905R80113
5548
                         /             ^
                         METHOD 641:   ANALYSIS OF THIABENDAZOLE
                         IN  WASTEWATER BY  LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY
     1.   SCOPE  AND APPLICATION
         	             }

         1.1  This method  covers the determination of  thiabendazole in municipal
             and  industrial  wastewater.

             Parameter                                            CAS No.

             Thiabendazole                                      148-79-8

         1.2  The  estimated  detection limit (EDL)  for  thiabendazole is listed  in
             Table 1.   The  EDL was  calculated  from the minimum detectable
             response being equal  to 5 times the  background noise using a  100-uL
             injection.   The EDL for a specific wastewater may be different
             depending  on the nature of  interferences in the sample matrix.

         1.3  This is a  liquid chromatographic  method  applicable to the
             determination  of thiabendazole  in municipal and industrial
             discharges.  When this method is  used to analyze unfamiliar samples
             for  thiabendazole, compound identification should be supported by
             at least one additional qualitative  technique.

         1.4  This method  is restricted to use  by  or under the supervision  of
             analysts experienced  in the operation of liquid chromatographs and
             in the interpretation  of chromatograms.  Each analyst must
             demonstrate  the ability to  generate  acceptable results with this
             method using the procedure  described in  Sections 9.2 and 9.3.

     2.   SUMMARY OF METHOD

         2.1  Thiabendazole  is analyzed in the  sample  matrix after solubilization
             with acid  and  filtration to remove particulate matter.
             Chromatographic conditions  are  described which permit the
             separation and accurate measurement  of thiabendazole by direct
             aqueous injection—HPLC with fluorescence detection.

     3.   INTERFERENCES

         3.1  Solvent, reagents, glassware, and other  sample processing hardware
             may  yield  discrete artifacts and/or  elevated baselines causing
             misinterpretation in  liquid chromatograms.  All of these materials
             must be demonstrated  to be  free from interferences under the
             conditions of  the analysis  by running laboratory reagent blanks  as
             described  in Section  9.1.

             3.1.1  The use of high-purity reagents and solvents helps to
                     minimize interference problems.  Purification of solvents by
                     distillation in all-glass  systems may be required.
                                   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Region V, Library
                                   230  South Dearborn Street
                                   Chicago, Illinois  60604

-------
U.S. l&vtrotTmental  Protection Agency

-------
    3.2
3.1.2  Glassware must be scrupulously cleaned (1).  Clean all
       glassware as soon a$ possible after use by rinsing with the
       last solvent used in it.  This should be followed by
       detergent washing with hot water and rinses with tap water
       and reagent water.  It 'should then be drained dry and heated
       in a muffle furnace at 400*C for 15 to 30 minutes.  Solvent
       rinses with acetone and pesticide-quality hexahe may be
       substituted for the muffle furnace heating.  Volumetric ware
       should not be heated in a muffle furnace.  After drying and
       cooling, glassware should be sealed and stored in a clean
       environment to prevent any accumulation of dust or other
       contaminants.  Store the glassware inverted or capped with
       aluminum foil.

Matrix interferences may be caused by fluorescing contaminants that
coelute with thiabendazole.  The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source, depending upon the
nature and diversity of the industrial complex or municipality
being sampled.  Matrix interferences caused by the presence of
particulate matter are removed by filtration.  Unique samples may
require additional cleanup approaches to achieve the detection
limit listed in Table 1.
4.  SAFETY

    4.1  The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used in this method
         has not been precisely defined; however, each chemical compound
         should be treated as a potential health hazard.  From this
         viewpoint, exposure to these chemicals must be reduced to the
         lowest possible level by whatever means available.  The laboratory
         is responsible for maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA
         regulations regarding the safe handling of the chemicals specified
         in this method.  A reference file of material data handling sheets
         should also be made available to all personnel involved in the
         chemical analysis.  Additional references to laboratory safety are
         available and have been identified (2-4) for the information of the
         analyst.

5.  APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT

    5.1  SAMPLING EQUIPMENT FOR DISCRETE SAMPLING

         5.1.1  Vial - 25 mL capacity or larger, equipped with a screw cap
                with hole in center (Pierce #13074 or equivalent).
                Detergent wash, rinse with tap and distilled water, and dry
                at 105* before use.

         5.1.2  Vial - 3.5 ml, equipped with a screw cap with hole in center
                (Pierce #13019 or equivalent).

-------
         5.1.3  Septum - Teflon^ - faced silicone (Pierce #12722 or
                equivalent).  Detergent wash and dry at 105*C for one hour
                before use.
         5.1.4  Septum - TeflonR - Faced silicone (Pierce #12712 or
                equivalent).  Detergent wash and dry at 105  for 1 hour
                before use.

