EPA-600/2-77-029a
                                   June  1977
         REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF

  DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

                 Volume I
                    by

              Louis R. Reader
              James H. Cobbs
            John W. Field, Jr.
             William D. Finley
             Steven C. Vokurka
             Bernard N. Rolfe
      Louis R. Reeder and Associates
          Tulsa, Oklahoma  74135
          Contract No. 68-03-2013
              Project Officer

             Carlton C. Wiles
Solid and Hazardous Waste Research Division
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
          Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
    OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
   U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          CINCINNATI, OHIO  45268
                      - -  .
                      TAL PROTECTION

-------
                          DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Environmental
Research Laboratory, U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
and approved for publication.  Approval does not signify that
the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,  nor does mention of
trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                               11

-------
                      FOREWORD
The Environmental Protection Agency was created because of
increasing public and government concern about the dangers
of pollution to the health and welfare of the American
people.  Noxious air, foul water, and spoiled land are
tragic testimony to the deterioration of our natural en-
vironment.  The complexity of that environment and the
interplay between its components require a concentrated
and integrated attack on the problem.

Research and development is that necessary first step in
problem solution and it involves defining the problem,
measuring its impact, and searching for solutions.  The
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory develops new
and improved technology and systems for the prevention,
treatment, and management of wastewater and solid and
hazardous waste pollutant discharges from municpal and
community sources, for the preservation and treatment of
public drinking water supplies, and to minimize the ad-
verse economic, social, health, and aesthetic efforts of
pollution.  This publication is one of the products of
that research; a most vital communications link between
the researcher and the user community.

This contract was supported by the EPA to provide a compre-
hensive review and data compilation of deep-well injection
as a control and disposal technology for hazardous waste.
Because of the large amount of information resulting from
this contract, the report is divided into four volumes.
Readers interested only in the general information about
deep-wells are referred to Volume I.  Those interested in
the detailed data compiled during this work are referred
to the remaining volumes in addition to Volume I.  The in-
formation is providing input into the EPA's program for
assessing control technologies available for managing the
Nation's large quantities of hazardous materials.
                          Francis T. Mayo, Director
                          Municipal Environmental Research
                          Laboratory
                            111

-------
                        ABSTRACT
A review and analysis of the available information related
to deep-well injection, and an assessment as to the adequacy
of this method for managing hazardous wastes and ensuring
protecting the environment was made.

One hundred-five deep-well related research projects were
identified and hazardous waste research projects numbered
186.  More than 1,000 papers related to deep-well injection
of industrial waste were reviewed.

Geologic and engineering data are available in many areas to
locate, design and operate a deep-well system receiving
hazardous wastes.  The most serious problems encountered are
because of failure to use available geologic information and
accepted and proven engineering practices in design and com-
pletion.  A small group of waste chemicals with high human
and ecological hazard ratings, little known degradability
characteristics or long persistence times are identified as
undesirable for injection unless containment within the host
reservoir is certain.

There is a paucity of information on salaquifer chemistry,
and the chemical and microbiological reactions of waste
within a receiving salaquifer.  Monitoring of deep-well
systems needs to be developed into a predictive tool to
be fully effective.

State statues and regulations vary greatly on deep-well
injection.  To alleviate any problems arising from the
use of interstate aquifers for injection, and for more
effective management and control of deep-well systems,
a standardization of regulations is considered necessary.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of EPA Contract
68-03-2103.  The report is comprised of 4 volumes; the
main text, Appendices A through C, Appendix D, and
Appendices E through J.  This volume is the main text
and is comprised of an executive summary and sections on
the geologic, engineering, chemical, microbilogical, and
other aspects important in the environmental and techno-
logical evaluations of injecting hazardous waste into
                             IV

-------
deep-wells.  Other volumes are appendices which are
detailed compilations of data about deep-wells.

As a result of EPA review of this document, there were
a number of questions and issues raised as to the  con-
clusions made versus those warranted based upon avail-
able information.  The user is referred to Appendix J
for additional information resulting from this review
and the contractors response to that review.
                          v

-------
                         CONTENTS


                                                       Page

Foreword                                                iii

Abstract                                                 iv

List of Figures                                         xii

List of Tables                                         xxiv

Acknowledgements                                      xxvii

Sections

I     Executive Summary                                   1

          Assessment                                      1

              Geological                                  1
              Engineering                                 2
              Microbiological                             2
              Chemical                                    3
              Brine                                       7
              Sewage                                      8
              Monitoring                                  8
              Legislation                                 8
              Legal                                       9

          Conclusions                                     9
          Recommendations                                13
          References Cited                               37

II    Introduction                                       38

          Purpose of this Report   '                      38
          Scope of this Report                           38
          Deep-Well Injection                            39

              Concept                                    40
              Philosophy                                 40
                            vn

-------
CONTENTS  (continued)


                                                       Page

II    Introduction  (continued)

          Background of Deep-Well Experience             41
          References Cited                               45

III   Deep-Well Injection of Hazardous
        Industrial Wastes                                47

          Geologic Aspects                               47

              Geologically Acceptable Areas              49
              Seismicity                                 51
              Reservoir Requirements                     53
              Compressibility                            57
              Radial Fluid Travel                        63
              Water Salinity                             66

          Engineering Aspects                            68

              Completion Types Illustrated               72

          Chemical Aspects                               76

              Chemical Effects on the Environment        76
              Preinjection Treatment                     79
              Reactions                                  80

          Microbiological Aspects                        82
          Ground Water Use                               84
          Monitoring                                     87

              Surface Equipment                          87
              Operation of Well Equipment                87
              Injection Face Operation                   88
              Reservoir Fluid Behavior                   88

          References Cited                               91
                            Vlll

-------
CONTENTS   (continued)


                                                       Page

IV    Characterization of Waste                          95

          Introduction                                   95
          Problems of Analyzing Toxic and
            Hazardous Waste Effects                      96

              Human Effects Data Limitations             96
              Ecological Impact                          97
              Time Factors                               98

          Hazardous Waste and Waste Streams              98

              Identification                             98
              Evaluation Problems                        99
              Characteristics                           101

          Potentially Hazardous Waste Being Injected    101

              Wells Injecting Hazardous Waste           103
              Environmental Implications                103

          Wastes of Unknown Hazard Potential
            Being Injected                              104

              Brine                                     104
              Sewage                                    105

          Volume of Waste                               105
          References Cited                              107

V     Well Inventory and Case Histories                 108

          Number of Wells                               108
          Well Status and Data                          108
          Projected Growth of Deep-Well Systems         111
                             IX

-------
CONTENTS  (continued)


                                                       Page

V     Well Inventory and Case Histories (continued)

          Case Histories                                115
          References Cited                              116

VI    Research Projects Related to Deep-Well
        Injection of Waste                              117

          Deep-Well Research                            117

              Government Funded                         117
              Privately Funded                          121
              Research Summary                          121

          Treatment of Hazardous Waste Research         122
          References Cited                              123

VII   Economics of Deep-Well Systems                    124

          Cost Factor Comparison                        124
          Method Cost Comparison                        128
          Cost Examples                                 130
          References Cited                              132

VIII  Legal Considerations                              133

          Nuisance                                      135
          Negligence                                    136
          Liability Without Fault                       136
          Trespass                                      137
          Conditional Fault                             140
          Summary                                       143
          References Cited                              144

-------
CONTENTS  (continued)
IX    Legislative and Regulatory Considerations

          State Controls
          Federal Controls
          References Cited
X

XI
Glossary of Terms
Appendix A
Appendix B

Appendix C
Appendix D
      Appendix E
      Appendix F
      Appendix G -

      Appendix H -


      Appendix I -


      Appendix J
Bibliography
Patents  Related  to
  Deep-Well Systems
Waste Characterization  Profiles
Inventory  of  Industrial Waste
  Injection Wells in  the United
  States
Case Histories
Recent Microbiological  Research
  Including Wilmington  and Belle
  Glade  Case  Studies
Summary  of Research Related to
  Deep-Well Injection
Summary  of Research Projects
  Related  to  the Treatment of
  Hazardous Wastes
Inventory  of  Legislation,
  Regulations, and Policy
  Governing Deep-Well Injection
EPA Review Comments and Contractor
  Response
145
149
152

153

187

294
296
                                                   494
                                                  1045
                                                  1070

                                                  1129


                                                  1239
                                                  1254
                                                  1402
                             XI

-------
                           FIGURES
No.                                                    Page

  1   Relationship of EPA Regions to Geomorphic
        Regions in the United States                     16

  2   Growth of Operating Deep-Well Injection
        Systems in the United States                     41

  3   Site Suitability for Deep-Well Injection
        of Industrial Waste                              48

  4   Geologic Features Significant in Evaluating
        Sites for Deep-Well Injection                    50

  5   Seismic Risk Areas of the United States            52

  6   Pressure Distribution Away from the Wellbore
        of a Hypothetical Reservoir                      64

  7   Effect of Formation Thickness on the Radius
        of Injected Fluid Migration                      67

  8   Completion Recommended for Maximum Protection
        During Waste Injection                           71

  9   Basic Well Casing Programs Used in Waste-
        Injection Well Completions                       73

 10   Three Types of Completions Used in Waste-
        Injection Wells                                  74

 11   Depth to Saline Ground Water in the
        Contiguous United States                         86

 12   Average U. S. Well Cost                           125

 13   Relative Cost Index of Oil & Gas Wells            126

 14   Relative Cost for Conditioning Plants             127
                            Xll

-------
FIGURES  (continued)




No.                                                    Page




 15   Relative Conditioning Cost                        128




 16   Unit Disposal Costs Compared                      129




 17   Cost of Injection                                 130




 18   Radius of Invasion for Well AL-1                  516




 19   Radius of Invasion for Well AL-3                  519




 20   Radius of Invasion for Well TN-2                  543




 21   Radius of Invasion for Well IL-2                  548




 22   Radius of Invasion for Well IL-5                  552




 23   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-3                  559




 24   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-5                  562




 25   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-6                  564




 26   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-7                  566




 27   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-8                  568




 28   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-9                  570




 29   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-10                 572




 30   Radius of Invasion for Well IN-11                 574




 31   Radius of Invasion for Well MI-13                 590




 32   Radius of Invasion for Well MI-26                 604




 33   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-2                  615
                            Xlll

-------
FIGURES  (continued)

No.                                                    Paqe
 34   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-3                  617

 35   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-4                  619

 36   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-5                  621

 37   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-6                  623

 38   Radius of Invasion for Well OH-9                  627

 39   Location Map of Wells LA-2, 2, 3, 67              631

 40   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-1                  632

 41   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-2                  634

 42   Location Map of Wells LA-5, 6, 7                  638

 43   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-5                  639

 44   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-6                  641

 45   Location Map of Wells LA-8 , 85                    644

 46   Location Map of Wells LA-9, 10                    646

 47   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-10                 648

 48   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-11                 650

 49   Location Map of Well LA-12                        652

 50   Location Map of Wells LA-13, 14, 15, 16,
        17, 18, 73                                      654

 51   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-14                 656

 52   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-15                 658
                             xiv

-------
FIGURES  (continued)




No.                                                    Page




 53   Location Map of Well LA-19                        663




 54   Location Map of Well LA-21                        666




 55   Location Map of Well LA-22                        668




 56   Location Map of Wells LA-26, 27                   673




 57   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-27                 675




 58   Location Map of Well LA-28                        677




 59   Location Map of Well LA-29                        679




 60   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-29                 680




 61   Location Map of Wells LA-30, 31, 32               682




 62   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-30                 683




 63   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-31                 685




 64   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-32                 687




 65   Location Map of Wells LA-33, 65, 66               689




 66   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-33                 690




 67   Location Map of Wells LA-34, 37                   692




 68   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-34                 693




 69   Location Map of Wells LA-35, 36                   695




 70   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-35                 696




 71   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-36                 698
                             xv

-------
FIGURES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page

 72   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-37                 700

 73   Location Map of Wells LA-38, 39, 40,
        41, 42, 69, 76                                  702

 74   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-39                 704

 75   Radius of Invasion' for Well LA-40                 706

 76   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-41                 708

 77   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-42                 710

 78   Location Map of Wells LA-43, 44                   712

 79   Location Map of Well LA-45                        715

 80   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-45                 716

 81   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-46                 718

 82   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-47                 720

 83   Location Map of Wells LA-48, 49, 50,
        70, 77, 78                                      722

 84   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-48                 723

 85   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-49                 725

 86   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-52                 729

 87   Location Map of Wells LA-53, 68, 75               731

 88   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-53                 732

 89   Location Map of Well LA-55                        735
                            xvi

-------
FIGURES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page

 90   Location Map of Wells LA-56, 59                   737

 91   Location Map of Wells LA-57, 58                   739

 92   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-59                 742

 93   Location Map of Wells LA-62, 74                   746

 94   Location Map of Wells LA-63, 64                   748

 95   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-65                 751

 96   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-68                 755

 97   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-69                 757

 98   Radius of Invasion for Well LA-73                 762

 99   Location Map of Well LA-79                        769

100   Location Map of Wells LA-80, 81                   771

101   Radius of Invasion for Well OK-6                  784

102   Radius of Invasion for Well OK-7                  786

103   Radius of Invasion for Well OK-13                 793

104   Location Map of Wells TX-1, 2,  13,  118            797

105   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-1                  798

106   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-3                  801

107   Location Map of Wells TX-4 , 28, 29,  30,
        105, 106                                        803

108   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-4                  804
                            xvn

-------
FIGURES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page

109   Location Map of Well TX-5                         806

110   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-7                  809

111   Location Map of Wells TX-8, 14, 32, 49, 110       811

112   Location Map of Well TX-10                        814

113   Location Map of Well TX-11                        816

114   Location Map of Wells TX-12, 23, 54, 55,
        56, 57, 104                                     818

115   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-14                 821

116   Location Map of Well TX-15                        823

117   Location Map of Well TX-16                        825

118   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-16                 826

119   Location Map of Well TX-17                        828

120   Location Map of Well TX-18                        830

121   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-18                 831

122   Location Map of Well TX-19                        833

123   Location Map of Wells TX-20, 102                  835

124   Location Map of Wells TX-21, 31, 47               837

125   Location Map of Well TX-26                        843

126   Location Map of Wells TX-27, 108                  845

127   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-29                 848
                           xvm

-------
FIGURES  (continued)




No.                                                    Page




128   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-32                 852




129   Location Map of Wells TX-33, 45, 69               854




130   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-34                 856




131   Location Map of Well TX-35                        858




132   Location Map of Wells TX-36, 37                   860




133   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-36                 861




134   Location Map of Well TX-40                        866




135   Location Map of Wells TX-41, 64, 65, 66           868




136   Location Map of Wells TX-44, 107                  872




137   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-44                 873




138   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-45                 875




139   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-49                 880




140   Location Map of Wells TX-51, 99                   883




141   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-51                 884




142   Location Map of Wells TX-52, 53                   886




143   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-54                 889




144   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-55                 891




145   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-56                 893




146   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-57                 895




147   Location Map of Wells TX-59, 71                   898
                            xix

-------
FIGURES  (continued)




No.                                                    Page




148   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-61                 901




149   Location Map of Wells TX-67, 68, 87               908




150   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-69                 911




151   Location Map of Well TX-70                        913




152   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-70                 914




153   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-71                 916




154   Location Map of Well TX-73                        919




155   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-73                 920




156   Location Map of Well TX-76                        924




157   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-76                 925




158   Location Map of Well TX-77                        927




159   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-78                 929




160   Location Map of Wells TX-79, 109                  931




161   Location Map of Well TX-80                        933




162   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-80                 934




163   Location Map of Well TX-81                        936




164   Location Map of Wells TX-82 , 83                   938




165   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-82                 939




166   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-83                 941
                             xx

-------
FIGURES  (continued)




No.                                                    Page




167   Location Map of Well TX-84                        943




168   Location Map of Well TX-85                        945




169   Location Map of Well TX-86                        947




170   Location Map of Well TX-88                        950




171   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-88                 951




172   Location Map of Well TX-91                        955




173   Location Map of Well TX-92                        957




174   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-92                 958




175   Location Map of Wells TX-97, 98                   964




176   Location Map of Wells TX-100, 101                 968




177   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-100                969




178   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-101                971




179   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-105                976




180   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-106                978




181   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-107                980




182   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-109                983




183   Location Map of Well TX-111                       986




184   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-111                987




185   Location Map of Well TX-112                       989
                            xxi

-------
FIGURES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page

186   Radius of Invasion for Well TX-118                996

187   Radius of Invasion for Well WY-1                 1031

188   Radius of Invasion for Well CA-2                 1034

189   Radius of Invasion for Well CA-3                 1036

190   Radius of Invasion for Well CA-4                 1038

191   Construction and Assembly of Porous-
        Medium Test Column                             1077

192   Rotating Tremie and Vibration System for
        Packing Test Column with Sand                  1078

193   Scanning Electron Micrograph of Vortex-
        Shaped Organic Deposit in Interstitial
        Opening in Porous Medium                       1081

194   Pits in Stainless Steel Screen Due to
        Bacterial Growth During 10-Day Period          1081

195   A Representative Monitor Well                    1083

196   Schematic Hydrogeologic Section Between
        Belle Glade Area and Straits of Florida        1087

197   Index Map of Belle Glade Area and
        Potentiometric-Surface Map of Floridian
        Aquifer in South Florida                       1088

198   Diagram of Industrial Waste Injection and
        Monitoring System, Prior to Deepening
        Injection Well                                 1089

199   Volume of Waste Injected Versus Time             1092
                            xxn

-------
FIGURES   (continued)

No.                                                    Page

200   Map of the Injection System                      1C99

201   Cross Section of the Injection and
        Monitoring System                              1104

202   Monitor Well 14                                  1105

203   Anaerobic Jar with Disposable Gas-Generator
        Envelopes and Anaerobic Indicators
        Containing Plates                              1113

204   Ratio of Number of Bacteria to DOC (mg/1)
        in Waste Front (Well 14)                        1117

205   A Biogeochemical Model of Waste Movement.
        and Transformation                             1118

206   Mass Culture for Quantitative Gas Analysis       1121

207   Pressure Chamber Showing Pressure Culture
        Tube Partially Inserted                        1122

208   Pressure Chamber Culture Tube Showing
        Diaphragm Seal Cap                             1122

209   Method of Filling and Sampling Gases
        in Culture Tubes                               1123

210   Methane Bacteria Colonies (White Circles)
        in Gas Filled Culture Tube                     1124
                          XXlll

-------
                          TABLES
No.                                                    Page

 1    Acceptability of Deep-Well Industrial Waste
        Injection to Environmental Regime                17

 2    Identification of Wells Receiving Hazardous
        Wastes                                           27

 3    Assessment of Operating Deep-Wells Receiving
        Hazardous Wastes                                 28

 4    Standard Industrial Classification of
        Injection Wells                                  42

 5    Reservoir Rock Type and Age                        43

 6    Well Completion Depths                             44

 7    Calculated Effect of Stimulation of an
        Injection Well                                   61

 8    Groundwater Use in the Contiguous United
        States for 1970                                  85

 9    Permit Status of Injection Wells                  109

10    Operating Status of Injection Wells               110

11    Industrial Index Based on Predicast               112

12    Drilled Industrial Waste Storage Wells
        Forecast Through 1985 Based on Predicast
        Index                                           113

13    Operating Industrial Waste Storage Wells
        Forecast Through 1985 Based on Predicast
        Index                                           114
                            XX IV

-------
TABLES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page
14    Economic Comparison of Deep-Well Systems
        and Surface Treatment                           131

15    Deep-Well Facility Average Operating Cost         131

16    Reporting Parameters Required by State
        Statutes or Designated State Agency
        Rules for the Permitting and Operation
        of Deep-Well Disposal Systems                   151

17    Typical Metal Finishing Waste Streams
        Containing Chromium                             346

18    Mercury Consumed in United States by Uses         437

19    Trends in Uses of Mercury Over the Period
        1967 to 1971                                    438

20    Estimated Trends in Consumption of Mercury        439

21    Environmental Limits for Growth and
        Reproduction of Selected Microorganisms        1070

22    A List of General Nutritional Requirements       1073

23    Physical Parameters of Porous-Media Flow         1078

24    Chemical Analyses - Native-Aquifer Fluids,
        Belle Glade Area                               1086

25    Chemical Analyses — Injected Industrial
        Waste, Belle Glade, Florida                    1090

26    Chemical Analyses -- Injection — Zone
        Fluids Following Waste Emplacement,
        Belle Glade, Florida                           1093
                            XXV

-------
TABLES  (continued)

No.                                                    Page

27    Chemical Analyses — Shallow Monitor Well,
        Belle Glade, Florida                           1095

28    Chronology of Waste Injection                    1100

29    Partial Chemical Composition of Injected
        Waste                                          1106

30    Chemical Analysis of Native Aquifer Water        1108

31    Comparison of Waste-Free and Waste-
        Contaminated Salaquifer Water from
        Monitor Wells                                  1109

32    Gas Analysis from Well 14                        1111

33    Identification of Isolates from Unpolluted
        Deep-Well (Well 11)                             1114

34    Comparison of Microbial Counts, Organic
        Carbon, Percent Methane, and Iron
        Content of Samples Obtained from Well 14       1116

35    Summary of Research Projects Related to
        the Treatment of Hazardous Wastes              1240
                            xxvi

-------
                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The support and advice of Mr. Carlton C. Wiles, EPA
Project Officer, was instrumental in guiding the work
to a conclusion.  The information given by the personnel
of the EPA regional offices was helpful and greatly ap-
preciated.  Conversations with Mr. E. C. Donaldson of
the U. S. Bureau of Mines, Bartlesville Energy Research
Center and Leslie G. McMillion of the EPA, Las Vegas,
Nevada, provided much needed information.  Drs. G. G.
Ehrlich and J. A. Leenheer of the U. S. Geological Sur-
vey contributed greatly to the microbiological data used
in this report.

Data furnished by the personnel of the regulatory
agencies of Arkansas, California, Colorado, Kansas,
Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Oklahoma was extremely
helpful in compiling this final report.  The assis-
tance of Messrs. A. C. Chauviere and R. D. Bates of
the Louisiana Geological Oil and Gas Division; and
Messrs. Bob Hill and W. A. Trippet, II, of the Texas
Water Quality Board in acquiring data from their states
contributed greatly to this report and is acknowledged
as is the contribution of Mr. Robert E. Kidd of the
Geological Survey of Alabama.

Conversations with Mr. W. F. Hower of the Halliburton
Company, Messrs. J. S. Talbot and J. Laman of the Dow
Chemical Company, and Mr. A. C. Barlow of E. I. du Pont
de Nemours & Co., Inc., aided greatly in preparing por-
tions of this report.

Information received from Dr. W. R. Walker of Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and Drs. C. D. Haynes and Everett
Brett of the University of Alabama provided much needed
information on research in progress.  Dr. G. H. Elkan
of the University of North Carolina contributed much
valuable data on the role of microorganisms related
to deep-well injection.
                         XXVll

-------
Consultation on chemical aspects of portions of the
project was given by Dr. Zuhair Al-Shaieb and Mr.
L. C. Reynolds.

The secretarial efforts of Ms.  Linda Cullison, Mary
Latimer, Joan Wirt, Cynthia Toney, Jean Jolly, and
Brenda Scarff are gratefully acknowledged.   Contri-
butions to the drafting were made by Messrs. Frank
M. Pease, Bill C. Woods, S. R.  Nelson, and Ms. Nan
Brainerd.  Dr. Roy W. Graves, and Ms. Jean Reader
served as technical editors.
                        XXVlll

-------
                        SECTION I

                    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to make an assessment of
deep-well injection as a method to manage hazardous in-
dustrial wastes and ensure protection of the environment.
Data were compiled from June to October 1974.  Sources of
information were existing literature, government agencies,
individuals knowledgeable in deep-well techniques and
industries using deep-wells as a waste management method.
The review is intended to be as comprehensive as possible
within the framework of available time and readily acces-
sible material, and to show the strength and weakness of
deep-well injection as an effective hazardous waste manage-
ment tool.

ASSESSMENT

Geological

Enough geologic information is available in the United
States to define areas in which deep-well injection is
feasible and may be performed safely, areas where injec-
tion is possible but may produce detrimental effects to
the environment, and areas where injection is either im-
possible, marginal, or will definitely have detrimental
environmental effects.

Figure 1 found at the end of Section I is a physiographic
map of the United States.  The broad geomorphic regions
used in this report have been outlined on it as have the
EPA regions in order to show their geographic relationship.
This figure is to be used for reference in conjunction with
Tables 1, 2 and 3.  Table 1, also found at the end of this
section, is a summary of broad geomorphic areas of the con-
tiguous United States and classifies them as to apparent
geologic compatibility with deep-well injection and will,
in most cases, serve to identify areas which may or may not
be feasible for safe injection.   Detailed investigation,
however, must still be made for any given well site within
an area rated as acceptable in the table.

-------
The feasibility of a well site within an acceptable area
may effectively be determined by using as reservoir guide-
lines the ten criteria of:  1) uniformity, 2)  large areal
extent, 3)  substantial thickness, 4)  high porosity and
permeability, 5)  low pressure 6) a sal aquifer, 7) separa-
tion from fresh water horizons, 8)  adequate overlying and
underlying aquicludes, 9) no poorly plugged wells nearby
and 10) compatibility between the mineralogy and fluids
of the reservoir and the injected wastes.  A reservoir so
chosen will have the capability to contain safely, any
waste that may be injected into it provided the injected
volume does not exceed the available volume of the reser-
voir and injection pressures do not e;xceed critical forma-
tion pressures.  These criteria for reservoir selection
do not, however, preclude the integrity of the reservoir
later being destroyed by operating improprieties or a
force of nature such as earthquake rendering invalid the
concept of containment and permitting fluid escape.

Engineering

Well design and construction, as of the date of this report,
is adequate to handle safely the wastes now being injected
and has the capability to handle any known wastes that may
be added in the foreseeable future.

The design of a given system must be based upon the type
reservoir, its transmissibility and storage capacity, the
volume of waste to be injected, the rate at which it is to
be injected, and the type of waste.  No deep-well system
can be designed and installed with the expectation of a
successful operating life unless the effects of all the
parameters related to the reservoir, the waste and the
physical dimensions of the well are incorporated into
the design.

Operating limitations must be established for every well
to ensure that the limits of the equipment, the reservoir
and the confining beds are not exceeded, and the waste
released from the well bore or the host salaquifer.

Microbiological

Deep-well toxic waste injection has become one solution
to the disposal of problem liquid wastes.  Very little,

-------
however, has been done to examine the native flora of in-
jection zone salaquifers.  The effects of microorganisms
on the injected wastes and injection zone salaquifers have
not been determined except in a few studies.  Seldom con-
sidered is the effect of microorganisms on the entire in-
jection process from possible plugging effects of microbial
growth to changes effected on the waste by microbial meta-
bolic activities.

The studies which have considered microbial effects clearly
show that the waste will be acted upon by microorganisms
after it has been diluted by native aquifer water to con-
ditions suitable for microbial metabolism.  If the dilution
and injection rates are carefully controlled, it may be
possible to design microbial degradation of certain wastes
in the injection aquifer.  The transformations will vary
according to the waste and biogeochemical reactions in the
aquifer.  The products of microbial action may be combina-
tions of C02 / H2S , and
The emergence of waste and/or products of the waste degra-
dation may have effects on aquatic life in surface waters
and may affect groundwater quality.  What these effects may
be are unknown at this time.

Viruses are known to survive outside the cells of their
hosts, but nothing is known of their role in connection
with waste injection.  An in-depth study should be per-
formed of the yeasts and viruses in subsurface waste in-
jection.

Research is needed to provide a rational rather than an
empirical basis for design and operation of deep-well
toxic waste injection systems.  Intensification of
research, in which cooperative efforts of biologists,
chemists, engineers, hydrologists , and geologists are
needed, is required to ensure the continued safety of
groundwater resources .

Chemical

A review of the chemicals contained in waste streams cur-
rently being injected into deep disposal wells was made

-------
to determine the potential hazards for deep-well injection.
In performing the analysis, the toxicology, the degradabil-
ity, the water solubility and the possible reactions were
the main criteria considered.  Some chemicals are highly
toxic and possess other undesirable characteristics that
make them unsafe for any system involving long-term storage.
Other chemicals create problems because of their effect on
the well systems.  Acids can corrode certain types of casing
or may react to dissolve the confining beds, also the grout
sealing the pipe in the confining beds is subject to attack
by some chemicals.  Examples of the deterioration of well
systems have been given in the sub-section on chemical as-
pects.  The corrosion of the well materials and dissolution
of the confining beds to allow leakage into shallower aqui-
fers, or other usable mineral resources is one of the haz-
ards of deep-well injection.

It must be emphasized that if waste is generated, there
has to be a means of disposing of it and in some cases
there may not be a safer method than deep-well injection.
A waste, even of low toxicity would net be safe for injec-
tion if the injection well were not constructed in a way
which would prevent leakage, and if a proper host zone were
not selected.  The reverse would also be true.  If the well
could be so constructed and the receiving salaquifer could
be selected so that there could never be a possibility of
escape, then it would be safe to inject any type of waste,
regardless of how toxic or how hazardous it might be.

With especially hazardous materials which have long persis-
tence periods, the long storage time necessary makes it
more hazardous for these materials to be disposed of into
deep-wells.  Where extended storage; time is necessary, the
risk is increased due to the possibility of escape from the
storage area through failure of the system or migration of
the water.  Because there is very little factual information
concerning the persistence period of some compounds, or the
reactions within an aquifer, this is an area where more re-
search is needed.

The chemicals considered to be hazardous for deep-well in-
jection in any system are:

-------
                acrolein

                arsenic and  arsenic  compounds

                cadmium and  cadmium  compounds

                carbon disulfide

                cyanides

                diazinon  and other pesticides

                fluorides

                hydrocyannic acid

                hydrofluoric acid

                hexavalent chromium  compounds

                mercury and  mercury  c onpound.-

                nitrobenzene

                nitrophenol
All of the chemicals listed  as hazardous  for  c-ep-well dis-
posal have very high human and ecological  hazard ratings in
the Booz-Allen reports1.  Long storage  tiir.o  is  necessary for
all of the listed organic chemicals,  They < ;.ther do not de-
grade or have a long persistence  time and  wov.ld,  t.utrefur^,
pose a long-term potential hazard tr underground v/a^er sup-
plies.  The actual persistence time is  not. generally avail-
able except for a few rough  estimates f.or  a  i'.-jv -••e-st icicle
compounds.  Some of the pesticides v/itii kaowr. loi;g persis-
tence time are:  ODD, DDT, Lindane and  the P .^.ycalorocyclo-
dienes.  Dinitrocresol is one of  the insr-cli cidee for which
no persistence data is available,  Chi ordano,  the organo-
phosphorus insecticides and  those  listed above  are among
those not recommended for deep-welJ disposal  by the National
Working Group on Insecticides2.

-------
  ;e inorganic compounds may react to form less toxic
Chemicals, but the toxic element or radical remains and
may be converted back to the more toxic form, as in the
case of hydrogen cyanide being converted to a salt, and
-hen upon acidification being converted back to hydrogen
cyanide.  Arsenic and fluoride are lethal to all forms of
life including plants.  Cadmium and mercury are toxic to
aquatic life.  Mercury and organic mercury compounds may
be converted by anaerobic microorganisms to the more toxic
methyl mercury.

Detailed descriptions of the many chemicals being injected
into deep-wells including the hazardous group identified
in this section are shown in Section XI, Appendix C, Waste
Characterization Profile Reports.

Of the 383 wells permitted, 209 were operating at the time
the data were collected for this report.  There were 53 of
these operating wells injecting one or more of the chemicals
teemed hazardous for deep-well disposal.  Table 2 identifies
 he wells and the hazardous wastes being injected into them.
.'able 3 is a tabularized assessment of the operating deep-
wells.  Both tables are found at the end of this section.

The success of injecting less hazardous or relatively innoc-
uous chemicals into deep-wells is dependent upon the forma-
tion, the fluids in the formation and the other chemicals in
the waste streams.  Because waste streams are a mixture of
different chemicals, their activity will be affected by all
the chemicals in the stream.  If acidic waste is not neutra-
lized before injection and is not injected into a. zone con-
taining sufficient carbonate to dissipate the acid, it may
be transported out of the injection zone and into a zone
containing usable mineral resources, unless the host zone
is sealed above and below by beds impervious to acid.  Other
chemicals may react to form plugging materials which will
damage the formation and prevent migration of waste away
from the well bore.  Some of the reactions which can cause
plugging of the formation are listed in the chemical aspects
subsection.  Each waste stream should be evaluated to deter-
  Lne whether or not there is a better or safer method of
xisposal.  If possible, some of the most hazardous chemicals
and solids should be removed before injection if their re-
  jval and disposal can be done safely.

-------
There have been cases reported of failures of systems to
contain the injected waste ir. ,    selected reservoir.  These
failures can usually be avoided by proper evaluation of the
waste, the formation, the liuids and the proper engineering
of the well.  Even when ail precautions have been taken to
ensure proper selection of sites and well constructed sys-
tems, hazards will still exist from accidents and unpredic-
table occurrences.

It is difficult to assess what impact the 13 chemicals or
their compounds identified as hazardous for deep-well in-
jection may have upon the environment.  In their pure form
and in high concentrations, the effect can be devastating.
However, in low concentrations, mixed with other wastes and
introduced into an underground environment of varying min-
eralogy and water chemistry, at highly varied pressures and
temperatures, the reactions and effects upon the environment
are unknown.  The intraformational reaction shown in Table 3
is the initial stage in developing a reaction matrix for
various waste streams that are being injected into subsur-
face reservoirs.  Developed to its maximum potential, the
reaction matrix could be a valuable tool in managing deep-
well injection of hazardous waste by predetermining the
reaction of a given mixture under almost any reservoir and
injection conditions,

Brine

Brine injected into subsurface reservoirs and escaping can
have a disasterous effect upon the flora and fauna of an
area as well as contaminating fresh water aquifers.  The
surface effects can be temporary if the situation is not
permitted to continue over an extended period.  However,
while the brine continues to escape, vegetation and aquatic
life will be killed.  Higher animals will seek fresher
water and drink the brine contaminated water only as a
last resort.

In many respects escaping brine contamination of fresh-
water aquifers will have more lasting effects than brine
escaping to the surface of the ground.  Once contaminated,
an aquifer is extremely difficult to purge, especially con-
fined aquifers.

-------
Sewage

Treated sewage is generally considered an innocuous fluid to
inject into subsurface reservoirs.  However, very little is
known about the length of time some bacteria and viruses can
remain alive and dormant outside a host,.  Therefore, sewage
injected into deep-wells should be considered a latent poten-
tial health problem if it escapes from the receiving reser-
voir .

Monitoring

Monitoring is relatively effective in some areas of deep-
well operation.  When properly applied :.t is most effective
in detecting equipment malfunction.  At a specific point a
monitor well may detect waste: passage within a reservoir,
but usually cannot confirm the escape of waste nor vertical
fluid movement.  After a waste stream is injected under-
ground, there is practically no control over what happens
to it or where it goes3.  Intelligent use of monitor wells
can often help detect adverse fluid movement and thereby
early indication of damage and need for corrective measures.
This olifers a limit to potential hazards.

The active sampling and analyses of samples from monitor
wells before, during and after the passage of a waste stream
front could help in defining the complex state of equilibrium
in natural water systems.  Obviously, the state of equilib-
rium is an abstraction; natural waters are dynamic systems
of variable mass on energy inputs and outputs.  Hazards
whether natural or created can be better handled as the
knowledge of this area of the environment is expanded.

The inherent weakness of monitoring systems now in use is
that the detection of problems and trouble in the systems
is retrospective.  To be fully effective, monitoring methods
and techniques must be developed to identify the type and
source of potential problems.

Legislation

The regulation of deep-well injection varies greatly between
states in form, substance and administration.  States with

-------
the largest number of deep-well installations usually have
the most strict and comprehensive regulations governing
the operation of the systems, but there are exceptions,
e.g., Colorado.  The lack of uniformity in permitting and
operating requirements between states is one weakness that
should be resolved to help develop good consistent manage-
ment and control practices.  This will give a consistency
of data from the deep-wells operating throughout the country;
a necessity in assessing the effect of hazardous waste in-
jections upon the environment.

