EPA/600/8-88/058
                                              August,  1989
            HEALTH  EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
FOR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY ACETIC ACID (2,4,5-T)
  ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
  OFFICE OF  HEALTH  AND  ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              CINCINNATI,  OH   45268

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  document  has  been  reviewed  1n  accordance with  the U.S.  Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency's   peer   and administrative   review  policies  and
approved  for  publication.   Mention of  trade  names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       n

-------
                                    PREFACE


    This report  summarizes  and evaluates Information relevant  to  a  prelimi-
nary  Interim  assessment of adverse  health  effects associated  with  2,4,5-T.
All  estimates  of acceptable  Intakes and  carcinogenic  potency  presented  In
this document should be  considered  preliminary  and reflect  limited resources
allocated  to  this  project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and  environmental  data
were  located  through on-line  literature searches  of the  TOXLINE,  and  the
CHEMFATE/DATALOG data bases.   The basic literature  searched  supporting this
document 1s current  up  to  May, 1986.  Secondary  sources  of Information have
also been relied upon 1n the preparation of  this  report  and represent  large-
scale health assessment  efforts that entail  extensive peer and Agency review.
The  following  Office of Health  and Environmental Assessment  (OHEA)  sources
have been extensively utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.   1981.   Risk   Assessment   on  (2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxy)
    Acetic  Add,   (2,4,5-T),   2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxy  Proplonlc  Add,
    2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorod1benzo-p-d1ox1n   (TCDD).     EPA    600/6-81-003.
    NTIS PB 81-234825.

    U.S.  EPA.   1988.   Integrated   Risk   Information   System  (IRIS).
    Reference Dose  for  Oral Exposure for  2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxy Acetic
    Add  (2,4,5-T).   Online.  (Verification  date 01/20/88.)   Environ-
    mental Criteria and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH.

    The Intent 1n these  assessments  1s  to  suggest acceptable  exposure  levels
whenever sufficient  data were  available.  Values  were not  derived or  larger
uncertainty factors  were employed  when the  variable data  were  limited  In
scope   tending   to   generate   conservative   (I.e.,   protective)  estimates.
Nevertheless,   the  Interim  values  presented  reflect  the  relative degree  of
hazard associated with  exposure or risk to  the chemlcal(s) addressed.

    Whenever  possible,   two  categories  of  values  have  been  estimated  for
systemic  toxicants   (toxicants  for  which  cancer  1s  not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).   The  first,   the AIS  or  acceptable   Intake  subchronlc,  Is  an
estimate of  an exposure level  that would not  be expected to  cause adverse
effects when  exposure  occurs  during  a  limited time Interval  (I.e.,  for  an
Interval that  does  not  constitute  a significant  portion of  the  Hfespan).
This type of  exposure estimate has  not  been  extensively  used,  or  rigorously
defined, as  previous risk  assessment efforts  have been primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants  In  ambient  air  or water  where  lifetime
exposure Is assumed.  Animal  data  used  for  AIS  estimates  generally  Include
exposures with  durations of 30-90  days.  Subchronlc human data are  rarely
available.   Reported   exposures  are  usually   from  chronic   occupational
exposure situations  or  from reports  of acute accidental  exposure.

    The AIC,  acceptable Intake  chronic, Is  similar 1n  concept to the  RfO
(reference dose).  It 1s an estimate of an exposure  level  that would  not  be
expected to  cause adverse  effects  when  exposure occurs  for  a  significant
portion  of  the  llfespan  [see U.S.  EPA  (1980)   for  a  discussion  of  this
concept].  The AIC 1s route-specific  and estimates  acceptable exposure for a
given route with the Implicit  assumption  that exposure  by  other routes  1s
Insignificant.
                                      111

-------
    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncardnogens  have also  been  calculated
where  data  permitted.   These  values  are used  for  ranking  reportable  quan-
tities and  the methodology  for  their development  1s explained In  U.S.  EPA
(1983).

    For compounds for which  there  1s  sufficient evidence of carclnogenlclty,
AIS and  AIC  values  are not  derived.   For a  discussion of  risk  assessment
methodology  for  carcinogens  refer  to U.S.  EPA  (1980).   Since cancer  Is  a
process that  1s  not characterized  by  a  threshold, any  exposure contributes
an Increment  of  risk.   Consequently,  derivation of AIS  and  AIC values would
be Inappropriate.   For carcinogens,  q-|*s  have  been  computed based  on oral
and Inhalation data 1f available.
                                       1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT


    In  order  to  place the  risk  assessment  evaluation  1n  proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this  series  as  well  as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    The data  base for  2,4,5-T contained several  subchronlc  toxldty studies
and  teratogen1dty/reproduct1ve  effects  studies,  but  there was  relatively
IHtle useful chronic  toxldty  Information.   There were, however,  two  long-
term studies using rats, a 2-year  feeding  study  and  a  3-generat1on reproduc-
tive effects  study,  that both defined  a  NOEL of  3  mg/kg.   This  value  from
the 2-year  dietary  study using  rats  (Koclba  et al.,  1979)  was used as  the
basis  for  an  oral RfD  of  2  mg/day  (U.S. EPA,  1988).   The  maximum CS  that
could be calculated from chronic toxldty  data was  28  and was derived from a
2-year feeding  study using mice  1n which   12 mg/kg/day  resulted  In decreased
survival time  (Muranyl-Kovacs et  al.,  1976).   A  subchronlc  rat NOEL of 10
mg/kg/day  (Gehrlng and Betso, 1978)  was   used as  the basis  for an RfD$ of
7.0  mg/day.   The  available   Information   was  judged  to  be  Inadequate  for
evaluating the cardnogenldty of 2,4,5-T  and  Inhalation RfDs.

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
1. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
2. ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2. INHALATION 	
3. TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
	 1
	 4
	 4
	 4
	 5
	 5
	 5
	 6
	 6
	 6
	 7
w * w *

3.4.
i ui\n i UULIIAUI i i nnu u i mix ni.rnuvuui.ifL u i i
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
4. CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1.


4.2.


4.3.
4.4.
HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
	 8
	 18
	 18
	 19
	 19
	 19
	 19
	 	 19
	 19
	 20
	 21
	 21
5.  REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	   22
                                     v1

-------
                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS

                                                                        Page
 6.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   23

     6.1.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE SUBCHRONIC (AIS) 	   23

            6.1.1.   Oral	   23
            6.1.2.   Inhalation	   23

     6.2.   ACCEPTABLE INTAKE CHRONIC (AIC)	   24

            6.2.1.   Oral	   24
            6.2.2.   Inhalation	   26

     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^)	   26

 7.  REFERENCES	   27

APPENDIX: Summary Table for 2,4,5-T	38

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES
No.
1-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
6-1
Title
Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and
Environmental Fate for 2,4,5-T 	
Studies on the Potential Teratogenlc Effects of 2,4,5-T
and Its Esters Administered to Mice by Gavage. ......
Studies on the Potential Teratogenlc Effects of Orally
Administered 2,4,5-T and Us Esters to Rats 	
Studies on the Potential Teratogenlc Effects of 2,4,5-T
1n Other Experimental Mammals Treated Orally 	
Composite Scores for the Tox1c1ty of 2,4,5-T by
Paae
2
9
12
14

Oral Exposure	   25
                            V111

-------
                             LIST  OF ABBREVIATIONS
CAS
CS
DHSO
DNA
E050
LOAEL
LOEL
NOAEL
NOEL
ppb
ppm
RBC
RfD
RfDj
RfD0
RfDS
RVd
RVe
SAP
SGPT
TLC
TLV
TWA
UV
Chemical Abstract Service
Composite score
Dimethyl sulfoxlde
Oeoxyr1bonucle1c acid
Dose effective to 50% of the recipients
Lowest-observed-adverse effect level
Lowest-observed-effect level
No-observed-adverse-effect level
No-observed-effect level
Parts per billion
Parts per million
Red blood cells
Reference dose
Inhalation reference dose
Oral reference dose
Subchronlc reference dose
Subchronlc Inhalation reference dose
Subchronlc oral reference dose
Dose-rating value
Effect-rating value
Serum alkaline phosphatase
Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
Thin-layer chromatography
Threshold limit value
Time-weighted average
Ultraviolet
                                      1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY  AND  FATE

    Selected  physical  and  chemical  properties   and environmental  fate of
2,4,5-T are presented In  Table 1-1.
    In the atmosphere, 2,4,5-T should exist partly In vapor  form,  and  partly
as  adsorbed  matter  on air-borne  participates  as a result  of  vapor  phase
adsorption or wind  erosion  of treated soil (NorMs,  1981).   2,4,5-T has  the
potential  to  undergo direct photolysis  from  UV  adsorption  at  >290 nm
(PUmmer,  1972),  reaction with  photochemlcally  generated  HO radical  (U.S.
EPA, 1986a)  or  physical  removal  by settling or washout 1n  rainfall  (NorMs,
1981).  The  atmospheric half-life  listed  In  Table 1-1 1s based on the  vapor
phase  hydroxyl   reaction  rate  constant  of  4.59xlO~13  cm3/molecule/sec at
25°C  and  an  ambient  HO  radical   concentration of  8.0xl05 molecule/cm3
(U.S. EPA, 1986a).   In water,  photochemical decomposition and blodegradatlon
appear  to  be  the  dominant  fate  mechanisms.    The  aquatic near-surface
photolysis half-life  during  summer  at  latitude  40°N has  been calculated to
be  15  days.   The  presence  of humlc  substances  greatly  enhances  the  photo-
reaction.  In addle, weakly  absorbing  natural water, Iron and peroxides  may
also catalyze the photoreactlon (Skurlatov et  al..  1983).
    Data regarding the mlcroblal degradation of 2,4,5-T In  soil suggest  that
blodegradatlon  may  also  contribute  significantly  to  the  degradation of
2,4,5-T  In aquatic  systems.   Adsorption   to  suspended  solids and sediments
may  be  significant  since  humlc  adds  found  In  almost  all  water  and  soil
systems have been  shown to strongly adsorb 2,4.5-T from solution  (Wershaw et
al., 1969).  Bloaccumulatlon  1n aquatic organisms  should not  be significant.
0098h                               -1-                              08/14/89

-------
                                  TABLE 1-1

                Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and
                        Environmental  Fate  for  2,4,5-T
        Property
        Value
       Reference
CAS number:

Chemical class:


Molecular weight:

Vapor pressure:

Mater solubility:

Log octanol/water
partition coefficient:

pKa:

Bloconcentratlon factor:
Soil adsorption
coefficient:
Half-lives 1n
  Air:

  Water:

  Soil:
93-76-5

halogenated phenoxy
add herbicide

255.5

NA

268 mg/l at 25°C


3.13

2.88

2-28 (estimated)
2.3


186

53-220

>1 day (estimated for
vapor phase)
<15 days (estimated)

10-208 days
Que Hee et al.,  1981


Hansch and Leo,  1985

Que Hee et al.,  1981

Kenaga, 1980; Garten
and Trabalka, 1983
Nked1-K1zza et al.,
1983
Kenaga, 1980

U.S. EPA, 19863

Skurlatov et al., 1983;
Lyman et al., 1982
McCall et al., 1981;
O'Connor and Wleranga,
1973; Altom and
StrHzke, 1973;
Bovey and Baur, 1972
NA = not available
0098h
        -2-
               08/14/89

