-oJatr^l
v-xEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                          Industrial Environmental Research  EPA-600 280-152
                          Laboratory          July 1980
                          Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
Feasibility of Primary
Copper Smelter
Weak Sulfur Dioxide
Stream Control

-------
                RESEARCH  REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U S  Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series  These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of  traditional grouping was  consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are

      1   Environmental Health Effects Research
      2   Environmental Protection Technology
      3   Ecological Research
      4,  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6   Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7   Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8   "Special" Reports
      9   Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECH-
NOLOGY series This series describes research performed to develop and dem-
onstrate instrumentation, equipment, and methodology to repair or prevent en-
vironmental degradation from point and non-point sources of pollution. This work
provides the new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution-sources to  meet environmental quality standards
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                             EPA-600/2-80-152
                                             July  1980
    FEASIBILITY OF PRIMARY COPPER SMELTER
      WEAK SULFUR DIOXIDE  STREAM CONTROL
                      by

               I.J.  Weisenberg
                  T. Archer
                 F.M. Winkler
                 T.J. Browder
                  A. Prem
    Pacific Environmental  Services,  Inc.
       Santa Monica, California 90404
           Contract No.  68-03-2398
               Project Officer

               John 0. BurckTe
   Industrial  Pollution Control  Division
Industrial  Environmental Research  Laboratory
           Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
     U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

-------
                                DISCLAIMER

     This report has been reviewed by the Industrial  Environmental Research
Laboratory, Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.

-------
                                  FOREWORD
     When energy and material resources are extracted, processed, converted,
and used, the related pollutional impacts on our environment and even on our
health often require that new and increasingly more efficient pollution
control methods be used.  The Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory -
Cincinnati (lERL-Ci) assists in developing and demonstrating new and improved
methodologies that will meet these needs both efficiently and economically.

     The primary nonferrous metals industry is the second largest stationary
source category of S02 emissions, after fuel combustion in utility and indus-
trial boilers.  Uncontrolled S02 emissions from primary copper smelting are
approximately equivalent to the quantity that would be generated by eight to
nine 1000 megawatt power plants using 4% sulfur coal.

     In current domestic practice, strong sulfur dioxide gas streams are
controlled by metallurgical acid plants at all except two smelters where
they are uncontrolled.  The weak sulfur dioxide streams, i.e., those not
amenable to processing in the acid plants, are currently uncontrolled for
lack of applicable control technology.  This report explores the technical
feasibility of a number of approaches either under development or employed
at full scale in smelters abroad.
                                              David G.  Stephan
                                                  Director
                                Industrial  Environmental  Research Laboratory
                                                 Cincinnati
                                     i n

-------
                                  PREFACE

     Weak SOp streams from copper smelters are generated from multihearth
roasters and reverberatory furnaces.   New copper smelters would only emit
weak SOp streams from reverberatory furnaces.   The objective of this report
is to present all possible ways, procedures and systems available for S0?
control.
     Contractually a task report is required for each of the four major
tasks:  (1) Operating Conditions Determination; (2) Processing Technique
Modification; (3) Oxygen Enrichment; and (4) Concentration and Neutral-
ization Systems.  These have been combined in this volume.  Detailed
analyses and supporting data have been included in an extensive appendix.
     This report was submitted in fulfillment of EPA Contract 68-03-2398
by Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. under the sponsorship of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial Environmental Research Lab-
oratory, Industrial Pollution Control Division, Metals and Inorganic
Chemicals Branch, Cincinnati, Ohio.

-------
                              ABSTRACT

     The major source of uncontrolled emissions of SCL from primary
smelters in the United States is the reverberatory furnace.  Approximately
22 percent of the sulfur input to copper smelters is emitted from the
reverberatory furnace.  Average emissions of SCL range from 0.4 percent
to 1.5 percent by volume which is too low for processing in a sulfuric
acid plant, the accepted control approach in this industry.  The primary
objective of this study is to identify systems and techniques that
experience indicates, either singly or in combination, can be used to
control weak SCL emissions from copper smelter reverberatory furnaces.
In some cases, multihearth roasters also generate weak SCL streams
and their control is a secondary objective of the study.
     There are two overall approaches to the control of weak SCL stream
emissions.  These are to (1) increase the concentration of SCL to a
range where it is feasible to produce sulfuric acid or other useable
by-products, or (2) neutralize the effluent as a waste product.
Approaches to weak SCL stream control such as processing modifications,
oxygen enrichment, and the use of concentration or neutralization systems
have been reviewed to identify those having sufficient full-scale or
plant size use to qualify them as representing available technology.
Detailed composition of reverberatory furnace emissions and operating
characteristics were determined to provide a basis for the control
approach evaluation.
     Construction, operation, and maintenance of the reverberatory
furnace can play a major part in the concentration of SCL in the offgases.
With operating techniques such as sealing of all cracks and openings,
close control of internal pressure, reduction of excess burner air and
oxygen enrichment, increases in average S02 content of 1 percent can be
achieved (i.e., from an average of 1.5 to 2.5 percent S02).  While this

-------
is still not sufficient to allow direct processing in a conventional
sulfuric acid plant, it is a sufficient increase over conventional practice
to provide significant reduction in subsequent size and complexity of
retrofit concentration or neutralization systems.  Recent experience by a
smelter in Chile has indicated that average S02 concentration from a
green charge reverberatory furnace can be increased to as high as 5 percent
using oxygen enrichment.
    Considerable experience has been accumulated in Japan on the lime/lime-
stone gypsum neutralization system using green charge reverberatory furnace
offgases.  Full-scale plant size experience has also been obtained there
on the magnesium oxide regenerative system processing green charge reverbera-
tory furnace offgases.  These two systems confirm that control of the
copper smelter reverberatory furnace is available as current state-of-
the-art. Additional concentration systems that have been operated at
plant-scale are the ammonia system used for several years at a copper-
lead smelter and a coal reduction process with sulfur as the product.
The modified cold water concentration system has been successfully applied
at full-scale, and pilot plant experience, with smelter gases indicates
this system can operate at concentrations from 0.5 to 5 percent S02 using
citrate as the buffering agent.

     An alternate approach modifying a conventional  sulfuric acid plant
has been reviewed to indicate that even with the low S02 concentration
currently being emitted from U.S.  reverberatory furnaces, it is possible
to process this gas directly to produce sulfuric acid.   This can be done
with a minimum of energy expenditure by a proposed technique even though
actual full-scale experience was obtained using the high energy approach.
     A study of the uses or disposal of control system products was con-
ducted as an aid to evaluation.  The neutralization system with the most
disposable product is one that produces gypsum.  While it may not be
possible for this product to be sold in the U.S., its disposal by landfill
or settling pond does not introduce any additional pollution problems.  A
review of the sulfuric acid market indicates that this market will be
supplied by utilities and refinery by-product acid as well, thereby main-
taining a very competitive situation.  However, the smelters can price their
                                    vi

-------
acid down to a cost considering shipping equivalent to that for neutrali-
zation on-site.  Reduction of the sulfur dioxide to sulfur would provide
a readily storable product; however, the complexity of providing a reduc-
ing agent tends to inhibit this approach.  Coal  is the most logical
reducing agent which could be used either directly or indirectly as  a
source of reducing gas with the consequent complexity of an additional
system.
     While each individual smelter with a reverberatory furnace or
multihearth roaster must consider the various techniques available to
determine the best local approach, it is clear that existing techniques
either singly or in combination can be used to control copper smelter
reverberatory furnace S09 emissions.
                                  vn

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS


Section

      DISCLAIMER	   i i

      FOREWORD.	  i i i

      PREFACE	   i v

      ABSTRACT	    v

      FIGURES	  xvi

      TABLES	  xix

      ACKNOWLEDGEMENT	   xx

   1   SUMMARY	    1

   2   CONVENTIONAL COPPER SMELTING AND S02 CONTROL SYSTEMS...    9

      2.1   General	    9
      2.2   Roasting	   10

           2.2.1   Process	   10
           2.2.2  Multihearth Roasters	   10
           2.2.3  Fluid-Bed Roasters	   11

      2.3   Reverberatory Furnace	   13

           2.3.1   Requirement for Control	   13
           2.3.2  Design	   13
           2.3.3  Factors Affecting S02 Emissions From
                  Reverberatory Furnaces	   16

                  2.3.3.1  Chemistry of Reverberatory Furnace
                           Smel ting	   16
                  2.3.3.2  Weak Sulfur Dioxide Evolution and
                           Influencing Factors	   20
                  2.3.3.3  Charge Composition Variation	   22
                  2.3.3.4  Method of Charging	   26
                  2.3.3.5  Converter Slag  Return	   28
                  2.3.3.6  Charge Bank Sloughing	   29
                  2.3.3.7  Furnace Firing  Conditions	   30

                                ix

-------
Section
                 "2.3.3.8   Reduced Operation Effects	    33
                  2.3.3.9   Fuel Supplied Sulfur	    33
                  2.3.3.10  Sulfur Dioxide Stratification	    34

           2.3.4  Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Reverber-
                  atory Furnace Practice	    35

      2.4  Converting	    39
      2.5  Conventional Sulfuric Acid Plant Practice	    40

           2.5.1  Sulfuric Acid Plant Technology	    40

                  2.5.1.1   System	    40
                  2.5.1.2   Condition of S02 Gas	    40
                  2.5.1.3   Conversion of S02 to S03	    43
                  2.5.1.4   Acid Plant Design Considerations..    46

   3  PROCESSING TECHNIQUE MODIFICATIONS	    48

      3.1  General	    48
      3.2  Elimination of Converter Slag Return	    49
      3.3  Sealing Leakage Points	    51
      3.4  Pressure Control	    54
      3.5  Preheated Air	    55
      3.6  Preliminary Processing Using Fluid-Bed Roasters	    56
      3.7  Operation at Lower Air-to-Fuel Ratio	    59
      3.8  Instrumental Control of Reverberatory Smelting	    61
      3.9  Oxygen Enrichment	    62

           3.9.1  Introduction	    62
           3.9.2  Oxygen Utilization in a Reverberatory
                  Furnace	    63
           3.9.3  Method of Oxygen Introduction to the Furnace   69
           3.9.4  Experience with Oxygen-Enrichment	    71
           3.9.5  Comparison of Various Studies in the
                  Literature	    78
           3.9.6  Relationship Between Oxygen-Enrichment and
                  S02 Concentration in the Flue Gas System	    79
           3.9.7  Advantages of Using Oxygen-Enrichment in
                  Reverberatory Furnace	    81
           3.9.8  Refractory Wear With Oxygen Usage	    83
           3.9.9  Conclusion	    87

      3.10 Predrying Wet Charge	    88
      3.11 Continuous Furnace Charging	    90
      3.12 Elimination of the Reverberatory Furnace	    90
      3.13 Converter Scheduling and Hooding	    91
      3.14 Blending	    92

-------
Sectioni

   4  DIRECT ACID PLANT PROCESSING	    94

      4.1  Introduction	    94
      4.2  Metallurgical  Acid Plant Design	    96
      4.3  Onahama Smel ter Experi ence	    98
      4.4  Reduced Energy System	   100
      4.5  Alternate Approach to Control  Water Balance	   110

   5  FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) SYSTEMS	   113

      5.1  General	   113
      5.2  Lime/Limestone SOg Control System for Reverberatory
           Furnace Offgases at the Onahama Copper Smelter	   115

           5.2.1   Introduction	   115
           5.2.2   Onahama Reverberatory Furnace Feed	   117
           5.2.3   Lime/Limestone Gypsum Flow System	   117
           5.2.4   Design  and Operating Conditions at the
                  Onahama Smel ter	   119

                  5.2.4.1  Input Material  and Preparation	   119
                  5.2.4.2  Internal  Operating Conditions	   124
                  5.2.4.3  Output Conditions and Materials	   126
                  5.2.4.4  System Cleaning	   132
                  5.2.4.5  Plant Area	   132
                  5.2.4.6  Operating Personnel	   134

           5.2.5   Application of the Onahama Lime/Limestone
                  Scrubbing System to U.S. Smelters	   134

      5.3  Duval  Sierrita Lime Scrubber S0? Control System....   138

           5.3.1   Introduction	   138
           5.3.2   System  Description	   138
           5.3.3   Input Conditions	   140
           5.3.4   Internal Processing	   140
           5.3.5   System Operation	   143
           5.3.6   Application of Duval Lime Scrubbing System
                  to Reverberatory Furnaces	   144

      5.4  Magnesium Oxide S02 Concentration System for
           Reverberatory  Furnace Offgases  at the Onahama
           Copper Smel ter	   144

           5.4.1   History	   144
           5.4.2   Magnesium Oxide System Description	   145
           5.4.3   Operating Conditions	   148

                  5.4.3.1  Input Material  and Preparation	   148
                  5.4.3.2  Internal  Operating Conditions	   149

                                xi

-------
Section
                  5.4.3.3  Output	   149
                  5.4.3.4  Maintenance and Operation	   150
                  5.4.3.5  Area Required	   150

           5.4.4  Application of the Magnesium Oxide S0£
                  Control System to U.S. Smelters	   150

      5.5  Citrate Processes	   153

           5.5.1  General	   153
           5.5.2  Bureau of Mines Citrate Processes	   154

                  5.5.2.1  Introduction and History	   154
                  5.5.2.2  Process Description	   156
                  5.5.2.3  Problems With the Process	   158

           5.5.3  Flakt-Boliden Citrate Process	   159

                  5.5.3.1  Introduction and History	   159
                  5.5.3.2  Process Description	   161
                  5.5.3.3  Example of Green and Calcine Charge
                           Reverberatory Furnace SOo Control
                           Systems	   167

           5.5.4  Application of Citrate Process to Copper
                  Smelter Reverberatory Furnace S02 Control...   171

      5.6  Cominco Ammonia Scrubbing System	   171

           5.6.1  General	   171
           5.6.2  Process Description	   173
           5.6.3  The Application of the Cominco Ammonia
                  Process to Control Copper Reverberatory
                  Furnace Offgas	   176

      5.7  Wellman-Lord Process	   177

           5.7.1  General	   177
           5.7.2  Process Description	   178
           5.7.3  Application of the Wellman-Lord System for
                  Reverberatory Furnace SOp Control	   181

      5.8  Coal Reduction	   183

           5.8.1  General	   183
           5.8.2  Cominco Coal Reduction System	   186

      5.9  Comparison of Primary Copper Reverberatory Furnace
           and Power Plant Emission Characteristics	   188
                               XII

-------
Section

           5.9.1   Introduction and Summary	  188
           5.9.2   Gas Comparison	  188
           5.9.3   Dust Comparison	  190

     5.10  Application of FGD Systems to Reverberatory Furnace
           Of fgases	  192

           5.10.1   Control  of Gas Volume Flow Rate and S02
                   Concentrati on	  192
           5.10.2   Blending - Sulfuric Acid Plant	  195
           5.10.3   Lime/Limestone Gypsum Systems	  196
           5.10.4   Magnesium Oxide System	  197
           5.10.5   Citrate  System	  197
           5.10.6   Ammonia  System	  198
           5.10.7   WeiIman-Lord System	  198
           5.10.8   Coal Reduction	  199

     5.11  S02 Control System Product Processing and Disposal.  200

           5.11.1   Introduction and Summary	  200
           5.11.2   Gypsum	  201
           5.11.3   Sulfur/Sulfuric Acid	  203

                   5.11.3.1  Overview	  203
                   5.11.3.2  Smelter Sulfur/Sulfuric Acid
                             Market	  207
                   5.11.3.3  TVA Market Study	  214

           5.11.4   Liquid S02	  218
           5.11.5   Acid Neutralization	  219

                   5.11.5.1  General	  219
                   5.11.5.2  Dry Process	  221
                   5.11.5.3  Wet Process	  223
                   5.11.5.4  Cost Considerations	  223

     5.12  Summary	  225

  6  APPLICATION  TO NEW SMELTERS	  230

     6.1  Plant Emission Desulfurization Scenarios	  230

          6.1.1  Introduction	  230
          6.1.2  Background Assumptions	  230
          6.1.3  Blending Scenarios for Reverberatory Furnace
                 S02 Control	  240
          6.1.4  Other Blending Considerations	  250
                               XI 11

-------
Section

   7  APPLICATION TO EXISTING SMELTERS	   263

      7.1   General	   263
      7.2  Processing Technique Modifications	   264
      7.3  Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems	   265
      7.4  Blending	,	   267
      7.5  Economics	   267

   8  CONCLUSIONS	   268

      REFERENCES	   270

      APPENDICES

        A  MULTIHEARTH AND FLUID-BED ROASTERS	   279
        B  REVERBERATORY FURNACE HISTORY,  DESIGN AND OPERATION.   299
        C  CONTINUOUS SIDE WALL CHARGING	   319
        D  RECOVERY OF COPPER CONVERTER SLAGS BY FLOTATION	   326
        E  ONAHAMA SMELTER REVERBERATORY FURNACE FLUE GAS
           CALCULATIONS	   328
        F  JAPANESE REVERBERATORY FURNACE PRACTICE AFFECTING
           S02 EMISSIONS	   330
        G  NAOSHIMA COPPER SMELTER	   339
        H  CONVERTER PROGRAMMING	   349
        I  CONVERTER SLAG RETURN:  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES   362
        J  OXYGEN ENRICHMENT EXPERIENCE AT THE CALETONES
           SMELTER	   365
      K-l  PROCESS DESIGN FOR DIRECT PROCESSING OF REVERBER-
           ATORY FURNACE GASES	   367
        L  LIME/LIMESTONE GYPSUM S02 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR
           REVERBERATORY FURNACE OFFGASES AT THE ONAHAMA
           COPPER SMELTER	   402
        M  COMPONENTS INCLUDED IN THE ONAHAMA LIME/LIMESTONE
           GYPSUM CONTROL SYSTEM	   406
        N  WATER BALANCE GYPSUM SYSTEM	   411
        0  MAGNESIUM OXIDE SYSTEM COMPONENT AND COST
           CONSIDERATIONS	   415
        P  CHEMISTRY INVOLVED IN MAGNESIUM OXIDE SYSTEM	   416
        Q  WATER BALANCE IN THE MgO SYSTEM	   418
        R  PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR THE CITRATE PROCESS	   422
        S  PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR FLAKT CITRATE PROCESS	   423
        T  PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMINCO AMMONIA S02
           CONTROL SYSTEM	   424
        U  PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR WELLMAN-LORD SYSTEM	   425
        V  RECOVERY OF SULFUR FROM SMELTER GASES BY THE ORKLA
           PROCESS AT RIO TINTO	   426
        W  FW-BF DRY ADSORPTION SYSTEM	   441
        X  SULFUR/SULFURIC ACID PRESENT AND FUTURE USES AND
           MARKETS	   450
                               xiv

-------
Section

      APPENDICES
       Y-l BACKGROUND MATERIAL, ASSUMPTIONS, AND	  483
       Y-2 CALCULATED GAS CHARACTERISTICS FOR ONE CONVERTER
           CYCLE (11 HOURS) FOR SCENARIOS HANDLING RF OFFGASES
           IN A FGD SYSTEM	  488
       Y-3 ASSUMPTIONS FOR BLENDING SCENARIOS	  505
       Y-4 SPECIFIC ASSUMPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL BLENDING
           SCENARIOS	  508
       Z   SULFURIC ACID PLANT COST ANALYSIS	  510
           REFERENCES TO APPENDICES	  513
                                 xv

-------
                          LIST OF FIGURES
Figure

 2-1     Typical  Fluid-Bed Roaster	      12
 2-2     Side-Charging Calcine by Drag Chains	      15
 2-3     Equilibrium Diagram Cu2S-FeS	      17
 2-4     S02 Emissions Versus Time From Three Different
        Reverberatory Furnaces	      21
 2-5     Percent S02 Emissions Versus Time From Onahama
        Reverberatory Furnace	.	      23
 2-6     Schematic of Onahama Reverberatory Furnace
        Gas System	      32
 2-7     Sampling Stations and Points No.  1 Reverberatory
        Furnace	      35
 2-8     Single and Double Contact Sulfuric Acid Plant
        Schematic	      41
 3-1     Pressure Variation Along Centerline of the Reverbera-
        tory Furnace at Onahama Smel ter	      55
 3-2     Thermal  Absorption Along the Length of the Reverbera-
        tory Furnace for Normal Operation Conditions, Increased
        Fuel Rate, and Oxygen Enrichment	      65
 3-3     Methods of Oxygen Addition	      70
 3-4     Variation in Specific Fusion with Oxygen Content of a
        Blast and its Growth Per 1 Percent of Oxygen Addition
        to Blast	      73
 3-5     Sulfur Dioxide Content in Waste Gases from the
        Reverberatory Furnace as a Function of the Oxygen....      73
 3-6     Dependence of the Specific Fusion of the Charge on
        the Fuel Rate at Various 02 Content in the Blast in
        Reverberatory Furnace	      73
 3-7     Reverberatory Furnace Temperatures in the Vicinity
        of the Furnace Roofs With and Without Oxygen-Enrich-
        ment at Inco Smel ter	      85
 3-8    Reverberatory Production and Flue Gas Dependence Upon
        Tonnage Oxygen and Fuel	      89
 4-1     Flowsheet of Remodeled Acid Plant	      99
 4-2    Simplified Flowsheet of Reverberatory Gas
        Sulfuric Acid Plant  - Onahama Process - Class 1	     101
 4-3    Simplified Flowsheet of Reverberatory Gas
        Sulfuric Acid Plant  - Browder Process - Class II	     102
 4-4    Hot Heat Exchanger	     105
 5-1     Lime/Limestone to Gypsum Pilot Plant	     116
 5-2    Flowsheet Onahama Lime/Limestone to Gypsum System....     118
                                xvi

-------
                    LIST OF FIGURES (continued)
5-3    Onahama Reverberatory Furnace Offgas S02
       Concentration Versus Time	      120
5-4    Onahama Lime/Limestone Gypsum System Offgas S02
       Concentration (Full Range 1,000 ppm)	      127
5-5    Crystal Comparison	      128
5-6    Schematic of Onahama Wastewater Treatment Plant	      131
5-7    Arsenic Precipitation Conditions	      133
5-8    Duval Sierrita Roasting-Scrubbing Flowsheet	      139
5-9    The pH Versus Calcium Hydroxide Concentration	      142
5-10   Flowsheet for MgO System at Onahama Smelter	      146
5-11   Flow Diagram for the Bureau of Mines Citrate Process.      157
5-12   The S02 - I Plant at the Ronnskar Smelter, Sweden
       Operating Since 1970	      160
5-13   The S02 - II Plant at the Ronnskar, Sweden, Smelter
       Operating Since late 1976	      160
5-14   Flow Diagram for the Flakt-Boliden Citrate Process...      162
5-15   Flakt-Boliden Pilot Plant at Ronnskar Smelter,
       Sweden	      166
5-16   Calcine Charge Reverberatory Furnace Offgas
       Flakt Citrate S02 Control System	      168
5-17   Green Charge Reverberatory Furnace Offgas Flakt
       Citrate S02 Control System	      169
5-18   Flow Diagram Cominco Ammonia Scrubbing Process	      174
5-19   Flow Diagram For Wellman-Lord Process	      179
5-20   Sulfuric Acid Neutralization - Dry Process	      222
5-21   Sulfuric Acid Neutralization - Wet Process	      224
6-1    Reverberatory Furnace Offgas Characteristics	      234
6-2    Converter Offgas Characteristics 	      236
6-3    Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases	      241
6-4    Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases
       Using Oxygen Enrichment	      241
6-5    Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases
       Using Nonregenerative FGD Systems	      242
6-6    Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases  Using
       Oxygen Enrichment and Nonregenerative FGD Systems....      242
6-7    Flowsheet for Blending Schemes Using Regenerative
       FGD Systems	      243
6-8    Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases
       Using Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD
       Systems	      243
6-9    Flowsheet for Handling Copper Smelter S02 Offgases
       Dictated by the New Source Performance Standards	      244
6-10   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes Using Regenerative
       FGD Systems	      251
6-11   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases  Using
       Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD Systems	      251
                               xvii

-------
                    LIST OF FIGURES (concluded)
Figure
 6-12   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes  Using Regenerative
        FGD Systems	      252
 6-13   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases
        Using Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD Systems.      252
 6-14   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes  Using Regenerative
        FGD Systems	      253
 6-15   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases Using
        Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD Systems	      254
 6-16   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes  Using Regenerative
        FGD Systems	      254
 6-17   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases
        Using Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD
        Systems	      254
 6-18   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes  Using Regenerative
        FGD Systems	      255
 6-19   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter Offgases Using
        Oxygen Enrichment and Regenerative FGD Systems	      256
                               xvm

-------
                         LIST OF TABLES


Table

 3-1    Inco's Data on Oxygen Enrichment in a Reverberatory
        Furnace	   71
 3-2    General Specifications of the Oxygen-Oil Burner at
        Onahama Smelter	   75
 3-3    Reverberatory Furnace Data at Onahama Smelter Before
        and After the Use of Oxy-Fuel Burners in the Furnace..   76
 3-4    Smirnov's Computations Showing the Effect of Oxygen-
        Enrichment of Air on Fuel Consumption	   77
 3-5    Reverberatory Smelting Process Characteristics at
        Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Combine	   78
 3-6    Linde's and Kupryakov's Experimental and Theoretical
        Data Showing the Dependence of SO;? Concentration In
        Reverberatory Flue Gas on Oxygen in Blast	   80
 3-7    Measured Furnace Temperatures Produced by Oxygen
        Enriched Air at Inco Smelter	   85
 5-1    Flakt-Boliden Process - Technical Data Summary	  170
 5-2    Operating Data of MHI FGD Systems	  189
 5-3    Gas Characteristics Comparison	  191
 5-4    Particulate Out of Reverberatory Furnace and
        Power PI ant	  193
 5-5    Analyses of Some Dusts	  194
 5-6    Commercial Strengths of Sulfuric Acid (60°F)	  204
 5-7    Sulfuric Acid Near Term Capacity Present Production
        and Ultimate Capacity of U.S. Nonferrous Smelters	  209
 5-8    Wet and Dry ^(ty Limestone Neutralization
        Process Evaluation Summary	  226
 6-1    Reverberatory Off gas Volume and S02 Profiles	  234
 6-2    Converter Offgas Vol ume and SOe Profi 1 es	  237
 6-3    Basis:  Blending Schemes	  239
 6-4    Blending Scenarios for Controlling S02 Emissions from
        a New Copper Smelter Processing 1,400 TPD - Concentrate
        Reverberatory Furnace Gases (Only) to FGD Systems	  245
 6-5    Blending Scenarios for Controlling S02 Emissions from
        a New Green Charge Copper Smelting Facility	  249
 6-6    Additional Blending Scenarios for  ontrolling S0£
        Emissions From a New Copper Smelter Processing 1,400
        TPD - Concentrate Considering Combinations of All
        Smelting Equipment Offgases	  256
 6-7    Oxygen to Sulfur Dioxide (02/S02) Ratio for Additional
        Scenarios as Presented in Table 6-5	  260
                               xix

-------
                          ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     The authors wish to express their appreciation and thanks to the
Mitsubishi Metals Corporation and their personnel in Tokyo, at the
Onahama and Naoshima smelters, and at the Hiroshima Technical  Institute
for providing extensive information on their SCL control experience.
     The preparation of Appendix C, Continuous Side Wall Charging and
Green Field Smelter Parameters for the Blending Studies was provided
by Jan H. Reimers and Associates, Limited of Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
     Mr. Tim J. Browder of the Tim J. Browder Company developed the
analysis and process for direct sulfuric acid plant processing of weak
SO  streams from reverberatory furnaces presented in Section 4.4 and
Appendix K, Process Design For Direct Processing of Reverberatory Gases.
     Mr. Fred M. Winkler, Consultant provided detailed information on
reverberatory furnace practice and prepared a major portion of Appendix
B based upon his extensive operating and management experience with
this equipment.
     The authors also wish to thank the many members of the industry
who gave of their time to take part in discussions and provide comments
on the varied subjects in this report.
                                 xx

-------
                             SECTION 1
                              SUMMARY

     Most of the primary copper ores in the world are obtained  from
sulfides.  The vast majority of the extraction techniques that  are
used involve pyrometallurgy, usually starting with copper concen-
trates.  Since the primary objective is to separate the copper  from
the sulfur containing materials, large quantities of sulfur dioxide
(S02) are generated in all copper smelters.
     The typical or conventional copper smelter processes the con-
centrates with suitable fluxes initially in a roaster, followed by a
reverberatory furnace, and then a converter.  The roaster removes
the easily removable atom of sulfur to adjust the copper to sulfur
ratio for further processing in the reverberatory furnace which
produces a material  called matte.  The matte generally contains
approximately 40 percent copper.  The matte is then further refined
in a converter which first reduces and then oxidizes it to produce
approximately 99 percent blister copper.  The blister copper is then
fire refined, cast into anodes and finally electrolytically refined
to meet extreme purity requirements.
     The three major pyrometallurgical steps generate considerable
quantities of sulfur dioxide sufficient to classify smelters as the
second largest SOg emission source in the U.S.  Multihearth roast-
ers will usually generate gases containing approximately 4 percent
S0£, although older units, which may contain considerable leaks,
can generate gases as low as 2 percent.  Fluid-bed roasters will
produce an 8 percent average S02 concentration.  Sulfur dioxide
offgas streams from fluid-bed roasters tend to be sufficiently  high
in concentration to process in a sulfuric acid plant.  Current
                                1

-------
multihearth roaster S02 offgas streams are usually too low in S02
concentration for effective acid plant processing.
     The major source of uncontrolled emissions of SO/> from pri-
mary copper smelters in the United States is the  reverberatory
furnace.  Sulfur dioxide emitted from the reverberatory furnace
averages 22 percent (by weight) of the total sulfur entering the
smelter, but can be as high as 34 percent for green charge or as low
as 9 percent for calcine charge produced with a fluid-bed roaster.
Average emissions of SCL from reverberatory furnaces range from
0.5 to 1.5 percent by volume.  This volume is too low for processing
in a conventional sulfuric acid plant, which is the accepted control
approach 
-------
all possible practical  techniques, the optimum approach or combination of
approaches for the specific local situation can more readily be selected.
     The new source performance standard for copper, lead, and zinc smelters
exempted the reverberatory furnace SCL control for those cases where the
feed contained quantities of impurities such as arsenic, lead, and zinc
higher than certain specified values.   The reason for this is that usually
high impurity copper concentrates, i.e. dirty feed, are prepared for
smelting by using a preliminary roasting step to control subsequent furnace
and converter processing.  At the time of promulgation, in 1976, information
on the roaster/reverberatory, roaster/electric furnace, or green charge
electric furnace had confirmed capability of providing a suitable matte for
converter processing with impurities.   Since the NSPS assumed that only
flash smelters or electric furnaces would be used for new smelters, it was
necessary to allow use of a reverberatory furnace for dirty feeds in those
locations where electric power was not economically available.  Sulfur
dioxide control from the reverberatory furnace had not been demonstrated
sufficiently at that time.  This study also includes a review of the design
approaches for providing SCL for a new smelter.
     Problems associated with controlling SC^ in existing smelters
are somewhat different than those in new smelters.  The condition of
the equipment can be considerably different in the old smelters
resulting  in dilution effects and lower S02 concentrations in the
offgases.  In addition,  installation of new control equipment may be
more difficult in the case of the older smelters than with a new
design.  Furthermore, new smelters seem to be using flash smelting
or similar systems which  result  in higher concentrations of S02 in
the offgases making them amenable to direct processing in a sulfuric
acid plant.
     The offgas stream blending technique study was conducted by
establishing a series of equipment and operating scenarios
primarily related to a new green field smelter.  The review of
methods for controlling  the reverberatory furnace can, in most
cases, be retrofitted to  existing smelters.   In some cases, the
blending techniques can  also be  retrofitted.

-------
     The use of the blending technique for retrofit was  not completely
studied for application to existing smelters because site specific conditions
strongly affect the utility of this technique.   For example, the character-
istics of the offgas streams from equipment of  similar design can vary from
smelter to smelter, or even within the same smelter with time, depending
on the feed sulfur content variations.  Also, the condition of the operat-
ing equipment will affect the input leakage and result in reduction in S02
concentration for the older equipment.
     The review of the operation of a sulfuric  acid plant processing off-
gases from a copper smelter was also conducted  to determine the most
optimum operating conditions.  It was found that, in some cases, even when
SCL concentration is high enough for direct processing,  combining an FGD
system with an acid plant will tend to reduce the overall load and design
requirements on an acid plant for a copper smelter when compared to using
only a sulfuric acid plant for control.  Acid plant equipment size
is reduced by reducing the volume flow rate and the efficiency in-
creased by raising the S02 concentration.  For example,  when a
magnesium oxide FGD system is used where 10 to 13 percent SCL con-
centration offgas is produced, overall control  system size  (and
cost) is greater than when a citrate system with over 90 percent
generated S02 gas is used.
     Detailed composition of the reverberatory furnace emissions and
its operating characteristics to provide a basis for S02 control
system design are presented.  The factors influencing sulfur dioxide
emissions from within the furnace were determined.  The  effects of
operating practices, firing rate, and operating pressure were
investigated.  Physical configuration of the furnace and sources of
dilution were also defined.
     The sulfur dioxide generation within the reverberatory furnace
can fluctuate from as high as 5.0 percent to as low as 0.1 percent
over a period of time.  It has been found that the major factors
influencing these fluctuations are rate and frequency of furnace
charging and charge composition.  As the charge enters the furnace,

-------
there is a very rapid evolution of sulfur dioxide which then tapers off
until the next charge is introduced.  The large volume of gas within the
furnace tends to reduce the amplitude of these fluctuations, but they can
still be detected in the emission measurements.  Charge composition controls
the availability of sulfur to form sulfur dioxide under furnace operating
conditions.
     Potential metallurgical processing and equipment operating techniques
were investigated that could be used or modified either to  (1) increase the
S02 concentration and reduce offgas volumes to facilitate processing, or (2)
to decrease S02 concentration to a sufficiently low level to allow either
neutralization or direct emissions to the atmosphere with no controls.  The
use of roasters to produce calcine versus the direct processing of "green"
charge indicated that the choice is somewhat dependent upon metallurgical
and energy considerations.  With calcine charge obtained by preroasting,
the amount of S02 generated in the reverberatory furnace can be considerably
reduced (e.g., from an average of 1.5 to 0.5 percent) which can be advant-
ageous with some control techniques.  A strong S02 stream can be obtained
from the roaster (particularly fluid-bed roasters), which can facilitate
overall smelter offgas control.  The S02 concentration leaving the reverber-
atory furnace can be increased by various factors such as preheating air,
reduction of burner excess air, closely controlling furnace pressure to just
below atmospheric, sealing leakage points, charging more uniformly and con-
sistently, and using oxygen enrichment.

     Preheating furnace burner air (required when gas is used for fuel) by
indirect heat exchange reduces the amount of fuel  which must be burned within
the furnace to generate the required smelting heat.   As a result, the quantity
of air required and the associated nitrogen dilution is reduced.   Reduction
of burner excess air entering the furnace also results in a reduction in the
nitrogen dilution effect.   Controlling the furnace pressure to just below
atamospheric (e.g., 0.005  to 0.05 inches water column) minimizes  the quantity
of dilution air that can enter through any leakage point.   Sealing of leakage
points can materially reduce the dilution and increase the average S02 con-
centration.  The more uniformly and consistently the furnace is charged, the
less the amplitude of the  S02 fluctuations, thereby allowing the  design

-------
capacity of  a control system to be minimized.

     Considerable work both in the United States and foreign countries on
adding oxygen to reverberatory furnaces has been conducted.  The general
conclusion is that the increase in S02 concentration resulting from 02
enrichment can vary from 0.3 to as high as 16 percentage points.  The
Caletones smelter in Chile has obtained 5 to 7 percent S0£ operationally
from a green feed reverberatory furnace.  In addition, the production rate
in the furnace can be considerably increased.

     There are at least six different ways of injecting oxygen into the
reverberatory furnace.  The most successful appears to be with a separate
oxy-fuel burner which allows the flame to impinge directly upon the charge
banks.  Development work has indicated that oxygen lancing is another
promising appraoch.  Problems with furnace durability have been encountered.
However, with careful injection of the oxygen in the proper location, it has
been determined that furnace durability per ton of produced copper is not
affected.  When the -furnace is operating at capacity without oxygen enrich-
ment, there  is an economic reason for using this technique if additional
production is required.  In most cases, where the furnace is not required to
operate at peak production, the use of oxygen would only be required for
pollution control reasons unless possibilities for fuel savings are
economically justified.
     Flue gas desulfurization  systems applicable to the reverberatory
furnace were  reviewed.   The objective of the review was to find  full-scale
operating experience on specific systems,  preferably with a reverberatory
furnace, but  at least on a full-scale plant such as a utility.

     Two systems were found that have been operating on the offgases from a
copper smelter reverberatory furnace for at least 2 years.  One was a
magnesium oxide concentration  system that absorbed the S02 from the weak
stream and regenerated it at a concentration in the 10 to 13 percent range.
This is sufficiently high to mix with other gases for direct feeding to a
con/entional  sulfuric acid plant.  The second system that has been in oper-
ation for approximately 4 years is a nonregenerative lime/limestone system.

-------
This particular system was designed to produce gypsum as a saleable product.
Additional systems that were reviewed included ammonia scrubbing, Wellman-
Lord, citrate, and the Cominco and Foster Wheeler coal reduction systems.
Ammonia scrubbing, citrate, and the Cominco coal reduction processes were
used at full or pilot scale on metallurgical plants.  None, however, were
used directly at full scale to process copper smelter reverberatory furnace
offgases.

     A comparison study of the differences between utility and reverberatory
furnace offgases was conducted to determine if technology could be trans-
ferred.  With some adjustment in operating conditions there does not appear
to be any major technical reason why experience with offgases from utility
boilers cannot be applied to reverberatory furnace offgases.  In fact, the
lime/limestone and magnesium oxide system technology was successfully trans-
ferred from power plant to copper smelter reverberatory furnace offgases.
Also there appears to be a strong indication that the ammonia and citrate
scrubbing and the coal reduction systems with metallurgical gas processing
experience can be applied to control S02 from reverberatory furnaces as well
as other weak S02 offgases.

     As part of the flue gas desulfurization study, modifications to con-
ventional  sulfuric acid plant design were reviewed to determine the applica-
bility of direct processing of the weak furnace offgases without concentratic
One system in Japan was successfully used on offgases from copper smelter
furnaces but required considerable energy for gas reheat to promote
catalytic  reaction and refrigeration for water balance.   A design study was
conducted  indicating the potential for using available energy from part of
the reverberatory furnace offgas and rejected heat from acid heat exchangers.
An alternate approach can conserve refrigeration energy by mixing with a
source of  98 percent plus acid or oleum, if available, to maintain acid
plant water balance.

     The potential  primary products from S02 control  systems are sulfur,
liquid S02, sulfuric acid, and gypsum.  Of course, these products can be used
as termediates to make a very wide range of additional byproducts.  Control
system by-product markets and disposal were reviewed.  The most storable and

-------
shipable material is sulfur.  It, however, requires a reducing agent to
produce, which makes it the most costly.  Furthermore, the available reducing
agents are usually fuels.  The selection was limited to coal because of the
energy situation.  At least three smelters have used a system with coal
reductant to produce sulfur on a full-scale basis with gases from equipment
other than reverberatory furnaces.  Liquid S02 has a very limited market but
can be used for producing other products including sulfuric acid.  Presently,
sulfuric acid is the primary product generated by smelter S02 control
techniques.  The distance which sulfuric acid can be economically transported
is limited to 200-1,000 miles.  The smelters in the southwest have the
greatest disadvantage from this standpoint.  Gypsum can be used to make
useful products such as wall board or "thrown-away" as a landfill.  Gypsum
production eliminates the sludge treating problem associated with some lime/
limestone scrubbing systems which do not completely oxidize the product.  It
is a stable product and could be directly disposed of without creating any
water pollution problems.

     Additional data on copper smelter pollution control techniques were
obtained during a visit to Japan in January 1977.  Information from that
trip is included in this study.  The Japanese are more advanced than the U.S.
in S02 control of copper smelters.  By 1978, the Onahama copper smelter at
Iwaki City, Japan, with two conventional green charge reverberatory furnaces,
was required to control 99.5 percent of the total input sulfur.  In 1977,
they were controlling well over 95 percent using either the lime/limestone
gypsum or the MgO-sulfuric acid systems for weak S02 streams.

     It can be concluded from the data included in this study that S02
control of the weak offgas stream from a primary copper smelter reverberatory
furnace has been demonstrated to be technically feasible using several
different approaches or combinations of these techniques.  Control of S02
can be accomplished by blending of strong and weak gas streams with new or
well maintained smelting equipment.  Using processing techniques and
concentration  (FGD) systems maximizes initial stream S02 concentration for
efficient processing in sulfuric acid plants.
                                      8

-------
                             SECTION 2
          CONVENTIONAL COPPER SMELTING AND S02 CONTROL SYSTEMS

2.1  GENERAL
     Conventional practice for the production of blister copper  (ap-
proximately 99 percent pure copper) from copper sulfide ore concen-
trates includes three operations:
     1.   Roasting (optional) to remove a portion of the concentrate
          sulfur content in multihearth roasters or fluid-bed roasters.
     2.   Smelting of the concentrate and fluxes in a reverberatory
          furnace to form slag and copper-bearing matte.
     3.   Oxidizing the matte in a converter to form blister copper.
     Although roasting is a common practice, many smelters through-
out the country bypass this process step and charge the concen-
trates "green"  to a  reverberatory furnace.   Whether a  smelter uses
a roaster or not is  primarily controlled by the copper-to-sulfur
ratio in the feed going to the  reverberatory furnace as well  as
impurities in the ore that must be eliminated pyrometallurgically.
In the case of a custom smelter where  the ratio and impurities  may
change widely with different ores, a roaster is usually required to
control the ratio and subsequent matte grade.
     Other "modern"  smelting systems are used for copper production
today and are discussed in the  literature.   However,  this  study con-
centrates on the copper smelter using  a conventional  system,  namely,
roaster,  reverberatory furnace, and converters  as  discussed in
subsequent paragraphs.

-------
2.2  ROASTING
2.2.1  PROCESS
     A major portion of the sulfur contained in copper concentrates
can be removed through the roasting process.  This sulfur elimination
results in a higher grade matte formed in the reverberatory furnace
and subsequently reduces the oxidation load on the converters.
     Roasting is often practiced prior to reverberatory smelting.
Roasting serves to dry and heat the reverberatory charge by using
the exothermic heat from the roasting reactions.  Hot roaster cal-
cines require considerably less energy for smelting than cold, wet
concentrates.  Therefore, roasting results in a considerable fuel
saving and an increased smelting rate in the reverberatory furnace.
Roasting also increases the copper concentration of the Cu^S: FeS
matte produced during smelting, a factor which decreases the amount
of converting subsequently required.  Roasting is also performed
to regulate  the amount of sulfur so that the material can be effic-
iently melted and matte composition controlled to ensure that cer-
tain volatile impurities are eliminated in the converting step.
     Sulfur  dioxide is a byproduct of roasting.  Its concentration
in the effluent gases can be high (5 percent S02 in new hearth
roaster gases, and 8 to 10 percent S09 in fluid-bed roaster gases)
                                     ^            i
which can effectively be removed as sulfuric acid.   Older  hearth
roaster systems generally produce a much lower SO^ concentration
gas  (1.0 to  2.5 percent) because of input leakage of air.

2.2.2  MULTIHEARTH ROASTERS
     The multihearth roaster is a refractory-lined cylindrical vessel,
fitted with  seven to twelve refractory hearths.  Concentrates are  fed
into the top of the roaster and are raked across each hearth before
falling to the next lower level.  These rakes are attached to a
rotating control shaft.  Air for roasting usually enters at the
bottom of the roaster and moves up counter-currently against the
descending charge and finally,  through a top flue.

                                 10

-------
     The roaster is started by heating to a temperature at which the
concentrates will be ignited by air.   The concentrates, fluxes,  and air
are then introduced resulting in combustion.  Typically, the upper
hearths are used for drying and heating, while lower hearths provide
ignition and oxidation reactions.   Most of the oxidation reactions
are exothermic so that once the ignition temperature is reached, the
system operates autothermally.  The iron sulfides are oxidized to form
Fe2 03 and Fe3 04 preferentially to copper sulfide oxidation.   The
roasted concentrates (calcines) are then delivered to a smelting furnace.
New multihearth roasters can produce an offgas with an average SOp con-
centration of 4 to 5 percent.  Older units with greater inleakage of
dilution air may range from 1 to 3 percent S02 concentration in  the
offgas.  (For a more detailed discussion of multihearth roasters, refer
to Appendix A-l.}

2.2.3  FLUID-BED ROASTERS
     Fluid-bed roasting involves the autogenous oxidizing of sulfide
particles while they are suspended in an evenly distributed stream
of air.  It is based upon the principle that air blowing
through a bed of fine solids tends to support the particles at mod-
erate velocities.  These particles may be permanently suspended in
an expanded or fluidized bed.  The particles are essentially sur-
rounded by air so that rates of gas/solid roasting reactions are
high.  The reactions that occur are similar to those that take place in
multihearth roasters (refer to Appendix A-l).
     Figure 2-1 shows a cutaway of a typical fluid-bed roaster.
Air is blown into the roaster by means of a tuyere plate at the
bottom, and concentrates are added in particulate or slurry form
near the top of the roaster.  The roasting operation is begun by
heating the roaster (usually containing an inert bed of sand or
calcines) to the temperature at which the concentrate will ignite
by air.  Typical temperatures are maintained between 900°F and
1,200°F.  The concentrates are then added, slowly at first, to begin
the roasting and to make the operation autogenous.

                                    11

-------
                                        OFF-OS
SLURRY
 FEED
  TUYERE
  HEADS
                                        PRODUCT
    Figure 2-1.  Typical  Fluid-Bed Roaster
                      12

-------
     Reaction rates within the roaster are rapid, and an important
consequence is the high efficiency of oxygen utilization by the
roasting reactions.  This leads to air requirements only slightly in
excess of the stoichiometric amount.  Sulfur dioxide concentrations
in the effluent roaster gases are considerably higher than those of
the multihearth roaster; 9 percent compared to 5 percent (new units).
(For a more detailed discussion of the fluid-bed roasters, refer to
Appendix A-2.)
     Fluid-bed roasters warrant consideration for weak stream SQ*
control since the blending of fluid-bed roaster, reverberatory fur-
nace, and converter offgas has been reported feasible and produces
                                                 2
a considerably higher combined St^ concentration.

2.3  REVERBERATORY FURNACE
2.3.1  REQUIREMENT FOR CONTROL
     The complex nature of the sulfide ores processed in copper smel-
ters result in generation of S02 from reverberatory furnaces.  The
concentration of S02 in the offgas may vary from an average of 0.5
to 1.5 percent, values too low for direct processing in a sulfuric
acid plant as is currently being done with converter offgases.  Thus,
no smelter in the U.S. today is controlling reverberatory furnace
S02 emissions.  The study, therefore, concentrated on control tech-
nology for this device since over 20 percent of the copper smelter
S0£ emissions can come from this source.

2.3.2  DESIGN
     The primary function of the reverberatory furnace is to eco-
nomically smelt the required copper-bearing charge into a molten
mass.  The basic advantage of smelting concentrates in the rever-
beratory furnace is the good extraction to matte of copper and
precious metals.  The objective of the furnace operation is to
produce separate fluid layers of lower specific gravity discard-
able slag (iron-gangue comprising the top of the bath) and a higher

                                 13

-------
specific gravity matte (consisting theoretically of a mixture of
CUpS: FeS comprising the lower fluid layer).   The matte can  be
separated by selecting tapping levels.   It is then further treated
in converters for separation of Cu from the Fe and S.  The slag is
tapped from the furnace at a higher level  and usually discarded.
     There are two types of reverberatories currently in use, and
they differ principally in the amount of bath and the method of
charging.
     The first type in use, and still extensively used, is the deep-
bath furnace, wherein a molten bath of several feet depth is main-
tained throughout the furnace, covering the entire bottom.  The
charge may be admitted to the furnace by (1)  dropping through the
arch, (2) through retractable or fixed charge guns, (3) discharging
through ports in the sidewalls which extend some distance toward
the middle of the furnace, or in one instance, (4) through green
charge slingers that cover the entire bath in the smelting zone.
A calcined 'charge must be used through charge guns or through arch
drop holes in the center or along the furnace sidewalls.  Green
charge may also be dropped through the arch or introduced through
belt slingers.  In all cases, every effort is made to distribute the
charge on top of the deep molten bath in the smelting area,  to expose
the largest possible area to the heat from the burners and the arch.
Water or air cooled jackets are used in the sidewalls to cool the
refractory where the molten bath is in direct contact with the sidewalls.
     The second type is the side-charged furnace  (refer to Figure
2-2), which is more predominantly in use today and usually has a
bath depth of 3 feet or less.  Basically, the green or calcined
charge is dropped through the arch along the walls to form banks
of material that slowly melt, giving sufficient protection to the
sidewalls to generally eliminate special cooling requirements.
The smelted material forms a liquid bath throughout the center
length of the furnace.  It is adaptable for either calcine or green
feed charging or a combination of both.  Typically, feed is gravity-
charged into hoppers staggered along each side of the furnace and
                                 14

-------
located above drop holes through an arch, a few inches in from the
sidewalls.  The hoppers may be fed by calcine car discharge, drag
chain distribution of calcine or green feed, or by conveyor belt
and tripper car for green feed.  As the angle of repose of the
charge bank is lesser with calcine charging, the height of the
charge pile must be lower or the width of the furnace must be
greater than for the bath smelting type.  A particular hazard in
side charging is the possibility of a portion of the charge bank
flowing, caving in, or sloughing into the molten bath and creating
a rapid or even explosive reaction between charge and bath with an
accompanying boiling and rapid gas evolution, particularly with re-
gard to green or wet feed charging.  When using the latter, there
have been rare instances where the generated pressure was strong
enough to damage the furnace arch and even blowoff portions or sec-
tions.
                                                              Matte
      Burner!
                   'Mttte
        Figure 2-2.  Side-Charging Calcine by Drag Chains
               (Green Feed Can be Fed in Same Manner)
                                 15

-------
     Either sprung or suspended arches may be used in furnaces of
either type.   If the width of the  arch is  greater than  25  feet,
a suspended type arch must be used as  hot  brick  strengths  limit
the width of sprung arches.
     A description of typical reverberatory furnace,  control  system
design and operation, and a brief  history  and discussion of smel-
ter energy relationships are included  in Appendix B.

2.3.3  FACTORS AFFECTING S02 EMISSIONS FROM REVERBERATORY  FURNACES
2.3.3.1   Chemistry of Reverberatory Furnace Smelting
     An  analysis of the chemistry  occurring in copper smelting must
include  a discussion of the input, the reactions being  conducted
within the equipment, and the output product.  Generally,  the copper
ores considered are the sulfides which can include chalcocite,
Cu2S - 79.8 percent copper; bornite, Cu5FeS4 - 63.3 percent copper;
tetrahedrite, Cu5Sb2S7 - 57.5 percent  copper; chalcopyrite, CuFeS2
- 34.5 percent copper; and pyrite, FeS2 which, though not  a copper
ore, is  frequently associated with copper  bearing minerals.3
Of these, chalcopyrite is the most important ore, particularly in
the United States.  The percentage of copper in  most ores  mined  is
relatively low and therefore, in essentially all cases  it  is con-
centrated by various methods, generally flotation.  Concentration
ratios may vary from 5 to 1 to as  high as  40 to 1.
     Sulfide ores are mixtures of  varying  proportions of copper
and iron sulfides mixed with acidic or basic gangue.   In smelting,
advantage is taken of the pronounced affinity of iron for  oxygen.
Of the commoner metals, iron has the greatest affinity for this
element.  When a variety of copper ores are melted together they
will invariably form cuprous sulfide,  Cu2S.  If the proportion of
sulfur in the melt exceeds that required to form Cu?S,  the excess
will unite with any available iron to form ferrous sulfide, FeS.
The two compounds, Cu2S and FeS, form a series of mixtures with
an equilibrium diagram shown in Figure 2-3.

                                16

-------
o 900
4)
a
I eoo
i-
  700

  600
                      ^~l TronsWmotiorTisO'G^K crystallization of Cu2S
                      -io'     ill    N I        I
                                           FeS in Cu2S plus eutectic
                                           Solid Solution FeS in
                                                Cu2S
                    100 90  80  70  60  50  40  30  20   10  0
                                       Fe S %
                    O  10  20  30  40  50  60  70  80   90  100
                                      Cu2S %
                                Composition by Weight %
              Figure  2-3.  Equilibrium  Diagram CU2S-FeS

     In copper ore smelting the metallurgist aims at  producing
mixtures  of  Cu^S and FeS containing  anywhere from 19  to  45 percent
copper (equivalent to 23.5 to 56  percent Cu-S).   These  mixtures
are known  as mattes.  They invariably  contain small amounts of
other sulfides such  as PbS and ZnS as  well as appreciable proportions
of magnetite, Fe,0., wustite FeO, and  on occasion, free  iron.
  Primary  reactions  occurring during copper smelting  including
roasting,  smelting and converting, are as follows:
         Roasting:

         Smelting:
     2 FeS + 3 0,
FeO + 2 SO,
                      FeS + SO
                    CuFeS
                                   17

-------
     Converting:   Slag  Blow
                    2 FeS  +  3  02 —>•  2  Fe 0  +  2  S02
                  Finish Blow
2CU20 +Cu.
PII <; + n

In ^ C. V^Up U T t- «
^ ? nil + sr^

)\Jn

     The actual chemistry occurring within the pyrometallurgical
equipment can be quite complex.   Additional  reactions occur in all
steps, but'the aforementioned process above represents the major ob-
jectives to produce copper from common ore mixtures.
     Most reverberatory furnaces are operated with excess air.
However, if there are areas within the furnace where the atmosphere
is either reducing or neutral (no oxidation), the sulfur in combi-
nation with the copper in excess of that required by the compound
Cu2S will be expelled by volatilization.  The resulting cuprous
sulfide is rather stable and will fuse without decomposing.  Thus,
covellite or cupric sulfide, CuS, when heated to a high temp-
erature in the absence of air will decompose according to the
equation:
                      2 CuS 	*•  Cu2S + S

yielding molten cuprous sulfide and volatized sulfur.   In practice,
this sulfur is carried away with other gaseous products of combus-
tion until it comes in contact with air, when it is oxidized to S02-
Similarly, when iron sulfides are heated in an atmosphere which is
not oxidizing all excess sulfur required by the compound, FeS will
expel by volatilization.  Then, the resulting stable ferrous sulfide
will fuse without decomposing.
     Iron which does not enter the matte as sulfide  is  oxidized to
FeO and, together with silicate forming elements, unites with the
                                 18

-------
silicate to form a complex fusable material called slag.  Usually
from 0.3 to 0.55 percent copper is still found in this material and
may be lost or saved for further processing.  The various fluxes
added to the ore charge make the slag composition fusable and
fluid in the furnace.  This aids in maintaining copper in the matte
phase and separation of matte from slag.
     Magnetite (Fe.,0.) may be formed in roasters, converters, or
the furnace and introduced during reverberatory smelting.  Magnet-
ite produces problems in inhibiting the separation of slag and
matte in the furnace as well as causing buildup of the furnace
bottom.   FeS, when present in the charge, tends to provide reduc-
ing conditions which suppress magnetite formation.  Also, a highly
siliceous slag will tend to minimize its formation; however, this
tends to produce a lower grade matte.  Raising the temperature
of the matte will  also minimize magnetite formation.
     The products  of sulfide ore smelting are matte, slag,
dust, fume, and gases.  Slag is the product of a reaction
between  the gangue of the ore and the fluxes introduced with the
charge.   Dust results from agitation within the furnace.
The fume and gases are formed by the chemical reactions within the
furnace.  Those concentrates with easily volatilized ("dirty")
materials, usually heavy metal sulfides, will form fumes which
are smaller particles than dusts.
     Reverberatory furnace flue gases typically may contain the
following:
               N2                72   - 76   percent
               C02              10   - 17   percent
               CO                 0.0 -  0.1 percent
               0?                 0.5 -  6.0 percent
               HpO               4.0 - 10.0 percent
               S0?               0.5-2.0 percent
                                 19

-------
     The amounts of CCL and H?0 will  depend upon the fuel  used and
the amount of moisture in the charge; the SC^ content will  depend
upon the sulfur elimination from the charge.   A large part of the
free oxygen may be due to leakage of air through charging  holes
and other openings in the furnace.   These gases will leave  the
furnace at a temperature of 1,800°to 2,300°F.
     The precious metals, gold and  silver, contained in the charge
are included in the matte when it is withdrawn from the furnace.
Composition of various mattes  varies  from 23 to 44 percent
iron, 23 to 27 percent sulfur and 24 to over 50 percent copper.
     In practice the sulfur divides itself primarily between the
matte and the gases with some going to the slag.  That in  the
matte forms CUpS and FeS; that in the gases burns mostly to SCL.
Generally, the sulfur which volatilizes and burns to SCL varies
from 15 to 30 percent of the total  sulfur charged.
     The dust generated by the furnace will depend upon the fine-
ness of the particles in the charge, the type of furnace,  the method
of charging, and many other factors.   Fume (material which  has been
volatilized or sublimed and then condensed when the gases  cool)
may be a large portion of the dust.  The most important constitu-
ents found as fume in copper smelters are:  (1) the lower  volatile
oxides of arsenic and antimony  (A$203, and Sb203);  (2) oxides of
other volatile metals such as PbO and ZnO; (3) condensed water
vapor; and (4) sulfuric acid and sulfates. Sulfur trioxide  may be
formed from oxidation of SOp and the SO., combined with water vapor
to form droplets of sulfuric acid,  or it may be combined with certain
basic oxides, notably ZnO, to form ZnSO,.

2.3.3.2  Weak Sulfur Dioxide Evolution and Influencing Factors
     Figure 2-4 shows a series of S02 versus time curves for three
reverberatory furnaces at three smelters.  Hhile the differences
in amplitude can be explained by "available" sulfur present
(refer to Section 2.3.3.3), the peaks occur immediately after
                                 20

-------
   in
   s
 3 I~H
 UJ    O O i—
 co oo  in LO m
 UJ CD  «I CO O
o
O
 CM
o
o
I—
«t
o.
o
«r
_i
Q.
           o
           00
     O Q  D.
     o >-
     o cn  •—
     vo co  cvj

     r-^ C3  O

     II  II  M

     UJ LU  UJ
     C3 U3  CD

     s §  g
     QJ UJ  UJ
     > >  >
     <£ CC  «t
     _  _ _
     0.0.0-
            o

            U3
                            !,,!,,,,p,;lir-1
                                             mmmn.
                       TV   j_^_{_::: j :i:iv;7j~iis>  .:::.=!:.:::::::! : i X. •

                                       ;i;;i-:::li;i;i9i: 'iJrr^l k!:I!/ il
                                                                    o
                                                                    vo
                                                                    o
                                                                    in
                                                                ..  o
                                                                     oo
                                                                     UJ
                                                                   in
                                                                   C\J
                                                                   O
                                                                   OJ
                                                                               oo
                                                                               CU
                                                                               O
                                                                               fO
                                                                               C
                                                                               s-
                                                                               3
                                                                               fO
                                                                               S-
                                                                               O)
                                                                              -Q
                                                                               i-
                                                                               O)
                                                                               C
                                                                               O)

                                                                               O)
                                                                               O>
                                                                               O)
                                                                               s-
                                                                               §
                                                                              a
                                                                              00
                                                                              i-
                                                                              
-------
dropping the charge; this cycle is directly related to the charging
cycle.  Figure 2-5 is a trace showing S02 versus time for one
smelter in Japan.
     There are many factors that affect the SOp evolution with
time from a copper smelter reverberatory furnace.   The following
major factors influence SCL evolution:
     • Charge composition
     • Calcine or green charge
     • Method of charging
         - Side charge (wall or roof)
         - Top charge
         - Bath charge
         - Continuous or intermittent charge
     • Converter slag charging
     • Revert charging
     • Reducing or oxidizing atmosphere
     • Firing rate and effective air/fuel ratio
     Other factors that influence the SCL evolution include
bath agitation, dilution air allowed to enter, separate processing
for converter slag, use of bedding systems to minimize charge
composition variation, and source of ores.

2.3.3.3  Charge Composition Variation
     Some of the smelters operate with foreign ores and some take
materials and products from other smelters to give a relatively wide
range of feed or charge materials.  For example, ASARCO/Tacoma usu-
ally processes foreign charge which is high in arsenic and rich in
copper and gold.  They also produce arsenic trioxide as a product.
The ASARCO/E1 Paso smelter processes not only concentrates, but
in addition, copper residues, lead compounds, copper drosses from
lead plants, and zinc blends which provides it with a relatively
broad range of constituents and feed characteristics.  Copper drosses
contain relatively small quantities of sulfur.  Some smelters,
such as Phelps Dodge/Douglas and ASARCO/Hayden, process calcines
from roasters.  Additional nonconcentrate materials that may be
                                 22

-------
                                                   O)
                                                   o
                                                   to
                                                   c
                                                   s.
                                                   3
                                                  O
                                                  •M
                                                  (O

                                                  O)
                                                  JD

                                                  Ol
                                                  >
                                                  QJ
                                                  oe

                                                  (O

                                                  (O
                                                  o

                                                  o
                                                  0)
                                                  s-
                                                  O)
                                                  to
                                                  c
                                                  o
                                                  CO
                                                  to
                                                   CXJ
                                                 o
                                                 t/5
                                                  c:
                                                  O)
                                                  o
                                                  S-
                                                  a)
                                                 D.
                                                  LT>
                                                   I
                                                  CVJ

                                                  (U
                                                  s.
                                                  3
                                                  CT)
23

-------
added are plant cleanup, Cottrell  and/or multiclone dust,  scrap
brass fines, primary ores of varying nature,  "dead" calcine,  spill
material, raw silica or limestone, acid sludge,  silica slurry,
revert material, and other materials that are fed to reclaim the
copper content or for disposal.   In most cases,  input material  is
mixed in bedding systems allowing  some control  of feed constituents.
     The ore or concentrate composition has  a very important bear-
ing upon the amount of sulfur which is eliminated in the reverber-
atory.  Calcines usually contain little sulfur  in excess of matte
requirements.  Consequently, calcine-fed furnace gases are lower
in SOp content.  The higher the  degree of roast, the less  sulfur
is present for release in the reverberatory  within a reasonable
degree of smeltability of the calcine.
     Calcine-fed furnaces using  a  high degree of roast emit the
least S02 in the exit gases, ranging down to  0.35 percent  S0?.
Heat in the calcine reduces energy requirements  and consequently
reduces nitrogen dilution from combustion air.  However, this is
balanced by the fact that some sulfur has already been eliminated
in the roaster.  Wet or green charge furnaces tend to typically
emit  an  average of  1.5  percent S09  compared to an average of 0.5 for
               c                  t.
calcine charge.     Matte requirements and specific operating
conditions will, of course, vary these results.
     Pyritic ore may be defined  as a material which tends to lose
one atom of sulfur  when  heated such as  FeS^, CuS, CuFeS^.  These
materials are unstable at smelting temperatures and, therefore,
easily lose their first sulfur atom.  An analysis of the feed
material to the three smelters producing the S02 elimination
curves in Figure 2-4 was provided  by ASARCO.    The percentage of
copper and sulfur, with the sulfur-to-copper ratio in the  roaster
calcine at the three ASARCO smelters is as follows:
                                24

-------
                            Roaster Calcine
                             (Percent)
                                   Cu        S        S/Cu
            Tacoma  (Curve  A)       27.1     25.8     0.952
            Hayden  (Curve  B)       24.0     18.3     0.763
            El  Paso  (Curve C)      24.3     17.9     0.737

     From Figure 2-4, Tacoma has the highest S02 emissions,  followed
by considerably lower values for Hayden,  then  El Paso.   Calcine com-
position, stable sulfides, and pounds  of  sulfur  as stable sulfide
per 1,000 pounds of calcine are shown  in  the following  table for
the Tacoma smelter:
 Calcine Composition                         Per  1,000 Ib Calcine
      (Percent)         Stable Sulfide      Ib $  as Stable Sulfide
      Cu  27.1                Cu2S                    68.2
      Fe  21.5                FeS                     123.2
      Pb   1.3                PbS                       2.0
      As   4.7                As2S                    30.1
      Sb   0.87              Sb2S3                     3.4
                                          Total      226.9
     The total sulfur per 1,000 Ib of calcine at Tacoma is 258 Ib.
The pyrite sulfur is equal to 258.0 - 226.9 which is equal to 31.1  Ib.
Similarly for Hayden, the pyritic sulfur is equal to 18.1  Ib and
for El Paso 6.0 Ib.   Thus, more pyritic sulfur is available at
Tacoma, and subsequently  less at Hayden and El Paso, respectively.
The amplitude of the S02 elimination curves (Figure 2-4)  from their
respective reverberatory furnaces follows these numbers.   It is,
of course, not possible to completely roast all of the above
pyritic sulfur, but it can be expected that the S02 emission trend
would be in the direction of availability.
                                25

-------
     A so-called "over-roast" or excess removal of sulfur results
in smelting difficulties when calcines in this condition are fed
to the furnace.  When too much sulfur is oxidized, formation of FeS
is prevented and iron is forced to go to FeO or Fe^ magnetite re-
ducing the ability to form matte.  Concentrates high in iron pyrites
and  other iron sulfides have excess sulfur which can result in higher
SCL  in furnace gases in the presence of free oxygen.  Additionally,
a higher matte grade usually denotes less sulfur in the charge and
lower S02 emissions.  Techniques of charging, frequencies, etc., have
little bearing on raising or lowering total SQ^ emitted unless the
smelting rate is deliberately varied unproportionally and unecono-
mical^.

2.3.3.4  Method of Charging
     Charging methods vary considerably both in terms of handling
of the charge and rate at which it is fed into the furnace.  There
are  no smelters in the United States that are top charged (through
the  center portion of the roof), but some smelters will charge
along the wall through the roof, and some will charge through the
wall.  Those charging calcine through the wall typically use Wag-
staff guns, which are essentially chutes that pass the charge into
the  furnace.  At least three per furnace are used, each charging
a different area.  This charge technique tends to spread the charge
over the molten bath more uniformly.
     When the charge is dropped along the walls from the top, it
tends to build up piles directly underneath the entry points.  The
Ajo  smelter has a belt slinger that actually slings the charge to
better distribute it over the molten bath.  Calcine charges are
usually fed using the Wagstaff or fixed type of gun exclusively.
Some smelters will alternate or mix calcine charge at one point
and  green charge at another point.  Mixing calcine and green feed
with drag chains  was tried at Morenci  and then abandoned  because
of too many problems.   Also,  Anaconda  tried mixing calcine  and
green charge using a screw conveyor system.   This  mixing  did not
                                 26

-------
prove satisfactory.  Alternate feeding of calcine and green charge
can result in almost continuous feed.  There does not seem to be
any direct correlation in sulfur evolution with charge method,
only charge frequency.
     There also is not necessarily any even or regular charging
time.  Even though the curves in Figure 2-4 show approximately 20
minute charge times, this does not always hold true and may vary
considerably up to even 2 hours for some furnaces and down to
10 minutes for others.
     Furnace charging and furnace firing are controlled entirely
by the operator.  The operator's main criterion for charging and
firing is visual observation of the internal portion of the furnace.
This includes the flame, the melting charge condition, and the
temperature of the refractory which is obtained either by pyro-
metric means or observation of the brick color.  While the opera-
tor is continuously pushing the furnace for maximum production, he
must be careful not to overcharge.  Overcharging can cause the fur-
nace to be "killed" or the temperature to drop.  The furnace must
be continuously watched as it is being fed, and the charging must be
adjusted accordingly.  The principle of furnace feeding is to achieve
maximum exposure of the charge to heat.
     Sulfur evolution primarily depends upon the smelting activity
in the furnace.  The objective of reverberatory furnace smelting
is to use both the heat from the flame above and the heat from the
molten bath below.  During normal operation of a reverberatory fur-
nace, the stronger SOp emissions are generated at the time the charge
is introduced and during bubbling or a high degree of turbulence.
It is desirable to have intimate contact between slag FeO
and silica.  This is promoted by the bubbling action.  Fine grind-
ing and mixing of the charge before introduction into the furnace
will also promote mixing,but the greatest amount or effect occurs
with the bubbling within the furnace.  Sometimes the bubbling does
not occur resulting in reduced reaction rate.   When there is a
"flat bed" the operator will generally raise the temperature.
                                 27

-------
     With the Wagstaff gun, the calcine charge is floated on the
molten bath.  There tends to be a more uniform spreading of the
charge over the bath, although the rapid input of the material
causes S02 surges.   Even with the floating of the charge, there
is still bubbling.   The charge may stick in the charge car or gun
and require hammering to dislodge.  This can change the charge fre-
quency and rate.  At other times it may flow into the furnace very
rapidly.
     Continuous charging which might level off SCL fluctuations
is not used in many smelters because it tends to cause local over-
charging which can reduce the temperature in the furnace below the
efficient level.  Also, every time there is a charging operation,
additional dilution air enters the furnace.  The charge material
used in the furnace is not always consistent and contains
various constituents at different times which also tends to inhibit
continuous charging.  Some smelters do not have bedding areas and
will take the charge as it comes in, also promoting greater varia-
tion.  For example, at Chino, New Mexico, the concentration copper
grade varied from 12 to 25 percent in a period of  3 days.
     However, it should be noted that continuous reverberatory
furnace charging can and is  being used.  Detailed discussion  of
actual operating smelters using continuous charging is presented
in Appendix C.

2.3.3.5   Converter Slag Return
     Normally,  converters are skimmed of slag at hourly  intervals.
However,  variation can range from five ladles in 1 hour to as
much as 2 hours with no skimming.  Depending upon the composition
of the converter slag, there tends to be a large increase in  SCL
evolution when  it is introduced into the furnace.  Converter  slag
differs from furnace slag in silica content.  This causes increased
gas evolution with resulting turbulence, and also in its higher iron
oxide and magnetite content.  Some of this magnetite is reduced by
sulfides  present.
                                 28

-------
     The equations relating converter slag reactions  are:
          02 + FeS + Fe304—M Fe 0 + S02
     Finish Slag
          Cu20 +  FeS + 02 —*FeO + S09 + 2Cu

     Finish slag  may be transferred to the converter and held after
the blister has been poured.
     An indication of the composition of the reverberatory furnace
and converter slag is shown herein.

           Slag                Percent FeO      Percent Si02
Reverberatory furnace slag         39              38 - 39
Converter slag                     50              25 - 26

The principal reason for not returning converter slag to the rever-
beratory furnace  is to eliminate the silica content resulting in
less reverberatory furnace slag and less silica.  At some smelters,
they may have metal value in the slag, such as gold and silver,
making it more worthwhile to process the converter slag rather than
return it to the  converters.
     It is, of course, possible to eliminate the S02 peaks due to
converter slag return by processing the converter slag in a concen-
tration system (refer to Appendix D).  Processing the converter
slag separately also tends to reduce the amount of magnetite that
enters the reverberatory.  It is also more expensive.  Kennecott/
Hayden and several other smelters slow cool their converter slag
in pits and send it back to the concentrator for retreatment.

2.3.3.6  Charge Bank Sloughing
     Emission variations  occur when,  for example, with side wall
charging,a section of the bank will slough off  and cause a rapid
                                 29

-------
 reaction because of the greater surface exposed to the molten bath.
 This will be accompanied by an increase in S02 production.
      There is a minimum of charge-sloughing in calcine-fed  furnaces
unless large piles of calcine are accumulated due to force-feeding in
specific areas.   With green feed furnaces,  there is always the likeli-
hood of sloughing unless charge banks are specifically maintained
for maximum smelting.  Automatic or careless charging can result in
overcharging  some areas and increases the  likelihood of sloughing.
A properly operated furnace has practically no sloughing.
      Another factor causing sloughing is undercutting of the charge
banks by the liquid bath,thereby also increasing the reaction area.
This is especially prevalent when matte is  tapped from the smelting
zone (under charge piles), instead of near the outlet end of the fur-
nace.
      The magnitude of gas evolution during any sloughing is a func-
tion of the amount of charge that reacts with the bath and any mois-
ture that may be present which is converted to steam.  If the con-
centrate is not partially dried and the charge contains excess mois-
ture, there is naturally more steam evolved.  If the sloughing is
violent enough to  allow  contact  of heavy moisture-laden  material
with the matte in  the bath, an explosion inevitably  results from
rapid evolution of steam and hydrogen  sulfide.

2.3.3.7   Furnace Firing  Conditions
     The furnace is operated under negative draft.  The amount of
infiltration air that enters the furnace is primarily dependent upon
the effective open area  resulting from cracks, gaps, and ports as
well as the operating pressure.  In addition, primary and secondary
air may be introduced at  the burner along with the fuel.  The moisture
in the charge and  the combustion and smelting reactions all  contribute
gases making up the total flue gas.
     The  ratio of  fuel to the total air entering the furance will  be
the major factor in determining  whether the gases are oxidizing or
                                  30

-------
reducing.  If a reducing atmosphere can be achieved in the furnace,
an increase in SCk concentration can be expected.  On the other
hand, the lower the air-to-fuel,ratio, the lower the heat release
per unit weight of fuel.
     The reason a higher SCL concentration occurs under more fuel-rich
conditions is that the amount of air entering is reduced by the dilution
effect of the additional nitrogen.  This is illustrated by the operation
at the Onahama smelter in Japan where SCL concentration out of the
                                                                     8
reverberatory furnace averages 2.6 percent without oxygen enrichment.
Figure 2-6 shows a gas material balance for the Onahama reverberatory
furnace.  Calculations indicating interactions within the furnace are
presented in Appendix E and discussed in Section 2.4.  The total  volume
of air required for stoichiometric combustion of the fuel is
        o
1,948 Nm /min (33,474 scfm).  The total volume of air required for
                               o
bath sulfur oxidation is 183 Nm /min (6,468 scfm).   Thus, total
volume of air required for combustion of fuel and bath sulfur oxidation
is 1,131 Nm3/min.  The 1,240 Nm3/min (43,790 scfm)  air used in the
furnace entering from burner air and infiltration indicates that  the
furnace is being operated with approximately 10 percent excess air which
could be used up by some oxidation of iron sulfide.   In any case, this
would seem to indicate that the furnaces are being operated very  close
to or even slightly on the fuel rich side of the stoichiometric air to
fuel ratio.  Also, the above analysis shows that at least 25 percent of
the air required to burn the fuel  is obtained from the infiltration
component.  The fact that average S02 concentration in Japanese green
charge reverberatory furnaces is in the 2 to 3 percent range compared
to 1.5 percent typically for U.S.  smelters may partially be explained by
operation in the more fuel rich range.  Extensive sealing of all  openings
in the furnace and downstream gas handling system as well as relatively
close control of furnace pressure minimizes infiltration air, also
tending to increase S0? concentration.
     Preheating of burner air will also tend to increase S02 con-
centration by reducing the amount of fuel that is required in the
furnace to maintain smelting temperatures.  Combustion gases and
the diluting nitrogen are of course reduced.  It is estimated that
                                 31

-------
  ro
>  s.

• <
>o o
t- Q-
•U I—
c
01 O
O ID
c. en
O
o
                                                                                              QJ
                                                                                              to
                                                                                              (O
                                                                                             C3

                                                                                              Ol
                                                                                              O
                                                                                              IT3
                                                                                              o
                                                                                              +J
                                                                                              fC

                                                                                              CD
                                                                                              _Q
                                                                                              o:
                                                                                              O
                                                                                               O


                                                                                               O
                                                                                              •r—
                                                                                              •4->
                                                                                               fO

                                                                                               
-------
preheating the reverberatory furnace secondary burner air at the
Onahama smelter to 400°C (751°F) increases S02 strength by 0.1 to
0.2 percent.  The use of separate oxygen fuel  burners increases
the S02 by 0.3 percent for each burner used (refer to Section 3.9.).

2.3.3.8  Reduced Operation Effects
     To maintain maximum efficiency and economy, it is desirable to
prevent any reduction or cessation of operations.  Various plants
use different techniques during operational varations, but none
are as economical as undisturbed operation.
     In spite of undesirable effects, it is occasionally necessary
to reduce or suspend operations.  The heat loss through the brick
arch and furnace walls is somewhat constant but does vary slightly
as a function of the internal heat.  Unless a furnace shutdown is
indicated, the internal heat must be maintained sufficiently to
keep the bath molten whether the furnace is smelting or not.  The
exit gases will be reduced in volume but only slightly reduced in
temperature.  Sulfur dioxide content will drop proportionally to
any remaining smelting or roasting action within the furnace.
     The alternative for furnace shutdown is to smelt out all the
charge, completely drain the liquid bath, and then seal all fur-
nace openings and close all dampers.  This allows the completely
sealed furnace to start cooling down.  It will then take from 2 weeks
to a month for the furnace to cool down completely with bottoms re-
taining high temperatures 200°C (400°F) for several months unless
air and water cooling is used.   Upon startup,  it will then be
necessary to preheat for at least 2 weeks at 93°C (200°F) rise per day
average to get the unit up to smelting temperature.  Furnace gases
will start containing S0? as soon as any new charge is again smelted.

2.3.3.9  Fuel Supplied Sulfur
     Sulfur in oil or coal fuels can contribute to the S02 released
in the reverberatory furnace.  There is usually no significant
sulfur from this source if gas is used as the furnace fuel.
                                 33

-------
     For example,  at  the  Onahama  smelter, Bunker C oil is used with a
2.5 percent  sulfur content.   This produces approximately 3.5 percent of
the total SCL  volume  generated in the furnace.   Refer to Appendix E for
calculations.
     It can  be expected that, in  the near future, more smelters will be
using oil and  eventually  pulverized coal  in the reverberatory furnaces
because of the energy situation in the United States.

2.3.3.10  Sulfur  Dioxide  Stratification
     It is known  that vertical stratification of S02 concentration gen-
erally exists  in  the  reverberatory furnace.  At Onahama, the maximum
concentration  of  S02  appears approximately 1 m above the bath and
decreases form this point to a negligible amount at the roof.
     Table 2-1 and Figure 2-7 summarize sample data taken by Kennecott at
                        O
the Magna, Utah smelter  reverberatory furnace and also indicate high SOg
concentration  at  the  bath level with reduction toward the roof.
     As the  gases are passed through the furnace uptake, waste heat
boiler and precipitator,  they become mixed and this stratification
effect disappears (Table  2-1).  There have been no attempts to collect
the richer SO- streams for processing.

   Table  2-1.   AVERAGE DRY GAS COMPOSITION  (PERCENT BY VOLUME) AND
               FURNACE DRAFT AT VARIOUS SAMPLING STATIONS
                      NO.  1 REVERBERATORY FURNACE9
Sampling
Station 1
2


4


5

6

7

Sampling
Point
7. S02
I C02
X 02
T. CO
1A
0.8
9.2
3.3
0.3
IB
0.9
9.3
1.7
0.7
2A_
0.7
9.1
2.6
0.4
2B
0.9
9.1
1.7
0.6
2C
0.9
9.3
1.7
0.5
4A
0.8
9.6
1.9
0.0
4B
0.8
9.5
1.3
0.1
4C
1.0
9.7
0.9
0.2
5A
0.7
9.3
2.6
0.1
SB
1.1
9.8
1.4
0.0
5C_
1.1
9.4
1.1
0.3
6A
1.1
9.9
2.2
0.0
6B
1.3
9.3
2.3
0.0
7A
1.0
9.3
2.5
0.0
7B
1.1
9.8
2.0
0.0
Draft    0.14 0.14  0.05 0.10 0.12  0.09 0.10 0.11  0.10 0.09 0.08   0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03
(in. HO)

(1)  Reported as X dry gas at saturation point of 80°F.


                                  34

-------
                                                              -=**

                                                                   f?
                                                  » u
                                                  • IP
                            raroivtT^rr
                                                         f]

2.3.4
             Figure 2-7.   Sampling Stations and Points
                    No.  1  Reverberatory Furnace
COMPARISON OF U.S.  AND JAPANESE REVERBERATORY FURNACE
PRACTICE
     A description of the  Onahama and Naoshima smelter reverberatory
furnaces and general  operating  practice in Japan is presented in
Appendices  F and G, respectively.   In general, there is no appreci-
able difference in construction between the green charge reverber-
atories at Onahama and the calcine  reverberatory at Naoshima when
compared to U.S. designs.   Actually, they were designed by a U.S.
consultant.

     Figure 2-6 is a  schematic  of an Onahama reverberatory furnace
gas system with typical  values  of material flow.  A material  bal-
ance was made in an attempt to  determine the differences between
U.S. and Japanese furnace  practice  that results in higher S02 off-
gas concentrations in Japan.  Appendix E summarizes the results.
                                 35

-------
     These calculations indicate (and it  was  later  confirmed  by Mitsu-
bishi Metals Co.)  that the Onahama  furnaces are  operating  with below
theoretical air in the burner end of the  furnace and  total  air supplied
is only 10 percent over theoretical.   This could explain a difference in
S0? concentration.  It can also result in lower  fuel  efficiency.
     Although the reverberatory furnaces  are  almost conventional
in design and operation, the following summarizes those factors
that appear to contribute to higher S02 in the Onahama reverbera-
tory gas as compared to U.S. experience:
     1.  The furnaces are very tightly constructed and kept sealed
so as to minimize air infiltration.  There are no external openings
to the furnaces except those necessary for burners, slag receivings
and charging.  All unnecessary openings developing are calked with
mineral wool and cements applied by hand  trowel.  Bridgewall  burner
clearances are minimal.  Slag spout openings  are tightly closed  by
doors when launders are withdrawn and all spout cleaning is done
external to the furnace.  There are no side openings in the furnaces,
and charge ports are kept sealed whenever charge is not being
admitted.  Only one of three ports  on each side of the furnace are
usually open at one time.    There  appears to be no need to bar
down for port cleaning.  The charge is dried  to less than 8 percent
moisture before being charged so it is free flowing through ports
and on furnace banks, resulting in  less moisture-caused volume
increase in furnace gases.
     2.  Combustion air is  kept below theoretical and with infiltration
air  is only 10 percent over theoretical for sulfur and fuel oxidation.
     3.  As most  of the concentrates are shipped to Japan from
foreign sources,  their producers, because shipping costs are based on
weight and not grade, endeavor to ship concentrates of highest possible
grade.  As sulfur is combined with copper in  the common minerals, the
concentrates are  generally  high in sulfur content (at least 28 percent).
Also at Onahama,  other minerals that may be smelted in reverberatories
in the U.S. such  as secondaries, cement copper, scrap brass fines,
dusts  (pelletized), etc., are all smelted in the converters.
                                 36

-------
      4.   Natural  gas  fuels  used  in most U.S. smelters have been
 desulfurized  so  there is  no sulfur input  from the  fuel source.
 The  dryer furnace feed in Onahama tends to slightly enrich' fur-
 nace gas  SCk  by  decreasing  volume resulting from the reduction in
 furnace fuel  requirements.
      5.   Preheating of the  secondary  air  has contributed  to more
 rapid  smelting and consequent  release of  combined  sulfur.  This is
 estimated to  increase SCL strength by 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points.
 A  higher  degree  of air preheat would  increase the  percent S0? fur-
 ther.  Additionally,  the  use of  oxy-fuel  burners accelerates the
 smelting  rate.   It is claimed  that each burner results in an over-
 all  S0? increase of 0.3 percent  in exit gases.
      6.   Contributing to  the increased smelting rate is the large
 sizing of the cross sectional  areas of the furnaces in the smelting
 zone.  Nearly all  other plants do not have this feature although it
 was  originally conceived  in the  old Arizona United Verde  in the
 1920's.   The  furnace  outlet flues are also larger  in cross section
 which  results in lower pressure  drop.  The lower pressure drop al-
 lows operation at negative  pressures  closer to atmospheric which
 minimizes leakage of  dilution  air.
      7.   Combustion and feeding  are instrument-controlled so as to
 produce a steady level  of operation,and furnace interiors can be
 observed  by closed-circuit  TV  at all  times.  Needed minor adjust-
 ments  to  furnace operations can  be made almost instantly, before
 adverse conditions can do any  harm or affect the steady flow of
 maximum S02-  Assays  of slag,  silica, mixed ore, and matte can be
 obtained  within  an hour to  further indicate and facilitate needed
 adjustments.  Daily composites are normally analyzed each 24 hours
 by a Phillips X-ray Spectro Meter connected to a computer readout.

     No other factors were  found that influenced the higher Japan-
ese SOp content than is considered normal  for U.S.  furnaces.   The
SOp is sampled after furnace gases pass through the waste  heat boil-
ers and electrostatic precipitators  and are entering the  treatment

                                 37

-------
plants so actual furnace gases would contain a fraction higher.
This effect is minimized by the straight-through two drum type
boilers with air tight ash pits containing no baffles or diverters,
making them practically air tight.  The precipitators are of welded
construction and are well  insulated, appearing to be airtight.
All units in the sequence are spaced very closely together, thus
there are no long flues to leak, contrary to most older smelters.
     The maintenance and operation of the calcine charged Naoshima
reverberatory furnace is similar to that at Onahama.  Greater use
of television observation of the bath allows very close control
of smelting conditions.  As the charge is fed from each Wagstaff
gun, the activity in the furnace is continuously visually monitored.
It is possible to tell, very closely, when the previous charge in
a given area has been dissolved in the bath (bubbling action) and
when the next charge in this area can be fed.  Operation of each
gun is controlled by a switch in easy reach of the operator.
     Certainly our green-feed smelters could follow practices and
construction similar to those employed by the Japanese with equal or
better results if efforts were to be directed towards this objective.
There has been no concentrated effort to raise reverberatory gas
strengths in U.S. smelters as even 2.5 percent would not allow economic
recovery by present means.  Upon recent questioning of responsible
supervisors at two Arizona smelters, it was stated that little atten-
tion was paid to reverberatory gas strength in their plants, but
they felt sure it varies between 1 and 3 percent under different
operating conditions.  In other instances, where only periodic
sampling of reverberatory furnace gases was done, the SCL content
was usually found to be in the 1 to 2 percent range so that treat-
ment was considered completely uneconomical.  As will be indicated
in the following discussions, the higher the S02 concentration,
the smaller the size generally required for any subsequent control
system.
                                 38

-------
2.4  CONVERTING
     Molten matte is processed in two or more Peirce-Smith Conver-
ters.  These converters are horizontal, cylindrical basic-lined ves-
sels, typically 13 feet in diameter and 30 to 32 feet long.  Flux
containing preferably 70 to 80 percent silica is added, and air is
blown into the matte through submerged tuyeres to oxidize the iron
and sulfur content of the matte.  The iron oxide formed combines
with the silica flux to produce an iron silica slag that is skimmed
off.  Molten temperatures of 2,100°to 2,200°F are maintained as a
result of the oxygen's reaction with iron and sulfur which is exo-
thermic.  Regular additions of cold copper bearing materials are
required to limit converting temperatures.  Further details are
given in Appendix H.
     All but 1 or 2 percent of the iron and a considerable portion
of the sulfur is oxidized prior to skimming off the iron silicate
slag, leaving a "white metal," about 70 percent copper and 24 per-
cent sulfur.  This is known as the slag blow which produces average
offgas S02 concentrations of 10 percent.  When collected by the
primary converter hood, this value will be diluted to 5 percent
average.  Further blowing converts most of the remaining sulfur to
SOp leaving a final blister copper usually containing about 98.5
to 99.3 percent copper, 0.3 percent sulfur, some dissolved oxygen,
and other impurities.  This is called the copper blow and can pro-
duce SOp concentrations in collected gases in the converter hood
in the range of 6 to 8 percent.  The blister may be further refined
in a reducing atmosphere and either cast into cakes for shipment
or into anodes for further electrolytic refining.
     It should be noted that the initial  impurity mix in the converter
will  determine to a great extent the blowing  time for the converter
operation.   If lead is an impurity,  for example,  a long  converter
blowing time is required.   This is accomplished  by producing a
low grade (high sulfur) matte from the reverberatory furnace.   This
indirectly can effect the weak SOp stream generation in  the furnace
as well  as  the operation of both the roasters  and the furnace.
                                 39

-------
2.5  CONVENTIONAL SULFURIC ACID PLANT PRACTICE
     Most domestic experience in S02 control  for copper smelters has been
with capture by conversion to sulfuric acid.   This is the most readily
available approach for S02 control  and has been used on S02 offgases
from roasters and converters for a  number of years.   Lean S0? offgases
(0.5 to 1.5 percent) from reverberatory furnaces, however, have rarely
been captured and usually are emitted directly to the atmosphere because
of the inability of a conventional  acid plant to economically process
this low concentration range.

2.5.1  SULFURIC ACID PLANT TECHNOLOGY
2.5.1.1  System
     The process for the manufacture of sulfuric acid from copper
smelter offgases consists of three principal steps; namely:
     • Purification of S02 gas from the smelter
     • Conversion of S02 gas to sulfur trioxide (SO.J gas
     • Absorption of SO,, in HpSO.
A schematic of a single or double contact (see section 2.5.1.3)  acid
plant is shown in Figure 2-8.

2.5.1.2  Conditioning of S02 Gas
     Smelter gas can normally contain combinations of S02, metallic
fume, dust, SO.,, and gaseous impurities.  The S02 gas stream entering
the acid plant must be clean and dry to minimize operational problems.
     The gas is usually cooled in passing through a waste heat boiler
or other heat exchanger sufficiently to enter a precipitator for major
particulate removal.  The gases then pass to a spray chamber or
cooling tower where water removes many of the remaining impurities and
further cools the gas.  Scrubber equipment has also been used for this
purpose.  The gas must be cooled to reduce its moisture content.  Final
cooled temperature  is determined by the S02 concentration, product acid
strength desired, cooling water temperature, and the elevation of the
plant above sea level.
                                 40

-------
                                                     u
                                                    •r—


                                                     to
                                                    -C
                                                     u
                                                     o
                                                    <

                                                     u
                                                    •r~
                                                     s_


                                                    <4-
                                                    ^—
                                                     3
                                                    •IJ
                                                     c
                                                     o
                                                    o
                                                    -Q

                                                     3

                                                     O
                                                    Q
                                                     C

                                                     (O
                                                     O)
                                                     en
                                                     c
                                                    00


                                                    CVJ


                                                     OJ


                                                     3
                                                     CT)
41

-------
     The water discharged from the spray chamber or cooling tower
will contain the impurities removed from the gas and will  also be
saturated with SC^ from the gas.   To recover sulfur values and re-
duce effluent nuisance, this water may be passed through a stripping
column where a stream of air removes most of the S0? from the water.
The S02 gas so recovered is fed back to the tower.   The water from
the stripping column then may be either neutralized or discharged.
     The gas leaving the cooling section is passed  through a mist
precipitator in which most of the remaining particles of acid mist,
metallic fume, and dust are removed by electrostatic precipitation.
Sulfuric acid mist generally contains particles less than 5 microns
and is very difficult to remove from the gas stream except with an
electrostatic precipitator.  If this mist is allowed to enter the
contact section of the acid plants,  it will  cause corrosion problems
in carbon steel ducts, heat exchangers, and the main blower.
     The usual mist precipitator is a tube type with vertical lead
tubes 6 to 10  inches in diameter.  High voltage discharge
electrodes are suspended in the center and run the  entire length
of the tubes.  The mist particles are attracted to  the tube walls,
flow downward,and are collected in the lower header in the form
of 5 to 10 percent HpSO,.  Two mist precipitators installed in
series can provide 99 percent removal efficiency.   There are two
two series of precipitator banks because the entrained acid in the
gas stream tends to produce arcing and requires a reduced input
voltage lowering the efficiency of the unit.  With  two units in series,
the voltage is reduced only to the first unit so the overall efficiency
is  affected only slightly.  In some cases, only one precipitator is
used to minimize capital expenditures with resulting lower efficiency.
     The  gas  passes from the mist precipitator to the drying tower where
it  moves  up  through a  bed  countercurrent to the flow of 93 percent acid.
The acid  absorbs the moisture  remaining with the gas which  is to a
maximum water  vapor content of 5 mg/scf.  The heat generated by the ab-
sorption  of  water  in the circulating acid is removed in heat exchangers
cooled with  water, reducing acid temperature to approximately 105°F.
                                 42

-------
     For high S02 to SO^ conversion efficiency,  the  converter
entrance gas should contain at least 1.3  volumes  of  oxygen  for
every volume of S02«  This ratio maximizes  the  gas strength out of the
converter and determines the required volume of gas  handled per ton
of sulfuric acid produced.  Introducing additional air to supply
oxygen may be necessary in cases where this ratio is not maintained.
     The main gas blower usually follows the drying  tower to provide
sufficient suction to pull the air required through  the purification
system and sufficient pressure to blow the gas  through the converter
heat exchanger system and the absorption tower.  Blower static
pressure capability is typically 150 in. w.c.
     The gas leaves the blower at about 130°F and flows through a
series of heat exchangers in which its temperature is raised to
820°F, the required temperature for entering the first catalyst
layer in the converter.
     The dry gas leaving the blower passes through the shell  side
of three (usually) shell and tube heat exchangers in series in which
its temperature is raised to 820°F.  In the cold heat exchanger,
the S02 gas is heated to approximately 480°F as it flows counter-
current to the SO, gas leaving the converter.  In the intermediate
exchanger, the S02 gas is further heated to about 555°F by cooling
the gas leaving the second bed of the converter.   Further heating
of the  $02  gas  to 820°F  is accomplished  in  the hot, or converter,
heat  exchanger  by cooling  the  partially  converted gas leaving the
first catalyst bed from about 1.075F to 820°F.   Suitable bypasses
are provided around these exchangers to permit  maintaining
optimum temperatures to the converter.

2.5.1.3  Conversion of $02 to $03
     The conversion of S02 to S03 takes place in the converter.
The converter contains several layers of a vanadium  pentoxide
catalyst, the purpose of which is to accelerate the  reaction
between S02 and oxygen to form SOg.  The converter is normally
                                 43

-------
of the three-stage four-bed type, designed to provide maximum
conversion efficiency.
     The heat of reaction generated in the first stage of conver-
sion where 70 to 75 percent of the SCL reacts with (L in the gas
stream is removed from the gas in the external converter heat
exchanger.  The temperature rise may be 250 F° to 300 F°.  The
rise in temperature reduces the conversion equilibrium.
     The partially converted gas, cooled to 830°F in the converter
heat exchanger, is returned to the second stage.  The heat of
reaction in the second catalyst bed is also removed in an external
intermediate exchanger.  Heat from the third and fourth beds is removed
in the external cold heat exchanger.
     An indirect air cooler can be used to reduce the SO, containing
gas temperature to 300°F to 350°F before going to the 98 percent sulfuric
acid recirculating over the absorption tower.  The heat rise in the
acid resulting from (1) the transfer of 93 percent acid, (2) heat of
absorption of SO- and  (3) from the sensible heat in the incoming gas,
is removed from the acid as it flows by gravity through the 98 percent
acid cooling heat exchangers to the pump tank.  The exchangers are
designed to reduce the acid temperature to 150°F.  A vertical submerged
pump recirculates the  98 percent acid over the absorption tower where
the SO, is absorbed to form produce 98 to 99 percent acid which is
then delivered to the  acid storage coolers or to the 93 percent acid
system for dilution.
     For heating the converter system, valved ductwork is pro-
vided from the blower  discharge to a heat source, either as a separate
gas-fired heater or from some other source in the plant.
     The double contact acid plant is the same as a single contact except
that the partially stripped gases at a higher SOp to SO., ratio are
again passed through a portion of the converter and a second absorption
tower.  With this approach, a 500 ppm SOp acid plant emission can be
guaranteed, as compared to 2,000 ppm for a single and double contact
sulfuric acid plant schematic.

