650R80009A     I States        Municipal Environmental Research   September 1980
             nmental Protection    Laboratory
             ;y          Cincinnati OH 45268
           RBMBroh and Development	

           International Seminar on

           Control of Nutrients in

           Municipal Wastewater

           Effluents
           Proceedings
           Volume I: Phosphorus
           Hotel del Coronado
           (San Diego)Coronado, California 92118
           September 9, 10, and 11, 1980

-------
             CONTROL  OF  NUTRIENTS

      IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER EFFLUENTS


            VOLUME I:  PHOSPHORUS

   Proceedings of an International Seminar
            San Diego, California
             September  9-11,  1980
              Seminar Convener:

                 E. F. Barth
         Wastewater Research Division
 Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
                  Speakers:

          Dr. N. W. Schmidtke, Burlington, Canada
          Dr. J. V. DePinto, Potsdam, New York
          Mr. W. L. Morley, Gladstone, Michigan
          Dr. B. G. Hultman, Stockholm, Sweden
          Mr. T. Annaka, Tokyo, Japan
          Mrs. D. VanDam, Grand Haven, Michigan
          Mr. C. Heim, Tonawanda, New York
 Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory

                     and

Center for Environmental Research Information
      Office  of  Research  and  Development
     U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
           Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268

-------
                                    AGENDA FOR
                               INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR
                                        ON
                   CONTROL OF NUTRIENTS IN WASTEWATER  EFFLUENTS
                                 SEPTEMBER 8,  1980

7:30 to 9:00 p.m.       RECEPTION/EARLY REGISTRATION

                       VOLUME I                                              Page

SEPTEMBER 9, 1980      PHOSPHORUS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

7:30 to 9:00 a.m.       REGISTRATION

9:00 to 9:15           WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM

                                Mr. Edwin Barth
                                Chief,  Biological  Treatment  Section
                                Wastewater Treatment  Division
                                U.S.  EPA/MERL

9:15 to 10:05          NUTRIENT REMOVAL TECHNOLOGY -  THE CANADIAN                1
                       CONNECTION
                       A presentation of the rationale  for nutrient
                       control; the development of an R&D, legislative,
                       and technology transfer program; implementation
                       of low cost technology  at existing municipal
                       plants; and impact and  current status of control
                       technology.

                       Speaker:  Dr.  Norbert W. Schmidtke, Director
                                 Wastewater Technology  Centre
                                 Environmental  Protection Service
                                 Environment Canada
                                 Burlington, Ontario, Canada

10:05 to 10:20         COFFEE BREAK

10:20 to 11:10         PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN LOWER GREAT. LAKES MUNICIPAL        39
                       TREATMENT PLANTS
                       A survey of phosphorus  removal processes of
                       various types, with statistical  summary of lower
                       lakes facilities, histograms of  performance and
                       loadings, and a  discussion  on  phosphorus
                       availability in relation to treatment processes.

                       Speaker:  Dr.  Joseph DePinto
                                 Department of Civil  and Environmental
                                   Engi neeri ng
                                 Clarkson College, Potsdam,  New York
                                       m

-------
                       VOLUME  I  (Continued)                                   Page

11:10 to 12:00         EXPERIENCES AT GLADSTONE,  MICHIGAN  UTILIZING            91
                       ROTATING  BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS FOR  BOD,
                       PHOSPHORUS AND AMMONIA  CONTROL
                       A rotating biological contactor  facility with
                       summary data on effluent residuals,  key daily
                       operational  points, actual  cost  data, and
                       recommendations on future facility  design  from an
                       operational  standpoint.

                       Speaker:   Mr.  Willard Lee Morley, Superintendent
                                 Water and Wastewater Treatment
                                 City of Gladstone,  Michigan

12:00 to 1:00          LUNCH

1:00 to 1:50           CONTROL TECHNOLOGY FOR  NUTRIENTS IN MUNICIPAL           113
                       WASTEWATER TREATMENT  IN SWEDEN
                       Necessity for nutrient  control in Sweden,
                       techniques to translate basic nutrient  research
                       into full-scale facilities, and  extent  of
                       implementation of nutrient control  in municipal
                       facilities in Sweden.

                       Speaker:   Dr.  Bengt Gunnar Hultman
                                 Swedish Water and Wastewater
                                   Works Association
                                 Stockholm,  Sweden

1:50 to 2:40           RESEARCH ON PHOSPHORUS CONTROL  IN JAPAN             (separate
                       The type of research  on phosphorus  control  being     manuscript)
                       conducted in Japan, the reasons  why phosphorus
                       control is necessary, and views  of  operating
                       facilities that utilize phosphorus  removal
                       processes.

                       Speaker:   Mr. T. Annaka
                                  Department of Sewage  and Serage
                                    Purification
                                  Ministry of Construction
                                  Japan

2:40 to 3:30           ECONOMICAL AND EFFICIENT PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL AT  A       139
                       DOMESTIC-INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PLANT
                       The combination of industrial and domestic waste
                       characteristics considered in the design of the
                       facility, a summary of several years of plant
                       efficiency, and the low-cost experience of
                       phosphorus control.

                       Speaker:  Mrs. Doris Van Dam, Superintendent
                                 Wastewater Treatment Plant
                                 Grand Haven,  Michigan
                                          iv

-------
                       VOLUME I  (Continued)                                   Page

3:30 to 3:45           COFFEE BREAK

3:45 to 4:35           THE PHOSTRIP PROCESS  FOR PHOSPHORUS  REMOVAL            159
                       The PhoStrip process  is  discussed with emphasis
                       on efficiency,  cost,  and reliability in  relation
                       to original  design approaches.

                       Speaker:   Mr.  Carl  J.  Heim
                                 Assistant Staff Engineer
                                 Union Carbide  Corporation
                                 Linde Division
                                 Tonawanda,  New York

4:35 to 5:00           DISCUSSION ON  PHOSPHORUS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

-------
                       VOLUME II                                              Page

SEPTEMBER 10,  1980     NITROGEN CONTROL  TECHNOLOGY


8:00 to 8:50           EMERGING STRATEGY FOR  NITROGEN  CONTROL BASED ON         1
                       RECEIVING WATER QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS
                       Emerging nitrogen strategies  and  the  need  for
                       nitrification will be  discussed,  along with
                       research needs for nitrification  to suit European
                       situations.

                       Speaker:  Dr. Willi  Gujer
                                 Swiss Federal Institute for Water
                                   Pollution  Control
                                 Dubendorf, Switzerland

8:50 to 9:40           FULL-SCALE CARBON OXIDATION/NITRIFICATION  STUDIES       43
                       AT THE METROPOLITAN SANITARY  DISTRICT OF GREATER
                       CHICAGO
                       Large-scale plant manipulations to accomplish
                       single-stage nitrification, with  operational
                       control techniques related to nitrification
                       kinetics and to implications  of control and  costs
                       for a 1,300 MGD facility.

                       Speaker:  Dr. Cecil  Lue-Hing, Laboratory Director
                                 Metropolitan Sanitary District of
                                   Greater Chicago
                                 Chicago, Illinois

9:40 to 10:30          PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH IRON  SALTS AT BLUE PLAINS        98
                       Data from the world's largest nutrient  control
                       plant on mineral  addition for phosphorus control.
                       Discussion of costs, alternate chemical
                       selection, and sludge production, plus  what  it
                       takes to put a plant of this  size on-line.

                       Speaker:  Mr. Ed Jones, Chief Process Engineer
                                 Wastewater Treatment Plant
                                 Washington, D.C.

10:30 to 10:45         COFFEE  BREAK

10:45 to 11:45         NITRIFICATION AT  LIMA, OHIO                            129
                       Design  of second-stage plastic media for
                       nitrification, summarizing several years of
                       efficiency data,  operational  control, and  costs,
                       and relating these to  design changes of second
                       generation designs.

                       Speaker:  Mr. Felix Sampayo
                                 Jones  and Henry Engineers, Ltd.
                                 Toledo, Ohio

-------
                       VOLUME II (Continued)                                   Page

11:45 to 1:30          LUNCH
                       Speaker:   Dr.  Henry Heimlich,  Professor  of
                                   Advanced Clinical  Studies
                                 Xavier University
                                 Cincinnati,  Ohio
                                 Author of the Heimlich  Maneuver

1:30 to 2:20           OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH  A  30 MGD  TWO-STAGE            153
                       BIOLOGICAL NITRIFICATION PLANT
                       A summary of efficiency data,  control-loops,
                       operational  modifications, and costs for the John
                       Eagan Plant.

                       Speaker:   Mr.  Earl  W.  Knight
                                 Assistant Chief  Engineer
                                 Metropolitan Sanitary District
                                   of Greater Chicago
                                 Chicago,  Illinois

2:20 to 3:10           NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION  IN  FULL-SCALE             170
                       TREATMENT PLANTS IN AUSTRIA
                       Single stage nitrification/denitrification, plus
                       status of nitrification control in  Austria and
                       the need  for this technology.

                       Speaker:   Dr.  Norbert  F. Matsche
                                 Assistant Professor
                                 Technical University, Vienna,  Austria

3:10 to 3:25           COFFEE BREAK

3:25 to 4:15           SINGLE STAGE NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION AT           194
                       OWEGO, NEW YORK
                       Second generation design for single-stage
                       nitrification/denitrification  systems,  and a
                       real-world perspective on  reliability,  efficiency
                       demands,  cost, and operation.

                       Speaker:   Mr.  Donald E. Schwinn,  P.E.
                                 Stearns and  Wheler
                                 Civil  and Sanitary Engineers
                                 Cazenovia, New York

4:15 to 5:00           DISCUSSION ON  NITROGEN CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
                                           vii

-------
                       VOLUME III                                             Page


SEPTEMBER 11, 1980     COMBINED PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN CONTROL
                       TECHNOLOGY

8:15 to 9:05           DESIGN AND OPERATION OF NITROGEN CONTROL                 1
                       FACILITIES AT TAMPA AND THE NSSD
                       Three-step nitrogen control at Tampa and two-step
                       nitrogen control  at the North Shore Sanitary
                       District in Illinois.  A summary of the design,
                       operation, and use of the unusual flexibility
                       buillt into these plants.

                       Speaker:  Mr. Thomas E. Wilson
                                 Principal Engineer
                                 Greely and Hansen
                                 Chicago, Illinois

9:05 to 9:55           PERFORMANCE OF FIRST U.S. FULL-SCALE BARDENPHO          34
                       FACILITY
                       A managed biological system for nitrogen and
                       phosphorus control.
                       Speaker:  Dr. H. David Stensel, Manager
                                 Sanitary Engineering Technoloc
                                   Rf\tj/\1 r\v\mf\n+  ET TM^H DMH
                                   Development, EIMCO PMD
                                 Salt Lake City, Utah

9:55 to 10:10          COFFEE BREAK

10:10 to 11:00         DENITRIFICATION IN CONTINUOUS-FLOW SEQUENTIALLY         74
                       AERATED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEMS AND BATCH
                       PROCESSES
                       Present developments on batch systems controlled
                       by time-clocked valves and evolution into a
                       microprocessor-controlled municipal facility.

                       Speakers:  Dr. Mervyn C. Goronszy
                                  Senior Investigating Engineer
                                  State Pollution Control Commission
                                  Sidney, Australia

                                               and

                                  Dr. Robert L. Irvine, P.E.
                                  Deptartment of Civil Engineering
                                  University of Notre Dame
                                  Notre Dame, Indiana
                                           viii

-------
                       VOLUME  III  (Continued)                                 Page


11:00 to 12:00         NITROGEN  AND  PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION FROM LAND            118
                       APPLICATIONS  AT THE DISNEY WORLD RESORT COMPLEX
                       Several approaches to attaining defined effluent
                       residuals and accumulating large amounts of
                       analytical  data for this entertainment complex,
                       with data on  phosphorus control in the activated
                       sludge  system, overland flow, spray, and
                       perculation basins.

                       Speaker:  Mr. Robert Kohl, Director
                                Reedy Creek Utilities Company, Inc.
                                Walt Disney World
                                Lake Buena Vista, Florida

12:00 to 1:00          LUNCH

1:00 to 1:50           EXPERIENCE  WITH AMMONIA REMOVAL BY SELECTIVE  ION       137
                       EXCHANGE  AND  CLOSED-CYCLE AIR STRIPPING
                       REGENERANT  RENEWAL
                       A discussion  of the Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation
                       Agency  and  the Upper Occoquan facility in
                       Virginia, covering a closed-cycle stripping
                       process in  relation to efficiency and effluent
                       residuals,  operational considerations, and cost
                       data.

                       Speaker:  Mr. L.  Gene Shur
                                Vice President and Director
                                CH2M-Hill Consultants
                                Corvallis, Oregon

1:50 to 2:40           NITRIFICATION AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL  IN A 35 MGD       185
                       ADVANCED  WASTE TREATMENT PLANT AT ROANOKE, VA
                       Design  parameters related to operational results
                       for control of nitrification and phosphorus
                       residuals.

                       Speaker:  Mr. Donald E. Eckmann
                                Alyord, Burdick, and Howson Engineers
                                Chicago,  Illinois
                                           and
                                Mr. Harold S. Zimmerman, Plant Manager
                                Waste Treatment Plant
                                Roanoke, Virginia

2:40 to 3:30           FULL-SCALE  EXPERIENCE WITH TWO-STAGE                   214
                       NITRIFICATION AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL
                       Accumulated efficiency and cost  data  from two
                       facilities, a summary of efficiency  data, as
                       frequency distribution, overall  costs, and
                       operational modifications necessary  for enhanced
                       second generation design.

                       Speaker:   Mr. Winfield A. Peterson,  Chief
                                 Plant Operating Group  N.E.
                                 Metcalf and Eddy,  Inc.
                                 Boston, Massachusetts

                                        ix

-------
       NUTRIENT REMOVAL TECHNOLOGY - THE CANADIAN CONNECTION

                   N.W. Schmidtke, Ph.D., P. Eng.
              Director, Wastewater Technology Centre
        Environmental Protection Service, Environment Canada
INTRODUCTION

Man-initiated acceleration of eutrophication of large and small

bodies of water has received attention from the public because of

dramatic and rapid, visible changes in water quality.  This not

only results in undesirable changes in water use patterns such as

restricted use of pleasure craft, swimming, fishing, but also

more subtle effects such as clogging of water intakes, increased

turbidity, taste and odor problems and general interferences with

water treatment processes.  These effects are caused by algae blooms

which in most instances are a manifestation of a biological re-

sponse to excessive nutrient input to the water column.

Even though Canada has 1/3 of the world's fresh water, deteriora-

tion in water quality such as previously noted exists.  More speci-

fically 4 major areas (Figure 1) where significant evidence of

water quality impairment has  been identified are:

    1.  The Okanagan Basin - British Columbia

    2.  The Qu'Appelle River Basin - Saskatchewan

    3.  The Saint John River Basin - New Brunswick

    4.  The Great Lakes Basin - Ontario

Phosphorus has been implicated as a limiting or key nutrient in

the eutrophication of many natural or man-made bodies of water

throughout the industrialized world (1).

-------
                                                        ATLANTIC
                                                         OCEAN
                                                        0     600km
 FIGURE 1,  MAJOR AREAS OF WATER QUALITY CONCERN ,
Detergents, human waste, agricultural  run-off,  atmospheric
transport and industrial activities  are  all major sources of
phosphorus being discharged to  receiving bodies of water.  An
additional phosphorus reservoir exists in the bottom sediments
of lakes and rivers.

An obvious solution to  the problem consists of reducing the input
of phosphorus to the environment.  This  is a relatively simple
problem if dealing with point sources.   One of the main point
sources of phosphorus is the effluent  from municipal waste treat-

-------
ment plants.  Removal of phosphorus contained in domestic and
industrial wastewaters is recognized as an essential step in
decelerating and eventually reversing the extent of eutrophication
in receiving waters.
The water management studies (2) conducted in the Okanagan Basin,
the Qu'Appelle River Basin and the Saint John River Basin all con-
firm that reduction in nutrient  inputs, especially phosphorus,
will result in a decrease in the rate of water quality deteriora-
tion and will ultimately lead to improvement of existing water
quality.  In these three areas,activities related to the construc-
tion of new treatment plants and installation of phosphorus removal
facilities are in progress.
This paper will provide an overview of the numerous activities
undertaken by the Canadian government and the Province of Ontario
in a concerted effort to control nutrient inputs (phosphorus) to
the Great Lakes.
A POINT SOURCE PHOSPHORUS CONTROL STRATEGY
The International Joint Commission (IJC) Report (3) completed in
1969 after a six year study of pollution in the Lower Great Lakes
drainage basin, recommended that all phosphorus discharges to the
Lower Great Lakes be reduced to the lowest practical level, call-
ing for an effluent objective of 1.0 mg.L-1 total phosphorus.
To meet this challenge, Canada opted for a double-pronged attack on
eutrophication, relying on legislative as well as technical means
to reduce phosphorus concentrations in wastewater discharges.

-------
Thus, the Canadian Government, under the provisions of the Canada



Water Act (1970), legislated a policy calling for a staged reduc-



tion in the phosphorus content of detergents to a limit - by



weight as P205 - of 20% by August 1970 and 5% by December 31, 1972.



Establishment and support of the framework for developing the



technical means to reduce the nutrient content of municipal waste-



water discharges to the Great Lakes system was recognized to be



a joint Federal-Provincial responsibility.




A FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL ACCORD



As a prelude to the Canada-United States Agreement which was signed



between the United States and Canada in 1972, the Governments of



Canada and Ontario signed an Agreement (4) in August 1971, to im-



plement and accelerate programs of pollution control in the Lower



Great Lakes to meet the recommendations of the IJC.  The Agreement



secured funding for a $250 million capital works program aimed at



upgrading sewage collection systems and treatment works.  This



included the installation of phosphorus removal equipment at an



estimated cost of $40 million.   An additional $6 million over the



5 year term of the Agreement was provided for related research



studies.  Phosphorus removal technology and treatability studies



were given top priority in the research program.




The $6 million research fund was jointly shared and administered



by the Governments of Canada and Ontario.  The Agreement was sub-



sequently extended for an additional 2 year period with a further



$1 million allocation of research funding.




Largely as a result of this research funding, a program of integrat-

-------
ing  chemical treatment with existing  plant processes was

designed.   This  program  consisted of  jar testing followed by

treatability studies at  each plant.   The success of this strategy

is evident in that the deadlines for  implementation of  phosphorus

removal  at existing plants  as established by  Ontario in 1970 were

largely  met.  Figure 2 illustrates  the Ontario  phosphorus removal

program  with scheduled compliance dates.
                                                LEGEND

                                           D*c.31,1973 E33 All plants
                                           Dec. 31.1973
                                           Dtc.31,1975
                                           Future
Plants larger than
imgd or where
local problems
demonstrated

Plants larger
than 1 m.g d

n Studies required
to determine need.
            FIGURE 2.   PROVINCE OF ONTARIO-SOUTHERN SECTION
                       PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROGRAM SCHEDULED
                       COMPLIANCE DATES,   (8)
Even  though the  emphasis of phosphorus removal  has been  placed on

point-source reduction at  municipal  treatment plants, other sources

are not ignored.  Specifically:
      7.  Ontaru.o poticy c^oJULt, £01 an e^^ueftt objective, faon 4.nduAt/UaJt
                              o{> 1 mg.L'1  maxAmjum totaJt pkoApho>uuA .

-------
      2.  Unban Vsicu.n(ige. Sab- Committee o£ the. Canada-Ontafilo Agiee-
         me.nt In the^Ui P>iopoAe.d Model VoLicleA to* (Ifiban  VtLalnage.
         Mayia.3eme.nt (5) &uggeAtt> that "each mu.n4.CA.patcty  bhoJUL fionmu-
         late, and lmp£ejrne.nt a comptLe-he.n&lve. pollution cjonttioi
         &tsiate.gy n.eJtate.d to JUU* own patxttcuia/i Land ai£, d/Lolnage.
         and tuw-o  chasiac&.siL&ticA."
      3.  The. Piov4.nce. ka& ie.c.e.nt£y adopted sewage &tudg  (6) which lnc.tu.de. prLOviA AummaAy tuipont to thz IJC (7) ie.c.orme.nd!> that
         phoi>pho>wA  fizduLC-tion through non-point at> weLt at> point
         •iouice cont/w£ pnoQtumt>  be. Imptmznt2.d .  Jhl& MO aid IncJLude.
         contnoH oft  bolt ejwblon, &tne.nQthe.nlnQ o<5 the. aJie.at> o&
         fLe.du.CA.ng wate.fi pottutA,on pnobtewb fiX-om anlmai. 
-------
        £
        g
        o
        £
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
                               STEP 1 (AUG. 1970)
                                •20Z CRITERIA
                67   68  69   70  71   72  73  74   75  76   77
                                   YEAR
        FIGURE 3,   PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS IN RAW SEWAGE, (U)

The impact of legislated  phosphorus detergent reductions was best
illustrated in a ten-month long  full-scale study of the activated
sludge plant at the  Canadian Forces Base in Uplands (10).

Figures 4 and 5 highlight these  effects.  Figure 4 illustrates  the
average diurnal variations of influent phosphorus for the  1972-
1973 period, before  and after reformulation.  Each data point in
Figure 4 is the mean of hourly samples collected on at least
seven different days.
Figure 5 shows the average weekly data for total phosphorus and
plant flow and clearly indicates that the reduction in total phos-
phorus concentration was  not due to dilution by increased  flows.

The data show that influent phosphorus loadings dropped from an
average of 126 kg.d~* in  1972 to an average of 55 kg.d"1 in 1973;
a 56% reduction.

-------
 14-1
   1wn 4
FIGURE  4,
                                12pm
             DIURNAL VARIATION OF TOTAL
             PHOSPHORUS IN RAW WASTE-
             WATER AT C , F ,B ,  UPLANDS ,   (10)
  04-
           KWAOE  HMT  IFLUENT FLOW
           TOTAL PHOCnCNUS OONCBITNATON
I
       tff OCT HOV fiCCIJIN Ft* MAM If* MAY JUN JU. AUO KP
               •nl«T3
                    MONTH



FIGURE 5.   INFLUENT TOTAL PHOSPHORUS AND

             FLOW TRENDS DURING DEMONSTRATION

             STUDY AT C.F.B, UPLANDS,   (10)

-------
In another study  (12)  available Ontario phosphorus influent data

were summarized over  the  bre-ban and post-ban periods.  The data,

based on approximately 35 plants,  showed that the influent total

phosphorus concentration  had decreased from approximatly 7.1 mg.L"1

to 5.7 mg.L"1.  This  represents a 20% reduction in wastewater phos-

phorus loading directly attributable to laundry detergent reformu-

lation (Table 1) .


           TABLE 1,  IMPACT OF DETERGENT REFORMULATION ON WASTE-
                    WATER  PHOSPHORUS LEVELS (]2>




Raw wastewater
total phosphorus

-------
                        DOSE - -3.2 + 2.5 (P)
                U)
                EC
24-i
22-
20-
18-
16-
14-
12-
10-
6-
6-
4-
2-
                                       RAW SEWAGE
                                       SECONDARY
                                       EFFLUENT
                                               —i
                                               12
  0    2    4    6    8    10
 INITIAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION (mg/|)
              FIGURE 6,   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ALUM DOSE
                         REQ'D FOR IMG/A RESIDUAL P AND
                         INITIAL PHOSPHORUS,
Jar test data  for coagulant dosage  selection at Ontario treatment
plants as summarized in Table 2 show  dramatic reductions in
coagulant dosage  requirements between pre- and post- detergent
legislation dates.   By correcting the jar test dosages to  full
scale dosage requirements using the relationship developed in
another investigation (13), it can  be calculated that the  reductions
in chemical dosage  requirements to  achieve a 1 mg.L"1 total  phos-
phorus effluent are 7.6 ing.IT1 as Fe3+ and 5.1 mg.L"1 as A13+
respectively.
Using chemical costs (1980) of $0.558 kg"1 for FeCl3 and $0.134
kg"1 for alum  it  can be calculated  that the saving in chemical cost
                                 10

-------
            TABLE 2.   AVERAGE JAR TEST DOSAGES OF ALUM OR FERRIC
                      CHLORIDE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE A 1 MG.L'1
                      TOTAL PHOSPHORUS RESIDUAL PRIOR TO 1973 Q2)

                      R»w Wastewatei Addition       Mixed Liquor Addition

                                  Reduction              Reduction
            Chemical  Pre-1979  1973-Present   (%)   r.t-1973 1973-Piesent  (%)
Ferric
chloride
(mg/1) as
_ 3-K
Fe )
Alum
(mg/1 as
A1S+
30.5

(na=37)

19.4
(n=38)

17.2

(n - 36) '

13.1
(n = 36)

44 21 J 12.8

(n = 31) (n=26)

32 12.8 6.9
(n = 31) (n = 27)

41



46


            *n » number of observations.


alone  amounts to $2.96 capita^yr"1 for FeCl3  and $1.82 capita^yr"1

for  alum.   In addition, available data permits  one to calculate  that

if the  laundry detergents had not been reformulated, sludge volumes

would  be  approximatly 26% greater.


IMPLEMENTATION OF LOW COST TECHNOLOGY AT EXISTING PLANTS

A major component of the research program under  the Canada-Ontario

Agreement  addressed the subject of treatability  studies as a pre-

lude to installing full-scale phosphorus removal facilities.


Ontario's  successful experience in implementing  the phosphorus

removal program was to a large measure due to  the two-phase approach

used:  initial jar testing studies followed by  fairly long term  full-

scale  studies.   The data base thus developed and correlations

obtained between jar test and full-scale data  coupled with experience

have given us sufficient confidence so that full-scale studies  no

longer  need be  conducted.  At the initiation of  the program the two-
                                   11

-------
phase approach gave us not only  information on chemical and

dosage selection but optimum point of chemical application and

compatibility with the existing  wastetreatment process type and

operation.


Figure 7  is  a summary of the Ontario treatability  data when com

paring jar test to full scale performance data.  As shown, the
              30

              28

              26-

              24-
fc

8 «


I""
3 12-
310
              4-

              2-

              0
       OFe3*
                                        Full Scale
                                             •1.15
               024  6810121416182022242628
                       Full Scale Dotage (mg/l as Al~or Fc4")

            FIGURE 7,  COMPARISON OF JAR  TEST DOSAGES (FOR 1
                       p  50% OF THE TIME) TO FULL SCALE DOSAGES
                       (FOR 1 MGA P AVERAGE) AT PLANTS ADDING
                       ALUM OR FERRIC CHLORIDE TO THE MIXED LIQUOR,  (]2)

jar tests tended to overestimate  the  full-scale dosage require-

ments by  about 15%.  In one  study (12)  the  Ontario treatability

data was  standardized and regression  analyses  were carried out to

develop predictive equations for  chemical phosphorus  removal.

The equations so developed were capable of  predicting chemical
                                  12

-------
dosages  for a particular wastewater to -30%.  The implication of

this  is  that in future treatability programs the scope of  the jar

testing  phase can be reduced.   Some consultants have already used

this  approach successfully  (14).   An attempt was also made (15)  to

refine the  predictive capability  of the equations by including

parameters  additional to influent phosphorus concentrations,  such

as hardness, alkalinity, conductivity,  etc.   Even though the re-

sultant  equations now allowed one  to predict chemical dosage

requirements to within ±20% as  opposed to the earlier ±30%,  it was

concluded,  that based on this marginal degree of improvement,  the

extra time  and expense required cannot be justified.

Jar test and full-scale treatability cost data are summarized

in Tables 3  and 4 respectively  (11).   The cost is not only a


          TABLE 3,   JAR TESTING TREATABILITY COSTS (11)
                                   Average Cort ($) 1974
            Type of Facility        Plant Staff         Outside Contractor

               Primary            964               5020
              Secondary            817               5877
               Lagoons            588
function of  the  type of waste treatment  facility but more impor-

tantly whether the  study was contracted  out  or conducted by the

plant operations staff.  Chemical costs  are  excluded.  The wide


           TABLE  1,   FULL-SCALE TEMPORARY STUDY COSTS (11)
Type of Facility
Primary
Secondary
Lagoons
Maximum
(2,000
83,000
8,000
Cost(S) 1974
Minimum Average
7.000 19,100
1,000 13,100
800 4,100
                                 13

-------
 variations shown in bhe full-scale treatability costs reflect

 whether chemical feed  equipment had to be  purchased or whether  it

 was available on loan  from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment,

 The numerous phosphorus removal studies conducted at Ontario

 treatment plants have  resulted in the development of a massive

 data base.  Figure  8 is another example showing correlations for

 the molar effectiveness of FeCl3 or alum on  the removal of

 soluble phosphorus.  As shown, the molar effectiveness is similar
                 o.e
                 O.T-
                 o.e-
                 0.6
                 0.4
                , 0.3-
                 0.2-
                 01-
                                 (Uptanch)
                                         AERATION
                              ALUM
                              (Uptands)
                                        M'FEOR ALUM
                          MOLE
                              8466
                                MOLES M ADDED
                              MTML TO'
                                  UAL SOLUBLE PHOSPHORUS
             FIGURE 8,   COMPARISON OF THE MOLAR EFFECTIVENESS
                       OF FE CL3 AND ALUM AT C.F.B,  UPLANDS,  (10)

for each  chemical and agrees with the relationship reported by

others  (16)  for alum addition  to the secondary clarifier.   What

this means,  is  that if both chemicals were compared under  identi'

cal total  soluble phosphorus conditions,  their performance on a

molar basis  would be similar.
                                  14

-------
 CLARIFIER HYDRAULIC LOADING

 Hydraulic overloading of  secondary clarifiers is one cause  of

 poor effluent total phosphorus  quality which is associated  with

 suspended solids carryover.   Data  from the one study  (10) illus-

 trates the effluent total phosphorus/suspended solids dependence

 (Figure 9).   The effect of plant flow and thus overflow rate
               O PHASE 7
               O PHASE 8
         ?
           3-
           2-
           1 -
              0%0
                        I    I
                   20
40       60       80
 SUSPENDED SOLIDS (mg/l)
                                                   100
                                                           120
            FIGURE 9,   CORRELATION BETWEEN EFFLUENT TOTAL-P AND
                       SUSPENDED SOLIDS,  (10)


 (OR) of the secondary clarifier on total phosphorus removal is

 illustrated in  Figure 10 which shows data during  the alum addition

phases of a long term study.  A trend line has been drawn using

 the average total phosphorus removals and flow rates for the

various addition phases.  The trend line shows that phosphorus re-

movals in excess of 80%  were obtained when plant  flows  were at or

below the design flow or OR of less than 1.4 rah"1.   There was a
                                 15

-------
 SECONDARY CLARIFIER SOR (mh
12     14      16     IB
                                                 20
                eo-
                60-
                40-
                20
                     Trend toe
                      Range of values
                                 O Experimental etudy
                                 o Results obtained after study period
                                                          I
                                                        to
                                                          i
                                                        2.0
                                                        3.0
                    20        25        3JO

                           KANT FLOW tUXXft m3d-1)
                         3.5
           FIGURE 10,   EFFECT OF PLANT FLOW AND SOR ON TOTAL  PHOSPHORUS
                      REMOVAL DURING ALUM ADDITION.  (10)
decided  increase in the  variability of  the effluent  phosphorus

concentration above the  design flow.


Figure 11  also illustrates the effect of hydraulic load on second-

ary clarifier performance (17).  Once the hydraulic  load increased

beyond 1.5 mh"1 effluent quality steadily deteriorated.  In all

cases chemicals were added to the aeration tank discharge.


