SECOND UNITED STATES-JAPAN




     GOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE ON




       SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT




       September 24-25, 1974




         Washington, D. C.




              U.S.A.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS


   I.  Schedule of Travel for Complete Trip of Japanese Delegation
       to Second U.S.-Japan Conference on Solid Waste Management

  II.  Program of Second U.S.-Japan Conference on Solid Waste
       Management

 III.  Conference Participants

  IV.  Escorting Personnel on Field Tour

   V.  Introductory Comments by H. Lanier Hickman, Jr.

  VI.  Presentation by H. Lanier Hickman, Jr.

            The Federal Solid Waste Management Program,
              A Review and Prognosis, by H. Lanier Hickman, Jr.

 VII.  Presentation by Robert Colonna

            Decision-Makers' Guide in Solid Waste Management,
              chapters on Collection and Transportation(See EPA
                                                           Publication
VIII.  Presentation by George Garland                      SW-127)

            Decision-Makers' Guide in Solid Waste Management,
              chapters on Processing and Disposal(see EPA Publication
                          		    SW-127)
            National Cities, October 1974, article:  Dumpst
              A Potential Threat to our Groundwater Supplies,
              by Bruce Weddle and George Garland

  IX.  Presentation by William Sanjour

            Hazardous Waste Management in the United States,
              by William Sanjour

   X.  Presentation by J. Nicholas Humber

            Resource Recovery in the United States, by
              J. Nicholas Humber

            Energy Conservation Through Improved Solid Waste
              Management, by Robert A. Lowe

            Markets and Technology for Recovery of Energy
              from Solid Waste, by Steven J.Levy

-------
            Solid-Waste-as-Fuel Systems

            Solid Waste Pyrolysis Systems

            Pyrolysis of Municipal Solid Waste/  by Steven J.  Levy

  XI.  Presentation by Tsutomu Fukuda

            Present Condition of Solid Waste Management/  by
              Tsutomu Fukuda and Tadayuki Morishita

 XII.  Presentation by Mitsuo Nakano

            Collection and Transportation of Household Solid
              Wastes/ by Mitsuo Nakano

XIII.  Presentation by Takashi Miyanohara

            Actual Conditions in Refuse Management in Japanese
              Cities/ by Takashi Miyanohara

            Treatment of Leachate and Gases Discharged from
              Landfill Sites/ by Takashi Miyanohara

 XIV.       Presentation by Tadayuki Morishita

            Treatment of Toxic Wastes/ by Tsutomu Fukuda and
              Tadayuki Morishita

            Recent Aspects of Solid Waste Management in Japan/
              1974, Solid Waste Management Programs Division,
              Ministry of Health and Welfare/ Japanese Government

  XV.  Presentation by Michio Nakajiku

            Resource Recovery from Municipal Solid Waste in
              Japan/ by Sukehiro Gotoh and Michio Nakajiku

 XVI.  Joint Communique

XVII.  Press Release in Environmental News

-------
                                  Schedule of Travel
Arrived Montreal
Wed.     Sept 18
Departed Montreal
Arrived Baltimore
 Departed  Baltimore
 Arrived Washington
 Departed  Washington
 Arrived St.  Louis
 Departed  St.  Louis
 Arrived Memphis
^Departed  Memphis
Thurs.

Fri.
Sat.
Sun.
Mon.
Fri
                                        19
          11    20
          .1    21
          11    22
          "    23
Tues.     "   24
Wed.      "   25
Thurs.    "   26
                                    11     II
              27
 5:15 p.m.      by AC-749
               stayed at Sheraton Mt.  Royal
                 Hotel
 in p.m.        Mr. Grey arrived and met
                 delegation at hotel
 all  day       ISWA sessions
  "   "        ISWA sessions
  "   "        free time, visited Montreal
 9:15 a.m.      EA-173
11:29 a.m.      Mr. Sussman met with
                 transportation
 in p.m.        visited Baltimore demonstration
                 project
 late p.m.      by official car
  evening      stayed at Channel Inn Motel
  all day      U.S.-Japan Conference

  9:45 a.m.    TW-461
 10:41 a.m.    Mr. Holloway met with
                 transportation
               stayed at Stouffer's
                 Riverfront Inn
  in p.m.      visited St. Louis
                 demonstration project
  8:00 a.m.    SO-321
  8:48 a.m.    plane connection
  9:30 a.m.    SO-219

-------
Arrived Orlando
Frl.    Sept 27
Departed Orlando

Arrived Atlanta

Departed Atlanta

Arrived San
  Francisco
                     Sat.
         "   28
                              n    n
Sun.
Mon.
n 29 " "
" 30 8:05 a.m
" " 9:13 a.m
10:33 a.m
12:08 p.m
                              II    II
Departed San
  Francisco
Tues.   Oct.  1


Wed.     "    2

Thurs.   "    3
12:05 p.m.     Mr. James met with
                 transportation
               stayed at Kahler Plaza Inn

 in p.m.       visited high water table
                 landfill

 in a.m.       visited solid waste
                 management facilities at
                 Disney World

 in p.m.       free time, visited Disney
                 World

               free time

               DL-1101

               plane connection

               DL-823

               transportation by car rental
               stayed at Sir Francis
                 Drake Hotel

 in p.m.       free time

 all day       visited Stefanelli operations
                 and Mountain View landfill

               free time

12:30 p.m.     PA-001

-------
             II
         PROGRAM
SECOND U.S.-JAPAN CONFERENCE
 ON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

-------
   THEME:  Optimization of Solid Waste Management Services


Tuesday, September 24

  9:00-9:10 a.m.

    Opening of Conference, Mr. Hickman, Chairman
    Welcoming Remarks, Mr. Green

  9:10-9:15

    Welcoming Remarks, Mr. Strelow

  9:15-9:20

    Welcoming Remarks, Mr. Darnay

  9:20-9:25

    Introduction to the Conference, Conference
      Chairman, Mr. Hickman

  9:25-9:30

    Introduction to the Conference, Chairman of
      the Japanese Delegation, Mr. Fukuda

  9:30-9:45

    General Comments by APWA Representative,
      Mr. Fleming

  9:45-10:00

    General Comments by NSWMA Representative,
      Mr. Wingerter

 10:00-10:15

    Status of Solid Waste Management in the United States;
      Summary, Mr. Hickman

    U.S. Paper:  The Federal Solid Waste Management
      Program; Review  and Prognosis, by H. Lanier Hickman

-------
10:15-10:45

  General Discussion of U.S.  Paper

10:45-11:00

  Coffee Break

11:00-11:15

  Status of Solid Waste Management in Japan; Summary
    Mr. Fukuda

  Japanese Paper:  Present Condition of Solid Waste
    Management,  by Tsutomu Fukuda and Tadayuki Morishita

11:15-11:45

  General Discussion of Japanese Paper

11:45-11:50

  Administrative Matters, Conference Chairman

11:50-1:30 p.m.

  Luncheon:  Hosts, NSWMA.  Pier 7 Restaurant, Channel Inn

1:30-1:45

  Collection and Transportation of Wastes in the United
    States; Summary, Mr. Colonna

  U.S. Paper:  Decision-Makers' Guide in Solid Waste
    Management,  Chapters on Collection and Transportation

1:45-2:45

  General Discussion of U.S.  Paper

2:45-3:00

  Coffee Break

3:00-3:15

  Collection and Transportation of Wastes in Japan;
    Summary Mr.  Nakano

  Japanese Paper:  Collection and Transportation of
    Household Solid Wastes/by Mitsuo Nakano

-------
3:15-4:15

  General Discussion of Japanese Paper

4:15-4:30

  Closing Comments for the Day, Conference Chairman

About 4:30 p.m.

  Adjournment

7:00-8:30

  Reception for Japanese Delegation at Home of
    Mr. and Mrs. Hickman

  Transportation for Delegation provided by EPA

Wednesday, September 25

9:00 a.m.

  Open Second-day Session

9:00-9:15

  Disposal of Wastes in the United States; Summary,
    Mr. Garland

  U.S. Paper:  Decision-Makers' Guide in Solid Waste
    Management, Chapters on Processing and Disposal

9:15-10:00

  General Discussion of U.S. Paper

10:00-10:15

  Disposal of Wastes in Japan; Summary, Mr. Miyanohara

  Japanese Paper:  Actual Conditions in Refuse Management
    in Japanese Cities and Treatment of Leachate and Gase<
    Discharged from Landfill, by Takashi Miyanohara

-------
11:00-11:15

  Coffee Break

11:15-11:30

  Hazardous Waste Management in the United States;
    Summary, Mr. Sanjour

  U.S. Paper:  Hazardous Waste Management in the
    United States, by Mr. San^our

11:30-12:15 p.m.

  General Discussion of U.S. Paper

12:15-1:30

  Luncheon:  Hosts, Japanese Embassy, Flagship Restaurant

1:30-1:45

  Hazardous Waste Management in Japan; Summary, Mr. Fududa/
    Mr. Morishita

  Japanese Paper:  Treatment of Toxic Wastes, by Tsutomu
    Fukuda and Tadayuki Morishita

1:45-2:30

  General Discussion of Japanese Paper

2:30-2:45

  Resource Recovery in the United States; Summary,
    Mr. Humber

2:30-2:45

  U.S. Papers:

    Resource Recovery in the United States, by J. Nicholas
      Humber

    Energy Conservation Through Improved Solid Waste
      Management, by Robert A. Lowe

-------
    Markets and Technology for Recovery of  Energy  from
      Solid Waste,  by Steven J.  Levy

    Solid-Waste-as-Fuel Systems

    Solid Waste Pyrolysis Systems

    Pyrolysis of Municipal Solid Waste, by  Steven  J.  Levy

2:45-3:30

  General Discussions of U.S. Papers

3:30-3:45

  Coffee Break

3:45-4:00

  Resource Recovery in Japan; Summary,  Mr.  Nakajiku

  Japanese Paper:  Resource Recovery from Municipal
    Solid Waste in Japan, by Michio Nakajiku and
    Sukehiro Gotoh

4:00-4:45

  General Discussion of Japanese Paper

4:45-5:00

  Closing Statements of Conference Chairman, and Chairman
    of the Japanese Delegation

  Issuance of Joint Statement

  Conference Adjournment

-------
                               Ill
                   CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS
Japan

  Mr. Tsutomu Fukuda (Chairman of Delegation)
  Director, Water Supply and Environment Department
  Ministry of Health and Welfare

  Mr. Tadayuki Morishita
  Head, Office for Industrial Wastes Management
  Water Supply and Environment Department
  Ministry of Health and Welfare

  Mr. Michio Nakajiku
  Project Manager, Office of Research and
    Development Programs
  Agency of Industrial Science and Technology
  Ministry of International Trade and Industry

  Mr. Mitsuo Nakano
  Head, Urban Road Division
  City Bureau
  Ministry of Construction

  Mr. Takashi Miyanohara
  Assistant Division Director, Environmental
    Cleaning Bureau
  Yokohama City

  Mr. Katsuhiko Suetsugu (Observer)
  Business Correspondent, Industrial News Department
  Editorial Bureau
  Nippon Keizai Shinbun Co.

-------
United States

  H. Lanier Hickman (Conference Chairman)
  Director of Operations for Solid Waste
    Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  Fitzhugh Green
  Associate Administrator for International Activities
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  Roger Strelow
  Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste Management
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  Arsen J. Darnay
  Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste
    Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  Robert A. Colonna
  Director, Systems Management Division
  Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  George Garland
  Deputy Director, Systems Management Division
  Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  William Sanjour
  Hazardous Waste Management Division
  Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  J. Nicholas Kumber
  Director, Resource Recovery Division
  Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  Rodney F. Fleming
  Executive Secretary, Institute for Solid Wastes
  American Public Works Association  (APWA)

  Eugene Wingerter
  Executive Director
  National Solid Waste Management Association  (NSWMA)

-------
                             IV
            Escorting Personnel on Field Tour
Valentine Grey (escort)
Senior Staff Officer
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
David Sussman
Project Officer, Baltimore Demonstration Project
Resource Recovery Division
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
J. Robert Holloway
Project Officer, St. Louis Demonstration Project
Resource Recovery Division
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Stephen C. James
Project Officer, Orange County Demonstration Project
Systems Management Division
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
                         V
                  INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS

                 H. Lanier Hickman, Jr.
     It is a great pleasure for our country and Agency
to host our solid waste management colleagues from Japan.
We only hope that our hospitality can match yours when
we were your guests in 1973.

     We think it is significant that in the midst of the
many energy and materials problems that face the world,
that our two countries can meet to discuss solid waste
management.  It is significant because solid waste manage-
ment can be and in many instances is a factor which can
provide help in alleviating our energy and materials
needs.

     We want this meeting to provide an open exchange
of knowledge and experiences.  It should help us to better
relate our important national and international roles in
the world's economy.  Our experience tells us that pro-
fessionals working in a particular field can achieve
measurable results working together regardless of language
and cultural differences.  We know that this conference will
achieve measurable results.

     We look forward to this conference establishing a
foundation for greater future cooperation between our two
countries.

-------
                            VI
         -THE FEDERAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

                   A REVIEW AND PROGNOSIS

                 by H. Lanier Hickman,  Jr.*
     The responsibilities and authorities for solid waste,

management in the United States are divided among the three

formal levels of government:  Federal,  State, and local.

(county or city).   Each level has discrete as well as shared

activities.

     The base of legal authorities in the U.S.A.  stems from

the Constitution of the United States,  which provides for

certain governmental functions to be provided by each level

of government.  Domestic Federal Governmental functions

are based on the concept of interstate relationships, i.e.,

activities which cross State boundaries.  State government

functions pertain to all chose aspects of governmental

services within their boundaries, and individual State

constitutions divide responsibilities between State and

local government.   These responsibilities actually restrict

what each level of government does, thereby protecting

individual rights  and interests.
     '•'Mr. liickr.an is Director of Operations for Solid Waste
l::.^.j.'v?r>en^ Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agancy.

-------
                  Federal Pzsvpnsibil'i,ties

     Present Federal Government authority in  solid waste

management is provided by the Solid Waste Disposal Act
                    i
(Public Law 91-512) ,, as amended.   This  law was  originally

passed by the Federal Congress in October 1965,  amended in

October 1970 and extended in 1973.  It will expire the end

of June 1974 and will need amending or extending by  that

time.  In the initial sections of the law,  the responsibility

of government is reviewed.  Simply stated,  the Act defines

the responsibility of local and State government to  be that

of collection and disposal of solid waste.  It further

states, however, that the nature and dimensions  of the solid

waste problem in the United States require Federal action,

in order to make possible the practices  of proper and economical

solid waste management by State and local governments.  The

Federal solid x^aste programs activities, as defined  by the

Act, are briefly described below:

     Pol-Lcy Formulation.  The interactions and direction of

solid waste management must be articulated to the Nation so

that government, industry, and individual citizens will

support the actions necessary to provide both, effective and

economical solid waste mar.agement and protection of  the

environment.

-------
                              3



     Eessaz-ch and D-3-jeI op iris fit•_.   The development of new and



improved techniques for solid waste management requires



government action, not commonly associated with local/State



government.  Research and development is a logical function.



of Federal Government because of national needs and the



costs of research.



     Demonstration.  The demonstration of new emerging



technology and systems is both expensive and unpredictable.



As with research, the breadth of national needs and high



costs almost dictate that the Federal Government support



this activity.



     Technical Assistance.  The provision of highly skilled



technical expertise to assist local government and industry



in dealing with their solid waste problems has long been a



traditional role of Federal Government.  This activity



provides manpower to supplement State government technical.



assistance activities, to improve currant systems, and to



place new systems in operation.



     Planning Solid Vaste Management Systems.  The original



Solid T/7aste Disposal Act authorized Federal grants to State



governments to help them develop long-range plans for their



Sraces.   This authority provided a mechanisms by which, the



Federal Government could assist the State government in the



formulation of strategies to meet their responsibilities as



described by the Act.

-------
                "•"•"frฎ existing Act provides  the Federal.
Government with authority to train solid waste  personnel in


State and local government and private industry directly, to


help universities establish college curricula on solid waste


management, and to determine the national  manpower needs of


solid waste management .


     State-of-the-Artf Studies.  When the Federal Government


first began to exercise initiatives in solid waste management,


information on solid waste technology was  indeed, sparse.  If


solid waste management systems are to meet their objectives f


knowledge regarding acceptable technology, systems, and


approaches must be provided.  To provide  such, material, the


existing Act authorizes studies to be made of existing


technology to define in qualitative, quantitative, and


comparative terms the application and acceptability of that


technology.


     Public In format-ion.  Only an informed technical and lay


public is capable of making wise decisions on issues that


affect the well-being of the individual,  the government, and


the Nation.  Existing authorities allow for the expending of


funds to inform the American public about solid wasta

          2
management .

-------
                              5



                   State R33pons'L'bi1_i'ti,23



     The activities of State government  parallel  those of



the Federal Government in many areas.  State  government has



better opportunities than the Federal  Government  to  inter-



relate with local governments and people because  of  the



proximity of State government and their  perception of local



problems.  Nothing prevents State government  from executing



a program corresponding to all areas of  the Federal



solid waste management programs except the limitations of



economics and practicality, but because  of these  limitations,



little State effort has been directed  to research and development,



state-of-the-art studies and the demonstration of new and



improved technology.  In the areas of  policy  formulation,



technical assistance, planning, training,  and public information,



however, State solid waste activities  are  very similar to



Federal activities, except that the scope  is  directed at



State/local problems and that these activities tend  to be



more detailed and specific to those problems.



     The most important and demanding  role of State  government,



and one that doss not now rest with the  Federal Government,



is the establishment and subsequent enforcement of solid



wasce standards.  Presently, within their  constitutional



authorities, State governments are responsible for the



quality of operations of solid waste management systems within

-------
                              6



th-sir respective States.3  Most states  presently have  legal



authorities to enforce solid waste standards.  A significant



number of States base these authorities on old and limited



laws governing nuisances and health.  However, some 15



States have recently enacted solid waste legislation, that



broadens and strengthens the role of  State government,



particularly in relation to standard-setting and. enforcement,








                   Local R3svonsibi.liti.es



     Local government sees that solid waste is properly



managed from storage—through processing and recovery—to



final disposal.  At the local level,  solid waste is generated



from residences, commercial enterprises, and industrial



activities.  The collection, treatment, and disposal of



these wastes are accomplished by both governmental forces



and private contractors. "*ป s  Industries frequently manage



their own solid waste which result from process  lines, but



have their general plant-type waste collected and disposed



of by private or public forces.  By far the greater part of



industrial and commercial solid wastes  are collected by



private contractors.  The majority of processing and disposal



facilities are oxvTiad and operated by local government



agencies, cities and counties.  All of these operations must



r.aet State standards and require technology and systems to



serve their citizens.

-------
               The  Federal Solid  Waste Management  Programs—19.66-1970

               As has  been reviewed earlier, the original Federal

          legislation  in solid waste management was  the Solid Waste

          Disposal  Act of 1965, subsequently amended by the Resource

          Recovery  Act of 1970.L   It seems logical to review the

          progress  made by the Federal program and the nation, iir a way

          compatable with the legislative history,  i.e.,. 1966-1970?

          1971-1973; 1974 and the future.  Except  for 1965 and  1973,

          the funding  for the Federal program has  averaged about $14.3

          million per  year (Table 1).



                                       Table 1

                          FEDERAL SOLID WASTE PROGRAM BUDGET

                                      1966-1974

                                   (By Fiscal Year)

                                      (xlOOO8)
                   1966    1967    1968   1969
                             1970
     1971    1972    1973    1974
Danonstration
  Grants

r l^nriiag 0r ?.nc 3

fr'iinin'7 Orr.r.tis
2,000   5,000   4,700  5,100   4,600   3,700   1,000  27,000

  ^00   1,000   1,500  1,900   1,500   1,300   2,700   3,700
150
350
450
500
400  1,000
                                             250   1,300
                     850   1,700   2,300   2,400   2,COO   1,700   2,000
                                                    450
 i^2cc Oper-iii^ns
  hcljcU — ccnrracts)   920   4,200   4,4QQ   5,200   6,SOP  10,200   8,000  11,400 	

                   4,320  12,250  13,350  15,100  15,300  17,900  13,950  43,350  14,800

-------
                                         8

               At the beginning  of  the program, major emphasis was

          placed on learning as  much as possible about the practice

          and technology of solid waste mangemant throughout the  U.S.,

          and on assisting States through the State planning grant

          program.  The funds  expended for State solid waste agency

          support from fiscal  years 1966 through 1973 totalled, over

          $10 mil.li.on to aid 49  states in developing plans which

          establish long-term  solid waste management strategies for

          State government (Table 2) .



                                       Table 2

                      STATE SOLID  WASTE PLANNING GIIANT EXPENDITURES



                    FY 66   FY 67   FY 68  FY 69   FY 70   FY 71  FY 72   FY  73   TOTAL


Timber of States
 Supported              14      31      36     35     31     32     32      34      49

Tocal Federal Funds
 by Year (000)          500   .1000   1,300  1,600   1,400   1,200  1,200   2,000  10,200




          Most of the States have completed their plans and all,

          whether through  the  planning phase or  not,  are  in some stage

          of implementation.

-------
                              9
     In determining the condition of solid waste management
in the U.S., two surveys were conducted--one  of municipally-
owned operations, and one related to privately-owned operations.
     Many research and demonstration projects were  initiated
and many were completed.  All were not successful from, the
standpoint of being able to apply what was learned, but the
fact that some projects proved that the concepts were not
practical is, in itself, a useful contribution,  to the field.
During the years 1966 to 1970, some $21 inilliou- was invested
in demonstrating new or improved approaches and technologies
for solid waste management.
     Notable successes include the advancement  of improved
rural solid waste collection systems and technology5; the
implementation of a true regional solid waste authority7;
arid the advancement of shredding of solid waste as  a viable
unit operation.8  Many more have been reported  on and the
reports are available from our Agency the U.S-  Environmental
Protection Agency. 2'9   In fact,~ from the period 1966-through.
1970, 450 publications were produced by the Federal solid
waste program in order to make available the  results of the
Federal program.
     One of the major areas of activity that  resulted in
significant and important outputs was the Investigative effort
leading up to th.a state-of-the-art reports on sanitary

-------
                              10
landfill. 
-------
                              11



services or limited and inadequate service.'  Finally,  we



were able to determine that costs to individual  cities and



citizens for this inadequate national municipal  solid waste



management systems exceeded in the aggregate some $4.5



billion.  Figure 1 summarizes these findings in  some, detail



and is provided as an overview of the status of  solid, waste



management in the U.S. at the end of 1970.








     The Federal Solid Waste Management Program--1971-1973



     The learning process of 1966-1970 served as a foundation



to develop staff, begin state programs, and chart the



directions for the nation in solid waste management.  Also,



a new piece of Federal solid waste legislation was enacted



in October 1970—The Resource Recovery Act  of 197O.1  The



amended Act came at the same time that the  new Environmental



Protection Agency (EPA) was established in  the Federal



Government.  The Federal Solid Waste Program became part of



Z?A as the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs  (OSWMP) .



     This Act, while still authorizing a continuation of



past work, also authorized several new significant activities



and studies:  (1) the establishment: of guidelines;  (2)



hazardous wastes; (3) resource recovery; (4) solid waste



management manpower.

-------
                              12



                  The guidelines efforts mandated by  the
Act were a natural extension of the state-of-the-art work



begun in 1966.  The guidelines developed will,  in effect, be



mandatory standards for Federal government  solid waste



management operations and will be a strong  guide for State



agency standard setting.  Naturally,  the first  two guidelines



developed were for sanitary landfill and incineration, both.



based on the aforementioned state-of-the-art reports.12



     Hazardous Wastes.  The Resource Recovery Act also required



that the Federal solid waste program initiate a detailed



study of hazardous waste management in the  U.S. and provide



a report to the Congress of the United States.  The report



was formally submitted to Congress in the  fall  of 1973. l3



     The major findings of that report indicated that  the



asount of hazardous waste generated in the U.S. was 10 million



tons annually and growing at a 5 to 10% annual  rater  that our



current management practices were unacceptable; that because



o_" increasing air and water pollution regulations, more and



more of these hazardous wastes were going  on the  land and



the regulations (Federal, State and local)  to protect the land



were inadequate and usually non-existent;  thera was  little



or a 3 sure on generators  to do a good job of disposal;  that



ts-hnology, while availabla for many wastes, was  not  utilized;

-------
                              13



and that a. combination of Federal and State action was



necessary to regulate these waste materials to  assure



proper management.



     Resource Recovery.  The most far-ranging change in the



amended Solid Waste Disposal Act related to resource recovery.



Because of the long-term impacts of material usage patterns,



initiatives by the Federal government into resource recovery



areas moves remarkably away from the rather routine purposes



of today's solid waste management system.   Congress directed



the Federal solid waste management program to study and



determine ways to recover materials and energy  from solid.



waste; ways to reduce the amount of solid waste;  analyze



changes in solid waste management systems to bring about



increased resource recovery; determine how to use Federal



procurement to stimulate resource recovery; assess the



impact of current taxing procedures on the utilization of



secondary materials; and analyze how public policies affect



ar.d can affect resource recovery.



     The Federal solid waste management program is required



to report on the findings of these studies annually.  The



first reporc was submitted to the Congress in October 1972.""'



The emphasis of the first resource recovery report is on the



recovery of materials and energy from mixed municipal wastes



r.r.d. other "post-consumer" wastes that are discarded outside

-------
                              14



the normal waste collection channels.   The report  indicates



that although only 57<, of the total national solid  waste



load, post-consumer wastes tend to have the most frequent



population impact in that they occur in the nation's  urbanized



areas.  Most materials recovered in the U.S.  today are



derived from industrial fabrication wastes, but post-consumer



wastes are also recovered to some extent (wastepaper, old



automobiles) but not in the quantities necessary to bring



about a shift in the balance of disposal/recovery.. However,



the proportion of the nation's materials requirements satisfied



from recycling materials has remained constant or  has declined



in most instances.  Some of the reasons for this,  the report



goes on to discuss, indicate that artificial economic subsidies



minimize the recovery of secondary materials; the  economics



of recycling are also influenced by apparently inequitable



freight rates—both ocean and rail--which make the transportation



of secondary materials relatively more costly than the



movement of virgin resources.



     Although technology development is adequate to extract,



materials and energy from mixed municipal wastes,  few full-



scale recovery plants exist, primarily because the costs of



recovery plants are high, making recovery by technological



cleans attrative only in areas where high disposal costs



prevail and local markets for the waste materials exist; and

-------
                                15
  that recovery by separate collection was  judged  to be
  feasible if an existing collection system is used.
       The report also indicated that resource recovery results
  in lower quantities of atompsheric emissions, waterborne
  wastes, mjnlng and solid wastes,  and energy consumption, and
  as pressure increases to bring about environmentally sound
  waste disposal, the costs of disposal will rise  and  recovery
  will become more attractive as an alternative.   Finally, the
  report indicates that as air and  water  pollution control
  regulations are intensified, the  incentives of industry for
• using secondary materials will improve  and Federal incentives
  for recycling do not appear to be desirable to bring about
  increased resource recovery.
       While the second annual Resource Recovery report to
  Congress is not in final form, the findings and  conclusions
  may be discussed.1-5  The second report  concentrated  on
  indepth studies of specific waste material streams,  taxing
  and transportation policies and detailed  some of the general
  conclusions drawn in the initial  report.
       The report indicates that local government  is now
  beginning to seriously consider resource  recovery as an
  alternative to more established solid waste management methods;
  energy recovery from municipal solid was re is a  very viable

-------
                              16



alternative; and that the recovery of newsprint and paperboard



is a growing opportunity for municipal systems while there



are supply and technological problems in recovering glass,



metal, rubber and plastic.  It is prophetic that these findings



occur at a time when the world faces severe energy and



materials shortages.  These shortages as they intensify will



make secondary materials one of the most valuable commodities



in our Nation~



     So lid Waste Management Manpower.  The final direct



charge covered in the amended Solid Waste Disposal A.ct, as



amended by the Resource Recovery Act, required the Federal



solid waste management program to initiate a manpower study *



to:  determine current and future manpower needs for solid



waste management in the U.S., and to report to the Congress



on the findings.



     The report disclosed that over 300,000 people worked in



solid waste management; that only about 350 full time



employees were working at the State level; that salaries



appeared to be competitive with similar industrial operations;



that turnover in unskilled positions was high; that wide



variations of employee absenteeism existed; that there was



little advar.cerr.er.t opportunities because of a very  snail



career ladder; that there were extremely high accident rcites

-------
                              17



with operating personnel;  that there was  an available labor



pool for the unskilled levels of personnel;  and,  that



significant increases in job numbers were not anticipated.16



     Continuation of Past  Work.   In addition to  the special



studies and reports required by the Congress, the Federal



solid waste program (GST-iMP) continued to  carry out a variety



of programs in research, demonstration, planning, and.



technical assistance.



     The demonstration program following  over four; years of



technology studies {1966-1970) gradually  shifted to programs



to demonstrate the institutional changes  necessary to



upgrade the management, financing,  and operation of local



solid waste management systems.   Emphasis clearly reflected



a shifting of national policy away  from the view that



hardware/technology could solve the problem to a national



understanding that we were not using what we had, and the



reasons were not technical, but institutional.  Consequently,



ws are experimenting with a variety of new financing



approaches, new organizational arrangements, and utilization



of management systems not  normally  practiced by  local



government to try to bring about improvements.



     During the 1971 to 1973 period, the  technical assistance



role of the Federal solid waste program emerged  as a major



factor in improving U.S. solid waste management:  practices.

-------
                              18
Assistance efforts in the collection  field were able  to
clearly illustrate that productivity  of  the nation's  local
waste management systems was  highly inefficient and that
substantial savings could be  gained by the utilization; of
routing and management techniques  developed by the Federal
program.  In city after city, OSWC? professional personnel
were able to demonstrate improvement  through  the application
of these techniques.
     New techniques for problem assessment and solving were
developed by OSWMP.  In order to transfer the new  techniques
developed by OST/7MP, a series  of programs were launched to
train public works officials, consultant engineers, and
systems operators in the OSWMP techniques.  Coupled with
these efforts in the technical and scientific communities,
were programs directed to the political  decision-makers  at
the State and local level to  stimulate support for changes
needed.  The major techniques developed, and  now being used
in technical assistance, include:
     COLMIS.  The Collection  Management  Information  System
(COLMIS) provides inforaation to identify areas of high
cost, compares crew and operation performance, estimates the
effect of changes in the system, and projects trends.  The
total information makes up a  data bank which  is maintained
for the ready assessment: of operational  and cost  analysis.

-------
                              19



     HACr.3-S.OUTING.  Macro-routing is a procedure for



determining the optimum assignment of collection routes to



disposal facilities.



     DISTRICTING AND ROUTE BALANCING.  Districting and route



balancing is a procedure to determine what a fair day's work



is and to divide collection areas into equal workloads for



each crew.



     HEURISTIC ROUTING OR MACRO-ROUTING.  Heuristic or



macro-routing is a simple, non-computerizedf common sense



approach to minimizing the non-collection distance and times



for each collection vehicle.  Because of its simplicity,



heuristic routing has the added advantage of rapid application



by local officials.



     FIVE-STAGE IMPROVEMENT PROCESS.  This process is a logical



common sense process which enables a critical evaluation and



redesign of collection systems.  It guides the user from.



the initial policy decision and design phases through actual



inp lament at i on .   The five stages of the process ara:  (1) review



policy methodology; (2) determine assignment of collection



areas to disposal sites; (3) determine a fair day's work; (4)



reroute Che system; (5) implement the desired changes and



ir.orovatr.ents .

-------
                              20
     What we learned and what happened from 1966  to 1973
have charted the course of solid waste management in the
U.S.A. for the future and particularly for the Federal, solid
waste program.  In summary, the following benchmarks have
taken place since 1966.
     1.   State solid waste agencies have been, established,
          in all states, 43 have developed their  plans., the
          remainder are in some stage of plan completion.,.
          and implementation is beginning in many places.
          Of particular interest is that some States are now
          beginning to consider and/or establish statewide
          resource recovery systems.
     2.   Knowledge of technology has been advanced to the
          point that we know what can be used and what can.11
          and what are the major questions still needing
          research and development.
     3.   Manpower needs are being met without major new
          development programs.
     4.   Currant systems can be improved by the applications,
          through cechnical assistance, of the knowledge
          we've developed.

-------
                              21



     5,   Resource recovery has become a viable alternative,



          particularly in solid waste as an energy source.




     6.   The hazardous arid toxic waste management problem




          has been identified and must be dealt with, by




          vigorous efforts at the Federal and State level.



     7.   It is now seen that more resource recovery will




          occur if vigorous enforcement eliminates the cheap




          and unacceptable options of old antiquated incinerators




          and open burning dumps.




     Finally, we've reached the conclusion that the management




of solid waste is actually a "residuals" management activity




which must deal with a variety of waste products which




require storage, transport, processing, reclamation, and



ultimately disposal on the land.








            1974 and the Prognosis for the Future








     Consequently, in late 1973, the Federal solid waste



management program focused its initiatives on those program



thrusts that utilize the above detailed "knowns," and which



;.-ili establish long-term directions for State and local




programs and a much broadar role for the Federal government



in "residuals" ir.anacemer.t.

-------
                         22



The Federal program during the next few years will bet



1.   Conducting further research, studies and analyses



     to provide State and Federal government with the



     tools necessary to regulate disposal operations to



     assure environmental protection.  State government



     will be pushed to intensify their standard and



     regulatory authority in solid waste management and



     will have to establish more vigorous enforcement



     programs to eliminate dumps.  If such State effort



     fails, the Federal government, no doubt, will have



     to establish some regulatory control over the



     land disposal of residuals.



2.   Supporting research to assess the environmental



     impacts of treatment and land disposal practices.



     Included in this work will be studies of leachate



     generation, characteristics and control techniques;



     gas generation, characteristics and control



     techniques; and the transmissibility of chemical



     constituents through the soil and aquatic media.



3.   Our experience has shown that the cost benefit



     ratio in technical assistance averages 1 to  10.



     Technical assistance efforts will therefore  be



     accelerated to assist local systems to improve



     th^ir •oroductivitv in collection operations  to

-------
                         23




     achieve optimum service at minimum costs.   Cost



     savings achieved in the collection productivity




     side of the ledger can  be transferred  over to the




     disposal operations where necessary to provide




     needed resources to upgrade unacceptable disposal




     sites.



4.   Leading the nation toward the utilization of




     solid waste as an energy source,  since we estimate



     that there is sufficient energy in. residential-



     solid waste to justify  this initiative.  With




     the continuing energy deficit that exists in the




     U.S., the market potential for energy  from solid




     waste is excellent and  our program will concentrate




     as much effort as possible in helping"  the nation




     realize that potential.



5.   Additionally, our Agency will work with. State




     solid waste agencies to establish State-supported.



     resource recovery systems.  This unique and. logical



     approach establishes the State level authority to



     construct and operate resource recovery systems.



     This approach takes advantage of several unique



     characteristics:




          a.   Economies of  scale




          b.   Larj'-i State funding authority to raise




               the m^ga dollars to build resource recovery




               facilities.

-------
                    24-                                  '



     c .   Broader authorities of State government.



We will initiate studies and analyses  to  determine



what if any national initiatives should be taken.



in source reduction.  This concept has received



some attention by EPA, but studies have not been.



extensive enough to judge if source reduction is a



viable alternative.



The final major thrust for the next several years



will establish the necessary elements  for: a national



program to properly control and manage those: wastes



that are inherently toxic; hazardous- because of. the



particular use and application or environmentally



degradating.  The results of the 1970-73  study



clearly indicates the need to place greater control



over such residuals.  Efforts shall be focused on



five areasi



     a.   Establishment of the health, and environmental



          effects of these residuals.



     b.   Determination of the "chain-of-evidence"



          necessary to establish standards for treatment



          and disposal.



     c.   Developing the necessary technology and



          dafining  the state-of-the-art for treatment



          and disposal.



     d.   Setting guidelines  for  treatment and



          disposal.

-------
                              2.5



               e.    Encouraging state  government  to  broaden



                    their solid >7aste  management  programs and




                    authorities to assure proper  control and




                    management of these residuals.




     These programs are very ambitious and will not  be fully




effective for some time.  However, the past  seven years have



built a foundation for a viable and effective national-




effort in solid waste management.



     These initiatives must be carried out while  legislative




decisions are also being made.  The current  Federal  legislation




expires at the end of June 1974.   Many hearings and  debates




have already been held, but it is unlikely that decisions on




the final nature of legislation will be made by the  end of




June 1974 and we expect a simple year  extension of the



existing act.  It seems safe to assume, however,  that the




programs presently underway will fit well into any new act



that will be passed.



     This lengthy review of our past savan years  and projection



of the next few years of the Federal solid waste  management



program clearly indicate that we have  moved  well  along the



path to achieving the original purposes of  the first Federal




GolicL Waste DisccsRl ~^ct.  The foundation has been  laid.




How well the foundation will support the structure we are



now building car. only be speculated upon. However,  we are




ootimistic; we ~hink we've clone our job up to now and we are




confidant chat tha future will justify our optimism..

-------
                                    REFER.-INCE3
 1.  Applied Management Sciences,  Inc.   Private sector in. solid waste
       nanagament; a profile of its  resources  and contribution, to  collection
       and disposal.  Washington,  U.S.  Government Printing Office.,  (In press.)

 2.  Autocomp Inc.  Solid waste laws in the U.S. Territories and States.
       Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office,  1972. 502 p.

 3.  Black, R. J., A. J. Munich, A.  J.  Klee, H. L. Hickman, Jr., and It. D.
       Vaughan.  The national solid  wastes survey; an interim  report,  [Gin—
       cinnati}>'-U.S.:-DepaJrt3umt--of: Haalfchf' Education, and Welfare^ [1968}..  53 p.

 4.  Bogue, H. D.  Clean and green solid waste system in Alabama is widely-
       copied.  Vast* Age, l(5):4-6, 10-11, 36, Sept.-Oct. 1970.   Reprinted,.
       Washington, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,. 1971. S  p..

 5.  Bmnner, D. R., and D. J. Seller.   Sanitary landfill design and operation.
       Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office,  1972. 59  p.

 6.  DeMarco, J., D. J. Keller, J. Leckman, and J. L. Newton.  Municipal-scale,
       incinerator design and operation.  Formerly titled "Incinerator- guidelines-
       1969."  Public Health Service Publication No. 2012.  Washington, U.S.
       Government Printing Office, 1973.  98 p.

 7.  First report to Congress on resource recovery.   [Washington], U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency, Feb. 22, 1973.  [90 p.]

 8.  Henningson, Durham, & Richardson,  Inc. Collection and disposal of solid
       waste for the Des Moines metropolitan area.   Washington, U.S. Government
       Printing Office, 1971.  [261  p.]

 9.  Report to Congress on hazardous waste disposal.  [Washington] ,, U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency, June 30, 1973.  16S p.

10.  Second report to Congress on resource recovery.  [Washington], U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency.  (In preparation.)

11.  The Solid Waste Disposal Act, Title 2 of  Public Law 89-272,  Oct. 20, 1965,
       as amended by the Resource Recovery Act of 1970, Public Law 91-512, Oct.
       26, 1970, and by Public Law 93-14, Apr. 9, 1973.  [Washington], U.S.
       Environmental Projection Agency, 1973.   14 p.

12,  Solid wasta management manpower profile and analysis.  Washington,
       L:.S. Environir.ar.tai Protection Agency, >Jan. 15, 1973.   [53  p.]

-------
13.  Solid waste reduction/salvage plant;  an interio. report; City of Madison
       p:..lot plant demonstration project,  June  14  to December 31, 1967.
       Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.  25 p.  Reprinted,
       Ciacinnati, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and. Welfare,  1969.

14.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Solid  waste management  demonstration
       grant projects—1971, for grants  awarded during the period June lr 1966-
       June 30, 1971.  Washington, U.S.  Government Printing. Office,. 1371.  247 p,

15.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Solid  waste management,  available .
       information materials.  Washington,  U.S. Government Printing Office,
       July 1973.  55 p.

16.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Proposed guidelines for thermal
       processing and land disposal of solid waste.  Federal Rsgi&t&p, part 2,.
       38(81):,544-10,553, Apr. 27, 1973.

-------
                  Map indicates where potential leachate infiltration is greatest.
                                    VIII

      Dumps:  A  Potential Threat to
        Our Ground water Supplies
Studies by EPA indicate potential groundwater
contamination from leachate formed when water
percolates through buried trash and garbage.
Each city needs to restudy its current and past
disposal practices because correcting any
damage could prove costly.
BRUCE WEDDLE and GEORGE GARLAND
Reprinted, with permission,      October 1974
            nation's  cities
            the magazine of the National League of Cities
• A 1972 OFFICE of Solid Waste
Management  Programs (OSWMP)
Survey1  estimated  that there were
about 14,000 dumps in operation na-
tionwide.
  New information emerging from a
damage assessment  study now under
way by OSWMP indicates that these
sites may pose a serious environ."1 cat-
al problem.2
  These findings, in the form of actual
damage cases, point out that some of
our groundwater resources are threat-
ened by  pollutants leaching  from
dumps.
  And if you think that occasional or
perhaps even a daily  soil  cover on
your landfill  means that you have a
sanitary landfill rather than a dump,
you may be mistaken.
  If sanitary landfill design criteria,

-------
        For Further Reading

   Q Listed below are several publi-
   cations  which will expand upon
   the information presented in this
   article. Sanitary landfill design and
   operating criteria are  presented
   as well as procedures for closing
   open dumps.
   Brunner, D. R., and  D. J. Keller.
      Sanitary landfill design and op-
      eration. Washington, U. S. Gov-
      ernment Printing  Office,  1972.
      59 p.
   Brunner, D.  R., S.   J. Hubbard,
      D. J.  Keller, and J. L. Newton.
      Closing open dumps. Environ-
      mental Protection  Publication
      SW-61ts.  Washington,  U.  S.
      Government  Printing   Office,
      1972.  19 p.
   Hughes, G. M., R. A.  Landon, and
      R. N. Farvolden. Hydrogeology
      of solid waste disposal sites in
      northeastern  Illinois; a final re-
      port on  a  solid waste  demon-
      stration grant project. Washing-
      ton, U.  S. Government  Print-
      ing Office, 1971.  154 p.
   Sorg, T.  J., and H.  L. Hickman,
      Jr. Sanitary landfill facts. 2nd
      ed. Public Health  Service Pub-
      lication No. 1972. Washington,
      U. S. Government Printing Of-
      fice, 1970. 30 p.
   U.  S.  Environmental  Protection
      Agency.   Thermal  processing
      and  land disposal of solid
      waste; guidelines.  Federal Reg-
      ister,  39(158):  29327-29338,
      Aug. 14, 1974.
      To obtain  a  free  copy  of any
   of the above publications, write
   Solid  Waste   Information  Ma-
   terials Control  Section, U.S.  En-
   vironmental  Protection  Agency,
   Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
      For further information write
   Chief,   Technology   Application
   Branch,  Office of  Solid  Waste
   Management   Program,    EPA,
   Washington,  D.C. 20460.
 including an  examination of the soil
 characteristics and hydrogeology of
 the  site  were not  considered  in its
 selection  and design, then even  daily
 cover and two to three  feet of final
 cover may not be sufficient to prevent
 groundwater degradation.
   With almost 50 per cent of the na-
 tion's population  using  groundwater
 for  domestic  use,  and with the total
 demand for groundwater growing,  it
| is of great  importance that  we begin
 taking steps today to protect this vital
 resource.

 'No One Ever Died
 From  Leachate'
   The environmental  impact of open
 dumping has  been oversimplified. The
 definition of sanitary landfilling adopt-
ed for statistical purposes by OSWMP
in the above mentioned 1972 survey,
and in other OSWMP surveys, includes
application of daily cover, no burning,
waste not placed directly into ground-
water, and  no visible pollution of
surface water.
   But the complex problem of leach-
ate (the  liquid produced  when water
passes through  solid waste and flushes
out  compounds and other  products
of  decomposition)  entering  unseen
into  the groundwater was ignored be-
cause of  the  difficulty in  obtaining
information.
   Indeed, the remark reportedly made
by one expert in the field that "no one
has  ever died  from  leachate"  was
widely accepted by many as a valid
perspective on  the leachate problem.
In fact, leachate was largely a labo-
ratory curiosity. The ability  of some
soils  to  attenuate  or  cleanse  pollut-
ants  in leachate may have given some
a  false sense  of  security about the
"good old dump."
   Although there  is no epidemiologic
evidence to suggest that anyone  ever
died  from  leachate, some cases of
damage  and potential  health  effects
are being found.

The Emerging Evidence
   "Groundwater  Contamination In
the Northeast States,"3 a recent report
published by EPA, summarizes infor-
mation  on 60  cases of damage  from
dumps  (Table   1). These  cases  were
obtained from interviews,  public agen-
cy files,  published  sources  and  un-
published  reports.  They  represent
readily  available  information  rather
than an exhaustive survey of all  sites.
   In one case, in Connecticut, a dump
caused the wells of about 50 subdivi-
sion  homes to  become  contaminated.
The   subdivision,   which  was   con-
structed  after  the dump was estab-
lished, will now have to be served by
an off-site community water supply at
a  capital cost   of $500,000  and an
additional annual cost of $55,000.
   Perhaps the  most serious  case be-
came known in Delaware in January
of 1972.  A homeowner  complained
that  her well water had an extremely
offensive taste and odor and contained
so much  iron  that her plumbing fix-
tures,  clothes,  and  dishes were  per-
manently stained.
   An investigation  by  the  Delaware
Geological Survey and the local coun-
ty public  works  department proved
that  a dump operated by the county
from 1960 to 1968 was the source of
contamination.  The site, located in an
abandoned sand and gravel  pit, had
been  an open  burning dump  during
part  of  its history, and  various in-
               Continued on page 24

-------
City Officials Address
EPA Leachate Position
  The following brief comments
are reactions by a mayor, a city
manager,  and  a sanitation  di-
rector to the EPA leachate story
on these pages.
A Mayor .  . .
  Apparently, EPA has chosen to
bite  the bullet on  solid  waste.
The  research supporting this ar-
ticle indicates  clearly that solid
waste management  is a national
problem  and deserves  more at-
tention than it's been getting.
  Actually,  the  article  under-
scores  recommendations   made
earlier this year by  the  NLC and
USCM Solid Waste Task Force.
  Calling for  increased  atten-
tion  to conventional areas of mu-
nicipal  waste  management, the
Solid Waste Task Force urged the
establishment   of   a   National
Center  for  Research  in  Waste
Management with  an  advisory
board composed  of local, state
and  private representatives. Re-
search activities should  address
a full range of disposal problems,
such as  leachate studies and test-
ing,  and extensive  work on im-
proved  methods  of sludge dis-
posal.
  The Task  Force   also  recom-
mended  an expanded  technical
assistance program  for  all major
aspects of solid  waste manage-
ment-collection, processing, dis-
posal,  materials and energy re-
covery.  In light of the increased
cost burden imposed upon local
governments  for  all  environ-
mental  control  programs, a fully
funded  program of technical as-
sistance represents  a  minimal
level of effort for the  federal
government.
   Finally, this  article is another
exhibit in the case for immediate
legislative action by the Congress,
with adequate  funding  for tech-
nical assistance, applied research
and  resource recovery demonstra-
tions.
John G. Hutchinson, Mayor
City of  Charleston,  W. Va.
Chairman,  NLC & USCM
Solid Waste Task Force
A Sanitation Director .  . .
   The   article   makes  several
 points which I think are  helpful.
 First,  that  overzealous  citizen
 groups  opposing sanitary landfills
 can thereby unwittingly perpetu-
 ate  the environmently insulting
dumps.
   Prior  approval of landfills  by
 appropriate state agencies is be-
 coming a well established pro-
 cedure  which  insures that full

          Continued on page  43
dustrial  wastes  had  been  accepted
along with municipal wastes.
  In  1970 the site was covered  with
2 to 5 feet of earth. Nevertheless,  an
underground plume  (flow) of leachate
had  enveloped her well and was ex-
tending  1,500 feet  toward  the  well
field of a water  company serving 80,-
000  people.
  The  company  had  to  reduce  its
pumping  rate and  interceptor wells
were  installed near the 60-acre dump.
The   leachate   migration  has   been
stopped  by pumping  the  interceptor
wells  and  a  number of  individual
wells  have  been  replaced. To com-
pletely  remedy  the  situation,  which
will take at least 10  years, the  county
will  probably have  to  spend  more
than $20 million.
  Of course,  the  problem does not
make itself so obvious as in the  Con-
necticut  and Delaware  cases.  The
U.S.  Geological Survey has been  in-
vestigating a number  of groundwater
pollution  incidents,  including  a  case
on  Long  Island,  N.Y.,  where  the
leachate  from a  dump  moved with the
groundwater flow  for  two miles. One
mile  from the site the selenium  con-
centration   in the  groundwater still
exceeded  drinking water standards.

How Does It Happen?
  The  production  of  leachate  is  a
complex process involving many vari-
ables  (Figure   1.    Simply  stated,
leachate  is formed when water perco-
lating through solid  waste flushes out
compounds  and  other products  of
decomposition.
  Rain  falling  over  a disposal  site
will partially infiltrate and partially run
off the surface. A portion of that water
which infiltrates will be used to  meet
the  demands for evapotranspiration
(soil  evaporation  and  plant transpira-
tion); the  remainder  will  percolate
down through the soil into the buried
solid waste.
  Initially, the  solid waste acts  as a
sponge and simply absorbs the water.
However, with the continued addition
of   rainwater  the  waste  eventually
reaches  the limit  of  its moisture  re-
taining capacity.  At  this point, any
further water entering the waste will
cause an  equal volume  of contami-
nated water  (leachate) to leave  the
waste.
   The process is greatly accelerated at
open  dumps  where soil cover is  not
 provided,  because  runoff is  greatly
reduced, thereby increasing infiltration
 and leachate  production.
   The water necessary  for  leachate
 production comes  not only from  preci-
 pitation but from  liquid waste disposal
 at  the  site,  moisture in  the  waste,
 water  running  onto  the site  from
adjacent properties, infiltration from
irrigation  above the site  (e.g., exces-
sive  watering of a golf  course built
over the site), and from surface  or
groundwater   moving  through   the
waste.
  The map in Figure 2  shows those
areas of the country where one would
expect net infiltration from precipita-
tion  into the  solid waste at a disposal
site.  This map shows  those  areas  of
the country  where potential  infiltra-
tion  (a measure of the annual amount
of water that percolates down through
the soil after runoff and evapotranspi-
ration  demands are met) is greatest.
  Although  runoff  is  important,  it
was  ignored  in  the  map  since  its
effects  vary with local conditions.
  As shown, infiltration  and the  re-
sulting leachate formation is potential-
ly greater  east  of  the  Mississippi
River  and in  the  Pacific Northwest
than in the rest of the country. Dumps
located in areas  of zero or negative
potenial infiltration may also produce
leachate,  especially if  they  are  in
direct  contact with ground or surface
water.
  Additionally,  if  rainfall  comes  at
one  time  of  the year,  some leachate
could  be  produced  even though  the
annual  potential infiltration  for that
area was zero.

How  Much  Leachate
Is Produced
  The  average dump  in  this  country
covers  17 acres.4 Thus theoretical cal-
culation assuming  10,000 of the esti-
mated  14,000 dumps being used  in
1972 received an average of 10 inches
of  infiltration annually, shows that
those  dumps  could  have  produced
over 46  billion  gallons  of leachate
during  that  year.  (We'll assume the
other 4,000  dumps are  in the "zero"
infiltration zone).
  What happened to this leachate and
how much reached the  groundwater
depended on the type and amount of
soil  under the site, the  operation of
the  site,  and  the  initial design  and
location of the site.
  Whether the leachate could cause a
problem depends on  the attenuation
ability  of the soil and presenl or pro-
posed  groundwater usage around  the
S'*C.

The Alternative
   Up  to  this point the detrimental
effects  of open dumping and improper
landfill practices  that  occur  in  most
communities today  have  been  dis-
cussed.  Now  let's  examine  sanitary
 landfilling which is the  only proven,
environmentally  acceptable method of
final disposal available.
   The term  "sanitary  landfill"   has

-------
                    PRECIPITATION
                                  EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
         FLOW
                                   LEACHATE PLUME
                                 Figure   1
                     The process of leachate formation.
been abused. A common definition—
a  disposal site  where solid  waste is
buried under six inches of daily earth
cover and two  to three feet  of  final
earth—is misleading.
   Sanitary  landfilling is  more  than
the cosmetic disposal of waste.  Dis-
posal sites,  no matter how well  run,
are  not  sanitary landfills unless de-
tailed subsurface criteria were met in
selecting the site.
   Specific  steps communities should
take are outlined in OSWMP's publi-
cation  Sanitary Landfill  Design  and
Operation and in  the other  publica-
tions listed (see box, page 22). These
publications   recommend  thorough
evaluation of  site characteristics  such
as:
•  depth from  the  bottom of the fill
to the  maximum  height of  ground-
water
•  direction  and flow rate of  ground-
water
•  present  and future  groundwater
demands
•  an analysis of underlying soils and
geology including  texture, permeabil-
ity, structure,  and  stratigraphy
•  topography (surface drainage)
•  net infiltration.
   State   solid  waste   management
agencies are another valuable source
of assistance  and   advice  during the
evaluation,  selection,  and design  of
sanitary  landfill sites.  Coordination
with these  agencies  should  be  con-
sidered  an  essential  first step in the
site selection process. Their participa-
tion  will facilitate  the selection of an
environmentally sound site and  mini-
mize the time necessary to meet per-
mit regulations.
The Irony of It All
  Sanitary landfills  are designed  to
control  leachate.  Careful attention is
paid  to  underlying  soil  and  hydro-
geological conditions, cover permeabil-
ity, and  types of solid  waste to  be
placed in the fill.
  Some states require collection and
treatment of  leachate where natural
conditions are unsuitable for land dis-
posal  without  special  precautions.
These  various  measures  make  the
chance  for  damage  from  sanitary
landfills extremely remote. Yet a few
citizens and environmental groups are
using the fact that zero discharge can-
not  be 100  per  cent assured as a
basis for defeating proposals for new
sanitary landfills.
  If it is really a sanitary landfill they
are  opposing, they  are unwittingly
 perpetuating  the environmentally in-
 sulting open dump.
   Further compounding site selection
 problems are those groups who  advo-
 cate that resource recovery techniques
 can replace the need for closing open
 dumps and establishing sanitary land-
 fills.  Although  resource  recovery is
 a worthy goal, and can result in great
 reduction of  the  volume  of  wastes
 requiring  disposal,  today  it cannot
 replace the need for environmentally
 sound land disposal.
   Moreover,  even the most complete
 and effective systems  of resource re-
 covery that can  be envisioned for the
 future will still leave  large residues
 of  unusable  wastes  which  must  be
 disposed of, on land, and in ways that
 do  not pollute.
   It  therefore  is  ironic  that  these
 groups, dedicated  as they are to pro-
 tecting our environment,  are actually
 contributing to the  degradation of the
 environment by  prolonging  the use of
 dumps.

 New Site Selection
   Application of the sanitary landfill
 criteria referred  to  above makes early
 attention and foresight in site selection
 even more critical.  In  too many cases
 the search ends with the selection of
 an  environmentally undesirable  site
 because the  old site just can't  accept
 any more waste.
   To ease this  crisis  decisionmaking
 atmosphere, communities should strive
 toward a goal of maintaining at least
 five years of disposal capacity on hand
 at all times.
   Sites with  good natural  soils and
 favorable hydrology  should be  set
 aside even at some political cost.  In
 the  long  run this  step wiH  provide
 the  multiple  benefits  of lower land
 acquisition costs,  improved planning
                Continued on page 42
                                 Table 1.
                SUMMARY OF DATA ON  42  MUNICIPAL
          AND 18  INDUSTRIAL DUMP CONTAMINATION CASES
     Findings
        Type of Dump
Municipal
     Assessment of principal damage
       Contamination of aquifer only        9
       Water supply well(s) affected        16
       Contamination of surface water     17

     Type of pollutant observed
       General contamination              37
       Toxic substances                   5
                           8
                           9
                           1
                           4
                          14
     Source: Ground water Contamination In The Northeast States, David M'iler, Frank DeLuca,
     Thomas Tessler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Develop-
     ment, June 1974.

-------
Dumps: A Potential Threat

Continued from page 25

and, most importantly, selection of an
environmentally sound disposal site.
  The need for sanitary landfill sites
must also be recognized in  land use
planning efforts. Such efforts often set
aside  land  for educational, recrea-
tional,   transportation,  commercial,
utility, and other uses. Similarly, land
use plans should identify acreage to be
used  for  solid  waste  disposal, an in-
dispensable community service.  Con-
scious planning for solid  waste dis-
posal will help prevent the  common
relegation of disposal to environment-
ally  unacceptable  (but more rapidly
available) sites.

What About Existing Sites?
  It is incumbent  upon each respon-
sible  local  official  to reexamine his
community's current and past disposal
practices. Failure to do so could result
in the loss of  the  groundwater as  a
resource  and may,  as  it  did in the
one  case  in Delaware, result  in  a
costly  cleanup program.  Indeed, the
community may be legally responsible
for any  damage caused by improper
disposal  at its site.
  A good  place to begin would be to
determine what hydrogeological infor-
mation,  if any, was  used during site
selection. Specifically,  were the  sani-
tary landfill  site  selection criteria fol-
lowed?
  In  those sites where these criteria
were   not  followed,  an  evaluation
should  be  made,  possibly  including
test wells, to identify  the subsurface
conditions  and to  monitor for the
presence and movement  of  leachate.
If leachate is discovered in the ground-
water, steps  should be taken immedi-
ately   to access  the  extent  of the
leachate  flow and the potential  threat
to users of that  groundwater. Then
an examination of alternative control
methods should be initiated  if neces-
sary.
  The  above  recommendations for
obtaining  new  sites  and monitoring
existing  sites are  easier to state than
to implement. They  will  increase di-
rect disposal costs.
  In the long run, however, it will be
to the  advantage of the community to
identify  and  prevent degradation of
our increasingly valuable groundwater
resources.  The  alternative  to  these
recommendations may carry a finan-
cial risk far greater than the cost of
prevention.                        •
11972  National Dump Site  Survey Report.
  Washington,  U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency, Office of Solid Waste Management
  Programs. March  1973.  (Unpublished  re-
  port.)
2 Garland, G. A., and  D. C. Moiher. Leachate
  Effects of Improper Land  Disposal. Wcutte
  Age. 6 (11),  November 1974. (In press.)
3 Miller,  D.  W., F.  A.  DeLuca, and T. L.
  Tessier, Groundwater contamination in  the
  Northeast States, Washington, U.S. Govern-
  ment Printing Office, June 197*.
ป Munich, A. J., A. J. Klee, and P. W. Britton.
  Preliminary  Data  Analysis: 1968 National
  Survey of Community Solid  Waste Practices.
  Public Health Service Publication No. 1867.
  Washington,  U.S. Government Printing  Of-
  fice, 1968. 483 p.
GEORGE A. GARLAND is Deputy Direc-
tor,  and BRUCE  R. WEDDLE is acting
chief Effects  and Analysis Branch in
the Systems Management Division of
the Environmental Protection Agency's
Solid Waste Management Program.
Leachate Reaction from Cil
Continued from page 24
consideration is given to environ-
mental, engineering, ecological
and other community concerns.
Economic considerations, which
have always had a vital bearing,
are now becoming increasingly
difficult. This, along with our
increasing knowledge of the ef-
fects of leachate traveling through
specific subsurface soil condi-
tions, could expedite a trend
toward providing customized
protection to each sanitary land-
fill on a more individualized
and enlightened basis.
John Teipel, P.E.
Director
Street and Sanitation Services
City of Dallas, Texas
A City Manager . . .
To ignore the possible effects
of leachate is as irresponsible as
to condemn a true sanitary land-
fill Property owners, environ-
\
ry Officials
mentalists, and city officials
should note the distinct differ-
ence drawn by this article and
prepare for the continuation of
land disposal of some solid waste
for many, many years into the
future.
Tom Osborne
City Manager
City of Greensboro, N.C.
It's working
Thanks bo you
^^•MTi* United Vtoy



For PERMANENT
REFERENCE FILES
nation's cities
Available on Microfilm
Starting with the initial issue, Spring,
1963, complete copies of NATION'S
CITIES, page by page, front cover to
back, are all available on microfilm.
This 35 mm. film fits all standard
viewers and saves 94 per cent storage
space. Write for information or send
orders direct to
UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC.
300 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, Mich. 48106
A Subsidiary of Xerox Corpontlon



-------
                        IX

                   HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGE: CEIIT
                      IN TEE UNITED STATES

                               By

                         Willian Sanjour
               Hazardous Waste Management Division
            Office of Solid Waste Kanagemer.t Programs
              U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                     Washington, D. C. 20460

                        For Presentation
                               At
            The Second Joint U.S. - Japan Conference
                    on Solid Waste Management
                        Washington, D.C.
                       Septenber 25, 1974
     Historically, solid waste has been perceived as  municipal

trash and garbage.  It vas thought that if ue could elisirutta the

rats,  flies  and open burning associated with open garbage dunpa

with sanitary landfill practices, the problem  would  be  solved.

Indeed,  the  term "sanitary" associated with landfill connotes a

hygenic condition which is rarely achieved and can be  misleading

to the public.



     More  recently,  municipal solid waste has been considered

as a possible source of materials  and  energy.   In  the  United

States,  the  amending  of  the  Solid  Waste Disposal Act by the
                                          i
Resource Recovery Act in 1S70, (PL 91-512)^ provided a new  thrust

for  the  solid  waste  nanaeenent  proaran  towards  recovery of

valuable  materials  cr.d  energy  frcm  waste  residuals.    Some

pragrass has been made in this area and much -ore is anticipated.

-------
     But  l_nd^arriil  wastes,  some  of  which  are  toxic  and




hazardous, have been largely ignored because traditionally  these




wastes  are  managed outside the municipal solid waste collection




and disposal system.  However, much of these wastes end up at the




sane disposal sits as municipal solid waste.








     Hazardous  waste  includes  toxic  chemicals,  pesticides,




acids,   caustics,   flammables,   explosives,   biological   and




radiological residuals.  In EPA's Report to the U.S. Congress  on.




Disposal  of  Hazardous  Waste  in  1973,   we estimated the total




amount of non-radioactive hazardous waste generated in the United




States to be approximately 10 million tons per year,  or  roughly




10  percent  of all industrial waste.  OSKMP studies now underway




indicate this number nay be much greater.








     According to cur studies, the primary source of  hazardous




wastes  is  the  industrial sector.  Examples of industry sources




include: chemicals, pesticides,  petrochemicals,  drugs,  primary




tsetals,  nonferrous  metals,  electroplating  and  batteries.  Of




course, this is a 3".ple list and thara are many other industries




which produce hazardous wastes.  But industry  is  not  the  only




source.    Installations   of   the  U.S.  government  and  ct'.ier

-------
                               3






institutions, such as hospitals and laboratories,  also  generate




hazardous wastes.








     Only  in  the  past  few  years have the public health and




environmental effects of improper solid  waste  disposal^, to  the




land  coiae  under  serious  study.  This problem is manifested in




groundvater   contamination   by    leachate,    surface    water




ccatanination  from  runoff,  air pollution, from, open burning and




evaporation, food contanination from improper  storage,  and,  of




course,.  personal injury fron direct contact and explosions' which  •




cay result fron the nixing of  wastes  in  unacceptable  landtiil




operations.  OST.^!P has on record a large number of- such incidents




from various sources as noted in the following examples.








     t  As a result of burying arsenic-containing pesticides in




Minnesota  in  the late 1930's,~eleven persons developed symptoms




of arsenic poisoning in 1972  after  drinking  contaainated  well




water.  Two of the victims required hospitalization and treatment.








     9   For  several  years,  a  large  rninicipal  landfill in




Lela-ire accapcid ;cch dc^catic ar.i ir.ductriil -rastzs.  In  1963,




this  disposal sirs was clcsed and forgotten about for four years




before chemical ar.d biological ieachates  were  detected  in  the

-------
nearby grouncwacer.  According to current estimates,   up   to   $26



million  ray  be  required  to  stop  further deterioration of  the



underground aquifer which serves as a drinking water   supply   to



over 40,000 area residents.







     t   From  1953  to  1973,  a  laboratory  company- in Iowa



utilized a dump site for  solid  waste  disposal.   Over   250,000



cubic  feet  of arsenic-bearing wastes have been deposited there.



Monitoring wells around the  dump have established   over  175   ppm



arsenic  in  the  groundwater.   The   U.S.  Public Health. Service



recomended drinking water standard for arsenic is 0.05 ppn.   The



dump site is located above  a  limestone  bedrock   aquifer, from



which  70  percent  of  the   nearby city's residents, obtain their



drinking  and  crop  irrigation  water.   Although there  is   no'



evidence  that  the  drinking  water   is  affected, the potential


                                • 2                            "
public health problem is obvious.






     •  20,000 head of cattle  were  quarantined   in   Louisiana



because  they  had  eaten grass contaminated by hexachlorobenzene


                                            2
(HCB) which had sublimed from a nearby ducp.   In  addition, children



have beer, poisoned by the improper use of  pesticide   containers,



workers  at  dumps have been injured  by explosions, and in short,



every year turns up new ways in which the disposal of  hazardous

-------
                            2
va3ta5  can  injure  people.    This  problem  can  appear  within a



relatively short tine', as happened, in Delaware, or  it  ran  take



decades  to  appear  as  was  demonstrated  in Ilinnesota.  It can



strike quickly in the form of acute poisoning, or  it  can.  cause-



slow  chronic  poisoning  over  a  lifetime  withour the victimsr



awareness.






     We see an increasing opportunity for adverse impacts  from



hazardous  waste disposal from at least three sources.  The first



is the expansion of industrial production in most  industrialized


countries,  which is tied directly to hazardous waste generation.



Next is the transfer of hazardous materials from other  media  to



the  land  as  a  result  of  air  and  water pollution controls.



Lastly, is the increase in hazardous waste materials destined  to



the  land  as  a  result  of  ocean  dumping controls and bans on


certain materials, such as the recent cancellation in the  United


States of most registrations for DDT pesticide.  Taking all these



sources  together, we estimate that the growth of hazardous waste


generation in the United States will be between 5 and 10  percent



per year.






     Or.--, could ask who causes this problem ~r.d how and vhy.  In



our  studies  to  date,  we  have established that the problem is

-------
caused costly by sc-a waste generators who use iaprcp^r  disposal




procedures  eithar  en-site,  that is, on their property, or off-




site through contract haulers, and that these iicproper  acts  ara




either  purposeful or accidental.  Also, we have found that waste




haulers sor&tices use Improper disposal cethods in. an  effort  to




reduce costs and irprcve their profit.  Lastly, those that are in.




the  business  of  treating  and  disposing  of  hazardous wastes




scnetiries use irrprcper techniques.








     Adverse irpacts to the public health and  the  en.vircnaa.nt




occur  because of open dunping and burning of hazardous wastes or




icproper use of existing land disposal sites.  These actions  can




be  either  overt or covert.  Also, improper use of holding ponds




on  industrial  land  and  improper  storage   techniques   cause




problens.








     We  believe  that the reason this situation exists is that




there are no widespread economic or  legislative  incentives  for




hazardous wasc= ;
     IP.  the  Ur.iced  Stales  we  have found that technology is




adecuate for the trsat-ir.c of cany hazardous wastes by  physical,




cr.e~ical,  the—al cr biological r.ear.s .  There are secure storage

-------
facilities available  for  those  few  wasces  to  which  current




treatment technology does not apply.








     The  nain  prohlea  is  that the use of this technology is




expensive and  far  exceeds  the  cost  of  current  unacceptable




practices.  For example, the incineration of hazardous wastes can.




run  as  high  as  S50 per ten, whereas tha current inappropriate




practices of open dunping or ocean.dunping costs approxinately $3




per ton.   So, we have a wide cost variation between hazardous waste




car.aget:e::t practicas which are acceptable versus those  that  are




generally used.








     These  cost  differentials  have  implications towards the




international balance of trade.  If one country were to insist on




proper hazardous waste treatment at higher costs, this  would  to




sone   degree  put  that  country's  industry  at  a  competitive




disadvantage with sinilar industries in countries which  did  not




have such high standards.








     As   we  ner.ticr.ed  before,  however,  the  canagenent  of




hazardous residues  is  er.erging  as  a  rr.ajor  problen  for  all




industrial  societies.   Several international organizations have




   csr.izcd this ".z are  beginning  to  develop  hazardous  waste

-------
                               8
canagenent  guidelines.    Drafc  procedures  for proper hazardous




waste disposal and storage were developed  by  a  recenc  working




group  cor.farer.ee  of  the "World Health Organization.  Hopefully,




through   such    international    cooperative    efforts*    all




industrialized   countries  can  achieve  common  guidelines  for




hazardous waste canagenent practices.








     Let ce new turn to the hazardous waste management programs




currently in being in the United States.   We  have  reached  the




conclusion  that  environriental  insult and hazards freer improper




waste  na~agenent  will  continue  in  the  absence   of   strong




regulation   of   land   disposal  and  vigorous  enforcement  of




regulations where they exist.  So long as  inertia,  indifference,




or  economic  pressures  still  tilt  the balance toward teproper




disposal; so long as no consistent and uniform  rules  exist  for




public  and  private  operation,  and  so long as offending sites




cannot  be  closed  because  no  alternatives  exist,  then   the




necessary   transition  from  poor  environmental  nanagement  to




cptisiun r.ar.age-ent will not take place.   For  this  reason,  and




because  talk  aicr.e  appears  insufficient to achieve acceptable




standards, ve believe that  government  regulation  of  hazardous




vaste ~ar.3?e~ent is essential.

-------
     Hazardous wastes cust be controlled frcra the .cradJLe to the



grava  in  crdar. to-achieve effective hazardous waste cansgenent.



It is not sufficient to regulate only the  land  disposal  phase,


since  cany  uncontrolled pathways to the environment would still



exist.               '                               .






     Unfortunately, the land disposal of  hazardous  wastes  is



essentially  unregulated at the Federal level and in. most. States.



Consequently, EPA has already reached  the  decision  to  seek  a



Federal  standard-setting  and  regulatory  role in the hazardous



waste area.  Early in  1973,  we  proposed  the  Hazardous  Waste


                3
Managsizent  Act.    If  passed it would provide far State regulation.


via  pernit  of  hazardous  waste   genc.r5.tiGH>   transporta-ticn,



storage,  treatnent, and disposal under Federal standards, and it



would  pernit  direct  Federal  regulation  of   some   extremely



hazardous  wastes  at the discretion of the Administrator of EPA.


This approach generally follows  the  precedent  of  the  Federal


Clean Air Act (PL 91-504).






     The  basic  elements oi ths Hazardous Waste Management Act



have been included ir. several otr.er pieces  or  proposed  Federal



legislation.   Frctz  the  various  pieces  of  legislation  under



ccr.sideration, it is hoped that scr.e fora of  regulatory  control

-------
                               10






of  hazardous  waste  management  at   the  Federal   level will be




provided.  The nature and character  of   that  responsibility  is




unknown at this tine.








     To  prepare for a standard-setting  role under  the proposed




Hazardous  Waste  Management  Act  or similar  legislation,   the




Federal progran thrust at this tine is aimed at three taaia. areas.








