EPA-600/3-76-085
July 1976
                                      257 512
Ecological Research Series
                   CHEMICAL CHARACTER
                            OF  MODEL AEROSOLS


-------
                 RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency,  have been  grouped  into five series  These  five broad
categories were established to facilitate further development and application of
environmental technology. Elimination of traditional giouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The five series are.

     1    Environmental Health Effects Research
     2    Environmental Protection Technology
     3    Ecological Research
     4    Environmental Monitoring
     5    Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series This series
describes research  on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and  animal
species, and materials Problems are assessed for their long- and short-term
influences. Investigations include formation, transport, and  pathway studies to
determine the fate of pollutants and their effects This work provides the technical
basis for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms
in the aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                     EPA-600/3-76-085
                                     July 1976
          CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION
              OF MODEL AEROSOLS
                      by
W. E. Schwartz, G. D. Mendenhall, P. W. Jones,
C. J. Riggle, A. P. Graffeo, and D. F. Miller
          Battelle Memorial Institute
          Columbus, Ohio  43201
               Grant No. 801174
                Project Officer

             Ronald K. Patterson
  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Division
   Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711
  ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES RESEARCH LABORATORY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA  27711

-------
                              DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Sciences
Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  and approved
for publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                   ii

-------
                               ABSTRACT





Model aerosols were generated from the individual hydrocarbons, toluene



and 1-heptene, by irradiation under simulated atmospheric conditions in



the presence of NO , or NO /S09.  The reactions were carried out in a
                  X       X   £•

      3
17.3 m  environmental chamber.  The collected aerosols were subjected to



analysis by mass spectrometry and chromatographic techniques, both with



and without chemical derivatization.  Polyfunctional oxidation products,



including quinones and carboxylic acid, were tentatively identified in the



toluene aerosol.  The 1-heptene filtered aerosol was shown to contain con-



densation products from different 1-heptene molecules.  Tentative identifi-



cation of a number of vapor-phase species was accomplished in both systems.



The health effects of the atmospheric oxidation products from hydrocarbons



is discussed.
                                   iii

-------
                           CONTENTS
ABSTRACT	    iii

LIST OF FIGURES	     v

LIST OF TABLES	     vi

SECTIONS

I   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 	     1

II  INTRODUCTION	     2

III BACKGROUND	     3

IV  METHODS AND PROCEDURES	     7

     A. Smog Chamber Characteristics	     7
     B. Smog-Chamber Cleanup	     8
     C.  Aerosol Generation, Monitoring and Collection.  .     9
     D.  Collection and Analysis of Organic Vapor Samples    11
     E.  Preparation of Methyl Esters with Diazomethane  .    11

V   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION	    12

     A.  Organic Characterization of Model Aerosols ...    12
     B.  Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Model Aerosols  .    17
     C.  High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography of
         Derivatized Aerosols 	    28
     D.  Direct Mass Spectral Analysis of Aerosol
         without Prior Chromatography 	    29
     E.  Infrared Spectrum of 1-Heptene Aerosol 	    36
     F.  Analysis of Vapor Phase Organic Species
         Associated with Model Aerosols 	    38
     G.  Reaction Types and Mechanisms Inferred from
         Tentatively Identified Reaction Products in
         Model Aerosols	    44
     H.  Health Effects	    48
     I.  Conclusions	    52

REFERENCES	    53
APPENDIX A.  METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF COMPOUNDS OB-
             SERVED ON THE GC-MS ANALYSIS (FIGURE 10) OF
             TOLUENE AEROSOL, DERIVATIZED WITH BSTFA. . .    54

APPENDIX B.  METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF COMPOUNDS TENTA-
             TIVELY IDENTIFIED ON THE GC-MS ANALYSIS
             (FIGURE 15) OF VAPORS ASSOCIATED WITH TOLUENE/
             NO /S00 AEROSOLS	    61
               x   2
APPENDIX C.  METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF COMPOUNDS OB-
             SERVED ON THE GC-MS ANALYSIS (FIGURE 16) OF
             VAPORS ASSOCIATED WITH l-HEPTENE/NOx/S02
             AEROSOLS	    73

