United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office ol
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R06-89/049
December 1988
&EPA Superfund
Record of Decision:
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
-------
50272-101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
1. REPORT NO.
EPA/ROD/R06-89/049
3* Rcciptont'c Aco*'*lon No.
4. Title and Subtitle
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
'First Remedial Action
7. AuthorU)
S. Report D«t«
12/29/88
a. Performing Organization Rept No.
8. Pwlemilng Crgemlzrion Nun* end Address
10. Protect/Tsek/Work Unit Ho.
11. Contr«ct
-------
EPA/ROD/R06-89/049
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
First Remedial Action
16. Abstract (Continued)
oil with stabilization and onsite disposal of residuals in the pond. If PCB
concentrations in the residuals are less than 50 mg/kg, they will be placed under a
RCRA-compliant cap. Residuals with PCB concentrations greater than 50 mg/kg PCB will be
placed in a RCRA-compliant landfill in the pond area. In addition, the remediation
requires capping the entire pond and dike area; decontamination and offsite disposal of
tanks, drums, and debris; treatment to best available technology (BAT) of any
contaminated wastewater and stormwater with discharge to the river; implementation of
engineering controls to prevent bank erosion on the river; and ground water monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for this remedial action is $27,956,000, which includes
total O&M costs of $863,000.
-------
RECORD OF DECISION
FOR
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICES SITE
WALLER COUNTY, TEXAS
(SOURCE CONTROL OPERABLE UNIT)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DECEMBER 1988
-------
3 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
_ ' REGION VI
! ""0l*W 1445 ROSS AVENUE SUITE 1200
DALLAS. TEXAS 75202
DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Sheridan Disposal Services site, Waller County, Texas
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
This decision document outlines the selected remedial action for the Sheridan
Disposal Services site in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriration Act of 1986 (SARA), and to the
extent practicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution
Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part 300, November 20, 1985.
This decision document describes the remedial action for the Source Control
Operable unit. This first operable unit reduces the risks associated with
exposure to contaminated materials and addresses the sources of contamination
to ground water by treating onsite wastes and soils. The second operable
unit will address ground water.
The State of Texas (through the Texas Water Commission) has been provided
an opportunity to comment on the technology and degree of treatment proposed
by the Record of Decision. The letter describing the State's concurrence
with the selected remedy is found in Appendix D.
STATEMENT OF BASIS
This decision is based on the administrative record for the Sheridan site.
The index found in Appendix B identifies the items which comprise this
administrative record.
DESCRIPTION OF THE REMEDY
Upon review of the information contained in the administrative record, it
is EPA's judgment that onsite biotreatment of wastes appears to best serve
both statutory and selection criteria in relation to the other solutions
evaluated. A detailed description of this remedy and an explanation of how
it meets statutory requirements is contained in the attached "Summary of
Remedial Alternative Selection."
-------
icquiring remediation by Biotreatment shall be defined by the
following:
1. All material containing greater than 25 ppm of PCBs. This material
includes the sludges contained in the pond and evaporation system;
2. Floating oil and emulsion in the pond and in onsite storage tanks;
3. Affected soil under pond - Affected soil under the pond is defined as
I soil that is intermixed with sludge or contains greater than 25 ppm of
•• PCBs. The extent of affected soil under the pond will be determined
during the remedial design/remedial action.
! 4. Dike surface soils - This material shall include: 1) oily soil on the
inside dike slope between the current sludge level to the highest level
the floating oil layer has contacted; 2) Grossly contaminated soil and
< sludge deposits visible on the dike. At a minimum, this shall include
the soil and sludge in the vicinity of the treatment tanks and incine-
rator in the north-northeastern portions of the dike.
5. The wastes described in items 1-4 above address all wastes containing
over 25 ppm of PCBs and/or high concentrations of other organics such as
benzene and phenol.
If Biotreatment can reduce the level of PCBs in the residuals to less
than 50 ppm, the residuals will be stabilized, returned to the pond and
capped. If the concentration of PCBs in the biotreated residuals is
greater than 50 ppm, they will be stabilized and returned to a RCRA-com-
pliant landfill in the pond area.
In addition to treating the waste described above by Biotreatment the
remedy shall also include the implementation of the actions described below:
o Install a RCRA-conpliant cap over the entire pond and dike area.
o Install a flexible spur jetty river bank erosion control system in
the Brazos River.
o Monitor ground water quality for a minimum of 30 years.
o Decontaminate, disassemble and properly dispose of all onsite tanks
and processing equipment.
o Properly dispose of any drums encountered during remediation. Con-
tents of intact drums will be treated onsite or disposed of off-
site, depending on the nature of the material.
• o Treat potentially contaminated stormwater and waste-water streams
resulting from the waste treatment alternatives, to remove solids,
metal, and organic constituents. The treated water will comply with
all Federal/State standards for discharge into the Brazos River.
-------
o Implement institutional controls to preclude use of contaminated
ground water and ensure the long-term integrity of the cap.
DECLARATION
The remedy described above is protective of human health and the environment,
attains Federal and State applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
and is cost-effective. This remedy satisfies the statuatory preference for
remedies that employ treatment that reduces toxicity, mobility or volume as
a principal element and utilizes permanent solutions and alternative technol-
ogies to the maximum extent practicable.
Because this remedy may result in hazardous substances remaining onsite above
health-based levels, a review will be conducted within five years after com-
mencement of the remedial action to ensure that the remedy continues to
provide adequate protection of human health and the environment.
Date Robert E. Layton jr., P.E;,
Regional Administrator
-------
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICES SITE
WALLER COUNTY, TEXAS
SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTION
DECEMBER 1988
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY f
1.1 History and Enforcement 1
1.2 Geology 2
1.3 Hydrogeology 2
1.4 Site Investigation Results 3
1.5 Treatablllty Testing 5
1.6 Potential Impacts of the Site on
Human Health and the Environment 6
II ENFORCEMENT 7
III COMMUNITY RELATIONS 7
IV ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION 8
4.1 Evaluation Criteria 8
4.2 Description of Alternatives 11
4.3 Evaluation of Alternatives 12
4.4 Operation and Maintenance 16
V SELECTED REMEDY 16
VI APPENDICES
A. Applicable, or Relevant and Appropriate Requirenents Summary
B. Administrative Record
C. Responsiveness Summary
D. State Response to Record of Decision
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NUMBER TITLE
1 Geologic Description and Water-bearing Properties
of the Geologic Units forming the Aquifers in Waller
and Austin Counties
2a Summary of Organic Compounds detected On-site
2h Summary of Inorganic Compounds detected On-site
3a Results of Priority Pollutant GC/MS Analyses for
for the Source Control RI
3h Results of Priority Pollutant Sampling, October
1987 for Well Screened in the Unconfined Aquifer
4 Cost Summary of Remedial Alternatives
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
TITLE
General Site Location Map
Site Location Map
Site Plot Plan
General Schematic of Site Geology
-------
I. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The Sheridan Disposal Services site is located approximately nine miles north-
northwest of the City of Hempstead in Waller County, Texas. The site covers
about 110 acres in a 700-acre tract of land which 1s bordered by the Brazos
River to the north and Clark Road to the South (See Figures 1 and 2).
Located at the site are a lagoon (12-22 acres depending on water levels), a
17-acre dike surrounding the lagoon, and a 42-acre evaporation/land irrigation
system. An incinerator and a group of nine storage tanks which were used
for waste storage and treatment are located on the lagoon dikes. These
site features are illustrated in Figure 3.
The predominant land-use within a four-mile radius of the site is agriculture
and range land. The only primarily residential area within this four-mile
radius is the community of Brown College. This community is made up of
approximately 20 residences and is located one and one half miles north
of the site. Nearby communities primarily utilize ground water from the
Evangeline aquifer to meet their water supply needs.
The site is relatively flat, but slopes gently to the south. It lies within
the 100-year floodplain of the Brazos River. However, the lagoon dikes have
been built up to an elevation above that of the floodplain.
1.1 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT
Sheridan Disposal Services operated as a commercial waste disposal facility
form about 1958 to 1984. A wide variety of organic and inorganic chemical
and solid wastes were disposed of at the site. The facility treated waste
by stean distillation, open burning and incineration. The lagoon was devel-
oped in a low-lying area of the site and was used as a holding pond, and for
the disposal of overflow wastes and waste treatment residues. In 1976,
the facility initiated use of the evaporation system for disposal of water
which accumulated on the lagoon.
The site's regulatory history began in 1963 when the Texas Water Quality
Board (now known as the Texas Water Commission) issued a permit authorizing
disposal of industrial solid waste. After permitting, the Texas Water
Quality Board (TWQB) received complaints concerning odor, runoff and
oil in the Brazos River. The State also noted increased concentrations of
contarir.^ts in on-site monitoring wells.
In 1970, the TWQB and Waller County filed suit against the Sheridan facility.
After a series of meetings and public hearings, in 1975, a judgement was
entered by the Court which prohibited further discharge of wastes into the
lagoon. The TUQB and Sheridan Disposal Services discussed numerous closure
plans for the lagoon until the TWQB determined that the facility did not
have the economic or technical resources necessary to close the lagoon
properly. In 1984, the Texas Department of Water Resources (successor of
the TWQB) sent letters to generators and transporters of waste managed at
the site to notify them of their potential liability under CERCLA.
-------
COURTNEY
GRIMES
HTwooo
10
SCALE (MILES)
FIGURE I
SITE LOCATION MAP
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
-------
.J t~*^A \
• \\ -,
-------
-------
In response to this notification, the Sheridan Steering Committee, which is
now known as the Sheridan Site Committee, organized and began to investigate
the extent of contamination at the site. After polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) were identified in the lagoon, EPA became directly involved in site
closure through the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The site was ranked
according to the Superfund Hazard Ranking System and on June 10, 1986, the
site was proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List.
In June and July of 1986, 102 Notice/Information request letters were sent to
site Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). During this time, the Sheridan
Site Committee submitted a Remedial Investigation to EPA for evaluation.
After reviewing this document the Agency determined that additional field
investigations would be necessary to obtain adequate information on which to
base a ground water remedy decision. However, in order to expedite lagoon
cleanup and reduce further leaching into ground water, the site was divided
into two operable units, a Source Control unit which is addressed in this ROD
and a Ground Water Migration Management (GWMM) unit which will be addressed
in a later ROD.
On February 3, 1987, 59 companies who were members of the Sheridan Site Com-
mittee entered into an Administrative Order on Consent with EPA to complete
both the Source Control and GWMM RI/FSs. In 1988, EPA issued a unilateral
order to site PRPs to lower the level of water in the lagoon. This
action was implemented by the Committee's contractor with EPA oversight.
1.2 GEOLOGY
The Sheridan site lies on the Brazos River Alluvium of recent age, which is
comprised of gravel, sand, silt and clay deposited by the meandering river.
The Brazos River Alluvium unconformably overlies the Miocene-aged Fleming
formation. The Fleming is made up of interbedded sand and clay layers.
Table 1 provides a general description of the hydrogeologic units present in
Waller and Austin counties. Please note that all formations from the Goliad
sand to the Beaumont clay are not present beneath the site.
According to the Austin sheet of the Geologic Atlas of Texas, no faults with
surface expression occur in the vicinity of the site. Held investigations
conducted by the responsible parties' contractor verified this conclusion.
The Hockley escarpment and Salt Dome are found about 18 miles south of the
site and the Mill lean fault zone lies approximately 20 miles to the north.
However, there is no evidence that these features influence the hydrogeology
of the site.
1.3 HYDROGEOLOGY
The alluvium of the Brazos River forms the first Regional aquifer beneath the
site. The Evangeline and Jasper aquifers underlie the alluvium. Most wells
in the vicinity of the site tap the Evangeline aquifer, which is about 450
feet thick beneath the site.
-------
riftian and wUr-fcaoxing propxrUoa of tbt fMloale Bttlta fotaing tto aqidfora in «0tin and
Atutftr
Allurlal
•Vang
i
•urki
Jqulc
"
till*.
lilt
ludt
r
•trad graphic
wit
tributary allOTlM
and need-plain
•llwit* ef tbt
•!•(• Mvar
Baaacnt Gay
a&nt gentry
fenatien
BtnUty
fWMtien
iflllla Sand
feliad tend
n«»lng
feiMtlen
CBUhoula
•andnont
tMlfforantiatad
ttlekntaa
in ara*
(fttt)
0- •
0- 7$
0- 407
0- SO?
0- 940?
0» (40?
•-1,700
»
-
Auatin and ttallor CBwtlaa
•ognBelldatedaray, team, end
rvddiBVbrojn day, aUt, and
aandy day, oaiujy ortr lying
lifht-oolorod aand or aBaratr-
*alntd a*nd and aravtl.
abttlod rtd, raOUtf^rom, bram
and fr«y. dew dc/ M« vtUU
oUatMi* nedilM. My oanUln
IVMti e< tint and ••* ur-
Bkirvd aind et avd and fravil
in pi MI.
UoM nriy te Jltftt tram. fti»-
frtintd aand, iUt, and clay.
ptetmtJy artding iilOi dtpth te
4hrk*i-eclor*d eairatr aind and
In plcaii taaU aind and aravil.
JUUrtMting far* of n&JaVkram
te ytllew and >ri), aotuad
eliy intctbrdkd «4U> «riyUh,
tint- te CMrM-fraintd atnd
and orwc: l«nai«. CatUrtd
Ivitili cf IIM oaigiud
av^tent. a*j, avidy el»y,
and (int aind prcdorlmu in
tht upftt j»rt, *rktr-«e)etaj
eotratt atnd and aravtl in tM
lo**r pirt.
Alttrmtlng e«A of iDttltd rtd.
ycllev, btexr., and or«y clay
and »«,i3 vith aaittcrtd lanati
inaarttd atnd *nd quirtt aintl.
rtrrugineui nedulM aomai.
•*cktd and hard in f rath aqo-
•urM. auO cart it i»i»Uy
• h»td, atavciiy aind and c)«y.
Nhltt te ar«y, ttitty, e&}e§r*e«B
el»' wltli inurtrddrd lanati of
ll^t-eclond, fravtlly aind
and lli» o»»ani>d aindnon*.
»J»et ehart oralnt in tM
•hitlah aind 0*i • mlt and
•»H«t attaet.
Inttrt»ddrd clay and atndi clay
•radotintntly in tt* m»r
Ctt. UN bleety, d»i» dc/
varioui ahadti of fray.
ytlla>, ell»«, and brown.
Mrdtt cklearvaiB nedulai arc
ii am ii Iftnd it aray te tram.
•ram, inurMdtd wltr. r*/
clay, (and it P*U» te flnt
Aturmtlng btdi AT fray da/,
tirff, aw avid. Ie*tr auvfc
Mr,- tot hard, «»JU, and bavt
opalM afeMranei.
Altcrmtlnf b>di of frry aind.
mn*fi.er* , and ahtlt.
•tKlaa aapraMlom
Ooour* along ttw binJu e(
•Mile •ua«M and in
tM flood plain of «M
•ratot Wvar. fcirly
fiat attin. Hnt
ndcU* te Art^rcvn
and Bias aolla.
ceeun only along tft*
frlnox of tM •(•tai
«lv«r fioaa elatn.
ronM latatly flat, mrrev
Sain, apiji art fray
blaa. blacky.
•Mrly fiat, faituralou
Blum aeila art light
eel or ad, flnc-graimd
•and) . OBBura only
•long aeutharn odg* of
am.
Ptonni nit pi aim in tM
•eut/wnt ont-ttlrd of
tltt ceuntitti BOR of
tut riar-grorlng arai la
on tM axerop. Pent*
llght-oelercd aanay
lav aeila.
Km* ott ftnUy-nllin;
amnd bill* of nertMrn
ValJtr 0»irt>- and etntral
AMUn ftwity. Itoat of
tnt araval plu in Awun
(baity art in tM taatl
MUlia. OMM un audy
•oil a.
Oceuri a* laelatfd aurfaet
•jBoaum btciia* tr*
Oollad la ovtrlAjpecd by
tM NillU Crnd or ia
aacily ranevad by araalen
ftma fray. Kicky aeila.
Ifeially eoouri along
•tllty bottom and valla.
PDCM tM rolling and
aUawettd tepagratry
•f i«rtt>arn Aianin
fttfity. Ifem* oray te
BlKk lav andaandy
lavaeila.
OKI net orop out In Aiatln
•r Halltr (bintiM.
Mftieult te dittlngul*
fro* orarlying naaing
•bnaUon in both aurtaot
a^oauraa and in vtll
lop-
OMI net crop out In Auvtin
ec NtlJtr (boiUa*.
Maur-bwing fropirun in
AuRiit and Voliar Cbinttta
Hold* «Mll te laxgt aneviii ef
frtah vaur in tM fiood piatn ef
tM Itatoa Uvar.
llaldi aaali te aoairatt a«oirt( ef
vaur to aatuttd ana:]o» ««JJ»
law tMr 100 f«tt drep ajon; tM
•dgt of tM araioi ajvti Dooo
plain.
Hold* Baal] BHirta of vtur te
•caturod ahalla* «nlla.
Cbnuitutt* OMll te aoonatt
•mrti of froan »«t«i te dawttic
««ll* in tnt OMtMin pirt of tnt
art*) probably trproatntte by tnt
•Pfvnoat aua aerawd in tMat
wlla.
Maid* BtalJ te largi awirt* of
f raah «ot*r te valla.
Yielai l*rg» anowiti ef frtah MUC
te valla.
Tloldi anall te larft amnt* ef
frooh te allghUy aUint vaur.
**>y yltld anall •notnti ef frt»h
•our in tM aott nortntrn
•art of Aurtin Cbinty. Oeneruiy
vmur l» at loavt alightly aalint.
would yiald only aalint vttti.
*»«t Vattr Orvalepnam Beard, Mtpen «l
-------
Figure 4 describes a general cross-section of site hydrogeology. The first
water-bearing unit, which is referred to as the water table aquifer, is identi-
fied in the cross-section as Stratum B. This aquifer is part of the sediments
of the Brazos River Alluvium. The second water-bearing unit, know as the con-
fined aquifer, is identified as Stratum D. This unit is part of the Evangeline
aquifer. The clay layer know as Stratum E lies beneath the confined aquifer
at about 100 feet in depth and was the deepest unit investigated at the site.
Ground water in the water table and confined aquifers generally flows towards
the river, in a northwestern direction. However, during high river stage
conditions (less than one third of the time) ground water flow in the water
table aquifer may shift to the west and south. The predominant vertical
hydraulic gradient is upwards towards the water table aquifer.
1.4 SITE INVESTIGATION RESULTS
A. Soil and Sludge
Extensive sampling of the site has focused on areas which are in close
proximity to visible waste or were known to have received waste. Those
areas include the lagoon, lagoon dikes and the evaporation system. Sam-
ples were also obtained from unaffected soils (background) on site, and
water and sediment from the Brazos River and Clark Lake. A detailed
description of this information nay be found in the site RI/FS and Risk
Assessment. A summary of the site data is found in Tables 2a and 2b.
Sludges in the lagoon range in thickness fron about six inches to three
feet. A water layer floats on top of the sludge and the water is covered
in part by a thin oil and emulsion layer. The highest levels of contam-
inants detected at the site were found in the lagoon sludge.
The nost significant classes of compounds found in the sludge in terms of
concentration and toxicity include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The highest concentrations of benzene
and toluene (two VOCs) detected are 2500 ppm and 36,600 ppm, respectively.
The highest concentration of PCBs found at the site is 223 ppm. High
levels of base neutral compounds such as napthalene and phenols were also
detected in the lagoon sludge. Of the heavy metals present, zinc was found
at the highest levels (13,800 ppm).
The majority of the contamination identified in the evaporation system is
fouivj in isolated sludge deposits near the point of discharge from the
lagoon to the evaporation system. Contaminants in the evaporation system
sludge are similar to those in the lagoon hut at lower concentrations. The
remainder of evaporation system soils are generally characteristic of local
background soils.
Sampling of the dike indicates that it contains a layer of affected soils
and sludge at about three feet below the surface. Concentrations of con-
-------
Hid3Q
(1334 30VHO
1
HSIAl) 133d-NOIiVA313
FIGURE 4
GENERAL SCHEMATIC SITE GEOLOGY
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
-------
r . £ J
{{i!
Mil
IS'5
H
ii
1 =
5*
!j
s
&
f
f
t
I
I
r
R
iiij I
ii I l
««!J
. (•
s
4* • »
ft ft ft
*••*»*
iiii
«iji
xx-5
nit
r s s s
3 = i*
• A
M ft
xx**
i*
. .
£ £ r r
{*
M
««J!
(
j *
i
x:::x*xx'«**xxsx i
:|§;;:::;;;j;:j: i
* s
««•«•«•«« *"»»*i^»*i*i"^ C
•
:,:<{.. .p. ...i. |
* V •
m.,i..,uui,i s
• •• •••* •
s'i'ss'silt's^ss s
i i i • iiii s s
jf"» S • • • «
£.•• •«•£ 5
s 5 i 2 1 r r i s -
"5s5"s""lri5""5"
1
•
| =
SIS
" s
is?
ts
r
8?
5 «
|L
!ij
* S
1 8
r!S
« §
«
|I.
8 S
h
! 9
Is
t .
!«
T S
8 *
5 »
«*
i
f
1
1
«
*
L
H
s i
i S
[S
*
\
\
\
\\
ii
ij
• •
l\
-------
S 9
I =
1 1
i!
• *
l!
s*
!l
t i
25
§ :
'i
t
f
•
!
^
*
1
. i >
c 1 1
pi
s
«
f
•
s
{
I
i
i
t
s
i
I
•
£
2
i
s
i
i
z
c
I
.
i
i
I
i
•
i
£
8
£
•
g
*
«
i
A
•
w
—
.
f
i
V
i
i
s
8
M
•' 2
i i i •' •' I •.
888- *j
555
M M »
£ S £ £ S
888 88
• i i
•88 21
C i 9 Z 5
r j ; . r f
W V
*
•»
SIS 1C
s . - s s
f s „ : f
... ji
888 5 S
: = s :•
T T : § I
i s s c s
Hi H
?!! ss
t S f
• j
... • •
•» M M • •
2 • r
^if I HIHiiHHfil |
HH s l|||{i|!fi||f|jl
| ' Is f: '• *
1 5f
•
•
£ S £ £ £££•££££££££ |
ss ss SHHHiH!^ §
•
£*»«•*» M«»SB*4fft»to«toVtototo •
****** • M • MM MMMbiM J
**** * *•••»**•** «»
•*:f ££££££££££££££
HI! srrssrsrrsrrss |
5?*.* ?!!? ?•*£ .***".* •
HI! H! !ii| iiiss
£555 S S S 5 ? S S S i S S SS S J
SSS SS*S S'*SS *
s
•
t
i ! 5
1' l
t
i 8 8 *
ji!
:«? U
: 5 * S r
i» 5
• I "
iij !
^s' i n s
• M ^ » K A »
ils If:
: i 2 SIS
: 8 * s . =
: 2!S S s r
ir! --I
' w
: | 5 s
• • ^
• «• M
• * • 6
• I - £ <
ih i
ii fi
•is n
:?! IS
!|5 =
i? i
i 1= §
i*; i
: 8 » s
• t* S
• p»
-------
iniiii
'.'--,:'.'-
»;fi»»
Mil"
I'M!
* i s * Jfi
=:«!is
!i!!i
flu?!
if!:?!
«f'-^r
r*iH
«!!
? - s
[ii
I?!
»{&=::»:
«»5c»»»*
i*« '"l
: I
• 5
5
i
!:f!
«SSSSS.SSS:.SSSj£S5SSSS
>. a a a .
* I
":8-S«t
5
S S 5 S I
zi
-S S5"-
*
!
»
^
fh
55
S
u
s|f
!=IB
i o
«• 5
I?!
5
i
Ii .
H :
! "
» A
« v
C •
-------
taminants of concern 1n this layer are generally at least ten times less
concentrated than those found in the lagoon. Surface contamination is also
visible on the dike. This contamination is most pervasive in the tank
and incinerator area of the dike. The extent of this contamination
on the dike was not determined during the RI/FS; however, confirmatory
sampling during remedy implementation will verify that all contamination
above the action level is addressed by the remedial action.
The cost estimates developed for the alternatives used a common design
based on the following estimated waste volumes:
Pond sludge 30,000 yd^
Affected soil under pond 10,000 yd::
Evaporation System Sludge 1,000 yd.
Oily-dike surface soil 3,000 yd3
Floating Oil & Emulsion 300 yd3
These estimates are based on a 25 ppm PCS cleanup level as well as a visual
estimate of highly contaminated soils and wastes.
B. Surface Water
Sampling of the Brazos River downstream and upstream of the site indi-
cated that there was no measureable difference between the downstream and
upstream samples. Sediment samples were also obtained from the river
bottom at locations downstream and upstream of the site. Concentrations
of organic constituents indicated that the site had not impacted the
sediment however, concentrations of metals were slightly higher in the
downstream sample than the upstream sample. Analyses of Clark Lake water
and sediments do not exhibit elevated levels of site contaminants.
C. 'Ground Water
Over thirty wells have been installed at the site in both the shallow and
deep aquifers to determine the extent of contamination and evaluate site
hydrogeology. Tables 3a and 3b show the highest levels of contaminants
detected in the shallow wells to date. No contamination has been detected
in the deep aquifer. The only group of contaminants identified in the
shallow ground water are volatile organics. The highest concentration of
contaminant detected during recent sampling was benzene, at 0.027 ppm.
The Ground water Migration Management RI/FS is ongoing, and the Record of
Decision for the Ground Water operable unit is expected to be completed
by September 1989. However the remedy for the Source Control operable
unit described in this Record of Decision will be fully consistent with
the ultimate remedy for the site.
-------
8
i
v
•
n
§
£
•»
^
^
»
«»
•
1
<
_
A
C
~
S
*
!
O
i
8
•
|
•w
It
e
pot 1 1 1 v
*
f 5£
to
li
I ?
< A
A O
f s
3
^
i
±
I
3
_
S
4*
i
_
i
S
v
S
»
~
•
|
g
8
i
o
S
S
2
• 0
^ V
M Z
<*t e
1 :
| r
"" n
2 S
i *
^ ^
A »
rt
S
r
s
1
e
*"
|
e
I
e
5
••
e
••
5
?? r|P
* •- ? 2
5 i A" 8
: =8§
— 288
o 8 J §
r i ! !
r s * s
*•
S
1 111
5 r 5 :
S III
I t t I
i 5 r 8
e
5 5SS
V
8 858
S S § 2
8 8 i &
e o — •
i| : ?
s
i
11 !
**
o —
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
IE!
• «" Z
•it
— A
a ••
s
s i
s
A
S
i i
s
i ,
s *
s
e.
i i
? "
a
i .
I i
i f
s :
a
§ ;
i ; £
^ •» •»
— A »
3-8,
f i s I
£ S £ *
w = •»
2 2 £
A3?
•• — 3
w o —
r » "
- 5
-------
§"*
* n
•o e 8 88
n £.£.£.£
3
** X • X
? ._ B 06
.egg
grr^
•~*P B"
• o o o
o KO ff> o
*w«^«^* (•?
•oBSS
b'SS$
— * o->~
P
e
0880
0800
••<—..— e
^•fc • • Ot
• o O"^
o o o.