Experience has shown that phosphorus removal efficiency is very

closely  related to solids removal efficiency.  No matter how much

chemical is added, unless the suspended solids level can be
                                  16

-------
         50-
        o> 40-
        E
       CO „
       co 30-
       H-
       uj 20-

       u.
       u. 10-
       UJ '"n
—i	1	1	r~
 0.8      1.2      1.6      2.0
      HYDRAULIC LOAD (mh~1)
                                                  2.4
       FIGURE 11,   EFFECT OF HYDRAULIC LOAD OF SECONDARY CLARIFIER
                  CHEMICAL ADDITION TO AERATION SECTION,  (17)

reduced to less than 15 mg.L"1,  it will be impossible  to  achieve an

effluent total phosphorus  concentration of less than  1 mg.L'1,  even

though the soluble  phosphorus may be as low as 0.1  rng.L"1.
Extremely low levels of  effluent total phosphorus of  <0.3 mg.L l

are only attainable through tertiary filtration.

PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL  FROM  LAGOONS

The requirement of  phosphorus removal from some 80  lagoons  in

Ontario is dependent upon  location and/or size of facility.   It

has been Ontario's  experience that high levels of phosphorus re-

moval can be attained at all types of lagoons.  The approach to

implementing a phosphorus  removal scheme depends considerably upon

the lagoon type.

AERATED LAGOONS

Sewage pumping stations  are ideal locations for adding alum or

ferric chloride to  the influent of aerated cells.   A  high degree of

mixing prior to reaching the lagoon is ensured.  As with activated
                                 17

-------
sludge plants the successful and quick implementation of



phosphorus control depends on following the typical jar test



procedures.





While several aerated lagoons are successfully removing phosphorus



using alum and ferric chloride, Ontario's experience has been that




lime is not effective (18,19).




CONVENTIONAL STABILIZATION PONDS



Phosphorus removal is achieved by the continuous addition of alum



or ferric chloride to the influent (18).  Jar testing, excluding



lime, should be conducted to determine optimum chemical and approxi-



mate dosage requirements.  Unless there is concern over inadequate



mixing, full-scale tests are unnecessary.





SEASONAL RETENTION PONDS



Ontario's experience in phosphorus removal from seasonal retention



ponds favors batch treatment prior to discharge (20).  Jar tests




again provide valuable information but the dosage selected should be



the one which reduced the phosphorus concentration to approximately



0.5 mg.L"1.  Batch treatment should be carried out by having the



chemical in its liquid state contained in a 600-700 I plastic tank



mounted amidships in a 5 m, 70 HP outboard motorboat.  Chemical



dispersal occurs through a 50 mm siphon discharging into the prop



wash while traversing the lagoon.  Even, rapid chemical distribution



and good mixing are prerequisites.  This type of treatment has been



extremely successful»





Effluent quality after treatment is usually less than 10 mg.L"1



BOD and 20 mg.L"1 SS with total phosphorus generally less than 0.5
                                 18

-------
mg.L""1.  It  is desirable to complete the  discharge of the lagoon

contents within an  8-10 day period after  treatment,  otherwise a

slight deterioration in effluent quality  is experienced  after about

2 weeks  (20).


SLUDGE GENERATION AND HANDLING

The  topic of sludge  generation, handling  and disposal at phosphorus

control facilities was recently presented at the  Cornell 1979

Conference  (21).  A  few summary highlights have been extracted.

Figures 12 and 13 illustrate the increase in sludge  volume and mass

for  primary  and secondary plants using metal salt addition.

Figure 12 shows a 60% increase in  sludge  volume when metal salts are

added  to the primary plant  to meet the  1 mg.L-1  effluent total
              8.000
              1,000
              7.000
              6.000-
              5.000-
              4.000-
              3.000-
              2000-
              1.000-
     0(1)
     /



  ' (I)*-* BEFORE CHEMCAL ADDITION
 /  (gal/MG waslewater treated)
/  (2)o-o AFTER CHEMICAL ADDITION
    (gal/MG wastewater treated)
   (3)«—• BEFORE CHEMCAL ADDITION
     *yaofcts/MG waatewater treated)

      (4)
                                          MG-106gal
                 2  5 K>  2O 30 4O SO 60 70 80  BO  OS  86 89  886899
                     X of observations equal to or less than stated value
              (Ibs.  dry solids/MGH 10  = kg/1000 m3

           FIGURE 12,   PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION FOR SLUDGE PRODUCED
                       AT PRIMARY PLANTS WITH ADDITION OF METAL SALTS, (22)
                                    19

-------
phosphorus target.  The  sludge mass  increased  by 40%.   Similarly,

sludge volume  and mass increased by  35% and 26%  respectively for

activated sludge plants  where metal  salts had  been added  to the

aeration tanks (Figure 13).
              •.000
              3JOOO-
              2 .OOO- •
                    It) •—• BEFORE CHEMCM. MOTION<8«lA«G mwwatw IraaMd)
                    (21 0—0 Iff fa OCMCAL ADDITION (galAC «rul*Mt*r MMd)
                    (3) «—« BEFORE OCMCM. MOTION (b »» loMlAe MMMWr trMIM)
                    (4) *—• AFTER CXMCM. ADDITION (b »y Mt(t«A
-------
             TABLE 5,   SLUDGE PRODUCTION-SUGGESTED DESIGN
                       DATA (22)
System
g capita"^"1
Conventional Primary 77
Upgraded Primary 109
Conventional A.S. 114
Upgraded A.S.b 145
Sludge
Volume
1 of
Influent
0.20
0.32
0.38
0.51
Quantity
kg d.s./IO'm'
120
170
173
218
             *Based on Q • 656 i capita' d  .

             d.s.    « dry sol ids.
Primary + waste activated.
SLUDGE DIGESTION

Before sludges can be  disposed of in Ontario, they are digested.

In general, sludges  from Ontario phosphorus removal facilities

have been found to be  readily digestible in both existing aerobic

and anaerobic digesters.   Initial problems which were experienced

could be related to  the  increase in sludge loading rather than  the

nature of the sludge itself.   This increased digester loading

has resulted in inadequate heat exchanger capacity which led to

operational problems caused by reduced digester temperature.  Di-

gester (primary) foaming due to increased volatile solids loading

and inadequate gas/liquid separation has in some cases led to

further operational problems.

Inhibitive effects due to accumulated metal salts have never been

experienced.  In one case (23), digester operation was completely

disrupted due to erratic lime dosing for phosphorus removal during

start-up.  This resulted in periodic massive doses of high pH
                                  21

-------
sludge being pumped to the digester until  the  digesters'  buffer-

ing capacity was exceeded.

Later, under continuous operation, the digester  was  found to oper-

ate very effectively provided a sludge blanket of  0.3-0.5 m was

maintained in the clarifier.  This partially neutralized  the raw

sludge to a pH of 8.5-9.0.

Phosphorus resolubilization within the digester  has  been  found to

be insignificant in relation to the total  plant  loading,  regard-

less of the chemical used.

SLUDGE UTILIZATION AND DISPOSAL

As shown in Table 6, the most common method of sewage  sludge dis-

posal in Ontario is land application of  liquid digested sludge to

agricultural lands.  The application of  sludge to  agricultural

lands is governed by Provincial Guidelines (6).  Every effort is

made to dispose and at the same time utilize the sludge for its

            TABLE 6,   SLUDGE DISPOSAL METHODS PRACTICED IN
                     ONTARIO(22)
Method of Disposal
Application to
Agricultural Lands
Incineration
Landfill Application
Dumpsite
Storage Lagoon
Drying Beds
TOTAL
No. of
Plants
98

3
17
14
7
16
155
Percent of
Total Plants
63.2

2.0
11.0
9.0
4.5
10.3
100
Wt of Sludge
(dry tons/yr)
52,900

62,000
35,000

5,800
	
155.700
Percent of
Total Wt
34.0

39.8
22.5

3.7
.
100
potential nutrient value and soil builder characteristics.   The

Guidelines take cognizance of this potential nutrient value  but

at the same time ensure that no appreciable metal build-up in  the
                                 22

-------
soil  will  occur.   Details  concerning Ontario's experience have

been  reported on  elsewhere  (21).

FULL  SCALE PHOSPHORUS  REMOVAL COSTS

The costs  depicted in  Figures 14  and 15,  are  capital and operating

cost  data  from  64 Ontario plants  which  had been practising phos-
                °
f  4
5  2
                     CAPITAL COSTS
                     (1975 Dollars)
                                   UNEAR REGRESSION 4
                                   95% CONFDENCE BAND
                                   lmgd-4546m'/d
                 0  2  4  6   81012141618202224
                             CAPACITY (mgd)

           FIGURE 14,   PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EQUIPMENT-CAPITAL
                        COSTS,  (24)
  12

•g »H

3. 8



   4

   2

   0
                     OPERATIONAL COSTS
                        (l975Dolars)
                                    UNEAR REGRESSION &
                                    95% CONFIDENCE BAND
                                    1 mgd-4546 m'/d
                 0   2  4  6  81012141618202224
                             CAPACITY (mgd)
                 *Cotts Exclude Chwrical Costs

             FIGURE 15,    PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL-OPERATIONAL COSTS,
                                    23

-------
phorus removal for 3-6 years prior to the survey  (24).   The cost

data can be  adjusted to 1979 dollars by using a multiplication

factor of  1.38.   This is based  on  the Marshall and  Swift index of

451 for 1975  and 621 for 1979.   The operational costs shown in

Figure 15  exclude the cost of chemicals.

Chemical costs represent invariably the largest fraction of the

total operating cost of the phosphorus removal facility component.

Table 7 shows a percentage breakdown of the total annual costs for

a 4500 mM"1   P-removal facility.


           TABLE 7,   TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS FOR A 4500 flV1
                     P-REMOVAL FACILITY (25)
                                Percentage of Total Annual Coat
            Proceaa Option
                               Capital   O^ical.
                                              Maintenance
                Pri»ary            19      40      41
             Metallic salt            19      70      11
             Lla» Tertiary            31      24      45
Actual chemical costs  (1976)  for  operating facilities have ranged

from $0.55  to $17. per 1000 m3  of sewage treated  in the plants

surveyed.   The average being  $5.  per 1000 m3 treated.

CURRENT PICTURE

The initial and current distribution of chemical  usage at Ontario

phosphorus  removal facilities is  summarized in Table 8 (26).  As


           TABLE 8,  CHEMICAL USAGE DISTRIBUTION  (26)
Chemical

Aluminum Sulfate
Iron Salts
Lime
None
Initial
(*>)
32
60
5
3
1976
(%)
25
64
6
5
1979
(%)
26
70
2
2
                                  24

-------
shown,  the type of chemical used  for phosphorus  removal has  changed

little  over the years.    It should  be noted, however, that the

number  of plants using  lime has decreased dramatically.  This in

part is attributable  to the fact  that plant operators do not like

lime and their bad experiences with lime feeding equipment.

Figure  16 summarizes  the current  status of phosphorus removal

technology for Ontario's primary  and secondary treatment plants.

Since 1973 the total  number of plants practicing phosphorus

removal has increased from 111 to 272 in 1979, out of a total of

340 plants.  This represents 87%  of the total hydraulic plant capac-

ity in  Ontario.




MFLUENT
BOD 136
SS 208
TP 61

COAGULANT
LME 185
or
ALUM 100
% EFFLUENT
F* * , 	 \ BOD5 45
/ \ SS 37
t nr.ruT.on f PRIMARY \ TP 20
t ACruTOM •^CLARIFERJ 	 ••
WASTE SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS
Whom*
TO-,
75-1 _
iwj n60 £
»•! H *
Oi 1.1 1
Ul
Dry Wl
JOOO-,
BOO- r-i1700
OOO* i '1 1200
BOO- ftoCMCALS ,
-X



WASTE
SLUDGE
PRIMARY PLANT
iv^k «• 4IV1/I i JllJ»l «-Mlir •!• 1 ntliii i i 1
                   COAGULANT DOSE (Avge)
                    [ UME 70 mg/L
             »IFLUENT
             BOOjIM
COAGULANT DOSE (Avge)
 Fe*3 11
  or
ALUM 65
EFFLUENT
BODb 13
SS  20
TP  12
                                 -WASTE SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS

                                            Dry Wl
                          VWSTE SLUDGE
                                   SECONDARY PLANT
                                 t «rt mg/L urMM vidcaWd attrnw
                                                     # 1975 data
           FIGURE 16,   TYPICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES,  (27)
                                   25

-------
Having  removed all this phosphorus  over the years,  the obvious ques-

tion is raised: "Are  we seeing any  response by  improved lake

water quality?"  Data summarized  (28)  recently  as shown in  Figure

17 does indeed show an encouraging  decreasing trend in both total
                  687072m  76 78  BO  B2  84 66
                                             |26
              SMOOTHED TREND OF
              TOTAL PHOSPHORUS

                    \ £
              SMOOTHED TREND OF SOLUBLE B
              REACTIVE PHOSPHORUS
-24


•22


•20



-18



-16


-M



 12
                                               PROPOSED TOTAL
                                               P GOAL
                                               PROPOSED
                                               SRPQOAL
                  68  70  72  » 76- 78  60  82  84  86 "
                              YEAR
        FIGURE 17,   LAKE ONTARIO PHOSPHORUS  IN SPRING 1969 TO 1979,  (28)



and  soluble reactive  phosphorus  in the offshore  waters of Lake

Ontario.


This paper paper  has  focused on  phosphorus  control even  though nitro-

gen  has in some cases been found to be nutrient  limiting.


In Ontario several municipal and industrial treatment plants
                                     26

-------
nitrify their effluents.  In these instances local water quality



requirements dictate that nitrification be practiced.   In general



though, nitrogen removal is not required in Ontario.




FUTURE DIRECTIONS



The new Canada-United States Agreement signed in 1978 reaffirms



among other things the objectives outlined in the 1972 Agreement.



As far as nutrients are concerned lower targets of 0.5 mg.L"1 for



point-discharges from municipal plants in the Lower Great Lakes



are advocated.




Before embarking on this course of action the question of other



phosphorus management strategies to meet the loading targets for



the various Great Lakes has to be examined.  The IJC Task Force on



Phosphorus Management Strategies has recently addressed this aspect



and has now (July 1980) delivered its final report to the IJC's



Great Lakes Water Quality Board and Great Lakes Science Advisory



Board.




It would seem reasonable though that regardless of any other new



phosphorus management strategy or strategies, every effort be made



that the initial target of 1.0 mg.L""1 total effluent phosphorus



concentration be met.  Larger plants may also be in a position to



produce effluents with lower than 1.0 mg.L"1 total phosphorus con-



centration at little extra expense.




The question of phosphorus availability, its significance vis-a-vis



waste treatment processes and impact on phosphorus management



strategies remains to be resolved.
                                 27

-------
Promising  new technologies which  require  no or  reduced amounts of

chemical precipitants for phosphorus are  under  development and

demonstration, which, once proven will  be implemented.

SUMMARY

This  paper  outlined  the phosphorus control  program embarked on by

Canada and  specifically identified the highly successful  joint

venture between the  Governments of Canada and the Province of

Ontario in  this regard.


Some  technical points of  significance which should be  of  interest

to others are:

       7 .    Reduction* in laundry detergent pho*phoru* concentration*
            resulted Jin. at leaAt 20% town*, influent pho*phoru*
            cen&iation* to treatment p£an£s, hence  lower precipitant
            cnem*.ca£ do*age Jie.quuAe.me.nti> , and le**  Aludge volume gener-
            ated.

       2.    A program ojj treatabitity Atudie* i*  a  prerequisite to
           technology jJoA pho&pkotwiA titmovaJt at &)UAting
                     ptant!>.
       3.    T/ie metal. Aoltb oft Vwn and aluminum ate equally populaA. OA
            a. cno,cce oft px.e.cj.pitant 
-------
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



 The author is indebted to a number of his colleagues,especially



 Mr. S.A. Black, Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Dr. E.E.



 Shannon, Canviro Consultants,for making some of the information




 presented herein, available.







 REFERENCES
 1. O.E.C.D., "Eutrophication in Large Lakes and Impoundments."



    (Proceedings of a Symposium held at Uppsala, Sweden, May 1968)



 2. Canada Water Year Book, Environmental Management Service,



    Fisheries and Environment Canada, 1976.




3.   International Joint Commission, "Pollution of Lake Erie, Lake



    Ontario and the International Section of the St. Lawrence



    River," Vol.  1, Summary (1969).



4.   "Canada-Ontario Agreement on the Lower Great Lakes Water



    Quality." (August 1971.)



5.   Urban Drainage Subcommittee of the Canada-Ontario Agreement



    on Great Lakes Water Quality, "Manual of Practice on Urban



    Drainage."



6.   Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food - Ontario Ministry of



    the Environment, "Guidelines for Sewage Sludge Utilization on



    Agricultural Lands," (April, 1978).



7.   International Reference Group on Great Lakes Pollution from



    Land Use Activities (PLUARG), "Environmental Management



    Strategy for the Great Lakes System."  Final Report to the



    International Joint Commission  (July 1978) .
                                29

-------
8.  Van Fleet,  G.L.,  "Phosphorus Removal in Ontario," Phosphorus



    Design Seminar, Canada-Ontario Agreement Conference Proceedings



    No. 1, (1973).



9.  Ministry of the Environment, "Operating Summary - Water Pollu-



    tion Control Projects," (1978).




10.  Stepko, W.E. and E.E.  Shannon, "Phosphorus Removal Demonstra-



    tion Study Using Ferric Chloride and Alum at C.F.B. Uplands,"



    Environment Canada, Environmental Protection Service Report



    EPS 4-WP-74-5.



11.  Black, S.A., "Experience with Phosphorus Removal at Existing



    Ontario Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants," Chapter 13,



    Phosphorus Management Strategies for Lakes, Loehr, Martin and



    Rast, editors*Ann Arbor Science, publishers (1980).



12.  Prested, B.P.,  et al., "Development of Prediction Models for



    Chemical Phosphorus Removal, Volume 1," Canada-Ontario Agree-



    ment Research Report No. 68 (1977).



13.  Shannon, E.E. and R.J. Rush, "Phosphorus Removal Treatability



    Studies at C.F.B. Borden, Petawawa, Trenton and Uplands,"



    Environment Canada, Environmental Protection Service Report



    EPS 4-WP-73-5.



14.  Shannon, E.E."Physical-Chemical Phosphorus Removal Processes,"



    presented  at the Nutrient Control Seminar, Calgary, Alberta



    (February, 1980) .



15.  Prested, B.P., E.E. Shann and  R.J. Rush, "Development of Pre-



    diction Models for Chemical Phosphorus Removal, Volume II,"



     Canada-Ontario Agreement Research Report No.  78,  (1978) .
                                 30

-------
16. Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers, "Process Design
    Manual for Phosphorus Removal," Report to U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Program #170.0GNP  (1971).
17. Boyko, B.I. and J.W.G. Rupke, "Phosphorus Removal Within Exist-
    ing Wastewater Treatment Facilities," Canada-Ontario Agreement
    Research Report No. 44 (1976).
18. Graham, H.J. and R.B. Hunsinger, "Phosphorus Reduction from
    Continuous Overflow Lagoons by Addition of Coagulants to
    Influent Sewage," Canada-Ontario Agreement Research Report No.
    65, (1977) .
19. Ahlberg, N.R., "Phosphorus Removal in a Facultative Aerated
    Lagoon - Grimsby WPCP," Ontario Ministry of the Environment,
    Research Branch,(July 1973).
20. Graham, H.J. and R.B. Hunsinger, "Phosphorus Removal in Sea-
    sonal Retention Lagoons by Batch Chemical Precipitation,"
    Canada-Ontario Agreement Research Report No. 13, (1971).
21. Schmidtke, N.W.,  "Sludge Generation, Handling and Disposal
    at Phosphorus Control Facilities," Chapter 15, Phosphorus
    Management Strategies for Lakes, Loehr, Martin and Rast, editors;
    Ann Arbor Science, publishers, (1980) .
22. Antonic, M., M.F. Hamoda, D.B. Cohen and N.W. Schmidtke, "A
    Survey of Ontario Sludge Disposal Practices", Project No.
    74-3-19, Canada-Ontario Agreement Research Report (in press).
23. Black, S.A., "Anaerobic Digestion of Lime Sewage Sludge,"
    Canada-Ontario Agreement Research Report No. 50, (1976).
24. Archer, J., "Summary Report on Phosphorus Removal", Canada-
    Ontario Agreement Research Report No. 83, (1978).
                                31

-------
25. Schmidtke, N.W.,  "Coagulation and P-Removal," Lecture presented



    at the IAWPR Post-Conference Continuing Education Course,



    University of Melbourne, Australia,(October 23-26, 1976).




26. Rupke, J.W.G., "Operational Experience in Phosphorus Removal,"



    Chapter 14, Phosphorus Management Strategies for Lakes, Loehr,



    Martin and Rast,  editors; Ann Arbor  Science, publishers,



    (1980).



27. Schmidtke, N.W. and D.B. Cohen, "Municipal Sludge Disposal



    on Land, A Down-to-Earth Solution," presented at the 29th



    Annual Convention of the Western Canada Water and Sewage



    Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, September 29-30, 1977.



28. Dobson, H., "Observed Phosphorus in Lake Ontario," Great Lakes



    Focus on Water Quality, 6(1), April 1980.  International



    Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario.









Appendix A to this paper summarizes the many phosphorus related



studies conducted in Ontario, over the past 8 years.




Appendix B identifies nitrogen conversion/removal studies con-



ducted under the Canada-Ontario Agreement.
                                32

-------
                               APPENDIX A
PHOSPHORUS RELATED STUDIES
                    Project Title
                                                         Report Number*
TOPIC - 1.  Phosphorus Removal - Primary and Secondary Treatment Plants
Phosphorus Removal at the Sarnia Water Pollution
Control Plant
The Use of Lime in the Treatment of Municipal
Wastewaters
Phosphorus Removal Treatability Studies at CFB Borden,
Petawawa, Trenton and Uplands
Full Scale Phosphorus Removal at CFB Petawawa
(Primary Plant)
Phosphorus Removal Demonstration Study Using Ferric
Chloride and Alum at CFB Uplands
Phosphorus Removal Within Existing Wastewater Treatment
Facilities
Phosphorus Removal Demonstration Studies at CFB Trenton
Phase I
Phase II
Phosphorus Removal Demonstration Studies Using Lime,
Alum and Ferric Chloride at CFB Borden
Phosphorus Removal Design Seminar, Toronto, 1973
Integration of Physico-Chemical and Biological
Wastewater Treatment Processes
                                                              14

                                                              21

                                                         EPS 4-WP-73-5

                                                         EPS 4-WP-74-3

                                                         EPS 4-WP-74-5

                                                              44
                                                         EPS 4-WP-74-9
                                                         EPS 4-WP-76-4
                                                         EPS 4-WP-78-2
                                                         1 (Conf.  Proc.)
                                                               7
TOPIC -2.  Phosphorus Removal - Lagoons
Nutrient Control in Sewage Lagoons
Volume I
Volume II
Phosphorus Removal in Seasonal Retention Lagoons by
Batch Chemical Precipitation
Spray Runoff Disposal of Waste Stabilization Pond
Effluent
Phosphorus Reduction from Continuous Overflow Lagoons
by Addition of Coagulants to Influent Sewage
                                                               8
                                                              23
                                                              13

                                                              22

                                                              65
TOPIC - 3.  Process Control
Chemical Control for Phosphorus Removal
 Individual numbers refer to reports published in the Canada-Ontario
 Agreement Research Report and Conference Proceedings (Conf.  Proc.)
 Series.
 EPS numbers are reports published in the Environmental Protection
 Service, Environment Canada, Report Series.
                                    33

-------
 PHOSPHORUS  RELATED STUDIES  (CONT'D.)
Project Title
TOPIC - 4. Prediction Models

Development of Prediction Models for Chemical
Phosphorus Removal
Volume I
Volume II
TOPIC 5. Sources of Chemicals

Use and Production of Iron Salts for Phosphorus Removal
Utilization of Industrial Wastes and Waste By-products
for Phosphorus Removal: An Inventory and Assessment
Utilization of Aluminized Red Mud Solids (ARMS) for
Phosphorus Removal
TOPIC 6. Chemical Aids

Assessment of Polyelectrolytes for Phosphorus Removal
TOPIC 7. Process Studies

Design and Performance Criteria for Settling Tanks for
the Removal of Physical Chemical Floes
Volume I
Volume II
TOPIC 8. Polishing Processes

Effluent Polishing by Filtration Through Activated
Alumina
Volume I
Volume II
Tertiary Phosphorus Removal and Limiting Nutrient
Studies at CFS Lac St. Denis
The We Hand Canal Water Quality Experiments
Report Number*

68
78

5
6
EPS 4-WP-75-2

37

10
56

39
40
EPS 4-WP-74-1
EPS 4-WP-74-10
* Individual numbers refer to reports published in the Canada-Ontario
  Agreement Research Report and Conference Proceedings (Conf. Proc.)
  Series.
  EPS numbers are reports published in the Environmental Protection
  Service, Environment Canada, Report Series.
                                   34

-------
PHOSPHORUS RELATED STUDIES (CONT'Dj)
                      Project Title
Report Number*
TOPIC - 9.  Detergent Substitution Studies
Effect of Citrate and Carbonate Based Detergents on
Wastewater Characteristics and Treatment
A Study of NTA Degradation in a Receiving Stream
Detergent Substitution Studies at CFS Gloucester
Impact of Nitrilotriacetic Acid (NTA) on an Activated
Sludge Plant
Activated Sludge Degradation of Nitrilotriactic Acid
(NTA) - Metal Complexes	
       61

PS 4-WP-74-7

PS 4-WP-73-3
       91

PS 4-WP-78-5
TOPIC 10.  Sludges
a)  Dewatering/Conditioning

    Sludge Dewatering Design Manual

b)  Digestion Processes

    Aerobic Digestion of Organic Sludges Containing
    Inorganic Phosphorus Precipitates
    Phase I
    Volume I

    Anaerobic Digestion of Lime Sewage Sludge

c)  Application to Land

    Land Application of Sewage Sludge
    Heavy Metals in Agricultural Lands Receiving
    Chemical Sewage Sludges
    Volume I
    Volume II
    Volume III
    Volume IV
    Land Disposal of Sewage Sludge (Field Studies)
    Volume I
    Volume II
    Volume III
    Volume IV
    Volume V
    Volume VI
    Volume VII
    Land Application of Digested Sludge Under Adverse
    Conditions
    Air-Dried Chemical Sewage Sludge Disposal on Agricultur-
    al Land
    Volume I
    Phosphate Fertilizer and Sewage Sludge Use on Agricultur
    al Land - The Potential for Cadmium Uptake by Crops
       72
        3
       58
       50
        9
       25
       30
       51

       16
       24
       35
       60
       73
       90
       98

       53
 EPS 4-WP-78-3
 EPS 4-WP-79-2
    Chemical Sewage Sludge Disposal on Land (Lysimeter Studies)
    Volume I                                                        67
    Volume II                                                       79
    *Individual numbers refer to reports published in the CanadarOntario
     Agreement Research Report and Conference Proceedings (Conf.Proc.) Series
     EPS numbers are reports published in the Environmental Protection
     Service, Environment Canada, Report Series.
                                      35

-------
PHOSPHORUS RELATED STUDIES (CONT'D.)
Project Title
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
Heat Processes
Wet Air Oxidation of Chemical sludges
Evaluation of the Barber-Coleman Wetox Process for
Sewage Sludge Disposal
Sludge Incineration and Precipitant Recovery
Volume I
Volume II
Volume III
Recovery of Materials from Process Residuals
Recycling of Incinerator Ash
Removal of Phosphates and Metals from Sewage Sludge
The Removal and Recovery of Metals from Sludge and
Sludge Incinerator Ash
Reuse of Waste S02 and Phosphate Sewage Sludge by
Solidification with Lime and Fly Ash
Health Hazards
Examination of Sewage and Sewage Sludge for
En terovi ruses
Volume I
Volume II
Computer-aided Planning of Regional Sludge Disposal
Systems
Analysis
The Analysis of Chemical Digester Sludges for Metals
by Several Laboratory Groups
Development of an Efficient Sampling Strategy
to Characterize Digested Sludges
Sludge Handling and Disposal Seminar, Toronto,
1974 and 1978

Report Number*
12
20
31
74
75
19
28
33
69
27
52
46
EPS 4-WP-78-1
71
2 & 6
(Conf .Proc.)
* Individual numbers refer to reports published in the Canada-Ontario
  Agreement Research Report and Conference Proceedings (Conf. Proc.)
  Series.
  EPS numbers are reports published in the Environmental Protection
  Service, Environment Canada, Report Series.
                                      36

-------
                                APPENDIX B
 NITROGEN RELATED STUDIES
                      Project Title
Report Number*
 TOPIC - 1.  Nitrification
 Reliability of Nitrification Systems with Integrated
 Phosphorus Precipitation
        64
 TOPIC - 2.  Denitrification
 Continuous Biological Denitrification of
 Wastewater

 Evaluation of Industrial Waste Carbon Sources
 for Biological Denitrification
  EPS 4-WP-74-6


  EPS 4-WP-79-9
 TOPIC - 3.  Nitrification-Denitrification
 Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater

 Nitrification-Denitrification of Wastewater
 Using a Single Sludge System
 Volume I
 Volume II

 Single Sludge Nitrogen Removal
 Systems
        17
        86
        96
        88
* Individual numbers refer to reports published in the Canada-Ontario
  Agreement Research Report and Conference Proceedings (Conf.  Proc.)
  Series.
  EPS numbers are reports published in the Environmental Protection
  Service, Environment Canada, Report Series.
                                    37

-------
             PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN LOWER GREAT LAKES
                   MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS

                        Joseph V. DePinto
                     Michael S. Switzenbaum
                         Thomas C. Young
                        James K. Edzwald
        Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
                 Clarkson College of Technology
INTRODUCTION

The North American Great Lakes contain approximately 20 percent

of the world's supply of surface freshwater and, as such, are

indispensible resources worthy of every effort possible to

protect and preserve their quality.  With respect to eutrophi-

cation control, it has been determined that reducing and

restricting phosphorus inputs is the best approach for the Great

Lakes.  The International Joint Commission  (IJC) of Canada and

the United States recognized the need for phosphorus control in

its 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.  This agreement

called for, among other things, the achievement by all plants

discharging more than one million gallons per day of "effluent

concentrations of 1.0 milligram per litre total phosphorus

maximum for plants in the basins of Lakes Superior, Michigan,

and Huron, and 0.5 milligram per litre total phosphorus maximum

for plants in the basins of Lakes Ontario and Erie." (IJC,1978).


The 1978 Agreement also provided for an eighteen month review

to confirm the cited phosphorus load limitation, followed by the
                              39

-------
establishment of load allocations and compliance schedules.



The purpose of this study was to provide information that might



be useful in making recommendations regarding phosphorus load



reduction requirements for municipal treatment plants in the



lower Great Lakes basins.





There are several questions related to the efficacy and desira-



bility of a 0.5 mg/L lower lakes municipal effuent phosphorus



standard which were addressed in this study.  The current



status of municipal treatment plant activities in the lower



lakes with respect to phosphorus removal has been evaluated.



Such questions as "what are the prevalent approaches being taken



to reduce phosphorus effluent concentrations to 1.0 mg/L" and



"what technological needs would the treatment plants have to



reduce total phosphorus effluent levels to 0.5 mg/L or any point



below 1.0 mg/L" have been addressed.  Also, there is a need to



know the reliability with which full scale treatment operation



can operate at the various phosphorus reduction performance



levels.





In addition to the technological aspect of establishing a phos-



phorus treatment regulation for the lower lakes treatment



plants, prudent use of the taxpayer's money requires systematic



evaluation of the relationship between costs incurred and phos-



phorus effluent performance.  These costs could then be weighed



against the economic and environmental benefits of various



phosphorus effluent limitations below 1.0 mg/L.  This type of
                               40

-------
cost analysis at the individual treatment plant level is

examined in this study.  Costs data gathered in this study can

provide crucial information and confirmation of assumptions

necessary to make basin-wide cost projections for various munici-

pal phosphorus management programs.


In order to address the questions posed in the above discussion,

this study contained the following three-phase approach:

     • A survey was made of all municipal treatment plants in
       the lower Great Lakes basins with effluent flows
       greater than 1 MGD.  The purpose of the survey was to
       evaluate the phosphorus treatment approaches and plant
       performance and to confirm municipal phosphorus loads.