Legal

The four theories of tort law most likely to be applied in
case of harm from deep-well injection of waste into subsur-
face reservoirs are:  trespass, negligence , nuisance, and
strict liability.  The plaintiff's remedies are injunction
and damages.  The rule and remedy chosen by the plaintiff
will be that most suitable to his case, easiest to prove
and most likely to be sustained by the local court.
Trelease1* indicates that the actor will have few defenses
other than to attack the theory of the plaintiff for lack
of an element in his case.

The new trend in law is toward "conditional fault" which
will allow desirable conduct even though it has the possi-
bility of harm.  However, the actor will be required to
pay if harm occurs.1*

It is not certain what the trend of the legal aspects of
deep-well injection will be as no critical challenges have
been made.

CONCLUSIONS

 1.   Sufficient geologic data are available to prepare com-
     prehensive feasibility studies covering all geologic
     aspects except salaquifer hydrology.

 2.   Detailed information on the salaquifers throughout
     the U. S.  is meager except in some localized areas
     where  there has been extensive oil well drilling or
     subsurface brines have been exploited for their min-
     eral content.

-------
3.   Careful consideration should be given to heavy brines
    to establish their mineral content for future use,  e.g.,
    iodine, bromine,  before using the same reservoir to
    inject waste.

4.   Brackish water up to 10 000 ppm TDS should be consi-
    dered a potential resource and the long range effects
    considered before injecting any type waste into a
    reservoir containing less than 10 000 ppm TDS.

5.   Adequate engineering data for design and completion of
    deep-well systems are available throughout the U. S.

6.   The concensus  of  the personnel in industries using
    deep-well injection systems, and those contractors
    involved in the design and construction of the systems
    is that there  has been adequate research related to
    deep-wells.  They believe that the methods and tech-
    niques proven  in  water well drilling and completion,
    and oil well drilling and completion can be applied
    to deep-well systems safely, successfully, and can
    be economically feasible.  Deep-well drilling and
    completion praictices have followed this conclusion
    which also is  supported by interviews, and the ab-
    sence of privately funded research projects related
    to deep-well injection.

7.   Deep-well injection systems for nearly all types of
    nonhazardous and  hazardous industrial waste are a
    safe method of handling the waste if the systems
    are properly located, designed, operated, managed
    and regulated.  Tentatively excluded as being safe
    for deep-well  injection if containment is questionable
    are 13 chemicals  and their related compounds identi-
    fied in the Assessment section.

8.   The planning and operation of a deep-well system is a
    multi-disciplinary effort involving geological, engin-
    eering, chemical, biological and legal expertise; none
    of which should be ignored.

9.   Almost all deep-well operational failure can be attri-
    buted to failure  to make use of available geologic  in-
    formation, ignoring these data when presented in a
                             10

-------
     feasibility report, or failure to follow proven
     engineering design and completion practices.

10.  Weaknesses appear  in limited areas in chemistry,
     microbiology, engineering, and geology in relation
     to deep-well injection.

11.  The effects of escaping waste, or products of waste
     degradation of ground-water quality and aquatic life
     in surface waters  is essentially unknown.

12.  Reactions between waste, formation water, and forma-
     tion minerals and the persistence period of compounds
     under varying conditions is not well understood.  A
     better understanding of these reactions is essential
     if a good assessment of the overall effect of deep-
     well injection can be made.

13.  Microbial degradation of some wastes in the receiving
     aquifer may be accomplished under controlled condi-
     tions.

14.  The injected waste streams containing compounds with
     high humar and ecological hazard ratings, and those
     whose persistence period and degradability pattern
     is little understood should be carefully monitored.
     Until these characteristics are better known alter-
     nate methods of disposal should be investigated in
     case any deep-well system is determined to be in-
     adequate to handle safely any of the substances
     identifier as hazardous for injection.

15.  Brine entering aquifers containing potable water
     may destroy their usefulness.  Brine leakage to the
     surface may destroy flora and fresh water aquatic
     life.

16.  Sewage injected into the subsurface should be con-
     sidered a latent health hazard until more is learned
     about the length of time some viruses and bacteria
     may remain alive and dormant outside a host.
                            11

-------
17.   Waste stream data on the inventories range from a very
     small number showing a fair amount of detail to the
     great majority with the waste stream listed in general
     or vague terms or not listed at all.  Much of this in-
     formation is considered proprietary information by
     individual companies and they will not release it.
     Many state regulatory agencies respect the companies
     regard for security on the analyses of the waste stream
     and will not release the information.  This information
     is an essential factor in making an assessment of a
     deep-well installation.

18.   Monitoring, in its present form, although adequate in
     detecting waste passage and equipment malfunction is
     ineffective for continuous tracking of waste movement
     within a reservoir, waste escape from a reservoir, or
     vertical movement of fluid.

19.   Reservoir modeling in its present state-of-the-art is
     more a recording of historic data rather than a useful
     predictive tool.  When a high degree of confidence in
     the predictive accuracy of the model can be developed
     to coincide with the early operating life of the well,
     it may develop into a useful tool for operating,, man-
     aigement, and control of deep-well systems.

20.   Too many persons involved in drafting regulations,
     permitting, and enforcing regulations relating to
     deep-well injection lack sufficient knowledge of
     well completions and the subsurface environment to
     qualify them for such decision making positions.

21.   Most state regulations or policies have been adequate
     in the past.  However, the policies and regulatory pro-
     cedures used by the states are highly variable.  Inas-
     much as no general acceptance of deep-well injection
     as an environmentally sound procedure exists between
     states, between regulatory agencies, or between per-
     sonnel within the same regulatory agency a consistency
     in approach should be adopted.  Administrator's Deci-
     sion Statement No. 5 and its recommended required eval-
     uation data should serve as a guideline toward this end,
                             12

-------
     Local operating limitations or completion  requirements
     exceeding the general rule must be determined  for  each
     geomorphic province within a state or  region as  each
     province will have unique problems.

22.  The well inventory is incomplete un much of the  phys-
     ical well data.  Generalized location  data make  well
     plotting and identification difficult-.  Both, types
     of data are essential to make vaii^ cuirj.'ent;.-.

23.  The state-of-the-art of deep-well irv>eef un may  K>
     adequately summarized by about ten selected papers
     from the mass of literature wr.ittc.ri about  .it Uvas
     far.

24.  There has been much unnecessary re-dun-laii ;•> ir.  c-search
     projects relating to deep-well i :• -;ecl j.on ,  ana  very
     little integration of these projects into  an overall
     scheme with a goal of management ^nu ;ontroi oi  the
     injection systems and the injected Wc.st.es.

25.  Much data relating to individual d^ep-well systems
     is not included in some state files or has not been
     delivered to the regulator/ agency.

26.  Many operational problems related *.x deep-well sys-
     tems are neither discovered by reaulittery  and en-
     forcement agencies nor reported by operarors.  This
     probably relates more to the wide variation in regu-
     lations on reporting rather than de]iberate with-
     holding of information.

RECOMMENDATIONS

 1.  Research of hazardous waste reaction wich  formation
     water and minerals under varying temperatures and
     pressures.  Much of this information is now lacking
     but is essential in making a valid assessment of
     deep-well injection systems.  Some initial studies
     have been made in this area of investigation by  the
     Natural Resources Center of The University of Alabama

 2.  Studies to identify persistence and degradation  times
     for hazardous waste under varying reservoir conditions.
                             13

-------
This is an area in which much information is needed
and is essential in objectively assessing deep-well
injection systems.

Studies on the reactions of waste streams from various
industrial processes when mixed with those of other
processes.  This is of particular importance when two
streams are injected into a common well or when two
streams derived from different processes are being in-
jected into a common host reservoir in close proximity
to each other.

Studies to investigate the microbiological degradation
of hazardous waste.  This approach to the possible
rapid degradation or neutralization of hazardous waste
may alleviate many of the handling and disposal prob-
lems presently encountered.

Research to develop predictive or progressive moni-
toring methods.  A breakthrough in this area will do
much to answer many of the questions about fluid move-
ment and reservoir integrity.  It will be a very effec-
tive tool for management of subsurface waste injection.

A reaction matrix should be developed on the wastes now
being injected.  The initial stage of this was started
with the intraformational reaction section of Table 3
of this report.  The development of this matrix would
riot be definitive inasmuch as there are still many un-
known factors that would necessairily be introduced in
developing the matrix.  Nevertheless it would establish
what many waste salaquifer reactions would be and an
assessment as to the environmental effect could be made
with much more reliability than at the present time.

Data from salaquifers throughout the United States
should be compiled to define areas suitable for injec-
tion and to be used in conjunction with waste and sal-
aquifer reactions.  Preliminary steps paralleling this
were begun in 1971 in a program performed by the Bureau
of Mines and sponsored by the EPA Office of Water Pro-
grams.  This original program should be reviewed and
developed.
                         14

-------
 8.  Investigate to determine the length of time some bac-
     teria or viruses might remain alive, but dormant out-
     side a host in subsurface reservoirs.

 9.  Compile the material available on the effect of saline
     water on animals for use in determining the seriousness
     of brine contamination to subsurface potable aquifers
     and surface streams.

10.  Keep the deep-well inventory updated on an annual
     schedule, and update and keep current the operating
     history of the wells.  Periodic analyses of deep-well
     systems should be stated when enough critical data have
     been collected.

11.  Standardized reporting procedures should be established
     for deep-well systems.

12.  Use and no use areas, and horizons acceptable for in-
     jection should be established and clearly identified
     for each EPA region.

13.  The injection of hazardous waste should be permitted
     to continue until there is positive evidence that it
     is having a deleterious effect upon the environment.

14.  Special vigilance should be maintained in monitoring
     the wells into which one of the 13 chemicals or its
     related compound regarded as not recommended for deep-
     well injection is being injected.  If there are any
     indications that the injected hazardous waste is es-
     caping from the host reservoir, operations should be
     suspended immediately.

15.  Alternate methods that are safe and economically
     feasible for treating hazardous wastes should be
     investigated for waste streams now being injected
     into subsurface reservoirs if:  1)  the waste is
     shown to be escaping from the host zone, 2)  the
     waste is having a detrimental effect upon the en-
     vironment.   Multiple alternative methods are shown
     in Appendix C of this report for most chemicals
     now being placed into deep wells.
                             15

-------
                              ll
                              N 00 Ol


O)
o
o
UJ
(E
<
Q.
UJ
\

o
a
Ul
a:
o
I
a.
(E
o
Z
O
UJ
o
<\J
ro"



to
z
<
_J
a.
-j
<
O5

y:
Cl
o
a
id

O
^
UJ
h-

                                             O

                                             a
                                             X

                                             aC
                                             13
                                             3
                                             CO
                                             TD
                                             a
                                              o
                                              D>
                                              O
                                              E
                                              o
                                              a>
                                              c.
                                              o
                                              g
                                              L.I
                                              _g
                                              a
                                              a
                                              g>

                                              U-
16

-------
o
§
w

o
EH


§
H
EH
U
w

2
H

W
EH
s
EH
s
Q
2
H
w
s
 I
CM
W
W
Q

CM
O
H
U
U
XJ
(t)
EH
            apnjoTnbv
                                      XXXXXX
                                            CO
                                      CN)      ^     CM
                                       «. CM CM  CN   •• CN
                                       1   1   1   1    1
                                       I   1   1   1   I   I
                                             !/)  (1)
                                             4J  M  T!
                                      4-1     4-1 -H  C
                                      3     OJ ^  n3
                                      O     03  03  i-H
                                      o     u
                                      OSS2«>     W
                                                                     XXXI
                                                                                  X
                                                                      II      II
                                                                         I       II
                                                                      II       I
                                                                      II       I  <
                                                                   >i
                                                                   0)
                                                                  01
                                                                  2
a)
2
             B
                                                                                              X        XX
                                                                                               II      D(D
                                                                                               II      II
                                                                                               ll      I  rij
                                                                                                  I       1  <
                                                                                              22     2 rt!
                                                                                                     flj

                                                                                                     C
                                                     17

-------
H
O
EH

W


1
W

o
EH
EH
U
W
W
EH
W
EH
W

Q
2
H
 I
ft
W
W
D
 ffl

 EH
 ft
 K

 U
T3
 0>

 C
•H
-P

 o
 u
w
AS
fd
$
bUT^H
OTuisiag
o^nosan
leaauxw
suad oq.
V jaq.EM
JJ UfBW
n-[DTnbv
q.enbapv
Tnbp-[BS
4Bnbap\f
qu-[TPAV
OAJtasan
Areas



XXX
rH (N rx)
(/]
1 0) 1
in
0) 1 1
i i i
i i i
^
H U
H ^ •
H T! Q
0)
"^ M C
0 C 0
H -H (d -P
O -P -H tP
W C C C
3 O -H -H
ft H ctf
W > 3



XI 1 X 1
X PL, X
(N (N CM
- rH 0
rH rH rH
W
U) Ifi M 0) W
U) g 0 g - g -
OJ 1 O O O O O O
n rH rH un rH in
1 ft, < \ <
rij fi
I < < 2 1-1
a- . 1 s
C
-H 2
Cn O
M H
-H (J nj
0) ft rH
3 W sC



1
rH
CD
W

-------
g
H
O
EH
2
2

§
2
W

O
EH



§
H

U
w

2
H

W
EH
03
EH
W


Q
2
M
w
w
Q

fa
O

X
EH
H
             O -j. UIS '[ O S
                   op

   sjajrnby joptM

        usez.i UTPK
fa
X ! X
X
 <1)
                                    sop-   go
                                   O O O O O O
                                   c o in o m o
                                      i— 1
                                           in
g  o
o  o
o  o
01  i-H
O  O
un  o
rH  ID
&  o
o  o
o  o
M  rH
g  o
o  o
o  o
M  rH

A
o
o
                                                                                           V
                                                                   2
p.
fa
u
u
<;
                                    2
                                                             rtl
                                                                        <
                                                                                        2  <
•r-jl
4->!

§i
ol
 v\
,~ll
•ai
EH!

U)

M
2
O
M
M)
S

f'-C
q_(
M
13
0)
ŁJ
C
•H
4J
O
O
^—i-



>i
X
o
4J ,CJ
C ff
0)
X
ft
ft
•H
CO
W
-H
O ft w ft
H O CO U
-H
^
(C
rH
O
^
«J
o
^
-p ft
M U
o
2
0!
C
•H
rH
0
^
ttJ
U

rŁ -M Łi(
rij 13 O
b
w

(P
0)
to
0)
rj fj p.
< C U
<1J
E-t
                                                                                        ff. <,
                                             19

-------
w
s
M
O

s

(1
s
EH
2
W
s
r3
O
a
H
p>
s
H

o
o
H
EH
U
W
2

W
EH
W
<
H

EH
W
D
Q
2
H
I-?
W

Pi
w
w
Q
O
>H
EH
H
H

EH
P.
e
u
<

•5
a
4-
G
o
0



	
a

c
(t
B









W
r^
J-|
nj
g

CM








fSlIT"! "P"VT
. 4 a


NST>T
-1 , a.
OTUIST8S


c*
TP TSTITT T
L . >ri




3q.p.;t4au3d oq.
sjajinbv JT94BM
TTQ^TJ TTT^>]T
q. d.



epnjDTnbv
aqsnbspv



a 3 JTUD'BfBS
3q.Bnbapv



'Cl T T T nT3 T T P A^7
*H ~ t. r^i^ L ,V
aTOAaesaH







w
fd
a






o
0 0
-P O
^
t3 O
C1J rH
•P 0)
•H M-J ^i
goo
•H g
rH 0]
rH M
G 0) O
O MH
•H -r( CO
-P 3 a
U D1 EH
a) 
>H >l >H >H >H




-P
-- G
^ ^ OJ
g - g - go p g
OO OO O O 1 End)
in o in o o o in
rH m rH m OT rH (C
V V A


<
<; «; 0 i j



f< <;
< < < J3 tJ




FŁ rf
< < < 2 J




^>

2
O "3
H in G -P
(J -rl (t) rfl O
H O C cn w G in
KG  in
•H ^
g G
•H (C
rH W

C G
0 0

P -H
o M
(U
•r-i
n -P
H S

[T! [ij
1 !
X X


(N
rH
rH

in in
Q) 0)
t>H ^H





.- ^
0 0 0 0 EH
in o m o
rH in H in
V V


«;
< < r^



^
e( rtj i-q




^
< rt! ^







G
•H
W
G
0
O Ł U U
-H < H W
,G -H
O S







































_P
G
0)
a)
in
td































20

-------
S
w
S
S
o
EH


§
H
EH
U
W
g
S
EH
CO

Q
2
Oi
W
W
Q
EH
Pi
W
U
U
 0)

 C
•H
-P
 C
 O
 o
 (d
EH

en
^
^_j
rfl
g
0)
tf







FiTTTT "PM


•T.*3 . O,
DTUISTaS
saoanosan
T^au-rw

xiaTia^r m
•4 uc*d ^-i
nbw TSIPAA
V -f eiYl
__
id • w

apnxoTnbv
aq.enbapv
ajTnbBfes
aq-^nbapv
-[TqB-[TPAV

in
(0
d)
sj


01 U)
-P C
C: -H
-H U!
H >H * X X
-P CJ
[-< 	 I
^^ ^~1 ^~v 1 1
_ d) •. ,-x ^-^ , — . n
goog go S~ Ł"" Ł" ^
OOEndJ ,OO OOOOOO-H
oo w oo moLnoinoSH
^d m ^ Cl H!Łl.rH!Ł!.rHlŁ!.^
A A V V V
i=C KC < rtj
rt! i4 <; &. 2 tJ ^
rf < -< a; -j O 0) ^
W Si M1 2 0














fa fa O
1 1 1
XX X
CM rH
i-H -
rH O
M W M
OJ (U li)
>H >H >H

^^ — ,
**-. * — "
g - E - go
o o o o o o
m o m o o o
r-J LI H in ro H
V V
M < SC
r-3 
-------
§
H
O
IS
H
O

H


W
§
H
EH
U
W
13
w
EH
W
D
Q
2
H
W

"l

w
w
Q
 EH
 CU
U
U
 C
•rH
-P
 C
 0
 U
                        IfSTH
                                                    fci

                                                    X
                         ft

                         X
                                                    W
                                                    Q)
                                                                                     X
                                                                                     CN
                                     W
                                     0)
   O  O
   in  o
   rH  in
Bo
in  o
H  m
o  o
IT)  O
rH  in
                                                13  w
                                                0)  c
                                                -p  0
                                                •rH  -rH
                                                JQ  -P
                                                •H  (0
                                                .C  H
                                                O  3
                                                M  tn
                                                ft 0)


                                                O  D
                                                •rl  -P
                                                -P  «j
                                                o  -P
                                                0)  CO

                                                C  ^i
                                                H  ,Q
                                                                                                 X
                       W
                       0)
                                                                                                     -P

                                                                                                     i
                                                                                                     0)
                                                                                                     w
                                                                                                     (0
                                  CM

                                  X
                                             CM

                                             X
                       W
                       0)
                                                                                                                                  W

                                                                                                                                  0)
 e  o
o  o
o  o
m  rH
o  o
in  o
H  in
                                          T3
                                          (U

                                          |

                                          -P

                                          O
                                          U
U4
ni  a
X  tf

M
H
0
H
O
§
<

CO



-•H
^4
S o
m u tn ft wo
S H CO W H
0 f^J >r^
H W S




(C
rX
w
SH ft
A 0
OJ
&
H
H
>
O
H
C5
§
<

W




0

(0
O ft
rH t9
O
O
                                                                22

-------
H
O
3
<
EH
2
W
a
2
o
PH
H
Ł>
2
W

O
o
H

(J
w
2
H
§
<


CO
D
Q
2
H
^
|
cL
w
H
Q
Cn
O
H
J

8
u
.
0)
c
~4J
c
0
u
^-^r


r— {
0)
i-H
•a
E-i



0)
r^
M
g
CJ
Pi








Ł.
DUT3.1?Ł{


VSTH
OTUISTag

s aD-zinosajj
•[•ejtaujK




sjajtnbv J83ŁM
qsajj; UTBW



,.
apniOTntDV
a^en 9pv

_
aq.enbapv

Aq.TTi:qBTtBAy
'^TOAaasaH







w
fd
OJ
in
rt!




I
0) in
4-> C
C -H
•H W
Cn ,Q
c
-H 0)

3 (XS
i-l 4->
U C
X O
a g


X




i — i
w
Q)




^
g b
0 O
0 0
ro i — l




2



g


2


HH
H
H ^.
Ł* TJ
(U
2 3
0 C
H -H O
CJ 4-1 *6
we m
So M
U 0
< *" rH Pi
cu o
w u

1
0) tn
4-) C
C -H
•H tn
(0
c
•H (U
t) C
^ n3
rH 4J
u c
X 0
W H

pr) pL)
1 1 X
X X


(N
1 — 1 1 — 1 ^
rH
tn tn tn
Q) a) a)
>< >H >H




o o o o o o
m o in o m o
V V



<. < >H JH >l >-l ><



0)
 4->
0 0

tti rd
Q Q

•H 4-J O< 4-* &4 rC ^4
OMO 0O fOPi^i CQ
O O 4-J
2 cn D
23

-------
H
O
§
EH
2
W
S
2
O
2


O
§
H
EH
U
W
W
EH
i-l

H

EH
D
2
H
W
s

w
w
Q

Cn
O
H
m

EH
ft
W
CJ
U
 s
 C
X!
 (t
                 BUT q. EH
               OTUISTSg
            saojnosan
       9q.eaq.3uad  oq
h
 I
x
                                                0>  U)
                                                •P  C
                                                C  -H
                                                •H  CO
                                                •r-4  0)
                                                T)  C
                                                O  C
                                                X  O
                                                W  g
                                                X
                                          tn
                                          0)
                                                co
                                                0)
                                          CD  O  O O
                                          m  o  o o
                                          i—i  m  n rH
H
H
>

2
O
H
O
g

ft
w


•o
0)
rj
n
•H
4->
C
0
o


                                                                  X
                                                                        X
                                                                   tn
                                                                   d)
                                                                   >H
                                                                     o  6 •
                                                                     o o o
                                                                  o o m o
                                                                  CO r-f
                                                                           in
                                                                  <     rf)
                                       ir>

                                       1^
                                       >(
                                                a;
                                                          w
                                                                                  0)
                                                                                  SH
                                                                                  0)
                                                                                  f.
                                                                                  4J
                                                                                  C  I
                                                                                  O  X
                                                                                  •H
                                                                                  4->  >i
                                                                                  U  0)
                                                                                  0)  rH
                                                                                  •n rH
                                                                                  C  (0
                                                                                  H  >
                                                                                  X
                                                                                  ro

                                                                                  CM
                                         W
                                         ai
                                                                                  o o
                                                                                  in o
                                                                                  H m
                                                                ITS
                                                                C
                                                                0
                                                                t>3
                                                               •rH
                               Ł
                                                                               •H
                                                                                C
                                                                                M
                                                                                O
                                                                               m
                                                                               •rH
                                                                               rH
                                                                                nJ
                                                                               u
                                                                                           ft

                                                                                           X
                                                                                           ro

                                                                                           CN
                                                                                                  ft

                                                                                                  X
                                                                                                 ro

                                                                                                 rsi
                                                                                           •rH
                                                        o o
                                                        m o
                                                  ft)     rH in

                                                        v
                                                                                           2
                                                                                            >  >  m
                                                                                               0)
                                                                                               s
                                                    24

-------
 W
 §
 H
W

o
EH


g
H
EH
O
H
W
H
PJ
EH
CO
D
Q
W
W
Q

fa
O
H
EH
ft
8
T3
 0)

 G
•H
-P

 0
 O
•3
EH
to
0)
tf
BuT,8a
OTUIST9S
ojnosgH

v ^CS^BM
JJ UTBW
^enbgpv
Tnbe-[es
q.pnbspv
cfexT'6-^

Areas


ft ft
XXI 1 X X X
X X

n CN «• • » CM -
iH rH H tN
to w tn W co
a) a) a) a) 
0) d) d)
O O -H O O O O -iH -HO
LOOM inomo^ MLD
V V V V
3 3 3 3 3 33
X
12 C
O 0
H .p
W G C
MOO -H
rG SH -H (71 ^1 -H J3 -H
rti T5CQ CJOCO PQ CJWOCO
ft T3 M fl
WHO S
                                                                                            •o
                                                                                            +J

                                                                                            01
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            G
                                                                                            w
                                                                                            it!
                                                         25

-------
                 u
                 H
                 s  w
                 co  co
                 H  H
                 W  «
                 CO
              0)
              c
              o
       o
       c
       •H
                            QJ
                           4-1
                            (0
                            >H
                            0)
 r<
 O
•n
 (0
s
                 U
                 H
                 ffi
                 O  CD

                 O  K
                 W
                 CD
 OJ
H
X!
 <0
EH
                               tn
                               G
                               •H
                               tO
              tO

              U)
              tO
              O
             U
             u

G w
ftf T^
-H C
.G fO
U rH
(0 X!
i — i t7»
(0 -H
PI 33
PI
<]

pj
tO
rH
SH (0
O ri
-H 4J
>H G
0) (U
4-> U
G
H
in
G
•H
tO
rH
CM

4-!
(0
0)
!H
CD
ains
4J
C
0
0
S

Ł*i
y
O
O
OH
(0
QJ
10
rH
CM

0

(0
j_)
O
rH
0
u
0)
tO
4J
c
o
(0 g
•H >H
Łj (D
§4J
G
rH H
0
U
QJ
tn
G
(0
PH

*X3
C
tO

c
-H
W
tO
CQ

G
(0

U
-H rH
G rH
(0 O
O 4->
rH 
                               U
                                         CD
                                                •H
                                                U
                                      CQ
(0
>
 0)
 W
ID

 CD
"d
 o
u
                               0)
EH
H
J
H
CO
rij
EH
CM
w
CJ
U
tO
4J
Pi
0)
u
o
(0
G


II
X





H

   EH
Dn H

H (4

O H
W  i-l
CO  H
4-1
•H
rH

•H


 tO
                                <0
                                          QJ
                                         •H
                                          ITS
                                                •H
                                                 (0
                                               26

-------
         3 -H X
         0- X 0)
         HOP
27

-------
                                                                                                      x *  x x
  SJO4 I UOK  1G_T4G
                                         X  f- X X  X X
                                                                                                      x  x  x x
   si irfM -loq iuow
                                                                53 X    X X i?.   X  X  'Ł,
uifid  000'01
        opn
                                         x  r^ x  i
                                                                                X  X





                                                                                x  x
                                                  28

-------
                 OTUIST3S
                                                                                    ,_t ^ ,-f  -I -H ,
U
g
              1E3N  Sfl3M

               pauopueqv
       uidd 000'01
                                                                               X    XX   XX
                                                             X X X  X ?•• X
                                    xxxxxxxxxx


                                           X      XXX
                                                                                          XXXXX    X   XX
                                    Z Z 2 Z Z Z
                                                             I  I  I   I  I  I
                                                                                   SSESSEEE,
                                                         29

-------
                                             U


                                           H O
     <                   <
     o                   o
H H  M     Ł-*             H
<

3
3
             UT S"[EJ9UTW
               pauopupqv
       uidd 000 '01  -zspun
                                                             X X X X  X
                                                               X X  X  o-' ^* X X f1- t\- X  X  X X X X  X X O-
                                                               X X




                                                             XXX
                                    O O
                                                               I   I  I  I  I   I  I  I  I   I  I  I  I   I
                                                          30

-------
u

&
        pauopupqv
indd  000'01
        9DE3.zaq.ui
     •3119101 3 jnsuj
         qoeojddv
                                                    « co


                                                    o ai co
                                                    o >
                                                    co o A
                                                           *4-

                                                    ^ Ł X "
                                                                   01
                                                                         T3
                                                                         H

                                                                         C
                                                                                                   a
                                                                                                   a*
                                                                                                      t; c    c
                                                                                                      o o 4-1  o
                                                                                                      H •-> O  N
                                                                                              CCOC
                               xxxxxxxxxxx
                                                               XXXXX
                                                                                XXXXXXX
                                      55555555533
                                                                                        • r- r^ r- r-
                                                               35555   555555355
                                                    31

-------
aui [ES-L{s
   
-------
10
6uTwi
5{STH OTUISTaS


STT3M -J03TUOW
psuopueqy
uidd 000 'OT Jspun
auTTes-qsaaj
,«.ŁŁŁ
"[EOT^TJO ipeo;tddv
c
o
0> S-t
o .»,„
rH 03
C C SEO
0 D
-H
H 9"[C{EJtOAB JUfl
O
H
C
ti
C rH
O 0)
H 5
tr
0)
4J 4J
W -H -H
rH rH U • O
rH rH -H &, -H
0) Q> X U X
? S O 0
0> 0) 0) 0>
O^ CP -H Łs O -H
33 C 0 O C
nj tO U 0) C U
>1 0) >1  -rl 01
•rt J^ -H <4H C 
-------
w
EH


1
                  OTU1STBS
       ea.iV
                pauopu^qv
       uidd 000 '01 ^spufl
                                                 V4    O
                                                 0)  C
                                                 -P  O  *J
                                                 rt -H  U
                                                 3 -P  O
                                                    0)  E

                                                 tn  Q* rJ
O. 0)
0 C
0 ^
z: m
0) OJ
c c
SM M
ffl OQ
0> 4)
C C
>H ^
m m
(U
c
n
en
s
^
<11 0)
c c
M U
03 CO
(U
C
M
m
c
x^
c c
M h
C C
m n
c
^
c c
U 1H
                                     OOOO-HO      OOOO
                                          X  X X X      XX   X
                                     r- X      X o-      X (^ X X
                                                                           XXXXXXX    XXX    XX
                                          X  X X X      XX   X
                                                                           X      X  X X X
                                        X  X  X X
                                                                                            XXXX    X    XXXXXXX
                                      0000

                                      till
                                      XXXX
                                                           34

-------
pauopupqv
                                 35

-------
        G
    -P  -H
     d< -P
 M   a>  m
 O   O  04
l| ]   s^

 (U
T3   03  AS
 O   C  03
                 0)   O   U
                -P  U  -H
                -P
                 (U
        O
        U

        03
    C*  ty^


G  O  to
Q)  G  g
03 AJ  (1)
0)      &
M -P
Oj  O  O
    G  -P
QJ
                     O

                     O
                                 I    I    I

                                X  IS  *
                                        H
                                         CU
                                                                    4-)
                                                                    -H
                                                                    X!
                                                                    rC
                                                                    -P
                                                                    CU
                                                                    0)
                                                                    U
                                                                 Q)  O
            O
            -P
            O
            id
tO  T3  tO  03
•P  0)  C  -H
a -p  -H  4-1

O  g  S-l  03
O  -H  tO  G
<  i-H1  a  D
 I

<:
                                                                     I
                                        I!

                                        g  D
 M   O
 O   (0

 0)

Xi   O
 tO  -H
 G   | ^
 O   tO

_jj   J^l
 03   O
 (U  4H

a -H

 i

r^
 0)
 CD
 03
ID

 (U
T3
 O
O
O
4->

'O
(-1
(0
^3
Ł
(0
4->
01
x?

T3

(0
4J
CO
_p
C
Q)
^j
H
1
03
0)
4J
m
4J
CO

G
0
•H
4-)
(0
•H
[>
0)
Ł
(0

^-1
a)
4->
4->
(U
rH

. — .
OJ
^^







appearing

OJ
0
G
Q)
0
cr
Q)
03
X)

T3
Q)
-H
m
•H
4J
G
Q)
T)
H
1

03
rH
,-H
OJ
15
H
^
•H
T3
G
0)
d.

<"
s*-'
^
!H
O
4J
G

(0
SH
(U
r^
o
a

i

CN



J-|
O
•r-i
(0
gj

1

ro




























03
S-!
(0
g
0)
^H

03
d)
4->
03
tO
[2

03
3
O
r^J
V-|
tO
N
tO
ffi

M
O

O
•H
X
o
EH
1


EH


03
OJ
r|
U
fO
O
M
CU
p.
<1

G

O
tO
M
Pn
1

PH
(H
fa

                                                        36

-------
                       SECTION I

                    REFERENCES CITED
1.  Booz-Allen Applied Research, Inc., Hazardous Waste
    Materials:  Hazardous Effects and Disposal Methods,
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Vol. 1, 407 pp,
    1973.

2.  Ottinger, R. S., et al, National Disposal Site Candidate
    Waste Stream Constituent Prof"! le Reports, Pesticides and
    Cyanide Compounds, Recommended Methods of Reduction,
    Neutralization, Recovery or Disposal of Hazardous Waste,
    U. S. Environmental Protection~Aqency7~E:PA-670/2/73-053
    -e, Vol. 5, 143 pp, 1973.

3.  Ottinger, R. S., et al, Disposal Process Descriptions
    Ultimate Disposal, Incineration, and Prciysis Processes,
    Recommended Methods of Reductip^Neutralization, Re-
    covery or Disposal of HazardousWa.sle_, LJ. S. Environ-
    mental Protection Agency, EPA-670/2,/73 -053r- , Vol. 3,
    248 pp, 1973.

4.  Trelease, F. J., Liability for Harm from Underground
    Waste Disposal, Amer. Ass. Petrol. C-eol. Mem. 13,
    pp 369-375, 1972.

-------
                        SECTION II

                       INTRODUCTION
Injecting liquid industrial waste into underground formations
is often an economical, attractive, but not necessarily prac-
tical or safe means for disposing of these wastes.  Waste
management and the control of water and air pollution are
  ^coming increasingly difficult and more complex.  The unpre-
•-•edented population and industrial expansion and concentra-
  on, the revolutionary new technologies, and changing land
  -:;s and practices have presented enormous pollution prob-
  es to be solved by a relatively unprepared science.  Re-
  iarch must now be concerned with new problems caused by the
>heer mass of pollutants and by whole groups of new pollu-
^arits that are highly complex in composition, and which may
persist for extremely long periods, and possibly indefinitely
when in solution.1'2

With this formidable task of sensible and practical waste
management now presented to industry, science, and govern-
ment agencies, the strength and weaknesses of known systems
must be examined and their value to the scheme of waste man-
agement established.

PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

The purpose of this report is to make an assessment of the
adequacy of deep-well injection as a method to manage the
hazardous industrial waste in a manner that will insure pro-
tection of the environment from adverse affects.

SCOPE OF THIS REPORT

This report is to present as comprehensive an assessment of
hazardous waste management by deep-well injection as can be
permitted by the controlling factors of time, permissible
contacts, and budget limitations.

The information base is to be established with available lit-
erature.  This information base is supplemented by personal
contacts with individuals, industry, and government agencies

                              38

-------
concerned with deep-well inject: or, and having expertise in
this field.  The report covers the geologic, engineering,
chemical, and biological asuf:cts of deep-well injection of
industrial waste.

An analysis of: the data collected from the various sources
synthesized an assessment of the environmental effects of
disposal of hazardous waste into deep-wells, and contains
recommendations for research and development and other acti-
vities required by the EPA to assess the effectiveness of
deep-well injection as an available technique for the man-
agement of hazardous waste.

Data supplemental to the assessment sections of the report
include injection well inventory, profile reports on hazard-
ous waste being injected into deep-wells, and inventory of
legislation of various states throughout the United States,
summaries of research projects, past and present, and a cross
referenced comprehensive bibliography of available litera-
ture on the subject of deep-well injection,

DEEP-WELL INJECTION

The prefix deep when applied to the phrase "deep-well injec-
tion" is often confusing.  This prefix does not refer to any
specific depth nor to the soil cover, but refers to rock for-
mations which are below and isolated from fresh water aqui-
fers.  Galley  defines the term to mean rock formation, not
soil, which lie below and are isolated from fresh water aqui-
fers so that injected liquids will not enter potential water
supplies or mineral resources either by natural means or by
any process that is induced by the injection.  Galley indi-
cates that this usage calls for permeable rock layers several
hundred meters deep, generally 900 metres (30001)  in geologic
basins confined above by thick relatively impermeable and
fracture resistant strata such as shale or salt deposits.
These criteria expressed by Galley have not always been ad-
hered to, often with undesirable results and at least tem-
porarily degrading effects upon the environment.  The mini-
mum depth of burial, the necessary thickness of confining
strata, and the minimum salinity of water in the injection
zone have not been established quantitatively, and it may
be possible to specify these constraining parameters only
for individual cases, as has been done i.n the past.
                             39

-------
In most cases the minimum depth of burial can be considered
to be that depth at which a confining saline-water-bearing
zone is present; it may range from a few hundred to several
thousand feet.  The minimum salinity of water in the injec-
tion zone is generally specified by the: regulatory agencies
in most states, and will vary from at least 1 000 mg/1 of
dissolved solids to 10 000 mg/1 total dissolved solids.

