5593 United States ' Region 5 September 1984 Environmental Protection 230 South Dearborn Street Agency Chicago, Illinois 60604 Region 5 905R84113 AIR QUALITY US. Envlronmtntal Protection Aftmcgj «9gion V, fcit^ry Jf 230 Soqth^ Detarborn Street ; Chicago. Winbjs 60604 ------- ------- United States Region 5 September 1984 Environmental Protection 230 South Dearborn Street Agency Chicago, Illinois 60604 Region 5 AIR QUALITY CONTENTS Region 5's Clean Air Program 2 The Clean Air Act 3 Building Owners, Contractors Targeted by EPA Asbestos Rules 4 Clean Air Act Mandates Standards 5 Thorium-Extraction Plant Leaves Radioactive Problem in West Chicago . 6 Special Section: Autos and Air Pollution EPA Requires Vehicle Inspections in Some Cities 8 Clean Air Campaign Targets Fuel Switchers 10 Agency to Limit Lead in Gas 11 Summer is Ozone Season in Region 5 12 '85 Cars to Feature New Mileage Estimates 13 Retirees Get Chance at Clean Air Jobs 13 How Your Car Limits Air Pollution 14 Adamkus: Midwest Wants Fair Acid Rain Burden 16 New Method Promises Cheaper S02 Control 17 Wisconsin Expands S02 Controls 18 EPA Study Helps Save Ohio Mining Jobs 19 Region 5's Air Pollution Control Primer 20 EPA Plans New TSP Standards 21 Agency Studies Air Toxics 22 Air Experts Plan Battle Creek Solution 23 Bubbles Still Used in Midwest 24 Enforcement Summary 26 For Further Information 28 Region 5 AIR QUALITY is a special publication prepared by the Office of Public Affairs, EPA Region 5, 230 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Regional Administrator Valdas V. Adamkus Acting Director, Office of Public Affairs Mary J. Canavan Editor and Writer Kathleen Osborne Clute Graphic Designer.^ _•_-,. -,.,.-. 7.>,. = ••••—-BiiH>te«A.§^Iota Artist "-'••.* Robert Nagel ------- Region 5's Clean Air Program EPA's clean air program 4>s entering its teens. And, like most adolescents, it is undergoing a period of rapid change. These changes are occurring for several reasons, but the most significant is that we have been successful in controlling smokestack emissions of particulates and sulfur dioxide in many parts of the country. With that task largely accomplished, three new control programs are rapidly developing that will define air pollution control efforts for the next decade or more. These three programs are aimed at controlling automobile emissions, air toxicants, and acid rain. The focus on controlling auto emissions is being expanded from the Agency's traditional approach of requiring automakers to install emission controls on new cars to requiring inspection and maintenance programs in many urban areas that will ensure that motorists keep their emission controls in good working order. Complementing the inspection and maintenance efforts are inspections to see that fuel switching does not occur at gasoline stations and prosecution of those who tamper with or remove emission controls. The Agency is also proposing a 91 percent reduction in the amount of lead allowed in gasoline. David Kee answers questions at a recent EPA press conference on fuel switching. Programs such as these will direct!' affect the car owner who might not have been aware of pollution controls in the past. The nature of the Federal- State partnership, and the fact that many of these measures have alread\ been authorized, means that Congres will not need to make further changes in the act in order to implement this rather far-reaching change in progran approach. Air toxicants are also attracting increased attention and concern at EPA. The same concerns over toxic dumps or contaminated water supplie extend to the air we breathe. By restricting our air pollution control efforts in the 1 970's to a few well- known pollutants, the Agency's effort under the Clean Air Act have fallen behind similar programs in water and ------- hazardous waste management. Few emissions to the air have been adequately characterized for their potential toxicity, and fewer yet have been controlled. Defining and dealing with this issue will be a major activity in air pollution control in the next decade. In many cases, States will be controlling air toxicants with technical assistance from the Federal Government. The third significant area of new activity is acid rain control. Unlike the other two areas already discussed, reducing emissions which contribute to this problem will require Congressional action. Unlike the case with air toxicants. States with the largest sources of emissions also have a tremendous economic incentive not to act. Completing the research needed to forge a national consensus on this problem, developing the necessary legislation without destroying the economies of the regions that produce high-sulfur coal, and implementing an acid rain control program will clearly take until the end of the century. The Clean Air Act has accomplished much in its infancy and childhood. Its teens will be years of great change and even greater challenges. Every American's health and quality of life depends on successfully meeting these new challenges. Air Management Division Director ------- Building Owners, Contractors Targeted by EPA Asbestos Rules Controlling asbestos emissions at renovation and demolition sites is a high priority for EPA, which has recently reissued rules that apply to building owners and contractors. Controlling asbestos emissions at renovation and demolition sites is a high priority for EPA, which has recently reissued rules that apply to building owners and contractors. "This is one more example of trying to reduce the burden of this carcinogen on people," said David Kee, director of Region 5's Air Management Division. " We're going to vigorously enforce this rule so that people don't breathe asbestos into their lungs." Contractors planning to renovate or demolish a building that contains friable (easily crumbled) asbestos must do several things: notify EPA of the planned renovation or demolition; remove the asbestos before any wrecking or dismantling that would break up the asbestos materials; limit asbestos emissions from the site by keeping the asbestos materials wet from the moment they are disturbed until they are disposed of; and limit asbestos emissions by transporting asbestos materials through dust-tight chutes when lowered more than 50 feet. There must be no visible asbestos emissions during all handling of removed asbestos, and the waste should be taken to a landfill that is covered daily with at least 6 inches of clean fill. Asbestos emissions have been regulated since 1973 under the Clear Air Act's hazardous air pollutants section. Along with standards for renovation and demolition, there are standards for asbestos mills, manufacturers, and fabricators, among others. More than 200 manufacturing and fabricating facilities in Region 5 have been inspected and almost all are complyin with the regulations. Asbestos is regulated as a hazardous air pollutant because asbestos fibers can endanger public health if they are not completely sealed in a product. Because the fiber are smaller and more buoyant than ordinary dust particles, they are easily inhaled. Once inside the human body, they can lead to lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma—a cancer of the membranes that line the chest and abdomen. Although EPA first issued the asbestos standard in 1973, some worl practice and equipment portions were not enforced between 1978 and 1983 because of controversy over the Agency's authority to regulate work practices. The reissued regulations are reorganized, rewritten, and "a lot easier to understand," according to Bruce Varner, Region 5 hazardous air pollutant coordinator. EPA is placing a high priority on compliance with the demolition and renovation standard because Agency data show that the number of such sources is greater than that of all other asbestos sources combined, with a compliance status that is much worse. Top: Asbestos fiber under microscope. Bottom: Workers at an industrial boilerhouse put asbestos insulation into bags lor disposal. ------- It is not clear exactly how many companies in the six-State Region 5 area engage in work that would fall under the demolition and renovation standard. The provisions apply only to jobs in buildings of a certain size— private dwellings of four or less living units are exempt from the rule. In 1983, EPA received about 700 notices under the regulation. Timely reporting of planned renovation and demolition work is important because it allows EPA or State inspectors to visit the site and determine if the regulations are being followed. The owner or the contractor may take responsibility for notifying EPA. EPA is eager to achieve uniform compliance with the regulations so that firms who do not take the proper precautions with asbestos are not able to underbid those who do. The Agency has several administrative and judicial tools available to enforce the law. It can issue administrative orders that may require immediate compliance'with the regulations or, in more serious cases, it can file civil or criminal lawsuits seeking penalties. Civil suits include fines of up to $25,000 a day, while a conviction under the criminal portion of the Clean Air Act can result in imprisonment for up to 1 year and fines as high as $25,000 a day. Anyone seeking more information about the asbestos rules should contact Varner at (312) 353-2088. <> Clean Air Act Mandates Standards By Ed Hansen The Clean Air Act makes EPA responsible for periodically reviewing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and revising them as necessary. The act requires that NAAQS be set, and eventually met, for any air pollutant that may reasonably be expected to pose a threat to public health or welfare and that has many or diverse sources. These standards, representing a principal objective of the act, have been set for the following pollutants: ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, paniculate matter, sulfur dioxide, and lead. An NAAQS defines the allowable level at which a pollutant may be present in the atmosphere without causing damage to public health and welfare. There are two types of ambient air quality standards: (1) primary standards to protect human health, and (2) secondary standards to protect public welfare, including protection of vegetation, crops, artifacts, animals, economic values, and personal comfort and well-being. For most pollutants, the primary and