     First  we  are  vigorously  building  a  data   base in the




hazardous waste management area.   This   effort  has  tkrea  sub—




elements   including   public  health and  environmental  damage




assessment;  hazardous   waste   quaatifi-cation,   that   is,   a




fundamental  knowledge of what hazardous wastes are, how many* and




how much there are, and where they are;   and  lastly,  technology




assessment  attempting  to  define  all   possible  treatment  and




disposal technologies for  hazardous  wastes.   The  three  basic




technical    options   for   hazardous   waste   management   are




incineration, chemical treatment and special landfill.  We intend




to study all three of these options in some depth in  the  costing




years by demonstration grants and contracts.








     The  second  major  thrust  is in guidelines and standards




development.   Under  the  Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide   and

-------
                               11






Rodcnticide  Act, as amended in 1972,  (PL 92-515)  ye already have




the authority to issue procedures and  regulations  concerning  the




disposal   and   storage   of  excess   pesticides   and  pesticide




containers.  The first publication on  this subject,  which  is  a




statement  of EPA's recommended procedures- for pesticide disposal




and storage, appeared in the Federal Register on May 1ป. 1974.  At




this tide we are preparing regulations which  wilL  prohibit  the




worst  pesticide  disposal and storage acts such as open dumping,




open burning, etc.  Proposed rulemaking on this subject should be




published in late 1974.  Next, under Section  209   of  the  Solid




Waste  Disposal  Act,  as amended by the Resource  Recovery Act of




1970, va have the authority to issue guidelines for  solid  waste




management   practices.    We   axe developing hazardous  vraste




guidelines  similar  to  those  for land  disposal  and.' .thermal




processing  of  municipal  solid waste, which the  Office of Solid




Waste Management Programs published on August 14,  1974.  We  have




established  no  firm  date  for the publication of the hazardous




waste management guidelines since  they  are  somewhat  dependent




upon data base development activities.








     Our  third main thrust is in program ir.ple-antation.  Here




ve have three main sub-areas.  In the  policy analysis area we are




looking into what the Federal, State  and  prixrate  sector  roles

-------
                               12
should be in. hazardous vaste T^r.agensnt, and cthsr issues of this




typs.   ^Taxt,  in.  the State inpleceutation area,  working through




i?A's regional offices, we are attempting to aid and assist those




States that already have hazardous waste programs, to spur  those




that  don'tป  and in general to provide &s nxich. help to the. State




goverccents in this area as we possibly can.  Lastly, in, the area




of technical assistance we have a snail but-  cocpetent  technical




staff  capable  of  responding  to  requests  froa  alJ_  sources.




Currently, we have cany requests for assistance on  the  disposal




of  hazardous  wastes  fron  EPA  regional offices, other Federal




ageccies, State governments, private industry  and  from  private




individuals .








     At  the  State  and regional level in the United States we




are seeing an awakening towards the  hazardous  waste  nanagenent




issue.   Several of our larger industrialized States have already




passed State legislation which regulates hazardous waste disposal




ar.d storage.  The State of  California  has  already  implemented




such  a progran and the States of Illinois and New York are close




bsr.ir.d.  Also, ve have seen recently the t-argenca cf a  publicly




charrered  regional  authority  for  treacr.er.c  and  disposal  of




hazardous vastes at the Gulf Const v'aste  Disposal  Authority  in




the Houston area.

-------
                               13






     Ir.  the  last two years or so there has been a significant




change in tha rola of the private sector in  the  United  States.




Ve   have  seen  the  emergence  of  large  corporate  industries




operating  over  extended  geographies  caking  use   of   cocern.




nanagecent techniques and taking advantage of. economies of scale.




Scne  private  waste  contractors  have diversified to assune new-




functions in recovery and hazardous waste processing^  Also, soce




large fir^s have invested in their own hazardous waste canagenent




facilities.   Examples  are  Dow  Cheaical  Cocpany  in  Kidland,




Michigan,  3-M  Corporation  in  St.  Paul, and the Eastrail Kodak




Corporation in Rochester, New York.








     Heifers I clcss I vcuId like to Leave you vith scca cf  our




philosophy   concerning  hazardous  waste  nanagenent.   Ke  have




attempted to establish a reasonable scenario for hazardous  waste




flew  after  generation.   Cur philosophy, .as the land protection




group within EPA, is to ninioize hazardous waste disposal to  the




land.   However,  in the long run, we -don't believe that improved




disposal technology is the real answer.  Every industrial  nation




is  fir.dir.-  it  harder  to  set  raw  materials.   Even Ar.erican




^r.>_,__3iry, ~..^cr. ^a.ฃ -,^s3-c i^r so Icr.g wit.-, a  cneap,  sier.i.n.gly




infinite  supply  of  co-astic raw r.?.teric.i, is nov irpcrting and




carafullv husbanding -uch of its sutsalies  as  Japanese  industrv

-------
                               14






lsarr.ed  to  dc  a  long  tire  ago.   Industrial  wastes  can he




eliru.zatad by process inprove—2T.ts,  or they can be  recycled,  or




used  as  feed stock for other industries.  The ultinate solution




to the problen of hazardous wastes is not to have  any.   And  we




see  the  development  and  enforcement  of safe, en.vlroinaental.-Iy




clean disposal techniques as a  ceans  by  which  the  govemnen.t




fosters this end, rather than an end in itself.








     Our  nain  strategy will be to concentrate hazardous waste




at the source rather than to dilute thea  into  the  environment.




Hazardous  waste  concentration  ndninizes handling and. transport




problems, cakes resource recovery frets these wastes  economically




more  attractive,  and  allows  better  management central.  Such




concentration will occur naturally as  air  and  water  pollution




control  systens  extract  noxious  pollutants  from  waste  flow




strea-s.  Also, product bans, such as DDT, will result in  large,




concentrated stocks of excess naterials.








     We  support  the  concept  of  a  hazardous waste clearing




house, that is, to use the waste as is, if possible.   One  nan's




waste   is  anodic r  tali's  iced  stc-1:.   A  fir-  in  Berkeley,




California, vss recently fsr~ed to provide this service  for   the

-------
                               15



western  area.   The  clearina  house  concept  has  been adopted
                                                  A JF
recently ir. Scir.danavia and Wซst Gereany, as well. '




     Many hazardous wastes contain  valuable  basic  caterials,


soi-e of which are in short supply.  Material recovery cakes sense


frca both resource conservation and environmental points of view.

Extraction   of   materials  from  concentrated  waste  generally


requires less energy,  and  generates'  far  less  air ~ and  water


pollution,  than the nining and processing operations required to


produce  the  naterial  fron  virgin  resources.    As   material

shortages   beco-e   nore   widespread,  catsrial  recovery  froa.


hazardous waste will beco~e nore econcnically  attractive.   Even


so,  we  Idcw  of  cne eastern fire that actually buys industrial

waste for material recovery right now.




     If hazardous waste cannot be used or  materials  recovered

fro-  it, ar.d if it can be safely burned, we would next recocnend

destruction by incineration  with  energy  recovery  during  this


operation,   if   possible.    Incineration  of  hazardous  waste

generally  requires  special,  high-tenperature  equipr-.ent   with


                    ~"~"  ~
       ci.cr.3 s.r.ci vssce t^irocessin-* ^ i.r~j5 rii

-------
                               16
                                TICt CCZtTT-CTlly available
the nation as yet.








     Non-burnable wastes should be detoxified  and  neutralized




by  chemical or biological treatment, where possible, to miciaize




Che azounts of toxic materials destined for land disposal..
rsnable   to   recovery   or
     For 'hazardous  wastes  not




destruction,  we  reccr^aend volune reduction to nininize land use




requirements ,  • followed .by   isolation   techniques,   such   as




encapsulation,  prior  to  land  burial  in  specially designated




landfills which in turn nay be isolated frc- croundvater supplies




by  natural  22c--3--   f creations   cr   artificial   ~ac.brc.nes.




!fcnitcring   and  surveillance  syste— s  are  required  for  such




landfills to detect any leachate and prevent unauthorized entry.
     Let ca surrzarize our perceptions of  the  hazardous  waste




sianaganent  situation  in the United States at this tine.  First,




ve now know that ve have a problera,  a  zajor  problem  which  is
             .11
                                                         roen is

-------
                               17
costly,  apprc::imacsly  10  to  40  times as expensive as current


unacceptable practices, which consist mainly  of  iandfilling  or

                3
ocean  disposal.   Consequently, there are no incentives for the use


of  this  technology  and,  furtheraore,  there  are  no   strong


regulatory incentives at either the Federal or aast State levels.
     Consequently,  a regulatory strategy for the r;a-ฃgenent of


hazardous wastes is under development.  This program, will require


a joint Federal, State, and private sector response.   We  see  a


lengthy  period  during  which  legislaticn  and  regulations are


developed and facilities are made available,  but  eventually  ve


vould  fcrcsea  a regulatory program with adequate enforcement to


prevent the potential public  health  and  environmental  damages


which can occur frca irnprcper management of these wastes.






     The   United   States   is  working  together  with  other


industrialized  nations  to   develop   common   guidelines   for


acceptable  hazardous  waste management practices.  This is a new


and growing field but we have confidence that the hazardous x^aste


r.ar.3j=.- = -1 program of ail incusnrialiced countries vill  reach  a


                                   and  er.vlrcr--2r.ral  effects of

-------
                               13
                           References
1.   Feir.siass, E. J., The ?:sw Er.alar.d Journal of Medicine,
       283(16), 323-330.

2.   QSซiy files

3.   EPA, Report to Congress - Disposal of Hazardous Wastes,
       June 30, 1973.

4.   Var Industri, August 1973, 39-^0 (in Swedish).

5.   Uswelt, January 1974, 22-23 (in German).

-------
                 RESOURCE RECOVERY IN THE UNITED STATES
                             Nicholas Hur.ber
                      Director of Resource Recovery
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Presented September 25, 1974 to Japanese - United States Conference
on Solid V?ste Management, Washington, B.C.

-------
Introduction




     It is a great pleasure to be here this morning to share a few




thoughts with you about resource recovery.  In the past year, we




have witnessed significant strides in the solution to the nation's




solid waste problems, particularly in resource recovery.  Ironically,




the great strides of the past year were the result of the existence




of a new problem, the energy and materials shortages.  In other words,




the energy crisis advanced resource recovery substantially because




cities and states saw municipal waste as a new source of energy,




ferrous metals, non-ferrous metals, and glass.




     Since Earth Day 1970, man has questioned his previously uncontrolled




growth—in technology, industrialization, urbanization, consumption of




resources and population—questions for which he had no immediate




answers.  One of the problems caused by unchecked growth was environ-




mental pollution.




     Resource recovery was seen as a solution to  two of the  above




problems, environmental pollution and consumption of resources.  For the




next three years, much groundwork was laid, but little progress  at the




municipal level was  seen.  The Energy Crisis of 1973 legitimized




resource recovery because many people realized that municipal  solid




waste  is a  legitimate  source  of raw materials and energy.




Energy and  Materials Content  in Solid Waste




     Energy Savings  - The potential energy  savings  is  derived  in two




ways:   (a)  direct conversion  of the combustible portion  to  energy  (energy




recovery)  and (b) energy  savings  derived from consuming  recycled




materials  in production  processes  (materials  recovery)  such as glass




and metals.

-------
     Direct conversion of waste to energy can pi.^.o  significant




energy.  More precisely, if resource recovery systc-n-.o nad been operating




in the ".ore densely populated areas, such as the Standard Metropolitan




Statistical Areas  (SMSA's) in 1971, ov-_,r 830 trillion BTU's would




have been recovered.  This is equivalent to 390,000 barrels per day of




oil.  This should  grow to 510,000 barrels per day by 1980.




     The energy savings derived from consuming recycled materials in




production processes is also noteworthy.  We have identified these




savings by comparing two production processes—one using virgin materials




and the other using recycled (secondary) materials.  We have made these




comparisons for steel, aluminum, glass, and other production processes.




The production processes consuming recycled materials usually  consume




less energy than systems consuming virgin materials—when all  stages




of materials, acquisition, processing, and transportation are  included.




     The energy savings from using  recycled rather than virgin materials




in the production  processes for aluminum, ferrous, and glass are:




     Material                       Energy Savings Over Virgin




                                          Material Process




     Aluminum                                87  - 97 %




     Ferrous                                 50  - 60 %




     Glass                                     5  - IS %




     If these materials had been extracted from  municipal  solid  waste




in 1972 in  the  SMSA's,  almost.  14 million  tons:  of steel, aluminum, and




glass  would have been  recovered and substituted  for  their  virgin




material counterparts.




     Such a substitution,  based or.  preliminary estimates,  would  aavre




yielded a national energy  bavi-jv of the equivalent of 80,000 barrels of

-------
                                    3




oil per day.  This has been estimated to rise to approx^it.jely 1.20,000




barrels per day in 1980.




     Thus, the total energy savings from resource recovery is:




                                    Energy Savings*




                                    1971               1980




     Energy Recovery                390,000            510,000




     Materials Recovery              80,000            120,000




               Total                470,000            ^30,000




     ^Barrels of oil per day equivalent




The Compatibility of Energy Recovery, Materials Recovery, and Source  Separation




     Since  the energy crisis began, many have used the term energy recovery




to mean resource recovery.  I feel it is important to use the proper




term,  resource recc/ery, becausa  soet people feel that when EPA promotes




the concept of energy recovery, we are  against materials recovery




and source  separation of newsprint.  Nothing could be farther from the




truth.  We  are encouraging local  governments to evaluate all  three con-




cepts  because they  are  all compatible with each other.  Energy recovery




techniques  can be employed to reuse  much of the waste that  cannot be




reclaimed by materials  recovery or source  separation.




     Another way  of looking at  it is that  most  energy recovery technological




approaches  separate the combustibles from  the non combustibles to upgrade




the  quality of  the  fuel.   The non-combustible portion is composed




primarily of metals and glass.  And  it  is  often  cheaper  to  recover  the




metals and  glass  rather than  laadfilling  them!   Consequently, all  three




approaches  should be considered.

-------
                                    4




Power Utilities - Interest in Energy Recovery



     As I have indicated, the potential energy M - !  c.c- •> oe converted




from municipal solid waste (roughly the equivalent of 400 thousand




barrels of oil per day) is not an overwhelming amount of energy.




Yet, 400 thousand barrels of ail is significant: when expressed  as :




     a.  5 1/2 percent of fuel consumed by all utilities in 1970




     b.  6.7 percent of all fossil fuel consumed by utilities in 1970




     c.  11 percent of all the coal consumed by utilities in 1970




     d.  27 percent of oil projected to be delivered through the




         Alaskan Pipeline




     e,  40 percent of the c;,i.,ie oil imported from the Middle East




         in September, 1973




     f.  1 percent of all energy consumed in  the U.S.  in 1970  (32.5




         million B/DOE)




     The four hundred thousand barrels of oil is not insignificant when




put  in  the perspective as being equivalent to 11 percent of coal con-




sumed by utilities in 1970.  A recent Gordian Associates study  "Where




the  Boilers Are" commissioned by EPA, examined this  issue in greater



detail.  The study surveyed electric utility  boilers,  on a boiler-b>—




boiler  basis, with potential capacity for burning solid waste  as a




fuel.   It covered the major coal-burning states and  urban centers which




account for over 90 percent of the  coal consumption  for power  generation.




The  information given  for  investor-owned and  municipally-owned plants  ircludes




the  following:




     a)  Boiler characteristics




     b)  Energy requirements  for r; •-,.trinity  generation




     c)  Potential energy  ay*}1 alii l^./  irom solid waste  from  surrounding




         area

-------
     d)   Typical transportation <-  ^stances from centers oi  waste




         generation to the plants.




     The results of the study provide several important insights.




Although the potential energy supply from refuse is 6.7 percent of




fossil fuel consumed by all utilities aationally, it is substantially




higher in some regions:




                                    Potential Utility Energy




     Region                         Supply From Refuse




                                    (fossil fuel plants)




     Massachusetts                  13%




     Maryland                        8%




     Minneapolis                    10%




     New Jersey                      9%




     New York                       14%




     Rhode  Island                   43%




     Examination of only  coal  burning plants  producers  results  that




 are  even more  dramatic:



                                    Potential Utility Energy




      Region                         Supply From Refuse




                                     (Coal-burning Plants)




      Florida                        24%




      Illinois                         8%




      Massachusetts                  19%




      Minneapolis                    10%




      New Jersey                     10%




      New York                       19%

-------
                                    6




Future Plans of Union Electric



     Union Electric, the electric utility :,^3. -ij-: in tue St. Louis



"refuse to energy" demonstration has recently announced plans to build,



own, and operate a $70 million transfer station and resource recovery



system to serve the entire St. Louis metropolitan area.  It wil? be



capable of handling 8,000 tons of waste per day.  This commit tirent



surely indicates Union Electric's confidence In the concept.



     At the same time, Combustion Engineering announced plans to build



12 pre-engineered utility refuse-firing modules,  They could be used



for coal-fired and oil-fired  systems.  The modules would be capable of




firing up to 20% solid waste  on an energy input basis.




Connecticut



     The Connecticut ?,asource Recovery Authority recently announced plans




to build two resource recover; systems that will process 3600 tons per



day of waste.  The plants are projected to recover 80,000  tons per



year of ferrous scrap, 4,000  tons per year of aluminum, 40,000 tort



per year of glass, and a fuel that will be sold to utilities.  The



fuel will represent 10%  of  the utility fuel required  by each region.



The fuel of the Bridgeport  processing plant will be sold to Northeast



Utilities' Devon plant as a supplementary fuel.  The  Hew Britain  plant



will produce a fuel product that will be sold  to Wal.lingford's Pierce



power  station as its primary fuel.



     Net disposal  cost for  the communitiea perticipating in  these systems



will be a maximum  of  $10 to $12 per  ton, iueimdiug operation of the



transfer stations.  RefvMda from  the sale of products could  reduce the  dump




fee by $3 to $5 per ton.

-------
                                    7




     The total guaranteed maxltuuT-  costs, which include transfer




station costs, will be about $4 per ton more.  Kowver,  this should




be reduced by shared revenues of $3 to $5 per ion.  !'<> summarize:




                                          Expected            Expected




Guaranteed Maximum Cost                   Additional Revenue  Net Cost




Transfer     Processing 6.     Total




Station      Recovery




  $4          $5 to $8       $9 to $12         $3 to $5       $4 to  $9




Note that the processing and recovery costs  of $5 to $8 per ton include




some revenue from  the sale of recovered materials.  However, because it




is a guaranteed maximum net cost, fairly conservative prices for energy




and materials are  utilized.  The expected additional revenue of  $3  to $5




per ton  reflects existing prices  (higher than base  prices)  for  the




recovered products.




     Future  adjustments will be made  to  these charges because of in-




flation. The future  charges will be  determined  by  formula negotiated




at  the beginning of  the  contracts.  The formula  includes  costs  that can




be  affected  by inflation such  as  labor costs and equipment costs.   Ad-




justments will be  determined by wage  and other  cost indices.   Some costs,




such  as utilities  and taxes, are  not  included in the formula because




they  cannot  be controlled by the  operator of the plant.   These costs




will  be adjusted  as they occur.




      The disposal cost of the  Hempstead, Long Island system has been




projected to be in the $9 to $12  per ton range.   The Sangus, Massachusetts




 facility's disposal cost will probably be in the $11 to $14 per ton




 range.

-------
Other Utilities




     The interest of other utilities in shiti.1 -_;ujฃ- >>as baen sub-




stantial.  Two utilities, in Chicago, Illinois and Amos,  Iowa have commuted




to burning waste in their power plants.  The solid waste  processing




facilities are now being built in these cities.  We are aware nf




over 30 other utilities studying the concept's feasibility.




     Utilities are interested also in other waste to energy systems.




San Diego Gas and Electric has committed to purchase the  oil-like




liquid that will be produced by an EPA demonstration in San Diego




County.  SDG&E made the committraent after receiving satisfactory com-




bustion test results of aซ.vt.ples made from the pilot process.




     A resource recovery facility to be built in Hempstead, Long




Island will utilize solid waste as the primary fuel to produce electricity




that will be sold to the local utility.  Another EPA demonstration in




Baltimore will use a pyrolytic process to produce steaia that will be




sold to Baltimore Gas and Elecuiic which produces electricity,




heating- and cooling to downtown buildings.  In Nashville,  Tennessee,




the Nashville Thermal Corporation, a quasi-public corporation, will




produce chilled water and steam for over 40 customers, including hotels,




commercial office buildings and government buildings.  A  waterwail in-




cinerator will be used to convert solid waste to chilled  water or steam.



Future Concepts




     Newer concepts that are being evaluated include gas  pyrolysis and




methane production.  Several companies ai-? developing  gas pyrolysis




systems.  Union Carbide  is  .instructing a 200 ton per  day facility in




South Charlestown, West  VirgiT•';-.  The process will  utilize pure

-------
oxygen rather than air.  The reBU*cant gas is & clean burning




fuel comparable to natural gas in ccabustion char:^'or-, sties, but




with a heating value of about 300 BTU's per cubic foot (natural gas




is about 1000 BTU's per cubic foot).  It is essentially free of




sulphur compounds and nitrogen oxides.  This gas can be substituted




for natural gas at an existing facility.



     Monsanto and Carborundum have also developed gas pyrolysis systems.




Both approaches utilize air instead of pure oxygen as a source of




oxygen.  The heating value, 100 BTU's per cubic foot, is lower because




of the dilution by the nitrogen in the air.




     Methane and carbon dioxide can also be produced by decomposing




solid waste in an anerobic  (oxygen-free) environment.  Programs are




currently underway to  recover methane produced both by the natural




solid waste decomposition in a landfill and also from accelerated de-




composition in a mechanical digester, similar  to that employed in




digesting sewage sludge.




      In  the sanitary landfill recovery  program a well  is drilled through



 the  landfill  and lined with perforated  pipe.   The  gases are  pumped  out




 and  then cleaned of  the  carbon dioxide  using membrane  filtration




 or  cyrogenic  separation  techniques.   The  NRG NuFuel  Company  is currently




 installing  gas  recovery  systems  in landfills operated, by  the County




 of  Los  Angeles  and  the city of Phoenix.   Both  of  these sites possess




 very specific characteristics  which are necessary if the  concept  is to




 be  feasible.




      The National  Science Foundation is currently supporting a research




 effort  by  the Dynatech Corporation to examine  the feasibility of  com-

-------
                                   10




bining solid waste with st^'at-,- iludge for digestion in a mechanical




digester.  Pipeline quality gas would be recovt'.reu at the rate




of 3,700 cubic feet of 900 3TU gas per ton of soo.id waste.




Lessons From St. Louis




     The St. Louis demonstration ha,  proved that the fundamental




principle of operation, burning shredded solid waste in a tanger^rially




fired utility boiler, is feasible.  This is substantiated by both  the




committment of Union Electric to build a $70 million system and alt-."




by the Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority's decision to construct




two shredded fuel plants.  Several companies are offering to design,




construct and operate similar systems.




     The demonstration project in St. Louis is a research and  development




project.  The system has not been optimized for continuous operation.




In the next 12 months, EPA will spend approximately  $1 million for




process  optimization and air pollution testing.  The issues  that will




be examined by  the process evaluation include:




     Particle size - The nominal particle  size of  the  shredded




     refuse is now 1.5 inches.  Union Electric is  tentatively




     planning to process  to a. smaller specification* 1.0  inch




       Other system concepts call for a  larger particle  size.




     Obviously,  there  is  little agreement  on  this  issue.  Particle




     size  can effect  combustion efficiency, air emissions,  re-




     liability  of processing, and processing  costs.




     Redundancy - The  processing  system  if-- ose long  chain of com-




     ponents.   We've  learned  through  experience  that just about




     every link in  the chain  can  fail at one  time  or another.

-------
                               11




Further process evaluation can reduce tlu. fa:'lure rate.




Nonetheless, it appears that some redundancy \ j.i 1 be




necessary.




Handling and Preparation - Several problems have been




encountered in the development phase of the project.




Shredded waste has proved to be a difficult material




to move in a pneumatic transport system.  Solid waste




is abrasive, bridges in storage bins, and stalls in




the piping.  None of these problems appear to be in-




surmountable.  However, additional engineering work




is needed.




Location  of Classifier - This  issue focuses primarily




on whether  the classifier should be placed between the




shredders (assuming two shredders) or after both.




Type  of Classifier - Hie St. Louis system utilizes an




air classifier to separate  ths light fraction from




the heavy fraction.  Shredded  waste is  injected  into




a  rising  current of air.  Several other air  classifier




concepts  exist.  Non-air classifiers, such as screens,




are being  proposed by some firms.  The question of  the




necessity of  one or  two  classifiers  in  series is also




part  of  this  issue.




Fire  Control  - The  two fires at the  St. Louis processing




plant occurred during construction phases.   Neither was




associated with operate... al problems.   Nevertheless,  the




combustible nature  of solid vas-.ie must  be kept  in mind




in designing a processing p

-------
                                  12




     Utility  Operation - Union Electric's  expeT <>.~^.:^  with  burning




     solid  waste  has  been quite good.   No  Increase  in corrosion




     or  erosion of  the boiler tubes  has been observed.   The bottom




     ash handling is  more difficult,  ^hen solid waste  is burned.  It




     is  necessary to  flush the ash handling pit more  often.  ThJ.cป




     increase might be reduced by shredding the waste to a smaller




     nominal  particle size.  A lower firing rate might be another




     solution.




     Height of Boiler Firing Ports - The height of the ports is




     another  issue to be ex&eiined by further evaluation.  The trade




     off between  (a)  better burnout  and (b) increased air pollution




     (ash more likely to go out of stacks) from higher port place-




     ment is  the  major issue.




     The second element of future EPA work will be further evaluation




of the air emissions, the primary purpose being identification of




techniques that can reduce particle  emissions.  These variables




include particle  size, location of boiler firing ports, boiler load,




percentage of solid waste in the fuel mix, moisture content, the coal




firing rate,  and  the operating conditions of the electrostatic pre-




cipitators (air pollution control device).




     A preliminary analysis of the data from th
-------
                                   13






emissions when firing solid waste with coal.  "'l-if- apparent discrepancy




may be the result of differences In the experimental conditions or




experiment techniques employed duting the respective tests.  EPA  is




presently trying to correlate these emissions data with the test




variables to explain the differences in measured emission values.




     Analysis of data on the gaseous emissions, which were measured




only on the EPA test, indicate that the sulfur oxide (SOx) emissions  f.re




not appreciably changed by the firing of solid waste with coal, and




that there are no significant changes in the emission levels of the




following:




                         Hydrocarbons (HC)




                         Carbon Monoxide (CO)




                         Mercury Vapor  (Hgv)




                         Chlorine  (Cland HCT)




     The air test evaluations are  scnaduled for the  fall.  It  appears




that the additional particulate emissions caused by  burning waste will




result in increased particulate emission control costs.  The magnitude




of  the increase cannot be ascertained until the magnitude of the




particulate  level can be pinpointed.




     In conclusion, although  there are  several  issues  that we  will study




more comprehensively, the basic concept of burning waste in a  utility




boiler has proved to be feasible.   The major question  in proving  feasi-




bility is the  boiler corrosion and erosion  issue.  As  stated previously,




no  boiler corrosion and etos-fr>n has been observed in the Union Electric




facility.  It  appears that  the other  issues can be solved by further

-------
                                   14
engineering.  This is substantiated by the commitment of many




large companies to build second generation systems.




Status of Resource Recovery Implementations




     We have recently inventoried the status of resource recovery




implementations.  The results are summarized in the  following  table.




         Status of Recovery System Implementation*




                              May, 1974




Systems in                      Systems                    CoEimuiiities




Operation                      Selected                    Committed




    5                             11                         17




     The cities in each  category are  identified in Table I on  the




next page.  The St. Louis, Missouri  (600  ton per  day) and  Brockton,




Massachusetts  (600 ton per day) systems produce a shredded fuel  produc.




The Nashville, Tennessee (700 ton per day) system produces steam




and chilled water.  The  Franklin, Ohio system  is  a materials recov:ry




system.  No energy is recovered in Franklin although the pilot opera-




tion has led to the development of a  second generation  system  that




includes energy recovery.  Browning-Ferris Industries operates a




500  ton per day materials  recovery facility  in Houston, Texas.











*Definitions:
 Systems  in Operation;   Actual recovery from waste ซ




 Systems  Selected:   Winmr of RFP or construction contract announced.




 Communities Committed:   RFP issued, 0ฃ design study underway, 2J_ con-




 struction funding has  b ?er< !?ซ-.-"<ป available,  or community passed resolution.

-------
                    •H
                        W
                                       M         U  C
                                         .   .       .  g
                                       aJ jd   • Q  o
                                    o      u  o     o
                                                                   /s   c
                                                                    o   d
                                                                                            P3   =•   ซ•  i
                                                                                         -• >  03  M  G
                                                                                         X     -O  -H  3
                                                                       •a  4J
                                                                                                 c

                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                CJ
                                                             co
rH

 CU
rH

•5
H
            06
            u

            o
            O
PM
O
CO

I
CO
er>
                    4J
                    •H
                                             CO
                                 cu
                                a
                                                 C  M
                                                 O
        C  >
        3  4-1
        O  C
                 3
             O   O
Li*   co    •  -H  i-J
    •H   C  J3
  -SCO    •
 ix      CU       CO
      • H    *  C
     cU      "O   R3
                                                                         -   C
                                                                        cu   C
                                                                                                                 C   •
                                                                                                                 ง ^
                                                                                                                U 21
-    -U   3   CU       „   -
60  O       O  ^!   CO   (0  rH
COOCUOS-HrHlM
•H   CO   O       Ct}  J"J   1)  O
S   o   n   co   3   cu  >
rH-HCTjrHgCU&
•HJOM-HCUrHCU
SBCJSQSeSUiS
                                                                 R)      4J
                                                                s    - c
                     C   O
                     O  SH
                     4J
                     CO   S
                     O   CU
                    Pd  a
 co   -

rH  CJ
 O  CO
 O.  CO
 CO  C
 cu  cu

 c  o
CU  G
    o
                                                                                                                     G
                                                                                                                     t-l
                                                                                                                     cu
 C  rH
 cu   ta
H  >

  -  O
 CU  v-t
     C
     O

     ce
 x   co
 O   3
            H
            W
            Q
                                          •  "3
                                        *w >
                                     co  O
                                     CO
                                                              •  C  C
                                                             CO  C  0
                                                             CO  O  U
                                                                                  co
                                                                                  MO
                                                                  ซ C
                                                  CU
                                                 4-1
                                                  CO
                                                  >,
                                                 co
                                         00 4-1  O
                                      ซ cu  co  M
                                     H  -H  0)
                                         Q
                                     cu
                                                 co
                                                                                     O  0)  O  4->  03
                                                                                   -     MO.-HOI
                                                                                  0)    • 4->  CU  M  4J
                                                                                             OOPQ  CO
                                                         o  -H  13
                                                                         ex,
                                   •   o   co   c  2
                                 .Q  -H   CO   CU  ซ
                                 Sg   ซH|


                                  to    ~   •  cu
                                 •H   fi   -    •   "
                                  3  -rl
                                  O  rH
                                     'C  O J3
                                      CO  O  CO
                                 CO PK PP
                                              w S
                                              re 5

-------
                                    15




     Several states have developed programs i .- rrซjvide financing for




resource recovery, either through grants or loan?.  Foremost of these




is Connecticut's Resource Recovery Authority that has $250 in funds




authorized.  The authority will be repaid on a break-even basis through




disposal fees.  New York. State has set aside $175 million of a $1.1




billion environmental bond for solid waste disposal facilities.  The




program will provide up to 50% of the capital costs.  Other states




with funding programs include Maryland, Rhode Island, Wisconsin,




Washington, Minnesota, Illinois, and Tennessee.




Conclusions




     As I have indicatedป there is a tremendous amount of resource  recovery




activity in this country.  In the pust "aar, many cities and states have




developed programs.  Most are proceeding at a reasonable rate, addressing




all the marketing, legal, financing, management, and  technical issues




through proper initial planning before issuing an RFP.  However, some  are




not.   Instead, they are rushing headlong into implementation without




adequate planning.




      This  can be  a dangerous oversight.  Resource recovery  has more in




common with a for-profit  business  than a municipal  service  because




products are  produced that must be sold in the  competitive  marketplace.




This  element  adds additional inherent  risk.   Consequently,  I  cannot




overemphasize the importance of planning that will  undoubtedly  reduce




 the risks  inherent  in resource  recovery because  of  this  difference.

-------
          ENERGY CONSERVATION

THROUGH  IMPROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
            By Robert A.  Lowe
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
               April, 1974

-------
                      Table  of  Contents
Introduction                                               1
Energy Conservation through Source Reduction               9
Energy Recovery from Waste                               11
Energy Conservation through Recycling                    28
Energy Conservation through Improved Collection          33
Summary                                                  36
References                                               38
Appendices                                               39

-------
                        ENERGY  CONSERVATION

               THROUGH IMPROVED SOLI1.') WASTE MANAGLMINT
                            INTRODUCTION


     Recent concern about energy supplies and environmental  quality

has focused attention on how resources are used and on the effects

of resource use on the environment.  Continued growth in the con-

sumption of materials and the generation of wastes -- with their

attendant use and waste of energy -- is neither inevitable nor

necessary.  Energy could be conserved by improving upon current

materials use and waste management practices.  This paper presents

four opportunities to conserve energy through better solid waste

management:
     1.  Source Reduction
     2.  Energy Recovery
     3.  Recycling
     4.   Improved  Collec-
          tion
reducing consumption of products
or reusing products, resulting
in the use of less energy and
materials and in the reduction
in waste generation

using solid waste as a fuel in
place of coal, oil or gas

using recycled materials that
consume less energy than virgin
materials in manufacturing pro-
cesses

using waste collection trucks
more efficiently, reducing fuel
consumption

-------
                                 - 2 -
     Considered separately, the "maximum possible" energy savings from
each of these four measures is:
8/DOE*
(thousand)
115
393
80
3
B/YOE**
(tnillionj
42
143
30
1
Btu's*x*
(trillion)
244
832
172
6
Source Reduction
Energy Recovery
Recycling
Improved collection
  *B/DOE, barrels per day of oil equivalent
 **B/YOE, barrels per year of oil equivalent
***Btu's, British thermal units.  One trillion = 1 x 1012
     When considering the combination of these four energy conservation
measures, the reader  should be aware that the total energy benefits
from improved solid waste management cannot be determined by adding the
potential savings listed above.  This is because the four areas are
interrelated:  energy saved in one area may reduce the potential for
savings  in another,  For example, banning nonrefilTable beverage containers
(a source reduction measure) will reduce the amount of material available
for recycling.  Recycling combustible materials like paper will reduce
the amount of waste available for energy recovery.
     Some of the energy savings are additive.  For example, energy
recovery can be accompanied by the recycling of inorganic (noncombustible)
materials.  In fact, energy recovery Improves the economics of materials

-------
                                 "•*- ,3 ~
recycling.  This occurs because an energy recovery system can usually be
economically viable without materials recovery, although the opposite 1s
not true.  In an energy recovery system, the noncombustibia recycUble
materials are typically separated from the mixed waste (and therefore
available for recycling) even 1f they are not going to be recycled.
The additional cost of removing the recyclable materials appears to be
less than the additional revenues from the sale of those materials.
     In general, the largest quantity of energy 1s conserved by combining
measures despite the reductions in certain categories.  The potential
energy savings from combining all measures in one possible scenario are:
 Source  Reduction
 Energy  Recovery
 Recycling
 Improved Collection
B/DOE*
(thousand)
115
357
46
3
B/YOE
(million)
42
131
17
_L
Btu's
(trillion)
244
757
98
6
        Total                 521              191            1,105
 *From Scenario 3 on Table 8 in the Summary
 Note:  See footnotes to Table 8.
      Examples of the effects of certain energy conservation  measures
 on other measures will  be presented in the Energy Recovery and
 Recycling sections.   An overview of the combined energy savings from

-------
                                 . 4 -
three possible energy conservation scenarios will be presented in the
Summary.
     To put these four energy conservation opportunities in perspective,
they should be understood in the context of the flow of materials from
acquisition of natural resources, through processing and manufacturing,
to product use and waste disposal.
     Existing methods of materials use and waste generation have
two important consequences.  First, a large portion (almost 50
percent) of the Nation's energy supply is consumed by the industrial
sector.  For example, fuel is consumed by the equipment that  removes
iron ore from the ground and transports the ore  to the steel  mill.
Then energy '.s used  to melt the ore and process  it into steel.  Next,
energy  is required for the equipment that transforms the steel into
usable  products 1n the manufacturing process.  Finally, energy is
consumed in the disposal operation  (tractors on  a landfill or in a
resource recovery system).  And all along, energy is consumed in
transporting the material or product from each step to the next,
 including the final  transport step:  waste collection.  Therefore,
any  reduction in the consumption  of materials and products could
conserve energy.  The section on  Source Reduction will discuss this
further.
      Secondly,  conventional  disposal methods—landfill or  incineration
 without energy  recovery--waste  energy.  A  large  portion of the materials
 discarded  into  the waste  stream are combustible  and can be ccfverted

-------
                                   5 -
into energy, thereby conserving valuable fossil  fuels.   The waste
stream also contains valuable materials—steel,  aluminum, paper,
glass—that can be recycled.  Generally, although not in all cases,
it takes less energy to manufacture a product from recycled materials
than from virgin materials when all stages of materials acquisition,
processing, manufacturing, and transportation are considered.  To
get a better appreciation for the opportunities  for recovering
energy and recycling materials, a closer look at the waste stream
would be desirable.

The Waste Stream
     EPA estimates that about 125 million tons of municipal wastes
were generated from residential and commercial sources in the U.S.
in 1971 (3.32 Ibs/person/day).   Table 1 shows a breakdown of the
waste stream, cross-referenced by material and by product.  Product
source categories are  presented  in millions  (10^) of tons  on  an  "As
Generated" basis.  The materials in the waste stream are presented
irป millions of tons on both an "As Generated" and an "As Disposed"
  'This waste generation rate is lower than the widely quoted 190
 million tons/year (5.3 Ibs/capital/day) estimated in the 1968
 National Survey of Community Solid Waste Practices.  The National
 Survey was based on a sample of collected tonnage estimates (rather
 than systematic measurements) that were extrapolated to a national
 scale.  These more recent estimates are primarily based on national
 material production and product marketing data.  It is the judgement
 of EPA that these new figures ary accurate to within approximately
 25 percent and the 1968 survey over-estimated the national munici-
 pal solid waste stream.

-------
    s^
    if
5   o5
ซC   •"* -J
i-:   ซ.ซ






40
*>
1—
#•—
I.
Ji
a
*r













tA
0
91
ฃ
U
fc.
0
U

o
0.














X C
8 *"
5? M
ฃ5
1

1
c

C l/ป
Ol ซ3
1900
1 W>
I/) C
ซS 0
s 1—
O
sjonpoud
jaqiO

POOJ
PUB

s6u
pue
i u
saoueiiddB
Pioqasnoq
JOpB(4

6U|.6e>pPd
puv
SJ9UJ.EJU03
sauizeBBiij
puc 'S)(ooq

VI
"5
3


s.
o
•o
c
*• ฃ>• **
00 o 0- co r*. vs ~ ซvj
rC O o coeM'-c^'^*




•ป t— r- ซ~
„-,.—..,..
t— O> Oป OOOO CO CM •— PO ป-ป
*O *~








r— t— O> U>00ซ^ CM CO 00 (O O
Cft CM i— OOO *? CO •— ซ# CM
CO ^~ ••• ^"
•v o oo mr-CM ซn r-. r~ m i
oo i- co cocJes *- CM o o i
o
i i i iii i i i j •
1 1 1 III 1 1 1 ICM
t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CM
s • i i i (M in in • i
ii ! ฃ ! ! ! d d o t :

. ,- ,.._ *ซOCO 1


1 ซ7> !•ป••— •— r- ' ' '
II.**** • III
1 4-" r- r-00 O III

4- r— r— •* 1T> r— IT) 00
0 .- ซ Uป00 01 t, ป. .- 1

1 1 III '1 * 1 1
o 	 t- +5 I I



3
o
1. 1-
5. Ol
 "• <"
fc. E 4> U ซป "O
in 1. 3 jc •ป- 1- ^ -*
if. \ i> ^"t0 J3 5 >< 1ง 1
ป,i(0 .-3HJOO
•vuj^ Q- o: >— sc u_
ff\ *^ IA ^^ O^
S ? - o 8


Oป CM OS O
fe* 00 •— HO 1
JO r- CM 1
tn co •* o c"*
joป o> i— o ซซ
r—




^



.- ,- CO 0
s s; - ป :
^ w
to
o ป
is •-
CM 0
I— •"

tป> *>•


^ "^
.^1 r~

3> ">
c a
CO r^
ci ป
1
t
2
j.


ซ*r o *\
ป— S ' "ง
ซ/3 t?! **J P
O  a-
Z3 v> C S .,
o (0 •-• -S ^
i : j ^ s
ซ- w fc u
IO T- O **
>- s: H- G

-------
                                 .  7  -
basis.  "As Generated" measures the weight of the material  before
1t 1s mixed with other wastes.   "As Disposed" measures the  weight
of the material after being mixed in trash cans and collection trucks.
The difference between the two is the result of the migration of
moisture from the wetter materials (food and yard wastes) to materials
that absorb moisture  (note the increase in the weight of paper) and
to products to whose  surface the moisture adheres (such as glass and
tnetals).
     The figures in Table 1 include wastes generated  in household,
commercial and business establishments and institutions (schools,
hospitals, etc.) end  excludes  industrial process wastes, agricultural
and  animal wastes, abandoned automobiles, ashes, street sweepings,
construction and demolition debris, and sewage sludges.  The  125
million  ton figure Includes only  those materials discarded into the
waste  stream and, therefore, excludes certain amounts of newsprint,
corrugated and other  materials that are already being recycled.
      Large quantities of agricultural, forestry and industrial
wastes and sewage sludge are generated each  year.  The amount of
energy recoverable from these  wastes may be  significant; however,
these wastes are not  included  in  this analysis because the economic
feasibility of recovering energy  from them has not been determined.
      The amount of products consumed and wastes generated  has been
growing  at a rate estimated at 3  percent  per year over the last
decade.  The population increased about 13 percent during  the 1960's.

-------
                                 - 8 -
Although the population Is growing slower now than In earlier years,
the generation of wastes continues tr> Increase.
     These trends Indicate a projected 3 to 4 percent annual Increase
in the amount of wastes generated in the years ahead.  This means that
more wastes will be available for energy recovery and materials recovery.
More importantly, however, it means that the demand on supplies of
natural resources will be greater and that more energy will be required
to convert those resources into usable products.  Thus, the need to
conserve energy and to corssปe fewer products should become more apparent.

-------
                                 . 9  .
              ENERGY CONSERVATION THROUGH SOURCE REDUCTION

     Source reduction 1s defined as the reduction 1n the generation
of solid waste through a reduction 1n the consumption of materials
and products.  There are four general approaches to achieve source
reduction:

     1.  Product reuse (e.g., returnable bottles)
     2.  Reduce resource Intensiveness (e.g., smaller autos)
     3.  Increased product lifetime  (e.g., longer lasting household
         appliances)
     4.  Decreased product consumption (e.g., reduced packaging
         consumption)
Table 1 indicates some of the broed  product categories in the waste
stream that could be impacted by source reduction measures.
     Almost invariably, any source reduction action will result in
the conservation of energy.  Although the energy conservation impacts
of most of the many possible source  reduction actions have not been
quantified, an estimate was made of  the potential energy savings
resulting from a reduction in one product category, packaging, to
put the energy conservation potential of source  reduction  in per-
spective.   If per capita  packaging consumption  in 1972 were reduced
to  the levels that  existed in 1958,  over 560 trillion Btu's could
have been saved  in  1972,  tha equivalent of 267,000  B/DOE  (Appendix I)

-------
                                  10 -
     Another source reduction measure, affecting a portion of the
packaging category, is the substitution of refiliable (returnable)
beverage containers for nonrefillable (one-way) containers.  Using a
refi11 able container saves at least half of the energy required to use
a nonrefillable bottle or can.  If all beverages were shipped in
refiliable bottles in 1972 (and each bottle were used 10 times and returned
to the bottler 1n "piggy back" fashion on the return trips of the consumer's
automobile and the distributor0;; truck), about 244 trillion Btu's or
115,000 B/DOE could have been conserved.
     It is significant to note that per capita consumption of materials
has grown considerably in recent years.  Consumption of packaging
materials, for example, has grown at a rate of 2.8 percent per person
per year for the last 13 years.   Based upon projected growth rates, the
energy that could be saved by returning to 1958 per capita packaging
consumption rates will be twice as large (1,174 trillion Btu's, or
555,000 B/DOE) in 1980 as in 1972.
     The consumption of beverage containers has also grown, and continues
to grow, faster than population  growth and the consumption of beverages.
For example, while the consumption of beer and soft drinks rose 29 percent
between 1959 and 1969, the consumption of beer and soft drink containers
rose 164 percent.   Based upon projected trends continuing toward use of
nonrefillable beverage containers, if all  consumers in 1980 use refi11 able
bottles (and these bottles are used 10 times), about 421  trillion Btu's
(70 percent more than the potentials  savings estimated for 1972) or about
198,000 B/DOE coula be

-------
                                - 11  -
                      ENERGY RECOVERY FROM WASTE

Theoretical Energy Potential
     About 70 tb 80 percent of residential and commercial  wastes Is
combustible with an energy content of about 9 million Btu's per ton.
Theoretically, if all solid waste in the U.S. had been converted into
energy in 1971, about 1.1 quadrillion (1.1 x 10^5) Btu's per year would
have been generated.  This is the equivalent of over 522,000 8/DOE, or
190 million B/YOE.  The growth in population and per capita waste
generation would cause these figures to increase to 1,440 trillion Btu's
per year by 1980, or about 680,000 B/DOE or 248 million B/YOE.  These and
other findings are summarized on Table 2.  (Appendix II)
Available Energy Potential
     Not all waste is available for energy recovery.  Energy recovery
systems require large quantities (at least 200 to 250 tons per day)
of waste delivered for processing at one site in order to achieve
economies of scale.  For this reason, energy recovery appears feasible
only in more densely populated areas, such as Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's).  If energy recovery had been practiced in
all SMSA's  in  1971,  over  832 trillion  (832 x  1012)  Btu's would  have
been recovered.   This  is  equal  to over 393,000  B/DOE, or  143  million
B/YOE.  By  1980,  the energy potentially recoverable from the  SMSA waste
stream is  projected  to be about 1,085 trillion  Btu's per year,  the
equivalent  of  over  512,000  B/DOE, or 187 mil11 on  B/YOE.

-------
                                         -  12 -

                                        TABLE 2
                       ENERGY POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE FROM WASTE

                                1971                                  1980
                   Btu's*     B/DOE**     B/YOE***        Btu's      B/DOE       B/YOE
                 (trillion)  (thousand)  (million)     (trillion)  (thousand)  (mill ion)
Theoretical
Available
1,106
832
522
393
191
143
1,440
1,085
680
512
248
187
Projected
 Implementations     -           -           -              85         40          15
Potential
 Candidates          ...             553        263          96
  *Btu:    British Thermal Unit
 **B/DOE:  Barrels per day of oil equivalent.  (Assuming 5.8 million Btu's per
           barrel of oil and 365 days per year.)
***B/YOE:  Barrels per year of oil equivalent.

-------
                                -  13  -

     Using solid waste as an energy source offers several distinct
benefits:

     1.  Replaces the use of fossil fuels.
     2.  Produces low sulfur oxide emissions because solid
         waste has a low sulfur content.
     3.  Reduces the amount of land needed for disposal  sites.
     4.  Is a readily available, growing—rather than depleting
         —domestic source of energy.

-------
                                - 14 -
Projected Implementations of Energy Recovery Systems
     At the present time, energy 1s being recovered from post-consumer
solid waste 1n only one location in the U.S.:  in St. Louis, Missouri
at an EPA-supported demonstration plant operated by the City of
St. Louis and the Union Electric Company.
      Interest in energy recovery 1s Increasing across the country.   Several
more  systems (Including another Federally supported demonstration  plant)
will  be operating before  the end of 1975.  About 40 additional communities
are seriously considering the  recovery of energy from waste.
      Based on energy  recovery  projects existing or planned  at the  present
time, 1t  1s projected that  by  1980 almost 30 cities and counties around
the country should be operating the equivalent of about thirty-six
1,000 ton-per-day plants, recovering an  estimated 85 trillion Btu's
per year, or 40*000 B/DOE,  or  15 million B/YOE.
     A list of communities where energy recovery systems are underway
or planned is  included in Table 3.   This  list represents those
cofltnunities that have already taken definite steps  (by  conducting a
feasibility study,  by vote of the county  legislative  body, or by some
similar step)  towards  implementation of an  energy recovery system.
However, there are many other cities that are potential candidates
for energy recovery systems.

-------
                                -  15  -
                                TABLE 3
   PROJECTED IMPLEMENTATIONS OF L^ERGY RECOVERY SYSTEMS BY  1980
State
California
Connecticut
City


San Diego


Bridgeport
Tons of Solid Waste
     Per Day (1980)
        200
      1,200
 District of Columbia
Illinois
 Iowa
 Washington
       1,000
Chicago                         2,000
Chicago area, outside city      1,000

Ames                              200
Maryland
Baltimore
Montgomery County
       1,000
       1,200
Massachusetts
Braintree
East Bridgewater
   (near Brockton)
Lawrence
Saugus
   (near Boston)
         240
       1,200

       1,000
       1,200
 Missouri
 St.  Louis
       8,000
 New Jersey
 New York
 Ohio
 Essex County (Newark  area)       1,000
 Hackensack Meadowlands           2,000
 Union County (Elizabeth)  or
   Middlesex County
   (New Brunswick)                1,000

 Albany      -                      50ฐ
 Hempstead,  L.I.                  1,000
 Monroe County  (Rochester)          500
 New York City                    2,000
 Westrhester County
   (White Plains)                 1,500

 Akron                           1,000
 Cleveland                         500

-------
                                - 16
                                     Continued
State
                                      "ons of Solid Waste
                                           Per Day _
Oregon


Pennsylvania


Puerto Rico
            Eugen*


            Philadelphia


            San Juan
  700


2,400


1,000
Tennessee
            Knoxville
            Memphis
            Nashville

Tbtal~Tons Per Day in 1980


Number of equivalent 1000 tons
  per day plants


Energy rfccoverablฉ in 1980
  500
  500
  750
                                                            36", 290'
                                                                36
                                                                85 trillion Btu's
                                                                   per year

                                                            40,000 barrel^
                                                                   per day of  • ""
                                                                   equival ..•

                                                                15 million barrels
                                                                   per year of
                                                                   oil equivalent

-------
                               - 17 -
Potential Candidates:  Areas Where Local  Conditions Favor
     Energy Recovery

     In some areas, there are certain local conditions that favor the

implementation of energy recovery systems.  These include:


     1.  Economics - where disposal costs are high because inexpen-
                     sive close-by land is not available or because
                     alternative fuel costs are high.

     2.  Markets   - where local market conditions exist to take
                     advantage of available technology.  These
                     conditions include a boiler suitable for burn-
                     ing waste or a network for distributing steam
                     for heating downtown buildings.
     3.  Public    - where public officials are likely to select
          Interest   energy recovery over other options because of
                     the popularity among their constituents of
                     energy recovery as an environmental or energy
                     issue.
     Using these local conditions as screening criteria, EPA has

identified 48SMSA's as potential candidates for energy recovery.

These  48SMSA's are metropolitan areas that include at least 100 to

150 separate county or city governmental units.  A list of these

SMSA's is  included 1n Table 4.  These are  the areas where energy

recovery could  be feasible by  1980, while  the previous list  (Table 3)

indicated  recovery systems that are expected to be implemented.  The

distinction between  the  two lists  is the difference between  actual

implementations and  opportunities  for implementation.  The energy

recoverable from all  the residi.^ial and commercial waste in these

48 areas in 1980 would be equal  to over- 263,000 B/DOE, or 96 million  B/YOE.

-------
                               - 18 -
                                TABLE 4

                   POTENTIAL CANDIDATE AREAS (SMSA's)
                      FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN 1974
          with potential energy recoverable projected  to 1980
 Note:   Recoverable energy is a function  of waste  generation,
        which is a function of population
       Standard Metropolitan
       Statistical Areas
Population
   1970
(thousands)
 1.   New York,  New York
 2.   Chicago,  Illinois
 3.   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 4.   Detroit,  Michigan
 5.   Washington, D.C. - Mdซ  - Va.
 6.   Boston, Massachusetts
 7.   Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 8.   St. Louis, Missouri
 9.   Baltimore, Maryland
10.   Cleveland, Ohio
11.   Newark, Lew Jersey
12.   Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minnesota
13.   Milwaukee, Wisconsin
14.   Atlanta,  Georgia
15.   Cincinnati, Ohio
16.   Patterson, New Jersey
17.   San Diego, California
18.   Buffalo,  New York
19.   Miami, Florida
20.   Denver, Colorado
21.   Portland, Oregon
22.   Columbus, Ohio
23.   Providence, Rhode Island
24.   Rochester, New York
25.   San Antonio, Texas
26.   Louisville, Kentucky
27.   Memphis, Tennessee
28.   Albany, New York
29.   Toledo, Ohio
30.   Akron, Ohio
31.   Hartford, Connecticut
32.   Gary,  Indiana
33.   Jersey City, New Jersey
34.   Nashville, Tennessee
35.   Jacksonville, Florida
36.   Wilmington, Delaware
37.   Knoxville, Tennessee
  11,572
   6,,979
   4,818
   4,200
   2,861
   2,754
   2,401
   2,363
   2,071
   2,064
   1,857
   1,814
   1,404
   1,390
   1,385
   1,359
   1,358
   1,349
   1,268
   1,228
   1,009
     916
     911
     883
     864
     827
     770
     722
     693
     679
     664
     633
     609
     541
     529
     499
     400

-------
                                -  19
                          TABL!
Continued
38.   Bridgeport, Connecticut
39.   New Haven, Connecticut
40.   Peoria, Illinois
41.   Little Rock, Arkansas
42.   Chattanooga, Tennessee
43.   Madison, Wisconsin
44.   Rockford, Illinois
45^.  Lawrence, Massachusetts
46.  Charleston, West Virginia
47.  Eugene, Oregon
48.  Brockton, Massachusetts
              356
              342
              323
              305
              290
              272
              232
              230
              213
              190
     Total population, 1970
            71,786
     Total population, 1980
            78,462
     Waste generation, 1980  (annual)
                             (daily)
             62.0 million tons
              170 thousand tons
     Number of equivalent 1000 TPD plants
              170
      Energy recoverable
              558 trillion Btu's per year

          263,000 barrels per day of
                  oil equivalent

               96 million barrels per
                  year of oil equivalent

-------
                        Energy Recovery Products

     Solid waste can be used as or converted into any of five individual
energy products (Reference 1):
     1.   Steam
     2.   Solid fuel          \
     3.   Liquid fuel
     4.   Gaseous fuel
     5.   Electricity

     To aid in conceptualizing the stats of the art of energy recovery,
this section presents these five energy products  and distinguishes them
from one another at the point.of sale.  This distinction is made be-
cause the selection of an energy recovery system will be made primarily
on the basis of marketing considerations; that is, the system will be
designed so that its products will be accepted by the potential customers
in the market.
     Two of the five products—steam and electricity--are end-products.
Steam is also an intermediate product when it is used to generate
electricity.  Solid, liquid and gaseous fuels are raw materials that
can be burned to produce either end-product* steam or electricity.
These fuels can come either from fossil resources (coal, oil or gas)
or from solid waste  (shredded/classified waste-fuel, or pyrolysis oil

-------
or gas).  Therefore, solid waste can be a source of energy, whether
it is sold as steam, fuel or electricity.

Steam
     By burning  solid waste  in  a water wall  incinerator,  steam can  be
generated for use  in  (1) heating and  cooling buildings  (district
heating and cooling)  and (2) industrial  manufacturing.
     Technically,  steam recovery is the best-developed  method for
recovering the energy value  in  solid  waste.   But marketing steam  is
often  a difficult  task  because  (1)  steam is  not storable  and (2)  can
be transported only over very short distances.   Nevertheless, many
cities have steam  distribution  networks already established.
      The Nashville (Tennessee) Thermal Transfer Corporation, a private
  non-profit  corporation, will soon  begin full scale operation of a  facility
  to produce  steam  and chilled water for heating and cooling  downtown
  buildings.   The energy will be provided by  a water wall  incinerator fueled
  entirely (except  for emergency situations)  by  solid waste.  Steam  and
  chilled water will be  sold  at  prices that result in substantial  savings
  to customers.  At the  same  time, the revenues  from these sales will pay
  for all capital and  operating  costs, including underground distribution
  lines.  Moreover, the  City  will be able to  dump Us waste at the plant at
  no charge.  (The  City  is responsible for disposing of  the residue.)
       Rather than  build a new water wall incinerator  to produce and sell
  steam, it may be more economical  to sell  the waste as  a fuel  to  supplement
  the fossil fuels used in existing  * x-am generating boilers.

-------
                                - 22 -
Solid Fuel
     Solid waste can be sold in solid form as a substitute for conventional
fossil fuels in existing or newly 5.J?signed combustion units.  The major
markets for solid waste fuel are (1) utility boilers (2) Industrial steam
and steam-electric boilers, and (3) district heating and cooling facilities
(i.e., heating downtown buildings).
     The  largest and most readily available boilers are electric
utility boilers.  Because most of these boilers are suspension fired
(the fuel  burns in mid-air  in a residence time of one or two  seconds),
the pieces of solid waste fuel must be reduced in size  (by shredding,
milling or pulping) so that they can be burned in the boilers' short
residence time.  Burning prepared solid waste as a supplement to coal
in an  existing utility boiler has been demonstrated in  St. Louis,  Missouri.
This  system  is described in Energy  Recovery from Waste.   (Reference 2;
      The  prerequisite for this application is that the  boilers
must  be capable of handling ash--both bottom ash and fly ash.  All
boilers designed to burn coal have  ash handling equipment.  Although
many  coal-burning boilers were subsequently retrofitted to burn oil or
gas,  the  ash handling equipment is  still operable in most cases.
Where  the Boilers Are:  A Survey of Electric Ut1lity Boilers  with
Potential  Capacity for Burning Solid Waste as a Fuel  (Reference  3)
describes the location, design characteristics and the  refuse-burning
 capacity of most of the utility  boilers  in  the  U.S.  capable of burning
 solid waste.

-------
011 and Gas through Pyrolysls
     To enable solid waste to be used In boilers that do not have
ash-handling capabilities, the solid waste can be converted into a
combustible liquid or gas using a process known as pyrolysis.
     Pyrolysis 1s the thermal degradation of organic substances in an
oxygen deficient atmosphere.  The concept is under development by nearly
a dozen different private and public organizations.  The primary
motivation is to develop a system wherein solid waste can be converted
into a storable, transportable fuel—either liquid or gas.  Once this
is done, many of the constraints that limit the marketability of solid
waste as a fuel are minimized.
     At this time, several pyrolysis systems have been demonstrated
at the pilot plant level, 4  to 150 tons per day, but no full-scale
systems are operational.  Several plants will be operational within
the  next year or two.  Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, Inc. is building
a  1,000 ton per day gas pyrolysis plant in Baltimore, Maryland with
EPA  support.  Union Carbide  Corporation is building a 200 ton  per day
 gas pyrolysis plant in South Charleston, West Virginia.  And Garrett
 Research  &  Development Corporation is building a 200 ton per day oil
 pyrolysis plant  in San Diego County, California, also with EPA support.
 By 1980,  sufficient experience should be gained to make this a viable
 option  for  widespread implementation.

-------
                                - 24 -
Gas:  Methane Recovered from Landfills
     Gases are produced in land disposal sites as a result of the
microbiological decomposition of the organic matter (such as food, paper
and yard wastes) placed in the landfill.  One of these gases is methane,
a combustible gas that is the main component of natural gas.  These gases
can be recovered and used either as a fuel in engines designed to run cr
methane or, after treatment to remove impurities, as a substitute for
natural gas in conventional commercial pipelines.
     At the present time* methane is being recovered at only one site:
a pilot plant operated by the Los Angeles Power and Water Company on the
City of Los Angeles' Sheldon-Arleta Landfill.  Plans are already underway
to  expand this facility and another.
     Methane recovery utilizes available technology, but there are still
several unknowns.  The most iir^rtant unknown is the length of time that
landfills will produce methane.  Nevertheless, the economics of  this
energy recovery  option are becoming more favorable as  the value  of
natural gas  increases.
 Electricity
      Instead of selling  prepared waste  as a  solid  fuel,  solid  waste  can
 be converted into electricity;  and  then the  electricity  can be sold.
 There are two ways of doing  this:   steam-electric  boilers  and  gas  turbines,
 These two options have significant  shortcomings  at the present time.

-------
                                - 25 -
The economics of steam-electric boilers are most favorable when they
are large enough to have economies of scale and when the heating value
per unit of volume of the fuel is hign (and thus less boiler area is
required for combustion).  Steam-electric boilers designed to burn only
solid waste appear to be less economical than boilers designed to burn
waste in combination with fossil fuels because (1) the heating value of
waste fuel per unit of boiler combustion area is lower than fossil fuels
and  (2) the amount of waste that can be delivered economically to one
site is far lower than fossil fuels.  Gas turbines using solid waste as
an energy source are encountering technical difficulties.  Therefore,
at the present time, selling electricity produced from waste appears to
be an option  that is less advanced  than those discussed above.

               Effect of Paper Recycling on  Energy Recovery

      Waste paper can be recycled as a fiber source;  or it  can be
 converted to energy.  (Recycled paper can be converted to
 energy at a later time.)  At the time of disposal,  these options-
 recycling or energy recovery—are mutually  exclusive.   Obviously,
 the effect of removing paper from the waste stream is  important in
 the management and design of an energy recovery system.

-------
                                -  26  -
     Paper can be removed from the waste stream 1n several  ways:
     1.   Source separation:       separating paper at the home or
                                 fi,:tory for recycling before it is
                                 mixed with other wastes during the
                                 collection process

     2.   Hand picking:           removal of bundled paper from the
                                 mixed waste

     3.   Mechanical separation:  removal of paper fiber by mechan-
                                 ically processing the mixed waste
                                 stream
     Only certain types of paper products can be segregated at  the

source and collected economically for recovery.   (Reference 4)

These grades of paper, which account ^or about 47 percent of  all  the

paper in the waste  stream are:


     1.  Newspapers from residential sources,

     2.  Corrugated from commercial rind industrial  sources, and

     3.  Mixed office  papers



     It  is  estimated that 40 to 60 percent 2 of this paper could

realistically be  recovered.   Expressed  as  a percentage of all  the

paper in the waste stream,  this represents a recovery rate of about

27 percent.
 Available  paper excludes  the  caper presently being recycled;  recovery
 percentages would  be higher  r.  presently  recycled  reaper were  included.

-------
     Table 5 shows the effect on the heating (energy) value of the
waste stream at various rates of recovery through source separation
of the available paper grades (newsprint, corrugated and mixed office
papers).

                                TABLE 5
                       EFFECT OF SOURCE SEPARATION
            of Newspaper, Corrugated and Mixed office papers

    Recovery Rate                           Reduction in Heating Value
(percent of all paper)                     of the Waste Stream (percent)
          OX                                           0%
         15                                            4
         27                                            7
         35                                            9

      If energy recovery  had  been  practiced  in all  SMSA's  in 1972
simultaneously with  a 35 percent  rate of source  separation  and  recycling
of paper,  the  amount of  energy  recoverable  from  waste would have  been
reduced about  9 percent, from 393,000 B/DOE to 357,000  B/DOE.   The energy
consequences of producing paper from recycled fiber will  be discussed
 in the following section.

-------
                                - 28 -
                 ENERGY CONSERVATION THROUGH RECYCLING

     Recycling generally conserves energy:  when two production systems
are compared—one using virgin materials and the other using recycled
(secondary) materials—the system using recycled materials most often
consumes less energy when all stages of materials acquisition, processing
and transportation are included.
     The technical feasibility of recovering materials from the
municipal waste stream has been demonstrated.  Had currently-known
technology been applied in 1972 to residential and commercial solid
wastes in metropolitan areas, almost 14 million tons of steel,
aluminum and glass could potentially have been recovered and substituted
for their  /.rgln material counterparts.
     Such a substitution, basef on preliminary estimates, (Appendix III)
would have yielded a national primary energy saving of about 172 trillion
Btu's per year in 1972, or the equivalent of 80,000 B/DOE.  Moreover,
the potential energy savings from recycling in the future is expected to
grow in proportion to projected increases in the consumption of
recyclable materials.  (Table 6)
     In the area of paper recycling, using recycled fiber in the paper
and paperboard production systems appears to require less energy than
using virgin woodpulp.  However, r:c estimates of the potential energy
savings have been preserved  in this analysis for three reasons.  First,
independently developed estimates e^ the energy effects of paper

-------
                               -  29 -
                              TABLE 6
               NATIONAL  ENERGY  SAVINGS  FROM MAXIMUM POSSIBLE
                 RECYCLING CF ALUMINUM,  FERROUS, AND  GLASS
                  FRACTIONS OF  POST-CONSUMER  SOLID WASTE
                           [TRILLIONS OF BTU'S]*
Materials**
Alurir.un 146-56% ]
Ferrous [63-67%]
Glass [50-52% ]
Total Energy
1972
82
81
	 8
172
•
1975
115
87
	 13
215
1980
164
95
15
274
1985
212
107
	 16_
335
1990
274
116
	 16_
406
 •Energy savings are based on "total system" analyses which include
  primary energy required for raw material acquisition and electricity
  input as well as for principal refining processes.

**Figures in brackets indicate percenc&ges of the individual material
  in nation-wide solid waste assumed to be recoverable from a "maximum
  possible" recovery effort.  Lower percentages are for earlier years,
  higher percentages for later years when larger proportions of popula-
  is expected to reside in SMSA's and when extraction efficiency expected
  to rise.  Recovery quantities based on residential and commercial
  solid waste only.

-------
                                  30 -
recycling differ materially in certain significant quantitative details.
Until these estimates are systematically and thoroughly compared and
reconciled, meaningful data are not available.   Secondly, the more energy
intensive virgin pulping operation typically derive at, least pa^t of
their energy requirements from bark and other wood wastes rather than
from fossil fuel sources.  In some cases, by-product energy derived from
spent pulping liquors is sufficient to supply all of or more than the
pulping energy requirements.  Thirdly, a satisfactory definition of the
"maximum possible" paper recycling scenario has not been developed, mainly
because there are a great many variables on both the supply and demand sides
of the waste paper utilization picture,  Unlike the other three waste materials
previously estimated  (aluminum, ferrous, and glass) the potential incremental
supply of post-consumer waste riber supply would be not only a very laroe
fraction of total national fiber ccr^sration, it could also be directed
(from a technical standpoint) Into an almost infinite variety of product
use  patterns.

Effect of  Source.Reduction on Recycling
      It was mentioned earlier that  implementation  of one energy conservation
measure may reduce  the  benefits from  another.  One example  of  this  is  the
effect of  source reduction on the potential  energy savings  from recycling.
Because source  reduction will decrpปso  the  amount  of materials  available
for  recycling,  the  potent*-1  energy savings  resulting from  recycling will
also be reduced  by  source reduction   Therefore, the energy savings from

-------
                                -  31  -

source reduction of recyclable materials and the energy savings  from
recycling are not additive.
     However, based on estimates involving beverage containers,  the
energy savings from source reduction appear to be greater than the
energy savings from recycling.  For example, as was noted earlier,
if all consumers had used only refillable bottles in 1972, about
244 trillion Btu's or  115,000 B/DOE could have been saved because of
source reduction.
     But this source reduction action would have removed about 6.2
million tons of material from the waste stream that could have been
recycled.  This assumes that steel and aluminum beverage cans would
not have been used because they cannot be refilled; it also assumes
that refill able bottles would make 10 "trips" (the original and 9
successive fillings).  The effect on materials used, in millions of
tons, would have been  as follows:
    Beverage Container          Beverage  Container       Beverage  Container
  Materials Used in 1972     Materials Used  in an        Materials  Removed
                             All-returnable  System    from the Waste Stream
Aluminum
Steel
Glass

.5
2.0
6.2
8.7

-
2.5
2.5
.5
2.0
3.7
6.2
     If these 6.2 minion tons of materials had not been available for
recycling in 1972 because of an all-refillable bottle program, the effect
on Table 6 above would have been as follows:

-------
                                   - 32 -
Materials

Aluminum

Ferrous

Glass
  Energy Savings
   from Maximum
Possible Recycling
       1972
 (trillion Btu's)

        82

        81

        _8

       172
   Energy Savings
   "Lost" because
of use of Refiliable
    Bottles-1972
  (trillion Btu's)

         55

         16
                                            73
   Energy Savings
   from Recycling
when only RefiHable
  Bottles are used
        1972
  (trillion Btu's)

         27

         65

         _ง.

         98
   Thus,  if an all-refiliable bottle program were in effect in 1972,

   250  trillion  Btu's  could  have been  saved because of source reduction,

   but  the energy savings  from  recycling would have been reduced by

   73 trillion Btu's.   In  t*?rms of  barrels per day of oil equivalent,  115,000

   B/DOE  could be saved because of  this source reduction measure, while

   the  potential savings from recycling would be reduced by 34,000 B/DOC

    (from  80,000  B/DOE  to 46,000 B/DOE).

-------
                                - 33 -
           ENERGY CONSERVATION THROUGH IMPROVED COLLECTION

     The preceding sections focused on the energy conservation impacts
associated with producing and recycling the waste materials themselves.
An additional energy conservation opportunity is associated with the
collection of solid waste.  Solid waste collection is highly dependent
on fuel, but there are several short and long range steps which can
be taken to conserve energy (Reference 5).
Background
     Solid waste collection and land disposal consume 287 million
gallons of gasoline and 326 million gallons of diesel fuel per year.
Of these figures, collection operations consume approximately all of
the gasoline and half of the difcsel fuel.  Almost three-quarters of
the fuel used fcr solid waste collection is consumed in residential
collection.
     Use of diesel fuel for solid waste collection and disposal is
about 3.6 percent of all highway use of diesel fuel.  Use of gasoline
for solid waste collection is about 1.6 percent of all truck use
of gasoline.
Energy Conservation Measures
     The following short range steps could be taken to reduce energy
requirements for residential col id waste collection:

-------
                                  34  -
    1.  If communities that presently collect solid waste twice a
        week were to collect only once a week, those communities
        could save 29 percent of the fuel used for collection.
     2.  Communities with  separate collection of  food waste  could
        essentially halve their  fuel requirements  by collecting all
        wastes  at once.   However, separate  collection  of  newspaper
        and  other materials  for  resource  recovery  should  be encouraged
        because the energy saved in  the recycling  process typically
        offsets the additional fuel  required for collection.
     3.  A savings of  5  percent could be made in  those  communities
        which have  poor routing.
     4.  Other short term changes include:
        a.   Improved  storage practices
        b.   Conversion  from backyard to curbside pick-up
        c.   Minimizing  separate  pick-ups  for bulky items
        d.   Placing waste in clusters  or  on one  side of the street
        e.   Reducing  street sweeping operations
     Long  term actions  include use of transfer  stations where warranted,
use of better and properly sized  collection  equipment,  elimination of
situations where several  private  collectors  operate on  the same street,
and location of disposal  sites nearer to population centers.

-------
                                -  35  -
Impact
     On a national basis, it 1s estimated that 18.2 million gallons of
diesel fuel and 39.1 million gallons of gasoline per year would have been
saved by changing from twlce-a-week to once-a-week collections (excluding
inner-city areas) and by using better routing patterns for collection.
This is based on levels of service and equipment utilization in the
1972-1973 time period.  This savings 1s the equivalent of 3,000 B/DOE.