Con cep t

The concept of underground injection of liquid wastes was
developed by the oil industry early in its history, when sur-
face drainage was becoming contaminated by  oilfield brines.
The operators developed the now-common practice of injecting
salt water wastes back into the subsurface reservoirs from
which the oil and salt water originally were produced, and
also into shallower or deeper reservoirs which had the stor-
age capacity to accept the injected brine.  This practice
was not long established when it became obvious that the in-
jected brines were contaminating fresh water sands that were
being used for domestic supplies.  This disposal practice for
oilfield brines matured, and under the control of state laws
has become a standard and accepted practice.  More recently
numerous other industries have turned to deep-well injec-
tions as a possible solution for their chronic waste dis-
              245
posal problem.  '  '   About 1958, the AEC began serious con-
sideration of this method as a possible means for disposing
of certain types of radioactive waste Liquids.

The concept was developed to the degree that in 1974 in addi-
tion to over 40 000 oilfield brine disposal wells6'7'8 there
are 209 operating industrial waste disposal wells in the
United States, as well as approximately five to eight thous-
and sewage and storm water disposal wells in the states of
Oregon and Idaho.  In addition to these wells in the United
States there are an estimated 20 wells operating in Canada
and two or three wells operating in Mexico.

Philosophy

The governing philosophy of the concept of deep-well injec-
tion of industrial waste is to dispose of a maximum amount of
hard-to-treat, toxic, hazardous, or innocuous waste at a
minimum cost, with the least deleterious effect upon the en-
vironmental regime of which the well is a part.
                              40

-------
BACKGROUND OF DEEP-WELL EXPERIENCE

These historical data presented are the compilation of
inventories by Donaldson*, Warner
                                        Ives, and Eddie
for the Interstate Oil Compact Commission10'11, WAPORA12,
and the files of various state regulatory agencies.  The
tables and figures shown with these data have been up-
dated to January 1975, unless noted otherwise.

The present inventory shows at least 383 deep-well injec-
tion sites for which permits had been granted, located in
25 states.  Wells were drilled on 322 of the sites, and
209 were being used for waste injection in 1974.  Figure
2 shows the growth of operating injection wells in the
U. S. by year.  The rapid development of industrial waste
            300
            zoo
           to
           _i
           -i
           ul
            100
               51   55    60    65   70   75    80
                            YEAR
   Figure 2.   Growth of operating deep-well injection
                   systems in the United States.
                           41

-------
injection wells as indicated by Figure 2 is of concern to
the federal, state, and local governments because of the
many uncertainties related to deep-well injection which
relate directly to the degradation of the environment.

Tables 4, 5, and 6 indicate the standard industrial classi-
fication of injection wells, rock type and age of host res-
ervoirs and well completion depths, respectively.12
       Table 4.  STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION

                         OF INJECTION WELLS
                            (268 Wells)
	WELLS    PERCENTAGE

MINING (9.3%)
  10  Metal Mining                          2           .7
  12  Coal                                  1           .4
  13  Oil & Gas Extraction                 17          6.4
  14  Non-Metallic Mining                   5          1.9

MANUFACTURING  (80.6%)
  20  Food                                  6          2.2
  26  Paper                                 3          1.1
  28  Chemical & Allied Products          131         48.9
  29  Petroleum Refining                   51         19.0
  32  Stone & Concrete                      1           .4
  33  Primary Metals                       16          5.9
  34  Fabricated Metals                     3          1.1
  35  Machinery - Except Electronics        1           .4
  38  Photographies                         3          1.1

TRANSPORTATION, GAS, AND
SANITARY SERVICES  (9.8%)
  47  Transportation Service                1           .4
  49  Sanitary Service                     23          8.6
  50  Wholesale Trade - Durable             1           .4
  55  Auto Dealers & Service                1           .4

OTHE R  (.4 %)
  72  Personal Service                      1           .4
                             42

-------
         Table
                RESERVOIR PO'^K TYPE AND ACE  (269 WELLS)
 TERTIARi

 CRETACEOUS
 JURASSIC
 TRIASSIC

 PERMIAN
 PENNSYLVANIA!!
 MISSISSIPPI AN
 DEVONIAN
 SILURIAN
 ORDOVICIAN
 CAMBRIAN
 FRECAMBRIAN
TOTAL
          iJ69)
                      SAND &
                    SANDS TONiŁ
               7.4
167
                            CARBONATE  EVAPORITE  SHALE
                                OTHER
                                11
                                14
                                 2
                                 1
                                21
                                 3
                                20
                                19
 91
33.8
2
.7
1
.4
Overall the  injection of industrial liquid waste  into the
subsurface reservoirs has been acceptable.  To  this  overall
smoothly operating  scheme, there have been notable exceptions
among which  can  he  Included the Rocky Mountain  Arsenal well
at Denver, Colorado,  the Haimermill Paper Company well at
Erie, Pennsylvania,  and die Hercules Company well at Wilming-
ton, North Carolina.   Flan/ -jases, both good and bad, are dis-
cussed in the  section on case histories and in  other sections
directly related to the geologic, engineering,  chemical, or
biological aspects  of deep-well disposal.

In all cases studied, j_t was determined that major failures
of injection systems  could oe directly related  to two basic
factors.  The  first is that the geology of the  area  was not
studied thoroughly  prior to drilling the well,  or if studied
the result of  the studies were ignored or slighted in the
planning.  The second factor is that poor engineering design
was employed,  or poor well completion practices were followed,
Chemical and biological factors also have contributed to well
                               43

-------
failures, however, unlike the geologic and engineering fac-
tors, the chemical and biologic factors are often correct-
able if they are not allowed to progress too far.
        Table 6.  WELL COMPLETION DEPTHS (262 WELLS)
DEPTH
0 -
1001 -
2001 -
3001 -
4001 -
5001 -
6001 -
7001 -
8001 +
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000

NO. WELLS
20
56
33
34
39
44
18
12
3
PERCENTAGE
7.6
21.4
12.6
12.8
14.8
16.7
7.2
4.8
1.2
                              44

-------
                        SECTION II

                     REFERENCES CITED
1.   Weinberger, L.W. , General Hearings Held on Progress aria
     Programs Relating to the Abatement 5^^3^r__Po_l_lu_tJ o!" ,
     Special Subcommittee on Air and Water i-'ollution of the
     Committee on Public Works, United States Senatet 89th
     Congress, 1st Session, Pt. I, Washington, D.C.,  May
     19-21, 1965, U.S. Govt. Printing Office pp 92-112.

2.   Warner, D.L., Subsurface Disposal of Liquid Industrial
     Wastes by Deep-Well Injection, Anu^r. Assn. Petrol. Geos
     Mem. 10, pp 11-20, 1968.

3.   Galley, J.E., "Economic and Industrial Potential of
     Geologic Basins and Reservoir Strata" , S_ub surf ace Dis-
     posal in Geologic Basins--A Study of Reservoir Strata,
     Amer. Assn. Petrol. Geol. Mem. 10, pp 1-10, 1968.

4.   Donaldson, B.C., Subsurface Disposal of Industrial
     Wa.stes in the United States, U.S. Pur, Mines Inform.
     Circ. 8212, 34 pp, 1964.

5.   Warner, D.L., "Subsurface Injection of Liquid Wastes,"
     Natural Gas^ Coal, Ground Water-Exploring New Methods
     and Techniques in Resources Research-Western Resources
     Conf., 8th Colo. Sch. Mines, Colorado Univ. Press,
     Boulder, Colo., pp 107-125, 1967.

6.   Ottinger, R.S., et al, Disposal Process Descriptions -
     Ultimate Disposal, Incineration and Pyroiysis Process,
     Recommended Methods of Reduction, Neutralization, Re-
     covery or Disposal of Hazardous Waste, Vol. 3, pp 1-16,
     1973.

7.   Reeder, L.R., Underground Waste Disposal Systems, Geol.
     Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 4, No. 4,
     p 290, Feb. 1972.
                             45

-------
is.    Reeder,  L.R. ,  Reservoir Aspects  of  Deep-Well Disposal,
     Amer.  Assn.  Petrol.  Geol.  Mid Continent Regional Mtg.
     (Tulsa,  Oct.  3-5,  1973)  Program,  pp 26-27,  1973  (Abstr.
     only).

9.    Warner,  D.L.,  and  D.H.  Orcutt, Industrial Wastewater -
     Injection Wells in United States  -  Status of Use and
     Regulating,  1973,  2nd Int. AAPG - USGS - IAHS Under-
     ground Waste Manage.  &  Artificial Recharge  Symp.  (New
     Orleans, Sept.  26-30, 1973)  Preprints, Vol.  2, pp 687-
     697, 1973.

10.   Ives,  R.E.,  and G.E.  Eddy, Subsurface Disposal of Indus-
     trial  Wastes,  Interstate Oil Compact Comm.  Study, Okla-
     homa City, 109  pp. 1968.

11.   Ives,  R.E.,  and G.E.  Eddy, Subsurface Disposal of Indus-
     trial  Wastes,  (Unnumbered Publ.), Interstate Oil Com-
     pact Comm.,  Oklahoma City, 61 pp, First Suppl.,  Jan.1970.

12.   WAPORA,  Inc.   Compilation of Industrial and Municipal
     Injection Wells in the United States, EPA - 520/9-74-020,
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, B.C.,
     1350 pp, 1974.
                              46

-------
                        SECTION III

    DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF HAZARDOUS INDUSTRIAL WASTES
The ultimate and highly desirable end of industrial waste
would be recycling or conversion of the waste into some
usable product.  However, at the present time there are
large volumes of waste which are either indestructible or
cannot be converted economically.  Wastes of these types
are the ones that should be considered prime material for
controlling deep-well injection and storage, if the deep-
well method is proved safe and acceptable to receive them.

GEOLOGIC ASPECTS

The general geologic characteristics that establish the
suitability of areas for deep-well injection can be out-
lined.  More detailed studies are necessary to show depth,
distribution and physical characteristics of specific po-
tential injection zones within the areas considered gener-
ally suitable.  Suitable disposal zones are those with
proper injectivity and storage capacity characteristics.
Experience in the oil industry has shown, that nearly all
types of rocks may, under favorable circumstances, have
sufficient porosity and permeability to yield or accept
large amounts of fluid.  Sedimentary rocks, especially
those deposited in a marine environment, are the most
likely to have the geologic characteristics suitable for
waste injection wells.  Detailed geologic and engineering
studies of local areas having the characteristics required
for these potential injection zones are necessary before
a recommendation can be made regarding site suitability.
Figure 3 indicates the general areal suitability for deep-
well injection of industrial waste in the United States.
When interpreting this figure it must be realized that it
outlines the defined areas only in the broadest sense.
Those areas designated as unfavorable or having limited
or restricted use are conservative, and generally well
established.  The areas shown as favorable indicate the
probable presence of a reservoir and adequate aquiclude
and require detailed investigation for each proposed site.
                            47

-------
                                            to
                                            c
                                            o
                                                         in
                                                        TJ
                                                        C
                                                         O
                                                        C
                                                        o
                                                        o
                                                        
                                                         in
                                                    Q
                                                         0)
                                                        *^
                                                        (75
                                                    €  «
                                                        0)
                                          3 O
                                          0,-a
                                          5^   o   g
                                          EŁ   -  I
                                          §c   5-  I
                                          Ł8   Q  <
     D>
•g  c
48

-------
These areas contain many local areas unsuitable for the
injection of waste of any type.  The feasibility of injec-
ting hazardous waste into any given reservoir at any
locality must be determined by a detailed study of the
local areas.

Geologically Acceptable Areas

Warner1 indicated that the major synclinal basins are
accepted as geologically favorable sites for deep-well
injection,  and that other areas may be generally unfavor-
able because sedimentary rock cover is thin or absent.
This statement, although generally acceptable, necessarily
must be qualified because of the numerous variables which
must be weighed in considering a site for deep-well injec-
tion.

The many areas where relatively impermeable igneous and
metamorphic rocks crop out are shown in Figure 42.  These
areas generally can be eliminated from consideration for
waste injection.  Positive areas of igneous and metamorphic
rocks outside the major mountain ranges are significant
factors in  locating waste injection wells, although, they
may not be  areally extensive.  The outcrop and recharge
area of the overlying sedimentary sequence often ring
the flanks  of such features resulting in unconfined fresh
water aquifer for great distances down dip precluding the
injection of wastes into the reservoir rocks without con-
tamination .

Those areas of Figure 4 in the northwestern United States
where a thick volcanic sequence is present at the surface
generally are not acceptable as waste-injection well sites.
Although these volcanic rocks have fractures, fissures,
and intercalated gravel beds that will accept the injected
fluids, they contain fresh water, often to great depths,
which at some point probably will be in communication with
the injected fluid.

The immense and geologically complex Basin and Range pro-
vince of the southwestern United States is a series of
narrow basins and intervening structurally positive ranges.
Many of the basins might provide waste-injection sites, but
their geology is generally unknown and the cost of obtaining
                             49

-------
4
 P^r -f r/Tl
 !    !   '>(  I
           ±y   i/^Tvf\
             !    (f r ;^*     I
                 i i^ri : /--vr^l .
                     c
                     _o

                     (J
                     4)
                     'E*
                     O)
                     5
                     i
                     Q.
                     03
                     (U
                     TO
                     en
                     c

                     "o
                     O

                     0)
                     c
                     o
                     o
                     c
                     o>
                     en
                     o
                     C3»
                     O
                     O
                     0>
                     o
                     0>
                     l_
                     3
                     O)
50

-------
enough useful information to ensure safe construction of
injection wells would be extremely great.  Also, the
bounding limits of many of the basins, in all probability,
would define a reservoir with a capacity to receive only
small volumes of injected waste.

The geology of the west coast is complex and in many areas,
not too well known.  In southern California, several rela-
tively small Tertiary basins have yielded great quantities
of oil and gas.  Geologically, these basins probably could
be considered satisfactory sites for waste-injection wells.
However, the speculation on many factors, such as possible
contamination of future water supplies, contamination of
oil and gas reservoirs, and triggering of active fault
zones prevent these basins from being considered as attrac-
tive for deep-well injection of any industrial waste at
this time.  Eocene sanris in the subsurface of the Sacramento
Valley of California are being used successfully for the
injection of photographic laboratory wastes, while injec-
tion problems ar-: reported with hydrocarbon injection into
Paleocene sands :n Contra Costa  County.  Along the coast
of northern California, Oregon, and Washington there are
basins similar to those of southern California, but little
is known about fch<_: i r eco
Areas not underlain by major basins or prominent geologic
features generally may be satisfactory for waste disposal
if they have a sufficient thickness of sedimentary rocks
that contain water, and if potential disposal zones are
sealed frrm fresh -water aquifers by sufficient thicknesses
of aqulol uaes or aquitards.

Seismicity

The seismic risk of various  areas of the United States is
outlined on Figure 53.  Seismic risk should be a considera
tion in the planning of all  deep-well injection systems,
and especially those handling toxic and hazardous wastes.
Over all system design, including surface treatment plant,
casing string design, fail safe devices, and monitoring
systems should be designed and constructed corresponding
to the degree of seismic risk assigned to the site area.

-------
                                                  o
                                                  -a
                                                  <
                                                             C
                                                             o
                                                             (/>
                                                             —

                                                             E

                                                             !u
                                                             0)

                                                             >«-
                                                             O
                                                             (A
                                                             0>
                                                             0>
                                                             +-

                                                             C
                                                             0>
                                                             o
                                                             0)
                                                             o

                                                             E
                                                             o>
52

-------
Reservoir Requirements

Suitable disposal zones are those with proper  injectivity
and storage capacity characteristics.  There is  the  univer-
sal requirement that the waste be confined  to  the  disposal
formation so that commercially valuable natural  resources
including fresh water be protected.  The  ideal character-
istics for an injection reservoir which follow have  been
expressed in one form or another by most  writers on  this
subject.  These criteria were presented originally in  ap-
proximately this present form by McLean1*  and were  later
expanded by Reeder5•6 to approximately the  form  presented
in this report.  The identifying terms for  these criteria
are, for the most part, relative and elude  exact dimensions,
Preciseness is difficult in defining the  terms because of
the large number of variables associated  wjth  any  given
deep-well system.  However, once proposed operating  con-
ditions for a specific system have been established  within
a limited range, maximum or minimum mathematical limits
may be assigned to the desired reservoir  ruqu'roments.
Ideally, to have a system that will operate safely and
efficiently, the formation should possess rhe  follovinq
characteristics:

Uniformity -

Uniformity of the reservoir rock facilitator calculations
of the behavior of the injected fluid, prci^cred volumes
of fluids, injection pressures and other  ass^o^ated  oper-
ating problems.

The necessity of reservoir uniformity is  of ir. :r< rsing im-
portance as the thickness of the reservoir  -ic-cr _; ses  et-.rJ
as the volume and rate of injected fluid  increase.    Gradual
changes over a large area or a very iocu'iiea  disruption in
the homogeneity of a host reservoir usuuiVy c.u, not cause
great problems.  However, abrupt cnanges  ;n lil .Sology, and
mineralogy, leading to reduced porosity,  permeohj 1 iv.y  or
other reservoir characteristics rolateo to  -toiavje rapacity
or transmissibility can not only increase the  scope  and
magnitude of operating problems, but can  make  a'; c=nt.i..:e.
operation physically impossible.

-------
    :;ier~'oir of  large areai e/.tent  is  necessary ho take  in-
    .ed  fluids  1.1  sufficient quantity  to  make a disposal
    e-,rt  -. ;necr.dr.i-7d'_ ?.rd economic  success,

    area_ extent,  Lj_ke uni formity,  is  a  relative parameter
    indent upon  many variables, and  it  must  be determined
    each. /y'eii.   The rate and  volume c: waste to be  injected,
    length of  time lurir.c «hicn  it  is  injected, the total
    .ne  expected to be in je ;ted; whether  the reservoir  is
    ::.:iect ~r uncor fined,  a;id whether the  reservoir fluid
    . ?,ir= cas ir. solitior. are  some  of  ;he factors which
     \~:  '.T.own  Before de finite mathematical  limits can be
    ;-ed   A reservoir of infinite  -extent and of homogeneous
    ., logy woui ;i r'-c res-er.t  an  ide-ii  situation for an injec-
     ;;ne,  Iras:r.ucr. as  this  cor.ditioi is nonexistent,  the
    , dimensions  to be assigned  a  reservoir of "'large  areal
         "list be determined as the  smallest  available to
      •  ~":isf'_-  the conditions needed  for the injection  pro-
       "  the proposed :.r, ^ecticn -/elL.   However, it is advan-
     ..-:  -. • ca**-j -i reservoir larger  than  the needed  minimum
      -•-  i i"ari tece o^" tne micrc-spc-.ce  donations nade by
     . -x.-. d i.:ok  •:• empress ih i iity vhicn  is  vaJuable only  in
    \.=-r". proportions rained  ir.  larie  -volumes over  large
  „. . Ł ~: an 1 1 a 1  Th. i c fin e s s -
                     y to the voiune  cf the reservoir  avail-
^:D!Ł: for  injection,   However,  it  is  of more importance  in
: -s direct  re Lati on snip to the  rate  a.t which the  formation
-"ill cake  in]ected fiaid..  It will  vary with the  require-
ments of  each  individual system and  changes in their  re-
_;ui remencs ,   The maximum available  t; hi ex ness in an  injec-
Mon zone  should always be. an  objective in planning an
injection well if it can be obtained without adversely  af-
fecting the  other parameters to be  considered in  selecting
;he well  s L te.

  • -•' ;1 -3°ros — Y  a^r. d _•? e r me ab i 1 i cy  -

 he 33 factors  relate directly  to  available volume and to the
 .i'-= at which  find can be injected at reasonable pressure.

-------
The maximum obtainable porosity and permeability in an
injection zone is an asset anu ^sudLj-v is an aid to a
trouble free and smoothly operating injection system.

Low Pressure -

This is a desirable factor in all cases inasmuch as it
allows a greater working margin at which fluids can be
injected into a reservoir without causing fracturing.
Too high initial pressures may be a factor limiting the
intake rate and operating life of the injection well, as
well as greatly increasing the operating cost.

Salaquifer -

The minimum salinity of water in the host formation
generally will be specified by regulatory agencies in
most states, but will be at least 1000 ppm total dis-
solved solids except under unusual circumstances.  How-
ever, because of its relative freshness, ease of treat-
ment, use. in stock watering, irrigation of certain crops
and use as a protective buffer, the minimum salinity at
the point of injection into the host reservoir in most
cases should be 10 000 ppm.   This does present problems
in some regions and needs more detailed study.  Salinity
of formation water is discussed in detail in another
section.

Separatedfrom Fresh Water Horizons -

The minimum depth of burial for a confined reservoir can
be considered to be the depth at which a salaquifer is
present; it may range from a few hundred feet to several
thousand feet.   Injection should be vertically below the
level of fresh water circulation and confined vertically
by rocks that for practical purposes are impermeable to
waste liquid.

In an unconfined reservoir the depth of burial can be
considered to be the depth at which brine is encountered
in the reservoir with the freshwater zone of the reservoir
being adequately separated from the injection point by a
buffer of brine, salt, and brackish water.

-------
Adecrucitt: Overlying an\i  _,nu.erlyi.ng Acuiciudes —

Vertical confinement  of  injected ,/a.ste is important, net
only for tne protection  of  the  usable  water resources, ju:
also for the protection  of  developed, and undeveloped de-
posits of hydrocarccns and  other minerals.   The effect ~f
lateral movement  ;f waste  :n  such natv.rHi resources a_s:
muse pe considered.   rjnf ractured shr-1;.  clay,, slat:-,
anhydrite, gypsuir, salt:, marl,  bentcnite and similar Im-
permeability iithologic  types are considered rood seals
against vertical  migration  of fluids,.   Limes con'-- and io^.;
rnite may be satisfactory confining strata.   However, thosi:
recks often have  fractures  and  solution  cnar.ne is so the:_r
adequacy must be  determined in  eacn case,
potential host  zones  in  many
dreds and occasionally  thousands of feet of impermeable
strata which virtually ensures  tr.eir segreratirr.,

No Inadequately Plugged  "-Jells Near ~he Infection w'elis -

Unplugged or improperly  plugged wells  tnat penetrate the
host zone provide a means of  escape for  injected waste t3
mineral zones,  ground-water  aquifers or to tne surface.   Trie
contamination of  any  zone outside the  host rock complete 1^
defeats the concept an 3  philosophy of  under-ground wast-
injection,

In established  oil producing  areas the :onsideratior. of
unplugged or improperly  plugged wells  is probably tne rnos'-
important parameter once the  presence  of an adequate injec-
tior. horizon has  been determined.  This  is because  a  Large
percentage of wells wnen plugged have  oeen filled only
mud, and have had no  cement bridge plugs spot tad at
tarvai within tae well bore.   Mud laden  fluid will, in t_r.
tend to settle  out thereby  reducing its  ef feet", venes ~  T.S  i
plugging agent.   Ariy  pressure increases  b-cause of  injec-
tion in any zone  exposed to this mud filled we 1i sere  'ill
cause a fluid movement  toward tins area of less resistance
once the pressure of  the mud  column is equalized.  With  a
sufficient  increase  in  pressure, a s -.e idy flow up the  ~~L. <. •
doned well bore will  invade any horizon with a lower pres-
sure differential.   It  should oe noted that the formation
water is quite  often  the escaping fluid rather than  :he  in
jected waste whi.cn usually  does ri3t migrate too far from

-------
the point of injection.  The earlier the date of develop-
ment of a particular producing area the more critical the
poorly plugged well problems become when planning a deep-
well injection system in the same area.

Compatibility Between Reservoir and Injected Wastes -

The waste must be compatible with formation lithology,
and to a degree with the native fluids of the formation.
Although, in the latter case incompatible waste may be
safely injected behind a compatible buffer fluid.  In most
cases, compatibility of the injected waste with the for-
mation fluid is probably the least important of all the
criteria for safe deep-well injection, as preinjection
treatment can eliminate the problem in a large majority
of the cases.

Incompatibility between formation and injected fluids must
not, however, be ignored as early recognition and remedy
of this condition can mean the success or failure of a deep-
well system.  Incompatibility between waste fluids and for-
mation minerals is a much more critical condition, when en-
countered, and is much more difficult to combat successfully
than reaction between the fluids.

Compressibility

Both the reservoir rock and the interstitial fluid are com-
pressible to a very small degree.  It is the compression
factor that provides the space needed to inject extraneous
fluids into an otherwise full reservoir.  The waters in the
salaquifer are compressed by the injected waste liquids in
an ever expanding cylinder away from the well bore.  Since
rock and water compressibility are both of small magnitude,
the salaquifer must be of large areal extent to distribute
the pressure build-up.  If the formation is confined by
faulting, reservoir pinch-out, or permeability restriction
in the region of the disposal well, a very limited area
will be available to compress the formation rock and water,
and pressure will build up rapidly, or injection rates de-
cline to a point where the operation becomes impractical.
                            57

-------
                                        :.:-.  '• r  :w~.  cc- oe  deoendent
uton. •;:;<Ł  ;^r~3
va te::..    "i Liere
     • '""   - _ „
                           fcr water,
:r~r  :-•_•.•  .•:  r--cue . r.g che -. aiue
_r -  ..•.•,'-.-  -.no -~iec~  or producing
-;r. ' ,:  ::.t-:tr.:s per  CUDL-  metre per

 - * ,   "-,'    .:• .- tpr.-'x;, aateiy  4.o
At  .3. given
*- i  r* ^   r"1 '•-• .-*. _i~'- ~ -
i ~ c jr. = i _,e r ~.i~ :..c.  .. ;
naturaJ- gas per  •<••

             t- errecr  or gas  in
             '•*-.  c^inpressibility
             ssure and "empera-
             r -re compressibility
            :"i':a->-.r.g  3,5-.  Tr;3 of
             a;, r^l-  will have a
R ;• ck Jcmx: :re 3 s'. r ',
buried deeply

at  a ere ate r
         ;:^  .-eer.  :;:iG\vr:.  by F.rumbein
         ; r 2 e -^ f  :: c rap d c t ±. c r.  of the
         :r.-.:•-• o.i or  tve maximum
         jnti whi rn have been
          ij1^ ftea, e xh ib11  Iowe r
         :  r.^ve -:ot: been buried
Apart.  :rcn u.~  •_ _:ip a/ --_•„!"•  -r. crai.   _• /. i <.-.n jemer. ~ ,  rocss  are
also ccmpcesa -b " --.  ,   ;"-^ers -.:r.a"'  6'.^t.es  t:.atH  cr.ree  kinds of
                                                 reck :   •', I)  rock
mat r i x  c c:;;p r e s o i ;
rarnt: tttr  above  _j;
caramete: v.
      '.'"j I x  cornp ress i-) i j.i ty y,  ar.c
    :.. PIC : - s i :. .7,., ;. c /  o t e a on  p> a—
      ::..2j'Jt=  r\  "'z . ,ine  by T,haL
     ore- .;.^r-r ,   3a*..-:  cepO'rted
      9 ••, - ..:•". 1 -i •:  ' r. e t  ••:, ve r b u r de n

-------
pressure" defined as  (P*0.85P).  The factor 0.85 is intro-
duced to take into account that the internal pressure does
not wholly react against the external pressure.  The factor
is believed to be dependent upon the structure of the rock
and range from 0.75 to 1.00 with an average of 0.85.  Fatt
found that the core compressibility was a function of pres-
sure.  Within the range of data considered he did not find
a correlation with porosity.  Pore volume compressibility
of consolidated sandstones is in the order of 5 x 10~6 to
10 x 10~6 reciprocal psi.7

Critical Pressures of Confining Beds^ -

Impermeability of overlying and underlying beds is essential
so that the possibility of breakthrough from pressure of in-
jection, pressure from evolved C02, or thermal expansion does
not take place.  All operating pressures should be below the
critical pressure needed to fracture the formation.

Theoretical overburden pressure of the earth is equal to
22.6 kPa/m (1.0 psi/ft.)  of depth.  The effective overburden
pressure, that pressure required to inject fluid into a frac-
tured well, varies from 17.0 kPa - 25.1 kPa/m  (0.75 - 1.11
psi/ft.) of depth at 610m (20001), to 12.9 kPa - 19.2 kPa/m
(0.57 - 0.85 psi/ft.)  at 2438m (8000'J.11  Extremes may range
from 9.0 kPa - 33.9 kPa/m (0.4 - 1.5 psi/ft.)  of well depth.

In order to design adequate surface and pumping equipment,
and to accurately evaluate the hydrologic properties of the
disposal formation, injectivity tests should be made.
McLean1* suggests, if possible the tests should be made at
the critical input pressure, i.e., the point at which the
formation begins to fracture, and in this way determine the
maximum safe injection pressure.   Although, injecting at
this critical pressure will determine the maximum safe in-
jection pressure, working so close to the critical formation
pressure may invite breaching the integrity of the overlying
or underlying aquicludes.  If the integrity of the aquicludes
is breached, the governing concept and philosophy of deep-
well injection and waste containment is nullified.

Natural and Artificial Escape Routes -

Faults, joints, or fractures from excessive pumping pres-
sures, formation outcrops, and unplugged or poorly plugged
                             59

-------
we lie .  ali represent  pocantia- escape  rc^~es  fj.r ir:
wasze f I aids,   Ecwever  many  oce rati :e ~.~  , z.ied  i<^^^~ "•=•-. ~:.:-^-^^  jor s_ .-i j: 3 r. ....
        ic

Pernieac 1-i.it  ma   ; -a  i". :rer.= ed
s:. 11 c a -5 ano,  3 .• as s c .-= aas r   .-. i im_;
w^ v*O C^ i^ ; ^ J^*'-^ ,»"j  ^ i1"**-^ (-^ ^.f ,^_* - ™ ^
are propped,  -..,^  /, 1
lieved.  iic-wevsr.  "h
reitiairs. zones  c c  y, = ix
Iris  r. 3.t 'J..JL" ' „ "z'^r.c.'-
tage rf  r.-^. f ja j-
oped a"  dep-hs  .; ~
tha.'i 3G':rp  '100."
\/p '•f^;. ^ ai .   Me Ha. -i..".
nisn of  fii.l^r= ~ •
      -'
                       ^s-:- fracture
                       r.-; j s and './i'.
orientation cŁ
                           cic =1 5~rf-=a r.ie    -.:;
mation of a verti-r._  frazture.   5 v-. •  "  ie-/e 1 opei  2  i,atr,er.ia-.i-
cal model fcr  a.c  impervious  .icmcof .-.e-;1: -;   :ac tropic  "ie ii _:;r, ,
for calculating rhe  amount:  of upli:~   " -"  ->---  jrour.d  3jrfr.ce,
the maximum separa-ior of  rhe hori -oncally induced  frac-ure
at  the injection  -/veil sir.e  i^. -.h-~
  ressure  is
                                 _.: r :. j u: _:
                                .t ~ n f~, ~. '5." — ."-"* —
                                        i C  ^'!
 uplifts  froir  r. ir.e  i:. 7-2 '•:.!. ons made
 Lat c rate r"/ ,  T e n:~ e s s ••? -• . f r :• ~~ 1 .-1 ' "

-------






rH-
1
0
H
&H
U
E3

^
H

s
<
ELI
O

Ł5
0
H
EH

(_"!]
D
g
H
EH
CO

ED
O

EH
U
W
Eu
Eq
W

a
W
EH
*3i
[_p*
JD
U
1-3
^
U


•
r~^

O
rH
Q
fd
EH








C ~
0) -H
g W
O
M fd
Du p-i
g "^
H

rO
0) Q)
tn 4-1
fd rd
(U CD
ii ^_^ Lj
O -H EH
d en
H fi
0)
!H fd
d ft T3
tn x  4-i
a) o fd
M 2 
ft rH
EH





. — ,
VD
O
m H
g
fd x
•d
en
i — i Ł
rd O
4-1 H
O H
EH fd
0
—




f — .
«3
O
rH
p p ^ ^ ;7 ;:;
>Ł> VO OO ?-| O O
r-j H CN ON!

CN CN •<*> "-* w -r
VD VD '\! fN CO 'X
*3< ^J1 O) CTt ro "O
' '
cr, ro si* <~- CN 3-.
VD r~ '1* LTi r^j fx)
rH rH -i C-,
	 ^ — • ~_-- - ^

UD 00 rrj «r .-: CT>
r-~ o CTV f", - r--
•4* in cr\ o •_' if
r— i rH i — 1

	 	 ^ ^^ ^^
^O O OO «T- A . c. ,
ro ^f r~ oo .:•-. f-,
rH rH CN CN *i« vj.
— • — ^-^ -— •

oo in r~ uo ^ i."
ro vo rH i> i
CTi O*i iTi O. C", ij"
rH r~1 i'.| f\'




^-^ y— . ^~, s~:. s-.
in o o o ir, o
* * « * d t
vo n vo cr oo oc
OO P» "sf rH Cs O"i
rH CN ."- -=4-
	 • 	 	 • •„• ,.. 	 	 V .


r-i rO VD O tO O
. . . ,
OO VŁ) CS) CT> r". O,,
oo r~ in CN ** uT
i-H CN in oo CN IJD
{-- i 4 	 1




-• 	 . 	 	 	 ^ 	 - " -. . 	 -. 	
in m o o m -,;•'
• • . ...
^D 'vD r^) ro o\ cr>
M ro ro r~ r- o o
X fd
ro (D
g en >H
cd Ł
Td O M
rH (U
rH ft
fd
O
" — '



^-|
rd
0)
r-1 i — i
^ — f — * * — -^.^ -. — . — *


rH rH ro ro LP ir
......
00 OO vŁ) ^X> ^ *-t-
oo ro r- r-- rH .— i
rH rH CN C4 T Vl«





rH CN 00 ^J* L'"l VD

























i-i,
(.)

. > >
rn *
S o

o ;--,
.1 ! ^
C-Nj ,^
•f'
•\
-(-' ' .'
•r-> lŁ
' - -H
H Ł>
J^
rci -
-lj *— -.
C^ •!•
M o

iA, ^^

k g
 s *';
j-j 3 ;
•t~i ~'
efi /<
'^ ^ y
j; . "i
0 ^
ft F-1


>.
U}
C
o
4-1
•H
rc$
C
o












CJ
• -t


t~
TT

OO

/ss
4~!

to
13
.,...
i -«
.T
k

i — •

d'
'>

n--
f.

K/
1j
>~i
O
)~H
•H

AJ
r;
u/
g
4-i
'C
OJ

-4-1

'0)

j-;
^j
U
(t)
r-
14-1

tJ1
C",
!— i

'-fi

*
61

-------
. - - :~, ' ~  from f_e".d ooservacions  ard laboratory  experiments
 -.   the  following general conclusions to be warranted.
  .r, der ~ rcur. z. scress is roc  aene"5;  "It  does  not  appear co be mechanically
; -:;c'le  ;f.;.r ' c.: ':;":r,cai  fractures  to oo produced  in rela-
 . '.V  iT.de f'^. Ti :. ''oc,-.s by means  :Ł  total injection pres-
 -- voior  i_'-_ Ii3s than the  cocal  pressure of the over-
        ''~   ~. ' ~eo log: oaiiy  simple  and cectonically relaxed
      n-,,- only should Che  fractures in a single  field be
    oil.,  but  they should have roughly the same direction
  ..=  scrixe    •  1  '"ertical  fractures intersecting hori-
  .   ice"""'ne ab 111 t^r bsniers will  facilitate  the  vertical


  -~tion '"-f  serious concern  in  detp-weli injection is
    ,. :i;.il rrJ-'-rr ? cicn ;f fluids.   Vrdoubtedly  vertical
     .": ?  «ill  facilicate the  vertical migration  of fluids
    o'C;  fri'^cure-i  ; it  underlying  ardxor -;ver Lying aqui-
        1"-,  7 re xc1" ' -_t; chese  barriers; they rr.ay  create com-
      . :-. .>--C"=ar.  reservoirs  no*-  :the.rwise  in  .:oratrunication,
     .- . . _/ -; •. . - -  z-.-.-i wastes  co ^-3 :ape from  the  designated

-------
host reservoir into other reservoirs, possibly contaminating
future reserves of mineral resources arid fresh water horizons
This generates a critical situation when highly toxic or
hazardous wastes are being injected, especially if they have
long persistance periods or will not break down into more
innocuous substances.  Such waste types if they escape have
the potential to be a contaminant and threat to the environ-
ment for an undetermined period of time.  Hubbert15 stresses
the need for a development of down-hole instruments by means
of which, not only the vertical extent, but also the azimuth
of the fractures, can be determined.