secondary standards are identical, but for paniculate matter and sulfur dioxide, health standards are higher than those designed to protect human welfare. The 1977 Clean Air Act requires EPA to review each NAAQS at least every 5 years and to develop for each pollutant air quality criteria that reflect the latest scientific knowledge about the pollutant's effect upon man and his environment. The Act also requires EPA to review and revise, as necessary, all NAAQS's established before 1977. This process is still ongoing. EPA is improving the standard- setting process, partly by using risk analysis techniques to deal with uncertainties not resolved by scientific analysis. Risk assessment allows the Agency to evaluate the probabilities of adverse health effects, their severity, and the numbers of people affected. The use of these new techniques can help decision-makers set ambient air standards that allow an adequate margin of safety. EPA regional offices do not set standards for ambient air quality. Rather, the regions approve or disapprove State Implementation Plans (SIP's) as required by the Clean Air Act. SIP's do set emissions standards for sources of pollution and go through a rulemakmg process. The main intent to the SIP, however, is to demonstrate the means by which a State will achieve and maintain air quality at a level equivalent to the NAAQS. In addition to setting ambient air quality standards, EPA also sets emissions limitations and standards of performance for new stationary sources of air pollution under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, and national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants under Section 112. The Agency also sets emissions standards for moving sources, including motor vehicles and aircraft. ^> ------- Thorium-Extraction Plant Leaves Radioactive Problem in West Chicago Region 5's Air Management and Waste Management Divisions are working together to address the problem of radioactive contamination in the City of West Chicago and surrounding DuPage County, where wastes from a local thorium-extraction plant are stored and buried. Located about an hour west of Chicago in suburban DuPage County, the City of West Chicago was the site of a factory that extracted thorium and rare-earth metals from ore between 1931 and 1973. Thorium compounds produced at the plant were used in the manufacture of gas lantern mantels and were supplied to the Manhattan Project during World War II for use in the production of nuclear fuel. The plant is owned by the Kerr- McGee Chemical Co., which shut it down in 1 973 and has been gradually demolishing the radioactive buildings there. The buildings were first erected by the Lindsay Light Co. to manufacture gas mantles. While the focus of the radioactive problem is on the plant site itself, other parts of the city were contaminated when tailings were deposited (possibly as fill) at a city park, the sewage treatment plant site and certain residential areas. In addition, runoff and discharges of waste materials also led to the contamination of about 2 miles of nearby waterways. t ------- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) estimates that 15,000 yards of radioactive material are located m the Reed-Keppler Park and about 10,000 cubic yards are buried on the site of the city's sewage treatment plant. Additional materials may have been deposited near the plant by air emissions and have been found in 88 spots throughout the city. Wastewater discharges from the plant also contributed to radioactive deposits now located along the banks and in the sediment of 2 miles of nearby Kress Creek and a small stretch of the west branch of the DuPage River. Thorium has been found as deep as 5.5 feet along the banks of Kress Creek, according to a study performed for the NRC. The NRC, which licensed the plant after the 1954 Atomic Energy Act was passed, has ordered the company to prepare a plan to clean up the creek and river and then to perform the cleanup. The company is contesting the terms of the order and has taken the case before the NRC Licensing and Appeals Board. Kerr-McGee has already begun tearing down the factory buildings and cleaning up the part of the plant site where the buildings were located. The company plans to relocate and bury all contaminated wastes at the south end of the property. EPA has expressed strong reservations about this course of action. Because the NRC licensed only the plant and its discharges, it disclaims jurisdiction over any wastes that were deposited before the Atomic Energy Act was passed. Kerr-McGee and the City of West Chicago are cooperating to remove contaminated soil from residential property in the city—a move acceptable to EPA as long as proper waste handling and disposal procedures are followed. Due to the large amount of contami- nated dirt involved, the NRC has amended Kerr-McGee's permit to allow storage of the dirt on the factory site. The study and cleanup of other contaminated areas—the wastewater treatment plant, the park and residential areas outside the city proper—are being negotiated by attorneys for EPA and Kerr-McGee. Failing an agreement by the company to undertake the neces- sary studies and cleanup, EPA can use money from its Superfund hazardous waste cleanup program to do the work. One concern of local residents, said Jensen, is the health risk that they incur by living in the city. Residents are interested in learning if a health risk exists and if so, what it is. Professionals at the Argonne National Laboratory in Argonne, III., studied 3,039 men who worked at the plant between 1 940 and 1 973 in an attempt to document the long-term health effects of thorium exposure. In a paper presented in 1 981, the researchers noted that the major causes of death in these men were nonoccupational motor vehicle accidents, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and diseases of the respiratory system Some of the cancers and respiratory diseases could have been caused by cigarette smoking, the researchers noted. ^ Workers from Kerr-McGee and the City of West Chicago remove contaminated soil from a residential neighborhood in the city during September 1984. ------- EPA Requires Vehicle Inspections In Major Cities By Virginia Donohue Cars. An American fantasy. Since the Model Trolled off Henry Ford's assembly line in 1908, they have held the attention of the American public. To some they are objects of desire, precious possessions, and a source of awe. To others they represent nothing but headaches —insurance, gasoline, mechanical failures. But regardless of how we feel about cars, they're our prevailing mode of individual transportation. They're also major polluters. Car emissions are hazardous to our health. In an attempt to reduce the amount of air pollution contributed by cars, EPA set emissions limits beginning in 1968. Most cars after 1975 were equipped with emission control systems that featured catalytic converters. Emission controls reduce the amount of pollutants coming from automobiles. But without proper care and mainte- nance, the effectiveness of these systems is decreased. Cars emit three major polluting gases: carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and oxide nitrogen. Carbon monoxide goes directly to the bloodstream and reduces the amount of oxygen in the blood. In large quantities, it is deadly. In smaller amounts, carbon monoxide can cause dizziness, loss of appetite, nausea, blurred vision, and headaches. Hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen react together in the presence of sunlight to form smog, which is made up of ozone and other photo-chemical oxidants. Ozone can cause breathing difficulty, chest pain, chest and nasal congestion, coughing, eye irritation, nausea, and headaches. Over 90 percent of the carbon monoxide and one-third of the hydro- carbons in the air comes from vehicles. The primary cause of high emission levels are maladjustments and inade- quate vehicle maintenance Vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs are designed to reduce the amount of pollution caused by maladjustments, inadequate maintenanace, and tampering. Vehicle I/M programs are required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1 977. The original Clean Air Act gave the States until 1975 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS's). Congress later changed that date to 1982, with some States saying that they would not be able to meet the deadline with reference to the ozone and carbon monoxide NAAQS's. Congress decided to extend the attainment date from 1982 to 1987 in areas with the most severe air quality problems if those areas would agree to implement I/M programs. Congress recognized that the emissions reduction benefits of I/M were great and would help move these areas toward a less polluted environment. I/M programs are operating in parts of 23 States and the District of Columbia. Three more are scheduled to to come on line by summer of 1985. Only four States, three of which are ir Region 5, have yet to implement the required programs. They are Illinois, Michigan, New Mexico,and Ohio. Othe States may also be required to begin I/M programs in areas where existing pollution control strategies have not proven adequate to attain air quality standards. The details of the progam are usually left up to the States. EPA's concern is that the program achieve the requisite emissions reductions and be enforceable. I/M programs improve air quality by requiring periodic testing of emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles. In most I/M programs, motorists take their vehicles to an inspection station operated by the State, or to a garage licensed by the State, to conduct inspections. While the vehicle is running, a probe is placed in its tailpipe. The exhaust is collected by an analyzer, and the amount of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons in the exhaust is measured. ------- The amount of these pollutants in the vehicle's exhaust is compared to the State's standard, which can differ by model year. Older cars are not expected to meet the same standards as newer cars with more sophisticated emission control systems. The pass/fail standards for each model year are set to be within the design capacity of the car. In addition, States may set cost limits on repairs to avoid penalizing people who drive older cars that might require more