                                 44

-------
     A clear discussion on some of the relative merits  between

single and double contact systems for metallurgical  plants  is
presented below from Reference 10.

     "High sulfur dioxide concentrations are advantageous  because
     they produce more acid for a given size plant.   However,  ox-
     ygen concentrations decrease as sulfur dioxide  concentrations
     increase, and the oxygen concentration has a  significant
     effect on catalyst performance and yield.   For  this  reason,
     optimum sulfur dioxide concentration in a  conventional  metal-
     lurgical type contact plant is approximately  7.0 to  7.5 per-
     cent by volume.   In the double contact or  "interpass  absorp-
     tion" type plants first developed by Bayer in Germany,  the
     optimum concentration is approximately 9.0 percent SO,
                                                         '2'
     However,  equipment must be added to handle this  stronger gas.

     As sulfur dioxide concentration decreases, smaller fractions
     of the reaction heat are available to preheat incoming cold
     gases.  At approximately 3.5 to 4.0 percent S02,  the acid
     plant is  thermally balanced and any lower concentrations re-
     quire the addition of external  heat.   The preheater provided
     for plant startup can be used for this purpose but its con-
     tinuous operation adds extra maintenance and fuel  costs to
     the cost of acid production.  It should also be  noted that
     heat exchanger sizes increase rapidly as sulfur  dioxide
     concentration decreases.  With  the double contact process,
     thermal balance occurs at approximately 6.0 to 7.0 percent
     S02 with  7.5 percent preferred  as a practical  lower limit.

     The conventional acid plant is  considered to be  a single
     contact (single absorption or single  catalysis)  process.
     This usually results in three passes  of the gas  through the
     converter with interstage cooling.   Vendors will  not guarantee
     any less  output from the sulfuric acid plant than 2,000 ppm
     with this system.  For vendors  to guarantee operation with
     S02 emissions at 500 ppm it is  necessary to go to the so-
     called double contact (double absorption or double catalysis)
     process where the main stream is brought out of  the converter
     loop and  a major portion of the SOs is removed from the gas
     in an intermediate absorption tower after a two  or three pass
     conversion.  The balance of the gas is returned  to the
     converter for a final one or two stages of conversion taking
     advantage of the kinetics to drive the S02 to 803 with a
     low initial concentration of 503."


     The difference between single contact and double contact plants as

far as additional equipment for the  latter is concerned includes the

absorption tower, additional heat exchangers and coolers, as well  as

                                  45

-------
pumps, valves, and dampers.   While there is  more equipment  in  a  double
contact plant, considering the kind of equipment and the  possiblity
of designing redundancy into the system, properly designed  plants
whether single or double contact should not  exhibit a difference
in reliability.  A properly designed plant is one that is specifi-
cally designed for potential problems and one that has backup  equip-
ment such as spare pumps, valves, and dampers, etc.  In many cases,
with proper circuitry, it is possible to arrange a system that will
allow bypassing of specific pieces of equipment.  This will prevent
plant shutdown while the equipment is replaced or repaired.  Design-
ing for recognized problems will add to the  initial capital cost of
the plant, but will be economical in terns of total maintenance cost
over the life of the plant.   The reliability of an absorption  tower,
where there are no moving parts, is extremely high.  Reliability of
rotating or moving machinery tends to be lower, therefore,  design
factors can be incorporated to compensate.  Thus, although there is
additional equipment, there should not be a  major difference in the
on-time between single and double contact.  This is particularly
evident if the system is designed to allow redundancy and minimum
maintenance.

2.5.1.4  Acid Plant Design Considerations
     High levels of solid or gaseous contaminants in smelter
offgases can present difficulties in the production of sulfuric
acid if not effectively removed prior to processing.  The major
problems caused by residual  quantities include plugging of the
catalyst beds with deactivation of the catalyst and possible con-
tamination of the product acid.  These problems, however, are
generally rectified by (1) the use of more efficient dust or mist
collectors, and (2) the scrubbing of the gases with liquids which
absorb the contaminants.  Likewise, annual repair of the equipment
and catalyst screening will  ensure proper acid plant performance.
     In some cases, contaminants may affect  the final acid prod-
uct by passing through the gas cleaning equipment and the catalyst.

                                 46

-------
One such condition is the so-called "black acid"  -- resulting from
various volatile organics bypassing both the gas  cleaning equipment
and the catalyst and being captured in the acid product.   This
situation is more common with multihearth roasters where  various
organics entrained with the concentrates are merely vaporized or
only partially decomposed.  However, within fluid-bed roasters,
these organic flotation agents are completely decomposed.  Thus,
sulfuric acid produced from these offgases is free of organic
contamination.    Nevertheless, there are outlets for sulfuric
acid which are not sensitive to color, such as the production of
fertilizers or alkylation processes at refineries.
     One additional  consideration for an economic functioning acid
plant is the oxygen content of the gases to be processed.  If the
oxygen content of these gases is not sufficient to convert SOg to
$03, then additional oxygen must be added to provide the  proper
ratio of oxygen to sulfur dioxide.  For single contact sulfuric
acid plants, this oxygen to sulfur dioxide ratio  should be at least
from 1.25 to 1.3.  Double contact acid plants require ratios  of
at least 1.18 to 1.22.12
                                47

-------
                            SECTION 3
                PROCESSING TECHNIQUE MODIFICATIONS
3.1  GENERAL
     There are processing techniques and variations that have
been used at various smelters affecting reverberatory furnace
SOp generation.  Some of these techniques are on an experimental
basis and some are under normal production conditions.  In general,
these techniques have not been primarily applied for SOo control
but rather to improve operating conditions (e.g., reduce mag-
netite formation) or to increase production.   However, the effects
have been to change the SO^ concentration in  the reverberatory
furnace offgases.
     After reviewing the possible approaches  to S02 control, it is
evident that an increase in concentration of SOp in the offgas is
desirable.  This tends to reduce the cost of processing equipment
such as FGD or concentration systems as well  as sulfuric acid
plants.  It is also desirable, in all cases,  to minimize the gas
volume leaving the furnace by reducing the infiltration of air
through elimination or reduction of leakage points in the gas handling
system.  This minimizes initial and operating costs of the gas hand-
ling equipment.  (There are, however, several exceptions, as discussed
in Section 3.6.)

     Sulfur dioxide control  from the reverberatory furnace can
be facilitated by  the  following processing techniques related to
operation of  the smelter.
     •   Pressure (draft) control
     •   Elimination  of converter  slag  return

                                48

-------
     •    Sealing all leakage points to reduce infiltration air
     •    Preheat air supplied to the furnace
     •    Preliminary processing of charge using a fluid-bed roaster
     •    Operation at lower air-to-fuel ratio
     •    Instrumental control of reverberatory smelting to
          stabilize operations
     •    Oxygen enrichment
     •    Predrying wet charge
     •    Continuous furnace charging
     •    Elimination of reverberatory furnace
     •    Converter scheduling and hooding
     •    Blending
These techniques are discussed in subsequent subsections.
     It should be emphasized (see Section 5.0) that each technique
will be applicable only under certain conditions depending upon
the site specific operations and economic factors and these con-
ditions can change with time for any given smelter.  Furthermore,
these techniques have been and currently are being used within
the industry, not necessarily on a general basis or specific to
aid in weak SOo stream control.

3.2  ELIMINATION OF CONVERTER SLAG RETURN
     Converter slag is returned to the reverberatory furnace
through the converter slag return launder.  This may be a simple
channel with an opening in the furnace wall.  It can also be a
mechanically operated chute that is inserted through an opening
normally covered by a mechanically activated door.
     Fifty or more ladles of converter slag can be returned in a
24-hour period.  This depends upon the number of converters and
the operating level of the smelter.
     Each time the slag is returned, a large amount of air enters
the furnace for a minimum of 5 minutes and tends to reduce S02
concentrations.  Conversely, the agitation in the bath and increased

                                 49

-------
chemical  reactions with the slag constituents tend to increase SC^
emissions.  However, the overall effect is to reduce average S02
concentrations.  Consideration should be given to cutting back on
primary burner air or using compensating pressure control system
operation to minimize fluctuations.
     At the very least, converter slag return increases the volume
of reverberatory furnace offgas.  In some cases, the slag return
opening may not be closed at any time, further compounding the
S02 control problem.  Of course, the mechanically activated door
and chute technique will minimize infiltration as long as main-
tenance problems do not become overwhelming.
     More and more smelters are weighing the economic advan-
tages and disadvantages of returning converter slag to the
reverberatories.  For those smelters plagued by magnetite and
its buildup in furnace bottoms or hearths and copper entrainment
in furnace slag, the elimination of the magnetite source in the
converter slag has resulted in much improved furnace conditions.
Generally some smelters  using green feed have been able to
practice magnetite control in the furnaces and still prefer the
return of hot converter slag to the furnaces.  The advantages
and disadvantages of converter slag return are listed in Appendix
I.
     It has been firmly established in many experiments, e.g.,
Appendix D and Reference 14, and by the many plants treating
converter slag by flotation techniques, that the slag must first
be slow-cooled.  The formation of crypto-crystalline or ultra
microstructures that are too small to separate mechanically for
subsequent flotation processes is thus avoided.  The larger
particles, which are essentially "grown" on a nucleus, are much
more amenable to the flotation process for copper recovery when
slow-cooling is  practiced.  The proper length of time required
for slow-cooling is somewhat conjectural, but 24 hours is min-
imal.  However, a proper mean is probably from 1 to 2 or more
days.
                                  50

-------
     A content of 3 to 6 percent copper in the original  converter
slag usually results in a copper flotation tailings loss of 0.3
to 0.4 percent.  The copper reclaimed from the slag is in the
form of a concentrate, which usually contains 20 percent or more
copper.  This is then returned to the furnace charge or pelletized
and  smelted  in  the  converter  vessels.  The copper  lost  in  the
tailings is generally in the form of compounds in oxide or silicate
form.  If economical, they could, however, be leached from the
tailings by sulfuric acid treatment followed by precipitation
with iron scrap.
     Slag magnetite content as high as 53 percent has been
determined although this figure is normally 17 to 35 percent in
various smelters.  After flotation treatment, the concentrate
usually contains nearly 5 percent magnetite.   The balance is
passed into the waste tailings and eliminated.
     Within economic limits, grinding of slags is desirable for
proper separation of mineral sulfides.  Grinding to at least 85
percent minus 200 mesh is not uncommon.
     Most flotation treatment of converter slags is done within
a circuit separate from ore treatment because of different reagents
and techniques required, although a few plants simply add the
slag to the incoming ore at the concentrator crusher without
noticable detrimental effects.  Much of the difference is due to
the various flotation circuits used for treating ores in a
specific location.

3.3  SEALING LEAKAGE POINTS
     To decrease  the volume of exit gases and raise the S02 con-
centration, it  is always desirable to seal reverberatory furnaces
as much as is needed to eliminate air infiltration  over
the quantities required for good furnace operation.  Because
there has not been any great need for extensive sealing in re-
verberatory furnaces in the U.S., in many cases, a large effective

                                  51

-------
open area is available for air to enter.   There are  some furnaces
that have the walls built with gaps between the bricks so great
that the fire can be seen through the wall.  To eliminate excess
air infiltration and thereby decrease volume of exit gases and
raise their temperature, it is always desirable to seal  rever-
beratories as much as possible.  While infiltration  air into the furnace
itself can be used for refractory cooling and oxygen addition, sealing
of uptakes, waste heat boilers and downstream ductwork is mandatory
for efficient, minimum cost, S02 control.
     The most extensive work performed to seal reverberatory
furnaces specifically to facilitate S02 control has  been con-
ducted at the Onahama smelter in Japan.  A direct quotation
from Reference 15 clearly indicates the possiblities for the
use of this technique as follows:  "Air infiltration into the
offgas, which had amounted to approximately 50 percent of the
furnace exit gas at the uptake, was reduced to less  than 15 per-
cent by eliminating air leaks through crevices, clearances and
openings of the furnace roof, sidewalls, fettling chutes, damper
slots, expansion joints, peep holes, cleaning doors  and especially
dust discharging hoppers of the boilers and the Cottrell treaters."
     Converter slag return, use of charge slingers or Wagstaff-
type feeders, and slurrying repair of furnaces all contribute to
excess air infiltration by requiring intermittent large openings.
Infiltration of air around burners can be another bad offender
when furnace pressure is not carefully monitored and regulated.
Open cracks in refractory arches and sidewalls should be sealed
as they develop.
     At Onahama, the major leakage points in the reverberatory
furnaces are at the two slag doors, the charge ports, the burner
entry (eight burners), cracks, the oxy-fuel burner ports and the
bath  measuring ports.  It is necessary to repair and replace
portions of the furnace roof every 6 months to minimize leakage.
This is particularly true within an area of approximately 10
meters long from the burner end.
                                  52

-------
     The slinger charge system at Ajo tends to increase dilution
because there is a fairly large door opening required.  They have
at times also cutoff the burners during charging in order to min-
inimize furnace qas dilution.
     Slag return launders are generally near the furnace end.
Also, it is possible to minimize the amount of infiltration air
by mechanically closing the door while mechanically moving the
slag return launder in and out.   This is done at the new Morenci
furnace.
     In terms of space allowed between bricks, there has been as
much as 100 mm (4 in) expansion allowed in 9 m (30 ft) length.
When hot, the refractories theoretically expand and seal these
openings.  Proper maintenance is the major factor for minimizing
leaks or infiltration air.  Hand sealing of all cracks between
refractories should be routinely practiced.  With a silica arch,
it is possible to spray on a repair, but the basic material  cannot
be patched in this manner.
     Extensive sealing will,  as mentioned,  eliminate  the  cooling
effect of infiltration air.   The furnace must then be operated
in such a way that overheating will  not occur.  In some cases
it may be necessary to use a different refractory material or
readjust burner location and operation.
     Additional  techniques to minimize air infiltration include
straight through boiler design with air-sealed mechanized ash
pit dust removal  facilities, the use of permanently mounted steam
soot blowers in boilers and flue systems (instead of hand lancing),
and additional burners at strategic points in the flue system to
melt accretions (instead of opening doors for hand cleanout).
Periodic maintenance sealing of flues, precipitators, and treatment
facilities is also required to prevent dilution of the S02 after
passing through the furnace waste heat boilers and before it can
be processed.
                                  53

-------
3.4  PRESSURE CONTROL
     The general  objective in the operation of the reverberatory
furnace is to maintain a slight negative pressure (0.005 to 0.050
in.of water) throughout the furnace.  This prevents gases from
escaping through any openings and also brings in cooling air to
reduce brick and metal temperatures at critical  points.   Of course,
the lower the pressure, the greater will be the  amount of air entering,
resulting in greater fuel  requirements with more S02 dilution.
     It is common practice to use butterfly dampers in the ductwork
downstream of the wasteheat boilers to automatically control  the
pressure in the reverberatory furnace.  The butterfly type is more
common although some sliding dampers are used.
     Normally when charging occurs there is only one, or possibly
two, charge pipes open at a time so that the pressure surge that
accompanies the charging tends to be dampened out by the mass of
gas within the system.  Thus, high response pressure control  systems
have not been used.  Draft controls normally have antihunting devices
on them.
     The operation that causes the greatest pressure fluctuation is
the slag return and the slag return launder opening.  The slag reacts
with the molten material causing a more rapid gas evolution tending
to increase pressure.  The slag return opening tends to allow a
major quantity of infiltration air to enter.  Some smelters use this
infiltration air to help cool the arch.
     In the wet charge reverberatory where sloughing occurs from the
charge banks, generation of gas can occur so  rapidly that the relief
openings are not sufficent to relieve the pressure.  There have been
occasions when the arch was blown off the furnace.
     At Onahama, pressure control is set by a sensor just before the
uptake which is connected to a damper downstream of the boiler.  The
control pressure is reset every week or so by observation of leakage
out of the roof.  Figure 3-1 shows the variation of pressure versus
the length in the furnace.  It indicates the  potential for positive
                                  54

-------
 pressure at some points in the furnace even though most areas are
 negative.  Location and maintenance of pressure sensors are of prime
 importance particularly since the peak pressure point may shift as
 furnace operating conditions change.
      Close attention to the pressure  setting can help minimize dilution
 air.   It is effective regardless  of the existing effective open area.
              CHARGE DROP POINTS
BURNERS (8)--
                   REVERBERATORY FURNACE
                                                             ATMOSPHERIC
                                                                "PRESSURE
           Figure 3-1.  Pressure Variation Along Centerline
           of the Reverberatory Furnace at Onahama Smelter
 3.5  PREHEATED AIR
      Preheating furnace air can reduce the amount of additional
 burner energy required in the furnace with consequent reduction
 in nitrogen if indirect heating is used.  This will reduce the
 amount of combustion-related gas and should, therefore, increase
 S02 concentration.  Air is preheated to 400°C at the Onahama
 smelter and a 6 percent increase in S02 concentration results.
      As indicated in Reference 16, using preheated air for natural
 gas combustion is usually required to increase flame temperatures
                  »
 thereby increasing heat transfer to the melt by radiation and
                                    55

-------
convection.   The use of preheated air for burning oils and pulver-
ized coal accomplishes the same thing but can introduce furnace
durability and control problems because of the higher temperatures
encountered.   Also, according to the above reference, fuel can be
burned in a preheater with greater efficiency than in the furnace
because of the much lower temperatures of waste combustion gases in
the preheating operation.
     Preheating air is common practice in the industry primarily for
efficiency reasons.  It is not expected that preheating will  be used
with oxygen enrichment (Section 3.9) because of the reduction of
combustion air.

3.6  PRELIMINARY PROCESSING USING FLUID-BED ROASTERS
     There are two exceptions to the general rule that the S02
concentration should be increased to facilitate its control.
Assuming that all efforts have been made to reduce gas volume, the
two approaches that make it desirable to reduce SOo concentrations
are:
     1.  Neutralization forming a waste or throwaway  product
     2.  No control
     In  the case of neutralization  using for example, the lime/
limestone gypsum system  as presently practiced at the Onahama
smelter  reverberatory  furnace  in Japan  (Section 5.2), the lower
the quantity  of SCk  generated  the  less  will  be the  input material
lime or  limestone  required and the  less will  be  the  output gypsum
to be  handled and  "thrown-away."   In  the  case  of no  control,  it is
conceivable that if a  small  enough  quantity  of S02  is generated
in the reverberatory  furnace,  it can  be emitted  and  still allow the
smelter  to meet its ambient  air  quality requirements.
     The one  technique that  results in  reduced SCL  from  the
reverberatory furnace without  introducing  additional  pollution
control  problems in  other  portions  of  the  smelter  is  the
use of fluid-bed roasters.   The fluid-bed  roaster  produces an
                                  56

-------
offgas stream in the 8 to 18 percent SC^ range and, by its nature,
is usually a very well-sealed device with minimum fugitive emis-
sions.  This high S02 concentration can be readily controlled by
separate processes.
     It appears from the data in Reference 17 that reduced sulfur
emissions from the reverberatory furnace result when a fluid-bed
roaster is used for initial processing of the charge.  The roaster
allows the free atom of sulfur attached to the iron to be driven
off easily.  In addition, some of the combined sulfur is burned,
iron is oxidized and heat is produced in the calcine which reduces
the amount of fuel necessary in the reverberatory furnace to
maintain temperature.  The fraction of sulfur removed in the
roaster depends on the composition of the ore, and the operating
temperature of the roaster.  To make matte with the chalcopyrite,
the most sulfur that can be taken in the roaster is approximately
40 percent.  With chalcocite it is possible to go to a complete
dead roast, but this  ore is not generally encountered in the
United States to as great an extent as the chalcopyrite.
     If green charge of good concentrate grade is used, matte
grades between 30 and 36 percent result from the reverberatory
furnace.  This could be too low a grade, in many cases, to go to
the converters.   Ideal matte grade is 42 to 46 percent.  Most
plants add roasters because of very low concentrate grade or
custom materials of varying grades and impurity levels.
     The nature of the smelter feed and the economics involved
are the prime considerations for determining whether the charge
should be preroasted.  The desired grade of matte is regulated
by converter capacity and costs.  The median copper range is
between 40 to 45 percent.
     When feed contains excess sulfur beyond the matte require-
ments, it is either necessary to remove excess sulfur by roasting
or to add sufficiently to the converter capacity to treat the
lower grade of matte that will be produced.  The final decision

                                 57

-------
depends upon the balance between the cost of roasting and the
cost of converting.
     The other factor that determines whether roasting is desirable
is the possible need for production of sulfuric acid from roaster
gases.  This was the case in one Arizona smelter some years ago
when a need for acid arose for a concentrator leach-precipitate-
float treament.  It was decided to install a fluid-bed roaster
to make the partial roast on a portion of the smelter feed in
order to produce high strength S02 to satisfy the acid require-
ment.  Other reasons were to provide a rich SCL stream for direct
acid plant processing to produce acid for emission control.

     As high as 15 to 18 percent SCL concentration in the gas
from fluid-bed roasters has been obtained, although in most cases
8 to 10 percent is normally achieved.   This is ideal  for making
acid particularly since the roaster operates under continuous
steady-state conditions required to feed the acid plant.
Kennecott/Hayden converted to roasters to make acid in order to
leach their silicate ore body.   ASARCO aims for 42 percent matte
so that some secondaries can be handled in the converters.  An-
other advantage for roasting is that with calcine feed into the
furnace, fuel consumption and gas volume are reduced by approx-
imately 30 to 40 percent, as compared to green feed.   This is
due primarily to the preheating energy introduced into the
furnace by the hot calcine.  In addition, from 6 to 11 percent of
the concentrate is water.  This, of course, is removed in the
roaster, although this could be a disadvantage if the water is
required in a subsequent SOp control system (refer to Section 5.0).

     While it appears that the  current philosophy in  the  copper
industry is to use fluid-bed roasters, some circumstances exist
that will  not allow their use.   Sufficient grinding is needed to
liberate values.   However,  with underground ores where mining results
commonly in large pieces compared to smaller sizes for open pit, it
is sometimes necessary to reduce the size so much that the grinding

                                  58

-------
cost would be excessive.  In rare cases ores are directly smelted
without concentrating.  Ores with a 4-1/2 percent copper reduction
have been directly smelted without concentrating.  There may also be
an increase in magnetite formation depending upon the composition of
the charge.   A low grade matte (more easily controlled with multi-
hearth roasters) may be required for subsequent converter lead
elimination.
     The use of fluid-bed roasters may be undesirable when arseno-
pyrites are present.  Antimony, bismuth, and selenium may also
cause problems.  These impurities are relatively difficult to
separate by volatilization, and a fluid-bed roaster may not provide
sufficient residence time for complete separation.   Multi-
hearth roasters, on the other hand, provide a much  longer residence
time as the ore travels through each hearth - up to 11 in all.
Experience has shown, however, that bismuth is not  usually a
problem in U.S. smelters, and arsenic and antimony, if present
in the product, can be removed in the anode furnace.   Anaconda,
processes ores containing nearly 1 percent arsenic with a fluid-
bed roaster.  Furthermore, multihearth roasters tend to produce
greater fugitive emissions.
     If residence time is a problem, it is possible to use a
three-stage fluid-bed roaster.  The first stage is  the drying
stage which could be fluid-bed drying or any other  drying device
such as a rotary kiln.  This would then be followed by two stages:
one with an oxidizing atmosphere and another with a neutral or
reducing atmosphere.  Lurgi apparently does this with arsenopy-
                                                             1 g
rite.  Also, this technique was used for gold ore processing.

3.7  OPERATION AT LOWER AIR-TO-FUEL RATIO
     The quantities of primary and secondary air allowed to mix
with fuel in burners can control gas temperature and gas com-
bustion to a limited extent.  If the amount of carbon, sulfur,
and hydrogen in the fuel is combined with the exact amount of
                                  59

-------
oxygen to complete their combustion to CO-,  H?0, and S0?,  then
the theoretical amount has been supplied.   Usually,  for most com-
mon combustion devices, an excess of oxygen is used  to ensure
efficient fuel useage.
     The point of efficient (most economical) combustion has
been passed when the heat lost to the dry gases from the additional
air (supplying the oxygen) exceeds the heat gained from the com-
bustion of any additional fuel.  As gas is easily mixed with air,
it is the easiest fuel with which to obtain complete combustion.
Commercial burners are available which can operate with 0 to 10
percent excess air, still obtaining complete combustion.  Liquid
fuels are less easily mixed with air, so1 they require up to
18 percent excess air.  Solid fuels require from 12 to 50 percent
excess air and sometimes leave unburned carbon in the ash residue.
With a given amount of sulfur oxidized in the furnace, the S02
concentration will increase as oxygen (air) is reduced.  The air is
supplied by burner primary and secondary air and air infiltration
through the various leakage points (Section 3.3).  The burner design
and its burning efficiency will govern the amount of excess air
required introducing a counter-balancing effect.
    It is indicated by the analysis of the furnace operation at
Onahama (Appendices E and F) that underfiring or operating at less
than theoretical air at the burner end of the furnace and operating
overall with no more than 10 percent excess air  (not considering
iron oxidation) can increase the S02 concentration.   While green
charge furnaces are emitting 1.5 percent S0? average in the U.S.,
the Onahama smelter, emits 2.6 percent S02 average.   The effects of
the additional sealing efforts at Onahama, of course, also promote
the higher value.
    It is known that the Onahama furnace designer intended for
the furnace to operate more fuel rich than normal U.S. practice.
While this does not provide a maximum heat release in the furnace,
in addition to high SOp concentration, it does increase furnace
durability and also reduced NO  formation.  Originally, 500 ppm  NO
                              A                                   A
                                 60

-------
 resulted when operating on the oxygen-rich side.   When the air-fuel
 ratio was reduced to the fuel-rich side, the NO  dropped to 100 ppm.
                                                /\
     One possible side effect of more fuel-rich operation may be the
 distillation of sulfur which does not encounter oxygen in the
 furnace.  The distilled sulfur acts like cement when combined
 with the dust and can cause flue plugging and possible precipitator
                    19
 operating problems.
 3.8  INSTRUMENTAL CONTROL OF REVERBERATORY SMELTING
     The fact that copper smelting is an art and not a complete
science has been firmly established through the years.  Never-
theless, partial control by computer is entirely possible for
about 90 percent of the process and is feasible if human judgement
is retained.  With the advances in sensing and measuring instru-
mentation in recent years, it is desirable that these be employed
                                                          20
as far as possible to level out reverberatory operations.
     Of particular importance is the monitoring of temperatures
and gas composition throughout the furnace; maintenance of constant
draft conditions through activated multiple dampers; automatic
but also controlled charging, as needed, along furnace smelting
areas; monitoring of bath depth throughout the furnace; complete
combustion analysis of furnace gases at different points in the
furnace and at outlet; fettling of bridge wall and front end of
furnace as needed; and visual monitoring of furnace interior,
thereby allowing the human judgement factor when required.   Proper
use of instrumentation will dictate the need for specific furnace
sealing, burner adjustment (including flame length and direction),
rate of charging in certain areas, need for fettling, patching,
flux additions, oxygen balance, etc.  Prime drawback to instru-
mental use for full control is inability to instantly analyze
matte, slag, and gases, as well as to determine weights  and
measure flows.  Most smelters use some instrumentation and auto-
matic controls.  However, time response and system maintenance
varies from smelter to smelter.
                                  61

-------
     A more constant operation of the reverberatory furnace can
contribute to lower operating costs, as well  as more stable and
high SOp concentrations.

3.9  OXYGEN ENRICHMENT
3.9.1  INTRODUCTION
     Conventional air-fuel burners cannot match the efficiency
of oxygen-fuel combustion.  The air used in conventional  burners
is four-fifths nitrogen, which does not contribute to the com-
bustion process.   Nitrogen robs the flame of heat that could in-
crease production.  Nitrogen not only chills the flame, but also
                                                  21
vents useful heat to the stack.  Saddington et al    report that
about 45 percent of the gross thermal input in an air-fuel fired
reverberatory furnace leaves as sensible heat in the nitrogen.
The amount of heat carried away by each ton of nitrogen is of the
same magnitude as that required to smelt 1 ton of solid charge.
Oxygen-enriched fuel combustion increases furnace efficiency,
flame temperature, and flame propagation over air-fuel.  Immediate
fuel savings are an obvious advantage.  But oxygen usage may also
allow a smaller furnace to do the same job, or the same furnace
to do more work because convective heat transfer efficiency is
increased.  Higher heat and flame temperature also increase
process reaction rates, or reduce melt-down time.
     Oxygen has been used for a number of years to markedly in-
tensify metallurgical processes.  It has been accepted and used
in converters in the nonferrous smelting industry.  But the in-
dustry in the U.S. seems hesitant to use oxygen in reverberatory
furnaces even though it has been proven elsewhere that it would
increase production, and decrease fuel consumption.  An additional
effect found to result from oxygen enrichment was an increased S0?
concentration in the flue gases.  As a result of increasing fuel
costs, the present trend is toward optimizing fuel usage.
                                  62

-------
     While most of the work on oxygen enrichment to date has been
done to achieve increased production, an increase in SO^ concen-
tration has been demonstrated, in the flue gas stream.

     It should be noted that the extent of the increase in SCL
concentration will be dependent upon several factors including
furnace feed, chemical constituents, extent of preprocessing,
dilution air and general operating conditions.  The furnace charge
composition can determine the availability of sulfur for S02
formation under furnace operating conditions as discussed in
Section 2.3.3.3. This can then set the level of effectiveness of
the oxygen enrichment technique.
     The advantages of oxygen enrichment in a reverberatory
                                                 21 -78
furnace have been emphasized by numerous authors.  ~    The most
extensive  gain  in SCL concentration was obtained with a green
charge reverberatory furnace in Chile where values as high as
5 percent were  attained.  The basic principle involved in oxygen
enrichment is to decrease the quantity of nitrogen.  The nitrogen
is  inert and consumes energy which cannot be utilized in the
smelting process.  The oxygen in a reverberatory furnace is used
for combustion  and metallurgical processing.  Each of these act-
ivities are discussed in detail  in succeeding paragraphs.

3.9.2  OXYGEN UTILIZATION IN A REVERBERATORY FURNACE
     Various methods of oxygen introduction to the reverberatory
furnace have been used to date.  They are as follows:
     1.    Oxygen-fuel burners - oxygen is introduced directly
          with  fuel in separate burners.
     2.    Oxygen mixed with primary or secondary air and intro-
           duced into the existing burner system.
     3.    Undershooting the flame with oxygen or oxygen-enriched
           air.
     4.    Oxygen lancing of the molten charge.
              22          23
Itakura et al    and Goto    report  using oxygen-fuel burners
                                 63

-------
that penetrate the furnace roof vertically at the Onahama Smelter
                              24
and Refinery.  Eastwood et al    report using oxygen-enriched
primary air in the burners at the Rokana Smelter.  Pluzhnikov et
   25
al    report oxygen-enrichment of primary air in burners at
                                              26
NoriVsk Ore-Mining Combine.  Kupryakov et al    report using
oxygen-enriched primary air in burners at the Almalyk Copper
                           07
Smelter.  Saddington et al    report using oxygen-enrichment in
combustion air at INCO  Smelting  for  copper-nickel  ore.   Wrampe  et
   28
al    report Linde's experience with oxygen-enrichment of com-
bustion air in reverberatory furnaces at U.S. smelters.  Beals
      29
et al    have a  patent assigned to Kennecott for using oxygen
lancing of the melt to increase production and to obtain high
SCL concentration in the flue gases.  Further discussion on oxygen
injection techniques is included in Section 3.9.3.
                    •3Q
     Zhuravlev et al    report the effect of fuel  rate and oxygen-
enrichment on thermal  absorption into the charge.  The thermal
absorption along the length of the reverberatory furnace is shown
in Figure 3-2 for the  conditions of (1)  normal  operation (no
oxygen addition), (2)  increased fuel  rate (no oxygen addition),
and (3) oxygen-enrichment (normal fuel  rate).

    The combustion process is based on  two mechanisms - heat
transfer and mass transfer.  Heat has to be transferred to the fuel
to vaporize fuel (assuming oil) which then combines with oxygen.
If the mixture is held at or above the ignition temperature, the
mixture is ignited.   So, in order for this process to function
properly, there should be enough heat for the fuel to vaporize or
gasify, enough oxygen  to diffuse and combine with the fuel vapor,
and the mixture should be maintained at or above the ignition
temperature.
                                       31
    From the results of Zhuravlev et al   , it is seen that when the
fuel  rate is increased in a regular burner, the flame length in-
creases and the flame  temperature is reduced near the burner end
although it increases  in the latter part of the flame.  Because

                                 64

-------
                                           O)
                                           o
                                           03
                                           C   TJ
                                           S_    C
                                  UJ
                                  o
                                  ce
                                  o
                                  ce~.
                                  UJ
                                  CQ
                                  Di
                                  o:

                                  u_
                                  o
                                           S-
                                           o
                                           S_
                                           O)
                                           S-
                                           Ol
                                           0)
                                           o:
                                           O)
4-
 o
                                                 
                                                 c   c:
                                                i—i   OJ
                                           ^:    to
                                           +J    c
                                           01   o
                                           c   -i-
                                           d)   -4->
T)
 c:
 o
o

 c
 o
•r-
-(->
 (O
 S-
 a>
 a.
o
                                                      o
           s-
           c
           c
           (L)
           CD
 Q.
 S-
 O
 if)
                                            01
                                           CVJ


                                           CO


                                            
                                            S-
                                            3
                                            O)


                                           LL.
                                                 (O
                                                 S-
                                                 o
65

-------
of the larger volume of fuel involved, the mixture of fuel and
air is fuel-rich and oxygen diffusion is limited in the first part
of the burner.  This results in a lesser quantity of fuel burning
near the burner with a reduced heat release in this area.  A large
portion of the heat evolved is used in vaporizing the fuel, and
little heat is available to maintain the mixture at ignition tem-
perature, thereby decreasing the burning rate.  By the time the
flame travels a small distance into the furnace, most of the fuel
is vaporized.  Then, there is an adequate mixture of fuel and air
so that the flame is no longer diffusion limited.  Since there is
a large amount of fuel present, once the combustion starts, and
the flame fis no longer diffusion limited, a large amount of heat
is released and the temperature of the flame increases rapidly.
This continues until all the fuel has been used.
     The temperature of the flue gas leaving the furnace increases
with an increase in fuel  rate (if in excess of charge requirements),
thereby more and more sensible heat is lost in the flue gas result-
ing in higher specific fuel consumption.   Specific fuel  consump-
tion is defined as heat (BTU) of fuel  required to smelt a ton of
charge in the reverberatory furnace.  With an increase in fuel
rate, even though the flame temperature near the burner end is
decreased, the heat absorption increases in this section due to
the longitudinal radiation.  The heat transfer rate to the feed
also increases with increasing fuel rate, due to the overall in-
crease in the furnace temperature.
     When combustion air is enriched with oxygen, the flame length
decreases, the flame temperature is higher near the burner end,
and the furnace temperature tends to increase.  After enriching
the combustion air with oxygen, the flame in the first part of the
furnace is not oxygen diffusion limited as in the case of increased
fuel rate, it is only heat transfer limited.  Once the fuel starts
burning, enough heat is generated to vaporize the fuel and maintain
the fuel oxygen mixture at ignition temperature.  Since the flame
is not oxygen diffusion limited, the fuel ignites faster, and the
                                 66

-------
burning process is escalated producing high temperatures.  The
flame length decreases because all the fuel is burned in a short
time due to higher oxygen diffusivity and better heat transfer.
Owing to the decreased inert nitrogen concentration in the furnace
air, for a given quantity of fuel burned, the furnace air can be
heated to higher temperatures when combustion air is enriched with
oxygen.  Furthermore, while the fuel burns faster, a greater amount
of disassociation occurs keeping maximum temperatures low as well
as maintaining temperature for a longer length of time due to
                                op
reassociation (see Figure 3-7).
     From a heat transfer point of view, having higher flame temp-
eratures at the burner end is very desirable because (1) this will
increase the thermal absorption, and (2) maximum quantity of heat
will be absorbed before the gases leave the furnace, thereby op-
timizing the fuel  usage.
     Chizhikov reports that the smelting process is not chemical
reaction limited, but it is heat transfer limited.  The objective
                                                             33
is to have maximum heat transfer to the feed at minimun cost.
Both higher fuel rates and/or oxygen-enrichment would give higher
heat transfer rates to the feed.  With higher fuel rates since
the flame temperature is very high in the latter part, the furnace
gas temperature is increased in this section increasing the heat
transfer due to conduction and convection.  Also the higher flame
temperature with its higher emissivity increases the radiant heat
transfer.
     The flame is  shortened with oxygen-enrichment, and since all
the fuel is burned in a shorter time, the furnace gas temperatures
increase.  This increase in furnace gas temperature increases the
heat transfer to the feed by conduction and convection.  The in-
creased flame temperatures also increase the radiant heat transfer.
Since most of the heat in a reverberatory furnace is required in
the earlier stages of the furnace where the cold charge has to
be melted and maintained at a sufficient temperature for the
chemical reactions to occur, it is very desirable to have flame
                                 67

-------
characteristics similar to that obtained with oxygen-enrichment.
In the latter parts of the furnace, the furnace gases only have
to be maintained at a high enough temperature to assure that
the matte and slag remain molten at a sufficient temperature to
facilitate separation.
                  34
     Wrampe et al    report that higher furnace operating temp-
eratures might create a slag handling problem due to its decreased
viscosity.  However, this can be alleviated by an appropriate ad-
dition of silica flux in the feed.
                 35
     Seals et al    report using oxygen in a reverberatory furnace
to increase production by using oxygen-riched air for bath agitation
by lancing the bath.  The benefits of using this method are:
better heat transfer to the fresh feed piles by the splashed
molten material (conduction), radiant heat transfer from the
molten material splashed on the furnace walls, and direct transfer
to both matte and slag by the splashing thereof into the combustion
flame and gases.
          o/r
     Goto   points out that a somewhat different  heat  transfer  mech-
anism occurs  using separate oxygen-fuel burners that direct  the
flame on the charge banks in the Onahama  furnace.   The purpose
for using the  burners was to take advantage of the release of heat
when CCk and hLO are  reassociated.   The dissociation of these
molecules in the 2,000° to 2,900°C temperature range absorbs heat
which is released when gases are cooled.   By applying the flame
directly to or near the charge piles in the reverberatory furnace,
the reassociation heat which is  released  is applied directly to
the material  to be smelted.   The heat of  dissociation consumed by
the dissociation of C02 and hUO account for approximately one-half
of the total  calorific value of pure oil.   When the flame comes in
contact with low temperature material, the reaction heat is released
by reformation of CO^ and HUO.   The rapid smelting of concentrate
is possible because of direct application of the flame to charged
material banks.  It is believed that this method of oxygen utili-

                                  68

-------
zation is more efficient than simple oxygen-enri.chment of com-
bustion air.  However, improper application could cause serious
adverse effects on thermal efficiency.

3.9.3  METHOD OF OXYGEN INTRODUCTION TO THE FURNACE
     To date, various methods of introducing oxygen to the furnace
have been successfully tested.  These include oxygen-rich air
lancing of the bath, oxygen-fuel burners that penetrate the furnace
roof and are directed towards the charge banks, use of oxygen jets
next to the regular burners, undershooting of the flames with
oxygen, using oxygen lances across the furnace just above the bath,
and enriching the primary combustion air with oxygen, etc.  Sketches
of these methods of oxygen introduction in a reverberatory furnace
are given in Figures 3-3a through 3-3f.
     According to experts in oxygen application in furnaces,  enrichment
of primary combustion air with oxygen is perhaps the easiest  method of
introducing oxygen in the reverberatory furnace, but it is also the
least effective way of utilizing oxygen.  Oxygen utilization  can be
improved by undershooting the flame with oxygen, but this  method is
difficult to control.   Perhaps one of the best methods of  oxygen util-
ization in a reverberatory furnace is the use of oxygen-fuel  burners,
such as those used at Onahama.  They are easier to control and utilize
the oxygen very efficiently.   Further expansion of this technique was
used at the Caletones smelter in Chile where all fuel  was  burned with
pure oxygen in oxygen-fuel  burners.
     The fraction of heat input into the reverberatory furnace which is
absorbed by the charge in a normal  operation without oxygen-enrichment
is approximately 25 percent.   With the oxygen-enrichment of primary com-
bustion air or undershooting of the flame with oxygen, the fraction of
heat utilized for actual  smelting is increased to nearly 30 to 40 percent.
When oxygen-fuel burners are utilized in a reverberatory furnace, the
heat utilization for smelting is considerably higher.   This is
caused by disassociation and reassociation effects.  This  method has
been extended at the Caletones smelter to include total fuel  injection
                                  69

-------
               Figure 3-3a.  Oxygen  Lancing of the  Bath (Ref.  29)
                                                                                    Charge
                                                                                    Banks
                   I
                                             l^_—Oxy-Fuel-
                                             j^    Burners
                                                                                    Charge
                                                                                    Banks
               Figure 3-3b.  Oxygen-Fuel  Burner Usage in the  Furnace (Ref.  25,36, and 37)
Fuel Burners
 Oxygen Jets

              Figure 3-3c.  Use of Oxygen Jet Next to Burners  (Ref. 24)
                                                                                    Fuel
                                                                                    Burners

                                                                                    Oxygen Jets
                                                                                    Fuel Burners
                                                                                    Oxygen Jets
Undershooting  of     Figure 3-3d.  Undershooting the Flame with Oxygen (Ref. 21)
Flame with Oxygen


      Oxygen  Introduction to the Primary Combustion Air

           Primary Combustion Air For Burner
                                                                                    Oxygen
                                                                                    Enriched
                                                                                    Primary Com-
                                                                                    bustion Air
                                                                                    for Burners
             Figure 3-3e.  Oxygen-Enrichment of Primary Combustion Air (Ref. 24,25,26, and 50)
  Oxygen
  Lances
                                                                                     Oxygen
                                                                                     Lances
               ' J f (/ J    J ;   -. J  J    -  •  _l___M^_ ___'  '                 ^ • •
             Figure  3-3f.  Horizontal  Oxygen Lancing just above the Bath (Ref.  28)


                 Figure 3-3.    Methods  of Oxygen Addition


                                            70

-------
through a multiplicity of oxygen-fuel burners resulting in high SCL
                                  37
concentration and fuel efficiency.
     The experiences with the above methods are discussed in the following
sections of this report.

3.9.4  EXPERIENCE WITH OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT
     Saddington et al   of INCO describe how oxygen-enrichment of the
combustion air affected either a reduction in the coal consumption by
19 percent or increased the production by 36 percent when smelting
copper-nickel concentrates.  Their test results are given in Table 3-1.
            Table 3-1.  INCO'S DATA ON OXYTEN ENRICHMENT
                     IN A REVERBERATORY FURNACE
      OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT                    TEST         STANDARD
      Coal rate, tpd                       174             214
      Oxygen rate, tpd                      91             Nil
      Net matte and slag, tpd            1,540           1,400
      HIGHER THROUGHPUT RATE WITH OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT
      Coal rate, tpd                       213             206
      Oxygen rate, tpd                      80             Nil
      Net matte and slag, tpd            1,900           1,400
                       39
       Kupryakov  et  al     report Russian  experience  with  oxygen-
  enrichment  of combustion air  at Balkhash  Mining  and  Metallurgical
           31
  Combine.     Their  test  results show  that  with  each percentage of
  airblast  enriched  with  oxygen, reverberatory performance  increased
  by 2.7  percent, while fuel  consumption  dropped by  2.2 percent.
  Sulfur  dioxide  concentrations  in  the waste gases increased from
  1.5 to  2.5  percent, while the  amount of dust entrained  with the
  waste gases  fell by 40  to 45  percent.   The wear  of the  brick

                                  71

-------
lining of the furnace arch, with oxygen-enriched blasts fed to the
air duct, was  the same as when conventional airblasts were  used.
     Kupryakov et al  also report the tests conducted at Almalyk
Copper Smelter on the use of oxygen-enriched  blasts in rever-
beratory smelting in  order to find optimum methods of feeding
oxygen to the furnace.    Increasing the oxygen content in the
blast from 21 to 40 percent brought an 84.4 percent increase in
the furnace output capacity.  Figure 3-4 shows the variation in
specific fusion* with the oxygen content of a blast and its growth
per 1 percent of oxygen addition of the blast.

     The S02 concentration was measured at varying operating
conditions for the furnace.  Waste-gas samples for determining
the S02 content were  taken at the furnace output.  The SOp con-
centration in the flue gas sharply increased up to 25 percent CL
in the blast as shown in Figure 3-5.  Beyond  this oxygen con-
centration in the blast, the S02 concentration in the flue gas
slowly flattens. Increasing the oxygen content of the blast from
21 to 40 percent, increased the S02 concentration in the flue
gas from 2.4 to nearly 7 percent.
                     41
     Zhuravlev et al     did some theoretical  work on the smelt-
ing rate in a reverberatory furnace with oxygen-enrichment of
combustion air.  They give a nomograph for specific fusion in a
reverberatory furnace as a function of fuel rate and percent of
oxygen-enrichment.   Figure 3-5 is the nomograph which shows the
dependence of the specific fusion of the charge on the thermal
load  (fuel rate) at various 02 content in the blast.  It was
stated that the model was verified at NGMK Copper Smelter.  Their
tests show the direct relationship between the smelting rate, fuel
rate, and percent of oxygen-enrichment of the combustion air.
 *Specific  fusion  -  Tons  of  charge  smelted  per  square meter  of  furnace
 hearth  per day.
                                 72

-------
                                                                    c CMU
                                                                    o o TO
                                                                    •f    C
                                                                    in 
                                                               ID
                                                               O
                                                            o
                                                            to
                                                            o
                                                            ut
 Ol fO S-
 O.    
                                                                    Ol
                                                                    (J 4->
    !_
    it) C
  • -C •!-
to o
 I    4->
co  
-------
     Wrampe el al    report Linde's experience with oxygen-enrich-
ment of combustion air in reverberatory furnaces at U.S. smelters.
They came up with a mathematical model of the copper reverberatory
furnace.  The model describes the smelting, flue gas rates, and
the effluent S02 concentrations as functions of the tonnage oxygen
and fuel rates.  The model was verified at various smelters in the
U.S.  Their theoretical and experimental results indicate that
when fuel rate was increased with oxygen usage, the incremental
charge-to-oxygen ratio was ascertained to range between 4.5 to
7.0 tons per ton.  The S02 content of the effluent gas was in-
creased from 3.5 to 5 percent with oxygen use.  Copper losses in
the slag diminished by 15 to 23 percent.  Generally, it was found
that the overall refractory and material temperatures increased
by approximately 0.5 F° per mscfm of oxygen and the flue gas tem-
perature increased by about 1.2 F° for the same amount of oxygen.

     Itakura et al     report their experience with oxygen-fuel
burners that penetrate the furnace roof vertically and are direct-
ed towards the charge banks at Onahama Smelter.   The oxygen con-
sumption was 2,370 m3/hr (83,700 ft3/hr).   The advantage of using
the oxygen-fuel burners that penetrate the furnace roof vertically
is that the heat is released near or on the charge banks rather
than near the furnace lining thereby eliminating the problem of
exceeding the lining temperature limitations.
          44
     Goto    further describes the experience at the Onahama
smelter.  A pilot furnace of 120 ton solid charge per day capacity
was used to conduct oxygen-enrichment experiments.  These tests
were conducted to determine the optimum conditions for the most
efficient combustion.
     The experiments were continued over a period of 3 years.   The
results showed that the formation of dust, the oxidation of sulfur,
and the matte grade are comparable, under appropriate conditions,
to those in a conventional  green charge reverberatory operation.
Wear of the furnace refractories was also found not to be serious

                                 74

-------
and it was confirmed that the oxygen-oil burner can  be  successfully
applied to the  reverberatory furnace.
     The oxygen-oil  burner used for these experiments was  devel-
oped by Shell Research Limited and was somewhat modified  to  estab-
lish its suitability for smelting of copper concentrates.
     In 1971, the oxygen-oil burners were installed  in  addition
to the existing conventional oil burners in the full-scale rever-
beratory furnace.  Table 3-2 shows the general specification of
the oxygen-oil  burner.  Two burners were used  and  are  presently
being used when furnace capacity must be increased.  Table 3-3
shows the reverberatory furnace data before and after the  use of
oxygen-fuel  burners in the furnace.  Capacity  has  been  increased
by 3,000 tons of concentrates per month for each burner at an
equivalent oxygen concentration in the reverberatory furnace of
22.5 percent (in the air).  The exhaust gas volume has  remained
the same and relatively little  refractory wear or  slag  loss  has
been encountered.
       Table 3-2.  GENERAL  SPECIFICATIONS OF THE OXYGEN-OIL
                     BURNER AT  ONAHAMA SMELTER
                Fuel

                Fuel consumption (max.)

                Oxygen consumption (max.)

                Oxygen pressure

                Length

                Diameter

                Cooling system
Bunker C oil

106gal/Hr

42,400ft3/Hr

71 Lb/in?

76 in

 6 in

 Water Jacket
                                 75

-------
     Table 3-3.  REVERBERATORY FURNACE DATA AT ONAHAMA  SMELTER
               BEFORE AND AFTER THE USE OF OXY-FUEL
                      BURNERS IN THE  FURNACE
                                       Dec. 1970         Jan. 1972
Concentrate smelted (ton)
Silicious flux smelted (ton)
Limestone smelted (ton)
Reverts smelted (ton)
Total solid charge (ton)
Fuel oil consumed (kl)
Oxygen consumed (stp cu m)
Matte produced (ton)
Matte grade (%)
Slag produced (ton)
Copper in slag (%)
24,769
3,279
2,059
571
30,678
4,723
-
20,354
34.5
20,443
0.46
29,919
4,038
2,171
779
36,907
4,870
667,058
25,180
34.4
25,936
0.47
         Note:  All weights are on dry basis.
                    45
     Eastwood et al    report their experience with  oxygen-enrich-
ment at the Rokana smelter.  The oxygen consumption  at  the  rever-
beratory furnace was 90 ton per day.  An  18  percent  increase  in
production resulted, which was far below  expectations.   The per-
formance was later improved by optimizing the oxygen injection.
The S02 concentration in the flue gas stream increased  from 1.0 to
1.6 percent.
                46                   47
     Vera et al    and Achurra et al     present the  experience
using oxygen-fuel burners at the Caletones smelter in Chile.
During a 5-year period, the smelter was converted from  conventional
end-burner air-fuel combustion to complete oxygen-fuel  combustion
using a maximum of 12 oxygen-fuel  burners suspended  from the roof
impinging on the charge banks.   Oxygen consumption reached  380
long tons per day.   This allowed a smelting  rate of  1,520 dry tons
per day with a fuel consumption in the range of 0.81 x  10   Kcal.
This was a considerable increase in production, which was the
objective of the application, and also resulted in reduced  fuel
consumption.  In addition, and most significantly from  a pollution
control standpoint, the S0£ concentration range in the  offgases
increased to 5.8 to 7.3 percent.   Oxygen-enrichment, under  these
conditions was approximately 60 percent with infiltration air
                                76

-------
 providing  nitrogen  dilutionJSee Appendix J  for a more detailed
 discussion of  the Caletones  smelter  experience with oxygen-enrich-
 ment.)
                48
      Smirnov's    heat  engineering computations show the possi-
 bility  of  greatly reducing fuel consumption  and of intensifying
 the  smelting process when it is enriched with oxygen.  Based on
 approximate calculations, the  effect of oxygen-enrichment of air
 on fuel  consumption is  given in the  Table 3-4.

      Table 3-4.  SMIRNOV'S COMPUTATIONS SHOWING THE EFFECT OF
            OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT OF AIR  ON FUEL  CONSUMPTION
 Oo CONTENT  IN BLAST  (%)                  FUEL CONSUMPTION  (%)
           21                                    100
           25                                     74
           30                                     59
           35                                     52
            49
     Smirnov   reports that calculations and test made at various
plants show that when using blast containing 28 to 30 percent
oxygen, the S0£ in the reverberatory furnace gases is near 4 per-
cent.   Preheating blasts  and enriching them with oxygen will  in-
tensify the smelting process and, according to  approximate cal-
culations, make it possible to increase the specific fusion in
the reverberatory furnaces from 6-8 to 10-12 tons of charge per
  2
m of  hearth area per day when smelting roasted materials: it
                                             2
would  be  increased from 4-5 to 6-8 tons per m  if dried unroasted
materials were being smelted.
                    50
     Otvagina et al    report a  study made on the composition of
waste  gases from the reverberatory furnace at the Almalyk Mining

                                 77

-------
and Metallurgical Combine with a view of determining the possibility
of using waste gases for sulfuric acid production.  The reverbera-
                                                2
tory furnace output ranged from 4.5 to 6.5 ton/m  day depending
                                                      2
on the blast oxygen content (furnace hearth area 240 m ).  During
the study, a complete analysis was made of the waste gas composi-
tion by taking samples immediately downstream of the furnace.
The temperature at the end of the furnace fluctuated from 1,250°C
to 1,340°C, and the negative pressure was 0.2 to 0.55 mm H20.
The technological characteristics for the reverberatory smelting
operation are given in Table 3-5.
    Table 3-5.  REVERBERATORY SMELTING PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS
                  AT ALMALYK MINING AND METALLURGICAL COMBINE
Oxygen content
in blast (%)
21
25-27
29-30
Heat load of gas
106 Kcal/hr
67.2
64.5
55
Smelting rate
ton/in^ day
4.57
5.55
5.8
S02 in flue
qas (%)
1.74
4.4
5.3
 3.9.5  COMPARISON OF VARIOUS STUDIES IN THE LITERATURE
                                     51
      The results from Linde's model    were compared with
                   52
 Zhuravlev's model    and they were found to be in agreement.  Two
 comparisons were made;  the first with a constant fuel rate (natural
 gas) and increase in oxygen content of combustion air from 21 to
 23 and 25 percent; the  second with the fuel rate increased and
 the oxygen content of combustion air varied (21, 23, and 25 percent)
 The percentage increase in smelting rate was calculated for a
 base-case.  The base-case conditions were 200 mscfh of natural
 gas and 21 percent oxygen in combustion air (no oxygen-enrichment).
      For a constant fuel rate of 200 mscfh of natural gas, the
 percentage increase in  smelting rate from the base-case conditions
                                 78

-------
with 23 and 25 percent oxygen content in combustion air for Linde's
model was 13.22 and 27.27.  Zhuravlev's model gave the percentage
increase in smelting rate as 14.6 and 28.75.
     When the fuel was increased to 230 mscfh of natural gas,
the percentage increase in smelting rates from the base-case
conditions, with 21 and 25 percent oxygen content in combustion
air for Linde's model were 23.55, 36.8 and 51.24.  Zhuravlev's
model gave the percentage increase in smelting rates as 14.6,
35.2 and 50.2.
     Kupryakov et al    and Otvagina et al    report that the
specific fusion in a reverberatory furnace increases 25 percent
when the oxygen content in the combustion air is increased from
21 to 25 percent.  This was found to be in good agreement with
Linde's and Zhuravlev's models which gave the percentage increase
in specific fusion as 27.27 and 28.75 percent, respectively.
These references do not report the effects on matte grade or impur-
ity elimination.

3.9.6  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT AND S09 CONCENTRATION
       IN THE FLUE GAS SYSTEM                       £
   The increase in S02 concentration in the flue gas stream with
oxygen-enrichment to the reverberatory furnace can be attributed to
a reduced quantity of gases generated.  For a given stoichiometric
oxygen-to-fuel ratio, the amount of flue gas per ton of material
smelted decreases with oxygen-enrichment.  Assuming that the amount
of sulfur oxidized remains the same, the concentration of SO-  in
the flue gas stream increases with the decrease  in the volume  of
flue gas.  The nitrogen that would normally have been carried
along with air oxygen is eliminated.
     All the theoretical and experimental studies on oxygen-enrich-
ment in reverberatory furnaces show that the S02 concentration  in
the flue gas stream increases with oxygen-enrichment.  The relation-
ship between S02 concentration in the flue gas stream with oxygen-
enrichment given by Linde's model and Kupruakov's results were
                                 79

-------
compared and were found to be in reasonable agreement.   For example, at
a constant fuel rate, with 21 and 25 percent oxygen content in combust-
ion air, Linde's model gave the SOp concentration in the flue gas
as 3.55 and 5.5 percent, respectively.   Kupryakov's results gave
the SOp concentrations as 3.8 and 5.8 percent, respectively.
Table 3-6 compares the results of these two studies.
 Table 3-6.  LINDE'S AND KUPRYAKOV'S EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL
        DATA SHOWING THE DEPENDENCE OF S02 CONCENTRATION IN
              REVERBERATORY FLUE GAS ON OXYGEN IN BLAST
% Oxygen in Blast

21
23
25

21
23
25
c
1
Linde
Experimental
3.1
3.75
4.6
Theoretical
3.6
4.35
5.3
i S02 in Flue Gas
Kupryakov

3.8
—
5.8

4.1
—
6.3
     With 30 percent oxygen content in combustion air, the SOp
content in reverberatory flue gas at the Rokana smelter increased
from 1.0 to 1.6 percent.  At the Onahama smelter, the SOp strength
in the flue gas increased by 0.3 percentage points of S00 per burner.
                                                     3              3
The maximum oxygen consumption per burner was 1,190 m /hr (42,000 ft /hr),
Onahama comparative results gave an increase from a concentration of
2.6 percent S02 with no oxygen, to 3.2 percent SOp with 22.5 percent
oxygen content in the air.
                                 80

-------
                     55
      Otvagina et al    report that when oxygen content in the blast
 was increased from 21 to 30 percent, the SCL concentration in the
 reverberatory flue gases increased from 1.47 to 5.3 percent.
      Beals et al    report SCL concentration as high as 18 percent
 with oxygen lancing of the bath.  The measurements were done on
 a pilot furnace using oxygen.  It is believed that operating con-
 ditions in the  furnace,  the charge constituents,  and  the  method
 of oxygen  addition  all  influence the absolute value of SC^.
                                        57
      The work at the Caletones smelter    indicated that  with
 approximately 60 percent oxygen-enrichment (infiltration  air
 providing  nitrogen), an S02 concentration  of over 7 percent  could
 be attained with a  full-scale working reverberatory furnace.

 3.9.7  ADVANTAGES OF USING OXYGEN-ENRICHMENT IN REVERBERATORY FURNACE
      The advantages of using oxygen-enrichment in reverberatory
 furnace are listed  below and are discussed later  in the same order.
      1.   Increase  smelting rate
      2.   Decreased specific fuel  consumption
      3.   Smelting  of higher melting point materials
      4.   Reduced copper losses in slag
      5.   Decreased dust content in flue gases
      6.   Lower capital  and operating costs of the flue gas
           handling  systems
      7.   Increased S02  concentration in flue gas

 There  are indications that there is a net energy saving even including
 energy required for oxygen production.
     As described earlier in this report, the smelting rate increases
                                58
with oxygen-enrichment.  Rokana    smelters achieved better than 18 per-
cent increase in production with oxygen-enrichment.   Linde reported a
                                                                      59
25 to 50 percent increase in production with oxygen-enrichment.   INCO
achieved a 36 percent increase in production with oxygen-enrichment.
Kupryakov    reported that at a constant fuel rate,  enrichment of the
blast air to 35 percent increased the specific throughput by 64 percent.
                                  81

-------
     Oxygen can be employed to reduce fuel and air rates while
maintaining a constant smelting rate.  Kuprayakov reports a de-
crease in fuel consumption by 2.2 percent with a 2.7 percent in-
crease in production when oxygen was used in a reverberatory
furnace at Almalyk Copper smelter.  With oxygen-enrichment, INCO
received a decrease in coal consumption by 19 percent.
     Since higher temperatures could be attained by using oxygen-
enrichment due to more efficient combustion and elimination of
inert nitrogen, materials with high melting points could be eco-
nomically  smelted.  When using higher temperatures in the furnace,
care must be taken to ensure that the lining temperatures are
within the "specified limits."
     With oxygen-enrichment, the slag temperature increases, de-
creasing its viscosity.  The copper particles entrained in the
slag settle out much easier, thereby diminishing the copper losses
                    CO
in the slag.  Linde  '" found that the copper losses were decreased
by 15 to 23 percent with oxygen-enrichment.  With the oxygen lancing
                     CO
of bath, Beals et al    report a vigorous agitation of the bath
and the temperatures of the matte and slag equalized thereby pro-
moting slag cleaning action.  Due to this agitation, the fine
copper prills in the slag agglomerate and form large copper par-
ticles which settle out of the slag in the subsequent quiescent
settling zone of the furnace.  Higher temperature slag, however,
causes greater oxidation of the copper which tends to counter-
balance the above effect.
      Kupryakov    reports that as oxygen concentration in the com-
bustion air increases, the gas velocity through the furnace de-
creases resulting in a decrease in the dust content in the flue
gases.  As oxygen content  increases above 30 percent, the dust
concentration of waste gases starts increasing.  This increase
is probably due to increase in the mean furnace temperatures and
larger duration of the charge feeding operations.  Higher tempera-
tures and longer charging  periods tend to loosen the charge, in-
creasing the amount of dust entrained with the waste gases.
                                  82

-------
     With oxygen-enrichment, the quantity of the gas per ton of
smelting capacity decreases.  This results in a lower capital and
operating cost of flue gas handling systems per ton of smelting.
     As oxygen concentration in the combustion air increases, the
S02 concentration of the flue gas increases.  This increase in S0?
concentration is due to more charge melted resulting in more sulfur
oxidized, higher temperature causing more sulfur to be oxidized,
and lower volume of gases through the furnace.  With the increase
of oxygen concentration beyond 30 percent, the gas volume through
the furnace can tend to increase due to false air infiltration through
the charging hopper as a consequence of more frequent charging,
slag-tapping holes, etc.  The result can be that the rate of increase
in S02 concentration in the flue gas can start to decrease.  This
effect is, of course, site specific.

3.9.8  REFRACTORY WEAR WITH OXYGEN USAGE
     From the literature, it is seen that one of the main con-
trolling factors in the application of oxygen in the reverberatory
furnace is the furnace refractory temperature.  The roof tem-
perature should not exceed the maximum of the allowable operating
range.  The experiences on refractory wear with oxygen usage in the
reverberatory furnace are given herein.  To some extent, the
method of oxygen introduction to the furnace dictates the increase
in the roof temperature.  For example, when oxygen-fuel burners are
used (Figure 3-3b) they can release the heat close to the charge, and
the roof temperature is not significantly increased.  When undershoot-
ing the flames with oxygen (Figure 3-3d), high temperatures are created
in the vicinity of the charge, but the furnace roof tends to be pro-
tected by the flame itself.  For these reasons, the aforementioned
methods of oxygen-enrichment not only give high thermal efficiency,
but also minimize roof wear problem.  Oxygen-enrichment of primary air
(Figure 3-3e) is very easy to control, but resluts in lower thermal
efficiencies than the above two methods of oxygen-enrichment and also
increases the roof temperatures.
                                  83

-------
     Saddington et al    report that their preliminary investiga-
tions indicate that the refractory cost per ton of output in a
reverberatory furnace should not increase when oxygen is introduced.
By introducing the oxygen below the fuel nozzles, the hottest zone
of the flame was-found to be at the bottom next to the bath.
They demonstrated this by a series of measurements of flame
temperatures on two identical reverberatory furnaces, one of which
was using oxygen for enrichment.  Figure 3-7 shows the temperature
variation along the length of the two furnaces taken 4 feet below
the top of the furnace roofs.  As shown in the figure, when the
flame was undershot with oxygen, the temperature in the vicinity
of the furnace roof did not increase significantly.
     Table 3-7 gives the measured furnace temperatures at various
heights above the slag line at 15 and 25 feet from the burners
when oxygen is used in the furnace.  As shown in the table, the
highest temperatures are produced at about 2 feet above the slag
1 i ne.
     Kupryakov et al    report that in examining the operation
of the reverberatory furnace with oxygen-enriched blasts, part-
icular attention was given to the condition and the wear of the
furnace roof.  Under normal operation without oxygen-enrichment,
the service life of the reverberatory furnace roof was 26 months.
During February 1966, the furnace was given a general overhaul,
and the roof was made of 460 mm chrome-magnesite bricks.  The
roof was the sprung-arch type not generally used in todays designs.
With the furnace operating on air blast and using a heat load of
50 x 10   to 70 x 10  Kcal/hr, the roof wear in the highest temp-
erature region after 1 year of operation was 62 mm or 0.17 mm/24
hours.  During the period between March 3 and July 21 1967, the
roof wear in reverberatory furnace operating on cold blasts
(with no preheated air for combustion) dropped to 16-17 mm or
to 0.12 mm/24 hours.
                                 84

-------

mo
•
MOO
ib
•
kl
5 MOO
a
w
^
51400
J
fc
c
i
\
t






_ TE
TAI
FU


**

0





MPER
KEN '
RNAC

^
•U*NC


>
^'
/•
ATURE
1' BEL
E RO


A NO
|
r

^
^


ME
OW 1
OF


wues
X
t 	 1
^



ASURC
•OP 0



• -
0
U,.





:MENI
F




rcc
•>
"Ks


rs




0
T ri
N




man


4
IOM

^T|
X
'%t

NoC
NO
as i
113 II



IUNNI.
•^

x^


i

X
REVERB
OXYGEN "
rpo COAL
ICFH NATO
r-Ti


s
M CM
™^|


0
0
X
L
1

^ 4 ^
RAL GAS
HBKB

•
"^

K



amB

h~
i
|0 ' '

r

'
' ' i
No. S REVERB J
S^ITM OXYGEN- —

a:


djuEa

0
JNRICHME
NT
80 TPD OXtG£^
TO TPO COAL
1 MCFH NATURAL C«$


	
	


ISO!


• 0
1
i

J Jr
••
Figure 3-7.   Reverberatory Furnace Temperatures in the
    Vicinity of the Furnace Roofs With and Without
           Oxygen-Enrichment at INCO Smelter
 Table 3-7.  MEASURED FURNACE TEMEPRATURES PRODUCED BY
          OXYGEN-ENRICHED AIR AT INCO SMELTER
Height Above
Slag Line (in)
68
36
24
12
9
6
15 ft. From
Burners (°F)
2,620
2,850
3,910
2,895
2,755
2,515
30 ft. From
Burners (°F)
2,740
2,850
2,890
2,865
	

                           85

-------
     During the first test period, the furnace operated on a
blast enriched with 25 percent oxygen, the latter being fed
through the tuyeres and the air duct.  During this period, the
wear of the furnace roof reached 5 mm (0.17 mm/24 hours).  So a
slight change in the roof thickness made it impossible to deter-
mine the effect of oxygen concentration in the blast on the roof
wear.
     The maximum rate of wear was found during the frequent changes
in the technological operating conditions of the furnace.  Thus,
during the period between August 21 and September 21, the rever-
beratory furnace operated for 7 days on blasts containing 35
percent oxygen fed through tuyeres and 5 days on blasts containing
30 percent oxygen.  The furnace operated for 2 days on blasts
containing 30 percent oxygen fed through the air duct.  For the
remaining period of time, the furnace operated on an air blast
                                                          •3
with fuel consumptions of 6,000, 8,000, 9,000 and 10,000 m /hour.
During the entire test period, roof  wear reached 7 mm or 0.23
mm/24 hours.
     When reverberatory smelting is performed on blast containing
35 and 40 percent oxygen, fed through tuyeres and the air duct,
furnace wear reached a rate of 0.18 mm/24 hours.
     During the entire test period, the average wear of the
furnace roof reached a rate of 0.2 mm/24 hours.  Taking into
account the measurement accuracy and the frequent changes in the
technological operating conditions on the furnace, the wear of
the furnace roof during reverberatory furnace operation on oxygen-
enriched blasts did not differ markedly from wear when operating
                             CO
with conventional air blasts.
     Itakura et al    report that  using oxygen-fuel burners in
the reverberatory furnace did not  increase the lining wear.  This
is probably due to the heat being  released close to the charge
rather than the lining.
                                86

-------
      Wrampe and Nollman    report during their work on oxygen-
 enrichment at reverberatory furnaces at various U.S. smelters,
 that  the  overall  refractory temperatures  increased  by  approxi-
 mately  0.5°F  per  mscfm  of  oxygen.   During  their tests,  excessive
 roof  temperatures did not  become  a  problem until  production  in-
 creases exceeded  50  percent.
                                       71   72
      The  Caletones smelter experience    '     indicated  that  it
 was necessary to  use a  bottom  ventilation  system but that  roof
 refractory  wear was  in  the range  of 10 percent  over a  6 months
 operating period.  Maximum temperatures were  no higher  than
 "normal"  operation and  more uniform temperature distribution was
 obtained.
 3.9.9  CONCLUSION
      The  theoretical as well as experimental  and  operational
 results on  oxygen-enrichment in a reverberatory furnace indicate
 the feasibility of using oxygen to  increase S02 concentration  in
 the flue  gas.  The controlling factors in  the application  of
 oxygen  to a reverberatory  furnace are, feed characteristics,
 furnace refractory and  slag temperatures,  and the auxiliary
                                                       73
 material  handling capabilities.  According to Linde's    exper-
 ience,  excessive  roof temperatures  do  not  become  a  problem until
 production  increases exceeding 50 percent  are desired.  Kuprayakev
 et al     Itakura  et  al     and Saddington et al    also  report
 the lining  wear to be not  very different with or  without oxygen-
 enrichment.   Mith  an increase in material  temperatures, slag
 handling  becomes  difficult  with excessive  fluidity,  but this,
 according to  Wrampe et  al    can be easily corrected by flux
 adjustment  in the  future.
      From the economic  point of view,  oxygen-enrichment should be
 used  to increase  the smelting rate.  When  no production increase
 is desired, the quantity of sulfur available for  oxidation from
 the feed  remains  constant.  The volume flow of  gas  through the
furnace would decrease  with oxygen addition, and some additional
                                  87

-------
sulfur oxidized from the charge and the S02 concentration in the
flue gas would be increased.  In the case of increased production,
not only is the specific fuel consumption decreased, but the
concentration of SOp is further increased in the flue gases.
Figure 3-8 shows the relationship between fuel, smelting, flue
gas, and oxygen rates and SCL concentration.  While the quanti-
tative values may vary from case to case, the relative relation-
ships are indicated.


3.10  PREDRYING WET CHARGE
     Concentrates, as received at the smelter, generally contain
8 to 12 percent moisture, although this could vary widely de-
pending on the location and season.  In the green charge rever-
beratory furnace not only must this substantial amount of water
be evaporated, but the resulting water vapor must be heated to
the temperature of the smelting furnace offgases (2,350°F).  The
water vapor adds to the volume of hot gases that must be treated
and thus reduces the capacity of the smelting furnace.
     Concentrate drying prior to smelting still requires energy
for evaporation of water, but the water vapor may leave the dryer
at temperatures as low as 180°F so that considerably less fuel is
requirement for drying than for handling the same amount of moisture
in the wet-charge reverberatory furnace.  An additional advantage
is that dry concentrates frequently retain a small amount of
sensible heat  from  the drying operation.  This sensible heat
would account  for a  small reduction  in  smelting furnace fuel
requirements,  as well as reducing dilution nitrogen producing
a small net increase in SCL concentration.
     A further advantage to drying the  charge material is the
added capability for furnace sealing to minimize infiltration air.
By limiting moisture the possibility of destructive water vapor
explosions or  pressure surges is minimized.
                                 88

-------
                                               o
                                               o
                                               §
                                                   O
                                                   O
                                                   C3
                                                   <


                                                   O
                                                o
                                                <*>
                                                o
                                                C4
                     o
                     CO
 0)
 o
 c
 O)
T3

 0)
 Q.
 03
U_  0)
    3
T3 U.
 C  03
 o
•r-  C
4J  0)
 >
T3  X
 O O

Q_  (1)
    Dl
 O E
4-> O
 * i-

 (U C
-Q O
 S- O.
 CU =3
 >
 (1)
                                                        00
                                                         I
                                                        OO

                                                         cu
                                                         S-
                                                         3
                                                         on
H JOS W '31VU SVO1VUOLVN
                    89

-------
3.11  CONTINUOUS FURNACE CHARGING
     Most U.S. smelters use Wagstaff guns for calcine reverberatory
furnace charging (Section 2.0) resulting in fluctuations in S02
concentration in the offgas.  As soon as the feed material enters
the bath the greatest generation of SO^ is encountered, followed
by a gradual reduction until the next charge point.
     With smaller quantities charged at more frequent intervals,
approaching continuous feed, a more steady-state SCL concentration
versus time can be achieved and peak values will be minimized.
This characteristic will minimize the size and cost of subsequent
S02 control fequipment since one of the major design criteria is
peak S02.
     The Copper Cliff Smelter of INCO Metals Ltd., is side wall-
charged on a continuous basis.  It is further discussed in Appen-
dix C.

3.12  ELIMINATION OF THE REVERBERATORY FURNACE
     The extensive consideration and discussions being held through-
out the world on modified copper smelting processes such as the
Noranda, the Outokumpu flash smelting, the Mitsubishi continuous
smelting processes, various chemical processes, and the use of
electric furnaces rather than the combustible fuel reverberatory
furnace all seem to indicate that great changes are in progress
for the processing portion of the copper industry.  Despite the
many advantages and the "forgiving" nature of the reverberatory
furnace, the high energy consumption of the green feed furnace
will certainly subject it to continuous review in the future
comparing it with the new processes currently being developed.
                                                            79
Calcine charge furnace processes may be energy competitive.
     At the very least, the new processes tend to produce smaller
quantities of offgases per ton of produced copper and generally
produce higher concentrations of S02-  This obviously makes S02
                                  90

-------
control more cost-effective and production easier which will no
doubt be a prime consideration for future decisions.
     It can certainly be said that there is now and will be more
serious thought given to elimination of the reverberatory furnace
during the next few years.  However, we hasten to add that there
are many people in the industry who feel very strongly that the
reverberatory furnace is a reliable, easy to operate device with
many characteristics that, from a smelting standpoint, introduce
great flexibility and operational advantages.

3.13  CONVERTER SCHEDULING AND HOODING
     The availability of a strong S02 stream can provide some
flexibility in processing streams by blending, since the con-
verter can produce a gas stream containing over 10 percent SO,,.
When it is picked up by conventional  hooding with 100 percent
dilution air, this will  reduce to over 5 percent S0£ during the
slag blow.  (See Appendix H for calculations.)  During the copper
blow, SOo gases with a concentration as high as 28 percent (which
would be reduced to 14 percent with dilution air inside the pickup
hood) are produced.
     A typical converter sequence including slag blowing, copper
blowing, and charge times can take between 11 and 12 hours per
charge.   Slag blow will  be approximately 6 hours, copper blow approx-
imately 2 hours, and offtime, which includes charging and pouring,
approximately 3 hours.
     The SOp content of the off-gas for a single converter is shown as
a function of time in Figure H-l  using the assumptions discussed in
Appendix H.   Based on the calculations, five converters would be
necessary to have one converter in the copper blow at all  times.
However, this condition is not, of course, attainable with fewer than
five converters.  Figure H-2 shows the scheduling for three converters
which will allow one converter producing high concentration S02 at
                                 91

-------
all times (either copper or slag blows).   Figure H-l  also  shows
the flow rate fluctuations during operation.
     Thus, scheduling of converters can provide a more steady stream
of S0? to the acid plant and,  with three converters or more,  maintain
a high concentration of SOp-

     Converter hooding systems are extremely critical in terms of main-
taining high S02 concentrations in the offgas going to the acid plant.
It is difficult to obtain and maintain a close fitting hood because of
several factors including out of roundness of the converter,  buildup
of molten-solidified material  on the converter mouth, and  occasional
crane damage.  Chain curtains or sheet metal  tabs have been used to
minimize the effective gap between the bottom of the converter hood
and the converter mouth.  These approaches tend to compensate for the
unevenness of the matching surface and minimize dilution air intake.

3.14  BLENDING
     Blending of rich SCL streams with lean S02 streams to provide proper
concentration for direct processing in a sulfuric acid plant has been
conventional practice in the industry with fluid-bed roasters and con-
verter offgases.  Reverberatory furnace offgases are blended with con-
tinuous smelting process offgases at the Naoshima smelter in Japan and
sent directly to a sulfuric plant (Appendix G).  If sufficiently high
SOp concentrations in other offgas streams are avilable to match the
acid plant requirements, then blending of reverberatory furnace offgas
can be accomplished.   A study of some of the many possible plant emission
desulfurization scenarios for new smelters is presented in Section 6.0.
     With current industry reverberatory furnace practice  resulting in
average S02 concentration from green charge furnaces of 1.0 to 1.5 per-
cent, calcine charge reverberatory furnaces 0.5 to 1.0 percent, and
their large gas volume flow rate (over 100,000 scfm), it is expected
that this approach would generally be marginal.  With increased rever-
beratory furnaces SOp concentration, the use of fluid-bed  roasters and
programmed converter operation to minimize S02 fluctuations,  blending

                                  92

-------
is a potential  approach to producing a gas  for direct acid  plant  pro-
cessing with current operational  smelters.   The addition of SOp con-
centration systems as discussed in Section  5.0 would also allow the
use of the blending technique.
                                  93

-------
                             SECTION 4
                    DIRECT ACID PLANT PROCESSING
4.1  INTRODUCTION
     Conventional single contact sulfuric acid plants will  operate
autothermally in a minimum range of 3.5 to 4.0 percent input S0?
concentration, and conventional double contact sulfuric acid
plants will operate autothermally in the minimum range of 4.0 to
5.5 percent S02 concentration.  This operation occurs because a
minimum temperature (approximately 800°F) is required to cause
"ignition" in the catalyst bed to promote the oxidation of S0? to
SO,.  The reaction proceeds exothermally in the catalytic con-
verter.  The heat generated raises the temperature of the gas
to the point where the efficiency of the reaction tends to de-
crease (approximately 1,100°F).  The gases are then brought out
of the catalytic converter and enter heat exchangers where the
heat is removed so that the gases can enter a second layer of
catalyst to continue the reaction.  The heat removed is trans-
ferred into the incoming gas to provide the thermal energy
necessary to reach the required inlet temperature of approxi-
mately 800°F.  When the S02 concentration is below the minimum
values (e.g., double contact 4.5 to 5.5  percent),  there  is not
sufficient heat available to raise the gases to the ignition
temperature.
     A second problem also occurs in the operation of the conven-
tional sulfuric acid plant using low concentrations of S02>  If the
gas containing S02 is not sufficiently dried, it will carry moisture
that will dilute the product acid.  The  lower the S02 concentration
in the gas, the lower will be available 'concentrated acid that
can be used to absorb incoming moisture.  The conventional
                                 94

-------
technique for removing moisture is to first preprocess by reducing
the temperature of the incoming gas with water sprays.  This re-
duces any excess moisture to that at saturation conditions.  The
gases are then passed through a drying tower where concentrated
acid is used to absorb the remaining moisture.  The amount of
concentrated acid available must be sufficient to not be diluted
below the product concentration requirement.  Or conversly the
temperature of the cooled gas must be low enough so that sufficient
moisture has been condensed to maintain the plant water balance.
If spray water temperatures are not low enough, then concentrated
(93 or 98 percent) acid cannot be produced.
     Thus,  the two basic reasons why low concentration gases can-
not be processed directly in a conventional sulfuric acid plant
are (1) insufficient heat is generated to maintain ignition temp-
erature in the catalyst bed, and (2) system water exceeds the
minimum content required to produce concentrated acid.  It is
possible to resolve these problems by providing additional
thermal energy and refrigeration.
     The existence of a basically different acid making approach
called the chamber process should be noted here even though in
current commercial practice this process is considered obsolete.
The reason the contact process is the commercial process used
today is because it can produce up to 100 percent concentration
of sulfuric acid as well  as oleum.  The chamber process can only
produce concentrations up to 70 to 75 percent.  The reason for
noting this process is that it can use S0? concentrations as low
as 0.5 percent which means that reverberatory furnace offgases
could be fed directly to this type of plant.  If the product
acid were to be used for applications where lower concentration
acid is needed (e.g., fertilizer production or leaching) then this
design should be considered.  Obviously, the lower concentration
acid would need to be used very close to the production point to
be economically feasible because of shipping costs.
                                95

-------
     A general discussion on metallurgical  contact acid plant
design, a description of work performed at the Onahama Smelter
where an acid plant was actually operated on low concentration
copper reverberatory furnace offgases,  and several potential
techniques for solving these problems,  are described in this
section.

4.2  METALLURGICAL AGID PLANT DESIGN
     There is a distinct difference between the requirements  for
a conventional acid plant usina SC^ generated by burning sulfur
when compared to a plant operating on offgases from a metallurgical
process.  The major difference is in terms of the objective in
the operation of the plant.  The metallurgical gas plant has  in most
cases been installed primarily for pollution control purposes and only
secondarily to produce sulfuric acid.  As a result of this the
metallurgical processes tend to control the operation of the
acid plant.
     The sulfuric acid plant by its nature is a constant process
device.  It requires a steady state feed and temperature condition
throughout the process.  When used in conjunction with a metallur-
gical plant it can be operated only when the feed gas is available.
While auxiliary S02 feed systems can be applied, this has not
been current practice in the United States' metallurgical plants.
     Thus the metallurgical acid plant is forced to operate with
continuous starts and stops resulting in temperature changes from
the high operating range to ambient.  This causes the gas condition
within  the plant to pass through saturation temperature with
subsequent acid condensation in various critical areas of the
system.  Resulting corrosion can be extensive if proper materials
are not used.  Startup can take a relatively long period of time.
It may  take as long as 8 hours to reach steady state temperature
conditions from a cold start.  On the other hand, if the plant
is designed with suitable  insulation, temperatures can be
                                 96

-------
maintained for as much as 6 to 8 hours and still have sufficient heat
available for a rapid startup.

    Thus, the design of a metallurgical sulfuric acid plant must take
into account the specific problems related to this application.  Proper
process selection, engineering design, plant construction, startup,
operation and maintenance are all important to the successful and long-
term operation of a metallurgical sulfuric acid plant.  It has been
demonstrated at some smelters using a double contact acid plant that
200 ppm S02 emission level can be consistently accomplished.   In
addition, on stream factors of well over 99 percent can also be accom-
plished with proper application of the above factors.
     One example is the Amax molybdenum smelter at Fort Madison,
Iowa where only 9 hours of down time (exclusive of annual main-
tenance) have been encountered in over 3 years of operation and
emissions average 200 ppm.  The addition of supplemental sulfur
dioxide when the smelter is not producing a suitable feed
stream  (by burning sulfur) and the use of additional catalyst are two
two approaches used at this plant that can improve operation.
     The use of a double contact sulfuric acid plant is not
necessarily always the most advantageous design approach.  The
reason for this is that the single contact design can operate
autothermally at an S02 concentration of approximately 3.5 percent
whereas the minimum concentration for the double contact is 4.5
percent.  When the blending technique is considered (see Sec-
tion 6.0) there are some conditions where only a lower blended
stream S02 concentration can be produced which can match the min-
imum for a single contact plant but not high enough for a double
contact plant.   Therefore,  it is necessary to evaluate the impact of
the alternative control  techniques upon overall  reduction of S02
emissions from the smelter based upon site-specific conditions,
especially in the case of retrofitting.

                                   97

-------
4.3  ONAHAMA SMELTER EXPERIENCE
     The Onahama Smelting and Refining Company,  located at Onahama
Harbor about 90 miles north of Tokyo, incorporated into their
smelter a reverberatory furnace offgas sulfuric  acid plant in 1971
and successfully operated this system to 1973.   This sulfuric acid
plant was reconstructed from an existing single  contact plant which
was no longer being used.  The SCL gas liberated from the green
charge feed reverberatory furnace had been passed through two parallel
boilers, a hot Cottrell electrostatic precipitator, and then vented
to the atmosphere through a 560 ft stack.   It was decided to build
a new double contact sulfuric acid plant to treat the existing
copper converter offgases.  As a result of this  installation, the
existing single contact acid plant, which had previously served to
manufacture sulfuric acid from this gas, was no  longer needed.
The green charge material fed into the reverberatory furnace
varied from 24 to 34 percent sulfur, averaging 33 percent.  The low
strength reverberatory offgases contained approximately 1.5 percent
S0?.   It was found that due to the cost of utilities, it would be
more desirable to operate the sulfuric acid plant at higher gas
          on
strengths.    At times, the Onahama Plant operated with 1 to 1.5
percent S02 gas; however, by using oxygen and fuel burners and
by closing considerable leakage of secondary air to the system, the
gas strength entering the sulfuric acid plant could be raised to
approximately 2.5 percent S00.  The modified reverberatory furnace
                                                  3
sulfuric acid plant handled approximately 90,000 m  per hour (approxi-
mately 53,000 scfm) of purified reverberatory gas
     The remodeled single contact sulfuric acid plant  acheived
efficiencies of 96 percent conversion of S02 to SO, even at low
concentrations of 1.5 percent SOp fed into the sulfuric acid plant
converter.  This sulfuric acid plant could produce product acid
strength of 93 to 94 percent H^SO,.
                                                                81
     A simplified flowsheet of the plant is shown  in Figure 4-1.
The reverberatory furnace gas, after passing through the waste

                                  98

-------
heat boilers, passes to a hot Cottrell precipitator.  The gas is then
carried to a washing tower and two series of gas coolers.  The first
is cooled by sea water and the second by a chilled water refrigeration
unit.  The gas leaving the gas coolers (condensers) then passes to
a wet Cottrell precipitator and then into a sulfuric acid drying
tower.   After the gas has been dried of water in the drying towers,
it is passed to the preheater heat exchanger which supplements the
heat required to preheat the gas flowing to the sulfuric acid
plant converter.  The gas, after passing through the converter, is
then returned to the heat exchangers.  It then passes through the
absorption tower and through a limestone scrubber and wet Cottrell
precipitator before being vented back to the atmosphere.
                                Sco voter

Cos
cooler
.
^
Cos
cooler
*•
*
            ( To ktdding yord )
            Figure 4-1.  Flowsheet of Remodeled Acid Plant
                                  99

-------
     Two problems existed In the Onahama Plant which are responsi-
ble for high operating cost.  One is the power required to refriger-
ate the chilled water which condenses excess moisture in the gas
(required to achieve water balance) to produce concentrated sulfuric
acid.   The other problem is the consumption of fuel  used in preheat-
ing the gas required because at the low (not autothermal) S02 con-
centration.  Not enough exothermic energy in the SC^ to S03 conversion
is generated to preheat the gas flowing to the converter to "ignition"
temperature.

4.4  REDUCED ENERGY SYSTEM
     Since the Onahama approach to direct processing of reverbera-
tory furnace offgas under full-scale conditions for S02 control had
been demonstrated at the cost of extra energy, this technique was
reviewed to determine if the process could be made more efficient
and economical.
     A simplified flowsheet showing an Onahama-type acid plant
applied to a copper smelter to process reverberatory furnace off-
gases is shown in Figure 4-2.  This flowsheet indicates the fluid
flow circuits and equipment.  It is not significantly different from
the system used at Onahama; however, it is included as the base-case
to show the modifications made to obtain the subsequent improved
system discussed herein.

     An improved process developed recently by the author is
described hereafter and includes flowsheets and pilot plant for the
sulfuric acid plant known as the Browder process (Figure 4-3).   This
reverberatory gas sulfuric acid plant is similar to the Onahama Plant
and similar to a conventional standard single contact plant in  the
gas flow after the drying tower.  However, certain modifications
have been made in the process which greatly improve the operation
while decreasing the utility consumption for the reverberatory  gas
sulfuric acid plant process.
                                 100

-------


-^
^s,
n

















«
4

3















h
«
4
>
/















I
1

r
u

	

t-
o
X
_
•
•
k
>
•



•
•
k
>
k
a



t *
«?
5°
^



















^y

3
s
K
h
u
^

i?
:c
III
• J
S
^


i
'3



c

»
\






















L
n
u
r
_





















»-
u
a.
5
o


8




















is^i
I|L kl? '
L_«.J


I






Z
u
a.
r*
S
u *4
I °a
S^",
g < kl
i*§ tr
Xkig W



SV8 J.OH

8
e*


















fe
°|
0

1
kl
X

N
?
«


0
"



5



1
*i
S
i
X
1
1








1'




8V
K
kl

g-li



SI
*•>
kl
t
"«
£*
SP



,
o
zr
=5!

I

1
5
gS
X
W_

















































o
?

^^
S
n
u



f
K

_



i
S
y

i


i












I-K
£u
"P

i
S

iffl


OK
zu
•p
Qt-
*
*
s«



,
it
¥1
oi
$r
i •

g
kl
I
K












































*-•*•
u



Nl K
So"
i Uo
xf o

?5|"
M K^"
&z
£{K

Si •
«0j
H"S
*l O










t'
0, S

^ 8


4
F-KOI
FURNACE
i*

°\2*
TpS
y§g
~>o
_t
— i
^4
•
i «
" r*"8
g!
i
"1
1 K
1 «
s!

K
~^0










Z
K
3

25
8J
, B

^§
8"
> c
w * *
|^ 0 0
o











o
il
*4-
3
oo
(/>
CO
>> 1-1
s?
O CD
4J Si
JO (t3
i- C_3
 to
OL 0
O
4- S-
O CL
4-> ro

U-



101

-------
                                                        o

                                                        il

                                                        M-

                                                        3
                                                        GO
                                                            s
                                                            10
                                                         s-
                                                           X-
                                                        -c S
                                                         (/) O

                                                         O CQ
                                                         OJ
                                                        4- r—

                                                        •r- 0.
                                                            O
                                                        CO

                                                          I
                                                         
-------
     The proposed system is essentially a single contact sulfuric
acid plant which uses all components with proven technology.  The
main difference is that the individual proven components are re-
arranged into a unique system whereby the preheater fuel consumption
in a standard weak gas operating plant is reduced to zero by using
approximately 8 percent of available waste heat boiler energy.  The
externally supplied refrigeration energy required in a low SCL con-
centration gas single contact plant to achieve water balance is also
reduced to zero.  This occurs by using excess heat generated in the
acid plant, which normally is passed to the atmosphere by cooling
tower.  Detailed engineering analysis of a typical system is included
in Appendix K.

     The new process overcomes the difficulties encountered with
high fuel consumption in the Onahama process.  This is achieved by
recovering heat from some of the reverberatory furnace hot gas
instead of burning fuel  in the preheater to preheat the gases flowing
to the converter as in the Onahama process.  The other features of
this process include the elimination of the electrical energy re-
quired for refrigeration and water chillers.  The heat normally
dissipated by cooling water in the sulfuric acid coolers for the
absorption tower is recovered as useful work.
     The process starts with a hot gas which can be 600° to 650°C
(1,100° to 1,200°F).  This temperature of gas is achieved by mixing
reverberatory gas leaving the furnace upstream of the waste heat
boilers with boiler exit gas in the appropriate amount to give the
temperature range mentioned.  This gas is then conveyed through
a brick-lined insulated duct into a top vestibule of a vertically
mounted shell and tube heat exchanger.  The hot gas passing through
the large tubes then goes into a knockout section and is returned
to the main gas stream of the reverberatory boiler outlet.  This
remaining gas which has been first used for preheating a hot
exchanger then passes to the hot Cottrell precipitators.  The hot
exhanger used takes the place of the fuel-fired preheater used in
                                 103

-------
the Onahama process.   This does, however, reduce the production
of steam in the waste heat boilers by approximately 8 percent.
     The hot heat exchanger is essentially a down flow shell and
tube heat exchanger similar to a fire tube waste heat boiler.  The
location of the hot heat exchanger in the system would be similar
to the location of the waste heat boiler functioning in a rever-
beratory furnace gas smelting plant.   Reverberatory furnace boilers
have been used for many years to cool the reverberatory gas passing
through to hot Dottrel! precipitators and thereby recover the energy
in the form of steam.  The normal reverberatory boilers are essen-
tially heat exchangers recovering energy in the form of steam from
hot gases passing through the boiler.  However, most of the rever-
beratory boilers are of a water tube-type.
     The hot heat exchanger used serves the same purpose as the
reverberatory furnace boilers in the Onahama process.  For many years,
the metallurgical industry has attempted to recover heat in gas to
gas heat exchangers without much success.  The recovery of heat in
gas to gas exchangers has been attempted by passing hot gas across
the tube bundle, through banks of tubes, or through finned tubes.
This design has been completely unsatisfactory because the gas, which
contains dust, has allowed the dust to impinge and collect upon the
heat transfer surface (tubes), thereby easily fouling the tubes and
bridging across the tubes to completely block the heat exchanger
to any further gas flow.
     The design of the hot heat exchanger handling reverberatory gas
uses a different concept.  This heat exchanger shown in Figure 4-4
receives hot metallurgical gas in a top refractory-lined vestibule
and the gas flows through the tubes similar to gas flow in a fire
tube waste heat boiler.  The main difference between this heat ex-
changer and a fire tube waste heat boiler is that most fire  tube
waste heat boilers are mounted in a horizontal position.  The design
of this heat exchanger will not allow any dust to impinge directly
on the tubes since there is no cross flow of dust.  The gas, after
                                 104

-------
                            REVERB AND BOILER GAS (MIXED)
                                    100,000 SCFM
                                       LANCING  PORTS
                78"+  2"  INS
   HOT GAS
  EXIT REVERB.
  MIXED WITH
  BOILER EXIT
     GAS
FROM COLD  H.E.
  2 l/4~ 2 1/2
REFRACTORY LINING

  3" RW INS
         78"
                                                            	 TO S02 (S03)
                                                           ACONVERTER

                                                    —MJ
                                                           12'-0" SHELL
                                                      (1/2" C.S.  ALUMINIZED)

                                                           1000-3" SS-304
                                                          14 BWG  M.W. C.S.
                                                      -TUBES-(24' TS TO 24')
                                                     30'  O.A.L.  (6'  EXTENSION)
                                                     BAFFLE  /54"  x  120" (TO 78")


                                                               TO  HOT COTTRELL


                                                                     BAFFLE
         FOR  SINGLE GAS
           FLOW ONLY
         (IF  MORE THAN
         ONE  FLOW MAKE
        MULTIPLE UNITS)
                                                                       PLAN
                   DUST OUTLET
                                                   DOUBLE WEIGHTED
                                                     DUMP VALVE
                    Figure 4-4.  Hot Heat  Exchanger
                                       105

-------
entering the top vestibule, flows through 3-in diameter tubes.   The
selection of 3-in tubes was made to prevent fouling or bridging
which occurs in smaller tubes.   The triangular pitch of the tube
arrangement is such that all tubes are placed on a 4-in triangular
pitch.  Therefore, only a 1-in  space exists between adjacent tubes.
The top tube sheet, therefore,  has no large areas in which dust can
settle out on the tube sheet.

