EPA/233/R-02/001
          Status Of The State
          Small Business Stationary
          Source Technical And
          Environmental Compliance
          Assistance Program (SBTCP)

          Report To Congress
          For The Period
          January To December 2000

-------

-------
                          REPORT TO CONGRESS

      STATUS OF THE STATE SMALL BUSINESS STATIONARY SOURCE TECHNICAL
            AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

                        FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD
                        JANUARY • DECEMBER 2000
 __
•p                            PRESENTED BY:

                            KAREN V. BROWN
 j                      SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN
g                OFFICE OF THE SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN
O                 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                            WASHINGTON, DC
                               JUNE 2002

-------
                           ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Small Business Ombudsman is
grateful for the support of the dedicated staff of the State Small Business Stationary
Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Programs (SBTCPs),
including the Small Business Ombudsmen (SBOs), Small Business Assistance Programs
(SBAPs), and the Compliance Advisory Panels (CAPs) in the preparation of this fourth
Report to Congress. All states and territories submitted timely reports to make this report
complete and comprehensive.

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                   Page

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS	i

COMMON ACRONYMS	vi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	ix

1.0   INTRODUCTION AND REPORT OVERVIEW	1-1

      1.1   Rationale and Objective of the Report to Congress  	1-1
      1.2   Data Collection Methodology 	1-1
      1.3   Report Organization 	1-3

2.0   OVERVIEW OF THE SBTCP  	2-1

      2.1   Background	2-1
      2.2   Small Business Ombudsman 	2-2
      2.3   Small Business Assistance Program	2-2
      2.4   Compliance Advisory Panel 	2-2
      2.5   EPA SBO's Responsibilities Under Section 507 of the CAA	2-3
      2.6   Small Business Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program	2-4
      2.7   Federal Small Business Assistance Program	2-6

3.0   SBTCP STATUS, BUDGETS, STAFFING, ORGANIZATION	3-1

      3.1   Operating Status	3-1
      3.2   Budgets	3-2
      3.3   Staffing Levels	3-4
      3.4   Administrative Locations of SBO and SBAP Components 	3-6

4.0   SBTCP ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES 	4-1

      4.1   Industry Sectors Assisted by the SBTCPs  	4-1
      4.2   Activities and Services  	4-4
      4.3   Assistance Requests	4-8
      4.4   Cap Activities and Services	4-9
      4.5   Financial Assistance Programs	4-11
      4.6   Minimizing Duplication of Efforts	4-11
      4.7   SBTCP Compliance with Section 507(d)(2)  	4-13

5.0   PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS	5-1

      5.1   Program Goals 	5-1
      5.2   Program Highlights and Accomplishments	5-4
      5.3   Tips and Barriers	5-7
      5.4   Success Stories and Case Studies	5-8

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
                               (continued)

                                                                      Page

6.0    COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE ISSUES	6-1

      6.1   Common Compliance Problems	6-1
      6.2   Compliance Problems in Particular Industry Sectors  	6-2
      6.3   Recommended Changes to Facilitate Small Business
           Compliance with the CAA	6-5
      6.4   Program Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest 	6-6
      6.5   Use of EPA's Small Business/Small Communities Policy	6-7
                              LIST OF TABLES
Table No.                                Title                          Page

3-1          Operating Status of the SBTCP Components	3-1
3-2          2000, 1999, and 1998 SBTCP Operating Budget Ranges	3-2
3-3          SBTCP Reporting Period Budget Comparisons	3-3
3-4          2000 Staffing Levels (as FTEs) Serving the SBO & SBAP Functions  . 3-5
3-5          CAP Appointments	3-6
3-6          Administrative Locations of SBO and SBAP	3-6
3-7          Regulatory/Nonregulatory Locations of SBO and SBAP  	3-7

4-1          Top 10 Industry Sectors Assisted	4-2
4-2          Top 10 Industry Sectors Assisted by Programs  	4-2
4-3          Industry Sectors Targeted for Assistance	4-3
4-4          Outreach Activities and Businesses Reached 	4-5
4-5          Notable Outreach Strategies	4-6
4-6          Information Available on Internet Home Pages  	4-7
4-7          Air-only Versus Multimedia Assistance	4-8
4-8          CAA/Multimedia Assistance Requests 	4-9
4-9          Major CAP Activities	4-10
4-10        Financial Assistance Programs	4-11
4-11        SBTCP Mechanisms for Avoiding Duplication 	4-13
4-12        Activities to Follow the Intent of the Paperwork Reduction Act	4-15
4-13        Activities to Follow the Intent of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 	4-15
4-14        Activities to Follow the Intent of the Equal Access to Justice Act  .... 4-16

5-1          Program Goals	5-2

6-1          Common Compliance Problems	6-2
6-2          Compliance Problems in Industry Sectors 	6-3
6-3          Industry Sector Appearance in Compliance Categories	6-4
6-4          2000 SBTCP Recommendations for Improving Compliance  	6-5
6-5          Small Business/Small Community Policy Use	6-7
6-6          Small Business Policy Activities  	6-8


                                     iv

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS
                             (continued)


                             APPENDICES

A          2000 SBTCP Reporting Form
B          Federal Small Business Ombudsman
C          Federal Small Business Assistance Program
D          SBTCP Status, Budgets, Staffing, and Organization
E          SBTCP Activities and Services
F          Program Effectiveness
G          Compliance Assurance Issues

-------
                          COMMON ACRONYMS

Below is a list of major abbreviations and acronyms that are commonly used in this report.

BACT      Best Available Control Technology
BACM      Best Available Control Measures
CAA       Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
CAP       Compliance Advisory Panel
COI        Conflict of Interest
EMS       Environmental Management System
EPA       Environmental Protection Agency
FESOP     Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit
FTE       Full-time Equivalent
HAP       Hazardous Air Pollutant
ICR        Information Collection Request
LAER      Lowest Achievable Emission Rate
MACT      Maximum Achievable Control Technology
MOU       Memorandum of Understanding
MSDS      Material Safety Data Sheet
NAAQS     National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NESHAP    National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NOV       Notice of Violation
NOx       Nitrogen Oxides
NSPS      New Source Performance Standards
NSR       New Source Review
OECA      Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
OMB       Office of Management and Budget
P2         Pollution Prevention
                                    vi

-------
PERC      Perchloroethylene
PM        Participate Matter
PTE       Potential to Emit
RACT      Reasonably Available Control Technology
RCRA      Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RMP       Risk Management Plan
SBA       Small Business Administration
SBAP      Small Business Assistance Program
SBDC      Small Business Development Center
SBO       Small Business Ombudsman
SBREFA    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
SBTCP     Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance
           Assistance Program
SIC        Standard Industrial Classification
SIP        State Implementation Plan
UST       Underground Storage Tank
VOC       Volatile Organic Compound
                                    VII

-------
                           EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Small Business Ombudsman (SBO) is
pleased to submit  this sixth  Report to  Congress  describing the  activities and
accomplishments of the state Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental
Compliance Assistance Programs (SBTCPs) during the reporting period,  January 1 -
December 31, 2000.

This report is being submitted in accordance with Section 507(d), Monitoring, of the Clean
Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), which directs EPA to provide Congress with periodic
reports on the status of the SBTCPs. This oversight responsibility has been delegated by the
EPA Administratorto EPA's Small Business Ombudsman (SBO). The Report also includes
a general report on the EPA SBO's actions to monitor the SBTCPs.

This report addresses two of the EPA SBO's key oversight responsibilities:

      Render advisory opinions on the overall effectiveness of the SBTCPs, difficulties
      encountered, and degree  and severity of enforcement [507(d)(1)].
      Make periodic reports to Congress on compliance of the SBTCPs with the Paperwork
      Reduction Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice Act
      [507(d)(2)].

The SBTCPs are designed to assist small businesses comply with the requirements of the
CAA through  state-operated programs.  Each SBTCP  is required  to include three
components or functions: an SBO,  a Small Business Assistance Program (SBAP), and a
Compliance Advisory Panel (CAP).

SBTCP staff members continue to fill an important role as facilitator or mediator between
small business owners/operators and regulatory agencies, enhancing communication to
promote understanding and sensitivity on both sides. Based on the information reported,
improvements in compliance occur because businesses  have someone to turn to for
assistance and advice, and to act as an effective liaison with regulatory agencies.

During this sixth year of monitoring the SBTCPs, 875,710 small businesses have been
reached (as tallied by assistance efforts to specific industry sectors); this figure does not
include 1,250,122 publications distributed by Ohio. This is slightly lowerthan the 920,384
reported in 1999. Beginning in 1998, the number of businesses assisted was tallied both by

                                     ix

-------
industry sector and eight separate types of assistance. This format more fully captures the
true picture of businesses assisted by the programs. Many programs have improved their
recordkeeping strategies, resulting in higher quality and more comprehensive data.

SBTCP operational growth has stabilized over the past several years. Fifty-two states and
territories reported operational SBAPs (Connecticut did not respond). Alaska, Connecticut,
Massachusetts and Vermont are without SBOs. Only 42 programs reported operational
CAPs.  While some  states have been working to establish a CAP  or to obtain CAP
appointments and reappointments, several states still have not begun to initiate the CAP
function.

Budgets for the SBTCPs have a wide range from $0 to over $1.3 million  for 2000. Total
budget for all programs was almost $1.5 million.  As programs mature and the cost of
establishing programs stabilize, most programs are projecting fairly consistent budgets for
the next reporting period (35 this year versus 38 last year). Ten programs project budget
increases for 2000, the same as last year, which were attributed to expanding services or
receiving grants for special projects.
Ninety-six percent of SBTCPs provided specific information on their assistance to 72 industry
sectors in eight assistance categories The top ten industry sectors receiving assistance by
SBTCPs in 2000 were:
                         TOP 10 INDUSTRY SECTORS ASSISTED
                                 Other (not classified)*
                                    Cross Sector*
                        Auto/Body Maintenance, Repair, Refinishing*
                                    Government*
                             Dry Cleaning/Laundry Services*
                               Metal Fabricating/Finishing
                                  Printing/Graphic arts
                               Organizations/Associations*
                           Gasoline Distribution (wholesale/retail)
                             Agriculture/Farming/Crop Service
                   Note *: Also in the top 10 in 1999.

-------
The top ten industry sectors that received assistance from the most programs were:
                         TOP tO INDUSTRY SECTORS ASSISTED
                                   BY PROGRAMS    t  ^  !
                              Dry Cleaning/Laundry Services*
                        Auto/Body Maintenance, Refinishing, Repair*
                                       Other*
                                     Government*
                       Furniture Manufacturing/Repair/Wood Finishing*
                              Attomey/Consultant/Engineer*
                               Metal Fabricating/Finishing*
                                  Printing/Graphic Arts*
                                 Construction/Contractor
                               Paints and Painting/Coatings
                   Note*: Also in the top 10 in 1999.

Toll-free hotlines, on-site visits, seminars, mailings, and publications are among the wide
range of outreach mechanisms used to serve the small business community. Other state-of-
the-art outreach activities, such as Internet home pages, are seeing increased use. Programs
also noted outreach strategies they found to be particularly effective in assisting small
businesses. At least ten programs each mentioned the following strategies: workshops (25
programs), on-site visits and direct contact (15), direct mailings (11), partnering with others
(11), and guidance  materials (11).

From year to year, programs have stressed the value of direct contact in building trust and
confidence in the business community. Because of their nature, on-site visits and workshops
typically reach fewer businesses than "mass" outreach strategies  like mailings  and
publications. However, programs indicate that the quality of the contacts made through direct
interaction between business owner and technical assistance provider can lead to improved
compliance.

While the CAA called for the establishment of SBTCPs for air-related issues, a number of
states began  their  programs as multimedia (offering assistance with water,  solid  and
hazardous waste, etc. in addition to air); more have transitioned their programs to multimedia.
                                        XI

-------
Forty programs indicated they have a full or partial multimedia assistance focus. Their small
business clients need and expect it. Small businesses appreciate "one stop shopping" for
their compliance and technical assistance questions, ratherthan working through numerous
media-based departments.  States that offer air-only assistance cite funding problems in
using Section 507 money for non-air assistance.

Forty-two CAPs indicated they were operational in 2000;  however, 49 CAPs reported
activities even though they  may not have had a CAP or an active panel.  Primary CAP
activities were reviewing and commenting on state legislative actions and meeting with small
businesses and trade associations. CAPs are pursuing many diverse avenues in becoming
effective partners in the technical assistance programs. The unique roles and specialized
skills of the members make them valuable resources in SBTCP development. The value-
added  activities of these CAP members underscore the  need for states still without
operational CAPs to complete the appointment/reappointment process and initiate the CAP
function. Of special note, the slow reappointment process of CAP members is especially a
source of frustration for programs wishing to have a full and active CAP.

Fifty programs reported some sharing of resources  within their state/territory. Generally,
programs recognize the efficiency and value of coordinating their efforts with  environmental
agency departments, state agencies, and other organizations. Forty-nine programs reported
actions to minimize duplication of efforts among SBTCPs, thus enhancing the overall cost
effectiveness of individual programs.

Section 507 directs EPA's SBO to monitor the SBTCPs1 efforts to follow the intent of the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction, Regulatory Flexibility, and Equal Access to Justice
Acts.

       Eighty-seven percent of programs report taking specific actions associated with the
       Paperwork Reduction Act, with the most common action being receiving and providing
       information electronically.
       Eighty-three percent of programs report taking specific actions consistent with the
       intent of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The primary activity by programs was ensuring
       that small businesses could  participate  in the rulemaking process.
       Sixty-eight percent of SBTCPs reported specific actions similar to those associated
       with the Equal Access to Justice Act.  Most commonly mentioned  were routinely
       reviewing SBTCP documents for compliance and reviewing instances where state
       actions against small businesses appear unjustified.
                                      XII

-------
Programs were asked to define and prioritize their own program goals, discuss strategies to
evaluate their goals, and indicate the results of this measurement process.  Increasing
understanding of environmental obligations and improving compliance rates were the two
most frequently listed goals for the last three years. For evaluation, most programs focused
on the number of businesses reached and the types of assistance offered to measure their
success. Only a few states have attempted to measure compliance improvements.

Fifty SBTCPs provided insight on compliance issues addressed while providing technical
assistance to small businesses.  The most common compliance problem mentioned was
small businesses "not understanding the regulatory requirements," which has been the number
one compliance problem cited for the last five years. Compliance issues have remained
consistent from yearto year. Identifying key problems and gaps in understanding by the small
businesses have helped the SBTCPs to best target their assistance efforts.

Thirty-four SBTCPs provided recommendations for changes to facilitate small business
compliance with the CAA.
                SBTCP RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING COMPLIANCE
        Increased funding/continued adequate funding for SBTCPs
        Allow flexibility/simplification in applying regulations to small businesses
        Multimedia assistance/P2 emphasis
        Simplify paperwork/reporting requirements
        Regulations written in plain English
        Grants/loans for small businesses
        Generic outreach and training materials
        Expand/facilitate effective communication between state and federal agencies
        Develop compliance incentives
        Develop a national public relations/advertising program
        Form a National CAP
        SBTCPs as lead program for environmental technical assistance
        Conduct on-site assistance
        Develop national tracking and reporting database
        Develop national recognition program for small businesses
        Clean and simple audit privileges/voluntary disclosure policies
                                        XIII

-------
Programs were asked to describe how their SBTCP avoids internal or external conflicts of
interest orthe perception that their program may not be confidential. Eighty-three percent of
programs reported no problems concerning confidentiality or with conflict of interest issues
during the course of providing services regardless of whether a confidentiality policy is in
place. Program structures range from a guarantee of confidentiality (most common) to
offering no confidentiality. Many programs have policies that protect small businesses from
penalties if violations are discovered during the course of their receiving technical assistance.

Finally, programs were asked how they used EPA's Policy on Compliance Incentives for
Small Businesses or a comparable state policy for small businesses/ communities. Nineteen
states indicated that either the small business EPA or state policy has been adopted, but only
three states indicated the policy has been put to use. Two programs have adopted a small
communities policy, but none reported any use.  Programs likely are not yet tracking such
statistics, as evidenced by the high number of programs not answering this question.

Overall, the SBTCPs offer important one-on-one contacts, provide valuable information such
as the need to have operating permits, maintaining records, compliance options, pollution
prevention technologies and techniques, and compliance requirements. This assistance
enables small businesses to arrive at informed decisions and more effectively come into
compliance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
      As has been noted since 1995, SBTCPs are being run by hardworking, dedicated
      staffs who operate successful programs with what they report to be often limited
      budgets and resources. Small businesses are grateful forthe technical assistance and
      personalized attention from people they can trust. In this sixth year of gathering
      information from the programs, over 875,000 small businesses have been reached (as
      tallied by industry sector).
      SBTCPs facilitate dialog between the small business community and the regulatory
      community, fostering trust, and improving attitudes and awareness towards regulatory
      compliance.
      SBTCPs have significant expertise and are increasingly becoming multimedia as
      states want to offer this type of assistance, and small businesses are requesting it.
      Programs are seeking ways to expand the scope and quality of the services they offer
      and the means to fund the enhanced services. To maximize their budgets and staffing
      capabilities and to minimize duplication of effort, programs are encouraged to use the
      resources of the federal SBO and SBAP plus those developed by other SBTCPs. The
      Internet has proven to be an excellent tool for sharing information.
                                      XIV

-------
Again in 2000, the most commonly  identified compliance  problem was  small
businesses not understanding regulatory requirements. Many current SBTCP activities
are designed to remedy this and other such problems. The concerns regarding these
problems underscore the critical  role of the SBTCP in providing  vital technical
assistance and promoting compliance by establishing trust and greater understanding.

In conducting the Federal program, EPA has followed  the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction, Regulatory Flexibility, and Equal Access to Justice Acts. EPA's
SBO has monitored SBTCP activities forfollowing the intent of the provisions of these
three Acts. The number of programs reporting specific activities associated with these
Acts has significantly increased in the past several years.  The careful review of
SBTCP documents, receiving and providing information electronically, and ensuring
that small businesses can participate in rulemaking are among the positive actions
implemented to fulfill the intent of the Acts.

Program activities primarily emphasize mechanisms to reach larger audiences (e.g.,
mailings, hotlines).  However, one-on-one assistance has been reported as a key
method in bringing small businesses into compliance, and programs are encouraged
to increase their emphasis on personalized assistance. Allocation  of adequate
resources to permit on-site visits by program staff is important. On-site visits (as
tallied by industry sector) totaled 9,586, up slightly from 9,103 last year.

Efficiency of information transfer (among SBTCPs and to small businesses) can be
realized through the increased use of Internet home pages. Presently, 51 programs
operate a home page. Programs again are encouraged to explore the potential of the
Internet for sharing information with small businesses and with other SBTCPs.

Again, only 15 percent of SBTCPs reported the availability of financial assistance
programs in 2000, the same as in 1999.  Small businesses have expressed their need
for creative financing mechanisms.  Programs are encouraged to explore the potential
for sponsoring or facilitating  financial assistance programs for pollution control or
pollution prevention capital expenses and to use existing financial programs as
models.

SBTCPs report that they are often underfunded and understaffed as they provide their
current level of services. Because of this, they may be challenged to expand their
function both in air-related outreach and multimedia technical assistance. EPA could
develop Interagency Personnel Agreements to provide staff to states that are
shprthanded or need assistance  in revitalizing their programs.  EPA also could
facilitate legislation to allow  programs to use Section 507 monies  for multimedia
activities (versus air only).

SBTCPs are encouraged to better utilize the expertise of their CAP members to
enhance improvements in theirtechnical assistance programs. As has been noted in
the five previous Reports, several states still do not have operational CAPs. A number
of CAPs also need to address vacancies of the CAP due to expired terms. Gaining
cooperation from state legislators in the appointment and reappointment process has
been particularly challenging for many programs.

The current system of CAP appointments by state governor and legislature slows or
hinders CAP progress and development. This system should be revised to simplify
CAP appointments or states could pursue the formation of advisory bodies  with
similar functions.

                                xv

-------
CAP members should pursue the formation of a National CAP to better represent the
interests and needs of CAP members and to promote the formation of panels in states
without CAPs or where CAPs are inactive.

The annual SBO/SBAP conference (held in  Missoula,  MT in 2000) is a perfect
networking opportunity for program staff and CAP members from across the country.
Working groups could be convened at this conference to address specific issues
identified in this Report, and to develop recommendations to EPA and Congress on
SBTCP operations.

EPA's Small Business Cooperative Agreement Program provides a much needed
infusion of funds to SBTCPs. This grant program will nurture innovative approaches
to small business assistance and  facilitate  information transfer to  other state
assistance programs. Without such funding, many of the grant recipients may not have
been able to pursue their projects.
                                XVI

-------
                1.0  INTRODUCTION AND REPORT OVERVIEW

1.1    RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE REPORT TO CONGRESS

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Small Business Ombudsman is pleased
to submit this Report to Congress describing the accomplishments and activities of the state
and territory Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance
Assistance Programs (SBTCPs) during the January 1 - December 31,2000 reporting period.

This is the sixth Report to Congress on this important program designed to help the small
business community understand and cost-effectively comply with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990.

This report is submitted in accordance with Section 507(d), Monitoring, of the CAA, which
directs EPA to provide Congress with periodic reports on the SBTCPs. This oversight and
reporting responsibility has been delegated by the EPA Administrator to the EPA Small
Business Ombudsman (SBO).

This report is intended to address two of the EPA SBO's responsibilities with respect to the
SBTCPs.

1.    Render advisory opinions on the overall effectiveness of the SBTCPs, difficulties
      encountered, and severity of enforcement [507(d)(1)].
2.    Make periodic reports to Congress on compliance of the SBTCPs with the Paperwork
      Reduction Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice Act
      [507(d)(2)].

1.2    DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY

Information to assess the SBTCPs was collected through a relatively simple, standardized
online Reporting Form, which was designed to streamline the reporting process.  Online
reporting was piloted by 22 programs forthe 1999 reporting year and was fully implemented
for 2000.

In December 2000, the online Reporting Form (forthe reporting period January through
December 2000) was opened to state/territory SBTCP contacts. These contacts were

                                    1-1

-------
requested to coordinate completion of this Form among their SBO, SBAP, and CAP. A copy
of the 2000 SBTCP Reporting Form is enclosed as Appendix A.

Programs were not asked to create information that they did not have; therefore, some
SBTCPs were not able to answer all questions posed. Based on the information requested
in the Reporting Form from the first year of reporting, programs were encouraged to revise
the types of statistics they track in subsequent years to simplify completing future reports.

The online form was accessible through a conventional Internet browser. Each participant
received a confidential login and password to open his or her secure form.

Participants answered questions by typing information, ticking check boxes, and selecting
choices from drop down menus. They could save their responses, editthem at anytime, and
print theirform. Technical assistance through Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC),
Pittsburgh, PA, developer and host to the online reporting system, was always available to the
programs.

Once participants were satisfied with their answers, they electronically "locked" and submitted
their form for processing. Forms were due by March 1, 2001.

The information provided in the Forms was compiled and analyzed to produce this report. The
50 states, plus the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, submitted
2000 SBTCP Reports (53 programs total); Maricopa County, AZ, and Jefferson County, KY,
also submitted reports.

For statistical purposes of this report, data from counties have not been combined with state
data except where noted.  Raw data for the  counties are shown in the appendices.
Percentages have been rounded.

According to the Federal Register of November 13,1996, Volume 61, Number 220, Pages
58284-94, EPA promulgated  a direct final rule conditionally exempting the Territory of
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI),  and the
Territory of Guam from the requirements of Title V of the CAA. Therefore, reports were not
received from American Samoa, CNMI, and Guam.
                                     1-2

-------
1.3   REPORT ORGANIZATION
This report is organized into six main sections, the Executive Summary, and Appendices,
which include the specific information and data as provided by the individual SBTCPs.
Section 1.0
Introduction and Report Overview
Section 2.0
Section 3.0
Section 4.0
Section 5.0
Section 6.0
Overview of the SBTCP - This section provides an overview of the
three components of the SBTCP (i.e., the SBO, the SBAP, and the
CAP) as well as EPA's responsibilities under Section 507. Information
on the 1999 Small Business Assistance Cooperative Agreement
Program is included.

SBTCP Status, Budgets, Staffing, and Organization -This section
encompasses these four categories of information about the SBTCPs.

SBTCP Activities and Services - In  this section, assistance to
industry sectors and the types and levels of services provided by the
SBTCPs are discussed including efforts to comply with the Paperwork
Reduction, Regulatory Flexibility, and Equal Access to Justice Acts.
Financial assistance program information also is included.

Program Effectiveness - Program goals and evaluation strategies
are discussed.  General information on some of the accomplishments
and highlights of the programs in 1999 are outlined. Program tips and
barriers plus success stories and case studies also are included.

Compliance Assurance Issues - Information on the effectiveness of
the SBTCPs in providing compliance assistance support to state small
businesses is provided in this section. Recommendations to facilitate
compliance and confidentiality issues are discussed. Finally, programs
report on their use of EPA's Small Business/Small Communities Policy.
                                     1-3

-------
                       2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE SBTCP

2.1    BACKGROUND

Congress recognized the particular problems that many small businesses would have in
dealing with the CAA's complex requirements. Atypical small business employs fewer than
50 people and is the only business operated by the owner - it is the comer dry cleaner, the
"mom and pop" bakery, the auto repair shop, the tool and die company, or one of a host of
other local business establishments.  Many small businesses have been in the same family
and neighborhood for generations.

To a small business owner, air pollution control regulations may seem very complex. Many
may not be able to afford to hire lawyers or environmental specialists to interpret and comply
with all the requirements they may be responsible for in the Act. Most may be hard pressed
to leam about even basic requirements and deadlines that affect them, let alone the more
complicated issues they have to address to control air emissions, such as:

•     The types of pollutants their company emits that are subject to the Act's requirements.
      The methods they can use to estimate emissions for a permit application.
•     The types of control technologies that are best and least costly forcontrolling a specific
      production process or chemical substance they use to make goods and services.
•     Process or substance substitutes they can use to prevent or reduce emissions.

As part of Section 507 of the CAA, the U.S. Congress mandated that each state/territory
establish an SBTCP to assist small businesses comply with the requirements of this Act
through state-operated programs. Each SBTCP (also commonly referred to as a "Section
507 program") is required to include the following three components or functions:

      Small Business Ombudsman (SBO)
      Small Business Assistance Program (SBAP)
      Compliance Advisory Panel (CAP).

The CAA also required states/territories to develop a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
implementing an SBTCP by November 1992. Congress envisioned that these programs
would be in place before small businesses began to feel the direct effects or deadlines of the
Act. As of December31,2000,50 of 53 states/territories (94 percent) had received approval
                                     2-1

-------
from EPA fortheir SIPs implementing Section 507 of the CAA. States/territories whose SIPs

have not yet been officially submitted and/or approved are Hawaii, Rhode Island, and

Vermont.


2.2   SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN


The state/territory SBOs serve as the small business community's representative where small

businesses are impacted by the CAA. The SBO's key responsibilities may include:


      Reviewing and providing recommendations to EPA and state or local air pollution
      control authorities regarding development and implementation of regulations impacting
      small businesses.

      Disseminating information about upcoming air regulations, control requirements, and
      other matters relevant to small businesses.

      Referring small businesses to appropriate specialists for help with specific needs.

      Conducting studies to evaluate the effects of the CAA on state and local economies,
      and on small businesses generally.


2.3   SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM


The SBAPs are the technical and administrative support component within the state

governments. The SBAPs have access to air quality experts, technically proficient engineers,
scientists and managers, and environmental specialists who provide  information and
assistance to small businesses on matters of:


      Determining applicable requirements under the Act and permitting assistance
      The rights of small businesses under the Act
      Compliance methods and acceptable control  technologies
      Pollution  prevention and accidental release prevention and detection
      Audit programs.

2.4   COMPLIANCE ADVISORY PANEL


The CAPs are created at the state level and are comprised of at least seven members:


      2 members who are not owners of small business stationary sources-selected bythe
      Governor to represent the public.
                                     2-2

-------
•     2 members who are owners of small business stationary sources - selected by the
      lower house of the state legislature.

      2 members who are owners of small business stationary sources - selected by the
      upper house of the state legislature.

      1 member from the state air pollution permit program - selected by the head of that
      agency.

The responsibilities of the CAP are to:

      Render advisory opinions concerning the effectiveness of the SBTCP, difficulties
      encountered, and degree and severity of enforcement.

      Report on the compliance of the SBTCP with the intent of the Paperwork Reduction
      Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice Act.

      Submit periodic reports to EPA's SBO.

      Review information  for  small  business stationary sources to ensure it is
      understandable to the layperson.


2.5   EPA SBO's RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER SECTION 507 OF THE CAA
Section 507(d), Monitoring, directs the EPA to monitor the SBTCPs and to provide a report

to Congress. This responsibility has been delegated to EPA's SBO, whose oversight duties
are to:
      Render advisory opinions on the overall effectiveness of the SBTCP, difficulties
      encountered, and degree and severity of enforcement [507(d)(1)].

      Make periodic reports to Congress on the compliance of the Paperwork Reduction
      Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice Act [507(d)(2)].

      Review information issued by the SBTCPs to ensure that it is understandable to the
      layperson [507(d)(3)].

      Have the  federal SBAP serve  as the  secretariat for  the  development  and
      dissemination of reports and advisory opinions [507(d)(4)].


Further information on the activities and accomplishments of EPA's Office of the Small

Business Ombudsman may be found in Appendix B-1.
                                     2-3

-------
2.6   SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM

In October 1999, the EPA SBO announced ten demonstration projects funded under a Small
Business Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. These projects are designed to
improve state environmental assistance to small businesses with an emphasis on measuring
results and benefits.  The awards, for up to a two-year period, ranged from $60,000 to
$100,000.  These awards reflect EPA's commitment to support innovation in existing
networks that help businesses prevent pollution and comply with the law. The projects chosen
for funding represent a wide range of small business sectors, offer the  potential for
demonstrating innovative ideas, and have far-reaching benefits to other state assistance
programs.

The ten projects have demonstrated three important management approaches:

I.     Manage an industry sector for full compliance or pollution-free status.
II.    Use partnerships to multiply the demand and capacity for delivering assistance.
III.    Develop, test, and make available nationwide useful tools for delivering  assistance.

The first type is a long term strategy to produce results on mission: the targeted sector moves
to high levels of compliance or shifts to pollution free practices. The second type leverages
the usually small assistance program in dramatic ways through partnerships. Significantly
more businesses are reached and high levels of assistance are provided. The third type
positions the nation's network of state programs as a learning community with intellectual
assets and a knowledge management charter.

Four of the projects are Type I, testing management strategies for systematically moving a
specific industry sector into full compliance and toward cleaner technologies.

      California South Coast Air Quality Management District ($100,000) - The project is
      testing a multi-state, public-private partnership approach to assist small businesses
      in reducing air  emissions with  a focus towards the water heater and  boiler
      manufacturing industries.
      Maine Department of Environmental Protection ($60,821) -- The project is testing a
      strategy to reduce pollution by changing  business practices in a targeted sector. One-
      on-one assistance is designed to help auto repair and auto body shops switch to
      optimum, clean technologies.
                                      2-4

-------
      Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ($96,824) - The project is creating partnerships
      to provide on-going assistance to an entire industry. Compliance assistance is being
      provided to the reinforced plastics and boat manufacturing industries.

•     New  York Environmental Facilities  Corporation ($83,681)  - The project  is
      demonstrating how a well organized information and public relations strategy can move
      a defined industry sectorto compliance. The demonstration proposes to move 2,700
      gasoline stations into compliance with leak test requirements.


Two of the projects are Type II, testing partnership development strategies to extend reach

and impact.


•     Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment ($84,177)—This project
      is developing a network of partners to expand  the reach of its small business
      assistance program.  Colorado is integrating the resources of several assistance
      providers and integrating assistance tools  tailored to specific customer needs.

•     New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ($84,000) - This project is using
      leverage to expand the reach and impact of a small business compliance assistance
      program. The leverage will come through partnerships with other assistance providers
      using high impact materials.  Partners are mobilized for direct outreach to small
      businesses.


Four of the projects are Type III, strengthening the national program by developing useful tools

that can be used by all states.


      Kansas State University Pollution Prevention Institute($99,984)-This projecttested
      an approach for one-on-one assistance by  using retired engineers to provide direct
      technical assistance to dry cleaners, automotive repair/auto body, and metal finishing.
      Kansas is now testing an assistance strategy for increasing compliance and reducing
      pollution in Colorado's printing industry.

      Montana Department of Environmental Quality ($75,000) - This project will develop an
      assessment of needs for small business assistance, especially in rural communities
      in Montana. The project includes test marketing methods to stimulate requests for
      assistance and to increase business and public awareness about the assistance
      program.

      South Carolina Department of Health and  Environmental Control ($93,000) - The
      project has reached out to small auto repair shops and salvage yards that often are
      beyond the reach of the  regulatory sector.  Partnerships will be used to reach
      businesses by using special materials and training.

      Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality ($68,960) - The project is building a
      state information system to locate small business customers for direct compliance
      assistance. This data base will be used to send an information guide to all affected
      small businesses in the state. This guide will include the full range of compliance
      assistance resources available. Partners will help develop and distribute the guide.
                                      2-5

-------
After the projects are completed in the middle of 2001, results will be reported to Congress
under a Congressional mandate and published and distributed to the small business
community and other interested groups.

2.7   FEDERAL SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

EPA, through the Federal SBAP, provides technical guidance for the SBTCPs' use in
implementing their programs. Information on the activities of the Federal SBAP may be found
in Appendix C.
                                    2-6

-------
           3.0 SBTCP STATUS, BUDGETS, STAFFING, ORGANIZATION


Information on the operating status (Section 3.1), budgets (Section 3.2), staffing levels

(Section 3.3), and administrative locations of the three components of the SBTCPs (Section

3.4) for the January - December 2000 reporting  period may be found in this chapter.


A listing of state/territory Ombudsman, SBAP, and alternate SBAP contacts is included in

Appendix D-1.


3.1    OPERATING STATUS


As of the end of 2000, 49 SBOs (92 percent, down from 51 in 1999) and 52 SBAPs (98

percent, compared to 100 percent in 1999) were providing assistance to small businesses.

Only 42 programs reported that their CAP was operating.


Operating status for each SBTCP component is shown in Table 3-1; programs whose SBOs,

SBAPs, and CAPs are not yet established or operational also are  identified.
TABLE 3-1
OPERATING STATUS OF THE SBTCP COMPONENTS


SBO2
SBAP3
CAP4
COMPONENTS ESTABLISHED1
# Programs
50
53
44
% Programs
94
100
83
COMPONENTS OPERATIONAL1
# Programs
49
52
42
% Programs
92
980
79
Note 1:  Programs indicated if their SBO, SBAPs, or CAPs had been established (i.e., created by legislation), and if
       they were also providing services. Programs were considered operational if the SBOs had been appointed,
       SBAPs were providing services, and CAPs had conducted at least one meeting, even if not all CAP members
       had been appointed.

Note 2:  SBO Established: NR - Alaska, Massachusetts; NE - Vermont
       SBO Operational: NR - Alaska, Connecticut, Massachusetts; NO - Vermont

Note 3:  SBAP Operational: NR - Connecticut

Note 4:  CAP Established: NR - Alaska, California, Massachusetts; NE - Hawaii, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virgin
       Islands; NA - Iowa, Maryland
       CAP Operational: NR - Alaska, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts; NO - Arizona, Hawaii, Tennessee,
       Virgin Islands; NA - Iowa, Maryland, Rhode Island.
                                        3-1

-------
Details on when the SBOs, SBAPs, and  CAPs were reported to be established and
operational may be found in Appendix D-2.

3.2   BUDGETS

The total operating budgets for the 2000 reporting year for the SBTCPs varied from $0
(Delaware) to over $1,300,000 (New York) for the 2000 reporting year. Total budget for all
programs was almost $15 million. 2000 operating budget ranges forthe SBTCPs are shown
in Table 3-2; 1999 and 1998 ranges also are shown for comparison. Details on the operating
budgets, by program, forthe individual SBO, SBAP, and CAP components, including the
source of these funds, may be found in Appendix D-3.
'• ' : -. ' •• ';' ' ; ' TABLE3-2 ''..-'.-;.-'-"• '- - '•"..'•' '• -
2000, 1999, and 1998 SBTCP OPERATING BUDGET RANGES

BUDGET $
0
1-100,000
100,001-200,000
200,001-300,000
300,001-400,000
400,001-500,000
500,001-600,000
600,001-700,000
700,001-800,000
800,001-900,000
900,001-1,000,000
>1,000,0002
>2,000,0003
No data provided4
TOTAL
2000
#
Programs
1
6
16
8
6
5
4
1

1
1
1

3
53
%
Programs1
2
11
30
15
11
9
8
2

2
2
2

6

1999
#
Programs

9
16
7
8
5
3
2

1

2


53
%
Programs1

17
30
13
15
9
6
4

2

4



1998
#
Programs

8
15
10
9
4
3
1

1
1

1

53
%
Programs1

15
28
19
17
8
6
2

2
2

2


Note 1: County budgets are not combined with state budgets, nor are they counted separately.
Note 2: Texas (1999), New York (1999, 2000).
Note 3: New York.
Note 4: Alaska, Connecticut, Massachusetts.
                                      3-2

-------
3.2.1  Comparison of Previous and Projected Budgets

A comparison of budgets from 1999, 2000, and 2001 (projected) is valuable in tracking
program growth and resource allocation. Programs were asked to indicate significant budget
changes (greater than ten percent) from year to year and to provide insight into any major
shifts (more than ten percent) in funding levels. SBTCP reporting period budget comparisons
are shown in Table 3-3.
''*•-- ;i • ' .'- -. »"": >: •'• *'<•• A •• TABLETS; w -..^ '. '.-••' ' "' '• -'"•" :-'-•
SBTCP REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET COMPARISONS


1999 to
2000
Reporting
Period
2000 to
2001
Reporting
Period
BUDGET DECREASE
(> 10% change)
#
Programs
7
3
%
Programs
13
6
BUDGET CONSISTENT
(< 10% change)
#
Programs
33
35
%
Programs
62
66
BUDGET INCREASE
(> 10% change)
#
Programs
10
10
%
Programs
19
19
INSUFFICIENT DATA
FOR COMPARISON1
#
Programs
3
5
%
Programs
6
9
Note 1:  Not all programs provided budget amounts. In order to establish trends, combined budgets for the S6O, SBAP, and CAP
      were examined. This was necessary, as some programs indicate combined budgets for two or three facets of their
      programs, while other programs may have had one or two facets of their programs inactive during a reporting period.
In reviewing the combined budgets forthe SBO, SBAP, and CAP functions of theSBTCPs,
ten programs (19 percent) indicated a budget increase (of at least ten percent) from the 1999
to 2000 reporting periods. Ten programs (19 percent) expect an increase forthe 2000 to
2001 reporting periods.  Data have remained fairly consistent as programs generally are
mature and established.

According to responses received, projected budget increases primarily were related to the
expansion of services and staff additions orthe receipt of grants. Examples of reasons given
for budget increases greater than ten percent are provided below:

       In 2000, Delaware did not have an ombudsman. The new SBO began in April 2000.
       ($0/2000 to $78,000/2001)
       Georgia will add two full time positions in 2001. ($205,000/2000 to $245,000/2001)
                                       3-3

-------
      South Carolina's funding increases are due, in part, to hiring an SBAP engineer with
      significant environmental work experience and for replacing staff members' computers.
      ($126,000/2000 to $174,000/2001)

Thirty-three programs (62 percent) reported steady budget levels (less than a ten percent
change) for the 1999 to 2000 reporting periods, and 35 programs (66 percent) indicated
consistent budget levels for the 2000 to 2001 (projected) reporting periods.

Seven programs (13 percent) showed a decrease (more than ten percent) from the 1999 to
2000 reporting periods, while three programs (6 percent) projected a decrease from the 2000
to 2001 periods. Budget reductions often are attributed to staff loss or expiration of grant
funds.

Eighty percent of the programs reported either a consistent or increasing budget from the
2000 to 2001 (projected) reporting periods.

Budgets for the 1999, 2000, and 2001 (projected) reporting periods for the SBO function,
SBAP function, and CAP function may be found in Appendix D-4.

3.3   STAFFING LEVELS

Forty-four programs (83 percent) reported operating their SBOs with two or fewer full-time
equivalents (FTEs) as shown in Table 3-4; five programs reported zero FTEs.  Texas is a
significant exception, with 41 FTEs serving the SBO function. All programs reported 98.15
FTEs in the SBO function.

In 2000, 37 programs (70 percent) operated their SBAPs with four or fewer FTEs, which
includes both paid and unpaid staff and may include retired engineers. Notable exceptions
to these staffing levels include Indiana and Louisiana, which reported using 12 and 13 FTEs,
respectively, to support their SBAP function. Also, Texas reported the services of 70 unpaid
"EnviroMentors" who assist with SBAP duties, for 111  FTEs supporting Texas' SBAP. All
programs reported 260.05 FTEs in the SBAP function.

Specific details on program staffing levels forthe SBO and SBAP functions may be found in
Appendix D-5.
                                     3-4

-------

• • ' • . - .':. '- -••;• -i ',-•:• ... . •':
.••'••'.:•• • - . - IABLE3-* .-->": :•.'•-..'••:'•' '.',-- \' ;
2000 STAFFING LEVELS (as FTEs?) SERVING THE SBO & SBAP FUNCTIONS
#FTEs
0
0.01 - 1
1.1 -2
2.1 -3
3.1 -4
4.1 -5
5.1 -6
6.1 -7
12
13
41
111
Not applicable, no response2
TOTAL
# Programs
SBO
5
29
10
2
1
1
1



1

3
53
SBAP
1
11
11
10
5
4
3
2
1
1

1
3
53
Note 1: An FTE is considered to work 40 hours/week. For example, two people working 20 hours/week would be
      equivalent to one FTE.
Note 2: SBO - Alaska, Massachusetts, Rhode Island. SBAP - California, Delaware, Massachusetts.

Twenty-seven programs (51 percent), compared to 28 last year and 30 in 1998, reported that
at least the required seven members have been appointed to their CAPs. An overview of
CAP appointments is shown in Table 3-5. In CAPs with fewerthan seven members, several
programs indicated that expired terms on their CAPs have not yet been filled or that their
CAPs have not yet been established. Program statistics of the number of CAP members in
each category (small business, state agency, general public, not yet appointed, other) may be
found in Appendix D-6.
                                       3-5

-------
.--. -"•• ••'••--••'-'•••';"•-..- .•'•'•' ,;. '':.'. - TABLES* :'•-• *v".;:'-v '':.;:-f ?'•*'* ?£?'-.. • ,- *..--'•
" ,' , , - - /- •. - •: - v," -:" ' ' GAPAPPOINTMefES^^* -•-.:*£.#&;• ":' ; - 1..V; ,-

Minimum 7 members appointed
Less than 7 members appointed 1
Not applicable, no response
# Programs
27
20
6
% Programs
51
38
11
Note 1: Seven programs indicated that appointments are pending.


3.4   ADMINISTRATIVE LOCATION OF SBO AND SBAP COMPONENTS

As shown in Table 3-6, 48 programs indicated that their SBOs are located within a
state/territory-related agency, typically the environmental agency. The majority of programs
(47) report to have located their SBAPs within a state/territory-related agency, typically the
environmental agency. Six programs (Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and
Rhode Island) contracted all or part of their SBAP function to an outside agency or university.
As defined in Section 507, the CAPs are to be independent entities, operating outside of any
agency.
,. "• , •::'•• -,. -;-->--o>:.- ••••--/,;-. "TABLE 3-6 ;: •' :>'''* :-";:; ' ' v • '-
ADMINISTRATIVE LOCATIONS OF SBO AND SBAP
Location
State-related agency
University-related (contracted)
Private contractor
Mixed1
Not applicable, no response2
TOTAL
SBO
# Programs
48



5
53
% Programs
91



9

SBAP
# Programs
47
2
1
3

53
% Programs
89
4
2
6


Notel:  Iowa, Nevada, Rhode Island.
Note 2:  Alaska, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virgin Islands.
Note 2:  Massachusetts, Vermont.

As indicated in Table 3-7, 21 SBOs are located in a regulatory section within their agency,
and 27 SBOs are housed  in a nonregulatory section. Twenty-seven SBAPs reported their
                                       3-6

-------
location in a regulatory section, 25 indicated nonregulatory, and one program (California)
reported association with both regulatory and nonregulatory offices. Some programs feel that
location in a nonregulatory section of an agency may be less intimidating to small businesses
than dealing with staff that are part of an enforcement section.
".",''" .- ,-'''' ,' • •',-;''• TABLE 3-7t •- ' ; -, 'VV ;-' -
REGULATORY / NONREGULATORY LOCATIONS OF SSO AND SBAP

Regulatory
Nonregulatory
Mixed1
Not applicable/No response2
TOTAL
SBO
# Programs
21
27

5
53
% Programs
40
51

9

SBAP
# Programs
27
25
1

53
% Programs
51
47
2


Motel: California.
Note 2: Alaska, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virgin Islands.
Complete information for the administrative location of each SBO, SBAP, and CAP may be
found in Appendix D-7.
                                       3-7

-------
                    4.0 SBTCP ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES

Information regarding the activities and services of the SBTCPs is provided in this section.
Industry sectors assisted by the SBTCPs are discussed in Section 4.1.  An overview of
SBTCP activities and services is provided in Section 4.2. SBTCP assistance requests are
outlined in Section 4.3.  CAP activities are outlined in Section 4.4. Financial assistance
programs are described in Section 4.5 A discussion of how programs minimize duplication
through cooperative efforts may be found in Section 4.6.  SBTCP efforts to comply with the
intent of the Paperwork Reduction Act, Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to
Justice Act are summarized in Section 4.7.

Beginning with the 1998 reporting year, information on SBTCP services to specific industry
sectors was gathered under a new format designed to make the resulting data more complete
and meaningful.   Please refer to the Reporting Form in Appendix A for the questions
pertaining to program activities and services.

4.1   INDUSTRY SECTORS ASSISTED BY THE SBTCPs

Programs were asked to report on their assistance to 72 industry sectors in eight assistance
categories.  The  industry sectors and assistance services into which programs could
categorize their efforts were standardized in 1998. Not all states kept information as to
industry sectors assisted or total assists provided. Notes on data calculation are included with
the various data tables in the appendices.

Fifty-one SBTCPs (96 percent) provided information on  the types of industry sectors and
number of facilities that their programs assisted in 2000; data from county and air district
programs were included with their state's activities.

The top ten industry sectors receiving SBTCP assistance  (by number of assists) in 2000 are
shown in Table 4-1.
                                      4-1

-------
:: ,: "' .*•'• "' • ' ' . '•••• ""I**.: . : • '" TABLE4rf^-^ '''?>.. >f? < • :- . ' " / : - -- '-'-"-f^-, .
; ^ropm»rousT^ , ;;^
Industry Sector
Other (not classified)*
Cross Sector*
Auto/Body Maintenance, Repair, Refinishing*
Government*
Dry Cleaning/Laundry Services*
Metal Fabricating/Finishing
Printing/Graphic Arts
Organizations/Associations*
Gasoline Distribution (wholesale/retail)
Agriculture/Farming/Crop Service
# Assists
1,614,775
287,086
63,000
44,661
27,005
16,356
9,560
7,482
6,335
5,918
Note *: Also in the top 10 in 1999

The top 10 industry sectors that received assistance from the most programs are shown in
Table 4-2.  Dry cleaning and auto body maintenance have been the two industry sectors
helped by the most programs for the last four years.
- J- '•'"'.'. TABLE 4-2 - . . - '- "' '• " ' '•• "
TOP 10 INDUSTRY SECTORS ASSISTED BY PROGRAMS
Industry Sector
Dry Cleaning/Laundry Services*
Auto/Body Maintenance, Refinishing, Repair*
Other*
Government*
Furniture Manufacturing/Repair/Wood Finishing*
Attomey/Consultant/Engineer*
Metal Fabricating/Finishing*
Printing/Graphic Arts*
Construction/Contractor
Paints and Painting/Coatings
# Programs
41
41
41
39
37
36
34
34
33
33
Note *: Also in the top 10 in 1999.
                                       4-2

-------
The number of businesses reached by industry sector may be found in Appendix E-1. This
same list also has been reordered by the number of states providing assistance (Appendix
E-2). A summary of individual program responses may be found in Appendix E-3.

Programs were asked if they targeted any specific industry sectors for assistance. Forty-two
programs (79 percent) indicated they focused on certain high priority industries. Of the 39
industries mentioned, the following sectors were targeted by at least seven programs, as
shown  in Table 4-3.
'. - ••• ' ' '' '" ' TABLE4-3'' - ~*; '•' •" '' - • ~ '
INDUSTRY SECTORS TARGETED FOR ASSISTANCE
Industry Sector
Dry Cleaning/Laundry Services
Auto/Body Maintenance, Refinishing, Repair
Other
Metal Fabricating/Finishing
Printing/Graphic Arts
Construction/Contractor
Electroplating/Chrome Plating
Agriculture/Farming/Crop Service
# Programs
25
21
13
10
8
7
7
7
4.1.1  Total Businesses Assisted

As tallied by industry sector, SBTCPs reported they provided 2,125,832 assists to businesses
in 2000, which includes 1,250,122 publications by Ohio; without these publications, the total
is 875,710.

Beginning in 1998, the number of businesses assisted was tallied both by industry sector and
eight separate types of assistance. This format more fully captures the true picture of
businesses  assisted by the  programs. Also, many programs have improved  their
recordkeeping strategies, resulting in higher quality and more comprehensive data.

When studying the data, several points should be considered. In general, "total businesses
reached," as reported by each Section 507 program, is used as the "official" count for this

                                      4-3

-------
report. Some programs tried not to double count the number of businesses assisted within
a given industry sector. Two programs did not keep data by industry sector, and only "total
businesses reached" was given. Four programs tracked the types of services they offered
or the industry sectors they assisted, but did not compile data. Two programs did not
respond.

A tally of "total businesses reached," as reported by each program, may be found in Appendix
E-4.

4.2   ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES

An overview of activities and services provided by the SBTCPs is discussed in this section,
including types of outreach activities, publications developed, and notable outreach strategies.

4.2.1  Outreach Activities and Businesses Reached

The number of programs offering specific outreach services plus an aggregate of the number
of businesses reached through these services in 2000 is presented in Table 4-4. These
outreach activities and services are designed to introduce small business people to the
available assistance services and to identify common problems and issues to be addressed
on a more specific basis.

Beginning with the 1998 reporting year, programs reported their outreach statistics for their
SBO, SBAP, and CAP combined. Information was requested by the type of assistance (e.g.,
hotline, on-site visit, etc.) and by industry sector served. The types of outreach activities and
industry sectors on which programs could report were standardized.
                                      4-4

-------

OUTREACH ACTR
... , ," .-'•'• ' "••-.- -.-•-",. . ; (byriuB
ACTIVITY
Seminars/Workshops
On-site visits
Hotline
Mailings
Publications
Other
Home page2
Teleconferences

TABLE 4-4
/ITIES AND BUSH
tber of programs
# Programs
47
47
46
43
39
34
29
19
"" ' „ ' " "-: - - , -'i
JESSES REACHE
offering)?" >''<"*."
% Programs
89
89
87
81
74
64
55
36
- "
D-;^tf?'-'V V;-. "..-'
Total Businesses
Reached1
30,118
9,586
52,985
176,192
1,455,452
247,747
1,245,921
1,281
Note 1: Total businesses reached" is tallied using industry sector assistance data.  Some programs tried not to
      double count.  For example, if one printer called a hotline 5 times, one program may count this as 5, while
      another program may count as 1. Therefore, "total businesses reached" by industry sector will not equal total
      businesses reached by type of assistance.
Note 2: 51 programs reported having web sites under the question directly addressing this issue.

The most common outreach activities, offered by about 80 percent of programs, were:

      Seminars/workshops
      On-site visits
      Hotline
•     Mailings.
These activities remain as the most common services offered by the programs from year to
year.

Detailed information, by program, about the number of occurrences and the number of
businesses reached by each reported activity is presented in Appendix E-5.

4.2.2 New Publications

As noted above, more businesses were reached through publications than through any other
method. Thirty-nine programs reported outreach to almost  1.5 million business through
publications. Programs were asked to provide a list of new documents they prepared in
2000, which may be found in Appendix E-6.
                                        4-5

-------
Examples of the types of publications produced include:


      Fact sheets
      Manuals
      Assistance request forms
      Emission calculation worksheets
      Brochures
      Resource guides and directories
      Dry cleaners' calendar
      Training workbooks and checklists
      Permit guides
      Newsletters
      Posters
      Annual reports
      Technical papers
      Generic compliance plans.

Many programs share publications, adapting one state's publication for their own needs.


4.2.3  Notable Outreach Strategies


Also beginning in 1998, programs were asked to note outreach strategies they found to be

particularly effective in assisting small businesses. Of the 21 strategies noted by the 46
programs (87 percent) that answered this question, the following received mention by at least
10 programs, as shown in Table 4-5.
: , - --. ;-.-•' ••':'• TABLE4-5 '"."-': • " ';--'>/- i .-• ;. '• •'..,..:'".' '"-.
NOTABLE OUTREACH STRATEGIES
Outreach Strategy
Workshops/Presentations
On-site visits
Guidance materials
Partnering with others
Mailings
# Programs
25
15
11
11
11
From year to year, programs have stressed the value of direct contact—primarily via on-site
visits, but also through workshops — in building trust and confidence in the business

community.  Because of their nature, on-site visits and workshops typically reach fewer

businesses than "mass" outreach strategies like mailings and publications.  However,
                                      4-6

-------
programs indicate that the quality of the contacts made through direct interaction between
business owner and technical assistance provider can lead to improved compliance.
Effective outreach strategies as noted by each program may be found in Appendix E-7.

4.2.4 Internet Web Pages

The  number of programs that are using Internet web pages  to disseminate technical
assistance information continues to grow. (Programs are no longer reporting use of electronic
bulletin board services.) Fifty-one programs (96 percent) currently operate home pages, up
from 50 in 1999, 48 in 1998, 41 in  1997, and 28 in 1996.

The types of information available  on these home pages are listed in Table 4-6; detailed
information on the home pages, including web site address, usage, and comments received,
may be found in Appendix E-8.
' ; '' ' '• ••'-."•"'•' ' •• TABLE 4-6 •••'••'' •'' ".-"'-I-'-. <•'•' •" ••""'.' • -: '• • -
INFORMATTON AVAILABLE ON INTERNET HOMEPAGES
Type of Information
CAP information
Emissions inventory
Policies
Calendar of events
Multimedia
List of publications
Pollution prevention information
Permit forms
Permitting information
Regulations
Guidance documents/fact sheets
Links
Contact listings
Program description
Other
# Programs
36
35
33
30
25
21
21
19
15
14
13
11
9
9
7
% Programs
68
66
62
57
47
40
40
36
28
26
25
21
17
17
13
Note*:  Programs with web sites pending: Montana, New Hampshire.
                                      4-7

-------
Internet home pages are efficient mechanisms for SBTCPs to disseminate information to
small businesses, as evidenced by the increasing use of electronic media over the last five
years. Because the Internet is practical for information transfer from the federal SBO and
SBAP, between programs, and to the small business community, and expanded web page
content should continue to be pursued.

4.3   ASSISTANCE REQUESTS

4.3.1  Air-only Versus Multimedia Assistance

Section 507 of the CAA calls forthe establishment of technical assistance programs for air-
related issues. However, a number of states began their programs as multimedia (offering
assistance with water,  solid waste, hazardous waste, etc. in addition to air) and more have
since transitioned their programs to  multimedia assistance, as shown in Table 4-7.
' • ' ' ''•""''!-'"' .= •.;,•*'•" TABLE4-71 - . - ' " '' -- '"''-'
AIR-ONLY VERSUS MULTIMEDIA ASSISTANCE
Assistance Focus
Multimedia
Air-only
# Programs
40
13
% Programs
75
25
An increasing number of programs are offering multimedia assistance (40 this year compared
to 37 in 1999), because their small business clients need it and expect it. Small businesses
appreciate "one stop shopping" for their compliance and technical assistance questions,
ratherthan working through numerous media-based departments. States that offer air-only
assistance cite funding problems in using Section 507 money for non-air issues.

Each program's assistance focus is shown in Appendix D-1.

4.3.2 Types of Assistance

With this consideration, as a new element for the 1998 reporting year, SBTCPs were asked
for data on the type of assistance requested (e.g., regulatory information, permitting,
recordkeeping.etc.). Programs could indicate the number of CAA-related requests and the
number of multimedia requests for assistance.

                                     4-8

-------
Forty-five programs (85 percent) reported data on CAA/multimedia assistance requests
(although five programs had no available data or a mixture of data).  These data are
summarized in Table 4-8.  Individual program responses may be found in Appendix E-9.
                         '•••'.'•*•  -•'.-;    TFABLE4-* -  •-:>-  . '  o' •**-
                       CAA/MULTIMEDIA ASSISTANCE REQUESTS
     Type of Assistance Requested
CAA Requests
Multimedia
 Requests
Total Requests
  Compliance/Regulatory Information
   10,631
  7,981
    18,612
  Monitoring
    474
   165
     639
  Recordkeeping
    1,867
   690
    2,557
  Financial/Funding Information
     380
   521
     901
  Permitting
    5.436
   898
    6,334
  General CAA Information
    1,809
   239
    2,048
 Add to Mailing List
     879
  1,614
    2,493
  P2 Assistance
     578
  1,665
    2,243
 Other
    1,837
  4,018
    5.855
 TOTAL REPORTED REQUESTS*       |     24,060     |     17,377     |      43,364
Note *: Total requests are as reported by the programs. Numbers will not add up, since some programs merely
      indicated they provided a certain type of assistance, but did not provide data. Some did not have data by
      assistance type, but did provide totals.

