vvEPA
            United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
                           Health Effects Research
                           Laboratory
                           Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-600/1-78-053
August 1978
            Research and Development
               Biological  Indicator
               of Summational
               Exposures to  Lead

               Tooth  Lead
               in  Children Living
               in  Cleveland  and its
               Suburbs
\
\
 EP 600/1
 78-053

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and  application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping  was  consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental  Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental  Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental  Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS RE-
SEARCH series. This series describes projects and studies relating to the toler-
ances of man for unhealthful substances or conditions. This work is generally
assessed from a medical viewpoint, including physiological or psychological
studies. In addition to toxicology and other medical specialities, study areas in-
clude biomedical  instrumentation and health research techniques utilizing ani-
mals — but always with  intended application to human health measures.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                             EPA-600/1-78-053
                                             August 1978
   BIOLOGICAL INDICATOR OF SUMMATIONAL EXPOSURES TO LEAD

Tooth Lead in Children Living in Cleveland and Its Suburbs
                             by

          Margaret A. Kelsall and Ruth E. Hunter
                  Laboratory of Cytology
 Ohio Mental Health and Mental  Retardation Research Center
                     1708 Aiken Avenue
                      Columbus, Ohio
                    Grant No. R-804632
                      Project Officer

                      Warren A.  Galke
                Population Studies Division
            Health Effects Research Laboratory
            Research Triangle Park, N.C.  27711
           U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
            HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
            RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. 27711

-------
                            DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                n

-------
                                FOREWORD
     The many benefits of our modern, developing, industrial society
are accompanied by certain hazards.  Careful assessment of the relative
risk of existing and new man-made environmental hazards is necessary
for the establishment of sound regulatory policy.  These regulations
serve to enhance the quality of our environment in order to promote the
public health and welfare and the productive capacity of our Nation's
population.

     The Health Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park,
conducts a coordinated environmental health research program in toxicology,
epidemiology, and clinical studies using human volunteer subjects.
These studies address problems in air pollution, non-ionizing
radiation, environmental carcinogenesis and the toxicology of pesticides
as well as other chemical pollutants.  The Laboratory participates in
the development and revision of air quality criteria documents on
pollutants for which national ambient air quality standards exist or
are proposed, provides the data for registration of new pesticides or
proposed suspension of those already in use, conducts research on
hazardous and toxic materials, and is primarily responsible for providing
the health basis for non-ionizing radiation standards.   Direct support
to the regulatory function of the Agency is provided in the form of
expert testimony and preparation of affidavits as well  as expert advice
to the Administrator to assure the adequacy of health care and surveillance
of persons having suffered imminent and substantial endangerment of
their health.

     Lead is a toxic material which is present throughout the environment.
As such it is important to know which if any people have absorbed it into
their bodies.  This report covers an epidemiologic study of the geographic
distribution of lead absorption in the Cleveland Metropolitan area by
measuring the amount of lead in the shed baby teeth of children.   The
study also related levels of lead in teeth to various environmental
sources of lead.
                                   F. G.  Hueter, Ph.  D.
                                     Acting Director,
                           Health Effects Research Laboratory
                                   m

-------
                               CONTENTS



Preface and Acknowl edgments	  i v



Summary	  vi i i



Figures	  Xiii



Tables	  xiv



     1.    Introduction	  1



     2.    Methods	  5



               Field methodology of lead absorption study	  5



               Data gathered for lead absorption study	  6



               Field methodology for behavioral study	  13



               Map of schools and air stations	  15



     3.    Results	  16



               Demographic variables	  16



               Lead absorption study	  20



               Neurological effects of lead	  41



     4.    Discussion	  47



               Summary of results	  47



               Implications of results and recommendations	  52



References	  54



Sources of Data	  57



Form Used for Teacher Evaluations	  58



Tables	  59-147
                                IV

-------
                        PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS




    The Health Effects Research Laboratory of the United States Environmental




Protection Agency awarded the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Mental




Retardation a grant to analyze data it had accumulated on tooth lead levels in




the Cleveland Metropolitan area.  This study was to examine the geographical




distribution of tooth lead, its environmental sources, and its behavioral




effects.  During the six-month period of the grant, Mrs. Ruth E. Hunter and




Dr. Margaret A. Kelsall collected and organized data on race, vehicle traffic,




industry, mean income, and air pollution levels.




     The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation sponsored the




research for the previous four-year period.  The quantitation of lead in shed




or extracted teeth of 11,241 children who attended 254 elementary schools




in Cuyahoga County or who were treated at dental clinics and institutions;




determination of the percent lifespan of residency; tabulations by teachers of



children's school behavior in 52 schools; and other aspects of this report




were done during the years the research was sponsored by the Ohio Department




of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.




     The cooperation of Mrs. Conella Coulter Brown and Mr. L. Barrett Smith




of the Cleveland Board of Education enabled us to distribute the parent con-




sent slips to obtain the tooth samples of children in the Cleveland Public




Schools and to distribute and collect the teacher evaluation sheets.  Public




school systems which cooperated included the following:  Cleveland Public,




Parma, Williamsfield, Rocky River, Brooklyn, Brecksville, Garfield Heights,

-------
Cuyahoga Heights, Maple Heights, Euclid, Lodi, Olmstead Falls,  Lakewood, and




Cleveland Heights/University Heights.  The County Board of Retardation also




assisted in collection of tooth samples.  Dr.  James Fintz of the Catholic




School system and Dr. E. F. Sagehorn of the Lutheran School system also




cooperated in the distribution of information and collection of samples.




     The progress of this research was facilitated by the cooperation of




dentists in Cleveland.  The Cleveland Dental Association passed a resolution




supporting the work and volunteered assistance.  Eugene Rosewater, D.D.S;




Anthony J. Tomaro, D.D.S, of The Dental Clinic at Metropolitan General




Hospital; Daniel Verne, D.D.S, of Mt. Sinai Hospital and the dental clinics




at St. Lukes and Babies and Children's Hospitals cooperated by providing the




samples of extracted teeth.  Earl Willhoit, D.D.S., and Richard Smithy D.D.S.,




at Cleveland Psychiatric Institute gave us information pertaining to techni-




que and equipment and also provided samples of extracted teeth.  Howard




Kessler, D.D.S., encouraged and helped us by providing a collection center




for shed teeth from children in the schools of the Cleveland Public School




System.  Dr. David Scott of Case Western Reserve Dental School gave advice on




information useful in dental research.




     A number of organizations also assisted in presenting our program to




parents.  The Cuyahoga County PTA included a notice of the project in a news-




letter to its chapters in the County.  The Cleveland PTA assisted in the




distribution of forms requiring the signatures of parents and the information




on children.  Nurses of the Cuyahoga County Board of Health informed parents





                                      vi

-------
of the need for lead tests.



     The press, TV and radio stations, and a number of organizations assisted



in presenting our program to parents.  This assistance by the media provided



the public with information on the value of lead analysis of the teeth and



resulted in a well-distributed geographical response.   The



Cleveland Plain Dealer ran a full page article by Paula Slimak describing the



purpose and value of the research on tooth lead.  The Cleveland Press also



printed articles on the value of testing baby teeth for lead.  TV stations



WUAB and WKBF interviewed Mrs. Hunter and gave her the opportunity to describe



the purposes of the research and the value of lead analysis of teeth.  Radio



Station WCLV gave Mrs. Hunter air time to inform the public.



     Specialized maps were required for determining the location of the



schools, housing risks, vehicle traffic, the socio-economic factors and other



variables.  Mr. C. J. Thoren of the Maps Department of the U.S. Department of



Commerce, The Cleveland City Planning Commission, Cleveland Growth Board,



Regional Planning Board, Northeastern Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency, and



the Office of the Cuyahoga County Engineer were most helpful by providing



large scale maps designed for the special aspects of housing, census tracts



and other information.



     The following individuals and hospital groups donated their services for



collecting blood samples of suburban children who had elevated tooth lead:



Dr. Robert Marshall of Lakewood Hospital, Mr. James Meyer and Mrs. Patricia



Moore of Parma Community Hospital, and Miss Maryann Harvan, Mrs. Barbara Ryan





                                     vii

-------
and Mrs. Barbara Ryba of Suburban Hospital in Warrensville Heights.  Dr. Gary




Davidson of the Ohio Department of Health did the blood lead analysis for the




suburban children who had elevated tooth lead.  Dr.  Jack Wilt, the Chief of




Community Hygiene, did the tests for blood lead on the Cleveland children who




had elevated tooth lead.




     Mr. Robert King and Mr. J. S. Fordyce of the NASA Lewis Research Center




provided the data on air lead, cadmium, and antimony; and Mr. George Craig of




the Air Pollution Control Board gave us the data on particulate and SC^.




Without these data and their cooperation, air variables could not have been




related to tooth lead.  Technical information was given to us by Dr. Eleanor




Berman, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.  The Ohio Environmental




Pollution Agency checked our lead standards for accuracy.  Computer analyses




were done by Dr. Thomas Holland and Mr. Aharon Fein of the Human Resources




Laboratory of Case-Western University




    We especially appreciate the assistance of Mrs.  Kathleen Polak for typing




the tables, manuscript and other assistance in the preparation of this report.
                                      VI11

-------
                                SUMMARY



     Lead in shed deciduous teeth is an indicator of the lifetime accumu-



lated absorption of lead experienced by children in response to environ-



mental exposures.  In contrast to this, lead in blood is known to be



transitory and reflects most commonly recent exposures.



     The objectives of this research were analyses of lead burdens,  as



indicated by lead in the teeth of children living in Cleveland and some



of its suburbs, in relation to geographical  location, housing, vehicle



traffic, mean income, industry, and air lead; and the assessment of



accumulated tooth lead in relation to physical, emotional  and learning



disabilities of children.



     The amount of lead in the teeth of 11,241 children  in Cleveland and



its suburbs which were located at varying radii and in all  three direc-



tions from the center of Cleveland was determined by use of atomic



absorption spectroscopy.   Tooth samples were obtained from children



enrolled in 135 elementary schools in the Cleveland public school system,



43 Catholic schools in Cleveland, 11 Lutheran schools, and 70 schools in



the suburbs.



     Mean amounts of lead in the teeth of children living in some suburbs



were as high as those for children living within the City of Cleveland.



The mean amount of lead in incisor and molar teeth of 5,333 children in



the Cleveland public school system was 5.57  ± 2.05 mg Pb/100 grams of



tissue.   The mean tooth lead for the suburbs was 5.45 mg Pb/100 g.



     The percent frequency of children who had 8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g was
                                   IX

-------
approximately the same for the Cleveland and suburban children.   Elevated




tooth lead (8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g) was present in the teeth of 13.2% (834)




of the 6,326 Cleveland children and 12.6% (460)  of the 3,653 children living




in the nine suburbs.




     The percent occurrence of children having 8.0 or more mg Pb/lOOg was




determined for each school.  The location of schools and the % occurrence of




elevated tooth lead showed the following:




    1.  The % occurrence of elevated tooth lead for schools did not follow




    a radial pattern of decrease from the center of the city to the suburbs




    and exurbs.   Schools which had the highest frequencies of elevated tooth




    lead were scattered in their geographical location throughout the City




    of Cleveland and its suburbs.




    2.  The ranges in percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead varied more




    between schools within Cleveland and within most suburbs than between the




    City of Cleveland and it suburbs or between suburbs.




     Shed crowns of incisor teeth which did not have a cavity or filling




represented 75% of the sample of the Cleveland children and 80% of the sample




bf children in the suburbs.  The frequency of elevated tooth lead (8.0 or




more mg Pb/100 g) in shed incisor teeth which did not have a cavity or




filling was 15.2% of the 3,911 children in the Cleveland public schools and




15.5% of the 2,854 children in the nine suburbs.




     Molar crowns without cavities and/or fillings comprised 17.6% of the




samples of children in the Cleveland public schools and 12.2% of the suburban




group.  The incidence of elevated lead in molar crowns without cavities and/or




fillings was 4.3% for the Cleveland group; and 3.2% for the school systems in




the nine suburbs.

-------
     Frequency distributions of the amounts of lead in shed incisor crowns




without cavities and/or fillings for the 3,911 children in the Cleveland




public schools were the following: 39% of the teeth had 0-4.9 mg Pb/100 g;




46%, 5-7.9 mg Pb; and 15.2%, 8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g.  For the 2,854 children




in the 70 suburban schools, the % frequency distribution of lead in shed




incisor crowns without cavities and/or fillings were the following:  42%




had 0-4.9 mg Pb/lOOg; 42%, 5-7.9 mg Pb; and 15.5% were in the sange of 8.0 or




more mg Pb/100 g.




     The amount of lead in incisor crown tissue of shed teeth which did not




have a cavity and/or filling decreased with the age at the time of tooth loss.




Coefficients of correlation between the amounts of lead in shed teeth and the




age at time of tooth loss were significant for each of the public and paro-




chial school systems.  Greater amounts of tooth lead in the younger children




may be due to loss of less lead during a shorter period of resorption of the




roots of the deciduous teeth.  However, the possibility that many of the




younger children were subjected to increased lead pollution during infancy and




the toddler stage should also be considered.




     The occurrence of elevated tooth lead (8.0 mg Pb/100 g) was highest in




five-year-old boys and girls.  For the 2,120 boys in the Cleveland public




schools, the incidence of elevated tooth lead decreased from 27.8% in five-




year-olds to 5.2% for the boys aged 9 through 12 years.  The incidence of




elevated tooth lead was 24.7% for five-year-old girls and decreased to 5.2%




for girls aged 9 through 12.




     A similar decrease of tooth lead with age occurred in boys and girls




living in the suburbs.  The incidence of elevated tooth lead was 26.1% for




five-year-old boys and 1.4% for boys 9 through 12 years old.  The incidence
                                      XI

-------
of elevated tooth lead was 22.2% for five-year-old girls and 2.4% for girls




9 through 12 years old.




     The percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead for children in 126 of the




Cleveland public schools was positively correlated with the number of indust-




ries within a one-half mile radius of schools in the Cleveland public school




system.  However, the percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead was not




significantly correlated with any of the following:  % pre-1950 houses in the




census tract of the school; the % white children in the school; mean income




of the census tract in which the school was located; or with the number of




vehicles passing through major intersections in a one-half mile radius of the




schools.




     Risk of obtaining lead from household paint was estimated by using the




percent of pre-1950 built houses within the census tract.   As expected, the




percent of pre-1950 built houses in the census tracts of the school was




negatively correlated with mean income for the Cleveland public and parochial




school systems.  The percent of pre-1950 built houses was positively cor-




related with lead industries for the Cleveland public and parochial schools




and also for the suburban public schools.  The number of lead industries had




significant negative correlations with mean income for all three groups of




school systems.  The percent white children in the Cleveland public schools




correlated positively with mean income.  However, the percent white children




in the suburban school systems was not significantly correlated with mean




income.  The percent white children was significantly negatively correlated




with the percent pre-1950 housing and with vehicle traffic.




     The incidence of elevated tooth lead in Cleveland public and parochial




schools was not related to air lead exposure when measured by the percent of

-------
air lead samples above 1,515 ng/m .  Furthermore, the incidence of elevated


tooth lead was not related to air particulate levels, percentage of air

                              3
cadmium levels above 19.5 ng/m , percentage of air antimony levels above 217

    3                                                 3
ng/m , or percentage tests of S0_ levels above 80 ng/m .

                                                              3
     The percent age of daily air lead levels above 1,515 ng/m  was 10% or


more for 10 to 17 Cleveland air-collecting stations.  For air station #10,

                                                   3
60% (15 of 25) of the samples were above 1,515 ng/m .  Air station #14 did


not have any of 34 samples for air lead above 1,515 ng/m .  Air cadmium data


were obtained at the same 17 air stations where the air lead was determined.


With the exception of air station #19, all air stations which had 10% or

                                                         3
more of the samples with air lead levels above 1,515 ng/m  also had 10% to

                                                                        3
24% of their samples with cadmium levels above the baseline of 19.5 ng/m .


Antimony in amounts above 217 ng/m  was present in 40% and 54% of the samples


from two air stations.  The air lead scores of percent samples above 1,515

       3
ng Pb/m  was not related to air suspended particulate, air cadmium,  or S0_;


but had a significantly negative correlation with the percent of samples for

                           3
air antimony above 217 ng/m .


     Air lead was significantly correlated with the teacher evaluation scores


of the physical and emotional symptoms, and the learning disabilities which


may be related to lead toxicity.  The significance of Pearson coefficients


of correlation between the percent of air lead samples above 1,515 ng/m


and the scores of the teacher evaluations were the following:  .028 for the


seven physical symptoms; .008 for the ten emotional characteristics; and


.019 for the seven learning disabilities.  The Spearman correlations were


also significant.

-------
                                 FIGURES




Number                                                             Page




1    Percent Elevated Tooth Lead in Suburbs and Cleveland 	  22




2    Lead in Incisor Crowns of Teeth without Cavities/Fillings .  .    24




3    Elevated Tooth Lead and Tooth Type	26




4    Frequency Distribution of Amounts of Tooth Lead 	 31




5    Age and Tooth Lead for Children in Cleveland	33




6    Age and Tooth Lead for Children in One Suburb	35








                                   MAP




     Location of Schools and Air Stations	15
                                    xiv

-------
                                   TABLES






Number                                                                   Page




1-4   Vehicle Traffic and Schools	   59




5-8   Pre-1950 Housing and Schools 	   63




9-12  Mean Income and Schools	66




13    Percent White Children and Schools	68




14    Lead Industries and Schools	.69




15    Incidence above Baselines of Air Variables	70




16    Particulate Tests of Air Collecting Stations	71




17    Percent Tests 2X Mean of Air Lead	72




18    Percent Tests 5X Mean of Air Cadmium	73




19    Percent Tests 5X Mean of Air Antimony	74




20     Mean Tooth Lead by School System	75




21     Summary of Elevated Tooth Lead	76




22-26  Frequency Distribution of Amounts of Tooth Lead	77




27-35  Lead in Shed Incisor Crowns	82




36     Tooth Lead and % Life at Residence	100




37-38  Age at Tooth Loss and Tooth Lead	102




39-40  Sex, Age and Amounts of Tooth Lead	104




41-50  Demographic and Exposure Variables of Schools	106




51-52  Housing Risk and Elevated Tooth Lead	122




53-54  Vehicle Traffic and Elevated Tooth Lead	123




55-56  Mean Income and Elevated Tooth Lead	125
                                     XV

-------
Number                                                                 Page




57-58    Correlations of Elevated Tooth Lead and Variables	126




59       Air Stations and Demographic Variables	130




60-61    Elevated Tooth Lead and Air Variables	138




62-63    Learning, Behavioral and Physical Scores 	  142




64-65    Correlations of Teacher Evaluation Scores 	 145




66       Teacher Evaluations Scores and Race	147




67-68    Correlations of Learning, Behavioral, and Physical Scores . .  . 149




69-70    Correlations of Air Variables and Teacher Evaluation Scores.  . .150




71       Teacher Evaluations in Seven Suburbs 	 152




72       Age and Teacher Evaluations in Nine Suburbs	153
                                     XVI

-------
                                  SECTION 1




                                 INTRODUCTION




     This investigation on lead in shed deciduous teeth of children includes




consideration of the period of residency, lead content of air, and evaluations




by teachers of physical, emotional and learning disabilities of their




students.  Earlier reports on tooth lead in children were based upon




very small samples of suburban children.  This study included more than




7,000 children in Cleveland and 4,000 children in 11 suburbs located at vary-




ing radii and in all three directions from the City of Cleveland.




     Our review of the literature indicated that the principal cause of lead




poisoning in children is considered to be lead based paint and that lead




poisoning was considered primarily a hazard for children living in the inner




cities.  In the design of this project, therefore, we selected for the collect-




ion of tooth samples elementary schools within the City of Cleveland and




suburban schools located at varying radii in all three directions from the



center of Cleveland.  We expected to find a higher prevalence of elevated




tooth lead in children living in the inner city than in those living in the




suburbs.  However, our observations on lead in the teeth of the first 2,500



children showed pockets of a high prevalence of elevated tooth lead in delimit-




ed areas of the suburbs.




     Since this observation showed the need for investigation of the sources




of lead in these "pockets" of the suburbs, we studied stationary source of




emissions, mobile source emissions as well as the housing risk.  The percent




                                      1

-------
of lifespan that the children lived in the house where residing when the tooth




was shed was determined for each child.  This percent lifespan of residency




enabled us to relate data on tooth lead to housing and other environmental




sources of lead pollution.  Data obtained from the survey of atmospheric




pollutants made by NASA for air collecting stations in the City of Cleveland




during August 1971 to August 1972 permitted us to relate tooth lead to atmos-




pheric lead, cadmium, and antimony.  The Cleveland Air Pollution Center gave




us the data on air particulate and SCL from 1971-1972.




     Teacher evaluations of student characteristics were used to determine




possible effects of accumulated lead on children in 24 schools in Cleveland




and 26 suburban elementary schools.  The teacher evaluations of children's




performance were rated on a tridimensional scale which included physical,




emotional, and learning disabilities.  After approximately half of the 11,241




samples of teeth from children living in Cleveland and in all of the suburbs




were analyzed, we selected those inner city and suburban schools which had




the highest prevalence of elevated tooth lead and matched these schools with




nearby schools having low prevalences of elevated tooth lead but having similar




socio-economic characteristics.  Evaluations of children by teachers at the




end of the school term is an applicable method because some of the postulated




behavioral effects of lead absorption should be recognizable in the classroom.








ACCUMULATED LEAD IN TEETH




     Lead in excess of the amount which can be eliminated accumulates in the




bones and teeth (Brudevold and Steadman, 1956).  Shed baby teeth are excellent




indicators of a child's lifetime exposure to more lead than can be eliminated.




Dentine and enamel in the teeth are not subjected to remodeling as is bone be-




cause teeth do not undergo calcification except in cases of injury (Strehlow and

-------
and Kneip, 1969).  In addition, shed deciduous teeth are readily and easily




available samples.  Tests for blood lead are useful in detecting cases of




acute lead poisoning, but do not indicate chronic cases (Herman, 1966) or




previous summated exposures (Needleman, Davidson, Sewell and Shapiro, 1974).




     In 1962, Altshuller, Halak, Landing and Kehoe showed the value of using




deciduous teeth as an index of accumulated lead.  They found that the mean




tooth lead was 15.9 mg Pb per 100 g. in six children who died of lead poison-




ing and 11.6 mg Pb per 100 g. in nine children who survived acute lead poi<;on-




ing (Altshuller, Halak, Landing and Kehoe, 1962).  Since 1972, shed and




extracted teeth have been used to determine the amounts of accumulated lead




in children in Philadelphia (Needleman, Tuncay and Shapiro, 1972); Shapiro,




Dobkin, Tuncay and Needleman, 1973), Charleston (Habercam, Reigart and Croft,




1974), and Belfast Ireland (Sewart, 1974).






BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF LEAD ABSORPTION



     Hyperactivity of children is perhaps the most difficult and prevalent




problem for teachers in elementary schools.  More than half of a group of




hyperactive children were reported to have blood lead in the upper level of




the normal range (David, Clark and Voeller, 1972).  Subclinical levels of




lead appear to produce short and long term effects on behavior and intelli-




gence (Bryce-Smith, 1972).  However, indirect effects of visual motor deficit




also affect learning and may aggrevate hyperactivity.  Werry (1968) states




that visual motor deficits are probably more directly responsible for learn-




ing disorders than hyperactivity or attention deficits.  Hyperactive children




frequently have visual motor deficits which cause poor handwriting and inter-




fere with school work and participation in activities in the schoolroom




(Laufer, Denhoff and Solomons, 1957).

-------
     Visual motor deficits were a permanent residual effect of lead poisoning




in all cases studied by Bradley and Baungartner (1958).   Chelation treatments




used for removal of lead may differ in improvement of visual motor function.




Bradley and Baungartner (1958) found that use of EDTA produced better improve-




ment in visual motor tests than BAL.  De laBurde and Choate (1972) state that many




lead-poisoned children who do not have clinical signs of encephalopathy show




subtle signs of brain injury on later evaluations.  Behavioral and visual-




motor effects were the most frequent effects of lead poisoning and were




present in many individuals who had normal intelligence (De laBurde and Choate,




1972).   Bryce-Smith (1972) states that supposedly "acceptable" exposures to




lead may be associated with adverse behavioral effects.

-------
                                 SECTION 2
                                  METHODS

FIELD METHODOLOGY OF LEAD ABSORPTION STUDY
Sample Frame

     The sample frame for collection of tooth samples was elementary schools
and special institutions in Cuyahoga County of Ohio.  Children in both the
public and parochial elementary schools in Cleveland and in the public and
parochial schools in the suburbs lived in the immediate area of their
elementary schools.  Response to the initial request for participation result-
ed in the collection of teeth from 11,241 children.  Since the Department of
Mental Health and Mental Retardation of Ohio advised us not to collect addi-
tional samples, follow-up of the first request was not done in order to
increase the response rate.
     Within the context of Cuyahoga County, children were divided into three
major categories:  a) Cleveland School System, b) Suburban School Systems,
and c) Special Institutions.  Within the City of Cleveland, the first major
breakdown was the Cleveland public schools and the parochial schools. Parents
of children in 135 elementary schools in the Cleveland public school system
sent in the shed baby teeth of their children.  Parochial schools included 42
elementary schools in the Roman Catholic school system in the City of
Cleveland, and 11 Lutheran schools in Cleveland and the suburbs.   Suburbs
were selected to include those located at varying radii in all directions

-------
from the center of Cleveland.   The total number of public elementary schools




was 70 for all of the suburban school systems.   Six exurban schools were also



included.




     Special institutions included six dental clinics, three institutions of




the Ohio Department of Mental  Health and Mental Retardation, and institutions




for children with special disabilities.  Three of the dental clinics were




located on the east side of the Cuyahoga River; and three, on the west side.






Collection of Samples




     Parental permission slips and envelopes for enclosing the shed tooth were




distributed by school systems  through classrooms of elementary schools to the




parents.  When the child lost  a tooth, the parent signed the parental permis-




sion slip for lead analysis and supplied the information requested (name, age,




sex, twin, address, number and age of siblings, birthplace, and number of




years of residency at current  address).  Children deposited the envelopes




which contained the shed tooth, signed slip, and information in collection




boxes at the schools.  Periodically, schools sent these envelopes to a central




collection center for the school system.






DATA GATHERED FOR LEAD ABSORPTION STUDY




Information Obtained From Parents






     Information on children included age and sex because preliminary analysis




indicated that elevated tooth lead was present in more teeth of five-year-olds




than in the teeth shed by older children.  Sex is a variable in relation to




maturational development and the incidence of pica.  The number and age of




younger siblings is a variable of socio-demographic significance.  Information




on younger siblings was also obtained to provide a means for follow-up blood




                                      6

-------
tests for younger siblings of the children who had elevated tooth lead.


     The percent lifespan of residency was determined for each child by


using the age of the child and the period of residency at address where


living when the tooth was shed or extracted.  The period of residency of


children who lived 80% to 100% of their life at an address was related to


environmental factors because tooth lead represents lifetime exposure to


more lead than can be eliminated.  In contrast, blood lead levels fluctuate

                                                        (
daily and hair lead levels fluctuate monthly.