Pressure Distance Time Relationship -

An important, but little understood consideration is the
pressure effect, at various distances from the well bore
at given times and volumes of injected fluids.  Where legal
situations may develop, or where disposal is conducted in
the vicinity of potentially valuable mineral deposits, this
factor becomes very important.  This information is useful
in predicting long range reservoir performance in design of
injection equipment, and the effect on unplugged wells in
the vicinity.  The rate at which the pressure increases in
a formation and the distance that this higher pressure moves
radially out from the injection wells can be computed for a
specific injection rate from non-equilibrium equations.  If
equilibrium conditions are approached, however, these equa-
tions are no longer applicable.  As fluid is continuously
pumped into a homogeneous unj term aquifer of infinite areal
extent, the pressure radius will increase, but at a de-
creasing rate, due to expanding storage area available.
Van Everdingen16 and others, (Appendix A), have given the
subject comprehensive treatment.  Figure k shows pressure
distribution away from the well bore of a hypothetical res-
ervoir. 1 7

Radial Fluid Travel

Radial fluid travel can be calculated initially by Equation
1 as presented by Talbot18.  Equation 2 is the equivalent
in metric (SI) terms.

These equations show single phase radial flow in a homo-
geneous formation.  Some care should be used in applying
                             63

-------
         !M _i ^


         !•- 0-- '
   -Ł i"- IE IE

   J -^?_ "3 => J


   ji<2SSS

   , r-JO i— jj UJ 5

   j2 E5 j: cr 2
   ; uj-oe x a. =
         s^
         "> in .-
      j^ ^ o -
•"I '- I- ~2. " 3 °- J- 2
•JJ  v. U. Z - ^ « -

^1 5-.7 ' Ss s ,"
   t-SStHP^P
   u,z U5 "- "- J=
   J = « 3 li. H o

   a jT > o ^^d a.
  -a.-

-------
radial flow formulas to volumetric calculations, as illu-
strated, because most permeable formations are noted for
the lack of homogeniety.  However, this equation serves
well in making initial estimates in radial fluid travel,
and does demonstrate the very large capacity of subsurface
strata.
            R =
                           H
(1)
    Where:  R = Radial distance of waste travel from well
                  bore, ft.
            V = Volume injected gpm
            P = Formation porosity as a decimal fraction
            S = Saturation effect as a decimal fraction*
            T = Injection time, year
            H = Effective formation thickness, ft.

    *The term saturation effect used here by Talbot is
     usually termed sweep efficiency in most studies of
     flow through porous media, and throughout the petro-
     leum industry.
            R =
                       1/2
                                                       (2)
    Where:  R = Radial distance of waste travel from well
                  bore, m
            Q = Volume injected m-^/s
            4> = Formation porosity as a decimal fraction
            S = Sweep efficiency as a decimal fraction
            T = Injection time, seconds
            H = Effective formation thickness, m
Extremely detailed and comprehensive treatment of radial
fluid travel has been given by Hubbert, Van Everdingen,
Van Poolen, Harleman, Skibitzke, and others (Appendix A).
                            65

-------
For  complete  O<_.'TH i
che  o.ngi.iii..  ;:. ;.c<Ł  j: . u = •; r: ah' L ,-f  ;-•-  r: .-.:.,•=•,- . ;  .v.:-;t:ar  used b^  Ln^er-
3-a~e  •.r^rrisr^; ? 3. -.•::• ouvih  »-Li: = r  of Mqher  concentrations can
be  used fcr  hurna."  :• or... -.<-ir.pt ion. r». it:, 5a"5"./-.  State requia-
                                    rr.e ~. , u.tium total dissolved
-..cris  cr coi-~"-es  -. -
sell is for  a  reser r
1000  to LV  jO'J nv '1
                                         -erred wastes vary from
                                        "jp._-ed 3-ates.
All  water vithin  thr- i';'"0  t-. n/-  "00 :n-j/' 1 range  of total dis-
solved soli is, sho;,"d he  ronsice red a potentially usable re-
source p-r huriar-  co/.^; yc- 1 :r ,   ^od _ .,  it  -jnis  tiire in  its pare
ser.t: slate  usabii  :: : - -  --e.--:>  •   wj,tfcrLra and  for irrigation
of oei"T.a;.r;  rrops  :.•/, c: 'ir.'i';ed de;j:-eir   The senior author of
this reporz  in*~est i ^ated  studies  rord'iored oy South Dakota
State L.V, i^ersic.'/ ,-  '-or.-;   i.'-^-  --,-=  -;-. i-.e  Jr. .•. vi-r •, s i :   . Kansas
all  coii c  u;? _ ;r.
 .;j'r-_  \ a -= :   : ~  .•
a:feor,s,   h  zr-.
sources raen tio
cor.o'encrar.ior> =
                             s  -„- i  ^~^r ~ . --•  •:, ~ "^nerous  other
                             -e i  ","•.-, "r-  .i^s  f,;und  thac  the ever
                             szi;o.-. i =r ;.-/  th -. ~. Tiany  animals can
                            -_•::.-   ;/- . .. • .  ~ .. e^  v ., t;;-out.  adverse
                             i.TuTacy  ': "   •; :-  -, A^e rimei.ts  from the
                             > y>   -\ --2-  r.re  r ,Ll:wing  ranges of
                            \r:  I j _.;A if c  vai-r ippt.-ar co  be
                             : .-. V'T.  ";-  ^r:m.:._c : ?.n  function and
r^  main c-
             : i a *ne

-------
SUV3A '(OSE19I  (iu
-------
            Name
           lorses
           Sneeo
                        >
ENGINEERING A
    discussion. i.i  tr_i3  sec-ion,  engineering  aspects cr  daec-
well waste management:,  wo. 11 ce  confine-d cc  veil cons ~.c^c ci ;.n .
and an  idealized deep-well program wi t:h the  rationale  for  trie
particular ;ype of  cons truce. ion  employed will  be outline!.
Most of the deep-veil  syst^ns operati.ig 1.1  the rJniced  Scat.'S
today generally nave  fallowed TC3t ^ f ~,"."e  :o:-.s trie
lowed  all of the traczices titli^.-il

The  initial tonceir.  ir.  tne p^dnri_iig,,  .:cir.sti-^cti';n ,  mi ocer-
t i on of  a dG-ep-w^ll  nanagener. t  H^.^c-.Tt 13 cr.e  prrt= r:; L ?z:  ::
life and property  55  represented  ov potai;!;-- wat^r>:  ir.d Tiiie--
rais of  etor. omi::  'dl ie  wrii-ji. :ii gr -.  a fii:..l ler, ea\:;  -n.e  s_r-
face of  mie eart.i,

The  crinc,ipal ccncern with tne  -c "-; : c _ct :.c:i cf  at deep— w^. 11
is tn.e cc33icij.ity of  ;orrosizri  it ths tubi^ar  -firccis  uti_-
ized in  tne well and  the cementir.T ^atenal=  u;?r-:^i t<~-  •.-<•?:-"-
the  casings in  the ground.  If  a  casinq strLna  ;• r the remer-t
sheath behind tl:.3  casing ^trinq  iŁ mater_a.liy .iamags-d tren
an uncontrolled "novemer.t of ir, i-?cticn fluid is  no1-,  tn'.;'
possible, cj.t q^i r.e  probable,  into zones which  nay  very  well
contain  minerals cf  val'io or to tax; ie  water,   Because  ~f  tnis
it is  recommended  rhat  ail injection  fluid be .Conducted  to
the  in"1 action face  through a sacrificial <-ube .  ir.d  tnat  the
casing s crimes be  prorected at  all time .3 from ten tare witn.
the  inieoted materials,

The  beginning point  in  pianr.ir.a  the ..eep-w-=ll is the  tubing
string which will  serve tc conduct t:.e in-ectied material
•Ł-Q ^- "-, ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ c "^ 1 on  iface ,   ^-M 3 ^ 'ih~ ' T*c ~ tri " z  ^c 3''j." d ce  ton™
strucoed ;f a material  vvri;h haa  5.i"ar.le re ?:: a->. : cal  prc.c-r-
tis.s for the depth of  tne veil,  ar. - '"ili cave adequacy  fliv'
characteristics f : .:  ~he ler-tn  jf tn-:; 5 1 r i ~ r  a/1 'i tne  wla"1.."?^

-------
rate  of injection.   Certair. plc'is-;      *  •.   r,-?  ,.,*-.,:." • <\
plastic tubes have  excellent corrosio- c": -.1 stance and flow
characteristics; however, in most  cases 'r.'-y  ar-  "".asking  in
the mechanical strength which  is  desirable fjr  a deep-well
system.  The plastic tubes also are nora'-ally  limited in the
pressure which they can withstand.   Probably  t.he Jdeal
tubing would be  a steel tube which  has been  internally
coated with the  plastic material  or appropriate  corrosion
resistance for the  materials to be  injected.  A  problem
which existed early in the development of plastic lined
tubing was the number of holidays  (a gap in  the  plastic
coating)  which would exist in  the  tubing string,,  but care-
ful attention to the coating process and the  utiliz.-tiDn
of holiday detectors has minimized  thiis pr.'  ler ,

With  the establishment of the  •-•' •,: ^  lui : . .  si.:° .  the
casing sizes required for tne  const ru-'t-i ._T c t tho v.-ell are
determined.  The number of casino  stTJ'ioi vv':i h  w i 1 •  be
utilized is determined by the  cond:.f k"-< c >;. ,. .-.le-f  in the
area.   There also should be a  ir.inimur   1  :•• •  .;-,jr,cf •-1 : :.-.•- -
in the deep-well system and for vtiy ., .ep v-: ;.^ -  or  :ri;^ = ;il
drilling conditions, additi oa.-iJ c>u, •_. *. ;,<.:.'  ; •; . 1>C"  -  1  •
run.

Casing lines in  deep-well systems  3n....'-;_._• •:>'.-  ^" b ..--.juragea
because of the numerous probl^r:^  _. ::;t-. •: -  • *•  -. ".:if-i r use,
A good seal at the  liner h an got-  , •,  d -   ^"./    :•: i-e;^ inq
a liner often does  not result  ir;  ,?  . ,-c. -   -•   . - •-,[•<-. .-*.h
around the pipe, and the size  reciu:;1. -vr -.jft^.'-i "''-  fo^
workovers or cleanouts.  Howe vet,  r.-,-.  -••>/; •  .->r..' -: t: .
against the use  of  casing Jincrs  ; s .•„•'-  ;:•   -^---  -  . - '-;. ^
the use of gravel packed screen ::>;'.:r:  • \; ,    !:   •.-.-•.;•-'  :-
dated sand sections or similar nee-  ,

The first casing string shou]-1 I,-.  .-.: t  -.;  -A J> ; • "•  >:: <: f i -:•!.•?at
to be a minimum  of  15 m (50";   vo.l^u t-\*.r< ^->v..s-  'r  ^,.->  wor.er
zone  in the area and this ca^ir:-1  .-.t-r.^.c; -;ii.,,.1ri o   r--::-?f; Led
by the pump and  plug method :~r'.;>,<  ch-. :-)•,''. -.'r  /'" ' : -.-  '-:-. :~iag
to the surface.  Subsequent casing  ?.*" i '.i-:  >•- --V -:  :• >  ce-
mented until the cement ar.d th'.1 -; -.r. M", •:  .    ;- '---a-"   '.. .M
(50')   inside the next largest  casing string.  Al'i  -jj.
strings should be me char. Lral ly  •"r.!:! •• ' . '•-•> : •-• t!:  •,;:
hole  to ensure a consistent tnirk-noc,;:  •'--  '     ..•••. V;
and the highest  possible quail!;,,  ^i ;.;.  • .  :..-:-.:  - • "vration

-------
With the final casing string, whether it is set on top of
the host zone or set through the host zone to be perforated,
the cement system should be planned to be compatible with
the injected fluid.  An example of incompatible cementing
systems and injected fluids are normal Portland cement and
sulfate rich injected materials.  Normal Portland cement is
subject to attack by the sulfate ion with subsequent dete-
rioration and potentially complete failure of the cement
system.  There are modifications possible in the cement sys-
tem which will remove the threat of sulfate attack.  The
most common modification and most nearly ideal in most in-
stances, is the utilization of pozzolan in the cement system.
Cement systems should be designed and tested for compati-
bility with the injected material prior to construction of
the deep-well.  In the case where extensive modificaition of
the cement system is required, the entire system need not
be modified, but perhaps the last one hundred feet of cement
sheath above the injection zone be of the modified composi-
tion .

Probably the most important protective measure which can be
taken in the construction of a deep-well is the cementing of
the casing from the bottom of the casing string well into
the next casing string.  This procedure will protect the
casing from external corrosion by virtue of the cement
sheath around it, and the maintenance of a sealed annulus
between the injection tubing and the casing with a non-
corrosive fluid filling the annulus.  Figure 8 is a sche-
matic diagram of a completion and cementing program designed
for maximum protection of hardware and zones outside the
host, reservoir for all waste types now being injected.

Another safety feature which is possible is the utilization
of an extra casing packer which is set after placement of
the cement to form an additional seal between the casing
and the annulus.  At least three manufacturers produce
these packers which when set after the cementing operation
become an integral part of the cement system.  These packers
provide an elastometric seal between the casing and the
porthole so the elastometer selected for these packers
should be one that is not subject to attack by the injected
materials.
                             70

-------
           FINAL



           INTERMEDIATE CASING


           SURFACE CASING
ANNULUS PRESSURE GAUGE
 NOTE- A CASING STRING SHALL BE CEMENTED
      THAT CEMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST SOFT.
      INTO THE NEXT LARGER STRING.
Figure 8.  Completion recommended for  maximum  protection during

                            waste  injection
                                  71

-------
Completion Types Illustrated

Two types of typical well casing programs used in waste dis-
posal wells are shown in Figure 9.  The left diagram shows
an open hole completion in which the long string of casing
is set at the top of the injection zone and cemented to the
surface.  The injection zone is uncased if it is in ci com-
petent formation.  A perforated liner may be installed in
the open hole section to prevent cave-ins from closing off
a part of the injection zone.  The right hand diagram shows
a cased hole completion in which the long casing string is
set through the injection zone and cemented.  The casing is
then perforated opposite the injection zone to open the well-
bore to the formation.  Note that both wells have an outer,
or surface, casing which is set at a depth below the deepest
"usable" water zone and then cemented to the surface.,  These
diagrams show waste being injected through the long string.
This is not recommended for several reasons:12

    a)  The waste fluid is in contact with the protective
       casing string.  Corrosion of this casing may ter-
       minate the useability of the well or cause an ex-
       pensive repair requiring a new and smaller string
       of casing.

    b)  Corrosion products may plug or severely reduce the
       capacity of the injection zone.

    c)  A casing leak could occur and not be detected for
       a considerable period of time.  This would permit
       the escape of the wastes to a formation other than
       the injection zone.

Figure 10 shows three well diagrams.  The left diagram is of
a well in which the tubing is allowed to hang free.  In this
type of completion, the annular space is filled with a fluid
such as fresh water or fuel oil and then shut in at the sur-
face.,  This completion has the same disadvantage as a well
without tubing insofar as detecting leaks in the casing.
The middle well illustrates a type of tubing completion used
in some waste disposal wells.  The tubing is set in a packer
located down in the injection zone below the top.  Water is
injected through the annulus into the top of the injection
                             72

-------
        I;i!; ^'ivxl^r^yiji m$$j>
        '•I l'!''-V'l'^Si|lllil
          M^ii^l-'ySfSllllil


                               to
                               c;
                               O
                               cx

                               E
                               u
                               (V
                               a
                               5




















FyNNN-
•Xvi'i
X'X'i'
1 1 1 1 1 J 1 J 1 J
i'X'X'
' 1 ' I ' t ' 1 ' 'l
i ' i l X ' i ' i
t 'l 'l *j'l ' <
lilt'
'X'X'i
1 X ' ! ' I ' i
'X'l'X
'X'X'i

X'X'I1
'X'X1'
f'-'ijl'l

!°!'f A'
1 'l*l ' »*!'
'i'i'i'i'i
! i ' t . i ! i ! i
'(!i'if i ['
» i t i i
J i ; i i ! i i
''X'X'
.X'^y
ixvy^


^ '^~- >



^ ^
', >>






\y
,4 '
-'


s^^^^^^rr

!',''!'
'•}'\>\
i!i!;i
• 'is1
' I'i'i
i'X1
'!'*.'!
[I;!;!
X'l

';!;!;
'I1' *
'ipt
.'!'!'

ij't'i
»Vi
!'!'!

I;!;!

" v •




-





•,


,' . -.',;
• -,i
-• "'--:

'-' '/
r i ip ii1 i '
X'X'ivX'i
;!|i;v|X;y
i'i'i'iii'i'i'i'
'X1'1!'''!'!1'
XX'X ''t'Xi1
'I'J'i'X'I'I'1
i;i;i;!;!:i;i;i;
'i'i'i!'!;'i'i'i
vi vX'X1!'

'I'l'lvX'l'!'
Cvc.
H^'Ji
1 '';'
•;n|
JL'rtl-
M
M
V-
a
1
a
OL
[HjlH
ifa]
n f '
1 1 s1 1 ' . ' i1 * i ' . 'i j i "^
'X'X Xv'HiKr •
X'l-lil'X'i'liii1 K
'1'i'i'i'i'i'i'i!
'i'!'i''ii'i'i'}
nit
''X|!'X;!;,j
!i!'!'!'!i!"!i!i
•r

T
Hi
Jh H"
^
                               t
                               O
                              CJ>

                              O
                              to
                              o
                              en

                              o>

                              cr
                              L_
73

-------
OJ


c:
o
in
a
f

c.
CO
c
O


a)

o.
E
o
tr>
a>
o.
a)
a>
a
en

-------
zone above the packer while the waste fluid is injected
through the tubing into the lower portion of the injection
zone.  This design has the same disadvantage discussed for
the previous completion method in that the casing is sub-
ject to the injection pressure, the detecting of any casing
leaks is not positive, and corrosion of the casing and tubing
will undoubtedly be experienced.  In addition to the sub-
stantial expense necessary for the injection of the water
into the annulus, this reduces the capacity of the well for
waste disposal.  The right hand diagram shows the type of
completion generally favored for injection wells.  The tubing
is equipped with a packer, of suitable construction to re-
sist deterioration by the waste material, which is set in
the casing above the disposal zone.  The packer provides a
seal to isolate the annulus space above the packer from the
waste fluids, and may need to have the bottom portion made
of a special alloy such as stainless steel or a plastic-
coating may suffice depending on the nature of the injected
material.  The annulus space is filled with an inert liquid
such as oil with a corrosion inhibitor in it and placed
under pressure.  Should there be a failure of the tubing or
packer or casing then the annulus pressure will change which
will serve as an alarm indicating leakage.  Injection can
then be stopped until repairs are made.  With the fluid
filled pressurized annulus, a packer or tubing leak will be
detected at the surface as decreasing pressure if injection
pressure is lower than the annulus pressure and as in-
creasing pressure if the injection pressure is greater than
the annulus pressure.  Should a casing leak develop, this
will manifest itself as falling pressure at the surface as
the annulus fluid is lost through the casing leak.  A tail
pipe of noncorrosible material may be extended below the
packer as illustrated in the diagram.  A light noncorrosive
fluid or inert gas may be placed in the space around the
tail pipe below the packer, thus providing protection for
the packer and casing at this point.  The type completion
just described offers the greatest protection of the casing,
thereby affording the best protection for zones other than
the injection formation.

If the practices of the recommended completion procedure are
followed, the integrity of the casing string is virtually
assured for beyond the useful life of the deep-well.  Even
when severe corrosion attacks on the injection tubing have
                             75

-------
caused its deterioration to a degree where it can no longer
be used for injection, it can be replaced without violating
the integrity of the casing string.  Also, if desired as a
policy of preventive maintenance, the injection tubing may
be replaced at regular intervals before failure of the
string occurs.

CHEMICAL ASPECTS

In determining whether or not a waste is suitable for injec-
tion into deep-wells, the chemical properties of the; waste,
the formation minerals and the interstitial fluids are very
important.  Precautions must be taken so that the waste it-
self will not harm the environment, and that there will be
no reactions; or, if any reactions do take place, they will
not be harmful.

Most streams which are disposed of by injection into deep-
wells do not consist of only one chemical, but are usually
several chemicals mixed.  In some mixed streams, some or
all of the characteristics of the individual constituents
may exist.  In others, reactions ir.ay occur which will pro-
duce entirely different characteristics20.  The reactions
which would take place upon mixing may not be known arid
tnus make results unpredictable.  These reactions which
take place may produce materials which are more hazardous
than any of the materials prior to mixing or they may can-
cel any hazardous effects which existed in the individual
components.  There is still much to be learned about the
toxicology of materials, expecially the effects of expo-
sure to them in low level concentrations over a long period
of time.  This lack of knowledge is further complicated by
mixing different wastes into one waste stream.  Care should
be exercised by those handling waste to prevent coming in
contact with it and to prevent the; escape of any of the
material outside of the area where: it is confined awaiting
disposal.

Chemical Effects on the Environment

It is important to know as much as possible about the waste
and the environment into which it is injected before injec-
tion is started, because once the waste is put 'underground
there is practically no control over it.21  There will be

-------
some  changes in the  reservoir roaa ^ ; >.?:~::  o '! -/:<= rompat il'i.l J t
of the  waste and host.   The gro"tv' v^ter  sy-*..-:n :-i char.-jer3
and fluids containing  different. •; ir-p,. c^ 13  rrc:u r.h^oc  of  th-
native  fluids will enter the r<- -el vir.i  r ui -•. ' ,  In soir, i
cases,  the quality of  ground wc~-r  -     «-er 'i,  '. .   .i-'^ral
resources  existing in  the subsu- ra. ,-•• -'i.e  -; - . - ar.v-.^ ecu  and
there can  be reactions between the '.  rr:  ..-,..  • a'U  •-'it-oral
water,  or  reactions  between the v\?.*•>-•.  --i?-.  jr.i -'-   •-".ck  it:
the interval where the injection  : ,t / ."-

The impact on the environment of mo- i.  -<-}\-..'-•:•:•.  *• <.. ^-      .-'•  •
and regulating agencies,  is that of o-n
ground  water.  Contamination can o-:c;r
water from the underground storage are.
into  a  fresh water aquifer.  R scape- CM;
sion  of the casing by  unneutraJ .• ;.-^,-,  .   :   ..     ,        i..tw
the well.   The acids could cause cv r:-.1^. o    -  •: T.- :L tj snt  both
above and  below the  surface.  Once -,:v.- ',".--t:,  \i -   .,;ched  the
injection  ^one, it is  possible ::or  , -.-   ..- .  ; .; -,.-,v.ape ver-
tically into fresh water aquifers  r ' _ .•.  /,-,   - -,-.,-:,,   :-,ods.22
Channels can be cut  or dissolved  tr ,:••-,   t .. • it  . ~.   ~. ipq
beds by the waste if there are rr.L;ifi^^;  i...-  r •<=' 'j-f c  , -:nid-
are soluble or reactive  with t -ie che^
water.   Other means by which t"e was'~<
injection  zone include nearby .imprcjjo
wells or those which have corrected or
The waste  could also escape laterally  ,y  "-1 .'?- i.-'rig into
fresh water zones in the same aquifer    •;,/  .1 /  o;. ering ^
circulating stream which could mr. :• p<..••. r.  t/ .. .  ir.l-^ other
areas.

Near Belle Glade, Florida, lateral nic.ven:ent of waste being
injected into a disposal wt-11 at; rates  r,;
0.050 m3/s (400 - 800 gpm)  and operating
spring,  had reached  a  deep monitor well  .
in 1967, injection having been started  .L;
1969, 27 months after  injection began,
the waste, either around the casing >>r
fining  beds,  was indicated by aeocherai','
in a shallow monitor well 23 m (!-'•  av
deep.   The well was  deepened in 1971f
sumed in January 1972.   Ten months Intor
4.5 m (151)  of a 7 m (23')  length cf r.i 1.
; .L j. -...-. j-f

-------
been removed by corrosion.  The waste was hot, acidic, highly
organic and contained high concentrations of nitrogen and
phosphorus.  The temperature range was from about 344 K -
376 K (71°C - 103°C)  and the pH ranged from 2.6 to 4.5.

The geochemical effects of the upward leakage of the waste
included changes in both the native fluids and the aquifer.
The concentrations of calcium, magnesium, organic carbon,
COD, and alkalinity in the native water were increased.  The
pH arid sulfate concentrations were reduced and there was gen-
eration of considerable hydrogen siilfide.  There was dissolu-
tion of the carbonate rocks, sulfate reduction, and anaerobic
decomposition of the organics.  Methane, nitrogen, and carbon
dioxide were produced by organic decomposition.  In this case
the confining beds were unable to resist the attack of the
hot acidic waste.23

In a well at Mulberry, Florida, which was completed at 1519 m
(4984')  into which industrial acidic waste was injected, in-
jection tests indicated the dissolution of carbonate rock in
the injection zone with a change in the permeability and por-
osity of the zone.  It was also indicated that there was
leakage through the confining beds.  Chemical reactions could
take place between the waste and the confining beds which
could reduce their ability to confine the waste.21*

An industrial organic waste was injected into a disposal well
near Wilmington, North Carolina, to study the interactions
resulting from injecting a waste containing organic compounds
into the subsurface.  Solids larger than 20 pm were removed
and CaO was added to adjust the pH to 4.  The aquifer used
for the injection zone consisted of sandstone, gravel and
limestone.  It was found that first the organic acids are
neutralized by the carbonates in the aquifer.  Dissolution
of the aluminosilicate clay minerals by the organic acids
contained in the waste are also indicated.  As the waste is
neutralized and diluted, indications are that the organic
waste is degraded microbiologically.  There appeared to be
'•lugging, due in part to methane and carbon dioxide gases
  oduced in the reaction.  Leakage was detected at the in-
  action and observation wells.  The leakage could be caused
 ./ the dissolution of aquifer solids by the organic acids.
The grout sealing the wells to the confining beds may also
 ,ave been dissolved by the organic acids, allowing the waste
to move upward into shallower aquifers.25
                              78

-------
In some cases where the confining beds above and below the
injection zone are not capable of resisting acid attack,
such as in the peninsula of Florida, it is questionable
whether an acidic waste can be confined to the injection
zone.23  In questionable areas such as this, acids should
not be injected into disposal wells, because of the great
risk of contamination of fresh water and mineral resources.
The plugging of the pores of an aquifer will cause a de-
crease in the permeability and porosity of the injection
zone.  This, in turn, results in either an increase in the
injection pressure or a decrease in the injection rate.
Plugging can be caused by solids or entrained gases in the
stream or by reaction of the waste with the aquifer or inter-
stitial fluids.  Auto-reactivity of the waste constituents
may also take place, after injection, at the temperature
and pressure of the aquifer.  Soft mushy solids and gela-
tinous precipitates are plugging agents as well as the hard
rigid ones.  Soft mushy solids, such as hydrometal oxides
and sulfides would tend to adhere to the surface of the
porous medium to greater extent than rigid solids.26  Acid
and aluminum nitrate waste with calcium carbonate results
in a gelatinous precipitate which can cause plugging.1
Clay minerals can also cause plugging or a decrease in the
permeability of a sandstone containing them when the pH of
a water is increased, the salinity is decreased, or the
valence of cations in solution is decreased.

Preinjection Treatment

Usually solids in a waste stream are filtered out prior to
injection to prevent plugging and in some cases, consti-
tuents which are known to react with chemicals in the aqui-
fer to produce plugging are removed by treatment on the sur-
face.  Some of the chemical treatments employed to remove
chemicals which could react in the formation to cause plug-
ging will produce large volumes of sludge or precipitates
which then present another problem, that of solid waste dis-
posal.27  Another method used to prevent precipitates from
forming when they are expected to form from reactions be-
tween the waste and formation fluids, is to inject a fluid
which is not reactive with either of them ahead of the waste
to form a buffer between them.28  There is one problem which
can arise in this procedure, that is the possibility of the
fluids bypassing each other in the formation.21  Uniform
                             79

-------
distribution of the buffer is prevented by the hetergeneous
nature of porosity and permeability of the rock.  However,
it can be expected that the waste will follow the buffer,
since liquids will follow the path  of least resistance.28
Waste can also be treated to reduce the toxicity of some of
the chemicals contained in it and in this way some of the
streams not suitable for injection because of their toxi-
city may be made suitable.

Reactions

There are a number of reactions which can take place once a
waste has entered the aquifer.  Some of the reactions may be
anticipated from a knowledge of the chemistry of the waste,
the aquifer minerals and the interstitial fluids.  Labora-
tory tests can be used to determine reactions between the
three components involved.l  Samples of the aquifer fluid
and minerals are not usually available until the well is
drilled, which means that tests could not be run until dril-
ling is completed.  Even using the aquifer fluids and min-
erals, all reactions which might take place w.: ~.':..•.n the for-
mation may not be predicted in the Iciboratory, since the
temperature and pressure of the injection zone could influ-
ences the reactions.  The well should be allowed to flow un-
til a true sample of the reservoir fluid can be obtained
since the samples taken immediately after drilling will be
contaminated with drilling fluids.  Cores should be taken
to determine the mineral character of the proposed injection
and confining zones.

The reactions between injected and interstitial fluids which
can cause the formation of plugging precipitates were listed
by Selm and Hulse.  These are:

     (1)  precipitation of alkaline earth metals  (calcium,
         barium, strontium and magnesium) as relatively
         insoluble carbonates, sulfates, orthophosphates,
         fluorides and hydroxides;

     (2)  precipitation of metals such as iron, cadmium,
         zinc and chromium as insoluble carbonates,
         hydroxides, orthophosphates and sulfides; and

     (3)  precipitation of oxidation-reduction reaction
         products.
                             80

-------
In Kansas, a waste consisting of cooling-tower blowdown and
zeolite water-softener backwash was injected into a lime-
stone formation.  The well plugged within a year and was
deepened into the Arbuckle Formation, which was more per-
meable.  The injection capacity began decreasing as it had
in the other zone.  It was found that precipitates formed
when chromates and phosphates used as corrosion inhibitors
came into contact with barium sulfate, hydrogen sulfide and
soluble iron in the Arbuckle water.29

Reactions can also take place which would cause the toxicity
to increase when injected into subsurface environments.  The
anaerobic conversion of mercury and inorganic mercury to
methyl mercury and the anaerobic conversion of nitrilotri-
acetate to nitrosamines are examples.  Methyl mercury, among
others, can be concentrated through food chains leading even-
tually to humans.20  Examples of mercury being concentrated
in food chains are:  In 1960, 111 persons were reported to
have died or suffered serious neurological damage near
Minamata, Japan, as a result of eating fish and shellfish
which had been contaminated by methyl mercury and mercuric
chloride discharged into Minamata Bay by a plastics manu-
facturing plant.  In the spring of 1970, the fish in Lake St.
Clair, on the border between Canada arid the United States
were discovered to contain high levels of mercury.30  The
toxicity of the waste and the reactions which might take
place yielding even more toxic materials should be of impor-
tance when deciding whether or nor a waste should be injected
into a disposal well.  There is always the possibility of
accidental escape of these hazardous chemicals into the
groundwater system from where they may be able to migrate
to potable water aquifers or to the surface,

The chemical characteristics of a waste and those of the
environment into which it will be injected are extremely
important in determining the suitability of the waste for
deep-well disposal.  Since there is almost no control over
a waste once it has been injected and there is no tested
method of reversing the migration or recovering the injected
material, it is very important to know as much as possible
about the interactions which will take place between the
waste and the minerals in the aquifer, and the waste and
native fluids.
                             81

-------
Profile reports for the chemicals being injected into dis-
posal wells are found in Appendix C.  These profiles cover
the chemical and physical properties, toxicity, hazairds,
and recommendations for handling, storage and transportation
of the chemicals as well as recommendations for disposal of
waste containing them.  Some chemicals are treated in less
detail than others because of the great variation of avail-
able information.

MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS

A variety of algae, fungi, bacteria, and protozoa can live
in most parts of a waste injection system (collection, stor-
age, treatment, connecting lines, injection wells, and the
receiving formation).  The action of the organisms on the
waste may be a beneficial biochemical degradation such as
is practiced in biological waste-treatment processes before
surface discharge.  Or the effects may be detrimental,
causing erosion of equipment; plugging of filters, screens,
and injection formations; and producing toxic compounds as
a result of waste degradation.

Algae are precluded by the absence of light in the injection
zone, however, they may proliferate in any part of the in-
jection system exposed to light.  Protozoa and fungi are pre-
cluded by the anaerobic conditions usually present in injec-
tion zones, however, like the algae, they may proliferate in
any part of the system where conditions may be favorable for
their growth.  Yeasts are capable of anaerobic metabolism,
but their occurrence in salaquifers is not documented.  Bac-
teria occur under the conditions of waste injection in the
injection zone, and some recent studies show them to be the
important organisms concerned.

Recent research  (some in progress or in review) substan-
tiates the importance of bacterial growth in the receiving
formation in various dilutions of waste and salaquifer water
and lead to recommendations that the role of bacteria be
carefully investigated before the injection of wastes.  The
premise that deep-well waste injection can be used for tem-
porary storage of wastes must be revised to the extent that
many of the injected wastes will most probably be greatly
modified during their storage by bacterial degradation.
                             82

-------
The hydrogeological conditions and the chemical nature of
the various toxic wastes are so variable that each injection
system should be thoroughly investigated with a feasibility
study before injection begins.  This study should consider
the biogeochemical aspects of the waste-aquifer interaction
zones as well as the more traditional physical parameters.

Thorough testing of the biogeochemical interactions of the
injection zone aquifer with the waste should be done in a
manner similar to the following:

    a.  the bacterial growth potential of the undiluted
        waste solution and mixtures of waste and native
        formation water should be determined;

    b.  material from the formation, preferably from well
        cores, should be included in the tests;

    c.  oxidation-reduction potentials of the test solu-
        tions should be adjusted to values which are typical
        of the formation.  Oxygen should be excluded from
        the solutions if appropriate to the injection con-
        ditions ;

    d.  the test should be conducted at temperatures and
        pressures that approximate the operating conditions
        expected during waste injection;

    e.  adequate data must be collected on waste chemical
        reactions with injection zone water, injection zone
        minerals, and microbial degradation under the above
        conditions;

    f.  during the testing if there is any indication of
        probable plugging effects, studies of the best
        method of microbial growth control should be deter-
        mined before the problem arises;

    g.  any indications of erosion of the injection system
        hardware should be utilized in the engineering de-
        sign.

Recent microbiological research related to deep-well injec-
tion and applicable to all types of waste is presented in
Appendix F.
                             83

-------
GROUND WATER USE

Usable ground water, whether potable or otherwise, is some-
thing that must be given maximum protection during all phases
of deep-well injection of all types of waste.  Consideration
of where ground water may be encountered and how it must be
protected is necessary from the moment of the deep-well site
selection, during the operating life of the well, and through
the plug setting upon abandonment of the well.

Table 8 shows the percentage of ground water use related to
total water use by states.31 There is no direct correlation
throughout most of the United States between ground water
used and injection wells drilled.  However, the largest
number of deep-wells in the United States are concentrated
along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana and Texas which is indica-
tive of good available host reservoirs, from most of which
ground water is also drawn for domestic and industrial use.

Figure II32 shows the shallowest depth of water containing
more than 1000 ppm dissolved solids in the conterminous
United States.  This concentration of solids, although tech-
nically below drinking water standards19 and classified as
brackish33 can be misleading in planning for deep-well in-
jection.  The potential use for water with concentrations
between 1000 and 10 000 ppm is great..  Many cities and towns
throughout the country have water supplies with concentra-
tions of dissolved solids above 1000 ppm and water with con-
centrations up to 10 000 ppm may be used for stock watering.