Requests for compliance/regulatory information far outnumbered any othertype of assistance
request at 18,612 followed by requests for permitting information at 6,334. "Other" types of
information received 5,855 requests.

Businesses made about 6,700 more CAA-related requests for information than they did for
multimedia. Such data are not surprising, since the SBTCPs were established to provide
CAA assistance.  Since 40  programs indicated they  provide full or partial multimedia
assistance, multimedia requests are expected to rise in the coming years.

4.4   CAP ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES

Forty-two CAPs indicated they were operational during the 2000 reporting period; however
49 programs reported activities even though they may not have a CAP or an active panel. The
primary CAP activities were  reviewing and commenting on state legislative actions and
                                        4-9

-------
meeting with small businesses and trade associations (each by 41 CAPs, compared to 21
and 18 programs, respectively, in 1999). These were followed by attending training sessions
(37).

This new focus on reviewing legislation and reaching out to businesses and trade groups
points to the maturing of many CAPs as they turn their focus from administrative details to
dealing more directly with small business issues.

Major activities of the CAPs during the 2000 reporting period are shown in Table 4-9. A
program summary of CAP activities may be found in Appendix E-10.
- - " ,/. • ' • • -v TABLE4-9 - - ' , - 'C^ "
MAJOR CAP ACTIVITIES
Activity
Review/comment on state legislative actions
Meet with small businesses/trade associations
Attend training seminars, conferences, etc.
Appoint staff/elect officers
Review/comment on new/proposed regulations, policies, etc.
Define CAP responsibilities
Review of SBO/SBAP documents
Review of SBTCP outreach efforts
Other
# Programs
41
41
37
35
34
33
28
24
3
% Programs
77
77
70
66
64
62
53
45
6
CAPs continue to raise their participation and visibility in their state's technical assistance
programs. The unique roles and specialized skills of the members make them valuable
resources in the development of the SBTCPs.  Effective communication among the three
components of the programs and among CAPs in all programs will continue to effectively and
efficiently define the role of the CAP and fully maximize the skills of CAP members in assisting
small businesses.

Some states still have not formed their CAPs or do not have operational CAPs due to a slow
appointment/reappointment process. The latter situation is especially a source of frustration
                                     4-10

-------
for SBOs and SBAPs. These states are strongly encouraged to make CAP functionality a
priority.

4.5   FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Information about financial assistance programs offered to small businesses to address
environmental compliance needs (e.g., capital expenses associated with pollution prevention
or control equipment) is provided in Table 4-10.
•- • ' . ;"••-.>•'...«.-.-• .1MBLE440?-. .'•••".=''--':• ' \ •": '
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
States/territories offering grants/loans
Grants/loans offered
8
131
Note 1: Some states/territories offer more than one financial assistance program.

Eight states/territories (15 percent) offered 13 financial assistance programs during the 2000
reporting period, which is unchanged from 1999. Detailed information about these financial
assistance programs is provided in Appendix E-11.

Creative financing mechanisms fulfill a need conveyed to programs by small businesses;
offering financial assistance was a common recommendation made for improving compliance
by SBTCPs themselves.  The number of states/territories that offer some type of small
business financial assistance program has remained fairly consistent over the past several
years. Programs again are encouraged to explore funding opportunities for small businesses
within their state or territory.

4.6   MINIMIZING DUPLICATION OF EFFORTS

Programs  reported on the extent to which they used state/territorial agencies and
departments, organizations, and other resources to  maximize efficiency and minimize
redundancy, as discussed in Section 4.1.1.  Programs also provided information on their
strategies to exchange information and resources with other SBTCPs, which is summarized
in Section 4.4.2.
                                     4-11

-------
4.4.1  Cooperative Efforts

Information provided in this section is vital to understanding how some programs with limited
budgets and resources are functioning. Generally, programs report that all three components
of their SBTCPs recognize the efficiency and value of coordinating their efforts with each other
and with other environmental agency departments, state agencies, and organizations.
Descriptions of programs' cooperative efforts may be found in Appendix E-12.

Fifty programs provided information about cooperative efforts undertaken by at least one
component of their program (Alabama, Alaska, and Connecticut did not respond to the
question.) Programs report coordinating information development and dissemination,
training, and workshops/seminars with other state agencies, Chambers of Commerce, trade
associations, non-profits, universities, public utilities, and  Small Business Development
Centers.  The overall concerns of small businesses are being taken into account, as many
programs provide multimedia information, coordinate outreach with non-air programs, or
intervene on behalf of a small business with other agencies.

4.6.2  Mechanisms for Avoiding Duplication of Efforts Among SBTCPs

Forty-nine programs reported actions to minimize duplication of efforts among SBTCPs, thus
increasing the  overall  cost-effectiveness  of  individual  programs (Alabama, Alaska,
Connecticut, and Massachusetts did not respond to the question. As an example, industry-
specific information developed  by one program would have wide applicability to other
programs involved with similar industries.  Mechanisms that programs employ to avoid
duplication of effort are presented in Table 4-11; program details for this topic are found in
Appendix E-13.
                                     4-12

-------
"••';,' '' : TABLE4-11 ' ," :-• '- •'.' • • ;•' ' '•
SBTCP MECHANISMS FOR AVOIDING DUPLICATION
Mechanism
Communication/networking within SBTCP & state agency
Meetings, conference calls, etc. with SBTCPs in EPA region
Review of EPA documents, contacts with EPA
Information gathering from electronic sources
Review of documents from other public, private, or university sources
Networking through state/regional air groups (e.g., WESTAR)
Subscribe to SBO or government ombudsman listserv
Other
# Programs
49
48
47
45
41
40
33
5
% Programs
92
91
89
85
77
75
62
9
The most common technique (in 92 percent of programs) to avoid duplication of effort was
communicating and networking with SBTCP and state agency personnel via phone, mailing
lists, etc. This was closely followed by contact with other programs within the same EPA
region through conference calls and other means at 91 percent. These also were the most
common techniques in 1998 and 1999.

Gathering information from electronic sources, including Internet use for information transfer,
continues to be one of the most promising mechanisms for avoiding duplication of effort
among programs. Use of this method has remained fairly consistent for the last three years.
Posting information from the federal SBO and SBAP, other private and university sources,
and state programs facilitate efficient use of resources and would  encompass all of the
mechanisms to avoid duplication.  Additionally, 33 programs reported subscribing  to
applicable listservs, an increase from 31 last year. (A listserv is a program that allows users
to mass-distribute electronic mail messages.)

4.7   SBTCP COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 507(d)(2)

Section 507(d)(2) of the CAA requires EPA's SBO to periodically report to Congress on
SBTCP actions to follow the intent of the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal Access to Justice Act. EPA's SBO Office continues
its outreach actions toward assisting the SBTCPs in this effort.
                                     4-13

-------
Key EPA SBO outreach activities under the CAA Section 507(b) pursuant to these statutes
include:

      Conducted educational activities at the EPA SBO Regional Liaison Conference,
      Washington, DC, August 2000.
      Provided information on statutes at the 2000 National/State SBO/SBAP Conference
      in Missoula, MT.
      Responded to telephone hotline inquiries in regard to the three statutes.
      Distributed copies of the three statutes by request to state contacts.
      Provided states with copies of the 1996 Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
      Fairness Act (SBREFA), which strengthens and amends the Regulatory Fairness Act,
      and SBREFA Implementation Guidance documents.
      Offered information on the three above statutes on the small business environmental
      home page.

4.7.1  SBTCP Activities Associated with the Paperwork Reduction Act

Forty-six programs (87 percent) reported specific activities associated with the intent of the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, down from 50 programs in 1999. This Act was
designed to minimize  the burden and maximize the practical utility and public benefit
associated with the collection of information by or for a federal agency.

The most common  action taken to follow the intent  of the provisions of this act was
receiving/providing information electronically (77 percent of programs, the same as last year).
Other activity categories remain fairly consistent as programs continue their efforts to follow
the intent of the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Actions taken by SBTCPs in following the intent of the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act are listed in Table 4-12 and are detailed, by program, in Appendix E-14.
                                      4-14

-------
•^ •''..' ' ''•'. ' " \ "• TABLE 4-12 ^".- •••' ••' ; '•' " " ; ' • -.;; "1-/:", • >"•'-. •/
ACnvrriESTa FOLLOW TOEINTENT OF TOEPAPERWQRK REDUCTION ACT K^
Activity
Receiving/providing information electronically
Routine review of SBTCP documents for compliance
Simplified/consolidated permits or forms
General permits for certain types of industries
Routine review of SBTCP information collection activities
Eliminating unnecessary permits by increasing exemptions
Other
# Programs
41
34
34
33
28
26
6
% Programs
77
64
64
62
53
49
11
4.7.2 SBTCP Activities Associated with the Regulatory Flexibility Act

Forty-four programs (83 percent) reported activities to follow the intent of the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act during 2000, down from 47 programs in 1999. The Regulatory
Flexibility Act requires that when a number of regulations will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, "a regulatory analysis must be performed to
explore options for minimizing those impacts." Those actions most often implemented are
prioritized in Table 4-13.
" ; '' '':; - -'••".. ;-» TABLE 4-13 • .',.'' ' >/^%lv :
. ACTtVmES TO FOLLOWTHE INTENT OF V
THEREGiriiATOR^FLEXIBIUTYACT i"
Activity
Ensure that small businesses can participate in rulemaking
Routine review of SBTCP documents for compliance
Periodic
Amnesty
rule review for impact on small business
program
Other
# Programs
40
33
29
17
6
% Programs
75
62
55
32
11
SBTCPs have played a major role in ensuring awareness of the effects of regulatory
requirements on small businesses as well as promoting environmental compliance in the small
business community.  SBTCP personnel have made significant strides in explaining the
                                     4-15

-------
effects of legislation/regulations on small businesses to regulatory agencies through their role
as mediators between these two groups. As in 1999, the two primary activities reported by
programs in following the intent of the Regulatory Flexibility Act was ensuring that small
businesses can participate in rulemaking (40 programs) and reviewing SBTCP documents
for compliance (reported by 33 programs). SBTCPs continue to be effective advocates of the
small business perspective and have helped negotiate flexible application of regulatory
requirements that provided great benefits to small businesses. Actions taken by SBTCPs in
response to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, by program, may be found in Appendix E-15.

4.7.3 SBTCP Activities Associated with the Equal Access to Justice Act
Thirty-six programs (68 percent) reported specific activities to follow the intent of the
provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act, down from 42 programs in 1999. The purpose
of this Act is to provide certain parties who prevail over the Federal government with covered
litigation in an award of attorneys'fees and other expenses under appropriate circumstances.
Specific actions include reviewing SBTCP documents for compliance (again, the most
common activity, conducted by 26 programs), and reviewing instances where state actions
against small businesses appear unjustified (25 programs).

SBTCP actions to follow the intent of the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act are
shown in Table 4-14 and detailed, by program, in Appendix E-16.
," -•'--,--• , TABLE4-14 .>.'":•••••-- -~ •" •-- *'f- '..-•'
ACTIVITIES TO FOLLOW THEINTENT OF
THE EQUAL ACCESS TCX JUSTICE ACT
Activity
Routine review of SBTCP documents for compliance
Review instances where state actions against small businesses appear
unjustified
Providing funding/technical
actions
assistance for groups aggrieved by regulatory
Other
Pro bono legal services
# Programs
26
25
13
3
2
% Programs
49
47
25
6
4
                                     4-16

-------
                       5.0  PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

Internal and external assessments of SBTCP program effectiveness are reviewed in this
section.  Program goals and evaluation strategies are discussed in Section 5.1. Program
highlights and accomplishments are found in Section 5.2. In Section 5.3, SBTCPs offer tips
and barriers in operating their programs. Success stories and case studies are included in
Section 5.4.

5.1    PROGRAM GOALS

At each national SBO/SBAP conference since 1995, SBTCP representatives have discussed
strategies to measure the success of compliance assistance programs. With the revision of
the SBTCP Reporting Form for 1998, SBTCPs were asked to define and prioritize their own
program goals. They also were asked to discuss strategies to evaluate their goals and the
results of this measurement process.

Programs are at different stages of development and have varying resources. Self-defined
goals allow each program to strive for success and measure its achievements within its
means.

Performance measurement tools can take a variety of forms from simple to sophisticated.

      Methods of tracking number of attendees at events.
      Types of numerical data collected for activities and methods of collection.
      Surveys to measure customer satisfaction  after attending an event or receiving
      assistance.
      Surveys to determine  quality  of  service provided or request  suggestions  for
      improvement.
      Detailed program analysis or evaluation.
      Statistical analysis of return on  investment in program.

Fifty-one SBTCPs indicated their program goals, ranking them in terms of priority. Their
responses are summarized in  Table 5-1.
                                     5-1

-------
." ' • :-"•• / " TABLE5-4 •
PROGRAM GOAL!
Goal
Increase understanding of environmental obligations
Improve compliance rates
Provide site specific compliance assistance
Increase understanding of permitting
Increase understanding of CAA
Other
Encourage self-auditing
"'""''',-,'
*'••', . ..,--. ,.-•-;'., ,.; •;
# Programs
Declaring Goal
(regardless of rank)
40
38
32
21
8
7
5


# Programs
Declaring This
As #1 Goal
28
11
4
4
1
3
1
Increasing understanding of environmental obligations (40 programs) and improving
compliance rates (38 programs) again were the two most frequently listed goals, regardless
of priority ranking. These two goals also garnered the most number one priority rankings, with
28 and 11 programs, respectively, declaring these to be their main goals; they also were the
top two in 1999 and 1998.

5.1.1  Goal Evaluation

Importantly, programs then were asked how they evaluated whether their stated goals were
being met. Programs were encouraged to base their assessments on quantifiable terms,
where possible.  Some programs, still in the developing stage, would need to rely on
qualitative strategies to assess their goal progress.

SBTCPs reported  a variety of strategies to evaluate their program goals. These included:

•     Various customer feedback mechanisms (customer satisfaction/value of service).
•     Questionnaires/satisfaction surveys.
•     Tallies of hotline calls, on-site visits, workshops, etc.
•     Publications developed and distributed.
       Improvements in compliance rates.

Most programs focused on the number of businesses reached and types of assistance
offered to measure their success.
                                      5-2

-------
Finally, programs were asked to describe the results of their measurement process. Many
SBTCPs discussed data and client feedback related to various outreach efforts.  For

example:


•     In Colorado, surveys supply information about how well SBAP served its clients. The
      vast majority of comments have been positive. Some business owners would like
      more and betterwritten materials. Workshop have been effective and the program is
      working to present more workshops to a wider audience.

      Michigan evaluates the quality and effectiveness of its services by reviewing projected
      and actual program objectives and the level of technical assistance provided.  For
      example, the program conducted 29 workshops, exceeding their goal by 45 percent;
      developed 11 new guidance documents, objective 58 percent met with nine finalized
      and two drafts; and 864 responses to requests for technical assistance, objective 96
      percent met; and conducted 15 presentations, meeting its objective.

      In Ohio, surveys indicated that over 98 percent of customers would use the SBAP
      again and would serve as a program reference.  Over 90 percent  indicated that
      completing permit applications would be impossible without SBAP assistance. In
      addition, 99 percent of customers said we explained regulations in  plain English.
      Working regularly with our field offices has resulted in them referring 73 percent of
      onsite visit customers.

Several programs measured improvements in compliance resulting from their technical

assistance efforts.


      Florida distributed its Dry Cleaner Calendars to enable businesses to easily record
      data and notes to meet recordkeeping requirements. In 1996,  the recordkeeping
      compliance rate was  12 percent. Using the calendars as an educational  tool, in
      conjunction with extensive compliance activities at the local level, 2000 compliance
      rates  reached 93 percent.

•     Texas conducted 214  initial compliance site visits and 48 follow-up visits. Applicable
      compliance rates were determined from industry-specific compliance checklists for
      those small businesses that had  initial and follow-up visits.  Compliance rate
      percentages were generated by taking a random sample of the total number of site
      visits conducted.  The  overall average compliance of businesses for all media after a
      site visit is shown on the next page.
                                      5-3

-------
Industry Sector
Auto body, auto repair, auto salvage
Metal finishers
Dry cleaners
Surface coaters
Thermoset resin
Wood products
Printers
Foundries
General
# Site Visits
24
28
18
7
6
6
7
1
65
% Compliance
Pre-site Visit
62
49
56
46
48
51
44
NA
51
% Compliance
Post-site Visit
91
88
97
90
100
87
90
NA
91
Individual program goals and their priority rankings, goal evaluation strategies, and results of
this measurement process may be found in Appendix F-1.

5.2   PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Thirty-six SBTCPs (68 percent) reported on important accomplishments, awards, and
recognitions for their work with the small business community.

The SBTCPs continue to facilitate communication and improve trust between the regulatory
agencies and small businesses. Many programs have forged strong partnerships with such
groups as trade associations, small business development centers, and small business
associations to broaden outreach efforts to the small business community. Many states also
have developed industry-specific initiatives that include compliance manuals, workshops, and
on-site visits.

In this section, a selection of accomplishments are highlighted, with details of program
accomplishments for 2000 provided in Appendix F-2.

      Arizona DEQ created a community assistance program to provide advocacy on
      behalf of all its customers and to provide  better service to rural areas. The program
      is designed  to  meet the  environmental needs of ADEQ's rural customers by
      decentralizing key staff and placing them in the communities they serve where they can
      have more frequent, direct contact with its customers. The community liaisons primarily
      help local residents, businesses, and governments understand and comply with
      environmental requirements. They also provide professional resources for developing
                                      5-4

-------
compliance strategies and infrastructure improvements to increase environmental
quality in less urbanized areas of the state.  The program provides four support
positions, based in the regional offices, to assist the community liaisons in their work.
The support staff provide community outreach services, multi-program technical
coordination, inquiry response and follow-up, compliance assistance, and associated
administrative support to the department's  delegated authorities  and outlying
customers. Through the new community assistance positions, ADEQ expects to
increase productivity in the regions by identifying local needs and responding to them
faster. Though initially limited to compliance and permitting issues involving drinking
water, wastewater, air quality, and solid waste, the community assistance program
eventually will include all environmental issues.

Kansas' move to multimedia was necessary to meet client needs and to continue the
success of the program. SBAP placed a branch office in the Wichita/Sedgwick County
to provide greater local assistance to industries in that area, greatly increasing
program visibility and decreasing travel expenses for the program.

2000 was a record yearforthe program, with both hotline calls and on-site assistance
increasing nearly 50%, from 685 calls from clients  and over 60 visits to individual
businesses, respectively.

While many businesses call about regulatory concerns, by combining the P2 and
SBAP services,  clients were provided with comprehensive compliance assistance
while  still being exposed to P2 concepts.  Several  businesses have implemented
EMSs because of the highly successful workshops, manuals, and assistance provided
by the technical assistance component of the program. EMS encourages not only
environmental compliance but P2 as well.  This program strives to network with other
agencies that provide environmental assistance plus general business assistance
(such as the SBA, SBDCs, and the KS Department of Commerce and Housing). This
networking (which works both ways in referrals) provides businesses with accurate
information "the first time" and eliminates their need to search phone directories.

The SBAP partnered with the Wichita Water and Sewer Department and the Photo
Marketing Association to introduce silver and mercury P2 and recovery technologies
to medical and dental clinics, and commercial imaging and photo processors.  The
program found approximately 70% of local dentists have documented implementation
of such processes.

To address non-point source pollution,  Kansas adopted the US Department of
Agriculture's Home*A*Syst materials.  This program is designed to help people
identify environmental risks in their homes and surrounding property and is useful for
both urban and rural populations. The program has been well received, with education,
training, and outreach efforts continuing  throughout the state. Many cooperative
extension agents now promote the program and materials, including the abbreviated
home self-evaluation form, while the office  continues to facilitate the program.
Documents now are available on the Home*A*Syst web page, with said materials
being used by other state programs.

Minnesota's SBAP was restructured from an air quality program that provided some
multimedia assistance to an officially recognized full multimedia program within the
agency. This change also included the development of an agency-wide memorandum
of understanding that authorizes SBAP to provide confidential compliance assistance
within all environmental media. Minnesota was one of 10 states to receive a Section

                                5-5

-------
507 Grant from EPA. The grant will be used to conduct and measure the effectiveness
of a sector-based, nonregulatory, compliance assistance initiative within the state's
fiber reinforced plastics industry.

New Hampshire's program continues to be warmly received by the business
community. The program continues to reach into new business sectors as regulations
are promulgated and affect increasing numbers and types of businesses.  Staff
continue to  see more referrals from other media  programs to  provide holistic
assistance to small businesses. New Hampshire was one of three states awarded
grants to implement the PrintSTEP program at the state level. This grantwill allow the
program to accelerate multimedia outreach and compliance assistance efforts to this
important industry sector. This will be the third major industry sector to benefit from the
state's goal of providing multimedia assistance to businesses.

North Carolina's most significant accomplishment this year was  a new web site,
which is built around an Oracle database with dynamic active server pages (.asp). The
web site features a one-stop location for all permitting data. The permit database can
be searched by keyword search, user category, subject area, and Division.  The
search function provides up to 20 attributes for each permit including downloadable
application forms, fee pages, regulations, contact information, and specialty
information, such as emission estimation spreadsheets. Users can track their permit
application status for permits in progress across all divisions. The one-stop permit
coordination program provides a single point of contact for a company to identify
requirements, work with permitting agencies to apply for necessary permits, and track
the permit throughout until a permit decision is made. North Carolina expanded its
marketing efforts to let small businesses know of this multimedia assistance.

Pennsylvania's Pollution Prevention Assistance Account was implemented and the
application process was streamlined to improve the process. This low-interest loan
program is available to small businesses that want to  undertake P2 and energy
efficiency projects. The Pollution Prevention/Energy Efficiency Site Assessment Grant
Program was implemented and the application process was streamlined. Eligibility
now allows for any DEP permit holder to apply for the grant. This program provides up
to $5,000 to small businesses or $15,000 to any DEP permit holder that wants to hire
a private consultant to conduct a P2/E2 assessment.

The Virgin Islands program has almost completed inspections of automobile repair
and refinishing shops on St. Croix. They began inspections on St. Thomas/St. John,
but now work is on hold due to lack of personnel on St.  John to do the on-site
assessments.

Wyoming is especially excited about progress on its Compliance Assistance Grant
Project as well as the Clean Snowmobile Challenge design competition that they are
actively supporting.  Both projects have great potential to enhance environmental
performance of businesses in the state as well as the quality of the environment.
                                5-6

-------
5.3   TIPS AND BARRIERS


At the request of the SBTCPs, a new section was added to the Reporting Form for sharing

tips or barriers first developed or recognized by a program. Twenty-seven programs (51

percent) shared their suggestions. The most common theme of suggested tips, of the wide

variety that were offered, was partnering with other programs and organizations, mentioned

by eight SBTCPs.


      Since Maine's SBAP has only two staff, they use the skills and expertise of staff from
      other programs and organizations to assist in delivering services.

      In New Hampshire, partnering with city code and building officials is a valuable way
      to "get the word out" and to identify additional businesses. Code and building officials
      are quite knowledgeable about the types of businesses in their area and are more than
      willing to partner with programs that can augment their knowledge. In addition, as most
      towns and cities require some type of permitting before construction begins, this is an
      excellent time to advise businesses operators of environmentally-related issues that
      are usually less expensive during the planning process than after construction.

      Oregon's Business Assistance Program has found that working with suppliers is a
      good way to reach small businesses.  A representative from Sherwin Williams has
      been very helpful in referring customers that may need air permits.


Less frequently mentioned tips include:


      Translate materials into applicable languages.

      Conduct on-site visits to learn how small businesses do things.


SBTCPs also were asked to identify barriers to their work. The most commonly mentioned
was lack of funding/resources, mentioned by eight programs.


      The District of Columbia indicated that Section 507 still is an air-based program and
      can only be funded by Title V permit monies.

      Minnesota cites funding as a barrier, both the amount and flexibility to use the funds
      for  non-air activities.


A complete list of each program's tips and barriers may be found in Appendix F-3.
                                      5-7

-------
5.4   SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE STUDIES


Another new addition that began with the 1998 reporting year is the request for success

stories and case studies. These can serve as strong examples of a program's effectiveness

and provide insight and inspiration to other small businesses and SBTCPs. Thirty-two
programs (60 percent) shared their success stories or case studies.


Several success  stories are included below.  Success stories and case studies from all
programs may be found in Appendix F-4.


•     A small company contacted the Louisiana SBAP to ensure they were meeting all
      appropriate federal and state rules.  The SBAP provided them with an air permit
      application and modifications, fact sheets for various federal rules, and a pollution
      prevention audit at their request. As a result of the suggestions from the engineer, the
      company reduced their hazardous waste generation by at least 1400 pounds peryear.

      Maryland SBAP helped a printer to apply for the air permit required to begin
      operation.  This helped the company receive their permit in the time frame they needed
      to start their operations.

•     New York implemented regulations for perc dry cleaners that went beyond the federal
      NESHAP regulation to reduce the potential for exposure to perc vapors. In evaluating
      alternative solvents for perc, the SBAP discovered that a new solvent, DF 2000,
      contains almost no Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) and has a flash point above 140
      F. Advances made to the dry cleaning machines that use this solvent reduce any
      potential for fire hazard.   SBAP made dry cleaners aware of this alternative
      compliance option via newsletter articles, hotline calls, and workshops.

•     Oklahoma continues its success with site visits, as technical assistance providers
      prefer to have face-to-face meetings with clients, tour their facilities, and provide
      assistance from this vantage point. The state started an innovative program for metal
      finishers by scheduling facility enforcement inspections (either RCRA or Air) and
      inviting them to participate in the Compliance  Achievement Program. If a facility
      elected to  participate, the inspection was postponed until compliance assistance was
      provided.

      When  dry cleaners were having problems  passing a new Dry Cleaner Superfund
      program test, Tennessee's SBAP developed a test prep course and materials. Dry
      cleaners are now passing the test.

      West Virginia SBAP assisted a client who was conducting stack testing pursuant to
      a Consent Order. The SBAP noted that dioxin and furan testing was included in the
      facility's stack test protocol, but was not a requirement of the permit or the Consent
      Order. I n fact, the tests were listed by the testing company in error, and a revised stack
      test protocol was issued.  This saved the client between $2000 -$3000.
                                      5-8

-------
                   6.0 COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE ISSUES

Each year, EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) requests
information on the SBTCPs' effectiveness in providing compliance assistance to small
businesses.  Common compliance problems are discussed in Section 6.1.  Compliance
issues in particular industry sectors are identified in Section 6.2.  Recommendations to
facilitate compliance are outlined in Section 6.3.  Program confidentiality issues are
discussed in Section 6.4. Finally, in Section 6.5, information is provided on the use of EPA's
Small Business/Small Communities Policy.

6.1    COMMON COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS

Fifty (94 percent) SBTCPs provided insight on compliance issues addressed while providing
technical assistance to  small  businesses.   Common  compliance problems, listed by
decreasing occurrence for 2000, are shown in Table 6-1 and are compared with responses
from 1999 and 1998. Responses for 2000 are detailed, by program, in Appendix G-1.
                                    6-1

-------
• - : /'''.:'/ ' ^TA^LE6-f 'Iv^.v • '•;• 'i:;:':-'- • . '." ,'• ''\l\'y-\
COMMON COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS X t-

Compliance Problem
Not understanding regulatory
requirements
Incomplete recordkeeping
Uncertain how to determine emission
inventories/lack of technical expertise
Uncertain how to complete
forms/complicated paperwork
Uncertain of permitting requirements
Fear of regulatory agency or arbitrary
enforcement
Operating without a permit
Improper storage/disposal of hazardous
waste
Financing for pollution control
requirements
Operating outside NSPS or MACT
Failure to use proper equipment to comply
with applicable standards
Other
2000
#
Program
s
50
46
46
46
43
42
40
28
26
22
13
6
%
Program
s
94
87
87
87
81
79
75
53
49
42
25
11
1999
#
Program
s
52
51
50
48
48
46
40
30
23
24
18
3
%
Program
s
98
96
94
91
91
81
75
57
43
45
34
6
1998
#
Program
s
51
48
45
42
42
46
42
25
24
22
18
5
%
Program
s
96
91
85
79
79
87
79
47
45
42
34
9
Not understanding regulatory requirements, incomplete recordkeeping, uncertainties in how
to complete paperwork, and a lack of technical expertise again are noted as virtually universal
compliance problems. Identifying key problems and gaps in understanding by the small
businesses have helped the SBTCPs to best target their assistance efforts.

6.2   COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS IN PARTICULAR INDUSTRY SECTORS

Added to  the reporting process  in 1998, programs were asked to indicate if certain
compliance problems were prevalent in any particular industry sector. Twenty-one programs
(40 percent) indicated at least one industry sector. Their responses are summarized in Table
6-2 and shown in full in Appendix G-1.
                                     6-2

-------
''•-•.'"•' • ' •• • TABLE £-2 /- . '' ' '' :
COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS IN INDUSTRY SECTORS
Compliance Problem
(# programs indicating problem)
Not understanding regulatory requirements
(6)
Operating without a permit (6)
Incomplete recordkeeping (12)
Uncertain of permitting requirements (5)
Uncertain how to determine emission
inventories (6)
Uncertain how to complete forms (4)
Lack of financing (5)
Operating outside NSPS/MACT (6)
Improper storage of hazardous waste (4)
Fear of regulatory agency (2)
Failure to use proper equipment (1)
Other (1)
Industry Sector Specified
(# programs indicating this sector)
Auto maintenance shops (2)
Dry cleaners (2)
Metal finishers(2)
Printers (2)
Surface coaters (2)
Auto body (3)
Surface coaters (2)
Wood products (2)
Aquaculture(l)
Dry cleaners (1 1 )
Auto body (1)
Auto service (1)
Chrome plating (1)
Foundries (1)
Hazardous waste generator (1)
Metal finishers (2)
Aquaculture(l)
Auto body (1)
Coal/methane production (1)
Surface coaters (3)
Coal prep plants (1)
Crematory (1)
Ready mix concrete (1)
Dry cleaners (2)
Surface coaters (2)
Auto body (1)
Dry cleaners (2)
Auto body (1)
Degreasers(l)
Fiberglass (1)
Dry cleaners (4)
Furniture stripping (1)
Chrome plating (1)
Auto body (3)
Dry cleaning (1)
Surface coating (1)
Dry cleaners (2)
Auto service (1)
Metal finishing (1)
Agriculture (1)
Auto body (1)
Foundries (1)
Metal products (1)
Thermoset resin (1)
Wood products (1)
Chrome plating (1)
Furniture stripping (1)
Metal finishers (1 )
Printing (1)
Metal finishers (1)
Printers (1)
Rock crushing (1)
Surface coaters (1 )
Thermoset resin (1)
Wood products (1)
Coating (1)
Dairies (1)
Woodworking (1)
Small facilities (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Woodworking (1)
Ready mix concrete (1)
Small businesses (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Sandblasters(l)
Small facilities (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Tanks (1)
Solvent cleaning (1)
Wood furniture manuf. (1)
Thermoset resin (1 )
Thermoset resin (1)
Wood products (1)
Printers (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Auto body (1)
Auto service (1)
Dry cleaners (1)
Metal finishing (1)
Printing (1)
Surface coaters (1)
Thermoset resin (1)
Wood products (1)
6-3

-------
Of the 12 categories of compliance problems, the number of categories in which a particular
industry sector appears is shown in Table 6-3.
'.•• ••"• ' '•-'•'• • ".-. TABLE6-3 - <:";%- , - ." . ,, "" "v.\v ' " -- '•-
INDUSTRY SECTOR APPEARANCE IN COMPLIANCE CATEGORIES
Industry Sector
Surface coaters
Wood products/woodworking
Auto body shops
Dry cleaners
Metal finishers
Printers
Thermoset resin
Auto maintenance shops
Chrome plating
Small businesses
Degreasers
Aquaculture
Foundries
Furniture strippers
Ready mix concrete
Rock crushers
Agriculture
Coal methane production
Coal prep plants
Crematory
Dairies
Fiberglass
Hazardous waste generators
Metal products
Sandblasters
Tanks
# of Compliance Problem Categories
11
9
8
8
6
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
                                     6-4

-------
Surface coaters appear in 11 compliance problem categories and was mentioned most often
in 1999 as well. Wood products/woodworking appeared in nine categories followed by dry
cleaners and auto body shops each with eight. These have been among the most frequently
mentioned sectors since 1998.
6.3   RECOMMENDED   CHANGES   TO   FACILITATE  SMALL  BUSINESS
     COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAA

Recommendations made by SBTCPs for changes, at the state orfederal level, to help small
businesses comply with the CAA are summarized in Table 6-4.  SBTCP staff members are
uniquely qualified to make such recommendations, since they address current CAA
compliance problems encountered by small business and attempt to provide effective
solutions. Specific program responses may be found in Appendix G-2.
". . ,- • " ' - • •' TABLE 6-4 ' ..-•"--'•;...•-. ' '
2000 SBTCP RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING COMPLIANCE
Recommendation
Increased funding/continued adequate funding for SBTCPs
Allow flexibility/simplification in applying regulations to small
businesses
Multimedia assistance/P2 emphasis
Simplify paperwork/reporting requirements
Regulations written in plain English
Grants/loans for small businesses
Generic outreach and training materials
Expand/facilitate effective communication between state and federal
agencies
Develop compliance incentives
Develop a national public relations/advertising program
Form a National CAP
SBTCPs as lead program for environmental technical assistance
Conduct on-site assistance
Develop national tracking and reporting database
Develop national recognition program for small businesses
Clean and simple audit privileges/voluntary disclosure policies
# Programs
11
11
10
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
% Programs
21
21
19
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
4
4
2
2
2
2
                                   6-5

-------
Thirty-four programs (64 percent) provided at least one recommendation for changes to
improve small business compliance with the CAA. The priority of responses for 2000 nearly
parallel those of 1999 and 1998.

Continued and increased funding for the state SBTCPs was mentioned by 11 programs as
being the prime recommendation for improving compliance. As previously noted, a number
of states operate with limited budgets and staffs. The personalized approach to technical and
compliance assistance is expensive but has been shown to be effective in reaching the small
business community; 21 percent of state programs believe that adequate financial resources
are vital to continued and expanding high quality service.

Eleven programs also recommended allowing flexibility  and simplification in  applying
regulations to small businesses.  Mentioned by 10 programs, the third most  common
recommendation called for multimedia assistance and emphasizing P2, a suggestion that
mirrors programs shift from providing air-only assistance to multimedia.

6.4   PROGRAM CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

In early 1995, EPA's SBO worked with the SBTCPs and EPA's Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance to reach an agreement regarding the confidentiality of assistance
provided to businesses via the SBTCP.

Programs were asked how they avoid conflicts of interest (COI) and maintain confidentiality,
particularly in those cases where the SBO or SBAP is located within the regulatory agency.

Forty-four programs (83 percent) reported no problems with COI or confidentiality issues
regardless of whether a confidentiality policy is in place. Responses to this question have
remained consistent from year to year. SBTCPs consistently report that, for the most part,
COI and confidentiality are non-issues in operating their programs.

Program structures range from guaranty of confidentiality (more common) to providing no
confidentiality.   For example, assistance programs may be housed in non-regulatory
departments, or a program may refer a business in need of technical assistance to such a
provider that will guaranty confidentiality. Most programs provide for confidentiality of trade
secrets.  Many  programs  have policies that protect small businesses from penalties if
                                      6-6

-------
violations are discovered during the course of their receiving technical assistance. Program
responses to the issue of COI and confidentiality may be found in Appendix G-3.

6.5   USE OF ERA'S SMALL BUSINESS/SMALL COMMUNITIES POLICY

As a new reporting element in 1998, programs were asked if they used EPA's Policy on
Compliance Incentives for Small Businesses (Small Business Policy) ora comparable state
policy for small businesses/small communities. EPA's Small Business Policy, signed May
20, 1996, provides incentives to small businesses to  participate in on-site compliance
assistance programs and to conduct environmental audits. Under this policy, EPA will
eliminate civil penalties provided the small  business satisfies certain criteria.

In 2000, as in 1999 and 1998, few states are making use of EPA's policy or developing their
own, as shown  in Table 6-5.
TABLE 6-5
SMALL BUSINESS/SMALL COMMUNITY POLICY USE
Policy Use
Uses EPA policy
Developed state policy
Uses both EPA and state policy
NA/NR/None/Not used
Small Business Policy Act
# programs
5
10
4
34
Small Community Policy Act
# programs
1
1
0
51
For both small businesses and small communities, SBTCPs then were asked to list:

      The number of small entities qualifying under the policy.
      The number of small entities attempting to use the policy; still under consideration.
      The number of small entities attempting to use the policy, but not qualifying.
      Total dollar amount of penalties reduced.
Only three states reported small businesses using  the policy -  Maine, Oregon, and
Tennessee.  Program responses are summarized in  Table 6-6 and are shown in full in
Appendix G-4. All references to small entities are for small businesses; programs did not
report any use of the Small Communities Policy.
                                     6-7

-------
' . '' " >-'••'.. ",':'\:""- ' TABLEM ' "-V'V-. •''.'.-•'.. .':^"'~ " -- ^ . V"''V :•"..:•
SMALL BUSINESS POLICY ACTIVITIES K
Policy Activities
Small businesses qualifying under the policy
Small businesses attempting to use policy;
still under consideration
Small businesses attempting to use policy, but
not qualified
Total $ amount penalties reduced
Programs Using Policy
# of entities
ME -16
OR -16
TN-12
TN-12
ME-1
TN-1

# Programs Indicating
NA/NR/None/Not used
50
52
51
53
As was seen in 1998 and 1999, the Small Business/Small Communities Policy had little use.
Programs likely are not yet tracking such statistics, as evidenced by the high number of
programs not answering this question.
                                     6-8

-------
        APPENDIX A
2000 ANNUAL REPORTING FORM

-------
                  STATE SMALL BUSINESS STATIONARY SOURCE
                TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
                           ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SBTCP)

                             ANNUAL REPORTING FORM
                          FOR THE PERIOD 1/1/00 TO 12/31/00

                                  OMB NO.: 2060-0337
                              EXPIRATION DATE: 9/30/01
                    *** Completed forms are due by March 1,2001
                                                                    ***
Enclosed is a blank copy of the Annual Reporting Form for the State Small Business Stationary Source Technical and
Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (SBTCP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990. This
Form covers information from January through December 2000 and requests information on each of the three
components of the SBTCP:

       •       Small Business Ombudsman (SBO)
       •       Small Business Assistance Program (SBAP)
       •       Compliance Advisory Panel (CAP)

As you complete this Form, please remember that we are collecting obj ective information on each SBTCP. This report
is not an evaluation of your program.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM

1.      Please complete the web-enabled version of the Form. Do not answer questions by referring to attached
       documents or a previous SBTCP report

2.      You should already collect the information requested on this Form. However, if a question asks for data you
       do not have, please provide a brief explanation of why it is not available. For future reports, you may need to
       revise the statistics that you track.

3.      Each answer block (with the noted exceptions) must contain information to be answered complete.

       If an entire question does not apply to you program, check the box next to the question to indicate it is not
       applicable.

       If part of the question does  not apply, indicate "not applicable", "NA", or another appropriate answer.

       For question 3.1 ONLY, complete the relevant blocks and leave the rest blank.

3.      Once you have completed the Form, please return the disk and a completed hardcopy of the Form in the
       enclosed, pre-addressed mailer.  If this mailer is missing or if you wish to use your own envelope, please
       return the disk and hardcopy to:

4.      At the end of each section, you have three options. You can save and continue to the next section, you can save
       your work and exit the form or you can print that particular page with previously saved data. You can save
       answers at anytime.

5.      Submit your completed form by clicking on the large "submit this form" button on the opening page. Click
       this button only when:

       All answers are complete.
       Answers have been reviewed by all necessary parties.

       Clicking on this button will permanently lock and submit your form.

-------
6.      Once the form is submitted you are given the option of saving or printing the entire form. This is done by
       clicking on the link (Click here to print the entire form or save the form on your local hard drive.) on the
       home page.

WHAT IF I HAVE QUESTIONS?

If you have any comments or questions for how to improve this Form, please call the U.S. EPA Small Business
Ombudsman (EPA SBO) at the numbers listed below. You can reach the SBO Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. (EST). After these hours, you can leave a message on the answering machine, which is connected to the
toll-free 800 number.

       (202) 260-0490 (Telephone)
       (800) 368-5888 (Toll-free Hotline)
       (202) 401-2302 (Facsimile)


WHY IS EPA REQUESTING THIS FORM?

As part of the CAA, the U.S. Congress required that each state and territory establish a Small Business Stationary
Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (SBTCP) to help small businesses comply with
this Act. As part of its reporting requirements to Congress, EPA includes information about the SBTCP programs
using information you provide on this Form. EPA has given the responsibility for this report to its SBO, who uses this
Form as a standard information collection tool.


SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM

•      Gathering information for this report is definitely a team effort! Enlist the help of key contacts from the SBO,
       the SBAP, and the CAP, and ask them to complete applicable sections.

•      One person should take responsibility to complete and submit this Form (most likely the SBO).

•      Refer to last year's Report to Congress and the information you provided on your Reporting Form last year
       when completing this year's Reporting Form.

-------
                                       SECTION 1
                           SOURCE OF THE INFORMATION


This section is designed to collect standardized information about the SBTCPs completing this Form, and whom to
contact if we have questions.


1.1    Name of state, territory, or local agency for which this report is being submitted.
1.2    Who should be contacted (primary and alternate contacts) if there are any questions
       regarding the information contained in this Form?

       For the question "Relationship to SBTCP," we would like to know the relationship of that person to the
       SBTCP program (i.e., CAP Chairperson, SBO, etc.). Be sure to include the area code for the telephone and
       facsimile numbers, and also a telephone extension if appropriate.

Name
Title
Relationship to SBTCP
Organization
Address
Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone Number
Facsimile Number
E-mail
Hotline (national? state?
toll free?)
Internet home page
PRIMARY CONTACT












ALTERNATE CONTACT













-------
                                         SECTION 2
                   STATUS, BUDGETS, STAFFING, ORGANIZATION


This section is designed to collect four types of standardized information about your state's SBTCP: Status, Budgets,
Staffing Levels, and Organization. The information you provided in last year's report will be helpful in answering the
questions in this section.


STATUS

2.1    When was your SBTCP established?

       Please note that in Question 2.2, we are asking when each component of your SBTCP was began to operate
       (provide services), which may be different.
SBTCP Component
SBO
SBAP
CAP
Month and Year of Establishment



2.2    When did the SBTCP begin to provide operations (month and year)?

       To be consistent, for the SBO, indicate the effective date of appointment; for the SBAP, indicate the date it
       began providing assistance to small businesses; and for the CAP, indicate the date of the first meeting — even
       if not all members of the CAP were appointed by the time of the first meeting.
SBTCP Component
SBO
SBAP
CAP
Month and Year Operations Began



BUDGETS

2.3
Please provide summary information on the funding for each component of your SBTCP
(for the period January through December 2000). Please indicate the source of funding.

For example, sources of funding might include:  Title V fees, specific appropriation of state funds, the
operating budgets of existing programs, or some combination of sources.

These budgets should include direct salaries, fringe benefits, materials & supplies, etc.
To keep it simple, please round your budgets to the nearest $100.

If budgets are combined for 2 or for all components of your program, please indicate.

-------

SBO
SBAP
CAP
TOTAL
2000 BUDGET ($)




SOURCE OF FUNDING (please describe)




2.4    What was your SBTCP's budget in 1999? What is the expected SBTCP budget during the
       next reporting period (January through December 2001)?

       As with the previous question, please round all numbers to the nearest $100. If these programs did not exist
       (or were not active) in 2000, please indicate. Also, please indicate if any program budgets are combined.

SBO
SBAP
CAP
TOTAL
1999 BUDGET ($)




2001 PROJECTED BUDGET ($)




2.5    Briefly describe any significant changes of more than 10 % in the level of funding between
       the 1999,2000, and 2001 annual budget periods.

       For example, a previous period may have seen a high level of fines that were credited to the SBTCP program,
       perhaps Title V revenues were lower than projected, or state appropriations may have been reduced or
       eliminated.
STAFFING

With these questions, we want to know how many people support each component of your SBTCP.

2.6    How many people, measured as full-time equivalents (FTEs), support the SBO?

       Please complete this question for the staffing levels that are current as of December 2000.  An FTE is
       considered to work 40 hours/week.  For example, 2 people working 20 hours/week would be equivalent to
       1 FTE. It is possible that the SBO has other responsibilities and does not perform this function on a full time
       basis.  For example, if they perform this function approximately 20 hours/week (or 50% of their time), this
       would be equivalent to an 0.5 FTE.
SBO Function
SBO
Other staff
TOTAL STAFF
Number of FTEs




-------
2.7    How many people, measured as full-time equivalents (FTEs), support the SBAP? How
       many of these people are paid or serve as unpaid volunteers? How many of these people
       are retired engineers?

       Please complete this question for the staffing levels that are current as of December 2000.  Use the same
       definition for an FTE as discussed in Question 2.6.  We want to know if the programs use unpaid volunteers
       as well as "retired engineer"programs (or their equivalent) to support the SBAPs.
SBAP Staff
Paid
Unpaid Volunteers
TOTAL STAFF
Number of FTEs (including retired engineers, paid or unpaid)



Retired Engineers
Paid
Unpaid Volunteers
TOTAL RETIRED
ENGINEERS
Number of FTEs



2.8     How many people are currently serving on your CAP?

        Please indicate how many people have been appointed to your CAP as of December 2000. Please indicate
        each CAP member's affiliation (i.e., small business, state regulatory agency, general public, etc.)

        If appropriate, indicate the number of people who have not been appointed to your CAP as of December
        2000.

        When complete, this table should list a total of at least 7 people (including  appointed and not yet
        appointed).
AFFILIATION
Owner (or representative) of small business
State regulatory agency
General public
Not yet appointed
Other (please specify)
NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON CAP






-------
ORGANIZATION
2.9    Please briefly describe where each component of your SBTCP is located/organized.

       Please indicate if the component is located in a regulatory agency, another agency, a university, etc. For
       example, in some programs, the SBAP is in the state regulatory agency. If so, please list the name of the
       agency and the appropriate department, division, etc. (for example:   Department  of Environmental
       Protection, Bureau of Waste Management).  Please indicate if the administrative location is regulatory or
       nonregulatory.  Generally, the CAP is independent and is located outside of all agencies, with each
       individual appointed as defined in Section 507. If your SBAP is contracted to an outside organization,
       please complete Question 2.11.
SBTCP
COMPONENT
SBO
SBAP
CAP
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LOCATION



REGULATORY OR
NONREGULATORY?



2.10   Has management of all or part of the SBAP been contracted to an outside organization?

       If YES, please complete Question 2.11.
2.11   What is the outside organization that is operating your SBAP?
SBAP Contractor
Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone Number
Facsimile Number
Project Manager (or principal
point of contact)
2000 Budget
Term of Contract
Portion of Program Under
Contract










-------
2.12   Does your program offer air-only assistance, or has your program moved into multimedia
       assistance?
Air only
Multimedia



-------
                                          SECTION 3

            SERVICES PROVIDED/ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED


3.1     Briefly describe the assistance services of your SBO and SBAP. What is the number of
        eligible facilities, by industry sector, that your program assisted in 2000?

        We are interested in compiling statistics on the types of assistances and number of businesses reached, by
        industry sector, through a variety of assistance services by the SBO and SBAP combined.

        To help you in completing this question, the following tables are provided.

        •       In Table A, please list  the number of each type of service offered and the number of businesses
                reached,  by industry sector,  through various outreach activities.   If you only know the total
                businesses reached per industry sector, please indicate this number in the "total" column in the
                right side of the table.  If you  only have information on the total number of businesses reached by
                various types of outreach activities, please indicate this in the "total" row at the bottom of the table.

               If multiple industry sectors were reached by a particular outreach activity (for example, a permitting
                training program  that was relevant to any industry sector), please place this information in the
                "cross sector" category.

               If you only track whether these activities occurred (and not the specific number of occurrences),
               please simply "check" the appropriate column.

                The number(s) next to each industry sector is its 2-digit (major group) or 3-digit (industry group)
                SIC code.

               In Table B, please indicate the total number of each type of assistance requests you receive by CAA
               requests and multimedia requests.

        Please note that the options for the types of services have been limited. Please classify the services you offer
        into one of these categories.  If no category is suitable,  you can use the "Other" category.  You do not need
        to define what you have placed in  the "Other" category.  The Report to Congress will reflect only these
        categories.

        NOTE: An eligible facility is defined as a stationary source that:

               Is owned and operated by a person that employs 100 or fewer individuals.
               Is a small business concern as  defined by the Small Business Act.
               Is not a major stationary source.
               Does not  emit 50 tons or more per year of any regulated pollutant.
               Emits less that 75 tons per year of all regulated pollutants.

-------

 
e
*
X
Industry Sector (SIC)

^
"-'3

i--s
-". ~s


;^
*"^
* ,


':'^





-1
:. -^

,'„§
.*s


o
^

1 Example Industry (xx)





























a.





























Agriculture/Farming/
|| Crop Service (01, 07)





























1 Airports/Air
Transportation (45)





























1 Analytical/Medical
Instruments (38)





























« Asbestos/Remediation
(17,32)





























1 Asphalt (295)





























	 ' 	 	
Attorney/Consultant/
Engineer (8 1,87)





























Auto/Motor Vehicle
Dealers & Equipment
(55,501)





























Auto/Body
Maintenance.Repair,
Refinishing (75)





























1 Bakeries (546)





























IBoat Manufacturing
(373)





























||
|| Boilers (34, 50)





























II Business Services (73)

-------

















<
Ed
CO
H











in
03
u
JS
O
_=
°3
S
u
e
0
H
u
M
03
e.
E
a
X
09
e
a
3
a.
GQ
01 fi
1- O
ajs


1 e
|^
e
E
1 Industry Sector (SIC)































Chemicals/Products
(28)































|| Communications (48)































« Concrete/Aggregate
(32)































1 Construction/
Contractor
(15,16,17)































??
c
5
0
d































Crushed Stone
Products/Sand &
Gravel (14)































Dairy/Feedlots/
Livestock (02)































|| Degreasers































«Dry Cleaners/Laundry
Services (72 1 )































1 Electronics/Electric
Equipment/Repair
(36, 762)































« Electroplating/Chrome
Plating (347)































« Engines & Turbines
(351)































Food/Beverage
Products & Processing
(20,514)































1 Foundry/Smelter,
Forging, Casting (33)

-------




















<
a
E
H










a Q
J<» Id
111
3 ee
ffl
I.
0)
6
_c
"a
5
S
e
V
"a
H

M
03
0.
e
e
en
B
"5
3
« JS
— 2
O O
"5 "5
0>

-------















<
fid
CO
H












C«
HO
=>BS
CQ
cu
je
O
"a
u
1
1
u
H
DO
£
E
e
E
w
e
1
.a
s
a.
^ SB
a f
C SB
E "^
So
w <-
"5 "5
0>
Hotline
Industry Sector (SIC)






























of
r-
VI
a>
"S
o
CJ
« .^
'5 3 oo
D. a. 01






























Paper Manufacturing &
| Products (26)






























|| Personal Services (72)






























Petroleum Products,
Storage, Pipelines (29,
46)






























|| Phamiaceuticals (283)






























1 Plastic Manufacturing/
Products (308)






























I Plumbing/HVAC(171)






























1 Printing/Graphic Arts
(27)






























|| Private Citizen






























|| Real Estate (65)






























1 Recreation Services
(79)






























1
|| Recycling (509)






























d
ii
"5
&
oi






























(Research & Testing
Facilities/Laboratories
(873)






























|| Restaurants (5 81






























1 Retail/Wholesale Trade
(50,51,59)

-------













<
Cd
03
H












WO
Jcc M
I

M
'5
S
S
1
H
S)
(U
E
e
a
09

a
ss
a.
^ w»
II
1 "2
5 o
s -
1=1
V
1
X
u
|| Industry Sector (S




























I1
1 Rubber Manufactur
Products (30)





























» Sawmills/Logging/
Wood Products (24)





























1 Schools (82)





























-------
Please indicate the total number of assistance requests your program receives by Clean Air Act
requests and multimedia requests.
TABLE B
TYPE OF ASSISTANCE REQUESTED
Compliance/Regulatory Information
Monitoring
Recordkeeping
Financial/Funding Information
Permitting
General CAA Information
Add to General Mailing List
P2 Assistance
Other
TOTAL
TOTAL # OF REQUESTS
CAA Requests










Non-air/Multimedia
Requests










3.2    Please list any high-priority industry sectors that your program targeted for assistance
       during this reporting period.
3.3    Briefly describe any outreach methods that were particularly effective for your program
       and why (e.g., number of businesses reached, cost effectiveness, improvements in
       compliance).

-------
3.4   Please provide a list of new documents that were prepared and distributed by your
      program during this reporting period. List industry sector, if applicable.
3.5   If your SBTCP services include an Internet home page, please list the information that
      is accessible.
Information Available Through
Home Page
Program description
Contact listings
Copies of regulations
Permitting information
Permit forms
Emission inventory
Policies
Guidance documents, fact sheets, etc.
Information on P2 options
Multimedia
List of available publications
CAP information
Calendar of events
Links to related sites
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes















       Do you ask for feedback on your web site? If so, what are your most common comments?

-------
      How many times was your home page accessed during the 2000 reporting period?
COMPLIANCE ADVISORY PANEL

3.6    What were the major activities of the CAP during this reporting period?
Major CAP Activities
Review of documents for readability and/or content
Appointment/hiring of staff and/or election of officers
Review/advisement on SBO/SBAP outreach activities
Review/comment on new/proposed regulations
Review/comment on state legislative actions
Defining CAP responsibilities
Attendance by CAP members at training sessions
Meeting with small businesses/associations
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes









OTHER SERVICES/CONDUCT OF ACTIVITIES

3.7   Does your program have or is your program planning a grant or loan program to assist
      small businesses comply with the CAA?
   YES
   NO
      If YES, please indicate the date (month/year) such a grant or loan program became/will
      become available and the funding levels for each.
DATE
AVAILABLE



GRANTOR
LOAN?



NAME OF PROGRAM



FUNDING LEVEL




-------
3.8    Briefly describe the types of cooperative efforts that each component of the SBTCP has
       in place.  How are you partnering with others?

       This question is critical to understanding how some programs, with limited budgets and resources (typically
       with the SBAP and SBO components) function. For example, what types of cooperative efforts are in place
       with personnel from other departments, agencies, or organizations?
SBTCP COMPONENT
SBO
SBAP
CAP
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATIVE EFFORTS



3.9    How does your program avoid duplication of efforts with SBTCPs in other states or
       territories?

       We want to find out to what extent programs share or exchange information with SBTCPs in other states and
       territories. For example, did other programs develop factsheets or information packets that your SBTCP used
       (with minimal editing)?
Strategy to Avoid Duplication of Efforts
Communication/networking within own SBTCP and state agency
personnel via phone, e-mail, mailing lists, etc.
Meetings, conference calls, and other contacts with SBO/SBAP
personnel within EPA region
Networking through state or regional air group meetings (such as
WESTAR-Western States Air Resources)
Review of EPA documents/contacts with EPA
Review of documents from other public, private, and/or university
sources
Information gathering from electronic sources
Subscribe to SBO listserve or government ombudsman listserve
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes









-------
3.10   Please indicate what actions were initiated by your SBTCP/CAP to follow the intent of the
       provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Equal
       Access to Justice Act.

       The CAP is responsible for critiquing how well the SBTCP follows the intent of the provisions of these three
       federal acts.  To make it easy to complete this question, various possibilities for each Act are listed in the
       tables below. Please add additional items as appropriate.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
Routine review of information collection activities conducted by SBAP
to ensure the information request is not duplicative or unnecessarily
burdensome
Routine review of SBTCP documents for compliance
Receiving/providing information electronically
Simplified/consolidated permits or forms
Eliminating unnecessary permits by increasing exemptions for
insignificant actions
General permits for certain types of industries
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes







REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT
Ensure that small businesses are allowed to participate in
ruiemakings that have an effect on them
Ensure that aU existing rules periodically are reviewed to determine
their impact on small businesses and changed as necessary
Routine review of SBTCP documents for compliance
Amnesty program
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes





EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
Routine compliance review of SBTCP documents
Review of instances where state actions against small businesses
appear unjustified
Pro bono legal services
Funding/technical assistance for groups aggrieved by regulatory
actions
Other (please list)
Please check appropriate boxes






-------
                                          SECTION 4
                                PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS


These questions are designed to collect information about program goals, measurement of effectiveness, and results.
4.1     What are your program's goals?