     • A detailed field operation monitoring program was
       conducted at four treatment plants practicing phos-
       phorus removal processes representative of lower Great
       Lakes basin plants.  The performance of these plants
       was evaluate in terms of removal of various phosphorus
       fractions and the overall effluent quality as a
       function of the phosphorus removal process employed.

     • A detailed analysis of costs incurred at the four
       selected treatment plants was made for the existing
       level of treatment.  With these data as a base,
       estimates were made for costs associated with
       phosphorus removal.

                                                 \
SURVEY METHODS

In order to meet the objectives of the project, it was felt that

several important pieces of information had to be gathered on

every treatment plant in the Lake Erie and Lake Ontario basins

with a discharge flow greater than 1 MGD.  It was, therefore,

determined that the following information be obtained for the

plants in question:

       Identification of the location of treatment plant in
       terms of lake basin, regulatory unit, county, city and
       receiving water body.
                               41

-------
     •  Identification of type of treatment plant (eg.
       conventional activated sludge, extended aeration,
       trickling filter, primary treatment only, etc.)

     •  Identification of method of phosphorus removal,
       including point of chemical additions and any tertiary
       processes associated with P removal (such as filtration,
       sedimentation, etc.).

     •  Identification of annual average daily flow and design
       flow as well as total P concentrations in the raw
       sewage and plant effluent.

It was determined that there are 229 municipal treatment plants

in the lower Great Lakes basins with a discharge greater than 1

MGD (3785 m /d).  The above information was obtained for these

plants primarily from a questionnaire, which elicited a 66 per-

cent response.  Although not all of the above information was

obtained from every plant, a flow and effluent phosphorus

concentration has been assigned to each of the 229 plants,

either from the questionnaire data or from an independent IJC

survey (IJC, 1979).


TREATMENT PLANT MONITORING PROCEDURES

Four different treatment plants were intensively monitored

during the field 'study phase of this project, which was

performed during July and August, 1979.  Each of the four treat-

ment plants was visited for a two-week period, during which time

12 to 15 eight-hour composite samples  (24 hour composites at the

Frank Van Lare plant) were collected from three key locations

within each plant.  The sampling points for each plant were

selected in an effort to isolate the effect of the phosphorus

removal procedure.  Presented in Table 1 is a listing of the

sampling locations which were used at each plant.
                               42

-------
      TABLE 1.    SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN MONITORED  TREATMENT PLANTS
   Plant Name
Sampling Location Name    Location Characteristics
Gates-Chili-Ogden
Frank Van Lare
Big Sister Creek
Ely
  Raw Influent

  Primary Effluent

  Secondary Effluent


  Raw Influent

  Alum Effluent


  Biological  Effluent


  Raw Influent

  Secondary Effluent

  Filtered Effluent


  Raw Effluent

  Secondary Effluent

  Filtered Effluent
Sample taken from aerated grit
chamber
Sample taken from weir of
primary clarifier
Sample taken from weir of
final clarifier

Sample taken from aerated grit
chamber
Sample taken from weir of
primary clarifier after alum
treatment
Sample taken from weir of
final clarifier

Sample taken from post-
screening wet well
Sample taken from weir of
secondary clarifier
Sample taken from sand
filter effluent channel

Sample taken from aerated grit
chamber
Sample taken from weir of
secondary clarifier
Sample taken from dual media
filter effluent channel
                                      43

-------
A flow chart of the analyses performed on the composite samples



is presented in Figure 1.  Each composite sample was analyzed



on-site for chemical oxygen demand  (COD), suspended solids  (SS),



pH, alkalinity, soluble reactive phosphorus  (SRP), total phos-



phorus (TP), total particulate phosphorus (TPP), and "available



phosphorus" (AP) as defined by NaOH extraction.  Less frequently,



on-site analyses were performed to determine total Kjeldahl



nitrogen (TKN), nitrate and nitrite nitrogen (NO ), and five-day
                                                X


biochemical oxygen demand  (BOD5).  Phosphorus precipitation



cations (Al   and Fe  )  were measured off-site on sub-samples



taken in connection with the less frequent series of on-site



analyses.





For the most part the analytical methods used in this study were



according to Standard Methods  (APHA, 1975) and/or recommended by



EPA (1976) .  Additionally, the determination of the total NaOH-



extractable fraction of particulate phosphorus was made by an



extraction method similar to that of Sagher, et al.  (1975).



Inasmuch as the particulates of interest in this investigation



were from municipal wastewaters and, thus, contained relatively



labile organic phosphorus, it was decided to measure the total



phosphorus in the extracts (rather than inorganic P only) for



comparison with bioassay tests of particulate phosphorus bio-



availability to algae.





As a verification of the chemical analysis of phosphorus avail-



ability in the wastewaters, a bioassay of algal-available



soluble and particulate phosphorus was conducted on selected
                               44

-------
                        TIT
                          o
                          to
                          10
                          o
                          g
                         CD
 co
 cod.

f^
 i  .
"c.
= 1
CL <

>^
o
c
0)
•3
jz cr
O> 0)
ir ul


__
^ 1
3> 

^
Q.
Analyses
(3-6 subsam
nor ninnt ^

Q
0 i
0 \

to
a>
a —
°l
s |l
«0 3
>- W i.
0 OJ S
< i








<%
5
1
X

1.

%
L
L




















C
0
0
U.
/

hs..
V.
c
0
•*••
0
l_
iZ
/

















D

£L
<
i '















Q.
cr

<
#*
£






Q.
Q_
i


                                                                                       10
                                                                                       01
 (O
oo

 i.
 OJ
4J
 
 to
 (O
                                                                                       s-
                                                                                       o
                                                                                       to
                                                                                       u
                                                                                       (O
                                                                                       c
                                                                                       03
                                                                                       i.
                                                                                       C7)
                                                                                       (O
                                                                                       O
                                                                                       a>

                                                                                       3
                             45

-------
samples from each plant (see Figure 1).   While it is generally



accepted that only a bioassay can be used to measure truly



available phosphorus, the details of the experimental pro-



cedures vary widely  (DePinto, 1978a).   We have selected an



approach which employs a direct measurement of phosphorus taken



up by a test algal species, thus overcoming the problems



associated with indirect estimates relating algal growth to



phosphorus uptake.  Furthermore, our approach provides for the



separation of the assay algae from the particulate material in




the plant effluent, which is a prerequisite for direct measure-



ment of algal phosphorus.






Given the above considerations it was determined a dual culture



approach similar to that currently being used in our laboratory



(DePinto, 1978b)  would circumvent many of the problems



associated with bioassay determination of available phosphorus




from particulates.  The apparatus employed (hereafter referred



to as a Dual Culture Diffusion Apparatus - DCDA)  allows a



suspension of particulate matter from a wastewater sample to be



placed in one culture vessel (regeneration vessel) and the



placement of a unialgal assay culture (with a known P content)



in a separate assay vessel.  The two vessels would be clamped



together but the contents would be separated by a 0.4 ym



membrane filter.   This set-up permits repeated, routine sampling




of the algae in the assay vessel without disturbing the



particle-water system in the regeneration vessel.  The membrane



between the two vessels would prevent cross-contamination of
                               46

-------
particulates but would allow cross-diffusion of soluble material



 (including P released from the particle-water suspension).  Any




available phosphorus released by the material in the regener-



ation vessel will have a tendency to diffuse across the membrane



to the assay vessel where it will be rapidly immobilized by the



P-starved algae.  By periodically sampling the phosphorus



content of the assay vessel and performing a mass balance on the



system one can determine the extent to which phosphorus is being



released by the particulates.  Details of DCDA operation and data



analysis can be found in McKosky (1978).






In addition to the above analysis on the suspended solids in a



sample, a bioassay of algal available P was performed on the



soluble fraction.  To bioassay the fraction of total soluble



 (less than 0.45 iam) phosphorus in these samples that is



available for algal uptake, a simple sequential batch uptake



experiment was performed.  A filtered wastewater sample was



inoculated with algae of a known phosphorus content and subse-



quently harvested after a 3-5 day growth period to measure the



phosphorus taken up by the algae.  This procedure was repeated



until no further uptake occurred.  The cumulative algal-uptake



of phosphorus represented that portion of the total soluble



phosphorus that was bioavailable.






WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DESCRIPTIONS



Given below are general descriptions of the treatment methods



employed at the four wastewater plants which were studied
                                47

-------
intensively on-site during this investigation.  Included in the



descriptions are the approaches used for preliminary, primary,



secondary, and tertiary wastewater treatment, and sludge treat-



ment and disposal.






GATES-CHILI-OGDEN



At the Gates-Chili-Ogden facility, a 20 MGD plant located near



Rochester, NY, raw municipal wastewater was given preliminary



and primary treatment prior to biological treatment by a con-



ventional activated sludge process.  To remove phosphorus, alum



was added in liquid form to the effluent of the aeration basin,



upstream from the final clarifiers as illustrated in the process



schematic (Figure 2).  The secondary sludge, which consisted of



biological and aluminum-phosphorus solids, was partially



recycled to the aeration basin and partially wasted.  By recy-



cling alum with the return activated sludge, the contact period




between alum and phosphorus in the wastewater was increased,



which would permit kinetically-limited precipitation reactions



to approach equilibrium more closely than could occur without



alum recycle.  Waste secondary sludge was conditioned for



flotation thickening with a polymer and combined after thicken-



ing with primary sludge.  The combined sludges were dewatered by



vacuum filtration and incinerated or composted on-site.






FRANK VAN LARE



The Frank Van Lare wastewater treatment plant is located in



Rochester, NY.  It has an average daily flow of approximately



100 MGD.  During the monitoring studies, treatment consisted of
                                48

-------
o
UJ
IE
o
CO

CO
CO
UJ
o
o
o
o
                                                                                                 c
                                                                                                 OJ
                                                                                                -o
                                                                                                 0>
                                                                                                O
                                                                                                  I
                                                                                                o
                                                                                                  I
                                                                                                 to
                                                                                                 O)
u
4J
(O
                                                                                                 O>
                                                                                                oo
                                                                                                 cu
                                                                                                 u
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                 s-
                                                                                                CL.
                       o
                  W)   >
                  -^   o
                  o   p
                      a:
                 51
                 o
                 cr
                                               49

-------
two main streams, as shown in the process schematic (Figure 3).



Raw wastewater received preliminary screening and degritting and



was then split for primary sedimentation and further treatment.



To 20 percent of the total flow, liquid alum and a polymer were



added just upstream from the primary clarifiers to enhance phos-



phorus removal during primary sedimentation.  The remainder of



the flow was given primary treatment, without alum addition, and



biological treatment by conventional activated sludge.  The



clarified secondary effluent and alum-treated primary effluent




were combined for chlorination prior to discharge.  The primary



sludges from both treatment streams were combined with wasted



biological sludge for treatment by gravity thickening, vacuum



filtration, and incineration.






BIG SISTER CREEK



The Big Sister Creek wastewater treatment plant, a 3.1 MDG plant



located near Angola, NY, was upgraded in 1978 from a primary




treatment facility to a tertiary treatment system.  As shown  in



the process schematic for the Big Sister Creek plant  (Figure  4),



screened and degritted raw wastewater was sent without primary



sedimentation to an aeration basin for biological treatment by



an extended aeration activated sludge process.  Effluent from



the aeration basin is clarified by sedimentation and 70 percent



of this flow was dosed with ferric chloride and a polymer for



phosphorus removal in a solids contact clarifier.  Effluent from



the solids contact clarifier was applied to a sand filter, after



which the filtrate was chlorinated for discharge.  A portion  of
                                50

-------
o
LJ
8
tr
a.
cc
                                                                                                                 c
                                                                                                                 re
                                                                                                                 re

                                                                                                                u.

                                                                                                                 i-
                                                                                                                 o
 (J
•r-
•I-J


 
-------
o
g
X
o
If)
LJ
O
O
tr
a.
o
CD
                                                                                               O)
                                                                                               cu

                                                                                              o

                                                                                               s-
                                                                                               (U
                                                                                              -p
                                                                                               CO
                                                                                              co

                                                                                               S-
                                                                                               o
                                                                                               (O

                                                                                               (U
                                                                                              .c
                                                                                               o
                                                                                              CO

                                                                                               CO
                                                                                               to
                                                                                               a;
                                                                                               o
                                                                                               o

                                                                                              Q_
                                                                                               C7)
                                         52

-------
the iron-phosphorus sludge from the solids contact clarifier was



recycled back to the clarifier influent.  The sludge recycle



provides an increased contact period between iron and wastewater



phosphorus, which permits a closer approach to precipitation



equilibrium, than would occur in the absence of solids recycle.



Both secondary and iron-phosphorus sludges were thickened by



flotation and combined for storage in an aerobic digester.



Centrifugation and sand bed drying were employed for sludge de-



watering.  Dewatered sludge was trucked to an adjacent land fill



for disposal.






ELY




As illustrated in the process schematic for the Ely, MN waste-



water treatment plant (Figure 5), screened and degritted raw



wastewater was given primary settling before biological treat-



ment, which consisted of a single-stage trickling filter.



Liquid alum and a polymer were added to the trickling filter



effluent to enhance phosphorus removal during secondary



clarification.  All biological solids and alum-phosphate sludge



which collected in the final clarifiers were recycled to the



influent of the primary sedimentation tanks, which served to



increase the time of contact between the alum, wastewater solids,



and phosphorus.  The secondary effluent was chlorinated, held



briefly in non-functional solids contact tanks, and passed



through a dual media filter prior to discharge from the plant.



Sludge from the primary clarifier was thickened by gravity and



conditioned with lime prior to vacuum filtration.  A landfill
                                53

-------
o

I

UJ
I
o
UJ
o
o

£



UJ
 (O


Q.
                                                                                       1-
                                                                                       o
                                                                                       4-
 (O


 (U


 o
oo


 00
 (/>
 0)
 o
 o


Q.
                                                                                      IT)



                                                                                       O)


                                                                                       3
                                              54

-------
was used for disposal of the vacuum filter cake.






SURVEY RESULTS



The distribution of municipal treatment plants in the lower



Great Lakes basins by state and Canadian province is presented




in Table 2.  Note that for the Lake Ontario basin the distribu-



tion of plants is relatively equal between U.S. and Canada;



however, 77 percent of the Lake Erie basin plants are located in



the U.S.  These 229 plants range in annual phosphorus discharge




from 0.6 to 2000 metric tons/yr, with effluent total phosphorus



concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 17.5 mgP/L.






PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL APPROACHES



Based on the results of the questionnaire, an estimate of the



relative distribution of treatment approaches for phosphorus



removal at wastewater plants in the lower Great Lakes vicinity




can be made.  Of the 154 plants responding to the questionnaire,



104 indicated that phosphorus removal was being practiced while



30 were not practicing phosphorus removal.  An additional 20



plants were eliminated from those who responded since they were



later determined to be located outside the lower lakes basins or



abandoned.  Thus, from the questionnaire responses approximately



80 percent of the plants in the survey practiced phosphorus



removal.






A summary of the major chemicals used for phosphorus removal and



their point of addition in the treatment process (i.e. primary,



secondary or tertiary) is shown in Table 3.  Of the 104 plants
                               55

-------
TABLE 2.   NUMBER OF PLANTS  IN  SURVEY

Lake Ontario
New York
Ontario
Lake Erie
New York
Pennsylvania
Indiana
Michigan
Ohio
Ontario
48
43
91
10
1
3
23
69
32
138
U.S. 48
Canada 43
U.S. 106
Canada 32




                       Totals:   U.S.
154
                                Canada    75
                                        229
                    56

-------
practicing phosphorus removal, 53 used an iron salt  (one more



than shown in Table 6 as one respondent listed iron but did not



specify where), 49 used an aluminum salt, and only two used



lime.  One plant used both iron and alum.  The frequency of use



of the precipitation cations  (aluminum or iron) is compared by



country in Table 4.  In comparison, Fe or Al are used with about



the same frequency.  Lime is now seldom used, based on our



survey.






In regard to the point in the treatment scheme where the majority




of phosphorus removal takes place, the data are summarized in



Table 5.  At this point in time a relatively small percentage of



the plants are actually using a tertiary process to accomplish



phosphorus removal.  A summary of the data suggests that



approaches for phosphorus removal include aluminum addition to



the secondary process, iron addition to primary, and iron addi-



tion to the secondary process, in order of decreasing frequency



of use.






PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS



In spite of the fact that very few truly tertiary processes are



employed in the lower lakes area, those plants practicing phos-



phorus removal appear to be consistently achieving a 1.0 mgP/L



effluent total phosphorus goal.  A frequency distribution,



developed for 30-day average effluent phosphorus concentrations,



is presented in Figure 6.  Note that more plants (112)  are



achieving a 1.0 mgP/L standard than the number which indicated




that they were practicing phosphorus removal (104).  Of the
                                57

-------
               TABLE  3   TREATMENT  APPROACHES  BY  CHEMICAL
                         (PRECIPITATION  CATION) AND  LOCATION

Number of Plants

Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Total

Al
1
26
2
29
U.S
Fe
16
6
2
24
Canada
Total
17
32
4
53
Al
2
17
1
20
Fe
20
8
0
28
Total
22
25
1
48
Al
3
43
3
49
Total
Fe
36
14
2
52
Total
39
57
5
101

          TABLE 4.  FREQUENCY OF PRECIPITATION CATION USAGE


Metal
Al
Fe
Lime

U.S.
54
44
2
Percent
Canada
41
57
2

Total
48
50
2

    TABLE 5.  SUMMARY OF LOCATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL TREATMENT
              IN THE TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS
Process
Location
U.S.
Percent
   Canada
Total
Primary

Secondary

Tertiary
 32

 60

  8
     46

     52

      2
 39

 56

  5
                                     58

-------
CO
1
r.
!§
CO
D
CO
ID


:c/:
<-
CO
D
.! "
c
c
s
C CO
<5 D
s w
<5 =>
§ w
0 ^
c
o
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 °
CO
ID
8O OOOOOO OoO
_CD ojN-cDin^ro c\j —
0-<. 0.5-< I.O-< l.5-< 20-< Z5-< 3.0-< 3.5-< 4.0- < 4.5-< 5.0 -< 5.5-< > 6.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0
EFFLUENT PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION (mg/L as total P)
                                                                      to
                                                                      c
                                                                      o

                                                                      4->
                                                                      to
                                                                      S-
                                                                      +->
                                                                      c
                                                                      0)
                                                                      o
                                                                      c
                                                                      o
                                                                      o

                                                                      1/1
                                                                      3
                                                                      S_
                                                                      O
                                                                      _c
                                                                      Q.
                                                                      1/1
                                                                      O
                                                                      .C
                                                                      Q-

                                                                      +J
                                                                      C
                                                                      O)
                                                                      3

                                                                      t|-
                                                                      4-
                                                                      UJ

                                                                      4-
                                                                      O


                                                                      fO
                                                                      s-
                                                                      cr>
                                                                      O
                                                                      +J
                                                                      to
                                                                      ID

                                                                       O)

                                                                       3
                                                                       en
SlNVHd !N3lMlV3dl JO

-------
plants for which effluent P data were available, 9 percent have



an effluent total phosphorus concentration £0.5 mgP/L and 52



percent are discharging £ 1.0 mgP/L.  These accomplishments are



summarized by plant size and basin in Table 6.






Whether required or not, there are 19 plants in the basins



currently meeting a 0.5 mgP/L standard.  We received a



questionnaire response, and therefore have treatment approach



information, on 14 of these 19 plants.  It is especially




interesting to note that only 2 of the 14 plants are currently



employing any tertiary treatment processes.  Seven of the plants



use Fed   (some also use a polymer) or pickle liquor at some



point in the treatment process; three of the plants use alum; and



three plants claim to achieve 0.5 mgP/L with no chemical addition



simply because the influent phosphorus is so low  (1-2 mgP/L).






In order to get some feel for what percentage removals are



currently needed to meet today's effluent phosphorus standards,



a frequency distribution of removal percentage was prepared from



our questionnaire data  (Figure 7).  It should be pointed out



that only 117 plants made up the sample for this distribution,



since both influent and effluent data were necessary to compile



removal percentages.  Recall that approximately 80 percent of



the respondents to the survey were practicing phosphorus removal,



yet only 63 percent of those reporting influent and effluent



phosphorus levels were achieving 80 percent removal of total



phosphorus through the plant.  Virtually all  (96 percent) of the
                                60

-------
       TABLE  6.   DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS BY SIZE AND BASIN REACHING
                  1.0 and 0.5 mg P/L TOTAL PHOSPHORUS EFFLUENT
                  CONCENTRATIONS

Plant Size No. of Plants
(mgd)* in Size Range**

<1 12
1-<10 94
10-<50 18
50-<100 5
>100 2
Total 131

1 5
1-<10 60
10-<50 11
50-<100 4
>100 3
Total 83
Plants Meetino
1.0 mg P/L Standard
Lake Erie
6
47
14
1
1
69
Lake Ontario
3
29
8
1
2
43
Plants Meeting
0.5 mg P/L Standard

0
8
3
0
0
IT

2
5
1
0
0
8

*  1.0 mgd = 3,785 m3/d

** Phosphorus effluent data were not available for 7  plants  in  the  Erie
   basin and 8 plants in the Ontario basin
                                      61

-------
                                                   o
                                                   §
                                                   o
                                                  CO
                            a
                           •a
                            o
                                          CO
                                                             I
                                                    CO
                                                    :D
                                                                      CO
                                                                   CO
                                                                         CO
                                                                          CO
                                                                          •D
o
in
            O
            ro
                                                                        CO
                                                                        •3
                                                            O
                                                                                I


                                                                               o
                                                                               O
                                                           &
                                                                  cr

                                                                  h-

                                                                  LJ
                                                                  CJ
                                                                  o:
                                                                  UJ
                                                                  a.
                                                                              c\J
                                                                                            in
                                                                                            QJ
                                                                          c
                                                                          QJ
                                                                          O
                                                                          s_
                                                                          0)
                                                                         a.
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            ai
                                                                                            OL
S-
o
-C
Q.
I/I
O
                                                                                             m
                                                                                             01
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             (II

                                                                                             3
SlNVId
                                             JO
                                             62

-------
plants which reported removal of 80 percent or more were using



iron or aluminum for precipitation during treatment.  Conversely,



only 68 percent of all the plants which employed chemicals for



phsophorus removal were achieving removal of 80 percent or



better.






The above data suggest two possibilities: either the treatment



plants do not generally have to remove 80 percent of the phos-



phorus to meet 1.0 mgP/L effluent concentration, or there is




room for improvement in many plants as far as phosphorus removal



efficiency is concerned.  For two reasons it seems likely that



the latter case is most prevalent.  First, 47 percent of the



lower lakes plants are failing to meet a 1.0 mgP/L standard.



Also, according to our questionnaire the mean influent phos-



phorus concentration to plants in the lower lakes is 6.3 mgP/L.



This means that on the average 84 percent TP reduction through



plant would be necessary to achieve a 1.0 mgP/L effluent standard



and 92 percent TP reduction would be necessary to achieve a 0.5



mgP/L effluent concentration.






FIELD MONITORING RESULTS



OVERALL TREATMENT PERFORMANCE



In order to evaluate the performance of the four intensively



monitored plants with respect to phosphorus removal, it was



deemed necessary to also monitor the plant performance with



respect to the more conventional wastewater parameters.  A



summary of the overall performance data during the monitoring



period for each plant is presented in Table 7.
                               63

-------

















GO
}_
"^
^




































*
•K '-"*»
Z _J
"^v.
r— ^**"
ro CT
•>-> E
0 - —
r-

**™X
t
;y -x^
^^ 7^
* 1— en
1/1 E
i-


_J
1—

UJ
*f
(—


^£
UJ
a:
f~~
GJ

O
*^— *



rO |
a. i
\r\
CJ *-~-
Or— _J
C ro ^
ro -U CT
EC E
i_i j ^_ p^— ""fc^"
h- i 0
CO 14-
 """""^
o



C" 1
O.CO ^-
E'CO CT
1 ! _^_> ^
O ,' i ro 	

GJ

UJ S-
0 I—
zj 1

IE;
i











to
*•»•*
CSJ
•
LO
—
CO

^^
CM

CM
r—
*^— -
LO
•
1—
— '
co
•
ViO



X^^k
C\J
^_>

C ro
1—



c
o
"O
CD
O •*->
ro O 1C
O -r- O
r- in
C C. , <1> 2
O E W ro
i— fO i ra CC.
Q. CO O











to CM to
• **— ^ •
CTi LO f>-
CM • CM
i ro i
CM -r, f-»
• CM •
tO • CM
r- LO CM
	 CM 	


*~s ^"^
tO ^"^* r—
• ro •
CO — * LO
1 O 1
CO -' O
. LO •
ro • LO
**~^ LO ^~~*




^-^.
LO
CTt ^™^^™^
CM ro to
1 > 	 •!-•*
CM CO 1
r— — n"
r— CTi tO
— to —


*^^^-^^-^.
CM ro CT
ro - — r—
LO r^ ro
i ro i
CO - CC
r^* o ^~
CM CT CM
	 CM 	
_
LO
CTI
^~
1 1 1
o
r--
t—
°*~*



-!->
C
o
3
^~
4-
14-
UJ

>fc
i.
ro
E

n
a.













^— -X
CT
CO •
• LO
i — 1
- r~-
0 •

«>t C-co

CM
r— ^-"^
^ - ^"
CO •
• f—
O I
-r CO
CO •
• O CO
O— 'CO






*— »,
CM 	 •
>— ro
"•— ' r-*
ro i
-*• r**' ^*
cr> ^-^cn


x->.
Csj -^"^
r— CO
~— o
CC r—
i — 1
— c^J-
C ro r^
LO 	 	 CC


^ — *.. — ^
ro r--
NX.^ r—*
i — 1
- LO
tO r~~ f~~
, 	 CT

^•^
4-J ^~*
C i —
O ro
3 $-
r— CU
4— ^
*»- O
UJ - —

^x r—
S_ ro
fO >
-o o
c E
0 O
(J CC.
a
CO t£











LO LO
^— ' •
ro h*»
• CM
^~ i
T; CT
o •
• l,jO
O r—
CM *~-*

O
r^ "^^**
— 'O^
CO •
• (.jQ
1— 1
- CO
CO •
• CM
CO s-— "


*^"^
o
^— ^**^,
— -o
CM r--.
0 ^J-
i — 1
— . r>x.
tO CM
CO r—
^— v^^»
*^~^
o

• 	 LO
I — ro
t— r^»
i — i
— pvx
CO ro
*r ro
^}-v_x
"o —
1— LO
	 	 CT,
CM CM
LO 1
-. CT,
CM «3-
1— r«*
CM • — •






Q
i- 4~)
ro C
_l 0
3
C i—
ro  C
t—t
tS
C 3
fO ro
i» CC.
u.











LO O
^*^ •
ro LO
• ^-«
i — i
— r—
CTi •
• CM
ro i— c
i 	 CO

o
r— *~*+
"— •* ^D
^J* *
• CXJ
O 1
- CO
CO •
• C5 ^O
r— ^—— * t^




x^-*»*^-«*
O kO
r^ r^-*
*>— -" 1
<- o
f— *
- CM
ro ro CM
LO — r^

^***
o *— »

	 CO
r~- CM
ro i
- CT
cc r>-
ro r— r^«
CM — <=r
o''—
r— 1C
	 CT
P-. i —
CM 1
- ro
•— O
LO i— CT
i — 	 CM



^•^
H
3
4-> i —
C c£
O 	
3
^— r—
Cf_ f^
14- >
LiJ O
?^
E C
3 DC

^c ^^













LO • — ^
**— + Vj0
ro •
• r**N
CSJ I
— , ^~
^- •
• CM CO CO


o
^~ ^"**k
*— ' f—
CT •
• ro
O 1
- LO
LO •
• O O i—
i — ' — tO tO




^-— s
o *—•»
t— CT

CM i—
ro i
— r*-*
ro i— CM CM
t_o **— ' ^^ r^*-


* — *,
CO ^"^
^— t***
*»_^ ^~
CM r —
ro i
- CT
cc <• 0 <3-
co — -co r-
_
O

•*~* 4~~*.
CT LO
r— tO
— 1
O CTi tO ^J"
CO • — 'CC 1 —
+-> 'ro--^
C O r—
G; ••- >—
3 CT ro
r- 0 i-
4- ,— CJ
>4- C >
LiJ -i- O
co —
r— *— •-
0 r—
U i— ro
•r— ro >
CT > O
0 C E
r— E O
c o or
•r- CC.
CO ^-£
**
to --~ • — »
• — to to

CO LO
O 1 • 1 • 1
i— r— ro
•4-1 —i — ;
^^- r^ o°^
• • •
?— ^* ro to
ro ,— r- LO
^ — ^ CTi ' — * ' — ^
r^x, • to '^^ 1.0 ^"^
• ^J- *~~* r— "~-^ LO
O ^3" r— • r— •
r— 1 • r— • O
-r, CO O 1 O 1
r-~ • — co — ^f
• t— CT • *r •
r— CM • O • C CT
ro • — o *-'O — * CTI

ro CM co ro
r~ • r— ^*™^ ^— *-~^
•«*— ^ CO ^~^ ^O *— ^ r^
ro r— CM -r— •
• 1 -CM • r—
CM r— O 1 O 1
T, O -' CC - J —
co • ro • CT •
• ^J" • r™ • CO tO
to — CM — -o - — co


^•^N
ro
f— s— x.
— -0
to r^ *•-""* ^~^
LO to ro --^ ro
i— 1 r— CM t— -— ~
4-' r— •>H^ f— > 	 * ^f
^3- f— CM 1 i — 1
tO i — — LO — i— CT
CM 	 CC — -CM — -CT,
^— *.
ro --^
i— CM
*— ^ to '-"^ *-"*»
LO o ro • — «ro ^~-
F— r— r- CC r- CC
CM i — ' LO — ro
- CC CT 1 tO 1
to cv - CO - r-»
•C- CM to CM CT. r— ro
^"•"^."-CV^CT
_
*—** co
CSJ CO
^— •* r— *•"** ^~*>
*f 1 CSJ '-^CSJ
— r^*. "^— -* ^j~ *»— •"
O CM O i O —
ro r— - ro - CM CO
i 	 ^ 	 -CM 	 CTi
_^^_
•4-J r—
C 4J r-
OJ C ro
^. 3 O t-
O ^~ 3 O
Cl 4- ,— >
t. *J w- u- o
O C UJ U_ « 	
o uj
S- 3 >, r-
C i— S- -O ro
•»-> «*- ro G >
1/1 C T3 1- O
•r- i— t C Ci ^~
CO O •«-> O
S (J i — DC
CT ro O —
•r- CC. CO U_ S~£
CC
"O
CD
3
C
• r—
+->
a
o
o
«te^











































































64

-------


































- — •
-o1

3
C
•r-
4.)
C
o
-21
r-.

LiJ
CO
^c
h-









































































































































*
to
s-
QJ
4_>
OJ
E
ro
S_
(O
0.