Aquifers vary from unconsolidated to well consolidated sand-
stones, limestones, and volcanic rocks.  Unconsolidated to
semi-consolidated aquifers are found mainly along the
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains; in the High Plains of West
Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Nebraska; in parts of Florida;
parts of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota; the Great
Valley of California, and other parts of the Sierra Cascade
and Pacific Mountain Ranges; as well as portions of the
Basin and Range and Colorado Plateau provinces.  Consoli-
dated aquifers are present throughout most of the rest of
the country and vary greatly in their storage Ccipacity and
transmissibility.  Several areas such as the Florida penin-
sula, and the region surrounding the Great Lakes, as well as
smaller areas in the Rocky Mountain, Colorado Plateau and
Columbia Intermontane provinces have major prominent consol-
idated aquifers in addition to prominent unconsolidated ones.
                              84

-------
      Table 8.   GROUNDWATER USE IN THE  CONTIGUOUS
                      UNITED STATES FOR  1970*
EPA Region Percentage
and of Total
State Use
Region I
Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Region II
New Jersey
New York

Region III
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia

Region IV
Alabama
Georgia
Florida
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee

Region V
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota

4
5
8
8
8
38


16
5


6
3
4
5
1


4
12
20
4
37
7
5
5


7
5
7
22
EPA Region Percentage
and of Total
' State Use
Region V (contd)
Ohio
Wisconsin

Region VI
Arkansas
Louisiana
Oklahoma
New Mexico
Texas

Region VII
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska

Region VIII
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming

Region IX
Arizona
California
Nevada

Region X
Idaho
Oregon
Washington

5
8


50
17
59
50
34


24
83
12
55


16
2
14
58
16
4


62
38
16


16
16
12
*Water power use excluded
                             85

-------
'"'"'"''^^^^f^^^^M^^^
        \ x —f>~^ / f.' S ^L. ..*	* .t i	J -
                sv^	^
                                01

                                m


                                o
                                4—

                                CO



                                -o
                                
-------
MONITORING

Monitoring of the operation of a deep-well injection and
waste management system can logically be divided into four
distinct functions, which are:

        1.  the operation of surface equipment

        2.  the operation of well equipment

        3.  the injection face operation

        4.  the behavior of the injected fluid
            in the reservoir or host rock

Pressure and injection rate are the two primary phenomenon
on which most lend themselves to measurement for monitoring
purposes.

Surface Equipment

The monitoring of the performance of surface equipment is
accomplished by the physical inspection of the facility and
the observance of pressure or rate abnormalities as signals
of a malfunction in the equipment.

Operation of Well Equipment

The monitoring of well equipment is to assure the operator
of the integrity of the well, and that no leaks have oc-
cured in the well tubular goods.  This can be readily ac-
complished in a well system as outlined in the well con-
struction section where the annulus between the casing and
injection tubing is sealed by a suitable packer and the an-
nulus loaded with a noncorrosive packer fluid under pressure,
A change in the pressure recorded on the annulus is then in-
dicative of a leak in the casing or tubing string which
calls for immediate remedial action.  This is perhaps the
simplest of all monitoring operations, and the most vital to
the protection of life and property in a deep-well system.
Electrical circuits may, of course, be integrated into these
monitoring schemes, thus providing automatic shutdown when
a predetermined condition established by the operator is
reached.
                             87

-------
Injection Face Operation

Monitoring of the performance of the well at the injection
face can be accomplished only by inference with the measure-
ment of injection rate and pressure.  The most common form
of failure which might occur at the face would be reservoir
plugging with precipitated material either carried to the
face in the injection fluid or as a result of a reaction
between the injected fluid, the host rock, and/or the fluid
indigenous to the host rock.  A thorough analysis of the
waste to be processed, the reservoir rock, and the reservoir
fluid will predict the probability of face plugging and this
then can be confirmed by observing an increase in pressure
and/or decrease in injection rate with increased cumulative
injection.

When the injection rate falls to an intolerable level or
the injection pressure rises to a level approaching that of
formation fracturing or the economic maximum injection pres-
sure, then remedial action to cleanse the face must be con-
sidered.

Re se rvodr^ JFlui d B eh a vi o r

A hazard which exists in any injection program is that the
fracturing pressure of the host rock will be exceeded which
can lead to a breakdown of the host rock followed by an un-
controlled injection which could under certain circumstances
result in the migration of injected material outside the
planned host reservoir.  Thus it is imperative that the frac-
ture pressure of the host rock not ~be exceeded by the injec-
tion of waste material.  There are no rigid rules by which
fracture pressures can be predicted, and the pressure gra-
dients vary from a low of 9.0 to > 45.2 kPa/m (0.4 to > 2
psi/ft.) of depth.  Possibly the most advantageous consider-
ation of fracture pressure and avoiding it with the injec-
tion of waste would be to determine the fracture initiation
pressure upon initial conclusion of the waste well.  This
can be accomplished by injection at a rate sufficiently high
to achieve a steadily increasing pressure, which upon
reaching the fracture pressure will immediately fall off to
a much lower pressure with constant injection rate.  If
there is no propping material in the injection fluid with
cessation of pumping the fracture initiated will close and
                              88

-------
the formation will not again fracture until that pressure
is reached a second time.  This technique is utilized in
oil and gas production to develop a base line for fracture
pressures and to establish an upper limit of injection pres-
sure.  This might be well worthy of consideration in waste
injection projects where a background of experience in the
area and in the unique formation does not give an upper
limit injection pressure.  With the establishment of the
base line pressure, monitoring of injection pressures then
will warn of an impending fracture initiation so that this
can be avoided.

Monitoring of the movement of injected fluid in the reser-
voir is the most difficult of all.  It has been suggested
that monitor wells be utilized to observe the movements of
the injected fluids within the reservoir.  A static monitor
well may very well never show an indication of the passage
of injected fluids beyond the well unless the well is in
continuous operation with sufficient withdrawal to provide
a pressure sink at the point to draw injected fluid into
the well bore for sampling.  The continual pumping of a
monitor well creates a new problem in that the pumpage from
the monitor well must itself be disposed of.  The simplest
means of disposal would be to return- the pumpage to the in-
jection well stream for injection into the host reservoir.
This then requires an oversizing of surface injection facil-
ities to accommodate this additional well stream or well
streams.  If a gradual dispersion of the injected ions is
occurring as the injected stream displaces the indigenous
water, it can be extremely difficult to identify this
leading edge of injection material unless some distinctive
ion is present in the monitor well effluent which can serve
as a flag to identify the injected material.  The operation
of a monitor well with continuous pumpage can, by virtue of
its pressure sink, distort the shape of the injected fluid
encroachment pattern to create the illusion that the in-
jected fluid is advanced a greater distance from the injec-
tion well than is really the case.  The same rationale ap-
plies to monitor wells which are drilled in an attempt to
monitor vertical movements of injected fluid as with wells
drilled to the host reservoir.  A further complication of
monitor wells which attempt to monitor vertical movement is
that the creation of the pressure sink at the monitor well
                             89

-------
in an attempt to determine if there is vertical migration
of the injected fluid can in reality cause this vertical
migration where it might not have occurred without the
operation of the pressure sink.
                            90

-------
                       SECTION III

                     REFERENCES CITED

 1.  Warner, D. L. ,  Subsurface Disposal of Liquid Industrial
     Wastes by Deep-Well Injection, Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geo.
     Mem. 10, pp 11-20, 1968.

 2.  Donaldson, E. C., Subsurface Disposal of Industrial
     Wastes in the United States, U.  S. Bur. Mines Inform.
     Circ. 8636, p 24, Fig. 4, 1974.

 3.  Algermisen, S.  T., Seismic Risk  Studies in the United
     States, Fourth World Conf. on Earthquake Eng.
     (Santiago, Chile, Jan. 14, 1969)  Preprint, 10 pp, 1969.

 4.  McLean, D. D.,  "Subsurface Disposal -- Precautionary
     Measures", Ind. Water Eng.,  Vol.  6, No. 8, pp 20-22,
     1969.

 5.  Reeder, L. R.,  Underground Waste Disposal Systems,
     Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with  Program, Vol. 4, No. 4,
     p 290, Feb.,  1972.

 6.  Reader. L, R.,  Reservoir Aspects of Deep-Well Disposal,
     Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Mid Continent Regional Mtg.
     (Tulsa, Oct.  3-5, 1973)  Program,  pp 26-27, 1973  (Abstr.
     Only) .

 7.  Amyx, J. W. ,  et al, Petroleum Reservoir Engineering;,
     McGraw-Hill,  New York, 610 pp, 1960.

 8.  Krumbein, W.  C., and L.  L. Sloss,  Stratigraphy and
     Sedimentation F  W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco,
     497 pp, 1953.

 9.  Geerstma, J., "The Effect of Fluid Pressure Decline on
     Volumetric Changes of Porous Rocks", AIME Transactions,
     Vol. 210, 1957.

10.  Fatt, I., "Pore Volume Compressibilities of Sandstone
     Reservoir Rocks", J. Petrol. Technol., March 1958.
                             91

-------
11.   Howard, C.  C.,  and C.  R.  Fast,  Hydraulic Fracturing,
     AIME Monograph, Vol.  2,  Henry L.  Doherty Series,
     203 pp, 1970.

12.   Wright, J.  L.,  Is the  Earth's Crust Going to Waste,
     Part I, National Petrol.  Refiners Ass.  Mid-Continent
     Regional Mtg.  (Wichita,  Jun.  12-13, 1968)  Preprint
     MC-68-48, 8 pp, 1968.

13.   McClain, W. C., "Rock  Mechanics in the  Disposal of
     Radioactive Waste by  Hydraulic Fracturing",
     Felsmechaink Ingenieurgeologic (Int. Soc.  Rock Mech.
     J.), Vol. 6, No. 3,  pp 139-161, 1968.

14.   Sun, R. J., "Theoretical Size of Hydraulically Induced
     Horizontal Fractures  and Corresponding  Surface Uplift
     in an Idealized Medium",  J_.  Geophys. Re s. ,  Vol. 74,
     No. 25, pp 5995-6011,  1969.

15.   Hubbert, M. K. , and D. G. Willis,, Mechanics of Hy-
     draulic Fracturing,   Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Mem. 18,
     412 pp, 1971.

16.   Van Everdingen, A. F., Fluid Mechanics  of Deep-Well
     Disposal, Amer. Ass.  Petrol.  Geol. Mem. 10, pp 32-42,
     1968.

17.   Donaldson,  E.  C., Subsurface Waste Injection in the
     United States - Fifteen  Case Histories, U.  S. Bur.
     Mines Inform.  Circ.  8636, 72 pp,  1974.

18.   Talbot, J.  S.,  "Deep-Wells," Chemical Engineering,
     pp 108-111, Oct. 14,  1968.

19.   U. S. Public Health Service,  Public Health Service
     Drinking Water Standards, USPHS Pub. No. 956, 61 pp,
     1962.

20.   Booz, Allen - Applied Research Inc., Hazardous Was te
     Materials Hazardous Effects and Disposal Methods, U. S
     Environmental Protection Agency,  Contract No.
     68-03-0032, Vol. 1,  Sec.  2,  40 pp, 1973.
                             92

-------
21.  Ottinger, R. S., et al, Disposal Process Descriptions
     Ultimate Disposal, Incineration, and Prolysis Processes,
     Recommended Methods of Reduction Neutralization, Re-
     covery or Disposal of Hazardous Waste,  U. S. Environ-
     mental Protection Agency, EPA - 670/2/73 - 053-f,
     Vol. 3, 248 pp, 1973.

22.  Warner, D. L.,  and D. H. Orcutt, Industrial Wastewater -
     Injection Wells in United States - - Status of Use and
     Regulation, 2nd Int.  Symp. on Underground Waste Manage-
     ment and Artificial Recharge Preprints, Amer. Ass.
     Petrol. Geol.,  et al, Vol. 2, pp 687-697.

23.  Kaufman, M. I., et al, Injection of Acidic Waste into a
     Saline Carbonate Aquifer; Geochemical Aspects, 2nd Int.
     Symp. on Underground Waste Management and Artificial
     Recharge Preprints, Amer. Ass. Petrol.  Geol., et al,
     Vol. 1, pp 526-551, 1973.

24.  Wilson, W. E.,  et al, Hydrolggic Evaluation of Indus-
     trial - Waste Injection at Mulberry, Florida, 2nd Int.
     Symp. on Underground Waste Management and Artificial
     Recharge Preprints, Amer. Ass. Petrol.  Geol., et al,
     Vol. 1, pp 552-564, 1973.

25.  Leenheer, J. A., and R. L. Malcolm, Case History of
     Subsurface Waste Injection of an Industrial Organic
     Waste, 2nd Int. Symp. on Underground Waste Management
     and Artificial  Recharge Preprints, Amer. Ass. Petrol.
     Geol., et al, Vol. 1, pp 565-584,  1973.

26.  Amstutz, R. W., and L. C. Reynolds, Is  the Earth's
     Crust Going to  Waste - Part II, Types of Fluids In-
     jected and Treating Procedures, National Petrol.
     Refiners Ass. Mid-Continent Regional Mtg., (Wichita,
     June 12-13, 1968)  Preprint MC-68-48, 8  pp, 1968.

27.  Mohr, C. M., and P. J. O'Brien, Decision Mapping - -
     Tool for Underground Waste Management,  2nd Int. Symp.
     on Underground  Waste Management and Artificial Recharg<">
     Preprints, Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., et al, Vol. 2,
     pp 731-737, 1973.
                             93

-------
28.   Meers,  R.  J.,  Design,  Drilling and Completion,  Opera-
     tion,  and  Cost of Underground Waste-Disposal Wells in
     Gulf Coast Region of Texas  and Louisiana,  2nd Int.
     Symp.  on Underground Waste  Management and  Artificial
     Recharge Preprints,  Amer. Ass. Petrol.  Geol., et al,
     Vol. 1, pp 337-345,  1973.

29.   Latta,  B.  F.,  Subsurface Disposal of Waste in Kansas,
     2nd Int. Symp. on Underground Waste Management and
     Artificial Preprints,  Amer. Ass.  of Petrol.  Geol.,
     et al,  Vol. 1, pp 622-633,  1973.

30.   Ottinger,  R.  S.,  et  al,  National  Disposal  Site Candi-
     date Waste Stream Constituent Profile Reports.   Mercury,
     Arsenic, Chromium and Cadmium Compounds, Recommended
     Methods of Reduction,  Neutralization, Recovery or Dis-
     posaj. of Hazardous Waste, U. S. Environmental Protec-
     tion Agency,  EPA-670/2-73-053-f,  Vol. 6,  206 pp, 1973.

31.   Murray, C. R., and E.  B. Reeves,  Estimated Use of Water
     in the United States,  U. S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 676, 37
     pp, 1972.

32.   Feth,  J. H.,  et al,  Preliminary Map of the Conterminous
     United States Showing Depth to and Quality of
     Shallowest Ground Water Containing More Than 1000 ppm
     Dissolved  Solids, U. S.  Geol. Surv., Hydrologic Atlas
     199, 1965.

33.   Davis,  S.  N.,  and R. S.  M.  DeWiest, Hydrology, John
     Wiley & Sons,  Inc.,  463 pp, 1967.
                             94

-------
                        SECTION IV

                 CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE
INTRODUCTION

A substance or material is referred to as toxic if it can
produce damage to a living organism.  Its toxicity is a
measure of the amount of damage a specific quantity of
the substance may cause.  Hazardous, however, is usually
considered in terms of involvement in a situation that is
potentially damaging.  Often the conditions are such that
the two may be used synonymously.  Waste types which can
be included under these definitions are of primary con-
cern in this report.

Wastes of all types are being injected into deep wells;
coming from a wide variety of industries as well as from
municipal and domestic sources.  These wastes range from
relatively innocuous to very highly toxic and from practi-
cally inert to explosive.

The largest users of deep-well systems are the chemical,
petrochemical and pharmaceutical companies, operating about
half of the wells actively injecting today.  Oil refineries
and natural gas plants are second, with the metals industry
third.  Some of the other users of waste injection wells
are the food industry; the paper, pulp, and paperboard
industry; the textile industry, and the sanitary service
industries.

Organic and inorganic chemical waste from chemical manufac-
ture, drugs, municipal and domestic sewage, waste from the
manufacture of explosives, pesticides, fertilizers, paint
pigments, and radioactive materials are some of the con-
stituents of waste streams being injected into deep-wells.
Some of the chemicals found in these waste streams are in-
organic salt solutions, both mineral and organic acids,
caustics, chlorinated, nitrated and oxygenated hydrocarbons,
heavy metals, fluorides, and cyanides.  The chemicals are
liquid, gases and solids, the gases and solids being either
dissolved in the liquids or simply carried along by them.

                             95

-------
Most of the waste streams are treated to remove some of the
materials contained in them, before being injected into the
wells.  It appears, however, that in most cases the treat-
ment is to remove or neutralize the substances which might
damage the equipment or cause plugging of the formation
rather than to neutralize or remove materials which might
prove hazardous to the environment if they should escape
the confinement of the host reservoir.

Hazardous materials are not contained in all waste streams,
but some effluent does contain chemicals which could be
very harmful or even lethal if they were to escape from the
well or host reservoir in high enough concentrations.  Al-
though great care is taken to ensure safe construction and
operation of most wells, there is always the possibility of
accident.  There is some question as to whether it is advis-
able to inject the most hazardous wastes into deep-wells
without some preinjection treatment.  This is because so
little is known about the waste reactions and degradability
when in contact with formation water and minerals at varying
temperatures and pressures.

PROBLEMS OF ANALYZING TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTE EFFECTS

In determining the environmental effect of toxic and haz-
ardous waste, there are many complications that limit the
detail to which a determination can be made.  Most of the
problems relate directly to the availability and quality
of data needed for definative answers.

Human Effects Data Limitations
Data on human effects resulting from severe exposures to
hazardous or toxic substances are obtained principally from
reconstruction of accident situations.  A second major
source of human effects information is extrapolation from
experimental animal data.  Both sources contain many uncer-
tainties .

Where accidents have occurred, the recording of information
from the facts surrounding the accident has frequently been
so unsystematic that the possibility of missing one or more
key contributing factors is always present.  This makes
                             96

-------
quantification of causes and effects uncertain, and acci-
dents involving exactly the same set of circumstances do
not usually occur with enough frequency to calibrate the
measurement or reconstruction errors involved.  Furthermore,
some facts surrounding accidents are considered proprietary
and, even though originally recorded, may not be generally
available.

Extrapolations from animal data do not generally suffer
from lack of data.  More often, the problem evolves from
several sets of data, one or more of which is anomalous
and thereby casts uncertainty on human extrapolations,
In addition, animals respond differently to doses of toxic
substances administered by different dose injection routes.
Thus, the results are dependent upon whether a dose was ad-
ministered orally, intraperitoneally, intramuscularly,  cuta-
neously, or via the respiratory route.  This represents no
unusual difficulty for an experiment designed specifically
for use in extrapolating a result to humans.  However,  if
attempt is made to infer human effects from odd bits of
animal data which have been reported in many places, the
question of dose route frequently arises and cannot be
answered.l

Ecological Impact

Much of the ecological data for plants or animals suffers,
to some extent, from the same limitations as described pre-
viously for human effects data.  That is, very little plant
or animal data have been taken in plant or animal natural
habitat as a result of accidents, and when attempted, all
causes and effects are not recorded.  Likewise, extrapola-
tions from one species of plant or animal to another are
uncertain because of frequent anomalies observed in the
available recorded data.

Furthermore, the full impact of hazardous substances on
ecological systems may not be observable in isolated data
on toxic effects to specific species.   Important indirect
or secondary impact may occur to co-inhabitants of a habitat
as a result of exposures to hazardous materials in a natural
environment, as opposed to an experimental laboratory,
These impacts may involve predator and prey relaticr&hips,
                             97

-------
and the entire process of natural selection.  The long-term
result could be new and undesirable environmental balances.1

Time Factors

Adverse effects may occur to all ecological populations,
including humans, as a result of repeated exposures to
sublethal acute dosage of toxic materials, or of contin-
uous exposures to low-level concentrations of hazardous
substances.  Such exposures have produced carcinogenesis
and mutagenesis in animals after extended periods of time.
Similar results have not been observed in humans in equi-
valent times.  Thus, another uncertain measure is added
to the problem of animal extrapolations to humans, and
the difficulty of obtaining definitive long-term cause-
and-effect relationships for humans in industrial or
urban environments is obvious.

Measures of persistence of hazardous substances become an
important adjunct to time factors.  The combination of low-
level exposures and persistent agents can lead to major
hazards in the form of lethal or damaging accumulations of
a substance.  Asbestos and mercury are perhaps the two most
commonly known persistent hazards.  Asbestos accumulates in
humans and can lead to lung cancer after many years of low-
level exposure.  Mercury is known to accumulate in aquatic
species and may lead to serious effects in humans through
a build-up of concentrations in the food chain.  There are
many other compounds which persist in nature and/or accumu-
late in food chains.  Some of these are known or suspected;
others have been observed occasionally but have not been
quantified. l

HAZARDOUS WASTE AND WASTE STREAMS

Identification

There are many substances that can create hazardous condi-
tions, because of a dangerous property of a compound or a
group of compounds composing them.  The extent of the danger
is dependent upon the amounts of the dangerous compound pre-
sent, its dilution by inert substances, and the prO'Ximity
of persons or things that may be harmed by the conditions
created by the compound.
                             98

-------
The Booz-Allen report1 states that hazardous conditions may
be created by compounds that are radioactive, explosive,
corrosive, toxic, flammable, pathogenic, carcinogenic,
mutagenic, or have other more exotic long-range effects
when their tolerance levels are exceeded.

The safe handling of such compounds is dependent on the
degree of control that can be exercised to isolate the
susceptible population, remove the triggering condition,
or attenuate the effect below the threshold of suscepti-
bility.

The identification of hazardous waste streams is not simple:
the existence of a dangerous substance must be shown; the
concentration of this substance above the level of normal
susceptibility must be provable; and actual damage to a
susceptible population must have occurred.  In the absence
of these proofs, the violation of a specific standard must
be shown.

The variety of waste streams with potential hazardous ef-
fects is nearly infinite.  The producers of a single product
may use materials or processes that may create hazardous con-
ditions when their products and/or process wastes are added
to those of others.  If the variety of products and pro-
cesses increases, the probability of creating hazardous
waste effects is likely to increase.

Only a plant-by-plant and well-by-well evaluation that has
the full cooperation and technical participation of the
operators  can establish the actual hazards that exist in
all waste  streams now being injected into deep-well systems.

Data shown by the Booz-Allen1 and TRW2 reports and the in-
formation  gathered for this report shows a wide diversity
of wastes  among the industries using deep-well systems to
inject their plant effluent.  Specific identification of
hazardous  wastes in any waste stream or for any particular
industrial group will require a research effort that is
beyond the scope of this study.

Evaluation Problems

In the absence of detailed data on the characteristics of
                              99

-------
waste streams being injected into deep-wells; only crude
evaluations can be made as to how hazardous they may be,
as little information is published concerning the hazardous
waste streams which are produced.  Conjecture as to their
composition and characteristics is based on the hazardous
characteristics of "pure" compounds produced and used in
industry, and in the commercial and household sectors.

An evaluation system that rates the effectiveness of current
hazardous waste handling, treatment and disposal practices
must deal with several interrelated problems:

     does a hazardous waste condition exist?

     what is the condition and how serious?

     what steps have been taken to minimize the hazards?

     how effective are these actions?

     what additional steps are necessary?

If answers to these questions can be obtained, the rating
system will be able to identify the degree to which a hazard
exists, and evaluate the actions needed to adequately con-
trol the handling and disposal of hazardous wastes.

The identification of wastes which create hazardous condi-
tions is a complex task.  The constant factor is the material
that creates the hazardous effect.  The location where the
waste occurs will determine who or what is threatened and
the mitigating effects of fortuitous neutralization or dilu-
tion.  The key to the identification of a hazardous waste
condition is the determination that a potentially hazardous
material is present in the waste stream in amounts that ex-
ceed the tolerance levels of the threatened population or
materials.

Analysis of the waste stream to establish its hazardous
properties is rather easy for radioactive, corrosive or
flammable materials, but is more difficult if the signifi-
cant hazard is pathogenic or toxic.
                             100

-------
An alternative to on-site analysis is knowledge of the
characteristics of the chemical components that compose
the waste stream or that may enter the waste stream.
When toxic materials are present, the possibility that
hazardous waste conditions exist must be assumed.

Evaluation of raw materials used in the production pro-
cess, the production processes used, and the by-product
materials expected, can establish a list of potential
constituents of the waste streams.  Comparison of such
compounds with a comprehensive list of toxic materials
will identify the hazardous potential of the waste stream
and aid in selecting the analytical techniques which can
best verify initial assumptions as to hazard potential.

Characteristics

In waste streams from chemical processing, conditions of
temperature and pressure modify the physical character-
istics of chemical compounds and may convert solids into
liquids and gases, liquids into gases, or mixtures of liq-
uids into solids.  Side reactions of compounds may produce
unwanted waste by-products.  Unless the specific conditions
and reactants are known, the content and condition of the
waste stream is indeterminate.  Compounds which are indi-
vidually inert, corrosive, flammable, explosive, or toxic
under normal conditions, may react with other components
and become relatively less dangerous or may be converted
from a nonhazardous state to one of substantial hazard.

POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS WASTE BEING INJECTED

Based upon toxicological data, degradability, persistence,
solubility in water, potential reactions, corrosiveness,
and environmental effect, a tentative list of chemicals
which might be considered unsafe for deep-well injection
has been made.  Chemicals with harmful potentials considered
to be limited only to formation plugging and/or corrosion
of down-hole and surface equipment are not included on the
list.  The problems these excluded chemicals create can
usually be dealt with and solved as an integral function
of the operating plan of any particular deep-well system.

Those chemicals regarded as potentially unsafe for deep-
well injection are:
                             101

-------
                acrolein

                arsenic and arsenic compounds

                cadmium and cadmium compounds

                carbon disulfide

                cyanides

                diazinon and other pesticides

                fluorides

                hydrofluoric acid

                hydrocyannic acid

                hexavalent chromium compounds

                mercury and mercury compounds

                nitrobenzene

                nitrophenol

All of the chemicals listed as potentially hazardous for
deep-well injection have very high human and ecological
hazard ratings in the Booz-Allen reports.1  Long storage
time is necessary for all of the organic chemicals.  They
either do not degrade or have a long persistence time and
would, therefore, pose a long-term potential hazard to
underground water supplies.  The actual persistence time
is not generally available except for some rough estimates
for a few pesticide compounds.  Some of the pesticides
with known long persistence times are:  DDD, DDT, lindane
and the polychlorocyclodienes.  Dinitrocresol is one of
the insecticides for which no persistence data is available,
Chlordane, the organophosphorus insecticides, and those
listed above are among the group not recommended for deep-
well disposal by the National Working Group on Insecti-
cides .2

The inorganic compounds may react to form less toxic chem-
icals but the toxic element or radical remains, and may be
                             102

-------
converted back to the more toxic form.  An example is hydro-
gen cyanide being converted to a salt and then upon acidifi-
cation being converted back to hydrogen cyanide.  Arsenic
and fluoride are lethal to all forms of life including
plants.  Cadmium and mercury are toxic to aquatic life.
Mercury and organic mercury compounds may be converted by
anaerobic microorganisms to the more toxic methyl mercury.

Except for metallic cadmium and nitrobenzene, all of the
chemicals listed have sufficient water solubility properties
to be dissolved in underground reservoir waters and thence
transported into other zones if communication exists between
the host reservoir and the other zones.

Wells Injecting Hazardous Waste

Of the 383 wells permitted, 209 were operating at the time
the data were collected for this report.  There were 53 of
these operating wells injecting one or more of the chemicals
deemed potentially hazardous for deep-well injection.  Known
waste chemicals being injected, and the known operating data
of deep-wells are shown in Appendix D, Inventory of Deep-
Wells.

Environmental Implications

Assessing the implications of injecting potentially hazard-
ous wastes into subsurface reservoirs has been a chronic
dilemma confronting industry, legislators, and regulatory
agencies of government since the deep-well method of waste
management began.

Inasmuch as no specific illnesses or deaths are noted and
documented as resulting directly from injected hazardous
waste, there can be no cause and result conclusion drawn
nor a definitive statement made relating the two.  Much
needs to be learned of the reactive characteristics of
many of the substances composing the industrial waste
streams when they are subjected to highly varied and
great ranges of injections and  storage conditions be-
fore a definitive statement can be made as to the effects
they may have.  Precise periodic analysis of each waste
stream is necessary to determine what the reaction may be;
a generalized list of components, which is often the only
available data, is insufficient.
                            103

-------
When a great variety of potentially hazardous wastes having
components in concentrations greater than those adjudged
acceptable by standard ratings are injected into a subsur-
face reservoir, a potentially hazardous situation must be
assumed to exist.  However, wastes should be designated as
hazardous on the basis of properties of the waste stream as
an entity rather than according to the properties of indi-
vidual components.  Also it must be assumed, until confirmed
otherwise, that only waste containing hazardous or toxic
components is hazardous.  Developing these assumptions, it
must be concluded that these substances may (1) render un-
usable aquifers of potable water and salaquifers, (2) con-
taminate mineral deposits,  (3) produce mildly toxic to
lethal effects upon human and animal life, and  (4) retard
or completely destroy plant life.

Table 3 which appears in the assessment division of Section
I is an assessment summary of operating deep-wells.  The
table also indicates the intraformational reaction, in terms
of unfavorable and not unfavorable, to the injected waste
stream.  Appendix C lists the individual chemicals being
injected into deep-wells as of the date of this report with
their characteristics.

WASTES OF UNKNOWN HAZARD POTENTIAL BEING INJECTED

Brine

Generally, brine injected into salaquifers would not be
considered hazardous.  However, if it should migrate from
the confining salaquifer into potable water aquifers, it
could render them unfit as a source of drinking water.
Brine escaping to the surface may have a deleterious effect
upon aquatic and plant life.  The effects usually can be
reversed within a relatively short time once the brine flow
is stopped.  Although higher animals have a remarkable tol-
erence for waters with relatively high salinities, and can
be maintained on these for long periods without harmful ef-
fects, they will always seek fresher water, drinking brine
contaminated water only as a last, resort.

More often brine contamination of fresh water aquifers will
have more lasting deleterious effects than brine escaping
                             104

-------
to the surface of the ground.  Once contaminated an aquifer,
especially if confined, is extremely difficult to purge.

Sewage

Treated sewage usually is considered an innocuous fluid to
inject into subsurface reservoirs.  However, very little
is known about the length of time some bacteria and virus
can remain alive and dormant outside a host.  Therefore,
sewage injected into deep-wells should be considered a
latent health problem if it leaves the confines of the
host reservoir.  The question of dormant virus is also
noted in Appendix F  Recent Microbiological Research.


VOLUME OF WASTE

In 1968, the total volume of industrial waste water dis-
charged in the United States was in excess of 54 billion
m3 (14 trillion gallons).  Only 16.2 billion m3 (4.3 tril-
lion gallons) of this was treated before discharge.  Four
major industries discharge more than half of this volume.
These four groups are the primary metals industry, chemi-
cals and allied products, paper and allied products, and
petroleum and coal products.  The volume of waste discharged
by various industries in 1968 and the volume untreated
prior to discharge was:3

                      Total                  Untreated
               Billion    Trillion      Billion    Trillion
Industry          it\3        Gals.          m3        Gals.

Chemicals        15.8        4.2          13.2        3.5

Food              3.0        0.8           2.5        0.6

Paper             7.6        2.0           4.5        1.2

Petroleum         4.5        1.2           1.1        0.3

Primary
  Metals         17.4        4.6          12.1        3.2

Others            5.7        1.5           4.5        1.2
                             105

-------
The volume of industrial waste water discharged by each
EPA geographic region during the same period was:3
Region

 I

 II

 III

 IV

 V

 VI

 VII

 VIII

 IX

 X
     Total
  Number of
Establishments

       711

       958

     1 103

     1 490

     2 731

       752

       476

       156

       654

       371

     9 402
Discharge
Billions
Billions of
of m^ Gallons
2.1
3.4
1.1.3
6.7
15.0
10.3
1.0
0.4
1.6
2.1
54.0
563.1
910.4
2 990.5
1 770.9
3 976.7
2 714.4
254.2
116.3
422.1
557.4
14 276.0
Of the total volume of waste water being discharged from
industry, in excess of 114 000 m^ (30 million gallons) per
day is being injected into disposal wells.1*  This is in ex-
cess of 42 million m3 (11 billion gallons)  per year and rep-
resents approximately 0.08 percent of the total waste dis-
charge.  The largest number of wells is in the gulf coast
area of EPA Region VI, primarily in Texas and Louisiana.
Of the 209 wells operating in the United States, 57 are
in Texas and 52 in Louisiana.
                            106

-------
                        SECTION  IV

                      REFERENCES CITED
1.  Booz-Allen - Applied Research, Inc., Hazardous Waste
    Materials Hazardous Effects and Disposal Methods, U. S.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Contract No. 68-03-0032,
    Vol. 1, 407 pp, 1973.

2.  Ottinger, R. S. , et al,. Recommended Methods of Reduction
    Neutralization, Recovery or Disposal of Hazardous Waste,
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-670/2/73-053-
    a-p, 16 Vols., 3568 pp, 1973.

3.  Mackenthun, K. M.,  Magnitude of Wastewater Treatment and
    Disposal Problem Facing the Nation, Amer. Ass. Petrol.
    Geol.,  Mem. 18, pp 19-23, 1972.

4.  Donaldson, E. C., Injection Wells and Operations Today,
    Amer. Ass. Petrol.  Geol., Mem. 18, pp 24-45, 1972.
                             107

-------
                        SECTION V

            WELL INVENTORY AND CASE HISTORIES
The inventory of deep-wells used for the injection of indus-
trial waste in the United States was updated to January 1975
for this report.

NUMBER OF WELLS

A total of 383 wells were found to have been permitted; an
increase of 50 wells over the last inventory completed in
1973.  Data indicate that 322 of these wells were drilled
and that 209 are operating.  Tables 9 and 10 show a more
complete recapitulation of the number and status of the
wells by EPA regions and by states.

In Texas, five wells permitted and previously uncounted were
drawn into the inventory.  These wells were originally mul-
tiple requests on single applications and multiple permits
to drill were granted under single permit numbers.  Permits
for eight wells were issued on three permits; two each on
two permits (TX-11, TX-112), and four on one permit (TX-4).
Because of lack of specific data on their present status,
these additional six wells are tentatively being carried
under status unknown in the tables.  One well not carried
by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board was added to the
Oklahoma inventory.  It is OK-15 which received a drilling
permit from the U. S. Department of the Interior, Osage
Agency.

It is possible that there are other wells similar to these
six wells just indicated, that may have been missed in this
inventory as well as in previous inventories.

WELL STATUS AND DATA

More detailed information on individual wells than is
summarized in Tables 9 and 10 is included in Appendix
D.  The Appendix is sectionalized by EPA regions, and
                             108

-------
              Table 9.   PERMIT STATUS OF INJECTION WELLS
    AREA
TOTAL NO.WELLS
  PERMITTED
PDR
PDC  POP  PNC  PND  DAP  AFP
Region II
NEW YORK
Region III
PENNSYLVANIA
WEST VIRGINIA
Region IV
ALABAMA
FLORIDA
KENTUCKY
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
Region V
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
OHIO
Region VI
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
NEW MEXICO
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
Region VII
IOWA
KANSAS
Region VIII
COLORADO
WYOMING
Region IX
CALIFORNIA
HAWAII
NEVADA

4

9
"5
/

5
10
3
2
4
4

8
13
34
10

1
85
1
15
124

1
30

2
1

5
4
1

121

9
7

5
7 3
2 1
1 1
4
3 1

511 1
13
28 5 1
81 1

1
58 7 1 19
1
13 1 1
82 4 12 17 8 1

1
30

1 1
1

5
3 1
1
TOTAL
    383
                                277
       5  43   18   35    2    0    3
KEY:
    PDR   Permitted, Drilled                 AFP
    PDC   Permitted, Drilled, Cancelled      SNA
    PDF   Permitted, Drilled, Plugged
    PNC   Permitted, Not Drilled, Permit Cancelled
    PND   Permitted, Not Drilled
    DAP   Drilled, Applying for Permit
                                   Applying For Permit
                                   Status Unknown
                                   109

-------
Table 10.  OPERATING STATUS OF INJECTION WELLS
AREA TOTAL
Region II
NEW YORK
Region III
PENNSYLVANIA
WEST VIRGINIA
Region IV
ALABAMA
FLORIDA
KENTUCKY
MISSISSIPPI
NORTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
Region V
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
MICHIGAN
OHIO
Region VI
ARKANSAS
LOUISIANA
NEW MEXICO
OKLAHOMA
TEXAS
Region VII
IOWA
KANSAS
Region VIII
COLORADO
WYOMING
Region IX
CALIFORNIA
HAWAII
NEVADA
TOTAL
KEY::
0 Operating
NOP Not Operating,
NOUP Not Operating,
DN Drilled, Never
PND Permitted, Not
NO. WELLS

4

9
7

5
10
3
2
4
4

8
13
34
10

1
85
1
15
124

1
30

2
1

5
4
1
383


Plugged
Unplugged
Used
Drilled
PC Permit Cancelled, Never
SNA Status Unknown

0 NOP

1

0 9
6

2
4 1
2 1
1
1
2

4
11
21 4
6 1

1
52 8
1
10
57 12


21

1
1

4
1
1
209 38






Drilled

NOUP







1



1

1
1
3





1
6


2

1


1


18








DN

3


1

3
1


3
1

1
1
5
3


5

4
16

1
7





2

57








PND PC SNA







3

1



1 1

1



19 1


8 18 7








1

34 19 8








                      110

-------
states included within a given region are listed alphabet-
ically.  The waste injection wells are indexed numerically,
regardless of operating status under the respective states.