Tooth Lead



Preparation and Analysis of Samples—


     Each tooth was in an envelope with the consent slip signed by the parent


and the information on the children.  This information was recorded according


to identification of the tooth, presence or absence of cavities and/or fill-


ings, and by school system, school, and individual child.


     Precautions to exclude contamination of the tooth sample by extraneous


lead began by staining the plaque on the tooth.  The tooth was then placed


into triple distilled water containing pumice and sonic cleaned.  This clean-


ing step was followed by hand cleaning done by using a hand dental piece and


appropriate tips to eliminate debri on the surface and in crevices of the


teeth.  All fillings and cavities were cut or drilled out.  Only tooth enamel


and dentine were used for the sample.


     The sample was cut and weighed, placed into a crucible  which was capped


and ashed in a muffle furnace below 500° C to eliminate the organic compon-

-------
ents.  The ash was picked up in concentrated nitric and perchloric acid.   The




crucible and its cap were rinsed with acid solution.   The sample was wet




digested for 24 hours; then diluted to a 10% solution with deionized distilled




water for aspiration into the flame of the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer




(AAS) (Harrison, Yurachek and Benson, 1969).  The samples were warmed just




enough in a water bath to put the supersaturated material into solution,




Vortex mixed, and then aspirated into the AAS.




Quality Control Considerations--




     To keep out contaminants, filters were placed on air vents of the




laboratory rooms used in preparing the tooth samples.  The windows were seal-




ed.  This room was used only for tooth preparations.   No smoking was permitt-




ed.  Teflon hand tools and diamond cutting tools were used.  Since eentrifug-




ing causes loss of lead in the residue, this step was eliminated.  All samples




were in solution when run on the AAS.  Each sample was run in duplicate and




rerun if indicated.




     All steps of tooth preparation (cleaning, cutting, weighing, wet ashing,




and spectroscopy) were done by random sampling.  Each run contained samples




of boys and girls of various ages and of children enrolled in different




public and private, Cleveland and suburban school systems.  This random




sampling was used at all steps to reduce variations of technicians and the




testing procedure by distribution throughout the analysis of the total tooth




sample.  Fisher Standards were used.  All chemicals were ACS Reagents. Nitric




acid had .00001% Pb; perchloric acid had .0001% Pb.  Our standards were




checked by laboratories specializing in quantitative analyses of trace




elements and toxic metals.

-------
Traffic Density Score






     The vehicle traffic or HWAY score represents the total number of




vehicles passing through the major intersections within a one-half mile




radius of a school during one 12-hour period from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on one




of the five work days of weeks in June, July or August in the years from 1957




to 1970 inclusive.




Source of Data--




     The source of data for the HWAY score was the following:  "Traffic at




Major Road Intersections in Order of Total Vehicles during the 12-hour




Period 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM.  Revised to include 1970 Counts.  Published, 1971,




Albert S. Porter, P.E., Cuyahoga County Engineer, 1928 Standard Building,




Cleveland, Ohio  44113".




     There were 31 pages in the combined report and two sets of figures.  The




first list consisted of 768 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga County during




the period of 1968, 1969, and 1970.  The second list consisted of the inter-




sections on which vehicle counts were made during the period from 1957 to




1967 inclusive.  These two lists contained 1,050 of the busiest intersections




in Cleveland, its suburbs and other parts of Cuyahoga County.  The number  of




vehicles passing through the intersections during a 12-hour period ranged  from




85,596 to 200 vehicles for the 1,050 intersections.




Determination of Traffic Density Score--




     All intersections in the above lists were located on maps for each of




the public and parochial elementary schools included in this study.   The exact




number of vehicles passing through the intersections during the 12-hour period




was recorded on tabs placed on the intersections.  A one-half mile radius




around each elementary school was the area included in determining the HWAY



                                      9

-------
score.  The total number of vehicles passing through all intersections within




the one-half mile radius of each elementary school was determined.   This




number was rounded off to the nearest 100 after the total number of vehicles




in the one-half mile radius was determined.  This number was the HWAY score.




A "0" score was given to those schools which did not contain a single inter-




section in the list of the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga  County.






Housing Risk Score






Source of Data--




    The census tracts in which elementary schools were located were the basis




for obtaining information on housing risks and mean income.   The map used to




identify the census tracts was the following: "Map Compiled, Published and




Copyrighted by Commercial Survey Company Map Publishers and Designers, 203




Caxton Building, 812 Huron Road, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115".  The source of in-




formation for housing and income was the following: "Census Tracts, Cleveland,




Ohio, Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area", U.S. Bureau of the Census




Population and Housing:  1970 Census Tracts.  Final Report (PHC (l)-45)




Cleveland, Ohio, SMSA.  After elementary schools were located on the exact




area of city blocks on the map showing census tracts, the census tract numbers




were recorded for each school.




Determination of Housing Risk Score--




     The housing risk  (HRISK) score for schools was the percent of year-round




constructed before 1950 for the census tract in which the schools were




located.  Tables H-2 "Structural, Equipment, and Financial Characteristics of




Housing Units:  1970" in the PHC (l)-45 article listed above were used to




determine HRISK scores.






                                      10

-------
     The number under the heading "Number Year-Round Housing Units" was




recorded for each school.  The number of housing units built in 1939 or




earlier was recorded for each school.  The number of housing units built




during 1940-1949 was also recorded for each school.   The number of units built




before 1939 was added to the number built during the period from 1940-1949.




This sum was divided by the number of all-year-round housing units to deter-




mine the percent of housing constructed prior to 1950.  Percent figures were




rounded off to the nearest whole number; for example, 80.5% became 81%;




80.45%, 80%.






Income Score






     The mean income (ECON) score was the mean annual income listed for the




census.tracts in which the schools were located.  Tables P-4 "Income Charact-




eristics of the Population:  1970" in the U.S. Bureau of Census Population




and Housing:  1970 Census Tracts.  Final Report (PHC (l)-45), Cleveland, Ohio,




SMSA were used to determine the mean annual income for the census tracts.






Lead Industry Score






Source of Data--




     The industry score (IND) indicates the actual number of lead industries




within the one-half mile radius of the elementary schools.  The source for




IND scores was the following:  "1972 Directory of Ohio Manufacturers" by the




Bureau of Economic Research, Ohio Department of Development. 27th Edition.




Volume 1.
                                     11

-------
Determination of Lead Industry Score--



     Industries which use lead to process raw materials,  treat products



during the process of manufacture or otherwise use lead in manufacturing a



product were marked.  The selected industries were checked by a consultant



who corrected and verified the accuracy of the use of lead in these indust-



ries.  The addresses of the lead industries were marked on maps.   The number



of lead industries within a one-half mile radius of each of the elementary



schools was the IND score.





Air Pollution Levels





Determination of Air Pollution Exposure--





     Air Lead.—The air lead score was the percent occurrence of  analyzed air-



lead samples which were above 1,515 nanograms of lead per cubic meter of air.



The baseline of 1,515 ng/rn^ was obtained by multiplying the mean of 757.8


    3                                3
ng/m  by two.  The mean of 757.8 ng/m  was the arithmetic mean of the 16



annual geometric means for 16 air-collecting stations in Cleveland.



     Air Cadmium.—The air cadmium score was the percent  occurrence of analyzed



air cadmium samples which were above 19.5 nanograms of cadmium per cubic meter  of



air.  The baseline of 19.5 ng/m^ was obtained by multiplying the mean of 3.9



by five.  The mean of 3.9 ng/m^ was the arithmetic mean of the 16 annual



geometric means for the 16 air-collecting stations in Cleveland.



     Air Antimony.—The air antimony score was the percent occurrence of analyz-



ed air antimony samples which were above 217 nanograms per cubic  meter of air.




The baseline of 217 ng/m^ was obtained by multiplying the mean of 43.4 ng/m



by five.  The mean of 43.4 was the arithmetic mean of the 16 annual geometric



means for the 16 air-collecting stations in Cleveland.



                                      12

-------
     Air SO;..--Data on S02 for air-collecting stations within Cleveland for




the period of August 1971 to August 1972 were obtained from Mr. George Craig




of the Air Pollution Center for the City of Cleveland.  The SC>2 score was the



percent occurrence of analyzed SO^ tests which were 80 micrograms or more




per cubic meter of air.  The baseline of 80 ^ug SO^/m^ was used because this




amount of 862 is the Federal Annual Mean Standard (Bergman, H. G. 1960.




Comments on the USEPA Development of a Sulfur Dioxide Control Strategy for the




State of Ohio).




     Air Particulate.--The air particulate score was the percent occurrence of




analyzed particulate tests which were above 125 micrograms of particulate per




cubic meter of air.  The baseline used was 125 jug/m^ which is the arithmetic




mean of the annual arithmetic means of the 20 air-collecting stations in




Cleveland.  These data were also obtained from Mr. George Craig of the




Air Pollution Center of Cleveland.








FIELD METHODOLOGY FOR BEHAVIORAL STUDY






Sample Frame






     After contacting the superintendents of each school system, teacher eval-




uation sheets (one per child) were taken to those schools which had the high-



est percent prevalence of children with elevated tooth lead levels and




to schools having the lowest prevalence.  Control schools were those which




had low prevalences and were located in a nearby area with similiar socio-




economic characteristics.  These schools were selected on the data collected




at the time one-third of the tooth samples were analyzed.
                                      13

-------
Sample Collection






     Included in the packets of the evaluation sheets was a letter to



principals of the schools advising them of the project and letters for each



teacher.  Teachers were invited to fill out an evaluation sheet for each child



in class.  No name was required, just the grade book number, age and sex of




the child, room number, and the name of the school.   Teachers evaluated their



classes at the end of the school year.  The teachers did not know if their




school or class had a high or low prevalence  of  elevated  tooth  lead.






Determination of Teacher Evaluation of Child Score






     Teacher evaluations were scored as five separate items (left-handed,



medication, physical, emotional and learning scores) for each elementary



school.  Physical characteristics included gait, convulsions, tremors of the



hand, muscular incoordination, squinting of eyes, ambidexterous, and matura-



tion lag.  Emotional evaluations included restlessness, cries easily,



aggressive behavior, impulsive, temper outbursts, emotional instability,



cruel behavior, withdrawn, bangs head, and unpopular with peers.  Learning



characteristics included regressions in writing  or drawing,  reading, and



speech; poor memory, difficulty in arithmetic; and short attention span.



     The physical evaluation score was the percent frequency of the "Yes"



response for the total seven physical measurements.   The emotional score was



the percent frequency of the total ten emotional characteristics.  The




learning score was the percent frequency of the total seven learning traits.
                                     14

-------
15

-------
                                  SECTION 3






                                    RESULTS








DEMOGRAPHIC AND EXPOSURE VARIABLES







Vehicle Traffic






     The frequency distribution of scores for vehicle traffic for the element-




ary schools is included in Tables 1-4.  The frequency distribution




for suburban  schools included the following suburbs:  Brooklyn, Cleveland




Heights, Cuyahoga Heights, Euclid, Garfield Heights, Lakewood, Maple Heights,




Parma, Parma  Heights, University Heights, Seven Hills, Rocky River, and




Olmstead Falls.  The vehicle traffic  counts for elementary schools ranged




from 0.0 to 160,000 vehicles passing  through intersections during a 12-hour




period.  The  0.0 score means that there was not a single intersection listed




among the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga County within the one-half




mile radius of the school.  It was not possible at this time for us to obtain




information on vehicle traffic through intersections not included in the




information provided by the Office of the Cuyahoga County Engineer.




     Contrary to what one might expect, almost twice as many Cleveland public




as suburban public schools were located in the center of an area having




low vehicle counts.  For example, 30% (39 of 131) of the schools in the




Cleveland public school system were in the center of a half-mile circle




which did not contain a single intersection listed amount the 1,050 busiest




intersections"in'Cuyahoga Caunfy. In  contrast, only 14.0% (10 of 71) of the




                                      16

-------
 of the   suburban public  schools were  located in this low range of vehicle




 traffic  counts.




     Higher percentages  of the Cleveland public and Roman Catholic schools




 were also  in the ranges  above 50,000 vehicles per 12-hour period.  Thirty-




 seven percent  (49 of 131) of the Cleveland public schools and 48% (20 of 42)




 Roman Catholic schools were located in the center of circles having 50,000




 or more  vehicles through intersections.  For the suburban public schools, 25%




 (17 of 69) schools were  in the range above 50,000 vehicles per 12-hour period.






 Housing  Risk






     The percent pre-1950 housing for census tracts of the Cleveland public




 and Roman  Catholic schools were much higher than that of the Lutheran and the




 suburban schools.  Frequency distributions of the percents of pre-1950 houses




 for Cleveland public, Roman Catholic, Lutheran, and suburban schools are given




 in Tables  5-8.   These tables show that 61.8% (81 of 131) of the Cleveland



public schools and 62.7% (27 of 43)  of the Roman Catholic schools in




 Cleveland  were located in census tracts in which 90% or more of the housing




units were constructed before 1950.   In the suburbs, however, only 16.17%




 of the schools were located in census tracts in which 90% or more of the



 housing  units were constructed before 1950.






 Mean Income








     The frequency distributions of  mean annual income  show that  many of the




Cleveland public and parochial  schools are located in census tracts  having low




annual incomes.  For example,  59% (77 of 131)  of the Cleveland public schools




and 40%  (17 of 43)  Roman Catholic schools in Cleveland  were located  in census




                                     17

-------
tracts with mean annual incomes of less than $10,000.   In contrast,  only two




of the 68 suburban schools (2.9%) were located in census tracts having less




than $10,000 mean income (Table 12).   Furthermore,-one of these two  suburban




schools does not represent a low-income area because it is located in a census




tract which includes many housing units for college students.  In the range




of $12,000 to $13,000 mean incomes were located 44% (30 of 68)  of the suburban




schools (Table 12).  Only 9.9% (13 of 131) Cleveland public schools  were in




this range.  None of the Lutheran schools within Cleveland were in census




tracts having less than $10,000 mean income (Table 11).






Racial Factor






     The frequency distribution of the Cleveland public schools shows that 45%




(59 of 130) schools had 0 to 10% white children and that 34% (44 of  130) had




90% to 100% white children (Table 13).  Ethnic composition of the entire




Cleveland public school system consisted of 57% black children; and  39% white




children.  The American Indian/Alaskan Native and the Asian/Pacific  Islander




groups were represented by 0.3%, and the Hispanic group included only 2.9%.




Most children in schools having low percentages of white children were black



children.




     The frequency distribution of racial composition shows that 81% of the




suburban schools had 95% to 100% white children (Table 13).  All of the public




 schools in six suburbs had 95% to 100% white children.  In the public school




systems of three suburbs,  one elementary school included in our study had less




that 95% white children.  The other schools in these three systems had 95% to




100% white children.  Five of six schools in another suburb had 95%  to 100%




 white children and 74% white children in the sixth school.   In another system





                                      18

-------
  one school had 95% white children; 6 of 11, 81% to 94% white children, and

  one had 48% white children.


  Lead Industries


       The frequency distribution of Cleveland public, parochial, and suburban

  public schools shows that 76% (54) of the 71 suburban schools were located

  in areas which did not have a single lead industry within the half-mile

  radius of the school (Table 14).   Only 21% of the Cleveland public and 29%

  of the parochial schools were surrounded by a half-mile radius which did

  not contain a single lead industry.  None of the suburban schools had an

  industry score of more than four lead industries, but 24% (32 of 133) of the

  Cleveland public schools and 23% (12 of 52) of the parochial schools had

  more than five lead industries within the one-half mile radius of the

  schools.



 Ambient Air Pollution
     Scores  for particulate, lead, cadmium, antimony, and SO,, and data used


to determine these scores are given in Tables 15-19.  The percent of the


air samples for total suspended particulate above the annual mean of 125.1
    3
yg/m  for the 20 air collecting stations ranged from 82.8% (48 of 58 tests)


for Air Station 1 to 12.2% (9 of 74 tests) for Air Station 12 (Table 16).


More than half of the analyzed samples for Air Stations 1, 9, 10, 13, 15, 17

                                            o
and 21 had particulate counts above 125 yg/m  during the year from August 1971

to August 1972.


     The percent of samples with air lead above 1,515 ng/m  was 10% or


more for 10 of 17 Cleveland air-collecting stations.  (Table 17).


For air station 10, 29% (15 of 51)  of the tests for air lead


                                      19

-------
                      3
were  above  1,515  ng/m .   Air  Station 14  did  not  have  any of  the 34 tests for


air lead  above  1,515  ng/m .


      Air  cadmium  levels were  determined  for  the  same  17  air  stations  included


in the  lead results  (Table 18).  All air stations  except 19  which  had 10% or

                                               o
more  of the tests for air lead above 1,515 ng/m  also had 10 to 24% of their

                                                 o
tests for cadmium above the baseline of  19.5 ng/m  .

                                       3
      Antimony in  amounts  above 217 ng/m   was present  in  greater than  45%


of the  samples  for two air stations  in Cleveland (Table  19).   The  occurrence


of air  lead levels above  1,515 ng was only 3%  (1 of 33)  for  air station 13,


which had a 54.5% (18 of  33 tests) above 217 ng  Sb/m3.
LEAD ABSORPTION STUDY




Tooth Lead Levels


All Tooth Types—


     The mean of lead  in incisor and molar teeth of 5,333 children  in  the


Cleveland public school system was 5.57 + 2.05 mg/100 g of tissue (Table 20).


The means of tooth lead for 3,704 children in nine suburbs ranged from a


low of 4.70 + 1.78 mg/100 g for 386 children in an eastern suburb to a high


of 6.54 + 2.54 for 134 children in a western suburb.   These means for Cleveland


and also for its suburbs are approximately the same as those reported by


Needleman, Tuncay and Shapiro (1972) for 69 children in the "lead belt"


of Philadelphia.  Needleman and coworkers found 51.1 + 10.9 ppm for the 69


children in the "lead belt" of Philadelphia.         -


     The means of tooth lead of the 3,704 children in all nine suburbs of


Cleveland were considerably higher than the mean of 11.1 + 14.8 mg/100 g reported
                                      20

-------
 by Needleman and coworkers  for 40 teeth from children living in a suburb of




 Philadelphia.   However,  our means of  4.70  + 1.78  mg to 6.54+2.54 mg/lOOg




 fall within  the range  reported by Needleman,  Davidson, Sewall and Shapiro




 (1974)  for white children living in newer  houses.   This mean of 41.7 ppm for




 lead in 304  white children  was based  upon  samples of dentine tissue only.  Our




 samples included enamel  as  well as dentine (Table 20).




     The percentages of children who  had 8.0 or more mg/100 g of tooth tissue




 also show that  children  living in the Cleveland suburbs are exposed to as




 much lead as are children living within the City  of Cleveland.   Elevated tooth




 lead of 8.0  or  more  ppm  was present in the teeth  of 13.0%  (824)  of the 6,326




 Cleveland children and 12.6% (460) of the  3,653 children living in nine suburbs




 (Table  21),  (Figure  1).




     Comparisons of the prevalence of elevated tooth lead (8.0 or more mg/100 g)




among school systems show that school systems in some  suburbs had a higher




prevalence of elevated lead than did children in the Cleveland public school




system  (Table 21).  For example, 13.3%  (712) of the 5,367 children in Cleveland




public  schools had 8.0 or more mg/100 g of tooth tissue.  For 134 children in one




suburb, the  prevalence of elevated tooth lead was  27.6%.  For 330 children in




another suburb,  the prevalence was 17.3% (Table 21).



     The locations of  suburbs  and the prevalence  of elevated tooth lead were




 not related  to  their distance  from the inner  city or to the location of the




 suburban area.   For  example, a suburb on the  east  side had  the  lowest  preva-




 lence of elevated lead,  5.2% or 20 of the  386 children.  Furthermore,  15.8%




 or  28 of the 177 children living in the exurbs  had  8.0 or more  mg/100  g of




 tooth tissue.   The prevalence  of elevated  lead  was  21.8% for the hospital




 group.   Many of the  teeth from children in the  hospital group,  however,
                                       21

-------


1 1 1 1







1
!> O)
0 -
t— 1 to
u
I
| | ! J | [ j | j | [ w oo

00
vt
r-<
	 O
«x. >*.»»* ""^ -^. ,.
0
to
	 ' 	 n
IO
TH
CM
•H
00
C
>r children livi
(H
/•"»
1
o
OO
v_^
1
i— (
O
o
+J
r-H
(U
O
1
H
d
o
•H
•s
13
i-H
0)
I-H
O
-0
0)
§
•g
,3
I/)
iH
iH
rt
o
0
urrenc
u
o
0
o\°
rt
•P
O
1
suburbs
                                                                                           0>
                                                                                           O-

<*>
O
to
10
                                                                 If)
                                                                                           4)
                                                                                           P-
                                                                                                  V
                                                                                                 iH
                                                                                                 O
 00
• H
 4>
                                           22

-------
 were extracted molar teeth.

 Incisor and Molars (mean and elevated)

 Shed and Incisor Crowns--
      All teeth collected from the school systems were shed deciduous teeth.
 The use of incisor crowns for lead analyses was approximately the same for
 the three school systems in Cleveland and the nine suburbs listed  in Tables
 22 to 25.  Incisor crowns without cavities or fillings comprise 75% (3,911)
 of the 5,203 teeth of children in the Cleveland public schools; 75% (620)
 of the 828 teeth of children in the Catholic schools; 73% of the 114 teeth
 in the Lutheran group; and 80% (2,854) of the 3,577 teeth from children in
 the suburban group.
      Flevatec tooth lead in incisor crowns of shed deciduous teeth which
did not have cavities or fillings also show that children living in the
suburbs of Cleveland are exposed to excess lead.  The incidence of ele-
vated tooth lead was 15.2% for the 3,911 Cleveland children and 15.5% for
the 2,854 children in the nine suburbs (Tables 22-25, Figure 2).

 Molar Crowns--
      Molar crowns of teeth which did not have cavities or fillings comprised
 17.6% (914)  of the teeth of the children in the Cleveland public schools;
 17.5% (145)  of the Catholic group;  18.4% (21) of the Lutheran group;  and
 12.2% (435)  of the suburban group.   The  prevalence of elevated  tooth  lead
 in molar crowns without cavities or fillings for the Cleveland public
 schools was  4.3%; for the Catholic schools, 6.9%;  for the Lutheran schools,
 14.3%;  and for the suburban schools, 3.2% (Tables  22-25).
      The frequency of  elevated  tooth lead was higher in molar  crowns  of
                                     23

-------
rH  C
 O  fl>
 O  r<
,^t  T^
 O  rH
CO  -H

 c  o

43  *st"

 *$

 3  eg"
 in
rH
 O  C
 O  O
43  fn
 O  T3
CO  rH
    •H
 O  43
•H  O
rH
 O  O
43  CM
4->  vO
 rt
                                                                                                          +
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         oo
                                                                                                         CTi  bo
                                                                                                           •  o
                                                                                                         r-.  o
                                                                                                          I  rH
                                                                                                         LO  ^»
                                                                                                             60
                                                                                                          I
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                          +
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         oo
                                                                                                         a\   bo
                                                                                                           •  o
                                                                                                         t^  o
                                                                                                           I  1— I
                                                                                                         LO  "^
                                                                                                             X3
                                                                                                             a.

                                                                                                         01   bo
                                                                                                          i
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                  •H





                                                                                                  •P
                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                   I/)
                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                   r<
                                                                                                   (J
                                                                                                                    •H
                                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                                     d>
                                                                                                   (1)
                                                                                                   tn
                                                                                                                    43
                                                                                                                    •P
                                                                                                                    •3
 O
 o
 o
 o
• H
O.  U
 o> to

 0)
t-t
u
       0\°
       LO
0\°
O
                             0\<»
                             LO
                             to
o\°
O
                                                   LO
                                                   CM
                                            O
                                            CM
o\°
Lf>
0\°
O
                                                      0\°
                                                      LO
                                                                                                          +
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         oo
                                                                                       r^  o
                                                                                        i  o
                                                                                       LO  rH
                                                                                                        -  I
                                                                                                         o
                                0\°
                                o
                                                                                                                     <4H  bO
                                                                                                                     o  c
                                                                                                                        •H
                                                                                                                     Q) rH
                                                                                                                     O i-H
                                                                                                                     (3 -H
                                                                                                                     0) MH
                                                                                                                     fH
                                                                                                                     fn  f-i
                                                                                                                     3  O

                                                                                                                     8  X
                                                                                                                     O +J
                                                                                                                        •H
                                                                                                                     P  >
                                                                                                                     C  rt
                                                                                                                     0)  U
                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                     fn  rt
                                                                                                                     flj
                                                                                                                     (X  (U

                                                                                                                         oj
                                                                                                                        43
                                                                                                  CM

                                                                                                   Q)

                                                                                                                        •P
                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                         C
                                 •H  -H
                                 PU  T)
                                                                 24

-------
teeth which had a cavity and/or fillings than in molar crowns of teeth which




did not have a cavity or filling for the Cleveland public schools and the




suburban schools.  The frequency of elevated tooth lead  was 9.3% for molar




crowns with cavities and/or fillings, but only 4.3% for molar crowns without




cavities or fillings for children in the Cleveland public schools (Table 22).




The frequency of elevated tooth lead was 11.0% for molar crowns with a cavity




and/or fillings, but only 3.2% for molar crowns without cavities or fillings




for children in the suburbs (Table 25, .Figure 3).




     For the institution and hospital group, the incidence of elevated tooth




lead in 157 molar crowns without cavities and/or fillings was 9.1%, compared




with 9.3% for the Cleveland public schools and 11.0% for the suburban schools




(Tables 22, 25, 26).






Incisor and Molar Roots--




     Lead analyses on roots of incisor and molar teeth were done on a small




percentage of the total tooth sample.  Root tissue analyzed for lead included




only 3.9% of the sample from children in the Cleveland public schools and




2.4% of the samples from children in the suburban schools (Tables 22-25).




For the Cleveland public schools, the frequency of elevated lead was 19.2%




for th^ incisor root tissue from 99 children; and 18.5% for molar root tissue




from 54 children (Table 22).  For the suburban public schools, the frequency




of elevated lead was 23.6% for incisor root tissue of 42 children, but only




2.3% for molar root tissue of 43 children (Table 25).  For the institution




'and hospital group, elevated lead was present in 27% of 547 teeth (Table 26).




This incidence of elevated lead in molar root tissue (Table 26) is consider-




ably higher than the 2.3% for molar root tissue from suburban children




(Table 25).



                                    25

-------
              oSaSososoSosososoSoSQSQicSQSasosos     
<7>



T— 1
CTi




i— 1
— J
CTi

to



pj
 I"1
e -H
3 -e
Z 0

i-l O
o o
2 OS
• -p
o o
fi o
I-H OS

^
d c
rH 5
O O
2 (H
u
M
O

•H 3
0 O
C, fn
M U







fH
03 P
^H 0
o o
2 OS


• -p
U 0
C 0
h-H OS


fH
03 C
>-i S
o o
2 ^
^J

^1
o
H
C^
<
s
plj
§
PJ
W

Q

^r
H-3
tu
W

0










ues from incisor
in
(/)
•H
4J
(3
• H

'S

0
O
i— 1
^^
)O
a.
bO
e

+
0

OO
« — '
_l
rt
0)
rH

"T3
(D

nJ

a>

(U

^M
o
CD
U
C
(U
fc
3
O
o
o

0\°
0)

£_j


•
to

o
f-t
a
•H
0-
tissues from

•p
o
o
^
C
•H
13
C
d

w
W>
C
•H
t-H
•H
<4_l

^1
O

13
d

to
0
•H

•H
^
d
O

-p
3
0

•p
3:

r*t
P
CD
•P

M-l
O

C
g
o

o

^
d
rH
O
e

c
d




.