expensive repairs. The idea is not to make each car emit the same quantity of pollutants, but to have each car emit as little as is reasonable for that car. On the average, only 15 to 30 percent of the cars fail, with the average cost of required repairs ranging from $18 to $35. Most of the repairs are simple maintenance procedures that should be performed on a routine basis anyway. For example, a car that fails due to high hydrocarbon emissions may have improper ignition timing, faulty ignition, misfiring problems, vacuum leaks, an idle speed set too low, worn piston rings or valves, or its exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system incorrectly operating at idle. A car that fails for high levels of carbon monoxide may have a dirty air filter, a stuck choke, a plugged positive crankage ventilation (PCV) system, a broken air pump or control valve, or an idle speed set too low. I/M programs are required m certain metropolitan areas in five Region 5 States—Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Wisconsin's Greater Milwaukee I/M program was the first to begin operation. In April, 1984, Milwaukee- area motorists began taking their vehicles to one of 10 testing facilities operated by a contractor. Motorists do not pay a fee; the contractor bills Wisconsin Department of Transpor- tation approximately $7 for every test it does. The State expects one million cars to be inspected annually. The State of Indiana recently began testing vehicles in Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd counties; the program is operated by the Indiana Vocational Technical College. Five testing facilities and three mobile testing vans are used, with funds coming from a $2.5 million legislative appropriation. There is no motorist fee, and the State will inspect about 500,000 vehicles biennially. Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio are in the process of developing programs for various metropolitan areas within those States. A vehicle inspection program in action. ------- Clean Air Campaign Targets Fuel Switchers V. The theme of this year's Clean Air Week, "Don't Exhaust Our Air Supply," was targeted at motorists who contribute to air pollution by putting leaded gasoline in cars designed for unleaded. Fuel switching, as this practice is called, is illegal. It can affect public health by disabling a vehicle's emission control systems—particularly the catalytic converter—and that, in turn, significantly increases lead, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbon emissions. The use of leaded gasoline in vehicles designed for unleaded can increase tailpipe emissions 200 to 800 percent, EPA has determined. More than one million tons of hydrocarbons and 12 million tons of carbon monoxide were spewed from the tailpipes of cars with defective emission control systems during Fiscal Year 1983. Studies show that most people who engage in fuel switching do so to save money—about 7 cents a gallon. However, these people are victims of faulty economics, according to Joe Cannon, EPA's assistant administrator for Air and Radiation. "In the long run, the use of leaded gas in the car will more quickly foul the spark plugs, wear out the exhaust system, degrade the oil, and foul the oxygen sensor in new cars, in addition to ruining the catalytic converter," he said. Cannon estimates that people who substitute leaded for unleaded gasoline will end up paying 12 cents a gallon in extra maintenance and repairs. EPA regulations prohibit fuel switching by retailers and their employees or by fleet operators and their employees and agents. The regulations also prohibit these people from causing or allowing this to happen. Violators are subject to a fine of up to $10,000 per vehicle. In addition, some States and cities have laws that specifically prohibit fuel switching by individuals. Tampering with or removing emission control systems on vehicles is also illegal. The Clean Air Act prohibits mechanics, car dealers, and fleet operators from knowingly removing or tampering with any emission control device. EPA is empowered to collect fines of up to $2,500—and in some cases $10,000—for each vehicle that is tampered with. The antitampering provision was passed by Congress to ensure that cars retain the emission controls that were built into them by their manufacturers. Because motor vehicles emit nearly 75 percent of the total man-made air pollutants in the United States, emission controls are needed to protect public health. Many people believe that removing emission control systems will improve gas mileage and car performance, but there is little evidence to support this. The catalytic converter, the primary means of pollution control on most cars made after 1974, has in fact allowed cars with emission controls to achieve the same or better gas mileage as cars built without controls. Emission controls are part of the total design and function of many components of a car's engine, including the carburetor, distributor, intake manifold and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve. When the emission control design of one of these components is changed, other functions will likely be harmed. This is when fuel inefficiency and poor performance occur. ^ 10 ------- Agency to Limit Lead in Gas By Virginia Donohue EPA Administrator William D. Ruckelshaus has made reducing the lead in our environment a top priority. Ruckelshaus called a July 30 press conference to announce the Agency's intent to reduce the amount of lead in gasoline from 1.1 grams per gallon to 1 gram by Jan. 1, 1986. "That is a 91 percent reduction from current levels," he said. "Our goal, quite simply, is to eliminate environmental lead as a threat to human health, and today's action moves us very close to that goal We are not eliminating lead altogether because it is still essential for the operation of some vehicle engines." "Just in the past 2 years we have very firmly shown that it is the lead in gasoline that is the very serious problem, and not the lead from old layers of paint two coats down, or lead from soldering some cans," said Barry Nussbaum, chief of the fuels branch at EPA's Washington, D.C., headquarters. Lead can cause severe health effects, particularly in children. Children who live in urban areas are the most severely affected. "Lead comes out of a tailpipe and just drops 6 inches," Nussbaum explained. "It is on the street, in the dirt. A kid throws a ball, maybe puts his hand in his mouth, and he has eaten the lead." When inhaled or ingested, lead interferes with the processing of messages in the brain. At low levels it can produce subtle, internal changes, causing children to react more slowly to some stimuli. In higher doses, it lowers children's I.Q. scores, decreases cognitive ability, and damages the kidneys, liver, and reproductive system. It also interferes with the creation of blood. Children absorb lead faster than adults. EPA has regulated the use of lead in gasoline since 1973. The introduction of catalytic converters in 1975 was expected to gradually reduce the amount of lead in air because cars with the converters cannot use leaded gasoline. EPA also lowered the level of lead allowed in gasoline from more than 2 grams per gallon to 1.1 grams per gallon. The maximum amount of lead allowed in unleaded gasoline is .05 grams per gallon. However, the levels of lead in the air have not decreased as dramatically as had been expected, largely because many motorists are using leaded gasoline in cars designed for unleaded. The Agency estimates that leaded gasoline is responsible for about 80 percent of all lead emissions in the air. Many people mistakenly believe that they are saving money when they buy leaded instead of unleaded gasoline. Actually, lead forms corrosive compounds that can damage automobiles. Cars using leaded gasoline need more frequent tune- ups, exhaust system replacements, and oil changes, according to EPA officials. However, some older cars and trucks need leaded gasoline to prevent severe valve damage. A low-lead fuel, with no more than 0.1 grams of lead per gallon, would protect these cars while minimizing environmental damage. Reducing or eliminating lead from gasoline requires extra energy and equipment. EPA estimates that the increased materials and production costs of refining unleaded gasoline are less than 1 percent more than the costs of refining leaded gasoline. As a result, gasoline might be slightly more expensive. "Prevention of illegal fuel switching is one of Region 5's top priorities," said David Kee, director of the regional Air Management Division. "We are working with State and local agencies to see that adequate resources and sufficient legal authority exist to stop people from using leaded gas in cars that are designed for unleaded." & 11 ------- Summer is Ozone Season In Region 5 "Ozone Season" in the Midwest encompasses the months between April and October, when a combination of bright sunshine, high temperatures and existing pollution can react to produce unhealthy levels of ozone in the atmosphere. Ozone, a pungent, toxic gas, is the principal constituent of smog. Formed when hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides are exposed to sunlight, ozone irritates mucous membranes, impairing lung function and aggravating asthma and other respiratory disorders. This pollutant is usually found in large cities and their surrounding areas. In Region 5, the air in the following metropolitan areas has exceeded EPA's ozone standard during past summers: Cleveland and Cincinnati, Ohio; Chicago; Detroit, Mich,; and Milwaukee, Wise. The Indiana suburbs of Louisville and Chicago also have had excess ozone, as has East St. Louis, III. EPA has acted to protect public health by establishing a level of .12 parts per million of ozone in the air. When the ozone levels rise above this, citizens should be aware that exercise can aggravate the health effects of ozone. During exercise, more air and consequently more ozone is inhaled. EPA requires "State implementation plans" from States with ozone problems. These plans must show how a State intends to control emissions of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides so that less ozone will form during the hot summer months. These States are also required to begin vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs that will ensure that cars and light trucks do