        Please indicate up to 3 choices, but number in terms of priority.
     RANK
PROGRAM GOAL
                I  I i! I ! I ! ! I'l I : i i  1 I i 1 I I ! I I I! I I I I i I I ! j I 11 11 I  C ! 1 ]  II
4.2     How are you evaluating whether your above-stated goals are or are not being met?

        For example, you may use questionnaires, statistics on the number of businesses helped in a certain manner,
        the number of new permits issued, etc.  Ideally, your goals and assessment strategies will be stated in
        quantifiable terms (e.g., The SBTCP -will target 2 business sectors through mailings, seminars, and on-site
        assistance to increase their rate of permit filings by 50%.). Your program may still be at the stage -where your
        goals are of a more general nature (e.g., The SBTCP will provide services to small businesses through a
        hotline, on-site visits, seminars, etc.).

-------
4.3    What are the results of this measurement process?

       Did your SBTCP meet its program goals? Did the measurement system work?  What statistics or comments
       did your SBTCP gather to indicate that your goals have or have not been met?
4.4    Please feel free to include any information about your program that you would like to
       highlight (i.e., significant accomplishments, awards, recognitions, move to multimedia,
       etc.).

-------
4.5   Please share any tips or barriers first developed or recognized by your program (e.g.,
      Tips: Performance based reporting ideas. Barriers: Legislative mandate for appointing
      CAP and potential conflict with reporting process).
4.6   Success stories/case studies are strong examples of a program's effectiveness. Please
      share any success stories/case studies, including type of business(es) helped, existing
      problems, outreach methods used, improvements in compliance, etc.

-------
                                        SECTION 5
                              COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE


5.1    What are the most common compliance problems identified by the facilities?

       In the course of providing technical assistance, what have been the most common compliance issues
       addressed?  Examples of compliance problems may include incomplete reports, lack of permits for new
       equipment or changes in processes, operating outside of Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)
       or New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), or unpermitted emissions. Please indicate if certain problems
       are prevalent in any particular industry sector. A number of possible answers are listed below. Please check
       all those appropriate.
Common Compliance Problems
Not understanding regulatory requirements
Operating without a permit
Incomplete recordkeeping
Uncertain of permitting requirements/need for multiple permits
Uncertain how to determine emission inventories/general lack of
technical experience
Uncertain how to complete forms/complicated paperwork
Lack of financing for pollution control equipment/technologies
Operating outside NSPS or MACT
Improper storage/disposal of hazardous waste
Fear of regulatory agency/arbitrary regulatory enforcement
Failure to use or find the right equipment to comply with applicable
standards
Other (please list)
Any specific
industry
sector?












Please check
appropriate boxes












       Please list any specific regulations, monitoring, or recordkeeping requirements that are
       particular problems.
       Please add any additional comments you have regarding common compliance problems.

-------
5.2   What changes would you recommend, at either the state or federal level, to assist small
      businesses to comply with the CAA?

      Please list any suggestions you have. We intend to compile the list of recommendations and highlight these
      in the report to Congress.
5.3   Briefly describe how the SBTCP avoids internal or external conflicts of interest (COT) or
      perception that this program may not be confidential. Briefly describe any issues that
      may have developed and how they were resolved.

      In early 1995, EPA's SBO worked with the SBTCPs and EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance
      Assurance to reach an agreement regarding the confidentiality of assistance provided to businesses via the
      SBTCP.

      With this question we want to know how programs avoid COI and maintain confidentiality — particularly
      in those cases where the SBAP is in the regulatory agency.
5.4    Has your program used EPA's Policy on Compliance Incentives for Small Businesses
       (Small Business Policy) or a comparable state policy for small businesses/small
       communities? If so, please provide narrative details on your activities in the boxes below,
       and then complete the table for the period January through December 2000.
                          SMALL BUSINESS POLICY ACTTV1TIES
                         SMALL COMMUNITY POLICY ACTIVITIES

-------

Small
Business
Policy
Small
Communities
Policy
# Small Entities
Qualifying Under
the Policy


# Small Entities
Attempting to Use
Policy, Still Under
Consideration


# Small Entities
Attempting to Use
Policy, But Not
Qualifying


Total $ Amount of
Penalties Reduced


This is the end of the 2000 SBTCP Annual Reporting Form. Thank you, and all contributors, for
the completeness and accuracy of your Report. A copy of the EPA 2000 Report to Congress will
be provided upon its submittal.

-------
           APPENDIX B
FEDERAL SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN

-------
                                 APPENDIX B
          OFFICE OF THE EPA SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN
                   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                 OFFICE OF THE SMALL BUSINESS OMBUDSMAN
                            401 M STREET, NW (2131)
                            WASHINGTON, DC 20460

                                  800-368-5888
                            202-260-0490 (in DC area)
                                202-401 -2302 (fax)
The Office of the Small Business Ombudsman serves as an effective conduit for small
businesses to access EPA and facilitates communications between the small business
community and the Agency.  The Office reviews and resolves disputes with EPA and works with
EPA personnel to increase their understanding of small businesses in the development and
enforcement of environmental regulations.

The SBO's primary customer group is the nation's small business community. Significant
secondary customer groups  include state and EPA regional small business ombudsmen and
national trade associations serving small businesses.

In response to the identified  needs of the Office's target customer groups, the SBO has
undertaken a variety of major outreach efforts including:

•      Serving as liaison between small businesses and the EPA to promote understanding of
       Agency policy and small business needs and concerns.
•      Staffing a small business hotline that provides regulatory and technical assistance
       information.
       Maintaining and distributing an extensive collection of informational and technical
       literature developed by the various EPA program offices.
•      Making personal appearances as a speaker or panelist at small business-related
       meetings.
       Interfacing on an on-going basis with over 70 key national trade associations
       representing several  million small  businesses and with state and regional ombudsmen
       who serve businesses on the local level. Also in contact with over 450 additional national
       organizations that represent millions of small businesses.
       Providing guidance on the development of national policies and regulations that impact
       small businesses.
The SBO actively seeks feedback on its responsiveness to small business' inquiries and ever-
evolving needs, primarily in the areas of technical assistance and advocacy. The SBO can
"package" relevant information for the most effective and efficient delivery - be it through training
seminars, fact sheets, or position papers — to its target audience.

-------
Individual outreach activities are tracked and reported by the SBO on a monthly basis. Key
statistics include numbers and types of hotline calls and written inquiries; nature and results of
small business advocacy efforts; and personal appearances at conferences, seminars, and
training sessions. Random, informal quality checks of customer satisfaction ensures that
program performance meets or exceeds customer expectations.

The SBO also serves as the Agency's Asbestos Ombudsman. Information concerning
asbestos management may be obtained through the same toll-free hotline service as that which
serves small business needs.

SBO STAFF

EPA's Small Business Ombudsman is Karen V. Brown, who was appointed to this position by
Administrator Lee Thomas in 1985.  In 1988, she was named the Agency's Asbestos
Ombudsman in addition to her small business duties.  Ms.  Brown has served the Agency since
1981 holding a series of management positions.  She is a graduate biologist and chemist.

Robert C. Rose, an Industrial Engineer, joined the Office of Asbestos and Small Business
Ombudsman as Deputy Ombudsman in 1991.  He has over 31 years of management service
with EPA.

Staff Assistants to the Ombudsman are James Malcolm, Chemical Engineer; Arnold B.
Medbury, P.E., Mechanical Engineer; Larry O. Tessier, P.E., Civil Engineer; and Thomas J.
Nakley, Civil Engineer.

TOLL-FREE HOTLINE SERVICE

The Ombudsman operates a toll-free hotline for the convenience of small businesses, trade
associations, and others seeking access to the Ombudsman.  A member of the Ombudsman's
staff will answer between  8:30 AM and 4:30 PM EST. Message-recording devices for calls
during non-business hours and overload periods are provided. All calls are personally handled
on a fast turn-around basis.

The toll-free hotline number is:

      800-368-5888
      202-260-0490 (in DC area)

-------
Callers request information on a variety of topics including:

      Clean Air Act regulations
      Underground storage tank notification
      Small quantity generator requirements
      Effluent standard guidelines
      Used oil
      Asbestos compliance
      Waste minimization/pollution prevention
      Pesticide registration fees.


Increases in the number of direct-dial calls and hotline calls (from 4,000 calls per year in the

early 1980s to the current level of 1,000 -1,500 calls per month) and the associated distribution

of technical and informational literature, growth in requests for personal appearances at
conferences and workshops, and an expansion in participation in policy-making activities are
evidence of the customer groups' confidence in the integrity and proactive stance of the SBO.


REGULATORY TRACKING AND ANALYSIS


The SBO performs a careful review of all proposed  regulatory actions published in the biannual

regulatory agenda to make a prima facia determination of small business impact. From the

agenda, certain proposed regulations are selected that appear to have the potential for adverse
impact on small businesses.  In 2000, the SBO reviewed and/or monitored over 100 regulatory

actions with some significant degree of intensity. In all instances, the SBO endeavored to

minimize the requirements (especially reporting and record keeping) on small businesses.

Equally significant is the level of voluntary compliance with EPA regulations  by the small
business community as a result of the rapport established between the Ombudsman and trade

associations during the developmental phase of the regulations.


MAJOR INITIATIVES IN  2000


The SBO's efforts to assist the small business community  continue at a high level.  Key
accomplishments and activities for 2000 (some of which are on-going) include:


•     Hosted seventh National Small Business Ombudsman and Technical Assistance
      Program Conference in Missoula, MT, which was attended by 44 states, 2 territories, and
      the District of Columbia (1910 participants).  Set plans and issued a grant to the state of
      Texas's Natural Resource Conservation Commission for an eighth conference in Austin,
      TX during Spring 2001.

       Implemented external  stakeholder guidance and acted as a principal participant in the
      Agency's Regulatory Tiering (prioritizing) Process.

•     Coordinated individual meetings and follow-up meetings among major small business
      trade associations and the EPA Deputy Administrat9r, Assistant Administrators, and
      Agency Small Business Program Office representatives to discuss small business
      initiatives and issues on January 27 and June 14, 2000.

-------
Finalized EPA's 1999 Small Business Ombudsman Report to Congress under Section
507 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

Cooperatively managing the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 Small Business Entity Outreach Sub-group to implement Act requirements.

Conducted Small Business Liaison Conference for EPA Regional Small Business
Representatives on August 2-3, 2000, which was attended by over a dozen state small
business program representatives.

Upgraded the EPA Small Business Ombudsman Internet home page at
www.epa.gov/sbo.

Participated in approximately 50 EPA regulatory work groups as formal reviewers to
represent small business concerns.

Cpnducted a state Compliance Advisory Panel Training and Networking Meeting in
Missoula, MT in June 2000.

Issued a revised and improved Environmental Management Assistance Guide for Small
Laboratories.

Upgraded a Source Book on Environmental Auditing for Small Business.

Developed a new booklet,  "Little Known But Allowable Ways to Deal With Hazardous
Waste."

In the process of implementing Cooperative Agreement projects with ten states to
improve their small business technical assistance and outreach programs and to
measure their assistance effectiveness. Conducted two days of specialized training  to
awardees on March 16-17, 2000.

Drafting an initiative to revise EPA's Small Business Strategy.

Developing a Small Business Environmental Management Systems Guide.

Completed a project to assess EPA's current suite of environmental services for small
businesses.  The resulting product, "Environmental Assistance Services for Small
Businesses:  Resource Guide," will be available in January 2001.

Initiated project with state Small Business Assistance Programs to enhance
effectiveness and publicity for their services and outreach activities.

-------
      APPENDIX C

FEDERAL SMALL BUSINESS
 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

-------
                                 APPENDIX C
      EPA'S FEDERAL SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM


The EPA provides technical guidance for the use of the states/territories in the implementation of

their programs. The Federal Small Business Technical Assistance Program (Federal SBAP) is
coordinated by the Information Transfer Group (ITG) of the Office of Air Quality Planning and

Standards (OAQPS). Other EPA programs participating in activities to assist the states include the
Office of Compliance, the Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office, and the

Pollution Prevention Division.


ELECTRONIC ACCESS


The Federal SBAP is actively involved in expanding the use of electronic media as a tool for access

to EPA information by small businesses, state SBAPs, and the general public.

•     The SBAP home page on the World Wide Web, part of the Technology Transfer Network
      (TTN), provides access to EPA small business assistance information and materials. Links
      to other small business-related sites also are provided. The SBAP home page address is
      www.epa.gov/ttn/sbap.

      The SBAP home page serves as a communication link for state SBAPs and includes a list
      of state and EPA small business program contacts. The home page also  provides a forum
      to share information and outreach materials developed specifically for small businesses.

      The Office of Air and Radiation,  Policy  and Guidance home page,  also part of the
      Technology Transfer Network, contains proposed and final rules;  background, guidance, and
      plain-English fact sheets; and implementation strategy updates and schedules.


PLAIN ENGLISH GUIDANCE MATERIALS


The Federal SBAP prepares materials for use by the states to explain new EPA CAA rules in plain
English.  These include detailed guidebooks  with options for  compliance, including pollution
prevention; sample reporting and recordkeeping forms; and example calculations. These are
distributed to state SBAPs as well as directly to small businesses; both hard copy and  electronic
formats are provided to allow for state-specific customization and reproduction as needed.

      Halogenated Solvent Cleaning (completed May 1995)
      Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing (completed May 1995)
      Wood Furniture (completed September 1997)
      Potential-To-Emit (1999).

-------
SATELLITE SEMINARS


The Federal SBAP is working with EPA's Small Business Ombudsman (SBO) and OAQPS's

Education and Outreach Group to present a series of satellite downlink seminars to educate small

businesses on new EPA air regulations. Past seminars include:


      Perc Drycleaners (May 1994) had 3,000 participants at 197 sites in 48 states, one Canadian
      site, and two in Mexico.

      Halogenated Solvent Cleaning/Degreasing (May 1995) had 1,300 participants at 101 sites
      in 45 states, one site in Canada, and two in Mexico.

•     Chromium Electroplating (November 1995) had 2,000 participants at 140 sites in 43 states.

•     Green and Profitable Printing (May 1996) was presented in cooperation with EPA's Office
      of Compliance through the Pnnter*s National Environmental Assistance Center.

•     Wood Furniture Manufacturing (September 1996) had approximately 1,900 participants at
      140 sites in 34 states.

      Consumer Products (October 1998) had approximately 600 participants at 100 sites in 40
      states. This project included a post-broadcast help-site on the Internet, and distribution of
      broadcast video tapes upon request.


OTHER PARTNERSHIP ACTIVITIES


The Federal SBAP is working with staff from EPA's Office of Policy, Office of Compliance, and

Pollution Prevention Division to determine a strategy to encourage all of the various small business

assistance providers (i.e., SBAPs, Small Business Development Centers, pollution prevention

programs, Manufacturing Extension Programs, etc.) to coordinate efforts within their state. This
would provide small businesses with easier access to comprehensive business and environmental

assistance.

-------
          APPENDIX D

SBTCP STATUS, BUDGETS, STAFFING,
         ORGANIZATION

-------
  CO

  i
  o
  i
  Q.
  Ul
  OO

jls
°8nS
U1=
B
E
CO
CO
        2
        O)
        O
        8


        I
        CO
        "to
        CO
        CO

        CO
        T3
        O



        "5

        E

        co

        CO
        ^3

        "5

        O
        TJ
5


I5
Q.
0
O
C
-5
CO
"co
CO
CO

V,
c
o
u.

s°

c
CO
       "o

       03
       T3
        C
        s
       "55

       <5
       T3
       C
       13
             Sc
             'flfi
             Ul
             UJ
               CO
                           c
                           E
                IlSl^lssst,
         <

         <
         m
                                 S
                                       CC
                                    uw
6
6
                                           O
                                           N
 o

i«
o|
N42

-------
Q®
UJ C
i
m
Q
         IH
         co
             O


            CO

            CO
                              §
                            im
                            ES
                            CO CJ
5I
fl
                                   CO
                                   If)
                                   <
                                 Q. CO 0> 05 00
                    OC.
                    O
                    LL.
                 go
                                                          .c
                                                          1
                                                          CO
                                                           (DO
                                                          •=s
                                                                          8
                                                                         «
                                                                     co   S

                                                                I  islli
                                                                     O
                                                                     CO
                                                                     
-------
UJ C
-J-J
m =


4
CQ
(0
tc
UJ
^
5




a.
<
a
CO









•>«»
OMBUDSMAh
01

5
fc
n-
,- 2a co
Tracy Babbidge, Ombudsmar
Small Business Assistance Pi
Department of Environmental
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
860-424-3382
860-424-4063 (F)
800-760-7036 (S)
tracy.babbidge@po.state.ct.u
1-
O
I-
o
01
z
O^-
^J
oe
























CO
3
CD"
•o
CD
go iTS
5o» --'»
.C O5OCN O
TOT-OT CD
^ ^" CM *-
.C O ^ LU / ^f
DOS
CD
u.
O
CD
C
1
o
•Q
C
CD
s: -
o> J5
i *
^S Ss 3 g
|g ES ^c^ £
S9 ^fr <5T a
§5 i-5i o§ »
j=o> CDOJ I— f w
§•6 36 EO S
-•= m £- w — in (0
to co moo ^co co
l_
e
b
0.
m
CO
a. w
O CD
.C uj
v>-£
m S
UJ *•
to "5
"3
UJQ
C
o
IS .of
o°o
ffl c
Q O
£ =
Q. g
— .y o
JS = o
"c 3 in
i_ CD E "?0
a HI ilf 1
<.<»•; to -a S J>
gill 88 s
Q £UJ « «5 CM CO
^ ^ **~ m C*"3 ^^^" •* O
m
-------
Q_

2
w
Of
111
                        is
            K!
         OO  ""iri-:
         •« W ^r o Sj •=
         g^r
^£ 0.= JS 3 00 00 03

io|
-------
              CO
COT-
IS co
3CN

•4-TO
09 CM
03 CD
•«-• ^"
w_
                     s
                     CO
                     -g
                ssll
       CD
       CO
si
ui c
-J--5
CO c
       1
       a

       m
                              .      o
                              O co co oo £
                         5^
CO

1.
CM "3
Si  -

CO
o
in

                                       o
                                       o
                                          co
      i en co
                                       CB
                                      ISs£«8§S
                                       CO
                                                             J5
                                                             15
                  s   -
                   mCNCNI «
                   ™OO 3
                                 IT)
                                                    O

-------
       m
       CO
       111
       I
       00
       O)
UJ
C
       S
           C- w
           z^
                                11
                                •^i
                                   m
                                « c   g;
                                ^ CO   00
                                II   §
                            COLUCOQ-COCMCNOOA
                                 a>ffl   ^
                                 "c   4
                                 • CD   GO
                                •2»   S
                            .
                            Q UJ CO Q- CD CM (N 00 "C
                            g
                            CO
                            05
                                                o
JO

v
|   £
            oj

111!  £f
                                                              "^
                                                 -3C/3CO
-------
         CO
         CO

         OL
         IU
                                                                                                    •gfe
                                                                                                     CO O
                                                                                                 35 T-
                                                                                                    -CO
                                                                                                 C 3 CO
                                               0)

                                               S
                                               CO



                                            UTT3
                                                                                            I

         Q.


         to
Q
UJ
-I
00
§

C
                                                              O

                                                              03
                                                              O
                         T-T-
               O «EQ — iir> tn

                  aj
          (0
          O
          3
          (Q

          O
                                                         co
Sus
Busi
Ml
                                               -
                                       O 2 LO CO CD (O
          to
               o
               X
                                           S
                                           CO
                                           UJ
Q_
o.

CO
CO

CO
CO-
o:

o
CO

-------
              .
      Q.
      CO
      CO
      K
      m
      o.

      CO
D
LU
—I
00
§
C
         CO
         Q
         Cfl
         o
                   * ««,
      S
                               8
                               c
                                  to
                                  <
                                  8
                                       a>
                                       CO
            s
            to
            d
            
-------
                 •s
                 £
                 5
            m
            (0

            te.
            ui

co
                 05

                 i     ?
                 CD     in

LU  C
_J S
ffl  c
                   O


                 CO 'P
OMBUDS
                 S|   s

                 1|   |_


                 o?   11

                                 CMO505
                 OZOOcNCLHSSfflO
I
V)
                 LLJ

                 CO
                 cc

                 LU
                 —3
                                        in
                                                    S5
                                                     cmmo 5;
                                                              ^
                                                              .roa>oo >
                                                                     ,- S  • CCNCNI^ f
                                                          05 Co— ^-t—
                                                         i£ LU co < in m
CC
O
                                                                                     03 E
                                                                                     •£• CD
                                                                                     c £:
                                                                                     05 O5

                                                                                     °nS
                                                                                     0) Q.

                                                                                     •| s ,.



                                                                                     ?li
                                                                                  QZ

                                                                                                          co 10 co
                                                                                                        ™co T- CN ^
                                                                                              ^ z co ^ a: en a> oo jS
                                                                                                 «i
                                                                                                 c S
                                                                                                 O O)
                                                                                                 o s
                                                                                                 050.


                                                                                                 "I8-!
                                                                                     l<8     LTz

                                                                                  H z co T- a: o> o> oo 2
                                                                                     fc- J-
                                                                                      S i_o

                            Ills
                            i_ J2 OJV
                            co coCJoi
                                                                                                > in co
                                                                                       ,     JT   i  c
                                                                                   co LU m 2 •§,« j- CNI co
                            r-4
                         730
                         Lil 2
                                                                                                          en en co
                                                                                                     -a
                                                                                                      co
O

I



O:
                                                                                                                (35

-------
            ffl
            CO

            K
            Ul
o


Q






•fe   CD
                 j. |

                 — -e
                 O co
                            §
     3ESneoocN4B
     o [G y T- CN co To
     co     •** *~
                                                                      s
                                                                      CO
            m
            co
|S
X c
                                               ®


                                               I
                          CD
                                             o
Ul C
_J V
m c
<< o
                        ®
                                           «       -
                                           o: o _i IL o to «o
                                               _i IL o to «o co •=
_o
'co
">
b
                                                                           co
                                                                           3
                                                                           ot
                                                                           ~
         *~^~* eo
         U.CO o
OMBUDS
                                             «§§
                                             CCC up
                          g
                                                           S
                                                          f
                                               !<§
                                               
-------
            CO
            ce
            ai
     o
    _o
    LL

    Is
                    f-io:
                         - 05 •* CO

                        -
                 O 1— t- 0. CM CM CO .Q
  I   §

  P   I
  c   -2
£       ai
  ._   «?.--.

  LU
                                                          /i WO S
                                                          O a. o>~
                                                             a
                                            — 5 aicoiiooo
                                            Qi5
                                                       CM N.CO O
                                                       CMN-in g.
                                                                                     J
                                                                                     O c
                                                                                     co E

                                                                                    31
                                                                   Q? ±±
                                                                   Q_ CO
                                                                    . 
                                        .sSS w'r'v-s
                                        "= yj , . caii ivL «,
                                        WQiO WoO 00 k.
                                                                          o
                                                                   •^ CO CM O 00 00 00 S
            a

            m

            I
                    <2
                    (0
                    (O
                   <
CO g"

S3
                            CM
                                                                                       s
                                                                                       "c
                                                                                       JO

                                                                                       "c
                            i
                          0>

                          "loe
                          ?£
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    CO
                                                                                                     CO
                                                                                                     ^
                                                                                         . = S O CO C33
                                                                            JO CO C33 S.
                 CD O QL Q: Q. I N. i^ S3
                                                                                     .
                                                                   ^ O co OQOO O
                                                                   D- W CM O CO CO CO O
                 CO
                                        o
                                        O
                       O

                       S
                       111
CO

UJ
o
O
x:
Di:
O
tr

o
I

-------
           I
           CO
           tt
           UJ
        D.




        CO
Q

LU
_l

QQ
§

C
               S
               CD
                              CO


                              CO
                              »
                              (0
        CO
        Q


        03



        O

                    as co
        CO
                                    .
                                    _i CO _i TI- Z to to eo .22
                                       08
                                          I      s
                                        5-2   i-  ^
                                        SiS   §  5
                                        c *:  rr is r*1

                                     CD
                                       "
                                                  l— CM o 
                                                              O
                                                                o
                                                               a

                                                                CO

                                                                §
                                                               _J

                                                               08

                                                               CO   ^
                                                               CO    O 5

c-£Oooo
                            CM
                                                                                  Qiu
       cD (0 O O O m
       ^cocococo S

-------
to
CO
{£.
Ml
Q.



CO
       £ =5 'co !r in « a
       E = 2 > •* N- in
       C 3    -Is- CMIO
       O CO £
    -or; 3 co "Si CM CM o T_
    ~   "^Isssl.
CO
Q

CD

i
1U
CO
                            CO

                          §°
                        i-22
                        CD CO C
                        £'55 ®
                        •=. .2 E
                        U
                                    >oo 01
                                    >coeo CD
                        II
                            CO

                          1°
                          22
                          *-•—
                            w~
Q^ ?
                                        CO


                                        CD
                                        >
                               CO  ^^--^ CO
                        Z

                        O
                        *:
                        >:
                                                3°°
                                                ico
                                                CO  -
                                                CO C
                                               ttl °
                                               — "S
                                                co •>
                                                 iO S
                                               08 ~
                                                       CN
                                             < O
                                             O^j
                                                        -CNCNCN.2
                                                        co co in in >
                                                cm

                                                IW-
                                               5 o
                                             s
                                             0
                                           D.

                                           m


                                           S
                                           m
                                           co
                                           _CB
                                           O
                                                                   TJ
                                                                   CO

                                                                   m

                                                                   "S
                                                                   CO

                                                                   £
                                                                   V
                                                                   CD
I    §
8    T
"J r-   S
•*- E   9
                                                                         O W
                                                                   CD
                                           CD
                                           Z


                                           CO
                                                                     CO

-------
             '!
             •<3 2
             OL8>>.
             m i-~ -
         GQ
         CO

         K
         Ul
    CB -{2 -s 35 Jo
    H.|^8

    lllfl


    5I2-S
    2mujS co

    !!?-«
    olisS
    03

    S
    CO

    til
   X CD

  JS "P

IT £-'55

•SSE,
cooo^

COCD'E
CM CN CD
O O>
         0)
         w
UJ C
—I ^
CD C

«rf O
PO
CO
Q

m


O
             z

             C5
             CC
             CO
             UJ
                        §
                        U-
                        so

                       ji7
                                     g
                     ill  g
                     OB O .E  N-
                                         003-
                                       000
                                             '
                     CO

                     o
                     o
                     CO
                                        CO

                                        a
                                        CD


                                        i
                                        •>
                                                  -

                                                  d)
                                                CO E   <" »>>««




                                                ^Q.S^co?*?1?
                                                c>^I S^r coi^-s-
                                                .EC.t^O-CC3O
                                                f- ><«•<- CO co co cT
                                                Olo
                                                w ~-
                                                *t
                          o >
                          03 -
                                                CO C
                                                •» 
                                                *-k ^^  . C,    ^~,

                                                            '
                                                 to  -   . c
                           o


                           o

-------
   (0

   g

   I
   UJ
   Q.
   O
   a.

   I
   (0
   01


   Ul
QUI
   IU
   S

   CO
   3
   ffl
   UJ
   LL
   o

   CO
   UJ
f
O
Ul
m
CO
O
H
1
Ul
a.
O
$
Ul
o
s



•I
Ul
E
X
•CO
i^T-
1
<,co
UJ
u.
o
Cc
f
00
I
o

0.
s






I
«o
'• •-• ''.

-':*• "
O
CO
CO;



"1





m
CO



o
m
CO


§1
tut
p~ ^^

^
h-






S3



CO
S3
in



S3





i



CO
O)
u?






I) Alabama
z






00
S3



OH



DC
Z





CO
S3



cc.






co
.co
O






S3



i



93





I



1
T-






Arizona
z






in
S3



z



<





in
93



2


?
3
Q

CO
II Maricop
CJ
CD






co
0)
T—



co
CO



in
S3
CD





co



CO
T™






|| Arkansas
o:
z






O)
0)
£
£
.a


in
93



t£.




g
2
£
CD
_a

CM
i
r*






I California
93






CM
i



S3



CM
S3





CM
S3



S3






|| Colorado
OL
Z






a:
z



a:



CO
93





1



co




"3

|| Connectic
oo
S3






in
93



m
O)
CM
T*"



1





in
1



in
§






Delaware
1
CM






I
T—



in
55



CN





co
CO
CM



CM
T—

co
la
"o
O

t
~o
1
Q
CO
T—






CM
S3



CM
S3



co
S3





CM



si






CO
b
U.
1






co
93



1



co
S3





CN



CM"






.2
b
0
O
UJ






oo
S3



oo
§



UJ
z





S3



1






1
co
I
in






1



CO
OJ
0



in





si



CO
93
o






o
CO
oo
S3
CO






I



CM
S3
in



oo
i





CM
S3



CM
S3
in






CO
'o
c
i






I



co
co



m
S3





i



CO
S3
CO






|| Indiana
z






CM
O



in
0



Z





1



m
1






co
co
1






1



i



co





CO



co
CO
h-






|| Kansas
m






S3
o


?f
li
csim
roS?
J5 CM

1
O
^




1


II
*--^
c^ *^
O3 CD
J5 CM





Kentucky
z






m
S3



S3
co


0.
o
~
0
Z


S3



in
i



o

C"
Jeffersol
                                                                                                                     00

-------
Ml C
-IV
ffl =
^ o

Z
o
111
CO
z
o
ut
0.
o
01
111
X
08
.' X
o
•s
"z
IU
"f
CO
CO
111
u.
0£
08
E
z
0


^
u





1
CO




o
m
CO
o



a.
£
CO


O
CO
CO
si
« STATE
TERRIT
co
cn
o





CM
cn
^~




CM
cn
co
CT>
o



CM
cn



CM
OT

1 Louisiana
$
•*





••a-
cn





co
5
CO
S>
o



CO
s



CO
cn
o

0
i

Z





1





cn
Z



cn



cn

T3
C
CO
c?
CO
cn
Z





CM
cn
"^*




OL
Z
Z



§



OL

\ Massachuset
cn
cn





S





m
cn
o
T—
35



cn



in
cn
o

c
cc
c
co
cn
cn





co
cn
:=?





CO
cn
co
CM



CM
cn



1

\ Minnesota
co
£





co





co
CO



CO
cn



CO
cn

|| Mississippi

•$





1





in
CM
cn
CO



CM



CM
cn
co

•c
H

CNJ





co
cn
-





CM





CM
'8



CM
T-



CM
cn
r-

I Nebraska
m
cn






m
cn





m
S



s



m
cn
T—

|| Nevada
co
co





CO
OS





I
in
cn



CO
cn



T~

x:
c
I
a
r-.
cn






CM
cn





co
2>
CM



CM
cn



co

i
I
in
cn
JI





co
cn





35
cn
o



CM



CM
cn
o

8
1
z

co





CM





co
cn
1



CM
cn



1

-g
I
S
^





CO





co
cn
cn



CO
§



i
co
1
8
.c
c
co
cn
co





CM
cn





CM
cn
CM
cn
in



§



!

"c
€
co
o>






m
cn





1
CM
1
t


o



cn
c\i

o
6

co





1
T-




O
co



i



co

|| Oklahoma
S
JI





i
^




1
i



OT
CO


OT
co

c
I
CM
•i
%1
M'.
 \l

-------
Ul C
—I '-SZ

m Z
rf O


2
O
Ul
m
• : eo
O
1
Ul
a.
O
m^
1
MONTHS
z
Ul
• s
•;\x
si
p
CO
Ul
u.
o
01

oS
X
o
s
'



1




1*1,s
I


rs
: ::O

• -v '
,;o-.
x ' -V '
*\ /K
.* '-
ML.
CO


,' -
o
at
co
sl
Ull-
-i


co
en





en


co
25
CM






CM
en
^1



CM
CO
Pennsylvan


CO
§





1


o
CO






1
T-



cn
o

o
o
OH
o
(L


i





in


*
en
55
LU
Z






CO
O)
T-



LO
25
73
c
co
tn
CD
•o
o
&


I





co
i


co
o>
£
1
co






co
O)
co



CO
o>
CO
co
Q
co
O
o
CO


1





CM
en


co
05
T-
1






CM
cn
T-



co
g>
S
o
CO
Q
o
CO


o





co
cn


CO
O)
55
LU






CO
•«-



CO
cn
T—

|| Tennessee


CM





CM


CM
CM
cn






CM
en
T—



CN
Oi

CO
CO


tn
CO





1


1
3






$
f"



1

CO
5


C3)
O





CO
o>
CN
T-


'
co
°5






CO
92
T^



LU

1 Vermont


92





co
92


co
92
in
92






co
cn
co



CM
cn
co

CO
'c
"?


O





co
9?


co
92
LU






CO
•<-



CO
92
T-
CO
co
tn
c
'£
co
en
mmer
j
CO




CO
cn
1
n
CO
CM
cn
75
LU
CO
O)
CD
3
CO


CO
cn
CD
g
3
CO

CM
en
I

|| Washington


cn
co





55


CM
T-
92






CO
92
^



5
CO
_c
~tn
1


co





CM
en
CM


CM
92
T—
CM
92






CM
en
•*



9?

|| Wisconsin


m
en
m





co
en
T—


55
CM






CM
CO



CM
§

1 Wyoming
                                                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                                                   I

                                                                                                                                   o

                                                                                                                                   g

                                                                                                                                  'tn
                                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                                   a.

                                                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                                                  m
                                                                                                                                  co
                                                                                                                             co
                                                                                                                             CD

-------
   (0
   UJ

   I

   o
   (0
   o

   o
   z
QO

UJH
_J<
CD 5
   tn
   O
   Q
   D
   CO
   a.
   m
   (0
   S2
"CD
=
P




CO
0)
.2
P


CO
CD
jg
p
O
O
O
co"

o
o
o
in"



o
0
o
N-"






S
o
CNj"




25
•II
.2 "o
QO










CO
o
•S
_CD


Title V fees
o
§
O5
CO




§
in_
?







o
o
o
in"




CD
o
LL

S
.2
CD
S
1-




co
0
•S
T=
i-


jg
H
O
O
o_
in"
S

o
o
o
in"



o
o"
m





o
§
8"




CO
"S1
o
CD
O




^
Z




Title V fees -
special fund


{}
O
o
o
S

z




i
o
m"
CO





§
C3
O




1


CD
O)
•o
3
£}
O)
1
CD
Q.
O
i
CO
CD
•2
_CD
P


Title V fees -
personnel
budget
o
o
LO





o
en







o
o
CM
8"




o
co
R
i
i

-------
UJ C
ml






0
z
a

U.
u.
O
tu
u
X.
o
(0







^«*
*^^
s
0
co
o
0
o
CN






^^
^
U






Q.
CO


o
ca
V)
•
1-
<
H
a
: 'a


1
CO

0
CO
(0
§1
w
Uj|_
II

CO
CD


_CD
F



CO
CD
_CD
F


JB
F
o
o
o
co"

CN


o
8
s
CO

8
o
co"




CO
'5



3
CO
CO
O)
5

iS
CD
Special fund,
permit fees,
general revenu


•a" -
C CO
fJ-8
CO*, CO 3
«§
o"
o




Kansas



-

j)
F



J
_®


_CD
H
8
CN
co"

oas/M-c
£

o
o
CO

o
o
CO_
co"
CO
T-



1
a






Z

E
rts
Section 105
grant/local gem
funds


50% Section
105/local
general funds,
50% Title V
0
o
in"
CN
V
z


O
O
O_
in"
CO

o
o
o
o"


2?
O
Jeffersor






z



CC

CD
Funded by oth
programs
8
o
o"
o
•^r
o


8
o
o"
o

o





Louisiana

CO
0)


_CD
F



CO
CD
S3
F


1
CD
1
O
o
g"

•o
CD
CD
<

8
O
in"
a>

0
o
o
12"




CD
'5






z



ts
S
m-g
Q c
55


||
8
in
S

z


8
o
S

o
s
co"




Maryland






z



Large quantity
toxic users/
state funded


(£.
OL



DC.
z


z


z



c
CO
Massachu






z



State & county
fees, restricted
funds


11
CD -CO
O
O

as"
CM
in
z


8
CO"
g

o
o
in
CN




CO
u
is
CM

-------
U C






0
Z
a
SOURCE OF FUN










^^
$J
UJ
O
Q
3-
CQ
O
o
(^
IX












D.
U



k
CD
CO


8
CO


, 1
<
1 s\
£
a.
o






0.
^f
m
CO





O
m
CO
STATE OR
TERRITORY




in
o
T—
CO
CD
!t §
< O)

AQ/HW/WQ fees
1 05 grant, WQ &
507 grant, AQ
environmental
enforcement


m
o
i-
< O5
8
o
5
CM

O
O
O





8
o
S
T""






O
O
in
£


linnesota
S



03
1
>
_gj
P

Title V fees


I
F
§
o
m"
o
CO

o
o
o
in"





8
o
8







o
o
0
o"
in
T-

lississippi
2

^ S
CQ 	 CD

O CD >£-
08 (D o"
> ® ^ »-
CD co" CD C
:B cc > co

Title V fees,
general revenue,
federal grant

i_
fl>
I
00
^) CO
o
o

CM
in

o
o
o
o"





o
o
co_
N."
in
^^






o
o
CO
CO"
in "


•c
o
CO
CO
^
§'


o
Q.
^0
D
— i
^C *S-

.*;
E
CD
Q.
to
.h ®


CO
>,CD
If
o-£
< 0.
o
o
o
s


o
o
o
CM"





o
o
o
CO"







§
0
CO"
OJ


bntana
5






z




i
.CD
O
O
O
m"
o


*












0
o
0_
in"
o



ebraska
z

.t±
CD J-
o-o
<- £
CO CD
Q. [J
Q CO C
to
o
u
O "O
£ i j2
lol
Z §..£

„
1
Io
z§
CM
in
8
CO

o
o
o
co"





en
CM
co"
m
CO






CO
of
CO


CO
1
CD
Z








Emission fees

CO
1
o
"55
X
1
LJJ
O
O
O
o"
O





O
O
O
m"









0
8
m"
CM


ew Hampshire
z

|

Q.
C?
•^=
S
CD CO

Operating permit
fees


CO
fl
2'E
II
O
o
in
co"
CO


o
o
in





8
o
m"
CO







o
o
o
s


e
CD
CD
Z
CD

O
CO CO*
O-o
£ c
>-2 j2
S§ 2
t— CO O)
o
Title V fees,
grants, other stat
funds
CO
c
-5
S®
.2.2
>2
^^
F'o
o
o

co
CM
CM

O
O
in
T-





§
0
m"
CM






O
O
O
o"


ew Mexico
z






on
z
.t
CO
o
O
05-0
z!

c
CO
CD
0
.2-0
J5§
>- t
z<
o
o
o
m"
co_

o





o
o
o
in"
CO






o
I
in

ew York
z











CO
CD
_O
O
O
CO
05"
CO









O
CO
m"

CO







orth Carolina
z



CO
CD
&
>
0>

CO
1


CO
CD
_CD
o
O
O
CO


O
O
O





§
O
o"
CO







o
o
o
s"


CO
"5
•c
o
z
                                                                                                                      CO
                                                                                                                       1

-------
LU C
_js<
GO c







O
. z
Q
zr
3
„ IL
u.
O
UI
o
•3
o
CO
v







^111^
^•^
UJ
o
. a
ffl
o
• o
o
CM










1







1
CO



6
s


I
; a.
',9-
- •> -


-,-flL
m
CO


-
0
m
m
>
STATE O
TERRITOF











1


Q
8"|
&%>.
>c2
® £.8
;±i CO 3
1- 0. CO
o
o
co"
CO


in
^TT
CO
S
CM





8
o
co"
CM
CM


g











^j
P

_
£

1*
^8
CM_
CO


CM
CO
CM"
in





CO
s
*



Oklahoma



CO
CD
®
—
P




CO
1
.2
P



S
J2
>
_CD
P
O
8.
?
o
S
CM"



o
1




o
§
co"
CO



1
£
O



1
CD
35
P




.92
H

o
^
CD"
> §"°
^ Q.O.

o
o
o
S
co
o
§
in



o
§
in




|
1



Pennsylvania





<£
"Z.




|
75
'3
CD
£





z
o
o
o
o"
$



o
1
CM




^




8
ir
o
a
a.





<
z




Title V fees





z
o
o
o
a>
T-
o



0
o
C3
t—




O




•o
_«
1
o:



I
^2

P




Title V fees



co
03
£
.2
P
S
o
co"
CM
O



O
o
s"




s
o
co"
CO


m
||
|| South Carolin;



CO
CD
-S
CD
*z»
i-




to
CD
CD
C
h-



CD
£
i=
o
o"
m"



o
S
o"




c
ir:
CM



|| South Dakota





^f
Z








09
J)
P
O
o
§
5







o
8
o
CM




|| Tennessee




to
•o
c
a

O)

co
to
CD
c
S
^
= s

o
o
TJ-
CM"
in
o
o
o
CM"



0
o
m
co"




o
o
O3
•r-
CO



CO
5





^
z

^
c
a
State general





z
o
o
in
^
o



S
in
5"




o




|| Vermont



§
1
(D
0.




I
a?


-a

S
CD
0
CM
S
CM
in"



0
8
CM




0
^



cc
|c



i
CD
3=
t-


-

Title V fees



CD
CD
*•*
P
O
O
o
8~
CO
*



o
in"
0
CM




§
q
g
^


CO
•c
"a.
c
3?



CO
CD
CD
S





Title V fees



eo
CD
£
>
a
H
§
o
in
cti
o
o
o
in"



o
o
o.
o"
o
CM




|
c



c
|
a
1
CO
.2
"CD
CD
a.
CD

^



	
Title V fees,
agency penal



CO
CD
CD C/3
III
*S OJO>
1— CD Q
O
O
O
8
o
o
o
in



o
0
o
o"




o
o
o
in



West Virginia

-------
            i
            Q
            u_
            O
            ui
            U
            81
I
o>
                  O
                  m
                  to
Q§

HI  C
-J+:

ffl
                  I
             o
             m
                  m
                  eo
                LUh-
                            (A
                            CD

                            £

                            >

                            03


0)
      CO
      
-------
              cc
              z
                    (E
                    z
                                                                           K.
                                                                           z
           K

           E
                                                               1
                                                                           1C
                                                                           z
     co

  e  s
  01  Z
  o  <
  Q  X
  3  O
  CD  m
                     1
i   §
O   D
                                                                           o:
                                                                           z
Si"!
  *-  w
  O.  u_
  O  o


  1  1

  <  ol
         §
         a.
         is
         g
8
                 a:
                 z
                                C
                                z
                    K

                    Z
  o
  O   U4
      Q
           I
                                              tl

                                              11
1


I
             s
             a>
                                 a:
                                 z
           m
                                       I!
                                                |
                                                    5




                                                    I

-------
01  C
-J V
OQ  C
             fee-
                                      s
                                                    in
                                                    2
                                                     i
                                                             in

                                                             ft
to
                                                                                                                         I.
                                                           CM
                                                                                                                                          £
                                                                                                                                          i
                                                                                                                                          »
                                                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                                                          s
                                                                                                                                          o.

-------
§
m
Q§

UJ  C
—I'C
(0  =
 O.
 4

 g
STATE OR
ERRITORY
els among the 1999, 2000, and 2001 budget periods:
_0
CD
C
T3
,3
C
#
O
T-
co
£
o
£,
CO
xplanations of significant change
CD
O)
c
'•5
"o
c
co"
£
0
"Z.
*
responses to inquiries have been performed on an ad hoc
Distance and
36 contact.
co F
10 c5
%X
CD CO
c M
'to™
3 CO
.a co
	 CD
COJ3
05 £
if
CO CO
II
"o >,
CO .a
.c ^
CD-o
.Q"CO
CO CD
£"o
o
a>ca
2 (S
o
CO
.52 'co
•C CO
I-J2


^
<
ssing permitting fees. The compliance assistance program
lysis for asse
(0
(0
CO
"O
0
CD
3. CO
O >
Pro
DEQ completed a workload and i
jquirements are based on this an
< ul
c5~co
81
CM ro
-£M=


N
<
T3
_0
i
.0
1
CO
ro
g
'co
o
Q.
T5
"«
o
CO
CD
o
0
o
CM
CO
111
LL
m
CM
2
CO
E
ess Assistance Program went fro
c
"55
CD
CD
.c
i=


Cd
<





o
0
o
CM
c
to
~c
£
05
CL
UJ


O
O
the program expanded to include multimedia. Activities
nee activities that are mostly directed at small businesses.
acked before
ance assistai
£=5.
«E
is
z°
^ 1
CO CO
co £-
CD (n
.E-S
ws
ger separate funding for small bu
•e agency-wide and represent a v
c co
— T3
11
> O


\-
O
o
o
CN
I
_c
c
ro
OJ
CD
J2
ro
CO
T3
^5
o
c
CD
cz
ro
elaware did not have an ombuds
Q
o"
o
_c


UJ
Q
g calendars; designing and procuring display kiosks; and
_c
ro
CD
o
&
•a
D)
_c
J2
•c
1o
'•&
T5
ro
O5
c .
•i w
Q.CD
& 2
"55 ^


If
55 •§


O
Q
snt of senior staff with employees of lower classifications.
E
8
ro
Q.
£
o
CD
•o
O)
O>
0)
T"
_c
T3
CD
O
•o
m
S
_c
c
LL
O>
0)
•r-
U-
JO
"c
£
O)
LJJ
p
T3
ro
X


1
D:





_c
CO
.g
'«
a
CD
I
O
5
T3
ro

1
OL
CD
CO


<(
CD


CO
0
L_
CD
Q.
X
0
"ro
s in approved budget versus acti
8

£
£
b



=i
technical assistance strategies.
CO
0
A
0
0
.c
s
"0
•D
2
0
CO
CO
0
CO
CO
onduct a small business needs a
o
'5
>
O
CO




<
co £i
.0
°*:5
§1
E!
2cn
"- C
21
ro t:
JSfe
ro Q.
"0^™
T3 CD
O5 O
IJO
CD 0
§2
CO CO
5g
S=5
5 c
0Q.
^
Q CD
CO
0 .
COr-
roo
CQLL
°f
Ml
O"°
"mlj
wfi.
T3 O
^a Q.
2*"0
rou.
*- E
QJ O
nv^
CD CO



2
                                                                                                                       CO
No respon
                                                                                                                        1
                                                                                                                        03

                                                                                                                        "S
                                                                                                                        z

-------
LU C
-J*:

00 S
<• o

So
                      TJ i-
      tsSlll

      §Plj£
      JrjO.^0
      S-cSoto

      ±•832
      S 2s~I<

      ^Siii*
      j=-o i-9=w
      S—$o>cL •
      2-2 §£ &8

      &|*£§e
      *- °.£ c© 3

      ȣfe~2s
      'SCD>2S-E"S
      ^El2i«
he (^E
fo

D
b
use of fees for fundin


ST"' ^ **""
ith
                              fi
                              ilO
                              §"-
                              •fc.c

                              11





udget of $82,000. The minimum


1he%topfia°tionUSS

i
z
_c
E
8s
L.
Q.
^
'5.
Q.
LU
2
C
•c
a.
Q>

*••
CD
CD
"5.
o
H
"c
5
O)
o
o
o
S
69-
«,
8 ?
°l
§m
C/3
Is
s<
°-co
CD"—
£ SS
«S
11
^ c
~T&
s: 0
few
J^ °>
~CO 3

8-^feI
•°"S^8

al«?

Sl5§

|-2=^
§EOW
t>25-o

lo°~
5 2 en - .
CD Q-to ^2 co
c eo= c.2







nf^^^^^
tl



                                                                   .

                                                                   S

                                                                   1
                                   O
      X
      O
                                                o:   co

-------
  o
  5

2!
UJU.
u.
u.
s
(0
    LOCO
    Q00
      (D
    s^
    CD|

    f— O
    •- w
    S o
    w c
    0-0
    D. 2
    CQ^O
    CO CD
    CD CD

    O1"
      I
    OQ Q.
    0) CD
    r o
    O.C
    a. eo
    (0 J
H^-  *i CD
 Q.
      o-'o
      CD i_


    11
    = C
    ISJ
    DCO O

    CD ^ CD
    f- -*-1 r-

    CD



    D JC
         1_^L ^^^
         8.S
      ±S C




. '.—
ui
£
*
•z
g
•;&
- o
u.
Q.
(D
CO



.
U.
\;Z

^"'
r*
O
VO
u.
O
CO
(0






-------
Q§
UJ C




^
fi
: U.
£
O
.-§
2
3
U.
Q.
CD
CO



• -^*
Ul
Ik
N^-
z
2
' H"
o
•2T
u.
O
ffl
CO





^
£OUL
cou.
o
H


o
I

3



Q
"3
a.
0
O*°


Qfu.
utu.
GOT



O
m
CO
O
t

Q^
Ul
1-
0£
O
Ul
I
o
o
in





o






o
o
in



o
q

o




8
T—









I
O
in
in





o






o
in
m'



o
in

g
d



o
q
T-









II
|| Kansas
o
o
co





o






o
o
CO



o
CO

8
d



o
q
T-









Kentucky
o
o
CM





o






8
CM



O
q

0




o
q
T-



^,
"c
C
O
c

1
_a
8
co
T~




0






8
co
^~


in
CM
d

0




in
CM
d









|| Louisiana
0
o
CM"





o






CM



O
q
T—

O




o
q
T—









CD
"5
§
d





o






o
OS
d



o
CM
d

o




8
d









•o
c
cc
DC






OC







-------
UJ C
-J3=
CD C
<< O



>—•
(A
UI
U.
*

z
O
^^
..&
"Z.
;^5
u.
0}

-


'-
^^
m
ui
u.
z
o
&
z
u.
o
oa
(0










M
U.
<
tot
O
. 1-




"'•: "9
',"» a.

, • 3



L«, o
2
V;- Q.
£&
;:-O
^m


au.
HI It
&w
, "-j

^

o
m
(O
o
5
UI
H

o
111
1
in
CM
CM





0






in
CM
CM



in
N.



«
d




o
p
T—






CO

1
co
O
£
0
8
CM





O






1-5
_^ C
O §
in z
do
in
T—
O
in
d



0





g
d







CO
0
^
co
a
0
8
"*





0






o
o
•
-------
















UJ C
a!
PO






















*«
UJ
, u.
,*
r.c
1
•3
>• U.
0.
OQ
CO




ID"
IU
t
2
g
o
Z
U.
OQ
CO





O.
DO a.
cou.


     CO
     (D
     •
     _

     U
          73

          £

          !»
          q
          oi
•o

73
CO
CD
     <   ^

-------
UIQ.



0
   Q.
   <
   O





0
O
Ul
Q.
O
IU
Q.
0
K
UI
CO


z





DC
tu
3C
O
NOT YET
PPOINTED
^

_i •
^O
^^^J
U1(Q
%2
0




>.
STATE
GULATOF
MPLOYEE
tmu
CO
duiuj
m
0
H
u.
u.
IU
»"*
QJ
o
111
(/>










CM






-


*










|| Alabama




















i










CO
to
_co










CM






-


*










(I Arizona




















a:
•z.


^
c
O
O
co
a
o
o
CO


















-


^










|| Arkansas




















a:
•z.










|| California

f
T-

-





T-






co
o


*










|| Colorado










CM






CM


*









"3
Connectic




















a:
•z.










|| Delaware




co





















CO
IQ
£

3
•£
5

















-


CO










CD
O
LL










CM






T—


*










CO
"S>
§
o




-


























1




CO





CM









CM










O
co
2




-





•^-






-


T—










CO
'o




CM












t—


*










CD
CO
_c




h-


























co
1




CM





CM






-


CM










|| Kansas

*
CM

co





CM






T—


CO










Kentucky
                                                                                                                     z

                                                                                                                     <

-------
LU C
_J '•&
tO c





O
: .Z
o
,u
Q.
2
Q.
U.
O
Ul
CO












01

o
a
II
; :;*
-,


— !"•
SB
$



;||i
^-1-1
dSS
|wl
m
0
H-
(£
£
Of
o
111

















cc
z


>,
c
3
§


CM








CM














1 Louisiana

CO








CM




f\l









O
"5

















o:
z






c
K

















a:
z





w
| Massachuse!










CM














c
ct
Ic
I

























1
!| Minnesota

CM








CM














|
| Mississippi










CM














J
| Missouri

























| Montana

*








CM














I
|| Nebraska










CM














I Nevada










CM













£
v.
K
Z










CM














a?
tf.
jr
Z

ID























8
1
z










CM














*
1
1
























cc
1 North Carolin










CM














&
'c
a
r
z




CM





CM














.g
Ic
CM

-------
UJ  C
-1:5
ffl  c





"'
'' OL
<
O
o
Ul
,''^J'.
, Q.
0
Ul
OL
0.
0
4-QJ
Ul
OQ
'• SSB





0£
Ul
X
0
:' O
KUI
ttjH
• • ?•«;.
to
, Oo.
zo-
<

* . . , ,
<0
" OK J
Sm
ZD
in 5.
o

- ',' .
-" v •
STATE
GULATOR'
MPLOYEE
uttu
-'- K
' W
_two:
_JlUlU
S555
OT^irt
- •* ^ ^
03
£
o
S
ir
Ul
K
0
STATE


*
x—



^"





CM







CO






Oklahoma












co





CM

CO






1
£
O


CM









T_





CN

CO






|| Pennsylvania







0.




















i






•a
co
_w
CD
|
S












CM





-

•
S
£












CM





T"

T}-






sz
co
5


CM

















in






||
|| Vermont












CM





T—

Tt






CO
"c
'S1
>






N.





















•a
CO
CO
c
'!?
>






co





^-





-

CM






|| Washington






^j-











T—

CM






|| West Virginia


*









CO





oo
o

•*






|| Wisconsin


CM









CM





-

•*






[1 Wyoming
CO
                                                                                                                                   I
                                                                                                                                   I
                                                                                                                                   ca
                                                                                                                                   .9
                                                                                                                                   •3.
                                                                                                                     CO
                                                                                                                     V
                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                         O

-------
TABLE D-
(Continue

Currently awaiting replacements.
in County APCD.
£
1 Economic Development, 1 Jeffe


Q
UJ
Q
a"
UJ
a
ipal government, 2 environmental.
_o
C
1
CM
I
JS
CM
!D
CO
0}
'en
.a
S
0)
CU
O)
CM


The CAP is being reappointed.

«j
Pending replacement appointmeni


O
CO
CO
en
"o
>
i
o


0>
i
Q.
X
LJJ


•ci
£
'5.
X
o
ID
£
<


Awaiting appointments.


Appointment by Executive Director
of Community and Economic Developmei
'c
1 state representative, 1 Departme


1 state representative, 1 VT SBDC,
£
CO
O
^
Replacements for previously filled |
1
5
Department of Commerce represer


Major source representatives.
                                                                                                                                          UJ
                                                                                                                                          z
CO
                 LU
                            CO   UJ
                                                   X   iC
                                                   o   o

-------
  (0

  z
  UJ

  o
  Q.

  O
  u
  Q.
  U

  &
QO
UJ2

»i
?5
  8
  UJ
  p
          o
          o
          O)
        CO CO
        I— >^
        3-§c5
        co -S -*±
f— *** r~

0-2 o
E. •— C
O COS

§?•§
~O 03 2»
^-.CLg)
.- C
l2^
ro-a o
>»CD C
OCD-S
"5-0.2
D«c?

?§;
co 2-^
co co co
        2-^.*


  S~    t; CD •—
        Q Jjl> QJ

  Q    St O3 S

        o
           CO O
        5-2l
        CQ'5 >>
CO u CD
        CQ 8-C
        co ^ g>

        °-l
        LL 0)£

















-^9
0
fr-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LOCA
























0.
O






y



Q.
(0
' :.•






2
CO


g
ii
10 S~
^










Q.
3
2
OJ
CD
T3
CD
Q.
CD
•o



Department of Environmental
Management, Air Division (R)

08
.0
— "co
JO 0
C -„
CD .
c «^J
.2 CD

iSo
Department ol
Management,
Outreach (N)
CO
£
CO
.Q
_co
<
















o:
z

^^
Qi
Department of Environmental
Conservation, Air Permit Program i










z

co
CO
_eg
**

^J*
15
3

^^
"£<
CD "
Es±
"c5§
coO
Q"S
•° §
ran o
co .2 —

llil
w
-c
~ o5
Department of Environmental Qual
Quality Division, Northern & Southi
Regional Offices (R)

co
a

£
c
CD

l£
'> c
C.O
Department ol
Air Quality Div

CO
N

<
















z


f-
Environmental Services Departmei
Community Services Division (R)










z
co
Q.
8
•c
CO
^
c
o
!eo

Si5
c ,„
® 0
c S
o ®
1^
LLJ c
oS
*- CO
§O
•1 ^
CO "~
Q.CO
® 3
QO

-
•i
Department of Environmental Qual
Customer Service Division (N)

CO
O

S
c
CD
E
!_
*^ ^?
LLJ CD
Department ol
| Director's Offii
to
CO
CO
c
CO
•2£
<




c
co
E
"co
g
CD
£
•g
CD
O
K
CQ
Qi

*j"o
"Jn'S^*
Throughout CA, including division s
Office of the Ombudsman, & in eac
35 Air Pollution Control or Air Qual
Management Districts (R&N)

1
^J
^^
CD

<
^—
OT sii*
o
CQ
Air Resources
the Ombudsm
CO
o
!fc
CO
O
















o:
z



Department of Public Health &
Environment, Air Pollution Control
Division, Regulatory & Compliance
Support Unit (R)

CD
— c
00 C

±±^o
CO 3
_CDO
o*5
•~ 03
•& o

Department ol
Environment,
Service (R)
o
T3
2
0
o
O




£
"c
CD
c
s
>
111
2
"c
"C "o
CO CD

DO:
c
.0
"S
Department of Environmental Prot«
(R)



s
c
CD

|
^
C
LLJ
Department ol
Protection (R)
o
"u
CD
«


















Z

"o
08 ??
Department of Natural Resources <
Environmental Conservation, Offic
the Secretary (N))
"o
11
w
oc
CO O
CD'-S
cc 5
|S
.3 c
CO O^~
zoz
Department ol
Environmenta
the Secretary
CD
i
CO
CD
0
                                                                                      cc
                                                                                      I

-------
o

UJ
—I
CQ
s;
C
o









\

'/\

0
1
o
•J
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
'" -l '.
...