-------
In  soil,  2,4,5-T Is expected  to  blodegrade (Rosenburg and Alexander,  1980;
Byast and  Hance, 1975).  The  persistence  of 2,4,5-T 1n soil  Is  reported  to
vary  from  14-300 days depending  upon  climatic conditions and  type  of  soil,
but  usually  does   not  exceed  one  full  growing  season  regardless  of  the
application  rate (McCall  et  al., 1981; O'Connor  and Wleranga,  1973;  A "I torn
and StrHzke,  1973; Bovey and  Baur,  1972).  Measured TLC Rf  values  of 0.17
for muck,  0.48  for  clay,  0.54 for  silt  clay  loam and 0.73-0.89  for  sandy
loam  (Helling,  1971) suggest  that 2,4,5-T  mobility  would vary  from highly
mobile In sandy  soil to slightly mobile 1n muck (Relnbold,  1979).
0098h                               -3-                              10/07/86

-------
           2.   ABSORPTION  FACTORS  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    It has  been reported  that  2,4,5-T 1s rapidly  and efficiently  absorbed
from  the  gastrointestinal  tract  of  mammals,   <98-100X  after  small  doses
(Erne,  1966;   NRCC,  1978).   Over  90X of  single  oral  doses  of  2,4,5-T
(0.04-200 mg/kg) were absorbed from the gastrointestinal  tract  of  rats  (Fang
et al.,  1973;  Piper  et  al.,  1973).   Eaton (1982) found  that  reabsorptlon  of
biliary-excreted 2,4,5-T  was  almost  complete.   Ferry et  al.  (1982)  reported
that  two human volunteers who  Ingested 1 mg  of 2,4,5-T excreted  83.8  and
88.5X  of the  dose  1n  the urine  within 48  hours,  suggesting that  at  least
that much had  been absorbed from the  gastrointestinal  tract.
    Gehrlng et  al.  (1973) conducted a  pharmacoklnetlcs  study 1n  which  oral
doses of 5 mg/kg were administered to  five volunteers  and essentially all  of
the  2,4,5-T  was absorbed  from the  gastrointestinal  tract.   Plasma 2,4,5-T
concentration  appeared to be associated with first-order  rates  of  absorption
and  clearance.   Applying  a  first-order  model  to  the  data,   absorption
constants were  calculated for each  of the  five subjects.   These constants
ranged  from  0.450*0.045  to  2.487^0.225  hour-1,   corresponding   to a  t
of 0.75 hour.
    On the basis of  their  low water  solubility and  by  comparison  with 2,4-0,
esters of 2,4,5-T would probably  be absorbed less readily than  the adds and
salts (Que Hee et al., 1981).
2.2.   INHALATION
    Burton et  al.  (1974)  studied absorption of  various  herbicides  from the
rat  lung by  administering them 1n  Krebs-R1nger  solution through  a  tracheal
cannula.  The  time  necessary  for  50% absorption of  the  administered 2,4,5-T
was  1.7  minutes.   L1p1d   solubility  appeared  to  be  the primary factor  In
determining rate of absorption.
0098h                                4-                              01/27/87

-------
                3.   TOXICITY  IN  HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.  A consideration  In  evaluating 2,4,5-T toxlclty data  1s  that
the compound  1s  usually  formulated  as  a salt  or  ester  In herbicides.   These
salts and esters are  rapidly hydrolyzed to the acid  1n  animals,  however,  so
that  their  toxldty Is  generally  attributable to  the  parent add  (Gehrlng
and Betso, 1978).
    One  of  the major  problems  1n  assessing  the  effects  of  2,4,5-T  1s  the
contamination with  varying amounts  of 2,3,7,8-TCDO.   Many Investigators  were
unaware  of  the  presence and amount  of  2,3,7,8-TCDD 1n a  sample  and,  there-
fore,  this  Information has  gone  unreported In many  studies.   Consequently,
whether   the  reported   effects  are  attributable   to   2,4,5-T   alone,   the
2,3,7,8-TCDD  contaminant, a  combination of both, or  additional  contaminants
such as the carrier of emulslfler Is not clear In  many studies.
    Results from several unpublished subchronlc oral  toxlclty  studies  by Dow
Chemical  Company have  been   reported In  brief form.  In  90-day  rat  studies,
monopropylene,  dlpropylene   and  tMpropylene  glycol  butyl ether esters  of
2,4,5-T  at  186  and 62 mg/kg/day  caused unspecified toxic effects,  while  no
toxic  effects occurred  at   18.6  mg/kg/day  (Advisory  Committee  on  2,4,5-T,
1971;  NAS,  1977).   In another  90-day   study,  groups  of  Sprague-Dawley  rats
were fed  diets containing the acid  form of  2,4,5-T  that  provided doses of  0,
3,  10,  30 or  100  mg/kg/day (Gehrlng and  Betso,  1978).    Depression  In  body
weight  gain   accompanied  by decreased  food  Intakes,  elevated  SAP  In  both
sexes  and  SGPT  In males  and   decreased  RBC  counts and blood  hemoglobin
concentration  In  males,  was observed  at  100 mg/kg/day.  Necropsy  revealed
pale  livers  with hepatocellular  swelling.   At 30  mg/kg/day 2,4,5-T  caused
Increased  relative   liver  and  kidney  weights and  elevated  SGPT  and  SAP
0098h                               -5-                              08/14/89

-------
levels.  No adverse effects were  reported  at  10  and  3 mg/kg/day (Gehrlng  and
Betso, 1978; MAS, 1977).   In another  90-day  rat  study,  100 mg/kg/day 2,4,5-T
containing  TCOO at  0.5 ppm  caused  decreased  growth and  changes  In  serum
enzyme concentrations,  while  no adverse effects  were reported at  3,  10  and
30 mg/kg/day  (Advisory  Committee  on 2,4,5-T,  1971).  Further details  were
not  provided.    The  Weed  Science  Society  of   America   (1979)  reported  10
mg/kg/day as a 90-day NOEL for rats and dogs, but no details were given.
    Drill  and  Hlratzka  (1953)  administered  canned  dog  food  containing
2,4,5-T 1n gelatin capsules to  groups of  1-2 mongrel dogs/sex at 0, 2, 5, 10
or 20 mg/kg, 5  days/week for 90 days.   Dogs  receiving dally oral  doses of 2,
5 or  10  mg/kg  suffered no adverse  effects,  but  four dogs receiving 20 mg/kg
died  during the experiment.   Dogs are much more  sensitive  to the effects of
orally-administered  2,4,5-T  than  rodents,  probably  because  of a  decreased
capacity for renal excretion of the compound.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.     Pertinent   data   regarding   subchronlc  toxldty   of
2,4,5-T  1n  Inhalation  exposures   could  not  be  located  In  the  available
literature.
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   Koclba  et  al.  (1979)  conducted a  2-year  study  In  which
groups of  50  male and  50  female  Sprague-Dawley  rats consumed diets contain-
ing  2,4,5-T  that provided dosages  of 3,  10  or  30 mg/kg/day.   Parameters of
toxlclty that were evaluated  Included appearance and behavior, food consump-
tion,  body weight,  mortality,  hematology. clinical  chemistries,  urlnalysls,
and   gross  and  microscopic  pathology.   Rats   receiving  the  high  dosage
experienced  decreased   body weight gain,  increased   relative  kidney weight,
Increases  In  total  urine  volume,  urinary  coproporphyrlns and uroporphyrlns,
and  morphological  changes  1n  kidneys,   liver   and  lungs.   Liver  effects


0098h                               -6-                              08/14/89

-------
Included  an  Increased  Incidence  of perlportal  Inflammation,  focal  biliary
hyperplasla and  Inflammation.  M1ld  kidney  effects  occurred  at  10 mg/kg/day,
Including  Increased  urinary excretion  of  coproporphyrlns   In   males  at  4
months and a  mild  Increase  In  the Incidence of mineralized deposits  In  the
renal  pelvis  of  females  after  2  years.   No  treatment-related  effects
occurred at 3 mg/kg/day.
    Muranyl-Kovacs  et  al.   (1976)  conducted a  2-year  study   In which  two
strains  of mice  were  fed  2,4,5-T  (dloxln  content  <0.05  ppm).  Male  and
female XVII/G and C3Hf  mice  were  provided  with  drinking water  containing 100
mg/i  (ppm)  from  6  weeks  of age  for  the  next  2  months.   From  then  until
death, 2,4,5-T  was  provided only  1n the diet at  80  ppm.  According  to  the
authors,  this  resulted  In a dosage  of ~12  mg/kg/day.   Effective numbers  of
mice,  those  surviving  >300  days  or those  developing  a tumor at  <300  days,
ranged from  19-44.    Survival  time of  male  C3Hf  mice  was decreased,  but  no
other toxic effects were reported.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  There  have  been  several  ep1dem1olog1cal   studies  con-
cerning  occupational  exposure  to  2,4,5-T,  but  most of  these were concerned
with  cancer  Incidence  and  few  threshold  toxldty  data   were  provided.
Susklnd  and  Hertzberg  (1984)  found  an  Increased  Incidence  of  chloroacne
among  204 workers  exposed  to  2,4,5-T  relative  to   163 unexposed  workers
(55.7% vs. 0%).   There  was also an  association  between exposure and history
of  gastrointestinal  tract ulcers.   Pulmonary function  values  among  exposed
workers  who  smoked were  lower  than those  In unexposed  workers  who  smoked.
There was  no  evidence  of  Increased  risk of  cardiovascular  disease,  hepatic
or  renal  disease,  or nervous  system  problems.   Exposures were  not  quantl-
tated and all of  the  workers 1n  the study were currently or  had been exposed
to other chemicals.
0098h                               -7-                              07/14/89

-------
    Chronic  Inhalation  bloassays  with 2,4,5-T  could  not be  located  1n the
available literature.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY  AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   Several  studies  concerning   the  teratogenldty  of  2,4,5-T
are Included  1n  Tables  3-1 to  3-3,  but  only studies that define thresholds
or address critical Issues  are discussed  In the  text.
    Several  teratogenldty  studies  with  mice are summarized  1n  Table 3-1.
The  most  consistent  teratogenetlc  effect   noted  was  cleft  palate,   which
occurred  1n  the majority  of   the  experiments  (Neubert  and  DUlmann,   1972;
Roll, 1971;  Courtney,  1977;  Courtney et  al.,  1970a,b;  Galnes et al.,  1975;
Chernoff  and  Kavlock,  1982).    TCDD,  a  common  contaminant of 2,4,5-T, 1s a
known teratogen  associated with  the  development  of  cleft palates  1n  mice.
In  order  to  estimate  the contribution  of  TCDD  to  the  Incidence  of   cleft
palate  observed  1n 2,4,5-T-treated  mice, Neubert and  DUlmann (1972) con-
ducted  teratogenldty studies with 2,4,5-T samples of different TCDD content
(samples  A,  B or C, Table 3-1) and  with TCDD  Itself.  They  calculated ED5Q
values  for  Incidence  of cleft  palate using  the  Utter as the experimental
unit  and  found  that the ED™  values  for 2,4,5-T samples  A  and B were much
lower than would be expected  1f TCDD alone were responsible  for  the terato-
genlc activity.  The  estimated ED5Q  values,  however,  Indicated a more than
additive  response,  but  H  1s  not  clear  from  these results If  2,4,5-T  Itself
Is  teratogenlc  or  1f  H  synerglzes the teratogenlc  action  of  TCDD.  The
Induction  of  cleft palate has  been  demonstrated In  three studies  1n  which
relatively  pure 2,4,5-T  was  used   (TCDD content <0.05 ppm)  (Neubert and
DUlmann,  1972;  Roll,  1971;  Courtney,  1977),  suggesting that some terato-
genlc  activity  must  be due  to  2,4,5-T  Itself or  contaminants  other than
TCDD.   In these  studies,  the  highest NOEL for  cleft palate  Induction  was  30
mg/kg  (Neubert  and DUlmann,  1972)  and  the  LOEL was 35  mg/kg  (Roll,  1971).