-------
Shed Incisor Crowns Without Cavities or Fillings








Cleveland Public Schools—




     The frequency distribution of tooth lead levels in incisor crowns without




cavities or fillings are listed for each school in the Cleveland public system




(TabZe 27).  The number of teeth, which also represents the number of children




ranged from only one tooth to 94 in the various schools (Table 27).  The




prevalence of elevated tooth lead for the five schools having 70 or more




samples ranged from 3.3% to 16.4%.  The other three schools had 6.0%, 9.0%




and 12.8% elevated tooth lead in incisor crown tissue from teeth not having




a cavity or filling.  The schools which had only 3.8% of elevated tooth lead




levels had 60.8% of the 79 incisor teeth in the lowest range of tooth lead




(0 to 4.9 mg Pb/100 g).  The school which had 16.4% elevated tooth lead had




50.7% in the lowest range.  The range in prevalence of elevated tooth lead




levels found among the individual schools in Cleveland indicates that sources




of lead exposures of children are related to local factors because children




were not bused and attended their neighborhood school  The differences were




not due to variations in processing teeth because all steps in the preparation




and analyses were done by random sampling as stated in the section on controls




for error sources.







Catholic Schools—




     The number of children and the percent frequency distribution of lead in




shed incisor crowns of teeth not having cavities or fillings for 620 children




in the 43 Catholic schools in Cleveland are given in Table 28.  The five




Catholic schools from which 30 or more samples were received ranged from 3.2%
                                       27

-------
to 18.9% of children having 8.0 or more me Pb/100 g of incisor crown tissue




from teeth not having a cavity or filling (Table 28).  The percent of 8.0 or




more Pb/100 g for the other three schools with 30 or more samples was 8.4%,




16.1% and 18.2%.  One school with an incidence of 18.9% of elevated tooth




lead is in an area near the Cuyahoga valley and had a vehicle count of 58,000.




Another school with 8.4% occurrence of elevated tooth lead is in a western




location near the airport.




     Comparison of frequency distributions of Catholic schools in Cleveland




with the Cleveland public schools shows that 46.5% of the 620 children in the




Catholic schools were in the lowest range of 0 to 4.9 mg Pb/100 g, but that




only 39.2% of the 3,911 Cleveland public school children were in this range.






Lutheran Schools--




     The percent frequency distribution of lead in incisor crowns of teeth




not having cavities or fillings for the five Lutheran schools in Cleveland




and the five Lutheran schools in the suburbs are given in Table 29.  This




table contains data showing that elevated tooth lead was present in as many




of the 44 children living in the suburbs as in the 39 children within



Cleveland (Table 29).






Suburban Schools --




     Percent frequency distributions of the amount of lead in shed incisor




crowns of teeth not having cavities or fillings for children in the suburbs




are given in Tables 40-45.  The summary (Table 30) shows that one suburb had




a 32.7% occurrence of elevated tooth lead for 110 children.  This prevalence




of elevated tooth lead is approximately twice that of the other suburbs. The




range for these suburbs was  5.5% to 16.7% of elevated tpoth lead (Table 30).





                                     28

-------
     One elementary school in a suburb located near the industrial valley of




the Cuyahoga River had 15.2% occurrence of elevated tooth lead.  The lowest




incidence of elevated tooth lead was 5.5% for 305 children living in an east-




ern suburb on the shore of Lake Erie.



     The percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead in shed incisor crowns of




teeth not havin? cavities or fillings show that preater variations occur




between individual schools within a  suburb than between the means of the




suburbs (Table 301.  For example, 22.7% of 75 children in one  school and 7.8%




of the 64 children in another school of one suburb (Table 31)  had elevated




tooth lead in incisor crown tissue.  Similar variations in the  percent  of




elevated are shown in the table for  other suburbs  (Tables 32-33).






Effects of Covariate Data on the Prevalence of Elevated Tooth  Lead







     Age has been considered a variable in the amounts of tooth  lead.




Brudevold and Steadman  (1956) stated that lead is present in the enamel of




unerupted and erupted teeth.  Derise and Ritchey (1974) reported that  lead  in




the enamel of permanent caries-free teeth increased from 43.0  -  1.0 ppm for




39 children 10 to 12 years old to 48.8 - 0.9 ppm for 44 adults over 25 years




old.  The amounts of lead in dentine also increased in these two groups from




38.9 * 1.4 ppm to 51.5 - 1.3 ppm in those who were over 25 years old.




     Table 36 contains the percent frequency distribution of lead in teeth




by age at loss of tooth and by residential history.  Residential history was




divided into two categories:  children who had lived in the home where the  tooth




was lost 80-100% of their lives and children who had lived at that address




less than 80% of their lives.   In the 80-100% group are included 3,935 children




or 35% of  the total  sample.   Six-year-old  children  (1,130)  represented 28.7% of




                                      29

-------
the sample in the 80-100% group.  Children less than 5 years old, 9, 11, and




12 years old represented less than 10% of the 3,935 children (Table 36 and




Figure 4).




     Tooth lead between the amounts of 4.0 to 5.9 mg Pb/100 g was present in




42.8% of the 80-100% lifespan group and in 44.2% of the 79% or less lifespan




group.  The incidence of tooth lead above 8.0 mg Pb/100 g was approximately




the same for the two groups (Table 36 and Figure 4).




     The percent incidence of elevated tooth lead was approximately the same




for the 2,120 boys and the 2,799 girls in the Cleveland public schools (Figure




5).  The percent incidence of elevated tooth lead was also approximately the




same for the 770 boys and the 771 girls living in one suburb (Figure 6).




Comparisons of the decrease in tooth lead shows that the decreased incidence




of elevated tooth lead was the same for the Cleveland and suburban groups




(Figures 5 and 6).





     Pearson and Speamian correlations of age at the time of tooth loss and




the amount of tooth lead show a significant decrease with age in tooth lead




for shed deciduous teeth of children in all public and parochial school



systems (Tables 37 arid 38).  However, this decrease with age, is not present




in the "Hospital" group (Table 37).  The "Hospital" group included a high




percentage of extracted teeth.




     The decrease of lead with age of children in our study differs from the




 reports of Derise and Ritchey (1974) for enamel and dentine of permanent




 teeth.  The cause or causes for higher tooth lead in younger children living




 in the Cleveland metropolitan area are not known.  The decrease with age may




                                      30

-------























o

II
CD
O
C
CD
T)
•H
10
CD
£_l
j i
+-*
rt

0)
t4H
•H
f-H

o\°
0
O
i-H
1
O
00



X





















oX3
O
(0








X 0



X 0



X 0

X

II
CD X O
o
c
CD

•H
to OX
CD
f"4

•P
cti
X 0
CD
<4H
i— 1

o\° O X

to
10
CD
i-H
O X
to
0

O}
t->
X 0


o





0 X





o x




o x




0\° 0\° 0\° 0\°
LO O LO O o\° o\°
CN CN i-H rH LO O
C
•H
TJ
C
rt
0\°
o
+ o
K5 i-H
i-H 1
O
oo
CN 4->
rH TH
)5

CD
rH ^1
f-H FO
i-H
•H
f~]
O
0
i-H CD LO
3 to
to &i
to •>
•H tO
4_)
CT> C
X -H
4.)
O *^CJ
O rt
4-* O
00 rH
*-H
0 X
t/) O
S O
r*- TO 4-*
^
W) *4-H
o
0
0 C
\O i — I O
•H
to -P
O !l3
o . o
• H
1/1 "3 £
0) to
r-H -H
•* 0 X
0
to c
S CD
Co 3
fn cr
to M CD
•H to
I-H MH
i— i
•rH 1 *
s c

-------







CD CD O




CO CO CO


^ CD CD CD CD CO CD
(/) rH
>. rH
O -H
CO 0

i* Ji CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ oa

CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD





CQ CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO









CQCOCOCQCQCOCOCOCOCOCO






CDCDCDCDCDCDC3CDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD




CQ CQ CQ CQ CO CO CQ CO CQ CQ





<3P o\° o\° o\° s
o
o
CM
C^J i^
rH •>
1 fM
01
O
CM IH
rH
O^ 00
o
00
00

"3
cd
00 0)
I-H
O
r**"- o
•p

•xt
0>
4->
t^ rt
^
0)
rH
O
VO

O
c
o
rH
\O rH
3
O
o
o

o\°
LO "O
s

(U
bo

.
LO

0}
rH
o 5>
60 -H
< tt,





















1— 1
o
o

o


o
•H
i-H
o
3
1
rH
0)
^
0)
I— 1
u

*T3
0>
T3
C

in
TH
•H
60

O4
?-
•t
CM
32

-------






CD CD CD


CQ CQ



W r-l
X H

CQ O

II II
CQ CD
CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ 03




0 0 0 CD CD 0 0

rn po ro ro ro ro




CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD


03 CQ CQ OQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ



CDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCDCD




CQCQoacQCQCQCQCQCQoacQOQCQCQCQCQCQ


o\° o\° o\° «^° o\°
O LO O LO O o\° o\°
tO CM CM rH rH LO O




CM
^«

to
rH
CM



CTi
js^



rH
00



^.
to
rH

LO
to
rH


rH
CM
CM

CM
rH
CM


0
CTl



CT»
?H
0)
"§
2
Z






CM
rH
1
CT>
CM
rH
1
CTl


OO




oo




r--


^



vD



\0



LO




LO


CD
00
<£

X
O
o
o
in
/ — \
laO
O
O
rH
bO
B

^.
O
00
V 	 /

rQ
rt

r-H

rC
O
o
•^
"2
cS
0
r-t
O
0

o
o
e

-------
be related to a longer period for resorption of the teeth in the older




children.  The possibility of resorption decreasing the tooth lead would also




account for the absence of a significant correlation between age and tooth




lead for children in the "Hospital" group (Table 37).  However, the possible




factor of younger children being subjected to increased lead pollution during




infancy and early childhood should not be ruled out.






Cleveland Public Schools--




     The percent occurrence of elevated lead was highest in 5-year-old boys




and girls and decreased with age (Tables 39-40)  For 2,120 boys in the




Cleveland public school system, the percent frequency of teeth which had 8.0




or more mg Pb/100 g were the following:  27.8%, 5-year-old boys; 18.0%, 6




year-olds; 15.3%, 7-year-olds; 10.2%, 8-year-olds; and 5.2% for the boys aged




9 through 12.  The decrease with age for the percent frequencies of 8.0 or




more mg Pb/100 g was the following for the 2,799 girls:  24.7%, 5-year-old




girls; 17.7%, 6-year-old; 13.0%, 7 year-old; 9.2% for 8-year-old; and 5.2%




for girls aged 9 through 12 (Table 39^ Figure 5).




     Comparisons of boys and girls show that 42.5% of the boys and 43.1% of




the girls had tooth lead values in the range of 1.0 to 4.9 mg Pb/lOOg; 43.9%




of the boys and 44.2% of the girls, between 5.0 to 7.9 mg Pb/lOOg.  The




percent frequency occurrence of elevated tooth lead (8.0+mg Pb/100 g) was




13.6% for the 2,120 boys and 12.6% for the 2,799 girls  (Table 39).   Therefore




sex was not found to be a determinant of tooth lead level in this study.






One Suburban School System—




     The percent occurrence of elevated lead  (8.0+ mg Pb/100 g) was  also




highest in 5-year-old boys and girls and decreased with age  (Table 40).




In this one suburb, percent frequencies of teeth which contained  8.0+ mg Pb/






                                       14

-------
  100  g  were the  following  for 710 boys:   26.1% of the 5-year-old boys;  21.2%




  of the 6-year-old; 8.1% of the 7-year-old; 7.4% of the 8-year-old; and  only




  1.4% of the boys aged 9 through  12 years.  The decrease  in occurrence of




  elevated tooth lead was similar  to the 771 girls in this suburban school




  system.  The occurrence of elevated tooth lead for the girls was the




  following:  22.2% of the 5-year-old girls; 21.1%, 6-year-old;  11.9%, 7-year-




  old; 10.1%, 8-year-old; and 2.4% of the girls aged 9 through 12.




      Frequency distribution by age was the following:  53.8% of the boys




  and  57.0% of the girls had tooth lead in  the range of less than 1.0 mg  Pb  to




  4.9  mg Pb/lOOg.  The  prevalence   of boys and girls in the lowest range is




  10%  higher for the children in the one suburb than for the children in  the




  Cleveland public schools (Table 40).  Only 42.5% of the boys and 43.1%  of  the




  girls in the Cleveland public schools were in the lowest range of tooth




  lead (<1.0 to 4.9 mg Pb/100 g) (Table 39).




      The incidences of elevated  tooth lead (8.0+ mg Pb/100 g)  were 11.7%




  (83)  for the 710 boys and 12.6%  (97)  for the 771 girls in this single suburb.




The 12.6% of elevated  tooth lead  for the girls was the same incidence as for




the 2,799 girls in the Cleveland  public schools.   However, the boys in the




suburb had a slightly  lower occurrence (11.7%)  than did the 2,120 boys in the




Cleveland public schools  (13.6%)  (Tables 39-40,  Figure 6).






Elevated Tooth Lead and Lead Source





Data Description—




     Data for the various environmental sources of lead for each school based




on the methods described  previously are presented in Tables 41-50.




     The relation between the housing risk for the half mile radius around  the




school and the amounts of tooth lead in shed teeth included only those




children who had lived the last 80% to 100% of their lifespan in the house





                                      35

-------
where living when the tooth was shed.  Tables 51 and 52 include the actual




number and the percent of schools in the housing risks categories which were




based upon the percent of pre-1950 housing units in the census tract in which




the schools were located.



     Sixty-six (27.6%) of the 239 elementary schools did not have any




children with lead values above 8.0 mg Pb/100 g.  Forty-two of these 65




schools were in census tracts in which 80% to 100% of the housing units were




constructed before 1950.  In the 64 schools having a 15% to 30% occurrence




of elevated tooth lead, 38 of the 64 were in census tracts having 80% to




100 % pre-1950 housing (Tables 51-52).




     Approximately one-fifth (47) of the 223 schools included in Table 53,




which pertains to lifespan residency and vehicle traffic, did not have a




single intersection listed among  the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga




County within a one-half mile radius of the school.  The 47 schools included




19 schools with an incidence of 15% or more of the children having elevated




tooth lead.  In the range of 35,000 to 69,000 vehicles per 12-hour period




were 65 schools with elevated tooth lead in 15% of the children tested.  The




percent of schools with more than a 15% occurrence of elevated tooth lead




(8.0+ mg) was 8.4% for the 47 schools which did not have a single intersect-




ion listed among the 1,050 busiest intersections.  The percent of schools




with more than a 15% occurrence of elevated tooth lead was 11.1% for the




65 schools which had vehicle counts in the range of 35,000 to 69,000 (Tables




53-54).




    Approximately one-half (49.6%) of the 238 schools were, located in census




tracts having $6,600 to $10,900 mean annual income (Tables 55-56). In this




group of 118 schools, 47 schools had 15% or more children with elevated tooth






                                     36

-------
lead.  In the income range of $15,000 or higher, 7 of the 18 schools had 15%




or more children with elevated tooth lead.  There was not, therefore, a




decrease in the prevalence of elevated tooth lead in children attend-




ing schools in census tracts with higher mean annual incomes.  In fact, the




incidence was essentially the same:  39.9% of the 118 schools in the $6,600




to $10,900 range and 38.9% of the 18 schools in the $15,000 or higher mean



incomes (Tables 55-56).






Correlation Analysis--




     The 126 Cleveland public and the 46 parochial schools in Cleveland had




significant negative correlations between housing risk and the mean annual




income.  Both Pearson and Spearman coefficients of correlation show that




there was not significant correlations between the percent occurrence of 8.0




or more mg Pb/lOOg of tooth tissue for the school and the following scores




of the schools:  % pre-1950 housing, % white children, mean annual income of




the census tract in which schools were located, and the number of vehicles




passing through major intersections within a half-mile radius of the school




(Tables 57-58).  The number of lead industries within a one-half mile radius




of the 126 Cleveland public schools was significantly correlated with the




percent incidence of elevated tooth lead in children in these schools.  The




parochial and suburban school systems did not have significant correlations




between the number of lead industries and the percent occurrence of elevated




tooth lead (Tables 57-58).




     The housing risk (% pre-1950 houses) was significantly negatively




correlated with the mean annual income and the number of lead industries




within the half-mile radius of the 126 Cleveland public schools (Tables 57-




58).  For the 46 parochial schools, there was also a significantly negative





                                     37

-------
correlation between the % pre-1950 houses and mean income.  The % pre-1950



housing was significantly positively correlated with the vehicle traffic and



the number of lead industries.   For the 67 suburban schools, there was a



signficantly negative correlation between the % pre-1950 houses and the



%"white children.  The correlation between the % pre-1950 houses and the



number of lead industries was signficantly positively correlated for the



67 suburban schools  (Tables 57-58).



     The % white children in the 126 schools of the Cleveland public schools



was, as expected, positively correlated with mean annual income and negative-



ly correlated with the number of lead industries.  However, the 67 suburban



schools did not have significant Pearson coefficients of correlation between



the % white children and mean income or the expected negative correlation



between % white children and the number of lead industries.  The % white



children was negatively correlated with vehicle traffic.



     Two other correlations were signficant. Mean annual incomes of the



census tracts of schools were negatively correlated with the number of lead



industries for the three groups of schools: Cleveland public, parochial,'and



suburban.  Secondly, the Pearson coefficients of correlation between vehicle



traffic and the number of lead industries were signficantly positive



correlations for the parochial and suburban schools.  The correlation between



vehicle traffic and lead industries was not significant for the Cleveland



public schools (Tables 57-58).
                                     38

-------
Relationship between Elevated Tooth Lead and Ambient Air Pollution






Tooth Lead and Air Scores--




     The percent incidences of elevated tooth lead in schools within a mile




radius of each air station are listed in Table 59.  Air stations are identi-




fied by the encircled numbers on the map.  Schools are identified on the map




by two letters.




     A wide range of differences occur in the percent occurrences of elevated




tooth lead of schools within the mile radius of an air station.  For example,




the percent occurrence of 8.0+ mg Pb/100 g of tooth lead in schools within




the mile radius of the same air station ranged from 0 to 23% elevated tooth




lead for schools in air stations numbered 2, 4, 5, 14 and 15; and from less




than 7% to more than 20% for schools within a mile radius of air stations




numbered 1, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 17.  Air station 3, which is near the industrial




valley, had four schools with the following percent occurrences of elevated




tooth lead: 14.6% of 96 children; 18.2% of 22; 16.7% of 30; 20.3% of 64; and




44.4% of 9 children.  The % pre-1950 housing, % white children, and the mean




income for these four schools were approximately the same.   The vehicle




traffic ranged from "0" to 100,000 vehicles for these four schools.




     Some schools in the industrial valley of the Cuyahoga River had relative-




ly low percentage occurrences of elevated tooth lead.  For example, in air




station 1, only 3.6% of the 28 children in one school had tooth lead values




above 8.0 mg Pb/100 g.




Vehicle Traffic and Air Scores--




     The vehicle score of schools ranged from "0" to 50,000 or more vehicles




per 12 hour period for the mile radius around 6 of the 20 air collecting
                                     39

-------
stations.  Most schools within the mile radius of #2 and #7 air stations



were surrounded by a mile radius of very heavy traffic.   Schools in



these two air stations, however, did not have higher percent occurrences



of elevated tooth lead.




Housing and Air Scores—



     The percent of pre-1950 houses for schools were approximately the



same for most schools within a mile radius of an air station.   For



example, in air station 2, the percent pre-1950 housing ranged from 82



to 100%.  For air station 4, the percent pre-1950 housing ranged from



89% to 100%.




Correlation Analysis—



     Pearson and Spearman correlations show that air lead scores were



not correlated with the scores for air particulate (Tables 60-61).



However, air lead was significantly negatively correlated with air



antimony for both the Cleveland public and parachial groups of schools.



Air lead and SO- for the parochial schools were negatively correlated by



both the Pearson and Spearman methods.  However, the air lead and S0»



for schools in the Cleveland public school system were not significant.



     Other significantly negative correlations occurred between air



cadmium and S02 for both groups of schools.  Significantly positive



Pearson and Spearman correlations were present between air particulate



and air S0_ scores for both the Cleveland public and the parochial



schools (Tables 60-61).



     Air lead levels were not found to be related to the prevalence of



elevated tooth lead levels (8.0 mg+/100 g) for either the Cleveland



public schools nor the parochial schools.





                                   40

-------
NEUROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF LEAD




     Evaluations of physical, emotional and learning characteristics were done




by teachers on 6,480 children in 25 elementary schools in the Cleveland public




school system.  Five of these schools had less than 10% occurrences of




elevated tooth lead and five had 25% or higher occurrences of elevated tooth




lead.  The other 15 schools were in the range of 11% to 24.6% elevated tooth




lead.  Lead toxicity has been postulated to be associated with the physical,




emotional, and learning disabilities some of which were included in the




teacher evaluations of children at the end of the school year.







Teachers' Evaluations




     Table 62 presents the results of the teacher evaluations by school and




gives the prevalence of elevated tooth lead as well as the number of children




evaluated.  Table 63 presents data from the 24 Cleveland schools which had




teeth lead data available which show that 8.1% of the 6,480 children evaluated




with tooth lead data available were left-handed.   This percentage varied from




8.9 to 9.3% in children aged 7-12.  Teachers reported that 1.3% (84) of the




6,480 children were known by them to be receiving medication.  The percent




of children receiving medication was lowest in the 5-year-olds and highest




in 10 and 11-year-old children (Table 63).




     Seven-year-old children had the highest index of learning disabilities




(13.7) and emotional symptoms (10.3) (Table 63).   The learning difficulties




included regressions in writing and drawing, reading, and speech;  confused,




poor memory; difficulty in arithmetic; and short attention span.  The




emotional symptoms includes restlessness, cries easily, aggressive behavior,




impulsive, temper outbursts, emotional instability; cruel behavior, withdrawn,




bangs head, and unpopular with peers.  The incidence of the physical




disabilities (5.2) observed by teachers was highest in 8-year-old children




(Table 63).




                                      41

-------
Relationships of Variables to Teacher Evaluations

     Pearson and Spearman coefficients of correlation between % white
children and the learning score were negatively significant (Tables 64-65).
Significantly negative Pearson correlations also occurred between race and
the emotional scores (Table 64).  The Spearman correlations of % white children
with the physical as well as the emotional and learning scores were negatively
significant (Table 65).
     Scores of the teacher evaluations for six schools having 96% to 100%
black children and eight schools having 96% to 100% white children are given
in Table 66.   The mean for elevated tooth lead was 20.5% for the six schools
having black pupils and 21.4% for the eight schools having white children.
The percent occurrences of left-handedness and the use of medication, and the
emotional and physical scores showed greater variations between schools than
between racial composition of the schools (Table 66).  The learning disabili-
ties  had an index above 10 for 4 of 6 schools having black children and
above 10 for 2 of 8 schools having white children (Table 66).
     The Spearman correlations between the number of lead industries and the
presence of physical symptoms was significant, but the Pearson correlations
between lead industries and physical symptoms was only of borderline (0.65)
significance (Tables 64-65).  None of the Pearson and Spearman correlations
between % left-handed, % use of medication, and the physical, emotional,
and learning scores of the schools was significantly correlated with the
housing risk, mean income or vehicle traffic counts of schools (Tables 64-
65).
                                    42

-------
Relations of Teacher Evaluation Subscores



     Significantly positive correlations occur between the following items

of the teacher evaluations:  % left-handed with % use of medication; % use

of medication with physical scores; physical scores with emotional and with

learning scores; and learning scores with the physical and emotional scores


(Tables 67-68).   Left-handedness was included in the scoring by teachers because

of observations that left-handed children may have emotional symptoms more

frequently than do right-handed children.  The Pearson coefficient of

correlation between the % left-handed and the emotional score was 0.56; and

the Spearman correlation was 0.06 (Tables 67-68).



Teacher Evaluation Scores and Ambient Air Exposures



     Significantly negative Pearson and Spearman correlations occurred

between the % left-handed children in schools and the % S02 tests which were

above 80 ug S02/m^ (Tables 69-70).   This negative correlation may mean that

more right-handed children lived in'areas of SO- pollution, rather than there

being any cause-effect relation between right-handedness and SC>2 pollution.

Use of medication was not correlated with particulate, air lead, air cadmium,

air antimony, or SC>2 (Tables 69-70).

     Air antimony scores (% tests above 217 ng/m3) and the school scores for

% left-handed,  use of medication, and the scores for physical, emotional,

and learning symptoms of lead toxicity were not significant in the Pearson

correlations (Table 69).  However,  the % left-handed and air antimony were

signficantly negative correlants in the Spearman correlations (Table 70).
                                      o
     Air lead samples above 1,515 ng/m  during the year of August 1971-1972


were signficantly positively correlated with the physical, emotional,  and


                                     43

-------
learning scores of schools.  Both the Pearson and Spearman correlations

                                               3
between % of air lead tests above 1,515 ng Pb/m  and the scores of the physical,


emotional, and learning disabilities were significant.  Pearson coefficients

                                                           o
of correlation between % air lead tests above 1,515 ng Pb/m  with the score


of physical symptoms was .028; with the emotional symptoms, .008; and with


the learning disability scores, .019.  The Spearman correlations between %

                                  o
air lead tests above 1,515 ng Pb/m  with the physical symptoms was .019; with


emotional symptoms, .004; and with the learning disabilities associated with


lead toxicity, .003.  These significant correlations indicate a need for


additional research on the effects of this level of air lead pollution on


physical, emotional, and learning symptoms and disabilities of lead toxicity.


A time lapse was involved in relating the data on teacher evaluations to the


air statistics for the period of August 1971 to August 1972.  Lead has been


shown to have residual effects on emotional and learning abilities of children


(Bryce-Smith, 1972; De la Burde and Choate, 1972).



Teacher Evaluations for the Suburbs


     Teachers in 26 elementary schools in seven suburbs scored 11,400


children for physical and emotional symptoms and for learning disabilities


associated with lead toxicity.  These children were evaluated at the end of


the school year (Tables 71-72).  Comparisons of • the evaluations of children


in the seven suburbs with the 6,497 children in the 24 Cleveland public


schools indicate the following:  The percent of suburban children who were


considered to be left-handed was 9.1%; the % for Cleveland children, 8.1%.


The percent occurrence of children known to be taking medication was 2.1% for
                                      44

-------
for the suburban children and 1.1% for the Cleveland children  (Tables 71,63).


     Scores for physical symptoms were as high or higher  than  the physical


symptom score of Cleveland in three of the seven suburbs.  Scores for the


emotional characteristics were as high in one suburb (10.8) as for the 24


schools in the Cleveland system  (9.2).  In six of the seven suburbs  (Table 63),


the scores for learning disabilities were lower than for  Cleveland (Table 71) .


