OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000CEC\tiff\20013N3L.tif): Unspecified error

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  document  has  been  reviewed  1n  accordance with  the  U.S.  Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency's   peer   and administrative  review  policies  and
approved  for  publication.   Mention of  trade  names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                    PREFACE
    This report  summarizes  and evaluates Information relevant  to  a  prelimi-
nary  Interim assessment  of adverse  health effects  associated with  carbon
tetrachlorlde.  All estimates  of  acceptable Intakes  and  carcinogenic potency
presented  In  this  document  should be  considered  as preliminary and reflect
limited  resources   allocated   to  this  project.    Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and
environmental data  were located  through  on-line  literature searches  of  the
TOXLINE, CANCERLINE and the CHEMFATE/DATALOG data bases.  The  basic litera-
ture  searched  supporting  this  document  Is  current up to May,  1987.  Secon-
dary  sources of  Information have  also  been  relied  upon  1n the preparation of
this  report  and  represent  large-scale health assessment  efforts  that  entail
extensive  peer   and Agency  review.   The  following Office  of  Health  and
Environmental Assessment (OHEA) sources have been  extensively utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.    1980a.   Ambient  Water  Quality  Criteria  Document  for
    Carbon  Tetrachlorlde.   Prepared  by   the  Office   of   Health  and
    Environmental  Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria   and  Assessment
    Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for  the   Office  of Water  Regulations  and
    Standards, Washington,  DC.   EPA 440/5-80-026.   NTIS  PB81-117376.

    U.S. EPA.   1983a.   Reportable Quantity Document for Carbon  Tetra-
    chlorlde.   Prepared  by the   Office  of  Health  and  Environmental
    Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria and Assessment  Office,  Cincin-
    nati,  OH  for  the  Office of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,  Wash-
    ington, DC.

    U.S. EPA.  1983b.    Review  of  Toxlcologlc Data  In  Support  of Evalua-
    tion for  Carcinogenic  Potential  of Carbon Tetrachlorlde.   Prepared
    by  the Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Carcinogen
    Assessment Group,  Washington,  DC  for  the Office of Solid Waste  and
    Emergency Response,  Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.    1984a.   Health Assessment  Document  for  Carbon  Tetra-
    chlorlde.  Office of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environ-
    mental   Criteria  and   Assessment   Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.    EPA
    600/8-82-001F.   NTIS PB  85-124196.

    U.S. EPA.  1985a.   Assessment of  the Mutagenlc  Potential of  Carbon
    Dlsulflde,   Carbon   Tetrachlorlde,    Dlchloromethane,    Ethylene
    DIchloMde,  and Methyl  Bromide:  A Comparative Analysis  In  Relation
    to  Ethylene  Dlbromlde.   Office of Health and  Environmental  Assess-
    ment, Reproductive Effects  Assessment Group, Washington,  DC.

    U.S. EPA.  1986b.   Integrated Risk Information  System (IRIS).   Risk
    estimate for  carcinogens:  Carbon  Tetrachlorlde.  Online.   (Verifi-
    cation  date:  12/04/86).  Office of Health  and  Environmental  Assess-
    ment, Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH.
                                     111

-------
    The Intent In these assessments  1s  to  suggest  acceptable  exposure  levels
for  noncardnogens  and  risk   cancer   potency  estimates   for   carcinogens
whenever sufficient data were  available.   Values were not derived  or  larger
uncertainty  factors  were employed  when the  variable data  were limited  1n
scope   tending   to   generate  conservative   (I.e.,   protective)   estimates.
Nevertheless,  the  Interim values  presented  reflect  the  relative  degree  of
hazard or risk associated with exposure to  the chemlcal(s)  addressed.

    Whenever  possible,  two  categories  of values  have been estimated  for
systemic  toxicants   (toxicants   for  which  cancer   Is not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first,  RfD$   (formerly AIS)  or subchronlc  reference dose,  1s
an estimate of an exposure level  that  would not  be expected  to cause  adverse
effects when  exposure  occurs  during a limited  time  Interval (I.e.,  for  an
Interval that  does  not  constitute  a significant  portion  of  the  llfespan).
This type  of  exposure  estimate has  not been  extensively used, or  rigorously
defined, as  previous risk  assessment  efforts  have been primarily directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants  1n  ambient air  or water   where  lifetime
exposure   1s  assumed.   Animal   data   used  for  RFD$   estimates   generally
Include exposures with  durations of  30-90 days.  Subchronlc  human data  are
rarely  available.   Reported  exposures are  usually  from chronic  occupational
exposure  situations  or  from  reports  of  acute  accidental  exposure.   These
values  are   developed   for   both   Inhalation  (RfD$i)   and   oral  (RfD$o)
exposures.

    The  RfD  (formerly  AIC)  1s   similar   1n  concept  and  addresses  chronic
exposure.  It 1s an estimate of  an  exposure level  that  would not be expected
to cause  adverse effects when exposure occurs  for a significant  portion  of
the  llfespan  [see  U.S.  EPA  (1980b)  for a   discussion of this  concept].   The
RfD  can also  be  derived for the  noncardnogenlc health  effects  of compounds
which  are  also  carcinogenic.    The  RfD   1s  route-specific  and  estimates
acceptable  exposure  for either  oral  (RfDg)  or Inhalation  (RfDj) with  the
Implicit assumption that exposure by other   routes 1s Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncardnogens  have also  been  calculated
where  data  permitted.   These  values  are used  for  Identifying  reportable
quantities  and  the methodology  for their   development  Is  explained  In  U.S.
EPA  (1984b).

    For compounds  for  which there  1s  sufficient evidence  of carclnogenldty
q-|*s have  been computed, 1f  appropriate,  based on oral and  Inhalation  data
1f   available.   For  a  discussion  of   risk   assessment   methodology   for
carcinogens  refer  to U.S.  EPA (1980b).   Since  cancer  1s  a  process  that  Is
not  characterized  by a threshold,  any  exposure contributes  an  Increment  of
risk.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT


    In  order  to  place the  risk  assessment  evaluation  In proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.  The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this   series  as  well  as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    An  oral  RfD  of  7xlO~4  mg/kg/day  for  carbon  tetrachlorlde  can  be
derived based on  a  NOAEL  of 1 mg/kg/day, a conversion  factor  of  5/7,  and an
uncertainty  factor  of  1000  (to  allow  for  Interspecles  and   Intrahuman
variability  and  extrapolation   from   subchronlc   to   chronic duration  of
exposure)  In  a  subchronlc  gavage study In rats  by Bruckner  et  al.  (1986).
This  value  has  been  verified  by  the EPA  RfD Workgroups  (U.S. EPA,  1986b).
An  oral  RfD$  of  7xlO"3  mg/kg/day  can be  also  be derived  from the  same
study.

    Animal  oral  bloassay  data   In  three  species  (rats,  mice,  hamsters)
Indicate  that carbon  tetrachlorlde Is  a hepatic carcinogen.   Human  data are
limited and  equivocal.  U.S.  EPA (1984a) has  used data  from the following
for  quantitative  cancer   risk  estimation  purposes:   Delia  Porta  et  al.
(1961); Edwards et al.  (1942); NCI (1976)  (both rat and mouse).  Using these
data,   the  geometric  mean  of  the  upper  limit  unit  risk  estimates  Is
3.7xlO~*    (vg/lT1    with   a   corresponding    slope   factor   (q-|*)   of
1.3X10'1  (mg/kg/day)~*.

    U.S.  EPA  (1986b)  estimated  a slope factor for  Inhalation  exposure  of
5.2xlO~2  (mg/kg/day)"1 using  an  Inhalation  absorption  factor  of  40% and
the slope factor of l.SxlO'1 (mg/kg/day)'1 derived from the oral data.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Or. Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn were the Technical Project Monitors  and  Helen Ball  was the Project
Officer.  The final documents  In this  series  were  prepared  for the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response,  Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the  following  U.S. EPA offices  provided  review comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Human Health Assessment Group
         Office of A1r Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH

Technical  support  services  for  the  document series  was  provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Trlna Porter
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                       v1

-------
                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
1.
2.


3.










4.






5.
6.





7.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2 INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
3.4. TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
4.4. WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfDs) 	
6.2. REFERENCE DOSE (RfO) 	
6.3. CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q]*) 	
6.3.1. Oral 	
6.3.2. Inhalation 	
REFERENCES 	
Page
, , , 1
, , 4
. . . 4
, , 5
7
, , 7
. . . 7
, , 8
9
. . . 9
. . . 9
, , , 14
. . . 14
, , . 15
, . . 15
. . . 18
. . . 18
. . . 19
. . . 19
, , . 22
. . . 22
. . . 24
. . . 26
. . . 28
. . 28
. . . 28
. . . 28
. . . 28
. . . 29
. . . 30
APPENDIX: Summary Table for Carbon Tetrachlorlde 	   42

-------
LIST OF TABLES
No.
1-1
4-1
5-1
Title
Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and Half-lives
of Carbon Tetrachlorlde 	
Incidence of Liver Tumors In Mice Treated by Gavage with
Carbon Tetrachlorlde 1n Corn 011, 5 Days/Week for 78 Weeks. . .
Current Regulatory Standards and Criteria for Carbon
Tetrachlorlde 	
Paae
2
23
27

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS
ALP                     Alkaline phosphatase
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
bw                      Body weight
CS                      Composite Score
PEL                     Frank-effect level
LDH                     Lactate dehydrogenase
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                     Minimum effective dose
ppm                     Parts per million
RfD                     Reference dose
RfDj                    Inhalation reference dose
RfOg                    Oral reference dose
RfD$                    Subchronlc reference dose
RfD$i                   Subchronlc Inhalation reference dose
RfD$o                   Subchronlc oral reference dose
SGOT                    Serum glutamlc oxaloacetlc transamlnase
SGPT                    Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
STEL                    Short-term exposure limit
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
UDS                     Unscheduled DNA synthesis
                                      1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    The relevant  physical  and chemical properties and environmental  fate  of
carbon  tetrachlorlde  (CAS  No.  56-23-5),  also  known as  tetrachloromethane,
are shown In Table 1-1.
    Carbon  tetrachlorlde  1s  extremely stable  and  persistent  1n the  lower
atmosphere  and  troposphere.  The  primary  fate process  of  this  compound  Is
diffusion Into the stratosphere.   Once  In the  stratosphere,  1t  Is photolyzed
by  shorter  wavelength, higher  energy ultraviolet light, eventually  forming
phosgene as  the  principal  degradation product  (U.S.  EPA, 1984a).  Estimates
of  the  atmospheric half-life  of carbon tetrachlorlde range  from  18  years  to
60-100  years  (U.S.  EPA, 1984a).   It  has  been estimated that >90% of tropo-
spherlc  carbon   tetrachlorlde  will   eventually  reach  the   stratosphere
(Callahan  et  al., 1979).   The persistence  of carbon  tetrachlorlde In  the
atmosphere  Indicates  that  this  compound  may  be  transported long  distances
from  Its  emission source.   Global distribution  of  carbon   tetrachlorlde  1n
air Is reported to be nearly uniform (U.S.  EPA, 1984a).
    Carbon  tetrachlorlde dissolved  1n  water  does  not photodegrade or  oxidize
In  any  measurable amounts.   Volatilization  1s  the primary removal mechanism
for  carbon tetrachlorlde  from water  (U.S.  EPA,  1984a).   Although  carbon
tetrachlorlde  1s  relatively  Upophlllc,  there 1s  Uttle  tendency for  this
compound to bloaccumulate  1n  aquatic  or marine  organisms  (Neeley   et  al.,
1974).
    The half-life of  carbon  tetrachlorlde   1n  soil  was not  located 1n  the
available literature; however, evaporation 1s  expected to be  the  predominant
loss  mechanism  from  the   soil  surface.   This  compound  1s  resistant  to
blodegradatlon In subsurface  soils  (Wilson  and Wilson,  1985).  Based on  the