    5.2  Syringe — Glass, 5 ml with Leur tip.

    5.3  Syringe filter holder — Stainless steel with Leur connection
         (Rainin 38-101 or equivalent).
    5.4  Filters — 13 mm, Nylon 66, 0.45-y pore (Rainin 38-112 or
         equivalent).

    5.5  Balance — Analytical, capable of accurately weighing to the
         nearest 0.0001 gram.

    5.6  High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) apparatus —
         Analytical system complete with liquid chromatograph and all
         required accessories including syringes, analytical columns, and
         mobile phases.  The system must be compatible with the specified
         detectors and strip-chart recorder.  A data system is recommended
         for measuring peak areas.

         5.6.1  Isocratic pumping system, constant flow.

         5.6.2  Injector valve (Rheodyne 7125 or equivalent) with 100-uL
                loop.

         5.6.3  Column — 250 mm by 4.6 mm ID, stainless steel, packed with
                reverse-phase Ultrasphere ODS, 10u.

         5.6.4  Fluorescence detector, for excitation at 300 nm and emission
                at 360 nm.  (Perkin Elmer 650-10S or equivalent).
                Fluorometer should have dispersive optics for excitation and
                utilize either filter or dispersive optics at the emission
                detector.

         5.6.5  Strip-chart recorder compatible with detector, 250-mm.  (A
                data system for measuring peak areas is recommended.)

6.  REAGENTS AND CONSUMABLE MATERIALS

    6.1  Reagent water — Reagent water is defined as a water in which an
         interferent is not observed at the EDL of each parameter of
         interest.

    6.2  Sodium hydroxide solution (ION) — Dissolve 40 grams of NaOH in
         reagent water and dilute to 100 mL.

    6.3  Sodium thiosulfate — (ACS) Granular.

-------
    6.4  Sulfuric acid solution (1+1) — Slowly add 50 ml of
         (specific gravity 1.84) to 50 mL of reagent water.

    6.5  HPLC buffer (pH 8.2) — Add 8 ml of triethanolamine (Eastman 1599)
         and 1 mi of glacial acetic acid (ACS) to 1 liter of reagent water.

    6.6  High-purity methanol — HPLC quality, distilled in glass.

    6.7  Stock standard solution (1.0 ug/uL) — Stock standard solutions are
         prepared from pure standard material or purchased as a certified
         solution.

         6.7.1  Prepare the stock standard solution by accurately weighing
                about 0.0100 gram of pure material.  Dissolve the material
                in pesticide quality methanol, dilute to volume in a IQ-mL
                volumetric flask.  Larger volumes can be used at the
                convenience of the analyst.  When compound purity is
                certified at 96 percent or greater, the weight can be used
                without correction to calculate the concentration of the
                stock standard.  Commercially prepared stock standards can
                be used at any concentration if they are certified by the
                manufacturer or by an independent source.

         6.7.2  Transfer the stock standard in Teflon^-sealed screw-cap
                bottle.  Store at 4*C and protect from light.  The stock
                standard should be checked frequently for signs of
                degradation or evaporation, especially just prior to
                preparing calibration standards.

         6.7.3  The stock standard must be replaced after 6 months, or when
                comparison with quality control check samples indicates a
                problem.

7.  SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND STORAGE

    7.1  Collect all samples in duplicate.  Grab samples must be collected
         in glass containers.  Conventional sampling practices (5) should be
         followed, except that the bottle must not be prewashed with sample
         before collection.

    7.2  The samples must be iced or refrigerated at 4*C from the time of
         collection until analysis.  Chemical preservatives should not be
         used in the field unless more than 24 hours will elapse before
         delivery to the laboratory.  If the samples will not be analyzed
         within 48 hours of collection, the sample should be adjusted to a
         pH range of 1.0 to 3.0 with sodium hydroxide or sulfuric acid, and
         35 mg of sodium thiosulfate per ppm of free chlorine should be
         added.

    7.3  All samples must be analyzed within 30 days of collection. (6)

-------
8.  CALIBRATION AND STANPARIZATION   .

    8.1  Establish liquid chromatographic operating parameters equivalent to
         those indicated in Table 1.

    8.2  Prepare calibration standards at a minimum of three concentration
         levels of thiabendazole by adding volumes of the stock standard to
         a volumetric flask and diluting to volume with HPLC mobile phase.
         One of the external standards should be at a concentration near,
         but greater than, the EDL, and the other concentrations should
         correspond to the expected range of concentrations found in real
         samples or should define the working range of the detector.8.3.
         Using injections of 100 uL of each calibration standard, tabulate
         peak height or area responses against the mass injected.  The
         results are used to prepare a calibration curve for thiabendazole.
         Alternatively, if the ratio of response to amount injected
         (calibration factor) is a constant over the working range (<10
         percent relative standard deviation, RSD), linearity of the
         calibration curve can be assumed and the average ratio or
         calibration factor can be used in place of a calibration curve.