In one suburb, the learning disability score was 10.0 compared with  10.2 for


the 25 Cleveland schoolr,.


     Age was a factor in the number of learning disabilities reported in the


suburbs (Table 72).   Eight-year-old children in one school system had the


highest index of learning disabilites (Table 72).   The learning disability


score in this suburb was 7.2 for 4,497 of the children in this suburb. In


another suburb, five-fear-old children had the highest learning disability


score (22.0) and the seven-year-olds had 12.8.  The learning disability


score for seven-year-olds in the Cleveland public schools was 13.7.


     Comparison of teacher evaluations for the 26 individual schools show


that greater diversity occurs between individual schools of a single suburb


than between the means of suburban school systems or between the suburbs and


the Cleveland public schools (Tables 71,72).   Variations in scores of the


learning disabilities ranged from 1.4 to 10.8 in one suburb (Table 63)  and


from 3.7 to 15.3 in another suburb (Table 63).  The ranges for emotional and


physical scores also show that there were greater differences in scores


between individual  schools within a suburb than between means of the suburbs


or between the means of the suburbs and the Cleveland public schools.  Since


data on air lead were not available for the suburbs, the % tests for air lead

                   'T
above 1,515 ng Pb/m , correlations could not be made to determine if the



                                     45

-------
% air lead tests above 1,515 ng Pb/m  were positively correlated with the



physical, emotional, and learning disabilities associated with lead toxicity



as were the correlations between air lead and the scores of the physical,



emotional, and learning disability scores for the Cleveland public schools.
                                     46

-------
                                 SECTION 4




                                 DISCUSSION






SUMMARY OF RESULTS






Lead Absorption Study




     Analyses of data on lead in deciduous teeth show that as many suburban




children were exposed to excess lead as were children living within the City




of Cleveland.  Elevated tooth lead (8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g) was present in




12.6% (460) of the 3,653 children who lived in nine suburbs located at varying




distances in all three directions from the center of Cleveland.  This amount




of tooth lead (8.0+ mg Pb/100 g) was present in 13.2% (834) of the 6,326




children living within the City of Cleveland.  Incisor crown tissue from




teeth which did not have a cavity and/or filling comprised 75% of the tooth




samples of the Cleveland children and 80% of the samples of the suburban




children.  The incidence of elevated tooth lead (8.0+ mg Pb/100 g) in the




shed incisor crowns of teeth not having a cavity and/or filling was 15.2% of




the 3,911 Cleveland children and 15.5% of the 2,854 children who lived in the




nine suburbs.




     Means of tooth lead show that suburban children were exposed to as much




lead as were the children living within the City of Cleveland.  The mean




tooth lead was 5.57 mg Pb/100 g for the 5,333 children in the Cleveland public




schools.  Means of tooth lead in four of the nine suburban school systems was




higher than the mean for Cleveland.   The means for these four suburbs were






                                     47

-------
6.54, 5.7, 5.68 and 5.7 mg Pb/100 g.  The mean tooth lead for the other




five suburban school systems were only slightly lower than the mean for the




Cleveland schools.  Needleman and coworkers quantitated lead in dentine of




the teeth of 761 Philadelphia school children.  They reported that 174 black




children living in areas of deteriorated housing had a mean of 198 micrograms




per gram of dentine.  This value (19.8 mg/100 g) of dentine is considerably




higher than our means because dentine samples were used.




     Needleman, Tuncay and Shapiro (1972) also determined the amount of lead




in 69 teeth from children in the "lead belt" of Philadelphia and in 40 teeth




from children living in the suburbs.  They found that tooth lead levels were




high in areas where lead eating by children is frequent.  All of these teeth




were obtained from dentists.  The mean tooth lead for the "lead belt" was




51.1^ 109 ppm and for the suburbs, 11.1- 14.8 ppm.  Stewart (1974) studied




lead in extracted deciduous molars of 310 children who were 3 to 10 years old




and who lived in Northern Ireland.  They found that the greatest amounts of




tooth lead occurred in children who lived in urban environments.  The tooth




samples used by Stewart (1974) included 148 children in Belfast, Ireland,




91 suburban children and 71 rural children.




        The frequency distributions of tooth lead in children included in our




study also show that suburban children are being exposed to as much lead as




are the Cleveland children.  The frequency distributions of lead in the shed




incisor crown tissue of teeth which did not have a cavity and/or filling show




the following:  In the low range of 0 to 4.9 mg Pb/100 g were 39% of the




3,911 Cleveland children and 42% of the 2,854 suburban children.  In the




high range of 8.0 + mg Pb/100 g were 52.2% of the Cleveland children and 15.2%




of the suburban children.
                                      48

-------
     The percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead decreased with age at time




of tooth loss.  For five-year-olds in Cleveland, 28% of the boys and 25% of




the girls had 8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g.  For five-year-olds in the suburbs,




27% of the boys and 28% of the girls had 8.0+ mg Pb/100 g.  The percent of




the eight-year-olds who had 8.0+ mg Pb/100 g was 10.7% for boys and 10.3%




for girls living in Cleveland; and 10.5% for boys and 8.3% for girls living




in the nine suburbs.




     Coefficients of correlations between tooth lead and age show that the




tooth lead decreased with age at time of tooth loss.  The negative correla-




tions between tooth lead and age were significant for each individual school,




for each of the nine suburban school systems, and for the Cleveland public




and parochial school systems.  The cause or causes for greater amounts of




tooth lead in younger children are not known.  Were the younger children




subjected to more lead during infancy and early childhood?  Did these child-




ren as infants drink milk products containing greater quantities of lead?




Lamm, Cole, Glynn and Ullmann (1973) state that infants fed certain milks and




milk concentrates during the first three months of infancy probably had




positive lead balance.  The decrease of tooth lead with age of the children




in our study, however, may be due to greater loss of lead during a longer




period for resorption of roots of the teeth shed by the older children.




     The mean income of census tracts in which schools were located was not




related to the percent occurrence of 8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g of tissue from




the teeth of children attending the school.  A 15% or higher occurrence of




elevated tooth lead for schools was present in 47 (38.8%)  of the 118 schools




located in census tracts having a mean annual income in the range of $6,000




to $10,000.  A 15% or higher incidence of elevated tooth lead occurred in
                                     49

-------
7 (38.9%) of the 18 schools located in census tracts with mean annual incomes




of $15,000 or higher.   However, mean income was negatively correlated with the




percent of pre-1950 housing, percent of white children,  and the number of




lead industries for the Cleveland public and parochial schools.  For the




suburban schools, mean income of the census tracts of schools was not related




to the percent occurrence of elevated tooth lead, percent of pre-1950 housing,




percent of white children, or to vehicle traffic.  A significantly negative




correlation did occur between mean income of census tracts of schools and the




number of lead industries around the 67 suburban schools.




     As expected, the housing risk ( % pre-1950 housing units in the census




tracts of schools) was greater for the Cleveland public schools than for the




suburban schools.  For Cleveland, the housing risk was not related to the




occurrence of elevated tooth lead or to vehicle traffic around the 126




Cleveland public schools.  The housing risk was positively correlated with the




number of lead industries and negatively correlated with the % white children




and the mean income.  For the 67 suburban school, the housing risk was not




related to elevated tooth lead or to mean income, but was directly correlated




with vehicle traffic and the number of lead industries.



     The number of lead industries in the half-mile radius around the




Cleveland public schools may be related the percent occurrence of elevated




tooth lead because the Pearson coefficient of correlation between elevated




tooth lead and lead industries was of borderline signficance.  For the




suburban group of schools, however, the percent occurrence of elevated tooth




lead was not related to the number of lead industries in the half-mile radius




around the schools.  As expected, the number of lead industries was directly




related to the % pre-1950 housing and indirectly related to mean income for
                                    50

-------
both the Cleveland public and the suburban groups of schools.




     The risk of vehicle traffic was not significantly correlated with the




percent incidence of elevated tooth lead for the Cleveland public and paro-




chial schools or for the suburban schools.  Contrary to what might be expect-




ed, almost twice as many Cleveland public as suburban public schools were




located in the center of a half-mile radius having low vehicle counts.  For




the Cleveland public schools, 39% were located in the center of a one-half




mile radius which did not contain a single one of the 1,050 busiest inter-




sections in Cuyahoga County.  In contrast, only 14% of the suburban schools




were in the center of a radius which did not contain any of the 1,050 of the




busiest intersections.






Neurological Effects Study




     The evaluations of the physical effects, emotional symptoms, and the




learning disabilities possibly related to lead toxicity by teachers at the




end of the school year included 6,497 children who attended 25 public schools




in the City of Cleveland.  The scores for physical, emotional, and learning




symptoms of lead toxicity were not related to the percent occurrence of ele-




vated tooth lead in children attending these schools.



     The percent of air lead tests which were 1,515 nannograms or above for




the air stations in which schools are located were significantly and directly




correlated with each of the three (physical, emotional, and learning scores)




measurements of lead toxicity.  In addition, Pearson coefficients of correla-




tion between air lead and the physical,  emotional, and learning scores were




significant and directly correlated.  The significantly positive coefficients




of correlation between air lead and the  physical, emotional, and learning
                                    51

-------
scores for children in the City of Cleveland indicate  that high levels of




atmospheric lead (1,515 ng Pb/myor above was related to the lead toxicity




symptoms included in the forms used by teachers to evaluate children at the




end of the school year.






IMPLICATIONS OF RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS






     These data on lead in shed deciduous teeth show that as many suburban




children were exposed to excess lead as were children who live within the




City of Cleveland.   Furthermore, the percent occurrence of elevated tooth




lead decreased with age of children who lived in Cleveland and in the




suburbs.  The exposure of suburban children to excess lead and the higher




occurrence of elevated tooth lead in the younger children indicate that




programs to prevent lead pollution and the harmful effects of lead toxicity




should not be limited to the City, but should be extended to include pre-




school children who live in the Cleveland suburbs.




     This study on tooth lead included a sample of 3,653 suburban children.




Previous studies on tooth lead in Philadelphia and other metropolitan areas




included relatively small samples of suburban and rural children.  It would




appear that tests for tooth lead and that blood-testing programs should be




considered for or extended to include preschool children who live in the




suburbs of other large cities.




     The positive correlation between the percent of air lead tests above




1,515 ng Pb/m^ and the symptoms of the physical, emotional and learning




 disabilities associated with lead toxicity applied only to children living




within the City of Cleveland.  In order to establish the importance of air




lead in relation to the physical, emotional and learning symptoms of lead






                                    52

-------
toxicity, the symptoms of lead toxicity which were included in our teacher




evaluation form should be related to the percent of tests for air lead




above 1,515 ng/m^ in another metropdlitan area.




     The percent occurrence of 8.0 or more mg Pb/100 g in deciduous teeth of




children in schools was not correlated with school scores of mean income,




percent pre-1950 housing, and vehicle traffic.  We did not have the opportun-




ity for follow-up research to determine if these socio-economic variables




applied to the individual child.   There were 840 Cleveland children and 460




suburban children who had 8.0+ mg Pb/100 g of tooth tissue.   The significance




of the proximity of lead industries in relation to tooth lead and the




location of homes of these individual children need also to be determined.
                                   53

-------
                                REFERENCES




1.   Brudevold, F., and L.T. Stedman.  The Distribution o£ Lead in Human




     Enamel.  J. Dental Res., 35: 430-437, 1956.




2.   Strehlow, C.D., and T.J. Kneip.  The Distribution of Lead and Zinc in




     the Human Skeleton.  Am. J. Hyg. Assoc. J., 30: 372-379, 1969.




3.   Berman, E.  The Biochemistry of Lead:  Review of the Body Distribution




     and Methods of Lead Determination.  Clin. Pediatrics, 5:  287-291, 1966.




4.   Needleman, H.L., I. Davidson, E.M. Sewall, and I.M. Shapiro.  Sub-




     clinical Lead Exposure in Philadelphia Schoolchildren.  N. Engl. J.




     Med., 290:  245-248, 1974.




5.   Altshuller, L.F., D.B. Halak, B.H. Landing, and R.A. Kehoe.  Deciduous




     Teeth as an Index of Body Burden Lead.  J. Pediatrics, 60:  224-229,




     1962.




6.   Needleman, H.L., O.C. Tuncay, and I.M. Shapiro.  Lead Levels in




     Deciduous Teeth of Urban and Suburban American Children.  Nature




     (London), 239:  111-112, 1972.




7.   Shapiro, I.M., B. Dobkin, O.C. Tuncay, and H.L. Needleman.  Lead Levels




     in Dentine and Circumpupal Dentine of Deciduous Teeth of Normal and




     Lead Poisoned Children.  Clin. Chim. Acta, 46:  119-123, 1973.




8.   Shapiro, I.M., H.L. Needleman, and O.C. Tuncay.  The Lead Content of




     Human Deciduous and Permanent Teeth.  Environ. Res., 5:  467-470, 1973.
                                   54

-------
9.  Habercam, J.W., J.E. Keil, J.P. Reigart, and H.W. Croft.  Lead Content




    of Human Blood, Hair, and Teeth:  Correlations with Environmental Factors




    and Growth.  J. Dental Res., 53:  1160-1163, 1974.




10. Stewart, D.J.  Teeth as Indicators of Exposure of Children to Lead.




    Arch. Dis. Child., 49:  895-897, 1974.




11. David, 0., J. Clark, and K.  Voeller.  Lead and Hyperactivity.  Lancet II,




    900-903, 1972.




12. Bryce-Smith, D.  Behavioral Effects of Lead and Other Heavy Metal




    Pollutants.  Chera. Britain,  8:  240-243, 1972.




13. Werry, J.S.  Developmental Hyperactivity.  Pediatr. Clin. N. Amer., 15:




    581-599, 1968.




14. Laufer, M.W., E. Denhoff, and G. Solomon.  Hyperkinetic Impulse Disorder




    in Children's Behavior Problems.  Psychosomat. Med., 19:  38-49, 1957.




15. Bradley, J.E., and R.J. Baungartner.  Subsequent Mental Development of




    Children with Lead Encephalopathy.  J. Pediatr., 53:  311-315, 1958.




16. De la Burde, B., and M.S. Choate.  Does Asymptomatic Lead Exposure




    in Children Have Latent Sequelae?  J. Pediatr., 81:  1088-1091, 1972.




17. Harrison, W.W., J.P. Yurachek, and C.A.  Benson.  The Determination of




    Trace Elements in Human Hair by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.   Clin.




    Chimica Acta, 23:  83-91, 1969.




18.  Bergman, H.G.  Comments on  the USEPA Development of a Sulfur Dioxide




     Control Strategy for the State of Ohio.  Public Information Office,




     Division of Air Pollution Control, 2735 Broadway, Cleveland Ohio, 1976.




19.  Derise, N.L., and S.J. Ritchey.  Mineral Content of Normal  Human Enamel




     and Dentine and the Relation of Composition to Dental Caries, II.




     Microminerals.  J.  Dental Res., 53:  853-858,  1974.






                                    55

-------
20.  Lamm, S., B. Cole, K. Glynn, and W. Ullman.  Lead Contents of Milks




     Fed to Infants- 1971-1972.   N. Eng. J. Med., 284:  574-575, 1973.
                                    56

-------
                               SOURCES OF DATA




1.  Traffic at Major Road Intersections in Order of Total Vehicles during




    the 12 Hour Period 7:00 A.M. to 7: P.M.  Revised to include 1970 Counts




    Published 1971.  Albert S. Porter, County Engineer, 1928 Standard




    Building, Cleveland, Ohio, 44113.




2.  U.S. Bureau of Census Population and Housing; 1970 Census Tracts. Final




    Report PHC (l)-45, Cleveland, Ohio, SMSA.  U.S. Dept.  Commerce Publica-




    tions.




3.  Report Number 1.2. 1-001 of the State of Ohio Department of Education,




    Division of Computer Services Statistical Reports of 1975-76.   School




    Enrollment during the First Full Week in October.




4.  Map Prepared by Regional Planning Commission, Cuyahoga County, Ohio,




    August 1975.




5.  1972 Directory of Ohio Manufacturers, Bureau of Economic Research, Ohio




    Deptment of Development, 27 edition, vol. 1.




6.  Extensive 1-year Survey of Trace Elements and Compounds in the




    Airborne Suspended Particulate Matter in Cleveland, Ohio.  R.B. King,




    J.S. Fordyce, A.C. Antoine, H.F. Leibecki, H.E. Neustadter, and S.M.




    Sidik, Lewis  Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio  44135.  NASA Technical




    Note TN, D8110, NASA, Washington, D.C.   1976.
                                    57

-------
FORM USED-BY TEACHERS FOR EVALUATIONS OF SYMPTOMS OF LEAD TOXICITY




Please evaluate.this child for each condition in the left column by checking




"Yes", "Average", or "No" in the right columns.   Any additional  comments are




welcome.
Number in Grade, Book School
1. Restless
2. Cries easily
3. Awkward gait
4. Convulsions
5 . Aggressive behavior
6. Impulsive
7. Temper outbursts
8. Emotional instability^
9. Tremor of hand
10. Regression in writing or drawing
11. Regression in reading
12. Regression in speech pattern
13. Muscular incoordination
14. Confused
15. Cruel behavior
16. Withdrawn
17. Poor memory
18. Bangs head
19. Upopular with peers
20. Difficulty in arithmetic
21. Short attention span
22. Squints eyes
23. Left-handed
24 . Ambidextrous
25. Maturation lag
26. Medication
Room
YES

























Sex
AVERAGE

























Age
NO

























     Please use back of page for additional remarks.
                                     58

-------
TABLE 1.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF HWAY SCORES FOR THE 131 PUBLIC ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS WITHIN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND

RANGE OF
VEHICLES \
*0 -
200 -
10,000 -
20,000 -
30,000 -
40,000 -
50,000 -
60,000 -
70,000 -
80,000 -
90,000 -
100,000 -
110,000 -
120,000 -
130,000 -
140,000 -
150,000 -
160,000 -
199
9,999
19,999
29,999
39,999
49,999
59,999
69,999
79,999
89,999
99,999
110,999
119,999
129,999
139,999
149,999
159,999
173,000
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
39
2
11
9
13
8
12
8
5
6
2
6
3
2
2
0
0
3
% OCCURRENCE OF
SCHOOLS
29.77
1.53
8.40
6.87
9.92
6.11
9.16
6.11
3.82
4.58
1.53
4.58
2.29
1.53
1.53
0.0
0.0
2.29
   * The "0" figure means that there  were no intersections included in the
     list of the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga County within the
     one-half mile radius around each elementary school.
                                       59

-------
TABLE 2.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF HWAY SCORES FOR k2 ROMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS

WITHIN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND

RANGE OF
VEHICLES
*o -
200 —
10,000 -
20,000 -
30,000 -
40,000 -
50,000 -
60,000 -
70,000 -
80,000 -
90,000 -
100,000 -
110,000 -
120,000 -
130,000 -
140,000 -
199
9,999
19,999
29,999
39,999
49,999
59,999
69,999
79,999
89,999
99,999
109,999
119,999
129,999
139,999
Plus
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
6
2
5
3
4
2
5
4
1
3
4
1
0
0
1
1
% INCIDENCE OF
SCHOOLS
14.28
4.76
11.90
7.14
9.52
4.76
11.90
9.52
2.38
7.14
9.52 -
2.38
0.0
0.0
2.38
2.38
     * The "0" figure means  that  there were  no  intersections  included in the
       list of the 1,050 busiest  intersections  in  Cuyahoga  County within the
       one-half mile radius  around each  elementary school.
                                   60

-------
TABLE 3. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR HWAY SCORES FOR 9 ELEMENTARY LUTHERAN

SCHOOLS IN CLEVELAND AND  THE SUBURBS
       RANGE OF
       VEHICLES
         0

       200

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000
   199

 9,999

19,999

29,999

39,999

49,999

59,999
              NUMBER OF
               SCHOOLS
4

0

2

0

0

1

2
                % INCIDENCE IN
                    SCHOOLS
44.44

 0.0

22.22

 0.0

 0.0

11.11

22.22
   *The "0" figure means that there were no intersections included  in
   the  list of the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga County within
   the one-half mile radius around each elementary school.
                                    61

-------
TABLE h.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF HWAY SCORES FOR 69 ELEMENTARY PUBLIC

SCHOOLS IN THE SUBURBS OF CLEVELAND

RANGE OF
*0-
200-
10,000-
20,000-
30,000-
uo,ooo-
50,000-
60,000-
70,000-
80,000-
90,000-
100,000-
VEHICLES
199
9,999
19,999
29,999
39,999
49,999
59,999
69,999
79,999
89,999
99,999
160,200
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS
10
3
12
16
6
3
2
8
2
2
2
1
% INCIDENCE
I'f.«*9%
«*.35%
17.39%
23.19%
11.59%
U.35%
2.90%
11.59%
2.90%
2.90%
2.90%
l.UH%
 * The 0 Figure means that there were no intersections  included in the list
 of the 1,050 busiest intersections in Cuyahoga County  within the one-half
 mile radius around each elementary school.
                                      62

-------
 TABLE  5.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF PERCENT HOUSING CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1950



IN THE CENSUS TRACTS IN WHICH THE 131 CLEVELAND HJBLIC SCHOOLS WERE LOCATED

RANGE % OF
PRE 1950 HOUSING
0-19
20-29
30 - 39
Uo - U9
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79
80 - 89
90 -100
TABLE 6. FREQUENCY OF
TO 1950 FOR THE CENSUS
SCHOOLS WERE LOCATED
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
2
2
3
6
6
U
12
15
81
% OF
SCHOOLS
1.52
1.53
2.29
fc.58
U.58
3.05
9.16
rufcs
61.83
DISTRIBUTION OF PERCENT OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTED PRIOR
TRACTS IN WHICH THE k$ ROMAN CATHOLIC

ELEMENTARY


RANGE % OF
PRE 1950 HOUSING
ko - 1*9
50 - 59
60 - 69
70 - 79
80 - 89
90 -100
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
3
1
3
3
6
27
.% OF
SCHOOLS
6.97
2.32
6.97
6.97
13.95
62.79
                                     63

-------
TABLE 7  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF PERCENT HOUSING CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1950




IN THE CENSUS TRACT IN VHECH THE 10 ELEMENTARY LUTHERAN SCHOOLS IN CLEVELAND




AND THE SUBURBS WERE LOCATED

RANGE
PRE 1950
10 -
20 -
30 -
40 -
50 -
60 -
70 -
80 -
% Of
HOUSING
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90 -100
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
1
0
3
1
1
0
2
1
1
% IN
SCHOOLS
10.0
0.0
30.0
JO.O
10.0
0.0
20.0
10.0
30.0
                                     64

-------
TABLE 8.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE PERCENT OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTED BEFORE




1950 FOR THE CENSUS TRACTS IN WHICH THE 68 SUBURBAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS WERE




LOCATED

RANGE
PRE 1950
0 -
10 -
20 -
30 -
40 -
50 -
60 -
70 -
80 -
% OF
HOUSING
9
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90 -100
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
10
8
4
10
4
7
4
6
4
11
% IN
SCHOOLS
14.71
11.76
5.88
14.71
5.88
10.29
5.88
8.82
5.88
16.17
                                     65

-------
TABLE 9.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MEAN ANNUAL INCOME FOR CENSUS TRACT OF




THE 131 CLEVELAND PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

RANGE OF
INCOME
2,000 - 3,999
4,000 - 5,999
6,000 - 7,999
8,000 - 9,999
10,000 -11,999
12,000 -13,999
14,000 -15,999
16,000 -17,999
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
2
11
20
44
38
13
1
2
TABLE 10. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MEAN ANNUAL INCOME IN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WITHIN THE
CITY OF CLEVELAND
% OF
SCHOOLS
1.53
8.40
15.27
33.59
29.01
9.92
0.76
1.53
1*3 ROMAN CATHOLIC


RANGE OF
INCOME
2,000 - 3,999
4,000 - 5,999
6,000 - 7,999
8,000 - 9,999
10,000 -11,999
12,000 -13,999

NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
0
1
3
13
21
5
66
% OF
SCHOOLS
0.0
2.32
6.97
30.23
48.83
11.62


-------
TABLE 11.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MEAN ANNUAL INCOME IN 10 LUTHERAN




SCHOOLS IN CLEVELAND AND IN THE SUBURBS

RANGE OF
INCOME
10,000 - 11,999
12,000 - 13,999
14,000 - 15,999
16,000 - 17,999
18,000 - 19,999
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
2
4
1
2
1
%
OF SCHOOLS
20
40
10
20
1
 TABLE 12.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF MEAN ANNUAL INCOME FOR CENSUS TRACTS




 OF 68 PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE SUBURBS

RANGE OF
INCOME
8,000
10,000
12,000
lU,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
2^,000
- 9,999
- 11,999
- 13,999
- 15,999
- 17,999
- 19,999
- 21,999
- 23,999
- 25,000
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
2
UL
30
13
9
1
0
1
1
%
OF SCHOOLS
2.9k
16.18
UU.12
19.12
13.2lt
lM
0.0
1.1*7
1.47
                                     67

-------
TABLE 13.   FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE PERCENT OF WHITE CHILDREN IN THF 110




ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WITHIN THE CITY OF CLEVELAND AND 70 SCHOOLS WITHIN THF SUBURBS

CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
RANGE OP
% WHITE
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69

70-79
80-89
90-94
95-100
NUMBER OF
SCHOOLS
59
1
2
2
4
3
3
'*•
5
7
13
31
%
OF SCHOOLS
45.38
0.77
1.54
1.54
3.08
2.51
2.31

3.85
5.38
10.00
23.85
SUBURBAN SCHOOLS
NUMBER
SCHOOL
0
1
0
2
1
0
0

2
7
0
57
7,
OF SCHOOLS
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2.9%
1.4%
0.0%
0,0%

2.9%
10.0%
0.0%
81.4%
                                     68

-------
TABLE lU.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBER OF INDUSTRIES WITHIN A HALF-




MILE RADIUS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC AND PAROCHIAL




SCHOOL SYSTEMS AND IN THE SUBURBAN SCHOOL SYSTEMS

Number
Industries
Cleveland
Public
Number Percent
0
i
2
3
h
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
lit
15
22
TOTAL

28
31
19
llf
9
8
9
5
2
0
1
0
2
1
1
2
1
133

21.1
23-3
1U.3
10.5
6.8
6.0
6.8
3.8
1'5
0.0
0.8
0.0
1.5
0.8
0.8
1.5
0.8


Cleveland
Number
15
12
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
0
0
o
0
1
0
1
0
52
69
Parochial
Percent
28.8
23.1
9.6
9.6
5,8
5.8
5.8
3.8
3-8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
1.9
0.0


Suburban Public
Number
fr
12
'3
1
a
6
0
0.
o
0
o
o
' 0
o
0
o
0
7X

Percent
76.1
16,9
4.2
iJf
l.fc
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0



-------
TABLE 15. PERCENT OF SAMPLES ABOVE THE MEAN AIR VALUE FOR THE 21 REPORTING




AIR MONITORING STATIONS

Air
Station
^
A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Particulate
82,3
21.3
HI. 2
23.5
31.6
22.2
19.0
22,1
8jL.O
78. 4

12,2
77.4
13,6
56.7
25.0
65.3
19. t
25* 5
jU.8
62»S
Pb%
15.2

7.5
17.2
12,2
18.2
19,2
18.8
4.3
29,4

6.0
3.0
0.0
19.2

26.7
	
. — ,
5.6
15.0
Cd%
22.7
. — ,
7.7
10.3
24,4
21.2
11.8
10.4
6.5
11.8
_„„
2.0
9.0
0.0
21.1
_,.,„
2.2
___

13.9
12,5
Sb%
20 . 5
„„,„
5.8
0,0
12.2
45.5
5.9
6.4
11.6
3.9

2.1
54,5
3.0
7.8

2.2

	
2.8
5.0
So2%
41,3
13.9
25.9
30,9
21 ,.G
20 ..5
21.8
19,2
36 »0
43,5

15.«l
5'U2
17.6
24 ,7
48.8
—
„_„
__-.
	