0039H                               -1-                              01/26/89

-------
                                  TABLE 1-1

           Selected Physical  and  Chemical  Properties  and  Half-lives
                           for  Carbon  TetrachloMde
      Properties
       Values
      Reference
Chemical class:


Molecular weight:

Vapor pressure:

Solubility 1n
  Mater:
  Organic solvent:

Octanol/water partition
coefficient:
BCF:
Half-lives In
  A1r:

  Water:
halogenated aliphatic
hydrocarbon

153.82

90 mm Hg at 20°C
757 mg/l at 25°C
mlsclble
676
(recommended value)

537

30 1n blueglll
(Lepomls macrochlrus)

17 1n fathead minnow
(Plmephales promelas)

71
18-100 years

0.3-3 days In river
30-300 days In lake
Callahan et al., 1979
Banerjee et al., 1980
HSDB, 1988
Hansch and Leo, 1985


Banerjee et al., 1980

U.S. EPA, 1980a


Velth et al., 1979


Sabljlc, 1984


U.S. EPA, 1984a

Zoeteman et al., 1980
0039H
       -2-
             01/26/89

-------
observed  slow blodegradatlon  of chloroform  (Wilson et  al.,  1983),  carbon
tetrachloMde  Is  expected  to  blodegrade even  slower because  of the  addi-
tional  chlorine  substitution  In this compound.  Consequently,  carbon  tetra-
chlorlde  Is  expected  to  leach  Into groundwater.  This has  been  confirmed  by
Page  (1981),  who  detected  carbon  tetrachloMde  with  a  64%  frequency  1n
groundwater.   Upon   entering   groundwater,   carbon   tetrachlorlde   will   be
persistent.   The  half-life  of  this compound  1n groundwater 1s  estimated  to
range from 30-300 days (Zoeteman et al., 1980).
0039H                               -3-                              01/26/89

-------
           2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    No  pertinent  studies  of  absorption  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  from  the
gastrointestinal tract  of  humans were  located  1n the available  literature.
It would be anticipated, however, that  carbon tetrachlorlde  Is  well  absorbed
from the gastrointestinal  tract  of  humans since  1t  Is readily  absorbed  from
the gastrointestinal tract of  animals,  and  there are many accounts  of  human
poisoning  resulting from  Ingestlon  of  carbon   tetrachlorlde.   A number  of
Investigators (Seawrlght and McLean, 1967; Marchand  et al.,  1970;  Reddrop et
al.,  1981)  have  studied   the  extent  of  absorption  of  orally  administered
doses  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde by  measuring the  excretion  of  radlolabeled
parent  compound and metabolites  In  the  expired air as  a  function of  time
following  administration   of   the  compound.  Typically,  the  percentage  of
absorption of an orally administered dose of  carbon  tetrachlorlde determined
In  this fashion Is  between 65 and 86%.   Seawrlght and Mclean  (1967)  treated
male  rats  with radlolabeled  carbon  tetrachlorlde  (4000 mg/kg)  by  1ntra-
gastrlc administration.  It was calculated  (U.S.  EPA, 1985b)  from the  amount
of  radioactivity found  In  the  exhaled air over  a 24-hour  period that >65% of
the  administered   dose  was  absorbed   from   the   gastrointestinal   tract.
Marchand et  al. (1970) administered radlolabeled carbon  tetrachlorlde  (3200
mg/kg)  to  male  rats by IntragastMc Intubation,  and  measured  exhaled  radio-
activity for  a  period of  up  to  10  hours following  dosing.  Of  the  adminis-
tered  radlolabeled  carbon, 83% was found 1n the exhaled air  10  hours  after
dosing,  which  led  to  the conclusion  that at  least 83%  of  the  dose  was
absorbed from the  gastrointestinal  tract over the 10-hour period  (U.S.  EPA,
1985b).  Using  a  similar   method of monitoring   radioactivity  In  the  exhaled
0039H                               -4-                              03/13/89

-------
air, Reddrop et  al.  (1981)  reported that absorption  of  carbon tetrachloMde
from the  gastrointestinal  tract of male  rats  given 2000 mg/kg was  at  least
60% over a 6-hour period following dosing.
    In  an early study,  Robblns  (1929)  Investigated  absorption of  carbon
tetrachlorlde  from  the  gastrointestinal  tract  of dogs.   He reported  that
"considerable  quantities"  were  absorbed from the  small   Intestine,  lesser
quantities  from the  colon  and  still  lesser  quantities  from the  stomach.
Lamson et  al.  (1923)  suggested that the  dynamics  and  kinetics of absorption
from  the   gastrointestinal  tract  may  vary   from  species  to  species.   They
observed  more  rapid  gastrointestinal  absorption  1n  rabbits  than  1n  dogs.
Nielsen and  Larsen  (1965) determined  that  both the  rate  and the amount  of
carbon tetrachlorlde absorbed  from the  gastrointestinal  tract were Increased
by concurrent 1ngest1on of fat or alcohol.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Although there  are  many  cases of  human  overexposure  to carbon  tetra-
chlorlde  vapor,  there are few quantitative studies of  pulmonary absorption
of  carbon  tetrachlorlde   1n  humans.   Lehmann   and  Schmldt-Kehl  (1936)
estimated  that  absorption across  the  lung  was -60%  In  humans based on  the
difference In carbon tetrachlorlde concentration In  Inhaled and  exhaled air.
Few  studies  on  pulmonary  absorption  In experimental  animals   were  found.
Nielsen  and  Larsen   (1965)  stated  that carbon   tetrachlorlde   1s  "readily
absorbed"  through  the lungs  but  did not specify  the species  studied  (U.S.
EPA, 1980a).   Lehmann and Hasegawa (1910) showed that  the  rate of absorption
decreased  with   duration  of  exposure.   von Oettlngen et  al. (1949,  1950)
studied  blood  concentrations  In  dogs  following  exposure  to 15 or 20  g/l
carbon tetrachlorlde  1n  air.   Peak blood concentrations of ~35  or  ~38 mg/8.
were attained  after  -300  minutes  of  exposure.   McColllster  et  al.  (1951)

0039H                               -5-                              01/26/89

-------
studied  the  absorption  of   carbon   tetrachlorlde  following  Inhalation  1n
monkeys.   Three  female monkeys  were exposed  to radlolabeled carbon  tetra-
chlorlde  (290 mg/m3)  for 139-300  minutes.   By determining  the  difference
1n concentration of  the compound In  the Inhaled and  exhaled air,  absorption
was  calculated  to  be  -30.4% of  the total amount  of carbon tetrachlorlde
Inhaled at  any  average absorption rate of  0.022 mg  carbon tetrachlor1de/kg/
minute.
 0039H                                -6-                              01/26/89

-------
                3.   TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   Reports  of  acute  toxldty  from  accidental,  medicinal  or
suicidal Ingestlon  of  carbon tetrachloMde  are available, but no reports of
subchronlc  toxldty  from Ingestlon of  the  compound  In  man were located In
the available  literature.    Delia  Porta  et  al.  (1961)  treated groups of 10
male  and 10  female  Syrian  golden  hamsters   by  gavage  with  12.26  mg/week
carbon  tetrachlorlde  1n corn  oil  for  30 weeks  (-12.3 mg/kg/day).   Before
treatment  was  completed,  50%  of the  hamsters  of  each  sex  died.    The
survivors all developed hepatocellular  carcinoma within  the next  13  weeks.
    Several   recent  studies  have  examined  the  effects  of  subchronlc oral
administration  of  carbon tetrachlorlde  1n  rats and  mice  (Bruckner et al.,
1986;  Condle  et al.,  1986;  Hayes  et  al.,  1986).    Bruckner  et  al.  (1986)
dosed  groups  of ~15  male  Sprague-Dawley rats  with  carbon tetrachlorlde In
corn  oil  by  gavage at  levels  of  1,  10 or  33 mg/kg,   5  times/week for 12
weeks.  The toxldty of  carbon tetrachlorlde was found  to  be  dose-dependent.
A  dose of  1  mg/kg  produced no  apparent adverse effects,  whereas  10 mg/kg
produced a  slight  but significant Increase 1n  sorbltol  dehydrogenase  activ-
ity and  33  mg/kg produced marked hepatotoxldty 1n  the form of cirrhosis.
Condle  et  al.  (1986)  studied  the  effects  of  the vehicle  (corn oil  versus
Tween-60) on  the subchronlc  toxldty of  carbon  tetrachlorlde In CD-I mice.
Carbon  tetrachlorlde  was administered  by gavage at  doses  of  1.2, 12 or  120
mg/kg  once  dally,  5  days/week  for 90 days.   Carbon tetrachlorlde  was more
toxic  when  administered In  corn  oil.   The  NOAEL  for  carbon  tetrachlorlde
administered  1n corn  oil  was  1.2 mg/kg and  the   corresponding  NOAEL   for
carbon  tetrachlorlde   administered  In  Tween-60 was  12  mg/kg.  A  greater
0039H                               -7-                             01/26/89