•"* B 2
•—^.^^ o
2*3 — •*»»«
it i re o . —
-jc it S re o
II ? '
i
B B B B B B
(71 171 (71 ?
B B B B B B
(T IP y? U?
5
8 8
(71 (71
B 8
I/I (71
S 88
8 B
(7i in
e $
^ *-»
tn ur
8 8
B B
(71 Wl
8 B
(71 I/I
8 8
5 B
§ ft 2.
m It ~
re
>. s o
rx> C 5
1C *J 1 *
1 -V. w
5^.to
IS) I IS)
1C OB — —
••j ro.
SE*
n
it
c
r*
b
9
r!
-no
Is?
o. to
"5
»!!!
8 8
CD <^>
i^
8"- IN) Z fSJ
in in B «S
o S 8 o
f IS> S t-J
in in (7i
e? o
00
• • O 9
oo o 5
*• O 9l Ul
B B
b§88
88 88
(71 (/> (71 ^71
gin — Z
• WO
n »^ •
% OB
z Z £ S s fi
B S in in in in
5 O
klls
B 8888
X -^EO
9 r\: i —
1C OC U) N9
-------
D. Air
Extensive air sampling has been completed at the site. No priority pollu-
tant constituents were detected at concentrations above ambient background
levels.
1.5 TREATABILITY TESTING
While generally available information will give an indication of the potential
applicability of a given remedial technology, performance of actual laboratory
tests using site-specific materials is often a better method for determining
the appropriateness of a remedial technology. For this reason, treatability
studies were performed at the Sheridan site. The Sheridan Site Committee
elected to undertake studies to evaluate the applicability of Biotreatment,
Solvent Extraction and Stabilization technologies to treat site wastes. The
results of these studies are presented in Appendices B, C and D of the FS and
summarized below.
The Sheridan Site Committee conducted stabilization tests on samples of sludge
obtained from the lagoon. Sludge was stabilized by Committee consultants using
fly ash and samples were also sent to two stabilization vendors, Enreco and
Soliditech for stabilization using their proprietary methods. Fly ash alone
was not found to result in a stabilized waste with sufficient structural
strength to support earth moving equipment during the construction of a cap.
The proprietary methods improved compressive strength characteristics but
leaching tests of the stabilized wastes indicated significant levels of vola-
tile organic compounds such as benzene in the leachate. The Site Committee
has also conducted additional stabilization testing which will be discussed
in the Responsiveness Summary.
Two phases of biotreatment studies were conducted by the Sheridan Site Commit-
tee. Samples of lagoon sludge were placed in aqueous hioreactors containing
organism seed materials. Soil obtained from the edge of the lagoon, sludge
from an industrial waste treatment lagoon and proprietary seed from General
Electric and Microbe Masters were used as sources of microorganisms in the
experiments. The reactors were generally operated under aerobic conditions
and sufficient nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus) were added as necessary to
maintain the microorganisms.
Sampling of the reactors was conducted after 71 days and semiquantitative
mass balances were conducted to evaluate the amount of contaminant removal
which occurred. This analysis indicated that essentially all the volatile
organics present in the sludge were removed and at least 84 percent of the
semi-volatile organics were degraded. The amount of organic reduction due to
volatilization was not determined in the studies. The PCB removal results
were less clear due to high PCB detection levels and variable original PCB
content of the sludge, but they suggested that some PCB reduction had occurred.
-------
A sample of lagoon sludge was sent to the Resources Conservation Company for
treatment using their proprietary "B.E.S.T" solvent extraction techniques.
In this method, the sludge is separated into three distinct phases, oil,
solids and water. The PCBs and other organic constituents are concentrated
1n the oil which is then treated by methods such as incineration or chemical
dechlorination. The metals present were concentrated in the solid phase.
This method was found to effectively segregate PCBs into the oil layer and
the solids generated would probably not require disposal as a hazardous waste.
1.6 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE SITE ON HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
The assessment of risk posed by the Sheridan site was evaluated in the
Sheridan Risk Assessment. This assessment examined the amount, concentra-
tion, properties, and environmental fate and transport of chemical found at
the site; the populations and environments potentially at risk; exposure
pathways; and potential exposure events. The document described the risks
associated with current and future (probable and worst-case) exposure scena-
rios. The numerical cancer risk values discussed below are theoretical
quantifications of the excess lifetime cancer risk, that is, the increased
probability of contracting cancer as a result of exposure to wastes, compared
to the probability if no exposure occurred. For example, a 10"° excess
cancer risk represents an exposure that could result in one extra cancer
case per million people exposed.
Under current conditions which assume restricted site access and maintenance
of the site, the only potentially significant pathway is migration of contam-
inants into the Brazos River. This pathway was modelled using very conserv-
ative assumptions, resulting in an upper hound excess cancer risk from the
ingestion of PCBs in fish of 1.5 X 10"^. Modelling using less conservative
assumptions indicated that the 1 X 10~5 excess cancer risk would not he
exceeded.
Both models utilized are relatively conservative. However, neither model
is capable of accounting for processes such as sorption to colloids and
enhanced solubility due to co-solvent effects, which are recognized as
facilitating the transport of PCBs in ground water. Although these pro-
cesses cannot be accounted for by modelling, they increase the potential
for PCBs to affect the river.
The second scenario evaluated was the nost probable future land use which
assumed continued agricultural (rangeland) land use and unrestricted access to
the waste disposal area. Under this scenario, there are two major exposure
pathways in addition to the ground water transport pathway described in the
current scenario. These pathways are 1), direct contact (ingestion and dermal
absorption) with sludge and 2), release of all site wastes into the Brazos
-------
River due to the eventual erosion and failure of the river bank between waste
and the river.
The total excess cancer risk due to direct contact with site sludge was cal-
culated to be about 7x10 . The risk associated with the river bank erosion
scenario was not quantified because it is impossible to accurately predict
the rate of erosion, subsequent bank failure and release of contaminants
into the river. However, the potential risks due to biological uptake of
wastes may be significant.
The last scenario evaluated in the Risk Assessment is the worst-case scenario
of residential development adjacent to the waste areas. The pathways pre-
viously described for the current and most likely future use scenarios would
be similar in the residential scenario. However, an additional exposure path-
way of ingestion of contaminated ground water would result in a total excess
cancer risk greater than 1 x 10"3 as well as a significant non-carcinogenic
risk. This Record of Decision will address the ground water exposure pathway
by eliminating the source of continued contamination.
The preceding paragraphs describe potential impacts to human health. In addition
to impacts to human health, the lagoon sludge poses an environmental threat to
wildlife, especially birds which may land on its surface and die from contact
with the sludge.
II. ENFORCEMENT
The Sheridan Site Committee has identified over 150 potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) for the site. To date, 102 Notice/104(e) information requests
were sent to site PRPs. Remaining PRPs will be notified when Special Notice
letters are issued. EPA will continue its enforcement activities and send
Special Notice Letters to PRPs prior to the initiation of the renedial design.
Should the PRPs decline to conduct future remedial activities, EPA will
either take enforcement actions or provide funding for these activities
while seeking cost recovery for all EPA-funded response actions from the
PRPs.
III. COMMUNITY RELATIONS
In general, there has been a long history of citizen awareness of the
Sheridan Disposal Services site. In the early 1970s when incineration at
the site resulted in air emissions, people living within a 7-mile radius
complained. In 1971 a citizens' group submitted a petition with over 500
signatures to the Texas Water Quality Board calling for its closure.
However, community concerns of either the area residents or local officials
are now very low, probably because the site has been inactive since 1984.
Also the site is relatively remote and there are no residences within a nile,
-------
On November 15, 1988, EPA issued a press release and the Proposed Plan fact
sheet was mailed on November 9. The press release was sent to all news
organizations in the Houston/Hempstead/Brenham area. The fact sheet was
mailed to 92 residents and local officials. Extra copies of the fact sheet
were provided to the five area repositories.
In accordance with CERCLA, Section 117, the press release and proposed plan
fact sheet announced the comment period of November 15 through December 15,
1988. A public meeting was held on November 22, 1988, at the Waller County
Courthouse. Forty people attended the meeting and two made statements or
asked questions. Additional written comments were received from four people
or organizations.
IV. ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION
4.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
In accordance with Section 121 (a), (b), and (d) of the Superfund Amendnents
and Reauthorization Act (SARA), EPA has determined that nine factors must
be considered in selecting a remedy for a Superfund site. These items are
summarized below:
1. Consistency with Other Environmental Laws
In determining appropriate remedial actions at Superfund sites, considera-
tion must be given to the requirements of other Federal and State environ-
mental laws, in addition to CERCLA as anended by SARA. Primary considera-
tion is given to attaining applicable or relevant and appropriate Federal
and State public health and environmental laws and regulations and stan-
dards. Not all Federal and State environmental laws and regulations are
"applicable to each Superfund response action. The compliance of each
remedial alternative with all applicable or relevant and appropriate
environmental laws is discussed in Appendix C.
2. Reduction of Toxicity. Mobility or Volume
The degree to which alternatives employ treatment that reduces toxicity,
mobility or volume must be assessed. Relevant factors include:
o the treatment processes the proposed solutions employed and materials
they treat;
o the amount of contaminated materials that will be destroyed or treated;
o the degree of expected reduction in toxicity, mobility, or volume;
o the residuals that will remain following treatment, considering the
persistence, toxicity, mobility, and propensity for bioaccunulation
of such hazardous substances and their constituents.
-------
3. Short-term Effectiveness
The short-term effectiveness of an alternative must be assessed consider-
ing the following:
o Magnitude of reduction of existing risks; and
o short-term risks that might be posed to the community, workers, or
the environment during the implementation of an alternative including
potential threats to human health or the environment associated with
excavation, transportation, and redisposal or containment.
4. Long-tern Effectiveness and Permanence
Alternatives are assessed for the long-term effectiveness and permanence
they afford along with the degree of certainty that the remedy will
prove successful. Factors considered are:
o Magnitude of residual risks in terms of amounts and concentrations of
wastes remaining following implementation of a remedial action, consider-
ing the persistence, toxicity, mobility, and propensity for bioaccumula-
tion of such hazardous substances and their constituents;
o type and degree of long-term management required, including monitoring
and operation and maintenance;
o potential for exposure of human and environmental receptors to remaining
waste considering the potential threat to human health and the environ-
ment associated with excavation, transportation, redisposal, or contain-
ment ;
o long-term reliability of the engineering and institutional controls,
including uncertainties associated with the land disposal of untreated
wastes and residuals; and
o potential need for replacement of the remedy.
5. Implementability
The ease or difficulty of implementing the alternatives are assessed by
considering the following factors;
o Degree of difficulty associated with constructing the solution;
o expected operational reliability of the treatment technology;
o need to coordinate with and obtain necessary approvals and permits
(or meet the intent of any permit in the case of Superfund actions);
-------
10
o availability of necessary equipment and specialists; and
o available capacity and location of needed treatment, storage, and
disposal services.
6. Costs
The types of costs that should be assessed include the following:
o Capital costs;
o operation and maintenance costs;
o net present value of capital and operation and maintenance cost; and
o potential future remedial action costs.
7. Community Acceptance
This assessment should evaluate:
o Components of remedial alternatives that the community supports;
o features of the alternatives about which the community has
reservations; and
o elements of the alternatives which the community strongly opposes.
8. State Acceptance (through the Texas Water Commission)
Evaluation includes assessment of:
o Components of remedial alternatives that the State supports;
o features of the alternatives about which the State has reservations; and
o elements of the alternatives which the State strongly opposes.
9. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Following the analysis of the remedial options against individual
evaluation criteria, the alternatives are assessed from the standpoint
of whether they provide adequate protection of human health and the
environment.
EPA is also directed by Superfund law (SARA) to give preference to solu-
tions that utilize treatment to remove contaminants from the environment.
Offsite transport and disposal without treatment is the least preferred
option where practicable treatment technologies are available.
-------
11
4.2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES
In conformance with the National Contingency Plan (NCP), initial remedial
approaches were screened to determine which might be appropriate for this
site (see the Sheridan Disposal Services Feasibility Study for details of
this evaluation). From these possible remedies, five were chosen for more
detailed evaluation and comparison with the remedy selection criteria out-
lined above. In addition, "No Action" was evaluated to comply with the
requirements of the NCP. Each remedy is summarized below. Common elements
of all the plans include the following activities:
o Install a RCRA-compliant cap over the entire pond and dike area.
o Install a flexible spur jetty river bank erosion control system in
the Brazos River.
o Monitor ground water quality for a minimum of 30 years.
o Decontaminate, disassemble and properly dispose of all on-site tanks
and processing equipment.
o Properly dispose of any drums encountered during remediation.
Contents of intact drums will be treated on-site or disposed of off-
site, depending on the nature of the material.
o Treat potentially contaminated stormwater and waste-water streams
resulting from the waste treatment alternatives, to remove solids,
metal, and organic constituents. The treated water will comply with
all Federal/State standards for discharge into the Brazos River.
o Imple-nent institutional controls to preclude use of contaminated
ground water and ensure the long-term integrity of the cap.
Alternative 1; No Action - This alternative requires the sealing of old
wells and installation of new monitoring wells, as necessary, and ground
water monitoring for a minimum of 30 years.
Alternative 2; Soil Mixing - This alternative involves mixing one part
contaminated soil and sludge with six parts clay rich soil to reduce excess
moisture and provide a structurally stable foundation for the cap. The
soil and waste mixture would be placed into a RCRA-compliant landfill in
the main pond. The estimated cost of this alternative is $20,656,000.
Alternative 3; Stabilization - This alternative involves uniformly mixing
the contaminated soil and sludge with a solidifying agent such as cement or
flyash to form a solid material. Chemical additives may be added to reduce
the Teachability of contaminants or to improve strength or any other desir-
-------
12
I
able property. After the waste is stabilized, it would be placed into a
RCRA-compliant landfill in the main pond. The estimated cost of this
' alternative is $18,856,000.
Alternative 4; Biotreatment - This alternative would utilize an on-site
I aqueous biological system to remove organic waste constituents from the
contaminated soils and sludge. Biotreatment will be conducted in tanks or
Impoundments and a pilot study will be conducted during remedial design to
optimize biodegradation processes. This alternative will effectively remove
all volatile and semi-volatile constituents fron the waste. Emissions of
volatile organic compounds during biotreatment will be destroyed using a
fume incinerator, carbon absorption or equivalent system. During the design,
all reasonable efforts will be made to optimize biodegradation of PCBs. If
Biotreatment can reduce the level of PCBs in the residual to less than 50
ppm, the residuals will be stabilized, returned to the pond and capped. If
the concentration of PCBs in the biotreatment residuals is greater than 50
ppm, they will be stabilized and returned to a RCRA-compliant landfill in
the pond area. The estimated cost of the alternative is $28,346,000.
Alternative 5: Solvent Extraction - This alternative utilizes a chemical
solvent(s) to separate the waste into oil, solids and water. Organic con-
taminants would be concentrated into the oil which would be incinerated onsite
in a mobile incinerator or off-site. Metals would concentrate in the
solid phase. These solids would be stabilized, if necessary, returned to
the pond area, and capped. The water generated would be treated in the on-
site waste water treatment system to remove inorganic and organic contami-
nants and discharged to the river. The estimated cost of this alternative
is $36,508,000.
\
' Alternative 6: Incineration - This alternative uses a rotary kiln to
destroy essentially all of the organic contaminants in the waste. The ash
will be transported to a RCRA-conpliant off-site landfill for disposal. The
i estimated cost of this alternative is $39,610,000.
4.3 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
The following values were assigned to compare remedial selection criteria:
"+" Alternative should exceed a criterion in comparison to other
alternatives.
"0" Alternative should meet the selection criterion.
"-" Alternative will not meet a criterion, or will not meet a
criterion as well as other alternatives.
A "+/0" or "-/O" designation indicates that the alternative is intermediate in
-------
13
ranking between the + and the 0 or - and the 0 ratings. The rationale for
the ratings assigned to each alternative is presented in the following sub-
sections:
1. Compliance with ARARs
With the exception of the No Action alternative, all alternatives were
rated "0" because they are designed to comply with ARARs described in
Appendix A. The No Action remedy was rated "-" because it does not meet
closure ARARs or the requirements of the PCB Spill Cleanup Policy and it
does not address risk-based remedial objectives.
2. Reduction of Mobility, Toxicity and Volune
The No Action alternative is ranked "-" because it does nothing to reduce
toxicity, mobility or volume. Soil Mixing is also ranked "-" since it
minimally reduces waste mobility via largely reversible chemical reac-
tions with the soil matrix but does not reduce waste toxicity and greatly
increases waste volume. Stabilization is rated "0" because it more
effectively reduces waste mobility than soil mixing, but does not signif-
icantly reduce toxicity, and increases waste volume. In Biotreatment,
most of the organic contaminants will be destroyed and mobility and
overall waste volume reduced. Therefore, Biotreatment is rated "+/0".
Incineration and Solvent Extraction (in conjunction with incineration)
are ranked "+" since both result in the greatest reduction of toxicity,
mobility and volume.
3. Short-Term Effectiveness
With the exception of the No Action alternative, which is ranked "-",
all alternatives effectively reduce the magnitude of existing short-
term risks in two to five years. The time to complete remediation
is two years for Soil Mixing and Stabilization, three years for Biotreat-
ment, four years for Solvent Extraction and five years for Incineration.
Also, the alternatives differ with regard to risks to the community,
workers, or the environment during Implementation. All action alterna-
tives involve the risks attendant to construction involving heavy earth
work, including risks to workers and environmental impacts due to dust
and noise. Further, all action alternatives will release volatile
organics to some degree as the pond sludge is removed for treatment.
The risks associated with Soil Mixing and Stabilization occur over the
shortest time. However, the volatile emissions resulting from these
alternatives should be greater than Biotreatment, which will control
fugitive emissions during treatment. Therefore, Soil Mixing and Stabil-
ization are ranked "0" and Biotreatment is ranked "+". Solvent
Extraction will require slightly longer to complete and involve additional
handling and processing equipment and is also ranked "0". The Incineration
-------
14
alternative is ranked "-" because of increased risks to on-s1te workers
due to increased materials handling requirements and unit processes
involving high temperature combustion, rotary machinery and periodic
vessel entry, and its longer period of operation.
4. Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
Except for the No Action alternative, which is ranked "-", a major dif-
ference between the alternatives is the degree which they minimize the
long-term risks from leaching of waste constituents and exposure to resi-
dual waste. The Soil Mixing alternative is ranked "-" because waste
constituents are less effectively immobilized than in other alternatives
and this alternative results in a larger residual volume relative to
other alternatives. The Stabilization alternative is ranked "O/-"
because the degree of mobility reduction for the Stabilization alterna-
tive is probably greater than for Soil Mixing, but the residuals will
contain significantly more contaminants and be of greater volume than
other alternatives. The Biotreatment alternative is ranked "+" because
this process would destroy the mobile organic compounds contained within
the waste, that is, the volatiles and semivolatiles. Certain compounds,
such as PCBs, would be more difficult to degrade. Even if not degraded,
however, the potential for mobility of these compounds would be reduced
through elimination of the more mobile constituents in the waste matrix
and stabilization. Incineration and Solvent Extraction are ranked "+"
because they are the only alternatives which destroy essentially all of
the organic contaminants in the waste and involve the least residual
volume.
5. Implementahility
.The No Action alternative would be the easiest to implement and is rated
"+". Among the remaining alternatives, the Soil Mixing and Stabilization
alternatives are readily implenentahle. They are ranked "+" because they
are mechanically simple and readily adaptable to field conditions, and
they do not require special equipment or off-site facilities. The
Biotreatment alternative 1s ranked "0" because it will probably require
the construction of specialized treatment tanks to accommodate the special
mixing and sludge handling needs of that alternative. Still, Biotreatment
is a demonstrated technology, is adaptable to unexpected waste characte-
ristics and does not require operators with a high level of training. By
contrast, the Solvent Extraction and Incineration alternatives are ranked
"-" because these technologies are mechanically complex, require highly
specialized equipment and operators, and may require an approved off-site
-------
15
disposal facility for ash. In addition, Solvent Extraction may he diffi-
cult to adapt in the field.
6. Cost
Estimated costs for each alternative are summarized in Table 4. Included
1n this table are total capital costs, total post-closure operation and
maintenance costs, total present worth and replacement costs. Replacement
costs were included to evaluate the potential costs that would be incurred
if the alternative were to fail. The likelihood of failure is largely
determined by the degree the alternatives ensure the long-term permanence
and effectiveness of the remedy. As described in Section 4.3, Soil Mixing
and Stabilization receive the lowest rating for Long-term Effectiveness
and Permanence and are therefore most likely to require replacement in
the future. The replacement costs are estimated assuming on-site incine-
ration is used as the replacement technology and vary according to the
estimated residual volume which would require treatment.
Community Acceptance
The community has voiced limited support for the Biotreatment alternative
and has not expressed any concerns about the alternative. Therefore
hiotreatment is rated "+" and all other alternatives are rated "0".
8. State Acceptance
The State of Texas, through the Texas Water Commission, has indicated that
they have no objection to the selected alternative. Therefore, Biotreat-
nent is rated "+" and all remaining alternatives are rated "0".
9. Overall Protection of Human Health, Environment
The No Action alternative is ranked "-" because the potential exposures
by direct contact to waste, bank failure and inundation of the wastes and
leaching to groundwater are not controlled. All remaining alternatives
prevent these exposures but differ in the degree they ensure long-term
effectiveness and permanence and achieve short-term effectiveness. There-
fore, Soi? Mixing is ranked "07-" because it results in the greatest volume
of waste residual without significant treatment. Stabilization is ranked
"0" because it decreases the mobility of the waste without decreasing waste
tcx^t'ty; however, it increases waste volume. Biotreatment is ranked "+"
because this alternative degrades most organic waste constituents as well
as reducing waste mobility and volume. Solvent Extraction is ranked "+"
because all contaninants are destroyed to the maximum extent possible.
Incineration also achieves similar destruction, hut is rated "+/0" because
it is less effective in the short-term.
-------
re
ro
c v> <
•o re o>
r* 40 c
o —• re
«<
10
00
&;&)-".—. _,.
< O rt fti
n »««< -o
^
—• < ft> "J
3030
< —• ft> X
O C —• -.
— 1 *< 3
< re in S
re —• r»
to — •«o re
B> n o io
-j s — •
o> rc> — s
i a. «< n
•*»«/> re
o re re
O. &> Oi 3-
3 — re
—• Q. C
s a> n
n r» r» O
n 3- re IA
n> —• a. if
a> 10
10
it
io o. —. n,
ID 3 O.
—• re n
= -j c
< re »/>
«-*• o &> —<.
3- — CO 3
n c re io
31» o re
» •» x
& i/> •«
w n -j re
-• 3 n n
»• io Q. r*
-*• — • c re
—* rt r> O-
*< —• o re
,rt 3 i/i
S3
ft)
X)
ft<
n
n
o
o
O
rt
ft>
•o
re
tn
re
|
U>
»j
O
- ^
—• CD r* r*
3 n 0> ft,
rt en —. I-
re rt
? —• -o r>
a- o o a-
3 3 «/» -o
O r» -J.
ft ft" (t
«S £2 °
O CL. —' —-
O o
* y o
r» C o
w -i IA
VD
O
8
o
§
rf ft. Q.
C O 3 c
O, o O. &
«< 10 _
00
O -J
• re
8ft
o re
M ••
0^
O rf
O 3-
O>
3
ro
ro
o
V
ro
>—>
9)
V
8
0
VO
so
A
V
8
o
VO
•
tf,
er.
ISJ
o,
Si
-H
0*
o
r- 3*
2-<
x ro
8
o
00
8
o
ro
«»j
w
IX)
1C
SO
CJ
V
8
o
no
00
CO
ca
i 8
CD
o
•H
o H-
00
«
o
o
U)
SO
w
ro
ro
o
00
vT>
U)
•
O
o
o
u>
V
o
o
o
en
on
VI
«
8
o
u>
CO
8
0
o
&.
r» ^
re
j o >
•30 I- P-
X-l
o m
z in
> en
—i
o
-------
16
4.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Site operation and maintenance will include a program for sampling on-site
ground water monitoring wells. Additional site maintenance will include, hut
not be limited to inspection and repair (as necessary) of the erosion control
system in the Brazos River, the cap or landfill and the perimeter fence, and
maintenance of surface vegetation and appropriate drainage. The details of
these activities will be defined in the Operation and Maintenance Plan of the
remedial design.
V. SELECTED REMEDY
Based on the information provided in the administrative record and the results
of the evaluation of alternatives (Section 4.3), the "final" remedy has been
selected. It is EPA's judgement that the Biotreatment alternative best satis-
fies both the statutory and selection criteria in comparison to the other
alternatives evaluated in this document.
Biotreatment will significantly reduce waste mobility, toxicity and volume
and essentially eliminate the source of contaminants to ground water.
Further, Biotreatment will result in the destruction of all mobile organics
which could migrate into the environment if the containment system were to fail
It is the least costly alternative which will attain these goals; therefore,
it is the most cost-effective alternative.
If Biotreatment can reduce the level of PCBs in the residuals to less than 50
ppm, the residuals will be stabilized, returned to the pond and capped. If
the concentration of PCBs in the hiotreated residuals is greater than 50 ppn,
they will be stabilized and returned to to a RCRA-compliant landfill in the
pond area. Waste requiring remediation by Biotreatment shall be defined as
the following:
1. All material containing greater than 25 ppm of PCBs. This material
includes the sludges contained in the pond and evaporation system;
2. Floating oil and emulsion in the pond and in on-site storage tanks;
3. Affected soil under pond - Affected soil under the pond is defined as
soil that is intermixed with sludge or contains greater than 25 ppm of
PCBs. The extent of affected soil under the pond will be determined
during the remedial design/remedial action.
4. Dike surface soils - This material shall include: 1) oily soil on the
inside dike slope between the current sludge level to the highest level
the floating oil layer has contacted; 2) Grossly contaminated soil and
sludge deposits visible on the dike. At a minimum, this shall include
the soil and sludge in the vicinity of the treatment tanks and incinerator
in the north-northeastern portions of the dike.
-------
17
5. The wastes described in items 1-4 above address all wastes containing
over 25 ppm of PCBs and/or high concentrations of other organics such
as benzene and phenol.
In addition to treating the waste described above by Biotreatment the remedy
shall also include the implementation of the common elements described in
Section 4.2. of this Record of Decision and section of 5.2 of the Source
Control FS.
-------
Appendix A
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)
Section 121(d) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA, describes the types of
standards that a remedial action is required to meet. The fundamental
standard for evaluating remedies under Section 121 remains "protection
of human health and the environment". In addition, the standards,
requirements, criteria, or limitations under any Federal environmental
law, or any more stringent State standard, that are "legally applicable"
£r "relevant and appropriate" must be met. To obtain compliance with
this requirement, remedial alternatives were analyzed to determine what
regulatory requirements would be applicable or relevant and appropriate.
Table A-l presents the universe of environmental standards that were
reviewed to determine which of them had a bearing on remedial action at
the site.