,_ — .
                                       70

-------
TABLE 16.  JOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE FROM AIR COLLECTING STATIONS IN CLEVELAND




(PARTICULATE DATA FROM GEORGE CRAIG, CLEVELAND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL CENTER)
Air
Station
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
TOTAL
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean ug/m3
198
124
123
97
100
100
100
102
211*
153
83
173
89
151
97
141
103
93
87
173
2501
Total
Samples
Analyzed
58
80
85
51
76
63
79
77
79
72
74
62
59
60
52
72
72
51
54
56
1332
71
Number
Samples
125 ug/m3
48
17
35
12
24
14
15
17
64
55
9
48
8
34
13
47
14
13
8
35
530
% Above
125 ug/m3
82.8
21.3
41.2
23.5
31.6
22.2
19.0
22.1
81.0
76.4
12.2
77.4
13.6
56.7
25.0
65.3
19.4
25.5
14.8
52.5
	

-------
TABLE 17.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF TESTS 2X THE ARITHMETIC MEM OF ATMOSPHERIC




LEAD FOR AIR STATIONS IN CLEVELAND.   DATA ON LEAD  IN  SUSPENDED PARTICULATE




WAS OBTAINED FROM DR. ROBERT B.  KING AND CO-WORKcRS OF THE  LEWIS  RESEARCH




CENTER AND WERE USED BY US TO PREPARE THIS TABLE FOR  6/1/71 to 7/31/72.

Air
Station
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
17
20
21
TOTAL
MEAN
Ajuius.1
Geometric
Mean-rig/m
850.6
723.2
843,7
695.9
856.6
864.1
777.1
682,4
1,064.6
576,6
523.6
441.9
754.3
1,197.8
457.7
811.9
12,125.0
757.8
Samples
Analyzed
46
53
29
41
33
52
48
46
51
50
33
34
52
45
36
40
689
43.1
Samples
Over ISIS
ng/jn3
7
4
s
5
6
10
9
2
15
3
1
0
10
12
2
6
97
6.06
% Samples
Over 1515
ng/m
15.2
7.5
17.2
12.2
18,2
19.2
18.3
4>3
29.4
6.0
5.0
0.0
3.9.2
26.7
S.6
15.0
-
14,1
                                       72

-------
TABLE 18.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF 5 TIMES ANNUAL MEAN OF ATMOSPHERIC CADMIUM



FOR AIR COLLECTING STATIONS IN CLEVELAND.  DATA ON CADMIUM IN SUSPENDED




PARTICUIATE OBTAINED IN SURVEY BY ROBERT B. KING AND CO-WORKERS OF LEWIS




RESEARCH CENTER WAS USED BY US TO PREPARE THIS TABLE (8/1/71 - 7/31/72)

Air
Station
1
3
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
lU
15
17
20
21
TOTAL
MEAN
Annual
Geometric
Mean ng/nP
5.7
3.2
2.3
*.7
5.8
k.O
3.2
3.*
^.3
1.7
^.7
1.8
5.6
3.9
3.*
1*.3
62.0
3.9
Total
Samples
for Cd
1*
52
29
Ul
33
51
W
1»6
51
50
33
3^
52
^5
36
Uo
685
U2.8
Samples
Over 19.5
ng/m3
10
U
3
10
7
6
5
3
6
1
3
0
11
1
5
5
80
5.0
% Samples
Over 19.5
ng/m3
22.7$
7.7%
10.3$
2^.14
21.2$
11.8$
10. U$
6.5$
11.8$
2.0$
9.0$
0.0$
21.1$
2.2$
13-9$
12.5$

11.7
                                    73

-------
TABLE 19.  PERCENT INCIDENCE OF 5X THE ANNUAL MEAN OF ATMOSPHERIC ANTIMONY




FOR AIR COLLECTING STATIONS IN CLEVELAND.   DATA ON ANTIMONY IN SUSPENDED




PARTICULATE FROM THE SURVEY BY MR. ROBERT B.  KING AND CO-WORKERS OF THE LEWIS




RESEARCH CENTER OF NASA WAS USED BY US TO PREPARE THIS TABLE.

Air
Station
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
17
20
21
TOTAL
MEAN
Annual
Geometric
Mean ng/m^
47.0
10.0
19.0
32.0
110.0
10.0
9.6
33.0
19.0
5.4
310.0
11.0
18.0
22.0
13.0
26.0
695.0
43.4
Total
Tests
for Sb
44
52
28
41
33
51
47
43
51
48
33
33
51
45
36
40
676
42.3
Tests
Over 217
ng/m3
9
3
0
5
15
3
3
5
2
1
18
1
4
1
1
2
73
4.6
% Tests
Over 217
ng/m
20.5%
"5.8%
0.0%
12.2%
45.5%
5.9%
6.4%
11.6%
3.9%
2.1%
54.5%
3.0%
7.8%
2.2%
2.8%
5.0%

10.8%
                                      74

-------
TABLE  20.  MEAN OF TOOTH LEAD IN 11,207 CHILDREN ATTENDING CLEVELAND PUBLIC




AND PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS, SUBURBAN SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS,  AND MISCELLANEOUS




SOURCES

School
Cleveland Public
Parochial
Roman Catholic
Lutheran
Suburbs
I
II
III
IT
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
Hospitals
Miscellaneous
Number
Children
5,333

8U3
116

1,602
51
13U
21*
U6
298
386
613
330
1,085
126
mg.Pb/lOOg.
Mean
5.57

5A7
5.79

5.17
5.19
6.51*
5.75
5.68
U.85
U.70
5.51
5.7P
6.13
5.95
Standard
Deviation
2.05

2.11*
1.80

2.13
1.58
2.51*
1.90
1.53
2.10
1.78
2.36
1.99
2.63
2.15
Variance
fy.19

~*.37
3.2k

ft. 52
2.51
6.li3
3.60
2.33
WO
3.17
5-56
3.9*
6.91
fu6i
                                    75

-------
TABLE 21.  SUMMARY TO SHOW THE OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 MG OR MORE  OF LEAD PER 100




GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE FROM 11,241 CHILDREN IN CLEVELAND,,  ITS SUBURBS AND




EXURBS.  THE HOSPITAL GROUP INCLUDES TEETH EXTRACTED FROM CHILDREN LIVING IN




CLEVELAND.

School
System
CLEVELAND
Public
Catholic
Lutheran
TOTAL
% OCCURRENCE
SUBURBS
I
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
TOTAL
% OCCURRENCE
EXURBS
HOSPITALS
Number
Tested

5,367
854
105
6,326


1,602
134
244
46
298
386
613
330
3,653

177
1,085
Children
8.0+ mg Pb

712
91
21
824


194 •
37
30
6
26
20
90
57
460

28
236
% 8.0+ mg Pb

13.3%
10.7%
20.0%

13.0%

12.1%
27.6%
12.3%
13.0%
8.7%
5.2%
14.7%
17.3%

12.6%
15.8%
21.8%
                                   76

-------
TABLE 22.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SHED TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN

CLEVELAND AND ATTENDING THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS.  THE NUMBER OF TEETH

ALSO REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN TESTED FOR ACCUMULATED LEAD.
                          Number
 Tooth Type + Part        Teeth	0 - U.9      5 - 7*9	&•

 Incisor Crowns
   •without cavities
   or fillings            3,911         39.2         h$.6          15,2

 Molar Crowns
   without cavities
   or fillings              9lU         60.1   .      35.7           %.3

 Molar Crowns
   with cavities
   and/or fillings          225         *»8.0         te.7           9-3

 Incisor Roots
   •with and without
   cavities end/or
   fillings                  99         28.3         52*5          19-2

 Molar Roots
   with and without
   cavities and/or
   fillings	$±	31.5	50.0	3.8.5

 TOTAL                    5,203

             (ALL CHILDREN)               U3.0         ^3.9           13.1
                                   77

-------
TABLE 23.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SHED TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN

CLEVELAND AND ATTENDING CLEVELAND CATHOLIC SCHOOLS.  THE NUMBER OF TEETH ALSO

REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN TESTED FOR ACCUMULATED LEAD.
                                  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN MG/100G
                        Number
Tooth Type + Part  '    Teeth      0 - U.9      5 - 7-9	&-

Incisor Crowns
  •without cavities
  or fillings            620        U5.Q         h2.1           12.9

Molar Crowns
  •without cavities
  or fillings            1^5        56.6         36,6            6.9

Molar Crowns
  •with  cavities
  and/or fillings         51        66.?         31.**            2.O

Incisor Roots
  with  and without
  cavities and/or
  fillings                6         50.0         50.0            0,0

Molar Roots
  with  and without
  cavities and/or
fillings
TOTAL
6
828
83.3

16.7

0.0
-
% OCCURRENCE (ALL CHILDREN)           U8.6?         ^0.35         11,0
                                     78

-------
TABLE 24.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SHED TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN

CLEVELAND AND ATTENDING CLEVELAND LUTHERAN SCHOOLS.  THE NUMBER OF TEETH ALSO

REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN TESTED FOR ACCUMULATED LEAD.
 Tooth Type + Part
Number
Teeth
                                     PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN MG/100G
0 - *v.9     5 - 7.9
 Incisor Crowns
   •without cavities
   or fillings

 Molar Crowns
   •without cavities
   or fillings

 Molar Crowns
   with cavities
   and/or fillings

 Incisor Roots with
   with and without
   cavities and/or
   fillings

 Molar Roots
   with and without
   cavities and/or
   fillings	
 21
  8
           3H-9
  52 A
  37.5
            0.0
          100.0
33.3
62.5
              0.0
              0.0
                         20.5
0,0
           100.0
             0.0
 TOTAL

 % OCCURRENCE  (ALL CHILDREN)
           37.7
             U3.0
                                     79

-------
TABLE 25.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SHED TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN

SUBURBS  OF CLEVELAND.  THE NUMBER OF TEETH ALSO REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF

CHILDREN TESTED  FOR ACCUMULATED LEAD
                       Number      Percent occurrence of lead in mg/lOOg
 Tooth Type + Fart     Teeth	0 - U.9	5 -7«9	8+

 Incisor Crowns
   without cavities
   or fillings         2,85^         U2.1          U2.4             15.5

 Molar Crowns
   without cavities
   or fillings           ^35         62.9          33.9              3.2

 Molar Crowns
   with cavities
   and/or fillings       203         56.5          32.5             11.0

 Incisor Roots
   with and without
   cavities and/or
   fillings               k2         53.5          23.0             23.6

 Molar Roots
   with and without
   cavities and/or
   fillings               U3         5^-5          ^3-0              2.3
   TOTAL               3,577


   OCCURRENCE (ALL CHILDREN)          36.2           1+2.3             21.6
                                     80

-------
TABLE 26.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE  OF LEAD IN SHED AND EXTRACTED TEETH OP

CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONS OR TREATED AT 5 DENTAL CLINICS IN CLEVEIAND.

THE NUMBER OF TEETH REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN TESTED
                        Number1    percent occurrence of lead in mg/lOOg
 Tooth Type + Part     Teeth	O - fr.9       5"'- 7-9	&*•

  Incisor Crowns
   •without cavities
   and/or fillings       165          1*3.0          1*1.8              15.2

 Molar Crowns
   without cavities
end/or fillings
Molar Roots
157
5^7
50.1*
30.0
1*0.6
1*3.0
9.1
27.1
   TOTAL                   869



% OCCURRENCE (ALL CHILDREN)           36.2           ^2.3              21.6
                                    81

-------
TABLE 27.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS OF




TEETH NOT HAVING CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS FOR CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

School
X- 2
X- 3
X- 4
X- 5
X- 6
X- 7
X- 8
X- 9
X-10
X-ll
X-12
X-13
X-14
X-15
X-16
X-17
X-18
X-19
X-20
Number
Teeth
20
32
35
39
84
19
23
73
29
38
36
25
28
94
38
13
34
40
26
0 - 4.9
mg Pb/lOOg
55.0
21.9
34.3
51.3
59.5
36.8
43.5
50.7
41.4
28.9
41.7
60.0
32.1
35.1
52.6
38.5
38.2
50.0
53.8
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
30.0
43.8
57.1
35.9
34.5
42.1
52.2
32.9
55.2
52.6
44.4
32.0
67.9
52.1
34.2
38.5
47.1
37.5
30.8
8.0 + mg Pb
15.0
34.4
8.6
12.8
6.0
21.1
4.3
16.4
3.4
18.4
13.9
8.0
0.0
12.8
13.2
23.1
14.7
12.5
15.4
                                    82

-------
TABLE  27 (CONTINUED)

School
X-21
X-22
X-23
X-24
X-25
X-26
X-27
X-28
X-29
X-30
X-31
X-32
X-33
X-34
X-35
X-36
X-37
X-38
X-39
X-40
Number
Teeth
12
57
27
5
35
2k
5
25
Hi
20
37
19
15
29
66
26
9
27
18
63
0 - 4.9
mg Pb/lOOg
33.3
56.1
55.6
100.0
1*2.9
29.2
60,0
52.0
57.1
25.0
35.1
21.1
66.7
2H.1
k2.k
61.5
33.3
1.0.7
3'°-. 9
17-5
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
25-0
38.6
37.0
0.0
U2.9
58.3
IKXO
Ho.o
35-7
30.0
56.8
1,2.1
26 . 7
51-7
36. k
26,9
kk.k
1(8.1
55.6
65.1
8.0 + mg Pb
5-3
7-l|
0,0
1U.3
12.5
0.0
8.0
7-1
It 5 • 0
8.1
36.8
6.7
2U.1
21.2
11.5
22.2
11 . 1
5.6
17-5
                            eoni,i iiur.-d on nc/.l  }i-j.:r,^.

-------
TABLE 27  (CONTINUED)
School
Cleveland public
X-41
X-42
X-43
X-44
X-45
X-46
X-47
X-48
X-49
X-50
X-51
X-52
X-53
X-54
X-56
X-57
X-58
X-59
X-60
Number
Teeth
18
17
16
9
35
15
lH
30
26
36
39
13
H2
21
66
3H
HH
20
28
0 - h.9
0.0
Ul . 2
6.3
11 '.1
77-1
U6.7
35-7
66 . 7
H6.2
HH.H
30.8
l^.H
H2.9
28.6
12.1
MM
Hj • 2
H '; . 0
50.0
5 - 7-9
77-8
52.9
68.8
77.8
20.0
1.6.7
35-7
33-3
38.5
Hi. 7
59-0
8H.6
Ho. 5
52. H
60.6
'•17.1
50.0
35.0
39.3
8.0 -H m- 1'b
22.2
5-9
25-0
11.1
2-9
6.7
28.6
0.0
15. H
13.9
10.3
0.0
16.7
19.0
27-3
8.8
6.8,
20 . 0
10.7
                    c:ou1-i
            84

-------
TABLE 27 (CONTINUED)
School
Cleveland Public
X-61
X-62
X-63
X-66
X-67
X-68
X-69
X-70
X-71
X-72
X-73
X-74
X-75
X-76
X-77
X-78
X-79
X-80
Number
Teeth
25
11
38
5
16
19
23
140
•ho
ho
h2
18
6
hh
9
36
31
1
0 - IK 9
mg Pb/lOOg
36.0
36. )|-
21.1
60.0
25.0
57-9
21.7
77-5
30.0
35-0
21 . h
55-6
33-3
'•5.5
55-6
2^.0
61.3
0.0
5 - 7-9
mg Pb/lOOg
hh.o
27.3
55-3
20.0
62.5
26,3
60.9
17.5
55-0
57-5
5U.8
33-3
50.0
ltf.2
33-3
66.7
29.0
100.0
8,0 ^ mg pb
20.0
36. h
23-7
20.0
12.5
15.8
17-lt
5-0
15-0
7.5
23-8
11.1
16.7
11. ^
in .1
8.3
9.7
0.0
                    continued on next
            85

-------
TABLE 27  (CONTINUED)
School
Cleveland Public
X-81
X-82
X-84
X-85
X-86
X-88
X-89
X-90
X-91
X-92
X-93
X-94
X-95
X-96
X-97
X-98
X-99
X-100
Number
Teeth
28
32.
59
22
21
18
62'
2k
29
9
),6
15
27
20
55
30
25
22
0 - 4.9
rug Pb/1003
28.6
3-1-3
15-3
31.8
19.0
11.1
29.0
25-0
10.3
55-6
.17. 'i
20.0
7H.1
50.0
29.1
33-3
32.0
36.ii
5 - 7-9
mg Pb/100e
50.0
56.3
50.8
'•5.5
57-1
72.2
51.6
1,5-8
58.6
M< . n
60.9
66.7
22.2
H5-0
58.2
56.7
56.0
50.0
8.0+ rng Pb
21. k
12.5
33-9
22.7
23-8
16.7
19. h
29.2
31-0
0.0
21.7
13.3
3-7
5.0
12.7
:i o . o
12.0
L3-6
                          cent inn (.•(!  on nnxl. p:J ,"•/?.
            86

-------
TABLE 27 (CONTINUED)

School
X-101
X-102
X-103
X-104
X-105
X-106
X-107
X-108
X-109

X-110
X-lll
X-112

X-113

X-114


X-115
X-116

X-117

X-118

X-119

X-120

Number 0-4.9
Teeth mg Pb/lOOg
2*
79'
1
Ho
39
63
11
53

12
Ik
12

19

12

'sO

-J/>

36

22

33

78

39
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
25.0 62.5
60.8 35. u
100.0 0.0
H2.5 Hj.o
H3-6 H3.6
HH.H 39.7
-10.2 5)1.5
'l7.2 28.3

66.7 25.0
50.0 28.6
25.0 58.3

31.6 H2.1

50 .0 50 . 0

) | I ' Q ) 1 O '
- • -'
<><

HH.H Hi. 7

'10.9 1|5.^

H2.H H2.H

39.7 51-3

57-9 36.8
8.0 H- mg Pb
12.5
3.8
0.0
12.5
12.0
15.9
27-3
21;. 5

8.3
21. U
16.7

26.3

0.0

i O ( .
1 f. . _;

2, . .
1 J i)

1 3 . ( <

15-2

9.0

5-3
                      conlimuxl on next,  pa/;o.





        87

-------
               TABLE 27 (CONTINUED)
School
X-121
X-122
X-123
X-124
X-125
X-126
X-128
X-129
X-130
X-131
X-132
X-133
X-134
X-135
TOTAL:
% .TNr.TDF.NrF.
Number
Teeth
52
33 ;
ia
27
53
51
38
39
6
32
17
7
39
15
3,911

0-4.9
mg Pb/lOOg
' 3^-6
h2.h
51.2
1U.8
73.6
29. h
23-7
17-9
50.0
37-5
17.6
28.6
•28.2
33-3

39-2
. 5-7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
38.5
33-3
in. 5
kk.h
2k. 5
' U3-1
57.9
51-3
50.0
ho. 6
6^.7
71. k
H8.7
60.0

45. 6
8.0 + mg Pr
26.9
2U.2
' 7-3
U0.7
1-9
27.5
18. U
30.8
0.0
21.9
17-6
0.0
23.1
6.7

15-2
(All children)

-------
TABLE 28.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS OF




TEETH NOT HAVING CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS FROM CHILDREN IN THE CLEVELAND




PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS.

School
XI- 1
XI- 2
XI- 3
XI- 4
XI- 5
XI- 6
XI- 7
XI- 8
XJ- 9
XI-10
XI-11
XI-12
XI-13
XI-14
XI-15
XI-16
XI-17
XI-18
XI-19
XI-20
Number
Teeth
18
2
83
53
7
25
22
13
9
3
31
31
7
17
15
8
17
18
2
19
0 - 4.9
mg Pb/100 g
38.9
50.0
45.8
37.7
42.9
20.0
22.7
30.8
77.8
66.7
54.8
42.2
42.9
35.3
40.0
37.5
47.1
66.7
0.0
26.3
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/100 g
33.3
50.0
45.8
43.4
57.1
56.0
68.2
38.5
11.1
33.3
29.0
51.6
57.1
41.2
46.7
12.5
41.2
33.3
100.0
63.2
8.0+ mg Pb/lOOg
27.8
0.0
8.4
18.9
0.0
24.0
9.1
30.8
11.1
0.0
16.1
3.2
0.0
23.5
13.3
50.0
11.8
0.0
0.0
10.5
                                     89

-------
                          TABLE 28 (CONTINUED)
School
XI-21
XI-22
XI-23
XI-2U
XI-25
XT-26
XI-27
XI-28
XI-29
XI-30
XI-31
XI -32
XI -33
XI -3^
Xl-35
xi -36
XI-37
XI -38
XI-39
XI -UO
XI -Ul
xi-te
XI-1^3
Number
Teeth
6
11
11
llf
h
12
11
10
1
5
7
1U
11
33
1
1
15
8
9
5
9
10
12
o - U.9
rag Pb/lOOg
66.7
9.1
27.3
61*. 3
25.0
66.7
U5.5
60.0
0.0
20.0
28.6
U2.9
U5.5
60.6
100.0
100.0
73.3
75.0
66.7
60.0
33.3
60.0
Ui.7
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
16.7
81.8
1*5.5
21. ^
50.0
33-3
5U.5
to.o
0.0
80.0
57-1
50.0
U5.5
21.2
0.0
0.0
26.7
12.5
33.3
Uo.o
WA
30.0
33.3
8,0 +
mg Pb/lOOg
16.7
9.1
27.3
1U.3
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10O.O
0.0
1U.3
7.1
9.1
18.2
0,0
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.0
0.0
22.2
1O.O
25.0
TOTAL
620
                                      90

-------
TABLE  29.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS




WITHOUT CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS IN LUTHERAN SCHOOLS OF CLEVELAND AND ITS




SUBURBS.  THE ASTERISK INDICATES LUTHERAN SCHOOLS IN SUBURBS OR EXURBS

School
l
*XfcL- 1
XLI- 2
XII- 3
xii- h
*m- 5
*xn- 6
*xri- 7
xrtr 8
*XIL- 9
Kuciber
Teeth
13
18
9
11 -
7
ll»
3
1
7
0 - U.9
mg Pb/lOOg
30.8
72.2
33-3
36. U
28.6
0.0
33-3
0.0
28.6
5 - 7-9
rag Fo/lOOg
69.2
22.2
55.6
18.2
28.6
50.O
66.7
: loo.o
71. 'r
8.0 +
rcg Fo/lOOg
0.0
•5-6
n.i
H5.5
It2.9
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTAL                83




% OCCURRENCE                       3^.9             *&.6              20.5
                                   91

-------
 TABLE 30.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWS OF TEETH WHICH




 DID NOT HAVE A CAVITY AND/OR A FILLING IN 2,85U CHILDREN IN 8 CLEVELAND




 SUBURBS.  THE COLUMN "NUMBER OF TEETH" ALSO REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF




 CHILDREN TESTED. FOR ACCUMULATED LEAD

School
I
III
IV
V
VI
VII
"VIII
IX
TOTAL
Number Percent occurrence of lead in mg/lOOg tooth tissue
Teeth 0 - U.9 5 - 7-9 &•
1,238
110
196
33
212
30?
1190
. 268
2,85^
H8.4
23.6
3^.7
2U.2
58.0
, 59-6
hk.7
U3.6

36.9
1*3-6
52.6
60.6
31.6
3M
39.2
39>8

1U.7
32,7
12.8
15-2.
IDA
5-?
16.1
' 16.7

•"to OCCURRENCE               te.l                    kZ.k                15.5
                                        92

-------
TABLE 31.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS



WITHOUT CAVITIES AND /OR FILLINGS IN THE SCHOOLS OF SUBURB I PUBLIC




SCHOOL SYSTEM

Suburb
and
School
;
1- I
I- II
I- III
I- IV
I- V
i- yi
I- VII
I -VIII
I- IX
I- X
I- XI
I- XII
I -XIII
I- XIV
I- XV
I- XVI
I -XVII
Number
' .Teeth
68
2k
50
&.
9k
68
56
73
3k
75
1°
36-
6k
88
81
31
6k
dp Occurrence
o - k.9
mg Pb/lOOg
30.9
83.3
kk.Q
>»7.5
27.7
57A
50.0
5U.8
6k.f
36.0
30.0
30.6
57.8
36 A
59-3
80.6
56.3
of amounts of tooth
5 - 7-9
. mg Pb/lOOg
Itf-l '
16.7
kk.O
39.0 -
50.0
23.5
39.3
31.5
23/5
la. 3
60.0
fcL.7
25.0
5^5
25.9
ia.9
35.9
lead (rog/lOOg)
8.0 + mg Pb
S2,X
0.0
X2cO
X3.6
22,3
X9.1.
3.0.7
3-3.7
OJ.,8
22.7
10.0
£7,8
'Jtl'K
9-3.
Ui.8
6.5
7.8
                                   93

-------
TABLE 3]  (CONTINUED)
Occurrence of amounts of tooth lead (mg/XOOg)
Suburb
and
School
i-xyin
i
I- XIX
X- XX
T- xxr
•
TOEAL
Number
.Teeth
7U
50,.
63
76
1,238
o - l*.9
wg pb/lOOg
52.7
l»6.o
U2.9
59.2

5-7*9
mg Pb/lOOg- 8,0 -j- wg Pb
33.8 ia.?
32,0 22vO
I»6.0 -. 3JL.X
. 3^.2 6.6
-
% OCCURRENCE **8.U 36,9 £!f,«r
         94

-------
TABLE 32.   PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS
WITHOUT CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS

Suburb
and
School
SUBURB III
III- 1
III- 2
TOTAL
io OCCURRENCE
SUBURB IV
IV - 1
IV- - 2
IV - 3
iv - 4
IV - 5
TOTAL
% OCCURRENCE
SUBURB V
V - 1
TOTAL
% OCCURRENCE
Number
Teeth

63
47
no

.
34
41
66
49
6
196


33
33

% Occurrence
0 - 4.9
mg Pb/100g

22.2
25.5
-
23.9

44.1
41.5
40.9
18.4
0.0

32.7

24.2

24.2
of amounts of
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/100g

46.0
4o.4

43.2

38.2
56.1
51.5
55.1
100.0

52.6

60.6

60.6
tooth lead (mg/lOOg)
8.0 +
mg Pb/lOOg

31.7
34.0

32.9

17.6
2.4
7.6
26.5
0.0
-
12.8

15.2

15.2
                                   95

-------
                           TABLE 32




                          Occurrence of amounts of tooth lead (mg/lOOg)
Suburb
and
School
Number
Teeth
0 - h.9
mg Pb/lOOg
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg
8.0 +
mg Pb/lOOg
SUBURB VI
VI
*
VI
VI
VI
VI
VI
- 1