0098h                               -8-                              07/14/89

-------












Ol
Ol
•V

*^*

Ol
u
X
e
**

01
J^
-
g*


•o

VI
u
01
£
e
•v
i i
C*> U"l
^ J •
§*
^ip^ W

*\
u
Ol
u.
£
u
gj

Q
Ol
p-
"0
c
01
o
Ol

—
c
o
Ol
3
Tz













n
0)
w
Ol
oc





01
I/I
e
VI
Ol
at
01




Ol
VI
C
o

VI
Ol
oc

^*™

e
Ol

e
o
> »
fS i*
oi a
£


Ol
I/I

*
I


01
Ol


a
a
"

«. r-
e i
m

o -
u. e*

Ol
u
Ol


e
«/>

CM
r*
•o 2
** c
— e
k. «
||
41 ^
V O

V* 4rf

<« *.*» O O* ft) ^ •
U 41 *•* 4> 0)
u w 19 •• u »— >
C B O* U ifl 4*
•O 4> ^ -O 41
— — — 0> u- 01
c u > vi
•9 e .— •— — • o
u — • *o O — *n *o
— a<*> c o
"c £ i > i o"*

•21 e — 5 — a —

< » *g

U Ol 41
Ol *• vi
*!!„

W ft* *fl ^tf

X i« X 01
o 01 f i

u — o
O Oi « on

OP



m
pH
1
*a


Ol
^
•O Ol
e? *"

•O*fM
• m c


s*
a^

J o 'v
^ ^ • a 01
e 01 o
U C VI
S 41 O ^ —

u e o>
e 01 •* — -•

• • *o j&

*-> L. BB
0 41 8
Ol —
u. 3 O
Ol
^9 ^^
W Oi *fl

X -O — •
e oi «

e oi oi
c -o 3

eo



m
p»
i
g9




e

si1
sg


s -
Ol
e •—
*l a
d a.~



v
u

^
Ol
Ol
i
1 =

L. 0










^ ,
.. •§,
1 Ol — ^
W *V ^D H
c •— o
••IV • .—
ao m
.e ^ a. Oi
c£~c
— u c ^

i- u "c u.

C 41 — U
"^ ^3 ^* T3

• «

"w S
Q> T3 QP)
v. oi —
^B W ft)
01 IV X
Ol
W W ^™

x oi e
O 13 L.

035
cx> 1

oo



^ft
^B
1
«o





9
?
0

p
u
L. Ol

it
oc u 5



^
w

•o
Ol
Ol
1
0)
a*-

1- 0











0 iS-D
e >»•— ^
oi •- w — u
*** ** ^H 6 B ^
u ^ qr ^ 5
«. 1 I c *~ S
e x — a o-
>v e v<
— 41 "u 4i — S
C *^ Ol w w ^^

^*" C ^ C ^B O



w
Ol
Ik
Ol

u

X
o

o
e

eo



^1
pi»
1
<&




r*

'c o>
J^?






oe


^* b
>. Ol
** **
3 vi
A Ol
^
O>
Ol
VI
t
1-

u e





on

_'
*s
at
w* y» O
ft> 4> •*-
w» Cd vi ^~ C *V
i c en j u o
b e oi — «*
a— 
oiuvi»oih.ae
^ o oi w •» e ja
Ol 3 Ol Ol Ol Oi
C 1. — J< T3 L. >T3
*"«.<£ ^>"3 -o -S S
vi O E C C
41 -o — ifl — Ol

w ^^ ^^ ^ F^ E

eoieee

oe
*


^^
P^
i
vO

O
on oi
, ^
O g1

in«
.
4/
•rf
^
3
O
U

Ol

Ol **•
t^ls
C.^^U
o o — —
•• >-1S c —
u — J3 — ns
41 — a
O> *"• Ol •* **•

z 1 a- w
^ B ^ *^ W
VI
I O

-• 'o>'*i< 1v
e — L. u
w X > <«<
Wv C F" Ol
•^ o •—
C k 41
0>— 0 X
— U

o u. ^v e
C 0) O>J3

eo


m

i
o





Ol

1
in


a
a

o
d
v



v
u


— 41
8§~
C — —
u 41 ••
O UA on


i
u
OQ98h
-9-
07/14/89

-------































^^
.
*•
g
u
f»
n

«J
OB
*
^*"






















U
c
Ol
k.
01
!*
IK




e
o
Ol
at
^
Ol


0)
vi
G
O
A
oe

•c
e
b.
01

'O
1

^
*fl ^*
> t»
bo O
a*
o
«*
e
iv.
(Q •
^
*o
o
Ol
41
O
u
h-
---
e i

• •
iS cJ
Ol

u
2
Ol
^

e
b
V)
«n
Oi
u *
Ol •
£ «
u. 01




1 1 O
c 3 CM
3 e —
•o o -o
C u* C
0
— ' 00
«« -o
•o -2 'Jo
^ i vi Oi
^.
oi a.— g>
1 O
k> 09
0)
2^0.
1^ i1

— * o
u e CM
Ol •* •—
Q.
I/I f— ^
iS^




CK




tf)
1
sO
a oi
eo E
• o
e CM
4T *•»


88

i
0
V



•o
u


»•
U

ifl O
ec
§
«r
r*
en
Ol

01 •
£ <9
tb Ol



1 £
I??
o -o o>
^m^i
22 I1
4)
•o «- a
ai CM a.
^_ c o
— «o c u
Ol vi
VI O •— VI
C — C O











§1




ac





ac
•*.



i/i

«
o
CO
* F- Ol
•1C
1
9%
X r— k.
e >>_4j
3 »* V"
A Ol 01

VI

u

« "o
*H
5

en

^
J<
OP




—• Ol
m 41 oi vi
0 Ol£ -0
. IB «- 41
Ob. •- b.
~ 5" 0 -5
"£•-01 ?
>a — 41 >«
»- vi 3 O —
— • 01 £ 1 — •

1
t—
£ ^
if
•c oi i-
Ol £ Ol
u •< >
e oi
3 — •—
O IQ

e >i vi
b. •» O
a.— -o
£
01 01 VI 1!
e u >.—
— — ^ A

Vi b> CM 0)
u- u *!•<
O VI «O 
1

§

•g g,
« AC

e oi

1
5



2
u
^

0
e
o

i
o
u





» 41 •— Ol
•1 VI I IV u Ol
«• O •» U C II 19
1 (» •O b — 41 v> > viCM b.
«i i oi •— i 0.1— »b.>a »W4l
ki£ O - U — 41 'O • *'eOr->vi C« u- u. — —
tv C ^ *Q O 3 C 9t ^" •** 4) V *" 4) U ft- Ui»


•- O «- ^^ t? O k. C ^ O.wS'Qk.L. u E
c***---'oecugo4i**»Ba>>»uO4>(-^O3














































"S «Q
O
a» 9«
e •—
7^ •
9 *
o — •
<_; iq


^^
1 Ok —
" 41 3 ' —
— U^OCCi— 41
o — »- 01^ "~ — £
eBOtevoioivToe
v £ vi c ev e —
— <«- •o «- o •— •o
C U Ol u 41 b
ra VI •- •- 41 *- 4)
— vi 0 V. 0 -0 £
-" 41 41 £ W vi
Ol u C V ^* 4) ^
— C4iceob.i—











ac




CO




•+
i

2
e
o»
^ j^
• ''v
5i,

|
^



2
W
>a


>> b. -~
41 ttl •—
e ** ••
e 19 <—

O9
f*
U










Q.
3
0
4i
O
i
f1














































0098h
-10-
                                                                     07/14/89

-------

Ol
u
e
01

Oi
0)
ae





Ol
e
O
a.
0?
ae

'•v

Ol
hk



Ol

c
o
a.
VI
Ol
ae
,_
IV
c
w
Ol

£
c
o
i
> -V
L. O
Ol
I/I

o
*•*
1-
IV IV
Ol O
t—
Ol
i
£
i
$
4>
•
— -°. Iv
*s
>.r— oi
Ol 9>
5- S
t * C ^ft

Or- iv 0»
fcj IV ta r—

1 Ol — Ol 0)
~«- ~* u «» «*
m w *v >» c rv •• iv
o Q.I— oi a. oi a.
S.5-2 5-*-
""""' oi o c oi oi
C ^ O U VI u M.

U Ol *k IV Ol Ik "O k 0>
— vi O •*• vio OS
!*• IV Ol 'V r* >^
w*aiaiik oioi^* m
C I- O k u IV O(M
o> u c •a we tn
— C 01 C CllfQik
tO-»--0/B — 13 IV UJ O
^
01
i ^
f~ £

-1
01
^> 9^
IV •«
01 O 0
w ^3 ^~
W ! •-
c o >v ae


91 ac
•- X




LP V
1 1
•a *o
s
en g>
?o
OJ
£ 5


(M
1 S
•V ^


e w
e e
k ^^

• U M
1 •£<">..£
^01 1/1 oi C«*
o — o> c — e e

IVJ>I_IV — — — iu 

s^n^u-icp^x u
e « f— o^ — c*< a a»
u o u u x: v  o a N^^C. a> -^
k. U ^ > O_j ** v ^ u Of
ca^-*^Ao<£a,a a» f—
^^ "O TJ *V UJ CO 2 *••» hAJ O U


2
9*

1
,_

c
u
Oi vi

i 1«

n —
ae -o
x -o e
c —
IV vi
O
— a
^ <**
i ,
•a CD
5
w r
s g*
T o


        o
        en
e  i
o  •
Ik CM
W

-------





























CM
«
J^J
OD
>—










































+*
2
o
k.
Ol

£
I/I
—
e
^^
^T
>n
»
CM
•o
k.
Ol
c
1
>.
^
0

e
u
Oi
£

W
e
L.
ft>

^
^
^
e
1
01
s

01
3
CO

















s
Ol
k.
0)
QB






Ol

e
e
&
VI
Ol
ac
"B
Ol





&
V*
g
a.
vi
u
ac

I
01

e
o
«B »
> •«
0) °
VI
i

L
.5 >>
•V <«
4,0

Ol
I/I
e
a
^
i
a oi
a >
U 41
(— -J
Ik 1—
O >
U1
5 ^r
e •
kwCM

41

U
i
»

e
^

«/>


£
S":
It


41 >• >9
§•"»
k,
k X U X 01 Ol
ft .C ft ft •*

• *" *k *V ^
3 01 ^ ••— ifl
c X c -^ * ft
3 C i— >
>£ Ol Ol Ol
Ol «* Ol 6 H k »
-S $ 2-of-
i. . I/I «• IQ Ol