-------
No.
                         FIGURES

                                                                Page
 1   Smog Profile,  Toluene/NO  Aerosol  	       14
                             X

 2   Smog Profile,  Toluene/NO /SO  Aerosol   	       15
                             X   £.

 3   Smog Profile,  1-Heptene/NO /S09 Aerosol  	       16
                               X   ^

 4   Gas Chromatograms  of Methanol  Extract  of
     Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with  Diazo-
     methane (Toluene/NO )  	       19
                        x
 5   Gas Chromatograms  of Methanol  Extract  of
     Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with  Diazo-
     methane (Toluene/NO /S0?)  	       20
                        X   6-

 6   Gas Chromatograms  of Methanol  Extract  of
     Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with  Diazo-
     methane (Toluene/NO /S02> exposed to H2SO,)   	       21

 7   Gas Chromatograms  of Methylene Chloride Extract
     of Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with Diazo-
     methene (Toluene/JO )  	       22
                        X
 8   Gas Chromatograms  of Methylene Chloride Extract
     of Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with Diazo-
     methane (Toluene/NO /S0~)  	       23
                        X   £r

 9   Gas Chromatograms  of Methylene Chloride Extract
     of Toluene Aerosol, after Treatment with Diazo-
     methane (Toluene/NO /S0?, exposed to H^SO.)   	       24
                        X   £*              £  Q
 10  Reconstructed Gas  Chromatograms of Toluene
     Aerosols Derivatized with BSTFA  	       26

 11  Electron Impact Mass Spectrum of 1-Heptene
     Aerosol (Sample M599).  Successive Spectra
     Recorded as Probe  Temperature  Raised from 25 to 200 C       30-32

 12  Chemical lonization Mass Spectrum of 1-Heptene
     Aerosol (Sample M599).  Successive Spectra
     Recorded as Probe  Temperature  Raised from 25 to 200 C       33-35

 13  Infrared Spectrum of Products in Kethylene Chloride. .       37

 14  Methane lonization GC-MS Analysis of Vapor Phase
     Organic Compounds  Associated with Toluene/NO
     Aerosol	       41

 15  Methane lonization GC-MS Analyais of Vapor Phase
     Organic Compounds  Associated with Toluene/NO /S02
     Aerosol	       42

 16  Methane lonization GC-MS Analysis of Vapor Phase
     Organic Compounds Associated with 1-Heptene/NO /S0~
     Aerosol	       43
                              v i

-------
                            TABLES

No.                                                         Page

1   Summary of Irradiation Conditions and Smog
    Parameters	          10

2   Solvent Extraction of Model Aerosol Products  .          17

3   Sulfur Content of Aerosol Extractable Matter  .          27

4   Toxicology of Oxidation Products Obtained
    from Toluene and 1-Heptene in Smog Chamber Runs          49

5   Components of Embalming Fluid Preparations. .  .          51
                             vii

-------
                               SECTION 1
                       SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

         This report constitutes the second year's study of the composition
of model aerosols from individual hydrocarbon precursors under simulated
atmospheric conditions.
          In the previous year's work, aerosols derived from toluene, cyclo-
hexene, and a-pinene were examined.  Because of the complexity of the products,
from a-pinene, research during the present year has concentrated on toluene
and the terminal olefin 1-heptene.  This pair constitutes a representative
aromatic and aliphatic species of the sort found in polluted urban atmospheres.
          Aerosols from the systems toluene/NO , toluene/NO /S0_, and 1-heptene
                                              X.            X   £*
NO /SO  were prepared, collected, and subjected to analysis by mass spectral
  X   £,
techniques, chemical derivatization, and gas and liquid chromatography.
The gas-phase organics associated with the aerosols were also studied.
Individual species identified tentatively in toluene aerosol include isomeric
hydroxybenzoic acids and hydroxy-p-benzoquinones.   Among the gas-phase toluene
products were identified tentatively nitrotoluenes, nitrocresols, benzaldehyde,
and methyl-p-benzoquinone.  The 1-heptene aerosol was examined by mass
spectromety; the results suggested that a number of the components are con-
densation products of species arising from different 1-heptene molecules.
n-Hexaldehyde was tentatively identified among the vapor-phase products from
1-heptene.  The possible adverse health effects of aerosol and gas-phase
products are suggested to be those arising from a general degradative action
toward cellular proteins and amino acids.