      Since a small amount of minor dust may adhere to the inner
walls of the tubes, components are included in this hot gas heat
exchanger design  to allow for maintenance and cleaning by lancing of
the tubes from above the top vestibule.  It is suggested that the pro-
per lancing media would be  dry-compressed weak SCL gas leaving the
sulfuric acid plant drying  tower blower.  The analysis of this gas
is essentially the same as  the gas flowing through the tubes of
this  hot heat exchanger.  A self-cleaning feature of this hot heat
exchanger is a knockout section  in the lower vestibule.  This knock-
out section is incorporated by extending the 3-in heat exchanger tubes
below the tube sheet into the lower  vestibule by approximately 6 feet.
The gas  leaving  the tubes,  therefore, must turn and flow counter-
current  to the tubes causing a reversal  in gas flow and knockout of
any large particles of dust which would  normally settle out in the
lower vestibule.  The  lower vestibule has a conical bottom with an
angle greater than the angle of  repose of the dust thereby allowing
any dust leaving  the tubes  and settling  in the vestibule to be re-
moved from the bottom  nozzle.  Weighted  double airlock valves allow
the dust to be removed from the  system even though  it  is under
vacuum.
      This hot heat exchanger also serves as a preheater for start-
ing the  entire sulfuric acid plant from  a cold state.  When it is
used  as  a preheater, gases  of approximately  700°C to 760°C (1,300°F
to 1,400°F) are  then passed through  the  top vestibule  and  down
through  the tubes of the exchanger and vented  into  the waste heat
boiler outlet.   A reduced  flow of dry air from the  sulfuric acid
plant main  blowers is  then  passed through the cold  heat exchanger
                                 106

-------
and into the shell  side of the hot exchanger serving as a preheater.
The dry air is thereby preheated to approximately 480°C to 510°C
(900°F to 950°F), the required temperature for preheating the cata-
lyst in the converter for startup.  This high temperature operation
is required for approximately 30 to 48 hours for starting the sulfuric
acid plant assuming no residual heat from previous operations.
     If pollution regulations require that reverberatory furnace
vent gas not be vented to the atmosphere during the startup phase,
then the gas which is used for the preheating operation could be
discountinued and in its place preheated air of 700°C to 760°C (1,300°F
to 1,400°F) used for preheating operation of the acid plant con-
verter.  A fuel-fired furnace could be installed with the products
of combustion passing into the hot vestibule just as the reverbera-
tory gas was used.   After the plant has been started in 30 to 48 hours,
this combustion furnace would be discontinued and the mixed gas from
the reverberatory having a temperature of 600°C to 650°C (1,100°F
to 1,200°F) would then be passed through the hot heat exchanger.
The shell side (flow of the gas across the tubes) of this hot heat
exchanger would be passing to the converter.  There would be no
possibility of fouling of this heat exchanger provided it was pro-
perly designed and operated.
     A hot heat exchanger which has been properly designed would not
present any abnormal operations or maintenance provided the proper
materials for construction were selected.  Therefore, a refractory-
lined head, stainless steel tube sheet, and tubes have been selected
as the required material of construction for this design.  In
later sections of this report and Appendix K, the flow scheme and
equipment of this plant are described in more detail.
     Using a chilled water gas cooler (condenser), essentially
the same as used at Onahama, will not consume any power under
normal operations.  This is not true of the Onahama process.
Operating at a gas flow of 170,00 Nm /hr (100,000 scfm) entering
the sulfuric acid plant converter as the base point, the plant is
only slightly less than twice the size of the Onahama plant.
                                  107

-------
Also, considerably less recovered energy is used than the purchased
energy used at Onahama.  Besides the energy taken from the rever-
beratory gases for preheat, a somewhat unique feature is incorporated
whereby the energy required for refrigeration is recovered from
that normally wasted in the sulfuric acid absorption tower acid
coolers.   This is accomplished by the addition of a  superheater
located in the hot gas stream before the absorption tower.
      A somewhat similar heat recovery system has been proposed and
used in Japan by Ishikawajima - Harima Heavy Industries Company, Ltd.
This company has head offices in Tokyo, Japan.  The Ishikawajima Heat
Recovery Process (Appendix K-2) uses a Rankine cycle heat recovery system.
The system used by Ishikawajima starts with a liquid-fed pump, pumping
Freon (or another low boiling point fluid) through two sets of heat
exchangers in series.  The first heat exchanger is a liquid heater
and the second heat exchanger is a Freon boiler.  Hot sulfuric acid
from the absorption tower is cooled by these two heat exchangers in
countercurrent flow.  The Rankine cycle  heat  recovery from this
Ishikawajima system permits saturated Freon to flow to an expander
turbine where the saturated vapor leaving the boiler is expanded.
In the turbine, energy is recovered and  the vapor is then vented at
lower pressure into the condenser.  The  Freon leaving the condenser
goes to a receiving tank and is then recycled and pumped back  into
the system again.  At the present time,  Allied Chemical Company is
currently operating a pilot plant to recover  heat on one or more of
their sulfuric acid plants using this type  process.  The  data  included
in Appendix  K is  from Allied  Chemical  Company on  energy conservation
through the  application of a  low temperature  Rankine cycle using a
similar system.
      The  difference between  the Ishikawajima/Allied Chemical
  Company  process  and  the  Browder  process is that  the Freon  is
  used more  efficiently by superheating  the saturated vapor  leaving
  the (acid  cooler)  boiler in  the  latter process.   This  is accomp-
  lished by  passing  the  saturated  vapor  from the  Freon  boiler  to
  a  superheater located between  the  sulfuric acid  plant  cold  heat
                                  108

-------
exchanger and the absorption tower.  This superheater greatly
increases the temperature of the Freon vapor and also increases
the enthalpy, thereby allowing for a higher energy recovery level
of the vapor going to the expansion turbine.  This improved
feature permits three times the power recovery in KW than that
used in the Allied Chemical Company Report.  In the flow scheme
of the Allied application (Appendix K), the Freon is heated
from 41°C to 88°C (105°F to 190°F)  before passing into the expansion
turbine.  The enthalpy of the saturated boiler exit Freon is 132
Btu per pound at the saturated vapor temperature of 88°C (190°F).
After leaving the expander at 41°C (105°F), the Freon enthalpy is
121 Btu per pound, leaving a differential enthalpy of 11 Btu per
pound of Freon for available work recovered in the expander tur-
bine.   The Browder process heats the Freon from the saturated con-
dition to a superheated condition of between 140°C and 150°C (280°F
and 300°F) which has an enthalpy in excess of 154 Btu per pound of
Freon.   This, when expanded through the expander turbine, will  yield
154 minus 121 or 33 Btu per pound of Freon which is three times the
heat recovered in the Allied process and is used for refrigeration.
     Water chillers similar to those in the Onahama Refining and
Smelting Plant are used.  These can be purchased as standard units
from refrigeration manufacturers such as York, Carrier, or others.
Package water chillers are readily available in the range of 90 to
650 tons of refrigeration.  These package units usually are motor-
driven; however, they can be purchased without the electric motors
or can be purchased with electric motors with shaft extensions or
additional turbine expander drives.  The flowsheet (Figure 4-4) shows
superheated Freon vapor passing through an expansion turbine which
operates the water chillers and, thereby, eliminates the electric
power used to chill water for the secondary condensers (gas coolers
used in the system).  It would be suggested that the water chillers
still have electric motors which could be used for startup purposes
only until the sulfuric acid plant was generating sufficient heat
and the acid cooling system was operating the water chillers with
no additional electric  power required.
                                 109

-------
     An alternate approach (See Section 4.5)  to use the refrigera-
tion for maintaining water balance is considered when concentrated
acid is available from other adjacent sulfuric acid plants.   The
available 98 percent acid is simply added to  the system to maintain
the 93 percent concentration.   It should also be noted that in some
cases more dilute acid (i.e.,  77 percent) may be desired product
particularly if it can be used locally such as for leaching purposes.
This also would obviate the refrigeration system.
     This system uses proven components, design  concepts and  sub-
systems  but has not  been  tried even at the pilot plant level.  Thus,
additional experimental work is required to confirm the concept.
     The hot gas heat exchanger design is critical to the operation
and could be subject to erosion,  tube warpage or oxidation of
metal  parts.   If the design concept is correct,  it will not plug.

4.5  ALTERNATE APPROACH TO CONTROL WATER BALANCE

       In order to achieve water balance in a sulfuric acid plant,
the gas must be substantially cooled to maintain the correct  ratio
of water vapor volume to  SCL (SCL equivalent) in order to manufac-
ture sulfuric acid.  A curve is given on page K-32, Appendix  K,
which  shows the cooling requirements for various gas strengths
based  on an inlet pressure to the sulfuric acid plant of 600 mm
mercury.  This is equivalent to approximately 1,500 m (5,000 ft)
altitude.
     To offset the cost of refrigeration, existing sulfuric acid
plants which occasionally use weak S02 gases and other plants with
an available source  of 98 percent or stronger sulfuric acid,  can
use it as a dehydrating agent.  This is accomplished by diluting
the 98 percent or stronger acid in the drying tower to make a 93
percent or weaker acid and eliminates the need for refrigeration.
     The metallurgical complex located at Torreon, approximately
500 miles north of Mexico, has a total of three sulfuric acid
systems.  Two plants operate on relatively strong gas and can
                                 110

-------
produce 98 percent sulfuric acid which is normally sent to storage.
In 1975, Latisa (a Mexican subsidiary of the Ralph M. Parsons Company)
built a sulfuric acid plant for Met-Mex Penolis in Torreon.  This
sulfuric acid plant has a nominal rated capacity of 500 tons per day
of sulfuric acid using lead sintering machine offgas.  The sintering
machine performance was such that only very weak gases were produced;
it did not meet the design levels of 4-1/2 to 6-1/2 percent S02 for acid
plant feed.  There are great extended periods of time in this plant when
the gas strength is in the range of 1 to 1-1/2 percent SOp.  During
these periods, 98 percent sulfuric acid is pumped from the storage tanks
and fed directly into the drying tower pump tank and recirculated over
the drying tower.   The drying tower acid, after it has been diluted
to 93 percent, is then sent to another storage tank which stores the acid.
     There have been other cases of using predrying tower acid for
achieving water balance in sulfuric acid plants.   The Dupont Com-
pany in the United States operates a number of ordinance plants and
regeneration sulfuric acid plants.  These plants  decompose acid
which is converted into S0? and water vapor in the presence of de-
composed hydrocarbons.  This gas, after being cooled and cleaned,
is passed through  an electrostatic precipitator and then into a
predrying tower.   The predrying tower produces a  product of 60 Be1
(77.67 percent hLSOJ.  If there is a market for  this particular
grade of acid, then the predrying tower system can be used.  Sixty
degree Be' acid is one of the old standard product acids which is
used in the manufacture of normal superphosphate  fertilizer.   Addi-
tionally, in Europe, Mechim and Lurgi have built  sulfuric acid
plants with predrying towers which have been used to manufacture
weak acid or dirty acids from metallurgical plants.  Several  of
these plants have  been built by Mechim for their  own use in metal-
lurgical complexes.
     One plant which is well known which uses a predrying tower
arrangement is in  Bor, Yugoslavia.  This is about 150 miles south-
east of Beograd.   In this particular plant, weak S0_ gas is passed
first into a predrying tower and then into a secondary drying

                                 111

-------
tower which operates at the normal  93 to 94 percent acid.   The
predrying tower produces 60 degree  Be'  acid (77.67 percent acid).
This acid at the Bor complex is used to produce normal  superphos-
phate.  Therefore, the technology of using stronger sulfuric acid
as a diluting agent to replace refrigeration is known,  and there
are essentially no difficulties with designing systems  to function
using this technology.
                                 112

-------
                             SECTION 5
               FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) SYSTEMS
5.1  GENERAL
     Flue gas desulfurization systems may be classified as regen-
erative and nonregenerative with the former producing SOp as a more
concentrated gas and the latter generally converting it to a throw-
away product.  The nonregenerative systems essentially neutralize
the SOp and place it in a stable form which can then be disposed
of without any adverse effects to the environment.  Most regener-
ative systems absorb the SCL in a slurry and then regenerate it as
a more concentrated stream which can then be used for making either
liquid SOp^ sulfuric acid, or sulfur.  These products can, in turn,
be used to make additional byproducts.
     The presently accepted mode of collecting S02 in the copper
smelting industry is to use a sulfuric acid plant.  The gases from
fluid-bed roasters and converters are high enough in SOp concentra-
tion for direct processing in a conventional plant.   This is the
lowest cost approach to recovering a usable product.  However, 0.4
to 1.5 percent SO- average concentration in reverberatory furnace
offgases is not sufficiently high to directly process in a conven-
tional sulfuric acid plant (refer to Section 4.0).  In addition, west-
ern copper producers have, from time to time, had difficulties in
selling or using internally all of the acid they produce from con-
verters and fluid-bed roasters.  In those cases where the sulfuric
acid market is such that additional production is not desired, it
would seem logical that the nonregenerative systems  would be most
applicable to controlling SOp from the copper smelter reverberatory
furnace.  In those cases where a usable product is desired, then

                                113

-------
several  possible concentration systems have had sufficient exper-
ience at full-scale on reverberatory furnace offgases to be
acceptable.
     Of the nonregenerative throw-away systems, the one that has
received the most use (over 4 years) for collecting SCL from cop-
per smelter reverberatory furnace offgases is the lime/limestone
gypsum system presently being used on the reverberatory furnaces
at the Omahama Smelter in Japan.   The gypsum product is sold in
Japan.  Of all the potential regenerative (concentration) systems
that have been considered, the greatest metallurgical gas experience
has been with the MgO system used at the Onahama Smelter in Japan
and the colfd water absorption system at Bo!iden.  The MgO system
has been used for over 2 years on their copper reverberatory fur-
nace offgas.
     Additional concentration systems that have been operated in
metallurgical plants are the citrate and the ammonia systems used
to prepare gas for final processing to acid or sulfur.   One inter-
esting system that has been used  at full-plant scale, but not for
metallurgical processing, is the  Wellman-Lord sodium double alkali-
type system.  The double alkali systems may also be potassium or
ammonium based and are basically  designed to obviate the scaling,
plugging, and equipment erosion problems encountered with lime/
limestone base scrubbing systems.  However, the lime/limestone
system experience in Japan on reverberatory furnace offgases and
in the U.S.  on metallurgical offgases (Duval) would seem to indi-
cate that these latter problems have been solved.  However, the
double alkali systems retain the  capability of regenerating a
concentrated stream of SOo for production of a usable product.
     The product that is the most desirable from a storability and
shipping standpoint is sulfur.  While there are other successful
processes that can produce sulfur from S02 containing gas, the
only ones that were considered for this study were those using
coal as a reductant because of the current and probably future
supply problems with gas and oil.
                                 114

-------
     From operating experience with the MgO, and lime/limestone
to gypsum, ammonia, and probably the citrate (concentration only)
systems on copper smelter  reverberatory furnace offgases, it can
be said that from a technical standpoint, they are available to
control SCL emissions.  The question that remains, and must be
resolved by each individual smelter, is the economic one wherein
returns from sales or internal usage of potential products that can
result from the system must be compared to costs of disposal as
a waste product.  This is a very complex decision, as the future
acid market, although predicted to increase in the future (see
Section 5.11), will also be impacted by fuels desulfurization
processes as well as the regenerable flue gas desulfurization
systems employed at utility plants.
5.2  LIME/LIMESTONE S02 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR REVERBERATORY
     FURNACE OFFGASES AT THE ONAHAMA COPPER SMELTER
5.2.1  INTRODUCTION
     The development of the lime/limestone to gypsum SOo control
system has been carried out in Japan approximately 20 years at the
Hiroshima Technical Institute, one of the three R & D facilities
operated by Mitsubishi Metals Company in Japan.  During 1968 to
1972, they carried out an extensive program to investigate the
scaling problem which was occurring in scrubbers and the mist
eliminator of the pilot plant (Figure 5-1).
     It was found that preparation and operating conditions of
the absorbents were critical to scale formation and required the
proper range for pH, temperature, concentration, construction
material of the scrubber, L/G, uniformity of the streams, and
prevention of carryover mist to the eliminator.
     There was some bench scale testing at S02 concentrations of
20,000 ppm before the system for the Onahama Smelter reverberatory
furnace was constructed.   However, no pilot work was done
using the higher concentration, and the technology developed for
                                115

-------
                                                     ns

                                                     o.

                                                     -i->
                                                     O


                                                     Q-
                                                     O
                                                     +J
116

-------
 utilities was  transferred  at  that  time.   Additional  discussion  of
 the  detailed history  of the development of the Japanese lime/lime-
 stone  system by Mitsubishi is  included in Appendix K.

 5.2.2  ONAHAMA REVERBERATORY  FURNACE FEED
     Over 95 percent  of the concentrate processed at Onahama is
 received from abroad.  The concentrate is blended in a blending
yard or bedding plant and has an average moisture content  of 8  per-
 cent.  When it exceeds 10 percent,  the blended mixture is  dried  in  a
 kiln down to 6 percent.  Average concentrate contains 28 percent
 copper and 28.5 percent sulfur, and matte grade produced is 38
 percent.
     The green charge is transported to the two reverberatory furn-
 aces by the main feed conveyor belt.  It  is then transferred to
 furnace distributor belts as needed for furnace charging.
     There does not appear to be any effect on S02 emissions from
 the various concentrates processed.  They are generally blended
 into a more or less homogeneous charge mixture.
     Description of the reverberatory furnace is included in Sec-
 tion 5.  Bed recovery is by bucket loader into bin-type feeders
 which, in turn, feed  the main furnace feed belt.  Proportioned
 fluxes are likewise loaded into other bin-type feeders and added
 to the main belt at the desired rate.  Feed rates are controlled
 from the main smelter control room.

 5.2.3  LIME/LIMESTONE GYPSUM FLOW SYSTEM
     Figure 5-2 is a  schematic showing the lime/limestone gypsum
 flowsheet at the Onahama Smelter.   The flue gas coming from the
 reverberatory furnace waste heat boilers and Cottrells enters a
 wash tower which is a horizontal cylindrical vessel with sprays
 in both the inlet duct and along the length of the chamber.  Simple
 internal baffles increase the mixing inside the vessel.  The flue
 gas is cooled down to 60°C in the washing tower and then passes to

                                117

-------
                                                          4->
                                                          CO
                                                          00
                                                          Q.
                                                          
-------
5.2.4  DESIGN AND OPERATING CONDITIONS AT THE ONAHAMA SMELTER
5.2.4.1  Input Material and Preparation
     The chart in Figure 5-3 shows the S02 concentration entering
the gypsum plant in the reverberatory furnace offgas.  As can be
seen, it fluctuates over the period of time shown from a low of 2.1
percent to a high of 2.9 percent.  During this operating period,
there was no oxygen addition to the reverberatory furnaces.  How-
ever, both furnaces were operating, and production was nearly 75
percent of normal.
     As typical with any reverberatory furnace, the fluctuations result
from charging of feed material, slag return and metallurgical reaction.
In the first case an excess of S02 is generated immediately after
charging, and in the second case an opening is presented allowing addi-
tional dilution air to enter.  As discussed in Section 2.4, this pre-
centage of S02 is considerably higher than that reached by U.S. green
charge reverberatory furnaces.
     Any quick lime (CaO), slaked lime (CaCOH^), or limestone
(03063) can be used as absorbent.  The reaction rate of S0£
absorption by lime slurry depends on the dissolution rate of the
lirne.  Quick lime will, of course, provide a higher reactivity than
slaked lime which in turn provides a higher reactivity than lime-
stone.  In the case of limestone it is desirable to crush it into
about 300 mesh.  Carbide sludge  has also  been  found  to  be  a  low cost
source of slaked lime  and has.  been  used.   Quick  lime  has an  effec-
tive  Ca quantity per ton which is about 1.8 times as  large as  that
of limestone, which of course  proportionately  minimizes storing and
handling requirements.
     Absorbent preparation is somewhat different for these systems
depending upon whether lime or limestone is used.  As noted from the
general  description of the process by Mitsubishi:  "Quick lime  is
always stored in either large silos or a storage building until
ready to be used.  It is then transferred to a smaller silo equipped
with a gravimetric feed conveyer which meters a fixed amount into

                               119

-------
                                          o

                                          o
                                            OJ
                                          O
                                          
-------
five gas coolers.  A part of the circulating water is extracted to
filter away the collected dust, and the filtrate is returned to the
system.  The gas coolers are seawater which are indirectly cooled
heat exchangers that further cool  the gas.  The seawater is returned
to the ocean.
     The gas at this point may be separated, and part goes to the
MgO system and part goes to the following gypsurn system.  At the
present time, the MgO system is not being used, but the TCA scrubber
in the MgO system has been connected as an additional  absorber to
allow processing of a larger quantity of gas.  The two systems were
originally designed to handle the total offgas from the two rever-
beratory furnaces.  These furnaces are presently operating at re-
duced capacity, and the lack of demand for acid has eliminated the
need for the MgO system.
     Following the main cleaning system, the gas goes to the No.  1
absorber and then to the No. 2 absorber, each absorbing approximately
half of the S02 entering the system.   It then goes to the mist elimi-
nator, the blower, a precipitator, and finally the stack.  There  is
no exhaust gas reheat.  The blower is the main reverberatory furnace
blower and provides suction for the entire system which therefore
operates at negative pressure to this point.
     The absorbent flow rate through  the  No.  1 absorber  is  approx-
imately half of the absorbent flow rate of the No. 2  absorber.   A
series of six centrifugal pumps are used  to pump the  10  percent
slurry absorbent  in the No. 2 absorber circuit and a  series  of  three
pumps in the No.  1 absorber-absorbent circuit.  The large  number
of pumps is used  because of an installation space problem.
     The calcium  sulfite slurry is taken  from the No.  1  absorber at
pH 4-5 and pumped into a pH adjuster  where acid is used  to adjust
the pH to 3-4.  Approximately 200 m^ per hour flows to the three
oxidation towers.  A special rotary atomizer is used to mix the
compressed air entering the oxidation towers with the slurry.  The
oxidizing towers are indirectly cooled as required.

                                121

-------
     From the oxidizing towers, the gypsum slurry flows to the thick-
ener and approximately 20 percent of the flow goes to the lime tank
to supply seed crystals.  The seed crystals enter the absorption
system in the No. 2 absorber.  The addition of seed crystal gypsum
provides a sacrificial surface for crystal precipitation greatly
reducing and controlling deposition on absorber surfaces.
     The underflow from the gypsum thickener flows as a 25 percent
slurry to a tank through the pumps and then into a bank of 14 cen-
trifuges at a pH of 3-4.  From the centrifuges, the gypsum passes
through a belt to storage for shipment.  The liquid from the
centrifuges passes back to the gypsum thickener.
     The overflow from the gypsum thickener passes to a tank and
pump and then to either a cooling tower and the slaking system or
directly into the slaking system.  The thickener overflow is used
for slaking of the lime in the slaker.  The slaked material then
flows to a ball mill and a liquid cyclone.  The heavy material from
the liquid cyclone is passed back to the ball  mill.   Then, the light
material, which is lime milk, is then passed to the milk  holder  and
into the dilution tank.  From the dilution tank, the material  goes
to the lime seed tank and back into the No. 2 absorber.
     Excess water from the thickener overflow goes to the neutrali-
zation plant where lime is added to obtain a pH of 7 and then
to the ocean.  Water enters the system from pump seals, the spill
gas TCA from the smelter, collection systems, the oxidizing tower
atomizers, and the gas from the reverberatory furnace.  Condensate
from the gas coolers is sent to the water treatment section or it
may be used in the system if required.  A more detailed description
of individual components is included in Appendix M.
                                122

-------
the lime slurry tank.  Recycled water from the gypsum recovery sec-
tion is mixed with the lime to prepare a constant weight percent
slurry to be used as absorbent makeup."  Sizing of the lime parti-
cles by grinding (ball mill in slaking section) is necessary to
produce the proper pH because of the reactivity of the material.
     The limestone equipment required depends on the size of the
limestone commercially available to the scrubbing plant and the
physical distance between the limestone storage area and the
absorbers.  Since a 325 mesh limestone powder  is  desired for  the
qypsum production case,a ball mill qrinding  operation  is necessary.

    Generally, the limestone is ordered based on what is available
from the vendor.  They maintain fairly tight specifications on the
particle size.  The limestone is ordered to have the finest par-
ticle size available without specifying the  exact number.  If this
number were specified with a stricter requirement, it would probably
double the cost.  Presently, the limestone received as a slurry  by
Onahama is in the range of 200 to 500 mesh.
     The lime or limestone composition or the ratio of calcium
oxide to calcium carbonate will affect cost.  The limestone obtained
in Japan is approximately 57 percent CaO indicating a very pure
material.   As impurities increase, generally the cost of the limestone
decreases.

     For a new  application to a smelter it would  probably be advis-
able to begin with the maximum amount of CaO and  to decrease gradu-
ally to determine the final workable ratio under  the specific
conditions.   Presently, the mole ratio of CaO to  CaC03 is approxi-
mately  50 percent.

     Corrosion  tends to occur when chlorine or chlorides enter the
system.  The  initial cooler, which is a spray chamber, tends to
wash out these  materials.   Chlorine, up to  a maximum of  1,000 ppm
in  the  liquid phase  from the cooler, will  not  cause  corrosion.
                                123

-------
     Trace metals may be contained  in  the  flue  gas  entering  the
system and may include copper, cadmium, lead,  chromium and arsenic.
Also, zinc, magnesium and sodium may be present.
     The  following materials  are used at Onahama at the rate spe-
cified:
      • CaO is 7.3 tons per hour as calcium  hydroxide
      • ^$04 is 0.1  tons per hour
      • Electric power required is  230 kWh  per  ton  of  product  which
        includes blowers, pumps, and associated equipment  -  this
        averages 4,000 to 5,000 kWh
      • Compressed air is 300 standard cubic meters per minute
      • Cooling, pump seal, and miscellaneous water (sea and fresh)
        is 6,000 to 8,000 m3 per day.

 5.2.4.2  Internal Operating Conditions
      The flue gases are prequenched in the flue gas cooler to ap-
proximately the adiabatic saturation temperature by evaporation
of water  sprayed  into the system.  The gases are cooled to approxi-
mately 60°C and then sent to gas coolers for further cooling.  This
additional cooling is required  to maintain absorption efficiency.
The temperature of the gas remains essentially constant until it
reaches the stack.  No stack  reheat is done at the Onahama Smelter
because apparently the visible  water vapor from the stack  is not
objectionable to  the local residents.
      After the flue gas has been prequenched, it enters the first
absorber where lime and limestone slurry is  sprayed through spray
nozzles located at the top of the absorber.   The  pH of the slurry at
the circulation pump  discharge is controlled by adding makeup lime/
limestone slurry to the circulation tank.
      As the flue gas passes through the absorber, some droplets of
slurry are entrained.   These drops  are removed by using a  chevron
plate-type mist eliminator.   Recycled water from the neutralization
plant  is  used for continuous  washing  of its surfaces.
                                 124

-------
     The relative S02 absorption between Nos. 1 and 2 absorbers
has changed as experience has developed.  Presently, it is closer to
a 50 to 50 percent relationship.  The pH of the absorbent is gener-
ally less than seven in both absorbers.
      It has been found that scaling or crystalization of the
calcium sulfite occurs as either many small crystals, as a layer
on the surface of equipment, or as layers built on seed crystals.
If the formation of the calcium sulfite can be controlled to a rate
below the rate of crystal growth on the seed crystals, then the
crystal nucleation will preferentially go to these seed crystals.
However, if the calcium sulfite rate of formation exceeds the rate of
crystalization on the seed crystals, or if there are not sufficient
seed crystals present, then crystalization will occur either as
scaling on the surface of the equipment or as formation of small new
freestanding crystals.  Thus, for a given solubility of calcium sul-
fite, the concentration of calcium sulfite in the liquid phase must be
controlled.  This can be done by controlling either the L/G in the
absorber or the flow rate of the seed crystals to the absorption
circuit.  According to the above theory, the lower the SC^
concentration, the less scaling will occur.

      Because of the scaling problem and also because of the fluc-
tuation of the S02 concentration, design of the internal  conditions
of the system is critical  (see Figure 5-3).  There has not been
any serious problems with operation of the gypsum system within the
range of fluctuations occurring at the Onahama Smelter.   However,
the following  design considerations  (Mitsubishi considers the  details
of some of the following  to  be  proprietary)  must be optimum to pro-
vide a flexible system:
       1.  Selection of the optimum slurry  velocities  in
          the  piping
       2.  Proper  application of instrumentation
       3.  Optimum equipment selection  and  application
       4.  Special piping features in  the  problem  areas
                               125

-------
      During operation,  the size of gypsum crystals,  and scaling
are controlled by the following:
       • The pH of the slurry
       • The temperature of the slurry
       • The speed of oxidation (air pressure)

      Size of the crystal does not affect plugging or scaling.   The
gypsum board manufacturers require large crystals.  Large crystals
are easily centrifuged, but the smaller size is  more difficult to
separate in the centrifuge causing a higher water content in the
gypsum.  Also, small size tends to produce vibration.
      The pH of the slurry is controlled very closely as it  leaves the
absorption system and enters the oxidation towers at  3 to 4.   The  per-
cent S02 leaving the oxidizer is less than 200  ppm.  When sulfuric
acid is used to contrdl  pH, there will be an increase in S02 at this
point which can be variable.  Speed of oxidation is controlled by the
                                                   p
pressure of the oxidizer, nominally 43 psi (3 kg/cm  gauge).

      The lowest pH occurs at the oxidizer tower, and the first
gas cooler.   The gas cooler pH is less than one.  The slurry
leaves the thickener at  approximately 3 to 5 and enters either the
slaking system or goes out to the neutralization tank where it is
modified to a pH of 7 before leaving for the ocean.  The fluid
leaving the gypsum centrifuge has a pH of approximately 3 to 4.

5.2.4.3  Output Conditions and Materials
      •  Output SO?
      The chart in Figure 5-4 shows a trace of output S02 versus
time for the gypsum system.  Output varies from  0 to a maximum
peak of 133 ppm with the average approximately 40 to 60 ppm.
      •  Gypsum
      The gypsum crystals are controlled  to meet the requirements
of the wall board manufacturers.  Generally, a crystal  shape which
is bulky is desired to minimize adhered water  (see Figure 5-5).

                                 126

-------
                                         DL.

                                         D_


                                         O

                                         O

                                         O
                                         CJ3
                                         o
                                         *—I

                                         £
                                         C£
                                         I—

                                         UJ
                                         o

                                         o
                                         o

                                          C\J
                                         o
                                         00

                                         oo
                                         <£.
                                         CD
                                        oo
                                        D-
                                        >-
                                        cr>

                                        UJ
                                        ^
                                        o
                                         £
                                         3
                                         CD
127

-------
Note:   (200x) CaS04.2 H20 (left), CaS04.l/2 H20 (right),
       CaS03.l/2 H20 (bottom)
            Figure 5-5.   Crystal  Comparison
                           128

-------
If the crystals are large and bulky they have a low surface-to-
volume ratio which minimizes external water content.   The long
crystals are desirable from a strength standpoint but do tend to
have an excess in associated water.  The production at Onahama
varies from 5 to 10 percent adhered water and is approximately 98
percent pure gypsum.  For the cement industry,  color  or impurities
are important factors.  If the crystals are very slightly yellow,
this tends to relate to larger size crystals.  If the crystals are
all white, they tend to be smaller in size.  Figure 5-5 shows photo-
graphs of CaS04»2H20, CaS04»l/2H20, and CaS03»l/2 H20 crys-
tals at 200 to 300 times magnification.  The calcium  sulfate  crys-
tals with one-half molecule of water are considerably smaller than
those with the two water molecules.  The bulk CaSO^h^O are  the
desired configuration.

      The chemical requirements for the gypsum are as follows:
      • CaO -32.5 percent b.w.
      • $03 -45.8 percent b.w.
      • Residual CaO less than 0.1 percent.
      Almost continuous inspection of the gypsum crystals produced
 by the gypsum system is maintained.   A microscope of 200 to  300
 magnification is located in the  gypsum system control  room,  and
 slides of the product are made and viewed at this point.  The micro-
 scope used is a standard metallurgical microscope and  has a  polaroid
 camera attachment for taking instant development pictures which are
 taken once or twice each shift.   When the crystals do  not appear to
 be the proper shape the system is adjusted, but there  is  a consider-
 able lag  time between the adjustment and the change  in the product.
 Material  unsuitable for wallboard is most likely sold  to cement
 manufacturers.
      Magnesium of 1  percent (usually 0.2 percent as  magnesium oxide)
 is the maximum allowable in the  wall  board gypsum.   The silicon
 dioxide is usually less than 1 percent, but it is not  too critical.
                                129

-------
      •  Mater
      A schematic of the wastewater treatment plant at the Onahama
Smelter is shown in Figure 5-6.   This system receives waste from
the acid, the gypsum, and the magnesium oxide plants as well  as the
general wastewater plant.
      From the receiver tank,the effluent goes to a mixing tank
where milk of lime is added.  This is followed by three neutraliz-
ing tanks allowing the material  to reach a pH of approximately 7.
From the neutralizing tanks, the fluid goes to a tank where coagulant
is added and is then passed to a thickener.
     The underflow from the thickener goes to a centrifuge and
this solid material is then taken to the reverberatory furnace.
The overflow from the thickener goes to a tank where milk of lime
is added, and further neutralization occurs with sodium hydroxide
in the two following tanks to reach a pH of between 11 and 12.   In
the following tank, organic coagulant is added and this is then
passed to another thickener.
      The underflow from the second thickener goes to filter presses,
and the solids  are then taken to the reverberatory furnace.  The
overflow  from the thickener passes to two settling pits and even-
tually  on to  the ocean.

      •   Trace  Metals
       Trace metals are  handled  so  as to  cause them to  go  out  in
the reverberatory furnace  slag.  The dust from the reverberatory
furnace Cottrells goes  to  the local  zinc  plant where  the  trace
 metals are  removed.   Lime is  added to  the water  treatment plant to
 control  pH,  COD, total  suspended solids and trace metals.  In
 addition, the following materials  are  checked to determine if they
 are present:   zinc,  copper, manganese,  fluorine, total  chromium,
 lead, arsenic cyanide,  phosphorus, nickel,  soluble iron,  cadmium,
 hexavalent  chromium.   Arsenic  may be as high as  50 ppm in the
 concentrate,  however,  it generally averages only 3 ppm.
                                130

-------
                                                        to
                                                        ol
                                                        +->
                                                        I
                                                        4->
                                                        (O
                                                        0)
                                                        s-
                                                        O)
                                                        (O
                                                       3
                                                        CO
                                                        ro
                                                       O
                                                       O
                                                       O
                                                       
-------
     The first stage in the water treatment plant (where pH of 7
is controlled) in effect reduces the Ca(C03) to calcium sulfate,
water and carbon dioxide.  The second stage (where pH of 11 is
obtained with sodium hydroxide and impurities such as cadmium,
arsenic and copper are precipiated out) is very near the optimum
range from this precipitation.  Professor Tozawa of Tohoku Uni-
versity presented a paper at a symposium on water treatment in
Sendai, Japan, on January 20, 1977.  This data is shown in Figure 5-7.
This indicates that the best pH for precipitating arsenic as
Ca3(AsO.)2 is from 11.7 to 13.0 under the conditions where Ca-As(V)
molal ratio  is 3 to 1 or higher.  The higher molal ratio is preferred
to reduce the Ca(V) concentration in the solution.  This statement
agreed well with the operational conditions of the Onahama water
treatment plant where the end of the second series of neutraliza-
tion  (alkalization) is maintained at the pH close to 12.
      It is also of interest to note that heating Ca3(AsO.)2 to
600°C or higher in air makes this compound more stable so that
it will not  leach out even in media having pH 7-14.  This tech-
nique is practiced at the Hibi Smelter of Mitsui Metals and Min-
ing Company  in Japan, but has not been attempted at Onahama.
5.2.4.4  System Cleaning
      The absorption towers are cleaned of scale once every 6
months.  These are washed down with water for approximately 10
hours.  The  plastic grid packings are removed and physically
scrubbed.  The scale generally is relatively soft and comes off
easily.  Likewise, the mist catcher is cleaned two times a year
at the same time as cleaning of the absorption towers.   This de-
vice is cleaned by high pressure water sprays as required.
5.2.4.5  Plant Area
      The area required for the Onahama gypsum system is approxi-
mately 65 by 40 m or 2,600 m2.  This is exclusive of the compressor
house, the gypsum storage house,  and the slaking section which could
add another 2,000 m2.

                               132

-------
0.20
0.16
0.12
0.08
0.04 .
                                 Ca-As(V)(Molar ratio)
                                                3.2
     7      8      9      10     11      12      13      14
                            PH

     Initial  As(V)  = 1.0  g/1. at  room  temperature  1  hour



     Figure 5-7.  ARSENIC PRECIPITATION  CONDITIONS
                        133

-------
 5.2.4.6  Operating Personnel
       The  gypsum  system,  the  MgO  plant,  the  water  treatment  plant,
 and  the  spill  gas handling  system are  operated  by  a  crew of  five  men
 and  one  foreman for each shift.  In addition, a maintenance crew of
 three people is used.   This would then require  27  people.*
      The entire pollution control  effort at  the smelter  uses a total
 crew of  approximately  40.   This compares to  200 for  the  smelting
 operation.

 5.2.5  APPLICATION  OF  THE ONAHAMA LIME/LIMESTONE SCRUBBING SYSTEM
        TO  U.S. SMELTERS
      The gypsum system used at  Onahama was one  of  the  early  ones
 designed so  it included  pumps with  water seals  which require a rela-
 tively large amount  of water.   Approximately 2,400 m3/day is re-
 quired for pump seal water.   Present designs do not  use  this type of
 pump seal.
      Washing tower water  of approximately 300 m3 per day goes to
 the  water  treatment  section.  The oxidizer towers  use  approximately
 300  m3/day for atomizer  seals and this also  goes into  the system.
 Compressor cooling,  blower  cooling, and  miscellaneous  water  usage
 such as  cleaning  shoes and  so forth uses an  additional 1,000 m3/day.
The gas coolers use 1,000 m /hr maximum  and  of course  this cooling
                                             3
water could be recycled.  A total  of 6,000 m  /day  of water goes to
the ocean after treatment in the neutralization tank.
      The actual water  lost, if  the system were designed  to reduce or
minimize this  factor,  is that going out  the  stack  at saturated condi-
 tion  and that  in the gypsum.  This is  approximately  48 m3/day  for
the Onahama Smelter.   Miscellaneous water would be an  addition to
this.  Input water that could be  available is that entering  the
system in the  flue gas.  Appendix M presents  calculations  for the
water balance  at the Onahama Smelter under the  present operating
 f(5+l)  x 4+3 = 27
                                 134

-------
conditions of 2,000 Nm /min (70,600 scfm)  showing  sources  and
emissions of water which can be summarized as:
     Water in flue gas                             593 ib/min
     Water in gas at outlet of                     735 ]b/m-jn
       washing tower
     Water in gas at outlet of                     333
       gas coolers
     Water removed from flue gas                   453 Ib/min
     Water entering washing tower                  192  Ib/min
                                                             i
     Water entering system from pump seals       3,673  Ib/min
     Water entering system from atomizer
       seals                                       459 Ib/min
     Water entering system from spill  gas
       TCA                                       Ml 3  Ib/min
     Water entering system from miscel-
       laneous sources                           1,071 Ib/min
     Total water entering system
       333 + 3,673 + 459 + 1,613 + 1,071  =       M49 Ib/min
     Water leaving neutralization tank           6,636 Ib/min
     Water leaving cooling section                 333 Ib/min
     Water leaving with gypsum                     I80 Ib/min
     Total water leaving system =
       9,186 + 198 + 459                         7,149 Ib/min
       (Exclusive of evaporation and purge
        losses)

        With a system designed for minimum water use, at least the
following must be accomplished:
         1.  Selection of equipment such as pumps and rotary atomizers
             to use water as little as possible (minimize seal  require-
             ments).
         2.  Minimizing the amount of water to be treated at the
             water treatment plant by reducing the  dust load in
             the gas at the inlet of such plants.
         3.  Separation of gypsum saturated water and non-gypsum
             containing water.
         4-  Multi-utilization of water by recycling  from the water
             treatment plant.
                                 135

-------
The following projected water balance is estimated, assuming
the above factors are implemented:

Water in flue gas entering gas conditioning system    593 Ib/min
Water in flue gas leaving gas conditioning
  system, WgC                                         269 Ib/min
Water loss in washing tower and gas
  cooler section, We (assume 10 percent
  purge and 20 percent evaporation)                    81 Ib/min
Water leaving in gypsum,  Wg                           198 Ib/min
Water lost by evaporation, Ws                         735 Ib/min
Total  water out of the gypsum system Wet
  We + Wg + Ws = 81  + 198 + 735 =                   1,014 Ib/min
Total  water required (not including
  miscellaneous)
  Wet - Wgc = 1,014 - 269 =                           745 Ib/min (90gpm)
     The limestone in Japan is a very pure material  with practically
100 percent CaCO,.  It assays at approximately 57 percent CaO which
could indicate that even some of the carbonate has weathered away.
In the U.S., limestone is never pure calcium carbonate, but always
contains variable percentages of foreign matter usually magnesium
carbonate, clay, silica, compounds of iron and aluminum, and fre-
quently fossil remains.  Limestone is mined in all but three or
four of the states with Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York,
and Michigan in the order named leading in production of broken
stone for all technical purposes.  More than half is used in the
construction of roads and in making concrete.  Large amounts are
utilized as a flux in separating metals from their ores and in
powdered form for neutralizing the acid present in certain soils.
It is the source of all commercial lime and in addition has numerous
                                  •
minor uses.  In large quarried rocks, it is our principal building
stone.
     Large quantities of limestone are located in Arizona.  Analysis
of this limestone varies, but typically contains 50 to 52 percent
                                 136

-------
 CaO  approximately  comparable  to  that  used  at  Onahama  at  57  percent.
 Magnesium  content  may  vary  from  that  of  dolomite  to essentially  none.
 Other constituents  such  as  silica  can  vary significantly from  deposit
 to deposit.

      The Gypsum Association of Los Angeles was contacted to deter-
mine the market for gypsum in the Western United States  (west of the
Mississippi).  They stated that gypsum is mined in California,
Nevada, Utah, Iowa, southern Oklahoma, Texas,  Arizona, and New
Mexico.  There is substantial  quantities of gypsum produced as a
byproduct from the chemical  industry and power plants, and the  mar-
ket for gypsum at the present time is not very encouraging.   Gyp-
sum is open pit-mined in Arizona near Hayden so it would seem that
if it were produced as a product from pollution control facilities,
it would have to be sold at a price that would at the very least,
compete with existing mines.
      Considerable effort has been expended to reduce the infil-
tration air into the furnaces by leakage point elimination  (refer  to Sec-
tion 3.0).   The S02 concentration from these furnaces is considerably
higher than that reported by U.S. smelters.  The lower concentration
would actually be beneficial to the operation of a lime/limestone
gypsum system although it would, of course, result in higher volume
flows since it is caused by infiltration air and furnace operations.
      Considerable improvement in system design and develoo-
ment of operational know-how has occurred at the Onahama Smelter
during the  startup and subsequent operation of the gypsum system.
It is this  detailed experience that the Mitsubishi Metals Corpora-
tion personnel feel is absolutely essential to operate the gypsum
plant without plugging and other troubles.
      There has been no experience with the gypsum system treating
coal-fired  reverberatory furnace offgases.   As the amount of carbon
dioxide in  the gas may increase, the CaCO,  scale phenomena in the
        milk absorbing system could change.
                                 137

-------
      It is believed that there would be no major problems when
applying the gypsum system to calcine charge reverberatory furnace
offgases.  On the contrary, it would present a favorable condition
to the design and operation of the plant because of the reduced con-
centration of SOp.

5.3  DUVAL SIERRITA LIME SCRUBBER SO? CONTROL SYSTEM
5.3.1  INTRODUCTION
      A lime slurry sulfur dioxide scrubbing system is currently being
operated to control  offgases from two multihearth roasters processing
molybdenum copper ores at the Duval Sierrita Company processing plant
near Tucson, Arizona.   The scrubbing system receives gases containing
0.35 to 0.75 percent S0£ concentration and treats them to emit gases
to the atmosphere at less than 200 ppm.
      This S02 control system has been under development since 1968.
At that time,the company made an extensive survey to select an S02
control  system to treat the offgases from the roasters.  The system
was designed and implemented in late 1970 and had continuing difficul-
ties until approximately 1973.  The development effort resulted in
an improvement from 65 percent availability to the present 95
percent availability.   Sulfur dioxide removal  efficiency is in the
range of 92 to 96 percent.

5.3.2  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
     Figure 5-8 is a schematic showing the roaster and scrubbing
system flowsheet.  Each roaster has an identical parallel system.
The roaster offgases are first passed through a series of four cyclone
dust collectors.  After passing through the system to the precipitator
inlet, the temperature is reduced.  The electrostatic precipitator is
at least 99.5 percent efficient and cleans the gases of the remaining
particulate.  The gases are then passed directly into a TCA type scrub-
ber.  The temperature is reduced by spraying in water to ensure di-
                                 138

-------
                                                      §
                                                     4->
                                                      CO
                                                      O)
                                                     +J
                                                      
139

-------
 mensional stability of the 7 gram polypropylene balls used as the
 mixing medium  in the scrubber.

      The gases pass through three stages of balls presently at a
6-in stagnant thickness  for each layer.  The lime slurry is sprayed
downward countercurrently to the gas  flow through six spray nozzles.
After passing through the three ball  stages, the gases then go through
a vane type demister before leaving the scrubber.  A Brinks mist
eliminator follows the scrubber and was included in the system to
improve the removal  of the acid mist.  A fan is located downstream  of
this mist eliminator at the base of the stack.  The exit temperature
out the stack is approximately 114°F, and the exit gas varies from  100
to 200 ppm of SO,,.


5.3.3  INPUT CONDITIONS
       The mined  ore contains both copper sulfide and molybdenum
disulfide.   These two materials are separated by flotation.  The
copper sulfide  is sent to  an outside smelter for further processing.
The molybdenum  sulfide is  processed in the  roaster.  The feed to the
roaster contains approximately  50 percent molybdenum and 35 percent
sulfur.
       Approximately 10 to  15 percent of the total molybdenum disulfide
is sold directly as a product.  The remainder is processed in the
roaster to form  molybdenum trioxide.

5.3.4  INTERNAL  PROCESSING
      There are  11 hearths  in the  roaster with the upper two
hearths fired by gas  burners to supply ignition  heat.   Once the  moly-
bdenum disulfide reaches  ignition temperature,  it burns by itself  to
oxidize most of  the sulfur.  The  lower four hearths  also  have  burners
which  are  used  to drive  off the last 1 percent  of the  sulfur.  Excess
air  is injected  into  the  multihearth roaster which operates at an
average  feed rate of  1.7  ton/hr.

                                  140

-------
      The gases from the roaster entering the scrubber contain the
 following:
                          CO  - 0.1%
                          C02 - 0.9%
                         H20  - 14.6%
                         S02  - 0.35 to 0.75%
      The lime slurry circuit for the scrubber operates at approximately
2,500 gal /mi n flow rate.  After the 5 percent solid lime slurry
has been sprayed into the scrubber and contacted the gases, it leaves
from the bottom at a pH of 6.   The scrubber effluent is passed
into a weir box to meter the flow.  From the weir box, the slurry
passes into the mixing tank which has an agitator and is used to con-
trol a pH to approximately 6.5 by lime addition at this point.
      It has been found that the concentration of calcium hydroxide
to pH relationship is nonlinear and is shown in the curve of Figure
5-9.   The operator tries to maintain the system on the 6.5 to 7 pH
plateau.  If the pH goes beyond this, it tends to become overly sensi-
tive to lime addition and can become as high as 10 very rapidly.
     The lime is added to the mixing tank in a 14 percent slurry.  This
slurry is prepared elsewhere in the plant because the material is also
used for another process.   A 100 gal/min bleed  is taken from the
system on a continuous basis and is passed  to the tailings
impoundment dam.

     It is estimated that recovery of water from the tailings pond
is in the 30 to 40 percent range.  Three to five percent of the total
sulfur input is SO-.  Total particulate out of the stack, including
both liquid and solid, is nominally 8 Ib/hr.
      The pressure drop across the scrubber will nominally be 13
inches of water but can go as high as 17- in  of water.   The  main
fan at the base of the stack pulls approximately 38 to 40-in

                                  141

-------
                                             Operating
                                               Range
       10
       7.5
 PH
       2.5
                                    Mol Ca(OH)2

      Figure 5-9.  The pH Versus Calcium Hydroxide Concentration
of water.  The Brinks mist eliminator produces approximately 7-in
of water pressure drop.
      The roaster is operated under negative pressure but very close
to atmospheric.  It is a relatively new roaster and is in very good
condition.  There is very little evidence of SOp in the roaster area
when compared to roasters at some of the smelters  in Arizona.

       Considerable development work has been carried out to determine
 the loading of the balls within the scrubber.  The original scrubber
 design is a UOP model  TCA No.  500.   This design has been modified by
 Duval.  Presently, they use three stages of a 6 inch layer (static)
 of 7 gram balls.  Screens are  located between the layers, and the
 height between the screens is  approximately 30-in.
                                  142

-------
      The development work on the scrubber indicated that the balls
must be floating or "teetering" in the gas stream in a position  rela-
tively in between the two screens.   If the balls are operated too close
to  the upper screen, then blinding or blockage  to flow occurs.   If the
balls are operated  too  low or close  to the bottom screen,then the gas
flow is again restricted.

5.3.5  SYSTEM OPERATION
      It is necessary to shutdown the system a total of 6 hr/wk  to
enter the scrubbers and chip out the scale.  This down-time falls
within the State of Arizona regulations in terms of total S0£ col-
lected.  Scrubber screens are generally replaced once every 6 months.
Balls must be replaced every 3 to 5 months.  Some cracking of the
balls at the seams occurred; however, this has recently been corrected
by  a modified ball design.
      Operation of  the  system is primarily controlled by pH of  the
slurry leaving the  bottom of the scrubber.  However, the quantity of
the balls (which is adjusted by the  static thickness of the ball
layer) and the weight of the ball are also influencing factors.  It
is  very easy for the system to become unstable from the pH standpoint
and then the operation  essentially goes out of control.  As seen in
the curve in Figure 5-9, if the pH is in the steeper portion of  the
curve the system tends  to become critical from a control standpoint.
Operation in the stable pH zone of four is not conducive to high
scrubber efficiency.  The best compromise has  been found operating
at  a set point of about 6.5.  Even at this set point there are wide
swings of the pH,however, the system does stay in control since  it
has  a  time  constant sufficient  to  shut off the lime once the pH begins
to rise in  time for the pH to return to a stabilized position.    Fluctua-
tions  of the input S02  within the  normal  range do not seem to affect
the  system operation.
                                 143

-------
has a time constant sufficient to shut off the lime once the pH begins
to rise in time for the pH to return to a stabilized position.  Fluct-
uations of the input S(L within the normal range do not seem to
affect the system operation.
5.3.6  APPLICATION OF DUVAL LIME SCRUBBING SYSTEM TO REVERBERATORY
       FURNACES
      While the Duval Lime Scrubbing System is operating on metallur-
gical gases emitted from multi hearth roasters, the problems are simi
lar to reverberatories particularly since the S02 concentration is
in the 0.3 to 0.75 percent concentration range.  The gas temperature
(entering the S0£ system), particulate cleaning, and water content
are the same or very similar.  Since this system has been at satis-
factory full-scale operation since 1973 it, at the very least, con-
firms the Japanese experience.
5.4  MAGNESIUM OXIDE S02 CONCENTRATION SYSTEM FOR REVERBERATORY
     FURNACE OFFGASES AT THE ONAHAMA COPPER SMELTER
5.4.1  HISTORY
     The development and installation of the magnesium oxide S02
concentration system at the Onahama Smelter was  performed as a joint
effort between the Tsukishima Kikai Company (TSK) and Mitsubishi
Metals Corporation.  TSK is an independent organization devoted to
engineering  and  construction of major industrial  plants and
equipment.
     Development was started approximately 8 years ago in 1969 and
required approximately 3 years to complete.  The development phase
consisted  primarily of the 1/400 laboratory scale and then the l/20th
scale efforts.   Most of this work took place at  the  Onahama Smelter.
     The problems  investigated during the development were the energy
required,  scaling, plugging, and the absopriton  capacity.  It was
                                 144

-------
 decided  to  use  the magnesium  oxide  process  to  concentrate  S02  from
 the  reverberatory furnace offgas  for direct  acid  plant  processing at
 the  time because  in  comparison  to other  processes,  particularly  the
 Wellman-Lord  concentration  system,  the amount  of  energy  used was a
 minimum.  Also  TSK considered that  there was no feasible way to  elim-
 inate  the sulfate formed when using the  Wellman-Lord  system.
     The development  effort used  approximately six  technical people
 for  an equivalent period of 6 months over a  total elapsed  time of 3
 years.
     The initial  order  for  the  full-scale Onahama magnesium  oxide
 system was  given  to  TSK in  the  fall of 1972.   Startup occurred in
 December  1972, and the shakedown phase was completed by May of  1973.
 Since 1973,well over  2  years  of operating time has  accrued.


 5.4.2  MAGNESIUM OXIDE  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
      Figure  5-10 is a  flowsheet  of the  Onahama magnesium  oxide sys-
 tem.  The gases from the reverberatory furnace are  treated with  the
 same equipment  as that  used in the  gypsum system  using the initial
 washing  tower and the secondary sea water cooled  gas  coolers (Sec-
 tion 5.2).

      The gases pass from the absorber to a mist  eliminator  of the
 same design as  that used for the  gypsum  system (Section 5.2).
 Following the mist eliminator, a fan with a  suction  pressure  of
 400 to 500  mm of water  is located,  followed  by the electro-
 static precipitator and then the  stack.   The offgases generally
 contain 20 ppm of S02 when  they leave the stack.
      The main  absorbent circuit  has three  75  kilowatt pumps and
 circulates  the  absorbent at approximately 1,200 m3/hr.   The
 overflow circuit from the bottom  of the  absorber  takes the slurried
magnesium sulfite through a 55 kilowatt  pump to a liquid cyclone at a
 flow rate of  approximately  200 m3 per hour.  The  cyclone is
 used to rouqh-cut the slurry material  to  40 to 50 percent  solids.

                                  145

-------
                                           cu

                                           00

                                           (ti
                                           c5
                                           (TS
                                           CD
                                           +J
                                            s-
                                            o
                                           4-
                                            OJ
                                            o
                                            I
                                           LO
146

-------
      The overflow from the cyclone goes downstream to the centri-
fuge centrate return system.   The high solid content slurry cy-
clone underflow is then passed  into 12 centrifuges  for
removing most of the remaining attached water.   The centrate passes
out of the centrifuge through a holding tank back to the absorber
circuit.
     The centrifuged material  is passed by  screw conveyor to a
rotary  dryer.  The rotary dryer consists of a series  of two pass  single
tubes through which steam at over  300°C is  passed.  These tubes do not
recirculate the steam  but allow it  to condense and the condensate
then flows back to the inlet end of the dryer and then out to waste.
The gases in the dryer are at approximately 180°C and pass to the
stack through a baghouse, an absorber, and an exhaust fan which
operates at a minus 300 millimeters water suction pressure.  The
dried material passes  from the dryer at 160°C to a screw conveyor
where it is combined with coke through a variable speed rotary
valve to pass into the rotary calciner.
      The rotary calciner is fired with Bunker C oil and produces
800°C gas at the burner  end.   The  calciner  breaks  down  the mag-
nesium  sulfite to S02  and MgO, and passes a 10 percent S02 stream
out to  the acid plant  at a temperature of approximately 400°C.
In addition the magnesium sulfate  is reduced by coke to magnesium
sulfite.  The magnesium oxide in the calciner flows out at 600°C
to the  slaker where it is mixed with the overflow from the centri-
fuge and cyclone systems.  The magnesium oxide is converted to
magnesium hydroxide in the slaker and the slurry is then passed
to the  magnesium hydroxide storage tank.  This tank also receives
new magnesium hydroxide.
      The amount of makeup dry magnesium hydroxide added is 0.08  kg/kg
of input S02«  The makeup slurry at 10 percent solids is pumped
back to the absorber at a rate of approximately 50 m^/hr.
      Component design and cost considerations are briefly discussed
in Appendix 0.

                                 147

-------
5.4.3  OPERATING CONDITIONS
5.4.3.1  Input Material and Preparation
      The magnesium hydroxide is purchased as a liquid containing 20
to 30 percent solids of Mg(OH)2«  Analysis of this material  is:
       • CaO    0.97 percent
       • S04    0.30 percent
       • MgO   17.68 percent
               remainder

       The specific gravity of the absorption slurry is 1.1 to 1.2.
 The turnover ratio of the makeup magnesium hydroxide is approxi-
 mately 20 times.
       The magnesium hydroxide is obtained from seabrine.  There
 are no special purifying requirements, and the material is produced
 in a plant nearby.  There is no major change in the reactivity of
 the magnesium hydroxide during use perhaps because it is replaced
 once every 20 cycles.  The amount of makeup dry magnesium hydroxide
 that is added is 0.08 kilograms per kilogram of input S02.
       A total  of  3.5  metric  tons of steam are  used  in the dryer  per
 metric  ton  of  sulfur  dioxide.
       The amount of coke that is used  is 0.012 kg/kg of sulfur diox-
 ide.  The only function of the coke is to reduce the magnesium sul-
 fate in the calciner.  The sizing of the coke is not critical, how-
 ever, it cannot be too large because it would not all  take part  in
 the reaction and it cannot be too small because of the resulting dust
 problem.
       Bunker C fuel oil is used in the calciner at the rate of 1,833
 Ib/hr or 0.13 Ib/hr S02.
       Pump seal leakage water into the system is approximately 11
 ton/hr.
                                 148

-------
5.4.3.2  Internal Operating Conditions
     Chemical reactions are discussed in Appendix P.
     A separate crystallization step is not required because crys-
tals are formed in the absorber.   Crystal  size and uniformity are not
a problem because only the magnesium sulfite hexahydrate is formed.
There is no evidence of the trihydrate being formed.
     Crystal size, while influencing caking, is not changed or
adjusted.  The crystals that are  picked up in the centrate from the
centrifuge do not affect the process since the centrate is returned
to the absorber.
     The L/G ratio in the absorber is 13 to 14.  The absorbent
and regeneration subsystem pH controls are important, and are con-
sidered proprietary.
     The system appears to have considerable capability for ab-
sorbing fluctuations in the SCL from the reverberatory furnace.
This is inherent because of the capacity of the absorbent, the
supply of the absorbent, and the  fact that the pH is maintained
constant.  Thus, when a peak S02  arrives,  additional magnesium
hydroxide increases the absorbent capability of the system.  Make-
up magnesium hydroxide is 0.08 kg/kg of inlet sulfur dioxide and
includes reheat and other losses.  Below a pH of 6, magnesium
bisulfite begins to form and must be bled  from the system, because
it is not regenerable.
     There are no problems with magnesium  sulfate buildup.  The
turnover ratio and makeup material are sufficient to eliminate this
problem.  Coke is reprocessed from the calciner and recycled.
5.4.3.3  Output
     An average 10 percent sulfur dioxide  gas stream is generated
by the calcine.   This may reach a high value of 13 percent S02.
     The gas leaving the dryer passes through a bag filter,
through a sea water scrubber, and then to  the stack.  Water from
this scrubber is discharged to the ocean.
                                 149

-------
      Some  excess water  is purged to the settling pit and then to
 the  ocean  at  the rate of 10 ton/day.


5.4.3.4  Maintenance and Operation
      Every month the absorption tower is  changed.   A spare tower
is included in this system.   Each tower is cleaned with an acid
wash for 1 day and left as  a spare  for 1 month until  the second
tower is taken out of line.   It is only in the absorption tower
that any indication of plugging occurs.  There are no other clean-
ing problems.
      Ball wear in the TCA absorber is controlled by replacement
every 2 to 3  months.
      Loss of absorbent has been as high as 10 percent of the MgO
feed  and occurs in the acid plant wash towers since the wash water
 is discharged to the ocean.
      The  MgO is slaked adequately without heating but it has been
 necessary  to  do some grinding  of the  larger agglomerates.
 5.4.3.5  Area Required
       The  area required for the  55,000 scfm magnesium  hydroxide
 plant at the Onahama Smelter  is  5,500 m^.

 5.4.4  APPLICATION OF THE MAGNESIUM OXIDE S09 CONTROL SYSTEM
       TO  U.S. SMELTERS                     *
      Considerable work on MgO  systems  has been done by U.S. con-
tractors.  A  pilot system was  installed at the Boston Edison Power
Plant  (Mystic Power Generating Station) and at Potomic Electric.  These
 latter encountered  experimental  difficulties  and are not  now  in
operation, but the experience  obtained was sufficiently promising to
convince Philadelphia Electric to install  a system.  This is currently
 in operation  and several more  are under construction for this company.
Design and construction is by  United  Engineers who are also designing
a system for  the TVA Johnsville Station in Tennessee.

                                150

-------
     While there does not appear to be a single outstanding reason
for the early difficulties encountered, it can generally be said that
development and operating experience in Japan was greater than in
the U.S. at the time the first systems were installed.  This is some-
what confirmed by the fact that the U.S. company, CHEMICO, which took
part in early system development, also installed their third magnesium
oxide installation at the Chiba refinery in Japan and this system is
apparently working satisfactorily.   While it uses the Claus process
for converting the concentrated SCL to sulfur, the first part of this
system is essentially the same with the modified design technology to
improve system operations and operating time.

        One of the major  differences between the U.S. and the Japanese
 systems is that the U.S. used a venturi scrubber while the Japanese
 used  a  TCA scrubber.  However,  in discussing this with the Japanese,
 they  do not feel this is a major difference and in fact have indi-
 cated  that they would be interested  in using a venturi scrubber.  The
 Japanese use two alternate scrubbers  instead of one, and this could
 be  a  major factor  in maintaining on-stream time.
       Other factors such as differences in pH throughout the system
 and minor path variation could make  the difference in achieving a
 successfully operating  system.
        Replacing of the  MgO at relatively frequent intervals could
 aid in  operation of this system.  The  purchase of the MgO in the form
 of  a magnesium hydroxide slurry by the Japanese apparently facilitated
 the handling of this material compared to the mixing problems that
 were  encountered in the U.S.  The fact that recycled MgO slurry
 apparently was more satisfactory from  an $03 removal standpoint than
 was the virgin MgO in the U.S. experience further supports this
 contention.
       Except for the potential problem of water supply, it appears
 that  there is no major  reason why the  MgO system cannot be used as
 an  S02  concentration system for the  reverberatory furnace offgas.
                                151

-------
     The MgO system at the Onahama smelter uses  the  following
material:
          • MgO                        12.5 Ib/min
          • Bunker C fuel  oil           30.6 Ib/min
          • Coke                        3.1 Ib/min
          • Steam                     812    Ib/min
     Calculation if the water  and material balances  for  the  MgO
                                                              3
system at Onahama based on a design inlets gas  flow  of 1,500 Nm /min
are shown in Appendix Q.  A summary of the water balance follows:
     • Water in flue gas                                 445 Ib/min
     • Water in gas at outlet  of washing tower            585 Ib/min
     • Water added to flue gas in washing  tower          140 Ib/niin
     • Water in gas at outlet  of gas coolers             250 Ib/min
     • Total water removed from flue gas in
       combined washing tower  and gas cooler             195 Ib/min
     • Water makeup for gas cooler section               140 Ib/min
     • Water in MgO makeup slurry                         59 Ib/min
     • Water of crystalization in MgS03'6H20             392 Ib/min
     • Water adhered to crystals                         378 Ib/min
     • Water lost in dryer                               478 Ib/min
     • Water in pump seals                               411 Ib/min
     • Water purged in slurry                              16 Ib/min
     • Water into MgO system (445 +140+59+411)     1,055 Ib/min
     • Water out of MgO system (195 + 392 + 478 + 16)   1,081 Ib/min
     With a system designed for minimum water use by recycling from
the water treatment plant the  following projected water  balance  is
                      3
estimated for 1,500 Nm /mm of gas at 2.6 percent S0?.
     • Water in flue gas, Wf                             444 Ib/min
     • Water leaving stack, W                            242 Ib/min
     • Water condensed from flue gas, W-                 202 Ib/min
     • Water to water treatment section from
       washing tower and gas cooler                      202 Ib/min
                                152

-------
       Water lost in gas cooling sections, W           61 Ib/min
       (10% purge, 20% evaporation of feed to
        water treatment)
       Makeup water in MgO slurry, W                   59 Ib/min
       Water of crystalization and surface
       moisture driven off in dryer, W                478 Ib/min
       Slurry purge water, W                           14 Ib/min
 5.5  CITRATE  PROCESSES
 5.5.1   GENERAL

     The two major developers of SO^ concentration systems based on
 cibrate type absorbents are the U.S. Bureau of Mines in Salt Lake City
 and Flakt-Boliden in Sweden.  Each group has conducted pilot plant
 tests using metallurgical plant gases.

      The Bureau of Mines process was developed as a result of
investigations showing that organic acids such as acetic, citric,
 lactic, and similar acids had a great affinity for S02.82  A mixture
of citric acid,  sodium citrate, and sodium thiosulfate was select-
ed for further development because of its chemical stability,
low vapor pressure, and adequate pH buffering capacity.  This
system was designed to produce sulfur by using manufactured h^S
as a reducing agent.  Pilot tests on gases from a copper  smelter
reverberatory furnace encountered experimental difficulties but
indicate the potential at least for the absorption of S02 from
these gases into the citrate solution.

     In recent years, efforts to develop a commercial  desulfurization
 process resulted in a cooperative program between Boliden  Aktiebolag
 and Flakt (Svenska Flaktfabrikan).   The Flakt-Boliden  system resulted
 from long range development work carried out by several  copper smelters
and technical  institutes in Scandinavia.  The work developed from a
successful S02 control system using only low temperature water as

                                153

-------
absorbent, which has been in operation at the Boliden AB Ronnskar-
verken Smelter in Skelleftehamn, Sweden since 1970.  The absorbent
which was developed was a brine of citric acid and sodiim citrate
which improved the flexibility of the system over straight cold
water.  The exact composition of the absorbent depends on a number of
parameters such as S02 concentration in the feed, gas temperature
and required SOg concentration and absorbent temperature.
      Both groups have developed similar systems that have, on a
pilot plant level, indicated the potential  for absorption of the lean
S02 stream from the copper smelter reverberatory furnace to concen-
trate S02 at absorption efficiencies well over 95 percent.  The
Bureau of Mirfes encountered considerable development problems in the
portion of the system downstream of the absorption section in the
H2S producing and sulfur reduction sections.  Flakt-Boliden con-
siders their systan simply a concentration technique that generates
concentrated S02 that can then be used to produce liquid S02,
H2S04, or S depending upon the specific application.  The success
of both groups with the absorption system indicates that, for rever-
beratory furnace applications, the citrate system can be used to up-
grade the S02 concentration to allow additional  processing to
either liquid S02> sulfuric acid, or sulfur through a coal reduc-
tion  system.  The use of the ^S reduction approach has not been
satisfactorily demonstrated as an integrated system.

5.5.2  BUREAU OF MINES CITRATE PROCESS
5.5.2.1  Introduction and History
      The Bureau of Mines Salt Lake City Metallurgy Research Center
started research on flue gas desulfurization with particular emphasis
on control of S02 emissions from the nonferrous  smelting industry.
Absorption  in an  aqueous solution of citric acid and  sodium  citrate
was  selected due to good chemical stability,  low vapor pressure, and
adequate  pH buffering capacity.  The purity and  physical character of
the  resulting precipitated  sulfur was  also considered  advantageous.
                                 154

-------
     After successful laboratory results, the Bureau of Mines in
1970, constructed and operated a pilot plant to remove SCL from
flue gas from a copper reverberatory furnace.  It was a joint venture
between the Bureau of Mines and Magma Copper Company.  This plant,
located at San Manuel Smelter in Arizona, treated 300 scfm of gas
containing 1.0 to 1.5 percent SO? and consistently removed 93 to 99
               83
percent of SO^.    Failures of the gas cleaning system, pump
breakdowns, and plugging of flow lines with precipitates and melted
sulfur, occurred during the testing.  Most of the problems
occurred in the S0?  to sulfur conversion circuit.  Useful
data on consumption of citric acid and other reagents were not ob-
tained, but the S0£ absorption and regeneration system proved man-
ageable for removal of 93 to 99 percent of the S02 from the smelter
gas.
     Two other pilot plant investigations were undertaken  to  obtain
data for engineering evaluation and  cost estimates.   One  pilot
plant was independently built and operated by Arthur  G. McKee and
Company, Peabody Engineering Systems, and Pfizer, Inc., at Terre
Haute, Indiana in  1972.  This pilot  plant treated stack gases from
a coal-fired  steam-generating station.  After several  modifications
to  arrive at  a final equipment configuration, the pilot plant
operated from March  15 to September  1, 1974, logging  2,300 opera-
ting hours.   The longest sustained run was 180 hours.  The pilot
plant treated 2,000  scfm flue gas containing 0.1 to  0.2 percent
SOo and consistently removed 95 to 97 percent of SO^.   Equip-
ment difficulties were also encountered,  thus preventing complete
steady-state operation of the entire system.
      The other pilot plant was constructed by the Bureau of
Mines and operated jointly by the Bureau  of Mines and the Bunker
Hill Company at the lead smelter in Kellogg,  Idaho.   Nominal
capacity of the Kellogg pilot plant was 1,000 scfm of 0.5 percent S0? gas,
taken as  a slipstream from a Lurgi updraft lead sintering machine
yielding about 1/3 ton of sulfur per day.8^  Here, again, dif-
ficulties with the S02 reduction system, as well as problems with
                               155

-------
 maintaining  a  steady-state feed stream,prevented conclusive system
 tests.
 5.5.2.2  Process Description
      The generalized flow diagram for the Bureau of Mines citrate
 process is given in Figure 5-11.   Process chemistry is discussed in
 AppendixR.  Incoming gases are cleaned of particulate matter and
 acid mist and cooled to 115°  to 150°F.   This is  done in a  combination
 of a baghouse, packed scrubber, and electrostatic mist precipitator,
 or a venturi scrubber.
      The cooled and cleaned gas is then led to  an absorber.   The
 absorber  is a countercurrent packed scrubber with a liquid to gas
 flow of nearly 10 gal/1,000 ft3.  The liquid is  an aqueous
 solution  of  sodium  citrate and citric  acid.  The cleaned  gas
 from the  absorber is  exhausted to  the  atmosphere through  a stack.
      The S0?  rich  citrate solution  from the bottom of the absorber
 is fed  by a  level control to a continuous  stirred  tank reactor
 system  countercurrent to a flow of FLS gas.  In  the reactor,  the
 SOp is  reduced to sulfur, and the citrate solution  is regenerated.
 Sulfur  slurry  from  the  reactor is  fed  to the sulfur separation
 system.   In  the sulfur  separation  unit,  sulfur  is  removed by  oil
flotation.  The floated sulfur  at  35  to 45 percent  solid is fed  through
a heater to raise  the temperature  above 125°C to  melt the  sulfur.
Liquid phases are separated in a decanter under a pressure of 35 psi,
the bottom layer is drawn off as high-quality molten yellow sulfur,
and the citrate solution top layer, at reduced pressure,  is dis-
charged to a flash drum.
      Citrate solution from the decanter can be  bypassed  around
or into a vacuum crystallizer where sodium sulfate  is  removed
from the solution by  cooling to a  temperature well  above  the  freez-
 ing point of water.
      The H«S gas for the regenerator  is made from  the recovered
 sulfur  in the H2$ reactor.  Filtered liquid sulfur  is  preheated

                                156

-------
z
o
cc
UJ
Z
u
o
 CM
I
ceo:
 -
-JO
DO
COg
I
wee

s
  .
z
o

o.
cc
o
w
m
 CM
O
CO
z
z
                         O)
                         o
                         o

                         Q.

                         O)
                         -M
                         (O
                         s-
                         -4-J
                                                                                           QJ
                                                                                           to
                                                                                           
                                                                                            ft!
                          S-
                          3
                          CT>
           -5-2
              ~
	». s  X
                                                                 O
                                                                  N
                                                                 X
                                             157

-------
by the H2$ reactor effluent to 785°F.  It is then vaporized in a
heater at 1.050 °F and superheater to 1,200°F.  Part of the steam and
the natural  gas required for h^S generation are preheated to
1,050°F and mixed with a portion of the sulfur vapor.   The mixed gas
at 1,168°F enters the top of a quench-cooled catalytic ^S reactor.
The remaining sulfur vapor is blended with unpreheated steam-natural
gas mixture and is injected into the catalytic bed to  maintain near
isothermal bed temperature.  The reaction is exothermic and the ef-
fluent from the reactor leaves at 1,292°F.
      The hot gas from  the  H2S  reactor preheats  the sulfur feed
to the reactor, and it is  then used  to generate steam  required
for HpS generation.  The  gas  is  cooled to 140°F  and is then fed
to the citrate absorbent  regenerator.

5.5.2.3  Problems With the Process
      The Bureau of  Mines  citrate process  has  a  high  absorption
efficiency and can be used  within a  wide  range of S02  concentrations.
It produces  elemental sulfur which  is very  desirable  from  thre
marketing point of view.   But there  are a  few  problems associated
with the process that appeared during the  several demonstration
test programs.  These problems are enumerated  herein:
     1.  The process is relatively complex  and therefore
         the reliability  of the  process is  not yet  very  good.
     2.  The process uses  natural gas for  producing H2S.
         With the future  supplies of natural gas  in
         doubt, its  usage  is not very desirable.
     3.   Nearly 2 to 3  percent  of  incoming  S02 is oxidized.
     4.   Kerosene consumption is nearly 85  Ib  per net  long  ton of
          sulfur produced,  even though the  Bureau of Mines  reports
         that  it may be possible to  recover 75 percent of  this amount.86
     5.  Additional  development  effort is  required  for the H?S
         generating  system and  the  sulfur handling  system.
                                  158

-------
     The Bureau of Mines is, however, looking into steam stripping
of the pregnant absorbent solution as an alternative to sulfur pre-
cipitation by HpS to produce strong S02 gas for feed to a sulfuric
acid plant.  This alternative would simplify the process signifi-
cantly and would probably eliminate most of the aforementioned
problems.

5.5.3  FLAKT-BOLIDEN CITRATE PROCESS
5.5.3.1  Introduction and History
     Boliden AB Ronnskarsverken Smelter at Skelleftehamn, Sweden has
been removing sulfur dioxide from smelter gases by absorption in cold
water at full scale since 1970 (see Figure 5-12).  The flue gases treate<
are a blend of gases from multiple hearth furnaces, two electric furnace:
converters, and a lead smelter.  The volume flow of gases is in the
                           o
range of 60,000 to 70,000 m /hr at 300°F, containing S02 concentra-
tions from 0.5 percent with a 3 percent average.  The absorbed sul-
fur dioxide is stripped by heating with steam.  The plant produces
6 ton/hr of  liquid S02.87
      During December 1976, a new plant (Figure 5-13) for liquid
production was put into operation at the aforementioned smelter.  The
maximum production rate of liquid S0£ is 16 ton/hr, of which most
will be sold to the Swedish pulp industry.88  However, to give
flexibility, the liquid S02 can also be evaporated and fed to one
of the existing sulfuric acid plants in order to keep the S02 con-
tent of the feed gas to the acid plant approximately constant.
     Absorption of S02 in cold water at this smelter is possible
by the ample supply of cold water (5°C to 8°C) during the entire
     89
year.    In situations where cold water is not available year-
round, it is desirable to improve the S02 absorption properties of
water.  This process is a result of long range development work  car-
ried out by the Boliden Company of Sweden, the Norwegian Technical
Institute SINTEF, and FLAKT (Svenska Flaktfabriken).   It was found
                                 159

-------
                                                       O)
                                                     » E
                                                    CC (O  I
                                                   :
                                                    C7)UJ  OO U
                                                    •>- 3 -a 3
                                                    U. CO  (O T3
                                                     o:
                                                            CO
                                                     CO i—
                                                     •z.  o  c
                                                     ^ C_)  O
                                                    :o    -^
                                                     O<    ^_3
                                                          •  o
                                                     UJ O  3
                                                     n: r-. -o
                                                     I— O*>  O

                                                     t~r~  o.
                                                     <£ LU
                                                        C_5 -O
                                                        co
o Q;
CO UJ
   o_
LU O
                                                            a>
                                                           J3
                                                            S-   •
                                                            O  CM
                                                            (/) O
                                                           .a co
                                                            (O
                                                              T3
                                                            00 T-
   ^ 03 3
   LU    CT
   Q *O '»~
       Cl) r-


       3 M-
                                                    CM 3
                                                    r- CO
                                                     O)  LU
                                                     S-  I—
                                                     3  _1
                                                     OlLU
                                                    •r-  ^
                                                    U.  CO
       S- C
       a> o
       4-> -M
       ro
       2 ^O
160

-------
 that by adding weak bases which have good buffering properties to
 water, the S02 absorption capacity is increased.
       The base chosen for this purpose was a combination of citric
 acid and sodium hydroxide.  Citric acid has a very low vapor pressure
 and shows great chemical stability.  In recent years, development
 work on a commercial desulfurization system, based on citrate as
 absorbent, has been conducted as a cooperative venture between Boliden
 Aktiebolog and FLAKT.
       The Flakt-Boliden  citrate process  is  based  on an  absorption
 stripping technique  in which the  absorbent is a  brine of citric
 acid and  sodium  citrate.   The  pregnant absorbent  goes to  a
 stripper  where a mixture  of  sulfur dioxide  and water vapor  is
 driven off.   After  condensing  the  main quantity of water, the
 sulfur dioxide may  be put to use in different ways depending on  the
 local  market  requirements.   A  gas  mixture,  containing some  water
 vapor,  can for instance  be used directly in a Claus plant for
 production of elemental  sulfur  or  in a contact plant for  produc-
 tion of sulfuric acid.  The  citrate  process may be  used for gases
 with varying  concentration of S02,  such as tail  gases from metallur-
 gical and chemical processes as well as from power  plant flue gases.
 Since  the absorbent  is a  solution  rather than a slurry, scaling
 and  plugging  of  equipment  is minimized.
5.5.3.2  Process Description
     The schematic of the Flakt-Boliden citrate process is given
in Figure 5-14.  Process chemistry is described in Appendix S.   The
incoming gas (prior to going to the absorption tower) is cleaned in a
high-efficiency particulate collector, preferably an electrostatic
precipitator, and then cooled to saturation by direct water injection.
In addition to dust, sulfuric acid mist is removed in a mist precipi-
tator before the absorption step to minimize sodium sulfate formation
in the absorber which would increase the purge requirements.  The
important process variables at the absorption step are:
                                  161

-------
LTERNATIVE
PLANTS
x
! i
c
•^
r 5
L
T


                                 3
                                 CD
162

-------
     1.  Liquid-to-gas flow ratio in the absorber
     2.  Sulfur dioxide content of the incoming gas
     3.  Composition of the solution
     4.  Temperature of operation
     The gas temperature at the inlet to the absorber is in the
range of 115° to 150°F.9^  The cooled and saturated gas containing
S02 is fed into the bottom of an absorption tower, where it meets
the absorbent in counterflow.  The composition of the absorbent de-
pends on a number of parameters such as incoming S02 concentration,
gas temperature, and required absorption efficiency.  The absorption
of S02 takes place under atmospheric pressure and close to equilib-
rium between the SOp concentration in the gas and that in the solu-
tion.  The absorption of SCL takes place at isothermal conditions.
The absorption efficiency is in the range of 95 to 99 percent.
The cleaned gas after passing through a demister is passed to the
atmosphere through a stack.
     The S02 laden solution  is pumped from the bottom of the absorp-
tion tower to the top of the stripping  tower.  The stripping  is ac-
complished by steam treatment  in countercontact to the liquid flow.
As the vapor pressure of water increases more rapidly than that of
S02, it is favorable to strip  at reduced pressure  (down to approxi-
mately one-tenth atmosphere).  At the bottom of the stripping tower,
low  pressure steam is introduced and  the tower is kept under vacuum
producing a mixture of S02 and water vapor.  From the bottom of the
stripping tower, the absorbent, now with just a small fraction of
S02, is recirculated to the  absorber.   The fact that the stripping
takes place under vacuum affects steam  consumption favorably and
low-pressure steam or even  hot water  can be used.
     The steam consumption in  the stripper is directly related to the
S02  concentration in the flue  gas.  The higher the S02 concentration,
the  lower the specific steam consumption.  For example, with 3 per-
cent SCL in the flue gas, the  steam consumption is roughly 2 ton/
ton  of S02 stripped.  For 2  percent SCL in the flue gas, the steam

                                 163

-------
 consumption  increases  to 3 ton/ton of SCL stripped.  And for  1 percent
 SCL  in  the flue  gas, the steam consumption  is further  increased to
                          91
 6 ton/ton of SCL stripped.
      The steam consumption in the stripper  is also related to the
                        92
 stripping temperature.     The steam consumption  increases with an
 increase in  the  stripping temperature,  especially when the flue gases
 with low SCL concentration are being treated.   So it is highly desirable
 to operate the stripper at the lowest possible  temperature.   It should,
 however, be  pointed  out that the low pressure steam required  can be
 available as a waste product from smelter operations.
      The mixture of  SCL and water from  the  stripping column  is cooled
 in a condenser where most of the water  is separated.   The condensate,
 containing only  a small quantity of SCL, is returned to the  stripping
 column.
      The concentrated  SCL gas which can be  as high as  95  percent with  a
 water saturation temperature of  30°C can be conveyed directly to a
 Claus plant  for  the  production of elemental sulfur, a  contact plant  for
 sulfuric acid production, or condensed  by refrigeration to liquid SCL.
      In the  case of liquid  SCL  production,  the  water  remaining  in
the gas is  removed by contact with  concentrated  sulfuric  acid in
a small  packed tower.  After drying,  the S02 gas still  contains  a
small amount  of inert gas.   The  dried  SCL gas is conveyed  to  a
Freon cooler  where it is condensed  into  liquid-SCL.   The  liquid
is pumped into a  storage tank  kept  under pressure. The tail  gas
is returned  to the absorber.
     The main impurity  accumulated  in  the closed absorption  loop  is
sodium sulfate.   Different concentrations of SCL in the in-going gas
are encountered as well as some  oxidation of SCL in the absorption
tower.  One advantage of the citrate absorbent  is that  the oxidation
of sulfite  to sulfate is inhibited  by  the citrate, mainly  due to the
complex-binding character of the  citrate ion which prevents heavy metal
ions from acting  as oxidation catalyst.   Flakt  has also developed
information on the effects of trace metals which would  promote oxidation.

                                 164

-------
     Even if the amount of sulfate formed in the sodium citrate
solution is small, it must be removed when the sulfate content has
reached a certain level.  This can be attained by an intermittent
or or continuous bleed-off from the stripper of approximately 1
percent of the stripped solution, for regeneration in a special
regenerating step.  During regeneration, the sodium citrate and
sodium sulfate are separated from the solution.  This is done by
using seed crystals and a cooling unit to recover sodium citrate
and remove sodium sulfate.  Details of this regeneration system are
                                       93
presented in U.S. Patent No. 3,886,069.     The solution is returned
to the absorbent.  The sodium sulfate is a waste product.
     A pilot plant, Figure 5-15, was used to conduct tests with
the citrate absorbent.  The main purpose of the tests was  to estab-
lish a design background to the absorption/stripping process and
to investigate the influences of different components in the raw
gas on the oxidation of S02 in the absorbent.
     The pilot plant absorber and stripper are conventionally packed
towers with highly efficient packing, providing good mass  transfer
characteristics and countercurrent flow of gas and liquid.  The
pilot plant is connected to the inlet of one of the sulfuric acid
plants at Ronnskar and receives part of this feed gas which was
cooled and cleaned of particulate matter.
     The raw gas originates from different metallurgical operations
in the copper and lead smelters.  As these processes are not
                                             95
continuous, the S02 concentration fluctuates.     The SCk concen-
tration varies between 0.2 and 6.0 percent by volume, but  is mostly
constant at one level for sufficient time to make several  measure-
ments possible of steady-state conditions.  Thus, the pilot plant
test results give information about the influence of different
parameters on a wide range of SOo concentrations.  Inlet and
outlet S0? concentrations are both continuously measured with IR
instruments.
                               165

-------
Figure 5-15.   Flakt-Boliden  Pilot  Plant  at
              Ronnskar Smelter,  Sweden.
                    166

-------
      The liquid-to-gas ratio in the absorber can be varied approxi-
mately between 1 and 4-£/m3.  And the stripping can be performed
under varying pressures, from approximately 0.1 atmosphere absolute
pressure to atmospheric pressure.96
     Flakt reports that the test results look very promising.  The
oxidation rates were found to be very low with an average value of
about 0.1 percent of absorbed SOp-  This oxidation rate is at least
an order of magnitude lower than found in the concentrated sodium
sulfite/hydrogen sulfite process.  Consequently, the demand for make
up of chemicals should be very low in the Flakt-Boliden process.
     The specific steam consumption in the stripper increased, with
a decrease of S02 concentration in the feed gas.  However, according
to Flakt, a new process development indicates significant decrease in
the steam consumption, especially at low S02 concentrations in the
feed gas.97  No details of this new process were available at the
time of writing this report.

5.5.3.3  Example of Green and Calcine Charge Reverberatory Furnace
         S02 Control Systems'
      A typical Flakt-Boliden S02 recovery process for green and
calcine charge is shown in Figures 5-16 and 5-17.   These-flow sheets
include material balance for a 100,000 scfm system with 0.8 percent
S02 for the calcine charge and 1.5 percent S02 for the green
charge examples.9**
     The process shown assumes that the regenerated S02 will be
liquified as the product.  If the gases are to be used to produce
sulfuric acid,the H^SO. dryer and the S02 liquefaction system
would be eliminated and replaced by the acid plant system.
      The S02 gas generated by the concentration system is 1,220
Nm3/hr for the calcine charge and 2,300 Nm3/hr for the green
charge with a water saturation temperature of 30°C.   The system was
designed for removing 90 percent of the S02 in the gases.  Summary
data are shown in Table 5-1.
                                 167

-------
UJ
z
                                                           0)
                                                           O

                                                           -p

                                                           o
                                                           o

                                                            CM
                                                           O
                                                           a>
                                                           to
                                                           ns
                                                           O)
                                                            O)
                                                            o
                                                            O
                                                           -l->
                                                            CO

                                                            
-------
s
5
Z
UJ
Ul
tr
                                                                                                              OJ
                                                                                                             -M
                                                                                                              00
                                                                                                              o

                                                                                                             4J

                                                                                                              O
                                                                                                             o

                                                                                                               CM
                                                                                                             O
                                                                                                             t/0

                                                                                                              O)
                                                                                                              (O
                                                                                                              cn
                                                                                                              0)
                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                              
-------
         Table  5-1.   FLAKT-BOLIDEN PROCESS  - TECHNICAL  DATA  SUMMARY
FltJkt-Boliden Process - Technicol doto (opprox.)
Calcine charge Green charge
Gas conditions
Gas volume SCFM
Gas temperature °F
$©2 concentration % by vol
so3«-
Water content in r gas %
Oxygen content in gas %
FlBkt-Boliden Process
Required SO- removal efficiency
Consumption of low grade steam
or
Hot water (if no steam available)
Cooling water of 20°C in 40°C out
for water condenser
Make-up water
Citric Acid (100%)
NaOH (100%)
Electrical power (incl. fan)






%
kg/h

m3/h
n>3/h
m3/h
kg/h
kg/h
kW
100,000
400
0.8
O.tfcof
6 - 8
8
90
31,000

500
867
15.4
0.5
13
325
100,000
400
1.5
S02 cone. O."feof SO, cone
10 - 15
8
90
36,000

670
1,010
19.0
0.8
24
325
If_on_SO_ ligycfaction_sy_stem_is installed the_fallowing  additional
Production of liquid S02
Additional consumptions of
Cooling water
H$0  for dryer (98%)
                                     kg/h    3580
                                   m3/h
                                   m3/h
243
  0.51
6720

 439
   0.78
        After  the dryer H_SO, (70%) is returned to a sulfuric acid plant for reconcentration
                   or neutralized.
                   If NaOH  is not available for the sodium citrate  solution
                   NaCO.  can be used as well
                                          170

-------
5.5.4  APPLICATION OF CITRATE PROCESS TO COPPER SMELTER REVERBERATORY
       FURNACE S02 CONTROL
     If the citrate system is viewed simply as an extension of
the cold water absorption system, its relative simplicity and relia-
bility are evident.  As an absorption system it can be viewed as
concentrating the sulfur dioxide from the reverberatory furnace to
a point where it can then be used as feed to any other subsequent
system that may produce either liquid S02» sulfuric acid or sulfur.
The subsequent systems of course must have been developed satis-
factorily.
     With steam stripping, the supply of steam at a smelter should
not be a critical iten since stripping is conducted under vacuum con-
ditions allowing the use of low quality steam or even hot water.
However, the system requires additional water to be supplied which
could be a problem in some areas.
      Operating experience on metallurgical gases, both at full-scale
and particularly at the pilot plant scale, indicate the feasibility
of the material as an absorbent.  The operation of the full-scale
plant processing reverberatory furnace gases must still be demonstra-
ted for long periods of time.  The record,however, does not indicate
that any of the experimental difficulties encountered in all the test
work represents fundamental problems that would eliminate this system
from consideration.

P.6  COMINCO AMMONIA SCRUBBING SYSTEM
5.6.1  GENERAL
      Sulfur dioxide removal from gas streams by ammonia-based
scrubbing has been studied intermittently by various groups since the
                                                        qq
1880's when a British patent was first issued to Ramsey.
Ammonia-based processes are not amenable to throw-away operation
because of the cost of ammonia and the solubility and nitrogen value
(with chemical oxygen demand) of ammonium salts.  Perhaps the best
                                 171

-------
known ammonia scrubbing process is the one developed by the Consoli-
dated Mining and Smelting Company and its operations at Trail, B.C.
      The Cominco process can achieve high efficiencies of SCL
removal over a wide range of S02 concentrations well within that
encountered by copper reverberatory furnaces.  Since the absorbent
is a solution rather than a slurry, there are no scaling or plug-
ging problems in the process.  The system produces a concentrated S02
stream which can be used to produce sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur,
or liquid S02-  The main problem with this process is the loss of
ammonia from the system.  The ammonia volatility may limit the mini-
mum level of S02 emission to 200 to 300 ppm for practical  opera-
tions and also introduces costs that could produce an economic
problem.
     The Cominco Smelter is located near the U.S.-Canadian border.
The first acid plant to control S02 was built for zinc roaster gas
in 1916.  Since the various systems have been added to adequately
control the S02, the present S02 control at the smelter is 96.6
percent.
     Preliminary studies on the recovery of 100 percent SO? from
roaster gas and reduction of this to elemental  sulfur were started in
1932.  A number of absorbents were investigated to concentrate the
S02 from the roaster gas, and ammonia-based scrubbing was finally
selected as the most feasible and economical.  A 3 ton/day sulfur
pilot plant was put into operation in 1934.  The experimental  work
was conducted on lead sintering plant gas.
     A semicommercial ammonia base absorption plant operating on zinc
roaster gas and a 40 ton/day reduction unit went into production in
1936.  A larger absorption plant operating on zinc roaster gas of 5.5
percent S02 with tail gas less than 0.2 percent S02> a plant to
treat the lead sintering machine gas of 0.75 percent S02 with tail
gas of 0.10 percent S02> and two additional reduction units were
added, bringing the total rated capacity to 150 ton/day of sulfur.
                                 172

-------
     In 1943, greatly increased supplies of fertilizer were consi-
dered essential to the war effort, and a number of changes were  made
to meet the fertilizer requirements.  The S02  reduction  plants were
closed down in 1943, and the 100 percent S02 was used to enrich  the
gas to the contact acid plants and increase their output.  Presently,
Cominco converts part of the S02 into sulfuric acid and  part into
ammonium sul fate.

5.6.2  PROCESS DESCRIPTION
      The schematic of the ammonia scrubbing process for controlling
S02 from lead sintering plant gas at Trail, B.C. is given in
Figure 5-18.  Process chemistry is summarized  in Appendix T.
A total  of 300,000 scfm of flue gas from the lead  sintering  plant
containing 0.75 percent S02 passes through a humidifying tower and
a dust collector before entering the  absorption plant.   Then,  the
sulfur dioxide content is absorbed in aqueous  ammonia, forming a
solution that is essentially ammonium bisulfite.
      The gas is treated in two parallel systems, each comprising
a lead cooling tower, wood-supported and wood-packed, and three
lead absorption towers, also wood-supported and wood-packed.  Flow
of water in the cooling tower, up to 1,600 gal/min, is countercurrent
to the gas flow.  The three absorption towers  are constructed as a
unit having two partitions with the required openings for gas divid-
ing the structure into three towers.   The flow of gas is concurrent
with the solution in the first tower, countercurrent in the second
tower, and concurrent in the third tower.
     The circulating solution is pumped from the base of each absorp-
tion tower to a distributing spider at the top (flow being 1,200 to
1,500 gal/min in the first two towers and 600  to 800 gal/min in  the
third).  Aqueous ammonia containing about 30 percent nitrogen is added
to the circulation.  Circulating solution temperature is controlled
by passing it through water coolers (aluminum  tubes and  steel  shell)
immediately after the addition of ammonia, removing the  heat of  reac-
tion.  Temperature of the circulating solution is controlled at  about

                                  173

-------
CM
§
0




£
ll


3

£1
•o (—
If
M
3e
lo-
§*
1»
*— O


'
S~
                                    o
                                    o
                                    S-
                                   o.