not emit more pollutants than they are supposed to. Hydrocarbon emissions from vehicles are a principal cause of ozone pollution. To date, only three metropolitan areas in the Region—Milwaukee, Wise, and Indiana counties near Louisville, Ky. and Chicago—have begun I/M programs. Many cities have telephone numbers that citizens can call for air pollution information. To receive a recorded message about air quality in your area, call: Chicago 312/644-9091 Chicago metro area 312/865-6321 Cleveland 216/771-331: Milwaukee 414/799-155! Milwaukee metro area 800/242-472' 12 ------- '85 Cars to Feature New Mileage Estimates By Virginia Donohue The EPA has recently changed the methods used to calculate automobile miles-per-gallon estimates. Mileage figures based on EPA laboratory testing have been higher than actual miles per gallon achieved by motorists, resulting in consumer dissatisfaction. "While the primary function of the estimates will still be to compare similar models by different manufacturers, the revised adjustments will more closely approximate in-use mileage," said Joseph A. Cannon, EPA assistant administrator for Air and Radiation. EPA will mathematically adjust the mileage results obtained in the laboratory beginning with the 1985 model year. City estimates will be reduced 10 percent and the highway estimates will be adjusted downward by 22 percent. These adjustments are based on the average difference between the laboratory estimates and the fuel economy data EPA has collected on vehicles in use. EPA averaged city and highway laboratory estimates and published a single miles-per-gallon estimate on car-price stickers for model years 1 979 through 1 984. Price stickers on new cars beginning in the 1985 model year will feature both the city and the highway estimates. To make the transition to the new procedure easier, price stickers for 1 985 and 1 986 model years will indicate what the single EPA estimate would have been under the old rating procedure and the city and highway estimates calculated under the new procedure. "Consumers should be aware that their actual mileage may still vary from those revised estimates based on road conditions, driving habits, temperature, and numerous other factors that affect fuel economy," Cannon said. These estimates will appear in the EPA/Department of Energy Gas Mileage Guide available in dealer showrooms this fall. A RETIREES GET CHANCE AT CLEAN AIR JOBS Older people with technical knowledge and good communication skills soon will be working as Clean AirCounselors in six Region 5 locations. Using grants from EPA and the U.S. Department of Labor, the American Association of Retired Persons is recruiting self-motivated people to work in various clean air programs in Chicago; Cook County, III.; Wayne County, Mich.; Peoria, III.; Columbus, Ohio; and Minneapolis. The duties of these counselors will vary according to the needs of the local agency, but will be oriented toward educating the public about EPA's fuel switching and antitampering regulations. These regulations are designed to ensure that cars retain the pollution controls built into them by their manufacturers. It is illegal, for example, to put leaded gas in a vehicle designed for unleaded fuel only. In addition, Federal rules do not allow tampering with or removing a car's emission controls. Clean Air counselors probably will work with gasoline retailers, mechanics, community groups, and schools to educate them about these prohibitions. In some instances, the counselors will investigate violations of the regulations Members of the American Association of Retired Persons are already working in EPA's asbestos- in-schools and radiation programs. 13 ------- Thermostatic Air Filter Housing Allows heated air to flow into carburetor to aid warmup. Air is drawn over the exhaust manifold then through a heat pipe to the air filter housing Heating is controlled by a flap in the snorkel which allows heated air to enter when the cold air inlet is closed. Binding or improper control signals can cause hot air to flow after warmup Hot air has less oxygen per volume than cold air. Result: rich mixture, high^ CO, poor combustion, poor fuel^ economy. EGR Valve Recirculates exhaust gases into the intake manifold to reduce Nitrogen Oxide emissons (NOX). Located near the carburetor base on the intake manifold. Deposits can cause EGR valve to remain open at all times. Result: lean misfire, high HC, poor combustion, poor fuel economy. PCV Valve Prevents crankcase vapors from polluting the air by drawing them into the intake manifold. An incorrect PCV valve may lessen intake manifold vacuum. A restricted PCV system may cause improperly high intake manifold vacuum. Result: lean mixture, high HC; rich mixture, high CO, poor combustion, poor fuel economy. Air Filter Filters air entering the carburetor. If restricted, too little air mixes with the fuel in the carburetor. Result: rich mixture, high CO, poor combustion, poor^ fuel economy. Choke Provides a rich mixture for starting by restricting airflow into the carburetor. Binding of the choke plate or external linkages can cause choke to remain closed after warmup. Result: rich mixture, high CO, poor combustion, poor fuel economy. c Air/Fuel Mixture Screws Controls air/fuel mixture at idle and low speeds. Located at base of carburetor. One screw on single barrel carburetor, two screws on multiple barrel carburetors. Improper adjustments can cause either a rich or lean mixture. Result: rich mixture, high CO; lean mixture: high HC, poor combustion, poor fuel economy. How Your Car Limits Air Pollution ------- Engine Vacuum Controls engine and accessory operation. Includes vacuum lines, intake manifold, carburetor, distributor advance unit, and vacuum operated accessories. Air leaks in those components may significantly change the air/fuel ratio. Result lean mixture, high HC; poor combustion, poor fuel economy. Ignition System ** Provides spark at the right time and of the proper duration for good combustion. Improper timing, poor spark or faulty components can cause emission and performance problems. Result: faulty combustion, high HC, poor fuel economy. „ ..-31 Air Pump Provides air to the exhaust manifold for more complete oxidation of HC and CO. Malfunctions of the pump, belt/pulley connection or piping can cause defective operation. Result: high HC. Converter Oxidizes HC and CO to water and carbon dioxide. Located between exhaust manifold and muffler. Use of leaded fuel can reduce converter efficiency. A rich mixture can cause overheating, which may melt the catalyst bed and cause exhaust backpressure. Results: high HC and CO, possible backpressure problem which will reduce fuel economy. Heat Riser Circulates exhaust through special passages of the intake manifold to assist warmup. This valve is located between exhaust manifold and exhaust pipe. If stuck in the cold position, heating will occur after warmup. Result: poor combustion, poor fuel economy. _ ^^ Engine Mechanical Integrity Assures proper engine operation. Includes valves, rings, gaskets, etc. Wear or failure may reduce engine performance. Results: high HC, poor fuel economy. J \ ------- Adamkus: Midwest Wants Fair Acid Rain Burden Acid rain, a controversial topic in the United States and Canada, is a particularly sensitive issue in the coal- producing and heavily-industrialized Midwest. In a recent talk to the Illinois League of Women Voters, EPA Region 5 Administrator Valdas V. Adamkus articulated some of the Region's concerns. The Midwestern States, which contain some of the largest coal-fired electricity generating plants in the country, are troubled by the economic implications of acid rain control, he said. Many have argued that sulfur dioxide from midwestern power plants, carried east by the prevailing winds, is the main source of the acid rain that falls on the lakes and forests of the Northeast. The two acid rain control options currently Available—scrubbers and switching from high- to low-sulfur coal—could have harsh consequences for a regional economy fueled by high- sulfur coal, Adamkus said. Scrubbers are expensive, and the substitution of low-sulfur coal for the high-sulfur coal now used could throw miners out of work from Illinois to West Virginia, the regional administrator noted. Adamkus told the League that "so long as the adverse economic consequences of acid rain control are as severe in the Midwest as they are, there is simply no hope that this high emission area will permit an unbearable burden to be placed on it." He stressed the need for research to develop low-cost technology to clean the high-sulfur coal mined in Region 5. "One possible way to speed the consensus building . . . would be to make the development of low-cost sulfur reduction techniques an absolute prerequisite to instituting a national control strategy," he said. Acid deposition is formed when nitrogen and sulfur oxides from fossil fuel combustion react with oxygen and water vapor in the air to form nitric and sulfuric acids. These acids return to Earth in rain and snow, or as dry deposition. Acid rain gradually lowers the pH (acidity or alkalinity) of soil and water, causing the soil to leach its valuable nutrients and minerals into streams and lakes, where they can poison fish or affect their ability to reproduce. With reference to the Midwest dilemma, Adamkus told the League he believes "the prospects are quite good that research on lower-cost control technologies can lead us out of this morass." While we work to resolve the tough technical issues concerning the nature of acid ram, he said, we need to protect high-sulfur coal markets by developing sulfur dioxide control methods that cost much less than scrubbers. EPA has recently launched an ambitious research program on acid rain to allow the Agency to formulate on appropriate control strategy. EPA Administrator William D. Ruckelshaus has told Congress that the administration will "craft and support an appropriate set of measures to solve the acid rain problem" once some fundamental scientific uncertainties have been reduced. Federal acid rain research is coordinated by the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP), which was established by Congress in 1980 to conduct a 10- year investigation into the extent and causes of acid deposition. EPA, the Department of Agriculture, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) all