-------
                                - 36 -
                               SUMMARY

     The energy conservation measures described above could be combined
in a variety of ways.  Table 8 presents the "maximum feasible1  energy
conservation benefits from three sample scenarios.  Note that energy
recovery and recycling of noncombustible materials are compatible.  Note
also in Scenario 2 that, when paper is recycled, the overall fossil fuel
conservation potential  is reduced;  however,  there are resource
conservation and other environmental  impacts associated with recycling
paper that may offset a reduction,  if any, in potential energy  savings.
And note that the combination of source reduction and recycling
(Scenario 3) offers a larger potential energy savings than either
option by itself.
     Of the three scenarios depicted  in Table 8, Scenario 3 offers the
greatest potential  benefits, 521,000  B/DOE.   This is a significant
quantity of energy.  By comparison, 521,000 B/DOE is equal  to:
     7 percent of all the fuel consumed by utilities in 1970
          (7.1 million B/DOE
    14 percent of all the coal consumed by utilities in 1970
          (3.7 million B/DOE)
    35 percent of the oil projected to be delivered through the Alaskan
          Pipe Line (1.5 million B/DOE)
    52 percent of the crude oil imported directly from the Middle East in
          Sept., 1973 (1.0 million B/DOE)
   1.5 percent of all energy consumed in the U.S. in 1970
          (32.5 million B/DOE)

-------
                                Table 8

           Combined Energy Savings from Three "Maximum Possible"
                 Energy Conservation Scenarios for 1972
              (thousand barrels per day of oil equivalent)
                     Scenario 1            Scenario 2           Scenario 3


                                                               Energy Recovery,
                     Energy Recovery      Energy Recovery      Paper and Materials
                     Recycling and        Recycling, Improved  Recycling, Improved
                     Improved Collection  Collection and       Collection and
                                          Source Separation    Source Reduction
Energy Recovery

Recycling2

Improved Collection

Source Separation?

Source Reduction*
393
80
3
-
•^— ^M—
;al 476
3571
80
3
N.A.
^MMUM
440
3571
46
3
N.A.
115_
521
1 Energy content of wastes reduced 9 percent by source separation.  See note 3.

^Recycling of noncombustible materials:  aluminum, glass and steel.

3Source separation and recycling of newsprint, corrugated and mixed office waste
 papers at a recovery rate of 35 percent of the paper in the waste stream.
A
 Source reduction refers to the beverage container example described above:
 it assumes that all consumers used ref11 Table bottles and that each bottle
 made 10 trips.


 N.A. - Data on the energy savings from recycling paper are not
        available.  See page 28.

-------
                                  38 -
                              REFERENCES
1.   Levy, Steven J., Energy Recovery Markets and Technology, to be
         published by the U.S.  Environmental Protection Aaency,
         Washington, D.C. 20460,  1974.
2,  Lowe, Robert A., Energy Recovery  from Waste, Publication Number
         SW-36 d.11, U.S.  Env 1 rohmenta 1  Protectlon Agency, Washing-
         ton, D.C.  20460,  1973.
3.  Gordlan Associates Incorporated,  Where  the  Boilers /^e-  A Survey
         of Electric Utility Boilers  with Potential "crpicitv for Burn-
         Ing Solid Waste as a Fuel, to  be published  by the U.S. Environ-
         mental Protection Agency, Washington,  D.C.  20460, 1974.
4.  Holloway, J. Robert, The Effect of Removing  Paper  on  the  Fuel
         Value of Solid Waste, to be published bv the  U.S. Environ-
         mental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.  20460, 1974.
5.  Shuster, Kenneth, Analysis if Fuel  Consumption  for  Solid Waste
         Management, unpublished"report,  U.S.  Environmental Protection
         Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460,  1974.

-------
                               - 39 -
                             APPENDICES
  I    National  Energy  Savings  from  Source Reduction—Packaging:
           An Estimate of Possible  Impact, by Michael Loube
 II    Methodology for Determining  the Amount  of Energy Potentially
           Recoverable from Waste,  by Robert  A. Lowe
III   National  Energy Savings  from Materials  Recycling:  Some
           "Maximum Possible"  Estimates  for Ferrous Metals,
           Aluminum and Glass, by Frank  A. Smith

-------
                              APPENDIX I
            NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS FROM SOURCE REDUCTION
              PACKAGING:  AN ESTIMATE OF POSSIBLE IMPACT

                          by  Michael Loube
Introduction

     Source reduction is defined as the reduction in consumption of
materials and products which also results in a reduction in the generation
of wastes.  The source reduction concept has grown out of the thesis that
solid waste is an effluent theoretically easier to reduce than dispose.
Almost by definition most source reduction actions will result in energy
savings.

     There are four major technical approaches that can be used to achieve
source reduction.  They are:  1) reuse of products, 2) reduced resource
intensity of products, 3} increased lifetime of products, and 4) decreased
consumption of products.  The energy savings in the packaging sector
described in this paper concern two of these approaches.  First, there is
an analysis of the energy savings arising from the reuse of the beverage
(beer and soft drink) container portion of packaging materials.  Secondly
there is ar, enalysls of the energy savings achieved if the consumption
of all packaging materials (other than beverage containers) could be
reduced.
Findings

     1.  Reuse of Beverage Containers

         A source reduction program tailored toward the reuse of beer
     and soft drink containers  (Tables 1-2) will produce a substantial
     reduction in total energy  required for' the consumption of beverages,
     A shift from the current mix of one-way and refill able beverage
     containers to a system of  all refiliable containers (the average
     container being used ten times) would have saved in 1972 a total of
     244 trillion Btu's.  This  potential energy savings is equivalent
     to about 115,000 barrels of oil, or slightly more than .3% of the
     nation's total primary energy (fossil fuels plus hydroelectric plus
     nuclear).  By 1980, given  the anticipated growth in beverage consumption
     and shifts between container types, t^e annual savings that would be
     generated from a switch to an all refiliable system would have
     increased to approximately 421 trillion Ctu's  (about 200,000 barrels
     of oil per day).

-------
                             1-2
2.  Reduced Consumption of Packaging (Excluding Beverage Containers)

    The energy savings achievable from a source reduction measure
that would reduce the consumption of packaging (other than beverage
containers) were also estimated (Table 3).  Since packaging must
protect the product an attempt was made to set as a maximum reduction
only the removal of "excess" packaging.  This was estimated by
identifying the maximum reduction possible as equivalent to 1958
packaging consumption (i.e., the percentage of each material used
in packaging in 1958 was assumed to remain constant).  Economic
growth and increased product consumption since 1958 was then estimated
(equal to the Increase in non-durable goods purchased) and total
packaging consumption was increased to derive a goal for reduced
packaging.

     The potential  energy  savings from  reduced packaging  (excluding
beverage  containers)  would  have been,  in  1971, 322  trillion Btu's.
This savings  is equivalent  to  about  150,000  barrels of oil
per  day or  about  .5%  of the nation's total primary  energy.  By
1980,  the annual  savings  that  would  be generated  by decreased
packaging consumption would have increased to 753 trillion  Btu's
 (about 356,000  barrels of oil  per  day).


3.   Energy  Savings,  all packaging  materials

     These two source  reduction measures (reuse of beverage  con-
 tainers,  and  reduced  packaging consumption)  are  additive (Table 4).
Therefore the total  energy  savings potentially available in the
packaging area  are:

                     1)  In 1971, 566  trillion Btu's  (equivalent
                        to 267,000  barrels of oil  per day,  or
                        18%  of  total  primary  energy)

                     2)  In 1980,  1174 trillion  Btu's (equivalent
                        to 555,000  barrels of oil  per day,  or
                        1.7% of present total primary energy
                        demand)


4.   Alternative  Energy Saving  Mechanisms

     While source  reduction  measures  designed to  reduce or  reuse
packaging materials  provide substantial energy savings,  they do
impact other  potential resource recovery  mechanisms.  The  poten-
tial impact on  three  resource  eco/ery techniques is  discussed

-------
                             1-3
below.  Impacts are identified for:  1) Separate Collection,
2) Materials Recovery Systems, and 3} Energy Recovery Systems.

A.  Separate Collection - Most separate collection activity
currently centers on newspapers being segragated by the house-
holder.  Source reduction of packaging materials would have no
impact on this activity.

    A few cities have tried (mostly unsuccessfully) to collect
bottles and cans separately.  Reuse of beverage containers would
probably eliminate the  need and potential economic viability  of
this activity.
    Separate collection of corrugated boxes (a packaging material)
is practiced (and currently increasing) by some commercial establishments.
Since source reduction would probably be accomplished by changing
the design of this packaging material ir. such a way as to use less
material or to be reusable, or both, source reduction and separate
collection of corrugated packaging could be complementary activities.
Both are aimed toward reducing the ultimate waste disposal of
packaging materials.

B.  Mate*"'a.s Recovery Syr?terns - Few municipal materials recovery
systems are currently in existence, but numerous cities are examining
their potential (either by themselves or in conjunction with energy
recovery systems).  If these s>;;tetr$ had operated in all metropolitan
areas in 1972, the energy saved by recycling the aluminum, glass,
and ferrous portions of post-consumer solid waste would have been
172 trillion Btu's (or the equivalent of about 80,000 barrels of
oil per day).  A source reduction measure designed to reuse beverage
containers while saving 244 trillion Btu's would reduce the potential
savings from materials recovery (Table 5) by 73 trillion Btu's.

    Therefore, material recovery by itself could save 172 trillion
Btu's; source reduction of beverage containers by itself could
save 244 trillion Btu's.  Combined, the two measures would save
343 trillion Btu's as follows:

    Energy Savings from Recycling and Source Reduction Cbmbined

    Energy savings from recycling alone           172

    less:  energy savincs "lost" when
        recycling and strjru. reduction
        measures are combined                     _73_

           Net savings from recychrg              99

-------
                            1-4
    plus:   energy savings from source
        reduction (refillable bottle
        program)                                  244

           Total savings from Combined
              Measures                            343
    This analysis assumes that the glass remaining in the waste
stream with a refill able beverage container system would not be
easier to recover for recycling than it is now.  This would
probably not be true since most glass bottles (even though not
refillable because of cracks or chips) would be returned to the
supermarket or bottler.  The glass bottle waste stream would
no doubt be substantially segregated from the general waste
stream and therefore easier to recover.

    However the effect on energy savings wculd be small.  An
additional 0.7 trillion Btu's would be savf.'d (assuming glass
recovery efficiency would Increase from 50" for normal municipal
recovery to 70% for recovery from a segregated glass bottle waste
stream).

C.  Energy .Recovery Systems - Few municipal energy recovery systems
are currently In existence, but numerous cities are examining their
potential.  If these systems had operated in all metropolitan areas
1n 1972, the energy available for use would have been about
832 trillion Btu's.
            •eduction of packaging materials would  remove  some  of
             (combustible) materials  from  the waste stream.   This
    Source reduction
the organic
would result 1n a reduction in the energy available to energy
recovery systems 1n the amount of 82.4 trillion Btu's (Table 6).
Energy recovery by Itself could save 832 trillion Btu's (see
Table 2 in the text); removing combustible materials by source
reduction would reduce the energy recovery potential by 82 trillion
Btu's to 750 trillion Btu's.  However, this 750 trillion Btu savings
would be added to the 322 trillion Btu saving attributable to source
reduction, for a combined savings of 1,072 trillion Btu's.

-------
                            1-5
5.  Net Source Reduction Savings

    The total potential energy  avlngs from source reduction of
packaging materials including beverage containers would amount
to about 566 trillion Btu's in 1972.  Various combinations -f
source reduction approaches, materials recovery and energy
recovery systems would provide increased energy savings (Table 7).
If all three systems were in existence In 1972, the energy saved
would have amounted to 1,415 trillion Btu's.

-------
Page  1-6
                                                         (N
                                                         fl
                                                                                        in
                                                                                                     CN
                                                                                                                    in
                                                                                                                    0)

                                                                                                                    •rH
                                                                                                                    4-)
                                                                                                                    Ifl

                                                                                                                    M
                                                                                                                    0)
                                                                                                                    4J




















rH

a
8

















































i
n} to
rl M
$S
rl -H
PH Id
43
G C
0 0
•H U
4J
s-s
T3 *rl
fl) Vj
ซ s
*"N
0) 4J 
u\ ซ
c n
-H
> 
^"t
to X)
ซ
>1 CO
tn 3
CU K
c
H




























rH (3 4J VO
•M M
a?
si
n n
q
sง
*^*l
>jrH
S-H
M -H
4) M
M ^
U ^"^
rt 3 >J S ' ' '
**• v+ ปปn ^H
•P 03
S


4J

SCU
•P ^J1 TT CO ^ 1
0 co m ^r > in
* >4 rH r-i
& r/3j







CN
•o • .-^
0) N n
M O -
•H g
3 C 4J
von
s •|H
K rH C
r-t O
$31
U rH
SU -rl
0 B
61 O, ซS




f O r^ n
co m TJ ^j<
•H m r>ป Tf











•o
0
rlrH
O —
> •
•rl N
H O
. S c
o
0 -H
0> rH
ซ rH
rl -H
0 ฃ
> *^
J$
n
0
rH -q.
J3 E m
 0
J-> OJ O
0
ฃ rH



•P ^*  ?;
0 0 in en PO r^
to 4J ^ ป .. ป
0 co n o ซ" co
rl >1 Cft VO O 5*
ft 031 i t2 3 TO ^-
งTO (5 4J rH
CO St 10 >rt Q) Q)
CO CO H ฃ 0
4J TO 0 TO 3 I 4J
S rt fi ^ rH ' -rl 03
ซ o o o < m •*-
VO
CO V4
rH 1 -rl
>M TO
0) 4->
> c
O 0
0 U
f1>
w
04 0
0>
O 0 TO
CO O rl
•* SH cu
3 >
O 0
en a
0
(t 0
c
MH -H
O 2
(0 <4_|
4J 0
10
f3 CO
U -H
0 CO
rl >,
O rH
fc TO
CU r<
q
•ri 0)
t-J rH
•H
0 <4-l
CO O
TO ^
04 ft

4J 4J
)H M
TT a a
in 00
vO K K

f~- -P -U
O vw \u
O TO TO
MM
H Q Q
•M ^
0 0
4J 4J
^r 3D
in 4J 4J
VO -H -H
> 4J 4J
r* tn (fl
0 G C
O H M
rH 43 JZ
U O
M M
TO TO
0 0
tn co
0 0
a; a:

4J 4J
to en
0 0
1 $
•rH -H
rH S ฃ
(Tj
4J
H i-H CN

-------
                           C
                           •H
                            V

                           U
                         CO
                       4J -
                       co  3
                       >1 -p
                       tn  PQ

                       a)  c
                       rH  O
                                                          IT)

                                                          O
                                                          CN
                                                             CN
                                                             ^
                                                             CM
                                                                 O>
                                                                 oo
                                                                 r-i
CM
                                                                                                                            Page  1-7
                                                                                                                    tn
                                                                                                                    cu
                                                                                                                              4-

                                                                                                                               (0
CM
r~*

3
           o  c

           CU  ITS

           C  C

           .28
OS  Q

CU  -P
O  H-l
M  O
3  W
O

    C
4-1  ซ5
           CO  0)
           Cn  0
           c  pa
            id
               0)
                     O
                     03
                     CTl
            >l 10
            Cn 3
            lH  0)
            c  os
            c





^^
•O to
Q) -
I 3
3 -P
m CQ
c
0 C
U O
•rH
>ซ rH
tj> H
M -H
0) W
C -P
W v"
0)


(TJ -P
rH C M
r-l M >i
< 3 W
•P
0)
ซ


ci
in
CN)







TJ
O
-p e
U 0)
0) -P
•n 01
0 >•
k tn
&,



T
in




 cu  N  tn

•H  ฐ ~3
 3  C •*-*
 6" O CQ
 4)  'H
OS  M  C
    rH  O
 >l -H -H
 0)  V4
 C  Q>
W  O-i
                                                                                                               CTl
                                                                                                               in
                                                                                                               rv
                                                                         CN
                                                                         rH
                                                                          ^

•H N
rH O
O
Q C
O
0) -H
Cn rH
 ~
0)

0)
rH
ra cu
rH C -P
rH H tfi
< 3 >i
4J cn
cu
OS

0
00
^
VO
o
^3*
^
rH


•o
CD
4J g
U CD
CU 4->
•t-l CO
0 >i
>H W
CU



n
t*^
vO
^
LO
C^
CN
                                                                          ro
                                                                          in
                                                                          in
                                                                          CO
                                                                          CO
                                                                             CG
                                                                             V '
                                                                             c>
                                                                                                  m
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                       CN
                                                     cu
                                                     rH
                                                  ซ,'  :-'
                                                                              0)
                                                                             i-H
                                                                             4*
                                                                             4J

                                                                          >. ra
                                                                          
ป.
^D
o
^
rH








'M
C
b
U
cu
OS

0)
CJ
M
3
O
(fl
CD
K

H-t
o
to
4J
to
(tS
o
CD
O
Pu
a
c
•H
^ 1

01
O
jrj
fO
4J
a
Q)
OS
4J
M-l
(0
^*4
Q

CQ
C
H
j2
O
(0


-------
1-8


























,-,
CO
14
CU
c
•H
$
a
1 O
ง u
r< CU
cn en
O <0
rH >H
04 0)
G CU
o ซ
••H
-P Cn
O C
3 -H
*O "O — -
CU 3 0
Pi rH CO
ro U cn
0) X H
SO H
H "— ซl
93
O 0) rH
EH CO rH r-
10 cn

2*3
c 5;
-H
> Cn
(0 C
10 -H
cn
>! 10
S.X
M U
cu l ^
Cn 0)
r4 -
m 3
c 5
H co a
Cn
rH C C
(0 -^ O
•^ > -H
-P (0 rH
C (A rH
(C ^4,
•P V4
o 3
0- ซ—
o
o
CO ro
cn r-
rH in





CO
rH
r- r-
cn vo
r-ป CN


4->
C CO
cu <->
g CO
cu
V4 3
•H C 4J
pom
& ฃ
3 KG
V It]
>i 04 CO
tT 3
M O
0) ฃ
C tJ
W >-





^r
o
o
CO
o
T







rH
(0
•H — >
r4 10
cu G
Potential Mat
Savings
(thousand to

O ro
CO T
cn o
.rH ป
T
rH
rH ro
O vO
on in
rH -
VO


CO
m o ป>)
01 rH ^
rH CU CQ
4, l\
(0 rH 43

C <0 t5
5 ^ ซ
-H .H rrj
•P Oi to
O4 <0 3
| 0 0
cn rH ii
C cu -^
q 04
u
ro
O •ป
CD O
cn
rH m
CN




r-
rH ro
f- rH
o> ••
rH rH
CN


งa
. Consumpti
iusand tons
r-1 O
5*
o —
vO
O CO
CO O
cn
rH cn
ro
O
rH O
r> r-
cn
rH f-
CN
CN
co in
in in
EH 01 ซ•
rH VD
rH
r-
ซ
•r-
V
ซ
4.
1
{
-r
(
1
J
(
C

i
i
i
I
J rJ
: ซ
H O4
7 ft
0 PU
ฃ
J
0
Vi
O
•
VD
rH
"*-*




^*.
01
•
ro
CN









vD
in
CN
in
rH








CN
in
O
rH
*h^
m
vo
;n
rH
***'

0
VO
vO
r>




in
vo
•*!•
vO


co
o
VO
vD
O
O
cn
*k
'ป
ro
VO
O
in





0)
r-
rH
o



LT!

V0
in
^ .-




^-^
CO
•
vt;
^r
"








o
cn
in
Oi
fN








rH
i-H
01
i-H
?
CO
in
^
rH
*-^

o%
r~-
O
*
CO




cn
rH
CO
vo"


co
VD
rH
vO
in
ro
CN
m
0
'ป
ro
in





rH
:iป
fl

'



CO
"
o
r-






f,
•
r-
rH









CN
ro
vo
vo
C!
rH







O
VO
ro
CO
CO


r-~
•*
rH




••a1
CN
rH



rป
o
in
CN
rH
OJ
r^
en





>-.'
ij
_
1
--!
<



O3 rH
• •
rH ro
OD in
rH f^





in in
• •
r-~ CN
CO CN
ro








O
o
o
VD
CO








0 O
in cn
0 •V
m vo
rH
O j IN
rol ro
-31 cn
CN in


r~ vo
in co
m -cr
rH
*r




o m
t- rH
^ o
fe
in
ro


rป vo
O r-
vo cn
in t-
m
o r-
o t
01 cn
CN O
•ซ?;
CO
vD O
ro CN
"52*
r^
CN


to
u
Hy-1
4J rH
TO 10
ซ -P
rH O
a> E-I





















t
•*r
t~-
CT>
p i
gf
"4
O4
w
•h
•
(0

C3
^
g
•H
+J
O
0
•8
ar.^ Source Ri
'>(
vi
e Recover
o
j_i
3
O
to
ฃ
ง
to
m
cu
rH
Cn
cง
o
V
4J
rH
a
5)
K
•O
c
o
o

W >
U-l rO O
O Q) M
V4 Cn
CU U
C" C a)
(0 -H
-P l>i
C tJ A
CU G
u  ,Q O rH
n) c ,g
rv; o -H (3
u HJ H
i 3
04 *O J3 T)
cu i
co e M c
in 3 o O
cn co (ซ-i G
i— i co
(0 T) C
4-> CU -H
C 01 S
cu -H o cu
rH rH W
(0 Cn rH (0
> C ifl O
-H -H k
3 &> W U
cr1  fl)
4J -H -H 4J
rH (0
C T3 H
M CU 1-1
3 CO O fl)
-P 3 J3
a) co -P
H rH T3 —
It) rH
Ifl -H (TJ M
rH -O O
cn cu c -P
4) -P nS O
g (8 -P ซd
2 g co m
w
CO
<
^•"s.

co
3
t}
G
M
Ul
rH
(C
Basic Materi
X
•rH
W
M
fi
O
•H
4J
04

CO
c
o
U
>1
Cn
M
M
. 
g
rH
ซt-l
•a
cu
-H
M •
o c/i
•C r-i
fl)
W 3
•H VM
Q) T3
D i:
rH CO
ซS rtl
> ฃ
U
>• rH
Cn 3
rH O(
fl)
C G
0) O
M
CO M-J
•H
ฃ +J
-P 0
'4-i
0 -
*> 9
0 O
;i
rH
Q) rH
-P ซ
•H 0)
X -P
S 1
a
ง

•^r
























-
















































-------
                                                                   Page  1-9
                     vO
     •H  a      ,
     M —I    ซ*K|
0)
              e
tn
tn
in








s
!'
!
to
?
i
|













CX-H
+ ซ U H
?S S *
* 5
• H*
52
8
r

fc

• I"
gsซ
C •-< M
Ia|
•S^*
gl
l^f
|8o
wjjfi

ป
^li
1 9^
• 9 O
•*JU,3
gป^


av ฃ
jf ^^



•u
n
o
•H
H
H
s
^^
B~
S o
p o
S.O
n *-ป
^^
a
5
n
ง
H
^

-------
Page  I-10
m  a
o  o
i-j  -H
S  r-l
                                                                      in
                                                                      <*i
                                                                      r-




























in
„
9
E-i








































rH
ซ
1 •*
ง*>
C D>
&S.S
O O rH
M 0. O
CM >i
C U
ง ฐ2
•H 0
•p m u
O 3 ซ-H
P ซ ซ
•O K ft
0 M
K M 0
ซ -P
3SS
3 3 n
o c o
Savings of S
f Beverage Co
gy Savings fr
ฃ O M
O* 0
M 4J C
0 U H
W O)
H



















^f
^^
fltt
..
 O
*ป Z O -H
ซtf U rH
S '"j
3



ro O o
r^ o in
CN f) 00
rH rH






ซ_i
r^
rH fl$ €*l
งซ M M
M 0 0
O 0 -P >
fli Sซ Or
K ปQ


o m o
m vo in



งm
UJ
c
rH 0 0 Q
a •*} ฃ M *J
•H 0 *J 4J
M > „ W C
0 Q B O
4J B O 0 -H
4 S M -P rH
ae ซ ซM i E
S < W •=

0
1 1 O
in
CN



CQ
&J ซM4
M F" 1
•d 0 —
0 B a
W -H C
D <0 C
4J +J
a c  i—
*ป <0 •ป•
<0 M ฃ
•g a) •ฃ
>
V
ซ


moo
'S' O O
in o CN
CN VO

S
r.
c
-H rH W
i ^ m •,
9 0 id \
rH 4J r-l \
*S, M O







1 •

f"i
0\
rH
<
W
^
•
CO
0) D*
CN
". G
rr, O
•H
+J
U
•o


0
u
3
1 -0
ง

M1
0
8
0
6.245
on Resource R

01
a
G
O
o u
s. s
01 JJ
a
s

*o
g
o
0
0
m "

r-
• ^"*
oo d




rH


O
f
.
0)
•H
U)
^H|
I-l
<0
s

M
0
C
•H
JS
d
S

*
M
w

4J
V<
a

K

ซM
2
Q
0

5
•H
4J
01
C
H
est Research
2
•o
-H
s
c
o
based
0)
•H
n
i-i
(0
p*
i^

^


ซ^
r>i











^M
o

^i
u
c
•H
U
•H
IM
IM
0
^i
0
^
O
u
0
M
a
0

01
0
•P
W
Rt
3
a*
o

0
OP 3
 rH
•H 10
O -
0 *ป
M 0
•O
rH rH
9 0
O V
in
00
6 **
4J 0
10 r^
U) CO
to
0 On
8 ..
S^3
H 8
(0 0
D4-P
•H 01
U >i
••H CO
I


^•N









3
•P
sa

c
o
•H
3
•H
^
-P

CN

01
en
-5
(Q
CO
tP

S
0
0
rj
4J

ง
0
r-i

10
01
•H
rillion Btu's
Detainers .
•p u

n ป
^ 1
o 0
"M A
rn
O tT1
H C
• = -H
(Q CO
•H >i 3
0) CT> 0
>i MM
rH (D

C Q) O
< M
W ซH
1 1


^*ป ^-^
** in










-------
                               TABLE 6                                  T  ,,
                                                                  Page  I-11
             Energy Savings of Source Reduction Program-
         Impact of Reduced Packaging Consumption on Potential
                 Recovery of Energy from Solid Waste
                                   PajMjjฃ        Plastics        Total

Potential Materials Savings
  from Reduced Packaging
  Consumption (million tons)         6.6           2.4            9.0

less:  Portion not entering
  the waste stream  (million
  tons)                              2.02           .4            2.4

Net amount of materials not
  available to the total
  waste stream                       4.6           2.0            6.6

less:  28 percent, the
  waste generated outside
  of SMSA's4                         1.3            .6            1.9

Met amount of materials not
  available to the SMSA
  waste stream4                      3.3           1.4            4.7

Btu's per ton of combustible
  material  (million Btu's)5         14.A          24.0

Btu's not available to
  energy recovery systems
   (trillion Btu's)                  48.8          33.6           82.46
 (1)  From Table 3.
 (2)  It was estimated that 30 percent of the paper does not enter the
        municipal waste stream because of recycling and diversions into
        other waste streams  (water, industrial waste, scrap, etc.).

 (3)  It was estimated that 15 percent of the plastics does not enter the
        municipal waste stream for the reasons stated in Note 2, above.

 (4)  In the estimates of energy recoverable from solid waste, it was
        assumed that energy recovery is feasible only in SMSA's
         (Standard Metropolitx- Statistical Areas), where economies of
        scale can be realised.

 (5)  Assuming paper at 7,400 Btu's p<2r pound and plastic at 12,000 Btu's
        per pound.

 (6)  This energy "loss" of 37,.  trillion Btu's is smaller than the energy
        savings (322.5 trillion Btu's) from reduced packaging consumption.

-------
Page  1-12
                                                                            rซj
                                                                                            in
                                              ro  0)

                                              oS
                                                  o
                                              •H
                                                  i




Q)
Cn
2
M
41
> ซ
gSg
•H ซ -i-l
Reduct
Rr-usabl
Conta
?.
^
%i ri|
O
(0
•
bป
M
m
w
fi
                                                                                             IQ
                                                                                             H
                                                                                             
                                                                                             4J

-------
                            APPENDIX II

         METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY
                POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE FROM WASTE
                         by  Robert A. Lowe

Theoretical Energy Potential
     The amount of energy that could theoretically have been recovered
from all the residential and commercial solid waste generated in the
U.S. in 1971 is estimated to be 1.1 quadrillion (1.1 X 1015) Btu'l
(British Thermal Units) (Table 2 in the text).  This is simply a func-
tion of (1) the total U.S. population in 1970  (207.0 million); (2) the
average amount of residential and commercial solid waste generated
(3.32 pounds per person per day, or 125 million tons per year for
the entire  country); and (3) the energy content of residential and
commercial  solid waste  (4500 Btu per pound).
     By 1980, the amount of energy theoretically recoverable from waste
1s' proJectetPtb be 1.4  quadrillion Btu's.  The increase over 197Vis the
result of  the projected growth in population and the projected growth
in the amount of waste  generated per person.   The population growth
rate reflects the 1970  Series E projections  (an Increase of 9.3  per-
cent between 1970 and 1980) of the Bureau of Census, U.S. Department
of Commerce.  The projected per capita waste generation rate for 1980
 (an average of  3.91  pounds  p*>r person  per day) reflects an annual
increase of about 1  percent.

-------
                                 II-2
     All of the basic assumptions—waste generation rate,  energy
content of waste, population projections and conversion factor to
barrels of oil—and why they were selected will  be discussed below.

Available Energy Potential
     The estimates of the energy potentially recoverable from the
residential and commercial wastes generated In Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's) were made in the same way as those above,
with one exception.  It was assumed that the average person in an
SMSA generates more waste than his rural counterpart.  Accordingly,
for 1971 a waste generation rate of 3.60 pound:; per person per day
(4.33 1n 1980) was applied to the SMSA population of 140.9 million
persons (152.6 million 1n 1980).

Projected Implementations of Energy Recovery Systems by 1980
     This 1s a projection of energy recovery systems that could be
operating by 1980.  Unlike the two preceding categories, however,
this projection was not made as a function of population; nor was
1t made solely on the basis of residential and commercial solid
waste.  Most of  the cities and counties  included as Projected  Imple-
mentations  (Table 3 in the text) are communities that  have  taken some
definite steps toward Implementing an energy recovery  system.   For
example, a  few have already begun construction; several others  are
soliciting  proposals from builders and  system developers; and  1n
other  communities, the legislative body  has voted to implement a

-------
                                  II-3
system.  Several of the communities on the 11st have not taken such
definite steps, but they were 1ncU"1ed because they have an active
planning effort directed towards the energy recovery option.
     A brief description of what 1s taking place in each community
listed in Table 3 1s included in Exhibit 1.  This information was
supplied by state and local government officials, representatives of
electric utilities and other private companies, and staff of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
     It is likely that there will be more energy recovery systems
operating by 1980 than Table 3 Indicates.  This is because there is
enough time between the  present  and 1980 to begin and complete  the
three to foir year Implementation process, Including planning, design,
construction and shakedown.
Potential Candidates:  Areas Where Local Conditions Favor
     Energy Recovery
     The list of Potential Candidates (Table 4 in the text) identifies
those areas (SMSA's) where certain local conditions in 1974 'favor
implementation of an energy recovery system by 1980.
     As in the first two categories, the energy recoverable from poten-
tial candidate areas is a function of population.  Being based on the
entire population of each area, the projections assume that all the
residential and commercial waste generated in each area would be in-
cluded in energy recovery systems.  It may happen that these communities

-------
                                 II-4
may chose to put only part—or even none—of their wastes through an
energy recovery system.  On the other hand, some communities may recover
energy from other wastes (such as tires, waste oil and wood chips)
that are not Included in the residential and commercial waste categories.
Nevertheless, all the residential and commercial wastes (and only
those wastes) were used as the basis for the projections in order to
provide a reasonable "maximum possible" estimate.
     The potential candidates were Identified using three local
conditions as screening criteria:
          1.  Markets
          2.  Economics
          3.  Public Interest
To be considered a Potential Candidate, an area must have, as a mini-
mum, suitable markets to take advantage of existing technology.  As
a second but critical consideration, an area must have certain economic
conditions, such as high disposal costs and high alternative fuel costs.
Thirdly, the public must be interested 1n energy recovery.  In certain
cases, public Interest 1s so keen that public officials have been
encouraged to implement energy recovery even though economic conditions
 may  not warrant  it.  These criteria were applied in tuan to each of the
 243  SMSA's ranked by population by the Bureau of Census.  (Exhibit 2).
 Markets.  SMSA's were first screened to determine if suitable markets
 for  waste-based energy are available within a reasonable distance.

-------
                                  II-5
The best market approach was assumed to be the use of solid waste as
a supplementary fuel in existing electric utility boilers.  Use of
waste as a fuel for heating downtown areas (district heating) and for
industrial boilers is also possible; but data on the location and
capacity of these boilers are too limited to screen SMSA's on the
basis of these markets.  Therefore, each area was examined only for
the location of electric utility power plants that are potentially
capable of burning solid waste as a fuel.  Any utility boiler that
was designed to burn coal was considered to be potentially capable
of handling solid waste because of its ash handling capability.  And
if a coal-burning utility boiler were not located in or near an SMSA,
that SMSA was excluded from consideration.
     Certain exceptions were made.  The San Diego SMSA has no ash-
handling  boilers  nearby but was  Included  because it is Implementing
     ,*
an  EPA-supported  oil pyrolysis demonstration  plant; San Diego County
is  planning  to utilize pyrolysis on a  larger  scale if the demonstra-
tion  is successful.  Miami  and Jacksonville,  Florida, are faced with a
critical  shortage of disposal space because of  a high water  table and
population density;  this  primarily economic condition is  expected to
force  these areas to attempt  to  find markets  for waste-based energy
even  though no suitable  utility  boilers  are available.  San  Antonio is
 included because  Its municipally-owned utility  is  seriously  considering
building a new coal-and-wastj-burning  power  plant.   Eugene,  Oregon  (in
Lane  County) is included because **e  County  is  considering  retrofitting

-------
                                  II-6
its boilers to supplement decreasing supplies of its primary fuel,
wood wastes.

Economics.  The second screening was made on the basis of three econ-
omic criteria:
          1.  Population size
          2.  Alternative disposal costs
          3.  Alternative fuel costs
     Energy recovery systems require large quantities of waste (at
least 200 to 250 tons per day) delivered for processing at one site
in order to achieve economies of scale.  To gem.rate 200 tons per day,
a population of about 100,000 persons is typically required  (assuming
each person generates 3.60 pounds per day and the plant operates five
days a week).  All but 26 SMSA's nซve a population over 100,000.
     Alternative disposal costs ire frequently  the most important
economic  factor.  The most common influence on  disposal costs  is  the
availability of land nearby.  Many communities, especially  in  the
cities and  suburbs, have land that is undeveloped but not available
for disposal because of local resident opposition, high property
values or adverse physical conditions (e.g., high water table).  These
communities must seek disposal sites farther away and, consequently,
 ^There will  be exceptions  to  this somewhat arbitrary minimum size
 requirement.  Ames,  Iowa,  (population 40,000) for example, 1s about
 to  begin  construction  on a 200  ton  per day energy recovery system.

-------
                                  II-7
bear the additional transportation costs.
     Most of the SMSA's listed as potential candidates were found to
be approaching the limit of present disposal site capacity and having
difficulty in obtaining additional capacity.  This is a particularly
critical problem in the densely populated Northeast.  By comparison,
cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles appear to have found long
term disposal capacity in relatively nearby canyons.
     As alternative fuel costs increase, the economics of energy
recovery become more favorable because the value of the waste-based
energy is usually measured by the value of the fuel that it replaces.
High fuel costs, however, have only minor significance in decisions
to implement energy recovery because of the small potential impact on
the economics of the fuel user, especially the electric utility.
Nevertheless, It became apparent that most SMSA's that qualified as
Potential Candidates had higher fuel costs than non-candidates.  Again,
this is especially true In the densely populated Northeast, where the
more expensive fuels (low sulfur coal and oil) are required to meet
stricter environmental standards.
Public Interest.  Public Interest 1n energy recovery has become an
Increasingly Important influence on the public decision-making process,
especially as public officials have become more sensitive to environmental
and energy Issues.  In correnunltles where public officials are considering
energy recovery as an option based on their perception of its economic,

-------
                                 11-8
environmental and political benefits, these public officials appear
to have, as a minimum, the tacit support of their constituents.  In
some communities where conditions do not readily favor energy recovery
(for example, sufficient land disposal capacity is. available), the
public's Interest 1n environmental issues is so strong that public
officials are planning to implement (or are now Implementing) energy
recovery systems anyway.  This strong public support for envlronemental
issues is evident in several states, including Colorado, Connecticut
and Oregon.
      These three screening criteria were applied  to each  SMSA.   In
 evaluating each SMSA as a  possible Potential  Candidate, certain  factors
 were more important than others.   Exhibit 3 Indicates the .criteria
 that determined the judgment about each SMSA.
 Waste Generation Rates
      The following per capita waste generation rates were used in the
 calculations of recoverable energy:
                                      Pounds per person per da
                                      WT
 U.S.  National  Average                3.25                 3.91
 Urbanized Area Average               3.60                 4.33
 These rates were based upon the estimated 125 million tons of solid
 waste generated 1n the U.S. in 1971.  The types of waste included in
 this  estimate were described ',;, **ie text.

-------
                                  II-9
Heating Value of Waste
     The higher heating value of 4,500 Btu per pound (9 million Btu
per ton) is generally accepted as the energy value of "as received,"
unprocessed waste as delivered by a collection truck to a processino
or disposal facility.
     Different waste processing methods have different recovery effi-
ciencies.  For example, a shredding/air classification waste process-
ing system loses some potential energy by removing heavy combustibles
from the fuel fraction, while high temperature incineration with no
prior classification would lose far less potential energy.  However,
no adjustment was made to allow for such processing losses or energy
conversion efficiencies (of, say, steam to electricity) because no
prejudgment can be made as to which energy recovery method would be
used in any given situation.
Population Projections
     Series E Projections, indicating a 9.3 percent increase between
1970 and 1980, were used to project the population of the U.S.  in 1980.
The same projections were applied to all  SMSA's,  although it is likely
that some SMSA's will grow more than others.
     Series E Projections are one of the several  population projections
made by the Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce based upon
projected birth, death, imnigration and emigration rates.  Series E
was selected because it is the best approximation of current rates
of birth, death, and so n.

-------
                                  11-10
Barrels of 011 Per Day
     Energy data are frequently reduced to a common term of measure-
ment to facilitate comparability.  British Thermal Units (Btu's) and
Barrels per Day of Oil Equivalent (B/DOE) are the most common.  B/DOE
were calculated based on the following factors:
          1 barrel of crude oil ป 5.8 million Btu's
                         1 year ป 365 days

-------
                                EXHIBIT I

       Projected Implementations of Energy Recovery Systems  by 1980
     Location

California

   San Diego County
Tons Per Day
Description
     200    Pyrolysls; U.S. EPA is sponsoring pro-
            ject to demonstrate the Garrett Research
            and Development system; oil produced
            will be accepted by San Diego Gas and
            Electric; project in engineering design
            phase
Connecticut

   Bridgeport
   1,200    Solid waste as fuel; State-wide resource
            recovery authority is reviewing pro-
            posals; Northeast Utilities will accept
            the fuel
District of Columbia
    1,000    Solid waste as fuel; D.C., Fairfax
            County, Arlington County, the City of
            Alexandria, and the Council of Govern-
            ments are studying the feasibility of
            implementing a supplemental fuel system
            on a region-wide basis; Virginia Electric
            Power Company and Potomac Electric Power
            Company are cooperating in the studies
 Illinois

    Chicago
    Chicago area
       excluding  the
       City
    2,000     Solid waste  as  fuel;  construction  started
             in  early March;  Commonwealth  Edison will
             accept  the fuel

    "I,POO     Solid waste  as  fuel;  several  suburbs  have
             approached Commonwealth  Edison  to  deter-
             mine the feasibility  of  implementing
             jypplemental  fuel  systems

-------
Iowa

   Ames
                        200    Solid waste as fuel; construction to
                               begin by June, 1974; municipal electric
                               utility will accept the fuel
Mary!and

   Baltimore
   Montgomery County
                      1,000    Pyrolysis; U.S. EPA is sponsoring pro-
                               ject to demonstrate the Monsanto system;
                               pyrolysis gas will be combusted on-site
                               to generate steam for sale to Baltimore
                               Gas and Electric; plant will be opera-
                               tional in early 1975

                      1,200    Solid waste as fuel; County is planning
                               project with Potomac Electric Power
                               Company cooperation; feasibility study
                               has been completed; County Council and
                               County Executive have approved the plan
Massachusetts

   Bralntree
    East  Bridgewater
       (near Brockton)
    Sauqus
gus
(near Boston)
    Lawrence
  240    Water wall  incineration;  plant has  been
         operating since 1972;  Contract signed
         early 1974 for sale of steam to Weymouth
         Art Leather,  Co.

1,200    Solid waste as fuel; Combustion Equip-
         ment Associates and others; privately
         financed processing facility; Weyer-
         hauser is accepting the fuel for their
         industrial  steam boilers

1,200    Water wall  incineration;  plant under
         construction; steam product will be
         sold to General Electric Co. for pro-
         cess steam

1,000    Solid waste as fuel; Lawrence will  be
         the first implementation under the
         State-wide solid waste master plan
         approved in early 1974; master plan
         calls for supplemental fuel production
         for steam and steam-electric boilers,
         and materials recovery

-------
Missouri

   St. Louis
8,000    Solid waste as fuel; Union Electric
         Company plans to implement, by mid-
         1977, a system to handle the residential,
         commercial and selected industrial waste
         from the entire metropolitan area; U.E.
         will process raw waste, recover magnetic
         metal, aluminum, and glass as well as fuel
         for their boilers
New Jersey

   Essex County
       (Newark area)
   Hackensack
      Meadow!ands
   Union County
       (Elizabeth),  or
       Middlesex  County
       (New Brunswick)
1,000    Solid waste as fuel; Request For Pro-
         posals is being prepared; supplemental
         fuel to be accepted by Public Services
         Gas and Electric or other industrial
         steam boilers

2,000    Solid waste as fuel; detailed proposals
         are currently being reviewed; it is
         anticipated that the fuel will be
         accepted by Public Services Gas and
         Electric or industrial steam boilers

1,000    Solid waste as fuel; feasibility cf
         producing a supplemental fuel for
         Public Services Gas and Electric is
         being assessed
 New York

    Albany area
  500
    Hempstead
    Monroe County
       (Rochester)
1,000
         Solid waste as fuel; feasibility of
         producing supplemental fuel for indus-
         trial steam boilers, state-owned heat-
         ing plant, and municipal electric
         utility  is being assessed

         Detailed proposals  have been  received
         for design and construction of energy
         and materials recovery systems

         Solid waste as fuel; feasibility study
         to produce a supplemental  fuel for
         Rochester Gas and  Electric completed;
         Request  For Proposals being prepared

-------
   New York City
   Westchester County
      (White Plains)
2,000    Solid waste as fuel; City has completed
         feasibility study of using City waste
         as supplemental fuel in Commonwealth
         Edison's boilers; City writing Request
         For Proposals to design and construct
         supplemental fuel facility; City and
         Commonwealth Edison also plan to init-
         iate contract in Spring 1974 to deter-
         mine feasibility of designing new
         steam-electric boiler to burn 50% solid
         waste

1,500    Feasibility study for solid waste
         disposal completed; County most inter-
         ested in energy recovery for County-
         owned industrial park
Ohio

   Akron
   Cleveland
1,000    Water wall incineration; detailed
         engineering study 1s underway; steam
         product will be used for downtown heat
         and air conditioning and for B.F. Good-
         rich process steam

  500    City has requested and received bids
         for a steam generation system; the
         super-heated steam product will be
         used for electric generation by the
         municipal utility
Oregon
   Lane Countv
      (Eugene;
  700    Solid waste as fuel; feasibility study
         completed to use waste as supplemental
         fuel in a Eugene municipal steam power
         plant that currently burns wood waste;
         additional waste fuel is required be-
         cause wood wastes are becoming scarce
Pennsylvania

   Philadelphia
2,400    Solid waste as fuel; Combustion Equip-
         ment Associates has announced plans to
         construct and operate, with private
         financing, a facility to produce supple-
         mental fuel for industrial steam boilers

-------
Puerto Rico

   San Juan
1,000    San Ouan planning to initiate feasi-
         bility study for a solid waste as fuel
         system; supplemental fuel would be used
         by Commonwealth-owned San Ouan steam-
         electric station
Tennessee

   Knoxvllle
   Memphis
   Nashville
  500    Pyrolysls; Tennessee Valley Authority
         1s studying the feasibility of Imple-
         menting a Torrax gas pyrolysls system
         to produce gas as supplemental fuel
         for an adjacent TVA steam-electric
         boiler

  500    Solid waste as fuel; detailed proposals
         have been requested to implement a wet
         processing system to produce supple-
         mental fuel for a Tennessee Valley
         Authority steatn-electric boiler

  750    Water wall Incineration; construction
         1s complete; public authority has been
         formed to construct and operate the
         facility; steam product will be used
         for downtown heating and air condition-
         Ing

-------
                                                   Exhibit  2
Rank of Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the  United  States by Population:  1970
       Rank
          18
           to
          •-5:
                  York, X.V	  11,M1.B91;
               Ollf	
              CV.capo,  111	
              FMltdelphl., Pl.-V.J.
                         7,03Z,07S|
                         6,978,"47j

                         4,ซIT,?14
               •troll, Nlch	   4,199,931
               an Francisco-Oakland,
                                        3,109,
               Ollt	
               '••hlnffton, D.C.-tfd.-va..    2,861,123
              Soปtoa,  UM>	    2,753,700
              nttlburfti,  P.	    2,401,943
                  Loulซ, Me.-ltl	    2.363,017
                iltlaor*, Md	    2,070,670
              Clซvซlซnd,  Ohio	    2,064,194
              Bouaton, Tax	    1,965,031
              (Mark, H.J	    1,ซ56,55ป

               UIMaaolla-St. Paul,
               Him	    1,*13,ซ47
              Dallaa, Tซx	    1,655,950
              6a*ttlซ-Bv*r*tt,
                                         1,421,ซ69
               erora, Call*	   1,420,366
              •ilnukaa,  Wli	   1,*O3,4*ป
              Atlanta, Ga.
                                         l.SM.Ul
               *J	   1,3M,7B4
              •an 01.6ฐ, call*	   ป,ซ7,<
              •Otfalo, ซ.T	   1,349,211
              matt, Ma	   1,ซ*T,T"

                                         1,1*3,tl6
                                         1,ซ7,&29
                            -Unnllto-
               Ontarlo, Calls	   1,M3,14<
               UdtaMjaU*. tod	   1,109,682
               <<• MM, Calif	   1,064,714
                 iTrtck, t.I
                 ibmttr, K.T..
               Ian  Aotoalo, Tax
               Sartan, Ohio....
               Uwlnlll., Igr.-Ud.
                      i to, Oallf...
               Itort Worth, Tkx.
               BinlBlhaa, Ala.
                H.K	
               Tblado, Ohlo-moh.
               Akron,  Ohio.
               Dartlord, On
"•'-ป—  Cltr, Okla.
an i j-rai.n   II T
OyrviM^v, nซ*•>•••••
PUT ^•Illllt Tt"
 QUoalo, lad	
               Honolulu,  Baxll.

               fort Lauซ*nialซ-
                fcllTซx>d, Flซ..
                      Cltjr, f.J.
                       Kith Itolnt, K.C.
               •kit tete City, Utah
                     m, P..-H.J.
               Oa.ll., Hebr.-lo..	
               Grand bpldl.  Web	
               YMna*town-*arrซn, Ohio.
               SrriMCtieia-Ctilcopfe-
                       , Haas.-Conn....
                       '111ซ,  Flป	
                            910,781
                            ซ2,6e-
                            •<4,01<
6OO,S92
770,120

762,086
739,274

121,910
692,571
680,600
679,239
663,691

640,669
ซ3*,iO7

633,367
                                           629,176
                            620,100
                            609,26e

                            603,895
                            557,635
                             543,551 I
                             Ml,10f i
                             540,14^ j
                             539,225 I v
                             53S,OO3 j
                                            ฃ>28,8$5
                                      i
Rank

06













81



85
87


91
92

M
95
96
97






105







114

117
118

121
12
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
jj
13
134
13

13
In
il.-'..J -Md.












rail *
Davenport -Rock Island-



Vest I-ปlm Bซach, Fla 	
WUkซป-Bซrrซ— Hatleton, Pa.


Bak?rcliซld, Calif 	
Uttle Rock-North Uttle


Bttu-mont-Port Arthur, Ite.
Albuquvrque, N. Hซx 	
Otattanooca, Tซnn.-Cซ...,






Newport Smra-Haaiptoo, Va.







Apple tofl-0shko*h, VI*....

Duluth-Superior, Mlnn.-
Santa Barbara, Calif 	



Hunt ington -Ash land,

SaHnes-ftonterey, Calif..

Columbus, Ga. -Ala. .......
Colorado Springs, Colo...


lAvrence-HaverM 1 1 ,



Hsni llan-ซiddletซป-.r., Oiio
S*EJnt.w, Mich 	 	
PwJj'-'l ,

<0*J,-J'M ,

4VK 00^
413 053


409 370
400 337
3R9 352
389 153
376 423
376 690

372 210
362 638
359 291

i
351,667
348,753
344 320
342, 301
341 979
340,670
329 MO
329,162
323,296
322 880
319,693
315,943
315,774
304,927
303,968
303,849
302,672
299 502
296,382
295 516
294,703
292,159
29O, 272
290,208
287,487
286 101
285,167
284,632
280,455
280,031
276,891
273,388
272 063
265 35O
264,324
263,654
262,622
258,906


253,460
250,071
243 075
238,584
235,972
234 1O3
232,775
232,415
229 515
228 453

226,207
219,743

-------
Rank
  139
  iซr>
  141
  142
   144
   145
   146
   14ป
   149
   190
   151
   IU
   IU
   1M
   1*5
   UT
1ง9

MO
lซ
ua
1*3
1*4
   1M
   I*T
   i<
   i
   1TO
   in
   ITS
   iป.
   1TI
    SMSA's	

     utcne, Oraf......
     0ซell, *ปsซ	
    Fซr*tteviiiซ, N.C.
    Vatcrbury, Coon —
   17*
   IT*
   1*0
    II!
    1M
    IV
    1M
     !ซv londoB-Groton-
     Xonrleh, Conn	
    Stafford, Conn	
    Nacon, C>	
    Santa Roaa, Calif..
     Hodcito, Calif.
          i, H.C....
     Brockton, Itoca.
            , Ca...
        AUMtle City, • J.
        Uaซ, Ckte..
           :!ซ•, •!•.
                        City,
         Oblo-ซ. Va.
                          IU ----
     Oadar toปM*, la
     ซprljซfl*ld. 111
     tart tkitti, *n
     OMM Bay, ฅ1ป
                         i ซ•!ซ*ซ,
        HartajtUM, Okie.
      •prinxfialo, Ho.
      >*• >*4ra
                   , MM*. -ft. i —
      Lake Cfcarlaa, Lซ.
      *ซr Britain, Com
      *afcซTlllซ, i.e...
      Ajaarlllo, Tปป	
      Jacknon, aUet....
       Bralto, TK	
      Aadnnoa,  Ind	
      Piuปซ..Oinป,  Btab.
      ป1
Population

 213,358
 212,860
 212,042
 208,B56
 2O8,41>
 2O6,'
 20t,342
 2O4,ซซ5

 101,650
 nn,ซ5
 1*4,106
 1*0,3ซ8
 119,820
 187,767
 1W,*U
 182,712

 lปl, 535
 181,436
  175,143
  178,041

  174,:
  171,47ป
         Waurlo*,  lซw>.
  1*1,6X7
  U3,a*l
  183,213
  1<1,33ป
  1*0,431
  1U,144

  167,418
  1*7,115
  15$,112
  152,929
  162,642
  149,916
  147,453
  143,415
  14S,2*9
  146,0ปซ
  144,3*8
  143.174
   141,(25

   140,368
   138,451
   137,776
   135,356
   134,58:
   132,911
   129,99
'Rank

191
192
103
194
195
196
197
198
199
900
901
202
309,
904
905
106
907
900
9O9
no
211
912
219
214
215
210
217
216
919
230
921
222
229
294
225
296
227
32ft
229
3SO
93
232
233
234
235
2ป6
23
230
X39
24
241
242
M3

1970
SMSA's

Petersburg-Colonial
Wichita Falls, Tซ 	


Vlneland-MUlvlU*-

rtrto-Moorh**), N. D*k.-




Sloux City, loM-Nvbr....




I*fซyซtt*-ซMt teZajwtt*,




&lotmiiซtoBปNonMa, 1H-.

Mtvhbinf-UaKiMterplMi.









0fcvnua-t)*oi*on, Tax.....






Uwlซtซ&~Auburtป, IUiM...
KซAi)Ma, K.H 	


BrrปD-Collซซซ 0t*tiซa,7%x.


Populalion
t

127,621
126 27$


121 374


120,099
118 230
117 917

116,169
115 387

112 230
109 716
1O9 370
100 401
100 144
107,219
104 764
104,309
101 190
97,3 ซ
07 O96


91 0Oป





04 104
09,225
SO 611




72 059
72,474
00 450

65 433
57,978


-------
  o  4
                                    r~
                          5   5   oS
                        3
                        O

                        in
                        r>
                        O
                        I
                        o
                        01
                        jr
                                    i
                                    L
                                    A


                                    l/>


                                    O

                                    5

                                    OB


                                    O
r*"^
0 0
3 3
a.—
•  e
  3
32.
a. n
flj r^


S&
wi •-•

-, _,
O TO
n) 3


S^
O fil
O rป

A ?

Q3
      3 -O

      S3^

      3 A
      re o
      -ป t*
      If
      ?1
      ?i
                  o

                  Ul
                                                      m    vi
      I   "
      ป   -ซ3

      S   i.

    **-   i
                                                    S  e   M
                                                    F  *,   s
                                                    E  *   3

                                                    3  8   |
                                                    m  rป   fi
                                                        ^    **•  -*
                                                        O    1-1  r*
                                                             c  ป   5,

                                                             g  *  I
* o
•3 3
-*. 0
O C
3 1
•o to
35
I-
^3
ore
< re
          3
          O
          -5
                  I/I
                  3
                  i.
                            re o
                      A
                    rป en
                    3-O
                    A C
                                        ฃ
                                    I  ฅ
                                    A   —•
                                    O   P

-------
      V) W
      c-
         o> u

         o
               o

               •o
                  co
                  O>

                  (U
          oป

          0)
                  ซO
                   o>
XI     C
 3  O>  9)     S-
D.  O  >  ซ/> *
    S.  O>  C E
    3     O
  .  OX> H- 4.
 o> ซ/>  d) •*-> o
 c    C  O>  O XI
(/) ^— ^O  O IO
                  i-     C
                  t-     O
                        xt

                         ex

                         o>
                        -ป->
                         
                              o
                              a
                              a
                              o
                                      (U
                                      >
                                      O
                                      u
                             -ป->
                             O>
                  9)
                  O



                  O
             co     c
            T-     O
                                              Vt
                                              C  >>
                                              O  
    U    4->

    3^X-
 O  oฃ- 4J
f-  co  *g
 E  O>  J-  c
 O  W  Q>  O
 C     C T-
 O  i-  O> +•>
 o  o cB    i    JQ c  •
                     4->  a. ai    
                           J3   4->i- -M
                     •O  trt          ** i-
                      C f- 4) C J- T- W
                      m    r- o 
                                              o
                                              s-
                                              3
                                              O
                                       • i—     O"O
       c o
 
U_ O S- i-
 Ol  IO  IO 4J  IO  ฃX i _        _
 >  OO r—  IO  jE  CL VI    E O
 •r-Ot-r—     OO    OO
 wt  cx 10  3x:     CL    c
 C    O. Oปf— CO    O O
 Q> ซf—  (Q  o *r—  IO ••—    O *r~
 CX^3     CXXZ  O T3    QJ E
 X    +->       T-          O
 at  i-  oซ*-   ••*•> 2    i— c
     o  c  o  >,i- S    .o o
; Oซ4-       *J •— C    CO
i o     >ซ> aป t-  c       t- a*

:     c xi  3  c           s- ai

>•<—r—X>O*OO4->    3EI t—
                                               3  >ป
                                              -O  t-
                                               c  
                                               u  o
                                                  O
                                               a>  a>
                                              xป  s-
    I

 O  (U
•ป->  c
*f>*  ^^
"O O

 o
 o   •

 u&
•r-  (U

 O  O
 C  O
 o  a>
 o  u
 0)

 o  o
r—  i.
XI  3
 IO  O
                                                c
                                                (0   •
                                                —i—
                                                   IO
                                               4->  I/J
                                                (O  O
                                               x:  a.
                                                                    ซ/) "O

                                                                    <0 i-
                                                                    0) O
                                                                    CO tt)
                                                              og,^^
                                                              C Or- >
                                                                    IO IO
o
u
                                                                                    O)
                                                                                 a>
s
 o

c-s

 1.5
 0)  C
x:  10

 ฐ"
 C  IO
 IO •*"
x: -M
4J  C
    a>
4-> 4J
 c  o
 10 a.
•M
 i-  10
 o
 o. 
 E  10
          O)  •   I— r—
          C  , 10
      f-  to f-   4J o


      f-     >   r— O> flj
      4-> XT  IO   T- C t—
       3  tfป       +J i- XI
       o  100)1    3^


      i- x:  10
       *- -M    "   n- IO IO
      •Mi-  >,    J- JC >
       O  JR-P   4->    10
                         •a
                         c
                         IO
                         in
                         <
                                a>

                               jQ
                                1C

                            tt
                            f- IO
                            r— >
                            f- IO
                            •4-1
                             3 4->.
                                O
                             O
                                      01
                                      O>
                                     t/>
                                      CO
                                     +J
                                CSS
                                a>
                            •M  u
                            o  10
                            at
 O)  S- *r-
    O)Xป
  • •—  id
 vtt-  a.     •
 o>  o   at i. x:
                          .u
                          a.
                          
                   C t-
                   O> VI
                   t-  O)
                   V> "O

                   en  o
                   10 4->


                   t-  o
                   O f-
                   4->  en
                   O 1-
                   ซo  o
                   ซ*-  O)
                      •o
                   co

-------
                                                                      a>
                                                                      4-1
                                                                      >n
                                                                      XI It)
                                                                      •ป- JC
         >>
         ss
         I/I
0.1-    C
   4->    O
vt 
eป r
ง



         Wr-

         ** &•
                  a.
                         'ง
                                                                         to
                                                                         L.
                          TJ O
                          ซ1-
                          Ol *->
                          Vt IO
                             4->
                          C C
                          ง*

                         .SB-
                                   •— o
                                   ~8
 e    *•> o>
 •    ซ
ซ    e
                                    0.
                                    a.
                             4J     10  Ol
                              O       X)
                              o>     vt •*-
                             OL.

                              Si
                                                                      O)
                                                                c
                                                                10
                                   (71
                                   C    C JO
                                   •r-    -r- S-
                                   t—    U QTI
                                   U    O>
                                   >>    XI ซt
                                   C?    -r-2
                                   4>    I/I LU
                                   i-    C
                                                                 0)
                                                                •
                                                                       O -C
                                                                         4-ป
                                                              c  u
                                                              r>  c
                                                              o  3
                                                             gJ3  O  C
                                                             r-  O  O
                                                        CL    10    T-
                                                        O.   W  C 4->
                                                        ID     Ol f-  IO
                                                                      •o  a>  ut
                                                                             C
                                                                                                 VI
                                                                                                 C
Xt       T-

•?       "i,
 ซ       5"
 >>      oi
                                                        O)
                                                       4J    x "I 5>
                                                        "O    4^,0X1
 O.T-    ^ซ
   4J     t.
i—  IO     O>
f 4->    XI
 O  C    •ฃ

    ซ     M

4^g     ง
                                                                                        g"S    4^

                                                                                        rซ    ง
                                                                                            ft,    o
                                                                                                 O
                                                                      if-    *
                                                                      !*•    r

6
  fit
                                                          I     l-i
      t.    4J O   3t
 X    W    C *.         ซC
 at    >    10 d     •   ซ3
h-    LU    tO      LU
       I     I C   LU     ป
  •    01    E 01   m   <
 in    r-    -S-p   rD   H-
 ซj    4J    oi t   ซ=c   a;
r-    t>    je ซ   3c   <
                                          
-------
O>

I
               •P    O
               V)  f-  I
               it- E  J-
               E.    o  o
                                  0)
               C O> U H-
               •*- > O>  C
                  O
                            v-  O> C
               i—  fc.     i- ซr-
               XI     C  Id 0>
                3  O>  O)     i-
               O.  O  >  ซ/> Id
                 •  o-o t- v-
                O> ซ/ป O> +•> O
                C  0) $~ t-
                O  i- 1-TJ Q)
                i-     40  Cr-
                   c (u  o xi
                         
                                   O
                                   O
                                   35
                                   o
                                  •P 0)
                              O   (/ป >
                              t~   0) O
                              i—   J- O
                              xj    S-
                              C   C 3
                              t-   O O
                              E   S- J O.
                            Id
                                            10  O
X
LU
ฃ
o
LU
LU
VI
u
          o
          u
         Cid    r-Oa)U)
      •ซ-V)ld    v-    r— Xt •r- 4J O i
      Eidid4JiBa.
      oฃ.a>oc>ซoi—  id^o.
      C    C i- t- f-  O T- r—    O
      o s- a> -P     v)  CLIO  3 x:
      OOtflldr—  C  CO  >  Q. CTr—
      ft)S_    (JซU-r-ซOOi-       -r-
      r— o>ปc:-r-aiwo*ซ-  -4J
      XI-ป-i..^4->     OCO >>T-
      IO -P O>     COM-       .-' i—
      i-T->CO)O     >>OปT~O
      O"OOld>4->"Or—  t/l (/) D.
      > C U     C     CXI  3 ฃ=
      RS O 4) 9/1  O  (/)  *w  (O  (O 4) >•
      U-Ot--ป-UT-t— Xl  O T3 O
                                                  S
                                                  ซ/)
                                                  o
                                                  &
                                                  I/)
                                                        o
                                              T- V>
                                              T3 C
                                               C O
                                               Of-
                                               U
U

3
O
                                               U
                                              t- C
                                               E O
                                               o u

                                               O t)
                                               OT-
                                               0) E
                                                  O
                                              f— C
                                               id o
                                               c u
                                              T- 0)
                                               o>
                                               J- 0)
                                               id x:
                                                          52!
 01
 >
•r*
 U   •
 =3  >ป
•U  (.

 งฃ
 U  O
    u
 0>  01
 c  $-
 O  O*  V)
•P  C t-
•r-  O)
•n tDxป
 c     c
 o     id   •
 O   .1— ซ—
    >>     x:  CL
    O 4->  
 CO    -r-
 ~     w-o

       id
          o oi
          u t-
          0)
                                                                           O)  O)  O
                                                                       O)  p  Eซซ-
                                                                           o^
                                                                           MX: xi
    i-
XI 3

 2
 O 4)  -P id



 C O  r- >
=)<*-  Id Id
                                                                                          o  •
                                                                                          •P 0)
                                                                                          U -P
                                                                                          Id Id
                                                                                          t- -o
                                                                                           t-

                   C  ซ id
                            •p  u
                •r- Id f-
                i— x: id
                •r-    >
                •P JC. id
                3 M
                   id 0>
                U    i-
                i- x:
                S- 44
                •Pt- >,
                o 3t -P
                0>    n^
                r— Iflr—
                ซ*-•ป-
                   ซUXI
                 • r— Id
                VtfQ.
                01 O id
                >• X) O
          (A
          4->
          01

          If
                            i—  O> QJ
                            •r-  C i~
                            4J T- XI
                             3 f— US
                               TJ r—
                             U  C t-
                            •t—  id co
                             J- x: >
                            •P     iซ
                             o x:
                             Cซ  v> -Pi
                            r~  It, O1
                             V     Cj

                              ซ 4-> Ol
                             0-r- 5L
                            ar
                                      ai
                                     •—    ซu

                                      id o> co
                                 I  >>r- -O
                               •O -P i- id
                                c t- id E  •

                               x: "-r- id v> 4J
                                 !  4J    Id C
                               x: 3 4J x: a*
                                
                                   T"    GO O)
                                   4- qi ^ g
                                 . *J i- co r—    0) 4->
                                   c -e- +* x: x
                                *ป -r- O 3 -P O?
                                                                                             CO
                                                                                fi
                                                                                 id  o>
                                                                                 u -P
                                                                                i-  id
                                                                                 C 1-
                                                                                 O> V)
                                                                                t-  0)
                                                                                 W) "O

                                                                                 in  o
                                                                                 w  o
                                                                                 O T-
                                                                                •P  M
                                                                                 OT-
                                                                                 n>  U
                                                                                M-  0)
                                                                                   •o
                                                                                 to

-------



















i
c
1
I
c












4
!
i
<
V
li
r
o
Si
i!
r
u <
V> L
.
'



4
1
;
t



^*
=i
A
ซ

&
u>
J?
• U*
41 •
o"S
Or—
41 r™ป
ซฃ
•2"c
<8  jO
i,.

""x
c c
•j: ฐ
C •ป—
C -4->
ID U
r-  ซ Z < X
i
\
.


ป
1 3 X => => = =>

J
LJ
5!
III
^1 ^P ^fc ^ป ^_ ••ป ^P
a
•o
g Ti
<0 V.
ซfcX Qj •
1 > ' "O
ซ -r-S- C
O Cฃ 1- •-!<*- ซB
3E Ir- T- _l
• O IO " •—
tC. *oci^mio *
g s> ,j r: -r- o g
C ** O T3 * ป~ C
75 ••- o ซ o o - ซ
O C *r- CL Ol 41
M DC 41 ซ C O 11
ซ ui co *> •ป rป o
in ;> c •ป-
c ae co t> c ic
5UJ W C 10 4)
a 10 •— ui z
xl ซo rป oo ?•:_>-
el (si 
c
">,
•s
3
4->
41
JP-




X V) JC < 0





Z Z 3 Z U.



•
IB
r—
U.
?• 1—
z uj
3 tO i2
? S E
S- 1 f-
 Ul N S ซ
4i E2 t- i a.
CX. 0 I- O 1
^ Ul
• * * 
*O CD ,ฃT ^3 ftj
t— SI o. o o.
CM CO *fr Ift ซC
CO fO CO CO M













,
E
s
4->
(A

M
cn
c
•r-
'3
>j

O
^_


S
OL.
1


<





U.







>-
z
*
ce
Ul
ROCHEST
p.

i
a
O
o
ซ
•ซ
"5
Ja
O
4->

O> -
C 41
•r- *J
c in
C 10
•0 ป

Q.T9

W)r-
•r- O
I/I
$2
J^S
-^- c
*J a
3 JC

X) O
OJ ซJ
S k
O 41
1 r—
^S
10
•2-"S
u s.
"EC
at


<





u.







•
X
Ul
1—
*
o
t—t
s

s






































ซt l/> ซt





IE Z X





•
Q
ac •
ฃ <*-
• r™
>• ID
o S "
•T" * *
•C '•' O
0 d 1
• (-ซ 41
g > 1
>> 2 o
o _j to
3 S 5
L

-------
               •M     O
                VI  Vl-r;  I
                Oli- E I-
                t.     o o
                   in

                   ฃ
                     o ซ*-
i-  >  0)  C

 U  U**-    *IO    O
.,_  ซu^-  o>  C    •ป-
r—  J-     ฃ. -r-    r-
 j**     C  IO  O)    J*>
 3  41    ซ/ป  ซO    OL
    S-  0>  C  E
    3     O        0)
  .  O Tป T-  i-    4->
 Oft ซ/l  0) 4J  O    IO
 C  0)  UT-        3
    Ei- t-t>  o>    cr
       I/I  C i—    O>
+*  c  at  o x>    x)
                                         O>

                                         aป
                                         CX
                                         IO
                                    ai

                                    o
                                    o
                                    a
                                    o
                                    v> J-
                                   4J 
                                     
                   O    4->
                   S- >ปIC
                   3 r— XZ
                   Or- *J

                      J- C
                      o> o
             C 4->  I
             O (O
    O OJ ซJ
          U
  C
   -o o ic
    c u
    o tt) in
    a C -r-
4-> 4->  O. 0)
 10       X>
 i- -o  m
 41  C *r- 
 u  a>  10 10

T-1-  O^
    ซ/)  Q. IO
r-  C   >
 IO  Oln- IO
 C  Q.-O
 OX    4-ป
•r-  0)  V. O
•M     O C
 C  Oซ*-
 ,
 > -MTSi—
 C     C X)
 O  I/I   i- 4->
      +J i-
C i- i-  ซl
O r-  v>
O T-  IOl-
       OtJ
if-   --4-J i
 O  >ซ  v> CL ซo
 3  C
 
 VI
 c  >ป
 o  ia

i:Ea,

xlSii
 C  O  3
 O f-  O
 U -M  VI

 O-5  t-

loo
 O  O  +J
 c
 O  U  0)
 O T-  >

 *  0*0  •
r-  C  3 >>
 IO  Ot3 i-
 C  O  C   o >
 O>    U O
 i-  
 >  i-

ฃ,-
 c.  o
 IO  O
JC  CX
•ซ->  VI
   •^
 wo

 Si.

 i^

 vi  a>
•r- r—

•M  IO
                                                                    i—  >
                                                                     IO  IO
                             ฃฃป
                             >^O IO
 +* C r—
 i- IO f-
 r— X: IO
 f-    >
 *> x: 10

    10 
 f— x: 10
                o  2 4-)
                01    T-
                r—  Vปi—
                0)  1- t-
                    O) XI
                 or—  i- a.
                o>  o • xj o
                   o x>
                   xป , 10
                   +? o

                   r— Ol O)
                   •r- C r—
                   4J i- XS
                   3 r—  IO
                      •O r-
                   O C t-
                   f- ซJ  IO
                   s- x:  >
                   4->     IO
                   o x:
                   ซ &n -Pi
                   p— r'  o!
               -J-J  0)
              o i-  i.
             z  2  10
       a>
      r—

      •8

4^^:
 C T-  10
 
X:T-  10
 I 4J
x:  3 4J
 VI     O
ซt  o  c
                         a>
                         a>
                      at co
                      xป
                      IO
                      E   •
                         VI
                      VI +->
                      (O C
                            r ซฃ
    s-  a>
    •M  i-
 C  O  IO
 o  a>
f- r—  I/I
•p  a>  J-
 o.    a>
 ai  o>i—
 u  c-r-
 x  —  o
'44 r- X>
                                      O>
                      CO  <0


                      VI  S-
                      T-  IO


                      4^  J-   •
                          0) 4J
                      4J XC K
                      3 4J 0)
                      XS  O 43
          IO
                                                                                          cu
                                                                                 in

                                                                                 o  •
                                                                                 4-> OJ
                                                                                 O 4J
                                                                                 IO IO
                                                                                 i- -o

                                                                                 t- -5
                                                                                 v c
                                                                                 JC <0


                                                                                    "
                                                  IO T-
                                                 x: ••-%
                                                 •M C
                                                                           c c
                                                                           IO O.
                                                                           •4->
                                                                           S- 10
                                                                           o
                                                                              tin
                                                                              ซo
                                                                           •r-

                                                                           O) CO
                                                                                           10  
                                                                                           C i-
                                                                                           Cn M
                                                                                          •r-  
                                                                                 S- O
                                                                                 O T-
                                                                                 4-> VI
                                                                                 
-------
                                                o
                                                0>
                                                01

                                                c



                                                3
                                                i.
                                                en

                                                e
                                                a.

