal
H. Does a private contractor dispose of any process wastes?
Contractor Name
Address Phone No.
type of Disposal Facility
Approximate Cost of Disposal Service
Types and Quantities of Wastes Handled from Plant
Method(s) used to store and collect wastes for disposal (containers used,
precautions 3 taken both at plant and contractor's site)
G-16
-------
Page '6
COMPANY NAME LOCATION
IV. FUTURE OPERATION CHANGES
A. Are there any firm plans for changing the use of potentially hazardous
materials in your plant?
B. Are there any firm plans for changes in process waste disposal methods?
G_
17
-------
O 4-i eu <
X -H 3
en g rHen
CU -rl CO E
lH .J > <,
X OC
H ?
o
0
0
O
CO
J
X
w
H
Q
U
H
CJ
to
C 4-1 M
O -H B
CO O *H
CO tH 4-1
eu X to
rH O IX
O H
X 4-1
en B
co -H cj
rHOO
O -H OC
X rH O
O 1-4. O
ej X rH
rH 3 ^
< iH 00
O
en
•rt M
14 rH C?
CU -H O
*-* X rH
c8 3 ^-
3 rH 00
O
CO
00
B 4J
•H C C_
4-1 vH o
rH O
00
B 4H
•S B 0
rH *H O
•H O
o eu
O3
CO
££
o
z
CO
rH
I
X X
00 3
rH O
CO CO
X
>> 3
-I rH
cu o
X
3
rH
O
CO
B
M •> CO £ rH
•§
CT\
rH
I
O
§
PH
Cu
en eo
I3
co
o
00
o
o
CO
o
CO
B
eu
r3
O
CO
o
rH
o
O
I
U
cu
a
Cu
3
cr
13
3
en
en
eu en
rH O CU
CO 3
cu cr
o
o
rH
CJ
o s "O
r-i O CU
O X eu
cj a: z
3
er
3
er
rJ
•o
3
3
cr
X
o
cj
en en
X X
CJ cj
X
cj
o
cj
3
er
a>
X
0>
0)
c
01
4-1
01
fH
£
JH
r2
|
O
i-J
o
rH
g
U
H
1
r-t
ft
rH
rH
rH
m
ro
rH
S
M
O
O
M
O
rH
°
0)
c
CO
x:
4_)
0)
1
O
l-l
o
rH
U
•H
M
t
ca
t
o
o
rH
»c
U
H
I
r.
•H
•H
c-n
c-o
rH
01
c
CO
4J
0)
cu
z
«3
4_l
01
-H
CJ
CJ
rH
0
1-1
«
CJ
rH
O
c
0)
ftl
rH
rH
^
^
cu
I-H rH CU B
>. >, C O
X X O 4J
4J 4J 4-t CU
O
•£>
O
H
B
O
B
co
4-1
3
ca
i
X
a
x
a.
£
i
o
-i aj
o c
rH CU
X -H
a X
-i X
eu t-J
Oi eu
t3
to C
13 CU
"BrH
4J O
cn en
H-l
-------
•a
u
C
0
u
1
X
X
•rt
•s
a.
a
T3
rH
O 4J
rC ft
-,
ot
e
4J 01
O -rt
•rt 4J
X CO
o a.
H
4-1
C
•rt U
O o
a.
X
u
•rt CK
rH O
•rt O
A rH
3 ~^
rH CK
0
en
4J
•rt CK
58
X) rH
3 ^>
rH M
o
CO
C O
•rt o
o
a*
•rt o
O
CJ
•rt >
•H *rt
U >
a co
a rl
w O
rH
to
•rt
4J CU
W CO
C
IH
CU
CJ
c
rt
i
a.
rH
3
S
rJ
O
cu
(TJ
s
o
CJ
Cl)
s
cd
2
rH
to
y
u
r-l
(B M
rH .C
3 OC
y -H
cu cu
rH 3
O
2
"~^
O
^
cu
3
rH
O
CO
CN
rH
CO
CU
ca
o
i-
o
y
cu
Q
O
CN
a
rH *rt
m w
4J CO
CU """^
1
•rt W
rH C
flj (y
(Si f ,
a s
TJ CU
CU 3
of cr
m
o
CJ
T3
•H
y
u
g
o
CJ
1
•H
U
H
S
3
•rt
§0)
•a
IH *rt
JS X
o o
rH
O
8
rH
0)
C
a oo o
crj C S-$ 6^ CN
4J -rt -3" \O 33
M rH CN I1"- •+•
C -rt • - rH
CJ S CN £ B
3
y
y
•rt
CO
•rt
J4
3
y
•rt
o
rC
U
o
rl T)
•O -rt
£3
5
m
in
CO
cu x
en rH
O *J
a. s
B o>
0
eN
1
en
00
o
rH
00
•rt
rH
•g
O.
eo
CO
rH T3
O 3
rH CT
53
o
g
TJ
-rt
U
y
•rt
JJ
O
<
"O
•rt
«tj
y
•rt
•rt
CN
O
CO
CN
CU
rH
3
O
CO
O
CN
rH
00
•rt
CJ
•rt
03
CO
CU
rH T3
0 13
rH cr
O -rt
CJ rJ
4J +
C 00
03 C 5-« fr
4-1 -H in u
co rH n w
C -rt •
o a c*i ^
c -u
cu "a
00 -rt
O V-
u Q
T3 3
X rH
K fa
y
•rt
M
O
3
rH
UH
O
TJ -rt
x y
rC <
rH
O
0
CN
rH
rH
rH
m
rH
CO
EU
CO
O
CX
o
y
0)
O
•cr
rH
01
til
< o
m
CO
cu y
rH -rt
O S
rH O
3S
•« O r*
1 CN O
D. 5 °°
D 33 U
•a
•rt
0 3
-H 0-
33
CN
O
-3-
-E
CJ
•H
y
tH
CD
•rt
>
•rt
y
u
•rt
u
cu
m
o
o
o
rH
ON
rH
rH
O
r-*
rH
1
CO
rH
I-*
H
CO
•rt >,
sO
O
rf
°
tj
•rt
y
•rt
M
cd
cd
H
O
O
m
rH
CN
CU
rH
X 3
rl rrt
cu o
> CO
ON
O
n
CN
CN
C*1
rH
O
CN
CU
O CO
r* 01
«S CJ
O
u "i
•rt 0
0
X
s
3
•rt 01
en 4j
CO CO
4J "O
O >\
Oi 33
§CU
•o
•rt iH
CO X
CO 0
eg u
4J -rj
o >^
cu x
T-H
rH
S
CM
eu
rH
!>s 3
rl rH
CO
rrt
"
O
• "
O 00 4J
•rt cy MH
rH rrt «
r-t CJ 3
•rt -rt y
^— ' J-i IH
m m H CJ CJ
^fr
O
CO
z
u
rH
cci
CO
rH
CU
^
y
•rt
Z
CU
•u
cd
<4-t
rH
3
CO
rH
0)
•M
y
•rt
z
vO
PN.
<•
in
rH
4--
U 3
CO *
CO CU
^ 6
3
rH (4H
4-4 O
•
rJ U
CU CO
a. <4H
0.rH
O 3
CJ CO
-------
•H
•H 3
•H n E
* x
c *J oo
O -H C
tO tj -H
B) -H JJ
0) X tt)
tH O M
0 H
iH 4J
*3c£
O -H O
CJ X> ,
*H -rt
U .••*
V 0)
V3 C$
rH
(0
-H
4J Q)
CO CO
la
H
01
u
C
CO
CO
a
co
M
£
S
e
I
3
E
*2
fH
CO
U
•H
e
91
X
U
V*
to u
•H Ji
S 01
0 -H
01 01
-H S
£
.U
3 CO ,-*
U 3 u
-a co
CO * -H
CO 0) E
3 t-i
rH M-l O
j
i
i
x
u
^
CO
0)
CO
X O O
rH O.O
3 E CN
o o
CO 01
CO
0)
CO
0 0
rm
O \£>
y o
& 3
o
OO
e
tO 4J
4-1 (Q
x2
to
fH
1 CO
C 91 u
91 u CO
U S M
o 5 o
-a-
o
CO
3
0)
•H JO
3 3
O CO
rH
M
01
O> CD
D.rH
0 3
CJ CO
O
v£>
O*»
rH
I
2
CO
(0
m
i
I
Q)
fH
3
o
CO
e
M
-3-
to
QJ
CO
O
o
01
CM
fM
00
c
4J (TJ
0) rH
cj
•H
C
•H
01 U
ii
z
u
3
to 0)
O -H
U C
a. co
3 >.
u u
/f^
M
* -0
91 iH
0. C
to
>O
c?>
00
BCO ^N
3 u
CO « -H
3 h
fH >K O
1
1
0)
fH
3
o
03
C
rH
1
§to
£
CJ tO
0) O
1
00
e
a «
•U CO
9) ,H
SB 2
t ^
I g|
>< O CL>
z
u
3
0)
•H -H
£§
3 !».
U U
,_,
M
9)
M -a
91 -H
a e
a co
351
00
m
rH
m
o
i
i
fH a;
4J rH
x: xi
00 3
•H fH
rH O
CO CO
n
i^
00
i
i
I
CM
CM
00
e
0) rH
S ft.
U
O XI
01 £
O
U
CM
5
E
3
Ji rH
o to
01
JJ
•H 0
56
i-^.
r_j
rH
^S
O co
• ca
o ^^
i
i
i
i
0)
rH
X)
3
O
CO
e
M
03
1 0) Ot
X> E 10
3 «H in
CO
QJ
CO
O
fo
0
U
01
m
t
o\
\D
ff
4J CO
sS
u u S
•H f-l O
cx 3 pa
< O CO
0
S
E
3
•H 91
CO X
U O
O
-a-
CO
CM
TJ
u
in
o ~--
in
1
1
91
3
fH
C
in
o
o
o
fH
1
1
vO
^
00
C
CO *->
s£
U
f\i
«H O
O
to
S
•H
CO CO
CJ CO
E 0)
3 4J
•H CO
•0 rH
CO 3
U CO
tC
CO
o
CM
rH
O
0
1
1
rH
4J
00
rH OJ
CO rH
X 3
t-l rH
CM
CM
tH
CM
rH
CM
CO
O)
CO
O
XT O.
U
0)
Q
in
n
,-f
i?
CO <->
u n
S CO
> h
rH 4J
•H iH
to z
r*.
CO
o\
sD
rH
1
1
OJ
rH
rH
0
to
C
fH
01
rH
rO
3
i-H
o
U
C
rH
0
sr
o
CM
0)
C
iH 00
O r>4
CO Q)
fc
0>
ID 0) i-l U
> 4J 4J -H
fH *H CJ XJ
*H
|
S
3
C
•H
rH
00
X.D
CM
-
0)
rH
X)
3
rH
5
00
vD
91
to
O
o. -cr
g in
0 C-,
u
91
O
to
I'm
*H \O
rH CM
•§
to
o;
fO
00
c
CO 4J
4J CO
0) iH
CO
1 rH
01 4J
*H tO
tO 13 X
uSfi
rH
U
5
0)
•H
O
H
TJ CJ
O IH
CJ H
01
•0
•H
CJ JH
•H O
U
00 3
1 rH -H «H
rH 0
CO CO
01
rH 0)
X> rH
3 X)
rH CM 3
O cn fH
CO -* 0
c to
M
CO
0>
4J E CO
co w cn o O
co oo ao
-* CM £ \C
oo m o
0)
Q
to
01
E ro CM 1
•H rH fl 1
fH ^ r-»
3
CO
pv o^ in
m CM m
00 00 00
c c c
•U 10 *J CTJ 4J nj
rH tO
CO CQ
C 0) CJ
rH 0) OD 1-4 Xl
X CO *J « O E
iH 0! x: ot ox;
cj ;£ 3 x CJ oz
CM -*
rH O
CJ CO
CO C C
< N M
-w
T-l
CO
1 O
C rH C
-H CO ft
tsa co IM
0)
u -a oi
•H -H 4J
C W CD
D CJ O U 4-i
10 C rH C tH
*-* -H X. -H 3
CM CO C»".
•^ ^O iH
rH rH
CO
to -^
^ CM
O
O C
rH CO
1
1
01
3
rH
0
to
c
O)
rH
X)
3
rH
O
to
c
CM
rH
rH
O
CO O
01 Oi
ft V
.H O
XI O
3 CO
tO TH
°:
VO
U)
C
4J 10
•o
01
a) ro
u u
SfS
CM
O
c
CO
u
c 41
C t)
(Q *H
rH
^s at
•o
C -H
Q",
O
m
rH
c
CO
CO
CO
CM
1
1
1
01
rH
x>
3
rH
O
C/i
CO
CM
CM
in
°;
m
00
4J CO
o
QJ X>
Z 0
CM
rH
c/i
CO 01
3 TJ
O -H
C ^
c o
CO rH
CO CJ
.— « 01
fH T3
M -H
O
52
H O
O
vD
cy\
CO
rH
1
1
I
CM
00
m
CO
0)
to
o
o-o
E CM
O rH
CJ
0)
C,
1
1
s
rH
t-l
0>
TJ n)
•H Q)
.
C X
o o
E >->
J *"
CO
00
CM
CM
1
1
rH 01
4-1 rH
X. Xi
DC 3
-H rH
rH O
CO CO
r-
i— i
m
00
CO
OJ
to
0
a.
E
o
CJ
OJ
Q
m
CM
0>
C iu
•H 01
rH C
CO CD
^. 01
i
•o -o
o ^
91
CO
E C
3 O
O CO
to u
CT>
in
o
fH
H-3
-------
0 4J 0» <
.C IH 3
co E rnm
01 -H rtj £
IH _J > --
£ 00
H 6
O
d
0(m
art
* >,
C 4J OC
O -H C
CO u -rl
CO -H
01 X .
rH O «
O H
£ u
<0 C
CO IH O
rH O I
fc O.
O iH _.
£ rH O
O iH O
U J2 '
rH 0)
4J rH
00 3
W
00
C -U
•H C U
4J iH o
rH O
Ol PM
42
K rH
01 O
•§
•H O
O O,
EC
rH in
3
to
-HI
ig
CO
4j a)
CO CO
3 9
C
cm
e
•3
cO C
rH 60
O <
14
c
•H D
U rH
}H
*^ CO
iH 01
0 rH
< U
4J
CO
01
S
00 1
a o
•H U
•U 4J
CO O
0) 01
k. rH
00
c
4J
CO
a
oof
e co
iH «
4-1 CO AJ
CO 01 rH
QJ kl CO
S H V5
00 -u
C CO
4J
« CO U
CO 0) rH
01 U ffl
33 H in
a
4J
0>
X
00
S
1H
H
Cb
00
c
rH -H
CO u
u a
OJ rH
OJ rH
rH •• fl) IH
IH 01 4J QJ
D AJ CO 13
O 6
rH O
O Jd
u ad
O i-l
rH J3
O 3
u O
•H -a
^j Q)
CQ K:
o -n
rH ^
O 3
U CJ
vO
frj
o
CO
z
o
S
1
c
0
o
CO
i«
n H
&$
z
rH
CO
O
iH
S
6
1
o
Qu
CO
e oi
3 E a)
iH CO *J
T> !< «
O 01 Jd
cn rc a
A JJ
rH j:
3 01
0 iH
rH St
0
X
rH
rH
rH
VO
e
01
00
o
M
T)
£fj Ot
§*H
l-i
fJ O
T3 3
O rH
CO fa
£
rH
-H
U
01
3 CO
?-3
CO W
c
01
00
o
T3
01
3 co
rH
O
CN
rH
cu
XJ
CO
e
CO
3 U
iH O
•O -H
0 JS
« P
O
rH
CO
01
•o
•H
C
9
U
B
S
•H
•8
CO
rH
O
o>
rH
ct)
l-i
cfl
QJ
*rt
O
J=
3
•H
"8
CO
5
CO
rH QJ
(0 4-1
r-l fH
3 >
4-1 rH
CO ^
SB CO
3 01
0) -H 3
CO J-i iH
tO O T.