— — ifl O k.
• a B u c —
• k. x v vi e e
• e oi £ — — oi
• I/I I/I W > «* O*

B
^^
U «•
k. •- •-
00,0
r— ^ H
too

*c * *
t0 V
(•T >e jtf


£

•o
^
1^






VI
1
41
II"


vs'S


j;
VI
§".
V* •
It


,41
Ol tt— <«
> k. i- -0 —
* £ 2 6 ^

I/I rq VI
>»•- 0
•" k. U
u Ol £ 3
•0 S ^
•0 Ol 01 —
91 g. 3 Ol
o> F-o ^ *.
W O C Ol 1^*
ft U iq Ik Ol

^« 0 X
* — Ik O
• ft ~f O ~*

X
^^
U VI
«- e
X Ol
o — •
•• VI »
>- JS "
1^2
i^S
?s*

z




^
^"*
1
^
*o

w»
•^J
7
—

12

•e
u







CO
1

|B ^^

(S'a
•
•
'^
41 r-
§S.
w O
IS
41
Oi vi 
ft ^ I55°«
vi e vi ** ^ ft e
•i'Si e.ft^'x'e Si
* S— o«* >o •< vi
«• v e o > e

^e»*o— i«c*iviifl
** O AQ jf C u *^ 4f *^
£ — i-eee uu
21— ?"" 2« £ a c a
VI Ol M VI O £
«~5" gS'S SiSS


>«
Jc
Ol
0§"»,
^1^=:
u i» a u
Ol *O ^
Ik «* > X
Ik £ k. O
ft Ol ft ~*
~ I/I
e oi A >k
c S e o

o
CM




rfl
^•K
sO
w
O

25
^
i0 ^
.->
i

o

2
w
>e

•
i vi
>» 1 1 O
K ^ r~ r—
e >• >» s
k. Q.J: —
« e •< »-

i
Ol 01 3 rfl —
>O r- 9 CM vi
U 3 U •*
0>i« 9>.-•
>• • *
5452


•«
« »-
vi * B ft
ft ft "~ e
k ik ft r- «* «
u vi »o e
•w ft « t 3 «

• IQ k> ft ^ O
Ol 01 C J4 — —
j< k. — vi e
•v u oi o
oi c c >k — a
B ^m ^ O ^ ^^
O "TJ 0» O 4)
O» ^i **
L> ^ ^V ^ •**
O 4t ** *• ft* ''O
g ^ ^ j= "-jj - ^
^ Ig «i 3 o! 1
Si If St;-
?--
I VI > oi
*!*»=•*
2** 1 >S — o
>i X oi x
— > B o oi
§— >. -• M
i- -0 0 >.
' S *" t 8*
vi <- a *- o B

CM
CM




01
^M
1
stf
k.
e >•

§•0
N.
^- 91
. ^J
S?
• 0
91

Of

J
U
*v



vi B e

3 3 U —
7 9>e "e

 ^
Ix-
i» « «
Hi?


€# h»
-«s
§-••=


kl ^ O
i $ 5
»
r~ 5
of1
Si1
9>

9?
„,_
>> «
3 VI
a ft



VI C C
§::*
S<2 u ^~
o- oi k. •-





^

0*
^
>t
u
J-s


ft 0
VI 9 ^v
ft ft
k ft 1 VI
U £ ft ft 3
^ O ^ ft

— • IQ e
O — 01 Ol L.
V •— > vi O
& fll ft !^ C
** O Ol kl
g'sf-s
kl ^ ^
»• ft Ol X Ol
C tk JC Ifl W
O> Oil— k.
— C — Ol Oi








ac

g




rf>
fw
i
o
v >•
e •«

O Oi
^•^ ^.
^9 •»
>0 v
|

S

•o
u
(^

1 -d
3 C

e o
l/% >» k
e ft ft
i— O C -•
^ = 55
e
I
«rf
^
S







|
o
ft Ol
c 19

^ k.
c e
£ vi
Oi ><
— Ol
•C C
> •
01 —
•^ «ri
i— ir











































0098h
-12-
                                                                     07/14/89

-------






























c
3
U
CM
E1
_
CB
































I

'







01
g
u
01
Ol
at





Ol
c
e
CL
ac
^
10
HI
"



Ol
1
Ol
ac
e

Oi
3.
i
i »
k. O
e
e

— >•
o> a




Ol
^
o
a

^^
^

a

a o>
a >
U Ol



"o *T

k. ^
e •
U. CM



Ol
u
01




e

'Q
^
S

13
* r-
»»i—
0)
S oT




e <
e
u
e o
oi e oi
•o •<
U 3 i—
— Q.
Ol Ol •*
•M i— Ol
_ sr-
- g u
e e
Ol 10 —
VI
• 1>
Ol Ol vi
k. e <«
w "^ 01
e — u
«
r- £ Ol
SOI — -* Vi
•»* wi lift t. -O U1
Ol -O • * -O O O
•x e o vi o — «- •
8— k. V f ~ k. O k. .£ O.
•O 0» u •< 01—-
oi »• — vi e !••••-
u £ ^ •- — k. .c .c i—
3 01 Ol Ol 9> Ol
«! 1 § * ? - 1 .e £

a
CM




Ut
*7
<0


a
-o
to cs

»— ^ ^ U 10 Ol

>> U O vi O u

"8 e — •*•— e >»c
5 — -— e •— •« « >o













S0
1
F"







9>

?















e o o
e CM «
vi e e
•- £ Ol Ol



o

F~ k.
e oi
Ck ^ QC
A k. (/)
S£^
c*>
^
fm*
a
^
e
1


i
VI ~
e w
>• > e
k. Ol —
?e oi
•o c
•X 01
e vi c 10
8^B (^ ^"
« *
n % &> o^
py ^ t^ ^^
Oi vi
^ 01 0
1 t
•— >~



e
C3
^y

"c 0>

Si1





X

">. 01

3 V*
A Ol

o
T
e
e a u
VI O CM Ol
o v> e t—
Sf £ Ol
a •- t -o
erf - 5 c

met x s

f^
2
3^
U *

1-s


^ IQ V*
Of ^ -O
<^ •* 4> Of
** u >»
— "5 "~ -S
u J — -
& ^ **•
UK ^" CD O
U*  v u
C — Oi
TJ L. 13 C
— C U —
<*• >• r— <^ Ol •*•
^ e





0>

^

g

i

\f\

0

^

u





"oi
e
1








S

^»
2
3
JC •
VI »••
k. « Ol

k. k.
ife O A

Ol k,
SI±
Ol >O vi
•e
— C -D
u O Ol
— ^ 01
Ol kl f
^i ^m J
••
— vi O
O
Oi •«) —
vi V Ol vA
"9 01 — O
Ol »*• •
k. <0 — O
kl >— vi V
e oi vi a.
— -o 0 —
r*
5!
k. -a
i S c
10 —
•0 01 -0
Ol k. 01
VI U
»O Ol —
£'*
ell


X



e
"^
i0




01

^^
?

§

i

kn

a

v

u





Ol
1
k









s
ff»
F—
U
O

5
§ e

e | ^ =
-* •« 5 k. >o
Ol VI •• i—
& k. e 0> vi 3
3 Ol I C — >
— — 5 — e o
•— k. a —
>•< e, o E o
•- w 1 10 "
10 Oi C Ol 01 O
k. O — k.
o ^s vi c a c^
E Oi — O

>>— u c 'e v
k. £ O <^ 01
S 4, _ g
e ** 0i** vi
S o 
O A




















































^3
Of

o
k.

o
e

u
ac

g ^
Ol
u
Ol
&
VI

O


If
00
X
0098h
-13-
07/14/89

-------
u
Ol
a>
e>
e
£
o

£
V)
01

s
                41

                e
                u e
                at &
                <«  Cl
               a  >
                   41
                  f$
                  0
                t>  K
                >  s.
                Ci  &
       0098h
s~
li
                          VI U VI 0)
                          4) «• 4^^
                          u   1.5



                          -*J!
                          •O i— £ .O
                          4) 'V    >9

                          ifl U <« r-
                          i— O _C •*



                          41 >V 01

                          9 41 C 6
                          O kk, — IQ
          of


          s!
                                               e  « e  •
                                               e  • <«  •
                                                                      12
                                                                      1C
                                              iZ oi »-  o«
                                         •O   •« 0>    41        014)    4141    Ol Ol    0)4)
                                 4)      H C -• —    —        —      --      —      — —

                                 2 **    **"",£ S    ^        ** ^    ** *°   •*""   "*"
                              —^ o!  1.12 oi 1 £    "5.-      *ii    "i ~   "Si   'i £

                              ol^-ci-fovB    °"      * *    o 2    o oi    e"


                               V       o      o      e
                              —•BiflC'O— nxs    i—        i— e    -- i   i— x   i—5
                                              U      IQ If f   V O    V ~*    ifl —•    >«k
                              -»ci>--.-*oC'-    »>^ai   •J      •-      «<      •• kk.

                               rg   —  li ^U**^4t    O)'"*      4li»    4>L«    01^
                              ^vi    Ol^vikiJU    C9t   ^   9*1^    9^    W^
                              kk-^k.-—kw— c^    e>«oi   e      e       c       c%
                              "OiOl    ^^u^^>    OC*^   Ovi    Ow    Cvi    Of0
                               Cw«^4lC4t    >    UfQlQ   WA    WA    w4    U
                               oi u **  if aikk. oi           n      E      H      B      >•
                              — n—  o — kk.£k_    o c k.   o ^    o ^    o >o    ec
                              W^^w«0»»»O    * — •<   Z»—    Z^   Z^   Z"fl
                                               § "Z
                                                 a <«
                                                 8 0>
                                                                                                V)      V>
                                                                                                z      z
                                               e
                                               CM
                                                                      a        o
                                                                      n      e
                                                                                                o       e
                                                                                                        4) —
                                                                                                        r- 0) •
                                                                                        a a vi
                                                                                        •  A 4>
                           • (— i  ^ i/i e as        -^
                           i — u — o — ••    c n —
                           - O W *•—•«• kfl    — p- O
                           9    uEa<«"    •* =
                           u o c o oi c •*.    4i>«e
                           iawUU
                                                                         i
                                                                      a m
                                                                      e kk.
                           e oi
                                                                    -14-
                                                                                                                           07/14/89

-------
      u
      S
     0)
     at
     |

     VI
     Ol
     — O>

     Ifl I/I
     u e
     O> CL
     K>  Ol
     O  >
     Ol

     9 —
 W «« krt
 3   f~
 9 •* 01
 a an-
                  e
               •o c
                ft)
               -* o
                        £o£*£"is^».
              01        f- 19>|viu—  9C
              ee        —u—'W—c-O'-'o
              —  i. c    -o     i— MC— BO*
              too    « oi o   o> m    —  > c      -s 4>