have active roles in that research and its administration. NAPAP's research budget has jumped from $13 million in 1981 to a proposed $55.5 million in Fiscal Year 1985. EPA's contribution is expected to be $34 million in Fiscal 1985. In testimony before a U.S. Senate subcommittee last winter, Ruckelshaus outlined the areas in which knowledge of acid rain is lacking: Scope of the Problem "We don't know the extent of damage to our aquatic resources from acid deposition," he said. "We need tc get a more accurate picture of the scope and extent of this damage. Trends "Our knowledge of the pace at which the environment is changing is very thin." Several more years of monitoring are needed before we can reach con- clusions about trends in the sulfate and nitrate concentrations of precipitation. We also need information on trends in the pH of rainfall, sulfate and nitrate concentratrions in water bodies, and the rate at which water bodies are becoming acidified. Source/Receptor Relationship "No discussion of acid rain would be complete without a discussion of the relation between the sources of emis- sions and the sensitive receiving areas. Our present knowledge is based., on very simplified transport/transforma- tion models." Role of Dry Deposition "To date, most of our data relate to 'wet' deposition. We do not know the extent of 'dry' deposition because reliable field monitoring techniques are not available." Acidification Process We need to learn more about how the acidification process actually takes place in watersheds, and at what pace. Effects on Forests "Beyond knowing that there has been an apparent decline in the condition of some of our forests, we know little about the scope of the problem or its causes. Acid deposition may be a primary cause, and then again it may not." ^ 16 ------- New Method Promises Cheaper SO2 Control Among the acid rain control options being researched by EPA is one that may reduce sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions more cheaply than currently available control technologies. This technology is called limestone injection to a multistage burner, or LIMB. LIMB technology evolved from EPA-sponsored research into coal burners that would release low amounts of nitrogen oxides. In testimony before the Northeast- Midwest Congressional Coalition earlier this year, EPA's Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory director Frank T. Princiotta explained that LIMB costs may be significantly less than scrubbers— the traditional sulfur dioxide (SC-2) smokestack control technology. Princiotta told the group that preliminary research shows that up to 70 percent of flue gas sulfur can be captured with the LIMB method. "Application of this technique to boilers would provide a relatively simple method to reduce S02 emissions," he said. EPA's LIMB-low nitrogen oxides (NOx) research program goals are to reduce S02 and NOx by 50 to 60 percent in retrofitted boilers, and, in new systems, to reduce NOx by 70 to 80 percent and sulfur oxides (SOx) by 70 to 90 percent of uncontrolled levels. A technology such as LIMB is especially attractive in the Midwest, a region where industries are faced with the prospect of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to control acid-rain-forming emissions from power plants and factories. EPA Region 5 Administrator Valdas V. Adamkus has urged the development of low-cost control technologies as a way of achieving acid rain control in the Midwest with a minimum of economic disruption. "LIMB holds out to us the strong possibility of reducing both the sulfur and nitrogen oxide emission components of acid rain deposition, and at a price we can afford," Adamkus said. "Preliminary estimates indicate that LIMB capital costs may be only one-fifth to one- third as high as scrubbers, and total annual costs, including operating expenses, less than one-half as much." The use of LIMB technology involves injecting fine lime particles into the furnace section of a coal-fired boiler so that the lime particles can mix with the combustion gas from the coal burners. The combustion, or flue, gas contains oxides of sulfur and nitrogen, which can be effectively neutralized by the lime particles These particles later fall into the ash pit, or are trapped in subsequent control devices. The Agency is helping finance a full-scale demonstration of LIMB technology at Ohio Edison's coal-fired Edgewater Station in Lorain. By demonstrating the technology at a power plant, EPA hopes to encourage its acceptance and commercialization by industry & Interior Multi-Stage Burner Wall Atr and fuel mixing optimized "for reduction of NOx with the temperature profile optimized for capture of SO2 with calcined limestone LIMESTONE INJECTION MULTI- BURNER FOR SIMULTANEOUS AND SOa CONTROL 17 ------- Wisconsin Expands SO2 Controls A heightened awareness of acid rain in Wisconsin has been accompanied by a push to control sulfur dioxide (S02)—the pollutant thought to be a major contributor to the formation of acid rain The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is developing statewide S02 regulations that will protect public health and welfare while reducing the State's contribution to the acid rain problem. Sulfur dioxide emissions in Wisconsin come primarily from power plants and paper mills and were previously regulated only on a case-by-case basis in two areas with unhealthy levels of SCh in the air. The Federal Clean Air Act of 1 970 required all States to develop regulations for S02 and other pollutants. Because many States did not do so, the 1977 amendments to the act specified that States were to identify areas where air quality standards were not being met and to develop plans that would allow those areas to comply with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS's). 1980 EMISSIONS OF SO2 BY STATE Illinois , Indiana Lf Michigan ,' Minnesota L_QiliP_¥ Wisconsin •••IBB fiJHBHB••••••••• nmmmnm Jvi«W*"*"y*•«••• Wisconsin originally identified Madison and Brokaw as the two locations in the State where the air quality standards for S02 were not being met. Cleanup plans were implemented, and the State is asking EPA to declare those areas as having attained the air quality specified in the NAAQS's. The State also discovered that the cities of Milwaukee and Green Bay were not attaining the specified air quality, and it developed cleanup plans for those areas. The State recently requested EPA to designate three other areas—Rhinelander, Rothschild, and Peshtigo—as being in need of additional S02 controls in order to achieve the NAAQS's. State natural resources officials are now developing S02 control plans for those areas. The current development of statewide S02 regulations is intended to supplement the existing area- specific cleanup plans and will, for the first time, establish emission limits for industries in the remainder of the State. In testimony before the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board last winter, EPA Region 5 representative Carl Nash noted that "there is additional work to be done throughout many parts of the State to protect public health." Nash praised the State of Wisconsin for following the example of other Region 5 States by developing a statewide S02 emisssions limit. "We feel this is an excellent first step for the State to expeditiously respond to Clean Air Act requirements," Nash told the board. The State previously regulated S02 emissions only in Madison and Brokaw. Wisconsin officials are expected to present statewide SCh regulations to the natural resources board for approval later this year. They will then be submitted to EPA for final concurrence. •?> 18 ------- EPA Study Helps Save Ohio Mining Jobs By Virginia Donohue Facing the potential loss of their jobs, workers at the Sunnyhill Mine in New Lexington, Ohio, asked the EPA to investigate the link between Michigan environmental regulations and the possible closure of their mine The Consumers Power Co. J. H Campbell Plant in West Olive, Mich., recently said it would have to break its longstanding contract with the mine so it could buy the lower sulfur coal it needed to comply with Michigan's low-sulfur emission rules. Sunnyhill coal has a high sulfur content. The miners and other concerned area residents petitioned their Congressman, Rep Clarence Miller, for help. As a result, Rep. John Dingell of Michigan requested a study of the situation pursuant to Sect. 321 of the Clean Air Act. The purpose of a Sect. 321 investigation is to determine what, if any, effect the Clean Air Act has on potential losses or shifts in employment. However, the investigation in no way requires or authorizes the Agency or the States to modify or withdraw any requirements imposed under the Act. Michigan had passed its low-sulfur rule, which is stricter than comparable Federal rules, as part of various pollution control efforts made under the Clean Air Act. In testimony before the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission (MAPCC) on June 18, 1 984, Region 5 Air Management Division Director David Kee outlined the findings and recommendations of EPA's 321 study on Sunnyhill. Kee told the commission that the Sunnyhill Mine is vital to the economy of New Lexington, a small, one- industry town located about 50 miles southeast of Columbus. The mine, owned by Peabody Coal Co., is the largest employer in Perry County with a workforce of 520. After hearing testimony from Kee and other parties, the MAPCC gave Consumers an extension that will allow the company to continue buying Sunnyhill Coal for another 3 years. In 1972 MAPCC established regulations that require plants to either burn fuel with a maximum of 1 percent sulfur or to achieve an equivalent emission rate. Sunnyhill coal has a sulfur content of 3 5 percent. In 1979, MAPCC gave Consumers a 5-year extension to come into compliance by Jan. 1, 1985 In November 1983 Consumers asked MAPCC for another 5-year extension. It was denied. Consumers then told Peabody that they would not be able to purchase anymore Sunnyhill coal. Peabody told the miners that without a contract with Consumers, the mine would close. During the course of EPA's investigation, Sunnyhill lowered its coal prices and Consumers returned to MAPCC with a request for a 3-year extension. During his testimony before the MAPCC in June, Kee outlined the draft findings and recommendations of the Agency's Sect 321 