- 2
- 3
- h
- 5
- 6
56

36
53
30
27
10
76.8

63.9
37.7
56.7
51-9
60.0
1^.3

27.8
49.1
36.7
33.3
30.0
8.9

8.3
13.2
6.7
1^.8
10.0
TOTAL




% OCCURRENCE
212
             58.0
31.6
10. If
                                     96

-------
 TABLE 33.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS

 WITHOUT  CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS


Suburb
and
School
SUBURB VII
VII- 1
VII- 2
VII- 3
VII- U
VII- 5
VII- 6
VII- 7
VII- 8
vii- 9
VII-10
. vii-ii

Number
Teeth

ho
33
26
U9
18
2k
35
30
32
18
2
% Occurrence of
0 - 4.9
mg Pb/lOOg

57-5
U8.5
73-1
28.6
6l,l
70.8
65.7
86.7
62.5
77.8
0.0
amounts of tooth lead (mg/lOOg)
5 - 7,9
mg Pb/lOOg

37.5
*tf.5
23.3.
65,3
27-8
25-0
25/f
13.3
31.3
16 X
100,0
8.0 -h mg Ft

5.0
6.1
3.8
6.1
11,1
It.2
8,6
o.o
6.3
5.6
0,0
TOTAL:
% OCCURRENCE
307
               59-6
5,5
                                     97

-------
TABLE 34.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF AMOUNTS OF LEAD IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS





WITHOUT CAVITIES AND/OR FILLINGS

% Occurrence of ajnounts of tooth lead (mg/lOOg)
Suburb
and
School
SUBURB. VIII
-,VIII- 1
VIII- 2
VIII- 3
VIII- If
VIII- 5
VIII- 6
viii- 7
viii- 8
viii- 9
VIII-1Q...
TOTAL:
% OCCURRENCE

Number
Teeth

63
15
57
*9 '
81
23
61
1*6
39
56
1*90


o - i*.9
mg Pb/lOOg

27.0
60.0
75. **
1*6.9
32.1
52.2
1*9.2
**5.7
i*6.2
35.7

1*1*.7

5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg

52A
26.7
21.1
3**.7
1*3.2
3^.8
1*1.0
^3:5
28.2
1*8.2

39.2- -

8.0 + mg Pb

20.6
13.3
3.5
18A
2l*,7
13.0
9.8
10.9
25,6
16.1

16.1
                                     98

-------
 TABLE "35.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF LEAD  IN SHED INCISOR CROWNS WITHOUT CAVITIES

 AND/OR FILLINGS

Suburb
and
School
SUBURB IX
IX- 1
IX- 2
IX- 3
IX- k
IX- 5
IX- 6
. ix- 7
ix- 8
ix- 9
IX-10
Number
Teeth

22
15
28 "
17
3.8
15
15
30.
5U
5^
% Occurrence
0 - U.9
mg Pb/lOOg

77.3
U6.7
32.1
16.5
W.I
Uo.o
U6.7
13-3
5.6
51.9
of amounts of tooth
5 - 7.9
mg Pb/lOOg

9^1
U6.7
50.0
23.5
38.9
26.7
53.3
66.7
6l.l
22,2
lead (mg/lOOg)
8,0 + mg Pb

13.6
6.7
17.9
0.0
16.7
33.3
0.0
20.0
33.3
25.9
TOTAL:          268
 % OCCURRENCE
39.8
16,7
                                    99

-------
c3

CO
CO

$
o
co
CO

a




























































-d
0)
-P
O
03
h

-C
10
to
si
-P
o
0
-P
0)
.£
bD
0)
5
bO
«
•iH
'd
r4
O
O
O
a
0)
o
0)
-d
'o
-P
d)
o
0)

cc
ft
CO
o

in



i





bO
O
O
H

£


in oo
O O
CO
i -d~
co in
in ON
oo in
in ON
oo m
in ON
rH
OO CO
in ^t
H H
H in
sj -
rH CO
CM H
OO
in i
H
0
i o>\
? ?
00 1
ON
H
i
O
H
H t-
m j-
in ON
H -*
vo vo
CM ON
rH
vo t>-
c\l in
CM rH
VO J-
H t--
H H
in H
t~- in
H
H 00
CO CM
H H
H VD
CM rH
CM H
O CO
ON -*
^
1 00
IT ON
0 t-
CO 1
ON
CM
1
O
CM
"te^. '•feS
CO O
VD m
rH H
ON 00
* *
O CO
o -3-
o t>-
rH
VO H
in in
H H
H in
in vo
i i i~H
o oo
-3" OO
H H
ON co
in oo
rH H
O\ vo
O -3-
CM H
in ON
t>- CO
C\J t-
° rH
? 1
CO 1
ON
co
1
o
oo
O CM
"CM CM
ON m
H CO
^j- oo
VO t-
CO CM
in CM
rH H
CM ON
rH 00
H rH
co -=r
CM CO
H rH
O OO
rH m
OJ rH
CO H
CO OO
CM rH
o -s-
t-- m
H CO
0 0
rH
-6^. "6^
5 £
co i
_^
-=r
i
O
-C"
CO S"
CO ON
H H
O
CM
H CM
in in
in co
CJN O
* rH
^t ON
CO H
rH
-* CO
rH . H
H H
VO J-
CM ON
CM rH
ON -H-
ON O
Cv; CM
H J-
CM f-
co €>
° rl
If
ON
IT\

O
in
rH CO
in in
rH H
CO rH
» »
rH CV!
CM O
CO ^t
VD VD
00 t-
ax rH
VO CJN
ON CO
CO CO
rH
IfN t^-
CM ON
CM H
0^ ON
.CM CM
CO CM
ON CO
00 CO
rH
CO O
rH CO
H
•^- "69.
H- ON
0 [-
CO 1
0
VD
i
O
vo

-------









( 	 s
1
o
u
vO
ro
1
H









racted.
?
0
1
0]
w
-1
£
0
- -
CO i
ON
ON
1
O
ON
H CM
CM CM
CM CM
* •
rH rH
CO
1
I-l
H CO
co r>-
• •
o o
vo CO
CM J-
p CO
CM H
H C-
CO O
CO CO
VO O
CO* VO
CVI rH
VO
1 VO
rH
4- ON
0 t>-
CO 1
ON
%
i
O
d
rH
t#2. -^9.
vo in
0 0
UN
1
CM
in
CM
in
cvi
0
1
o
H
~=t O
r>- o
rH H
t- 0
<° 8
in in
co S-
^t CO
^j- in
to ^
in
i t-
^e. -^
c$ g>
CO 1
ON
H
H
l
O
rH
rJ
vf ^
O O
1 •
cr
ON
1 •
rH
O CO
t *
-3- co
t-
1 •
in
O O\
CM co
•H H
O rH
8 $
O CO
OJ O
m CM
o ^t
OJ ON
rH
H
'in
rH
tsS- ^8.
CO 1
ON
CVI
H
1
O
CM
rH
•^- -^-
CO O
O rH
CM
1 •
1 •
vo
OJ
1
t- ON
» ft
VO VO
O H
% 3
CO H
r? 3
t- VO
vo o
.3 CO
•
O CO
• o in
OJ H
CO 0-
co ON
± °^
0 C-
co i
•
•f
*- 0
co
rH
                                     ON
                                      •^
                                     CO
                                     VO
                                     -a-
in
j-
-d-
                                      CD
                                     •P
                                          OJ
                                          CO
                                          •P
                                           O
           CO

           t^
           in
           H
           CM
J-    l>-   O
CM     •   CO
oj    m   ^t
ON
 *

CM
                                                      ON
                                          co   co   -a-
                                            •    in
                                          rH    t-    O
                                          rH          H
                                     ON  ,3-    ON   co
                                     vo     •    m     •
                                     co   ON   co    H
                                                      rH
t^-
cO
•**

t-
CO


o
CO
HK
rH
OS
t-


co

H
»
r^

O

d
CM
t-
%
«

CM
*
CM
H
UN
d
-a-
CO
ON
CO
OJ
OJ
•%
rH
in
ON
J-
i-T
in
*^J*" *
in

c^
CO
CO
»
CM
H
C-
«
VO
tH,

in
«
8

in
«
c-

vo
d
                                                CN    CN
            CD
           -p

           fi
 CO
-p

fi
101

-------
TABLE 37.  PEARSON COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION OF AGE AT TIME OF TOOTH LOSS




AND THE AMOUNT OF LEAD IN TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN SUBURBS AND CLEVELAND.'




THE HOSPITAL GROUP INCLUDED CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONS AND CHILDREN WHOSE




TEETH WERE EXTRACTED AT THE DENTAL CLINICS OF FIVE HOSPITALS WITHIN CLEVELAND




THE NUMBER REPRESENTS  THE  NUMBER OF CHILDREN

Suburban School
Systems
T
II
\
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
Cleveland Public Schools
Parochial Schools
Lutheran
Roman Catholic
Hospi'tals
Other
Correlation
- .3710
- .W#
- .1U53
- .2392
- .'5326
- .2803
- .1809
- .307^
- .1*399
- ,2392

- .2377
- .2799
.0206
- ,2306
Number
1,W
*3
128
223
h6
289
376
57S
325
U,9^9

116
786
1,007
122
Significance
-001
.001
.051
.001
.001
.001
.001
.001
.O01
.001

.005
' .001
,256
.005
                                   102

-------
'.CABLE 38.  SPEARMAN COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION OF AGE AT TIME OF TOOTH LOSS





AND AMOUNT OF LEAD IN TEETH OF CHILDREN LIVING IN SUBURBS AND CLEVELAND.




THE HOSPITAL GROUP INCLUDED CHILDREN IN INSTITUTIONS AND CHILDREN WHOSE




TEETH WERE EXTRACTED AT THE DENTAL CLINICS OF 5 HOSPITALS WITHIN CLEVELAND.




THE "NUMBER" COLUMN ALSO REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN

Suburban School
Systems
I
II
III
IV
V
"VI
VII
VIII
IX
Correlation
» »U03^
- .3087
- .1852
- .228k
' - .5396
- -3217
- .1690
- .31^2
- .U591
Number
1,1^7
*3
128
223
k6
• 289
376
575
325
SI gni.fi cane e
.001
.002
.018
.001
.001
.001
.001
.001
.001
                                   103

-------
 TABLE 39.  PERCENT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF TOOTH LEAD BY AGE FOR 2,120
 BOYS AND 2,799 GIRLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.  THE NUMBER
 OF TEETH ALSO REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN

AJge
5
5
6
.6 .
7
7
Sex
Boys
Cirls
Boys
Girls
. •
Boys
"Girls
Amount of
-1.0 - 4.9
No. %
56
86
167
259
181
181
27.9
27.3
30.1
36.6
38.4
35.3
lead in mg Pb/100g.-
5.0-7.9 8.0+
No . % No. %
89
151
287
323
218
265
44
47
51
45
46
51
.3
.9
.8
. 7
.3
,7
56
78
100
125
72
67
27.
24.
18.
17.
15.
13.
8
7
0
7
3
0
Total
No. %
201
315
554
707
471
513
9.
11.
26.
25.
22.
18.
5
2
1
3
2
3
  8      Boys   129   45 5   126   44.4    29    10.2     284    13.4
  8      Girls  181   35.3   16A   42,8    38     9.2     383   -13.7
9-12
9-12
Boys
Girls
368 .
500
60.3
56.8
210
335
34
38
.4
.0
32
46
5
5
.2
.2
610
881
28.8
31.5
Total  Boys     901   42.5   930   43.9     289  13.6  2,120
Total  Girls   1207   43.1  1228   44.2     354  12.6  2,799
                                104

-------
 TABLE  40. PERCENT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF TOOTH LEAD BY AGE FOR 710 BOYS





 AND 771 GIRLS IN SUBURB I PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.   THE NUMBER OF TEETH ALSO




 REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN

Age
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9-12
9-12
Sex
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls'
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Boys
Girls
Amount
-1.0 -
No. %
24
30
73
92.
64
66
48
58
173
194
• 34
3' 3
34
41
47
49
59
73
81
78
of Lead in mg Pb/lOOg.
4.9 5.0-7.9 8.0+
No. % No. %
.8
.3
.4
.6
.4
.3
.3
.4
.2
.5
27
40
94
82
60
52
27
13
37
47
39.
44.
44.
37.
44.
38.
33.
16.
17.
19.
1
4
3
1
4
8
3
5
4
0
18
20
45
47
11
16
6
8
3
6
26
22
21
21
8
11
7
10
1
2
. 1
.2
.2
.3
.1
.9
.4
.1
.4
.4
Total
No. %
69
90
212
221
135
134
81
79
213
247
9.
11.
30.
28.
19.
17.
11.
10,
30.
32.
7
7
0
7
0
4
4
2
0
0
Total Boys    382    53.8  245    34.5     83  '  11.7    710




Total Girls   440    57.0  234    30.4     97    12.6    771
                                 105

-------
TABLE 41.  SUMMARY OF HRISK, RACIAL, ECOF., HWAY, AND IND. FOR 135 RJBLIC




ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SCHOOL
X- 1
X- 2
X- 3
x- h
X- 5
x- 6
x- 7
x- 8
X- 9
X-10
X-ll
X-12
X-13
X-l^
x-15
X-16
x-l?
X-18
x-19
X-20
HRISK
89.0
88.6
88.6
92.8
90.0
78.5
98.0
85.it
97.7
89.5
100.0
ifU.7
97.2
1^.9
52.2
98.9
97.3
35.9
97.0
97.0
RACIAL
U5.0
59.2
3.8
0.3
100.0
93.^
0.2
0.0
98.7
100.0
O.U
92.5
91.3
1.3
98.0
0.1
0.9
38.0
86.1
0.0
BOON
10.9
10.9
10.9
9.1
10.8
11.2
12.6
U.2
10.2
9*
-
11.2
9.3
ll.l
11. h
7.3
9.^
12. U
9.1
9.0
HWAY
116.0
13^.5
117.0
71.9
0.0
13.5
13.5
0.0
58.0
35.1
22.6
32.2
6h.h
26.8
la.o
35.5
39.1
1^
51.0
36.8
IND
6
l
6
1
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
0
1
h
2
2
3
1
                                   106

-------
                 TABLE 4i (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL     HRISK     RACIAL     ECON     HWAY     IND
X-21
X-22
X-23
X-24
X-25
X-26
X-27
X-28
X-29
X-30
X-31
X-32
X-33
X-3U
x-35
X-36
x-37
X-38
X-39
X-Uo
; 98.4
S7.3
81.7
89.0
63.1
94.0
44.9
99.1
97.2
97.3
51.4
97.6
94.1
83.2
81.7
74.5
98.5
54.1
97.5
97.5
74.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
89.5
0.0
0.5
0.8
0.2
0.0
98.4
97.0
0.0
0.2
97.9
0.8
4.2
10.0
9.5
12.1
5.4
5.3
9.4
11.1
9.0
7.2
9.5
11.9
5.3
7.6
10.7
9.4
3.4
7.9
12.9
5.1
9.5
0.0
77.7
0.0
57.7
22.6
0.0
0.0
51.3
0.0
30.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
88.6
29.0
0.0
0.0
8.4
66.3
57.0
16
I
I
3
3
0
0
4
1
0
0
12
0
3
3.
1
0
0
15
6
                         107

-------
SCHOOL
K-Ul
X-42
X-lf3
X-1A
X-^5
x-i*6
x-Vf
- x-W
x-^9
x-50
X-51
X-52
X-53
X-5^
X-55
X-56
X-57
X-58
x-59
x-6o
HRISK
83.5
99.6
78.6
15.4
71.5
97.9
84.7
9'7.9
44.7
54.1
99.3
99.5
98.4
97.5
65.2
99.1
78.6
98.0
76.3
97.0
TABLE 41 (CONTINUED)
RACIAL ECON HWAY
90.7
42,3
0.5
0.0
75.5
0.8
93.3
99.1
97.5
97.8
0.5
0.5
95.5
92.2
0.0
99.0
96.2
99.7
2.9
0.0
10.3
10.1
11.1
16.2
10.3
9.2
10.6
9.4
11.2
12.9
6.6
6.6
10.0
10.2
13.8
11.0
11.1
9.8
16.9
9.0
82.7
0,0 .
13.5
0.0
16.0
36.8
123.0
0.0
62.2
52.6 .
103.3
0.0
37.5
87.5
26.5
93.?.
83.0
21.2
120.4
36.7
IND
1
8
0
0
4
1
3
1
2
0
8
6
3
6
o"
1
6
3
X
1
108

-------
TABLE 4i (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
X-61
X-62
X-63
x-6it
x-65
x-66
x-6?
x-68
x-69
X-70
X-71
X-72
X-73
X-71^
X-75
X-76
X-77
X-78
x-79
X-80
HRISK
90.3
22.3
99.6
89.0
95.3
95.6
99.0
96.7
98.9
98.2
94.0
90.1
97.1
46. 5
3.0
81.7
97.2
81.7
98.1
36.1
RACIAL
29.6
46.5
58.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.7
69.6
0.0
94.0
96.1
71.4
0.0
96.6
0.7
96.1
0.2
0.0
ECON
10.2
4.6
9.6
5.4
9*8
6.6
5.9
6.6
8.2
7.8
8.9
10.3
9.3
9.9
8.3
11.1
7.2
12.1
5.0
4.7
HWAY
38.0
133.4
0.0
0.0
55.6
36.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
81.1
53.9
173.9
107.8
54.3
0.0
39.7
0.0
160.0
103.3
0.0
IND
1
14
7
1
Z
Z
12
2
0
10 .
3.
2
6
0
J.
3.
0
1
*-6
6
         109

-------
                      TABLE 4i (CONTINUED)





SCHOOL     HRISK       RACIAL       ECON    HWAY       IND
X- 81
X- 82
x- 83
X- 8U
x- 85
X- 86
x- 87
- X- 88
X- 89
x- 90
x- 91
x- 92
X- 93
X- 9^
x- 95
X- 96
x- 97
X- 98
X- 99
X-100
70.9
96.7
99.3
71.2
76.5
83.9
98.8
98.2
98.3
67.7
97.2
96.3
91.6
99.1
72.0
97.8
99.1
97.9
78.6
58.2
98.8
0.7
0.6
98.2
90.2
97.9
29.0
0.1
93.8
0.5
99.1
0.6
0.4
72.0
94.0
0.0
80.9
0.0
96.0
63.1
12.6
6.6
6.9
11.6
10.3
11.1
9.4
9.1
9.3
10.3
9.3
10.4
8.6
9.5
12.1
8.3
9.0
9.8
11.1
8,2
24.8
0.0
0.0
67*3
55.3
100.8
118,4
0.0
108.0
33.6
40.3
6X.7
100 ,B
76,6
68.0
0,0
18.9
0.0
91.8
Cl.4
J.
5
0
Z
3
X
5
Z
1.
0
Z
0
0
3
Z
Z
6
0
5
4
                                110

-------
TABLE 4i  (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
X-101
X-102
X-103
X-10U
X-105
x-io6
X-107
'X-108
x-109
X-110
x-ni
X-112
X-113
X-llU
X-115
X-116
X-117
x-n8
x-ii9
X-120
HRISK
97.9
54.1
99,5
68.4
81.4
38,2
99.3
59 o7
97.5
100.0
98.3
94,0
85.2
98.5
46,0
99,0
98,8
54.1
23,8
97.5
RACIAL
0.3
82.6
0.0
96.1
0.0
97.5
0.4
87,2
53.8
6.0
48.6
0,0
0.0
95,5
94.9
64 o3
91.6
98,5
96.0
0.2
ECON
9.4
12.9
6.5
12.8
9.5
15.0
6.9
9.4
7.6
9.6
9.0
9,4
4.2
6.0
11.3
7.5
9o4
12.9
12.3
5.1
HWAY
6.4
0.0
17.3
44 .4
42.5
26.6
0,0
0.0
51.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o»o
0.0
0.0
. 59,7
47 *3
0*0
78.3
0.0
IND
3
C
3
1
I
4
0
2
4
4
1A
0
8
4
0
7
3
0
0
5
       111

-------
TABLE 41 (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
X-121
X-122
X-123
X-12U
X-125
X-126
X-127
' - X-128
X-129
X-130
X-131
X-132
X-133
X-131*-
X-135
HRISK
97.5
96.6
91.4
97.2
97.1
95.6
90.1
67.9
94.6
98.?.
73.4
98.9
98.9
99.2
99.3
FACIAL
78.1
98.0
98.0
0.2
85.3
85.3
96.0
98.1
94.1
34.5
100.0
91.0
66.0
4.3
0.5
ECON
7.6
8.8
11.1
6.3
9.3
9.5
10.3
10.6
10.5
7.8
12.9
9.2
6.6
8.6
10 J.
WAY
40.6
31.8
47.5
17.3
66.7
71,9
69.3
17.2
20.6
1.62.7
13,8
13.4
53.9
20.7
0.0
IND
5
22
Z
6
4
7
1
3
7
13
1
5
2
7
Z
          112

-------
TABLE 42 /  SUMMARY OF HRIBK, ECON,  HWAY, AM) IND FOR ^3 ROMAN CATHOLIC



PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS IN CLEVELAND

SCKQQL
XI- 1
XI- 2
XI- 3
XI- U
xi- 5
xi- 6
xi- 7
xi- 8
xi- 9
XI-10
xi -n
XI -12
xi-13
XE-lU
xi -15
xi-l6
xi -17
XI -18
xi -19
XI -20
XI-21 •
HRISK
73.4
97.8
54.1
97.0
99.3
68.4
46.5
81.7
98.4
46.5
44.7
68.4
98.6
84.7
86.4
99.7
78.6
100.0
88.6
90.8
92.4
ECON
12.9
8,3
12.9
10.9
6.6
12.8
11.3
11.1
10,0
11.3
11.2
12.8
7.2
10.6
10.1
9.4
11.1
9.8
9.8
10.2
10.2
WAY
13.8
35.2
0.0
58.8
98.2
53.0
0.0
62.9
-
0.0
63.5
8.8
17.3
89.1
18.9
0.0
86.2
34.1
98.6
63.8
44.2
IND
1
0
0
1
13
1
1
1
7
0
0
0
5
1
1
2
2
2
7.
3
0
                                   113

-------
            TABLE 42  (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
XI-22
XI-23
XI-2U
XI--25
XE-26
XC-27
XI-28
XE-29
XC-30
XC-31
XE-32
XE-33
xt-3*
XE-35
XE-36
XE-37
XE-38
XE-39
xt-Uo
XE-lfl
XE-U2
XI -43
' HRISK
96.6
94.6
97.0
99.3
65.2
100.0
93.7
97.5
88.6
95.6
90.3
71.2
98.2
98.4
93.8
88.6
95.6
95.6
99.5
99.6
97.6
95.5
.ECON
10.3
10.5 '-.
9.0
10.1
13.8
8.9
8.7
9.5
10.4
9,9
9.5
11.6
7.8
10.0
5.2
10.9
9.5
9.5
9.9
10.1
9.8
10.2
HWAY
67.1
20.6
28.2
54.2
13.5
32.7
20.7
57.1
72.1
0.0
63.7
41.3
55.0
19.4
93.6
133.1
102.9
92.4
31,3
0.0
147.4
3.8
IND
6
4
1
6
;°
4
* 7
4
0
3
6
1
. 1
5
15
1
5
5
1
8
8
3
MEAN        87.2          10.1     U6.U     3.1






                     114

-------
TABLE 43.   SUMMARY OF HRISK, ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR 10 LUTHERAN PA.ROCHIAL
SCHOOLS IN CLEVELAND AND THE SUBURBS

SCHOOL -
XII- 1
XII- 2
XII- 3
XII- ^
XII- 5
xii- 6
XII- 7
XII- 8
xii- 9
XII -10
HRISK
36.7
90.1
49.0
73.3
5.4
31.6
89.4
17.7
35.0
79.6
ECON
16.2
10.3
11.9
12.9
17.2
19 .3
12.1
13. 7
14.1
12.4
HWAY
~
50.3
47.9
13.8
0.0
0.0
14.2
0.0
0.0
51.5
IND
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
             MEAN        50.8        14.0     17.8     0.8
                                    115

-------
TABLE 44.   SUMMARY OF HRISK, ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR 21 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS




IN SUBURB I FJBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SCHOOL
I- 1
I- 2
I- 3
I- If-
I- 5
I- 6
I- 7
I- 8
I- 9
I -10
l-ll
1-12
1-13
I-lU
1-15
1-16
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20
1-21
MEAN

HRISK
7.9
30.7
9.9
8.7
8.7
50. 4
5.6
9.7
5.6
30.7
7.9
10.1
19.2
7.9
36.6
50.**
7.9
9.9
8.7
10.1
50.1
18.U

RACIAL
S7
53
97
97
99
100
100
97
93
95
100
100
99
99
99
99
99
90
99
99
9*
98.5

ECON
14.7
12.0
1C. 9
13.5
13.5
I'M
13.3
13.5
13.3
12.0
1U.7
14.1
12.3
14.7
12.7
12.9
14.7
16.9
13.5
1H.1
12.5
13-8
116
HWAY
23.2
26.3
0.0
18.7
15.7
0.0
35.3
0.0
64.6
16.9
18.3
53.7
10.5
9.S
69.4
72.5
16.7
O.-O
27. a
.22.6
60.7
27.2

IND
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
1
3.
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
1
0
.0
0.14


-------
TABLE 45.  SUMMARY OF HRISK, RACIAL, ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR SUBURBS III, V,





XIII AND EXURBAN AREA ELEMENTARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SCHOOL
III- 1
III- 2
V - 1
xrii-i '
TABLE 46.
SCHOOLS IN
HRISK
9-5
9.5
58.7
52.3
SUMMARY OF
SUBURB IV
RACIAL
99
99
100
99
ECON
13.3
13.3
13.9
15.7
HRISK, RACIAL, ECON,
PUBLIC SCHOOL
SYSYEM
HWAY
33.7
39.2
5.7
2.7
HWAY AND

IMD
0
0
0
0
IBD FOR 5" ELEMENTARY


SCHOOL
IV- 1
IV- 2
IV- 3
iv- h
IV- 5
HRISK
3^.0
23.0
1*8.6
3^.0
5L.U
RACIAL
99
99
99
100
15
ECON
12.0
13.2
11.9
12.0
11.9
HWAY
28.lt
22.1
1*6.7
17.7
25.1
IND
0
0
0
0
0
MEAN
38.2
12.2
28.0
                                  117

-------
TABLE 47.  SUMMARY OF HRISK, RACIAL,  ECON,  HWAY AND IND  FOR 6 ELEMENTARY




SCHOOLS IN SUBURB VI PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SCHOOL
VI- 1
VI- 2
VI- 3
VI- k
VI- -5

MEAN
HRT.SK
23.5
23.5
52.5
42.5
52.5
23.5
36.3
RACIAL
100
100
97
100
74
95
94.3
ECON
11.9
11.9
12.3
12.4
12.3
11.9
12.1
HWAY
23.8
15.2
0.0
26.1
67.5
38.7
28.6
IND
0
0
0
0 »
3
2
0.8 .
                                     118

-------
TABLE 48.  SUMMARY OF HRISK, RACIAL, ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR H ELEMENTARY




SCHOOLS IN SUBURB VII 'PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SCHOOL
VII- 1
VII- 2
VII- 3
VII- k
VII- 5
VII- 6.
t
VII- 7
VII- 8
VII- 9
VII -10
vii-n
MI-: AN
HRISK
73.4
66.4
73.4
37.3
17.7
37.3

31.3
37.5
31.3
66.4
66.4
48.9
RACIAL
100
100
99
99
96
100

100
97
83
99
100
97.5
ECON
13.8
11.3
13.8
14.0
13.7
14.0

12.3
11.7
12.3
11.2 •
11.2
12. 7
HWAY
12.5
0.0
10.7
21.8
26.6
8.0

17.7
0.0
95.0
28.6
53. -1
24.9
IND
0
1
0
o -
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0.1
                                     119

-------
TABLE 49.  SUMMARY OF HRISK,  RACIAL,  ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR 11 ELEMENTARY





SCHOOLS IN SUBURB VIII PUBLIC SCHOOL  SYSTEM

SCHOOL
VIII- 1
VIII- 2
VIII- 3
VIII- h
VIII- 5
VIII- 6
VIII- 7
vili- 8
vin- 9
VIII-10
VIII -11
KRISK
89.4
47.0
84.7
77.4
99.0
97.6
91.9
77.4
91.6
84.7
94.0
RACIAL
99
98
99
99
98
99
99
99
98
100
99
ECON
12.1
17.1
14.4
17.0
12.9
8.7
11.7
17.0
11.3
14.4
22.7
HWAY
66.3
26.9
66.8
69.6
36.2
0.0
43.6
33.3
41.1
64.3
94.7
IND
2
0
0
0
2
1
4
0
1
1
1
    MEAN.    ,        85.0    98.3        14.4     49.3    1.1
                                    120

-------
TABLE  50. SUMMARY OF HRISK, RACIAL, ECON, HWAY AND IND FOR 11 ELEMENTARY





SCHOOLS IN SUBURB IX PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SCHOOL
IX- 1
IX- 2
ix- 3
IX- h
ix- 5
. IX- 6
ix- 7
IX- 8
ix- 9
IX-10
ix-n
HRISK
73.0
95.8
92.9
94.4
40.1
97.1
65.7
98.0
75.7
81.5
92.1
RACIAL
88
37
78
37
95
89
48
81
83
87
87
ECON
16.2
12.5
16.3
15.5
2.2
24.3
17.2
19.1
13.9
15.8
17.5
HWAY
0.0
160.3
13.3
14.9
0.0
21.7
30.9
33.7
72.4
86. B
85.9
IND
0
1
0
J.
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
       MliAN      82.4        73.6      .15.5      47.26     -04
                                      121

-------
TABLE 51.   FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSING RISK PLOTTED AGAINST THE %





OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 + MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE IN ONLY THOSE




CHILDREN WHO HAD LIVED 80 - 100$ LIFE SPAN AT THE SAME RESIDENCE.  A TOTAL




OF 239 SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PAROCHIAL, AND SUBURBAN SCHOOL SYSTEMS ARE




INCLUDED IS THIS TABLE

Range $ of
8.0+mgPb
0
1 - Ik
15 - 29
30 - kk
U5 - 67
TOTAL
1ABEE 52.
Range of
3-19
1
11
9 "
0
i
22
*
Percent of
20 - 39
10
8
5
1
- 0
2U
Housing Units Constructed Before
ho - 59 60 - 79 80 - 100$
5 8 h2
17 15 35
5 7 38
0 3 12
015
27 3U 132
1950
Total
66
86
6k
16
7
239
PERCENT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTED!! 0? THS HOUSING RISK
.
.tenge % of
8.0+mgPb
0
1- oA
15- 29
30 - l&
1*5 - 6T
TOTAL .