ARARs must be determined on a site-specific basis. The main feature of
the Sheridan site is the 15-acre pond or surface impoundment used for
past disposal activities. In conducting the ARARs evaluation, it became
clear that while there are various regulatory provisions that are either
applicable or relevant and appropriate depending on the type of techno-
logy utilized, the one key ARAR that would be relevant and appropriate
upon completion of the selected remedy was the surface impoundment
closure requirements under RCRA. Those closure requirements are the
foundation of the remedial alternates developed and evaluated in the
FS.
Where closure will take place with some hazardous constituents remaining
on-site, the surface impoundment must be closed as a landfill. Under
these closure requirements, free liquids would have to be removed from
the main pond. In addition, the remaining material would have to be
stabilized or solidified to a bearing capacity sufficient to support a
final cover. Finally, a cover would have to be placed over the impound-
ment designed and constructed to:
(A) Provide long-term minimization of the migration of liquids
through the closed impoundment;
(B) function with minimum maintenance;
(C) Promote drainage and minimize erosion or abrasion of the
final cover;
(D) Accommodate settling and subsidence so that the cover's
integrity is maintained; and
-------
Table A-1
STANDARDS, REQUIREMENTS, CRITERIA, OR LIMITATIONS EVALUATED
FOR ARARs DETERMINATION
Safe Drinking Water Act
Clean Water Act
Solid Waste Disposal Act (RCRA)
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
0
Occupational Safety and Health Act
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Archaeological and Historical Preservation Act
Historic Sites, Buildings and Antiquities Act
Fish and wildlife Coordination Act
Endangered Species Act
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
Wilderness Act
Scenic River Act
Coastal Zone Management Act
Texas Clean Air Act
Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act
Texas Water Code
Texas Water Quality Standards
Marine Protection, Research and Sanctions Act
Executive Order Requirements for Flood Plains and
Wetlands
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
-------
(E) Have a permeability less than or equal to the permeability of
any bottom liner or natural subsoils present.
Further, following closure, the integrity and effectiveness of the
final cover must be maintained, including making repairs as necessary.
An evaluation of the potential ARARs for affected materials and soils,
for discharge to surface water, for ground water, and for air emissions
results in the identification of the following relevant and appropriate
criteria or standards:
1. RCRA requirements contained in 40 CFR, Part 264, listed in
Table A-2.
2. RCRA requirements contained- in 40 CFR Parts 262 and 263 to the
extent that a remedial alternative involves off-site transpor -
tation of materials. Additionally, 49 CFR Parts 107 174-177
relating to Hazardous Materials Transportation would be rele-
vant and appropriate.
3. RCRA requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 264, Subpart B,
related to general facility standards, consisting of:
a. 40 CFR Section 264.14 (site security).
b. 40 CFR Section 264.17 (incompatible waste).
4. RCRA requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 264, Suhpart G,
consisting of:
a. 40 CFR Section 164.114 (equipment decontamination).
h. 40 CFR Section 264.117 (monitoring).
5. RCRA requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 264, Subpart M
relating to land treatment.
a. 40 CFR SEction 264.273.
b. 40 CFR Section 264.278.
6. RCRA requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 264, Subpart N
relating to landfills.
-------
Table A-2
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE RCRA REQUIREMENTS
A. Cover (40 CFR Part 264, Sub-part N)
1. Eliminate Free Liquids.
2. Stabilize to a bearing capacity sufficient to support
final cover.
3. Cover designed to:
a. provide long tern minimiration of migration of
liquids through closed area;
b. function with minimum maintenance;
c. promote drainage and minimize erosion;
d. accommodate settling and subsidence so that cover
integrity is maintained; and
e. have a permeability less than or equal to perme-
ability of any bottom liner system or natural
subsoil.
4. Post-Closure Designed to:
a. maintain integrity and effectiveness of cover;
b. maintain ground water monitoring system;
c. prevent run-on and run-off from eroding or other-
vise damaging final cover; and
d. prevent disturbance of cover.
B. Incinerator (40 CFR Part 264, Support 0 and 40 CFR Section
761.70)
1. Incinerator equipped with high-temperature secondary
combustion chamber and wet scrubber designed to meet
particulate, HCL and destruction removal efficiency
limitations.
-------
7. TSCA requirements contained in 40 CFR Part 761, Sub-
part D, consisting of:
a. 40 CFR section 761.70 (incineration)
8. TSCA requirements contained in 40 CFR part 761, Sub-
part G.
9. Section 4.01 of the Texas Clean Air Act.
10. Sections 329.41-.49, 333.17-.19 of Chapter 31 of Texas
Administrative Code Relating to State Water Quality
Standards as applied to the Brazos River.
11. Federal Water Quality Criteria for Fresh Water Aquatic
Life Protection, and Consumption of Organisms.
12. Clean Water Act requirements for application of best
engineering judgment prior to discharge, 40 CFR Part
125.
a. Process water and potentially contaminated storm
water collected and routed, as necessary, to
activated sludge waste water treatment system
equipped with carbon polishing.
13. All developed remedial alternatives have taken into
account Executive Order 11988 on Flood Plain Manage-
ment and will be implemented in such a manner as to
minimize any impact on the flood plain.
In addition to these ARARs, during site remediation the Worker
Health and Safety Plan would require compliance with the
relevant provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
Additional details on how these ARARs were identified are out-
lined below.
ARARs for Affected Material and Soils
RCRA Retirements
Even though they are not legally applicable, certain RCRA re-
quirements, including the RCRA design and operating standards,
may be considered relevant and appropriate based on the fact
that they address problems or situations sufficiently similar to
those encountered at the Sheridan site.
-------
Land Ban Requirements
Waste banned pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of
1984 (HSWA) cannot be placed in or on the land unless first treated to
levels achieved by best demonstrated available technology (BOAT) for
each hazardous constituent in the waste.
In order for the Land Disposal restrictions (LDR) to be ARARs for the
site, RCRA listed wastes have to have been disposed of in the lagoon,
or the waste must currently be a characteristic (i.e., corrosive, igni-
table) waste. The waste at the Sheridan site does not exhibit RCRA
characteristics and RCRA listed wastes are believed to have been dis-
posed of at the site. However, based on currently available information,
these wastes were probably incinerated on-site rather than disposed of
in the pond. Therefore, the LDR will not be considered an applicable
standard for the remedial activities at Sheridan. Additionally, because
the contaminated medium consists of soil and debris, the RCRA Land
Disposal Restrictions will not be a relevant or appropriate requirement
for the remedial activities at Sheridan since the LDR BDAT standards
were based on products in a waste stream, not soil and debris. However,
if available LDR guidance (currently undergoing revision) changes or if
additional information becomes available, the applicability of the LDR
may be reevaluated.
PCB Contaminated Waste
The presence of PCBs has been detected in samples collected at the site.
Generally, the manufacture, treatment and disposal of PCBs is regulated
under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. Section 2601
et seq. In April 1987, the EPA published a general PCB Spill Cleanup
"Policy, 40 CFR Sections 761.120-751.135 (1987). This policy is intended
to deal with unintentional spills, leaks or other uncontrolled discharges
of materials containing PCBs in concentrations of 50 ppm or greater.
This policy established requirements for the cleanup of these spills
where PCBs have been released into the environment. Different cleanup
levels are established depending upon the spill location, the potential
for exposure to residual PCBs remaining after the cleanup, the concen-
tration of PCBs initially spilled, and the nature and size of population
at risk of exposure.
By its terms, the EPA PCB spill policy only applies to spills which
occur after the effective date of the policy, which was May 4, 1987 [40
CFR Section 761.120 (a)(l)]. Clearly, these requirements are not appli-
cable to residual PCBs remaining at the Sheridan site. However, the
nature and scope of these regulations is such that they are considered
relevant to site conditions. Specifically, the level of 25 ppm in 40
CFR Section 761.125 (c)(3) is the most appropriate action level for the
Sheridan site.
-------
The T5CA cleanup policy is an ARAR that defines action levels
for cleanup. Action levels, in this sense/ are levels of con-
centration of PCBs in aaterial at or above which the naterial
•ust be remediated.
ARARs for Discharge to Surface Water
The Brazos River runs adjacent to the site and oay be subject to
point source discharges from the site during remediation. The
point sources nay consist of water generated by remedial activi-
ties as well as stormwater flows. This discharge nay be treated
as necessary by physical and chemical treatment, principally
carbon adsorption, prior to discharge. At the completion of
remediation, there will be no point source discharge.
However, at the completion of remediation, the Brazos nay be im-
pacted by a non-point source discharge, namely ground water
seepage from the upper unconfined sand zone. The only standards
that could be "legally applicable or relevant and appropriate"
to this discharge would be State water quality standards or
Federal water quality criteria.
State water quality standards are legally enforceable counter-
parts to the Federal water quality criteria. In Texas, the
State water quality standards are set forth in Chapters 319 and
333 of the rules and regulations of the Texas Water Commission.
Those standards establish certain numerical criteria which are
legally applicable to waters in the Brazos. All remedial alter-
natives are designed to satisfy the requirements of 31 TAG
Sections 319.21-29, 307.1 to 307.10 for the discharge of water
from the upper unconfined sand zone to the Brazos.
With respect to concentrations of chemicals in the river:
(1) Final Maximum Concentration Limits (NCLs) are
considered relevant and appropriate where MCLs are
available; and
(2) State and Federal water quality criteria for the
protection of human health are relevant and
appropriate where MCLs are not available.
ARARs for Ground Wat^r
The CTA's ground water protection strategy is based on the
"differential protection" of ground water (i.e., ground water
protection as it relates to a specific classification of an
aquifer). Under the strategy, ground waters are classified as
Id lows:
-------
o Class I - ground waters that are highly vulnerable and
either an irreplaceable source of drinking water or
ecologically vital;
o Class II - ground waters currently used or potentially
available for drinking water or other beneficial use;
and
o Class III - ground waters not a potential source of
drinking water and of limited beneficial use.
For Class I and Class II ground water Maximum Concentration
Limits (MCLs) established under the Safe Drinking Water Act
would be applicable for ground water sources which qualify as a
public water system or a community water system. MCLs nay also
be relevant and appropriate to ground water that would not cur-
rently qualify as such systems but could potentially so qualify
in the future. Similarly, where the State has established
drinking water standards that are more stringent than the Fe
eral MCLs, these may be applicable or relevant and appropriate.
There are two water-bearing zones underlying the site. The
uppermost zone is unconfined. The next zone, which is separated
from the upper zone by a clay aquitard, is referred to as the
confined aquifer. Where the potential ground water pathway of
concern is through a surface water discharge, risk-based numbers
often form the basis for establishing protective levels for the
saturated zone. This approach is also utilized where MCLs are
.not appropriate. Specific factors that may influence the
appropriate risk level include:
(1) Feasibility of providing an alternative water supply;
(2) Current use of the ground water;
(3) Effectiveness and reliability of institutional
controls;
(4) Ability to monitor and control the movement of con-
taminants in the ground water.
Also factored into decision making should be:
(1) Ability to limit extent of contamination;
(2) Impact of contamination on environmental receptors;
(3) Technical practicability and cost of remedial alter-
natives.
-------
Clearly, MCLs are not legally applicable to the shallow uncon-
fined ground water source at the Sheridan cite. This is not a
drinking water source being supplied to at least 25 individuals
at least 60 days out of the year. Indeed, this source is not
supplied to any individuals, any days of the year, and institu-
tional controls will be implemented to prevent its use in the
future.
The inapplicability of MCLs does not mean that this ground water
source does not need to be protected to levels that will avoid
an endangerment to human health and the environment. Since the
only receptor for this ground water source is the Brazos River,
it is expected that this standard can be achieved by ensuring
that any potential impact from the site on the ground water will
not result in levels of constituents that, once discharged to
the river, would have an adverse impact on human or aquatic
receptors. However, this must be confirmed through the demon-
stration that an alternate concentration limit is appropriate
for this site. This demonstration is currently being prepared
and it is believed that such a demonstration can be made.
Taking into account the mixing zone of initial dilution that
would result from the seepage of the shallow sand into the
Brazos River it is possible to back calculate permissible ground
water concentrations from applicable water quality standards.
Source control remediation would then need to assure that these
levels were never exceeded in the shallow unconfined ground
water zone.
AKARs for Air Emissions
Based on a review of all potentially applicable air emission-
related regulations and standards, the only "legally applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirement" for air emissions at
the completion of remediation is specified in Section 4.01 of
the Texas Clean Air Act, which provides that "no person may
cause, suffer, allow or permit the emission of air contaminants
or Ui« performance of any activity which causes or contributes
to, or which will cause or contribute to, a condition of air
pollution". "Air pollution" is defined "as the presence in the
atmosphere of one or more air contaminants or a combination
thereof, in such concentration and of such duration as may tend
to be injurious to or to adversely affect human health or the
environment, animal life, vegetation, or property, or as to
interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of animal life,
vegetation, or property."
-------
8
To assure compliance with this standard, each of the proposed
remedial alternatives contains provisions for periodic ambient
monitoring to verify that site conditions existing at the com-
pletion of remediation are not causing or contributing to a con-
dition of air pollution. All of remedial actions are designed
to insure the emissions are in compliance with this ARAR.
€
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
ftDMlNI57R«TIVE RECORD INDEX
f. i Til f ,'^r.ij; : bHi- (•: i h-Hf-! D 1 Sf-'ObHL £L KV I CI ;:
SITE WUhiDEP: TXD O&cl :
.;^D:-";. Df-iTEr 3 11 / i'9 / B B
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMKER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IMDF.'X
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofc.c:l3il'3A7
DOCUMENT NUMBER ;
DQfcUKE/M DflTF:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
.'v/ AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
urK'T TTM-E:
D 0 C U M i" t T" N Ui'' K-: c£ 3
nonr? r.T I--TF;
N'JMEZR C- PfiSEE:
fillfHO?':
C CiM^ fi.MY / P.GE.'JCT Y:
..v.Cif'JFrrv'T:
DG-TUriEN'T TYPE:
DOCUMENT MUMPER;
D.'JCI IKFNT DATE :
NUMBER OF PAGES;
OUT HOP :
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
.1.
08/£'0/70
005
Jam Bio
*»• w1 / t— '.' r r *.'
005
J a m t & 3 n, B r- o 1 o g 3 s t, ?• u b c- u r t £• c: e D: s DC s f* i1
Section
~e>«£ Witer Duality En^rc'
D : c I- W!"' i T t i r.g t I/.TI , D i rect or, F i e 1 d
Opf?»'?t J C'TiE5 Te>>cts Wff«i-er C'U£-,lity Bo^rd
Memor?nd|irii and Attachment B
K'i.'i •£h€--rid?n L"'j f..po£c*3. £>ervice, Inc. anr!
t~ie operi^lion of pr-rnutted cisposal pon.-l
:n northwest Ht?rnp£itead, TX
005
EcJ
U. C. E-IPH Ret^iOM V)
U.S. EPft Reg 3 on VI Sate? F 13 es
Site- Locs
Pc-tent i&l HarcM-doui: W^rte Site Lops for
Sh*?r- id *o Disposal Sc-?fv ice site
05/05/60
013
Torn Keern&, Erivironrnental G'Lif»)ity
Sp£5cic»J ist
Tc-'Xets Department of U'ater- Resources
U.S. EPfl Region VI Site Files
Site Inspectiori Report
Potential Hazardous Waste site Site
I lit poet ion Report for Eheriden Di&pesal
Service
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
F
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL. SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
iHJCUt'-'EKT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
f-il/rnPF.1:
c:GM-'Arjv/HGEr,c:v.:
M: UP IK NT:
f
DDtl'JKEf-'T TYPE:
JT TITLE:
OOiT.'
Thorii
Aq'i«
Grc-f-
Regi
C.-:«rr
Samp
rDCt?
5 -ie r
• n H
as C. faeo'f ord
Chew Latoratoneu, Inc.
ndyke Trc-rifc porter : on r i cs i Res u H s
le- lo^r'it ^ f ict ior'i : Pit & - top «,e.riip'c?
Jvfd 07/i^/f; j , nnelysif: U1:- 07385 for
id an Disposal- Service Superfi.incl site,
i-nti !:• t-'PCi. '! •',
DDCUMEWT NUMPE
! ':.'•' •!..• 'ILK"! L'STE :
N'.i^BEF 0" PAGE
r i"!".1..!'-*!:;.:,1"," TiT-
i-Xr: (•!, [.&&1 f'OjjJ Wci-iC- CC'TPpl j o
"rer c'.s I'C5;.1? ••tr-ii*''it of W-ter Rc-ec-u
LJ. E;. E-'H Re::io,'i VI Site? Files
Si. >-€ t c: yy Df;- t?r ir . >-,at J. ovi
pi.. '.'. Sri'i'. '.:"'! H? '. :\i" J ;'Uri ••.' i". :: t S Ci 1 t (S f~ .'. MtV
Etr-e*\ fe-tiy ].>€••> t fcffiij rieti i on fc'r Sheridan
I.-i Hp;ir'-:' 1 iinr.'i'^e site
DO^UKEi-JT NUMBER:
IX if. !..ir':L'rv'T DfrrE:
fJL^.p^?? Qr PP5ES,
AUTHOR i
RECIPIENT:
DCCL'^IMT TYPE:
DCCUXEKT TITLE:
Lerry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enfoi'cejnfcrit Sect ion
U.S. EPtt ReQiun VI
U.S. EPfi Reiji'-'H VI Site? Filt?r>
t.'O r-c> •'; (•:• yy Det errn i ni^t i on
Pot*?''it ial Hazardous Waste Site Final
5t ratfr^y Dt>tern-, iriftt j.on for Sheridan
Dis-fi'-'ssl Sersice site
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TX'D
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER Of-' PAGES;
AUTHf.ifv:
COM-'AN"! /Hf-jENC 1 :
K::e:iP:-EKT:
DOCUMENT TtPE:
DLCL'MEUT TITLE:
09/:•<• c '.' r 're ei up to t h i £ d;jt2-
ng
CDrUMer-T NUM&FP:
}:'fir:ut'ij:NT DATE:
CDi'lr'n','1! /Hu.uivC V
RECIPIEfJT:
TITLE
B
07/1L/BZ
058
A.1 pnc'Tist J. N&urt on, Jjm Tf.ts.ley «*no A.
Chriss. Si'fiiple? Per'sonnel
U. S. EPA Reyjon V]
Linda Kro^enbergev, West Coast Technical
£• >•• ce
Tr-sf^ic Re;.r-.^ts
Vt*t jfin'r C'rys-i: c Traffjc. RepcTt P?C:^.E?\ ?••: U)
I ... l-'ii'-ib - Fclc.'il (J:'1 i\o. Fci£70 - FJ-V".'7« '. I>
f,".:.. 73 - Fi:.'l'7H <'H> tv'o, Mf"0i.)ti) - KF P7OO,
Chc>in "'f CujVC'Oy forms No, 6— .li..'/ii?.' - t»-1 £'*•,•*';
a n c1 «-11 a c n e d a i r t« i 11 E
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
D:Jri:t1L:NT LATE:
NUMBER Or PAGES;
nUThOf;:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT;
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
003
Mei-ton CdJoion, Lostricv Supervisor
Texas Lepar4;merit of Water Rssources
Chief of Apprc.pr iflte Dec t ion, Erifortrement
ftr>d Field Operation?, Division
Memorandum
EnfC'rcrernfnt report concerning Sheridan
Di'-poi-al Service, P«rrnit Nri. 39'.")07
-------
SITE NflMEr
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FI K'ftL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofc.c'131-347
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DQCUI'.LfjT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES
UUTKOR:
CQniPH.'o'. 'AGENCY :
KLC: rf-'JEK'T :
DOCUMENT TITLE:
10
l£/07/£}3
OtS
tortion J'uncan, FI" Hyc/rcO oq i st
E c o i o r: y e. E n v i r o n m e n - , I n c.
Dave Peters, Chief, Hazardous Wr»Ete
Section, U.S. EPfl P.~gion VI
Mptnor c\t icj 'j.rn e nc M t f>.che-o Re- port s
Drilling «ni Sarnpiing Inspection .~epo»*i- •.ror-
Bher i<. ?n I13 sp-.-isa j £•=•»•• v3 re H j t €? conducl e~'
from July 1."- t-i'--:ni:h Ju?> c'd1, 1 -?S3
DOCUMErJT r.;Uf-:&i::
I'OfaJr-iFm I>'-TtV:
NUMBER Or PHCJE
1 1
0 i 6
I.'rtvt/ Pev^vn, Cropv, Hc<^t»rdc".i£ Wcj-1! c? &ecrt ; on
U. E. EPn ,^€igion VI
Tx-stit Nc-tt, Cfaef^ Enforcement section. U. fc.
t'C'R RtfRi'-n VI
?''it.':ri':T r-i iO'.;ri ancJ P!iiacht?o f-'iri^." yt 3 rf- / Datft
RW.-J'.: 1 1 -- of -">i)", nrounc i-ji-1 or , so1!, rave*
tv--.\or' ««''•'::• r 3 vfci- ;..t-:;j j iivit'fiv c->-i£ .' > -s >::•??
DOCUMENT NU,\£ER:
J)fiC.U;«inN7 DATE:
NUMBER OF PflSES :
tti.lTHr.Rr
COr-,PH.\'Y /AGENCY :
PDCUI1EW7 TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
Russell Bart]PV, Chief, Operations Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Larry Wrignt, Chief, S'uperfunc Enforcernent
Sectic-n, U.S. EPA Reijicn VI
Memorandum anc! Att**chmcvnt£•
The FIT report for drillinc) conducted for-
th?.' T(->-£.5-. ':c-p."2rtio&nt of U'i-tijr RtfSjourcrej: at
the Sher.\c..ctri Disposal Service site
-------
SITE NAME:
£>ITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£lf7
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
Dt.iCUMh.KT DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
ft! IT HDP:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TVC-EI
Doc:uMF-:rjT TITLE:
13
007
Lr»rry B. Felocerr.p, Cha: rriisr;
Sheridan bite Steering Cornrni tte?e
Chsrles E. Ne-rnjr, Executive- Di vector-, Texe.s
Depart rnE?r'it of Water Resources
Corrpi-t'Ondfe-rics-- end Attachments
Re-:'.' Rt-.nkir,g of the? Sheridan Dispose)
5er»'3t.& <=iic-:'; c»»'i:J, interest by the PRP' e to
.initiate.- f\ a rive--. L i g?t i ve study of the SII.P
i ri.T ." i..d : ni- the dfr'/e ? c proeiil; of £«. set irf act o»--;'
c'o-inre- p 1 .-v,'i
DOCUMENT :,i..'Mi-:2i: :
r.'UMBEP 0:-- PAGES:
ntJT|-;t
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FIN-flL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OE>£13£:1A7
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DDCUMrlK" DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
RECIPIENT:
DLil.L'hlEtMT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
16
11/05/fit
010
Robert U. Lee, 5olies' Waste C.-omp] i
Enforcement
Texas Department of Water Resource's
U.S. EPn Region VI Site Files
Metiiorarickuri and Attachments
Sheridan Disposal Services;, Inc. lagoon
£l'.'.c'g€' f»£r-es-sment ; So] iti w»ste rtpj stret
No. 3?.:>07
NUMBER 0.-
O'.IFHD' :
DOCUMENT
j1/OC/BA
Ov .1
Hnr. McCI'i n3 fry
Te^ae Depart'i:r»n': of Water Resources
U.S. Ef-'A Re-y/on VI Eo.te Files
Record of Communications
F'.e-.1: Cor vts-r &t"t 3 on watfi Gre?p McCcbe
ronre.--.-ii ng PCE-. contaru net ior. at rhc;
•/.»-. r>
DOCUMENT NUMBER
DLiC'tJMr.MT D.-nT:
NUMBER H-- P'PGES
DOCUMENT TYPE :
16
03/11/35
OSS
Eryfer, W. Daxor,, P. E. , Chxe~, Solid lv«nste
ttnd Spill Response Section
Texas Department, of Water Resources
i_?trry 3. Ffldc?n-p, Chairman, Sheridan C»ii ^
Steering Committee, fcsker & Botts
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Clot-tire of the Phc-ridsri Disposal
Service site; Obtaining of the TSCA permit
prior to the actual ctart of on-nite
constr uct i on activ i tiOH
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NJKSER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofci'lSt'lAV
DOL'JMENT
i.>(.'f:.uhE:N7 DATE- :
NUMBER OF PAGES;
RECIPIENT:
).Of L J"':I.Vr TVPE:
DOCUMENT TIT,_E
19
00
Kf»rthe Mc:»- ee, Ir, jef, f.uper furro Con p" is nee
Sect ion
1 1. S. EPA Region V]
L.«fi-/ Fel dcarrp, Cn sir van, Sheride.n Dispos
Corr no t ter- (Ehev idc-.r- E;.te Bteer-ang
Cofiim^ tec >
Cc't rer. p:"-iC3£:'fic.-e
Re? : Technice5! lan'.ie-.. Tn?t will re-quire /i
f" if i: [ ' '1 ' r'i ?r (r tj CC- 'i' C ' I* fi V '.! r' 1' t"' r.1 r t'l ^ D 0 1' 3 cV "t J O t'l C
rc-.-c; /. .-'cJ ; ri^ c 1 o ;= • ! i" i-; of the Ine^iclsn Disposs
!• .1' I'".:.::" r--iTi:r
• '•'.'•'''Bfi.f'\ ~'r PAGES;
f.f •'•',£. ;M-I , A-L.rir-.'C ; :
I*!'": i:^-NT TITLFT:
G)-c?y Mcfrvbe:-, Reirc-c.' •• al Project hers? per-,
Si/.p^rf 'i'-iCj Con pi •• -.ncre? Sect ion
Li. S. FPf-i r.V Li •"•''•' v^
".i » c • £ L n g i rier r J n c
.iric'i'-.v a«.-E-fjS5:''r.ent of tne
c^cJc.J : t ioni< 1 inforr.iat ion and sampling
i' •. •! the? f.-h£-T idc^n D .\5ipofoc-l t-trvice r:
l-iCNT NUMBER!
£1
NUMPER OF PACES i
Pi 17 HP R :
C^.P^Ti/KGEV/Vs
Hr.CJPlEf.'T:
uNT TYPE:
l^r.T TITLE:
004
Keith Bradley, FJ7 Rerjiona] Project OffJc-f-r
U. S. EPA Roy ion VI
Earths M. McKeo, Chi&f, Super fund
Compliance Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Samp] i nij In=psction Report
F-"IT report rt/cj Ar-ding HN-i results ana Otln
5»i te
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER,'
J'H"i(,UMrNT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES!
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
cir.
OS/01/65
057
Perm is L. Cr>puvo, C. E. P. .. Feroor Pr
Manager
Resource Engineering, Inc.