AJ rH O
O A £
rX U CC
\O rH
m tyi
-3- CM
r^ O
rH
a
c
o
o
H-4
-------
APPENDIX I
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING (SIC 355)
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION FOR 1975, 1977, AND 1983
BY STATE AND EPA REGION
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
WINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
'III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
746.
0.
210.
199.
4743.
101.
.'246.
349.
1217.
1417.
32.
0.
6299.
234L.
933.
688.
541.
369.
278.
1290.
6382.
2568.
687 ,
372.
516.
31.
83,
32.
600,
4712.
32.
4542.
4497.
55 *
7886,
696.
870.
6342,
1621 .
3294.
55.
1037.
1474.
32.
350.
662.
1397,
176.
3408.
96,
79000,
11977.
9254,
as 19.
131 21-.
23185.
2702.
2224 v
066 .
5005.
2267.
(Dry Wt.)
481.
0.
136.
128.
3056.
65.
1447.
225.
734.
913,
20.
0.
4058.
1508.
601.
443.
348.
238.
179,
831 .
4434.
1655 .
443.
240.
333.
20.
54.
20.
386 .
3036.
20.
2927 .
2898.
35.
5081.
449.
561 .
4086,
1045.
2122.
35.
668,
950.
20.
226.
427.
900.
114.
2196.
62,
50900 .
7717,
5962,
5632,
8454.
14938.
1/92,
1433.
236,
3224.
1460.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
746.
0.
210.
199.
4743.
101.
2246.
349.
1217.
1417.
32.
0.
6299.
2341.
933 .
683.
541.
369.
278.
1290.
6882.
2568.
o87.
372,
516.
31 .
83.
32.
600,
4712 .
32.
4542 .
4497.
55 .
7886.
696.
870.
6342.
1621 ,
3294.
55.
1037.
1474.
32.
350.
662.
1397.
176.
3408.
96.
79000.
119/7,
9254.
8QL9,
13121.
23135.
2732,
2224.
366.
5005.
2267.
(Dry Wt.)
481.
0.
136.
128.
3056.
65.
1447.
225.
784.
913.
20.
0.
4058.
1508.
601.
443,
348.
233.
179.
331.
4434.
1655.
443.
240.
333.
20.
54.
20.
386.
3036.
20.
2927.
2898.
35.
5081.
449.
561.
4086.
1045.
2122 .
35.
668.
950,
20.
226 .
427.
900.
114.
2196.
62,
60900.
7717.
5962.
5602.
8454-.
14933.
1792.
1433.
236.
3224.
1460,
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
174.
0.
49.
46.
1107.
24.
524.
82.
284,
331.
7.
0.
1470.
546.
218.
161.
126.
86.
65.
301.
1606.
599.
160.
37.
121.
7 ,
19.
7.
140.
L100.
7.
1Q60.
1050.
13.
1841.
163.
203.
1480.
378.
769.
13.
242 .
344.
7.
82.
155.
326.
41.
795,
22 ,
10440,
2796.
2160.
2059.
3063.
5412.
649.
519.
85.
1168.
529,
Metals
28.3
0.
8.1
7.7
183.2
3.9
86.8
13. 5
47.0
54.8
1 .2
0.
243,3
90.4
36.1
26.6
20,9
14.3
10.7
49.0
265.9
99.2
26.6
14.4
19.9
1,2
3,2
1.2
23.2
182.0
1.2
175.5
173.7
2.1
304.6
26.9
33.6
245.0
62.6
127 .2
2.1
40.1
57.0
1 .2
13.5
25.6
54.0
6.8
131.7
3.7
3052.0
462,7
357,5
340,7
506.9
095,7
107,5
US. 9
14.1
193.3
87.6
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
11.4
0.
3.2
3.0
72.2
1.5
34.2
5.3
18.5
21.6
* 5
0.
95.8
35.6
14.2
10.5
8.2
5.6
4.2
19.6
104.7
39.1
10.5
5,7
7.9
.5
1.3
.5
9.1
71.7
.5
69.1
68.4
.8
120,0
10.6
13.2
96.5
24.7
50.1
.8
15.8
22 . 4
. 5
5.3
10.1
21.3
2.7
51.9
1.5
1202.0
182 . 2
140.8
134.2
199,6
352.8
42,3
33.0
5.6
76,1
34.5
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Cyanide
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Sweepings &
Grindings
260.
0.
73.
69.
1653.
35.
783.
122 .
424.
494.
11.
0.
2195.
816.
325,
240.
189,
129.
97.
449.
2399.
895.
240.
130.
180.
11.
29.
11.
209.
1642.
11.
1583,
1568,
19.
2749,
243.
303.
2210.
565.
1148.
19,
362.
514.
11 .
122.
231.
487.
61.
1188.
34.
27535.
4175.
3225.
3074,
4573.
8001.
970.
775.
128.
1 744 .
790.
1-1
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
ETA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.
78.
0.
^O
21.
498.
11.
236.
37,
128.
149.
3.
0.
662.
246.
98.
72,
57.
39.
29.
135.
723.
270.
72 .
39.
54.
3 «
9.
3.
63.
495.
3.
477.
472.
6.
829.
73.
91.
666.
170,
346,
6 #
109.
Ib5,
3.
37.
70.
L47,
19.
353,
10,
3300.
1253.
972,
927,
137?.
2436.
292,
234,
38,
526,
238.
)(Dry Wt.)
34.
0.
10.
9.
' 219.
5.
104.
16.
56.
65.
1.
0.
291.
108.
43.
32,
25.
17.
13,
60.
318.
119.
32.
17.
24.
1 .
4.
i ,
28.
218.
i ,
210.
208.
3.
364.
32.
40.
293.
75.
152.
3.
48.
68.
1 .
16.
31.
65.
a.
157,
4.
3650.
553.
428,
407.
606.
1071 .
129.
103.
17.
231.
105,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
78.
0.
22 .
21.
498.
11.
236.
37.
128.
149,
3.
0.
662,
246,
98.
72.
57.
39,
29.
135,
723.
270,
72.
39.
54.
3.
9.
3.
63.
495.
3.
477,
472,
6.
829.
73.
91 .
666.
170,
346.
6.
109.
155.
3.
37.
70.
147.
19.
358,
10.
8300.
1258.
972.
927.
L379.
2436.
292.
234.
38.
526.
238,
(Dry Wt.)
34.
0.
10.
9.
219.
5.
104.
16.
56.
65.
1,
0.
291.
108.
43.
32.
25.
17.
13.
60.
318.
119.
32.
17.
24.
1.
4.
1.
28,
218.
1.
210.
208.
3.
364.
32.
40.
293.
75.
152.
3.
48.
68.
1.
16.
31.
65.
8.
157.
4.
3650 .
553.
428.
407.
60-6%
1 071 .
129.
103.
17.
231.
105.
Flammable
Solvents
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils
29.7
0.
8.4
7.9
188.6
4.0
89.3
13.9
48.4
56.4
1.3
0.
250.5
93.1
37,1
27.4
21.5
14.7
11.0
51.3
273.7
102.1
27.3
14.8
20.5
1.2
3.3
1.3
23.8
IS/. 4
1.3
180.7
178.9
2,2
313.6
27.7
34.6
252.2
64.5
131 .0
2.2
41.3
58.6
1.3
13,9
26.3
55.5
7.0
135. 5
3.8
3142.0
476.4
368.1
350.8
521; 9
922 . 1
110.6
88,5
14.6
199.0
90.2
Solution
2.0
0.
.6
.5
12.4
.3
5.9
.9
3.2
3.7
.1
0.
16,5
6,1
2.4
1.8
1.4
1.0
.7
3.4
18.0
6.7
1.8
1.0
1.4
.1
o
. 1
1.6
12.3
.1
11.9
11.8
. 1
20.7
1,8
2.3
16.6
4.2
8.6
.1
2*7
3.9
,1
.9
1.7
3.7
.5
8,9
,3
207.0
31.4
24.2
23.1
34 .-4-
60.8
7.3
5,0
1 .0
13.1
5.9
Cyanide
.8
0.
.2
.2
5.3
,1
2.5
.4
1.4
1.6
.0
0.
7.0
2.6
1.0
.0
.6
.4
.3
1.4
7.7
2.9
.8
.4
.6
.0
.1
.0
.7
5.2
.0
5.1
5.0
. 1
8.8
.8
1.0
7.1
1.8
3.7
.1
1 . 2
1.6
.0
.4
.7
1 .6
^ O
3.S
.1
88.0
13.3
10.3
9,8
14.6
25.8
3.1
2.5
,4
5.6
2.5
Sweepings &
Grlndings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
1-2
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)(Dry Wt.)
35.
0.
10.
9.
%J *
105.
16.
57,
66,
1.
0,
295,
110.
44.
32.
25.
17,
13.
60.
O A-.W. +
120,
32 ,
17,
24,
1.
4,
1.
28.
221 .
1 .
213,
211 ,
3,
369,
33,
41 ,
297.
76.
154.
3.
49,
69.
1.
L6,
31,
65.
8,
1 60 ,
5,
3700.
561.
433.
413.
6t5.
1086.
130.
104,
17.
234,
106.
14.
0.
4.
4.
90.
43.
7,
23.
27.
1.
0.
120.
44.
18.
13.
10.
-7 t
5 .
24,
131 ,
49.
13.
7.
10.
1 .
2.
1.
11 .
89.
1.
86.
05.
1 .
150.
13.
17.
120,
31,
63,
1 .
20.
28.
1.
7.
13,
27 .
3,
65.
2,
1500,
227.
176.
167.
249.
440.
53.
42.
7.
95.
43.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
35.
0.
10.
9,
•f
105.
16.
57.
66.
1.
0.
295.
110.
44.
32.
25.
17.
13.
60.
120.
32.
17.
24.
1 .
4.
1.
28.
221 «
1,
213.
211.
3.
369.
33 .
41.
297.
76.
154.
3.
49.
69.
1 .
16,
31.
65.
8.
160.
5.
3700.
Sol.
433.
413.
615,
1086,
130,
104,
17.
234.
106.
(Dry Wt.)
14.
0.
4.
4.
90,
43.
7.
23.
27.
1 .
0.
120.
44.
IS.
13.
10.
7.
5.
24.
131.
49.
13.
7.
10.
1.
1 .
11.
89.
1.
86.
S5,
1.
150.
13.
17.
120.
31.
63.
1 .
20.
28.
1.
7.
13.
27 .
3.
65,
2,
3500.
227 ,
176,
167.
249.
440.
53.
42.
7.
95.
43 ,
Flammable Heavy
Solvents Metals
•6.
0,
2 f
2.
41.
1.
19.
3.
10.
12.
0.
0.
54.
20.
9.
6.
5.
3.
2,
11.
59,
6.
3.
4.
0.
1.
0.
S.
41.
0,
39.
39.
0.
68.
6.
7,
55.
14.
28.
0.
y.
13.
0.
3.
6.
12.
29.
1.
680.
103.
80.
76.
1,13.
200.
24.
19,
3.
43,
20.
.3
0,
.1
.1
1.7
.0
.8
.1
.4
.5
.0
0.
2.3
.9
.3
.3
.1
. 1
. 5
2.5
.9
.3
,1
.0
.0
.0
1 2
1.7
.0
1.7
1.7
.0
2.9
.3
.3
2.3
,6
1.2
.0
.4
.5
.0
. 1
.5
.1
1.3
.0
29,0
4.4
3.4
3.2
4.0
S.5
1.0
.8
. ]
1,8
,8
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
.3
0.
.1
1.7
.0
.8
.1
.4
.5
.0
0,
,3
.3
1 2
,2
.1
.5
2.4
.9
t 2
.1
.0
.0
.0
1.7
.0
1.6
1.6
.0
2.8
.3
•") O
.6
1,2
.0
,4
,5
.0
. 1
t 2
* 5
, 1
1.2
.0
28.0
4,2
3.3
3.1
4.7
8.2
1.0
.8
.1
1 .8
.8
.7
0.
.2
4.3
.1
2.0
.3
1.1
1.3
.0
0.
5.7
2 . 1
.9
.6
.5
.3
.3
1,2
6.3
2.3
.6
,3
.5
.0
.1
,0
.5
4.3
.0
4.1
4.1
.0
7 .2
.6
.3
5.8
J .5
3.0
,0
.9
1.3
.0
.3
.6
1.3
3. I
.1
72.0
10,9
8.4
8.0
12.0
21.1
2.5
2 .0
.3
4.6
2.1
Sweepings &
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.'
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
1-3
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION -- COATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
State R
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
EPA
egion
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.HDry Wt.) (Wet Wt.)
94.
0.
27.
25.
600.
13.
294.
44.
154.
179.
4.
0.
797.
296.
118.
87,
68.
47.
35.
163.
871.
325.
87.
47.
65.
4,
11.
4,
76.
596.
4.
575.
569,
7.
998.
08.
110.
803.
205.
417.
7»
131.
187.
4.
44.
84.
177.
22.
431.
12.
73.
0.
21.
19.
462.
10.
219.
34.
119.
138.
3.
0.
614.
228.
91.
67.
S3.
36.
27.
126.
671.
250.
67.
36.
50.
3.
8.
3.
58.
459.
3.
443.
438.
5.
769.
68.
85.
618.
158.
321.
5 *
101.
144.
3.
34,
65,
136,
17,
332,
9,
94.
0.
27.
25.
600.
13.
284.
44.
154.
179.
4.
0.
797.
296.
118.
87,
68.
47,
35.
163.
871 .
325.
87.
47.
65,
4.
11.
4.
76.
596,
4,
575,
569.
7,
998.
88.
1 10.
803.
205.
417.
7.
131.
187.
4.
44,
84.
177.
22 .
431,
12,
(Pry Wt^)
73,
0.
21 .
19.
462.
10.
219.
34.
119.
138.
3.
0.
614.
228.
91.
67.
53.
36.
27.
126.
671.
250.
67.
36.
50.
3.
8.
3.
58.
459.
3.
443.
438.
5.
769.
68.
85.
618.
158.
321.
5.
101.
144.
3.
34.
65.
136.
17.
332.
9,
Flammable
Solvents
55.
0.
15.
15.
348.
7.
165.
26.
89.
104.
*•)
0.
462.
172,
69.
51.
40.
27.
20.
95.
505.
189.
50.
27.
38.
O #
6.
O ^
44.
346.
•o
333.
330.
4.
579.
51.
64.
466.
L19.
040 t
4.
76.
108.
2 *
26.
49.
103.
13.
250.
7.
Heavy-
Metals
7.0
0.
2.0
1.9
44.3
.9
21.0
3.3
11.4
13.2
.3
0.
58.8
21 .9
8.7
6.4
5.1
3.4
2.6
12.0
64.3
24.0
6.4
3.5
4.8
.3
.8
.3
5.6
44.0
.3
42 , 4
42.0
.5
73.7
6.5
3.1
59.2
15.1
30.8
.5
9,7
13.8
.3
3.3
6.2
13.0
1 .6
31.8
,9
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
.1
0.
.0
.0
.8
.0
,4
.1
n
,3
.0
0.
1.1
.4
* 2
. I
. 1
.1
.0
.2
1,2
.5
,1
,1
,1
.0
.0
.0
.1
.8
.0
.3
.8
.0
1.4
. 1
i
1 .1
.3
.6
.0
, 2
.3
.0
.1
.1
» "*
.0
,6
,0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindlngs
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
ioooo.
7700.
10000.
7700.
5300.
738.0
14,0
0.
1516.
1171.
1116,
1661.
2935.
352.
232.
46.
633,
287.
1167.
902.
860.
1279,
2260.
271.
217.
36.
488,
221.
1516.
1171.
1116.
1661.
2935.
352.
202.
46.
633.
287.
1167.
902,
860.
L279.
2260,
271,
217,
36.
488.
221
879.
679.
647.
963.
1702,
204.
163.
27.
367,
166.
111,9
86.4
82. 4
1 22.6
216.6
26.0
20,8
3.4
46.3
*•) -1 ^ O
2.1
1.6
1.6
2,3
4.1
* 5
,4
.1
,9
.4
0,
0,
0.
-0-,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1-4
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste Hazardous Waste Fi
(Wet Wt.HDry Wt.) (Wet Wt.) (Dry Vt.) So
1634,
0.
461 ,
435.