                      •o
                       O)
                       u
                       O)
                       $
                      to
                                          >>
                                          01


                                          -g

                                          i
I
                                                ซ/>    z   z    ar:
                                                                                       ซc   ซ
                                                      a   3
                                                                               U.       U.   SS
                 >•    >•
                                     >-    >-
                                                                                        >-   >-
      ec
                        I
                       >-
                 i    I
            Ul
            z:  •
 •    •    ui>-
J=    E    a:  •
<->    ซ    u z
fc.    JC    W1
o    o>     •   •
at    c    $~>-


f    ^    ^^
&.    c    02 i—
o    -^    _j
u,    m    
                                                                                               1
                                                                    z    *
                                                                          o
                                                                          C
                                                                          o
                                                                          I  ซ    >o

                                                                         i-IZ    ac
                                                                                  oc
                                                                                  Ul
                                                                                  •"3
                                                                                                 c

                                                                                                 o
                                                                                              o
                                                                                                       
ซซ•ซ*•   ^    <*
                                           o   •—    co
                                           in   in    vn
                                                                          ro
                                                                          in

-------
V) I/It-  I
o)f- e ป-
ฃ    oo

C O> O ซป-
                                  a*
                                  aป
                               ai
                               a>
                             
                             O
                             a.
                             o
                             ol
                O  Oซซ-
                              O>     i-
      n.  o  >  ซ/>  vi  oi  •*•* o
       C  0)  i-  T-
       O  V- T-TJ O)
       U     ซ/>  Cr—
      +•>  C  0)  O43
      to I-TJ  o  O>
                         O   l/> >
                        T-   O> O
                        i—   i- O


                         o.  c
                             •f— O)
                        r-      O
                         <0   CO S-
                         C   C 3
                        i-   O O
                         E   C in
                         O   +J Ol
                        2    fc-
 U
•t—
r—
43
                                        3E  O
CO
 X
UJ
    O) •ป->
    U
    ป-  >>
    3 t— .
 O  O r— .

1  S3  ฃ
 O  S-  Ol
 c     c<
 O  U  Ol
 o pco
                            C
                            O
                            (O
                 O. Ol
                     43
               •O VI
                Ct- 0)

                  ป— 43
                O) ซ tO
                                           43  C   •
                                           
                               ซn Q. ซ
                               C ซ/ป >
                               ttปt- 10
                ซ +* at
                fc.t- >
                O"O O
                > c u
                
                u. o C •
             01

             o
             u
Suov

o^C<

S-Or^l
   C 43
I/I *
         O 01  M
         t- 4->  Or-
         •4J lO  Q. to
         IO 2  O. V>
         •—     O  O
         3 JC     Q.
         O- Olr-  VI
         O T"  (0 ซrป
         0.4=  U-D
   4Ji— C
 In- O
 ) V) l^i- 10


                                                        V)
                                                        C  >>
                                                        O  10
                                               C  O  =>
                                               Of-  O
                                               O 4->  ซ/>
                                                 i-  aป
                                               O TJ  l-
                                              n-  C
                                               E  O  O
                                               O  04J

                                               QUO)
                                               Of-  >
                                               ป
                                               (0  OTJ  U
                                               C  U  C  0>
                                              i-  tt)  O  >
                                               CD    U  O
                                               J-  01     O
                                               10 4=         Ol O
                                                              C  i-
                                                              O  0)  
                                                             •<-ป  Ct-
                                                             f-  0>
                              O    10  •
                              O  .r- r-
                                 >,    10
                              O i- 4-> VI
                              i- Ol ซO O

                              O O 4-> CO
                              CO    f-
                              O OJg-0

                              Ol    <0 k.
                                       o
                                 O> Oj
                              01 O E1
                                                        ป-i-
                                                       ซt-  t- t— '(O
                                                        C  Or—  >
                                                              (O  rO
          ง
          U
                                                                                Ol

                                                                                4J

                                                                                c
o   •
+i  0)
O 4J
IO  IO
••-•0

J--5
Ol  C
JC  ro

ฐ"
c*ซ
ซe i-

5^

^3
c  o
fO D.
4J
t.  ^s
                ^Cr-    ^,(0
                   O 43
                   43  
                a>    t-
                •—  tfป r—
                0ป  J-T-
                    a>43
                 • r- ซO
                V> i- O.
                aป  o ซ
                >- 43 O
                   •—  o>  t-43
                    3 i—  ซ0
                      •O r—
                    O  C t-
                   •t—  
                   •M     IO
                    O JC   ,
                    ai  vt -Ml
                   r—   ซ/>

                         TJ *J f-  ซO
                         CT- (O  E   •
                         ซO r— >     M
                         4C t- IO  VI +J
                          I 4->      T-  03
                         •M 01 *-jC

                         (U O>r—     Q) 4J
                         U Ci- 4-> 4C X
                         X f- O  3 •ซ-> O)
                         Utf rป- J2I 43  O 4J
                                                                                ฃi
          Ol
          JMC
                                                                            ' 

                                                                             (A

                                                                          r^S
                                                                          •ป-> +J

                                                                          10 Ol
                                                                          O 4-ป

                                                                          cs
                                                                          i- CO
                                                                          C T-
                                                                          Oป VI
                                                                          T- O)
                                                                          ซTJ

                                                                          CO O
                                                                          <0 •!-ป


                                                                          t- O
                                                                          OT-
                                                                          +J in
                                                                          Oi-
                                                                          
-------
            Si

1
4
I





!
3
3





i i
1 *
IJ i
ฅ
5
ฃ
CL
1
5
*j
"tl *" UJ
t
, ^
SHSA
Allentown-Bethleha
Easton, Pa.-M.J.
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON,
1
i/i
$
"!ป
1
>,
I
U
I

ac a a :a u
^ >>>>>• b
e
ฃ il
"S E ซf*f ซ
••• * U • _
1 * fc SS c
* * 1 2^ "
i i i Si |
jc gf H <•- o i
r - a ^*ป ?
5 ? ? , --s S
g fi S kx i
^^ •>->•
^
••3
Richnond. Va.
WILMINGTON. Da.-N,
Flint. Mich.
ป
M
ง
i
jjซป
t
5
|
0.
$

=> JC =>=>=> =1 3E
as x x x >•>-ป-


•
* * 9C
• <• o 2
• Ifc. . ^ • Ul
m f JR x |-
ซ f— •— VI •
S "• 3 ป ? ซ J
o o" - - 2 5 d
ซ i 8 1 42 2 5
m ซ yi 8 u v x
ซ— r— 4) U U ig O
a i. v. 
o    t—    CM   ro
r^    r~    r~   r-.

-------
                g,.
  u
11-   I
          o


 C  O)  O <*-
T-  >  Q> C  •
    O     3r-
 O  O<*-    10

r^  *.""" 2. T-

 3  0)  0>    1.
o.  o  > w  C  Qป  O.Q
                CO-t-^O  O 10
                                  *->
                                   en
                                   O)
3
O.



5
IO

cr
O)
 

                                                 S
                               en
                               c
                               O
                               5-
                               -M
                              oo
                             i-
                             3
                             O
                             Wl
                             aป
                             V-
                CO
 o
H-

Q
          O
          u
          LU
          0)
          J*



          I
0 0
€ OJ

ซfc
OIS-
o> c
r- O
jQv-
ฃฃ
o-o
> c
•0 O
it y


la
t^B




Ol
c
"T™
^^
^> ฃJJ
•r-  JC
•^1 (/)
ft)
O
T 5
ols

p"ป (A
a> s-
a>
Vt T-
0) O
>- jQ



^ป
f
4J
•M
r— 4->
IO
i- C
0) O
ss
u
• •5
^k C
w ••••
tt>
> c
o ซo
CO 4/1








1 •
ai

"ซ
^•B
•r-

IO

oil
(-1
>,
+J

r^
ซr—
J3
<0
Q.
IO
U




1nerat1on
j
c
r_
1C
o
•r-
4->
C
0)
>
o
u






2!
Ol

•r-
0
.a
>,
+j
•r-
|HiH
•fw
4->
3

U
•t—
+J
U
0)

e*
•n
o
z



^
4->
IO
Q)
>
to
at
a.
X
^

o
o
-M
42






^
•r-
r*ป
•r**
A
IO
Q.
IO
U

CM
C

r~
•a
c

ซ3

J**
">
•y*
3E




2 ,
ซ-l 4J
(/)
•fl>> ^^
r~
r— .Q
 >
55
•M
&. O

>,
C JD
ซJ (O
r— .a














•
a>
Pซ
J3
ID
r-*
IO
>
ia

+J|
o!
— f
a>
t.
IO




A
ai
IO
c J-
O 0)
*J IO
ซ *
a. 01
O-r-
<*- •
O ^^
aป^
3 C
IO O
OTJ











1 >i
T> •ป•?
C t-
ซO r—
ฃ •ซ-
1 •*->
J= 3
m

C U
o a*
•fw fซ
+j aป
o.
82
ar




o
+J
•r-
O
O,
O.

(O
u
+•*
1*^
"o

s_
o








ai

^a


x:
•ซ->
o




C i-
i/i o a> ซ/>
C >> 4J Ci-
O IO ซr-  c c
T- (/> O O IO •
•o c J- o .r- ป—
C O 3 >> 10
O f- O U i_ 4J ซ/l
U 4-> V) f- (U IO O
i-  JC O.
U T? C O O 4-> M
T- C C O T-
E o o o ai vt x>
S O 4-> O C C?
%/ %ป ^** %* *•• b*
C V ซ 4-
O O 0) 01 QJ O
O i- > 0) U E **-
0) El- r- U
O O • XI 3 VI tt>
r-C3>ป IOOt-r-
IO O *O 1> 1-  > fc- r—
O> U O IO >>T-
i- O) U S- (. r— IO
at jc 
IE:ป—X)&. rs ซ*-  ^J
















ป




•
4J
X
5




JC
4->
c
o

10
ซt-
&-
ai

^J
o
c
ia
5
4->
c
10
_!_ %
**
o
i1
9f*
ai
c

s

^
+J
c
IO
u

71
•T"
c
o>
T-
ซ/)

in
IO


1_
o
4J
u
10
M-

V)

•
o;
10
•o
•t—
•o
IO

r_
ซ
•r—
•M
c
3
o
a.
IO

M
IO


O)
+J

•r-
(/)
•8

o
+J

c
o
•rป
tf>
T"
u
0)
•o


-------
in
*j
                                              =9      a
                                                                   =>   x   =>
                                                                                                     =>    x
                                                                                                     >•    >-
                                   0
                                  O
H   5
ฃ    "
 -    s>
     UJ
•ป-    
                      •O    O
                                   ฃ

                                   1
                                   Gt
                                  a

                                  g
                                 o
                                  0
                                 •r-


                                 O
                                              o  o
                                             oei-i
                                               i

                                              J-  Ol
                                              O  C
                                         O    C.-
c
IB

                                                       IB
                                                       O.
                     UNO)

                      .   t    "


                     2   *    *
                     <    c    <2
                                                                         ^
                                                                                 o     *
                                                                                                      U   .*
                                                                                                     f    t-
                                                                                                     -ปJ    O
                                                                                                                  IO
                                                                                                                  CO
jxl   in    10
 C|   l-x    !>.
      •-       C\J
      00       00
                                                                          in
                                                                          oo
                                                                         to
                                                                         oo
                                                                                                           O    i-
                                                                                                           en    o>

-------
                V) t/> i—   I
                ait- e  s.
                fc.    O  O
                Ol >s C  >
                •M i- O  <0
                C O> O ซt-
                T- > 0)  C  •
                   O     3r-
                U U<*-     10
                    ฃ
                          O)   O
                          S-   Q.
                          o>   a
                          4->   O
XI

a.
          to

          oป

          c
       C 10 01
       Qj    W
       > to  Irt  QJ +-> O
 c  at  1.1-
 O  J- i- -O tt)
 t.     trt Cป—
4->  C  O) O X)
CO t- T> O IO
                                    3
                                    o.
                               M S-
                               .|H> (X)
                               ซ/ป
                                   f-    f    t-
                    3    C   C 3
                    o-    t-   o o
                    a>    E   s- to
                   "O    O   +•* OJ
                   ซs:    z   co i-
                CO
         O.
                    0)
                    u
                    O r—
                    (A   IO
I  i- -O ซ/>
I  0>  Ct-
                                       O)
                              
          U
          O
          U
 O  W Ol '
 u  o o
 0)<*~


4iง^:
XJ-ซ- S- •
 IO  4J 01
 i-T- >
 O  T3 O
 >  C U
 10  o a>
u.  o ซ- •
 U  0) IO
 c:  > to
-r--r- O
     o.
•—CM
 IO  <1)1-
 C  Q.T3
 O  X
i-  a> v.
4->     O
 c  oซซ-
 a>  o
 >  +JTJ
 c     c
 O  co 10
 O  T-r—
                       
                       i—  O    O r-
                       ซ 4->  
                       ซr- r—     O O
                       (O  3 JC     Q.
                       >  OL ODi—  S
                       c  o  >ปt- a>
                             4-> •— C
                       >ป O) t-  O
                       i—  Vt  V>  Q. - O
                       jQ  O "O  O 4-ป
                                          C  >>
                                          O       a>
                                          i-  ซ/>  O
                                          •o  c  s-
                                          C  O  3
                                          OT-  O
                                          O •ป->  10
                                             T-  a*
                                          o -o  i-

                                          1ง0
                                          o  o  **
                                          c
                                          o  o  a>
                                          O-r-  >

                                              0*0  .
                                          •—  C  3 >>
                                          ซ  OT3 S-
                                          C  O  C 01
                                          T-  a>  o >
                                          en    u o
                                          s-  ai     u
                                          (o .C  aป a>
                                                                          c  J-
                                                                          O  d)  IO
                                                                          4->  Ci-
                                                                          f-  >      ซn
                                            •r- ai re  o
                                                ง> .C  a.
                                                o ••->  ซn
                                             CO    t-
                                             o ai M*O
                                             u s- c
                                             a*     JZ JQ
                                             o a> -M   i-    f—
                                             ป-r-
                                            ซ*- i- i— •  <0
                                             C Or-  >
                                                   10  IO
                                                                                              O)
                                                                                             x:
                                                                  to

                                                                  O
                                                                  4->
                                                                  U
                                                                  
•t- 10 ซr-
•— x;  10
T-     >
•ป-> x:  10
 3 (A
 o a +j
 0)    n-
 r- M r—
 O) i- T-
    0) XJ
  • i—  (O
 tO t-  Q.
 OJ O  10
 >- JQ  U
                              t- 4->
                              O) i-
                              O XI
                             JO IO
                                 CL.
r—  cn o>
•r-  Cr-
*J-^Xป
 3 i— IO
   TJi—
 O  C -r-
1-  lO IO
 S- X: >
•4->     IO
 u x:
 Ol  (/>•)->
•—  10 O
 
                                 XI     O>
                                 lO Ol CO
              •O -M t-
               C t- ซ
               IO •— >
              x: t- *
                i  •*->
              x: 3+J
               w>  .  o
              cฃ O C
                  •r-
                  i- 0)
                • •Ml.
               C O IO
               O 0)
              •>- r— ซ/ป
              4-> 0) J-
                     O)
                  O>
                  CT-

                 i^5
                                    IO
                                    E   •
                                        to
                                    VI 4J
                                    IO  C
                                        O)
                                        cn
                                    />  i—
                                              CT- +J
                          $-   .
                          O) -M
                          x: x
                       3 -t-> Q)
                       xi o i>
           V)

           0)

           s-
           IO
                                                                  C *
                                                                  
                                                                  4-> C
                                                                     0)
                                                                  •M +J
                                                                  c o
                                                                  IO O.
                                                                  4->
                                                                  S- IO
                                                                  o
                                                                  Q. I/)
                                                                  E <0
                                                                  •ป-

                                                                  Ol CO

                                                                  Q CO

                                                                     I/)
                                                                                              IO  Ol
                                                                                              O 4->
                                                                                              i-  10
                                                                                              <*-  C
                                                                                              •i-  O>
                                                                                              C •ซ-
                                                                                              cn 
                                                                                              i-  
                                                                              O f-
                                                                              +J  to
                                                                              O T-
                                                                              (O  U
                                                                              
-------
M
                                                                              IO
                                                                              cn
                                                                              2
                                                                              I
                                                                              ซ
                                                                                            S       •ฃ
                                                                                            I       1
                                                                                                      V
                                                                                                      o.
                                                                                                     8



i- Ol
o vi
o
Or- Ol
T- O JC

C i~
O Ol •
U X Ol


wo
TJ f C
Oli- 10
N O

ซ*ป
u vi J>
to- c
L. ซr  V>
Q<*- *ฐ
Iฐ55
* 8
JCCO C

$s *
oeni-
r-r- OT
OIJQ U
J*
C >ป O
10 C*j
l_ oi
> JC
vi o cn
- U 3

CO Ol
U *->
Ol S- 0 .
JC 3 C
*-> o
VI VI
H- Ol IO
St. <4-
O i —
.

10
2
01
1
3
*
O 01

4J O
IO i.
i- O.
Ol O.
o. 10

C 4->
sง
91 Ol
C !ป
JC
bO





41











X






>•
t- e
•r- fO
U S.
10 cn
•
cn O.
•r- qn
f— C
O i-

o o.
Ol ^>>

*ปฃ
ฃ*
- >-
csi

a

c
•X3 •

^ C
3 10
jQf-
CL
VI
t- C
O
*ป••-
•o *->
•r- IO

10 vi
0 C
ง1
1"ฐ






<










*






J.
V)
c
o
+J
IO
c


fป
o.
c
ป— t
u
OJ

?
a.
s;
CO






CO










u.






>•
VI
c:
o

10
c
Ol
f,
r—
O.
ฃ

T)
01
U
01

1
0.
SI
CO






ซ*










X






*
>•








1
!
I

i











\


















zj










•
y^
OCUJ
at
t3
_J






C^l
CO

•
to
Columbia






CO
0*


j*
Lancaste






^^
on

g
u • ง
1 1 z"
5 ซ ^
o o> ซt
i cr o
*-> 1- O
I II
10 ja  ^O ^^
O* >•"> W

•
z*
Trenton,






GO
CO

O
co
o
Chariest






O^
o>

ฃ
>^
z
o
Binghamt






^3
o
*"
•— 3 JQ 10
Ol O -D
•O f vi ซr-
•t-TJ
•O 4-> J= C
Ol 10 +J 10
wS+J0
1- 3i—
r— ซ*• jCl IO
wen ซ4J
- r- VI C
cC +J Ol
CO C Ol *->
X i- •* O
CO I. O.
VI IO
Oi e E o
JC O M
o-o 
55 *j S-
o. vi i ซx
OJ Ol CO
o i- •— z:
X O*  cn
OIT- c c
jc 01 •'-
+J 0 -!-> S
T- O O
JCr- CLr—

•^3OO
at o. *->•ซ-
CO
Jf
*ป
^3
to






^D
O
r—
-J
ป*4
ROCKFORO






to

*~~
J
i
UI
1
Ul
u
z
Ul
!






CO,
ro
r—
ซc
*
E
CHARLEST






^^
CO
*~
O

A
Ul
Ul
1






o\
CO
r~

ป
BROCKTON






y<~
in
*~

-------
          at
          ง
          c
4->     O
ซ/)ซ/) 1—  I
> C >
+j  i- o  o •+-
•ป-  > 
3   ซ/ป  10
    i-  ซ/> a> •ป•>  o
c    C 0) O J3
OO  t-TJ O  10
CO
ai

(1)
4J
c
                                     o
 ni
 3
 cr
                                           -u
                                           CO
                                            O)
                                            3
                                            a.
                               CO
                               o
                               a.
                               a
                               o

                               CO
            CO >
            a> o
            s- u
            a> a>

            c
                          9—       O
                           ro    cn J-
                           c:    c  3
                          T-    O  O
                           ฃ    s-  to
                           O   -4->       c 4->  i         a>
                       •r-     O  IO O        i—
                       J=    i- JC i-  I     J3  C   •
                     d> 4->    4-> 4-> QL   
                     1_  >, (fl  S- -O to           +Jv
                     Sr-XZOJC-r-OCl-'i-trt
                 O  Oป— +J  C  *    •—  OttJW)
                 •r-ซ/)id    T-     i— JQ f- 4->  O f—
 C
 o
        (/>t—  Q. OSi—
                                                   cxi/)
                                                   OO
                                                      a.
                                                      W)
                                                            c
                                                            O
                        O
                        O
                           >>
                           "3


                           tO
                           C
                           O
                                                   O
                                                   J-
                                                   3
                                                   O
                                                   W)
                                                   ttป
                                                   *-
                                            C
                                            o
                           0
                           O
                                                                o a>
X
LU
Cฃ>
LU
          •t-       -
 <1) C   -TJ O  X
r-O>ปCf-
 nj -M  (U    E0ซซ-        •*->
 s-t->c:ajo     >ปQ)^-
 OTJOป>+JTJi—  WW
 > c  o    c     co33c:
 MOio
U_OJ-T-Of-r- XIO-O
                                                   O TJ
                                                  •— C
                                                             (U  E T-       .—
                                                             en
                                                             s-
                              -o i-
                               c a>
                               o >
                               o o
                                  u
                               
                              j^ s-
                                               O  O) co
                                              4->  Ct-

                                              TJ C3 TJ
                                               C     C
                                               O     (O   *
                                               O   .i— •—
                                                  >>      to
                                              •t-  (U  jc  a.
                                                  O 4^  CO
                                               CO    •!-
                                               O  4) COTJ
                                               U  J- C
                                               ai     to  i-
                                                  4> a>  o
                                               0)  O E ซ*-

                                              	  3 to  0)
                                                jc ja
                                               o    i-    i—
                                                                             M- j- •—
                                                                             c o i— >
                                                                             ID M-  
                     c
                  >>TJ ซ
                 •P Ci—
                 T-  ซO •ป-
4-> JC ซO
 3  M
    T- >>
 o  3s +J
 0)     i-

 0)  t- T-
    fl) JQ
  • t-i 10
 tO t- Q.
 0)  O - JS O
                               to >>
                               $- -*-?
                               O JQ
                              JQ (O
                                  o.
                              •r- C t—
                              4J t- J3
                               3 r-  CO
                                  TJ i—
                               O C T-
                              i- 
r—  (O O
 •*-> ^  io
              c i-  re  e

             JC^  ซ0  W
               i  ••->     *
             JC 3 •ป-> JC
              m     o
             ซt o  c: 
                                            •e- r— t/J T-
                                            +*  0) J- JC
                                            O.    
                     a>
                    i CO
                                         E
                                         V
                                         a>
                                         c
                                         (O

                                         $-
                                         (Q
           to
           4->
           0)
           J>ฃ
           1-
           fO
                                                                                   •(->
                                                                                 C O
                                                                                 03 Q.
                                                                                 +J
                                                                                 i- ro
                                                                                 O
                                                                                 a. to
                                                                                 E ซ


                                                                                 O) (/)
                                                                                 i- z:
                                                                                 O CO

                                                                                    to
                                                             (O  0)
                                                             U •!->
                                                            f-  (O
                                                            ซ*-  c
                                                            i-  O>
                                                             c: ซr-
                                                             cn to
                                                            i-  
-------
                             APPENDIX III
               NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS PROM MATERIAL RECYCLING:
    SOME "MAXIMUM POSSIBLE" ESTIMATES FOR FERROUS METAL, ALUMINUM AND GLASS

                           by  Frank A.  Smith

                               INTRODUCTION

     This appendix presents estimates on the potential energy savings
from recycling the aluminum, ferrous, and glass fractions of ppst-
consumer residential and commercial solid waste over the time frame
1972-1990.  The basic issue is how much energy could be saved on a
nationwide basis from the recycling of these three waste materials as
substitutes for their virgin material counterparts (i.e., ferrous
waste for virgin pig iron, etc.), under what might be referred to as
the "maximum possible recovery scenario."  This is an attempt to set
some practical recycling level within the theoretical quantity limit
of total waste generation, but without pretending to consider political
or economic obstaotes as limits to recovery.  Results are summarized
for aluminum, ferrous, and glass in Table 1.

                               ASSUMPTIONS

     Without going into great detail, the following basic estimates
and assumptions underly the derivation of these results.

     1.  Total "available" post-consumer waste quantities were projected
         on the basis of recent EPA estimates of the ferrous, aluminum
         and glass fractions of residential and commercial solid waste
         streams, and unpublished contract work by Midwest Research
         Institute on baseline forecasts.  Construction, demolition,
         industrial, and other possible waste flow sources of material
         recovery were not considered.

     2.  Percentage of Waste Material processed for recovery was taken
         as 100% of the waste  generated in Standard Metropolitan
         Statistical Areas.  This amounts to roughly  70  to 74% of  total
         U.S.  generation between 1972 and 1974.

     3.  Recovery process  efficiencies were  assumed as  follows, based
         on research by Midwest  Research Institute:

                  Aluminum 65  -  75%
                  Ferrous  90%
                  Glass    70%

     4.   Energy  savings per ton  of material recycled were  taken
          as follows, based on  an assessment of available  literature
          and  current ongoing contract work,  (in 106 fctu/ton of
          material recovery):

                   Aluminum 200
                   Ferrous   12
                   Glass    1.3

-------
                                  III-2

                               CONCLUSIONS
    The "maximum possible" energy savings values presented in Table 1
are smaller than many would have guessed, and are in some cases
significantly less than other published estimates (e.g. see the report
of the National Commission on Materials Policy as well as EPA's First
Annual Report to Congress on Resource Recovery).  Others have based
their estimates on 100% recovery from a larger estimated waste stream,
and/or have used higher unit energy savings multipliers for certain
materials.  There is still much to be learned about this latter question,
but the values used here are believed to be the best and most recent
presently available engineering estimates.

    On the other hand, many will consider our assumption of 100 percent
processing of all?ซnetropolitan area waste as a very extreme case.  And
they would, of course, be correct.  The objective was to get a first-
order approximation to the maximum possible recovery as an upper bound
for purposes of discussion and policy input.  Later work will be
directed not only at "firming-up" these values, but also at providing
further evaluation of more realistic expectations.

    Whether one thinks the 1972 figure of 172 trillion Btu's is a
small or a large number depends on perspective.  It is about 0.25%
(one-quarter of one percent) of the nation's primary energy  (fossil
fuel plus hydroelectric plus nuclear) consumption for 1972  (approximately
70,000 trillion Btu).  At 3.8 million Btu's per barrel of crude oil,
172 trillion Btu's is equivalent to about 30 million barrels of crude
oil.  This potential erode oil equivalent would rise to almost 50 million
barrels by 198J and 70 million barrels by 1990.

-------
                                 III-3

                                TABLE 1

              NATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS PROM MAXIMUM POSSIBLE
                RECYCLING OP ALUMINUM, FERROUS, AND GLASS
                 FRACTIONS OF POST-CONSUMER SOLID WASTE
                           [TRILLIONS OF BTU'S]*
Materials**
Aluminum 146-56% ]
Ferrous 163-67%]
Glass [50-52%]
Total Energy
1972
82
81
8
172
1975
115
87
13
215
1980
164
95
15
274
1985
212
107
16
335
1990
274
116
16
406
 •Energy savings are based on "total system" analyses which include
  primary energy required for raw material acquisition and electricity
  input as well as for principal refining processes.

**Pigures in brackets indicate percentages of the individual material
  in nation-wide solid waste assumed to be recoverable from a "maximum
  possible* recovery effort.  Lower percentages are for earlier years,
  higher percentages for later years when larger proportions of popula-
  is expected to reside in SMSA's and when extraction efficiency expected
  to rise. "Recovery quantities based on residential and commercial
  solid waste only.
                   1

-------
      MARKETS  AND TECHNOLOGY FOR




         RECOVERY OF ENERGY




                FROM




             SOLID WASTE




                 BY




           STEVEN J. LEVY
U. S. ENVinC:*MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY




            MAY  VI,

-------
                               CONTENTS



INTRODUCTION			   1


SOLID, LIQUID AND GASEOUS FUELS 	   4

    Background	   4

    Marketability of Fuels Derived from Solid Waste 	   4

    Potential Market Opportunities for Fuels Derived from
      Solid Wastes  	   7
         Steam electric power plants  	   7
         Industrial operations	   8

    Systems for Producing Fuels from  Solid Waste  	   9
         Prepared solid waste as a supplemental fuel 	   9
         Pyrolysis	  11
              oil pyrolysis  	  13
              gas pyrolysis  	  15
         Methane production	  17


STEAM AND ELECTRICITY	  19

    Conventional Uses  of Steam	  19

    Marketability of Steam  	  20

    Market Opportunities for Steam  	  22
         District heating for steam	  22
         Industrial plants  	  25
         Steam  electric power plants  	  26

    Systems  for  Producing Steam 	  28
         Waste  heat boilers  	  28
         Water-wall incinerators  	  29
         Refuse-fired  support boilers 	  31

    Markets  for Electricity	  31

    Systems  for Producing Electricity 	  33

-------
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS 	  35




    Comparison of Market Opportunities 	  15




    Comparison of Fuel Types	  36




    Comparison of Technical Alternatives 	  36




    Selecting an Alternative 	  38






APPENDIX A - ENERGY DEMAND 	  40




    Coal 	  40




    Oil 	*	  41




    Gas	  41




    Electrical Generation	  43






REFERENCES	  44

-------
                               INTRODUCTION



     Energy consumption in the United States grew by 4.8 percent in


1973.   Prior to the present energy crisis, experts predicted that

                                                 o
energy demand would double between 1970 and 1990.   Efforts to achieve


independence from foreign energy supplies and increasing consumption


have created a demand for new fuel sources.


     Municipal solid waste is one raw material currently being discarded


that can be "mined" for its energy content.  In the U. S. in 1971, 125


million tons of solid waste from residential and commercial sources was


discarded with no attempt to recover energy.3  At 9 million BTU's


per  ton, this represents some 1,100 trillion BTU's per year, the energy


equivalent of 500,000 barrels of oil per day.  Of course, not all of


this solid waste would be available for recovery, but some 75 percent of


it is concentrated  in major metropolitan areas where processing plants


large enough to be  economically feasible could be located.


Industrial wastes,  and agricultural and forestry wastes represent the


equivalent of an additional 2.0 million barrels of oil per day  , although


collection and  transportation problems may restrict their use.


     Many different approaches to recovering the energy value of refuse


are  presently being examined.  Waterwall incinerators are currently


 generating steam in a number of  U.  S.  cities.   A new waterwall  incinerator


will be completed in Nashville  Tennessee In mid 1974.   In Baltimore,  Maryland,


 a pyrolysis system developed by Monsanto that will generate steam is

-------
                                    2




nearing completion.  St. Louis, Mo., is currently demonstrating a system




that uses the shredded, combustible portion of solid waste was a coal




substitute in a utility boiler.  Many communities are considering similar




systems and extensions of the concept to oil-fired boilers, and to the use




of wetpulped and/or pelletized solid waste as a fuel.  Pyrolysis systems




are being developed to convert solid waste into liquid and gaseous fuels.




Two of the most promising of these systems are the Garrett Research and




Development Company's system for producing oil, which is being demonstrated




in San Diego County, California, and Union Carbide's system for producing




a gaseous fuel, which is being tested by that company at its plant in




South Charleston, W. Va.  The recovery of methane from landfilled solid




waste is being practiced in a pilot plant in Los Angeles, California.




Electrical power generation is being explored in an EPA research project




being conducted by the Combustion Power Company.




      These technologies enable solid waste to be converted into a number




of different energy forms, including gaseous, liquid, and solid fuels and




steam and electricity.  The energy recovery system that should be employed




in any particular community depends upon the market for the output product.





     The value of a solid waste energy product should be equivalent,




on a heat basis, to the value  of  the fuel which  it replaces,  less any




additional costs incurred in its  use.  The current fuel crisis  has




significantly increased  the value of the product and reduced  the need  to




provide special incentives to  enhance  its marketability.




     To be marketable,  though,  the  solid waste energy products  must  have




qualities acceptable  to the user.   Steam and  electricity produced from




solid waste are equivalent to  those products  from other sources, but

-------
fuels produced from solid waste are physically and chemically different




from their fossil fuel counterparts.  Characteristics such as ash content,




heat value, corrosiveness, viscosity, and moisture content have to be




acceptable to the user.  For all energy products derived from solid waste,




factors such as reliability, quantity, and availability are also important.




     The objectives of this paper are to review the characteristics of




energy products available from existing energy recovery systems  (or




systems under development), to assess the marketability of such energy




products,  and to  identify potential market opportunities.




     In the following  sections of this paper each major energy product




recoverable from  solid waste is discussed.  These include the solid,




liquid, and gasseous fuels, and steam and electricity.  The  factors




affecting  the marketability of each product are examined, as well as  the




market opportunities.  The status of the technology to recover the




various energy products  is also examined.  In  the final section  of this




report the various  systems and energy products are compared  and  contrasted.

-------
                      SOLID. LIQUID AND GASEOUS FUELS




Background




     Solid, liquid and gaseous fuels can be produced from solid waste,




using a number of systems currently under development.  These fuels can




be used as a supplement to their fossil fuel counterparts:  coal, petroleum




and natural gas.




     Mixed municipal solid waste has a heating value of approximately




4,500 BTU per pound.  The heating value of solid waste is compared to




the fossil fuels in Table 1.  Further discussion of the characteristics




and uses of the fossil fuels is presented in Appendix A.








                                   TABLE 1




                     APPROXIMATE HEATING VALUE  OF FUELS








 	   Fuels	Heat Value	




       Coal                               11,000 to 14,000 BTU per pound




       No.  6 Heating Oil                  150,000 BTU per gallon



       Natural Gas	1,000'to 1,100 BTU per cubic foot




 	Municipal Solid Waste	4.500 BTU j>er  pound	



Marketability  of  Fuels Derived  from Solid Waste




     Fuels derived  from municipal  solid waste will have different physical




and chemical properties than conventional fuels and will,  therefore,




have different handling and combu^^on  characteristics.   In order to




analyze  the potential marker- ..or  these  fuels  it is necessary to identify these

-------
                                     5




characteristics and evaluate the constraints they will place on using




the fuel products.




     There are a number of general characteristics that determine the




marketability of fuels derived from solid waste regardless of whether




they are solid, liquid or gaseous.  These include:




     a.  Quantity of fuel produced - enough of the product must be




         available to justify any expenses that the user will incur in




         modifying his facility to accept this new fuel source.




     b.  Heating value - The heat value of each fuel must be high




         enough to minimize the effect of the fuel on the boiler or




         furnace efficiency.  Also the costs of transporting, storing




         and handling the fuel will go up as the heat value goes down




         because a greater quantity of fuel will have to handled to




         obtain the same amount of energy.




     c.  Reliability - A high degree of reliability on the supply of the




         fuel will increase its value because the user will not have to




         maintain standby equipment or fuel.




     d.  Quality  - The better the product,  the more it will be worth because




         the  customer's cost to use the product will be reduced.




     Solid  fuels  derived  from solid waste are currently being used as a




supplement  to coal  in  suspension  fired utility boilers.  They are also




being  considered  for use  in conjunction with oil  fired units and as  a




fuel supplement in  cement kilns.  Some factors that influence  the




marketability of  solid fuels derived  from solid waste  are:




     a.  Particle size -  Particles must be  small  enough  to  permit complete




         combustion when  burned in suspension.   This will vary with  the




         type of  unit  used  to burn the fuel, and  is particularly important

-------
                                     6
         if there are no burnout grates at the base of the combustion
         chamber.
     b.  Ash content -  Ash content should be kept to a minimum in order
         to prevent problems of errosion of the furnace walls and the fuel
         firing system.  Also high ash content can overload the ash
         removal system and may restrict the value of the bottom ash.
     c.  Moisture content - Moisture content will effect the heat value
         of the fuel.  If high enough it will reduce the combustion ef
         ficiency of the unit.
     A liquid fuel that can be produced from solid waste using the Garrett

Company pyrolysis system is a heavy, oil-like fuel which would be used as a
supplement to No. 6 fuel oil in large industrial or utility boilers.  Some
factors which will influence its marketability include:
     a.  Viscosity - If viscosity is too high the costs of storing and
         pumping can be excessive.  High viscosity can also cause plug
         ging of fuel  lines.
     b.  Volumetric heating value - The volumetric heat value  (BTU per
         gallon) will  influence the cost of transporting and storing  the
         fuel.
     c.  Chemical stability - If the fuel undergoes chemical change it
         will resstrict the length of  time it can be stored.
     d.  Special handling problems - The need to maintain separate
         storage and firing systems for the solid waste fuel,  and
         to purge the  firing systems after the fuel has been burned,
         places an extra burden o~ the user which may dimish its value.
     Most  gaseous fuels produced f~?m  solid waste have a lower heating value
than natural gas because th>../ contain  significant quantities of carbon
dioxide and, in some systems, nitrogen.  The distance which they can  be

-------
                                     7




transported is limited by the cost of compressing and pumping 'I'*1 Ras.




AN the Bl'V I'ontoiu noes* ilowu ihlM hooomoH prohibitive.
Potential Market Opportunities For Fuels Derived From Sol Ul Was to




     Most markets for solid waste fuels would be large utility or




industrial users who could blend 20 to 30 percent solid waste fuel with




conventional fuels and still use sufficient quantities of solid waste




fuels to justify the costs of special storage and firing facilities.




Steam electric power plants because of their large fuel needs and




proximity to urban areas, represent an attractive market opportunity




for solid waste fuels.  Major industrial operations  (such as cement plants,




steel mills, and paper mills) and district heating/cooling plants also




represent potential market outlets.




          Steam electric  power plants - Electric utilities operating




     fossil-fuel fired steam electric plants are the most promising




     market  for solid waste produced fuels.  They use very large quan-




     tities  of fuel, and  electricity demand  is  influenced  by the  same factors




     that influence solid waste  generation - population  and  industrial




     and commercial activity.  Furthermore,  the utility's  generating




     plants  are often  located  in close proximity to  the  urban area where




     the solid waste is generated.  Their quasi-public structure makes




     the electric  utility industry  more  conscious of community  problems,




     and more  receptive  to accepting the costs  and risks associated with




     using  these  fuels.




          Economic gain  is the overriding factor  influencing a  decision




     of this magnitude.   Although savings from using solid waste  fuels  can




     only amount  to  a  small fraction of  the  utility's total  fuel  costs,




     other  indirect  economic incentives  can  be realized  through

-------
                                8





improved community relationships.  For instance, a utility may more




easily gain approval of a new power plant site if it is part of a




solid waste disposal/energy recovery program.




     Savings in the cost of a solid waste fuel would be effectively




passed on to the utility's customers through automatic reductions




in the fuel adjustment rider.




     Industrial Operations - Many industrial operations are ideal




markets for fuel produced from solid waste.  Fuel from several




hundred tons of solid waste a day or more could be readily utilized




in all but the smallest cement plants, paper mills and steel mills,




or in many larger manufacturing plants.




     A typical paper board mill, for instance uses about 25,000




pounds of steam to produce one ton of boxboard.   A small, 360




ton per day plant would require 400,000 pounds of steam per hour,  the




equivalent yield of 1,200 tons of solid waste per day.




     Most paper mills currently burn their own bark and wood waste




in these boilers as a supplement to conventional fuels.  Although




this might reduce the capacity of the market of solid waste fuels




somewhat, it should ease the marketing task because the industry is




already accustomed to burning waste fuels.




     Feasibility studies are currently being done to examine the




concept of using solid waste as a fuel in cement manufacturing kilns.




The solid waste would be used to supplement  the coal or other fuel being




used and any ash remaining would be incorporated into the final pro-




duct.  Cement kilns, require about 8 million BTU's of fuel per ton




of cement.  Plant capacity re^es in size from  1,000 to 3,000 or more




per day.  Therefore, ev.n a  small plant, using  refuse as 20 percent

-------
                                       9


     of the fuel load,  could handle the fuel produced from 400 tons of


     solid waste per day.





Systems for Producing Fuels From Solid Waste


     The technology for converting solid waste into fuel is very new and


is rapidly developing.   All of the systems being considered today were


conceived since 1968.  Nevertheless, several full scale demonstrations


are presently (or soon will be) in operation.  Additionally, many com-


munities are proceeding to implement full scale systems using these


technologies.


          Prepared Solid Waste As A Supplemental Fuel - The City of St.


     Louis, Missouri, with demonstration grant assistance from the


     Environmental Protection Agency, is producing a dry, shredded solid


     waste fuel which is being used to  supplement pulverized coal in an

                                                             8
     existing Union Electric Company suspension fired boiler.   Solid


     waste fuel provides 10 percent of  the  energy used in the boiler.


     At  this rate, the  125 megawatt boiler  is capable of burning 350


     tons of prepared solid waste  fuel  per  day.  The project engineers


     are experimenting  with  increasing  the  solid waste fuel to 20 percent


     of  the boiler  feed.



          The process  is divided into two distinct operations - preparation


     firing.  A fuel transportation system  is also required in St. Louis


     because the  fuel  is prepared  18 miles  from the power plant.  At the


     processing plant  (Figure  1) municipally collected solid waste is shredded


     in  a horizontal hammermill and fed into an air classifier which  separates


     the material into  heavy  (dense) and light fractions.  The heavy  fraction


     is  passed over  a magnetic belt to  remove ferrous metals.  The light,

-------
    ft-,?-1
    5' '*V i
1
an
   a
rjE - .-" • ;"'• ' • *- :ซ.-.? fj .- •,
jfev  •;.•'* :* .ซs^-^i& •;ป•-
65*1 /** * ''iA -g< * Si'J i i.' vi *' ,. ><- r , ;   ' . s(ป(
&*•ซ '/-^*4&?-^-?*r"iv;- '* • ,  i";i
                        iซxtis^iii
              %pi|   i^.^^ :';?J|
                               :^
                            ^-
          fr
                        j^:ซ
    ;;*^*s
    '\l  l>
          ..:..-/ป-•--3^riซ?'
          .M:,"^-. "• -""'" "•."•
          a- 'ฅ-"' t-*> • •'•
         ^-i'fofe*
 ^•.
-------
                                      11




most Iv combututhlf material is stored temporarily in a bin and  IK then




t t :u\:;l erred to !'•> rnMป- y.-iid limiHtfr I rut leiM  loi I In- I rip  I ซ•  I lir powi-i




plant.  At the power pJnnt (Figure 2) the  prepared Inol In irnriHlerred




to a smaller bin from which it can be pneumatically blown into  the




boiler.




     Although still under investigation, similar  systems are already




being implemented in several other communities.   In Ames, Iowa  a  prepared




fuel will be used in a municipally owner power  plant  , and in Chicago  it




will be used by the Commonwealth Edison Company.    In East  Bridgewater,




Mass., Combustion Equipment Associates  is  preparing a solid  waste fuel




for use by the Weyerhaeuser Company.11  The  Union Electric Company




has announced a 70 million dollar program  to expand its demonstration




operation to serve the entire metropolitan St.  Louis area.1
     Other studies are considering the use of this fuel as a supplemental




fuel in oil-fired boilers, preparing the fuel using a wet pulping method




developed by the Black-Clawson Company, and pellitizing the fuel so




that it can be used in grate-fired boilers.




Pyrolysis - pyrolysis is  the  thermal decomposition of materials in the




absence or near absence of oxygen.  The high  temperature and  the "starved




air" situation in  the pyrolysis  of solid wastes  results in a breakdown




of  the materials  into three parts:   (1) a  gas  consisting primarily of




hydrogen, methane  and carbon  monoxide;  (2)  an "oil"  that is  liquid at




room temperature  and includes organic  chemicals  such as acetic acid, acetone




and methanol;  (3)  a char  consisting  of  almost pure  carbon,  plus any  glass,




metal,  or  rock that may have  been processed.   The design  of  the individual




system controls which of  these outputs will be the  predominant "product"13

-------
                                   12
    Figure 2.  The solid waste fuel is delivered to the power plant and is fired
pneumatically into the boiler.

-------
There are currently two systems under development which show promise of


producing a fuel of sufficient quality and yield as to be marketable.


A liquid fuel is to be produced in the Garrett Research and Development


Company's "Flash Pyrolysis" system undergoing EPA demonstration in

                             14
San Diego County, California.    A gaseous fuel  is to be produced in a Union


Carbide System being tested by that company in S. Charleston, West


Virginia.15



     Oil Pyrolysis  - The demonstration plant being built in San Diego


County, California will produce an oil-like,  liquid  fuel which will


be  used by  the  San Diego  Gas and  Electric Company  as a supplemen-


 tal fuel  in an  existing oil-fired boiler. This  fuel,  which  is


 produced  at the rate  of 1.0 barrels  per  ton  of  solid waste,  has


 a heating value of about  94,000 BTU  per  gallon.   This is  about  65


 percent  of  the  heating value of No.  6  fuel oil,  on a volumetric  basis.


 This oil has a  higher moisture content  and a higher viscosity than


 No. 6 oil.


      The Garrett Process, for which a flow diagram is shown in Figure 3,


 consists of a complex "front-end" preparation system followed by a


 relatively simple pyrolysis reactor.  To prepare the solid wastes for


 the reactor it must first be shredded.   An air classifier then separates


 out a light combustible fraction, which, after being dried, is shred-


 ded again; this time to a particle size of l/16th of an inch.  This


 material, now resembling "vacuum cleaner catch," is then introduced


 into the reactor where it is mixed with hot glowing char in an inert


 atmosphere.  In less than a second, and at a temperature of 900ฐF  the


 material is pyrolyzed.  As  the char-gas mixture comes out of the


 reactor the char  is separated for reuse within  the  reactor and  the

-------
                            14
             RECYCLING Of SOUO WASTES

                     VJA PY5WLYSIS
cum
6USS
                                                  •*- FUUKADON
                                                    MttMSPOSAL
                                              4JMtlV/BBI
Figuiซ 3.  The "Garrett" process produces an oil-like liquid fuel from

solid waste.

-------
                               15




gases are quenched to recover the oil.  The process char is recirculated




as the energy source to pyrolyze the incoming material.




     Gas Pyrolysls - A gaseous fuel product is being generated by a




process under development by the Linde Division of the Union




Carbide Corporation.  This company is currently constructing




a 200 ton per day test facility at its plant in S. Charleston,




W. Virginia.




     The key element of the system Is a vertical shaft furnace.




As depicted in Figure 4, refuse is fed into the top of the




furnace.  Oxygen entering at the base of the furnace reacts




with the char formed from the refuse.  This reaction generates




a temperature in the hearth high enough to melt and fuse the




metal and glass.  This molten metal and glass drains continuously




into a water quench  tank forming a hard granular material.




     The hot gases  formed by reaction of the oxygen and char




rise up through the  column of refuse and pyrolyze the refuse.




In the upper  portion of the furnace, the hot gas also dries




the Incoming refuse.  The gases exit the furnace at about 200*F.




The Mxhmittt KOW contains (<>nniderab)c< wfltซ?ป vapor,-nowie ซH I mint




and minor amounts of undesirable constituents.  These components are




removed in  a gas-cleaning system.




    The resultant gas  is a clean burning fuel comparable to




natural gas in combustion characteristics, but with a heating

-------
                             16
        REFUSE
     FEED HOPPER

          SEAL—ป

          FEEDLOCK
           SEAL


           SHAFT
          FURNACE
      OXYGEN
COMBUSTION —
   ZONE
            FUEL GAS
            PRODUCT
GAS CLEANING
   TRAIN
              MOLTEN
             MATERIAL

        WATER QUENCH
                                            RECYCLE
      WASTE WATER
  GRANULAR
   RESIDUE
  Figure 4. The key element of the Union Carbide process is a vertical shaft furnace.

-------
                             17
value of about 300 BTU/cublc foot.  It is essentially
free of sulphur compounds and nitrogen oxides.  Lt burns at
approximately the same temperature as natural gas.  This gas
can be substituted for natural gas in an existing facility.
The only plant modification would be enlarging the burner
nozzle so that the volumetric flow rate can be Increased.
     One limitation on use of this gas is the cost of
 compressing  it  for storage and  shipment.  Compression costs
 per million  BTU's of  gas will be  3.1  times greater than  for
 natural gas.  This is because it  requires a  larger quantity  of
 this gas to  yield the same amount of  energy  as  natural gas.
 As a result,  markets  for  this gas will have  to  be within 2
 miles  of the producing  facility and only short  term  storage
 can be contemplated.
      Methane Production - When  solid  waste  decomposes  in an  anaerobic

 (oxygen-free) environment, it produced methane  and carbon dioxide.
 Programs are currently underway to recover methane produced  from
 the natural  decomposition of solid waste in  a sanitary landfill  '
 and from the accelerated  decomposition of solid waste  in a mechanical
 digester,  such  as is  used to digest sewage sludge.
      In the  sanitary  landfill recovery program  a well  is drilled
 through the  fill and  lined with perforated pipe. The  gases  are
 pumped out of the fill  and  then cleaned  of  the  carbon  dioxide using
 membrane  filtration  or  cyrogenic  separation  techniques.   The NRG
 NuFuel Company  is  installing gas  recovery systems in landfills
 operated by  the County  of Los Angeles and the  city of  Phoenix.
 Both  of these sites  possess very specific characteristics which are

-------
                               18






necessary if the concept is to be feasible.




     The National Science Foundation is currently supporting a




research effort by the Dynatecb Corporation to examine the feasibility




of combining solid wast0 with sewage sludge for digestion in a



                    18
mechanical digester. ฐ  Pipeline quality gas would be recovered at •




the rate of 3,700 cubic feet of 900 BTU gas per ton of solid waste.

-------
                                    19
                           STEAM & ELECTRICITY





Conventional Uses of Steam



     Steam can be thought of as the transportation system in an energy



network.  The chemical energy of the fuel is transported by the steam



as thermal energy to the user where it is converted to mechanical



energy.



     In a steam electric power plant a fuel is burned in a furnace en-



closed in walls constructed of tubes filled with water.  Heat, released



by the burning fuel, converts the water to steam.  The steam is then



piped to a turbine where it gives up it's heat energy by driving a



generator which produces electricity.  Due to practical limitations on



the efficiency with which heat can be transferred to the steam and



can later be extracted  from it, about 10,000 BTU of fuel energy are



required to produce one kilowatt-hour (kwh) of electricity having 3,412


              19
BTU of  energy.



      Steam temperatures generally range from 250ฐF to 1,050ฐF and



pressures range  from 150 pounds per  square inch  (psi) to 3,500 psi.  The



limitations placed  on  temperature and pressure are the strength of  the



materials used  to construct  the system.   In electric power plants the



greatest efficiency is achieved at  the highest temperatures  and pres-



sures.  In steam distribution systems temperatures are kept  as  low  as



possible to minimize heat  loss  in the delivery system  and pressures are



kept  as low as  possible to reduce the cost of  the  system and minimize



danger  from bursting pipes.

-------
                                   20






     In systems that use solid waste as the sole or primary fmซl, tin-




steam is usually produced at (>()() pounds per square Inch or UปHH  In




to minimize slagging and corrosion of the boiler tubes.  The steam can




be further processed in separate units to bring it to the pressure at




which it will be used.









Marketability of Steam




     Unlike fuels derived from solid waste, steam produced from  solid




waste is  indistinguishable  from  steam  from any other  source.




     To be marketable this  steam must meet the specific needs of the




user.  When designing a solid waste disposal/steam recovery system some




factors which must be considered are:




     a*  Proximity to Customer - The facility must be close enough to




         economically serve the  steam market.  Steam  can only be trans-




         ported about 2 miles, and in  congested areas, expensive pipe




          line  installation  problems may  further restrict this distance.




     b.   Value - The cost at which the steam is delivered must be com-



         petitive with  the  costumers alternate energy sources.




     c.   Quantity -  The amount of steam  supplied must be compatible




         with  the customers needs.   If peak loadings  cannot be supplied




          entirely by burning refuse  then standby,  fuel-fired boilers




         will  be needed.




     d.   Operating  Schedule - The  steam  producing  facility must  be  set




          up on an operating basis which  satisfies  the operating  schedule




          of the steam customer.




     e.   Availability of  Refusp  -  fhe  municipality must  insure  that it




          has  enough refuse  co meet  the steam  output  commitments.

-------
                                   21






    t".  Steam Quality - The  tempernture and pressure at which  the steam




        is produced must ho  :\  I unction of both  the optini
-------
                                    22






     If on the other hand, the municipality is supplying steam which the




customer does not otherwise have the capability of producing, tlu-n the




municipality must guarantee the reliability of the supply.  Although




the municipality's costs will go up, the value of the steam will also




go up.  The steam would now have a value equivalent to what the customer




would have to spend to produce it himself.








Market Opportunities for Steam




     Most metropolitan areas have one or more major outlets for steam.




Yet, despite the fact that proven technology exists for generating steam




from municipal solid waste, constraints to its use has made the marketing




of the steam a very difficult task.




     District Heating & Cooling Systems - There are about 450 commercial




     and campuci district steam heating systems operating in this country.^




     Many of these systems also distribute chilled water for cooling




     buildings during warm weather.  Table 2 lists some of the cities which



     have steam systems serving their central business or industrial areas.




     The fuel crisis has also encouraged other cities to consider such




     systems in an effort to make more efficient use of limited, and increas-



     ingly more costly fuels.

-------
                                23


                            TABLE 2


    SELECTED  CITIES  SERVED  BY DOWNTOWN HEATINC/COOLINC LOOPS*
    Akron,  OH.                           Hartford,  CN.
    Allentown,  PA.                       Houston, TX.
    Atlanta,  GA.                         Indianapolis,  IN.
    Baltimore,  MD.                       Los Angeles, CA.
    Birmingham, AL.                      St. Paul,  MN.
    Boston, MA.                         Nashville, TN.
    Cheyenne, WY.                        New York,  NY.
    Cleveland,  OH.                       Oklahoma City,  OK-
    Dayton, OH.                         Omaha,  NB.
    Denver, CO.                         Philadelphia,  PA.
    Detroit,  MI.                         Pittsburg, PA.
    Eugene, OR.                         San Diego, CA.
    Grand Rapids,  MI.                    Seattle, WA.
    Harrisburg, PA.                      Tulsa,  OK.
        *International District Heating Association.   1973 Rate

         Reference  Book.   Pittsburgh

     Steam is distributed  at a low pressure, generally in the neigh-

borhood of 250 pounds per square i/ach, which can be easily provided

by a solid waste disposal facility.   Unlike the demand for electricity,

which has certain peak periods,  steam demand is fairly constant

throughout the day and from day to day.  Seasonal variations can be

significant, but if the utility also distributes chilled water it

can operate its chilling plant with a  steam-driven turbine.   In any

event, steam demand can be sufficient to accomodate a constant

amount of steam produced in an energy recovery plant during most,

if not all, of the year.

     Because steam cannot be transported for more than about two

miles, the solid waste plant r—at be located close to the steam

users.  This will usually mean Jie central part of the city.

Although land costs may ,>e higher, solid waste hauling costs should

-------
                               24
be minimized, because of the proximity of the plant to the waste
generators.
     Steam produced in a solid waste disposal facility could he
sold to a district heating utility.  The value of the HI cam to tho
utility would be equivalent to the price it would pay for the
amount of fuel needed to produce the steam.  However, if by purchasing
this steam, the utility is able to expand its service to customers
whom it previously lacked the capacity to serve, then the steam
would have a higher value equivalent to the utility's own cost for
producing steam.                                      ,
     In cities where no steam distribution network exists, the
municipality can consider the installation of a complete solid
waste steam generating incinerator and the steam distribution
network.  To minimize the costs, this could possibly be tied to a
major urban renewal project or the construction of a large industrial
park or complex.  Although the municipality would then be able to sell
the steam at a much higher price, it would also be responsible for a
much higher capital investment.  Because it would be the only source of
supply for its customers, it would also have to assume the responsi-
bility for total reliability.  A back-up system would be needed to
provide steam when  the  incinerator was out of service or if  there
was an interruption in  the delivery of refuse to the facility.
      There are two systems currently being constructed that will
 produce steam for uti.14tv distribution.   The first system, being
 built in Baltimore, Maryland with grant assistance from EPA, will
 produce steam for sale to the local utility.21  The utility will
 use the steam in its existing steam distribution loop.  Revenue

-------
                               25




from the sale of steam will amount to at least $3.50 per ton of




refuse.




     In the second project, the city of Nashville created an ludepen—




dent, non-profit authority, which will sell steam and chilled water




to commercial and government office buildings in downtown Nashville,




using refuse-fired waterwall incinerators as the primary steam




source.    Fossil-fuel-fired, back-up boilers will also be avail-




able.  Steam revenues will generate $10.00 per ton of refuse.  This




price, nearly three times that being paid for Baltimore's steam,




reflects the cost of the complete steam generation and distribution




system.  Chilled water, which  is solid at a much higher price, will




provide an even greater amount of revenue - about $25.00 per ton of




refuse.




Industrial Plants - Large  inustrial  facilities such  as  paper mills,




food processers and major  manufacturing plants are also steam  customers.



 Industrial customers which operate their facilities 24 hours per




 day are preferred because a waterwall incinerator is designed for




 around-the-clock operation.  Some industrial users may place specific




 constraints on the quantities of steam to be delivered at certain




 given times and will most likely want to specify temperature and




 pressure.  These factors must be identified and incorporated in the




 design of the incinerator.




      Although it is impossible to predict the long term effect of




 the energy crisis on industrial needs, fuel shortages should improve




 the marketability of a reliable steam supply.

-------
                             26
     Many cities have single industries large enough to utilize all




the steam that would be produced from a large solid waste facility.




In Saugus, Massachusetts a 1,700 ton per day waterwall incinerator is




being built.  All of the steam produced in this plant (about 350,000




pounds per hour) will be used in an adjacent General Electric Company




Plant for heating and cooling, electric power generation and a variety



                                        23
of manufacturing and testing operations.
 Steam Electric  Power  Plants  - Although  steam electric  power  plants




 use  tremendous  quantities  of steam it may be difficult to  develop




 satisfactory marketing arrangements in  this  sector.






      The costs of accomodating an outside  steam source may exceed the




 value of the expected fuel savings.  Modification of the pressurized




 components of the power plant could involve costly construction




 operations and could require that the power plant be kept out of




 service for a lengthy period of time.   Also, a boiler cannot be






  be  operated at  the same efficiency* both with and without the




  supplemental steam.   For  one of  the two modes additional  fuel will



  be  needed  to obtain  the same energy output.

-------
                              27
     The total amount of electricity (demand)  that a utility must




produce varies considerably throughout the day and from day to day.




The utility's most efficient plants are used continuously to supply




the minimum demand (base load) on the system while the less efficient




or otherwise more costly plants are used to supply the peak demands.




Thus each power plant within a utility system, and in fact, each




boiler within each plant will have a different rate of utilization




(load factor) depending on its relative operating efficiency.  The




utility would only be able to buy steam when the outfitted boiler is "on-




line" .  This would be 75 percent or more of the year for a base




load unit, but could be 25 percent or less for a peak loaded unit.




     One way to overcome the problems of retrofitting an existing




unit would be to build a new base load superheater and turbine -
 *Efficiency - Each power plant requires a certain number of BTU's




  of fuel to generate 1 kilowatt hour (kwhr) of electricity.  The




  less fuel needed, the more efficient is the plant.  One kilowatt




  hour equals 3,412 BTU's but the maximum difference between the




  safe operating temperature of the power plant and the temperature




  at at which heat can be discarded to the environment, limits power




  plant efficiency to a maximum of about 40 percent.  Therefore




  the most efficient steam electric power plants require about 8,500




  BTU's per kwhr.  Most modern r^er plants use about 10,000 BTU's




  per kwhr (33 percent efficiency).

-------
                                  28
     generator set especially to take steam produced in the solid waste




     facility.  The Florida Power and Light Company, in seeking an




     arrangement whereby it could purchase energy from a planned




     facility in Dade County proposed such an arrangement.2^  The generating



     facility would be built by the company building the solid waste




     facility, but it would be "bought" by Florida Power & Light.




     Florida Power and Light would then buy the steam and also pay for




     the facility on a "units of electricity produced" basis.  This




     requires capital investment by the municipality and increases




     the financial risk because reimbursement is tied to production.




Systems for Producing Steam




     Systems available for the generation of steam from solid waste




include waste heat boilers, waterwall incinerators, and refuse-fired




support boilers.




     Waste Heat Boilers - In addition to their use in many industrial




     processes, waste-heat boilers have been used in the early design of




     heat recovery incinerators in this country.  The boiler package is




     placed in the flue following the secondary combustion chamber of a




     conventional refractory lined, mechanical grate incinerator.  The




     poor operating characteristics of refractory lined incinerators has



     made this approach obsolete.25




          A waste heat boiler is employed quite effectively, however,




     in a new system currency being built in Baltimore, Maryland.

-------
                                 29
In this plant,which was designed by Monsanto, the boiler follows




a pyrolysis kiln.  The main components of the system are shown




schematically in fig. 5.  Heat cannot be recovered from the kiln




directly because it is used to accomplish the pyrolysis of the




solid waste.  O^ce the pyrolysis gases are formed they are com-




busted in a separate afterburner and  the heat that IR released  is




then recovered as steam using a package type, waste heat boiler.




Two hundred thousand pounds per hour of steam will be recovered




from the processing of 1,000 tons of solid waste per day.  The




steam will be transmitted 3/4 of a mile, by pipeline, to an exist-




ing steam distribution system which is operated by the local utility.




Waterwall Incinerator - Current incinerator design practices have




almost entirely  replaced the refractory lined combustion chambers




with waterwall furnaces.  This type of construction consists of




furnace walls constructed of vertically arranged metal tubes joined




side-to-siue with metal fins.  Radiant energy from the burning  of




refuse is absorbed by water passing through  the tubes.  Additional




boilers packages,  located in  the back passages of the incinerator,




control the conversion  of this water  to steam of a specified tempera-




 ture and  pressure.  By transferring the heat released "by combustion to




 the water,  the volume of  air needed to keep the operating temperature




 of the incinerator at an acceptable level is reduced.  This in turn




 reduces the size of the uu*.~ and its air pollution control equipment.




 In fact,  the volume of gas entering the air pollution control equipment




 will be only 25 percent that of an air-cooled, refractory unit.  So




 effective is this means ~f temperature control that this type of con-




 struction has become standard even in incinerators not having heat

-------
                                            30
                                                                          CLEAN AIR TO
                                                                          ATMOSl'HfcRE
                                                              GAS
                                                                                      STACK
                                                                                     RESIDUE
    RECEIVING
         MAGNET
 WATER     _
QUENCHING   +
          FERROUS
           METAL
Figure 5.  The Monsanto system recovers steam following the pyrolysis of municipal solid waste.

-------
                                     31



     recovery provisions.



     Refuse Fired Support  Boilers - In Europe many municipalities combine



     waterwall refuse units with separate fossil fired boilers in one


              26
     facility.    Steam from the two separate units is integrated to



     drive one turbine/generator system.  This arrangement is shown in



     fig. 6 where the unit on the left is a refuse fired boiler and the



     one on the right is coal fired.



          One reason this concept is widely used in Europe, but not presently



     used at all in this country is that unlike this country, many



     European municipal governments are responsible for solid waste



     disposal, power generation, distribution of steam for district



     heating and the operation of electrically powered transportation



     systems.





Markets  for Electricity



     Like steam, electricity produced  from solid waste would be indis-



tinguishable from electricity produced by any conventional method.  The



problem  in marketing electricity, though, is  that  it can only be mar-



keted  to the  electric utility serving  the area, because within that



service  area  the utility  is generally  exempt  from  competition.  The  only



exception to  that would be where the utility  is municipally  owned, but


                                                                   27
this amounts  to only 10 percent  of  the nations  generating  capacity.



     The price  that a utility will  pay for electricity will  depend upon



whether  it is used  to satisfy base  load or peak load  demands.  Although



peak load marketing will  command a  much higher  price, a municipality



would  need to sell  electricity  en ? continuous  basis  (i.e. os base load)



in order to maintain a  continuous solid waste disposal  operation.

-------
                                      32
Solid waste fired
   boiler tubes
 Solid waste
   burning grate
                                                       •<•—Common flue
                                          •*—Coal fired coal burners
                                             •Pulverized coal burners
          Figure 6.  Separate solid waste and coal-fired boilers produce
                     steam  for one turbine.

-------
                                   33



     A municipality considering tnซ; sale of electricity to a utility



should seek to establish a floating price for the electricity whereby



the price would rise as the demand on the utility increased.  The price



would then be a function of the incremental direct costs the utility



would incur in producing the additional electricity.




Systems for Producing Electricity



     The fuel and steam producing systems discussed earlier can be expanded



to include power generation.  An economic analysis would have to be under-



taken to determine if the revenue produced from the sale of the electricity



would be enough to offset the additional capital and operating costs of



the equipment.



     The direct generation of electricity is being explored through a


                                                               28
research project funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.    Start-



ing from a basic concept, the Combustion Power Company has developed a



completely integrated solid waste combustion - power generation system.



Current efforts invlove the shakedown of a 100 tou per day pilot plant.



     Incoming municipal refuse is shredded and air classified to



remove noncombustibles.  Metal and glass are further separated for recovery.



The combustible fraction is pneumatically transported to an intermediate



storage facility and from there into a pressurized fluid bed combustor.



The hot, high pressure gasec  from the combustor pass through several stages



of air cleaning equipment to  remove particulates.  The cleaned gases are



then expanded  through  a gas  turbine that will generate 1,000 KW of



electricity.  Although the  pilot plant operates  at  only  45  PSIG,  commercial



plants vould  operate at pressure in excess  of  100  PSIG.  A schematic  of



this system is shown in Figure  7.



     Performance  problems which hav caused  accelerated  deterioration  of




the  turbine blades fcave  slov^d the development of this process.  This

-------
               GENERATOR
                             EXHAUST
                              DUCTS
Figure  7.   The CPU-400 produces  electricity from  the combustion
            of solid waste  in  a high pressure fluidized bed.

-------
                                   35




and other problems must be solved before this is a technically and



economically feasible system for energy recovery.
                          ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS




      The key to sucessful implementation of  a solid waste energy recovery




 program is selecting a system which is compatible with the energy market




 as well as the community's solid waste disposal requirements.  Once a




 suitable market has been identified, an appropriate system can be designed




 which will convert the solid waste energy potential into a marketable




 form.




 Comparison of Market Opportunities




      The most important characteristics of the market lor solid waste




 produced fuels and energy are that it be large and that it be favorably




 located.  The size of  the market  is very important because the customer




 may have to absorb the cost of process changes needed to accommodate




 the new energy source.  This is particularly true when producing an oil




 or dry prepared fuel because special storage and firing facilities are




 needed, and these fuels would only be fired as a small percentage of the




 total fuel load.




      Steam and gas can only be  transported very short distances and




 although the  dry and liquid fuels can be transported farther   trans-




 portation costs should be minimized wherever possible.  Therefore, the




 preferred market would be a facilily  located near  the point  of  solid




 waste generation.




      Steam electric power plants -re  the most  obvious market to be given




 initial  consideration.  The energy  value of  solid  waste,  on  a per capita




 basis, amounts  to between 5 and 10  --rcent of  the  per capita use  of  fossil




 fuels for electric  power gene  „::ion.   The multiplicity  of plants  comprising

-------
                                    36
 most utility systems increases the probability that an acceptable market  car
 be found.

      Steam distribution systems are also a good prospective market.   The
 rising  cost and scarcity of fuels  is even creating a demand for new
or expanded systems.  These systems are centrally located in order to
serve the greatest concentration of customers, so haul distance would be
minimized.  There is less fluctuation in load than in electric pover plants,
and the lower operating temperature and pressure is compatible with the
constraints of a refuse fired system.
Comparison of Fuel Types
     The key to marketing energy from solid waste is producing an energy
 form that  can be sold  and used without consideration to  the fact that it
is derived  from solid waste.  In addition, the type of fuel produced
should be storable and transportable so that the solid waste facility
can be built and operated independently of the fuel market.
     Steam  and electricity satisfy the first objective, but neither can
be stored and steam can be transported only very short distances.
     The solid and liquid fuels can be transported and can even  be
stored for brief periods of time (several days to several weeks).
However, both fuels require the user to install special storing  and
firing facilities.  In addition, the user must follow special handling
procedures  to minimize problems of air pollution and corrosion.
     Gaseous fuels are less likely to require special handling or need
separate facilities for storage and firing, but those currently  being
produced cannot economically be compressed for  extended  storage  and  shipment.
The best of the gaseous fuels  cannot be shipped more than two miles.
Comparison  of Technological Altersr.tiyes
     Municipalities require solid waste disposal systems that  are operationally

-------
                                    37





reliable and involve a minimutu of wechnical risk.  Futhermore, the




system must do an environmentally acceptable job at an economic cost -




although not necessarily at the least possible cost.




     Risk  and reliability are usually evaluated  through examination of




existing,  full size systems in actual operation.  A number of energy




recovery systems which  are currently being proposed to cities, however,




have not had this  long  term operating experience.  These systems have




generally  been developed by private companies which hold patent rights




to  the process.  Risks  of procurement of  such systems can be  reduced by "turn




key" solicitations subject to  detailed  performance  specifications.




     Municipalities can also minimize risk and  avoid large capitol




investments by entering long-term contracts  for private ownership and




operation  of  the solid  waste disposal/energy recovery system.




     Waterwall incinerators are  already in widespread use  in  this




country.   While  there is  little  risk of technical failure, the long-term




reliability of  these  systems has not yet been established.  Waterwall




 incinerators are usually  the most costly of  the energy recovery systems,



on both a  capitol  cost and operating cost basis.




     The 1,000 TPD pyrolysis - steam recovery system in Baltimore will  be in full



 operation in late 1974.  It is being built under a turn-key,  fixed price




 contract with guarantees on the  daily throughput, amount  of  air emissions




 and extent of burnout.




      The system expected to be the least costly of the energy recovery



options is the  use of dry shredded waste as  a prepared  fuel.   One  full




 size plant has been in operacif-x for over two years and several others




 are presently under construction.  This system  has been particularly



 attractive because energy can be recovered with a minimum amount of




 processing.

-------
                                     38



     Both oil and gas recovery through pyrolysis^ and direct conversion




to electricity are undergoing demonstrations at less than full size.




Another generation of hardware will be needed before wi tit-spread utl 1 l?,nt Ion




can be expected.




     The only energy recovery options available now are waterwall incin-




eration and prepared refuse  fuel systems, although neither has been com-




pletely evaluated.  Steam recovery through pyrolysis should follow closely




behind there, but the other  options  will not be  ready  for full scale use




until the  late  1970's.  Some acceleration of this can be expected if




the companies producing the  systems  assume the development risk through




direct ownership  of the facility or  by  offering  them initially on




a "no-risk" basis.




Selecting  an Alternative




     Implementing a solid waste energy  recovery  program  is for more




complex  than just selecting  a  technology.  It  first,  and above all else,




requires securing a reliable and realistic market.




     All aspects of the market must  be  carefully understood by both the




user of  the  fuel  or energy and the municipality  supplying it. The con-




straints of  the market will  then indicate the  technical  alternatives




available. Table 3 highlights the various major markets for  solid waste




energy and the  possible energy forms that can  satisfy those markets.