-------
degree of hepatotoxlclty, as measured by serum  enzyme  levels  and  hlstopatho-
loglc changes,  was  also observed  In  mice  treated with  12  and 120 mg/kg  of
carbon tetrachloMde  when  corn oil  was the  vehicle  than when Tween-60 was
the vehicle.
    Hayes et  al. (1986)  administered  carbon  tetrachlorlde  1n  corn  oil  by
gavage to groups of 20 male  and  20  female  CD-I  mice.  The  doses  used  were
12, 120, 540 and  1200 mg/kg and the  mice were dosed for  90  consecutive  days.
A  NOAEL  was not observed  In  this  study.   A  generally dose-related Increase
In serum enzyme  levels  (LDH,  SGPT, SGOT and  ALP) was  observed  In  both  sexes
at all dose levels.  Relative  liver  and spleen  weights were Increased at all
dosage levels  1n both  sexes  and   relative  thymus weights were  Increased  at
>540  mg/kg/day  1n  both  sexes.  Liver  damage was observed at  all doses  1n
both  sexes, with the severity and Intensity of  the lesions  Increasing  In a
dose-related fashion.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.   Prendergast  et  al.  (1967)  performed  two   studies  of
subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure  1n  animals.   In the first  experiment,  15
Hartley  guinea  pigs and monkeys  were  exposed  to 80  ppm (503  mg/m3)  carbon
tetrachlorlde   8 hours/day,   5   days/week   for  6  weeks   (30  exposures).
Increased mortality  (3/15  guinea  pigs,  1/3 monkeys) and  severe liver  damage
were  reported.   All the animals  showed a body weight loss.    In  the  second
experiment, several species of animals  were  exposed  to either 1 or 10 ppm  (6
or  63 mg/m3)  carbon  tetrachlorlde  continuously  for  90 days.   At  10  ppm,
guinea  pigs  showed  Increased mortality   (3/15  treated  vs.  2/314  colony
controls),  growth  depression  and   liver enlargement with fatty Infiltration,
hepatocytlc  degeneration,   flbroblastlc proliferation and  collagen  deposi-
tion.  Rats, monkeys and rabbits  at  10  ppm also experienced depressed growth
rates  and  similar  hlstopathologlcal  liver   lesions,  but  no  mortality.
0039H                               -8-                              01/26/89

-------
No  mortality or  gross  signs of  toxlclty  occurred  In  guinea  pigs,  rats,
monkeys or rabbits exposed to  1  ppm  carbon tetrachlorlde continuously for 90
days.   A  depression  of body  weight  gain was  observed only  1n rats.   No
changes were noted  1n  hematologlc  or  hlstologlc parameters  In  any  of  the
species tested.
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.  Pertinent  da.ta regarding chronic exposure  of man to carbon
tetrachlorlde were not  located In the available  literature.  A  2-year study
of  the toxldty  of  carbon   tetrachlorlde  was  performed  by Alumot  et  al.
(1976) who administered the compound  1n  the  diets of  rats at levels  of 0, 80
or 200 ppm.  Taking  Into account  the amount  of food  consumed and the loss of
carbon  tetrachlorlde  from the food  before  consumption,  a  dietary  level  of
200 ppm provided a dally dose  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde of 10-18  mg/kg bw.   At
this  dose  level  (10-18 mg/kg/day),  the  authors  found no biochemical  abnor-
malities attributable  to  carbon  tetrachlorlde exposure, and  this  dose level
was  Indicated to  be a  NOAEL  over  a  2-year period.   The  study was,  however,
criticized by U.S.  EPA  (1985b) because of the high  Incidence of  respiratory
Infection In the experimental  animals.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  NIOSH  (1975)  provided  an   1n-depth  discussion  of  the
pathology  of chronic  Inhalation  exposure of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  1n man;
however, since  exposure data  are  lacking,  It 1s not useful  In  risk assess-
ment.  The U.S. EPA  (1983a)  summarized human  studies  that  are more  relevant
to risk  assessment (see Section  4.1.).   Smyth  et al.  (1936) and Smyth  and
Smyth  (1935)  studied the  hematology,  kidney and liver  function  (parameters
not clearly  specified),  and  vision of carbon  tetrachlorlde-exposed  workers.
TWA exposures were estimated  to  range from  5-117  ppm  (31-736 mg/m3), with
peak  exposures  up  to a maximum  of 1680 ppm  (10,570  mg/m3).  Of  77  workers
0039H                               -9-                              01/26/89

-------
examined, 9 showed  severely  restricted  visual fields and 26  showed  slightly
restricted  visual  fields.    Of  67  men  tested,  13  had  elevated  Icterus
Indices.  Hematology, kidney  function and other  parameters  of liver  function
showed   no  significant   alteration   associated  with  exposure   to  carbon
tetrachlorlde.
    Moeller (1973) evaluated  the effects of  chronic  occupational  exposure to
carbon  tetrachlorlde on  several  ophthalmologlc Indices.   A  cohort  of  46
workers was exposed  from  1 hour/week to  1  hour/day  to an  unspecified concen-
tration  of carbon   tetrachlorlde  for  an  average of  7.7  years.    Of  these
workers,  28 were  found  to have  reduced  corneal sensitivity.  A group  of 62
locksmiths exposed  to 6.4-9.5 ppm  carbon tetrachlorlde for  a minimum  of 1-3
hours/day  and a  control  group  of  82  unexposed  persons  were  evaluated for
corneal  sensitivity  and   other visual  parameters.   Of  the  62  exposed  lock-
smiths,  43 had  reduced  corneal sensitivity,  4  had subnormal  dark  adaptation
corneas,  4 had  restricted outer  limits of white  visual fields,  15 had color
limits of  the visual field and 7 had  Instrument-detectable changes  1n color
perception.   Further  Information   comparing  the  control   groups  and  the
exposed groups was not presented 1n the available review.
    Barnes and  Jones (1967)  reported  an  Investigation of  27 workers  In  a
plant  manufacturing  polyfluorohydrocarbons   for refrigerators  from  carbon
tetrachlorlde   and   hydrofluoric  add.    This  manufacturing  process  1s
virtually  an  automated and  enclosed  system,  but  carbon tetrachlorlde  has to
be  delivered  by  road tanker, discharged  Into  the   receiving  tanks, and the
pipes  and tanks need periodic maintenance,  repairs  and cleaning.   It  1s on
these  occasions  that  the  worker   becomes   exposed.   However,  Information
concerning the  age,  sex,  job history and exposure  levels  of the workmen was
not  provided  1n  this reported.   Elevated urinary  uroblllnogen In  6/16 and


0039H                               -10-                             03/13/89

-------
elevated  urine  protein  1n  3/16 carbon  tetrachlorlde-exposed workers  were
observed,  whereas  all  11  unexposed  workers  were  tested  negative  for  both
tests.   Microscopic  and  macroscopic examination  of  the urine for  cells  and
casts were negative  although a  trace  of  albumen occurred 1n two.   Therefore,
the  authors  concluded  that  kidney damage  was  not  observed  In  this  study.
Zinc  turbidity  and average thymol  turbidity  tests were elevated  1n exposed
workers  (5.0  units  for  zinc  turbidity  and  4.0 units  for  thymol  turbidity)
compared  with  controls  (1.0  units  and 0.6  units,  respectively).   Carbon
tetrachlorlde-exposed  workers  also  experienced  elevated  serum  blllrubln
(average  1.36,   range  0.45-4.0)  and  slightly  elevated SGOT  (average  37.3,
range  25-48),  compared  with   controls  [0.46  (range  0.20-0.60)  for  serum
blllrubln  and 32.7  (range  27-38)  for  SGOT,  respectively].   Therefore,  the
authors  concluded  that liver damage was  a  feature In  exposed workmen.   Rabes
(1972) associated  significant elevations 1n  serum Iron  and glutamlc  dehydro-
genase with occupational exposure for  >5 years  to unspecified concentrations
of carbon tetrachloMde.
    Adams et  al.  (1952)  exposed guinea pigs and  rats to 5,  10, 25,  50,  100,
200  or  400 ppm  (31, 63, 157,  315, 629, 1258  or 2516 mg/m3) carbon  tetra-
chlorlde  for  7  hours/day,  5  days/week for up to  184  exposures over  a  period
of 258  days.   The numbers of  animals Involved  Initially  and  surviving  were
not  specified,  but  apparently  8-9 guinea pigs of each sex were tested  at
each concentration and ~15 rats  of  each  sex/group were  tested at  dosages  >25
ppm, 20  rats  of each sex were tested at 10 ppm,  and  23 females and  26  males
were exposed to 5 ppm carbon  tetrachloMde.
    Mortality among  guinea pigs was high 1n the  200  ppm group and  >50% died
In  the   400  ppm group.   Survivors had  elevated  kidney and  liver  weights,
0039H                               -11-                             03/13/89

-------
fatty degeneration  and  cirrhosis of the  liver.   Guinea pigs  showed  hepato-
megaly at  all  concentrations  tested, moderate hepatic  fatty  degeneration  at
>10 ppm  and  moderate liver cirrhosis  at  >25 ppm.   At  400 ppm, >50% of  the
rats  died.   Hepatomegaly  was   observed   In  all  exposed  rats,  but  liver
cirrhosis was not detected at exposure concentrations <50 ppm.
    In another  part of the  study,  two rabbits of  each sex were  exposed  to
10, 25,  50 or 100  ppm  carbon tetrachlorlde 7 hours/day,  5  days/week (Adams
et a!.,  1952). Exposure to  25 ppm,  178 times  (248 days) resulted 1n moderate
fatty liver degeneration and  cirrhosis.   At 50 and  100  ppm,  decreased growth
rate, Increased kidney weights and  Increased  blood  clotting  time (Indicative
of liver damage) were observed.
    Adams  et  al.  (1952)  also exposed groups of two  monkeys  to 25,  50 or  100
ppm carbon tetrachlorlde  by the  same schedule 148-198  times  (~30-4Q  weeks).
No abnormal  findings were  reported  In  monkeys  exposed  to 25  ppm.   Exposure
to 50 ppm  resulted  In weight loss and  exposure to  100  ppm resulted In "some
Indications  of  microscopic  liver   change."   In   this  study,  guinea  pigs
appeared to be  the  most  sensitive  species.  Moderate (presumably reversible)
hepatomegaly  occurred at  all  exposures tested, but  evidence  of fatty degen-
eration  was not  noted until concentrations reached  10  ppm.   For this study,
5 ppm carbon tetrachlorlde  In guinea pigs constituted a LOAEL.
    Smyth  and  Smyth (1935) and  Smyth  et  al.  (1936)  exposed  groups of 22-24
guinea  pigs   to  0,   50,  100,  200  or  400  ppm  (0,  315, 629,  1258  or  2516
mg/m3)  carbon tetrachlorlde  8  hours/day,  4-6  days/week  for  periods of  up
to 321 days;  however, because all  guinea  pigs exposed to >100 ppm died by 94
days  of  age,  the experiment was redesigned.  In  the second  trial, groups of
15  or  16 guinea  pigs  were exposed  to  25,  50,  100  or  200  ppm carbon tetra-
chlorlde for  8 hours/day,  5  days/week  for a total  of  10.5  months.  A group