•' -*









Sc
o









1
at
I;1*1"






O
GO
CO
§1
lUh-
£|
tfl lu
OTH












z



g
1
CD
O)
co
.2
to
w








g
>.
o
CD
O)
co
B
s
CO

"rt CO
°s
£E
j— 3
.2 !
QO

CO
CD
'o
m
0)
co
15
"o
CD
;O
'co
•4-rf
o
•o
JD
_l
C
.2 c
"o ®
m£
75 
Q. <0
IS co
Department of Environment!
Division of Air Resources M
(N)

en
CD
£-3
c
_l
CO CD
c££
CD i-
I5
£_. •*_
go
Department of Envi
Protection, Division
Management (N)


CO
T5
•^
b
CE
f S
1 i
O.blo co
Q-< CD CD
CD CO..,'"
££® §5
•^ «^- j^ y^
CO c*"" °>
— — (\j
»- u. _: 	
Q] ft\ J*m ZT
|Sg«
ISE-S
§ fSDQ'co
0-cS§
< £-^
0£ o.2
<"c?-§9:
af^d
^1
^*» f-L,
.2 co
.^ojs
>
Environmental Protection Di
Protection Branch, Planning
Program (N)
.-S
"5 O
**. Q.
-Q.
C 3
°co
•2 08
&g
C *r~*
§i
'•0«
coQ.
Environmental Prot
Protection Branch,
Program (N)


co
e

o





^^
CD
CO
3
CO
"55
CD

I
.»_*
0
0
CO co en
•*-* -*-< £
§£*
£££
c c<
O O r-
Department of Health, Envir
Health Administration, Envir
Management Division, Cleai
(R)

CO
^y
C CD
® o
II
It
c o
UJU
xTc=-
*^ r>^
Department of Heal
Health Administrate
Assistance Office (1


£P
>
CO









CD
•o
c
CD
Q.
CD
•D
^
15 i_
•3 CD
OE
— . o
TSii
Department of Environment!
Information Resources, Cus
Service Section (N)

_s£
3=
5 is
2 CD
OE
— o
11
CDQ
i^
O CD
C 0
Department of Envi
Information Resoun
Service Section (N)


o
e~
CO
2


08
CD
2
CD
£
§2
On
•5^
it
£ =5
«l
Q.E
Sc3
_^>
"c
3*—
|5
£ co
0®
. r™
Department of Commerce &
Affairs, Office of Small Busir



>^
o
(D
O)
<
^
J
"o
g8
l^E
_ 5 m
IA Air Emissions Assistance
(IAEAP), IA Waste Reductic
(IWRC), University of North*
"c
CD
£
Q.
0
>
CD
Q

O
1
Department of Ecoi
(N)



CO










£>
CO
1
1



KS State University (N)

?••
CD?
£S.
is
'£,%
uj >
*l
^S
TO03
CD OJ
X.E
*- c
0 C
*-* CO
§0:
1°
cog
§£
QO


*w
co
CO

c
CO
i«:


o
E
CD
SQ-
rnUJ
cpg
Q>
-=?r
**^
>,-,-,
£^
Ss
*- to
•§1
Q-E
oi-o
< co
CD
o>
CD
"o
o^^
c?
O-— '
University of Kentucky, Gatt
of Business and Economics
>_

o
"<»
»
^
o

CD
^
                                                                                                                             CM
                                                                                                                               £
                                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                                               z
                                                                                                                               JD

                                                                                                                               .O


-------
UI








' jr
g
BRIEP DESCRIPTION OF LOCAT



,. •


o








: Q.
o?




O
CD
(O
^
si

5|
wflf


-





Z


Air Pollution Control District (R)



--?
Air Pollution Control District (1

c
o
It
•I
O



1
w
•o
s
0
Q.
0
T5
oT
>
Department of Environmental Qualit

~
"co
O
Department of Environmental
1 (R)



CO
CO
CO
o
Jj

•a
• o
"o
•o
to
CO
"c
CD
ca
§e5
Din
o c
•o o
11
Oco
c
O
e i
Department of Environmental Protei
(R)




Department of Environmental
Protection (R)



0
c
'co
5







Z

L_
Department of the Environment,
Environmental Permits Service Cen
(R)
0
*-»
c
0
.0
"c 0
Department of the Environme
Environmental Permits Servic
(R)



T3
JO
CO
5







a:
z


Office of Technical Assistance (N)




a:
JO
"5
CO
3
o
CO
to
CO
co
5







z

>s
Department of Environmental Qualit
Environmental Assistance Division,
Education & Outreach Section (N)
CO
"j;
CO
CO
•n
Ml Economic Development
Corporation, Business Ombui
Office (N)



CO
.£?
o
2



tn
vu
^^
c
0
Q.
CD

jo
Pollution Control Agency, Metro Dis
(N)


<£

1
o
li
ii
I£E


CO
1
c=
11
CO
Environmental Qu
•5
"c
.
Department of Environmental Qualit

a
"co
a
Department of Environmental
(R)


'<->
Q.
'to
CO
'co
CO
^

Natural Resources
'ironmental Quality
stance Program
"~ CO
"cii!*1^
^ ^"co
ceo
C o'c
ra'eo-C
0> CD
QDH


Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Quality,
Technical Assistance Program (R)




Governor's Office (N)



o
CO
to
1
ca
ft\
Environmental
on Prevention Burt
**•• \ns
03
CO
0Q.
c
"C- -^
03 =
O. CO

>;
Department of Environmental Qualit
Pollution Prevention Bureau (N)

*i
"ro
Oz
Department of Environmental
Pollution Prevention Bureau (



co
2
o
5
CD
Environmental
nmental Assistanc
M- O
O I—
c!
0uj
c
"t ^*
D."CO

,;
Department of Environmental Qualit
Environmental Assistance (N)

•;
"co
6
Department of Environmental
Environmental Assistance (N



co
CO
CO
.a
0
Z

serve as staff with
duality, Planning
the lead
^t t- O!
^C ^t *~~
?o*o ®
VJ •+-*
oQ 2 ^r
CD = 5
CO CO CO

.
Division of Environmental Protectior
Bureau of Air Quality (R)

t£^
.2 oi
1?
Division of Environmental Prc
Office of Regulatory Assistan



co
•o
co
0
Z

Division
§



0
(£.


Air Resources Division (R)



^
Office of the Commissioner (f
2
(O

CO
X
1
Z

-------
UJ  C
—I "
JfcOS
°o
UJH-
f-5

ai
•^
o
Department <
Protection
c
Department of Environmental Protectio
1 (R)

£
5
o
Commerce & Economi
Commission (N)


>*
CO
CD
§
0


0
£
0
TO
"?rt
j/J
"3
o
"8
5
co
o
0
Independent
agency

Environment Department, Air Quality
1 Bureau, Control Strategy Section (R)


££
tt\
Environment Departme


8
X
£
aim
"5 r--
Department <
Conservatior
Support
CO
New York State Environmental Facilitie
Corporation, Technical Advisory
Services Division (state public benefit
corporation) (N)
CD
O
£>
•2-g
wo
tn~
New York State Empin
Development (econom
department) (N)



•^
o
>-
5
0
Z










Independent
z"
Department of Environment & Natural
Resources, Customer Service Center (
sfe
3 ^
£3
w fn
2.y
|i
Eco
Department of Environ
Resources, Customer
(N)
CO

1
CO
o
j=
o
Z

^
"co
0
.•D
j2

o
T3
0
"S
o
o
Independent
agencies

Department of Health, Environmental
Health Section (air, water, waste) (R)
£
it
ii
£o
Department of Health,
Health Section Chief's

CO
n
CO
Q
sz
o
Z










Independent

Environmental Protection Agency,
Division of Air Pollution Control (R)
g
^>
£
<
"c.
Air Quality Developme





o
lc
O



i_



CO
O
"o>c
3 0
S.»
Organized th
Services Div

Customer Services Division (N)


2^
¥
s
Executive Director's O'


CD

Q
CO
^
O

Q.
<
CO
CO
o
*"
C CO
O 0
CO CO
1J
§J
•r £1
If
•s»
J2O
3£D
Oco
k-
'3
Department of Environmental Quality, /
Quality Division (R)
^
to
a
Is
0
Department of Environ
Director's Office (R)




c
o
0°
c
O










Independent

Contracted* (N)


1
Department of Environ
1 Protection (N)
«
co
"c
co
>
>,
M
C
0
CL









.g
2
(D
&
a
c
'o
>,
Environmental Quality Board, Air Quali
1 Area (R)


-i—"
S
Commercial Developrn
1 Administration (N)


8
{£
^L>
i
0
3
0.










<

Department of Environmental
Management, Bureau of Environmenta
Protection, (R)




#
•o
CO
CO
* ~
0
TJ
o
sz
a:
                                                                                                                       I
                                                                                                                       I

-------
LU  C
-IS

CQ  S
rf  O










",>• -^fc.
O
1
3
u_
O
O
t
E
o
CO
m
Q
u.
tu
E
m










DL
<
O





•1
CO





O
m
CO
§1
uf —
SQ£
!•" ^^
co Iff
*^


— —
i=
-J
£ 2.-""
"en "c"co
CD O 3
TOO
partment of
vironmental
vironmental
ministration
,
Department of Environment &
Conservation, Division of Communil
Assistance (N)

"c
I
1
oa-§
Department of Environment
Conservation, Bureau of En'
(R)
CD
CD
CO
CO
CD
c
c
CD
K
c
O
•j= co
co w
|i£
oCO'"'
O=E
CDg2
o E a)
tural Resour
mmission, S
sistance Pro
co o co
Z0<



Natural Resource Conservation
Commission, Small Business
Assistance Program (N)



c
= CO
Natural Resource Conserva
Commission, Small Busines
Assistance Program (N)



CO
CD
X
CD

-v2

ll^
EOl
o^0-
•5*-08
c ° en
M- O'E
o'jo c
*--^ co
c.S;r
CDQ"-
• DOO
to
•—
>;i
Department of Environmental Qualil
Division of Air Quality, Operating Pe
Section (R)

^Q^
l¥
Ojg
"m *f
Department of Environments
Office of Planning & Public /




CO

5


.2 ]S
ffi §5
P 0
•— >- r-
^ -~ w
cg.2
partment of
nservation, i
sistance Divi
CD O CO
D0<
CD
O
CO
Department of Environmental
Conservation, Environmental Assist
Division (N)





z


c
o
E
CD
>







ependent
T3


>>
Department of Environmental Qualil
Division of Pollution Prevention &
Compliance Assistance (R)

^
"co
o
~m(£.
Department of Environment!
Air Programs Coordination (


.5

'5)
^
>







E
CO
1
+^
0



Department of Planning & Natural
1 Resources (R)





Not named - dual role SBAP
discontinued (R)
CO
•a
co
_CO

'O3

>




1
O^~
O
LJJ
partment of
CD
Q



Department of Ecology (R)





Department of Ecology (R)

2
O)
{*
^H
CO
•2
5







ependent
T3


r—
Division of Environmental Protectioi
Office of Air Quality (R)

c
.0
"o
CD
P
Division of Environmental Pi
(R)
co
"c
'E?

•*^
to
fn
•S
5







lependent
T3
_c

"co
«_ 0
Department of Commerce, Division
Marketing, Advocacy and Technoloi
Development (N)

o
'tO S-*
'C ^
•S fe
Department of Commerce, C
Marketing, Advocacy and
Technoloqical Development

c
to
c
o

;^
*
                                                                                                                          s
                                                                                                                          1
                                                                                                                          cc

-------
f E
Ad
Ser
                o
                CO
                o
                0
                JO

                •o
                0
                2
                Q.

                co
S

O
o
CD
CO


O


.g

"5
nfo
          OS
          UJ
-5°
Cti5 CO
                         Oi


                        £
                         P
O
O
IU =. w

8-&S
               to.
           I  «1
           7  * 2
           r  coo.
                               S
                     0
                     u

                    JO

                    Is
                    'co
                     CO
                     co

                    "co
                en  •«
                =  CO

                2  =5
                ^:  0
                *-  C
                T—  .—
                                    13
                             CN ,

     0C   g

     #8  |

     ^°   S
     OE   c
     Sfe   §
          O
               f 8
                                       oo
                                       o>
                                       co

                                       °P
                                                CO
                                                CD
                                 o

                              CO*!.
                              -- o

                                 s
                                             o E

                                             0 CO
                                             CMI-
                                S
                                O3

                                2
                                a.

                                0
                                o

                                CO

                                2
                                'co
                                CO
                                <

                                JS
                                c
                                   .
                                PCM
                                •5 CM
                                               0
                                                 m'^ XCO
                              o


                              0
                                                 ca

                                                 £
                                                o
                                                CO
                                                M=
                                                 I

                                              |3
                                               <<0
                                                                    c
                                                                    co
                                           0


                                           0
                                           05
                                           CO  .

                                           co o

                                           sis

                                           fl-S
                                           w'eo
                                           5 co
                                           5 co

                                           CO C
                                           3 O
                                                                   II
                                               'I
                                              0 "c
                                              rao
                                              OE
                                              §c5
                                              CMH
                                                                   .
                                                                   co co
                                                    Q. E

0

a.

0°c

IIs

                                                                     ^
                                                                         X
                                                                         -
                                                                D CD tt. r-- h-
                                              ca
                                              •o
                                              co

                                              0

-------
               2
            O CO
            O CD
            o >.
             . i
            in*-
            **o
                   o
               "
               E    w
            "t^
            §>§
            •
            o
            o
               
                          co co co
                          "55 "55.9

                          _ro
                          _co

                          CD
                          •o
                          O

                          IE

-------
         APPENDIX E
SBTCP ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES

-------
TABLE E-1
SBTCP ASSISTANCE
TOTAL BUSINESSES REACHED PER INDUSTRY SECTOR



INDUSTRY (SIC)

Other
Cross Sector
Auto/Body Maintenance, Repair, Refinishing (75)
Government (91 , 95)
Dry Cleaners/Laundry Services (721)
Metal Fabricating/Finishing (34)
Printing/Graphic Arts (27)
Organizations/Associations (86)
Gasoline Distribution (wholesale/retail) (517, 554)
Agriculture/Farming/Crop Service (01, 07)
Private Citizen
Attomey/Consultant/Engineer (81, 87)
Auto/Motor Vehicle Dealers & Equipment (55, 501)
Electroplating/Chrome Plating (347)
Schools (82)
Construction/Contractor (15, 16, 17)
Manufacturing, Misc.
Machine/Equipment Manufacturing & Repair (35)
Furniture Manufacture/Repair/Wood Finishing (25, 764
Concrete/Aggregate (32)
Recycling (509)
Utilities (49)
Boilers (34, 50)
Asphalt (295)
Paints & Painting/Coatings (172, 285)
Stone/Clay/Glass (32)
Petroleum Products, Storage, Pipelines (29, 46)
Hospitals/Medical Health Services (80)
Business Services (73)
Wastewater Treatment (495)
Sawmills/Loggjnaywood Products (24)
Real Estate (65)
Boat Manufacturing (373)
Asbestos/Remediation (17, 32)
Food/Beverage Products & Processing (20, 514)
Plastic Manufacturing/Products (308)
Retail/Wholesale Trade (50, 51, 59)
Chemicals/Products (28)
Recreation Services (79)
Electronics/Electric Equipment/Repair (36. 762)
Crushed Stone Products/Sand & Gravel (14)
Transportation Services (42, 44, 47)
Personal Services (72)
Engines & Turbines (351)
Degreasers
Waste/Waste Hauling (495)
Repair. Misc. (76)
Incinerators
Foundry/Smelter, Forging. Casting (33)
Transportation Equipment (37)
Bakeries (546)
Research & Testing Facilities/Laboratories (873)
Mining (metal & coal) (10, 12)
Aerospace (37)
Machine Shop (359)
Plumbing/HVAC(171)
Communications (48)
Dairy/Feedlots/Livestock (02)
Landfills/Landfill Gas (495)
Hotels/Motels (70)
Airports/Air Transportation (45)
Paper Manufacturing/Products (26)
Rubber Manufacturing/Products (30)


TOTAL STATES
PROVIDING ASST.

41
26
41
39


TOTAL BUSINESSES
REACHED

1614775
287086
63000
44661
41 | 27005
34
34
32
31
31
16356
9560
7482
6335
5918
29 1 3176
36 1 3052
26! 2530
31
27
1942
1775
33! 1486
32 1391
25 1390
37l - 1192
30
31
22
25
988
884
859
754
24! 733
33
15
26
27
21
25
28
22
23
704
701
681
660
566
559
489
477
462
24! 459
27
30
19
29
14
431
423
419
415
410
24 382
26! 381
26 | 371
131 312
161 299
15 293
23
14
266
254
15 222
23 211
17 1 208
20] 140
21
16
136
135
13! 126
19
114
141 113
13| 109
20 95
19! 94
101 91
15
18
11
Textiles & Apparel (22, 23) 17
Pharmaceuticals (283)
Grains/Grain Elevators (011, 422)
11
19
Cotton Gins (072) 10
81
77
66
67
66
64
56
Restaurants (581) I 13! 47
Analytical/Medical Instruments (38) I 15 39
Leather/Fur (31, 237) 7l 39
Veterinarians ]074)
Transit (passenger) (41 )

9L 25
8 8


-------
TABLE E-2
SBTCP ASSISTANCE
TOTAL STATES PROVIDING ASSISTANCE PER INDUSTRY SECTOR



INDUSTRY (SIC)

Auto/Body Maintenance, Repair, Refinishing (75)
Dry Cleaners/Laundry Services (721)
Other
Government (91. 95)
Furniture Manufacture/Repair/Wood Finishing (25, 764)
Attomey/Consultarrt/Engineer (81, 87)
Metal Fabricating/Finishing (34)
Printing/Graphic Arts (27)
Construction/Contractor (15, 16, 17)
Paints & Painting/Coatings (172, 285)
Manufacturing, Misc.
Organizations/Associations (86)
Agriculture/Farming/Crop Service (01, 07)
Electroplating/Chrome Plating (347)
Gasoline Distribution (wholesale/retail) (517, 554)
Recycling (509)
Concrete/Aggregate (32)
Plastic Manufacturing/Products (308)
Chemicals/Products (28)
Private Citizen
Sawmills/Logging/Wood Products (24)
FoooVBeverage Products & Processing (20, 514)
Hospitals/Medical Health Services (80)
Schools (82)
Auto/Motor Vehicle Dealers & Equipment (55, 501)
Crushed Stone Products/Sand & Gravel (14)
Petroleum Products, Storage, Pipelines (29, 46)
Transportation Services (42, 44, 47)
Cross Sector
Boilers (34, 50)
Machine/Equipment Manufacturing & Repair (35)
Wastewater Treatment (495)
Asbestos/Remediation (17, 32)
Asphalt (295)
Electronics/Electric Equipment/Repair (36, 762)
Boat Manufacturing (373)
Foundry/Smelter, Forging, Casting (33)
Waste/Waste Hauling (495)
Real Estate (65)
Utilities (49)
Business Services (73)
Research & Testing Facilities/Laboratories (873)
Bakeries (546)
Dairy/Feedlots/Livestock (02)
Grains/Grain Elevators (011, 422)
Landfills/Landfill Gas (495)
Machine Shop (359)
Retail/Wholesale Trade (50, 51, 59)
Paper Manufacturing/Products (26)
Textiles & Apparel (22, 23)
Transportation Equipment (37)
Engines & Turbines (351)
Mining (metal & coal) (10, 12)
Airports/Air Transportation (45)
Analytical/Medical Instruments (38)
Degreasers
Incinerators
Stone/Clay/Glass (32)
Plumbing/HVAC (171)
Recreation Services (79)
Repair, Misc. (76)
Aerospace (37)
Communications (48)
Personal Services (72)
Restaurants (581)
Pharmaceuticals (283)
Rubber Manufacturing/Products (30J
Cotton Gins (072)
Hotels/Motels (70)


TOTAL STATES
PROVIDING ASST.

41
41
41
39
37
36


TOTAL BUSINESSES
REACHED

63000
27005
1614775
44661
1192
3052
34 1 16356
34
33
33
32
32
31
31
31
31
30
30
29
29
28
27
27
27
26
26
26
26
9560
1486
704
1391
7482
5918
1942
6335
884
988
423
415
3176
489
431
660
1775
2530
381
681
371
26! 287086
25
25
25
24
24
24
23
23
23
22
22
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
18
754
1390
559
459
733
382
462
211
266
477
859
566
136
140
95
64
94
114
419
77
17j 67
17 208
16 299
161 135
15 81
15 j 39
151 293
151 222
151 701
141 113
14 410
14 | 254
13! 126
13
13
109
312
131 47
111 66
11
10
68
56
10 91
Veterinarians (074) I 9 1 25
Transit (passenger) (41) [ 8 8
Leather/Fur (31, 237) i 7! 39

-------
  UJ
  o


  1
  (0
  0)
  (0
  O
  UL

  O
  UJ

  UJ
  o
  K

it
UJ (0
MI Q£
-JO

ss
I- UJ
  CO
  O
  E
  o.


  o
  X







II!
O
\SS|STAN
HIGH PRIORITY INDUSTRY SECTORS TARGETED FOR -i

V-
<
0
i
CL










Dry cleaners, sawmills.



CD
CO
.0
JO
<







-o
itors target
Our program works on an as-requested basis. Only one request received. No industry sec



CO
1
<

C
-1 £ H § %
^11 0

•c
•a
o
(0
£
Ilizerfacili
Agricultural aerial applicators, gasoline stations, saw mills, anhydrous ammonia ferti



rkansas
<
& ~z.
0 CM
Is.
>, "55 "S
IM
? O) CO
"S D. S
(0 | **^
|1 a
« £ C
1st
O ® e
£ > E
 » S.
O CO *•*•
a. . ^~
CA has many priorities based on geographical location and air quality concerns. Some res
(ordered by most frequent submittals) include dry cleaners (3), architectural coatings (2)
auto body shops (2), asbestos remediation (2), gas stations (1), agricultural burning (
treatment facilities (1).



1
"co
O









Wood finishers, dry cleaners, hog farms, restaurants, auto repair, auto body.



olorado
O









cc
z



onnecticu1
0









cc
z



elaware
Q









Dry cleaners, transportation services for tourist bus idling.
CD
la
|
"5
O
ts
b

1
"5
O a
= 1
•! 1
•Q c*
11
•a "o
5 "o>
o ••
til
calendar fo
urface cos
Distributed dry cleaner compliance calendars for 2000 and completed Spanish version of <
and distributed factsheets for human and animal crematories. Usage tracking chart for a
development for disemination in 2001 .



CO
•TO
o
LL
CU
*
H
z
1
Q.
(^
Q.
0)
o
1_
c
1
We provided three multimedia workshops for dry cleaners in 2000 and co-sponsored a do
Pollution Prevention Assistance Division.



.CD
1
o









Dry cleaners, construction.



1
I









Dry cleaners, chromium electroplaters, rock crushers, auto body shops.



o
cc
2
                                                                        <
                                                                        z

-------
«? 5"
LU  §
HI  C
-i +:
m  c
<  °
P o
n


i

i
f






i

Ul
o
1 	 HIGH PRIORITY INDUSTRY SECTORS TARGETED FOR ASSISTA
<
on
0
o
t£
a.
_
-\
















SBAP worked with IEPA on an annual emissions report survey and clean fuel fleets


—
j

======
•o
o
o
5

fi
9
L. K
K _JJ
3 J? CO
o £ ™
* ««
=> o> .2
c x: Q.
a .. o
E sl
ts s «
3 .— '55
T3 U "*•••
o «S 2
k. **~ Jr
O.J) ®
•o !o w
« « •£
Dry cleaning; vehicle maintenance shops; collision repair/auto refinishing; fiberglass reinforc
furniture manufacturers; printers; hospitals; schools; toxic release Inventory reporters- child
ventilation, air conditioning, and refriaeration contractors and suppliers: degreasers; metal fli


CO
CO
_
=====:
=====
















IWRC assisted facilities in Scott County in completing the required emissions inventory report


CO
___
H



•o
c
CO
52
0>
CD

C
5=
3
c
E
of
.£
•6
Industrial cleaning, printers, dry cleaners, secondary aluminum production facilities and foun
electroplaters, agricultural service centers.


CO
CO
CO
CO
^
===
1
















o:
z


1-
o
^
'c
CD
*:
— —
~[


c
o
•o
d>
JO
CO
c
CO
£
CO
•o
13
£}

O
0
C
0)
High priority industry sectors were not targeted due to the long term illness of the previous SBO Th
October 25.
>,
0
r-
Jeffersol
=====
~J
















Auto body shops, auto dealers, dry cleaners, sandblasters, ship builders, stormwater


>uisiana
\^
_i
_ —
=



'c
CD
£
.Q.
o-
CD
"D
JB
TO
£
C3)
C
I
o
_c
Air quality and toxics issues for automotive servicing, especially auto repair and auto body shoos
vendors. '


CD
C
'co
2
===
~|
















Dry cleaners were targeted, as the state increased their inspections for air compliance


T3
CD
&
CO
___
1
















Metal finishing, solvent users, toxics users
SB
"CD
(O
assachu
2
i
S
8_-
o<= S.
? m °-
s-i-o o
w 'to S = £
•S CO ffl 3 0
g w £ E E
** TO CD ^* ^3
S-i «a £
o Ji — S j£
o £? 0 'S
o ® « § -S
I S 3 § !
CD 7*4 ^^ Q xw
O fl) ^? O 
£
O
is
======
=

>
o
f*
to
~
£
CD
O

CD

"c
Q)
Q.
3
O"
0)
+*
m
Fiberglass product manufacturing, small manufacturers, auto body, auto repair, farm implem<
ground storage tank owners/operators.


innesota
S
-
~1
















Cities and local governments.

.__
ississipp
2
_ _
—

















-------
UJ  §
UJ
_J
ffi
<












HIGH PRIORITY INDUSTRY SECTORS TARGETED FOR ASSISTANCE
5
^f
1














Sand and gravel, asphalt producers, dry cleaners, wood furniture manufacturers.


OS
1
o
s












a:
z


S
CO
2
.Q
CO
Z












Sand and gravel, concrete and aggregate, construction.


CO
•a
CO
CD
Z












di
!E
!•=
"3
"5
•o
o
.a
|
(0
bT
CO
a
£
|
£
Jd
w Hamps
CD
Z




"w
15
E

c
ce
**
3
(0
g
O
_^J
Dry cleaners, auto retailers, auto body repairs, plastics facilities, printing/graphic arts, governmeni
finishers, metal plating.


CD
S2
CD
—3
CD
Z





O)
_c
(1)
(0
CD
"35
2
A
CO
Asphalt plants, aggregate crushing operations, concrete batch plants, auto paint and body shops,
operations, oil and gas production.


w Mexico
CO
z








o
"y
£
£
i

Gasoline stations, dry cleaning facilities, printers (the latter with NY City Department of Environmental


1
§
CD


Q)
Q-"CO .>
03 ^* 0}
— o "ti flJ co
-o ^ £> ® «
© 05 03 rt\
1? 1^ 1
*- O .£ "D S
CD .Q CD "5 CO
«j 1 .c 2 c
co "5 ® "§j o
"5 'o •" c co
Dry cleaning - distributed an air quality compliance calendar to all perc dry cleaners in the state.
Cotton ginning - Air Quality became very concerned about particulate emissions, especially toxic air polli
meetings between Air Quality and the industry. These concerns are ongoing and will likely result in a spe
operate outside the regulations until new regulations specific to this industry can be promulgated. We will
Ready mix concrete - Air Quality became very concerned about toxic air pollutant emissions and threatei
permit for these facilities. We facilitated further study and air dispersion modeling proving that Air Quality'
CO
c
CO
O
r
o



-2
o
~
£i
S
CO
cfT
«
_o
is
0)
CD

Medical waste incinerator operators, oil and gas production facility operators, general contractors,
schools (asbestos), automotive repair, construction sites, feed lots.

CO
1
CO
Q
€
o

CO
Q. 5—
3 O C
C ^ "^ CO C!
CD ^ .^ CD
_.. co — 2 m
ill !l
•o c _ § •=•
C '3 £2 £ 03
| .£ « .2 !
O CD ^ » yj
i - .E "S *
/M — ._ CD U—
SBAP targeted metal finishers/metal parts fabricators for assistance because state RACT coating rule:
1999. The rule change requires metal painting operations using over 3 gallons/day in the Cleveland, Akrc
use VOC-compliant coatings. Previous exemption level was 10 gallons/day. This assistance effort began
into 2000 with mailings and on-site visits.
SBO targeted dry cleaners for financing assistance and conducted outreach efforts to auto dealers and
For the latter two, grants were approved to the respective trade associations to develop "Environmentally
manuals and deliver them through seminars.


0
'£.
O












Dry cleaners, metal finishers, chromium electroplaters, automotive repair.


lahoma
.x
0












Automotive repair shops, auto body shops, dry cleaners.


o
1_
O












Korean dry cleaners, lithographic printers.

CO
nnsvlvani
CD
Q.
                                                                                                                          CO
                                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                                            z
                                                                                                                            <
                                                                                                                            z

-------
UJ
UJ

OQ
<
D
C










tu
o
z
*
I £2
RGETED FOR ASS
£
0)
K
O
HIGH PRIORITY INDUSTRY SECT
S
II i
II PROGR,



















a:


.0
a:
£
! %
a.

















.
&
Auto body, metal finishers, fish processors, the arts communi

•D
CO
_eo
CD
1
i§














rards, dry cleaners
^i
CD
Q
cc
>
CO
Automotive repair shops, automotive paint and body shops, s
CO
_c
1
CO
O
£
O
w
=



















IT
Z

CD
c5
^
&
o
 c a*
•*; to CD
to fe =
ir CD ^:
ase, and septage w
coaters; wastewat
id auto service facil
CD 0) C
S. « «
O) n ^
^t -B
^ 3 1?
^ Ii O
O) <" ja
Metal finishers; industries subject to stormwater regulations;
anhydrous ammonia storage facilities; concrete batch plants;
systems; small quantity generators of hazardous waste; auto
cleaners; printers.


CO
CO
X
£
===



















Wood furniture manufacturers.


CO
5
	 :



















Vehicle service, wood products.


II Vermont



















t£


CD
'c
s



















£
0)
CO
0)
u
•a
co"
a
o
CO
1.
'S
a.
2
•o
n
>i
?
ja
o
<

CO
1
.CO
_Cfl
c
e
>



















cc


II Washington
CO
CO
f s
. V
8?
% S.
CD CD
c -a
co c
J c
_ CO
c c
E -i
* CO
^ JZ
IB 'ft
it: O
11
jntory assistance to
100 and $2,000, the c
> =>-
.£ rr
C^
0 £
« CD
CO 03
SBAP was trained in the iSteps software so we could provide emis
of great benefit to four small businesses, as they each saved betw
consultant perform a complete emission inventory

CO
(West Virgin!















i
CM
i_
CD
^
Dry cleaners - mailed compliance calendars for July 2000-Decem


II Wisconsin
i

0
O
1
o
of
_u
*5
C
CO
CO
•a
c
CO
c
_o
"5
•o
ties, petroleum pro
o
45

1
Auto repair, auto body shops, construction contractors, medl<
recreation.
1

Wyoming

-------
TABLE E-4
SBTCP ASSISTANCE
TOTAL BUSINESSES REACHED*



PROGRAM

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Maricopa Cty, AZ
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Jefferson County, KY
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio*
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee


TOTAL BUSINESSES
REACHED

2441
1
7162
1573
7520
6292
X
NR
NR
493
10283
32394
786
203
27759
78945
1868
L 55311
1772
415
9171





























1238]
401
1260
12479
66814
3279
2223
1063
528
2887
973
35869
1327
18044
16841
X
1298827
1055
1754
36513
184
X
15081
X
251057
Texas 23109
Utah 449
Vermont
Virginia
Virgin Islands
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
TOTAL
Total w/out OH pubs

752
15802
2110
46062
810
13853
8799
2,125,832
875,710

















































































I










NOTE* "Total businesses reached" as reported by the states is











used as the "official" count for this report. | <
Some programs tried not to "double count" total businesses reached.
Note: Four programs indicated which industry sectors they assisted,
but did not keep data (CO. NO. Rl. SO).



Two programs did not track activities by industry sector (NH, NV).
Two programs did not respond to this question (CT, DE).

OH - Include 1 .250,122 publications. i

-------
    Ul
    Q.
    Ul
    O
    to.
  o'
fi
Ul I
   • eo -
   I U|
   > co
    co
    ui

    55
    g
           3
           •3
        jJi
           II
           £  S

           II

           II
           5:5
                               SS
                               ^S
N '£ 9!'

53 Si.
       Ill
                                              ^
 SI'S
 51-J3
 i|S
i-B »
Q:O
                      ?K
                      •"Is
                i'fl! .
«!
                                                            Si
                                                           gg
                                                          'as;
                                                          :£
                                                                SI
                                     CO CO CO!CM
                                                                    SK
                              mi in
                              m!1*-
                              coir»
ryland ____
ssachusetts
                                            SSISls'.
             _l&
             22
                             eoico
                             cn'rv
                             CM,m
                                                            IIS
                                                            58
                                                           sTs
                                                                                             8is!
                                                     'S^
 IJlsi
|||;||i;il!l
                                                                                   |o>| K^
                                                                                   CM |  t-
            1:1 ill
               !""!
                                                                                           ,m eoico
                                                                                           10 

sl!l>

-------

-------
   §
   o
   
-------
IU ®

UJ C
—I V

m S
< °
So






















, OJ
UJ
S
O
-.8
a.
£
 Hotline Directory listing key state and national
SBAP advertisement distributed for use in chai






CD
•o
'C
_o
LL




t:
CD
CD
O)
CO
c
CO

^^
8
Si
•g
w
•a
T3
CD

«
E
"c
o
o
£
i.
o
o
U
£
o
03"
.0
0
£
T3
CO
CO
CD
> Dry Cleaner Compliance Calendar (updated, e
practices)





CO
'§?
o
CD
CD























"to
^
E
±s
3
O CD 2
Iu ^- **~
CO « = OT
— f* "S CD
1 S o 1
Dry Cleaning Calendar (revised, multimedia)
• Compliance Assistance Brochure (revised)
• Environmental Health Administration List of Pe
> Compliance Assistance Office Slide Show Pre!
Minimizing Construction & Demolition Waste bi
' Notice to All Lamp Handlers brochure
Air Pollution Control & Construction Activities s






CD
%
CD

O)
'c
CO
0>
O
£>
Q
£
03
"S
CO
T3
1
CO
.g
'CO
03
E
UJ
BI_
«t
CD
CD
>,
£
S""
_
^
"1
CD
O.
"CD
_g
13
z
CD
£
Dry Cleaner's Air Quality Compliance Guide to
Facilities
•





o
£2
CD
•o





























ID
Clean Air Clips quarterly newsletter
2001 Recordkeeping Calendar for Dry Cleaner
• •





03
'o
_C
—

-------
UJ  §
LJJ  C







0)
H

UJ
^
U
o
0
0.
o
CD
CO
o
o
CM








5
O
O
Q£
a














"S
CD
en
"5
&
ID f"
(0 CD
r— >
| |
CO c
o —
Q c
«|
E &
C C gj .^ ,^— ^
8 « = « "S
> c t£ ^= S
lii ^ g 5 £ ^
Q. '5. co .E cB '5 ^ "> £ S
ro 53 ^- o co co ~" 2 ""^ pn *jji ^^ "^^
^3 S» O T^ c *^** i— ^t *^ ^^ w QD Q)
tg o § a O 1 cj 2 a! > S ITS w 2 £2
2 CD 0 "-
E o -o
1 1 1 1

****



(D
C
CD
£
CO
0)
C
'ra
c
CD
"5
u
'c
CO
-5
(D
E

en"
•s
.22
j~
S
CO
e
.2
"5.
E §
CD v
3
0
^





























neous
Pollution Prevention Annual Report
IDEM Annual Report
CTAP brochure
CTAP postcard
Mercury postcard to pharmacies
Stormwater workshop postcard
_CD
"53
u
.2
^



























CO
3
C
CO
Iowa Environmental Audit Training M










CO
                                                                                                                                        CO

-------
HI §

UJ C
-IS
CD C



















to
ttl
i
o
O
Q.
£
£
w
•o
, o






£
cr
o
c
tc
ex

co
c
.g
"5
3
0?
3
c
E
c

__
0
CO
1 s
"c o

c 5*
"~* CO
"§ "
32 CO
to CN o
8°- 1
C "O n-f
I S °
o o o {g
S E 'c o c
a.  o m -o
3 ^ 3 tT1 S
Annual update of policies, publications, and bi
Metal Finishers and Electroplaters Regulatory
sets
New USDOT Regulation Changes Affect More
Mercury in the Environment, Coming From Yoi
How to Calculate Running Totals (dry cleaners
Have You Considered "Wet" Dry Cleaning?
New NESHAP Affects Secondary Aluminum P
c—
CO
"o
CO




CO
CO
ID
(C





>;
"S
CO
I
CO
-3 o
I • 1
I o>"
1 i |
co £ ~
rfT J— (tt

03 Q. g
£ O .—
>» O 0
^ " ~
1 ? § |
-§ 1 1 '-s
Q. To = '3
~
C
'eo
3
03

V)
?
o
Q.
0
to cy
CO C
CO CD
O -fj
C 'C
'to §
-Q .a
= "D
CO O
i 'S
s !
-o £
ff CO
1 1
(O m
Quarterly newsletters - 3,620 published and di
Dry Cleaner Compliance Calendars - 800
Guidance for Environmental Reporting Requin
General brochures - 100
2000 Annual Report - 320








CO
c
CO
'co
o





















J2
CO
Zj
O
CO
£
Automotive and Autobody Repair Vendor and








o
'o




























•z.




C!
£•
a













c
CO
a
E


k_
a
§
CO
If.
1
a
o
<
£K
1-
Case Study - Hampden Papers (elimination of





_0
"S
c
c
c
^CI
CO
c

-------
UJ C
—I ^
QQ c






















CO
^»
Z
Ul
5

o
o
0
CL
O
CO
• 0
~ ,o
• o
CM






s
t£.
O
§
0.



E co -a
S=5 £
CO ° CD
"I £
O> CO t
co) S >;
"t £ ^
O TO o <0
Q. O) O 3
£ 05 C
§ 7§ S 'o
.C 3 •»•*
O o TO -Q
C CO CO 
Emission Inventory Workbook to assist businesses implemen
Emission Inventory Calculation Worksheets - surface coating
gas production, municipal solid waste
Michigan Manufacturers' Guide to Environmental and Safety
SBAP in conjunction with Ml Department of Consumer and In
municipalities; and environmental, safety and health professil







CO
TO
s:
o
5





























Self Audit Checklist for Fiberglass
Self Audit Checklist for Dry Cleaners







S
o
CO
cc
c
_c
^





























Dry Cleaner Recordkeeping Calendar (for 2001 distribution)







'QJ
o.
CO
CO
'co
.CO
5

































t£
Z


o
CO
.CO
^





























outreach newsletters
Dry Cleaners
Wood Furniture Manufacturers
Concrete, Asphalt, and Sand and Gravel Producers
Dry Cleaner Assistance Calendar
£
co
3
T3
JE . . .


CD
"c
0
5

































X.
z


S
CO
2

0)
Z





























New permit format for Class II sources







CO
"8
CO
§
z

TO
_c
o
N

5?
»
it-
CD
CO
£
U—
c
o
c
o
to
c
0
c
CO
ffi
•a
3
•o ^
~. C
o —
o "S
CN "5
C O)
™* CD
S^ o —
CD *r^ 00
Automotive Sector Environmental Compliance Manual (updal
Spray Booth Manual (began development in 1999 for publica
considerations, booth design and operation, and environmen1






CO
CL
CO
>
CD
Z





















8.
O ^
CO *"
•££ Q-
§ •<=
3 »
~° te
c P
Program brochure (for distribution in mailings, trade shows, a
Program flyer (for distribution in mailings, trade shows, and w
Program video
Audio and television public service announcements
2001 Dry Cleaner Calendar - Korean
Banner (with proaram logo to display at events)







o
2
CD
%
CD


-------
CD c
eo
K
UU
5
3
O
O
Q
0.
-g
m-f

09
. 0
:, O
•-• o
M






i
2
o
o
ce.
Q.







§
CO

1
r>
IS
Automotive Paint and Body Shop
Dust and Health
ets
Jewelry Shop Environmental Compliance
Wood Furniture Manufacturer Environmental C<
Print Shop Environmental Compliance
Natural Event Action Plan
EOJ
_. £
J «
8. . 1

• • •

o
o
'x
CD
Z















a:
~2.




I New York







03
.g
^3
I'i
X CO
2000 Dry Cleaner Air Quality Compliance Caler
Press release sent to news media and trade as
1-STOP bi-fold color business card
1-STOP 4-page color brochure
1-STOP 1-page introduction letter






CO
c
1
CO
0
i
o















CH
^


m
'o
^
&
£
O
% §
^ (0
(* ^
I s
5 Q.
~ 1?
g •§
E c
2 5
g «§
O CO
l_ C

-------































"§
^^
K.

































co
c
CD
Multimedia, state-specific automotive m
Perc dry cleaners calendars
Printers fact sheet





(0
c
1
(0
O
P-
"5
Q
CO
•a
c
CO
D3
_C
1
CD
a.
"c
c
2
c
CD _05
O CO
"CD »
"O Cl>
'5 £
O) c
Q. ~~
3 S2
"to O
1 *^
y
O to
CO j^>
.2 ^o
<° %
CO C
^
Q_ (3
o 5P
II
li

O qj
c p
.2 i
« 2
SD Environmental Permitting and Regul
regulation and covers all sectors of envi






JO
J3
CO
Q
^
"3
O
CO




















^ .
CD
.2
o
CO
Q.
c "5
o •=
*3 CD

'c c
CD c
^ CO Q.
|ll
CD ^
~ C C
O O O
2 "c "c
E CD CD
&1 £
Energy workshop slide presentation
Energy workshop material packet
Dry cleaner test prep slide presentation
Dry cleaner test prep material packet
CAAA Title VI (ozone depletion) worksh
Automotive Compliance and Pollution P
Automotive Compliance and Pollution P
SBAP skit and slide presentation







CD
CD
en
to
CD
C
c

h


































Grandfathered fact sheet
Advocate rules review (6 issues)
Program services brochure
Illegal dumping postcards
Six metal finishing postcards









to
CO
x
CD
H





































o:







sz
CO
5

-------
UJ
o

c
ffl c
< o


/

















1' '

,»
£
t
z
Ul
.;S
O
0
o
Q.
1
CD
tn
0
• o
o
CM




f
QJ
O
o
ce.
Q.





























^
03
03
"5.
g^
R .2
" ®
CD Q
>» p
Wood Products Compliance Guide Book
Auto finishing pamphlet
Metal Fabrication Compliance Guide Book (not
Auto Body Compliance Guide Book (not yet cor







^-»
C
o
fit
w
^==^=^
































Grasping for Air - VOC and HAP guide
Loan fund fact sheet
Marketing materials
Dry Cleaning Calendar (under development)








CO
c
E>
>
'





















O3
C
ie

E
03
Q.
~o

CO
2
O3
S
Q.
03
SBAP permit applications (3)
Fact sheet informing small businesses about th
Recordkeeping forms
Rules and regulations for small businesses
Web site




co
T3
c
_co
CO
c
S5
^=^===



































CC
~2.




^
01
c
£
CO
CO
§
=
































POTW follow-up survey
2000 Dry Cleaner Compliance Calendar




CO

C
s>
>
^mt
CO
03
§
-






















o~
0
o
CM
>>
"C
CO
03
^

!* E
! I
c o
•5 o_
Clean Air Advisor (2 issues)
Dry Cleaning Calendar (prep work in 1999, acti
Air Pollution 101 presentation
Issues to Help Business Understand WDNR Aii
EPA's HPV Enforcement Policy







C
(/)

o
o
CO
5
==^==
;,
•a <5
c 0
CO CO
. "S C33
E E ><
S £
o> c ®
S « -2
Q. S Q.
r £ E
§§8
ro oj to
§lo
Sl3
55 ™ =
co $ -o
CO O 03
CD <= §
0 » CO
c •— "'
CO •g CO
Ifl
8 |¥
ra5 °-
c ^ co
0-2 2
rof —
c 1— c
0 . 0
= m -S
J 03 ir
o s o
° §.=
•c •§•<
co .y
til
-o-o m
£C 03
._ CO JC.
ce of Outreach, through the efforts of an intern h
ed an environmental guide for small businesses
iblished in hard copy for distribution throughout 1
E g-SJ
SI?
.C 0 0)
t— Ti j->




O)
C
"E
§.
§
                                                                                                                           oo
                                                                                                                            1

                                                                                                                            !
                                                                                                                            I

-------
   (0
   Q

   O



   HI
h-1
u^o

UJ UJ
   UJ
   CO

   I







NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS
S
2
0
g
0.









Dry cleaner calendars mailed to 135 facilities.



Cu
CO
.£>
JO
<


2
o
CO
CO
in
to
CO
"3
.2
*i

No outreach efforts conducted. A small business assistance bulletin is posted on our web page, but



5
CO
JO
<


_
ro
(A
CO
I
CU
a.
.=£
Both small businesses and regulators have a better understanding of the rules and how they will be
businesses are involved In air quality rule development.



CO
8
•c


CO
CD
1
o
1
"5
£
el
"5 c
•K §
1|

Creating a mass e-mail list of approximately 250+. E-mails are a fast, free, environmentally-friendly
link to our web site where users can get information immediately and, in the case of workshops, reg!
2?
O
CO
CL
1
CO
«^


2
1
.y E
— CO
a. o
n
i °
a> £
50 ^,
0 =
^ CO
i's-
§ &
•s «
V 3)
Statewide fly-Ins are particularly effective in fostering trust and accountability between the Departrr
Regional Solid Waste Management District Directors provided business contacts around the stat
program.


CO
CO
CO
c
CO
•£
<

|i
C « B
CO Q- 3
2^i
ss community.
rams; partner
newsletters; a
ing programs.
1 2 if!
_Q 
•5
>•
One-on-one site visits helped many small businesses come into compliance. One-on-one dellvel
especially automotive multimedia information.


o
T3
S
o
o
O







CC

"3
o
1
o
O







z


0)
k.
"55
Q
£
12
co 
^8
CO 'C
CO 0-
V u_
CO 0
E -o .
o - o
*- CO O
We sponsored a workshop for the Atlanta Dry Cleaners Association in November. We were asked
annual meeting, so we adjusted our agenda to their program. The Association gave away "generou
attendees, which were provided by local vendors. More than 100 dry cleaners attended this worksh



.2
o
V
0
                                                                                                                           i
                                                                                                                           K
                                                                                                                           t
                                                                                                                           •5

-------






I
o
o
0£
Q.


ner calenda
because of i
(w 0}
O >
»V
f?&
IT l^_
Q co


1
CO

developed E
iHAP regulat
on, providinc
Q- w -a
< LU W
m z o
?? £ »
9g<


0
CO
2
had particuli
es that came
O co
> tr.
S 2
0 <£
ZE


03
'o
C
=
.0
•3.

-------
UJ  §

UJ  C
-J  •«:

ffl  5
<  °
So





NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS
0
O
tc.
a.

CD
y
__ C
| « g S
S -i ±T i"
•9 ** <° o
III"
On-site visits (either cold calls or prearranged) have been an effective form of communication, particularly when se
materials are provided to the business. Cold calls resulted in a detailed information exchange approximately 55% o
Industries such as hospitals and vehicle maintenance shops benefitted from continual education (coupled with on-si
hazardous waste issues. Meetings and workshops for targeted industries were held in locations convenient to them
assistance site visits were scheduled for anyone requesting such assistance.

 » J: « W —
•| £ |£ o •§ 1 |
0 C C BJ — -* 3 _.*
<— •= r- S: — 03/^1 Oo
Mefa/ finishing/electroplating - SBAP made 22 calls and 13 site visits to assist chromium electroplaters complete tl
operating permit application forms. All electroplaters that received assistance were able to comply with the air perm
IDEM's work with metal finishers and POTWs through the Strategic Goals Program (SGP) has greatly improved con
feedback with this industry sector. We anticipate individual facility compliance will improve as facilities are made av\
confidential compliance and technical assistance available to them. They also have been encouraged to participate
development of SGP incentives, including the development of a 5-Star Environmental Recognition Program, to b
to individual facilities as they make progress in achieving facility-based SGP goals. Five workgroups developed thrc
have noted considerable interest and participation by metal finishers. Workgroups include RCRA Issues, Financial .
Assistance, POTW/Pretreatment Issues, Recruitment, and Recognition/Incentives.




to
£2 co" &
o .2 05 -o
"S CO C r- m
SE.1 §-oS
fin??
is i?| S
Multimedia compliance pilot - External meetings were held separately with the wood furniture, foundry, and metal fii
the beginning and throughout the pilot project to introduce the objectives of the pilot and key staff involved, provide i
and answer any questions. We reiterated compliance assistance currently available from CTAP and the IN Clean IV
Technology and Safe Materials Institute. We also asked for input on compliance incentives of interest to each sectc
superior performance. Two waste determination workshops were presented at the request of the wood furniture se
compliance information packets were developed and distributed. These and other supplemental information also
CTAP's wood furniture sector web site.




a.
O  O TO
OJ jjj ?
.£ to 
-------
til  2
LJJ  C
-J *:
ffi  S
<  °
2 o
n

NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS


?
O
O
oc
a.
—
	 — 	 	
, which greatly increases our program visibility and decreases travel expenses. Traditional outreach methods such as t
and workshops, continue to be popular and effective, with this year being the busiest for incoming hotline calls On-site
nents, which enable program staff to address concerns specific to the business, have become increasingly popular this i
:h numbers surpassing any other year and neariy triple the number of on-site visits from 1999. Successful publication eff
the dry cleaner multimedia compliance calendars, were continued due to high demand from this industry sector KS
ty became responsible for maintaining the SBAP web page and publishing the quarterly newsletter, AIRLines The web
irrently being updated, will continue to make available electronic forms of all publications and the quarterly newsletter
continued to assist local safety and environmental networks and will continue to provide information on the local meetinq
10 cannot attend state or regional gatherings.
§*J fm cfl *-^ jt* #A "^ w *7fi rf "^
§§a3c*5<§2oo.5
ilillillillil


CO
CO
CO
c
CO
*
•
••

with the KY Pollution Prevention Center on seminars. Distributed success stories about KBEAP
O)
c
1
1

>.
.*
u
J3
C
CD
X.
"I

9usiness association meetings and work with other business services to reach additional small businesses

•o
1

-------
UJ  §

UJ  C
-J *:
CQ  c











NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS
S
te.
o
o
te.
Q.
__
H S "g

05 05 "C £ "ffl *"

-^* « c «fc J5 '^
51 . g, gf-S s
*Si!fU
 ^
c "S •§ CD CO" CD •&
in o c (£. E * ts
g a « ^ § c to
o -5 n o o o c
_r 2 o j- I «- ~
Assisted 2,670 small businesses comply with state and federal environmental rules. Of these, '
businesses. Participated in 49 conferences, seminars, workshops, and manned informatior
Statewide radio interview on the SBAP program. Distributed 800 environmental compliance <
Spearheaded the Gulf Coast States Abrasive Blasting Committee, which produced a document
Practices (RMP). Two seminars were conducted to discuss the document in Houston, TX and
distributed. Maintain a hotline and web page on DEQ's web site, and provide e-mail consulta
SCORE chapter to assist small businesses in getting established. Presented P2 certificates s
businesses who requested a P2 audit of their facility. Linked to LA CAP web site.


CO
CO
o


05
Q)
**—
>^
CO
•o
6
CO
nt trials (e.g.,
a
'3
CT
CD
Distributed applicable vendor lists to small businesses for which vendors offered incentives for
trial period).



03
c
"3
 o a>
u> £ *- •* «>
a> t.  <» o
1— o = J2 g
iiiii
^ '•= E co c
D. CO E ~ C
?1&I4
'= m "S CO CD
«• V U (—
& 11 Sf
Q. £ 5 c =
CB -o 2 "5 •=
5 S « 2 =
^- co m c ^
MDE has found it effective to hold multimedia permitting meetings with businesses that are ir
involve the business, representatives from the SBAP or Environmental Permits Service Center,
appropriate permit programs. This allows a business to hear directly from the permit programs
for their business, how long until the permits are received, and the application process. These i
establish contact with the permit staff with whom they will be dealing. If the meeting is early eru
business can make changes to address the Department's concerns before construction starts.


•o
S
CO










a>
Workshops and seminars directed to metal finishers, departments of public works, and schoo!
,
1i>
at
1
CO
(O
 E £ co JS '= -
0 S " ,„- ~O 2 m
o vt -o CO g> o &
•— co 3 Speed's
' TB f -i 1 "S 2 S
.C £. t C — C D) S
•||° WE!™^
5£.c .£-5coM§
I"!I1!«P
S.e|al-slcD-s
i|l| I 111 1
Q^3£'C*mCI
UJ'CD-2?S^tt>CB'"
SBO - The primary methods of outreach are via the Ml Economic Development Corporation's (l\
businesses to the SBO and SBAP staff at the Ml Department of Environmental Quality. Additioi
MEDC's Account Managers. They call on companies and redirect their requests for environmei
office. During FY99-00, the SBO also promoted its services through a promotional ad in the IV
SBAP - During FY99-00, the SBAP, working in conjunction with the SBO, Ml Department of Cor
various industry organizations, co-sponsored a series of statewide workshops to promote the c
guidebook that details all federal, state, and local regulations for the environmental, health, anc
facility. SBAP also conducted a series of orientation workshops for state and local regulatory <
understanding about the guidebook's content and availability among field staff. SBAP continue;
customers throuqh its technical assistance hotline and statewide workshops.


c
CO
D)
1
I

-------
UJ  S>

UJ  C
-I  5=
m  c




I-'







NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS
5
2
0
o
tn
a.
—
~= "°
_- £, tO i_
0 0 CD 5 i.
•£! Q- *5 T3 O5
* o « s §
•§ 8. 1 1 1
fi ^O d« ;rr A i
00 2 P CM
.t oj *" o *~
-I £ >> $ CO
H|ll
SSlsf
CO — r- -°
(M 5 (S IO 2
CM C .52 S< o
•o .2 B ° T

^ rn ^^ w P CD C j^ «! M ^» CA •^^ W := (0 CO Q> &? CD V (E |j r~ *» •5 I CO s CD a o w ~ c eo •> CD 3 Word of this program through those who have used the services in the past seem to be the b assistance are greatly appreciated by business and industry. Another effective strategy is folk workshop or seminar. « j£ CO CO iT JD CD Z === co -a to c to Developing generic fact sheets and other outreach materials in cooperation with county air i allowable to make outreach more effective. In some instances, the SBAP resources are levera the county agencies distribute the products CO T3 1 Z == to 09 > 2 ? c o >, J2 1« 11 £ £ T3 9- Industry sector-specific compliance manuals seem to be the most effective outreach metho Compliance manuals that also address other health and safety issues seem to be the most at .i CO Q. E CO I CD = CD .2 -M 5 — O •§ to 2 o- ^ 2.*£ fci 03 ?s *•* "JS 03 CD CO *•• Q) *O £o § TO" .2 = ^ 5 « S n E g S §!§ t> ° 52 « £3: m m rf" j= 2 S ^s« Arranged cooperative mailings with various trade associations or had the trade association d< regulatory assistance workshops/conferences. Used Internal and external partnerships to le service announcements for radio and television. Distributed a seven-minute video about the partners. Produced banner with program logo to display at events >s CD {0 CD —3 Z ===== tt CD « S 3 S j= CD U = s u (Q £-; CD C 0 CD CO E — Q. 0 CO S = CD s-s 11 1 g. •c §* Q. S __ 1_ Fact sheets and open houses reached numerous government officials, small businesses, anc on-slte Inspections for regulatory development and compliance, and committee meeting's fo reached numerous small business operators 8 X CD ^r ^ 1 Z ===== £ I t£ I


-------
^ -a
LU  «
LU  C
_J -.5
CD

NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS
5
^
O
O
u.
a.