 3*"      j« fc — 9    «••   eo»>—~«*i«vi«-       >••
 ^S      C O — .O    •— 41    > — 0) 01 u  vi —      — 01

    b»      • O>         *O Ol flO — ** —    X  u 3       0* — ^
 01—         >  4> 41      £ X 4> 41 — C    0>Ci/i   "O u 4i
 f ^      'C —  C C    vix   -O 'O   u—    l-  Q.      9."
 •^         4i •—  O O    >»           41 O >fl  O O  3    VIVIL.
    4)      —           4l---(T--.C.a.~CCO    »«- O

 O  '«|      41 II  fl C    C C C  • C   •— •- -O fB  O>   JtfOm

 _    v    •* 41         t k. — >«^ 9 ^ J< <— —•  Ol    9 — >i
 *—  vi 4>       >  Oi vi       O*** 4>9*   vi^'Q'Vf    BSO)
                  3.
                  w»

               -g.

    jJ si 01 3 («    o — en'e "c
 u-  -O = -C    — C«->flCO3C

      O    CT>    ^S'SviT^ —

 C — 's ^    yioivilj'O    ^ —
 31— •  u  •— e o> •   -* > i.
 —  U5*->IVI — >— — L.IVU9
                OOCi—
                  OCi—  ^'fl^SCu-CC^
                  »»ou— co'i.'fl^^— a
               4) 0
 II-
 1_ — O
                                      S
       5*   I
     ^f
  a oi g
  a > 5.
  u i> a.
     e  •
    u. (M
     o>
     u
a

v
               *••  3
               •O  VI
               ?*
     i— 19-0 O
      5 oi e L.
    i J- " e
        *ts
 C mi   u 9
£ £2 S &, =
                                                      * u e
                                                      ^ o o
                                                      n c I
                                                      oi
                                                                   I
                                                                   I
VI
3
0098h
                                             -15-
                                              07/14/89

-------
The  apparent  NOEL might  be  an artifact  resulting  from the difficulties  In
detecting  statistically  significant Increases  In  responses 1n  small  groups
of  animals  rather   than  a  lack  of  teratogenlc  activity at  these  doses.
Neubert and Dlllmann  (1972)  reported  that doses as  low as  8 mg/kg by gavage
had been shown to cause a significant  decrease In fetal body weight In mice.
    Several  other  studies  Involved the  use of  2,4,5-T  samples  containing
higher or  unknown  levels  of  TCOD  contamination, making them  less  useful  for
risk  assessment;  however,  these  studies  pointed out  that the  teratogenlc
potency  1n  mice varied  with  the  strain  of  mice used, the dosing schedule,
and  the  vehicle.   Based  on data presented In Table  3-1 and on  other  data In
mice,  1t  can be  concluded. that 2,4,5-T  was  more teratogenlc   1n  A/JAX  mice
than  1n  the  other  strains tested;  that  treatment  on gestation  days  11-14
produced a greater teratogenlc  response  than  did  treatment  on  gestation  days
11-13  or  12-15 at  the same or higher  doses;  and  that administration as  a
solution In DMSO  led to  a far  greater  response  than did  administration  as  a
suspension In sucrose solution.
    The effect of the  chemical  form In  which  the 2,4,5-T  was  administered on
teratogenlc  potency  to  mice  was  less  clear.   Frohberg  et al.  (1974)  sug-
gested that  the  butoxyethyl  ester  1s  less potent  than the add,  but  Neubert
and  Dlllmann  (1972)  reported  similar  potencies  for  the  acid  and  the butyl
ester.   No  firm conclusion can be  drawn, however,  because the TCDD  content
of these esters was not reported.
     Several studies with  rats  are presented  in  Table 3-2.   A review of these
studies  Indicates  that at doses of >100 mq/kg/day,  2,4,5-T containing  <0.5
ppm  TCDD may cause  maternal  toxldty,  fetotoxtcHy  and  skeletal  anomalies.
In  most  cases  these  skeletal  anomalies  were  relatively  mild  and  Included
0098h                               -16-                             07/14/89

-------
wavy Mbs, fused sternum, poor ossification and maligned  sternebrae  (Emerson
et al..  1970,  1971;  Khera and McKlnley,  1972;  Khera et a!., 1971;  Sparschu
et  al.,  1971).  These data  suggest  that  rats  are less  sensitive to  the
teratogenlc effects  of  2,4,5-T than mice,  1n  which doses >35 mg/kg consis-
tently produced cleft palates.  In  the  rat  studies,  a  dosage of  25 mg/kg/day
on days 6-15 of gestation appears  to be a NOEL  for teratogenlc and fetotoxlc
effects.
    Smith  et  al.  (1981)  conducted  a   3-generat1on  study  1n  which  2,4,5-T
(TCDO  content  <0.03 ppb) was administered In  the  diet  to  groups  of  10-16
male and 20-32 female  SO  rats  at  dosages  of 0,  3, 10 and  30 mg/kg/day.   Rats
were  4-6  weeks  old  Initially and  were fed  the diet  for 90  days  before
mating.   The   FI  and  F- rats were  mated at  the  age  of  -130  days.   No
treatment-related effects on  food  consumption,  body weight gain,  behavior,
appearance, organ weights,  or hlstologlcal  appearance of  liver,  kidneys  and
thymus  of  weanllmjs  were  observed.   There  were  no  consistent  treatment-
related  effects  on  fertility Index,  Utter  size at  birth,  weanling  body
weights  or sex  ratio of  offspring.   Reduced  21-day survival  of  pups  was
observed 1n the 10 and 30 mg/kg/day groups.   No adverse  effects  on reproduc-
tion  occurred at  3  mg/kg/day.    No  treatment-related  teratogenlc  effects
occurred at any dosage.
    Teratogenldty  studies with  other  species were  summarized In  Table 3-3.
Collins and Williams  (1971) studied teratogenlc effects of different 2,4,5-T
samples  (TCDO  content <0.1-4.5 ppm) In  hamsters  and  found that  Increasing
TCDD  levels  were  associated   with  decreased  fetal  viability  and  Increased
Incidences of  abnormalities/Utter.   Highly  purified  2,4,5-T  still  caused
abnormalities   at  doses of  100 mg/kg  and  caused  decreased  viability  at  40
mg/kg.   The   studies  with  other   species  In  Table  3-3  were   essentially
0098h                               -17-                             07/14/89

-------
negative for  teratogenlc  effects.   Dougherty  et al. (1973, 1975)  and  Wilson
(1971) did  not  observe teratogenlc effects  1n  primates receiving doses  <40
mg/kg.
3.3.2.   Inhalation.   Several  studies  have  related exposure  to  2,4,5-T  to
Increases In  birth  defects and abortions  In  human populations.   A  positive
association was found  In  populations  1n Oregon  (U.S.  EPA,  1979), New Zealand
(Hanify et  al.,  1981)  and Australia  (Field and  Kerr,  1979).   No association
was  found  1n Arkansas  (Nelson et  al., 1979),  Hungary (Thomas,  1980),  New
Zealand  (Department of  Health,  New  Zealand,  1980;  McQueen  et  al.,  1977;
Smith  et  al.,  1982)   and  Australia  (Aldred,  1978).    These  studies  do  not
demonstrate conclusively  that  2,4,5-T 1s teratogenlc  or fetotoxlc  In humans.
Pearn  (1985)  concluded  that  no ep1dem1olog1cal  data   Indicate  that  2,4,5-T
causes  congenital  malformations   In  humans.    The   normal   problems  with
ep1dem1olog1cal  data   are compounded  by  the  difficulty  1n  distinguishing
effects of 2,4,5-T from those of TCDD.
    Only  one  animal  study concerning  Inhalation  exposures  to 2,4,5-T  was
found, but  It was available only as an abstract.  In  this study, the butoxy-
ethyl ester of 2,4,5-T caused  unspecified  malformations In NMRI mice at >216
mg/m3  (140.4  mg/kg/day;   assuming  a  body  weight of 30 grams  and a  contin-
uous exposure) (Frohberg et al., 1974).
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    Although  ep1dem1olog1c  studies  have  been  performed with the  chloro-
phenoxy herbicides  (Section  4 1.2.),  these  studies did not  Investigate  the
Interactive effects of these compounds.   Neubert  and  Dlllmann (1972)  Inves-
tigated the  Interactions  of TCDD  and 2,4,5-T  In  teratogenesls  In mice.   It
was  not  clear   1f  2,4,5-T  potentiated the  teratogenlclty  of TCDD  or  1f
2,4,5-T was teratogenlc by Itself (see  Section 3.3.1.).


0098h                               -18-                             07/14/89

-------
                              4.   CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUNAN DATA
4.1.1.   Oral.   Data concerning  cardnogenlclty  of  2,4,5-T  to  humans  from
oral exposure could not be located In the available literature.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.   There  Is  much  data  associating  exposure  to  phenoxy
acid herbicides  and the  Incidence  of  cancer In  humans.   A detailed discus-
sion of  this  Information  Is  beyond  the scope of  this  document, but reviews
and  evaluations  have been  done  by IARC  (1982).   Scandinavian ep1dem1o1og1c
studies  summarized by  IARC   (1982)  Indicated  that occupational  exposure  to
phenoxy  add  herbicides was  associated  with an excess  risk  of the develop-
ment of  soft-tissue sarcomas  and malignant  lymphomas.   As  was  the case with
other ep1d1m1olog1cal data,  It Is Impossible to  separate  effects of 2,4,5-T
from  those of  other  phenoxy acid  herbicides  and  TCDD;  furthermore,  the
lengths  of  exposure and  exposure  levels were unknown.  Thus,  these studies
are not useful for quantitative risk assessment.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.  There are relatively  few studies concerning  cardnogenlclty
of 2,4,5-T  1n animals.   In  one study  (B1onet1cs  Research Laboratories,  Inc.,
1968; Innes et  a!., 1969), groups of  18 male  and 18 female mice of  each  of
two  strains (B6C3F1  and  B6AKF1)  received  gavage  doses  of  21.5  mg/kg/day
2,4,5-T  (TCDD content  not specified)  on days 7-28  of  age,  and  then were fed
a  diet  containing  60  ppm  2,4,5-T  for  18  months.  There  was  an  Increased
Incidence of hepatomas  In  treated male  B6C3F1 mice  relative to controls, but
this was  not  statistically significant.  No  other  treatment-related effects
on tumor Incidence were observed.
0098h                               -19-                             01/27/87