0039H                                -12-                             03/13/89

-------
of  7  unexposed guinea  pigs  served as  controls.   All  animals  1n  the second
trial were provided with a high  calcium diet.   In the 0, 25, 50, 100 and 200
ppm  exposed  groups,  0/7,  12/15,  9/16,  11/16  and  11/15  guinea  pigs  died,
respectively.   In  addition   to  the  usual  hepatic  pathology,  optic  nerve
degeneration was  noted  1n  1  or  2  guinea  pigs  In  each  exposure group.  Fatty
degeneration of  the ocular muscles was  observed  In 3-6 guinea  pigs  In each
exposed group.
    Groups of  24  Wlstar  rats were  exposed to 0,  50,  100,  200 or  400  ppm
carbon tetrachlorlde for 8 hours/day,  5  days/week for  10.5 months  (Smyth and
Smyth, 1935; Smyth et  al., 1936).  No  significant  Increase  1n mortality was
observed.  Liver  degeneration,  regeneration and  cirrhosis were observed  1n
rats  exposed  to  >50  ppm  carbon  tetrachlorlde.   Degeneration of  the myelln
sheath of  the  sciatic  nerve  and degenerative  changes  In  ocular muscles,  as
well as unspecified kidney damage, were  also observed  In rats exposed to >50
ppm carbon tetrachlorlde.
    Smyth and Smyth (1935) and Smyth  et  al. (1936)  also exposed four monkeys
to  50  ppm and three monkeys  to  200  ppm carbon tetrachlorlde  8  hours/day,  5
days/week  for  93-231   days.    Nerve   tissue appeared  normal   in all  50  ppm
exposed  monkeys;   however,  two  of the  monkeys  exposed to  200 ppm showed
damage  to  the  sciatic nerve.   Cloudy  swelling of  the  kidney  and  fatty
changes  In  the   liver  were  noted  1n rats exposed  to >50  ppm.   A 28-day
recovery period demonstrated  the reversible nature  of these  mild  liver  and
kidney changes.
    Carbon tetrachlorlde  has   been found  to cause  effects primarily on  the
liver, kidney  and central nervous  system  (Smyth  and  Smyth,  1935;  Smyth  et
al., 1936).  Effects on the central nervous system  are usually rapid and the
most common effects are headache,  dizziness, vomiting  and  nausea  (Barnes  and
0039H                               -13-                             03/13/89

-------
Jones, 1967).   In  severe cases,  stupor  or  coma  can occur.  However,  these
effects are often reversible except In severe cases  when  permanent  damage  to
nerve  cells  can  occur.   The  principal  clinical  signs  of  liver  Injury
following  exposure  to  carbon  tetrachloMde  are  swollen  and tender  liver,
elevated levels  of hepatic enzymes  In the  serum,  elevated  serum  blllrubln
levels and  decreased  serum levels  of liver  proteins.   Repeated or  chronic
exposure often leads to flbrosls or cirrhosis (Adams  et al.,  1952;  Smyth and
Smyth, 1935;  Smyth  et al., 1936).  Nephritis  and nephrosls  are  also  common
effects  following  exposure  to carbon  tetrachlorlde  with  ollguria  or  anurla
developed within hours to days after  exposure (Smetana, 1939).   Both hepatic
and  renal   effects  following  carbon  tetrachlorlde   exposure are  generally
reversible  because  both organs  can  repair  damaged   cells  and  replace  dead
tissue (Adams et al.,  1952;  Smyth and  Smyth,  1935; Smyth  et al.,  1936).
    In  experimental  animals,   guinea  pigs   have  been   found   to   be  more
sensitive  to the  toxic  effects  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  than  are rats  or
monkeys (Smyth and Smyth, 1935;  Smyth- et al., 1936;  Adams  et al.,  1952).
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   No  reports were  located on  developmental and  reproductive
effects  1n  humans  following  oral exposure to carbon  tetrachlorlde.  Twenty-
nine  pregnant  rats  were  administered,  by  gavage,  0.6-0.9 cc/day  carbon
tetrachlorlde during gestation  (Wilson,  1954).  Marked maternal  toxldty and
total  resorptlon of fetuses  1n  some  animals were  observed, but no terato-
genlc effects or other adverse effects were  apparent  In  surviving offspring.
Administration of  carbon  tetrachlorlde In the  diet  of rats  does not  appear
to  affect   their  reproductive  capacity.  The  reproductive activity of male
and  female rats  fed  80 or  200 ppm  In  the  diet over a  2-year period was
generally unaffected by the treatment (Alumot et al., 1976).


0039H                               -14-                             03/13/89

-------
3.3.2.   Inhalation.   No  reports were  located  regarding  developmental  and
reproductive  effects  1n   humans  following   Inhalation  exposure  to  carbon
tetrachlorlde.  Schwetz et  al.  (1974) exposed groups  of  Sprague-Dawley rats
to  300  or  1000  ppm  carbon  tetrachlorlde for  7 hours/day  on days  6-15 of
gestation.   Maternal  weight  loss  and  clear maternal  hepatotoxlclty  were
observed; however,  no  effect  on conception,  number of  Implants  or  number of
resorptlons  was   apparent.    A   significant   decrease   In  body  weights  and
crown-rump  lengths  was found In  fetuses  from dams exposed  to either  300 or
1000  ppm  (1887-6291 mg/m3)  carbon  tetrachlorlde as compared  with  controls.
Gross examination  revealed  no anatomical or  developmental  anomalies;  micro-
scopic  examination  revealed  delayed ossification  of  the   sternebrae.   The
authors concluded  that carbon tetrachlorlde  was  not  teratogenlc to  rats at
these exposures, although  fetal  toxldty was observed.  Adams et  al.  (1952)
noted moderate  to  marked degeneration  of testlcular  germinal epithelium In
rats exposed repeatedly to >200 ppm of carbon tetrachlorlde.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    In  the  early  1900s,  carbon  tetrachlorlde was  used as  an  anthelmlntlc,
particularly  against  hookworm,  In  both humans  and  animals.   Sm1ll1e  and
Pessoa  (1923)  studied  severe  carbon tetrachlorlde-lnduced  toxlclty  In  two
alcoholics  In  a  group  of  34 persons  treated with carbon  tetrachlorlde  for
ancylostomlasls.    Since  then,   other   Investigators   (Guild  et  al.,  1958;
McGuIre, 1932; Smetana, 1939; Gray,  1947) have observed  that chronic alcohol
1ngest1on exacerbates  carbon tetrachlorlde-lnduced  toxldty resulting  from
single  medicinal  doses,  von Oettlngen  (1964)  reported that  habitual  users
or  occasional  users of alcoholic  beverages  became more  seriously  111  when
exposed to carbon  tetrachlorlde than those who do not  drink  alcohol.
0039H                               -15-                             03/13/89

-------
    Tralger  and   Plaa   (1971)   Investigated  the  potentlatlon  of   carbon
tetrachlorlde  toxlclty  by methanol,  ethanol and  Uopropanol  1n rats.   The
activity  of  SGPT  was  monitored  to  evaluate  hepatotoxldty.   All  three
alcohols potentiated  the  toxlclty  of carbon tetrachlorlde, with  Isopropanol
being the most potent.  Maximum potentlatlon was  observed  when  alcohols  were
administered 18  hours  before carbon tetrachlorlde exposure.  Neither  carbon
tetrachlorlde  nor  the  alcohols alone  elevated  SGPT  levels.   We1  et  al.
(1971)  Investigated  the potentlatlon  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde-lnduced  hepato-
toxldty by  ethanol and  cold.   Rats were  pretreated with ethanol and  sub-
jected  for  18  hours to a  temperature of 4°C.   Elevated SGPT Indicated  that
ethanol  and   exposure  to  cold   potentiated   carbon  tetrachlorlde-lnduced
toxlclty.  The authors postulated  that the  ethanol could  release noreplneph-
rlne  which  1n  turn  Increased  the  susceptibility of  the liver  to  carbon
tetrachlorlde.   Cornish and Adefuln  (1966)  reported  that  ethanol  Ingestlon
potentiated  the   toxldty  of subsequent  exposure to carbon  tetrachlorlde.
Sixteen  to  eighteen hours after pretreatment with a  single dose  of  ethanol
(5 g/kg),  rats were exposed to carbon tetrachlorlde  vapor  (100 or  1000 ppm)
for  2  hours.   Twenty-four  hours  after  exposure, SGOT   activities  1n  the
ethanol-pretreated  rats were 2.4- and 8.5-fold  higher  than 1n  control  rats
(not given ethanol) at the 100 and 1000 ppm exposure  levels, respectively.
    Alcohol  Ingestlon was  suspected  to  play   a significant  role  In  the
toxlclty  of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  from  nonmedlclnal  exposure (Abbott  and
Miller,  1948),  particularly when  renal failure occurred.   The  ACGIH  (1986b)
suggested  that ethanol and other substances  (e.g.,  barbiturates and  poly-
chlorinated  blphenyls)  Increase   the  toxldty  of carbon tetrachlorlde  by
Inducing  the synthesis of one or  more mlcrosomal enzymes Involved  1n the
metabolic activation of carbon tetrachlorlde.
0039H                               -16-                             03/13/89

-------
    Hafeman and Hoekstra  (1977)  reported  that  rats  given  a  diet supplemented
with  vitamin  E,   selenium  and  methlonlne  were  protected  against  carbon
tetrachlorlde-lnduced  toxldty.   By monitoring  the evolution  of ethane,  a
peroxldatlon  product  of  certain   unsaturated  fatty  acids,  these  authors
concluded  that  methlonlne, vitamin  E  and selenium protected against  carbon
tetrachlorlde-lnduced  llpld  peroxldatlon,   probably  by  maintaining  Intra-
cellular glutathlone and glutathlone peroxldase.
0039H                               -17-                             03/13/89