Postcard mailings continue to be an effective way for the program to disseminate information to businesses on important regulatory
requirements and compliance deadlines. SBEO developed postcards with simple, single messages as a means of informing
businesses. Postcards are less expensive than letters to mail, and the simple messages catch the attention of business owners.
Once the business owner contacts the SBEO, they are given the full spectrum of assistance, beyond the one issue described in the
postcard that prompted the phone call. After initial compliance assistance was given, many callers then were referred to the SBAP
for technical assistance.



o
5
CD
Z
(0
2000 Dry Cleaner AQ Compliance Calendar - Sent to every dry cleaner in the state. We received rave reviews on the effectivenes
of the calendar. Many cleaners called to make sure that we would send them a 2001 calendar. Two separate individuals referred to
it as "better than sliced bread." Numerous calls were generated that confirmed that prior to technical phone assistance or receiving
the calendar, the facilities were out of compliance. The calendars practically ensure high compliance rates among the -400 facilities
receiving it.
Cotton ginning - Air Quality became very concerned about particulate emissions, especially toxic air pollutants. We attended all
meetings between Air Quality and the industry. These concerns are ongoing and will most likely result in a special order by consenl
to operate outside the regulations until new regulations specific to cotton ginning are promulgated. We will be involved in every step
Ready-mix concrete - Air Quality became very concerned about toxic emissions and threatened to rescind the general permit for
these facilities. We facilitated further study and air dispersion modeling proving that Air Quality's concerns were excessive. Again,
we were involved in every step of the process.
CD
C
2
CD
O
i
o
z

Mailings, talks to trade groups, and seminars/workshops have been particularly effective.

CO
o
&
.c
o


SBAP maintains good working relationships with inspection/permit writing staff of 12 local field offices. In 2000, we visited 7 field
offices to explain our services and the SBAP mission. 73% of companies requesting site visits were referred by local field staff. On
several occasions, these positive relationships allowed SBAP to interact directly with field inspectors on the company's behalf to
resolve violations (mostly paperwork) found during an inspection. SBO continues to focus efforts on general outreach to the small
business community. This year, we launched quarterly postcards to dry cleaners and auto body collision repair shops to increase
our visibility. We can track "spikes" in hits on our web sites in the week following the mailings. We have continued aggressive
outreach to the state legislature, holding 50 meetings with legislators or their staff members.




o
Ic
0
•n CD
The Metal Finishing Outreach has been quite effective. Through this outreach, we have contacted metal finishers in OK, schedule
a compliance inspection with them, and given them the option of deferring by participating in our outreach program. As a result, w
have had hiqh participation levels and currently experiencing high compliance improvement.


CO
o
CO
^
0
                                                                                                                       £
                                                                                                                       o

-------
UJ  2}

UJ  C
—I  '-S
ffl  c
n








NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS


s
<
K
O
CC.
0.


—[

MS
ti§
E °- co
83 s>
c S «
CD > Si
N P £1
™ - *•• fS \
*% =
%" 5
e£?
® C TO
£ co ,„
nee visits to businesses in the Northwest Portland area because of nu
i, auto repair shops, wood coaters, metal coaters, and machine shops,
currently are tabulating the results of follow-up surveys from these visit!
£ S cc
We made technical assis
Program staff visited printe
prevention information. W



^
o
O)
CD
ir
O
==
1










a:
z

CD
"c
CD
.>
^^
* CO i
Developed an Envlronme
includes a list of industries
requirements, permit flow <
site of the applicable progr
tool. The web site is an or

CD
1
Q
r"
"3
O
CO
=====
	 1
i.=f£ *
. .2 c co e
CO <° CD £ O
» <2 ^3 co "•£
!*£$ E
•« co J?"? fe
§ IQ §5
s 1 « s -
^ -B ^ ^
•* u co e
c CO 05 • 5
P 1 § ® i.
1 aei 2
> S S >< °-
li ll<
K 2 0 S
.£ « -I S
idia marketing strategies during the year. Messages were published
/s print press announcements, radio information spots, and web pages.
ig costs. Local news coverage of a workshop generated additional ass
rtified dry cleaner test prep workshop(s) passed the test they had pre<
n-attendees. Program marketing was accomplished by disseminating {
ies that targeted business and community persons.
£ Z £ S 2 :-e
The program used mass n
association newsletters, n<
intensive and reduced mai
owners who attended our <
higher passage rate than r
other program/project activ


S
CO
CO
CD
c
CD
=====
•o
•o n
co of
•'§
c $
o E
IB E
m £r
o o
= u
_Q »*-
3 0
O. t-
» a
Pi
« ""
Srf
presentations (slide shows and display boards); regulatory notificat!
aff placement in regional offices; regional staff participation In CO(
ees; compliance commitment partnerships.
"2 -a S
Site visits; workshops ar
press releases; hotline; s
local government comml




CO
CD
X
09
K
=====
"~f
-2 'S
c °
eu c
> .0
« to
Pi
*5f
O . CO
QJ ^
03 .c £
eo *= *;
03 ^ •£.
c is ra
sli
^a ^>^:
efl CD *•*
™ 0 S
o 5 E
•c o §
f the UT Business Resource Network (UBRN). As such, we attend va
iful. cost-effective method of distributing our information. We also work
make sure they have information available for business inquiries that c
o %-°
DEQ SBTCP is a member
and this has been a succe
Economic Development ar





.£=
m
S
rj
=====
~|








•§'
-a
1
CD
5
i
CD
£
CD
Sector-specific trainings



"c
o
l-
0)
>
CO
  o

-------
UJ  §
UJ  c
—I '.M
m  c


NOTABLE OUTREACH METHODS




i
o
o
K
Q.

CO
	 o
ling development and use of our SBAP web site (www.deq.state.va.us/osba/smallbiz.html) is
pliance and P2 information. Our monthly average of entries is increasing - averaging 551 in
. Total hits on the home page and other entry pages yielded 7,160 hits in 2000. Also, we fee
outreach continues to be the single most effective means of delivery of compliance assistan
lers in outreach efforts also is very effective.
-1 t co • ±;
'•= ° §) C «
o ra^ S £
Once again, we feel that the
proving successful in providil
2000, 380 in 1999, and 300 i
that direct compliance assi
Use of trade groups and othe

CO

I

0)
nee; 76 brochures, manuals, information packets; 4 seminars; 50 permit and complianc
nspections.
Q} ™"
1 =
° c
o. E
12,746 mailings and corres
assists; 155 on-site assess
CO
c
_os
CO

§






en
•z.
C
"S
"
CO
CO
~ 1 m
g £f^ K •£
'ith Marshall University's Environmental Management Incubator, did a mass mailing to POTV
lay store chlorine in amounts over 2,500 pounds) regarding the provisions of CAA Section 11;
>nducted to determine the effectiveness of this informational outreach. We had 74 responses
From these responses, 8% reduced their inventory below the threshold amounts, while 7 PO
to EPA (although some were submitted before the survey was conducted). Also 60% indicate
Based their RMP awareness, while overall, the SBAP achieved an 89% satisfaction rate.
> C ri • ,„ c
1 ! 8 3 ! •£
'•§ 5 1 « 51 3
In 1999, the SBAP, in conjun
and drinking water suppliers
In 2000, a follow-up survey
318 surveys, a 23% responsi
submitted Risk Management
that the outreach and follow-i
CO
'c
&
^*
to
09

>- CD .
mental Technologist (FET), the state's environmental trade association. Participated in thei
and presentation. Attending air-related meetings sponsored by WDNR (Clean Air Task Fore
ittee, State HAP Rule Revision Advisory Group). Used Marketplace database for industry-

° Jo* e
its
Involved in Federation of E
annual conference (SBAP d
meetings, Permits and Fees
specific mailings.

c
'en
^
O
o
en
 Q) X ** w
® O •«- 09 <0 9-
O C O = "O CO °-
E 0. m JO 0> CO 0
0 IS o> ° tu $ 5
The Department, through its '
newsletter 3 times a year thi
points of contact on a full ran
consistently generates return
with small businesses in targ
articles open doors to busini
contacts routinely provide ne
one site visits in 2000.

O5
°c
O

-------
cn
UJ
o
(0
             <«
           -
          SI
          co co








Comments Requested?
if
QO.
O)O
n a
« o
=>DC




(O
$
^r
!
I
1



E
CO
1
0.








cc
z



cc







CO
3
"CD
CD
Is
to
CD
T3
CD

£
*

<


'co
1
'o
CO
CO
CD
c
•i
Q.

o E1!
•c|«
Z o

O.C  Q
i ^
5 co

LL









Z



^







.gasmallbiz.org

£
*

CD









"S3
"o



z







.hawaii.qov/health/eh/cao

£
*

I

                                                                                                                                      i

-------
LU  §
LU

CO
_c
!C









Comments Requested?
,.£8
1|
a a.
®t:
O)O
m Q.
to a>
=>tf



CO
i
1
i
• a.
.Q
i






E
S
C3)
S
a.









None received - implemented November 2000.



<
E
j=
X
CD
^^
C
"co
J3
CO
assistance/
^~
CD
1
IS
(U
S
"So

s
fe
5

Q










CC
z

CO
CD
o
r-~
T-




co
03
S
en

1

3
2
*

j




eo
imment
o
u
•o
>
.sz
n)
| We have developed a survey, but have not yet rec<


CM
co"
CO




Q.
JS
o
in.us/idem/

£
S
cc

s
^
*

Z










SBAP - Yes, correction of links.


oo
S"





ia.us/sbro

£
S
Tf.

js
fe
*

<








£>
Q
Most electronic correspondence focuses on regula
questions/concerns by individual businesses.



cc
z





CO
q
co
.*:
03
s
en

CD
•o
j£

s
%
§

CO
:£

CD
„, JO
S C
E CD c
JiS.1
%l|
UjCCo
UJ "• U
CQx.cs
i££ E
2 3-JJ
•£a&
Comments or suggestion option is at the bottom of
page; no comments have ever been received. Air i
for Small Business web site does not have a feedb



cc

1
'3
I
rg/nrepc/de
ironment.o
^
§£
12
~; x
> CD
ST3
§.C

^:


CD
_Q

:S
ja
CO
CO
Q.
CD
JZ
We had not requested feedback on our web site in
doing so in the future.



cc





o
-Q
IK
E5
a

XJ
2
CC

>
&
5
>,
o
fc
£

S
CO
J3
CD
5
l~
O

5
.>.
"G
The public may e-mail our technical assistants dire
with questions or comments.



cc



"D.
3
ssistance/s
1
JO
tt)
3s
CO
d-E
«-i
TD-"=
->' X
< *
SXJ
§ c

<

CD
C
CO
5 ™c
i. S'o
3.S-—
o >>eo
5w§
^=•2
c E c

CD CO JS
2 jz"c
We welcome any feedback on our web site. We h?
Toxics & Hazardous Waste Reduction Program wit
charts with specific company information from subn



^





Q.
CD
|

£
2
"S

s
<
g

LU
S










d



CC


— _
1
ci
/permit/sba|
CO
3
1
5
S
CC
CD
•c

S
<
5

Q
2










CC
Z



1




1
"3
q
1
"a
"5
f*-
i

3
<£
S

<
2







J2
"CO
XJ
SBO - Very few ombudsman-specific comments to
SBAP - No, feedback is not actively solicited.


o>
LO
N."



Q.
CD
CO
Cj
CO
1
CD
1
1
^
u

c
a

s
<
5

i


c
o
••=
CO
I

1
CO
3
They like air emission calculators. Can find a lot of


CO
o
1^
co"

i
d.
a
CO
J3
*
I
?
.a.
CO
3
d
a
cc

CC
cc
&

3
2
§

Z
2










CC



z





CO
D
03
_ai
"S

e
1. CD
•c

s
%
s

CO










CC
Z


§
o
«"




a.
£
f
^
1
c
£
"K


-------
ID  §

LU  C
—I  *3
CD  C


Comments Requested?
fl
Q£

5
*


Z

£
rA
Visitors to the SBAP web site can submit questions and request:
further information. Numerous requests are received monthly.

en
S
CM




CO
3
.CD
CO O
It
CD C
& &
§ 5
5 5
**


z

CO
CD ^
We have had significant interest in permit information. We will b
updating our small business web site, and a number of the custc
service features will be blended into a departmental page.
co CD i_
.-=: O) co
jz re co
CM Q- = »
cnco N- §
o_-<- S» « .2
CN <** .S> v-" ffl
T-T- >T- CO




E
o
Q.
CD
>
CD
^
f
5
§


O



CO

s




co
1
to
£
re
CD
j=
^
f
s
5


Q

SS
P O
-^ "7S
SBO - Web page has e-mail response function; only used a few
with positive comments.
SBAP - Web page contains an on-line feedback survey on web s
usefulness. However, we receive very few responses.
o
oo
oo
WCN
AC!
O<
mm
coco
1
re
J^)
JO
hioairquality.org
pa.state.oh.us/dapc/sbc
O CD
^ ^
5 S
5 5
1 5


O



| Yes, we do ask for comments. We have received none thus far.

•z.




CO
3
O
CD
1
d-
Q)
•o
^
s
5
§


o



•z

K.
•z.
E
JZ
X
CD
•a
eq.state.or.us/aq/BAP/ii
T3
^
>
5
5


o:
o



cc
z

o
o
CM_
CO




CO
I
5
to
Q
CD
T3
^
f
5
*


L^



o:
z

a:
z




)mentocomercial.org
*
^
S
5
1


a:
o.

OJ
J3
_re
"m
Yes, we do ask for feedback, but SBAP-specific data are not av<

oc
z




1
CO
.22
JO
CO
^
£
^
1


5



Feedback is requested, but no comments have been received.

00
CM




cdhec.net/sbap
CO
^
^
5
5


0
CO

re
"re
CD f
Yes, request for permitting information (e.g., forms) and databas
information (e.g., PSD reviews) on point sources and monitoring

m
of
O)




CO
3
•6
co
1
0)
^
s
«
§


G
CO



1 We only request the number of times the site was accessed.

co_




"S
6
CD
2
^
s
%
5


Z

co
                                                                                                                                   £
                                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                                   z
                                                                                                                                   IT
                                                                                                                                   2
                                                                                                                                   u
                                                                                                                                   Q.

-------
    o
    C
—
ffl









Comments Requested?
wo
CO
*- ~
yff
QCL
4>C
TOO
« a
w o>
zxr




(0
CO
£
•o
•a
CD
J
1






E
R
C
a









a:






a:
•z.



CO
CO
CD
"33
3
£>
\
11
CO CO
o73
0) CD
X X
CD a
Is
*£
jj a
S2
co a
gg
C C
1 1
**


£










a:






cc
z
8
c
CD
1 i
co !c
CO x
rol «
co1 |
CO CO
CD "55
"co £
^3 OJ
"35 -S
CO .!=
O CO
1 1
3 3
•*-* *•*
3 3
.S2c-2
CO C CO
JZ ^ JZ
CO .C CO
53- CD cr
CD C CD
"P 0~°.
I'M I
§.a i


r—

0 m
co 5
co'jS
1— -i—
tl)_
CO
^ •
^ c?
if
o5
M1^
-„!,_ W
n *^
Just went on-line in mid-2000. We currently are unal
unless they tell us they went on-line, we have no wa>
asked that tracking ability be added.






^
z
E
*i
^_
d
CO
0
1

O
.c
^^
CO
-2
13
CO
^
V
5

«2
pf* fli
C-co
o ?sr
CD CD »
" "§
N."C?




E
£
N
£
"co
a*
a.us/osba/!
>
_ai
cc
"a
c
a

§
^


•sC










o;






cc












">
1
c
•c
1
*


>










a:






cc











>,
1
•£
^
c
§
5
I
*













CC.






CC.
z










§•
1
>
*:
cc
"«
a
•c
I
*


§

_» ^

-------
00=0

UJ  S|

UJ  C
•J ?!


-------









li®
LJJ C
_J yz
m o
i-o















Hi
VTIONAVAILABL
i
f?
z







5
JC
:§*
'•1!

S-s
o£
f
-»•<•
'."s.
:v;.i
, Guidance ,
'Documents/
Pact Sheets
'• , *
o
.-•-: l
Emissions
Inventory
'' as «
II
Q.U.
I*
Regulation
8
if.
53
Program
Description







X
X




x





IS







x










5












x
x
X



U






X
X




«


x


c









X


x
X
x
X


2







X
X



-
x

x


i
X

















Z

X




X
X
X
x


X
x
«
x


CO












x





o
A

X




x
X
x
X


X
x
X
x
x
x
5








X









U












X





i

X




X
-
x
M


«
x
x
x
X

g












x





z

X




x
x
X
X


x
«
x
«
x
X
z












X
X


x

z






X











c








x









Q
X





x





«





§






X











c






»
X




X





ct
x

















<
a

-------
                    ft
            .3
             5
m  §
UJ  C

OQ  C
                    li
                                                                                                                       UJ
                                                                                                                       in
                  I?


                  II"
II
n
                                                                                                            3   S
                                                                                                                            «
                                                                                                                11
                                                                                                                i   I   *  i
                                                                                                    -=.
                                                                                                                       .u
                                                                                                                        I   I  i.
                                                                                                                     i
                                                                                                                     i
                                                              3
                                                               s
                           IT
                           Q.
                     8
I

-------
           (A
   £
   CO
   UJ

   O
   UJ
   tt
   UJ
   o

   < UJ

   fcfc
   53 UJ   w «
   M 2   £ 5$
   < Of   ® S.

   -,/ ,'
,:,., •£-','-
.', : *.:,'• '
'Vgi£'."
•"*i;-f'-<
I c § c
§ §1
.E'l^B^1'.
f'
•E':
o
I,
0)
c , .
&
i
• s-
8 £•§
515
a 3 §
HI

S
1
**•
1.
£
!
s
:1
S:
i.

„. £
•i
;s
, i*
o
s"
,2
,o
£
$
o
S
1
i
CO
CO
•«r
N.
CM
:, a>
0
o
o
o
p
o
m

;$
OJ
t^
T.
o
"••o
in
m
CM
CO
-
<
o
_










'• ^_.








5
o
o
CO
S
8.
CO
n
o
0
•o'
CO
in
co

iR
i*.
T—
o
o
CO
in
o
2
h~
5
<
<
i
I
i
ai
S
<
i
«*—
n—

0
&
to
O
M—
»«—
1
QJ
*•—
1
M—
CD
Maricopa
§
CO
N-
O5
IO
CO
m
in
S
O,"
0
§
o
•*

S
OJ
0
o
0
o
o
0
1
S
5
1
m
co
r-
X
•g
X
•*
: K
' to
,«N
X
i

tt>
T^'
'o-
co
T-
o
T-
CNI
CM
X
S
X
N.
V-
in
CM
o
CO
5
S
a>
a>
^~
T—
O
.fe
o
co
in
o
o
o
8
•^

^
S
CO
CM
0
•T"
g
O
o
V-
S
T~
§
*
8




















a:
z
&












,. -


-"




a:
z
UJ
Q

CM
in

10
*e—




0
S

:,"0,
«y
i^-
0
CM




0
?
8
g
o
CO
IO
CM
T—
l>-
m
CM
o
_Q-~
O
in

•'N.-.
;o«;
:,|:
o
CM
O-
J-
cv
o
o
CO
^
i
<
CD
S
co
CM
O
O:
0
O
S
t*~ '• "~y
*:CV
o
b-

^t;
1, «M:-
o
O
cq
o
o
,_
CO
CO
T—
DC
Tf
1^
co
CM
, .0'
CM
r-
"70
-"o
o
CM

'_c*.
CM
CM
,_
' 'p
O
0
o
CO
CO
Q
TT
CO
CO
CO
CO
p
CO.
. CM
O
co
CO
- o
""•o
IO
CM
O
5

.;!o
CM
in
in
CM
"0
1
,_
CM
CD
CO
O
CM
_J

-------
ui  2

ui  c
-J *3
ffi  C
s *
*!.
S
§
P2
Assistance
Add to
Mailing List
General
'-, 5CAA ',• '
Information
'j£;'
"I
Financial/
Funding
Informatio
-. ;h:.. '•"
Recordkeepin
g
Monitoring
Compliance/
Regulatory
Information

S
!:
s-
!
E
f
S
*
:&-.
E
*
o
,s;'
i
•- S
5
S.
2
o
S
3
s
!
I
35






-:;'












(£.
Z
in
O>
in
5!
at
0
1
0
o
.p.
'; b
o
8
•p.-
f
0
o
o
o
o
o
10
O5
to
o
m
<
S
•t
s
in
S';
10
OO
9
CO
CO
o
'!'
to
OO
s
•;.sr
,'•'"«'
-• -l«~
to
o
§
o>
•«•
CM
OO
CO
co
00
§
g
V-
s
&
CN
8
in
10 '
«j
CM
CM
CN
(^
CM
••Q-;
0
o
OO
in
;i"
'.'••&
8
it
0,
s
o
o
in
m
g
CM
X.



•• :



',:''











&.
B
1
Eo
in
3
CN
O
O
CO
O
0
§
0
o
. O)
.' "^\
8
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
f-
co
CM
<
in
CM
in
co
o
CM
^-
m
?
^"
co
CO
CO
s
g
, CM
V
O.
0
o
0
CM
1
0
o
o
g
CM
O
g
CN
g
Tt"
S
CM
LU
CO
O)
CO
Oi~_
o;:
0
0
p;-
' o-
0
o
,8
o
co
o
0
co
o
o
s
CO
Q
s
o
?
g
CM
••'•
CM
0
0
I
1
<
s
i
'•«
eo,
CO
0
o
:'.O "
"O
o
g
;-"O/
•CM'
LS.
O
0
o
o
o
o
o
'S
o
I
CO
CO
CO
N.
CM
•«•
T*
CO
00
CO
^
CM
.w
CO
a>
CO
CO
CM
."•
:eo
g
r-
CO
in
i>-
•<*•
•»
TT
CO
ir>
en
CM
in
in
CM
Z
2
in
TT
in
S
0
o
in
o
to
o
o
1
§
o
«o
o
o
V
o
m
in
S
o
o
•")•
(fi
in
1
§
CO
ea
N.
§
0
o
o
o
o
1
;£
CM
S
s
CM
-eb.'
;-*
. 10
,co
?
o
g
00
h-
tn
O
CO
CO
s
CM
N.
,_
CM
0
CM
0
JI
^_
CM
«a-
^
o
t—
o
<•
CO
•*
T-
E



. »j















o:
uj
z
CO
co
r*.
S
CM
'0
o'
o
v-
o;
CO'
s
00
Stv.
-,-eb
: -5J-
0
o
in
-o-
T-
o
'.S1
^>
CN
>
<
£
'•ic
_.-*.*.
X
X
l'-.';';
• . '-^
: " ' X."'

X
''<• 5^^
/\
'V " ~
'"X


" ',x
X-


X
X
I
!•-
CM
O>








-;•.--'.
^ •-, ;








—3

-------
UJ  g

UJ  C
—i *;
m  c
-I
« 5
o 1
''"I

S
0
S
~I
Q. *
in
$
**
a
!'•
•o.S
^•"5
s: •
til
So!
° e
O)
j .,-g. .
..*,
Ts ? ^
•«5 g
llic
= £ =
e
• a, -
I
E
o
£ a
i
|
8*§
Ilf
a a E
can
S«i

vZ.
1
>*

•S
's-.
'*
-.O-
s'
>
£
;1
:s<~
f
•'s.
1
E
•S
s
2
o
s
§
i
S
o
CO
CO

o
o
o
0
, 0
o
o
,_
"'O-
to
o
o
o
0
o
co
o
CD
CM
2
CO
o
s
T—

CO
h-
co
IV.
co
CM
CO
o
o
o
CO1
8
8
,CM
0
1
o
co
o
o
o
i
*
#
o
g
a>

o
o
2
o
i
i
<
3?
o
r
JC-
_o>
i
1
o
n
CO
!c
o
1
.n
§
O
o
s
o
o



X

>c.
' -ie

X
- ."X.
: x


x •
, x-
X
X
X
X
Q








,,


- ;'--'•
-";;'


', •>




i
O
to
*—
T™
S

O,
O
O
T-
'• 0,
*>
0
CM
O-.
,o.
.8-
o
CM
O
in
o
0
in
t—
in
CM
CM
*
O
PI
CO
CO
CM
a>

o
0
r—
in
CO
0
o.
. o
o
,_
0
00
0
CM
O
fe
CO
o
§
Tt
to
5
OL
O
h-
CM
CM
N.
co
CO

CO
o
CO
CM
in
CO
to.
o
CM
/
• ',

^
0
o
o
o
b
ir>
O
o-
CO
. o
10
o
in
o
o
o
o
o
§
5
O
CO




















cc.
Z
Q
CO
s
CM
CO
CO

0
O
CO
co
CM
:•; cv:
, .•«
0
§
: «t'
CM;
CO
,o>
S
0
o
o
w
o
o
5r
o
CO
Z
§
TT
CM
CO
•f
T—
CM
§

^
oo
CO
o
•' -o_
p^
o
8
'•'0;'
-o;
o
•»
CM
O
0
o
0
I
ci
p
CO
CM
'•/ '
oo--.
, T-~
o
^~
o""
'o-.
CM
S
X
;•;' o*':
' fc
^t
0
o
o
o
o
0
s
1-
i
o
•*

',>^-
•••^-':
m
co
o
•,;,-p_
.'::0";
O
O
•. "Ki;
£,;£*-;
k'.'C
! «'
«
O
' S'
T"
in
^
•^'
&
'•»—
ca
£
CO
r«-
co
CM

' ,W"
,g
CM
,_
**•*-
'•"*.
•*
co
CO
J'cvi;.
'• -**",
CO
CM
v-
m
o
;
o
CO
fc
CO
03
^
O
CO
o
in

o
0
o
co
o
i:'s-
CO
o
o
a>
''"P-
"!in
i^
o
m
,o
o
0
o
0
,8
>

-------
111  C
J *5
ffi  C
<  o
          *.
           s
           e
        ;T>.£*
          .-
         '  •
          -'
          ' O ,'-
          :«•/
          DC. W
Iff
"5. "5 §
m
                     CM
                     CN

                 §
                        O
                        co
                        CO
                           8
                    g
                              CO

                              o
                  0?


                              S.
        5
        O

                      O)
                      tM
                                   g
                                   8
                                   to
                                   s
                                  = 3
                                  2
                                  o

-------
  (0
  UJ
jt
ag
  o
  3
        M-"
        m fi».
        °!
      rim
°-Z.

        to
         1 3 «
         I O
      £ C S"S
      • H *
      us" -g
                                                                   o
                                                                   z
                                       a:
                     (0
                     Q.
                             8
                            LJ
                            Q
                                                    CO
                                                               O
                                                                   o
                                                                   <
                                                                   Z

-------
UJ  3
uj .E
i ; : i
«-l §
iff «t
S 3. »
, ,. A °
i§
:|j;
''• If
ii*
sjf =

ntoa o
-. , o -, , *-

Hfi
CO
*— *^
III!
Review
documents
for
readability or
content
1
55


















z
3


X


X



X







X

111


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
0


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
2


X














X

i


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
z





X
X

X








X
X
w


















z
o


X


X
X


X









1-


X


X


X








X

UJ


X


X


X










*





X
X

X
X







X

I
z


















cc
*


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
5


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
*


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
o


X














X

D


X


X
X

X
X




X


X
X
o


X


X


X
X









o

-------
O ~
1U  3
uj .£
JS
O
i_l 1
|i|i
;8|*
'. 0. 33
Si
« * «
c c
"§"
— o g
>-*« - •* CO
llflf
o°w g
jfjfj
sfl t
ill!
sgf«
(0
ffll
si js
•D S
3
CO



X
X







X

X





X

o:
o












X









2



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

as



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

E







X




X

X




X


0
CO



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

b
CO



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

z
X











X






X


g



X








X









H-



X








X






X


1-












X









5



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

*



X
X


X








X


X


1



X
X


X




X

X

X


X
X

*
X





















i



X








X

X





X

*
                                                                                                                                       CO
                                                                                                                                       £
                                                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                                                       2    !
                                                                                                                                       ~    C
                                                                                                                                       ^3   'C
                                                                                                                                  c
                                                                                                                                  03
                                                                                                                                  (A
                                                                                                                                  0)
                                                                                                                                       •O   T3

                                                                                                                                       CD   Q.


                                                                                                                                       I   5

-------
UJ
UJ  C
-J  r*
'siting appointments.
l
CD
s
o>







8
§
^
1
Q_
S
TO
.2
S1
£
§

-------
(0
UJ
(0
(0
Ul
z
(0

CD
.
O
£8
(0
(O
o

_l
o
5
- 2j
It.
,-.-,


1
;|
e
u.
0
u
z







Ul
g
^%
.
^J
^^


111
o

2

?3
DC
o
i
0.


































|| Alabama


































5
CO
JO


































1 Arizona





























co
§•
u
•c
co


'£







c
if
§
01
-5
>
(5
CO
CO
CD
'55
3
m
"5
CO



CO
O)
O3









|| Arkansas

Ilion/year
'£
S





'c
s
o
CO
_CB
Technolog
._
<
CD
CD
O
CD
>
1
O
_c

in
en

"»
o>
u
c
55


illion/year
E
in
CN

1
"E
co
2
CL
1
"c
o
placement 1
®
cc
D
Q
X
CD

O
CO
o

oo
O)
O5
^^
CD
0
c
CO

o
8
o
o"
in
O
o
o
o"



CD
Ci
1
o
13
1 Financing
o
t.
o
O
_o
— J
"o
CL
6

CM

O)
"»
9
U
c
CO






CO
£
co
O


































|| Colorado
































t .
!3
|| Connectici


































|| Delaware


































S District of
Columbia


































CO
p
o
U-


































co
1
O


































'S
1


































o
CO
2


































CO
"o


































co
co
_c


































CO


































II
|| Kansas

-------
 I   ffi
Ul  3
LU.E
-J "£
i
Ul
0
^Zt
Q
u.







I
»
U.
O
ui














Ul
ml
i
<
£
i
I PROGRAM



































1 Kentucky



































II Jefferson Cty



































|| Louisiana



































CD
'5
§
o
o"
If)
&







73
C
LL
§
°
CD
O
.2
"a
o
0
22
o
:c

"o
Q.
CO
CO
CD
r";
"S
3
CD
"re
E
CO


c
ct

•o
n
£
a



































|| Massachusetts



































ct
Z
if
o
o
o
o"
m
r^
V*

E
E
en
2
a.
c
CD
O
1
1
2
a
E
S
c
o
s
o
U.
"^
£
UJ
CO
CO
CD
c
'53
3
CO
"55
E
CO


h-
ro
N-

|| Minnesota



































II Mississippi



































II Missouri



































II Montana



































II Nebraska



































|| 	
II Nevada



































£
\
cc
3



































a
S2
_a
1



































c
"5
a
|



































J^
l_
1



































II North Carolina



































a
'c
0
x:
c
Z

-------
111
LLJ.E
Ul
i
a
u.









-9
' GRANT/LOAJ
u.
0
Ul
1










Ul
<
1
<
Q
S
1 PROGRA

market











I
J
O
"3
lopment A
0
>
0
Q
75

6
•—
^
X
o


in


L_
CO
CD
0
o
0
0
in











"c
2
T3
C
U.
0
u
£
%
CO
CO
CO
CD
c
'55
m
_^
"ca

CO


un
c»



o
6































|| Oklahoma































o
I

_o
I
m
csi









^^
r-
e Account (loar
Assistanc
c
_g
I
fc_
Q.
O

J5
"o
Q.


05
^


o
I












"c
E
O
CD
E
CO
CO
CD
CO
CO
^

C3>
^


| Pennsylvania































8
a:
CD































|| Rhode Island






























CO
|| South Carolin































|| South Dakota































|| Tennessee































CO
CO
X
1-































CO
5































|| Vermont

.0
I
in
co

T5
c
u.
CD
0
c
£
"co
"co
CO
CD
0
CO
"5.
1
ronmental
•>
c
UJ
CO
CO
CD
c
'co
CO
__ ^^
CO zi
SCO
o



o
0



.£5
c
1































|| Virgin Islands































|| Washington

o
8
o"
1





CO

CO
1)
1

Loan Program
ronmental
•>
c
UJ
CO
CO
CD
C
"55
CD
.^
75
E
CO

co
cr>
•6
'£


§
o
o"
m
€/}






u
CO
E


Loan Program
ronmental
•>
c
UJ
CO
CO
CD
c
'co
m
__. .
"CD

CO

CO

1


co
'JE
~tn
1































|| Wisconsin































c
1
5
                                                                                                                                            CO

-------
UJ 3
ui.£

-------
CD
CO
CO
1
0
$
iZ
C
c
o
CD
Q.

C
"S3
'x
CD
O)
C
0
CO
TABLE E-12
OPERATIVE EFFORTS
developed cooperative efforts
X OT
O to
OJC
a.
o
m
c/>
CD
?
^-*
each compone
-12.
5 III
£  «| c
^\ C ® *r^ Q* n» CO
^'55 ~ .E o ^ 55
o-Q co go £ >;
lite'^l'l®
^ co O. £ co CO £


CQ
« _-
Partner with the Department of Economic
Development, the SBDC, AR Environmenl
Federation, AR Manufacturers Associatior
other trade associations on training and
compliance assistance efforts.



•ri
8
CO
•Q.
a>
c

I
1
) has retired and has
m
CO

CO
CO
CO
CO
1














<
Z


s£
5 8 "I
Each of CA's 35 Air Pollution Control and /
Quality Management Districts, the ARB
Ombudsman, the Cal/EPA permit assistan
centers, the SBA, and many chambers of
commerce work together to provide busine
with the knowledge and tools needed to cc



.2 So
H -3
'c"8 c<
io-ife
'"ilP
•5 g co-o
= 0 
£.
co"c
other agencies that serve small businesse
'eral industries to create understandable a
£ %
•^j CO
> .c
•s-|
CO CD
tnSi
Is
o CL
II .
o>aa
>ugh the million dollar
i, SBDC, banking inst
ul guidance documer
j=£D ^
I-CO =

o
«
o
8














£
Z




£








£
Z

1
»
c
8














cc
z




SBO has dual rule as SBAP.



?I!
co g co
2S »>
= '3>
CO co co
_ J- CO
C CD ^-
So10
O) . (U
n information exchan
ir sections of DNREC
tionship with other agi
nesses.
Q..C — '"
oo sE

CD
co
Q

•5
<

-------
ui.£
Jle
2°
5 Si
       ffi
              c
              o
              •
o distribute in
inspect
nesses.
Work wi
small b
              CO
              g
              I
              re
              £
-2* CO


Ss
co o

i§"
— 
S.9>
              "5-2
              QO
en
S
SB
                        CO
                        '
          CD
                  5 ^j- i" co
                  go gm
                  I S 2.21
                  frnffll

                  ill!
                  o§^<
                  Q»cc5
                  JliS .
                  J^ ^3 ^- f (—
                  f Sfiil
                  ?5I§S
                  .5-oW c w
                  !f«l2
                  •lislS
                  Twmoro
                                  w  -s
2                                     (A
                                  ^  <«
                                  S  CO
                     isis
me
eme
alth Admi
edia cov
ithin regul
ssistanc
im
wit
A
5=^

?l-i|8
P co co 3 co c
3 C C = t5 .5
"a  3
O ^ i** —i  w
o ojO-o'S cl
»-5»-£§i
•o-5c£p£p
o S o •>  Q.JS
f CUSUJ O CO
•S >.£Z aJ-5
S .•£• ® c >
o)= E 0,2
X^ 3 ^  Q
•- c o °) " •
|lll<
SSS-Ss
                
-------
UJ

UJ.
         si
          I
                                        1JLI1-!
                                        •= -5 U rn & 3
                                        C 3 co WC/J —
                                        => S> -ir"5
                                        co-co^^S-y

                                        lasi4*,*
             *B3(i'|^
             ilifiliiiliili
             coSmtQ cJS2- £ 5>-6
             co «5 £co co co-o^< co

pl?^!^^
^lfl«Q^

•sJUi\28.s ~ ;=•(» | co
 S.e^9a: 50:
.s=9cBa^c?-iQ
§111
                                         I
                                                     &
                                                     o

                                                     1
                                                     8
                                                     §
                                                     I
                                                              _g

                                                              "3
                      2
                      i-
             - S. * Jo .9

            i^ii
            S col- 2 >
            H^ . ^ £
            gSs-20-
            -2 o>-c co c
            = = "S 8 =
            > «-S ^ =
            1EH^
            n-^-ocS0-
            c~ c >->


            itill
                                                        c  t
                                                                           co
                                                              coco
                      1
                      CD
                      ;s

                      o

-------
uu.E












CO
RIEF DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATIVE EFFORT
m











a
o





O.
CO




;-
S
CO
K>

UJK
t? Of
f £
h-










^
z
*—
SBAP works with the staff from the DEP's Office c
Innovation and Assistance and other bureaus to
assist in some program functions. SBAP also
works closely with the SBO and business groups
named under SBO.

.52 -o
0 C
eo-o ro
*!!!

SBO works closely with SBAP ant
business service providers such a
Department of Economic and Con
Development, the ME Chamber a
Alliance, ME DBDC, ME MEP, ME
Association, ME Wood Products /
other business groups to maximiz
effectiveness.




1
s










^
z

SBAP works with the media administrations to
reach small businesses. ARMA has 2 engineers
who provide permitting services to small
businesses. SBAP works closely with the P2
program on outreach activities. Input from other
administrations is used to determine sectors to
target for assistance. Two engineers in the
Environmental Permits Center answer permitting
questions from small and large businesses.





z


-Q
C
JO
to










£.
Z
c
OTA works with the enforcement agencies to
provide general information about trends we see i
the field.





QL
Z
a>
en
I
u
i
i
c
(0
o
m
to
_(0
5

-------
m
ai .E
-J"e















CO
IEF DESCRIPTION OF COOPERATIVE EFFORT
tt
m








^
2







a.
m
CO


8
CO
si
-§ o)**
.2 •§ § •> •§
^3 P O).c~ 5
§-=E>-a5g
^•S'g-g.--
wggijg^tS
Jiplii
>> » £ ™ «
w "(5 0) O S (A
Q ^ E ^o "H ®
§03 §,£'§.2
"^ 2 S^ B^
Illlill

SBAP works closely with the CAP, supplying
information as required. SBAP works with the
department's regulatory programs to obtain
expertise in specific areas when needed. SBAP
also partners with the SBDCs and other
assistance providers to reach MO's businesses.


SBAP supplies technical assistance as needed to
the SBO.


1
a>
2

to
£
o>
Q
Q.
i:
O
£
1
2
JB

^
g
•«

•z.


Cooperated with the MSU Extension Service P2
Program in providing P2 services to clients and
developing printed materials. Partnered with
SBDC to offer loans for energy conservation and
P2.

co
c
aj
0




















SBO, SBAP, and CAP are all run by the same per

cc
V.
cc
1

                                                                                                                ®
                                                                                                                A
                                                                                                                .1
                                                                                                                <
                                                                                                                z

-------
UJ
  S
      DC
      u
      CO
      g
      u.
      UJ
      0£
      m
       si
             £
            s 8 §3 §8
              SS
           51111111
for
n sta
tes e
ram
lients
rral n
ts to
th the
nce
with l
state
l assi
ith th
pertise of Division
. SBAP coordinat
vironmental Progr
tion and inform cli
r services. A refer
d that sends client
. SBAP works wit
business assistan
tion also occurs w
ent authorities by
ding the tec
BAP inte
gic issues.
utilizes the exp
al information.
e Business Env
inate informati
ops and other
en established
al assistance.
ashoe County b
ms. Coordinati
mic developme
gencies, includi
er, the BEP. S
unicate strategi
P
nic
the
mi
sh
and Was
program
economi
local ag
provider
mu
           5
           §
           _CB
                          I
CO
.2 c
"I
co <2
CD iS
Jo
C
E
"
                             ?
                             co_.
                           y  16-
                           3  C]
                           O  Q ,
                           
                          «i*.U
                          E
Administrative support fro
Division. Continued to exp
relationships with other lo
national aates for en
legislative, business
c
and
 £

 CO
       O
       m
       co
       •o
       c
       CD
       8=
       S
       en
       en
       CD
       it
                                 $   S
                                 ts  i- *
                                 ? en £.g

                                 INS
                                 §|iH
                                 a. Q.-S5 2 °>
                                 <• CM cnu- ccO
                                 mo.S CD EQ
                                 "liliS
                                 ^™£.2.i2
                                 oi>-iS5^
e
ni
A
rk
an
SBAP acts as staff to th
with Air Permit, Air Plan
within DEP. Coordinates
Technology's Technical
P2. P and SBO
and e association
               £
               jg

               '§
               £5.
               .»
               a?
              O
i*
ii
               fc8«|S>la5-||l^
               Q.m.gi|a)§Q.eiiJE« .
               llll!l||l|ll
               |l§51lb|lelf
               i»-illi;iflll
               £{iiyf3£ifs
               illlllllllsl
                                         X
                                         CD
                                                              CO

-------


















Ill 3
UJ.E
s!




























P
tr
IEF DESCRIPTION QF COOPERATIVE EFFO
Q£
ID









CL

o









m
to




8
CO
>
gQ£
Q
LJH
5«5
w2i

CD
CO
>,
1

<5 '* >>
£ 'c to
SBAP co-sponsors technical workshops with o
technical assistance providers, including local
agencies, trade groups and associations, and
DEC'S Pollution Prevention Unit to leverage
outreach to industry sectors and to avoid
duplication of effort. SBAP utilizes DEC'S tech
staff to review fact sheets and articles for the
SBAP's technical newsletter. SBAP also regul
invites equipment vendors and representatives
from companies that develop technologies to
provide in-house technical workshops for staff.
SBAP always invites DEC'S technical staff and
other representatives of state agencies so the\
might share the learning experience.


.« 1C HI
£oJ;^.O 	 £CQ.
On compliance assistance outreach efforts,
SBEO partnered with trade associations, su
the Master Association of Metal Finishers, t
Environmental Business Association of Nev
State, the Neighborhood Cleaners Associat
International, the Korean Dry Cleaners
Association, and the Flexographic Technics
Association. SBEO works collaboratively w
SBAP, the DEC Pollution Prevention Unit, a
NYC DEP Environmental Economic Develo
Assistance Unit.



.£
p
5
Z














OL
Z


K.


-•£§5 E .g

We work cooperatively with the Division of /
Quality on a near weekly basis. We also wi
closely with the Division of Pollution Preven
and the NC Industrial Extension Office. Mo
this cooperation is accomplished through
individual contacts. We see some results fr
serving on Department-wide teams. We
cooperate with the SBTCP and small busini
centers in the community college.
co

'Q
CO
O
£
1


^
c~ 03

il

CO 0

"1.1
S7S
E'o
< S«
0 co


SBAP works with trade associations, other stal
agencies, and other organizations to get
information to affected businesses.



-------
Ul 3
uj.E
-"•£
II

            C CD
            •ffii
            c.~

            II
            .iS
             s
            « =
            .£  o 9 Q.O £ uj O co co o ai
            P
            n >;£  ~  ~
            ii;§fisl§2=llll
            5>£i8<2~cp_o P •£
                          3 t-^0
                          XI-D 3
                          ^ £ O3
                          CO CO  O>(D
                                         «=£
                                         |go
                                         ."= £10
                                         l-^l
                                         co-o o
                                         J§5
                                        sill
                                                 ss!
CO
I
I
                                                       K.
he
8
ir
€
CD
                         I
                             gl
                             H
                             "££
                             CJ«
                          •E 1"
                          ass'S'
                          S °>c co gj oj
                          O O CD O CD Q]
                          •2^ 11^ i

                          i|!&
                          CO §UJO~-g
                          ff-fssia
                          lcll=8
                          ^§ ®°DT3
                          co ~ E »>.,•>
                          uj =r^<|
                           7S §3
                          ^Ipo

                          S^fi
                          81115.0:
.5
_co
J2
CD
E
                                                               00

-------
uj.E
-1 e
  o
      J2
      •;,E
      O
E
PERA
         m
        tft
            •§
            co
            CO
            §
            CO
f in
ing
    !.ill
al staf
rmitti
uter
gible s
provi
uestio
tting i
f
sored
ss to te
o assist
ovides
charge to
m areas a
ith technic
tings on pe
egula
in S
r ac
ality t
lso pr
at no
progra
sist wi
meeti
R
s ular
o Qu
Quality al
eling
ther p
to ass
te in
esse
pea
reg
f Air
ualit
odeli
ses. Oth
mbers to
articipate
all busine
ated as sp
ps.
e
p
ma
ipa
ho
the
iss
dis
busine
staff m
and to
with s
partici
works
e
cil
si
                 CD

                l!s«
                CO O O w- '-t
                >e Si- 
                                               Sa^l^«^£
                                               ocjggggcs
                                               jsi^si
                                               lfn-^^-lsl
                     CO
                     5
                                                          CO

                                                          CO
                                < v
                                m^=
                                w|
                                -ot
                                c5.2>
                                   cl
                                              55»- —S
                                              E OQ w

                                              .IP1.
                                              stlil
                                              ^llc!!
No SBO.
O

I
                                                                     i

-------
43
UI.E
          CO
         yt
             £
             5
             o
             T3
             C
             CD


             I
             g
             O)
             CD
             T3
             CO
ely
Ps,
ciation,
d many
d CAP, the SBAP acti
and credibility of the
other state SBOs/SBA
he VA Manufacturing
VA Chamber of
lpott Manufacturing
he VA Environmental
PA Region III Busines
A Chamber of
ufacturers A
ion Program,
f th
the
gani
C n
Ce
, the
artn
oun
Cen
, the
tion
,
P
nce
ce,
,
lu
On
tries se t
follo or
the VA SBD
Technology
Commerce,
Extension
Busine
Assista
Comm
DEQ's
others.
             1
               -
             c a.
             co
. 5 CD
Sssl
                                                  gf-S-8
                                                  ou
-------
UJ 3

uj.E
       I
       £
       8
       te.
       oo
         CD
         OX
        88
         1
                1   IE-I
                ^^ d = 2£-
                 •o
                 c
                 CO
            •o 55 £  ~ ~ ®


            Mil* °~
            Q. « 3 to (D
5 c2

 •-Q

5^00-
™"S<


III




l|l

i||
•S o S
^o-sisg
•C 3 -C Q. OL^



llll'A
?lSill

               S '= •« 01.9), 

                        Ilii

               fiisllslaSlll
              — 5~oc-cciRS2i-Q
-------
            -o—.c-
            •*•->:«
            3(
            tat
 (A
0.

O


ffi



O


O


<
   5
   O
           '
t         '
CD 5
                   ES
                    •' 4&
   o
   u.
   
-------
CO  ~?
T-  ^
 I  ffi
1U  3

LLJ.E
»
. • -C * ,
o
•25; =
i&ii
,-o Q"%£
"§«&£"
 3
i^ ill
e*¥§§o
||ll|£
O'S a
u ^
a. „,-
a -2
l»||f
§~ « C^i3
o olS <3 jf
c Q.
£
2
O)
s
a.





X



X

X

X



X



X



>






X





X

X



X



X


^
o
a>
— 5





X



X

X

X

X

X



X



_l






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



111










X

X

X



X



X



a






















a:



i






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



I


X



X



X

X

X

X

X



X



z










X



X

X

X



X



CO






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



o






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



H-






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



LU






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



%






*



X

X

X

X

X



X



X
z






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



— 5










X

X

X

X

X



X



z






X



X

X

X

X

X



X



z






X



X

X

X



X



X



0

                                                                                                                                       2
                                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                                       z
                                                                                                                                       a:
                                                                                                                                       g
                                                                                                                                       to
                                                                                                                                       o

-------
 i  0)
LU  3
UI.E
0>
•G* ,
O
O*i C
**> m
0 O £ £
fo"|J2
"§«a E:"
c0«>o
c: a

iwi
• £ « "
•> § £-5 5> "£'
0°
•o
^ 2~<
'5 C t3 ft
«Ula o£'
Network through
state/ regional air
group meetings such
asWESTAR
(Western States Air
Resources)
•o <
c£ a.
ro2'5fi§ c
»j * "c 5 — "5
» e 8m e *
1^ |
_&^ |
|si>»
llflll
111 If
c a.
E
m
£
O)
2
0.

X








X

X



X
X


X




X




Q






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




0











X

X



X
X


X




X




o











X






X


X




X




a:
o






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




2






X










X



X




X




a:
a.











X

X



X
X


X




X




5






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




o
CO











X





X
X


X




X




a






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




z






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




X






X




X

X



X
X







X




1-











X

X



X



X




X




£


X



X




X

X



X
X


X




X




>

















X



X




X




>

















X
X


X




X




1


X



X




X

X



X



X




X




i






X




X

X



X
X


X




X




i

                                                                                                                               CO
                                                                                                                                 s
                                                                                                                                 i
                                                                                                                                 IT
                                                                                                                                 z

-------
uj.E
-1 P
2 o
^ o
         o

         §•'
       •J8o-fl'S

       W CO O
      .5 -3 S.
      irif
       o
       •o
           <
f*^l
s'w w 5 «>«
 •o^.

 «f

«lig
      i I
      lill
         "
1
kiu
_c

t£ =
!f°
• ± 01

        A C~
      III I1-
       o
     2
     ra
     p
                                                        z
                                                        (E
                                                              Z

                                                              <

-------
 i   a)
IU  3

LU .E

-I t

3  O
^ o
                                  JS
                  CO
                  o

                  I
                  I
                  o
                  o
                 .2

                 i

                  o
                 o
      I
      I
      £
      §
      o
      Q.
      <
                  o
                 a:
                 CN
                 a.

                  a>
                  a>
                             cc   JB
ne
      E


      o
      O

      O)
                  o>   CQ

                 €    »
                  o
                  CD
      O
      m
co

a.
<
CD
CO

"co

o
                       CO    _
Si    —   -5
co    2i

fc    »
~    CO

      o
                       CO

                       o

                       lo
                       c

                       •o

                       a>
                       33
S

5
CD
CO

0)


'5
u
0}
tr
                                   CO
CD

CO

O
CD

CO
            ID


            O
           Q
           z
                                                                                                                                    in

-------
CO
g
CO

I
coi-
Zll.
go

13
CO
Jf
: Il-sl
^"Hs
_ fl*  ^ Q *••
l^o-H o
It
«§E
588
CC-o
O.
||||
4) O*A O
5!°"
5
OJ
8
Q.













o:
z


,














z


3


X


X
X










a

X
X


X
X










co
Q.
o
o
CO
^





X










££




X'
X
X










s


X

X
X
X


X




X


o
O














K.
Z


^














Qi
Z


LU
Q


X






X




X


O
Q

X
X

X
X
X


X







LJL


X


X
X


X




X


s


X


X
X










I


X


X
X


X




X


Q


X

X
X
X


X







d


X

X
X
X


X




X


z


X

X
X
X


X




X


<






X


X




X


s

                                                                                       o
                                                                                       z
                                                                                       ce
                                                                                       <
                                                                                       z

-------
-
m §

^ o
§£f
a-.'- -.
Po|
jfrv'S'S
g O Q.3
S.2-I
o
£*^— j<8
£ "*.fl c S
5 wjg ws:
^ o±f «8 a.
fgE||
Simplified/
consolidated
permits
and/or forms
nil
; "• -c_g
O.g
*°]I—

Ji-E'
® 0 0
a.
ilfi
a;""
£
a>
o
a.
X


X





X

X


X



X

5





















fferson









CCL
Z

I




X





X
X
X


X



X

z










X








X

CO




X





X
X
X


X



X

o




X







X


X



X

1-




X





X
X
X


X



X

UJ




X






X
X


X



X

^




X





X
X
X


X



X

X




X





X
X
X


X



X

—3




X





X
X
X


X



X

z











X
X


X





>

X


X





X
X
X








o


-------
LU .E
..;W
te
« 0 Q.3
fl»0"2*c
a*7: "~
O
5 g^l
l|*ft
' -,v «o
iff!
nli
too c
O „ !«
Jill
••••Ilfi
, /w fc"O;'J»
evlew SBTCP
ocumehts for
compliance
nc-o
a.
*~5 § w
till
IK""
E
TO
O>
2
Q.

X



X
X



X
X



X



Q
Z
















Z



o


X



X
X



X




X



O

X
X



X
X



X




X



a:
o







X



X
X







a:
















a:
z



a:
a.


X








X
X



X



E


X




X



X
X



X



o
03







X



X
X







a


X



X
X



X
X



X



z

X
X



X
X



X
X



X



£


X



X
X



X
X



X



1-


X








X
X



X



£

X
X



X
X



X
X







£


X




X




X







*






X
X




X



X



1


X



X
X



X








i






X
X



X
X







I

                                                                                                                       co
                                                                                                                        rr
                                                                                                                        z

-------


ABLE E-14
Continued)
^ ^
t ^"^










> IsS
6^1
• '••&••'• J-:
§fs«
5f|l
£°o%2
, fc w >fO
: 1^^
o -,- •
Eliminate
unnecessary
permits by ;
increasing
exemptions
•-"§ 1
Jl|f
mil
: ' • "tiv?
'• ". :::/£&
, •• cs:
~ • '• o ts
^SSico
,>s:8-tr
I pi
, . O ^ n»< ,
(£ Q-g 0
. Tr^jBjsr
. ,' i" :"~" ,fl>- *
fcviewSBTCP
iocuments for
compliance
U. w
Q.
O C_
&§fs
?I1I
•2 -So I
gl°m
&


E
2
, o>
g
£







X















O)
c
'§•
CD
^
• calendars for record
nd Notes:
Distributed dry cleaner
co
CO

o
«=
"
<
1
P nl







CO
&
a
Training provided by A





^








_:
'CD
CD
CO
'>
c
-£
CO
1



CD
CL
O
o
CO







-stop assistance.
CD
o
•a
co
E
1
i.





o


certain criteria.
O)
c
~®
tn
•ogram for businessei
5.
>
_CD
rEE
S.
I
2





a:
o







summary documents
•o
CD
?
O
"5,
CO
CD
CD
CD"
CO
'o
<§





e





cz
o
electronic transmissi
Duplex printing, use of





3








•D
CD
CD
"5
5*
"o
CL
$





>

-------
  (0
  z
  o
  (0


  1
  D.|_
  UJO
  z-

^i
TJsu.
UJllJ>-
UJXQf
  m
  (O
^
r o§
2.
Amnesty program
;,W;C..2r
i» oo
t. ••• '
o
;-

-------
UJ
uj.E
fel
or
«
o>
..' 1

•- • :'•"».."
' I
: fe'fe- ',
Review SBTC
documents f
compliance
jle review for
on small
nesses
v. o"Z5
O B 31 •
•S ^*-Q-<
—•" -
«.
0.
I
10 c
— "* at
~!<5 B
«»''c'^'
£ IB
3 O
10
C,
UJ
E
S
o>
o
v»
Q.




X




X







X





^
O






X



X
X







X






_1






X



X








X






LU



















OL
•z.






Q



















•z.






2



















o:
-z.






I






X



X
X







X






•z.






X



X
X














CO


X







X
X







X






0










X








X






h-










X
X







X






UJ
•z.






X



X
X







X






•z.






X



X








X






1.










X
X







X






-5










X
X







X






•z.



















X






•z.











X







X






o






X



X
X







X






D



















a:
•z.






X
o



-------
m  §
if
s|
o
52.
I
o»
o
fc.

w
I
0. «-
fli
HE
588
OS'S
i_
«"<5
••— er tn
>f 8
*§8
4-t>"«
||S
o ,
a.
10
ic
—5 w
i§.|
» = •-
2. as
3 O
(0
c
111
E
co
D)
£
a.







X








X






X







O








X



X




X






X







CH
O












X











X







a.
























z







o:
a.








X



X











X







E








X



X




X














o
CO












X




X






X







Q
CO

X






X








X






X







Z








X



X




X






X







£












X











X







t-












X




X






X







£












X




X






X







£












X











X







*












X




X






X







1












X




X






X







1












X











X







i

X






X























1


-------
10  ~f
T-  ^>
 *  to
in  3
ULJ  .E
•J  "£
2  o
^  o
                                  T3
                                  CD
                                  CO
                                  15

                                  .g
                                  to


CO
,
.2
o
Q.
"•5
CO
£
c
"o
>

<


>,
u
"o
Q.
=5
co
c
CO
CO
CO
X

CO
V
CO
CO
C£
O
<
S
T5
CD
T3
'>
2
Q.
O)
|E
£


£
s-
o
Q.
CD
£
*^-
111
C
0
(D
CO
co
a:
z
Q

O
CD
1
CO
•a
CD
CD
•Q
o
E
>,
o
"o
Q.
partment
CD
Q

•z.


-6
0
CD
I
"o
Q.
<
0

^


.0
TO
CO
'5i
_CD
+-•
'-a
(0
*L
CD
CO

>-

-------
  (0

  O
  w
   HI <

   EB
   LU
o
   -
   O 13
   u. a
   o "J
   H LU
   COX
   Z I-
   OLL
   FO
   O
   <
   a.
   o
   CO
fc-.fi
O a>
o
o
** nS ,
»! S
to > o
<3 .» *=
8~ W CO
. QJ ^^
•CMS
$ O 3
c w ®
p "
o It
•S *£
8-1 1
Slf
1ft
S_o S
^- iC* W
«  o o
o o o
2
• O)
S
Q.

