The well indexing and state codes used by Warner1  and
Wapora2  are continued in this report.  It was believed that
by continuing with the same indexing code it would be easier
to relate the data of this inventory to those data of earlier
inventories.  Also, on each well inventory sheet, a note has
been made identifying that particular well to its index num-
ber in an earlier inventory if there is a difference.

Updating for this inventory was done by summarizing the in-
ventory data previously published, verifying the data, when
needed, with the state agency involved, and gathering new
data from the proper state agency or agencies by telephone
or visitation.

Much of the previous inventory data upon which assessments
were to be made were found to be inadequate, particularly
in Louisiana and Texas.  Additional data were gathered from
the regulatory agencies in these states and appear in this
inventory.  These additional data aided greatly in assessing
the deep-well systems now operating.  One particularly re-
warding group of data were the spot locations of most of the
wells in Texas and Louisiana, which were plotted and appear
in this inventory.  Much information relating to well com-
pletion and equipment could not be included because of time
for preparation and the extensive drafting involved.

PROJECTED GROWTH OF DEEP-WELL SYSTEMS

Table 11 is an industrial growth index developed from pub-
lished information. 3 '"*  This table is used as a basis to
forecast the increase in the use of deep-well injection
systems as a means of waste management.  Table 12 fore-
casting the number of wells to be drilled and Table 13
forecasting the number of wells to be operating during
the periods indicated until 1985.  The forecast tables are
based on existing State and Federal regulations relating
to deep-well injection of industrial wastes and do not re-
flect any new policies or ideas.
                             Ill

-------
     Table 11.  INDUSTRIAL INDEX BASED ON PREDICAST
                      (Index Year 1973 = 100)
SIC Industry                       1974   1975   1980   1985
Mining

  10  Metal Mining                   99    105    136    154
  12  Coal                          107    113    137    155
  13  Oil & Gas Extraction          100    102    115    126
  14  Non-Metallic                  100    103    125    146
Manufacturing

  20  Food                          111    122    153    183
  26  Paper                         137    150    164    210
  2.8  Chemical & Allied             121    134    156    200
  29  Petroleum Refining            138    156    189    244
  32  Stone & Concrete              107    114    128    184
  33  Primary Metals                130    149    163    211
  34  Fabricated Metals             113    120    155    208
  35  Machinery - Except Elect.     121    137    170    234
  36  Electronics                   107    120    158    225
  38  Photographies                 116    126    179    242
Transportation, Gas,
& Sanitary Services

  47  Transportation Service        100    100    109    113
  49  Sanitary Service              102    119    186    271
  50  Wholesale Trade - Durable     102    104    113    120
  55  Auto Dealers & Service         94     96     97     98
Other

  72  Personal Services             109    121    175    246
                             112

-------
 Table 12.  DRILLED INDUSTRIAL  WASTE  STORAGE WELLS FORECAST




                 THROUGH  1985 BASED ON PREDICAST INDEX
SIC

Well
Count
1973
Forecast Total Wells
1974
1975
1980
1985
Mining
10
12
13
14
Metal Mining
Coal
Oil & Gas
Non-Metallic
2
1
17
5
2
1
17
5
2
1
17
5
2
1
20
6
3
1
21
7
Manufacturing
20
26
28
29
32
33
34
35
36
38
Food
Paper
Chemical & Allied
Petroleum Refining
Stone & Concrete
Primary Metals
Fabricated Metals
Machinery-Except Elect.
Electronics
Photographies
6
3
131
51
1
16
3
1
1
3
7
4
158
70
1
20
3
1
1
3
7
5
176
80
1
24
4
1
1
4
9
5
204
96
1
26
5
2
2
5
11
6
262
124
2
34
6
2
2
7
Transportation, Gas,
& Sanitary Service
47
49
50
55
Transportation Service
Sanitary Service
Wholesale Trade-Durable
Auto Dealers & Service
1
23
1
1
1
25
1
1
1
27
1
1
1
43
I
1
1
62
1
1
Other
  72  Personal Service
        Total                   268     322    359    432    555
                             113

-------
Table 13.  OPERATING INDUSTRIAL WASTE STORAGE WELLS FORECAST





                 THROUGH 1985 BASED ON PREDICAST INDEX
Well
Count
SIC
1973
Forecast Operating
1974
1975
1980
Wells
1985
Mining




10
12
13
14
Metal Mining
Coal
Oil & Gas
Non-Metallic
1
1
11
3
1
1
11
3
1
1
11
3
1
1
13
4
2
1
14
5
Manu f ac tur in g










20
26
28
29
32
33
34
35
36
38
Food
Paper
Chemical & Allied
Petroleum Refining
Stone & Concrete
Primary Metals
Fabricated Metals
Machinery-Except Elect.
Electronics
Photographies
4
2
86
33
1
11
2
1
1
2
5
3
105
46
1
13
2
1
1
2
5
3
117
53
1
16
3
1
1
3
6
3
135
64
1
17
3
1
1
3
7
4
174
82
1
23
4
1
1
5
Transportation, Gas,
&




Sanitary Service
47
49
50
55
Transportation Service
Sanitary Service
Wholesale Trade-Durable
Auto Dealers & Service
1
15
1
1
1
17
1
1
1
18
1
1
1
28
1
1
1
41
1
1
Other
  72  Personal Service
        Total
178
216   241   285   369
                             114

-------
A recapitulation of the various industries using injection
wells as a method of disposal shows the chemical industry
as the largest user, with a predicted 174 operating injec-
tion wells by 1985; representing an estimated growth rate
of 7.3 percent.  The petroleum refining industry is second
with a predicted annual growth rate of 6.2 percent, and a
forecast of having 82 operating waste injection wells by
1985.  The sanitary service industry is third in the number
of injection wells forecast with 41, but it has the highest
predicted annual growth rate with 10.8 percent.

CASE HISTORIES

Selected case histories appear in Appendix E.  Most of these
examples have been chosen to relate to a particular geo-
morphic  province within an EPA region or a state in an at-
tempt to identify successful or unsuccessful deep-well sys-
tems and the reasons as to why they have been successful or
unsuccessful.

Case selection was ultimately determined by the availability
of information.  There are probably many other deep-well
systems which may have made good studies if more information
on them was available.  It is often difficult to get accu-
rate, pertinent data on problem wells even though the asso-
ciated problems are in no way directly related to degreda-
tion of the environment.  Two detailed and well documented
case studies also appear in Appendix F with the microbio-
logical research data.  These two studies are so closely
related to the research investigations that it seemed more
appropriate to include them with the microbiological re-
search material.
                            115

-------
                        SECTION V

                      REFERENCES CITED
1.   Warner,  D.  L. ,  Survey of Industrial Waste Injection
    Wells, Spons.  by U.  S.  Geol.  Surv., 2036 pp,  1973.

2.   WAPORA,  Inc.,  Compilation of  Industrial and Municipal
    Injection Wells in the  United States,  EPA-52019-74-020,
    U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.,
    1350 pp, 1974.

3.   Walpert, S. A., Predicast Index,  Predicasts,  Inc.,
    pp  423,  1973-74.

4.   U.  S.  Department of Commerce, U.  S. Industrial Outlook
    1974 (with Projections  to 1980)  U.  S.  Dept. of Comm.,
    385 pp,  1974.
                            116

-------
                        SECTION VI

 RESEARCH PROJECTS RELATED TO DEEP-WELL INJECTION OF WASTE


DEEP-WELL RESEARCH

Government Funded

One hundred and two research projects related to deep-well
injection of waste have been identified.  Those in the U. S.
have been supported in whole or in large part by either
agencies of the Federal, or State Governments; those out-
side the U. S. were completely government funded.  Funding
information was available for 52 of the 102 research pro-
jects and amounts to 4.42 million dollars.  An estimate of
the total government funding is 8 million dollars.  The
number of man years allotted to these projects could not
be obtained.  One additional project related to monitoring
is being conducted by General Electric-TEMPO.  The project
is in its final stages, but no details of the findings or
conclusions have been seen as of the date of this report.

The projects identified in this investigation generally may
be grouped as shown below, and a summary of the research in
each group is included in the text.  A description of indi-
vidual projects is given in Appendix G1, Summary of Research
Related to Deep-Wells.

                                         Number
                                           of
          Type Project                  Projects

          Area Study                       34

          Microbiological                   4

          Chemical                         22

          Engineering                      22

          Geologic-Hydrogeologic            5
                            117

-------
                                         Number
                                           of
          Type Project(contd)            Projects(contd)

          Geophysical                       8

          Monitoring                        2

          Miscellaneous                     1
Area Studies -

Area studies are essential and extremely useful in deter-
mining the feasibility of deep-well injection.  Most of
the studies identified in this group probably can be used
in conjunction with feasibility studies.  The general ten-
dency, however, for area studies is to be generalized and
noncommittal.  Regulatory agencies should have detailed
area studies covering the region over which they have juris-
diction.  These studies should define use and no use areas
and limits under which the deep-well system must operate as
dictated by the hydrogeologic framework.  Except for unusual
circumstances, the preparation of these studies should be
the responsibility of the regulatory agency and the state
government under which it gained its authority.

Microbiological Studies -

The three studies reviewed in this report probably repre-
sent the extent of this research thus far.  This is one
area where a judicious selection of additional research
could aid in an understanding of waste reaction in the
subsurface.  Heretofore this area has been neglected,
except for the work which has been done on bacteriological
action in relation to waterflooding projects for secondary
recovery of oil.

Chemical Studies -

The reactions of any given waste stream, or mixture of
wastes, once introduced into reservoirs of unknown water
and mineral composition, at highly varied temperatures
and pressures are little known and poorly understood.
                             118

-------
Most of the reactions generally shown are for pure sub-
stances rather than the mixtures usually found in waste
streams and so cannot be considered as the reactions which
might be expected from the waste streams.

Nine of the 22 chemical studies relate in some manner to
compatibility of subsurface reservoirs and injected waste
or reactions within the host reservoir.  Studies of these
types are extremely important in developing needed infor-
mation in a sector in which most data are either incomplete
or lacking.  Probably less has been done with waste chem-
istry and waste reaction within host reservoirs than any
other facet of deep-well injection.  This is a high priority
area for study.

Engineering (Reservoir and Geologic) Studies -

The engineering aspects of deep-well injection have been
thoroughly covered in research projects and the literature
to date.  The results of many previous studies which have
been made on oil reservoirs and aquifers may be applied
directly to deep-well injection projects.  The greater por-
tion of the engineering research projects identified during
this study displayed a tendency toward duplication of effort.

Several of these studies were being developed on subjects
about which more knowledge was needed.  There are still many
questions on the subjects of the effect of fluid injection
on fault and joint planes, density stratification, fracture
gradient pressure problems and permeability restoration that
remain to be answered.  However, no recommendation for fu-
ture research can be made until a complete objective evalu-
ation of work done to the present time has been made.

Reservoir modeling is not a prerequisite to the safe opera-
tion of a deep-well system.  With the variables involved
in any given system, the data are essentially historical
throughout most of the operating life of the well.  These
historical data may be gathered from the operating and mon-
itoring records of the system.  What is needed is a predic-
tive tool that can maintain a high degree of reliability
from early in the operating life of the system.
                             119

-------
Geologic-Hydrogeologic Studies -

The geologic aspects of deep-well injection have been well
covered in literature and by research projects.  The con-
trolling criteria for deep-well injection have been defined
and the local geology of most potential well sites is well
enough known to make a firm yes or no decision on injection.
Hydrogeologic studies of salaquifers is a little studied
area, with some exceptions.  Study in this area could be ex-
tremely useful if it were developed toward the objective of
use in the management of deep-well injection systems or for
use in conjunction with waste reaction within salaquifers.
Geophysical Studies -

The use of geophysical methods for monitoring, following
fluid movement, and establishing general reservoir condi-
tions is not highly developed.  Specific studies for down-
hole monitoring tools have the potential for worthwhile
projects in this field.  Some important breakthroughs in
predictive monitoring will occur when methods and tech-
niques are developed to track fluid movement, predict
joint or fracture magnitude and vector, or detect cement
deterioration.

Monitoring Studies -

This is an area in which little has been done, and in which
much needs to be done.  Fluid movement within a reservoir,
fluid escaping and its movement outside the original reser-
voir, and vertical fluid migration are three critical areas
in which monitoring could be improved.  Monitoring, now, is
essentially a matter of retrospect.  Fot it to be fully ef-
fective, there must be a concurrence of recording with fluid
movement and other dynamic forces within the system.  The
ultimate objective is to identify problems related to injec-
tion before they become critical and destroy the integrity
of the injection system or the reservoir.  If deep-well sys-
tems are to remain an acceptable part of the waste manage-
ment scheme, research toward predictive monitoring should
be sanctioned.
                            120

-------
Privately Funded

Only three completely privately funded research projects
related to deep-well waste injection were identified.  One
by the Halliburton Company of Duncan, Oklahoma, one by the
Dow Chemical Company of Midland, Michigan, and one by the
Standard Oil Company of Indiana (now Amoco) Research Labo-
ratory of Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Cement Research Project -

The Halliburton project was the development of a cement,
resistant to chemical waste streams for use in industrial
waste injection wells.2  The successful development of the
cement helped strengthen a vulnerable area of deep-well
completions.  Research on cementing and cementing materials
is continuing.

A summary of the man hours related to the project is not
available, nor is a summary of the total dollars invested
in the project.  A rough estimate of the total dollar
investment including field testing and other items not
directly assigned is between $200,000 and $400,000.

Mic robiqlogica1 Re search Project -

The Dow project3*1*, now in progress, is research on the
bacterial decomposition of specific substances (phenol).
No details, including manhours and expenditures concerning
this project are available at the date of this report.

Corrosion and Water Treatment -

The Standard Oil Company project1 although directed toward
the oil industry may be applied directly to deep-well injec-
tion systems to aid in controlling corrosion;  one of the
major problems associated with the operation of such sys-
tems.  A description of the project is shown under C-13 in
Appendix G.

Research Summary

The good and bad aspects to nearly all phases  of deep-well
injection of industrial waste have been well covered in the
                            121

-------
literature (Appendix A)  and by the research efforts to date
(Appendix G).   Weaknesses in knowledge and understanding
appear in the areas of microbiology, chemistry, and moni-
toring.  These areas offer possibilities for future research.
The total man hours and dollar effort needed for this re-
search cannot be stated as the state-of-the-art is not fully
assessed.

Investigation of deep-well-related research by industry
essentially has been nil.  Those industries using deep-
well injection for their effluent have adopted proven
water well and oilfield techniques, and have relied upon
the experience of service companies or their own expertise
for the system design, construction, and operation.1'2'1*'5
Research generally is limited to solving a particular prob-
lem for a particular well when this problem begins to inter-
fere with the operation of the well.

TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE RESEARCH

One hundred and eighty-two research projects related to
the treatment of hazardous waste have been identified.
All except 14 have received government funding, U. S. or
foreign.  Information on the funding was available for
61 of the 182 projects and amounts to 7.55 million dol-
lars.  An estimate of the total dollar amount is 20 million
dollars.  Table 35 shown in Appendix H summarizes the pro-
jects.

No recommendations for additional research for waste treat-
ment and handling can be made at this time.  Over all the
methods and techniques presently accepted are proven and
are relatively safe.  However, it is suggested that these
methods be reviewed periodically to see if improvements can
be made and that the methods are adequate for all conditions.
                             122

-------
                          SECTION VI

                       REFERENCES CITED
1.  Smithsonian Science Information Exchange, 1730 M Street
    N. W.,  Washington, D. C. ,  1974.

2.  W. F. Hower, Halliburton  Services Research Center,
    Duncan, Oklahoma, Personal Communication, 1974.

3.  J. A. Leenheer, U.S.G.S.  Denver, Colorado, Personal
    Communication, 1974.

4.  J. S. Talbot, Dow Chemical Company,  Houston, Texas,
    Personal Communication, 1974.

5.  A. C. Barlow, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,
    Wilmington, Delaware, Personal Communication, 1974.
                            123

-------
                         SECTION VII

               ECONOMICS OF DEEP-WELL SYSTEMS1'2'3


Several factors determine the economics of a deep-well sys-
tem.  The major factors are:

           1.  depth to candidate horizon

           2.  proposed rate of injection

           3.  preinjection treatment required

           4.  formation injectivity

           5.  power costs

           6.  labor costs

           7.  contract drilling costs

Each factor contributes its part to the overall economic
pattern, but all factors do not have the same weight in
different parts of the United States.  In one part of
the United States drilling costs may be low and labor
costs quite high.  In another part of the United States
drilling costs may be high, labor costs high and some
other cost factor low.  Because of the diverse weighting
of these economic factors and the rapidly changing prices
for services and materials, relative cost factors have
been developed rather than absolute costs, which would
be meaningless for any situation other than the one for
which they are developed.  These factors included in the
economic discussion are not weighted to reflect any bene-
ficial or detrimental effects upon the environment.

COST FACTOR COMPARISON

Figure 12 illustrates the relative cost of a well drilled
in the United States as a function of  depth.   As an
illustration, a well 2 500 feet in depth would cost one
                            124

-------
  TT
I   T
         J
                                       CO
                                       o
                                       O
                                       0)
 _      o
TT^ w
                                                     00
                                                     
                                                                     D
                                                                     t_
                                                                     0)
                                                          r\i

                                                           0)
                                                           L.
                                                           =1
                                                           o»
Off) 00 N  «Ł)  If)
                       IO
                               125

-------
unit while a well of approximately 9,800 feet would cost 2
units.  Figure 13 is a drilling cost index map of the United
States.  In this illustration, costs in the Appalachian basin
of the eastern United States are 100 and all other regions of
the United States then are related to the Appalachian basin.
                    .5—-E._	
    Figure 13.  Relative cost index of oil & gas wells
This  cost  index  cannot be applied without reservation be-
cause there  are  geological variations within states which
can materially affect the drilling costs from one part  of
the state  to another.  These  figures are, however, reason-
able  indices for first approximation purposes.   Conditioning
plant costs  as a function of  throughput are illustrated in
Figure  14.   There are four possible alternatives in injec-
tion  plants, and these are:   no  treatment or filtration;
filtration without treatment;  treatment without  filtration;
and combined treatment and filtration.  The required  treat-
ment  will  materially affect the  cost of the conditioning
                             126

-------
IWjUUU



i nnn
1 UwU
*~
E
ID



c
o
'~ inn
«*•• i \j\j
o
o>

c



••—
(0
o
Oin
iw



1
^
-x
. X
X
^X Nx
\\
= \v
: \
N



















	 Floe





x
X
^
s. x
\ X
\ x
\ x
\^ X

^V v













culation No Filt















x
x
X
S. x
X. x
N. X
X^ x

^V v
^^ .


•ation
	 Filtration No Flocculation
1 1 Mill)
i i i i i i n
-


_

-




"~



-
—

—
~
-





x -
N



                       10
100
1000 2000
                       Injection  Rate
    Figure 14.  Relative cost  for  conditioning plants
plant and these cost variations with  capacity  are  illus-
trated .

Relative conditioning costs as a  function  of injection
volume are shown in Figure  15 considering  filtration  with-
out flocculation and flocculation without  filtration.  In
the lower ranges of injection there is very little differ-
ence in cost, but as the throughput increases  there is
considerable separation between the two  illustrated modes
of conditioning.
                            127

-------
   1,000
    100
  0)
  Q.
  O
  o
     10
               III
                    I  I I I 11II
                               I I  I I I 111
Filtrotion, no  Flocculation
                            Flocculation, no Filtration
                               I I  I I i 111
                                                    I  l I I fiII
                 10
                           too
                                     1,000
         topoo
100,000
                             Volume
         Figure  15.   Relative conditioning cost

METHOD COST COMPARISON1'2

A comparison of  deep-well  injection with incineration  and
wet oxidation is  shown  in  Figure 16.  The cost of  injection
for disposal is  plotted as a function of throughput  for
various concentrations  and injection depths.  In this  illu-
stration the economic superiority of deep-well systems over
incineration and wet oxidation systems is clearly  shown.1

A factor in these comparisons which has not been given ade-
quate consideration  is  the cost of fuel and its availability
for incineration and wet oxidation.  Both of these methods
require the addition of heat to sustain the process.   In
both wet oxidation and  incineration, a concentrated  liquid
or solid "ash" remains  after the completion of the process.
Various schemes  are  considered for disposal of the residue
and are included in  the cost.  However, problems associated
with disposal of the residue are often of equal or greater
magnitude than those of the original waste.
                             128

-------
   l.OOOrr
    100
O
o
o>
>
^J
cr
     10
             l	I II IN
                        Without  Conditioning
                        I  I  i I  l I 11 I    l   l i l  i..PiT
                                               Incineration
                                                300,000
                                               Wet  Oxidation
                                                    I80,000ppm
                                               injection 6.2x10® PeC
                                                  OOOpsi)
                    10            100           1,000

                Relative   Disposal  Quantity
                                                         10,000
         Figure  16.   Unit disposal  costs  compared

The assumption  is made for the economic  analysis that an
adequately  isolated horizon of sufficient injection capa-
city exists.  In an area where there  is  little information
available concerning the candidate  horizons,  there is an
economic hazard  in proposing a deep-well  system because
adequate injectivity and/or isolation might not exist for
it.  In such  a  case the investment  in a  deep-well system
will be lost  and an alternate system  must be used.

In areas where  information is marginal,  a test well prob-
ably should be  drilled before a final commitment to the
deep-well system is made.  If the conditions  are favorable,
the test well can be utilized for injection and there is
no loss other than the cost of the  delay.   If the test
well proves the  deep-well prospects are  bad,  then the
loss is limited  to the cost of the  test  well.
                             129

-------
COST EXAMPLES

Investigations by Wright3  in  1969,  showed the economic ad-
vantages of deep-well  systems over  other methods of indus-
trial waste disposal.  Tables 14  and 15 show costs for the
year 1969 in the Great Lakes  (GL),  Mid-Continent (MC), and
Gulf Coast  (GC) areas.   Although  the exact dollar figures
are no longer valid, the relationship between items has
remained at a relatively consistent ratio.  With the  appli-
cation of an acceptable  average yearly inflation factor,
the figures presented  in Tables 14  and 15 should closely
approximate present  costs.

Figure 17 illustrates  total cost  of injection for three
injection pressures  and  three rates of injection as a
function of depth.
               10,000
               1,000
              s
              U  100
              Ł
                     900,
                       ^   (p«')
                               900	'•
                 0246

                          D«pth
                                      ioo,ooo
                                       2 -
                                      •^'million
                                  IO   12   14
             Figure  17.   Cost of injection
                             130

-------



EH
Ł5
JVj
§
EH
rtj
8
EH
W
U
H
co

W
3:
I
Hi
W
W
Q

fa
0

0
CO
H
04
icŁ
&
*>*
O
u

u
H
s
o

o
u
W

^'
rH

CD
H
•8
EH




g
CD
CO -P
>t iTi CO
rH C >,
rH -H CO
rd >
(D rd rH
>H CO rH
QJ
IS


^
rfl
0)

x^
-p
CO
o
CJ
01
C
•rH
-P
rd
^_i
CD
04
O
-P

U CD
rd g
<4-t -P
M rd
3 (U
CO M
EH



g
rH CD
rH -P
CD CO
IS !>i
CO










rH
-P
•r-t
O.
rd
O






•p
0) C
U CD
rd g
MH -p
M rd
3 CD
EH




g
rH CD
rH -P
Q) CO
IS >1
CO



-P
fl
rd
iH
CM
rd
(1)





o
o
o
«.
0
0
rH
•10-


0
o
o
•.
0
CN
.
in
CN
CN
•to-




rij



Q__)
s




H
J>




O
O
o
^
^D
CN
rH




O
O
o
•»
00
r-
•H



O
O
O
«.
CN
in





o
o
o
«•.
o
"I1
•H




0
O
0
«.
o
0
OO





m



u
o




H
J>




o
o
o
^
oo
oo
oo




o
o
0
k
in
<7i
oo



o
o
o
••
CN
i-D





O
O
O
•.
O
in
CN
H



O
O
O
«.
CO
U3
^





U



t— 1
u





J>




o
o
o
^
0
o
in




0
o
o
•.
o
o
^



o
o
o
«.
o
0
rH



•H
O
o
o
^
o
o
in
H



O
0
o
K
o
r-»
CN





Q



1-3
O





J>









































•c
CD
rd
g
•rH
-P
CO
CD

-p
CO
o
o

e
OJ
-P
w
t*i
tn
•i.
0
•rH
-P
rd
rH
CD
•rH
U
a
H
*











EH
CO
o
u
o
*z*
H
EH
oi
W
CU
O
W
o
r^
1
>H
EH
H
,_^|
H
U

rH -* 0
rH 00






f 	 ^ f 	 , ^ 	 ^
00 CN O
CN 00 CT>
VO VD VŁ)

kŁ> OO H
oo in us
CN CN CN
. . .




CT* CT> CN
• f •
in "^ oo
rH 0 00
in CN CN
— ' « — —

VD
in r~ r~
en t^- o
• • •
iH H







o m ^
rH rH




rJ U CJ
a s o



H
H H H
Ł> [> Ł> [>

tO


















































rd
-P
rd
'O
CD
1 — 1
•9
•H
•rH
rd
^>
rij
*
131

-------
                      SECTION VII

                    REFERENCES CITED
1.   Koenig, L.,  Ultimate Disposal of Advanced Treatment
    Wastes Part  I, Injection,  U.  S.  Public Health Service
    A.W.T.R-8, 999-WP-10, 1964.

2.   Malina, J. F., Jr., and I. C. Moseley, II, "Disposal-
    Well Dimensions; Injection Rates and Cost Responses",
    in Underground Waste Management and Environmental
    Implications, Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Memoir 18,
    pp 102-111,  1972.

3.   Wright, J. L., Disposal Wells - A Worthwhile Risk,
    98th Annual  Meeting AIME  (Wash.  D.C., Feb. 16-20,
    1969)  15 pp.
                            132

-------
                        SECTION VIII

                    LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
Common law constraints consist of the rights of individuals
to take legal action in the event the injection operation
infringes upon their legally protected interests.  Encom-
passed here is the law of torts, which provides remedies for
a variety of civil wrongs.  Of primary concern in tort law
is the distribution of losses between injured parties and
those responsible for the injury in accordance with some
concept of social justice.  Tort law also provides the
remedy of injunctive relief under certain conditions, but
the role of the injunction is likely to be diminished in
an area subject to administrative regulation.

In the case of injection wells, administrative controls are
intended to prevent injury to other parties, but, in the
event that injury does occur, the injured party can seek
compensation under one of several tort theories, including
nuisance, negligence, strict liability, and trespass.  In
general, nuisance encompasses actions which interfere with
the enjoyment of property and is based to a large extent on
the inherent nature of the objectionable activity.  Negli-
gence applies to actions causing injury as a result of fail-
ure to employ a reasonable standard of care in conducting a
given activity.  The concept of strict liability or liability
without fault is usually associated with activities having
a relatively high potential for injury even when conducted
with the best of care, and serves to transfer losses auto-
matically to the party in control of the activity without
regard to actual fault.   The concept of trespass is gener-
ally used to protect exclusive property rights and therefore
is applicable in cases of unauthorized entry onto land
(Prosser, 1971).1]2  There is one more principle of tort law
which has wide application.  It is a concept developed by a
Harvard professor (Keeton, 1959)  known as the rule of condi-
tional fault.  The reasoning in this instance is that an ac-
tivity may be desirable even though it entails the possibil-
ities of harmful consequences and therefore it should not be
labeled a tort - if the actor pays for the damage.  Here we
see that the tort is not in the conduct but in not paying.2

                             133

-------
"Since the choice of a legal basis of action is somewhat
dependent on the nature of the injury,, it is necessary
to give separate consideration to the types of injury
that are likely to occur.  The most probable detrimental
consequence of injection is the contamination or destruc-
tion of natural resources.  The underlying concept of
deep-well disposal is confinement of the waste material
to strata of low utility, but there is always some possi-
bility of the existence of undiscovered or currently un-
recognized resources within the disposal zone.  And, of
course, permanent confinement may not be achieved.  The
waste may escape into other strata by such avenues as
faults, abandoned wells or other excavations, or the in-
jection well itself.  Another potential category of in-
jection-related injury includes instability problems
arising from subsurface pressure alterations or other
interference with the structural integrity of underlying
formations.  A third area of possible application of
tort law encompasses situations in which injected materials
invade the underlying space of adjacent landowners without
measurable injury.  The principal issue in such cases is
not compensation for actual damages but rather the pro-
tection of an exclusive interest in property.

"It should be noted that only a very limited number of
court cases concerning damages associated with deep-well
waste disposal has been decided.  Most of the existing
cases concern legal controversies arising from the injec-
tion of salt water for disposal purposes or in connection
with secondary-recovery methods of pe^troleum production.
These cases have addressed some of the potential problems
associated with injection wells but provide no guidance
with respect to others.  It should be noted that law
governing  secondary-recovery operations is strongly in-
fluenced by public policy considerations associated with
its necessity to the petroleum industry, thereby greatly
reducing the transferability of such law to industrial
waste-disposal operations.  The injection of oil-field
brines strictly for disposal purposes is somewhat dis-
tinguishable from the injection of industrial wastes be-
cause the brine is a naturally occurring substcince being
returned to an environment similar to that in which it
originated.  Recognition of this fact is contained in
the. FWPCA Amendments of 1972 in which oil-field brines
                            134

-------
are exempted from the definition of pollutant.  These
limitations on the general applicability of decisions
regarding oil-field waste-disposal practices necessitate
reliance on decisions in related areas in the determin-
ation of legal principles that will serve to resolve
rights conflicts between individuals.  The use of analogy
always has certain inherent weaknesses, but more defini-
tive law does not exist.

"There is a substantial body of law concerning the escape
of deleterious substances in general that gives an indica-
tion as to how conflicts concerning pollution damages from
injected wastes might be resolved.  All the theories of
tort liability have been invoked in pollution cases, but
the majority appear to rely on nuisance and negligence."1

NUISANCE

"Nuisance has been a standard basis for recovery in situa-
tions involving pollution which renders a water supply unfit
for use (Gulf Oil Corp. v. Hughes, 1962; Panther Coal Co. v.
Looney, 1945; Hasten v. Texas Co., 1927; Love v. Nashville
Agricultural and Normal Institute, 1922).  Since nuisance de-
pends on the result of the defendant's actions and not on
the actions themselves, the essential elements in an allega-
tion of nuisance are proof of actual damages and the estab-
lishment of a causal connection between the activity in
question and the injury.  Since direct proof of a causal
relationship between an alleged source of subsurface pollu-
tion and the injury is difficult to obtain, the courts will
often accept proof by inference based on circumstantial evi-
dence.  Factors usually given consideration by the courts in
determining causation include (1) proximity of the suspected
source to the pollution, (2) the existence of other possible
sources, (3) the relationship in time between the pollution
and some act of the defendant, and (4)  the capability of
the suspected source for causing the pollution in question.
The combination of factors necessary to prove causation by
inference varies from case to case depending on the circum-
stances surrounding each situation.  Contamination by the
injected waste itself would likely establish a direct causal
relationship, but proof of causation in injection-related
pollution cases is likely to be complicated by the fact that
                             135

-------
contamination may be caused by naturally occuring fluids
which migrate in response to subsurface pressure increases.
The migration of resident fluids has been a significant
problem in the Port Huron, Michigan, area where industrial
waste injection in Ontario, Canada, was apparently the cause
of seepage of salt water, oil, and natural gas from aban-
doned oil wells.  The situation was further complicated by
the international aspect of the problem, but the fact that
the pollution could not be directly connected with the in-
jected waste was significant.  It was not until a chemical
analysis of the seepage indicated the presence of the in-
jected substance that the Ontario officials took affirma-
tive action to phase out the injection operations respon-
sible."

NEGLIGENCE

"Negligence is also a frequently utilized basis for court
actions concerning pollution problems, but the person seeking
relief is under an increased burden of proof in this situa-
tion,.  In addition to proving damages and causation, the
plaintiff must prove the acts or omissions constituting the
negligence.  Because of the difficulties of proving negli-
gence where the activity in question is located on property
entirely within the defendant's control, some courts have
accepted general proof of negligence in place of the desig-
nation of a precise negligent act  (Sinclair Refining Co. v.
Bennett, 1941; Texas Co. v. Giddings, 1912).  Another ele-
ment of proof in negligence cases is the concept of foresee-
ability.  The principal concern here is whether the defen-
dant could reasonably have anticipated injury as a result
of his actions.  The absence of a reasonable anticipation
of injury in connection with lawful uses of property has
been employed to deny the right of recovery for a variety
of injuries, including groundwater pollution.  The doctrine
has been applied to such activities as the burial of animal
carcasses  (Long v. Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., 1908)
and the location of privies  (Davis v. Atkins, 1896), but
apparently not to more extensive waste disposal operations."

LIABILITY WITHOUT FAULT

"In contrast to this group of cases where the absence of
negligence has shielded the defendant from liability,
                             136

-------
another group of decisions has imposed strict liability
for pollution damages without regard to negligence.  This
doctrine of strict liability has been applied to pollution
cases primarily where potentially harmful substances are
brought onto property and subsequently escape, causing in-
jury to adjacent landowners.  The doctrine has been applied
to the escape of salt water in several states.  In some
cases, the courts have imposed strict liability on the
basis of a common-law concept (Berry v. Shell Petroleum Co.,
1934) first enunciated in an 1866 English case (Fletcher v.
Rylands, 1865), whereas in others the basis has been a
statutory enactment or administrative regulation (Gulf Oil
Corp. v. Alexander, 1956).  This doctrine may become sig-
nificant with respect to future pollution problems which
may be caused by industrial waste injection.  Many of the
wastes involved can be described as hazardous, and the in-
jection process may well be viewed as an unnatural use of
land, for which responsibility for accidental losses should
be borne by the operator even in the absence of fault.  It
should be noted that some 30 states have now accepted the
strict liability concept in certain areas, and the number
appears to be increasing (Prosser, 1971)."

TRESPASS

"Assuming that an injected waste is effectively confined to
the disposal zone so that damages are not inflicted on other
parties, legal confrontations are still possible where the
waste crosses property boundaries and infringes upon under-
lying space of adjacent landowners.  The likelihood of this
occurrence depends on such factors as location of the injec-
tion well with respect to property boundaries, injection
rates, and characteristics of the injection zone.  The cus-
tomary basis for an action to protect the exclusive interest
in property is trespass.  Although the concept of subsurface
trespass has been recognized in cases involving the extrac-
tion of underlying minerals (North Jellico Coal Co. v.
Helton, 1920) , the courts generally have refused to uphold
the trespass concept in cases involving unauthorized entry
into subsurface space in the absence of injury.

"In a 1950 case decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma
(West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n. v. Rosecrans,  1950)
                             137

-------
the plaintiff sought to enjoin injection of salt water on
adjacent property and to obtain damages for alleged tres-
pass in connection with previous infringement of subsurface
property rights.  The plaintiff was requesting recovery of
profits accruing to the defendant because of the alleged
unauthorized use of plaintiff's land; physical damages to
the land, although no specific damages were set out; and
punitive damages for the oppressive disregard of plaintiff's
property rights.  The defendant admitted liability for any
actual damages resulting from the injection but denied that
damages had occurred inasmuch as the injection zone was
saturated with salt water prior to the initiation of injec-
tion.  The court concurred with the contention of the de-
fendant that liability should be limited to actual damages.