    8.4  The working calibration curve or calibration factor must be
         verified on each working day by the measurement of one or more
         calibration standards.  If the response for thiabendazole varies
         from the predicted response by ±10 percent, the test must be
         repeated using a fresh calibration standard.  Alternatively, a new
         calibration curve or factor must be prepared.

    8.5  Before using any cleanup procedure, the analyst must process a
         series of calibration standards through the procedure to validate
         elution patterns and the absence of interferences from the reagents.

9.  QUALITY CONTROL

    9.1  MONITORING FOR INTERFERENCES

    Analyze a laboratory reagent blank as described in section 10 each time
    a set of samples is extracted.  A laboratory reagent blank is an aliquot
    of reagent water.  If the reagent blank contains a reportable level of
    thiabendazole, immediately check the entire analytical system to locate
    and correct for possible interferences and repeat the test.

    9.2  ASSESSING ACCURACY

         9.2.1  After every 10 samples, and preferably in the middle of each
                day, analyze a laboratory control standard.  Calibration
                standards may not be used for accuracy assessments and the
                laboratory control standrd may not be used for calibration
                of the analytical system.

-------
            9.2.1.1 Laboratory Control Standard Concentrate - from  the
                    stock standard prepared as described  in Section 6.7,
                    prepare a laboratory control standard concentrate
                    that contains thiabendazole at a concentration of  2
                    ug/mL in methanol or other suitable sol vent.(7)

            9.2.1.2 Laboratory Control Standard - using a pipet  or
                    microliter syringe, add 50.0 uL of the laboratory
                    control standard concentrate to a 10 mL aliquot of
                    reagent water contained in a 10-mL volumetric flask.

            9.2.1.3 Analyze the laboratory control standard as described
                    in Section 10.  Calculate the percent recovery
                         with the equation:


                         P..   100Si
                          I    ^^••^•^^^••••••^•^•H^™
                    where S-j = the analytical results from the
                               laboratory control standard,  in  ug/L;  and
                          T-J = the known concentration of the spike,
                               in
     9.2.2  At least annually, the laboratory should participate  in
            formal performance evaluation studies, where solutions of
            unknown concentrations are analyzed and the performance  of
            all participants is compared.

9.3  ASSESSING PRECISION

     9.3.1  Precision assessments for this method are based upon  the
            analysis of field duplicates (Sect. 7.1).  Analyze  both
            sample vials for at least 10% of all samples.  To the extent
            practical, the samples for duplication should contain
            reportable levels of thiabendazole.

     9.3.2  Calculate the relative range (RRi) with the equation:
                          100 R.

                   1       T
            where   Ri =    1 the absolute difference between the
                              duplicate measurements X] and X2, in
                              ug/L; and
                    XT =      the average concentration found ([X] +
                              X23/2), in ug/L.

     9.3.3  Individual relative range measurements are pooled to
            determine average relative range or to develop an expression
            of relative range as a function of concentration.10.

-------
10.  PROCEDURE

    10.1  SAMPLE PREPARATION

         10.1.1 Adjust the pH of the sample to pH 1-3 with sulfuric acid
                solution.

         10.1.2 Assemble the syringe-filtration assembly by attaching the
                filter holder (with filter) to a 5-mL glass syringe equipped
                with a Leur tip.

         10.1.3 Remove the barrel  from the syringe and pour a 4 to 5 ml
                aliquot of the acified sample into the syringe, allowing room
                for reinsertion of the syringe barrel.

         10.1.4 Filter a portion of the sample through 0.45-p filter using a
                syringe filter holder.  The first few milliliters should be
                discarded.  Collect the filtrate in a 4-mL vial equipped with
                a TeflonR-sealed screw cap.

         10.1.5 The syringe and filter holder should be rinsed with acetone
                or methanol and then HPLC water between samples.

    10.2  CLEANUP AND SEPARATION

         10.2.1 Cleanup procedures may not be necessary for a relatively
                clean sample matrix.  Use of fluorescent detectors, however,
                often obviates the necessity for cleanup of relatively clean
                sample matrices.  If particular circumstances demand the use
                of an alternative  cleanup procedure, the analyst must
                determine  the elution profile and demonstrate that recovery
                is no less than 85 percent.