                                    CD
                                    U
                                    oo

                                    re

                                    c
                                    o
                                    o
                                    o
                                    c
                                    •r-

                                    o
                                    o


                                    
-------
35°C in the first tower and about 2°C lower in each of the succeeding
towers.  Water from the tube coolers is used in the cooling towers
before wasting to the sewer.
     Solution is bled  forward  from  one  tower base  to  the  next.   The
circulating solution is bled off the first  tower to storage  provided
by two 60,000 gal  lead lined wood stave tanks.  The bled  absorption
solution from the  zinc roaster  ammonia  absorption  plant is also  stor-
ed in these two tanks.
     Mixed ammonium  bisulfite  solutions from the lead sintering  and
zinc roaster absorption plants, stored  in the two  bisulfite  storage
tanks, are filtered  through Shriver  presses using  vinyon  cloth and
filter aid, and the  filtrate is stored  in a 200,000-gallon lead  lined
wood stave tank.   The  filter cake is returned to the  smelter.  The
filtrate goes to a heat exchanger which is  heated  by  hot  ammonium
sulfate solution.  It  is then  further  heated with  steam in a  stain-
less steel tubular heater, and mixed with sulfuric acid in a  Pachuca-
type acidifier.  Two acidifiers are  installed, one operating, one
standby.  The evolved  sulfur dioxide gas and solution overflow into
the eliminator, where  the  remainder  of  the  gas is  boiled  out  of  the
ammonium sulfate solution  with direct  steam.  Two  eliminators are
installed, one operating in series  with each acidifier.   These are
constructed of steel,  lined with Pyroflex and acidproof bricks,  and
packed with spiral rings.
     From the eliminator,  the  ammonium  sulfate solution,  substantial-
ly free of sulfur  dioxide, flows by  gravity to a 200,000-gal  ammonium
sulfate storage tank.  This tank is  all wood stave contruction and
lead lined.  Coils are installed in  the pump tanks, to preheat the
bisulfite feed to  the  acidifier and  in  the  heat exchanger.  Aqueous
ammonia is added to  the ammonium sulfate in the pump  tank to  neutral-
ize the free acid  and  produce  a slightly ammoniacal solution  to  mini-
mize corrosion of  equipment.   The ammonium  sulfate solution  from the
storage tank (containing about  42 percent ammonium sulfate)  is pumped
to the fertilizer  plant.
                                 175

-------
      The gas from the eliminator containing sulfur dioxide and
water vapor presently go to an acid plant after passing through
a mist eliminator.  These gases could also go to an S02 reduction
system using coal to produce elemental sulfur.

 5.6.3  THE  APPLICATION  OF  THE COMINCO AMMONIA PROCESS  TO
        CONTROL  COPPER REVERBERATORY  FURNACE OFFGAS
       The most  significant operating  parameters  in the absorption
 step have been  shown to be:

       1.  Solution temperature
       2.  Total  concentration  of  S0£  and NH3  in  solution
       3.  Concentration of individual  ammonium salts (sulfite,
          bisulfite,  and sulfate) which also  determines pH
       4.  Ratio of liquid  to  gas  flow
       5.  Type  of internal  column construction

       Griffin 101 showed that  the equilbrium absorption of  S0?
 is  enhanced  by
       1.   Decreasing the solution temperature
       2.   Minimizing the total  S02  concentration in the  solution

       Ammonia losses are reduced by

        1.  Decreasing the solution temperature
        2.  Minimizing the total NH3 concentration  in solution

       At Cominco, plant control  is based on analysis  of the inlet
 and  tail gas and circulating solution from each absorption tower.
 Solutions are analyzed for pH.   Aqueous ammonia is added to the
 solution to control the pH.  At  low  pH, there is  no SOp absorption
 and  very high  pH results in very high NH3 losses.  So the solution pH
 has  to be maintained within a narrow range to give good S02
 absorption and reasonably low NH3 losses.  This is achieved at
 Cominco by adding aqueous ammonia to each absorption tower and con-
 trolling the solution  temperature to each absorption  tower.
                                176

-------
      A serious  problem that has been  encountered with most  of  the
ammonia scrubbing systems is the formation of an opaque  fume  in the
exit gas stream.  The fume  is  partly attributed to  gas-phase  reac-
tions of ammonia, S02> and  water forming  ammonium sulfite, which,
due to its small size, is not  efficiently removed by a conventional
                 102
mist eliminator.     Wet electrostatic  precipitators have been
used at some installations  to  eliminate this problem.  Cominco  reported
adequate control of the fume when operating with low liquid  tempera-
ture to reduce the ammonia  and S02 losses, and pretreating the  gas
before the absorbers.  Pretreatment of the gas to decrease the  par-
ticulate loading reduces the condensation nuclei on which ammonium
sulfate could form.  Cominco has conducted pilot tests and is cur-
rently preparing to install (by 1981)  new equipment in their  ammonia
SC>2 control system to minmize  or eliminate the stack opacity  prob-
lem.  The approach includes establishing critical pH and temperature
ranges within the primary scrubber.  Basic work on  this  technique
has been done by Catalytic, Inc. (Philadelphia, Pa), which hold
patents with emphasis on application to utilities.
      If natural gas is the source of  the synthesis gas  used  to pro-
duce ammonia, then the same energy-related question arises with this
process as is present with  the reduction to sulfur  processes.   (Refer
to Section 5.8).  The ammonia  synthesis gas should be produced  from
coal (not now generally done in the U.S.) for compatibility  with cur-
rent energy planning and future cost effectiveness.

5.7  WELLMAN-LORD PROCESS
5:7.1   GENERAL
     The Well man-Lord SOp recovery process was developed by  Davy Powergas
in the late 1960s.   Thirty  commercial  installations throughout  the world
are presently either in operation or in design or construction.  Half  of
these are in Japan.   The Wellman-Lord  process has been successfully ap-
plied to SOp absorption from sulfuric acid plants, Claus unit tail gases,
as well  as oil  and coal-fired boilers.  However, it has  never been applied
to the metallurgical  industry.   All the installations currently operating
                                177

-------
in the U.S. have an S02 removal efficiency of greater than 90
percent, and an on-stream time of greater than 97 percent for the
absorption step.  The Japanese installations have an S02 removal
efficiency of greater than 95 percent with an on-stream time of
greater than 98 percent.

      The process provides a method by which the S(L from a weak
stream can be absorbed by chemical reaction with an alkaline
scrubbing liquor.   The S02 is later desorbed by a heating process
in which the S02 appears in a concentrated form and the absorbing
solution is regenerated for recycling to the scrubber.   The strong
SCL gas resulting  from the above absorption and desorption can be
further processed  to sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, or liquid SCL.
      Even though this process has considerable full-scale experience
at power plants and refineries, its use for processing reverberatory
furnace offgas has not been demonstrated and would require additional
confirmatory testing.

5.7.2  PROCESS DESCRIPTION
      Figure 5-19 gives the schematic of the Wellman-Lord process.
Chemistry in the process is discussed in Appendix U.   The flue gas
is first led to a gas pretreatment unit where it is cooled down, and
the particulate matter is removed.  It then enters the SOo absorber,
which is a simple gas-liquid contacting device with two or more
absorption stages.  The absorber can be designed to reduce S02 con-
centration to the required level and can accommodate a wide range
of turndown conditions.  The absorption step is free of scaling
problems.
      Apart from  the  conversion of sodium  sulfite  to sodium  bisul-
fite, the  adsorber also produces  some nonregenerable and therefore
undesirable oxidation products.   Contact  of the  scrubbing  solution
with  oxygen in  the flue gas  will  yield  Na^O^  according  to
           Na2S03  +  1/2  02	^Na2S04

                               178

-------
                                               O
                                               O

                                               Q.
                                               S-
                                               o
                                               OJ
                                               t.
                                               O
                                               to

                                               O)
                                               (C
                                               O
                                               en
                                               LT>
                                               O)
                                               en
                   ll. C9
179

-------
 The presence of S03 in flue gases would also produce Na?SO.
           2 Na2S03 + S03 + H20	^Na2S04 + 2 NaHS03

      Since Na?SOd represents a loss of Na + ion, it has to be
                                +
purged from the system.  The Na   ion is replaced by the injection
of NaOH or Na^CO., into the scrubbing circuit.  In order to minimize
the makeup requirements, the oxidation needs to be suppressed in
the absorber.
      The liquid/gas (L/G) ratio is kept low in the absorber.  The
high concentration of salts and low water load has the effects of
lowering oxygen absorption,  reducing  heat demand  on  the evaporator/
crystallizer,  and reducing  the size of vessels, pumps  and  piping.
Because of this low throughput,  the absorbent fluid  is  recirculated
at each stage  of the tower  to  assure  wetting of the  tray or pack-
ing.   Since absorption  of oxygen is liquid-film controlling, the
low L/G ratio  minimizes oxidation.
      NaHS03 is more soluble than  NapSCL.   By feeding  a strongly
concentrated solution of Na2$03  to the absorber,  scaling and salt
precipitation  are not experienced  since reaction  with  SOp  produces
the soluble NaHSO-j.
      Sodium bisulfite  solution  from  the absorber goes  to  a surge
tank from where it is fed at a steady rate into a forced-circulation
evaporator-crystallizer, which is  heated by low pressure exhaust
steam.  Here the S02 is released from the bisulfite which is regenerated
to the sulfite.  A mixture  of  S02  and steam escapes  through the top.
This gas is cooled to 120 F to condense out the water.   The condensed
water is saturated with sulfur dioxide and is steam stripped to
remove the S02-  The S02 leaving the  stripper combines  with SCL
from the evaporator and is  lead  to either a sulfuric acid  plant,
elemental  sulfur plant,or liquid SCL  plant for further processing.
The sodium sulfite slurry produced in the evaporator is redissolved
in a dissolving tank with recycled condensate from the condenser
                                 180

-------
 system.   The  resulting  lean  solution  flows  to  another  surge  tank
 and is recycled  to  the  absorber.

      Fluctuations in the absorber and regeneration sections  are
stabilized by routing the solutions from each section through surge
tanks.  In addition, the regeneration section can be remotely located
from the absorber section.  The regeneration section can shutdown
completely for scheduled maintenance without interrupting SCL removal
in the absorber section.

       To  control  the  level of  inactive  sodium  sulfate  in  the
 solution,  a small sidestream is sent  to a purge  treatment section
 to  remove  the  sulfate and return  active solution  to the chemical
 section.   The  sodium  sulfate is precipitated from the  solution
 by  cooling in  a  chiller-crystallizer.   With controlled crystalliza-
 tion,  the  sulfate precipitates in a much greater  proportion  than
 the other  sodium compounds.  Thus, the  solid phase is  enriched  in
 sulfate while  the liquid  phase becomes  leaner.  The solid phase is
 separated  from the  liquid, and the latter is returned  to  the  ab-
 sorber.   The solid  phase  can be dried for sale or for  disposal.

 5.7.3  APPLICATION  OF THE WELLMAN-LORD  SYSTEM  FOR REVERBERATORY
        FURNACE S02  CONTROL
      Sulfur dioxide absorption efficiency  is controllable by
adjusting  process parameters at the absorber with most operating
systems producing 90 to 92 percent S02 recovery.
      The  S02  inlet concentration has a marked effect  on  the utility
requirements.  For a given amount of SOg to be recovered, as the
inlet concentration in the flue gas decreases, the  required amount
of  heating steam and cooling water increases.  As  the  concentration
of  oxygen  increases, the  size of  the purge  treatment section and the
chemical makeup requirement  will   increase.
     Oxidation of a  small  amount  of the solution   (sodium sulfite
to sodium sulfate) in the Wellman-Lord absorber creates the need
to purge a portion of the solution from the  system.  This purge

                                181

-------
has two effects:   (1) a chemical  makeup requirement,  and (2)  a potential
waste disposal problem.  About 1-1/2 to 3 percent of  the SCL  in the flue
gas entering the absorber will take part in the oxidation reaction form-
ing the non-reactive sodium sulfate for boiler control  applications as
claimed by Davy Powergas.     Other estimates are 10  percent.      Many
weak smelter gases have much higher oxygen content than power plant flue
gases, due to stream dilution by infiltrating air at  ESP's, waste heat
boilers, and leaky hoods and flues.  These higher oxygen concentrations
will presumably result in high sodium sulfate formation.  Also, there is
high S03 concentration in smelter gases which will further increase
sulfate formation.  Fractional crystallization has been used  to minimize
the purge stream and the chemical makeup requirements.
     The concentrated purge stream from this system can be dried
for sale or for disposal.  Potential markets exist for this
material in some areas of the U.S.
     With the absorption advantages of high concentration solution
scrubbing, L/G ratios are significantly less than those required
for the lime/limestone process, and power requirements for absorbent
recirculation are correspondingly less.  However, power require-
ments in the forced-circulation evaporator/crystallizer section
of the regeneration area tend to compensate for this saving.
     Steam requirements  in the evaporator/crystallizer  constitute
a significant proportion of the total energy needs of the process.
Single pass evaporation  steam demands appear to be as high as  12
Ib per Ib S09, but use of a double pass unit will reduce steam
                                105
consumption by about 40 percent.

      Although applicability to weak smelter gases has  not been
commercially demonstrated, the following advantages of  the process
are noted:
       1.   Sulfur dioxide absorption capability  is excellent and as a
           clear solution scrubbing  system, equipment maintenance, and
           operation  poses no  special problems.
                                182

-------
      2.  The process generates a high purity stream of S02 -
          around 85 percent, or higher if appropriate drying
          facilities are added.  This provides options between
          sulfuric acid, elemental  sulfur, or liquid
      3.  The process has enjoyed considerable commercial applica-
          tion and it appears that plants can be designed with a
          high degree of confidence as indicated by the performance
          guarantees being provided with the We 11 man -Lord installa-
          tion for the Northern Indiana Public Service Company
          (NIPSCO) on a 115 Mw coal -fired utility boiler.

      4.  The process can handle wide swings in S02 concentration.

The principle disadvantages of this system appear to be:

      1.  Oxidation in the absorbent, resulting in purging and
          loss of high cost sodium ions.   Fractional crystalliza-
          tion of the purge stream to separate and regenerate sodium
          sulfate is possible, but this approach is associated
          with both additional capital and operating costs.

      2.  Total  energy requirements of the overall  process,  i.e.,
          gas conditioning or SC>2 absorption and regeneration are
          appreciable and constitute a major part of the  total
          overall  operating costs.

As mentioned  previously, testing with actual reverberatory furnace
offgas  is required to confirm transfer of this technology to the

smelting industry.


5.8  COAL REDUCTION

5.8.1   GENERAL

      Various reduction systems that  have been used for reducing
S02 to  elemental  sulfur at smelters were reviewed.  The Claus
process and  Bureau of Mines Citrate process both utilize natural gas

for S02 reduction when H2S is not available.  The ASARCO brim-
stone process uses natural gas directly as the reducing agent.  Due
to the  present and future supply situation for natural gas, it does

not appear practical to consider it as a reducing agent for S02-
Coal, which  is in abundant supply in  the U.S. and probably will be
used much more frequently for reverberatory furnace firing in the
                                 183

-------
near future, seems to be the most logical reducing agent if sulfur is
required as the end product of an S02 control system.
     Sulfur dioxide reduction with carbon has been practiced in the
past by a few smelters.  The Boliden process operated at the Ronnskar
Smelter in Sweden was employed for gases relatively rich in S02.
At this plant, part of the smelter gas containing 11 percent SC>2 is
diluted with air, preheated, and then blown through a special gas
producer filled with coke.  The following reactions occur:
                                           2 (g)
                             »  2CO + 1/2 S2 (g)
     A number of minor reactions also occur
               CO + 1/2 S2 (g)   «    »  COS (g)
               C + S2 (g)   «	*  CS2 (g)
               H20 + C   ^   »  CO  + H2
               H2 + 1/2 S2 (g)   ^—*  H2S


      The reducing gas thus prepared is added to the remainder of the
smelter gas and both are passed through a catalyst chamber at 400°to
600°C.  The catalyst consists of coarse pieces of ferric oxide and
alumina.  The following reactions take place:
           S02 + 2 CO  «   » 2 C02 + 1/2 S2 (g)
           S02 + 2 H2  +    » 2 H20 + 1/2 S2 (g)
           S02 + 2 COS  «    » 2 C02 + 3/2 S2 (g)
           S02 + 2 H2S ^    » 2 H20 + 3/2 S2 (g)
           S02 + CS2   ^    » CQ2 +  3/2 S2 (g)

                                 184

-------
       These  reactions  do  not  go  to  completion  so  that  the  exit
 gas  always  contains  some sulfur compounds.  The gas  is  finally
 passed through  a  cooler where  the sulfur  is condensed;  sulfur mist
 from the  cooler is similarly removed by passing the  gas  through  a
 Cottrell  precipitator.

       Cominco,  at their Trail, B.C.  Smelter,  used  a  similar method
 for S02  reduction.   The S02  gas concentration was  essentially 100
 percent  and was obtained from  their  ammonia system (Section 5.6.3).
      In  the Orkla process  used at Rio  Tinto Co., Ltd.,  the  smelting
 and  S02  reduction feed  to  the  furnace  consists  of  the ore,  fluxes,
 and  a certain amount of coke.   In the  lower parts  of the furnace the
 sulfur is oxidized to S02-   In the top part of  the furnace  a reducing
 atmosphere  is created due  to the  presence of  coke, and  when the  gases
 from the  bottom containing S02 pass  through this section of the  furnace,
 S02  is reduced  to sulfur.  The gases are  then passed  through a hot
 Cottrell  precipitator and  thence  into  a condenser  where  the bulk
 of the elemental  sulfur is liquified;  a further small amount of
 sulfur is recovered  when the gases are passed through a  second (cold)
 Cottrell  precipitator.  A maximum of approximately 55 percent of the input
 S02  was converted to sulfur.   Details  of  the  Orkla system are pre-
 sented in Appendix V as a  reproduction of a paper  presented by Rio
Tinto Co., Ltd., personnel.  It contains  a discussion of the  S02
reduction chemistry that is applicable  to  the  reverberatory  furnace.
      The Resox  process, developed  by  Foster Wheeler Corporation,
reduces  sulfur dioxide to sulfur by using  crushed coal.   This system
is described in  detail in Appendix W.  It  is  claimed that it can
handle a  wide range of inlet gas compositions  and does not require
gas cleaning, drying or dust removal  systems.   Sulfur dioxide rich
gases (20 to 30  percent  concentration)  are reacted  with  crushed coal
at temperatures  as low as 1,200°F  in  a  reactor vessel.   The  S02
stream is reduced  to  gaseous  elemental  sulfur  and the liberated oxy-
gen combines with  a portion of  the coal carbon to form carbon diox-
ide.   The gases  leave the reactor  and enter a  sulfur condenser where
                                  185

-------
the sulfur is condensed to molten elemental  sulfur.   This system was
the tail end unit for the Scholz steam plant system  using the activa-
ted coke adsorption system developed in Germany to concentrate the
sulfur dioxide.
      Based on experience at smelters with coal reduction processes,
it appears that relatively high concentrations of input SOp gas has
been used.  There has not, however, been any major effort to use
these processes on reverberatory furnace offgases.  Furthermore,  the
well known water gas reaction with coal and steam generating CO and
H2 could be involved using coal reduction which then allows considera-
tion of this process as a gaseous reduction.  Separate production of
the reducing gas from coal would allow better system control but
introduces additional complexity, and cose which may not allow use of
this technique.  Costs must be compared to production and ship-
ping sulfuric acid.

5.8.2  COMINCO COAL REDUCTION SYSTEM
     The S02 gas from the Cominco ammonia concentration system at
nearly 100 percent S0£ (Section 5.6) was originally  reduced  by coal
to produce sulfur.   Cominco at Trail B.C.  operated the coal  reduction
plant from 1936 to 1943 with a rated capacity of 150 ton/day of
  i*   106
sulfur.
      The reduction plant as mentioned in Section 5.6 was shut-
down in 1943 when the demand for sulfuric acid for fertilizer
production exceeded the output of the acid plants.  The reduction
process employed the well-known reaction between sulfur dioxide
and incandescent coke.  The reaction is slightly exothermic, but
cannot support itself, so some oxygen must be added to the pro-
cess furnace to makeup the heat lost.
      The reducing reaction does not go to completion in the
furnace.  Various side reactions- take place, so the exit gases
contain considerable quantities of carbonyl sulfide and CO, and
at times, small amounts of carbon bisulfide as well as elemental

                                 186

-------
sulfur and C02.  Some S02 is added to the exit gases for catalytic
conversion of this carbonyl sulfide to sulfur by reaction with
so2.
      Gases from the top of the furnace, mixed with the required
amount of S02 to convert the carbonyl sulfide, pass through a
cyclone where coke dust is removed and then pass through a pre-
catalyst column which is a steel  vessel, "lined and packed with
fire-brick, where a greater part  of the carbonyl  sulfide is con-
verted.  The gas then passes through a waste heat boiler for
cooling to the optimum temperature for completion of the catalysis
and then through the catalyst column, a vessel similar to the pre-
catalyst column but packed with catalyst.  From the catalyst
column, the gas passes through a  second waste heat boiler where
it is cooled so that all the sulfur is condensed as a liquid or
 a  mist.   The  sulfur  mist  is  removed  from the  tail  gas  in  a
 electrostatic preci pita tor, and the tail  gas  is  scrubbed with
 water.
      Liquid sulfur from the waste heat boiler and the electro-
static precipitator runs into a settling pot and is pumped through
a steam-jacketed Shriver press for removal of a very small quantity
of extremely fine carbon which gives a greenish tinge to the sul-
fur.  From the filters, sulfur at a purity exceeding 99.99 percent runs
into heated tanks and is pumped to storage blocks.
      With coal availability and  a concentrated SOp stream, the
extensive 7 year experience with  this system would indicate
that reduction to sulfur has been demonstrated as feasible tech-
nology.  The requirement for concentrated S02 could, of course,
reduce the economic desirability of this approach.  The storage
flexibility of sulfur compared to sulfuric acid could strongly
influence the choice of this system in any given situation.   It
should also be noted that the minimum concentration of S02 that
can be efficiently processed with this system has not been deter-
mined.
                                187

-------
5.9  COMPARISON OF PRIMARY COPPER REVERBERATORY FURNACE AND POWER
     PLANT EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS
5.9.1   INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

      Since most FGD systems have been developed for utility
boiler offgases, an investigation into the differences between
these gases and reverberatory furnace offgases was conducted to
determine if the technology could be transferred.

      It became clear on review of available reverberatory furnace
data that it was limited in consistency and quantity.   The compari-
son indicates that furnace gases  have an 02 content slightly higher,
COp content about the same, HLO considerably higher for green
charge furnaces and about the same for calcine charge, and parti -
culate considerably higher than the power plant gases.   Particulate can,
of course, contain all of the trace metals found in ores being processed,
The effects of these metals, which can either cause physical plugging
or effect chemical or catalytic reactions, have not specifically
been determined.  However, the experience in Japan indicates that
the lime/limestone nonregenerative and MgO regenerative systems
can be used on either utility boilers or reverberatory furnaces.
The effects of trace metals that may pass through gas precleaning
systems on the citrate and ammonium regenerative systems also do
not seem to be significant since the systems have been demonstrated
on metallurgical gases.  Whether the Wellman-Lord system could be
used has yet to be demonstrated.   Experience also indicates that
the coal reduction systems can be used with smelter gases.
     Table 5-2 shows a comparison of conditions applied to the
Mitsubishi lime/limestone systems for oil-fired boilers, sintering
plants, and the reverberatory furnaces at the Onahama Smelter.

5.9.2  GAS COMPARISON
     Reverberatory furnaces usually operate with a draft of about
minus 0.1 inch water gage, and the combustion is usually regulated
                                 188

-------


M
U
*-«
4)
g
w

i«
u
&
o
U


tL
(4 (A
S3
M5
.5-
14 «
« 0)
s^
w



«
|^
01
a
o
«
•o
u
h
• »4
^
C!
O

o
o
o
•
s
1 +
o o
o 





•o
o
in
. O"
^4 0
1 1
0 O
O V
in


M _
uh «
rt/ I
§/ 1
w/
r^ 7
2 /
I/
s /
w /

/
/
/a
/ H
/ "*
/
>
g
1 +





et SO2
2 Removal
"a o
S w


Q©
^x v^
in
in .
0- .OO
cj* m ^4 fsj
i iii
moo



in o
o • o
t> 4V —1
i i i
in in o
0 . f
*o



"«r
o
*»
--* » O
o 2 2 o
o E g -.
1 idid '
0 °~T 0
o- °. * f>
r- in
i t
in o
><5 ^







^ i ^


•^
S «
0 _n
sorbent Utilizati
in Scrubber
rubber Control pH
idation in Scrub1
.0 " u X
< w 0




CO
-4
1
O
«"H




^
^^
I
O
t-»







**
~-4
1
O
^H




^^
44
ex
*«
*
i?



e
o
irry Concentrati
^
i— «
W

"3*
V
3
*• -s
«l sO O CO O
.O FH CM
3 o
g
U
(0
s*^



^
• ^
•a S_
Mr- < ^
•3 ' ' ' ^
x (M »i \o in ^
W "* — CL
1 •-* U*
« o W
" -W
D, o^
"*"

*»
o
_ m 55
*? r- ^
U -" 00 X
>3 o 	 ^o t)
B CM M • *» • „
'^ S0 ^4 rH O OO hC
h jj "^*
S ' ' ' ' ?• <
l~4 f**
o m o o in v^. .
O 00 - 0 3
U 0 PH . ,2
1 0 Wo •-
« • M O
" o o «
&. "



"iT "v T "jj

t-4 r-) r-4 IB
O O O g
> > > '3
— ' — — jj
t« >^ tii O


B
O
'•" w
• .oM°.3
a O O S Q
u
«
4
o
4>*
«l
•a
n
g
« (4 h
*• 0 «
? /> ^>
^••§•3
h h M
u U U
^ W W
"^ •" • C4
S * •
** O O
w ^ 55
O r"%.j-v

H
1 * ^'
(X .. -^ .. S 3
0 — . * »« " -11
S zz « & •? W u
U1.\*>OUC>H -
1 y -s m » ,j B
o K 4 N gg N
pg _ J> O " *^ »
°f . (X * 1-1
*• ™ Sk .-n r1 "^ «**
_ — A^0 C W ^
0 6'«4l
•*-•*» > .2
« t; u ^. .
3 "3 sfA
•H |_( Q U<] \J
g a
4) t>
•"»>•"
s. " SL *•
Ifr^ WC
»,3 ^^
Ml f^ 4> «-H
1^5
•§ "3
S s
w w
s 1
0 H












(B
•g
rt
E
^

                                        oo
                                        Q
                                        CD
                                        o
                                        a.
                                        o
                                        C\J

                                        m

                                         
-------
 so  that  a  slight  excess  of  air  is  used.   The  analyses  of reverbera-
 tory  flue  gases generally will  be  within  the  following ranges.
       N2   -  72 to 76 %              02  -   5 to 10 %
       C02  -  10 to 17 %             H20  -   4.0 to 10.0 %
       CO   -  0.0 to 0.1 %           S02  -   1.0 to 2.0  %
       The amounts of COp and HLO will depend upon the fuel used
 and the amount of moisture in the charge; the S02 content will
 depend upon the sulfur elimination from the charge.  A large part
 of the free oxygen found in the flue gases may be due to leakage
 of air through charging holes and other openings in the furnace.
 The gases will leave the furnace at a temperature of 1,800° to
 2,300°F (980° to 1,260°C).

      Power plant boilers will  generally be within the following
ranges.

       N2  -   80 to 85   %                02  -  3 to  8 %
       C02 -   10 to 14   %                S02 -  0.05  to 0.15  %
                                         H20 -  4 to  10 %
       Gas analyses obtained from representative smelters using
 green charge  (no roasters) with oil, gas, or coal and  boilers
 using oil and coal are  shown in Table  5-3.  These  values tend to
 be in the range noted in the above  summary with variations result-
 ing from individual measurements and operating conditions.

 5.9.3  DUST COMPARISON
       The amount of dust emitted by reverberatory furnaces will
 depend upon the fineness of the particles in the charge, the  method
 of charging,  etc.  The  dust itself may include anything in the
 furnace charge or formed by decomposition during melting which  is
 fine enough to be carried by the gas current.
                                  190

-------
 o r. 3     £T
 > n w m  >.***,
 o r-. n  o  co
                                                                  S
                                             •    •

                                              £°S S

                                              £   S »a
                                              vx  s^> CM
                     "So
"& -
-H O
                                                                   S     ?
                                                                    •     «
                                                                   o     *»
                                                                   o
                                                                   €4     O
                                                                 »
                                                                 5s
                                                                 •-
                                                     +J ^* CD   r—*


                                                     C
                                                     a;  u>  a>  
-------
      Fume, as differentiated from dust, refers to material
which has been volatilized or sublimed, and then condenses when
the gases become cooler.  The most important constituents found
as fine particulate in copper smelters are:
      1.  The lower, volatile oxides of arsenic and antimony
            As203 and Sb203.
      2.  Oxides of other volatile metals--e.g., PbO and ZnO.
      3.  Condensed water vapor.
      4.  Sulfuric acid and sulfates.  A certain amount
          of $03 gas is formed from the further oxidation
          of $62, and the higher the S02 content the
          greater will be the amount of 803.  The S03
          combines with water vapor to form droplets of
          sulfuric acid (HgSCty + water), or it may combine
          with certain basic oxides, notably ZnO, to form
          ZnS04.
     In practice, the dust and condensed fume are often mixed and
collected as a single product; usually the collected product is
called a dust--e.g., flue dust or Cottrell dust.
     Table 5-4 is a comparison of constituents in the particulate
for reverberatory furnaces and power plants.  Table 5-5 shows the
total grain loading comparison.
     The power plant dust contains less minerals, as would be
expected.
     Additional  reverberatory  furnace  dust analysis  (Table 5-5)
shows iron will  definitely be present.  It is also of interest to
note sulfur present probably as metal  sulfide.

5.10  APPLICATION OF FGD SYSTEMS TO REVERBERATORY FURNACE OFFGASES
5.10.1   CONTROL  OF GAS VOLUME FLOW RATE AND S02 CONCENTRATION
     As discussed in Section 3.0, the volume flow rate of gases leav-
ing the reverberatory furnace can be reduced by several techniques
including sealing of the furnace and oxygen enrichment.  The gas
volume flow rate in current U.S. practice is strongly influenced
by leaks with resulting large quantities of dilution air.  For
                                 192

-------
Table  5-4.  PARTICIPATE OUT OF REVERBERATORY  FURNACE
                       AND POWER PLANT
Element
Cu
Fe
Mo
Pb
Si
Al
As
Ba
Hg
Mg
Mn
Ni
Sn
W
Zn
Cd
Sb
Se
Cr
V
B
Te
Ca
A1
Be
Ti
Co
Kennecott (1)
Hurley
% b.w.
1-25
2-20
0.1 - 0.5
0.2 - 2.0
19-60
2.0
0.01 - 0.15
0.5
None
0.2
0.01
.001 - .02
0.1 - 1.0
None
2.0 - 30







0.4
2.1



Power (2)
Plant
% b.w.
0.02-0.065
0.9-11
0.004-0.03
0.01-0.21


0.004-0.008
0.02-0.2


0.01-0.04
0.02-0.05
0.002-0.007
0.02-0.21
0.001-0.008
0.02

0.004-0.06
0.04-0.12







Power (3)
Plant
% b.w.
N.D.
7.9

0.005






0.016
0.010
0.0043
0.0002
0.018
0.005
0.0079
0.026

















Inlet
to
ESP
j













    NOTE -  Elements may be in the form of oxides or sulfides

    (1)  Reference 39
    (2)  Reference 45
    (3)  Reference 47
                             193

-------
                  Table  5-5.   ANALYSES  OF SOME  DUSTS
                                 (In  percent)
Constituent0
Anaconda: Reverberatory
furnace; collected
under waste-heat
boilers. Sample No. 1
Anaconda: Reverberatory
furnace dust;collected
under waste-heat
boilers. Sample No. 2
Roan Antelope: Reverbera-
tory furnace dustb.
Cu
22.0



19.7




31.22
As
11.6



22.0




™
Sb
12.0



0.3




~
ZN
9.2



3.5




~*
Pb
3.4



2.3




~
Bi
1.4



1.5




~
S
0.7



0.1




5.7
Si02
9.0



5.7




19.82
Fe
14.2



10.7




3.9
Ca
0.4



0.6




2.2
A1203
1.5



2.7




11.37
aBarnard, E.A., and Tryon, George, Waste-Heat Boiler Practice at the Anacomda
   Reverberatory Plant:  Am. Inst. Min.  & Met. Eng.  Trans., Vol. 106, D.230, 1933.


 Wraith, C.R., Smelting  Operations at Roan Antelope, Idem., p.214.


cAs oxides or sulfides
                                      194

-------
example, the volume flow rate from one Onahama reverberatory furnace
system is 55,000 scfm compared to a range of 60,000 to 120,000 scfm
at typical U.S. Smelters.  Sulfur dioxide concentration (Section 2.0)
varies from 0.5 percent to 1.5 percent for U.S. reverberatory furnace
systems as compared to 1.5 percent to 2.6 percent for Japanese rever-
beratory furnace systems partly because of improved sealing.
     Thus, in considering the application of FGD systems, the reduction
of the gas volume flow rate and the increase of the S02 concentration
must be the first step to minimize the size and increase the efficiency
of these systems.  As discussed below, there will be some systems that
would not be applicable if gas volume flow rates and S02 concentration
are maintained as is present practice with reverberatory furnace
operation.  In all  cases, reduction of volume flow rate will reduce
system size with obvious capital  and operating cost savings.

5.10.2  BLENDING -  SULFURIC ACID PLANT
     Blending of gases from the main emitting equipment to produce a gas
stream of sufficiently high concentration (to be processed directly in
a sulfuric acid plant) is potentially possible if a fluidi bed roaster
is used.  Consider the following typical  example:
     Reverberatory volume flow rate - 100,000 scfm at 0.5% S02
     Converter volume flow rate (2 operating) - 100,000 scfm at 4.0% SO,,
     Fluid bed roaster volume flow rate - 50,000 scfm at 11.0% SO,,
     If all of these gases are blended, a combined S02 concentration of
4.0 percent is obtained.  As an average flow this would probably be suf-
ficient to operate a single contact sulfuric acid plant autothermally
most of the time.  It is probably too low to practically operate a
double contact plant autothermally.  The single contact acid plant will
effectively collect an average of at least 96 percent of the input S02.
     If the reverberatory furnace gases are reduced to that presently
being produced at the Onahama Smelter, then the following conditions
would be present:
                               195

-------
      Reverberatory furnace volume flow rate  -  55,000scfm  at
      0.5% S02
      Converter volume flow rate (2 operating)  -  100,000  scfm  at
      4.0% 502
      Fluid bed roaster volume flow rate -  50,000 scfm  at 11.0% SO
      With the above conditions, the blended S02 concentration would be
approximately 4.8 percent.   This  is probably marginal  for operation
of a double contact plant,but is  sufficient for operation of a single
contact plant to maintain autothermal  conditions.   In any case, the
lower the offgas volume and the higher the S02 concentration,the more
applicable becomes the blending technique.  Since  relatively little
additional equipment (except for acid  plant capacity) is required,  it
would appear that this approach has economic advantages.

5.10.3  LIME/LIMESTONE GYPSUM SYSTEMS
     As discussed in Section 4.2,the lime/limestone gypsum  system
is currently in operation on reverberatory furnaces at the  Onahama
Smelter in Japan.  The S02 concentration to this sytem is currently
2.5 to 2.8 percent.  Lower SOp concentrations  will  actually allow
this system to become more efficient in terms  of sulfur capture.
However, if this lower concentration is obtained by dilution, then
gas handling equipment will be inefficiently enlarged.  If  the re-
duced concentration is obtained by reducing sulfur elimination in
the furnace, then this advantage can be efficiently exploited.
     Because of the large quantities of water  (sea water) available
adjacent to the smelter, very little effort is given to reducing
the water requirements.  It is expected, as discussed in Section
4.2, that the water required can be reduced to the range of 5,400
gal/hr.
     The work at Duval also indicates  that at  least at the  lower
(0.5 percent) S02 concentrations, the  efficiency of a lime  milk
absorbent system operating with a TCA  absorber design can  be
99 percent with 96-98 percent availability.
                                196

-------
     It can be expected that the lime/limestone system can operate
satisfactorily with the current reverberatory furnace SOp concen-
tration of 0.5 to 1.5 percent.  In the lower portion of this range
where fluid-bed roasters are used, the reduced quantity of SC^
that needs to be processed will produce a lower quantity of solid
waste product and therefore will minimize handling and disposal.
Thus, the application of a lime/limestone system to those smelters
using fluid-bed roasters would be most applicable.  This would be
particularly the case where the smelter may be having difficulty
in selling the sulfuric acid that is being made from the roaster
and converter gases.  Space for disposal of the solid waste
product is readily available for most smelters.

 5.10.4  MAGNESIUM OXIDE SYSTEM
      As discussed in Section  5.4 the magnesium oxide system has been
 operated  satisfactorily on reverberatory furnace  offgas  at  the  Ona-
 hama  smelter in  Japan.   This  system produces  a concentrated gas
 stream from 10 to 13 percent  S02 which  can  be used  directly in  a
 double contact (or single  contact)  sulfuric acid  plant.   The MgO
 system will  require water  at  the rate of approximately  0.002 gpm /scfm
 The  requirement  for coke is relatively  low, and magnesium
 oxide is  the major remaining  input  constituent.   It is  expected
 that  this system can also  provide a control well  over 98 percent
 for  the reverberatory furnace.   Furthermore,  product flexibility
 is obtained because the concentrated steam  can be used  to make
 liquid SO^,  sulfuric acid, or sulfur.

 5.10.5  CITRATE  SYSTEM
      If the citrate system (Section 5.5)  is used  as a concentration
 system only, there has been sufficient  experience with  metallurgical
 gases to  indicate that it  can be operated with reverberatory furnace
 gases.  The concentrated S02  can be driven  off and  used to  produce
 either liquid SOp or sulfuric acid.   Reduction to sulfur may be
 possible  but additional development will  still be required.

                                  197

-------
     As the feed S02 concentration decreases, the quantity of strip-
ping steam required increases.  However, this is low pressure, gen-
erally considered, waste steam.  Typical steam consumption for
combustion gases of 0.3 percent S02 at 35°C and 90 percent recovery
is 7 to 8 tons steam per ton of S0?.  In comparison, this reduces
to 0.5 tons of steam per ton of S02 for gases of 5 percent S02-
     The sulfite oxidation rate is very low with this system —
0.1 percent as absorbed S02.

5.10.6  AMMONIA SYSTEM
      The ammonia system,which produces ammonium sulfate as well
as a concentrated S02 offgas, has been used successfully on reverbera-
tory furnace offgases.  The major problem with this system is that
a use must be obtained for the ammonium sulfate product which is  a
fertilizer that is not currently in great demand.   In addition, a
source of ammonia is required.  It does, however,  represent proven
technology.

5.10.7  WELLMAN-LORD SYSTEM
     With the Wellman-Lord  system,  as the inlet S0? concentration
in the  flue  gas  decreases,  the required  amount of  heating  steam and
cooling water increases.   As the concentration of oxygen increases,
the size of  the  first treatment section and the chemical  makeup
requirement will increase.   Approximately 1-1/2 to 3 percent of
the S02 in the flue gas entering the absorber will be oxidized
depending on oxygen availability.
      Since  this system has not been used on reverberatory furnace
offgas, it is unlikely that it would be selected unless it can
show considerable economic  advantages or actual operating data even
though it has had extensive experience at low S02  gas concentra-
tions in the utility industry.
                                198

-------
 5.10.8  COAL REDUCTION
      The only system that appears to have sufficient positive
experience is the one used at Trail, British Columbia by Cominco.
This system has had 7 years of operating experience using concen-
trated S02 gas obtained from their ammonia concentration system
using roaster offgases.
      The recent experience with the FW-BF Scholtz station dry ab-
sorption system producing sulfur would indicate that additional
development work is required.
      The FW-BF process is an adsorption process  and indicates
the greatest efficiency with low concentration gases.
      Coal  reduction processes used by Cominco and as  well  as
Boliden process at the Ronnskar smelter in Sweden used relatively
high concentrations of S02-  The Boliden process used 11  percent
S02 gas, and the Cominco process used 100 percent S0?  gas.   Thus,
experience indicates that it is necessary to provide a concentration
system before the coal reduction to sulfur process can be used for
reverberatory furnace offgases.  However, the low limit of S02 con-
centration for efficient reduction has not been determined.
      If a choice were required to either make sulfuric acid or
sulfur, the production cost of the acid would be less  than that of
sulfur.  However, if the acid could not be disposed of either  ex-
ternally or by use internally, then the additional process of con-
verting to sulfur would appear the better approach.  In other  words,
if it was necessary to neutralize the acid,consideration, parti-
cularly on a long term basis,should be given to reducing the S02
to sulfur with its considerably easier storage requirements (refer
to Section 5.11).
      Coal can also be considered as the source of a gaseous reduct-
ant, presumably CO within the process.  Thus, the alternative  is
also present of producing gas from coal in an independent process
and then using this gas as the reducing agent in a separate system.
                                199

-------
The additional  complexity is obvious,  but the more efficient gaseous
reactions could ensure direct reduction of the low concentration
reverberatory furnace gases.

5.11  S02 CONTROL SYSTEM PRODUCT PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL

5.11.1  INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
     As mentioned previously, the three major products that can be
produced from SO^ control systems are sulfuric acid, liquid sulfur
dioxide, or elemental sulfur.  Sulfuric acid concentration has been
standardized as either 93 or 98 percent, although various other
grades are produced.
     The major market for sulfuric acid is restricted to the 93
percent and above concentrations.  However, to produce phosphate-
type fertilizers, 60 to 70 percent acid strength can be used.  The
shipping problem,as previously discussed,will of course minimize
the use of this concentration unless the acid can be produced very
close to the point of use.  Sulfur trioxide dissolves in sulfuric
acid in all proportions forming fuming sulfuric acid, often called
oleum,which is sold on the basis of percent SO- content.
     Sulfur dioxide may be liquefied by the simple process of using
refrigeration and maintaining it under pressure.  It can be shipped
much greater distances and is a more storable product than sulfuric
acid.  While the market for liquid sulfur dioxide is limited,
available supplies of liquid SOp can be used to reduce the size of
smelter sulfuric acid plants reducing their capital and operating
costs.
     Gypsum produced by the lime/limestone system can be used
either in wall board cement or "thrown away."  It is a stable product
and can be placed on the ground or settled out in ponds if
proper environmental control procedures are followed.
                                200

-------
     The use of ammonia for absorption and production of ammonium
sulfate fertilizer as well as a concentrated steam of S02 has been
commercially demonstrated by Cominco.  However, the demand for
ammonium sulfate as a fertilizer is not as great as for phosphate
fertilizer primarily because of the latter's capability for flexible
mixes and potential for higher concentrations of nitrogen.  Also,
ammonia requires fuel to produce so its cost can be expected to be
related to the energy problem.
     Sulfuric acid can be expected to be the major SCL control system
product produced by copper smelters in the U.S.  As long as an econ-
omic market is available for each copper producer, either externally
or for internal use, systems producing this  product can be used.
Where acid disposal must depend on neutralization, systems producing
a gypsum product become attractive because of lower capital and
operating costs.  In addition, gypsum can be stored conveniently
in open piles because of its chemical and physical stability.
Sulfur  has the  same  storeability characteristics  as gypsum,  but
requires fuels for production.  Its potential U.S. marketability
can be expected to be greater in the U.S. than gypsum.

5.11.2  GYPSUM
     As indicated in Section 5.2, the lime/limestone system used
at the Onahama smelter produces gypsum for sale to wall board manu-
facturers.  This requires that the system be operated under the
conditions where the crystal size is closely controlled.  Large
bulky crystals are desired to minimize water adherence and also
to increase the strength of the wall board.
     Presently native mined gypsum is used by wall board manu-
facturers in the U.S.  In 1972, U.S. gypsum  producers mined
12,328,000 ton while 7,718,000 ton were imported primarily from
Nova Scotia, Canada.  Because of the low cost of water transporta-
tion, most imported material was shipped by  water to users on the
Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts.  In the  same year, 20,076,865
                                 201

-------
ton of gypsum were used in the U.S., and 14,205,000 ton of this
or 71 percent was used in wall board manufacturing.  In addition,
gypsum was used in agriculture as a soil additive, as  a retarder
in cement, and as a paint pigment.
     A large percentage of the eastern gypsum markets  use im-
ported material from Nova Scotia.  The wall board markets in the
midwest are supplied by native gypsum from nearby mines.
     Western gypsum was mined in Arizona, California,  Nevada,  Utah,
                           109
Iowa, Oklahoma, and Texas.      If it were produced by the smelters,
there would be direct competition.  If the gypsum could be sold
instead of treated as a throwaway product the return would be  a
gain for the smelters.  Thus, the sale price of Western-mined
gypsum and its shipping cost would be the controlling  factor.
With the wide availability of gypsum and additional byproduct
production from the chemical industry and powerplants, it appears
that only special localized situations would allow smelter sales.
     Gypsum has advantages over calcium sulfite for land filling
and discarding.  Gypsum can be grown into fairly large crystals
(SO to 300 microns), and moisture content of the centrifuge dis-
charge can be made as low as 10 percent.  On the other hand, the
crystal of calcium sulfite is normally very small (1 to 10 microns),
the centrifuge discharge contains about 60 percent moisture and is
similiar to paste.  Thus, the calcium sulfite may not  suit land
filling because of the high moisture which is not easily removed,
while gypsum would be useful.  Furthermore, calcium sulfite has
some potential for consuming oxygen in ambient water.   When gyp-
sum is discharged in a slurry form to a waste pond, it precipitates
much more eaily in small volumes than does calcium sulfite, thus
reducing the required pond size.  In the case of truck transpor-
tation, gypsum can be handled with great ease.
                                 202

-------
5.11.3  SULFUR/SULFURIC ACID

5.11.3.1  Overview
     Approximately 90 percent of the sulfur consumed is in the
form of sulfuric acid.  In reviewing the potential  supply and demand
situation, this close relationship necessitates simultaneous
consideration of both materials.
     Sulfuric acid has been established in industry as  the
lowest cost and most versatile of the mineral  acids for which
there is no satisfactory substitute for most applications.
This, in turn, makes sulfur one of the most important of the
industrial raw materials.   The consumption of sulfuric  acid
is frequently considered proportional to the gross  national
product of any nation.
     Sulfuric acid is widely sold in the form of various solutions
of HUSO*  in water or of SO-, in ^SO..      The latter, called oleums,
are marketed on the basis of the percentage of S03 present; 20
percent oleum means that, in 100 Ib, there are 20 Ib of S03 and
80 Ib of  H?SO«.  This 20 percent oleum, if diluted with water to
make hUSO,, would furnish 104.5 Ib.  For convenience, now grown
into an established custom, the ordinary solutions of sulfuric
acid and  water, up to 93 percent, are sold according to their
specific  gravity, or their Baume degree.  Table 5-6 illustrates
the sulfuric acids of commerce.  The usual temperature to which
specific gravity, or Baum'e (Be), is referred is 60°F for sulfuric
acids.  The specific gravity of sulfuric acid increases gradually to
1.841 at  60°F for 98 percent sulfuric acid, after which it decreases
to 1.835  at 60°F for 100 percent acid.  Consequently, in this upper
range, i.e., above 95 percent, the strengths are determined by other
means, such as electrical  conductivities, titrations, or temperature
rises.  For some of the medium-range oleums, however, specific gravity
is used.
                                 203

-------
Table 5-6.  COMMERCIAL STRENGTHS OF SULFURIC ACID (60  F)
For oleums, % means
free S03
Battery acid
Chamber acid, fertilizer
acid, 50 Be acid
Glover or tower acid, 60 Be
Oil of vitriol (0V), concen-
trated acid, 66
96% acid
100% H2S04
20% oleum, 104.5 acid
40% oleum, 109 acid
66% oleum
Degrees Be,
60'F,or
15.6*C
29.0

50
add 60
66
—
—
—
—
~—
Specific
gravity,
60*F, or
15.6'C
1.250

1.526
1.706
1.835
1.841
1.835
1.915
1.983
1.992
Sulfuric
acid, %
33.33

62.18
77.67
93.19
98.0
100.0
104.50
109.0
114.6
                       204

-------
      The  normal  strengths of commercial oleums fall  into three cate-
 gories:   10  to  35  percent free sulfur trioxide, 40  percent free sul-
 fur  trioxide, and  60  or  65  percent free sulfur trioxide.  The 20 to
 35 percent grades  can readily be  produced  in a single absorption
 tower, whereas  40  percent oleum generally  requires  two absorption
 towers in series.  Oleum containing 60 to  65 percent free sulfur
 trioxide must be made by distilling SO., gas out of  20 to 35 percent
 oleum, condensing  the 100 percent SO-, and then mixing it with ad-
 ditional  20  to  35  percent oleum.  The freezing point of 35 percent
 oleum is  about  80°F,  and for 40 percent oleum, about 94°F; conse-
 quently,  small  amounts of nitric  acid are  sometimes added to these
 grades to inhibit  freezing  during winter shipment.
      Fertilizer manufacture is the greatest single  use of sulfuric
 acid.  About a  dozen  different grades are  supplied,  each with a
 particular use.  Grades  of  53° to 56° Be' or stronger are employed
 in normal superphosphate manufacture.  The 60° Be' grade is used for
 sulfates  of  ammonia,  copper (bluestone), aluminum (alum), magnesium
 (Epsom salts),  zinc,  iron  (copperas),; mineral acids; organic acids,
 such as citric,  oxalic,  acetic, and tartaric;  pickling iron and
 steel before galvanizing and tinning; refining and  producing of
 heavy metals; electroplating; and processing of sugar, starch, and
 syrup.  The  66° to 66.2° Be' grades are utilized in  purification of
 petroleum products; preparation of titanium dioxide; alkylation of
 isobutane; manufacture of many nitrogen chemicals;  synthesis of
 phenol; recovery of fatty acids in soap manufacture; and manufacture
 of phosphoric acid and triple superphosphate.  Oleums are needed for
 petroleum, nitrocellulose,  nitroglycerin,  TNT, and  dye manufacture,
 and  for fortifying weaker acids.  There are many  other uses, as can
 be attested  to  by  the fact  that few chemical products are made  into
 which the manufacture of sulfuric acid does not enter in some way
 or other.

     The contact process is used to produce 93  percent to  100 per-
cent  acids and  the  various  oleums.  Most  66°  Be' and 60°  Be'acids are
obtained  by  dilution.

                                205

-------
     Sulfur is obtained by melting with  hot  water in  underground
deposits and pumping to the surface (Frasch  process)  or by various
processes from SCL or H^S with the source of the latter two from
sulfide ores or petroleum processing.   It is shipped  as a  liquid
in special rail tank cars, the availability  of which  sometimes
effects the supply situation.
       Sulfur in its various forms is  produced worldwide with  no
 one country being a predominant producer or supplier to world
 markets.  In 1975, world production amounted to 52 million tons-
 The United States is not only the largest producer of sulfur  in
 the world, but also consumes  more than  any  other country.  In
 1975, production totaled  11.26 million tons and consumption  10.6
 million tons.
       The major problem facing the domestic sulfur-producing
 industry, and to a lesser extent in the rest of the  world, is
 a very probable basic change  in the major sources of sulfur supply.
 Fundamentally, this will be brought about by the necessity for the
 removal of sulfur from solid, liquid,and gaseous effluents or
 wastes for the protection of the environment.  Secondarily, it
 will  be influenced by the forceable exhaustion  of cheap sources
 of noncombined sulfur.   U.S.  Bureau of  Mines predicts  that the
 enforced production of coproduct sulfur for environmental  reasons
                                                   112
 will  completely reverse the present supply  pattern.     Although
 in 1975, 64 percent of current domestic supplies of  sulfur were
 obtained from noncombined sulfur deposits (Frasch type),  the long-
 range expectation is that 83  percent will be obtained  from coproduct
                            113
 sources regardless of costs.      Additionally,  these later sources
 may provide an overabundance of supply, at  least regionally if
 not nationally (particularly in the form of sulfuric acid). The
 latter condition will  satisfy  the  needs of  the  consumers,  both
 in terms  of  amounts  and  price  levels.   However,  it will create
 problems  for  both  primary  and  coproduct producers.
                                  206

-------
     The nonsulfur industries affected by environmental necessities
require the development of'technologies that will permit them to
cover the capital and operating costs of coproduct sulfur re-
covery at cost levels that will be competitive with other
sources.  If such technology is not available,the industries
will be forced to absorb at least a portion of the cost of
coproduct sulfur production into the cost of their prime
product.  This added cost will be passed on to the consumers of
their basic products in the form of higher prices.

      A detailed discussion of the general sulfur/sulfuric acid
sources present uses, new uses, present product and consumption,
future market projection costs and pricing are included in
Appendix X.

5.11.3.2  Smelter Sulfur/Sulfuric Acid Market
     Acid plants have been used conventionally to control S02 from
the primary nonferrous smelters.  Presently, only streams contain-
ing high enough S02 concentration for autogenous conversion to sul-
furic acid are being treated.  Streams containing low S02 concen-
trations are discharged directly to the atmosphere.  But with the
increasingly stringent emission regulations, the smelters might
be forced to control S02 from the weak streams.  The smelters in
that case would have two alternatives: (1) either to use a regenera-
tive absorption system to produce elemental sulfur, liquid SO,,,
or sulfuric acid; or (2) to install  a nonregenerative absorp-
tion system, producing a stable throwaway product which could be
disposed of without any adverse effect to the environment.

      The quantity of sulfuric acid that a smelter can sell is de-
pendent on the other supplies of sulfur/sulfuric acid and costs,
distance of the smelter from the markets, etc (Appendix X). It is
obvious that a thorough marketing study for smelter sulfuric acid
can only be done by knowing the demand for sulfuric acid in various
                                 207

-------
regions of the country, the cost of making sulfuric acid in a con-
ventional acid plant using Frasch or recovered sulfur, the distance
of the markets from the smelters to determine the cost of transporting
the acid, etc.  These factors can also change with time.
      Determination of the quantitites of smelter acid that could
find a market, and the net return that the smelter could expect from
this acid, are very complex.  It is related to the distance of
the smelter from the potential markets and the cost of sulfur.
For a given sulfuric acid demand in a particular region, the
quantity of smelter acid that could be moved into the market is
dependent on the cost of the smelter acid to the user compared to
the cost of acid from conventional  plants.

     Table 5-7 gives the acid capacity, average acid production,
and ultimate acid capacity of the nonferrous primary smelters in
the U.S.  Based on the available information, the annual ultimate
acid capacity of the nonferrous primary smelters is more than
9.6 million tons.  The annual ultimate production of the Western
U.S. smelters (west of Mississippi River) is nearly 7.6 million
tons.  Due to the proximity of the markets to the smelters
in the Eastern U.S., smelter acid could compete very favorably
with the conventional acid plants producing acid with Frasch
sulfur.  The annual ultimate eastern smelter acid production
amounts to little over 2 million tons.  Due to the favorable mar-
keting conditions for the smelter acid, it could be concluded that
all the acid produced by the eastern U.S. smelters could be
marketed easily.

     Western U.S. sulfuric acid production from all sources in
1975 accounted for approximately 7.6 million tons or 16 percent of
                    114
total U.S. capacity.     This is about the same quantity that the
western U.S. smelters could potentially produce.  So under present
market conditions, the only way that the  smelters can sell all
their acid in the western U.S. is if they capture the entire mar-
ket in this area.  However, this is not possible because they will

                                 208

-------
 Table 5-7.   SULFURIC ACID NEAR TERM  CAPACITY  PRESENT
PRODUCTION AND ULTIMATE CAPACITY OF U.S.  NONFERROUS  SMELTERS
Smelter
COPPER
Asarco, Tacoma, Washington
Magma, San Manuel, Arizona
Kennecott, Hay den, Arizona
Kennecott, Me Gill, Nevada
Phelps Dodge, AJO, Arizona
Kennecott, Hurley, New Mexico
Asarco, Hayden, Arizona
rnelps Dodge, Morenci, Arizona
White Pine, Michigan
Phelps Dodge, Douglas, Arizona
Asarco, El Paso, Texas
Cities Service Smelter,
Copper hill, Tennessee
Kennecott, Garfield, Utah
Anaconda, Anaconda, Montana
Inspiration, Miami, Arizona
Near Term
Capacity
(ton/day)
200
2400
950
500
750
650
1008
3100
0
0
525
4010
1400
1100
1300
Average
Production
(ton/day)
120 (72)
1950 (74)
990 (74)
365 (73)
600 (Six days
in June '74)
146 (75)
545 (74)
105 (June 74)
602 (74)
580 (Last five
months of '74)
535 (Jan. '75)
465 (Feb. '75)
600 (73)
360 ('73)
450 (July '73)
430 (First 10
months of '74)
2000 (74)
0 (74)
0 (74)
404 (74)
4010 (74)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ultimate
Capacity
(ton/day)
800
2750
1035
1260
576
1550
1650
2900
330
2200
530
4050
N/A
N/A
N/A
                           209

-------
   Table  5-7.   SULFURIC ACID NEAR  TERM  CAPACITY PRESENT
PRODUCTION  AND  ULTIMATE CAPACITY OF U.S.  NONFERROUS SMELTERS
                            (concluded)
Smelter
LEAD
St. Joe Minerals Co., Lead Smelter,
Herculaneum, Missouri
Asarco, E. Helena, Montana
Asarco, El Paso, Texas
Amax, Boss, Missouri
Asarco, Glover, Missouri
Bunker Hill Co . , Kellog , Idaho
ZINC
Asarco, Corpus Christ!, Texas
Asarco, Columbus, Ohio
Asarco, Amarillo, Texas
National Zinc, Bartlesville,
Oklahoma
Bunker Hill, Kellog, Idaho
St. Joe, Monaca, Pennsylvania
New Jersey Zinc,
Palmer ton, Pennsylvania
Amax, Blackwell, Oklahoma
Near Term
Capacity
(ton/day)

300
475
280
200
0
300
225
175
0
275
650
1025
500
0
Average
Production
(ton/day)

173 (74)
N/A
N/A
240 (75)
0 (75)
230 (75)
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
Ultimate
Capacity
(ton/ day

355
448
331
280
290
335
N/A
N/A
250
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
500
  Near Term Capacity is the  existing acid plant capacity or planned acid plant
    capacity.
  Average Production is the  average actual production based on the available
    information.
  Ultimate Capacity is the ultimate quantity of acid that could be produced
    if all the S0~ from the  smelter is  converted to acid.
  N/A - Information not available
                                  210

-------
 have competition  from the recovered  sulfur from California  refineries
 and Canadian  recovered sulfur.   So the  smelters in  the western
 U.S.  will  have to find markets  for part of their acid in  the  Mid-
 west,  East, and Gulf  coasts.  How much  of  this  market they  can  cap-
 ture is  dependent on  the  acid market price,  the transportation  costs
 of the smelter acid to these markets, and  the pricing of  the  smelter
 acid.
      In  selling byproduct sulfuric acid, the marketer must  deal
 with potential  sales  resistance due  to  possible lower quality
 (impurities)  and  also with the  need  on  the part of  consumers  for
 dependable acid supplies.   Due  to the tendency  for  lower  quality of
 acid from  smelters, there are a few  sulfuric acid markets that
 may not  be available  to the smelter  acid.   But  for  most appli-
 cations, the  quality  of the smelter  acid can be assumed acceptable
 since  it is used  in such  large  quantities  today,  and the  only re-
 maining  question  is whether or  not markets exist  or could be  de-
 veloped  for the increased quantities of acid that might be  produced
 by the Hestern  smelters.
     Sulfuric  acid consumers generally desire low price, high
quality,  and  dependability. For these reasons,  many large sulfuric
acid consumers choose  to purchase sulfur and produce sulfuric  acid
onsite.  Heat generated when sulfur  is burned can also be  used for
other plant processes.  At $1.25 per  mill  Btu,  byproduct steam
represents  an energy credit of  approximately $5/ton  of sulfuric
acid produced.     For byproduct smelter acid to displace  this
acid it must  not only  be sold  at less than  the  integrated  acid
producer's  variable cost,  but  it must also  compete with  this
energy credit on a delivered cost basis.

      Sulfuric acid plants are widely scattered through  the U.S.
chiefly because of the  bulk value of acid, difficulties  of handling
the acid in the bulk, and  subsequent high  cost  of shipment as com-
pared  to elemental sulfur.  Therefore,acid has  been traditionally
produced by sulfur-burning  plants near  the point of consumption in

                                 211

-------
captive use.  However, with the recent advent of regional im-
balance in sulfuric acid supply and demand,more distant rail ship-
ment and, to some extent, ocean transportation,  has  become  more
important.

      Many existing conventional sulfuric acid plants are old and
will soon need replacing.      Producers in this situation will
possibly  like the opportunity to buy abatement acid in lieu of
building  a new plant.  Some not-so-old conventional acid plants
will have to put in control systems to control the emissions from
their tail gases.  If the cost of byproduct smelter acid is less
than the  operating costs of these conventional plants, they might
close down their plants and buy the smelter acid.
      Smelter acid, since it would be produced nearby, could cap-
ture the  entire market for acid in the mountain states.  On the
other hand, very little market could be captured in the southwest
central  region.  The  primary reason is that the market located along
the Gulf  coast is a considerable distance from most of the western
smelters, and acid can be produced there at relatively low cost from
Texas and Louisiana Frasch sulfur.
     Acid from the smelter in Washington could find markets in
Washington, California, and adjacent states.  Smelters from Utah-
Nevada could find markets for all of their acid  in Utah, Nevada,  Kan-
sas, Missouri, and Oklahoma.
     Smelters located in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas are not as
well-situated to supply  sulfuric acid for fertilizer manufacture.
The nearest source of phosphate rock is northern Utah, Wyoming, Idaho,
or Montana.  The agricultural markets that could be  supplied from
fertilizer  plants using  acid from Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas
smelters lie primarily  in California, Arizona, and New Mexico, with
a smaller market in  far  west Texas.  However,  part of this  sulfuric
acid  for the fertilizer in  this area would  come  from sulfur recovered
from refineries  in California.  Another possible market that could be
captured by the  acid  from these smelters would be the  phosphate
                                212

-------
fertilizer market in Kansas and Nebraska.   Fertilizer could be made
in Kansas from phosphate rock from Idaho,  and acid could be made from
smelters in Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.   But they will  be in com-
petition with fertilizer produced in Florida from Florida phosphate
rock, and acid made from Gulf coast Frasch sulfur.

      Uranium ore processing and copper leaching represent two
relatively bright areas in the sulfuric acid end use scheme.  Copper
leaching has recently become more attractive, partially because of
the  ready  availability  of  byproduct  sulfuric acid  from  smelter
gases and  partially because  of  hydrometallurgical  process  de-
velopments for metal recovery from ore tailings.   The impetus for
such research has been the need to develop technology which would
satisfy  the  current standards of  clean air  legislation.
      Leaching of  low grade  copper ores in  Arizona,  New Mexico,
and  Texas  region is rapidly  becoming an important  use of acid.
Many of  the  copper companies operating smelters  in this  region  per-
colate weak  sulfuric acid  solutions  through their  mine  dumps and
wastes whose copper contents are  too low  to justify concentrating
in a conventional mill.  The solutions dissolve  some of  this
copper which is recovered  by cementation  when the  solutions  are
passed  through launders full of shredded  cans.   A  few companies
are  leaching higher grade  ores  from  smaller deposits.   One com-
pany is  recovering  anode grade  copper by  using  solvent  extraction
to prepare a low iron-copper sulfate solution suitable  for direct
electrolysis to deposit the  copper.
      Smelters from Arizona, New  Mexico,and Texas  could also supply
the  acid requirements of some uranium mills in  the southwest.   If,
as  predicted by  some  experts,  there is a  shortage of sulfur in  the
future,  it would be possible to export the  recovered sulfur from
California and the smelter acid could  take  over the domestic market.

     Smelters in Idaho  and Montana  appear to be  better  located  to
supply  sulfuric  acid  for the production of  phosphate fertilizer.

                                 213

-------
About 16 percent of the phosphate rock mined in the U.  S.  comes from
nearby Idaho, Montana, northern Utah, and northwestern  Wyoming, and
the smelters are near large and growing markets for fertilizers.   The
acid from this region might get some competition from Canadian re-
covered sulfur, but this competition could be expected  to  decrease
as the recovered sulfur production decreases in the future.   Uranium
processing represents an increasing potential market for sulfuric
acid produced by smelters in this region.  Uranium processing is
expected to increase in eastern Washington and Wyoming  in  the future.
It is also possible for the smelters in this region to  make ammonium
sulfate and sell it as a fertilizer.
      It is quite possible that all the smelters might not be  able to
sell all their acid or use it internally.   If the acid markets are
very far away from a smelter, the smelter acid may not be able to
compete  with conventional acid, owing to the very high transportation
cost.  But it might be possible to  produce  elemental sulfur and  ship
it to these markets.  Some FGD systems described in Sections  produce
elemental sulfur.  Since sulfur is  the preferred product from  the
marketing point of view, it appears desirable to further develop the
FGD systems to economically produce this  product.

5.11.3.3  TVA Market Study
     TVA has been conducting studies focused on elemental  sulfur as
well as sulfuric acid as a potential byproduct from FGD processes
installed in power plants located in the states served by the  inland
                               I I O
waterway system in eastern U.S.     They are in the process of pre-
paring a final report covering full assessment of markets for
abatement sulfur and acid from all sources  in the 48 contiguous
states of the U.S.  The objectives were outlined to provide general
and practical information concerning the current production, dis-
tribution, use of sulfur and sulfuric acid  in the U.S., and its
effect on abatement products.  The study indicated a potential Frasch
sulfur shortage in the next 10 to 20 years.
                                 214

-------
     The Frasch sulfur industry is dominated by a few large pro-
ducers.  The industry is concentrated, and production is centralized
in a few mines located within a small region of the Texas and
Louisiana Gulf Coast.  The marketing system is highly organized
and specialized.  It has the flexibility of marketing either elemen-
tal sulfur or sulfur in the form of sulfuric acid.  Most molten sulfur
is shipped by water from the mines or transhipment terminals on the
Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast to the marketing terminals.  Marketing
terminals are strategically located either on the inland waterway
system or along the east coast adjacent to ports served by deep-
water vessels.   From the marketing terminal, molten sulfur is
transported by barge, truck, or rail  directly to the point of con-
sumption.

      Capital and operating costs for mining sulfur by the Frasch
process, marketing terminal storage, manufacturing acid by the
contact process with storage, and controlling acid plant tail gas
emissions were calculated by TVA to determine the competitive
costs of sulfur and acid production.
      By the use of power plant design and operating data pro-
vided in the U.S. Federal Power Commission Form 67, a data bank
was constructed  by TVA to accommodate key operating parameters  for all
power plants in the U.S.  Parameters such as fuel type, sulfur in
fuel, boiler heat rate, fuel consumption, on-stream time, age of
plant, etc., are vital.  Using these data, possible output of
byproduct can be calculated for each power plant - given the
level of S02 control designated by March 1975 SIP standards.

      With the large data base available from FPC Form 67, it was
possible for TVA to create  a more accurate screen to center on the most
promising power plant candidates for abatement byproduct produc-
tion.  Earlier work by TVA for EPA contains well defined in-
vestment and operating cost estimates of the five leading FGD sys-
                                                              120
terns based on key power plant design and operating parameters.     In
                                 215

-------
the EPA-TVA cost report,  two of the processes  (the magnesia
slurry scrubbing-regeneration process  producing 98 percent sulfuric  acid,
and the sodium solution-SCL reduction  process  producing  elemental
sulfur) produce saleable  byproducts.   The costs of these processes
can be compared with those of the throwaway limestone slurry scrub-
bing process in deciding  what scrubbing strategy is to be adopted
for each boiler or plant  where appropriate.
      For boiler operators who do not  select an alternative  stra-
tegy, such as clean fuel  substitution, the question remains  as to
whether they would produce (1) sulfuric acid,  (2) sulfur, or (3)
a throwaway sludge.  While the sulfur  alternative was modeled by TVA,
production costs with current technology were high enough that
this alternative did not require a computer run to conclude  that
sulfur would not be chosen over acid at any boiler.  The throw-
away sludge alternative was analyzed in detail since it is the
lowest cost scrubbing method.  In this case marketing revenue
would have to exceed the cost differential for a given boiler be-
fore acid production would be selected.
      An extremely important component of  the  TVA model  is  the  trans-
portation data base for computing accurate shipping costs for
sulfur and sulfuric acid.  Since shipping cost is an essential
element in the price of acid and sulfur, a great deal of creative
and complex effort was required to derive  usable values for the
entire U.S.
      As a part of the model design, it was assumed by TVA that the  sul-
furic acid market can be simulated as though all consumption oc-
cured at sulfuric acid plants, and that acid-producing firms would
close these plants and buy abatement acid  if acid  prices were
below their expected long-run average total cost.   It was also
assumed that  steam plants would produce sulfuric acid or sulfur
if  that were  the  least costly alternative  for meeting clean air
requirements.  Long-run competitive equilibrium market conditions
can be simulated  by minimizing the cost to both the sulfuric acid
and power  industries.  In this framework,  power plants were assumed
                                216

-------
free to produce or not produce sulfur or sulfuric acid and to sell
to any sulfuric acid plant in competition with other power plants.
Likewise, the sulfuric acid plants were assumed free to continue
buying sulfur from traditional sources or from power plants,  and
free to buy acid in lieu of production subject to competition in
their respective industries.
     The TVA model considers  the total cost of both the sulfuric
acid and power industries and chooses the set of alternatives that
minimize the total cost.  Sulfuric acid producers are given a choice
of continuing production or buying acid from steam plants.  Steam
plants not meeting SIP are given the choice of (1) selecting  a
clean fuel strategy, (2) selecting a calcium sludge scrubbing tech-
nology, or (3) selecting a sulfuric acid or sulfur-producing  scrub-
bing technology.  In the latter case, product would then be available
to supply sulfuric acid plants if they choose to buy it.  The mix
of abatement strategies and marketing patterns resulting in the
lowest possible cost to the combined industries is said to be optimal.

       At a  very high  supply  cost from power plant producers,  only
 a few acid  plants would be better off buying rather than  producing
 sulfuric acid.   These plants tend to be old,  low-volume producers
 far from sulfur supplies.  As supply cost declines,  very  high-
 cost producers  disappear rapidly and the  demand  curve for abate-
 ment acid flattens.   At low  supply costs  from power plants,  all
 but the  largest,  most modern acid plants  located near sulfur sup-
 plies would  buy rather than  continue production.   Small quantities
 of abatement acid could then be marketed  at high value but as the
 supply increases  the  value declines.
       It was concluded in the TVA study that when sulfur  value is
 $60/ton  f.o.b.  Port Sulfur,  there would be no power plant produc-
 tion without regulations for emission control.   As plants are forced
 to take some action,  the cost of alternative controls can be con-
 sir!ered as  a credit to recovery processes and provides the basis
 for assigning a sulfuric acid market adjustment value.  The  pre-
                                217

-------
liminary results from the study indicate that a significant amount
of byproduct sulfuric acid could be moved within the present mar-
ket structure at a sales value high enough to make sulfuric acid
                                                       121
FGD process competitive with throwaway sludge systems.
     The possibility of applying the TVA computer program to the
smelter acid marketing study appears promising and will be pursued
in the near future.

5.11.4  LIQUID S02
     The demand for liquid S09 in the U.S. is very limited.  The
                                                                 123
current U.S.fliquid SO,, capacity is approximately 177,000 ton/yr.
The single largest use for SOp is in the production of sodium
hydrosulfite which in turn is used as a bleaching agent in the
production of textiles, paper, and clay.  The use of SOp in pulp
and paper manufacture is dwindling due to more stringent controls
on SOp emissions.  Other uses for liquid SOp, including refining
and food processing, are expected to offset the lower demand in
pulp and paper.  The result will be that liquid SOp demand is ex-
pected to increase at an annual rate of approximately 4 to 5 percent
                        124
during the next 5 years.
     Owing to the relatively high price per unit weight of liquid
S0p» unlike sulfuric acid, it can be shipped long distances to serve
various markets.  Due to the stable markets, the supply/demand
situation for U.S. liquid SOp is in balance.  An increase or decrease
in production of 10,000 to 20,000 ton/yr, representating 6 to 12 per-
cent of estimated 1975 consumption, would significantly disrupt the
                         125
market for this chemical.
     Since the  liquid SOp market in the U.S.  is  very small and  is
already in balance, the possibility of a  nonferrous smelter putting
in a system to  produce  liquid SOp exclusively for  sale  is  not likely.
However, liquid SOp can be used to  smooth out the  feed  to  the acid
plant to compensate for the smelter offgas fluctuations.   This  tech-
nique can also  be used  to reduce the size and cost of acid plants
installed at the smelters.
                                 218

-------
5.11.5  ACID NEUTRALIZATION
5.11.5.1  General
     In the copper industry, almost all  of the sulfur recovered is
in the form of concentrated sulfuric acid.  Presently, all  the
sulfuric acid produced by copper smelters is either used internally
or is marketed.   In case the copper smelters are unable to  market
their sulfuric acid, storage facilities  and/or acid disposal  facili-
ties must be available.   This situation  could occur if the  smelter
is located far from the acid markets and are unable to consume the
acid internally.  Before installing an acid neutralization  facility
at any specific  smelter, a detailed engineering, marketing, and
economic analysis would be performed to  ensure that acid could not
be used for additional copper production through leaching,  sulfuric
acid based chemical products, gypsum products, and production of
elemental sulfur.

       There are generally two types of  neutralization processes  for
 sulfuric acid disposal, so-called  "wet"  and "dry".   In the "wet"
 process, neutralization reaction takes  place in dilute acid-water
 solution and produces a calcium sulfate  slurry  for disposal.   The
 neutralization  reaction in the "dry" process takes  place directly
 between concentrated sulfuric acid and  limestone producing a plastic
 mass that eventually turns into a  dry solid for disposal.
     Limestone  is  usually  the cheapest chemical  for the neutralization
of acid,  although  using lime would  permit smaller reactors with less
retention time  owing  to the higher  reactivity of lime.  But lime  is
fairly  expensive compared  to limestone.    Limestones are carbonate
rocks or fossils composed  principally of  calcium carbonate or combina-
tions of calcium and  magnesium carbonate with various  impurities.
Hill and  Milmouth  report that limestones containing magnesium react
                                                      I OC
more slowly than those  composed of  calcium carbonate.     Also, neu-
tralization rate has  been  shown to  increase with increasing fineness of
limestone, the  limit  of this being  economic because the cost of grind-

                                 219

-------
ing increases sharply as particle size decreases.   If appreciable
amounts of magnesium are present in the limestone  used for neutralizing
acid, leaching of the magnesium salts  from the disposed waste could
become a problem.
      The limestone source is of crucial  importance in the neutrali-
zation reaction.   Large differences in reactivity  can be experienced
depending upon the type of limestone used.  It is, therefore, very
important that the actual limestone to be used in  the commercial
process be the basis of limestone neutralization studies.
     Davies et al of Kennecott Copper  Corp.,  briefly describe the
                                              127
"dry" and "wet" acid neutralization processes.     The "wet"  pro-
cess causes the neutralization reaction to occur in dilute acid-
water solution and produces a calcium  sulfate slurry for disposal.
The neutralization reaction in the "dry"  process occurs directly
between concentrated sulfuric acid and limestone producing a  plas-
tic mass that eventually turns into a  dry solid for disposal.
     Little direct experience exists for disposal  of concentrated
sulfuric acid, except by dilution.  There are, however, excellent
process analogies available in the fertilizer industry where  wet
process phosphoric acid is made by reacting phosphate rock with
concentrated sulfuric acid in a slurry system, and normal super-
phosphate is made on a dry basis by the same  reactants in a pug mill
or TVA cone.  Much of this technology  is  therefore directly adaptable.

      A most important factor in the design of neutralization facili-
ties is the disposal method for the calcium sulfate waste produced.
Transport problems, effect on water hardness, effect of dissolved
salts on ground water, effect on tailings pond, dusting problems,
water requirements, piping scaling, and dry material stability must
all be considered.
                                220

-------
5.11.5.2  Dry Process
      The process flow diagram for acid neutralization by thfe "dry"
process is given in Figure 5-20.  Fundamentally,  the dry process is
the reaction of ground limestone and acid in a "blunger", paddle
mixer, or a pug mill.  This type of equipment is used to manufacture
normal superphosphate fertilizer by reacting sulfuric acid with
ground phosphate rock.  The pug mill produces a soupy, sticky mass
which requires aging to complete the reaction.  Aging occurs
on a wide slow-moving conveyor.  At the end of this conveyor, a
solid continous mass exists, more or less dry, which must be broken
up into granular fragments for subsequent handling.
      This process produces principally anhydrite, CaSO*, and
hemihydrate, CaSO^-l/Z^O; the reaction heat is  sufficient to
heat the end products beyond the point where gypsum (CaSO*'2H20)
dehydrates.  The reaction products will hydrate, at least partially,
to gypsum or to hemihydrate upon exposure to atmospheric moisture.
      Crushed mine limestone is stored in a limestone silo which
feeds a grinding mill.  The milling system is equipped for closed
circuit grinding with provision for dust collection in a baghouse.
The ground limestone (80 percent minus 100 mesh) is fed to the pug mill  at
a controlled rate through a weigh feeder.  The acid to be neutralized
is also fed to the pug mill at a controlled rate through an acid
flowmeter.  Since the reaction in the pug mill is exothermic, fresh
water is added to the reactor to control the temperature.  Fresh
water addition also provides the output product with proper consis-
tency.  Control of the process is by visual inspection of the pug
mill mass and adjustment of the acid flow to suit the operator's
experience.
      The reacted mass from the pug mill is discharged onto a slow
moving conveyor and the mass cures.  The conveyor carries the mass
to a cutter which cuts the solid mass to small pieces to facilitate
its handling.  This cut mass goes to a mobile haulage station for
final dry disposal.  The gases from the pug mill are scrubbed before
being discharged to the atmosphere.
                                 221

-------
                                               0)
                                               o
                                               o
                                               s_
                                               Q.
                                                C
                                                O
                                                
-------
5.11.5.3  Wet Process
      The process flow diagram for acid neutralization by the "wet"
process is given in Figure 5-21.
      Crushed limestone from the limestone silo is fed to a wet
grinding  ball mill where  limestone is  ground  to a slurry  (80 percent
minus 100 mesh  particle size).  This slurry is then  pumped to the
neutralizing reactor  station which consists of two or more reactors
operating in series.
     Acid is pumped to the first reactor  at a controlled  rate.   The
operator  controls the acid rate by remote control of pump speed  to
maintain  the proper sulfate concentration (0.2 to 0.5 percent) in the
outlet of the second  or last reactor.  A  constant recycle of slurry
(approximately  50 percent recycle) is  maintained to  control scaling
and  to promote  gypsum crystal growth.

      Reactor temperature is controlled to 71°C  (160°F) by adding
fresh water and evaporative cooled reclaim water recycled from
the  disposal pond.  The neutralization reaction  is quite  exo-
thermic  (it generates approximately  725 Btu/lb of H^SO. neutralized)
and  thus  requires cooling or large water  excess  to control the
temperature.  The reactor system is  designed  to provide 2 hours
retention time.
      Waste gypsum slurry is  discharged to the tailing pond by
gravity flow.   The tailing pond provides  area for cooling by surface
evaporation  and for ponding  of water.  In the design.it has  been
assumed that the tailing will  retain  40 percent moisture, and the
remaining water is recycled to the reactor system.

5.11.5.4  Cost Considerations
      Both wet and dry acid neutralization processes  are technically
feasible.   However,  the choice of neutralization  process must be
based on  the particular circumstances existing at each plant location.
The cost of limestone, as  well  as  the limestone grind required for
                                  223

-------
                                                  0)
                                                  o
                                                  o
                                                  S-
                                                 Q_
                                                  I


                                                  o


                                                  (C
                                                  3
                                                  0)
                                                  -o
                                                  •r~
                                                  u
                                                  eC

                                                  O
                                                  3
                                                  co
                                                  CM

                                                  LO
                                                  OJ
                                                  CD
224

-------
 efficient reaction, are sensitive cost parameters and require careful
 evaluation for each application.  Final costs will be influenced by
 limestone transportation, acid transportation, plant site and disposal
 area land availability, waste product transportation to the disposal
 site, and utilities availability.  Table 5-8 gives the wet and dry
 hUSO, - limestone neutralization process evaluation summary given
                  128
 by Davies et al.
       Other than direct process-related capital and operating costs,
 the decision rests on the disposal method for the  byproduct calcium
 sulfate, management of the disposed  byproduct from the environmental
 and cost viewpoint, process reliability and ease of operation, lime-
 stone source and reserves, and water restrictions.
       Full engineering and economic analysis of both the wet and
 dry process under conditions that exist at any given plant location
 must be undertaken to determine true overall capital and operating
 costs.  A cost advantage of one process over the other can emerge
 if, for example, limestone costs are high, or pond disposal manage-
 ment is inordinately expensive.

5.12  SUMMARY
     Two processing systems emerge as feasible for reverberatory
S02 offgas control.  The first system would eliminate the S02
through production of a throwaway product.   The other would  include
systems designed to upgrade the weak S02 gas to one amenable
either directly or by blending with converter and/or multihearth
roaster offgases for conversion to sulfur acid.  Thus,  for the
latter approaches, offgases processed in a sulfuric acid plant will
limit S0? emissions to 650 ppm for a double contact acid plant,
or 2,600 ppm for a single contact sulfuric acid plant.
     The background information developed for the new source per-
formance standards for primary copper smelters investigated
                                                               1 pq
scrubbing systems  capable  of handling weak  stream S02 offgases.
During  the  past 40 years,  over 50 process schemes  utilizing
various  types  of absorbents  as scrubbing media have been investiga-

                                 225

-------
 >-

 <

 s:

 oo

 o
OO
00
 _
o
a:
a.
o
t-H

<
UJ
O
I—
OO
o
oo
  CM
Q


Q
Z
<
oo
 i
LT>

CU
r—
-Q
to
Ul
in
4)
U
O
IH
C.

X
r<
Q

















in
in
4)
u
o
IH
IX

4->
4>



























O
O
O
«t
O l/>
o o>
CM >
• t*«
^
*» «r>


















O
o
o
»
CO \O
0 0
Is- •
* p^
^

•n
4>
^
•H
4)
C TJ
0
^ 4-> C
•» 00 0
O r. C 4J
W 4> -H ^.
CM (Xn3 i— 1
X 3 *»
4-* 1-4
*» in u o>
4J M 0 C
in O> U -rt 4)
0 C
CJ • OO 9 O
Q 13 O 4J
--t ~«. -rt 1/3 M
rd H *J CM 4)
4-1 cd X E
•rt 0 I* -rt
(XO D ** J
Cd f> O.K1
(J •— ' O cji




fc/)
1-1
•
o
CM
*»






















CM
CM
•
I/I
CM




3
m
rH
3
in

*4H
O

r*
OTJ
V 4)
N
I* *rt
4) rH
(Xrt
IH
4J 4J
in 3
O 4)
tj C



Tj
4>
ft
O
rH
4>

4)
0



















•rt.
4>
O«
O
rH
4>
^»
4)
a












in
3
4J
rd
4J
(/)

in
in
4)
U
O
fH
0.
o
o
DO

1

IH
• rt
Cd
U.
























Ti
O
O








X
4J
•r4
i-l
•H
.0
cd
•rt
rH
41
Qi

in
in
41
U
O
u
a,
mewhat more
control and
ce
o 4J a
in I-H cd
3 C
i U 4)
•rt 4-1
T) *w rj
OM-l-rt
O -rt cd
O T3 B









rH
O
^
4J
C
o
u

x
in
cd
4>

i

•^
o
o








X
4J
•rt
rH
•rt
JS
rt
|H
4)
O.
O

in
in
4)
u
O

D.
•O
C
o
tx
E
in
(X
X
oo
o

4)
rH
•rt
ft

X
£4
Q

















*O
C
O
ex

B
3
in
a.
X





*rd
o
JS

4)
s

rH
cd
in
0
(X
in
• rt
a

E
3
in
ft
X
0
o
10
CM
X
e
0
cd
00

00
CM
rH
1
K!
00

C'
O

*3^** E
O i-H -rt
W rt rt
CMOOrH
x o
O 4)
IH to IH
O oo
-4-1
CrH 3
O 0
4J • •>,£
--. E 4->
rH -rt -rt
cd cd S
00 rH
O «*
0 4) O
•«»•,- to
in CM
i 43 X
^* 4->
CM .rt 14-1
ro S O









e
o
•rt
4-1
ft
E
3
in
C
o


cd

££ control
dust control.
0 *
a-o
3 4)
IH rl
•rt
C 3
•rt O4
rt v
d M
h
i Ofi 4>
C C 4J
O -rt Cd
O 4J 3
in
IH 3T3
4) T3 C
4-> O
« 4> eu
3: B
•a o
Cm*
3 in
O »i-H
rl"0 rH
OO 4) rt
r- »

e 3T»
n o- c
4) 0
UH IH ft

OrH £
COO
3 IH ^
OS 4->lM
V)
C
O
• rt
cd

4>
"O
•rt
in
C
o
CJ

rH
cd
4-1
C

O VI
MH Cd
U
•a
•rt -O
u c
rt O
ft
X
rH E
ij 3
J3 in
OO (X
•rt X
•H 00
VI
4)
4> 4J
x> rt

I-H rt
rH ft
•rt 4>
3 in


























ss disposal of in
t tailings pond,
as wet process.
4) C 41
rH rt E
C rH fd
3 (X M

41 C C
C-rt 4)
O OS J3
z: E 4-
1 S
in 3 i
•rt W rH
Q ft'rt
X cd
C 004->
• -rt
T) <4H 4J
C {X-rt C
O 3 Rl
ft Tl 1* rH
rH 4> O.
4) -rt 4->
4J 3 Cfl C
« J3 * -rt
IH Cd
cd in IH B
CX4-* O
1) i-H 4J O
in rt rt 4J

t4H 4-1 4^
•rt T> C C
4) 4> 4)
4) > U in
C rH C
O O O VI
"Z V> U -rt




fa
o
4J
cd
IH

C
4>
o

o
u

c
O

4J
u
4)

I4H
U)




























•
TJ
a
o
ex

in
oo
a
• rt


























                                              226

-------
 ted  primarily  for  the  utility  industry.   This  has  been  on  a  bench-
 scale,  pilot-plant,  or prototype basis,  in an  effort to perfect the
 optimum control  for  low concentrations of S02  in process off-
 gases.   As  a  result,  it was  concluded  that four scrubbing  systems
 appeared viable  as control  methods for low concentrations  of S02
 based  on transfer  technology or actual  use in  the  copper industry.
 These  systems  included:
     1.   Calcium-based scrubbing systems (lime/limestone)
     2.   Dimethyl aniline (DMA)  scrubbing systems
     3.   Ammonia scrubbing  systems
     4.   Sodium  sulfite - bisulfite scrubbing
     Of the above, only the  calcium-based and  ammonia scrubbing
 systems seem  applicable to  weak stream S02 offgases from rever-
 beratory furnaces.  The DMA  scrubbing  system was considered  viable only
 for  S02 concentrations in the  range of 4 to 10 percent  as  a  re-
 sult of the poor absorption  characteristics of DMA below 2 percent.
 It has  not  been  demonstrated that  the  sodium sulfite -  bisulfite
 scrubbing system can be operated to  control  smelter offgases
 without  excessive  absorbent  sulfate  conversion resulting in  a
 required large purge stream  and, consequently, high costs  because
 of the  relatively  high oxygen and  S03  content  of smelter gases.
     Further review of  the literature indicated the  following sys-
tems have been used to  control S02 in reverberatory  furnace
offgases: 131
     1.  Lime/limestone  scrubbing  system
     2.  Magnesium  oxide concentration system
     3.  Citrate concentration system
     4.  Cominco ammonia scrubbing system
     Coal reduction to  sulfur has  also been demonstrated with
metallurgical  gases.
     The lime/limestone  system resulting  in a  "throwaway" product,
gypsum,  is currently  in  operation  on reverberatory furnaces at the
Onahama  Smelter  in  Japan, as well  as for many  utility offgas
                                  227

-------
streams.  The S02 concentration to this system is currently 2.5
to 2.8 percent.  Lower S02 concentrations will actually allow
this system to become more efficient in terms of sulfur capture.
However, if this lower concentration is obtained by dilution, then
the size of the gas handling equipment must be enlarged.  If the
reduced concentration is obtained by reducing sulfur elimination in
the furnace, then this advantage can be efficiently exploited.
     It is expected that the lime/limestone system can operate
satisfactorily with current reverberatory furnace S02 concentra-
tions resulting from a calcine feed.  Additionally, with a lower
quantity of S02 to be treated, there will be a lower quantity of
solid waste which will minimize handling and disposal.
     The MgO system has also been satisfactorily operated on rever-
beratory offgas at the Onahama Smelter in Japan, as well as  some
prototype work on utilities.  This system produced a concentrated
gas stream of 10 to 13 percent S02, which could be processed di-
rectly in a sulfuric acid plant or blended with those offgases from
multihearth roasters and converters, and subsequently processed in
a sulfuric acid plant.
     The citrate system has been  satisfactorily  operated at the
Boliden AB Ronnskarverken Smelter at Skelleftehamm, Sweden on
metallurgical gases.  The Bureau of Mines has also obtained promis-
ing data on the citrate absorption portion of a larger sulfur pro-
ducing system.  The citrate process can also be used for gases with
varying concentrations of S02» such as tail gases from metallur-
gical and chemical processes as well as from power plant flue
gases.
     The Cominco ammonia system, which produces ammonium sulfate as
well as concentrated S02 offgas, has been  successfully  used  on
reverberatory furnace offgases.  A use must be obtained, however,
for the ammonium sulfate product not currently in great demand.  In
addition, a source of ammonia is required.  It has been reported
that secondary pollution from ammonia plume formation is a serious
                                228

-------
 problem  but  pilot  plant  tests which  are  now  being  followed  by full
 scale  plant  construction indicate  full scale solution  will  be achieved
 in  1981.
     The Smelter Control  Research  Association's  (SCRA)  recent
 studies  using  ammonia  double alkali  system  indicated  some potential
 for application of this  approach.  132  The  major question still
 present  concerns economically obtaining  ammonia, as well  as
 the fact that  this system has not  been used  on  a full-scale
 application.
     With the  Wellman-Lord system, as the  inlet  S02 concentration
 in  the flue  gas decreases, the  required  amount  of  heating steam  and
 cooling  water  increases.  As the concentration  of oxygen  increases,
 the size of  the first  treatment section  and  the  chemical  makeup
 requirements will  increase. Although  it has had extensive  experi-
 ience  at low S02 gas concentrations  in the  utility industry,  it
 has not  been used  on reverberatory furnace  offgas  or  any  other
 metallurgical  gas.
     The coal  reduction  systems used at  Cominco  were  fed  relatively
 high S02  concentrations.   The lower  limit for S02  concentration
 for efficient  reduction  has not  been determined.   Also, the
 production cost of sulfuric acid is  less than that of  sulfur, so
 only in  those  cases where  the acid can not be disposed  would  this
 system seem  attractive.
     The operating experience with the MgO,  lime/limestone, ammonia
and citrate systems on copper smelter reverberatory furnace offgases
indicates that from a technical   standpoint,  they are available to
control S02 emissions.   However, the ammonia  system might pose a
potential adverse ammonia availability problem as  noted above.   Thus,
four FGD systems:   lime/limestone, MgO, ammonia and citrate emerge as
applicable for handling weak stream S(L offgases.
                                 229

-------
                            SECTION 6
                    APPLICATION TO NEW SMELTERS

6.1  PLANT EMISSION DESULFURIZATION SCENARIOS
6.1.1  INTRODUCTION
     A green field smelter using roasters,  or no roasters with a
reverberatory furnace and converters was used as the basic system
to apply S02 control systems along with operating modifications to
provide optimum collection and capture.  A  series of 60 different
scenarios were generated and are summarized in Tables 6-4, 6-5,
and 6-6.
     Oxygen enrichment, leakage control and continuous charging
are typical operating techniques considered.  Flue gas desulfuriza-
tion or neutralization systems were used and blending of weak
and rich SOo streams were incorporated as applicable.

6.1.2  BACKGROUND ASSUMPTIONS
     One technique for upgrading offgases to allow SOo processing
in a sulfuric acid plant is to blend weak streams from the reverber-
atory furnace with stronger streams from other smelting equipment
(Section 3).  An analysis of a typical smelter system that could
be built using multihearth roasters (MHR) or a fluid-bed roaster
(FBR), a reverberatory furnace (RF), and converters follows to
demonstrate the potential of using blending in conjunction with
processing modifications (e.g. oxygen enrichment) and flue gas
desulfurization systems (FGD) for upgrading weak SOo streams.
The final step passes the upgraded, blended gases to a sulfuric
acid plant.
                                230

-------
     For this study a new smelting unit consisting of roasters,
reverberatory furnaces, and converters is considered.  Some of the
techniques discussed in Section 3 are assumed to be inherent in
design and operation of the new smelter.   Practical leakage point
elimination, pressure control, continuous charging, converter
scheduling and advance converter off-gas collection systems are
among the techniques used.  Additionally, converter slag is not
returned to the reverberatory furnace (Appendix D).
     The primary copper smelter under consideration is a new unit
constructed in the Southwestern United States.  The facility consists
of five MHR or one FBR, one RF, and three operating converters with
one additional standby.  A total of 1,400 ton/day  concentrate will
be processed which consists of 28 percent Cu, 30 percent S, 28 per-
cent Fe, 6 percent Si, 3 percent AlpO^, and 5 percent others.  This
unit is considered typical of current smelters found in the South-
western United States.
     Typical  Herreshoff or Wedge multihearth roasters processing
                                                                    133
300 ton/day are used.   Sulfur removal  is  approximately 32.9 percent.
Twenty to 50 percent S0? removal  in MHR has  been  reported using
domestic smelting technology based on  information from seven smel-
     134
ters.      Additionally, volume and S02  concentrations of the roaster
offgas are assumed to  be fairly constant  as  indicated in the litera-
     1 ^
ture.      Thus, a 5 percent SOp at 42,000 scfm offgas is assumed
and is in agreement with a sulfur balance and literature re-
ports.    '137'138  This SOp offgas strength  may be high in comparison
with existing units at some U.S.  smelters because the latter are  old
and contain many leakage points allowing  dilution air input.  Theo-
retical  calculations have indicated values up to  7 percent to be
                      139
feasible (Appendix A).
     Assuming FBR can  be used instead  of  MHR for  processing dirty
feed (Section 3), constant offgas characteristics  are also assumed.
The values to be used  are 9.1  percent  S09 at 23,600 scfm based on
                     37
actual  reported data.
                                 231

-------
     Reverberatory furnaces are typically the same throughout the
copper industry with the major operating difference occurring be-
tween green and calcine charge processing.   For this study,  about
35 ton/day sulfur (8.25 percent) will  be removed in the calcine
charge reverberatory furnace.   Again,  the offgas volume will be
considered constant at about 54,000 scfm.  Although this value
may be low for reverberatory furnace offgases in the U.S., it is
consistent with new units in Japan and corresponds well with Inco
data for a copper smelting handling similar feeds.  The reverbera-
tory S0? offgas concentration fluctuates due to calcine charging.
The actual deviations from an average S02 concentration of 1 per-
cent by volume (for calcine charge) were scaled down and propor-
tioned from data on SO^ versus time for Onahama Smelter (for green
charge) in Japan (Appendix Y).  Figure 6-1  shows gas characteristics
assumed for the reverberatory furnace which are summarized in
Table 6-1.  It should be noted that a continuous side charging
technique for calcine charge can minimize these fluctuations as
noted in Appendix C.