-------
    Muranyl-Kovacs et  al.  (1976)  exposed groups of  C3HF  and XVII/G mice  to
2,4,5-T  (TCOD  content  <0.05  ppm)  In  drinking   water   at  100   mg/l   (19
mg/kg/day) for 2  months  starting  at 6 weeks of  age  and then 1n the diet  at
80  ppm  (15.2  mg/kg/day)   until   the  mice  died  or  were  sacrificed  when
moribund.  Total  tumor  Incidence  was  Increased  In treated  C3HF  mice,  but
this  Increase  was   statistically   significant  only   In   treated  females.
Unusual  types of  tumors  appeared relatively  early  In  the  life of the treated
C3HF mice  compared  with controls;  the  authors  Interpreted  this as  an Indi-
cation of  the  cardnogenlclty of  2,4,5-T In mice.  No  specific  target organ
was affected, but there  was  a generalized  Increase 1n  rare tumors  1n treated
C3HF mice.
    Kociba et  al.  (1979) exposed  groups of  50 male and 50  female  SD rats  to
2,4,5-T  (TCDD  content  <0.33 ppb)  1n the diet that provided  dosages  of 3,  10
or  30  mg/kg/day  for  2  years.    The  authors  found  no  treatment-related
Increase  In  any  type of tumor.  A  re-evaluation of  the hlstologlcal samples
and  statistical  analyses,  however,  revealed  a  statistically  significant
Increase  In  squamous cell  carcinoma of the  tongue  In  male rats  receiving 30
mg/kg/day  (U.S.  EPA, 1981).   U.S.  EPA  (1981)  reviewed a  similar  or perhaps
the  same study with  rats  receiving these doses 1n  the diet and  reported a
statistically  significant  Increase  1n  testlcular tumors  In treated rats, but
stated that  these results  were questionable. U.S.  EPA (1981) concluded that
their  re-evaluation  of  the  Kociba  et  al.  (1979)   data  provided  "highly
suggestive"  evidence  of  the  cardnogenlclty  of  essentially pure  2,4,5-T;
however,  no  final judgement  or quantitative cardnogenlclty risk  assessment
was made because  similar findings were not reported 1n other studies.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Inhalation   cardnogenlclty  bloassays  could  not  be
located  1n the available literature.
0098h                               -20-                             07/14/89

-------
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    B1onet1cs Research Laboratories, Inc. (1968) reported that single subcu-
taneous Injections of 215  mg/kg  2,4,5-T  (98% pure) In dimethyl sulfoxlde at
28 days of  age  had  no effect on  tumor  Incidence 1n groups of 18 male and 18
female B6C3F1 and BGAKF1  mice.
    Negative results  have  generally  been obtained  with 2,4,5-T In bacterial
mutagenlclty assays.  Results  In other assays, Including yeast, DrosophHa.
mouse dominant  lethal assays,  and  j_n vivo and In  vitro mammalian mutagenlc-
lty assays were mixed (U.S. EPA,  1981).
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    IARC  (1982)  has  classified 2,4,5-T and  Us esters 1n Group 3, chemicals
that  cannot be  classified as  to  their  cardnogenldty  to  humans,  on the
basis of  Inadequate  evidence for cardnogenldty  In  humans  and animals and
Inadequate  evidence  from  short-term  tests.    It should  be  noted  that  IARC
(1982) classified occupational exposure  to  phenoxy add herbicides  In  Group
2B, probably  carcinogenic  to  humans,  on the  basis  of limited evidence for
cardnogenldty  In  humans.    Overall,  the  evidence  for  cardnogenldty of
2,4,5-T to  animals may most  appropriately be  considered "Inadequate."   Using
the U.S.  EPA (1986b)  guidelines, 2,4,5-T would be  placed  In  Group D, meaning
that  current  data   are   Inadequate  for  the  assessment   of  the  potential
cardnogenldty of 2,4,5-T.
0098h                               -21-                             08/14/89

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

    U.S. EPA  (1988)  recommended an RfD  of  0.01 mg/kg/day for  2,4,5-T  based
on a NOEL of  3 mg/kg/day In  a  2-year  rat feeding study (Koclba et al..  1979)
and a  3-generatlon  rat  feeding study  (Smith  et al.,  1981).   The LOAEL  In
both  studies  was  10  mg/kg/day,  which  caused  Increased  urinary  copropor-
phyrlns and decreased neonatal  survival, respectively.
    NAS  (1977)  recommended an  RfD  of  0.1  mg/kg/day  based  on  a NOAEL  of  10
mg/kg/day In  dogs.   This NOAEL was based on the study  by  Drill and Hlratzka
(1953)  1n  which mongrel  dogs  were fed  capsules containing 2,  5, 10  or  20
mg/kg/day  2,4,5-T  5 days/week  for  13  weeks.  Mortality  occurred  at  20
mg/kg/day.
    Both  ACGIH   (1986)   and  OSHA  (1983)  have  recommended  a  TLV-TWA  of  10
mg/m3  for   occupational  atmospheric  exposures  to  2,4,5-T.   This value  1s
based  on  animal  feeding  studies  and  extensive   use  experience  with  the
compound (ACGIH, 1986).
0098h                               -22-                             08/14/89

-------
                              6.  RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfD$)
6.1.1.   Oral.   Data from  several  subchronlc  studies  with  2,4,5-T  suggest
that  10 mg/kg/day   1s  a NOEL  and a suitable  basis  for  deriving an  oral
RfD.Q.   This  dosage was  a  NOEL   In  the  13-week  dog  study  by  Drill  and
Hlratzka (1953)  1n  which no adverse  effects  were  observed  1n dogs receiving
doses  of  2.5 or 10  mg/kg/day,  5 days/week,  while all  dogs  at  20 mg/kg/day
died.   NAS  (1977)  reported  90-day rat  NOELs of  10,  18.6  and  30 mg/kg/day
from  various  studies.   Gehrlng and  Betso  (1978) described  an  unpublished
90-day study  In  which Sprague-Dawley  rats  receiving 30  mg/kg/day 1n the diet
experienced  Increased   liver  and kidney  weights  and  small  but  significant
Increases  In SAP and  SGPT  levels,  but  no  adverse effects  occurred at  10
mg/kg/day.    Although 10  mg/kg/day  1s  not  the  highest  NOEL  below which  no
adverse effects  have been reported, 1t  appears  to  provide the best basis for
RfDSQ  derivation because  the  higher  NOEL   of  18.6 mg/kg/day   for  various
esters of  2,4,5-T  (Advisory Committee  on  2,4,5-T, 1971; NAS,  1977)  1s  very
close to the  20  mg/kg/day level  that  was  lethal to dogs (Drill and Hlratzka,
1953).  The  10 mg/kg/day subchronlc  NOEL  In rats  (Gehrlng and  Betso,  1978)
Is  the  best  basis  for  deriving an  RfDso-    If  this  value  Is divided by  an
uncertainty  factor   of  100  to   account  for  Interspedes  extrapolation  and
differences   1n   Individual  sensitivity,   the   resulting   RfDcn  1s   0.1
                                                                 oU
mg/kg/day or 7 mg/day for a  70 kg human.
6.1.2.   Inhalation.  Subchronlc Inhalation  data suitable  for derivation of
an RfDo  could not be located 1n the available literature.
0098h                               -23-                             02/07/90

-------
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
6.2.1.   Oral.  Several studies  defined  3 mg/kg/day as a chronic  oral  NOEL.
In  the  2-year  rat  study  by  Koclba  et  al.  (1979),  mild  kidney  effects
occurred at  10  mg/kg/day,  but  no adverse  effects  occurred at 3  mg/kg/day.
In the 3-generatlon rat study by  Smith et al.  (1981),  3 mg/kg/day  was a NOEL
for  reproductive   and   other  toxic  effects,  while  neonatal  survival  was
reduced  at  10 and  30  mg/kg/day.  Several  other  reproductlon/teratogenldty
studies  1n  rats,  mice  and  other  species support 3  mg/kg/day  as  a NOEL  for
these effects as  well.   Dividing the NOEL of 3 mg/kg/day from  the Koclba et
al. (1979) study  by an  uncertainty factor  of  300  to account for Interspecles
extrapolation,  deficiencies  1n   the  chronic toxldty  data  base and  differ-
ences  1n  Individual  human sensitivity results  In an RfDQ  of 0.01  mg/kg/day
or 0.7 mg/day for  a 70  kg human.
    CSs were calculated for several  effects observed  1n  the chronic toxlclty
and  reproductive  effects  experiments  with  2,4,5-T.  Because  of   the  rated
severity of  teratogenlc and  fetotoxlc effects  relative to  chronic toxldty
endpolnts  such  as  hyperplasla   and  Increased  organ  weights,  most  of  the
highest  CSs  could  be  obtained   using  data from  teratogenlclty/reproductlve
effects  studies.  Because  the contaminant TCDD Is also known  to cause these
effects,  however,  only  studies  using   2,4,5-T  samples  of known  low  TCDD
content were  considered appropriate  for  CS calculations.  These calculations
are  summarized  1n Table  6-1.   The highest CS  was  obtained using  data from
the  2-year  feeding  study by  Muranyl-Kovacs  et  al.  (1976)  1n which survival
time  was significantly reduced  1n male  C3HF  mice  receiving 80  ppm  1n  the
diet,  a level  resulting  In  a  dosage  of ~12  mg/kg/day  according   to  the
authors.   The calculated  RV. was 2.8,  and  the  effect  was assigned  an  RV
of 10, resulting  1n a maximum CS of 28 (see Table 6-1).
0098h                               -24-                             08/14/89

-------






















01
a
wi
e
^f
UJ
^^
(0
^E
^^
^^
j^*
^™
T

^^

CM
O
>«



^T
o
1—
Ol
f

o
*^
WI
Ol
^
o
u

Ol
*"*

o
I
^*

























Ol
u
c

Ol
Ol
at



CO
^J

0)
06








.**
u
£
*.
UJ











^g

oe


a —
* 5
C V.
II
X





Ol
en

^^

Ol
u
ai
s
a

IQ

4*
01

2
^ a»

o c^
^ ^

CO
to


*



•o
c
15 01 «-
•a <«
.e .x ex

«- Ol Ol
01 > ex
3 *" ^t
>.« *
•0 •— k.
O Ol 01 C
ja k. > o

T3 13 •—•>-•
01 01 3
wi wi • B
ifl >a <-• 5

k. k. 01 r-
U U •>- «-
01 C 01 C
Q f »«-


r-
^3

^_



^
on
in
CO






WI
e k.

Ol


«j r*
O ^H
>k ^

CO
^^
"

^



r
^ r™>
CX k. WI
O Ol •>-
k. e >
CX-- i—
O E Ol
u a.
•o
>• 01 r-
k. WI (Q
S"9 C
01 01
•- 1. k.
k. U
ace

•o
Ol * wi
WI WI -**
ifl C »-
01 *" WI
k. k. O
O >> Q.
e f oi
<-> Q.-0



^^

CM



l1"^
on
J^






01
WI
e k.

01


•a CM
en k.
J* O
*^ <*•


o —
•— -a

x-






WI



a


^;
fQ
—
Ol

^^ /^
»- CO

OO *™

CO
CO
CM

O
"~




'ifl
1
3
V*
!••
2
fl
e
o
01
c
•o
Ol
u
3
•a
Ol
at



^f

CM



f^
en





WI
c
O
Ol «-
C 01
^ c
Ol
>• en

^ CO
en k.
^ o
'v *^
?*•

o •-

u.
X







15


a
WI
u
ro >O
o en
i

e i—


3 •"
X Ol

en
f^
CM

O
r"





1
**

*^
^
•j
^
a
WI

•o
01
WI
rtj
Ol

u
Ol
a



09

CM



**!
CO
vO



j-
k.
4
01
CM
k.
O •—

*9
•<-> •&
Ol >.
•o .*


ex
CM
O i—
co —

X




Ol
u

s
u.

u



f^
o%

m
f^

o
at

a
•a
CO

o
'~


-
Ol
u
o
01 en
u c
e *-
01 k.
•0 Q.
U Ik
e <*.
•- o

•a e
Ol «-
WI
>0 01
Ol •"
k. n)
u ^™
— Q.




c ^
O •>-'

^^^^

•a 01
en


i"io

CO vO

u.