L0386,
220 ,
491?.
7o5.
26c>6.
31 04,
69.
0.
13793.
51 26.
2044.
L507,
1134.
303.
608 .
2824.
ISO"7! .
5624.
1S05.
814,
1 131,
68.
182.
69,
1313.
10313.
69,
9947.
9843.
120.
17269.
1525,
1905.
13803.
3550.
7213.
120.
2271,
3223,
69.
767.
1450.
3059,
306.
7463.
211..
173000,
26228.
20265.
J 9,513.
28734.
50773,
6092 ,
487 1 ,
fiOL .
1091.?',
4964,
1634.
0.
461.
435,
10386,
220 .
4919,
765,
2666.
3104.
69,
0.
13793,
5126.
2044.
1507.
1 134.
80S.
60 0.
2324,
15071.
5624.
1505,
8U.
i 1. 3 1 .
68,
132.
69.
1313.
10318.
69.
9947.
9S4S.
120.
17249.
1525.
1905.
13888.
3550.
7213.
120.
2271,
3228.
69.
767.
1450.
3059.
386 ,
7463.
211,
173000.
26228,
20265.
19313,
28734,
50773.
,".092,
4071.
001.
J 0 ''',/?.
4964,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
A v
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
',).
0,
0,
0.
0,
0 ,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
ammable Heavy
Ivents Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
Acids/Alkali Sweepings &
Oils Solution Pvan-fHo fli--inH-fr*»e
J^^bt^ £-v
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0. 0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0 ,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0 .
0,
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
1-5
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)(Dry Wt.)
661.
0.
186.
176.
4202.
89.
1990.
309.
1079.
1256.
28.
0.
353 1 .
2074.
327.
610,
47°.
327.
246.
I 143.
60°8.
2276.
60'?,
329.
459.
27 »
74.
23.
531 .
4175,
28.
4025.
5985,
49.
* 3
47,1
5,9
114,9
3.2
2664,0
403.9
312. I
297,4
442,5
731,8
93,8
75,0
12.3
loS.S
76. J
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
10.2
0.
2.9
2. 7
64.8
1.4
30.7
4.8
16.6
19.4
.4
0.
8n. 1
32.0
12,8
9,4
7.4
5.0
3,8
17.6
94,1
35,1
9,4
5,1
7. 1
.4
1. 1
.4
8.2
64.4
.4
62.1
61.5
,7
107.3
9.5
11.9
86.7
T-> t o
45.0
.7
14.2
20.2
.4
4.8
9.1
19.1
2.4
46.6
1.3
1080.0
163.7
126,5
120,6
179,4
3 1. 7 , 0
33,0
30, 4
5,0
68,4
31 , 0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
-o.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Cyanide
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0 ,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
Sweepings &
Grindings
225.
0.
64,
60.
1433.
30.
679.
105.
368.
428.
10.
0.
1903.
707.
282.
208.
163.
I 12.
84.
390.
2079.
776.
208.
112.
156.
9.
25.
10.
181.
1423,
10.
1372.
1359.
17.
2302.
210.
263,
1916.
490.
995.
17.
313.
445.
10.
106.
200.
•)22.
53.
1029.
29.
23365.
3618.
2796,
2664.
3964.
7004,
040.
672.
Ill,
1512.
605,
1-6
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/yearl
Total Potentially Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
78.
0.
22 +
21,
498.
11.
236.
37.
128.
1 49.
3 .
0.
662.
246.
98.
72.
57.
39.
29,-
135,
723.
270.
T~)
39.
54.
3.
9.
3.
63.
4°5,
O *
47'.
472.
c? *
8??.
73.
91 ,
666.
1 70.
346.
•'3 >
I 09.
155,
3.
37,
70,
147.
L9,
358.
10,
8300,
1258,
972,
927,
1377.
2416.
292,
234.
38.
526,
238 ,
(Dry Wt.)
34.
0.
10.
9,
219.
5.
104.
16.
56.
65.
1 .
0.
291.
108,
43,
32,
25.
17.
13.
60.
318.
119.
32.
17.
24.
1.
4.
1 ,
28.
218,
1 ,
210,
208 .
-x
364 ,
32,
40,
293.
75 .
152,
3.
40,
69,
t .
16.
3t .
65.
8.
] 57,
4.
3650 .
L' To 3 *
420.
40 7.
606.
] 0 ; ] .
129 .
103,
L7,
231.
105.
Hazardous Waste Flammable
(Wet Wt.)
78.
0.
22 .
2.1.
498.
11.
236.
37.
128.
149.
3,
0.
662,
246.
98.
72.
57.
39.
29 .
L35.
723.
270.
72.
39.
54.
3.
9 +
3.
63.
495.
3.
477.
472.
6,
829,
73.
91.
666.
170.
346.
6.
109.
155,
3.
37.
70,
147,
19.
358 .
LO,
8300,
1258.
<372 ,
927 *
13"'9.
2436,
Of)'") t
234.
33.
526,
238 ,
(Dry Wt.) Solvents
34.
0.
10.
9.
219.
5.
104.
16.
56.
65.
1 .
0.
291 .
108,
43,
32.
25,
17,
13.
60.
318.
119,
32,
1 7,
24 .
1,
4.
1 .
28,
2:1 f).
1.
210,
208,
3.
364 ,
32,
40.
293,
75.
152,
3.
48,
60,
t ,
1 6.
31 ,
65,
8,
157,
<»,
3650,
553.
420,
407,
606,
1071.
129.
103.
1 '',
231 ,
1017,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
') ,
0.
0.
0.
Heavy
Acids/Alkali Sweepings &
Metals Oils
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 ,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
o ,
0,
0 ,
0,
0,
0,
0,
29.7
0.
8.4
7.9
188.6
4.0
89.3
13.9
48.4
56.4
1.3
0.
250.5
93.1
3"'.l
27.4
21.5
14.7
11.0
51.3
273.7
102.1
27,3
14.8
20.5
1.2
3,3
1.3
23.8
187,4
1.3
UiO.7
17S.«
") O
313.6
27.7
34 . 6
2 5 ° * 2
64.5
1 3 1. . 0
"> » °
41.3
58,6
L.3
13.9
26,3
5 5 + b
7.0
135,5
3,1)
3142.0
476.4
368. L
350,8
523 .9
922. L
t 1 0 , 6
f)S . 5
14,6
L9",0
90,2
Solution
2.0
0.
.6
.5
12.4
.3
5.9
,9
3.2
3 7
.1
0.
J 6 . 5
6. 1
2,4
1,8
L.4
1.0
.7
3.4
18,0
6,7
J ,8
1 .0
1,4
, I
# o
.1
1,6
12.3
. L
U . 9
J 1 .!j
. 1.
20.7
J .0
2.3
J6.6
4.2
S.6
. 1
2.7
3.9
, 1
.9
1 .7
3.7
fr I.J
S.9
,3
207.0
31.4
24 . 2
23,7
34 . 4
oO.O
7-3
5,3
1 , 0
13, I
5, 9
Cyanide Grindings
.8
0.
t 2
o
5.3
.1
2.5
,4
J .4
1.6
.0
0.
7,0
2,6
1,0
,8
,6
,4
.3
1,4
7.7
2 . 9
.8
.4
.6
.0
.1
.0
.7
5.2
,0
5.1
5.0
.1
8.8
,8
t .0
7 . J
1 ,!.<
3,7
, I
1.2
t .6
,0
.4
^ -j
1 .6
o
3.8
, I
38.0
13.3
10,3
9.8
14,6
25, S3
3, I
2,5
.4
(t t 6
^ t l~j
,0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0 *
0.
0.
o f
1-7
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
miNE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.MDry wt.)
35 »
0.
10,
9.
TT")
5 *
105.
16.
57.
66.
t .
0.
295.
110.
44.
52 .
25.
17.
13.
60,
322 .
120.
32,
17.
24.
1.
4,
1.
28,
221 ,
1.
213.
21.1.
3.
369.
33.
41 .
297,
76,
154,
3,
49,
69.
1.
16.
31.
65,
S,
160.
5.
3700.
561 .
433.
413.
615.
1086.
130.
104.
17,
234.
106,
14.
0.
4.
4.
90.
") ^
43.
7.
23.
27.
1 ,
0.
120.
44.
IS.
13.
10.
7 (
5 .
24 .
131.
49,
13.
7.
10.
1 .
2.
1.
11 ,
89,
1 .
86.
35.
1 ,
150.
13.
17.
120 .
31 .
63.
1 .
20.
28.
1 .
7.
13.
27,
3.
65,
2 ,
1500.
227 *
176.
167.
249.
440.
53 ,
42.
/,
95.
43.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
35.
0.
10.
9.
222 *
5 .
105,
16.
57.
66.
1 .
0.
295.
110,
44.
32.
25.
17.
13.
60.
322.
120.
32.
17.
24.
1 ,
A.
1 .
28.
22 1 *
1 .
213.
211.
3.
369.
33.
41.
297.
76.
154.
3.
49.
69.
1.
16.
31.
65.
8.
160,
5 »
3700,
561.
433.
413,
615,
1086,
130.
104.
L7.
234.
106,
(Dry Wt.)
14.
0.
4.
4.
90.
"* t
43.
7.
23.
O~?
3 .
0,
120.
44.
IS.
13.
10,
7,
5,
24.
131,
49.
13.
7 ,
10.
1 .
2 #
1 .
11 .
89.
1 ,
86,
85.
1 ,
150.
13.
17.
120.
31 .
63.
1 .
20,
20.
L .
7.
13.
27.
3.
65.
o t
1500.
TT7
176!
167.
249 ,
440.
53,
42,
7 *
95.
43.
1-8
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
6.
0.
. *~i ^
•"] +
41.
1 .
19.
3.
10.
12.
0.
0.
54.
20,
8.
6,
5,
3.
2 ,
LI.
59.
2? ,
6,
3.
4.
0.
1,
0.
sJ *
41,
0.
39.
39,
0.
68.
6 .
7.
55 .
14.
22.
0.
9.
13.
0.
3.
6.
12.
o t
29 .
1. .
680,
103.
00.
76.
113,
200.
24 .
19.
3.
43.
20,
Metals
.3
0.
.1
, 1
1. 7
.0
.8
. 1
.4
.5
.0
0.
2.3
,9
.3
.3
t 2
. 1
.1
.5
2.5
, 9
.3
. 1
t '-i
.0
,0
.0
* 2
1. 7
,0
1.7
1. ~>
.0
2.9
.3
.3
2.3
.6
1.2
.0
.4
* 5
.0
.1
* '"'
,5
,1
1 .3
.0
29.0
4.4
3.4
3.2
4.8
8.5
1 ,0
.8
.1
1.0
.0
Acids/Alkali
Oils
.3
0.
.1
.1
1.7
.0
.8
.1
,4
* u
.0
0,
2,2
,8
.3
t 'i
t 2
.1
. 1
.5
2.4
,9
'-i
. 1
t 2
,0
.0
.0
f 2
1,7
,0
1.6
1.6
.0
2.8
t 2
.3
2*2
.6
1.2
.0
.4
.5
.0
.1
t o
+ 5
.1
1 .2
.0
28.0
4 . 2
3.3
3.1
4.7
"I t P
1.0
.8
.1
1.8
,8
Solution
,7
0,
T
, 2
4,3
.1
2,0
.3
1,1
1,3
.0
0.
5.7
2.1
.9
.6
,5
.3
,3
1.2
6.3
2.3
,6
,3
.5
.0
, 1
.0
.5
4.3
.0
4, 1
4.1
.0
7.2
.6
.8
5.8
1 .5
3.0
.0
,9
1.3
.0
.3
.6
1.3
O
3. 1
. 1
72,0
10.9
8.4
8.0
12^.0-
21.1
*-> J3J
2.0
,3
4*o
2 . 1
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindtnes
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
o. -
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
-------
SPECIAL IHDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — COATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII'
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
85.
0.
24.
23.
540.
11 .
256.
40,
139.
161.
4.
0.
718.
267.
106.
78.
62.
42.
32.
147.
784.
293,
78,
42.
59.
4,
9,
4,
68.
537.
4.
517,
512.
6.
898.
79.
99.
72'1 4
185.
375.
6.
118.
168.
4.
40.
75.
159.
20.
388.
11.
(Dry Wt.)
63.
0.
18.
17.
402.
9.
190.
30,
103.
120.
3.
0.
534.
199.
79.
58.
46.
31.
24,
109.
534.
218.
58.
32.
44.
3.
7.
3.
51.
400.
3.
385.
381 .
5 ,
669.
59.
74.
538.
138.
279 ,
5.
88.
125.
3.
30.
56.
118.
15,
289.
8.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
85.
0.
24.
23.
540.
11.
256.
40.
139.
161,
4.
0.
713.
267.
106.
78.
62.
42.
32,
147.
784.
293.
78.
42.
59,
4.
Q t
4.
68.
537.
4.
517.
512.
6.
898.
79.
99.
722.
185.
375.
6.
118.
168.
4.
40.
75.
139.
20.
383.
1 ] .
(Dry Wt.)
63.
0.
18.
17.
402,
9,
190.
30.
103.
120.
3.
0,
534.
199.
79.
58.
46,
31,
24.
109.
584.
218.
58.
32,
44.
3.
7.
3.
51.
400.
3,
385.
381.
5 *
669.
59.
74.
533.
138.
279 *
5 ,
88.
125.
3,
30.
56.
118.
15.
289.
8.
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
46.
0.
13.
12.
291 .
6.
138.
21,
75.
37.
-) t
0.
387.
144.
57,
42.
33,
23,
17.
79.
423.
153.
42.
23.
32.
*1
£j *
") ^
37.
289.
2 t
279.
276.
3 *
484.
43,
53 *
390,
100.
202,
3.
64,
91 ,
2 ,
T->
41 .
86.
11 .
209.
6.
Metals
6.9
0.
1.9
1.3
43.8
.9
20.7
3.2
1 1.2
13. I
.3
0,
58.1
21.6
8.6
6.3
5.0
3.4
2,6
11,9
63.5
23.7
6.3
3,4
4.8
.3
.8
.3
5.5
43.5
.3
41 .9
41.5
» -J
72,8
6,4
8.0
58.5
15.0
30.4
4 5
9.6
13.6
,3
3.2
6.1
12.9
1.6
31 .4
.9
Acids/Alkali Sweepings &
Oils _Solution
.1
0,
,0
.0
.8
.0
.4
.1
.3
.0
0,
1.1
.4
t o
. 1
,1
.1
.0
<"%
1.2
.5
.1
. 1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.1
.8
.0
,8
,8
,0
1,4
,1
1 2
1, 1
.3
,6
.0
» ^
,3
,0
. ]
. 1
^ 2
.0
.6
.0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
Cyanide
• -
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
Grind ings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0,
TOTALS
REGION I
n
HI
tv
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
x
9000.
6700.
9000.
6700.
4853,
729,0
14,0
0.
0,
1364 .
1054.
1005.
1495.
2641.
317,
253,
42,
570,
258,
1016.
735.
743.
1113.
1966.
236.
189.
31.
424,
192,
1364.
1054.
1005,
1495,
2641.
317.
233.
42 .
570,
253.
1016.
785,
748.
1113.
1966,
236.
189.
31 ,
424 .
192 .
736.
568.
542.
806.
1 424.
171.
1.37,
22,
307,
139.
110
85
31
121
214
25
20
3
46
20
. 5
.4
,4
,1
.0
^ ~f
, 5
.4
,2
f o
2
1
1
2
4
,1
* 6
.6
.3
. J
» 5
.4
.1
.9
.4
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1-9
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(Wcg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
State Re
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
EPA
8 ion
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet _Wt.)
1521.
0.
429.
405,
9665.
205.
4577.
712>
2491.
2009,
64,
0.
12336.
4/71.
1002.
1402.
1 L02,
/52.
366.
2628,
1.4026,
5234.
I40L,
'S8.
1052.
63.
170.
64.
| T1O
9602,
64.
9257.
9165,
112.
16071.
1419,
1.773,
12925,
3304.
6712.
112.
21 14.
3004.
64,
714.
L350.
2046.
359 ,
6945.
196.
161000.
24409,
10859,
17973,
26741,
47251.