QJ
o
J2
(O
E

0
4-
O
Q_


O
ro
O
^-
"""







































*
Z _J

•— Z
fo cn
•u E
O — -
1—





.*•— >
_J
z --.
^i Z
H" O^
E
«*w^








ex
,*—"•*
— _J

4-> CT>
0 ^E_






x—^
_J
oo ^
00 01



X— N
_J

0 "^J
o o
O O>
E
**— -





*~*
I
LO """^
O CM
0 0
22 cn

*^^



l/l
C
O
•r—
"O •*->
C TS
rO O
O
CD —I
E
ro CT>
z c
•^
4-? ^~
C 0.
ro E
r™" ^3
D. OO
LO LO LO
^r LO i —
• 1 • 1 • 1
CO O r—
-r! -i -S
r^ O P*^
• • •
CTi LO CO CO
r- .— r— CM


LO co LO cn '-~-CM
•— . 	 	 • LO •
*5- CM LO «a 	 co
• CO • r— O r-
CO 1 O 1 • 1
- CM -' O - CTi
O • U3 • O •
• o • ^- • o
cn i —  CO LO r— CM
i 	 	 CO 	 -i 	 CTl


^
C -4-> r^
QJ C ro
3 QJ S-
t— 3 QJ
4- i— >
•4-) 4— 4— C^
C UJ 4- 	
QJ LU
3 >, r-

4- ro O >
c -o s- o
—• C Q) E
O *-> O
X o r- a:
>, ro 0 -r-
i— cc: oo u. t<
LU
























































































*••—•.
-o
QJ
>
5-
QJ
to
o

to
a
3
r—
rO
>

4—
o

QJ
CTl
C
ro
S-
**—*

^-^
to
QJ
r—
CL
E
ro

4-
O

S-
a
^
3
C
" —
C
o
•r—
4_)
fO
•^
>
0 '—
"O ^^
1
-0 CM
s- o
ro Z
"O •> — '
C.
ro +
+J
l/l **-^
- Z
co
c o
ro Z
0 	
E
*—
rs Z
•4-^ ^^
rO ^"~
"^ "**-^

4- i:
0
^y
4->
ro r—
£~ ro
•*->
C O
U_ 1—

•JC -j£
*
65

-------
The G-C-0, Big Sister Creek and Ely plants were all performing



quite well with respect to secondary treatment.  On the order of



90 percent or greater removal of BOD^ and suspended solids was



being accomplished during the monitoring periods.  In these



plants, therefore, adequate phosphorus removal was not being



hampered by an inefficient secondary treatment system.






On the other hand, the Frank Van Lare plant, during our monitor-



ing period, was less efficient than the other plants at removing




conventional wastewater pollutants.  The biological treatment



stream was adequately removing BOD-; however, the effluent



suspended solids from the final clarifiers was erratic and



averaged 53 mg/£ during the two-week monitoring.  It should be



pointed out that one of the final clarifiers and several primary



sedimentation tanks were out of service at this time.  As a



result, the suspended solids removal facilities in the biological



treatment stream were often overloaded.  Phosphorus removal on



this portion of the flow was as good as could be expected under



the circumstances.






As might be expected, the BODj. removal was not good in the 20



percent of the flow receiving only the alum-enhanced primary



sedimentation.  The suspended solids removal in this process was



slightly better than might be anticipated in a conventional



primary sedimentation process, no doubt due to the use of alum



in the system.  However, it will become evident in later



discussions that solids separation problems were the cause of



lower total phosphorus removal efficiencies at the Van Lare plant,
                                66

-------
PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PERFORMANCE



Presented in Table 8 is a summary of data collected on phos-



phorus during the field monitoring studies.  These data are



listed by plant and sampling location within each plant and



include the average values of total phosphorus as well as several



fractions of the total phosphorus in the wastewater.





Gates-Chili-Ogden



At the Gates-Chili-Ogden plant, the addition of alum to the



aeration tank effluent resulted in an excellent reduction of all



fractions of phosphorus analyzed  (Figure 8).  Soluble phosphorus



removal or conversion to particulate P was slightly more



efficient than particulate phosphorus removal, thus causing a



decrease in the relative total soluble P from 62 percent of the



total P in the raw influent to 45 percent of the total P in the



secondary effluent.  As shown in Table 8, only a slight



reduction in particulate phosphorus (about 30 percent) occurred



during primary treatment, and virtually no change in soluble



phosphorus took place.





It was also noted that the relative contribution of the NaOH-



extractable phosphorus (EXP) to the total particulate P increased



through the plant.  Particulate phosphorus which is formed during



alum precipitation would be likely to contribute directly to the



NaOH-extractable fraction, which probably explains the observa-



tion.
                               67

-------




















_J

o
s:
UI
ry
OO
Q h-
Z. 2
^f, *-£
_J
00 O-
z.
o o:
t— i UI
h- 1—
0 <
C£ UI
U. 1—
oo
OO eC
ID 3
ct:
O OL
T" ""^
Q- O
OO U.
o
a: n:
Q- C3
U. O
O f"
2 1—
O
M 00
1— UI
 c_>
2 IV
O UI
CJ Q-

,
CD

UI
__!
CO
«=C



















































































































*
*
_J

a.

en
E

C
o
•r~
4->
re
s-
4_>
C
cu
o
c
o
o

00
s-
o
f
Q.
CO
o
c~
a.































CO
c
0

1 '
u
re
i.
\ i
LL.
(/)
3

0

Q.
00
O
JC
a.





























































^->,
a.
00
eu
!o
3
r—
O
OO













,^-x
Q-
D-
•*-**

CU
•M
re
3
u
• r—
4J
s-
re
a.















































a.
a:
00







a.
00

r—
re
4_)
O
1—


Q.
d.
|
T~
0
re


r~-
re

o
I—




a.
a.

,_
n3
.{_}
o
(—






OIOIOI OIOI Ol OIOIOI C
+1 O +1 CM +1 O +1 CO +1 O +1 i— +1 ID +1 CM +1 VO O
 ^-^ ^~* 	 , 	 , . 	 ^ ^-^ ^~, 	 ,
vo CO ^d" i — t-^ co r-^- co o>
CO ^" VO CM O r^» ID O ID r— VO VO CM CM ^f* ID CO r—
r— • CO • CM • ^- • O • CM- ID • CM • O •
• VO • *?J" • O • CM • O • O • CO • CM • O
r— IOIOI OIOI Ol OIOIOI
+i vo +i o 4-1 ^ +i CM +i co -HI en -H co +i ID +i co
en ^j1 CD vo ^j* f™ * *^t~ *v}~ r~~ CD ^t~ CD ID ^* co r^» vo r~*
CO'O'CO- r— • f— • CO- r— -i — • r- •
-CM 'CO -Or— -O-OO-OO«3- • I— • r— • O
co^-"^- — '0s — ' en r— - — o* — cno- — r~~ i^ CM- — CM- — ^o- — '



*~~* ^~^ ^~^ *^"^ *»—^ ^— ^ ^~^ *~~*
CM r— COVOVO «d-<*CO
IDO O«D VO r— r— ID Cno COCOCM1DCM
ID • ^— • ID • co • ID • • o - en •
• co • CD • co - 1~~ • CM r-* r-^ • CD - CD
OlllOI OIOI Ol CO 1 O 1 O 1
+1 CM +1 CM +1 ^J- +1 ID +1 O +1 CO +1 r— +1 CM
ocn C^CM (^."3-voiQ oco i — CM ID i— co • —
r-* • co • co - en - en • r--* • »— • • — •
' o -oco • i— • o en • o CM r- • r— • o • o
i — -— ' O * — ^ f^- r— **-^ O - — ^ <5j* O ' — ^ ID ID CO - — ^ O * — ' O - — ^


*-^
*~^ ^~^ ^~^ *^"^» ^-^ t^~^ «^- *-— ^ ^— ^
VO VO UD IDVOOO OOLDCO
CM vo co ID ID r--» ^- r"~ vo r^^ oo r*** c^ •  • o • r— • GO-CO- r*» • t--. r— o • o •
• CO • i— • O • *J- • r— -CM • r— • O • O
OIOIOI OIOI Ol CMIOIOI
+i oo +i t-» +i •— +i co +i en +i r-< +i •— +i CM +i «*•
l--.OCM«^-CMCM COIDVOID >*CO OCOI^-i — Cni —
i — • ID • ^* - CM • O • t— • *3~ - i — - r— •
• r— -r— -Or— -r— -O«3" -OOr— -r— -O -O
CM — 'c — 	 O- — CO CM-— 'i — 	 ID i — 	 LO ID ^ - — O 	 O' — '

	 .
*sj* 00 ^O G3 vj v,O f**^ LO O^
c^p ^Q kO CD ^J" fO 00 ^^ ^^ i 3 c^p *ij • Lf^ ^O CO CO
ID • ID • CO • r— -CO- CO- CO i— CM • O •
• co-vo-i— -vO'CM cnco • r— • CM • o
r— IOIOI i — IOI -1 CMIOIOI
+i CM +i oo +i CM +i ID +i en o en +i oo +i co +i CM
coooi^-eniDco • — ooi — r-- +i«st- •— en CM co ID co
CM - cj* • r-* - CO - CO • CM • CO • t^* • CO •
•CO ••=!• -OOO -CM -OVOIDOOr— -CO -i — -O
VO' 	 ^ID 	 O^-'OO CO- — ^i 	 VO i 	 VO VO VO 	 CM 	 O 	


^ o —
CM i — •— ~ CO
	 	 to - —
co — - 4-> a — .
— — "^ 4-) ^~ **~^ C *r~ r— | ^ ^-^
• — • C i — ' — - O CU CDr— ^— ~ C ^}-
c CM 4-> cu re o i— *-* 3 o re co cu —
CU r- C 3 S- r--— El— r— S-_*r— 3
T5 - — CU r— CU 	 3 <+- O CU CU 	 r— 4->
cn 3<+->cu 4-> t— «f- -r- > eu <+-o
O4-> i— 4- O S-4-> C 
•r-CUf- _JOJ3i— CU C
r— 3 UI >,!— 3 r— i— re i — i— S-3 >, O
•1-1 — i- re EI — Oi_ reo rere cui — s-o
_g* V^ ^^ fQ 5* fO H— H~ ^ *r~ ^ ^ 4-) l^— re
OC S- XJ O >C UI OCT> OO OOC -O 00
1 1-1 ro C E H-I EOEE-r-i-iC-O
00 EOCUJii E CU •— CU CU OO O->-
CU ^ 'r— VJ C£ £1 ^ 3 fV O i*v CcC 2 O i~~
4->res-eu rerei — T- cnrecuo
recg D_ OO &5 S-Di <=C S^CQ &5&5 -i— O£ OO OO
o u. oa
68

-------

































*•"-*»
TD
CU
3
C
•r-
<4_>
C
o
u
x^ •-

'1 .
00

LU
_J
CO
^
r-




















































































































































*
•jc
-J
•*x^
Q.

Ol
E

C
o
•r"
4J
ro
5-
4_J
C
CU
u
c
o
cj

10
3
St.
o
.c
a.
to
o
.c
a.



































to
c
o
•r"
4_>
CJ
fO
S.

IO
3
i.
0

a.
(/)
o
c**
a.






















"— >
a.
oo
• —
QJ
1 '
.a
3
r—
0
00










Q_
or
oo







Q.
00

1—"
rO

O
h-









•"-•x
a.
a.
"x—*


fQ
r—
r>
u
•r*
4_)
s_
rO
Q.




a.
a.
i
Tt
O
ro


r— •
ro
4^
O
1—





0-
a.

1—
ro

O
I—








a.

^—
rO
4->
0
1—








*
to
c
o
•r™
"O •(->
C rO
(O O
O
CU _l
E
fO O")
z c
•r~
•4-J r—
C Q.
rO E
i— ro
CL CO
CM i— CM CO
^" CTi 00 t-O r~~ r"~i i— c^
r— • CO • O • O •
• O • r— • O • O
O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
+1 O +1 O +1 O +1 O
If) If) CTiCOi — Oi — O
r^» • CT* • r"7* • r"^ •
• O «3" 00 • O • O • O Ol
o — CTI «3- o — o — 'O — 'cn


*•— x ^~^ ^-^» ^^
f~- CM ID CTi
CMO «d- r^» i— O CM O
r~~ • vO • C3 • r""* •
• i— • CM . o • O
O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
+i m +i r^ +i CM +i CM

00 • «cf • O • O •
• o co o\ • o • o • o r--
O "* — CTv LO r— **-^ O *—^ C^ s — ' CT>



^~"^ ^^N ^-^^ X™*%
co vD «^- LO
CO r™ ^^ LO iQ CT^ Ps» t*^
O • CTi • CO • i — •
• O • ^J* • r— • O
O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
+1 CM +1 VO +1 VO +1 LO
u">o cMcnooor-x.CM
O • 00 • «3- • «d- •
• OLncn -o *o •o<«i-
O 	 CT> CTl r— • 	 i 	 'O- — r-x




^~** *—** ^"^ x"-x
CO 00 O CO
^" r— LO r^x r— CO f^- f*^-
O' CO • ^1" • i — •
• O • sj- • CM • O
O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
+1 CM +1 CM +1 CO +1 O
i(*i r~^ f\j (_f^ f\j rj> CT* CO
f~l • ^- • t^ • ^^ •
•OUDCTl «i — «O «OO
O — 'CTl CTl CM 	 ^i — 	 O 	 CO




* 	 X * 	 X ^~x ^~*.
CM f^ LO CM
^" ^~ CTl CTl LO LO CTl CTt
r~ • CM • *xt* " t~~ *
• i — • VO • CM • O
O 1 r- 1 O 1 O 1
+1 00 +1 O +1 CM +1 «*
**d~ ^D r-** c\j c\j ^3 vo co
o^ • r*** • r^* • LO *
• O LO UD • CVJ • i— • O LT)
O*— 'CT) CO OO^-'i 	 ^O^-^CO
<^~%
4.)
o
rO

CO C CM
i— 0 i—
i— 4J r—
4-> l/l i — C 4-> i —
C "D ra •— » Ol c (O
QJ T- S- CM 3 QJ S-
3 r— QJ 	 r- 3 CU
i— O > 4- r— >
4- OO O +•> 4- 4- O
<4_ 	 • C LU 4- 	
LU CU LU
•— r— 3 >» ^~
"O rO ra i — S- T3 ra
CU > > 4- ro OJ >
i- O a C T3 S- O
QJ E E >-• C (U E
4-> QJ QJ O 4-> QJ
r— o: a: s u i— a:
•r- >, (O QJ •1--
LL. s«^ i— D; oo u_ *?
LU





























































































































•
•o
CU
N C
>, _0

la 4J
C (0

-> ^f


'a. -a QJ
E s- to
ro 
o ro
E c i-
3 O 4J
C T- C
•(-> QJ
(0 ro U
QJ S- C
••- •»-> O
4- C U
•r- QJ
C 04-
0> CO
•r- O
to CJ QJ
CD
10 C C
QJ ra (O
to QJ J-
0) £•—
^
C
ro ro
S- 4->
ro rO
f~} '^|_j

C 4-
•p- O

t- 4-^
QJ ra
-a E
E s-
3 O
z u.

* *
*
69

-------
                     GATES-CHILI-OGDEN
    8
CO

§
E
CO
o
E
    o
         TP   TPP  EXP  TSP  SRP
           RAW INFLUENT
TP  TPP  EXP  TSP  SRP
   FINAL EFFLUENT
 Figure  8.   Mean Concentrations of Phosphorus and Phosphorus
            Fractions at  the Gates-Chili-Ogden Plant.  Error
            Bars Signify  + One Standard Deviation for the 12
            Samples Analyzed.
                          70

-------
Frank Van Lare



Reduction of total phosphorus at this plant was similar in both




the biological treatment stream  (60 percent) and the alum-



primary settling stream  (66 percent)  (Figure 9).  In both cases



soluble P reduction was sufficient, but particulate phosphorus



reduction was not effective enought to achieve a total P



standard of 1.0 mgP/L.  The phosphorus removal in the biological



stream was typical for this treatment scheme.  However,




relatively ineffective solids separation in the alum-primary



settling process accounted for a lower removal percentage than



might be expected.  This ineffective capture of aluminum-



phosphorus precipitation solids resulted in a relatively large



fraction of the effluent particulate P from this process being



NaOH-extractable (91 percent).






Big Sister Creek



The performance of the Big Sister Creek plant for phosphorus



removal is illustrated in Figure 10.  Figure 10 shows a near 70



percent reduction in total raw wastewater phosphorus from



biological treatment alone, due almost exclusively to removal of



particulate phosphorus.  The effluent from the secondary



clarifier averaged 0.17 mgP/L of total particulate phosphorus,



compared with 4.40 mgP/L in the raw wastewater, while the total



soluble phosphorus concentration averaged 2.13 and 2.15 mgP/L on



samples taken from the two locations.  The unusually low




particulate P in the secondary clarifier effluent was the result



of excellent solids separation in this phase of treatment.
                               71

-------
   LJ
   QC
Z

cc
                                                                                     Q.
                                                                                     x  O-J
                                                                                     uJ  _JU_

                                                                                         oh
                                                                                     o_  — Lu
                                                                                     a.  CD
                                                                                       LJ


                                                                                       LL,
                                                                                                   O)
                                                                                                   S-
                                                                                                   fO
                                                                                                   c -o
                                                                                                   (O  N
                                                                                                      CO
                                                                                                   (O
                                                                                                   s-
                                                                                                 Ol  01
                                                                                                .C i—
                                                                                                -!->  Q.

                                                                                                4-i
                                                                                                 IO CO

                                                                                                  O

                                                                                                 O '"'
                                                                                                •r-  i-
                                                                                                -!->  O
                                                                                                 O >4-
                                                                                                 re
                                                                                                 i-  c
                                                                                                LU  O

                                                                                                 to -(->
                                                                                                 3  <0
                                                                                                 S- -r-
                                                                                                 O  >
                                                                                                -C  O)
                                                                                                 Q.Q
                                                                                                 to
                                                                                                 O T3
                                                                                                J=  S-
                                                                                                O.  (O
                                                                                                   T3
                                                                                                •o  c
                                                                                                 C  CO
                                                                                                   10
                                                                                                   ZJ O>
                                                                                                   s_ c
                                                                                                   o o
                                                                                                   I/)
                                                                                                   o >>
                                                                                                   J= 4-
                                                                                                   D- T-
                                                                                                      c
                                                                                                   4- Ol
                                                                                                   O T-
                                                                                                      00
                                                                                                   i/l
                                                                                                   C tO
                                                                                                   o $-
                                                                                                   •r- ro
                                                                                                   S_ S-
                                                                                                   4J O
                                                                                                   C S-
                                                                                                   01 S-
                                                                                                   <_) LU
                                                                                                   c
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                   o  •
                                                                                                      +j
                                                                                                   c c
                                                                                                   fO 
-------
Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1
»45 	
J? —
T
i
h(i
Ul
U .
O i
o: »
H
— m
f/J L^^M>
S2
m *-H
-h
H
T
H"1









i , „ , „ ... j

1 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 !
D CO  r—
CO Q.
•r- E
C/) n3
CD
••- n
CO r—
<1J  t.
S LJ-3! c c
Q [r— i o o
P: =Ju_ -«J -M
£ H-UJ n^.2
H- s_ >
> TP TPPEXPTSPSRP
SOLIDS
CONTACT
horus and Phosphorus F
nify +_ One Standard De
£ >- Q. 0>
Q, §Z: 000
t" c3ij-i Q. to
ft z=:l s-
uJ O— ' •*- "3
r QU_ 0 CQ
a. u) co
— O i-
•1- $-
4-> UJ
(0
E c -i->
^ 1— (DC
fts 2 O (O •
FllJ C r— T3

fi 13 0^ >!.
o. u- c 0) i—
= ZT 03 QJ 03
— • <1) S- C
^. i- <— ' «=l.
o
D 1
cr>
•i—
U-
73

-------
The data indicate that iron precipitation reduced the total



soluble phosphorus from 2.13 mgP/L in the secondary effluent to



0.16 mgP/L in the solids contact clarifier effluent.  Sand



filtration was really unnecessary for phosphorus removal at this



plant.  The increased concentration of phosphorus observed in



the filtered effluent, after iron precipitation, was due to



routing of a portion of the secondary effluent around the solids



contact clarifier for mixing with the iron treated effluent



downstream from the clarifier and application to the sand



filters.





ELY



Very good phosphorus removal was being accomplished at the Ely



plant  (Figure 11), with the filtered effluent very close to



meeting a 0.5 mgP/L standard.  The Ely plant has a permit



requiring a 0.4 mg/L total phosphorus effluent level.  Excellent



reduction of soluble phosphorus was accomplished by alum



addition to the trickling filter effluent; however, high



suspended solids in the secondary clarifier effluent was again



responsible for only a 33 percent reduction of particulate P to



that point.  Through the dual media filter, the extremely low



concentrations of soluble phosphorus did not change, while the



total particulate fraction was reduced to 20 percent of the raw



wastewater particulate phosphorus.





An examination of the distribution of fractions of total phos-



phorus through the plant shows the approach to treatment at Ely



favored removal of phosphorus from the soluble fraction to the
                                74

-------
                                                                 Jl
UJ
                                                   uj;
                                               I   UJ
                                               0   H:

                                                                      UJ
                                                                                C
                                                                                n3

                                                                                Q.
                                                                               UJ

                                                                                cu
                                                                                ns
                                                                                c
                                                                                o
                                                                                O
                                                                                ro
                                                                                S-
                                                                                o
                                                                               JZ
                                                                                Q.
                                                                                to
                                                                                O
                                                                               -a
                                                                                c
                                                                                03
                                                            3
                                                            S-
                                                            O

                                                            CL

                                                            O
                                                           _c:
                                                            CL
                        ro
                                                                 O
                                                                               in
                                                                               c
                                                                               o
                                                           rO

                                                           -4->
                                                           C
                                                           111
                                                           O
                                                           c
                                                           o
                                                           o

                                                           1=
                                                           rO
                                                           O>
                                                           
-------
extent that over 90 percent of the total phosphorus which



remained in the wastewater after alum treatment or filtration



occurred as particulate phosphorus (Table 8).  Additionally, the



NaOH extractable fraction of the total particulate phosphorus



was an increasingly predominant component of that fraction,



relative to the total phosphorus that remained in the wastewater



at the stages of treatment which were sampled.





PHOSPHORUS BIOAVAILABILITY RESULTS



Algal bioassays were conducted on 22 samples of wastewater, taken



from various locations in each of four wastewater treatment



plants, to determine the availability of phosphorus, both soluble



and particulate, to aquatic organisms; and, to determine the



extent of relationship, if any, between analytically-defined



chemical fractions and bioassay-defined available phosphorus.



The results of these experiments are presented in Figures 12



through 15 for each of the four plants in our field study.  A



comparison of available phosphorus fractions at the different



sampling points in each wastewater plant indicated that, at the



wastewater plants selected for study, the methods of treatment



had no major effect on the biologically available fraction of



either soluble or particulate phosphorus relative to the total



phosphorus content of those fractions (Table 9).  Thus, with the



exception of the Van Lare plant, reductions of available phos-



phorus fractions through the plants corresponded quite closely



with the reductions in the analytically-defined chemical



fractions.  Among the three plants behaving in this way, the
                                76

-------
       LJ
       _l
       CD
       <
       _J


       I
             UJ

             03
O
      H   D
UJ
Q
e>
o
 I

                                                                -(->
                                                                (O

                                                                OJ
                                                                4->
                                                                en
                                                                             1/1
                                                                             c
                                                                             O

                                                                             -p
                                                                             O
                                                                             (O
                                                                01
                                                                O

                                                                O.
                                                                10
                                                                O
                                                                             QJ
                                          
-------
<
cc
u_
                              vX-x-XvXvXv1' o.
                              v::::::::::x:x:x:x>: v-
                                        VM
Wastewater
                                                                                           (/>
                                                                                           rs
                                                                                           s_
                                                                                           o
                                                                                          .E
                                                                                           cx
                                                                                           1/1
                                                                                           o
                                                                                          jC
                                                                                          Q.

                                                                                          M-
                                                                                           O

                                                                                           CO
                                                                                           c
                                                                                           o

                                                                                          •4->
                                                                                           o
                                                                                           fO
                                                                                           s_
                                                                                          u.

                                                                                           O)

                                                                                          J2   •
                                                                                           rO -!->
                                                                                          i—  C
                                                                                          •r-  (13
                                                                                           (t3 r—
                                                                                           > D.
                                                                                          <
                                                                                            I  O>
                                                                                           C  S-
                                                                                           O  "3
                                                                                          •z. —i

                                                                                          -o  c
                                                                                           C  03
                                                                                           rO >

                                                                                           O) -^
                                                                                          r-  C
                                                                                          _Q  rt3
                                                                                           (O  S-
                                                                                          r— U_

                                                                                           rO  O)
                                                                                           > -C
                                                                                          < -t->

                                                                                           >> E
                                                                                          •—  O

                                                                                          la M-
                                                                                           o
                                                                                          •r—  t/1
                                                                                           cn o>
                                                                                           o t—
                                                                                          i—  Q-
                                                                                           O  E
                                                                                           •r-  rc
                                                                                           CQ C>O
3
                                                                                         OJ

                                                                                         3
                                                                                         O>
O
             O
             ro
O
cJ
                                                        o
              ") NOIlVaiN30NOO  SDdOHdSOHd
                                        78

-------
1
y
CD
UJ <
-J -J
< ^
_J ^
1 1
iiiii- HI



LJJ :.-..:. .....
UJ
tr
o
CO
00
S2
CO
.ii^*.

-p-


• ii . , TT,.-, 	 ,. , 	 -..i i i .ITT m »•,-.-,-.-— .-.--.-.r- :• :-.-.-.
I

I !•:-, ; . '

S?:.:*;:::
'," V. '.*•"•"
	 0

11. v-r-

ta

TPP TP TSP TPP TP TSP TPP
NT SECONDARY FILTERED
EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
AUGUST 10, 1979
of Phosphorus in Wastewater
^ — > c
,£ 3 §


1
Hisii*
«H
I



| 	 r-w.w.-rm:

•j»;»..*;«^>,«v«,'v^r*pv'»-w;*'»>";-»l", •.^*.*.*f^F*T*
....... ,....,. ........«,..,,...,rv^

IIIII
,
:z -H
TSP TPP TP TSP THP ' TP TSP TPP TP
NFLUENT SECONDARY FILTERED 1
EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
JULY 31 , 1979
14. Biologically Available and Non-Available Frac
Samples from the Big Sister Creek Plant.
Q.
£
] .1
DQOQQQQo L1-
•sj u) 10 <^- ro c\l —
NO!lVdlN30NOO  SndOHdSOHd
            79

-------
y I i
i,i 55 rr77"7"^'7'
LU <
_J _J t •:••••••:•;
m — r 1 > •"•' .-.•- ••
< ^ u— "--•
-i < f
< ^ :-
1 § i
»-| , •_« I -r"TV^ *"•;••"•*•
II LJ^^

:xx;:ix::;:;;j:v:
i^i
1 	 L^^ov^^-^;
vX-:-':':-':::-:':-'-.:.':>
n:::::::;:::;v:::::x..,;:x::x:;::x:
1 im^ti^^m-
jliMM^M/Mii
u
LJ
'••".'•'
r
L
H

x-ivx^':':'-:-.'--'-:-:-'
::x:.::;.o::x^:>:v
1
£':::':'x:::::X'::::x';:i;::!

B?i^%:!^i:




i i i
P TSP TPP TP TSP TPP
LIDS CONTACT EFFLUENT
JST 22, 1979
osphorus in Wastewater
^ % o £
2: < o
H H on
Z c
CL LU 0
W ID -r-
i- D -»->
u_ a
z «
a. i-i-
"- a,
!Q
fO
«3
>
1- f
°- S g
CO — > O
H- ZJ ^
fe 1
0; ^ «
£§S ll
g " «°-
£ 8 * ^^
•- oo . ^
0 fe -QJ
. (f) ;r
P: CD => «5
"- oo O o
I—) •<- in
< g1^
"^ r-- Q.
*- \- 0 E
Z ••- CO
Q. LU CO ^
W 13
h- -I
^ ir>
rf^ |—
' " e
rs
CT>
D O O O O O u-
rt ^ ro CM — '•
NOIiVdiN30NOO SOdOUdSOHd
         80

-------
      TABLE 9.   PERCENTAGES OF BIOLOGICALLY  AVAILABLE  PHOSPHORUS  AND
                 REDUCTION IN BIOLOGICALLY AVAILABLE  PHOSPHORUS  AT
                 MONITORED WASTEWATER PLANTS

Percent
Biologically Avai


Plant Name and
Sampling Location*
Gates-Chili-Ogden
Raw Influent (1)
Primary Effluent (1 )
Secondary Effluent (2)
Frank Van Care
Raw Influent (2)
Alum Effluent (2)
Biological Effluent (2)
Big Sister Creek
Raw Influent (2)
Secondary Effluent (2)
Filtered Effluent (2)
Ely
Raw Influent (2)
Secondary Effluent (2)
Filtered Effluent (2)


TBAP
TP

60
60
58

72
68
73

80
88
76

71
66
64
Phosphorus

BAPP
TPP

62
68
74

44
52
62

40
48
40

59
63
62
Table


BASP
TSP

59
57
40

88
86
82

94
91
79

82
92
86
Reduction
Available
Compared

TBAP

-
-
88

-
51
26

-
58
85

-
64
83
of Biologi
Phosphorus
to Raw Infl

cally

uent

BAPP BASP

-
-
79

-
12
38

-
90
96

-
21
62

-
-
94

-
59
41

-
53
83

-
92
96

* Number of samples assayed is  given  in  parentheses.
                                       81

-------
percentage removals of total phosphorus ranged from 85 to 88



percent (Table 8),  while total available phosphorus (BAP)



removal ranged from 83 to 88 percent (Table 9).






The results of these experiments could be summarized by noting



that biologically available phosphorus averaged 72 percent of



the total phosphorus.  the available particulate fraction



averaged 55 percent of the total particulate phosphorus, and the



available soluble fraction averaged 82 percent of the total




soluble phosphorus concentration in the wastewater samples.  It



should be noted that these fractions are based on relatively



short-term (approximately 2 weeks) incubations;  and, although



accumulation of phosphorus by the DCDA assay cultures was slow



towards the end of the incubation, a larger availability



likely would have been measured with longer-term incubations.






Attempts to correlate biologically available phosphorus with



various chemically-defined measures in the 22 samples assayed



yielded several quite good correlations.  Among the best was



simply a correlation between total phosphorus and total bio-



available phosphorus.  This correlation is illustrated in Figure



16.  The fact that the slope of the line in Figure 16 is



identical to the average BAP/TP ratio for all the samples



reflects the narrow range of values for that proportion among



the treatment plants as well as between sampling locations with-



in a plant.
                                82

-------
ro
O
O

Oco
4- <£>

£S

£-
6
ii
Q.

CO
              UJ
              Q   *
              O UJ UJ
              o a: uj
                  cc
                  o

                  cc
              O U_ CO UJ

              
-------
COSTS FOR PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL



The proper evaluation of a given phosphorus effuent standard



requires the costs incurred as well as the benefits obtained.



As was stated previously, one of the goals of this study was to



analyze the costs incurred at the four selected treatment plants



associated with phosphorus removal.  A summary of these costs is



presented in Table 10, comparing these costs to the total



operation and maintenance costs  (O&M) at each of the four plants.



The data indicate a wide variation in both total and phosphorus




associated O&M costs for the four plants.  On a $/1000 gallons



basis, the two plants with tertiary treatment had much higher



costs for phosphorus removal.  The ratio of associated phos-



phorus removal costs to total O&M costs also varied widely



among the four plants.