Selecting  a  technology will  then be  narrowed to  just one or a few  alterna-




tives.   The  final selection  of a system will depend on the  status  of




its availability, and  thu*  •'t's relative risk, and  the estimated net




operating  cost.

-------
                                       39

                                     T*-3LE 3
                         MARKETS FOR SOLID WASTE ENERGY
      Fuel Uses
                              Solid Waste Energy Form
Conventional
Energy Source
                           Steam
Electricity
        User
  Coal
  Gas
  Oil
-Industrial Boilers and
 Furnaces
-Power Plants*

-Residential and Com-
 merical  Heating
-Industrial Boilers and
 Furnaces
-Power Plants*

-Residential and Com-
 merical Heating
-Industrial Boilers and
 Furnaces
-Transportation
-Power Plants*
  Electricity
-Utility Distribution
-Industrial Plants
-Municipal Lighting
-Mass Transit Systems
  Steam
-Utility Distribution
*Electric or steam utility plants.

-------
                                     40
                        APPENDIX A - ENERGY DEMAND


     In examining the prospects for marketing solid waste fuels, it is


helpful to review the forms and usts of conventional fuels.  Total

                                                              oo
energy demand in the U. S. in 1970 was 67.8 quadrillion BTU's.


This is equivalent to 32.5 million barrels of oil per day.*  This


energy is supplied by three major fossil fuel sources-oil, coal, and


gas; and by hydroelectric, geothermal, and nuclear power.  Transportation,


industrial operations  and residential-commercial users account for the


major uses of energy.  The matrix in figure 8 shows the relationship


between energy sources and uses.


Coal


     Coal has been the staple of American energy supply.  In addition to


its abundance, coal is the cheapest source of energy currently available.


Unfortunately, when coal is burned its high sulfur and ash contents


contribute to air pollution control problems.  Other environmental


problems associated with a major percentage of our coal result  from


strip mining and the subsequent release of acid-mine drainage.  Coal's


predominant use in this country is in large industrial and utility


furnaces or boilers where the cost of adequate air pollution  control


equipment can be economically absorbed.  The BTU content  of American


coals range from 11,000 to 14,000 BTU/lb.
*Calculated by converting  the energy produced from  the other  fuel  forms


 to the equivalent amount  of oil needed to obtain the same amount  of


 energy.

-------
                                     41
pu



     In .hJ/0 the U. S. consumed 13.9 million bucrcts ol. oil piปv i\ปy.



01 thJs, 3.:> ma llion Imiii-i;- wi.-re imports.  A,tl  lurtltrr iiu-i I-.JSCM Ja



oil consumption are a] so projecLec! to come from  imports, uu/stly from


                30
the Middle East.    With this supply having become politically vulnerable,



new sources oi oil will be needed to satisfy our increasing demand.



     Crude oil is processed, by various refining operations,  into more



than 100 different products.  The lighter  (lower density)  fuels are



gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuels.  These fuels are  characterized



by good vaporization and burning properties, low quantities of impur-



ities and good storage stability.  They account  for better than 50



percent of the liquid fuel market and are  utilized primarily  for



transportation.



     Fuel oils are heavier than the  fuels  used for transportation and



are required to meet  less stringent  performance and quality characteris-



tics.  These fuels are graded  from No.  1  to No.  6 with the higher num-



bered grades having higher viscosities  and lower purity requirements.



Grade Nos. 5 and 6 which require pre-heating facilities for pumping



and storing  the fuel, are used  in  large Industrial boilers and fur-



naces where  additional  costs for handling and  firing  facilities  can



be accomodated.  The  heating value of  liquid  fuels varies from 110,000



 to 150,000  BTU/gal, with the heavier fuels having the higher BTU con-



 tents.



 Gas



      The demand for gaseous  fuels  currently exceeds the available supply.



 Gas  is  a particularly popular fuel T>ocause price regulations make it



 cheaper than most other fuels   It is.easily stored,  shipped, and fired,

-------
42
                                       01
                                         •

                                        o
                                         0

                                         O
                                         C
                                         O
                                         u
                                         P,

                                         S
                                         CD


                                          0)

-------
                                    43




and it burns essentially poll-tie  free.




     The major gaseous fuel is natural gas, which ir an odorless,




colorless gas that accumulates in the upper part of oil or gas wells.




It consists chiefly of methane, and has a heating value between 1,000




and 1,100 BTU/cu. ft.




     Propane, and butane are produced in the process of refining petro-




leum.  Their heating values are considerably higher than natural gas.




Because they are easily liquidfied under pressure they are usually




"bottled" in steel cylinders or shipped in large bulk-type pressurized




tanks.  They are used either as standby supplies for users of natural




gas or as fuel for stoves, trucks, buses, etc.




     There  are also many types of manufactured gas which are produced by




heating various solid fuels under specifically controlled conditions.




These gasses are referred  to as coal gas, coke-oven gas (or coke),




producer gas, blast-furnace gas, water  gas,  etc.  The heating valve  of




these gases ranges from 100 to 750 BTU/cu. ft.  In many instances  they




are  used by the  industry producing them, because their heating  valve is




low, and it is not generally economical to compress them  for shipment or




storage.




Electrical  Generation




     The electric  utility  industry  is  both a supplier  of  energy to




consumers and  at the same  time,  is  itself  a  major  consumer  of  fuels.




In fact,  in 1970,  25 percent  of  the  energy used  in the U. S. was con-




sumed by  the  electric generating industry.   More than  half  of  this fuel




 input  came  from coal, with gas making up 24  percent and  oil 15 percent.




Nuclear energy supplied only 2 percent of  the industry's needs in 1970.




Although  nuclear generating plants  are expected  to supply 53 percent of




 the total utility load by 1>9'J,  the use of coal and oil is  also projected




 to increase during that time period, but at  a less rapid rate.

-------
                                  44
                             REFERENCES
 1.   Energy Resources Report, 2(10): 93, March 8, 1974.

 2.   Understanding the "national energy dilemma."  Washington, The
       Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1973.
       tables C and E.

 3.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Second report to Congress,
       resource recovery and source reduction.  Washington, U.S.
       Government Printing Office, 1974.  p.3.

 4.   Lowe, Robert A.  Energy conservation through improved solid waste
       management.  Washington, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
       April, 1974.  p. 11.  (In press.)

 5.   Calculation from data in "Problems and opportunities in management1
       of combustible solid waste."  Washington, International Research
       and Technology Corporation, October, 1972.  508p.

 6.   Fryliftg, G.R., ed.  Combustion engineering,  rev.ed. New York,
       Combustion Engineering, Inc., 1966.   p. 27-1.

 7.   Berry, E.E.  Municipal solid waste as a fuel in cement manufacture -
       a preliminary evaluation.  Ontario,  Canada, Ontario Research
       Foundation, April, 1972.  47p.

 8.   Lowe, R.A.  Energy recovery from waste.  Washington, U.S. Government
       Printing Office, 1973.  24p.

 9.   Summary report, city of Ames, Iowa, solid waste recovery system.
       Omaha, Gibbs, Hill, Durham & Richardson, Inc., February 6, 1974.
       20p.

10.   Press release.  Chicago, office of the Mayor, August 9, 1973.

11.   Liabilities into assets.  Environmental Science and Technology, 8(3):
       March, 1974.

12.   Press release.  St. Louis, Union Electric Company, February 28, 1974.

13.   Levy, S.J.  Pyrolysl- if municipal solid waste.  Washington, U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency.  Unpublished paper.

14.   Finney, C.S., and D. Gar&ett.  The flash pyrolysis of solid waste.
       Presented at Annual Meeting, American Institute of Chemical
       Enginerrs, Philadplphta, November 11, 1973.  20p.

-------
                                 45
15.   Solid waste disposal, resource recovery.   New York,  Environmental
       Systems Department, Union Carbide Corporation, undated.   8p.
                        4
16.   Methane recovery demonstration project.  Los Angeles, Los  Angeles
       Department of Waste and Power, 1974.  4p.

17.   Proposed research project, methane recovery from landfills.
       Newport Beach, California, NRG Technology, Inc., undated
       fact sheet.  3p.

18.   Wise, D.L., et al.  Fuel gas production from solid waste;  semi-
       annual progress report.  Cambridge, Massachusetts, Dynatech
       Corp., January 31, 1974.  147p.

19.   Steam electric power plants.  Paramus, N.J., Burns and Roe, Inc.,
       June, 1973.  p. IV-19.  (Draft report.)

20.   Thermal.  Nashville, Nashville Thermal Transfer Corp., undated.

21.   Beilski, E.T. and A. Ellenberger.  Landgard for solid wastes.
       In Proceedings; 1974 National Incinerator Conference, Miami,
       May 12-15, 1974.  American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
       p. 331-336.

22.  Thermal

23.  Garbage power pays off.   Business Week, No. 2288: 62F-63F, July 14, 1973.

24.  Methods for participation by the Florida Power  and Light Company
       with prospective bidders  for  the Dade County  solid waste disposal
       facilities.  Miami, Florida Power and Light Company, April 4, 1974.
       Draft statement.

25.  Decision makers  guide in solid  waste management.  Washington, U.S.
       Environmental  Protection  Agency, undated,  p. 116.   (In  press*)

26.  Sommerlad, Robert E.  European  experience,  solid  waste fueled
       central energy conversion plants.   In Proceedings; Solid waste -
       a source of energy, Nashville, October 11-12, 1973.  University
       of Tennessee.

27.  Burns and Roe.   Steam electric  power  plants,  p.  III-4.

28.  Chapman, R.A.,  and F.R.  Wocasek.   CPU-400  solid-waste-fired  gas
       turbine development.   In  Proceedings; 1974 National  Incinerator
       Conference, Miami,  May 12-15, 1974.  American Society of Mechanical
       Engineers,  p. 347-357.

-------
                                   46
29.  U.S. energy outlook.  Washington, Ntitiontil  Petroleum  Council,

       December, 1972.  p. 16.
                                               f

30.  U.S. energy outlook,  p. 273.

-------
                     SOLID-WASTE-AS-FUEL SYSTEMS
     Prepared solid waste  can be  used  as a low sulfur supplementary   \
fuel for existing stean or steam-electric coal or oil-fired boilers.
The concept is currently being demonstrated by the City  of St.  Louis,
Union Electric Company and the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.
     As a result of the St. Louis demonstration, many cities and
electric utilities have expressed significant interest in investigating
the local feasibility,of the concept.   Several systems are now in the
engineering design phase and others  are in the late planning stage.
     Several companies-are presently marketing turn-key, fixed-price
design and construction contracts for  solid-waste-as-fuel systems.
Some-of these companies are offering to finance, own, and operate
the facilities, and then charge the  users of the system  a fixed fee
per ton of waste.                            .",,'.,
     Although the system being demonstrated at St. Louis and the various
other systems being marketed throughout the country are  not identical,
they do have several steps in common:     •.          :,  .     -  v   ;
     Size Reduction                                "-..
          The particle size of the waste  is reduced to less than one  inch,
     Non-Combustible Separation                     ;  _..    ... ;. '.
          The glass, metals, and other dense materials are removed to
     upgrade the haat value of the fuel,  to reduce materials handling
     problens, and to recover materials for reuse where  economically
     and technically feasible.  Although  termed  "non-combustible," any
     material that will not burn completely in the boiler designated
     to receive the waste is usually removed by most systems.   In
     suspension-fired boilers, for example, where dense  materials
     quickly fall unburned to the bottom  of the  boiler,  dense  pieces
     of wcod, plastic, rubber and leather are removed  from the fuel
     in rcost systems although they -re technically combustible.

-------
                                 •2-
     Resi due Disposal.

          The non-combustible materials that are separated from the fuel
     fraction and not recovered for reuse must be landfilled.

     Waste Fuel Transportation
                                             -v,.
          The waste fuel can be transported pneumatically or by truck,
     barge, or rail.

     Firing

          Tfye waste fuel is usually pneumatically fired into the boiler.
     The boiler can be tangentially-fired, front-fired, opposed-ffred,
     cyclone-fired, or stoker fired.  Oil-fired boilers can readily
     accept waste fuel if they have adequate bottom ash and fly ash
     handling facilities.

     Air Pollution Control
          Tests must be run to assure acceptable air emissions.  If
     emissions are initially unacceptable, the air pollution control
     equipment must be upgraded, or the fuel preparation procedures
     must be modified to produce a higher quality fuel, or both.

     A list of companies currently offering turn-key, fixed-price design

and construction contracts follows.  The list may not be all inclusive

and does not imply EPA endorsement.  Any modifications, additions, or

subtractions to the list should be addressed to:

              Energy Recovery Program  (AW-563)        J        *:f
              Resource Recovery Division   •     •
            .  Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Washington, O.C.  20460                 „•"--. .

     A jurisdiction could also contract with a consulting engineering

firm and general contractor to design and build such systems.  The

presentation of a list of firms offering turn-key contracts is not

rreant to ircply EPA endorsement of the turn-key approach over the

consulting engineer, general construction contractor approach to design

and construction.  Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages;

the specific objectives and limitations  of each project will dictate

the proper approach.

-------
                       C'-!3-vl!ES GFFEPiriG TURN-KEY
                       SOLI:: .-r-.STE AS FUEL SYSTEMS
A-ericar Can Corroa.^y
  Arericclogy Division
  Mr. L. C. Bielic-'.i
  American Laoe
  Greenwich, Connecticut  C6330
  (203) 552-2111
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.
  Mr. Dennis Terry
  Market Pi rector
  5207 Hoi den Street
  Fairfax, Virginia  22030
  (703) 273-7676
Combustion Equipr.ent Associates
  Mr. A. H. Bellac
  555 Madison Avenue
  N!ew York, NY  10C22   .
  (212) 930-3700

Garrett Research ar.d Cevelocrr.ent, Inc.
  Mr. Theodore Jonas
  2009 North 14th Street
  Arlir.atcn, Virginia  222"1
  (703)~527-8555"
Peabody Gallon Corporation
  Dr. John Hayden
  Director, Market Developrent
  Environmental Systems
  835 Hope-Street
'  Stanford, Connecticut  C6907
  (203) 327-7000
Raytheon Corporation
  "r. Robert Schrceder
  Missile Systsrs Divisic-;
  Bedford, Massachusetts
  (517-5 272-9309  X472

-------
                     SOLID MASTE PYROLYSIS  SYSTEMS
     Pyrolysis is the thermal  decomposition  of  organic materials  in
an oxygen deficient environment.   It is  distinguished from  combustion
or incineration in that (1) the pyrolysis  reaction  is endothermic
(requires heat to drive the reaction) and  (2) the oxygen  deficient
atmosphere in the pyrolysis reactor inhibits the combustion of the
organic feed*material, thus producing combustible gases or  oil  that
can be used as a fuel.

     The high temperatures (1000 to 3000ฐF)  and lack of oxygen in a
pyrolysis reactor result in a  chemical  breakdown of the waste organic
materials into three components:   (1) a  gas  consisting primarily  of
hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide, and  carbon  dioxide,  (2) a "tar"
or "oil" that is liquid at room temperature  and includes  organic
chemicals such as acetic acid, acetone,  methanol, and  (3) a "char"
consisting of almost pure carbon plus any  inerts  (glass,  metals,
rock) that enter the process unit.   Residence time, temperature,  and
pressure can be controlled in  the pyrolysis  reactor to produce various
product combinations.

     A list of companies currently marketing or demonstrating pyrolysis
systems follows.  Brief cements about each  system  are also included.
The list may not be all-inclusive and doss not  imply EPA'endorsement.
Any modifications, additions,  or subtractions to tha list should  ba
addressed to:

               Energy Recovery Program (HM-563)
               Resource Recovery Division
               Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Washington, D.C.   20460

-------
                          PY?.QLY:-IS SYSTEMS
                            011 Pyrolysis
Garrett Research and Developrent, Inc.

     Dr. George Mall en
     P.O. Box 310
     UYerne, California 90017
     (714) 293-5000
     Development Status

       Pilot Plant.  A 4 ton per day experimental plant is operating in
       LaVerne, Cali forni a.

       Demonstration Plant.   San Diego County will be demonstrating a
       200 ton per day plant with support from the U.S.- Environmental
       Protection Agency; the plant is scheduled to be operating in
       late 1975.

     Process Characteristics

       Pre-processing.  Substantial pre-processing is required; nost
       non-combustibles must be removed and the waste must be shredded
       to a 14 mesh particle size (similar to vacuum cleaner dust).

       Reactor.  Flash pyrolysis reactor; the prepared waste is pyrolyzed
       in suspension in the reactor during the 1/2 second retention time.

       Gas Con den s ati o n.  The pyrolysis gases produced during the. reaction
       are condensed to an oil-like liquid.

       Auxiliary Fuel.  No auxiliary fuel is required to drive the
       py rolys i s reaction; the carbon char residue is .combusted to
       provide the required heat.

     Energy Products

       Oil.  About 1 barrel of cil will be produced from 1 ton of waste;
       the oil is sinvilar to No. 6 fuel oil, with about 3/4 the heat
       value of No. 6 oil; the oil can be usad as supplementary fuel
       for steam or steam-electric boilers.

-------
                                -2-


                            Gas Pyrolysis


            Environmental Systems ,  Inc.
Tor-rax Division

     John Z. Stoia
     641 Erie Avenue
     North Tonawanda, N.Y.  74102
     (716) 694-4400
   Develoorcent Status
     Detron s t ra t i on Plant.   A 75 ton per day  demonstration plant has. been
     operating intermittently since 1972 in  North Tonawanda,  New York,
     with U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency  support;  a final  report
     on the project should be available from EPA by  Fall, 1974.

   Process Characteristics

     Pre-processing.  Mo shredding is  required

     Reactor.  The reactor is a packed bed,  vertical shaft  furnace;
     wasie is fed into the top of the  reactor where  it is first dried,
     and then pyrolyzed as it slowly descends to the bottom of  the
     reactor.

     Auxiliary  Fuel.   Oil or gas is required to pre-heat process air
     to about T5CC-2GGO F; the air is  injected  at the bottom  of tha
     reactor which allows  the char to  combust and provide the heat to
     drive the pyrolysis reaction.

     Slagged Residue.   The heat generated also  melts the iretals and
     glass ->n the residue  forming a slag; the slag is tapped  into a
     water quench tank and forms a fine-grained sterile  residue.

   Energy Products

     Fuel Gas.  A combustible gas is produced with a lower  heating
     value of about 90 STU/ft3, about  one tenth the  heat value  of
     natural gas; although the gas  cannot be economically stored
     or transported because of its  low heat  value, it can be  used
     as supplementary  fuel gas in adjacent steam or  steam-electric
     boilers.

     Stsam.   Tha pyrolysis gases can be corpbusted on-sita and the hot
     exiaust cases can be  passed through a boiler to produce  steam.

-------
                                -3-
DEVCO Management Con-pany, Inc..

   Carl ton Thomas
   Director
   410 Park Avenue
   New York, New York 1002Z
   (212) 371-9105
   Development Status  *

     Pilot.. PI ant.  A 170 ton per day pilot plant is operating 1n Mew
     York City.

   Process Charactaristies
     Pre~proc.essing.  No shredding is required

     Reactor.  The reactor is a horizontal rotory kiln, similar to the
     kilns used in the cement industry.

     Auxiliary  Fuel.  No auxiliary  fuel is required; combustion of a
     portion of the char provides the heat, to drive the pyrolysis reac-
     tion.

   Energy Products

     Fuel Gas.  The low heat value corbustible gas produced carrot be
     economically stored or transported; it can be used as supplementary
     fuel in adjacent steam or stean-electric boilers.

     Steam.  The pyrolysis gases can be combusted on-site and the hot
     exhaust gases can be passed through a boiler to produce steam.

-------
                                -4-
Mansanto Enyiro-Chef.i Systems,,  Inc.

   Theodor F.  Buss
   Sales Manager
   IANDGARD Systems
   800 North Lindbergh Blvd.
   St. Louis,  Missouri 63166
   (3H) 694-2384
   Devel oprrent.Status

     Pilot Plant.   A 35 ton  per day pilot plant was tested  in St.  Louis
     and dismantled in late  1971.

     Demonstration Plant.  A 1000  ton per day demonstration plant  is
     under construction in Baltimore, Md., with U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency support; the plant should be operational  by
     early 1975.

   Process Characteristics

     Pre-processing.  Shredding is required to produce a 3-4" particle
     size.                                                        '

     Reactor.   The reactor is a horizontal rotory kiln, similar  to the.
     kilns used in the cerrent industry.

     Auxiliary . Fuel.  No. 2 fuel  oil is fired directly into the kiln
     to provide the neat to  drive  the pyrolysis reaction; combustion
     of a portion  of the char provides additional heat to the reactor.

   Energy Products

     Fuel Gas.  A  combustible gas  is produced with a lower  heating value
     of about  90 BTU/ft ,  about one tenth the heat value of natural gas;
     although  the  gas cannot be economically stored or transported
     because of its low heat value, it can be used as supplementary fuel
     gas in adjacent steam or steam-electric boilers.

     Steam. The pyrolysis gases can be combusted on-site and the  hot
     exhaust gases can be  passed through a boiler to produce steam.

     Electricity.   Tha steam produced can be used to generate electricity
     with a steam  turbine.

-------
                                 -5-
Pyrotek, Inc.

   George Moore
   Vice President
   1917 St. Andrews Place
   Santa Ana, California 92705
   (714) 835-3880
   Development Status

     Pilot Plant.  A.2 ton  per  day  pilot plant  is operating in Santa Ana,
     California'.

   Process Characteristics

     Pre-processing.  Shredding is  required  to  produce a 2-4" particle
     size.

     Reactor.  The shredded waste passes continuously through the reactor
     on a r.oving grate; heat  to drive  tha  pyrolysis reaction is supplied
     indirectly through the walls of the reactor

     Auxiliary  Fuel.  No auxiliary fuel  is  required.

   Energy Products

     Fuel Gas.  A combustible gas is produced with a heating value of
     about 375 BTU/ft3, about one third the  heat value of natural gas;
     although the gas cannot  be economically  stored or transported
     because of its low heat  value, it can be used as supplementary
     fuel gas in adjacent steam or  steam-electric boilers.

-------
                                 -6-
Unlon Carbide Corporation

   Linde Division

     Dick Paul
     270 Park Avenue
     Mew York,  New York 1C017
     (212) 551-2077
   Development Status  .

     Pilot J>lant.   A 5 ton per day  pilot plant 1s operating  in Tarreytown,
     New York.

     Perronstrati on Plant.   A 200  ton per day demonstration plant  in South
     Charleston,  West Virginia began operation in April, 1974; the project
     1s a test facility,  rather than a commercially operated facility.

   Process Characteristi cs

     Pre-processing.  No  shredding  is required.
                                             ;
     Reactor.   The reactor is a packed bed, vertical shaft furnace; waste
     is fed "into  the top  of the reactor where it is first dried,  and then
     pyrolyzed as  it slowly descends to the bottom of the reactor; pure
     oxygen is injected into the  bottom of the reactor to allow the char
     residue to ccrbust;  the haat generated drives the pyrolysis  reaction.

  '   Slagged Residue.  The heat generated also melts the netals and class
     in the residue forcing a slag; the slag is tapped into  a water quench
     tank and fonts a fine-grained  sterile residue.

   Energy Products

     Fuel Gas. A  combustible gas is produced with a lower heating value
    .of about 255  BTU/ft^, about  one third the heat value of natural gas;
     although the  gas cannot be economically stored or transported
     because of its low heat value, it can be used as supplementary fuel
     in adjacent  steam or steam-electric boilers.

     Electricity.   The pyrolysis  gases can be corrbusted on-site and the
     hot expanding gases  can be passed through a gas turbine to generate
     electricity.

     Steam.   The  pyrolysis Gases  can be combusted on-site and the hot
     exhaus.t gases can be  passed  through a boiler to produce steam.

-------
                  PVROLYSIS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
                            Steven J.  ! evy

Introduction
Pyrolysis is the physical and chemical decomposition of organic matter
brought about by the action of heat, in the absence of oxygen.  In the
last several years, a great deal of interest has been generated in
applying this process to municipal solid waste.  Many systems have been
developed, and while most utilize pyrolysis as only one reaction 1n a
multi-step process, they are commonly referred to as "pyrolysis processes."

The primary objective in developing pyrolysis systems for municipal solid
waste has been to reduce the volume of wastes requiring disposal in a
manner less environmentally damaging than "conventional" incineration.
A second benefit, common to most systems, has been the conversion of the
organic portion of the solid waste into a useable energy form.  This
energy will vary according to the operating characteristics of the parti-
cular system.  Organic materials can be broken down into compounds which
are either gases, liquids, or solids at room temperature.  In some systems,
the recovered fuels are of sufficient quality that they can be substituted
for fossil fuels in existing off-site facilities.  In other systems, the
fuel is of lower quality, and the cost of transporting it cannot be
justified.   In such cases, th?  fuel can be used directly to produce
electricity  or steam.

-------
                                   2
There are about 10 to 12 different pyrolysls systems under development
at this time.  In this paper detailed discussions will  be presented on
three systems, each of which 1s currently undergoing, evaluation of a
commercial size unit.  Those three systems are the "Landgard" developed
by Monsanto, the "Purox" developed by Union Carbide and the Garrett
Research and Development Company's "Flash Pyrolysls" system.

Why Pyrolysls?
Normal combustion, as 1n conventional incineration, requires the presence
of a quantity of oxygen sufficient to allow for the complete oxidation
of the organic matter.  This is provided by pumping air into the furnace.
Using cellulose (C^H^QOg) to represent the organic material, combustion
occurs as the oxygen  (02) reacts with the cellulose forming carbon
dioxide  (C02) and water (HgO), and releasing heat.  The chemical equation
for this reaction is  as follows:
                (1)   C6H1Q05 + 60^>6C02 4- 5H20 + heat
 In order to  remove the heat from the combustion chamber without damaging
 the  incinerator, more air 1s pumped through the incinerator than is
 theoretically needed  to complete the reaction.  This excess air, which
 can  be 400 percent or more of the exact or stoiciometric  requirement,
 increases the velocity of the gas stream through the solid waste.   A1r
 pollution control equipment is heavily taxed because:  1) it must  handle
 a much larger volume  of gases; and  2) the gases carry higher particulate
 loadings because they are blown through the solid waste at a much  higher,
more  turbulent  velocity.  J'rreasingly stringent air pollution  standards

-------
                                   3
have tjreally Increased I he tost of air pollution control  systems.   As a
result, incineration of solid waste has generally become economically
prohibitive.2
Pyrolysis, unlike incineration, is an endothermic reaction.  Heat must
be applied to the solid waste in order to distill off volatile compounds.
During pyrolysis, heat causes carbon (C) to react with water (HgO) and
carbon dioxide (C02) to produce carbon monoxide (CO):
                     (2)  C + H20 + heat-+H2 + CO
                     (3)  C + C02 + heat—*2CO

This typifies what happens 1n the pyrolysis reaction.  In actuality,
cellulose breaks down into new organic compounds which have simpler
molecular structures than the cellulose.  Although it is not possible
to write a  typical equation for this reaction, the predominant products
are  hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, carbon dioxide, and various
hydrocarbons.  Factors  such as time, temperature, pressure and the
presence of catalysts determine what products are formed.
Because heat is  needed  to complete  the  pyrolysis reaction  there is some
logic  in combining pyrolysis  zones  and  combustion zones within the same
system.   In this way, heat liberated by combustion of a portion of the
organic material can  be used  to drive the pyrolysis  reaction, thereby
eliminating the  need  to supply an external  energy source.. Carbon dioxide
formed in the combustion zone is  partially converted back  to carbon
monoxide  in the  pyrolysis  zone (see equation  3).  Many  systems currently
under  development  follow this approach.

-------
Monsanto "Landgard" System
Of the systems currently under development, the "Landgard" system developed
by Monsanto is the furthest advanced.  This is not suprising, however,
because it is the simplest of the systems, making no effort to separate the
pyrolysis and combustion reactions.  Refuse is burned in a rotary kiln
                                                      o
with 40 percent of the stoichiometric air requirement.   Additional heat
is provided by an oil burner to complete the pyrolysis reaction.  It
could be said that this 3s a starved air incinerator, rather than a
pyrolysis system; nonetheless, a combustible gas resulting from the distil-
lation of the organci material is produced.

The development of this system was begun by Monsanto in 1969 with the
testing of 0.3 ton per day pilot plant in Dayton, Ohio.   Shortly there-
after, a 35 ton per day prototype plant was put into operation in
St. Louis County, Missouri.  Data from this unit was used by Monsanto to
design  the 1,000  ton  per day  (TPD) facility which is currently under
construction  in Baltimore, Maryland.
Construction on the Baltimore plant, which is being supported by a $6
million grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, began in
June, 1973 and is scheduled for completion in August, 1974.

One reason why this facility will be constructed so quickly is that it is
being purchased by Baltimore under a "turn-key" contract.   Monsanto is
responsible for the complete design, construction and shakedown of the
plant.  The contract  calls for Monsanto to turn over to Baltimore a
complete, operational facility.  Additionally, the contract provides for

-------
                                   5
up to 4 million dollars 1n performance penalties if the plant  falls to
meet any of the following standards:

     'all existing federal, state and local air pollution regulations
     'plant capacity will average a minimum of 85 percent of design
      capacity for an identified 60 day period
     'putrescible ccntent of residue will be less than 0.2 percent
The plant is being built on a five acre industrial site about one mile
south of the central business district.  A schematic diagram of the
plant is shown in figure 1.  Incoming mixed municipal solid waste will be
shredded to a four inch particle size in one of two 50 ton per hour
shredders.  Shredded waste will be stored  in a live bottom bin having a
capacity of 2,000 tons.  This will allow the receiving and shredding
operation to be fairly independent of minor downstream process inter-
ruptions, and will allow the pyrolysis kiln to operate 24 hours a day,
7 days a week.  Twin rams will  feed the single pyrolysis vessel - a
refractory lined horizontal rotary  kiln with a nominal capacity of 46
tons per hour.  The kiln, 18 feet in diameter and 100 feet long, rotates
at  2 revolutions per minute.

Heat required  to accomplish the pyrolysis  is provided by burning a portion
of  the solid waste  using 40 percent of the theoretically required air.
Number 2 heating oil,  at the rate of 7.9 gal/ton  of solid waste, is also
burned in  the  kiln.  Off-gases  flow in the kiln counter-current to the
flow of  solid  waste, and exit  the  kiln at  about 1,200ฐ  F.

-------
 'fl
 a
T)
 o
 tn
 04

'o

 c

 g

l*-4
 o

 CO
•H
 01
 V

5
•H


 O
 O
 4J
 en

 (0
 o
 o
 a;
 4J
 tn
 5

 ซJ
 tn


 I

 Q)
  2

-------
                                    7
When the combustion/pyrolysis gases reach the system's afterburner (gas
purifier), additional air is introduced allowing these gases, which have
a heat content of 75-100 British thermal units per standard cubic foot
(BTU/scf), to burn to completion.  Modular waste heat boilers (heat
exchangers) are used to recover 200,000 pounds of steam per hour (Ibs/hr).
Wet scrubbers, a mist eliminator and a reheater treat the exhaust gas.
Recovered steam will be sold under a 5 year contract to the Baltimore
Gas and Electric Company for utility distribution.  The contract price
is a function of the price of No. 6 heating oil.  At the time the con-
tract was signed heating oil cost the utility $3.70 per barrel, and the
steam price was set at $0.81 per 1,000 pounds.  Current oil prices will
cause the price of the steam to rise substantially.  The full 200,000
pounds will be accepted by the utility 10 months of the year but only
100,000 Ibs/hr will  be accepted during July and August.
In  addition to steam recovery, ferrous metals (70 TPD) and glassy aggre-
gate  (170 TPD) will  be recovered from the residue.  The city anticipates
using the aggregate  in bituminous  paving mixes.  The  total cost of  the
Baltimore plant will be  $15,852,000.  This  includes the $14,742,000
turn-key  contract  price  plus  land,  offsite  development and project  admin-
 istration during  construction.   Total annual  operating and maintenance
 costs  based on the 1972  contract price  and  estimates  made  at that time were
 as  follows:
      Amortization  (15 years  8 5%)           $1,525,000
      Fuel                                     276,000

-------
                                   8
     Electricity                           329,000
     Water                                  95,000
     Manpower                              315,000
     Maintenance                           570,000
     Char Disposal                           57.000
                   Total 0 & M Costs    $3,167,000

Plant revenues were estimated to be:
     Steam (1.365 billion Ibs at $0.81
            per 1,000 Ibs)              $1,105,000
     Ferrous Metal (21,700 tons at
                    $6.31 per ton)         137,000
     Glassy Aggregate (52,700 tons at
                       $2.00 per ton)      105.000
                       Total Revenues   $1,347,000
Net Operating Costs would thus be:
     Total 0 & M                        $3,167,000
     Revenues                           -1.347.000
                 Net Operating Costs    $1,820,000

Plant throughput, based on 85 percent availability, will be 310,000 tons
per year.  This resulted in an estimated net cost of $5.87 per  ton of
throughput.

Project Engineers are now estimating substantially higher revenues for
both the  steam and ferrous metals.  Although operating costs are also
expected  to rise, the net operating  cost per ton  is expected  to drop
substantially.

-------
Gas Production
The Linde Division of the Union Carbide Corporation has developed a high
temperature pyrolysis reactor which produces a fuel gas that can be
recovered for off-site use.   Original pilot plant work was done in
Tarrytown, New York, on a 10-foot-tall packed-column retort having a
capacity of 5 tons per day.  Union Carbide is currently building a 200
ton per day test facility at South Charleston, West Virginia.  This facil-
ity is scheduled to go into operation 1n 1974 for the purpose of con-
firming engineering scale-up criteria, obtaining operating data and
experience on mixed municipal solid waste, and confirming projected
economics.
Figure 2 depicts the flow diagram of the Union Carbide process.  The key
element to the process, called the "Purox" system, is a vertical shaft
furnace.  Solid waste is fed into the top of the furnace through an inter-
locking feeder.  Oxygen, at  the rate of 0.2 ton per ton of solid waste  is
blown into the base of the solid waste column, where it reacts with char,
the solid residue remaining  after the pyrolysis of the solid waste.  The
resultant combustion  is at a high enough temperature to melt or  slag any
noncombustible materials in  the residue.  This molten metal and  glass
drains continuously  into a water quench tank where it forms a hard,
granular material.
The hot gases formed  by reaction of the oxygen and char rise up  through
the descending solid  waste providing  the heat needed to pyrolyze the
solid waste.  No external  fuel supply is needed to drive the pyrolysis

-------
                            10
        REFUSE
      FEED HOPPER

          SEAL—

          FEEDLOCK
           SEAL
           SHAFT
          FURNACE
       OXYGEN
COMBUSTION
   ZONE
               MOLTEN
              MATERIAL

        WATER QUENCH
            FUEL GAS
            PRODUCT
GAS CLEANING
   TRAIN
                                             RECYCLE
      WASTE WATER
  GRANULAR
   RESIDUE
Figure 2. The key element of the Union Carbide process is a vertical shaft furnace.

-------
                                   11
reaction.  In the upper portion of the furnace the gas is cooled further
as it dries the incoming solid waste.   This lowers the temperature of the
gas exhausting from the furnace to about 200ฐ F.   The exhaust gas contains
considerable water vapor, some oil mist and minor amounts of undesirable
constituents.  These components are removed in a  gas cleaning train con-
sisting of an electrostatic precipitator, an acid absortion column and
a condenser.

The gas resulting from the pyrolysis reaction is  a clean burning fuel
comparable to natural gas in combustion characteristics, but with a
heating value of about 300 BTU/cubic foot.  It is essentially free of
sulfur compounds and nitrogen oxides.  This fuel  burns at approximately
the same temperature as natural gas.  The volume of combustion air
needed per million BTU's is about 80 percent of that needed for natural
gas.  The volume of combustion products is about 90 percent of natural
gas.  Because these characteristics are so close to natural gas, it should
be possible  to substitute this gas for natural gas in an existing facility.
The only plant modification would entail enlarging the burner nozzle
because  a larger volume  of gas must be introduced into the furnace 1n
order to obtain the same heat  input.
The  limitation on  use  of this  gas  is  the extra cost of compressing 1t
for  storage  and shipment.  Energy consumption per million BTU's  to com-
press it will be  3.1 times greater than for natural gas.  As a  result,
Union Carbide engineers  feel  that markets  for this gas should be no more
than  1 or  2  miles  from the producing  facility and that only  short term
storage  should be  contemplated.

-------
                                   12
The reason that the "Purox" gas can be recovered for off-site use is that.
by using oxygen instead of air, the combustible gas product is not diluted
by the 79 percent inert nitrogen present 1n air.  To do this requires
the use of an oxygen supply which can be relatively costly for small
scale plants.
Economics for a full scale Purox system are speculative at this stage of
development.  However, based on currently available information, Union
Carbide has projected the net cost of disposal for this process to be
about $4.50 per ton for a 1,000 ton per day plant.  The basis for this is
a capital cost of $14 million, exclusive of land or site specific design
costs.  The plant would have three 350 ton per day modules served by one
oxygen plant.  Amortization and operating costs would amount to about
$3 million per year.  Revenues from the sale of gas at 75 cents per
million BTU's  (and a gas yield of 7 million BTU's per ton of solid waste)
would be  about $1.6 million.  Plant throughput on the basis of 85 percent
availability would be 310,000 tons per year.
Oil Pyrolysis
The Garrett Research and Development Company has the only "true" solid
waste pyrolysis system to reach full scale development.  This system,
referred  to as "flash pyrolysis," produces an oil-like-liquid which
can be used as a substitute for No. 6 fuel oil.   The concept was origi-
nally tested in a  small laboratory unit.  Subsequently, a four ton  per
day pilot plant was built on Garrett's property in LaVerne, California.
Successful pilot plant performance has led San Diego County, California

-------
                                   13
to build a 200 ton per day demonstration plant with financial  support
from the Environmental Protection Agency.  Construction is scheduled to
begin in December, 1974.
In order for this flash pyrolysis process to work efficiently, most non-
organic material must be removed and the organic material must be reduced
to small, dry particles.  The process is schematically depicted in Figure
3.  Incoming municipal solid waste will first be shredded to a particle
size of 2 inches or less.  An air classifier will then separate the light,
organic fraction from the heavy, inorganic fraction.  The "lights" will
then be dried to a moisture content of  3 percent.  A screen will be used
to remove additional  inorganics and the remaining material will be shredded
again to a particle size of -14 mesh.   Ferrous metals are magnetically
reclaimed from  the classifier rejects and a sand-sized, mixed-color,
glass cullet of +99.7 percent purity is recovered from the remaining
inorganics by selective crushing and screening, followed  by froth flotation.
The pyrolysis reaction  takes place  in a transport reactor 30  feet tall,
and 8  Inches  in diameter.  The  fine shredded material  is  carried into  the
base of the reactor where  it is mixed with  burning char.  Both materials
are carried Into  the  system by  spent combustion gases  from an auxiliary
char burner.   In  the  reactor, the  hot,  glowing char and  solid waste  are
rapidly mixed as  the  suspension passes  upward  under turbulent flow
conditions.   Reactor  temperature  is maintained, without  any auxiliary
 * The material  mu-st pass through a screen having 14 openings per inch.

-------
                                   14
AS-RECEIVED
   REFUSE   I
      \
       PRWARY
       SHREDDER
UNRECOVERED
   SOLIDS
TO DISPOSAL
  -8 WT.%
                       >• t—
                       ง2
                       ฃ"=
                                              I
                               V
 INORGANIC
PROCESSING
SUBSYSTEM
                      I        T
                    CLEAN    MAGNETIC
                    GLASS    METALS
                                                                       GAS TO
                                                                       PURIFICATION
                                                                       AND RECYCLE
        WATER TO
        PURIFICATION
        AND DISPOSAL
                              CHAR
                           9000 BTU/LB.
  OIL
4.8 MM BTU/BBI
         Figure 3.  The  "Garrett" process produces  an oil-like  liquid fuel from

         solid waste,

-------
                                    15
fuel, at about 900ฐ F.  Because the pyrolysls reaction is so rapid, the
gaseous products formed are not exposed to the high temperatures long
enough for them to thermally degrade.  The result is, that when the
gases are cooled down to ambient temperatures the compounds formed are
organic liquids rather than gases.

After removal of char by cyclones,  the hot gases pass to a standard oil
recovery collection train.  Hot char is either recirculated to the
pyrolysis reactor after being reheated in the char heater, or is quenched
for disposal.

The hot, char-free gaseous products leaving the reactor cyclone will be
rapidly cooled from about 900ฐ F by a venturi quench system using recir-
culated product oil.   In this way, the valuable liquid products, at the
rate of about 1 barrel (42 gallons) per ton of solid waste, are recovered
before thermal cracking can occur.  The outlet gas is further cooled to
about  110ฐ F  in a  packed bed scrubber before  being returned to the process.
Condensed water frorr  the decomposition of cellulosic compounds  amounts
to about 13 percent of the pyrolysis feed.  This water is cooled in a
separate heat exchanger, and a portion 1s then returned  to the scrubber
for  cooling purposes.
The  liquid fuel obtained from  the  pyrolysis of municipal  refuse differs
in many  important  aspects  from fuel oil derived from petroleum.  It is
a complex, highly  oxygenated organic fluid,  the properties of which are
compared with those  of a  typical No. 6 fuel oil in Table 1.  At 0.1 to
0.3  percent  by  weight, the sulfur  content is  a good  deal  lower  than even

-------


16
1AIU.E 1
TYPICAL PROPERTIES OF NO. 6 FUEL
AND PYROLYTIC OIL*

Carbon (percent by weight)
Hydrogen (percent by weight)
Sulfur (percent by weight)
Chlorine (percent by weight)
Ash (percent by weight)
Oxygen6" (Percent b* wel'9ht)
Heating Value (BTU/pound)
Specific Gravity
Density (Ib/gallon)
Volumetric Heating Value
(BTU/gallon)
Pour Point (ฐF)
Flash Point (ฐF)
Pumping Temperature (ฐF)
Atomization Temperature (ฐF)
Viscosity (SSU@190ฐF)
No. 6
85.7
10.5
0.5 - 3.5
-
0.5
J 2.0
18,200
0.98
8.18
148,840
65 - 85
150
115
220
90 - 250


OIL
Pyrolytic Oil
57.5
7.6
0.1 - 0.3
0.3
0.2 - 0.4
0.9
33.4
10,500
1.30
10.85
113,910
90
133
160
240
1,000
*Source:  Finney, .C.S., and D. Garrett.  The flash pyrolysis  of solid
 waste.  Presented at Annual Meeting, American Institute of Chemical
 Engineering, Philadelphia, November 11, 1973, p.  186.

-------
                                   17
the best residual oils.  However, nearly twice the weUjht  ot  this oil  Is
needed to obtain an equivalent amount of energy as number 6 fuel  oil.

Because it is lower in both carbon and hydrogen, and contains much more
oxygen, the average heating value is about 10,500 BTU per pound compared
with 18,200 BTU per pound for a typical No. 6.  However, fuel oils are
generally sold on a volume basis, and since the specific gravities of
pyrolytlc oil and No. 6 are 1.30 and 0.98 respectively, a comparison of
heating values is much more favorable to the former when expressed on a
volumetric basis.  As Table 1 shows, a gallon (or barrel) of oil derived
from the pyrolysls of municipal waste contains about 76 percent of the
heat energy available from No. 6.

Pyrolytic oil is more viscous than a typical residual.  However, its
viscosity falls off more rapidly with temperature than does that of No. 6
fuel oil.  Hence, although it must be stored and pumped at higher tempera-
tures  than are needed  to handle  heavy fuel oil, it can be atomized and
burned quite well at 240ฐ F.  This is only about 20ฐ F higher than the
atomization temperature for electric utility fuel oils.
It was found that pyrolytic oil  from municipal waste could be blended
                                  o
with  several different No. 6  oils.   There was  very little mutual solubility
of the two components, and over  a period of hours the heavier pyrolytic
oil would  settle out  from  the mixture.  Successful combustion trials were
carried out, however,  at the  Kreisinger Development Laboratory of Com-
bustion Engineering,  Inc., in Windsor, Connecticut, with  blends  containing
50 percent and  25 percent  by  volume  of pyrolytic  oil with a  No.  6 from

-------
                                   18
an Alaskan crude.  Combustion tmjineer ing's formal  report, on the work
•>tdtos that:   "Pilot-scale laboratory tests Indicate thai pyrolyllc oil
or blends of pyrolytic oil with No. 6 fuel  oil can  be successfully
burned in a utility boiler with a properly designed fuels handling and
atomization system.  Ignition stability with the pyrolytic oil and with
the blends was equal to that obtained with No. 6 alone; and stack emissions
when burning pyrolytic oil or blends indicated negligible amounts of
                                                          Q
unburned carbon at excess oxygen levels over two percent.'

Two precautions must be taken in the utilization of this new fuel.  It
tends to be thermally sensitive about 200ฐF, and if held at such tempera-
tures for extended periods, will undergo changes which adversely affect
viscosity.  It is also somewhat corrosive to mild steel at 200ฐ F, although
no attack upon 304 or 316 stainless coupons could be observed.  Blending
with No. 6 counteracts both its mildly acidic properties and its tendency
to suffer with excessive  heating.
As a result of these findings San Diego Gas and Electric Company has
contracted to purchase the oil from the county.  Based on the utility's
current cost of  $7.00 per barrel for No. 6 oil, the pyrolysis fuel is
anticipated to have a value of $4.33 per barrel, delivered.  This lower
price accounts for the lower heat value per barrel, the additional
handling costs,  and transportation.  Total annual operating and main-
tenance costs estimated on the basis of 1974 dollars are as follows:
     Amortization  (15 years @ 5% of $6,343,200)      611,103
     Utilities                                        50,925

-------
                                   19
     Manpower                                        228,618
     Maintenance                                     147,000
     Misc.  Costs                                      26,775
                               Total  0 & M Costs  $1,064,421
Plant revenues are estimated to be:
     Oil (62,000 bbl at $4.33)                       268,460
     Ferrous Metal (4,340 tons at $18.20/ton)         78,488
     Glass  (3,317 tons at $6.40)                     21.228
                                Total Revenues    $  368,176
Net Operating Costs will thus be:
     Total Costs                                   1,064,421
     Revenues                                        368,176
                                Net Operating Cost $ 696,245
 Plant  throughput,  based on  85 percent availability will be  62,000
 tons per year.   This  results  in  a  net cost of $11.23  per  ton.
 Other  Systems
 A number of other systems are currently being evaluated at  the  pilot
 plant  scale.   Several  are being  marketed as full  size plants, but  at  this
 time no commercial  units are  known to have been sold.   The  other systems
 are as follows:
      •Battelle Northwest -  has developed a vertical cylindrical reactor
       in which a packed column of  solid waste is progressively  dried,
       pyrolyzed and finally oxidized by an air/steam  mixture.    The
       physical  arrangement  is quite  similar to the Union  Carbide reactor
       but operating temperatures are much lower (1600ฐ F).   As  a result,
       reaction times are considerably longer.  A pilot plant in Richland,
       Wash., has been operated at  3  to 5 tons per day.

-------
                              20
'DEVCO Management,  Inc.  -  has  developed  a  rotary  kiln  pyrolysis
 system which 1s  quite similar to the Monsanto  process.   A 7  ton
 per hour pilot plant is currently being tested in Queens, New York.
'Kemp Converter - This is  an indirectly  heated  horizontal  pyrolysis
 chamber.  Natural  gas Is  burned 1n a combustion  chamber and  its
 radiant energy 1s passed  through the reactor's walls  to Indirectly
 heat the organic matter.
'Lantz Converter - This is a batch-fed,  sealed  cylindrical unit
 which is indirectly fired by a gas-fired  furnace.  Temperatures
 Inside the reactor reach 900ฐ to 1,200ฐ F.   In this system,  as
 well as the Kemp converter special precautions must be taken to
 insure that no air leaks into the pyrolysis reactor.
•Pyrotek, Inc. - has also developed an Indirectly fired reactor.  In
 this unit refuse 1s continuously fed through the reactor on a moving
 grate.  Heat from a separate combustion chamber adjacent to the
 reactor drives the process.  Although the present pilot plant 1n
 Santa Ana,  California  is electrically heated, the developers of this system
 expect to use gas produced by the process as the fuel source.
•Torrax - The Torrax system, 1s very similar to the Union Carbide
 process.  The major difference is the use of air preheated to 2000ฐ F,
 instead of  oxygen to achieve the higher combustion temperatures in
 the  slagging zone.  This preheated air is provided by burning
 natural gas 1n a silica-carbide-tube a1r-to-a1r heat exchanger.
 A 75 ton per day pilot plant has been evaluated 1n Erie County,
 New  York.

-------
                                  21
     'University of West Virginia  -  Dr.  Richard  Bailie  has done extensive
      research work on  the  development of  fluidized  bed incinerators.  As
      an outgrowth of this  he has  developed  a  concept for a two bed
      pyrolysis system.    In one  bed normal combustion takes  place.   Hot
      sand from this bed is then transferred to  the  second bed where  it's
      heat is used to pyrolyze incoming  refuse.   After  the sand has given
      up its heat it is returned to  the  first  bed to be heated again.
     'Urban Research and Development Corp. - has experimented  with
      several pilot plants  of the  vertical shaft slagging  furnace type.
      Like the Torrax system, this system uses air preheated to 2,200ฐ F
      to reach slagging temperatures.  Pilot plant testing has been
      going on intermittently in East Grandby, Conn, since 1968.
Conclusion
The need for better solid waste disposal systems and the need  for new
sources of energy has stimulated a great deal  of interest in the appli-
cation of pyrolysis to solid waste.   Several systems show a great deal
of promise.  Hopefully, by 1980 municipalities will be implementing
similar systems on a wide scale.

The ultimate objective  in developing pyrolysis should be to produce a
storable, transportable fuel that can be utilized as a fossil  fuel sub-
stitute without special handling facilities.  Then municipalities will
be able to  readily market  the end products of their system and will not
have  to adapt  the location or design of their system to a specific
market.

-------
                                   22
The Union Carbide system and the Garrett system,  which were described in
this paper, offer the most promise of reaching this objective.   The gas
produced in the Union Carbide system can be used in conventional furnaces
with only the slightest modification.  Additionally, short term storage
and limited transportation 1s feasible.  The Garrett system's liquid fuel
can be easily transported but can only be stored for limited periods of
time (about 2 weeks).  Special facilities and procedures are necessary
when using this fuel, primarily because of It's correslve properties.
Although the Monsanto system does not produce a fuel, It's energy
recovery potential is significant, if it can be located near a customer
for the steam.  Also, the fact that a full size 1,000 ton per day plant
will soon be in operation makes it the furthest developed of the pyrolysis
alternatives.

-------
                                  23
                              REFERENCES
 1.  Achlnger, W.C. and I.E. Daniels.  An evaluation of seven Incin-
      erators.   In proceedings; 1970 National Incinerator Conference,
      Cincinnati, May lf-20, 1970.  American Society of Mechanical
      Engineers, p. 48.

 2.  Decision-makers guide  in solid waste management.  Washington,
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, updated.  P. 116.  (In
      press.)

 3.  Personal communication.  F.A. Shaffstall, Monsanto, Enviro-Chem
      Systems,  Inc., to J.R. Holloway, Solid Waste Management Office,
      January 3, 1973.

 4.  Development of Landgard system for disposal of municipal solid
      waste, 1973.  Unpublished paper.

 5.  Contract for a pyrolysis resource recovery solid waste management
      system between the City  of  Baltimore, Maryland and Monsanto
      Enviro-Chem Systems, Inc.,  October  1972, 23p.

 6.  Solid  waste disposal,  resource recovery.  New York, Environmental
      Systems Department,  Union Carbide Corp., undated, 8p.

 7.  Bauer, H.F., etal.  Technical report  on  the Garrett pyrolysis
      process for recycling municipal solid  waste.  LaVerne, California,
      Garrett Research  and Development Company, Inc., December 29, 1972,
      65p.  (Unpublished report.)

 8.  Borio, R.W., Combustion and handling  properties of Garrett's
      pyrolytic oil.  Windsor, Connecticut,  Kreisinger Developement
      Laboratory (Dept.  683),  December 4, 1972, 19p.

 9.  Borio, Combustion  properties  of  Garrett's oil,  p. 1.

10.  Hammond,  V.L.,  Pyrolysis-lncinerator  process for  solid waste  disposal.
       Richland, Washington,  Battelle Pacific Northwest  Laboratories,
       December  1972,  l<|p.

11.   Bailie,  R.C.,  High%nergy  gas from  refuse using fluidized beds.
       Morgantown,  W.  Vtrginia, August 1,  1972.

-------
                          XI
                     PRE3S:iT  CGITDI'L'ION
               Of  SOLID ./A3TS3  IIAITACSl
                      TSUTOL'IU  PUZUDA
                    TADAYUKI 1,'IORISHITA
                       AUGUST,  1974
DEPART:IS:TT OF WATER SUPPLY AND E^TVIROI-TI-IBITTAL SANITATION,
              E;Tvmoฃ:.:SiiTAi HEALTH BURJAU,
            MINISTRY OP HEALTH A2HD V/ELFAHE  of
                           JAPA1J
                  <"; - -v^'i-'J, j.  Oirrore.aeo  .n Solid  .'i.c"te

-------
      PRESENT CO:DTTION OF SOLID WASTES LIAHAGELIBJIT

1.  Introduction
      Hitherto in Japan, flourishing production activity
and large-scale consumption have occurred within a  small
national territory; and as a consequence, there have
been growing and diversified waste discharges from
places of production, circulation of money, and consump-
tion.  Hence, in large cities, and in particular, begin-
ning with Tokyo, waste management reached a serious
state of affairs, which was called "the refuse war."
      In order to cope with this new kind of situation
in society, on the one hand, the old "Public Cleansing
Law" was completely revised in 1970, and the new "Waste
Disposal and Public Cleansing Law" has been enforced
since September, 1370.
2.,  The Disposal of Refuse
      In the area of refuse disposal, the total volume
of refuse discharged has increased annually, so that  by
the end o.~ 1972.  ::i= TotLil clisclii'-r^c TO lira o hc.d reached
about 92,OX> to-ir,  ::iily; i;h-.it iyr each Japanese dis-
                   -.-r?,.:s daily.

-------
        Since it was planned to dispose of this refuse
"by incineration, and also to detoxify r stabilize, and
reduce its quantity, there were existing plans for com-
pleting facilities with the "basic aim of incineration
and landfill with the remaining ashes.  However, in.
1972 the rate of disposal by incineration was about 56$,
that of landfill, 41$, and that of composting and other-
methods, 3$,
        For the purposes of waste management , it is
planned to complete facilities to incinerate 90$ of all
conbustibles (which make up 83$ of all refuse dis-
charged) in the average 1200 grams per person volume to
be collected daily by the end of 1975.  Besides these
incineration facilities, facilities for large refuse,
(pulverizers and compressing machines) are planned ป
3.  Problems to be Confronted in the Disposal of Refuse
   (1). Increasing Volume of Refuse
                 ซr
        3>ae to the rise in standard of living since
        I960, and the accompanying changes in life
        styles, etc., the volume of refuse collected
        by municipalities -i~3 grovoi annually at an
        o-vcrc-jj'e race of ..bout; II1,;'.  I.:"orcover, i
t is

-------
                      -3-
     thought that  the  decline  of  resources reclama-

     tion collection systems clue  to  the decline  of

     private waste collection  services, etc.,  also

     contributes to the  increasing volune of refuse.
                                           ;
(2).  Change in the Nature of  Refuse

        The level  of plastic nixed in with our na-

     tion1 s refuse is abnormally  high, and there are

     cities where  it reaches 10$  (wetbase, water

     content about 50^;  1972). It is thought  that

     a cause of the high level of plastic mixed  in

     the refuse in Japan is due to such phenomena

     as its optimal use  in self-service sales  pack-

     aging products.

        Consequently,  this, combined with a rise in

     the level of  combustible  materials such as  pa-

     per, also bring about such problems as the  in-

     creasing volume of  heat  generated by refuse, a

     lov/ering of incineration capacity in incinera-

     tors,- damage  to furnaces  by  hydrogen chloride

     gas, v/orcening in gas discharge end drainage,

     end problems in "base otabili-jy  in landfill  dis-

     posal.

-------
                  -4-
    As countemeasures, in some cities measures
are planned to make refuse  incineration facili-
ties highly efficient and to decrease the amount
of plastic mixed in refuse by collecting it sep-
arately, and so forth.  In this case,"it remains
a question as to how the separately collected
plastic should be disposed of.  But, through the
efforts of the present government and private
industry, the development of technology for in-
cineration of plastic and plastic reclamation
(plastic—} plastic, heat, oil, etc.) is pro-
gressing.  Moreover, the developaent of techno-
logy for apparatus for the automatic separation
of paper, plastic, and metal wastes, technology
for the installation of such apparatus, and for
systems for the dry distillation, pyroxis, and
reuse as gas or oil for refuse is progressing
within a* national project, and a pilot plant is
being built.
   A matter v.-hiclvhas become a problem associated
v/ith the diversif icc.tioii of refuse materials io
that o; Irr^o ro:c
-------
                        •5-
     of household electrical a'aplicncea.  Since -these


     &re large end moreovor irLco.iouutible, they have


     come to "be dealt with "by the completion of facili-


     "ties for pulverisation and compression; "but the


      necessity of more landfill due to the pressure


     of increased volume, and the necessity of pre-


     disposal of v/astes containing materials which


     could contaminate the environment, such as PGBs,


     have "become a "burden to disposal systems in


     municipalities.


(3). Collection and Transportation of Refuse


        In Japanjyi collection and transportation take


     place simultaneously; since transportation takes


     place without processing, and in small vehicles


     suited to collection operations, the efficiency


     of transport lowers along with the worsening of


     the traffic situation.  IJoreoTer, o-ue to the in-
            ^
     crease in number of vehicles v;hich accompanies


     increasing refuse volume, the convergence of


     large  urc.f:."ic volumec of i-of-a;;.^ collection vc-

-------
                       -6-
     the source of the Tokyo refuse  v/ar.
       In order to solve  these problems, resliipping
     and conversion to large-volume transport  by
     means of the establishment of relay bases is
     beginning, and the possibility of the adoption
     of refuse transport pipes is also being studied.
(4). Facilities in the Environs of Refuse  Incinera-
     tion Plants
       '•Vhen refuse incineration facilities are "built,
     opposition from prior residents of the area is
     strong, and there is trouble in maintaining
     sites.  Therefore, along v/ith the improvement
     of refuse incineration facilities, steps  towards
     restoration vis a vis -area residents,  such as
     forestation in the environs of the facilities,
     the creation of parks,  the establishment  of
     v/arm v/ater pools through use of v;aste heat, and
     public presentations are generally being taken.

-------
                      XII
Collection and Transport of  Household  Solid Wastes
                      1974.  9,  24
                  •:.:  /• j  zrvzsicr.-:,  '.:JTY \rAEAJ



                  "L ',-'•',L •J't  ;_J-^jI-'V-"'.lT:0.-i- JAi'A.l

-------
            Collection .a^J Transport of Household Solid Wastes









1.  The Present State of Collection and Transport






     In 1971, Governor of Tokyo Metropolis declared his attitude to be




tackled with the difficult problem of waste management by using  the term




"war against wastes".  In the past three years since,  then various improve-




ments were made in various fields of waste management, but no basic solution




has yet been made of this problem.  The greatest reason for  this may be that




the change in our country's circumstances of waste  (household solid wastes)




were so rapid in the past twenty some years that the  administrative measures




for waste management have been unable to catch up with the changes.




     The economy of our country continued to grow at  a high  rate from the




first half of the 1950's.  During this period the population canie to be




concentrated in cities, the society was converted to  that of mass consump-




tion and the undertakings dealing with used articles, repair works and




collection of waste articles have declined.  All this has caused the




generation of solid wastes to increase quite drastically in  quantity.  And




together with the rapid increase of waste, there has  been a  change in the




quality of waste due to tha rise of people's living standard and the spread




of the use of synthetic chenical products.  As a result; the management of




solid waster, has become ver7/ difficult to be handled  by the  existing systems.
^ .u-pOoi.L jJciCj at a ;'.r-^<~t ui^tar.:. _  irou  ttiz  M.uit-uy









.-is in th;it oฃ the people * s attit-u.:.1.  to;7-rd  their  environment,  which coa-




urjiit i..:o  >.',..:- j.iiiotivitlv'e  .'cf.cr.o  :.'•' .-isLa  ina't.. jc.naat  vitb d\f licultics.

-------
     Y'rte administration  of  r;-iste  nanageraent in Japan, is based on "Wastes


Dlsp''>';al. and Pub Lie C. Leans Lny  Lav/'1  ar.J  is nalnly taken charge of by the


Ministry of Health and Welfare.


     As for the  present  way of waste collection and transport in our


country, at a fixed tine of a  fixed day (once every other day to every


four days) each  individual  household brings polyethylene containers.,


vinyl bags or paper bags containing refuse onto a certain place on a. road


or a refuse dumping ground  adjacent to  a road, and these bags are collected


by a snail-size  waste collection  vehicle (dump truck or packer car) „


     As to the present state of waste management, a survey conducted in


1972 shoved that about 87.8% oฃ the country's total population, that is


87.8% of 106.2 million persons, availed themselves of the household solid


waste collection service delivered  by each municipality.  The total of the


solid x^aste collected throughout  the country amounts to 92,000 metric tons


per day. which is to  be  collected and transported by about 22^900 vehicles.


Sinca tha roads  in Japanese urban areas are usually rather narrow, smaller


cars are adopted as waste collection and transport vehicle > and their


average loading  capacity is 2.0 metric  tons (see Table-1) .


     As is shown in Tabla-l both tb.2 number and the loading capacity of
                          J

collection and transport vehicles are rapidly increasing, and especially


noted is their increase  after  IS 71,  As for the types of vehicles, there


has bfeen a remarkable inc::. t:ie. c.'._-^'..".st:!.n-a~ of eoll<>ctior>. such as

-------
Cfifric concli.ti.ons.  As  to  the  expenditure  of  solid  waste management., en.



the othar hand., it hsf. fcaen rapidly  uprising throughout  the country as



is illustrated in Table-3.   The average  increase  rate of the expenditure



has been 125%/year in the past  eight years, but it has been remarkably



drastic after 1971.  It  is  considered that  most of this  increase in



expenditure is due to the hike  of  cost of collection and transport.






2.  Problems of Waste Collection and Transport




     There are various problems to be listed concerning  solid waste manage-



ment, which have all come to the fore in our country. But in relation to



the waste collection and transport,  they can be grasped  from the four



aspects, public cleansing administration, daily life of  the people, urban



environment and development of  new towns, .  For the administration of public



cleansing, the problems  to  be coped  with are the  increased probability of



the danger to be caused  to  the  waste collection workers  the difficulties



of site selection of waste  disposal  center  (incinerating factory, plant



for reprocessing wasta into fertilizer,  etc.)  and waste  dumping ground



(reclamation ground., etc,)  due  to  the oppositions and resistance raised



by residents in the area against the concentration of waste truck traffic,
                      f


the drastic uprise of the waste collection  and transport cost (from collec-



tion to disposal).



     T-'.ile on che pare cr t".:o psopio's daily 3ifo;  die naj'r nroblsras



?.r2 th'i '"_"u;-iL-lativ-.i .1 "•  *'. -_i3:\  rafu-e Lift  out for -\ Ion:; tini'd because of



.', •- deer = "1.-?a 01 roT^e co^l=ctior.  Jre::ca:.cy,  -'.-.-  -./.aste bec'rii?1.,:; norc nassive



,-..J bulky  c':i2 D^jr.l-r.'' _,  havi:,,^;  to  'jc tine-bound  co put out tha vn.sre at



a fixed tine, etc,



     lu tha vistj^oint of th; urb.ir. environraan.ty  ta2  sida;falks o^ roads or

-------
s 'm; tines even the road sid-js  in urban.  aread  have  ths household solid


;,<..;: a: 3 ac;uj.ulu.teu oa thar., which  can b-a  an inpadiment to the traFtic


of pedestrians or bicycles.  Ths waste  collection  cars have to go slow


alon^ the roads and have  to stop a while  frequently in ord^r to collect


th-e accumulated wastes, vhich  is one ot' tha factors deteriorating the


road traffic efficiency.


     Moreover 3 in the vicinity of  waste incineration plants or waste


dumping ground, there is  the traffic of waste transport vehicles in


concentration occupying a major portion of  the traffic volume.  This


gives rise to traffic accidents, noise, vibration, exhaust gas and other


unsanitary conditions- which all cause  much nuisance to the nearby


residents.  These are the major problems  to be dealt with from the stand-


point of road administration or protection of urban environment., and they


seak immediate solutions.


     One of the characteristic features of our country is found in the


construction of large-scale naw towns in  the  outskirts of big cities.


Tha municipality with big vacant land in  which such new towns are to be


developed usually has a small  population  and  limited industries and as


a natter of coarse it cannot at once be adapted to the scale of the new

                          •
town in  terms of financial scale as well  as administrative competence.


     Accordingly, v'^er. ch'i uanicipality has all of a sudden accommodated


 ;!"i •-O'julatio'": .15 iva.v.' as-, i^varal  timon of  Its original within the same


    •'.cipal boundary. t'.'iLr.  ^ •:.-: ~3>. va  ;;Lll  bs i:\->o;-;a<-l  oa e/ary asyact of the


                                                \ t.y,  '^th res^-'ict to tha
• i-..;c icc;-a:ujvi  Lho  r._nb^r  o:  .'ot^^i1.-: c •  a .-'iL'f icicat extent witliin a vary


.,',-irt timo,  Such  aa  increaie  oC tlis Muivicipality : 3 burden both adtnini-

-------
claansinj, but  Lt ha;: emerged in the administration of education, and  many




or.hir f: Lei-Is.  This Is often the reason why the de-'-ilopir^nt of  a large




scali new town t-nds to ba rejected by municipalities,  This  is one of




the most difficult problems for our country.









3.  Measures for Collection and Transport






     A number of measures have already been executed for  the  solution of




above-mentioned problems.




     As to the containers of wastes for collection, they  used to be waste




boxes made of wood.  But nowadays polyethylene garbage containers are




being adopted, which have unified sizes and forms  easy to be  collected




and much, more sanitary as well as good in appearance,  More spreading in




use than polyethylene containers now are vinyl bags and paper bags with




improved conveniency in collection and sanitation.  Storage containers




(public containers specially designed for mechanical collection and/or




transport) are also partially used.




     As for the waste collection places, collection at waste  dumping




ground is now adopted instead of the former collection at each household




in order to improve the efficiency of collection.  In some regions it is




obligatory for large buildings to provide an access for waste collection




vehicles.




     Regarding the collection time, ic is now  cixed hour  fixed day




collection ir-jcead of collection at irregular  frcciuency*




     Tht: :;.i.;.ca collection vc-iiclo-j used t.j  j~~  dunp urucks-, but ..to*.-; Lhey




.ire chanjeci co s"-?.ciai vehicles juch aj p-ic/.er cars ^ith  r-'proved sanita-




tion .irid et'f ic.ten.cy,  The use of cant dinar cr.rt; is also bains anhjmcea




in some regions.

-------
     Iha transport of collected wastes is closely related to the road traffic




co.v/i.;,tic/a in our country.  Cor-version is now being promoted from the direct




deliv-ixy by small collection vehicles to the transport by large transport




vshicle5> large container cars and transport vessels.  However since the




land acquisition of transit base for transshipment from collection




vehicles to transport vehicles is very difficult, the rationalization




of transport system is making a very slow progress at present.




     Apart from the above measures which have so far been taken for the




rationalization of refuse collection and transport system, new measures




are about to be established mainly from the standpoints of city planning




and road administration.




     The cities have to meet various requirements such as that they have




to be preserve sanitation and beauty, that the impediments caused to




traffic by refuse collection have to be eliminated, that the refuse




collection system has to be convenient for the residents, that the labor




of refuse collection and transport must be saved, etc.  In order to




satisfy these requirements, special facilities such as pipes for the




exclusive use of household solid waste management have to be provided  to




cities just as sewage systems as their own facilities for the management




of liquid wastes.  In this context, it is proposed that such facilities




fcr the management ot household solid wastes should be constructed within




t'.-..; total framework of urban facility construction.








-'   .-.-j^or.aci.^ Cev.lsctieri .-qr-.d Tr^nspc-rt Systan






.' v~c,;un. tr-in™>~ort ovi'ton IMซ V-en devv.o-jed reccntlv as one of.  the  new




ii--^;-_05 of solid wa&te coliecciou, a:;,.1.  > ".  i.r> ;^te. of tan applied  than




ev^r in various new towns of European countries.  Also development is now

-------
 un^r  way  for  a  system to transport  all the  collected solid wastes by pipes



 ov-::ic a long  distance or for a driverlcss guide way system.   And, a study


 is  being made  as to  a concept of  formulating a future automatic collec-



 tion and transport system by combining thase new types of hardware,



'This concept of  refuse collection and transport system is as follows:



     A refuse  throw-in box (refuse post) is  set up at every household or


 at  one place for every 20 - 30 households in which they can throw solid.



 wastes other than big refuse.  And through the vacuum collection pipes



 which  are  distributed throughout  a city, the wastes are sucked in and


 carried to a waste collection center by valve operation controlled by a



 central control  system.  As the economical waste suction distance of this



 system is  estimated  at 1.5 - 2.0  Kins, a small-scale new town, will be



 able to adopt  a  complete household solid wastes management system by



 connecting this  system directly with an incineration plant.  However, in



 the case of  an area  where the incineration plant is located far from the



 collection center or a large-scale new town  and a built-up area covering



 a wide area, wastes  have to be re-collected  and transported over a long



 or  a medium  distance, which will  require a further improved system.  As



 the system of  long or medium distance transport of this kind, capsule



 transport5 pressure  pipe transport and vacuum transport are being developed.
                       *?

 Moreover5  in casa of big citiess  where a long distance and mass transport



 is  required, container transport  of  solid wastes by a new traffic system


 (such  ,?.3 nediun-volune gui.ia way  system) will bs ciora advantageous in



 "?sr cas^.s ~!v"i-.  u%.2  ?.j.;iv.-i-"\?.."A:"..5,*,  capsule  tramvTorc and others.



     In chis •'.-.}•, iiGur.V::old joii-l -'..sees can !v? automatically collected



 and transposed  in o.r^a.-> irorn .1 j-.uili-scalj  new town to big cities by



 c!:a combination  of vacuum collection, capsule transport and medium-volume

-------
     •It is considered that the pipes for the automatic collection and




 transport of household solid wastes are to be placed mainly under roads,




 Especially} 'Vith respect  to refuse posts which ara to be provided to




 residential areas with lower buildings5 they cannot function to serve the




'•residents unless th-ay are placed on sidewalks or on. the land abutting




 an roads.




     On the other hand, howevers the road area has already bean applied to




 complicated uses with various attachments and properties built on or below




 them.  The result is that the excavation for the maintenance and repair of,




 roads  causes much hindrance to road traffic at present.




     In order to prevent  that hindrance, the Road Law (Law No.180, 1952)




 provides that any exclusive use of road shall be determined by the judge-




 ments  of the road authority except when there are particular provisions of




 the  law.  Pipes and cables under roads must be well adjusted and coordinated




 and  located according to  a definite plan.  For this purpose, the construc-




 tion of cotamon ducts for  utility pipes and cables is being promoted  in




 order  to accommodate these in a highly intensive and efficient way.