-------
                             4.  CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
    A few  cases  of  liver  cancer  associated with  exposure to carbon  tetra-
chloMde have been  reported, but  no epldemlologlcal studies useful for  risk
assessment were  located  1n the available  literature.   Slmler  et al.  (1964)
reported  the  case  of  a fireman  who developed  epHhelloma of  the  liver  4
years  after  being  acutely  poisoned by  carbon tetrachloMde.   Tracey  and
Sherlock (1968)  suggested  that hepatocellular carcinoma  1n  a  59-year-old  man
was developed 7  years  after  a  5-day exposure to carbon -tetrachlorlde,  which
was used to clean his  rug.   The man did  not Ingest alcohol  after  exposure to
carbon  tetrachlorlde,  but  had  Ingested  It  before exposure.   Blair  et  al.
(1979)  reported  87  cancer  deaths  In a group of 330 laundry and  dry cleaning
workers 1n which 67.9  cancer deaths  would  have  been expected.   The malignant
neoplasms  reported  Included  lung,  cervical and liver cancers,  and leukemia.
The   proportionate   mortality   ratio   [PMR   =   (obsverved   death/expected
death)xlOO]  for   deaths  associated  with  malignant  neoplasms  was  128  and
statistically  significant  (x2=6.423,  1  degree  of freedom,  significant  at
p<0.05).   However,   1t  Is  difficult  to  conclude  that   the  elevated  PMR  Is
Indicative of  an excess risk of  cardnogenldty  In this study.  One  of  the
compounding  factors of  the  paper  was that the causes  of  death 1n  workers
group was  compared  with that of  U.S.  population  deaths,  Instead of  another
working   population   to  control   for   the    "healthy  worker  effect."
Additionally,  concurrent  exposure  to   other  workroom  chemicals precluded
attributing   the   observed   Increase   1n   cancer  Incidence   to   carbon
tetrachlorlde alone.   Therefore,  one can only conclude  from  this study that
there  1s  a need for additional  work on  this  occupational group to  clarify
the Issue  raised.
0039H                               -18-                             03/17/89

-------
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.   Sufficient  evidence  for  the  carclnogenldty  of   carbon
tetrachlorlde  1n  laboratory  animals  exists  In  the  available  literature.
Many  early  studies, although  too short  In  duration to  be  useful  for  risk
assessment, demonstrated  the  hepatocardnogenldty of  carbon  tetrachlorlde.
Edwards  (1941)  administered  by gavage 0.1 ml  of a 40% carbon  tetrachlorlde
solution  In  olive  oil  to C3H  and A-stra1n  mice  2-3  times/week for  23-58
doses.   Necropsies  performed  2-147   days  after   the  last  administration
revealed a progression  of  events  beginning with liver  necrosis,  followed  by
cirrhosis and eventually  hepatomas  1n C«H  mice.   Hepatomas  were  found  In
126/143  C3H  and all  54 A-stra1n  mice.   Delia  Porta  et al.  (1961)  treated
five  Syrian  golden hamsters  of  each  sex  with  30  weekly doses of  6.25-12.5
yl  (10-20  mg)  carbon  tetrachlorlde.   Liver  cell  carcinomas  were  found  1n
all hamsters  (five/sex) that  survived  >10 weeks after  the end of treatment.
    Edwards et  al. (1942)  performed  a  study  with Inbred L mice,  a  strain
with  an extremely  low  rate   of   spontaneous  hepatomas, 2.5-3.5  months  or
3.5-7.5  months  of  age  at the  start  of  the  experiment.  Mice,  8-39/group,
were  treated  by gavage with  46  doses of  carbon tetrachlorlde  (0.1  mil  of  a
40%  solution  of carbon  tetrachloMde/dose)  over a  4-month  period  and  were
killed  and  necropsled  3-3.5  months  after  the last   treatment.   Hepatomas
developed In  7/15  younger  male mice (47%), 21/39  older  male mice (54%),  3/8
younger  females  (38%) and  3/11 older  females  (27%),  In  comparison with 2/152
(1%)  1n untreated  mice.  Therefore,  strain  L male  and female  mice  were
highly  susceptible  to  the Induction  of  hepatomas  by  carbon  tetrachlorlde,
and male mice were slightly more susceptible  than female mice.
    Edwards and Dalton  (1942)  Investigated the  Induction  of  cirrhosis  of  the
liver  and  hepatomas In  mice  following exposure to  high-dose, low-dose  and
limited  treatment  with  carbon  tetrachlorlde.   For   high-dose  treatment,

0039H                               -19-                             03/17/89

-------
strains C3H,  A, Y  and C  (1-5 months  of  age) were  given 0.1  ml  of a  40%
solution of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  In  olive oil by  gavage  2 or  3  times/week
for a  total  number  of 23-58  treatments.   Incidences  of hepatoma as  well  as
cirrhosis  were  significantly  Increased  1n all  four  strains  of mice.   For
low-dose treatment, 58  strain A female mice  were  given 0.1 ml  of  5% carbon
tetrachlorlde 1n olive oil, by gavage,  3  times/week for 2  months.   The total
dose of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  administered In  the  low-dose treatment  group
(0.125-0.145  ml) 1s  comparable  to  the  total dose  used  In  the  high-dose
treatment   group  (0.120  ml).   The  Incidences  of  hepatoma,  as   well   as
cirrhosis,  were  significantly Increased  In  the low-dose  group.  The tumors
of  the  liver  observed  were  morphologically  similar  in  both   high- and
low-dose treatment  groups.   Limited  treatment Involved dosing  of  strain  A
mice   with   0.04,   0.01   or   0.005  ml   of   carbon   tetrachlorlde   (21-62
mice/group,  1-3 treatments/animal).   No  hepatoma  was  observed In  animals
exposed to limited dose.
    Eschenbrenner and  Miller  (1944)  administered  30  doses  of  0.16,  0.32,
0.64,  1.27  or 2.54 g  carbon  tetrachlor1de/kg bw by  gavage to  groups  of  60
strain A mice.   The Interval  between doses  varied from 1-5 days;  thus,  the
treatment period varied from  30-150  days.   The  Incidence of hepatomas  was
23/60, 23/60, 25/59, 32/60 and 33/60  1n the  five  groups, respectively, but a
majority of  tumors  at  each dose level  occurred In  groups  treated  every 3 or
4 days.  In  a  later study,  Eschenbrenner  and  Miller (1946) demonstrated that
single  gavage doses of  12.5  »il/kg,  but  not 6.25 yl/kg  would cause  liver
cell  necrosis  1n  both male  and  female  strain A  mice.   Administration  of
6.25,  12.5,  25 or 50  pl/kg/day  for  120 days  resulted  1n  hepatoma  formation
1n  mice  exposed to >12.5 yl/day.   Other  mice were given  30 doses  of 25,  50
or  100 pi/kg  at 4-day  Intervals.   Microscopic  examination  revealed  small
hepatomas  1n  2/10  mice  given  25  pi/kg.   Grossly  visible  tumors  were

0039H                               -20-                             03/17/89

-------
present In  the  higher  dosed groups.  These Investigators  theorized  that  the
necrotlzlng  action  of carbon  tetrachloMde on  the liver  was an  Important
factor In the development of a carcinogenic response.
    NIOSH  (1975)  and  U.S.  EPA  (1980a)  discussed other  short-term  carclno-
genlclty  studies  with  carbon  tetrachlorlde,  but  since  they  provide  no
additional  Information and  are not useful for risk assessment,  they are  not
Included here.
    In an NCI-sponsored bloassay  {NCI, 1976; Welsberger,  1977),  groups  of 50
male  and  50  female  Osborne-Mendel  rats   were  treated  by gavage  5  days/week
with  carbon  tetrachlorlde  In corn  oil  (47 or 94  mg/kg  for males,  or  80 or
160 mg/kg  for females) for  78 weeks.   Vehicle control  groups  consisting of
100 males and 100  females  were maintained.  Observations were  continued  for
33  additional  weeks  following   cessation   of   treatment.    Survival   data
Indicate  that excessive  mortality  occurred  In high-dose  female  rats  by 78
weeks and 1n  high-dose male  rats  at termination.   Although  a  slight  Increase
1n  the  Incidence of  hepatocellular carcinomas was noted In  both males  and
females, a clear dose-related response could not  be demonstrated.
    Mice were also  Included In  the NCI  (1976) bloassay.  Groups of  50 male
and 50 female B6C3F1 mice were treated by gavage  with  1250 or  2500 mg carbon
tetrachlorlde 1n corn  oil/kg bw/day, 5 days/week  for 78  weeks.   Observations
continued for  an  additional 13 weeks.   Vehicle  control  groups consisted of
20 mice/sex.  All mice were necropsled.   By the  end of  the 78-week  exposure
period,  most carbon  tetrachlorlde-exposed mice  died.   Most  carbon  tetra-
chlorlde-treated mice  had  hepatocellular carcinomas  (95-100%).   The  first
carcinomas  In female mice were  found  at 16 weeks  and 19 weeks  In  low-  and
high-dose groups, respectively.   Among male mice, the first carcinomas were
0039H                               -21-                             03/17/89

-------
found at  48 and  26  weeks  In  the low-  and  high-dose groups,  respectively.
Few hepatocellular tumors were seen  1n  vehicle-treated mice.   The  Incidences
of hepatocellular carcinomas are  presented 1n Table 4-1.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Few  data  concerning cardnogenlclty  of carbon  tetra-
chlorlde from  Inhalation  exposure were located In  the available  literature.
Costa et  al.  (1963)  exposed albino  rats to  unspecified concentrations  of
atmospheric  carbon  tetrachlorlde  for  up to  7  months.   Rats  were  killed
serially from  2-10 months after  the  beginning of exposure.   Of the  30  rats
that survived to termination, 12  had  adenodrrhosls and 10  had liver  nodules
measuring  up  to  1  cm, which  were microscopically diagnosed  as  Incipient  or
established hepatocellular carcinomas.   Established carcinomas were  found  1n
five Hvers and Incipient carcinomas  were found In five others.
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Few  pertinent  data regarding the  mutagenlclty  of carbon  tetrachlorlde
were  located  In  the  available  literature.  Kraemer  et  al.   (1974) found  no
mutagenlclty  In   either   the Salmonella   typh1mur1um  or   Escherlchla  coll
reversion  tests.   Details of the experimental protocol  were  not  available.
IARC  (1979)  also reported a  lack of mutagenlclty  In  S.  typhlmurlum  strains
TA100, TA1535, TA1538 (McCann and Ames,  1976; McCann et al.,  1975;  Uehleke
et  al.,  1976; Uehleke et  al.,   1977)  and  E_.  coll  (Uehleke  et al.,  1976,
1977).  Studies  In which  the  mutagenlclty of carbon tetrachlorlde  was tested
under conditions  that controlled  for volatility  of  the  compound were  also
negative.   Simmon et al.  (1977) used  a desiccator  to expose  plates  of
bacteria to  carbon  tetrachlorlde vapor,  and observed  no  mutagenlc  activity.
Barber et  al.  (1981)  tested  carbon  tetrachlorlde for mutagenlc activity  In
Salmonella  strains  TA1535,  TA1537,   TA1538,  TA98 and  TA100 using  both  a
standard  assay  system  (In  which volatilization  was  not  prevented) and  a
closed  Incubation  system  that   prevented the  escape  of volatilized carbon

0039H                               -22-                             03/17/89

-------
                                  TABLE 4-1

           Incidence of Liver Tumors 1n Mice Treated by Gavage with
          Carbon TetrachloMde 1n Corn Oil  5 Days/Week for  78 Weeks*
                        Dose                  Carcinomas
                   Hales