A more detailed breakdown of the various fractions of the O&M



costs associated with phosphorus removal is presented in Table



11.  In general the most sensitive item was chemical costs.



Labor and power costs were more significant at the plants with



tertiary treatment (Ely and Big Sister Creek) than those with



only secondary treatment (GCO and Van Lare).  Sludge costs were



in general substantial but it should be pointed out that the



sludge production associate'd with phosphorus removal is generally



only a small fraction of the total sludge generated at these



treatment plants.  This is shown in Table 12.  It should be



pointed out, however, that the sludge generated from phosphorus



removal is more difficult to handle and process than typical
                               84

-------
                 TABLE 10.   TOTAL O&M COSTS AND O&M COSTS ASSOCIATED
                            WITH PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL AT FOUR
                            MONITORED TREATMENT PLANTS

Treatment
Gates-Chil
El/
Big Sister
Frank Van
Plant
2
i-Ogden

Creek3
Lare4
106
1
0
0
9
Total
$/Year
.035
.301
.569
.015
O&M Costs
$71000 gal
0
0
0
0
.214
.916
.482
.243
O&M
106
0
0
0
0
Costs for
$/Year 5
.141
.035
.121
.407
P
t/1
0
0
0
0
Removal
000 gal
.030
.107
.109
.011
% Tota
for P
14
11
22
4
1 O&M
Removal
.0
.7
.6
.5

 Base Period:   Nov.  '78-April  '79
2
 Base Period:   Summer '79;  excluding sludge costs,  which were unavailable because
               of recent changeover to alum treatment approach

3Base Period:   1978
4
 Base Period:   Feb.  '79-June '79
                                        85

-------
               TABLE 11.   BREAKDOWN  OF  ASSOCIATED O&M  COSTS

Item
Labor
Power
Chemical
Sludge
Disposal
Item
Labor
Power
Chemical
Sludge
Disposal
GCO1
Unit Cost $/1000
$7.00/hr <0
$0.031/Kw-hr <0
$0.059/lb 0
liquid alum
$71.40/ton 0
dry solids
Big Sister Creek3
gallons
.001
.001
.025
.004

Unit Cost $/1000 gallons
$7.00/hr
Unavailable
FeCla $0. 0895/1 b
Polymer $1.40/lb
$223/ton
dry solids
0.081
0.004
0.011
0.013
II)
Unit Cost
$6.00/hr
$0.06/Kw-hr
Unavailable
Unavailable
Frank Van
Unit Cost
$7.00/hr
$0.029/Kw-hr
Alum $0. 059/1 b
Polymer $1.32/lb
$158/ton
dry solids
2
$/1000 gallons
0.038
0.019
0.050
-
La re4
$71000 gallons
0.0001
0.0001
0.0007
0.004

1
 Base Period:
?
"Base Period:
 Base Period:
 Base Period:
Nov. '79-April '79
Summer 1979
1978
Feb. '79-June '79
                                     86

-------
                 TABLE 12.   SLUDGE PRODUCTION  AT THE  FOUR
                            MONITORED  TREATMENT PLANTS
GCO

Ely

Big Sister Creek

Frank Van Lare
 Total  Sludge
lbs/106 gallons


     1387

     3415

      990

     1529
                                                               P Sludge
                                                           lbs/106 gallons
120

 82

116

252
                                     87

-------
primary and secondary sludges generated at wastewater treatment



plants.  The costs shown in Table 11 for sludge disposal were



calculated from stoichiometric relationships and then assigning



that fraction of the unit cost to the phosphorus sludge.  There-



fore, they are probably on the liberal side.





CONCLUSION



The survey and field studies of phosphorus removal performance



at municipal wastewater treatment plants in the lower Great



Lakes basins were quite useful in revealing the current trends



in full-scale phosphorus removal practice and the keys to



successful phosphorus removal.  Our survey showed that the basic



approach most frequently employed to comply with present phos-



phorus effluent restrictions amounted to ^he addition of iron or



aluminum to the wastewater at some point in a conventional



secondary treatment system.  Furthermore, both the survey and



the field studies indicated that average final effluent total



phosphorus concentrations of less than 1.0 mgP/L could be



reliably attained without resorting to filtration.





Based on the field studies, achieving a low concentration and



less available phosphorus effluent via chemical treatment could



best be accomplished by converting as much of the wastewater



phosphorus to a particulate form, followed by conservative design



and operation of clarification facilities.  In the four plants



studied, phosphorus removal problems were the result of over-



loaded settling tanks.  On the other hand, the G-C-0 plant total



phosphorus effluent averaged 0.75 mgP/L while operating the final
                                88

-------
                                             2
clarifier at overflow rates of 300-450 gpd/ft , conservative

                                                   2
operation compared to the design rate of 650 gpd/ft .  At Big


Sister Creek, a tertiary plant, an effluent level of 0.5 mgP/L


was consistently met by operating the solids contact clarifier


for the iron + polymer treated secondary effluent at overflow

                                 2
rates ranging from 380-550 gpd/ft .  The filtration step,


although reducing the average particulate P solids contact


clarifier effluent from 0.19 mgP/L to 0.06 mgP/L in the sand


filter effluent, proved to be unnecessary for achieving a 0.5


mgP/L standard.




Consequently, in planning and designing for phosphorus removal


at municipal facilities careful evaluation of less costly,


alternative treatment approaches should be performed before


resorting to a more expensive filtration process.  Furthermore,


more full-scale studies should be undertaken to optimize


chemical addition at some point in a conventional secondary


treatment system as a phosphorus removal alternative.  Optimi-


zation of such operational parameters as point of chemical


addition and dosage, clarifier overflow rates, and solids


retention times should be the focus of these studies.
                               89

-------
REFERENCES

1.  APHA, Standard Methods.   1975.   14th Edition,  American
    Public Health Association,  Washington,  D.C.

2.  DePinto, J.V.  1978a.   Phosphorus Availability of Aquatic
    Sediment Material: A Review.   Environmental  Engineering
    Technical Report.  Clarkson College of  Technology,
    Potsdam, N.Y.  24 pp.

3.  DePinto, J.V.  1978b.   Annual Progress  Report of EPA Grant
    No. R-804937.  November 1,  1976 - October 31,  1977.

4.  IJC.  1978.  Great Lakes Water Quality  Agreement of  1978.

5.  IJC.  1979.  Inventory of Major Municipal and Industrial
    Point Source Dischargers in the Great Lakes  Basin.  Great
    Lakes Water Quality Board Remedial Programs  Subcommittee.

6.  McKosky, P.M.  1978.  Laboratory Study  of the Kinetics of
    Phytoplankton Decomposition and Subsequent Phosphorus
    Regeneration.  M.S. Thesis.  Clarkson College of Technology,
    Potsdam, N.Y.  99 pp.

7.  Sagher, A., R.F. Harris, and D.E. Armstrong.  1975.
    Availability of sediment phosphorus to  microorganisms.
    Technical Report WISWRC-75-01.   Water Resources Center,
    University of Wisconsin, Madison.

8.  USEPA.  1976.  Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
    Wastes.  U.S.E.P.A. Office of Technology Transfer,
    Cincinnati, Ohio.
                               90

-------
                EXPERIENCES AT GLADSTONE, MICHIGAN
             UTILIZING ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
            FOR BOD-5, PHOSPHORUS, AND AMMONIA CONTROL

                          Willard Morley
                          Superintendent
                   Water & Wastewater Treatment
                       Gladstone, Michigan
INTRODUCTION

In March of 1974, the first federally funded municipal waste-

water treatment plant utilizing Rotating Biological  Contactors

(RBC) was placed in operation in Gladstone, Michigan.  The plant

was designed by Williams & Works of Grand Rapids, Michigan to

replace an existing primary treatment plant at the same  site.

Because, in many respects, this plant was the first  of its kind

in the United States, the performance of the system  in a mod-

erately severe northern climate has received a relatively high

degree of scrutiny by engineers and manufacturers engaged in the

design of other RBC installations.  The design considerations

for this plant, operating data for four years of operation, and

some general observations about RBC installations based on the

Gladstone experience will be presented in this paper.


DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Gladstone, Michigan is a predominantly residential community of

about 5,000 people located in the southern part of Michigan's

Upper Peninsula, on the shore of Lake Michigan, approximately 10

miles north of Escanaba.  The climate in the area is character-

ized by cool, dry summers and cold, snowy winters.   The mean
                               91

-------
annual temperature is 42°F (5.5°C).  Gladstone derives its water



supply from Lake Michigan and wastewater temperatures  are



frequently in the mid 40's (°F) during winter months.






The 1.0 mgd (3,785 cu m/day)  RBC plant was designed to provide



secondary treatment and phosphorus removal on the site of an



existing primary treatment plant.  A system incorporating housed



rotating biological contactors was selected on the basis of



aesthetics, operational advantages, and data from successful




pilot plant testing.   The general design parameters are listed




in Table 1.






                             Table 1



                    General Design Parameters



     Population                 10,000



     BOD-5                      1,670 Ib/day (9758 kg/day)



     TSS                        2,000 Ib/day (908 kg/day)



     Average Daily Flow         1.0 mgd (3,785 cu m/day)



     Peak Flow                  2.88 mgd (10,000 cu m/day)



     Effluent Quality Limitations:



        BOD-5                   30 mg/1 (30-day average)



        Total Suspended Solids  30 mg/1 (30-day average)



        Total Phosphorus (TP.)   20% of influent TP






General pilot plant tests of the RBC process were conducted at



the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor in 1968-1969 under the



supervision of Professor J.A. Borchardt.  The pilot plant



consisted of three stages in series, each with fifty, 4-foot
                               92

-------
(1.22 m) diameter, 0.5-inch (1.27 cm) thick disks, with 0.75-in.

(1.90 cm)  spacings between the disks.  The pilot plant was

operated for approximately one year using raw wastewater and

primary effluent from the Ann Arbor municipal treatment plant.

Some results of the pilot plant tests are summarized in Table 2.

In general, this jpilot plant expeerience offered the following

design considerations:

     Primary treatment is necessary to prevent accumulations of
     debris on RBC shafts and to increase overall BOD-5
     removals.

     The RBC  shafts must be rotated at a speed sufficient to
     entrain sloughings and mixed liquor solids.  At low speeds,
     solids accumulations within the RBC tankage caused the
     depletion of dissolved oxygen and created odor nuisances.

     An average of 80 to 93 percent overall BOD-5 removals were
     consistently achieved at hydraulic loadings of 1 to 4 gpd
     per sq. ft. and at temperatures ranging from 48° to 63°F.

     At similar hydraulic loadings, BOD-5 reductions through the
     RBC process dropped about 1% for each 1°C drop in
     wastewater temperature.


A schematic flow diagram of the treatment facility is shown in

Figure 1.  The design parameters of the unit processes and

appurtenant equipment are summarized in Table 3.  Raw wastewater

is screened and pumped to two grit chambers, then it is

comminuted and settled in a single, rectangular primary

clarifier, salvaged from the old plant.  Primary clarifier

effluent is split to two parallel RBC paths, each with three

shafts and six stages.  Mixed liquor within the RBC tanks flows

through 2-foot (0.61 m) diameter submerged openings to

subsequent stages.  RBC efluent is dosed with liquid alum for

phosphorus precipitation prior to pumping to twin rectangular
                               93

-------
                                  INFLUENT
 LANDFILL
SLUDGE
DRYING
 BEDS
SECONDARY
  DIGESTER
   PRIMARY
  DIGESTER
                                          BAR SCREEN
                                 — «£>}   RAW SEWAGE PUMPS
                                          GRIT CHAMBERS
                                ARSHALL FLUME

                               COMMINUTOR


                               PRIMARY CLARIFIER
                                              ROTATING
                                              BIOLOGICAL
                                              CONTACTORS

                                            ^-{LIQUID ALUM FEED)

                                              SECONDARY PUMPS

                                             ^(POLYMER FEED)


                                              FINAL CLARIFIERS
            TO LAKE MICHIGAN4
                                  CHLORINE
                                  CONTACT
                                  CHAMBER
                Figure 1.  Wastewater Treatment System
                          Gladstone, Michigan
                                94

-------

rH rH
rH 05
03 >
rJ 0
0) g
> 0)
O «
in
• ' — *
ro o
00 •
1 o
in oo
• —
ro
r-
tu
Cn
T3 05
S-l 4->
ro CO
in o>
^* •
1 rH
oo co
J '»-•-''

0)
Cn
T3 05
C -U
rH CM CO
^D
in ^~
\ o>
oo ro
t ^^^
\
Cn
g
0)
en
in 4-> 03
>1 1 CO 4-1
rJ Q rH CO
i£> ^~.
V— O>
I in
U3 -^
ro
05 O
g CQ
g C7< ^
3 • •
CO g rH
•H 14-1
i — I ^-l 4-1
05 ft W
ro o
rH O
1 rH
f^\ •**—*
tjl ^"^
^
O
g
CM Q)
(X S
QJ 05
rH in tf
X! 1
^}* ^-^
ro 3^
CN in
1 rH
V£> —
05 Q  Q) M • — >
c -u at a •
05 CO 4-> g fci
rH 05 05 
ro in
in — *
4->
0
rH rO C —
•H 0) O CQ
ft 4-> -H (U
05 -»-> 4-1
g C 3
•H ij a
as cr
ti
0
•H
M
<\)
ft
4->
CO
0)
EH




^
CM



T3
a
en
Q
• o
"* 0
in
«•
rH

ro in
in — '






vo
ro



T!
a
Cn
in
k£> 0
• o
CM O
^
0
rH
a\
VO
\
00
	 1
^n
\
^u
^^
1
ro
\
«*
r~-
• ^^k
in ^o
~~\ •
1 00
l^> —

in
VD «
rH rH
1 rH
CO ^

in CM
CM •
1 CT>
rH rH
I ^^



00 -—
(Ti CM
1 ^0
i^M •— ^
in


CM -^
O CM
CM &
1 rH
•
-------
                             Table 3
                 Unit Process and Equipment Data
     Equipment

Raw Sewage Pumps



Primary Clarifier
RBC Units
RBC Effluent Pumps

Secondary Clarifiers



Chlorine Contact


Primary Digester
Secondary Digester




Tank Truck


Drying Beds



Liquid Alum Storage
          Design Data

30 1,400  gpm (88.3 I/sec), 2
variable speed,  1 constant speed
lag pump

1 rectangular 70,000 gallon (265
cu m) capacity with 1.5 hr.
detention and 895 gpd/sq ft
(36.5 cu m/day/sq m) overflow
rate

Bio-Surf by Autotrol.  Two
parallel paths with three shafts
and six stages in each, 515,500
ft2 (47,890  sq m) of media,
90 minutes retention and 1.94
gpd/sq ft (0.097) cu m/day/sq m)
hydraulic loading rate

Same as raw sewage pumps

2 rectangular, 2.75 hr detention
and 620  gpd/sq ft (25.3 cu
m/day/m2) overflow rate

2 baffled tanks, 35 min reten-
tion

1 fixed cover, 100,000 gal
(378.5 cu m) capacity with 15.5
days detention at design
loading, heated, mixed by gas
recirculation

1 floating cover, 100,000 gallon
(378.5  cu m) capacity with
supernatant discharge to raw
wastewater wet well

1 2,500 gallon (9.4 m3)
capacity

Adjoining sanitary landfill
site, 600' x 200' (183 m x 61 m)
without underdrains

2 tanks, each 2,600 gallons (9.8
cu m) capacity
                                96

-------
clarifiers.  Secondary effluent is chlorinated prior to



discharge to Lake Michigan.






Grit is manually cleaned from the grit chambers and disposed of



at a sanitary landfill.  Settled primary and secondary sludges



are pumped to a primary anaerobic digester that is heated and



equipped with gas recirculation and mixing apparatus.  Settled,



digested sludge from the secondary digester is withdrawn by tank



truck to sludge drying beds off-site.  Dried sludge is disposed



of in a sanitary landfill.  Supernatant from the secondary



digester is drained by gravity to the raw wastewater wet well.





INITIAL OPERATING EXPERIENCE



The operation of the plant was begun on March 1, 1974.  At the



same time, an 18-month testing and shakedown program was begun



to monitor the performance of the plant and to make operational



improvements where necessary.  During this period, wastewater



flows averaged 0.755 mgd (2,875 cu m/day) and were influenced



occasionally by sewer infiltration and inflows.  At start-up,



wastewater temperatures averaged 45°F (7.2°C), then gradually



increased to the low 60's (°F) by mid-summer.






Influent BOD-5 concentrations ranged from 129 to 219 mg/1 and



influent total suspended solids concentrations ranged from 101



mg/1 to 168 mg/1.   The average influent BOD-5 and total



suspended solids concentrations for the test period were 164



mg/1 and 132 mg/1, respectively.
                               97

-------
The results of the initial 18-month test period are summarized

as follows:

     Because the influent wastewater temperatures were quite
     cold at start-up, it took 18 days before heavy sloughings
     of biomass were observed and several months to achieve a
     steady state operation.

     During the last 12 months of the testing period (September
     1974 through September 1975) with the addition of 70 mg/1
     of alum and 0.8 mg/1 of  polymer, effluent BOD-5's were
     generally less than 10 mg/1; effluent suspended solids
     averaged 15 mg/1; and effluent total phosphorus con-
     centrations were less than 1.6 mg/1.

     In January 1975, design  flow conditions were simulated for
     two weeks by shutting down one of the parallel RBC paths
     and one of the final clarifiers.  The effluent BOD-5 for
     this two-week test period averaged 19 mg/1, while the
     average wastewater temperature was 47°F (8.3°C).
     Because of low hydraulic loadings (1.0 to 2.1
     nitrification occurred; 50% to 60% reductions in ammonia
     nitrogen occurred during the winter months and 85% to 95%
     reductions occurred during summer months.

     After one of the RBC paths was restarted in February 1975,
     after being shut down for full scale tests, nitrifiers did
     not re-establish dominant cultures on latter stages until
     June, when wastewater temperatures approached 60 °F
     Excellent BOD-5, suspended solids and ammonia nitrogen
     removals permitted reductions in effluent chlorine doses,
     from 6-7 mg/1 to 2-3 mg/1.

     Recycling of secondary sludge through the primary clarifier
     was required to thicken the combined sludges from 2% - 3%
     solids to 4% - 5% solids content.

     Slug releases of digester supernatant to the head end of
     the plant were detrimental to overall nitrification
     results.  Controlled release of digester supernatant is
     considered essential to achieve consistent ammonia
     nitrogen reduction.

     No significant differences were noticed in the digesti-
     bility of sludges with or without alum addition.  Phos-
     phorus release, volatile solids reduction, or gas
     production were not significantly affected by alum
     addition.  The average total sludge production was 0.83 Ib
     of total solids per pound of BOD-5 removed.  This figure
     takes into account chemical sludge production.


                                98

-------
     The measured power usage by the rotating biological
     contactor shafts ranged from 5.6 hp to 3.5 hp.  The average
     running horsepower per shaft was 4.2 hp.


PLANT PERFORMANCE (1976-1979)

The overall performance of the plant, subsequent to the 18-month

test program, is summarized in Table 4.  The data covers the

period from January 1976 through December 1979.  Table 5 shows a

comparison of plant performance under summer and winter con-

ditions.  Data for these tables was obtained from the monthly

operating reports prepared by the plant operators.


This data shows that the plant is consistently removing over 90%

of influent BOD-5 even under winter conditions and at hydraulic

loading rates of between 1.0 and 1.4 gpd/ft2.  Wastewater

strength is affected by increased infiltration and inflow during

warm weather months.  During winter months, effluent BOD-5

concentrations increase as wastewater temperatures decrease to

lows of 45°F.  Effluent dissolved oxygen concentrations are

consistently above 7 mg/1.


Effluent total suspended solids concentrations remained fairly

consistent throughout the period at an average of about 16 mg/1.

The hydraulic profile of the plant is such that secondary solids

are pumped twice prior to removal with settled primary solids.

The addition of polymer assists secondary sedimentation, and

lower suspended solids concentrations could probably be obtained

in the final effluent if flocculants were not disturbed by the

centrifugal pumps.
                               99

-------
                                    Table 4
                              Performance Summary
     Parameter
 1976
- - Annual Averages •
    1977        1978
             1979
BOD-5 (mg/1)
  -Influent
  -Effluent
  -% Removed
TSS (mg/1)
  -Influent
  -Effluent
VSS (mg/1)
  -Influent
  -Effluent
Total Phosphorus (mg/1)
  -Influent
  -Effluent
  -% Removed
Ammonia-N (mg/1)
  -Influent
  -Effluent
  -% Removed
Eff. Dissolved Oxygen  (mg/1)
Raw Sludge Pumped (Ib VSS/day)
Digester Gas Prod, (cu.ft./day)
Chemicals Used  (Ib/day)
  -Chlorine
  -Alum
  -Polymer
   182
     6
    97%

   135
    15

   111
     8
7.8
1.4
    82%
7.3
   576
 4,307

    13
   435
1.5

1







6
1

15
3

7




.725
.41
143
7
95%
122
16
95
7
.3
.1
83%
.5
.5
77%
.6
544
3,981
19
485
.612
1.19
155
7
95%
139
17
112
8
4.7
0.9
81%
17.4
2.1
88%
7.6
512
3,954
12
365
.712
1.38
129
12
91%
118
16
92
9
3.5
0.9
74%
15.9
2.0
87%
8.2
544
3,718
12
262
    1.7
1.5
1.4
                                    100

-------
                               Table  5

                    Comparative Performance Summary

                      Winter vs Summer Operation
                                   Average Winter    Average Summer
                                     Values I/         Values 2/
Flow  (mgd)                          0.530             0.726
Hydraulic Loading (gpd/sq.ft.)       1.03              1.41
Waste Temperature (°F)              46                64
BOD-5  (mg/1)
  -Influent                        181               128
  -Effluent                         10                 9
  -% Removed                        94                93
TSS (mg/1)
  -Influent                        140               130
  -Effluent                         16                16
Total Phosphorus (mg/1)
  -Influent                          5.8               4.7
  -Effluent                          0.8               1.0
  -% Removed                        86                79
Ammonia-N (mg/1)
  -Influent                         20.0              15.1
  -Effluent                          4.9               1.0
  -% Removed                        76                93
Effluent Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1)     8.1               7.3
\J From January, February, March, 1977 through 1979 reported data.

2/ From July, August, September, 1977 through 1979 reported data.
                                101

-------
More than 80% of influent total phosphorus concentrations are



removed by the addition of alum (hydrated aluminum sulfate).



Plant operators attempt to maintain a liquid alum dosage rate



sufficient to provide 1.5 moles of aluminum to 1.0 mole of



influent total phosphorus.






The plant was not designed to accomplish nitrification.



However, because it is currently operated at hydraulic loadings



of less than 2 gpd/ft^, nitrification does occur.  Ammonia



analyses show that average influent ammonia concentrations of 16



mg/1 to 18 mg/1 are reduced to 2 mg/1 to 4 mg/1 through the



plant.  As might be expected, less nitrification occurs during



winter months.






In 1979, an average of 710 pounds per day of sludge was pumped



to the primary digester with an average solids content of 3.7%




by weight.  The volatile content of the sludge averaged 74% by



weight.  Total sludge production, including chemical sludges,



averaged 1.14 pounds per pound of BOD-5 removed, or approxi-



mately 1,000 pounds per million gallons treated.  Approximately



262 pounds per day of alum was added to remove an average of 2.6



mg/1 of total phosphorus.





OVERALL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE




The Gladstone plant is staffed by one superintendent and three



shift operators.  The plant is manned 16 hours per day, five



days a week; eight hours per day on week-ends and holidays.  The



superintendent also has the responsibility of the water



filtration plant, staffed by two operators.  Most of the





                               102

-------
operators are cross-trained to provide flexibility.  All opera-



tors are state certified and operate shifts on a rotational



basis.





All laboratory tests are conducted according to "Standard




Methods", 14th edition.






Flows are measured weekly at the Parshall flume to check the




flow meter.  The chlorinator, sampler, alum and polymer feeders




are regulated by the flow meter.






Secondary sludge is returned at least five times per day to the



primary clarifier to thicken the combined sludges from 2%-3% to



4%-5% solids content.  The combined sludge is then pumped to the



primary anaerobic digester.  Digesting sludges are monitored



weekly for volatile acid/alkalinity relationships and volatile



content.  When the volatile percentage is less than 50% and the



supernatant shows excessive solids, sludge is hauled by tanker




to the drying beds.  The digesters are cleaned and inspected at



three year intervals.






The RBC units are greased at the main bearings twice per week



with 5 to 6 shots of grease.  The oil in the chain casings and



speed reducers is changed yearly or more often if the oil should



become diluted with water.  The walkways and the area around the



disks are scrubbed weekly.  The tanks are drained and flushed



yearly for a general inspection.  Very little accumulation has



ever been found.  The three V-belts on the drive units are



replaced about yearly upon breakage.   One main shaft bearing



failed in the six years of operation.



                               103

-------
The plant staff also maintains the six lift stations throughout



the 22 miles (35.4 km) of the collection system, which ranges in



size from 4 inches (10.2 cm) to 3D inches (76.2 cm).  Most of



the collection system was installed during the 1920's  and



1930's, and was a combined system until new storm sewers were




installed in the late 1950's.  This contributes at  times, to



excessive infiltration and inflow during snow melts, severe



rains and high lake levels.  Step I studies are presently being




conducted to locate the problem areas of the system.



Maintenance of the collection system other than the lift



stations is performed by the Public Works Department.






PROBLEMS THAT DEVELOPED



During the first years of operation a few problems  developed and



were solved by the operators.  These included changes in alum



feed points, sampling equipment, digester piping, and sludge



handling.  The problems as well as the solutions we employed are



explained below.






ALUM APPLICATION POINTS



It was found that during low flows the alum dosages needed to be



increased considerably to remove the required amounts.  Also,



with low flows, concentrations of phosphorus increased, creating




the need for an increase in alum application.






Feed points at the secondary wet well did not provide enough



turbulance for proper mixing, so a temporary feed line was



installed to the sixth stage of each RBC path.  This provided



enough dispersion for coagulation and flocculation, but after






                                104

-------
passing over a weir, through the wet well, and being pumped  to



the secondary clarifier, the floe was broken up.  By adding  alum



to the primary wet well, dosages could be reduced at times,  but



results were not consistent.






Temporary lines were installed in 1979 to the discharge side of



the primary pumps.  A 30% reduction in the feed rate was found



to achieve the same results.  Permanent feed lines were then



installed to each of the primary pumps.  This has proven




effective during both low and high flows.






METHANE GAS UTILIZATION



The heating system of the building and the primary anaerobic



digester was designed to use both methane and natural gas.




Methane gas has a content of about 650 BTU per cubic foot, and



the boiler needed a rate of 5090 cubic feet per hour.  The gas



pressure in the digester would raise a column of water 10 inches



(25.4 cm).  A 2-inch (5.1 cm) gas pipe had been installed from




both digesters.  The floating cover of the secondary digester



can hold about 4,000 cubic feet of gas.  A sufficient gas rate



was not available to sustain the gas boiler, since the piping



extends some 70 feet (21.5 m),  plus the meter, check valve,



flame arrester, and etc.  By reducing the orifices of the



burner, some gas could be burned at times.






With the cleaning of the digesters in 1977, the portion of



2-inch (5.1 cm) pipe inside the secondary digester was changed



to 4-inch (10.2 cm) with the intent of changing all the piping



to this larger size.






                               105

-------
After temporarily connecting to clean the primary digester and
to burn off the gas, we found the boiler would operate at all
times.  The remainder of the pipe has never been changed.

SLUDGE ODORS
Sludge, especially when controlling ammonia, must be removed at
intervals of 2 to 3 hours to eliminate bulking and its odors.
Sludge remaining at the bottom of the clarifiers will soon
become anaerobic and de-nitrify.  Higher temperatures will also
accelerate bulking.

Secondary sludge must be removed manually.  When the plant is
not manned on week-ends and holidays, we occasionally experience
rising sludge.  An automatic sludge removal system would be
advantageous, as these clarifiers are uncovered and the odors
are readily noticed by our neighbors.

Combined sludges are pumped to the anaerobic digesters at two to
three hour intervals to assure proper utilization of digester
capacity and functions.

DIGESTER UPSET
In the six years of operations, only once were the digesters
upset.  This happened in 1976, when gas production ceased and
the digesters went  "sour".  The nitrifiers on the RBC units were
disrupted as well.

The supernatant from the primary digester contained small
cellophane-type pieces of irregular shapes, somewhat resembling
bleached potato peelings.  The volatile acid/alkalinity ratio
rose above 1.0 and  the pH was dropping below 6.4.
                                106

-------
To correct the problem, heat was maintained at 90°F in the



digester and continuous mixing was was employed.  About 300




pounds of soda ash were added over a 10-day period to hold the



pH near 7.0.  Within two weeks the digesters were back



functioning normally.






The only explanation as to the cause of the upset was that the



city fire department floor had been stripped of several layers



of paint using paint remover which was flushed to the sanitary



sewers.






SAMPLING EQUIPMENT INADEQUACIES



The original sampling equipment supplied with the plant did not




provide representative samples.  The three samples required were



raw wastewater, primary effluent, and final effluent.  Only the



final effluent samples could be collected continuously.






The samplers had a small opening about the size of the lead in a



pencil, and the raw and primary effluent samples soon clogged



the orifice.  The pumps for raw and primary effluent had 1



1/2-inch (3.8 cm) suction piping but only 1-inch (2.54 cm)



discharges.  The primary effluent would pass easily enough,



however, the raw pump would plug at the 1-inch opening almost



immediately.






In 1975, a dipper type three-stage sampler with refrigeration



was purchased from "Sonford Products" of Minneapolis, Minnesota



and installed by the plant operators.  All piping to the sampler



was increased to 1 1/2-inch (3.8 cm) with provisions provided
                               107

-------
for backflushing with final effluent.  A submersible raw sample



pump was installed directly behind the bar screen.  The pump



delivers 15 gallons per minute to the sampler and seldom causes



any problems.  The new sampling system works well with very



little maintenance and we are assured of representative samples.





ENERGY AND CHEMICAL COSTS



The energy and chemical uses and costs associated with the plant



operation for 1978 are summarized in Table 6.  The costs shown



per million gallons reflect actual prices Gladstone paid for the



respective commodities in 1978.





Electricity consumption is of primary interest and the table



shows electrical power consumption in terms of raw sewage



pumping, secondary (RBC) treatment, and anaerobic digestion.



The power consumption for the RBC units actually includes power



consumption by clarifier drives, intermediate pumps, lights,



ventilating equipment, etc., and computes to an average of



approximately 38 running horsepower at any given time.  Of this,



approximately 80 percent (30 hp), including power draw by the



RBC units, could be considered independent of actual flows.



Based on measured power consumptions by the six RBC drive units



in 1975, the RBC system draws an average of 25-26 horsepower at



any given time.





TOTAL FACILITY BUDGET



Table 7 begins with the total facility budget and is followed by
                                                          f


some of the major operating expenses.  The remainder of the



budget  incorporates items such as the collection system, audit,



administration, engineering, insurances, and etc.

                               108

-------
               -P
               W
               o
               u  o
               -P
               O
               EH
                             CN
                                               o
                                               o
             CM
                            vo  CN
                            CN  m
                                                              oo
                                                                   o
                                                                   o
                                                         m
                                                         o
               03
               •H   03
               g  XI
               CU  hj
    o
I    CN
                                                    CN
                             I    I
             m
                                                                                            00








v>
CU
rH
O
03
EH





03
D
rH
03
O
•H
g
CU
u

Ti
C
03

!>i
cn
CU
C
w


c
03
cn
• H
J3
O
•rH

*
CU
c
o
-p
03
03
rH
o
CO
0)   33
3
&H   O
     o
     o
               O   O
              •H   a
               u
               CU

               w
                              1    1
             1    1
                             vo
                             CN
                                                1     1
                                                              n   m
                                                              r-   o
                                                              ro
                                                                                  CN
                                                                                           o
                                                                                           CN
                                                                                           m
                                                                    I    I
                                                         00
                                                         o
                                                                                                          Q
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          a

                                                                                                          CN
                                                                        W
                                                                        03
                                                                        3
                                                                                                          03
Cn
4-1
C
CU
g
-P
(0
CU
Jj
EH

>i
!L-|
03
t3
C
O
O
CU
CO
c
•H
p.
g
3
PH

CU
cn
03
5
CU
co

3
03
OS










E
CU
-P
W
>i
co

CJ
CQ
K








C
O
•H
Jj
03
C
-H
^j
O
rH
r\
CJ




rH
03
>
O
g
CU
A

03
3
S-i
O
x:

03
0

OH









Vl
CU
g
g >1
3 rH
rH O



±J
CU

03
4-)
C
CU
g
.p
03
CU

EH

CU

T3
3
rH
CO
j y
CU U
03 3
C \ i
1
S-i
Q







-P
03
03
3
O
CU
c
03
rH
^H
CU
O
03
•H
a
CU
K

cn
c
-rH
'U
rH
-H
3
cn










a
a
EH
CO
>H
CO

J
"32
EH
O
EH
                                                                                                          3
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          rH
                                                                                                          fc
                                                                                                          03
                                                                                                          Q
                                                                                                               0)
                                                                                                              rH

                                                                                                              jQ
                                                                                                              •H

                                                                                                               Cn
                                                                        CU   Cn
                                                                        Cn  CU
                                                                        03
                                                                        SJ
                                                                        CU

                                                                       s
                                                                                                               II
                                                       109

-------
                             Table 7

                     1979 Fiscal Year Budget



Total Facility Budget                               $178,000.00


Power
     Lift Stations     32,607 KWH
     Plant            313,627 KWH

     Total Power Costs                                14,781.97

Natural Gas         1,185,490 cu ft                    2,861,87

Chlorine                4,550 Ibs                        827.25

Aluminum Sulfate       95,648 Ibs                      4,497.96

Polymer                   501 Ibs                      1,005.52

Labor                   7,136 man-hours               57,088.00

Plant Maintenance                                      3,000.00

Parts, Supplies, Miscellaneous                         4,000.00

Equipment Rentals                                      3,000.00
                                110

-------
REVENUE TO OPERATE

In 1972, water meters were installed in every home.  The water

plant staff maintains these meters.  All meters larger than

1-inch are checked at three year intervals.  Small household

meters are checked to assure accuracy as needed.  Ten percent of

the meters have registered 1 million gallons since 1972 and a

routine maintenance program is being initiated.