-------
                               SECTION II

                             INTRODUCTION
          This report describes research conducted on "Chemical
Characterization Model Aerosols" during the period June 11, 1974 to
November 10, 1975.  This period constitutes the second project-year
under EPA Grant No. 801174.  The report detailing results of the first
year's study, "Chemical Characterization of Model Aerosols" is avail-
able through the National Technical Information Service under NTIS
No. PB238557/3.
          During the current project period organic analysis of
model and atmospheric aerosols was conducted.  Model aerosols were
generated from individual hydrocarbon precursors under atmospheric
simulation in the Battelle-Columbus 17 m  environmental chamber.
          Under the heading below, Background, this year's aerosol
characterization studies are placed in perspective with respect
to results of the first year's study.  Key differences in emphasis
and approach are described.

-------
                             SECTION III
                             BACKGROUND

          During the first year of this program, research was limited
to characterization of model aerosols.  Three systems were studied; a-
pinene/NO , toluene/NO , and 1-heptene/NO .   Aerosol generated under
         X            X                  X.
atmospheric simulation was collected on glass fiber filters, and organic
matter was obtained by solvent extraction.  In order to simplify pro-
duct identification, reaction mixtures were fractionated into defined
acid, neutral, and basic components.  Products were then analyzed by
gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography combined with mass
spectrometry (GC-MS).  Tentative identification of a variety of
interesting aerosol products was accomplished.  The results of the
first year's study are best summarized by reference to these aerosol
products.  In considering the structures shown below, it should be
emphasized that these are tentative identifications.

Cyclohexene aerosol.
                                                                  COOH
            TENTATIVE
          0  0
CH3-CH=Ch-C -C -CH3     HO-CH2-CH2-CH=CH-CH=CH,
   CrC_OEXENE
                               or
                                            Or

-------
          o-Pinene aerosol.
                                          DOH
                     TENTATIVE
           a-PINENE
                                                       COOH
                                                   CHO
Toluene aerosol.
                           COOH
                                       COOH
     "CLLlENE
                                                   CH2OH

-------
During the current year's study, we have moved to investigation of
simulations including both NO  and S09; specifically, toluene/NO /S09
                             X       •*—                          X   £•
and 1-heptene/NO /SO .  In characterizing these systems, the scope of
                X   £-
organic analysis has also been broadened.  During the first year's effort,
the research emphasized identification of aerosol products that had
not undergone extensive oxidation or degradation.  Identification of
such products is profitable in that the structures can be more easily
related to the parent hydrocarbon.  On the basis of this relationship
we may infer the types of reactions occuring under atmospheric simula-
tion.  Indeed, in this report we present a discussion of the reaction
types and mechanisms suggested by the products identified during the
first year's study.
          Although identification of the relatively less-degraded
aerosol products is helpful in elucidating the nature of aerosol re-
actions, we have found that such products constitute a rather small
fraction of the total organic constituency.  Data concerning material
distribution was obtained during earlier work on extraction and
fractionation of aerosol products.  It will be helpful to review this
data as well as aspects of the rationale and methods used during the
first year of the program.
          Collected aerosol was subjected to Soxhlet extraction first
with methylene chloride and then with either acetone or methanol.
The sequential extraction procedure was used to obtain a measure of the
total extractable matter.  The methylene chloride extracts were
expected to contain products less oxidized than those obtained in
methanol or acetone.  Hence, consistent with the analytical emphasis
and rationale, the methylene chloride extractable matter was used for
subsequent fractionation and analysis.  Fractionation was conducted
according to the scheme below.