study. The draft study concluded that. • Switching to a lower sulfur coal is the most economical option for Consumers to comply with Michigan's sulfur rule. • Termination of Sunnyhill's contract with Consumers is likely to result in the shutdown of the mine for an undetermined period of time. • The economic consequences of the shutdown of Sunnyhill would be potentially catastrophic for New Lexington and severe for surrounding Perry County. • Michigan's sulfur regulation is more stringent than is required by Federal law. But because Michigan's requirement is part of the Michigan State Implementation Plan, it is enforceable under the Clean Air Act. • Alternative lower cost sulfur control techniques that are under development may eventually provide a means for high sulfur coal like Sunnyhill's to be used and comply with Michigan's regulation yet be cost effective for Consumers. • Granting another extension for Consumers without developing a plan for installing emission controls may merely defer a solution to the problem and ensure a recurrence of the economic crisis currently threatening Perry County. The draft study recommended that MAPCC grant Consumers a 1 -year extension, provided that the governors of Ohio and Michigan form a task force charged with developing an acceptable program which minimizes adverse economic impacts in both States Among the strategies that the study recommended considering are a variety of technical options and cost- sharing between the two States. After considerable testimony, the MAPCC agreed in a 5-4 vote to grant Consumers a 3-year extension. Consumers assured MAPCC it would not seek another extension and Peabody said it would find another market for Sunnyhill coal during this period. "EPA recommended a middle course of action which we thought might lead to a permanent solution that satisfies both environmental and economic concerns," said Kee. "Only time will tell if Sunnyhill will find a new market for its coal after the extension expires in 1987." A 19 ------- Region 5's Pollution Control Air pollutants are traditionally divided, for control purposes, into three categories: particulates, gases, and vapors (volatile organic compounds—VOC's). Various control technologies described in EPA's Air Pollution Engineering Manual (Second Editon) are summarized below: Particulates A participate is any material that exists as a solid or liquid at standard conditions. Dust, smoke, fumes, mists and sprays are examples of particulate matter. Many kinds of devices for controlling particulates are available. Broadly divided into classes, they are. mertial separators, wet collection devices, fabric filters, single-stage electrical precipitators, two-stage electric precipitators, and other particulate collecting devices. INERTIAL SEPARATORS are the most widely used devices for collecting medium- and coarse-sized particulates. This equipment operates on the principle of imparting centrifugal force to the particle to be removed from the carrier gas stream. This force is produced by directing the gas in a circular path or affecting an abrupt change in gas direction. WET COLLECTION DEVICES use a variety of methods to wet the contaminant particles in order to remove them from the gas stream. There is a wide range in their cost, collection efficiency and the amount of power they expend. The advantage of wet collectors is that they present no secondary dust problems in disposing of the collected dust, and they can handle high-temperature or moisture- laden gases. Space requirements are relatively small, but disposal or clarification of the wastewater may be difficult or expensive. The principal means by which liquids may be used to remove aerosols from gas streams are: wetting of the particles by contact with a liquid droplet and impinging wetted or unwetted particles on collecting surfaces, followed by their removal from the surfaces by flushing with a liquid. Types of wet collection devices include spray chambers, cyclone-type scrubbers, orifice-type scrubbers, mechanical scrubbers, high-pressure sprays, packed towers, and wet filters. BAGHOUSES (fabric filters) are devices that remove suspended dust and fumes by trapping them on a fabric filter. When high collection efficiency on small particle size is required, they are the most efficient, widely used method of separating dust from air. The fabric is usually made into bags of tubular or envelope shape and the entire structure housing the bags is called a baghouse. SINGLE-STAGE ELECTRICAL PRECIPITATORS. Electrical precipi- tation is the use of an electrostatic field for precipitating or removing solid or liquid particles from a gas in which the particles are carried in suspension. Some of the advantages of precipitators include their high efficiency, ability to remove very small particles, ability to operate continuously with little maintenance over long periods, ability to collect acid and tar mists that are difficult, if not impossible to remove by other methods, and low power requirements. However, the initial cost of precipitators is high—more than that required for any other form of air pollution control—and they may require more space than a baghouse. TWO-STAGE ELECTRICAL PRECIPITATORS involve passing contaminated air through a variable- strength ionizing field before subjecting it to a separate uniform field where the charged particles are collected. Two-stage precipitators are widely used for removing oil mist created during operation of high-spee cutting or grinding tools. Hotels, restaurants, food-processing companies, and pharmaceutical manufacturers often use this method to clean circulating air. Gases (NOx and SOx) and Vapors (VOC's) They are controlled by such methods as incineration, adsorption, absorption, and condensation. INCINERATORS, also called afterburners, are air pollution control devices which convert the combustible materials in gaseous effluents to carbon dioxide and water. The combustible materials may be gases, vapors, or trapped particulate matter and may contribute opacity, odor, irritants, "fallout" materials, photochemical reactivity, and toxicity to the effluents. In many cases, an afterburner can be designed and operated so that many of these problems are eliminated or reduced. ADSORPTION is the name for the phenomenon in which molecules of a fluid contact and adhere to the surface of a solid. By this process, gases, liquids, or solids—even at very small concentrations—can be selectively captured or removed from airstreams with specific materials known as adsorbents. The material thus captured is called the adsorbate. A change in the composition of the fluid contacting the adsorbent results when one or more of the components are captured by the adsorbent. 20 ------- Solids with adsorptive properties exist in great variety. They include activated carbon for solvent recovery, elimination of odors and gas purification; alumina for the drying of gases, air and liquids; bauxite for the treatment of petroleum fractions and the drying of gases and liquids; bone char for decolorizing sugar solutions; decolorizing carbons used to decolorize oils, fats, and waxes and to deodorize domestic water; Fuller's earth used in refining of lube oils and vegetable and animal oils, fats, and waxes; magnesia for treatment of gasoline and solvents and removal of metallic impurities from caustic solutions; and silica gel for drying and purification of gases. ABSORBTION is the method by which one or more constituents are removed from a gas stream by dissolving them in a selective liquid solvent. This is one of the major chemical engineering unit operations that is treated extensively in all basic chemic'al engineering textbooks. From an air pollution standpoint, absorption is useful as a method of reducing or eliminating the discharge of air contaminants to the atmosphere CONDENSATION is the most appro- priate control technique for certain /aporous discharges. Vapors can be :ondensed either by increasing pres- sure or extracting heat. In practice, air jollution control condensers operate hrough removal of heat from the vapor. Condensers differ principally in the means of cooling. REFORMULATION is used primarily in the surface coating and solvent degreasing industries. This method involves substituting VOC's with water or nonregulated solvents in the manufacturing process. This method is especially attractive because it involves a process change rather than expensive control technologies, yy EPA Plans New Participate Standard By Virginia Donohue Among the pollutants EPA regulates are total suspen- ded particulates (TSP) — soot, dust, fly ash, and any other particles in the air. The Agency is now proposing to change both the standards and the way it measures particulates. There are now primary and secondary standards for TSP. The primary standards of 75 micrograms per cubic meter of air on an annual average, and 260 micrograms per cubic meter of air over a 24-hour period, are health- based. The secondary standard of 1 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air is set to protect public welfare—property, visibility, etc. Instead of measuring all particulates for the primary standard, the Agency is proposing to measure only those with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less. This has been proposed because research shows that while particulates are bothersome, not all have a health impact. When people breathe, large particles in the air are trapped in the nose and mouth, or oral or nasal cavities. These are usually expelled within minutes. Slightly smaller particles (15 micrometers or less) may work their way down to the trachea and bronchial tubes. These particles will be expelled within hours. Trapped in any of these areas, particles are unlikely to do any serious harm. However, particles 10 micrometers or smaller can enter lungs and the surrounding tissues and blood vessels and may remain there for years. EPA is therefore proposing to monitor only those particles that are 10 micrometers or less, forming a new primary standard called PM10. In addition to changing monitors to take in only particles 10 micrometers or smaller, this calls for determining new primary and secondary standards. To encourage public participation and debate, EPA has not proposed one standard. Instead, it is proposing a range of standards and is encouraging the public to comment on what should be