    10.3  LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

         10.3.1 Table 1 summarizes the recommended operating conditions  for
                the liquid chromatograph.  Included in this table are the
                estimated  retention time and estimated detection limit that
                can be achieved by this method.  An example chromatogram
                achieved by this column is shown in Figure 1.  Figure 2  is a
                chromatogram of thiabendazole in a POTW wastewater sample.
                Other columns, chromatographic conditions, or detectors  may
                be used if data quality comparable to table 2 is achieved.

         10.3.2 Calibrate  the system daily as described in Section 8.

    10.4  Inject 100 yL of  the filtered aqueous sample.  Monitor the column
         eluent at excitation wavelength 300 nm (5-nm slit width) and
         emission wavelength 360 nm (10-nm slit width).  Record the resulting
         peak size in area or peak height units.

-------
    10.5 The retention time window used to make identifications should be
         based upon measurements of actual retention time variations of
         standards over the course of a day.  Three times the standard
         deviation of a retention time for a compound can be used to
         calculate a suggested window size; however, the experience of the
         analyst should weigh heavily in the interpretation of chromatograms.

    10.6 If the response for the peak exceeds the working range of the
         system, dilute the sample with mobile phase and reanalyze.

    10.7 If the measurement of the peak response is prevented by the presence
         of interferences, further cleanup is required.

11. CALCULATIONS

    11.1 Determine the concentration of thiabendazole in the sample.

         11.1.1 Calculate the amount of thiabendazole injected from the peak
                response using the calibration curve or calibration factor in
                Section 8.2.2.  The concentration in the sample can be
                calculated from the following equation:

                     Concentration, ug/L = (A) (1000)


                where:

                A  = Amount of thiabendazole injected (nanograms) and
                V-j « Volume of sample injected (yL).

    11.2 Report results in wg/L without correction for recovery data.  When
         duplicate and spiked samples are analyzed, report all data obtained
         with the sample results.

12.  METHOD PERFORMANCE

    12.1 The EDL and associated chromatographic conditions for thiabendazole
         are listed in  Table 1(8).   The EDL is defined as the minimum
         response being equal to 5 times the background noise, using a
         100-uL injection.

    12.2 Single operator accuracy and precision studies were conducted by
         Environmental  Science and  Engineering, Incorporated (6), using a
         spiked POTW sample.  The results of these studies are presented in
         Table  2.

-------
REFERENCES
    1.   ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part 31, 03694, "Standard Practice
         for Preparation of Sample Containers and for Preservation,"
         American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p.
         679, 1980.
    2. ,  "Carcinogens - Working with Carcinogens," Department of Health,
         Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease
         Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
         Publication No. 77-206, Aug. 1977.

    3.   "OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry" (29 CFR 1910),
         Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 2206 (Revised,
         January 1976).

    4.   "Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories," American Chemical
         Society Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety, 3rd Edition,
         1979.

    6.   Test procedures for Pesticides in Wastewaters, EPA Contract Report
         #68-03-2897, unpublished report available from U.S. Environmental
         Protection Agency, Environdmental Monitoring and Support
         Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohiio 45268.

    7.   "Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater
         Laboratories," EPA-600/4-79-019, U.S. Environmental Protection
         Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
         Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, March 1979.

    8.   "Evaluation of Ten Pesticides Methods," U.S. Environmental
         Protection Agency, Contract No. 68-03-1760, Task No. 11, U.S.
         Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio
         45268.

-------
                                    TABLE  1
                    LIQUID  CHROMATOGRAPHY  OF  THIABENDAZOLE*
Compound
Retention Time
  (minutes)
Estimated Detection
    Limit (ug/L)
Thiabendazole
       4.3
           1.7
*  HPLC conditions:  10 y reverse-phase Ultrasphere ODS, 4.6 mm by 250 mm
   column; isocratic 70 percent methaneI/30 percent buffer; flow rate 1
   mL/min.
                                    TABLE  2
                    SINGLE OPERATOR ACCURACY AND PRECISION
Parameter
Thiabendazole
Spike
Concentration
(ug/L)
12.5
625
Number of
Replicates
7
7
Average
Percent
Recovery
100
92.8
Standard
Deviation
(%)
9.5
4.5
*POTW effluent.

-------
0123456
     Retention Time (Win.)
FIGURE 1.  HPLC OF THIABENDAZOLE

-------
                        ~»ATE DUE
US Environmental  Protection Agency
Chicago,

-------
     0    '1    2    3   4    5    6

          Retention Time (Min.)

FIGURE 2.  CHROMATOGRAM OF THIABENDAZOLE
           IN WASTEWATER SAMPLE.

-------