OH


_i


















o:


*











X









N





















CO
Q.
O
O
CO
^

















01


01

X



X





X









O











X






X


O
0


















01
Z


O


















en


HI
Q


















Z


0
Q

X









X






X


LL











X






X


O





X





X









I


















X


Q











X









J


















X


Z





X





X






X


<


















X


CO

X



















>

                                                                                           §.
                                                                                           CO
                                                                                           £
                                                                                           o

                                                                                           1

-------
?f
 O
O a>
8 ::' ,-
1o -o eo,
"35 * §
Iff'- •••r Ut
"5^ «
'O{ GO 2*%
J§ « \S
to. re
if
c o> **
15
•g ~~.-gs
fe,,E.^
w c S
§«g.
c '**
^ tO''' ID
Et> «
- ff 'Cr"
I 1
0. g
H "J 0
«° S —
5 po-
lls
2
0)
o
l_
Q.
















>
O





X





X





X
<

















X
u.

















o:
z
Q

















o:
z
<

















a:
z
I











X





X
Z





X





X





X
CO





X





X





X
o

















z
1-

















QL
Z
LLJ

















X
Z











X





X
X
Z





X





X





X
z

















Z
2











X






Z





X





X






O

















Z
Q

















£
X





X












O


                                          Cxi

-------
 i  
S-
8
c >,
m &
"S -o «
*m O C
to >5
• _ *c o
as ro «>
^ ?>•
^s ra w-
o a. IS
||I
3*"
IL.
10
08
§1
A 0
0-
5 "S
"to — s
C'fS
0) C '=>
|»§
5 « t
*•£ o
8"& Q-
« W «8
* c S
— 5 «
o> a c
j^«- - ^2
N'8
Sfi
III
2
o>
2
a.











X



















X

O


























X







<
































Z

Di
a.












X



















X

E


























X





X

O
CO
































X

Q
CO


























X





X

Z












X






X






X





X

X
































X

H-
































o:

5


























X





X

2


























X





X

*


























X





X

1












X






X






X







g


























X





X

i
































a:
z

^

                                                                                                         £
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         z
                                                                                                         or

-------
LU.E
-1 ^
2 o
^ o
          o
          §
      CO
T3

CO
in

.g

"o
T3
CD
CO
CO
.a
^
cz

1

o
o
•o
co
ca
a>
c
"35  .

-------
      APPENDIX F
PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

-------
CD
_Q
C
2
CD
CO
CO
CO
o
O)
CD
CO
CD
co jE
UJ H
O >,
UJ -•£
< •§
2 Q-
1 I
uj .2
uj •£
* E
3 CD
CO £
12 i>
")- S
— 1 Q .Q
<^H C
^f ^
H" C
CO
_l CO
< CO
O 0
o ra
s E
< 2
n? o
1 1
0. ^

D. —
O 0
S s-
W ^cji
oS
.E O)
o.|
"S o
CD =
w£
CO <])
CD *j^
3) c
CO C
fel
feo
CO Q.
||?
S&J
. - -
* c'sl) c
oJ5 mis 3'
aS-jgBE
E E*5 S?
"™**8 *" o
,-v : U



''r ^} ^» 3- m'^T

2 ^*p: w*1*
••~'2£ ^- ^'
81

"•55^^53
2w3c3s
£3 §21


	 O Q,
^
3
5 °—
aV^jj » o
| lie's
(0 S m*3»-Q
28-o = °
o c «
E
2
o>
o
ct






co



























CM







'r-



^











































a:



%







CM












CO


























5!







CM












CO






















<-


CO
Q.
O
_O
5














co




CM






















"-



<















































g






„
CM












T-














co











o
O











































z



t







co












CM






















'-



UJ
Q




















CM














CO











O
Q







CM







co



























"-



LL







CM












CO






















'-



0







CM












co






















--



i







CM












CO






















•^



Q







^~





















co













CM



_J







co












CM






















T—



z


I
<

-------
 _

UJ  C
-i ^
DQ  C
<  O
® 2 1
*5«l —
OJ5 a eo 3
feoJaE
If£?l
' »•„, or
lH
" c - -eov
UJ

fell'
- - : ^' ^£"S"
- ft* O "
^3 ^.
lift
-£||S
J^-B,
*l-5 ra
C 3
2

Q.










CM
CO




<




-







CO



CM

CO













CM


co

>-




CM











CO

o
1

—>


-






CO




CM

3



CO







CM




T-

UJ




co











T-

Q



T—
CM






CO






2




T-








CO


CM

I




co






CM






Z




CM







CO



T-

co




-

CO









CM

O






CM




CO




T-

1-




-






co




CM

UJ
Z




CM






co




•^

z



CM







co




,-

I




co








CM


T-

z




CM







CO



T-

Z



-------
UJ  C
-I S
ffl  C
|e|
Hi
- • • , qj ". ,
« W
-- "-a*"!:.
' ": *''" Vjn '•
if If
tL ; -f? , ;
Increase
regulated
community's
nderstanding of
CM
, :;,i,, '3 -,-
»"g.£jf?
|I l||
se||&
-• '3
!**«
Iff II
j-lfll
o ** co
E
(0
^
o>
s
n.

co







CM








z


CO







CM








O


-


CM













Q


co


CM













T
O





CM




CO








O


CM


CO













cn
o

CO
CM
















£

CO



CM













o:
EL





CM




CO








E


v-







CO








o
CO





-

CO


CM








Q
CO


co




CM











Z


CM


co













£


-







CO








1-


T—


co













>


CM







CO








£



-

CM













>


CO


CM




"-








1


-------




kBLE F-1
mtinued
4 w
£u









®sf
.C « O
nS®
° -a
iMf
o^aoaS
*iB?|:
Encourage
selfr
;. auditing
Provide site-
specific
compliance
assistance
"5
• ;•..:••.:»»-'
tS£f u;
«"Sce<
3jr n» ^ w ^3
£"5?>C S?
S®^=5 =
H|S|
If Ip
- 8f°-
3

•O H_
» 0_
«.w ox2 M
3>«=cc
09-sS £ O
2 i -e E:«
c * c 5.
» E-tjoS
S||-?s
g§ll°
_C 3
E
2
O)
s
Q.


-

CN



co





>



CO



T—

CN




§
^>



co

csj







T"
>
$









i
"5 CD
CO D)
Q. CO
E =
CN — O
i 1 ?
I I ^ 1
-1 fill
2 5 -1 § E °
"2 « s S S Q.
CD ^a co o CM c
°- S co ^ °- -2
..&*!£*!
1 | i 1 £ = 1
Z §) § ® 0 £ =
1 1 & ? 2 S 5
CO CO ° 3 3 ((j c
CO n) CD O O CD CO
-^ X' > 0 0 J- Q.
S c CD c c y x
5 Q. Q UJ UJ J= UU
1
X < O UJ < < CH
? 0 Q 2 2 QL Q.
I
(O
£
ce
z
 £
 CD
<

2

-------
u. S>
U{.£
—I *-
CO c
        CO
        o
        -22

        1
        0)
        CO
        (0


        1
        CO
        (0

        "0

        en

        "a5
        _a
        CO
        _co
        CO
        o
        O)
-2
"to
d)
o
X5
co
o
        co
        "co

        to
        c
        CO
        Q.

          co
        CO o

        £•£
        O co
        H CD
        CO ®
        V) E
STRATEGIES TO EVALUATE GOALS
CU
                    cc
(£.
                        cc
                          ^.El-i*.
                       03 .>
                       0.0
                      O X CD

                      "<"&

      ±±co
      E-o
      CO
                       CO
                     EX c £
                         CD
                   L. — -0
                   •Sici
                   lils
                        : o co
                        ill
                          •D fe< WTO co
                           * ° x'g * to
      CL-SILI- 0<
                           •
                            -
                          .C — .2        ^ISlls«*|
                                   P^ 03.S
                                   I-§51

                                   a«ll
                                   si-ir
s n
ra
es
track succes
uding an inter
ilizes and mat
o
s
                                      I
                                      I
                                      I
                                      S
we
nclu
tabi
e
                                      S

                                     c!
                                     o.t
                                     03 >
                                     03 £
                                     CD »
                                                        s
                                                         O== .

                                                         ^2§.
                                          • CD O) (D
                                          » *- c Q.
                                                            P
                                                            f *-
                                                          "5-
                                                         5
                                                         •
                                                         «
                                                         .£ co n-
                                                         C CD W

-  3
.2  MXJ
to  as c
S8o«
f|||
•6.«  -a
O 03 • ^
2 co 035
D.M- >•"
i_ 0== "
•sill
sirs
S5&S
£f -to-a
3£ CO C
"re «g 5°^
tsag&l
3-D c CS C

Ifl**
8ff««
    !££
o >— —
BcoE's
Ip-sl
— *M? "O CD C
co 2 a>£ a
ts
whi
                                              2 0.9 £
                                                         in
                                                                              o
                                                                              z
                                                                              £
                                                         t
                                                                      Z
                                                                      z

-------
(A
0}
111
U
O
t

at
ui
Of

|
u_
a


i
(O
01
a:
UJ
ffl c
?«
       (0

       o
       o
3
I
IU
&
(0
IU
5
s
E
(O
a:
o
o
£
a.
         "CO 09
         > =
         CDS
            pi!
            S-g"g
     ro^
     CD.C
     CO O
      3
         .CO

         iHfS-
          •S -O -5S SO n
nt
us
fo
ll SBAP se
. Some bus
hops have
and presen
ure for indu
the need
information about how w
ments have been positive.
r written materials. Worksh
on increasing our visibility a
e. We are creating literatur
lgated and as we learn of
Surveys su
majority of
more and b
We're worki
a wider audi
rules are p
         O

         CO
o
O
                  Q:
                  cc.
O
                     "O  i_
                     CO t CD £
  «l!l
  It&S
  ^•le-s
  CD CD CTC
  !l|l

  isn
  S_CO CD <0
  05 CO £ CO
  lift
  fill"
  O)
  i^i
  O co ^ ,.
  — 
  _>* CO o CD
  n«i
  1151
  Ml
  p co^ co
  o-gS*
  m m OL CD
  §£&§)
edi
pro
e
our
ack
l co
imp
r SB
ate o
eedb
ental
and
o
C,
                          ^
We evalu
through fe
environm
DNRE
hel
UJ
Q
                      c
                      CD

                      CD
                      co
                             O
s effective, but will seek
The manner of distribution
of requests next year.
                             S211S-5
                             03 w E^ «£-&£:
SBA
New regu
Division, ill
DC. SBT pr
the new regulations
he
o
Q
                IStllllpll



                aSS^SSgocg"
a
0.
t many goals in 200
inesses of each ind
were distributed to
heir calendars to m
recordkeeping co
al tool, in conjunctio
at the local level, 2
onducted after the
97% of participants
follow-upsurvey wil
or regulatory and te
eceived over 3,100
et
sin
m
u
ar
n
12
io
fo
Re
AP
b
d
o
tio
rm
ys
cate
l.
SB
many
Calen
notes
was a
educat
perfo
Surv
indic
helpf
requ
etc.
                               grlji°  fll|ii
                               5 85^?8  najhfel.
                                        o,,-g -B-g*
                                        il


                             O " ** > ^ c JieD"-CD
                                      ~-S'-c-Q=^ •^cDSSjS'o
                                      •gSwi . ffl-S co»>£S «j
                                                                   CD
                                                                    I
                                                                    §
                                                                    OJ
                                                                    O

-------
      C»
      at
      ui
      o

      g
      a.
      H

      UJ

      I
      01

      CO
 •5.2
      u.
      o

      (0
      to
      ut
      IT
^ "S
u. §

UJ C
-J +;
CO c
      I
      O


      1


      I

      g
      (O
      UJ
      O
      UJ
O CO U
CD 03 C

S"^ JS

° T5.S2

     C "5 CD
I*; —  t- w CD *!i

3 « g  '55 '55 5 2
03 CO O  -* rg (c; ^
S o-?=  S S c to

     ni
      i-

         o £ c  « ® -^
         003  **

         Q. 3 Q. .2 .o aj *j
*-?m
-------
u.  §

UJ  C
<•  O
po






CO
CO
UJ
1
0.
h-
z
"J
UJ
3
CO
tu
UL
o
J—
J
CO
"







STRATEGIES TO EVALUATE GOALS
5
ce.
o
o
(£.
0.
I
"5
C


CD
g
•c
o
£
CD
u

•fa
Q

"3
C
in
_£Z
E

u
CO
TJ
CD
•2
CD
•«
O
"S
1
m
K.
15 to"
Feedback from industry representatives with regard to
coverage and quality of information disseminated. Use of
SBO/SBAP (# of contacts) by targeted industry sector. Lev
of enforcement action assistance, clarification of regulation
permit processing, and technical assistance. Site visit
requests.
X





•o
c
CO
sz
CO
2
"»
0
*g
CO
CO
0
CO
%i- CD
'eo o^
8-5.=
Ill
CD £ =
5co8
t*\ n\ **—
We are using targeted efforts with the IEPA Bureau of Air t<
identify the number of small businesses affected by the rule
develop understandable information from the beginning,
measure those that come into compliance in the front end,
and identify those that have not responded to compliance
dates and make further assistance efforts informing them o
impending enforcement actions. We then get a new group
of businesses complying and can measure that against the
final number targeted for enforcement.




                                                                                                                                 00
                                                                                                                                   s
                                                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                                                   z
                                                                                                                                   o:
                                                                                                                                   <
                                                                                                                                   z

-------
     (O
     w
     tu
     K
     0.

     Ul

     in
     Of
     (O
     111
     s
     it
     a
     CO
!!li!i
CO JE — xT**^ T3
O
     I
     I
     !
     e
     s
     o
     s
     (0
     K
     O
     o
     K
     O.
ill!!!
illll!
Itllil
(O c CB 0> CO CD
           8?i = s
           CD 03 O.D £
omete ang
ing thetats
s and se ele
ure that mercury
areness through
ther
ontai
ing ite
nly en
ises a
st initiatives, we a
he Environmental
ent and tracking
is evidenced by w
e in telephone inq
ations that previo
's staff.
ercury
mercury-c
ry-containi
ents not o
but also rai
m
e
ing th
reem
orts i
reas
aniz
gra
For
usi
Agr
eff
inc
org
pro
ury - We held 13
lected over 2,000
st of other mercu
rcury. These ev
properly managed
state.
Me
coll
hos
                                       O *±
                                S®  (DO
                                E  "^ c
                             £.— co
                                           0-
                                       CO £0 03.*: =
/K <~ ^~ CO "^7
T3 03 i«- 5 5 £
C £ O £S*r
                             ci ? o"c,cu "
                             111^*11
sistance
hour of
ss of
ms are
r of
velop
n
s
e
e
r
er
de
evaluating our services.
and relate client
oals. We send an
lient or detailed a
ing more than on
uality and usefuln
rned evaluation for
generate a numb
ations. Also, we
we have worke
on
ck
go
e cli
q
tur
an
lu
om
ses
o tra
cific
-site
invol
the
d ret
t ca
eval
                                           £
                                           "H
                                           •c

                                           £
                                           c
                                           CD
                                           CO
n syst
e a s
progr
m to e
y assi
nt. T
ompl
datab
on th
f clie
feel it
ion
av
to
or
any
lient.
Co
a d
ed o
of
ati
t h
s
f
cli
.
to
se
ies
e
s
alua
not
tions
tion
d as
me)
nce.
d int
bas
tudie
ver
                                                                     £
                                                                     o
                                                                     z
                                                                     o:
                                                                     z
                                                                     <
                                                                     z

-------
                ^^ o
             CD  (DC
     S S
      CO !=

S S -0) O
CO CO C „. .
«>cSi5co
-c ro co -2 co

o -5 15 .2 S
u_
            • .C C CO S .—
           l!-pl^lil^ll^ll^li
                                       o
        a:
        o
        O
        a:
        a.
                               5-.2.£-5S3«"lcl^"ip

                               Eg.ilSfSSgSa^



                               CO^TJCDCO0— "='«•" =
                                         t

                                --CcTcooEotafco)2


                                il|||l!lll^
                                3 frt   ,J2 ^^ "^ CD ._ T^ ^^ ^^
CO
o


I
_CD

•o
CD
£

"co


01

%
CO
CD

'co
                                                               09
                                                               S
                                                               5-5
                                                    o o

                                                    ^5 co
                                                    £ "«

                                                    £8
                                                    > CO
                                                                  '
                                                                 CO 73
                                                                 EC
                                                                 g CO
                                                                  I
                                                                CD g CO
                                                                £ CC Q)
                                                               i-dio
                                                               ~
                                                               Q 5cN &
                                                                o

-------
HI

m
c




CO
CO
Ul
Vrf'
o
cc
fl.
"• 't~
*z
, Ul
Ul
a
RESULTS OF IVIEASI
-;,'



tn
STRATEGIES TO EVALUATE GOAL!
5
<
te.
o
o
Q.
CO
3 tn

|||
|||
•D-'«'o
SCO CO
C CD
O ^ CO
c CD
g CD co
O CO §j
"O *O o
i Q —
WTO^
® 3 ~S
A^ "m CTS
database on SBAP activ
ur client performance evi
contacts and assists stei
COO'S «
j|j|
E CD °
o c ®
-=0 g co
•f o £ -2 •=
Performance evaluation forms are sent to our clie
we have assisted. We have two levels of assistai
contacts and assists. Contacts are advice given 1
and seminars. Assists are extensive engineering
assistance, such as emission inventories, permit
applications, and on-site audits. We maintain a d
these activities and compare with previous time p


1


•o o
> .>.
Q.S
!il
in
£ o g
co-- Q.
CD ^* £
-C* 3 —
C*» CD
.Q o_
to.§."cD
E co g
Q ~Q Q
--•SJ2
im trainings indicated our
less questionnaires indie
of regulatory requiremen
e through our SBAP.
Evaluations fro
Returned busir
understanding
DEP assistanc
c >
o co
•-C-C
2* co
•ffi CO
^ CO
Questionnaires were sent to business sectors. E'
are used at all trainings. Discussions with busine
yielded additional comments.


LLJ

















o:
CD
>
$
!l
Program goals were not defined in quantifiable tei
did measure the number of loan program applicat


Q


E
&%
co'x
OS
H~
'35 o>
o >-
Q.CD

^ as
CD >,
to c
11
o*-
0 CO
an our events and visits ii
have worked with show t
qeneration.
The feedback <
companies we
use and waste
^

§1
0 §
We use evaluation forms with our events. We foil
companies to see how well our recommendations
and we track implementation rates.





                                                                                                                   s

                                                                                                                   i
                                                                                                                   K

-------
ffi c
< o
RESULTS OF MEASUREMENT PROCESS 1



2
2
0
Ul
>
UJ
p
tn
UJ
C9
UJ
£
«


S
o:
0
c
te.
0.
SBO - Positive experiences with SBO staff often are mentioned in the Ml
Economic Development Corporation's overall department effectiveness
service evaluations.
SBAP - SBAP evaluates the quality and effectiveness of its services by
reviewing projected and actual program objectives and technical assistance
levels provided on a monthly and annual basis. Measurement tools include
the reviewing and summarizing customer surveys that accompany new and
revised SBAP guidance publications, responses from evaluation forms
returned after each SBAP workshop, and appreciation letters from satisfied
customers. These report summaries follow for FY99-00 (10/99-9/00).
New workshops - 29 completed, objective met and exceeded by 45%.
Overall workshop evaluation on a scale of 1-5 (5=excellent): Permit to Install
(3 sites, 4 events) = 4.2 (average for all sites). Odor Management, Are You a
Good Neighbor (1 site) = 4.1. Regulations 101 (9 sites) = 4.5 (average for all
sites).
<0~ 0) ^
ftel c. Ij
§|"s;«2co § 8° £•£ §
Up!!
11 111
"^Oi_"cQco .32, ^ § CD~ O>^ C
Q "§ -Q W u CD "^ M '55 C fe ^T—
4=!t E"a"£ c ^)"S '> S *•* *» JS
il f||l ||||||i
t^ScUJifc 's C T5 15 CD c3> Q.
i5 S 2 ~ "£ o :| .| E j|-o
«ls|ll S§°-"§c-H5
||i||| |||i|i|
infill
CO Q} ._ U O) O CO ^3 T3 u. ^ C •Six
Percent of attendees anticipating future action or compliance based on
workshop activity: Permit to Install = not measured. Ml Air Emissions
Reporting System (6 sites) = 77% (average for all sites). Managing Odors,
Are You a good Neighbor = 37%. Regulations 101 = 84.4% (average for all
sites).















New guidance documents - 1 1 completed, objective 58% met with 9 finalized
and 2 drafts: MEARS Workbook Emission Calculations Worksheets - surface
coating, electroplating, foundry, hot mix asphalt, aggregate, oil and gas
production, and municipal solid waste; Ml Manufacturers' Guide to
Environmental and Safety and Health Regulations; Clean Air Act Compliance
and Disposal Options for Solid Waste (draft); and the Ml Administrative Rules
Process (draft).















Publication revisions - 1 completed, objective 25% met: Ml Air Use Permit
Technical Manual updated twice during this year.















1
3"
o
i
"S
Q.
1
S
CO
1
to
CD
CT
£
8
1
CO
'co
CO
CO
"5
c
'c
o
£
2
CO
CD
CO
o
Q.
CO i-
CD CD















I
«
CD
CD
5"
o
•o"
w
CD
Q.
O
O
1
!ss
'55
6















In-house permit assistance meetings - 18 completed, objective met.















Articles for newsletters, etc. - 12 completed, objective met.















»
                                                                                                                
-------
       CO
       CO
       Ul
       Ul

       Ul


       CO
       a.
       O

       £
       CO
       Ul
       CK
   *l*i
   js_E co .2
   co_ Et5
   S^s-i
Ul
-I
ffi
<
loans
ve
l
men
       CO
       <
       o
       o
       I
       S
       Ul
       &
       CO
       Ul
       o
       oc
       CO
luations - SBO conducted a review of
BAP's Small Business Environmental
oan Program to evaluate their enviro
impacts.
grant
of a
initiati
This
are
ntially
BAP
d data
ched,
p, etc.
re
507 g
iveness
tance in
dustry.
ot we ar
nd poten
we are
also are
ystem (S
detailed
sses reac
r follow-u
program
ents whe
al
ys
m
es
for f
e p
me
C
          ||liifSflS«;;jai

          Z)J=eo5.EScoc.£l—cocl—03co
K
O

§
Q.
                                        03 CO
                                        a:
                                        CO
                                             ®5 0~
                                            IP. II!
                                            "D "O CD -- tx w Q
                                            .£ £ ^ 3 0. £; .£
                                             ~ TS «-• S ">
We send out an evaluation survey to e
helped. Our on-site assessment team
on each facility they visit to see if the r
been followed. We are continuing to
P2/compliance guides and other techn
                                                   < 3*0
The program will continue t
seminars to assist business an
their obligations under the laws
measure these visits by trackin
monthly. Through coordination
(e.g., D, we provide proacti
In 2001, we expect a 100%
ethanol ilities (8-16), therefo
proactiv ermittinq require
                                                          UJ
                                                                  co
                                                                          o
                                                                          z

-------
   IB-D
   >%co _

   tfSf.

 QsgSt
       CO
       (O
       Ul
       O


       I

       z,
       IU



       I
       CO
       CO



       i
       Ul
u. §

UJ C
-I -J
CO c
       CO

      I
       Ul
       Ul
       CO
       Ul
       o
       Ul

       5
       a:
   _cg


 ^ — 0 =
 £o E°gj5


Hi! pi!
COO  _ CD i- OJ.C CO

lli^Jll


J11«&{^
jj ;— JJ5 •• ^^ ^y ^ ^-
C .£ --g 3 (Q g ^- g


> o o Sit^ -5
^ ^ **— c ^^ o ^ >
o Q o __ .«
            co
          £ 3
          — <« co
          CT3 C
          ago

          co co 'in
                               I
                               £
                               o
       CO

       E
   ^_  «

I ,« o ?  -2
<" S "P E  CB
^ S .= co -o o

s c ">~o c E

•2§8i^|
  _«*~ s* .^
               t- 0_ 05

                 -
               |??|i|
               * f F LL. CO m CD


               llielll
               m= E 3 COT3 CO
               > 03 O"5 3 C 3
                                CO CO
                                                          o.£ o co
                                                      1
                                                      OS

                                                      t
                                                                       I

-------
      CO
 CO
 CO
 UJ
 o
 o

"I


 IU

 UI
 te.

 CO
 u.

 O

 CO
 CO
 UJ

 K
>,c . = "0 EM  .'








^ w 5>4? ^ cS
                                                      Hill 11
                                                      CO =£5*- Q.Q.Q
                                   men ° "•- CO <» — •=
                                  I O)CO ^r	—. c o CO
                                                -ao O.CD C TOO)

                                        £rS£|2£
                                        c o "o m pio? CD
                                        _ I-K*=? (B
                           E § c.g? ato ?g c^ g* § g "fi | |


                          n28lili:|i8&5?lliS?««
     a) " o
     » c*:
     £ co CD

     §.££
      E
     (0 o  -
        8
 o:
 o
 o
                                                              o
                                                            «." &
                                                                >,CO O

                                                               ^ 'to E
                                                                CO
                                                                 o *—
                                                                 u* (13
                                                             m y C
                                                            > <0~i.£ O
                                                            > co> wo
                                                                    o

-------
          CO


          CO
0)
o>
UJ
u
O
BL
£L
UJ
S
UJ
K


I
UJ
S
u.
O
 CO
          CO
           03
u_

111
  C

   CO o
   ^3 O

   > —
   *g
    CO
   S CO
   ~ CD

   S3
   «S 2
   05 •§
   __ CO
   5 =
   Z A
   eo cojgc/3
   0)t3 0313 .
       s
       1
       UJ
(0
UJ

o
UJ
fg

(0
   CD CO ^ 015
      3 fc CT
   « | a, >
   (I) cn ^ *^
   > a  o o
          03  = "5 c

          liili

          CD CD CD
<
0£
o
o
Of
&
           %§i#s
           Mil
           S5|f|
           l!i=l
           lilii
                    5-  n*
                    - m    to*
                           CO .2 E
                     wsa
                     r=^* O>
                        =
           = °> CD-ass

           pill
           oO S .2 =
           «_ 2 O.CO
Hllf!
•K W O O.^ co
  o- g o> o .h=
                         .
                         SO
                                  5 -2
                           H^ll!
                           lilpll
           Sl^ls
                  >  £
                   HI
                  ^ g  CD
                   ir^s-^^Xsr-Q    *
                   •®.t;E*-to§s;'coucn4
                   "° E o o r 5 i ? P •£ 1
                   c?l°«®0§o|«J
                   |S-|||gil||:
                  O
_CO

§
O5
_eo


2

?
                                              o
                                       £
                                              CD

                                              CD
                                           _BJ
                                           3


                                       v. >  '-E
                                       3 fS  CO
                                       O  rnO-
                   — •C-0 C
                   T> 3 C tO
                   fDU. CD Q)

                   3 . O)5 03
                   CO "^z ^ — *^
                                              c
                                              COT3
                                       CO CO 03 CD
                                       <° E E"0
                                              5 o>5) o ^
                                              O<"OT3 CO
                           •||raE = ||

                           J° "> 2 c S ® co
                           £5li|-l
                           10 != J= = i-i ® '>
                           CO CD ]~ O m 2 ^
                           ~~ ?• CD  Sr CO QJ
                           COS O 03 g£ O
                           c i 5 '5 .t ® £
                           g E -g ja co ~ -g
                           co8l.£S-Sl«
                                                                       CD
                             CD
                             U
                             C
                            'co	

                             E|Q
                                                      CD


                                                      = |1

                                                     ?P=-go
                                               CO
                            |.sasS5:£
                              SJ5«i
                                                       •co =S
        iifs
-------
CO
CO
UJ

I

Q.


Ul

Ul
K

1
Ul

u.
O
CO
        CO
        Ul
^ "S
u_  o
—
ffl  C
            tr
            2
                CO
                to
                8
                s
                Q.
                s.
                CO
                CD CO
                to -a
•a c
CO CD
o e
rog
^S
•o co

    CO C
   -=J=
   D..SS
   OS
               CO CD
        2
        ,3
        o
        ui
        I
        <
         e
         CO
         UJ
         o

         I
         CO
•o
03
Q
O
03

CD
"D
Ol

'S
.a

£
CO
JO
o
s

ffi


£
3
CO
CO
CD
easurement method to account h
ve reached. We track how many
ation or orientation about the
alliances with interested
ha
fo
blish
tishing a
inses w
s quest i
nd ill est
ns
ise
S C CO t o
CO '53 CD CO ~

-till

> E J3 Q.O
re
         0£
         O
         O
                          
                           to"
          ^5JS co " to
          Q._co == i^ CD
             Q. co^S o as
n
u
ps
se
try
de
us t
ith industry through on-site
ct sheets, and industry/govern
the creation of new policies a
s ensure continued work with
aintaining databases on indu
activities provided to them al
ogram goals. Case studies
performed, and thus pollution
reinforces our success in get
to understand their environm
rk
fact
to t
ble
M
r p
nce
ted,
nity
Our
English f
has led t
delivera
sectors.
assistan
meet ou
assistan
eliminat
commun
             CC
itting info
                                            CD
                                            Q.
CO CD
'co to
to co
CO CD


.E-E
to to
cum


£.1
  4—»
  C
CO?
co C.
03 CD
es
number of busi
• to regulatory ii
                                            1- Q.
ion
                             O
                             CO
                                                   cc
                                       £
                                       o .
                                       2,1
                                       CD'£
                                       > <0
                                       s-g
                                       li
                                       is
                                       i a
                                                      COS
                                                      3 CO
                                          il o
                                          f « 0
                                                      Q--D'CD
                                                      1^1 CO 05

                                              IN
os
                                              cx^S
                                              ^^-g
                                              jg S c
                                              •£ = ®
                                              § £ ™ to
                                              «- « S-c"
                                              ss^r
                                              {151
                                              E "* o^l

                                              g.'8lS
                                              mi

                                              n is
                                              M CD c CO
                                              =0^ CO'S
                                              <» ° 5 c
                                              IcoSl
                                              'cD^Sro
                                              •S E— o
                                              CO 3 Cflti=
                                              ^c.»:i
                                              21o°
                                              ® JJ-C r-
                                              |?Jg-|
                                              l^feS
                                              Z CO 5 Q.
                                                  JOCN   U     •
                                                  » -o CD S .5 2 "8
                                                               co
                                                                    cos eo.
                                                  •? co i § to IS -e
                                                   §m-§J=Sg»
                                                        eo-=
                                               0 r- S „, E 0 tO
                                               c •= -£ £ co c ^5

                                               fili
                                               t CO r-
                                               § «
                                               u.E
                                                         CD
                                                                                 oc.
r service through
rveys for all hotline
p. Tracking the
lemental
usinesses may
r an enforcement
he community
mber of small
ustomer satisfaction with o
es and customer service s
sistance visits, and works
all businesses using Sup
tal Projects (towards whi
on of the penalty owed u
benefit the environment
olation occurred), and th
Measuri
questio
calls, si
number
Environ
apply a
order,
where t
                                                                                         <
                                                                                         z

-------

        00
     CO
     CO
     Ul
     o
     o
     ut

     UJ
     <£.

     CO
     <
     Ul

     u.
     o


     I

     CO
     Ul
     Of
          CO 03 CO

          '
           1^ CO _
           CO CD § JO


           0^1 g5

           8??a


             ofi

          C0-i= C
UJ
§

C
o 15 co •£
X o">
      on
      o
      O
      £
      £L
                •&go>«
           ,J.S -£ = 5 S .•.»

iwl = :l
§>Wco to
                        3 8 S 0 g E

                        "o£^g
                           CJ CD en
                                  o
1|  111
f-llli
iiiin
                                            O)

                                            o
                                            o>
                                            o
                                            •o
                                            CO


                                            i


                                            1
                                            CO
                                            ro
                                                              u.

                                                              |
                                                              •flS
                                                              co

                                                              I.£2
                                                              O CO



                                                              It
                                                              ?c
                                                                             00
                                                                              i
                                                                              IE

-------
ll §
UJ c
-i •-=
CD C
< °
S O
       (0
       CO
       IU
       O
       O
       o:
       Q.
      •3
      I
      ut
      5

      I
      e
      CO
      §
      Ul
       a:
       o
       o
       cc
       a.
          O)

          "eo
          CD
          £
          o
          o
          T3
          CO
  -u_
Si Si
 CQ O
              CO

          II ll
          £0-I-'
                 <0 TO -fs to
           _

           "
      la^^if.
      Mitslrf
        E = !
£S£l
      •= c m „- S 5 ^T
                   o <"  x .2
                    03 o 5)LLI
                            - « r- ^ i: *"  w

                            Ml 11^1
                            ^'5lai'!s
                            
-------
       03 CO
           03 O
CO
co
UJ
o
g
Q.
SUREME
u_
O
CO
«o
UI
           03 m •— r* t-1
       o £. Q.,0) 03 a, '5
                {Illllaj
                -o Q-gfb SJra
                = <2*-*-,5 E£ 3
                «>T3 C 3U § i_ O
                 _   n\ O   -W /> ^
e
b
ls 1 , 2,
rence
ernm
state,
sults.
her inf
ures fo
rted th
ov
s s
re
ath
edur
ort
ss on goal
ions, confe
small go
ing in this
roducing r
red to ga
ing proce
ill be rep
cess.
re
t
er
ey

                 (0 -*^ C
                 c*S2
UJ  C


< ,9
       C Q.CO 03 §g
SL
  O)
     pi
     ,2 C13 CD
                             £
                °- ,-  • 0.'= »
                i!lli£
      Sf
                     to 2 o ® 'f
                     ^-
 oc
 C
 a
 a.
                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                    CM
                                                                                                     cc
                                                                                                     z

-------
           CO

           Q.
           .2
           '55

           (0

           CD
           «:
           cc
           i

           -o
           c
           CD
           -5-

           CD
           en
           cu
           CO
           CO
           
•a

ro









S







S

cc
"S
Q.
£

CD
E CO
-Q O)
25

-------
   (0

   o
   o
   o
   o
   HI
   (O
   Q
   1
   eo"
CNI H
u-g
UJ

GQ
   (0
   O
   O
   O
   CD

   §
   Q.
   O

   (O










ACCOMPLISHMENTS
S
2
o

"*•












cc
z


CO
CO
.Q
JO
<
*-
0
S g;
" i
i_T £
'5 5
^— (0
CO 03
i_ C
O "?
i
» as
2 *•
•— CD
01 "a
The Department of Environmental Conservation (not the Air Permit Program SBAP) produced a web-based permit <
waste, water, and food-oriented permits issued by the Department. Users answer survey questions, and the guide
permits may be needed based on their answers.



s
CO
JO
<
-a
Nl r\ f • C ^
«!« ||t|ijS

I||I|I||||
O £ JS (0 "Q ^  O) o •—
"> O) ~ ~C *^ ® P-— *"
c ^ ~c (jj c -^ >s Q) ^j-

If jo  _Q
!s .5 
»= 0) i_
O JZ 3
CM O) g
Dry cleaners compliance calendar has been downloaded from our web site and is being modified for use in at leasl
EPA SBO newsletter also highlighted PL's success in improving recordkeeping compliance rates. Printers Protecti
Workbook has been selected for inclusion in the 2000 EPA Audit Source Book and is available for downloading fro



CO
-J^
o
LL.

-------
u_  2
-
00



ACCOMPLISHMENTS
S
f^
uL
o
o
fV"
1^
0.




0>
1 =
m ffi -?0
SBAP facilitated the participation of a local small business owner in Forum 2000: Building Compliance Assistance Partnerships. Th<
business owner also was a member of our CAP. The purpose of the conference was to promote dialogue among state and local agi
tribes, trade associations, community groups, and industry. Participants exchanged information on the latest issues affecting compli


CO
's
s
o


T3
CO
assistance development and delivery, reviewed the most innovative approaches to encouraging quality environmental performance,
recruited partners to develop projects for up and coming compliance assistance priorities.







t_
*— ... rti
!S!
•s | °
"o < "O



SBAP presented 3 workshops, "1 Am From the Government and 1 Am Here to Help," at the request of the Atlanta Dry Cleaners Assoi
SEFA Board members, and dry cleaners from Albany. SBAP staff and speakers from the Air Protection Branch and the Hazardous \
Branch spoke on dry cleaner requirements, hazardous waste requirements, compliance investigations, which programs can help, an
issues. More than 178 people attended.














8 *
0 £
SBAP was approached by the Southern Dry Cleaners Show to do a variation of the above workshop for a 4-state audience in April 2
GA's SBAP worked very diligently and secured the participation of the SBAPs from SC, AL, FL, and MS. To put this in perspective,'!
Southern Dry Cleaners Show has been held every 2 years since the 1980s. This was the first time the show offered environmental
information to their attendees. The show had more than 2,100 attendees. SBAP distributed 397 documents and made several









presentations.









SBAP conducted joint inspections of dry cleaners in Savannah and Albany with EPD's Hazardous Waste Branch as part of a joint
Compliance Assistance Initiative.









SBAP partnered with the Pollution Prevention Assistance Division and hosted the Printers' Flexographic downlink on 4/27/00.







m co
S s
.. _ to c >< c
? s _ i < i .9
Lee Tate and Anita Dorsey-Word attended the annual SBO/SBAP Conference in Missoula, MT, 6/17-22. SBAP moderated 4 sessioi
SBAP/SBDC Partnerships - Success Stories and How To's, Title Ill/Title V Interface, Financial Help for Small Businesses, and Gene
Permits. SBAP staff attended sessions on permitting, advertising and marketing, and P2. The conference theme was Helping Smal
Businesses and the Environment Through Education and Outreach. Anita Dorsey-Word was on the 2000 Planning Committee and v
responsible for 4 sessions. The most notable of these was the last general session on The Future of the 507 Programs. In addition,
served as a mentor to 2 first time attendees. The Conference also was attended by one of our CAP members, Jimmy Johnston. Jirr
presented in Title Ill/Title V Interface for the second time. He was requested to present this year because of the success of his sess
year.







1
CD
SBAP presented at the Southern States Annual Environmental Show on Customer Service: How to Assist Small Business on Enviro
Concerns (9/26/00).






•o
93
•a
1
CO
SBAP staff presented at SBAP's Annual Region IV Conference, Nashville, TN. Twenty-five people representing all Region IV states
as did the Reqion IV Small Business Liaison, Annette Hill, and the EPA SBO, Karen Brown. Highliahts of the conference included a






                                                                                                                                   CSJ
                                                                                                                                     I

-------













ACCOMPLISHMENTS
S
f£
O
g
o.





_
"5j
CO

S
1
in
_o
i
O
1

3
i
^













We responded to a request from the Albany Regional Office on providing education/outreach materials 01
businesses in Lyons, GA.

"c
o

CO
'S3
o
03
CD







_
o o o
.£* c jo
e i s
§ ® S
= i a
3 E o
III
111
£ 03 -o
<- CO O
CO 03 Q
ECO %
CO *
2 g 3
?i*
£ .i «
SBAP was requested to serve on a small business advisory board for a Business/Government Outreach
West Georgia, headed by Professor Stanley M. Caress. This Program is a multi-state initiative involving
PA, OR, and NC. The School of Public Affairs and Administration received an EPA grant to provide outre




















proposed NESHAP rules.







'S §>0''5<2 • ""

£ — IB co'aj^D-aajsl^-^.c
•§ Z g Q-.E ^SSO^IaJ^
fljCD^^C 'm®"O\_S2m^"'
A duty of the SBO's office is to aid in investigating and resolving complaints and disputes from small busi
businesses requesting assistance. US EPA SBO contacted the SBAP and asked us to handle a complai
Homerville, GA. The case involved a timber company, EPA Region IV, and EPD. A second request cam
Independent Businesses (NFIB) Executive Director, who needed assistance for one of his members. (Th
associations credited with the development of the SBAPs under the CAA.) The Executive Director was n
Stan Hathcock. The case involved Region IV's EPCRA office and a small gasoline marketer. Region IV
determined they were not in compliance with reporting requirements under EPCRA Section 311 and 312.
exempt from reporting, because they sold gasoline. The company was fined approximately $19,000 for f
MSDSs to the local fire department and GA EPD. US EPA prepared the NOV. GA SBO explained that v,
however, we agreed to provide some documents and to contact the Region IV Small Business Liaison an
up the process. This case also was referred to Senator Paul Coverdale's and Representative John Linde
with leg work" by providing copies of EPA policies on EPCRA, Enforcement and Supplemental Environmi
needed additional time to respond to the order and to review the documents. We contacted Ms. Karen B
contact Region IV on behalf of the business. She did so, and Region IV granted them an additional 30 d:
copy of the penalty matrix to NFIB. (The company and GA SBAP had requested a copy from Region IV £
a copy of the penalty matrix.) NFIB was very pleased with our assistance in this effort.














1
CO
C
o
_CB
2~~

W
*co
s
§
1
0.
£>
<1)
5
•s
4^
SBAP prepared economic impact statements for 3 proposed rules. SBO office assesses the direct impac
businesses. The Division's policy is to minimize adverse impacts to the extent feasible.









0) „•
c Q-
is
« w
C .CO
O ^r
?$
J^
11
CO ^
C CD
O t-
••§'§
Sf
OS CO
A CAP member works with a nonprofit organization that created an award winning urban garden. His org
brownfield-type work in one of the older neighborhoods in Atlanta and was nominated for an environment







£
0
_w
i
CD
V)
CD
nsfer of th
E
j=


-------
—
00















ACCOMPLISHMENTS
s
<
U~
o
o
f^
K
£L


» H CO °&
i5™ | i £
•— C — . • O) .ii w
«l « S o on
eg 15 « S Q_ = OS
C CO £ O> CD Tg CD CD
« 0_ o 
"c
;o
3
CO
1
ffl
£
LU
T5
CO
a.
2
CO



CO
'o
c
=

-------
CM  "Q
iL  §
UJ  C
-I  ~
CO  C












I
UJ
to
~ - t
5.
"2.
"I
' .<



S
te.
0
o
te.
0.





TJ
CD
CO
^
O
'55
CO
E
CD
CD •
C CO
e fiberglass industry on styre
gh workshops and fact sheet

ll
_g> £>
CO -o
Q..E
"jr .22
•o «
li
CD U
f. S
•t 21
O -*
IN's Compliance and Technical Assistance Program i
continues to assist businesses involved in the rule m



CD
C
CD
'•a
c
CD
CO JC
co «-
§ £ CO'
O Q. CD
"S «!=•*
Si T3 0 .2
'C 0) S -o
?•= CD W
8 « S^
t- CT CD
e o 2 CD
S"co ic •*=
CO U rn
rhe Childcare program has b
together with IDEM's Commi
training video for the staff at
id lead inspectors and providi
- CO ^
. c u o
| § g>g
III!
i ^ ^ 1
"S iJL Q.
= .«.»<
jz = j= O
r- - % Q) CO*
•£ a? 1 c CD
CTAP's Childcare 5-Star Program, the first of its kind
radio, television, and newspapers throughout the stat
event honoring several facilities that received 5-Star i
First Lady also provides the video's introduction. Sor
assessments for Childcare facilities and citizens' hom










0
S
CO
o
CD
CO
CD
CO
CD
U
erning the evaporation of dry
•^
cy document go>
o
Q.
CD
E
o
CD
Q.
O
CTAP worked with our Office of Land Quality to deve
water under the hazardous waste rules.










CM
i- ^

|S
o c .
o §• 1
^ -Q CD

lich created a Task Force to \
ice facilities must go above a
o address the needs of this a

rder (4/22/99), w
/ehicle maintena
lops specifically
Oi|
% s|
'•§ s ^
1 o «r
* -S2
LU | 0
£ co CD
!•§ 5
Governor O'Bannon signed the Greening the Govern
opportunities. As a result of this initiative, state agen
environmental regulations. To assist these agencies









CM

"CD
_o

CM

I
emission inventory. Comple
ment.
T3 CD
e a state require*
Is asbestos abat
H
1 -2
o 3
>, Q
gZ ^»
ft a
Provided assistance to all small businesses in Scott <
compliance assistance workshops. Developed a vide




CO
5
-
                                                                                                                                   .2
                                                                                                                                   is

                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                                   I

-------
u_  2

iu  c
-i • <0 § w CO JO O °- * 5F X' O O "S CD
ill i !i tfll!
Sal £ §Sm§»$ 2-s jE5JeJ2
O > i- ±i 5 .a c .£ -c n <5 F l^-o2o±=
Illl flirt !i Hill
itti Jim
Our move to multimedia was necessary to meet the needs of our clients and for the continued su
branch office in Wichita. An SBAP staff member was hired/located for the Wichita/Sedgwick Cou
to the industries in that area of the state, greatly increasing program visibility and decreasing trav
2000 was a record year for the program, with both hotline calls and on-site assistance increasing
over 60 visits to individual businesses, respectively.
While many businesses call about regulatory concerns, by combining the P2 and SBAP services,
compliance assistance while still being exposed to P2 concepts. Several businesses have imple
successful workshops, manuals, and assistance provided by the technical assistance componeni
environmental compliance but P2 as well. This program strives to network with other agencies tti
general business assistance (such as the SBA, SBDCs, and the KS Department of Commerce ar
both ways in referrals) provides businesses with accurate information "the first time" and eliminat
Partnering with the Wichita Water and Sewer Department and the Photo Marketing Association t<
recovery technologies to medical and dental clinics, and commercial imaging and photo processc
of local dentists have documented implementation of such processes.
To address non-point source pollution, we adopted the US Department of Agriculture's Home*A*i
help people identify environmental risks in their homes and surrounding property and is useful foi
program has been well received, with education, training, and outreach efforts continuing through
agents now promote the program and materials, including the abbreviated home self-evaluation f
the program. Documents now are available on the Home*A*Syst web page, with said materials b


CO
CD
CO
C
CD


0)
£
13
c
presented at a luncheo
During 2000, our CAP gave its third Small Business Air Quality Stewardship Awards, which were
Governor's mansion. The program has generated good will and publicity for all participants.

>,
o
3
CD







Q:
z

5
O
ifc
-_
CD
§
"™ «5
CO c
>> i_ P
•* 3 CD
Pollock, LA to plan ne>
nultimedia functions. C
II as the Secretary's Aw
We organized a 2-day strategic planning session in November at the Episcopal Retreat Center in
completed 18 P2 audits and mailed 800 dry cleaner calendars. We moved our SBAP to include r
Manager (Mr. Dick Lehr) was presented with the Employee of the Year for the Department as wel

CD
C
CO
'.S
o







The SBAP is fully multimedia.


^
t
"c
CD
                                                                                                                   I

                                                                                                                   I

-------
u.  2
UJ  C
   O


ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1
o
g
a.




SBAP started a compliance advice column in the Department's monthly newspaper. The idea is for small businesses to submit complianc
related questions that can be answered in the paper. The answers are designed to be in concise, plain English with program-specific
contact information for more detailed answers. The newspaper is distributed to about 7,700 recipients.


TJ
C
co
t-
cc
2


OL
1

_c
u
to
CO
CO
CO
5

n_ •= to
SBAP trained more than 1,483 business, industry, regulatory, and consulting personnel during FY99-00 at 20 statewide workshops. SBA
continues to work with other state and local agencies and industry organizations to provide a unique combination of multimedia outreach.
An example of this level of outreach was delivered by SBAP in its first ever multimedia workshops, Regulations 101, which highlighted a
newly developed guide for manufacturers on applicable environmental, safety, and health regulations. Other examples of multimedia and
collaborative efforts for outreach were delivered through additional adjunct training sessions, sponsored either by other state agencies or
industry organizations to provide information on air pollution control to business, industry, and government personnel. These 15 addition;
training events attracted a listening audience of 868. The technical service provided or customer service displayed during FY99-00 is
reflected in 9 letters of appreciation that were written by either industry or other state government agencies commending SBAP staff on th
excellent level of technical assistance (information and service) provided.


CD
O5
IE

5
= *- CD
.= en o
SBAP was reformatted by management from an air quality program that provided some multimedia assistance to an officially recognized i
multimedia program within the agency. This change also included the development of an agency-wide memorandum of understanding th
authorizes SBAP to provide confidential compliance assistance within all environmental media. MN was one of 10 states to receive a
Section 507 Grant from EPA. The grant will be used to conduct and measure the effectiveness of a sector-based nonregulatory complian
assistance initiative within MN's fiber reinforced plastics industry.

to
o
i

2


OL
•z.

o.
CL
'
-------
ui
 c
I
u




















ACCOMPLISHMENTS
5


O
O
jC
tt.


t-
o a,
o o
«•* c
>< „ CO
15 O :=
C CO O.
03 CO E
is8
§Q"S
o Z £
c» . .2
~ s -°
-5 8ti
us
C $ M
i i: ra
0) 3 
•% °
;C „ a)
1 =
5" E §
T3 OJ CO
0) C CO
e » w
3 -Q -a
3 »i C
We established an Assistance Team composed of representatives from each program (m
outreach efforts, aid in identifying sectors that need assistance, and ensure efficient use i!
established 5 Field Offices throughout the state to provide community-based assistance a
assistance providers within the Waste and Air Programs.



CO


CD
Z




















o:
z



CO
•c
cc
a
Z
3  o ro «s
c g "S g .fo
S S S = "°
c° £ 5 co co
I s 2M
O — cp c —
lilll
" S <°-o o)
ll?!l
'I ® £ co 8
« s o co o.
^ ^*S tfi ±± o
S ^s ™ 3 vj
c 8 > eo o
1 1 Z | ?
j= c «; -i o
U 0 CD — C
CO 35 S = C
£i % E 8
o Tg 1 « S
The Program continues to be warmly received by the business community. We continue 1
regulations are promulgated and affect an increasing number and type of businesses. In
number of referrals from other media programs to provide holistic assistance to small busi
implement the PrintSTEP program at the state level. This grant will allow us to accelerate
effort to this important industry sector. This will be the third major industry sector to benel
to businesses.
£
Ic
CO
Q.
CO
I

O
Z
•E
i
CO
0)

o
•~
CO
I
•+•*
o
3
i
§
o
CO
c
CD
„
O)
BAP was
c/>

CO
m
SBAP/SBO received one of 10 national grants from EPA SBO to publicize the state progn
by the NJDEP for its service to small businesses.



0)
CD
—3

CD
Z




















a:



a
2
^
a
Z

° co §
C •n"3*^ir»O*- «o
•— c c £ ^T S c $ .£2
c o co 2 ^* co Q5 co 'c^
"cO-rco'Soo'coE o^l
CD +5 « nj jQ 2> ^ CL . o Q)
^ E flj flj co «2 o *^ ^n
|i®-3-§'i>'ll"2
1 S.i"st.l| ?o'|H
1 = 1| Hill If
>-".2t->.g-j=coo.Sci->>
||||||1| c| |
o S^o^^j? ^*c >,E^
5S c ^? ^~ fli O «2 ® ^ c
S "^^ * -S* ^ ^ -*— c £ "co o co

^ ® ^ 03 *5 ^ "^ *C P

O S'uJ'OJ ^CD01'^ 
-------
Ul  C
—I «5
m  c











<: AQCOMPUSHMENfS

s
^
oc
o
o
oz
0.


CO
c S *-
O CO CD o
* >» "C C 03
ts jc £ c "§5 oi£
CO oj -Q O = CO 3=
.« co 2 '•§ m g> *
i "> e E "5 5 c
CO -Q — ^ CD S *3
fill!!!
'5 $ .e 8 § f; ^
gj g co 'E . f o
jg -° CD CD <2 •£ -o
l!£s|if
-o ® j o :> £ §.
•§ 5 li * == * «
nplishment this year was a brand new web site, which is built around an Ora
web site features a one-stop location for all permitting data. The permit data
by subject area, and by Division. The search function provides up to 20 attri
forms, fee pages, regulations, contact information, and specialty information,
also can track their permit application status for permits in progress across £
rogram to provide a single point of contact for a company to identify requiren
ts, and track the permit throughout until a permit decision is made. We have
this multimedia assistance.
Our most significant accor
server pages (.asp). The
search, by user category,
downloadable application
spreadsheets, etc. Users
stop permit coordination p
apply for necessary permi
small businesses know of
CO
c
1
CO
O
€
o
Z












CD
O

CD
1
CO
Q
•c
o
Z

c § <=
o * .2 .co
g>T5 2f ! "I
1 * =?£ -
J!c E
"3 03
, St.
SS c ®
® *~ to C f
=| £. .§ j£ 5
S "c 1 S> "§
en c ®
n" ? E '> co
•a "o ° Q. ~
"« ^ ]| "o w
2 eo "P CO O
— to .E i: Q.
sit customers said they would contact us again for help. In 2000, SBAP staff
ipanies located in 54 of 88 OH counties. Agency field staff often have expre
ns.
al elected officials have better and more trusted access to small businesses
hasis on outreach to state legislators, county, and city/town officials. The ou
:nts impact small business and where help can be found. This is critically im
1 battles against proposed US EPA standards.
SBAP - 99% of our site vis
site assistance to 161 con
businesses rectify violatioi
SBO - We believe that loc
have placed a heavy emp
about how CAA requiremc
coverage focuses on lega





o
•C
o


•o
CD
•Z
CO
.0
CD
CD
CO
£
3? -c
5 u
* s
w J5
1°
£ 0)
ID ^
cS'1
U 1C
2 -=
rd representing the small business community in the air quality rulemaking pi
:o provide comprehensive multimedia regulatory assistance through our mete
We continue to work towa
on new, innovative paths 1


CO

o
.2
^f
O












OL




c
a
C
O

g
.2 c
£ 2~ CL
•5 LLI
o .0 DJ ^
|I -d 2
£§. |§
* CD C °.
Mis
g- js » t3
CUM;:
o 4 S 8
~ p > co
-.- ^ _ 05
isti?
f 8§?
\ssistance Account was implemented and the application process was streat
is available to small businesses that want to undertake P2 and energy efficie
icy Site Assessment Grant Program was implemented and the application pr
holder to apply for the grant. This program provides up to $5,000 to small b
> hire a private consultant to conduct a P2/E2 assessment.
The Pollution Prevention /
low-interest loan program
Prevention/Energy Efficier
allows for any DEP permit
permit holder that wants tc

CO
CO
>
to"
c
CD
Q.












a:
z


8
fy
O
•c
CD

Q_


CO
CD 5
f 2
o c
8 "=
CO 0
co Q-
§1
o §
-1
If
CO CO
&*
£1
emphasizing P2 and occupational health. Through the Pollution Prevention
for Reducing Squid Wastes went into effect. Groundbreaking technology en
lution at the source.
MOU for autobody shops,
Underutilized Fish Project
successful in reducing pol

•o
CO
O)
CD
1

U.












a:
z
CO
_c
1
CO
o
.c
c
CO
                                                                                                                        i

-------
u.  2}
UJ  C
—i '<&
CD  C




«
ACCOMPLISHMEN













5
<
te.


O
f^
£





















o:

JO
"o
Jc£

CO
Q
£
"3
o
CO
regional SBAP meeting. An energy
ry cleaner compliance calendar. Staff
e. Staff made presentations at group
co ^ y
•O CO CD
« 0) E
co .E E
O Q. §
.c o o
ECD *-
_ > o
S CO JO
O _r ^
fc..|f
.<0 * CO
^ T3 .C
^ 03 U
local newscast program. T
:ation requests. Staff assist
ss associations, NFIB, and i
03 c »
c CD .E
O CO CO
"i o.-0
i_ fl%
3 « •§
en C ™
J> ° «
CO ^ £
i 1 '*
!c £
1*1
•^ — £
o = —
If!
ill
CO m O
03 9 5
c 5 >
8C "O
SK-2 C
O) 13 03 a>
55 £ £ g>
C 03 0)-=
® 52 £ «
c § £ |
< u co E



CD
03
CO
CO
03
C
03
1-
te and federal reporting requirements
e compounds are in excess of
es of air authorization requirements.
iderstanding and assist in report
1 § i 3
M £ '0 CD
S c .2 "S
r" ^ **— w
-  ^ £
educate and inform the me
,> compounds generated as 1
cted a mailout alerting anhy
iducted statewide for 298 at
ig requirements.
O .B 3 fe .!=
Si E 8 §-
igc 8 a^
« o -D o -g
•§ <« i S 8
S 03 "£ CO
03 CO S O '-
•fc "S S _: £ O
3- $ « ^5
«s S? ^i
iS 5 1 53
f! 1| IS
a, c b s go:
•£ 03 . i CD 03 3
111 II If
•- 03 J= E .E CD CO
O) C£ <*> P -g § a
03 i_ Q. c ^ O a>
2£ £ < < D£ a.