5669.
4533,
746 .
J0199,
4620,
(Dry Wt.)
1521.
0.
429.
405.
9665,
205.
4577.
712.
2481,
2039,
64.
0.
12S36.
4771,
1^0? *
1 402 .
1102.
752.
1)66 .
262F5,
1402.6,
5234.
140] ,
758.
1052.
63.
170.
64.
t OO O
9602,
64.
9257,
9165,
112,
16071 ,
1419.
1773,
12925,
3304,
6712,
112,
21 14,
3004 .
64.
7J4.
1350.
28-46,
359,
6945,
196.
161000.
24409.
18859.
17973,
26741 ,
47251.
5669.
4533.
746 .
10199.
4620,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.) (Dry
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0-
0.
0,
0.
Wt.)
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 .
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0 ,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 ,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
Flammable
Solvents
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 *
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
Solution
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
Cyanide
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0 ,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
Sweepings &
Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0 ,
0 *
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0 ,
I-16
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
State
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
WINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
EPA
Region
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.]
793.
0.
224.
211.
5043.
107.
23SL
371.
12°4.
L507.
34.
0.
6697.
2489.
992.
732.
575.
393.
295.
1371.
7313.
2731.
731.
395.
549.
33.
89.
34.
638,
13010,
34.
4830.
4732.
58.
8385.
740.
925.
6743.
1724.
3502.
53,
1103.
1567.
34.
373.
704.
L485.
L87.
3623.
102.
04000.
12735.
9840.
9377.
13952.
24653.
2958.
2365.
3!.!9 .
5321 .
2410.
l(Dry Wt.)
604.
0.
170,
161 .
3842.
32.
1S20.
283.
986,
1148.
26.
0.
5103.
1896.
756.
557,
43.8.
299.
225.
1045.
5575.
2081.
557.
301.
413.
25.
67.
26.
486.
3817.
26.
3680.
3643.
44.
6388.
564,
705.
5138.
1313.
2668.
44.
840.
1194.
26.
284.
536.
1131.
J43.
276 t .
78.
64000,
9703,
7497,
7145,
10630.
L8703,
2254.
100?.
296.
4054 ,
1336.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
727.
0.
205.
194.
4622.
98,
2189,
340 ,
1186,
1391.
3L .
0.
6139.
2282 .
910.
671.
527.
360.
271.
1257.
6708.
2503.
670.
362.
503.
30.
81.
31.
584.
4392.
31 ,
4427.
4333.
53.
7686.
679.
348.
6181 .
1580.
3210.
53,
1011,
1437.
31,
342.
645,
1361.
172,
3322,
94,
77000,
1 1674,
9020.
8596,
12789,
22598.
2711 .
2168,
357,
4878.
2209.
(Drvjft.)
538.
0.
152.
143.
3422.
73.
1621.
252.
878.
1023.
23.
0.
4545.
1689.
673.
496.
390.
266.
200.
930.
4966.
1353,
496.
268.
373.
22 ,
60.
23.
433.
3399.
23.
3277.
3245.
40.
5690.
502.
628,
4576.
1170.
2376.
40.
748.
1064.
23.
253.
478.
1003.
127.
2459.
69.
57000.
3642,
66/7,
6363,
9467,
1672'^,
2007,
1605,
264,
36 LI,
1635,
Flammable
Solvents
131.
0.
37,
35.
832.
18.
394.
61.
214.
249.
6.
0,
1 105,
411,
164,
121.
95,
65.
49.
T~>A
1208.
451 .
121.
65.
9L .
5 .
15.
6.
105,
327,
6.
7V/.
739.
10,
1384.
1 22 .
153.
1113.
285.
578 .
10.
182.
259,
6.
62.
116.
245,
31.
598,
17.
13064.
2102.
1624.
1548.
2303.
4069,
408,
3'30 .
64,
870,
398.
s Heavy
Metals
21.8
0.
6.1
5.8
138.4
2.9
65,5
10.2
35 . 5
41 ,4
.9
0.
183.8
68.3
27 , 2
20.1
15.8
10,8
8.1
37.6
200.3
74.9
20,1
10,3
L5.1
.9
2.4
.9
17.5
137.5
.9
132,5
131 .2
1.6
230.1
20.3
25.4
105.0
47.3
96. I
1.6
30.3
43.0
.9
10,2
19,3
40.8
5.1
99,4
2.3
2305,0
349,5
2^0.0
257,3
382,8
676.5
91.2
64,9
10.7
[46,0
66. J
Acids/Alkali
01 Is^ Solution Cyanide
37.5
0.
10.6
10.0
238.3
5.1
112.9
17.5
61.2
71 .2
1,6
0,
316,5
117,6
46.9
34,6
27. 2
13.6
13.9
64.8
345,3
129,1
34.5
18.7
25.9
1.6
4.2
1,6
30.1
236.8
1.6
228.3
226 . 0
2,3
396.3
35.0
43.7
318,7
81,5
165.5
2,3
52.1
74.1
1.6
L7.6
33,3
70,2
3.9
171.3
4.8
3970.0
601.9
465.0
443.2
659.4
1165,1
139,3
11 L ,8
18,4
251.5
113."
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 *
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
b.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0 *
0,
0.
0.
0 .
0 »
,0
0.
.0
.0
.1
.0
,1
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.
* '">
. L
,0
.0
.0
,0
.0
,0
*•>
.1
.0
,0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.1
.1
,0
'•>
.0
.0
'"1
,0
.1
,0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,0
,0
.0
.1
.0
2.0
.3
* ^
o
.3
,6
,1
. 1
.0
.1
,1
Sweepings &
Grinding s
191.
0.
54.
51 .
1212.
26.
574.
89.
311.
362.
8.
0.
1610.
598.
239.
176.
138.
94.
71.
330,
1759.
656.
176.
95.
132.
a.
21.
8.
153.
1204.
8.
1161.
1150,
14,
2016.
173.
222 .
1621.
414.
342.
14.
265.
377.
8.
90.
169.
357.
45.
871 ,
25,
20194,
3062,
2366.
2254,
3354.
5927,
711.
569.
94,
12^9,
'579.
1-11
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry We.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.HDry Wt.) (
123.
0.
35.
33.
790.
17.
370.
57.
200.
233.
5.
0.
1036.
385.
154.
113.
39.
61,
46.
212.
1132,
423.
113.
61.
85.
5 +
14.
5,
99,
775.
5.
747.
740.
9.
1298.
115.
143.
1044.
267.
542.
9,
171.
243,
5.
58.
109.
230.
29.
561.
16.
90.
0.
25.
24.
570.
12.
270.
42.
146.
170.
4.
0.
757.
282.
112.
93,
65.
44,
33,
155,
828,
309,
83.
45,
62.
4,
10.
4.
72.
567.
4.
546.
541.
7.
948.
84.
105.
763.
195.
396.
7.
125.
177.
4.
42.
30.
168.
2.1.
410.
12.
Hazardous Waste Flammable
[Wet Wt.) (Dry Wt.) Solvents
90.
0.
25.
24.
570.
12.
270.
42.
146.
170.
4.
0.
757.
282.
112.
83.
65.
44.
33.
155.
828.
309.
83.
45.
62,
4.
10.
4.
72.
567.
4.
546.
541.
7.
948.
84.
105.
763.
195.
396.
7 .
125.
177.
4.
42.
80.
168.
21.
410.
12.
57.
0.
16.
15.
360.
8.
171.
27.
92.
108.
o .
0.
478.
178.
71.
52.
41.
28.
21 .
98.
523.
195.
52.
28.
39.
"»
6.
n
46.
358.
o
345.
342.
4.
599.
53.
66.
482.
123.
250.
4,
79,
112,
2 1
27.
50.
106.
13.
259.
7.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
48.3
0.
13.6
12.9
307.0
6.5
145.4
22.6
78.8
91.8
2,0
0.
407.7
151.5
60.4
44.5
35.0
23.9
18.0
S3. 5
445.5
166,2
44,5
24,1
33.4
2.0
5.4
2.0
38.8
305.0
2.0
294.1
291.1
3.6
510.5
45.1
56.3
410.5
105.0
213.2
3.6
67.1
'95.4
2.0
22.7
42. 9
90.4
11.4
220.6
6.2
1 ,6
0,
,4
.4
9.9
t o
4.7
.7
2.5
3.0
,1
0.
13.2
4,9
1,9
1.4
1,1
.8
.6
2.7
14.4
5.4
1.4
.8
1.1
.1
» 2
.1
1.3
9.8
,1
9.5
9.4
.1
16.5
1.5
l.S
13.2
3.4
6.9
.1
° * *"*
3.1
.1
.7
1.4
2.9
.4
7. 1
4 p
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grlndlngs
3.3
0,
.9
.9
21.0
.4
9.9
1 .5
5,4
6.3
.1
0.
27.8
10.3
4.1
3.0
2.4
1.6
1 . 2
5.7
30.4
11.3
3.0
1.6
2.3
.1
.4
.1
2.6
20.8
.1
20,1
19.9
t °
34.8
3,1
3.8
28.0
7 .2
14,6
^ r>
4.6
6.5
, 1
1.5
2.9
6.2
.8
.15.1
.4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
13000.
9500.
9500.
6000.
5114.0
165.0
349.0
0.
1971.
1523.
1451.
2159.
3815.
458.
366.
60.
824.
373,
1440,
1113,
1061,
1578,
2788,
335,
267.
44,
602,
273.
1440.
1113.
1061.
157ET.
2788.
335.
267.
44.
602.
273.
910.
703.
670.
997.
1761 ,
211.
169,
28.
380.
172.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
775
599
570
849
1.500
180
144
23
324
146
.3
.1
.9
.4
.9
.1
.0
.7
.0
-7
25.0
19.3
18.4
27Y4-
48.4
5.8
4.6
,8
10,5
4.7
52
40
39
58
102
12
9
1
T*>
10
. 9
.9
,0
,0
,4
.3
,0
,6
,1
.0
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
1-12
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 335
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Ut.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
(Wet Wt.)
76.
0.
21.
20.
430.
10.
2^7 t
35.
123.
144.
3.
0.
633.
237.
95.
70.
55 *
37.
28.
1.31.
497,
260.
70.
38,
52.
3,
8.
3.
61.
477.
3.
160.
455.
6,
799 t
71.
38.
642,
1 64.
334,
6.
105,
149.
3.
35,
67.
14 L.
10,
345.
10.
Waste
(Dry Wt.)
47.
0.
13.
13.
300.
6.
142.
22 .
77,
90.
O ^
0.
399.
148.
59.
44.
34.
23 .
18.
32.
436.
163.
44.
24.
33.
o ^
5.
'-S
33,
298.
'T
287.
235.
3.
499.
44.
S5.
401.
103,
208.
3.
66.
93.
2 .
-?2 ,
42.
88.
11 .
216.
6.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
38.
0.
11.
10.
240.
5 »
114.
18.
62,
72 .
*•>
0.
319.
119.
47.
35.
27 .
19.
14.
65.
348,
130.
,55.
19.
26 .
2 ,
4,
n ^
30.
239.
T
230.
228 ,
3.
399.
35.
44.
321.
82.
167.
3.
53,
75 ,
n
18.
34.
71.
9 ,
173.
5.
(Dry yt.)
19.
0.
5.
5.
120.
3.
57,
9.
31.
36.
1 .
0.
159,
59.
24.
17.
14,
9.
7.
33.
174.
65,
17.
9,
13,
1.
o
1,
15.
119,
1,
115.
114,
1,
200.
18.
T1
161.
41. ,
83.
1 .
26.
37.
1.
9.
17.
35.
4.
86.
o t
Flammable
Solvents
6.
0.
*"* *
-1 +
41.
1.
19.
3.
10.
12,
0.
0.
54,
20.
8.
6.
5.
3 ,
o
11.
59.
22 .
6.
3.
4.
0.
1.
0.
5.
41.
0.
39.
39.
0.
68,
6.
7.
55.
14.
28,
0.
9.
13.
0.
3.
6.
12.
o
29.
1,
Heavy
Metals
.7
0.
•~>
">
4.7
.1.
•"% •">
.3
1.2
1.4
,0
0,
6.3
2.3
,9
. 7
. b>
,4
.3
L.3
6.9
2.6
,7
.4
.5
.0
,1
.0
.6
4.7
.0
4.5
4.3
.1
7.9
.7
,9
6,3
1 .6
3.3
. 1
1.0
1,5
.0
,4
» 7
1 .4
'T
3.4
. 1
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
3.9
0.
1 .1
1.1
25.1
.5
11,9
1.8
6.4
7.5
* ''*
0.
33.3
J2.4
4."
3.6
2 . 9
2,0
1,5
6.8
36,4
13.6
3,6
2,0
2.7
O
»4
n
3.2
24.9
o
24.0
23,8
.3
41.7
3.7
4.6
33.6
8.6
17. 4
.3
5*5
7.3
")
1.9
3.5
7.4
.9
18.0
. 5
,7
0,
1 2
t 2
4,3
,1
2.0
.3
1 , 1
1.3
.0
0.
5.7
2.1
t 9
.6
* l"j
.3
.3
1 .2
6.3
2.3
.6
,3
.5
.0
, ]
,0
* 5
4,3
.0
4. 1
4. 1
.0
/.2
.6
.3
5,0
1.5
3.0
.0
.9
1.3
.0
.3
.6
1.3
")
3, 1
,1
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grlndings
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
0000 .
5000.
4000.
2000.
680.
79.0
41 S . 0
72,0
1213,
937.
393,
1329.
2348.
282.
225,
37.
507.
230.
753.
586.
558.
830.
1467.
176.
141,
23.
317.
143.
606.
469,
447.
664.
J 174.
141 .
113,
J9.
253.
115,
303,
234.
223.
332.
587,
70.
56 +
9.
127.
57.
103
SO
76
113
200
24
19
3
43
20
12
9
3
13
'IT
2
'•>
5
't
.0
.3
.8
, I
t o
.3
"1
.4
.0
.3
63
49
46
69
122
14
1 L
1
26
12
.4
,0
,7
.4
.7
.7
.8
,9
. 5
.0
10
3
3
12
21
o
~J
4
o
.9
. 4
•9
.0
. 1
. 5
.0
.,5
.6
. 1
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1-13
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — COATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIAMA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.]
123.
0.
35.
33.
730.
17.
370.
57.
200.
233.
5.
0.
1036.
395.
154.
113.
89.
61.
46.
212.
1132.
423.
113.
61.
35.
5.
14.
5,
99.
775.
5 *
747.
740,
9.
1298.
115.
143.
1044.
267.
542.
9.
171.
243.
5.
58.
109,
230.
29,
561.
16.
13000.
1971.
1523,
1451,
2159.
3915.
458.
366.
60.
824,
373,
)(Dry Wt.)
104.
0.
29.
28.
660.
14.
313.
49.
169.
197,
4,
0.
877.
326.
130,
96.
75.
51.
•39.
180,
958,
358.
96.
52.
72.
4.
12.
4.
83.
656.
4,
632.
626.
8.
1098.
97.
121 .
883.
226,
459.
8.
144.
205.
4.
49.
92.
194.
25.
475.
13.
11000.
1663.
1289.
1228.
1827.
3228.
387.
310.
51.
697.
316,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
85.
0.
24,
23,
540.
11,
256,
40,
139.
161.
4.
0.
718.
267,
106.
73.
62.
42.
32.
147.
794.
293 .
78.
42.
59.
4.
9.
4,
68.
537.
4,
517.
512.
6.
898,
79.
99.
722.
185.
375.
6.
118.
168.
4.
40.
75.
159.
20.
388.
11.
9000.
1364.
1054.
1005.
1495,
2641 .
317.
253.
42.
570.
25S.
(Dry Wt ._)
66.
0.
19.
18.
420.
9.
199,
31.
108,
126.
3.
0.
558.
207.
£)3.
61 ,
48.
33.
25.
114.
610.
228 .
61.
33,
46.
3.
7.
3.
53.
417.
3.
402.
398.
5.
699.
62,
77.
562.
144.
292 .
5.
92.
131.
3.
31.
59.
124,
16.
302.
9 t
7000.
1061.
820.
701.
1 L63.
2054.