                       Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
                 \	1
       Water-Soluble  Fraction              Water-Insoluble Fraction
                                        Acid     Neutral     Basic
                                      Fraction  Fraction   Fraction

-------
          The water-insoluble fraction can be expected to contain the
relatively less-oxidized, less-degraded components of the reaction
mixture.  Hence, the water-insoluble material was used for detailed
analysis.
          Further fractionation into acid, basic, and neutral components
was performed by partitioning a methylene chloride solution of the water-
insoluble fraction against dilute aqueous acid and then dilute aqueous
base.  Subsequent analyses could then be conducted on mixtures partly
defined according to chemical class.  For example, in analyzing a neutral
fraction,  one might anticipate the presence of aldehydes, ketones, or
alcohols,  but not carboxylic acids or phenols.  This feature of the
fractionation approach proved extremely helpful in interpretation of mass
spectra of the reaction products.
          Data concerning material distribution obtained during the
extraction and fractionation steps is shown in Tables B-l and B-2
(Ref. Report I, p. 26 and p. 29).  From the data, it is clear that the
water-insoluble fraction of the methylene chloride extractable matter
represents only a small fraction of the total solvent extractable
matter.  In view of this fact, and having achieved some success in
characterization of the relatively less-oxidized components of the
aerosol products, it was decided to direct future efforts toward a
more comprehensive analysis, specifically including the more oxidized
components of the reaction mixture.
          This decision has had serious consequences as to the experi-
mental approach that may be applied.  In particular, the water solu-
bility of the more oxidized products precluded use of the previously
applied acid/base/neutral fractionation procedure.  Moreover, the
extreme polarity of such products severely limited the utility of gas
chromatographic analysis.  Alternative approaches that have been investi-
gated during the current project period have included selective deri-
vatization followed by high pressuie liquid chromatography, and
direct examination of aerosols by mass spectral techniques without
prior chromatography.  Research in these areas will be detailed in
sections below.

-------
          Finally, mention should be made of an additional  area  in
which the research effort has been broadened.  During  the current
project period collection and analysis of gas-phase organics associated
with model aerosols has been conducted.  Samples were  collected  by
drawing filtered air through adsorbant traps.  Collected organics
were later desorbed by heating in a stream of carrier  gas and analyzed
by GC and GC-MS.
          Overall, the program has grown in both the types  of aerosol
samples included for analysis, and the analytical methods brought to
bear on the complex problem of aerosol characterization.
                             SECTION IV
                      METHODS AND PROCEDURES


          The methods of procedure are those described in the August,
1974, Annual Report on Chemical Characterization of Model Aerosols.
The old procedures are partially summarized below along with a des-
cription of the new methods.

 A.	jmog__Chamb_er_ _C_har_ac t er is tic s
          The smog chamber utilized in these studies is approximately
2.4 m high, 4.9 m long, and 1.5 m wide, having a volume of approximately
      3
17.3 m .   The surface-to-volume ratio is 0.78.  The inside surface
                  2                               2
consists of 35.3 m  of polished aluminum and 9.2 m  of FEP-Teflon
windows (5 mil thick) through which the reaction mixture is irradiated
using an external bank of lamps.  The lamp bank consists of 96
fluorescent "black" lamps and 15 fluorescent sunlamps.  The spectral
distribution of the black lamps peaks in intensity at 370 nm; the sun-
lamps peak intensity occurs at 310 nm.  Light intensity generated
corresponds to a k, of 0.45 min   as determined by N0? photolysis and
o-nitrobenzaldehyde actinometry.  This intensity is comparable to that
of noonday sun over the wavelength integral of N0~ absorption.

-------
Air supplied to tne chamber IF Laker1 in through a j C-r staci aior
a tnree-story building,  and is passed througr a purification s\-sterr
including a permanganate filter bed, a charcoal filter system, an
absolute filter, and a humidification unit.  After purification,
background total-hydrocarbon is generally 1-3 ppmC with the majority
of this being methane.  A trace of background ethane is occasionally,
observed by gas chromatography.  Olefins and aromatics have
always been below gas chromatographic detection limits.  Sulfur
dioxide is always oelow the detection limit of a flame photometric
detection  ('"10  ppb)  and carbon monoxide background levels are
generally between 1 and 3 ppm as measured by nondispersive infrared
spectroscopy.  Light scattering readings are essentially the same
as for clean air (Raleigh scattering) and the condensation nuclei
count is generally less than 200 particles per cubic centimeter.
 B.   Smog-Chamber Cleanup
Prior to each series of experiments with a different model hydro-
carbon, it was necessary to thoroughly clean the chamber's surface
to prevent cross contamination of aerosol products.  Such cross
contamination had been observed during previous studies .  Cleanup
was accomplished by washing down chamber surfaces with a spray of
4:1 isopropanol:water,  Prewashed cloths were used to scrub the sur-
faces and surgical scrub suits were worn to prevent contamination
from street clothing.  Throughout the procedure, the chamber was main-
                           _ i
tained on purge (8500 1 min """) .  Nevertheless, the high concentration
of solvent vapor that develops, requires that the chamber be sealed
and that the worker be provided with an  auxiliary breathing apparatus.