Range of
3-19
O.i*
1*.6
3.8
0.0
o.U
9-2

Percent of
20 - 39
U.I
3.3
2.1
. - -OA
o.o
10.0

Housing Units Constructed Before 1950
• A'
Uo - 59 6b - 79 80 - 100
2.1 3.3 17.6
7.1 6.3 lU,6
2.1 2.9 l6.0
0.0 1.3 5.0
O.O O.k 2.1
11.3 1^.2 55-2
122
Total 
-------
TABLE  53.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE % OCCURRENCE OF TOOTH LEAD OF 8.0
OR MORE MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TISSUE AND THE VEHICLE TRAFFIC OF 223
SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC, PAROCHIAL, AND SUBURBAN SCHOOL SYSTEMS.
THE CHILDREN INCLUDED IN THE TABLE WERE ONLY THOSE WHO HAD LIVED 80 TO 100$
OF THEIR LIFE IN THE SAME RESIDENCE WHERE LIVING WHEN THE TOOTH WAS SHED.
THE "0" COLUMN REPRESENTS SCHOOL TRAFFIC AREA WHICH DID NOT CONTAIN AN INTER-
SECTION IN THE LIST OF 1,050 HIGHEST TRAFFIC INTERSECTIONS IN CUYAHOGA
COUNTY

, 8.0 + rag Pb

0
1 - 1*4
15 - 29
30 - kk
k
-------
TABLE 54.  PERCENT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF TABLE 53 ON PERCENT OCCURRENCE



OF TOOTH LEAD OF 8.0 OR MORE MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TISSUE AND VEHICLE




TRAFFIC OF 223 SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC, PAROCHIAL AND SUBURBAN




SCHOOL SYSTEMS

% 8.0 + mg Pb
0
o u.o
1 - Ik 8.5
15 - 29 5-8
30 - kk 1.3-
^5+ 1.3
Number of Vehicles in Thousands
1 - 3k
7.6
12.6
9.k
1.8
O.U
35 - 69 70 - 99
6.7 2.2
11.2 3-1
8.5 U.5
2.2 0,9
O.k 0.0
"100 - 139
1.8
1.8
0.0
0.9
O.k
11*0+
0.9
O.k
0.9
0.0
0.0
Total
23.2
37.6
29.1
7.1
2.5
TOTAL %        20.9      31.8      29.0      10.7        k.9       2.2   99.5
                                     124

-------
TABLE 55.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF % OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 + MG PB/100 GRAMS




OF TOOTH TISSUE AND MEAN INCOME FOR 238 SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC,




PAROCHIAL, AND SUBURBAN SCHOOL SYSTEMS.  ONLY CHILDREN WHO HAD LIVED 80 TO




100$ OF THEIR LIFE AT RESIDENCE WHERE LIVING WHEN TOOTH WAS SHED WERE IN-




CLUDED IN THIS TABLE

$ 8.0 +• mgPb Mean Annual Income for
2.2 - 6.5
0 8
1 - lU 3
15 - 2°, - 1
30-1*1* 3
1*5+ 0
Total 15
6.6 - 10.9
37
3l*
33
8
6
118
TABLE 56. PERCENT FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF
School in
11.0 - .1*
17
2k
1*1
1+
1
87
Thousands .
.9 15. U +
5
6
6
1
0
18

Total i
67
67
81
16
7
238
THE ABOVE TABLE

<$, 8.0 + mgPb Mean Annual
2.2 - 6.5
0 3.U
1 - 1U 1.3
15 - 29 0.1*
30 - I*** 1.3
1*5+ 0.0
Total g 6.U
Income for
6.6 - 10.9
15-5
ll*.3
13.9
3'.U
2.5
1*9.6
School in
11.0 - lU
'7-1
10.1
17.2
1.7
o.U
36.5
Thousands
•9 15. U +
2.1
2.5
2.5
O.I*
0.0
7.5

Total <&
28.1
28.2
3**-0
6.8
2.9
100.0
                                    125

-------
TABLE   57. PEARSON COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION FOR % OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 OR




MORE MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE, HOUSING RISK (HRSIK), RACIAL



(io VIHITE), MEAN INCOME (ECON), VEHICLE TRAFFIC (HWAY), AND INDUSTRY (IND)



SCORES OF CLEVELAND PUBLIC, CLEVELAND PAROCHIAL, AND SUBURBAN SCHOOLS

Number
Schools
8.0 + $ LEAD
Cleveland 126
Parochial h6
Suburbs 6?
HRISK
Cleveland 126
Parochial U6
Suburbs 67
RACIAL
Cleveland 126
Parochial k6
Suburbs 67
HRISK RACIAL
.0569 - .011*0
s = .263 s = .1*1*9
- .01*71
s = .-378 -
.0712 - .0628
S = .28U S = .307

- .0651
S = .275
-
- .3183
s = .ooi*
- .0651
S = .275
-
- .3183
S = .00*1
ECON
.0637
S = .21+0
.1793
S = .117
- .0530
S = .335

- .3806
S = .001
- .8220
S = .001
.1301*
S = .11+6
.3392
S = .001
-
- .1053
S = .198
HWAY
.0876
s = .165
- .11+86
S = .162
.12ll8
S = .157

.0200
S = Al2
.UlUl
S'= .002
.27^3
S = .012
*f
• 1370
S « .103
-
- .2728
S = .013
IND
.1AS7
S = .OU8
- .1070
S = .2UO
.0079
S = A75

.2107
S = .009
.5301
S - .001
.3079
s = .006
- .1521
s = .080

- .0860
S = .2^5
                                      126

-------
TABLE 57. (CONTINUED)
Number
Schools
ECON
Cleveland 126
Parochial U6
Suburbs
HWAY
Cleveland 126
Parochial U6
Suburbs 67
IMP
Cleveland 126
Parochial U6
Suburbs 67
HRISK

- .3806
.001
- .8220
S a .001
.130U
S a .li|6

.0200
S « .412
S a .002
v2743 "
S = . 012

,2107
S » .009
.5301
S » .001
.3079
SB .006
RACIAL

.3392
S a .001
-
- .1053
S a .198

.1370
S = .103
_
--.2728
S = -013

- .1521
S a .080
-
.0860
S a .2^5
ECON

-
-


.1366
S = .002
-.0239
S = .424

S a .001
- .5309
S a .001
- .2692
s = .oiU
HWAY

.1366
S = .061*
S a .002
- .0239
S a .U2U

-
-
-
-
.13*15
S » .067
' .3605
S = .007
,2150
s =AoUo
IMD

S a ,001
- .5309
S = .001
- .2692
s = .oil*

.13^5
s » .067
.3605
S a .007
.2150
s = .oUo

-
—
-
       127

-------
TABLE 58.  SPEARMAN CORRELATIONS FOR % OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 OR MORE MG LEAD PER


100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE, HOUSING RISK (HRISK), $ WHITE (RACIAL), MEAN IN-

COME (ECON), VEHICLE TRAFFIC (HWAY), AND INDUSTRY (IND) SCORES OF  CLEVELAND,

PAROCHIAL, AND  SUBURBAN SCHOOLS

Number
Schools r- HRISK RACIAL ECON
HWAY IND
 8.0 + # LEAD

 Clevelauid 126        .0336    .OVf3*       -0931        .1220       .0^-77
                   S « .355      .332     S a ,151     S »  .087    S « .298

 Parochial  W>  ' • '.  - .3.662      ~           .2^20      - .0751     ~ .0572
                   S a .135              S = .053     S «  .310    S « .353

'Suburbs    67        .0021   - .0938      - .0105        .1088       .0829
               - . !S « .493      .225     S * .U66     S ^  .190    S = .252

 HRISK

 Cleveland 126        -       - .2598*     - .517^      - .1198       -36^9
                             s =  .008     s «  .001     s «  .091   s » .001
 Parochial  1|6                               .8606        .36lU      .6916
                                         ,S => .001     S a ,007   S = .001

 Suburbs    67        -       -  .2205      --.0077        .1955      .2909
                             S =  .037     S « .^75    . S « .056   S a .008

 RACIAL

^Cleveland :.07      - .2598      -           .^52*       ,1265*   - .1931
                   S--^ .008      -        s « ..001                S « .037

 Parochial  U6        -          -           -            -
 Suburbs  '  67      -  .2205      -         - .1551      -  -lOCA-    - .0518
                   S a .037      -       S =  .105     S » .209   S » .338
                                     128

-------
                     TABLE 58 '(CONTINUED)
Number
Schools *•
ECON
Cleveland 126
Parochial H6
Suburbs 67
HWAY
Cleveland 126
t
Parochial U6
Suburbs 6?
IMP
Cleveland 126
Parochial U6
Suburbs 67
HRISK -

- -517U
S = .001
- .8606
S = .001
- .0077
s = M5

- .1198
s » .091
- .36iU
S = .007
.1955
s = .056

• 3649
S a .QOl
.6916
S = .001
.2909
S = .008
RACIAL

.1*1+52*
S » .001
-
- .1551
S =.105

.1265*
S a .122
_
- .100U
s = 209

- -1931
S » -037
_
- .0518
S = .338
ECON

—
-
_•

.17^1
S « .026
- .M4-93
s = .001
- .080
S a .260

-•4317
S = -001
- .6580
S = .001 -
- .2837
S = .010
HWAY

,1741
S = .026
- .M+93
S « .001
- .0800
s ~ .260

-
-
-

.16^5
S = .033
.3689
s =•. . 006
.1807
s = .072
IKD
•
- .^317
S » .001
- .6580
S » .001
- -2837j
S = .010

.16)45
S = .033
.3689
S » .006
.1807
S « .072

-
-
-
*  The asterisk indicates coefficients of correlation on only 87
   Cleveland public schools instead of 126 schools used for other
   coefficients for the Cleveland public school^system,
                              129

-------
TABLE 59.  PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 MG OR MORE OF TOOTH LEAD PER 100G





TOOTH TISSUE IN RELATION TO HRISK, RACIAL, ECON, HWAY, IND FOR THE




CLEVELAND PUBLIC AND PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS.  THE COLUMN "NO" REPRESENTS THE




NUMBER OF CHILDREN WHOSE TEETH WERE ANALYZED FOR LEAD.  THE COLUMN "8.0 MG"




REPRESENTS THE PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF TEETH CONTAINING 8.0 OR MORE MG PB/100G




OF TOOTH. TISSUE.  SCHOOLS ARE ARRANGED ACCORDING TO AIR COLLECTING STATIONS

SCHOOL
Air Station 1
X- 8
X- 75
x-116,
xi- b$
Air Station 2
X- 1
X- -2
x- 3
X- 17
x- 59
X- 71
x- 92
X- 93
x-133
xi- 19
XI- 25
NO.

28
8
U8
12

-
29
U9
21
35
h6
12
70
12
2
6
5J8.Orr.g-t- HRISK

3:6
12.5
1U.6
25.0

-
10,3
28.6
1U.3
1H.3
13-0
0
22.9
16.7
0
16.7

85
3
99
96

89
89
89
97
76
94
96
92
99
89
99
RACIAL

0
0
64
-

45
59
4
1
3
0
1
0
66
-
_
ECON

4.2
8.3
7.5
10.2

10.9
10.9
10.9
9.4
16.9
8.9
10.4 .
8.6
6.6
9.8
10.1
HWAY

0.0
0.0
59.7
3.8

116.0
134.5
117.0
39.1
120.4
53.9
61.7
100.8
53.9
98.6
54.2
IND

2
1
7
3

6
1
6
2
1
1
0
0
2
2
6
                                     130

-------
TABLE 59 (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
XI- 30
XI- 37
Air1 Station 3
X- 35
x- ia
X- 86
X-108
XT- 16
Mr Station 4
x- 16
X- 2*f
X- 32
X- 52
x- 6U
X- 68
X- 82
X- 9^
X-103
X-120
X-12U
XI- 13
wo...
7
21

..96
22
30
6U
9

55
9
25
21
-
28
UU
20
-
35
1*0
16
.tfoB.OiTlK
1U.3
0

1U.6
-18.2
16.7
•
20.3
UH.H

9*1
0
32.0
0
-
10.7
18.2
10.0
-
5.7
27-5
6.3
HRISK
89
89

82
84
84
100
100

99
89
98
100
89
97
97
99
100
98
97
99
RACIAL
-
-

97
91
98
87
-

0
0
0
1
0
0
1
72
0
0
0
—
ECON
10.4
10.9

9.4
10.3
11.1
9.4
9.4

7.3
5*. 4
5.3.
6.6
5.4
6.6
6.6
9.5
6.5
5.1
6.3
7.2
HWAY
72.1
133.1

29,0
82.7
100. a
0.0
0.0

35.5
57.7
0.0
:0.0
. 0.0
0.0
0.0
76.6
17.3
0.0
17.3
17.3
IND
0
1 '

1
1
1
2
2

4
3
12
6
1
2
5
3
3
5
6
3
       131

-------
                       TAKLE 59 (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
NO.
i.Qmg+    HRISK   RACIAL
ECON
HWAY
Air Station 5
x^ lf8
x- 58
'x- 87
X- 91
X-117
X-13U
XI- 27
•
XI- 28
XI- U2
Air Station 6
X- 1+0
x- 1+5
x- 61
x- 85
X-129
XI- 21
XI- 22
XI- 23
XT- 29
•_
•to
51
-
3*
U2
52
13

10
lU .

97
U2
^3
30
57
9
18
16
7

0
5.9
*
27^8
7.1
17.3
0
»
0
a
7.1

15.5
2.1+
.18.6
20.0
2U.6
11.1
5.6
18.8
lly.3

98
98
99
97
99
99
100

94
98

98
72
91
77
95
92
97
95
98

99
100
29
99
92
4
• —

—
•>.-,

4
76
30
90
94
-
—
-
_

9,4
9.8
9.4
9.3
9.4
8.6
• 8.9

8.7
9.8
• -
9.5
10.3
10.2
10.3
10.5
10.2
10.3
10.5
9.5

0.0
#1.2
118.4
40.3
47.3
20.7
32.7

20.7
147.4
-
57.0
16.0
38.0
55.3
20.6
44.2
67.1
20.6
57.1

1
3
5
2
3
7
4

7
8

6
4
•
3
7
0
6
4
4
                               132

-------
TABLE 59 (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL
Air Station 7
X- H7
x- 56
x- 72 ,
X- 73
x- 78
X-125
X-127

xi- ih
XI- 3^
xi- 38
Air Station 8
X- 3^
X- 8l
xi- h
XT- 15
Air Station 9
X- 11
x- 13
x- 25
X-114
X-132
x-135
XI- 31
NO.' «

15
86
58
62
^3
56
-

30
U9
11

31
31
58
23

59
36
i*2
50
29
17
10
fcS.Omg-t-

33.3
26.7
6.9
19. u
9.3
1U.3
-

13.3
•lU.3
9.1

25.8
22.6
17.2
8.7

16.9
11.1
11.9
10.0
13.8
5.9
10.0
HRISK

85
99
90
97
82
97
90

85
•98
96

83
71
97
86

100
97
63
99
99
99
96
RACIAL

94
99
94
96
96
85
96

-
-
-

98
99
-
-

0
91
0
96
91
1
—
ECON

10.6
11.0
10.3
9.3
12.1
9.3
10.3
»
10.6
7.8
9.5

. 10.7
12.6
10.9
10.1

-
9.3
5.3
6.0
9.2
10.1
9.9
HWAY

123.0
93.2
173.9
107.9
160.0
66.7
69.3

89.1
55.1
102.9

88.6
24.8
58, a
18.9

22.6
64.4
22.6
0.0
13.4
0.0
0.0
IND

3
1
2
6
1
4
1

1
1
5

3
1
1
1

2
3
3
4
5
2
3
         133

-------
                       TABLE  59 (CONTINUED)






SCHOOL	NO.  <0.0mK+   HRISK      RACIAL      ECON     HWAY     INP
Air Station 10
X- 21
X- 39
X- U2
•x- 63
x- 67
x-ni
xi- Ui
Air Station 12
x- 50
X-118
Air Station 13
X- 5
Xi'- 18
XT- ho
Air Station 14
X- 7
X- lU
X- ^3
X- 55
x- 90
XI- 2
XI- 2o

22
19
23
51
27
13
11

53
36
•
H5
25
6

2k
ho
22
-
39
5
lU

31.8
5.3
M
17.6
ll.l
15.U
18.2

11.3
13.9
»
11.1
0
0

20.8
0
18.2
-
23.1
0
0

98
98
100
100
99
98
100

54
54

90
100
100

98
45
79
65
68
98
65

74 10.0
1 -5.1
42 ^ 10.1
58 9.6
1 5.9
49 9.0
10.1

98 12.9
99 12.9

100 10.8
9.8
9.9

0 12.6
1 11.1
1 11.1
0 13.8
1 10.3
8.3
13.8

0.0
66.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

52.6
0.0

0.0
34.1
31.3

13.5
26.8
-. 13,5
26.5
13,6
35.2
13.5

16
15
8
7
12
14
8

0
0

1
2
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                               134

-------
SCHOOL
          TABLE 59 (CONTINUED)



NO.   %8.0 mg+  HRISK     RACIAL    ECON
HWAY
IND
Air Station
X-19
X-62
X-70
X-97
X-100
X-109
X-121
X-130
XI-1
XI-9
XI-36
XI-39
Air Station
X-9
X-76
XI-8
15
58
17
48
76
36
19
73
9
24
12
3
11
16
94
59
27

14.0
29.4
4.2
14.5
13.9
5.3
19.2
0
20.8
8.3
0
0

16.0
8.5
14.8

97
22
98
99
98
98
98
98
73
98
94
96

98
82
82

86
47
70
81
63
54
78
35
-
-
-
-

99
97
_

9.1
4.6
7.8
9.0
8.2
7.6
7.6
7.8
12.9
10.0
5.2
9.5

10.2
11.1
11.1

51.0
133.4
81.1
18.9
81.4
51.0
40.6
162.7
13.8
-
93.6
92.4

58.0
39.7
62.9

3
14
10
6
4
4
5
13
1
7
15
5

1
1
1
                               135

-------
                      TABLE 59  (CONTINUED)
SCHOOL     NO.  l/08.0rr.g+  HRISK
RACIAL
ECON
HWAY    IND
Lr Station 17
X- 26 •
x- 29
X- 33
X- 37 .
X- 69
X- 77
X- S3
X* 88
x- 98
X-107
x-no
X-112
tir Station
X- 4
X- 22
X- 30
X-101
30
17
21
16
28
14
-
38
42
12
24
22
18
49
86
25
38
10.0
5.9
4.8
31-3
14.3
7.1
-
' 7.9
9.5
25-0
16.7
22.7

6.1
4.7
36.0
7.9
94
97
94
99
100
97
99
98
98
99
100
94

93
97
97
98
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
6
0

0
0
1
0
9.4
7.2
7.6
7.9
8.2
7.2
6.9
9.1
9.8
6.9
9.6
9.4

9.1
9.5
9.5
9.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

71.9
77.7
30.5
6.4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
0

1
1
0
3
                                136

-------
                          TABLE 59 (CONTINUED)
   SCHOOL    NO.
*.0rag   HRISK
RACIAL
ECON
HWAY
IND
r Station
X-128
X-131
xr- 35
19
1*8
39
1

16.7
17.9
0

68
73
98

98
100
-

10.6
12.9
10.0

17.2
13.8
19.4

3
1
5
Air Station 20



   X- 95       33



  xi- 17       26
3-1
11.5
72
79
94
12.1
11.1
68.0
86.2
2
2
                                    137

-------
TABLE  60   PEARSON COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION OF % OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 MG

LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE; AND SCORES FOR ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE

(FT), LEAD (PB),  CADMIUM (CD), ANTIMONY (SB), AND so2 OF CLEVELAND PUBLIC

AND PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS
              8.0+mgPb  particulate Air Pb    Air Cd     Air Sb   Air SOp
j 8.0 nig Pb

Cleveland

        •

Parochial



PARTICULATE .