CO
CO
X
03
1-


















(T






£
cn
3 TO










d>
c
[eo
03
1
O
£
E
S
O)


Q.
1
03
Q.
03
6





"c


03
>
epresenting over 50 service providers
te each other on goods and services.
ind potential needs in regulations
tant result of the Forum was the
i to the small business community of
^Sfo
8 £8_ E|
"2 T> 3 'Z E
i § I si
!?!? c -°
co t te iff ,-
S §:§ co-1
1 §3 § 8 |
m To o- £ 03
— (•> •. Q5 w
ta 3 ^ S "£
E o- o. co S
cn -m 3 o>
- c 8 ® -o
g s ?i s
o S £ -° •£
^ Q5 _ ^^ Q
2 o 5 $ ^
5 42 1 f S
^ll P m > CO
Sllis^





CD
'E
P>
k_
>
began inspections on St. Thomas/St.
its.
II
CO
X «
SCO
,, CO
O CO
^J 03
« =5
c *P
£°
Q. 03
2 £
bile repair and refinishing st
personnel on St. John to do
O .Z"
E o
0 jc
"3 °
. CO ™
"S S
CO 03
0 ^
.2 ^3
t5 T3
1-
-£ §
M
®E
03 03
Q. CO
II
0 £
"oo 5
o ^
to =
03 "3
«-°.
-c c
03 .C
1^

03
•o
C
CO
Zs
c
'O3
^.
>


















CC


c
Q

"5
CO
CD
^
5

-------
W TJ
u.  £
UJ  C
—I '-S
CQ  C


ACCOMPLISHMENTS
5
<
a:
§
0£
a.


i5 « _ CQ
.= .C O)
.CO -- C C
> B >, . ~
SBAP staff expended a large proportion of time and effort on 2 agency initiatives: Minor Source Application Revision, which included re
minor source permitting application forms with a team of permit engineers; and Permit Benchmarking, comparing WV's permit process 1
of other states. Both should benefit small businesses through the eventual streamlining and simplifying of agency procedures. Quantif
improvements is impossible at this point. This is one of the problems if programs over-emphasize conventional performance measures
Also, in 2000, the SBO position was made multimedia. Due to the addition of other programs (as opposed to just Air Quality), SBO was
transitional state, making the necessary assessments to plan for future multimedia activities.

CO
'c
'E?
>
w
CD
§
_.,. •*-•
S «° -
- 2 2 m <°
SBAP continued representation on the EPA National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology. A representative frorr
SBAP was selected to serve on this council in 1999 and continues to participate on this federal advisory council as a member of the
Compliance Assistance Advisory Committee.
SBAP representative chosen to conduct a presentation to unveil the EPA Compliance Assistance Clearinghouse at the Environmental
Innovations Symposium.
SBAP taking the lead and chairing the National SBAP Promotional Committee. Presented the committee's activities to the 507 progran
the annual conference. Continuing work on national branding and a national advertising campaign with an advertising agency out of
Washington, DC to better promote the services and presence of 507 programs.
SBAP representative chaired the National Steering Committee representing SBAP and SBO programs from 4/97 through 6/00.
CAP selected a chairperson this year. CAP arranged a meeting with directors from both Wl DNR and Commerce. The topic was whett
some multimedia work would be appropriate for the CAP as well as for SBAP technical assistance. They received approval for adding ;
multimedia focus, but without statutory change to make it official for the program. Since the program received tentative approval to do
multimedia outreach in 2000, future outreach efforts will take that into account. To help on that, the SBAP's newsletter and fact sheet
mastheads have been updated and already have received many compliments. This is expected to draw more contacts when displayed
conferences, etc.
The CAP gave presentations to the majority of Wl DNR regional staff to reach out and let them know the group is a resource for small
businesses and that DNR can refer to them for assistance.



C
"a>
o
u
co
§

m
We are especially excited about progress currently being made with our Compliance Assistance Grant Project as well as the Clean
Snowmobile Challenge design competition that we are actively supporting. Both projects have great potential to enhance environmentc
performance of businesses in our state and the quality of the environment in which we live.



O)
E
§,

                                                                                                                           s
                                                                                                                           £
                                                                                                                           1

-------
  (0


  i
  o
  o
  tt
  CL
  UJ
£8
rn O

< O
  (0
  o:

  UJ
  CO
  a.




























5/BARRIERS
£L
, P-










S
2
0
i
Q.








































tr


|| Alabama








































{£.
2


CO
to
.CO








































&.


1 Arizona
.=
?
o
k_
O)
"at
1
CD
i
CD
i
t

o
O
Q. "^
s i
'co 2
2 ^
c •—
— Ic

o f^
••s= £
.55 p
Q. ^~
O TO
~
8|
1 |
co i
•o ^2
— 1
c ^

C CT
.2 1
0) <°
.£ o)
JC C
§1
1E-
|£
CO t—
•4-* t.
(A CO
IS
CO "c
2. «
Barriers
Still not enough inspections, rec
in the country; businesses cons

o
CO
§•
CJ
CO








o>
c
'co
£
CO
_
o
c
*

ra
.E
"3

"5
a.
£
CO
3
e
imics. When \
ad business.
c
O .££
•4- "5.
o E
1 "o
** Z
'c 5-
^ CO
O) ~^
S Q)
.2 CO
C -C
—1 	
Tips
We have had success in commi
chemicals/commodities that you


Arkansas
_c
oi
CD
CD
CD g1
si
"Jl
li 1
Q) C
"5 $
||

$ CO
i co
CO =
£ g;
09 CO

sfs
D D
C
CD CD

V— -W
^
0 o
CD *'
•0 O)
5 £
•S c
11
111
Q. O. 3
S CO °
S « g
£ > !i
!§ .2
15 co i_
f 1 CD O
U 0)*
>vi S
•I Iff
Ms
E I §
8*£
m CD ^
£ * £

|i|
co :s ~=
CO m CD
Barriers
Language is a major barrier to r
documents and program inform;
CA, small businesses often are


California








































a:


|| Colorado








































z

^
B-
Connectici








































or


1 Delaware























CO
.2
cf c
2 c
"co ^
1 1
1 S

-------
u. ®

4J. E
—I *5
OQ c



















TIPS/BARRIERS






<
§
O
o
(V
u.
OL


^
5
CO
£ s
S o
~ps o
CD ?*
• Q.
•*"" -» -
« §
? C
ll
it
.£ Q.
> CO
C »
® >
*- ts
03 m
S .2
£ CO
0 "5>
£-.2
5 «
! i
S o
CO H—
ie in HI. The Clean Air Branch, as well
ally established) to a great extent. The
er establishing a CAP.
3 2; >
CO | 0
'c -S I
co -o o
*Ss
Sow
co ^ "o
03 T3 CD
3 CO fc
_ i» — ^ Oj
Barriers
Appointment/establishment of CAP contir
program, currently uses advisory boards i
a CAP serves as a barrier (logistical and |





>
CO
I

























OL
Z





5
CO
2

























CK
Z




CO
"o
_c
-

J^
•co 2
CD £
'8 £
si
CO §
CD S5
^ CD
^r-
03 S .tS
-S CD >
3 "5 "•§
"0 01 OB
r* fll
~ £ o
03 CO °
§ 3 ®
- .2 to

X ^- CO
1 § 5
ill
E;S 8
•n ° Q
? CO W
nesses. In our guidance documents ai
regulations. This helps clarify the role
es an overview of the regulations on a
§ = 8
E ° ®
i. -c c
•Ml
8& =
i_ -g CO
CD <5 P
S3 S 5
I o I
•** \- m
Tips
SBAP is multimedia, which enables us to
rules and regulations when they tie into o
small businesses must work with and givi



CO
c
CO
'o
_c
s
• O
•o
o

To
1 1
~T> "
C 3
co •§
^ s
£* 3
.c •*
* 1
5 i
~ .co
o c
ff. O
CO ._
75 eg
"S3 P
•a o
4 =
H -a
CD
on how to complete a task are needed.
small businesses. Targeted and detail
ck of adequate training.
£2 5
TO ~~
1 1 §
I I §
i $ 2
> to
CO ^ CO
Q 03 o
•*i . c
Tips
For effective assistance to small business
are not enough to complete the program.
Generic guidance and workshops are not
consistently requested.
Barriers
Lack of resources and staff. Too many ai





5
|
o

m >^ CD -E

» § 1 0 1
o « S w -I
c « £ o -
in 0) CO _ CO
S £ « § - £
o £ J = § «
T= 0 5. CO = S
Q. a> 2 "5 c -o
< ,£ t! D) co c
Oic a.  -E * CD CO
££ | ® S 8
•a o o m * =
i i ^ Sj§ £
. . 03 — & .03
CO >s CO flj ,_ "t
-21 i I | §
3  c •»
0 -^ o > ^ -e
AP. Appointing authorities have many
rtance of maintaining an effective pane
ment of vendors in workshops/expositi
s highest at workshops or conferences
II now host a vendor exposition in conji
litiveness that vendors like with the "he
0 O 03 — '5 CD
^ Q. > CD > a.
S E "o « P S>
.> ~ > c e >-
•C 03 c « £ -5
jg£ rac g> =
» S ~ c S. =
c S .£ « Z" ^
zs j** rn ~t ft)
co fe .2 to = ?
o> c -Q !2 O £
.E -i ° S - o>
Barriers
We continue to have difficulty in maintain!
to be a priority, although we have tried to
members active.
Our program has experienced difficulty in
repeated on an annual basis. Small bush
other "regulatory driver" to get them there
environmental conference, thus combinin
the small businesses.



CO
CO
CO
^
CD
*

























CK



£
Q

,
£
0)
^

























a:
.|
0
o
c
o
2
03
£
V
"™5

CN
                                                                                                      I

                                                                                                      i

-------
u.

UJ
  C
to
ce.
ui
S
K
<
CO
35
o.
p
00
may impact smal
mental affai
envi
new developments
co
CO

S>
JD
CD


CD

£

o.
CD
CD
-X

•o

CD

Q.
<
O

CD



£
gs
quarterly mee
Tips

Hold

businesses.
<
K
(9
O
Of
0.
CO


CD
Tips

Since ou

services.
           CD


           "S
                    SIM
                       -~

                     cc
                     ills
                    I
                  S .; ^ -S f |
                   l! I!?!
                  i
                            111

                                    -


                      l|8|
                                   -  S

                     ftkff

                     Ilii!
                              ti
                              21
                               l

                                       !

                          i
                      i  11!
                            II
                    l

                               i!
                           fill!
                             Jiff
                             iifl!
CO
ro
!c
u
                                                  tc
                                                  z
                                                  a.
                                                  CO

                                                  "5
                                                  Z

-------
CO -O

ii   O
m
<  o





















CO
IU
TIPS/BARRI















5
a
c
a
a.














CO
CO
o.

CD $
C"
._ QJ
c £
03 CO
CD Q, .2
| § £ | 8
•c 5 c co .2
Q- co " .s= .23
T) i- CO CO CO
III i 1
^ CD •! i- r^
S fl= -2 .1
.9 °- 3! J= " -Q.
° e d § i 1 i
> 0 ® ^n ^~- nj
^TC ISq}3» m&*
03^ >^Og ^2
II 1 11 It 1 1
i § BSIsi 1 g
1 I i|!i! 1 s
03 ™ *jj? ^ (/3 Q {Q £
1 I § 1 i ^ 1 * 1 i1 -
Q. ^ 3 O 03 c 5 C tfl 0-
g S | f i 1 1 1 § |f
ifcl fit!!! i|fi
"cS ^" S ^ ^ *?• *^ Q3 O ^^
f II i s 1 1 1 j- fiif
*§c"t: "S^^S^Q-^ "aiP®^
com^ * w *^ to >*"^*£
|||||J|||S 1|||
I'SlI^oi'i'^'Si i -£ « 1 1
Q.C03OOS3CDCD3CDCO CO3^Ot
h-5Q-CLQ
O)
CO
CD
essment
CO
3
5
I
6
u_
o
"5
c
£
CD
C
1
£
II


•c
o
CO
.22
S






































o:


lontana
^






































a:
z


iebraska
z






































a:
z


(0
X
0
c
z


-------
LL.  §

UJ  C
-i  *;
ffi  c
(O

tu

cc
a:
<
m


I
H
              co

              CB
              CO
              C 0) O CO

              S i 5s
              £ CO JO £


                             ® o

                             ."2 .{2


                             1 £>
                             co o

                             Is.
CO*
Q. E


s*
CD CD

P-°

l!


«l
JC ®


II
SI
® O)
o .E
  aJ


  co
  Q.
                                        " R

                                    CO
                                    or
                                          CO

                                         I

                                          CO
                                                  CO
             CB

             5"
             o

             c

             S
             c
bette
                                                  CB



                                                  "5



                                                  §
                                         1
                                         1
                                         8
                                          o

                                          «
                                          0.
                                          <
                                          o
                                          CB
                                          §


                                          1
                                          "c
                                          co


                                          £
                                          CL-

                                          £ _
                                          CO CD



                                          "^
                                                  O)
                                                  s 8
           CO O) CO

           « £ c

           'E   '


                    8»g


                    « - ™

                    5.5f
                      2 =
                      E S«
ion
                                                 ro <£

                                                 to <=
                                                 CO
                                                 CO UJ

                                               eNtd
                                               l
                                                       T3
                                                       CO
                                               CO CO Q. 3

                                               CD 
-------
u.  §

UJ  c
—i ^
m  c




























' OS
0£
UJ
£
<
m
CO
Q.
p








5
<
K
O
§
Q.


|
•* T3
•s c
co co
1 «
a- CD
« ±i E
*; .- CD
w § TO
£ °- ?
^ ° i
So |
w ** *-
>* Q.
E J 5
o ~ en
"o  CD CO
O) C —
» I 2
i -o =
1 5 8
8 « o
CD CO CO
**7 D CO
0 CO 0
(b 5 o
0 cu
fi CD' 3
co .a "°
El 8
— CO j*
CO O C
CD a. JS
S s= ^
•= 'co
JJ CD CD
co 5. £
Q. o i—
« •= =
0 g 5
3 C **
0 CD CD
5* TJ E
31 8
£ •£ -c
CO CD (Q
Si =1
2 -2 IB
1 & ,1
Tips
To optimize your on-site assistance credibility, d
how inspectors think and what they look for.
Any mass mailings should be placed in an Agen
Barriers
Getting new CAP members appointed is slow.
Expanding the SBAP budget and moving to mull
state agency budget cuts.





o
lc
O
E" § =
Sf '»
>* § ?~
» ^s E
•c &> Ta
*= £ -S co
•= > 0) 3
o> _ S? 3
3 CO CD g
2 .£2 c 0)
;-^go
SH g>S
•g eo' 2 g,
9« C > QJ
1 -2 S S
5 CO o. CD
"co "> „•=
w -— o +*
eo -0 — c
c° >. ~o £
JC CT CD g
OT S 15 *~
•^ m ?X *>^
^ ^ .a ?
1— 3 T3 E
O) CD O
^T CD -O C
>* i— o
o ... co S
C CD — "3
CD £ "S CO
£i£3
0 5 £T co
£ CO < g
/— in m •—
l-ico ro
= CD ,„ CO
S E Sf
= C 3 K
-20-§^
« .SS c ^
> o — U
3 -g | =
g -a §. £•
U r~ •*-
'? § §• 2j
L_ j j
CD CO o ~O
CO fe fee
CD p CO -0
E i co g
2 E co «
05 u_ jr co
3 fc •*- CD
o 2 B =
CD co - 'w
I 3T:H-i
C -^ CO 0
Tips
Our program has benefitted from being housed i
to develop relationships and make in-roads with
approach to regulatory agency organization - th
technical assistance and regulatory assistance t
allows us to network internally.



CO
o
CO
^
0
£>
§
c
CD
CD
.a
CO
CO

CO
ja
=
§
_c
t?
CD
w
E
S
*-
CD
.>
1
CD
CO
£




CO
CD
CO
CO
CD
_cz
'co
JQ
—
1 i
» |
° • $
CO CO 2C
2-s S£ o
o E .£ E
** * 'ti -ri
>» Q. & S
Si 3 -i
> CD CO CO
•o -o co w
O CD CO £
0 CD CO JO
Tips
BAP has found that working with suppliers is a g
helpful in referring customers to BAP that may n
BAP currently is working on a project with fibergl
When working with dry cleaners, information is ti




c
Q
O

O










































EE

CO
'c
CO
>
>,
CO
c
c
CD
Q.










































cc
•z.




E
o
•c
CD
3
Q.










































Cf.

•o
C
CO
JO
CD
TJ
O
.C
CE










































IE
CO
_c
"Q
£
CO
O
^
"3
o
CO










































K.

3
0
j«;
CO
Q
£

CO
CO

-------
SI
J "^
QQ C
< .9

























TIPS/BARRIERS







(9
O
•^
QL.


























§
~u
to
•a
CD
g
SE
w
CO
o

1
CD
« cn
Q. C
~ 1
E J
§>£
S fO
Q. S
°1
-C 0
eral support.
on confidentiality.
1 standardized approac
n among assistance pri
•o c. co o
& o g :•=
e -5 is = ®
•g £ » 2 |
CO 8 §=0 I
m Jj _j 2 o
CD
O
CO
CO
V
C
c
CD
1
CO
O5
c
8 .a 12
c -r**
c 1 S ®
J .J £ "I
15. t a> 3
c O "O c
^f* C E
8  H :§ ^
c ^* co M*
"S JS "c 'X E
*— (O 3 ^i m
e ™ E .2
^j^ T3 C 03 O
3 CO T3 fe
*- 30 W °-
ID *- -. CD T3
Z ° 0 c «
1 8 S 1 S &
® c S g> f -2
~ •§ •" £ f- -o
(— 'co co ro Sj ^
« s t 1 i »
c 8 « « - o
CO C » fl) «: -t-*
•~ to **~ o ~^ »»
£2. ~ O c CT -S
E °- * « .£ ^
lilt 1 !
fill I 1
•S I CD 1 | | 1
1- 1 1 i i il *
^0fl)cO2 Sin &*
CO ^ O o CD m S •*•* c5
i ° 1 5 | | | t 1
i f ! £ c § 1 ^ I
8s-ia2 5 Sf o §
= ?$ra|S -sSlc<
?S S 1 1 ! o 3| f &
1! H i 1! I S! ! i
it i 1 I Is i i| 1 I
•™ ^~ O {ij O CD ^ ^ CO ^
Z- S 1, S 5'"|-a o5-o|,i 8
gro £ c c ^§ go- ci^ ^ "5
S.^co £ £ £ ^^ £-c "SE o o
._ CDcO CD CD CD CDC CO*- £1 Q m m
I-O_CD 05 co c/> a_a> mO coo _i _i


CO
CD
X
£
































a:
•z.



_
fS
5

1 1
"c °-

S. 8
0 o
co -°
D —
O ">
 5
^°
5 £
Q eo
^
< 2
o: J
o f0
K 5
f?
|s
CO (i)
II
crossover in requireme
irements to small busin
J8I
° s
*• CD .
CO CD i CO £
O. 3 CD •«-
i- Q £ 5

"cz
o
c
L_
>

-------
« -o
u.  §
UJ  C





















; ••


ARRIERS
S
W
a.
.",*-







5
flf
§
f^
UB
a.





o

~JZ
CD
13
CO
CO
•o
o
^
.§
CD
>
O

CO
CO CO
0) 'to
O CD
k a
OJ C
'§ C
"to o
S°
	 to

3 2-
» w
C f
o a
fe »
t process, could make money available
hampered the ability to provide on-site
C CD
2 §
ra .C

|^ 1
£2 1
So. co
r- Q. C
o> * 8
= to "
O O Cu
t C (A P
- .2 fe3
1^1 li
H LU ro m tr



CO
c
E5

























CD
.££
S
i
CO
CO
to
CO
to
O)
1
1
1
Q.
CD
£
O3
^3
I
CL
CO
"tc
cc
2 -5"
CD °
1 "
S5
(0
"O
JO
CO

_c
^

































a:

c
"c
c
^
a:
5

































CU

"c
e

a

a.
o
CD ^
>
2 C £,
to — «
•= E —
| E -g i
- o c §
.C a. c ni
1 « 1 1

^^ C "^ ®
§ "o ® §

•= -0 1 n
? w o -2
3 CO :j3 •'g

| 1 1 8
' C | 1
2 co £ co
g -o w E
CD -e w s?
.£ £ co a5
_ m ^£ fc
^ ._ LU O
-*-1 cz *^
— CO C CO
"S " CO 3
«i C CJ
CO CD "3 CD

•- S ^ 2 oS
1 I E 1"
fill ll
LZC * 0 1 ^ i| ^
^ i^ ^- o CD 1^ C


c
"to
c
8
CO
5


CO
C O!
CO .C
"O -=
o> <5
•o E
1 .i1
Q- "a co
"c "5 *
ro .E •§
__ ^
15 . co o
§0^ 1 &
to < £ CD
.52 CQ co "
2 w -g J
c ~o M_ "55
s « 2 s
« CO ® CO
§ Q- ^ i-
L. tf E ®
SO g£
O » "^ C
CO ^ £ =
0 i TJ •§
CD O) CD o
CO c x: co
3 
-------
   (O
   LLI
   O
   CO
   HI
   CO

l
   (0
   (0
   (0
   (0
   LU
   O
   O
   D
   (0














CO
Ul
Q
SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE STU
S
<
fy*
1^
O
o
ce.
Q_


















(£.
Z


CO
CO
.Q
CO
<
>^
a
CO

S
CD
5
><
CD
£
CO
CO
i
"Z
3
a
I
0)
1
co
1
CO
0)
<-
Only assisted one small company this past year to obtain a permit to operate a crusher it
with the assistance provided.


CO
^
CO
CO
<
•D
C
2
CO
!r CD
i?
c 5
« ^
EQ
~
>. CO
l!
*- ffl
Wiv
-a
c a;
•~ ••••»
•tS _CD
§2
m
&?
.t CO
co a>
c -Q
cl
If
J-i
fi-i
The number of general permits now available to small businesses has improved their abi
ADEQ Air Quality Division has excellent stakeholder participation in the rulemaking proa
the requirements early on in the process.


CO
o
N
•c
<















o:
>*
0
S.
8
CO
^—
«>

c
•* ? 0
^ -C O
0 H T
Q- 3
co" jg °
CD ro m
C tS ™
R O 0
° .C 3
§ £«
••= c s
co 5 CB
to 2-2
co f £
s S*
D) C C
een effective in helpin
igulations.
tually fly into the semi
ations, and Departme
We have had a great deal of success with our small business loan program, which has b
producers, dairy farmers, cattle ranchers, and radiator shops meet their environmental re
We have also hosted some very exciting aerial applicator seminars in which the pilots ac
purpose of these seminars is to educate the pilots on pollution issues, storage tank regul
program.


CO
03
CO
CO
-£
<
5 | a,
- 8 § "S08-
•5 CD S > a> aj
1 .£ 1 i .£ 75
CO § 0) Egg
. is < s 3 y

±- -Q >• CD m CD
13 •> Q. E - "a
PI ill
Making the information received free and confidential encourages the business communi
businesses can't always be expected to know what the environmental requirements are.
feel comfortable that they are operating within the rules. Many small businesses want to
think in terms of both the environment and the "bottom line."
As a local example, the county of Ventura Compliance Assistance Office holds "green tei
Ventura County. These meetings include all agencies involved, such as the Fire Departr
Safety, etc. We explain to the prospective business the various regulatory requirements
permitting process. Many SBAPs in CA follow such a path.


03
0
»t—
"co
O

CO
DL CD .c
< £ CO
ffi « "8
CO :=: O
Q. -^
£ E 75
8 o E
M- o ~:
(E CD £
C o CD
CD .S
3M flj
C ,,: O
s 1.1
•X ~o "5.
discovers a source thi
id in a matter of a few
i of time to attain com
We have a process we call "enforcement intervention." When the enforcement program
assistance, they refer the source to SBAP. Some compliance problems have been solve
problems were solved through Compliance Agreements that allowed a business a margii
yielded positive results with minimal cost and effort.


o
T3
S
o

















cr
z


1
1
f-
c
o
0















K.
Z


£
i
CO
CD
Q

-------
LU  C
-I S
CD  C




















'-.-
to
,iu
Q
•^
£
Ul
«\
<
o
a
z
, <
CO
iU
1
CO
to
Ul
o
o
CO



<
K
0
o
t£.
a.



CO
>> 5
.0 0
1 "5
1-
§«
£ S
CD '55
5 i
CD O
5 c
c *
o -g
_ CO
3 •=
f^ "^
iJ ^S
1?
=5 §
W j
i- CT
(0 CD
"O CO
c .a
CD 3
15 «
U CD
ra >
"c ^^
m f~
a t
O CO
LU
ts
w o
CD CD
£o
"o i"
° c
I >
to ^
2 S
year. As a
alternative :
shments.
ccess is the publication of outreach materials this
ry cleaning establishment regarding the use of an
iformation to share with other dry cleaning establi
3 -a •—
CO «
sis
o ° £


°1
•= i
^ 3
.2 0
Q O





















8 ^
m 0
CO o
•5. CM
E ra
o .£
o t
g CO
S c
.1 |
o .co
S*" S
co a
| 5
1 ?
CD £•
•- 2
over 2,400 calendars to dry cleaning/laundry sen
uted human and animal crematory fact sheets.
cle describing the SBAP as a FL DEP "Success S
•D J3 -f
= S CO
w « c
2 Q <



CD
•a
'C
o
UL


































<
2


CD
'S5
o
CD
O



"o
>,
jff
2
<
CO
c
0
'•§
CD
•-
0}


r~
CD
.C
c
s
.>
O)
•a
CD
*-«
*^i (O
S5 S
§2
»-g
8 -i
•— st
11
CD .C
Js 'i
£ aj
,r- ±±
o E
3 O3
« ,
CO CO
>1
II
- Multimedia dry cleaning calendar.
Ability to gain trust with targeted industry represei
BAP to secure future reduction in air fees for "de i
Q. - 22
< 00
CO CD DD
CO CO CO



:co

CD



































a:
z



o
f-
cc
2































iuccessful.
the enforcement schedule has been particularly s
•5
CD
ID
3



CO
6
c
?^
CN
                                                                                                                              S
                                                                                                                              Q.

-------
uui
-J  *:
ffi  c















CASE STUDIES
SUCCESS STORIES AND '
<
K
O
O
OZ
Q.
CD
T3

s?
g
^

CO
.C

1
E
0
g
"o
D
"O
P
emissions i
CD
O5
"S
O
T3
if
1
T3
Wood furniture - A well-received newsletter was sent to IN's wood furniture in
to the NESHAP and implementation of P2.



CD
C
CD
1
•§ £
? 8
w O
••551
T> £€
m
05 CD 'tf
CO .> c
£03 *
(ft ^^
8 §t
« 35J
5 E -
. o °
J2 4= Q.
CO .G _
1^1
-C > —
.— «5 C
i S S
CO a) £
CD s to
f 1 S
2 J S
c "- to
CD "O CD
jildings for environm
ght bulbs. We helpe
3urdue University to
Childcare - We continue to help childcare facilities that wish to assess their bi
recycling efforts in childcare facilities, especially the recycling of fluorescent li
use to Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs and provided a grant to 1
facilities.





— to
CO C
E CD co
fpt ^ O
to ^^
M §>
2 g co
o. 5s
CO 
JC to  .~
CD °
0 TO
ffl S
li
35
to co
co —
® E
IS
1-
Is
leir Industry and offei
ronmental Recognita
Metal finishing - We provided metal finishers with a multimedia approach to th
be encouraged to go above and beyond the regulations when the 5-Star Envi





n
o^o
O3 "*"^
3? -£ ®
k * ~
CN o *—
O C
>» s "~
^ S =
CD m CO
^ CO C
CO O
££ a
S " §
111
Q. « §
£-8 "
f OS
i«Tf
lo§>
to - [S
g S TO
l£ E
s to be our most pop
rticipating in the proc
mostats are properly
HVAC - The Mercury Thermostat Recycling and Reduction Program continue
IN's heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractors and suppliers are pa
with the Thermostat Recycling Corporation to ensure mercury-containing ther
three for thermostat collection and recycling.





CD
jr

CO
ex
2
3
o
S
j™
u?
o
CO
.CD
'o
•S
£
CO
o
"co
CD
•o
CO
Pledge for hospitals
Hospitals/health care - In Fall 2000, we introduced the IN Mercury Reduction
voluntary elimination of mercury-containing items.





















OL
Z




CO
1
CO
 2


 i

 CE

-------
1U  C
—I  tc
ffl  c
<  °
P  o





SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE STUDIES



S

£
C
o
a.
"o .22
_ r-

to £ •Q *= §,
3 10 ^ 2 0 « CO CD •? j° £
ggj "§i- 5s| |l
i y-co ««? £?£ g^
^ S g 75 i i -g«c ag
ci E to ° a (5 »j ro a35
£ s "° * ® £ ® -2, 1 "if
~nr i_ ^3 "ts • »^. en « co rx *—
g KDHE, 8 cities in KS with pre-treatment programs, and CMP council on E
related efforts, such as arranging speakers at state conferences on CMP p
ducational workshops and outreach in the Wichita area resulted in about 7
messes that recover silver and mercury.
ilishment and growth of local safety and environmental networks throughoi
id safety staff the opportunity to discuss issues and learn from one anothei
>gram partnered with the Office of Local Government at KS State Universitj
employees and extension agents.
liver a workshop for metal finishers and electroplaters. This was part of a li
Regulators discussed with attendees the regulations to which they were s
tives and businesses only to provide them an opportunity to freely ask que
agenda structure.
s or businesses that can benefit one another. One example of this is a cas
week of a specialty plastic waste that had been landfllled in the past. Addit
cycling and reuse.
lit mi Pli !i!
i-iit ti I Hi ii
III! i IS Mil lit
ojj).±±a. .Eo.c.2 CDCUO X-SP
Ooca.c Ocol Scctoo OSt




in
CO
CO
O)
c
'C
3
i/as distributed d
>
iw success stories with assistance from KBEAP, the CAP, and DAQ, which
a second pamphlet of ne
prepared
m
£§
9°
< CM




|
'c








£
"c
C
O
c
2
1
CO
ta 
-------
u_
Ul
CQ  C












SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE STUDIES
S
£
o
i
n
bfe

CD
O _
CO (0
c s
.2 -2
5 °
S o>
to -p
CD ^
Q. S
1 i
> CO
5 s
CO C
CD CO
% "
i %
"55 B
5 S
The office chairs an EMS Roundtable, which meets monthly. The Roundtable provides a forum for
EMS process, practices, and success stories, and to discuss issues of concern.
OTA aided a local town with the design of a hazardous materials bylaw and provided on-site techni
businesses to help them comply.
3
"CD
CO
D
JZ
O
CO
CA
a,
CO
s
•£
£ S i i o
.ra £ "5 o "c
^ JK -— *^ 03
W O M. (5-
m _Q c *w e
*-;=•" .= 13 .b
CO £ 0) T3 C CO
*3i ill
„: S co 0-0-5
J&s si?
-C -O 3 O CD .£
en ?^ ra is >
1 5 | S * J
5 To •£ "5.J9 *
in *^i
TO r eo. ! 5 en
-?7f = •*p— C *i m
S^= CD E i
w g-a S..Q «=
Jg E Q. u- 3 c
os 0 -35 o co -E
TO u J= c c 2
00-, 0 0 m
Workshops - SBAP continues to receive both tremendous attendance and feedback from its techni
comments from attendees focus on how well the presentations are organized, delivered in a "how t
breadth and depth of knowledge about the subject. SBAP also received general comments on hov
workshop participants in that they can easily understand their compliance requirements.
Technical assistance - SBAP staff have worked with various types of industries regarding submissi
specific direction and review of permit application information to ensure a complete permit applicati
with industry to resolve violations of permitted activity, saving businesses tens of thousands of doll;
these funds in new economic development projects within the state.


CO
0}
Ic
o
2












u.
•z.

CO
"5
ta
CD
C
C
2












CC.
•z.

'5.
Q.
'eo
co
'co
CO
2
.22
.CD
"5
Q.
u.
'CD
ico
._ *—
•7? co
CJ r
S-8
£1
if
co .<£.
21
^1
co -p
> 0
•o i
to =
is
Our On-site Assessment Team performed an assessment for an aluminum smelting facility, which \
and cardboard. We located a cardboard recycling facility, and the smelter has saved about $2,000


•c
13
o
CO
co
is












o:
z


CO
s
o
2












tr


CO
^
CO
CO
£
CD
Z












a:
z


CO
•a
CO
1













CC
Z
£
!c
CO
a.
E
CO
CD
Z
5 « §|
K ? 8 CD ^ CO'
. 2 C £ T3 a?
o -= n ~ c i
snip
w ^ ^ f
C T3 ° £ CD d>
5s|tfi
"S S «o .0 B J2
?f 1>88°
> QJ ^ t TD
CO 0 IV O ^ C
B 1 T: « co «
CD - CD CD te ^
C < C m S CO
S n CO ?• m 3
8 fe^ 0 CD 8
§ £ 0 'CO 0 *
o ra £.0 £, |
i |o >-o c
0! J= T- m 0 co
With funds from the national EPA grant, SBAP/SBO produced a 7-minute video and public service
video is being distributed to trade/business organizations, SBDCs, chambers of commerce, etc. Tl
been mailed to all other states and territories. The grant also allowed the program to have the 200
Assistance Calendar to be translated into Korean. The program shared both the English and Kore;
to all states and territories. Both versions of the calendar were distributed in late 2000 to over 1,80
dry cleaner associations. The grant also allowed the production of a program logo and banner, plu
Rolodex cards, Dens, cups, flyers, pamphlets, etc.) for workshops, conferences, etc.

£•
£2
CD
1
Z

-------
UJ
^





SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE STUDIES
S
DC
O
O
DC
£L








Z

C
X
a
5
CD
Z
£ g "S o. o
il;!ii! it! IS! ill
§ c -3 a "is a « ••= » -ri 1-Tsb ctos
111 l|s if!
flj .+3 O) O w © Q. CO « O 2 £ cp= 4-1 S^
tiiii^i ill in fji
IHfll! P.I. ||| |||
>\ W -O JT ((j UJ -» js £r .J Q5 CO ^ *5
Over the past several years, dry cleaning operations that use perc have come under increasing scrutin
implemented regulations for perc dry cleaning operations that went beyond federal NESHAP regulation
to perc vapors due to co-location of dry cleaners with residential housing (apartments) and commercial
evaluating alternative solvents, SBAP discovered that a new solvent, DF2000, had been introduced to
solvent contains almost no Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) and has a flash point above 140F. SBAP
representatives who were evaluating petroleum dry cleaning operations for possible regulation under N
category indicated that this industry sector was not a major HAP source and recently announced its inti
future NESHAP regulations.
In addition to the new solvent, advances were made to the dry cleaning machines that use this solvent
The new machines are closed loop and incorporate fire prevention technologies, such as oxygen sense
(to remove air from machines to reduce oxygen content), and hydrocarbon and/or temperature monitor
this alternative compliance option via newsletter articles, hotline calls, and workshops.
NYSEFC also is involved in implementing the NYS 1996 Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act, which includ
assistance to small businesses that must comply with NYS environmental regulations. This Bond Act r
numerous cleaners who decided to convert their operations to DF 2000, which is better for the environr
customers, and neighbors.
Working with SBAP staff and the DEC Regional Office, SBEO assisted a business engaged in restorinc
overall HAP emissions by 5 tons per year and in obtaining a Minor Facility Registration. By substituting
solvent, the business also avoided being subject to the Halogenated Solvent Cleaning NESHAP, benef
and the administrative burden associated with the NESHAP and hazardous waste generation.


|

CD
Z

explained the
are the entire
£•8
£ .0
c I
C CD
SQ.
_ a.
g) co
a£
•— £
co en
3?
O £
We assisted a dry cleaner who had received a Notice of Violation and civil penalty assessment from a 1
intricate details of the perc dry cleaning NESHAP to the supervisor and won a reversal of the violation t
Board.
CO
c
1
CO
o
€
o
z






(£.

j<
CI
€
c
z

"5
•c
SL
05
u- CO
° §
O
CD J2
£ <°
-a 52
ives, reduce
leir custome
r fc
SBO provided financing for CAA compliant equipment for small businesses and, through state tax incei
compliance. Three major vendors of dry cleaning equipment and four vendors of paint booths now tell
their sales pitch.



o
IE
O
                                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                                                         I
                                                                                                                                         «0
                                                                                                                                         o

-------
 .

y  =
—I V
CO  c
















CO
UJ
a

to
UJ
to
<
u
a
z
SUCCESS STORIES ft




s
^
O
2
^
a.



"- •«
« c
- c
2 1 1
i= £ S
S £ 5
•2 c ,_ o
co as = p
5 ic|
-. Sa£
8 1 ai
•2 « !" -0
5 ISS
i -S ao
* 1SJ
£ fe aj 5
CQ ^^ rs i
3 0 > 03
T3 O .£ 3;
•> " -o w
15 .2 £ ^
C 'C TO c
'm CO C 3
1 3-.S-8
£ " 8 §
1 S 8-J-
* *- 8
03 *** O) Q.
£ § .£ co
„ C C TO
2 ~ o § 5
i- t: 5 o ,-
5 0 C3 g- 0
1 £• * - ^
2- a 2 « *.
to have great success with our site visits. As a program, we
see their processes, and provide assistance from this vanta
we embarked on an innovative metal finishing program whe
ither RCRA or air) with each facility. They were notified of It
<\chievement Program. If they elected to participate, the ins|
§ c e - § «
C CO ° C 9 O
:= O o c C
•£ CO CN ~ .« TO
o 23 — o •= =
« ~ "TO ® g- Q.
u =lii


TO
E
Q

^
ff*
w
^
O




























f£



c
Q
C33
OB
c
o
TO 0 JS „
TO £ = - ?
g « £ ^ TO
£ 5 ±i
&03» 25| C03 CD
S-w5 ncS oo> :."
10 c .2 -s — TO -S c o ®
= JTO iefe 85 S»
•S^-o ro^2c ="0 t3p
Q-C-r "-=03 Q." m
TOO co'-cn Q.O 2"0
ccS® «£>« «£ -it,
•Kc^ Q. o S ®o coir
1«S H^S «ig 2|
CCD— "-«-3 PC 03CO
I i g s | o- |E gg
°>»P) 0)S^ ** *= 030)
Q ^* L. C;^^ ^^^-^ ^-C
111 |l! 1! i!
•=jc« i -fc E "^ 53
^—^ rooco "S'o 3o
118 E^S »^ ||
111 Iff 1! 1
xco £= "'E TO"
| & £ sS^ ^8 g |
2|^ ^^8 15 -I
5^-0 5 -o " ^£ 5£
TO-S-g oJS£ £>i 58
ScufS >J=^ 5-jT .fc °
D5^lp >^^X >O- O5fl3
ooc te-S'c: 0)°- ^^
•K.!r= TOS.2 c50 — —
E>° •ffiy-ffi » TJ "S-D
_CCJ m.TOTO TO-S ° CD
TO UJ £ Q.1*- 3 0 g >, C
£-0. ®JS) ° § SS
±± ±± ±f- _r- £ 03 (0 ^ CO O
Scoflj -ft — >- -S.- ^ *;
iries of hotline calls and a site visit, Envirohelp staff worked \
i the short timeframe required by PA DEP. During the site vi
egulations except for odors and fugitive emissions. Enviroh
' hotline calls and subsequent review of the draft form, Envin
ation. In the course of the assistance, Envirohelp found thai
ste. Envirohelp informed the owner of the hazardous waste
sensed hazardous waste haulers.
liture manufacturer was considering thinning their 100% soli
being informed of the numerous air pollution regulations the
orked with a copper finishing operation to determine whethe
aste, residual waste, or coproduct regulations. Envirohelp ir
lim for the wastes to be considered coproducts.
g = - -B^TO- | fe 5.5,™
TO g o co Q-f "a £% Q. a, «
_.2 s= oo.(o,S (n't "53^.2
•S, « 3 •=«5fl1- g j=°ra
ji-g S-||| e&j fil|
la? slii cs i?Sf
I-TOTO SQ.EJ: 
^
CO
1C
c
03
Q.




























QL


o
o
ir
o

o
3
Q.




























o:
z

T3
TO
ta
03
•a
o
.c
D:




























D:
z
TO
C
1
TO
O



O
CO




























£T

JS
^
-iC
TO
Q

.c
"3
O
CO

-------
u.  §

*H .£
—I *!
CO  C










CO
UJ
,-•3

CO
SUCCESS STORIES AND CASE
S
a
o
te.
a.



co
CD
1 S
to .E
CD
^g 05
£ «
CD £
® -^
S -o
i :-
Q. -0
CD 3
a. m

to o
SBAP developed a te
>e very cost effective.
n newsletters, payche
~ o c
CO •*•* O
® -n =
Dry cleaners were having problems passing a new dry cleaner Superfund program 1
Dry cleaners are now passing the test.
Energy workshop generated local newscast coverage. Mass media outreach provei
Workshop announcements are on our web page. We developed articles for publica

CD
CO
CO
CD
c
CD
h-
L_
£ >
£ 'S r- o-o
CO > £ i_ »* CD
£ « <& >, | £ 3!
11 1 i 1i i i!
0 £ •« "0 — {55 1 §0.
*- *o = ¥ £ c ® % ^
1-1 i « s 2 f 8> CD
cog *- .>• 7: 15 § .= -o
CD (Q .£2 "Q CD £ > ^t 03
&i£ i ". "! 4 If
c 5 o <5 2 ^ £ c
5 •• **"* ^ f^ 5R *~ « CD
°! 1 ! Hi I<
I! 1 I if f II
«£ £ « t.-oS •=•>
•5 iS co "g « CD jE -| '-5
I! ii 1 II 1 If
la lg| 1 1 § i &
i- (D ® C »Orn m fl5
«C EPo S-T=P S?
Assisted owner of a rock crushing operation that was found to be in violation of air p
air permit, but was unable to hire a consultant to do the work. We matched the busi
the permit application, thus avoiding further enforcement action.
The City of Dallas is working on redeveloping the Trinity River Corridor. Our progra
owners with their environmental obligations if they decide to locate in the redevelopi
By providing proactive assistance on what is required to remove lead-based paint fr
removal and disposal costs, and a potential violation was avoided.
Our program sponsored and marketed a Permanent Pollution Prevention Program v
University campus. Seventy-nine people representing 21 companies and plants pai
Program staff contacted more than 200 industries as part of the metal finishing/platii
50% were incorrectly identified as a metal finisher or plater.
A rural school district needed an OSSF permit for a new building and did not unders
between the office of the local state representative, the local regional director, and tl
implemented with approval of permitting.


co
CD
X
CD
I-














o:
z


r-
CT

^


CD
Q.
O

1
0
co
CO
CO
8
0
n 2001 that covers sui
JB

"co
I have not had time to put success stories together, but will host an area of the web
incorporate a quote from customers on each web page.


o
l^
CD


t
o
E
"8
O)
Ico
§ 8
•o '>
» |
"^ -Q
O QJ
outreach workshops I
registrants and provid
•o £

r*t >
Formed a partnership with the VA Department of Minority Business Enterprise to prt
businesses. Conducted 1 workshop, the second was postponed, but made contact


.2
O)
^
>
CD
1
1
•o

C
to
CD
1
ra
c
E
CD
1
CO
o
£
2

E
We are providing assistance to our automobile and refinishing shops, as we see the
convinced all refmishinq shops of the need for a spray booth.
CO
JO
V)
.c
n)
,~
>
CO

-------
f -a
0.  «

UJ  C
-I «=
CD  c









STORIES AND CASE STUDIES
SUCCESS





S
<
ec
o
o
K
°~
















z


c
o

_c
CO
CD


1 . 8
cc €5 E
JI D 5= CD
J^ U- >% Q-
*1 ® -
•| E .2 ID -2
£O """ > C
P ffi o .2
ing stack testing pursuant to a Consent Order. During SBAP's
uded in the facility's stack test protocol received by OAQ Enfoi
Dermit or the Consent Order. Testing for dioxins and furans we
as issued. This saved the client between $2,000-$3,000.
tween a small business owner and DEP. Corrective action inv
underground storage tanks) that proved to be a win-win situat
wner and DEP both saved substantial costs in legal fees.
a client who was conduct!
oxins and furans was inci
not a requirement of the |
sed stack test protocol w<
ving an 8 year conflict be
evious removal of leaking
tion, the small business o
-a '-a  o Q. —
Q\ u_ CD O CO ^ o
•55 o 5 *~ £ 2 «>

co .£ !c "^ — 3 •«
In December 2000, SBAP i
situation, we noted that tes
investigation revealed that
testing company in error, ai
SBO played an integral rok
groundwater remediation (c
involved. Due to this confli

CD
"£

E?
>
"53
5
cc
£
Imm
*^ ^
T3 ^
O .C
03 M
> 0>
ti O
CO p
body repair shops became effective in 2000 in the Wl administ
body shops will not have to deal with the air pollution permit pi
ermit exemption for auto 1
, thousands of small auto
Q.  c- .£

o 5 o •- ^
community set up a waste wood composting program instead
bio-fuel powered electrical generating plant to use their waste
lowmobile Challenge design competition. Sponsored by the S
Departments of numerous universities around the world to des
ions and noise. We will continue our engagement in this activi
'aste wood projects. One
possibility of setting up a
opportunity, the Clean Si
allenges the Engineering
3s, both in terms of emiss
5 2 f "S =i
-o £ <" -°
CO j=? CD CD E ^
£'•= c O > S
m fc C o CO
Work continues on waste ti
wood. A business is evalu;
powering their operation.
Additional work continues c
American Engineers, this p
environmentally friendly sm
^ears through our P2 progr




ra
'E
o
5

-------
        APPENDIX G
COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE ISSUES

-------
CD
CD
>
0
CO
CO
CO
£
0)
2
Q_
0>
o
c
-2
_"OT
CO
CO
1
O
0)
i 1
3 £• .
I II
f^ O >*
V Q CD "w
UJ < C li
"* -J T3 *-
^ s co "5
H 5 co o
O CD 'f
0 -£ ro
z -D Q.
i & t
2 O CO
2 i c
0 co ~
0 gi
c SJ
f 1
E CD
o 2:
o CD
c ^
O co
E E
E ®
J2 Q.
o c
"co
o -c
CD
"S ^
S Jt
CO CD
CO -*
£.S
5 .E
co o
DL ~
"1
OQ -^
CO CO
-.-,-'• | :
* . - * -?
- ^ -' > ' ~

- ; -'./,.'"
t" ' ' JO. ' ,
l..;
£•5'. Si o'5'
• ^^i'"

0^:2*1
S S c- S 8>'i-
£ '3 ^^ ^^ fc»
? ™ >S c
-;1r.;,',':"' -*. ;--"':

« •» 75 "='
• ii}sif :
;/||||-
0 '" .; ' " " .

f": " '•'
, - ^
n*f
-•,..;.
£o*-|l
: |f f|f| -.-,
5* 8-- 1 1
. > '

w i-.
I ill Ifl
~
, * _ > •-. .
|f| -of =
•e, ^ £ — S S §
lit ;•*.«

•s»
•52
£ o
§ *
,~ "
ii*
s.^ ®
O a °-


ra „
~ g> c
Iflf
i £

£
1
CL


























X








X














X



<












X













X

















X





X



<












X





X







X




X



X




X









X



s


























X




X



X




X


*
*I!
2
CO




X


ra
5












X









1
"1

1
xl
(0



_O)
x|
(O



X




X



X





X



o:

X





X




X





X
X



X


X




X



X




X



X





X



o


























X




"1






c
a
01
X 0
fr








X



o
o


















































IT
z



o


















































z



lil
Q


















































rr



8












X





X




X


X




X



X




X









X



_J
11.












X













X




X



X



i
x T3
•o

xll

•g 'a




X



O


-------
      •mil

       *i i
       f "2*1
O §
CO
:•*••
           -g.
        I
        e  «

        11
                 f
X


ry clean


ood furn.
                         al
                         .11
                                                CM
                                                o:

-------
o §
UJ C
       5

 o
P
        ,,
   Wli
 •tl
       8 s
       = e
      III
     .III
     z £ 3 1
      m
                           t
                       1
                      x >••
                        •&
                        8
                            =
n
y
X
dry cl
auto b
                                    co

-------
O §

111 C
         f  i
         £  g 3

          i-ii  I
             £ a

Ifll
 m
trip
                       §
                                            Mil
                                           1
                                           •a
                                           1
                                           1  »
                                           S fr^
                                           5 -5 _
                                            c To -a  as
                                            S 8.E i. S
                                            CO J_ "T "O RJ
                                            ! = !§§•
                                            e «> i s n
                                                               •o

                                                                        s
                                                                        1

-------
6 §
UJ C
_j z:
ffl c
         £ * ?s,|
         felfrf
         •slit
         ; *- a O"'
         ru
•§;y,«"i..f|'
ft ill I
          I l| «
         Hi  ir
o «
lS
            111
                        _eo
                            13 '
                            f

                                  III!
                                  w o « 'r
                                  0) O = CO
                                  CO *- (D ^
                                 ^ i 11 <"


                                 111 ^ »
                                         z > x
                                         5 2 O
                                                              IO
                                                              o
                                                              2
                                                                     1

-------
CD
11
O. ^~
o £
*^ cn
Si
11
CD Q.
S £
IE
_CO CD
CO o>
CO P
E Q.
S-cc
0) 3
2 S
Q- .>
T3
co £
.CB CD
•o y
o C
c co
e-»
41 ig
3 «
=C CO
CD .2
Q. C
£-§
CD CD
(0 — g
UJ co .E
co -c ~o
•s* >
T =0 0 1 1
0 § §5 l£
!3£ ^ |i
ffl 5 i 0-3
i
£ 8
o c
15= O
'o E
8-1
" 8
c <2>
CD .E
i- 13
£ co
•o ex
05 £
"en co
co •£
£ |
i 1
1 8
SCO
1_ >
§>sl
Q: 8,5

















CO
til

CD
£
L_
1
CO
g
S*'

CD
Q.
° £
i "§
- CD
03 "
ng, recordkeepir
i rules for certair
? 1
Q. C
ffl '35
i_ fO
"S^
.1 E
•Q. CO
§TJ
0)
0 S
it
1 "
s?
11
ill businesses !
consider deve
£2
OT =1
2^
^1
Q. D-
CO UJ
"co ^i.
•C O
4^ SL
NESHAPs
to name tv
*- TJ
CO o
li




CO
o
N
5

£•
CO
.g
5
to
c
CO
"c"
o
ffl
ts
CO
_eo
•a
E,
03
2
•D
SS c
•p o
1 £
CO O
c £

55 .22
.2 co
1 1
T3 U-
S ^
1 s
: i
03 ?\
.-i y
co .2
c
C CD
Recordkeeping is poo
j is still too lenient on <
c
CO CO
1 ^
^ E
C CD
8 °-
1 s
E co
CD -2
£ °
o o>
£ i
I !
i co
Z *
° s
i5 ^
1 i
5 s
i &g
co Q y
•2 = 3
co O S

>,
0
CD
Q.
O
O
•^
CO
2





•"I
CD
Q.
CO
L.
Q
>S
c
CD
i*_
0
CD
O)
"8
UJ
C
5
"5
_*
o
JO
CD
Ol
CO
3
a
co"
CD
.0
£
a.
jo
3
O
'•c
CO
a.
£
CO
O)
;l
CD
a.
£
Q.
t_
"co
•D
CO
CO
c
O
to
iwater regu
t
0
CO



co
CO
CO
CO


J£
1 < I
« « e E
O3 jc 3? CD
C ±5 CD -Jg CJ
a E £ fe §
1 £8 | f
== _ ,- CO C
1 .1 § » I
8 -s E 5 °
£ §) o °- g
•- tot CB .<»
E ffl CD £ £
CO T3 " •- 0
* -1 i h
E 1-5 o> g
Jr? ^ ^* CJ
Q. "S3 W c D
g E^2 IS
J o S | 1?
•S 3 i C3)
JS * CT CO c
0) S* £ C '"CO
! it ! I
1 14 ! s
CD -= « "2
-g « I? « i
CO 3 03 -3 ._
ffl - = "° B
€ S3 co E o
*T ^ CO CU 'C
^ c ^ "S >
0,0, K- S i5
c .£ v g- E Q. Q. .
si 1 "5 •? li
It Ig fl 1 I|
11 IS fl f M
£_ *-» -2co PCCD
38 =R *i i sl
^1 ;5 ?8 1 tl
IE If -gg^ S 5g
CD ^^ C > mZ^ Ju ^^ /" «t\
w O C> O3CDf- •*- O-n
la &? §-i| g> |1
>< g{ 23« ^ =|S
*w .2o = 3 ? S E|
8S 11 l^f | p
§2 »» £»E § §18
II If ill ? 11
2V £| |ll 8 II
S8 11 S1! 1 51
On ^f/iE >* CD —
^^ ^v •" •— *^ _T_ ^3
• < i Q: i co co c p g
£* ^Q g § ro ° -^
S| UJO «Uj|c? ° ^ffl
^CDO CDQ. -SCDo'l. £ (Eg
|l| |l| |li| 1 a!
2li§ 2ls S I'a5 "? ^J3
CD£Q "co£Q •S£Q-c S QCL
tsoc ooc So-=o c c<
CDCOCO OCOCO QCO^Q. CO COQQ
U.COCO -J C/3 C/3 -JCOD.3 CO COCO



CD
b
*^
"CD
O


-------
Ill   C







^










^ ' A ,

':; >
- -<;,i



CO
.•-ui
-S
• Cfl
tti
o
. z
• .<
Q.
i;|







'ROGRAM
EL



































;ordkeeping.
m
£
f
CO
CD
0
£<
O
o
•o
S
o
o
O







































cc
z
inecticut
o
0







































cc
z
laware
CD
0


































"S
>v
CO
CO
3
CO
'>
J2
"cp
0
O
c
c
CD
CD
.0
CD
CO
.c
£
CD
°1
•II
.22 "5
Q 0



































C
CD
CO
£
a
"5
CD
o
CO
1
o
LL







































<
CO
'S5
o
CD
O
>.
Q.
Q.
CO

5
•«
u
CD
D)
0)
C
o
CD
CO
o
.C

£Z
CO
£
>^
c
u
CO
tn
£
o
CD
>
'8
0)
L_
en
CO "
* =1
l!
Q. O
01
fc £
-Q CD
E >
3 -S
— c
•o 
« y
to -55
£=§
TJ 15
d-contaminated waste (soil and concrete) an
i creating inequity in enforcement and a partii
CO <"
£1
1*
"• £
§•81
££
i
CO
X
CO
D.
<
X
CO
LU
Z.
T3
cz
CO
2
CO
**-^
CO
"E
CO
T3
c
CO
4^
CO
"2
CD
•o
£
_o
•G
CD
5"
CO
CD
, fe
S |
m >
§ CO
?§
"co £
d> CO
1 =
CO CO
o
CO
2







































cc
z
CO
'o
c
=

>•- CO
o c
— o
CD =
•S co w
So "£
at'-Q. CD
.£ a E
= CO m CD
O »j Hi *-
1— • — u\ —.
flit
O CL (0 _
C! ^ O)
= 05 § C
CN ~ f3 3S
^~ CQ ffl C
CO S N E
« 2L| s
c o ^ °-
CD ® CZ =
73 § co co
£, § a o>
Q w ® -i
IJ i_ o a
. 0 C CD
CO C CO CD
§1 §1
=5 'S I §
3 C « CO
C35 O E •-
CD "3« ^^ Q_
S to ? rf
w -• C *^
^J £ CO X
CO £> C -D
g 3 O C
S « = co
"w -^ £ O
§ g aO
* .§ o >
"co tT c .!=
E •§« a
3^0®
-a ? - S
C m c «=
.= CO 
= .£ « »
reinforced plastic NESHAP. New IN styrene
, Wood furniture NESHAP Title V permit requ
roplating NESHAP (recordkeeping) and the c
neasurement, and management requirements
rules. Stormwater monitoring.
^ to T1? c co
JS lag'*
«: CO CD .0 S
filll
C 3 •= "g fO
o °- | t a5
8 P £ CD >
a (j) ^ ~m C
Z) aO -S Z)
CO
CO
^
_c

O)
"co
1
§
^
c
CO
X •"
t«
0 5
8 >
*• s
o o
t . £;
CD c

co 6
8--S
-1
2^
•o £
(U Ct
•|.£2
O" *^
£^
CD ^
£ 5
CO ^

E" !
s^
II
CD c
Q. Z
O) *-
c ^
yz c
Q. £
0 0
® T3
sources that do a Federally Enforceable Stal
ment compliance. Small businesses want to
L_ ^
c g
1 o
o 5
03 .2
ll
§.8
co £

«J
_o
                                                                                                                                                                             CO

                                                                                                                                                                            "5
                                                                                                                                                                            z

-------
O  §

UJ  c
_i '•&
m  c
:

QOMPUANCE ISSUES


<
cc.
o
o
te.
a.
d> m T3
most difficult to maintain. KS hazardous
of all the recordkeeping and reporting
that may affect their industry sector continu
inues contacting these sectors directly for
eparate sets of regulations. The multimedii
cleaners.
businesses. Many businesses continue to
zardous waste disposal service and believe
acause their wastes are handled and haule
jrators and are not covered under RCRA.
s operations, including air emission
with which the program has worked, RCRA requirements tend to be the
restrictive than federal regulations, and many businesses are unaware
lack of awareness of particular air regulations (MACTs and NESHAPs)
n understanding of their own potential for emissions. Our program conl
state-specific rules for dry cleaners that require them to comply with 3 s
designed to address this difficulty and continue to be very popular with
raste is the most common problem seen by our program among smaller
ed to do with respect to environmental regulations. They may use a ha;
e of everything their businesses needs to do. Some also believe that b
factors that their businesses are not classified as hazardous waste gene
ir wastes or examine other environmental requirements of their busines
v reporting.
jlijij
1 la 111 f|lll°
tfiil I Ifli
nisi! Him

CO
03
CO

ecognizing the seriousness of the pollutant
ndustry sectors, such as printers and dry
iroduction needs for a new business.
portunity to debug their process before
jse an inordinate amount of compliance issues for small businesses. R
riformation and assistance from EPA is limited when compared to other
ot have enough flexibility to permit changes in design, process flow, or |
rmits prevents businesses, especially the small ones, from having an op
•mit.
5 •- «= CD S
o CD o a. a
^ £ •"=> c en
H i|l
He = S o
< 8 &i S
52 » 8 s
£C C 0) 0)
Il5 Hi
0 a c 3 -i S
2 S 8 ®.i S
H£-S a: QJ £

o
^
O)


so small businesses can leam more about the regulatory requirements
ID
a
a
Cfl
1.
1
Q
C
CC
a.
CD
>,
O
c
1
05
£
CD


mits as well as stormwater permit problems.
8.
Q.
!c
£
CD
CO
a
_c
S
"5
•s
cc

cc
a
.£2
C

of understanding of the requirements.
5ms across all businesses include hazardous waste violations from lack
JD
S
Q.
8
Common complia

CD
C
cc

u
CO
•a
£
o
T3
0>
•o
T3
CO
.2
Q.
"3
CT
mits when a business is sold or renamed. Obtaining new permits when
CD
n.
o>
_c
•&
£
S
o
m
-.=
cc
|

•a
cz
CO
£-
cc

T5
13
'o
£
a
CO
J3
-a
3
1
9
Jnderstanding MACTs and stormwater. Plain language guidance docun
|
1
a
.b
<
"a
en
2
c.
CD
CO
1
u
jcially the recordkeeping requirements. Ro
ium plating NESHAP. Surface coating for metal parts (state rules), espe
sources. Lack of qood data for Quantifying emissions.
ive chrom
n elevator
S 2
8 °
«1
l.i
!>%
£1

c
CO
O)
JZ
1

-------
O  §

HI  C
_J  :5

m









COMPLIANCE ISSUES








O
o
K
0.