Greg MrC«be, Superfunc Enforcement
Compliance Section, U.S. EPrt Region
C o •'• r e » p o n d e n c e a n c A 1 1 a c h o d R s> p o r t
R £•-• t •(."• c i p 3. t- £r o f the C'Uet tfie ?ri«?r i
Disposal £'/.T~ v a '.•£? site
ject
VI
DOCUMENT NUMBER
T DrtTE:
OP PACEii
HI.HKOR:
TO! iPnNY/AGENCY :
Jofet-' G. Rodr s p upr
•J. S. EPA Reg ion VI
L'. L. «."»"• A fvepion Vj 5:tt? Fiie-s
B i t e I n s p e c: t i o r. Report
"V...&1.' •:•>' tht- £ .11 c- i n?-f;er. t i on re-port for
Sneridan Disposal S&rvice site, near the
?: PC, 2 oil f?iver
DOCUMENT NUMBER
I.jOC.U:iEW7 DATE:
f-.UMBER OF rflSES
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Di:CUhn,'7 TITLE:
OS/07/85
00£'
Gregory D. McCc»b&, Super-fund Compliance
Sect ion
U. S. EPA Rep ion VI
Dennis Caputo, Senior Project Manager,
Rfcsoui- ce Erigifisffring
Cor respondence
Cornrrifnts on th& ree\'cO uat ion of prel j'nu nc t y
a s c e s s m e n t o n a d d111ona 1 in forma 11on and
r.:. mpj j nt4 for thfe1 Sfier i dv-n D.. £pi:«~.c
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
F1 NAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0&c'13
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
r.iOCUKLN'7 DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ft'JThDf- :
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOfL'MENT TITLE:
06/£0/85
00£
Robert G. Forrest, Chief, Office- of DuaJity
Assurance
U. S. EPA Rep ion VI
Martha McKee, Chief, Si.iperfi.ind Compliance
Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Memorandum
Re: Conditional approval of the duality
Ass'irancf Project Plan for Sheridan
I'\:'-'-•<:• '-ri 3 ^ei-\ico site
DOCUMENT NUME-'EP
r/OCUhiE'JT D3TE:
r DUMBER OF PAGES;
RECIPIENT:
r.-f-CL:r--.Er-JT T'.PE:
l'r.ir.L)r.,F.'JT TJ'FLE:
Of;/30/85
Oc'l
Bt j: f f Ent^
Renource Engineering, Inc. for the Sheridan
£ ? r e f.t ei-.-r i nt' Cornm:. 11 e-e-
U.S. EPH Region VI Site Files / Texas
Pe-part fufnt of Wat Hf'-i[,'eoloy j r Invest i get ion p]^ri •"•'•:• r-
vne Sheridan Disposal Service Field
Hr.-t i vj t j us
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
JinCUMFNT E'ftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
r.'Of.UMETK'T TITLE
i.: i
09/13/B5
038
Deu n in L. C c- p u -t o, C. E. P. , T. e- n \ o r P r- c j e c t
Mana.ger
Resource? Enpirieeri.nc;, Inc.
6rea McCebe, Superfund Enforc^msnt
Cornp] is net? Section, U.S. EPfi Region VI
Correspondence and Attached Report
Tht? fiampJing and fins3y«:i& Ple~n for
In/e.-;t i gat ions o4" Clari£.tfc»i a'-ea ^t the Shet idan
Disposal Service site located near'
h'*?rn|: £,i c-ar.1, TX
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
fcDN 1N15T RAT ] Vt£ RECCRD I NL>E X
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£.£13c']47
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DDCUMEN'r DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(•'•lUTKGF-;:
UJMPAN". /A&E.NCY:
RECIPIENT:
DDCUKENf TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITu.K:
£8
09/£0/85
001
fcreg Me/Cabe, Super fund Enforcement trench,
Comp1iance Section
U. S. EPA Reg 3 on VJ
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Filer,
Recore of Communication
Re: Conversation with John Bins of REI,
concer-n3 riiji berre 1 H on—s : t e> cc-r.t s j niny
unl< r.own s ub=,t encc-s
DOCUMENT NLJilBcP
JinCUML'KT DATE:
NUMBEF- OF PAGES
Chi'U'V/N V:
"EC I PIE! NT:
:\.!i u:nf:\T TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£3
Ou 1
&rerj frc/Cabe, Rem&d3£>l Project Manager,
S'ipcif-fi.'.nd Enforcement Section
U. S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EC'P Region VI Site Files
Re-cord of Ccimmi."!iCt:t ior.s
Conversation witn David Eisner, aide to
Conyr-f-.'Hrifi.M'i EIVI-P.no/ r-egai-aing tfi» upcon-o r.y
visit by fl£«ssr. Feldc-amp s,nd Cr-pnuo, to
i.-'.i-iL;reuu r.i n buee-ney't- c>ffjc:-e
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER 0'-v PAGES:
A'J'iHOP:
COMPftNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
UDCUMENT TITLE:
30
10/11/65
003
Greg McC&L-s, Super fund ErcP orcement
Compliance Sectiori
U. E. EPf-l Region VI
Dennis Caputo, C. E. P. , Senior Project
M'-nfcier, P\e«;ourc£? lEnginecring
Correspondence
R(?: EPA's review of the Hydrogeologic
Invest igi?t ii:in Plan for the Sheridan
D'. *-f'C'&a] f-.£?rvicc:- «• 31 e
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£J47
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DLO.lME.NT DATE:
NUMBER 0^ PAGES:
COMPAQ /A&ENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TVPE:
LH.O :M:. rr TJTLE
31
10/24/65
O07
Dennis L. Cspi.it o, C. E.
Re-RC'ur ct? Em; 3 neer 3 ng , J nc .
Greg McCc-be, Super-fund Enforcement
Compliance Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence1 and Attachments
Fe^porif e to Mr. MrrHaliis'c letter of October
11, 1985, regr.--d.ing the Hydv-ogoolog i c
T ri%-'c-':;-c 3 Cjt'l 3 '••>'! PJrin fot 5herjOfr.n DiEpos-eJ
i>nr:'.iMt:f.'7 DATE'
fj.jr^E- C:r PAEv
AUTHOR:
xrr ' f- ; ENT :
DO':urCi\'T TYPE:
' 'r.'f ''.' .;.'fv"" " •' Ti. F.
Tnriinss D. Br-i&t,'?.n, Der;". Fropram Mener-e-r
P'lannino Fesear-c'h C'r-rporct ion
C^-ei, McCrbfc-. U. C. E'Ti rvt-pion VI
C'-irrc~poricence ^ncl Attached Pc-por-;
Irc-fl F'cpc'ft c?!il3tj£-C) "Shtr 3 dc'-n t :r.^':>!.i^.'i
S »•'•• v i r: £• t= Cite, S ? rn p i i n g ? n cJ A n«»1 y s'. s P: 1 ;"> n,
T :.•>:•'i n ' C'r' 5 F
-------
SITE NOME I
SITE NUMBER:
ADM 3. NISTRflT1 VE RECQRD 1NDLX
FI NAIL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13c.'147
DOCUMENT NUMBER
DOriJMt NT DATE :
NUMBER OF-' PPSE5
COMPANY /A&ENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
ClJi'-rWT TITLE:
34
1.1 /CM/85
004
Dennis L. Cst-i.to. C. F£. P., Senior Project
Manager-
Resource? F.nn 3 neer 3 ni:i, Inc.
Larry Rexr-oat, Remedial Project Manager,
Li. 5. EPfi Region V]
Corrf'i'.p C'fi'-.'fince 3nrj Attachments
f-'v: ffs-i r-ndti-nl s to the EPA' E rev.iei.1 of the
[• f>:; i p 11 ft g f- P i -i a 1 y sis P; S n for t n e £ :i t? r a d « n
r 3. rt>c-s-< ] £•«=• v v 3 r.-t.- £-3 i e
J.)f.ifM.!"1i:N'; IlnTrV:
N U N B H R C F P A G? il S :
Jc'f.n I. ;t.r._ ?.i-:-n. c r f':-:.i€C't £" r>g sneer
Fe»o"irc.-e Eng i riser i nq
Lot'r-y Ft/rcr-t.. Rprn=c?:5?. Project Mftn
?: iipcrr •Tu-'id Enf ofeeMpnt Sertio^i. U.S. FPft
J':..•!. LM.: NT TTTi-E:
C. o r re.- :-. 't: :> ' •:: :• *i-~. ~
f'. t? : I.1 •"• \ s 5 •: • \. ' rii r- n t o f c« r i F n d £• n y s r rn £-? n t
ft ^ s fe 3: i: fr.e r. t r" u r 'L n eric a n , i n s u p P "-1 ft of
F!e'riH/ci 3 e 1 Irjvefet i iie>t ion that w«s aorie
DOCUMErJ" NUMBER:
DDC:UI-;::KT I-ATE:
NLIKBER Oh- PAGES:
n:.l-,'KC.'P:
COMPANY /AGENCY:
DOCUMENT TYPE :
DOCUMEr,'" TITLE:
36
.'.3/OC./B5
009
H«>Ty C. Dc'ny, Jr., Hydrog^oloRist
Jacobh Eng irioering Group, Inc.
Larry Re/:ro?v, Rcinedia) Project Manager
U. S. EPA- Region VI
Corresponderice and Attached Report
F;:e: R cJ.-aft of the Site Safety Plan fo
5itf? fie t ivi t .'€.•£ r»+. the Bfit?rid£in Di&posa
Service site, in He.np'-Tl't?*^, TX
-------
SITE: NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
flDMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDftN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXP 0£.c'13c'l'+7
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
nCiCUttDviT DATE:
NUMBER OF PfiGES:
(CjrHDf<:
C CJ '•'* i-' H ' v / / A 5 £ i J I." T :
RI..I. If3 EN" :
DnCLif'-c-NT TtPE:
LDL'iiKCfJT TITLE:
37
31/08/85
035
Larry B. Fe3c:camp, Chai1
Sheridan Site Committee
The Konora.b3 e Mar. Sweeney, Conpre&&man i
Correspondence? and flttached Report
Written an^-we-rs, to questions received from
Cong.-Oa^m^r, Swpe-ne;. ' s office related to the?
Shfe-i it:=-n I'lr-posal Lite
DOCUMENT NUMBER
DCif.l.'Mc.fv'T DATE:
fJU"1S£F OF ^'HGu?
(if ''i hOP:
RECIPIENT:
36
l.cffy Wr i t'i"i\ , Rerueci j «< 3 f-'rojfcct f'Ua.c.c «•••.,
S .. '. p sr-f'.i r -i cJ E n force r,i e n t S e? c 1 1 o n
1.:. T... f£PH "er,: c.n ^ 1
D'-ians Sheridan, Sheridan Disposal Service
Corr es p!-'> 'ne^cfi-
Pe;: fir'. F-''it?-' id-,n' s. ifiLjijiry concr-c-rning
futf-e use or disposal of equipment
f . . T r .? •• • .1 .- '. i s t? d to t r • t.- a t . j:- 1 o re, o , • c ; \ s p o := e
• • r h r- r ar c1 out c '.i t-c "I ? nc tjs
DDC'JiMXT NUMBER
rDCUML'.NT D3TE:
r:jMBER OF PPGES
DOCUMENT TYPE:
J.'OC.UM[r.K'T TITLE:
001
"A af f
U.S. EPfl Ren ion VI
U.S. EPf-1 Rep 3 on VI Bite? F.ijf
List of Meeting fittendeei>
Li&t c-f attendees et Sheridan E:le Mc-et j
held l£/l^-/a5 in Washington, D. C.
-------
SITE NONE:
SITE NUMtTR:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
rn.iUJMtNT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AJ7HOR:
RECIPIENT:
MENT Ti'PE:
j,'0;,ur:£K7 TITLE
40
coir:
Lcvrry D. Wright, F.E. , Chit-f.. S-jperf Line
Enforcement Sect ion
U. E.. Ef-'A Region VI
BOG Kan-'iesseh lager, Cf.ief, Supt-rfur.rf
Enforcement Branch, U. E. EPA Reg: on VI
Trip Report
ivv, rvr.c? Potent, a c.l iy
has
I r-i . si-t :. c: St u.dy sctivitie:
a* the J.f.&r : ds-fi !"•..'•> 5'.'5ff-l Service site
DOCUMENT i.'UMfEF
j-ui-ruf-.n^r DH'FP.
NJMDrR OF PHbZ
f '.I.!': HO =;;
ic/::--: /fir.
01 8
Lf-ir r->' I-:. F€>!ioce'np, Chsirrnsri
cjr-;e,-id?.-i Site Stecri/ig Committee?,
Lot 1 =
D;c'- »'': i't t : riL;t on, Re 13 :• oru\3 f-idnuriist rfU :>r ,
U.S. E-:PM Reg i or. V!
Lc>r r&J-pcTides .re c\»icr. f>tj SfrtiritM-it &
Re: Suggested changes to the newsletter on
the brier 30an Djcpossl Ct-rvice site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
]jn(.:U«i:k!T DATE:
fiUIBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY /P.3ENCY:
DOCUMENT TYPE:":
DOCUMENT TITLFI:
01/02/B6
CIS
Mark J. Le-.r-son, Hyc'rogeologict
Jacobs Enginearing Group, Inc.
Lcirry Rexr-:>;.\,. Env; r-onrnental Scientist,
U.S. EPA Region V!
C'orTfc-rpr.ndencrD end Attachments
Re?: "Region?! office.-" file copies of
orge'm:c.£ pnd 3 not tit'.ni ct; traffic rep-r.rtfe
f-f-'-.m ssniple splits collected «t Sheridan
l>.i i- pc * fee* 1 Service site
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ftUMIWSTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ot.213.tJ 4 7
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUF'-.ENT DnTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
RECIPIENT:
iJT TrPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
01 /le
O'"'l
fc'Sf't t y Wi 1 J : i.imson, Cor:irm.i''i; t y *'**! st i on:;.
Li. S. EPA kericin VI
Dick Whitt ingtor / Fran Pnillips, tJ. S. t.f'n
R&Eji'.-n Vj
R e c o r d o f C o n: m M r 1 1 c a 1 1 o ri r>
Kr-: C. r 3 .' t •:• L?rr-y Feldcernp to d: scrubs EP-'-t
c •::> rr. m •.• r, a t v r t? 1 =• t i u o s see n a r i o
DOCUKEHT
r»rir.; 'M-: t r
NUMBER OF
nUTHOR:
.' I'1 >.!T
L ft r r y &. F-1? ] D r. & in p, C. fi e ? t' rr i» ri
Snsrad^r- ?,i73 St&eri/ir: Committee,
Bot t s
P;c!' Whit t Di^t r-:-i, c;epionr'i f-icr'm t n; 11 r etor,
U. S. KPn F;.e?r~on VI
C. if >• t^r- p'-TicJf?rifre cTir- Pt i ^climent s
Fir- : Upa'-'5. i;-'J E-'fii i- ^ ronnt. n^;.'C.fb used by
Conprtf U! 'iisn C-wG-feney oufi.rip h:.r p>-e?r:!T
coi'if e.-r i-rice ht.'ld un Fehri'^r/ 1 7, .".?^CC
("cn'ifL-rr'j nrj i he Cheriosn Dx«. po&sl Service-
Site in Hemprteaci, TX
Dl.lCiJilL NT PflTE:
NLJMtEr? OF PfiGES:
fitlTHOR:
COMPRKY/AGEMCY:
'NT TYPE
'M'l T3Ti
RichcTd J. Br-ef-r, Envirormie-ital Coordinator
Exxon Chemical ftncjricas
ftntfiony L. Er rtiner, Rc?rr£?c:iel Project
Manager, S'.iperfund Enforcement Section,
!.l. S. fc'Pf-i R-i-Ljion VJ
CorrtJs-pondtjnre ^r-:d PttachMeots
F\o : E >. xon Chem i c rO E corop ] et eel
quest iorinaire concerning the production of
ri.vt r-r ift.1 K n=. ing £, 4, ?-TCP; end i nf or mat : on
regarding t"ie:-i-" wsste disposal practices
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE: NUMBER:
flDMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FIK'fcL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
7XD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
UDLUMENT DiT;E:
NUMBER OF PASES:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
r;nci.'fit:NT TITLE:
46
04/OA/&6
033
L t f-' f f Co n c 1.131 s r11 r»
Plor'inif'ig Resect re h Corpore\t ion
U. S. EPf-! Re-gaon VJ
Draft Report
£hfrncan DiEpc-s?) Services Site Well
Installation and Sediment Sampling
Li'f '..'ML' NT i:>K7f;-?
NUMZ-ER OF PAGES
RECIPIENT:
riEiVT 7JT1.E
Cnerr.ast, Envj.T--c.-•< M. f*.cKe?£-. Chief, 9'ipftrfunc)
Cor.Tjl 3 f.nc-«? Bectac-n, U.S. EC'K F?epion VI
Wernor-andi-irf and ftttechec Report
?•;£•: Air I.TM;- 1 ) np results- fc-f trie 3Ser
Di£?po3i-l Jiervice s^ite
HPI..I.IK11NT
NUKDZR OF PAGES'
COMPPNY/flSENCY:
rx.TClPJEWT:
DOCUME.NT TYPE:
J)0(..IJMENT TITLE:
001
Lerry Rfc»;roct Rem^di^l Project hfr.agt?r anr'
Larry Wright, P. E. , Chief, Super-fund
F1 if or Cfc-iiicJi it Sfi-r-t i on
U.S. EPfi Region VI
U.S. fcT'fl Rc:-yjO!. VI Site Files
Record ef Cowmunics t i on
Re: Conversation with Larry FeJdcamp, of
the Sheridan Sitt? Commit tee concerr.int
pjOEr-Jble j ssurc*nc-e- of an fldrr.inist r-ctt i ve
Order for the Source? Control PI/FS, and the
eil s-r RI/FB
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£,£13c'147
DDCL'MEKT NUMBER:
i; n CLIME: NT DATE:
NUMBER CF PAGES:
P.uTMCJf-1:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE :
'T TITLE:
43
06/OL/et.
001
Ruth L. Irr-fielj, Rerneflj e 1 Projert Mt'.napf.> ,
Superf urid Enforcement Section
U. £. EPA Rc-i|3on VI
Bob Heionessch ledger, Chief, Superfurn"!
Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA Ret1 ion VI
Mew or .-. EKH
Fr-p. ion VJ
Re: A: iec's reft-rrel of it's re?r»:>n=p to
EPA* s 104 (e) Notice Letter, to the Sheridan
L ? t (? Si a-pr i -i ir- T'ornr-i 3 1 1 C?G?
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DfJf;.L!-:L"N'T DnTE:
NUMBER Or PAGES:
A'.iTHDR:
CQMPAN'i/AGENCTV :
RECIPIENT:
rOCLJKEi\'T TYPE:
I-r-lMihtLNT TITLE:
51
Robert W. Sme-ll, Assistant Gerierc»l Co
Bets
Ruth L. Irrc-.frj3, Remedial Project M
Superf unt' Enforcement Section, U.S. EIPA
Region V]
C o >' r e s p -i n d c-? n t: t?
Re: Be-/! r ' E referra] of thesr re-Kponiie to
EPA' s 104 (e) Notice Letter, to the SheridJi
f.-> 3 1 (-• Si &•£-:•)• 3 ny Co HIM 1 1 1 ec?
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE. NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINfiL
SHERI DON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OG£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
J.«.IC..UML:NT DftTt:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
CDMP'fiN'Y/ AGENCY :
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
001
Frederic T. Radloff. Vice President,
Eric ine»enng
South Coast Term ana 3, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superf und Enforcement S&ct ion, LI. £. E^'fl
Region VI
Corrers pondence
South Coast Terminal referral of the:.xr
retpon=.e to EPA'E ]0*f(e) U'oticrev Letter, t>.>
the- S!-,eridrr, Site S'. t?e"- i ng Committee
DOCUMENT NJr-l3E
r!UMF-:E» OF PAGES
flUTHCJK:
RECIPIEfJT:
DOCUMEr.'T TYPE:
Ob/30/SL
00 3
J. E. Fil linger, iiupervj. &or, Group ftccident
Prevent icn ?>• Occup«»t ions! Health Stsff
f-irn:cc' N?t J onf> ] 5>.ipp3y Coi.^pc-riy
fillyr M. D?v-ar:, Director, Hazardous Waste
•*1r-n-i.i«?:!ifri'iir DJ va H 3 on, U.E. E.Pfl Region VI
Cor r^e? - ponde nee
Fa/: frrr-:. orn response tci FP.V ?: Notice
Letter request for inforrnst ion regarding
it't diepoEc*! activities «=it the Sheridan
Disposal Service site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PCO.ir'if.NT DftTE i
NUMBER OF PflGES:
fi'JTHDR:
COr'.PONY/flGENCY:
RE'CIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
JjfjCiLU'.EN'f TITLE:
001
Peter R. McCormacI'., fittorney
Cc'Tiieron Iron Worlds, Inc.
Ruth L. Izr«eli, Rfernedial Project Officer,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPP
Rfcrjion VI
C o r r & -£ p o n d e t«.: r
T-'.tii Ceimeron's Iron Works referral of tncj
response to EPfi's 104(e) Notice Letter,
w jt hcn.it admission of liability, to the
Sheridan Site Stc-ering Committee
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL. SERVICE
7XD 06£JS£J47
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE!:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ftiirt-ifiFi:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
WiUPJENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
I.'Oa-MiYNT TJ~LE:
07/OiE/frt
GO 1
fcera j ri: n~ 5art>e", Officer Mc-ne-nie-r
Eltex Chemical £ Supply Company
Ruth L. 3rraelj, Fal of the EDtex response' to the
Sl'ie-r ician Site Steering Committee for
f.vi<-.t.,.f.vs t •: L'Pt"" £.- out.'fiv i C'r: regarding
d'li-pos:'1. act i\ i t ie~ at tne «site
rJUMBcr" or
AJTr-'HPr
TITLE
07/0 £•/£'.£.
C'C'i
Nc??s:-r, Pi. Hmas-rer, Vice? Pre= : dent
Mrjm.: :7c-'::t i!f i nn
Ctt.-iC' F :;".'? t-'fie-fcl Corr.pf*riy
Pi.-th L. Izoaeli, Rene-dial Pro;ect
Euper f'.mo Enf or^ernent fce-c.1 j'_in, L1. £. EPr-i
Region VI
C. or r c>;- p:'i-idfrrice
Re: Oteco's respor.se to EPA'r» request for
in•formst ion that is now being handled by
the Sheridan Site Steering Committee
DOCUMENT NUMBER :
DOCUXL / r-flTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
fiUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMuNT TYPE:
r'(.if:Uf--,EN'T TITLE
07/05/Sf.
H. W. Pfenning, Vice President,
f')?>nuf ac:t ur ing
Mev-i r.'hem Company
F?nth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Mananer,
Jr'ufsc f unri Enf orcemf.-nt Secticin, U.S. EPA
Reigiofi VI
C!' o r r e & p o n a e n c s
Merichern's response to EPA' s request for
information regarding hazardous waste-
c:'Jspo&£<3 at the Sher i ti=-.n Disposal Eervace
-------
SITE NAME:
SI TFT NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£152147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOt.UK'flNT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY /A&ENCV:
RECIPiflNT:
nr.iOi.iKEKT TVf'E:
DGCUI-ir-.NT TITLE:
58
07'KVfcfc
009
Allyn M. Dsv3£, DJrector Hazardous W^ste
Management
l«. £.. E>'A Region Vj
Attached List of Addressee's
Corrrsponoence and Art aehrnent s
Re>: lO^(e-) Notice Letts?" that was sent to
2:£teo c5icidre'f.5.f?s' s, iiif orrn? ng thtern of
c-o«-£ ;b". e liah.iiity c-it, a waste gensr'ator c-t
•the Bhe:>r-; dc-fi PrEpc-sf*] E-prvice site
l:0!ll.'''.EN"r D'VFF:
fJUMPE,1' OF PAGER
r>r.f.i.jr-irf'T T^-'Fr
rjc:i:'•:"• JT "IT:..:?:
-•• ,
0 f f 3 ce o f
07 /;<';/B6,
'"•Or.1
T h c-iiie- r; A . F-. 3 v . 1 3 > -fr , A v -i c-i
Ganerel Couri-el
fs'L I no '.!^: t r 3 &j; . I Y-IC: .
Ruth L. I2r-e-ie.li, Fie rnr-dial Projecv Officer,
f ijp»r -f i. ncJ Enf or-c-ernent Section. U. I-.. EPA
r-.- ion V;
C" or ren ponciF-rice
»3: ML Iri'j!.i-.-4;r- ie:s resD'-mse to RPFS' s
request for inf c-nnat ion concerns ••![} any
harardous waste dispose of et the Sheridan
D :. r.. p'r. s-t* 1 Ber v ice n i 1 1-
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DDL-UKF/rn DHTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
I >f in WENT TYPE:
60
07/I A/66
001
I). P. Whitaker, President
N u t r >.:' F:' r- o d L t c 15 C o r p o r a t i o i'i
F-'uth L. Israeli, Super fund Enf orcernerit
Section. U.S. LPfl Region VI
C c • r r e H p on c1 e n c (-:•
Nutro Products Corporation response to
EPA's request for information regardsng
possible disposal artivities at -che
f-'hc-r i clan Dinpos-eil r-e»v'vice S3tc-r
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0&£J3£)47
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUML'KT DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
RhC IPiE-.NT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
D;_V. i.H'iilNT TITLE:
Gl
07/1^/ftt.
001
Nancy A. Roberts, General Attorney, Law
Depart rnent
Unjon Pa::: fie Railroad Company
Ruth L.. Israeli, Remedial Project Manag
Super fund Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Co i-r (? = po no t? nee
Union P: c f:c response, on behalf of
M ' s --- 01 : r- 1 Ps- -. i "• i - Fr- i 1 road , t o EPA ' s 1 C"+
N' . ' t .i r. e 1. e c t c-? r . r «? i;- a r o i n p p c i r: j;. i b 1 c? f 1 1 , ^ a r
wasjte dispos:'! tvy Missouri Pacific Rni 1
,- 1 J,-hf- ?!??:. rjts
er,
DOCUMENT r.;Uiii;
rril.UMEfs'T DATE
NUMPiEP C-- PAG
TO- r> i"
TITLE:
07/14/BG
'I'01
Den C. "'1c Di-i-if. 3 o, Vice President - Lerjsl1
A t\ d ::• f i;.:. n - C 1 a y t o n
Ru\ f' L. j rt'c-fc .' 3 , Fxe-roecJ: «J 3 P f i. •; c-. t: \ N:-uir-.ijc.T .
Si.i^e.-rrund Enforcero-snt Section, U.'i. EPA
R-:-[• j on » J
Co*' re.-: po '-de •'«.':'?
Anderson-ClctytCTI referral of their response?
to EPA's request for i r,format ion concerrang
possible wsstcr disposal activity, to the
Sheridan Site Steering Conmjttee
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE :
NUMEES Or PAGES:
COMPANY /H5Ei4CV:
RFCJPJtNT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
PiiK.UMELNT TITLE:
£3
07/15/86
00 .1
r R.
Buenz, Executive Vice? President
Ch&fiucai Exchange? Industries, Inc.
Futh L. Irr-^e'i, Re-nif.->d i B 1 Prc.ject Me^narjD
Supr-rf i.md Enf orcerie.'it Jjf-ct ion, U.S. BIPH
Fr-y .1 or, V.I
C o r' r e 5 p o n d e n c e
CX ]'£• res. pont>e to EPr;' s ret^uest for
infovr'.at ion r£>g?rdincj possible hararcious
»-.'!:;;:i e girnerc'tea at the? Shenoan Djsp-isi-1
Service site
-------
SITE NftME:
.SITE NUME-'ER:
ftDMINISTRPTIVE RECORD INDEX
FIN3L
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£::..3ai47
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT Dft'fE:
NUMBER OF POSES;
ft'JfHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
07/jf,/S£
OOc!