"Regarding the allegation of trespass, a principal consider-
ation of the court was whether the salt water remained the
property of the defendant upon its escape to the property of
others.  Had ownership remained with the injector, storage
beneath adjoining land apparently would have constituted
trespass, but the court held that ownership and control were
lost upon escape and that consequently there was no trespass,
In reaching this conclusion concerning the loss of posses-
sion, the court compared the salt water with natural ground-
water and petroleum, which are not necessarily fixed in
position beneath one proprietor's land but are subject to
migration and change of ownership.  The court specifically
noted that the migration of the injected fluid under plain-
tiff's land constituted only a displacement of a similar
resident fluid.  The applicability of this decision to a
case involving an industrial waste not closely comparable
to a natural fluid may therefore be somewhat questionable.
However, a key issue in the case was the absence of actual
injury to the plaintiff.  A change in the nature of the in-
jected fluid may not be significant provided the waste is
confined to a stratum so that no damage is produced.

"A similar decision regarding the subsurface trespass issue
had been handed down by the Supreme Court of Kentucky in
1934 in a case involving the underground storage of natural
gas  (Hammonds v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co., 1934).
The court in that case also held that the injector was not
guilty of trespass since he lost possession of the gas once
                             138

-------
it escaped to the plaintiff's property.  Although the defen-
dant gas company in this case was not found guilty of tres-
pass, the loss of ownership of the injected gas must have
left the company with mixed emotions about the decision.
Other courts  (Lone Star Gas Co. v. Murchison, 1962; White
v. New York State Natural Gas Corp., 1960) have since re-
fused to follow the Kentucky court with respect to the loss-
of-possession issue where natural gas is involved, and this
and other aspects of such underground storage operations are
now regulated by statute in many states.

"Another potentially relevant decision with regard to the
right to control use of subsurface space is a 1931 New York
case (Boehringer v. Montaldo, 1931).  The case did not in-
volve injection but arose from a dispute between the buyer
and seller of property with regard to an undisclosed sewer
line located 150 ft below the surface.  The court held that
the sewer was not an encumbrance on the basis of the view
that a landowner's rights are restricted to a depth of
"useful ownership."  The concept of indefinite ownership
upward and downward was rejected as an unacceptable prin-
ciple of law.

"Representative of an opposing point of view is a 1936
Kentucky case (Edwards v. Lee's Administrator, 1936)  which
supports the right of the landowner to exercise exclusive
control over subsurface space which he cannot put to use
himself.  The owner of land underlain by a portion of a
cave was awarded damages from an adjacent owner, on whose
land the entrance was located, who made commercial use of
the cave.  This decision was reached in spite of the fact
that the plaintiff had no means of access to the cave lo-
cated 360 ft beneath his land.  The primary consideration
appears to have been the fact that the defendant made an
economic use of space theoretically owned by another,
therefore incurring liability for a portion of the profits
accruing from such use.

"The author of a well-known treatise on tort law  (Prosser,
1971) criticizes this holding as bad law and points to the
New York sewer-line case referred to previously as the more
enlightened view, but it does not appear that the issue of
ownership of underground space has been the subject of
enough court decisions to establish a trend of opinion
                            139

-------
effectively.  Of possible relevance is the fact that: the
concept of limiting exclusive property rights to that space
which can be put to effective use has been accepted with
respect to overlying space in recognition of the needs of
aviation.  This restriction of exclusive property rights
has been necessitated by an activity generally recognized
as being in the public interest.  Since the feasible uses
of subsurface space have been more limited, the concept of
public control has not been applied to the same extent.
However, expanding utilization of subsurface space for such
uses as underground storage and waste disposal may require
consideration of property-rights limitations in the down-
ward direction.  A restriction of ownership of subsurface
space appears to be analogous to the restriction of over-
lying rights, provided that freedom of use of such space
is generally held to be in the public interest.  Although
the concept of subsurface injection of wastes is given
limited acceptance at present, there appears to be no
general agreement that widespread use of the underground
for waste disposal is in the public interest.

"In the event that the property rights of the landowner
are held to encompass exclusive control over use of sub-
surface space, the waste injector desiring to utilize
strata underlying the property of another would have to
acquire rights of a nature similar to those obtained for
the underground storage of natural gcis.  In some juris-
dictions, the acquisition of a subsurface lease may have
the effect of reducing the possibility of liability for
accidental damages to the lessor's property resulting
from injection.  For example, in some states, the holder
of a mineral lease is not liable for damages to the lessor
without proof of specific acts of negligence, whereas
strict liability is imposed for damages off the leased
premises (Holbrook v. Continental Oil Co., 1955; Phoenix
v. Graham, 1953)."l

CONDITIONAL FAULT

In explaining conditional fault, Trelease2 poses the
questions arising from the case of Vincent v. Lake Erie
Transportation Co.  (1910).  "A steamship was unloading at
Mr. Vincent's dock when a great storm came up.  The captain
kept his ship tightly tied to the dock, replacing ropes as
                            140

-------
they showed signs of wearing.  He saved the ship, but did
$500 damage to the dock.  The court held that the ship owr>er
had to pay	Did the captain commit a wrong?  Did he in-
tend to harm the dock?  Since he had permission to dock, was
he a trespasser?  Was he negligent?  Wouldn't any reasonable
man similarly situated try to save his ship?  Under the mod-
ern definition of a tort as "socially undesirable conduct",
is it socially undesirable to save a ship?"  Two questions
are evident, should the ship owner pay and what tort has
been committed?

To clarify Trelease's summary of conditional fault and
changing attitudes, two additional cases must be noted.
"The reasonableness of causing the harm is said to depend
upon a balancing process - the act which interferes with
the use and enjoyment of the land is unreasonable unless
the utility of the actor's conduct outweighs the gravity
of the harm (Restatement, 1939a).  As usually stated by
the courts, and in the old Restatement of Torts, the
weighing of utility and harm made it look very much as
though a big and important industry which had both eco-
nomic and social desirability might do dreadful things
to some poor householder as long as the total damage was
small compared with the total good produced by the indus-
try (Restatement, 1939e)....in the case of Pennsylvania
Coal Co. v. Sanderson (1886), it was decided that the
coal company was not liable for polluting a stream by
discharging acid mine water into it, even though it
ruined the stream for domestic and ornamental use and
caused actual damage to the plaintiff of almost $3,000..."

Injunctions are often considered a remedy in pollution
cases, but have always been regarded as something to be
used only under unusual conditions, when the remedy of
damages is inadequate.  The process of "balancing equities"
between the interest of the plaintiff and the needs of the
defendant often occurs at this point.2  Where the defendant
would suffer severe hardship from having his activities
stopped, and the plaintiff would suffer considerably less
if he were given money for being subjected to the nuisance.
the court will deny the injunction and say that the plain-
tiff must be satisfied with damages.  In a recent New York
case,  Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (1970), this theory was
applied in a way which has caused a considerable amount of
                             141

-------
controversy in these days of arising consciousness of
environmental protection.  Property owners surrounding
the cement plant sustained substantial damage from smoke
and dust, but the plant was a multimillion-dollar industry
that formed a major part of the economic base of the com-
munity.  The court found that the pollution was serious
and that the cement company should be encouraged to find
a solution, but nevertheless held that the industry should
not be enjoined.  It seemed fairer to both sides to grant
permanent damages, make the defendant pay the plaintiffs
$185,000 for their loss of property values, and allow the
industry to continue."2

The rule of "conditional fault" (Keeton 1959) reasons that
an activity may be desirable even though it entails the pos-
sibility of harm and therefore should not be considered a
tort if the actor pays for the harm.  "The fault lies not in
the conduct but in not paying."  Referring to Vincent v.
Lake Erie Transportation Co. (1910) Trelease states, "Saving
the ship is desirable conduct, not tortious, but not paying
for the dock is outrageous.  This principle has a fairly
wide application.  Today we hear much of "enterprise liabil-
ity", the idea that industries should pay their own way,
that manufacturers of products should be strictly liable for
the harms those products cause, that "no-fault insurance"
should equalize the burdens of the traffic victims and
spread them over the entire automobile-transportation in-
dustry.  Much of the new concern for the environment is
based on this idea.  The economists have a wonderful phrase
for it - we should "internalize the externalities"; that is,
we should see that all costs of an enterprise are paid by
those who receive its benefits, and not shoved off on out-
siders.

"This is the true principle that seems to govern the law of
underground waste disposal.  The courts have been flexibly
applying any and all of the tort doctrines we have discussed
as long as they produce the result the court wishes to
achieve, which is compensation for the injured person.  When
serious damage occurs, the court may use a theory of tres-
pass, it may find that negligence was present, it may de-
clare the activity to be a nuisance, or it may say the
activity is ultrahazardous.
                            142

-------
"When the Restatement  (Second) of Torts was being drafted
last year, the nuisance rules which seemingly allow the rich
and strong to confiscate the property of the poor and weak
came up for considerable discussion.  It was argued that the
courts had rarely put such a brutal rule into effect.  The
rule on balancing utility against harm was amended to in-
clude this statement:  "The gravity of the harm, as objec-
tively weighed..., may be found so significant that in and
of itself it requires compensation, regardless of the weight
of the utility of the conduct" (Restatement [Second], 1971c).
The Boomer cement case and the Pennsylvania Coal Co. case
were contrasted and the significant fact noted that, al-
though the utility of both industries far outweighed the
harm they did and neither was stopped, the result in the
Boomer case of making the company pay was preferable.

"Both the Boomer case and the new Restatement (Second)
rule are perfect illustrations of conditional fault.  The
cement industry is needed economically, it is socially de-
sirable, and the court is unwilling to stop it.   However,
the $185,000 of property damage is a cost of producing
cement, and the court says, "Pay it".  The cement company
thus is encouraged to use every means possible to keep the
unpleasant side effects of its operation to a minimum,"2

SUMMARY

Legal aspects of deep-well injection are still evolving.
Trelease2 summarizes his evaluation by postulating that
the courts will consider deep-well injection a socially
desirable activity, not per se wrong, not to be discouraged
nor to be stopped, but requiring all industries using the
method to bear all costs when there is a malfunction and
damage or injury occurs.
                             143

-------
                         SECTION VIII

                       REFERENCES CITED
1.  Walker, W.  R.,  and W. E. Cox, Legal and Institutional
    Considerations  of Deep-Well Waste Disposal, 2nd Int.
    AAPG-USGS-IAHS  Underground Waste Manage. & Artificial
    Recharge Symp.  (New Orleans, Sept. 26-30, 1973) pre-
    prints, Vol. 2, pp 3-19, 1973.

2.  Trelease, F. J.,  Liability for Harm from Underground
    Waste Disposal, Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol. Mein.  18,
    pp 369-375, 1972.
                            144

-------
                       SECTION IX

        LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Governmental controls applicable to deep-well injection
are increasing as the use of the method increases.  Now
most states with a multiple number of deep-wells either
have legislated statutes regulating these systems or have
rules established by some agency or agencies of the govern-
ment whose authority has been designated by legislation
and designed to give regulatory authority.

Waste-treatment requirements have not been as exacting for
deep-well injection as for surface discharge.  Critics of
the method regard it as a loophole in environmental quality
control while those supporting deep-well systems insist
that because the waste is removed from the usable (surface)
environment, less treatment is justified.  Proponents also
view use of underground space as an economic resource which
should be utilized when other disposal methods are more
costly.

The need for regulation of deep-well systems is generally
recognized and accepted because of the undesirable results
which may manifest themselves because of poor design or
operating practices.

STATE CONTROLS * - 2

The regulation of deep-well injection has traditionally
been a responsibility of the state.  The characteristics
of the regulatory programs vary widely in both the accep-
tance of the deep-well waste injection concept and the
regulations governing construction and operation of the
systems.  Some states accept deep-well injection as a
feasible alternative or last resort for waste disposal,
others are philosophically opposed to it and probably will
never grant operating permits, and one state has forbidden
it by statute.  Those states accepting the concept of deep-
well injection show great variation in the form, sxibstance,
and administrative organization for the implementation of
the regulations.

                            145

-------
A limited number of states have adopted specific disposal-
well statutes (Texas Water Code, sec.  22.001 et seq;
Michigan Statutes Annotated).   Some states utilize legis-
lation created for purposes other than the control of in-
jection wells.  For example,  North Carolina has a water-well
statue applicable to disposal wells (General Statutes of
North Carolina).   In Ohio, a part of oil and gas law applies
to the injection of industrial wastes  (Ohio Revenue Code,
sec. 1509.01 et seq).  A number of states regulate subsur-
face disposal through use of the pollution-control statute
applicable to surface water.

The wording of the pollution-control statute of several
states specifically encompasses disposal wells (West
Virginia Code; Annotated Code of Maryland; Arizona Revised
Statutes Annotated; Colorado Revised Statutes) , whejreas in
others no explicit reference is made.   Many state pollution-
control laws may reasonably be interpreted to apply to dis-
posal-well operations without specifically including them
as the laws cover discharges of wastes to both surface and
groundwaters.  A question may arise as to whether discharge
of wastes to subsurface saline waters  comes within the
jurisdiction of pollution-control statutes which define
"pollution" in terms of actions having adverse effects on
other uses, inasmuch as such waters may have no other ex-
isting uses.  However, the potential contamination of usable
water in other strata if the waste should migrate from the
disposal zone would likely be sufficient to support the
claim that injection constitutes an activity within the
jurisdiction of pollution-control legislation.

The final regulatory responsibility lies with a single
agency in a number of states whereas,  in certain other
states, the authorization procedure requires the approval
of two or more agencies.  The Texas Disposal Well Act vests
permit-granting authority in the Water Quality Board, but
the permit is conditioned on the certification by the Texas
Railroad Commission that the proposed injection well will
not endanger oil- and gas-bearing strata  (Texas Water Code,
sec. 20.015).  In Ohio, issuance of an industrial waste-
injection well permit by the Division of Oil and Gas re-
quires the approval of the State Environmental Protection
Agency, the State Geological Survey, and the Division of
Mines if the proposed well is located in a coal-bearing
township  (Ohio Revised Code).
                             146

-------
Certain elements of the actual state requirements imposed
on injection-well operations are relatively uniform, but
there are substantive provisions which vary considerably
among the states.  One such variation involves the speci-
fication of the quality parameters defining waters from
which waste discharges are to be prohibited.  It is gen-
erally accepted that injection should be restricted to
saline aquifers, and there is agreement that waters of
low salinity may be potentially useful and should be pro-
tected.  However, there is considerable variation among
the states as to the upper limit on concentration used to
designate potentially useful saline waters.  Standards es-
tablished by the New York Department of Environmental Con-
servation classify waters having a chloride content greater
than 250 mg/1 or a total-dissolved-solids content of more
than 1000 mg/1 as saline, but saline waters containing less
than 1000 mg/1 chloride or less than 2000 mg/1 total solids
are protected (New York codes).  On the other hand, the
Texas Water Quality Board considers potentially beneficial
all water having a total-dissolved-mineral concentration
between 3000 and 10 000 mg/1 (Texas Water Quality Board).
Illinois also protects all water having a total-dissolved-
solids content of less than 10 000 mg/1 (Illinois Sanitary
Water Board, 1968).  The unwritten guidelines used in
Alabama prohibit waste discharges into all groundwater less
saline than seawater, which contains about 33 000 mg/1 of
dissolved solids.  The determination of what quality of
water to protect should logically be based on a careful
evaluation of existing and projected water needs.  In the
absence of complete data of this type, a conservative phi-
losophy would be expected to govern the determination,
inasmuch as it involves a possibly irreversible commitment
of an important natural resource.

Another substantial variation in state regulatory controls
is among preliminary information requirements.  Requirements
of the various states include information concerning geology,
topography, wells and other excavations within a specified
radius (usually about 3220 m (2 mi.)), water and mineral
resources, agriculture, fish and wildlife, industrial devel-
opment, population densities, culture, and other factors.
Whereas some states have comprehensive regulations requiring
essentially the whole gamut of possible information (Colo-
rado Department of Health, 1974) , others have relatively
                             147

-------
limited requirements (West Virginia Department of Natural
Resources).   Some of the apparent variation is because the
requirements in force often may not be incorporated in for-
mal regulations, but it is probable that a significant part
of the variation is real.

Requirements for monitoring the injection process constitute
a third aspect in which state regulations differ consider-
ably.  Injection rates and pressures and the quality of in-
jected waste must usually be monitored at the injection well,
but there has been no uniformity with respect to require-
ments for separate monitor wells for the determination of
waste migration within the disposal zone and into other
strata.  A consistent policy with respect to use of monitor
wells has not always been applied, even within individual
states—such wells are utilized in some cases and not in
others.  Some of the variations can be attributed tc> dif-
fering conditions presented by individual injection sites.
For example, the close proximity of an injection well to an
aquifer serving as an important source of water supply may
create a need for monitor wells which does not exist in the
absence of such resources.  Also the presence of a fault in
the vicinity of an injection well may require the installa-
tion of monitor wells to detect movement of the waste toward
the fault, or may require monitoring of fresh water aquifers
near the fault to determine possible leakage.  The presence
of active faults may also require seismic monitoring for
detection of any activity resulting from the injection oper-
ation.

Although flexibility in these and other aspects of state
regulatory procedures is essential to efficient operation,
it is likely that a greater amount of uniformity in state
control procedures would be possible and, probably, desir-
able.  The most effective controls applicable to a given
situation in one state should also be the most effective
with respect to an identical or similar situation in another
state.  The issue of the uniformity of criteria utilized
for the control of disposal wells is of special interest
where interstate aquifers are involved.  The existence of
less restrictive requirements in one state may have the
potential of negating or compromising standards in effect
in another.  The efforts of one state to protect brackish
                             148

-------
water of a certain salinity could be nullified if an adja-
cent state allowed waste injection into interstate aquifers
containing such water.  This and other potential problems
of an interstate nature will require cooperative state
action, and will be likely to necessitate greater uniformity
in state regulatory procedures.  Much work remains to be
done with regard to standardization of controls and the
accompanying considerations of the effectiveness of various
controls.

FEDERAL CONTROLS1

Radioactive wastes have been one of the principal exceptions
to state control over subsurface disposal.  The disposal of
such materials has been regulated by the Atomic Energy Com-
mission (AEC) pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954  (U.S.
Code Annotated, 1954).  This Act preempted state control by
giving AEC exclusive authority to regulate radiation hazards
associated with nuclear materials.  An amendment enacted in
1959 provides for agreements with the states for transfer of
certain regulatory functions, but a limitation on such agree-
ments provides for retention of AEC authority with respect
to regulation of the disposal of materials which the agency
determines should not be disposed of without a federal li-
cense (U.S. Code Annotated, 1959).  A potential limitation
on AEC authority to regulate radioactive-waste disposal
arises from a governmental reorganization plan in 1970 cre-
ating the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  This plan
transferred to EPA the responsibility for establishing en-
vironmental standards with respect to radiation (U.S.  Govern-
ment Reorganization Plan No. 3, 1970).  Exercise of this
standard-setting authority would seem to impinge upon the
regulation of waste disposal by AEC.

Federal influence with respect to subsurface waste injection
is expanding considerably with the implementation of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (U.S.
Code Annotated, 1972).  Although the terms of the Amendments
do not directly encompass disposal wells, regulations pro-
posed by EPA for their implementation (Code of Federal Regu-
lations, 1972)  subjected certain disposal wells to federal
control.  Possibly of greater significance is that provi-
sions specifying the conditions for the approval of state
                            149

-------
permit programs to be operated in place of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) establish
a basis for the imposition of federal standards on state
regulatory programs for disposal wells.  Existence of
"adequate" authority for the state to issue permits for
the disposal of pollutants into wells is one of the con-
ditions which must be met before the state permit program
to regulate the discharge of pollutants into navigable
water will be approved (U.S. Code Annotated, 1972, sec.
402[b][l][D]).

Title XIV - Safety to Public Water Systems, amending the
Public Health Service Act, and bearing the short title of
the "Safe Drinking Water Act" was passed in December 1974.
Part C of this title relates directly to waste injection
wells setting forth guidelines for permitting and operation
and the enforcement powers granted the Administrator.

A summary of state statutes and regulations governing deep-
well injection as well as the EPA Administrator's Decision
Statement No. 5, and Part C of the "Safe Drinking Water
Act" are included in Appendix I, Inventory of Legislation
and Regulations.

The reporting parameters required by state statutes or
designated state agencies are summarized in Table 16.
                            150

-------
Parameters suggested in the  CnL-ironinejual liottction Agencr
Administrator's Decision Statanent No  5 as those which
should lx=  provided by the  injector to )  1 .1 thol ntjy
        (4)  Gram Mineralogy
        (5)  Matrix Type- and Mineralocjy
        (6)  i. lay Content
        '7)  Clay Maperdlo.jy
        (8)  Kffec-tive. E-vrosity  U^ti licfe  dptP-rnu'«li
        <"•>)  Permeability (and hciw deti'niiinfd)
      (10)  Coclficjait of Ac-fuller Sfoia-jf
      (11)  Amount.,  E> tent ot Narural  l-raetiiriny
      (12)  Nature of Knoi/n, Suspectocl Fa'iltiny
            t-xtent,  Effect of Natural  Solution 'TTd-incl^
            Deqrti> >f riuiO Sdt-^Kitioti
             Formation Fluid rherii
       llftj   Formation Tfanppidtutt
       (I"7)   r-'nrvjfori "tnd ^ 1 n>l  l
       (18)   tracturinq Gradient';
       d9l   Ull•^us^on ^ Ujsuersi
       (20)   Ccynpatibilit/ c,1 K^-
       (21)   rr ipctivr1  Pi (ii A ic^
                                                        i •'nation  Fluids
                                                                               r      s  <
                                                                               x    x :  F
                                                                               I    X R R
                                                                               R    X R i<
                                                                               I    X X R
                                                                               I    XII
                                                                               R    R P. P
                                                                               x  5 i H k H  i  Ł v  H :: ,  .  ~ f- ^ s

                                                                               X  'J X / N '_J  O  ' '-   , ',  I  <  ..1 /, L ^
                                                                               X  H X I P ^ "-  - X  '  "I  X  '^ « '- t  M  f-
                                                                                          •  '•  '       '         ^ s  ^  i,
                                                                               x
      crmg natu
        (1)  Diartfeter HtJi.^, 1.\j. ^*-\\
            Type,  b]?f", Wt , C>tŁenyLb  M   C.ibi.iq Stnnqs
            Specifications, Installation  Tubing a Packers
            Propost*j Cementing PToredurp-q,  'IXox; Cement
        (5)  Proposed '"oriny Progrdi-
        (6)  Proposed Forriatioti Teb* .ng  i r'Xjram
        C?)  Tiowbe-1 Vxigini- Proqrdi"
        (8)  Proposed Fractur inq or ^t in,ajati' »n F fujran
        (9)  Proposed I meet ion fiooetiur''
      (10)  nans  Surface, Subsurfacf Omatrurt ion Dtn.ulb
      (111  Fluid  Monitorinq Plans
      (12)  Expected Fluid Displaceircnt Characteristics
      (13)  Contingency Plans
rluid Injection  [ffccts Kf r»rt
        (1)  Alternative Schurnes
        (2)  Finicction  of I I :id 1'rossi.re  Response
        iJ!  I ossihli' -lul^sLii'f.irt  Chemical  Reaction^
                                                                                  \ ,L. P
                                                                                  X P I<
                                                                                  X I R
                                                                                  X X R
          ; Require*^  specif ica] iv by statute "r  agency rule
          : Not specified or implied b> statutes
              (or information not available)
                                                                       1  - Implied in general nv.ui r ^Ten:!-. i
                                                                       S  -- baiiic ab retjiurpd for pr^Juctior  -  stinulati
                                                                             in Sec  42,  Manud i  
-------
                      SECTION IX

                    REFERENCES CITED
1.   Walker,  W.  R.,  and W.  E.  Cox,  Legal and Institutional
    Considerations  of Deep-Well Waste Disposal,  2nd Int.
    AAPG-USGS-IAHS  Underground Waste Manage.  & Artificial
    Recharge Symp.  (New Orleans, Sept.  26-30, 1973) pre-
    prints,  Vol.  2, pp 3-19,  1973.

2.   Ives,  R. E.,  and G. E. Eddy, Subsurface Disposal of
    Industrial Wastes, Interstate Oil Compact Comm. Study,
    109 pp,  1968.
                            152

-------
                        SECTION X
                    GLOSSARY OF TERMS

                            A

A.P.I. - American Petroleum Institute.  Founded in 1920;
national oil trade association which maintains a Division
of Production whose offices are in Dallas, Texas.  The
A.P.I, is the leading standardizing organization on oil
field drilling and producing equipment, having published
a great many codes covering such matters.  Also has divi-
sions of transportation, refining and marketing.

A.S.T.M. - American Society for Testing Materials.  The
national offices are in Philadelphia.  Like the A.P.I, and
the A.S.M.E., the A.S.T.M. has promulgated a great number
of codes related to oil field equipment and the materials
from which such equipment is manufactured.

Abandon - To cease efforts to operate a well, and to plug
the bore hole and salvage all material and equipment.

Acidize - To put acid in a well to dissolve limestone in
a producing zone so that passages are formed through which
fluid can be transmitted to or from the well bore.

Activated Sludge - Microorganisms imbedded in gelatinous
matrices feeding on organic material under aerobic conditions.

Aggradation - Build up of topographic surface by deposition
of sediment.

Aliphatic - Organic chemical compounds in which the carbon
atoms are linked in open chains.

Alkaline Earth Metals - Calcium, strontium, barium, radium,
beryllium and magnesium.

Alkyl - A radical obtained by removal of one hydrogen from a
saturated hydrocarbon.  It has the general formula C H    „

Alluvial Fan - Deposit at foot of slope, effected by water
movement and with gentle slope.

                              153

-------
Alluvial Terrace - Valley surface effected by abrupt stream
downcutting after period of stream aggradation.

Alluvium - Clay, silt, sand, gravel, or other rock materials
transported by flowing water and deposited in comparatively
recent geologic time as sorted or semi-sorted sediments in
riverbeds, estuaries, flood plains, lakes, shores and in
fans at the base of mountain slopes.

Alpha Particle - A helium nuclei, two neutrons and two pro-
tons bound together so as to act as ones positively charged
particle.

Amorphous  - Noncrystalline, having no definite shape,.

Analysis,  Core - Laboratory examination of geological samples
taken from the well bore.  This examination is used to deter-
mine the capacity of the formation to contain oil and gas,
the possibility of oil and gas passing through the formation,
the degree of saturation of the formation with oil, gas and
water, and for other purposes.

Annular Space - The space surrounding pipe suspended in the
well bore.  The outer wall of the annular space may be open
hole or it may be string of large pipe.

Annulus - See Annular Space.

An_oxemia - A deficiency of oxygen in the blood.

Antecedent Stream - Stream course presumed to be result of
persistent established drainage that continues athwart ob-
structional present relief.

Anticline - Major fold in rock strata wherein strata are in-
clined downslope on both sides from a median line or axis.

Aqueous - In water.

Aquielude - A rock which will store water, but will not
transmit significant amounts.

Aquifer - A geologic formation, group of formations,, or
part of a formation that is water yielding.
                             154

-------
         - A rock which neither transmits nor stores water.

Aquitard - A rock that will store water and transmits
enough to be significant in the study of regional ground
water migration but does not transmit enough water to
supply individual wells.

Argyria - A discoloration of the skin caused by prolonged
contact with silver compounds.

Aromatic - An organic chemical compound which contains
one or more benzene rings.

Arroyo - Deep continuous channel from foot of mountain
canyons to and through alluvial fans.

Artesian - The occurrence of ground water under sufficient
pressure to rise above the upper surface of the aquifer.

Artesian Aquifer - An aquifer overlain by a confining bed
and containing water under artesian conditions.

Arti f ic iaj. Recharge - The addition of water to the ground-
water reservoir by activities of man.

Aryl - A radical obtained by removal of one hydrogen atom
from an aromatic hydrocarbon.

Atroph^y - Wasting away.

AvaJL_anc_he - Rock falls from unstable steep valley divides
and sides, usually accentuated by snowfall accumulation on
ridge summits.
                            B

BOD - See Biochemical Oxygen Demand.

Back-Off -- To unscrew.

Baffles - Plates which change the direction of flow of
fluids.

Bailer - A long cylindrical container, fitted with a valve
at its lower end, used to remove water, sand, mud and oil
from a well.
                            155

-------
Bailing - Operation of cleaning mud cuttings and other
material from the bottom of the well bore with a bailer.
See Bailer.

Bajada - Coalescence of alluvial fans at foot of mountain
slopes; usually of much areal extent.

Ball and Seat - The main parts of the valves in a plunger-
type oilwell pump.

Bar - Sand deposit, usually offshore, occurring at junction
of river entry into sea.

Barchane - Sand dune with outline of lunar crescent, with
windward slope at convex side and horns pointing downwind.

Base Flow - The fair-weather flow of streams, composed
largely of ground-water effluent.

Bastard - Any equipment of non-standaird shape or size.

Batch - A definite amount of oil, mud, acid, or other
liquid in a tank or pipe line.

Bay - Elongate depressions in coastal plain, 5-10 feet deep
with gentle slopes dipping into flat bottom, usually attri-
buted to solution in interfluves.

Berm - Remnant valley shoulder after rapid down cutting by
stream.

Beta Particle - Electrons emitted from radioactive atoms.

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) - The quantity of oxygen
utilized primarily in the biochemical oxidation of organic
matter in a specified time and at a specified temperature.
The time and temperature are usually five days and 20°C.

Biological Degradation - Decomposition by bacterial action.

Blank Flange (also a blind flange:)  - A solid disc used to
dead end a companion flange.

Blank Liner - A liner without perforations.
                            156

-------
Blank-Off - To close off, such as with a blank flange or bull
plug.

Bleeder - A valve or pipe through which bleeding is done.

Bleed Off or Bleed Down - To reduce pressure slowly through a
control valve.

Blow-Out - A hollow eroded into highest section of the wind--
ward side of a barchane  (sand dune); usually a feature of
shore dunes.

Blow-Out - A sudden, violent escape of gas and oil (and oorr.u-
times water) from a drilling well when high pressure gas is
encountered and preparation to prevent or to control the escape
has not been made.

Brackish Water - Water containing a concentration of total dis-
solved solids of 1,000-10,000 parts per million.

Bridge - An obstruction in a well, formed by intrusion of sub-
surface formations.  A tool placed in the hole to retain cement
or other material; may later be removed or drilled out, or
remain permanently in place.

Brine - Water containing a concentration of total dissolved
solids of over 100,000 parts per million.

Bottom Hole Contract - A contract providing for the payment
of money or other consideration upon the completion of a well
to a specified depth.

Bottom-Hole Pressure - The pressure at the bottom of a well.

Bottom Water - Water entering the well bore from the lower
levels of a reservoir.

By-Pass - Usually refers to a pipe connection around a valve
or other control mechanism.  A by-pass is installed in such
cases to permit passage of fluid through the line while
adjustments or repairs are made on the control which is by-
passed.
                              157

-------
COD - See Chemical Oxygen Demand.

Cage - The part of a pump valve which holds the ball to limit
its movement.

Caliper Logging - An operation to determine the diameter of
the well bore or the internal diameter of casing, drill pipe
or tubing.  In the case of the well bore, caliper logging
indicates undue enlargement of the bore due to a caving con-
dition or other causes.  In the case of tubular goods, the
caliper log reveals internal corrosion.

Casing Pressure - Pressure built up between the casing and
tubing.

Catalyst - A substance present in a chemical reaction, usually
in small quantities, which alters the reaction without being
changed itself.

Catching Samples - Geological information is obtained by
studying samples of the formations penetrated by the drill.
Members of the drilling crews obtain these samples from the
drilling fluid as it emerges from the well bore.  (Or from
the bailer in case of cable tools.)  This is known as
catching samples.  Cuttings so obtained are carefully washed
until free of foreign matter and then dried and accurately
labeled to show the depth at which they were found.

Cathode - The negative electrode of an electrolytic cell.

Cellar - Excavation under the derrick to provide space for
items of equipment at the top of the well bore.  Also serves
as a pit to collect drainage of water and other fluids under
the floor for subsequent disposal by jetting.

Cementing - The operation by which cement slurry is forced
down through the casing and out at the lower end in such a
way that it fills the space between the casing and the sides
of the well bore to a predetermined height above the bottom
of the well.  This is for the purpose of securing the casing
in place and excluding water and other fluids from the well
bore.
                             158

-------
Cementing, Squeeze - Forcing cement through perforations to
seal off water or gas.

Changing Rams - On rotary drilling rigs blow-outs are pre-
vented by the device known as the blow-out preventer.  The
sealing effect of the blow-out preventer is accomplished by
means of parts called rams.  It is necessary to change the
rams when drill pipe of a different size than that pre-
viously used is put in service.

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) - The measure of the readily
oxidizable material in water which provides an approximation
of the minimum amount of organic and reducing material present,

Chemical Water Quality - The nature of water as determined
by the concentration of chemical constituents.

Christmas Tree - A term applied to the valves and fittings
assembled at the top of a well to control the flow of the oil.

Circulate - To cycle drilling fluid through drill pipe and
well bore while drilling operations are temporarily suspended.
This is done to condition the drilling fluid and the well bore
before hoisting the drill pipe and to obtain cuttings from the
bottom of the well bore before drilling proceeds.  Circulation
of the drilling fluid while drilling is suspended is usually
necessary to prevent drill pipe from becoming stuck.

Circulation - Act of circulating drilling fluid to the bottom
of the well and back.

Clastic - Consisting of fragments of rocks or organic struc-
tures that have been moved individually from their places of
origin.

Collar - A pipe coupling threaded on the inside.

Coming Out of Hole - Withdrawing of the drill pipe from the
well bore.   This withdrawal is necessary to change the bit,
or change from bit to core barrel, to prepare for a drill
stem test,  and for other reasons.

Concentration - The weight of solute dissolved in a unit
volume of solution.
                              159

-------
Conductor Pipe ~ A short string of casing of large diameter
which is used in marshy locations and under certain other
conditions.  Its principal function is to keep the top of
the well bore open and to provide means of conveying the
up-flowing drilling fluid from the well bore to the slush
pit.

Confined Water - Water separated from the atmosphere by
impermeable material; also called Artesian Water.

Connate Water - Water that was deposited simultaneously
with the sediments, and has not since then existed as
surface water or as atmospheric moisture.

Consumptive Use - The quantity of water discharged to the
atmosphere or incorporated in the products of vegetative
growth or industrial processes.

Contamination - The degradation of natural water quality
as a result of man's activities, to the extent that its
usefulness is impaired.

Continental -

    Platform - feature of earth's surface comprising that
    part between sea level and 3,300' elevation; the other
    major part is between 13,000-16,000' below sea level.

    Shelf - area of shallow-water bottom between shoreline
    and top of relatively steep continental slope.

    Slope - the descent from edge of platform to deep
    ocean basin; usually occurs at distant offshore and
    begins at average depth of 600'.,

    Terrace - the built-up platform that lies at the outer
    edge of the continental shelf in water 600' or more
    deep.

Contract Depth - The depth of the well bore at which the
drilling contract is fulfilled.
                             160

-------
Coring - The act of procuring a sample of the formation being
drilled for geological information purposes.  Coring is done
by means of a core barrel.  Conventional type of core barrel
is put on the bottom of the drill pipe where bit normally
operates.  As the cutter head of the core barrel penetrates
the formations a continuous sample of the formation is taken
in the core barrel and later'withdrawn with the drill pipe.
The wire line core barrel is used in many areas since it
permits coring to be done without withdrawing the drill pipe
from the well bore.  Instead, a core barrel is dropped inside
the drill pipe and automatically locks into coring position
when it reaches the bottom of the well bore.

C. P. - Point in cased hole of cementing through perforations.
Also abbreviation for "casing point".

Crater (To Crater)  - Term meaning "the hole is caving in".
To crater refers to the results that sometimes accompany a
violent blow-out during which the surface surrounding the
well bore falls into a large hole blown in the earth by the
force of escaping gas, oil and water.  The crater sometimes
covers an area of several acres and reaches a depth of several
hundred feet.  To crater also refers in oil field slang to any
mishap which may occur to the man or the equipment.