selected from within that range. It is suggested that the 24-hour primary standard be set somewhere between 150 to 250 micrometers per cubic meter of air, and that the annual primary standard be between 50 to 65 micrometers per cubic meter of air. It is also proposed that the secondary standard be measured on an annual, not an hourly basis, and that it use TSP and not PM10 as the pollutant. The suggested range is between 70 to 90 micrometers per cubic meter of air £* 21 ------- Agency Studies Air Toxics EPA is required by the Clean Air Act to control toxic air pollutants, but Agency is still struggling to find the best way to do so. Based on the preliminary findings of an EPA study on the magnitude and nature of the air toxicant problem, a group of high-level Agency officials has been formed to review currenttoxic air pollutant control strategies and to recommend needed changes. Region 5 Air Management Division Director David Kee is a member of the group. The Clean Air Act required EPA to identify and set national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP's) which cause or contribute to air pollution which may result in "an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness." So far, the Agency has listed seven such chemicals and is regulating five: mercury, beryllium asbestos, vinyl chloride, and benzene. A 6-month study by EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards exa- mined several factors related to the air toxicant problem: the magnitude and nature of the problem, geographic variations in risk, and the quality of existing data. "We're trying to determine the quantitative risk of cancer due to air pollution,"remarked Bern Steigerwald, director of the air toxic study. Steigerwald said the Agency has solicited data from State and local agencies throughout the country, along with information from Canada and Europe. Scientists and researchers are trying to determine the cancer risk posed by air emissions from factories (point sources), vehicles (mobile sources), hazardous waste dumps and other sources. This effort, said Steigerwald, will help policy makers within the Agency separate real health risks those which aren not significant And while the data may show that certain chemicals should be regulated under NESHAP's, it may be appropriate to control others on a more limited geographic basis. "A truly effective air toxics program needs different dimensions," he said, noting that the NESHAP's program primarily covers point sources such as chemical plants and is very expensive to develop. As a consequence, the Agency is exploring new ways to regulate certain air toxicants. In the case of one of these, a suspected animal carcinogen called acrylonitrile, EPA estimated that the chemical is responsible for one case of cancer in the entire country every two years. While this risk does not make NESHAP's the optimum way to regulate acrylonitrile, data indicate that some acrylonitrile plants could contribute to an elevated cancer risk in the immediate vicinity of the plants Region 5 is beginning discussions with States that contain acrylonitrile sources in order to determine how best to approach the problem. This Federal-State partnership approach is one alternative to NESHAP's Acrylonitrile isn't the only chemical of concern to Region 5's Air Toxics staff At the request of State agencies and other EPA Region 5 divisions, the air toxics group conducts risk assessments to determine the carcinogenic value o certain chemicals and to quantify the risk those chemicals pose to people. The professionals in the airtoxics group include a PhD chemist, who helps prepare and coordinate health data anc risk assessments; an environmental engineer, who coordinates and tracks State programs; and an environmenta scientist, who quantifies the impact of a pollutant on nearby populations A University of Illinois toxicologist is also available on a consulting basis. Risk assessment and toxicology studies are becoming increasingly important to the Agency, as policy makers in the regions and headquarters continually strive to learn more about the impact of hazardous compounds or human health A 22 ------- Experts Plan Battle Creek Solution By Ed Hansen An example of the Air Management Division's cooperation with other Region 5 divisions to solve an environmental problem is afforded by a recent case near Battle Creek, Mich. A number of wells supplying drinking water to people in the Verona Wells area were found by EPA investigators to be contaminated by various pollutants, including six suspected cancer-causing compounds. It was decided that money from the Agency's Superfund toxic waste cleanup program would be used to rectify the situation, either by cleaning up the existing wells or digging new ones. Since purifying the wells would mean stripping the pollutants from the well water and emitting them into the atmosphere, the need to involve the Air Management Division became evident. Superfund staffers in the regional Waste Management Division approach- ed Steve Rothblatt, the Air Manage- ment Division's deputy director, and asked for information on the health effects of the Battle Creek well contaminants as air pollutants. The Waste Management Division wanted a worst-case assessment of the health risks that could be incurred by indivi- duals exposed to the chemicals. A study of the problem by the Air and Managment Division's Air Toxicant Group revealed evidence that four of the six Battle Creek pollutants were carcinogenic. Research documents and material gathered by Environmental Scientist Harriet Croke were sent to Region 5's consulting toxicologist, Dr. William Hallenbeck of the University of Illinois Medical Center. Hallenbeck, using information from animal studies and a number of simplifying assumptions, calculated the health risks that would be involved if the Battle Creek pollutants were emitted into the air. In conjunction with Hallenbeck's efforts, Region 5 Environmental Scientist John Summerhays modeled the emissions that would be expected to result from stripping the chemicals out of Battle Creek water. For modeling purposes, Summerhays assumed the constant presence of the largest quantities of pollutants ever detected in the contaminated Battle Creek aquifer, thus giving the Superfund staff the worst-case numbers they requested. In addition, Region 5's Office of the Regional Counsel examined the legal ramifications of stripping pollutants out of water and into air. Since Michigan law required the use of best available technology (BAT) in the Battle Creek case, this provision became the controlling factor in EPA's handling of the situation. The Agency determined that the best available technology was a carbon absorption unit that would trap the pollutants as they were removed from the water. EPA ultimately decided to drill new wells to meet summer demand and to clean up the existing wells by use of an air stripper and carbon absorption units purchased with Superfund money, 23 ------- ".•***£"• *;o^*st jf*,- >•** a Bubbles" Still Used in Midwest The "bubble" approach to air pollution control is still being used in Region 5 areas with acceptable air quality, reports Joseph W. Paisie, chief of the regional Air Management Division's technical analysis section. The bubble, or emissions trading, concept was first developed in 1 979 as a means of helping industries comply with the Clean Air Act faster. The idea, Paisie noted, is fairly simple. "If you have two identical sources and an emissions limit that applies to both," he said, "you can overcontrol one source and undercontrol another so that the emissions still add up to the total amount allowed from both sources." Ideally, bubbles "encourage companies to come up with innovative ways to reduce pollutants," said Ivan Tether of EPA's Washington-based Regulatory Reform staff. Bubbles also allow companies to save substantial amounts of money since plant managers and other officials can determine, within applicable guidelines, which emissions to control. The bubble approach assumes that a plant is covered by an imaginary bubble, or dome, with only one smokestack emitting airborne pollutants. As long as the area of the bubble meets overall air quality standards, plant managers can have discretion over which individual stacks to control. Emissions trades must involve pollution sources that are geographically close enough to produce the same or better air quality in the bubble area. Pollutants eligible for trading are total suspended particulates (TSP), volatile organic compounds (VOC), sulfur dioxide (S02), nitrogen dioxide(N02), and carbon monoxide (CO). Bubbles can apply to multiple pollution sources within one plant or to several plants in an area. In any case, trades must involve the same pollutant. For example: Two plants in an area have to reduce their pollution from a source by 80 percent, but Company A 24 ------- finds it cost-effective to reduce it by 90 percent, thereby gaining a 10 percent surplus reduction. Company B, however, can only afford to reduce its pollution by 70 percent and needs a credit. Company A could then sell its credit to Company B, with the air quality in the area remaining the same. One of the first bubbles to be approved in the Nation was in 1981 at Armco Steel, in Middletown, Ohio. That plan, involving total suspended particulates (or dust), allowed the company to clean up dust and airborne dirt from the plant grounds instead of installing sophisticated secondary control systems on various hot-metal handling processes, Paisie said. The company invested S6 million in dust control by paving roads and spraying water on coal and ore piles, among other things. Implementing these controls showed that "significant improvements in ambient air quality are possible with a comprehensive fugitive-dust control program," according to an Armco report. The report also noted that these improvements cost less than controls on fugitive emissions from process areas of the plant. Although the bubble approach is a good pollution control tool in some areas, its use in Region 5 is restricted to areas that have met the Clean Air Act standards for healthy air, or have defined how and when they are going to meet the standards. There are 12 approved bubbles in the Region, with many more in vaying stages of review at State environmental agencies or EPA. As a rule, EPA's regie- regional Air Management Division staff