                   Control
                     Matched                  2/19 (11%)
                     Pooled                   5/77 (6%)

                   1250 mg/kg/day            49/49 (100%)
                   2500 mg/kg/day            47/48 (98%)
                   Females

                   Control
                     Matched                  1/20 (5%)
                     Pooled                   1/80 (1%)

                   1250 mg/kg/day            40/40 (100%)
                   2500 mg/kg/day            43/45 (96%)
*Source: NCI, 1976

NR = Not reported
0039H                 .              -23-                             03/17/89

-------
tetrachlorlde.   Carbon  tetrachloMde  was  not  mutagenlc   In   either   the
standard or closed Incubation system.
    Assays using S.  typhlmurlum  and E_.  coll to assess  the mutagenlclty  of  a
compound  often  use  an  exogenous mammalian  liver S-9  activation system  to
metabolize  the  compound  to  Us  active  form.    The  yeast  Saccharomyces
cerevlslae strain 07 contains an  endogenous  cytochrome  p-450  dependent mono-
oxygenase  activation system, and  Callen et  al.  (1980)  used this yeast  to
demonstrate  that  carbon tetrachlorlde was  mutagenlc  and caused  gene  cross-
over and  mltotlc recombination.  Callen et  al.  (1980)  suggested  that  because
of  the  presence of  an  endogenous  activation system  this  yeast  system was
more sensitive than some of the other 1_n vitro test systems.
    Dean  and Hodson-Walker  (1979)  found that  carbon  tetrachlorlde did not
Induce  chromosome   damage   In   cultured  rat   liver   cells.    M1rsal1s   and
Butterworth  (1980)  reported that  there  was no  UDS In  hepatocytes  Isolated
from rats  following  oral exposure  to carbon tetrachlorlde (10 or 100 mg/kg).
Craddock  and Henderson  (1978)  also  reported  that  carbon tetrachlorlde did
not cause DNA repair (UDS)  1n  hepatocytes  Isolated from animals  exposed  to
4000  mg/kg.   In  their  most  recent study,  M1rsal1s  et  al.   (1982)  reported
that  combinations  of   carbon  tetrachlorlde  doses  (up  to   400  mg/kg)  and
exposure  times  (up to 48  hours)  which   resulted  1n  liver toxldty  were
negative  with respect to UDS.
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    There  1s sufficient evidence   1n mice,  rats and  hamsters  to designate
carbon  tetrachlorlde as a hepatic  carcinogen  In animals.   Brief exposures
have  led  to  flbroblastlc proliferation  and  hlstopathologlcal  liver abnormal-
ities (Prendergast  et al.,  1967),  while  prolonged exposure  (NCI, 1976; We1s-
burger, 1977) results 1n a very high  Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

0039H                                -24-                             08/09/89

-------
    The few case  reports  associated  with  carbon  tetrachlorlde  provide  Inade-
quate  evidence to  confirm  human  carclnogenldty.   Only  one  epldemlologlc
study  (Blair et al.,  1979) was found 1n  the  available  literature.   Blair  et
al.  (1979)  observed  87 cancer deaths 1n  a  cohort of 330 exposed workers  In
which  67.9  cancer deaths  would have  been expected.   Concurrent exposure  to
other  chemicals  precluded ascribing  the observed  Increase  In cancer  Inci-
dence  to carbon tetrachlorlde alone.  On  the  basis of the  guidelines adopted
by  the U.S. EPA  (1986a)  for evaluating  the  overall  weight  of evidence  for
carclnogenldty to humans, carbon  tetrachlorlde  Is classified as a  Group  B2
—  Probable Human Carcinogen.   This  Is  consistent with  the  earlier  analysis
by U.S. EPA (1986b).
0039H                               -25-                             05/04/89

-------
                    .5.  REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

    ACGIH  (1986a,b)  and  U.S. EPA  (1980a)  have established regulatory  stan-
dards for carbon tetrachloMde (Table 5-1).
    IRIS  (U.S.  EPA,  1986b)  lists  a  verified  RfDQ of  7x10"* mg/kg/day  for
carbon tetrachlorlde based on a  NOAEL of 1 mg/kg/day 1n a  subchronlc  gavage
study  1n  rats  by  Bruckner  et  al.   (1986).   The  IRIS report  reflects an
analysis by the U.S.  EPA (1985b)  Office of  Drinking Water.
0039H                               -26-                             03/17/89

-------
                                  TABLE 5-1
      Current Regulatory Standards and Criteria for Carbon Tetrachlorlde
     Criterion
     Value
   Reference
TLV
NIOSH celling level
to prevent cancer
Japan and most
European nations
Most eastern
European nations
Maximum contaminant
level 1n drinking
water
5 ppm (30 mg/m3)
2 ppm (12.6 mg/m3)
10 ppm
3-7.5 ppm
0.005 mg/l
ACGIH, 1986a,b
ACGIH, 1986b

ACGIH, 1986b

ACGIH, 1986b

U.S. EPA, 1987
Ambient water
criteria associated
with cancer risk:
10'7
10'«
10"5
consumption of
6.5 q fish only

0.69 yg/1
6.94 yg/l
69.4 wg/l
2 l water +
6.5 q fish

0.04 yg/l
0.40 jig/l
4.0 yg/l
U.S. EPA, 1980b



0039H
    -27-
       03/17/89

-------
                              6.  RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfD$)
    Bruckner et al. (1986) dosed groups  of  -15  male Sprague-Dawley rats with
carbon  tetrachloride   1n   corn  oil  by   gavage  (1,  10  or  33  mg/kg/day,  5
days/week for  12  weeks).   Liver lesions, as evidenced by  mild  centrllobular
vacuollzatlon  and  statistically   significant   Increases   In  serum  sorbltol
dehydrogenase  activity, were  observed at the  10  and 33 mg/kg/day doses.   A
NOAEL  of  1  mg/kg/day was   observed  In  this  study.   An  RfOg  of  7xlO~3
mg/kg/day  can be  derived based  on  a   NOAEL  of  1  mg/kg/day,  a  conversion
factor of  5/7 (to adjust  for 5 days/week dosing  regimen)  and  an uncertainty
factor of 100  (to allow for Interspecles and Intrahuman variability).
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE  (RfD)
    An oral  RfD of 7xlO~4 mg/kg/day can be calculated  based  on  a  NOAEL  of
1  mg/kg/day  1n  a subchronlc gavage study  by  Bruckner et  al.  (1986).   In
addition to  the  conversion factor  of 5/7 and an uncertainty factor of 100 as
discussed  1n Section  6.1., another  uncertainty factor of 10 was  applied to
adjust  for  extrapolation  from  subchronlc  to  chronic duration  of exposure.
This RfD value was verified by  the U.S.   EPA RfD Workgroup on 12/04/86.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q.,*)
6.3.1.   Oral.   Carbon tetrachloride Is classified  as  a  Group  82,  probable
human  carcinogen,  based on  sufficient   animal  weight   of   evidence  and
Inadequate  human weight  of   evidence.   The Carcinogen Assessment  Group,  as
described  1n U.S. EPA (1984a),  used  data  from  the  Delia Porta  et al.  (1961)
(hamster),  Edwards  et  al. (1942)  (mouse) and NCI  (1976) (both rat and mouse)
studies  for  risk assessment  purposes.   Since the  studies used were deficient
1n  some  respect for quantitative  purposes,  precluding  the choice of any one
study  as most appropriate,  the geometric  mean of  the  upper limit unit risk

0039H                                -28-                            08/01/89

-------
estimates (3.7x10 «)  from  four data sets  has  been calculated  for  unit  risk
corresponding  to   drinking  water  containing   1  vg/i.    Assuming   human
consumption of 2  I  of water/day and a  human body weight  of 70 kg, a  slope
factor  of  I.SOxlO'1  (mg/kg/day)"1  can be  calculated  from  the  unit  risk
of  3.7xlO~«  (yg/l)'1  for  the  oral   route.    U.S.   EPA  (1984a)   contains
an  1n-depth  explanation  of   the   rationale  applied  and  the  calculations
employed.  This value has  been verified and 1s  available  on  IRIS  (U.S.  EPA,
1987).
6.3.2.   Inhalation.  U.S.  EPA  (1987)   adopted   the  oral  slope  factor  of
l.SxlO'1  (mg/kg/day)"1  and  an  Inhalation  absorption factor  of 0.4,  based
on pharmacoklnetlc  data  evaluated by U.S.  EPA (1984a),  to  estimate a  slope
factor  for  Inhalation exposure.   Applying  the  Inhalation  absorption  factor
of 0.4  to  the  oral  slope  factor  of  l.SxlO"1  (mg/kg/day)'1  results   In  an
Inhalation slope factor  of 5.2xlO~2 (mg/kg/day)'1.
0039H                               -29-                             08/01/89

-------
                                7.   REFERENCES

Abbott, G.A.  and M.J. Miller.   1948.   Carbon  tetrachlorlde  poisoning — A
report on  ten cases  at  the U.S. Marine Hospital,  Seattle,  WA, since 1937.
Pub. Health Rep.   63: 1619-1624.  (Cited 1n NIOSH,  1975)

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).   1986a.
Threshold  Limit   Values   and  Biological   Exposure  Indices   for   1986-1987.
Cincinnati, OH.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Documentation of the  Threshold  Limit Values and  Biological Exposure  Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

Adams,  E.M.,   H.C.  Spencer,  V.K.   Rowe,  D.O.   McColHster  and  D.D.  Irish.
1952.  Vapor  toxldty of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  determined by experiments  on
laboratory animals.   Arch.  Ind.  Hyg.  Occup.  Med.  6: 50-66.  (Cited  In  U.S.
EPA, 1980a, 1983a)

Alumot, E.,  E. Nachtoml,  E.  Mandel and P.  Holsteln.   1976.  Tolerance  and
acceptable  dally Intake  of  chlorinated  fumlgants  In  the  rat  diet.   Food
Cosmet. Toxlcol.   14: 105-110.

Banerjee,  S.,  S.H.  Yalkowsky  and S.C.  Valvanl.   1980.  Mater solubility  and
octanol/water  partition   coefficients  of  organlcs.   Limitations   of   the
solubility-partition  coefficient  correlation.    Environ.  Sd.  Technol.   14:
1227-1229.
0039H                               -30-                             03/17/89

-------
Barber,  E.D.,  W.H.  Donlsh  and  K.R.  Mueller.   1981.   A  procedure  for  the
quantitative measurement of the mutagenldty of volatile liquids  In  the  Ames
Salmonella/mlcrosome assay.   Mutat.  Res.   90:  31-28.   (Cited  In U.S.  EPA,
19855).