     The converters will  treat matte of 24.5 percent S, 40 percent
Cu, 26 percent Fe, and some Fe-0 .   A  sulfur balance indicates 237
ton/day sulfur (56.43 percent) will  be removed during the various
                      140
slag and copper blows.     Due to the  batch-type operation of a con-
verter cycle,  there are fluctuations in both S0? and volumes of the
offgas which can be seen in Figure 6-2 and  are summarized in Table
6-2.  The average values assumed are 4.5 percent S0? at 82,000 scfm.
These values were based on the initial sulfur balance, and reported
                                                         141
volumes of offgas of 32,000 to 45,000  scfm  per converter.      In
addition, converter programming was also assumed (Appendix H) with
the basic criteria of copper blows on  only one converter at a time.
     Additional assumed cases for the  blending scenarios include
oxygen enrichment of the reverberatory air, the use of a lime or
limestone system for reverberatory offgas neutralization, and the
use of an MgO or citrate enrichment system for upgrading SOo in
the offgases.
                                232

-------
                o
          z:    o
*        Ll-    O
in        o x  •
:-!-_-•
                                  -J-—
                                                ^t
                                          	|_.
                                                                          T-'
                                                                                   ,
                                                                                   rf

                                                                                    §
                                                                                    Vl
                                                                     r
                                              -  __1

.8
                                                                    I
                                                                                 ^O
                                                                                          CO
                                                                                          o
                                                                                                O
                                                                                                n3
                                                                                               C_)


                                                                                                CO


                                                                                                CD
                                                                                           LU   Ol

                                                                                           1—0
                                                                                           •z.   c
                                                                                           H-H   i-
                                                                                           LU
                                                                                                >>



                                                                                                O
                                                                                          s_
                                                                                          
                                             233

-------
Table 6-1.  REVERBERATORY OFFGAS VOLUME AND S02 PROFILES
No Oxygen Enrichment
Time
(min)
7.5
10
20
15
12.5
10
20
17.5
25
20
20
20
15
20
15
20
30
20
10
7.5
15
15
30
20
10
25
so2(%)
0.98
1.03
0.89
1.03
0.92
0.88
1.0
0.94
1.08
0.91
1.05
1.0
1.08
0.88
1.06
1.14
1.01
0.86
1.01
0.92
1.06
1.14
1.0
1.04
0.97
1.09
Volume
( scfm)
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000

Time
(min)
20
25
25
40
30
15
10
45


















so2(%)
0.86
0.98
0.89
1.0
1.06
0.95
0.89
1.05


















Volume
( scfm)
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000
54,000


















                          234

-------
Table 6-1.  REVERBERATORY OFFGAS VOLUME AND S02 PROFILES ('CONCLUDED)
With Op Enrichment
Time
(min)
7.5
10
20
15
12.5
10
20
17.5
25
20
20
20
15
20
15
20
30
20
10
7.5
15
15
30
20
10
25
so2(%)
1.37
1.44
1.25
1.44
1.29
1.23
1.40
1.32
1.51
1.27
1.47
1.40
1.51
1.23
1.48
1.60
2.41
1.20
1.41
1.29
1.48
1.60
1.40
1.46
1.36
1.53
Volume
( scfm)
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800

Time
(min)
20
25
25
40
30
15
10
45


















S02(%)
1.20
1.37
1.25
1.4
1.48
1.33
1.25
1.47


















Volume
( scfm)
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800
41,800


















                                235

-------
       CONVERTER S02 OFFGAS VERSUS TIME
                      Til
                      II
                                            4

   ^ i.
Ji
                                  4tt
                         i
                     TIME (MIN)
               CONVERTER OFFGAS VOLUME VERSUS TIME
0 «•«•*•/*•
                        TIME  (MIN)
   Figure  6-2.   Converter Offgas Characteristics
                           236

-------
Table 6-2.   CONVERTER OFFGAS VOLUME AND S02 PROFILES
Oy and NO Op Enrichment
Time
frnin)
5
15
11
14
40
10
15
9
10
20
5
7
10
5
10
20
29
5
5
4
24
15
25
10
25
15
10
11
14
5
20
S02(X)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.6
5.7
5.4
5.7
5.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.4
5.7
Vol ume
(scfm)
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
40,000
42,000
82,000
122,000
82 ,000
122,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
120,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
122,000
82,000

Time
(min)
10
25
5
16
14
15
9
26
19
5
19
5
5
29
20
10
5














so2(%)
5.4
5.7
5,4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.4
5.7
6.6
5.7














Vol ume
(scfm)
122,000
82,000
122,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
120,000
80 ,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
122,000
82,000
42,000
82,000














                        237

-------
     Oxygen enrichment as used in this study for a calcine-charged
reverberatory furnace results in producing a total air oxygen con-
tent of about 26 percent.  This amount enriches the average SCL in
the offgas to 1.4 percent by volume, while decreasing the volume flow
to 41,800 scfm.  These values are based on actual data from a cal-
                                   142
cine charged reverberatory furnace.     Although these amounts are
low when compared to oxygen enrichment of a green-charged reverberatory
furnace, there is relatively little information as to the extent of
oxygen enrichment for calcine-charged reverberatory furnaces.  Oxy-
gen enrichment up to 60 percent has resulted in S02 offgas strengths
as high as 7.0 percent by volume for green charge reverberatory
         143
furnaces.      For the oxygen  enrichment case,  the multihearth roaster
offgas was taken  as  5 percent SOp  at 42,096 scfm and  the  fluid-bed
roaster offgas as 9.1 percent SOp  at 23,100 scfm to maintain  a sulfur
balance.
     The MgO and citrate systems reportedly maintain S02 offqas
concentrations of 10 and 95 percent, respectively.144,145  (js-jng
these numbers and making a sulfur balance assuming a 90 percent
efficiency of the FGD system, values were obtained for offgas
volume flow rates.  Additionally, it is assumed that no oxygen
will be released with the citrate offgases,while about 8 percent
oxygen will be generated from the calciner of the MgO system  -
comparable to a MHR.
     Oxygen concentrations for the various smelting equipment off-
gases are assumed to be constant.  Values are based on average gas
characteristics from the various smelting equipment.  These  values
provide the basis for determining if the 02 to  SOo ratio is  sufficient
for sulfuric acid production or if dilution air is required  to meet
the acid plant needs in the conversion of SOo to  SO^.
     Values based on the  aforementioned  assumptions  are  summarized  in
Table 6-3 and are used in determining the blended gas characteristics
discussed in the following sections.
                                238

-------
           Table 6-3.  BASIS:  BLENDING SCHEMES
                No 02 Enrichment           CL  Enrichment
MHR         5.0% S02 at 43,000 SCFM   5.0%  S02  at  42,096 SCFM
FBR         9.1% S02 at 23,600 SCFM   9.1%  S02  at  23,100 SCFM
RF (Ave)    1.0% S02 at 54,000 SCFM   1.4%  S02  at  41,800 SCFM
Conv (Ave)  4.5% S02 at 82,000 SCFM   4.5%  S02  at  82,000 SCFM
     MHR            S02 + 02  =  18%;  FBR S02  + 02  =  13.1%
     RF             S02 + 02  =   4%
     Converter      S02 + 02  =  14% (slag below)
                    S02 + 02  =  20% (copper below)
     MgO System     S02 + 02  =  18%
     Citrate System S02       =  95%,  H20 = 5%

Volume and S02 constant off FGD systems  (90 percent efficient)

                No 02 Enrichment           02  Enrichment

MgO        10% S02 at   4,860 SCFM    10% S02 at 5,270 SCFM
Citrate    95% S02 at     510 SCFM    95% S02 at   550 SCFM
                            239

-------
6.1.3  BLENDING SCENARIOS FOR REVERBERATORY FURNACE S02 CONTROL
     Figures 6-3 through 6-9 show the various systems devised for
handling the S02 offgases from the copper smelter under considera-
tion.  As shown, there are two basic cases to be analyzed
(refer to Figure 6-3).  One uses MHR, RF, and converters, while
the other uses FBR, RF, and converters.  To these basic cases,
possible blending scenarios utilizing 02 enrichment, FGD systems,
and acid plants are examined for controlling RF S02 offgases.
     Based on the aforementioned blending scenarios and the
assumptions  presented in Section 6.1.2, the various blended  gas
characteristics were calculated  over 11 hours -  one converter
cycle (see Appendix Y)-   These calculations reveal  that the  02
to SOo ratios are sufficient to  preclude any dilution air addition
at the acid  plants.  Also, the SOo concentrations are high enough
(greater than 4.5 percent) in all  but four cases (1) MHR + Conv.
+ RF (2) same except RF 02 enrichment (3) FBR +  Conv. + RF and
(4) same except RF 02 enrichment to allow processing in a double
contact sulfuric acid plant.   The volume and S02 concentrations
fluctuate mainly because of the  fluctuating converter offgas
influence.
     Table 6-4 lists the general  characteristics to be considered
in designing systems for treating RF offgases in FGD systems prior
to blending.  The blending scenarios as presented include design
characteristics for FGD systems  and acid plants  - maximum volumes
and average S02 concentrations.   Minimum and average gas charac-
teristics are included to aid the designer in determining if any
additional process equipment will  be needed to accommodate large
fluctuations.
     Scenarios Nos. 17 and 18 in Table 6-4 are for new smelters
operating under the existing NSPS excluding RF offgases from any
control and serve as a model case for comparing those blending
scenarios which have RF offgas control. They assume that "dirty

                                240

-------
Figure 6-3.   Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter
             Offgases
Figure 6-4.  Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter
             Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment
                       241

-------
Figure 6-5.   Flowsheet for Blending  Copper Smelter
             Offgases Using Nonregenerative FGD Systems
Figure 6-6.  Flowsheet for Blending Copper Smelter
             Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment and
             Nonregenerative FGD Systems
                     242

-------
    CASE 4 t 5 - NHR

    CASE 12 » 13 - FBR
Figure  6-7.   Flowsheet for Blending  Schemes Using
              Regenerative FGD Systems
CASE 7 1 8 - HHR

CASE 15 i 16 - F8R
 Figure 6-8.   Flowsheet for  Blending Copper Smelter
              Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment and
              Regenerative FGD  Systems
                         243

-------
      BASE CASE 17 - MHR

      BASE CASE 18 - FBR
Figure 6-9.   Flowsheet for Handling Copper Smelter S02 Offgases  Dictated
                 by the New Source Perforfonuance Standards
                                    244

-------
o:
LU
i—  oo
_i  s
LU  LU
s:  r-
oo  oo
    >-
ce.  oo
LU
Q-  Q
D.  CJ3
O  LL.
O
    O
3  I—
LU



"*£
s:  o
o  —
o;
u_  oo
    LU
oo  oo
•z.  <
O  C3
i—i
00  LU
oo  o

Si
LU  o:
    Z3
 CMLU
O
00  >-
    o;

O  LU
O  CtL

C£  LU
O  r-
u_  
_J  i—
03
    CD
    •z.
  .  i—i
*d-  oo
 i  oo

3
CM
O
(/» -Q
U 4->
C tJ
4) i—
°-
•o
•M c
1°"
s



00~
s2
C Cv
o t-
Atmo sphere
fMax.
1 CTi OJ
= e >
- -g 4J
n 3 -i-
- 
en

c
*- '
v^-»
u
E
u.
0
VI
trt
1
O
c
in CMCMCM'— *~! "~ r-. CM mm
CM CO OOOO ^^vOCM ChO>



• • 222" 5 - • • : s
[
^-^- cocMCTtf* t— co r^> m e\jm
ooo^^t^ oo
*••*•••* •*
m m m ^- 5 5 mm
r- CO -—CO f— 00 >O CM tO CM \O (M -- CO ^00
-^ -"^ "^ ^c: ^^ -c. ^^ '"^
§§ §1 ll 11 11 11 ii if
SS SS SS 55 55 55 SS SS
in co ^DcoO—

§§ si §1 II ss si 11 si II II !§ 11
cnrxo mm mm en r-. mm VCM 01 r* «• CM CT» r^. ««• unm o op
•— m OCM vo oo tc co vo co ys co toco vo co en.— co ci «r « m 3

CM CM CM CM CM
O O O O«~^ O™
QcSee u.—» +J-*-* Q£'s oer-ii__ju>So£ aS ^.*~"
+ Q. +< ^^C •*•>! •*• • — > f O»+-i-oE+CO OJ+S
 * o co a* -"_j +z uo •** **B •*•»
. -^ . ^.f-, .4$ • -*J •» «T *» X» -0 .-^ -Wt
cu CLAC ecu c _cn CL. c T — > c -^ cm
3* 8-2 SJ 3f 3^ SJLl 3l S-L £« 3- 3 S So
ii IsS ll is. i^ ill ll ii sH ill it gt
                                               245

-------
   Q
   UJ



Ul _l
(— o
_J Z
Ul O




C£. 00
I 11 ^
Q. UJ
O- I—
O oo
o >-
   oo
3
I i I Q
Z. C3
u.  >-
    _1
oo  z
oo  oo
OO  UJ
>-H  00
S  <
UJ  ID

 OJ UJ
O  O
oo  <;
    •z.
C£3  Qi
o Q:
a; o
o a:
 z.
 i — ' — <
 -Q OO
  (O OO
 1— UJ
    o
    o
    Q;
    a.
Us
Is3
CM 
Uncontrolled
so2
Emissions
o
CM •-
O 
3
CM
0
wo ^
1) i—
U O Q.
0}
O_
•o
(O
'



O CN
ss
,eS
O t-
l_
CO
JE
O 0. >
wp
Emissions
Including
3
f £*f
(U u
fi/i
££
U. C
U 4->
< C >
01
o>
1
eT
X C
•
i
^'
«
I
X
4j




> CM
; o
'I
!"CM
- O
J l/l
*A
10.
:£•
J (/>
O
It
: O
CM
O
Z
U-
wo
X
u.
CJ
wo
„&
• n3
1^
:£
u
if
-N*
J U-
= 
C -f-
— c
0
tn in in in h«. r*.
S ?> S r*> O O
o o o o c7t cn
CM CM CM CM 00 00
1 1
vo r-. r-*. r^-
CM i— m CM 00 CM
CM CM CM CM ro CM
• 1 1
§0 O O
o o o
00 00 00
• • - * 1 1
S 5 5 5
i* «O
^ CO lOCM lOCM *O CM
OO OO OO OO
OO OO OO OO
10 •— ro co r*. fo
in in to m ^ in
m *O £. ^iS. ^S «£.
O O O O O 0
i — o r*. in O c5
r- i— m vo o «o
10 in o in in in
O O t— O CM O
oo oo oo oo oo oo
•— ^- OO ^r-*. LTtin OO OO
|S 53 SS S3 S3 S3
CM (NJ O> CJt
CM O O, — , 1C 1C
O 	 — > - + CT> + ••- UJ Ul
— . .-_J X O --^ •-«^
>a =;* >k >* >?- ;,-
IS sl| si si s^i I"?
•>- ^4-> f ^ *O(O *OIQ
+ CJ +(Jtf) +O +0 +I.TI + L. V
. •i-O) •*- T- 4-> C WC
Q^A QCL.E O£L. QCL. QCCIQ QCC r^ co



•M

•i- C
10
ai "a.
t/i
w> -o
0) -r-

• o
0) -M S
Ul C Q-
4- U)
o -o 10
••- CT
T3 O <*-
0) (0 t-
T3 O
C O
oj M- -a
r- S- 01
J3 3 -a
M- C
^- r— O)
i— 3 ^~
«I U) CO
10 -Q
                                       246

-------
feeds" can be processed in MHR as well  as FBR because the latter
are currently being used for some impurity combinations, Reference
146.
     The maximum scfm to the acid plant, i.e., design criteria,
for the various scenarios indicate that the acid plant design
capacities will be similar for RF control via FGD systems and the
model case.  For scenarios Nos. 1, 2, 9, and 10, the acid plant
design capacities are increased by the volume of gas off the RF;
however, for these cases, single contact acid plants are required
due to the S02 concentration - below 4.5 percent.

     Gas characteristics to the FGD systems vary according to the
use or nonuse of oxygen enrichment in the RF.  The volumes to be
handled by the FGD systems are 54,000 and 41,800 scfm  for no oxygen
enrichment and oxygen enrichment, respectively.

     In addition, Table 6-4 lists the S02 control capabilities of
the various scenarios.  For those cases using FGD systems on RF
offgases prior to blending, the control efficiencies are approx-
imately 95 percent.  Comparing this with the control realized under
the NSPS, there is about an additional  7 percent S02 capture.  For
the cases where the RF offgases are merely blended and then sent
to a single contact sulfuric acid plant, only a slight increase in
S02 control is realized.
     The major factor influencing total S02 control  efficiency is
whether the blended gases are processed in a double contact or
single contact sulfur acid plant.  As noted in Section 4» double
contact acid plants release about 650 ppm SO- and single contact
acid plants release about 2,600 ppm to the atmosphere.  This
indicates that single contact acid plants release about four times
more S02 emissions as double contact acid plants.
     Assumptions for Table 6-4 are summarized in Appendix Y,
                                247

-------
     In addition to calcine charge reverberatory furnace S0? control,
the blending potential for green charged reverberatory furnaces should
be addressed briefly.   Although it is unlikely that future green charge
reverberatory smelting facilities will be constructed in the future
due to feed considerations, several existing facilities employ such
smelting practices and as such any blending potential deserves dis-
cussion.
     For the above case, one reverberatory furnace and four converters
(three operating and one on standby) are considered to represent the
new smelting facility.  Offgas characteristics from the reverberatory
furnace are assumed to be identical to those at the Onahama smelter
in Japan - 55,000 scfm with 2.5 percent S02-  The converter offgas
characteristics are the same as for the calcine charge reverberatory
furnace situation.

     Table 6-5 lists the general characteristics to be considered in
designing systems for total S02 control.  Case A represents blending
reverb and converter offgases and direct processing in an acid plant.
For this case, the blended offgases are too low in SOo for direct
processing in a double contact sulfuric acid plant and, as such,
would require processing in a single contact acid plant.
     Case B neutralizes reverb gases with a lime/limestone system
and treats converter gases in an acid plant.  Cases C and D use
either the MgO or Citrate regenerative systems to concentrate the
reverb gases, then blend with the converter gases and treat this
blend in a sulfuric acid plant.  These cases reduce the offgas volume
to the acid plant but would require additional expenditures for the
FGD system.  For a comprehensive assessment of any blending feasibility,
an economic evaluation is required.  The reduction in acid plant
handling capacity could offset the costs associated with the FGD
system and provide economic incentives.  This aspect requires
further evaluation for economic implications.
                                 248

-------
CJ3
o
 CM O
O   
4-> •<•
o E
t- u
Uncontrolled
S02
Emissions
en
~S
C 1/1
t/1 t/1
i
LU
|
£
Q
13
O
U

c  C
0;^
|°-
»•

O C\
•D ft O
4> 00 (-0
l/> 1
 3 •-
tf) r— C
•r- O I
ECU.
UJ *- 1
0
o •*•
u. E <*•
0) u.
4J
E 1/1
O X a-
I- l/) C
Li_ O
•o
«t c >
E.= i
o a. —
LL.
0)
1
OJ
>
«c

II
X C
£§

a;
>
«t
x 5
£ J
Average
i I
E E
x c
g £

•M
3
O
C
C«J
• o
e (/i
•i
'Q_
t—
CM
O
l/l
1
0
no.
h-
CM
J?
O
Q.
3 1—
.?
« LO
!i
- cx
1—
r
>5
Z
U-
O
0)
CM
O
*s
=:
1/1
0)
C"
z
c
z_
z
0
l/>
E
o
l/l
Blending Conditions
VO CSI i— ••-
^- m m ir>
ro m «j- LO
10 o ^ ^
*s- * •» «*
o o o o
CM CM OJ CM
ii — r^ r-~
if) U3
m oc ^o r^.
ID CM f» CO
CM
t in ui ID
f CM CM CM
s s s
I C^ O O
i tr> ir) ID
ui m ir>
If) If) If) If) If) Uf)
I 00 ,— 00 ^ CC ^
1 CM CM CM CM CM CM
8O O O O O
O O 0 O O
I O O O O O O
i in ifi if) in if) if)
LD LT) If) LT) If) Lf)
CM CM
r*> LD CM ey>
f*^ *f in m
*— -— co'S' co oc"
\oo^ ^-o OOCM *r^
^•CM l/l^- Ifllf) VOVO
s s § s
O O f*l r*l
r-^ CM ^- m
CO CO C^ 00
o o o o o o o
O O O •— ^- CJi OJ
I*-. CM O VO O ro f—
r»- csj ^ fi LO CM ^~
b
A. RF + Conv SC/SA Acid Plant
B. [RF (Lime/Limestone)]:
Conv
C. [RF MgO] + Conv
D. (RF Citrate) + Conv
                                                          o
                                                          to

                                                          E
                                                          O
                                                          o
                                                          o
                                                          -o
                                                          to

                                                          E
•o
 CU
 to
 (SI

 o
 o

 Q.

 CU
                                                          -o
                                                          O)
                                                          o
                                                          T3
                                                          E
                                                          CU
                                                          to
 cu
JC

 o

 to

 CU
                                                          to
                                                          CU
                                                          ts>
                                                          M-  Q.
                                                          T3  (J
                                                          O)  10
                                                          T3
                                                          E  U
                                                          CU •!-


                                                          S  3
                                                                   E
                                                                   ID
                                                                   Q.

                                                                  T3
                                                                   U
                                                                   10
                                                                   u
                                                                   S-
                                                                   3
                                                                   U
                                                                   fO
                                                                   o
                                                                   o
                                                                   a;
                                                                   en
                                                                   E
                                                                   to
        "O
         QJ
         to
         
-------
6.1.4  OTHER BLENDING CONSIDERATIONS
      This section will  examine blending scenarios which will  enrich
the S02 concentrations of the gases sent to the acid plant as  well  as
decrease the volumes to be handled by such systems.  The strategy
used will entail  processing different combinations of smelting equipment
offgases, other than only the RF,  in FGD systems prior to blending
in hopes of finding an economic optimization.   The FGD systems
applicable to such an approach include only the MgO and citrate
since these systems not only reduce the offgases but also concen-
trate the resulting offgas SOp.  Figures 6-10 through 6-19 show
these various systems devised to handle offgases from the copper
smelter assumed for this study.
     The lime or limestone FGD systems are excluded since their
application for processing stronger SOp concentrations may be
limited both economically and physically (Section 5.2).  The scenarios,
as discussed herein, typically will process offgases from MHR, FBR,
or converter gases along with or without those of the RF.  Thus,
these processed gases will have higher SOp concentrations due  to
the assumed S02 concentrations from these process equipments.
     Table 6-6 is similar to Table 6-4 and considers the charac-
teristics of the blended systems as indicated.  All assumptions
considered for Table 6-4 are applicable here (see Appendix Y).
     Table 6-6 indicates that the design capacity for the acid
plants  (based on maximum volume flow) will change considerably
from the base cases, depending on the scenario.  Reductions
in volume achieved are as much as 79 percent (i.e., case No. 50);
however, the Op/SOp ratios of the resulting blended gases may not
be sufficient for conversion of SOp to S03 (refer to Section 4).
     Table 6-7 lists the 02/S02 ratios for those scenarios presented
in Table 6-6.  As shown, many of these ratios fall below the minimal
1.2 and, therefore, would require additional oxygen for proper
conversion.  Case Nos. 19, 23, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39,
40, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 53, 55, 56, 57, and 58 are all

                                 250

-------
   CASE 19 \ 27 - MHR

   CASE 35 I 43 - FBR
 Figure 6-10.   Flowsheet for Blending  Schemes Using
                Regenerative FGD  Systems
CASE 23 i 31 - MHR

CASE 39 I 47 - FBR
   Figure 6-11.  Flowsheet  for Blending Copper Smelter
                 Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment  and
                 Regenerative  FGD Systems
                        251

-------
   CASE 20 I 30 - MHR

   CASE 36 > 46 - FBR
Figure 6-12.
               Flowsheet  for Blending Schemes  Using
               Regenerative FGD Systems
CASE 24 t 34 - HHR

CASE «0 i 50 - FBR
  Figure  6-13.
                Flowsheet  for Blending Copper  Smelter
                Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment  and
                Regenerative FGD Systems
                        252

-------
  Figure 6-14.
Flowsheet for Blending Schemes  Using
Regenerative FGD Systems
CASE 25 I 33 - MHR

CASE 41 S 49 - FBR
  Figure 6-15.
Flowsheet for  Blending  Copper Smelter
Offgases Using Oxygen  Enrichment and
Regenerative FGD  Systems
                          253

-------
  CASE 22 t 28 - MHR

  CASE 38 1 44 - FBR
Figure 6-16.   Flowsheet for Blending Schemes Using
               Regenerative FGD Systems
\F.M.
/""I'M W* — ***** S. ^ i f|
COWL. — *• ^u^u^ ~* M/

Yfil

E5P
SE 26 > 32 - MHP
SE 42 t 48 - F3R p>

, '
i


UVHCMMOn

w


am
•
WWfl

,
WOT
ESP


1 — 3. — 1 * A050U
C/7WWJ *' 1 1
»

r
.— »

.37WH




COvV
i

C.A


wor
ESP



8.5.
• AT
A. C.

, ACID
fLAHT

                (STACK)
Figure  6-17.
Flowsheet for Blending  Copper Smelter
Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment and
Regenerative FGD Systems
                       254

-------
                !£&*;
COWT _»"*•***• _.. iy/
WJIVA,. * iv«ive "'
i
W.

E5P
CASE 51 i 52 - HHR
CASE 55 S 56 - FBR
	 j— i

— «
/^v£ea
1
WHB.
|
-J«T-
£5P


Eo=jSS
jc^euz *> — j — 1
— »

— »
COW?
1

CD.
\

HOT
ESP


lyJWHt
1
-•

8.5.
^ A f
^ A. C.

, ACIO
PLAHT

 Figure 6-18.  Flowsheet  for  Blending  Schemes Using
               Regenerative FGD  Systems
CASE S3 S 54 - MHR

CASE 57 t 58 - FBR
 Figure 6-19.
Flowsheet for Blending Copper  Smelter
Offgases Using Oxygen Enrichment  and
Regenerative FGD Systems
                     255

-------
co
3 Z
Z t-H
I—
-«
o: a. LU
0 I—
U_ CD
O Z
co o i— i
O «* 1—
1 — 1 * 	 1
ry i — LU
 O
,- oS
3 |
•o
OJ
£o~-2
O -r-
Emissions
From FGD
so2
Emissions
i
•4-*

l/l
O
c:
o
+j
u
4->
t.
a>
U
 X
•M$ C
C id
I- 4->
£
•o
U
«r
>o
!c
"3
^

3 CM
ss
=s .
o t-
£
a. x <
(/> «
0.0,.

(J 3
it
•M LU
V}
>>
O
ON
•4-J
C X
a. -*^-
£

i~
QJ
>
<:


ET
X C
?f


OP
>

«t
Maximum
(Minimum)
0
c
•o
c
QJ
oc
J

3
a
a.


a
i.
CM
3
i/)
Q
Q.
-
o4
to
i.
h-
CM
S

X
U
(/)
CM
O
LO
*<
JE;
u

at
o>
2
_^^
E
C_J
L/)
Z
li_
CJ
l/l
o
+J
c
o
— »«o »— o m r^ (*•> •—
r^CD CMOr^ O CM O eg •— CM O co ^~
& a* encnao o^ cr> ovoocneyiCTNco cr»

Sr^ »jo o ^- m vo e7*oui^-coco ^i
oo Scoo oo ^o r-.Of-mr^°N r-

So; oio;^ <^ w o^wo^o^cj;^ ^

,_. ^. m «tf- ^ r^ rx ^ ^ r^-Lnr^^-^^1 f^
r>-in ro«*cc to m «*r-*^-o->uir^ •*
,— O mOesi O> rn cscMvoroeMCM ID
^- *t \oirir-»i — vo ur>

§o o o *o o *o jooooo^c o
o oow o 01 oooooo^ o
o ooo oo oo oooooo o
lt> \O I^.CM^- CO CO CMinCMt^iD^f CM
CMCO OAOOCM CNJ CO COCMOOCTirnvM CO
r-^ 0*0^ ino Or- ror-. »— i— CNJ inoo^oo-—
£ OCM oort ^-O mm «tf-in co^- ^-o coin «-o oor-~ OCM coin - in ^^SS^^S 2
^cco r«-^or- ro r-. r— r*. cs% CM vo «3- co
IA r-t in ^ »XS r«- m moiunr-^CMfM vo
o^co t— •— OOCM vo«r r^.o <-in OOCM COCM CMP- CMCM Or— COCM r^-r^. vo*±
i^i 9 oovo vo^o inco f-.m co vo vo vo vo^ mv.o co^~ P^.CT» r^.co vooo crt^r
gg 22S C 2 SSS5BS £
ino CMCMCT> in CM f— to *± m o CM m
* » •,«•> " » *•.«•••«• «
ve.— vooro O »O r-^OiO^-r-^r-* £.
oco omcr» co o »— moco^rf co
CMO CMO OO CMO mm r-O CMOO COvo com i— vo vo^- ^-vo uoo I^CM
Sm mco onro ONO co«a- Or- votn cocn r^. un ^-r— covo CM«a- ro«— <*•>•—
r». COLO com CM«* o«— «J-o cft^- r-CM CMUT* ts*in» l/1^, ^^ »• "~1 .
cMr-T fTt-^" vom vo»— om r-»r- voco coco cMr^ coco CSJCM CTI^T ouo °l£?
coco ovo ^-vo in*— cMr-. ovo ^-vo ^-ON voi/i OCTI CM^- ^-«a- in^r crioo
xfe +m |> x x+ |, x_ +u_ + a _ fe si-
*CTC/1 (/? t/l'trt 'a) ^i00-" •" 5 X -"2 O ^O^ -^ £ "- % CD «- »Z ZOL. C — "Z *-— O SE •— ' 0V to i-*J 0-M t_)CJ>E cjuj
A^1 -&1 'i.10 AK 4^£ £A+ £A+ 4^ *G fu. ^S *£ f*u f .v,
'? f" /k° Ti 'A ~ ^1 -J^i I" '* 1= t- I- l!'i l£
>" t>I TA >+ >'S SfS Si-S i* >' »+ ti ii >|- >-
ct^ 'cZ 4 = = STj? SI Si SI Si Si S,7o~ S +
(jio r-CMPO •* Lf) VOh^COCT»O<— CM
,— CM CMCMfM CM CM CMCMCMCsjmro fO
256

-------
   OO

3 Z
LJ O
O CQ
Ss:
u. o

oo

o ^
I—I I—I "—.
OO ryf Q
OO UJ UJ
I—l Q ^
2:1-1 -z.
UJ OO i—<
   2: h-
 CMO Z
OOO
OO    O
   UJ	
CD I—
 _j I— oo
 _i ^ <
 O UJ CJ3
 o: o u.
 i— z u_
 z o o
 o o
 O  I  I—
    Q -Z.
 cc a. uj
 o i— s
 U_    D-
    O 1-1
 oo o ^
 o «* o-
 i— I   » UJ

 ea: "~" C3
 Z CD "Z.
 C/0 OO _ I
    00 UJ
 CD uj s;
 z: o oo
 1-1 O
 Q Qi _J
 Z Q -- 1
  CQ UJ U.
     I— O
  o oo
  Q Q.
  Q Q-
  < O
     CJ
  UD


   (1)


  S
   (O
4-> •— t


s- c  T:
C '1-
O (.
O f
to  E

i E
UJ U
*


O
CD
S
U
irt
U

U
|Q
JE


O
CM
O

u o CL.

•o
u

C
8 =







3 CM
*• o
0 i/l

O
c a.
OP-
e
-C

(/I 


o :




&£

>>
CO S4
i;
4->
C >
Ji





i.
a*
<£


j~.
E E
E E
X C
""




1
X



<

E
X
-





4->


C

CM

CO
-0
0.
p-

••— *
CM
0


a.



^_^
rT

O
O.

CM
C O
LO

a.
H-
CM
O
CO


x;
u.
to
sf
^


u.
CJ


J CJ)

5 c
-£
u
7>^
> CO

z
5 U.
I <_>
— CO

o> c
C O
Q 4->
v -o
— c
U 0
0

m 10 ^-tn o vovo CM o ps.^-^moo


a, » eo* a^ 0,00 <*

r^ r-. CMOO oo com ro oo coro^-e^^

S S Ooo S f**O CO ^» r^Or^^Of**-



ps. P^ 00 0 00 0 0 00000
a^ o^ oo o oo o o ooopo






ID 01 r-^- if) ^s-in e^ in *r •— «y in «*

m S rCS S £S S n ^r^^rmin

*t T— i— *t n *fO *r ro ^-CMO^-m
O ^ i— f-^ csj t— o rv CM omr^-ocsi


s: 5 s^ » mS 5 - ^s^i?^


i I § § 1 i § I i § § 1 § 1
**> m in to r-T CMUI en •* S^S&^iS
CO CM OfO r>. 000 £J «3 COOOOr^M
r— " mr*. o d (?i O ^DP-» a»p-» POP*. r-» i— —, °* ^>^S^?lS
rn^ Sin oooOco inm ^a-oey*co *3-m CMO ^ooco^Oi^rooeM
mco ^-CM \Oin ^-CM rof> m^- min -SI-CM *^- m^- >oin LTIO- rom ^-CM
— ,_, — — ^_, — *_. ^—

si if 1§ if §1 §1 If 11 ii §§ §§ §§ i| II
m PO ror-^ inrovO"* r^P*- CMOtfifo ro^- ^T'J ^SiS^^StiE^fSSi
coco 1000 «-\o rs.cn I-.P-. CM^- ^ \o ^oco tnio cs*^- ^-^D CM<- r^r* r^trt

*-* *-" ^-^— ^-- «— ^- -— *—
PO O VP-. in CSIP-S «> m ^IT^jrilri
(M CT> v\O i*- *j-f— >0 r*. l~^^'~;^.

SS SS SR SS SS S? £2 SE 2S 5° E£ S? SS S£
^£ tS "S "2. "S ^^ "" *£ "iS. ^S "~ °S ^S SS
S 1 S 5 ? 5 § 5 2 1 § § S S
SVD iO»— ID OCO *— "^ ^^dlS^J^
5f 0*0 0 ^cr. «5 0 cnincOQOCM
1— 1— i— •—

coST ^^ OGO'CSJO' O^OT" OToLr-aT ^^" COM' CMO vo o j- « 5£[£^ ^^
§S S§ SK 5? SS S§ 5^ 55 S3 2S RS S= ES SS
a"s" s's" S'B" ss" 52" ss §s §ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
— — - — — — — • — — ~_^- — —
^ If f: if i~ ! f-i- ^4 ^| ^ 1 i 1 1
£^> (O*^ tOWl 4JU1 4->(/l CO I^W£ PJ11- pX +§ ?4. ? ^?c £-h
U<— ' 0 4-> ft I 0 00 >,0 >>tO 0 0 CO U U 0 + U CD 00 4J 4J 4J 0 *-
•F-ft)O'^*EZ O* I/I O* tO CT> CTl -^ •*" tJ •"- ^ li- "' ^ OjJ O i- C_34->
ti5'S t I'a I* ?T f f > T£ T?^~ "tss, "^s> T ~ T-- T" i" T-,
itl p il lis 11? j; lit m if? k j! i« I! il

o-) m mro ro mt'o «r T •O-^-ST ^ 	
                                                            257

-------
   oo
3 Z
LiJ O
O CQ

LL. O

CO

O Z.
I—I I—< -—•
co a: o
co LU LU


LU co i—<
   •z. i—
 CNJO 'Z.
O C_> O
CO     O
    LU-—
03  h-
"Z. 
(_)   I I—
    a -s^.
 rv* Q_ 111
o i— s:
 LU    a.
    O >-"
 CO O ZD
 O ** cr
 i—I   •> LU
 a: ^
 •a;    o

 LU "Z. i—i
 o I-H i—
 co co —i
    co LU

 z o co
 M O
 ca Q;	i
 •Z. Q	1
 LU    o:
 _i a;
 co LU LL.
    I— O

 <; LU
 z s:
 o co
  Q Q.
  a D.
  <: o
     o
  10
   i
  10

  (U

c Q -o «
OJ t- 4) C
(J 4-» trt
i- C IO
(U O CO
0_<_J


8 §
.;: c
i— VI 4-
5 £
o E
h- LU
 K 5


UJ
(/I "C
O L
CM ••- <
irt 1/1 E
tu u
1


§
s

I-
1


0™
00 .^
*£ **"*


OJ


0 •*•>
tj
Is
o









3 CM
3 (/>
1
O
§0.
1-


tt*
ex >

2 *;
«
CT* QJ
C >
•5 *-
3 •«-
7,2
C U.
™
£«*•
0) V
+J U.
X

c
cr

c >




en
o>


E^
K C


<
<


5





1

z*;


a






|



o
to
o
Q-
t-
CM
O
t/1
ro
o_
t—
CM
O
to
o

t-


0^
*?
a.
i—
CM
O
to

**
z
u.
VI
CM
O

Z
u_
o
t/1
„&
C i-


IT
=s

5 tj
f
z
iu.


-"io

to
Cf> C
c o
O *->
a; -o
— c
D O
(_>


SOr-cMo'cOOOO '"cOO'iS


i^ m a* « N « •- lommvo


crr-.icr^or-crt r^cfvr^cn

O000^r~h- r-000
CM (VJ C«J CSJ t— *— >— t— CXJCSJCSJ

in «• in ot vo « w mvoo>o

SSSSi-^SS SSSSS




cvju,«-ino>mc, « « n 0
v in 0 N oo « in oIoda^CT,

^ ^' in "O *o m in ^~
tn m i— «*• m in co co O o m

ui«s-*rmrorom co^^r^s-
oooo^rotc untnco^o
,— ocnco^co^ C^CM^O
OCO^OCMLOO^- CftPOCOCM
a»r^" "~*r^^' r>rT rs.co' rv.co ui in coco coco oo
mm m^ ^2: ^^i ^^2. *C. ^C *^2. *2- *S S
oo oo oo oo y> ud incr> mo IDCM ^vo o in CMO
U-»PO CMOV^- f>i — i— ro CMO VOCJ* COiO O**CM CMO roco
— — ^— '^*— ^- *-* ^ ^ *-*
*OCOCOf— C3OOO
CMCOr^»-COCOCO COCOCOCO

*-*. f-^ r— , f— . *— » *— H ^— * •"-«• .^^ *— * ^~"
cril? CMO CMCM coai oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
loao CMior^CT COLO co oo coco ao co coco coco coco coco
sls2s§i R§SS
r^. oo *Y r^ CM ^ (si inro m PO


r^o Sr^cM^o f^-cn oo roco ^-r— LO co ind CMin mcM
oco i — ^""^i"* CT»O roo CTitsj vco iin f> «*"O ro^ o^—
*•! .AC* ••» - » •• »» •» •>* *B **
S-o- i-v«3 CM** CMCSJ o^- — *r o<* ^"* o^- — o- o^-
^^, ^^, +^, ^_^ ^^, ^^- ^_*. -^-- *_•• *_^ ^-«
L_ A -f -0 C C
^-^ ^7 ^ DC 'f*-*^ Q£. OJCM-O O>OJ tJ +J1O
O>4-> • "— 4J 08 E -CO)
*j ^^, — . *Jc d)Li_. *ja^Li_ «e oe-ona • — • c >cow B "*S c E -^
.,- t. E •*- o •*- v *-) -f- •«-rQ? 01 z co (_> -D s_ - — -o a> z to ••- ~o
i'.'^'o <»'-' c«+ ^AC^O oTSo c/-oo cc^o^ oTco ocmo QC-D-M cec.0)
TO-r- JU- llll-,— * »UjE Z *J IC-U X. JUJ4J CO *J 000)10 COUJf-
1 4 c K o^ 5 I  > i-- T i- > - — - T c > a) c>ai c-i-r- C"— 'ii c>at cr u c— Z
coccMcc£ T-*-* ^ f a> c i- DCS- a* i_ co o ai i- a* c i- a> TJ *> *o
OCOO OCQ U-I— OlJ_] »— O*J r-O-w •— C O> i— U. +J ^-O+J • — CO i-U.CC

r^ CO CT> O •— CM CO ^j-unwDf^
^j- ^ ^ in m in un in in ur> in
                                                         258

-------
   oo
3 -Zi
LJ O
O CQ

CC-SL
LuO
   O
       o
 (/)UJ LU
 i-HQ =3
 •SL^-Z.
 LU{/) i— I
    z: h-
 (MO ^
 o o o
 oo    o
    1 1 \ ^ __ '
 C5 1—
 z <: oo
 t-i C£ LU
 _J I— 00
 _J Z -, O
 o o: _j
 Z Q -- 1
 LU     <£.
 _j o;
 CQ LU LL.
    I— O
 _1 _1
 e£ LU
 z s:
 O oo
  i— I LU
  a a.
  a a.
  ID
   I
   0)
   (O
4J i— O CM
C O ~O ^O
U t. Ol COCO
? C* * o
u o eo co.
b. O Of-
Ol
CM I/I L.
O C O»
OO O -C '
•,- O O.X

° LU «:
2
i— C C >
O CM O T- •«-
L. 0 - T) 4-)
-> OO W) 3-*-
5 ••- *o :
u E cu-
C UJ i-t
cS ««-
O U- E •«-
CM -f- OJ LU

4-1
3
c

—

CM
o
1
a.
t—
CM
o
CO
D tfl +^ <
co wi E v> O
•t- o x»* a.
wut^cn
c
O U •*-> • CM
CM ••- «S C X O
3 V» <0 fC

I
W)

CO
o
o
LL.
s
u
VI

O)

 ID
X 3 C

I-.
O) O
> CO


I'
X
£













z:
I-
E"
— to
tA


C O
f -t-

C i-
a> x>
-— c
CO O


« CO en
i-^ r-^ r-
en co co

en en «
S | 5




O •— «•*
M CO OO



1 1
5

^r co CM
en co CM

i i


o

*"2. i •
S
f_ "^
• • i t
in ^>




$ro
CO f**


o vo in
CO ^ in
O O co in O CO
CO CO "^ *, *°i2.
CO 00
S 0 ^O
in in in
I-* CM O


f^.^ O O^ O O
*o »— o o o o
r— f- o o LD to
c\j en in ro in co
— • — • >—
£ ai t- J^
> -i- -O * "O U- "O
C i. OJ S- LL. C C£ C
O C  QC IT) *O
ecu •- aj or) >cy(/i
• CNJ > i— > *—
oiO'OO c f— cri C^CT>
ca— c 4J ooc ooc
c *^ n o ~*~ o •*—
aj -o c u ceux ce u x
i— C O) 4J XCLU CQ C UJ
co «j E uo !:=>— U-ZD —
Sen o
in vo
c
o
u
o
T3

IO

C


•o

in

01
o

S
a.


e
m
TJ
 at
 IO
 u
       a.

      •o
 o

 in

 ai

"c
       o
       10
       o
       L
       o
       (O

       c
       o
       o
 in    i—
>*- a.

 O T3

T3 U
 ai 10
•a
 c u
 01 -i-

IJD 3
                                                                      Ol
                                                                      u

                                                                      £
                                                                      a.
                                                                      01
                                                                      tn
                                                                      10
                                                                      en
                                                                     T3
                                                                      Ol
                                                                     •o
                                                                   i   03
                                                                    JD
                                  259

-------
Table 6-7.   OXYGEN TO SULFUR DIOXIDE  (02/S02) RATIO
 FOR  ADDITIONAL SCENARIOS AS PRESENTED IN TABLE 6.5
Blending Scenario
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
02/S02 Ratio3
2.74
2.63
2.71
2.57
2.50
2.71
2.54
2.49
2.19
1.92
1.92
1.83
1.77
1.93
1.83
1.77
2.99
2.19
1.00
1.45
2.00
1.64
0.91
1.44
2.00
1.53
0.28
1.20
1.68
>1.20b
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
<1.20C


















X



X



X


   Calculated based on average gas characteristics to acid plant
   Desired minimum ratio for processing in a double contact sulfuric
   acid plant
  Considered too low for processing in a double contact sulfuric
   acid plant
                            260

-------
       Table  6-7.  OXYGEN TO SULFUR DIOXIDE (02/S02) RATIO
FOR ADDITIONAL SCENARIOS AS PRESENTED IN  TABLE 6-5 (CONCLUDED)
Blending Scenario
Number
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
02/S02 Ratio3
0.94
0.18
1.09
1.68
0.92
1.00
0.67
2.00
0.87
0.91
0.67
2.00
0.78
0.280
0.44
1.68
0.16
0.19
0.33
1.68
0.16
1.07
1.16
1.09
1.21
1.00
0.96
1.02
1.00
>1.20b



X



X



X



X



X




X




<1.20C
X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
      Calculated based on average gas characteristics to acid plant

      Desired minimum ratio for processing in a double contact sulfuric
      acid plant

      Considered too low for processing  in a double contact sulfuric
      acid plant
                                  261

-------
considered to have ratios too low for proper conversion without
dilution air or oxygen.  Consequently, they would not follow the
strategy of this blenging section to reduce the volumes of offgases
to the acid plants.
     The remaining scenarios tend to reduce offgas volumes to the
acid plant while increasing SOo concentrations and still  maintaining
adequate Oo/SCU ratios.  The actual  amounts depend upon the scenario
in question, however, those that reduce the volumes to about 110,000
or less may be attractive from an economic viewpoint.  This occurs
because these volumes can be processed in one acid plant while
higher volumes usually require two acid plants (assumed as current
standard practice in the industry).
     The gas volume flow rates and S02 concentrations to be pro-
cessed in FGD systems are all higher than those included in Table
6-4.  The exact values depend upon the scenario in question but
generally are about triple those in Table 6-4.

     Total S02 control efficiencies for these scenarios are somewhat
lower than those presented in Table 6-4.  The major difference in
control efficiencies for scenarios in Table 6-4 and Table 6-6 is
that acid plant control is over 99 percent, while FGD systems are
assumed to control only about 90 percent.  Thus, increasing volumes
to the FGD systems while decreasing the acid plant handling capacity
will markedly affect the total S02 control efficiency based on assumed
control efficiencies.
    A comprehensive cost evaluation  is warranted to  fully  assess the
economic  viability of  the  above scenarios  and those  presented  in
Section 6.1.2.  Although it  is expected that  some of the scenarios
may be more  cost-effective than the  control  approaches presently used,
additional cost data  is necessary.
     The  final control system choice, whether it be  blending, tradi-
tional acid  plant control, or new smelting technology, will be based
on both economic and control capability considerations.

                                 262

-------
                             SECTION 7
                   APPLICATION TO EXISTING SMELTERS
7.1  GENERAL
     The approaches used to control  weak S02 offgas streams from
new copper smelters can, in general, be applied to existing smelters.
However, retrofitting of any control approach will generally in-
troduce untque problems for each specific smelter.
     As discussed in previous sections, the accepted control approach
in the copper smelter industry is to send S02 laden offgases to a sul-
furic acid plant.  All smelters in the United States using reverbera-
tory furnaces produce an offgas stream with an SOp concentration too
low to serve as feed gas to a sulfuric acid plant.  Thus, the major
type of smelting equipment that must be controlled is the reverbera-
tory furnace.
     With the older smelters using multihearth roasters, an additional
low SOp concentration offgas stream is produced.  The major reason for
this is that multihearth roasters and connecting duct work, currently
in operation, are quite old and have many leakage points.  In some
cases, the duct work being used may be constructed of brick and has
been in place for over 50 years.  With all these leakage points and
with the systems generally operating at negative pressure, the induced
or dilution air that enters the system reduces the S02 concentration
to well below the required acid plant input value.  Furthermore, the
increase in gas volume as a result of the infiltrating air makes control
of the final offgas considerably more costly by increasing the size
of any control system.
     Thus, in the case of existing smelters, thare are two major types
of equipment that must be controlled, the multihearth roasters and

                              263

-------
the reverberatory furnace.  These are continuously operating devices
and can be adapted to add-on controls, to produce low volume high
SCL concentration streams.  These streams can then be blended with
converter gases.  Close attention to operating of the converters
including programming, offgas pickup hood design, and proper exhaust
system design and operating is currently required to maintain steady
feed conditions to the acid plant.
     Another major problem that is encountered in some smelters when
retrofit control systems are considered is the available space to
place control equipment.  Many smelters have equipment that is very
closely spaced and in order to find room for control equipment, such
as precipitators or baghouses, it Is necessary to place these units
some distance from the equipment to be controlled.

7.2  PROCESSING TECHNIQUE MODIFICATIONS
     The major first step that must be taken by an existing smelter
to approach weak S02 stream control from either the reverberatory
furnace or the multihearth roasters is to seal up the system.  This
includes not only sealing leaks in the reverberatory furnace and the
multihearth roasters but, even more important, leaks in the connect-
ing duct work that transfer the gases to the acid plant.  It has
              ro
been estimated   that downstream leakage from reverberatory furnaces
may easily be as much as 100 percent or more.  Thus, where current
typical reverberatory furnaces with leakage generate over 100,000
scfm, the reverberatory furnace system in Japan generates only 55,000
scfm after extensive sealing efforts.
     The second most applicable technique, one that has been demon-
strated to produce a reverberatory furnace offgas of sufficient
strength for direct processing in a sulfuric acid plant, is oxygen
enrichment (Section 3).  The development work at the Caletones
smelter in Chile  (over 4 years) converted a typical green charge
reverberatory furnace operation to total pure oxygen/fuel burning.
This resulted in  SO- offgas concentrations of well over 5 percent
indicating that reverberatory furnace S02 control with a sulfuric
                                 264

-------
acid plant is feasible.  The increase in production, at least for
that smelter, resulted in an economic advantage over conventional
operation.  The copper smelting industry is familiar with the handling
and use of pure oxygen since this is an accepted technique for addition
to converter air.   Oxygen/fuel  burners are available and have actually
been used on an experimental basis in some reverberatory furnaces in
the United States  (Section 3).   Since the Caletones experience
was with a green charge furnace,  some question  remains as to the
potential for control  of calcine charge furnaces.   Some work is
currently being performed in Canada using oxygen/fuel  burners with
calcine charge furnaces.
     Relatively smaller yet significant gains can, in some cases,
be accomplished by other processing technique modifications such as
elimination of converter slag return, operation at lower air-to-fuel
ratio, instrumental  control particularly pressure control, and con-
tinuous furnace charging.  Blending of reduced volume flows that
result from system sealing also may be a viable technique in particu-
lar situations.  Converter scheduling and improvement of converter
offgas collection systems, specifically including installation of
shutoff and modulating dampers, can increase SCL concentration from
offgases in those smelters that do not have a modern system design
allowing greater blending flexibility.

7.3  FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION SYSTEMS
     The use of the lime/limestone gypsum neutralization and the
magnesium oxide concentration system have been demonstrated in
Japan (Section 4)  for control of reverberatory furnace offgas.  The
gypsum producing system with lime or limestone has the advantage of
removing the SCL in solid form that can be "thrown away" without
introducing any additional pollution problems.   This system may be
the most logical for existing smelters to control  calcine charge
reverberatory furnaces because of the smaller amount of S(L generated
compared to green charge furnaces.
                                265

-------
     The magnesium oxide concentration system generates an S(L stream
in the 10 to 13 percent concentration range.   While this obviously
will allow direct processing in a sulfuric acid plant, it is still
relatively low.  The citrate concentration system, on the other hand,
generates an SCL offgas stream over 90 percent concentration which
considerably reduces the size of the entire subsequent gas handling
system.  The magnesium oxide system has had several years experience
in Japan on a full-scale basis operating with smelter reverberatory
furnace offgases.  Conversely, the citrate system has only had pilot
plant experience with metallurgical gases at smelters in the United
States and in Sweden.  If the choice were to be made between these
two systems, the citrate system would have the obvious advantage
except for the fact that actual full-scale experience is not yet
available.  In addition, the use of this concentrated S02 stream
can readily allow production of liquid SO,, or perhaps even sulfur
with subsequent processes.  The liquid S02 production would be
quite simplified in using this concentrated stream.
     The use of systems to produce sulfur introduces the problem of
providing a reducing agent which is in all cases a fuel.  The
experience with coal as a reducing agent (which is the most logical
in view of the current energy problem) has been demonstrated but
has not been shown to be a highly efficient process.
     The Cominco ammonia scrubbing system has had extensive experience
under full-scale smelting conditions with low SO,, concentration.  A
major problem of plume opacity is apparently one that appears to be
solvable.  Cominco is currently constructing equipment to solve the
problem as a result of successful pilot plant testing.
     Thus, several FGD systems are available with either actual full-
scale operating experience at smelters or with sufficiently promising
pilot testing to indicate a potential for application to specific
smelters.  The local conditions at each smelter will, of course, con-
siderably influence the selection of any given system.
                                266

-------
7.4  BLENDING
     Blending of gases to generate a rich enough stream to be pro-
cessed directly in a sulfuric acid plant is more difficult with
existing smelters.  This is primarily because of the additional
weak streams particularly from the multihearth roasters.   The local
conditions at the smelter and the potential for minimizing in-leakage
of air to the system will have a major influence on the capability
for blending of gas streams.   It should be noted, however, that
there is a considerable range of options that must be considered
to determine the optimum blending design at any specific smelter,
as evidenced by the scenarios shown in Section 6.

7.5  ECONOMICS
     Average values for the costs of controlling of weak SOp streams
from existing smelters are not sufficient to determine acceptability
of any given approach.  It is necessary to review each individual
smelter on a case-by-case basis because of all of the unique prob-
lems that occur with each smelter.  For example, the installation of
specific duct work, sealing problems, metallurgical conditions, and
the general feed and production situation of any particular smelter
will strongly influence the selection of a minimum cost approach.
However, it should be emphasized that to obtain a minimum cost approach,
all factors must be considered in relation to each other and to the
specific local conditions.  The entire smelting process, from feed
constituents, either present or possible future, and their metallurgical
requirements through to the potential  marketing or disposal  of pollu-
tion control products, must be evaluated concurrently to determine
the optimum economic situation.   The pollution control  considerations
are so extensive and influence the operation of the smelter to such
a great extent, that they must be included as part of the overall
copper production system to obtain or define the most economical path
to follow for any specific smelter.
                                267

-------
                             SECTION 8
                            CONCLUSIONS

     The major weak S02 gas stream from copper smelters is the offgas
generated by the reverberatory furnace.  This gas concentration is
too low to process directly in a contact sulfuric acid plant,  the
accepted sulfur S02 control system.   Two major basic approaches
have been considered and are indicated for controlling the reverberatory
furnace.  The first is to modify or improve furnace operating  techni-
ques to provide more favorable offgas characteristics facilitating
control.  The second is to introduce either neutralization or  concen-
tration systems for the weak S02 gas stream.
     Combinations of the various control approaches discussed  in this
study can result in minimizing overall costs and increasing effective-
ness.  The major cost-effective approach appears to be sealing of all
systems either with new or existing smelters to minimize offgas volumes
that must be processed.
    Using oxygen enrichment for reverberatory furnaces with a  green
charge appears to be a demonstrated technique for increasing the
weak S02 stream to a high enough value to process directly in  a sulfuric
acid plant.  Neutralizing the weaker S02 offgases with a lime  or
limestone system for calcine charge reverberatory furnaces also appears
to be an economic approach, although only full scale green charge
systems have been completely demonstrated.  The magnesium oxide S02
concentration system has been demonstrated on a full-scale smelter
and can produce gases with an S02 concentration of 10 percent allowing
direct processing in a sulfuric acid plant.  The citrate concentration
system has been demonstrated on a pilot-scale with metallurgical gases
indicating it can concentrate weak S02 streams up to the 90 percent
level which provides greater economic advantages.  The ammonia
                                268

-------
scrubbing system has been used with weak S02 streams from a full-scale
smelter.   The plume opacity problem encountered when using this system
has been  eliminated on a pilot scale and is currently being installed
at full scale.
     The  combination of a FGD or concentration system with a sulfuric
acid plant may introduce economies as far as capital costs are concerned
Retrofitting any of the approaches for existing smelters must be
determined on an individual local condition basis.
     In general, from a technical standpoint, it can be stated that
with all  of the considered approaches discussed in this study that
weak S02  offgas streams can be controlled from copper smelters.
The cost  and system to retrofit these approaches must be determined
on a site specific basis.  The cost to apply to new smelters may be
of the same magnitude as the increase in cost for changing to flash
smelting  or some other new smelting process rather than using the
conventional roaster, reverberatory furnace, and converter technique.
                                269

-------
                             REFERENCES
 1.   "Background Information  for  New  Source  Performance Standards:
     Primary Copper, Zinc,  and Lead Smelters Proposed Standards,"
     Vol.  1, EPA Publication  No.  450/2-74-002a, October 1974

 2.   Reference 1

 3.   Hayward, C.R.,  "An  Outline of Metallurgical  Practice," D.
     Van Nostrand Company,  Inc.,  1952

 4.   Reference 3

 5.   Ellis, O.W., "Copper and Copper  Alloys," American Society  for
     Metals, 1947

 6.   Weisenberg, I.J.,  and Umlauf, G.E.,  "Evaluation of  the Controlla-
     bility of.S02 Emissions  from Copper Smelters in the  State  of
     Arizona," Pacific Environmental  Services, EPA,  Contract
     68-02-1354, Task 8, 1975

 7.   ASARCO, Inc.

 8.   Visit to Onahama Copper Smelter, January 25, 1977

 9.   Anderson, R.J., "Operations  at  Utah Copper Division  Smelter,"
     in R.P. Ehrlich (Editor) Copper Metallurgy,  Extractive
     Metallurgy Division of the Metallurgical Society, Denver,
     Colorado, February 15-19, 1970

10.   Rinckhoff, J.B., "Sulfuric Acid  Plants  for Copper Converter
     Gas," ACS Paper, April  4, 1974

11.   Reference 1

12.   Personal Communication with  Tim  J.  Browder,  Metallurgical
     Acid  Plant  Consultant

13.   Itakura, K., Nagano, T., and Sasakura,  J., Converter Slag
     Flotation—Its  Effects on Copper Reverberatory  Smelting
     Process.  J. Metals, v.  21,  July 1969,  5 pp.

14.   Jackman,  R.B., and Hayward,  C.R.,  "Forms of Copper Found in
     Reverberatory  Slags."  Trans. AIME, v.  106, 1936, 11 pp.

                                 270

-------
                        REFERENCES  (Continued)


15.  Itakura, K., Ikuda, H., Goto, M., "Double Expansion of Onahama
     Smelter and Refinery," Paper No. A 74-11, The Metallurgical
     Society of AIME, 1974

16.  Niimura, M., Konada, T., Kojima, R., "Control  of Emissions at
     Onahama Copper Smelter," Joint meeting MMIJ -  AIME 1972,
     Tokyo, Japan

17.  Weisenberg, I.J., Umlauf, 6.E., "Evaluation of the Controlla-
     bility of S02 Emissions From Copper Smelters in the State of
     Arizona."  Pacific Environmental Services,  Inc., EPA Contract
     No. 68-02-1354, Task 8, May 1975

18.  Pawson, H.E., "Giants Milling Operation," Paper presented at
     Canadian Mineral Processors Meeting, January 23-26, 1973,
     Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

19.  Review comments by J. Henderson, ASARCO

20.  Anderson, R.J., "Operations at Kennecott's  Utah Copper Division
     Smelter Reverberatory Department,"   Copper  Metallurgy,
     Extractive Metallurgy Division of the Metallurgical  Society,
     Denver, Colorado, February 15-19, 1970, pp.  146-147

21.  Saddington, R., Curlook, W., and Queneau, P.,  "Tonnage Oxygen
     for Nickel  and Copper Smelting at Copper Cliff," Journal of
     Metals 18 (4), pp.  440-452

22.  Reference 15

23.  Goto, M., "Green-Charge Reverberatory Furnace  Practice at
     Onahama Smelter,"  Extractive Metallurgy, International
     Symposium on Copper Extraction and Refining, Las Vegas,
     Nevada, February 22-26, 1976

24.  Eastwood, W.B., Thixton, J.S.  and Young, T.M.,  "Recent Develop-
     ments in the Smelting Practice of Nchanga Consolidated Copper
     Mines' Rokana Smelter," TMS Paper No.  A71-75,  Metallurgical
     Society of AIME, 32 p, Pamphlet (1971)

25.  Pluzhnikov, A.I., et al., "The Possibility  of  Using Roof Firing
     of Reverberatory Furnaces," Tsvetnye Metally,  Vol.  12,  No. 10,
     October, 1971, pp.  7-11

26.  Kupryakov,  Y.P., et al., "Operations of Reverberatory  Furnaces
     on Air-Oyxgen Blasts," Tsvetnye Metally, July  1972,  pp. 13-16

27.  Reference 26


                                 271

-------
                      REFERENCES  (Continued)
28.  Wrampe, P., and Nollmann,  E.G.,  "Oxygen  Utilization  in  the
     Copper Reverberatory Furnace:  Theory and  Practice,"  IMS
     Paper No. A74-25, Metallurgical  Society  of AIME,  18  p,
     pamphlet (1974)

29.  Beals, G.C., Kocherhans, J., and Ogilvie,  K.M., "Reverberatory
     Matte - Smelting Process,"  United States Patent Office
     3.222,162 Patented December 7, 1965

30.  Zhuravlev,  Y.A., et al., "Selection  of an  Efficient Thermal
     Load in a Reverberatory Copper Smelting  Furnace in the  Case
     of Oxygen Enrichment," Tsvetnye  Metallurgiya,  No. 6,  1975,
     pp. 120-125

31.  Reference 30

32.  Reference 19

33.  Chizhikov,  D.D., "Present  State  of the Problem of the Use of
     Oxygen-Enriched Air in  Non-Ferrous Metallurgy," A.A.  Baikov
     Metallurgical Institute, Academy of  Sciences of the U.S.S.R.

34.  Reference 28

35.  Reference 29

36.  Goto, M., "Green-Charge Reverberatory Furnace  Practice  at
     Onahama Smelter," Extractive Metallurgy,  International
     Symposium on Copper Extraction and Refining,  Las  Vegas,
     Nevada, February 22-26, 1976

37.  "Use of New Technologies at Caletones Smelter," H. Schwarze
     D. G. Vera  B., F. Pino  0.,  TMS Paper Selection No. A  77-90
     Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York,  New York, 1977

38.  Reference 21

39.  Reference 26

40.  Reference 26

41.  Reference 30

42.  Reference 28

43.  Itakura, L., Ikeda, H.,  and Goto, M., "Double  Expansion of
     Onahama Smelter and Refinery," TMS Paper No. A74-11,
     Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1974, p.  29
                               272

-------
                      REFERENCES  (Continued)
44.  Reference 23

45.  Reference 24

46.  Reference 37

47.  "Improvements in Full  Use of Oxygen in Reverb Furnaces at
     Caletones Smelter," J. Achurra H. R.  Expinosa E.,  L.  Torres J.,
     IMS Paper Selection No. A77-91, Metallurgical Society of AIME,
     New York, New York, 1977

48.  Smirnov, V.I., "Possibilities of Technical  Progress in
     Reverberatory Smelting of Copper Concentrates," Tsvetnye
     Metal1y. pp. 5-7

49.  Reference 14

50.  Otvagina, M.I., et al., "Sulfuric Acid Production  from Rever-
     beratory Furnace Gases," Tsvetnye Metal1y.  Vol. 12, No. 7,
     July 1971, pp. 5-7

51.  Reference 28

52.  Reference 30

53.  Reference 26

54.  Reference 50

55.  Reference 50

56.  Reference 29

57.  Reference 47

58.  Reference 24

59.  Reference 21

60.  Reference 26

61.  Reference 21

62.  Reference 28

63.  Reference 29
                                273

-------
                      REFERENCES (Continued)


64.  Reference 19

65.  Reference 26

66.  Reference 21

67.  Reference 26

68.  Reference 26

69.  Reference 15

70.  Reference 28

71.  Reference 37

72.  Reference 47

73.  Reference 28

74.  Reference 26

75.  Reference 15

76.  Reference 3

77.  Reference 28

78.  Reference 28

79.  Reference 19

80.  Reference 16

81.  Reference 16

82.  Nissen, W.I., et al.,  "Citrate Process for Flue Gas Desulfuri-
     zation, a Status Report," Paper presented at the 6th Symposium
     of Flue Gas Desulfurization in New Orleans, La., March 8-11,
     1976

83.  McKinney, W.A., et al., "Design and Testing of a Pilot Plant
     for S02 Removal from Smelter Gas," Paper presented at the
     Annual AIME Meeting,  Dallas, Texas, February 23-28, 1974

84.  Reference 83
                              274

-------
                       REFERENCE (Continued)
85.  Zhuravlev, Y.A., "Zonal  Three-Dimensional  Model  and Calculation
     of Heat Exchange in a Reverberatory Copper Smelting Furnace,"
     Tsvetnye Metal1y, No. 2, 1975, pp. 91-96
86.  Reference 43
87.  Reference 48
88.  Personal Communication with Flakt
89.  Reference 88
90.  Reference 88
91.  Reference 88
92.  Reference 88
93.  Personal Communication with Mr. Gunnnar Wai in of Flakt,  Sweden
94.  Reference 88
95.  Reference 88
96.  Reference 88
97.  Reference 93
98.  Reference 93
99.  Ramsey, "Use of NH3 SOo-HoO System as a Cyclic Recovery  Method,"
     British Patent 1,427
>uo-ri9U
 (T883)
100. King, R.A., "Economic Utilization of Sulfur Dioxide from
     Metallurgical  Gases," Industrial  and Engineering Chemistry,
     Vol. 42, No. 11, November 1950, pp.  2241-2248
101. Reference 83
102. Burgess, W.D., "S02 Recovery Process as Applied to Acid Plant
     Tail Gas," Chemistry in Canada. June 1956,  pp.  116-119
103. Report to the U.S. Bureau of Mines by the Smelter Control
     Research Association, "Engineering Evaluation of Soluble
     Scrubbing Systems," March 1974
                                275

-------
                       REFERENCE (Continued)
104.   La Mantia,  C.R.,  Lunt,  R.R.  and  Shah,  I.S.,  "Dual Alkali
      Process for S02 Control,"  Paper  presented at the 66th Annual
      Meeting of  the American Institute of Chemical Engineers at
      Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  November 1973

105.   Pedroso, R.I., "An  Update  of the Wellman-Lord Flue Gas
      Desulfurization Process,"  Paper  presented at Symposium of
      Flue Gas Desulfurization,  New Orleans, March 1976

106.   Reference 100

107.   Infra-red Remote  Sensing and Determination of Pollutants in
      Gas Plumes, H.W.  Preagle,  et al.,Environmental  Science and
      Technology, May 1973,  p. 417

108.   MHI Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems Applied to Several
      Emission Sources, N.  Hirai et al.

109.   Personal Communication, Mr.  Marvin  Smith, Gypsum Association,
      Los Angeles, California

110.   Reference 5

111.   Sulfur in 1975, Mineral Industry Surveys, U.S.  Department of
      the Interior,  Bureau  of Mines

112.   Mineral Facts  and Problems,  1975 Edition, U.S.  Department of
      the Interior,  Bureau  of Mines

113.   Reference 112

114.   Arthur D. Little, Inc, "Evaluation  of  S0?/as Controls
      Economic Impact on ASARCO  Smelting  and Refining at Tacoma,"
      Report to EPA, 1976

115.   Reference 21

116.   Reference 28

117.   Personal Communication with  Mr.  A.J. Kroha,  of  ASARCo

118.   Waitzman, D.A., et al., "Marketing  H2S04 from S02 Abatement
      Sources —  The TVA Hypothesis,"  EPA Publication 650/2-73-051

119.   Commodity Year Book,  1976
                                276

-------
                     REFERENCES (Continued)
120.   McGlamery,  G.G.,  et al.,  Detailed Cost Estimates for Advanced
      Effluent Desulfurization  Processes,  EPA Publication 650/2-75-
      006 (TVA Bulletin Y-90),  January 1975

121.   Reference 118

122.   Chemical  Marketing Reporter,  October 25, 1976

123.   Reference 114

124.   Reference 114

125.   Reference 114

126.   Sulfur in 1975, Mineral  Industry Surveys. U.S. Department of
      the Interior, Bureau of  Mines

127.   Reference 112

128.   Reference 122

129.   "Standards  of Performance for New Stationary Sources:  Primary
      Copper, Zinc, and Lead Smelters," Federal Register, Vol. 41
      No. 10, January 15, 1976

130.   Reference 1

131.   Reference 6

132.   "A Report on Removal of  S02  From Copper Reverberatory Furnace
      Gas with Ammonia  Double-Alkali  Process," SCRA, Inc.,
      December 1977

133.   Correspondence with Jan  H. Reimers and Associates, Mettal-
      lurgical  Consulting Engineers

134.   Reference 1

135.   Reference 1

136.   Reference 133

137.   Reference 1

138.   Carpenter,  B.H.,  "Nonferrous  Smelter Studies:  Investigation
      of the Role of Multihearth Roaster Operations in Copper
      Smelter Gas  Blending Schemes  for Control of SOo; Part 1,"
      RTI, EPA Contract No. 68-02-1325, Task 35, May 1976
                                277

-------
                      REFERENCES  (Concluded)
139.  Merkle and Associates,  Inc.  Engineers, Suspended Refractory
      Designs

140.  Reference 133

141.  Personal  Communication  with  Tim J.  Browder, Acid Plant
      Metallurgical Consultant

142.  Reference 133

143.  Reference 1

144.  Weisenberg, I.J.,  et al.,  "Appendices:   S02 Control  for  the
      Primary Copper Smelter  Reverberatory Furnace,"  Pacific Environ-
      mental Services, EPA Contract No.  68-03-2398, August 1977

145.  Weisenberg, I.J.,  et al.,  "S02 Control for the  Primary Copper
      Smelter Reverberatory Furnace," Pacific  Environmental Services,
      EPA Contract No. 68-03-2398, August 1977

146.  Weisenberg, I.J.,  and P.S.  Bakshi,  "Process Parameters for
      Primary Copper Smelters and  Their  Effects  on Arsenic Emissions,"
      EPA Contract No. 68-02-2606, PES Project No. 266,  July 1978
                                278

-------
                             APPENDIX A
                 MULTIHEARTH AND FLUID-BED ROASTERS

A.I  MULTIHEARTH ROASTER DESIGN AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
A.1.1  INTRODUCTION
     The blending of lean SOo gas streams from reverberatory fur-
naces with stronger gases from other smelting equipment to obtain  an
SOp concentration capable of direct processing in a sulfuric acid
plant is one technique for increasing sulfur capture in the primary
copper smelting industry.  Roasters, as indicated in Section 2
facilitate the smelting process by introducing the flexibility of
adjusting sulfur and impurity elimination.  While fluid-bed roasters
are known to emit high SO- concentrations (8 to 10 percent), a
considerably lower value is emitted from some multihearth roasters
in current United States production because of the excessive air
dilution resulting* from the poor condition of many units.  The pur-
pose of this section is to define realistic multihearth units.
Analysis will include theoretical considerations as well  as review
of actual S02 concentrations from a number of multiherath roasters.

A.1.2  BACKGROUND INFORMATION
     The conventional copper smelting process involves three indi-
vidual process steps -- roasting, smelting, and converting.   Roast-
ing drives off a portion of sulfur from the charge producing cal-
cines that yield a desired copper matte (30- to 45-percent copper)
during subsequent smelting operations using the reverberatory
furnaces.  The converting process upgrades the matte to blister
copper (98 percent).
                                279

-------
    Typically copper  ores are  low  grade  and  are not  economically
suitable  for direct  smelting.    Copper  ore-bodies  in  the  United
States have a low overall copper content (1 percent or less).
Additionally, most of the copper ores and concentrates are rela-
tively high in sulfur content and if fused directly to matte, will
form a low-grade product high in impurities.  Thus, it is a common
practice to concentrate these low-grade ores to produce a higher
copper content (15- to 35-percent copper) material prior to
roasting.l
    A copper content of 30- to 45-percent in the matte is commonly
used.  A higher percent tends to result in a higher percent of
copper retained in the furnace slag while a lower percent requires
more oxidation of iron and sulfur in the matte during the subsequent
and more expensive converting stage.2  Thus, ore concentration and
sulfur removal in the roasting operation must be controlled to put
the reverberatory and converting operations in the best economical
balance.
    In addition to the aforementioned considerations, multihearth
roasters have been indicated by some sources in the industry to be
effective in removing arsenic and other impurities; hence, it is
preferred for roasting concentrates that contain high concentrations
of such impurities.3,33  Thus, multihearth roasters can, under
certain conditions, be the more desirable approach for treating
copper ores  in the United States.

A.1.3  MULTIHEARTH ROASTERS
    Figure A-l4 shows a  typical multihearth roaster which is
essentially a cylindrical, bricklined vessel divided  from top to
bottom by horizontal brick hearth.  Each hearth has one or several
drop holes in the brickwork, leading to the hearth below.  The drop
holes are located alternately on the inner and outer  peripheries  of
successive hearths.  A central, rotating brick surfaced steel column
extends vertically through the center of the roaster.  On each
                                 280

-------
              r"A
   BasfGartrmthCfiangr    \ •
                                                »_..&/!-.
                                                -••:.-l-i~>-kfJK
                                                   jMerfiamt
                                                     FttdPbk
Figure  A-l.   Typical  Herreshoff Multihearth Furnace
                           281

-------
hearth, arms equipped with rabbles are fixed to the rotating central
shaft.  The charge is supplied to the top hearth near the central
shaft and rabbled to the periphery where it falls through the drop
holes to the hearth below.   The rabbles on this hearth push the feed
toward the central shaft where it drops to the next hearth.  This
zigzag pattern continues until calcine exits from the bottom hearth.
    There are several makes of multihearth roasters which differ
slightly in design but all  are based on the general principles of
the McDougal furnace.   The main points of difference in
construction of these multihearth roasters are the construction of
central  shaft, method of attaching rabble arms to the shaft, method
of attaching t'eeth to the rabble arms, method of cooling shafts and
rabbles, method of introducing air to the hearths  , and number of
hearths.  Table A-l lists some of the design parameters of the
common roasters used in the copper smelting industry.  At present
practically all roasters have at least six or seven hearths with a
tendency toward increasing the number to eight, nine or more.
Diameters vary from 19 to 25 feet and the heights vary from 18 to
over 47 feet.  The central shaft not only supports the rabble arms,
but contains pipes which conduct the cooling air or water to the
rabble arms.  Central shafts range in diameters up to 4 feet which
enables a man to enter it for repairs.  The speed of this shaft,
which is driven by a motor and train of gears beneath the furnace,
is on the order of one to two RPM.  The methods of attaching rabble
arms to the shaft and teeth to the rabble arms vary, but they all
have the objective of easy replacement with minimum loss of time.
The cooling of the shafts and rabbles are done either by water or
air, with air cooling being the most common practice.  The methods
of air introduction vary but the main objective is to promote accur-
ate temperature and atmosphere control to ensure proper roasting.
    During  roasting of copper ores it is not desirable to
completely  remove the sulfur in the feed because control of the
matte is primarily accomplished by providing specific copper to
                                 282

-------
Table A-l.   SUMMARY OF S00 EMISSIONS FROM MULTIHEARTH ROASTERS



Ref-
er-
ence



1





2




3


4



5








i




7











Coa»any


Phelps
Dodge.
Douglas.
Arizona





ASARCO,
Tacona,
Hash-
Ington



ASARCO,
Hayden,
Arizona


ASARCO,
El Paso,
Texas


Horanda,
Duebec,
Canada







Kashoe.
Anaconda.
Montana




801-5.
Yugo-
slavia







Type of
Roaster
(Hwfcer)



Herreshoff
(24)





Herreshoff
(10)



HcDougal
(5)
HcDougal
( 3)
Herreshoff
( 3)
Bartlett-
SMM
Pacific
t 11
I >)
Herreshoff
I 4)



Hedge (8)








HcDougal
(56)




K.«,ln
(5)








Mutter
of
Hearths



7





H/A'



e
7
7
H/A

7



7"








6




11






Dimensions
of
Roasters

Helgnt
(ft)



18.50*





25



23.75
22.75
8.50
34.75

H/A



H/A








H/A1




47.6






Dim-
eter
(ft)



21.58





19



24
19
21.58
25

22.5



25








H/A*




21.3











HP



H/A





H/A



IS
10
10
40

H/A



15








H/A




«/A











RPM



H/A





H/A



2
2
2
2

H/A



1.09








H/A




1 5*









Feed Rate
Tons/
Day



175"





250b




225'


250'



292b








40"




zoo"






Sulfur
Percent



29 "





29. £




28 "


26 '



24.3b








34 »




40 c







Exhaust Gas



SCFH



,6.11!'





20.000C



I5.000C
15.000°
15.000C
10, mf

!0,014*



«>,420C








6,667C




7,560*'






Percent
S02
(by
Volume)



1.7"





1.5"




1.8 "


.79



i








2.25




4«d








Hornal
Roasters
In
Service



18





5




•'


H/A



H/A








H/A




H/A







Ton/
SCFH
(Sulfur
In
feed)



0.003





.004




.004


.003



.003








.002-




.011











Footnotes
* Value taken for standard
Herreshoff roaster
Average per roaster
c Average per roaster based on
18 roasters In service
d Low - probably due to consid-
erable air In leakage, (toast-
ers arranged In double row.
4 Typically 7 hearths arranged
In double row
Average capacity per roaster
c Average per roaster for range
of 30.000 - 70.000 SCFH total
d Average. Subject to air
In leakage.
Average per roaster
Average per roaster based on
28 percent sulfur
c Average per roaster
d Average based on 1.1 - 2.5
percent sulfur
* Average based on 6 - 10. All
but one roaster subject to air
leakage. Arranged In double
row.
Average per roaster based on
maximum roast feed
Arranged in double rows.
* 7 internal and 1 external
drying
Average per roastar from Janu-
ary 1 - June 30. 1933
c Value taken fro* approximate
roaster treater handling
450.000 ft'/min, therefore
average per roaster based on
SCFH at 1 .000DF
* Typically 24' diameter x
23.75'
Average per roaster
c Estimation (ft3/m1n) per
roaster at 48
d Based on (a)
14 rows. e«ch with 4 furoices
* Average (1 - 2 RPM)
b Design for each roaster
c Average from test 3.5. 6 per
roaster
d Average from test 2.3.4,5,
per roaster
Tests 1 and 6 were ruled out
due to fluctuations in roaster
performance and feed variances.
Note:  These data cover nearly an 80 year time period and should
       be considered as indicative of the technology and not
       necessarily current operations.
                              283

-------
sulfur ratios in the calcine feed to the reverberatory furnaces.
Partial roasting is characterized by oxidation  of a  portion  of
the sulfur content of the feed and a conversion of part of the iron
sulfides to iron and sulfur oxides.   Air is  usually  introduced at
the bottom of the roaster and passes up through heated chambers
where oxygen in the airstream reacts with iron  and sulfur in the
feed to liberate heat which sustains the roasting hearth tempera-
tures.  Under such conditions, the tendency  is  for iron sulfide
to be oxidized in preference to copper sulfides and  since only
a partial roast is obtained, it follows that most of the copper
will remain as copper sulfides or copper sulfates.
     There is a limit to the amount of sulfide  exposed per unit
time to the action of oxygen and, therefore, to the  amount of
heat liberated per unit of time.  If a large excess  of air is
used, it may absorb so much heat that there  is  insufficient  heat
available to keep the roasting ore above its ignition point
(about 300°C).   Thus, the oxidation of sulfide minerals will
cease as soon as this temperature is no longer  maintained.
Similarly, if there is too good a contact with  oxygen, there is
the possibility of the temperature rising to the melting point
of the ore which excessively reduces the sulfur in the calcine
product.
     Additionally, temperatures affect the various chemical  reac-
tions occurring in the roaster and ultimately the SOo concentra-
tion in the exhaust gases.  The heat of formation of sulfates is
higher than that of corresponding oxides so  if  temperatures  are
low enough, sulfates will be formed with an  obvious  decrease in
the elimination of sulfur.  The equation CuO +  SOQ—^CuSCL  is
                                          7
driven to the left at higher temperatures.   Thus, toward the
end of the roasting step, it is necessary to maintain higher
temperatures than at the beginning in order  to  decompose the sul-
fates which have a tendency to form.  Figure A-2 shows the pro-
gressive removal of sulfur and the flame temperature profile for
a McDougal roaster with six hearths.
                                284

-------
0%     20
         1st  Hearth
         2nd Hearth
         3rd Hearth
         4th Hearth
         5th Hearth
                    1
         6th Hearth
40     60
                                                  80    100%
                                          '
-------
it is brighter near the outer periphery.   Here the maximum
temperature of 960°C is attained.   On the sixth,  the final,  hearth
heat has become uniform but lower  (860°C).  As the ore leaves the
hearth it seems brighter, but speedily cools off to 660°C as it
falls, smoking freely, into the hopper."

     Current operating temperatures tend to be lower than discussed
above, generally in the 550 to 700°C range during the first  stages,
increasing to a maximum of 800 to  850°C1Q depending upon  the low
melting point constituents of the  charge.  The strategy is to keep
the charge below the sintering temperature on the upper hearths and
maintain as high a  heat as possible on the lower hearths.   Tempera-
tures are influenced and controlled by furnace design, air regulation,
rate of feed and amount of sulfur  in the  ore.
     Particle size and percent sulfur in the feed are known to
influence roasting.  Large particles roast slowly and sometimes
incompletely due to limited surface area and diffusional limita-
tions.  On the other hand, fines can cause dust entrainment and
roast so fast that sintering may occur.  When the initial sulfur
content is below 24 percent, it is necessary to finish roasting
                     Q
with extraneous heat.   The resulting exhaust gases, diluted
with products of combustion, are leaner  in S02 concentrations.
     The depth of  roaster bed, number and  design of  drop holes and
number of hearths  have a definite effect on  the  roasting process.
It  is assumed that about 60 percent of the sulfur removal takes
place on the hearth bed while  about 40 percent takes place  as  the
ore drops through  drop holes.    Thus, if  the roast  bed  is  too
 thick there will  be  diffusional limitations  with  a  decrease in
 roasting resulting.   Townsend  et  al.   investigated  the  roasting
 of lumpy chalcopyrite in an  air stream at  temperatures between 550°C
 and 750°C and followed the transformations with  a  microscope  and
 microprobe.   The  roasted particles  had an extremely  porous  zone of
 hematite covering a compact layer of magnetite.   The thickness of
 the layers  was  independent of  the  roasting temperature.   Traces of
                                 286

-------
copper ferrite  (CuFe204) were found  in the hematite and were
presumed to have been formed as result of establishment of a local
equilibrium.  Details of the transport of oxygen and sulfur through
the impervious magnetite layer could not be explained.  Winterharger
et alJ^ found that during the roasting of copper containing
pyrrhotite, various copper-iron sulfides occurred as sequential
phases in the receding sulfide kernal, and copper sulfides were con-
verted to cuprite  (Cu20).  As roasting continued (in air or in
S02-rich gas), there was a zonal  progression of these sequential
phases, as would occur if the reaction rate-determining step were
the gas-phase diffusion processes occurring in the pores of the
roasting product.  This rate-determining step has also been shown by
other investigators to approximate closely the burning of iron sul-
             13
fides in air.    The rate of oxidation appears to be determined
by the rate of diffusion of gaseous reactants through the solid
crust which covers the core of the sulfide particles.  Chemical re-
action occurs at the boundary of solid metal  sulfides and metal ox-
ides.  Oxygen diffuses in; S02 diffuses out.  Unconsumed oxygen in
the gases provides the driving force.  As oxidation proceeds,  dif-
fusion becomes more difficult and the reactions slow down.  Addi-
tionally, at oxygen concentrations lower than about 13 percent in
the gases next to the solid particles, the fire goes out.  Data in-
dicates that active oxidation of the charge requires about 13 per-
                                                           14
cent oxygen in the gases and temperatures of 640° to 760°C.
     Drop hole area will affect the  velocity of the gases in contact
with falling ores.  If the holes have a large area then the velocity
of the gas in contact with the ore will diminish—facilitating a
better roast.  Since some roasting takes place during the drop from
hearth to hearth it is obvious that  a larger number of hearths will
facilitate a more complete roast.
    Some furnaces are designed with  special air ports on each hearth
while all furnaces have doors on each hearth which can be used in
air regulation.  In those furnaces with air-cooled rabble arms, air
can be admitted to the hearths through holes in the arms.  Another
                                 287

-------
method commonly used with air-cooled rabble arms, is to use this air
as preheated air for the roasting process.  For these roasters the
the central shaft  is constructed in sections consisting of an inner,
cylindrical part (cold air tube) and an outer annular part (hot air
compartment).  Cold air is forced in through the cold air tube and
passes from here into hollow rabble  arms,  thus  serving to keep
them cool.  The heated air coming from the rabble arms enters the
hot air compartment,  and from here it may be discharged to waste
at either the top or bottom of the shaft,  or admitted to hearths
as preheated combustion air.   It is  the usual  practice to admit
most of the air on the bottom hearth which brings an excess of
oxygen upon the ore as it is ready to leave the furnace.  By the
time the air reaches the upper hearth much of the oxygen has been
replaced by S02 causing less rapid roasting of the fresh ore and
consequently minimizing the danger of sintering.  The hearth doors
may be partly opened to supply additional  oxygen to prevent sul-
fate formation or opened wide to allow a large excess of air to
rush in and cool an overheated charge.
     Temperatures are ideally set from 600° to 700°C during the
first stages of roasting and increase to 800° to 850°C by the final
stages.    The strategy is to keep the charge below the sinter-
ing temperature on the upper hearths and maintain as high a heat
as possible on the lower hearths.  The need to remove arsenic
from some concentrates calls for consideration of the temperature
to which the solids should be heated during the roast.  Among the
arsenic sulfides that may be present in copper ores are FeSAs2$3,
ASpSo, and As^S,-.  The As^S., boils at 707°C, while ASpSc sublimes
at 500°C with decomposition.   Arsenic trioxide melts at 310°C and
boils at 475°C.  Thus, a portion of the arsenic will be vola-
tilized at operational temperatures within the roaster.  Also,
the amount of oxygen present affects arsenic removal.  As20~
is preferred since it is quite volatile and will pass off with
the roaster gases; however, in an oxidizing atmosphere, much of
the arsenic will oxidize to As205 which is less volatile and
                                 288

-------
form stable, nonvolatile arsenates with other metallic oxides.
Usually, it is necessary to alternate oxidation and reduction
several times to completely remove arsenic.   A similar phenomenon
applies to antimony which goes from SbpO, to SbpOj- in an oxidizing
atmosphere.  Thus, roasting can be ideally controlled for some
impurity removal through proper temperature  and air regulation.
     Finally, typical roasters handle from 125 to 150 ton/day using
high sulfur charge.  If copper is high in the charge the capacity
may be increased since less roasting is required (i.e.,  there is
more sulfur left in the product).  Roasters  can handle up to
350 ton/day.17'18

A.1.4  S02 EMISSIONS FROM MULTIHEARTH ROASTERS
    Table A-l lists data obtained from several multihearth roasters
                                             IQ ?n ?i ?? ?? ?A  ?£>
in the United States and one from Yugoslavia.  '*"''"'"'*'  °
These data indicate that the SOp concentrations (by volume) vary
from less than 1 to 5 percent.  It should be noted that roasters
1 to 4 in Table A-l were reported to have considerable air
leakages which would result in low S0« offgas concentrations.
    Additionally, roasting eliminates a portion of sulfur in  the
feed which is based on the required Cu/S ratio for the subsequent
smelting operations.  Thus, if a feed contains a small percent  cop-
per and another feed contains a larger percent copper, then in  order
to obtain the same Cu/S ratio for both feeds, a larger percent  of
sulfur must be eliminated in the former.  Roasters 2 and 5 in
Table A-l had a feed copper content of 22.8  and 5 percent, respec-
tively.  Thus, to obtain similar Cu/S ratios, it is apparent  that
roaster 5 had to eliminate more sulfur indicating a more complete
roast and a subsequent higher S02 concentration.   Nevertheless,
average SO? concentrations of 4 percent by volume have been reported
                                              7ft ?7
for multihearth roasters in the United States.
    An accurate calculation of the oxygen consumed for any specific
roasting case requires knowledge of the mineralogical character
                                289

-------
and degree of transformation of the particular charge.   However,  a
general formula for estimation of oxygen consumption  using  the
predominant chemical,  metallurgical,  and thermodynamic  aspects  of
                              28
the process has been proposed.
    Table A-2 lists the mineral conposition  of the roaster  charge
for the Bor and Majdanpek ore concentrates  and the quantities of
the minerals in the calcine produce therefrom.   The aforementioned
reference (28) calculated heat balances based on reactions
considered to be most significant for the Bor roaster.   The accuracy
of the calculated results depends upon accuracy of the  required
input data; the weight fraction of components in the  calcine; the
fraction of dissociable sulfur and arsenic (or other  minor  elements)
actually removed; and the fraction of copper oxidized.   The results
are shown in Tables A-3 and A-4.  These calculations  were based
upon data for the Bor, Yugoslavia roasters.   It was also assumed
that the ratio:
    FeS2 to
         to
is constant over a broad range of sulfur removed in the offgas,
that the fraction of copper oxidized was about 0.8 the ratio of
sulfur removed by dissociation/dissociable sulfur in charge,
and the fuel oil was assumed to contain 1  percent sulfur and
provide about 150,000 Btu/gallon when burned with 15 percent
excess air.  Additionally, these values for S02 concentrations may
be somewhat lower for charges containing significant quantities
of Sb, Pb, Bi, and Zn since, theoretically, these compounds can
affect the heat balance and subsequent gas S02 concentrations
primarily because their elimination requires oxygen.  The conclu-
sion reached in the study was that the S02 concentration in exit
gases from multihearth roasters can be held above 5 percent pro-
vided at least 6 percent of the sulfur is removed from the charge.
Also maintaining this concentration level  requires monitoring the
                                 290

-------
Table A-2.  MINERAL  COMPOSITION  OF  ROASTER
    CHARGE AND CALCINE,  CLEAN  CONCENTRATE28
Mineral Components
Clean Charge
FeS2
CuFeS2
ZnS
Inerts
FeS
FeO
Fe3°4
CuFeS2
CuOFe203
ZnO
Total
Kkg per 100 kkg of Charge
In Charge
25.18
49.01
1.52
24.29






100
In Calcine
1.05
24.29
6.78
0.21
2.31
32.28
21.83
1.27
90.02
                     291

-------
>- Z
C£ LLJ I—
O I— Z
   Z UJ
C3 O O
^ o a;
at
3

                              « 3 «
                                    I
                  10 »•
                                                   01 0>

                                                   SS
   UJ
oo     »
p— i    oo
00  . UJ
-<
O I-H _l
   o o
Z _J O
« o
UJ O
      _
  "X Q-
00 UJ
•z.    z
o •• o
i— i (_j i— <
I— o   I—
< o <:
_l O i— i
ro od a
0 Al <
_i    a;
<; oo
_i    z
<: I— L±J
s: 1-1 o
a: x a:
   <_) I—
   o  3
 • LT> CT>
CO PvJ

ca:  ., ..
   UJ UJ
  «
« •« *

115 3
                                                 -
                                        f  1
                             292

-------
  C£ OO
  LU LU
• •i—oo
oo <: oo
i—i 3 O
00   _l
<
CD  . CJ3
  O Z
LU O  i—I
CJ O —I
cz «a- o
— < A I L"-1 tr>
(—   O r-H
< oo on
—I  LU
•—   t—
J3 >- Z
03 CC O
h- Q O
          i!ii!iIMtli!§u
          !i*^??S5*IIS«*ll.
                  293

-------
exit gas 0? concentration and controlling it at 12 percent along
with controlling heat losses to a maximum of 15 percent and calcine
exit temperatures to a maximum of 1,364°F.

A.1.5  CONCLUSIONS
    Based on actual SOp offgas emissions (see Table A-l), multi-
hearth roasters are capable of releasing S02 concentrations up to
4 percent volume.  Likewise, the above study indicated that at
least 5 percent S02 (up to 7 percent) offgas concentration can be
maintained provided:
    1.  At least 60 kg of sulfur is removed per kkg charge
    2.  Exit gas Q£ concentration does not exceed 12 percent
        (assuming oxygen is supplied by air addition with
        consequent  increase in the accompanying nitrogen dilution
        effect)
    3.  Controlling heat losses to a maximum of 15 percent
    4.  Controlling the calcine exit temperature to a maximum of
        740°C
    The S0£ concentration will vary depending on the amount of
sulfur contained in the ore and the actual operating parameters.
Nevertheless,  a 5 percent SO? offgas concentration seems feasible
in  discussing  the capabilities of the multihearth roaster.
    Additional means may be employed to upgrade the S0£ concentra-
tion from multihearth roasters.  These points may be summarized as
follows:2^
    1.  Operate with the lowest oxygen concentration consistent
        with smelter calcine requirements
    2.  Drying in a separate operation
    3.  Better insulation and recovery of heat from rabble-arm
        cooling air
    4.  Preheat  incoming air
    5.  Keep exit calcine temperatures lower
    6.  Modification:  reduce air infiltration to a controllable
        level; effect control through the use of oxygen monitors in
        the exit gas duct.
                                 294

-------
A.2  FLUID-BED ROASTER DESIGN AND OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
    Fluid-bed roasting involves the autogenous oxidizing of sulfide
particles while they are suspended in an evenly distributed stream
of air.  It is based upon the principle that the blowing of air
through a bed of fine solids tends to support the particles at mod-
erate velocities.  These particles may be permanently suspended in
an expanded or fluidized bed.  The particles are essentially
surrounded by air so that rates of gas/solid roasting reactions
are high.  The reactions occurring are similar to those occurring
in multihearth roasters (refer to Appendix A.I).
    Figure A-3 shows a cutaway of a typical fluid-bed roaster.
Air is blown into the roaster by means of a tuyere plate at the
bottom, and concentrates are added in particulate or slurry form
near the top of the roaster.  The roasting operation is begun by
heating the roaster (usually containing an inert bed of sand or
calcines) to the temperature at which the concentrate will ignite
by air.  The temperatures are maintained between 930° and 1,300°F.
The concentrates are then added, slowly at first to begin the
roasting and to make the operation autogenous.