 Simultaneously, a policy  is being adopted in road administration to




 approve the placement of  only those as ara designated by city planning




 as supply and disposal facilities,




     Therefore, it  is very important  to include refuse  incineration plants




 as well as  the pipes for  refuse collection and transport as  an  indispensible




 part of city planning,, not only because they can be  planned  and constructed




 in h-ir.aony  witn the land  use plan of  the  neighboring area and oฃfter city




 ir.ciiitics  jut also because  it enables a  batter ivad adninistratioi?-*

-------
5.,  The Present State of Au tons tic Collection and Transport System in Japan






     At the time when th-i national budget of fiscal 1974 was under delibera-




tion, a proposition was raised that the national government should subsidize




the construction cost of the automatic collection and transport system  to




be undertaken by local governments.  This proposition was rejected as




being premature.  However, there is an increasing demand for the establish-




ment of the automatic collection and transport system in new towns, and




this subsidy system is strongly demanded again at present in the compilation




of 1975 national budget.




     Table-4 shows the areas for which the construction of the automatic




collection and transport system is already decided.  In other various




large-scale new towns and redeveloped areas studies are now going on as




to whether the same system should be established.




     As for the development of hardware for the system in our country,




there are at present 7 industrial groups for vacuum collection, system,




3 industrial groups for capsule transport system (a system to transport




capsules by the movement of liquid in pipes), 1 group for pressure trans-




port and 9 industrial groups for P^T-type system,, which are engaged in




research and development.




     Five of the seven industrial groups working on vacuum collection




system have technical tie-up with foreign companies-, and the other two




are domestic companies with no tie-up r-ith foreign countries,  Three of




:'.;?.e savan ccnpar.ie;? installed Cull-sized test plants in 1972 and after-




--i~:.c. ir.-l th^y are con.lMCtir'/j various exp^ri-n^a1::. for the understanding




7ir;d t'-ie ?v~u:tion r-v r;i2 pr-^l-r."? '<ฃ r.v""3e ~oV 2c". Ion in cur country *




     Conc^r-.iir.^ t\a capsule transport, one cf the three industrial groups




installed a full-sized nsst plant in-1972 and has executed various experiments,

-------
     As to P -assure transport systen, chough only oae sroup  is  engaged in




C"L= i.y5t:ฃn; tha ?,roun has installed a  test plant of full  siza  and




lias succeeded in. transport: experiments  with its own domestic technology.




     With respact to PRT system,  the construction plan  is  being promoted




mainly for passengers.  There are sonie  groups which are proceeding with




the development of hardware of  this system for refuse transport, though




there is yet no specific plan to  construct the facilities  exclusively for




refuse transport immediately right now.  The development of  PRT system




in our country is now undertaken  by five industrial groups of domestic




technology and other four industrial groups which are under  technical




tie-up with foreign countries.  Test lines have been provided at seven




places where various experiments  are being conducted.   For the  construction




of PRT system, demands have been  raised from three new  towns in the




compilation of 1975 national budget for a government subsidy to be




extended as a. part of road construction expenditure.









6=  Conclusion






     As mentioned above, so far as the  hardware of the  automatic waste




collection and transport system is concerned,  it is the manufacturing




groups that have been engaged in  research and  development  in our country.




In order to establish this system as one of the urban public facilities,




several problems have to be solved,  In the first place;  the standards




:";:• •;'..ฃ sy^iar.. r.aot "je sst up s.:ch as  the standard oC planning, t'n.3 jjtaridar




?•" ^truituro. th.t; ccar.dard of ;,cf2;-- :;?'vi pacurit.'/   the  st^'.ruIarJ ci envirun-




.-•-.ir.,  etc., '•'hic':i are under study at rrosaat.




     I'.ie secor.-J problem arii^^  fro-  th^ faar  th.it:  u'.\2  ur>?rs  of  th~; 3 system




:nij:'.u discharge whatever they consider  are wastes, because it is  too

-------
convenieac> and as a result thi amount of wastes might be the more




expanded,.  This problem will be solved by strengthening the collection




of wastes by sorting thara by kind that has recently been put into practice




let most cities of Japan as well as by further promoting the development of




waste sorting techniques which are now under developnant along with the




propagation of this system.




     The third problem is that measures have to be taken in. order to




prevent this system1s being used as a place in which to conceal the




evidences of crimes.  Various studies are being made for this problem,




but so far no conclusive solution has been worked out.




     The fourth problem is about the establishment of the principle for




the allocation of construction expenses and maintenance or management




expenses of the system.  As for the construction expenses, a direction has




been fixed to subsidize local governments.  However, regarding the




maintenance and management expenses, there is an urgent necessity to




establish a principle for a fair allocation of the expenses since the




ordinary waste collection of household solid wastes is providing free




service for residents.




     The development of science and technology is amazing indeed in recent




years.  However, since the development of science and technology is too




rapid and the society has not been sufficiently prepared to accept the




developments there are many cases that thay cannot be presented to the




use of the people.  Tlio utilization of the latest technology should be




-o^sacs^: only alter a ^-^Jiic i_:ic .i^sessment is n?de or the merits as x?ell




ซ3 tha cer.er'. ;s as ill effects of the cschnoio^ >  It is required L'nat




offorts should lv> nacia in ordar to conL.ir.iiaily r'Ca^p the up-to-date




information of the development oฃ technology which will lead to the welfare




01 the paopla as well as to nurture tb.2 ra?.dir.ess of the society to accept
                                    11 -

-------
_/.-: cecbnolo^icai. d'cveloo.;.^.:.-,  This  should bi done not only  In. the field




cr, Ji^zor.atic  waste collactzo-; and  transport system of our  concern but also




i:i Dthar various  fields,

-------
  w
  o
 o
 p.
 CO
 J-)

 CL)
 cn
 rt
 O


 >,
 U
 rj
 d
 o
•H
-d
 O
r-l
 a
r-i
t

i ! C
, >> 0
' on u u
C -H
! , -4 0 0
i *^3 ซ^3 *r^
01 C. ^
i O C w
' ปJ O 0)
.5
• ^"J i
o
H M
cu

ง'

2
x-s
>> 0
t>0 4J 4J
|T-4 ^J
v-t *n
•H O O
-O stf -H
nl O. J-4
1 O Cd 4J
i-3 U OJ
co e
%4 ^^X
0)
"
CJ

• &
3
\ ^
ป-*s O
60 -U 4J
C -H
•H O O
4ri T3 CO -H
O C3 CU M
3 O tfl <->
ilM K-3 O GJ
• -u e
x_>
^
ct5
C ^4
'H QJ
*^3 i ^-O
'^ 3
0 3

^
K^ O
fc3 -U W
iJ G -H
W -rH O CJ
O TJ rt -H
0. I ^J Q, V4
; O cl -U
•z i _i a ซJ
;- -' E
^ O |
-~ ~
— 'J
V i -^
r. 'li
• -^








O
o
rxป
at
r-l
CM


O
O
CM

O
*•*



O
0
cn
A
rH



O
o
C*^
*


0
o
CO
rH
iH



O
O

^
tn
y



0
o
•O
9.
CO



-.,
0
^-.-
^-J."

m
vi}
O^





O
0
in
3ซ
CM
CM


O
O
rH

CM
iH



0
O
<^





O
O
o%



o
0
cn
CM
r-l



0
o
cn
A
o




o
o
0*^
.*ป
3"\



._,
^j
•v>
^J.

o
•o
cr>





O
C
1J^\
A
to
0*4


O
O
CM
A
cn
•H



0
0






0
o
r-



O
o

CM
rH



O
O
f^
OS
o




o
o
rH
PS •
CM
r-l


—,
O

cs
CO


o.
o
in
X
**O
^



0
o
CO





o
o
\0



o
o
C7\
cn
iH



o
o
SO

"sO




o
o
o
OS
CO
fH


~.
o
cn
CA

o

CT\





o
0
r-l
n
CO
CO


o
o
-3-

cy>
r-t



o
o
co





o
o
^o



o
o
VO
00
rH



0
o
^Q
ot
CO




o
0
r—
n
CO
rH


o
— 4
01
o
"""
r-i
r-
CTv





o
o
r-ป.
(V
vO
^3*


O
0

9*
CM
CM



O
o
cn
ซ>
iH



O
O
er\



o
o
o
CM
CM



O
O
O
ff*
o
rH



o
O
cn
0s
cn



o
1 o
c>
— i
r-i
CM
rซป.
G~*
                                             r-l
                                                                -   13  -

-------




























4J
C
01
to
nj
d
s

.u
u
Cl
'f>
•H

>•>
4J
•H
rH
cO

•H
O
iH
rj
2
e
,0
^j
j^
o
0.
en
pj
ซs
^
4J

r;

O
U
;)
r - ^
!•*-!
O
^ j

,
_ -M O CU 6
^
4)
ซ -I) Q) O
01 O-rH O
•U U O
fj 4-> -H ป
i-t TO ^a >-H
ซg o y SH
S CJ > *~s
<&
01 .--ป
cJ ฃ
a o
S-H
IW 0> rH
(U O rH rH
4J O -rl
C w -H B
•r-l CO 42 rH
a 8 > 2!.
in

^.^
cfl
(U
r>>
01 0
00 O
en m o
V-J 01 *
<11 OOrH
^ ^ _*H

sj-


4^
M-l CD G
O 4-1 (U x-\
01 CO B d
)-j p rj 1) o
0) 01 & bO W
,0 _Ji5 rt r-i
6 (-I r-l C 01
3 O O 
CM
, >+-(
o a
•VJ AJ rj
| -H CJ -D
1 -' V 
cy & o ^
rH

1
I

i




rH rH CO fO
O • • *
rH rH rH rH






O O O O
r~ O rH co
CM CO CO CO









o o o >n
O O O rH
CO 00 O CO
CM CM CO CO








r>. rH m in
O CO l>> rH










o o o o
o o o o
vO Cvi f.-4 (x^
M o-k e* c*
^- co r- cvj
CO CO CO -
CO CTi CTv O
rH




O O '": O
^~ '_• O O
vO u,1 -.T -3-
1
r-. cvj rป ro
co  C^>
— i --i — ;



F-t
0
rH






O

CO









O

ซ*
\0








04
I/^
*-^
cs
rH







O
O
VJD

rH
VO





CM
rH
in
*
v,O
rH




VJ>
' ''
r\
,\
-.O
O



CN
r-^.
r,~N
•"•

-------






















4J
C
01
to
C!
•3

0)
4-J
tft
rt
5

t3
-H
t— <
O
t/)

W
O
ft)
u
ซ
$
3
ปw
O
j 1
01
c
y
4J
T*
a
•
ซ*
0)
i t
•W
cn
nJ

t)
•H
t-l
O
cn

u-.
o

j_ป
C
3
O
ซ
n


X
a>
TJ
M

CM

CO
OJ
M
r
CJ
1

y— s
d
4J 0
r-1 i_i
C3 4J
CD ^
งo
o
MO
ra ซ
C -H
a) a*
S *-'

M
cd
CJ
?*ป
n
0)
p.
x*-\
4J 01
c c
a; o
B *J


                                                                  O
               O

               LO
               m
                            m     >.o      r>-     co     CN-
                            O     VC      O     VTl     \O"
                            rr\     CA      c~i     cy>     o
                            r-i     fH      rH     t-t     ,H
c^
.H

-------











1
1

L
[



I

j
I
J

\


_
i
i
i
i
i
6 :
0) i
4_j [
co \
^t '
OT ;
;
1 * i
Jj
0 '
c.
w
C !
C3 '
)-> '
4-1 ,

*"3 i
e !
ซ
c .
o ,
•H
4_)
U
a
•-* !
i— i •
o
a
i
OJ
4J- '
CT
C3 -
^s

O
_i
•M
5
c
•U
Z3


V.



O
— ^
,_
fj
ฃi
^,
™


1


i

J>s
I *^3
! a
.a
!
; c
! "H"

i s
1 ฐ
0
;ฃ
i
t
1 Jj
ts : rt
o • a)
^ . >,
^ 1
1 4-1
a • a)
— to
4-* ' ^4
a
u-i ! E-i
0 ,

Q)
S ' 4J
•H O
r-t CO
— 1 I-l
3 C5
0 . H

•S
1 O
• c
• c
a
1 i~n
P-t



j

U-4
o

ป
^
ฃ?4



~;
O
^
ป-ซ
c^
— !































a
u
c
0)
S
g
o
u

o



o
JJ

^4
?c
Ci
^>




a
G)
J-l
aj




13

C
S

1— t
^,

c
o
- J
4-1
c^3
t-i
2
p,
O





























S

4J
m

m

U Q)
•H A

^4
O U-i
a) o

0> 00
o d
C iH
0> rH

i *ซป
o S
o -5




^^
(Q
f^
ป— '


T3

O

0)
CO
3
o




<-•
0
05
Jj
CJ
c-


c
o
—I
jj
a
o
t—4
t~^
O




4)

3
4J
U
0)
U-*
Vi


QJ
^Q
•rl
J2




fs^
p>n
o^
I-l

*
^J
Ou
^j


co
r~s
1

p^
av
H



•^T
ป
*ซcf
c\j
















CO

' CO
9*
O
O
o
"* c
JJ O
Jj ^ -*-J
O ci 4->
cx -b c
w --, o
C eft r-i
rt C i-1
}-l O O
V 4-> 0



' o

3*
&*> •ป-*
4J (J
•H O
u ^
rt M
6 p^
a)
x o
o to
^ o
0 >>




r~. co

CT^ ON
f-l •-ป

• •
)J M
C, Cu
*J< ^^


O
co
1 !

^^
^^
i-l



lO
•
U"l
! CM
i-H






O
O
O
1 -

^



O
o
o
1
0












c
0
•H
4J
d
*-4
O
a.

o
u
CO
c

90
3





















































c
o
•H
ij
O
a
r— !
rH
o
u


f*1
e
•H
W
3 M
0 C
K C -H C
O ซ O
XJ 4-> O 4J
•^ aj 33 cj

O C O
a) a. co D.
ja ปj a. M
O O CO O
US U '-5 0




CO

Q^
V^

•
%4
Cu



O
CO
1

fv*.
^^
I-l





fo
o







o
o
0
(t.

o


c
o
•I-l
4-1
a
o
t-H
t-t
o
o

ฃ3
C
•H
01
3
ฃ

K c
>% O
•!-l 4J
O Oj
W
A O
^ o-

03 O
0 O




m

CTป
•-I

•
4-1
o
o


co
rsป
1
in
p^.
o\
rH





O
j— |







co
ON
C*"V
.\
CO




o
O
CO
*
n


















to
Ci
•H C
W O
5 W

""* M
C 0
ซtf Cu
CU M
n) o
"-> O




















































c
o
•H
4.1
O
CD
r-l
^~4
0
0

CO
e
•rl
W
3
0
ffi

>>
•H
O

oj
Jy?
ซ
to
O




f-^
fv,.
CT*
i-t

•
V*
frt
•3


CO
r**ป
i
vO
r-
CTv
r-l





O
!-ป
r-l






O
r-t
G\
Ok
CTl




O
o
o
c\
o




















c
o
4J
m
u

O*
u
o
0


















































!t




O
•M  O
            o
            4J
           •H
            s
                                                                     O

                                                                    -H


                                                                     O
                                                                           3  O
           •H

            CC
            i
            f:
            u


           "o
           ^
            o
                                                                                        •t-i


                                                                                         (
                                                                                         r*

                                                                                        "a

                                                                                        o

-------
                           XIII

          ACTUAL CO;il;ITIOi;3 III REFUSE j[.iAWAGE:.:EitT
                     IN JAPANESE CITIES
                     TAKASHI MIYAHOHARA
                        AUGUST,  1974
              ENVIROI-n.ZCNTAL  CLEANING BUREAU,
                          YOKOHAMA
Tiie paper to "be  presenter, to:
      "The Sucoiicl Jc'p-:.n-U.3.  Conference  on Solic. \Vaste
r.^r-'-.:jG]::'jnt," Scpter/oer, 1974,  ".."C'.ฃh:rp-^l;on, D.C., U.S.A,

-------
ACTUAL COHDITIONS 117 REFUSE IIANAGELENT IN JAPANESE CITIES

  1.  Content of City Refuse
          City refuse is solid waste materials discharged
  from city residents' daily life.  It is classified as
  garbage, rubbish, or large refuse.  In particular, a
  mixture of garbage and rubbish is called household re-
  fuse.
          It is the responsibility of the local govern-
  ments to manage this city refuse, and it is a fundamen-
  tal principle that local governments v/ill do all of the
  collection, transport, intermediate treatment, and .final
  disposal.  The methods of their treatment processes
  differ according to such factors as city location, shape,
  and financial situation.
  2.  The Nature and Volume of Household Refuse
          The volume of household refuse discharged dif-
  fers by city, season, standard of living, lifestyle, and
  so forth, and i:i J^p^n it averages about 1 kg. per day

-------
                          —2"
per pecuon.  TMa unit cli3clu.1.:',;;•:; volumn Jncrcacor, in
proportion to city sise and in proportion to a resi-
dent's income level.  3y 1985 it is estimated it v/ill
increase to about 1.5 kฃ. Per day Per person.
        The nature of household refuse also differs
seasonally, annually, and regionally.  As shown in
Figure 1, which indicates the nature of household re-
fuse in Yokohama in 1973, Japanese household refuse
is distinctively high in water content and low in
heating value.
3.  Concerning Large Refuse
        As housing conditions "become more crowded and
standard of living rises, v:hen televisions, washing
machines, and furniture, which were used as permanent-
ly durable goods, breax down or go out of style, they
begin to be used as non-durable consumer goods, new
ones are bought in their place, and, if useless, they
are discharged as refuse.  These are called large re-
fuse, and, since compared to household refuse, they
are larger and more often include incombustible mater-
iolc, there h?,vo been oroblemc ir. the pr:st as to smooth
               \.o~v r •. o ~:' ' ecv, > on  oi^..o•.-._•; p.nci

-------
merit technology.  It became necessary "to collect them



separately from household refuse end. to insert pulveri-



zing and compressing processes into the management pro-



cess.



4.  Collection of City Refuse



        General methods include mixing garbage and



rubbish and storing them in receptacles which are per-



iodically collected by collection vehicles and trans-



ported to treatment plants and landfill disposal sites.



The method was selected "by which it  is collected from



a prescribed place at a fixed time on a fixed day.  In



general it is collected with a frequency of "two or



three times a week.



        large refuse is collected either once a month



or once every three months oh a fixed day.  So that



large refuse may be brought to the prescribed freight



collection spots in the road on the appointed day and



time, it is necessary to have sanitary storage places



within the house, while a receptacle of capacity to



match the frequency level and volume of discharge, and



a pl:':cc to lira::? this receptacle must be suitably main-



tained.

-------
        In this kind of collection and transportation
                                                    ป
system, on the average in Japan, the standard worker
handler a volume of a"bout 1,5 tons daily, not an un-
healthily high work load.
        The cost of city refuse management is handled
by a tax paid by city residents, yet in the cost of re-
fuse management, the majority (about 70^) is taken up
by collection and transport.
        Hereafter, it is necessary to have optimum dis-
tribution of personnel and collection vehicles, and a
uniform standard size a.nd shape for receptacles; also,
it is necessary to optimize the number and location of
collection points and the scale and distribution of dis-
posal sites, and, along v-ith a plan to make standard
transportation more efficient, it is necessary to develop
and adapt technology for such things as the improvement
of heavy vehicles, train transportation, adaptation of
transportation in containers, and compressed air trans-
portation,
5.  2rog-.t:r.ent of City Refuse
        Such methods ac iv:.c in ^ration, coerceting, end

-------
                           -5-
tho vicinity of cities, where population density is high



arid the flow of materials is taxing, incineration is em-



phasized in order to deal with it sanitarily and in a



short tine.



        However, there is a certainty of opposition from



residents to the building of incineration facilities, and



they have become representative of disliked nunicipal



facilities.



        Hereafter, environmental pollution controls for



incineration facilities will have to toe completed.  For



example, a standard for soot discharge of "below 0.03 g/



STPm", and a ground level concentration of toxic gases



such as SO . HO,., and HG1, of "belov; 0.005 ppm. are
          JL    .A.


planned for large cities; these standards are stricter



than national standards and are independentely formulated.



        Buildings constructed should be of a design which



matches municipal environment.



        "Waste h3:it shoulC be used reasonably* ?or example,



warm water pools, facilities for the benefit of the el-



derly, and the improvement of benefits for residents of



the areas near rcfuco treatment plants should, be plc-mi? d.



                    rirj.cc th'j Meeting v.jjjic of house—

-------
                          -6-
hold refuse is 1200-1500 kcal./kg., it has a heating
capacity about one quarter that of coal or city gas,
and can IDC used for the generation of electrical pov/er,
for community hot water supplies, community central
heating systems, and so forth.
        Large refuse is crushed, the combustible mater-
ials incinerated, recyclable materials reclaimed as
resources, and other materials used for landfill.
Since the technology of crushing and separation is nevr,
future technological developments are anticipated.
       Systems for the reclaiming and use of paper,
glass, metal, etc., which are contained in household
refuse, are "being researched, and there are methods
"both for separation at the time of discharge and for
mechanical separation of collected garbage, and the
former is working v/ell through residents' organization;
but there are problems in that the cost of reclaimed
:^rterials is unstable cjid cooperation by residents is
necessary.
        Research and development are being carried on
           nethodi' for compressing r^rb",r;e and using
                                             ~nc re-

-------
                         —7-
maining ashes after incinoration and effectively using
them for building or engineering materials.
       Compos tin,:; is one influential disposal method,
since it is in effective use, "but the demand for cos-
post has declined.  Since the era of demand for compost
does not conform v/ith manufacturing, it is necessary to
have a large volume of stock, and so it does not often
occur in Japanese cities.
        Outside of incineration, most disposal is  done
"by landfill.  landfill of both  incombustible refuse and
of  ashes left after incineration occur together.   Land-
fill sites have been established in both  suburban  hills
and v/aterfronts, but since there is the problem, of water
contamination v/ith waterfront landfill, most cities use
mountainside landfill.
        Landfill occurs by piling up alternate layers  of
refuse less than 3 meters thick and of soil cover  more
than 0.5 netere thick.  In order to prevent environ-
mental pollution, and as a countermeasure against  foul
odors, plenty of covering materials are used,  and  in-
sec tide 2 ic c.ii;.:er3ed to prevent ;;^olif cr'_tion of
harriiful  insec-;;::.  Hov/ov01", ii tiiero is no crot,t:aent of

-------
v/ater contaminated "by leachate,  or if equipment for



the ventilation or conoustion of gas produced iron the



refuse layers (50-60^ nethane) is not built, then com-



plete environmental pollution controls have not "been



planned.

-------
        OF LBACIIATE A1TD GASES DISCHARGED PROM LANDFILL SIT2S
          —Using Yokohama  as art Actual Ezampla
                               •by

                      TAKASHI  LHYMOHARA
               EFVIROi::naiTx\L CT/flAIIIrlG BUIliAU,
                           YOKOHAZ-IA
Tlic  priv;or  to  "bo pre;>3n~tod toi
      :!Tli?  .^j- cor''"  -."'•/?;• .n-7'.3. Oonl'orrp.co  cri Solid V/acte
~..:^::. ;••:•:,:': nt,"  Sc"o^T.;.:00r,  I9ri-l,  ..o-clii.i^':o:>, D . C ., U.S.A.

-------
TREATLIEilT 0? LEAC1J.T3 AIH) OASiCS DISCHARGED PRO:.I LAITDPILL  SIDES
            —Using Yokohama as an Actual Example

  1.  Volume of Landfill Refuse
         In Yokohama, of the approximately 3000 tons  of re-
  fuse collected by the city daily, about 1500 tons are dis-
  posed of by incineration, while the remaining 1500  tons
  and about 300 tons of incineration ash are disposed of
  through landfill.
  2.  General Aspects of Landfill Sites
         Landfill sites have been established in the  city's
  suburban mountain valleys, and currently are four in num-
  ber, covering areas of between 80,000 and 550,000 square
  meters.  Since the landfill sites are small in scale, the
  period of landfill for one site is about tv/o years.
         Landfill sites are land borrowed from private land-
  owners in order to landfill refuse, create land, and re-
  turn it, but there are tv/o landfill sites vrhich have not
  yet been returned because the production of leachate and
  ฃ-;?,s h'-n nov. --ot ccc/ro:;.
                                       refuse cv

-------
level land, with two to four layers of refuse and cover-
ing material piled on the slopes.  One layer of refuse is
about tv;o to three rasters thick, while one la,yer of cover-
ing material is about half a meter thick.  The final layer
of covering material is approximately one meter thick.
       Since the refuse is decomposed by anaerobic decom-
position, leachate and gas are produced.
4ป  Treatment of Leachate
       (1). Volume of Leachate
               V/ater contained in refuse is exuded, as
            are rairr.vater and water contained in decom-
            posed organic materials, both of which have
            permeated the layers of refuse..
               Consequently, the water volume differs
            according to topography, climatic conditions,
            and the nature of the soil, but it is largely
            deteraided "by the valley's water volume and
            precipitation prior to landfill
       (2)ซ Method of Leachatc Discharge
               Prior to landfill, perforated drainage
            "oir.O"; •:"_•• 2 1 ~"oi  in  Ed'/cmc^..  ?,o indicated  in

-------
(3)ป Quality of Leachate
       'Leschate will exude iron landfill sites
     after about the first six months.  The quali-
     ty oT this water is as follows:

                 pH    5-6
                BOD    1000 - 2000 ppm.
                 S3    500 - 1000 ppm.
           Total Fe    150 - 35C ppn.
            Total N    100 - 300 ppm.

(4). Changes in Leachate Volume and Quality
        leachate starts six months after landfill
     "begins, and six months after landfill is ter-
     minated, the v;ater volume decreases to about
     one-third, while the BOD concentration also
     lowers to one third. (Figure 2).
        During precipitation, the water volume in-
     creases, but since  the concentration of BOD
     does not decrease, the concentration of pol-
     lutc_ntc decreases.
        It "tc.-:?3 about two ;ye?r3 until the secre-
      tioi'i o'? Ir^c/iate cec;1":.

-------
        (5') i Treatment of Leachate
                Since drainage fron landfill  sites flov;s
             into rivers and irrigation canals,  it must
             "be purified.  Many treatment methods were
             tried, "but the method of  combining acti-
             vated sludge processes and the coagulating
             sedimentation process was the most success-
             ful.  A flow chart of this process is shown
             as Figure 3.
                The standard for  the quality  of treated
             water is as follows:
                       BOD    "below 30 ppm.
                        SS    "below 70 ppia.
                  Total Pe    "below 3  ppni.
5.  Exhausted Gas
       Since refuse decomposes anaerobically  in landfill,
combustible gas is produced.  Gas composition is mainly
CH, , CQ2, and Up.  It is necessary to  provide gas vents
as well as burners, and to ventilate and  bum it.
       Gas production is large principally in the en-
viror~3 cT  rlvj 1^ .'•":" ill.  It  is t":ioj.g}i': thcj,t  this is due
 o   .o cr.'i.;.-  -j- c  -L.\:.'.    G-;v:.;c.. ;.'." rou

-------
the "base ground layer.  The conditions for the construc-



tion of gas vents are indicated in Figure 4-.



        Gao ventilation pipes are 15 cm. perforated vinyl



chloride pipes v/iiich are layed about three meters "below



the surface of the final layer.  Gas passes through these



pipes, flowing from low to high locations.



        Ventilation pipes are spaced at approximately



thirty-meter intervals in level land and at fifty-meter



intervals in sloping land; they draw the produced gas up



to the surface of the land to be burned.  Since the gas



has a pressure of 3-5 mm.Aq., and blows out of the pipes



naturally, this natural draft is used in its combustion*



An outline of the combustion facilities is given in Fig-



ure 5 .



        Since gas ventilation pipes and combustion facili-



ties are built on the topmost refuse layer, combustion



starts from the time that landfill is for the most part



over.  Gas combustion continues for three years after



landfill is terminated and the final soil covering occurs,



        Although the volume of gas produced has not been



measured, there :L ~ a tendency for the vclir-e of gas pro-
                     continvi.ir. ••; c'-cn.r vor:."ohor iv.vl higher

-------
                         XIV
                TREATLI21TT  0? TOIIC ViASTES
                     T3UTOLIU FUKUDA
                   TADAYUKI L'lORISHITA
                       AUGUST, 1974
DEPARTMENT OP UATER  SUPPLY AND EHVIRON1-IS1ITAL SANITATION,
              EJTVIROJTT-SITTAL HEALTH BUREAU,
            MINISTRY  OP HEALTH AND \7ELPAHE of
                           JAPAN
     aper to ~oe proGontcd -to:
     "n'hn ooconcl J,v-:.a:i-TJ.3. Confero.aco on Solid  .Vc.rjte
     eaont,ls Scp-'jemoor,  3-071, '..cishiii^ton, D.C.,  U.S.A.

-------
                   Tl-IUTT OF TOZIC Y/AST3S
1.  Introduction
      In January, 1972, a conference was held in Tokyo
concerning the general administration of waste manage-
ment in Japan; a report was given at the First Japan-
U.S. Conference on Solid '.Vaste Management.  In it, an
explanation was given covering all phases of the "Y/aate
Management and Public Cleansing Lav/11 (1970, Law Number
137, afterwards referred to as the "Waste Management
Act")ป which is the focus of the movement to advance
waste management.  .Dhe explanation included the purpose
of the law, its definition of waste materials, and ex-
planations of duties of the enterpriser, general waste
management, industrial waste management, penal regula-
tions, and so forth.  However, standards for waste col-
lection, management, snd disposal are prescribed "by
the Cabinet Orders based on the "V/aste Management Act"
and on the "Llarine Pollution Control Lav;" (1970, Law-
Number 135);  and since the standards for collection,

-------
transportation, and disposal of the toxic waste materials
to "be discussed are included in these Cabinet Orders, v/e
will "begin our explanation with these standards.
        *Hadioactive wastes are not dealt with here
         as if included in "toxic wastes."
2.  Standards for the Collection, Transportation, and
    Disposal of Toxic '.Vastes
  2-1.  The Range of Toxic Wastes
          Among industrial wastes, those treated as
toxic wastes are of four kinds (applicable in the condi-
tions listed "below):  sludge, slag, acid wastes, and al-
kaline wastes; related toxic materials are of seven kinds:
mercury and mercuric cozroounds, cadmium, and cadmium com-
pounds, lead and lead compounds, organic phosphate com-
pounds, Cr+0 compounds, arsenic and arsenic compounds,
and cyanide compounds.
     Table 1
     (1). Sludge produced at institutions or factories
          having the equipment described in the left-
          hand column of Table 1, or such products which
          have "been treated for disposal, which, include
          the materials mentioned in the right-hand

-------
     column of the table (limited to those which
     do not confirm with the standards set by Order'
     of the Prime Minister's Office).
(2). Authorized public sewerage sludge or such
     sludge treated for disposal, which include one
     of the above-mentioned seven kinds of toxic
     materials (limited to those v/hich do not con-
     form to the standards set by Order of the Prime
     Llinister's Office).
(3)ป Slag or slag treated for disposal, which in-
     clude some of six of the above-mentioned toxic
     materials, but do not include cyanide compounds
     (limited to those which do not conform to the
     standards set by Order of the Prime Minister's
     Office).
(4). Acid or alkaline wastes produced at factories
     and institutions owning the equipment described
     in the left-hand column of Table 1, v/hich in-
     clude materials in the right-hand column of
     the same table.
 (ITote:)  "Authorised public sewerage sludge," ac-
     cording to the Cabinet Order on Sev/erage Act

-------
        (1959,  Cabinet Order number  147) Number  13
        article 2,  is authorized sludge, but  as  of
        the present (August 1974), such authorisation
         has not been achieved.
2-2. Standards for the Collection, Transportation,  and
     Disposal of Tozic Wastes
 (1). Standards for Landfill Disposal
        1). As for sludge, authorized public  sewerage
            sludge, or such materials treated for dispo-
            sal (materials described in 2-1(1) and (2)),
            which include mercury and its  compounds, or
            cyanide compounds, and are judged  to  be toxic:
              (1). If these materials are  solidified in
                   concrete, landfill occurs  so  that
                   there is interception  of any seepage
                   into groundwater  and public \vater
                   areas.
              (2). If these materials are  not solidified
                   in concrete,  they are  to be detoxi-
                   fied and used in  general landfill, or
              (3). Through solidification in concrete,
                   the toxic materials are treated so

-------
          that they will not leak out;  if. they
          are non-toxic, general landfill say
          occur; if they are toxic, landfill
          nust occur in such a way that seep-
          age into groundv/ater is intercepted.
2), As for sludge, authorized public sewerage
    sludge, or these materials treated for
    disposal (materials described in 2-1(1)
    and (2)), which, include cadmium and cad-
    mium compounds, lead and lead compounds,
    organic phosphate compounds, Or   com-
    pounds, arsenic and arsenic compounds,
    and are therefore materials judged to "be
    toxic; and slag or slag treated for dis-
    posal, \vhich includes any of six of the
    toxic naterials except cyanide (materials
    described in 2-l(3))ป and are therefore
    judged to be toxic:
      (1). If they are reduced to non-toxic
           materials, general landfill may
           occur, or (otherwise)
      (2). Seepage interception landfill must

-------
           take place.
3). Y/hen sludge landfill occurs,  the  follow-
    ing standards are prescribed, regardless
    of whether materials are toxic or non-toxic:
      (1). In cases where sludge  landfill dis-
           posal occurs (excluding wet-type
           landfill), prior incineration using
           incineration equipment must occur,
           or the water content must  "be "below
           85*.
      (2). In cases where organic sludge
           (sludge removed from public sewers
           or river basin sewers, excluding
           materials digested using digestion
           facilities and those materials whose
           organic content is smaller than that
           of materials digested using digestion
           facilities; same below) is disposed
           of by wet-type landfill, prior in-
           cineration using incineration equip-
           ment must take place.
      (3). For  organic sludge or such sludge

-------
 •treated for disposal (excluding
 materials incinerated with an ig-
 nition loss of less than 15/ฃ, and
 those solidified in concrete:
  (a). In cases of landfill dispo-
       sal of wastes generally more
       than 40$ organic wastes,
       each landfill layer should
       be less than 50 cm. thick.
  (b). In general, in cases where
       it's less than 40$, each,
       layer should generally be
       less than 3 m. thick
Horeover, each layer should have a
surface cover of about 50 cm. of
sand and soil.  In cases of small
scale landfill disposal, however,
(landfill in an area of less than
        p
10,000 m  or of a volume less than
50,000 m-*), or in cases of landfill
disposal utilizing subterranean air
spaces, this is not to be applied.

-------
            Also,  along with the provision of
            ventilation equipment for the land-
            fill area and the removal of methane
            and other gases produced in the area,
            measures necessary to prevent the
            outbreak of fires should be prac-
            ticed.  But in cases of small scale
            landfill disposal this is not to be
            applied.
4) * Y/"hen landfill using industrial v/astes oc-
    curs, the following standards are applied:
       (1). llecessary precautions should be ta-
            ken to prevent offensive odors from
            emanating from the landfill site.
      .(2). Rats should be prevented from living
            on landfill sites, and mosquitoes,
            flies, and other harmful insects
            should be stopped from multiplying
            there.
       (3). Landfill sites should be enclosed
            v.'ith a fence and the fact that they
            are areas for the disposal of indus—

-------
                  trial wastes  should "be  indicated,
                  (At toxic  industrial waste  landfill
                  sites, that they  are areas  for the
                  disposal of toxic industrial
                  wastes.
             (4).  Landfill sites  should be  insulated
                  to protect public river "basins and
                  ground water.   But in cases of the
                  disposal of non-toxic industrial
                  wastes, when  the  necessary  precau-
                  tions are  taken to prevent  contam-
                  ination of public river basins and
                  groundwater by  landfill leachate,
                  this is not to  be applied.
             (5).  landfill disposal of acid and alka-
                  line wastes (described  in 2-1 (4))
                  is prohibited,  regardless of whe-
                  ther they  are toxic or  non-toxic.
(2). Standards for llarine Disposal
        1).  Sludge or authorized  public sewerage sludge
            (nai;erials described  in 2-1(1)  and (2)),
            slag (materials  described in  2-1(3)), or

-------
    acid, or alkaline wastes (materials described
    in 2-1(4)), which are judged to be toxic,
    oust not be disposed of in the oceans.
2). Sludge or authorized public sewerage sludge
    (materials described in 2-1(1).and (2)),
    which include cyanide compounds and are
    fudged to be toxic (but when including
    others of the six kinds of toxic compounds
    besides cyanide compounds, those materials
    fudged to be non-toxic), which have been
    incinerated with less than 15$ ignition loss,
    can be disposed of in Marine Area B.
3). Tf'hen sludge or authorized public sewerage
    sludge (materials described in 2-1(1) and
    (2)) which are judged to be toxic are soli-
    dified in concrete so that toxic materials
    included in the sludge will not leak, they
    nay be disposed of in Marine Area A.
4). V/hen sludge or authorized public sewerage
    sludge (materials described in 2-1(1) and
    (2)) which include mercury and raercurie
    compounds and are judged to be toxic, (but
                 10

-------
    wh.en including others of the five toxic
   . materials "besides mercury and its con-
    pounds and cyanide compounds, materials-
    judged to be non-toxic) are calcinated
    and thereby made non—toxic, they may "be
    disposed of in Llarine Area B.
5). Detoxified inorganic sludge (excluding
    water-soluble materials) and detoxified
    slag may be disposed of in Marine Area B,
6). Detoxified organic sludge, detoxified
    water soluble inorganic sludge, or detox-
    ified acid or alkaline wastes may be dis-
    posed of in Llarine Area C.
7). Even though materials may be sludge or
    acid or alkaline v/astes v:hich, according
    to articles 2) through 6) above, may be
    disposed of in the oceans,
      (1). If materials are types of oils,
           or
      (2). If materials are discharges from
           a phenolic resin manufacturing
           industry and contain phenols,
               11

-------
     they nay not be disposed of in the oceans.
8).  Llarine Area A, Marine Area B,  and Marine
     Area C, referred to in 2) through 6), will
     be called narine areas when indicated "below.
The standards concerning methods of discharge
when discharging wastes in any of the narine
areas is as follows:
Discharge Area

Marine Area A







Marine Area 3



Llarine Area C















Standards for Discharge
Liethod
1. Specific gravity
must be over 1.2
when discharging.
2. Discharge must not
take place when
vessel is moving.


1. and 2. from above,
and:
3. 17 o discharge in
powder form.
1. Discharge below
•she surface of the
ocean.
2. Discharge while
the- vessel is

ncving.









Related Standards

Precautions
must be taken
which are nec-
essary to in-
sure that the
wastes sink as
quickly as
possible, and
that they ac-
cumulate as
sediment.
Discharge
waste in
small quanti-
ties at a
tine and take

necessary
precautions •
to insure
that the
wastes dif-
fuse in the

ocean as
quickly as
possible.
H>H>fel
H0{3
O p &
440
P P
O <{
P H) O
Cits'
H- c+
P pj
P 4 <
P H- 0
, |3 H-
i 1— *
cr'O
<[> P
O
4 Q
O
cฑ fr1
f3* O
4
O O
Hj

P 0
4 4
H* O

O H-
CQ


                12

-------

-------
        9).  In general,  even with industrial waste a
            which can "be disposed of  in  the oceans,
            marine disposal should not occur when no
            special hindrance  to landfill disposal
            can "be found.
 (3).  Other  Standards
        1).  Collection,  transportation,  and disposal
            of wastes should "be  carried  out so  that
            the wastes will not  fly about or drift
            away.
        2).  The establishment  of waste treatment
            facilities should  "be carried out in •
            such a T?ay that there is  no  fear of a
            rise of hindrances to the preservation
            of the environment in which  we live.
        3).  Precautions  should he taken  so that there
            is no fear  of wastes flying  about,  drift-
            ing av;ay,  or giving off offensive  odors
            from transportation vehicles,  receptacles,
            or pipelines.
2-3.  Standards Established by Order of  the  Prime
      Llinister's Cffice  Concerning Toxic Industrial
      "•Yastes
                       13

-------
            The basic standards are those stated in 2-1,
parts (1) to (3).  In order to test wastes for levels, of
toxic materials, solubility tests are used for landfill
disposal; for marine disposal, slag, inorganic author-
ized sev/erage sludge, and inorganic sludge (excluding
water soluble materials) are inspected by solubility
tests, and organic sludge, water soluble inorganic
sludge, and organic authorized public sev/erage sludge
are inspected by content tests.  Acceptable values to
be detected in such inspections are indicated in (1)
and (2) below.  The inspection methods will be described
later in section 2-4.
   (1). Standards for Acceptable levels Detected "by
Solubility Tests


2
3
4
Alkyl Llercuric Compounds
Kercury or Her curie
Compounds
Cadmium or Cadmium
Compounds
Lead or Lee.:!
Compounds
Organic Phosphate
Compounds
No detection of alkyl mer-
curic compounds
No detection of mercury
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 0.3 mg. cadmiun
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 3 mg. lead
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 1 mg. organic
phosphate
                         14

-------
    Cr   Compounds
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 1.5 mg. Cr*6
    Arsenic and Arsenic
     Compounds
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 1.5 mg, arsenic
 7;  Cyanide Compounds
In 1 1. of sample fluid,
less than 1 mg. cyanide
   (2). Standards for Acceptable  Levels Detected "by

Content Tests


i
2
3
4
Alkyl Mercuric Compounds
Mercury or Mercuric
Compounds
Cadmium or Cadmium
Compounds
Lead or Lead
Compounds
"
Organic Phosphate
Compounds
5 ! Cr+0 Compotinns
6
••••'
7
t
Arsenic and Arsenic
Compounds
Cyanide Compounds
No detection of alkyl
mercuric compounds
In 1 kg. of test mater-
ials, less than 2 mgป
mercury
In 1 kg. of test mater-
ials, less than 5 mg.
cadmium
In 1 kg. test mater-
ials, less than 50 mg.
lead
In 1 kg. test materials,
less than 5 mg. organic
phosphate compounds
In 1 kg. of test mater-
ials, less than 25 mg.
Cr+6
In 1 kg. of test mater-
ials, less than 25 mg.
arsenic
In 1 kg. test materials,
less than 5 mg. cyanide
                        15

-------
  2-4.  Methods of Inspection of Toxic Llateriala Included
        In Industrial 7/astes
            Using solubility tests and content  tests,  in-
spection of toxic nsterials included in industrial wastes
occurs according to the f ollov/ing procedures:"
   (1). Preparation of Sample Fluid for Solubility Tests
        Preparation of Test Materials
          1). Sludge—4 Sample as it is and remove for-
                        eign substances such as pebbles,
          2). Materials Other than Sludge—*
                Particle diameter less than 5 mm.  •-ป
                        Sample as it is.
                Other materials—*
                        Sample as they are, and after
                        pulverizing, make particles
                        larger than 0.5 mm. and smaller
                        than 5 mm. by using sieves num-
                        bers 32 and 4.
         Regulation of Test Fluids
          1). Sludge for landfill disposal (excluding
              offshore land reclamation disposal), slag,
              or these materials treated for disposal—4
                         16

-------
      Uix the test materials (g.)  and solvent
      (HC1 or COo added to pure water so that
      the pH is above 5.8 and "below 6.3) (ml.)
      in a weight-volume ratio of 10#, and
      make more than 100 ml, of the fluid mix-
      ture.
2). Slag for offshore land reclamation dispo-
    sal, sludge treated for disposal, slag
    solidified in concrete, sludge calcinated
    for marine disposal, or slag—^
      Mix the test material (g.) and solvent
      (NaOH, NapCO,, or NaHCO-. added to pure
      water so that the pH is above 7*8 and
      belov; 8.3) (ml.) in a weight-volume
      ratio of 10^, and make more than 100 ml,
3). Sludge made fron slag treated for disposal
    in offshore land reclamation, sludge, and
    inorganic sludge for marine disposal (ex-
    cluding 7/ater soluble materials)—^
      Add  solvent (liaOH, Na2CO-j, or KaHCO.
      added to pure water so that the pH is
      a"oove 7.8 and "below 8.3) to the test
               17

-------
             materials  so  that there  is a weight-
             volume  ratio  of  3$  solid material  (g.)
             included in the  fluid mixture.   (For
             soliis  included  in  sludge, use  the
             weight  of  materials remaining- after
             elaboration.
     Solubility of Toxic  Materials
             Stir or shake  continuously for  6 hours
        at normal temperature  (about  20ฐ C.) and
        normal pressure (about 1  atmosphere).
     Preparation of Sample Fluids
             Measure and take  off the  precise  volume
        needed for examination froa the  supernatant of
        the liquid regaining after the solvent and
        test fluid have been filtered  using Type  5-C
        filter paper and   put in a centrifuge below
        5000 rpm. for 20 minutes.
(2). Preparation cf Sample Fluids for  Content  Tests
     Preparation of Test Materials
             Take up the test materials as they are
        into a beaker (500 ml. volume), and,  using a
        noii-metal spatula, crush the small lumps;
     Regulation of Test Fluids
    T
                      18

-------
  pass the homogeneous liquid through a synthetic
  fiber sieve (do not use a metal one) v/ith 2 mm.
  apertures, then measure off the necessary vol-
  ume (more than 200 g.) accurately from the
  liquid which, passed through, pour it into a
  graduated cylinder v/ith a cock attached (1 1.
  capacity) and add pure v/ater to make 1 liter
  in all.
Preparation of Sample Fluid
  1). In cases of sample fluid relating to sludge
      v/ith a Cr   content—4
         Take off the necessary, volume of sample
         fluid from the supernatant of the liquid
         regaining after the test liquid has been
         filtered through a glass filter and the
         solvent and test liquid have been cen-
         trifuge d at less than 5000 rpm. for 20
         minut e s.
  2). In cases using other materials—>
         After making the test fluid homogeneous
         by vigorously shaking and mixing it,
         quickly measure and remove the precise
                  19

-------
             amount needed for explanation.

(3). Method of Examination of Sample Fluids

       Abridged. (Corresponds to the method  established

       by JIS).

(4). Calculation of Density
Solubility
  Tests
Content
  Tests
Sludge to be used for
landfill disposal (ex-
cluding offshore land
reclanation disposal)
(linited to materials
with a water content
greater than 85fo).

Other materials
Sludge (limited to
materials with a
water content of
more than 95$).

Other sludge
                                       -   --
                                       ~   x
                                              15
                                                -p
               x 10-
                                    ci =.
c  = -_
 2   VxW
ฐ2 ~ VxY/
                                               100-P
                                               10
       Where:

           A:  Weight of toxic materials tested (rag.)

          C-^:  -Density of toxic materials (number of
                ng. dissolved in 1 1. of sample fluid)

          $2*  Density of toxic materials (number of
                mg. included in 1 kg. of test material)

           P:  V/ater content of test materials

           V:  Volume of sample fluids (ml.)

           W:  Weight of test materials (g.)
                      20

-------
3.  [Management of Disposed Household Appliances V/hich
    Contain Parts ".Yhich Utilize PCBs
  3-1.  History
          Betv/een 1954 and the end of 1971, about 53,000
tons of PC3 v/ere used in Japan, but the Kanemi PC3 Poi-
soning Incident served as a turning point, and since
1971, there have "been:  (1) a ban on the use of PCB-
containing carbonless copying paper; (2) a ban on recla-
mation use of PCB-containing carbonless copying paper;
(3) a report concerning the circumstances of PCS use by
makers of large machines such as transformers and con-
densers, and by users and importers, and instructions
to make up  records;  (4-) with a series of measures
such as the suspension of production of transformers,
condensers, and thernal media (August, 1972), a plan, of
countermeasure treatment concerning a large proportion
of the intended use was formulated.
     On the one hand, before the ban on use, 800 tons
of PCBs were used in  condensers in hone electrical ap-
pliances; yet when v;e take into account their years of
durability, it is estimated that at the present  (1973)
there is still about  540 tons in all households.
                          21

-------
     PCBs do not leak into the air or diffuse while
household electrical appliances are in use; moreover, .
at present it is thought that there is no environmen-
tal contani.n2.tion occurring "because of the landfill
and other types of disposal of discharged household
electrical appliances which occur in all municipali-
ties.  Still, the Ministries of Health and Welfare,
and International Trade and Industry carefully consi-
dered the tendency in disposal of household appliances
from the present onward, and, in hopes of entirely
preventing environmental contamination in the future,
"began in August 1973 to supervise local public organi-
zations and related producing organizations in taking
PC3-titilizing parts out of household electrical appli-
ances v/hich contain then prior to disposal.
  3-2.  The Products in Question
          The products currently in question are limited
to three kinds:  television ("both "black and white and
color), air conditioners, and electric ranges.  The
PCBs used in these three kinds of appliances make up
95/= of all PCBs contained in all household electrical
appliances.  There are comparatively many large manu-
                         22

-------
facturers of these items, and their organizations for
the removal of parts containing PCBs are considered to
be reliably structured.
  3-3.  Removal of Parts Containing PCBs
          In principle, since long ago the municipali-
ties were to carry out the collection, transportation,
and disposal of v;aste household appliances, but in
relation to the appliances which contain parts using
PCBs:
   (1). At the tine of disposal, the removal of parts
        utilizing PCBs must occur in advance under the
        responsibility of the maker.
   (2). The maker will store the removed PCB-utilizing
        parts for the present until an appropriate dis-
        posal method is decided upon.  Still, since
        this does not include all household appliances
        in general use, for the purposes of distin-
        guishing then, the Llinistry of International
        Trade and Industry will compile a list of
        household electrical appliances which include
        PCBs.
          The precise methods of removal of the PCB-
                          23

-------
        utilising parts "by the maker have been decided
        by conferences between the makers and local
        governments.
  3-4.  The precise ne-iiocis for removal of the PCB-
    izing parts decided upon at the conferences of lo-
cal governments and makers fall into the following two
general types:
   (1).  A method by which the makers would be contacted
         by the municipalities and v/ould examine and re-
         move the parts at the place v/here they had been
         collected from the municipalities.
   (2).  A method by which the makers would be contacted
         by the consumers who want to dispose of the
         household electrical appliances, and, after
         examining whether there are any PCB-utilizing
         parts, and removing them if there are, the
         makers would attach a voucher in an easily visi-
         ble part of tr.e appliance to be disposed of..
                            24

-------
 o
 ฃ

 o
 ฃ*)
 C3
 r~

 ป-w

s

 o
         c
         •5
         Q.
 o
C/3
 O
 o
                              ON
 O
•*^
 cซ
• r~4

.>,

Q

 W3

 g
 C3
 I*
 W)
 O


ฃ

 •*^
 c
 OJ

 ฃ
                                                              C3

                                                              G
                                                              C3
                                                              0)
                                                             s—ป
                                                              c^)
                                                                       0)
                                                                       Ui
X
-4-*
ป—ซ
 CJ
 V

ffi

(4-4
 O
                                                                               c
                                                                               a>
                                                                               o

                                                                                o
                                                                                C/5
                                                                                O
                                                                                c
                                                                                a
                                                                                o-
                                                                                C3
                                                             CO

-------
—     ri
=      <
•
5
2
~

^

j^1
r-
—
—
'^
Z
^j
> ^
r ฐ s
[ ฃ ง
' = -^
1 1 .S
: a. v
i
! S ^







"c
&
C
ca
E
ฃ
c
Cl
_c
t
^i
^
- j
5:


1
6


—
^

t
jz
K}
so
c
"^
u
•CZ
2
I dfi
C
•5
"u
L.
M
"S
rs
-3
C
n
^
ซ >%

"n
Cr
w.





































i_
*,

*•
r
i
X
C

C

••
CM
c
c
c
1
2
0,
&
••
0

i
2
ซ.
M
CJ
CJ
c
_ฃ
V
ฃ.
&
C
0
1
^J

5f
.=
•-
a
~
*0
o
2
&.
u
•—
2
~

^

—
                                                                            il

-------
                     t—  ซปJ  I  ^  —ซ ^-  •—

                      I  H   I  I   II
           S
  ••*    fs    *     ^i
  |||-   |     |

s'H -3 S*5   21
|^ 5 3 =|   = ง
                         •j
                         a
                                      p
                                      i
                                      I
                                   Is
                                   (^  ^J
                                         a
                                                    CO
 E
 n
-LL.
                                                                                   c
                                                                                   u
                                                                                   E
                                                                                              u
                                                                                 o-c    -c
                                                      --1
                                                                      o
                                                                                   g.
         2*1
                                                            r** —
                                                            Oc
                                                            i. o
                                                            c '
	   o

.•ง   O
s-  =3ซ
                                                                              .2
o.i~   o=   ฃ ~   ฃ^j<    o c  .3   2-^2—  25  2'So:S  n  ^
o
"5
                                                  c ^
                                                  5
                                                                               -
T3 I
ซ U  u M




I |  I |

-Sa "*  .!s ""
O    Q
                                                    V


                                                  •5 -3

-------
z
 •5
          c
          r-
                      - ri
                     ~ x
                             C^ T3   '    w".
                                                                   •    -C
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     o>
                                                                                                     oc
                                                                                                     c-"
                                                                                                  -  oe
                                                                                                     so
                                                  3C



                                                  TT
                                                                                           00     I
                                                  o
                                                  r-
                             w •

                             >x
                                                                       r~
                                                                       o

v>

r-i
                                                                                 -O
                                                                                 d
!    9   -
    ri
                                                                   !    d
                                                                   ;    "i
                                                                   .    o    '
oo     !
                              o

                              r-
                                                                                                     00
                                                                                                     oo
                     SO

                     TT
                     OC
                                                                                                               90
                                                                                                     ฐ*.
                                                                                                     o"
                                                                                 o
                                                                                 d
                                                                                       —,=,--*-ฃ
                                                                                                     ri
                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                                     oo

                                                                                                     o
                                        •o


                                        o
                                 IS

                                  O

                                  oo
                                                                                                                         Is
                                        S    i
                                         as
                                         r"<

                                         -o
                                         -T

                                         fi

                                         \j-.
r-i
ri
                                                                                 p^
                                                                                 d
                                                                                                     q

                                                                                                     so
                                        •o
                                        "a
                                         •™ซ   I
•L. H "d . ?i : *
— " "~" **"• "^
11* ^ * ; ^ ri
? Z: ~ is- ri >n
^ — • ff. ~^ -~ o • ^
^ -r —- -r oc r—
""' -*.•? —
1 ~~
•
•
' _r •
= - ^ * !
<"l r^.
— " 1 ^
— r-
^r ^
f*'* C*





!
t
r-. . r^
•
oe
00
o ^
<*••
o
ri , ri
K-" >X
*"'








T)
•a
S i
"* i


i

i
— ! O
S S '
—
• '-
=
1 *•
C *-
i = ~ฃ
i —
i ^
J -^
jฃ
1 i
^ 21
— 3
'c
: i
^
I
— -ฃj
— "2


—
1-
•^

f w
t s
1 "O
i X

i 0
1 U.
I ^
! i

5 o '
O

._
*3
•yj
Q
a.
^

5
'f|
E*
a. o
                                                                                                                                                    I

                                                                                                                                                   CM'

                                                                                                                                                    t

-------
                                                                                         c
                                                                                         rt
       o r-
ป
O
r-i
 60
 c

'•i

 o
       3
      z
                       s     o
                       —     Cl
                                     o     a
                                   2     5

                                   C     M
                                                                                         O.

                                                                                         I
                                                                                         u

                                                                                         1
                                                          O     O
                                                                               o
                                                                               H
                                                           ฃ

                                                           ป
 Z    =
•| x> o o — o ! o ! o o
— •— o 1 o ' r*. j g ' o o p
5 ] . j ! ! ! ;
>S'^:^ ~ ' 5 ~ = i ^ ง
= x j *=. =. ;; ~ ^ . - 5 -

^ — = v- O'C 9 o 5:o,g
'— >, ' t ; i
o'i^-'TJ-^ o'o o'o;O
•r -S ! & c* ! s- — s 5 "^ o
i
— 1
~ ~ -z c ^ ' 3C ^ x> CC:CNC>
•^ ~T r*ป ^ r** i^i C^ r*** T ^
— X^ — — ( r- 1 ^-i /"•ป. -gป Tf 10 V>
8
01
o
O
o
Ov
O
O
r-i
fN
r*
r-
8
(N
in
-:
ปN
O
o
0
u^
r-
r-"
                     -                    _„__,..
                     i""l    C?  •  r 1  i  '"?.   !  "'     "'     S     —
                     "
                                                   r-    d
                                                   r-  ;  o
 -     ^   -i
*™      r3   "*

~    ' el   '
 z        i  ^
<    i  -
    r-    "•.    3C    ir     —     3"
    -r     c    r~    c-     —     -M
                                                                                      I      I

-------
                  5-Year National Program for Installation of Refus* Incineration Plant*
130.000: 4-
              lปit/U
                          !   "   = 104.430 x. I 200 * c. d
                                                                                            III. 110.13 I i >l
                                                                                 (111
   IOO.CCO-
    •ic :co -
     SO.OOOl
     -0.300-
 >
5C.OOO-

      i

-:coo'-



.-0.000 *
 ^   :o.ooo'-
     : o.ooo r
1 s-
                                                                       104.01 2 ซ/"> : J    i D)
                            i 1)1 s il ( x 1/S3
                          (A)
                     49.406 t;d
                r—i  -6<*.430x722?.'C-d
>5:.5o: t j    a:}
} it i = l!3)x ISTt
1 44.465 t J j ! 1
\SlAtY 1){Y 'r * 1 '
t \ *"\ ' \ *V r ' t ! f
4

i
! i
r\\ !
\\y\ i .
27.686t,J
(0ปปiC) x I "'•"•
'
\
_tC) 22.1-J^i
.0 = 1 BIX 5cr;
i. . .1 _ 1 .1 -! 	 1 	





t
| i
i i







.
;
i
1
i
i
i i
L. I—I
Capacity of
Incinerator installed
for 1967-1971


= 34,081 t/d
=134,000 t/d]



1 | LI
                                                                                              Capacity ot"
                                                                                              tnctncrulor to he insulted
                                                                                                       tor Iซ)7I  1975
                                       J56.133 t.'J[
                                       (newly built 56.133 t/d)
                                                                                                            Scrap and built
                                                                                                  i?s-:!-ini    (total)
             1966    1967   1968    1969    1970
          Year    • - — - r- - -
                                                                1972    1973   1W    W75
                            2nd 5-Year National Program >.
                                                             3rd 5-Year National Program

-------













a
a
*^ป

•
~
"o
0*
7*
s
^
J->
ฃ



^^
.—
s
E
3
^^
"^
^
ฃ
C?
*x
ฃ3
0
e
o

"i/j
a
c.
ฃ
3
u



























t^ ฐฐ. ฐ.
C* r*"l OO
— m
i
4
i
-,1
= l r-> f>
=> j — O
i i
i
s! "•• r-

i
i

i
jj j
 ' | J. 4
?2 . ™
; .f ; p
rr ! rv)
!


0 ' T
•q- ' 'ri

.!,
fV, .ซ
;
j
•


q ', ป
^* t ^*
i
i
i
'
'

c oo
~ *T
I
i
1
i -

— -T
r-> , rปi
I
| ;
[ i




V: O
''I ~~:
i ,

1 !





C* "".
r | •-*•.


i

•/• ".
**". *^".











5

—
^
^c

r- __..
r* x
ป. ^


CD




_

=0
C5





r-ป
^J






x
, ^J




!
-r
_^
1






—
^
t





j

>/-. r~
c: GJ



1
' T =>
— O
'








>



E
™
^

y ^
— -rf
-^ - —
j









^
i

u

*


^





C
r*



i

w







i
-





i



C*
^



i
O
J _
\
s
i








1






^
.5
-•*. -









i
i
5
i

3
>

;

3



3






•i
•i







V*-
r.|








ri
**•,




_
*-j











_^

>
~
"?
••ซ
=^J
^
H
*

\^
^
vS
r


V
—.
f*
ex
n-





01
1 f.
r*


''
i

! S.
__I
i ~1




^s
_J
! -^,


>



r^J
-T

t
i





**i
^
•*".



—
•M.
***,










O
'• .3

J^
t^
— •
^3
i Ij
1"






1









3
i
•t





o
r*-l





5N
_;







.



t





r->
fl

t
1
1
•
• o
ri













y
.2
~
t.
~
Sj
1



















ป
"a
3
i-i
^
C3
O
so
VI
C3
•a
.a
'ซ
-2
0
















r-
ri




o
i <"'











j;

—
~
_-

_j
i
i:


in



oo
\o

p~
vC





—
^






1















!
















*


i














f.
•^
, ™


en
fS
00


TT
oo
3O

oo





ซ-;
o\
CX>





U1
O
r—




r*
f^'
t-






•*
^
oo







o
r*^
X



*

r-















*~m
' 2.
t"Z
' ~
J 	

















































.


:

|

,
1














y
^i
^
7
•ง
~
u
c
S



r-

*







r
n









n















'





^*
i ~
' 5
—
' •=
(

*






*•
•ฃ
?
a
T3
u
i^H
a
M
u





30
6





<^-
c>







0
C)








—
MW




q
ป


















••
y;
























o
o





•^f
— ;







q
•w








so
ci




^
ปk







•

I
i






1 J^
1 ^
i ™
-f
























VI
^





O
f-I







n
f*-








O;
O




v>
^iป
— '












- ^
1 *••
' fjF
\
ฐ^
1 -ซ-
1
1 ~

vCl



f-4
f^l


^





00
*o






n
0





1








1









1





1





f
i




1




f

i **
. V
o


5



sq
m.


ฃ1





tn
ci






in
f%
 C4
t

t



t








ir_
' 3
^c

[








1






I








fN
ci







^f
ซN
ci

i



u
w
c
3
o

-------
          =
               ซ> o
               5 5r
                 o 5
                 S -
                _
               — V *•
               ~ a. i
    /. o
                               = 1  r^
                               _2   c>
oil

*i!
  -:  9
    c o-'
    o *c
       ii
•SS
II

H



<
ir

ir.
                           :!*-•;ฃ5 ..*
                                                                 o
                               x' i
                               — -3
              **  ^^





       -'"~ r i  o ™ ^ p*-
       ." I " ^ , -i. — _*' ^- !

-------
    r-
    0-
                     a
                     o
           3
           cr
                                                                                                O     ซ
                                                                                                u     ฃ;

                                                                                                ซ•    ~
                                                                                               3  2
                                                                                               •ง  a
                                                                                                ซ  w
_t;
'*
o
o
2
5
-^
ฃi
o
Z
iป
\j
ซ
w • — .
.2! "H
c/5
Q
o
•->
<_
"i ฐ

J -2
g
.0
ฃ
i
;i
? .=
1
5'
?3
"o
iM
_5
o
.5
J3,
]p,

.b
<;
5
T3
"^
i
i

X
O
•—
~o
i;
•3
C
U=
C
5 —
•— ~
= r
'x
o
3?
"o
Gฃ
u.
I
y
^
VI
•ti
^5
u*
S
c
V.
'-i
O ^ T
H. Cj x
-5 0 ซ•
S3 "™* rs *•
i!Z A i_ "-^
3. -S — ~ '
1 S| |J
= ~ "3 *- ฃ ^
I i ง 1 3 r'
ฃ x _; S" 5 ^
I f 1 P € f
^ o- t- cr Ui
•^
                                                                       -i
                                                                       g>    -
                                                                       -    +
                                                                       O
                                          s  5 s
                                                                               ao   3



                                                                                I   n
                                                                                             \J



                                                                                             &
                                          =   .  c --  .

      o   =

      o   ซ
     =   =  *

     111
     —   F   n
      n   ^  d
     "a.  n  "3
 "I  —   5  —

 ซi   ฐ   —  -_

1j  5   S   o
si   S   ^   >•
              O
              ^  =3
              .E  ฃ
              -3  "5
              ij  u

              :?  ^^


              c  i:
              "~  .—



              U
                        c.  c
                        O   g
=•   "c  i.  S

=:    "a  •-  "
o    >  C
                        c   r:
                        v  ™

                        ฃ   c.
~    =  1   ฃ  *'    "C  "2  •'
2    =  >   -  T     ^  ^3  •".ป
-    aasx    •-?-ป
fe    ^  i.  •-  .i    ^2^i
                            *"•  .y
cs,
•ฃ  '->  -H
 .  E  t        2  ~u
-r  7  <     -  =  <
                                      -I
                                      d
                                      Si

                                      1
                                              1
                                              01
-V
*>
i* W

- 0
V* ** ; Efl
3 3 u
1 1
— 5
ง —
w
3
o


'o
3
I
i
(N
Q.
,0
5.
1
Q.
^o


r>ป
E
2
^
6
c
C9
1
ป
^3

•3
u

rs
"><
U
u.
O
13
a
e
a

rj
a
^i








c
o

S
•3

u
^
ซ*ป
1
ซs
C3,

"E
oo

O,



ป
a:*
b
n




u
X
o

o
to
"~







ป
5
Control
e
_s
"o
Jj


ฃ
I
^2
3
Q.


-------
f
i

1



r-ป
I-*
QS
W

a
r-
^\

. _
•^
<"
.ta
>ซ
;J
2
—
3
.ฃ
>•
^

r-
—
tj
v
^*
•*™
ฃ
it
^i
v;
o
I
w
ฃ.
*-
s
5
C
ja
"n
w
^

1
.21
"*ซ-\




.;"1

"S
i —
— ' — "^
"* ~fL
1*
~
'— ^
~ 0
=•' ^


— r*i ^4 c* O O r*- —
\f. **\ ^ ^ f^i */", *T O
^C w^ r*j *"" CQ "d* " (""*•
^ * ^v — i



O ^ i*. v". r-i f^ •"". X
or-xc^c\o — ^r
_ — rj ซ. ^- r-* n






5 5 -: 7 -x ^ ? c







^^^-^-Q,^, — ,.3.
^ง$?o"^x
2;aoซ"ปปt-p>-






5
wป IT
ง ~
™ ปฃ'ฃ = % ^ ?
.^ "5 • a ~ " i S ง

s/>
u
i 1
~ Cu
"-> c.
lil <



I~* : ™
p, *-.

*
j-^
?l *"!
<^i ~^


— . -n —
C- r— T
^ r- x




'J 2 5





c r o
•"-• T ^ 1







r- ^o —
T -c r>
C wi 0
__




b.
1
** 5

2 ^
••ซ -f.
3 ^
•; a
= " -JS
5 == c
u: U 35


F —
ซ ^
ป 5
v^ >— \



": S
Cl ..*
CN •
^ซ f^l
rf' C3 •
ฐ S
t*^ fป"i
30 i^



IO t*- C*> C^ O
r-i \s o r~ —
" " ""



r- TJ- ri ^i ^





\O O GS Tf O
t** OO 3O "^ ^f
— n >n






O ". — — O1-
— r-l r- ". O
K — 2 * 3




•
01
1
•S

3 *
3! ซ> o ^
?3 •" ^5 ซr 5*
i- c c a =
5 2 IS Z r
S ^ 3 H x


3
|
U.



ro ^
ฃ "~:
CO "^*

^,
•^. ri
r! —



^C — X
r- oc >/•>




r- c- •<-.
-: >: '/-.





O ro 3ป
^3 V% *^







3O f~ —
r^i — o
Sv OO O







y>
| |
11 i
CS -- 33


(A
U



T ?
9 p
r^ ~~

o T
r-i "
O f^1'
C 3ฐ
~


r-l x
O vn
s- oc



•- i r t






r- *r
5^ X
Tt IT,






^ . C*
3* r',
O P-
in C
O G
P"* W*







— Wป
I i
^ w
c ^
3 o


2
A
O


_f-u
C* ^
?i ^
; r** tHi
^<
1 ซ-. ~
. ""' ;*,
' = 2.
' =1 i
"~ "^


ซซ
^ 1
p^
/


_^






r i
r I •
•^ i









,










2
t-

-------



c



ฃ

ป
W
O

Q


i
|

!
>





•5
"3
3
; •"



ฑ
s
to
rT
i.


S?
•3
^
~
C
C

ฃ
as


S


0


^~

A
&
5


•3
o



— o
O CA
So
<* r1

3 3
QO

Q
Ji
i
5J;

9 -,

^

i




C 0 O 0 O


0 O 0 O 0


: o o o o





^ o* o* ir* ffป



SPSSS

-r —i" 4 CM
i aC — ซ**



ฃ i 5 •ฃฃ


^ 3C — <ฃ *^
*-, — ac o ac

i-i


v -i — r- ซ-i
-"




O O O O O


0 0 O 0 C


C C 0 0 C





il^ II



-535 2-
O* ae ซo p^ r—




^r *ซ — 35 T
vป m os ^r
t — M —



,H??2:
!

•• Z =. ฃ ฃ ฃ

1 '"'


. — T T 3 —
T T >/V
?



O 0 O O


O O 0 0 O


0 0 O O O





O O* OS O —



— 0*30 ปซ O
'O -v ซO O ae
^ *o r* "^ —

; *** ***
t
i
<ป so O f- ป*l
, 30 sO OO 9O ปn
(msA Os ซrt —

'

SiSII


= ฃ2-5

""


o ?i S ง ^
ฐ *** *"** ป ^




c o o o &


0 O 3 0 0


O 0 O O O





— — — — o


.
5 — ปS5
O Oซ v> *xi ^



!
!2lss=

J

;
i o* *** ^ r* •ฃ
*>ซ r^
.

^ SSr-S S S


1
1
t
2 ฃ ฃ S ?
~~ "*




o o o o o


0 O 0 O


o o





=>ฐ77-
aaiia

22;

Sซ-ปsoO O
Os O ^ rป





•ซr *N o> c— —
•tr -ป



so O ^^ w>
p* oo r* oo Os
fS V)


S^KSS




ฃJ ซ ซ•ซ p

^



0 0 O O


o o o o o


o o o o o





oปoe os oo o



ฃฃฃฃฃ
•O <*% sO G^"*

r*


O r* r- ป •*
Os C4 Vป ซO O
M — 00 — *•



WO — P- 00 ซ**
SA f^ *r oo


ssง?s

•M


O f~> O

?



o o c


o o o o o


O TOO





O — O O Os
r*. PH. r— r- so
Os Ov O* Os OS



•* "(T O* OO P--
— *n >o ^* •*




•* CO Os OS GO
vi ปo r* O O
*n



5S?l.s


1 ? -53 S




n ? S *





o o o o o


o o o o o


c o o o o





r- r- P* P- r*-
o> ^ os o* ^



~S3S-
vi o c* o* 9*
rjr*\o O



|S?II
—  OS Os Os



So o #*ป
r* ?* C4
w* ซ^*^0\




SO C-ป -^ ป/>
S S35
fV <•



m o^oo!^


*o o r* O
so ^* O ซO




2 ซ S^
1 */> O sฃ
































', i
1 1
1


i i




_  _ ซr
— -- _ ge ae c ป*".
j* .2 3 T wi *•. ?