The water distribution system originally began in 1889 and at

the present, approximately 72% of the water produced can be

accounted for..  63% of the water treated at the wastewater plant

comes from inflow and infiltration.


Prior to 1969, no wastewater charges were collected, with the

system operating solely on taxes.  Water charges prior to 1970

averaged $1.00 per month.  Today, with the new water filtration

plant and the upgraded wastewater facility, the average house-

hold using 5,000 gallons of water pays $11.65 for water and

$10.49 for wastewater per month.

                           i
SUMMARY

We believe the RBC treatment system is an ideal treatment

process for the city of Gladstone, Michigan.  Excellent

treatment results are being obtained and plant effluent quality

is well within design limits.   Consistent nitrification at

loading below 2 gpd/sq ft is being achieved as an added bonus

toward high quality treatment.
                              Ill

-------
The system has been very consistent in achieving wastewater



treatment and permitting stable solids handling procedures.  Few



problems have occurred with the day-to-day operation of our RBC



secondary treatment system.






ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



The author wishes to thank Williams & Works of Grand Rapids,



Michigan for their cooperation in the preparation of this paper.
                               112

-------
              CONTROL TECHNOLOGY FOR NUTRIENTS IN
           MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN SWEDEN

                       Bengt G. Hultman
                       Research Engineer
        Swedish Water and Waste Water Works Association
                       Regeringsgatan 86
                      S-lll 39  STOCKHOLM
                             Sweden
NEED FOR NUTRIENTS CONTROL

Sweden is comparatively rich in lakes with more than 20,000 ex-

ceeding 0.1 sq. km in area. Most of them are fairly shallow. In

their natural states the lakes and coastal areas are deficient in

nutrients. This means that the lakes and coastal areas will react

to artificial supply of nutrients from for instance urban areas.


At the end of the 1950~s limnologists began to warn about the

deterioration of the water quality in lakes and coastal areas

due to the increased rate of the growth of algae and other vege-

tation. Rodhe  (1958) pointed out that the phosphorus in sewage

could increase the productivity in natural waters as much as com-

mersial fertilisers applied on land. Different investigations on

lakes indicated a significant rise in the water's content of

phosphorus and biomass.


During two weeks in August 19-72 an extensive lake survey was car-

ried out by the National Swedish Environment Protection Board and

the County Administrations (Johansson and Karlgren, 1974). A to-

tal of 1250 minor and medium-sized lakes were examined. Although

not being the primary aim of the study, an attempt was made to

estimate the degree of nutritional influence on the lakes resul-
                                 113

-------
ting from human activities.  It was found that the inorganic phos-

phate content in water showed similar regional variations as that

of total phosphorus and of total nitrogen with low concentrations

in the low-productive lakes in northern Sweden and parts of south-

ern Sweden and high concentrations in the high-productive lakes

of the plains.


Based on the lake survey and complementary studies Hannerz and

Forsberg (1975) estimated that less than 10 % of the Swedish la-

kes were eutrophic. In south Sweden about 10 to 20 % of the lakes

were eutrophic and the percentage of eutrophic lakes in the Stock-

holm county amounted to about 50 %.


Several substances such as phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon dioxide,

iron and vitamins can stimulate algal growth. Of these substances

only phosphorus and nitrogen have been considered as main factors

for stimulating eutrophication. A strong emphasis has been laid

on phosphorus removal as the method for control of eutrophication

especially from the National Swedish Environment Protection Board,

while nitrogen has been considered to be of minor importance. The

reasons for this view seem to be:

         Phosphorus seems to be rate limiting for algal growth
         in most Swedish lakes based on values of the weight pro-
         portion of nitrogen to phosphorus, which is about 25:1
         for natural or low polluted lakes. '

         A large fraction of phosphorus comes from point sources
         which may be more easily controlled than diffusive sour-
         ces.

      -  Algae have the possibility of taking up nitrogen from the
         atmosphere if nitrogen is a limiting growth factor.
                                 114

-------
       In the end of the 1960's phosphorus removal was a much
       more wellknown technique than nitrogen removal in Sweden.


For a total of about 900 samples from surface water from 20 waste

affected lakes in Sweden during August-October 1972 Forsberg et

al. (1975)  found phosphorus to be the growth limiting nutrient

in waters having total-P values less than 0.05 mg/1. Above 0.1

mg P/l nitrogen played the principal role. Between these values

the growth was primarily limited by phosphorus or nitrogen or

chelating agents.


Nitrogen seems to be the primarily rate limiting factor for algal

growth in case of eutrophic lakes (Forsberg, 1977) and in some

coastal waters as the Stockholm archipelago  (Lindahl and Melin,

1973). In this case the policy of the National Swedish Environ-

ment Protection Board has been to try to reduce the phosphorus

supply to the water body as much as possible in order to make

phosphorus the growth limiting substance  (Anonymous, 1971).


IMPLEMENTATION OF NUTRIENTS CONTROL


LEGISLATION AND ADMINISTRATION

Legislation concerning discharge of waste water into lakes and

rivers has been in existence in Sweden since the end of the

1930's. A new law, the Environment Protection Act, came into for-

ce in July 1969 and tightened up regulations considerably.


The Environment Protection Act applies to what are termed pollu-

ting activities, i.e. the discharge of effluent, solids or gas
                                 115

-------
from land, a building or an installation or the use of such pro-



perty in a manner liable to cause water pollution, atmospheric



pollution, noise, vibration, the emission of light etc., if the



nuisance thus caused is more than temporary (National Swedish



Environment Protection Board, 1979a).






The chief principle of the act is to prevent environmental dis-



turbances as far as possible. The precautionary measures, such



as effective methods of wastewater treatment,  shall be "economi-



cally feasible" and "technically practible".






Sewage from locations with more than 200 inhabitants must not be



emitted without a permit. A special board, the Franchise Board



for Protection of the Environment, holds the responsibility for



the granting of permits. The obligation to apply for a permit is



however not compulsory. The National Swedish Environment Protection



Board may after due examination exempt an applicant from the need



to apply to the Franchise Board for a permit.  In exemption cases,



the Board attempts through negotiations to come to an agreement



with the applicant as to the conditions to be applied to the ac-



tivity. An exemption granted lacks formal legal validity - as



opposed to a permit - and may be withdrawn  (National Swedish En-



vironment Protection Board, 1979a).






SOURCE CONTROL



The synthetic detergents which were introduced in Sweden during




the 1950"s have greatly improved laundry cleaning efficiency. Po-



lyphosphates were totally dominating as complexing agents in the
                                 116

-------
detergents. In the end of the 1960"s the average phosphate con-



centration was about 35 % in cleaning agents and in some special



products the phosphate concentration could amount to more than



60 % (Kjellman, 1975).





In the middle of the 1960"s municipal sewage from urban areas



contained phosphorus corresponding to about 4 g P per person and



day. Approximately half of this amount originated from detergents



(Ahl et al., 1967). The general opinion that phosphorus was the



main agent causing eutrophication lead to investigations of dif-



ferent methods to reduce the phosphate concentration in detergents.



In order to comply with authorities different manufacturers dimi-



nished the amount of phosphates in their detergents. As can be



seen from Table 1 the use of phosphate in detergents diminished



from about 3.9«106 kg in year 1968 to about 2.65»106 kg in 1972,



corresponding to a decrease of 32 %. Due to the decrease of phos-



phate in detergents the phosphorus content in sewage diminished



to about 3.3 g P per person and day of which about 30 % originated



from detergents (Kjellman, 1975). The use of phosphorus in deter-



gents has increased a little after 1972.





The trisodium salt of NTA may be used as a partial substitute for



or a complement to sodium tripolyphosphate as builder in house-



hold detergents. NTA was introduced on the market at the end of



the 1960"s (see Table 1). Several studies were performed in order



to evaluate the biodegradability of NTA (Forsberg and Lindquist,



1967, Bouveng et al., 1968 and 1970, and Bjorndal et al., 1972).
                                 117

-------
The results obtained showed that aerobic biological processes



are capable of degrading NTA fairly efficient under normal con-



ditions of operation.  However,  different foreign reports, for




instance the Epstein report, raised some doubts that NTA could



be safely used without negative consequences on the environment.



These doubts lead to a decreased interest in using NTA in deter-



gents (National Swedish Environment Protection Board, 1970)  and



the use of NTA in detergents has decreased during the 1970~s.






CHOICE OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY FOR NUTRIENTS CONTROL



The first sewage works with chemical precipitation was built in




1961 in Aker, a small municipality with about 2,000 persons con-



nected to the sewage works. The treatment plant was equipped for



primary sedimentation with subsequent chemical precipitation whe-



re the floes were separated in a flotation unit. The chemical




precipitation agent was aluminium sulphate.






The sewage works in Aker was built before any significant research



had started in chemical precipitation. In the middle of the 1960"s



several research projects started on combined biological and che-



mical treatment of sewage. At that time the two processes which



were considered were simultaneous precipitation and post-precipi-



tation. Studies were performed in a laboratory scale, pilot plant



scale and as full scale experiments.






Early studies on the simultaneous precipitation process gave rat-



her high effluent values of total phosphorus. Pilot plant studies



with simultaneous precipitation with aluminium sulphate gave eff-
                                118

-------
luent values of total phosphorus of about 2 mg P/l (Balm§r et



al., 1968). Full scale tests at Eolshalls sewage works in Stock-



holm during a short test period showed effluent values of total



phosphorus of about 1-1.5 mg P/l. Addition of aluminium sulphate



caused a lower reduction of the BOD-values due to separation




problems in the final sedimentation basin (Cronholm,  1968). Ulm-



gren (1969) reports other full scale tests in which simultaneous



precipitation were studied giving high effluent values of total



phosphorus. Laboratory studies of the simultaneous precipitation



process, however, showed that it was possible to reach effluent




values of total phosphorus below 1 mg P/l (Ericsson,  1967).






Laboratory experiments with post-precipitation showed that an



effluent value could be reached of total phosphorus below 1 mg P/l



(Ericsson, 1967, and Weijman-Hane, 1968). Similar results were



obtained in evaluation of the first built sewage works with post-




precipitation (National Swedish Environment Protection Board,



1969) .






Based on the rather few experimental studies performed in Sweden



concerning chemical precipitation and foreign experiences for



instance in Switzerland the National Swedish Environment Protec-



tion Board strongly recommended post-precipitation instead of si-



multaneous precipitation as the removal method of phosphorus. In



1968 the expansion period began with chemical treatment plants



with the purpose of reducing as much as possible of the phospho-



rus content in wastewaters.
                                 119

-------
No significant interest was laid on nitrogen removal. However,



some research started in the middle of the 1960"s concerning



nitrogen removal, especially by use of biological methods




(Hultman, 1973, and Ericsson, 1975).






DESIGN GUIDELINES



To guide those who prepare or scrutinize proposals for treatment



plants the National Swedish Environment Protection Board  (1971)



prepared "Guidelines for design of sewage treatment plants". In




the guidelines the following are given: design values for sludge



loads on the activated sludge process, BOD loads on trickling



filters, detention time in flocculating units, surface loads in



sedimentation basins etc  (Ulmgren, 1975a).






EMISSION CONTROL




Instructions for emission control in Sweden have been issued by




the National Swedish Environment Protection Board  (1973). The



sampling frequency in relation to the required parameters total



BODj, total COD and total phosphorus is given in Table 2. In ad-



dition local authorities may demand more extensive emission cont-



rol and programs for recipient control.






STATE GRANTS



State grants are since 1st of July 1968 payable on certain con-




ditions for the construction, enlargement or alteration of sewage



purification plants, outfalls and, in some cases, intercepting



mains as well  (National Swedish Environment Protection Board,



1968) .
                                 120

-------
TABLE 1.  YEARLY CONSUMPTION OF RAW MATERIALS FOR WASHING,
          DISH-WASHING AND OTHER CLEANING MATERIALS USED  IN
          HOUSEHOLDS IN SWEDEN 1968-1972  (The consumption
          figures are given in thousand kilograms; 1 kg =
	2.205 Ib)  (Kjallman, 1965).	
Raw material
              Year

1968   1969   1970   1971   1972
Soap
Synthetic tensides
Phosphates
NTA
Other organic com-
plexing agents
1377
7500
3920
111
116
2037
7704
3644
1019
115
2624
7450
2855
1711
226
2597
7443
2797
1525
330
2766
8483
2650
1373
492
TABLE 2.  FREQUENCY OF SAMPLING IN EMISSION CONTROL
          (National Swedish Environment Protection Board/  1970)
Parameter
Person
equivalents (p.e.) connected to treatment plant
200-2000 2000-5000
COD(a)
BOD20000
4 /month
I/month
4 /month


                               121

-------
Grants are gauged according to degree of purification and are



payable at rates between 30 and 50 per cent of approved con-



struction costs (see Table 3). During the fiscal years 1971/72-



1973/74 grants were payable 25 per cent in excess of those rates



given in Table 3.  This formed a part of a programme to create



jobs (National Swedish Environment Protection Board, 1979a).



Grants given for different types of treatment are exemplified



in Table 4 based on rates in Table 3.





PRESENT SITUATION



The general policies for implementation of the Environment Pro-



tection Act on sewage treatment as developed in the end of the



1960*s has essentially been maintained. Thus, a combined biologi-



cal and chemical treatment of municipal wastewater is normally



prescribed. In certain relatively few cases, only biological or



only chemical treatment may be allowed. In localities with poor



recipient conditions in relation to the discharge complementary



treatment  (mainly post-filtration) is prescribed in addition to



biological and chemical treatment. Recently, requirements of nit-



rification has been prescribed for a sewage works in the Stock-



holm area. The main reason for this requirement is to diminish



the oxygen demand of the wastewater which may give rise to oxygen



deficit at the bottom of certain parts of the Stockholm archipe-



lago and thereby cause leakage of phosphorus from the bottom se-



diments. Thus, the requirement of nitrification is to prevent



phosphorus leakage and thereby according to the general view



decrease algal growth.
                                 122

-------
TABLE 3.  STATE GRANTS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER WORKS
	(National Swedish Environment Protection Board, 1968)

Percentage BOD-, pu-       Percentage phosphorus purifica-

rification effect         tion effect

                             <50       50-89      >90
                          Percentage grant:

      60-74                   30         35        40

      75-89                   30         35        45

        >90                   35         40        50
TABLE 4.  PERCENTAGE GRANTS FOR DIFFERENT PROCESS COMBINATIONS
	(National Swedish Environment Protection Board, 1969)


Process combination                  Percentage grant

Simultaneous precipitation                 35

Direct precipitation                       40

Post-precipitation                        45-50
                                 123

-------
Sewage purification facilities in Sweden have expanded very



quickly during the last decade (see Figure 1). In the beginning



of 1979 about 640 municipal wastewater treatment plants were ope-



rated with combined biological and chemical treatment correspon-




ding to about 72 % of the total amount of wastewater from urban



areas.






The dominating process combination is post-precipitation with a



share of more than 80 % calculated on the number of treatment




plants with chemical precipitation (see Table 5). However, some



of the largest sewage works, for instance in the Stockholm region,



use pre-precipitation or simultaneous precipitation.






Aluminium sulphate has been the dominating precipitation agent.



During the last years especially larger sewage works have changed




to iron salts (see Table 6). This depends on that the production




of ferric chloride from waste products has considerably lowered



the price of the chemical. Besides there are some benificial ef-



fects on the sludge properties in the use of iron salts compared



with aluminium sulphate.






EVALUATION OF NUTRIENTS CONTROL MEASURES






OPERATIONAL RESULTS



Several papers have been written on experiences of full scale



operations of chemical precipitation in Sweden  (Eklund, 1974,



Gronqvist et al., 1978, Hultman, 1978, Isgard and Ericsson, 1976,



and 1978, and Ulmgren, 1975a and 1975b). These papers discuss
                                 124

-------
    Percent of the population in urban areas(localities)
                               1979-01-01
100
                           1970
              1975
                                                                           Chemical
                                                                           treatment
                                                                      	Biological-
                                                                      71%| chemical
                                                                           treatment
                                                                           Complementary
                                                                     1,5%J treatment
                                                                           (filtration etc.)
            1980
   Type of sewage treatment
Number of
treatment plants
Number of persons
served
   No treatment
   Sedimentation
   Biological treatment
   Chemical treatment
   Bio. chemical treatment
   Complementary treatment
   156  (-34)
   380  (-37)
   141  (+  3)
   625  (+18)
    18  (+  2)
    7 000  (-   1 000)
  181 000  (-  21 000)
1 398000  (-110000)
  324000  (+  22000)
4833000  (+ 106000)
  107000  (+   7000)
                                        1 320 (-48)
  The figures in brackets refer to the change since January 1 st, 1978
                          6 850 000
            Figure 1.   Sewage Treatment  in  Sweden  1965-1979

                                        125

-------
TABLE 5.  DIFFERENT TYPES OF SEWAGE WORKS WITH CHEMICAL PRECIPI-
          TATION IN SWEDEN IN THE BEGINNING OF 1978
	(National Swedish Environment Protection Board, 1979b)
PROCESS COMBINATION:

Direct precipitation

Pre-precipitation

Simultaneous precipitation

Post-precipitation
NUMBER OF PLANTS

      138

       17

       35

      554
Post-precipitation systems;

     Trickling filters

     Activated sludge

     Separation of chemical floes
     by contact filtration

     Polishing by deep-bed filters
       49

      505


       11

       16
TABLE 6.  USE OF DIFFERENT PRECIPITATION AGENTS AT MUNICIPAL  SE-
          WAGE WORKS IN SWEDEN IN THE BEGINNING OF 1977 AND 1979
	(National Swedish Environment Protection Board,  1979b)

                    TYPE OF CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION AGENT:

Number of
plants
Aluminium
sulphate
600 (578)
Ferric & Lime
ferrous
iron
92 (60) 60 (48)
Iron
salts &
lime
26 (22)
Aluminium
sulphate &
iron salts
4 (3)
Percentage of
connected po-
pulation          49  (69)   42  (23)     5  (3)     2  (3)     2  (2)
Numbers from the beginning of 1977 are within brackets,
                                  126

-------
different process configurations, the influence of different ope-



rational parameters such as dosage, pH-value in the flocculation



step and type of chemical precipitation agent and the influence



of separation methods.





Data from the emission control at municipal sewage works shall be



sent to the National Swedish Environment Protection Board once a



year. Compilations of such data have been published by the Natio-



nal Swedish Environment Protection Board (1977 and 1979b). Obtai-



ned results for different treatment systems are shown in Table 7.



The results are compared in the table with expected results from



treatment plants with a good operation and no significant distur-



bances based on results reported by Gronqvist et al. (1978).





A large fraction of the Swedish municipal sewage works do not



operate reliably. Investigations of post-precipitation plants in-



dicate that effluent values of BOD- are not below 15 mg/1 (requi-



red limit)  for about 30 % of the plants and effluent values of



total phosphorus are not below 0.5 mg P/l (required limit) for



about 40 % of the plants (National Swedish Environment Protection



Board, 1977).





Full scale experiences of simultaneous precipitation plants in



the Nordic countries have been put together by Gronqvist and



Arvin (1979). It was shown that much better results could be ob-



tained for the treatment plants than results shown in Table 7.



The average concentration of total phosphorus from five simulta-



neous precipitation plants in the Stockholm area was 0.6 mg P/l.
                                 127

-------
TABLE 7.  OPERATIONAL RESULTS BY USE OF DIFFERENT CHEMICAL PRECI-
          PITATION METHODS
PROCESS COMBINATION





Direct precipitation
Pre-precipitation
Simultaneous preci-
pitation
Post-precipitation
OPERATIONAL RESULTS
IN 1977

ROD
±J\-/ LJ n
mg/1
39
35

28
10
(1)


tot
mg/1
0.70
0.98

1.48
0.53
EXPECTED RESULTS
FOR PLANTS WITH NO
SIGNIFICANT

BANCES (2)
Ptot' mg
-
0.5-0.

0.5-0.
0.5-1.
DISTUR-


/l

8

8
2 (3)
Post-precipitation
followed by deep-
bed filtration
0.22
                                                    0.2-0.4  (4)
0.15-0.3 (5)
Notes:   (1)  Average values from different plants. Data from
              National Swedish Environment Protection Board  (1979b)

         (2)  According to Gronquist et al.  (1978).

         (3)  Post-precipitation with aluminium sulphate at pH
              6.5-7.2 or lime in single stage at normal loaded
              plants.

         (4)  Post-precipitation with aluminium sulphate at pH
              5.5-6.4, with ferric chloride and recirculation of
              sludge to the aeration basin or with lime in single
              stage  at low loaded plants.

         (5)  Post-precipitation with aluminium sulphate at pH
              5.5-6.4.
                                128

-------
In order to elucidate the reasons of the unsatisfactory removal




efficiencies of certain sewage works an enquiry was sent in spring



1979 to the County Councils. These were requested to give their



opinion of the reasons for the unsatisfactory results of sewage



works with effluent values of BOD_ and total phosphorus above 15



mg/1 and 0.5 mg P/l, respectively. Several explanations were gi-



ven such as hydraulic problems, difficult industrial wastes and



unreliable machinery equipment. The percentage distribution of



reasons to unsatisfactory results is given in Table 8.






COSTS OF POST-PRECIPITATION PLANTS



The costs for post-precipitation plants based on average values



from different Swedish reports are put together in Table 9. The



capital costs are somewhat higher than the operating costs. Due



to increasing treatment costs for diminishing sizes of the sewage



works there is a tendency to centralize the wastewater treatment.



The grant system has promoted this development. The use of comple-



mentary treatment by deep-bed filtration will increase the total



costs for a post-precipitation plant 15-20 %.  Different cost



factors for the operating costs are shown in Table 10.






EFFECTS ON RECIPIENTS



In order to elucidate the effects of biological and chemical



treatment on the water quality in the recipient the National Swe-



dish Environment Protection Board started a program in 1972 for




analyzing the conditions in a number of different recipient lakes




(Forsberg et al., 1975).
                                 129

-------
TABLE 8.  CAUSES OF UNSATISFACTORY REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF POST-
	PRECIPITATION PLANTS (Carlsson and Nordstrom, 1979)
CAUSE

Hydraulic problems

Industrial wastes

Machinary equipment

Process technology

Maintenance

Repairs, reconstruction

Unreliable analysis  (1)

Unknown causes
PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, %

             18

             12

             19

             17

              2

              4

             17

             12
Note:  (1)  Probably depending on significant nitrification  in
            BOD-bottles during the BOD7~measurement.
                                 130

-------
TABLE 9.  APPROXIMATE COSTS FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT (1978).
Number of per-
son equivalents
(p.e.)
Costs for post-preci-
pitation plants (inclu-
ding sludge treatment)
                    Capital
                    costs
                      Skr
                    p.e.-year
             Operating
             costs
               Skr
             p.e.-year
Additional costs
for deep-bed filt-
ration
Capital     Operating
costs       costs
  Skr         Skr
p.e.-year   p.e.«year
2,000
5,000
20,000
50,000
130
100
60
45
100
70
50
40
—
25
10
7
—
8
4
3
Notes:     1 Skr = 0.24 US dollars
           In calculation of capital costs the annuity used is 10 %
           and 13 % for post-precipitation plants and deep-bed fil-
           ters, respectively.
           Average municipal water consumption is about 400 1 per
           person and day in Sweden.
TABLE 10.  OPERATING COSTS FOR POST-PRECIPITATION PLANTS  (INCLU-
           DING SLUDGE TREATMENT)  (1978)
COST FACTOR
Labour and administration
Chemicals
     For chemical precipitation
     For sludge conditioning
Energy
Sludge transportation
Other costs factors
                 PERCENTAL COSTS, %
                        30
                        25
                        (15)
                        (10)
                        20
                        10
                        15
                       Too
                                 131

-------
From the experiences of phosphorus removal positive responses



have been reported from some water bodies. In other lakes delayed



recovery has been observed after nutrient reduction. In some la-



kes, where the phosphorus load was reduced by 30-40 %, no marked



improvements were noted. The results available indicate that a



comparatively great change in phosphorus load must occur in or-



der to get significant improvement in water clarity in the lakes.



As the phosphorus load from treatment plants is often the domi-



nant phosphorus source, reduction of phosphorus by advanced treat-



ment seems to be a good tool for controlling eutrophication in



many lakes (Ryding, 1978a and 1978b).






TRENDS IN IMPROVEMENT OF CONTROL OF NUTRIENTS



The operating costs have steadily increased at Swedish sewage



works. Therefore great interest has been directed towards biolo-



gical-chemical treatment methods which can reduce the operating




costs and which are more efficient. Such methods include the use



of counterflow of precipitated sludges, two-step precipitation,



regulation of the alkalinity and automatic control.






For a constant value of the suspended solids in the effluent it



is advantageous to have a low fraction of phosphorus in the sus-



pended solids in order to obtain low effluent values of phospho-



rus. If the effluent concentration of suspended solids is 10 mg/1



and the fraction of phosphorus in the suspended solids 6 % and 2




% the effluent concentration of suspended phosphorus will be 0.6




and 0.2 mg P/l, respectively.
                                 132

-------
A suitable way to diminish the fraction of phosphorus in the sus-

pended solids is to decrease the influent phosphorus concentration

before the precipitation step. This technique has been tried in

full scale at several sewage works in Sweden. Different examples

are:
          Two-step precipitation at Balinge sewage works (Holm-
          strom, 1977)  by use of the combination of simultaneous
          precipitation and contact filtration in which process
          combination the principal part of phosphorus removal
          occurs in the simultaneous precipitation step after
          which still more phosphorus is removed by the addition
          of low concentrations of ferric iron before a deep-bed
          filter.

          Two-step precipitation at Kappala (Isgard and Ericsson,
          1978) and Bankeryd sewage works in which simultaneous
          precipitation is followed by post-precipitation.

          Recirculation of post-precipitated sludge to the aera-
          tion basin of the activated sludge process (Gronqvist
          et al., 1978). The phosphorus reduction in the biologi-
          cal step is hereby improved and the phosphorus concent-
          ration before the post-precipitation step will be much
          lower than if no recirculation takes place. Some preli-
          minary results indicate, however, that nitrification
          may be inhibited by recirculation of aluminium contai-
          ning post-precipitated sludges.

          Use of biological phosphorus reduction at Kristianstad
          sewage works by use of an anaerobic zone in the first
          part of the aeration basin. In this way the phosphorus
          concentration is diminished before the post-precipita-
          tion step.


These operational modifications of an existing post-precipitation

plant have shown very promising results including better removal

efficiencies of total phosphorus, lower total amount of chemical

precipitation agents and better sludge properties. It therefore

seems probable that a large fraction of the Swedish post-precipi-

tation plants will change to a modified operating scheme.
                                 133

-------
The alkalinity of the effluent from a biological step is mainly



determined by the influent alkalinity and the degree of nitrifi-



cation and denitrification. In nitrification the produced amount



of hydrogen ions reduces the alkalinity of the wastewater. This



reduction often leads to reduced requirements of aluminium sulp-



hate or lime in post-precipitation and several treatment plants



are operated in this way in Sweden (Ericsson et al., 1976, and



Gronqvist et al., 1978). Promising results have been shown by



regulation of the alkalinity of the effluent from an activated



sludge process by regulation of the degree of nitrification and



denitrification by the supply of oxygen (Olsson, 1980) .






SUMMARY



During the 1950's observations were made and the conclusion drawn



that the water quality in some lakes and coastal waters had dete-



rioted. Different recipient studies indicated that phosphorus was




the main factor which caused this deterioration. Some efforts were



made to decrease the phosphate concentrations in the synthetic de-



tergents and approximately a 30 % reduction of the phosphate



amount in synthetic detergents was obtained between 1968 and 1972.




In 1968 the expansion period began with chemical treatment plants



and in the beginning of 1979 about 640 municipal wastewater treat-



ment plants were operated with combined biological and chemical



treatment corresponding to about 72 % of the total amount of



wastewater from urban areas. At present a large interest has been



directed towards modified operating schemes in order to get bet-



ter removal efficiencies and savings in operating costs.
                                 134

-------
REFERENCES

Ahl, T. ,  Karlgren, L., Olsson, E. and Tullander, V.  (1967): Hus-
          hallsavloppsvattnet. Vatten, 23, 3, pp 178-204  (in
          Swedish).

Anonymous (1971): Eutrofieringsproblemet. Vatten, 27, 4, pp 463-
          465 (in Swedish).

Balmer, P.,  Blomquist, M. and Lindholm, M. (1968): Simultanfall-
          ning i en hogbelastad aktivslamprocess. Vatten, 24, 2,
          pp 112-116 (in Swedish).

Bjorndal, H., Bouveng, H.O., Solyom, P. and Werner, J.  (1972):
          NTA in sewage treatment. Part 3. Biochemical stability
          of some metal chelates. Vatten, 28, 1, pp 5-16.

Bouveng,  H.O., Davidsson, G. and Steinberg, E.-M.  (1968): NTA in
          sewage treatment. Vatten, 24, 4, pp 348-359.

Bouveng,  H.O., Solyom, P. and Werner, J.  (1970): NTA in sewage
          treatment. Part 2. Degradation of NTA in a trickling
          filter and an oxidation pond. Vatten, 26, 4, pp 389-402.

Carlsson, A. and Nordstrom, B. (1979): Orsaker till otillfreds-
          stallande reningsresultat vid kommunala avloppsrenings-
          verk.  National Swedish Environment Protection Board,
          SNV PM 1248 (in Swedish).

Cronholm, M.  (1968): Fosforreduktion medelst aluminiumsulfat vid
          Eolshalls reningsverk,  Stockholm. Vatten, 24, 2, pp 117-
          124 (in Swedish).

Eklund, L.  (1974): Bearbetning av resultat fran driftundersoknin-
          gar vid kommunala reningsverk. National Swedish Environ-
          ment Protection Board,  SNV PM 556  (in Swedish).

Ericsson, B.  (1967): Narsaltreduktion vid avloppsverk. Vatten, 23,
          2, pp 92-102 (in Swedish).

Ericsson, B.  (1975): Nitrogen removal in a pilot plant. J. Water
          Pollution Control Federation, 47, 4, pp 727-740.

Ericsson, B., Mard, G. and Akesson, M.  (1976): Drifterfarenheter
          med biologisk nitrifikation vid Orebro reningsverk.
          Vatten, 32, 3, pp 301-310  (in Swedish with an English
          summary).

Forsberg, C.  (1977): Nitrogen as a growth factor in fresh water.
          Prog.  Wat. Tech., Vol 8, Nos 4/5, pp 275-290.
                                 135

-------
Forsberg, C. and Lindqvist, G. (1967):  Experimental studies on
          bacterial degradation of nitrilotriacetate,  NTA. Vatten,
          23, 4, pp 265-277.