      Reaction rates within the roaster are rapid and an important
 consequence is the high efficiency of oxygen utilization by the
 roasting reactions.  This  leads to air requirements only slightly
in excess of the stoichiometric amount.  SCL concentrations in the
effluent roaster gases are  considerably higher than those of the
multihearth roaster,  it is 8 percent compared to 4 percent (new units

      Figure A-3  shows a cutaway of a  typical fluid-bed roaster.  The
fluidized state  is accomplished by considerable agitation of the
particles in the bed which  results in efficient heat transfer and a
uniform  temperature across  the roaster.  This, in turn, permits
accurate control of the roasting temperature.
      One problem,  however,  caused  by  the  high  chemical  efficiency
of  the fluid-bed is  that  the roaster  tends to  overheat due  to  the
                                 295

-------
                                                  OFF-OS
           SLURRY
            FEED
             TUYERE
             HEADS
                                                  PRODUCT
                 Figure A-3.  Typical Fluid-Bed Roasted (Text)
exothermic oxidation reactions.   This could result in sintering,
overoxidation, or agglomeration  which could collapse the bed.   This
problem is generally rectified through the addition of water or
inert fluxes (for use in subsequent smelting) with the concentrates.
     During copper roasting, a major portion of the fluidized solids
are carried out through the top  of the roaster.  These are collected
in cyclones above the roaster while the remainder of the solids over-
flow the fluid-bed portion of the roaster.  Thus, the bottom portion
of the roaster contains a stable fluid-bed in which the larger par-
                                 296

-------
tides are oxidized.   In design, the larger particles which require
lengthy oxidation times have a long residence time in the stable bed
portion, while smaller particles are blown out before they have time
to overoxidize.   Thus, the fluid-bed roaster offers a means of pro-
ducing an even roast.
     A critical  factor in fluid-bed roaster design is that the lar-
gest particles in the concentrate must become.fluidized, thus pre-
venting tuyere clogging and eventual collapsing of the bed.  Hence,
the velocity of the gas must be considered of prime importance in
actual operational  practices.

      The residence times of particles  control,  in part,  the  extent
 of the oxidation reactions  taking  place.   The  residence times  are
 controlled by varying the depth of the stable  bed,  the  rate  of con-
 centrate feed,  and air flow rate.
      Advantages of fluidized roaster over conventional  multihearth
 roasters include:
      1.   Roaster offgases are ideal  for making  sulfuric acid
          since  the roaster operates under continuous steady
          state  conditions with a relatively high  S02 concen-
          tration in  the offgas.
      2.   Offgas volumes are reduced significantly due to reduced
          air requirements.
      3.   Reduced residence time and consequently  fewer  pieces
          of equipment needed for the same production.
      While it appears that the current philosophy in the copper in-
 dustry is to use fluid-bed roasters, some problems may  exist that
 would inhibit their  use.  Fine grind is needed and with underground
 ores it might be necessary to reduce the  size  so  much that the grind-
 ing costs could be excessive.  Also, there may be an increase in
 magnetite formation  depending upon the composition of the charge.
 Finally, there is  some concern over problems with impurity removal
 due to the decreased residence time within the roaster.
      Fluid-bed roasters are reported to be undesirable  for process-
 ing concentrate ores  containing high impurity levels.   These impur-

                                  297

-------
ities are relatively difficult to separate by volatilization, and a
fluid-bed roaster may not provide sufficient residence time for com-
plete separation.  However, this is entirely dependent upon the
impurities and their concentrations in the feed.   Multihearth roasters,
on the other hand, provide a much longer residence time as the ore
travels through each hearth.
     In a recent study, it was found that the amount of arsenic
volatilized in the roaster and furnace combined appear to be the
same for both the fluid-bed roaster-reverberatory furnace combina-
tion and the multihearth roaster-reverberatory furnace combination,
although the fluid-bed roaster volatilizes less arsenic than a multi-
hearth roaster for a given set of conditions.
     Although the multihearth roaster is capable of removing more
arsenic than a fluid-bed roaster, a fluid-bed roaster is being used
at the Anaconda  smelter where the feed input is high in arsenic con-
tent.  This is contrary to the belief that fluid-bed roasters should
not  be used when the arsenic content in smelter feed is high.  How-
ever, the Anaconda fluid-bed roaster, in conjunction with an electric
furnace, produces a matte grade above 50 percent.  The choice of
the  type of roaster used with a "high" arsenic content feed does
not  seem to be governed by the high amount of arsenic in the feed,
but  by the quality of matte desired from the smelting furnace.
Since multihearth roasters seem to yield calcine which produces a
lower grade matte than fluid-bed roasters for any given amount of
arsenic elimination, they tend to be preferred whenever the above
two  qualities are desired simultaneously.  This is particularly
true when lead and antimony are present.  Complete proof of the
above observation has not been established.
     Nevertheless, fluid-bed roasters warrant consideration for
weak stream S02  control since the blending of fluid-bed roaster,
reverberatory furnace, and converter offgas has been reported
feasible and produces a considerably higher combined S0? concen-
        32
tration.
                                298

-------
                             APPENDIX B
         REVERBERATORY FURNACE HISTORY, DESIGN AND OPERATION

B.I  FURNACE FUNCTION
     The primary function of the reverberatory furnace is to
economically smelt the required copper-bearing charge into a
molten mass.  The objective of the furnace operation is to pro-
duce separate fluid layers of lower specific gravity discardable
slag (iron-gangue comprising the top of the bath)  and a higher
specific gravity matte (consisting theoretically of a mixture of
Cu2S'FeS comprising the lower fluid layer).  The matte can be
separated by selecting tapping levels.  It is then further treated
in other furnaces for separation of Cu from the Fe and S.  The slag
is tapped from the furnace at a higher level and usually discarded.

B.2  BRIEF HISTORY
     Previous to the development of the first reverberatory in
America at Colorado Smelting and Mining Company in Butte, Montana
                 33
in the year 1879,   most smelting was done in blast furnaces.
The ore content of oxides and pyrites, available at that time,
were more readily processed in blast furnaces.  With sulfide ores
becoming more prevalent, the reverberatory furnace became the
more efficient processing device.  The first reverberatory fur-
naces were of the batch type and the charge was smelted by grate-
burning of wood or charcoal.  From the first small  10 ton per day
batch furnace, size gradually increased up to lengths of 50
meters (160 feet) and widths of 11 meters (36 feet).  As heat
loss increased with the area of refractory arch and side-wall
surfaces, the largest furnaces proved less economical, and
present-day dimensions are slightly over 30 meters (100 feet) in
                                 299

-------
length and 8.5 to 10.4 meters  (28 to 34  feet)  in  width  in  most
instances.

B.3  MODERN CONSTRUCTION
     Reverberator!es are large horizontal  chambers  constructed  of
refractory material  throughout,  capable  of being  fired  through
one end and containing an outlet flue at the  opposite end  to
allow exit gaseous  products of smelting  and combustion.
     There are two  types of roofs or arches in current  use as
illustrated in Figure B-l.  The original  arch-type  is constructed
of silica brick and is sprung  between skews and buckstays  at the
sides so that it is suspended  in its entirety, independent of
the walls or ends.   The original arch thickness is  0.51  meters
(20 inches) and is  maintained  by slurring   on the  underside
through a nozzle and a pipe connected to a Quigley-type gun.
Ribs above the original arch are sometimes installed so that an
upper or relieving arch may be installed above the  original, when
it becomes thin.  The maximum  allowable  width of  a  sprung  arch
is about 8.5 meters (28 feet)  due to inherent brick strengths.
     The second and newer type of arch is made of brick indivi-
dually suspended by means of hangers attached to  the brick and  to
the superstructure.   Refractories may be of either  silica  or basic
                                               35
brick.  This type of arch is generally panelized    into relatively
small removable sections (typically 3 by 10 feet) bound together
with new panels which can be done in as  short a time as a  half
hour.  Individual brick or pairs may also be replaced without
being part of the panel.  The  principle  advantage of suspended
arches is that any width of arch may be  used and  cross-sections
can be installed at different elevations to allow any desirable
internal contouring.  There generally is a much greater heat  loss
through an arc constructed of basic material, but bricks wear
longer under furnace conditions.  The modern trend is towards  the
use of basic suspended arches.
                                 300

-------
                                                        OJ
                                                        CO

                                                        I
                                                        S-
                                                        Ol
                                                        D.
                                                        Q.
                                                        O
                                                       O
                                                          ai
                                                        s_ jc
                                                        O  O
                                                       4-  i-
                                                       •i-  0)
                                                       (/> T3
                                                       O)  C
                                                       O  (LI
                                                           Q.
                                                       O)  CO
                                                       O  3
                                                       fO OO

                                                       S- 08
                                                       3
                                                       Li_  O)
                                                       O  Q.
                                                       •M 00
                                                       1C
                                                       S-  cn
                                                       CU  £
                                                           O
                                                       0) oo
                                                           CD
                                                       i—  C
                                                       O •!->
                                                         .
                                                       >> E
                                                       I— oo
                                                       CQ

                                                       
-------
     The sprung silica arch would remain on a furnace practically
forever, with the excellent continuous hot strength of silica,
if it were not affected by splashed matte and slag and the
corrosive fumes of the furnace atmosphere.  Unfortunately, the
chemically acid silica brick can be quite readily corroded by
the primary iron-silicate and iron-lime-silicate constituents
of the furnace fumes and slags.   The continual  use of silica
spraying furnaces has prolonged their life to as much as 12 years.
     The magnesite-chrome system of refractories (basic brick)
offers significant improvements in roof life with the typical
iron and iron silicate slags of the reverberatory furnace but is
more expensive.  However, the hot strength of basic brick is
much less than silica.  This coupled with the permanent expansion
characteristic of basic brick, makes it unsuitable for tradition-
al sprung arch construction; therefore, a suspended system must be
used on most reverbs.
     The grade of basic brick most commonly used is the chemically
bonded type with an MgO content of 40 to 60 percent.  The shapes
are normally steel encased to reduce spalling.   The steel is also
thought to form complex compounds with refractory-iron ingredients
that are beneficial to brick life.
     Direct bonded and rebonded fused grain basic refractories
are premium type products which can give increased performance
in the high wear area of the reverb roof and have come into general
use in certain areas -- usually in the smelting zone from 10 to
40 feet beyond the burners.  However, their increased cost should
be economically justified by careful analysis of their performance.
     Their are various types of brick suspension as shown in
Figures B-2a through B-2d.  The first and most common involves
suspension from rods hooked into tops of bricks, usually using
one rod for two brick.  A more recent innovation involves
suspension of brick by interlocking with a refractory to which
the suspension rod is attached.
                               302

-------
        Figure  B-2a
Typical Tile Support System
           Figure  B-2b
        Panel Construction
         Figure  B-2c
            Typical      Roof
Cross
           Figure  B-2d
              Sections
 Figure  B-2.   Suspended  Arch  Brick Assembly and Mounting Design
                               303

-------
     Sectionalizing of brickwork into panels is now commonly
practiced in the smelting zone.  It is claimed that an average
time required to replace a 3 by 10 foot panel is about a half hour
as compared to several hours to replace a similar area with
individual or paired brick.  Replacement panels are prefabricated
and bound beforehand and effect a saving in hangers required.
    Furnace sidewalls are constructed of refractory material
in brick form that may be of silica, clay or basic material
although the basic type is generally used on the inner face of
the furnace and below the bathline.  Walls may be corbelled
(bricks set so as to form short supporting brackets) because
of the temperatures and liquid attack -beneath the bath line
and under the burners.  Hater or air cooled jackets of copper,
steel, or cast iroja are generally used around tap holes, skim
bays, bridge walls and, in the deep bath furnace, generally
all along the entire bath line.
     External  insulation of the brickwork has been tried but is
not extensively used as fusing and melting of the internal  face
of the brickwork is greatly increased with its use.
     Most furnace bottoms rest upon a tamped sand, clay, or
concrete base of several feet thickness.  On this base will be
layers of magnetite-slag, chrome ore, quartz, converter slag,
used in combination or singly, and all fused into place.  Even-
tually bottom thicknesses are several feet deep, the final  thick-
ness being determined by type of furnace, desired bath depth and
temperature and peculiarities of the charge to be smelted.   Bot-
tom cooling may be accomplished by means of air piped under or
through the bottoms or just above the foundations.  Typical fur-
nace across sections are shown in Figure B-3.
     Most of the actual smelting is done in the first 70% of the
furnace length, allowing almost complete separation of the matte
and slag layers in the balance of the furnace length.  The most
intense smelting zone is usually about 15 to 20 feet from the
                         qc
burners and temperatures    will range from 1500°C (2800°F)

                               304

-------
  Holf Section~A-A
Half Section "B-B"
Figure  B-3.  Transverse  Half Sections of  Furnace9
                     305

-------
 to 1700°C (3100°F)  in this area.   Bath temperatures in the furnace
 will  range from 1300°C (2300°F)  down to 1100°C (2100°F),  usually
 near the skim bay.   As the slag forms in the top layer of the
 bath, it receives more heat reflected from the flame and the
 arch and is the hottest portion of the bath.  It also serves,
 undesirably, as a protective barrier for heat transfer to the matte
 layer beneath.  The height of the furnace arch above the bath-
 line is determined by the heat and combustion requirements of the
 smelting, plus heat losses through the refractories and in slag
 and matte removal,  so as to allow approximately 1,000 Btu per
 square foot of cross-sectional area.
       t
      Either sprung or suspended arches may be used in furnaces
 of either side-charged or bath smelting types.  Installation plus
 maintenance costs are comparable for either sprung or suspended
 arch types and, today installation would be between $4 and 5
 million for a furnace complete with  auxiliaries.   The
 advantages of the reverberatory furnace lie in its flexibility
 and in its ability  to handle up to 1600 tons of hot charge or
 1200  tons of green  charge per day.  Use of oxygen  or preheated
 combustion air would raise these capacities considerably.

 B.4  FUELS
     Originally, wood or charcoal was the only fuel used,  but
in the early 1900's coal came into prominent use, being first
burned on grates and later pulverized and blown into the fur-
nace with pressurized air.  This was gradually replaced by oil
fuels in the 1920's,and in the 1930's the use of natural gas
firing became most common.  With the shortages of natural  gas
in the early 1970's, all plants are reverting back to some oil
firing and many are  planning on eventually returning to the use
of pulverized coal.   Gaseous fuels give a clear nearly invisible
flame, oil fuels produce a semi-luminous flame and pulverized
coals  produce a luminous flame.
                                 306

-------
      With  the  rapidly  developing  energy shortage,  the  only  large
 reserve  of fossil-fuel  energy  in  the  United  States is  coal,  so
 it is inevitable that  coal will be  the  furnace  fuel  of the
 future.   Its use gives  a  much  more  luminous  flame  than does  oil
 or gas and the heat  transfer from flame to charge  is thought to
 be more  efficient.   The two main  disadvantages  of  its  use  is
 that it  must be finely pulverized just  before use, and the  pre-
 sence of fly ash after its combustion may either form  a thin
 insulating blanket on  the furnace bath  and/or contaminate  the
 gases with additional  particulate matter that is hard  to remove.

 B.5  FURNACE BURNERS
     A vast conglomeration of burner types and positions have
been used in various  reverberatories in  past  installations.
Most of the "odd-ball"  burners  have  fallen by the wayside,  and
the use of standardized main  burners through  the bridgewall
(using only pressurized primary and  secondary air for idealized
combustion} is  now becoming  almost universal.
      Burners must be large enough and numerous  enough  to supply the
 heat necessary to smelt the tonnage of  charge desired-insofar
 as cross-sectional area is available  for proper combustion.   The
 trajectory of  the flame from each burner must be such  that the
 maximum  heat is transferred directly  to the  charge and a minimum
 to the furnace arch.  The use  of  a  combustion chamber  upstream
 of the furnace has generally been abandoned  as uneconomical.
 The judicious  use of oxy-fuel  burners through the  arch is becom-
 ing more prominent and  this is desirable to  "level-out"  the
 temperatures in the  charge smelting zone.
      In  general,  furnaces are  equipped  with  five to eight main
 burners  through the  bridge-wall and the ports are  usually
 jacketed to protect  both  burners  and  wall.   Each burner is
 capable  of slight adjustment (movement) to direct  its  flame  in
 the desired trajectory.   Proper mixture of fuel and air is
 essential  at all  levels of burner capacity.

                               307

-------
B.6  FURNACE CHARGING CONFIGURATION
     There are two types of reverberator!es in current use and
they differ principally in the amount of bath and the method
charging.
     The first type in use, and still extensively used, is the
deep-bath furnace, wherein a molten bath of several  feet depth
is maintained throughout the furnace, covering the entire
bottom.  The charge may be admitted to the furnace by dropping
through the arch, through retractable or fixed charge guns,
discharging through ports in the sidewalls which extend some
distance towards the middle of the furnace, or in one instance
through green charge slingers that cover the entire bath in
the smelting zone.  A calcined charge must be used through
charge guns or through arch drop holes in  the center or along
the furnace sidewalls.  Green charge may also be dropped
through the arch or introduced through belt slingers.  In all
cases, every effort  is made  to distribute  the charge on top
of the deep molten bath  in the smelting area, to expose the
largest possible area to the heat from the burners and the arch.
Water or aircooled jackets in the sidewalls are used because the
molten bath is in direct contact with the sidewalls.
      The second  type is  the  side-charged furnace, (see  FigureB-4)
which is more  predominately  in  use today and  usually has  a  bath
depth of three feet  or  less.  Basically, the  green  or  calcined charge
is dropped through the  arch  along  the walls  to  form banks  of material
that  slowly melts, giving  sufficient protection  to  the  sidewalls to
generally eliminate  special  cooling requirements.   The  smelted mater-
ial  forms a  liquid bath  throughout the  center length of the
furnace.   It  is  adaptable  for either calcine  or green  feed
charging or  a  combination  of both.   Typically,  feed is  gravity-
charged  into  hoppers staggered  along each  side  of the  furnace and
located  above  drop holes through the arch, a  few inches in from
the  sidewalls.   The  hoppers  may  be fed  by  calcine car  discharge,
drag chain distribution of calcine or green  feed, or by conveyor
                               308

-------
                                     x
                                     
                                  ^= U-
                                  o
                                   I   C
                                  OJ  O)
                                  -O  (U
                                   I
                                  QQ
                                  (U
309

-------
belt and tripper car for green feed.   As the angle of repose of
the charge bank is lesser with calcine charging, the height of
the charge pile must be lower or the  width of the furnace must
be greater than for the bath smelting type.   A particular hazard
in side charging is the possibility of a portion of the charge
bank flowing, caving in, or sloughing into the molten bath and
creating a rapid or even explosive reaction between charge and bath
with an accompanying boiling and rapid gas evolution, particularly
with regards to green or wet feed charging.   When using the latter
there have been rare instances where the generated pressure was
strong enough to damage the furnace arch and even blow off portions
or sections.
     Either spring or suspended arches may be used in furnaces of
either type.  If width of arch is greater than twenty-eight feet,
a suspended type arch must be used as hot brick strengths limit
the width of sprung arches.

B.7  SMELTING CONSIDERATIONS
     In past years smelter feed consisted primarily of direct smelt-
ing ores high in gangue material, generally low in copper (3 to 10%}
and comparatively high in iron and sulfur.  Roasting was thus desir-
able to help concentrate the copper by removing some of the sulfur
and oxidizing some of the iron for subsequent slag formation by com-
bination with the silicious gangue material.  In more recent years
flotation methods have been developed that now eliminate most of
the worthless gangue materials as well as some of the excess iron
and sulfur that is not combined with the copper thus furnishing a
concentrated smelter feed that can directly produce a matte of de-
sirable grade without requiring pre-roasting.  Of course, if higher
grade mattes are desired, this concentrate can be roasted to remove
additional sulfur and produce matte grades as high as 65% copper
and high grade S02 gas that can be utilized for production of
sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, etc.
                               310

-------
B.7.1  CALCINE SMELTING
     The grade of matte desired and the sulfur content of the smelter
feed determines the need for pre-roasting, although desired production
of sulfuric acid, or need for increased furnace capacity are other
considerations.
     The smelter feed may be calcined in flash, multi-hearth, or
fluo-solid roasters.  The primary objective is the elimination of
the first atom of sulfur combined with the iron.  Over-roasting pro-
duces sulfates and magnetite and results in a "dead" or unreactive
furnace charge.  Inevitably some metal sulfides are oxidized, prin-
cipally the iron and part of qny zinc or lead present.  In ores
containing arsenic and antimony, a percent of these elements are
generally fumed off.  Controls are more positive in the fluo-solids
roaster, which accounts for its present popularity in new installa-
tions.  Elements volatilized or fumed off in the roasters are often
recoverable from the particulate matter collected in the flues by
electrostatic precip^tators or baghouses, and may thus be reclaim-
able.  Most roaster gases contain strengths of S02 high enough for
acid production and may run as high as 15 to 29 percent SO,, in the
fluo-solids type of furnace.
     Anywhere from 11 to 16 percent of the sulfur content in calcine
from the roasters is released in the reverberatory furnace in the
ratio of about 97 percent in the exit gases and the balance in the
furnace slag.  Normal calcine-fed reverberatory exit gas contains
about 0.4 to 1.0 percent SO^ under ordinary operating conditions.
Calcine-fed furnaces generally require between 2.5 to 4.0 million
BTU's per ton of charge to smelt, the variance depending upon the
refractoriness of the charge.

B.7.2  GREEN FEED (WET) CHARGE SMELTING
     With advances made in hydrometallurgical  and concentrating
processes in recent years, a smelter feed with sufficiently high
copper content usually can be obtained for direct smelting and thus

                                311

-------
eliminate the added expense of pre-roasting.   As long as the charge
does not contain an excessive amount of sulfur (preventing proper
matte grade formation), no roasting is required.

B.7.3  PRODUCTS
B.7.3.1  Matte
     Matte, which contains the metallic sulfides, is obtained al-
most simultaneously with the smelting of the  charge and, containing
the heavier base metals (Fe and Cu), settles  in the lowest layer
of the molten bath.  At times, when more than 10 percent of the
furnace charge consists of copper precipitates, a layer of molten
copper has been known to lie beneath the matte.  A matte grade of
40 to 45 percent Cu is most economical for subsequent converter
treatment but older smelters have been operated with matte grades
as low as 16 percent Cu.  Lower matte grades  are desirable when
there is much secondary copper-bearing material such as reverts and
scrap brass to be smelted in the converters and there is sufficient
converter capacity available.  Specialized smelting may produce a
matte grade as high as 75 to 85 percent, which is difficult to treat
in the converters.
     The matte should be tapped from near the bottom of the molten
bath, preferably through the sidewalls, in the area comprising the
front 30 percent of the furnace length.  Tapping techniques vary
in different plants and have been covered by many articles written
in the past.  A matte temperature of around 1,000°C (1,800°F) is
desirable for further treatment processes.

B.7.3.2  Slag
     Slag, which contains the iron, most of the other base metals
present and the gangue or worthless portion of the feed, forms when
iron in the oxide form contacts silica in the near molten state.
Traditional slag consists of a sesquisilicate or a fayalite-type
slag in the SiO^-FeD-Fe^O, system.  Copper is seldom oxidized at

                               312

-------
this stage, but if copper oxide is present, it follows the iron and
the other base metals.  Limestone is usually added to the charge to
lower the melting point, increase the fluidity of the slag and
react with alumina present to form a discardable slag wherein matte-
copper entrainment is minimized.  A common factor used in charge
computation is the sidewall silicate degree.  This is determined by
the ratio of oxygen in siliceous (acid) materials in the charge to
the oxygen in bases (such as FeO, CaO, Cu^O, PbO, MnO, ZnO, MgO,
BaO, K203, Na20, and usually AlpCL).  Slags of these types have
proven to have a relatively low melting point, are low in specific
gravity, and separate easily from matte components.

     Normal  slags  should not contain more than 0.4 percent copper
but laxity of controls and improper operating  techniques such as
slag skim level  too low, charge rate too high, poor  metallurgical
composition,  or charge drop in location not giving uniform coverage,
often results in over 1.0 percent copper content in  some slags.
In one large  western copper plant,  some previously discarded  slag
containing over 0.7 percent copper is being treated  by flotation
for further copper removal.
     Generally,  the higher "the grade of matte  produced, the higher
the natural  copper slag loss, within reasonable limits.
     In some  locations the slag is  marketed to cement plants, as
ballast for highways and railroads, or even as abrasive material.
Slag itself does not deteriorate to any marked extent upon exposure
to the atmosphere  as illustrated by several dumps still in exist-
ence from abandoned smelters operated as far back as the early 1900's,

B.7.3.3  Furnace Gases
     Furnace  gases are not treated generally except for heat  and
particulate removal.   In the interest of economics,  the gases are
invariably passed  through waste heat boilers which recover in the
range of 25 to 40  percent of the heat value in the fuel, as super-
heated steam.  This steam is then used for generation of electricity
                                313

-------
and compressed air, etc.   At one time in an Arizona location, nearly
enough electricity was generated from waste heat steam to operate
the smelter and most of the time the concentrator, mine, and a large
amount of auxiliary equipment such as lighting, etc.   This is not
generally the case today, refer to Section B.10.
     Often upward of 30,000 cubic meters (100 million cubic feet)
of gas per furnace per day at temperatures in excess of 200°C (400°F)
is involved.  Gases are principally introduced into the atmosphere
through stacks upward of 150 meters (500 feet) in height and the
trend is now toward much higher stacks such as the $13 million
380-meter (1,250-foot) high stack at International Nickel in Sudbury,
Ontario, and somewhat similar stacks at ASARCO's Hayden and Tacoma
Smelters.

B.7.3.4  Dusts
     In modern smelters, it is almost universal practice to remove
up to 99.8 percent of the contained particulate matter in furnace
gases by means of electrostatic precipitators.  The solids thus
separated from the gases are generally then added to the reverbs
or converters as they contain enough copper to make this practice
economical.  Modern Cottrells are of the plate, rod, or wire types
and are sectionalized so that one section can be isolated by means
of dampers for "rapping" (dust removal from electrodes), without
interfering with furnace draft requirements or allowing reintrain-
ment of dust.

B.8   CONTROL  INSTRUMENTATION
      Within a  relatively few years  vast advances  have been made
in the  instrumentation available to smelter operators.  The  follow-
ing  instrumentation type and controls are necessary to maximize
reverberatory  furnace operation from a centrally-located control
room :
                               314

-------
   Burner Control  - Proper combustion should be maintained
   on each burner at all  times.   In order to achieve this,
   air and fuel feed rates should be automatically con-
   trolled by use of continuous  recorded temperature and
   gas composition sampling at a few selected points in
   the furnace and flues.  Manual overrides must be
   available to the operator in  order to adjust for
   abnormal conditions.
   Draft Control  - Two sets of automated dampers installed
   in the flues are desirable.  The first would probably
   be a butterfly type automatically controlled for a
   slightly negative pressure.  It would be followed
   by a vane-type, also automatically controlled to allow
   for wide variances in furnace conditions and draft
   that cannot be handled solely by the preceding damper.
   Each boiler must be equipped with a water-cooled inlet
   drop type flue damper to allow for complete isolation
   of the boiler for repairs, cleaning, etc.
   Automatic Charging Control  - A variable-rate sealed
   charging apparatus should be installed at each charg-
   ing port and the control  should have variable rate-
   settings for each unit.   In this way the feed-rate
   at each charge port can  be  set so as to be automatic-
   ally controlled in accordance with the smelting rate
   in that location.  Manual overrides must be available
   to the operator.  Continuous charging is desirable
   insofar as it can be accomplished with proper maint-
   enance of the charge banks  or, in the case of deep
   bath smelting, an even spreading over the bath surface
   in the smelting zone.
•  Observation - Constant observation of furnace
   interior is necessary for the operator to
   advantageously use the controls and overrides
   available to him.   This is modernly accomplish-
   ed by the use of closed-circuit television
   screens in front of the control operator in-
   stead of the old method of opening various
   observation ports in the furnace walls.  Tele-
   vision viewing when coal is fired may be dif-
   ficult because of greater flame luminosity.
                     315

-------
Furnace Atmosphere - Recorded gas analysis
observations should be obtained at three or
more locations within the furnace and outlet
flues.  If subsequent treatment of gases is
to be practiced, a reading of the gas analysis
entering the treatment unit should be chart
recorded.  Oxygen, carbon monoxide and sulfur
dioxide are the primary constituents needed
for control purposes.

Temperatures - Temperature recording is needed
for flame, arch, bath, matte, slag, boiler
inlet and boiler outlet points.  It is also
desirable to know Cottrell inlet and outlet
temperatures and occasional bottom temperatures.
Additionally, temperatures of brickwork in speci-
fic areas should be available when desired
to determine refractory thicknesses, develop-
ing hot-spots, etc.

Manual Controls - Unless complete furnace
operations are computer-controlled, it is
sufficient to provide manual controls for
placing of needed fettling material, fluxing
variations or addition of other desired materials
as dictated by observance of furnace interior
and recorded data.  Custom smelters will have
greater difficulty in establishing computer control
because of feed type variances.

Bath Measurement - These measurements are needed at
periodic intervals to determine proportion of matte
to slag and to determine bottom elevations and bath
depths.  So far this is probably not automated any-
where but can periodically be done manually by use
of sounding bars.  The data should be recorded on the
furnace log at desired intervals, usually no less than
twice each shift.  A computer printout is used at the
Onahama Smelter in Japan.

Many Other Controls - Many other controls are avail-
able, both automatic and manual, in addition to the
principal ones listed.  One recently available tool
is a quick-analyzing procedural method for matte and
slag wherein component analyses are available within
an hour after taking the samples.
                  316

-------
B.9  ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR COPPER PRODUCTION
                                                        ,38
     The energy consumption in domestic copper production    was

175 trillion Btu in 1973.   Energy required to produce one  pound  of

copper was 50,000 Btu in 1973; this included mining, beneficiating,

smelting, and refining stages.  The copper production could be di-

vided into two main stages:  Mining-Beneficiation, and Smelting-
Refining.  The data for 1973 for these two main stages is  given
below in Table B-l.

      Table B-l.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR COPPER PRODUCTION
Stage
Mining-Beneficiation
Smel ting-Refining
Btu
Consumed
(billions)
87,603
87,773
Btu per
Pound of
Copper
25,497
23,935
Percent
of
Total
49.95
50.05
     These two main stages can be further divided into four stages:

Mining, Beneficiation, Smelting, and Refining.   The energy consump-

tion for these four stages is given in Table B-2.



        Table B-2.   ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY PROCESS OPERATION
             Operati  on
 Energy
Consumed
Btu/lb of
 Copper
Percent
  of
 Total
  Mining (average of underground and
    open pit mines)

  Beneficiation (average of flotation,
    leaching, and precipitation)

  Smelting

  Refining

       Grand Total
  7,560


 17,937


 17,923

  6,012

 49,432
 15.29


 36.29


 36.26

 12.16

100.00
                               317

-------
     The smelting operation can be further divided into roasting,
shops, and miscellaneous; reverberatory furnace;  acid plant;  con-
verter; and anode casting.   The energy consumption for all  these
operations for the year 1973 is given in Table B-3.

        Table B-3.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY EQUIPMENT USED
Equipment Used
Roasting, shops, and miscellaneous
Reverberatory furnace
Acid plant
Converter
Anode casting
Grand Total
Energy
Consumed
Btu/lb of
Copper
2,737
11,932
1,084
1,204
966
17,923
Percent
of
Total
15.27
66.57
6.04
6.72
5.4
100.00
                               318

-------
                            APPENDIX C
                   CONTINUOUS SIDE WALL CHARGING
               Jan H. Reimers and Associates Limited

GENERAL
     Continuous side wall charging of either green or calcine charge
is one of the methods used for reverberatory furnaces.  A bank of
charge is built up along each wall of the furnace and the feed rate
at each point along the wall adjusted to maintain a uniform bank.
This has the advantage of protecting the side walls and exposing a
large surface area to the flame.  Smelting then is carried out at
a uniform rate and the variations in the SC^ contained in the off
gas are minimized as compared to the gases from furnaces fed inter-
mittently by such devices as Wagstaff guns or slingers.
     Two examples of continuous side wall charging are at Inco's Copper
Cliff smelter Figures C-l and C-2 and Noranda's Gaspe Smelter Figures
C-3 and C-4 copper smelter.

CONTINUOUS GREEN CHARGE
     The Gaspe copper smelter went into production in 1955 and is
                                                   39
described in a paper presented to the AIME in 1957.    This smelter
was designed to treat 450 STPD of concentrate and employed green
side wall charging up until  1973 when a fluid bed roaster was
installed.
                                                            40
     The initial installation is described in the 1957 paper   and
shown in the above mentioned figures.  The green charge is fed to
94.5 foot long drag conveyors located on each side of the furnace,
which feed vertical charge pipes spaced at 3 ft. intervals along
the furnace.  Concentrates are charged for a distance of 70 feet

                                 319

-------
                                           Q_
                                           Q.
                                           O
                                           CJ
                                           00

                                           
-------
                                           o
                                           Q.
                                           Q.
                                           O
                                           O
oo



LLJ
5:

o
                                                  O)
                                                  a
                                                  (T3
                                                  c

                                                  3
       O
       4-J
       (O

       a>
       -Q
       s_
       O)
       >
       O)
                                                  c:
                                                  o
                                                  o
                                                  OJ
                                                  oo

                                                  to
                                                  10
                                                  o
                                                  S-
                                                 CM
                                                   I
                                                  OJ
                                                  CD
321

-------
                              GO
                              O
                              CO
                              GO
                              
                                               CO


                                               l/J

                                               OJ
                                               O)
                                               D-
                                               Q.
                                               O
                                               o


                                               O)
                                               o.
C3





CO


O


 
-------
I-']
                                                                                                           U.
                                                                                                                s-
                                                                                                                (U
                                                                                                                (1)
                                                                                                                co
                                                                                                                (U
 S-
 0)
 Q.
 Q.
 O
O

 O)
 Q.
 V)
 (O
C3
                                                                                                                 I
                                                                                                                O

                                                                                                                 d)
                                                                                                                 s-
                                                                                                                 3
                                                                                                                 CD
                                                   323

-------
from the firing wall, whereas the remaining 25 feet are fettled
with siliceous flux.
     Shortly after start-up the drag conveyors were replaced with a
belt conveyor system to reduce maintenance.  With this arrangement
a reversible belt was used to supply the charge pipes.  The concen-
trate filter cake, averaging 9 to 10% moisture, was fed to the
furnace at rates from 500 up to 700 STPD.
     Although some operators, using green charge reverbs, have
in the past experienced severe sluffing of the charge bank and
puffing of SO^, this was not the case at Gaspe.  In fact, some
sluffing was preferred to prevent a bench building up on the bank.
The system worked well up to 1973 when a fluid bed roaster and
calcine charge system was installed as part of a program to
increase throughput.  A similar green charge system, however,
is still in use on the two reverberatory furnaces in operation
at the Noranda smelter in Noranda, Quebec.

CONTINUOUS CALCINE CHARGE
     The reverberatory furnaces at the Copper Cliff smelter of Inco
Metals Ltd. are side wall charged with calcine on a continuous
basis.  This smelter has been in operation for a number of years
and is described in two special issues of the Canadian Mining
Journal.41'42
     Copper-nickel concentrate and silica sand flux are partially
roasted in Herreschoff roasters, located above the furnaces, to
produce a calcine which is fed directly to surge bins.  These
feed the drag conveyors on either side of the furnace.  The overall
cross-section of the reverberatory building and a furnace are shown
in the attached figures.  Cottrell flue dust is added to the drag
conveyor and the charge distributed t& the drop pipes.  With dry
charge it is possible to use a slide gate in each pipe to control
the charge distribution and maintain a uniform bank along each
side of the furnace.  The banks cover approximately 70 feet of the

                                 324

-------
side wall, measured from the burner end.
     Approximately 1500 STPD of dry solid charge is smelted in each
furnace at Copper Cliff.  By locating the roasters directly over
the furnaces the calcine enters the furnace at approximately 1000°
F and this provides some saving in furnace fuel.
     Other than maintenance on the drag conveyors, no serious
problems have been experienced over the years with continuous
calcine charging at Copper Cliff.   On the contrary, it has the
advantage of enabling the operator to adjust feed distribution along
the furnace and maintaining a uniform bank, through adjustments
to the fettling dampers.  Inspection of banks indicate no excessive
puffing of S02 or sluffing of the  charge.

SUMMARY
     Continuous side wall charging is one of the practical and
proven methods of charging a reverberatory furnace.  It has the
advantage of protecting the side walls, an important consideration
if oxygen enrichment is used, and  evens out variations in the SO^
contained in the off gas.  Whether green  or calcine charged, there
will be some inleakage of false air due to the number of feed
pipe openings along the furnace.  This inleakage, however, can
be minimized by keeping inspection ports  closed, when not in
use, and by careful control of furnace draft.
                                 325

-------
                              APPENDIX D
           RECOVERY OF COPPER CONVERTER SLAGS BY FLOTATION

     A report by the U.S.  Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines
entitled "Recovery of Copper from Converter Slags by Flotation" by
V.E.  Edlund and S.J. Hussey of Salt Lake City Metallurgical Research
Center in Salt Lake City,  Utah discusses laboratory batch flotation
tests, grindability studies, and cost studies for slag processing.
This  is Report of Investigations 7562 (Revised) 1972.
     Laboratory batch flotation tests were conducted on copper con-
verter slags to evaluate the relative merits of recovering copper
from  slow-cooled versus water-quenched slags.  Three slags containing
1.6,  5.0, and 61.6 percent  copper were used.  More than 90 percent
of the copper was recovered in a rougher concentrate leaving a 0.2
to 0.3 percent copper tailings when treating slow-cooled slag.
Lower recovery and higher  copper tailings ranging from 0.5 to 0.6
percent were obtained from quenched slag.
     Grindability studies  were made on the respective heat-treated
slags.  Quenched slags proved more difficult to grind than slow-
cooled slags.
     Cost studies showed that quenched slags can be treated at
slightly lower costs than  slow-cooled slags.  However, the cost
advantage of processing quenched slags is more than offset by
the higher copper recovery obtained from slow-cooled slags.
     The relative merits of treating converter slag by water-quenching
versus slow-cooling indicated the following conclusions by the authors
     1.  Flotation of slow-cooled slag yields a higher copper
         recovery and a lower copper tailing.
                                  326

-------
2.  Total  investment and processing costs would be slightly
    higher for treating slow-cooled slag.  These higher
    costs, however, would be offset by higher copper recov-
    eries  and slow-cooling would be more economical  because
    of the additional  copper recovered.

3.  Quenched slags are more difficult to grind than  slow-
    cooled slag.

4.  The true economics of a method for re-treating con-
    verter slag separately would require consideration of
    benefits due  to increased reverberatory furnace  capa-
    cities, simplified furnace operations, and possible
    lower  copper content in the reverberatory slags.

5.  The amount of copper in the slag has little influence
    on the residual copper content of the flotation  tailing.
                             327

-------
                           APPENDIX E
                   ONAHAMA SMELTER  REVERBERATORY
                   FURNACE FLUE GAS CALCULATIONS
General  Conditions''^0
     Fuel  Consumption  = 6Kl/Hr  =  6,000  1/Hr =  100  1/min
     Sp.  Gravity of Fuel  Oil  =  0.90  (@  100°C)
     Oil  Analysis:   S  - 2.5%, C - 87.25%,  H -  10.25%
     Quantity of Sulfur Oxidized  in  Reverb. Bath:   3.12 T/Hr
Quantity of Combustion Components
     Sulfur in Oil:  6,000 x  0.9  x 0.025 = 135 kg/hr  =
                     2.25 kg/min  = 4.96 Ib/min
     Carbon in Oil:  6,000 x  0.9  x 0.8725  = 4711.5 kg/hr =
                     78.53 kg/min =  173.13 Ib/min
     Hydrogen in Oil:   6,000  x  0.9 x 0.1025 =  553.5 kg/hr =
                       9.23 kg/min = 20.35 Ib/min
     Sulfur in Bath:  3'1| gg     = 317° k9/nr =
                      52.8 kg/min = 116.40 Ib/min
Theoretical Air Required for Oxidation of 1  Ib:
     Sulfur = 4.29 Ibs (1.946 kg)
     Carbon = 11.53 Ibs (5.23 kg)
     Hydrogen = 34.34 Ibs (15.58 kg)
Amount of Air Required for Oxidation
     Sulfur:  (116.40 + 4.96) 4.29 = 520.63 Ib/min = 236.16 kg/min
                              = 6467.5 ft3/min = 183.14 Nm3/min
     Carbon:  173.13 x 11.53 = 1996.2 Ibs/min = 905.5 kg/min
                              = 24797.5 ft3/min = 702.2 Nm3/min

                               328

-------
     Hydrogen:  20.35 x 34.34 = 698.82 Ibs/min = 316.98 kg/rnin

                              = 8681.0 ft /min = 245.82 Nm /min



Total Quantity of Air Required for Combustion and Sulfur Oxidation



     " 183.14 = 702.2 = 245.82 = 1131.2 Nm3/min



Quantity of Flue Gas = Air Required for Oxidation = Combustion

  Components



     Volume of Combustion Components @ 0°C STP
    Sulfur =
                         '    = 1363.60 SCFM = 38.61 Nm/min
      Carbon = 173.13
    Hydrogen
                . 0056
                       = 3633.93 SCFM = 102.90 Nmmin
                       ino Q            3

  Wet Total = 1131.2 + ~~ = 1182. 7 Nm /min
  Volume of .Water = 102.9 NM /min

  Dry Total = 1132.7 - 102.9 ~ 1079.8

  n
  2 Concentration
SO <;as
  2
             . 40 + 4. 96)

             . 1784
                            32
                      38 5
SO  Concentration =
                              = 3.62% Wet

                          53
                         '
SO  Concentration =
                               3.57% Dry
                             329

-------
                            APPENDIX F
  JAPANESE REVERBERATORY FURNACE PRACTICE AFFECTING S02 EMISSIONS

F.I   ONAHAMA COPPER SMELTER

F.1.1  REVERBERATORY FURNACE DESCRIPTION
     There are two reverberatory furnaces currently operating at
the Onahama smelter in Japan.   With the exception of the one
reverberatory furnace at the Naoshima smelter these are the only
furnaces of this type in operation in Japan.   Table F-l   summarizes
the furnace design configuration.
     Typical Onahama smelter sulfur balance is shown below in
Table F-2 indicating 99.7 percent sulfur-eliminated from the
stack gas.

F.I.2  METALLURGICAL PROCESSING TECHNIQUES INFLUENCING SO-
       EMISSIONS FROM THE ONAHAMA FURNACE
     The green charge furnaces are used at Onahama as a result
of a study that was made comparing this approach with a calcine
charge reverberatory furnace, flash smelting furnaces, and the
Mitsubishi continuous smelting process.  Economy, actual results,
risk factor, and technical level of the company were all considered
at the time the smelter was redesigned for increased capacity.
Expansion was also limited by the smeTter layout and available
space.  Since any new smelting system would necessitate additional
new preparatory systems., ft was determined that the conventional
green charge reverberatory furnace would be used.  A bedding
system is used to control charge composition.  A total of 55,000
tons of concentrate are handled per month plus scrap and blister
of an additional 4,000 tons per month.
                               330

-------
    Table F-l.   ONAHAMA SMELTER REVERBERATORY FURNACES

Fuel
Length3
Width9
Height9 (burner side)
(boiler side)
Bath depth
Section area of flue
Number of burners
Waste heat boilers
Number
Capacity
Steam generation (maximum)
Age
Number 1
Bunker C oil
34 m
10 m
3.6 m
3.4 m
0.8 m
10 m2
8

2
70% (x2)
32T/H (x2)
12 years
Number 2
Bunker C oil
34 m
11 m
4 m
3.4 m
1.1 m
12.5 m2
8

2
100% (x2)
47T/H (x2)
3 years
Inside brickwork
      Table F-2.   SULFUR BALANCE FOR THE  ONAHAMA SMELTER
INPUT
Concentrate
and ore
Fuel oil
Reverts
(recir-
culating)






Tons
Per
Month
15,554

243
793






16,590
Percent
93.9

1.5
4.6






100.0
OUTPUT'
Acid
Gypsum
Slag
Convert Dust
Reverts
(recircu-
lating)
Granulating &
wash water
To atmosphere

Tons
Per
Month
12,562
2,721
308
51

793

108

47
16,590
Percent
75.5
16.4
1.9
0.3

4.7

0.7

0.3
100.0
                         331

-------
     It is necessary to repair and replace portions of the furnace
roof every six months to minimize leakage.  This is particularly true
within an area of approximately 10 meters of length from the burner
end.
     There have been some problems with a small area in the arch at
the point where the oxygen-fuel burners pass through.  This resulted
from the fact that this point was cooled by the burner feed line to a
point where it was 150°C below the dew point resulting in corrosion.
No cooling jackets are used for the ports.
                         3
     The amount of 140 Nm  of oxygen per ton of charge was the maxi-
mum used in a test furnace.  Oxygen is only used in the main furnace
when an increase in capacity is required.
     The following describes the sealing and oxygen enrichment tech-
niques for increasing S02 concentration in the reverberatory furnace
offgas at Onahama, and is taken directly from Reference 47.
     "Efforts to enrich S02 concentration of the reverb offgas were
made in two ways; one to minimize air infiltration, the other to apply
oxygen to the reverberatory furnace.  Air infiltration into the offgas,
which had amounted to approximately 50 percent of the furnace exit gas
at the uptake, was reduced to less than 15 percent by eliminating air
leaks through crevices, clearances and openings of the furnace roof,
side walls, fettling chutes, damper slots, expansion joints, peep holes,
cleaning doors and especially dust discharging hoppers of the boilers
and the Cottrell treaters.  Careful and accurate draft control of the
furnace also served for this purpose to a large extent.
     The tedinitpre -ef -oxygen application  is different from the con-
ventional way of using oxygen enriched air for combustion of the main
burners.  This technique is in some ways  similar to the oxygen-fuel
roof burner applied to the open hearth of steel making works.  Two
oxy-oil burners are installed vertically  penetrating the roof of the
reverb and the intense heat of the flame  is directly transferred to
the exposed slopes of the banked charge around the midway of the
reverb, where the melting rate is low in  customary operations.
                               332

-------
     Converter slag is returned to the reverberatory furnace.  Ap-
proximately 49 ladles per day are returned.  Each ladle contains
nine cubic meters.  When converter slag is returned to the reverb-
eratory furnace the slag return door is opened, the molten slag
poured in and the door closed.
     There is approximately 15 to 20 percent magnetite in the con-
verter slag.  Nearly half of this is reduced in the reverberatory
furnace.  Therefore the converter slag does contribute to the S02
emissions.  Some of this increase will be balanced out by dilution
when air enters the slag return.
     SCL fluctuations appear to be primarily influenced by the
charging rate and frequency of charging.  The chart in Figure F-l
shows output SCL versus time.  The range generally is from 2.0 to
3.2 percent.
     The use of preheated air will increase the S02 concentration
by a small amount.  Approximately 1 percent of the total sulfur
input comes from the furnace fuel oil.
     Pressure control is set by sensor just before the uptake which
is connected to a damper downstream of the boiler.  This control
pressure is reset every week or so by observation of leakage out
the roof.  Figure F-2 shows the variation of pressure versus the
length in the furnace.
     Temperature is controlled and measured by optical pyrometers
or Temp Stiks.  The pyrometer is used at the matte tap hole and
the uptake.  Furnace temperature is controlled by changing the fuel
rate.
     Vertical stratification of S02 has been detected in the furnace.
The maximum amount of S02 appears approximately one meter above
the bath and decreases from this to zero at the roof.
     The major leakage points in the reverberatory furnaces are at
the two slag return doors, the charge ports, the burner entry (eight
burners), cracks, the oxy-fuel burner ports and the bath measuring ports.

                                333

-------
                                   Lt-
334

-------
                                                                                
                                                                                (U
                                                                                Q£

                                                                                OJ
                                                                                ^:
                                                                                •M
                                                                                

                                                                                0) "oJ
                         O)
                         U
                         re
 I/)
4->
 C
•^»

<2
                         (O
                         0)

                         01
                         cc
                                                                                              0)
                                                                                             O  ro

                                                                                              O) (O
                                                                                              c .c:
                                                                                              O    O)
                                                                                              
-------
Firing rate of individual  burners, oxygen-oil  ratio, shape and speed
of flames, angle and position of burners and the method of furnace
feed have proven to be of vital  importance through three years'  opera-
tion in a pilot furnace.  Inappropriateness of these conditions causes
increase slag loss, accretion of furnace hearth, brick damage to walls
and roofs and other unusual and hazardous problems.  Application of
oxy-oil burners to the reverb furnace has increased by about 15 percent
both smelting rate and S02 concentration of offgas."
     "The fuel of the burners is Bunker C oil.  High pressure pure
oxygen atomizes and burns the fuel in the furnace upon the fettling
slope.  The very short high temperature flame directly melts down the
charged concentrate at an extremely rapid rate.  Table F-3 shows the
specifications on these oxygen oil burners.  Through extensive test
operations over several years, it has been found that by  using oxy-
gen-oil burners, 3,000 tons of concentrate can be smelted additionally
per month and the S02 strength in the exhaust gas can be  increased  by
0.3 percent per one burner.  These auxiliary burners are  suitable for
use with  green charged  reverberatory furnaces to  increase capacity
without  increasing  exhaust gas volume.  Therefore,  theoretically, it  is
possible  to increase  the  smelting capacity merely  by  increasing  the
number of burners,  and  finally the exhaust  gas  from the  reverberatory
furnace can be  handled  by contact type  acid plant without any heat
supply from outside.   From the viewpoint  of the  damage  to the furn-
ace roof brick,  this  system  is  undoubtedly superior to  the  oxygen
enrichment system  for the main  burners.  However,  still  many prob-
 lems  remain.   For  example, there must  be  a heat balance between  auxil-
 iary burners  to ensure smooth operation."
                       Table  F-3.   OXYGEN-FUEL  BURNER
                Fuel
                Fuel consumption  (max.)
                Oxygen consumption  (max.)
                Oxygen pressure
                Length
                Diameter
                Cooling system
                                336
Bunker C oil
0.4 m3/Hr
1,200 m3/Hr
5.0 kg/cm 2
1,930 mm
150 mm
Water Jacket

-------
F.2  NAQSHIMA COPPER SMELTER

F.2.1  DESCRIPTION
     The Naoshima copper smelter is located on Naoshima Island
which lies in the Seto inland sea of Japan about 300 kilometers
west of Osaka.48  In addition to the conventional calcine charge
(from fluid-bed roasters) reverberatory furnace, an unconventional
series furnace that combines three metallurgical stages (which are
normally carried out in separate furnaces) as one continuous line
has been placed in operation.  A detailed description of this
smelter is included in Appendix G.
     The furnace charge prepared in a bedding yard, using computer
analysis, is conveyed to a fluid-bed roaster to be partially roasted.
At least 10 different concentrates are processed at the present
time with no noticeable variations in S0? emissions due to this
factor.  Flux for the reverberatory furnace is also added to improve
fluid-bed operation and to heat up the material prior to furnace
feed.  About 40 to 45 percent of the sulfur in the charge is elim-
inated in the roaster.  Gases from the roaster are sent to the acid
plant for direct processing for S02 control; the principal reason
why this roaster is used.

F.2.2  FACTORS AFFECTING S02 EMISSIONS AT THE NAOSHIMA SMELTER
     The average sulfur dioxide volume percent on a dry basis from
the reverberatory furnace is 1.5.  Maximum S02 occurs approximately
one minute after dropping a charge through one of the six Wagstaff
guns at approximately 2.7 percent S02.  Minimum concentration is
approximately 1.0 percent.  No oxygen enrichment is used at the
present time.  A charge is dropped at approximately every five min-
utes from one of the guns.  The sulfur dioxide sensor is located
downstream of the reverberatory furnace precipitators.
     Matte averages 42 to 43 percent copper, 25 percent sulfur,
and 29 percent iron.  Sulfur elimination occurs at 40 percent in

                               337

-------
the roaster, 5 to 10 percent in the reverberatory furnace, and 50
to 55 percent in the converters.
     Reverberatory furnace offgas composition includes 3 percent
oxygen at the uptake and this is increased to approximately 5 per-
cent oxygen at the acid plant inlet due to leakage.
     Reduction of calcine magnetite by oxidizing of concentrate
does tend to produce a small additional amount of sulfur dioxide
in the furnace.   The exact amount has not been determined.
                               338

-------
                          APPENDIX G
                       NAOSHIMA SMELTER

     Reverberatory furnace smelting of calcine from hearth roasting
                                                  49 50
of copper concentrate started at Naoshima in 1918.   '    Both domestic
and foreign concentrates are processed.  A smelter addition of
slightly greater capacity than the original  smelter and using a
fluidized bed roaster, Figure G-l, was constructed in 1969.  This
addition effectively added an entirely new conventional smelter in-
cluding a second reverberatory furnace.  Except for minor differ-
ces, the second smelter was essentially a duplicate of the old
smelter with roasters, reverberatory furnace, and converters.
     Development work on the new continuous  Mitsubishi process
(Section 8.6) began in 1961 and a  prototype  pilot plant was constructed
and operated at the Onahama smelter.  When the pilot plant operation
proved the technical feasibility of the process, Mitsubishi built
a semi-commercial plant at Onahama which was started up in Novem-
ber, 1971.  The old original smelter section at Naoshima was closed
in 1973 and a prototype continuous smelter of 50,000 TPY capacity
was started up in 1974 in its place.
     The new continuous smelting process off-gases are now combined
with the presently operating (No.  2) reverberatory furnace offgases.
These gases may be directed to one of three  sulfuric acid plants.
Roaster and converter gases are blended and  passed to a double
contact acid plant.
     The roaster gases are passed  to a cyclone dust collection system
Figure G-2.
     Operating data for the dust collection  system  is:
                               339

-------
           Figure G-1.   Lateral  View of Fluid Bed Roaster
1 -- GAS CARRIER OUTLET;  2 -- FEED PORT;   3 -- AIR FOR DISPERSION;
4 — AIR;  5 — MATERIAL UNDER FLOW;  6 — WATER SPRAY
         Figure G-2.  Fluid Bed Roaster Gas Treatment System
1 — FLUID FURNACE;  2, 3, and 4 -- PRIMARY, SECONDARY, AND TERTI-
ARY CYCLONE;   5 — PREHEAT BOILER;  6 — COTTRELL;  7 — TO
SULFURIC ACID TREATMENT
                                340

-------
     • Primary cyclone efficiency - 90  percent
     • Secondary  cyclone  efficiency - 70 percent
     • Steam generated by roaster waste heat
        boilers -  7.5 tons per hour
     • Electrostatic precipitator efficiency -
        99.6  percent.
     The following shows typical  operating data  for the fluosolids
roaster:
     • Roaster Charge - 53 wet tons per  hour
     • Blown in air - 300 Nm3/min (10,593 SCFM)
     • Bed space velocity - 80 cm per second
     • Tuyere pressure drop - 780 mm water
     • Bed pressure drop - 1,500 mm water
     • Bed temperature - 630°C
     • Freeboard temperature - 560°C
     • Freeboard draft - +_ 0 mm water
     • Exit gas to acid plant
          Volume 530 Nm3  (18,715 SCFM)
          S02 concentration - 11 percent
          Temperature - 300°C
          Dust content -  .0047 gr/scf
     • Thermal Output
          Gas heat content - 57 percent
          Calcine heat content - 38 percent
          Other losses -  5 percent

G.I  REVERBERATORY FURNACE
     The  partially roasted  calcine  is conveyed  by  chain  conveyor
from the  roaster  to  the calcine  hoppers above the  reverberatory
furnace,  Figure G-3.   The calcine is then  charged  into the  furnace
through the  side  wall  by  Wagstaff guns  with  direct television  view-
ing of  the bath by the  operator.   These Wagstaff guns  are arranged
in such a way  as  to  allow an  even distribution  of  the  calcine  over
the bath  in  the furnace.   The  furnace is fired  with Bunker  C oil
through six  low pressure  burners.
                               341

-------
Figure G-3a.  Vertical  Cross Section
      of Reverberatory Furnace:

1)  ORE CHARGE; 2) WATER JACKET;
3)  CLAY LAYER; 4) OPERATIONAL
PLATFORM; 5)  BURNER; 6) SLAG LAYER;
7)  MATTE LAYER; 8) CHROME ORE
LAYER; 9) CAST SLAG; 10)  SAND
LAYER;  11)  CONCRETE;
12)  CONCRETE MAT
Figure D-3b.  Lateral View
 of Reverberatory Furnace

1)  CONCRETE;
2)  CONCRETE MAT;
3)  SAND LAYER;
4)  REMAINDER ILLEGIBLE
        Figure G-3c.  Reverberatory Furnace Overhead View

1)  OFFGAS DUCT TO BOILER-NEGATIVE PRESSURE;  2)  JACKET;  3) SLAG
OPENING;  4)  MATTE OPENING;  5)  BURNER;  6)  RETURN SLAG OPENING;
7)  WAGSTAFF GUN FOR CHARGING FURNACE
Figure G-3.  Structural Views of Naoshima Reverberatory Furnace
                                342

-------
     Matte averaging 42 to 43 percent copper, 25 percent sulfur,

and 29 percent iron, is tapped from any of four tap holes, located

two on each side, and transported to the converter aisle by elec-

trically operated cars.  Slag is skimmed from the skimming hole

near the uptake end of the furnace, is granulated by seawater, and
conveyed to the slag stockyard.  The gas from the furnace is cooled

in waste heat boilers and treated by the electrostatic precipitator

which reduces the dust content to less than 0.003 gr/scf.

     Specifications for the reverberatory furnace are as follows:

     •  Length - 33 m

     •  Width -9m

     •  Height - 3.76 m

     •  Smelting capacity - 8,000 tons/month

     •  Bunker C fuel consumption - 100 liters per ton solid charge

     •  Steam generated in waste heat boiler - 33 tons per hour

     •  Precipitator collection efficiency - 98 percent

     The structural characteristics of this bath-type furnace are

described as follows:

     1.  The floor of the reverberatory furnace is composed
         of solute slag 2.3 meters thick above a 2-meter
         thick layer of sand set on the inner surface of
         concrete constructed above rock.

     2.  To prevent seepage of matte downwards, chrome ore
         and magnetite layers are above this.  Thus, an
         imprevious furnace floor is produced.

     3.  The shape of the bath portion is that of a crucible.
         To prevent erosion of the furnace wall near the
         slag line, a water-cooled jacket of cast copper
         section 510 mm high is extended along the entire slag
         1 i ne.

     4.  The crucible wall is made of clay.  The settling zone
         wall, the burner wall and the vertical wall are lined
         on the inside with chrome-magnesite brick (magnesia-
         bricks near the matte and slag apertures), while the
         outside is chrome-magnesite brick.  The ceiling is a
         suspended structure of chrome-magnesite brick.  A por-
         tion of the ceiling panel can be adjusted to control
         its temperature.

                              343

-------
    5.  The path for the gases to the boiler is inclined at
        an angle of 26°, and is made as broad and as short
        as possible to prevent blockage from accidentally
        occuring.
     6.   In order to improve the  thermal  efficiency  and the
         draft, the ceiling at the burner end is raised.
     7.   There is a slag return opening in the roof  above the
         burner.   This  opening is normally closed and not used.
     The walls and roof of the furnace  appeared to be very tightly
sealed.     The roof had gaps between the  bricks at the outer sur-
face but were sealed at the inner hot-side.   The outer gaps are
presented to allow expansion and  contraction of the  bricks within
the reverb arch.   On walking around the roof there were a few areas
where gas could be detected but,  in general, most of the area was
free of noticable odors.
     The point at which the burners enter the burner wall is tightly
sealed and there are not other openings.   There are  some points  where
a charge could be dropped through the roof,  however, these are closed
by dampers.
     Oxygen enrichment has not been used  in this furnace.  They do
have an oxygen plant at the smelter and do have the  capability of
using it if desired.  They also have the  capability  of using pre-
heated air.  What is used depends upon  specific smelting problems
they have, primarily related to the production rate.

G.2  REVERBERATORY FURNACE WASTE HEAT BOILER
     Because the exhaust gas of the reverberatory furnace is at the
high temperature of 1,250°C, thermal recovery is carried out in a
waste heat boiler, and cooling to 350°C results.  Two boilers in
parallel operation are usually provided,  and they are designed so
that one can maintain the average operational output of the reverb-
eratory furnace when one is shut down for inspection at regular
intervals.  Table G-l illustrates the characteristics of the waste
heat boiler.
                             344

-------
Table 6-1.  REVERBERATORY FURNACE WASTE HEAT BOILER CHARACTERISTICS
Item
Inlet gas amount
Inlet gas temperature
Outlet gas temperature
Supplied water temperature
Amount of vapor generated
Vapor pressure
Vapor temperature
Steam uses
Units
3
Nm /mi n
°C
°C
°C
t/h
kg/cm G
°C
—
Design Figures
1,030
1,250
350 + 30
120
33
40
420
Electricity generation
     The gas is cooled in the boiler and undergoes 90.6 percent
dust removal through two sets of four horizontal Cottrells.

6.2.1  REVERBERATORY FURNACE
     The objectives of the reverberatury furnace feeding system include
preventing as much as possible the temperature decline of the calcine
emitted from the fliro-solids roaster, the maintenance of low fuel con-
sumption of the reverberatory furnace and the preservation of dis-
persibility and fluidity of calcine.  To minimize calcine heat loss
and facilitate handling the roaster is placed as close as possible
to the reverberatory furnace.
     On each side of the reverberatory furnace, there are three calcine
weighing hoppers and the Wagstaff gun is located below.  Upon calcine
charging, the charging window of the reverberatory furnace is auto-
matically opened, the gun is moved pneumatically into the furnace and
the calcine hopper is opened.  High temperature calcine is instantly
distributed in a wide area, and it is rapidly smelted.  High efficiency
decomposition is carried out with little dust dispersion.
     A television camera is used to observe the molten bath within the
reverberatory furnace.   When is appears that the last charge material
has been melted in a given area, a new charge is introduced through
the nearest Wagstaff gun.  The gun position is selected by the operator.
The frequency of charges is approximately once every five minutes from
                               345

-------
one gun.  Each charge through the gun at 5 to 6 tons is weighed and
recorded.  The black and white television picture is very clear in
determining when the last charge had been melted by observation of
dark points and bubbles.  The next charge is introduced by simply
pressing a button, with everything automatic.  It is a very smooth
operation.
     The oil buners are fitted with six low pressure jets.  Further,
there are two silicated ore gun feeders above the burner walls, allowing
the slag composition to be controlled depending on furnace conditions.
     Generally, a minus 1 millimeter of water pressure in the uptake
of the reverberatory furnace is maintained.  Observation of the
chart during operation indicated a variation of approximately +0.2
millimeters of water.  The damper pressure control for the furnace
is located at the inlet of the Cottrell.  There are also manually
water-cooled drop dampers at the inlet to the waste heat boilers to
allow isolation for maintenance work.
     There are two matte extraction outlets  in both walls 24 m and
27 m away from the burner walls, the individual slag extraction out-
lets are  similarly placed in positions 31 meters away.   In usual
operations, the depths of the matte and slag layers are held at
660 mm and 400 mm, respectively.
     The  slag is granulated by pouring into  a large stream of water
directly  at the launder exit.
     Once or twice every month a maintenance operation is conducted
to replace damaged brick work.  The bricks  in the roof are hung by
pairs with  two bricks  per hanger.  Some arch sections are panelized.
Maintenance is probably considerably more extensive than  in the U.S.

G.3  GAS EMISSIONS PROCESSING
     The  average sulfur dioxide volume percent on a dry  basis  from
the reverberatory furnace is 1.5.  Maximum  S0? occurs approximately
1 minute  after dropping a charge through one of the six  Wagstaff
guns at  approximately  2.7 percent  SO,,.  Minimum concentration is
                              346

-------
approximately 1.0 percent.   No oxygen enrichment is used at the
present time.  A charge is  dropped at approximately every 5 minutes
from one of the guns.  The  sulfur dioxide sensor is located down-
stream of the reverberatory furnace precipitators.
     Matte averages 42-43 percent copper, 25 percent sulfur, and 29
percent iron.  Sulfur elimination occurs at 40 percent in the roaster,
5-10 percent in the reverberatory furnace and 50-55 percent in the
converters.
     Reverberatory furnace  offgas composition includes three percent
oxygen at the uptake and this is increased to approximately 5 percent
oxygen at the acid plant inlet due to leakage.
     Reduction of magnetite by oxidizing concentrate does tend to
produce an additional amount of sulfur dioxide in the furnace.   The
exact amount has not been determined.
     Cleaned and blended gases from the continuous  and reverberatory
furnaces are treated in one of three sulfuric acid  plants as determined
by the operator.  There are two single contact and  one double contact
acid plants producing 40,000 tons/month of acid which is shipped by
boat to as far away as Australia.
     A part of the manufactured acid (5,000 tons/month) at about
50 percent strength is bled from the drying tower and reacted with
the limestone milk in reactors to make wall  board grade gypsum.
Three milimeter maximum size limestone is milled in a ballmill  and
minus 200 mesh limestone milk is prepared.  The gypsum formed is
separated by centrifuge.
     The lime scrubber could be described as a type of Venturi scrubber,
however, the water is injected at the top along the centerline of the
Venturi and the gas is injected at right angles to  the centerline.
Sea water is now used but this will  be changed in the future.  No
sludge occurs within this system because the liquid is maintained
at below saturation (calcium sulfate) condition.
                               347

-------
     Total  gypsum manufacture is 10,000 tons  per month.   About
2,000 tons  per month of fuming grade acid (oleum) is  also produced.
About 98 percent of the smelter feed sulfur is  fixed  in  slag  or
captured in gypsum and acid.
     The Lurgi double contact acid plant produces 98-99  percent
sulfuric acid.  All of the exit gases from the converters and fluo-
solids roaster are treated in this plant.  The plant consists of
three semi-venturi  scrubbing  towers, eight  electrostatic mist
precipitators, ten gas coolers,  a  drying tower,  a converter with
heat exchangers and two absorbing  towers.
     To meet fluctuations of  gas volume and S02  concentration, the
acid plants are equipped with closed circuit  TV  sets,  telephone
and light signals so that the operator can  always keep track  of
smelter operations.
                               348

-------
                           APPENDIX H
                     CONVERTER PROGRAMMING

     The converter programming used for this study was based on a
typical converting process as utilized at the Ilo Smelter in Peru
and discussed by Reference 52.  This smelter uses three Peirce-Smith
converters plus maintains one on reserve.
     The typical converter charge consists of sixteen ladles of matte
added in a 5-2-2-2-2-2-1 sequence; a ladle contains approximately
16.6 tons of matte (32- to 33-percent Cu at Ilo).  The first 82.5
tons of matte (5 ladles) are added to a converter containing 5.9
tons of flux remaining from the previous charge.   This flux had been
used to cool the bath surface and to get a clean  blister copper pour.
Blowing is commenced (416.5 SCFM average).  The bath temperature,
initially at 2,012°F, rises until it reaches 2,147°F, at this point
more flux is added, aiming at a slag assay of 24  percent silica
(Si02).
     The blowing continues until the temperature  reaches 2,300° to
2,372°F.  The first slag skim is made.   At this point, there is still
some iron sulfide remaining in the matte to impede excessive magnet-
ite formation.
     The second slag blow begins with the addition of 33 tons of
matte and more flux (at temperature of 2147°F).  Again some of the
iron sulfide is retained in the matte.   The slag  skim is made.  The
converter is skimmed 6 to 7 times and only in the last slag blow is
all the iron sulfide removed.
     After the slag blows are completed the copper blow begins.
Scrap copper and reject blister bars are added for temperature con-
trol.  When this blow is completed, a boat of flux (5.4 tons) is
added and the copper is poured.  The air flow is  about 450.1 SCFM

                                349

-------
during the copper blow.   The product is approximately 84.7 tons of
copper.
     The time required for this process is 11  hours and 10 minutes
per charge, including 6 hours and 10 minutes for slag blowing, one
hour and 50 minutes for copper blow, and 3 hours and 10 minutes of
down time.  This means blow time is 72 percent of the time required
per charging cycle.
     This is considered to represent a typical converter operation
as used in the copper industry.  Based on this, a basic model  for
estimating the S02 concentration and offgas volumes for converter
programming was proposed.  The following is a direct quote describing
the model used for programming:
     "The basic model for estimation of the SOp concentration  of the
converter exit gas has been derived by considering the applicable
thermodynamics, as given primarily in references [53-58],
     The nine chemical reactions shown in the Introduction form the
proposed model .  Based on the data presented by Schuhmann [53] and
Ruddle [54], the partial pressure of oxygen does not appear ample to
form appreciable amounts of Cu20 during the slag blows; therefore,
equation  (6) shall be neglected.  This was justified further by Ref-
erence [55].  The slag blow is then described by the following
equations:
     2FeS + 302 - ^2FeO + 2S02 + 223,880 Cal
     6FeO + 0  - ^2Fe°  + 151,800 Cal
     2FeO + Si02 - ^(2FeO) '  Si02 + 22,200 Cal
     FeS + 3Fe304 + 5Si02 - ^5[(FeO)2 •  Si02] + S02 + 4,760 Cal
By the same token, if caution is exercised not to overblow the white
metal-to-blister copper transition, relatively small amounts of Cu20
will form in the blister copper, and the copper blow is described by:
                               350

-------
          Cu2S + 02	*-2Cu + S02 + 183,600 Cal

     The following assumptions are made:

     1.  02 efficiency will be taken as 75 percent, defined as

          kg 09 consumed
              C.            •
          kg 02 blown

     2.  Charging sequence used at Ilo will be followed.  Ilo
         typically begins with six tons of flux used in the pre-
         vious charge for cooling the bath surface and getting a
         clean copper pour.

     3.  The iron (Fe) in the matte shall be assumed to go to
         80 percent FeO and 20 percent Fe304 in the slag.

     4.  Copper slag losses typically run from 3-5 percent, but
         these shall be ignored because of insufficient data on
         loss mechanisms.
     5.  A matte composition (weight, %) is assumed to be 35 per-
         cent Cu, 27 percent S, 32 percent Fe, 5 percent Fe~04,
         and 1 percent impurities (As, Bi, Pb, Sb, Se, Te).

     6.  The final Fe30, level in the slag approaches 25 percent
         (including the 5 percent from the matte).  This tacitly
         assumes that the reduction of Fe304 by FeS is equal to
         its production by oxidation of FeO.

     7.  The silica content of the slag is assumed to be 24-27
         percent.

     8.  Following the work of Korakas[593, the (wt % Fe)/(wt % Cu)
         in the matte will be 0.025 when all the slag blows are
         stopped (except final blow which removes all iron from
         matte).  This means that approximately 1 percent of Fe will
         remain until this final slag blow.

     9.  Impurities will be ignored quantitatively.

     Using these assumptions and keeping the 5-2-2-2-2-2-1 sequence
presented above in mind, calculations can be made using the

model.

     Materials/charge:

     Total charge = 16 ladles x 15.091
                               351

-------
                = 241,456 kg/charge
Total Cu/charge = (241,456) x (0.35) * 84,509 kg/charge
Total Fe/charge = (241,456) x (0.32) = 77,265 kg/charge
Total S/charge  = (241,456) x (0.27) = 65,193 kg/charge
Total Impurity/charge = 2,415 kg/charge
Consider now the first slag blow.  This blow processes 5/16 of
the charge or
          5/16 x 241,456 kg - 75,455 kg
          Cu =  26,409 kg
          Fe = 241,456 kg
          S  =  20,373 kg
       Fe304 =   3,773 kg
     Impurities =  775 kg
Remembering that the blow will be stopped when wt % Fe (matte)
                                               wt % Cu
» 0.025, 23,485.2 kg of Fe will be converted to FeO and Fe304 in
the ratio of 80 percent to 20 percent respectively, and 13,483.8
kg of S will be converted to S02.  This leaves 660.2 kg Fe and
6,988.8 kg S in the matte.  Therefore, 18,788 kg of Fe are used
to produce FeO, and 4,597 kg are used to produce Fe304.  From
this it can be seen that the slag contains 24,172 kg of F«0 and
6,491 kg of Fe^O. plus the 3,773 kg which was in the matte origin-
ally, for a total of 10,264 kg of Fe-jO^.  The flux remaining in
the converter from the previous copper pour is 5,455 kg (66 per-
cent Si02), yielding 3,600 kg of Si02.  In order to produce a slag
of 25 percent Si02 additional flux must be added.
              	 .66 X    	  _ n nr
          (24,171.7 + 10,264) + x  ~ u<"
          x = 20,997 kg flux
          20,997 - 3,600 = 17,397 kg flux
                            352

-------
The first slag skim will remove approximately the following amount
of material:
          34,436    (FeO + Fe304)
          20,997    (flux)
          55,433    kg (material removed)
     Total oxygen requirement will equal the oxygen which combines
with Fe to form FeO and Fe304 and S to form S02 divided by the
efficiency, as follows:
           5,391    kg (from FeO formation)
           1,794    kg (from Fe304 formation)
          13,484    kg (from S02 formation)
          20,669    kg
          Total 02 required = -Jfyrp  - 27,559

Air is blown during the slag blows at 707.9 SCMM (25,000 SCF) or
148.7 SCMM (5,250 SCFM) of oxygen.  This is equal to 212.3 kg/min.
Therefore, it is seen that using air 27,559 kg/212.3 kg/min =
130 minutes are required for the first slag blow.  The S02 concen-
tration of offgases can be determined in the following manner.
The average S consumption during the 130 minute blow period is:
          13,484 kg/130 min = 103.7 kg/min
This S produces about 207.2 kg/min (72.5 SCMM) of S02 on the aver-
age.  The exit stream is, then:
          559.3  SCMM NZ
           37.3  SCMM 0
                       2
           72.5  SCMM S0
                        2
          669.1  SCMM Total
This produces average S02 concentrations on the order of 10.8
percent, or, with 100 percent dilution, 5.4 percent.
                              353

-------
     Consider now the copper blow.  Neglecting the addition of
concentrates and scrap copper used for temperature control , the
converter contains only the white metal (all iron removed on last
slag blow).  The slag has been skimmed.
     Material in Converter:
          84,509 kg CU
          21,322 kg S
     Material Converted:
          21 ,322 kg S
     Oxygen Required:
          (21,322 x 32)7(32.064 x 0.75) = 28,372 kg of 02
     Blow Time Using 40% 02:
          28,372/437 = 65 min
     Rate S Consumption:
          40% 02:          =328.1 kg/rain
     S02 Production:
          40% 02:  655.6 kg/mi n =  229.4 SCMM
     S02 Concentrations (No Infiltration):
          40% 02:  28.1%
     S02 Concentration (with 100% Infiltration):
          40% 02:  14.4% "

     Scheduling of multiple converters has been examined.   The
S02 vs time for a single converter is shown in Figure H-l  using
the assumptions of the simple model  presented.  Based on the
                               354

-------
cu

(O
     o

 CXJ  U-
o
GO   
     
                                                                                                    O  O
                                                                                                    r- CO

                                                                                                     S-  C7)
                                                                                                     
                                                                                                    •i—
                                                                                                     X.
                                         WW3S  '31V«  SV9 11X3
                                                355

-------
calculations, five converters would be necessary to have one
converter in the copper blow at all times.
      Figure H-2 shows the scheduling for three converters
and Figure H-l is an indication of the percent SC^ at the outlet
by joining the offgases of the three converters.  Figure H-l
also  shows the flow rate fluctuations during the operations.
These figures reflect conditions after 100 percent infiltration.
Based on the figure, exit gas flow rate varies from 1,416 to
4,361 SCMM; S02 concentration (vol percent dry) varies from
5.4 to 7.8."
      Using the above model as a guide, a converter program was
carried out based on the blowing times as given above.  The con-
verter program thus used in this study is presented in Figure H-2.
Initially S02 concentrations of 7.8 and 5.4 percent were used for
the copper and slag blows, respectively, as used in the basic
model.  Similarly volumes of 52,000 and 50,000 SCFM were used for
the copper and slag blows, respectively.  The resulting gas char-
acteristics versus time were similar to those obtained by the model
      The values originally obtained for the base smelter system,
Appendix Y-l, proposed converter offgas averaging 5.7 percent S02
at 64,500 SCFM for the smelter system under consideration.  This
implied each converter produced an offgas of approximately 30,000
SCFM.  Also, the average gas characteristics are maintained from a
sulfur balance based on 1,400 TPD concentrate.
      For this study, gas characteristics between the two values
are used.  Thus 40,000 SCFM for the slag blow and 42,000 SCFM for
the copper blow are considered representative for converter off-
gases.  Since there are three converters, the average number
blowing at any one time is two.  Therefore, 82,000 SCFM is used as
the average converter offgas volume.  A sulfur balance indicates
that  4.5 percent S02 at 82,000 SCFM corresponds well  with the 5.7
percent S02 at 64,500 SCFM.   Finally, the S02 concentrations were
adjusted to give the average S0« concentration of 4.5 percent.
                                356

-------
 *    ,2
 O    CO

CO    S_
      OJ
 en   Q-
 (C    O.
i—    O
co    o
                                                                             o
                                                                             o
                                                                             VO
o
s
                                                                             o
                                                                             CM
                                                                             O
                                                                             VO
                                                                             CO
                                                                             O
                                                                             O
                                                                             CO
                                                                             O
                                                                             «*
                                                                             CM
CO
                                                                                    8
                                                                                     s-
                                                                                     o
       o
       CO
       o
                                                                                     o

                                                                                    CO
                                                                                     o
       o
       CO
       o
       o
       o
                                                                                    CM
                                                                                     en
                                                                              O     (O
                                                                              CO    i—
                                                                              •—    CO


                                                                                     o
                CO
                
-------
     The actual  values used in this study are shown in Figure H-3 and
H-4 while numerical  values are presented in Table H-l.  As can be seen,
the SCL concentration varies from 4.0 to 6.6 percent while the flow
rates vary from 40,000 to 122,000 SCFM.
     These values appear to be more representative of current operating
practice corresponding to data reported  from actual copper converters
using efficient hooding and offgas systems.
     This adjusted model seems feasible  even for processed ores con-
taining high impurity levels of As, Sb,  Pb, and Zn.  Assuming that
there are still  traces of these impurities in the matte, the longer
slag blowing times are around 1,200°C will insure removal prior to
the blister forming blow.  Thus, oxygen  enrichment for the copper blow
should not affect the final copper quality since these impurities
will be removed during the slag blows.
                               358

-------
SCFM
xlOOO
                                                                   LI
        30  60  90  120 150 180 210 240  270 300 330 360  390 420 450 480  510 540  570 600  630 660
                                  TIME (MIN)
              Figure  H-3.  Converter Offgas Volume vs  Time
                      Characteristics for Programming
                                      359

-------
6.6
                                   '   i

 5.7
5.4
                                   II
4.0
    0 30   60  90  120 150 180  210 240  270 300 330 360  390 420 450 480  510 540 570 600 630 660
                                    TIME  (MIN)
                   Figure H-4.   Converter %S02 Offgas
                     Characteristics  for Programming
                                     360

-------
Table H-l.   CONVERTER OFFGAS VOLUME AND S02 PROFILES
02 and no 02 Enrichment
Time
(M1n)
5
15
11
14
40
10
15
9
10
20
5
7
10
5
10
20
29
5
5
4
24
15
25
10
Percent
(so2)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.6
5.7
5.4
5.7
5.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Volume
(SCFM)
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
40,000
42,000
82,000
122,000
82,000
122,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
120,000
80,000
120,000
Time
(Min)
25
15
10
11
14
5
20
10
25
5
16
14
15
9
26
19
5
19
5
5
29
20
10
5
Percent
(so2)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.4
5.7
5.4
5.7
5.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.4
5.7
6.6
5.7
Volume
(SCFM)
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
122,000
82,000
122,000
82,000
122,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
120,000
80,000
40,000
80,000
120,000
122,000
82,000
42,000
82,000
                         361

-------
                         APPENDIX I
        CONVERTER SLAG RETURN:  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

      More and more smelters are weighing the economic advantages and
disadvantages of returning converter slag to the reverberatories.  For
those smelters which have been plagued by magnetite and its build-up
in furnace bottoms or hearths and copper entrainment in furnace slags,
the eliminatfon of the magnetite source in the converter slag has re-
sulted in much improved furnace conditions.  Some smelters, generally
using green feed, have been able to practice magnetite control in the
furnaces and still prefer the return of hot converter slag to the fur-
naces.
      Among the advantages of converter slag return to reverberatories
 are  (13):
      a.  Retention of latent heat in converter slag for addition to
          furnace heat reserve.
      b.  Rapid chemo-thermal reaction of the slag constituents with
          the molten bath, resulting in an increased smelting rate.
      c.  Economic furnace separation of copper and precious metals
          in the converter slag while molten and their return to the
          matte in the furnace.
      d.  General economy of converter slag treatment and handling
          while still in the molten state.
      e.  Minimization of equipment involved in returning slag to the
          furnace as compared to the equipment required for the flo-
          tation process.  For example, the power requirement for
          crushing and grinding is approximately 40 KWH per ton.
      f.  Cheaper disposal of undesirable elements by their elimination
          in the reverberatory slag.
      g.  Assistance in maintaining an open flow channel in the furnace
          bath from the bridgewall to the skimming end, washing away
          "floaters" and charge bridges.  This is principally due to a
          slight rise in the bath elevation in the burner end when slag
                                362

-------
          is received and which is eventually transmitted down through
          the length of the furnace to the skimming bay.

      Among the advantages of not returning converter slag to the re-
verberator ies are:
      a.   Elimination of most build-up of magnetite in the reverb-con-
           verter system and  its many detrimental effects on hearth and
           bottoms,  higher slag losses, additional fluxing required,
           higher slag temperatures required for separation, etc.
           Note:  Part of the problem concerning magnetite is that
           there has been much difficulty encountered concerning rou-
           tine percent determination by analytical methods.  With
           the advent of modern laboratory equipment, this has become
           more rational and  it is found converter slags normally con-
           tain 40 to 50 percent Fe (an easy laboratory determination)
           and that a larger  percentage of the iron may be in the mag-
           netite form than formerly thought.  This can result in an
           analysis as high as 53 percent Fe30. in some cases.

      b.   Prevention of surges in gas flow at the furnace outlet,
           usually accompanied by increased S02 concentrations, caused
           by the rapid chemo-thermal reaction between the slag and
           the furnace bath.

      c.   The reduction of air infiltration from slag receiving-launder
           openings which causes undesirable cyclic presence of oxygen
           and reduction of S02 concentration in the furnace atmosphere.
           The volume of the  furnace exit gases is also increased by
           this excess infiltrated air, resulting in greater heat loss
           from the furnace.  Those problems are thus eliminated.

      d.   Elimination of the oftentimes excessive heat generation in
           the immediate contact area of converter slag and furnace
           bath, with accompanying splashing of the bath on bridge and
           sidewalls, causing damage to the brickwork.
      e.   Elimination of the higher labor and maintenance cost involved
           in the upkeep of slag return launders.  Usually one operative
           furnace crewmember is required solely for launder cleaning on
           each furnace shift as well as some mechanical maintenance re-
           quirements.
      f.   Elimination of the high capital, upkeep and replacement cost
           of equipment involved and even more so if retractable laun-
           ders are used.

      g.   Reduction of spillage of converter slag.  Spillage requires
           that more reverts  be smelted and that labor be involved in
           cleanup in the converter aisle.

      h.   Without slag return, fluxing requirements to treat the mag-
           netite are lower resulting in less material passing through

                                363

-------
the furnace.   Also,  less reyerberatory slag is produced (only
half) and cost of disposal  is proportionately lower.   This
results in lower copper-pound loss due to the decreased vol-
ume.  In some locations the percentage of copper loss in the
furnace slag  is higher than normal, mainly due to the presence
of excess magnetite.   Copper content of furnace slags without
converter slag returns have decreased as much as 0.2  percent.
                      364

-------
                             APPENDIX J

        OXYGEN ENRICHMENT EXPERIENCE AT THE CALETONES SMELTER

     Experimental work on the use of oxygen in green feed reverbera-
tory furnaces was started at the Caletones smelter in Chile in 1971.
This development work was continued through to 1976.  During this
time, a gradual transition was made from supplying fuel convention-
ally through air-oil burners at the end of the furnace to totally
through oxygen-fuel burners positioned over the furnace area and sus-
pended from the roof.
     Eventually one furnace was converted to 12 oxy-fuel burners
installed through the roof of the furnace so that the flame impacted
on the charge banks.  A total of 380 long tons per day of oxygen
allowed a smelting rate of 1,520 dry tons per day with decreased fuel
consumption in the range of 0.81 x 10  Kcal.

    Matte grade tended to increase from 38 percent copper before
major use of oxygen enrichment to 49 percent  copper with full  oxygen
usage.   Copper in the slag reduced from 1 percent without oxygen
enrichment to 0.7 percent with full  oxygen.   Another additional
effect with the slag was noted that because of its higher temperature,
it was possible to eliminate calcium carbonate used as flux (approxi-
mately 4 percent of the charge).  The increase in matte temperature
also minimized the furnace bottom buildup with magnetite.  The
smelting level and production increased significantly to values  over
100 percent of those with no oxygen enrichment.

     The most significant result from a pollution control standpoint
was that the S0? concentration range in the offgases increased to
                                365

-------
5.8 - 7.3 percent.   This is sufficiently high, of course, to allow
direct processing of the gases in a sulfuric acid plant.
     It was necessary to use a bottom ventilation system when full
oxygen was used for this reverberatory furnace.   However, furnace
wear on a per-ton of copper basis was either less or the same as
previously encountered.
                                366

-------
                            APPENDIX K-l
  PROCESS DESIGN FOR DIRECT PROCESSING OF REVERBERATORY FURNACE GASES
                         by Tim J. Browder
                      Tim J. Browder Company

K.I  GENERAL
     The Browder reverberatory furnace gas sulfuric acid plant is
designed in this study to produce 192.6 short tons per day of sul-
furic acid (based on 100% H2S04) for each 1.0% of S02 in the feed
stream entering the S02 converter when operated at a maximum flow rate
of 170,000 Nm3/hr (100,000 SCFM) of dry gas to the converter.  Assumed
characteristics of the reverberatory furnace effluent are:
          Volume Flow Rat
          0.5% to 1.5% SO
Volume Flow Rate - 170,000 Nm3/hr (100,000 SCFM)
                        J2
          2.0 - 9.0% C02
          0.03% SO,
                 '3
                 ).
          Balance N
4.0 - 20.0% H20
                   2
          Acid plant emission SOp = 450 ppm (maximum)
          Assume acid plant adjacent to reverberatory furnace
          Altitude 1525 meters (5,000 ft.)
          Gas temperature out of reverberatory furnace 1200°C (2200°F)
          Gas temperature out of W.H.B. 400°C (750°F)
          Dust Load 50 grain/SCF
     Figure K-l presents the flow system.   Metallurgical  feed gas
containing a weak stream of S02, 02> COp and N2 and some  acid mist
in the presence of water vapor is collected from the exit side of a
reverberatory furnace gas hot Cottrell  precipitator and is conveyed
in a gas flue to a humidifying tower.  The humidifying tower humidi-
fies and cools the gas and removes some of the particulate matter.
The gas next passes to a washing tower in which further cooling of the
                                367

-------
                                  ->
                                  u
                                I
                                0 o
                                0 U
                                           i   "
                                           s *» =».
                                           it*
                                           8 J i

                                           K sS
                                           W " -5

                                           8.So'
                                           O •;  E
                                              O e
                                           X  o. o
                                           —    «n
                                          cn

                                          < M
                                          o «


                                          >• Ul
                                          (E (/)
o:
ui
m
cc
ui

ui
                                          u.
                                          o
                                          ui !Z

                                          x<
                                          W -I
                                          ^ o-

                                          So
                                          o
                                          Uj g

                                          u. cr
                                          (O
                              I
363

-------
 gas is accomplished by recycled cool  liquor contacting the counter-
 current flow of gas leaving the humidifying tower.   After being washed
 to remove a large portion of the dust and some sulfuric acid mist,  the
 gas passes to the wet ESP (electrostatic mist precipitators).
      The gas passes from the mist precipitators to  a series of
 condensers.  In the first series of condensers, the gas is indirectly
 cooled in the condenser tubes using cooling water.   The second
 series of condensers has a closed circuit refrigeration unit whereby
 chilled water is used to further condense the water vapor from the
 gas in order to achieve water balance before passing to the acid
 plant's drying tower.
      The clean refrigerated gas, with the proper moisture content
(water balance), then flows through the drying tower which removes
the remaining moisture from the gas.  The drying tower gas is then
passed through a two-stage demister on the top of the drying tower
and then flows to one operating (of two installed) main gas blower.
The gas blower propels the gas through the plant to  finally accom-
plish the manufacture of sulfuric acid.
      The gas is next heated in order to be able to  pass to the
converter.  The preheating of this gas is accomplished in two
stages.  The blower discharged gas is passed first into the top
vestibule of a cold gas heat exchanger flowing down  through the tubes.
This gas is indirectly heated by a counter-current stream of hot gas
leaving the converter.  The gas which has then been  preheated in
the cold heat exchanger next flows to a hot heat exchanger before
passing to the converter.  The gas is thus indirectly heated to the
converter catalyst ignition temperature in the hot heat exchanger
with a stream of hot gas.  The temperature of this gas is controlled
by mixing reverberatory furnace offgas from upstream and downstream
of the waste heat boiler.  Mixing is accomplished in the jug damper
 (Figure  K-2).  The hot preheated  gas at approximately 438°C  (820°F)
 next passes  into a multi-stage converter.  The converter  processes
 the S02  to  SOg.  The  gas  leaving  the converter stages is  cooled as
 required  before passing back  into additional catalyst stages.
                                 369

-------
             y*5 \ ' ££
-------
From the final catalyst bed, the gas is then passed to the shell
side of the cold heat exchanger where the gas is cooled to approxi-
mately 440°F before entering the Freon superheater and then flows
to the absorption tower.  The absorption tower absorbs the SO.,
from the gas and the remaining gas is then passed through a high
efficiency demister (mist eliminator) and then vented to the
atmosphere through an exhaust stack.

K.I.I  GAS CLEANING
K.I. 1.1  General
     Reverberatory gas which has been passed through the rever-
beratory furnace waste heat boilers and through a hot Cottrell to
remove some of the particulate matter is diverted by a new damper
installed in the main line to the humidifying tower.  The gas
is conducted through a carbon steel duct, which is externally
insulated with rockwool blanket insulation, to the humidifying
tower.  The humidifying tower is a carbon steel vertical mounted
vessel with conical bottom containing teflon and polypropylene
linings.  Inside of these linings are placed acid-proof brick lin-
ing unless the gas contains fluorine, then carbon brick will be
substituted.  The inlet nozzle of the tower which is close to the
tower base and above the conical bottom is water jacketed and cooled
in order to prevent stress problems from occuring in the steel shell.
The hot gas enters this humidifying tower at approximately 370-400°C
(700-750°F) through the gas nozzle, and turns and flows up through
the empty tower.  The tower shell contains a series of spray nozzles
through which weak acidic recycled liquor is sprayed into the tower
counter-current to the gas flow stream.  This spraying of the
liquor into the tower evaporates some of the water into the gas
stream thereby humidifying the gas and reducing the temperature
to approximately 66-68°C (150-155°F).  The top dome of this tower
also contains spray nozzles and emergency spray nozzles which are
used in case of power or pump failure.  These emergency spray
nozzles allow the towers to have water sprayed continuously to

                                371

-------
prevent damage to the tower in case there is  a  power failure.   The
gas leaving the top of the tower is then conveyed down  through
fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) duct in where there is  a  swirler
knockout to reduce the mechanical  water droplet carryover from  the
humidifying tower.  The gas then enters a washing tower for further
cooling and further removal of dust and acid  mist.   The gas which
has been cooled to approximately 66-68°C (150-155°F), then  flows
up through the washing tower which contains 3-1/2 x 3 1/2 inch
plastic (PPE) Pall Rings.   Over this tower is circulated weak
recycled cooled liquor which accomplishes further scrubbing (wash-
ing) of the gas to remove  particulate matter, and acid  mist which
is present in the gas, before passing to the  wet electrostatic
acid mist.
      The down flowing acidic liquor leaving  the washing tower  is
pumped through a series of Carbate coolers to remove the heat that
has been recovered in the  washing tower.  This  heat removal occurs
as a result of water vapor being condensed from the gas. This  water
vapor has previously been  added to the gas as a result  of humidifi-
cation in the previous humidifying tower,

K.I.1.2  Acid Mist Precipitators

      The scrubbed, humidified and washed process gas then  passes
through the acid mist precipitator system. The electrostatic type
acid precipitators are comprised of lead tubes  with a lead  covered
electrical charging wire located in the center  of each  tube.  The
processed gas passes up through the annular space between the cen-
ter wire and the tube.  Liquid acid droplets  and particles
are electrostatically charged and are collected on the  inner
surface of the tube and drained to the bottom of the precipitators.
The acid mist precipitators are equipped with water sprays  which
may be used to clean the precipitator tubes while the plant is  in
 operation.   Effluent is then  directed  to  an  acidic  disposal system
 outside  of the  battery  limits  of  the  plant.
                                372

-------
K.I.1.3  Gas Dehumidification by Cooling
     The clean process gas then flows to two sets of condensers.
The gas leaving the acid mist precipitators is conveyed in an FRP
duct into the top section of the condensers.  The condensers are
vertical shell and tube Carbate units in which the saturated gas
enters the top FRP vestibule flowing down through the Carbate
tubes.  Cooling is accomplished in the first set of condensers
using cooling water recycled from a cooling tower outside of the
plant's battery limits.  The gas is then collected in the bottom
vestibule of the first set of condensers and condensate is separated
from the gas.  The gas is then conveyed through an FRP duct and to
the second bank of condensers.  The second bank of condensers
contains a closed circuit refrigeration unit in which chilled
water is used to further reduce the gas temperature in the
condensers to approximately 70C (45°F) before passing to the
drying tower in the sulfuric acid plant.

K.I.2  REVERBERATORY FURNACE SULFURIC ACID PLANT
K.I.2.1  Drying Tower
     The clean wet feed gas from the gas cleaning plant is now
drawn to a packed drying tower over which 94% sulfuric acid is
circulated in order to completely dry the gas.  The dry SOp gas
leaves the drying tower through a two stage demister (mist elimi-
nator) located in the top of the drying tower.  The 94% sulfuric
acid for the drying tower is supplied from the drying tower sump
and flows by gravity to the drying tower pump tank from which it
is recirculated by an acid pump to the top of the drying tower
weirs from the drying tower acid coolers.  Since the acid in the
drying tower is continuously being diluted, the strength of this
acid is maintained by cross-transfering the required amount of
strong 98.5% acid from the absorption tower system to the drying
tower pump tank.  The change of level that results from the cross-
transfer is controlled automatically by level control instrumentation
and valving.
                                373

-------
K.I.2.2  Drying Tower Demister
     The drying tower demister consists of two horizontal  pads of
teflon media supported by CA-20 grids.   These horizontal  pads are
located in a chamber mounted directly on top of the drying tower.
The purpose of these demisters is to eliminate any acid mist carry-
over from the drying tower and to protect the blower and the remain-
ing down stream equipment in the acid plant from corrosion.

K.I.2.3  Main Gas Blower
     The clean-dry process gas which has been pulled through the
system and through the drying tower demisters now enters one of two
main gas blowers (one blower being a spare).  These blowers supply
the necessary pressure for the gas to flow through the remaining
equipment in the acid plant.  The suction and discharge lines of the
blowers are carbon steel ducts which are normally only painted
externally and not insulated.  The gas then flows from the blower
into the heat exchangers, to be preheated to allow the gas to obtain
the proper catalyst ignition temperature, before being passed to
the converter system.