Df'S'id J. Stone', fnt t orne-y and fits irtant
Secretary
HuLpes Too) Cornpftf.y
F^i.ivh L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enfor;:ernc-nt E-'ranch, U.S. f:"Pft
Region VI
Corresponderic*-1
Hi.iph{?%-C'rc"C'r/Hut her Tool r j \'i s-ion t-esTi'.'.nse
to EPfl"a ra^MSst for informat ion regarding
;>•': -jhOe- w••«>*£• t-t-i'crste-d M t !'ie She-r
s.ito, i.'/ the- fiff:'ii» r.1 .'i M. D .. vie, D i (•*••.: t or, H?r,«rdous W«*?;t p
f.AnsLt'inic-nl: D:\isiC'ti, U. E. EPA) Ret.:-1 'r'n V:
d '.'f'-rei; f; oncie nee
Hi ) ant ic— K'i c-hf ieio' s authorization for the
£ri£-:-idan Site Committee to provide EPtt wii:h
<:,ny : nformat ion neecJed r-egcrcjj.ng haserdOMS
waste generated at the site, by their
company
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DPTF:
NUMBER OF PflGES;
riLlTI-IOR:
RE C I Pi EN"':
L'CCUhD.T TVPE:
DCJCUMEr.'T TITLE
66
07/IB/66
00£
Bruce- Lee J'ernjgan, M^n^r-er, CERCL.O
fic:t i v it aes
E-ir-ou'ni ng - Ferris: Industries
Ruth L. I;:ras":i, Rsrnsdial Project
puperf'.tnri Enforcement i":re r r- e £ p o r i cl & n c c
Re: Browning - Ferris Industries respovisr
to EPfi5 s request for i nf ornicvt J ori rep^rciitit:
n-~it; c: i ^ ^ c H ^ r- r-..-.c ,:•- ^ 7) r- ^ i v ' 1 4- i ci ^- :* 4- 4- ^ ^
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDAN DISPOSOL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£J47
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
JnjajMEN'T DATE:
•NUMBER CJF PAGFSi
RECIPIENT:
i''E.\'T TVPE:
IJCCJMI ?•!!' TITLE
67
07/36/66
001
R=-3ph W. Johnson, Vic-e President,
Ens i ronroent a 1 Af f a i rs
Di x ..e f."hemi cc-1 Cornp£• riy
R'lth L. Izraoii, Remedial Project Manager,
Super funa Enf orcernent Section, Li. .9. LPA
Region VI
Cor reT-'^pC'riderice
Dixie Cnernic:?! Company's response to EP'A1 v-
reqi.'t = t for- in*" orr-u t i O'.'i resg^rcang
c i:; p-<•--.--1 activity st the Sheridan
DOCUMENT rj;.i'^j:-:-F !
;:.ti.;:ij"i:LNT ::^,TE:
NL'MBEP OF PAGES!
(;UTr!OR;
COn"'^'- 1'/ I'-iC-E. 4CY :
DDTUMilf'T TYPE
07/il/Cfc
001
F' ;-• r,i«j «> P h 3 ] 3 i p s., A s t; s t & n t F-. e g a o r a 1 C o u ri« e
U. C. EPn Re.5 ion VI
Lr o n d P n c e
Enterprise Transports t ion rt-Eponst* to EPP,'s
104(e) Notice Better requesting i r f orrna!: ion
regarding ET's disp'-jSo] octovitie-: a i. the
SII'S tile. Their response will be handled
f%, •(->-, r-. r- i •»• r.- •- ,-.r,-,r- •, J- •!• r>ci
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMiNJSTRATJVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofc£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PDCUMuNT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
Of'^'HrJ'i / AbENCY :
DOCUMENT TYPE :
TITLE:
70
07/21/BC
002
Robert J. ftbr
U S X C o r p o r a t 1 o n
Ruth L. Irreeli, Suoerfurici Er.f o
Br-ar.cth, J. S. EPA Regiofi VI
Attorney
USX D:T poret ion pr-rt ici pst ic'«ri in the-
Re«>pon~ e Act i v ?.t ie?= that «r--e in proces
1 1 ID Sher i OCH n I1 3 r. potc" i £r. rv 3 ce s 3 1 &, ne
Hempstead. T.X
E-OCUN£rn Wi J. 1 ; ems
Gil F i B 3 d Rr-nt c> 1 St?v v i ce Corn jan y
R'.'t h L. JsvciCJJ, Rttfiied'-' c-1 Pro.jer.-t Mc:ni-v
S '." ps -fund Erifo^ctrfiier t Branch, U.f.. EPA
F-'f •[; j CT'I VJ
0:3 Fr3e-3.d Rcntrl Service Co. , res.pori:-:.e t
E.-'iV s req-ie-31. for inf ori.v-" i '.j
di'.>pci£-sl activities at the
D i s pose 1 Service site
DODJKENT r.'JMPER;
Di-iCUMLK'T DATIT:
NUMBER OF PfiSZSi
ftlJTI-IOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
r'DLiiMIlN'f TITLE:
7r:
oc- 1
Melinde 5. Will isms, Legal ftcE-istent
Champ i on I rt ernat i ona 1 Corporat i on
RutN L. J::r .-rc-1 i, Re-rntscia1 Project M*M«r
Superf'it-d Ent'orcemcnt Branch, U.S. EPA
Rf. L- ?T-»' V3
Corres pondencre
The i rif or met ion request F.-CJ through the
104 ve) Notice Letter by EPP. regard inr-
f " ! i (? rii po o r i 1 n 1 1 r n e? 1 1 c.i n s 1 C o r p . d 3 E p o s- e ]
activities at th= Sheridan site
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FI NflL
SHERIDRN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofc£J3c:J47
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
P.UTHOR:
73
&EMC Y:
RECIPIENT:
T'Of UMfNT TVP'E :
DGCUrl:;r.T TITLE:
07 /£
00 1
M. M. Skegas. Jr., Technics.'1 Msnaptr
Env i ronrnent a. 1 ftf f a i rs
D i a f n c - r , d S h => rn rock
pi.'.th L. Israels, Remedial Project
Super fu no £nf orce-rnerit Section, U.S.
Region VI
Rt? : Di^rrond Sl'i^rrirocP' • €?q i.i C"':t f-ir 3 nf orro^t J ori T-eyarriann dispose
c«c\ i v 1 1-/ ft tu.o Slier ' dan Dispos?! Serv\ce-
9. .-'to tiu'j.r he?mpr.t fr«c:,, TX
DDT'Jr.ENT TYPE:
Wiii..--1HNT TITLE
O'I'ti
F(i] o\:rri-.p,
cO riiic*ri
c-
E-«>i-er f. Potts
f'l.r'. h i... ]..!•<•>?.'] 3 ., f'V?Mt'd 5 t' i f'f- lijC'C t f'".e-fpar C- .
Si.'perfurid Enf c-rcpfnent Sc-ction, U.S. EPn
ft'j^JC'ri VJ
Involvement of tht- PR?-1' s listf-i-d in
fittachrnent fi, in RI/FS process ; and the?
c.crrif:!3 tl ee' s hopes that Ef'O will invite-
private par4- ' e? to undertake the dpaign
imp.lfriK-.-nt a', ioi i of the remedy
DOCUMEW" NUMBER:
LUCLirlllfrr DnTf.:
N'UMBZR OF PflaEE:
niJTHOR:
CC3MPA\ i / H'3L-.r JCY ;
TITLE:
00 1
A] c->. S. Kt-vr ] in
S n e 1 1 Oil C •::• ' i p a n y
Ri.i-:h L. ]rra*?jj,
S'.iperf and Enf or corn
F1 ?i;j.on V]
/mec': a) P'r eject Kana
s nt Br^ncn, L1. 3. EPO
1j=. I rrac-1 i's agreement to provide? She]]
Oil Company into an *'-d 11 i coal two ueei-?
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMJNISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£>£J3£J47
DDCUMFNT NUMBER:
1.IOU.H1EN7 DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
CCJMPAuY/ AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
POCUKdU'T TYPL":
DOCUMENT TITLE:
76
00 1
Stephen P.. Hat ridge, Attorney
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation
(Trans, co)
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
S'.iDe-rf I.TICJ En for cement French, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Cor r &•*: p rina e nee
Tra.nsco' £ willingness to part icipste in th
Rl/FE process.; and thett they're present jy
r?-"1; ic: i ;:•?••; it -i ^ uith Lhe Site Cornuittee fi'V-
l-"'i??r- 2 dan
-iE^JT NUMBER:
lUlfli.'l-.EUT DATE.:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
WJCUMCNT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
77
07/£:."./£.iC-
001
Tr,.:.i:-fie*£ F. Hi-rr 3 n-C'ti, Senior C
Conns? el
P. F. Coo'drich Ccimpany
Rutf. L. I^v.^-rrli, Romeci 131 Project Mariager,
Super'P'un.J Enf Circiffmsnt E<,'c«nch, U.S. EPA
Rt-gi.-.n VI
C o r r 11- p •:.• n d e r i c e
Re: B. F. Goodrich's involvement as a
h {•.?£.»•• do us waste? cont»-: butor at the? E-herican
Disposal Service site
DQCUKZfNT NUMBER
DtJCU.it-.tr-.r-s'T PATE :
NU^BEr? OF PAGES
filJTHCR:
78
COMPAQ
DOCUMENT TYPE:
rrjL'UHL'.NT TITLE:
00 1
W. F. McGuire, Manager, Environmental
Pr ot feet i on Depart merit
The Light Company / Houston Lighting &
Power
Ruth L . Israeli, Super fund Enf'orcc?rnent
Branch, b. S. EPA Region VI
C o r r e
-------
SITE NftME:
SITE NUMBER:
flPMlNlSTRflTlVE RiLCC'RD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXJ) Ofc,£13c~:147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DQU.ir'iL'K'T DATE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
fit IT HOP:
73
TIT,_E
OOc.1
Ph .• i ] j. p J. Bs>i ernsn, Corporate Dire-dor,
E r i v i r .:• n m e n t a 1 ft s s u r r> r i c e
The I. u D>" i r o ) Corporation
Frith L. Izraeli, Remedial Project
E M per f un;j EInf circernent Branch, U.S. EPfc
Region V7
C C'r »• f?'ti poric e nee
Re: Li.tbr i rol ' £• response to EPA' s request
for : nTi:.rni5l: 3 on r t- g a >• c1 3 ri y potEJtjlc* cij tpo
scvivitaes at the: S?u-:
se J1
DOCLIMEfJT NiJMc
:-f:r: :.!'••?? MT D&TE
NUMBER 0^ PftS
80
DGCJMliNT TITLE
<.),/c
083
R. M.
Th-.
R.-ch
Eupe
Rogi
C :-.»•)•
The
EPA
the
Helcir j cine-, Kc-nac-er C-ii€?im r.f< 1
r >-• n rn e n t 3' f-'1 r o t e? c t i o n
&oc'dyf?r.) T j re i Rubber Co
L.. i^r ?el.i. PcTiic-.-u i c< 1 Pr ;i.;
r'id E nf •:•)•;. i?inent E-^rarirh,
on VI
fc-sr oi.cjc---ift-e end ftttachmerits
Goodyear Tire A Rubber Cornpany
•itta] '"'f inf CT-nirit ion requertec! by thr-
regarding GT&R's disposal activities at
Ehenc'e^r.- Di£.po-:«nj Gervj'cre Eite-
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT Dr";Tf£:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
fiUTHDR:
COMPANY.-r-iGEfJCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Injf.HI'-.L.N-T TITLE:
81
07/£3/B6
041
Caro; Holland, flttorney
Chevron U. S. ft. , Inc.
Ruth L. 1 rrc'«e] i , R'»roe-dia] Prciject
Super fund Enforcement Branch, U. £3.
R(T P i C'n V]
CorressponcJence ana ftttachments
ChC'\-rcin' E respc-rise to EPft' ?: reques'
information regarding disposal ac:t
bv l-.'c rrc-r. P'et r c.) &uiii Coinp-'ny, on-? •:•'
EPft
ties
v H
-------
SITE NflME:
BITE NUMBER:
flDMJNISTROTJVE RECORD INDEX
FINfiL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMEhJT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
fit IT HO R:
C:(.iMPr-iryne. Envi r-orirnevit al Coord J rie.t or
E.I. Du::'ont De-rJernours ^ Company
Ri'tr. L.. 1 Ltaivli ., f.'«-riioi.': e 1 f'ro.j'e'C-t M&rir»per,.
Super fund Enforcerne?nt Branch, U.S. EPfl
I\'(.M ion V."
Correspor-aefiCts frrJ fit tachnn-'ntr.
Re: Du^'ont ' fc re-i-pc-'r-t?-:. to LPft's request for
x .'i f o r rii ? v i o n t - e c_ A r u i n g p :> -5'.:- i b 1 e a c t i v 11 y x<';
the Gheriuan DiE.pop.8l Bervjce site
DOCUMENT DftTE:
fJL'MDER OF PP.GE
ftUTHQK:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
I'fjrUNtrv'T TITLE
07/£A/B6
001
Bpenc-er J. Nunley, Ai-r.-is-terit General
Courts* el
Mo bay Corpore»t ion
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super f 1.1 nd Enf C'tT&MSYit Branch, U. £. EPfl
ReGion VI
C c« r r c 5 p o n d t? n c c-t :• s i i 31£ at thfr £ht:-i-: dcvri 1>3 spott^) bf-r-s-jc
site
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCV:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
WjUifibNT TITLE:
85
001
£. Platrer, P'reeident
Platser Shipyard. Inc.
Ruth L. 3:raeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super^und Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence-
Rt: tlr. P'lc4t;:er'E reEponse to EPA' s
reqi'.ent for inforwation regarding thai r
difpofi?] Prijvities et the Sheridan
UiSfT'OS?! Service r 3 1 e
DOCUKE-'-iT MUMFZR:
DLT.i.iKtINT
r.'i;r'B£:R CF
'-.rNT TYPE:
Er.'T T:TL.E:
Ruth L. 3zr«e03, Kerned i el Project
J-upe-.-'f unc: Enforceriient Section
U.S. f:F''H F\'t-y i' on V3
L?rry F-:. Ft-r-ldc-aMp, Chairman, Sheridan Site
-.'. c->:-f 3 r:g r:'--ro"i: tj: c-». r-.fker f tott =
Re r Shpradan site cornroitter-' s letter of
07/5'. ''86, submitted in response to EPA'?
.1.04 (c=>) response letter
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
J.X.'CMJMEMT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES!
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/nS^
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
T TITLE:
87
07/C-5/06
001
Gary M. Rcaxeri, Associate General Counsel
Celanese
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial T'roject Mflnaper-,
Superfi.ind Enforceroent Branch, U.S. EPA
Rerjion VI
C o r respond e vi r p
Re: CeO anece jnitia] response to Ef'A's
letlur of June £c.', 198£, requesting
inforrnat iori concerninrj ihejr ciEpC'sal
activities at the She-icijtr/ Disposal Service
f i 11?
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
HDttJNJSTRATJVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDPN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OL£J3£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUM't: NT DAT L :
NUMBER OF
AUTHOR:
88
RECIPIENT:
TiT'Er
TITLE
07, 'if,
00 1
beorge R. H&rve]l, 331, Manager c-f
Environment ed Invest a gat ions
Vfcls i col Chemical Corporation
Ri.ivh L. Irraeli, Remedial Project Manag
Superf i.:nd Enforcement Branch, U. S.
Re Si on VI
Cor ret poncWice
Re: Ve?lsi col's response to EPP' s
for infot-tnst 3 on regards ng pot sable di spor-Sa
pcti.'itaeu C't the- £hcracl-:\ri Disposal Serviie
f ) 1 f -
DOCUMZ.'JT Nj
D'.ir.i.ii'-t-rr- L;T:L:
NUMBER OP PP.SES
D'JPJKEur TVPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
0
Robsrt P". k'eris, Vice President arin
Tre='S LI -'ei
T.H. HE,'' 3 cult Lire f K'ut rav 3 on Company, Inc.
PuLn L. lLr?eli, Rerneciai Project Mr.nra;*',- ,
&upei f '.md Eni'drceinerit Srfricn, U. £. Ef:fi
Region VI
Ccn'-resporicjence and P.tt achrnonts.
Re: T.H. fieri culture f. Nutrition Company's
ir>,'o] vcrntnt PS- a Pot erit ie-3 ly Rp.-s-pcniro ble
Party for the Sheridan Disposal Service
f: i t- e
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUI1ENT DP:TE :
NUMBER Or PAGES i
flUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
-f T1TLC:
90
07/29/fiG
OOc.'
U1. F. Buchhciltr, Er:virorimc»r.tsl Coordinator
Exxon Che-nucal fimerices
Ri.'th L. ]^rsc-li, Re?r.iedac.l Project Manager ,
S-ipe>'fun'cJ Enfor-cf-'ment Branch, U.S. EPfl
Re-g 3 or, V3
Correspondence
Exxon response? to EPfl ' E request for
information regarding SDS site; ana their
p=,r i j c : PC-7 3 on ai a P'ot ent la 1 3 y Res-pir-nr i blf-
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHEPIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AJTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DOM.H'iENT TVPE :
DOCUMENT TITLE
91
07/30/&G
001
David M. Hayes, Senior Environmenta3
Engineer
Crown Centra] F'et roJeuni Corporation
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Pro.je?ct Manage,',
Supfrfund Enf or cement Branch, U.S. EPA
Region VI
C o r r ev p o n d e n c e
Re: Crown Central Petroleum's
pc'.rt j c.-3 p=»t 3 :•"! jn the Ehf-riOe^n Site Steei'iny
CoMfri 11 -etr
•=),:•
J u if. i. (MfcK'T DATE:
f - \j M 3 Lr R 0." P A 5 E
Kt.i'i t-iu1':
COMrT:' •/ T.CENCY
"•,:.(. JP'LF "r :
v"' TJTLE
001
isin S. Gataw^y, President
Gulf Valve Company
F-'i.'tn L. Jrrasla, F-erne-d i »1 Projecw. Ma'-isyer-,
SuperfuncJ Enforcement Branch, L'. S. EPA
F;e i; .1 •:•;•• V."
Corres pondenre
Re.-: Gu'ii" Vc-Jve Corpfieny' E reupC'n^e to EPn' £
request for inf ovrnat; ion regarding di&posal
activity, by their company, at tne Sheridan
Disposal Service site
DOCUMCiJT NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
niJTHOR:
COMPflNY/flGENCV:
RECIPIENT:
1'CK.l.1. :L'r/:
TYPE
TT
93
07/i".3 /Be,
00£
fi. E'. Kriipht, Vice F'reEJrient, Safety
Groenayke Transport, Inc.
Rutfi L. Jrr^eli, Remedial F'roject Mt».nager,
Superfunc! Enforcement Branch, U. S. EPA
Reci ion V]
C o r r e £ p o n d e n c e
Re: troefidyt-e Transport's response? to
EPA's request for information pertair.inr; to
poK-fr-ib] e disposa] acl3v:tiess at the
Sheridan Disposal Service site
-------
SITE NftMFI:
SITE NUMBER?
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
F I NW
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
IXHCUME-.kT DATE:
NUMEfER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
M:-f..UMtrx-7 T17LL:
OB/O;
oo i
D. K.
1 I nd us t r i e-a
Ruth L. Jrraeli, Rprnediel Project Mpnsrj
S'jpe^f und Eriforcernent tran^n, U. S. EPn
Rp'ifiri V]
os po rid eric-e
-Jih&r : crn £o t £• Bteerinc: Coriirnj.ttee' s
i i ng of W>at^'r» Industries response
r. C3'.!fc£.i i c-ri£ re- yard 3 ny trieir 3 rivo) vet
'lit: i '. t 6
Cor
R£?:
to
rOCUMEXT NUMBER
Df'f.l.iME?-.'T DftTC:
NUM?EP OF
P:..ITHDr<:
Ni I" if'J i.'fj'T :
DOCUMENT TYPE:
1 ;-•;;• iMr.-.'T T3T_C:
PI"I« 11 i ve ™e
f-'iith L. Jnrc'fc'J.i, RfrMCc1 :• c- 3 Pro le-ct [.iffjce-;--
Einperfnrid Fnforcremerit Er^roh, U.S. EPft
F-fiMDC-r. VJ
Cor res pond ne ce a nd fit"; schrne i'it s
Re-1 Mi. Int.,je3h'r. re^ronep to EJ-'Ai's
request for inforp?!ion regarding Positive
Ffc>f-'d' & irivcilverotnt at the Sheridan
Service site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
r.-lJU.^'-^?-^' Df-iTE:
NUMBER OF PflOES:
RUTHOR:
GCUi'.EM TYPE:
l'iC:L"'i^N7 T3TLE:
003
Gary M. Roweri^ flssoci«?te Ben»r£*l Counsel
Celanose
Ruth L.^ Israeli, Remedial Proje-c-t Officer,
Superfunc Etiforcevnent Brench, U.S. EPA
K'e R 5 on VI
C o r r t? = p • r'.n d e n c e
F\e--: Further reE-pdnji-K frciro Cl'e3c*ne&e, to
EPfl's letter of June £3, 1986, regarding
j nf or-fo^t ion ccincernj ng the Bher 3 rein
Discosal Service site
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX-
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofc£J3£J47
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUML'NT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ALJTHDr::
COMPANY.'AGENCY:
RFC I PIT: N'T:
DOCUMENT T TT-E :
DOCUMENT TITLE:
97
oe/ i
004
Stephen P. Krchnis, Environment-^ a .1 Attorney
Monssnto Company
Al]yn M. Davis, Director-, Harerdous Waste
Me ri a g erne nt Division, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Monsanto' s response to EPA' s 104 (e) letter
dc'' ec+ 07/30/86 renardi nr.| possible liability
as a Potent i el ly Responsi Die Party for the
9-!LTirir,-. DispC'Sc-J Service site, iti Waller
CO'-mt T> ' •
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NLH'izcF? cr PAGES;;
Do;:jxzrjT TVPE.-
•38
08/3 3/86
O'I'S
Harold N. Mtir, Vice-President
Pacific Molasses Company
Pijth L. Ir!'e>eli, Remedial P'rc'.iprt Manapor.
Superfunci Erforcernent Branch, U.S. EPA
t'-.-.•'_, . c-n VI
Cor r^espondenc^e
Pc«c.3f)c Mo]es£.e:» Cornpsny renpc-ne-e? to EP'A'E
request for information regardincj the
roifipany' s diEpoeel activities et the
Sheridan Disposal Service site, in
Hf.-rnpstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DCC'JN'NT TYPE:
r-C'ri:MENT TITLE:
93
00/J3/8L
001
C. H. Ri.v&rc
Shell Oil Company / Shell Chemical Company
Ruth L. Israeli, Rernedial Project M<-nag&r,
Euperfi.ind Er-forcersient Branch, U.S. EPA
Region V3
Cor re = pondence
Re: Stie] 1 Oil Company's involvement as <=•
Potentially Responsiole P^rty at the
5-hr-r-idan Dispo&aJ Service site; and
regarding their participation in the*
y n Ti i C. i 1 1 -V 1 r,r-^i\-i + \ r-, f -, i, t: c_ f .-.* 4- . . - - - * -
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
FI NAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
UOC-UMENT DATE :
NUMBER OF PASES;
1 00
COMPANY /AGENCY :
MiCUPiENT TVP-E:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
007
H. N. Cunro ngriariiv III, Attorney
Pulley, Cole, Poowrts (• Cunningham,
Attorneys er-a Cous-Tiselors at Law
Ri.it h L. Israeli, Remedial Project Ma'iager,
Super fund Enf en-cement Br&ncn, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
C £ H Tre>n»portat .ion response to EPA' r>
request f'.-r inforrriPt : ori regaroing their
poss\ t.'le '.•&& of S! ericjein Disposal Service
r.t c^ wf. ?-tt? diEpC'sa] site
J'Oi.UMirtvT DSTL :
fDUMBER OF PAGES!
/•'lij'i HOr :
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
i 0 1
001
Arthur J. J. 1. eutermt-.n, P'h, D. ,
E n v i r o fi rn e r 1 1 e 1 E n g i n e e f i fi :j
Dresse-r Indastr if?s, ]r.c.
Ruth L, I:.r-=teli, Rt-r.-.e-'.-i -:-.'! Pr^joc'; Mgri-a
£.upertur-ia Er.f :n-t:-£-->riient tfe-rich, U. B. EPA
R^g ion VI
DI's response to EPA' s request for
iriforrca-t ion regarding di spot-el ertivi
at the SDS siite; and, also aboi.it the:. r
becor-'i ng a foorober of the site committee
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DDCUI'irrJT DATE :
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
RECIP.:EM~:
DOfUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
10£
oe/i-e/ee
029
Jemes, E. Colern?n, Vice President, Printing
Ink Division
vT. M. Huber C>:it porst i on
Ruth L. Israeli, Remecial Project Manage-r,
Super fund Errf or crenierit E'ranch, U.S. E^'A
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
J.M. Huber's response to EPA's request for
information regarding possible rJ i E po«-,a J
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DfJfXIMEK'T DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
r-iUTKOK1:
COMPANY
REC'TPJENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
J>'JLUMF_''.'T TITLE:
103
09/04/66
004
Hcu-c.-jo N. Meier, Vice? Pre-s: dent
Pacific Molasses Company
Ruth L. Irraeli, Remedial Project M? neper,
Sup?-rfund Enforcement Branch, U.S. Ef-'fc
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
F'' €-:•: -P n> riQ any pof-s j. b)«? djsposa] activity
cit tne 2"it.-.- ifjc'r. Dispos'a.* Sfer\ icti site
DOCUMENT N'JMSE
104
f rjKPK!-:-. /r.!Cs!,-C.N-
r.ECIPIIir,'"'":
j) : IJM."['T '.' rPL' :
DGC'jr'iENT TJT1.F
("l "1,4
Ruth L.. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
£>.iperfund Enforcement Section
U. &. EPfi Kf-rnc.n VJ
U.S. EPA P e L; i o n VI S11 e; F i 1 e.« -.-,
Mcitt i r.y r-;tfCfnc'c!
rh-^ridan Disposal Service site meeting
ar,(vr,d,-i for tnt? 09/OD/6L c-Miifwrence field on
the H>drogeology Remedial Investigation
Rfpor-t
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DlJC.UMil'NT DflTE:
r'L'v.EiER Or PAGES:
ttUTHOft:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
105
03/OB/66
001
Ruth Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U. S. E-'ft Region VI
U.S. EPP. Reg:.on VI Site Files
Rec-oro of Communicat ic>ns
EP'A* ;5 meeting ^ith Sheridan Site Steering
Ccimfp 3 i t ecj, to dir..c:uufc the rave nun. n
problems vjith Chapter 4 (hydrogeology
rhrrpte-r) of the Renirdja] Invest i gat 3 on
report
-------
SITE
SITE
NAME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FI'v'AL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBERi
DOCUMENT DOTE;
NUMBER OF PAGES:
RUT HOP:
C 0 M P H r-J Y / H G £ fv C V :
1 06
DOCUMENT TYPE:
rif.Uif'iDxT TITLE:
00£
Ws 1 lism P. f-l3 ] isc-n
Sewell ? Rages
Ruth L, T?r*eli, Remeo'is] Project feri
Sv.perf und Enforcement Blench, U. S. EP'fi
Ren i on VI
COY- res pond erice
Re: Pe-ppc.-r Fender 3 rit)i: response to EPfl" s
request for information coricerning possible
eict i vs t ?' fr& ot the- Sher 3 dc-iri Dispose) Service
DOCUMENT NUMBER
Mar: ;.!('•;.- NT K-,TF: :
NUMBER OF PAGEs
fl'. ITHOR:
RECIPIENT:
nOCUMEN'T TYPE :
);OU.''1:iNT TJ'iLE:
Larry D. l.'right, Chief, Suaerfund
£1 r P f o r c e; ro ;r n t S e c 11 o n
'.i. £. L'PR Rogson VI
Le».^ry E. Feiocamp, Chairman, Sheridan Site
S+. e '_• •• . r.y CC'fuin 11 V t-t., tv? ke r- & Be-t 11.