Forsberg, C. , Ryding, S.-O. and Claesson, A. (1975): Recovery of
          polluted lakes. A Swedish research program on the effects
          of advanced waste water treatment and sewage diversion.
          Water Research, 9, 1, pp 51-59.

Gronqvist, S. and Arvin, E. (1979):  Simultanfalining - erfaren-
          heter och FoU-behov. Nordforsk-prosjektet: Drift av
          renseanlegg, rapport 5  (in Swedish).

Gronqvist, S., Holmstrom, H.,  Hultman,  B. and Reinius, L.-G.  (1978)
          Experiences and process development in biological-che-
          mical treatment of municipal wastewaters in Sweden.
          Prog. Wat. Tech., Vol 10,  Nos 5/6, pp 701-713.

Hannerz, L. and Forsberg, C.  (1975): Eutrofieringssituationen i
          Sverige. Tionde nordiska symposiet om vattenforskning.
          Nordforsk, Miljovardssekretariatet, Publ. 1975:1  (in
          Swedish).

Holmstrom, H.  (1977): Simultanfallning och kontaktfiltrering vid
          Balinge reningsverk. Swedish Water and Waste Water Works
          Association, Rapport 1/77 (in Swedish with an English
          summary).

Hultman, B.  (1973): Biological nitrogen reduction studied as a ge-
          neral microbiological engineering process. In "Environ-
          mental Engineering." G. Lindner and K. Nyberg (Eds.),
          D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 264-275.

Hultman, B.  (1978): Chemical precipitation in Sweden - Present
          situation and trends in process improvement and cost
          reduction. Paper presented at 2nd International Congress
          of the Environment 4-8 Dec.  1978, Palais de Congres,
          Paris, France.

Isgard, E. and Ericsson, B. (1976):  Chemical and biological sewage
          treatment in Sweden. Effluent and Water Treatment Con-
          vention, Manchester 1976.

Isgard, E. and Ericsson, B. (1978):  A review of the Swedish situa-
          tion in combined wastewater treatment. Paper presented
          at "Colloque International 16-19 mai 1978, Traitement
          combine1 des eaux usees domestiques et industrielles."
          Universitg de LiSge - Section d'Environnement.

Johansson, K. and Karlgren, L. (1974):  Tusen sjoar. Rapport fran
          en inventering. National Swedish Environment Protection
          Board, Publ. 1974:11 (in Swedish).
                                 136

-------
Kjallman, A.  (1975) : Tvatt- och diskmedel som narsaltkalla. Tion-
          de nordiska symposiet om vattenforskning. Nordforsk,
          Miljovardssekretariatet, Publ. 1975:1  (in Swedish).

Lindahl, P.E.B. and Melin, R.  (1973): Algal assays of archipelago
          waters. Quantitative aspects. OIKOS, 24, pp 171-178.

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1968): Statsbidrag
          till avloppsreningsverk. Meddelande V  5  (in Swedish).

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1969): Experience
          of chemical purification. Publ. 1969:10 E.

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1970): Tvattmedel
          som miljoproblem. Publ. 1970:4 (in Swedish).

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1971): Dimensione-
          ring av kommunala reningsverk (in Swedish).

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1973): Utslapps-
          kontroll vid kommunala avloppsanlaggningar. Publ. 1973:
          16 (in Swedish).

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1977): Sewage treat-
          ment in built up areas in Sweden as at 1st January 1977.
          SNV PM 911 E.

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1979a): Water Pro-
          tection in Sweden. Bulletin, SNV PM 1153 E.

National Swedish Environment Protection Board (1979b): Avlopps-
          rening - tatorternas avloppsforhallande den 1 januari
          1979. Meddelande 4/1979 (in Swedish).

Olsson, G.  (1980): Automatic control in wastewater treatment
          plants. Trib. Cebedeau, Vol 33, N  436, pp 121-130.

Rodhe, W. (1978): Aktuella problem inom limnologin. Svensk Natur-
          vetenskap, pp 55-107 (in Swedish).

Ryding, S.-O.  (1978a): The significance of sewage effluent for the
          hydraulic and nutrient loads on lakes. Prog. Wat. Tech.,
          Vol 10, Nos 5/6, pp 907-916.

Ryding, S.-O.  (1978b): Research on recovery of polluted lakes.
          Loading, water quality and responses to nutrient reduc-
          tion. Acta Universitas Upsaliensis, Abstracts of Uppsala
          Dissertations from the Faculty of Science, 459.

Ulmgren, L.   (1969): Drifterfarenheter fran nagra reningsverk for
          narsaltreduktion. Vatten,  25, 2,  pp 140-145 (in Swedish).
                                 137

-------
Ulmgren, L. (1975a):  Experiences and results from chemical pre-
          cipitation of domestic waste water in full-scale
          plants. Prog. Wat. Tech., Vol 7, Nos 3/4, pp 409-416.

Ulmgren, L. (1975b):  Swedish experiences in chemical treatment
          of wastewater. J. Water Pollution Control Federation,
          47,  4, pp 696-703.

Weijman-Hane,  G. (1968): Narsaltreduktion. Vatten, 24, 2, pp 106-
          111 (in Swedish).
                                 138

-------
           ECONOMICAL AND EFFICIENT PHOSPHORUS CONTROL
            AT A DOMESTIC-INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PLANT

                          Doris Van Dam
            Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent
       Grand Haven - Spring Lake, Michigan Sewer Authority
INTRODUCTION

In 1968/  the Michigan Water Resources Commission (MWRC) issued

orders for phosphorus and other pollutant reductions to commun-

ities and industries whose wastes were being discharged to the

waters or tributaries of the Great Lakes by December 1972.  The

MWRC adopted its standard from the Federal State Conference on

the pollution of Lake Michigan and its tributary basin held in

Chicago,  Illinois in March 1968.


The response at Grand Haven and Spring Lake, Michigan, located

on the sandy coast where the Grand River enters Lake Michigan,

was to form a combined sewer authority and build a new central

treatment plant.  The plant was designed not only to process

domestic wastes, but also to receive a substantial contribution

from the Eagle Ottawa Leather Co., a chrome and vegetable tan-

ner of 12,000 hides per week and a principal employer in the

Grand Haven - Spring Lake area.   (Figure 1).


It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the special challen-

ges the merged waste flow posed to design and subsequent opera-

tion of the treatment plant.  How concentrated side streams,

such as heat treatment supernatants, must be considered in over-

all plant efficiency is discussed.  The techniques used to control
                                139

-------
                                                                   c
                                                                   (0
                                                                03
                                                                C  C
                                                               •H    0)
                                                                ns  -P
                                                                DC  (0
                                                                   ?
                                                                T3  0)
                                                                C  4J
                                                                rO  y)
                                                                M  (0
                                                                O  J5
                                                                0)
                                                                !u
                                                                D
                                                                cn
140

-------
phosphorus at a very low cost are presented.  A summary of sev-



eral years of plant efficiency and cost figures accompany the text.





BACKGROUND



The MWRC requirements called for an 80 percent removal of phos-



phorus for Grand Haven, Spring Lake, and the Eagle Ottawa Leather



Co., as well as combined maximums from all three sources of 1,126



pounds per day  (511.2 kg) of BOD, and 30 mg/1 of suspended solids.





At the time, Grand Haven, population 10,500, was served by an out-



dated primary treatment plant, Spring Lake, population 3,034, em-



ployed an overloaded Imhoff tank, and Eagle Ottawa Tannery efflu-



ent was simply screened before discharge to the Grand River.





To meet the requirements, the newly-formed joint district construct-



ed a single 5.0 mgd (18,925 cu m/day)  activated sludge plant.  The



plant went on line in November, 1973,  and 1978-1979 average con-



tributions from the three sources were 2.1 mgd (7,759 cu m/day)



from Grand Haven, 0.4 mgd (1,476 cu m/day) from Spring Lake, and



0.8 mgd (3,179 cu m/day) from Eagle Ottawa (Figure 2 ).





Although tannery wastes have amounted to just 26 percent of treat-



ment plant flow, they represent 81 percent of total influent BOD,



and 80 percent of influent suspended solids.  The tannery waste



contains in mg/1 60 sulfides, 34 chromium, 57 ammonia, 2911 CODf



and a total nitrogen as N of 106 (Figure 2 ).





The treatment plant employs grit removal, phosphorus removal, pri-



mary clarification, activated sludge and chlorine contact; solids




are conditioned thermally prior to vacuum filtration (Figures).
                                141

-------
H
S
            Q
            O
            U
            CO
            to
Cn
g
                  r-
                  (N
                   Cn

                            CN
         tn
                                   Cn
                                   g

                                  vo
                                  O
                                                                       W
                                                    U
 Cn
 g

^<
CO
                                                                                                       00
w
to
w
U
UJ*
K
1
<

S
§
W
^

<
ffi


rH
H \
^x D^
8 1 e
CQ *^D
*^J* ^H
(Tl CM
rH



>H
J
Z
0

>H
«
W

2j
EH


KC
H
2
0

§
S3
H W
\ O
tji [2
g rtj
p4
r-
in M
CJ

                                                                             CM
                                                                                    U
                                                                                    •r-l
                                                                                    0)
                                                                                    -p
                                                                                    U
                                                                                    (0
                                                                                    M
                                                                                    (0
                                                                                    £!
                                                                                    CJ

                                                                                    -P
                                                                                    c
                                                                                    OJ
                                                                                    3
O
                      td
                               (0
            Q
            O
            S
   O

   m
   n
   CM
oo
 •  3
o  u
                                                        Q
                                                        H
                                                        CM
                                                        to
                                                              o
                                                              VD
                                                                       w
                                                                       o
                                                     S3
                                                     OJ
                                                  CM
                                                  rH
                                                   I
                                                  CO
                         CN


                          OJ
                          !J
                          3
                          cn
                   cu ^
                   H to
                   U  I
                   H S3
                   2 O
            EH
            EH
            O

         « H
         W K)

         s <;
         < w
                                       142

-------
Ul

I

H ui
I E
= 5
u
t
AERATION
TANKS

PRIMARY
CLARIFIERS
4
^1

SLUDGE 1
i
Ul
O
O ^
wt
f
I
p
£§
5-
J
Ul '
Ii
i
1

                                                                                          cn
                                                                                         •H
                                                                                         £
                                                                                          U
                                                                                         • H
                                                                                         2

                                                                                           «. 4-)
                                                                                          cu  c
                                                                                         x  to
                                                                                          01 -I-J
                                                                                          c  c
                                                                                         •H  0
                                                                                          SJ  S
                                                                                          0.4J
                                                                                         en  (0
                                                                                              OJ
                                                                                          03 ±J
                                                                                          D3 (C
                                                                                             ^
                                                                                          13 d>
                                                                                          C -U
                                                                                          ns w
                                                                                          ^ (C
                                                                                          ro
                                                                                          3
                                                                                          cn
 II
                          143

-------
All domestic flow is comminuted prior to reaching the grit tank.



Eagle Ottawa wastes are screened at the tannery.  Grit collected



on the bottom of a square, aerated-type grit collector is removed



by means of an air lift pump from the hoppered end of the tank.



Grit is washed by means of a mechanical inclined screw mechanism.





Ferrous sulfate for phosphorus removal is added to the total flow



in the rapid mix tank located in the grit building.





Air flocculcation is provided in the primary clarifiers for poly-



mer flocculation.





The plant includes three 60-foot (18.29 m) diameter, primary clari-



fiers, 200,000 gallon (757 cu m) capacity each.  The three aeration



tanks have a total capacity of 1,700,000 gallons (6,434.5 cu m), and



and are equipped with duo-spargers and coarse bubble diffusion.



The aeration tanks are arranged so that the activated sludge pro-



cess can be operated in one of four modes:  conventional, complete



mix, step aeration, or contact stabilization.  Air is provided by



four centrifugal blowers, each having a capacity of 5,200 cubic



feet  (145.6 cu m) per minute.





The three final clarifiers are the same size as the primaries, and



are equipped with suction-type sludge removal mechanisms.  The chlo-



rine contact tank has been constructed to provide two separated tanks



with gates so that either tank may be isolated for cleaning.





Effluent water is used for lawn sprinkling, the incinerator scrubber,



filter belt wash, foam suppression, line flushing, thickener, and



chlorinators.
                                144

-------
Return sludge pumps are 20 hp  (14.914 kw) , and can provide 100



percent return sludge capacity.  Sludge from primary clarifiers



is drawn off from a sump at the center of the clarifier by means



of positive displacement pumps, and pumped directly to two 45-



foot (13.716 m) diameter, 20-foot  (6.096 m) deep covered thicken-



ing tanks, with total capacity of 1,000,000 gallons (3,785 cu m) ,



or 28,000 pounds (12,712 kg) per day of solids.





After thickening, sludge is processed through a wet oxidation unit



where it is thermally conditioned at a rate of 68 gallons (257.38



liters) per minute.  Sludge is first ground in one of two grinders



which are piped in parallel to insure operation if one is out of



service.





Air is supplied by a 50 hp  (37.29 kw), 134 scfm (3.75 cu m/min)



§ 500 spig  (35.15 kg/sq cm) compressor, and the sludge-air mix-



ture is pumped to reactor pressure of 306 psig (21.51 kg/sq cm) by



a high pressure positive displacement ram-type pump.  The material



is fed through stainless steel heat exchangers to a stainless steel-



clad reactor.  A steam boiler maintains reactor temperature at 385°F



(195.9°C).  A standby boiler, and a second high pressure pump, pro-



vide backup capability.





Oxidized sludge is decanted in a separate tank and dewatered on



one of two cloth-covered, 370 square foot  (34.37 sq m) vacuum fil-



ters.  When the incinerator is bypassed, sludge cake is hauled to



landfill or used on agricultural land.





Plant performance has averaged 96 percent BOD removal, 76 percent



COD removal, 96 percent suspended solids reduction, 88 percent
                                145

-------
phosphorus removal, and chromium reduction of 96 percent (Figure 4 )






SPECIAL PROBLEMS - LOCATION/ODORS



Inclusion of tannery wastes in the new treatment plant created con-



ditions which required special consideration from the very first.






Because the hair, lime and grease in tannery wastes tend to clog



sewer lines unless there is adequate sewer dilution or primary



treatment prior to discharge into sewers, plant siting became a



crucial decision.  To minimize the anticipated difficulties in



moving tannery effluent over longer distances, the new treatment




plant was situated within the city limits of Grand Haven, immed-



iately sputh of the Eagle Ottawa plant.  The location is in a semi-



residential neighborhood, and special provisions for odor control



have had to be implemented.






In the original scheme, all usual odor-producing areas (grit and



screening building, decant tank, thickeners, vacuum filters) were




covered.  The areas are vented and odors drawn off to the inlet



of the aeration blowers and solubilized in the mixed liquor.






Because of equipment failures and the tannery contribution, how-



ever, odor problems unforeseen originally have required extraord-



inary odor control techniques.





TREATABILITY




Treatability of the tannery-domestic waste mixture was a second



important question.  Pilot studies verified the effectiveness of



the activated sludge method, provided the chromium content of pri-



mary effluent could be reduced to approximately 5 mg/1 to avoid
                                146

-------
   I
<#> o
                     10
                           VO
                    VD
                    CTl
     00
     00
                                              VD
S5
H
«
PM
CO

2!

g
Q


O
            EH
            2!
            W;

            P
            CM
            CM
            W
               oo
               CN
                           VO
                                               CN
£81

H
         CM
         CO
CM
n
                                                                              c
                                                                              o
                                                                              •H
                                                         o
                                                        •H
                                                                                4J  I
                                                                                C oo
                                                                                (0 r~
                                                                                r-\ 
                                                                                CU H

                                                                                rH  fl
                                                                                rH  tP
                                                                                (C  ro
                                                                                ^  M
                                                                                0)  0)
                                                                                >  >
                                                                                O <


                                                                                  •
                                                                                'Si1

                                                                                0)
                                                                                u
                                                                                3
                                                                                CTi
                                                                                •H
                                                                                fc.
                       •d
                        in
                       Q
                       o
                 Q
                 8
                                    to
                                                o
                               147

-------
toxicity in the biological phase.  This was achieved by blending



lime from the tannery's beamhouse to aid in the precipitation of



chromium hydroxide.  The addition of sodium hydroxide to the tan-



nery waste prior to its combination with the domestic flow is also



possible.  This has rarely been necessary, however, except for a




period during a strike when the tannery was operating with limited



staff and not using the beamhouse to full capacity.






Since the tannery wastes are discharged on a batch basis, with pH



ranging from 3 to 12, an equalization tank was incorporated into



the system to hold tannery efflyent and create an acceptable pH




level of 8.5 to 9.0.






In addition, the system is designed so that all tannery wastes



can be taken into one primary tank, exclusive of domestic wastes,



and treated separately, should that become necessary.






SIDESTREAM RECYCLE




A great deal has been said about the supernatant decant liquor



which is returned from thermally conditioned sludge to the treat-



ment plant.  Sidestream treatment should be studied in light of



purpose and design of the total solids handling system and the



fate of solids throughout.






Let us deal with solids first.  While thermal conditioning is high-



ly successful in making the difficult-to dewater sludge easily de-




waterable, it also solubilizes a portion of the raw suspended sol-



ids. At the same time, a relatively small amount, approximately 5



percent, of oxidation of volatile solids occurs, due to the addi-



tion of air in the thermal conditioning system.
                                148

-------
Supernatant recycle, of course, is another concern.  After condi-




tioning, the oxidized sludge flow enters the decant tank, where it



thickens before it is sent to the vacuum filter for dewatering.




The decant supernatant, a relatively clear liquid resulting from



the thickening process, is decanted and returned to the aeration



tanks for treatment.  While its suspended solids concentration is



only, 2460 mg/1, its COD, 8005, and P concentrations are 22, 320



mg/1, 9370 mg/1 and 45 mg/1 respectively, due to the solubilized



dissolved volatile solids.  It constitutes the major biological



solids handling sidestream load on the plant.  It also has some



phosphorus load.  Additional capacity and operational flexibility



were designed into our secondary system to allow for adequate




treatment of the solids handling recycle streams.






PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL



A chemical mixing, feeding and distribution system was provided to



provide chemical removal of phosphorous in the wastewater stream.




It was planned that the chemicals used for phosphorous removal



would include ferric chloride and polymer.






Ferric chloride would be delivered by truck and transferred to two



10,000 gallon (37,850 1) storage tanks located adjacent to the chem-



ical feed room underground outside the control building.





Because the concentrations of ferric chloride delivered to the



plant would vary from 38 percent to 45 percent during winter and



summer months respectively,  the operator had flexibility as to how




to store and feed the ferric chloride.  A dilution system was in-




 stalled so that a constant  dilution could be fed throughout the
                                 149

-------
year if desired.  Non-potable water could be added to the storage



tank along with air mixing from the bubbler system to provide the



desired diluted concentration.  Should the operator not desire to



dilute the concentration, as is the case with waste pickle liquor




currently used, the solution can be fed directly from the storage



tanks to the plant.






A bubbler system was incorporated in the design to measure the




level in both ferric chloride tanks.






Positive displacement metering pumps were provided to meter the




iron solution to the various feed points which consisted of the




rapid mix tank, inlet and outlet of primaries and aeration tanks,



and inlet of the final settling tanks.  Metering pumps were elec-



tronically paced from the main plant master flow meter.  A stand-



by iron solution pump was also included.  The solution from the



pumps flows to a rotameter distribution panel where it can be




distributed throughout the plant.






It was designed for polymer to be delivered to the plant in dry



form.  An automatic mixer and dispenser were provided to meter the



polymer solution to the various feed points.  As in the case of



the iron solution, the feed pumps were paced from an SCR controller



which in turn was paced from the main plant master flow meter.  The



rotameter panel for polymer was also provided for distribution



throughout the plant.  This panel would split only the diluted poly-



mer.






Numerous programs of varying chemical concentration and feed points



for phosphorous removal were conducted  (Figure 5).  In March 1974
                                150

-------

























































>H

O
ft








































• •
CO
^
CM
rtj
i
K


1 CO
S hi EH
W H O W
PS CM EH
H H .
ft EH hi S
S O O
EH hi O EH H
rt! < EH
2 CO <*P rij
P (-H « 0 K
pr*| pr | p^ ^1 M
Q H >H hi
P^ |_^ |_^ cW^ Pi
W O O o D
CM ft ft ^o P


H H n
oo r~ cri
H CN (N
^ ». «.
H rH rH
W <«- W

CN n ro
H rH rH


in CN oo
0 • •
in in T
rH t- 0>
CN H rH
• • •
o o o
H n rr
O kO CN
00 00 f~
U H
PS P; >H
H
VX PH
CN W

(I) 2
CM <
EH
P
^
1^ •
CO
PS W
§ rtj
>H EH
O hi
ft (<
|2;
EH H
H CM
ft O
CO EH


CTl
00
CTi
^
H
•w-

r-
o


oo
•
on
rH
CN
•
O
00
on
CO
W

%







co
D
O

PH
W
CM

K
O
h-5
o
H
l_3

W

X
CJ
H
ft
w
EH
CO
<

^
H
s

(_^
w
w
EH
CO


H
00
m




en
o

^
•
^



o


rH
^
in u
r^ p;
CTi  v> v>

CTi < — 1 CT1
O H O

CN CXI H
• • •
in m vo



o o o


on oo ^"
^t ^J" VD
H W
PS >H 2
ft < D























U)

fO

o
tl
f-t
ft

rH
5
o
HI
MX
(5

m
UJ
3

.c
CU
CO
o
ft


^
in
OJ
;j
m
•H
DM














151

-------
ferric chloride was applied to the rapid mix tank, and polymer to



the final sedimentation tank influent.  Ferric chloride in the a-



mount of 8.01 nvg/1 as Fe and polymer in the amount of 0.21 mg/1



was applied at a cost of $1,181.  Influent phosphorous was 5.5 mg/1



and the final effluent 1.2 mg/1.





In April the polymer was again used in the influent to final sed-



imentation only, with the ferric chloride split, adding 60 percent



to the rapid mix tank and 40 percent to the final sedimentation



influent with no apparent improvement in phosphorus removal.  Ferric



chloride in the amount of 8.63 mg/1 as Fe and polymer in the amount



of 0.17 mg/1 was applied at a cost of $1,271.  Influent phosphorous



was 5.2 mg/1 and final effluent 1.3 mg/1.





This mode of operation was continued in May and again with no ap-



parent improvement in phosphorus removal.





In June both the polymer and ferric chloride were split with two-



thirds of the chemicals added to the rapid mix and one-third to the



influent to final sedimentation.  Although the final effluent phos-



phorous concentration was lower at 0.7 mg/1, it should be noted



that the influent phosphorus was also lower at 3.8 mg/1.  The a-



mount of ferric chloride used was 8.38 mg/1 as Fe and polymer ap-



plied was 0.21 for a total chemicals cost of $1,989.  The diluted



phosphorous concentration in the influent was due to heavy precip-



itaion and river water backflow.  This condition was corrected



shortly thereafter.  Perhaps the impact of the tannery coming on



line May 28, 1974 may also have helped in phosphorus removal.  How-



ever, the tannery was on limited operation at that time and were
                                 152

-------
buying some of the hides in the blue, which reduced beamhouse lime




waste.






It was apparent that neither split feed, nor chemicals added to the



final sedimentation influent were as effective as adding the total



iron solution to the rapid mix tank prior to primary sedimentation.



Removals were excellent either with or without polymer addition.




It would follow that polymer use was discontinued and the iron



solution added to the rapid mix tank.






After several months of operation with ferric chloride we were con-



tacted by several companies who were contracted to remove waste




pickle liquor from the steel mills in Gary, Indiana.  We were able



to purchase the waste pickle liquor for less than the cost of com-



mercial ferric chloride.  This has been used for over five years



to date.  It has been equally as effective in phosphorus removal



as was ferric chloride.






Also shown on the lower portion of Figure 5 is 1975 data for the



same months as reported in 1974 for comparison.  In March 1975



ferrous sulfate in the amount of 4.1 mg/1 as Fe at a cost of $381



was applied to the influent containing 4.6 mg/1 of phosphorus and



resulted in a final effluent phosphorus content of 0.9 mg/1.






In April $352 was spent to apply 4.3 mg/1 of ferrous sulfate as



Fe to an influent containing 5.2 mg/1 of phosphorous which resulted



in a final effluent containing 0.9 mg/1 of phosphorus.






In May $402 spent for 4.8 mg/1 of Fe applied to an influent con-



taining 5.8 mg/1 of phosphorus resulted in a final effluent of 1.1



mg/1 of phosphorus.






                                153

-------
In June $542 was spent for 6.4 mg/1 of Fe applied to an influent


containing 6.1 mg/1 of phosphorus resulting in an effluent con-


taining 0.9 mg/1 of phosphorus.



It would appear from the data shown in Figure 6 , which shows the


iron used for phosphorus removal, that waste pickle liquor was


actually more effective than ferric chloride in that the amount


applied in milligrams per liter went from 9.3 in 1974-1975 to 6.6


in 1975-1976.  We would propose/ however, that the increasing load


from the Eagle Ottawa Leather Co. resulted in much more lime from


their beamhouse operations being discharged to the treatment plant,


which aided in the decrease in the amount of iron required for phos-


phorus removal.
                             I


To support that theory, Figure  7  shows the amount of flow from


the tannery and the amount of iron applied for phosphorus removal


for the same period of time.  As the amount of tannery waste in-


creased, the amount of iron necessary to control phosphorus removal


decreased.  The tannery flow went form 190 mg  (719,150 cu m) in


1974-1975 to 307 mg  (1,161,995 cu m) in 1978-1979.  The iron ap-


plied to the total plant flow decreased from 9.3 mg/1 to 1.6 mg/1.



On May 18, 1978 the tannery discontinued the use of the million


gallon equalization tank that had been in use prior to that time


for equalizing the flow to the wastewater treatment plant.  Follow-


ing this, the tannery added more lime to their discharge during


periods of dump from the tanhouse portion of their operation.  In


the tanhouse operation, a pickling process brings the hides to an


acid condition in preparation for tanning.  This waste has a low pH.
                                 154

-------









vO
£
S

to
P
PH
o
S3 

                                                              cu
                                                              i-l
                                                              3
                                                              Cn
155

-------

s
o
fa
Q 0
W EH EH
H*"9
|C_i
• T — _l ^t*
M i~1 W<
Q} fl) tJ) P-t
fa <; g
a
EH
O
EH




J EH
fa 5, 2 IS
O EH < O
O h3 rl





^H
OH
H
2

!5j
EH
1 T
rtj 3 IS •
2 EH O O
EH H fa S
EH
O
1
W

u
a.














Q
W
CO
'D
CO
*  vo vo T rH H
S
H
^
M
s
o
S
W
EH
a
w
VD ro r^ r^ o^ tC
	 EH
^* CT> CO rH in
rH rH CM CM CM
Q
D
H
EH
2
O
U
CO
H
Q

vo r^ in in CM w
VO ^< rH 00 r^ CO
•^ H in in ro ^D
o o vo o^ r» ^
ON vo vo m o 2
rH CM CM CM CO 2
EH

g
O
H
EH
rt]
N
H
a
D
O

fn |S EH EH EH co
O O 0 0 O i^
EH EH EH EH EH <^
i
in vo r~ oo a\
t** r*"- r~- Is* c~- >i
1 1 1 I 1  r» *

























•
W
C5
Oi
<|
ffi
U
CO
H
Q

S
W
2
^
J2
EH

in
EH

^
H
W
a

p
EH
P
U

P
EH
                                                          (C
                                                          EH

                                                          03
                                                          S
                                                          03
                                                          4J
                                                          4J
                                                          O
                                                           I
                                                          Q)
                                                          rH
                                                          CT>
                                                          ITJ
                                                           OJ
                                                           ^4
                                                           3
                                                           cn
                                                          •H
156

-------
Further documentation in regard to the relationship between volume
of tannery flow and phosphorous removal at the treatment plant for
January and February of 1979 as compared to 1980 is as follows:  In
January 1979 the tannery flow was 24.65 mg and 2.21 mg/1 of Fe was
fed resulting in final effluent phosphorus of 0.6 mg/1.  To compare,
in January 1980 the tannery flow was only 13.857 and 6.65 mg/1 of
Fe resulted in final effluent phosphorus being 0.6 mg/1.  In Feb-
ruary 1979 the tannery flow was 27.424 mg, no Fe feed was required,
and the final effluent phosphorus was 0.5 mg/1.  However, in Feb-
reary 1980 the tannery flow was only 18.494 mg and 4.89 mg/1 of
Fe was applied which resulted in final effluent phosphorus concen-
tration of 0.7 mg/1.

SUMMARY
This domestic-industrial activated sludge wastewater plant with
approximately 18 percent of the total flow emanating from a chrome
tanner and 80 percent of the suspended solids and BOD, has achieved
excellent purification.  Suspended solids and BOD removals have con-
sistently been above 90 percent.  The final effluent phosphorus con-
centration has been under 1.0 mg/1 with removal over 80 percent.
This excellent phosphorus purification has been accomplished with
pickle liquor, all added prior to primary sedimentation, and without
a flocculating aid.  Although phosphorus removal was successful with
limited amounts of iron application when the tannery waste was pre-
sent in considerable amount, it was necessary to add much larger a-
mounts of iron solution when the tannery waste was limited or off
entirely.  Simple laboratory control has been practiced with analyses
made on the daily composite sewage samples, and iron feed adjusted
based on the prior day's operating results.
                                 157

-------
a
EH
O
EH

*
CM

W

a
52
H
FM




EH
52
W
ID



a




EH
^
w
g
H
J2
3









EH
§
,_3
ft

(_3
<
EH
O
EH





S3
pr"!
s




a
EH
EH





i_^
•^
EH
§












S3
§

dp
CO
Q

J3
0
ft

rH
vx
Cn
e

CJP




CO
Q



C^
Cn
g
CO
Q
2*

ft

rH
cn
g









^r CN in oo oo in
00 00 00 00 00 00


^ rH rH < ITl *f VO




cn o\ oo r**- v»o oo
• 0 • • • •
o o o o o o

CO m CN rH rH VD
ro ro ro ^* ^ ro




rp ^r rH O r~ O
CN oo o in m o
^* ro f^s ^* ^* ^^
n n m CN CN n

r- r- ^ m c* -*
• 0 • • 0 •
m n ro n CM co

o m vo H VD ^<
vo f*o CN ^ in o
rH rH "er VO rH r^
in in ^ *. « xi.

vo in in in o •*
0 t f 0 t 0
in in in in in m

• 0 0 • • O4

H U
in vo t^ oo ^ rf
7 T 7" 7" i !> w
^j* in vo r — oo i — i ^
t*- t~- t*> f- r~ pti rf]
                                                          (1)
                                                          cn
                                                          (0

                                                          a;
                                                          CO
                                                         ft
                                                          3
                                                          i-i

                                                          O
                                                          w
                                                          o
                                                         x:
                                                         ft
                                                          (0
                                                         .p
                                                          o
                                                         EH
                                                         oo


                                                          0)
                                                          M
                                                          3
                                                          cn
158

-------
              THE PHOSTRIP PROCESS FOR  PHOSPHORUS  REMOVAL

                                    By

                            Mr.  Carl J.  Heim
                        Assistant Staff  Engineer
                        Union Carbide Corporation
                             Linde Division
                           Tonawanda, New  York
INTRODUCTION

     The PhoStrip process is a combined biological-chemical process for the

removal of phosphorus from wastewater.  The process works by concentrating

the phosphorus in the wastewater through biological means into a small sub-

stream, to which chemicals  are added for precipitation  of the concentrated

phosphorus.  Normally lime  is used for phosphorus precipitation  because the

quantity of lime required is proportional to the flow being treated rather than

the phosphorus concentration in that flow.  Thus, if the phosphorus in the

wastewater is concentrated into a substream that is 15% of the entering waste-

water flow, the amount of lime required would be only 15% of the  lime required

to treat the entire wastewater flow.