K.I.2.4  Cold Heat Exchanger
     The cold heat exchanger is a vertical carbon steel vessel
mounted on steel grillage.  The blower discharge gas enters the
top vestibule of this cold heat exchanger flowing down through the
tubes thereby being preheated in a counter-current flow with hot
gas exiting the last stage of the converter which is passed on
the shell side across the tubes of the heat exchanger.  The gas
leaves this heat exchanger and then flows to a shell side of the
hot heat exchanger.  This entire cold heat exchanger is constructed
of carbon steel plate with internal aluminized parts and contains
a top and bottom tube sheet with the necessary carbon steel tubes.
Additional service life can be obtained from this heat exchanger
by using Alonized tubes.  This heat exchanger is insulated with
two inches of rockwool  insulation on the outside, and in addition
                                374

-------
contains weather seal protection.   The blower discharge duct lead-
ing into the top vestibule of this heat exchanger is carbon steel.
The hot gas leaving the lower vestibule of this cold heat exchanger
passes into a duct which is aluminized, and the gas is conveyed
through this duct over to the hot heat exchanger.

K.I.2.5  Hot Heat Exchanger
     The hot heat exchanger is a specially designed vertical unit
which allows the gas which has been previously heated in the cold
heat exchanger to flow on the shell side of the hot heat exchanger
up across a series of tubes, leaving the top of the shell side of
the heat exchanger and then flowing to the converter.  This gas is
heated counter-currently with mixed hot gas exiting the reverberatory
furnace and waste heat boilers.   The top vestibule of this heat
exchanger contains refractory to protect the heat exchanger from
extremely high temperature which can be encountered on startup
since this unit is also used as a preheater during startup
operations.  This heat exchanger has a special bottom vestibule
with a conical bottom and contains the tubes extended out approxi-
mately six feet beyond the lower tube sheet to act as knockouts
for any course dust which is conveyed down through the pipes.  The
conical bottom of the heat exchanger acts as a collection device and
contains two double weighted valves to remove any dust which settles
out in the bottom of this conical  hopper.  The heated gas is then
conveyed to the converter.  This is accomplished in a carbon steel
duct externally insulated and internally aluminized.

K.I.2.6  Converter
     The previously preheated clean dry process gas enters the
top bed of the converter and passes down through a series of
vanadium pentoxide catalyst beds.   The process gas, after being
heated as a result of the exothermic reaction that takes place in
the catalyst bed, leaves the converter chamber and passes externally
to the horizontally-mounted gas cooler on the side of the converter.

                                375

-------
The gas, after passing across the tubes of this gas cooler,  returns
to an additional catalyst bed and then flows through this bed where
further conversion takes place with some slight temperature  rise.
The gas from other successive beds may also be heated as a result of
this exothermic reaction and cooling with gas coolers as required.
Gas finally leaves the bottom of the converter and flows to  the lower
shell side of the previously mentioned cold heat exchanger.
      The catalyst bed design considerations must include the con-
ditions generated by the plant duty cycle.  Turn down ratio of
170,000 Nm /hr (100,000 SCFM) system design herein may be as low
as 40% over a range of SOp concentration from 0% to 2.5%.
Reverberatory furnace S02 emission concentration will vary in rela-
tion to charge frequency with maximum S02 occurring at the time the
charge is dropped.  Some furnaces have been known to generate peak
S02 concentrations considerably above 2.5% but usually for only
periods of 2 to 5 minutes.
      The large duct volumes downstream of the furnace will  tend
to mix the high concentration to more nearly the average values
of 0.5 to>1.5%.  The catalyst tends to adsorb S02 and will serve
as a "sink" under short term peak conditions to minimize acid
plant peak emissions.  The catalyst and steel in the converter
and associated ductwork will serve as a thermal "sink" to mini-
mize temperature peaks so that the heat exchanger system opera-
tion will not be effected to any great extent.  If,  despite  the
above, S02 surges do effect the plant operation, additional
catalyst  can be added  (it should be noted that a large extra
quantity  has been included in the present design to provide an
operating margin).
     The  converter is  a vertical carbon steel vessel mounted on
steel grillage  beams and contains a dish top head.  The  internal
beds of the converter  are supported by a vertical cast  iron post.
Each catalyst  bed consists of catalyst and  quartz,  and  is supported
on  triangular  cast iron grid sections which  in turn are  supported
by the  cast  iron  post.  The  internal  surface of  the converter  is

                                376

-------
completely aluminized to protect the converter shell  from scaling.
The external surface of the converter contains four inches of rock-
wool blanket insulation and is protected from the weather by weather
seal.

K.I.2.7  Absorption Tower
     The SO, gas, after leaving the final  stage of the converter,
passes to the shell side of the cold heat  exchanger.   The con-
verter exit gas is cooled by the blower discharge gas inside the
tubes of the cold heat exchanger.  The gas at approximately
221-227°C (430-440°F) is then passed to the Freon superheater and
then to the absorption tower.  The SCL is  removed in  the absorption
tower by 98.5% sulfuric acid continuously  recycled over this tower
and down through the packing.  The acid leaves the bottom of the
absorption tower and flows to an acid pump tank.   From the pump
tank, the acid is conveyed by one of two installed pumps (one
being a spare), and conveyed to the acid coolers  to remove the
heat generated in the tower before the acid flows back to the top
of the absorption tower.  The absorption tower is similar to the
drying tower and contains cast iron acid distributors.

K.I.2.8  Absorption Tower Demister
     The top of the absorption tower contains a high  efficiency
demister, usually a York type SA.  This unit will remove any acid
mist which has been formed previously in the system and return it
as droplets to the absorption tower to be  recovered.

K.I.2.9  Stack
     The residual gas leaving the absorption tower is conveyed in
a carbon steel duct leading to a vent or exhaust  stack.  The gas
is then discharged to the atmosphere.  The S02 concentration of
this gas will be less than 300 parts per million  at all times when
initially starting with 1% SO,, gas.  The gas, however, may be ducted
back to the original flue and put into the main exhaust stack for
                                377

-------
the smelter if required.

K.I.2.10  Acid Pump Tanks and Pumps
     In order to maintain sufficient acid quantity and to main-
tain the required strength in both the drying and absorption tower
system, pump tanks are included.   The pump tanks serve as a surge
volume and also contain the acid  which will be recirculated over
the towers.  The drying tower pump tank contains two acid pumps.
One pump is a spare.  The acid flows from the towers into the pump
tanks.  The acid is then pumped through a cast iron pipe to the
acid coolers and from the acid coolers back to the tops of the
towers.  The absorption tower pump tank is similar in design to
the drying tower pump tank.

K.I.2.11  Acid Cooler System
     Each acid system contains a  separate pump tank and recircu-
lating pumps as well as separate  acid coolers.  The acid cooler
system consists of a horizontal stainless steel  shell and tube
unit.  The acid flows through the tube side of the acid cooler
and Freon is on the shell side.

K.I.2.12  Acid Product Transfer and Drain
     Product acid is pumped to OBL (outside battery limits) and
into an acid storage area.  The product pump also serves as a spare
for the drain pump which may be used to drain and pump acid from the
system for servicing or for maintenance.

K.2  OUTSIDE BATTERY LIMITS (OBL) PLANT FACILITIES
K.2.1  COOLING TOWER
     A three cell double cross-flow cooling tower is designed to
accommodate the cooling loads for the weak acid scrubber system,
the coolers for the drying and absorption tower systems, the con-
densers and refrigeration unit for the plant.  The cooling tower is
                               378

-------
normally not considered a portion of the process part of the acid
plant and is usually therefore outside battery limits (OBL) of the
plant.   The cooling tower is usually constructed of wood and mounted
on a concrete water sump base.  The cooling water after accomplishing
its function of cooling various components in the plant is pumped
while still under pressure to the top of the cooling tower and flows
down a series of grids to the bottom of the tower.   Air is conveyed
through the bottom of the tower and flows crosswise to a center
phleum section and vented out through propellers mounted on the top
of the cooling tower.

K.2.2  COOLING WATER PUMPS
     The cooling water pumps are mounted in a sump adjacent to
the cooling tower.  There are three cooling water pumps, normally
two in operation, with one spare.  The two pumps circulate the
cooling water from the base of the cooling tower through the respec-
tive acid coolers, refrigeration unit, condenser, and weak acid
coolers.  The water is then returned to the top of the cooling tower.

K.2.3  PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS, LOADING PUMPS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT
     The processed loading system tanks and other units are normally
outside of the battery limits of a sulfuric acid facility and many
times are not included in the process design since many companies
already have acid storage systems.

K.3  PROCESS GUARANTEES
     Sulfuric acid plants are usually guaranteed based on the
production of sulfuric acid for a fixed gas flow and for a fixed
percent gas strength.  For varying gas flows and varying gas
strengths, the usual design then encompasses the maximum gas flow
and the maximum gas strength in order to establish the required
quantity of catalyst to be charged to the converter.  The rever-
beratory furnace gas sulfuric acid plant which, for this analysis,
contains a maximum of 1.5% SOo is based on a design total gas flow
                                379

-------
rate of 170,000 m3/hr (100,000 CFM)  which requires  about  165,000
liters of catalyst.   A catalyst manufacturer would  supply the cata-
lyst guaranteed based on the gas flows,  pressures,  altitude and
operating conditions both in flow and SOp concentration of the
gases.  Appendix K-3 includes a typical  computer run showing these
calculations, the stack gas analysis, and the required catalyst
loading and operating temperatures for such an installation.
     Under the conditions of the design  of reverberatory  furnace
gas plants, it is very easy to obtain stack gas effluent  of less
than 450 parts per million in most cases and with low gas strengths
the stack gas could be as low as 50 parts per million with a single
contact system.

K.4  MECHANICAL DESIGN
K.4.1  GENERAL
     This section presents a brief description of mechanical  de-
sign, major equipment and supplementary facilities proposed for
the reverberatory gas sulfuric acid plant.  The design data repre-
sented herein and included in Appendix K-2 are based on the plant
operated at an average flow of 170,000 Nm3/hr (100,000 SCFM) of
clean dry gas entering the sulfuric acid plant converter and when
supplied with all utilities and materials required at the use con-
dition with the proper proportion of sulfur dioxide, oxygen, and
water.  Design, fabrication and installation of the equipment and
facilities is in accordance with the standard practices of the sul-
furic acid industry and OSHA standards.   A material list is in-
cluded in Table K-l and utility requirements are summarized in
Table K-2.
                                380

-------
                             TABLE K-l
                     REVERBERATORY FURNACE GAS
                        SULFURIC ACID PLANT
                          (100,000 SCFM)
                          EQUIPMENT LIST
ITEM NO.

  Towers

T-1101
T-1102


T-1103
T-1104
T-1105
SERVICE
Humidifying Tower
Washing Tower


Drying Tower
Absorption Tower
Lime Silo
DESCRIPTION
18 - 0" dia. x 40'0"
with Cone Bottom,
Carbon Steel, Teflon,
Ppe and Carbon Brick-
lining.

22' - 0" x 36' - 0"
High, FRP

20 - 0" dia. x 25' -
0" High, C.S., Teflon,
and Acid Proof Brick-
lined. Double Gas In-
let Nozzles

20 - 0" dia. x 25' -
0" High,C.S., Teflon,
and Acid Proof Brick-
lined. Double Gas In-
let Nozzles

61 - 0" dia. x 30' -
0" High, C.S. with 5
HP feed screw
  Heat Exchangers
    & Coolers
HE-1301
Cold H.E.
4,000 1 1/2" dia.
tubes, 10 BWG,
                                381

-------
ITEM NO.
      Table K-l  (continued)

SERVICE
He-1302
HE-1303



HE-1304



HE-1305


HE-1306



HE-1307



HE-1308



HE-1309

HE-1310
Hot H.E.
Weak Acid Coolers
Condensers
(Water Cooled)
Condensers
(Refrigeration)

Drying Tower
Cooler
Absorber Cooler



Product Acid Cooler



Superheater

Converter Gas Cooler
DESCRIPTION

C.S. 30' - 0" long.
Shell 13' - 6"

1,000 - 3" dia. tubes,
14 BW6 C.S., 30' - 0"
Long, Shell, 12-0"
dia.  (Stainless Steel
Tubes)

Impervious Graphite
Tubes 7/8" I.D., Steel
Shells, 12,000 Sq. Ft.

Impervious Graphite
Tubes 7/8" I.D., Steel
Shells - 24,400 Sq. Ft.

S.S. Tubes - Steel
Shell - 16,700 Sq. Ft.

Chemetics - 500 Sq.
Ft. S.S., Anodically
Protected

Chemetics - 2,100  Sq.
Ft. S.S., Anodically
Protected

Chemetics - 200 Sq.
Ft. S.S., Anodically
Protected

3000 Sq. Ft.

2750 Sq. Ft.
  Pump & Drives

P-1501A&B


P-1502A&B


P-1503A&B
Humidifying Tower
(2)

Washing Tower Pumps
(2)

Drying Tower Pump
 3,600  GPM  -  100' TDH
 200  HP

 5,500  GPM  -  150' TDH
 350  HP

 Lewis  Size 7,  -
 2,000  GPM
 100  HP
                                382

-------
ITEM NO.

P-1504A&B



P-1505A&B


P-1506A&B
P-1507 A,B,
       & C
      Table K-l (continued)

SERVICE                      DESCRIPTION
Absorber Pump



Product & Drain


Neutralization Tank (2)


Cooling Water Pumps
Lewis Size 7, 2,000
GPM
100 HP

200 GPM, 120' TDH,
15 HP

200 GPM, 100 TDH,
10 HP

7,000 GPM, 130'  TDH,
250 HP
  Cooling Towers

CT-1701          Cooling Tower
                             13,000 GPM,  190 MM
                             BTU/Hr.  (106.2  - 77°F.)
                             150 HP
  Blowers

B-1801 A,B,
Main Gas Blowers
100,000 SCFM, 7.03
psi delta P, 4,500
HP Each
  Tanks

TK-l901


TK-1902


TK-1903



TK-1904



TK-1905
Humidifying Tower
Pump Tank

Seal Pot
Drying Tower Pump Tank
Absorber Pump Tank
Neutralization Pit (Tank)
20' - 0" and 14'  -
0" x 10 Deep

6' - 0" dia. x 5' •
0" Deep

22' - 0" dia. x 8'
deep Teflon & A.P.
bricklined

22' - 0" dia. x 8'
deep Teflon & A.P.
brick-lined

16' - 0" x 16' -
0" x 10' deep
                               383

-------
                        Table K-l  (continued)
ITEM NO.
  Reactors

R-2501
SERVICE
Converter
                             DESCRIPTION
                             40'  - 0"  dia.  x 48'
                             0" High,  4 Catalyst
                             Beds
  Separation Equipment
S-2801

S-2802
A, B, C, D,
E & F

S-2803
S-2804


S-2805
Gas Liquid Separator FRP - Integral  in Duct

Electrostatic P
(Each 2 Series)


Drying Tower Demister
Electrostatic Precipitators  158 tubes x 17'  -
                             0" dia.  3 Parallel  =
                             6 Total
                             18'  - 0" dia.  - 2
                             Stage 1  - 18'  dia.  pad
                             & 1-16'  dia.  pad
Absorber Demister


Neutralization Tank Mixer    3 HP
                             York Type S,17'  -
                             0" dia.
  Stack

ST-2901          Stack
  Refrigeration
     Cooler

RC-3101, A,B.C.  Water Chillers
RC - 3101, A,B,  Water Chillers
           & C
F-3101
Preheater Furnace
                             12' - 0" dia. x 149' -
                             0" High Self Standing-
                             Spoilers at Top 20'
                             York, Open
                             Turbopak - 3
                             Units (1500 Tons
                             Total)

                             York, Open
                             Turbopak - 3
                             Units (1,500 Tons
                             Total)

                             6' x 20'
                             Bricklined
                                384

-------
                             TABLE K-2
                             UTILITIES
REVERBERATORY FURNACE GAS
SULFURIC ACID PLANT
(100,000 SCFM GAS FLOW)

Sulfuric Acid Plant
                   REV = 0
                   9-30-76
Case I

Name
Lime Silo Feed Screw
Humidifying Tower Circ. Pump
(Spare)
Washing Tower Circulating Pump
(Spare)
Neutralization Tk. Pumps (Sump)
(Spare)
ESP - Seals Fans
Drying Tower Pump & Spare
Absorption Pump & Spare
Main Gas Blower
(Spare)
^t" A y*"f~ — ti n 1 iihi* Piimnc iMj^in RTnwpv*)
(Spare)
Drain (Product) Pump
(Spare)
Blower Room Exhauster
Utility Air Compressor
6 Mist Precipitators
Acid Plant (No Control Room,
No Lights, No Cooling Tower)
(A)
Normal Average
(Acid Plant)
Motor List
Connected
5
200
200
350
350
10
10
(3) 3/Each
100 (2)
100 (2)
4,500
4,500
in
1 U
10
15
15
2
20
10,606 HP
(3) 50 KVA/
Each
Connected
10,606 HP
(150 KVA)

Average
Operating
3
180
300
6
6 Total
70
75
3,700
12
1 1/2
5
4358.5 HP
90 KVA Total
Connected
4358.5 HP
(90 KVA)
                               385

-------
                        Table K-2 (continued)
Name
Water Cooling Tower
C.T. Well Pump (7,000 GPM)
C.T. Well Pump (7,000 GPM)
Spare
Cooling Tower Fan
Cooling Tower Fan
(B)
Connected
250
250
250
150
150
1,050 HP
Average
Operating
200
200
100
100
600 HP
Control Room '(Motors)

Instruments                            16 x 1/8 = 2  11/2
Air Conditioning (Heating)	20	10	
"7C5
                                       22 HP         11.5 HP
Total Plant Lighting
All Lights                             100 KW        60 KW
                                386

-------
K.5  GAS CLEANING AND CONDITIONING PLANT
     • Process Gas Inlet Flue Connection
     Gas after passing through a hot Cottrell  precipitator,  is
diverted by a new damper through a carbon steel  externally insulated
duct into the humidifying tower, (see Appendix K-l,  page K-39).
     • Humidifying Tower, T-1101
     The purpose of the humidifying tower is to saturate and cool
the dirty reverberatory gas before this gas enters  a packed  washing
tower.  Gas flows into the bottom of the empty humidifying tower and
upwards against a series of spray nozzles circulating liquid counter-
current to the up flowing gas stream.  The bottom of the tower has a
conical bottom which collects the recycled liquid which feeds an FRP
pump tank which in turn feeds the rubber lined recirculating pumps.
The liquor is then recycled back to the spray nozzles in the walls
and top dome of the humidifying tower.  This tower is a vertical
carbon steel vessel, teflon line, polypropylene (PPE) lined  and acid
proof brick lined.  If the gas contains fluorine, the brick  lining
will be carbon or graphite brick, otherwise if weak acid is  used,
standard acid proof brick is the construction material of this tower.
The hot gas inlet nozzle of the tower will be externally jacketed
and cooled with cooling water.
    •  Washing Tower, T-1102
    Construction of this tower usually is of fiber glass reinforced
plastic (FRP).  The gas inlet nozzle is in the lower section of this
vertical tower and the tower contains approximately 10 feet  of packing
consisting of 3-1/2 x 3-1/2 inch PPE Pall Rings.  The top of the tower
has a series of spray nozzles which allow weak liquor or water to  be
sprayed into the top of the tower and distributed uniformly  over the
packing.  The washing of the gas occurs as the gas  flows up  through
the packing and contracts the recycled cooled liquor flowing down  over
the packing.  The liquor is collected in the bottom of the tower and
is pumped by external rubber lined pumps through a series of carbate
coolers and recycled back to the top of the tower.

                                387

-------
     • Acid Mist Precipitator (Electrostatic Precipitators)
       (S-2802, A, B, C,  D,  E,  and F)
     The electrostatic acid  mist precipitators will  be the lead
tubuler type, with structural steel supports, and frames.

     The top high tension insulator compartments will be provided
with air sweep seals.  This equipment includes a total of three
complete high voltage electrical sets, necessary transformers,
rectifiers and automatic controls.  A water spray flushing nozzle
system is  included to permit the unit to be flushed out (washed)
and cleaned while in operation.  The precipitators are arranged
three in parallel flow, followed in series by three more in
parallel flow, a total of six units.  The overall operation and
clearance  efficiency for acid mist and dust carried into the unit
is estimated in excess of 98% of the rated flow capacity of the
unit.
     • Condensers (HE 1304, HE 1305)
     Two series of sets of parallel condensers are installed to
lower the  temperature of the gas to the required conditions in
order to achieve the correct ratio of water to S0? (water
balance).  Design requirements have been calculated in Appendix
K-l, page  K-69 and condenser design on page K-74.  The first set
of parallel flow condensers are cooled with water recycled
continuously from the cooling tower system.  Cooling water require-
ment calculation has been included in Appendix K-l, page K-82.
The second set of condensers are cooled with chilled refrigerated
water in closed circuit with the refrigeration unit

     The condensers  are constructed of carbon steel shells with
impervious graphite  tube sheets and tubes.  The top and bottom heads
or vestibule of these vertically mounted units are FRP  (fiber-
glass reinforced  plastic) and the  lower section of the  vestibule
contain a  separating section to remove condensate leaving the
                                 388

-------
system.  The flow of the gas is down through the tubes.   After the
first bank of parallel condensers the gas is collected and passed
by an FRP duct up to the top vestibule for down flow through the              ":
second bank of parallel condensers which are water chilled using              '*
refrigerated water.   The design of the second bank of condensers
is similar to that of the bank used in using cooling water as the
cooling media.

    The Allied-IHI Freon driven turbine system used to drive the
refrigeration system in this analysis has had considerable plant
experience by Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries in Japan and
the Allied Chemical  Corporation.
 K.6  SULFURIC ACID PLANT EQUIPMENT
     • Drying Tower, T-1303

     The  drying  tower is  fabricated  of carbon  steel  plate with
 minimal  wall  thicknesses of carbon  steel  as  follows:

         LOCATION              CARBON STEEL THICKNESS. INCHES
          Shell                            3/8
          Bottom                           5/8
          Top                              3/8
     The bottoms and sides of the tower are lined with teflon
 sheet covering with a minimum of one  layer acid proof brick over
 the  entire tower; however, the bottom section up to just  above
 the  gas  inlet nozzles will contain  one additional layer  of acid
 proof brick.  The packed section is approximately six feet deep
 and  consists of acid proof grid tile  and  special Intalock saddles
 or Cascade Minirings.  The packed section is supported on acid
 proof brick arches.  Acid distribution over the tower is  accomplished
                                389

-------
using troughs and spouts fabricated of cast iron.   One or more
spouts are provided for each square foot of cross  sectional  area
for the packed section.  The drying tower is provided with a
required number of nozzles and manholes, and mounted on the top of
the tower is a two stage acid mist eliminator demister (S-2803).
The flat bottom of the vertical tower is supported on steel  high
beam grillage which carries the load of the packed tower.  The
grillage allows the dissipation of heat from the bottom of the
tower.
     • Cold Heat Exchanger, HE-1301
     The cold heat exchanger is a carbon steel  vertical shell
 mounted on grillage and the unit contains 4,000-1-1/2 inch tubes,
 10 BWG - 30 feet long.  The entire shell is 1/2 inch thick carbon
 steel grillage and 1  inch thick tube sheets.  The gas enters  just
 above the top tube sheet in the top vestibule and flows down  through
 the tubes.  The cold gas is heated in the tube by the shell side
 upflow hot converter exit gas.  The entire inner  surface of the heat
 exchanger is aluminized.  The external surface of the heat exchanger
 has 2 inches of rockwool blanket insulation and a weather seal to
 protect it from the weather.
     •  Hot Heat Exchangers, HE-1302

     The  gas which  has  discharged  from the  blower  and  passed
through  the cold heat  exchanger  for  initial  preheating,  is  passed
out  of the bottom  vestibule  of the cold  heat exchanger into the
lower shell side of the  hot  heat  exchanger.  The  gas  flows  up
around the tubes of the  hot  heat  exchanger discharging at the
top  of the vertical heat exchanger just  under  the tube sheet.   The
exiting  temperature of the  gas leaving the hot  heat  exchanger  is
sufficient to  reach the  catalytic conversion temperature required
in the converter.   The hot  heat  exchanger  is a  vertical  carbon
steel vessel  containing  stainless steel  tubes  with the top  and
bottom tube  sheets stainless  steel.   This  unit contains  1,000,
3  inch  diameter tubes, 14 BWG-24  feet long between the tube sheets,
                                390

-------
with 6 feet of extension into the lower vestibule to act as dust
knockouts.  The bottom vestibule of this heat exchanger is a
conical bottom with a center collection nozzle and double dump
valves to allow any trapped dust to be removed from the system.
The entire inner surface of this heat exchanger is aluminized.
The top vestibule is lined with 2-1/4 or 2-1/2 inches of insulated
refractory to protect the vessel while it is used as a preheater
(during startup).  The entire outer surface of this heat exchanger
is covered with 2-1/2 to 3 inches to rockwool blanket insulation
and is normally installed inside of the building; however, if it
is installed outside, it will also contain external weather seal.
•  Converter R-2501
   The converter is a vertical carbon steel vessel with a dish top
head and flat bottom.  The converter is provided with cast iron
grillage grates to support the catalyst.  The catalyst grates are
supported by cast iron pipe columns to support a triangle grid
grate section for heat catalyst bed.  Each catalyst bed contains
two inches of quartz above and below each catalyst bed to maintain
and stabilize the catalyst.

     Gas, leaving the hot  heat exchanger HE-1302, enters the  top
dish head of the converter and flows down through the first catalyst
bed passing to the outside, to an external cooler, and then return-
ing to the second catalyst bed.  There  is a minimum of three
catalyst beds in this plant.  The internal surfaces of this converter
vessel are aluminized and covered externally with rockwool blanket
insulation and weather seal.  Each catalyst bed contains sufficient
catalyst to convert the gas to the required sulfur trioxide content.
Each catalyst bed has two thermocouples to indicate and record bed
temperatures and also contains pressure connections for taking the
pressure drop across each catalyst bed.
     • Catalyst
     The catalyst  is a vanadium  pentoxide  (V^O,-)  hard non-fusing
low ignition type catalyst and  is installed  in the converter.  This
                                 391

-------
catalyst meets the conversion conditions required at the flow and
the gas strength conditions.
    Twelve cases of catalyst  information were computed by Catalyst
and Chemicals, Inc.  These various catalyst cases were computer run
showing various gas strengths, oxygen contents and quench between
catalyst beds.  The catalyst  data was selected on the basis of
0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% SOo gas with varying oxygen compositions of
11% and 14%.   Also separate cases were used for by-passing cold
gas around the first catalyst bed and using it for quench cooling.
In each case it can be seen that the catalyst loading does not
substantially affect the capital cost of the plant.  The curve in
Figure K-3 shows that the differential price of investment from
one case to the next is only approximately a maximum of 25,000
dollars.  This is based on using 16,000 differential liters of
catalyst from one case to the next.  Therefore, it can be seen
that the effects of using quench gas in by-pass, or using oxygen
for dilution, or for quenching has substantially very little effect
on the capital cost of the plant.  The design is made for a total
of three catalyst beds to handle large fluctuations of gas.
    •  Absorption Tower, T-1104
    The design of the absorption tower is similar to that used
in the design of the drying tower.  The difference will be the
demister located in the top of the tower which is a high efficiency
absorption tower demister (S-2804).  This demister is a York type S
unit.
    •  Pump Tanks, TK-1904
    The pump tanks are constructed of 3/8 inch carbon steel plate.
The tops and bottoms are flat.  The bottoms and sides of the tank
are lined with three or four mil thickness of teflon sheeting and
a minimum of 3-3/4 inch course of acid proof brick.  Each tank is
supported vertically on steel grillage beams.  The top of each tank
contains two rectangular flanged nozzles to hold acid circul-
ating pumps.  One pump circulates acid continuously from the pump

                                 392

-------
 10
 «3
CD
  O
  c
  CD
  3
 cr

  o:
 z

  it
O   O
c   c
O)   OJ
3   3
o-  o-
      CM
     O

 CM +
O
     -C
+   o

-c   CD

°   £
      ii
           n
               ii
            CM  CM
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            O    CM

                                                                                            U,"   °

                                                                                            £   "g
•to-  o-


<   O
  CM Z
O
     CD
^   S.
•—   O
                           O      O
                           r—      LO
                                              O
                                              ur>
                                                                                             o
                                                                                            cr





/
^
m
\
\
^

0
0
o
««
iO
V
\
v \
^N.^ CM CM
T«>eyz:
o
o
CM
\
^
5.
o.

                                                                                            in
                                                                                             CD
                                                                                            T3
                                                                                             10
                                                                                             O
                                                                                            4J
                                                                                             to
                                                                              . o
1 1
S
1 1
E i
o
                                                LO
                                                                                       to
                                                                                       s-
                                                                                       o
                                                                                                 CD
                                                                                                 S-
                                                                                                 CD
                                                                                                  1
                                                                           tn           "  o
                                                                          .   .          (/)  o
                                                                           •—      CM  S-  O
                                                                                 O    O)    •>
                                                                                 CO    -P  O
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            o
                                                                                                 t/1

                                                                                                 Q)
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                             tO   II
                                                                                             O
                                                                                       X   CO
                                                                                       
                                                                                       to   to
                                                                                       to   s-
                                                                                       o   o
                                                                                       •M
                                                                                       X
                                                                                       CD
                                                                                       c
                                                                                             0)   CD
                                                                                                CD

                                                                                                CD

                                                                                                I
                                                                                                to
                                                                                                •o
                                                                                                CD
                                                                                                JO
                                                                                                      fO
                                                                                                      o

                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                                      to
                                                                                                      CD
                                                                                                      en
                                                                                                              1C
                                                                                                             4->
                                                                                                              fB
                                                                                                             0
                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                              (C
                                                                                                             Q
                                                                                                             CO
                                                                                                        CD
                                                                                                        S-
                                         1SA1V1V3  1V101
                                                    393

-------
tank through the coolers and over the tower and one pump is instal-
led as a spare.   The pump tanks each has manholes in the top and
drain nozzles as required for the necessary piping, and instru-
mentation connections.
     • Drying Tower Cooler, HE-1306
     These coolers are stainless steel  horizontally mounted units.
The acid flows through the shell side diverted by baffles across
the tubes.  The cooling flows through the tubes.  Each unit is in-
dividually anodically protected.  The purpose of the acid coolers
is to cool the acid which has increased in temperature as a result
of flowing through the tower, and mixing with cross-transfer acid.
The acid is pumped continuously from the pump tank through the
cooler and over the drying tower.
     • Absorption Cooler, HE-1307
     The design of the absorption tower cooler is similar to that
of the drying tower, however cooling is accomplished with Freon.
     • Product Acid Cooler, HE-1308
     This unit is considerably smaller but is similar in design to
the above coolers.
     • Converter Gas Cooler
     The converter gas cooler is provided to compensate for possible
maximum ranges of SCL entering the acid plant system from the rever-
beratory furnace.  Normal operation in the 0.5 to 1.5% S02 concen-
tration will not require this unit.
     Design calculations are included in Appendix K-l, page K-84.
     • Pumps and Drives
     The pumps are listed on the equipment list, Table K-l.  The
pumps in the gas cleaning portion of the plant  (front end) handling
weak acidic liquor and solids are horizontal rubber lined slurry
type pumps.  The strong acid pumps used in the system are Lewis
vertically submerged pumps that hang down into the pump tank.

                                394

-------
Cooling water pumps are vertically  hung pumps mounted  in the cold-
well.  All the  horizontal  pumps have  horizontal motors and vertical
pumps  have vertical motors.

K.7  EFFECT OF  PLANT LAYOUT AND EQUIPMENT POSITION
     In comparing Case I  (Onahama)  and Case  II  (Browder) it can
be seen that one of the major differences results because in Case
II a mixture of reverberatory boiler  exit and reverberatory gases
are mixed in the jog damper to give the required temperature enter-
ing the top vestibule of  the hot heat exchanger.  This scheme per-
mits the use of the hot gas from the  reverberatory to  replace a
fired  furnace which has been used at  Onahama  (Case I), where weak
gases  have been encountered and autothermal  conditions have not
been achieved in sulfuric acid plants.  The  distance that the sul-
furic  acid plant can be removed from  the reverberatory furnace is
critical.
     By reviewing known smelters, it  can be  seen that  usually the
reverberatory furnace building contains boilers and in these
buildings there is usually sufficient head space adjacent to or
above  the reverberatory boilers to  install gas-to-gas  exchangers.
The gas-to-gas  exchangers normally  would not occupy a  circular
space  of more than 6 - 7-1/2 meters (20-24 feet) in diameter even
for larger plants.  These heat exchangers can be installed in a
vertical position any place in a building adjacent to  the reverbera-
tory furnace or the reverberatory boiler.
     In the past, sulfuric acid plants had been built  essentially
at one  level,  in which  all of  the  equipment is installed  at  the
ground  level  location.   This  is  not  necessary.   Sulfuric  acid
plants  could  be  built  on more  than  one level, having  the  converter,
cold heat  exchanger  and hot heat exchangers mounted adjacent to a
reverberatory building  or within the building itself  and  above the
ground  level.   Location of the rest  of the sulfuric acid  plant is
not critical  and may be remotely placed.   It is  essential,  however,
                                395

-------
that the acid plant converter hot heat exchanger and cold heat
exchanger be adjacent to the reverberatory furnace when energy from
reverberatory off gas is used.   A typical  case might be taking
reverberatory furnace off gas from the exit of the Cottrell  precipi-
tator, further cleaning and humidifying it by passing through a wash
tower, demisters, and condensers, and then ducting it to a drying
tower adjacent to the absorption tower.  The drying tower, demisters
and blowers could be somewhat removed from the reverberatory furnace.
The gas could then be passed through a duct to a cold heat exchanger,
hot heat exchanger and the converter in an area in the reverberatory
building.  The gas leaving the cold ;heat exchanger could be re-piped
some distance back into the absorption tower and then vented to the
atmosphere through a stack.
     If this scheme, using the converter hot and cold heat exchanger
adjacent to the reverberatory furnace, is not used and these three
components are isolated from the reverberatory building, then the
system used at Onahama would apply, i.e., the hot heat exchanger
would have to be fired with an auxilliary combustion furnace
supplying the heat for the final pre-heating of the gas going to
the converter.  In each and every plant, it is not known if the
flow scheme in Case II could definitely be used.  Each would have
to be reviewed on a case by case basis to determine if the converter,
hot, and cold heat exchangers could be located adjacent to or in-
side of the reverberatory building.  There is even a possibility
where low head room buildings exist that extensions of the column
line could be made and the converter and heat exchangers located
on top or above the building.
     Plan views of Case I (Onahama) and Case II (Browder), to
scale are shown in Figures K-3a and 3b.

K.8  COST
     While it is not the object of this project to include detailed
cost estimates, a brief comment on installation schedule and system
                                396

-------

                 «• =
                 Si?
iiiiitiihffl!
                        co
                        o>

                        Z3
                        Dl
397

-------
                                                  co
                                                   J_
                                                   3
                                                   cn
                                                  •i—
                                                  u_
398

-------
costs is included here to provide a comparative review pointing out
design/cost relationship.
    Project construction schedule of 28 months is shown in Figure
K-4.  Capital costs vs. gas flow for various SCL concentrations is
                                                             3
shown in Figure K-5.  It can be expected that this 170,000 Mm /hr
(100,000 SCFM) plant will cost approximately $22,000,000 and pro-
duce slightly less than 200 tons/day sulfuric acid.
    Figure K-5 also shows comparable costs of conventional auto-
thermal metallurgical single contact acid plants operating at 4%
and 9% S02 gas.  The trend in all cases is for costs to decrease as
S02 concentration increases.  Also the Browder system costs are
considerably less than conventional single contact systems.  The
major reason for these cost variations is primarily because heat
exchanger requirements are affected by the amount of energy available
for heating the gas to the ignition temperature of 440°C (830°F).
The Browder process provides a large LMTD thereby minimizing heat
exchange surface area which can cost $15.00 per square foot.

K.9  ENERGY COMPARISON
    The following results indicate the additional energy in terms
of motor horse power and fuel oil required for Case I when compared
to Case II.  Additional details are given in Appendix K-l, page K-86.
                                  Connected
                 Average Operating
 Electrically Driven Units
   Chilled Water Refrigera-
   tion Units
   Preheater Blower
   (Add to Case  I)
 Oil-Fired Preheater
   Fuel Oil
1,750 HP

  250 HP
2,000 HP

410 gal/hr
1,625 HP

  235 HP
1,860 HP
                                 399

-------
0
c"
f-
c*
3
it*
0*
•^t
c<
A
c1
C<
C*
?
c
c-
O;
O
|V-
«
O
^

0
N
a
o
u22 *J a
IA*U i»n M r*
8* % 3 1
§1 §a| i §
aifi OK>£! a o
                                                    •a
                                                     OJ

                                                     o
                                                    oo
                                                     o
                                                     0)
                                                    •r-J
                                                     O

                                                    a_
                                                     0)
                                                     s-
400

-------
PLANT  COST
FURNACE:  5&S   SULPUFUC  ACID  PLANTS

O.S"- ?,S%  502. -  ,5/NSlE  CONTACT


   £55 5 "at? 7r~_V3_
                                 H..- .T|~-J	.-.-_.-.- -:. -^-^.-..--^^--i-.|_,.H-

               --M- .  'rH  '



                         zr^-.j-i.:!- -^r^'pr^ptivv::-:^::

                             "l     '  "'    ~""~  h-r-T-r T:-M

         :t:|—-	t--^-!	J-
          i I	— -i	—\^	:-

                                                TIM I. BROWDER COMPANY
                                                Post Office Box 8473
                                                San Manno, CA 91103, U.SA
                                                Telephone: (213) 287-7709
_Rt=VER.BERATDRY        FLOW
             -  CLEANED   GAS  ( DR.T.)
              Figure K-5
                     401

-------
                              APPENDIX L
      LIME/LIMESTONE GYPSUM SO? CONTROL SYSTEM FOR REVERBERATORY
             FURNACE OFFGASES AT THE ONAHAMA COPPER SMELTER
     The development of the lime/limestone gypsum S02 control
system has been carried out over a period of approximately 20 years
at the Hiroshima Technical Institute which is one of three R & D
facilities operated by Mitsubishi in Japan.  '    Their work
was initiated by reviewing scrubbing for all  pollutants including
particulates and S02«
     As the main interest turned to S02 removal, attention was cen-
tered on the control of a sintering plant in the year 1957.  Pilot
plant tests at approximatley 3,000 Nnr/hr were conducted for a
period of three months.  Pyrite sinter was used with ammonia as the
feed materials to obtain ammonium sulfate as a product.  The main
problem at that time was converting ammonium sulfite to ammonium
sulfate because of the demand for ammonium sulfate fertilizer.  The
process was intended to be installed at an industrial complex where
there was an iron and steel plant within 6 kilometers of a chemical
plant which made acid and fertilizer.  A pipe line was planned be-
tween the two plants.  This development work occurred during the
period from 1957 to 1960.  However, when the market dropped for
fertilizer, the project was dropped after it had been carried
through the design stage.
     In 1962 pilot tests were conducted at the Kansai Electric Power
Station at Amagasaki City near Osaka to select the absorbent and
type of scrubber.  The tests were conducted at the No. 3 power sta-
tion which had an oil fired boiler with a gas flow of 5,400 Nm^/hr
(3,350 scfm).  During this test program, ammonia, MgO, lime, lime-
stone and red mud waste from an aluminum plant were considered as
                                 402

-------
possible absorbents.  Bayer process aluminum plants waste consisted
of approximately 20 percent sodium along with aluminum, iron, titanium,
silicon, and sulfur.  Sodium aluminum silicate was obtained as a com-
plex salt from the red mud by first separating out the iron oxide pro-
ducing a white product.  Using MgO to get sulfuric acid directly was
not too successful because the best they could do at that time was
to obtain 50 percent concentration.
     It was determined, after the 1962 test program, that the lime/
limestone system was the best because it was simple, the lime was
readily available in Japan and the demand for gypsum was increasing.
The requirement for gypsum in Japan is approximately one-third that
of the U.S.
     During the period between 1968 and 1972, the Hiroshima Techni-
cal Institute carried out a $5 million program to investigate the
scaling problem which was occurring in the scrubber and the mist
eliminator of the pilot plant lime/limestone system.  The pilot
tests carried out in 1962 had not uncovered this problem because of
their relatively short duration, minimizing scale buildup.  Funda-
mental research at the bench scale, as well as pilot scale of 2,000
Nrrr/hr (1,250 scfm), was included.  Figure L-l is a photograph of
the pilot plant at the Hiroshima Technical Institute.
     The sulfite scale was easy to remove but the sulfate was very
hard.  It was found that preparation and operating conditions of
the absorbent were critical and required the proper range of pH,
temperature, concentration, construction material of the scrubber,
L/G, uniformity of the stream, and prevention of carry-over of mist
to the eliminator.  Their scaling work was reported at the EPA New
Orleans meeting in 1971 including the development of the seed
crystal technique.
     Research and development work on a dry activated manganese
oxide system during the period between 1964 and 1970 was also
conducted.  Pilot test work at the 1 MW, 55 MW and 110 MW levels
was conducted.  The 55 megawatt system was sponsored by MITI.

                                  403

-------
                                                   c
                                                   ro

                                                   D_


                                                   O


                                                   D-
                                                   in
                                                   a.
                                                   O)
                                                   C
                                                   o
                                                   4J
                                                   CO
                                                   0)
                                                   0)


                                                   01
404

-------
     This work was then followed by a 220 megawatt installation  at
the Yokaichi Power Station on an oil fired system.  The development
was completed satisfactorily from a technical standpoint but: did
not go commercial because it was not economical.
     Solid absorbents were also investigated.  Handling the solid
material absorbent was more difficult than the liquid, and it was
also discovered that the wet system would take a higher S02 con-
centration.  Furthermore, the byproduct was ammonium sulfate which
is currently not being used very extensively in Japan as a
fertilizer, having been replaced by urea.  The solid or dry systems
were reported at the 7th World Congress in Mexico City and also  at
the Los Angeles Chemical Engineering Society,  at the present time
Mitsubishi does not recommend dry systems particularly for rever-
beratory furnaces because the wet system can better handle the
higher S02 concentrations even though the dry system does not re-
quire water or stack reheat.  However, with the reverberatory fur-
nace gases, it is not expected that large quantities of water will
be required.
     There was some bench scale testing at S02 concentrations of
20,000 ppm before the system for the Onahama smelter reverberatory
furnace was constructed.  However, no pilot plant work was done
using the higher concentration compared to utility concentration.
                                 405

-------
                            APPENDIX M
                COMPONENTS INCLUDED IN THE ONAHAMA
               LIME/LIMESTONE GYPSUM CONTROL SYSTEM
Washing Tower
     The initial  washing tower includes inlet ducting with internal
sprays leading to a cylindrical  vessel  with a horizontal  axis.
Sprays are located along the top side.   This unit is constructed of
lead lined brick to provide resistance  to corrosion from  the low
pH (1-2) water resulting from absorption of a slight amount of  S02
and SO,.  Internal baffles are placed vertically to the axis at
several intervals to cause mixing of the gas and spray by disturbing
the flow pattern of the gas as it passes through the chamber.   The
gas leaving the washing tower is near saturation temperature.   The
pressure drop of this unit is approximately 70 mm FLO.
Gas'Coolers
     The five gas coolers are sea water indirectly cooled heat
exchangers.*  These coolers drop the gypsum system inlet  gas temp-
erature in preparation from entry into the absorption towers.
                               3
Cooling water required is 930 m /hour.
Absorption Towers
     Two plastic grid packed absorbers in series are used.  Their
external shell is made of steel  plates lined with synthetic rubber.
The grid packing has large openings to minimize plugging  and pres-
sure drop.
     The grid packed tower was adopted for the absorption units
*Ten coolers are commonly used when both the gypsum plant and the
 MgO plant are in operation.
                                406

-------
because its mass transfer coefficient for SCL absorption is high,
its pressure loss low, the structure simple, its performance
stability against load variation is large and in addition it can
be scaled up or down easily.
     The lower the pH of the absorbing solution the higher the
Ca utilization.  Conversely the lower the pH of the absorbing solu-
tion the higher will be the S02 concentration in the offgas.  To
lower S02 concentration at the outlet it is necessary to increase
pH considerably.  Therefore the rate of SCL absorption and Ca
utilization can be satisfied only when a multistage absorber is
used.  The absorbers are designed so that the pH of the circulating
solution in the #2 absorber is kept at 7, that of the absorbing
solution to be taken out of #1 is decreased to 4 or less, which
is also desirable for operation in the oxidizing section.
     It is important to obtain an internal configuration producing
an operating condition that prevents the slurry from stagnating and
ensuring that all the inner surfaces of the absorber are sufficient-
ly sprayed or covered with absorbing solution to avoid any pH
variation which could occur locally which may provide a condition
for scale generation.  The addition of gypsum seed contributed to
lowering of super saturated concentration of gypsum and makes a
sacrificial surface to crystal precipitation.  The piping systems
are designed such that a suitable flow rate is maintained to prevent
sedimentation of particles in the slurry as well as preventing
clogging by installing strainers at suitable places.
Mist Eliminator
     The mist eliminator located in the gas circuit downstream
of the absorbers is of the Chevron type.  It is internally coated
with synthetic resin and made of steel.
Oxidizing Section
     Three oxidizing towers are also internally coated with
synthetic resin.  Figure M-l shows a schematic diagram of the rotary
atomizers used to promote oxidation inside these towers.  Absorbing
                                407

-------
solution taken out of the absorbing section  is  fed  to  the  oxidizing
tower where it is oxidized by air at pH 3.0  to  4.5  according to the
follow equation:
     CaS03.l/2 H20 + 1/2 ^ solution" CaS04.2H20
     It is believed that the reaction of calcium sulfite advances
through the medium of bisulfite ion.  This reaction mechanism has
also been proven  by a correlation of the mass transfer coefficient
of the oxidizing  tower, pH value and bisulfite  ion  concentration.
     The oxidation reaction depends on dissolution  and diffusion
of oxygen into the slurry.  Decrease in air  bubble  diameter and
increase in the amount of gas in the solution were  the objectives
of the rotary atomizer developed.  Figure M-l also  shows the tower used
for atomizer development.  This atomizer tears  with a  shearing force
caused by rotation between the surrounding solution and air layer.
The air layer formed on the external surface of the cylinder which
rotates at about 500 to 1000 rpm generates fine air bubbles of
0.1 to 1.0 mm.
     The oxidizing towers are indirectly cooled with the cooling
water going to a cooling tower for reuse in  this circuit.   The
speed of oxidation is controlled by the pressure of the oxidizer.
The oxidizer tower was designed for 70 psi and  the  actual  nominal
                                                               2
operating pressure of the air is between 40  and 45  psi (3 kg/cm  ).
Slurry Section
     Slurry flowing out of the oxidizing tower  is concentrated in
a thickener.  The underflow slurry from the  thickener is treated by
a basket type centrifugal separator to separate the dihydrate crystal
of gypsum.  The percentage of water content  in  the  centrifuge
material is 5-10 percent.  Overflow liquid from the thickener
and filtrate from the centrifuge is used for preparation of lime
slurry and for other purposes.
Centrifuges
     A vertical basket type centrifuge design is used.  There are
                                408

-------
                                                                   fin* •» kvbMt
Figure M-l.  Rotary  Atomizer Schematic, Test  Tower and Spray Pattern
                                      409

-------
14 centrifuges all  operating continuously with no spares.
     The smaller the crystal size the more difficult it is to
separate in the centrifuge.   Also small  size tends to produce vibra-
tion.
     Excessive amounts of silica in the  gypsum tend to plug the
centrifuge screens.
Slaking Section
     Quick lime is  fed to the slaker from a hopper and is  mixed with
liquid from the thickener overflow.  From the slaker, the  material
goes to a ball mill  where it is ground and passed through  a liquid
cyclone.  Underflow from the liquid cyclone is recycled to the ball
mill and overflow goes to the milk holder for use in the lime feed
system to the absorber.
                                410

-------
                            APPENDIX N
                   WATER BALANCE GYPSUM SYSTEM

     This balance is for the lime-limestone-gypsum system being
used at the Onahama copper smelter in Japan.   Information received
from the Onahama smelter indicated the water  flowrates  at different
process locations.   This information has been utilized  to obtain
an approximate water balance shown in Figure  M-l.

Washing Tower and Gas Cooling Section
a)  Quantity of water in flue gas
     Flue gas rate at Onahama - 2,000 Nm3/min = 70,600  SCFM
     Amount of water in the flue gas = 0.116  Ibs/lb of  dry gas
     Assuming the density of the flue gas
       = 0.0808 lbs/ft3 (Density of air)
   /.Mass rate of flue gas = 0.0808 x 70,600
                           = 5,704 Ibs/min
     Quantity of water in the flue gas = 5,704 Ibs/min
       y 0.116 Ibs H20
       * 1.116 Ibs gas
                           = 593 Ibs/min
   .'.Quantity of dry gas = 5,704 = 593 = 5,111  Ibs/min
b)  Quantity of water in gas at outlet of Washing  Tower
     Assuming the gas is saturated with water vapor at  the outlet
of the washing tower and is at 60°C:
     Humidity ratio = 0 623 x Partial Pressure of  Water Vapor (Pv)
     Humiany ratio   u.b^j x    Absolute Pressure of Vapor (Pa)
     Pv at 60°C from steam tables = 2.890 Ibs/sq in
     Pa = 14.696 - 2.890 = 11.806 Ibs/sq in
                                411

-------
     Humidity ratio = 0.623 x        - 0.1525 jjg »?° gas
   .'.Water in gas at the outlet   ,. ,,,  Ibs dry gas Y n -,„,-   Ibs  H?0
     of the washing tower         °'"'      min          OD lbs dry gas
   .'.Quantity of water added to
     flue gas in the washing    = 785-593
     tower
                                = 192 lbs.
c)  Quantity of water in gas at outlet of Gas  Coolers
     Quantity of dry gas = 5,111 lbs dry gas/min
     Assuming the gas to be saturated at the outlet of the gas
coolers and at 45°C:
     Humidity ratio = 0.623 p^-

                               -L39I= 0.0651  lbs H?°	
   .'.Quantity of water in gas at the outlet of the gas coolers
                    = 5,111  x 0.0651
                    = 333 Ibs of H20/min
d)  Water balance
     Therefore, in the Washing Tower and Gas Cooling System
785-332 = 453 lbs of H^O/min is removed in the gas cooling system,
whereas 192 lbs of HLO/min is added in the washing tower.
     Hence, in the Washing Tower and Gas Cooling Section,  260 Ibs
of HgO/min excess water is removed from the flue gas and 324 lbs
of H0/min remains in the gas to the Absorbers.
The Absorber Slurry System
     Water Outlet Sources
a)  Water going out to the ocean from the neutralization tank
             = 6,636 Ibs/min (4,336 M3/day)
b)  Some water is removed from the system by the mass of gypsum
being produced by two processes; i)  surface moisture, and, ii) water

                               412

-------
of crystallization.
     Assuming the gypsum contains 10 percent surface moisture:
   .'.Water going out of the system as:
     (i) surface moisture with gypsum = 450 x 0.1  = 45 TPD
                                      = 62.5 Ibs of H20/min
    (ii) Mass of water of cyrstallization with gypsum can be
obtained from the chemical formula of gypsum
         Molecular weight of CaSo4 .2H20 = 172.17
         where molecular weight of 2H20 = 36
                                            oe
   .'.Water of crystallization in gypsum = ,72 17 x (450 ~45) TPD
                                        = 84.7 TPD
                                        = 118 Ibs/min
    .'.Total mass of water in gypsum = 118 +62
                                   = 180 Ibs/min
c)  The moisture in the exhaust gases through the main stack is
another source of moisture loss.
     Assuming the gas is saturated with water vapor at the outlet
of the main stack and is at 45°C
                                Pv
    .'.The Humidity ratio = 0.623 ^
                        - n fi??  1.391  = 0.0651 Ibs H20
                          u     13.305     Ibs dry gas
    .'.Quantity of water in gas at the outlet of the main stack
                        = 5,111 x 0.0651
                        = 333 Ibs of H20/min
d)  Total water outlet from system = 6,636 + 180 + 333
                                   = 7,149 Ib/min

     Water Inlet Sources
a)  Water in flue gas at inlet to Absorbers = 333 Ibs/min
                                413

-------
b)  Water inlet due to pump seal  leakage =  3,673  Ibs/min
    (2,400 M3/day)
                                                  o
c)  Water from atomizer leaks  = 459 Ibs/min (300  M /day)
d)  Water from TCA spill  gas system =  1,613 Ibs/min  (1,054 M  /day)
e)  Water from Miscellaneous Sources being  input  to  the neutral-
    ization tank:
           = 1,071 Ibs/min (700 m3/day)
f)  Total water inlet to system 7,149  Ibs/min
   /.Water inlet (7,149 Ibs/min)  = Water outlet (7,149 Ibs/min)
                                414

-------
                            APPENDIX 0
     MAGNESIUM OXIDE SYSTEM COMPONENT AND COST CONSIDERATIONS

     The TCA absorber is 26.5 meters high and 4 meters in diameter.
The rotary calciner is 52 meters long and 3.4 meters in diameter.
Each of the two dryers used contains 900 sq.  meters of steam drying
surface area.
                                      3
     The blower is designed for 2200 m /minute at 900 KW.  One
spare blower is also available.  The slaker is 35 m  and the ball
mill is 2 meters by 4 meters.
     The cost of operation of the MgO system is higher than the
gypsum system but is still in the range of four to five cents per
pound of copper, assuming no credit for product sales.  The MgO
system would have an advantage over the gypsum system in terms of
the operating cost providing that there is an existing acid plant
to treat the S02 gas from the MgO plant and the acid credit is
reasonable.  Capital costs of both systems are the same and present-
ly considered to be $7,500,000 for the 1500 Nm /minute size system
at Onahama.
                                415

-------
                             APPENDIX P
             CHEMISTRY INVOLVED IN MAGNESIUM OXIDE SYSTEM

      The simplified chemical reactions taking place in the process
may be written as follows:
Absorber:
MgO + S02 + 3H20 - ^ MgS03 • 3H20   (very  little formed)

MgO + S02 + 6H20 - +•  MgS03 • 6H20

MgS03 + %02 + 7H2 0 - +>  MgS04 • 7H20

Dryer:
MgS03 • 3H20  heat »  MgS03 + 3H20

MgS03 • 6H20  heat >
MgS04 • 7H20 -    - ^ MgS0
Calciner:
MgS03  heat»  MgO + S02

MgS04 + %C  heat •>  MgO + S02
 Input  Material  and  Preparation
       The magnesium hydroxide is  purchased  as  a  liquid  containing
                                  416

-------
20-30 percent solids of Mg(OH)2.   Analysis  of  this material  is:

                        •  CaO   0.97%
                        •  S04   0.30%
                        •  MgO   17.68%
                        •  H?0   remainder
                                417

-------
                            APPENDIX Q
                  WATER BALANCE IN THE MgO SYSTEM

Washing Tower and Gas Cooling Section
a)  Flue gas
     Flue gas flow rate = 1,500 Nm3/min = 52,970 SCFM
     Humidity ratio of flue gas = 0.116 Ibs of H20/lb of dry gas
     Density of flue gas = 0.0808 lbs/ft3 (Density of air)
   /.Mass rate of flue gas = 52,970 SCFM x 0.0808
                           =  4,280 Ibs/min
   .'.Quantity of water in the flue gas
                           . 4.2SO ,bs/»1n x 0.1J6 jbs H,0
                           = 445.87 Ibs/min
   .'.Quantity of dry gas   = 4,280 -445
                           = 3,835 Ibs/min

b)  Washing Tower
     Assuming that the gas is saturated with water vapor at the
outlet of the washing tower and is at 60°C
     Humidity ratio of gas at outlet
                              Pv (Partial pressure of vapor)
                              Pa (Absolute partial pressure)
                      = 0.623 x ^"gog = 0.1534 = .1525
   .'.Water in gas at the outlet of the washing tower
            = 3,835 x 0.1525 = 585 Ibs H20/min

                                418

-------
   .'.Quantity of water added to the flue gas in the washing tower
          = 585 -445 = 140 Ibs/min

c)  Gas coolers
     Assuming that the gas is saturated with water vapor at the
outlet of the gas coolers and is at 45°C:
     Humidity ratio of gas at
     outlet of the gas coolers   = 0.623 x 1.391/13.305
                                 = o 0651 1bs H2°
                                   u'ubbl IDS dry gas
   .'.The total quantity of water at exit of the gas coolers
                                 = °'0651   bs d   gas x 3'835 1bs/min
                                 = 250 Ibs H20/min

d)  Water balance
     Water inlet to washing tower in flue  gas = 445 Ibs/min
     Water outlet at gas coolers exit = 250 Ibs/min
   .'.Total water lost by flue gas in the washing tower and gas
     cooling section is
                                 = 445 -250 = 195 Ibs/min

The Absorber Slurry System
a)  Water in Make up Slurry
     The composition of the make up slurry is given as follows:
              CaO = 0.97%            MgO = 17.68%
              S04 = 0.3%             H20 = 81.05%
Also, quantity of Mg (OH)2 being input is  given:  1,128 Ibs/hr
                                                = 18.8 Ibs/min
                              40
   .'.MgO being input = 18.8 x Jg- = 12.97 Ibs/min
   .'.Quantity of H20 in slurry = 12.97 x ^=|

                               = 59.46 Ibs/min
                                419

-------
b)  Water loss in dryer
     To determine the quantity of water evaporated  in  the  dryer,
the following assumptions were made:
1.  The cake going to the dryer is assumed to be MgSO.,.  GhLO
    since the MgO and MgSCL.   7HLO in the cake are  negligible
    compared to MgSO,.   6hLO.
2.  The quantity of MgS(L.  6HLO is calculated from the  reaction
    between MgO and SCL.
3.  It is assumed that the cake contains 10% surface moisture.
    MgS03 is formed in the absorber by the following reaction.
               MgO + S02   - *>  MgS03
               40 + 64     - *>  104
It is also known that:
                                  3
     Volume flow of gas = 1,500 Nm /min
     Volume flow of S02 = 1,500 x 0.026 = 39 Nm3/min = 1,377 SCFM
   .'.Mass flow of S02 = 1,377 scfm x 0.16867 lbs/ft3 = 232.3 Ibs/min
     Ratio of Mg(PH)2 makeup to S02 absorbed = 0.08 kg Mg(OH)2/kg
of S02
     We know the quantity of SOp in the flue gas.   Assuming 100%
S02 absorption, quantity of MgO used is equal to:
     232.3
      64
           x 40 = 145.2 Ibs/min
                                    ?
   .'.Quantity of MgS03 produced  ^Q    x  104
               = 377.5 Ibs/min
     Amount of water of crystallization in MgSCL.  6HLO
                 377.5
                  104
                       x 108 = 392.0 Ibs/min
                               420

-------
   .'.Total amount of MgSO,.  60 produced = sum of MgSO., produced
       plus water of crystallization
       = 377.5 +392.0 = 769.5 Ibs/min
   .'.The total quantity of the cake going through the dryer
       = 769.5/0.90 = 855.0 Ibs/min
All the surface moisture and water of crystallization is driven
off in the dryer
   .'.The quantity of water lost from the dryer
       = 855.0 =377.5 = 477.5 Ibs/min

c)  Water Balance
     The quantity of water coming into the system from the pump
seals is given as 11 T/hr = 411 Ibs/min.
     The quantity of slurry purged = 10 T/day 15.6 Ibs/min.  Assum-
ing 90 percent of the slurry purged is water, the quantity of water
purged = 15.6 x 0.9 = 14.04 Ibs/min.
   .'.Water coming into the system = water through the pump seals
     + water in makeup slurry =411 + 59 = 470 Ibs/min
     Water coming out of the system = water lost from the dryer +
water lost in the purged slurry = 477.5 + 14.04 = 492 Ibs/min.

Note:  the overall water balance indicates more water leaving the
system than being charged to the system.  The difference can be
attributed to combustion products, miscellaneous sources of water
of which data were not available and measurement errors.
                                421

-------
                           APPENDIX R
            PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR THE CITRATE PROCESS62

       Absorption  of S02  in aqueous solution  is  pH  dependent,
increasing at higher pH.   Dissolution of S02 forms bisulfite ion
with resultant decrease in pH by the following reaction:
      However, by incorporating a buffering agent in the solution
to inhibit pH decrease, high S02 loading and substantially
complete S02 removal from the waste gases can be attained.  This
citrate ion performs this buffering action by the following
reaction:
      The chemistry for the production of sulfur and regeneration
of absorbent by reacting H/>S with the S02 in the aqueous solution
is complex, but the overall reaction is as follows:
      Hydrogen sulfide for regenerating the absorbent and pre-
cipitating elemental sulfur can be produced by reacting sulfur
with methane and steam by the following reaction:
                                 422

-------
                          APPENDIX S
         PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR FLAKT CITRATE PROCESS63

      The chemical reactions in the absorption stripping operation
follows the simplified reaction scheme given below.

       S02 (g)^Z±S02  (aq)                        (1)
                                                     (2)
                                    (2-n)
                                                     (3)

      Ci denotes the citrate ion, with n = 0, 1 or 2.  The forward
reactions take place during absorption, and the reverse reactions
during stripping.
      Absorption of S02 in aqueous solution is pH dependent,
increasing at higher pH.  Because dissolution of S02 forms
bisulfite (HS03~ ) ion with the resultant decrease in pH by the
reaction 2, the absorption of S02 in aqueous solution is self-
limiting.  However, by incorporating a buffering agent in the
solution to inhibit pH decreasd (remove the hydrogen ions
formed in reaction 2), high S02 loadings and substantially complete
S02 removal can be attained.  In the citrate process this is
accomplished by the buffering action of the various citrate species
by the reaction 3.
      The buffering capacity is naturally dependent on the concen-
tration of citric acid and sodium hydroxide and the relation
between them.  In the Flakt-Boliden citrate process, the concen-
tration of sodium hydroxide is between once and twice that of
citric acid.   (The relationship chosen is dependent upon the raw
gas composition).  In most cases this results in the absorbent pH
of 4 to 5. 54
                               423

-------
                          APPENDIX T
 PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMMINCO AMMONIA S02 CONTROL SYSTEM

      The process consists of absorbing the S02 from the flue gas
in aqua ammonia, forming a solution that is essentially ammonium
bisulfite according to the following relations:
          2NH4OH + S02 - ^(NH4)2S03 + H20
          (NH4)2 S03 + S02 + H20 - ^2NH4HS03
      In addition to ammonium bisulfite, some ammonium sulfate
is also formed primarily by the reaction:
         (NH4)2S03  + 1/2
      Since the aim of the L.C.  process is to make ammonium
sulfate to be used as a fertilizer, the ammonium bisulfate com
bines with sulfuric acid to produce ammonium sulfate by the
reaction:
          2NH4HS03
          (NH4)2S03  +  H2S04 - MNH4)2S04
                              424

-------
                         APPENDIX U
         PROCESS CHEMISTRY FOR WELLMAN-LORD SYSTEM64
      The process is based on the chemistry of the sodium sulfite/
bisulfite system.  Flue gas containing SOp is scrubbed with a
solution consisting of soluble Na2S03, NaHS03> and Na,,S04.   The
S02 reacts with sodium sulfite to form sodium bisulfite according
to the following reaction.
         S02 + Na2S03 + H20	*>2 NaHS03
      In the regeneration cycle, the above reaction is reversed
by the application of heat releasing sulfur dioxide and regenerat-
ing the sodium sulfite.
         2  NaHS0	^NaS0  + S0  + H0
                             425

-------
                                   APPENDIX  V


RECOVERY OF SULFUR FROM SMELTER GASES BY  THE  ORKLA  PROCESS  AT  RIO  TINTO


              Submitted for discussion, 21«t April, 1949.
              fRecovery of Sulphur  from  Smelter Gases by  the
                            Orkla  Process at  Rio  Tinto*

              By H. R. PoTTaf, Member, and E. G. LAwronoJ, A.K.S.M., Member

                                       INTRODUCTION

              NUMEROUS patents have beon granted for processes designed to
              recover sulphur from industrial gases, but so far as the authors arc
              aware only two or three of these processes have  been successfully
              worked on a large scale ; the object of this paper  is to describe one
              that has given very successful  results in  at least three different*
              countries—namely, the process which was worked out in  Norway
              by Mr. N. E. Lonandur of the Orkla  Grube Aktiobolag and which
              has tho distinguishing feature of recovering sulphur as a by-product
              of copper smelting.
                 Sulphur was first successfully recovered as a by-product from tho
              blast-furnace smelting  of pyritic copper ore at  a small plant at
              Lokken, Norway, about tho year 1928.   Tho success of this  pilot
              plant  led to the construction of a large modern smelter with four
              blast-furnaces at Thamshaven, near Lokken, which was completed
              about 1932.
                 The first  unit (a single blast-furnace)  of tho  Rio Tinto plant
              wont into production in August, 1980, and  tho plant has since been
              gradually expanded by the modification of two  more furnaces of
              the original smelter, so that there are now, in all, three furnaces
              specially equipped  for tho recovery of sulphur.
                 Reference will, from  time to time, bo made to the plants of both
              the Orkla Company, Norway, and of Mina de S. Domingos, Portugal,
              operated by Mason &, Barry, Ltd., but the main purpose of these-
              notes is to describe the work at Rio Tinto,  as tho  conditions arc, in
              certain respects, markedly different from those prevailing at Orkla.
                 For convenience of presentation tho paper is divided into throe
              Hoctions—nanwly, Section 1—Principles of the process ;  Section 2—
              The plant;  Section 8—Practice of tho process.

                 •Paper received on 12th January, 1049.
                 tSinelter superintendent, Rio Tinto Co., Ltd., 1034-1948.
                 JTnuhnical staff, Rio Tinto Co., Ltd.
                                          426

-------
428  IT. n. POTTS AND E. 0. tAWFORD : RECOVERY OF BUM'llt'tt

      SECTION 1— PRINCIPLES OP THE PROCESS
  It will be  remembered that in tho smelting of pyritio copper
ores the loose ntom sulphur is distilled off at tho top of tho chargn
column  and  burns in atmospheric air.  The iron  monosulpliido
descends and at or near tho focus burns in the oxygen of tho  Must,
forming iron  oxido (which is at once slagged)  and sulphur dioxide
gas ;  unoxidizod  monosulphidc, together  with  tho  mtlphidu  of
copper,  forms tho matte, which nlso contains Bomo magnetite nnd
the sulphides of  load, zinc,  etc.  Tho  authors  have referred  l»
tho compound remaining after tho distillation of tho loosu  ntom
Biilphur as  monosulpliido of iron, but actually this compound is
generally considered to bo FonSn + i, in which  n is gonornlly  tul««n
to bo about 7.  The reactions (lien are :
                                                       (1)
                                                       (2}

  It has long been  realized that under certain conditions it in
possible effectively to reduce SO, by solid carbon according to  the
equation —
     SOt-fC=CO,+ iS, [[[   (3)
The inventor of tho process therefore conceived the idea that if
an ordinary blast-furnace, primarily designed for the smelting of
sulphide ores  to  matte, could bo fitted with a closed top very
similar to that used on  a conventional iron blasl-furnnco nnd that
if, furthermore,  a substantial  excess of coke wero added  to  tho
charge,  two results would follow :  First,  tho looso atom  sulphur
would not burn, as thoro would bo no oxygen present and, secondly,
the S0t produced at the focus would  bo reduced in the course of its
ascent through tbo charge column, by the colte  present.  In this
fashion a g.is would bo produced  containing only nitrogen, carbon
dioxide, and sulphur  vapour, tho last-named derived partly from
tiio loose atom sulphur distilled from tho pyrites while descending
towards  tho  focus, and partly  from  the  reduction  of tho SOj
formed  near the  focus.   On cooling tho gas tho sulphur vapour
would condense and >l>o sulphur could thus  bo rocovorod.
  Tho Norwegian cxpertmonlers found that it was quite a simple
matter to close in tho top of tbo furn.ico and to use for charging a
line of bells similar to those used on an iron blast-furnaco.  They
also found that when using  100 Itg. colco per ton* of pyrites in  tho
charge the effect was ns expected arid a  substantial recovery of
sulphur resulted.
  Ideally,  then, tho  aim of tho process is to produce as  much
sulphur dioxide as possible at tho focus and  to havo this travel up
the column in such a  way as to effect complete reduction by solid
carbon before tho gases loavo  tho furnace.   It is usually assumed
that this reaction takes place for the most part in  throo stages.


-------
    FROM flMEWBR OASBB BY TltH ORTCLA, PROCESS AT WO T1STO 429

The first in represented by equation (3).  In the second stage the
C0t formed is reduced by coke a little higher up the furnaco :
    CO,+C-2CO	   (4)
The CO at once reacts with SO, thus :
    80,4-200.= §S.+2CO,	   (5)
This last reaction goes towards completion at  temperature* below
COO°C.  It must bo carefully noted that if equations (4) and (5) bo
added together and like molecules subtracted from each side of the
equation tho result is equation (8).  Therefore, from the point of
view of coke consumption per  ton of SO. reduced, it matters not
at all whether reduction proceeds in one step or in  three, provided
that all the CO involved is derived from COZ produced by equation
(8) and not  from other sources which will now bo  discussed.
   Unfortunately tho reduction of SO, by solid  carbon—equation
(8)—will only  take place with reasonable rapidity at a tompnraturo
of  about 1,200°C. and   in tho  copper blast-furnace  the high
temperature zone  does not extend for a  sufficient  distance above
the focus to give  efficient reduction.  In  other words, there  is
insufficient contact time  at the  temperatures prevailing  for tho
coke to burn in S0» and  much of it passes unburnt down to tho
focus, whoro it burns in oxygon to CO,.  Tho greater part of (his
00t is reduced to  CO just above tho focus and then reduces SO.
in accordance with equation (5).  This burning of coke in air nt
tho focus has two very ill effects : First, it moans that reduction of
SO. is dono by CO, using 750 kg. of  carbon  per  ton  of  sulphur
instead of only 875 kg.,  tho quantity required for reduction by
solid  carbon whether  directly by equation (3) or in  stages  by
equations (8),  (4) and (5) ; secondly, the carbon consumes oxygen,
which would otherwise bo available for oxidizing FeS and producing
SO,.  Tho practical manifestation of this effect is a largo matte
' fall' of poor  grade.
   Tho fact has to bo faced that, in attempting to carry  out (he
reduction of nulphur dioxide by coke in n wator-jackotod  furnace
within a few feet of tho focus, (he aim is to superimpose a reduction
process on one which is essentially intensely oxidizing.  Tho result
is  necessarily a compromise, in which  tho pyritic  smelting is not
very good and  the reduction of sulphur dioxide somewhat inefficient.
   A cotnploto carbon and sulphur balance is sot out  in what follows
and a quantitative  analysis of the theory developed in an endeavour
to assess l,ho amount of SOZ reduced by C and by CO respectively.
   Tho authors must, however, state at tho outset that in developing
a quantitative analysis of tho thoory, (hey do so with great reserve,
because of (ho enormous difficulties involved in obtaining accurate
samples and analyses of tho furnace gases;  this subject deserves
a  papor to  itself.   Suffice it  to  say that  oven to-day it  is not
absolutory certain that tho sampling and nnolysis at  Rio Tin to gives
the correct  distribution of sulphur in tho guses as  between thr
various compounds SO., COS,  CS2, etc.
   I     thnli    'i  sp'1    '  thi- —orta:"*" and '" ^ito  of the
                              428

-------
 430  E. R. POTTS AND E. O. LAWFORD : RECOVERY OF SULPHUR
                              TABLE I
                TYHCAI. FURNACE FEED AND PRODUCTS
                     (in metric tons por furnace day)
                  Tout
        Cu
      per cent
         S
      per cent
         Ft
      per cent
        SiOt
      percent
        At
      percent
        Afh
       per cent
ftSKO
  Pyrites	
  Quartz	
  Converter slag
  Limestone  ...
  Sulphur  	
  Coko	
     Total  	

PRODUCTS
  Matte 	
  Slag	
  Dust	
  Crude sulphur
188-6
 51-8
 23-0
 16-6
  5-0
 20-0
305-0
 40-0
101-0
  1-5
 68-5
1-70
2-75
48-12
 1-60
        00-01
41-25
 6-33
55-53
 2-60
88-30
18-00
0-71
                       2-72
0-23
0-30
25-32
 2-54

06-91
61-45
40-78
33-30
                               2-12
                       0-20
                    Per cent
                    by Vol.
CASES
   CO,
   CO
   SO, ,
   H,S ,
   cs,
   COS
   3  ...
    13-8
     0-9
     0-5
     3-0
     0-41
       Total
             
-------
    PROM SMELTER OASES BY THE ORKLA PROCESS AT RIO TINTO 481


fact that they make certain broad assumptions  the validity of
which may possibly  be questioned, the authors think it  is worth
•while to sot out a quantitative analysis of the reduction theory.
  The data required  are given in Table I.
  The first step is the determination of the volume of gas per ton
of pyrites smelted by means of the carbon balance.
                                                   leg. of Carbon per
                                                   1,000 kg. pyrites
     Charged to the furnace as coke	      07-01
     Carbon charged to furnace in limestone	        0-32

     Totnl carbon charged to furnace	      100-93

Carbon in exit gases  :
                                                      g. Carbon
                                                      per cv. m.
     CO,  13-8 por cent	       73-98
     CO    0-0  	        4-82
     COS  	        2-UO
     CS	        3-84

     Total	       85-54

Therefore the volume of gas por 1,000 kg. pyrites is—
                    108-03 x 1.000   , „„
                   	—	1.200 cu.ni.

  The total sulphur in tho exit gases  per 1,000 kg. pyrites  will
therefore be:
  In SO8  ...   42-7 g.  S por cu. m. X  1,250  	   03-3 kg.
  .. H2S  ...    0-1	   x   	    7-7  „
  .. CS	   20-5	   X   ,	   20-0  „
  .. COS  ...    7-7	   x   	    9-6  „
  .. S  	    3-0	   X   ,	    3-8  „
     Total...  80-0 .. „  „    „   X  ,	  100-0 „

  Tho sulphur balance  can now bo constructed as in .Tnblo II on
page 483.
  The first step in the quantitative analysis of the theory is to
determine tho quantities of sulphur produced respectively by the
reduction of SOZ and by the volatilization of volatile sulphur.   Tho
calculation follows:
                                                       kg. S per
                                                       1,000 kg.
                                                        pyrites
1.  Calculation of volatile tulphur
     Total  sulphur in pyrites 	   482-2
     Leas Sulphur combined with Cu, Pb, Zn, etc	    19-0
     Sulphur in FoS,  	    403-2
     Therefore, volatile sulphur (42 per cent of sulphur in
       FoSj) 	   194-5
     Add Sulphur in residues 	    25-4

       Total volatile sulphur	   219-0
                             430

-------
432  ir. n. POTTS AXD E. o. LAWPORTI :  nEcovEnr OF sotnrun


                                                      leg. Sjtrr
                                                      1.000 l-g.
                                                       j>yr,te»
Z.  Calculation of fulptiur recovered by reduction ofSOt
     Total lulphur cho.rpcod to fwrrmco	    500-0
     Dtflnet volatile su'.phui-, volnl ilizc-d  	    21'J-O

     Fixed milpliur (tutoring mm
-------
    FROM SMBVrnn OASBS m TUB ORKLA PUOCBSS AT RIO TINTO 433

                          TABM II

CifAnoieo TO PuiWAOie
Pyrito* 	





TOT AL . . . • . .
CoUo 	

PRODUCED
Mntto 	
Stac 	
Dust 	
Oanes 	 	 	


TOTAL 	

Tout
188-0
n-o
23-0
51-8
10-0

'85-0
20-9

C8-5
49-0
101-0
1-5





Per cent
,n/p~ ''*"' ralf-
                          432

-------
484 . H. H. POTTS AND B. O. LAWlfORD ! KECOVERY OP
i.e., adding more coke to tho charge — would effect a greater dogrou
of reduction and thus increixso the recovery of sulphur.  In practice,
however, although it ia possible that tho amount of reduction in
increased, there is no improvement in recovery for any increase in
carbon beyond about 80 kg.  pov  ton.  Tho total sulphur in tho
j;ascs remains tho same, but with  a different distribution between
tho various compounds ;  S02 in diminished, but CS, and COS are
increased.
  It would seem in fact  that the- CS, and COS in the  exit gases
from tho furnaco are dependent on the amount of coko present, tho
concentration of tho sulphur vapour and the quantity of CO in tho
#ises.  For example, the COS is  formed  by the action of CO on
sulphur vapour  at temperatures  below  800°C.,  whereas  CSj is
formed nearer tho  focus by  reaction  between sulphur and hot
carbon.  The hydrogen sulphido in  tho gases depends very much
upon the amount of sulphur dioxido in tho exit gases and tho con-
centration of water vapour present, n small reduction in tho amount
of sulphur dioxido present  increases the  H4S, tho  increase being
roughly in the proportion of
                                              of  SO, for any
given concentration of water vapour.
  Tho effects of varying the carbon/pyrites ratio (i.e. tho percentage
of coke on tho burden) ion charged par ton pyrite, kg 	
„ CS,
. COS 	
.. ..H.S 	
Total milphur 	
COt Vol. per cent 	
CO 	


1
104-0
39-2
18-0
7-0
0-9
71-7
14-3
0-8
0-5

2
77-3
51-6
5-0
0-2
7-3
71-0
12-8
0-5
1-0

3
61-0
70-8
5-8
4-8
4-8
80-0
Jl-0
0-0
0-8

  The conclusion is,  therefore,  that,  whcro  conditions  make
impossible tho further treatment of the  exit gases,  tho most
                              433

-------
    VBOX BMBtTBn OA8K9 BT THE ORKtA PIIOCE8S AT RIO TISTO 435

economical percentage of coke on pyrite will correspond to about
80-90 Jig. carbon per ton of ore.  Whore, howpvor, gases are free
of arsenic nnd can be subjected to catalysis after  thoy leave the
furnace, the coke can bo profitably increased because tho catalysing
of Gas 1 (Table III) will yield fl total of 84 g. sulphur por cu. m.,
•whereas tho catalysis of Gas 2 would only  yield '21 g. por cu. m.
•In  othor words, with 1,250 cu. m. gas por  ton  pyrites, the extra
27 kg. of carbon would produce an additional 1C kg. of sulphur.
  Tho reactions upon which catalysis of tho exit gases depends are :
     SO.-fCS,  =COZ -f-'S,  	  (6)
     SOl-f 2COS = L>eo, + JS,  	  (7)
     SOJ4-2H,S = 2HsO + iS,  	   (8)
  At Orkla catalysis of tho exit gases has always  boon most success-
fully practised and has resulted in a much higher overall  recovery
of sulphur than has so far been possiblo when treating tho  arsenical
Iberian ores.   Tho precise offoct of arsenic is discussed later.
  Tho type of smelting dono in tho Orkla process is pyritic, as it H
the oxidation of a sulphide  oro, and nearly 70 por cent of tho heat
generated is derived from the oxidation  of iron sulphide.  For the
process to work well and smoothly it is essential that a high rate of
oxidation should bo at all  times maintained and to ensuro this  a
llux containing a high percentage of froo silica is essential.
   From what has  been written it can  bo  inferred that  tho  con-
ventional typo of  wntor-jackotod copper  blast-furnace may  not
b»  tho  most suitable apparatus in which to carry out this process,
in which a  reaction xono 1ms  to bo maintained  at  over 1,200°C.  if
tho sulphur dioxide is to bo reduced in  tho  contact time available.
This unsuitability has boon recognized  for a long time, but so far
the problem  of reconciling  copper  smelting with high sulphur
recovery in ono apparatus  has not,  in tho opinion of tbe authors,
boon fully solved.
   Notwithstanding  all  its admitted   shortcomings,  tho  Orkla
process usos much loss coke per ton of sulphur produced  than any
of  the  other  reduction processes.  The reason, of course, is that
nbout 05 por cont of the sulphur recovered is tho loose atom sulphur
nnd only 85 por cent is derived from tho reduction  of SO., whereas
Jill othor processes first burn  tho raw  material to SO...  Thus at
Hio Tinto slightly over 8 kg. crude sulphur per kg. of carbon  is
obtained, whereas tho theoretical equivalent when reducing S02 by
€ is 2-Gfi; in practice the figure is almost certainly less than 2-00 kg.
crudo sulphur per kg. of carbon.
   The  comparative inefficiency  of S0t reduction in the  Orkla
furnaco is therefore much loss important from tho economic stand-
point than would bo the case  if all tho sulphides in the food to the
furnaco had first to bo oxidized to S02.   This point has an important
hearing on tho treatment of sulphides othor than FoSz.
                     SuLPiiun PURIFICATION
   Tho crudo sulphur coining from tho condensers and mist Cottrells
contains 1-5-2 pnr  cont  of arsenic and 0-2-0-3 per cont of nsb.
                              434

-------
436  H. B. POTT9 AND B. 0. tAWronD : RECOVKUY OF SUtPHUR

Arsenic is removed by circulating milk of Hmo through tho molf.tm
'ulpb'jr in autoclaves.  When llio original experiments wore carried
out to determine tho most efficient method ol refining, various soda
compounds  worn  tried,  with tho idea of forming  sodium  thio-
ixrfioniU.o.   It •wn<» found, that when  caustic soda was used mixad
with lime i\ much quicker  removal of arsenic resulted, but NaOH
tjlwuys gav
arsenic.  It will bo seen from  Table IV that the actual consumption
is  between 1-8  and 2-2 tons  free CaO per ton arsenic.  Thero is
always a portion of tho CaO which fails to react because  it is inort
through being overburnt,  also  calcium  polysulphidcs are formed.
The  treated sulphur  contains some  8 to 10 parts  per million of
ursenic nnd  is pnssed  through ordinary steam-heated filter presses,
these filtors removing the ash so that tho fina. product is sulphur
of high purity.

                 SECTION  2—THE PLANT
  Tho process flow-sheet is comparatively  simple (Fig.  109), and
various sections of the plant will bo described in some detail boforo
proceeding  to (bo  discussion  of metallurgical results.
  Before describing th<» individual units of  tho  plant, a very brief
summary of the sequwu  of operations will  bo given.
  Sulphur-bearing gases from blast-furnaces nro cleaned by passing
through Cottrell electrostatic precipitator units ;  they then pass
first  through condonsors<, where tho  larger  part of the sulphur is
recovered,  and then  through a second  set of  Cottrolls, where a
further recovery of sulphur ii m.a'lo.  Tho rriido sulphur contains
arsenic, which is removed  by a washing process employing quirk
lime.
  It  should  bo clearly understood that tho llio Tinto plant is very
much an improvization and that it certainly cnnnot bo described as
an ideal Orkla process layout.  In this respect  tho  Norwegian
plants  and  that of Minn de S. Domi'igos, 1'orlugal, aro both much
                         435

-------
    rnoM SMBLTBH OASES BY TITE OHKI.A TOOCESM AT mo TINTO 487

superior ixnd it is hopod that n fnll description trill be given during
the discussion of this  paper.   Tho operators referred to had the
advantage of boinp unencumbered with nn existing copper smoltor
JIIK!  RO wore  able  to  bnild  from tho fonndntions  with tbo Orkln
smelting system in view.  At Jlio Tinto, on tho other hand, there
w:w already n Pinoldir ninny  years old nnd in many r«'spt'cl.s already
Miiliqiiiilod, bul. from which tho How of copper had l.o be iniiinliiinrd.
Jt wns, thoroforo, noressury  l.o crcaLu an Urkla Hinvlting plant by a
f
-------
433  H. It. POTTB AND B. O. I.AWPOM) :  HECOVRIIY OF SULPHUR
a i





1*
enw
CO fi
e> 2
jj.
?






.8
||
5 8
S 2
*T **

^ **•*
o ^

i"

















i?
0


k
a
1

V



0
6




2
*.
•s
to


.J

V.



O
H-4
S
W
S



s


!a
^

•e
e
^
1"
u
j S
1

3
s
!^

J
o



,5
Sj.
ftl

!
*-
^








a>  '

c» i O
o 1 in
CO OS
to
IO
10
«•'. 1 1
« I 1
Cl
? 1 1
o 1 1
CO *
10"
CO
10
O CO
IO IO
O



oo
00 O |
tbio '
•* n

«0 IO
'n* CO .
coci 1
M* IO
CO
to



m
V
KARGE
Pyrites 	
Concentrat
Precipitate
0
t-
JO

OS
M4
1
m
cl
IO
1
O
m
S
CO
0
2
1

00
en
o>
Cl


1


e
CO
0
O
CO
o
lr c.'
O l>-
O 00

ss
-8
»•*?>
- to e-<

10
t- •*
•f 1-
ooo
CO
c> o
10 O»
00
oo ci
Cl




i US to
9 1-4 eo
5 Cl

>co t»
> « C-l
i •* to
1 00 C)




bo
a
'Ji
' °«

•*

«.



•H<
S
"•

?,

00
,_
Cl
CO


to
o
O)







n
CO

00


n
j§
w
H



1 1


1 1

1 1

1 1
g.0*
-
IO Cl
r-"ob"

"




SI

_
CO

CO
Cl
1
e>
'8
to
Cl
1
s

2
•«
o
to
f*
1

1-
o
00

CO


1


eo
o
i-

us
o




1



! I


1 1

1 1 1

1 1
"jO-s,
So g«
>o
ta

1 I
1 1
1 1 I

I i
1 1




1 i 1

xP"v
(A *»*ifl





1 Is
:i

° Is'c
« " § 5
•*• fe 8 S
6^1 £

                                437

-------
PROM SULPHUn OASES BY THK OHKLA PROCESS AT RIO TINTO 489
00 CO-" Ok
f gp ' "*
, OOO-J« I I
1 OO CO 00 I |
o cr> co 10 o IN
•* •* Cl iO if O
t-« i-l OO CO C4 P-
cb co" 10
coo
«?-«?•? 1 1
r- 10 c< o> ' '
O>CN — 1
Ok tf CO CO
*-» OS CO I— I |
coco_io_co_ 1 |
!*• IO ^t* CO
o ioco co
IO IO O> Cl
1 '".'"I 1 *
rH
r-»
cfco A
00 CO i-l O O Cl
ci —i co !*< co o
00 — 1 CO — 'O 00
CO Cl IO i— 1 Cl 00
GO CO -H CO
CJ t^ CXN 1 I
i^ co c) -H 1 1
o>e» ci
co oo o O)
CO M* C-l 00 , i
^."."l-i i
00 if3 iO IO
OO CD CO
ft »— < IQ
F4
00
°i
1
0>
o
IO
CO
 o i< ci co
O> O 00 (N CO
CI I CO i-l CI IO
*N 1 CO O -* 00
CP CO i-l
"1 

a c»o oo 00 ^ CO IO OO . CO CO CO C) 00 [ co'co co" O*ef CO CO OJ — CO * "* °* 1 0 *» * H-Jj ? 1 ^c5 "^'? 1 1 £ M ,? * 5 CO t- C- CO CO •*r oo -i 10 oo CO i O_ lO^COCO^ 00 O M CI | <3> ~o2 I i- 1 c» ~Tci 10 ' a> <3> <>. i-» oo 10 1- oo 10 o 'Ji CM CO CD to i *"1""1 *. e'l."H 1 OO 00 CO O O) CO «0 00 X, p- 1 •— « 2 -It, E 03 c FA o q ^ 1* H &.I tfpj« o^ "-a * S| § a 1- «| k •JjE-S o3 jS*!^ ijjOh-l p;W >(\A< phur entering tho furnaces in tho two periods, 15,927 and 11,117 tons of sulphur arc from when refining sulphur which do not represent fresh sulphur entering tho process. n tho pyrites and concentrates and perhaps from the converter slag and matte. om the above-mentioned four materials only, the sulphur recovery ia ; 1934-1939 133.360 _ „.,„ „_ 5"3 5 c e °!£ f J Il| I o £ 5 .a O S O j_ £ a .a 1 S i^j S5" -^t: » i I I S « = & 8 2 °^ - s A j: « ~ o< o -^^2 0 Hfc s i i, * S, 5 I? S : I 3 S « 1= S 7 = •§. 3 7 "317 ^Isi S | " 3 2. -5 ««. n>7 C) 12 •« i c J- § « o e> o c> •O a S 1 o f. I V 'J o o _>» »• ° . 3 -B *? s s s i £ 5 | e. ! i S i t « P « 3" O«; r- 01 ,2 O 0 ** 5 eT 7 1§-^ S SSg O^ w> p-, C^ 00^ *• 0^ ^-i (D »-* 2. b ;2. fc ° C T* 27 25 "~ 0 t_- — l-« 438


-------
 440  n. n. POTTS AWD 8. o. &AWFOITD : nECOVunv OF mn.rmm

 idenl sites and properly connected to the furnaces but  on situs
 dictated by the availability of space in the existing plant.
   There is  no doubt  that  the ideal  layout  consists of smelting
 furnaces each  coupled  to its own dust procipitator and  sulphur
 condenser, all  precipitators and  condensers being placed  as close
 ns possible to  the furnaces.  It will bo seen from the description
 which follows  how very far it 1m been necessary in tho present,
 cn=e to depart  from thin ideal.
                        Bl.AST-FunXACES
  Three out of the  original six  open-lopped furnaces have been
 modified to nllow sulphur recovery ; tho first being No. 6 fnrnaco,
 the most easterly one and,  therefore, nearest to the hot Cotlrolls.
 Tho conversion of Nos.  5 and 4 furnaces followed later.   Tho dates
 upon which  these three furnaces were first blown in after being
 modified were  :  No. C, I Aug.  1MO : No. 5, 5 Sept. 1932 ; No. 4,
 10 Feb. 1942.
  Tho normal  copper-smelting furnace is preserved in its  usual
form  up to tho level of tho charging floor, but  instead of  tho top
 being left open and charging effected through  side doors on the
level  of the charging doors, the (op wns heightened, completely
closed in, and  equipped with four sets of doublo-vixlved charging
bells,  very similar to the gas-tight, bulls used on tho normal iron
blast-furnaco;  by this  means charge can bo introduced into the
 furnace without allowing tiny access of atmospheric air.  l''ig. 110
 (Plate XXI) shows the  const motion.
  It will bo seen from Tnblo V  t.lmt tho dimensions of tho three
furnaces are not identical.   All of them have tho same height.'and
use standard  12-ft.  side jackets, but the rake of the  jackets is
 different, being much greater in No. C ; this largo flare was origin-
ally given with the idea of reducing tho gas speeds in the  furnace
and  thereby effecting  a better  reduction of SO^;  the  authors
think that in many ways No. G  has  been  consistently the most
satisfactory furnace,  perhaps  because, having  tho shortest flue
connecting it with tho hot Cottrolls, less back pressure is developed
and a faster smelling rato results.  However, the wide flaro has
the. disadvantage of needing specially largo, non-standard end and
breast jackets. Tho jackets :•'•(> all  made  entirely  by  electric
welding, tho fire sheets " ->ing of a Jj-in. mild steM,  and tho back
xheots of -ft-in.  Tho 12-ft. jackets  nro satisfactory on  tho  open-
topped  furnaces, but they are not  sufficiently  stiff to  resist  the
heavy thrust imposed  by an Ift-ft. charge column and  they tend
to buckle, even though  they are roinhict'd by  tlirec heavy buck
stays  bolted across f-iirh side of the  furnac<'.  Leading  particulars
aro given in Tablo V.
  Tito upper part of nil tho furnaces, abovo tho jackets, is supported
 on a framework <>f box girders and consists of a steol box welded at
 tho joints.   This in solidly  lined with  ISin. ot good-quality Jiro-
 brick ;  the roof of tho furnace between the charging bell* is formed
 by an arch made of carefully cut- and lilted lire-brickH.  Tho fttrnnco
                           439

-------
    TROM 8M1!T,Tl?n OA8EB BY TltB ORKIA TBOCFSS AT RIO TINTO 441

                             TABLE V
                             Ko. 6 Furnace       Ifo». 4 and 5 Fitrnaix*
•Length	  18ft.                 18ft.
Number of charging bolls ...   4                    4
Height from closed  bolls to
  floor 	  21 ft. 7 in.            22ft.
Height from top of jnokots
  1o roof	  10 ft. 2 In.             Oft. 11 In.
Width nt top of jackets  ...   0 ft. 4 in.             fi ft. 15 in.
  11    t> toyorca  	   4 ft, B in.             3 ft. 5 in.
Hearth nrcn	  82-0 sq. ft.            01 nq. ft.
N'imbor iif tiiy«ro»	  30                   30
Dinmolor of tuyeres 	   4 in.                  4 in.
Ttiyftro nrot»	   3-l4«q. ft.            :M4sq. ft,
Jtivtio—Hearth  to  tuyoro
  urea	  20 to 1               19 to 1
Hoii>ht o,/l of tnyta* to floor   2 fl." 0 In.             2 ft. 0 in.
Number of gos ports	   ft                   18
Height of pns portd	   1 ft. 0 in.             I ft.. 4 in.
Width of gns ports	   3ft.                  7} in.
Total nroa of EOS port* 	  22-5 sq. ft.            14-4 sq. ft.
Number of Hiflo ji\rltots	  12                   12
Diinrntinn* of side jacket*...  12 ft.. 3} in. by 3 ft.    12 ft. 3} in. by 3 ft.
J'lnro of jnnkotH from rontro
  linn of liiyorra	   1 ft. in 2 ft.           1 ft. in 4 ft.'0 in.

bottom in put. in with ono lowor row of firebrick nnd an upper ono
•of  magnosito  brick  ; tho use of  firebrick  alono for tlio furnncr
bottoms  has  boon found unsatisfactory, becamo of tho  scouring
vlTccl of U\o Ring.
   Tho praclico of lining tho inner side of  tho water jackets com-
pletely with good-grade firebricks for (ho full height of tho jacket,
baa  been made  standard  in  the Norwegian  plants,  upon tho
supposition that this will maintain a higher  temperature next to
tho jacket and therefore load to better reduction of S02, and also
that tho hot surface of tho brickwork may have a catalysing effect.
This  lining has been tried onco or twice ivt Rio Tinto, but its uso
has been discontinued for many years past,  as it was found  that the
lining is soon fluxed away, leaving the jackets bare ngnin.
   Tho gases leave tho  top  of tho  furnaces  through ports  and arc
 plant, but because of the exisling layout of tlui
original  furnace  plant (hey nro unavoidable.   They  form a great
iilmtuclo on (bo  fiirnaco feed Moor, hindering ready access to the
furnaces ; (hoy  also slowl) fill up with a layered deposit of dust

                           END  OF COPY
                                440

-------
                             APPENDIX W

                  FW-BF DRY ADSORPTION SYSTEM66'67

W.I  HISTORY
     A 20 MW demonstration FW-BF dry adsorption system was put into
operations at the Scholz Steam Plant of Gulf Power Company near
Sneads, Florida by Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in 1975.  The
technical basis for this system is derived from a license with
Bergbau-Forschung GmbH, the research grouo for the German Bituminous
coal industry.  The basis of design for both the Gulf Power Demon-
stration Unit and the STEAG Demonstration Unit at Lunen, West
Germany, is the very extensive work done by Bergbau-Forschung over
a two year period at their pilot unit at Welheim, Germany.  This
plant ran for one continuous period of 6,000 hours, and the results
of the two year testing period were published in 1970 at the Second
International Clean Air Congress in Washington, D.C.
     Bergbau-Forschung is presently ooerating a demonstration plant
for the desulfurization of flue gases.   The plant accepts 88,275 cfm
of flue gas in the form of a slipstream from a 350 MN coal fired
boiler owned and operated by STEAG at Kellermann Power Station in
Lunen, Federal Republic of Germany.  This prototype demonstration
unit consists of an adsorption section, a regeneration section and
a modified claus unit for reducing S02 to elemental sulfur.  The
demonstration unit at Sneads, Florida consists of an adsorption
section, a regeneration section and a RESOX* unit for reducing S02
to elemental  sulfur.
*Trademark of Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation,

                                441

-------
W.2  DEVELOPMENT OF THE FW-BF PROCESS
     The S02 removal  system developed in the laboratories of
Bergbau Forschung in Essen, West Germany is based on and designed
                                       CO
for a special  activated coke adsorbent.     The activated coke, the
most critical  ingredient in the system,  is characterized by
excellent SCL  adsorption, high ignition  temperature, and good
physical strength and is the result of a research and develop-
ment program initiated in the late 1950's.
     The basic system consists of a gas  solid contacting device,
the adsorber,  and a regenerator which is the desorber.  Figure W-l
shows the schematic of the adsorption section.  Within the adsorber
         r
the activated  coke moves downward in the plug flow contained by
permanently fixed steel louvers on the gas entrance and exit sides
of the unit.  The polluted gas stream is passed in through the
louvers, through the adsorbent and out of the adsorbent through
louvers on the opposite side of the adsorber.  The SO^ contained
in the gas stream is initially adsorbed  on the inner surface of
the activated  coke and undergoes subsequent oxidation to sul-
furic acid in  the presence of the oxygen and water vapor also
existent in the polluted gas.  Coincidentally, the adsorber also
adsorbs NO  and functions as a panel bed filter for the removal
          A
of particulates entrained in the gas stream.  The sulfuric acid
content of the activated coke increases  as a function of coke
dwell time in  the adsorber; therefore, the coke discharged at
the bottom of the adsorber contains the highest possible amount
of sulfuric acid for the given conditions and adsorber geometry.
     After the adsorbent discharged from the adsorber is
separated from particulates by a vibrating sieve, it is regener-
ated.
     The regeneration  is effected thermally by heating the sul-
furic acid loaded adsorbent in an inert atmosphere.  The condi-
tions of regeneration are selected to be sufficient to cause a
directional change in the driving forces governing the reactions
in this system, whereby the participants undergo a modified
                                442

-------
 activated coke
 from regeneration
                         from  the power plant
                                to the stack
                               blower
   to  regeneration
Figure W-l.   Adsorption  Section - Lunen
                      443

-------
reversal of the adsorption reaction, resulting in the reduction
of sulfuric acid by the fixed carbon of the adsorbent to yield
sulfur dioxide.
     The regeneration is carried out in a moving bed reactor
utilizing sand as a direct heat carrier to heat the adsorbent
to around 650°C (1200°F).   The effluent gas of the regeneration
contains 20 to 30 percent sulfur dioxide by volume and also HLO
and C02.  It can then be fed directly to Foster Wheeler's RESOX
process for its sulfur dioxide content to be converted to sulfur.
     The RESOX process uses coal as a reducing agent to pro-
duce elemental-sulfur.  It was developed in Foster Wheeler
Corporation's John Blizard Research Center, and is the result
of a research program initiated at the end of the 1960's.
     The process is designed to reduce sulfur dioxide contained
in an offgas stream to sulfur, and to condense the so produced
sulfur product from the gas stream.  The RESOX process is
capable of handling a wide range of inlet gas compositions,
and does not require gas cleaning, drying, or dust removal systems.
Crushed coal is the only material and the only catalyst consumed
in the process.  The process itself represents a new way to
achieve the desired degree of reaction between sulfur dioxide
and crushed coal at temperatures as low as 650°C (1200°F).
     The major process equipment consists of a reactor vessel
and a sulfur condenser.  In the reactor vessel sulfur dioxide-
rich gases are reacted with crushed coal to yield gaseous elemental
sulfur.  This  sulfur is condensed from the gas stream in the sulfur
condenser.  The high purity liquid sulfur effluent of the process
represents a non-polluting by-product.