246.
197.
32.
443.
201.
Flammable
Solvents
37.
0.
10.
10.
233.
5.
110.
17.
60.
70,
~i t
0.
310,
115,
46.
34.
27,
18.
14.
63,
338.
126.
34.
18.
25.
2 .
4.
*"* t
29.
232.
"i (
223.
'-121 .
3.
397,
34.
43.
312.
80.
162.
3.
51.
72.
o t
17.
33.
69.
9 t
167.
5 .
3832.
5S9.
455.
433.
645;
1139.
1 37.
109,
13.
246.
11 L.
Heavy
Metals
6.0
0.
1.7
1.6
38.3
.8
18.1
2.8
9.8
11.4
.3
0.
50.9
18.9
7.5
5.6
4.4
3,0
~3 o
10,4
55.6
20,7
5,6
3.0
4.2
.3
.7
.3
4.8
38.1
.3
36.7
36.3
.4
63.7
5.6
7.0
51 .2
13.1
26.6
.4
S.4
11.9
.3
2.8
5.3
11.3
1.4
27.5
.8
638.0
96.7
74.7
71.2
106.0
1S7.2
22.5
IS.O
3.0
40.4
IB. 3
Acids/Alkali
Oils
19.2
0.
5.4
5. 1
1 22 . 2
2.6
57.9
9.0
31.4
36 , 5
.8
0.
162.3
60.3
24.0
17.7
13.9
9.5
7.1
33.2
177.3
66.2
17.7
9.6
13.3
.8
2.1
.8
15.4
121.4
.8
117.0
115.8
1.4
203.1
17.9
2*"1 * A
163.4
41.3
84,3
1.4
26.7
33,0
,8
9,0
17,1
36.0
4,5
87,3
2.5
2035.0
308.5
238.4
2'77 . i
.538.0
597. 2
71 ,7
57.3
9.4
128.9
5S.4
Solution
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.-
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
Cyanide
.0
0.
.0
,0
o
.0
,1
,0
,1
, I
.0
0.
.3
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
,d
.3
.1
.0
.0
,0
.0
.0
.0
,0
o
.0
/-)
•")
,0
.4
,0
,0
.3
.1
o
,0
. i
.1
.0
.0
,0
.1
..0
o
,0
4,0
.6
.5
.4
.7
1 , J
. 1.
, t
,0
.3
. I
Sweepings &
Grind ings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
o, -
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
-------
SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 355
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
t^BRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
(Wet Wt.)
1162.
0.
328.
310.
7384.
157.
3497.
544.
1895.
2207.
49,
0.
9807,
3645,
1453.
J071 ,
842.
575,
432.
2000,
10715.
3998,
,1070.
579.
804.
48.
130,
49.
934.
7,536 ,
49.
7072.
7002,
35,
I 2278,
1084,
1355,
9874,
2524,
M28.
t->5 ,
! f-, 1 5 ,
2295.
40,
046,
1031,
2175.
274 .
5306.
150,
Waste
1162.
0.
328.
310.
73S4.
157.
3497.
544,
1895.
2207 *
49.
0.
9807.
3645.
1453.
10^1 .
842,
5^5.
432.
2008.
107.15.
3998.
1070.
579,
804.
48.
130.
49.
934.
7336.
49.
7072.
7002,
85,
12278.
1.084.
1355,
9874.
2524,
SI 38.
85,
1615.
2295,
49,
546.
1031 ,
21.75.
274.
5,306.
LT;O.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.) (Dr;
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 .
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
! Wt.)
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0 .
0.
0 ,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
Flammable
Solvents
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0 ,
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
Acids/Alkali
Oils
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0 *
0.
0.
0.
Solution
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
Cyanide
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Sweepings &
Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
123000, 1J3000.
18648.
14408.
13731.
2
-------
APPENDIX J
OFFICE, COMPUTING, AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING (SIC 357)
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION FOR 1975, 1977, AND 1983
BY STATE AND EPA REGION
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.HDry Wt.) (
32.
0.
318.
1083.
6733.
1683.
1591.
6 14.
^62.
59.
0.
0,
1626.
303.
42 .
353,
15L5.
16.
0.
241.
3101 .
637.
2918,
0,
81 .
0.
65.
0,
303.
1277.
212 .
5124.
723.
0,
1219.
6?!i.
m .
737,
0.
257,
125.
IS'?,
L944.
232.
71.
11".
307,
0.
21'',
L21 .
21 .
0.
204.
694.
4352.
1079,
1020.
394.
489.
33.
0.
0.
1042,
515.
27.
T~)O
971 ,
10.
0.
154.
2039.
441 ,
1871 ,
0.
52,
0.
42,
0.
195.
819,
136.
3285.
463.
0.
781,
409,
110.
473.
0,
1.65.
80.
121.
1246.
181.
46,
76,
517.
0,
139,
77,
Hazardous Waste Flammable
Wet Wt.) 1
32.
0.
313.
1083,
6788.
1683.
1591.
614.
762.
59.
0.
0.
1626,
803.
42.
358.
1515.
16.
0.
241.
3181 .
687.
2918.
0,
31.
0,
65.
0,
303,
1277.
212.
3124.
723.
0,
1219.
638.
171 .
737.
0.
257.
125.
189,
1944.
232.
71 .
119.
807.
0.
217,
121.
[Dry Wt . ) Solvents
21.
0.
204.
694.
4352.
1079.
1020,
394.
439.
38.
0.
0.
1042,
515.
27.
229 »
971 .
10.
0.
154.
2039.
441,
1871.
0,
52.
0.
42.
0.
195.
819.
136.
3285.
463.
0.
731.
4O9,
110.
473.
0.
1 65 *
SO.
12L .
1246.
181.
46,
76,
517,
0,
1/9.
77,
7.
0.
71,
243.
1520.
377.
356.
138.
171.
13.
0.
0.
364.
180.
9,
80.
339 .
4.
0.
54.
712,
154.
654,
0,
10.
0,
15.
0.
68,
206.
47,
1148,
162,
0,
273.
143,
33,
165,
0.
57 .
28.
42.
435,
63.
16.
27.
181.
0,
49,
°7 *
Heavy
Metals
1.3
0.
12.4
42,2
264.7
65.6
62, 1
24.0
29.7
2.3
0.
0.
63,4
31.3
1 .6
14.0
59.1
.6
0.
9.4
124.1
26.3
113,3
0.
3.2
0.
2,5
0.
11,8
49.8
8.3
199.3
28.2
0.
47,5
24.9
6,7
23, 7
0,
10.0
4,9
7,4
75.8
11,0
2.8
4,6
31,5
0.
3*5
4.7
Acids/Alkali
Sweepings &
Oils Solution Cyanide
.5
0.
4.9
16.7
104.4
25.9
24.5
9.4
11.7
.9
0.
0.
25.0
12.4
.6
5.5
23 , 3
» "*
0.
3,7
48.9
10,6
44.9
0.
1 .2
0.
1.0
0,
4.7
19.6
3,3
73,8
11.1
0.
18.8
9.3
2.6
11,3
0.
3.9
1 .9
2,9
29, 9
4.3
1. I
1.8
12.4
0.
3.3
1.9
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
•0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Grindings
It.
0.
112.
382,
2397.
594.
562.
217.
269.
21.
0.
0.
574.
234,
15.
126.
535,
6,
0.
85.
1123.
243.
1030.
0.
29 .
0.
23.
0,
107,
451,
75.
1309.
255.
0.
430.
225.
60.
260.
0.
9t .
44,
67.
686.
99.
25.
42.
285.
0.
77.
43.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
39000,
25000.
39000.
25000.
1521,0
600.0
5L63.
6402,
mi.
3536-
7471.
•? L I 2 ,
546.
238 1 ,
7371,
BO ',
3310,
4] 04.
1 097 ,
2?67,
4 789 ,
1995.
350,
152ft.
5046.
517.
3163.
6402,
1711,
3536,
7471 ,
31 L2,
546,
23S1 ,
7H71 ,
907 ,
-5310,
4104.
1097,
2267,
4/D9,
1995,
350.
L5'J6.
5046,
517,
1156.
1434.
383 .
792.
1 673,
697,
122,
573.
1"'6J3.
I8U
201
249
66
1.37
291
121
21
92
30-7
3J
.4
,7
,7
t 9
,4
,4
.3
,9
.0
* 5
/9.4
93.5
26.3
54 . 4
114,9
47,9
3,4
36 , 6
L2L.1
J2.4
0.
0.
0,
o-.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
13769.
1823,
2260.
604.
1249,
2630.
1099,
193.
9-1J ,
2''79 ,
235.
J-l
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
Hazardous Waste Flammable
(Wet Wt.)(Dry wt.) (Wet Wt.)
wJ *
0.
51,
172.
1079.
268.
253.
98.
121.
9,
0,
0,
259,
128.
7.
57.
241.
3.
0.
38.
506.
109.
464,
0.
13.
0.
10,
0.
48,
203,
34.
815,
115.
0,
194,
101,
27,
117,
0.
4t ,
20.
30.
309.
45.
11,
19.
]28,
0.
34,
19,
6200.
821.
1018.
°7'") .
562.
1188.
495.
87,
379,
1251.
128.
o ^
0.
20.
69.
432.
107.
101.
39.
48.
4.
0.
0.
103,
51,
3.
23,
96,
I.
0.
15,
202,
44,
186.
0,
5 *
0,
4,
0,
19,
81.
13.
3:>6.
46.
0.
78.
41.
11 .
47.
0.
16.
8,
12,
124,
(.3.
5 »
8,
51,
0.
14.
•U,
2480,
328.
407.
109.
225.
475.
19R,
35.
151 .
50.1 .
51,
5.
0.
51.
172,
1079.
268.
253.
98.
121.
9.
0.
0,
259.
128.
7.
57.
241.
3.
0.
38.
506,
109.
464.
0,
13,
0.
10.
0.
48.
203.
34.
815.
115.
0.
194.
101 .
27,
117.
0.
41.
20.
30,
309.
45.
11.
19,
128.
0.
34.
19.
6200.
821.
1018.
ly*
562.
1108.
495 .
87,
379.
1251 .
128.
(Dry Wt.) Solvents
o t
•0.
20.
69.
432.
107.
101.
39.
48.
4.
0.
0.
103.
51.
3.
23.
96.
1.
0.
15.
202.
44.
186.
0.
b »
0.
4,
0.
19,
81.
13.
326.
46.
0.
78.
41.
J 1.
47,
0.
16.
8.
12.
124.
18,
5 »
B.
5.1 .
0,
L4.
8.
2480.
328.
407.
109.
225 ,
4/5,
198,
35.
I'Jl ,
501,
51.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
Heavy
Metala
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0*
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
1,7
0.
17.2
58,7
368.0
91,2
86,3
33.3
41,3
3.2
0.
0,
88,1
43.5
2.3
19.4
32,1
,9
0.
13.0
172.4
37.3
158,2
0.
4.4
0,
3,5
0*
16.5
69.2
11.5
277.8
" 39,2
0,
66.1
34.6
9.3
40.0
0.
13.9
6,8
10.2
105.4
15.3
3.9
6.5
43.7
0.
J 1,8
6.G
2114.0
279.9
347.0
92.7
191,7
405.0
168,7
29.6
129, 1
426.7
43.7
.1
0.
1,3
4.6
28.7
7.1
6.7
2.6
3.2
» *"*
0.
0.
6.9
3.4
,2
1,5
6.4
. 1
0.
1,0
13.5
2,9
12,3
0.
,3
0.
,3
0,
1.3
5.4
,9
21,7
3,1
0.
5,2
2.7
,7
3,1
0.
l.l
» 5
.3
8.2
1.2
.3
.5
3.4
0,
,9
•,5
165.0
21.8
27. L
7,2
15.0
31.6
13,2
2.3
1 0 , 1
33 , 3
3.4
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindlngs
,0
0.
.5
1.6
10.1
2.5
2.4
.9
1 .1
.1
0.
0.
2. 4
1.2
.1
.5
2.3
.0
0,
,4
4,7
1,0
4,3
0,
,1
0,
, 1.
0,
.5
1,9
,3
7.6
1.1
0,
1.8
.9
.3
1 .1
0.
.4
^
.3
2,9
. 4
. 1
, 2
1 .2
0.
.3
+ "I
58.0
7.7
9,5
2.CJ
5,3
11.1
4,6
,3
3 , 5
11.7
1 , 2
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
,-;, ,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
J-2
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK-
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
18.
0.
179.
611.
3829.
949.
898.
346.
430.
33.
0.
0,
937.
453.
24,
202,
(355.
9.
0,
L3o.
1794.
388.
1.646.
0.
46.
0.
37,
0.
171.
720.
120.
2R91.
40S.
0.
688.
360.
96 .
416.
0.
145.
70.
106.
1097.
159,
40.
67.
455.
0.
1 '~''~> »
60.
22000.
2913.
36 Li.
"65.
1"95.
4214.
1 755 .
308.
1343.
4440.
4S5.
(Dry Wt.)
7.
0.
68.
233.
1462.
362.
343.
132.
164.
13.
0.
0.
350.
173.
9.
77.
326.
3.
0,
52.
685.
148.
629.
0.
17.
0.
14.
0.
65.
275.
46.
1104.
156.
0 .
263.
137,
37.
159.
0.
55,
27.
41 .
419.
61 .
15.
26.
174,
0,
47.
26,
8400.
1112.
1379,
368.
762.
1609.
670.
118.
513.
[695.
1/4.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
18.
0.
179.
611.
3829.
949.
898.
346.
430.
33.
0,
0.
917.
'i53.
24.
202 .
855.
9.
0.
136.
1794.
388.
1646.
0.
46.
0,
37.
0.
171.
720,
L20.
2891 ,
408,
0.
688,
360,
96.
416.
0,
145.
70.
106,
1097,
159.
40,
67.
455.
0.
122.
63,
22000.
29 13.
361 1.
965.
1995.
4214.
1 755 .
308 .
1343.
4440.
)o5 ,
(Dry Wt.)
7.
0.
68.
233.
1462.
362.
343.
132.
164,
13.
0.
0 ,
350.
173,
9 ,
77.
326,
3,
0.
52,
685.
148.
629.
0.
17.
0,
14,
0 ,
65 .
275 .
46.
1104.
1 56.
0.
263.
137.
37,
159,
0,
Lj5 *
27.
4L .
419,
61 ,
15.
26.
174.
0,
47.
26.
3400.
1 112.
1379.
3 08 .
762.
J609.
670.
118,
513.
1695.
174.
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
3.
0.
32.
108.
676.
168.
158.
61.
76.
6.
0,
0,
162.
80.
4,
36.
151.
o
0.
24 .
317.
68.
290.
0.
8.
0.
6,
0.
30.
127.
21.
510.
"7O
0.
121.
64.
17.
73.
0.
26.
12.
19.
J 93 .
28.
7.
12.
80.
0.
TT
12 .
3882.
514.
637.
170.
352.
744.
310.
54.
237,
784,
00.
Metals
.1
0.
1.4
4.8
29.9
7.4
7.0
2.7
3.4
.3
0.
0.
7 .2
3.5
t 2
1 ,6
6.7
. 1
0.
1. 1
14,0
3.0
12.9
0.
.4
0.
,3
0.
1.3
5.6
.9
22.6
3.2
0.
5.4
2.3
,8
3,3
0.
1 . 1
.6
.8
8.6
1.2
.3
.5
3.6
0,
1 .0
» 5
172. 0
22.8
28.2
7.5
15.6
32.9
13.7
2. 4
10.5
34,7
3.6
Acids/Alkali
Oils
.1
0,
1.4
4.7
29.6
7.3
6.9
2.7
3.3
.3
0.
0,
7,1
3,5
1 2
1.6
6.6
,1
0,
1 .0
13,9
3.0
12,7
0.
.4
0.
.3
0.
1.3
5.6
.9
22.3
3.2
0.
5 , 3
2,8
,7
3.2
0.
1.1
* 5
.8
8.5
1 . 2
.3
» 5
3.5
0.
,9
. 5
170.0
22,5
27.9
7.5
15.4
32.6
13.6
2.4
10.4
34.3
3.5
Solution
. 2
0.