Cor res ponde?nce and fit t achment »
Re: Detailed coffiiiient s on Chapter 4 of the
Sheridan Disposal Service Remedial
t 3.ge»t;ion (RI) Report dateci 07/01/66
DOCUMZNT NUMBER
DOCUMENT DATE:
r.'JNBZR OF PAGES
ftUTHORr
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
r/jr.!'M:I\'T TITLE:
108
10/£7/B6
041
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Super-fund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPft Region VI
Larry Feldcsmp, Chairrnsn, Sheridan
Ste&riTiLj Cornms ttee, Paker & Botts
Correspondence and fitt achrnents
Technical review of the Remedial
Investigation (RI) submitted
Jih er 3 rj an P i t e Conim j 11 ee, for
Disposal Service site
Site?
by the
the Sheridan
-------
«DMINISTRflTIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDfiN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£ 132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOLUKENT D&TE :
NUMBER OF PftGES:
Pi I iTHC.iP:
COMPKNY/PGEfJCY:
F;f-'C: PI E'-'"!":
DQD .'f'-Ei'
TYPE:
TJTLE:
103
ll/J£/fl£
415
T : rn f:" . £ ) eet (-1 , f-tt t orne /
Lew Office of Smith f, Hul«»py
Ruth L. IsrseJj, Remedial F'ro.ject Manager,
5 1. 1. per f LI rid Enforcement Section, U.S. EF'ft
Ps:
resnonc'erice and ftttechriients
'f l~i f\ f 't e- r Int f-rnal 3 on? J Oil Cornp-xny* =
pofiiis? to E"'A' s I04(e) Notice Lc?tter, in
t-irds t •:• d i sos?). e»r. t 3 \'3 1 ices ?t the
i-pon-is? to Er-'M's K>4(e) Notice
JjM-ds t C' d3. EPOS? 1 e»Cl t 3 \'3 t !£?£
•>r- .idr-.n D: Et:'0«5l Sfcrvicre site
R'-JT-O'-::
V i f '•'['.
<:• i >:
Puth L. ]rraf«]3, Remedial Project
S 1. 1 p e r f • I n r. ' E n "" •.:• r c e rn e n t S e? c t ion
Listed Retpo
C or r £.-«•. pc>ricc?ric t:1
Notification to various respondents thai;
the-/ fu-ve b-:vf-:n 3 tsfc-rri 3 f led a.:; c> pottfnt ie»]
niernber of the Sheridan Disposal Service
[3 ^ t e St PP r i ng Cornrn i 1 1 ee
DCCL'":£.f 'T ""JMBEP
I:DC!»Mr:r.T DATE:
NUiC^T :."" PnGE^
fiUT.'-JORs
COMPflfJV/PGENCY:
KLCIPICfJT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
:.''r TTTLE:
1 1 1
03/13/67
007
Richard H. Fuller, P. B.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. I n r aci'13, Rfc-rnedial Project
Superfur-id Enforcernent Section, U.S. EPrt
Rt.pjon VT
Correnpor-iderice and fittachrnents
F'r el : no. nary Sampling ?nr! ftneiytis F'Jan fcr
Sheridan Disposal Service :--ite
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ODKINISTROTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMEn Bate
Steering Committee
Baker ?, Botts
Ruth L. Izr^eli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPn
Rt-rjion VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Sign&d ftdm j ni jrt rat : ve Liroer-s- from
1i stec Respondent s
ENT NUMBER i
DATtT:
fJJMBEF OF PA3ES:
H .ITV-iDR;
COMMON Y/ftGErjCr:
^n: 3 PJ [:?•.'•":
DOCUMENT T t'PE :
):•(![:uxirn TITLE:
05 /£.'£/£-7
01 £
Joh>-i Fonv, P'. E. , Senior Project Eric:.neer
ERT
R ut h 1 - r «f? 3 3, Reiiir-c' i a 1 Pro j ec t M^nrger,
S i' p e r f LI r-i d E n f o f c s m e n t 5 e c t j. o n, U. £. FI f:' H
f'f.'tji on VJ
Cofresponaence enc: Httachments
Rt: ft compf;r ison of PC3; s discussion of
s; e* en p 13 ri y 3rf.'Ced«.ire-= ufec-d by Resource
TTIMJ ruver my ir( fiC'3(J i^ivrM iyet ions of
sludge depth
DOCUMENT N'JME-tER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPAN! Y/ftSEKCY:
RECIPIENT:
UiJLLIMEfa TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
134
0£/03/fl7
107
Frances E. Phi Dips, Meting Regional
Odrninistrator
U.S. EPA Region V3
Respondents ?= listed in Attachment 0
ndrnj tii-jt rat 3 v& Order- on Consent
Objectives of Ord^r- are (ft) to determine
the? nature/extent of threat if any to
public healtii by me^r-s of an RI or (B) to
riff t e-rn i rie- t he necfe-s r. i t y f or remeo' i a 3. act: on
by means of a FS
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERI DON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£,£13
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOfJUMEiNT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT :
DGCUr-'LItJT TYPE:
rjfjf;u^i:Krr T JTL.E:
110
03/16/07
003
j&$r\ Zimmerman, P'roiect Coor cj i nator
Rocky Mountain Analytical LaDor£:.'. 0V' «nc; No. 3 0 were reanslvren fc-r TD>.
DDCUMETf.'T DP7E:
NUMBER OF PA3ES:
H'J'rHDR:
COMPAQy'HGENCr:
1-TLJP.lK'vT:
119
Rc'bert T. Eteuart
Jones, L'?\, Es executed by the
property owners-^ t ^>e Sher : clr»n' s, to provider
FPA a^'-f-ii-j L o the d • ':-: pc":; e. ] sxte
DOCUMENT NUMBER :
MJCUMCN'T DATE:
NUMDER OF PAGES:
nUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DdCUMFNT TYPE :
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1 SO
03A-:£./87
001
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfuno
Ei'if orcre'iient Sect ion
U. 5. EPA Region VI
Larry FeIdcamp, Bakor f Botts
Corre^ pondence
Re: EPA'r. comments on the Groundwater
Mi gr«?t i on Manageine-nt Retnt d :• a 1 ) nvest i gevt ) on
Work Plan for the Sheridan Disposal Serviro
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofe£.t32147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
J.Vif.Ui'iiiN'l TJ7LE:
115
OS/13/67
027
M a r ^ Lars o n, H y c J r o r- e o ] o p a F. t
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manar-er,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EP'H
Rroyicn'i V]
Corresporiderice and Attachrrentr.
TI"iCj •f'or'it fi'Cint h) y grciundwster s-arnp] ; ng
effort performj-d ay Envirorirnem; Reso>.ircre£)"
fr-srifne-Merit ?•!: the Sherioan Disposal Service
Site, J*tn.i*rj £2 ?nc 23, 1987
DOCUMENT NUMB
POr. LIMIT NT DfiTE
NUMBER DP PAG
fiUTHQK:
DCCLJMEr.'T TYPE
0£'/ Z t-/'B7
019
Mark Lfirs-ori, Hydf-ogeci] ogist
Js'.cot's: Ef:girier?rirr[j Group, In
r»uth L. Jrrr. t f
DOCUI'IENT ML'-IECR:
DOCUMENT DfiTE i
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY /AGENCY:
RCCIPIENT:
117
or.i.iMEi\rr TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
002
Ruth L. Ir.raeJi, Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA Region VI
John L'ottere)!, c/:< ERh-Southwest , Site-
Project Manager, Sheridan Site Committee
Cor-r li-cjpondonce
Re?: PCB Sp-lit S?'nples, Sludge Sampling
P'r-i:.c.-edi.:rc?£, i-.na dopth c-f coritprm nat ion of
the soil
-------
APPENDIX D
TEXAS WATER COMMISSION
. J. Wynne. HI, Chairman
'Paul Hopkins, Commissioner
John O. Houchtns, Commissioner
Allen Befnke, Executive Director
Michael E. Field. General Counsel
Brenda W. Foster, Chief Clerk
December 27, 1988
Allyn M. Davis, Ph.D., Director
Hazardous Waste Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region VI
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
Re: Sheridan Disposal Services Superfund Site
Record of Decision
Dear Dr. Davis:
We have reviewed the proposed Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Sheridan Disposal Services Superfund Site. We have no objection
to the selected remedy as described in the draft ROD attached to
your letter of December 16, 1988. The selected remedy requires
the use of biotreatment followed by stabilization and capping of
residuals.
Sincerely,
Allen P. Beinke
Executive Director
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0&£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
03/31/67
0 IE-
Mark J. Larson, HydrogeoJogist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: -Grounc/water Sampling activities et
Sheridan Disposal Services, Hempstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF-' PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1££
04/01/87
007
Mark J. Larson, Hydrogeologist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Copies of the EPA Chain-of-Custody
Records and SAS Packing List; and,
regarding internal analysis that were
performed with the field instruments
employed during the sampling effort
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT?
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
123
04/10/67
004
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Status- Report for 03/67; and the sample
results from the January and February
sample activities
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06213E147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ABENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1£4
04/16/87
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manage*-,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Carl Hickam, Regional Represenative, Agsncy
for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry
Memorandum
Re: 'Request for evaluation of Sheridan
Disposal Service site Rat Acute Toxicity
Test
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DfiTE:
NUMBER OF PflBES:
AUTHOR:
COMPAfv'Y/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
04/16/67
003
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U. S. EPA Region VI
John Cotterr-el 1, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Bite Steering Committee, Baker &
Bot t s
Correspondence
Sheridan Disposal Service Meeting held on
O4/10/87, to discuss the Agency's comments
on the Broundwater Migration Management
Remedial Investigation Work Plan
i
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DfiTE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
126
04/£0/07
0£3
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Reg;on VI
John Cotterell, Sheridan Site Steering
Committee Project Manager-
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: EPA comments on the Sheridan Disposal
Service Source Control Remedial
Investi gati on Report
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1£7
05/06/87
003
John M. Cotterell, P. E. ,
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, U.S. EPA
Status Report
Cover letter with attached
Committee Technical Status
April', 19Bfe
Project Manager-
Region VI
Sheridan Site
Report for
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGESi
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUM&- - TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1£8
05/11/87
040
Edward Fry, Technical Assistance Team
Ecology & Environment, Inc,
J. Chris Peterson, Deputy Project Officer,
U.S. EPA Region VI
Report
Site Assessment Report for the Sheridan
Disposal Service site prepared for EPA's
Emergency Response Branch
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER CF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
129
05/15/87
008
Harry C, Day, Jr., Hydrogeologist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Groundwater Sampling Activities for
the Sheridan Disposal Service Site,
Hernpstead, TX
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
130
06/01/87
544
Staff Engineers
Resource Engineering for Sheridan Site
Steering Committee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files/Texas Water
Commission
Report
Source Cont ro 1 Rerned i a 1 I nvest i gat i on
Report for Sheridan Disposal Service Site
fispend i x Vo i urne I
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
RjiXiMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
f-UJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
131
OS/01/87
472
Resource Engineering for Sheridan Site
Steering Committee
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files/Texas Water
Commission
Report
Source Cont ro 1 Rerned i a 1 I nvest i cat i on
Report for the Sheridan Disposal Service
tcf, Appendiccjs Volume II
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
13£
06/01/67
545
EtAff Engineers
Resource Engineering for Sheridan Site
Steering Committee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files/Texas Water
Commission
Report
Source Control Remedial Investigation
Report for the Sheridan Disposal Service
site Appendices, Voloume III
44
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 063132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
133
06/08/87
004
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Doug Diehl, ERfc-Southwest, Inc.
Transmi 11ed Correspondence
Re?: Amended Soils and Sludge
Investigations for Sheridan Disposal
Service Super fund site in Hempstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
134
06/09/87
OOc.'
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Sheridan Disposal Service site Work Plan
for the Groundwater Migration Management
cf i a 1 I nvett i gat i on
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
135
06/15/87
COS
Ruth Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Filer,
Memorandum
Re: Meeting held to discuss EPA's comments
on the Work Plan for Disposal of
Impoundment Water in the evaporation system
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
136
06/17/87
001
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Super fund
Enforcement Section
Li. S. EPA Region VI
John CottereH, Sheridan Site Steering
Comni j 11 &e, Beker & Bot t s
Correspondence
Re: Work Plan for Field Studies Supporting
Risk Assessment and Source Control
Feasibility Studies, Sheridan Disposal
Service cite
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTMOR:
COMPflNY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
137
06/16/67
029
Staff Consultants
ERM-Souchwest, Inc.
Li. S. EPA Region VI
Work Plan
Work Plan For Field Studies Supporting Risk
Assessment and Source Control Feasibility
St udiec
DOCUMENT NUMBERJ
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
138
06/16/87
002
Chris E. Tanner, P. E.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Sectiovi, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Requested changes to the Work Plan for
Disposal of Impoundment of Water, 06/09/87;
and, the Work Plan for Field Studies
Supporting Risk Assessment and Source
Control Feasibility Studies, 06/11/87
i
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD <:>&£• 132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
139
07/01/87
3B6
Staff Engineers
Resource Engineering for Sheridan Site
Steering Co nuni11ee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files/Texas Water
Commission
Report
Source Control Remedial Investigation for
Sheridan Disposal Service site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
f-UJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
JXJCUMIk'T TITLE:
140
07/01/67
005
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John Cotterell, Project Manager, Sheridan
Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Re i ftpprovel of Source Control Remedial
Investigation (RI), for Sheridan Disposal
Pf?rvice site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
flUTHDR:
COMPANY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
141
07/02/67
009
Edward Fry, Technical fissistance Team
Ecology & Environment, Inc.
J. Chris Peterson, Deputy Project Officer,
U.S. EPA Region VI
Report
Re: Report on the Freeboard Check at the
Sheridan Disposal Service Site; and trip
rirsr-ret j ve photographs and attachments
-------
SITE
BITE
NAME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT PATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
REVCIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
142
07/0£/S7
004
Eugene Harris, Land Pollution Control Div. ,
Edwin Barth and Ronald Lewis, RA3,
Cont a i nment Bra rich
U.S. EPA, Office of Research and
Development-, Hazardous Waste? Engineering
Research Laboratory
Rober-t Hennesschiager, Chief, Buperfund
Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA Region VI
Memorandums
Attached rnernos regarding Review of Proposed
Treat-ability Studies for the? Sheridan site;
vjriri, Technical Comments for the Sheridan
Disposal Service Super-fund site, in
Hempstead, TX
i
DOCUMEN'- NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
143
07/08/67
047
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P.E., Regional
Ad mi n i st rat or
U. S. EPA Region VI
Respondents as Listed in Attachment f»
Administrative Order
(1) Respondents shall appoint a Facility
Coordinator to be responsible for oversight
of activities required by Order, <£)
Respondents shall lower level of
contaminated storrnwater in disposal pond
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITuE:
144
07/03/67
0£1
Anne Harrington, Hydrogelegist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Oversight of Sludge Sampling for the
Sheridan Disposal Service site
46
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0&£'13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
145
07/09/87
023
Rob i n Seq u i n, Env i ronment a 1 Be i ent i st
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
R&: -Groundwster and Soil Evaporation
System Borings Sampling Activities for the
Sheridan Disposal Service site, Hempstead,
TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
niJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
146
07/10/67
003
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Rep ion VI
John Cotters!1, Sheridan Project Manager,
Sheridan Bite Steering Committee
Correspondence and Attachments
Comments on the Proposed Treatsbi1 ity
Studies for the Sheridan Disposal Service
Site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
147
07/16/87
020
Rashid Khalid, Soil Scientist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Izr-aeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum and Attachments
Groundwater Sampling / Conductivity Survey
for Sheridan Disposal Service site,
Hernpsteari, TX
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
148
07/17/87
00£
Robert. T. Stewart, Vice Chairman
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
RP: -Implementation of the Sheridan
Disposal Service site Administrative Order
on Consent by the Sheridan Site Steering
Committee
143
07/17/67
051
Robin Sequin, Environmental Scientist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment-5
Re: Dike So i1 Bor i ngu Sampling Act i vi t i
for the Sheridan Disposal Service site
He-rnpstead, TX
i
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
150
07/17/87
001
Unspecified
Unspecified
Gary Guerra, Dn-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Pol rep No. Ol - PRP Monitoring
Re: Implementation of the proposed work
plan began July 13, 1387. Site preparation
is being done so the pumping action can
begin.
5O
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£>2132I47
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
151
07/£1/67
001
Ruth L. Izreeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.5. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File*
Trip Report
Tr.ip to oversee the installation of
mot i i tor ing we11s by the Pot ent i a11y
Responsible Parties of Sheridan Disposal
Bc-?r\'icc- site
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
07/22/67
001
Unspecified
Unspeci fied
Gary Buerra, On-Scene Coordinator., U.S. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 0£ - PRP Monitoring
Re.1: Implementation of the proposed work
p]?n is continuing.
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
153
07/27/87
001
Unspeci fieo
Unspecified
Gary Buerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 03 - PRP Monitoring
Re: Pumping of the storm water in the
containment lagoon began July £5, 1987..
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
154
07/29/87
001
Unspecified
Unspeci f iad
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 04 - PRP Monitoring
Re: Pumping of storm water from the
conta-inrnent 1spoon is continuing at the
rate of approximately 400/gallons per
minutes.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
155
07/30/67
001
Unspeci fied
Unspecified
Gary Guerre, On-Scene Coordinator» U.S. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 05 - PRP Monitoring
Re: Pumping of w^ter from the containrnerit
lagoon at tne Sheridan Dispo&al Service
site; has been halted.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
00/05/67
001
Unspecified
Urispeci f ied
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Polr&p No. 06 - PRP Removal
Re: Pumping operations are still halted at
the Sheridan Disposal Service site.
-------
BITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£'13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
oe/oe/67
001
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
6ary W. Guerra, Dn-Scene Coordinator, U.S.
EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Re; l-Jork PI en changes for the Sheridan
Disposal Service site Waste Removal
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOr.:UMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE;
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1T.8
oe/oe/67
oo i
Unspecvi f led
Unspecj fieri
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Polr-pp No. 07 - PRP Removal
Re: As of 11:00 hours, on August 8, 1987,
pumping operations resumed at the Sneridan
Disposal Service site at 10:15.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
159
08/09/67
010
John M. Cotter-ell, P. E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project. Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Sheridan Site Steering Committee monthly
status report for July, 1987
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OLS132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OIJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPfiNY/OGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE;
DOCUMENT TITLE:
160
08/13/87
002
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.5. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Re: Excess turbidity in existing wells;
the method of obtaining samples for
volatile constituents; and the necessity
for both ERM - Southwest and EPA to jointly
the results
161
OS/13/87
001
Unspecjfipd
Unspeci f isci
Gary Guer-ra, On-Scene Coordinator, U. 5. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 08 - PRP Removal
Re: ft water sample from the sump area that
was taken by Chris Tanner of ERM -
Southwest, Inc.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER
POGES:
OIJTHOR:
COMPANY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
16S
03/14/87
569
Staff Consultants
Spectrix Corporation
U. S. EPP; Region VI
Laboratory Reports
Case No. 7558: Part
sample data - OA/QC
I of III; EPfi split
d oc ument at i on
(Available for review
VI, Dallas, Texas)
at U.S. EPA Region
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMIMSTRflTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSflL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
163
08/14/87
454
Staff Consultant£
Spect r i x Cor porat ion
U.S. EPA Region VI
Laboratory Reports
Cese No. 7558: Part II of III; EPA split
samples - QA/QC Documentation (Available
for review el U.S. EPfl Region VI, Dallas,
Texas)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
T TITLE:
1G4
08/14/87
581
Staff Cons u11ants
Spectrix Corporation
U.S. EPfl Region VI
Laboratory Reports
Crs-t No. 7556: Pert III of III; EPfl split
samples - Ofl/QC Documentation (available;
for review at U.S. EPA Region VI, Delias,
Texas)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
OUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
165
08/14/87
40£
Michael Daggett, Chief, Organic Leb,
Houston Branch
U.&. EPfl Region VI
Keith Bradley, Hazardous Waste Section,
U. S, EPfl Region VI
Laboratory Report
Case No. 7483: CLP Data Review for split
samples F6001 and FGOO£ (Available for
review si U.S. EPfl Region VI, Dallas, TX)
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Obc: 13£ 147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
16,6
08/21/67
001
Unspecified
Unspecified
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Pol rep No. 03 -
Re: Pumping is
at the Sheridan Disposal Service site.
PRP Removal
proceed ing with out
incident
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
167
06/24/67
004
W. F. Buchholts
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Roif Norstrum, Office of the Honorable M.
Sweeney, U.S. House of Represenatives
Correspondence
A current background report on the
activities being conducted by the1 Sheridan
Site Steering Committee at the Sheridan
Disposal Service Site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1G8
06/27/67
001
Unspecified
Unspecified
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U.B. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 10 - PRP Removal
Re: Pumping operations at the Sheridan
Disposal Service site have ceased, due to
mechanical failure of the pump.
-------
SITE NflME:
SITE NUMBER:
PDMINISTRftTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
ftUTHDR:
COMPftNY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
169
09/03/87
001
Line peer i f led
Unspecified
Gary Guerre, On-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPfi
Region VI
Polrep No. 11 - PRP Removal
Re: Pumping operations at the Sheridan
Disposal Service site are still halted,
to the unwillingness
to repair the pump.
due
of the rental company,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ttlJTHDK:
COMPftNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
170
09/05/87
003
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPft
Region VI
Correspondence?
Sheridan Site- Committee Status Report for
ftiigust, 1937, provided by the site
c-oinnu 11 ee
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PfiGES:
fiUTHOR:
COMPflNY/OGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
171
09/10/67
001
Urispeci f ied
Unspecified
Bery Guerrs, On-Serene Coordinator, U.S. EPft
Region VI
Polrep No. IS - PRP Removal
Re: Pumping operations have ceased at the
Sheridan Disposal Service site. The water-
level of the lagoon was lowered to a point,
that continued pumping is no longer
necessary.
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
172
09/17/67
001
Unspecif led
Unspecified
Gary Guerra, On-Scene Coordinator, U. E. EPA
Region VI
Polrep No. 13 - PRP Removal
Re: All emergency pumping operations at
the Sheridan Disposal Service site are now
complete and that all objectives of the
/administrative order were met
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT T 3. TLE :
173
09/17/67
001
Ruth Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Carl Hickarn, Regional Representative, Agency
for Toxic Substance and E>isease Registry
Memorandum
Sheridan Disposal Services Eno'angerrnent
Assessment given to Mr. Hickarn for his
T-evi&w
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
flUTHQK:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
09/21/87
14£
Michael Dagpett, Chief, Organic Lab
Section, Houston Branch
U.S. EPA Region VI
Keith Bradley, Hazardous Waste Section,
U. S. EPA Region VI
Laboratory Report
Case No. 3106F: Lab raw data results fur
organic samples 3106F-02, 3106F-04,
310GF-06, 310GF-08, 3106F-10 (Available rot-
review at U.S. EPA Region VI, Dallas, TX)
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
175
09/28/67
022
Rob i n Seq u i n, Env i ronrnent a 1 Sc i ent i st
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPn
Region VI
Correspondence and attachments
Inorg-anic Traffic Reports MFF 201 •- 20£,
and FG 004 - FG 015; SAS No. 310&-, and
Chain of Custody Records t-13217 £ 6-13218,
D1113 £ D1114
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
176
10/07/87
Ofvl
Donald W. Beaver, Ph.D., Senior
Geohydrologist
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Oversight of Well Installations Report
for Sheridan Disposal Services site, July
15 - August 8, 1987
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
J.X.'iCUt'iENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
177
10/08/87
002
George L. Pet t i grew, Reg i one 1
Representative of ATSDR, Region VI
Department of Health and Human Services
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Euperfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum
Health consultation regarding Sheridan
Disposal Service site, Hempstead, TX
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
•
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ftlJfHDR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
178
10/08/87
003
John M. Cotterell. P.E., Project Manage^
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region V3
Correspondence
Sheridan Disposal Service Status Report for
September, 19S7, provided by the site
oonihij ttee
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
P.UTHDR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
DOCUMENT TYPE :
DOCUMENT TITLE:
179
10/09/67
007
Chris E. T& finer, P. E.
ERM - Southwest, Inc.
Gary Guprra, On-Scene Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Review of operations of the
evaporation system st the Sheridan Dispose!
Systems site in Hernpstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ftUTHOR:
COMPAf-'v/QRENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
180
10/14/87
Oil
Donald W. Beaver, Work Assignment Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Review of Risk Assessment for Sherioa.n
Disposal Service site
60
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGEUCY
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
101
10/£l/87
0£3
Ruth L. Irraol i, Remedial Project
Manager/Donald W. Beaver, Work Assignment
Manager
U.S. EPA Region Vl/Jacobs Engineering
Group, Inc.
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Corn merit s e ncJ At t ac-hment s
Cor.in*?nts on the Risk Assessment for the
Sheridan Disposal Service site dated
03/15/87, by EPA and Jacobs Engineering
Pit-"i~1111''
\. i .-•.•,-
DOCUMENT NUMBER,1
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ADEN:: Y:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUh1Ef4T TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1SS
10/21/87
00 £
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Super-fund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Review of the Risk Assessment for the
Sheridan site; comments on the document
drafted by EPA's contractor- end the
Remedial Project Manager
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
103
10/£B/87
002
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U. S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Discusses need for the Source Control
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
schedule
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DPiTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/flSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
184
10/28/87
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPfl Region Vif
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Letter to confirm 10/cJ3/B7 conversation
regarding EPfl's comments on the Sheridan
r- i t e-
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
J.iC'CUI-iENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
fVJTHOU:
COMPANY/ABENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1 85
10/30/67
001
Joe Prown, Remedial Investigation Unit,
Superfund Section, Hazardous and Solid
Wai-tp Division
Texas kater Co.Mmissiovi
Ruth L. IrraE-li, Remedial Project Manager,
S'.'per fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPH
on VI
s on the Draft Risk flssee-sment for
the Sheridan site
DDCUMluVT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
•NUMBER OF PAGES i
ftUTHDR:
COMPANY/OSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
IflG
10/30/87
£97
Staff Consultants
Unspecified
U.S. EPA Region VI
Laboratory Report
Case No. 8322: Part I of III; EPfl split
sample data - Qfl/QC Documentat ion
(Available for review at U.S. EPfl Region
VI, Dallas, Texas)
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMEER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Oe-cl3
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
187
10/30/Q7
617
St £}f f Consu j. t ant s-
Unspecified
LI. S. EPfi Region VI
Laboratory Reports
Case No. B3£r.': Part
sample dc*ta - DA/DC
II of III; EPA split
Document3tion
(Available for review at
VI, Dallas, Texas)
U. £'. EPA Region
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE.:
NUMBER OF PAGESi
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
'i TITLE:
108
10/30/67
C95
Staff Consult-ante
Unspecified
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Laboratory Reports
Cat.f? No. C3L'c : Part III of III; EPA split
s-smple data - Q3/QC Dorumentat ion
(f-l\'<.;i j ou3 e for review at U. &. EPfi Region
VI, Dallas, TX)
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
109
11/OS/87
003
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
ERM-Sout hwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Transmittal of list of potential treatment
and containment/disposal technologies
£3
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OG£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OUTHOR;
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
190
11/05/87
004
John M. Cotterell, P.E. , Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
ERM-Southwfest, Inc.