  •
f • —. ,s -o ^ * o
— -r 5 X ac *•ป ac •
?• C 3* — rป -c
                                      Vซ.  <>.   
                                                                      e e'
                                                                      S.S

                                                     ปHi|!|
                                                     -- z M o a' "• *'
                                                                           81
                                                                          ซ s -
                                                                          ^u 3 0ฃ

                                                                          u ซ(
                                                                          ill
*n
•3|Z
||S

Jlls
.s *- ^~
w c* 2 5t


IIซ
|i"i
lป  s
stf!
sll-2
                                                                                 oo

                                                                                  I

-------




! !
i o I o i , ' *
1 — '-* ' *J '-> ! —

1
— ซ
i
ฃZ
3

2

so
J2
^
w — , — , — C.
rj -j ' !> o ' c.
I;- •= - : -
2 i 0 0 C =ป
c/; : c c ; c , o









i
t

1

J

|
i
: I
— * •
•y ' .'
~
•-
r
ฃ
^
3-
5
5
5
v
c
5
.ซ
>
rJj





g
—

,
j i
-.
i =
1 :>."ฃ.
! 31*"'
! "* —
i ^ " =
1 ^ '—!*=' "1



> p i * i -s
^ i ~ ! ""
z

I
o
1

_aj
O
e
o.
U1
"" P
o o

1
o
e
5.
0.
o
6
a,

•ง
•3
O
ttJ
a
O
w
E
•o
•*ป.
: 1 5

'
1
















1

E












e
! -2







*
a
I
"x
si
. E ฐ*
3 ' M "*
u 5 "*-
s : ii
o
ง
w

f . S 0

.0 j


-------
 e
UJ
_>
 u
.c
 o
 CO
 •3

 O?
  5
 a
                                                                                                                                                     I
                                                                                                                                                    o

-------










i



~

— w>
- O.
^ 3
^_ 0
2 -3
•^
ป
z
	
yi
V)
—
O
~
—
O
o
^^
. i*i
0
">

z
"I
o
•ป-
o
o

1
S
o
o
o


b
c
                                                   O

                                                   E
                                         S
                                         c.
;
' 'f~

s
i "3
:>
11
il
1 2
• v;


,
;









'
'


•
;
!
'






- Z.
\ 5
' **"



, 	
H



j;
V7 -ป
"5 vi
= ~
O
f
'ฃ


- -

=
ilj /^

x' C
•*•
~ -^
"™ o
w -



-—
"E.






/

f
;
/
;

/






ys
y:
^
w
—
S.
—






y
y
•^
t.
I:
_


in
3O
1
>A>
*







S 1
.2 s
0 S

^>. "^
^* U.
-J *>
j ,
i


!
i a ^
•-0
% '% = -
~ ~ = "5 "5
S C ~ "7 >
5 = 2-^5

e! S "3 •ง ฐ
ir. vo — S u
— U. uO



,


•y v; ' ซ•
^ /•. ">
2 3. ฃ
!_ •_ U.
C O • O
= — " E
E =. o.
=. c. • o.
". u-. , 00
i
' i '
, i
1 u-> j . U ! S ^ | g

1i "= ; J; "3 i 1
^_ — • 3 — t
^ — jฃ ซ I a>
•^ ; — •— cyi
"u
.ฃ>

o
_ง

1>
I
-o
—
la.
a.
S3
W
_Q
JซJ
"3
e
"5
•5
t/1
12

i
•3
1)
•a
1>
a.
ws
h*
,2
a>
_3
13
>
•s
ซ
•o
3
V)
0
ฃ
m~
•O
C


2 7 • * ~ \ ง
   I    >>  C  —
   '  -"=•  ฃ  .=
>,:    &  |  -5


}•   i  I  i
c i   *  s  =
                         Z  si
                                      S  c
                                      53  O

                                      *  |


                                      rs  O

                                      'C  .t



                                      1  S
                                     —  o
 o    c:


i     s
 n     G
 ao     ฃ
                                                               O

                                                              z

-------
                                                                                        s
                                                                                        o
-3  >•
 >-  X  —
•5:0 O
                  o
                  o
                  a
o

o
                   s.
                  in
                     O
                     ฃ
                                                  ง

                                                  Z

                                                  1
                                                  o
                                                                      c
                                                                      a
                                                                      u
                                                                     .a
                                   JL)


                                    W
                   3C


                   3C
                =O
                 1
                                                                          n
                                                                          BO
                                                                          C
                                                                         •5

                                                                         "o
                                                                          C
                                                                                        60
                                                                                        C
                    '*.
                    V.
         >ป   •     JS

         I   ;      *
!     <
i
               JC

               ri
                f.
                n
               ~  y

                6 -E
                5  -3
               •3  S
               :—   vป
0
E
E
ri






VI
Vt
Z>

O
s

c.
30

rป>
ad
O
r~




5
ฃ
c
ฐ>
c
u
u.
o
e
_o
n
t
U
(/;
•3
bfl
D.
3
O
b.
:0
ฃ
.5
^
"Q
:j
"o
ha
•J
JO
ฃ
3
C
u

•^
g
VI
'5
(M
O
c
_o
'n
>

3
:j
w
•f
f.
™
>
w
U
~
C
"o
>>
"^
3
cr
o
•**
O
•3
k.
fZ
rฐ

&
u
-5
C
C**
O
3
o
^^
•—
•a
a
73
Q>
U
5
n
3

'3
>
&
JO
u
>
ฃ
rs
o
jp
ซ
•o
^)
s
'j
3:
ฃ
u
^3
3
S
I*
to
~
—
&
V.
rt

.
>t
IM
U
~ฃ
















u
'u
kT
u
>
CJ
4-T
u
"3

ฃ
>,
2
y
O
3
^
u
rj
r3
_O
LM
fj
S
^
y

>ป
\m
U
i
VI
ป 'rt
T3
_C
ซ
D.
S
0.
O
*•*
"O
vi
3
93
U
w>

a
u
ฃ
c
S
a
u
D.
C
3
O
3}
hป
U
"i

Vt
'I
5"
e
u
5
'>
S

c
o
V)
g
O
                                                     I
                                                                               o
                                                                              Z
                                                                                                                             I
                                                                                                                            CM

-------

                        5   =  -S
.r?
'c
                        -i  —   a
                        is1-'
                                •
                        o  ~  -a

                        ฃ.   5   ฃ

                           ~
     c
     c
                           ~

                       r  ฃ  •?
                       ~   -f.  -j
                       *   —  '•-)
                       —  ~  -3

                       2  1  3
                       —-  —  W*

                        *  •=  ฃ
                         .
 rs


•3
 o

 I


zs

 o


p

 >,

-3
                                        J3

                                        'J

                                                      ii   1)
                                                      s  .a
                                        O
                                        U
                                                      =  .3
                                                      so  O

                                                     .ซ   c
                                                                               w>

                                                                 c-c^ c-     &


                                                                  ESS     1
                                                                 o  o o     "S
                                                                  u  u  u
                                                                  ao  so sa
                                                                  o  w  o  ฐ  2
                                                                  >>>—.**
                                                                  a  a  a  a  —•
                                                                            ba  C7
                                                                  >v >.  >ป  U  C
                                                                 rs ns  !ซ  c  . z>
                                                                  rj  a  a "Z  c
                                                                 •3 13  ~3  S  n
                                                                      n
                                                                     -3
                                        '-<  o
                                        ~  '*>
                                        ^  -i
                           .=   =    !ป   =

                                                     =  &

                                                     O  Q.
                          &0  ฃA ซ  ^ft ^& &S  oft bO ftp

                          EESEEEESE

                                        ^ — —  so O
                      00


                      00
                                                                    งง
                                                                    o^    I
                                          E  E
                                          o r*
                 ~   .•ฃ:ฃ"-'

                  s    c:  ~  '>
                 •••*    T~   jซ   ^%
^    H.'^'*l;>^-:=ฃ.-^i;i"3-6*'   —
                         _  ~;      x
                         •2 O      w

                         2 p  * •?
                         — O  U5 Z
                                                Uit  —
                             Wl  fc.

                             1  la
                            ฃc3s
 s
 u

 I
 n
 E
•o
 >  ซ>
-  S
 S  Q

5S
                                                                                                         ฃ
    o
 O  l~
 c  u

-C  A

 2  E
ฃ  3
                                                                                                             Q.


                                                                                                             O

                                                                                                             ft

-------
                         H
                        u
                        I H
                        11
                                                                 D
                                                                 C
                                                    o>
                                                    c
                                                    JD

                                                    "o
        O

        T3
        O

        "5.
        a.
   i   I
                                                o
                                                o
                                                E

                                                "5

                                                2
                                                o

                                                "5
    ~   "S
    ^   rt
    •a   3

    S   I
    CA   vป
    7^   o
    3   E?
    n.   _2
    •5   9
                                                                 3
                                so 2. '~ Z.
                                        1!  1
                               — =  2 2 O .
                     .s .s  >,
                       ; -i1^ o E
                       1 -5 'S '? E
                        3"3 E ซ
                                                                 =
                                                                ! _2
                                                                1 C.
ndu
       11   1

dId X x  -- ^   S
                                         0 O
                                        . 0 O
                                         — fป
                                    ฃ ฃ  ฃ ฃ ฃ3
                                                                     •3
                                                                     =
                                                                     O.
I   2^ "

^   c
^2   o
|   r  b!ฃ

1
u
•s.

                                                                            g
                                                                  3   F "2
                                                                 1   ง1;
                                                                  ;J   :" *

                                                                  •—  -- ~ 2 r


                      ~ -* "•
                                             2

                                             X
                                           v: 2
                                              "'  -3   -5 =^r:
                                              ป  s  . s i j s.
                                              C-.  -3 n  -3   -3 i

                                              &'  งsงMf
                                              S1.  *zo "Z~c. s f
                                              3  o.ซn-u-=?-5

                                              !;|il=fi

                                              1  ll.iiji
                                              h= •  "3 ฃ "= S-^5 —
                                              "o  S •= - 2- J -
                                              *  Fg=S--
                                                       s: Ss

-------
 pj;per t:o !^e or-^ sen ted. co:
"Tha Srjcor.d J-dpan-U.S. Conference on Solid WastG Kanager.ient"
Sepฑ3"b:.-r,  1974, i.'ashir.gtoa, D.C., U.S.A.
                          XV
     RESOURCE RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN JAPAN
                              by


                         SuJcehiro GOTOH


                              and •


                         Michio NAKAJIKU
            Office of Research and Development Programs
            Agency of Industrial Science and Technology
            Ministry of International Trade and Industry


                      Kasunigaseki, Tokyo  100
                          August, 1974
                                            X"
                                           Jf*  
-------
                            ABSTRACT
     The paper consists of essentially two parts; the first
deals with a general overview on resource recovery in Japan,
and the second with the resource recovery research and development
project currently underway at the Agency of Industrial Science &
Technology, M.I.T.I.

     In the first part, the historical background on the resource
recovery concept in Japan is reviewed, which then is followed by
the current status and future trends with particular emphasis on
legal, social, institutional and economic aspects.  Recent tech-
nological developments of processing system aimed at resource
recovery from, the Japanese municipal refuse are also reviewed and
some problems regarding the technology encountered in the effort
are described.  In addition, an assessment of impacts of resource
recovery on the municipality and the country as a whole are dis-
cussed.

     In the second part, AIST's Resource Recovery Project is
described in detail:  Firstly, the basic project concept with its
objectives, Agency's responsibilities, the R & D organization and
the financing summarized is presented.  Secondly, the R & D program
areas are reviewed with the specific aim for each research theme.
Thirdly/ as the project is in its second year of Phase I term,
current progress and sor.e important results obtained from the
feasibility studies on the selected research topics are stated
and an interim evaluation is made.  Finally, currently proposed
Phase  II term of the Project, which shall start with the FY 1976
and las~ for three  to  five years is briefed to give some idea on
what the Agency expects before the resource recovery system is     ;
transferred to the  municipality and implemented in this country.

-------
     Phase II of the Project is essentially a demonstration of
alternative prototype resource recovery systems under the Japanese
socio-econoracal circunstances for the effective future implemen-
tation.

     Sor.e concluding remarks based on our AIST's project manage-
ment are also oresented.

-------
                         CONTENTS
ABSTRACT

    i. GENERAL OVERVIEW or RESOURCE RECOVERY IN JAPAN            3
BACKGROUND
  Waste Disposal and Public Cleansing Law                        6
  From Disposal to Resource Recovery                             8-
CURRENT STATUS AND TRENDS
  Japanese Municipal Waste for Resource Recovery                 10
  Municipality's Trends for Resource Recovery                    17
  Trends Observed in  (Central) Government's Efforts              21
  Trends in Industry                                      '       24
RESOURCE RECOVERY TECHNOLOGY
  Characteristics of Resource Recovery Systems                   28
  Problems Identified in Resource Recovery R & D                 31
r:Oy-TSCH>:CLOGICAL PROBLEMS
  Economic Factors                                               34
  Social Factors                                                 36

    II. THE AIST'S R & D PROJECT ON RESOURCE RECOVERY            38
C'JTLISS OF THE PROJECT
?. & D PROGRAMS
  Selection of the Program Fields                                41
  Brief Review of Elemental Technology Fields                    45
  Target cf Major Selected R & D Programs      '                  52
DEVELOPMENT STATUS O? MAJOR R & D PROGRAMS
  Lev; Temperature Shredding and Separation of Plastic Wastes     54
  Cryogenic Shredding Technology for Bulky Wastes                54

-------
  Air Classification and Related Sorting System               55
  Se~i-vat Pulverizing and Classification Process             56
  Magnetic Fluid. .Sorting Technology for Non-ferrous Metals    57
  Fluicii zed-bed Thermal Decomposition Process for            "  ~
     Oil Recovery                                             58
  Fluidized-bed Pyrolysis/Conbustion Dual Reactor
     System for Fuel Gas Recovery                             59
  Conceptual Design of a Total System for
     Resource Recovery and Reuse                              60
IKE PHASE II PLAN
  The Need for Phase II of the Project                        61
  Outline of Phase II Plan                                    62

CONCLUSIONS                                                   64
 (APPENDIX)
       FURTHER INFORMATION ON ENERGY RECOVERY PROGRAMS
A. Hydrogenation and Catalytic Pyrolysis Technology
   (Government Industrial Development Lab., Hokkaido)
3. Fixed-bed Pyrolysis Technology of Cubitted Waste for
   Fuel Gases (National Research Institute for Pollution
   and Resources, Kawaguchi)
C. Corr.bir.ed Reactor Pyrolysis System
   (National Chemical Laboratory for Industry, Tokyo)
D. Fluidized-bed Pyrolysis Process for Oil Recovery
   (Hitachi, Ltd)
S. Fiuidized-bed Pyrolysis/Combustion Dual Reactor System
   for Fuel Gas Recovery  (Ebara Manufacturing Co., Ltd)

-------
       RESOURCE  RECOVERY  FROM MUNICIPAL  SOLID  WASTE  IX  JAPAX

                               by

                 Sukehiro GOTOH and Michio  NAKAJIKU*
       The  present report discusses,  among  various  problems
  regarding the  solid waste,  recovery of materials  ana  energy
  resources out  of municipal  solid wastes.   The  discussion restricts
  itself  to the  resource  recovery aspect and will only  cover the
  collection and disposal whenever the necessity arises.

       On the occasion of the First Conference in Tokyo, Mr. John
  P.  Lehman,  of  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, presented a
  report  entitled "Resource Recovery: An Assessment", and we were
  given a good opportunity to grasp a wide  variety  of activities and
  efforts being  made  in the resource  recovery field in  the United
  States.  In response to Mr. Lehman's paper, a  brief comment  was
  made, at  the time,  by (late)  Mr. Rycsaku  Shimizu  of Japanese
  Agency  of Science & Technology.  In this  comment, Mr.  Shimizu
  pointed out that the systems approach to  the problem  which he
  considered most important was lacking in  the.Japanese effort.

       Based on  these discussions of  the First Conference, this paper
  reports,  in the resource recovery field in Japan, what have  been
  done so far, how is the current status, what are  the  problems and
  what are  being planned now.

       The  paper consists of  the following  subjects.  In the first
  part, an  outline of resource recovery and reuse will  be presented:
  Various efforts from local  autonomous, consumers, central government
  and industry sectors are summarized. And then problems and  barriers
  to resource recovery identified in  this country will  be discussed
* Both Dr.  Gotoh and Mr.  Makajiku are at the Office  of  Research
  anc Development Programs, A.I.S.T., Japanese Ministry oฃ International
  Trace a:.d Industry.

-------
                                                       -2-
with emphasis first on the technological and secondly on non-
technological aspect.

     In the latter half of the paper, AIST's effort since the
FY 1972 is summarized:  This is an essentially technological
R & D effort of the central Government, although its related
sccio-economical matters and the impacts assessments are
concurrently dealt with in order to implement the system effectively.
Emphasis is thus placed on the comprehensive treatment of the subject

-------
i.  GENERAL OVERVIEW o? RESOURCE RECOVERY IN JAPAN

              BACKGROUND

     As in the United Stares, resource recovery,  or recycling,
in Japan has taken various forms in the past.   Let us call this
stagewise change in the recycling form as "a level of recycling".
The lowest level of recycling, by which we mean,  for example,
returning bottles tc the food or liquor store,, or selling bundles
of old newsprint, cloths, bottles, or the likes to a ragman, has
long been and is now practised in every city or town.  At this level,
one does not need any special systematized effort, instead simply
follows the tradition of the society with a little effort.  To some
extent, however, it is said that this depends on the life style or
more general value concept of those days.  In Japan, the idea'to
use things effectively and repeatedly was once considered a virtue
and the public awareness on the scarcity of natural resources in
this island country enhanced the idea.  At least, this was very
true till the end of the World War II.  And for another decade or
so in the-postwar society before Japan emerged as an industrial
                                                                    ซ4.
ccur.-ry in the world, this life style had been still considered a
virtue.

     For the past 10 to 15 years, however, this level of recycling
has been diminishing gradually, almost without being noticed.
This period of time turns out to have been the time when mass pro-
duction and mass consumption in Japan started and were actually
taking its shape, and concurrently the per capita GNP or income, or
labor cost was sharply increasing.  This general circumstances and
chance in public awareness unfavored the recycling and, because of
higher costs of repairing or storing, one started discarding such
things as cnce unthinkable; refrigerators, TV sets, relatively new
                                                                    t
furnitures, etc.

-------

             shows an increase in the daily percapita production
of municipal solid waste  (national average) as compared with
changes in the tOual population and net GNP values.  It is known
that uh^ percapita generation is strongly related to the net GI-IP,
whose linear relationship was confirmed.  Along with this large
growth rate of percapita was~e generation during this period, a
sharp change in the waste composition, both physical and chemical,
was observed.  This chance owed to the fact that the collected
waste cc-r.tair.ed more and more plastics, bulky wastes, mingling
industrial wastes and other newer (and normally hard-to-treat and
dispose) materials.

     VJith all this historical background, little attention has
been paid, till recently, on much higher levels of recycling~or——
reclaimation, such as heat reuse and electric generation out of
waste, materials extraction (paper fibers, ferrous and nonferrous
metals, etc.) from mixed collected waste stream, or incinerator
residues processing.

     Cniy exception for this level of recycling is the high-speed
mechanical composting, which is a conversion-type resource recla-
mation from mixed municipal waste.  As early as back in 1956, and
for the following ten years, more than 30 plants for composting had
been constructed and operated successfully in Japan.  However,
by the end of 1971, the number of plants was counted only 28, of
which mostly suffered frcm economical problems.  As now, seven
planes remain barely in the whole country.

     Although it is anticipated/that the compsting will come into
•che light again(oy many people/, this past failure appears to be
predominantly economical; especially in contrast v/ith chemical
fertilizers.  Farmers once were heard to be complaining about
contamination of compost with such non-compostables as glass or    !
olastics.

-------
i:.2L2 1   YEARLY CEAITJE IN AVERAGE PZR CAPITA WASTE GSNERATIOII
Year
- " <~
1351
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1965
1969
1970
copulation
do4)
c 7 c a
X , >^ฐ
9,473
9,561
9,654
9,748
9,340
9,952

10,131
10,257
10,372
1971 _ 10,^54
Average Per
Capita
Generation
(s)
ฐM
491
498
613
660
695
712
• 755
315
870
910
960
G^.T (Net)
(billion yens)
20,348
24,275 •
24,610
27,783
30,788
32,451
36,286
41,140
46,734
52,522
57,441
60,723
         Source:   Minis~ry of Health & Welfare Data

-------
     Nevertheless, the need for resource recovery  at  various
levels is increasingly emphasized, as  the r.av:2r  value concept
based or. essentially such idea a.c;  "the Spaceship Zarth"  is
becoming accepted in this country.  Tc, illustrate  on-3 aspect
of this need, a macroscopic material balance  is  giver, in Table 2.
This shows that, in 1971, Japan irr.ported  (rav;) materials of various
kinds including foods and oils with an arr.cunt cf 500  rr.illion  tons*
and exports of products totalled  to 45 r.illicn tons;  which, in
turn, means the difference of ca.  40C  rr.illion tons wers being
deposited in -various-forms,,of. nater.iaL.cr .wa_ste  in this_  country.
Waste Disposal and Public Cleansing Law

     When discussing resource recovery from municipal  waste,  one
has to refer to this'law as the  sole national  law  on the waste
handling in Japan.  The Law passed in the National Diet (Japanese
Parliament) in December, 1970 and was enacted  in September/  1971,
with the accompaning working rules of related  governmental agencies.
The waste, according to the Law/ is legally divided into two cate-
gories; the industrial and the general waste.   Further, responsibili-
ties for treatment of the former are assumed for the enterp~feneur-
in charge of the emission, while the latter is for the municipal
authority.  However, in practice, some amount  of industrial waste
is mingled with the normal general waste and is hauled by the
municipality.  Thus the term "municipal waste" or  simply "unburn
refuge", although it'is not defined in any form in the Law,  is
commonly used and understood as  the wasze which is actually hauled
and disposed of by the municipality.

     The Law, as its title partially indicates, is a revision of
the formerly known "Public Cleansing Lav;".-  Ivith this  revision,  an
irportaivt point is that the Law  now classifies the wastes and
assurr.es the responsibility for their disposal, although there is
                              \/
A ton in this reoort  is  in  theme trie  unit  cr  equivalent, to
1,000 Kgs  (ca.  2~,200  lbi=).     A

-------
CA2LZ 2   MA12RIAL TRADE BALANCE
(l^pori.)
10  tons
r C 0 ZS
Iron Ore
<~ _-_, ^ - -, 	 - "O-rt- -^
C~r.er Minerals
Crrade Oil
Ccal
Others
Total
0.2
. 1.2
0.2
0.4
2.5
0.5
0.2
5.0
 (Export)
  Q
10  tons
3-eel
vฃ— i-i is er
Csrsr.t
Foods
Textiles
Ships
Other Products
Total
0.24
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.05
0.45

-------
r.o specific instructions or incentives for resource recovery
involved with.  For the municipality, the Law authorizes exemption
from the direct disposal cf the industrial waste, which is generally
considered a new development in a leqal sense.
?rcm Disposal to Resource Recovery

     Traditional handling of municipal refuge, as indicated in the
Disposal Lav:, has never intended a higher level recycling until
very recently.  However, the need for resource recovery observed
for the last couple of years, arose first from the municipality
sector, then from consumers and now is positively supported by the
industry sector.  At a recent meeting of the National Federation of
Municipal Authorities for Public Cleansing (whose member municipali-
ties are counted 498) , a resolution for promoting technology develop-
ment of resource recovery was made formally.

     The reasons that the municipality first came for resource
recovery'appear to be as follows: Firstly, the municipality with
the traditional disposal cf incineration or landfilling became
simply not manageable with the increasing amount of complex-in-
composition refuse, by both financial and technological means.
Secondly, the citizen's awareness for resource recovery instead of
disposing the waste has been giving constant pressures to the
municipality.  These two reasons have together formed the following
trends.

   Consumer's and citizen's increasing desire for higher quality
   of the environment, has made the municipality aware of that
   any simple disposal method which is/^environmentally acceptable
   will no longer practical.        ^everf>

   The municipality has thus realized that any such processing

-------
                                                     -9-
costs a lot:  With incineration, the facilities for air pollution
control, water treatment and residues disposal satisfying ever
getting severer emission standards are costly.  Similarly, with
landfilling, costs for abatement of odor, soil pollution,
vibrations, noises",/ traffic jam of hauling vehicles and other
adverse effects are staggering.

Land purchasing for disposal or processing has become increasingly
difficult for the municipality because of neighborhood's opposition
and the increase of land price.

Public av;areness of scarcity of natural resources in this country
has increased recently, especially after the Arab Oil Embargo
last autumn.

Industries who have been concerned mainly with recycling of
                           VJTC^^y
industrial wastes alone, nowYnarnec their attention~ro~resฉtปr-ce
recovery from municipal refuse.

Government, throught various agencies, has started diversified
efforts for resource recovery, based on the national interest
for protection of resources depletion and from foreign countries'
threats on the diplomatic stage.

-------
                 CURRENT STATUS A::D TRZI-TPg

Japanese Municipal Waste for Resource Recovery

     As it is so in Europe and the United States, the composition
and other characteristics of the Japanese waste are subject to
greater change with seasons and locality.  It is important to
grasp those variations no natter what type cf recycling is intended.

     A typical example of a yearly averaged composition of the
Japanese municipal refuse is shown in Table 3. This is the average
composition of the waste collected in 'Tokyo Metropolitan area in
1972 with the averaged moisture content  (in percentage) for each
entry.  Compared with the composition of the American refuse, the
followings are noteworthy for the Japanese waste on the average sense,

   Overall moisture content is approximately twice as much higher.

   Plastic content is 2 to 3 times more.
                                                                   4*.
-  Food waste which is normally very much wet, occupies relatively
   higher content.

   Metals fraction is about half that cf the American refuse.

   Paper fraction is also relatively lower.

     Because of these relative features, the Japanese waste has,
on the average, a heating value cf 1,330 Kcal/kg; generally
ranging from 1,000 to 1,500 Kcal/kg.  Although the carclic value
tends to increase, this relatively lever heating value is considered
a disadvantage especially for energy recovery from the Japanese
                                                         *"          ซ
municipal waste.

-------

            -.T ••>".—•' ~T~-r^' i\:7) Ti'3  /'""Z'3 —5 yCT
             - r-::a"G XSIXOPGLITAI: AREA 1:1-1972
•
; — . 	 „ - -^ „ .: - . j__
1
-• ; Isz-ilss
_2 !
-2 j V.'icis, 3az:boo
1 j Rubbers, Leather
O !
" i '
j Garbage (Food V/aste)
i
| Other Crgaziics
3 j Petals
c c: j Glass, Ceramics
o cs ! '
ง ; C-:her Ir.cr^ar^cs
^*
V/ei^ht Percent
(V/et 3-se)
33.?
1 *
3.6

4.2 -
0.5
22.7
5.7
4.1
7.1
6.6

Av. Koisture
Content, reroent
5"1 .3
36.6
44-6

41.7
13.0
76.3
55-5
5.7
1.2
_

       ~in::v~z ANALYSIS AICD HZA':I::C- YALUS c? TH3  CCMBUSTIBLZ
f -.\ ' /'--\ ~ • /•'-•"
->-; | \-"-; ! U;
51.8* ; 2.= ;, !- 33-::
o--:--,-r.
(s)
0.1 %
AT.: -,„-. -.,, — .
u j. ^1 Ogcil
(:0
Heat iris?
Value"
:-:cai/KS
2.6 5i j 4,753
ฃc-jrce:   Il^-ii l-l^ibucsu (Solid Waste),  September,  197.3-

-------

     The combustible fraction which car. be the raw material fcr
thc- "back-end systeir." like pyrolysis has, however, a co-parable
chemical composition.  An ultimate analysis is illustrated ir.
Table 4. The heating value of this combustible for this example
was 4755 Kcal/kc  (dry base), which is, together with its chemical
composition, approximately equal to those cf rhe corbustible frac-
tions of European ana American refuge.  This suffices to say uhat
the large part of the combustibles is cellulosic no matter where
the refuse comes.

     In conclusion, the Japanese waste is handicapped in that the
pretreatment of separating the organics from inorganics requires
a more complicated, thus costly processing.

     Almost - all present consumer goods or products are considered
the potential input to the municipal was 3= processing.  Thus what-
ever type of resource recovery may be intended, the current statistics
on those materials and products are of relevant importance.  Further-
more, the data may become important for predicting the change in
the future refuse composition and the possibility of success for
the present source separation for facilitating the recycling.
At present, source separation practiced in the Tckyo Metropolitan
(Special District) areas, for example, requires the house^wife to
separate the waste into three categories; the normal waste, hard-
for-disposal waste such as plastics or non-combustibles and bulky-
matters.  The first two types of waste are picked up daily or every
other day, while the bulky wastes are hauled less frequently/-
usually or.ce every two weeks or so.

     In Table 3, six important materials or products were selected,
that might result in the potential effec-s en the municipal was~e
cor position.  They rivr- (1) automobiles, (2) pacer, (3) plastics,
(4. home c-lectric appliances, (5) metal cans and (6)  glass bcttles.

-------
     MAJOR V/AoIZ ?r:CL'"/JT3
                               •75  (3)  I  T?5 (3)
   5.6
           2,610
 10.32
3,000


10.51
                11.3B
                                3,630
           11.73
                           E:   Estimated
                               (Unit:  ICr  tons)
           ..„-,  f ^\ I   . -, ,  /-_\
           '7p  U; i    :-  t-J
15,613
15,60
U  I  _C

                       ,600
                      - -, ^ ^ .


                      2,CC,



                      59.^


                      'o 7-
                      -'/•'•-
17,030    13,000
                     7,200   j   7,600



                     5,330      5,300


                     2,230   j   2,300
                             !
                            E:  EstL-natad

-------
                                                     -o  -ซ_,,
                                                     j-J   jjiปS
^\,^ ,-, ,::u)r^) ,;
---•,------—-- --- ;-~-7 r^.^1 • u _--.,., 677
".";... -5 I- 1 -;.;-._:.- 3 l.'-.-S 1ฃฃ.2 2C<;.7 235
- ~ V "l -" ~ - - - -v% ."> - ~* ' ซ ^s C'Q 1 ", ~ Ci 1*C
	 ~~"" ^~^" ' i "~" x~'~ ~"'*' 1
3/A (;'} ! 2?. -5 31.32 j 33-36 34-
• i i
:/3 (-/-:, i 5:. 42 50.59 ; 30.50 50.
f
! 1
(,)

.1
.0
70
62
•:;. Ci>

131.4
35.35
50.75
V.'aste 2ic~9  ZlscTric; A'c'dlisjncss
                                             Estina
                                             (Unit:   10s" units)
             -72
                         '73  (2)
                                -974 (^
                            Frcduc-l

                               tion i
                                       209
.a;.




 f-
 \ —




 i-
-.er
135



 19



533  !
                               320
                                           153
                                             27
303



175


 33
                                                           155
                                       314   i   290     253
                                                2s:
                                                        ;>, .•>


                                                        125

-------
^"\. FY
^\^
Steel Can
(1C-5 tens)
'"*.._•„ __ ri -, -^
_(ij. •.-.n i n urn LSJI
(1C6 cans)
1972

35
160
'75 (I) '7- (Z)

17c • 26;;
61- ^ 1,6=1
'75 (I)

590
1,555
'76 (E)

^50
2,000

(6)  Glass Container
Uni":  tons)
^^-^^^ FY
^^-^^
Production A
V/aste Bottles
3
Hcusehold
Source C
3/A (?6)

C/2 (55)
1S72

1,345,970
555,191

551,515
50. oc

60.00
1 7 - '_-'
i S . — ,

If- — r1 ^ - -v
,5---,--^
--rr*. • — *•>
^ >J,--u

-i > -~ ' '
^ ^ 4 C' 1_

ฃ:.::
'"7- (-)

o "*. '-i.'* ^ r,r
ฃ, j '^f *-, •U y '*J W w
cGC 5 000

^c. ,OCป
50. cc

^", ^r>
C'^.'^'J
i~s r^1)
1 > V— /

7 TO r. "^
^1 ซ — UO j ^ ^ ->
650, ccc

> / O j ^ j -j
50. cc

< n ,— rs
-/ J , -->
'76 (I)

2,2oo,c:c
660, CCO

>xc ป ^ -'-'
50. cc

60. c:


-------
                                                      -16-

For the all products, except ::.etai car.s, yearly statistical figures
on both production and disposal are listed.

     The automobiles abandoned on the street, for example, call
now public attention, and who is actually responsibl-e—and who
should pay for taking care of is a central controversy among the
municipal authority, automobile manufacturers, and the residents.
Considering the fact that the municipal sanitation department  is
not capable of disposing or recycling of those cars, the future
of this problem is hardly predicable.

     For papers, the recycle ratio (recycled amount/production)
instead of waste paper amount is listed.  The figure of 38 percent
recycle ratio already observed in 1972, is almost two times the
corresponding American figure of 19 percent in 1967, which was
reported last year at the First Conference. tAs predicted in this
table, the ratio is expected to still increase at least nearly by
5 percent two years from now.  Further we are optimistic for this:
Recent technological development by the AIST, which shall be des-
cribed later, has made possible to recover reusable paper fraction
                                                                  ->*.
out of the mixed refuse mechanically in the most efficient and
effective manner.  When the equipment being installed in the near
future on an extensive scale, the paper recycle ratio is expected
to increase further more, perhaps reaching somewhat 55 percent or
more.

     As for the plastics, only the waste fraction is indicated.
Recent MITI's data show, however, ths-, in 1572, 163,CDC tens out
of 1,862,CCO tons of the waste plasrics (approximately 9 percent)
were recycled in one form or another.  Current estimate for the
plastic recycling based on the data gives 523^000 tons of 2,589,000
x-;aste tons in 1976, which corresponds to about 20 percent.

-------
                                                   -17-
Municipality's Trends for Resource P.s^vcry

     As stated before, no specific effort fcr resource recovery by
the municipality has been observed except the high-speed composting.

     Future trends, however, include many possibilities for the
Japanese municipality.  Most promising  one for earlier realization
is heat recovery by incineration.  This possibility rr.av be espe-
cially higher for large cities, where large scale-incineration is
actually in practice.  On a naticr.al basis, transfer frcr. land-
filling to incineration in refuge disposal has been enhanced by
the Ministry of Health and Welfare through its First  (Ji 1963 -
?Y 1967) and Second  (FY 1967 - FY 1971) rive-Year Plans for Incinera-
tion.  During the period, a large number of quality incineration
facilities had been constructed mainly in large cities, with grants-
in-aid from the Government.
                   •                              I
     As the result, by the end of 1971 in seven largest cities,
40.5  (wt) % of the total refuse went to the incinerator, and the
rest to landfilling, with a trace percentage for composting.
Figure 1 shows the percentage of incineration, in Tokyo, Yokohama,
Nagoya, Kyoto, Osaka, Kobe and Kita-Xyushu, which all together
collected the refuse of an amount of ^ million tons in 1971.
This amount of waste is approximately one quarter of the total
municipal refuse that was collected in Japan in the* year.

     With this enhancement of incineration fcr disposal, relatively
newer incinerators have some kind cf hsat recovery facilities.
Among them, waste heat boiler is r.csr ccr.vr.cn fcr providing hot
vater or low quality steam to the nearby u-ilities or public
buildings like nursing homes.  Some bcilers are capable to genera-e
electricity of fev; thousand kilowatts, which usually"is cnly for in-
olant r-cv;er use for .conserving the normal utilities.  Table 6
illustrates these examples practised or planned in the Tokyo and

-------
                                             FY iy,

Osaka
Koce
1,513

  -12


  ฃ3 7
                      5 3. 6
                     7 1.0
                                           Incineration

53.8
                                  57.8
                                   60
                                              _i	1_
                                                          SO

                 Sta-is-ics Assoc, (Ed.): "Gcmxjarable
                              r-a Cities - 5Y 1971  -".  (i?73)

-------
"? "<•? '? "ff
C1 ~* *^ *~
o' (-" O ฃ
h" B jr H^ O ~3 p' P- f"f b P /— O
too^ n p: p o p i- *; rf ^ s
cr c 2 p FOrrP^v-'Ot/' -r <~
H- v_x rr ง P H- 0 3" 0 1:0
<-t b H- B cr-C H- 0 f. S
S c 4 ง g ^
.? S- w p
O i
u f
P-- p
p
-C* .^ VJ) XiT1 O^t CN O ro PO C?
O V.1 OO CO COOO
O O OC OO OOOO
\J1 M ^> VI MM 3fsJ\jJ\jJ
-*ป. ro V-TO Cv^ O^OO
O O CO CO OOO
O O OO OO OOO
0 M M Wl
O 3 d -
31 10
rf- *Cf * ^cJ O
H ป-• I-1 O
II - - - 1 •ฃ
W *^ *^ P
(DO Op
i_j ^j c 5
O fl> O O
H 4 P-
ro •>— •
U1 —0
0 0
0 0
CO 53 *2 **j jฃ J2
< p C P p ฃ
H- B R O H -:
S to ts K- p. 2
3 H- 3 r S 3 H- (B 3
1 P. = S 09 C; I p, p. c* ft
P5 „ — ^ " —
T! o" c" cr 5"
C S H t- H
O it c K- • ".
H-1 O
5 4 HH OH ". 1 5 ^
ra o o o OH- ft o o f.
•• 3" nrnr Di-1 ~rr~s
CN VD VO Vi> * VO ^^ \O — ^ -
~r** C^* -i^1 ' — '' H*' — ^J 	 1 r-~*
' -t1- — >
y
(-3 O o f; M -— '
5 ?- P- ฃ rt-
(S ? e (S
ฃ - ^7 •'"
P t* S:
C\ ro O C\ -O
O O O O O
O O O O O
r>o ro M M ro
O O O O O
O O O O O
I— i
3
h-"
g
0""
c
?S g ? ?
HI ^ fT E
o >-• r
3 o r; t r:
•-: r; rc c
— c" c r =
2 3 n 4 -
o M 5- 3 ::"
<~*" ^— r^ T ™
O c^ ^ O "^
t
fj
S"
p
<-h
K-
Capacity
(Refuse tons/day)
o
O
o
H
P
<— -rt-
•5 ฐ
O
1
H-
Electricity Supply
(KW)
o"
c*-
f
2
'- :
c
5
V—
r-t.
'

-------
Suburban cities.

     Since Japan is located in the terr.perate  climate  region/
except Hokkaido, district haatir.g is r.z~ practiced  as  ir;  Europe
and/or in a part o.J
?his  in ~urn r.eans that the waste
heat recovery by incineration for district hearing  purpose  is  not
practical without any piping facilities.  For  the electrical power
generation, out-plant supply is, ir. principle,  quite possible,
although it is not performed because  cf non-technological reasons.
Current boilers are mostly cf waste heat type  and the  wsterwall
furnaces are not used extensively.  Ilajcr non-technological barrier
for electricity is that most electric utility  companies  are reluc-
tant for this idea, simply because of lew quality electricity  with
fluctuations both in time and quantity.  In.  addition,  most  coal
burning power plants had been long before modified  to  oil or gas-
fired furnaces, in Japan.

     In this respect, the only e:-rcepticr. is  the Nishiycdo Incineration
Plant of the Osaka City.  The plant has a processing capacity  of
400 tons of refuge per day, and is equipped  with two 2,700  KW
generators, with output voltage cf 6y6Cj V.  formal power output
is 1,600 KW each generator.  Of this  3,200 Ki~,, 700  K?7  is consumed
for in-plant use, the remainder 2,500 l-7.\ is  for selling.  Kansai
Electric is purchasing this electricity with ar. average  price  of
2.46 yens per kilowatt-hour or ca. 3.2 mils/KTvrl  (Incidentally,
current end-use average price of electricity in Japan  is somewhere
around 7 yens/KWH, or 23 mils/KWE.}
     in Tokyo, Katsushika Ir.cinerati
ccr.structicr. and shall he cperatei. f
electricity of 12,000 KW, with a refuge
Of this, 5,000 K:.T is agreed with ickyc
This trend for energy recovery by sell;
to be fo.s~ered in the future with the i
paiitv sector.
         rlar.r "hich  is  ncv; under
        ~  arr.cunz of  1,20C  tens/day.
        Electric to he  bc'j.cr^t.
        r.r  elec~rici~y  is expecte
        r.itiative taken bv the  r.iu:-

-------
     ror "Che past lev; years,  ccr.ruri~y  (civic)  groups in co-
operation with city's sanitation authority have besn ir.C-ris.sir.cly
encaged ir. active recycling rr.over:.ฃrt, ir.  rr.any cities.  Of these,
the best known one is the  recycling  in  Tcshirra Special Ware of
Tokyo, which often is referred  to as  !:rr.e Tcshima Project".
The principal idea for  this Project  as  as foliov;s:  Block ccmr.urity
societies, which have long been in exiszence traditionally in Jc"ar.
known as "cho-kais", or communal organs,  take the initiative of ~ha
Project.  A participating  cho-kai asks  its rr.3r.ber farr.ilies to brar.g
whatever recyclable things to a nearby  specified lot on a specific
data by a certain tine.  And  the chc-kaa  previously had asked via
its Ward's Sanitation Office  to send  truck (s)  of recycling firm's)
to the lot to pick the  materials up.  The Ward Sanitation Office
which belongs to the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, normally gives
the permit'- for this activity,  arranges the hauling schedule fcr
the secondly material dealers and refunds the profit to the cho-
kai .

     Recently a variation  of  this scheme  is seen:  Instead of zhe
dealer's truck pick-up, the Ward's sanitaticn collection trucks
haul all materials gathered and transport to the dealer's plar.u.
This variation has an advantage that the  lot is kept always clean
without any left-over,  which  is often seen in the Toshima Project.

     The results by this recycling activities are summarized in
Table 7.
Trencs  Observed  in  (Central)  Govern.-:.--nt' s Efforts

     Various  efforts  of the Cenrral Gcvernrr.ent through itฃ Aganr:aฃฃ
and Ministries,  have  been placed for resource recovery.  ---rr.or.r -hc=e
the Ministry  of  International Trade and Industry  (MIT!), T.."hich

-------



o
c
c"
1 — '
o
5
o
S3
3
O
nclude ih
rc
o-
o
4
o
0
•r->
tD
CO
*




1 t-1
•3
CO
••
V*
V."
CD
M
CO
CN
INJ
CO
co
X0
vo
-p-
vx
CO
CO
Vw
CO
ON.
ON
0
ro
q
VJ1
1 C7N
V-N
t->
VO
t

•o
ro
^j
H1
ro
tV>
t— '
HJ
-o
o
vo
co
CO
ro
. CN
V7I
VO
CO
O
CO
ฃ

c
CO
t— '
v.-.'
vo
I-1
vo
o
o
ro
O
VV
ON
VJJ
CN
1— i
O
t-1
VM
O
CN
VJJ
\J\
VJn
CO
0
VJ1
GO
It
q
T\5
•*
q
ro
\O
CO
VJ.'
VD

5
I
V
<<•
( — 1
1
vr
CN
c
V,"
v,-
V.T
O
•ง
CN
CN
VJJ
ro
VJT
v;
c. -
vc
v_r
0

-
C.
o
c
c
o
c
p-
1
^ o
rs
^ -
_^ -3.
a
c
>j>
^ i— <
O P
••> OS
CO
Others
(K/,0
Bottles
?z o
c
r*^ 3
P5 r-
^ 	 _
<
1 <-•



5"
o
o
b
rt-
1— <
a



f
c
2. -1*

t
i



1-3
—3
>
s
Ei
S3
K
-<
?->
c:
o
g
2
l-=
l-i
tz
s
c
c
f— -t
fn
1
6




-------
has been playing a supervisory rcle for all production  industry,
have been riainly concerned with recovery and reuse of industrial
wastes to increase production efficiency.

     However, for the municipal refuse, little attention had  been
paid for resource recovery till two to three years ago, except
that soir.e investigations on the szate-cf-the-art were performed.
The Agency of Science & Technology, an independent governmental
agency, through its Resources Investigation Office, v:as the
earliest to perform this kind of surveys and studies en both  the
general waste and industrial waste since 1965 or 1967.

     The Agency of Industrial Science & Technology  (AIST)  of  the
MITI, as shall be described later, planned a R & D Project for
Resource Recovery from the municipal waste back in 1971 and one
year study program budget was appropriated for the FY 1972.
The R & D for resource recovery technology and system formally
started from FY 1973, as one of the -Taticnai Projects conducted ar
the AIST.

     The Ministry of Health and Welfare, which is traditionally
concerned with solid wastes from disposal viewpoint, has not  been
much involved with resource recovery ur.til very recently.

     It is generally well known that an- inter-institutional projecl
for utility-oriented resource recovery on a gigantic raft  afloat c:
held in the coastal ocean is in its planning stage.  The prograr.
had been studied by the Research Institute for Ocean Economics.
a non-profit organization, for t-.-;o years and the prograr. concept
V.-5.E employed as a governmental project since the beginning of ~:f
1974.  (April 1, 1974).  An amount, of approximately 5C million yens
(ca. .170,000 US dollars) was appropriated for this study.  Ar.i the
participating agencies include the Environment Agency,  the MITI
through ius Office of Ocean Development, Z-Cinistry of Health &
Welfare and the .Ministry of Transportation.  The feasibility  of

-------
of this ir.arine utility plant is considered very high, because
this type of resource recovery plant is normally for large cities
and most large cities in Japan are located en the ccastai region.
If, for example, such ir.arine plant is planned in the Tokyo Bay,
the plant could serve not only Tokyo Metropolis but also its
surrounding suburbs in an organized manner.

     At present, the plant facilities shall include ,mostlv; tech-
nologies and processesydeveloped by rhe AIST, and the transportatic:
of refuge from the coast to the floating plant shall be conducted b]
the pipeline.  The plant is planned to have a pyrolysis process,
desalination process and possibly materials recovery section.

     Current central Government's efforts for resource recovery
from the municipal waste, described above briefly, involve a wide
variety of agencies.  There is a.trend observed, however, that
those scattered efforts will be incorporated to enhance its
efficiency.  This means an intensi\7e inter-institutional cc-
operation which is normally hindered by the "unseen" barriers.
Nevertheless, it is predicted that the Environment Agency,  created
back in 1971, shall play an important role as the leading agency in
this organization of the efforts.
Trends in Industry                     "

     Industry as a private firm or group has been traditionally
concerned with recycling of only industrial wastes.  This is
known as the in-plant recycling.  In this respect, pyrolytic
liquefaction of by-products cr was re plastics at rhe polyrer
manufacturing plant, for example, has been ccr.s for the resource
conservation purpose.  The Government  (MITI) has taken an incenti
policy, encouraging the industry to this kind of plant by means o
grants-in-aid, lev; interest loans, special amortization plan cf r

-------
facilities, and tax exempts.

     The in-plant recycling (known in Japan often as "clcsecization"
of zhe plant) has been increasingly enhanced recently because of
the decreasing number of contractors who take care of plants wastes
for disposal or reuse and its increase in disposal cost as the
environmental restrictions are getting severer.

     Industry, in its large part, has shown no interes_t__in resource
recovery from the municipal refuse, with the exception of plant manu—
facturers.  However, as the municipality, faced with increasing
amount of industrial wastes mingled with the normal waste (it is
termed as the "hard-to-dispose waste" by the municipality)T started
denouncing the industrial circles that they should somehow assume the
responsibility for this, the industry producing these materials cr
products responded with showing some actions.  For example, manu-
facturers of home electric appliances, automobiles, plastic products,
and packaging materials, have shewn recycling plans or programs
that prevent those materials from coming into the municipal waste
stream and give some technological solutions.

     Normal industry's approach to this problem exemplified by
first establishing functional organization with concerned firms and
performing various activities ranging from establishing the data base
to operating some demonstration plants, which are usually supported
or. funded in part by the Government.  The Plastic Waste Management
Institute, for example, was established back in 1972 by 34 polymer
manufacturing companies.  The HIT1 has been cooperative with the
Institute since its formation, providing various assistances inclu-
ding subsidies, information and authorization cr. ccr.ductz.r.g rescurcs
recovery projects.  The Institute is also instrumental ir. providing
government's grants-in-aid  for plastic reutiiization programs cf
individual efforts.  It has two recycling pi anus runnir.gr one in
Fur.abc.s.hi City ar.d another  in Koshigaya City, in both cf which the
source separation of elastic materials or -crccucrs are practiced

-------
     Another example of industry - Governm.-r.i jcir.t project was
the establishment of the Ivaste Pa-er ?.ecycling Promotion Center.
The Center v:as erected in June, 1374.  Izs primary concern is
the storage of waste paper for providing stable supply and thus
for higher repayment of recycled pacer.

     Furthermore, in July, 1974, the Japan Electrical Manufacturers
Association which is representative zz essentially ail manufacturers
of electrical appliances, established with a governmental assistance,
the Recycling Association from Used Zlectric Appliances.  The latter
Association is setting many plans to recover resources from municipal
bulky wastes, whose large fraction is used electric appliances.
The automotive industry and container manufacturing industry show
interest in establishing the similar organisations that will be
involved with recycling.

     Responded to those movements in various industrial circles,
the Bureau of Industrial Location and Environmental Protection,
MITI, planned an incentive legislation for resource recovery early
this summer.  However, the legislation was not succeeded because of
disagreement on practical details among various industrial sectors,
and was temporarily postponed.  Instead, the Bureau is planning
establishing an organization called, the Clear. Japan Center in the
~Y 1975.  The Center is intended tc ccuple the resource recovery
effort with the "Keep Japan Seauuiful" rover in- fiitsr^d cumntiy

e:.~icted to merge vith other cenuars cr ir,s~i~ut_cr.s "co ^rc = r.i^i
municipality by exchanging informaticn and holding seminars cr
mating for training the municipal employees for resource reccv.
Thฃ.- Center in FY IS 75 as one of the- r?;curce recover-- efforts,
shc.il have two model olants at select=-f citiss, v;here
                                                       	C U.U....'.

-------
                                                        -27-
straticn of r.aterials recovery fro::. z~.a bul!-:y wastes is  ^0 be
conducted.

     Tne Japan Resources Technical Instiru.e with its ~3~ber
cor.panies of r.ore than 100, v/as established bach in 196S  from
the permission of the Agency of Scier.c-a and Technology and has
been playing a pioneering role in the resource recovery  field of
both industrial and municipal wastes in Japan.  The Institute
is the oldest of this kind and represented by various industries.
Recently, as of September 9, 1974, -he Institute and the  National
Center for Resource Recovery signed an agreement on the  joint
cooperative program of exchanging inforr^rion on resource recovery
in both Japan and the United States.

-------
                ,   ._•. -'_^. - <,. o-w
             ;•. "_• ~ri ze:


                                              rescurece  rc-ccvary
                                              r.ll into  (1)  Lxrracr

                                              r. cf  uhe  1"C".R.
                                              inclusive,  is the
     5cr each  subdivision nuriered ir. -/.s -able, r^ny  unit cperaticr.s
.;_: _rc,c-3Sฃi;S  are ccr^siclered.  Under '1*  the Extraction MRS, two
r./._-ep cf processes are identified.   The first type  is  the process
ir. which products or parts  such  as bottles, cans or live motor of
•z'-.a refrigerator are reclaimed and the recovered products can
easily be  fed  back to the nearest production line without nuch
processing.   Difficulty for this  prccess is to identify the material
-o b& reclaimed out cf the  mixed  waste strean and select it effectively.
HaV.d picking  is the typical seans for recovery.
     The Secor.J. type process  for  the ^:<:tracticn MRS  includes the
r? .-lc.-r.-ior.  of such rev r.ateriais as glass cuiist, pulp fibre,
--!-:-: r.ur. ::c-.J"or and so forth.   The ba.ฃir idea is ro  extract ~he
             :'jiSts o~^ c'"ji3""i"'r'cr  a*"d  sor*^l~~c' ^"rsraTLic^s.   Si^ce the
              rec—ai.rr:ec iT.c.'cenaiS detsnc.? _arce_y on  ~c.as purify
 r .-.'..-"r..ra';!en efficiency, the  processing is usually  cone in uhe
7"— 't 1 — s~i.cs  ฃ."d''cr ~"—lti~oass  fashion.

-------
                                 :ic"cion  Material R
                                 ;arat ion/re fining)
                     '—(2)   '. :r.vsrsicr.  Material Reoovsry
                              (or.esical,  biological, etc.)
                                             3SS
Sr.ergy Recovery
(-herzal, electri-
 cal, etc.)
                      I— (3)   Storaole/Transportable Energy-
                              Recovery
                              (pyrolysis,  hydrogenatin, etc.)
(4)  lirect Energy Recovery
     (incineration po-./er generation,
      e'cc.)
                                             BES
                                                                     BES

-------
     Ur.der  the  (2)  category, or Conversion ::r..S, ccr:pc?zlr.r ,
c:. treble rrethar.ation ,  single-cell  prczsir. "yi-.-ir.3Sis,  alcohol
s'-"~.~.~. es i. s and  catalytic hydrccG.rvrti.cr.. zc  :;crm i~. __ 3, uzilmmg
crt-.-.r.ic fraction of the waste and  calci.'.azi on zc form building
                                                 reus,  are
exemplified.

     The  first zype cf the energy  recovery/ term:;- hire as  the
 (3; Storable  and Transportable Ir.erry •; Source-} ?::• cover/ Sysren
 (Z?vS), includes pyroly-ic conversion  przce^se? zo fuel  gaoes
and oils,  and sorr.etirpes to chars.   I- ray be pointed cut rhat the
crc* cesses  classif— ed in no  (2) ar^'d  ' ~  c'~are t""-~ "-a7"^ 'p^o'^ess
principle  like pyrolysis, although the  products frc~; -he (2)  are
considered as raw materials, vrhiie zhe  ones frcr. the  [2]  as energy
sources.   This means zhat the process operazing conditions  usually
differ.  The  products from the  (2)  &  (3)  are, in nest instances,
subject to refining crocess for  cor~~5.ra.blr? rvaliz"." "-rith zhe corres-
pc.-ding virgin materials.

     Electric power generation is  typical example of the (4)  Direct
ET-.S.  The  process systems in the  (4)  cazagcry are rair.lv concerned
v;ith the matching of energy supply/demand relationship  both in
quantity and  timing.  Most modern  incinerators vrith pcver cenerazing
facilities are known to have an  une::peczed lo~-er zherr.r.l efficiency
simply because of "steaming off",  most  of the zime .

     Two major difficulties are  identified in the resource  recovery
                               one  is                      "
                                                    ----•'' ~"-.-,  '	
r^ - - - T-' t a _~  i*~-iz- cr t ar* ce \ ~" en f o -~r' u _ az i n'  a  r-~ s o v ~ - c ^ r -• co''  —  "-"T ~' ~ ~ "
\,_zh kno"n  components satisfyinc a  s^z  zz  specific rc-:i~nal  cc".n_i-
ticns.  Ine second difficulty is r.orr:.a_ly  ;:suni in d-islgnir.;  -
re-cvrco  recovery  process nez-.-c;:k thaz  is  f r.:'. ^zicna 1 :-.:-. d  flexnl^
&r._.-.'i ~o acoopt all possible variations  .in
r?,zcriai  and energy fiws as bell :.

-------
   Input refuse  flow is constantly  obtainable ;_n rho ^v.-c.fy-sz;-7.c;
   rr.unr.3r.
   Input variations expected both in  ccrrrositicr. and quantity cc.r.
   .'.-o easily  absorbed.
   Output energy and materials including net crly the products
   but also all  by-products must satisfy the local  (environ: er.tal;
   emission standards.
   Recovered  output resources of energy and ma-erz-als must  be in
   some form  to  maximize the marketability with cor.paracively higher
   production efficiency.
Problems  Identified in Resource  Recovery R & D

     No matter how high level and  efficiency resource recovery
system is  intended, fundamental  principles observed in  the  conve
tional soild  wasce management and  the environmental acceptabilit
 r-                     V'
 O— — — ฃ^ O\7Ct~O 7~> "y*O*C'T~'^^'~'~T-f">O C^^'TC'F"'^'"'    r^"'^C-'n r* f- -• ^ —-^1 ^r^^>*^>'—ii*-*
 ~ i— at ov^jut^i.. i.iubLL — ~^3 LJJo iacii—Loij-^Cv-   j-.idi w^...— ^ w-.rr —^\_y'-*^--_^_-
        "*              /l\
principle.  Table 9 sujrjr:arizes the scild waste processing princi
observed  under the Japanese circumstances.

     In view  of those general process 'principles/ the ^fcllowin-g
problems  have been identified in the  course of R & D, purposed f
the Japanese  environment:

     The  first problem is concerned with the hazardous  materials
coning into the normal municipal waste.   PCE and its related  chu.
explosives,mercury vapor, several  hea"y  -.etais , are e;:r:rplss  of
thc^e hazardous raterials.  The  inclusicn of rh^7e r-: ~'-'::. -- Is  occ",
bcoause of uncareful and/or i.j.lc-c.1  d^r-ing, r: /: fr; -_'-':.:':1.'  .'--•-
district  *,;here the residential and ir.ius~rial ^c-ctcrs ^::--  .~.i.-gl_
Tho trouble is that the material is  hazardous onou~h fcr  r.::r.-:\l
handlinq  of the v.'aste and too little  in  cuanzi~" re be  r--co'-i-r^'l.

-------
                                                  ~*     W U  J ~ - j
.ir.viror-zer.~al
            ty
--i^r.er Zocr.cnics

or^ar.is.Tis durir.^; ^r.e co'^rse froir. gsnera—
tion to uli;i".a~3 iispcsal.

Minir^-un secondary pollutions of  the
processing  facilit".

Lesser i~pact3  on the existing socio-
ecor.omicai  ar.d  environaental systems.

Lov/er na~ processing cost vith revenues
~he recycled  products.

Higher marketability of the recycled
products .

-------
                probie-rr. is bas^d en -^':.c c;r.^.:^  charac^__'istics
of -che J&panese refuse; higher v.'-ic-ar  ar.c.  fcr;d vaste consent.
In addition  ro those charac-ceri^-;.::^ 7 the  - r-rrzerate ciir:--te has
r.ade it difficult  to design a sys^er wh-icr.  has a reasc:-.i.ble prcccs:
efficiency and is  satisfactory fcr -he hyrienic  ccnditior.s.

     The  third problem may be sor.ahcr-" reirced to the first.
In ir.any municipalities of this couritry, bu_/.y v;astes and the hard-
to-process refuse  whose content rr.ay vary frc^L or.e municipality to
another,  are collected separately ar.d v.vlrh  different frequency ar
the source.   And no suitable technology fcr those types cf v,vaste
is available for disposal and/or resource  recovery processing.
For exarr.ple, a source separation cf clastic-rich produc~s and the
non-ccrjoustibles in one container is conducted currently in the
Tokyo Metropolitan Areas, because of the adverse effects on the
incineration facilities.  No workable zechr.clcgy airr.ed at disposal
or resource  recovery to pick up ?T."C r.aterials selectively out cf
this mixture has .-e-^- vet been develo-ed.

-------
     az may ,oe saiG ~nar,
racman recycling", no general concensus on  tha  methciclc^y for tha
implementation of resource recovery systems  /.as yet  be^r. observer
in this country, although increasing a-.rarer.ess  fcr resource recovery
is confirmed.  This means that the non-technological factors,  i.e.
societal, economical and institutional factors,  are  yet  ^c become
mature before the resource recovery is ~o be impleir.er.ted effectively
_L ij. ซj ci ^j to. i ' _
     The real probler. appears to be the  lack  cf  prefer  information
on resource recovery:  Dissemination of  technical  ir.f creation and
administrative policies, training ar.c ecucaticn  have been  generally
conducted not in a satisfactory nanner.  An expert technologist in
this field and a friend of one of the authors, for sr-rarvple,  onca
told that a maor of a town with p
                                             cf  abcut  5C,jOO  car.i
to hini to say,  "My citizens are all  fcr  resource  recovery.
I consider the  power generation is most  premising.   Introduce me
the professionals, please".  However, no one  could  blar.e  the  mayor.
     Similar examples based on the ignorance r.ay be  cited  cf  the
consumer.  Consumers, who are well aware of ~he need for resource
recovery and often very anxious for iz, buy rhe products that are
not favorable for recycling simply because cf  zhe  lacking  .of  the
     r education.
     Recovered resources compared v:ir;
ger.jrally lover graded in  the quality,
oarclv because the rav material of re;

-------
                                                          -35-
r.iir.icipal refuse, is far poorer ma--rial, ar.d because  of  -ha
economical disadvantage in refining cr upgrading in order to  compete
with the virgin materials.

     For some instances, the disadvantage of this kind may become
no problem at all:  Recycled pulp per se, for instance, is usually
lov/er in grade compared with the virgin pulp.  It has,  nevertheless,
its own proper usage and, in addition, can be mixed with  virgin
pulp for any fraction.

     Kowever, recovered plastic pellets, for example,  are usually
lower graded because of contamination of pigments and  plasticizers,
and thus have a narrower range of re-application.  In  this connection,
it is hoped that another different system of industrial material
standards for the recycled be established along with the  existing
standards.  The latter, known in Japan as the JIS  (Japan  Industrial
Standards), appears to be better-suited for the virgin material and
its products.   (Incidentally, the JIฃ has been handled traditionally
at the AIST, to which both authors belong.)

     Current Government's incentives are concerned primarily  with
the development of technological processes for resource recovery
or disposal, and not for the recovered (secondary) materials.
One of the reasons is that the recycled materials are  yen to  be
orcduced on any large scale whose economical assessment is possible.

     Recent awareness among the Governmental communities  that the
market opportunities, as far as -ha seccr.cs.ry raterial is manu-
fcCiurDd on a s: allsr seals in a scattered rar.r.-r, rill ;:o very
lcv.Tsr ana the price will be unstable, has mad3 possible ~co employ
a central storaga policy for certair. ma-eriais like pap^i'-stock.
The action taken by the Governmer.-  (-he MITI) , in this ccnnecticn;
was the foundation and  funding of "-'aste ?aper 7c cycling  Promotion Cer.'

-------
   >june ,  19 /-^,  ''."."lie™, v.'as r~.cn~c.icr.Gc  c-_*r_i. ?r r ". ur.'-S 	~^~c. .
          c.LC'cecx thac., e.n tr.c. nec.r euiu_"ฃ ,  :?e.r.-.iar rc.c.	'_"_"•ฃ
or centers  for  plastics, ferrous e.r.d  r.:.::- -Ic._v: . .-; :: ecals ,   ill
es-a-blisr.ed with the Government incer.rL .-rs.

     The  MITI is, at present, ccnsidarir.r  sor;- forr;; of  s^ibsicy
fcr filling the price cap barweer. -/.2 v^rrir. 5.r.d S6cc:~iฃ.ry
materials, in irs plan  (at rhe iursau cf  Ir.zu = zrial Lccation
and Environmental Protection).  I\~evert'--.= les5, rhis and  the  sirr.i
plan like depletion allowances, have  net: yez bsen materialize::..

     Other economic incentives tc char.re  th=  Ccnsur.ers' Lahavicrs
to favor  the  recycled materials or  products  ars  also discussed at
different administrative levels.  Cne "ay  cf dcin:, this is  to give
an economic disincentive to tax those materials  or produces that
have special  difficulty in recycling.   But again this has not yet
dene in anv wav.
Social factors

     There  are many social factors involved that hinder the vsy
tc effective  resource recovery.  r~  h?.ve  to admit, in our efforts
of this aspect of problems, that v:e  are behind the United States.
The reason  for this is mainly because  cf  the greater serial inerti;
for the existing system in this ccunzry.   Anc~her is du; re zhe
fact that the Japanese have a special  ;"ychclegical reluctance ~c


ccrstant education ci" er.iaghcerire-r.u.

     From the municipality's side, zhe  lee;; cf erplcyeec '  cducrtic-
and trair.ir.g  fcr resource recovery im~lerrer-taeion is id^r.-cified  tc
be the major  problem.

-------
     Another  is  the institutional  x^'^.;_er...   7hi^ i:.cl_J..:;  :'.it c:.l .
local governments but also the Central  Gcverr.rr.er.u, and  _s  considu.. :.:
r.';oi"? serious  tr.an gencraj-ly ^..icuc^n i. L   ^ricr!L~'>' se'C-tim'j  anc. cor.sir,"—--
policy planning  among the public seczrr is  na-urally cf  x'itai iirp:r-
rance for effective and efficient  realization cf resource  recovery.

     Finally,  legislative reorganization cf both existing  and
future lav:s /  acts, codes or ordinances  for  resource recovery rroisz
be cited here  with a special err.phasis.   Current s-atus  of  this
aspect of resource recovery effort i/. Japan can be said hard to bea:

-------
II.  IMIi AIST'S R S: D  PROJECT-  CA' R

     Tr.e project was initiated  to  provide  a technological solution
    ;he municipal solid waste  problem vhirh  has various cociai,
economical and technological  impacts.   The  primary aim v:as ~o
recover resources from the  refuse.   Current vCasre Disposal and
Public-Cleansing Law states,  in the  Section 3 of Article 4, that
the Government shall promote  the development of rro oiosir.g technology
and provide technical as well as financial  aids -co t.-.~ local
autonomous public agency.   Uith this legal  justification.  the
Agency of Industrial Science  &  Technology,  X1TI, in -he FY li-72,
conducted a year-long state-of-zhe arz survey on the resource
recovery from the minicipal refuse and studied the possibility
to start a national R & D project  on the subject from the FY 1973.
The project entitled "R & D on  Resource Recovery and Reuse Techno-
logical System", was then formally launched as the Phase I that
will last for three years.   (Initial budget appropriation plan was
1.6 billicn yens or ca. 5.3 million  U.S. dollars, for this period.}

     Unlike the conventional  production technology R & D projects,
the emphasis was placed on  the  technology  "system", not on any
specific technology alone.

     Resource recovery, needless zo  ฃ5.y, can only bo
vrhen it satisfies the environment!  requirements •  --"-


lliniszry of Health ฃ.- "eifare  v,rho r.ad been  -r=_dio:.cr.-;,_]
of solid • t.~'zz ::ir.ฃc-er ant.
         aims of the project  may  he  S'irr.o.riodc;  az  follows:

     To recvcle the values  at the c-:~imil  oo:'.__ :ior..;

-------
















1





















































A

^ ป"••
o o
ซ< 
0 0
*-0 M)
"?
o. M
c o
C1 P

H- 3*
PR.
j?!?
t— <
o o
3 t-*
0 O
o -a
B-,?
a
>3 rt
(t
O f
rs
O  CO ~ K f&
H  < rt rt-*o c H-
(t) V- O p r*- P
CT rx o x h-1 ;; o a*
& ฃ !*> O f~*
f^ Jfo w"^ H-* 3 *"*
r- o *•< i o
i •-> M D-
cป-
ft
3
X1 A f~ '
t?p"
W 0 *3 H- B B
10 H- P' 0 11
rt- rt P H- 3
ic 3- r-t we to
B It P P
O C) >-• p
i-3O ป-• H- rt-
O to C1 rt
rt- r- ซ<

t— ' 3 O
3













•O H- rt- >
tl 3 0 M
K".O CO
< O O "3
P 4 <
rt "O P P
;t o K-* o
ti e rt-
it P P PI
3 rt rt-
rt I'- H- fJ
!t- 3 O ซ
4 P, 3
to rt
h rt 0 3-
H- 3- >•ป <ป
Cl It
It rt 3
03 to " C
0 It 0

O A* fl>
3 ป C
rt g o
H. O
(1 H- -

O P p.
H) 3 ffl
rt- 01
- H.
<ง























*
rf ?
K ฐ
I)
O
W
ฃ









ftf ?/
01 r3

ฃ'^
H* rt-

rt- O
*<
O
H.
O
p



-A.
-^ 	 >
t! ' ^
hj P
5) rrj H-
0 O 5
rt- (y H '
t-*- w *<
0 + H-
O C" C/l
H- "•<
O t-1 W
*-*) H- rt-

CO << 3

a1


V->-
0
3








|
o
+ -5"
P
H-
rt-
f 	

t) cn
S *"*"
S o


H^ c:
P *o
f+ M

O



























CO *-*
*<; tt
03
H- O
O ป-^
t~*
P
CD
p.






^ /

5
?3

i
o

j_i
<
/
H-

O
rt-
1

il
^ /
•
-?
o

< I-1

1
W

t-J

^


^* o
o o
rt- 3
t'. O-
P H-
M rt-
O O
•o c
10 to
H
P >-l
1 0

••
O 0
rtl
5* O
e t-j
P
c+
ป-•
o
tl
* — s

tป g:
O rt-


Z2
3 23

>-i
O
h


O O
fi1?
4 1-1
H. J-
O rt
O
ป: 3
rt p
3" >1
o .+
i.: (t

ro ft-
o ir
o it
3
งP*
0
>••• il
o o
H'jl
O_ P
X* p


to
rt


* *
co ft- in >-3
r* C T>
P > >1 0
rt- 0" < Z'
O l-i O 3
O ซ< O
0 K *"*
i-^ p, *~* o
v-' wa*<
rtป O t—
3- 30
(3 ra p
M M


rf- O



. ,^

$ y
rt- 5

2C P
P
rt-




• •
o w s* -3
O to o c;
" ฃ3 c* H
rt- H- ฃ rt-
M- | p ป-•
3 ^<<

i •*
-\
• •
o >
O 0
3 rt
rt C
K". p
3 t-J

ง ?
0] Cl
rt
It


/ 	 ^
Rฐ SI tl K
O -• O "•
•0 t-> 3 3
o H- :i o
4 O *H- O
rt P H >1
"• rt p H-
3 H- rt 3
(7) O 1—(M
3 O
O - 3 B
1-1 ~* ^
rt O* >-3 t--
H- H* W
co 3 r -
< B 3 O
>1- - C*l O

p t-i ai
t-1 3 W rt-

0 P p c
It O t-1 O
3 rt- C rt
o to P *••
rt O
"3 > H- 3
I-1 M O ป
P to 3
30- O
rt- 01 *3
CO K It
It P
3 rt
O
3
*•




•-I 3 rt >-l
It 0 !T 3
a rt It
rt- O
C PI
tl rt CT P"
O3-OO
to it < 1
(t
O 01 ป-i
"•:•< S 0
W O 4
rt rt- If

!ป B u 3-
it
I-1 P O
O t-i *-, 10
O 0! '<
p. O P a
t-1 rt
rr 3 1C
U 15 t! U
0^-3
O 3 K- rt
t-^Pi n o
(rt- O t} rr
-ซ 3 ^j
t'J K- rt
*• T rt- 3
o i. v d
MO >J

P h- C H-
O O t-*(7}
H- t-1*
O O
D a





!ฐ

ป-3 P3
o a
c*- <*
P P
i-^ cr
CO t-*'

C/I P*
fD 1)
cf
fs,

rt O
t 0
P 3
H O
It It
•o
o
• 1
o
3
rt











JO

01 01 rt- O O
ซ< o f 3 O
01 0 It 3
O It to 3- 3
3 rt- O it M
Vi O rt
O . H- >-3 tl
O O It P
3 1 0 rt
{/I s-^tt 3" H-
H t-i 0 3 O
E 3 O O 3
O 3 >-•
งrt O O O
3* 3 C^ t-^
 O 9> 01 3
O t-f H.
P p H PJ O
p" H^ (P (P (P
ป 3 5' S"
to jy nh t^
P 0
r' "•




M
•

O 3 CO ^
O. C "< It
O H- to p
H, 01 rt r-1
- p it K-
5 a N
rt 0 p
H It p. rt
p M It H-
ti ซ; o
"!•— .0 3
f— P M-
O t~ P. O

- 0
"1 p
p rt n
rt n t?
,-n it n
h o
- M e
3 >1
W PL- O
O It
•* E
t-1 ri ro
- <•; a
o



H.??
o o o
3 (-. -d
O W
O tl
rt V
rf
t-l H-
3 O
t— 3
rt
H- *••)
p O





• P
H
H1 It" rt-

S to
3 0-
rt H-
M
1-3 H-
It rt
0 >< .
3-
3 CO
0 rt
t- C
o o-


o o


CO *3
ซ< It
rt 3-
CD 13
W O
*7j M

JU hrt
O (D

O* M
H- H-
ป-• d*
K* H-
c+ t-ป
V H-
rt-


^ tf
03

p O rt
O 01
3 rt
rtS
4 O
P rt-
rt H-
H- O
O 3
3
t-* O
P -0
5 o
rt- 1
to p
rt
O
3
O
M)

5
S









3s
C ^-^
S" co >
it <~: to
p. to
0 r- C
o s 3
M) >*
rt h-i
P O rt
IP
? S3
5 o P
K- ' vt-

V i <
p p It
>-• r)
t-" rt O
rt t- t-j
<< 0
ซ H. o
3 O
1?) FJ
^ XI

i'sf
r— r>
o r
^
1
1
CO
rt-
ฃ
o






-(
/





1

o
o_

3
O
H*
O
K


< 5
n> n
i-i
o ^
1
O
3
rf
CO
rt-
P

(D
1








<(
^



I
CO
W
rt-
O
B

ป
B *
o :
3 1
ซ t
rt f
H
P >
rt t
H-
O
3
CO
rt
fป
S
It
t










CT

M
rt
It
S
M
B
•o
M
U
3
rt
P
rt
H-
O
Cl
rt
P
tf-1
it


j, ^ ir,
r* '^
r" B d "-•• Vw fO M
•j) 3 P30 ...
W O O W "• WปO
P t-i H-OO (9OO
tl W ? rt 0. 3
P S3 P O ซ> rt c t:
rt t-i rt tOO
O Rซ ^3" 1 rt ซ
1 rt It t--- <
X M ^ tl M O P
r ff 3 rl-
•TJ H- < t—
Hi 3 H- H- o
' O O. M 3 3
TJ C O
4 to 3 ^t O
งrt B t i->
4 it rt-
01 ฃ' 2. ซ 5
•• p rt T3 3
i-| P K it
I-1 O ti
ta o c*>
>* t^ o  o
J 3*
3 ^ 	 j
O •
H • ป-t
f 1
ff_^ w

e^i B O
3 " *
"> rt to
3- P
(D t—'

"-1 w o
.0 t^J

0 It P
S 3
•i S ป
P 3
y ^ rt
r ง *
s -g
o ป
ป-) O

f S
O *13

^ 8
*< o
n o
3 to
ซ*• o
T 01 3
o v m
1 01
ป __ rt- >
^ (t t-*
-1 X1 B rt-
-1 1 0
ซ o" 3
T5 1 P
g g. ?
_ t> ft)
O
P CO
* H rt

O f-^ a
"b & g

r** to

*""* f
(? (tป
r W 0
r*^-*^-' d- 2
I ^ "'
L ^ 2
W r* f*
' S" S"
3
O
8


O

a
R

0
rt-
0






6"
V
fo




























. T)
C}


M



CO




0
"fl
ป
**

*tJ
ง
m
ง

O


O
o
'*ฃ


$1

S
o

i
S


W
K
13
1-}
a
5j
























-------
(2)  To establish the resource  rec^/ery  ;schr._i
     —  Feasibility  study of Zlcr.Lr.-al. T_ •->..": lories


(3)  To establish a  total system, icr  resource  recovery
     •*•  Conceptual Systems Design and Incentives


(4)  To propose a solution to environment:-- problems associated
     V7ith the municipal waste -->-  Impacts  Assessment and l-cll_ticn
     Control
     The project plan, in  its  firs~  phase  (Phase I)/  thus i

the feasibility study of selectee,  eler.enr.ai  technologies ana the

conceptual design of a total syster:..   The  ?hasa II,  based on the

results of Phase I, proposes a demonstration of the  total system

with particular emphasis on the technological aspect.