1.9
6.3
39.7
9.8
9.3
3.6
4.5
* 3
0.
0.
O t '•"
4,7
. 2
2. J
8.9
, 1
0.
1 , 4
18,6
4.0
17,1
0.
.5
0.
. 4
0.
1.8
7,5
1.2
30.0
4.2
0,
7. 1
3,7
1 .0
4.3
0,
1 ,5
.7
1 . 1
11.4
1.6
.4
,7
4,7
0.
1 .3
,7
228.0
30.2
37,4
10.0
20.-?
43.7
J. 3 , 2
3.2
13.9
46.0
4,7
Sweepings &
Cyanide
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0 ,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
o-.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0 ,
Grind ings
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
J-3
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — COATING
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
•II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
3.
0.
29.
97.
609.
151.
143.
55.
68.
5 *
0.
0.
146.
72 «
4.
32,
136.
1.
0.
22 .
235.
62.
262.
0.
7.
0.
6.
0.
27 .
115.
19.
460.
65 *
0.
109.
57.
15.
66 .
0.
23.
11.
17.
174.
25 .
6.
11.
72.
0.
19.
ii.
3500 .
463,
575.
154.
317,
670.
279.
49.
214,
706.
72.
l(Dry Wt.)
O
0.
21 .
72.
453.
112,
106.
41.
51.
4.
0.
0.
ioa.
54.
3 *
24.
101.
1 ,
0.
16.
^ 1 "* »
46.
195.
0,
5 *
0.
4,
0.
20.
85.
14.
342.
48.
0.
81.
43.
11.
49,
0.
17.
8.
13.
130.
19.
5.
a.
54.
0.
14.
8.
2600,
344.
427.
114.
236.
498,
207,
36.
159,
525.
54.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
3.
0.
29.
97.
609.
151.
143.
55,
68.
5.
0.
0.
146,
72.
4.
32.
136.
1.
0.
22 »
285.
62.
262.
0.
7,
0.
6.
0.
27.
115.
19.
460.
65.
0.
109.
57.
15.
66.
0.
23.
11.
17.
174.
25.
6.
11.
72.
0.
19,
11.
3500.
463.
575.
154.
317.
670.
279.
49.
214.
706 .
~f~)
(Pry Wt.)
2 .
0.
21.
72.
453.
112.
106.
41.
51.
4.
0.
0.
108.
54.
3,
24 ,
101 .
1 .
0.
16.
212 *
46.
195.
0.
5.
0.
4.
0.
20.
85.
14.
342.
48.
0,
81.
43.
11.
49.
0.
17.
S.
13.
130.
19.
5 *
8.
54.
0.
14.
8.
2600.
344.
427.
114.
236.
498.
207.
36.
159.
525.
54.
Flammable
Solvents
9 t
0.
16.
54,
338.
84.
79.
31.
38.
3.
0.
0.
81.
40.
'•) ^
IS.
75.
1.
0.
12.
158.
34.
145.
0.
4.
0.
3.
0.
15.
64.
11.
255.
36.
0.
61.
32.
9.
37.
0,
13.
6.
9.
97,
14.
4.
6.
40.
0.
11.
6.
1941.
257.
319.
85.
176.
372.
155.
27.
119.
392.
40.
Heavy
Metals
* T>
0.^
O •-)
7\1
47.7
11.8
11.2
4.3
5.4
.4
0.
0.
11.4
5.6
,3
2.5
10.6
.1
0.
1.7
22,3
4.8
20.5
0.
,6
0.
.5
0.
2.1
9.0
1,5
36.0
5,1
0.
8.6
4.5
1.2
5.2
0.
1.8
.9
1.3
13.7
2.0
.5
,8
5.7
0.
1.5
.8
274.0
36,3
45,0
12.0
24.8
52.5
21.9
3.8
16,7
55.3
5. 7
Acids/Alkali
Oils
.0
0.
.0
.1
,9
n
* "*
.1
.1
.0
0.
0.
. 2
.1
,0
.0
* "*
.0
0.
.0
.4
.1
.4
0.
.0
0.
.0
0.
.0
1 2
.0
.7
,1
0.
1 2
.1
.0
. ]
0.
.0
.0
.0
* '~*
.0
.0
.0
. 1
0.
.0
.0
5.0
.7
.8
^ 2
. 5
1.0
,4
. I
.3
1.0
,1
Solution
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
Cyanide
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Q.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Sweepings 4
Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
J-4
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1975 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOW
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
20.
0.
196,
667.
4177.
1 036 .
979.
378.
469.
36 *
0,
0.
J001.
494 ,
26 •
220.
932.
10.
0.
148.
1958.
423.
1796.
0.
50.
0.
40.
0.
187.
786,
t30,
U53.
445.
0,
''50.
3<->3.
105,
454,
0.
158.
-f -<
J to,
U96,
173.
44.
73.
496.
'"* *
134.
74 >
24000.
31/7.
3939.
1053.
21/6.
159U.
1913,
336.
1465.
'•1844.
496.
Hazardous
i (Dry Wt . ) (Wet Wt.) (1
20.
0.
196.
667.
4177.
1036,
979.
378.
469.
36 .
0.
0.
1001 .
494.
26 .
220.
932.
10.
0.
148.
195ti.
423,
1796.
0.
50.
0.
40,
0.
107.
786.
J30.
3153.
445.
0.
750.
393.
105.
454.
0.
158.
77.
116.
1196.
173.
44.
73.
496,
0.
134,
74.
24000,
3177,
3939.
1053,
2176.
4098,
1915,
336,
1465.
4844,
496.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0 ,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0 ,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0 ,
0.
Waste Flammable
Dry Wt.) Solvents
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0;
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 *
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
&.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindines
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o,-
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
J-5
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND. ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.:
32.
0.
318.
1083.
6788.
1683,
J591,
614.
762,
59 •
0,
0
1626.
803.
42.
3t>8.
LSI 5.
16.
0.
241.
3181.
687.
2918,
0.
01 .
0.
65.
0,
303.
1277,
O t O
51.24,
7 2 "5.
0,
1219,
63$,
17! ,
737-
0,
2 5 7 ,
125 -
J89,
J 944,
292 ,
71,
1.1°.
807
0 *
2 1 7 ,
l-H,
39000 ,
5J.ft3,
6402,
171.1,
3536,
74 7i,
3112,
'346,
23-<31 ,
70/1.
0'),',
I (Dry Wt . )
21,
0,
204,
694.
4352.
1079.
1020.
394.
489.
38.
0,
0.
1042,
515,
27.
T">9 t
97 L .
10.
0.
154.
2039,
441 ,
1371,
0.
i= ">
0,
4?,
0.
195,
8 I*.
136,
3285.
463,
0,
781 ,
409,
1.10.
473.
0.
1 .55.
80 .
J?l ,
1246,
181 ,
46,
76.
SI"7.
0.
13°.
77,
25000 .
5310.
4104,
1097,
2267,
4709,
1995,
3roO
1526.
'JO 46.
5 1 -' ,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt,
32.
0.
318.
1083.
6788.
1683.
1591.
614,
762.
59.
0.
0,
1626.
803.
42,
350.
1515.
16.
0.
241 ,
3181,
637.
2918.
0.
81.
0.
65,
0.
303,
1277,
212.
5124.
723.
0.
1219.
638,
171,
737.
0.
2Lv7,
125.
189-
1944.
282 *
71.
119.
807,
0.
217.
121 .
39000,
G163.
6402,
1.711,
3536 ,
7471 ,
3112,
'516.
2301 ,
7f!7l .
no-7.
.) (Pry Wt.)
21.
0.
204.
694,
4352.
1079.
1020.
394.
489.
38.
0.
0.
1042.
515.
27.
T-)Q ,
971.
10.
0.
154.
2039.
441.
1871,
0.
52.
0,
42,
0.
195.
819.
136,
3285.
463.
0.
78J ,
409,
110.
473.
0.
165.
80.
121 ,
1246,
181.
46.
76.
517.
0.
139,
77.
2GOOO
,5310,
4 I 04,
1097,
°267 ,
47U9,
1V95,
3I"0 .
1 b"26 ,
50 4f. ,
51 7 .
Flammable Heavy
Solvents
7.
0.
71.
243.
1520.
377.
356.
138.
171 .
13.
0.
0,
364,
ISO.
9.
80.
339.
4.
0.
54.
712.
154.
o54 .
0.
1.8.
0.
15.
0,
68.
286 ,
47.
1 148,
162.
0,
273,
143.
30.
16:;.
o ,
57,
28,
42,
435 ,
63,
16,
27.
1SL,
0,
49,
27.
8735,
1 1 56 ,
1434,
383,
792
1673,
697.
122,
533,
176J,
KM ,
Metals
1.3
0.
12.4
42. 2
264.7
65.6
62.1
24,0
29.7
2.3
0.
0.
63.4
31 ,3
1.6
14.0
39.1
.6
0,
9.4
124,1
26. 3
113,8
0.
3,2
0,
2.5
0.
11,8
49.8
8.3
199,8
28.2
0.
47,5
24,9
6.7
28.7
0,
10.0
4,9
7,4
75,3
11.0
2,0
4.6
31.5
0.
8,5
4, 7
1521 ,0
20J , 4
249.7
66,7
137.9
291 ,4
121-4
21,3
^2,9
,30~7-Q
31 ,'j
Acids/Alkali
Oils
* 5
0.
4.9
16,7
104,4
25.9
24,5
9,4
11,7
,9
0,
0,
25.0
12.4
,6
5.5
23.3
D
0.
3.7
48.9
10.6
44.9
0.
1 .2
0,
1.0
0,
4.7
19.6
3.3
78.8
11.1
0.
18.8
9,8
2,6
11,3
0.
3,9
1 ,9
2.9
29.9
4,3
1.1
US
12,4
0,
3,3
J -9
600,0
79,4
98.5
26.3
54,4
114,9
47, <5
0. 4
36 , 6
121-1
12,4
Solution
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
-0">
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
Cyanide
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
Sweepings &
Grinding s
11.
0,
112.
382.
2397.
594.
562.
217.
269.
21.
0.
0.
574.
284.
15.
126.
535,
6.
0.
85.
1123.
243.
1030.
0.
29,
0.
23,
0.'
107.
451.
75.
1809.
255.
0.
430.
225,
60.
260,
0.
91.
44,
67.
686.
99.
25.
42.
285,
0,
77 ,
43.
13769.
1823,
2260,
604.
1243,
2630.
1099,
1
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTIHG AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt.HDry Wt.)
3.
0.
51.
172.
1079.
268.
253.
"8.
121.
9.
0,
0.
259.
L28.
7 ^
57.
241.
3.
0.
38 ,
506,
109,
4o4.
0.
13.
0.
10.
0.
48.
203.
34.
815.
115.
0.
194,
101 .
1-7 ^
117.
0.
41.
20 ,
30.
309 ,
45.
11 .
19,
128,
0,
34,
1.9.
1
0.
20,
69.
432.
107.
101.
39.
43.
4.
0,
0.
103.
51.
3.
23,
96.
1 .
0.
15.
202 .
44.
186.
0.
5,
0.
4.
0,
19.
81.
13,
326.
46.
0.
78.
41,
1 1..
47.
0.
16.
a.
12,
124.
18,
vj *
8.
51.
0.
1.4,
8.
Hazardous Waste Flammable
(Wet Wt.)
a.
0.
51.
172,
1079.
268.
253.
98.
121.
9.
0.
0.
259.
128.
7,
57,
241 ,
3.
0.
38.
506.
109.
464,
0.
13,
0.
10.
0,
48.
203.
34.
815.
115,
0.
194.
101.
27 .
117,
0.
41.
20.
30.
309,
45,
11,
L9.
128,
0.
34,
19.
(Dry Wt.) Solvents
i
0.
20.
69.
432.
107.
101.
39.
48.
4.
0.
0.
103.
51.
3.
23.
96.
1.
0,
15.
202.
44.
186.
0.
5.
0,
4.
0.
19,
81.
13.
526,
46,
0.
78.
41.
LI.
47,
0.
16.
8,
12 ,
124.
18.
5.
8.
51.
0,
14.
8.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0-
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
1.7
0.
17.2
58.7
368.0
91.2
86.3
33.3
41.3
3. 2
0,
0.
88.1
43.5
2,3
19.4
82. 1
.9
0.
13.0
172.4
37,3
158.2
0,
4.4
0.
3.5
0.
16.5
69.2
1.1.5
277.3
39.2
0.
66.1
34.6
9,3
40.0
0.
13.9
6.8
10.2
105.4
15,3
3.9
6.5
43.7
0.
11,8
6.5
.1
0.
1,3
4.6
28.7
7.1
6.7
2.6
3.2
">
0.
0.
6.9
3.4
* 2
1,5
6.4
.1
0.
1 .0
13.5
2.9
12.3
0.
+ 3
0.
,3
0.
I .3
5.4
.9
21.7
3. I
0.
5,2
2 . 7
,7
3.1
0.
1,1
tr
* \J
.8
8,2
1.2
.3
cr
* vj
3.4
0.
.9
. 5
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindings
.0
0.
.5
1.6
10.1
2.5
2.4
.9
1.1
.1
0.
0.
2.4
1.2
.1
* 5
2,3
.0
0. '
.4
4.7
1.0
4.3
0.
.1
0.
.1
0.
. 5
1 .9
,3
7.6
1.1
0.
1.8
,9
.3
1,1
0.
.4
» '^
.3
2,9
.4
.1
1 2
1.2
0,
.3
1
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
6200.
2480.
6200,
2480.
2114.0
165.0
38.0
0.
821,
1018.
T71 t
562 .
1138.
495.
87,
37«
1251 .
128.
328.
407,
109.
Tier
i. V- O 9
475,
198.
?U t
1 ! j 1 ,
50 t ,
r'l .
821 ,
10L8.
*"* y* +
562.
1180.
495 ,
8~> ,
379.
1251 .
128.
323.
407.
109,
225 ,
47?,.
190.
35.
15 L,
501.
H] .
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
279,9
347,0
92.7
191.7
405.0
168.7
29,6
129, L
426. 7
43.7
21.0
27. L
7.2
15,0
31,6
13,2
2.3
10,1
33.3
3.4
7,7
9,5
2.5
5.3
13 , t
4,6
,8
3,5
11.7
I .2
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0-
J-7
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.:
18.
0,
179.
611.
382".
94",
898.
344.
430,
33 .
0-
0,
"17,
453.
24.
202,
8rri=T
>J J .
9,
0.
136,
1794,
330.
1,646.
0.
46.
0.
37.
0,
171.
720.
120.
2891.
403.
0,
683,
,560.
94 ,
416,
0.
145.
70,
106.
J097.
159.
40.
67.
4-53.
0,
122,
68.
22000 .
2913.
361 1.
965,
!<•"•> 5,
4214,
J7S~,
308.
[;543.
4440 ,
455.
KDry Wt.:
7.
0.
68.
233.
1462.
362.
343.
132,
164,
13.
0.
0,
350.
173.
9.
77,
326.
3.
0.
52,
685.
148.
62",
0,
17.
0.
14,
0.
65,
275.
46.
1 1 04 .
156.
0,
263,
137,
37.
15".
0.
55.
27.
41 .
4J9,
61.
15.
26.
174.
0.
47.
26.
8400.
J 1 12.
1379.
368.
762.
1609.
670.
118.
513.
Ic^S.
171.
Hazardous Waste
> (Wet Wt.)
18.
0.
179.
611,
3829,
949,
898.
346.
430.
33,
0,
0,
917,
453,
24,
202,
855,
9.
0,
136,
1794,
388.
1646,
0,
46,
0,
37.
0,
171,
720,
120,
2891.
408,
0.
688.
360.
96.
416.
0.
145.
70,
106.
1097.
159,
40.
67.
455.
0.
122 ,
68,
22000,
2913,
3611.
965.
lr/'95.
1214,
•755.
308.
1343,
4440,
455,
1 (Dry Wt.:
7.
0.
68.
233.
1462.
362.
343.
132.
164.
13.
0.
0.
350,
173.
9.
77.
326.
3.
0,
52.
685.
148.
629.
0.
17.
0,
14,
0.
65.
275.
46.
1104.