Cut Oil - Oil that contains water; also called wet oil.

Cuttings - Particles of formation obtained from a well during
drilling operation.  These are washed out while circulating
mud-laden fluid in rotary drilling.  They are bailed out in
cable tool drilling.

Crystalline - Rock composed of crystals or fragments of
crystals.

Cuesta - A topographic ridge consisting of asymmetric hill
slopes with one steep side into a valley and the other side
gently dipped seaward.

Curie - The standard unit of radioactivity which is ths
quantity of a radioactive isotope which decays at 3,7 x
1018 disintegrations per second.

Cyanosis - A bluish discoloration of the skin, which results
from insufficient oxygen in the blood.
                              161

-------
                              D

D.S.T. - See Drill Stem Test.

Day Tour - See Tour.

Day Work - When a drilling contract is entered into between
an operator and a drilling contractor, it is frequently com-
posed of two parts; namely footage contract and day work.
While the rig is on day work it is paid for on a daily basis
at a price per day agreed upon.  Day work arrangements usually
cover drilling at extreme depths, coring, drill stem tests,
and other operations where normal drilling operations are
suspended for any reason at the request of the operator.

Decomposition - The separation of a compound into its parts.

Deficit ion - Removal of surficial dry alluvium by wind action;
differential removal due to variable size of loose particles.
Results in spectacular erosion features in desert areas.

Degradable - Capable of being decomposed, deteriorated, or
decayed into simpler forms with characteristics different
from the original.  Also referred to as biodegradable.

Degradation of Water Quality - The act or process of reducing
the level of water quality so as to impair its original use-
fulness .

Deliquescent - To become liquid by absorbing moisture from
the air.

Demineralization - The process of reducing the concentration
of chemical constituents.

Density - The weight of a substance per unit volume.  For
instance, the density of a drilling mud may be described as
"10 Ib. per gallon" or "70 Ib. per cubic foot".

Depreciation - The decrease in value of any property such as
a rig due to normal wear or the passing of time.  By including
a charge for depreciation the contractor accumulates funds to
replace the rig when it is worn out.
                             162

-------
Derrickman - The crew member whose work station is in the
derrick while the tubing or rods are being hoisted or lowered
into the hole.  He attaches the elevators to the stands of
pipe while it is being lowered into the hole and detaches
the elevators while the pipe is being hoisted.  Other res-
ponsibilities frequently include conditioning the drilling
fluid and maintenance of the slush pumps.  He is usually
next in line of authority under the driller.

Desiccant - A drying agent.

Dialysis - A process by which various materials in a solution
may be separated by selective diffusion through a semipermeable
membrane.

Directional Drilling - While the normal well bore under usual
conditions is planned to be drilled vertically, controlled
directional drilling is sometimes used to drill a well at an
angle from the vertical.  Examples are the drilling of wells
under the sea from a location on dry land and killing a blow-
out by means of a well drilled from a point at a safe distance
from the one being brought under control.  In the latter in-
stance, the well bore drilled at an angle, permits the pumping
of heavy fluids into the bore of the well which is not under
control.  Modern development of this technique makes possible
close control on both the direction and the degree of devi-
ation of a directional well from the vertical.

            We 11 - See Directional Drilling.
Pis solution - Dissolving or changing from a solid to a liquid
state .

Disturbed Structures -
    A.   Youthful

        Ancient Crystalline Mountain - Always rejuvenated,
        sometimes with monoclinal flanks.

        Belted Metamorphic Mountains - Well-dissected
        younger mountain belts or rejuvenated ancient
        belts.
                              163

-------
        Domes - Singly or in complexes.

        Fault Blocks - Includes troughs  and hoist type
        mountains or ranges.

        Fold Mountains - Singly or in chains.

        Fold-thrust - Nappe complexes -  alpine types.
        Mixture of sediments and crystallines.

    ^*  Old Age - All preceeding structures are reduced to
        late mature or old age landscapes.

Dome - A general geomorphic term denoting a circular or oval
topographic feature, usually a lifting or upwarping of a sedi-
mentary cover caused by deep-seated igneous intrusion or by
plastic flow of deep salt deposits pushed upward by differ-
ential pressure.

Domestic Well - A well which supplies water for the occupants
of a single residence.

Double - A section of drill pipe casing or tubing consisting
of two joints screwed together.  See Thribble; Fourble.

Downcomer - A pipe through which flow is downward.

Drainage - Patterns are arrangements of spatial relation-
ships among streams or rivers which may be influenced by
inequalities of slope, rock resistance,  structure and
geologic history.  The resultant patterns are varied, and
have been classed as follows:

    annular - circular drainage pattern linked by one
    radial stream; where dome exists in alternating hard
    and soft sedimentary rocks.

    barbed - sharp reversal in direction of stream flow
    as in wire hook, usually caused by capture or 'piracy1
    of one stream flow by another.

    dendritic - random pattern of branching where no
    structural control is present as in homogeneous
    surface lithology or where surface sediments are
    flat lying.
                              164

-------
    deranged - uncoordinated, numerous local drainage basins
    and lakes, not enough time for coordination since exis-
    tence of present drainage.

    karst - numerous sink holes, few surface streams; caused
    by solution of predominant, underlying limestone causing
    much underground drainage.

    parallel - regularly spaced parallel or sub parallel
    streams; usually caused by distinct slope or struc-
    tural control like faults, hard rocks alongside soft
    rocks, and symmetrical folds.

    radial - streams radiating out from a common center;
    associated with volcanic cones and with domes in rela-
    tively homogeneous material.

    rectangular - drainage in two directions at right angles,
    both equally developed and caused by joint or fault con-
    trol in homogeneous strata.

    trellis - pattern with one dominant direction with a
    subsidiary direction of drainage at right angles to its
    link up with main stream usually associated with tilted
    or folded alternating hard and soft sedimentary rocks.

Drawdown - The lowering of the water table or piezometric
Surface caused by pumping or artesian flow.

Dresser Sleeve - A slip-type collar that is used to join
plain-end pipe.

Dri1ling Out - This refers to drilling out of the residual
cement which normally remains in the lower section of casing
and the well bore after the casing has been cemented.

Drilling Under Pressure - Carrying on drilling operations
while maintaining a seal at the top of the well bore to
prevent the well fluids from blowing out.

Drill Stem Test - A test taken by means of special testing
equipment to determine whether or not oil or gas in com-
mercial quantities has been encountered in the well bore.
This test is universally used because it yields useful
                             165

-------
information and permits the continuation of drilling after
the completion of the drill stem test to explore other
possible pay sections.

Driller - The employee directly in charge of a drilling rig
and crew.  Operation of the drilling and hoisting equipment
constitute his main duties.
                              E

Effluent - A material which flows out.

Electrodialysis - Separation of materials in a solution by
selective diffusion through a semipermeable membrane using
an electric field as the driving force for the separation.

Erosion (soil) - The removal of material from the soil sur-
face by the actions of running water, wind, or by gravity.
May be thought of as 'normal1 if soil formation keeps pace
with soil removal and 'accelerated" or 'catastrophic' if
the loss of surface material greatly exceeds that produced
by weathering.

Escarpment (scrap)  - A cliff or steep rock face of great
linear extent; may be structurally or erosionally induced.

Estuary - That part of a lower river course that is affected
by a mixing of fresh and salt water because of 'overdeepening1
of the river bed to where the river bed lies below mean sea
level, thereby permitting encroachment upstream by sea water.

Expansion Loop - A bend placed in a line to absorb stretch
or shrinkage.

Extrusive Structures - Landforms depend on geochemistry and
viscosity of magma; result in following:  volcanic cones,
domes, lava fields and plateaus, and calderas.
Fall Line - A line joining the waterfalls on a number of
successive rivers that marks the point where each river des-
cends from the upland (Piedmont) to the lowland (Coastal
Plain).
                             166

-------
Fault Block (block mountains, fault block mountains) -
Mountains produced by crustal fracturing and characterized
by more or less rectilinear borders, lack of continuity of
formation, usually parallel or subparallel, with associated
parallel and subparallel lowlands.

Faults - A movement in the earth's surface of contiguous
masses wherein points of contact have been dislocated or
displaced along the plane of movement.

    normal - A fault wherein the acute inclined plane at
    the surface moves downward with respect to the masses
    in adjacent plane.

    reverse - A fault wherein the acute inclined plane at
    the surface moves upward with respect to the mass in
    adjacent plane.

Filling the Hole - Pumping drilling fluid into the well bore
as the pipe is being withdrawn in order to maintain the fluid
level in the hole near the surface.  The purpose is to avoid
danger of blow-out and caving of the well bore.

Fishing; - Operations on the rig for the purpose of retrieving
from the well bore, sections of pipe, casing, or items which
may have inadvertently been dropped in the hole.

Fittings - The small pipes and valves that are used to make
up a system of piping.

Flood Plain - The flat ground along a stream course which is
covered by water at flood stage.

Fluid Leve1 - Distance between well head and point to which
fluid rises in the well.

Fluvial Sediment - Those deposits produced by stream or
river action (see Alluvium).

Formation Pressure - Pressure at the bottom of a well that
is shut in.

Fourble - A section of drill pipe, casing or tubing consisting
of four joints screwed together.  See Double; Thribble.
                             167

-------
Fourble Board - A platform installed in the derrick at an
elevation of 80 feet to 120 feet above the derrick floor.
The derrickman works on this board while the pipe is being
hoisted from or lowered into the well bore.

Fracturing, Hydraulic - Forcing liquid into a formation to
open passages for oil.  Called also Hydrofrac, Sandfrac,
Dolofrac, Stratafrac, etc., by different service companies.

Fresh Water - Water containing a concentration of total
dissolved solids of 0-1,000 parts per million.

Frost Up - Icing of equipment due to the cooling effect of
expanding gas.
gpd - Abbreviation for gallons per day.

gpm - Abbreviation for gallons per minute.

Gamma Rays - Particles of electromagnetic energy released
from radioactive nuclei upon disintegration.

Gastroenteritis - Inflammation of the. stomach.

Geolograph - Patented device which records the rate of
penetration during drilling operations.   Sometimes referred
to as a "tattletale".

Geomorphic Unit (described in report]  -  See Disturbed
Structure, Extrusive Structure, and Undisturbed Structures.

Gingivitis - Inflammation of the gums.

Glacial Drift - Boulders, till, gravel,  sand or clay trans-
ported by a glacier  or its meltwater.

Graben - A fault block generally elongate, that has been
lowered relative to the blocks on either side without major
disturbance or pronounced tilting.
                            168

-------
Gravity, Specific - The ratio of weights of equal volume of
two substances, one of which is taken as a standard.  Water
is taken as a standard of comparison for liquids and solids.
For gas, air is usually taken, although hydrogen is some-
times used.

Griefstem - A heavy square pipe that works through the
square hole in the rotary table and rotates the drill
stem in rotary drilling.  This is generally called the
Kelly or Kelly Joint.

Ground Water - Water beneath the land surface that is under
atmospheric or greater pressure - the water that enters wells
and issues from springs.

Ground-Water Recharge - The processes by which water is
added to a ground-water reservoir.

Ground-Water Reservoir - The earth materials and the inter-
vening open spaces that contain ground water.

Gun-Perforating - A common method of completing a well is
to set casing through the oil bearing formation and cement
it at that depth.  The casing is then gun-perforated by a
device which is lowered in the hole and fires steel projec-
tiles through the casing and into the pay formation.
                              H

Half-Life - The time required for half of the atoms in a
group to decay.

Hardness - A property of water caused by the presence of
calcium and magnesium, which is reflected in the use of
soap and the formation of incrustations when the water is
heated.  It is expressed as an equivalent amount of calcium
carbonate.

Hard Water - Water with over 60 mg/1 of hardness.  Hard
water consumes more soap in the formation of a lather,

Hemolysis - The destruction of red blood cells, liberating
hemoglobin.
                             169

-------
Hole •- A common term which usually refers to the well bore.
Mouse Hole and Rat Hole are shallow bores under the derrick
in which the kelly joint and points of drill pipe are tem-
porarily suspended while making a connection.  Rat hole also
refers to hole of reduced size in the bottom of the regular
well bore.  Sometimes the driller "rat holes ahead" to facil-
itate the taking of a drill stem test when it appears that
such a test will be desirable.

Horst - A fault block, generally elongate, that has been
raised relative to the blocks on either side without major
tilting or folding.

Hydrologic Budget - An accounting of the inflow to, outflow
from, and storage in, any hydrologic unit, such as a basin,
aquifer, lake, or irrigation project.

Hygroscopic - The ability of a substance to readily absorb
moisture from the atmosphere.
I.A.D.C. - International Association of Drilling Contractors.
Founded in 1940.  National headquarters, 505 N. Ervay Street,
Dallas, Texas.  This organization concerns itself with re-
search, education, accident prevention, and other matters
of interest to drilling contractors.  Maintains about 12
chapters throughout the United States.  Official publication,
The Drilling Contractor, bi-monthly magazine.

I.U.C. - International Union of Chemists.

Ice-Contact Deposits - Deposits formed in contact with
melting glacier ice.

Igneous Rock - Rock formed by the solidification of molten
material that originated within the earth.

Inclinometer - The trade name of an instrument used to deter-
mine whether or not the well bore is proceeding in a vertical
orientation at any point.  In most drilling operations either
regulations of government bodies or contract stipulations, or
both, provide a maximum deviation of the well bore from the
                             170

-------
vertical; commonly this maximum is three degrees.  When
deviation is in excess of the allowable, it is necessary
to modify drilling procedure to bring it back in line.

Industrial Well - A well used for the supply of water
utilized in an industrial process.

Infiltration - The flow of a liquid into soil or rock
through pores or small openings.

Inhibitor - According to Webster, any agent which inhibits
or prevents.  In drilling and producing operations it
usually refers to corrosion inhibitor.  Corrosion inhibitors
are used widely in drilling and producing operations to pre-
vent corrosion of metal equipment exposed to hydrogen sul-
phide gas and salt water.  In some drilling operations cor-
rosion inhibitor is added to the drilling fluid to protect
drill pipe.

Insulating Flange - A flange which incorporates plastic
pieces to separate the metal parts.

Diterfluve - Land between two rivers.

Internal-Upset - An extra-thick wall is provided on the end
of drill pipe at the point where the pipe is threaded in
order to compensate for the metal removed in threading.
Conventional drill pipe has the extra thickness on the out-
side.  Internal-upset drill pipe has the extra thickness on
the inside with a uniform straight wall on the outside.  It
is usually referred to as "internal-upset, external-flush"
pipe.

Ion_ Exchange - A reversible interchange of ions between a
solid and liquid mixture.  The solid is not permanently
changed, but can be treated to return it to its original
state.

Irrigation Return FJ.OW - Irrigation water which is not con-
sumed in evaporation or plant growth, and which returns to
i surface stream or ground-water aquifer.

T_Łomer_s_ - Two or more compounds having the same molecular
formulas, but different structures.
                            171

-------
Jet - A hydraulic device operated by pump pressure for the
purpose of cleaning fluid out of the pits and tanks on a
rotary drilling location.

Jetting Out - Operation using the jet to clean out the
cellar slush pit, etc.

Jet-Perforating - An operation similar to gun-perforating
except that a shaped charge of high explosives is used to
burn a hole through the casing instead of the gun which
fires a projectile in gun-perforating.
                              K

Killing a Well - The act of bringing under control a well
which is blowing out; also applied to the procedure of
circulating water and mud into a completed well before
starting well-service operations.
LC50 - Lethal concentration fifty - the concentration which
would cause death to fifty percent of the exposed population
when inhaled.
gram of body weight which would cause death to fifty percent
of the exposed population if ingested.

Laccolith - Igneous intrusion via a conduit from a deep source
that invades horizontal overlying sedimentary formations and
which has lifted the sedimentary formations.

Lacustrine - Deposits which have accumulated in fresh water
lakes or marshes.

Lap - Term usually applied to an interval in the cased hole
where the top of a liner overlaps the bottom of a string of
casing.
                              172

-------
Lava - Generally all extruded volcanic material; more specif-
ically that material that emerges from a vent in a fluid or
pasty state.

Liner - Any string of casing whose top is situated at any
point below the surface.

Location - The point at which a well is to be drilled.  In
Canada, the term "Wellsite" is used.

Log - A running account listing a series of events in
chronological order.  The driller's log is a tour-to-tour
account of progress made in drilling.  Electric well log
is the record of geological formations which is made by a
well-logging device.  This device operates on the principle
of differential resistance of various formations to the
transmission of electric current.

Logging, Electrical - See Log.

Logging, Mild An alysis - A continuous examination of the
drilling fluid circulating in the well bore for the purpose
of detecting gas and other hydrocarbons.

LoseReturns - To encounter an interruption in the circu-
lation of drilling fluid due to the fact that the fluid
is entering into a porous formation underground rather
than returning to the surface.
                              M

MAC - Maximum Allowable Concentration - The maximum concen-
tration considered harmless to healthy adults during their
working hours, assuming they breathe uncontaminated air the
remaining time.

mgd - Abbreviation for million gallons per day.

mg/1 - Abbreviation for milligrams per litre.

Making a Connection - The act of screwing a joint of drill
pipe on to the drill stem suspended in the well bore.
                             173

-------
Making Hole - Drilling.

Making Trip - Consists of hoisting the drill pipe to the
surface and returning it to the bottom of the well bore.
This is done for the purpose of changing bits, preparing
to take a core, and for other reasons.

Master Gate - A large valve used to shut in a well.

Meander - A form of stream channel course that is sinuous
and curved.

Metamorphic Rock - A rock which has teen altered by heat
or intense pressure, causing new minerals to be formed
and new structure in the rock.

Metajsediments - Sedimentary rocks that have been altered
by metamorphic processes like heat and pressure.

Milligrams Per Litre - The weight in milligrams of any sub-
stance contained in one litre of liquid.  Approximately
equivalent to parts per million.

Mineralization - The natural process of accumulation of
mineral elements and/or compounds in soil or water.

Miscible - Liquids being completely soluble in each other
in all proportions.

Monocline - Steplike bend in otherwise horizontal or gently
dipping beds; it consists of a change in the amount of dip
from gentle to relatively steeper and back again to gentle,
but direction of dip remains essentially unchanged.

Moraines - Characteristic glacial land forms that are the
product of transport by moving ice  (either mountain glaciers
or continental ice sheets) and which are deposited during
both the forward and backward movement of an ice front.

Mouse Hole - See Hole.

Mud-Qff - In drilling, to seal the hole off from the water
or oil by using mud.  Applies especially to the undesirable
blocking off of the flow of oil from the formation into the
well bore, and special care is given to the treatment of
drilling fluid to avoid this.
                             174

-------
                              N

N - Abbreviation for Newton.

Nappe - Term applied to anticlinal folds that have been
upset, flattened, broken, thrust forward, and finally
topped by forward thrust recumbent folds from another
episode.

Natural Brines - A highly saturated solution of soluble
minerals, usually found in rocks associated with salt
deposits or as a result of sea water evaporation.

Natural Leaching - The removal by a solvent of the more
soluble minerals in soil or rocks by percolating waters.

Newton - The SI unit indicating that force which, when
applied to a body having a mass of one kilogram gives it
an acceleration of one metre per second per second.

Nocuous - Harmful or poisonous.

Nutrients - Compounds of nitrogen, phosphorous, and other
elements essential for plant growth.
                              0

Offset Well - Well drilled near another one.

Open Hole - The uncased part of the well.

Operator - The person, whether proprietor or lessee,
actually operating a mine or oil well or lease.

Outlier - Detached mass of rock, isolated by differential
weathering along rock joints, in front of main rock body.

Outwash - Stratified glacial drift that is deposited by
meltwater streams.

Outwash Fan - Mass of debris carried away by outflow stream
from ice margin of glacier, especially where land slope away
from margin is enough to carry such meltwater; outwash fans
may be wide-spread areally.
                             175

-------
Oxidation - The losing of electrons, the positive element
going to a higher valence state.
Pa - Abbreviation for Pascal.

pjpm - Abbreviation for parts per million.

Parts Per Million - One part per million means one part by
weight of dissolved matter in a million parts by weight of
solution, e.g., one kilogram of dissolved solids in one
million kilograms of water or one ton of dissolved solids
in one million tons of water.  The measure is therefore
independent of units used.  Approximately equal to milli-
grams per litre if the concentration of dissolved solids
is low and the specific gravity of the water is nearly
1.0.  The relationship to milligrams per litre is shown as:

    parts per million = 	milligrams per litre	
                        specific gravity of the water

Pascal - The SI unit of pressure or stress of one newton per
square metre.

Pediment - Term applied to the plains in arid and semi-arid
country that exist between mountain front and low-lying
terrain; the plain (pediment) has gentle slope (1-7°), smooth
surface and is little dissected.  The pediment surface is
generally veneered bedrock and is faintly concave in longi-
tudinal section.

Peneplain - Defined as almost featureless plain with little
accordance with structure and controlled only by a close
approach to base level; represents the near final stage of
baselevel erosion.

Penetration, Rate of - The rate at which the drill proceeds
in the deepening of the well bore.  It is usually expressed
in terms of feet per hour.

Perched Ground Water - An isolated body of ground water
separated from the underlying main body of ground water by
an unsaturated zone.
                             176

-------
PjsrŁolat i on - Movement under hydrostatic pressure of water
through interstices of rock or soil.

Perforate - See Gun Perforating.

Permeabi1i ty - A measure of the capacity of a porous medium
to transmit fluid.

Pesticides - Chemical compounds used for the control of
undesirable plants, animals, or insects.  The term includes
insecticides, herbicides, rodent poisons, nematode poisons,
and fungicides.

Persistance - The property of a chemical to remain unchanged.

Piezometrie Surface - The surface defined by the levels to
which water will rise in tightly cased wells.  Also called
potentiometric surface.

Pic[ - A scraping tool forced through a flow line or pipe
line to clean out wax or other deposits  (see rabbit).

Plateau - High plain of flatlying rocks.

Piaya - Distinctive feature of desert terrain; the term
playa is applied to a dry lake remnant of a former base
level or erosion and may be considered to be a dry lake
periodically filled with a sheet of water.

Plug Back - To seal off the bottom section of a well bore
to prevent the inflow of fluid from that portion of the
hole.

Pollutants - Substances that may become dissolved, suspended,
absorbed or otherwise contained in water, and impair its
usefulness.

Pollution - The degradation of natural water quality, as a
result of man's activities, to the extent that its useful-
ness is impaired.

Porosity - The relative volume of the pore spaces between
mineral grains in a rock as compared to the total rock
volume.
                             177

-------
Potable - Water that is drinkable.

Pressure Regulator - A valve which  controls pressure in a
line, downstream from the valve.

Primary Treatment (Sewage)  - The  removal of larger solids
by screening, and of more finely  divided solids by sedimen-
tation.

Production Well - A well from which ground water is obtained.

Protection Casing - A string of casing set to protect a
section of the hole and to permit drilling to continue to
a greater depth.  Sometimes called  "protection string" and
"intermediate string".

Province (Physiographic) - Any region that has unit structure,
and unit geomorphic history; a stage in the hierarchical
classification of regional morphologic units.

Public Supply Well - A well from which ground water is ob-
tained serving more than one individual or household.

Pulling Casing - Removing casing from a well.

Pulling Unit - A well-service rig used in pulling rods and
tubing from the well.

Pyroclastic - Literally means 'firebroken1 and refers to all
volcanic ejecta, large and small, that are brought to the
surface from beneath via eruptive forces.
Rat Hole - See Hole.

Rabbit - A small plug that is run through a flow line by
pressure to clean the line or test for obstructions.

Rad - Radiation absorbed dose.  The absorbed dose of any
nuclear radiation which is accompanied by the liberation
of 100 ergs of energy per gram of absorbing material.
                             178

-------
R ad i pact i ve De c ay - The disintegration of an atom by emitting
radiations.

Recharge Basin - A basin designed for the purpose of adding
water to the ground-water reservoir.

Ref actory- A hard to melt material used in high temperature
furnaces .

Re 1 i e f Va 1 ye - A valve that will open automatically when
pressure gets too high.

Re ve r s e_ C i r cu lati on - Normal course of drilling fluid circu-
lation is downward inside the drill pipe and upward in the
well bore space surrounding the drill pipe.  On special
problems, this normal circulation is sometimes reversed and
the fluid returns to the surface through the drill pipe after
being pumped down in the annular space.

Reverse Osmojsijs - The flowing of a solvent across a permeable
membrane from the side of less solvent concentration to the
side of higher concentration due to external pressure being
applied to the side of less solvent concentration.

Rigging Up - Before the work of drilling can be started, but
after the derrick has been built, tools and machinery must
be installed and a supply of fuel and water must be estab-
lished.  This operation, which in substance is that of
getting the rig ready, is conveniently described by the
drillers' term "rigging up".

      - A pipe through which liquid travels upward.
Re c k P re s s u r e - A term used for the initial pressure of gas
in a well.

Ro tary Dri 1 ling - The hydraulic process of drilling consists
of rotating a column of drill pipe, to the bottom of which is
attached a rotary drilling bit, and during the operation, cir-
culating through the pipe a current of mud- laden fluid, under
pressure, by means of special slush pumps.

Round Trip - See Making Trip.
                             179

-------
SI. - Abbreviation for the International System of Units
(Systime International d'Unites).

Salaquifer - An aquifer containing brackish water, salt
water or brine.

Salt Dome - The topographic expression of the upward push
by deep salt beds that have been rendered plastic by over-
burden weight and may rise as much as 100 feet above the
surface terrain.

Salt Water - Water containing a concentration of total dis-
solved solids of 10,000 - 100,000 parts per million.

Salt-Water Intrusion (or Encroachment) - Movement of salty
ground water so that it replaces fresh ground water.

Sanded Up - Clogged by sand entering the well bore.

Saturation, Zone of - The zone in which interconnected inter-
stices are saturated with water under pressure equal to or
greater than atmosphere.

S chlumbe rger - Refers to electric well logging.  It is de-
rived from the name of a French scientist who first developed
well logging.  One of the leading companies in this field of
operation bears this name.  Around drilling rigs throughout
the country it is pronounced "slumberjay".

Scree - Name applied to continuous talus slopes accumulating
from debris fall from ridge summits.

Secondary Treatment - The oxidation of organic matter in
sewage through bacterial action.

Sedimentary Rock - Rocks formed by the accumulation of sedi-
ment.

Set Casing - To install steel pipe or casing in a well bore.
An accompanying operation is the cementing of the casing in
place by surrounding it with a wall of cement extending for
all or part of the depth of the well.
                             180

-------
Shutdown - A term denoting that work has been temporarily
stopped, as on an oil well.

Shut In - To close valves on a well so that it stops pro-
ducing; said of a well on which the valves are closed.

Shut-in Pressure - Pressure at the top of a well when it
is shut in.

Side Tracking - Drilling past a broken drill or casing which
has become permanently lodged in the hole.  This operation
is usually accomplished by use of a special tool known as
a whip-stock.

!3ide Wall Coring - The taking of geological samples of the
formation which constitutes the wall of the well bore.
Another term in general use for this operation is "side
wall sampling".

Single - A joint of drill pipe.  See Double, Thribble,
Fourble.

Sink Hole - Any depression ranging from a shallow saucer
shape to a funnel shaped or cylindrical  pipe that normally
give access to underground caves.

Skidding the Rig - Moving a rig from the location of a lost
or completed hole preparatory to starting a new one.  In
skidding the rig, the move is accomplished with little or
no dismantling of equipment.

Slurry - A plastic mixture of cement and water which is
pumped into the well to harden, after which it supports
the casing and provides a seal in the well bore to prevent
migration of underground fluids.

Soft Water - Water containing 60 mg/1 or less of hardness.

Solifluction - Downslope movement of soil material resulting
from frost action.

Specific Capacity - The rate of discharge of water from a
well divided by the drawdown  of the water level in it.
Properly stated, it relates to the time of pumping.
                            181

-------
Spinner Survey - An operation designed to indicate the point
at which fluids are escaping from the well bore into a caver-
nous or porous formation.

Spit - Subaqueous accumulation of sediment produced by long-
shore drift and made to extend in a straight line far out
across Bay Mouth.

Spudding - Refers to the act of hoisting the drill pipe and
permitting it to fall freely so that the drill bit strikes
the bottom of the well bore with considerable force.  This
is done to clean the bit of an accumulation of sticky shale
which has slowed down the rate of penetration.  Careless
execution of this operation can result, in kinks in the
drill pipe and damaged bits.

Spudding In - The very beginning of drilling operations of
a well.  The term had been handed down from cable tool oper-
ations in the early days of the oil industry.

Squeeze Job - Usually a secondary cementing job where cement
is pumped into the formation through the bottom of the casing
or through perforations to obtain a shut off of undesirable
fluids.

Stomatitis - Inflammation of the mouth.

Storage (Aquifer) - The volume of water held in the inter-
stices of the rock.

Stream (River) - Large body of flowing water, constrained
in a channel.

Stuck - Refers to the drill pipe or casing inadvertently
becoming fastened in the hole.  May occur while drilling
is in progress, while casing is being run in the hole or
while the drill pipe is being hoisted.  Frequently results
in a fishing job.

Surface Pipe - The first string of casing to be set in a
well.  The length will vary in different areas from a few
hundred feet to 3,000 - 4,000 feet.  Some states require a
minimum length to protect fresh-water sands.  On some wells
it is necessary to set a temporary conductor pipe which
should not be confused with surface pipe as described here.
                             182

-------
Surf ace _Wa te r - That portion of water that appears on the
land surface.

Swab - A device that fits the inside of tubing closely that
is pulled through the tubing to lift fluid from it, or to
pull such a device through the tubing.

Swabbing - Operation of a lifting device to bring well fluids
to the surface when the well does not flow naturally.  This
is a temporary operation to determine whether or not the well
can be made to flow.  In the event the well does not flow
after being swabbed, it is necessary then to install arti-
ficial lift to bring oil to the surface.

Syncline - A downfold in strata whose opening is upward and
whose flanks dip inward toward median or axis.

Synthesis - The formation of compounds from elements or other
compounds.
T.D. - See Total Depth.

TLm - Median tolerance limit.  The concentration which kills
fifty percent of the test organisms.

TLV - Threshold limit valve.  The concentration  (mg/M3) or
dose (mg/kg of body weight) to which receptors can be exposed
repeatedly without adverse effect.

Tail Out - To pull the bottom end of a pipe or sucker rod
away from a well when laying down.

Temperature Survey - An operation to determine temperatures
at various depths in the well bore.  This survey is used in
instances where there is doubt as to proper cementing of the
casing, to find the location of inflows of water into the
well bore, and for other reasons.

Te rt i ary T re atmen t - Advanced waste treatment which removes
additional impurities which remain in the effluent after
secondary treatment.
                             183

-------
Thief Sand - A porous formation in which drilling fluid
flows from the well bore during drilling operations.  See
Lose Returns.

Thribble - A stand of drill pipe nade up of three joints
each about 30  feet in length.  This is equivalent to a
fourble of 4 joints about 22 feet to 23 feet in length.
Setting back fourbles of 30-foot joints requires a
taller derrick than is normally used in rotary drilling.
(See Fourble;  Double.)

Total Depth (T.D.) - The greatest depth reached by a well
bore.

Tour - The word which designates the shift of a drilling
crew or other oil field workers is pronounced usually as
if it were spelled t-o-w-e-r.  The word does not. refer to
the derrick or tower, as some seem to think.  The day tour
starts at 7 or 8 in the morning.  The evening tour starts
at 3 or 4 o'clock in the afternoon.

Transmi ssivity - The rate at which water is transmitted
through a unit width of the aquifer under a unit hydraulic
gradient.

Tubing Job - The pulling and running of tubing.

Turning to the Right - A slang term on a rotary rig refer-
ring to the drilling operation during which the drill stem
is rotated in a clockwise direction.

Twist Off - To twist a joint of drill pipe in two by ex-
cessive force applied by the rotary table.  Many failures
which result in parting of the drill pipe in the well bore
are erroneously referred to by this term.  Slang for any
mistake.
                              U

Unconfined Water - Water not separated from the atmosphere.

Unconsolidated Rocks - Uncemented or loosely coherent rocks.
                             184

-------
Undisturbed Structures  (Plains & Platforms) -

    Coastal PIains - pass seaward into continental shelves
    with little or no break.

    Lowland Plains - usually conform to structure of under-
    lying sedimentary basins, sometimes conform to erosion
    surfaces discordantly crossing ancient folds.

    Upland Plains - usually discordant to underlying
    structure; rarely conformable on existing flatlying
    formations.

    Plateaus - horizontally bedded rocks (sediments)  ele-
    vated to unusual altitudes.

Under-ream - To enlarge a drill-hole below the casing.
                              W

       - See Waiting on Cement.
Waiting on Cement - After the casing has been cemented, it
is necessary to suspend operations and allow time for the
cement to set or harden in the well bore.  The time during
which operations are suspended is designated as waiting on
cement.

Water Cycle - The complete cycle through which water passes;
water vapor in the atmosphere, liquid and solid as precipi-
tation as part of surface and ground water and eventually
back to atmospheric vapor.

Water Quality - Pertaining to the chemical, physical and
biological constituents found in water and its suitability
for a particular vapor.

Water Table - That surface in an unconfined water body at
which the pressure is atmospheric.  It is defined by the
levels at which water stands in wells that penetrate the
water body just far enough to hold standing water.
                             185

-------
Water-Table Aquifer - An aquifer containing water under
water-table conditions.

Weathering - The comminution of rock strata into fine-
sized particles, effected by physical or mechanical
weathering (temperature, water, wind) and by chemical
weathering (interaction of solvent with rock mineral
and resulting changes).  The latter  (chemical weathering)
is dependent on the presence of water.

Work-Over - To perform one or more of a variety of remedial
operations on an operating well with the hope of restoring
or increasing operating efficiency.  Examples of work-over
operations are deepening, plugging back, pulling and re-
setting the liner, squeeze cementing, shooting and acidizing.
                             186

-------
                              TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                        (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1 REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/2-77-029a	
 4? TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 REVIEW AND ASSESS11ENT OF DEEP-WELL
 INJECTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
 Volume I
                                                  3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSI Off NO.
                                                  5. REPORT DATE

                                                    June 1977  (Issuing Date
                                                  6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHORIS) Louis R.  Reeder, James H.  Cobbs,
John W. Field,  Jr.,  William D. Finley,
Steven C. Vokurka,  and Bernard N.  Rolfe
                                                  8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REIPORT NO '
9. PERFORMING ORG -\NIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Louis R. Reeder  and Associates
 5200 South Yale
Tulsa, Oklahoma   74135
                                         Cin., OH
 Municipal Environmental Research  Laboratory--
 Office of Research and Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Cincinnati, Ohio   45268
                                                  10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO,
                                                                           -J
                                                    1DC618,  (SOS  2,  Task 02)
                                                  11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                                    68-03-2013
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                  13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                    Final Report
                                                  14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                    EPA/600/14
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 See also Volumes  II,  III, & IV, EPA-600/2-77-029b,c,&d
 Project Officer:   Carlton C. Wiles,  684-7881
 16. ABSTRACT This  four volume report  is  a review and  assessment of the ade-
 quacy of deep-well waste injection  systems to receive hazardous wastes
 and to define  what effects that these wastes will have upon the environ-
 ment when injected into subsurface  reservoirs.  All  aspects of deep-well
 injection systems  have been touched  upon.

 A comprehensive  bibliography, chemical waste profiles, deep-well inven-
 tory, case histories,  microbiological research, deep-well and hazardous
 waste research,  legal  aspects and an inventory of statues and regula-
 tions governing  waste  injection are  discussed in  the text and detailed
 in the appendices.
 7.
                           KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
               DESCRIPTORS
                                      b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
 Waste Disposal
 Deep-Wells
 Hazardous Materials
 Industrial Wastes
                                      Industrial  Waste Dis-
                                        posal
                                      Underground Disposal
                                        Systems
                                      Deep-Well Disposal
                                      Waste Disposal Wells
                                      Hazardous Waste Injec
 3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  RELEASE TO PUBLIC
                                      19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                                        UNCLASSIFIED
                                       20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                         UNCLASSIFIED
   13B
                                                             :ion
21. NO. OF PAGES
  215
                                                             22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                                         *US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1977-757-056/5615

-------