Ruth !„. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section,, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence arid Attachment
Transmittal of the Source Control
Feasibility Study •- Modified Schedule for
the Sheridan site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ftGGMCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT T>PE:
j.n:;:.ii,'-irrv!T TITLE:
191
11/05/67
0£7
Staff Consultants
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
U.S. EPfl Region VI
Work Plan
Work Plan for Phase £ Biodegradation
Studies for Source Control Feasibility
Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
192
11/05/67
019
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P. E. , Regional
Administrator
U.S. EPA Region VI
Respondents as Listed in Attachment A
First Amendment to Administrative Order-
Purpose of Amendment is to (1) include
fifty-eight additional Respondents and (£)
to modify the finding of facts to add
trhemical wastes which were disposed of at
the site
64
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£.£'13£'1A7
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT. DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES;
Al.riHO?<:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
193
11/06/87
006
Chris E. Termer, Sample Personnel
ERM - Southwest, Inc.
John Dotterel 1, Site Project
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Comments by Ruth Israeli, on the
Treatment Studies that was done in July,
1337 at the Sheridan Disposal Service sita
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AiJTHDR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
5.94
]I/15/87
001
Robert E. Hannes-schlaper, P. E, , Chief,
Superf'ind Enforcement Branch
U.5, EPA Region VI
Eugene P. Harris, Technical Assistance?
Co or co. nator, Land Pollution Control Div
U.
EPA
Region
VI
Memorandum
Transrnittal for review a Work Plan for
Dh-^se £ biodegradation studies, a Response
to EF-'fi (incl uciirig HWERL) cornrnerits ori the
Phase I Treat ability Testing Work Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE;
11/14/87
002
John M. Cotte-rell, P. E. , Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Transmittal of response to EPA comments on
the draft Risk. Assessment for the Sheridan
site
-------
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FI KftL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
196
11/30/87
003
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P. E. , Regions 1
Adni i n i st rat or
U.5. EPfl Region VI
Respondents as Listed in Attachment A
First Amendment to A/0 on Consent
Objectives of Order are to (1) allow for an
Endarrfjerment Assessment, (£) increase1
amount of stipulated penalties, and (.~i)
modify R/0 on Consent Respondents List by
adding Respondents to list
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ttUTHDR:
COMPflNY/OSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Dt?UJ!!LNT TITLE:
IE/02/87
COG
Dr. Rajagopetl Krishnamoorthy
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L. Jrraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Rfc»i|ion VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Comments on the Work Plan for the Phase £
Bioclegretdat ion Studies for Source Control
Fea=-ibi 1 ity Study at the Sheridan Disposal
Service site
i
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ AGENCY!
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
198
l£/0£/87
002
Ruth L. Israeli, Super-fund Enforcement
Section, Remedial Project Manager
U. S. EPfl Region VI
John Cotter-ell, Site Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Re: Sheridan Disposal Services Baseline
Risk Assessment Revision, that were
r! > *Kvur»tr.c»d in the November £0, 1987 meeting
regarding this site
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDON DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
MU'fHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
193
ie/03/67
004
John Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Ruth L. Izrseli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfi
Region VI
Correspondence
final y-t j ca?. Results of the groundwater
sampling at -the Sheridan Disposal Service
r. •}. 1: e
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCYi
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£00
12/04/67
009
Ch&rlen ft. D'azcis, Chief, Energcnry Response
Branch
U. S. EPA Region VI
Robert Hannes£chlayer, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA Region VI
Memorandurn *\nd Attached Report
The on-scene coord i runt or' s (Gary Buerra)
ATter Action Report, and the removal ^ile
for thf? the removal action taken at the
Sheridan Disposal Service site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ASENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£01
12/08/67
00£
Robert E. Hannesschlager, P.E., Chief,
Superfund Enforcement Branch
U.S. EPA Region VI
John Cotterell, Project Manager, Sheridan
Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Re: Provisions in SARA, that will affect
trie Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study for the Sheridan Disposal Service
site, that the PRP's are conducting under
the Administrative Order
P. 7
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINfU.
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£15£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
DOCUMENT NUMBERi
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
F
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ftDMlNIETRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINfii_
SHERIDflN DISPOSflL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
fUJTHOR:
COMPPNY/PGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£05
IS/11/87
Unspecified
Unspecified
Unspeci fied
This document was deleted prior- to
shipment, per Ruth Izraeli, Remedial
Projec-t Manager, request.
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
PLJTHDR:
COMPPN'Y/PEENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
1S/18/87
C0£
Ruth L. Izraoli, Remedied Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcemant Section
U.S. EPO Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Rttachmt?nt
Confirmation of results of 12/15/67
conference call discussing ERM-Southuest1=
proposal for the number and location of
samples to be? obtainec from the evaporation
syst ern ; rncip at t ached
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DfiTE:
NUMBER OF PflGESi
tt'J'fl-IOR;
COMPflNY/RSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£07
JL2/E8/87
002
Richard H. Fuller, P. G.
ERK-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Correspondence
Modification to the Background Soil Boring
and Evaporation System Sampling Program* at
the Sheridan site
C Q
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£08
12/29/87
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager.
Superfimd Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Memorandum
Re: Groundwater samples taken 10/28-30/87
by r.RM-Bouthwest staff
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£09
01/04/88
001
Chris* E. Tanner, P. E.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
on 01/£9/68
Notification of sampling effort
as identified in Work Plan for
t i on 9t udies
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ttUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£10
01/04/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
LI. S, EPA Reuion VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridcin Site Committee
Correspondence
Follow-up on discussions of background
samples, borings and soil samples for the
She-ridan site-
70
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SITE NAME:
BITE NUMBER:
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OG£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£11
01/05/68
00£
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super fund E ri f or ceme n t Sec t i o r>
Li, S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager,
Sher i dan Site Cornrn i 11 ee
Correspondence and Attachment
Comments and suggestions on the Work P]an
for Phase £ Biodegradation Studies dated
11/05/67
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT PATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
P.'.JTHDR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT :
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£12
01/09/68
00£
John M. Coiterel3v f-'. E. ,, Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Inracli, Remedial Project Manager
SJuperfund Enforcement Section, U. J;. EPP
Rr:-r;j.on VI
C o r r e 5 p o n d e n t? e
Confirmation of 01/05/88 telephone
conversation to review problems encourrcev
with the- additions] modeling for the
Endangerrnent Assessment
•eo
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PfiGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
01/E3/66
001
Richard Fuller, P. B.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remecial Project Manaper,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Cor res pondence?
Trantmittsl of "Baseline Endflngerment
Assessment" for the Sheridan site
71
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PPGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
01/2&/6B
006
Richard H. Fuller, P. G.
ERM - Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial
Project Manager
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Re2ion VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Analytical Results of Background and
Evaporation System Soil Borings for the
Eheridan Disposal Service site, in
Hernpstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
N'JKBER OF PAGES:
OUTHOK:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
I;Di:.UMCNT TITLE!
£5.5
OE/05/BB
005
Gary Miller
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc,
Ruth L. Izr-acli, Remecif.] Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment's
FCH: Thr- trip report for- EC Groves over-site
of the November and December aquifer test-3
at the Sheridan Disposal Service site
DOCUMENT .NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER Z" POSES;
RUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLEi
£16
02/09/68
001
Donald W. Beaver, Work Assignment Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. I2rae-liv Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Ra-gion VI
Cor respond evice»
Review comments for "Baseline Endangerpent
Assessment" for the Sheridan site prepared
by ERM-Southwest, Inc.
-------
flDMINISTRflTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINflL
SITE NflME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHE R I DON DISPOSflL SERVICE
TXD OS£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
flUTHOR:
COMPflNY/flSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
•is Tanner,
President
Files
P. E. » end
£17
0£/09/88
034
Bruce H. Clarke, Chr
Douglas Diehl, P.E.,
ERM-South west, Inc.
U.S. EPfl Region VI Site
Report
Phase I Biological Treatafoi1jty Report
Source Control Feasibility Study
for
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DPiTFJ:
NUMBER OF PflGES!
flUTHOR:
COMPflNY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE!
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£18
0£/ 11/88
0 1 A
Gsry Miller
Jacobs Engineering
Ruth Israeli, U.S.
Correspondence and
Group Inc.
EPfl Region VI
fit t ached Report
Field Oversight Report
Ver i f ic«xt ion/ Oversight
Back t| round /Evopor at ion
December £8-30, 1987
for
Pond Eanipl ing,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PfiGES:
flUTHQR:
COMPflNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£.1.3
02/18/88
001
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Euperfund
Enforcement Section
U. 5. EPfl Region VI
Bill Hansen, Chief, Site? Policy & Guidance
Branch, U.S. E*fl Region VI
Memorandum
Re: Request for evaluation of Soil Cl
criteria concerning PCB's, which may be
relevant and appropriate for the Sheridan
Disposal Service site
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
flDMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PftGES:
flUTHOR:
COMPONY/OGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££0
O£/£4/8e
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPfl Ration VI
Greg Tipple, Remedial Investigation Unit
Head, Super-fund Section, Texas Water
Commission
Correspondence
Request for State flRftRs, particularly in
regards to in—place closure (capping) of
wastes which contain from 50 to £00 pprn of
po1ych1 ori neted o i pheny15
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
).>nr.UMENT DfiTE:
NUMBER OF PflSES:
ttUTHQR;
COMPP.NY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££1
00£
Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy, Ph.D.,
En v i r onrns rit a 1 Eng i neer
Je-cobs Enriineeff j ng Group Inc.
Ruth L. I zv«-iel i, Rerncsriial Project Manager,
Super fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
toe mo rand urn
Review of Sheridan Disposal Services-Phase
I Biological Treatability Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUfOxT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
ftUTHOR:
COMPANY/A6EIMCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
01YE5/BS
00£
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager.,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Purpose of letter is to confirm conference
call of 02/16/88 and 02/18/88 and to
rlr.scu&5 the submittal schedule for the
final Sheridan Risk flssessrnent
-------
SITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OL-THOh:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££3
0£/££/8B
00£
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Pro.jc?ct Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
Li. S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Memorandum and Attachment
Meeting Summary, Sheridan Site Committee
requested the meeting to hand-deliver thr?
oraft Feasibility Study and present an
overview of the document, attached list c-f
attendees
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DRTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE;
PCCUMEINT TITLE:
0£/£6/8B
00 £
Roxanne Burkey, Information Center
U.S. EPfl Region VI
U.S. EPfi Region VI Site Filer.
Records Transmitted and Rec.-e?ipt
Re: Shr-pnent of groundwater samples for
the Sheridan Disposal Service Superfuml
r, r. t e
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
niJTHOR:
COMPANY/OGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
o£/£9/ee
001
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project- Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfi
Region VI
Correspondence
Discusses subrnittal date for revised Source
Control Risk Assessment for the Sheridan
site
75
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINA;_
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY :
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££6
03/16/88
007
Bill Harmon, Chief, Site Policy £ Guidance
Branch
U. S. EPA Region VI
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfunri
Enforcement Section,, U.S. EPP Region VI
Memorandum and Attachment
Evaluation of the potential relevant and
appropriate soil cloanup criteria;
attachment regarding PCBs-Eackground and
Current Interpretations revised 0£/£l/flfl
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT
03/17/86
002
Larry E'. Feldcamp, Chairman, Sheridan Giie
Steering Committee
Baker S Bottr,
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfuno
Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Corres pondence
Re: Sheridan Disposal Service oversight on
Cost Documentation as required by the
Administrative Order on Consent
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££3
03/18/88
00£
Jerry Greenhaum, P.E., Review Team Project
Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Transmittal of draft review comments on the?
Source Control Feasibility Study prepared
by ERM-Southwest, Inc.
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
££9
03/21/88
131
Greg Tipple, Remedial 3 nvest i gat ion Unit
Head, Super-fund Section, Hazardous and
Solid Waste Division
Texas Water Commission
Ruth L. Izrael), Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Rei'CO.OTi VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Transmitted of thf? current State Sur^ece
Water Quality Standards and proposed Statp
Surface Ulster Duality Regulations
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PCC-UMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
CDMPFiNY/ftSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
PCC'jyEWT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
os/££/ee
700
Michatl L. Daggett, Chief, Organic Lab
Sect aon
U.S. EPA Region VI, Houston Branch
Jo Ann Miller, U.S. EPA Region VI
CLP Data Review
Ccvse No. 6333: Organic Samoles FG 01£, ITG
OJ.7 and FG 018; EPA split sample dtta -
OA/QC Documentation (Available for review
«?/f. U. S, EPA Region VI, Dallas, Texas)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOa.lKF.N7 TITLE:
£31
03/E4/68
5£0
Staff Consultants
ETC - Tax icon
Jo Ann Miller, U.S.
Laboratory Reports
Cat>e No. 6770: Part
sample data - QA/OC
(Available for review at
VI, Dallas, Texas)
EPA Region VI
I of II; EPA split
Doc urnent at i on
U.S. EPA Region
77
-------
SITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
VXD Oe£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT. DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£3£
03/£4/88
£61
Staff Consultants
Unspeci f ied
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Laboratory Data
Case No. £770: Part II of II; EPA split
sample data - RA/G1C Documentation
(Av'aMable for review at U.S. EPA Region
VI, Dallas, TX)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
l;Or:LiMET.Nrr TITLE:
£33
04/06/ea
033
Lerry Wright, Chief, Superfund Enforcement
Sect ion
U.S. EPA Region VI
John Cotterell, Site Project Manager,
Sheridan Bite Steering Committee
Correspondence and Attachments
Re; Ft A**; completion of the review of the
draft Feasibility Study submitted on
f'eL'n.u-1-y £'£, 1306; which includes comments
that EPfi would like addressed in the
re? visa on
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUKEE? T" cfiGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENTS
DOC'JMZNT TYPE:
DDCl.'rtcINT TITLE:
£34
04/10/BB
003
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Ret ion VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Transmit tal for Sheridan Site? Committee
"•"ethnical Status Report for March 1986
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY;
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£35
04/11/88
037
Greg Tipple, Remedial Investigat ion Unit
Head, Super-fund Section, Hazardous & Solid
Waste Division
Texas Water Commission
Ruth L. Izrae-Ji, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Applicable or Relevant and Approriate
Requirements received from the Texas Air
Or.int ro 1 Bosrd, Ra i 1 road Cornm i ss > on of
Texas, and Texas Dept. of Health; and,
comments on the Source Control FS
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£36
04/12/88
O02
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager-,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPf
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Transmittal of Results of Additional
Evaporation System Soil Sampling dated
02/01/B8
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£37
04/12/BB
001
Donald W. Beaver, Work Assignment Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Transrnittal of review comments on the
"Baseline Risk Assessment, Sheridan
Disposal Services Site" prepared by
ERM-Southwest, Inc., dated 03/14/88
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL.
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OSS132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PflGESi
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£38
O4/16/88
004
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPft Region VI
John Cotterell, Site Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Correspondence
Re: Meet i rig held to discuss the questions
and Agency comments on the Source Control
Feasibility Study, and to allow EPPl to
restate the major areas of deficiency of
the draft Feasibility Study
£39
04/2B/8B
009
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S, EPA Region VI
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Summery
Baseline Risk Assessment Comments for the
Sheridan Disposal Service site Draft of
March 14, 1988; Revised Comments for April,
198C
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£40
05/04/88
003
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI File
Memorandum end Attachment
Meeting summary; purpose of meeting was to
discuss the revision of the Source Control
Feasibility Study, attached list of
attendees
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£41
05/06/86
001
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert Stewart, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue?
Corre? pond ence
EPA concluded that proposed additional
testing, a=. requested, is not necessary to
complete the Feasibility Study or to select
the remedial alternative
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
242
os/io/ee
007
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager-
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Cover letter for data summaries from the
Sheridan Disposal Site Phase 1 and Phase £
Biodecradation Studies
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£43
05/10/88
O01
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ed Earth, HWERL
Memorandum
Transmittal of full results of PRPs Phase I
program and partial results from their
Phase II program regarding sludge
biotreatabi 1 ity testirig in batch reactors:
request for technical assistance
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PACES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£44
05/11/88
002
Dr. Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Mansper,
U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Comments from review of the laboratory
results of the stabilisation ana solvent
extraction testing raw data packages
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR r
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£45
05/1£/8S
001
Ruth L. Izrae?]i, Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Cover letter for copy of summary table
referenced in the Risk Assessment Comment's
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£46
05/1B/68
ooe
Kenneth A. Dostal, Environmental Engineer
U.S. EPA, Office of Research and
Development, Water Engineering Research
Laboratory
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum
Comments on the "Phase I Biological
Treatability Report for Source Control
Feasibility Study"
8£
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062133147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£47
O5/19/88
002
John M. Dotterel 1, P. E. , Project Manager
Sheridan Site Dammittee
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Technical information and details for the
proposed treatability studies to provide
support for the Source Control Feasibility
Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£48
05/20/68
006
Douglas A. Austin, Manager—Business
Development
Resources Conservation Company
Jerry Greenbaum, Jacobs Engineering Group
Inc.
Correspondence
Information regarding various lagoon
closure options at Sheridan Disposal Site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£49
OS/23/66
005
Robert T. Stewart, Vice Chairman
Sheridan Site Committee
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Request for additional meetings with U.S.
EPA Region VI; plan to submit revised
interim Feasibility Study by 06/20/88;
attached schedule to perform additional
stabilization and biological studies
e:
-------
SITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£50
05/24/88
002
Fred Reitrnen, Toxicologist, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum
Discussion of soil clean-up levels for PCBs
at the Sheridan Disposal Site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
05/2B/BB
001
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Reyion VI
Correspondence
Cover letter for preliminary workplan
prepared by Davis L. Ford and Radian
Cor porat i on for a B i o 3. og i ca 1 Treat ab i 1 i t y
Study; request for a meeting at Radian
Corporation during the week of 06/06/86
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGESi
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:- .
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£5£
O&/01/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Memorandum
Discusses 05/16/88 meeting regarding
conclusions of the biodegradation studies
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£53
06/03/88
001
Unspeci fieti
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Meeting Attendance List
List of Attendees at the Sheridan Site
Dispute Resolution Meeting Number 1 on
OS/03/68
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£?';•
06/06/88
00£
Larry D» Wright, Chief, Super-fund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert Stewart, Sheridan Site Committee
Cha irrnan, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
Correspondence
Response to 05/£3/68 letter concerning
Feasibility Study; meeting scheduled for
0&/0£/88 to resolve dispute concerning
necessity of conducting additional
treatibi1 ity testing before final ing the F'i
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
06/06/88
388
Edward R. Bates, Physical Scientist
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ruth L. Isr-aeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attached Report
Draft Report on the RCC B.E.S.T. Processes
as Evaluated During a £4-Hour Test Period
at the General Refining Site near Savanah,
Georg ia
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
RDMINISTRftTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06S1SE147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
ftUTHOR:
COMPRN'Y/fiGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£56
06/07/88
OOS
Sheridan Site Steering Committee
Unspecified
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfi
Region VI
Out 1ine
Outline? of Sludge and Soil Sampling Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ftUTHOR:
COMPfiNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£57
06/03/88
001
John M. Cottere11, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Correspondence
Transmittal of a complete copy of the
Interim Source Control Feasibility Study
revised in response to EPft's comments
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PfiGES:
fllJTHDR:
COMPfiNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENTi
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£58
06/09/88
002
Norrna J. Goldman,
Unspecified
Ellen Greeney, U.
Correspondence
Initial monthly report of the community
relations activity
Principal
5. EPfl Region VI
DC
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£59
O&/1Q/BB
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U. S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Trip Report
Meeting with John M. Cotterell, Sheridan
Site Committee to discuss EPA's comments on
the biological treatability study and to
rc?ach agreement in general terms
DOCUMENT NUMBERi
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYP'E:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£60
0&/10/6B
007
Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy, Ph.D.,
Env i ronrnent a 1 Eng i neer
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Conso1i dat ed comment s on the Sheridan site
Work Plan for additional biological
treatability study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£61
05/13/68
O03
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E.,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence
Transmittal of a copy of
the draft Biodegradation
Sheridan site
Project Manager,
Agency comments on
Work Plan for the
87
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062152147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
06/ee/SB
005
Donald W. Beaver, Ph.D., Senior
Geohydrolog ist
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Cor resplendence
Concerns review of the Baseline Rick
Assessment prepared by the Sheridan Site
Comrn i 11 ee
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
fiUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
S&3
06/29/88
004
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Transrnittal of attached Comments on
Feasibility Study dated 06/09/88
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£64
O6/30/88
003
Jerry Greenbaurn
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
U.S. EPA Region VI
Comment s
Comments on Phase £ Stabilization Testing
Work Plan 91-19 Sheridan Site, 06/21/88
p. p.
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT, DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
ftlJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£65
06/30/88
Oil
Jerry Greenbaurn, Review Team Project
Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeii, Remedial Project Manager,
Super fund Enforcement Section, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Transmittal of the attached consolidated
comments on the Interim Source Feasibility
Study, Chapter 6 and Appendices ft,D,E,F,and
G,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£66
07/01/88
010
Raj opal Krishnamoorthy, Ph. D. ,
Env i ronrnent a 1 Eng i neer
Jacobs Engineering, Inc.
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
CommentE
Comments on the Biotreatrnent Interim
Feasibility Study for the Sheridan site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£67
07/01/88
003
Fred Reitman, Toxicologist
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Comments
Comments on the Revised Sheridan Site Risk
Assessment, prepared for the Sheridan Site
Steering Committee
89
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FI.MAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06E132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DP.TE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£68
07/01/68
004
Staff
Sheridan Site Committee
Residents of Hernpstead, TX
Fact Sheet
Sheridan Site Fact Sheet; provides
overview of the Sheridan Site
an
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£G9
07/07/ee
001
Chris Tanner
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeii, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Transrnittal of leaching procedures that
were identified as candidates for the
n-ubject studies
€
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£70
07/08/66
019
Joe Jowarnicky/Alex Lernmon
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Comments
Evaluation and Comments on Feasibility
Study Dated 06/09/88 prepared for the
Sheridan Site Committee by ERM-Southwest,
Inc.
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£71
07/06/86
002
Bheryl Quinn, Project Coordinator
Unspecified
Ellen Greeney, U.S. EPA Reg 3 on VI
Correspondence
Discusses community relations activities
conducted during the month of June 1988 for
the Sheridan site
DOCUMENT NUMBER
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£7£
07/06/88
014
&teff Consultants
Metcalf ft Eddy, Inc. / Jacobs Engineering
Group, Inc.
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files and Sheridan
Bite Steering Committee
Draft Report
Evaluation and Commentsr on Chapter fc of the
Interim Source Feasibility Study dated June
9. 1988, prepared for the Sheridan Disposal
Service Site Committee by ERM-Southwest
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY :
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£73
07/13/88
054
Douglas A. Austin, Director-Business
Development
Resources Conservation Company
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Information regarding B.E.S.T. Process and
its possible application at the Sheridan
site
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£74
07/14/BB
001
Unspecified
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPfl Re pi on VI
Meeting Attendance
List of attendees
07/14/88
Site File
List
from Sheridan meet ing
on
DOCUMENT NUMBER]
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
07/15/88
001
John Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Draft Ground Water Migration
Management Remedial Investigation Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£76
07/18/88
O01
Unspecified •
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Meeting Attendance List
List of attendees at Sheridan site meeting
on 07/IB/88
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OC2132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
fll.lTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£77
07/25/88
001
Rajagopal Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D.,
En v i ronrnent a 1 Eng i neer
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager.
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPft
Region VI
Correspondence
Transmittal of comments on revised Work
Plan for Sheridan Biological Treatabi1ity
Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
c'70
07/25/88
001
John M. Dotterel 1, P. E. , Project Manager-
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence w/o referenced enclosure
Sheridan Disposal Services Site - Risk
Assessment ; transrnittal of rnarked-up pages
of the Risk Assessment, direct Y^esponse to
Jacobs Engineering comments, and request
for- timely review of modifications
DOCUMENT NUMBERj
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
DOMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£79
07/26/88
002
Chris Tanner, P. E.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Transmittal of draft "Work Plan for Phase
Stabilisation Study"
93
-------
SITE NflME:
SITE NUMBER:
flDMINISTRflTIVE RECORD INDEX
FINftL
SHERIDflN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PftGESi
ttUTHDR:
COMPflNY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPEi
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£00
07/2&/88
003
Chris Tanner, P.E.
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager.,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfi
Region VI
Correspondence and attachment
Justification of Dike Borings at the
Sheridan site, attached location map for
dike samples
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPflNY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£31
07/26/BB
001
B.C. Robison, D. V. M. , Ph.D., Project
Toxicologist
E RM-So ut h west, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section^ U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Correspondence
Rationale for the use of 4.34 as the
carcinogenic potency factor
i
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
PUTHOR:
COMPflNY/flGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£S£
07/27/88
OOS
Robert T. Stewart
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
Pamela Phillips, Assistant Regional Counsel
Correspondence
Confirmation of agreement reached by EPfl
and the Sheridan Site Committee on 07/18/68
regarding PCB levels and a double
1iner/leachate collection system
94
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£83
07/27/88
OQ£
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-Fund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Memorandum and Attachment
Biotreatabi1ity Study Progress Meeting on
07/c.'l/ee and attached list of attendees
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£84
OB/03/88
00£
Jerry Greenbaum, Review Team Project
Manager
Jacobs. Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Comments on the Liner Systems design
section of the rnsrked-up Sheridan
Feasibility Study Report submitted to EPA
on 07/£5/88
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£85
O8/04/88
UUJ
Unspecified
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Sketches
Sketches from ERM-Southwest, Inc. of RCRA
double liner system design
95
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
886
06/06/88
003
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Super-fund
Enforcement Section
U. B. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Sheridan Feasibility Study (FS) Conditional
Approval; approval of FS pending revision
of document to reflect changes transmitted
by this letter
£87
08/09/88
002
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Subrnittal of EPA's- formal comments, on the
revised Biological Treatability Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ABENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£86
08/09/66
005
Larry B.
Stewart,
Sheridan
Robert E
Administrator,
Correspondence
and Robert T.