Ol
u

S

ae

CM

^2
e
e
" e
||

3 ^
01 •-
Z 0

in
iA
CO

CO






en

i

i«
^^
01


•a
Ol
01
k.

Ol
•o


.p
in

^^



OJ
^







WI
(« e
•o o

C "^

^J


J< O


i
eo vo

u.




Ol
u

E

ac
I
»

ai

1

^
o
^

c
i
o
**
i
c S
03 g
3
O
en
o •*
H o
k. ^
A»
£ o
u-
Vk ^
— -a

o s
u.
c
01 «-

3 -"
U •—
3
0) WI

«. *•

**
|f
•2 "*
*• ai

•** a.
= X
i"
*^ X)
WI f
•o .
IQ 01
U
•
o
o
|±i en
* c

si


= <«
0098h
-25-
07/14/89  .

-------
6.2.2.   Inhalation.   The  chronic   Inhalation   toxldty   data   reviewed   1n
Section  3.2.2.  are  not  useful  for  quantitative  risk  assessment.   In   an
epidemiology study,  Susklnd and Hertzberg  (1984) observed decreased  pulmo-
nary  functions,   ulcers  of  the  gastrointestinal  tract  and  an  Increased
Incidence of chloracne  1n workers exposed to  2,4,5-T  compared with  controls,
but exposure levels  and duration of  exposure were not quantified.   Experi-
ments with  chronic  exposure  of  laboratory  animals could  not  be located  1n
the available literature.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^)
    No  quantitative  estimates  of  carcinogenic  potency  have been  made  for
2,4,5-T because the Issue of Its cardnogenlcHy 1s still  1n  doubt.
0098h                               -26-                             02/07/90

-------
                                7.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American Conference  of Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).   1986.
Documentation  of  the  Threshold   Limit   Values.  5th   ed.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 549.

Advisory  Committee  on 2,4,5-T.   1971.   Report to  the Administrator  of  the
Environmental Protection Agency.  76 p.  (Cited 1n NAS, 1977)

Aldred, J.E.  1978.   Report  of  the  Consultative Council on Congenital  Abnor-
malities  1n  the Yarrom  District.   Minister of Health,  Melbourne,  Victoria,
Australia.  (Cited 1n M1lby et al., 1980)

Altom, J.D. and J.F.  Strltzke.   1973.  Degradation of  Dlcamba,  Plcloram  and
four phenoxy herbicides In soils.   Weed Sc1.  21:  556-560.

Beck, S.L.  1981.  Assessment of  adult  skeletons  to detect prenatal  exposure
to 2,4,5-T or Tr1flural1n 1n mice.  Teratology.  23: 33-55.

B1nns, W.  and  L.  Balls.   1971.  Nonteratogenlc effects  of  2,4,5-trlchloro-
phenoxyacetlc add  and  2,4,5-T  propylene  glycol   butyl  ester  herbicide  1n
sheep.  Teratology.  4: 245.

Blonetlcs  Research  Laboratories,   Inc.   1968.   Evaluation  of  carcinogenic,
teratogenlc and mutagenlc activities  of  selected  pesticides  and  Industrial
chemicals.  Vol.  1.  Carcinogenic  Study.   Prepared for  NCI,  Bethesda,  MD.
NTIS PB 223-159.
0098h                               -27-                             01/27/87

-------
Bovey, R.W.  and  J.R.  Baur.  1972.   Persistence  of 2,4,5-T In grasslands of
Texas.  Bull. Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.   8:  229-233.

Burton, J.A., T.H.  Gardiner  and L.S. Schanker.  1974.  Absorption  of  herbi-
cides from the rat lung.  Arch. Environ.  Health.   29(1):  31-33.

Byast, T.H.  and  R.J. Hance.   1975.   Degradation  of  2,4,5-T  by  South  Viet-
namese soils  Incubated  In the  laboratory.   Bull.  Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.
14: 71-76.

Chebotar,  N.A.   1980.  Cytogenetlc  and  morphological  changes  In  cogenesls
and  embryogenesls  Induced  by  chloHdlne  and  2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc
add  In  preovulatory  phase  of  melosls   In  albino  rats.  Genetlka  (Moscow).
16(7): 1220-1227.

Chernoff, N. and  R.J.  Kavlock.   1982.   An In  vivo teratology  screen utiliz-
ing pregnant mice.  J. Toxlcol. Environ.  Health.   10:  541-550.

Collins,   T.F.X.  and C.H.  Williams.  1971.  Teratogenlc studies with 2,4,5-T
and 2,4-D 1n the hamster.   Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.   6(6):  559-567.

Courtney,  K.D.    1977.   Prenatal  effects   of  herbicides  evaluation by  the
prenatal  development Index.  Arch. Environ.  Contam. Toxlcol.  6(1):  33-46.

Courtney,  K.D. and  J.A. Moore.   1971.   Teratology studies with  2,4,5-T  and
2,3,7,8-TCDD.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   20:  396.
0098h                               -28-                             01/27/87

-------
Courtney, K.D.,  D.W.  Gaylor,  M.D.  Hogan and H.L. Falk.   1970a.   Teratogenlc
evaluation of pesticides: Large-scale screening study.   Teratology.   3:  199.
                                           x
Courtney, K.D., M.D. Gaylor,  H.L. Hogan, et  al.   1970b.   Teratogenlc evalua-
tion of 2,4,5-T.  Science.  168: 864-866.

Department of  Health,  New Zealand.   1980.   Report to  the  Minister  of Health
of an  Investigation Into  allegations of an association between  human congen-
ital defects  and 2,4,5-T spraying  In  and  around teKultl.  New  Zealand  Med.
J.  p. 314-315.

Dougherty, W.H.,  F.  Coulston  and L. Goldberg.   1973.   Non-teratogen1c1ty  of
2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc  acid   1n  monkeys   (Macaca  mulatta).   Toxlcol.
Appl. Pharmacol.  25:  442.

Dougherty, W.J.,  M.  Herbst and  F.  Coulston.  1975.   The  non-teratogenlclty
of  2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc  add  In the rhesus monkey  (Macaca  Mulatta).
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.  13(4): 477-482.

Drill,  V.A.   and  T.  Hlratzka.  1953.   Tox1c1ty of  2,4-D and  2,4,5-T.   A
report on  their acute and  chronic  toxlclty  In dogs.   Ind. Hyg.  Occup.  Med.
7: 61-67.

Eaton,  D.L.   1982.   Biliary  excretion of 2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc  acid
In the rat.  Toxlcol.  Lett.   14: 175-181.
0098h                               -29-                             01/27/87

-------
Emerson, J.L., D.J. Thompson, C.G. Gerblg and V.B. Robinson.  1970.  Terato-
genlc  study  of  2,4,5-tr1chlorophenoxy-acet1c  add   In  the  rat.   Toxlcol.
Appl. Pharmacol.   17(1):  317.

Emerson, J.L., D.J.  Thompson, R.J.  Streblng,  C.G. Gerblg  and  B. Robinson.
1971.  Teratogenlc studies  of 2,4,5-T In  the  rat and rabbit.  Food Cosmet.
Toxlcol.  9: 395.

Erne, K.   1966.   Distribution and  elimination  of chlorinated phenoxyacetlc
acids 1n animals.   Acta Vet. Scand.   7:  240-256.

Ferry,  D.G.,  L.R.  Gazeley  and  I.R.  Edwards.  1982.   2,4,5-T absorption  In
chemical applicators.   Proc. Univ. Otago Med.  Sch. 60(2): 31-32.

Field,  B.  and C.   Kerr.   1979.    Herbicide  use  and Incidence of  neural-tube
defects.  Lancet.   1:  1341-1342.

Frohberg,  H., 3.  Glelch  and  A.  Hofmann.   1974.   Investigations   of   the
embryotoxlc effect of  2,4,5-T 1n NMRI mice.   Teratology.   10:  309.

Galnes,  T.B., J.F. Holson,  Jr.,  C.J.   Nelson  and H.J.  Schumacher.   1975.
Analysis of strain differences  In sensitivity and reproduc1bH1ty  of results
In assessing  2,4,5-T  teratogenldty  1n mice.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   33:
174-175.

Garten, C.T.  and  J.R. Trabalka.   1983.   Evaluation of models for  predicting
terrestrial food chain behavior  of  xenoblotlcs.   Environ. Scl. Techno!.   17:
590-595.
0098h                               -30-                            01/27/87

-------
Gehrlng,  P.O.  and  J.E.  Betso.   1978.   Phenoxy adds:  Effects  and fate  In
mammals.  Ecol. Bull.  27: 122-133.

Gehrlng,  P.J.,  C.G. Kramer,  B.A.  Schwetz,  3.Q.  Rose  and V.K.  Rowe.   1973.
Fate of  2,4,5-tMchlorophenoxyacetlc  add (2,4,5-T) following  oral  adminis-
tration to man.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  26(3): 352-361.

Hanlfy, G.A., P. Metcalf, C.L. Nobbs  and  K.J.  Worsley.   1981.   Aerial  spray-
Ing of  2,4,5-T and human birth malformations:  An  ep1dem1olog1cal  Investiga-
tion.   Science.  212: 349-351.

Hansch, C. and  A.J.  Leo.  1985.   MedChem Project  Issue  #26,  Pomona  College,
Claremont, CA.   (CAS 93-76-5)

Helling,  C.S.   1971.   Pesticide mobility  In soil.  II.  Applications of  soil
thin-layer chromatography.  Soil  Sd.  Soc. Am.  Proc.  35: 737-743.

IARC (International  Agency  for Research on Cancer).  1982.   IARC  Monographs
on  the  Evaluation  of  the Carcinogenic Risk  of Chemicals to Man.   Chemical
Industrial Processes and Industries  Associated with Cancer In  Humans.   WHO,
IARC,  Lyons,  France.  Suppl. 4, p. 235-238.

Innes,  J.R.M.,  B.M. inland, M.G.  Valerlo  and I.  Petrucelll.   1969.   Bloassay
of  pesticides   and  Industrial  chemicals  for  tumorlgenlclty   In  mice:  A
preliminary note.   J. Natl.  Cancer Inst.  42:  1101-1114.
0098h                                31-                              01/27/87

-------
Kenaga,  E.E.   1980.  Predicted  bloconcentratlon  factors and  soil sorptlon
coefficients  of  pesticides and  other  chemicals.   Ecotox.  Environ. Safety.
4: 26-28.

Khera,  K.S.  and  W.P.   McKlnley.    1972.    Pre-  and   postnatal   studies   on
2,4,5-tr1chlorophenoxyacet1c add,  2,4-d1chlorophenoxyacet1c add,  and  their
derivatives In rats.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   22(1):  14-28.

Khera,  K.S.,   B.L.  Huston  and  W.P.   McKlnley.   1971.   Pre- and  postnatal
studies  on  2,4,5-T, 2,4-D  and  derivatives  In Wlstar  rats.  Toxlcol.  Appl.
Pharmacol.  19: 369-370.

Koclba,  R.J.,  D.G.  Keyes,  R.W.  Llsowe,  et  al.   1979.  Results  of  2-year
chronic  toxlclty and  oncogenlc study of  rats   Ingesting  diets  containing
2,4,5-T.  Food Cosmet. Toxlcol.   17(3): 205-222.