After cleanup, the chamber was purged overnight and was then per-
mitted to stand with  1 ppm ozone for several hours.  Before genera-
 tion of aerosol for  analytical use,  a "conditioning" run was conducted
using the model system to be studied.

-------
 C.   Aerosol  Generation, Monitoring, and Collection
Detailed data concerning, reactant concentrations and conditions are
shown in  Table  1.   After  initial concentrations were estab-
lished, the mixing fan was turned off and irradiation was begun.
Parameters monitored throughout  the course of the experiment included
NO and NOi concentration using a continuous Saltzman analyzer,  total
hydrocarbon concentration using a flame ionization detector, ozone
concentration using a chemiluminescence analyzer, and light scatter-
ing  using an integrating nephelometer.

Ir general, irradiation was continued until light scattering measure-
ments indicated that maximum aerosol growth had occurred.  After
this maximum was observed, irradiation was halted and the aerosol
was  collected by evacuating the  chamber contents through tared
10-cir—diameter glass-fiber filters (Gelroan Type A) using a high-
volume type sampler.  Typically, about 11 m  of chamber volume
was  sampled over a 30-ir.inute period.  Before use, the filters were
washed repeatedly, first with distilled-in-glass methanol, and  then
with methylene chloride.  They were then equilibrated at 50 percent
R.H. ana  tared.  After collection,  the filters were reequi1ibrated,
weighed,  and placed ir. glass containers for storage at -60 C.   After
a series  of runs was completed,  collected aerosol was suDiected  to
Soxhlet extraction, as described  in the previous report.

-------
   TABLE  1.   SUMMARY OF  IRRADIATION CONDITIONS AND  SMOG PARAMETERS
                                                                   (a)
Aerosol System

Number of runs
Irradiation period, min.
Relative Humidity
Initial, percent
Final, percent
Hydrocarbon
Mass irradiated
Initial concentration, ppm C
Final concertration, ppm c(b)
Nitric oxide
Initial concentration, ppm
Nitrogen dioxide
Initial concentration, ppm
Maximum concentration, ppm
Sulfur dioxide
Initial concentration, ppm
Final concentration, ppm
Ozone
Maximum concentration, ppm
tmax, min.
Light scattering
Maximum, 10~^m~-'-
Total aerosol mass collected, mg
Toluene/NO/
NO 2
6
240

50
—


73
45

0.97

0.94
1.2

0
0

1.1
198

76
11.5(0
Toluene/NO/
N02/S02
4
240

50
—


71
41

0.89

1.09
1,5

1.08
0.82

0.32
200

120
16.3
1-Heptene/NO/
12
265

50
38


69
6

1.25

1.26
1.7

1.0
0.44

0.42
200

188
38.6
(a)  Data shown are averages for the series of runs,  except for values of total
    aerosol mass collected, which represent the total mass collected during an
    entire series of runs.
(b)  Includes contribution from products formation.
(c)  After treatment with H^SO,  aerosol the average weight was 12.9 mg.
                                     10