Cleveland



Parochial



MR LEAD

Cleveland



Parochial



AIR CADMIUM

Cleveland



Parochial
 - .0520
  N = 88
S = -315

 - .0119
  N = 27
   .1264
  N = 70
   .1017
  N = 21
S = .331
 -  .0102
  N a 70
S a .U66

    .2012
  N = 21
S a .191
             - .0520    .1261+    -.0102
              N « 88   N » 70    N = 70
            s = .315 s = .11+9  s = .1+66
             - .0119    -1017     -2012
              N = 27   N a 21    N = 21
            S a .^77 S = .331  S = .191
            .1635   - .1821
           N a 70    N = 70
         S = .088  S - .066

          - .2707   - -1305
           N = 21    N » 21
         S a .118  S a .286
   .1635
  N = 70
S = .088

 - .2707
  N a 21
S a .118
 - .1821  - .1016
  N = 70   N a 70
S a .066 S = .201


 - .1305    .1985
  N = 21   N a 21
S = .286 S = .19k

         138
" -  .1016
  N = 70"
S - .201

    .1985
  N = 21
S = .
                                N = 6k    N « 70
                              S = .357  S = .389
                                          -,0537
                                N = 22    N = 25
                              S « .193  S = .399
            -  .0850      .7171*
             N = 6U     N » 70
           S « .252   S = .001
             N = 22     N « 25
           S a .117   S a .001
 - .2525      .1063
  N = 60    N =  58
S - .026  S a ,21*»-
 • 111
 - ,3856   -  .5007
  N-a 20    N =  20
S - ,OU7  S = .012
                       - .2288
             N a  60    N a 58
            S = .001  S = .
               .027^   - .^331
              N = 20    N = 20
            S  = .U5U  S a .028

-------
                           TABLE  60 * COOTIMJED )


             8.0+mgPb  particulate  Air Pb    Air Cd    Air Sb    Air SOp
MR ANTIMONY
Cleveland     - .OU69    - .0850     -  .2525     -^571     -          .0856
               N a 6k  '   N = 6k     N a 60    N a 60     -        N ~  53
             S a .357   S a ,252    S » .026  S  a .001     -      S a . 2?1
Parochial       .19UU      .26Ul     - .3856     ,027't      -          .^732
               N = 22     N = 22      H a 20    N =  20      -        N =  21
             S.= .193   S = .117    S = .0^7  S = .U5U      -      S » .015

AIR SOp

Cleveland     - .03^2      .717^       .1063   - .2288      .0856
               N = 70     N = 70      N = 58    N a  58     N «  53
             s = .389   s = .001    s a .21^  s = .ote   s  « .271
Parochial     - ,0537      -7^^     - .5007   - .^331     ^732
               N = 25     N = 25      N = 20    N = 20    N = 21
             s » .399   s » .001    s = .012  s = .028  s = .015
                                   139

-------
TABLE 61   SPEARMAN CORRELATIONS OF THE % OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 + MG LEAD PER

100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE; AND SCORES FOR ATMOSPHERIC  PARTICULATE (PS),

LEAD (PB),  CADMIUM (CD), ANTIMONY (SB), AND SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02) OF

CLEVELAND PUBLIC AND  PARCHIAL SCHOOLS
 8.0 +  Pb
 IN TEETH

 Cleveland
 Parochial
 PARTICULATE
 Cleveland
 Parochial
 AIR LEAD
 Cleveland
 Parochial
 AIR CADMIUM
 Cleveland
 Parochial
Particulate  Air Pb
   -  .1036
   N  = 88     N =  70
  S « .168   S = .359

      .0196      -0900
   N  a 27     N =  21
  S = .U6l   S
                .0985
               N = 70
             S a .209

              - .3089
               N = 21
             S = -087
      ,0985
    N  = 70
   S = .209

    - ..3089
    N  a 21
   S - .087
    - .1960   -  -OU2U
     N = 70    N = 70
   s » .052  s = .361+

    - .0382      -0^95
     N = 21    N a 21
   S a .^35  S = Jil6
  Air Cd     Air Sb    Air SOP
 - ,0078
  N = 70
s = .
             - .0313    - -0575
              N =» 63     N = 70
            s = .koh   s = .318
   .1030       .l&>3    - -0775
  N =» 21      N = 22     N » 25
S = .328    S = .235   S = .356
 - .I960       .1006       .7229
  N a 70      N = 63     N a 70
S a .052    S a .216   S = .001

 - .0382       .6381       .761+3
  N a 21      N = 22     N a 25
S = .H35    S a .001   S =. .001
             -  .5278       .0752
  N = 70      N =  59      N = 58
S a ,.36U    S = .001    S a .287
    .0^95
  N rf 21
S - .
                                                         N a 20     N = 20
                                                       S a .002   S » .262
                .7693    - .2667
               N = 59     N a 58
             S  = .001   S a .022
                .2^75    -
               N = 20     N = 20
             S a ,lU6   S a .035
                                   140

-------
                           TABLE  61 (CONTINUED)


_ ^articulate _ Air pb     Air Cd   •   Air Sb     Air SQg
      i
AIR ANTIMONY

Cleveland         .1006        - .5278      .7&93       -          .00^1
                 N = 63         N = 59     N = 59       -         N = 52
               S = .216       S a ,001   S a .001       -       S =..
Parochial         .76^3         -.1517    - .taM       .3123
                 N a 25         N = 20     N = 20      N « 21
               S a .001       S a .262   S a . 035    S = ,08U
Parochial         .'6381        - .6l5U      .2^75       -          .3123
                 N = 22         N = 20     N = 20       ~         N » 21
               S = .001       S « .002   S « .ll|6       -       S a
AIR SOo

Cleveland         .7.229          .0752    - .2667
                 N = 70         N = 58     N « 58      N = 52
               S « .001       S = .287   S = .022    S a .Ii8s
                                    141

-------
§
8
CO
1
o
a c

s
§
I
I
£H
r^i
O
a
8
8
CO

P-i
3
M
ITN
CM 1
H

&

a
@
ttJ
5
o
|
I

t3
M
c3
1

CNJ

pj
i— 3
pQ
^n
^

:5
aS~l
r1
ro
O
o g
sj <

a ^
D CO
55
t"j
§ 3
O H
3 H
a
'•^n t^
H S
V . j "J
D O
0
a
L> H
3 2
§
D t-i
^ ' CO*
^ s
^-) P]
t "]
3 o
Q
^Q

^ ^
l| CM
iq M
S H
i fl
P3 tH
g *<
i~) CJ
r s
§ 1
CO
O PH
H C^ p^
EH i — 1 ^5
co -~-^ n FQ W
CO PH B



















































M
i-i
0
0
O
W
^i
W
O
O
0
CO
«H
o
c
o
•n
•p
(0
^
CtJ

W
>-i
OJ
JS
CJ
CO
O


















r-i 0
•H ^
Pi 0
^ °
ft CO

d O
O M
•H O
« '0
>>CQ
§g
•H O
•P 0
O CO


tiO
d
•rj 0
rH V f
h O
eu o
Q) CO


o
-P CU
CD tu
O o
'H CJ
t3 CO
<1>


^
<1J C

w
ci) r^
CO &0
c
O 'C)
S H
•H
JS
O
H
O
o
A !
C'
10




CO O 0« t— CO CO C^1 t~j »H tH WHvooo\o H

ON co tA H tnco t- e- b- •* ^t ,-( ITiVO H ITNJ- OOONVO
CM CM H r-i H H
** ,


OcOVOVDOC-CUONCVJlTvO
OHHOCOOHOHCMO



VO OOCM CU HCO CTvO.O
t*« c^ * *,* * *, * * * *
• * CO £"*• ^^ ^™ r™( VO OO \O ' ^5
CM H H H H CM

t
oooooi^cnooc-cncvio
H cncoi5-**Jlt^H~'H

^- g CM irvt-.o-iPOvococovQ
\J \ ^** t y t v OA % v ** A ^J ^Vi *3^ *w^


-

C7\ -3" r-J CM OCMO\DC3\OH
HCMcn^f,4-irNi^vo l>-r>-
1 1 1 1 1*1 1 1 1 1 1
r^ PS PS PS ?S PS* PS p^ p^ p^ PS*



142

-------










_
1
a
o
o


s
E
1





















M
.H
O
O
.C
O
CO
J^
M
0^
o
f
o

M
C
•rl

1

Pi C

d CJ
o n
•H O
W 'O
>>CO
O fc
•H O
•P O
O W
(§
bO
C
•H !

CM O\ CO O ^ CO CM
CM H 00 C\T H W ^*

»d- c\ o oo ca, o co
VO CO O CO VO VO VO
H • H
w • ' '

1 t
H (A co o -d- m ^r
ON CO CO C~- t~- CJN CO
rH rn





VO H H OO ON CO ON
O OO CM CM O CM CM
vo in o- m t— • ON vo
vo" CO O CO in CO vO
H

-=J- VO ON CO ON O CM
ON CM C~- t>- CM O ON
H CM CM CM H H
CM H CO VO O O CO
vo oo oo oo c>- in f-


OO H CO H 00 ,* H
t-- CO CO ON ON H CM
' rn rH
II 1 1 i 1 I
XX X X X X X

<& C H CQ
H xr C\. H

O- VO .* ON
00 CM t- UN

H ON CO 00
VO t- t- CM
«H
•


CM »* CM OO
J- ITv CM OO
H rH i-«





VO CM C- VO
H O ^- H
in oo VD ov
in t~- ^j- \o
r-t-

in c- vo
t>- 1 VO ^f
CM H CM
O CO f-
J- i -C in


-^ t~ co ON
CM CM CM CM
H H H H
III!
X X X X

t"— w^ t—
H t— CO
OO CM H

O t- 00
CM CM CM

ITV t~ ITx
oo jf CN



CO O VO
* * ft •
^ CO H
H





co ^3- in
o o o
t~- ^r «n
-a- co t-


ON co o">
C^- oo c~
r-1 r->. rH
C » ON CM
oo CM m


H CM ^f
oo oo o^>
H H H
11 1
XXX
143

-------
ro
UD


rH
X
•o
c
CJ
w +
_f~j *H
PL, f3
X
o
ra c
d i--*t
0
•H
•4-*
o +•
e -M
W -H
m
H
X
fcO C
C n
C
IXJ -t-
O 4->
^J -H
H
C
C cf
ro
0
O) O

f^
0 O
o c
o
O T
E -H
^ G
o
O O lf~i C-t
CN CO .T i.T

•-I J- CT' rH
CM zt CM rH
CM CC CO O
^ ID C O
^" O co C^
10 10 r^ CM
J.t O -H
*• f
^- cn r^ co
in r- co cr>
rH

r~ co co o
m r- o ex
co cr c —
in co in co
ID CO CM CO
O O -H rH
•~\ 10 co in
co ID cr; co
in in co cn
co cn co in
co cn o
rH

<*"> H O CC
-3- ITN ,rr rH
rH VD O rH
r-T r-T
in 10 t~- co
cr> ^- 1 m
o n CM

r~ c< o
co cn in
CM rH rH
in o co
CO cn cn
CC O O
cn c m
cn co CO
co r- co
o c o
rH rH ^H

CM co m
CD t- CM
r*1* to IP
m r~ co
o 10 t^
rH rH rH
rH m in
rH -H ^H
CO -H CO
CO CO CO
(~~ d C<
co r- r^

l>- CO H
LTN rH NO
O CN CO
r-T
O O -H
.-I —\
O
ro

CJ
CM
rH
0
CO
CM
in
co
CO

CO
o
0
rH
CO
tn
to
in

OJ
ON

CN
                                                                                co
                                                                                m
                                                                                UD
                                                                                CM
                                                                                 «
                                                                                cn
                                                                                O
                                                                                m
                                                                                cn
                                                                                 *»
                                                                                in
                                                                                o
                                                                                •H.
                                                                                CM
                                                                                in
                                                                                CO

                                                                                rH
                                                                                 »

                                                                                rH









                                                                                CO
                                                                                O'P
                                                                                rH
                                                                                CO
                                                                                CNS
                                                                                in
                                                                               'o


                                                                                vcT
                                                 144

-------
 TABLE 64   PEARSON COEFFICIENTS  OF CORRELATION OF THE PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF

 8.0 + MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE;  SCHOOL SCORES FOR PRE 1950

 HOUSING (HRISK),  % WHITE  (RACIAL),  MEAN INCOME  (ECON), AND INDUSTRY (IND)

 SCORES; AND TEACHER EVALUATIONS  FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND

 PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
 	8.0+mgPb     HRISK     RACIAL     ECOW	HWAY	I HP

                - .313^     -  .2008   -  .0621      .1623      .1^55     -.2^97
 ',' Left Handed    N = 25      N = 25    N = 19    N «  25     N » 25     N = 25
               s = .o6U    s = .168  s = ,1*00  s = .219   s  =  .;
                - .31*08     -  .2071      .01*82      .0003      .0166    - .0313
 ledication       N = 23      N = 23    N = 18    N «  23     N =  23     N = 23
               s = .056    s = .172  s = A25  s = .if99   s - .'470   s = .UW4

                - ,2300     -  .1799   -  .21487      .0733      .0285      .3119
 'hysical         N =* 25      N = 25    N = 19    N =  25     N a  25     N = 25
               s = .13^    s = .195  s = .152  s = .36^   s = .Mi6   s = .065
                '- .230^        .2UOU    -  .14-778    -  .1766     .1253      .2811+
Motional        N « 25      N = 25    N « 19    N =  25    N = 25     N = 25
               S = .1-3^    S « .12^  S =•- .019   S = .199  S  = .275   S = .086
                - .1615     -  .0322    -  .5556    -  .091*3   -  .1^37      .2737
Learning         N = 25      N = 25    N = 19    N =  25,   N =  25     N = 25
               S = .220    S = .U39  S a .007   S = .327  S « .2U7   S = ,093
                                      145

-------
TABLE  65   SPEARMANS CORRELATIONS OF THE PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF 8.0 + MG



LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE; SCHOOL SCORES FOR PRE 1950 HOUSING




(HRISK), % WHITE (RACIAL), MEAN INCOME (ECON),  AND INDUSTRY (IND)  SCORES;




AND TEACHER EVALUATIONS FOR 25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE CLEVELAND PUBLIC




SCHOOL SYSTEM

^ 8.0mgPb
Left - .
landed N
S =
_
fedication N
. S =
*"" •
'hysical N
S a
^ _
""* •
Smotional N
Q —
** •
Learning N
S =»
3132
= 25
,o6U
1*2^1-6
- 23
.022
155^
- 25
.229
1870
» 25
.185
1391
» 25
.25U
HRISK
- .0539
N a 25
S « .399
- .1721*
N = 23
S a .216
,1758
- N a 25
S - ,200
.31^6
N a 25
S = .063
.319^
N a 25
s = .060
RACIAL
- .1U29
N - 19
S a .280
.0021
N = 18
S a .U97
- A757
N a 19
S = .020
- .5697
N = 19
S a .005
- .6832
N a 19
S = .001
ECON
.22U5
N a 25
S a .lifO
- .01*61
N a 23
S a .1*17
.0073
N = 25
S a .1*86
- .1557
N ~ 25
s « .229
- .1*159
N » 25
S « .21*3
HV7AY
- -0354
N = 25
S - .1*33
.151*1
N = 23
S = .21*1
- .0930
N = 25
S a ,329
.1120
N = 25
S =. .297
- .096^
'N = 25
s = .326
IND
- -2763
N = 25
s = .091
.011*2
N a 23
S = ,1*7U
.3^53
N = 25
S = .01*5
.21*76
N'= 25
S « .116
.2323
N a 25
s = .132
                                    146

-------
TABLE 66   TEACHER EVALUATIONS  I IT 6  SCHOOLS COIITAINING LESS THAN 5°/0 WHITE





OR 95% BLACK CHILDREN AND  8  SCHOOLS  CONTAIIilrTG 96 TO 100$ WHITE CHILDREN.




THESE SCHOOLS WERE IN THE  CLEVELAND  PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

School
x-m
X- 32
X- 88
X- 93
K-12U
x- ho
MEAN:
Tooth Pb % Left
Racial %8.0+mgPb. handed'
4* "•
0%
0% .
0%
0%
4%
1.3%
17.3
32.0
7.9
22.9
27.5,
15.5
20.5
7.5
7.3
10.7
5.7
5.5
10.2
7.8
% Medi- Learning
cation Score
0.5
0.6
2.1
0.9
1.6
3.0
1.5
11.6
5.2
13.3
,7.4
14.2
16.2
11.3
Emotional Physical
Scbre S'core
9.6
9.1
10.0
6.8
6.1
13.5
9.2 .
2.3
2.2
3.8
1.4
.3.0
5.0
3.1

x- 9

X- 81
x- 91
X-131
x- 56
X- 73,
X-128
X-127
MEAN
99%
*
99% '
99%
100%
99%
96%
98%
96%
98.3%
16.0

22.6
27.8
17.9
26.7
19.4 .
16.7
_
21.4
2.7

8.5
8.5
4.7
16.8
6.6
14.6
7.3
8.7
0.0

3.1
2.3 .
0.3
0.9
0.6
4.7
0.2 f
1.6
7.3 *
•»
3.5
7.0
4.8
14.9
9.1
.12.2
5,4
8.0
5.9

•&9.
.8.3
3.5
w
6.4 " -
7.8
7:9
7.3
2.S

. 3-9
2.0
2.0
6.6
i
2.2
7.4
2.6
3.4
                                    147

-------
TABLE 67  PEARSON COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATION OF THE 5 SCORES  OF EVALUATIONS

 OF LEFT HANDED (% LEFT), USE OF MEDICATION (% MED)j AND THE PHYSICAL,

 EMOTIONAL, AND LEARNING SCORES OF SYMPTOMS OF LEAD POISONING  FOR 25

 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE  CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.   A  TOTAL OF

 6,1*80 CHILDREN WERE INCLUDED IN THE TEACHERS EVALUATIONS OF THE SYMPTOMS

 OF LEAD TOXICITY IN CHILDREN ATTENDING THESE 25 EIjEMENTARY SCHOOLS




 	•	Left Hand.  Medication    Physical -  Emotional  Learning

                                 .3592        .2>a8        .325^      .1390
 $ Left  Handed        -         N = 23       N a 25      N « 25    N =  25
                              S « .01*6     S = .122    S a .056  S » .25*4-
                    ".3592       -            .k33k        .1886      .2659
Medication         N « 23       -           N « 23      N » 23     N » 23
                  S = .OU6       -         s = ,019    S = .19*4   S = .110
                                                           .6211       .7521
 Physical           N * 25      N - 23        -          N = 25      N = 25
                  S = .122    S = .019        -        S = .001    S = .001
                      .1390       .2659        .7521        ,7^58
 Learning           N a  25      N = 23       N = 25      N = 25
                  S - .25^    S = .110     S = .001    S = .001
                     .325^       .1886        .6211
 Emotional          N = 25      N = 23       N = 25       -          N = 25
                  s = .056    s = .191*     s = .001       -        s - .001
                                      148

-------
TABLE 68   SPEARMAN CORRELATIONS OF THE FIVE SCORES OF EVALUATIONS OF LEFT
HANDED (% LEFT), USE OF MEDICATION (MED), AND THE PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, AND
LEARNING SCORES OF SYMPTOMS OF LEAD POISONING FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THE
CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.  A TOTAL OF 6,1*80 CHILDREN WERE INCLUDED IN
THE TEACHERS EVALUATIONS OF THE SYMPTOMS OF LEAD TOXICITY IN CHILDREN IN
THESE 25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS



% Left Handed


Medication


Physical


Emotional
*

Learning

% Left
Handed
„
~
-
-.3377
N = 23
s = .058
.1895
N = 25
s = .182
,3188
N = 25
s = .060
.221*8
N = 25
S = ,ll*0
Medication
.3377
N = 23
s = .058
_
-
-
• 3591
N = 23
S = .OU6
.21*10
N = 23
s = .131*
.3591*
N = 23
S = ,014-6
Physical
.1895
N = 25
S = .182
• 3591
N = 23
S = .01+6
_
-
-
.6223
N = 25
S = .001
.7517
H = 25
S = .001
Emotional
.3188
N = 25
s = .060
.21*10
N = 23
s = .131*
.6223
N = 25
S = .001
_
-
-
^7337
N = 25
S = .001
Learning
.221*8
N = 25
S = .11*0
-.359^
N = 23
S = .01*6
.7517
N = 25
S = .001
.7337
N = 25
S = .001
_
-
-
                                    149

-------
 TABLE 69.  PEARSON COEFFICIENTS OF CORRELATIONS OF 8.0 + MG LEAD  PER 100


 GRAMS OF TOOTH TISSUE, OF TEACHER EVALUATIONS IN 25 CLEVELAND  PUBLIC


 SCHOOLS AND ATMOSPHERIC SCORES FOR THE AIR STATIONS IN WHICH THE  SCHOOLS ARE


 LOCATED.  THE PERCENT OF LEFT HANDED AND MEDICATION, AND THE SCORES OF


 PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, AND LEARNING SYMPTOMS OF LEAD POISONING WERE ITEMS


 INCLUDED IN THE EVALUATIONS BY TEACHERS


% Left Handed
Medication
Physical
Emotional
8+ Tooth
Pb
- -313^
N = 25
- .31*08
N = 23
s = .056
- .2300
N = 25
S » .13!*
- .2301*
N = 25
S = .13^
Psrticulate
- -1393
N = 25
S = .253
.0203
N a 23
S = ,1*63
.0569
N = 25
S = .393
.1370
N = 25
S = .257
Air Pb
- .01*79
N » 19
S = ,1*23
.01*30
N » 19
S = A31
.i^56
N = 19
s = ,028
.5^85
N = 19
s = .008
Air Cd
--.2919
N » 19
S = .113
.27^3
N a 19
S = .128
.2697
N = 19
s = .132
N = 19
S a .036
Air Sb
-.1192
N s 18
s = .319
.2707
N = 18
S = .139
.1696
N « 18
s = .251
.2305
If = 18
s = .179
Air S02
- -399^
N = 21
s » .036
-.1682
N = 19
S = .2^6
- .0005
N o 21
S = .1*99
- .1099
N » 21
s = .318
               -  .1615       .2164      .U?79      .2008  -    .0909       .073^
Learning        N = 25     N = 25     N =  19     N » 19     N = 18      N » 21
            •  S = .220   s = .1^9   S  » .019   S = .205   S = .360    s » .376
                                      150

-------
TABLE 70   SPEARMAN CORRELATIONS OF 8.0 + MG LEAD PER 100 GRAMS OF TOOTH




TISSUE, TEACHER EVALUATIONS IN 25 CLEVELAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND ATMOSPHERIC




SCORES FOR THE. AIR STATIONS IN TOUCH THE SCHOOLS ARE LOCATED.  THE PERCENT




OF LEFT HANDED (% LEFT) AND MEDICATION (MED), AND THE SCORES OF PHYSICAL,




EMOTIONAL, AND LEARNING SYMPTOMS OF LEAD POISONING WERE ITEMS INCLUDED IN




THE EVALUATIONS BY TEACHERS
,


% Left Handed


Medication


Physical

4
Emotional


Learning

8.0 + mg
Tooth
- .3132
N a 25
S a .061+
- .i+2l+6
N = 23
S a .022
- .155*4-
N a 25
S a .229
- .1870
N a 25
S = .185
--1391
N a 25
S a .254
Parti culate Air Pb
- .1271
N a 25
S a ,272
- .1181
N a 23
S a ,296
.1692
N = 25
S a .209
.02^3
N = 25
S = .U5U
.1908
N a 25
S a .180
- .0631
N a 19
S a .399
- .01+81
N = 19
S = .1+23
MQ5
N = 19
S a ,019
.5881+
N = 19
S = .001+
.H313
N = 19
S = .033
Air Cd
- .3573
N a 1
-------












Q
5
2
W
w

u

p,,
o
<&
CO
OS

CO
CO
z
UJ

HJ


z
rH

z


Q
5
rj

Q
o

*
IM^
rH
tt.
o

co
z
o
M
t-;

2j
J_J
^r*
>

OS

H
u
<:
r t



rH
r--
UJ
00
E-
X

TJ
fi C
rt rH
o
•H
w
x o
a. z




X
 O
J Z



C o\°
o
•H
p
CtJ
O

^ •
 o
J Z



O G
(U
(D 13
rA rH
S -H

Z O


^
&
t/>

IO vO vO rH F^ vO LO
• •••..•
tO tO tO CM CM CM rt"




^^ t — • CJl \O O% rH OO
CT> OO vO ^t O CT> to
Ol 'd- CM IO CM rH




CM O OO vO LO tO OO
t*^ o^ c^ vo r^ oo t^-
rH



t^- i — t vo o o r-^ to
tO VO O^ rH ^ tO ^j"
rH t^ CM CM CM 00 tO
•\ •» *» «\
tO rH rH rH


rH LO O 'd' VO IO CM
£"*•• OO C^ vO *^D l^* ^O
rH




rH C?> OO rH LO Tf rH
OO vO CM ^f vO OO O^
CM rH OO rH t~x LO rH
•s «t
CM rH


rH Is- ^t CJ1 CM rH O

CM rH rH r-l CM CM tO





Cft «* LO vO VO CM tO
OO tO rH tO tO rH



CM OO O CJi ^" l^x O>
• ••••••
O r~- rH OO 00 OO OO
rH rH



O"l t^J CM OO CJ^ ^f O^
Tf- LO tO CM to O to
'J- i— 1 rH rH rH





O LO 1^- VO VD OO OO
OO LO ^J" rH LO O tO
TJ CT> Tf tO VO rH Tf
A n «\ rt «v
rl" rH i— 1 rH rH




rH CM IO ** LO vO t^-

"T3
C
CTl

c
o
•H
rt
* O
^ -H
., 0)
N e
50
C
•H
• H
O
U
(L)
rH
xj O
30 r^
•\
DO O
P
-
O
c
r^1-

'O
P3
aj
/5 13
CT> 

g
^f 13
^f P*
°
rH rC!
i i

t/)
P
O <1)
o t/>
•«t a>
rH
j ^ f"L,
rH 4>

J ".
H O
0 ^
H =





























•
t/)
rH
O
r&
O
CTJ
O
+->


A
X
*o


u
p
rH
O
OH
(U
fn

t/)
crj

P
1)
t/)
U
rH
f-^l
t/1
P
•H
aj
rH
P
tP,
O

^
U

6
C
0)
p
152

-------

tin 0\°
0
O rt
o o
U to
cn x •
-C O
"•^^ D *~zr
l>* l-M rfl.
^3*
H

fu
^
tU <-< o\°
i-J rt
tu c
o
tU -H
rH O •
Z SO
tu z
rH

Z
tu
Di
Q bOo\«
J C
(—1 «H
IT* C
U rH
rt •
t^ (DO
cn -J Z
^T

u.
o

cn o o\°
Z -H
O 4->
rH rt
E-H 0
•< -H
^~i "T3 •
•J 

PJ (DO
C^ r-3 2
<^

>-! PQ
CO Di
>- OQ 4-1
a: 3 o c
^ cn CD
g pj a) -d
5 Z ,£> t-H
cn o § -H
3 ,c
Z u
(XI
r-.
CQ ^G>
< '00
H <
C^J t^ C^J LO
• • • »
\O (^O to tO



C^ Is"" C^ ^^
v£> to r-- LO




O i-H vD O
k • • *
O f^ 00 OO
rH



CN OO vO O
rh r^, oo rH
rH tO r}- LO




S^- ^ rj- (N
• • • •
^o LO oo cn



t^- rH LO cn
\o o to o
CN tO r}-




f^ ^^, cn ^^
• • • •
O i— 1 rH rH






O Cn rH rH




LO \O LO LO
• • • •
to cn oo o
rH




LO i— i oo r-
LO ** \O








CN rf oo cn
rr to ^o to
1-H LO LO VD





LO \O t~~ 00
Tj- tO rH tO
• • • •
CN CN CN tO



i~~ o cn vo
rH CN cn CN




rH CN t-~ OO

r^ \o LO LO




i-- cn to CN
00 LO t^. i-l
•<* ^f to to




00 ^O OO vO
• • • •
LO I-~ \O f~



cn 1-1 to r--
r^- cn r-4 oo
CN to to CN




oo \o to CN
• • • •
CN rH CN CN






cn CN LO CN




'•O f— * to cn
• • • •
00 O CN rH
rH rH rH




Cn •* rH rt
LO t^ OO \O








to LO oo oo
OO tO LO tO
\o t^ \o LO




O i-H CN
Cn r-H i-H rH



"B
n)
C
^t o
cn -H
w^ 4^
rt
O
•H
TJ
CD
e

bO
C
•H
•rH
t-^ CD
to o
rH CD
to
CD
rd

O
4-}



o
rH C
00 ^!
CN W
11
u
*"cJ rt
a) CD
""O 4-*
c
rt CD
*£< _f^
+j
^_i
M-l X

rH rH
*T3 O
rH CL|
,_j Q\

o
to
fH rt
o
4J
^ C
0 (U
O) ,0 V)
^" S C)
^* 3 (-1
C DH

0) W
4-> -H
rt
tO rH
4-J 4-*
G
t~- CD <4H
cn to o
t CD
rH !H
CD rQ

O O CD
H Z rC
r 4->
153

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
       EPA-600/1-78-053
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION" NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  BIOLOGICAL  INDICATOR OF SUMMATIONAL  EXPOSURES TO LEAD
  Tooth Lead  in  Children Living  in  Cleveland and its
  Suburbs
             5. REPORT DATE
                August 1978
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Margaret A.  Kelsall  and Ruth E. Hunter
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
  Ohio Mental  Health and Mental Retardation Research Center
  1708 Aiken Avenue
  Columbus, Ohio
                    1AA601
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                    R-804632
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Health Effects  Research Laboratory
  Office of Research and Development
  U.,S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
RTP, NC
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                    EPA 600/11
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT

       An epidemiologic study of  the  distribution of  lead  absorption in the  Cleveland
  Metropolitan  Area was carried out by analyzing the  lead  content of shed  or extracted
  deciduous  teeth  of n,241 children. Mean amounts  of  lead in teeth of children
  living in  some  suburbs were as  high as those for  children living within  the city
  of Cleveland.   Levels of lead in teeth declined with  increasing age at tooth loss.
  Efforts were  made to relate tooth lead levels to  various environmental sources of
  lead.  Also teacher evaluations of  children's school  performance and behavior were
  assessed in regard to tooth lead level and environmental exposure.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           c.  COSATI Field/Group
  lead
  teeth
  children
  epidemiology
 Cleveland
06 F, T
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  RELEASE TO  PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
   UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                          21. NO. OF PAGES
 169
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                 UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                          22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                             154

-------