     The basic project concept and plan are  summarized ir.

Figure 2.

-------
                         R & D  PROGRAMS
Selection of the Program Fields

     Elemental Technology  -  In a resource recovery system, the
subsystems may be identified as the basic processes that should
be termed here as elemental technologies.  The concept of an
elemental technology is somewhat similar to that of a unit
operation or unit process in the chemical industry.  Elemental
technologies, in the development stage, may be divided broadly
into two categories; peripheral or interfacial elemental techno-
logy and critical elemental technology.

     The former is the elemental technology like the magnetic
separator or the mechanical composting technology, that has been
already applied- to the resource recovery of the municipal refuse,
proved to be an established technology, and has no further need
for R & D.  The facility or equipment of this type of elemental
technology is already on the market and can be procured with
specifications.

     The critical elemental technology, on the other hand, is
an important technology and considered critical in the R & D.
One kind under this elemental technology is the technology based .
on totally new concept or principle.  Another kind under this
category is the technology, such as pyrolysis, that has been
practiced in other fields of technology but has not been applied
to resource recovery.  And this newer application to resource
recovery may require the feasibility study.

     The present R & D is thus mainly concerned with the critical
elemental technology.

-------
M  e< rj
   ป   ป
sz  c> m
PC?)
ct-    r*-
 4  M  O
ซ4  o

 p> ^  o
 Q  ''J  4
 4  P
    cr  hi
 M     O
 P  M  M
 P. P  M
 d  CT-  d
 M  O  cr
 cr 4  ~-
 4  P  O
^,  c1-  :;
••   c

        e
    4
i-3'-i
<
 O  P  O
    •O  CO

    o  d
    4  4
    O  O

        CO
    P
    p-
       Cl
       p-
f?
Ui
ct-
O
la















































ฃป S3 O
0 fi> O
CO O H
COO
o < n>
P- n> >d
f J 4 cr
H- ^ d
P- P
O g I-1
*^— ' P. y
o
ฃC -J
(p p-
d Cj
03 p
(T
0
P P
•a
p Hi
P 0
C+
M P,
P.
ฃ to
M ซ<
ct- U
4 cr
P- 0
P B
fr~*
Hj
oT ^
o
ฃ3" "0
P 0
o w
M O
o d
C*l 4
(B



O
&
1 1




•
t5
O
M*
p
o

C3
cf
0
4
W
Q
to
P-

(0
co

c:
cr
p-
r-j
p-
N
P
j-i-
P-
O
P

"-3
0
w o
(B P'
O O
O P
0 P'
•d o
0 p
I'i M
P-
cr
P-
0

.
O O H^ O "
p. M O ^ P
p. op
S3 o >r ef-
ts $u )T) p;' p-
p (n -3
— ' c* (5
rt> 0
P. y
*: o
P M
GO O
ct- C^

• •
tr1 to o ^-ซ "T!
cf- ซ< O ^ H-1
P. M y p- d
• C+ C/ rf t_-

b P o, P

f-*j p^ P- T>
O - P.
3 tr1 a'
'rj d ซ+ O
c* P* r^' P*
ID P. •
r-1 P- v— ' *r)
N **$
o n> 4
P P> O
CO 1 M
cr V
id ra 01
op. K.
O 05
O ^^
Q W )-j
4 O O
*ซ3 M O
'-< (B
*-N to B)
K P- W
cr co
P ' — PS
40 0
p O 4
3
T5J c?' ^5
S^d H-
d <-t-
P> P- S3
P o ro
03 n
rt- O
d tcs ^
4 ct> (I)
p- P rj
2 c; <<: •
ff} t-t-
o
O 4
ct- O CO
P- M O
O P H
. P CO c*
CO P-
P-
0 P
P b
i P.








t










\

























=T.f Fl3 F^
{-- o 41 co rj
O t*" JU -C C [n '
P- H-  dp P- ป-*>
ct- d P) 4 P*
p. P- p (0 WO
• P. OPซ (Dp
v_^ cr- p. p ct-
co d P- ^ P-
O 4 P ^0
4 P-C5 P
cr P M
p- a? P P P
p p p. p
p3 OP. dp.
O CO
1-3 • CO e* to
 • O 4 
O 4 P- M
p; t-1  P
P <+ P- CO ct-
O P. P -  0 — ^c+-
O O pซ
4 CO p
^ M oq
o* to

 3 OQ
• O
O P
C|3 PJ
to
O (B
fr*^. *tj
P
td H
d P
M ci-
X P-
*<; o
p

p* O
co PJ

n> "r1
CO M-
P
to
cf
P-
n
^g
J3 H*1
W 
"o o
O cr
4 P-
ch 0
p P
Ji 8ฐ
O
a
•
2! M
2S
TJ 4
ป P-
*~s n>
P.

ฃ
p
CO
cr
O


P-
a>
M
p-
a
(p

t-3
hj
p
p
CO
•a
0
4
cr
P

P-
O
p

f^
(D
O
ง"
O
I-J
o

































to
H-
fw
t
!B'
p.




PJ
^B
4
t-^
O
4

-------
     Within a process network for resource recovery, various
fields of elemental technologies may be identified along the
stream of the waste from its source to the ultimate disposal
point.  For the present R & D program purpose, four elemental
technology fields were identified;  (1) collection/transportation,
(2) size reduction/extraction,  (3) decomposition, and (4) re-.
utilization.

     Prior to the project initiation, critical technologies for
each program field were first listed and a dozen of program topics
for R & D were selected.  They are listed in Table 10.

     One kind of sleeted programs, which needed rather basic
research, however were assigned to be conducted at the National
Research Laboratories under AIST, and the other that needed more
advanced technological development were contracted with private
firms that had the potential to carry out the R & D in this field
of technology.

     Systems Studies  -  Because of the complexity of the resource
recovery problems, the importance of a systems approach^ was empha-
sized during the preparation stage of the project in the FY 1972.

     Comprehensive study and assessment on the state-of-the art,
and the subsequent systems analysis and, hopefully, a proposal
of the total system with emphasis of technology, were identified
to be necessary, along with the other "hardware" study programs.
A systems study under the title of  "Conceptual Design of a Total
System for Resource Recovery and Reuse", that is listed in Table 10,
was contracted with the Japan Industrial Technology Association,
a quasi-governmental agency;,
                                                                    i
     The JITA, being aware of the need for the interdisciplinary
(and, perhaps, multi-disciplinary)  study for this project, had

-------
formed, within it, an organization called "Comr.uttee on the Systems
Study of Resource Recovery and Reuse".  The Cornnittee, chaired by
Prof. Dr. Yoshitorfhi Oyarr.a, currently director of the National
Research Institute cf Environmental Sciences, of the Environment
Agency, and the former President of the Tokyo Institute of Techno-
logy, is composed of professionals with various disciplines ranging
from engineering to social psychology.  The Conjnittee also had at
first six and has now three workshops under it.
                             *                                  f
     The first subcommittee, or Workshop on Elemental Technology
is primarily concerned with the technological state-of-the-art in
resource recovery.  It reviews the existing and potential technologies
and makes some evaluations on those technologies.  One function of
the Workshop is to check and review the progress status of the
selected R & D programs conducted by the AIST.

     The Workshop on Systems Analysis, which is the second sub-
committee, is concerned with computer analysis of some problems
identified critical to the project progress and making the necessary
predictions.  In the FY 1973, the Systems Dynamics technique, that
was first developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and
was written in Dynamo Statements of a computer language, was utilized
to analyze and predict the role of PVC  (polyvinylcholoride polymer)
mixed with the Japanese municipal waste.

     The third subcommittee, Workshop on Demonstration Project,
aims at preparing and making assessments on the coming Phase II of
the AIST Project, which is to start from the FY 1976.  The Phase II
of the Project, described briefly in Figure 2, is essentially a
demonstration of the total'resource recovery system at selected
municipalities, and can be comparable with the U.S. counterparts of
EPA.  Currently, members of the workshop are studying the social,
economical and other characteristics of candidate municipalities.

-------
  Brief  Review of Elemental Technology Fields

      Although  the  goal of the project  is  to  establish  the  resource
  recovery  system, a brief review  for each  elemental  technology  field
  may be  appropriate here.  However, before we proceed to  the  re-
  viewing,  the total processing system that we nave in our plan  in
  its generalized form  can be depicted in contrast with  the  existing
  disposal  systems,  as  in Figure 3.  The resource recovery system
  which  is  intended  here is conceptual alternative of the  next
  generation  that would be a substitute  for the  conventional incinera-
  tors or sanitary landfilling.  •

      Collection/Transportation;*  Elemental  technologies in  this
  part of the whole  processing are not directly  related  to resource
  recovery  itself.   However, current importance  of this  technology
  field  and the  relation to the subsequent  processing may  need a
  brief  description.

      Other  than the conventional (packer) truck method,  rails,
  ships  and pipelines are under consideration  for application  of
  refuse collection  and transportation in Japan.  Among  those, the'
  pipeline  collection and transportation is considered most  promising.
  The pipeline has many variations;  vacuum, capsule,  train,  pressure
  and slurry.

      The  facilities of pipeline  transportation are  usually costly
  and not economical for less densely populated  areas.   But  once
  installed,  the operation requires less nan-power and can easily
  automated,  which is considered a great deal  of advantages  ever
  the  conventional truck collection and  transportation.

      Most technologies regarding the pipeline  collection and
  transportation have already developed  on  a commercial  scale,
* Collection and transportation may be dealt with separately.
  But, because of its close relation between them,  no attempt
  was made here to separate them.•

-------
M
b
<-<
in


CO
e-t-
Oq
cr
i
L_
C
3
a
8ป
'l
pT o b i-1 o
h-< i-t hj P O
?r PJ j^ 01 P'
X t— ' J W W
H !•••
w co o
n H
H- p
O M
W CO

- Recycled Values -
Scrap Iron < 	
IConferrous < 	 '
Containers < 	
Glass Gullet < 	
Paper, Pulp < 	
Plastics < 	
Coaipost, Hunus < 	
Fuel Gas, Oils < 	
Coke, Chars < 	
Energy (Heat) < 	
Building <
Materials
T) M "n ฃ">
M tf ?) P
!u 
$
W
h;
iT>
ct-
I
^
i
V
V
>
i—
>i

HoBout'ce Recovery System
C:'
*-^ X^ o O ^C ^ rfl ^r? O
C: ft (T) ^ O M ฃ ฃ p
t-i H- H ju o K '51 "3 H
X- p ii CO |3ป K 1-'' 0 O*
<0i1lป
CO r" I- >-i - Oj
:-: o o - <ป
(1) M O CO W
M ปi tr* P
,-t- . P rtt Ol
(I) .01 p CO
tj) CO rr
(I)
I
E
1
'
ollection/Trar:sportation
(2) Rrfuse Landfill Hj-.it.ea
(-•
i
j
i
i
— ' ^v
ง! ^
?. x

i
-n !
i ! i
|
s/ ' y 4'
~ *- 'i- 1
ra p: ; i-1 i
H- 14- ra
ฃ ^ O
o s: P
X J) CO
.-*•
i-3  -? '->
^"03"
ซ> p (II
3 (T ~
rt- 3 ri-
ll
r
i
1 '
\y • v ^
V \ ' ^
<

'• Rofupe Tncinerition Syaten


-------
                                                         -47-
and it appears to be not necessary to initiate new R & D programs
except that of slurry pipeline transferring.

     Slurry transportation of the waste or other materials like
coal may be very important, particularly for the wet processing
that follows.  Municipal waste slurry, because of the largest
content of paper, behaves, in the pipe, in somewhat similar way
as the cellulosic slurry.  The waste slurry contaminated with
dirts, and other inorganics, is a complex Non-Newtonian  fluid
and its flow characteristics are not known well.  The basic
engineering data for designing such pipeline transportation is
considered to be of extreme importance.

     Size Reduction/Extraction:  For size reduction, shredding
is most commonly employed for the municipal refuse handling, in
which combination of shearing, compression, and impact forces
are utilized effectively.  Hence the shredding technolocy is
considered to be a peripheral elemental technology and not for
any further R & D.  However, shredders that operate at the room
temperature have such environmentally adverse effects like noises,
vibrations and dust, and are often not acceptable for its aesthetical
and hygienic reasons.  In addition to those demerits, shredders
require normally greater power consumption and rather frequent
maintenance job and the shreds coming from this type of equipment
are not suitable for effective materials extraction operations
normally that follow for resource recovery, because of their size
'distribution -and lumping.

     Cryogenic shredding, in contrast with the ordinary temperature
shredding, is becoming known to compensate some of the latter's
disadvantages.  The basic principle of cryogenic shredding is
as follows:  Any solid material when- exposed under the cryogenic
 (low temperature) conditions shows a marked embrittleness for a
certain temperature range.  This physical property may be utilized

-------
effectively for size reduction and the subsequent selective
extraction of certain, material
     Various coolants may bo
For both economical and safe
-195.8ฐC) is most promising.
as a by-product for oxygen pr
inert gas.  The latent heat
often suggested for another s
direct utilization of this
of LNG plant location and its
                             possible tor waste processing.
                            ty reasons, liquid nitrogen  (b.p. =
                              Liquid nitrogen is normally produced
                             eduction frcrr. air and is totally
                            (of vaporization) of imported LNG are
                             ource of cooling energy; nevertheless,
                            (cooling) heat seer.s impossible because
                              need for special handling.
                         favor
     Firsthand estimates
shredding to the resource rec
environmental effects accompa!
shredding would be removed.
cation needs further research
advantage of using considera^
normal liq.N2/refuse ratio
weight basis) may or may not
     Technologies associated
are based on a wide variety o
air or hydro-dynamics, parti
conductivity, magneticity, el
and so on.
     Thus the selection of
is usually very difficult.  I
placed on that the technology
system should perform most ei
size reduction and downstrear.
And the feasibility for the
                               the application of cryogenic
                              very processing, because most adverse
                             nied by the crdi.iary temperature
                             However, this newer technology appii-
                              and development.-  Economical dis-
                             le amount of liquid nitrogen  (the
                           rajnges from 0.3 to nearly 1, on the
                             be compensated with many advantages.
                             with materials extraction, in general,
                             f principles:  gravity  (or density),
                            die size or shape  (screening), electrical
                             ectrostc.tic force, optical property,
                           critj
                             itical technologies for R & D purpose
                             or the AIST programs, importance was
                               s a component of a total processing
                             f actively with respect to upstream
                              backend components of technology.
                            Japanese waste was emphasised, too.

-------
     Air classification technology wa:j selected because the
technology had never been properly applied to tho wet Japanese
refuse, though the air classifier is cper cited on a. comnorcial scale
abroad.  Plastics extraction in rather purified forms cf pellets
or powder by means of organic solvent (xylene) was another example
to study its applicability to the plastics-rich Japanese waste.
The seni-v/et selective pulverizing system, with a great success
already with the completion of the first year of R & D, is con-%
sidered best fitted to the Japanese waste separation.

     For separation of the inorganic fraction, most of the con-
ventional processing technologies may be applicable that have beer.
in practice in the minerals processing.   However, newer technology
may be worthy to be studied also.  \ technology for separating
various non-ferrous metals by means of magnetic fluid  (Ferrofluid^cs,
for example) is a R & D program currently underway.  This can be
said of a processing with a heavy medium with variable, but con-
trollable by a dial, apparent density to separate selectively the
metals, one kind at a time.
     Decomposition:  Solid-wastes may be decomposed thermally,
chemically and biologically.  In view of its importance, let us
restrict our discussion here to only the thermal decomposition
of the organic matter.  Pyrolysis, in its strict sense, is the
thermal decompostion in an oxygen lacking environment.  However,
often known "pyrolytic" processes include partial oxidation  (or
combustion) and, may be not called pyrolysis strictly.  Because
of this, the term "thermal decompostion" is used here in a much
broader sense than pyrolysis, and distinguished from the incinera-
tion or combustion in that the latter is the thermal decompcsitic:
with an excess amount of air or oxygen.

     As stated earlier, the thermal decompaction is one of the
most promising technologies for resource recovery, because it can

-------
                                                         -50-
be used for conversion materials recovery as well as energy recovery
in a storable and transportable form.  --ior; than a dozen processes
                             [uroose both in Jar>an and abroad.
are being proposed for this p
Nevertheless, it may be agree
completely workable on a cornm
                             I thot none has been proved to be
                             ercial scale v'ith the products being
recovered in an acceptable manner.
     General conditions for s
processes are considered more
of the higher raoisture conten
fraction of the Japanese wast
essentially cellulosic with
                             access of these thermal decomposition
                              stringent in Japan, simply because
                             t of the Japanese refuse.  The organic
                             a, however, is stiil considered
                            s0me amount of hydrocarbons from plastics,
     in analyzing a thermal d
material, two distinguished r
identified; endothermic and e
organic matter be decomposed,
first the enthalpy of the mat
and then enable the decompost
instances, is endothermic.  A
state of the matter proceeds,
the products and the surround
(or are) usually exothermic.
utilizing superheated steam,
condensation reactions are su
reactions could occur in a se
depending on the reaction sch

     At any event, the reacto
reactions effectively and eff
various classifications of th
possible:

     The way of supplying the
                              compostion process of rhe solid organic
                              action stages should be clearly
                             •cothermic.  In order thac the solid
                              heat must be supplied to increase
                              rial to a decomposition temperature
                              on reaction occur, which, in :r:ost
                               the decomposition to lov;er molecular
                              the second stage reaction(s) between
                              ng gases will take place,.which is
                              Partial oxidation, hydrogenation
                              r carbon monoxide, and certain
                              h examples.  First and second stage
                              ies or almost simultaneously,     •
                              me and the reaction conditions.

                              (3) is so designed that the selected
                              ciently be taken place.  Thus the
                               thermal de compos tier, processes are
                              heat of the- first endothermic stage

-------
may divide the processes into, 1) external heating, 2) internal
heating, and 3) partial oxidation processes.  Or, according to the
major final product scate, another y/ay of subdivision of the
processes are, 1) gasification, 2) liquefaction, and 3) carbonization,
One has to know, however, that, in either one of these processes,
three phases of the final products do exist; for example, in a
gasification process, a small amount of liquids and solids  (chars
or inorganic residue) are obtainable as by-products.

     Equipmental features often become the name of the processes;
1) single, and 2) combined, or dual reactor pyrolytic systems, or
1) fluidized-bed, 2)fixed, or packed-bed, and 3)rotary kiln reactor
processes.  Furthermore, operational characteristics divide the
equipment types to; 1) batch, 2) continuous, and, 3) semi-continuous
processes.

     With these diversified nodes of thermal dacompostion processes,
one may easily imagine, by the combination of those subdivisions,
how many processes could be possible.  The point is, however, that
a pyrolytic process  must first satisfy the basic disposal and
resource recovery principles cited earlier  (see Table 9) and be
efficiently operable, without causing any environmentally adverse
effects.

     For the AIST R & D programs in this elemental technology field,
three fundamental researches and two more advanced, practical
developments were selected.   (Refer to Table 1C).

     Basic studies include, 1} fi::ed-bea gasification of molded
waste,  2) catalytic and hyarogenation fluidized-bed reaction for
liquid  products, and  3) combined reactor system  for gasification.

     Fluidized-bed gasification and liquefaction are two contracted,!
but 100 percent  supported by the AIST, selected  R & D r>rograms

-------
in this technology field.

     We believe, with these
decomposition, that, by the c
able to tell which would be
Japanese solid waste under a
                           t
     Re uti1i zation:  Element
range from incinerator resid
inanufetcturing process from c
range of technologies and cai
manner.

     The importance of this T
final product(s) should have
words, the products have al
the usual lower grade of the
disadvantageous in the marke
     One basic research prog
at one of the AIST's Laborat
of incineration and pyrolysi:
smaller fraction of metals c
certain ceramics, along with
concern.
Target oฃ Major Selected R &
     1) Low Tcnosrature Shre
To separate PVC plastic frac
separated plastic wastes bv
  ive research progress of thermal
  nd of the Phase I tern/ we will be
  ,he best pyrolytic process for the
  certain set of condtions.
  1 technologies under this category
  .e reutilization to wallboard
  mpost humus.  They cover so wide
   not 'be classified in any specific
  rocess, however, lies in that the
  the higher marketability.  In other
r^ady an established market value and
  products from waste should not be
   opportunities.
  am of this project is being conducted
  ry, which is aimed at the reutilization
   residues.  Because of relatively
  ntained in them, tiles, bricks and
  application of chars, are the major
  D Pro or a ITS
  .c.ina and Separation of Plastic VJastes
 Lion selectively out of the source
 :neans of refrigeration.

-------
     2) Cryogenic Shredding Technology for Sulky _^as_to3_;  To
perform an effective size reduction and separation of complex
products or materials that occupy major fractions of bulky wastes
and are not suitable for regular shredding.

     3) Air Classification and Related Sorting System.:  For the
first year program, to classify the humid Japanese waste effectively
into the organic and inorganic fractions by means of air classificatie
technology.

     4) Semi-wet Shredding and Classification Process:  To classify
the damped or moisturized waste into easily processable fractions
and separate the values, like pulp stock, with higher purity.

     5) Magnetic Fluid Sorting Technology for Nonferrous Metals;
To separate valuable nonferrous metals, such as aluminum, copper,
zinc, etc., out of the nonmagnetic inorganic mixture of the waste.

     6) Fluidized-bed Thermal Decomposition Process for Oil Recovery:
To obtain oils or liquid fuel products effectively by the thermal
decompostion of the organic fraction of refuse.

     •?) Fluidized-bed Pyrolysis/Conbustion Dual Reactor System for
Fuel Gas Recovery:  To apply the dual rector pyrolysis technololgy
to obatin high caloric fuel gas out of the organic component of
solid waste.

-------
           DEVELOP; :C:-TT  STATUs
Low Temperature ฃh re eld in a  anc
     First year work  (FY 1973
ature pysical properties,  lik
heat transmission  test  of  pla
range, and the feasibility of
eratures.  Those studies pro\
the subsequent separtion of
was feasible.
Fv
     Second year study  develc
purpose and provides  the  equi
fications for the whole process
shredders.
     Construction  and  operati
capacity of 50 Xg/hr should  b
the final continuous operatic
(in Tokyo) in order to accu.T.u
followed till March 31,  1976.
Cryogenic Shredding  Technology for Bulky Wastes
i.e., by March  3i,  1975.   In
equipment was constructed to
rr.a-hine motors,  steel  coded t
steel, hard plastics,  rubbers
particle size distribution, i
  OF 1-7..iso.0. :i j< D ?:.-.OG ?--.:•! s
  Separation of ?.'::r>cic Pastes
)  includes basr.c  study  on  lev; temper--
e erabrittler.css,  of plastic  materials,
stic wastes in the low  temperature
 shr^c'.ding opera-uions at lover te:r.p-
cd the lew ten.perature  shredding and
7C oolv^.srs from  other  Clastic wastes
 ps an optical process  for  this
 pmental desin ana. operational speci-
    includiha the coolinq-duct and the
 ons of a pilot plant with  a  processing
 e cor.pleto.cl by the autun.n  of 1975  and
   u^ing the source separate;'..! plastics
 late the perfornirnce data  should be
  complete v;ithin this  fiscal  year,
 its lirst •/..•ar, a batchv/ise coerar.ed
 test such non-crushables  as washing
 ires,  or the like, to  recover copper,
 ,  etc.   Shredding characteristics,
  r exar.ple, and cyogenic  properties

-------
of the constituent materials ware  studied  r-r:cl <>.; optimal set of
operational conditions v.'aa  searched  -co  i\n.ni;;u ze tht  amount of
liquid N^ to'bo consumed.   Also  an ringir.eor.in>-; design of e con-
tinuously operated equipment, which  \,as patented,  vv.s completed.

     At present, the continuous  process e^vlp.v.ont with 1 ton/'nr
capacity has been constructed and  soon  t.:e 'J.ata collection
operations should start.  Economical feasibility should be studied
concurrently.
Air Classification and  Related  Sorting Sj s~^\

     A 1 ton/hr  (dry basis)  pilot  plant having throe major units
of horizontal ,• vertical zig-zag air classifiers and a vibrc-ting
     n
scree, was designed, constructed,  and operated to separate the
organic and .inorganic fractions effectively from the Japanese
refuse.  First, prepared wastes with different compositions and
p.oisture contents, and  then  actual waste were used to test the
process performance.    With  an  "as-received" refuse with moisture
content of 42  percent,  the data shcv/ed a better -Chan expected result
for  the separated orcanics  with nore than 99 percent purity,
while the separated inorganic fraction v:?.s contaminated vith the
organics and resulted in a purity  being less than expected.

     Currenly  in'its second  year program,  a process for recovering
plastic rriaterials in refined forra  frora the 'separated organic .strearr.
by air classificatioa is being  developed.   A y.ilot pla..t, bjcGad en
a bench-scale  laboratory test  for  this solvent  (xylone) refining
process, v/as designed and is being asser-jled new.   The test opera-
tions shall soon begin  to collect  the performance data.

     The third and  final year program includes ircitorials extraction

-------
from the inorganic fraction ob
process consisting essentially
separation methods is planned
and glass.  The latter half of
organize all processes develop
sorting (materials recovery) s
  tained from air classification.  A
    )f froth floatation and heavy media
  to recover ferrous raetal, aluminum
   the third year shall be devoted to
  ed during the three years as a total
  vstera.
Se/ri-wet Pulverizincr  and Clas
     The technology based on a
in a troiur.el-like equipment.
moisture or damped; if necessa
drum with screen holes and harr
at a different speed.  Homogen
diffusion of the moisture and
hammering actions take place
move in the horizontal, longit
selected materials as being r.
classified automatically.  Thr
refuse has been proved most pr

     Tests done by a modal and
in the first year research evi
refuse was essentially all hie
And a waste paper processor rs
fraction on a trial .basis, ana
recovered material.  This is p
separate the paper  (recyclable
mixed refuse.without any known
(No air, water and possibly s
to the less power consumption
  sification Process
   totally newer concept is substanciated
  The municipal waste with as-received
  try, is fed -co one end of the rotating
  uers equipped. wi~h inside and rotating
  ization of the waste through the
  the size reduction by tumbling arid
 almost simultaneously as the waste
  adinal direction.   During this process,
oulverized will be screened out a.*d
   e stagowise classification of the
   ctical with an acceptable efficiency.

   module units  (both operated batchwise)
  denced that one of the classified
    qualify recyclable waste paper.
  covered paper sheets from this
   guaranttecd the quality of the
   ob.nbiy the simplest process to
   alone for better sake) fro.?, tho
   e n v 1 •: o rime n t a 11 y d i s a d v a r. t; a c.- e s .
 oti.1 pollutions are expected, in addition
  than the conventicr.ai orocesses.)

-------
     'iTiiF  \-<:i\r.  :i ;•; cie^'o^ed i\:.i.i nl.y  • .-•  :--^'  Jc:a'.ion ol. t:nc  tost
I'.xxlul'_> r,'ui.ni.;c nt to a im'jor mo-! ••''_ rn:r. 'o c.i-::c.:: the rcc.la-up
factor.  And  the- desifjyii:,':; or 2  '•..,;:;/' r -'i:glo drum continuous
oquivMont  is  ?--a:.n-j con;: coacar r •<•• L "-.•• ••;  t>.3 2~uipricnt "..'ill  be
assembled,  by  tho end of thi b ,':\ ...-•; ul  -or.:.

     In the next yeor, a cle^onsti.c-.:;.io;-: plaiifc of this process will
be constructed.  <-„•': a landfillin-j  oij:o oi: ^ suburban city- of Tokyo.
and further porfoj-'inance data v/ill bj r-co'.-riulated before  con'^e
          Fluid Sorting 1'(jchno3.:..'c:y  /o,  •;^:'.-- .'errors I let  1 5
     The magnetic fluid, which consists of magnetite  (Fe^O^)
particles  of ca.  100 A average diamster coated with a  surface-
active reagent and suspended in  a  base medium, usually water  or
kerosene,  plays a central role in  this separation technology.
The fluid  once placed in a magnetic  field, possesses an  apparent
density corresponding to the field force.   A particle  of any  non-
ferrous metal submerged in this  fluid, therefore, may  either  float
or sink, depending on its specific gravity.  And this  is the
principle  of this technology.

     A batchwise equipment was built in the. first year program and
the some basic research was conducted for the feasibility of  the
process for the waste.  The process  input must be an inorganic
residue after the ferrous metals extracted completely  by a magnetic
separator  and a mixture of non-ferrous metals and glass, ceramics
or the like.  The first year study concluded that both floating anc
sinking units were necessary for effective separation  of aluminum
and copper.  And also some means to recover the valuable fluid
that would be carried over along with the separated metals must be

-------
developed.  Otherwise econo>:J
o.x;3cnsivci magnetic  medium sec:

     The second year  program :
tinuous process equipment vir.1
unit of pretreatrrent  by moans
matals and an additional medii
the raain part, of  the  process.
obtainable within this  vear.
                                 not
         ••: isric; ,

         tno dcy:. Loprr ^nt of a con-
         y  c,': 100  X~._ hr.  LnJ an'
         2 u r r e n t i1;: ?j a r a t i o ;i o f n o n -
                              ara rocovcry unit v/ill be  attached to
                                The perfcr;r.ance cliica  are  to  be
                                3ir.e ira:-:e-up experiiucntal  rur.s  may
be necessary  before  commercialization ;. .•: ihe next fiscal year of
1975.
Fluidized-be'd Therrr.al  Decorr.Do.sition
     First year  experimental
plant with reactor  of 160 ram j
plastic coir.position^'v/ere used
fuel product.  Also process h
determine the way to supply h
the fluidized-bed reactor.  Tl
partial oxidation taking plac
without much changing the hea
                              study was pe:cforr.-_-d utilizing a oiloi
                              0.   Simulated wastes with  varying
                               to invostigers  Lhe yield  of  liquid
                              eat balance v.ras  studied  in order to
                              eat to decomposition reaction in
                                 result seemed favo.rable for the
                              o in the reactor for oil recovery
                               ing value of the liquid product.
     The first  few  months oฃ
devoted to investigating the
* Current price per  liter  of
  ca. 100,000 yens,  or  350  U.
  will drop to'1,000 yens,  or
  of commercialization.
                                                 Oil Recovery
                              •;he second year  (FY 1974)  is  being
                              process performance with  an  actual
                                                           is
.his liquid  for  research use
'. dollars.   I'.7e  expect ~c.he. ^rice
3 dollars per Titer by the time

-------
        A scale-uc  reactor  with diameter cf bOO ras p  is  in  its
d^sl :?ninj' .-;tage and  soon  will bo co;:stnt-..:L-:•.:";.  In -che third  year,
nearly a co-onercial  scale plant will bo constructed and operated
for thi actual waste on a continuous basis.
Fl u icj. K cd --bed P •_ • r oly s is/Coinbu .-rtior; Dua, ' :.-.Jjctor__ S y stem  for
     The basic  idea  ex  thiu proc^cn ifj as follows:  The  sand,
fluidization rr.cdiun,  mixed v:ith charr; producec in the pyrolyric
reactor flows to  the  second coirhuotion reactor v:here the  air  is
bein^ blcv/n frcra  the  bottom, and the burning cf the chars  take  oLr.ca,
The heated sand in the  corpus t ion reactor and. being free  of chars
any more then travels back to the first pyrolytic reactor threuch
a pipe to provide the heating and reaction energy to the  shredded
waste.  Thus the  sand,  through circulating between the two reactors,
acts as an energy carrier and rhe two reactors are normally in a
therraally equilibriated state with a certain feed rate.

     This dual  reactor  systerr. has bec-r-. a:;oloysd in petroleur:.
cracking process  and not totally n.3w.  Th 3 c;dvantages cf  this  syh'cc. "p.
are that the process  is suitable for higher caloric gases and
the operation can easily be autoiv.a-cd because cf its inhorenc  stc.bil

     The first  year  study was !•:••:; inly concerned on the pyrolytic
reactor section.  (Cortibustion reactor that could be combined xvith
is in a v;ide spread  use already.)  Thv-s a single reactor  v.Titn
diameter 300 rn p systeir. v;as designed end ths feasibility of  v.ha
                             t
pyrolysis process to the Japanese wa^te v;as chocked. _ Uasfi  pauer
stock being pulverized  was use.d to test tho equipment.   ?.nd a  fuel
can with the lower heating value of nearly 4,000 Kcal/Kra-5 was
obtained at about 830 ฐC.  Xoiscuro content was a testing parad
and an interesting result v;as obtained.

-------
     Currently, the sand circulufcic
of the sane geometry of the reactor
And the design of a reactor fjyjten
is being performed.

     In the final year, a nodule si
and tested of its feasibility on th
  is tested en a model unit
 -•ysteiiL at the room temperature
  'ch 500 mm 0  for each reactor
?o plant will be constructed
-,  actual waste.
Conceptual Design of a Total System

     A partial description of the a
coiitracted study was made earlier.
     Current major activity of the
the preparation for the coming ?has
that shall start from the FY 1976.
 for Resource Recovery and Reuse
:tivities being done under this
;ee Systems Studies, en pp 42-44
Systems Study Committee is abou
e II demonstaration programs
                                                                         N

-------
     \:e  c.ro  nc\r (FY 1074)  in  th:. ^—'lo -.-•-. or.
I;-;-,---, of  Fhc-so I o(r t:V;o A 1ST1?;  i.o;_o>irc-  %?cc/-:y  :?.nc? Reuss Project.
.'-s ntcitec"  r-ortJ.7 earlier,  tho  ob j o c <:.:  *-_:; •;••" .. hu^e  I are; 1} technical
c;!i~ systo.i f.o a ~ ibili ty of  s"2 oc !:• •-; -:".-••.-• :^;."!.  ti,chr.o].cgiG:: . •.; a^ply
u'".\ r tlio  0 an;jncjsc: ; >h;ysi Ceil ^r.c"! :~''/c-.:il <• •::.•':! •Li.cnj .  and 2; cor.ceotvic'l
resign o/  a  toLcl xystrri for  .-fj  ":^:.'v\: •'.. "ou . cc  recovery .vsteris
ir'/lcronrctio^s.  ?.t the CLIC!  of •;;:••:. /!'•.;;,: 1.  •-."•.•  couli not cstimata,
hc\;3ver, that all el cr.i-^nto.l Loo^-iolo ,_L .-" c-:,-v^lo_jcd  under t'.u Project
and/or tha total systoia prcposoci should be irrrplerr.^nted shortly
thereafter on a "coraraercial"scale.

     The reasons for this  nay  be as follows:   Firstly, those~1:ech-
nologies,  unlike the conventional production  technologies, for  lack
of economical interest, should not be implemented without any
economical aids or incentives  of any form.  Secondly, nrtn.icipalities
are considered still not yet  being ready enough  to  accept the
resource recovery concept  in  a. raore realistic manner.  Thirdly, and
most important of all, the system demonstration, which is nest  needed
by the municipality instead of single technology demonstration
would have not yet performed  then.

     Because of these reasons, most municipalities  being still  within
amortization period of current disposal  (mostly  incineration)
facilities may find the resource recovery systems  implementation
too risky  to take both in  the  economical and  technical terms.   There-
fore, we have to conclude  that we need the systems  demonstration
for a certain period of time  before municipalities  would start
implementing the systems safely.

-------
Ovtlin.i oฃ Phase  II_ Plan

     B^sed on the need  justii'i
a cicr.onstration project for  tn
followed by the current Phase
include as rauch results of the

     The outline of  the Phase
Po_r_Lo:l: Three to  five years  st
Total Bucxactal Aoorpuri^t: on ":-
        or  33 million  U.S.  do
I'-'athod: Construction, operatic.
        plants in selected mun
Demonstration Plant: Prototype
        to be demonstrated.  P
        ing to the locality  an
        generally mere  than  10
        necessary to dem.onstra
        include total systems,
        like incinerator, as ti
        systems centered en  ma

     For the demonstration pla
the refuse and the site on whi
made.  The AIST, or  the Governi
guarantiee plant hardwares,  ccj
durina r.he demonstration oeri
     Training of employees of
the plant under extreme condtic
on market opportunities of rsc
the environmental impacts, are
the selected municipality.
                                                           • c> z -
 d above, the AIST is now planning
  Pha^e II that should be directly
    Tho sys~d;:a we would pursue may
 Ph <
I t:orm as possible.
 I p.lc,n may 'be briefed as  follcvd:
 rting v;it/i FY 1976.
      : Approxiiaately 10 billion yens,
  and evaluation of several demonsrration

 systems that match the local  conditions
 ant processing capacity varies  accord-
  demons traticn purpose.  Ucvcever,
  tons of refuse per day may be
 e the economical factors.  Prototypes
 each including the existing facilities)
 e subsystems.  Others may include  :
 erials recovery and/or energy recovery.

 ts, municipalities should provide
 h the plant construction would  be
 ent, on the other hand, should
 struction, operation and maintenance
 her municipalities, operations of
 n,s of incoming refuse, assessments
covered materials or energy, and on
 olanned v.'ith the consultation of

-------
do3l':c:;. ,  t;>o v,:.n]^j  ;jl^-
b;.:-;od on  i;ho gc.^oral t- i:
Or  iil;:c;-  it  con id ar-l: ih
<'. t, '-i-\ ,  h?.d  ^l<3  :r;'anicipality so
,00  :-.;.••; _:i _-.••>.:;. "-.y  the  muni cipality
u I •:.•-.' .%.': C.'-. / ^rr.^.ent  properties.

-------
COXC1USIGNS
     From the discussions in  th
following concluding rorr.arks  r..a
  A. The old syle ''ro.gir.an recyc
in Japan.
  B. Increased public awareness
rru.-riicipal refuse has ijcen obser
yc-ars .
  C. For processing  (disposal o
approximately 20 percent indust
with the regular waste causes v
  D. Source separation is consi
Municipalities, mostly not for
disposal processing.   (Separati
expected damage to the inciner
  E. The main features of the J
with the U.S. refuse, are highe
than 50 percent) and higher fra
10 percent).
  F. The Japanese paper recycle
the figure of the U.S. counterp
still further.
  G. Incinerators are irt a wide
municipalities.  But heat recov
being done in Eurooe.
                             nci
  II.  Industrial and public  (ir
sectors show a great deal of in
the municipal refuse.  And vario
ta^en.
                                 fir.-;t half of the paper,  the
7 DO sU-V-mar
ling" is currently seldom seen

 for resource recovery from the
vod ' especially for the last two

r resource recovery)purpose,
rial waste rorn'ially coming mixed
arious trouble to the municipality,
derably wide spread among Japanese
recycling but for more effective
on of plastic products because of
 or, for example.)
                              at
                               apanese municipal refuse,  compared
                                 average moisture content (more
                               ction of plastics  (reaching  nearly

                                ratio is exceedingly higher than
                               irt, and anticipated to  increase

                                spread use among the Japanese
                               ery is not performed as  much as
   ing the Central Government)
terest in resource recovery from
 us efforts are beginning to be

-------
                                                        -65-
  1. Technological problems identified here include processing of
waste contaminated v/ith hazardous materials, storing of putrescible
ro;i:ub--j or recovered materials, and resource recovery processing of
source separated materials.
  J. Nontechnological problems identified here include economics
of recycling processing and recycled resources, and social accept-
ability of the resource recovery concept and recycled resources.
The solution of these problems would take much longer time than
the technological ones.

     Conclusions, based on the AIST's Project description in the
latter half of the paper, may be as follows:
  A. R & D programs are being conducted on selected "critical"
elemental technologies.  And the problems encountered were identified
not much of technical feasibility, rather of systems feasibility.
  B. One of the difficulties in the resource recovery process
designing is to synthesize a processing system that absorbs the
input refuse variations in compostion and quantity.
  C. System design or process synthesis techniques for resource
recovery systems that must satisfy the diversified local conditions
has not been developed in a satisfactory manner.  The need for this
kind of study should be emphasized.
  D. ET" & D programs performed during the Phase I period alone may
not be sufficient for the municipality to implement as a resource
recovery system.  And the Fhase II of the Project may be necessary
for the svstem demonstration before ~che municipality employs the
system, shown by the AIST without much technological as well as
economical risks.
                                       c
  E. Currently planned Phase II include^ construction, operations,
maintenance and assessments of the demonstration plant of several
selected cities.

-------
     The MITI, with its consci
has been and shall promote, th
resource recovery systems, and
eccr.or'ical and administrative
resources from various wastes
cooperation of civic and indus
                                                         -66-
vation of energy and materials policy,
rouoh tho AIST, R & D programs on
, thrcuc-h its" other Bureaus, various
incentive programs to conserve the
 including industrial waste, with
trial sectors.

-------
-r,-"•-•-• -•'.-.- ~ n  :-.
;-.r.i  -az^iytic Pyrclysis  Technology



     risl  Devalop^er.-c  Laboratory

-------
   RESEARCH CONCERNING THE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF RE-USE OF

       ORGANIC HIGH POLYMERS" WASTES BY CATALYTIC HYDROCRACKING

(THE PURPOSE OF THIS RESEARCH)

  It is a purpose of this research to get basic data for establishment

of a process to dispose organic high polymers' wastes by catalytic hydrocracking

and to convert them into completely harmless and reusable substances.

(THE PROGRESS OF THIS RESEARCH UP TO THE PRESENT DATE)

  Using a batch autoclave, we have being hydrocracked the organic high
                                 *
polymers in the presence of various catalysts and investigated the conversion

and the properties of reaction products at the reaction temperatures of 250 -^

500*C and the reaction hydrogen pressures of 20^-200 Kg/cm" •

  We hydrocracked cottons,polyatylene.polypropylenetphenolresinfand melamina

resin under the above reaction conditions.

     Polystylene could be hydrocracked to alkylbenzenes.

     Polypropylene could be..hydrocracked to C,~C,. paraffine gases and

                                            gasoline fractions.

     Phenol resine could be hydrocracked to alkylphenols.

     Melamine resin could.be hydrocracked to ammonia,methane,and amino methanes*

     Cotton could be hydrocracked to C,~C^ paraffine gases,alcohols,and

                                            '              aldehydes.

  (NEXT STEP 0? THIS INVESTIGATION)                       '  "

   Organic. fcigh polymers such as celluloses and plastics have a uniform

and regulaly ordered moleculer stracture.

   In order to utilizedtheir wastes efficiently, it would be most desirable

to convert them selectively into monomers.

   Following the present work, we will try to hydrocrack typical high polymers

catalitically, at the  same time  to investigate the hydrocracking reaction

process and to get basic data for designing a disposing plant*

-------
                      in *•-
                                  -
                                  O. a,

                                  o-e
                                U=    O
                      urr Q u. LU p

                      T-Osl CO >J-LOCD
O
1—100—!
ILO       I
                                                                      "S
                                                                      TJ
                                                                       
-------
#*
•u >^
^1 '
/;-.-:::•* *
? . Jyf :,:.:-
' ft /
' T^— -J> >-
O Ovs ฐ
- >V\^ -s ~Q
J— \ \^ - h fll J

**—
aQ- :
ฃ ^c:
c

o
CT
N ^
•^ o
in
V -o
aป
r J **"•
k-
o
^

                 6P
                 V
                 a
                                    8
"O
 OJ
CQ
•o
 N
5
.2
LL.
 t/)
 u
 o
*c cc
Si

cง
                                CN
                                •g
                                L.

-------
                                                      r// / a r/w  Lti .
                                                   (D
           fy
                                            1SL
                                             t/U
• V'' i  /  * i
zlJ q/ -&.
    2?
                                                       ttt*
                                                            - / :
          S~\
          (3)
#?
            yn,
           .
        V/iiJlol
          (?)
                                        0
                                                       f
                                                      ts*
                                                             _)ta
       A
                                       •JaJttfii
                                  "7
                   -/
                                                      O-txC  /Vป7
             c)
                                              ^r  2.0 ;

                                                    \JL/  / 11& ^tiL+l
             d)
                • Q ^  ^.P

                                 *  Pf. PP. PE ,
                                                                 ^4^
                                                       JM.
                                            ^a

                                                             •/
                                                            0*0
Jl
                                              'd
                                   1ฃ
                               /~ C^CL

-------
          AA2,  04
                is-^A*.
               XO "d
                •w
                  f
               ฃ.~ซ^:
    C/ 7^'
      f.coa  e*~\C
Cป  2>ปo
-------
3

-------
1  ~l.~~ '  "~ '. ~ ~~ ^     ~ ""v '•

-------
   Fixed Bed PyroMsis of .Municipal Organic Solid Wastes Briquett

   N'ationai Research Institute for Pollution and Resources,

   Kawaguchi, Saitama, Jap^n,  332.



   This fundamental research programme deals with not only the resolving

   the impact of solid wastes pollution,  but also resources recovery from

them.

   Pyrolysis using fixed bed for organic solid wastes is to be allowed

easy and steady operation, which is the one well-established at many other

industrial fields. Because constitutions and shapes of solid.wastes vary

with various conditions (time, place and so on).

   The fundamental research has been focussed particularly to;

1, Possibility of briquetting of solid wastes,
                            ป
2, Molding of and removing'water from solid wastes by means of compression

   with or without addition of binding maerials,

3, Thermal decomposition behaviours of briquet as functions of temperatures

   and duration time. The  influences of circumstances and catalysts during

   the decomposition  are to be tested.

4, Material  balance and heat  balance in the'course of thermal decomposition,

5, Concept design of  pyrol^.sis  oven  in the basis of results obtained,

and

q } Analysis  and use of decomposition  products  (gas, liquid and residual char)

-------
Research Programme oil Fixed Type Pyrolysis  Organic  Solid Wastes
Fiscal year
                      Item of Activites
1974
  The constitution of solid wastes and their thermal decom-


  position behaviours,


  Analysis of thermal decomposition products from solid wastes


!  Relation between briquettability and solid wastes constitution

i
I  Molding of and removing water from solid wastes by means
|

j  of compression with or without addition of binding materials,


  Strength of briquett made of solid wastes during drying


  and pyrolysisj


  Mechanical strength and reactivity of char obtained by


  pyrolisis,


  Removing of the pollutants such as gaseous and  liquid S-
            ;   N-, Cl-containing matters.


               Design and building up of fixed bed type oven (carbonizer)


               Material balance and heat balance for solid wastes carbo-


               nization reaction.

-------
                                                                                             m
                                                                                             •3
* -- - r _~^   *

-------
r _ ;ป• it it t -

-------
-. ir.-,i r-j-ctor Pyre lysis  System





.. ;r.-:-,l Cha.'.ical Laboratory for Industry

-------
                 Development of the Hybrid^ Retort



                 to Gasify Urban Refuse







                          National Chemical Laboratory for Industry
  Tha hybrid^ retort is a gasification plant which has invented in




National Chemical Laboratiry for^ Industry as a unit process in the



resource recovery system for urban refuse.




  The hybrid*- retort ia characterized by the idea that the retort ia not a  -



single unit but is composed of a moving bed gasification unit and ซ, cirtain


                                                                      ••  ,r  •'

type of incinerator so as to make the best use of the two units*  '• The  .




incinerator is allowed to choose any typo of solid gaa reactors- ouch aa a



conventional grata kilo* a rotary kiln, and so on.   While the gasification

                           *                                                -

unit mist be an up flow type of moving bed to which the solid waste ia fed
                                        •U
                                                                            ' t

from the bottom and the incompletely decomposed solid ia discharged from • ,



the top •;.. of the bed as shown in the figure .  The retort  is expected to




 exhibit following effects.                                        '' •   ,



 (1)  By, employing a double stages retort,  the gasification  unit  and the



     incinerator are hybrided to make the process most effective vith &




 sence of optimization.                                   .   "   ' .



 (2)  High calories gas can be produced due to  sufficient contact of the  solid
                                                              <


 with partial combustion gaa.                                            .



 (3)  Blockage trouble of the solid bed can be shouted and stable operation



 can be continued even the solid bed itself forms a blochage,  because the



 solid waste is fed from the bottom of the gasification unit and lifted up



 with a mechanical force.  .

-------
(M Since the solid waste can decompose with taking  sufficient  ti.v.e,  the



solid of a large size can be treated,  consequently pretreatmcnt of the



chage can be simplified.



(5) The operation is so stable over a wide range as  to keep little advance--



ment of gasification.  This characteristic is  quite  favorable to suit



operation schedule.



(6) Low construction cost and less friction da.aege.



  To develop the hybride retort, following research items are pointed out.



(l) A series of gasification experiment with 1 liter retort to predict a



precise material balance of the process.



(2) A. series of gasification experiment with 15 liter retort to clarify the



strength of the charge at a packed state, the permeability of thป bed,and



the characteristics of heat transfer.



(3) Development of the feed mechanism and the chamber geometory to permit



srooth up flow of thet.charge.



   The research of these items has launched to conduct in Naional Chemical



Laboratory for Indusry.  Based on the performances of these researches, the,



study will be advanced to pilot plant test.

-------

-------
.:.. : ;:•: ~-V_-:I  ;••. r^I "7-;.3 Process  for Oil Recoverv

-------
                 MUNICIPAL REFUSE FYROLY3IS

                  BY PLJII3IZ3D 3'!Q RKACTOR



The recovery of oil from municipal refuse is acceptable from

-is^r1, because the oil is storaole and there requires mild

reaction condition comparing gas production.


This development program has two major targets as follows;

  (1)  Yield of the recovered oil is 35 wt.$ to the feed by

       dry basis.

  (2)  The calorific value of the recovered oil is .8,000 kcal/kg.


This system would have the following features;

  (1;  Required heat of reaction is supplied by partial oxidation

       reaction of solid waste and air.
                        ป
  (2;  Carrier gas of fluidization consists of a part of produced

       gas and air.  This combination makes it easy to control

       reaction temnerature in the reactor.

-------
STUDY ITEM
fO f- f
•T
i ~s o T o =:
o i x a ^ y
n o <- - i— ;r
x n o rr
n o T r- x
— 0! 3 fc H-
•-• u) a> ^ o
<- 3" X ""
C 0 <~ 0
— BS.O
X - ro ~
re E ~> c
0 O H- o C -.
*^ *t 3*" rr y U) y
*-• CJ O t— r*- O cf
C i- n o 2 i-
>- X 3 0
c- o - n 3
ป- -! O O
N T O <•ป• tt
(33 ~> 3" rr
C- 0 3 -S 0 C
3 O -5 *! C.
cr .1 o r- •<•
0 r 3" rr 3
:- = a r; c
-! 3 0 *^ U
3 r— ^ *** r-'
- 0 ป-• 3
~ V = C R
r- r- C t-1
O *•• 3. ฃ1
•3 u; - r.
C- O C O 3
O ฃ• C C h^-
*•• c - *-J
>- 3 ^-' r
^ C r- n
h" <"*• — ™
O Z r-
^ • r; n
*r •*~* * —
ฃ ""i "
= 0 i
3 f-*
~

Ml-
ro ro
• • a o r
W 1- O 73 C
P O 3
con T ^
rt- P rr O
H- f- O rr ซ
t- 0 T H- t
H- t O 3
N H- 3 K
ป O O
rt- U
M- C rr O
0 "3 C-Z
3 Dซ O
o x n
o i-s c;
"> O <~
n •-ป i-
o o c
t! o z; 3
10 ra
0 < *
o o
3 T H
an x
n C. "o
o o
D Pi
C ป -5
w (t X
•-! O
O >-
U! X

03
JT
i
'"i i
r>

(ji
5 i
5
c •

H
•s.
O

(f,
M
f4

f-j
l-l
O






3
p
^

ITj
^
r

-3
7^
^*
^;
iซ

!/3
-5
^
O















7)
^
H
^
_i
*^

fff
'Si
— t
^3
__(
^
M;

•Ji
r^
C
0





SPECIFICATION OP TEST PLANT y "j
W
T
O TJ ^K^
™~ '^(''X
*c r^
^" U ^^ lvx_-X* " T
0 •• C5v nr i •ซ — rr
HI o r- — ' ~
^ CTjlS "^ pi' c •
•55 S !~T/I ' i : • o :
^- re r P | , i ' '^j
O T ^" t"^ it' ^ j "
* *~^ r4 .'ill ^ o 1
1 H i •' -9, 1
s: o •= i i i | i -

a xi is ' i ;
r - m H ^
05 2 •

M ^" (/I [1 1 ' '
*^ Si ?3 \ t J
W 1^4-^^ '

fs-> :1J ฐ
p •=! ij] , 	 , 	 ,
*^ t^3 yf™l— ' T I" f
T3 n ui p-^Tvi I
>. O O ' ' i ^) ฃ>
, o •• o | 1 ' • - ) ซ> cj
K O 03 N< 	 1— ^ I i
•• ^J ^ij I
C V. Y^\ I O
H* ^" O I ^ ' / i ^ • *
Vjt f-1 ^ iX^.^/ \ I ^5 C/i
O j^ ^IP ป'^ f*^ *^ *
ซ W i ii 1 O J3
i T! o '*~n 1 ^ ~"* —
^ >• ^" • /^ '""'"""'—ป—_ ^j , c
rj •— r^ j _,.---""t ' — -*"*.
COM =: 1 	 1 ' 	 • =
I i y . I r^"~l =
>" "
X-
<
•

' • > or
•x > o . •
c ^ w s; !
- <-) :
r o o i •
S3 >
ป r
FJ 0
CO S
cr. o o
l^T ? ' '
[t\ Ell] 	 	 g
O ij Z '•> 	 ^j i(
> P3 S | It;
2 S - LS . ;
o •• -3 ' • i ;

-1 > "0 r , . ' ,
K 0 m •—^•••-^ _i !

Z > ^ p"^ ' v' ~l -

o o : ' ) o :
v -) *-r~*^ t , ^. . <
i c: o ' S-1 • —
Sฃ ?3 >^^~*\ i • \ฃ
?O >H f i ^ ' ' ^j .
O O H ' f y rX O wT
Q I— < ^ 'N^^X Jt/)l — |
"0 W O1- C
?c* ?* ^ ' | •— •_> , i
n r ' > c UI_
X. 13 H- — 1
~ 2 r ~ c oi
1 P3 > — ] H
3 g Jl r , •
Cfl Cfi '
" >-ฃ 5 '
* :
1

-------
:or

-------
ABSTRACT
O. o ef p P- o> t-3 "1 W
^-ป -^ ^ v-ป M- I-* 43' tป S< .
Pป ?1 *ป C2 *d
0 ป•- p w •-! K T> 0 M 0 fl CJ MM
i'i:-j3w. pc-ooooi-'H B 50
J ^ t-'i 0 11. *i :.1 ^ ;! ซ•>• 0 O MM
•* i: i— i-1 o o M r. 'u iป t-* N !-.
1-' cr CT 13 Ci r+ )-• O .M O *1 r* V-* M M
it " M- o ir ซ.', ti o ct- — 1-1 o o —
M r< •* n ;> H- • r->. C r: >3
•-.' e o o fJ • a M. M. w st>
r> o o. o o !•• o o n-ci D
:' >•• o "u y g N ป
i •• -H w, ป cr o to p. pi p. t/i
- r-* ป-i o f.M 3 a • ji* (.-•
-' 0 >• Tl -O B> 15 H- P. O* !-•• O >
w r-' •< rf o o ป o >-3 a)
O C .-1 S ซ c!- M tr P* O O
•' •> O o Pป o Q. MS
.'• l— < '•-• 3' • f) H f> n
-.< O n '1 O !B c* OH- O
<. :; I-1 rt- t< iJ (J M S
" 0 H-- r* (I...* O
|J • P 0 O _ (B ซ+• !i fป
•' .-• M. ft y \-> oio
• •- P. r* H 0 rt 1 U 11
O ••; O 13 (3 O K
rt r a OHO" o
r> .-. <•!• ct- a ซ; >-^ .1- M
.ป v- rป H- rJ u/ in *-*
,., r. a. o a* J-1 r*. OH" *3
i-" U IJ  O M- s! M
r. ^ a o ซ 3 I-- ss
4 c* c* Cl
': ซป rj o tr f
•> i- <+ a tri
. •• o ซ - rv. ID
o
H U t) W
s- tv r: fe
(> N f- -C
n M [- f i
0 0 U)
! 1 >>3 i_l
H 1-1 f ~:
" Kง
.IN f <"ซ t> l-ป n* t^ CO I^l ';*
c i< !••• o o <- r-' o N i-1
O f !1 a o B M -
'J J O ซ>• -T O <•" t-l "'
U f— :>' M- :3 ti >-ป n. l*J
a c u :-• "• t-: u:
I-1- p l .' r; p. : ' r^ o t1 ^
:: iu •_• j o a i-- /,' o c; >
& s; •> p. o r ] ri- o
ij w. ^i- ,_i. .fc(, o M rj7 :.-;
" ;- o r, -, ?• f •,-> m -.-.
n • • M ,.- M r *-J t-H
i-1- f: ;.i r.- . •• .J- cr rf pj i--
o >-•• r i a or * t : . W
>J O ,O 0 'J O O ซ
• Or; . fi o c- >
•--' c •••, a r
f- M O O "• O
0 O ป*U5 O
3 (1 V- M s: -J M
O ' i* ;i O C3 tJ
i • ;i :.• a
T ij u-- no* r:
)-••!--• P- C 0 H- O
t>. P. O L!
O o* 'i O O M
•-^00 H1 3 H
fj (1 M-
o M. o :j' 3 O
pj fJ* M) fj K- lal
r: 1J :i
O 0 >-* IJ-
;; ti
• ra
' •> r '-i '• o ':,' "Ti \-
TJ TJ 'i :? -'o t'* "4
11 •-' >- !-• r> !•• cJ L-.:
M n R, M 1,1 f 'J
o' f n TJ r. i • o
i- <••• n rf'-\ !••• i-l t)
i-o on o w
••'• ri f '3 ^' - : !
^: r ' o '-• c • t-i
r- n • ) < • i - j
''. ' o :' f. .", -,j "
•-: r- u •; ,; -i i ซ o
r . i o ct -j
rin,-!* !-ปซ-ป- 'lit
!' 'l '.' "-'j 'i " ii-
f-* O O t^ >'• ^C ป-J
i-1 a o . r: -; tj 1-1
.c-3--. ฃ:1 ;VS
m ••< o !••• ".• W
'-; r> vi n t-; ra
'.1 0 M r> :>. o I'J
c: f" n u- n 11
:i o o VI
•j ;i M o"j M ;^
.•> - r o ซ -< Ivi
^ 01 IS 'J Cl l>
H- f  V ^ •ซ *5
• ปi- rr M n
rซ- ,ป 'j
P W) JO
M v. n
:i K
'.i r1
!-• l<
HLUSTRATIOK
[~2 '
^rr~*A " • ' •
• h B ..8s..
3 . rt . -•
nฐ 8 '
?. j i — ,^__ — ~1. ••
• l^IZl^ 	 , 	 J
Ln_|[ 	 ^ 	 , 	 _, 	 ij
ft- — — ^ ซ i.
o . . a r
O'. O [
2" r-1 	 ' -*1- — **Ti
, _ B a- - „. '^^J-^1
IF.LJJ • j
',. 	 	 f| i>ป 	 V
T •"• ^~L^
CT o Tj
ฐ **
•v ป-• . — ,_ , ,
ซ ซ• -O<1 - ^
S tf ' Vii 1 8 - ง/
04 0 | 0 P O1
3 0 P. 1' M <* "-1
lป c o n H-
11 0 J >J 4 S
c* ' • d
'1- r / r
g งซ , •
3 i& • ซ
t* O
0 3
^ n' " ^^n_
N^-^ r^5-
', i^, 	 >v ,i~^, 	 'I .' — , - - .r-r-s
•W-.- >••--" *--x': '. | *ii_J7f -=*>^_^- 	
'•'Vi^ 32L i
~JrC"r'-7 "1 -~=&j llL^ i o
• *' 'T — ป 	 1 ^^v — i 5'
*.ฃฃฃ* 2 S ^- — r1 j n
""^^ V
•i : 5-^/1 ^
o! '/ "
V-**
1 -^fR^-j-t-J
n^ ^ 1.



CD
-J
UJ





tr\
-j
j^



CD
-^J
cn




ro M ss ป: gi 3 ^
s~^~'ป* o ij ป o
H. as HI ti rป t-1-
a o KJ •* o P ,
H TJ p HI & rr K. H- i
M rt- >.. 0 ป 0 'It 3
ri fit o ซ
O ^ l'- t* O fJ '-" O
3 u ii c a o' •-ป
o P o H oป o >(
PJ O O t* O t-l \7
•3 if ft t*
a" o o o o 'a D o
>j- n f J - 01
:i u u :•/ o o * ^
O O ป'• " H- P-
!••• O O 5> O rl- ซ-1
a v t> n - tr
a 'i s c: ?• i*
Ho ซ.; p -d n
fj r. o' M o <<
H- c o ซ"• !s •d M ป*•
V- 0 0 O '-', Ci 0 tO
o o o E< c* >l ij ^
;i o. HJ :r o •< 4 ;i
• O fJ O •-' rl • f J \ '*
ci r> 'l " ' : p'- o <<
p :i n ri <* o c>
11 C -• )•'• H- < O
p. o r> '•> c. n
0 1 ' l*
fj ti ^ r. i: vi
{t -o! o c >'. r- ".
M f r.. -i rj w
 ซ+ r ' i i-1 iซ
o t-'i o r: '•-, o
tr jj >i i J c. !• ' .-.- c.^
M- :> c! t*. :ซ'
ci o >* -y n • n a
•,:• f> '.-•• <•">• f. V l;
o W U i •• : •• tl p.
>•) O H* tl U W
• ซ<• t-> o H n •! c-j
p. rj c' fJ ;'• O
r; ij o 0* o w, ••;
0:1 o rv o h-1 1-1
M- n- P. o ป'• r; u..
ซ* o o n 'i i * M- >•!
o < • n>-
•Cl 0 '.1 0 I'- tl
r* •> >-•>< r* :i ";
l>- O O (T! o 0 tC
O O '3 ซ+ • I • Vj
o o o t:
ll> ri tu :1 t-'j c.' :
r-i n • 'l o> ••
o - ซ o r .
c* !!• J tl
ซ o
rt- a H T (1
LJ- ii o ;> <•;
P H- [•>
ซ•!• ": rt ซ'
r- r-- 0
r> C! '< :1
fV I-.-
0 f" 0
V^ O
XJ 11 1-'
>-t u- '.'.
o IJ
I-1 30
'*S o n
ti- t" !•••
f- V'- O
p X
•Ji O
'1 or:
O 1 '• O
o '( :>
'.- •.: o
n fj '.i
P
M. H- r..
ซ tl f<
o
:i
o cr
ป* o
cf
t
•

-------
                             XVI
  SECOND U.S.-JAPAN CONFERENCE ON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
          Washington, D.C.    September 25, 1974
                       COMMUNIQUE


     The Second U.S.-Japan Conference on Solid Waste

Management was held in Washington, D.C. September 24 and

25, 1974.

     The Japanese delegation, headed by Mr. Tsutomu

Fukuda, Director, Waterworks and Environmental Department,

Environmental Sanitation Bureau, Ministry of Health and

Welfare, was composed of four national government officials

and one local government official.

     The U.S. delegation, headed by Mr. H. Lanier Hickman,

Director of Operations, Office of Solid Waste Management

Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was composed

of five EPA officials and one representative each from the

American Public Works Association and the National Solid

Waste Management Association.  Mr. Fitzhugh Green, Associate

Administrator for International Activities, EPA; Mr. Roger

Strelow, Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste

Management, EPA; and Mr. Arsen Darnay, Deputy Assistant

Administrator for Solid Waste Management Programs greeted

the Japanese delegation and delivered opening remarks of

welcome.

     In addition to the conference in Washington, the

-------
                          - 2 -






Japanese delegation visited various sites demonstrating



EPA's solid waste programs in Baltimore, Maryland; St.



Louis, Missouri; Memphis, Tennessee; Orlando, Florida;



Atlanta, Georgia; and San Francisco, California.



     The U.S.-Japanese Conference on Solid Waste Management



grew out of the Second U.S.-Japanese Ministerial Conference



on Environmental Pollution held in Washington, B.C. in June



1971 between then Chairman of the Council on Environmental



Quality Russell Train, and Japanese Minister Sadanori



Yamanaka.  The First Conference on Solid Waste Management



was held in Tokoyo in 1973.



     During the Conference, the two delegations presented



papers and exchanged information on various aspects of the



solid waste problems confronting each country.  Principal



topics were collection and transportation of wastes,



disposal of wastes, hazardous waste management, and



resource recovery.  The discussions were vigorous and



both sides agreed that the exchange was very useful.



     In order to expand U.S.-Japan cooperation on problems



of solid waste management, the two delegations agreed to



begin to focus on technical areas of solid waste management



which could lead to future joint projects which could result



in improved solid waste management and environmental



protection.  Study areas which will receive greater



attention during the next 18 months include:



     1.  Pyrolysis of solid waste.

-------
                          - 3 -





     2.  Environmental effects of vinyl chloride and PVC.



     3.  Improved collection systems management and



         technology.



     4.  Environmental effects of improper disposal of solid



         waste on the land.



     5.  Hazardous waste treatment and disposal



         technology.



     6.  Recovery of post-consumer solid waste.



     Technical staff of the two governments will begin



detailed discussions and communications in the selected



study areas as the first step in identifying specific



efforts which can benefit the cooperating countries.



Each country will identify specific technical experts to



begin such efforts under the guidance of the project leaders



	 of the Japanese government and



H. Lanier Hickman, Jr. of the U.S. EPA's Office of Solid



Waste Management Programs.

-------
         OPA  (A-107)
        UNITED STATES
'ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
      WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
       OFFICIAL BUSINESS
    PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE S300
   AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
     POSTAGE AND FEES PAID
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          EPA-339
                                    XVII
                                                        News
                                         Sibbison (202)  755-0344

        FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FRIDAY,  SEPTEMBER 27,  1974

        U.S.,  JAPAN ANNOUNCE SOLID WASTE AGREEMENT

            U.S.  and Japanese government officials  announced agree-

        ment today on a plan which could lead to future joint projects

        concerning solid waste management, resource  recovery and

        environmental protection.

            The announcement followed the Second U.S. Japan Con-
        ference on Solid Waste Management which was  held at Environ-
        mental Protection Agency headquarters in Washington, D.C.
        September 24-25.

            Experts in solid waste management from the two countries
        will begin detailed communications in a number of study
        areas  as the first step in identifying cooperative activites
        which  can benefit the United States and Japan, the announce-
        ment said.

             The study areas which will receive attention during the
        coming months include:

             Pyrolysis of solid .waste.  This is the use of.solid-
        waste  as energy through a process invo.lving the physical and
        chemical decomposition.of organic matter by the action.of
        heat in an oxygen deficient atmosphere.

             Environmental effects of vinyl chloride and polyvinyl
        chloride; improved collection systems management and

                                   . (more)
   Return this sheet if you do NOT wish to receive this material Q, or if change of address Is needed O' (indicate change, including zip code).
   EPA FORM J510-1 (REV. B-72)       '    '    •

-------
                             —2 —


technology; environmental effects of improper disposal of
solid waste on the land; hazardous waste treatment and dis-
posal technology;  recovery of post consumer solid waste;
and management information systems in industrial wastes.

     The Japanese and U.S. delegates decided that a third
conference will be held in Japan in late 1975 or early 1976.

     The Japanese delegation was headed by Tsutomu Fukuda,
Director, Waterworks and Environment Department, Environ-
mental Sanitation Bureau, Ministry of Health and Welfare.

     The other delegates from the national Japanese govern-
ment were:  Tadayuki Morishita, Deputy Chief, Industrial
Waste Management Office, Ministry of Health and Welfare;
Michio Nakajiku, Research and Development Office, Agency of
Industrial Science and Technology, Ministry of International
Trade and Industry; Mitsuo Nakano, Head, Road Division,
City Bureau, Ministry of Construction.

     The fifth member of the delegation was Takashi
Miyanohara, Sanitation Bureau, Yokohama City.

     The U.S. delegation, headed by H. Lanier Hickman,
Director of Operations, Office of Solid Waste Management
Programs, EPA, was composed of five EPA officials and one
representative each from the American Public Works Associa-
tion and the National Solid Waste Management Association.

     Fitzhugh Green, Associate Administrator, EPA; Roger Strelow
Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste Management, EPA; and
Arsen Darnay, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste
Management Programs, EPA; greeted the Japanese delegation and
delivered opening remarks of welcome.
                            I f #
•yal.117

-------