Barnes,  R.  and  R.C.  Jones.   1967.    Carbon  tetrachlorlde  poisoning.   Am.
Ind. Hyg. Assoc. 0.  28: 557-560.   (CHed 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

Blair, A.,-P. Decoufle  and  D.  Grauman.   1979.   Causes  of death  among laundry
and  dry  cleaning  workers.   Am.  J.  Publ.  Health.  69:  508-511.   (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1984a)

Bruckner, J.V., W.F. MacKenzle,  S.  Muralldhara, R. Luthra, G.M.  Kyle  and  0.
Acosta.   1986.   Oral  toxlclty of  carbon tetrachlorlde:  Acute,  subacute  and
subchronlc studies 1n rats.   Fund.  Appl.  Toxlcol.   6(1):  16-34.

Callahan,  M.A.,  M.W.   Sllmak,  N.W.  Gabel,  et  al.    1979.    Water-Related
Environmental Fate of 129 Priority Pollutants,  Vol. II.  U.S. EPA, Office  of
Mater  Planning  and Standards, Office  of Water and Waste  Management, Wash-
ington, DC.   EPA-440/4-79-029b.

Callen, D.F., C.R. Wolfe and  R.M. PhUpot.   1980.  Cytochrome P-450  mediated
genetic  activity   and   cytotoxlclty  of  seven   halogenated  aliphatic  hydro-
carbons  1n  Saccharomyces  cerevlslae.   Mutation Res.   77:  55-63.   (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1985a)
0039H                               -31-                            03/17/89

-------
Condle,  L.W.,  R.D.  Laurie,  T.  Mills,  M.  Robinson  and  J.P.  Bercz.   1986.
Effect of  gavage  vehicle on hepatotoxldty  of  carbon  tetrachlo.Mde in  CD-I
mice: Corn  oil  vs. Tween 60 aqueous  emulsion.   Fund.  Appl. Toxlcol.   7(2):
199-206.

Cornish,   H.H.  and J.  Adefuln.  1966.   Ethanol  potentlatlon of  halogenated
aliphatic solvent  toxlclty.  Am.  Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.  J.  27:  57-61.   (Cited  In
U.S. EPA-, 1985b)

Costa, A.,  G.  Weber, F.S.O. Bartolonl  and  G. Campana.   1963.   Experimental
cancerous cirrhosis  from carbon  tetrachlorlde 1n rats.   Arch.  DeVecchl.   39:
303-356.   (Hal.)  (Cited 1n NIOSH, 1975)

Craddock, V.M. and A.R. Henderson.  1978.   De novo and  repair  replication of
DNA  In  liver  of  carcinogen-treated  animals.  Cancer  Res.  38:  2135-2143.
(Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985b)

Dean, B.J.  and  G.  Hodson-Walker.  1979.  An  Vn vitro  chromosome assay  using
cultured  rat-liver  cells.   Mutat.  Res.   64: 329-337.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,
1985a)

Delia  Porta,  G.,  B.  Terraclnl and  P.  Shublk.  1961.   Induction  with  carbon
tetrachlorlde of  liver  cell carcinomas  1n  hamsters.   3. Natl.  Cancer  Inst.
26: 855-863.  (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1984a)

Edwards,  J.  1941.   Hepatomas  In mice  Induced with carbon tetrachlorlde.  J.
Natl. Cancer Inst.   2: 197-199.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

0039H                               -32-                             03/17/89

-------
Edwards, J.  and  A.  Dalton.  1942.   Induction  of  cirrhosis  of the liver and
hepatomas  1n mice  with  carbon  tetrachlorlde.   3.  Natl.  Cancer  Inst.  3:
19-41.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Edwards, J.,  W.E.  Heston  and  A.J.  Dalton.  1942.   Induction of the carbon
tetrachlorlde  hepatoma  1n  strain   L  mice.    J.   Natl.  Cancer  Inst.   3:
297-301.  (Cited In  U.S.  EPA, 1980a)

Eschenbrenner, A.B.  and  E.  Miller.   1944.   Studies on  hepatomas.   I.   Size
and  spacing  of  multiple  doses   In  the  Induction  of  carbon tetrachlorlde
hepatomas.   J. Natl. Cancer Inst.  4:  385-388.   (Cited  In U.S.  EPA, 1983b)

Eschenbrenner, A.B.  and  E.  Miller.   1946.   Liver  necrosis  and the Induction
of carbon  tetrachlorlde  hepatomas 1n strain A  mice.   J.  Natl. Cancer  Inst.
6: 325-341.  (CHed  1n U.S. EPA,  1980a)

Gray,  I.   1947.  Carbon  tetrachlorlde  poisoning  —  Report  of  seven  cases
with two deaths.  NY State J. Med.  47:  2311-2315.   (Cited In  NIOSH,  1975)

Guild,  W.R., J.V.  Young  and  J.P.  Merrill.   1958.   Anurla   due  to carbon
tetrachlorlde  Intoxication.   Ann.  Int.  Med.   48:  1221-1227.    (CHed In
NIOSH, 1975)

Hafeman,  D.G.   and  W.G.   Hoekstra.    1977.    Protection   against  carbon
tetrachloMde-lnduced  llpld  peroxldatlon  In  the  rat by dietary  vitamin E,
selenium and methlonlne  as  measured  by  ethane  evolution.    J.  Nutr.    107:
656-665.  (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA, 1980a)
0039H                               -33-                             03/17/89

-------
Hansch,  C  and  A.J.  Leo.   1985.   Medchem  Project  Issue  No.  26.    Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hayes,  J.R.,  L.W. Condle,  Or.  and  J.F.  Borzelleca.   1986.   Acute,  14-day
repeated  dosing  and  90-day  subchronlc  toxldty  studies of  carbon  tetra-
chlorlde 1n CD-I mice.  Fund. Appl.  Toxlcol.   7(3):  454-463.

HS08  (Hazardous  Substances  Data  Base).   1988.  Computer  Printout  for  Carbon
Tetrachlorlde.  National  Library of  Medicine,  National  Toxicology  Informa-
tion Program, Bethesda, MD.   August, 1988.

IARC  (International  Agency   for  Research  on  Cancer).   1979.   Carbon  Tetra-
chlorlde.   In;  Some Halogenated Hydrocarbons.   IARC  Monographs on  the  Evalu-
ation  of  the Carcinogenic Risk of  Chemicals  to Humans.  WHO, Lyon,  France.
20: 371-399.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1983a)

Kraemer, M.,  D.  Blmboes  and H.  Grelm.  1974.   S. typhlmurlum and  E_. coll  to
detect  chemical  mutagens.    Naunyn-Schmled.    Arch.  Pharmacol.   284:  46R.
(Abstr.)  (Cited  In U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Lamson, P.D., G.H. Gardner,  R.K. Gustaeson, E.D. Malre,  A.J.  McLean  and H.S.
Wells.   1923.   No title  provided.   J.  Pharmacol.  Exp.  Ther.  22:  215-288.
(Cited 1n von Oettlngen, 1964; U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

Lehmann, K.B. and H.  Hasegawa.   1910.  Studies of  the  Absorption  of  Chlori-
nated  Hydrocarbons  In  Animals  and  Humans.    Archlv.   Fuer.  Hygiene.   In:
National  Research   Council,  1978.   Nonfluorlnated   Halomethanes   In  the
Environment.  NAS, Washington, DC.   72:  327-342.  (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

0039H                               -34-                             03/17/89

-------
Lehmann,  K.B.   and  L.  Schmidt-Ken!.    1936.   The  thirteen  most  Important
chlorinated  aliphatic  hydrocarbons   from  the  standpoint  of   Industrial
hygiene. Arch.  Hyg.   116:  132-200.

Marchand, C, S.  McLean  and  G.L.  Plaa.  1970.   The effect of SKF  525A on  the
distribution of carbon  tetrachlorlde  In  rats.   J.  Pharmacol.  Exp.  Ther.
174: 232-238.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1985b)

McCann,  J.  and  B.N.  Ames.   1976.  Detection  of  carcinogens  as  mutagens  In
the  Salmonella/mlcrosome  test: Assay  of   300  chemicals:  Discussion.   Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sd.  73:  950-954.  (Cited 1n  IARC, 1979)

McCann, J., E.   Choi,  E. Yamasakl  and  B.N.  Ames.   1975.   Detection of  carcin-
ogens as mutagens 1n  the  Salmonella/mlcrosome test:  Assay of 300 chemicals.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sd.  72:  5135-5139.  (Cited In  IARC,  1979)

McColHster, D.D., W.H. Beamer,  G.J.  Atchlson and H.C.  Spencer.   1951.   The
absorption, distribution and  elimination of radioactive  carbon  tetrachlorlde
by  monkeys  upon exposure  to  low  vapor concentration.    3.  Pharmacol.   Exp.
Ther.  102: 112-124.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1984a)

McGuIre, L.W.   1932.    Carbon  tetrachlorlde  poisoning.    3.  Am.  Med. Assoc.
99: 988-989.  (Cited 1n NIOSH, 1975)

M1rsal1s,  J.C.  and  B.E.  Butterworth.  1980.   Detection  of unscheduled  DNA
synthesis  In hepatocytes  Isoluted  from rats  treated  with genotoxlc  agents:
An In vlvo-ln  vitro assay  for potential carcinogens  and  mutagens.   Carclno-
genesls.  1: 621-625.   (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA,  1985a)

0039H                               -35-                             03/17/89

-------
M1rsal1s,  J.C.,   C.K.  Tyson  and  B.E.  Butterworth.   1982.    Detection  of
genotoxlc carcinogens  1n  the  In v1vo-1n vitro  hepatocyte DNA repair assay.
Environ. Mutagen.  4: 553-562.   (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  19853)

Moeller, W.   1973.   Chronic  carbon tetrachlorlde poisoning from an  ophthal-
mologlcal viewpoint.   Z.  Ges.  Hyg.   19: 127-133.   (Ger.)  (CHed 1n NIOSH,
1975; U.S. EPA, 1983a)

NCI  (National  Cancer Institute).  1976.   Report on-Carclnogenesls  Bloassay
of Chloroform.   Carclnogenesls Program,  Division of  Cancer Cause and Preven-
tion, Bethesda, MD.  (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1984a)

Neeley,  W.B.,  O.R.  Branson and  G.E.  Blau.   1974.   Partition coefficient to
measure  bloconcentratlon  potential of  organic  chemicals  In  fish.   Environ.
Sc1. Techno!.  8: 1113.

Nielsen,  V.K. and  J.  Larsen.   1965.   Acute  renal  failure due  to carbon
tetrachlorlde  poisoning.   Acta Medlca.   178:  363-374.   (Scandinavia) (Cited
1n U.S.  EPA, 1980a)

NIOSH   (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety  and   Health).   1975.
Criteria  for  a Recommended Standard...Occupational  Exposure  to  Carbon Tetra-
chlorlde.  U.S.  DHEW, PHS, CDC, Rockvllle,  MD.