156.
0.
263.
137.
37.
159.
0.
55 *
27.
41.
419.
61.
15.
26.
174.
0.
47.
26.
8400.
1112.
1379.
368.
762.
1609,
670.
1.13.
513.
1695.
J74.
Flammable Heavy
) Solvents
3.
0.
32.
108.
676.
168.
158.
61.
76.
6.
0.
0.
162.
80.
4.
36.
151.
rt
0.
24,
3f7.
68.
290.
0.
8.
0,
6,
0.
30,
127,
21,
510,
72.
0.
121,
64,
17.
73.
0.
26.
12.
19,
193.
28,
7,
12.
90.
0.
r1'~) ^
12.
3S32.
514.
637.
170,
352.
744.
310.
54.
237,
784,
30.
Metals
.1
0.
1.4
4.8
29.9
7,4
7.0
2,7
3,4
.3
0.
0.
7.2
3.5
.2
1.6
6.7
.1
0,
1.1
14,0
3.0
12 . Q
0,
.4
0,
.3
0,
1.3
5.6
.9
22.6
3.2
0,
5.4
2.3
.8
3.3
0.
1.1
.6
,8
8.6
1.2
,3
.5
3,6
0,
1 .0
.5
172,0
~)o q
28,2
7.5
15.6
32 a 9
13,7
2.4
10.5
'54,7
3,6
Acids /Alkali
Oils
.1
0.
1.4
4.7
29.6
7.3
6.9
2.7
3.3
.3
0.
0.
7.1
3.5
.2
1.6
6.6
,1
0.
1.0
13.9
3.0
12,7
0,
.4
0.
.3
0.
1.3
5*6
.9
22.3
3.2
0.
5.3
2,8
.7
3.2
0.
1 . 1
. 5
.8
8.5
1.2
.3
.5
3.5
0.
,9
. 5
170,0
22.5
27.'?
7.5
15.4-
32.6
J 3 . 6
2 . 4
10.4
34,3
3.5
Solution
1 2
0.
1.9
6.3
39.7
9.8
9.3
3.6
4.5
,3
0.
0.
9.5
4.7
* 2
2. 1
8.9
.1
0.
1 .4
18.6
4 ,0
17. L
0,
.5
0.
,4
0.
1,8
7.5
1,2
30,0
4.2
0,
7.1
3.7
1.0
4,3
0,
1,5
,7
1 , t
11,4
1,6
. 4
, 7
4,7
0,
1 . 3
. 7
228.0
30.2
37.4
10, 0
20-.-7-
43,7
10,2
3,2
13,9
4i.O
4.7
Sweep ins s &
Cyanide
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 ,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
J-8
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — COATING
1977 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
Total Waste Hazardous Waste Flammable Heavy
State Region (Wet Wt.XDry Wt.) (Wet Wt.) (Dry Wt.) Solvents Metals
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
HI
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
3.
0.
29.
97.
609.
151 .
143.
55.
68,
5,
0.
0,
146.
72.
4,
32,
136.
L ,
0,
22 ,
285,
o2.
262,
0.
7,
0,
6.
0.
27.
L15.
19,
460-
o5.
0,
J 09 .
5 7 *
15.
66.
0.
23,
1 1 .
17.
174,
25.
6.
1.1.
72.
0,
19.
11.
2.
0.
21 .
72.
453.
112.
106.
41 .
51.
4.
0.
0.
10(3.
54.
3.
24,
101.
1 .
0,
16.
212.
46.
195,
0.
5,
0.
4.
0.
20.
85.
14.
342.
48.
0.
81 ,
43,
11 .
49,
0,
17,
8.
13.
130.
19.
5 .
8.
54.
0.
J 4.
8.
3.
0.
29 .
97.
609.
151.
143.
55.
68.
5 *
0.
0.
146.
72 .
4,
32.
136.
L .
0.
22 *
205 .
62.
262.
0.
7.
0.
6.
0.
27.
115.
19.
460.
65.
0.
109.
57 .
15.
66.
0.
23.
11 ,
J7.
174.
25.
6.
11.
72.
0.
19,
1 1 ,
2 ,
0.
21.
72.
453.
112.
106.
41 .
51 .
4,
0.
0.
108.
54,
3.
24,
101,
1 ,
0.
16.
2L2,
46,
195,
0.
5.
0.
4.
0.
20.
85.
14.
342.
48,
0,
81 .
43.
1 t .
4V.
0.
17,
8,
13.
130.
19,
5.
8.
54.
0.
1 4.
8.
2 ,
0.
16.
54.
338.
84.
79.
31.
38.
3,
0.
0,
81 .
40.
2,
13.
75.
t .
0.
1.2.
150.
34.
145.
0.
4.
0.
3.
0,
15.
64.
11 .
255 .
36.
0,
61.
32 .
9,
37.
0.
13.
6.
9.
97.
14.
4.
6.
40.
0.
11.
6.
>2
0.
"> O
7.6
47. 7
11.8
11.2
4.3
5.4
,4
0,
0.
11.4
5. 6
,3
2. . 5
10,6
,1
0.
1,7
22.3
4.8
20,5
0.
.6
0.
.5
0.
2 , i
9.0
1.5
36.0
5.1
0.
8.6
4.5
1 .2
5*2
0.
1 .8
.9
1,3
13,7
2.0
,5
.8
5.7
0.
1 .5
.8
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution £
.0
0,
.0
.1
,9
o
,2
,1
.1
,0
0,
0.
. 2
.1
-.0
.0
.2
.0
0.
.0
.4
.1
.4
0.
.0
0.
.0
0.
.0
. 2
,0
.7
.1
0.
.2
.1
,0
,1
0.
.0
.0
,0
,2
,0
.0
.0
.1
0.
,0
,0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
Sweepings &
yanide Grlndlngs
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
3500.
2600.
3500,
2600.
194.1,
274.0
.0
463.
575.
154.
317,
670.
27°.
49.
214,
706 .
72 .
J44,
427.
114.
236.
490,
207,
36.
159.
525.
54,
463,
575,
154.
3J7.
6/0,
279,
49.
214,
706.
72 .
344.
427.
114.
236 ,
498.
207.
36.
159.
525,
54,
257.
319.
85.
174 .
372,
15v' ,
27,
119,
392.
40,
36
45
12
24
52
21
3
16
Li5
5
.3
,0
,0
,8
, 5
.9
.8
.7
» -3
.7
.7
.8
* 2
.5
1,0
.4
. 1
• 3
1.0
.1
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
J-9
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1977 State and EFA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
WINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.XDry Wt.) (ft
18.
0.
J79.
61. I ,
3829.
949.
098,
346.
4 "50.
33.
0,
0,
917.
453,
24.
CO 2 ,
855.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
o.-
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0 ,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
J-10
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — MACHINE SHOP
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt.XDry Wt.)
72.
0.
709.
2416.
15143,
3754,
3550 .
1370.
1 700 .
131 .
0.
0.
3620,
1 7°2 ,
93.
790.
3380.
35.
0,
537.
7096,
1533,
6510.
0.
10 L.
0,
1 45 ,
0.
677,
2849,
473.
1 1431 .
1612.
0.
2719,
1423.
581.
1644,
0.
573.
2/8,
421.
4336,
623.
159.
266.
1300.
0,
4(34,
270,
87000,
11513,
14200,
3017,
'338 ,
1 6666,
6942,
L2J8,
'",31?,
1 7559,
1.800.
60.
0.
595.
2027.
12706.
3150.
2979.
1150.
1427.
1 10.
0.
0.
3044 ,
1503.
70.
670,
2036.
29.
O.
450.
5954.
1287.
5463.
0.
152.
0.
122.
0.
568.
2391.
397.
9592.
1353.
0,
2282 ,
1194,
320.
1390,
0.
480.
234.
3G3,
3639,
527.
134.
223,
J 5 1 0 ,
0.
406.
226,
.'3000,
9665.
J J982.
3202 ,
6619,
13984,
5825.
L022,
4457 ,
14734.
1510.
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
60.
0.
595.
2027.
12706.
3150.
2979.
1150.
\ 427.
110.
0.
0.
3044.
1503.
78,
670,
2836.
29,
0.
450.
5954,
1287.
5463.
0,
152.
0,
122.
0.
568.
2391.
397.
9592,
1353.
0.
2282 ,
1194.
320.
1300.
0.
480,
234.
353 .
3639,
527.
134.
223.
1510.
0.
406.
226.
73000.
9665,
1 1932,
3202.
6619,
13984,
5825,
1 022.
4457,
14734,
1510.
(Dry Wt.)
49.
0.
481 .
1639.
10270.
2546,
2408.
929.
1153.
89,
0,
0.
2460.
1215.
63,
541.
2292 .
24.
0 .
364.
4312,
1040.
4415,
0.
123.
0.
98.
0,
459.
1932.
321.
7702.
1093.
0.
1844.
965.
258.
1115.
0.
388.
139.
286.
2941.
426.
108.
100.
122.1 ,
0,
328.
103,
59000.
7811 ,
9684,
2538,
5349,
1 1302,
4708.
026,
3602.
J 1908,
1221,
Flammable
Solvents
7.
0.
71.
243.
1520.
377.
356.
138.
171.
13.
0.
0.
364,
ISO.
9.
30,
339.
4.
0.
54,
712,
154.
654.
0.
18.
0.
15.
0.
68.
286.
47.
1148.
162.
0.
273,
143.
38.
165.
0.
57,
28,
42,
435.
63.
16,
27.
181 ,
0.
49.
2^.
8735.
1 156.
1434,
383.
7Q2.
1673.
697.
122,
533,
I "' 6 3 .
181.
Heavy
Metals
1.4
0.
13.5
46.1
289.1
71.7
67.8
26.2
32.5
2.5
0.
0.
69.3
34.2
1 .8
15.2
64.5
.7
0.
10.2
135.5
29.3
124.3
0.
3.5
0.
2.3
0.
12.9
54.4
9.0
2JS.2
30.8
0.
51,9
27 > 2
7.3
31 ,4
0.
10.9
5.3
3.0
82.8
12,0
3.0
5,1
34.4
0.
9,2
5. 1
1661.0
219,9
272.6
72 .9
150.6
318.2
132 ,5
23, 2
101 ,4
335 ,2
34.4
Acids /Alkali
Oils Solution
5,8
0.
57.1
194.5
1218,9
302.2
285.8
110,3
136.9
10.5
0.
0.
292.0
144,2
7.5
64.3
272.0
2.8
0.
43.2
571.2
123.4
524,0
0,
14,6
0 ,
11.7
0.
54.5
229.3
38.1
920.1
129,8
0.
218.9
114.6
30,7
132,4
0.
46. 1
22 . 4
33,9
349,1
50.6
12.8
21.4
144,9
0,
39,0
21,7
7003,0
927, ]
1 149.5
307,2
635.0
1341.5
558,8
98,0
427,6
1413,4
144.9
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0 >
Sweepings &
Cyanide
.0
0.
.0
.1
.7
.2
to
. 1
.1
.0
0.
0.
.1
.0
.0
.0
0 .
• 0
.3
.1
,3
0 ,
, 0
0 .
.0
0.
.0
.1
.0
. 5
. 1
0.
.1
. 1
.0
. 1
0 .
.0
.0
.0
^ 2
,0
,0
,0
, J
0,
.0
.0
4,0
» O
* 7
"T
.4
.0
,3
,1
.0
,1
Grindings
11.
0.
112.
382.
2397.
594.
562.
217.
269.
21 .
0.
0.
574.
284.
15.
126.
535.
6.
0 .
85.
1123.
243,
1030.
0.
29.
0 .
23.
0.
107.
451 ,
75.
1309.
255.
0.
430.
225 .
60.
260.
0.
91 .
44.
67.
686.
99.
25.
42.
285,
0,
77,
43,
13769,
1823.
2260.
604.
12*13,
2638,
1099.
193.
84 L.
2779.
285,
J-ll
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — HEAT TREATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt.)(Pry Wt.)
16.
0.
155.
528.
3307.
820.
775.
299.
371.
29.
0.
0.
792.
391.
20.
174,
738.
8.
0.
117>
1550.
335.
1422.
0.
40.
0.
32.
0.
148.
622 »
103.
2496.
352.
0.
594.
311.
83.
359,
0,
125,
4,
1122.
0.
31.
0.
25.
0.
117.
491,
92.
1971.
278.
0.
469.
245,
,46.
234,
0.
99.
48.
73,
748,
108.
~*7 .
4c>.
310.
0.
03.
4o .
15000,
1986.
2462.
658.
1360.
2874,
1197,
210.
916,
3027,
310,
Hazardous Waste Flammable
(Wet Wt.) (Dry Wt.) Solvents
10.
0.
98.
333.
2089.
518.
490.
189.
235.
18.
0.
0.
500.
247.
13.
110,
466.
5.
0.
74.
979,
"* 1 '* >
898.
0,
25.
0.
20.
0.
93.
393.
65.
1577,
222 *
0.
375.
196.
53 *
227 ,
0.
79.
38.
53,
598,
87,
OO t
37.
248.
0.
67.
37,
12000.
1589.
1970,
526.
1038-
TOQQ ^
957,
168.
733.
"> i} ")") t
2
1.0
,0
0,
1 2
2,0
,4
1.9
0.
.1
0.
.0
0.
o
.8
.1
3.3
.5
0.
.8
, 4
.1
* 5
0,
o
,1
.1
1 .2
*?
.0
,1
.5
0,
.1
.1
25.0
3.3
4.1
1, 1
2-3
4,8
2.0
,3
1,5
5.0
» 5
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
6.7
0.
66.0
225.0
1410.1
349.6
330.6
127,6
158.3
1 *"* » ***
0.'
0.
337. B
166.8
8.7
74.3
314,7
3.3
0,
50.0
660.8
142.8
606.2
0.
16.9
0.
13.5
0.
63.0
265.3
44.0
1064,4
150.1
0.
253.2
132.5
35 . 5
153.1
0.
53.3
25.9
39.2
403,8
58.5
14.9
24.7
167.6
0.
45.1
25.1
8101.0
1072,5
132". 7
355 . 4
734.5
1551,9
616.4
113.4
494.6
1635,1
167.6
.1
0.
1 .2
4.2
26.1
6.5
6.1
2.4
2.9
+ 2
0.
0.
6.3
3.1
t 2
1 ,4
5.8
.1
0.
.9
12.2
2.6
11 .2
0.
.3
0.
,3
0.
1.2
4,9
,8
19.7
2.8
0.
4.7
2.5
.7
2.8
0.
1 .0
. 5
.7
7.5
1.1
.3
. 5
3.1
0.
.8
.5
150.0
19.9
24,6
6.6
13.6
28.7
12.0
2, 1
o , 2
30,3
3,1
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindings
.5
0.
5.3
18.1
113.1
28.0
26.5
10,2
12.7
1,0
0,
0,
27,1
13.4
,7
6,0
25,2
.3
0.
4,0
53.0
11.5
48.6
0,
1.4
0.
1 .1
0.
5.1
21.3
3.5
85.4
12,0
0,
20,3
10,6
2.8
12,3
0,
4.3
2.1
3.1
32.4
4.7
1.2
2.0
13. 4
0.
3.6
2.0
650.0
36,1
106.7
23.5
53.9
124,5
51,9
9. 1
39, 7
131,2
13*4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
J-12
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — ELECTROPLATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW UERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
x
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total
Waste
(Wet Wt . ) (Dry_ Wt . )
25.
0.
244 *
333.
522? .
1295,
1224.
472.
586.
45.
0.
0.
1251.
618.
32.
275.
i]o5.
12 .
0.
185.
2447.
529.
2245.
0.
62.
0.
50.
0.
233.
"32.
163.
3942.
55o .
0,
938,
491 .
L31 .
567.
0,
1 97.
96.
145.
1495.
2 17.
55.
92.
621 .
0.
L6"7.
93.
14.
0.
139.
472.
2939,
734.
694,
268,
332,
26.
0,
0.
709.
350.
13,
156,
660,
7.
0,
105.
1387.
300,
1272,
0,
35.
0.
28,
0.
132,
557.
92 .
2234 ,
315,
0.
531.
273.
74.
321.
0.