Feldcarnp, Chairman,
Vice Chairman
Site Committee
Layton, Jr., P, E. , Regional
U.S. EPA Region VI
and Attachment
Sheridan Superfund Site; proposal of the
Sheridan Site Committee to undertake
appropriate remedial action at the Sheridan
site
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Q6£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT, DATE:
NUMBER OF PPQES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE.:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£89
08/10/88
O31
Michael L. Daggett, Chief* Organic Lab
Section, Houston Branch
U. S. EPA Region VI
Dave Cook, U.S. EPfi Region VI
CLP Date Review
Case No. 9935: Organic samples FH-907 and
FH-90fi
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES,
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£90
08/15/68
009
Unspecifieri
Unspecified
Ruth Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Comments
Ground Water Migration Management Reniedie.1
Investigation Review Comments
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR.:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£91
08/££/ee
00£
Larry D. Wright, Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Sheridan Risk Assessment; aknowledgeraent of
incorporation of EPA requested revisions
97
-------
SITE NAME:
&ITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
OUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£9£
OB/£4/BB
003
Robert T. Stewart, Vice Chairman
Sheridan Site Committee
Larry D. Wrightt Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Sheridan Site Feasibility Study;
respondents to Administrative Oroer invoke?
dispute resolution provisions
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/flBENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£93
03/01/86
00£
Rajagopal Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D.,
Environmental Engineer
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Sheridan Site Comments - Experimental
Design of Phase III Biotreatrnent Study
i
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£94
O9/05/BB
00£
Robert T. Stewart, Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Site Committee
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
Larry Wright, Chief, Super-fund Enforcement
Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Sheridan Site Administrative Order on
Consent; Doc. No. CERCLA VI-01087; requests
F.PA consider use of Alternative Dispute
Resolution ("ADR") techniques
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofi£132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
flUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£95
09/06/88
001
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Cornrni11ee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attached Reports
Transmittal of the revised Interim Source
Control Feasibility Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
flUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£9£
09/06/88
004
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site File
Memorandum to File w/o Attachment
First Stabilisation Studies Progress
Meeting 08/31/88; purpose of meeting was to
describe progress of the stabilisation
jr-t ud i es
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHORi
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£97
Q9/07/88
O03
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Biotreat merit Progress meeting - 08/30/88;
Summarisation of the results of meeting to
discuss progress of the Sheridan
Biotreatrnent studies being conducted by the
Radian lab
99
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE: NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£38
09/07/68
003
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager,
Sheridan Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Sheridan Work Plan for Stabilisation Study;
transrnittal of EPA's comments; comments do
not imply approval of the proposed studies
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES!
ftlJTHQR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
£33
09/1E/B8
001
Bennett Stokes for Pamela Phillips, Senior
Attorney
Ll. S. EPA Region VI
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P.E., Regional
Administrator, U.S. EPA Region VI
Memorandum
Sheridan Site Committee; Sheridan Site
Committee (SSC) has invoked the Dispute
Resolution Provision of its Remedial
Invest igat ion/Feasibi1ity Study
Administrative Order
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
300
09/18/88
00£
Pamela Phillips, Senior Attorney
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert Stewart, Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Site Committee
Correspondence w/o referenced enclosure
Administrative Order CERCLA VI-01-87,
Sheridan Dispute Resolution
100
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY!
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE;
301
09/13/88
O01
Edwin F. Berth, Environmental Engineer,
Stabilization Section, Risk Reduction
F.ng i neer i ng La bor at ory
U. S. EPA
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Long-Term Effectiveness of
Solidification/Stabilization of Oily Waste
DOCUMENT NUMBERi
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
302
09/21/88
002
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P. E. , Regional
Administrator
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert T. Stewart, Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Site Committee and Pain Phillips, ORC, U.S.
EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Dispute Resolution Procedures for
Sheridan Site Committee Conference
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES!
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
303
09/22/88
O05
Chris Tanner
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Interim Source Control Feasibility Study
Submittal; revised pages 4-1, 6-15, 6-17,
and 6-34
101
-------
SITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
304
09/23/88
006
Jerry Sreenbaurn, Senior Engineer
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Izrseli, Remedial Project Mansge-r,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Sheridan Disposal Site; Review of Interim
Control Feasibility Study Dated 09/06/88
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
ftlJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
305
09/27/88
002
Chris Tanner
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachment
Interim Source Control Feasibility Study
Submittal; Second Revision of page 4-1
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
306
09/28/88
012
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert Stewart, Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Site Committee
Correspondence and Attachment
Dispute Resolution; enclosure is the
factual explanation of EPA's position on
the outstanding dispute
1 0?
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062131'147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
307
09/26/ee
Oil
Robert T. Stewart
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Tr&nsrnittal of (1) Respondents' Statement
Regarding Dispute Raised By 05/06/88 Let ten*
of EPA, and (£') Attachment A - List of
Respondents
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
308
10/03/86
005
Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy, Ph.D.,
Envi ronment a1 Eng i neer
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Sampling for Sheridan Phase III
Biotr eat merit Study, Radian Corporation,
Austin, Texas, 09/30/88
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENTi
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
309
10/04/88
002
William A. Eckroade, Environmental
Engineer, Office of Waste Programs
Enforcement
U.S. EPA Headquarters
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum
Land Disposal Restrictions at Superfund
Sites
10:
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
310
10/04/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.9. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Filer,
Record of Communications
Re: Conversation with Paul De Percin, ORD,
concerning the Stabilisation Study/Haron
site Dernonst rat i on Pro j ect
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OP PflGESi
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY,
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE;
311
10/05/88
098
Robert Layton, Jr., Pamela Phillips, ORC,
Ruth L. Israeli, RPM, and Larry Wright,
Chief
U.S. EPA Region VI
Sheridan Site Committee and U.S. EPA Region
VI Site Files
Transcri pt
The transcript from the meeting held
between the Sheridan Site Committee, EPfl' <5
legal staff, and Enforcement staff to
resolve the disagreement regarding the
Consent Decree that was issued 0£/03/87
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
31£
10/10/88
00£
Sheryl A. Quinn, Project Coordinator
Sheridan Site Committee
Ellen Greeney, Community Relations
Coordinator, U, S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Summary of community relations activities
undertaken during 09/88 on behalf of the
Sheridan Disposal Site
104
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT,DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
313
10/ie/BB
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Land Ban Work Group, U.S. EPfl Region VI
Memorandum
Land Ban Applicability to Sheridan Site
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/flBENCV:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
314
10/12/88
001
Robert E. Layton,
Administrator
U.S. EPfl Region VI
Robert T. Stewart,
Bite Comrni11ee and
EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Resolution of Dispute Under
Sheridan Administrative Order,
CERCLA VI-01-87
Jr., P.E., Regional
Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Parn Phillips, ORC, U.S.
the
Docket
No.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
315
10/14/88
075
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager-
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Sheridan Disposal Services Site Ground
Water Migration Management Remedial
Investigation pages that were revised, as
indicated by RPM's comments
10!
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDP.N DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF' PflGES;
AUTHOR:
CQMPflNY/flSENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
Ford, John
Castaidi
Committee
M. Cotter-ell, and
and Radian
316
10/17/88
001
Dr. Davis L.
Dr. Frank J.
Sheridan Site
Corporat ion
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfunc' Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Memorandum
Re: Change in approach to Reactor Sampling
and finalysis
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF POSES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
317
10/17/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Enforcement Section
U. S. EPA Ret ion VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Trip Report
Re: Discussion with Dr. Castaldi, of
Radian Corporation concerning available
data on the biotreatnient bench-scale
studies
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
318
10/19/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Record of Communication
Re: Discussion of the Sheridan Disposal
Service site Risk Assessment Report, with
Philip Crocker, of the Water Management
Branch
1
106
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD QG£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
319
10/19/88
OOS
Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy, Ph.D.,
Environmental Engineer
Jacobs Engineering Group
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Officer,
Superfunri Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Corres pond ence
Re: Sampling for Sheridan Pnase II
Biotreatrnent Study, Radian Corporation,
Austin, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
3PO
10/26/88
003
Acting Regional Director, Region £
U.S. Department of the Interior
Regional Environmental Officer, USDI,
Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Memorandum
Preliminary Natural Resources Survey of DOI
Trust Responsibilities at the Sheridan
Disposal Service Site, Waller County, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PABES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
321
10/26/68
003
Fred A. Reitman, Toxicologist, Superfund
Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum and Attachment
Groundwater Risks for Sheridan Site Risk.
Assessment Appendix F
107
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FIN3L
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
322
11/01/6B
001
John M. Cottere]!, P. E. , Prcject Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Super-fund Enforcement Section, U.S. EDA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Sheridan Site Source Control
Feasibility Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
323
11/01/88
112
Staff Consultants
ERM-Southwest, Inc. for the Sheridan Site?
Cornrn i 11 ee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Filer,
Report
The revised Source Control Feasibility
Study for the Sheridan Disposal Service
site - Vol. I
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT*
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
324
11/01/88
174
Staff Consultants
ERM-Southwest, Inc. for the Sheridan Site
Committee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Report
The Source Control Feasibility Study for
the Sheridan Disposal Service site - Vol.
II
JOG
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06213E147
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PASES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
325
11/01/88
001
John Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Transmittr»l of eight copies of the
Sheridan Site Risk Assessment
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
3£6
11/01/88
£33
Staff Consultants
ERM-Southwest, Inc. for the Sheridan Site
Committee
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Report
The Baseline Risk Assessment for the
Sheridan Disposal Service Site in Waller
County, TX - Vol. I
DOCUMENT NUMBER!
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
387
11/01/88
328
Staff Consultants
ERM Southwest, Inc. for the Sheridan Site
Cornrn i 11 ee
U.S EPA Region VI Site Files
Report
The Baseline Risk Assessment for the
Sheridan Disposal Services Site in Waller
County, TX - Vol. II
-------
SITE NOME:
BITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06£13£'147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT. DOTE:
NUMBER OF' PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
3£8
11/02/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Record of Communication
Documentation of call from Paul de Percin,
Chemical Engineer, ORD, to discuss Hason
Stabilisation Study
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
f-HJTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
329
ii/07/ee
003
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Briefing Paper
Sheridan Disposal Services Proposed Plan
Briefing Paper
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
330
11/07/88
004
Ruth L. Izrseli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Trip Report
Re: Trip to Texas Water Commission to
discuss Sheridan proposed plan with TWC
officials
1 10
-------
SITE
BITE
NAME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 0£»£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
331
11/14/88
00£
Lou Barinka, Acting Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Section
LI. B. EPA Region VI
John Dotterel 1, Project Manager, Sheridsn
Site Committee
Correspondence
Re: Sheridan Source Control Feasibility
Study and Risk Assessment dated November 1,
19GB
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT PATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
11/14/86
013
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Filer,
Memorandum
Re: Attached summary paper on facilitated
transport for the Sheridan Disposal Service
site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCYi
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
333
11/15/88
002
Roger Meacharn, Office of Public Awareness
U.S. EPA Region VI
Residents of Hernpstead, Waller County, TX
News Release
Discussion of the possible remedial
alternatives that the U.S. EPA is
considering for use, in cleaning up the
hazardous waste contamination at the
Sheridan Disposal Service site
1 1 1
-------
SITE NftME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DflTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
334
11/16/68
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager-,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Reqion VI
U.S. EPP. Region VI Site Files
Record of Communication
Documentation of call with John Cottere11
of the Sheridan Site Committee, to discuss
dike soils requiring remediation
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
11/Sl/ee
001
Walter J. Starbuck, III
Resident of Brookshire, TX
Ellen Breeney, Community Relations
Coordinator, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Public comment regarding the November ££
Hearing on the Sheridan Disposal Service
site - Superfund
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PflSES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
336
n/££/ee
003
Dr. Robert E. Frulla, Senior Vice President
International Technology Corporation
Ellen D. Breeney, Community Relations
Coordinator, U.S. EPft Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
ITC's comments on the remedies that they
can provide effectively for the Sheridan
Disposal Service site
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD OGS13E147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
337
ii/££/ee
008
Ellen Greeney, Community Relations
Coordinator
U.S. EPA Region VI
Residents of Hernpstead, Waller County, TX
Project Update
Superfund Project Update for the Sheridan
Disposal Service site Proposed Plan of
Act i on
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
338
11/27/88
001
Richard ft. Kemp, Editor, The Waller County
News-Citizen
Great Northwest Publishing Company
Ruth Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Branch, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Mr. Kemp's comments regarding the Sheridan
Disposal Service proposed plans to
neutralise contaminants at the site
DOCUMENT NUMBERi
DOCUMENT DftTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
339
11/SB/68
001
William A. Eckroade, Environmental
Engineer, Office of Waste Programs
Enforcement
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Branch, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: RCRA LDR and ARAR at the Sheridan
Disposal Service site, in Hernpstead, TX
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE
SITE
NAME:
NUMBER:
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
340
11/29/8S
001
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
LI. B. EPA Region VI
John Cotterell, Project Officer, Sheridan
Bite Committee
Correspondence
Re: Sheridan Disposal Service site Ground
Water Migration Management Remedial
Investigation Revised Pages
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DfiTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
341
11/30/88
003
Rajagopal Krishnarnoorthy,
Environmental Engineer
Jacobs Engineering Group
Ruth L. Izraeli, Remedial
Ph. D.
Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPfl
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Sheridan site, WA No, 1B3, Phase III
Biotreatability Study 90 Day Sampling
Activity, November £9, 1988
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PflGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPflNY/ftGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT- TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
34?.
12/01/88
00£
Larry D. Wright, Acting Chief, Superfund
Enforcement Branch
U.S. EPA Region VI
James 0. Young, Acting Regional Director,
Region £, U.S. Department of the Interior
Correspondence
Re: Preliminary Natural Resources Survey
of DOI Trust Responsibilities at the
Sheridan Disposal Service site
114
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ftDMlNISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSflL SERVICE
TXD 06£13c'147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT}
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
343
12/06/88
013
Mike Mitchell, FIT Geologist
Ecology & Environment, Inc.
David Winernan, Regions! Project Officer,
Ecology & Environment, Inc.
Memorandum
October 4, 1986 Sampling Inspection,
Sheridan Disposal Service Hernpstead, TX
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
344
IS/07/88
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Trip Report
Trip taken to discuss the latest results of
the bi©treatment bench-scale studies
conducted on behalf of the Sheridan
Disposal Service Committee
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
345
1S/09/8B
001
John Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPft
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Enclosure of two copies of the Phase £
Stabilization Study
1 1 «=;
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD Ofe£13£147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
346
l£/09/88
£83
Sa Ba Lee,
Ph.D., Chris Tanner, Project
Manager,
U. S. EPA
Manager, and Douglas S. Diehl, President
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
Ruth Izraeli, Remedial Project
Super fund Enforcement Section,
Region VI
Report
The Phase II Stabilisation Study Report
the Sheridan Disposal Service site
for
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
347
1£709/86
002
Donald W. Beaver, Senior Hydrologist
Jacobs Engineering Group
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPft
Region VI
Briefing Paper
Sheridan Disposal Service Proposed Plan
Briefing Paper
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
340
l£/13/88
001
Dave Winernan, FIT,
Officer, Hazardous
U.S. EPft Region VI
Brian Burgess, Acting Chief,
Assessment Section, U.S. EPA Region VI
Mernor and urn
Potential Hazardous Waste Site Sampling
Inspection Report
Regional Project
Waste Section
Site
Region
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
349
12/14/88
002
John M. Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager-
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial P'roject Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence
Re: Comments submitted regarding Sheridan
Disposal Service site by International
Technology Corporat ion
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
350
12/14/88
007
John M, Cotterell, P. E. , Project Manager-
Sheridan Site Committee
Ellen D. Greeney, Community Relations
Coordinator, U.S. EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Sheridan Site Committee's comments on the?
alternatives for source control remediation
of the Sheridan Disposal Service site
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
351
12/15/88
160
Lab Personnel
Lancaster Laboratories, Inc.
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Lab Data Report
Item 1: Final Leachate Ph - 1988
Qualification Manual
117
-------
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062 132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
352
12/15/68
013
John M. Cottere11, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ellen D. Greeney, Community Relations
Coordinator, U.S. EPfl Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Re: Two stabilization articles referenced
in Sheridan Bite? Committee Comments
December 14, 1388 Letter
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
353
12/21/86
098
John M. Cotterell, P.E., Project Manager
Sheridan Site Committee
Ruth Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Report
Chain-of-Custody documentation relating
Sheridan Disposal Service Site analyses
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
354
12/22/86
028
Allen J. Medine, Ph.D., Work Assignment
Manager
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Ruth L Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Branch, U. S. EPA
Region VI
Correspondence and Attachments
Final Review of the Phase II Stabilization
Study
118
-------
plan. During the public comment period, there were comments and ques-
tions regarding the following:
Comment jQ: What types of chemicals are being considered for stabiliza-
tion?
EPA Response: The Sheridan Site Committee has conducted small-scale tests
on a wide variety of lime and silicate-type materials. However, the
specific material will be determined during the design phase.
Comment 12: Biotreatment has not been comrnercially applied on this
scale and scope.
EPA Response; Biotreatment, such as activated sludge processes, have been
used on a commercial scale to degrade organics in municipal and industrial
effluent. Biotreatment has been successfully demonstrated in a field-
scale application at the French Limited site in Crosby, Texas, which
contains similar wastes to those at Sheridan.
Comment #3: The estimated cost for incineration is too high and the
project can be completed in one year using a high throughput incinerator.
EPA Response: The conceptual design costs for incineration used in the
Feasibility Study are within the required range for estimated accuracy (+50
percent to -30 percent) and the calculated cost per cubic yard is actually
low when compared to the range of costs discussed in the 1986-1987 survey
of selected firms in the commercial hazardous waste industry, prepared
by the ICF corporation in 1988.
The design concepts and costs developed in the Feasibility Study may be
used to show that a one year incineration period, if mechanically and
logistically feasible, would actually cost more than the 2.7 year period
used in the incineration alternative.
Comment #4: The incinerator ash can be safely disposed of on site
without special precautions.
EPA Response; In order to be safely disposed of on-site, it was assumed
in the F5 that the ash would have to meet the substantive requirements
of RCRA Delisting which is a very time-consuming and eventually costly
process. It was determined that off-site disposal would be less expensive
and more efficient than disposing of the waste on site and satisfying
Delisting requirements.
Comment 15: The hazards of the site are exaggerated and far too much
money is being spent on the site.
EPA Response; We do not believe the hazards have been exaggerated.
Unacceptable long-term risks are associated with the chemicals that are
present at the site. These chemicals are slowly moving downward toward
the ground water and outward toward the Brazos River. Exposure to these
chemicals could increase the likelihood of contracting cancer or cause
other harmful effects.
-------
We disagree that the costs are excessive because Superfund requires that
the selected remedy be cost-effective. That is, when comparing
alternatives which achieve equal protection of human health and the
environment, the least expensive alternative should be selected.
Comment 16 ; A more suitable remedy would be to fill in the area and
provide funds to the county to monitor the site.
EPA Response; EPA is mandated to provide long-term protection of public
health, welfare and the environment and reduce waste toxicity, mobility and
volume whenever possible. Merely, filling in the area does not adequately
accomplish these statuatorily required goals.
Comment 17; Stabilization should be the preferred remedy for the
snendan site because it is fully protective of human health and the
environment, and has demonstrated advantages over other alternatives in
terms of short-term effectiveness, implementability and cost.
EPA Response; In order to satisfy the requirements of section 121 of
Th"e~ Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, EPA has determined that
remedial alternatives must be evaluated using nine criteria for comparison,
including Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment. When
evaluating the alternatives in terms of their overall protect!veness, EPA
determined that Stabilization is protective of human health and the environ-
ment, but that it is not as protective in the long-term as other alternatives,
such as Biotreatment, which will destroy essentially all mobile organic
contaminants in the waste.
Biotreatment is the least expensive alternative which will significantly
reduce waste mobility, toxicity and volume and essentially eliminate the
source of contaminants to ground water. Unlike Stabilization, Biotreat-
ment will result in the destruction of all mobile organic compounds which
could migrate into the environment if the stabilization or containment
system were to fail.
EPA agrees with the Commenter that Stabilization is readily implementable
and that its short-term costs are lower than those of Biotreatment.
However, EPA is required to consider potential replacement costs of the
remedy, should it fail, in addition to capital and operational costs. The
replacement costs for Stabilization are estimated to be considerably
greater than those for Biotreatment. Further, the potential for remedy
failure is greater for Stabilization since, as is described in Section
4.3 of this Record of Decision, it received a lower rating for Long-term
Permanence and Effectiveness than Biotreatment. Finally, cost 1s only a
primary consideration when comparing equally protective alternatives
which is not true of Biotreatment and Stabilization.
EPA disagrees that Stabilization has demonstrated advantages over Biotreat-
ment in terms of Short-term Effectiveness. Although Stabilization may be
accomplished somewhat more quickly, it will release greater volatile
organic emissions than Biotreatment, and those emissions will not be
controlled. Whereas, Biotreatment will be conducted in a closed system
with emissions controls.
-------
Of the remaining six criteria for alternative evaluation, Biotreatment
received a superior rating to Stabilization in all six comparisons.
Comment No. 8
Stabilization studies have been conducted which demonstrate that there
are at least two commercially available stabilization technologies that will
effectively immobilize contaminants in the Sheridan site waste and be
protective of human health and the environment.
EPA Response; The results of the site-specific stabilization studies do
not demonstrate that all contaminants are effectively immobilized. The
studies show that the stabilization process still allows migration of
select contaminants, particularly benzene. In addition, the studies did
not attempt to further evaluate the long-term stability and protectiveness
of the stabilization by conducting other tests such as sequential leaching,
freeze-thaw and wet-dry tests. However, no conclusive data is currently
available on the long-term effectiveness of stabilizing high organic
wastes such as those at Sheridan and validated test methods to address
long-term effectiveness have not been fully developed. A technical evalu-
ation of the Phase 2 Stabilization Study submitted by the commenter for
EPA consideration, is included in the site Administrative Record.
Comment No. 9: Recent studies on similiar wastes to those at Sheridan
demonstrate that the Stabilization alternative would be protective of
human health and the environment.
EPA Response; The two references (Evans and Pancoski were authors in
each of the papers) cited in suppport of this comment do not demostrate
that stabilization will be protective of human health and the environment
at the Sheridan site. In the paper by Evans, LaGrega, Pancoski and
Raymond (1988), it should be noted that the wastes were not similar to
those at Sheridan and did not contain significant levels of volatile
organics. In contrast, the Sheridan waste contains well over a thousand
times greater concentrations of volatiles such as benzene, toluene and
ethyl benzene than the wastes used in the study.
Regardless of the differences in waste type, the referenced stabilization
study has several potential problems with high organic content of the
leachate and overall strength. Organics 1n the study were leached from
the stabilized mass as indicated by organic levels in the leachate which
exceeded 200 mg/1. However, these organics could not be quantified in
the study since the largest organic fraction was found in an area of
unresolved peaks in the GC/MS analysis. Further, approximately 90 percent
of the compressive strengths tested in the study were less than 40 psi.
Therefore, the stabilized wastes would not meet recommended criteria
(Cullinane et a!., 1986/EPA/540/2-86/001, pers. comm. of Allan Medine,
Jacobs Engineering with C. Wiles, EPA, Cincinnati).
-------
P
P
In the second referenced paper, Alther, Evans and Pancoski (1988), the
authors did not evaluate the effectiveness of stabilizing mixed wastes
such as those at Sheridan, but performed a Free Swell Test using
Individual organic compounds. The Free Swell Test was essentially a
volume change observation from applying a particular treatment. Results
were used to infer the degree of sorption of the compound. However, the
treated materials were not tested for Teachability to verify the degree
of sorption.
Finally, the conclusions of the second paper, which references the first
paper provided by the commenter, states that some "preliminary success in
stabilizing organic hazardous wastes with organically modified clays
has been achieved in the laboratory, but further analysis is necessary."
This limited success in the laborotory using dissimiliar materials to
those at Sheridan cannot be extrapolated to be indicative of the long-
term protection of human health and the environment at the Sheridan site.
-------
SITE NAME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 06213S147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
i£/£-B/ee
001
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Memorandum
Re: Meeting that was requested by Sheridan
Site Committee to allow them to further
discuss stabilization
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
35G
1S/E9/88
030
Ruth L. Israeli, Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Enforcement Section
U.E. EPA Region VI
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
ROD
The Record of Decision for the Sheridan
Disposal Service Superfund site, in
Hempstead, Waller County, TX, which
discusses the remedial alternative?
(biotreatment) that EPA has selected
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
357
Undated
007
Unspecified
Texas Water Commission
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Summary
Site Remedial Action report for Sheridan
Disposal Service, Inc.; Solid Waste
Registration No. 39007
119
-------
SITE NOME:
SITE NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD QGE132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
358
Undated
00£
Robert E. Layton, Jr., P. E. , Regional
Administrator
U.S. EPA Region VI
Robert T. Stewart,
Site Committee and
EPA Region VI
Correspondence
Dispute Resolution Procedures for Sheridan
Site Committee Conference
Vice Chairman, Sheridan
Pamela Phillips, U.S.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
359
Undated
026
Staff Consultants
Hold That River, A Subsidiary of Gulf
Applied Technologies
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Report
Brochure on Hold That River's Erosion
Control Prevention & Protection Services
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
360
Undated
107
Staff Consultants
ERM-Southwest, Inc.
U.S. EPA Region VI Site Files
Report
The Draft Ground Water Migration Management
Remedial Investigation Report for Sheridan
Disposal Service dated 07/15/68
120
-------
r
SITE
SITE
NOME:
NUMBER:
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
FINAL
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICE
TXD 062132147
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
DOCUMENT. DOTE:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/AGENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE i
DOCUMENT TITLE:
361
Undated
004
Torn Kearns, Environmental Duality
Specialist
Texas Department of Water Resources
U.S. EPfl Region VI Site Files
Pre1i mi nary Assessment
Potential Hazardous Waste Site
Identification and Preliminary
for Sheridan Disposal Service
Assessment
DOCUMENT NUMBER;
DOCUMENT DATE:
NUMBER OP PAGES;
AUTHOR:
COMPANY/ABENCY:
RECIPIENT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
Undated
002
Fred Reitman, Toxicolegist, Superfund
Oklahoma/New Mexico Section
U.S. EPA Region VI
Ruth Izraeli, Remedial Project Manager,
Superfund Enforcement Section, U.S. EPA
Region VI
Memorandum
Re: Bioavailability of PCB from Solid
Matri x
AGENCY
DALLAS, TEXAS
121
-------
APPENDIX C
Sheridan Disposal Services
Community Relations Responsiveness Summary
This Community Relations Responsiveness Summary has been prepared to
provide written responses to comments submitted regarding the proposed
plan of action at the Sheridan Superfund site. The summary is divided
into two sections:
Section I: Background of Community Involvement and Concerns.
This section provides a brTef history of community interest and
concerns raised during the remedial planning activities at the
Sheridan site.
Section II: Summary of Major Comments Received. The comments
are summarized and EPA7* responses are provided.
I. Background of Community Involvement and Concerns
In general, there has been a long history of citizen awareness of the
Sheridan Disposal site. There was a high level of concern in the early
1970's when incineration at the site resulted in air emissions that
apparently disturbed people living within a 7-mile radius of the site.
A citizens' group, the Committee for a Clean Waller County, submitted a
petition of 500+ signatures to the Texas Water Quality Board in 1971
calling for closure of the Sheridan
------- |