, 1-
.0
« | .
"o to 2
* in
£ £ CD
.2> TO-
S? c c
3 2 T.
* rf
CL 2 "•§
< m «
I £ -
35 CD g
nformation that applies to air permitting (e.g., %VOC by weight, HAP listing including
ision inventory and fee process. Hazardous air pollutant tracking.
usiness to take the steps necessary for compliance, particularly if others in the sector
-specific disincentives, like cost or time required to comply, or often, lack of enforcem
— JS .a co
•s E « 8
« » C C •> .2 "C
EroS'-S ^tB0!
Ifsp III
IP
>«m5-cn> rt*tfc
ieping tend to create much confusion. Most businesses have difficulty relating to whu
nesses are unclear on how "compliance" is determined (and maintained) and if regulc
ave arisen when different media regulate different aspects of one operation. For exai
lir emission control and hazardous waste regulations. Unless all media involved are i
er may feel he or she is in compliance with "environmental regulations" when they ha
e problems can be addressed through the expansion of the SBTAPs into multimedia (
encies. With the implementation of compliance incentive policies, there is no reason
sistance and compliance assurance activities. Although each group needs to maintai
ps have a common purpose, which is compliance.
jZCO.C"'C OO>o)3
p = w£i 5CO«'2
fcCOEoo J^oro
o.cD-0"3 a-o°.c
£ gS2 | ill if
o -2 e o -i = 8 3, i. -°
^ro^S^o cS3!""
Sfsfs! |lil
ȣo -,T E^SCCD
c°m:§ScS §««>
us til Stu
fij&Jijii Illl
2
!c
tn
a.
g E
CD CD
Z I
£
•^
5
.>•
a
I
2
CO
CD
CO
CO
CD
_c
'co
£1
16
CO
chart above are all problems to small businesses. Too much paperwork required for
1 benefit.
CD CO
£«
- 1
TJ C
2 P
CO -5

£ CD
2 o
S c
? >-
E o
CD CD
H 1
C^
£
05
CD
Z

















<
8
"x
03

1
z
                                                                                                                                  cc
                                                                                                                                  z

-------
O

UJ
O

c
a  £
 E Q. .c ° .
•2 .32 CD -5 — M c
ffi j— L_ ^ — -^ A
fl'IP "1
o o S. o *5 ^«. o
CO "^ 05 *^ ffl ~* •"•
i gS S E I «
"2 czz ^3 .£ ® Jn **
Dry cleaners in NY state are subject not only to the federal NESHAP, but also to a significantly more bu
with the environmentally substantive, equipment-based elements of the NESHAP appears to be less dif
NESHAP recordkeeping requirements. However, the NESHAP requirements coupled with the complex
cleaners to achieve total compliance. In addition, NY dry cleaners have to respond to phased out deadl
businesses that typically have fewer than 10 employees, only a couple of whom may actually operate th
state regulatory requirements are difficult to understand and follow.
The various regional offices of the state's regulatory authority interpret state and federal regulations diff*
for assistance providers who encounter different responses to similar business situations, depending or



\x
•£
1
Z
CO a)

£1 ™ .1
Q)  (0 i-
II 1 11 1

E -0 S c S- ??

^3 fc— CD CO CD ^7
~
t- ss E O c TS
.. Q. X •< C JS
co E ° £ » .2
5 O en Q> O >
Last year, we reported working with AQ staff to revise the photochemical reactive rule. That regulation \
work practice standard, encouraging P2 practices. This regulation created substantial paperwork and c
relieve a major amount of confusion for these types of sources.
The perc dry cleaner NESHAP Part 63, Subpart M continues to be problematic. This year, we sent out :
recordkeeping requirements in one place and has dramatically improved compliance.
Most small woodworkers are unaware that the Wood Furniture NESHAP Part 63, Subpart JJ requires th
applicability. Our air permitting process needs some changes. We currently are working with AQ staff t
involved in a larger departmental effort to improve the permitting process.
The Division of Air Quality recently decided not to issue warning letters anymore and pursue Notices of
They also have switched to a philosophy of minimum civil penalties for most all NOVs.
CO

:^
£
CO
O
o
z


















a
c

a
^»
^
a
c


-CO
i

1
^
CO
£
1o
T3
£
^
(7


CD
c?
._
CO
£Z
Small businesses have the most trouble with state permitting requirements, not federal regulations. Nol
the most common violation found at small businesses.





.0
6


















Lack of knowledge regarding air permit requirements and hazardous waste storage and labeling.



CO
1
1
O

T3
O

CO
IE
E
^s
o
"53
CD
"O
_i
L.
"co
£
L.
CO
T5
_CD
Monitoring and especially recordkeeping are problems for dry cleaners. BAP revised the dry cleaner ca
qreatly improve recordkeeping. The calendar was very well received by the dry cleaners.




c
O)
6


















f£
Z

Cl
'c
Cl
"1
c
c
CL


















tr
z


o
<.
o
•c
(
CL
                                                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                                                  z
                                                                                                                                                  <£.

                                                                                                                                                  Z

-------
O  §

UJ  E
^ •*•>
CQ  C
<  O






















COMPLIANCE ISSUES

5

o

A
u>

1-" W
If-
O ^g ^
TO = -g
C JO g
.. CO Q.
l-o
{S 5 2s
£p
- § &
CO O w
IcE *S *"*
— ° '33
•J? o £
^ CO CD
3 ^ ,y
to .ti Tg
c 5 co
TO «- ~O
o E e
L- CD CO
£3^5
3 S co
u Q- a5
•2 TO i=
111
£ 0. 3
:= o P
VOC tracking could be a problem for a small business that uses many coatings. The coal
unambiguous manner, which is always helpful. MSDS formats for small businesses also i
from one form to the next. OSHA and EPA could work together to help coating/chemical i
data.

-Q
.TO
tD
CD
•a
o
sz
t£






















Failure to properly label hazardous waste.
CO
£=
1
CD
0
.£
3
O
co






















Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT).

S
"o
CO
Q
J=
•^
o
CO
TO co
CO CO
5? 5 o
1 u-2
h- J= 0-
5 E
c & °
1 If
§• '5 c
O C3~ O
>- £ •—
O) >, C
.— s 03
^ S cjj
Q. C •= "TO
p o 2. 3
•- •*: S? £T
•SO £ 00
CO m *-
£ — -o o
E S S c
° £ 8.-S
I i *i
TO £ •- «>
E c ° fo
S C JO 3-
C TO C TO
Ensuring all facilities affected by a new regulation are aware of requirements. Managing i
proactive compliance measures (e.g., attending training programs) rather than waiting for
Some small business owners may purchase a business without checking if there are any
problem with some dry cleaners. Most small businesses are concerned about financial m
something good for them and their business.


0)
CD
CO
CO
0)
c
c
0)

•5 t?
^ U
flj O fl)
JC C &=
~ - TO »

>» *** £ c T;
~ co 5 *- c
CD CO > CO C
Q. CD O £ O
P « CO ** "
1 MS5
i =1«1
« i -Q a
c TO _ o) a
•2 | TO £ o

c 2 ^ ^ s o
§"^ ^3 "**I 5 *•&
£ C "5 CO S
aj *- ™ CD = 'C
CD P co" Q .2 O
"O "r^ ^ .S — ^
Q) ~ O lo ° ^
to 3 75 ^ 
-------
^ "S
o  §

UJ  C
_J 33





















CO
uu
CO
CO

Ul
o


COMPLI


4
c
c

0.

c
2
S
CD
O)
Q.
E
CD
X
CD
>,
"co
.g

=5 CD'
C O
8 S
b -2
•«= X
c CD

E CO
o c
LL. O
§1
If
'•B CO
O CD
n
0 CB
IT ra
CD 03


IS •*

J£ °
ifests filed incorrectly. Poor recordkeeping (all media). La<
red by law. Not knowing a regulation existed. General lacl
c '5
JS c
E £
0 H-
o: >


"c
O



2
•s 1
O. >.
S |
1 «
H— 03
O g: 'C
o o  ro
8 1 i «
2 o co =>
CO >, <3 .>>
CD *^ ~ "55
'5= § co
"cc 52 IS -n
*! 11
CM CO CO U
>< >> c~ •£
•so -2 i
01 •£ "/so
C CD CO 7}
= •= o °
II II
8 « 2 |
co CD «i S
to > » b
iS o «»
'1= So

Q = CD CU
lations continue to be highly confusing and a disincentive ti
/ays in." Even if a business eliminates all pollution, they sti
9liminate great confusion, difficulty, and inconsistencies in i
emissions identification and tracking program, which busin
hi!
§1 < s


CD
'c

'I5

§







^

CO
O)
s
a
c
1
c
CO
c
o
ts
fl3
Q
ca
'1
§
1
i^
O
0
CO


J2
E
small businesses are just getting to understand the progra
c
•s
"5
CO
•c
•5
c

^
^





























cc

c
1

o
a
5




























a
_a
|
No unusual

'£
ii
^
Cf
0

>g
£
CD
>
i
3
C
'CD

CD
El
^

CO
i
£
H—
o
CD
E
uT
O
i
X
8
£ i
E "o.
1 i
CB C
Q. "T
T3 O t- 3 x- CO O ^
o is o o> Q. ££
mil i|
™ 0 Jj H- Q O £


1C
"co
f"
o
o
CO
^
CO
O
"c

~ 2

CD C
c «
.E «o
>-i
CD CD
11
CD 0)
'S'g
1 1
c CD
E N
E|
CD £2
£ .32
CO 'fc
CO CD
0 ^3
i- _
O £
CO U
derable progress is being made to reach small businesses
will continue through our outreach efforts to break down si
and advocating P2 initiatives to the business community.
While consi
SBO/SBAP
assistance


CT)
1
Q

^

-------
LL1







O
UJ
X


H-

i
UPLYING '
BUSINESSES IN COft
% CHANGES TO ASSIST SMALL
0
LL.
CO
O
iMMENDATI
o
O
UJ
£








1
Ul
f

,
H*
3
o

IN COMPLYI
1ST SMALL BUSINESSES
EMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO ASS!
0
o
LU



s
PROGRAI




















CC



CO
<















.£2
, but there were no applican
le SBAP manager. A recruitment was held
t
1
CO
s
0
CO
03



CO
CO
.2
<

CO
CO
03
?
92. co
S -C
s%
II
09 °-
£. t.
O O

t6
o c
•a .0

CO CD
sl
11
11
multimedia. Many business
jnts and not the potential im
>BAPs to expand/enhance their program to
tance provider only looks at CAA requiretro
and.
2 eo 2?
§ £ a-
TJ M— l_
Providing funi
environment i
have on wate



CO
1
<
















03
03
ial level, possibly a public service announc
0
1
to
o>
1
CO
I
09
m



Maricopa




















CC



rkansas
<
"o
CO
o. "5
Q. u
CO CD
09 *~
'•§ §
Q. 9>
•c 3
CD "E
** '5
5 §•


il

CO £
effective. In
the regulatio
quality management is not
should be incorporated. If
m.
ze of CA, a one-size-fits-all approach to air
egulations follow, some degree of flexibility
st effective approaches could often be take
CO >- 0
IP
"«2 03 Q)
CD S C
Given the divi
that many of 1
based, many



alifornia
O




?
55
c
ent whei
C£
C
'co
ts
CO
09
U
CO
quick compli
• or eliminate fines in lieu of
ance. Use enforcement discretion to lower
CO
'co
CO
CO
t
Continue to s
appropriate.



olorado
o



















i



onnecticut
o



















cc



elaware
Q
•o
8
u
03
Q.
CD

.Q
LO-


CO
09
jj>
"5
o-
09
CC
CL

to
andates of S
ig specifically to carry out m
ative program.
be a multimedia program. Increase fundin
tment/agency or be placed as an adminlstr
11
— ^
If
to ^
"CO C35
£ £
"» 5
03 O
0) =
§> CO
co .£



S5
•II
.2 "o
Q 0


•o
c
CD
>^
±i
availabil
-
.*;
i^
.0
'co
c
CO
crease progr
'awareness campaigns to in
for sustained funding to conduct outreacW
ate SBAP as a multimedia service provider
S c
CO C39
TJ "co
C CD
E .>,
CJ 7n
Provide speci
service. Offic



CO
o
LL.



















z.



eg
a
•o
CO
09
to
%—
CO
§•
&
CO
E1
=5
o
^
•a
CO
03
to

09
O
inal conferen
xirate or co-sponsor a natio
npliance assistance programs should collal
j OECA con
nferences.
EPA SBO ani
competinq co



1
•x.
                                                                                                                                                            &
                                                                                                                                                            2

-------
o  §

UJ  c
-i v

ffi








O
UJ
i

o
z
^^
SINESSES IN COMF1
= m
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO ASSIST SMALL



5
^
K
o
o
Q£
O.
x
0)
•££
CO
3
£
CD
CO
CD
O
"S.
o
•a
CO
>,
i
CO
CO
-C
tandards. Because ID
lulatory authority.
o^£
it would be helpful if the state had full delegation of the NSPS and NESHA
;nce only, there is confusion among all businesses as to which agency has
si
= £





o
CO


















a:
•z.




CO
'o
c
•o
CD CO („
'o jg o
Sx ^ m
gj CD jS
CO C w
fli
To ® 15

i- £• 1
'co "5 "S
CD J- E
f*-
m p «
aj c "
o £ £R
ed to ensure complian
rdination between envi
istance to small businc
~a o ">
tO ft CO
ce paperwork requirements where they are redundant or when no longer n<
do need the information that we request from small businesses. Improve <
sen regulatory agencies to combine reporting requirements. Provide more i
lands-on instructions.
i « 1 i
Q: £ .a i




CO
.2
c











CO
1
"o
Q

or voluntary disclosure
CO
CD
incentives for voluntary compliance, such as clear and simple audit privilec:
£
5





CO
<

CO
s
CD
{=
"3
>

"co
o
1
CD
^0

o
CD •
II
$<&
SB
~ 1
sw the CAP. Locating people willing to serve is difficult, and there is little fo
sense, rather than one in each state. At the very least, the CAP should be
•| £
Q) C
tr E




CO
CO
CO
£Z
CO

O)
IE
.2
c -a
«= c
-0 CO
§ -2


o> —
*•* O
•88
W CO

« c EC

S f CO
^1
ill
O CD Q}
® 0 '§
5 0 3
JO a) CO
'« CO =S
>w that there is help av
lain invisible until they
ates participate in Sm<
= 1 "
-§ £ o
ional public relations program should be developed to let small businesses
esses want to comply with the law, but fear the bureaucracies, so they will
ans program would let them know that it's OK to contact the agency. Let th
ocal level. Organize a national CAP.
! -3 18 «
3 ~ZZ C
< .0 £ o



CO
.2
iss
o


















tr
•z.




CD
C
'5


















(T
"Z.




c
_c
^
c


















CC
"Z.
a
*
c
I
jd
c.
c
CO
(
(
CM
                                                                                                                 I
                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                                 Z

-------
o
UJ
_j
CO







3
o
UJ
• 1-
X
t
ALL BUSINESSES IN COMPLYING W
. g
CO
t_
CO
CO
CO
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO /
|
I
O
Q.


T5 ° "5 ™ J
5fi ^^ Q3 (O fi\ ••• -»
>§NQ-Q.£-,§
^ d "^ h^ ^ "S °" "®
S C E CQ CO 03 X3 ^
o -| 1. ~ « : £ i •£
||li||||-g£,
O *™ O) ^ Q 03 O •— O "co
°-i'-i.j?'co i,5 =•«-§
|°-§|c1»8-So
C"{5 ^ CO c'O^'m ^*-
"r_c-ej j; ~L_"C 2"S
itives. EPA should include SBAPs earl;
actively solicit feedback from SBAPs o
3 a more common sense application to
inder the SBTCP administration only) f<
luce air emissions. Provide more granl
•ogram content and services to various
rederal or state grants would allow SB"
to coordinate and package environmei
•oduced to students at the secondary 01
nt, and useful knowledge and experien
"O "5 -«' Jn 5. *^ CO
~ 3 •> co •- — co o — co
-— O O C O 5 CD 33 CD ^
Q CO O ^ CD ^ ••" i - „
c-o2*- CD E c^'§)-2?
:^mCOmE^'(A — •=$
US EPA should work more closely with SBAPs on national comp
establishing goals and criteria for compliance and enforcement, i
Establish consistent requirements and expand EPA's initial efforl
executing new rules and regulations. Provide grants or low inter
businesses to modify current facility processes and control equip
develop, utilize, and evaluate innovative ways to distribute envirc
"back door" approach to outreach and education for the small bu
state government, business, industry, and statewide educational
information that is specific to industry sectors. The information n
by the time the student enters the workforce, he/she will bring tin

c
CD
O)
s
5
CD
^
3
O
.c
CO
y, c
CD o
CO "
CO >>
CD u
i!
3 LL
.O CO
= <

c
1




















More proactive approach.
"a.
a.
"co
co
"eo
CB
^




















DC.
Z

3
o
CO
_co
5




















Q:
z

CD
I
C
2




















 C
CD CO
= "° 9-
ls|
Q.-O 2
o § „
CD = 0
—5 £5 t££
1 §£
•£ 8 .
O CD fS
o .n £
2 v £5
e for effective operations. EPA needs
»r their specific application. Work shoul
Jding to the burden on assistance prog
>uld be continued.
f} £J fZ ^
J5 CD +* co
'5 "S o K
ID « 1 c

7-T\ CO ^ *?5
Encourage/require SBTCPs to be multimedia and ensure fundinc
industry sector based assistance tools that can be modified by e
clear guidance, tools, and funding for effectiveness measuremer
SBTCPs to be the lead programs for environmentally related ass
£
CO
Q.
CD CO
Z I
0
s
c
v2 _
•o 1 g
aj 5 „
s » s
3 =5 co
g3S
2 eo ""S
5 o° .P
- rf *=
=§•2 ?
CD CO E
£ "35 S
i^ JJ* ^
•r; O o>
1 and state SBO/SBAP programs. Spe<
[liable through the federal and state SB
ecific states would greatly increase pro
CO g CL
CD CO _
"^ CO •"
S "55
* £ S
0 CD ...
US EPA must increase its marketing and publicity campaign for 1
community needs to be informed of the compliance assistance s
levels for more staff and increased program activities at the state
outreach.
09
i
—>
1
z
CO
                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                  Z

-------
o
UJ
  o
  o
       o
       111
       o

       a.
       o
       o
       CO
       UJ
       CO
       CO
       UJ

       CO
       CD

       I
       CO
CO
CO

e
CO
UJ
o
o
t£.
2
z
o
       UJ

       o
       o
       UJ
          IT
          (U
      co y Q- u ic ic
      is 1* \%%
      I-5 81F5
      5 CO c J3 Q; •-

      lit!!!

ig
               *
                  s
onmental re
nstrate they
ess stationa
St
as
      -s
      £
      I
                          .2.2 «
                                  CO
usi
robl
be
ll
e
n
ir
                                  &
                           •g = caJ
utr
ire
rde
a
                             fefi i
                             s at
                             ilMl
                                        E -a
req
at i
ig,
iibl
a
0
                                                                   3
                                                                   S
                                            cc
CO

o
£
CO
32
O

-------











ABLE G-2
Continued)
H Q























~ <
<
o
Ul
\(-
'X
i
i
~> ^_.
^
s
' .S
c
z
CO
SMALL BUSINESSE
••fc
GESTOASSI
'Z
<
a
oi
2
. a>
g


Ul
RECOMN



S
<
O
o
K
a

i * TH §
„*§ 1 8 is.
C -S - CO to _ *- 0 .gj-
"o^^co-G &• ?0 IS »£
"cflCUcg^cD CD Eco c •*«
1H !! ! ii 1 11
II! ii it ! i!
Ill II t IS | I!
Ill ii 1 «| ! li
SS« Ef « If ~. I-
/ \ ~n -^ ^ m it CD Q) w *sr ?>
^lt 51 -i ^5 1 £|
5 . o g 8 .2 « Q £ jj S
«ncCQ.>!r £ "O. tO 353
0 o Z^ .£ g « ro E § •£ ™
inCCD — m -i. Cm C CCD
|ico-c.8c =* --§2 o =£
SCWaj-K g og5 CN oO
E-^053 8 &§ °- -
Hi If t li S IS
HI if !• ft I SS
f!lii ! IU 11
*^ rt T3 CO •" JK ™ JM
^•^0>-s£ CD 'wS 3 °L®
£ 2 C M g S !g£ ^ ,— Q. 0 2 = = « OQ C Z Q-
tPi ^S I 11 "1 if
HE I! i 11 M
~IS,c= o op -s=coS
W CD D) ^~ ^ ICir .is Q?O-
g^S^S o g" |8!5bS
S o,^ &g fe g | |g- i g|
C.E™ CD= -C S2.2 Om i-^®
1§| SI « dl ij *g£
^SIS Q«i e "V "S;c COSD
-yS $ i i .E-m-t
^2-52 -E>E ®£ mSro -gg s i g
l-w< U-£CB CTco co^o. UJD. HwS



c
o
?
O























o:
z

2
CD
>
>,
CO
c
c
CD
Q_























tr
z


8
ir
0
CD
a

•^
E
CD
erseers of the operating p
M
03 cr
£ 1
w 1
JC -=-
o £
CO CC
a multimedia fashion,
lultimedia assistance
sE
o
irform our jobs
res released f(
K3
^i •**
2^
§ s.
•2 x
SI 2
'c "5
E £
CD *-
Q. CO
CD CD
S 3
Z ^
5 co
•^ ^
£ o
5 2
co 'CD
IS
co •*»
CD £,
S to
CD =>
Ii
II
CO O)
CD o
E Q.

•o
_eo
_JO
CD
•o
O
cE























a:
z
CO
c
1
CO
O

.C
"3
o
CO
CO
CO
SI
to
B
*^
c
8
CD
O
Q
S
CO
§2
CD
CD
CO
CD
I
CO
3
•o
c.
o

-------
UJ
_i
00
   o




£
3
UJ
X
S
E
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO ASSIST SMALL BUSINESSES IN COMPLYING 1
S
Q£
8
K
a.

£ 3! 15 c
£  r- ^ C ~.
"O m O O ^^
SSl-5 E £
:? 8.8 S-o ro
*gp ^^ CO u- O ^
« « o 1 § £
« £ g § £ £

llf |||

Section 507 programs should receive federal funds to support program efforts. State program assist each other,
programs, coordinate and attend regional and national meetings, respond to surveys, and submit reports. These
dollars and are voluntary in that they are not done to meet a grant requirement. EPA should ensure there isn't a <
providers. Since the passage of Section 507, some programs and organizations have wanted to expand their act
compliance assistance. EPA should spend its efforts and resources to ensure that coordination and true partners
assistance providers and not service duplication or competition among service providers. A confidentiality regula
may yield greater confidence by the small business community.
co
CO
CO
CO
03
C
CO
1-
If
CD ID  .= to t :=
co i s « a
.§ "3 =j o £.
~S_ T3 _c ^
E £ o £ E
lf|l|
5 m ° CO" ro
Include small business review and input in rulemaking processes. Streamline permitting process. Expand availa
exemptions for small businesses into all rules; use a stair step approach where controls increase as business sizi
Write rules in plain language. Make compliance conditions, such as recordkeeping and reporting, easier by usinc
gallons used vs. pounds per hour). Make all small business assistance multimedia at both state and federal level
adequate funding. Increase availability of low-cost loans and grants for small businesses and local governments,
procedures.


CO
CO
X
CO
H
1
g
i1
fe
•o
o
u
(^
S
£
u
CO
£
Q.
Q.
CB
Environmental assessment training opportunities - Industry specific training sessions that provide a step-by-step i
environmental assessments including P2 assessments, would be of great benefit to SBAP staff.



JC
S
^


>.
^5
co
c
£
CO
o
o
VT needs more assistance program employees. One person cannot cover the needs for the entire business sect
advertising the program at this time, because the staff person cannot take on more work than is now coming in.


o
E
03
>
15
03 ••=
0 O
Q. ? g

~ « 'E
£_ co £
§CD -c
73 0

-2 >. «
1 " 1
2 8, 1?
More comprehensive economic impact analysis of regulations affecting small businesses. Is the gain in emission
will have to be paid?
Continued emphasis and increased activity by EPA in reaching full program integration with all of their rule-makin
regulations should be an indispensable hallmark of all regulations and materials prior to promulgation.
Expansion of SBAPs into multimedia with appropriate funding provided by EPA for inclusion of the other media.
Elimination of the "once in, always in" policy.
Permanent Title V permit exemption for the currently deferred area sources - dry cleaners, halogenated solvent d
electroplaters. ethylene-oxide sterilizers, secondary lead smelters.


.2
C
j?
>
CO

-------
0  9}
ill
     c
    v






<
<
o
11

X
5
>•
(9
• 2
X
BUSINESSES IN CQMP
,

.._"_ :
'-• <
~s
OATIONS FOR CHANGES TO ASSIST SI
z
ui
«£
8
u
Of
S
2
O
o
f^
£






















c
£
CD
Q.
'S
•a
CO
a>
I
a>
_to
c
"co
a.
CO
"O
CO
_co
c
"ff
>

























o:

o
I1
Jc
%
§
_2
(B  E •*= 1 g
1 8°^
f£ i. a? co m
-§ ~ .<2 co CO
co a ^ E M
Q- CO ® CD o
•S -a S x 03 <°
0 ^J 2 a> o 5^
^IfTBl-S
•3 o) 3 O n S —
« |^1< i §
^ ; l S s £ l
co ^|i5 P|
•C JC ° — ±^ E T3
11111=1
ntal assistance program
some individuals and gro
ild not be in the best inte
tot possess the needed
nel do (and those of mar
exception rather than th<
other programs at their i
o "' 5 - c o .c
c L* O O n ¥ *^
1 fe | -o § £ "5
° m <° to CB .£2 CD
.= 8: ~ -i Q. — ti
discussion about coordinating various env
:life for most SBAPs, including WV's. How
tion 507 programs into other programs. Tl
imary goal. Most suggested alternatives ji
Iting and enforcement staff that our SBAP
ntegrated the SBAP into other programs, i
ted independently and allowed to coordina
«- "5 o 5.-? "^ S?
O CD £- >* *-
75 £#5 §3 S
§ i«S £ S.t5 o
2 co c -2 * % ^
co >,.2 ta eg o >•
There has been a gre
coordination is alread
absorption/consolidat
with CAA requiremeni
routine contact with s!
some states have sue
function most efficieni
CO
"c
s
^^
"S5
CD
§

CO
CO
CD
c .
'co fl
3 3
= »
CO (/
E c
« 0
CD 7i
"1
^.-g1
.2 &
^0 'c
•s0-
•^ ^
— 05
SI
isinesses or less signific;
small businesses to the
S 0
J3 ^
^
J 2
m O
nesty/grace periods when dealing with smi
es not go far enough. Exceptions/exempti
c o
ffl^
i CS
*- c
il
E Q.
Discretionary enforce
policy on self-audit re

c
'co
c
0
o
CO
§
u
t
O)
*^
^
!§
ct
"(^
a
c.
£.
a
S
c
a.
E
P2 practices or compliai
*^
C
,
5
                                                                                                                                                    .

                                                                                                                                                    S

                                                                                                                                                    1

-------
          co

          c
          o
         "H.


          I
          Q.

          O

         O
         O,



          1
         "c


          (D


         1

          8

          CO


         .2
         "x
   —I     CD
   ^     i—
   r?     o
   CO
   UJ
   D
   CO
   CO
   UJ
   a
w
GO h-

£23

   UJ

   Z

   U.
   O

   U

   u.

   O
   O
          CO
          CO
          CO

          £
         •D
         T3
          CO

          CO


          5
          D)
          O
         "CD
          co  2
          co  •£
          C  CD
          .2  2
          "3  'c

          i  8
          £  CD
          .c  -Q

          0  c

          1  CO*
          2  E
          Q- co
          co  P

          O  2

          m  2
          c/>  Q-















g
JDRESOLU
, ^^
;"* ,.•«
'"*/' Df
•• o
O
*£
05
U H
"I

6
O)

o 1
- CO tc
III
Dnships with the |
exposure. Ourp
our report is not
'orking relatii
thout risk of
usiness that
Existing policies, strong support from the ADEQ Director, and good w
maintain our credibility as a source of assistance that can be used wi
confidentiality. In fact, before we conduct a site visit, we inform the b


<

"o
c
2.
CO ®

1|
" £
§3 «>
II
"c fe
LU S
• £
r- O
|i
c 13
O CD
W P
to confidentiality
sses should be pi
jre devoted 1
lieve busines
mpliance.
This has never been an issue, although much time and discussion w<
trying to discover what sites we're working with nor do we (SBAP) bel
shielded for a period of time while operating in good faith to obtain co

Q.
O
o
~
CO

















Confidentiality has not been an issue.


o:

1
5
2

^i
CD S

••g |
0) *^
f> **-
O 03 C
i|l
*O 0) >
C CO
CD 0 •=
£ CO CO
O a, CD
C ^ 3
£ W
C CO pCO
£ ^ O
,0 CO O
fc 2 c
CD <£ O
ley are orgai
Chairman's
uilding trust.
Many of the CA SBAPs have confidentiality built into the program. Tr
organizations. The SBO's Office at the Air Resources Board is in the
with the regulated community in a non-adversarial manner, thereby b


O


















We have no conflicts in this area.


O
0


















on
Z


o


















o:


UJ
Q














c
.2
ulatory administr
a
£
§
CD
C
SBAP can only avoid internal or external conflicts through placement


8









o
'•5
CD
CO
•s
CD
E
CD
e
£
c
CD
CD
3
i
i
8
sclose compi
We do not require than an inquirer identify him/herself. We do not dis


u.

^
eo "C
Q. 3
o *•

^ "CD
y cy
.* .>>
co 75
"8 i
CO O
CO C
ll
•0 H-
c .
CD CD
5 c
in ^
CO "55
•c "55
~* en
t years, the issue
de confidential a:
co -r
&i
c ^•
to g
To date, we have not had any conflicts develop because of confldenti
internal meetings. We explained that the Air Quality Rules state that
discussion of the issue.


O

                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                     Z
                                                                                                                    cc
                                                                                                                    Z
                                                                                                                     <
                                                                                                                     Z

-------
HI
_!

00
C




coi ISSUES AND RESOLUTIONS
*\
STATE
TERRIT



c >>
So
SBO does not report to regulatory programs. The ombudsman is an appointed position with safeguards against retribution termina
Files, cases, and the list of contacts are kept locked and encrypted. Memorandum of Agreement governs relationships with regula
programs. SBO maintains strict confidentiality in his individual counseling actions when requested.

X


^
~- 1 .5"
Since NSPS and NESHAP regulations are not delegated programs to the state of ID, SBAP encourages the use of EPA's Policy on
Compliance Incentives for Small Businesses for issues dealing with these federal regulations. Since the SBAP is located within DE
cannot offer confidentiality to small businesses and does not advertise that it does so. Currently ID DEQ does not have a policy to
SBAP to offer confidentiality to small businesses, nor is there a statutory requirement allowing for confidentiality. SBAP drafted a p
similar to EPA's and is seeking approval of this policy by the Administration. SBAP has not experienced any COI to date.

g




&
CD
ra
CO
_o
1
I

-------
O

HI










COJ ISSUES AND RESOLUTIONS





1 STATE OR
TERRITORY
'I « =
1 8-1
E C O) T3
= m •- % 52
o c "5. -t! S
• e^ c
SO t O) .£ TJ
 §
co o £ .<2 P £ 8
*







a
c
c

"o
e to encourage the honest reporting and prompt remediation of non-compliant siti
u
JO
Q.
c
CO
s
O)
8
amnesty p
^
>N
O
s=
09
-3
cb
m" "^
> i
o> >
> c
O rn
I CB
^a
I >
^ CO
c •=
O co
'"m 5
TO
C -C!
arding confidentiality with state enforcement, because LA has a Freedom of Inforr
into the state, unannounced, and levy heavy fines on small businesses with whici
hat our program is not confidential.
O) CB **
£ 1 s
1 8 =
is?
§1 a,
Q- Q. Q)
g ^£
-o < .5
Sj Q. »
•5 uj «
Q] w
IP
^ .2 to
a) o> •=
§ £H
5










Business Compliance Incentives Polity based on EPA guidance.
CO
CO
CD
i
"5.
o
•o
CO
CO
CO
.c
0.
£
CD
CO
Ul
2















cc
Q
2















CC.
z
<
_ CO >. CO C Q.
§ ? °f»l IS
!-r rf en TO CO s ±i ef\
5 ^ E-5-^-S S05
1 CL il = -2 ?I"8
QOmS-:::^ CHE'S
CO Ll£—£D'~ °> fc «O
= r-~eoa':»=:= eo 0) "«
ro OQOD§.E£-gl5 Op™
CD >, <0 O == (^ 0) (D •£ U5
S 5 ^8 >|i S^5
£ ^i^-o8c -ojo^
£ 3 8 « 2 « g * « •§
C >>2ctO~" COCB'-
o Po92-£So ro.S-S
and internal conflicts of interest, oftentimes the SBO staff will initiate anonymous c
1 regulatory staff.
nflicts of interest, confidentiality has not been an issue with the current services pr
1 warrant the collection of sensitive data. SBAP does not perform on-site audits, s
i the near future, SBTCP will develop a policy on how the program will respond wh
issistance and that information contained in SBTCP files or databases will not be ?
ironmental Quality's Air Quality Division). SBTCP cannot claim that this InformatH
/ll's Environmental Audit Privilege and Immunity Law, which designates the terms
ency in a confidentiality agreement.
interest, SBTCP works closely with the regulatory agency, Ml Air Quality Division,
ectives. SBAP staff are included in and advised of all policy developments regard
education, outreach, and marketing arm for the state's air quality program, and thi
interest.
|| 8|^S» |fco
a 1 l^Sloio 1 | S S
si lisiiii iS*i
s i g ^ i £ § i a 82^8
So p>= « = t a £ -5 o-CL 15
SE l!il|^ §5gi
o« egSwcooSr; SOW-
|| IiJ|i|l flsl
SS iifif*! !|11
mm m££og)o5 S* 8 ~ TO
coco coa.E'>co5co CCo^S
i
                                                                                                                                       CO
                                                                                                                                         s.
                                                                                                                                         VI
                                                                                                                                         s

-------
"If
o §
UJ C
  o


CQI ISSUES ANP RESOUJTIONS
tu t-
< K
fc&
CO .c
"c 1 co
03 > .£
SBAP negotiated with MPCA regulatory staff to develop a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that allows SBAP to provide confid
compliance assistance within all environmental media. This MOU has been very well respected by MPCA regulatory staff, and to a
somewhat lesser but still successful degree, regulatory entities outside MPCA. In addition, SBAP negotiated an enforcement waiver
MPCA regulatory staff for the fiberglass product manufacturing sector. SBAP is very conscientious and proactive about marketing th
aspect of the program through all its outreach tools.
z
2

c
O
SBO/SBAP are regarded by DEQ as independent, confidential, and non-regulatory, and inspectors communicate this to businesses.
site assistance is provided by an outside organization as authorized by EPA's Enforcement Policy for SBAP option. No written
correspondence is maintained by SBO/SBAP concerning the status of audited small businesses.
CO
2

.c
CO r— ^f
as -c co Jj^ to
The regulatory programs and the Technical Assistance Program (TAP) have an understanding that regulatory programs will not look
TAP'S records unless a facility is under enforcement. If TAP finds a violation that is not a substantial and immediate threat to human
or the environment, recommendations are made to get the facility into compliance, but no report is turned over to the regulatory prog
If a violation that is substantial and an immediate threat to human health or the environment is encountered, the facility is notified tha
must report this to the appropriate regulatory program. Facilities that come to TAP for assistance are favorably looked upon when it
discovered they need a permit and TAP assists them with attaining compliance.
O




z
i-
2

to CD
^ .O ,«_,
je = o § "°
NDEQ continues to perceive a great deal of undue concern regarding confidentiality and compliance assistance. The confidentiality
hinders assistance efforts, because some businesses are concerned that if they request and receive a site visit, the site visit report v\
used against them later by an inspector. This concern is unfounded in NE. For a business to receive and be prosecuted for a violati
without first having an opportunity to rectify the situation is very rare, almost unheard of, unless the violation is of significant or immin
danger to the environment or public health. Businesses that have significant violations are not the ones that request a site visit. The
confidentiality is the most significant barrier to businesses seeking assistance. NDEQ is instituting measures to educate business ar
agency personnel regarding the "ground rules" of compliance assistance visits and what the ramifications of receiving and giving
assistance are.
UJ
z

. o
to c
0 CO O _
•£ .c o £
The Bureau of Air Quality of the NV Division of Environmental Protection contracts with the SBDC Business Environmental Program
technical assistance to small businesses. This third party provides free and confidential assistance to small businesses, conducts
seminars, and develops outreach materials at the direction of the Bureau based on program needs for the year and as contained in t
interagency contract for services. BEP also provides similar services to Clark and Washoe Counties (Las Vegas and Reno) for servi
and the same type of service delivery format is used. Discretion is applied tn the state SBTCP office to all cases, and businesses wi
compliance issues are encouraged to enter into an audit agreement where fines and penalties are waived. SBAP staff work with the
requlatory aspect of the aaency to identify and taraet problem areas for outreach and assistance.

z

                                                                    a
                                                                    tn
                                                                    s

                                                                    i

-------
o  §
UJC



COI ISSUES AND RESOLUTIONS
*s
UJ 1-
HI
«£
t5
CD •£. ^
fe| -a _
NH SBTAP continues its policy to offer businesses the option of remaining anonymous or of taking advantage of the Compliance
Incentives Policy. We continue to encourage businesses to use this Policy and have found the majority of businesses we deal with
taking advantage of it. We continue to work closely with the compliance assurance personnel to ensure these businesses are not s
to punitive enforcement actions providing that the businesses agree to rectify any deficiencies within a set time frame. In addition,
compliance assurance personnel often will refer complaints against smaller operations to SBTAP for resolution. These referrals usi
are for businesses that are in industry sectors where SBTAP has done considerable outreach (such as auto body shops) where the
complaints can be resolved through the application of "standard" actions. As a general rule. SBTAP discourages businesses from
remaining "confidential" as they are not afforded the level of "protection" the Compliance Incentives Policy can offer

i
Z
£
£
JS
SBAP has an agreement with NJDEP Enforcement that SBAP information is confidential. SBAP publicizes this information in all co
marketing materials as well as at meetings, seminars, and verbally on the phone.

—3
•z.
>,
.Q
1J3
SBAP does not offer confidentiality. However, any information that is observed by or revealed to SBAP and claimed as a trade sec
the small business will be treated as such by the Environment Department to the extent allowable under state law. The procedure 1
identifying trade secrets to the Environment Department is described in NMED's Public Records and Inspection Policy

5
Z
L.
0>
.C 03
•c o> o
= S" «
U- * &
Confidentiality is key to the success of assistance programs designed to help businesses comply with environmental requirements.
Recognizing this, NY State designed its 507 program to have the SBAP and SBEO each located in non-regulatory state agencies.
NY State assured the confidentiality of the small businesses working with the program by passing legislation that maintains the
confidentiality of their identity, location, and other plant information and protects this information from access under the Freedom of
Information Law. In this way, companies can be frank in describing their problems without fear of reprisals or penalties. However,
confidentiality is not a shield against enforcement that is conducted independently by the regulatory agency, but is in place to encoi
more companies to come forward to discuss their problems so they may achieve compliance. The program also provides a brochu
businesses regarding confidentiality of services.

>-
z


o
We have not experienced an instance where any regulatory entity requested information about a client that we didn't feel at liberty t
discuss. We will be workinq with Counsel to reaffirm our policy of confidentiality and the Department's self-confessor policy

o
z
                                                                                                                                         If)
                                                                                                                                          o

-------
o §
00













COl ISSUES AND RESOLUTIONS
§1
UJ 1-
Hi
ft* iij
CO JJJ
0)
£ | b 0 _
o> £ co "Jo c CD o
C ~ 03 03 O CO *
5M !«&! 5s i
loT-G ^|£-i * ! T3.
fn^co .E«gw-^ £c0co
* Q) ™ O 03 C ^ Q O ^ flj
-rj" Q Q. (0 (O O O •*" •£•* ^ >
"^.2o^ •C'SW® ^^o
"C ^L O * •— *£ ^ *0 *c O
8 coE Q_ ceoO
c 1 -s i i ^ a g = '^^s
JS.^g ^®^co.2 «§£•
f(fi -Q O XI £3 « 5S "m ^ ™ 5
The Department's Environmental Health's environmental programs traditionally have been compliance ass
enforcement reserved for recalcitrant violations or where damage to health or the environment has occurre
the SBO and SBAP, the Department's emphasis was on educating and assisting the regulated community
establishment of the SBO and SBAP, the fundamental approach to compliance hasn't noticeably changed;
have increased.
We don't know if small businesses are reluctant to request assistance or confide in the SBO, since the oml
employed by the Department of Health. Besides serving as SBO, the ombudsman has duties that support
Environmental Health Section. The SBO's assistance with enforcement matters has not been requested tc
the Department's Chief of the Environmental Health Section to refer cases to the SBO when a small busine
frustration in their dealings with the Department. This area should receive continued monitoring and evalui
Dialogue between the SBO and SBAP has resulted in the understanding that small businesses may reveal
that may be treated as confidential and not disclosed to or sought to be disclosed from the SBAP. Informal
business directly to SBAP staff would not be turned over to the compliance program staff for enforcement r;
correcting any violations would be developed. When needed, SBAP provides compliance assistance.
Confidentiality (not disclosing violations to enforcement staff) has really been a non-issue in ND.

Q
2


vJ CO
>, tU-

ffi | &
a. 3 CD 5
0 £ ffl W
<" Q. 0  5 5 u-
£lf g
co . 5 S
SBAP remains separate from district office inspectors who initiate enforcement. Our computer databases,
accessible by SBAP staff. So far, we have not experienced any problems keeping information confidential.
repeatedly visit the field offices to reiterate our services and confidentiality policies, which seem to get lost
With prior approval of our customer, SBAP has worked directly with the district inspectors to resolve violati<
any information gathered by SBO or SBAP being used in an OEPA enforcement action.

i
O


03
TO

CO Q.
-i
"% 8
> 0)
•5 =
*
O "o
0 0
03 03
•S* c
03 03
SBAP is housed in the non-regulatory Customer Service Division in our Agency, which allows us to effectiv
' businesses. Our group is supported very strongly by our Agency management and, as a result, we are giv
quality, confidential assistance.

s^
o

                                                                                                                CO

-------
o

iu
_i '
OQ











COI ISSUES AND RESOLUTIONS
sl
UJ 1-
£*
Si"
T3 CO £ i_
!. ^i
ffl 8 ® -5 £ m °> to
« £a>£tP£o.Eo>
«5 co£ro§.Cl_fc.o
S.i-'E.gg'IP 8-
"Bs/Jfglg-ScS
% % " S i -5 | « § |
I ° =?^"S 1 S>*H
S"St°a5™£--°
OH!! lit!
.2.cp = 8^=:i=c-§
fllfllflll
oo*-'2<».28' 3
TS CO
S3
•o o) c
C £
m
Is 5
*'|S
v* w 03
Is5
5 ^ S
Ho
" §1
oj o «
5 CB CM"
« °t
1^-2
is S'a
£ S S
Rl DEM has been operating a non-regulatory technical assistance program since 1987. Since
companies and have gained the trust of a majority of them. Conflicts of interest are avoided th
cousins. Coordination with our state's Economic Development Corporation as well as URI's C(
stressing our office's pledge to work with industry in a confidential manner.

_
cc
si
rai
>^ £
f 8
^«
— *
.1 •§.
Q. CD
i|
o 5
1J
!?<*;
s§l
C3) C i-
C CO "o
£>»!
•""«o
^ £ -2
•s CD _*?
5 Ur 0
As inspectors find small businesses that are out of compliance and don't appear to be intentior
the facility the opportunity to come into compliance by recommending they contact our office fo
support of upper management in bringing our program to the table for bureau chiefs to take bai

O
CO











K

Q
CO
>,
o>
I
te
•** c i_
C (D m
CD _e J—
|li
ro ^ £
Q. ^ ±±
® a 5
»2o3
iESi
•^ CO CO
>, « °-
o £ =
?*l
Q. o £
••= S- S
Its5
&*•
< CO ^
ffl^>-
The Department developed and implemented a State Audit Policy, which is very similar to the i
supports SBAP confidentiality. The regulatory programs understand the benefit of confidential!
working with an industry sector, the program will contact the appropriate sector association(s).
assistance programs to ensure that all needs of the business community are met.

z


-------
o

Ul
-1

ffl

RESOLUTIONS
COI ISSUES AND


si
Ul t
wj"
<- _ CD <0 03
ential, and the enforcement division of TNRCC cannot seek
3 work with our enforcement offices on a number of projects, sue
aintain the confidentiality and trust of the businesses that contac
nmented that it gives them confidence and trust to call us. Once
Because we have a high rate of customer satisfaction, we have
iality policy, some businesses are hesitant to contact us, becaus
nt from enforcement.
l§«il|t
CO 00 T3 «3 * o 03
~ CO C .C g 0 -D
S -0 W T C 03 =
§ 1 of § - £ -2
Sll&i ° 8
£ "SI SS!
~ « ~ Q. CD C °
5 ^ £ >,co S $
•K •*• >- .— 3 03 n
TX SBLGA confidentiality policy states: All contac
information regarding these contacts. This policy
as the Metal Finishing and Auto Body/Auto Repa
us. Many businesses appreciate our confidential
business uses our services, they usually contact
large number of repeat callers. Even with the exi
they view us a regulators and do not realize that i

*


inesses (issued 5//20/96).
centives for small bus
c
1
.2
"5
c
£






We have not encountered this problem as yet.

>





E
03
J3
e
a
CQ
03
03
.Q
5
03
C
CO
cc
cc
.c

1

Q_ 03
up of the agency. Also, SBAP currently is housed in a separate
some violators to SBAP for technical assistance to facilitate
3 ensure that small businesses are fairly treated. SBAP does no
However, to ensure that compliance eventually is achieved, SBf
month grace period. The business is not shielded from
tate (or federal) inspectors during this period. Such independent
Bstigation. The DEP Director has given strong assurances that t
1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1
P co fl? **~ y o w
SBAP operates separately and independently fro
physical location. To better help small businesse
compliance. The SBO also intervenes in specific
refer any cases to Enforcement except in the cas
will make on-site assessment files available to Er
enforcement actions related to violations indepen
discovery may occur through routine inspection a
confidentiality of all assistance oroarams shall be

i

CO
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                                                                                       t/t
                                                                                                                                       s
                                                                                                                                       <£
                                                                                                                                       S

-------
               o
               •D

           e _£D >
      
-------

"co
"co
—
rfW o ro
?u 02
5* _ Q.
r~ C
t OTS
Z •>» 3
ui o-o
O ^"J
S QL ^
C
UJ co —
« < ,A
Z Q- CD

g Si
i ^1
O c £
8 |8
Z ra=
o si
^- ^1« ^^
O -^"i
™1 QJ ^
o — J2
^J .. CO
^ -— (jj
5 11
2 S-Q
ui =
|E
< CO
,„ i—
CO Q
O >»
1— .2
CQ o
CO Q.



CO
jy
1 •"£
'"= 'p.
~'O
!-X
§

-1
' -2:
"•^5
, sO
J"
• -1






• ,; i-
C"
• ;//--
- 10
ttl
^^"

,. 2

s<
• ; ^'
o
iSL
IE
; (O
01
' o
,'BQ
_=:-<
CO






S
jy
O
o
a
a.





















z






















cc
z





Alabama





















CC






















cc
z





CO
ca
_co














o
o
CN
^
•o
CO
1C
CD
2
CO
o

<
"ufuj
|.EO
'» CO .
_o co 2s
= ^ c
CO ^gf flj

eo Jf o co

0*= C 33
-^ C ^ (/)
CL'" §5
m® """S
'co E CD w
^~ flj «H •"
E-. ;•? tO Q
£*W O ^
m 75 -Cj ™
Sl^l
^J (flO CO
O .> Q ^
"co|,
o to co

^ jPr O
c ® ^

c
"5.
Q.
CO „;
o -2

c ^
•5 w
Q. _
o c
•O C3
«T3
CO «g
I«
_^ •"
15
t3§
.0> OJ£ §
^i > co co 2
•5 gto w^
Sils-ls
•ocu:og)£
CD > Q. C. *-
S> a^Q.cc
o a>d o> "o
c co o E a
co g o> <»"2

-------
O  §
UJ  C
_j v
03  c
CO
111
H
1 >
K
O
'•.O'
2
z
:.s
o
o
" V*
co



SMALL BUSINESS POLICY ACTIVITIES
s
0£
O
§
o.














^
z
SBO - Yes, Hi's Environmental Audit Policy, gravity-based penalty
states, "Where violations are discovered by means other than
environmental audits or due diligence efforts, but are promptly
disclosed and expeditiously corrected, we would reduce gravity-
based penalties.. .provided that all other conditions of the policy are
met." Economic-based penalty states, "Retain our discretion to
recover economic benefit gained as a result of noncompliance, so
that companies will not be able to obtain an economic advantage
over their competitors by delaying their investment in compliance."
SBAP - Clean Air Program uses above-mentioned Environmental
Audit Policy and tiered enforcement penalty structure in framing all
enforcement actions.


"co
^
CO
I











,
o
"ti
o













o:
z
z
_>,
o
c
i
_Q














^
Z
The policy is available,. but we have not had an occasion to use it.

CO
c
CI
'a.














6
o
Z
Seventeen companies have used the policy since its adoption in
1995. No companies used the policy in 2000.


V
c
'co
2












[£
Z
o:
z

T3
C
CI
£
CI
•c
CM

-------
O

















"O
o
c
1
MH
O
O,








to
tu
fi
,~'l~
o
-. ><
cS
v-J
:2
ifc
^!'S
•"->«
1 O
o
.?^
;•<
;*


_ ;>
'

<&
UJ
H-
• " ->
SMALL BUSINESS POLICY AC

S
g
0
o
fl£
D.
















o:


&
o
Q.
CD
CD
CO
3
We have recommended to companies that they
ID
•4— '
0>
CO
3
€
CO
o>
%
^















2
1
0> ^ ID a fe
i|l5g •§ *
^{l^i^ciii
«o^«?3a3"§iu.2
£8g:li^te2£^l
We continue to use the Compliance Incentives
principle for program operation. We strongly er
to take advantage of the policy, as it provides "f
punitive actions while rewarding proactive activi
been active in developing a NH-specific Compli
Response Policy that provides opportunities for
receive compliance assistance from the agency
met. As with the federal policy, the NH policy fii
education, outreach, and direct assistance to in
operators of their obligations and reserves enfo
those businesses that choose to ignore their re:
&
^
CO
Q.
E
CO
X
Z















tt.




{£.


&
£
0)
z















K




CC.
Z


8
X
CD
Z
                                                                                                            CO

-------
(9
UJ
               o-5 «sl.i'g-c.pUJ.i S| S'lS «

-------
o
UJ
C
V
5
o
o
: •„•


CO
, Ul
t

; £
o
<
1
o
CL
fe
Z.
i

0
0
: J-
,..J
'"<
(O




-'

SMALL BUSINESS POLICY ACTIVITIES


<
K
§
K
0.




















<

11
C t*-
0> CD

By using the Incentive Policy, the penalty assessed by Enfor
was mitigated after the facility received compliance assistant:
SBAP.
CO
_c
1
CO
0
-C
*-^
3
O
CO



















C£




K.

CO
1
CO
O
£
3
0
03


















CD
C
o

_o
Ic

TN developed a self-policing and voluntary correction policy,
was developed using SBAP compliance incentives for small
businesses. The provision allows a company to correct a
compliance problem provided certain conditions are met.


CD
S
8!
c
c
CD
"£ <"
si £
s|s« •"„
-— Q) *r~ ^3 " CO
"o £ '1 — 15 •S'.ffi
°-o iw^cwxi
>,"£ c J= ® E = £
= i i ~ £ £ ® js
CQ C M _ **- O -C
n* >% O C ^ m — c
li^SSl^J
.§l«Efe.c°o
i •;. £ _ 2 o>-£ « «;
issJ8H"»
CO CD "S "3 §"•= CO o c
§l>gl^Sci
•§x§S«c>S--|
§ .I±58,S||
i»li§s§H=
^I5|l§l8|
Q5c^£cj^oc
i|a-^il|2
i gS-^^-S-12
l8cDi?g™S8
co = .£EoiS<|
•Sp efiS'So c-i
c= — ^Ssoa3-S2
"JlilHIi
.2-25® i§g
C T« C! O CO T-i C M 21
s;5-— coSSsJEoc
g.^: OT S g £ !>.
CD >»!2 ^
The agency's Enforcement Division does not have any polici<
exclusively for small businesses. However, the majority of
enforcement actions initiated in the regions that are informal!
resolved involve small businesses. Informal resolution mean
the violations were resolved between the inspector and the
regulated entity without the case going through the formal
enforcement process and without the assessment of a penall



CO
X
£



















CH
Z



tr
z




^
m
*V
0



















CK




OH



O
£
$


















CD
§




1
1
0
a
£
CO
£
_c
"5
o"



CO
'c
e"
>



















f£
Z



a:

CO
•a
CO
_cc
c
'ro
L_
>



















o:




C£


Q
O)
!c
CO
CO



















a:




K

CO
'c
"2»
>
to
1



















K
Z
i^i
ES ®
W§£
en -i i_
Wl DNR Office of Enforcement chose not to implement EPA'i
Business Policy. Instead, the state continues to rely on its ci
enforcement discretion policy that provides more flexibility fo
business community.



1C
"(0
o
o
<0


-------
       CO
       uj

      ' H




       I


       O


       o
       Q.
       O
       o
o §
UJ C
_j s
00 <=
CO
Ul
E


I

I

o
QL
CO
I

35
00
       (O
       O
       o
       Of
       Q.
               to
               05
   i--C.fi


   OT3(£

£ .»_c co a.
a
         pS:
         5UJ^.

         ?u
         2§»
           is
          'j=.£S
          i ȣ
    S c »
    •o|8
    -gsl
    I a.3

    I?"
Busi
material p
isplays a
i the smal
         W -.- CO T3 S $

         iillH
   li^lli
   lilfll
          : = E
                ra
   o
                                                            CO

-------
O  §
LLJ  c

                           (0
                           0
                          •£. •

                          21

                           o«
                          ,<*,
oc.
fc
o:
(±
on
a:
a:
a:
a:
                                                                                                          cr:
                                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                                    CO
                                                                                                                    £
                                                                                                                    o
                                           N
              CD
              a
              o
              o
                                                             O
                                                                 O
                                                                      LLJ
                            O
                                                  o

-------
o
UJ
        Ui
               : C

               '''S.\
                ;§s
               ;<
               too
              J*~;
                b§
                a
                                                                             CO
                                 oo
                                         a:
a:
cr:
o:
                     CO
                           tfc
                                 LU
                                                  CO

-------
^
o §
ill c
-I 5S
CO C
§^0
^K ^** ••»
                      w.
                      C:  ',

                     s>
                     5f
                      C3
                    _ to
                   ••»=> -
                   w
                   •v
                    U1Q.O
                    «0
          t«
           a
S

?
                                o
                                z
                                    o:
                              o;
                              T

                              O
on
          cc.
                                                                                   a:
                                                                                                         s
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         z

                                                                                                         i





                                                                                                         I
          (XL
              a:
o
CO
                                                                       CO

-------
o
UJ

-------