     In addition to drastically reducing the chemical requirement  for phosphorus

removal, the  PhoStrip process also produces relatively  small quantities of

chemical sludge. Phosphorus is precipitated in a separate reactor in the

process and the resulting chemical sludge does not contain.significant bio-

logical solids.  This sludge  is inert and stabilization (such as digestion) is

not required prior to disposal. When lime is used for phosphorus precipitation,

a very easily dewatered sludge is produced.  The net results are  very substantial

savings in  both chemical costs and sludge disposal costs.


                                159

-------
DESCRIPTION OF THE PHOSTRIP PROCESS




    A flow schematic of the PhoStrip process is shown in Figure 1.  In the




process, return sludge is mixed with plant influent and aerated exactly as in




a conventional activated sludge system.  While under aeration,  the micro-




organisms have the capability of removing essentially all of the soluble phos-




phorus from the wastewater because of special conditioning received in the




PhoStrip process.  The phosphorus removed in the  aeration  basin is incorporated




into the sludge in the form of stored polyphosphates.  The phosphorus content




of the sludge leaving the aeration basin can be more than twice  that of sludge




from a conventional system.  Removals of biological oxygen demand and sus-




pended solids in the aeration system are unaffected by PhoStrip.




    The phosphorus-laden sludge is separated from the phosphorus-free effluent in




the secondary clarifier.  The  sludge withdrawn with the clarifier underflow is then




either sent directly back to  the aeration basin, wasted from the system (excess




biological sludge quantities are not affected by the PhoStrip process) or sent to




a stripper tank, where it is held under anoxic conditions for several hours.




While under anoxic conditions, the microorganisms release their stored phospho-




rus in soluble form.  The released phosphorus is "washed" from the sludge blanket




by an elutriation stream and withdrawn as a supernatant from the stripper  tank.




This supernatant stream is then fed to a reactor-clarifier where the phosphorus




is precipitated with lime.  Typically,  the supernatant flow  is 10-20% of the influent




flow. Therefore, as explained previously, lime requirements are reduced by
                                     160

-------
Influent
                     Aeration
                      Basin
             Direct Recycle
                    Reactor-
                    Clarifier
                                 Supernatant
                                                                       Effluent
                                                        \
                                                                       Waste
                                                                       Sludge
                                                          Stripper Feed
 Anoxic
Stripper
  Tank
                            Elutriation Stream
                         Waste Chemical Sludge
                                Stripper Underflow
                 Figure 1.   Phostrip  System  Flow Schematic


                                      161

-------
80-90% and chemical sludge quantities are also reduced. The inert chemical




sludge is withdrawn from the bottom of the reactor-clarifier.  The overflow




from the reactor-clarifier, which has a relatively low phosphorus concentration,




is used as the elutriation stream.




     Sludge is withdrawn from the bottom of the anoxic stripper tank at the same




rate as it is fed to the tank to avoid solids  buildup.  This sludge is returned




to the aeration basin where phosphorus uptake is resumed.




     The PhoStrip process typically produces an effluent with a total phosphorus




concentration of 0.5-1.0 mg/1.  The effluent  soluble phosphorus concentration




normally ranges from 0.1-0.5 mg/1.  The PhoStrip process operates over the




normal range of activated sludge system operating conditions and can be used




with either air or oxygen activated sludge systems.








THEORY
    Biochemical Aspects




    The biochemical phenomemon responsible for the PhoStrip process has not




been fully defined.  Results of experimental work have led .to the formulation




of the following mechanisms for the observed phenomenon.




    Organisms containing high intracellular phosphate concentrations have




been isolated from wastewater treatment systems exhibiting high phosphorus




removal rates.  Typical of these  isolates are organisms of the genus Acineto-




bacter.    The  organisms  of this genus have demonstrated the ability to take
                                    162

-------
up and release phosphorus as a function of the aerobic-a noxic cycle, while


in pure culture form.  The interior of the cells have been characterized as


containing very large volutin (polyphosphate) granules while under aerobic


conditions. The  size of these granules diminished as the culture was main-


tained in an anoxic environment.  This indicates a transfer of phosphorus


from the volutin granules into solution.  These particular organisms are so


abundant in activated sludge systems that the Water Research Centre Labora-


tory at Stevenage, England, has utilized pure cultures to simulate activated


sludge systems.  These  organisms are also obligate aerboes preferring  Krebs


cycle  intermediates and acetates as substrates for metabolism.


    It is believed that the anoxic period  of the PhoStrip process forces these


strict aerobes to  undertake a sequential  series of reactions which result in


their forming polyphosphate granules while in the  aerobic period. This results


in a set of aerobic organisms that can compete more effectively with facultative


organisms in a cyclic aerobic-anoxic environment. The polyphosphate  granules


within the cell may provide phosphorus and energy to convert ADP to ATP during

                                                                     (2  3)
the anoxic period through the catalysis of the polyphosphokinase enzyme . '


Substitution of polyphosphate for ATP in biochemical reactions during anaero-

                       (4)
biosis is also possible.     (A third potential pathway of phosphorus release


utilizing the phosphatase enzyme has not yet been delineated.)


    In the first mechanism, conversion of ATP to ADP during the anoxic period


results in the  release of phosphorus from  the cell  as well as providing a source


of energy.  This energy is utilized by the obligate aerobes to continue  some of


their metabolic functions.  The fact that the addition of acetates increases the
                                     163

-------
rate of phosphorus release suggests an interaction between these organisms




and the facultative microbes present in activated sludge.  Under anoxic condi-




tions,  the facultative aerobes produce acetates which enhance the rate of phos-




phorus release by the oligate aerobes.  When the sludge leaves the  anoxic




environment and enters aerobic conditions, the ATP content within the cell




is low  because the reaction of ATP—>• ADP + P is a high rate reaction relative




to the formation of ATP from polyphosphates.




    In the  second, direct substitution mechanism,  the energy of the poly-




phosphate-phosphorus bond is utilized  in place of the ATP  bond energy. The




phosphorus would be directly released to solution from the polyphosphate




molecule.  If direct substitution is  the  major means of phosphorus release,




the above ATP to ADP reaction would also occur producing a low ATP/ADP




ratio in the cell.




    Under aerobic conditions, the  strict aerobes- oxidize stored metabolites




and other substrates to provide energy to increase  the ATP  content of the cell.




After a very short time, the ATP/ADP ratio in the cell becomes  high enough




to trigger the formation of polyphosphate via  the reversible polyphosphokinase




enzyme. This results in the formation of polyphosphate granules which are




stable  storage products in an aerobic environment.




    The performance of the  PhoStrip process  is consistent with the theory.




The theory implies a temperature dependency. In fact, an Arrhenius  type




relationship has been established.  This theory also indicates that the rate




of phosphorus release per unit mass of organisms is a function of the duration
                                    164

-------
of the anoxic period, as well as the quantity and activity of facultative




organisms.  The activity of the facultative bacteria can be related to the




Food-to-Microorganism ratio  (F/M) of the activated sludge system,  while




quantity is related to the concentration of sludge in the stripper tank.  Since




strict aerobes are implicated in the above theory, too long an anoxic period




relative to the aerobic period could cause the organisms to cease phosphorus




uptake.  Experimentally determined operating limits for such a response do




exist. However,  there is a broad spectrum of conditions under which good




performance has been established.




     The  finite capacity of these organisms for phosphorus storage results




in a loading requirement which must not be exceeded if a high degree of




phosphorus removal is to be achieved.  Different activated sludge systems




have exhibited different maximum  levels of phosphorus per unit mass of




MLVSS.  This maximum  P/VSS  ratio has been observed to be a function




of the viable organism content of the volatile suspended solids.  The  P/




VSS ratio observed in efficiently operating PhoStrip Systems depends on the




phosphorus available in the feed,  the maximum  P/VSS   ratio attainable,




and the environmental conditions presented  earlier.




     Ideally,  all the  phosphorus in the feed would be incorporated into the




cell mass and wasted from the system  as biological sludge.  This mode of




operation would eliminate the need for chemical precipitation facilities and




significantly reduce  the operating cost of the process.  However,  there are




factors which prevent this from being realized in all but a few instances.
                                     165

-------
First, effluent quality is a function of the soluble and particulate phosphorus




content. Even if an effluent soluble  PQ^ level of ^^.01 mg/1 were achieved,




a 20 mg/1 VSS in the effluent would limit the phosphorus to VSS ratio to <0.05




in order to achieve an effluent  <^ 1.0 mg PO.-P/l.  Second, for a given P/




VSS level;, a specific quantity of sludge must be wasted as dictated by phos-




phorus mass balances  in order to remove enough phosphorus to achieve the




desired effluent.  The amount wasted generally depends on the F/M (SRT) of




the system.  In most cases a high degree of phosphorus removal could only be




achieved at very high F/M (low SRT)  values because of the low   P /VSS levels




necessary to satisfy effluent criteria as presented above.  Third, bio-chemical




sludges tend to release phosphorus when digested.  If high   P /VSS levels




are employed for phosphorus removal, large quantities of phosphorus could




return to the head end of the plant. This level of phosphorus return would




require a significant increase in sludge wasting unless some method of chemi-




cal precipitation were employed.




    The PhoStrip System is normally  designed for a phosphorus content of




0.03-0.04 Ib. P/lb.  VSS in the sludge in order to achieve  effluents of less




than 1.0 mg PO -P/l. • The phosphorus that is not removed through wasting is




precipitated from the supernatant  stream leaving the stripper tank. The




relative amounts of phosphorus removed through sludge wasting and precipi-




tation depend on the  F/M (SRT) of the activated sludge  system and the BOD5 /P




level in the wastewater. The ratio of phosphorus removal  by precipitation to
                                    166

-------
the overall phosphorus removal can range from 0 to 0.9+. Each wastewater




will result in different values of this ratio depending on the design conditions




of the activated sludge system and the method of waste sludge disposal.






     Chemical Precipitation of Phosphorus




     Lime was chosen as the  precipitant because of its pH functionality.




Unlike alum and ferric chloride,  the gross quantity of lime required for pre-




cipitation of phosphorus in water is dependent only on the amount and alkalinity




of the water not the concentration of phosphorus.  Further reduction in chemical




requirements  can be achieved by precipitating phosphorus at lower pH levels




(8.5 -  9.0).  At these pH levels, the stripper supernatant after lime addition




may typically contain 2-5 mg soluble PO^-P/l. A lowerphwillalsoresultin sub-




stantially less  chemical sludge to be handled because less calcium carbonate




and no magnesium hydroxide are formed.  The chemical sludge production will




be typically less than 50 percent of that produced at a pH = 10.5.  This material




could be used as an agricultural fertilizer because of  its high phosphate content.









FULL SCALE PERFORMANCE




     The PhoStrip system has  been demonstrated at two localities under full




scale conditions and 9 pilot plant locations.  These two full scale plants




were Seneca Falls, NY and Reno/Sparks,  Reno, Nevada.
                                    167

-------
SENECA FALLS. NY


    The wastewater treatment facility at Seneca Fall,  NY is an activated


sludge treatment plant with two trains and a total capacity of 3 .5 MGD

          3
(13,247 m /day).  The plant consists of a bar screen, comminutor, two cir-


cularprimary clarifiers, twocompletely mixed aeration basins with mechanical


aerators,  two rectangular secondary clarifiers and a  chlorine contact chamber.  The

The wastewater is largely domestic in character with a BOD  of approximately

160 mg/1; total dissolved solids of 680 mg/1 and total phosphorus of 6.3 mg/1.


    Conversion of the plant to the PhoStrip process was facilitated by the

                                                                         3
fact that,  at the time of the study,  the raw wastewater flow was only 3800 m /G


(1 mgd).   This enabled the plant to handle the full plant flow through one of


the two reactor trains, thus freeing a primary clarifier to provide the anoxic


 environment required for the return sludge to release excess phosphorus.


The tank providing this anoxic  zone has been labelled the "stripper tank".


The use of a single train to treat the entire wastewater flow also permitted


the test to be run on a system that was  much nearer the design hydraulic loading


for the Seneca Falls plant.  The use of the primary  clarifier as the stripper tank


was expeditious; however, it was  significantly oversized relative  to the waste-


      flow entering the aeration basins.  Table  1 presents a  concise summary


of the data obtained during the first thirty days of operation at Seneca Falls.


It  is evident from this table that substantial savings have been demonstrated.


The amount  of lime has been greatly reduced  since  the supernatant from the
                                     168

-------
Table  1.   Results of Phosphorus Removal  Test
           at Seneca Falls,  N.Y.
 Plant Flow, m3/d (mgd)
 Return Flows, percent of raw flow:
     Sludge to Stripper
     Sludge to Aeration from Stripper
     Supernatant to Primary Clarifier
 Total Suspended Solids, mg/1:
     Mixed Liquor
     Sludge to Stripper
     Sludge to Aeration from Stripper
 Influent, mg/1:
    Total Phosphorus
Effluent, mg/1:
    BOD5
    Total Phosphorus
Plant Performance:
    BOD5 Removal, percent
    Total Phosphorus Removal,  percent
Lime Dose, Stripper Supernatant,  mg/1 of supernatant
                                         (as CaO)
Lime Dose, prorated to mg/1 of raw flow (as CaO)
                                                3400 (0.9)

                                                24
                                                10
                                                14

                                                1,440
                                                7,840
                                                15,910

                                                158
                                                6.3
                                                .6

                                                98
                                                91
                                                170
                                                24
                       169

-------
PhoStrip stripper is only fourteen percent of the incoming flow.  Calculated on


the basis of the incoming flow, the lime dose would be 24 mg/1 as CaO.


When compared to conventional lime requirements of 300-660 mg/1 for post


precipitation to obtain the same  total phosphorus effluent concentration of


less than 1 ppm (0.6 ppm), the savings are quite apparent.  This represents


the period of operation during which the performance of the process was inten-


sively monitored.  ,The recycle flow rates presented are typical of a system


utilizing sludge thickening in the stripper tank to produce  the phosphate-


enriched supernatant.  The data  on plant performance indicates that very high


removals of both BODS  and phosphorus were achieved. The lime dosage is


reflective of the chemical requirements anticipated  for many full scale systems.



RENO/SPARKS. RENO. NEVADA


    The Reno/Sparks  facility is  designed to process an average flow  of

        3
76,000 m /d (20 mgd) and discharges into the Truckee River.  The system con-


sists of an aerated grit chamber, three primary clarifiers, three activated sludge


trains and three secondary clarifiers. The PhoStrip System initially operated


by Kennedy Engineers, San Francisco, California,  on one third of the total av-

                         3
erage plant flow (25,000 m /d) by using the sludge recycle option of operation


(Figure 2).   In this option, the stripper is operated in a thickening mode and a


portion of the stripper underflow is recycled back to the stripper feed. The rea-


son for recycling the underflow is to increase the supernatant phosphorus by mix-


ing high P/low P streams.  (This mode of operation produced an elutriation effi-


ciency of approximately 38%, where elutriation efficiency,  E, is defined as the
                                     170

-------
Wastewater
Primary
Clarifier
              Lime
               Reactor
              Clarified
                 \| Waste
                   Sludge
                   Chemical
                                     Aeration
(Secondary
  Clarifier
                                                                           Effluent
                                         Direct Recycle
                               Stripper
                              Supernatant
                              Stripper
                                          Stripper
                                           Feed
                  Waste
                  Sludge
                                             Sludge
                                           Recycle
                                     Stripper Return
                  Figure 2.    Sludge Recycle Option
                                        171

-------
amount of phosphorus removed by the stripper overflow per day divided by the



amount of phosphorus released  in the stripper per day. )




      On June 25,  1975, Union  Carbide Corporation began its evaluation of the



 PhoStrip process  on the full scale plant at Reno/Sparks, Nevada.  A set of



 conditions was established  on the full scale (Table 2) -and the system was



 allowed to come to steady state.  After steady operating conditions were



 achieved, a period of intensive evaluation followed.  Table 3 presents  the



 results of analyses performed  at Reno/Sparks during this phase.  Figures  3  &



 4 present the influent and effluent phosphorus levels during the testing period



 and their variation with the  flow to the plant. The system demonstrated excel-



 lent effluent quality in all respects, and as evident in the figures, total phos-



 phorus levels were consistently 1 mg/1 or less.



      In an effort to improve the elutriation efficiency a  low phosphorus  elutria-



 tion (LPE) modification was  employed. The  cross sectional area requirement



 for the stripper as dictated by the  limiting-flux theory is reduced relative to the



 sludge recycle  system.  Since the primary clarifier (stripper tank) at the Reno/



 Sparks plant had  a fixed  cross-sectional area,the solids flux considerations


                                                   3
 indicated that two-thirds of the plant flow (50,000 m  /d)  could be treated



 with the available area.  As a result, the system was  modified according to



 Figure  1,  which was referred to earlier.  Table 4 presents  the operating condi-



 tions for this two week test period  (Jan.  18-30,  1977)  and Figure 5 graphically



 displays the influent and effluent phosphorus concentration.  Again, the efflu-



 ent total phosphorus levels were usually 1.0 mg/1 of phosphorus or under.
                                      172

-------
Table 2.  Operating Conditions for the Phostrip
          Sludge Recycle System - Full Scale Testing
          at Reno/Sparks, Nevada (9/13/75-9/27/75)
Parameter
Flow Rates (m3/day)
Feed, (Q)
Recycle to Stripper (R,)
Stripper Underflow (R^)
Stripper Supernatant *
Recirculation Rate (R2)
Waste Sludge Rate
Aeration Time, Hr. (based on Q)
Anoxic Period, Hr. (based on R3)
MLSS, mg/1
MLVSS, mg/1
RjSS, mg/1
RiVSS, mg/1
R3SS, mg/1
R3VSS, mg/1
-TSS Stripper Supernatant, mg/1
VSS Stripper Supernatant, mg/1
D.O., End of Aeration, mg/1
D.O. , Rj, mg/1
\ D.O., R3, mg/1
pH, End of Aeration Basin
PH, Ri
pH, RJJ/
pH, Stripper Supernatant
Temperature, "C
F/Ma (kg COD/day/kg MLVSS)
Clarifier Overflow Rate, m/day
Clarifier Blanket Level, m.%
Minimum

14, 690
5,180
2,330
2,850
4,230
639
10.2
16.
_
-
3,060
2,480
9,620
7,700
65
50
_
0.4
0.3
_
6.8
6.4
6.6
23
-
22.4
0.08
Time
Weighted
Maximum Mean

25,060
7,340
4,150
3,200
2,420
639
6.0
9.4
_
-
4,620
3,740
9,120
7,300
90
69
1.5 (0.7-2.2)
0.7
0.3
7.0
6.8
6.4
6.5
23
—
38.2
0.09

22,460
6,830
3,630
3,110
2,850
639
7.1
11.0
1,150
900
4,230
3,420
9,250
7,340
84
64
_
0.6
0.3
—
-
-
—
23
0.96
34.3
0.09
                         173

-------
        Table 3.  Analytical Results for  the Phostrip
                  Sludge  Recycle System Full Scale Testing
                  at  Reno/Sparks, Nevada  (9/13/75-9/27/75)
           Parameter
                                      Minimum    Maximum
                  Flow
                Weighted
                  Mean
COD, mg/1
 Influent
 Effluent
                       mg/1
Total Suspended Solids,
  Influent
  Effluent
Effluent Volatile Suspended Solids,mg/1

Total Phosphorus, mg P/l
  Influent
  Effluent (ortho)
  Stripper Supernatant
  Stripper Underflow
  Filtered Stripper Underflow
  Filtered Aeration Effluent (ortho)
  Secondary Clarifier Underflow

P/VSS
  Secondary Clarifier Underflow
  Stripper Underflow
                                        187
                                        40
                                       19
                                       13
                                       9.6
                                       1.0 (.
                                       44
                                       257
                                       67

                                       104
                                       0.042
                                       0.025
3)
      266
      37
      13
      10
9.1
0.8
41
240
55
-  (-
161
(.4)
          04)
     0.043
     0.025
            253
            37
            113
            13
            10
9.2
0.8 (.4)
42
247
58

113
           0.043
           0.025
                                 174

-------
=3
cr
o
X
Q.
05
O
X
Q.
      22-
      20 -
       8 J
       2 -
0 -
8 -
       6  -
      4  -J
      0
                       INFLUENT TOTAL = A
                       EFFLUENT  TOTAL = D
                       EFFLUENT  ORTHO= O
                             7  18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  26 27
                            SEPTEMBER,  1975
    Figure 3.  Reno/Sparks  Full Scale Phosphorus Data  Obtained
              during Minimum  Flow Period (16% of the  Total
              Volume Treated  by the Phostrip System)
                               175

-------
en
OL
O
m
Q.
CO
O
IE
Q_
      22-
      20-
       8 -
       6 -I
       4 -
       2 -
0 -
8 -
       6 ~
       4 -I
       2 H
                        INFLUENT  TOTAL =
                 EFFLUEN'T TOTAL «D

                 EFFLUENT ORTHO =O
             2 13 14  15  16 17 IS 19 20 2! 22  23 24 25 26 27

                           SEPTEMBER, 1975
     Figure  4.  Reno/Sparks  Full Scale Phosphorus Data Obtained
               during Maximum Flow Period (84% of the Total
               Volume Treated by the Phostrip System)
                               176

-------
      12-,
       I-
      10-
       9-
       8-
       7-
    cc
    o
    X
    O
    I
    a.
       6-
       5-
      4-
      3-
      2-
       1-
                      INFLUENT=A
   EFFLUENTS =B

   EFFLUENT*2 =O
               X>
O- - _ _
                           	O
            I    I    \    II    1    I    I    I   Till

            18  |9  20  21  22 23  24  25  26  27 28 29  30

                          JANUARY, 1977
Figure  5.  Reno/Sparks  Full Scale Phosphorus Data for  LPE System
                             177

-------
    A comparison between the LPE and sludge recycle system indicates that the




LPE System was capable of producing the same quality effluent while utilizing




the same stripper,  but handling twice the flow.




    The main reason for this is an improvement in elutriation efficiency with




the LPE System ( £ = 0.59 vs.  £ = 0.38).  This improvement translates to a




decrease in the initial capital cost due to the decrease in tankage.
                                    178

-------
                          ECONOMIC EVALUATION








 COMPARISON OF OPERATING COSTS FOR PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SYSTEMS




     Table 4 shows a comparison of operating costs for various phosphorus




 removal systems.  Included in the  comparison are conventional chemical pre-




 cipitation with lime, alum, ferric chloride and pickle liquor, as well as the




 PhoStrip process with lime or pickle liquor addition.  The costs  are based on




 an alkalinity of 250 mg/1, and an influent phosphorus concentration of 1 mg/i.




 Chemical  requirements and costs for the conventional phosphorus removal




 systems were taken from the EPA Process Design Manual for Phosphorus




 Removal (1976) and have been adjusted to  1st quarter 1980. Chemical sludge




 disposal costs were assumed to be $100/ton of dry solids.




     It is apparent from inspection  of Table 5 that the use of the PhoStrip process




 drastically reduces the operating costs for phosphorus removal. For the example




 case shown, operating costs are reduced by approximately 40-55% compared




 to a conventional system using pickle liquor, which has the lowest operating




 cost of the conventional systems.






 CASE STUDY



     The following economic study  has been taken verbatim from the EPA Bio-




 logical-Chemical Process for Removing Phosphorus at Reno/Sparks, NV




publication,  and is for  illustrative purposes only.
                                    179

-------
          Table 4.    Operating Conditions  for  Full  Scale
                       Testing  at  Reno/Sparks, Nevada
                       Phostrip LPE  System  (January 18-30, 1977)
     PARAMETER
                                    MINIMUM
                                  TRAIN I/TRAIN 2
  MAXIMUM*
TRAIN I/TRAIN 2
     FLOW
WEIGHTED MEAN
 TRAIN I/TRAIN 2
Flow Rates, m /day
  Feed 0. (each train)                 17280/17280      29380/29380      22460/22460
  Recycle to Stripper. RI              1987/2160        3200/3370        2510/2680
  Stripper Underflow, R3              1210/1470        2250/2250        1640/1810
  Stripper Supernatant, S              6570             7000             6740
  Elutrlatlon, EL                     5270             5620             5440
  Total Aerobic Recycle, Rj + Rdirect    -                ~                4490/5530
  Sludge Wasting                     -                -                331/418

Aeration Time, Hrs.  (based on Q)       9.0/9.0          5.1/5.1          6.8/6.8
Anoxic Period, Hrs.  (based on R$)      11.6             7.0              9.5

MLSS, mg/1                         1230/1280        1110/1140        1170/1220
  VSS/TSS                           0.8              0.8              0.8
RlSS, mg/1                         5750/5460        6770/6720        6210/6030
  VSS/TSS                           0.78             0.78             0.78
R3SS, mg/1                         8930             8310             8650
R3VSS, mg/1                         7360             6590             7010
TSS Stripper Supernatant, mg/1                                           59
VSS Stripper Supernatant, mg/1                                           54

pH, Mixed Liquor, mg/1              7.1/7.0          7.0/7.0

Temperature (Influent), *C             13               13               13
F/Ma (kg BODs/dayAg MLVSS)         0.45             0.88             0.62

                                                    44.8/44.8        34.3/34.3
                                                                     <0.2
Secondary Clarifier Overflow Rate,m/day 26.4/26.4
Clarifier Blanket Level,  m.
            duration at max. flow y 11 hrs/day
                                         180

-------
    CO
 w e
 4J (U
 03 4J
 O U)
 O >i
    CO
 Cn
 C rH
••-I (0
 -P >
 rd O
 M e
 QJ CJ
u-i  3
 O  SJ
    O
 C £,
 o  a
 CO  CO
•H  o
 ^ x:
 ro Oi
 Q.
 6  U
 O  O
U 4-4
in
 m
EH
Q
S|
O ®
a,-.
S S42
0 O
H O
O (D
•3 n "*
£ O 42
o Q,
JS 01 Q
^3 °
*O (U •*
ij Ol L-
w T3 (U
0 3 &.
O 55
D
O>
•o S
u-i 3 C
0wS
in
•0 15 D
§5"
o g 2
^ S u.
J3  O O
CM LO U3





1 1
L-. IM
Tf ^ CO ^ ^D
LO C-J
O
CM r-t
5 ^
o o
oo o o
00 to CT)
rM r-t r-.







Chemicals and/or
Process Used


4) O , o S "5 "h  ,_ »~* C . >y<
1 1 5 S 1 ' § < 1
„. c — * ••-* f5cO.y
I § « « 5 -5.55 s
.5 O=HCT3O°^SO
^ S<3 1 ^«" .y
s ?S^-§ 1 j-g| g
KOwO <
-------
ADRIAN.  MICHIGAN




    The proposed Adrian WWTP design is for a two-stage activated sludge




system.  The first stage will be used for carbonaceous removal and the second




stage will convert ammonia to nitrate.  The PhoStrip process will be operated




in conjunction with the first stage aeration system. The main advantage of




the PhoStrip System is dosing only 10-15% of the sewage flow with chemicals




as compared to the conventional method of chemical treatment which uses




addition of chemical to the entire flow of sewage.  Most of the operating ex-




penses of phosphorus removal is the chemical cost and the PhoStrip System




significantly reduces this  cost.  (Tables 6 & 7)




    An economic evaluation was made comparing PhoStrip against the traditional




chemical addition methods using ferric chloride and alum.  The cost-effective




analysis  included initial installment cost and total annual costs which includes




capital cost amortized over 20  years at  6.125%interest; chemical cost; operating




labor; maintenance and repair costs; and sludge disposal costs.




    The PhoStrip costs were based on (chemical) treatment of 15% of the maximum plant



flow of 7 mgd ,  or  1.0 mgd.  The cost of the two traditional  chemical processes




were based on total plant flow  of 7 mgd.  The bench scale lime dosage test




conducted during the pilot plant operation established a lime dosage of 250 mg/1




to produce the desired treatment.  The dosage required for treatment with the




traditional chemicals were:  90 mg/1 of ferric chloride and 135 mg/1 of alum.
                                    182

-------
          Table 6.   Cost Comparison  between Phostrip  and
                     Chemical Addition  for Phosphorus  Removal
                     at  Adrian, Michigan
Design Flow = 7 mgd
Influent P = 10 mgd
Effluent P = 1 mg/1

            Item                       PhoStrip  Ferric Chloride   Alum

A.  Installed Investment1                 $520,000   $ 60,000   $  65,000
B.  Annual Costs
    1. Amortized Investment2 (A x 0.08897)   46,265      5,338       5,783
    2. Chemical Costs
      a. Lime3                          20,000       	        	
      b. Ferric Chloride4                  —      105,500
      c. Alum5                           —         —     115,000
    3. Operating Labor, Maintenance
      & Repair                            8,006      3,000       3,500
    4. Sludge Disposal Cost O&M         at 800T/yr  at835 T/yr   at 525 T/yr
      a. Anaerobic Digestion at $5/ton      4,000      4,175       2,625
      b. Transport of Liquid Sludge by
         Tank Truck at $15/Ton            12,000     12,525       7,875

    TOTAL ANNUAL COST                   90,265    130,538    134,783

    $/mg                                 $33.50    $51.. 10     $52.75
    See Table 7    for cost breakdown.
 2
    Assumes a 20-year equipment life and 6-1/8% capital cost.
 o
    Based on a 250 mg/1 lime dosage, 15% Qt supernate flow, and a lime
    cost of  $50/ton delivered, (where Qt is the total influent flow to the plant.)
 4
    Based on a 90 mg/1 FeClg dosage,  7 mgd flow, and a FeCis cost of
    $110/ton delivered.

    Based on a 135 mg/1 alum dosage,  7 mgd flow, and an alum cost of
    $80/ton delivered..*
                                   183

-------
                   Table 7.  PhoStrip Cost Comparison


 Equipment Cost '(PhoStrip)                                         Cost

  1.  Stripper Tank
     a.  Concrete 65-ft. dia.  at 20-ft. SWD                      $150,000
     b.  Mechanism & Warranty (supplied by  Union Carbide)        245,000

  2 .  Lime-Mix Tank
     a.  Concrete 9-sq.  ft.  at 12-ft. SWD                         57,500
     b.  Mixer                                                    2,500

  3.  Pumps
     a.  Stripper supernatant Pumps                                 2,000
     b.  Anaerobic RAS Pumps                                       2,000
     c.  Stripper Waste Pumps                                      1,000

  4.  Lime Feed Equipment* (50 ton Bin, Feeder, Slaker)               60,000

     Total Installed Cost                                        $520,000

        * Cost taken from EPA Manual "Phosphorus Removal", p. 10-32
     ENR  =     	 =  1.53
             1643(1971)

Equipment Cost (Ferric Chloride)

  1.  Bulk  Storage  2/8000 gal. tanks                             $ 25,000
  2.  Pumps
         Transfer                                                 15,000
         Feed
  3.  Dilution and Feed Tanks, Agitation,  Piping                     20,000
     Total Installed Cost                                        $ 60,000

Equipment Cost (Alum)

  1.  Bulk Storage  4/8000 gal. tanks                             $ 50,000
  2.  Pumps
         Transfer                                                 15,000
         Feed
         Metering
     Total Installed Cost                                        $ 65,000
                                   184

-------
    The estimated total annual cost of increasing the capacity of the existing




plant and adding the capability for phosphorus removal are:  $85,565 per year




using the PhoStrip process; $129,163 per year using the ferric chloride process;




and $136,183 per year using the alum process.
                                    185

-------
                           REFERENCES
1)  Fuhs, G. W., and Min Chen, "Microbiological Basis of Phosphate in
    Activated Sludge Process for Treatment of Wastewater, "  Microbial
    Ecology,  1976.

2)  Kornberg, S. R., "Adhenosine Triphosphate Synthesis from Polyphosphate
    by an Enzyme from Eschericia Coli",  Biochimica et Biophysica, Acta, 26.,
    294, 1957.

3)  Buller,  L.,  "A Suggested Approach to ATP Regeneration  for Enzyme Tech-
    nology Applications",  Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 19, 591, 1977.

4)  Fox, J. L.,  "Pyrophosphate Drives Biochemical Reaction", Chemical &
    Engineering News,  22, April 25,  1977.
                                   -L O U               a US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1980-657-165/0077

-------