Lyman,  W.J.,  W.F.   Reehe  and  D.H.  Rosenblatt.  1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical
Property  Estimation Methods,  Environmental  Behavior  of Organic  Compounds.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.   960 p.

McCall,  P.J.,  S.A.  Vrona  and  S.S.   Kelley.    1981.    Fate of   uniformly
carbon-14  ring labeled  2,4,5-tr1chlorophenoxyacet1c  acid and 2,4-d1chloro-
phenoxyacetlc acid.  J. AgMc.  Food Chem.   29(1):  100-107.

McQueen,  E.G., A.M.O.  Veale, W.S.  Alexander  and M.N. Bates.   1977.   2,4,5-T
and  human  birth defects.   Report of  the  Division  of  Public  Health,  New
Zealand  Dept. of Health.   (Cited 1n M1lby et  al.,  1980)


0098h                               -32-                             01/27/87

-------
M11by,  T.H.,  E.L.  Hustlng,  M.D. Whorton  and S.  Larson.   1980.   Potential
Health  Effects  Associated  with  the  Use of Phenoxy  Herbicides.   Prepared  for
the  National   Forest   Products   Association   by   the  Environmental   Health
Association, Inc., Berkeley, CA.

Muranyl-Kovacs, I., G.  Rudall and J.  Imbert.   1976.   Bloassay of 2,4,5-T for
carclnogenldty 1n mice.  Br. J. Cancer.  33:  626.

NAS  (National   Academy  of  Sciences).   1977.   Drinking Water  and  Health,
Washington,  DC.   Available  from Printing  and  Publishing  Office,  National
Academy of Sciences.

Nelson,  C.J.,   J.F.  Holson,  et al.   1979.   Retrospective  study  of  the
relationship between agricultural use  of  2,4,5-T  and  cleft  palate occurrence
1n Arkansas.  Teratology.   19: 377.

Neubert,  D.  and  I.  Dlllmann.   1972.   Embryotoxlc effects  In  mice  treated
with  2,4,5-T  and  2,3,7,8-TCDD.   Naunyn-Schm1ed1bergs  Arch.  Exp.  Pathol.
Pharmacol.  272: 243.

Nked1-K1zza, P.,  P.S.C.  Rao and  J.W.  Johnson.   1983.   Adsorption  of  dluron
and 2,4,5-T on soil particle-size separates.   J.  Environ. Qual.  12: 195-197.

NorMs,  L.A.    1981.   The  movement,   persistence  and  fate  of  the  phenoxy
herbicides and TCDD In forests.   Res.  Rev.  80:  70.
0098h                               -33-                             01/27/87

-------
NRCC (National Research Council Canada).  1978.  Phenoxy Herbicides  —  Their
Effects on  Environmental  Quality with  Accompanying Scientific Criteria  for
2,3,7,8-Tetrach1orod1benzo-p-d1ox1n   (TCDD).   NRCC  No.   16075.    Associate
Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental  Quality, Ottawa,  Canada.

O'Connor,  G.A.  and  P.J.  Wleranga.   1973.   The  persistence  of  2,4,5-T  In
greenhouse lyslmeter studies.  Proc. Soil  Sc1.  Soc.  Am.   37:  398-400.

OSHA (Occupational  Safety and  Health  Association).   1983.  OSHA Safety  and
Health Standards.  29 CFR 1910.1000.

Pearn,  J.H.   1985.  Herbicides  and congenital malformations:  A review  for
the paediatrician.  Aust.  Paedlatr.  0.   21(4):  237-242.

Piper,   W.N.,  J.Q.  Rose,  M.L.   Leng  and  P.J.  Gehrlng.    1973.   Fate  of
2,4,5-tMchlorophenoxyacetlc add (2,4,5-T) following oral administration to
rats and dogs.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   26(3):  339-351.

PUmmer,  J.R.   1972.   Fates  of  pesticides  1n environment.   In.: Proc.  2nd
lupac Congress Pest. Chem.  6: 47-76.

Que  Hee,  S.S.,  R.G. Futherland and G.  Zwelg.   1981.   The  phenoxy  alkanolc
herbicides.    Vol.   1.   Chemistry,   Analysis   and   Environmental   Pollution.
p. 51.  CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.

Relnbold, K.A.   1979.   Adsorption  of Energy-Related  Organic Pollutants:  A
Literature Review.  EPA 600/3-79-086.
0098h                               -34-                             01/27/87

-------
Roll, R.   1971.  Studies of  the  teratogenlc effect of  2,4,5-T  1n mice.  Food
Cosraet. Toxlcol.  9(5): 671-676.

Rosenburg,  A.  and  M.  Alexander.   1980.   2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxyacetlc acid
(2,4,5-T) decomposition 1n tropical soil and  Its cometabollsm  by bacteria In
vitro.  J. Agrlc. Food Chem.   28: 705-709.

Skurlatov,  Y.I.,  R.G.  Zepp  and  G.L.  Baughman.  1983.   Photolysis  rates of
(2,4,5-tMchlorophenoxy)   acetic   add  and  4-am1no-3,5,6-tr1chlorop1col1n1c
acid In natural waters.  J. Agrlc. Food  Chem.   31:  1065-1071.

Smith,  F.A.,  F.J.   Murray,  J.A.   John,  K.D.  NHschke, R.J.  Koclba  and B.A.
Schwetz.   1981.   Three-generation  reproduction   study   of  rats   Ingesting
2,4,5-tr1chlorophenoxyacet1c   add  1n  the   diet.    Food  Cosmet.  Toxlcol.
19(1): 41-45.

Smith,  A.M.,  D.O.   Fisher,  N. Pearce and  C.J. Chapman.   1982.  Congenital
defects and miscarriages among New Zealand 2,4,5-T sprayers.   Arch. Environ.
Health.  37: 197-200.

Sokollk,  I.Yu.   1973.   Effect of  2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc add and Its
butyl ester on embryogenesls  of rats.  Bull.  Exp. B1ol. Med.  76(7): 831-833.

Sparschu, G.L.,  F.L.  Dunn, R.W.  Llsowe and  V.K.  Rowe.   1971.   Study of the
effects  of  high   levels  of  2,4,5-tr1chlorophenoxyacet1c  add  on  fetal
development In the  rat.  Food Cosmet.  Toxlcol.   9:  527-530.
0098h                               -35-                             01/27/87

-------
Susklnd,  R.R.  and V.S.  Hertzberg.   1984.   Human  health  effects of  2,4,5-T
and Us toxic contaminants.  3. Am.  Med. Assoc.   251(18):  2372-2380.
                                                                                 9-
Thomas,  H.F.   1980.    2,4,5-T  use  and  congenital  malformation  rates  In
Hungary.  Lancet.  1:  214.
Thompson, D.J., J.L. Emerson and G.T.  Sparschu.   1971.   Study  of  the effects
of  2,4,5-trlchlorophenoxyacetlc acid   (2,4,5-T)  on  rat  and  rabbit  fetal
development.  Teratology.  4: 243.

U.S. EPA.   1979.   Report of Assessment of a  Field  Investigation  of  Six-year
Spontaneous  Abortion Rates  In  Three   Oregon  Areas  In Relation  to  Forest
2,4,5-T  Spray  Practice.   Prepared  by  the  Office  of  Toxic  Substances,
Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1980.   Guidelines and Methodology  for the  Preparation of  Health
Effect Assessment  Chapters of  the  Consent  Decree Water Criteria  Documents.
Federal Register.   45(231): 79347-79357.

U.S. EPA.   1981.   Risk  Assessment  on   (2,4.5-Trlchlorophenoxy) Acetic  Add,
(2,4,5-T),   2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxy   Proplonlc    Acid,   2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro-
dlbenzo-p-dloxln (TCDD).  EPA 600/6-81-003.   MTIS PB 81-234825.

U.S. EPA.   1984.   Methodology  and  Guidelines for Ranking  Chemicals  Based on
Chronic Toxlclty  Data.   Prepared by the  Office of Health  and Environmental
Assessment, Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for
for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.
0098h                               -36-                             08/14/89

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Graphical Exposure Modeling  System (GEMS) Fate of  Atmo-
spheric Pollutants (FAP).  Office of Toxic Substances, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   19865.    Guidelines   for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.  1988.  Integrated  Risk  Information  System (IRIS).   Reference Dose
for Oral  Exposure for  2,4,5-Trlchlorophenoxy Acetic  Add  (2,4,5-T).   Online.
(Verification date 01/20/88.)  Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office,
Cincinnati, OH.

Weed  Science  Society  of  America.   1979.   Herbicide  Handbook, 4th  ed.   WSSA,
Champaign, IL.  p. 418-421.

Wershaw, R.L., P.J. Burcar and M.C. Goldberg.   1969.  Interactions of  pesti-
cides with natural organic matter.  Environ. Sc1. Techno!.  3: 271-273.

Wilson, J.G.  1971.  Symposium on  the Use of Non-Human Primates  for Research
on  Problems  of Human  Reproduction,  Sukhumi,   USSR.   (Cited  In  Dougherty  et
al., 1975)
0098h                               -37-                             08/14/89

-------
        I
      in
      CM
a.
a.
 a>
.a
      CO
                          a>
                          u
                          a>
                       eo
                       00
                       o
                          co-
o o  >>
   <*-  <9
 x
 C  b.  0>
 co  O  E
 l_    •—
 cu o
<*- u-
 CO Q£
                          a>
                      •—  «/»
                       rO  O
                       I.  t/»
                       0)  O
                       X  X
                          u
                          a>
                          a.
                         CO
                                                                              CO
                                                                              CO
                                                                                  I/I
                                                                                  U
                                                                                        > r—
                                                                                        o en
                                                            O*

                                                            *- o
                                                            co en
                                                                         a>
                                                                             - CO
                                                                        (NJ
                                                                         i
                                                                                 CM CO
                                                                                  II CM
                                                                                  T3  II
                                                                                 » CO
                                                                                 ae o
                                            O>        C7>
                                      •O l_ *-    -O  O
                                      a> o co      —• O     <0 *J
                                      on           on  on
                                      O >>-O     O «-
                                      T3 *J CO    -O JC
                                         •r- t/1
                                      t_ r— re     t-  >»
                                      CU re CO     CO  CO
                                      .C —• l_    ^  C
                                      O» b. O
 I/I

•o
                                                                                            II
                                                                                            0)
                                                                                        u E
                                                                                        0) •«-
                                                                         >> i^
                                                                         re  t-
                                      •o >>
                                      •N. >e
                                      C7J-O
                                      ^           C7>
                                      'V O
                                      oicn
                                                                            o>
                                                                                 *J  on
                                                                                  
                                                            o
                                                                                  E    C7>(M
                                                                                  Q.CM S  U
                                                                                  o.        -a
                                                                                     l_ CM >
                                                                                 o o •— oe
                                                                                 CO <*- «-«•-<•
                                                                                  0)
                                                                                  u
                                      re  CO
                                      i— O
                                      
                                                                                                           re
                                                                                                           0)
                                                                                                           •o
                                                                                                           re
0098h
                                                  -38-
                                                                                      02/08/90

-------