112.
54.
32.
847,
123.
31 .
52.
352.
0.
95.
53 .
Hazardous Waste Flammable
(Wet Wt.)
19.
0.
187,
639.
4003.
993.
939.
362.
449,
35.
0.
0.
959.
474.
25,
211.
893.
9.
0.
142,
1876.
405.
1721,
0.
48.
0.
38.
0.
179,
753.
125.
3022.
426.
0.
719,
376,
101 ,
435.
0.
151.
74,
111.
1146.
166.
42,
70.
476.
0.
128.
71 ,
(Dry We.) Solvents
7.
0.
73.
250.
1567.
388.
367.
142.
176.
14.
0.
0.
375.
185.
10,
33.
350.
4.
0.
56.
734.
159.
673,
0 ,
19,
0.
15,
0,
70.
295 .
49,
1183,
167,
0,
281,
147,
39.
170.
0.
59.
29.
44.
449.
65.
16.
27.
186.
0.
50.
' Q
3.
0,
32,
108.
676.
168.
158,
61,
76.
6.
0.
0,
162.
80.
4.
36.
151,
o
0.
24.
317.
68.
290,
0.
3,
0,
6.
0.
30.
127.
21.
510.
72 *
0.
121.
64.
17.
73.
0,
26.
L2.
19,
193.
28.
7.
12.
80.
0,
'TO
12,
Heavy
Metals
o
0.
2*2
7.6
47.7
11.8
31.2
4.3
5.4
,4
0.
0.
11.4
5,6
.3
2.5
10,6
. 1
0.
1 ,7
22,3
4,3
20.5
0 .
.6
0.
.5
0.
2. 1
9,0
1 ,5
36.0
5. 1
0.
8.6
4.5
1 .2
5.2
0.
1 ,8
. 9
1.3
13.7
2.0
. 5
.8
5.7
0.
I .5
.3
Acids /Alkali
Sweepings &
Oils Solution Cyanide Grindings
.8
0.
8.3
28,2
177.0
43.9
41.5
16,0
19.9
1 .5
0.
0.
42 , 4
20.9
1,1
9.3
39.5
, 4
0.
6.3
83.0
17.9
76.1
0 *
2. 1
0.
1 .7
0.
7.9
33.3
5.5
133,6
18,8
0.
31 ,8
16,6
4.5
19 ,2
0.
o.7
3,3
4,9
50,7
7,3
1 .9
3, 1
21.0
0,
5.7
3,2
t >->
0.
1.9
6.3
39.7
9.8
9.3
3,6
4,5
,3
0.
0.
9,5
4.7
+ 2
2. 1
8.9
, 1
0 .
1 . 4
13.6
4.0
17. 1
0 *
,5
0.
,4
0.
1 ,8
7.5
1 .2
30.0
4 .2
0.
7 » 1
3.7
1 .0
4.3
0 .
1*5
,7
1 . 1
11.4
1 .6
.4
,7
4.7
0.
1 .5
,7
.0
0.
.0
.0
, 2
.0
.0
,0
.0
.0
0.
0 ,
,0
.0
.0
, 0
.0
, 0
0 *
, 0
, 1
. 0
, 1
*
.0
0 .
. 0
0.
.0
. 0
. 0
. 1
.0
0 ,
.0
,0
.0
.0
0 .
.0
.0
,0
,0
. 0
, 0
.0
.0
0.
,0
,0
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 ,
0.
0 ,
0 ,
0 ,
0 ,
0 ,
0 ,
,
0 ,
0,
0 ,
0.
0,
0.
0 ,
0 ,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
o ,
0 ,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0 ,
0 ,
0 .
0,
0.
0.
-0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
30000,
I.7QOO.
23000.
9000,
38S2
274,0 1017,0
3972,
4924,
L316,
2720 .
5747,
2 3 ° 4 .
•>20,
1032-
6055,
621,
2251.
2790.
746.
1541 .
3257,
1356.
230.
1033.
343! .
352,
3045.
3775,
I 009 ,
2085 ,
4406.
1835.
322.
] 404.
4642.
476,
1 192.
1477.
395 .
016 ,
1 724 .
~ 1. 3 .
I2o,
549.
1U16.
186.
514,
637.
L 70 .
352 .
744.
310,
54,
237 ,
784.
00,
36
45
12
24
52
21
3
L 6
55
5
.3
.0
.0
.8
* 5
,9
.3
, 7
,-J
,7
L34
1
1
n
66
44
92
94
31
14
62
05
21
.6
,9
.6
, 2
.8
.1
, 2
,1
.3
.0
30
37
JO
2"
U
18
2
13
46
4
>2
,4
.0
-t -f
t ~/
,2
.2
,9
.0
, 7
1 .0
.1
,0
.1
,1
.0
.1
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
c,
0,
0,
0,
0,
J-13
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION -- COATING
1983 State and EPA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
State R«
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLOR'IOA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
EPA
igion
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.
14.
0.
139.
472,
2959,
734,
694.
268.
332,
26.
0,
0.
709,
350,
18.
156.
660.
7.
0.
105,
1307.
300,
1272.
0.
35,
0,
28,
0,
132,
557.
92,
2234.
315.
0,
531.
27S,
74.
32J .
0,
1 12.
S 4 .
82,
847,
123.
31.
52 *
352,
0.
95,
53.
)(Dry Wt.)
13.
0.
130.
444.
2785.
690.
653.
252 ,
313.
24 ,
0.
0.
667.
330.
17,
147,
622,
6,
0,
99,
1305,
282,
1197.
0,
33.
0,
27,
0.
125.
524.
37.
2102.
297.
0,
500.
262,
70.
302.
0.
105.
51 .
77.
798.
116.
29.
49.
331.
0.
89,
50,
Hazardous Waste
(Wet Wt.)
7.
0.
73.
250.
1567.
388.
367.
142.
176.
14.
0.
0.
375,
185.
10.
03.
350.
4.
0.
56.
734.
159.
673.
0.
19.
0.
15.
0.
70.
295.
49.
1183,
167.
0.
281.
147.
39.
170.
0.
59,
29,
44.
449,
65,
16,
27.
186.
0.
50,
28.
(Dry Wt . )
7,
0.
65.
9OO
1392.
345,
326.
126,
156,
12.
0.
0.
334.
165.'
9.
73.
311.
3.
0,
49,
653,
14] .
599,
0.
17,
0.
13.
0.
62.
262.
43.
1051.
148.
0,
250,
131 ,
35,
151.
0.
53.
26.
39,
399.
58.
15.
24.
165,
0.
45,
~>5 ,
Flammable
Solvents
<-> t
0.
16,
54,
333.
84.
79.
31.
38.
3.
0.
0.
81.
40.
0 +
18.
75.
t .
0.
12.
158.
34.
145,
0.
4,
0,
3,
0.
15,
64.
LI.
255,
36.
0.
61,
32,
9.
37,
0.
13,
6.
9,
97.
14,
4,
6.
40.
0.
It .
6,
Heavy
Metals
.4
0.
4.0
13.5
84.4
20.9
19.8
7.6
9,5
.7
0.
0.
20.2
10.0
5
4,4
18,8
* ^
0.
3.0
39,6
8,5
36.3
0.
1.0
0.
.8
0,
3.8
15.9
2.6
63.7
9.0
0.
15.2
7.9
2. 1
9.2
0.
3.2
1.6
2,3
'^ 4 * "*
3,5
,9
1,5
10.0
0,
2. 7
1 . G
Acids/Alkali
Oils
4.0
0.
39.4
134.3
841,6
208.6
197.3
76.1
94.5
7.3
0.
0.
203 ,6
99.6
5.2
44,4
187.3
1,9
0.
29,3
394.4
85.2
361 .8
0.
10. 1.
0,
8,1
0,
37,6
158,3
26,3
635.3
89.6
0.
151 . 1
79.1
21.2
91.4
0,
31 ,8
15.5
23.4
241.0
34.9
8.9
14,8
100.0
0.
26.9
J5.0
Solution
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0»
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Cyanide
.0
0.
.1
t *•)
1.6
.4
,4
.1
+ T
.0
0,
0.
.4
f '•>
.0
.1
,3
.0
0.
,1
.7
1 2
.7
0.
.0
0.
.0
0.
.1
.3
.0
1.2
f o
0.
.3
.1
.0
t *-)
0.
.1
.0
.0
.4
.1
,0
,0
t 2
0,
,1
,0
Sweepings &
Grindings
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
17000.
L6000,
9000.
8000.
1941.
485,0 4835.0
2251.
2790.
746,
1541 .
3257.
1356,
238,
L038.
343 1 .
352.
2.110.
2626.
702.
1451 .
3065,
1277 ,
224.
977.
3229 ,
33i ,
1192,
1477.
395.
81.6.
1724 .
718.
126.
549.
1816,
106.
1059,
1313,
351.
725.
1533.
638.
112.
480.
1615.
165.
257.
319.
05.
176,
372.
1 55 .
27,
119.
392 ,
40,
64
79
21
44
92
38
a
29
97
10
o
.6
* 3
,0
,9
,7
.8
.6
,9
.0
640.
793.
21°.
433.
926,
385,
67,
295.
975,
100,
1
6
1
4
2
8
7
2
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.0
1.2
1.5
.4
,8
1.7
,7
.1
t [j
1,0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
J-U
-------
OFFICE, COMPUTING AND ACCOUNTING MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
SIC 357
PROCESS WASTE GENERATION — FERROUS AND NONFERROUS FOUNDRY
1983 State and EFA Region Totals
(kkg/year)
Total Potentially
Total Hazardous Constituents (Dry Wt.)
EPA
State Region
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
TOTALS
REGION I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
IV
X
IX
VI
IX
VIII
I
III
IV
IV
IX
X
V
V
VII
VII
IV
VI
I
III
I
V
V
IV
VII
VIII
VII
IX
I
II
VI
II
IV
VIII
V
VI
X
III
I
IV
VIII
IV
VI
VIII
I
III
X
III
V
VIII
Total Waste
(Wet Wt.)
14.
0.
139.
472.
2959.
734.
694,
268.
332.
26.
0.
0,
709.
350.
18.
156.
660.
7.
0.
105.
1387.
300.
1272.
0.
35.
0.
28.
0.
J.32.
557.
92.
2234 .
315.
0.
531.
278.
74.
321.
0.
112.
54.
82.
847.
123.
31.
52.
352.
0.
95.
53.
17000.
2251.
2790.
746.
1541 i
3257.
1356.
238.'
1038.
3431.
352.
Hazardous
Waste Flammable
(Dry Wt.) (Wet Wt.) (Dry Wt.) Solvents
14.
0.
139.
472.
2959.
734.
694.
268.
332.
26.
0.
0.
709.
350.
18.
156.
660.
7.
0.
105.
1387.
300.
1272.
0.
35.
0.
28.
0.
132.
557 *
92 .
2234.
315.
0.
531.
278.
74.
321.
0.
112.
54.
82.
847.
123.
31.
52.
352.
0,
95.
53.
17000.
2251.
2790-.
746.
1541.
3257.
1356.
238.
1038.
3431.
352.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Heavy
Metals
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
Acids/Alkali
Oils Solution
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
-0-.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Sweepings &
Cyanide Grindinga
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
J-15
-------
APPENDIX K
PRIVATE WASTE CONTRACTORS AND SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
Type of
EPA Region Facility *
Wayne Disposal Inc.
Yellow Mills Road
Palmyra, N.Y. II L.F.
Walter Pulcini
Route 31
Palmyra, N.Y. 14522 II L.F.
Chem-Trol Pollution Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 200
Model City, N.Y. 14107 II L.F., I.
Falk Metal
15 McAMdle
Rochester, N.Y. II M.R.
Snyder
Richmond, Va. Ill L.F.
Smith Metal & Iron
Richmond, Va. Ill M.R.
L. Lavetan & Sons
246 W. King
York, Pa. 17405 III M.R.
Flash Cleaning Service
R.D. #1
Felton, Pa. 17322 III ***
Abrams Metal Co.
60th & Lindbergit Blvd.
Philadelphia, Pa. 19142 III M.R.
**
M.L.F.
L.F.
I.
S.R.
M.R.
O.R.
U.
- Municipal landfill
- Landfill (type unknown)
- Incineration
- Solvent recovery
- Metal recovery
- Oil recovery
- Unknown
** Scientifically controlled landfill
*** Spreads oil on dirt roads
K-l
-------
APPENDIX K - Cont'd
Dyna-Vac Dyna Kleen Service Co.
2707 Tregaron Ave.
Jeffersontown, Ky. 40299
Factory Services, Inc.
624 Kennedy Road
Lexington, Ky.
Tinsley Bros.
Greenville, S.C.
Lexington Scrap Metal Co., Inc.
461 Angliana Ave.
Lexington, Ky.
Bruce's Iron & Metal, Inc.
46045 York Road
Gastonia, N.C.
Bill Schwartz, Inc.
525 N. Broad St.
Gastouia, N.C.
Golden Strip Septic
W. Bulter Ave.
Mauldin, S.C.
Chem-Met Services, Inc.
18550 Allen Road
Wyandotte, Mieh.
Dial Trucking Co.
14001 Haggerty Rd.
Plymouth, Mieh. 48170
AAA Disposal
Route 51
Rosco, Wise.
Atlas Disposal
Minneapolis,,Minn.
Type of
EPA Region Facility
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
V
L.F.
L.F.
M.R.
M.R.
M.R.
U.
U.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
K-2
-------
APPENDIX K - Cont'd
Industrial Waste Disposal
Franklin, Ohio
Ernest McDaniel
Dayton, Ohio Area
A & A Disposal
Prairie Avenue
Beloit, Wise.
Shobel
Minneapolis, Minn.
Browning Ferris, Inc.
Rockford, 111.
Pollution Controls, Inc.
R.R. No. 1, Box 238
Shakopee, Minn. 55379
Interstate Pollution Control Co,
Div. of Roto Rooter
Peoples Ave.
Rockford, 111.
Sani-Trucking
Rochester, Minn.
Lloyd Bros.
Wausau, Wise.
Clearing Disposal Inc.
5245 W. 38th Street
Cicero, 111.
Solid Pollution Controls Inc.
Minneapolis, Minn.
Armstrong Cesspool Service
7100 - 93rd Avenue, N
Brooklyn Park, Minn.
Type of
EPA Region Facility
L.F.
L.F.
L.F.
V
V
L.F.
L.F.
L.F., I,
O.R.,
L.F., I
U.
U.
U.
U.
U.
K-3
-------
APPENDIX K - cont'd
Koogler Suburban
Dayton, Ohio
Seymour Manufacturing Co.
Solvents Reclaiming Div.
500 N. Broadway
Seymour, Ind. 47274
Lake Disposal
Clare, Mich.
Systems Technology Corp.
Baxter Rd., at Rt. 73
Franklin, Ohio 45005
Eli Sepec
Dayton, Ohio Area
Union Scrap Iron & Metal
210 - 15th Avenue
Minneapolis, Minn.
Central Oil
14134 Southfield Rd.
Southfield, Mich.
Pollution Controls Inc.
P.O. Box 1350
El Dorado, Ark.
Continental Metals
Texas
Robert Barns
Ft. Worth, Texas
Yellow Barrel Co.
Loveland, Colorado
Type of
EPA Region Facility
I.
V
VI
VI
VI
VII
S »K.» t I •
M.L.F.
O.R.,
I., S.R.
O » JV • , I/ . j
M.R.
L.F.
M.R.
M.L.F.
L.F.
* Collect used oil; sell to rerefiners
or used for road oiling.
-------
APPENDIX K - Cont'd
Aero Oil Co.
Denver, Colorado
Johnston Sanitation Co.
Loveland, Colorado
Liss Metal
Ft. Collins, Colo.
United Refined Corp.
Denver Area
Eisenhaeuer
Denver Area
Sabin
Denver Area
Selrex
Denver Area
Van Waters & Rogers
Denver, Colorado
Southern California Chemical
Los Angeles Area
Type of
EPA Region Facility
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
VIII
IX
L.F.
L.F.
M.R.
M.R.
M.R.
M.R.
M.R.
M.R.
L.F.
pal 526
U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1977--240-848/163
K-5
-------