Page,  G.W.   1981.   Comparison  of groundwater and surface water  for  patterns
and  levels   of contamination  by toxic  substances.   Environ. Scl.  Technol.
15:  1475-1481.
0039H                               -36-                             03/17/89

-------
Prendergast, J.A.,  R.A.  Jones, L.J. Jenkins  and  J.  Slegel.  1967.   Effects
on experimental animals of  long-term Inhalation of trlchloroethylene,  carbon
tetrachlorlde,   1,1,1-tMchloroethane,   dlchlorodlfluoromethane   and  I,l-d1-
chloroethylene.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   10:  270-289.   (Cited In  U.S.
EPA, 1983b)

Rabes,  U.   1972.    Results  of occupational  medical  examinations of  workers
exposed for many  years  to  carbon tetrachlorlde.   W1ss. Z.  Univ.  Halle.   21:
73-80.  (Cited In  U.S. EPA,  1983a)

Reddrop  C.J.,  VI.  R1ess and  T.F.  Slater.   1981.   Interactions  of  carbon
tetrachlorlde and promethazlne 1n the rat.   II. Elimination of  carbon  tetra-
chlorlde and chloroform In expired  air as  Indications  of  their  metabolism In
the Intact animal.  Blochem.  Pharmacol.  30:  1449-1455.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,
1985b)

Robblns, B.H.   1929.   The absorption, distribution  and excretion  of  carbon
tetrachlorlde  1n dogs under  various conditions.   J.  Pharmacol.   37: 203-216.
(Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1980a)

Sabljlc, A.  1984.  Predictions  of  the  nature and strength  of  soil sorptlon
of  organic  pollutants  by  molecular  topology.    J.  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   32:
243-246.

Schwetz, B.A., B.K.J. Leong  and  P.J.  Gehrlng.  1974.   Embryo and  fetotoxlc-
1ty  of  Inhaled  carbon  tetrachlorlde,  1 ,l-d1chloroethane  and  methyl  ethyl
ketone  In  rats.   Toxlcol.  Appl.   Pharmacol.   28:  452-464.   (Cited  In  NIOSH,
1975)

0039H                               -37-                              03/17/89

-------
Seawrlght, A.A.  and  A.E.M.  McLean.   1967.   The effect  of diet  on carbon
tetrachlorlde metabolism.  Blochem. J.  105: 1055-1060.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,
1985b)

Slmler, M.,  M.  Mauer and J.C. Mandard.   1964.   Liver cancer with cirrhosis
due to  carbon  tetrachlorlde.   Strasbourg  Med.   15:  910-918.  (Fre.)   (CHed
1n IARC, 1979;  U.S.  EPA,  1983b)

Simmon, V.F., K. Kauhanen and  R.G. Tardlff.  1977.  Mutagenldty activity of
chemicals Identified  In drinking water.  In: Progress  1n Genetic Toxicology,
D.  Scott,  B.A.  Bridges  and  F.H.  Sobals,  Ed.   Elsevler/North-Holland Bio-
medical Press,  New York.   p.  249-258.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1985a)

Smetana, H.  1939.   Nephrosls  due  to  carbon tetrachlorlde.  Arch. Int. Med.
63: 760-777.   (Cited 1n NIOSH,  1975)

Smlllle, W.G.  and S.B.  Pessoa.   1923.  Treatment of  hookworm disease with
carbon tetrachlorlde.  Am. J.  Hyg.   3: 35-45.   (Cited  In  NIOSH,  1975)

Smyth, H.F.  and  H.F.  Smyth,  Jr.   1935.  Investigation of  the Chronic  Toxlc-
1ty  of Carbon  Tetrachlorlde   —  Final Report  to the Producers  Committee.
(Cited In NIOSH, 1975; U.S.  EPA,  1983a)

Smyth, H.F., H.F. Smyth,  Jr.  and C.P. Carpenter.  1936.   The chronic  toxlc-
1ty of  carbon  tetrachlorlde  — Animal exposures  and  field  studies.  J. Ind.
Hyg. Toxlcol.  18: 277-298.   (Cited In NIOSH,  1975; U.S.  EPA,  1984a)
0039H                               -38-                             03/17/89

-------
Tracey,  J.P.   and  P.  Sherlock.   1968.    Hepatoma  following  carbon  tetra-
chlorlde poisoning.  NYS J. Med.  68:  2202-2204.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1983b)

Tralger,  G.J.  and  G.L.  Plaa.   1971.  Differences  In  the  potentlatlon  of
carbon  tetrachlorlde  In  rats  by  ethanol   and   Isopropanol   pretreatment.
Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  20: 105-112.   (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

Uehleke, H., H.  Grelm,  M.  Kramer and T. Werner.  1976.  Covalent binding  of
haloalkanes to  Hver  constHutents,  but  absence of mutagenldty on  bacteria
1n  a  metabolizing  test  system  (Abstract  No.  25).   Mutat.  Res.   38:  114.
(Cited 1n IARC, 1979)

Uehleke, H., T. Werner,  H. Grelm and  M. Kramer.   1977.   Metabolic activation
of  haloalkanes  and   tests  in  vitro  for  mutagenldty.   Xenob1ot1ca.    7:
393-400.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA, 1985a)

U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Carbon  Tetrachlorlde.
Prepared by the Office of  Health and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH for the Office  of Water Regu-
lations and Standards, Washington,  DC.  EPA 440/5-80-026.  NTIS PB 81-117376.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.   Guidelines  and Methodology Used  In the Preparation  of
Health  Effects Assessment  Chapters  of   the   Consent  Decree  Water   Quality
Criteria Documents.  Federal  Register. 45(231): 79347-79357.
0039H                               -39-                             03/17/89

-------
U.S. EPA.   1983a.    Reportable Quantity  Document for Carbon  TetrachloMde.
Prepared by the Office of Health  and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for  the  Office of  Emergency
and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1983b.   Review of Tox1colog1c  Data  1n Support of  Evaluation  for
Carcinogenic  Potential  of Carbon TetrachloMde.  Prepared  by the  Office  of
Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Carcinogen  Assessment  Group,   Wash-
ington, DC for the Office of Solid  Waste  and  Emergency Response,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1984a.    Health  Assessment  Document for  Carbon  TetrachloMde.
Office  of  Health and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH.  EPA 600/8-82-001F.  NTIS PB 85-124196.

U.S. EPA.  1984b.  Methodology and  Guidelines for Ranking Chemicals Based  on
Chronic Toxlclty  Data.   Prepared by  the  Office  of  Health  and  Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Criteria  and  Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH  for
the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.   EPA.    1985a.    Assessment  of   the  Mutagenlc  Potential   of  Carbon
Dlsulflde,  Carbon TetrachloMde,  Dlchloromethane,   Ethylene DIchloMde  and
Methyl  Bromide:  A Comparative  Analysis  1n  Relation to Ethylene  Dlbromlde.
Office  of  Health and Environmental Assessment,  Reproductive Effects Assess-
ment Group, Washington, DC.  EPA/600/6-85/001.  NTIS PB85-241800/AS.
0039H                               -40-                             03/28/89

-------
U.S. EPA.  1985b.   Drinking Water  Criteria  Document  for  Carbon Tetrachlorlde
(Final Draft).  Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC.  NTIS PB86-118155.

U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Guidelines   for   Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(1985): 33992-34003.

U.S. EPA.  1986b.   Integrated  Risk  Information  System (IRIS).   Risk estimate
for   carcinogens:   Carbon  Tetrachlorlde.    Online.    (Verification   date:
12/04/86).   Office  of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S.  EPA.   1987.    Part  II.  National  Primary  Drinking Water  Regulations  —
Synthetic Organic  Chemicals;  Monitoring for Unregulated  Contaminants;  Final
Rule.  Federal Register.  52:  25690-25717.

Velth, G.D.,  D.L.  Derfoe  and  B.V. Bergstedt.   1979.  Measuring  and estimat-
ing  the  bloconcentratlon  factor  of chemicals  1n  fish.   J.  F1sh  Res.  Board.
36: 1040-1048.

von  Oettlngen,  W.F.  1964.  The  halogenated hydrocarbons of  Industrial  and
toxlcologlcal  Importance.   In.:   Elsevler   Monographs  on Toxic  Agents,  E.
Browning, Ed.  Elsevler Publishing Co., NY.   (Cited In U.S. EPA,  1980a)

von  Oettlngen,  W.F., C.C.  Powell, N.E.  Sharpless  et  al.  1949.   Relation
between  the  toxic  action of  chlorinated   methanes  and  their chemical  and
physlochemlcal properties.  Natl. Inst.  Health  Bull.   No. 191.  In: National
Research  Council.   1978.   Non-fluorlnated  Halomethanes   In  the  Environment.
NAS, Washington, DC.  p. 1-85.   (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

0039H                               -41-                             03/17/89

-------
von Oettlngen, W.F., C.C. Powell, N.E. Sharplesss et al.  1950.   Comparative
studies of  the toxldty and  pharmacodynamlc  action  of chlorinated methanes
with  special  reference to   their  physical  and  chemical   characteristics.
Arch.  Int.  de  Pharmacodynamle  et  de   Theraple.   In:  National  Research
Council.   1978.    Non-fluor1nated   Halomethanes  In  the  Environment.   NAS,
Washington, DC.  81: 17-34.   (Cited  In U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

Wei, E., et al.  1971.   Potentlatlon  of carbon tetrachloMde  hepatox1c1ty by
ethanol and  cold.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.  18:  329-334.   (Cited In U.S.
EPA, 1980a)

Welsburger,  E.K.   1977.   Cardnogenldty   studies  on  halogenated   hydro-
carbons.  Environ.  Health Perspect.   21:  7-16.  (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1984a)

Wilson,  J.T.   1954.    Influence  of  the offspring  of  altered  physiologic
states during pregnancy 1n  the rat.   Ann.  NY Acad.  Sc1.   57:  517-525.

Wilson, J.T.  and B.H.  Wilson.   1985.   B1otransformat1on of  trlchloroethylene
1n soil.  Appl. Env. Mlcroblol.  49: 242-243.

Wilson, J.T.,  J.F.  McNabb, B.H. Wilson and  M.J.  Noonan.   1983.   Blotransfor-
matlon  of  selected organic  pollutants In groundwater.   Dev.  Ind.  Mlcroblol.
24: 225-233.

Zoeteman,  B.C.3.,   K.  Harmensen,   J.B.H.3.   Llnders,  C.F.H.  Morra  and  W.
Slooff.  1980.   Persistent organic  pollutants  In river  water  and groundwater
of The Netherlands.  Chemosphere.  9: 231-249.

0039H                               -42-                             03/17/89

-------