must review any bubble proposal in the Region. Two States, Illinois and Indiana, have applied for permission to create a generic-rule approach to BUBBLES IN REGION 5 State Indiana Michigan Minnesota Ohio Type of Bubble TSP— Averaging controls of gram- handling process fugitives TSP — Trade between coal-fired boilers S02 — Trade sulfur recovery for oil-fired boiler VOC — Trade between paper coating lines TSP — Trade between electric furnace for process controls TSP — Trade between furnaces and fiberglass wool-forming lines TSP — Trade sintering for fugitive process controls TSP — Trade among four coal-fired boilers VOC — Extend compliance schedule for eight vinyl coated lines Company and Location Farm Bureau Coop Beach Grove Dow Chemical Midland Koch Refining Pine Bend Fasson-Avery Corp Pamesville ARMCO Steel Middletown Owens-Corning Newark Republic Steel Youngstown Toledo Edison Oregon B.F. Goodrich Marietta reviewing bubbles. If EPA allows use of the rule in those States, then the Agency would not have to review each individual bubble application. Use of the generic rule can speed approvals, increase certainty, and expand trading opportunities by authorizing States to approve individual transactions without a Federal case-by-case review. To clarify and streamline EPA bubble policy, the Agency is about to come out with an emissions trading policy that will specify the conditions under which emissions trading can be done. The policy will specifically address the circumstances under which bubbles can be used in areas that have not met Clean Air Act standards. 25 ------- Enforcement Summary The Region 5 air enforcement effort accounts for about half of all air-related litigation referrals from EPA's 10 regional offices. A brief summary of some of the 34 lawsuits filed on behalf of Region 5 follows: PRINTPAK. INC., Elgin, III. EPA sued Printpak, a flexible packaging manufacturer and printer, in March 1984 for violating the Clean Air Act. The suit alleges that the company emits approximately 250 tons of uncontrolled volatile organic compounds (VOC's) into the air of Kane County, III., each year. Printpak was required by the State of Illinois to reduce these emissions to 133 tons per year or less by Dec. 31, 1982. EPA wants the company to comply with a schedule for adding pollution control equipment or to reformulate its coatings to comply with Illinois air pollution regulations, which are enforceable under the Clean Air Act. The Agency is also seeking monetary penalties. VOC's contribute to the formation of ozone, a pervasive air pollutant that can cause health problems in humans. Kane County is one of six counties in northeastern Illinois that do not meet the ozone standards necessary to protect health. DIETZGEN CORP., Des Plaines, III. The Dietzgen Corp. was sued in January 1984 for violating the Clean Air Act. The company is a paper coater which uses VOC's to manufacture drafting paper, film, vellum, and transparencies. It emits more than 81 tons of VOC's each year, despite an Illinois requirement that it reduce those emissions to less than 23.6 tons per year by Dec. 31,1982. To do that, the company must install control equipment or reformulate their coatings to emit less VOC's. Des Plaines is in the northeastern Illinois nonattainment area for ozone. EPA is asking the court to require the company to reduce their emissions to acceptable levels and to pay a monetary penalty. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP., Chicago. EPA is suing the company for violating a 1980 consent order requiring the company to install pollution control devices at the blast furnace cast house of its Chicago plant. Republic installed technology to minimize the emissions from the cast house, but the equipment did not effectively reduce emissions or meet the requirements of the order. EPA is therefore seeking almost $3 million in penalties from the company, along with any other penalties as they accrue. THE STATE OF OHIO. EPA has filed ; contempt action against the State and its departments of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Youth Services for violating provisions of a consent judgment signed in 1981. The consent judgment required the State of Ohio tc bring 23 facilities into compliance wit! the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) for paniculate matter emissions and opacity. Nine of the 23 facilities are still violating the SIP, and EPA seeks an amended court order requiring immediate compliance with the SIP and the payment of fines for past and future violations. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., Burns Harbor, Ind. EPA filed suit in 1 982 to prevent the company from operating several of its facilities in violation of the Clean Air Act. The company was cited for violating particulate and opacity standards. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP., Cleveland, Ohio. EPA has sued the company for operating four blast furnaces in violation of the Clean Air Act and Ohio environmental regulations EPA contends that the company has been emitting excess particulates since 1978 and is asking that Republic be prevented from operating the furnaces in violation of clean air standards. EPA also seeks the expeditious installation of necessary air pollution control equipment, along with fines for the time during which the furnaces did not comply with environmental regulations. 26 ------- REPUBLIC STEEL CORP., Warren, Ohio. EPA is suing Republic for violating a 1979 consent order. The company agreed in 1 979 to reduce the sulfur content of its coke oven gas and installed desulfurization equipment to do so. However, that equipment has not enabled the company to reduce the sulfur content to the level specified in the consent agreement. EPA is seeking an injunction to prevent further violations, along with an order requiring expeditious compliance with the consent decree and civil penalties of $7,500 per day that Republic failed to comply with the decree. In another action concerning the Warren mill, EPA has filed a contempt action against Republic for failing to construct and operate a wastewater treatment plant by Dec. 31,1 981, to handle all process water from the new coke battery and the excess crude ammonia liquor from the Youngstown coke batteries. The company agreed in 1 979 to reduce air emissions from the Warren coke quenching station by building the wastewater treatment plant. The plant was never built. MID-STATES TERMINALS, INC., Toledo, Ohio. EPA is suing the company for excess fugitive dust emissions from its Toledo grain shiploading facility. EPA contends that the company violates Ohio environmental regulations and the Clean Air Act. The suit was filed in 1 980, and both parties are now preparing for trial. YOUNGSTOWN THERMAL CORP., Youngstown, Ohio. EPA filed a civil suit against the company in February, 1 983, to remedy longstanding violations of the Clean Air Act. Youngstown Thermal and the previous owner of its North Avenue steam- heating plant were operating the plant so that four coal-fired boilers exceeded allowable particulate emission limitations by hundreds of tons each year. Youngstown Thermal agreed several years ago to install particulate controls on three of the boilers by June 1982. The company subsequently notified EPA that it could not install the equipment on time due to financial difficulties. EPA is seeking an injunction to prevent operation of the boilers without the proper pollution controls and is asking for civil penalties, yy 27 ------- For Further Information If you would like additional information about specific EPA programs, please visit the Office of Public Affairs, U.S Environmental Protection Agency Region 5, 230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, or call (312)353-2072. This office maintains a supply of EPA publications, operates an informal speakers' bureau and coordinates regional distribution of environmental films. There is no charge to the public for these services If you encounter an environmental problem, report it first to your local, and then your state, pollution control agency Those numbers are listed below For specific information about EPA programs call- U.S.EPA Region 5 (312) 353-2000 Air Pollution (312) 353-221 2 Automobile Problems Catalytic Converters (202) 382-2640 Certifying a Car for Sale (313)668-4277 Fuel Economy (313) 668-4329 Fuel Switching (312)886-4577 Imports (312) 886-6082 Tampering with Emission Controls (202) 383-2640 Warranty & After-Market Parts (202) 382-2940 Great Lakes National Program Office (312)353-2117 Hazardous Waste, Super Fund (312) 353-9733 Oil & Chemical Spills National Emergency Response Center (800) 424-8802 Region 5 Emergency Response Center (312)353-2318 Pesticides (312)353-2192 Radiation (312) 886-6175 Toxic Substances (312) 886-6006 Water Qaulity Wastewater Treatment . (312)353-2121 Drinking Water (312) 353-2650 Wetlands (312) 886-6678 Region 5 ENVIRONMENTAL HOTLINE: Illinois residents call: 800-572-2515 U.S. Environmental ProtectlcW fl||BHUjfes: soo-621-8431 Region V. Library 230 South Dearborn Street .Chicago, Illinois 60604 ILLINOIS Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 2200 Churchill Road Springfield, IL 62706 (217)782-5562 24-hour number (217)782-3637 INDIANA Indiana State Board of Health 1330 W. Michigan Street Indianapolis, IN 46206 (317)633-0100 24-hour number: (317)633-0144 MICHIGAN Michigan Department of Natural Resources Stevens T. Mason Building Lansing, Ml 48909 (517)373-1220 24-hour numbers (517)373-7660 (800) 292-4706 MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1935 W. County Rd. B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 (612)296-7373 24-hour number (612)296-7373 OHIO Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 361 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 43215 (615)466-8508 24-hour number, (within Ohio only) (800)282-9378 WISCONSIN Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources PO Box 7921 Madison, Wl 53707 (608)266-2621 Now Available: Report on the Environment 1983, Region V. Contact the Office of Public Affairs for a free copy. 28 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1984-554-25 ------- ------- United States Environmental Protecion Agency Region 5 230 S Dearborn St Chicago, IL 60604 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 00 THIRD CLASS BULK RATE Postage and Fees Paid EPA Permit No G-35 ------- |