W.3  PROCESS CHEMISTRY
     The process chemistry of the FW-BF Dry Adsorption System
for the Adsorption, Regeneration and RESOX sections are described
below.
                                444

-------
     The sulfur is produced in the form of a gas which is sub-
sequently condensed.  The nitrogen and carbon dioxide constituents
of the Regenerator offgas pass through the RESOX reactor without
taking part in the reactions.
     The process configuration for the FW-BF Dry Adsorption
System at the Scholz Steam Plant is shown schematically in Figure
W-2.  The system is installed on Boiler No. 2, a nominal 40MW
pulverized coal-fired boiler,  which has been retrofitted with a
sectionalized, high efficiency electrostatic precipitator capable
of 99.7% particulate removal.70
     The system is sized to handle one-half of the total flue
gas from this boiler.  The 20 MW equivalent in flue gas entering
the system is 85,600 ACFM.  The flue gas leaving the boiler air
pre-heater is at a maximum of 350°F.  The system is nominally
designed to meet Florida SOp reduction codes of 1.2 Ib. SO^/MMBTU
heat input which equates to a 74.5% removal efficiency require-
ment for 3% sulfur, 12,200 BTU/lb fuel.  The actual performance
of the unit during initial operation far exceeded this requirement.
     The equipment utilization and operation of adsorption,
Regeneration and RESOX sections is discussed below.
     Adsorption is accomplished by passing the flue gas horizon-
tally through vertical columns of activated char in the adsorber.
Scholz Steam Plant Demonstration Unit adsorber consists of two
vertical stages of char beds designed in a modular fashion.  There
are eight 6' x 6'  beds in the first stage and four 4' x 4' beds
in the second stage.  All beds are approximately 40 feet high.
     The char in the beds is continuously recycled.  A conveyor
at the top of the adsorber feeds regenerated char into a holding
tank which has discharge tubes that gravity feed the regenerated
char into the individual char beds.  The char moves downward in
mass flow adsorbing S09 and NO  as it travels.  The char flow
                      c.       A
                               445

-------
                                       CD
                                       C
                                       o
                                       CL
                                       S-
                                       o
                                       to
                                       CO
                                        I
                                       CM
                                        I
                                       o>
                                       S-
446

-------
rate is controlled by a vibromagnetic feeder at the hopper out-
let below each char bed.  The saturated char is collected at
the discharge of these feeders and sent by a combination of
natural frequency conveyors and bucket elevators to the regen-
eration section of the system.
     The flue gas entering the adsorber is tempered, if neces-
sary, by the use of a dilution air fan (vane axial  type) which
maintains an inlet flue gas temperature of approximately 140°C
(284°F).  The adsorber discharge fans, one per stage, restore the
pressure drop suffered by the flue gas during its passage through
the adsorber and associated ductwork.
     The regeneration section provides for the continuous on-
site regeneration of char which has been loaded with SCL in the
form of H?S(L.  Regeneration is achieved by contacting the load-
ed char with hot sand.  Sand is utilized as an inert heat transfer
media and as such does not take part in the reactions occurring
within the regenerator.  Its sole function is to supply heat so
that the reactions may take place.  The mixture of hot sand and
char at 650°C (1200°F) flow slowly downward through the regenerator.
Their flow is controlled at the discharge of the regenerator by
a char-sand separator-feeder.  The char and sand are physically
separated by means of a vibrating screen deck.  The char is spray
cooled to 220°F and returned to the adsorber.  The sand is conveyed
to a fluidized bed sand heater where heat is added by direct com-
bustion of No. 2 fuel oil.  Both the char and sand streams are
closed loop operations.
     The flue gas produced by the fluidized bed sand heater is
used to preheat the incoming combustion and fluidizing air to
this heater.  After preheating the incoming combustion air, the
flue gas goes to the boiler air preheater flue gas inlet for
additional heat recovery.  It is then injected into the main flue
gas stream entering the adsorber, thereby assuring closed loop
operation of this gas stream.
                                447

-------
     The RESOX section provides for the continuous on-site
reduction of sulfur dioxide to elemental  sulfur.   The low
volume S02 rich offgas stream is directed from the regenerator
to the RESOX reactor which is filled with crushed coal.   The SCL
stream is reduced to gaseous elemental  sulfur and the liberated
oxygen combines with a portion of the coal  carbon to form carbon
dioxide.  The gases leaving the reactor enter a sulfur condenser
where the sulfur is condensed to molten elemental sulfur.  The
sulfur is collected and stored in an insulated tank (which is
equipped with steam heating coils to make up for heat losses
through the insulation system) to maintain the sulfur in a molten
form pending shipment via tank truck.  The mass-flow coal move-
ment through the reactor is controlled by a discharge feeder.
The combination of non-consumed coal and ash is fed into a
receiver vessel for ultimate disposal after cooling.  The tail
gases leaving the sulfur condenser consist of CCL, FLO, N,, and
those remaining "S" values not converted to elemental sulfur.
The gases are recycled to the boiler via a centrifugal blower
where the sulfur values are oxidized to S02 and then re-enter
the adsorber allowing complete closed loop operation of the unit.

W.4  PW-BF SCHOLZ STATION DRY ADSORPTION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
     During the start up of the Lunen demonstration unit, some
mechanical problems were encountered in the adsorption and the
regeneration sections.  But according to Mr. W.F. Bischoff of
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation,   the adsorption and regen-
eration sections are reasonably well optimized now.  He adds
that the only major problem existing at Lunen is the proper
functioning of the modified Claus unit.  Foster Wheeler is cur-
rently  looking for funding to install a RESOX unit to replace
the Claus unit at Lunen and then test the integrated system.
                   72
     Foster Wheeler   reports the power consumption for the
whole system to be between 0.6 and 1.5 percent of steam generator
name plate rating depending on the system design and the mode of

                                448

-------
operation.  Another point of interest is the S0? removal efficiency.
Removal efficiency is a function of several parameters including
SCL concentration at inlet, inlet flue gas temperature, char dwell
time and gas residence time.  In the brief period of operation
with diverse operating conditions, S02 removal efficiencies were
between 96 and 100 percent consistently.  Another point noted
during the operation was that the exit gases from the adsorber were
0 to 30°F higher than inlet to the adsorber, thereby increasing
the buoyancy of the stack gases.
     Based on present information the FW-BF Dry Adsorption
System appears technically feasible but requires full-scale
operating time and data to prove itself.
                                449

-------
                            APPENDIX X
           SULFUR/SULFURIC ACID PRESENT AND FUTURE USES
                            AND MARKETS
X.I  SOURCES
     Over the past centuries, there have been many fundamental
changes in sulfur/sulfuric acid supply sources.   Early  civiliza-
tions obtairfed their meager requirements from native  sulfur
deposits in  or near volcanoes.   The increase  in  demands in  the
late 1700's  and early 1800's was largely satisfied by the devel-
opment of native sulfur deposits in Sicily.   Monopolistic prac-
tices by the Sicilians, which resulted in exorbitant  price  levels,
caused consumers to shift to pyrites as their major source  of
supply during the second half of the 1800's.
     For many years pyrite, iron disulfide, was  the main sulfur-
containing material in the manufacture of sulfuric acid.  In
1895, Herman Frasch developed his process for extracting sulfur
from underground deposits by injecting hot water into the deposit,
melting the  sulfur, and recovering it in liquid  form.  The
exceptional  purity and quality of sulfur appealed to  the chemical
industry, particularly to the manufacturers of sulfuric acid.
As a consequency, Frasch's sulfur supplanted  practically all  other
raw materials formerly used in the manufacture of sulfuric  acid.
The development of the Frasch process for mining the  large  native
sulfur deposits associated with the salt domes in Texas and
Louisiana created a new and important source  of  high  purity
elemental sulfur for domestic and world markets.  As  a  result, the
United States became the world leader in sulfur  production  in
1913, and it has never relinquished this lead.
                                 450

-------
     Frasch sulfur and pyrites have continued to maintain their joint
predominant positions as world sources of sulfur to the present time,
but they are being rapidly challenged by new sources of sulfur pro-
duced as co-products or byproducts.   The trend started  about  1950
with rapid increases in the production of elemental  sulfur at
refineries and natural gas treatment plants  and of byproduct  sulfuric
acid at nonferrous smelters.  The pyrites sector of the sulfur
industry is being seriously affected by the  latter developments.

X.2  PRESENT USES
     Sulfur is unusual as compared with most major mineral com-
modities in that by far the largest portion  of it is used as  an
intermediate in the manufacture of other chemical products.
Sulfuric acid is the most important of these intermediate
products.  Ninety precent of the sulfur consumed in the
United States in 1975 was either converted to sulfuric acid
or produced directly in this form.  Other intermediate products
were carbon disulfide and sulfur dioxide, each of which accounted
for 3% of the total sulfur consumption.  Only 4% of the total con-
sumption was used directly in the elemental  form.  The use of
sulfur in U.S. by end-use categories is as follows:
     • Agriculture (Fertilizers) - This category is by far the
most important, accounting for 55% of domestic sulfur demand.  The
principal individual requirement is for the  manufacture of phos-
phatic fertilizers, with sulfuric acid being the essential inter-
mediate sulfur product being used.  Another individual, but
relatively small, end-use within this category is the production
of ammonium sulfate by the reaction of sulfuric acid with ammonia.
Additionally, a small amount of sulfur in elemental form or in the
form of gypsum is used as a soil conditioner and plant nutrient.
This latter use of sulfur is growing in importance because the
higher grade phosphatic fertilizers now being produced by the wet
phosphoric acid process do not have the needed sulfur content that
was a component of the older, lower grade fertilizer products.
                                451

-------
     • Plastic and Synthetic Products - This category covers  a wide
range of synthetics including acetate, cellophane,  rayon,  and various
products, fibers and testiles.   The sulfur intermediates involved in
their manufacture were equally divided between sulfuric acid  and
carbon disulfide.
     • Paper Products - In this category,  the largest single  segment
of demand is in the manufacture of wood pulp by the sulfate process.
In this process, the major sulfur intermediate is sulfur dioxide,
generally produced at the plant site by burning elemental  sulfur,
although some sulfur dioxide is produced as a byproduct at smelter
operations, purified and liquified, and shipped to  the pulp mills.
     •  Paints - The major sulfur use in this category is for the
production of titanium dioxide pigment by the sulfate process.
Difficulties in the disposal of ferrous sulfate waste product has
led to the development of the hydrochloric acid process.
     • Nonferrous Metal Production - This category  covers the leach-
ing of copper and uranium ores with sulfuric acid.   In the case of
copper, it is used for the extraction of metal occurring in deposits,
mine dumps, and wastes whose copper contents are too low to justify
concentrations by conventional  floatation techniques, or for  recovery
of copper from ores containing copper carbonate and silicate  minerals,
which generally cannot readily be treated by floatation processes.
The sulfuric acid required for copper leaching is invariably  the
byproduct sulfuric acid produced by the copper smelters in the area.
     Sulfuric acid is the most commonly used reagent for the
recovery of uranium from ores.   The sulfuric acid used is either the
byproduct sulfuric acid produced at smelters or sulfuric acid pro-
duced from elemental sulfur.
     • Explosives - In this category sulfur is used entirely  in the
form of sulfuric acid.  Sulfuric acid is not only used in direct
manufacture of explosives, but numerous related nitration processes.
                                 452

-------
     • Petroleum Refining -  This category includes not only
petroleum refining as such, but associated chemical processes
where process streams may serve both the refinery and the chemical
complex.   The major idetnified end use for sulfuric acid is as a
catalyst for alkylation, a process by which liquid high-octane
gasoline components with very good stability may be produced by
a combination of gaseous streams.  Sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric
acid are competing catalysts in this process.  Sulfuric acid for
refinery processes is manufactured from recovered sulfur produced
at the refinery and from contaminated acid (acid sludge) returned
to the acid plants for reconstitution.
     • Iron and Steel Production - Sulfuric acid is used as a
 pickling agent to remove mill  scale, rust,  dirt,  and grease from
 the surface of steel products  prior to further processing.   The
 sulfuric acid pickling process faces increasing competition from
 hydrochloric acid, largely because of the problem of disposing
 of the ferrous sulfate waste product.  Although there are both
 advantages and disadvantages in the use of hydrochloric acid,
 it appears that it will largely replace sulfuric acid over the
 long range.  There is no well-defined source of sulfuric acid for
 steel pickling since it is generally obtained from merchant
 sulfuric acid plants that use the cheapest form of sulfur avail-
 able in the area in which it is produced.
      • Other Uses - This general category covers a wide variety
 of end uses, including intermediate chemical products.  These
 miscellaneous uses, especially those involving sulfuric acid, are
 intimately associated with practically all  elements of the nation's
 industrial and chemical complexes.

 X.3  NEW USES FOR SULFUR73'74
      For some time now, organizations in the sulfur industry have
 been involved in the development of new uses for sulfur.  The re-
 search is directed towards the developments of new uses that would
                                453

-------
(a) consume large volumes of sulfur,  (b)  are  economically  favorable
to attract industry interest and  capital,  (3)  are  non-polluting,
and (d) are not costly to produce.
     One of the major developments  for new uses  in recent  years
has been that of a sulur-asphalt  paving material called  "Thermo-
pave" by Shell Canada.76'77  The  product  contains  13%  sulfur,
6% asphalt and 81% sand,  and possess  considerable  commercial
acceptance.  It is economically attractive, has  superior properties
when compared to the conventional asphalt-aggregate paving materials
and would use large amounts of sulfur.
     A foam which is lighter than water with  compressive strength
 comparatively higher than  that of  typical  organic  polymers has
                     78
 also been developed.     Its potential  uses are, for instance,
 thermal  insulation and general building insulation.
      The manufacture of  sulfur concrete involves  the mixing of
 molten sulfur (350°F)  with sand  or aggregate, in  the ratio 30:70,
 and then letting the mixture cool  and  harden, either to form
 bricks,  blocks, tiles or other structural  materials.  Other
 potential uses of this product are concrete  pipes, slip-forming
                                       79
 of street curbs, traffic barriers, etc.    Indeed there is a huge
 potential for exploiting and establishing  markets  for such a
 product, but as yet it is  still  in the early stages of  development.
      Research in various other uses  of sulfur has been  carried
     80
 out.    Included in these  are:   (a)  the  use  of  sulfur as  a coating
 material providing resistance against  corrosion and errosion,
 and (b)  as a surface bonding material, providing  a hard and
 impervious surface on a  wall that  would  not  require mortar or
 joining material between blocks.
      However, while some of these  products have already been
 developed and tested successfully, it is  highly unlikely  that
 any of them will be commercially produced on a  significant scale
 prior to the end of this decade.   It should  be  noted  that the
                                 454

-------
research in the development of new products  such as  discussed
above was stimulated by the prospects of a sulfur surplus.
     The use of sulfuric acid injected directly into the soils
                                81
in Arizona looks very promising.     This procedure tends to  break
up the adobe soil  as well  as decrease the pH to a more  favorable
range for agriculture.   Yields have definitely increased and it
is considered one of the promising future potential  markets.
Approximately 4,000-5,000 tons per month of  acid are presently
being used for this purpose.

X.4  PRESENT PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
     Sulfur in its different forms is produced worldwide with no
 one country being a producer or supplier to world markets.   In
 1974, world production of sulfur in terms of sulfur content of the
                                              82
 product produced amount to 50.9 million tons.     The United States
 was the leading producer, accounting for 22% of the output.  A
 tablulation of world sulfur production in 1973 and  capacities
 for 1973, 1974 and 1980 is shown in Table X-l.   The total U.S.
 production of sulfur in 1975 was 11.26 million tons.   The salient
 sulfur statistics for the years  1971  to 1975 is given  in Table X-2.
      Sulfur for domestic  consumption was obtained mainly from
 domestic sources:  Frasch 45%,  recovered elemental  27%, and sulfur
 in other forms 10%.   The  remaining 18% of the sulfur was obtained
 by imports of Frasch and  recovered elemental  sulfur.   In 1975,
                                                            go
 Frasch sulfur accounted for 64% of the domestic production.
 Frasch sulfur was produced at 13 mines in Texas and Louisiana.
 Duval Corporation, with one mine in Texas,  Freeport Minerals
 Company, with four mines  in Louisiana, and  Texas Gulf, Inc., with
 five mines in Texas and one mine in Louisiana, accounted for most
 of the Frasch production.   The  five largest mines,  with a production
 rate in excess of one-half million tons per year each, accounted for
 84% of the total  Frasch sulfur  output.  They also accounted for 54% of
 the total  production of sulfur  in all  forms during  1975.
                                455

-------
      Recovered elemental  sulfur accounted for 26% of  the  total
                                                   84
domestic production of sulfur  in all  forms   .   It was produced
by  fifty-six  companies at  140  plants  in  28  states, one plant  in
the Virgin  Islands, and one in Puerto Rico.   Most of  the  plants
were relatively  small  size, with only five  of them reporting  an
annual  production exceeding 100,000 tons.   By source, 55% was
produced by  38 companies  at 79 refineries or  satellite plants
treating refinery gases,  and two coking  operations,  and 45% was
produced by  29 companies  at 59 natural  gas  treatment  plants.
     Table  X-l.   WORLD SULFUR  PRODUCTION 1973 AND CAPACITY 1973,
                    1974, AND 1980

                                    (Thousand long tons)
                                            Produc-
                                              tion       Capacity
                                              1973   1973    1974   1980
                      North America:
                         United States 	 10,921   12,000  13.000 15,000
                         Canada 	  7,779   8,000  8,000  7,000
                         Mexico	  1,650   1,900  2.500  3,000
                         Other 	   100    200    200   200
                          Total 	 20,450 22,100  23.700  25,200
                      South America	—	   300   400    600   1,100
                      Europe:
                         U.S.S.R 	  7,500  8,000  8,500 12,000
                         Poland 		  3,600  4,000  4,000  4,000
                         France 		  2,000  2,500  2,500  2,500
                         West Germany	  1,050  1,200  1,400  1,600
                         Spain	  1,000  1,200  1,400  1,400
                         Italy	   800   900    900   900
                         Other			  2,700  3,000  3,300  3,800
                          Total 		 18,650 20,800  22,000 26,200
                      Africa		   600   700    700   800
                      Asia:
                         Japan		   3,000  3,500   4,000  5,000
                         Near East			   1,250  1,500   2,000  5,000
                         China --	   1,200  1,300   1,300  1,800
                         Other	    250   300    300   400
                          Total 	-	   5,700  6,600   7,600  12,200
                      Oceania 	    300   400    400    500
                          Uorld Total	  46,000 51,000  55,000  66,000
                               Source:   Ref. 85
                                        456

-------
              Table  X-2.   SALIENT  SULFUR STATISTICS
              (Thousand  long  tons, sulfur  content)
Production:





Shipments (Sold or used):

Byproduct sulfuric acid 	


Imports:


Pyrites (Canada) 	
Total 	
Exports :

Crude, recovered elemental, from the
Virgin Islands 	
Apparent Consumption 4,':

Recovered elemental




Other forms I/ 	

Yearend Producers1 Stocks 5/:



1971





	 9,580


	 518


	 9,280



	 130
	 1,429



	 1,536


	 1,582



	 126


„„ • A1-S
	 97
-— L i ?n


1972
7,290
1,950
546
283
149
10,218
7,613
1,927
546
283
149
10,518
269
868
1
50
1,188
1,847
5
1,852
5,761
269
1,927
869
546
283
50
149
9,854
3,665
131
3,796

1973
7,605
2,416
600
212
88
10,921
7,438
2,451
600
212
88
10,789
302
905
15
1,222
1,771
5
1,776
5,662
302
2,451
920
600
212
88
10,235
3,816
111
3,927

1974
7,901
2,632
654
162
70
11,419
7,898
2,547
654
162
70
11,331
954
1,194
2
2,150
2,580
21
62
r/2,663
5,297
954
r/2,485
1,196
654
162
70
1/10,818
3,744
213
3,957

1975
7,211
2,969
767
237
75
11,259
6,077
2,902
767
237
75
10,058
967
930
y
1,897
1,288
7
57
1,352
4,782
967
2,845
930
767
237
75
10,603
4,857
269
5,126

r/  Revised.
I/  Hydrogen  sulfide and liquid sulfur dioxide.
27  Less than 1/2 unit.
3_/  Accounted for as Frasch sulfur.
ftj  Measured  as shipments, plus imports,  minus exports.
_5/  Reported  producers' stocks after invertory adjustments.
Source:   Reference 86
                                     457

-------
     Sulfur contained in by product sulfuric acid produced  at
copper, lead and zinc roasters  and smelters  during 1975  amounted
                                                              87
to 7% of the total  domestic production  of sulfur in all  forms.
It was produced by  12 companies at 22 plants in 13 states.   Twelve
acid plants operated in conjunction with copper smelters, and  10
plants operated as  accessories  to lead  and zone roasting and
smelting operations.  The five  largest  producers of byproduct
sulfuric acid were  American Smelting and Refining Company,  Magma
Copper Company, Kennecott Copper Corporation, Phelps Dodge  Corp-
oration, and St. Joe Minerals Corporation.  Together, their 13
plants produced 68% of the output during 1975.
     Contained sulfur in pyrites, hydrogen sulfide, and  sulfur
dioxide amounted to 3% of the total production in all forms during
     QQ
1975.    Pyrites were produced  by three companies at three  mines
in three states; hydrogen sulfide by four companies of five
plants in four states; and sulfur dioxide by two companies  at  two
plants in two states.  The three largest producers of these
products were Cities Service Company (pyrites,  hydrogen  sulfide
and sulfur dioxide), American Smelting  and Refining Company
(sulfur dioxide), and Shell Oil Company (hydrogen sulfide).
Together, their one mine and five plants accounted for 93%  of  the
contained sulfur produced in the form of these products.
     The trends in  the sulfur industry  in the United States for
the past twenty-five years is given in  Figures X-l, X-2,  and X-3.
The sulfur produced and shipped from Frasch  mines in the United
States, by-product  sulfuric acid produced in the United  States,
and pyrites, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide sold or used  in
United States is given in Tables X-3, X-4, X-5, and X-6  respectively.
The trends in the sulfur production and consumption in the  United
States for the past twenty-five years is given in Figures X-2  and
X-3 respectively.  The sulfur supply-demand  relationships and
end-use for the years 1964 and  1974 is  given in Table X-7.
                     92
     Arthur D. Little   gives the U.S.  sulfuric acid capacity
for 1975 in Table X-8.  As indicated in Table X-8, U.S.  sulfuric

                                458

-------
    c
    o

    a
    c
    o
   u.
   3
             — < — \ — \~"\  i   I  I  I  I  i  I  I  i   I  I  I  I
                                                         I  I    i
       19SO
1955
                             1960
1965
                                1970
1975
                               198C

c
"5 o
11
" 1
S g

O. *o
•u
50
40
30
20

10

0


9
F.O.B. mi"e or plont .*^t A
- „ 	 x* \ /
.^•n*««»w ^ ^ *
,«>•» "••«*,•** *% ^

-
(ill
1 1 1 ' 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I J 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1




1 I 1 1
        1950
                  1955
                             1960
                                       1965
                                                 1970
                                                            19X5
                                                                      1981
         Source:  Reference 39
Figure X-l.   TRENDS  IN THE  SULFUR INDUSTRY IN  THE UNITED STATES
                                   459

-------
o
o
c
JO
o
t/l
                                           Domestic fraseh
                                                                           i  i	(
    1950
1955
                             1960
                                        1965
1970
1975
1980
o
|
a
u.
_l
100
 90
 80
 70
 60
 50
 40
 30
 20
 10
                                           Domestic frasch
         Domestic other forms
      UtlllllMintlMIIMItllllllll	Illllllt

        r^-T--r-T""r i  i   ]
                  Imports
                                                Domestic recovered
    1950         1955         1960
       Source:   Reference 90
                          1965
                                                       1970
                                                                 1975
                         1980
    Figure X-2.  TRENDS IN THE  CONSUMPTION OF SULFUR IN THE  UNITED  STATES
                                          460

-------
 .0
 1
 =>
                                          Recovered
            Other Forms
                                        _J	I  I   I  I  !  I  I
     1950
               1955
                          1960
                                     1965
                                                1970
                                                           1975
                                                                      1980
   100
   90
   BO
   70
   60
   50
   40
   30
   20
   10
                Frotch
Other Forms
                             Recovered
                              1  J  II  I I   I  I
                                              j	I   i  i  i	i
                                                    j	i	1
    1950
               1955
                          1960
                                     1965
                                                1970
                                                           1975
                                                                      1980
        Source:  Reference  91
Figure X-3.  TRENDS  IN THE PRODUCTION  OF SULFUR  IN THE UNITED STATES
                                       461

-------
UJ
£
^^
CO

a
uf

i— i
z
=>

UJ
mr"
£
^"•^
Z 
I-H S-
ro
OOr-
Ljj r-
Z O
1-1 -a
•o
31 C
o ro
oo 
5 ~*
U- -C
•M
ll
1 1 f0

O CO
UJ C
0- O
a. 4->
oo c
o
O i—


O 3
=3 0
a j=
§t

o.
a;
ii
_i
Z5
OO

ro
i
X

at

_a





n
c
a
e
•H

CO













iction
>-f
•n
o
M
*





















"1
a)
,3
(4
>




^
4J
•H
4J
S
3

^*



^•^
•-•1
r-l
cd
O
H

1

3
O

01
s
01
H










at
4)
SH





sr m
O1 CO
00 CO
f*. CM

iH i-l






CO CO
r*^ ^o
VA f^
*w r^





in o
CM &
0 CM
r> r—


\O -4-
i-l co
vO i/l
CO CO



00 >O
O in
m, «
CO CO

1 1
1 1
! i
1 1
j j
j I
j j


1
iH CM
r^ r»
H H




CO O CO
m o oo
•M <->.•&
CO *f O
^ CM CO






oo oo r*
-* 00 O
rx r*. \O






m rH iH
0 O r-l
SO O>. CM
r<- r^ r»


rH 00 O
1-1 ° C
ro ro ^y
f^ CO fO



ST CO iH
C\ ON -4-
» M 0
<»• *T -*

1
j
! i
i i
i i
1
j
j
i
j
j
co -^ m
l-H r-< H











•
2
£
•o
g
0

^J
B
s
T3
C
0)
a,
4)
•o
^H

O)
u
1
q-
(U
a:

* •
a>
u
i-
3
O
«/)
462

-------







CO
UJ
r™
^t
CO

0
UJ
1—
IJ
iff
^3
UJ t/>
re j-
,—
^P» _„
i-i 0
•o
o
UJ -O
a. c
o. to
•— i 
CO O
._ "^
E~ T*
^z
^C "O
O (O
UJ
O (/)
o o
O +J
a:
a. a>
c

ID f~-
1 1

CO 
[^
H


(0
~J
id  00
-» O 00 ui CO
r^ O r» O 
»-l  f^ rH CM
ON t-l CO -» VO
*. * * A
iH tH F"! t—l
•»^
rO|




CO O\ vO tf\ O4
en H •* r-i -s-
NO 00 O CM Cl
f~4 tH rH


1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
: : : i
! ! i i
I I I !

i
i i i i i
i i i i i
tH CM en •» IA
C< ON S\ ON ON
r-l t-l t-l rH iH















,
00
•H
•O
C
3
O

4J
41
•O
4>
S*
1
•rl
O
0)
3
•O

|
01
01
,_!
o
u
o
4J
1
JJ
g



(d
4J
«t
Q
	
























.
m
§
***!


-------
 co TO
U- UJ CO TJ M
i tij X; c *J
=> < o * C
co j— .c _ J5
" * *" "*"* W CX
~~  )^ (/)
—1C cu u
=> Z O Q. C
co i— 1 1— o. nj
O iH
h- T3 U O.
O C
=> (O
O CO
O 3
f\^ O
a. ^=
i i—
OQ


LO
1
X
» in o \D
C7\ C^ P^ f*^ l^
CN OO H ro CTi
* " " " *
«N T CD l/^ vD
m 10 vo vo r-»








-* H 0-4 rH vO
oo i/> oo oo  rH
CO OS rH ^» CsJ
«M CM  in


1
















i— I CN ro 
rH t-l r-| rH ^H























CO
cu
4J
CO
4J
C .
• CU M
CO O 3
C9 O rH
fH 0 3
M CO
CU CO
w cu  en
B -H -H cr>
J^ 4J
fi >> n) nj
60 a d o

-------
              a>
              3
                              O r» co 01 t^
                              co e-4 oo m cr>
                              m «M ^H o O
                               •>  •»  •*  *»  *
                               o> r*. vo t^
                    t-j
                    vr
                    - co a  c
a: rs M-  o
       i— -M
  «o; 3
co o co  en

^—• (^     ^J

Qi O    '"'
>- CO    -O
Q_         C
    LU     ra
  • O     
                                                    cu
                                                    o


                                                    o
                                                    CO
                              ON
                                    r^. r-
                                    ON ON
                         465

-------







T-
•^
UD
2
A
CO
0-
1— 1
3:
CO



1— «/>
«C c
_J O
LU 4-5
O>
O E
2 O
LU ~o
0 C
i re
Q. O
Q. .C
CO 	
ID
ii
_J
CO

*
1
X
Ol
XI



£
-
0

»
R
*•
£
O)

1
-
s
*~

i



s

i

I

1











O)
£
-
O
o
00
**
o
c
o>

CO
o
ff
0
U)
CM
*
ci
o
CM
CO
*-"
CO
sS
01 O>
CM
m 

§

CO

§
a
8
«'
o
rt
§
S S *
*• *- o*
^ N ™
»~ CM 
-- III ftl
o •-' V
§ss
Ol r-* CO

K r^ co
m 10 co
in cq rt
01 - CO
in in in
XOt if)
fw UJ


in « •{
 ^-" co"
co" »-" V

88.8
K »• •»
K K
5
h«" CO" CM
S 8
0. 01
tft n
«) K
tf> CO
fc
K
*•"
2
"~
I
0
s
CM
0
J
CO.
O*
+

|


S

§ ISS?
«r ^
""
» «
t CO
r.

3
*"
oi

a
oi


P

s 85*?
o n

9 18
„  *•






CM 
¥ ft
*H **
"~
sig
O*l»»" +

St 8|








_r »- . o
Wo 9 "i
S 3 | 3 °> -j
s -. e s ;3 <
J O y M *. M

(£ Soil |i
f S
U O










1
*
UJ




m ^r
y> xJ
rJ 1










j
£


§289885^8
Oi
* CM

S888SSSSR!
^« mcO'»C'JCM«-'-CN(
V CM


in Q !'^r<>
v, *n^incocM»-CM —
^ CM
u>w>* S CM R * CM o»
o »•"

eo" ^



^
s
•5
T

^ I
~ S o
H
o
X

o
CD
O>
O
O)

S
Ol

o>

&
o>


a
Ol
?
Ok
i

in
r*.





5
a
c
^ 1 ?'
1 Is >.
1 -«i ^
s •* ; s 1
I IfliflpSfe I
i V^iL5l?ZuS^5O
w























*
2
w
i
i
X
1
•s
§ , 	
i O
« o;
(0 O
=> C
S S_
i ^
2 Ol
i Qi
1 «
•6 O
^ 3
O
3 CO
466

-------
     Table  X-8.   U.S0 SULFURIC ACID CAPACITY - 1975
   Producer                                  Annual Capacity
                                             (Thousand tons)
A.  Northwest                                     2,158

B.  California                                    1,702

C.  Southwest                                     3,787
                        (Western U.S.Subtotal     7,647)
D.  Other U.S.                                   38,748
                                                 46,395

Source:  Reference  102
                           467

-------
acid capacity in 1975 was approximately 46 million tons.   The
vast majority of this capacity (84%) is in the Gulf Coast and
eastern U.S.  The Northwest, the Pacific Coast, and the Southwest,
together accounted for only 16 percent of the U.S. sulfuric acid
capacity.
     United States Department of Commerce in their Current Industrial
       93
Reports   report sulfuric acid production in U.S.  by area for the years
1973 and 1974.  This production distribution is given in Table X-9.
     There are a wide range of government programs that are designed not
only to increase the production of sulfur but to protect the environ-
ment from the effects of sulfur dioxide emissions  and to develop new
                                               94
uses for sulfur.  The Bureau of Land management   has a leasing
program for native sulfur on public lands in Louisiana, New Mexico,
and the outer continental shelf.  The Office of Minerals Exploration
lends up to 50% of approval costs for sulfur exploration.  The Bureau
        95
of Mines   is conducting research on the recovery  of sulfur from
smelter gases and industrial stack gases.  The Department of Energy
is doing extensive research and development on gasification and
liquefaction of coal.  The sulfur recovery potential from these
processes would be very great if commercialized.  The Environmental
Protection Agency has a wide range of research programs primarily
aimed at reducing sulfur dioxide emissions.  The Bureau of Mines
has a research program aimed at developing new uses for sulfur of a
magnitude that would alleviate a potential over supply problem.

X.5  FUTURE MARKET PROJECTIONS
     World sulfur or "brimstone" trading is expected to maintain a
steady growth between 1977-80 to reach 21,2 million tons.  The higher
rate of growth up to 1980 is largely attributable  to the anticipated
recurrence in the strength of demand from the fertilizer industry.
Almost 57% of the projected 12.7 million tons increase in brimstone
output between 1976 and 1985 is forecast to be in  the form of recovered
(not mined) sulfur.     In fact, for the first time recovered sulfur
output will exceed that of Frasch and native refined sulfur.
                                 468

-------


Z3
(O

p
a


•

a
i.



•r
g
«
«
a
IN
r

•
t
7
•4
t
j
S

PI
S
•rt


i
:

I
•
a*
|
.
«
f
O
*ff
!S
r
IN




•
p
J
O) V Ol
1* aff ,TI
!r*  t* 01
48 rt V
t« tO *


?
1
1 " t
^1 ."
e *
C f 1
if ;
•i
 o in r- o
(0 ?i If N * N Is1
ip H m H N f-i n
«oaDaeti»orsAO)«r» o
HsSslpsss i


	 A
MMiiiJi
::::»£:,•
JilBis^ai"1-
i 5S=*Jis*3< ]
ssSS

w o * n
§;«g



....
• S u.!


• 2
SS

•* *» a
! |5
i "i
I i1.
ause of independent rounding J
•rated plants-
chusetts, and Rhode Island.
inneeota, Iowa, and Kanaas.
a, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missll
nt«na, WyosUnc, New Mexico, rt
iirurvs Bay not add to totala bee
r Government-owned, privately op
ir plants located in Maine, Ha*aa
>r plants located In fti«oonsin, H
ir plants located In West Vlrglnl
r plant i located in Colorado, Mo
,4 «*«**•*•«»
* slllll

                                                                                                              CO
                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                               
-------
     Canadian and French recovered sulfur output is  projected
to decline by 2.2 million tons but this  fall  will  be more  than
compensated by an increase of some 3.9 million  tons  in  the Arabian
                             105
Gulf recovered sulfur output.      Frasch and/or native  sulfur mining
in Mexico, Poland, Iraq and the USSR will  maintain a steady growth.
The brimstone supply/demand situation in the  1980's  may give rise
to large scale exploitation of sulfur deposits  in  other areas,  such
as Bolivia.
     In the September 27, 1976 issue of  Chemical Engineering,    the
conflicting views of experts on the sulfur supply  and demand
situation in the coming years is presented.   Marked  change in the
balance of supply of brimstone from mining,  hydrocarbon sweetening
and pollution control, as well as restructuring of the  market for
the material, complicates sulfur's outlook over the  next decade.
     Controversy over sulfur is not a new phenomenon.   While the
material finds customers in a broad range of sectors within the
chemical process industries and elsewhere, its  demand has  remained
cyclical, tied to the fortunes of the key-market-phosphatic
fertilizers.  Now, the picture is clouded by a  number of new
factors.
     On the surplus side:  existing world stockpiles of a  record
26 million tons of surplus sulfur; the likelihood of large ton-
nages of recovered sulfur being produced in the Middle  East as
a result of sweetening operations at natural-gas-exploitation
project underway there; the probability  of more sulfur  being
recovered as a result of U.S. and Western European environ-
mental legislation targeted at power-plant stack-gas emissions;
the virtual certainty that more high-sulfur crude will  be  proces-
sed in the U.S.; and the expected growth of recovered sulfur
supplies following commercialization of projects for synthetic
natural gas, coal liquefaction, shale oil and other alternative
               107
energy sources.
                                470

-------
     On the shortage side:  predicted declines in sulfur associated
with dwindling gas-fields in currently strong producing areas such
as France and Canada; doubts about the rate of growth of recovered
sulfur in the next decade; lack of strong economic incentives for
continued growth of Frasch (mined) sulfur production in U.S.;
reservations about the marketability of small tonnages of recovered
sulfur from scattered individual sources; and rapidly inflating
capital costs for Frasch facilities, recovery units and shipping
                   I QQ
and transportation.
     On the consumption side, some of the sectors in industry will
cut their sulfuric acid requirements and consequent demand for
suflur.  In the wood pulp industry, there is a swing to making less
use of the sulfate process.  In the paint industry, there is a swing
to making titanium dioxide pigment by the chloride route, phasing out
the sulfate route (with its byproduct problems).   And in steel pickling.
hydrochloric acid is rapidly replacing sulfuric acid.
     One expanding industry that will call for more sulfuric acid
is non-ferrous-metal production (especially copper and uranium),
where annual growth of sulfur demand will probably hold at 4.2%.109
Most of the sulfuric acid in the copper industry will come from
recovery plants at the smelter.
     Recovered-sulfur output figures are a strong factor support-
ing theorists who predict a surplus.  In the U.S., according to
one industry source, elemental  sulfur from petroleum and natural
gas operations may mount to 4.6 million tons annually by the end
of the decade and continue to grow in subsequent years, perhaps
reaching 4.9 million tons/hr by 1985, in another, more conservative
estimate.110
     But at last October's London meeting of the European Chemical
Market Research Association, Martin Horseman, a director of the
British Sulfur Corporation (London) reported that the world growth
in recovered sulfur would be far less spectacular during the next
ten years than it was during the 1965-74 period.      He added that

                                 471

-------
between 1975-85, sulfur production from hydrocarbon process  is
anticipated to increase at a rate of some 3.6% per annum,  compared
with a rate of 11.7% per annum between 1965-74.
                              112
     Texas Gulf's Rittenhouse,    speaking at a May meeting  of the
U.S.'s Chemical Market Research Association (CMRA) predicted that
byproduct sulfur production in U.S.  may total only 8 million tons/
yr as compared to earlier preductions of 20 million tons.
                         113
     U.S. Bureau of Mines    on the other hand, is still  confident
that recovered sulfur will continue to carve itself a large  share
of the worldwide market.  Subject to suitable technology emerging,
and continued  environmental constrains, the  Bureau predicts that
co-product sulfur output  in the U.S. will rise from 31% of total
production to  83% by  the year 2000,  accounting for 87% of U.S.
supplies.
     The  big question mark  hanging over recovered-sulfur output
is that  of environmental  legislation.  The  basic  imponderables
here are:  When will  coal gasification start  to make inroads  as
an energy source, and how much  sulfur will  be recovered in a
usable form from stack  gases, rather than lost because of the use
of cleanup technology that  discards  sulfur  values?
          114
     Exxon    estimates that, by 1985, coal gasification will
contribute a maximum  200,000 tons/yr of sulfur, and shale oil will
yield only 100,000 tons/yr because sulfur in shale oil  is mainly
retained  in the shale as sulfate.  Texas Gulf and the Sulfur
Institute are equally pessimistic, seeing these sources developing
slowly, too.   Texas Gulf's Rittenhouse    wonders whether environmental
legislation will have much effect on sulfur recovery at power plants,
since at the present  there are hardly any commercial power plants
that are recovering sulfur.
     Figures from the National Coal Association (Washington, D.C.)
based on Project Independence projections, show that 1985 total
coal consumption will reach 1,140 millon tons against 1975's
620.2 million tons. Electric utilities will be burning at least
                                 472

-------
715 million tons/yr of coal in 1985, and more probably as much
as 826 million tons, says NCA.  But how much sulfur will be con-
tained in the coal, or how much of this material will actually
be recovered, no one is inclined to speculate about.
     Canadian sulfur production, from Western Canadian sour-gas
plants, will decline as a major source, all authorities agree.
Output of Canadian sulfur peaked in 1973-74 at just over 7 million
tons/yr, and fell in 1975 to 6.5 million tons.  Production will
drop to 5.7 million tons/yr in 1980 and 3.7 million tons/yr in 1985,
Texas Gulf estimates.   The chances of new discoveries halting this
slide are slim too.
     The impact of increased Middle East recovered-sulfur output
is difficult to estimate.  Projects to harness previously-flared
natural gas will start up in the 1980's, turning out large tonnages
of sulfur too.  In Saudi Arabia, for example, Aramco plans sulfur-
                                                          118
recovery facilities turning out 7,000 tons/d.  Rittenhouse    pegs
current production in the area at 1.4 million tons/hr, mostly in
Iraq, which has a domestic Frasch industry, and Iran.  He estimates
that production should double by 1980 and that by 1985, output
could be as much as 4.0 million, but will certainly reach 3.0
million tons.
     The U.S. Frasch industry has viewed the growth of recovered
sulfur with concern intensified by soaring Frasch process energy
costs, and increasing capital costs for new mining and trans-
portation facilities.   Increasing costs or exhaustion of reserves
have closed ten mines in the 1970's, including five within the
last year.119
     Predictions for future Frasch output vary, but none are
                                120
optimistic.  According to Exxon,    U.S. Frasch production may
fall to 6.6 million tons/yr or less by 1985.  Another source
predicts an even sharper falloff:  output at 7.4 million tons/
yr in 1980, dropping to a tentative 5.7 million tons by 1985.
                                    121
The views of Westinform Service Ltd.    on sulfur also tend to
support reduction or minimum expansion of Frasch.
                                473

-------
     Forecasts of U.S. and rest-of-world sulfur demand for 1985
and 2000 is given in Table X-10.  The U.S. sulfur demand in 2000
                                                    122
is forecast to range between 18 and 26 million tons.     The
probable range within this range is set at 14.5 million tons in
1985 and 23 million tons in 2000.  This represents a probable
average annual growth rate of 3%.  The growth rate of the probable
demand in the rest of the world is expected to be somewhat greater,
about 3.7%.  This faster rate is due to relatively more rapid
industrial  expansion in the developing countries  of the world.
In summation,  the most probably  world demand in  2000 is estimated
to be 110 million tons at a growth  rate of 3.5%.
         f
     The demand forecasts for domestic end uses  are shown  in
                                                               124
Table X-ll.   They were developed by U.S.  Department of Interior
by applying the growth rate of selected economic  indicators to  the
patterns of end uses and projecting to 2000 to establish a  fore-
cast base for each use.   The economic indicators  used for  estab-
lishing the forecast bases were  as  follows:  phosphate rock con-
sumption in fertilizers as an agricultural  indicator; population
as a paper products indicator; and  the Federal Reserve Board
Index of Industrial  Production as an indicator for all  other  end
uses.   In the case of paints, and iron and steel  production,
neither a forecast base or forecast range was established  because
it is anticipated that these uses will  be phased  out by 2000.
     The sulfur supply pattern is expected to be  drastically
restructured by 2000.   Production from primary (Frasch) sources
will be gradually phased out and replaced by production from
                                         125
environmental-related co-product sources.      Table X-12 shows
an assessment of domestic co-product sulfur production and
potential for 1974 and 2000 by seven types of sulfur sources.   For
1974, it includes the actual production from these sources and  the
estimated potential  capability for production.  For 2000,  it
includes an estimate of the probable forecast production from an
estimated potential  capability for production.
                                474

-------
o
o
o
cvj

CO
U.
00

a
 I
u_
o


is:
*«!
 • o ?
oo $-£.
 • 3
Z3 O
   OO
00

oo

5
UJ
a:
o
O


>-
oo
x

a>
                 §.§  §|  |§

                 w ?5  co o  *- rt






                 ?8"  S'8  SSJ
                  »-   H   to




                 88  88  83
                  ^  ^ h.  V- r~
                       *
                 I
                                     o
                                     o
                                     o
                                     PJ

                                     TJ

                                      (O

                                     CO
                                     r*.
                                     en
                                     LU
                                     00
                                     oo
                                     oo
                                     00

                                     o
                                     LU
                                     •-3

                                     §
                                     a.
                                     X

                                     
-------
O (O f-
O ••- 1—
O 4-> -i-
CM c .a
 Q.
z o (d
> o
o^ **"**
i— 0
CVI
o c
U_ +J O
_i IS -Jj
4 * * • % »^_
p • ^"* T^ ^^^
I— c ^a
o en 0 1— 3
v_^ T3
r- 0
0 S-
=3 Q-
O
Q£
a.
1
O
O

CM
'T
X
(U

JD






0 O 0 0 0 0 O
O O CM CO LO <3- VO
vo r^ ^^ o^ LO n^
»l •» »t *t
O CO i— CO
CO








o o o o to LO LO
O O O LO O CM CVJ
CM LO r— LO LO r-
* A *\ *
CTl LO r- CO






0 0 0 0 O 0 0
O CD 00 r**> O CD VJD
CT^ r*x CM CO CO
•t *t A fv
O LO r— r—







CM CO CM CM CT« LO
1 VO i — LO M- CO
<• CM LO CM
rt n
^~ ^^



o
o
f—
*l
LO
^~








o
o
o
#*
o
CVJ





o
o
CM
9*
o
CM






CO
r-"~
IT)
n
en




i/)
$_
3
M-
lo
W) i — I —
fO fO '^
E to +J +*
3 0)0
tt) r— E 1—
•— (0 S-
2S- 
 O. C «O -C
O O> «O O -i- (!) 4->
u a. z o M _i o
























CT^


»
M-
Q^
a:

O)
o
S-
3
o
00
























476

-------
     The forecast production for 2000 is based upon the ongoing
development of the required technology for the production of
marketable sulfur or sulfuric acid from the various sources, and
environmental restraints that will enforce the production of
these sulfur products regardless of normal economic considerations.
During 1974, the co-product sulfur production was only 17% of the
potential capability and ranged from nothing (in case of coal) to
                               I p£
95% (in the case of nature gas)     By 2000, it is forecast that
this type of sulfur recovery will  increase to 44% of the potential
capability.  It will range from 30% of the estimated potential
capability for coal to 98% for natural gas.  Coal is clearly
indicated as being the principal source of co-product sulfur in
2000, accounting for 46% of the estimated forecast production,
followed by petroleum with 27.5%.127
     In 1974, coproduct sulfur production accounted for 31% of
the production of sulfur in all forms and met 32% of U.S.
       128
demand.     By 2000, it is projected that co-product sulfur pro-
duction will account for 83% of U.S. sulfur production in all
forms and supply 87% of U.S. demand.  With forecast domestic co-
product sulfur production amount to 20 million tons per year by
2000, the remaining 3 million tons per year required to cover
domestic requirements can be obtained as domestic native sulfur
by the Frasch process, by imports  of recovered elemental sulfur
from Canada, and by importing Frasch sulfur from Mexico.
     The foreseeable changes in the sources of future sulfur
production have important implications that concern both producers
and consumers.  It will certainly  change the existing marketing
patterns and price structure to a  point where they will be entirely
different from what they are now.   It is predicted that the net
effect of these changes will be to break down the sulfur-producing
and sulfur consuming industries into regional segments, each with
its own supply-demand relationships that will be largely independ-
ent of other regions.
                                477

-------
     Westinform Service Ltd.  (London) in a report entitled
            129
"Sulfur '85"    predicts an acute brimstone shortage of 8.8
million tons, almost 15% of the potential  demand, by 1985 due to the
inability of producers to match a rapid growth in world demand.
They add that constraints on  Canadian exports may cause this deficit
to occur even earlier perhaps by the late 1970's or early 1980's.
The world brimstone shortage  by the regions for 1985 is given in
Table X-13.
     The tight brimstone supply conditions can be expected to give
rise to a  rapid increase in demand for imported sulfuric  acid of
smelter or pyritic origin, and/or the resurgence in the use of
pyrites and hence trading in  pyrites.  It is  predicted that sul-
furic acid trading could increase from 1.5 million tons in 1976
to 2.1  million tons in 1980 and 6.3 million tons by 1985.

      Table X-13.  WORLD BRIMSTONE SHORTAGE BY REGIONS:  1985
     West Europe
     East Europe
     Africa
     Asia/Oceanic
     South America
     North America
     Middle East
         Total
Volume (1000 tonnes)
      2608
       259
      1140
      1564
       939
      1984
       325
      8819
                       Source:  Ref. 129

     Cost and Pricing
     Operating factors in the sulfur industry are diverse be-
cause of the widely differing manners in which marketable pro-
ducts are produced and sold.  Basically, the industry is divided
                               478

-------
into two sectors.  In one, the production of sulfur is the sole
objective, as typified by the Frasch process; in the other, sulfur
or sulfuric acid is recovered as a byproduct or coproduct, as in
the case of the natural gas, petroleum, and nonferrous smelter
industries.
     The Frasch sector of the sulfur industry is based on the
orderly exploitation of discreet deposits of native sulfur, with
the objective of obtaining as nearly a complete recovery of the
resource as economic conditions will permit.  This requires an
assured market and a stable, viable price structure that will be
attractive to both producers and consumers.   Under normal  conditions,
the assured market is based on the relatively close proximity of
these deposits to the Nation's fertilizer production centers, and
the availability of cheap water transportation to these points.
     The major items of operating expense in Frasch production
are the fuel  for heating the process water,  chemicals for treat-
ing (softening) the water, and the cost of drilling wells for
extracting the sulfur.   The major possible constraints to a
sustained orderly development of the Frasch  sector of industry
would be a long period  of depressed prices and a continued in-
crease in fuel prices.   This would restrict  production to the
higher grade sections of operating properties, and the lower
grade ores probably would be lost.
     The operating factors in the co-product sector of the
industry are much more  complex.   This is because the sulfur
revenues represent only a small  portion of the revenues from the
primary mineral production.   In  fact, the sulfur production may
be enforced by the need to remove sulfur from the primary pro-
duct so as to be able to market  it or by environmental restraints
on the release of sulfur compounds.  Additionally, there may be
no ready market for the sulfur or sulfuric acid that may be
produced.  Under these  conditions, the economic desirability of
producing sulfur may be subordinate to the necessity of producing it.
                               479

-------
     The major expense in the production of co-product sulfur is
the amortization of the large capital expenditures required.
Operating costs will range from low to medium, depending upon the
type of feed to the recovery plants.
     The U.S. Bureau of Mines in their Mineral Industry Survey
gives the average net shipment value f.o.b. mine/plant for Frasch
and recovered elemental sulfur of $45.63 per ton in 1975.  The
year-end price for Frasch sulfur was $65 per ton.  There were
corresponding increases in both export and import prices.  The
average sales value of shipment of Frasch sulfur f.l.b.  mine for
both domestic consumption and exports during 1975 rose to $50.16
per ton.  The average price of recovered elemental  sulfur was
lower than Frasch sulfur.  As a nondiscretionary byproduct, there
was a general tendency for the industry to sell  in  local  markets
at prices that were competitively lower than sulfur from other
sources.  Prices varied widely in different regions of the nation
as a resulf of these competitive factors.  Reported unit shipment
values of recovered sulfur f.o.b. plant in 1975  were $36.14 per
ton.  The time-price relationship for sulfur from 1954 to present
is given in Table X-14.
     The prices of sulfur and sulfuric acid as reported by the
                                                   130
Chemical Marketing Reporter dated October 25, 1976,    are as
follows:
     • Sulfur crude, molten, f.o.b.  vessels, Gulf port - $60-61/ton
     • Canadian f.o.b., Alberta for U.S. delivery - $25/ton
     • Dark sulfur, Ex-Tampa, Florida - $65-66/ton
     • Sulfuric acid (100%)
          East Coast - $47.70-53.25/ton
          Gulf Coast - $44.95-50.25/ton
          West Coast - $49.75-55.307ton
          Other areas - $32.60-53.40/ton
     These prices are not firm indicators of actual prices paid,
however, since discounts, variability in credit terms to buyers,
                                480

-------
Table  X-14.   TIME-PRICE RELATIONSHIP FOR SULFUR
                          Average annual pnce. dolltrt per long ton
              Ye«r       	
                           Actual prices     Constant 1973 dolars
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975'
1976 • (first quarter)
26.65
27.94
26.49
24.41
23.82
23.46
23.13
23.12
21.75
19.99
20.19
22.47
25.77
32.64
40.12
27.05
23.14
17.47
17.03
17.84
28.88
46.50
55.00
45.67
4744
43.50
38.62
36.76
35.60
34.57
34.10
31.70
2876
28.64
31.30
34.92
42.83
50.59
32.55
26.42
1907
17.96
17.84
2618
3872
4355
        • Estimate   • Prelminary.
        ' Frasch and recovered sulfur.
                         Source: Ref.131
                        481

-------
and service fees combine to determine the realized price available
to the producer.  Local  situations can result in lower prices.
     Sulfuric acid production has primarily been sited adjacent to
the consuming industries it serves.   Because of the high shipping
costs relative to the price of sulfuric acid, most sulfuric  acid
is consumed within several  hundred miles of the producing point.
Only with the recent advent of regional  inbalance in sulfuric
acid supply and demand created due to the stringent air pollution
regulations and high Frasch sulfur price, has more distant rail
shipment and to some extent, ocean transport, became more important.
     The selling price for acid can vary considerably depending
upon the seller's situation and also the buyer's.  In the case
of the seller, if acid is being produced as a resulf of pollution
control  techniques then  the quantity available for sale is dependent
upon production of other products rather than the acid market.   Thus
if the seller can arrange for a long term (and usually low selling
price) contract, he would prefer this rather than trying to  change
his customers depending upon the acid market price at any current
time.  As mentioned, the cost of shipping sulfuric acid is very
high in proportion to the selling price and therefore, its shipping
range is limited.  Currently 500 to 1,000 miles is the maximum
shipping range.
     The smelters in the southwest of the United States are sell-
ing acid in the $8-15 per ton range.  Long term contracts and/or
increased acid availability could reduce this price.  Smelter
utility and refinery acid projected increase in supply seems to
indicate reduced prices unless proposed market demand and/or
Frasch sulfur prices change considerably.
                               482

-------
                            APPENDIX Y
         BACKGROUND MATERIAL, ASSUMPTIONS, AND CALCULATIONS
                      FOR BLENDING SCENARIOS
 Y-l   REVERBERATORY FURNACE S02 OFFGAS CHARACTERISTICS
      Reverberatory SOp offgas concentrations fluctuate due to inter-
mittent calcine charginq.  The amount of fluctuation varies from
smelter to smelter depending on both age of smelter and local smelt-
ing practice.  Since this report deals with a new smelting unit, it
follows that many of the problems with older smelters will be elimi-
nated, i.e., excess air dilution, large fluctuations, leaks,  etc.  As
a result, the fluctuations will  be minimized while S02 offgas strengths
will be slightly increased.
     Hith the above in mind, it was decided to choose an example
smelter that has minimal  fluctuations and higher S02 strengths to
serve as a model for the RF offgases used in this study.  The Onahama
in Japan is reoresentative since it was constructed relatively re-
cently.  Although they process green charge, the RF offgases  were
used to serve as a basis for the new smelter considered in this study.
By using a green charge smelter, larger S02 fluctuations might be
experienced than would be the case for a calcine charge RF.  However,
this tends to add conservatism for the S02 profile chosen for this
study.
     Figure Y-l shows the actual  S02 emissions from the Onahama
smelter versus time.   As can be seen, these fluctuations are  not as
great as some (see text,  Figure 2-4).
     Figure Y-2 shows a rough aonroximation of such emissions that
were made so calculations could be carried out more efficiently.
                                 483

-------
     The above figure (Y-2) was used to calculate emissions from the
new smelter under consideration for this study.  Since the adjusted
Onahama's average S02 concentration is 2.5 percent, the average con-
centration chosen for this study (1 percent) was scaled down by a
factor of 2.5 percent to be more representative of U.S. practice.
The results are summarized in Table Y-l.
                                 484

-------
                                     (O

                                     >
                                     sr   rd
                                     o   s-
                                    •r-   0)
                                     co  -Q
                                     CO   5-
                                    •r-   <1J
                                     E   >
                                    uj   oj

                                      CM
                                    O
                                    OO
                                     a;
                                     o

                                     0)
                                    o.
                                     cu
485

-------
t-     
                          €
                                              S
                                              vo

                                              o
                                              m
                                              U3
       "X~
    v^
                     o
                     s
                     s
                                              o
                                              r^
                                              n

                                              o
                                              o
                                              n
o
r-
CN

o
T
CM
     U-
                                                      01
                                                      4->
                                                      3
                                                                 C
                                                                 o
                                                                 tO



                                                                 X
                                                                 o
                                                                 S-
                                                                 Q.
                                                                 Q.
                                                                 O)
                                                                 CO
                                                                 s_
                                                                 0)
                                                                 (O
                                                                 O)
                                                                 o
                                                                 (S)
                                                                 (O

                                                                 
                                                                 CD
                                                                 oo
                                                                 
-------
O
o:
o.

  CXI
o
OO

CO
<
CJ3
O

>-

o
UJ
CQ
OL
 I
>-
JQ
 03



a
CO


a:
LU
LU
z:
CO


a
o









z:
z.
o






c
CU CM
PS
CU

trt

e 3
r- 1-
c
CU CM
0 O
S- CO
cu



cu

•r- C
"5
•u
c
CU CM
u o
cu
Q.
wl
cu
g£
i- C
s:
+J
c
01 CM

cu
CU 4->
I- E
^~ *r-


O
,—




o

3
o




LO
I-.


o
LO
CM

O

CO
CM

LO
1*^



O
,_




o
CM
CO
o
r-





O


r—
co
CM

O
CM
OO
LO
CM


O
r~ •


S;
o




o

S
o





o
CM

CM
•d-
CM

0

CO
CM
CM


O
CM


cn
o
,_




LO
CM
CO
O
r_





CO


CO
CM

LO
CM
00
LO
CM


LO
t-~


CO
oo
o




o
CM
CM
cn
o




LO
CM


LO
CM

0
CM
CO
CM

LO
CM
r~~


00
cn
o




LO
CM
g
o





o


$
CM

LO
CM
cn
CM


o
^—


cn
oo
0




LO
CM
o
,_





o
CM

CO
CM
CM

LO
CM
LO
CM


O
CM


O
, 	




0
"3-
cn
o




LO
i-^


0
cn
CM

o

CO
CM

LO
PN.
r—


co LO cn LO
o cn oo o
i— O O •—




O LO O CO
CO i— i— «J-
OOi— LOOCOOOCO^J-r- COr-CMCO
ocnooocoor-ocoocno
r— Or— r- r— Or— r— r—Or— Or—




LO
LoooOLOOLOoooor^LO
CMCMCMCMr— CMi— CMCOCMi— r—

LO 00 CO CM
CO CO CM CO
CM CM CM CM

O LO O CO
CO r— r— ^~
en r^ CM cnoiLO^trOLoroi— LO
COCMCOLOCOi — COOOLOl — COCOVO
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCSJCVICMCMCM

CO
co o o o LO o co o o o o r** LO
CMCMCMCMr— CMr-CMCOCMi— r—










^.
^





LO







LO
00
CM


LO


                                            487

-------
                           APPENDIX Y-2

CALCULATED GAS CHARACTERISTICS FOR ONE CONVERTER  CYCLE (11  HOURS)
        FOR SCENARIOS  HANDLING RF OFFGASES  IN A FGD SYSTEM

     Table Y-2.  BLENDED:   MHR + RF (02 ENRICH) +  CONVERTERS
     Time
    (minutes)  Vol - S02
 Time
(minutes)  Vol - S02    S 02
                                 488

-------
Table Y-2 .   BLENDED:   MHR + RF  (02  ENRICH) +  CONVERTERS
  Time
 (minutes)
 Time
(minutes)
                              489

-------
Table  Y-3.  BLENDED:   MHR + CONVERTERS
 Time
(minutes)  Vol  - S02
                                Time
                              (minutes)  Vol - S02     % 02
                      490

-------
Table Y-4.   BLENDED:   (MHR  + CONVERTERS) +  (RF  <   .  • MgO  SYSTEM)
  Time
(minutes)  Vol  -  S02      % 02
                                              Time
                                             (minutes)
                                   Vol - S02    % 02
 i
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 6
 9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16

 II
19
K>
 21
22
 23
 24
25
26
 27
26
 29
 30
 31
32
33
34
35
 36
 37
 36
 39
 40

                                                                    f *
   I'I
                                             J
           WSkc- t^l,
                   &
                        to.-it
                ^L

                        Ml?
  I'fL
Vit.
  :"?
                         <
-------
Table Y-5.   BLENDED:   (MHR + CONVERTER)+(RF
                                       CITRATE SYSTEM)
      Time
    (minutes)
Vol - S02
 Time
(minutes)  Vol - S02    % 02
              /MS ID -
                                                       -5
              l»rjp-¥Ta
                   •Got
                           *
                  J-SSV
              >V
                            'r
                            •i
                  >-Jtol
            «»
           /fi
                           "t
                     7*
                         h'rhJ
                 ?-g?7
                         tft
                         />L»
                         Tr'rD'
                         /K
                                   492

-------
Table Y-6.  BLENDED:   (MHR + CONVERTER) WHEN  RF HAS  02 ENRICHMENT
 Time
(minutes)
Vol - SO,
                                              Time
                                             (minutes)  Vol  - S02    * S02
                                                f?
                                                            $L*L
                                                              lol
                                                                  &
                       ife
                                                                r^
                            J/,03
        /£
                Wefc-k
                     -590
                           LL
                           Li-
                             7*7
                           /b.TJf
                           n-
                           I*
                          1^
                          1±
        tl>
                    _Ll±±
                          m
                          iiA
                                                                     n
                                     493

-------
Table  Y-7.   BLENDED:   (MHR + CONVERTER)+[02 ENRICHMENT)	^MgO SYSTEM]
      Time
    (minutes)
Vol - SO,
(minutes)  Vol - S02     X 02
                                   494

-------
TABLE  Y-8-.   BLENDED:  (MHR +  CONVERTER)+[0? ENRICHMENT)-
                                  SYSTEM]     *•
                                                          CITRATE
 Time
(minutes)
               Vol - SO,
                  Time
                 (minutes)  Vol - S02    % 02
    i
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    U
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    31
    32
    33
    3'
    35
    36
    37
    38
    39
    40
                       .V
                         ifU^-S
                          /Z*ft-tf
JW_
                                                    cJEl
                                                    ^&p
               S'n
                75
              -v
                                     ite
              -fZQ
                        '*'5"
              -Ste
              1-&M
LL
          V ^ifo
                     if Mi
                     ^

                                                              I I
              j^TT
                     /v,/*/
             ±5.k4
              dSfi
                       z£.
              4.-X
                     /a:
                              495

-------
      Table  Y-9  .   BLENDED:   FBR + RF +  CONVERTERS
  Time
(minutes)
             Vol - SO,
             * 0,

  Time
(minutes)
Vol  -  S02     X 02
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 e
 9
10
 11
12
13
14
li
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2!
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40




                                            rf'r-
                                            H£


                      Lief

                                                                 iis



                                                bw
              TT
                  77
                                                    K*A£W


                                                               J8,

/n*te-l
                  7*
                       ,1fr
 4^
                                          mux!-ft\tf

          14
                                            w


                                                            57
                                                        DO
irbUDLJ


                                                            t>t




                                            M
                                           »>-»/>  ft*
                                           i(it&  PT
                       4.


                                                     I*.
                       •<•[•-
                       £g

                                                            71
                                                            i7
                  tel

                      4
                3I7/
                                                               -i"*
                                                            (,*•


                                                            5?
                                                         -
                                  496

-------
Table Y-10.  BLENDED:  FBR  +  (02 ENRICHMENT) + CONVERTER
    Time
   (minutes)
        Vol - SO,
                         XO,
                             Time
                           (minutes)
        Vol  - SO,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36

40
 I
fjf -
                                       'ILl
                                                               ,5?
           (&&
                                           E
                                           £Z
  I-/37
           .•rfl03
Ui
     ii
                                                  I^K>."fl_Dk
                                                              .$7*
                ..,;
                                                         Ob
     /£
                                                   -K/C5
                                                         IB
                   ft,'
                                              4>£H
                                                     *-3Ll
    fA
        iyrt
  W'>7
                                           r7
il£
                   39
                                         -WTtf
                                              M*ft-^
                                                               17
    ^S
                                                  '0
                                                         :?
    M
            f
                                    -CKLii
                                                    .  n-t:
                                                    fH
                                                                •ft
S
     ¥6
  -#9/
        ^
  iHȣj
f
                                       i?-
                                                      r-so?
                                                              7-
                                 497

-------
            Table Y-ll,   BLENDED:   FBR + CONVERTER
    Time
   (minutes)
            Vol  - SO,
  Time
(mfnutes)  Vol - S02     % 02
               f.'LStk
                         m
     H
            i$Wr
            SB
               Z'±.l!L
                Xi
                    li
    ML
                 r2^
              £*'+£
                                                                     i
            $k
            ifauk J- ^
                         ijj

                b'-s
    £
              itt>L'>
                    ti
             tfta -1 *L
                        \ IJ.K
            /J^'
            /^j^T^J j
            /^alfl?!-
                    £2
35
                  s/t
36
37

36
   1
                    if
                         \'-i
39

40
            H*#-\
                                   498

-------
Table Y-12-   BLENDED:  (FBR + CONVERTER)+(RF—«-MgO SYSTEM)
   Time
  (minutes)  Vol -  S02
                                     Time
                                    (minutes)  Vol - S02    % 02
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
li
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
39
40
                                                ^L-
     i$4
      0&
                                                            I  I
           1&.L
    m
           Wi
          IkWL
                        •
            L1A°---.Z
          n*&i
            'tt
           -5
                  3S
           :m.
                      :3
          /a
              c-
    /£
          £L^
      /i
              lT-l>
                  ''i
       iXHi
     #a
                      li-
                       -,\t
                      'Alt.
                     ;EU4
      /^3
                      IT
ill
        _ /^i^^
                 cl
                              499

-------
Table Y-13.   BLENDED:   (FBR + CONVERTER) + (RF——CITRATE SYSTEM)
      Time
    (minutes)
Vol - SO,
X 0,
  Time
(minutes)  Vol - S02     % 02
                                                       1- 5 /t
                                                          ?
                                                                  i
                                  500

-------
Table  Y-14.   BLENDED:   (FBR + CONVERTER  -  ADJUSTED FOR  RF 02
                                ENRICHMENT)
        Time
      (minutes)
             Vol - SO,
                                        Time
                                       (minutes)   Vol  - SO,
 i
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 e
 9
10
 II
12
13
 14
15
16
17
IB
19
30
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
39
40
                                                                   1.10
 /f
l-^ici-r
                                                              /v'
        /'t
             &
                                             '•L&
                     «/ W
                    1 n./
                   fs
                    _&i
                                                w
        '^
  La?
                    -J5
                       r?
                    1 7*P
                           "bffi
1Q\
djti
tk'/ff(
                 W-r
                              fi
               'j&fa
                           i-
        Mr
            ^L
                   ^fda
                    -•5pJ
                      $7
                      /Y
               jftti-i
                           /**•/
       ±»
                           a.
                          3.
                     S
                     'sw
                   JL
                   ^
                                     501

-------
Table Y-15.   BLENDED:   (FBR + CONVERTER)+(FR(0~ ENRICHMENT)——MgO
                               SYSTEM)          L
        Time
      (minutes)
Vol - S02     * 02
 Time
(minutes)  Vol - S02    3! 02
                    :&SS.
                                                
-------
Table Y-16.   BLENDED:   (FBR +  CONVERTER)+[CL ENRICHMENT	^CITRATE
                                   SYSTEM]
         Time
       (minutes)  Vol - S02
                                             Time
                                           (minutes)  Vol  -  S02     X 02
i
2
3
4
i
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
li
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
                                                                'Zli
                  mo-,5
                                                                        li.
          j'/
r.
                               .at>
                              \i-ki
                    I
                                                                       fr.frg
                                *}
                    t&
                  M:
        l-Kt'-A-
\i*>
                             £,:
                      |B/7
                      Eiti
         1C
         o
                 Itsise
                             fML
                             *.<
                     '?/-
                          /
                                     503

-------
                          APPENDIX Y-3

                ASSUMPTIONS FOR BLENDING SCENARIOS
                        (TABLE 6-4 IN TEXT)

           SUMMARY OF ASSUMPTIONS FOR TABLE 6-4 IN TEXT
A.  BACKGROUND

    1.  SO- offgas concentrations are constant for multihearth
        roasters (MHR) and fluid-bed roasters (FBR)

    2.  Offgas volumes are constant for reverberatory furnace
        (RF), MHR, and FBR

    3.  Offgas volumes and S02 concentrations fluctuate for
        converters.  Also S02 concentrations fluctuate for RF.

    4.  FGD concentration systems are assumed to be able to
        process fluctuating offgas volumes and S02 concentration
        and to produce an enriched offgas of constant volume and
        S02 concentration (FGD system design based on maximum
        volume input).  Thus, the offgas volume and S02 concen-
        tration from the FGD system will be based on the average
        offgas volume and S02 concentration processed in such a
        system.  Such offgas characteristics will be based on an
        assumed 95 percent S02 and 10 percent S02 for the citrate
        and magnesium oxide (MgO) system, respectively.  The
        corresponding FGD concentrated $62 product volume will
        be calculated by:


             A (B) ^  = Volume

        Where

             A = Average volume of gas processed

             B = Average percent SO,, in A

             C = FGD S02 offgas percent, and 0.9 = 90 percent efficient
                                504

-------
B.  VALUES USED FOR THE VARIOUS BLENDING STREAMS  BASED ON BACKGROUND
    INFORMATION
Equipment
1 . No FGD Control :
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster
2. No FGD Control:
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster
3. MgO System: No
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster
4. MgO System: 02
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster
5. Citrate System:
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster
6. Citrate System:
Reverb Furnace
MHR
Converter
Fluid Bed Roaster

MAXIMUM
% S02 @ SCFM
M I N
% S02
I M U M
@ SCFM
A
V E
so2
R A
G E
SCFM

No Reverb 02 enrichment
1.14 54,000
5.0 43,000
5.4 122,000
9.1 23,600
0.
5.
4.
9.
86
0
0
1
54
43
40
23
,000
,000
,000
,600




1
5
4
9
.0
.0
.5
.1
54
43
82
23
,000
,000
,000
,600




Reverb 02 Enrichment
1.6 41,800
5.0 42,096
5.4 122,000
9.1 23,100
02 Enrichment
10.0 5,540.4
10.0 19,350
10.0 59,292
10.0 19,328.4
Enrichment
10.0 6,019.2
10.0 18,943.2
10.0 59,292
10.0 18,918.9
No Oo Enrichment
95.0 583.2
95.0 2,036.84
95.0 6,241.26
95.0 2,034.57
02 Enrichment
95.0 633.6
95.0 1,994.02
95.0 6,241.26
95.0 1,991.46
505
1.
5.
4.
9.

10.
10.
10.
10.

10.
10.
10.
10.

95.
95.
95.
95.

95.
95.
95.
95.

2
0
0
1

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

41
42
40
23

4
19
14
19

4
18
14
18


2
1
2


1
1
1

,800
,096
,000
,100

,179
,350
,400
,328

,514
,943
,400
,918

430
,036
,515
,034

475
,994
,515
,991






.6


.4

.4
.2

.9

.48
.84
.79
.57

.2
.02
.79
.46

1
5
4
9

10
10
10
10

10
10
10
10

95
95
95
95

95
95
95
95

.4
.0
.5
.1

.0
.0
.0
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0

41
42
82
23

4
19
33
19

5
18
33
18


2
3
2


1
3
1

,800
,096
,000
,100

,860
,350
,210
,328

,266
,943
,210
,918

511
,036
,495
,034

554
,994
,495
,991









.4

.8
.2

.9

.58
.84
.79
.57

.4
.02
.79
.46


-------
C.  Acid plant designed for maximum flow to acid plant — rounded
    to nearest 1,000 SCFM.
D.  Maximum S02 emissions from acid plant based on 2,600 ppm (0.26
    percent) for single contact acid plant and 650 ppm (0.065 per-
    cent for double contact acid plant.   Thus, maximum SOo emissions
    will be based on maximum volume to acid olant.
E.  SOo emissions from the FGD systems are based on a 90 percent
    efficiency for the system; thus, 10 percent of the sulfur pro-
    cessed in such systems will be released to the atmosphere.
F.  The uncontrolled S02 emissions represent fuqitive emissions
    based on, a sulfur balance for 1,400 TPD concentrate containing
    30 percent sulfur:

                             2 Ib SO?
         1,400 TPD x 0.3 S x	 = 840 TPD - SOo.
                              1 Ib S                e'
    Thus, for the two cases:
    Case 1:
    MHR:   43,000 SCFM at 5.0% S02 = 276.43 TPD - S02 = 32.91%
    RF:    54,000 SCFM at 1.0% S02 =  69.43 TPD - S02 =  8.26%
    Conv.: 82,000 SCFM at 4.5% S02 = 474.43 TPD - S02 = 56.48%
                                                        97.65%
    This implies 2.35% fugitive emissions = 19.7 TPD - S02-
    Case 2:
    FBR:   23,600 SCFM at 9.1% SOo = 276.12 TPD - SOo = 32.88%
    RF:    54,000 SCFM at 1.0% S00 =  69.43 TPD - S02 =  8.26%
    Conv.: 82,000 SCFM at 4.5% SOo = 474.43 TPD - SOo = 56.48%
                                                        97.62%
    This implies 2.38% fuqitive emissions = 20.0 TPD - S02.
    Additionally, for Case Nos. 17 and 18 the fugitive emissions
    are added to the uncontrolled reverberatory S02 emissions.
G.  The total S02 in TPD charged to the system is 840 TPD - S02.

                                 506

-------
                           APPENDIX Y-4
        SPECIFIC ASSUMPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL BLENDING SCENARIOS
                          (TABLE 6-6 IN TEXT)

     All assumptions considered for Table 5-4 are applicable here
with the additional assumption that:
     For Numbers 51-58, the strategy was to blend all offgas streams
and bleed a portion off to send to a FGD system.   The volume of the
bleed-off stream was determined by calculating the amount required
to achieve an 8.0 oercent SOo stream which could  be sent to the acid
plant.   The 8.0 percent S02 is usually the maximum that can be pro-
cessed  in an acid plant without adding dilution air; this strategy
results in a constant S02 concentrated stream of  reduced volume.
     The following equations  were used:
     For MgO = 10% S02 at X = 0.1X where X = concentrated S02 volume
                                             of FGD system

                                             Y =  volume of bleed
          Y (7\ j_9_ _ v                           stream to FGD
                • I
                                             F =  volume of initial
                                                 blended stream
          n ns - (F - Y) Z +  0.1  X
          u-uo ~    (F - Y) + X              Z =  percent S02 of initial
                                                 blended stream
     For Citrate:   95% S02 at X = 0.95 X     where X, Y, F, and Z are
                                                 the same as above.
          Y (Z)     = X
          n nfi - (F - Y)  (Z)  + .95 X
          u.uo -    (F -  Y)  + X

     These equations assume  that the volumes  off the FGD systems are
                                507

-------
constant (95 percent S02 for citrate  and  10  percent  3^2  for MgO) and
that a 90 percent efficiency is  realized.
                                508

-------
                  SULFURIC ACID PLANT COST ANALYSIS

Capital  Cost Analysis

     Detailed cost analyses were prepared for two different acid  plant
gas handling capacities.   The analyses were made for double contact/
double absorption (DC/DA) acid plants handling 85,000 and 50,000  scfm
of gas at 4.25 percent S0?.  From these costs, Figure 1 was generated
for DC/DA acid plants.

Annual Operating Costs

     Figure 2 indicates the annual  operating costs for DC/DA acid
plants.   When calculating operating costs for two acid plants,  i.e.,
when the feed volume is greater than about 110,000 scfm, annual
operating costs will not be double the value obtained from the  figure;
rather,  operating labor costs for the second plant must be subtracted
since it is considered that the same crew can operate two side-by-side
plants as one.
                                509

-------
   10C
I/I
o
•o
en
 i
•o
iS)
o
LU
O.

-------
   10C
0\
r^
cr>
 i
TJ
oo
O
O
0.
O
   10'
      9
     (20)
                   I
 14
(30)
          I
 19     24
(40)   (50)
                                                                4.25% S0
                              I
                                                                     S0

                                                                     S0

                                                                     S0
                                                             I	I
               I .
 47
(100)
 71
(150)
                      SMELTER GAS  FOLW RATE,  Nm 3/s (103 scfm)
         Figure 2.   Annual Operating Costs for Sulfuric Acid Plants —
                      Double Contact Acid Plants (DC/DA)
 94
(200)
                                     511

-------
                  REFERENCES TO APPENDICES
1.   Treilhard, D.6., "Copper Smelting Today:   The State of the
     Art," E/MJ, April  16,  1973,  Paqe P

2.   Reference 1, Page  Q

3.   EPA Public Comment Summary,  Primary Copper Zinc and Lead
     Smelters, Tab B

3A.  Weisenbera, I.J. and P.S.  Bakshi, "Process Parameters  for
     Primary Copper Smelters and  Their Effects  on Arsenic Emis-
     sions," PES, 1978, EPA Contract Mo. 68-02-2606, Task 8

4.   Hayward, C.R., An  Outline of Metallurgical Practice, Second
     Edition, D. Van Nostrand Comoany, Incorporated, New York,
     1940, Page 40

5.   Reference 4, Page  35

6.   Austin, L.S., "The Washoe Plant of the Anaconda Copper-Mining
     Company in 1905,"  Trans. AIME, Volume 37,  1942, Page 66

7.   Newton, J. and Wilson, C.L., "Metallurgy  of Copper," John
     Wiley and Sons, Incorporated, New York, 1942, Page 66

8.   Reference 6, Paqe  466

9.   Bray, J.L., "Nonferrous Production Metallurgy," Second Edition,
     John Wiley and Sons, Incoroorated, New York, 1947, Page 139

10.  Carpenter, B.H., "Nonferrous Smelter Studies: Theoretical
     Investigation of Role of Multihearth Roaster Operations in
     Copper Smelting Gas Blending Schemes for Control of S02,"
     Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 12, Number 1,
     January, 1978, Paqe 58

11.  Townend, R., et al., Amdel Bull. 2, Austral. Min. Dev. Lab.,
     1966

12.  Vlingterharger, H., et al., J. Ore Min. Nonferrous Metal 1.,
     27(5), 225-32, 1974

13.  "Chemical Engineering Handbook," 5th ed.,  pp. 4-9, McGraw-Hill,
     New York, New York

                             512

-------
                      REFERENCES (Continued)
14.  Reference 11, Page 60

15.  Reference 4, Page 46

16.  Reference 11, Page 60

17.  Reference 10, Page 143

18.  Reference 4, Page 47

19.  Weisenberg, I.'J'., and Seme, J.C.,  "Design and Operating
     Parameters for Emission Control  Studies:   Phelps  Dodge,
     Douglas, Copper Smelter,"  February,  1976,  EPA-600/2-76-036h

20.  Weisenberg, I.J., and Serne, J.C.,  "Design and Operating
     Parameters for Emission Control  Studies:   ASARCO,  Tacoma,
     Copper Smelter," February, 1976, EPA-600/2-76-036k

21.  Weisenberg, I.J., and Serne, J.C.,  "Compilation and  Analysis
     of Design and Operating Parameters  of the  ASARCO,  Incorporated,
     Hayden Plant, Hayden, Arizona,  for  Emission Control  Studies,"
     November, 1975, EPA Contract No. 68-02-1405, Task  Order  No. 5

22.  Matthews, J.C., et al., "SO? Control  Processes for Nonferrous
     Smelter," January, 1976, EPA-600/2-76-008

23.  Boggs, M.B., and Anderson, J.N., "The Noranda Smelter,"
     Trans. AIME, Volume 106, Page 189

24.  Reference 6

25.  Stankovic, D., "Air Pollution Caused  by Copper Metallurgy
     Assemblies in Bor:  Volume 11 -  Multilevel  Roasting:  Furnaces,"
     Project Study Rep. PL-480, Number 2-513-1,  Bor, Yugoslavia,
     August, 1975

26.  Oldright, et al., "Production of Ferric Sulfate and  H2S04
     from Roaster Gas," Trans.  AIME,  Volume 73,  Page 87

27.  Reference 1, Page S

28.  Reference 11, Pages 57-62

29.  Carpenter, B.H., et al., "Copper Smelter Emissions Control
     Study," EPA Contract No. 68-02-1325,  Task  Nos. 43  and 60

30.  Reference 6, Page 466

31.  Reference 6, Page 466

                             513

-------
                      REFERENCES (Continued)
32.  Reference 9
33.  Laist, F., AIME Transactions, Vol.  106,  History of Reverberatory
     Smelting in Montana

34.  Winkler, Mooney, Kuzell  and Mounts, -Patent #2,  124, 865
     July, 1938

35.  Merkle & Associates, Inc.  Engineers, Suspended  Refractory Designs

36.  Modern Refractory Practice, Harbison-Walker Refractories, 1961

37.  Jan Reimers and Associates

38.  Roserykranz, R.D., "Energy Consumption in Domestic Primary Cooper
     Production," Information Circular 8698,  U.S. Department of the
     Interior, 1976

39.  McKerrow, G.C., Gaspe Copper Mines  Smelter, AIME Annual Meeting,
     New Orleans, February 25-28, 1957

40.  Reference 39

41.  Staff, Canadian Mining Journal, International  Nickel  Co.  Issue,
     Volume 6, No. 6, pp. 431-435

42.  Staff, Canadian Mining Journal, Sudbury  Operations of Inco.
     May 1977, pp. 63-65

43.  Edlund, V.E., and S.J. Hussey, "Recovery of Copper from Converter
     Slags by Flotation," Report of Investigations  7562 (Revised);
     U.S. Department of the Interior

44.  Visit to Mitsubishi Metals Co., January  17 and  28, 1977

45.  Visit to Mitsubishi Metals Co., January  17 and  285 1977

46.  Itakura, K., Ikuda, H.,  Goto, M., "Double Exoansion of Onahama
     Smelter and Refinery," Paper Mo. A74-11, The Metallurgical
     Society of AIME, 1974

47.  Niimura, M., Konada, T., Kojima, R., "Control  of Emissions at
     Onahama Cooper Smelter," Joint meeting MMIJ -  AIME 1972,  Tokyo,
     Japan

48.  Visit to Naoshima Copper Smelter, January 25,  1977

49.  "Naoshima Copper Smelter and Refinery Complex," Guidebook, 1972
                              514

-------
                    REFERENCES (Continued)
50.  Ichida, Norimitsu, "Design and Construction of New Naoshima
     Refinery Using High Efficiency Reverberatory Furnace," Journal
     of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan, Vol. 87,
     No. 1001, 1971, pp. 509-14

51.  Visit to Naoshima Copper Smelter, January 25, 1977

52.  Carpenter, B.H., "Nonferrous Smelter Studies: Investigation of
     the Role of Multihearth Roaster Operations in Coooer Smelter Gas
     Blending Schemes for Control of SO?: Part III," RTI, EPA
     Contract No. 68-02-1325

53.  Schuhmann, R., "A Survey of the Thermodynamics of Copper
     Smelting," Journal of Metals. 188; pp. 873-884, 1950

54.  Ruddle, R.W., The Physical Chemistry of Copper Smelting,
     Institute of Mining Metallurgy, London (1953)

55.  Mynnykyj, J.R., "Thermodynamic Constraints on the Cerbothermic
     and Matte Smelting Process," Canadian Mining Metallurgy Bulletin

56.  Johansen, E.B., et al, "On the Thermodynamics of Continuous
     Copper Smelting," Journal  of Metals, pp.  39-47, September 1970

57.  Toguri, J.M., et al.,  "A Review of Recent Studies on Copper
     Smelting," Canadian Metallurgy Ouarterly, 3 (3); pp.  197-221,
     July-September, 1964

58.  Jeffes, J.H.E. and C.  Diaz, "Physical Chemistry of One-Step
     Copper Production From a Chalcopyrite Concentrate," Trans.
     Inst.  Win. Met., pp.  C1-C6, 1971

59.  Karakas, N., "Magnetite Formation During  Copper Matte
     Converting," Trans. Inst.  Min. and Met.,  1972, pp. 35-53, 1962

60.  Visit to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., January 19, 1977

61.  Visit to Hiroshima Technical Institute, January 24, 1977

62.  Korosy, L., et al., "Chemistry of S02 Absorption and Conversion
     to Sulfur by the Citrate Process," Paper  presented at the
     Symposium on Sulfur Removal and Recovery  From Industrial Sources,
     16th American Chemical  Society National Meeting, Los  Angeles,
     California, April 5,  1974

63.  "S02 Removal by a Sodium Citrate  Solution Scrubbing," Sweden
     Pacer prepared by Olar Erqa, Associated Professor in Chemical
     Engineering Norwegian  Institute of Technology, Norway
                              515

-------
                    REFERENCES (Continued)
64.   Pedroso, R.I., "An Update of the Wellman-Lord Flue Gas Desulfuri-
     zation Process," Pacer oresented at Symposium on Flue Gas Desul-
     furization, New Orleans, March 1976

65.   Potts, H.R., E.G. Lawford, "Recovery of Sulfur Gases by the Orkla
     Process at Rio Tinto."

66.   Bischoff, M.F., Foster Mheeler Eneray Corporation, Livingston,
     New Jersey, Private Communications.

67.   Bischoff, W.F., et al., "BF Dry Adsorotion System," Paper
     presented at the Symposium on Flue Gas Desulfurization, New
     Orleans, March 1976

68.   Steiner, P., and Juntgen, H., "Prpcess for Removal and Production
     of Sulfur Dioxides From Polluted Gas Streams," American Chemical
     Society

69.   Reference 67

70.   Reference 68

71.   Reference 66

72.   Reference 67

73.   Reference 33

74.   Rosenkranz, R.D., "Energy Consumption in Domestic Primary Copper
     Production," Information Circular 8698, U.S. Department of the
     Interior, 1976

75.   Westinform Shipping Report No. 310, Sulfur '85 May 1976,
     Published by the Mestinform Service, London

76.   Reference 75

77.   Sulfur in 1975, Mineral Industry Surveys, U.S. Department of the
     Interior, Burea of Mines

78.   Reference 75

79.   Reference 75

80.   Reference 75

81.   Personal communication with Mr. A. J. Kroha, of ASARCO
                               516

-------
                    REFERENCES (Continued)

82.  Mineral Facts and Problems, 1975 Edition, U.S. Department of the
     Interior, Bureau of Mines
83.  Reference 77
84.  Reference 77
85.  Reference 34
86.  Reference 33
87.  Reference 77
88.  Reference 77
89.  Reference 77
90.  Merkle & Associates, Inc. Engineers, Suspended Refractory Designs
91.  Reference 90
92.  McGlamery, G.6., et al., Detailed Cost Estimates for Advanced
     Effluent Desulfurization Processes, EPA publication 600/2-75-006
     (TVA Bulletin Y-90), January 1975
93.  Bucy, J.I., et al., "Potential Utilization of Controlled SOX
     Emissions From Power Plants in Eastern United States," Proceed-
     ings: Symposium on Flue Gas Desulfurization, New Orleans, March
     1976, Vol. II.
94.  Shreve, R.N., Chemical  Process Industries, McGraw Hill, 1967
95.  Reference 77
96.  Reference 77
97.  Reference 90
98.  Reference 90
99.  Reference 90
100. Reference 90
101. Reference 36
102. Reference 64
103. Reference 66
                               517

-------
                    REFERENCES  (Continued)

104.  Reference 75
105.  Reference 75
106.  Savage,  P.R.,  Sulfur:  1980s  Shortage or  Glut,  Chemical  Engineer-
     ing.  September 27,  1976
107.  Riegel,  Emil Raymond,  Riegel's  Handbook  of  Industrial  Chemistry
     (Seventh edition)  (ed. James A.  Kent). Van  Nostrand  Reinhold  Co.,
     New York, New York  1974
108.  Reference 107
109.  Reference 106
110.  Reference 106
111.  Reference 106
112.  Reference 106
113.  Reference 106
114.  Reference 106
115.  Reference 106
116.  Reference 106
117.  Reference 106
118.  Reference 106
119.  Reference 106
120.  Reference 106
121.  Reference 75
122.  Reference 82
123.  Reference 82
124.  Reference 82
125.  Reference 36
126.  Reference 82
                              518

-------
                    REFERENCES (Continued)
127. Reference 82
128. Reference 82
129. Reference 75
130. Reference 35
131. Reference 77
132. Tim Browder
                               519

-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/2-80-152
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Feasibility of Primary Copper Smelter Weak
Dioxide Stream Control
7. AUTHOR(S)
I.J. Weisenberg, T. Archer
A. Prem
Sulfur
, P.M. Winkler, T.J. Browder
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
1930 14th St.
Santa Monica, California 90404
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Project Officer: John 0.

3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
July 1980 Issuing Date
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
IAB604
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
EPA Contract No. 68-03-2398
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/ 600/12
Burckle, Nonferrous Metals ft Minerals Branch
16. ABSTRACT
The major source of uncontrolled emissions of S02 from primary copper smelters in
the U.S. is the reverberatory furnace because gas strength is too low for direct pro-
cessing in a sulfuric acid plant, the accepted control approach in this industry. Sys-
tems and techniques that experience indicates, either singly or in combination, can be
used to control weak S02 emissions from copper smelters are identified, analyzed and
discussed.
Two overall approaches to weak S02 stream control are (1) increasing the concen-
tration of S02 to a range where it is feasible to produce sulfuric acid or other use-
able byproducts or (2) neutralizing the effluent as a waste product. Process modifi-
cations to minimize the use of air such as in-leakage control and oxygen enrichment can
significantly increase S02 concentration. The use of add on systems to concentrate the
weak S02 such as the magnesium oxide, ammonia and citrate systems have demonstrated
applicability. The lime or limestone neutralization process where forced oxidation
is used to produce gypsum has been demonstrated as an approach to producing a "throw
away" product. Coal reduction to sulfur also shows sufficient promise for serious
consideration. Product markets are discussed.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
Exhaust Emissions
Smelting
Pollution
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI I leld/Group
Sulfur Dioxide Control 13B
Primary Copper Smelting
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report) 21. NO. OF PAGES
Unclassified 540
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page) 22. PRICE
Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)    PREVIOUS  EDITION is OBSOLETE
                                                                                           U.3. GOVERliMKNT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980—6^7-1 ft/0090
                                                            520

-------