-------
D.  Collection and Analysis of Organic Vapor Samples
          Organic vapor samples associated with model aerosols were
collected and subjected to GC-MS analysis.  The filtered (pre-extracted
tissue quartz) gas sample was drawn through an ambient temperature
chromosorb 102 chromatographic trap (15 cm long, 3 cm diameter) at
approximately 0.5 cfm by a Cast 0522 pump.  Prior to analysis, the
traps were sealed with Teflon fittings and protected from light.
          The collected samples were subjected to GC-MS analysis by
thermally desorbing the collected species at 180°C using a helium
flow of approximately 500 ml min  .  The desorbed material was pre-
liminarily transferred to a cooled (-196°C) stainless steel sample
loop.   Chromatographic injection of the collected sample was subse-
quently achieved by diverting the GC carrier gas through the cooled
sample loop, and simultaneously flash-heating the loop to 250°C,
                                                                 (1) *
which immediately sweeps the sample to the head of the GC column.
The chromatographic column is routinely interfaced with either a Finni-
gan 1050 (electron impact) or a Finnigan 3200 (chemical ionization)
mass spectrometer; interpretation of electron impact mass spectra is
facilitated with a mass spectral matching routine with a data bank of
27,000 spectra.

E.  Preparation of Methyl Esters with Diazomethane
          An ether solution of diazomethane was prepared from Diazala  ,
a diazomethane precursor, according to directions given by the supplier
(Aldrich).  About 1 jog of aerosol, prepared by evaporation of the re-
quisite amount of solution, was dissolved in 1 ml of diazomethane solu-
tion and allowed to stand 2-3 hours.  The solution was concentrated
to a volume of about 0.1 ml.  Portions of the concentrate were injected
into the gas chromatograph for examination.
 ^References are  listed  on page  53.

                                     11

-------
                               SECTION V
                       RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A.  Organic Characterization of Model Aerosols
          During the current year's study, the following model aerosol
systems have been investigated:
          o  Toluene/NO
                       X
          o Toluene/NO
                       ^
                      X
          o 1-Heptene/NO /SO
                        X   jL
          Typical aerosol profiles are shown in Figures 1-3.  Irradia-
tion conditions and smog manifestations characterizing the aerosols
are further described in Table 1.  The values shown in the table rep-
resent averages for a series of runs.  There was very little run-to-
run variation in the parameters; it is considered that the magnitude
of such variation was insufficient to be of consequence to the com-
posite aerosol composition.
          In addition to generation of the above aerosols, an addi-
tional experiment was conducted to determine if a 7 organo-sulfur
products are formed after collection of the aerosol by reaction of
sulfuric acid with organics residing on the filter.  In this experi-
ment, a series of five toluene/NO  aerosols were generated under con-
                                 X
ditions described in Table 1.  Collected aerosol from four such runs
was exposed to sulfuric acid aerosol; one toluene/NO  sample was re-
                                                    X
tained as a control.
          Sulfuric acid aerosol was generated by evaporating a quantity
of 98 percent sulfuric acid into the chamber which had been previously
humidified to ~~50 percent RH.  Upon reaching the saturation concentra-
                                                  _3
tion of sulfuric acid under these conditions ("^10  ppb), nucleation
commenced.  Aerosol concentration and growth were monitored with a con-
densation nuclei counter (Environment-One Inc.) and an electrical par-
ticle-mobility analyzer (Thermo Systems, Inc. ). Aerosol generation was
                                                          3   3
terminated upon reaching a volume concentration of^-700 yrn /cm .  This
concentration is approximately equivalent to that expected upon irradi-
ation of 1 ppm S0_ in a typical smog environment.  The mean particle
diameter in the volumetric distribution was ^0.2 ym.
          To further simulate experimental conditions employed in
aerosol generation from toluene/NO /SO., 1 ppm SO,, was included during
                                  X   
-------
were exposed to both sulfuric acid and S0_.  Exposure was conducted
as follows.  After the sulfuric acid aerosol was fully developed, as
described above, portions of the chamber contents were exhausted
through filters containing previously collected toluene/NO  aerosol.
                                                          X
Each filter was exposed individually to  15 percent of the chamber
contents over a period of  15 minutes.
                                     13

-------
2.0



 1.8



 1.6
e
o.
Q.

c
o
   1.2
£  1.0
c
0)
o

§  0.8
(A

3
   0.4
   0.2
      0
                                   Initial Cone.
                              Toluene

                              NO

                              N02
                                          10 ppm

                                          0.97 ppm

                                          0.94 ppm
                60         120        180        240

                     Irradiation Time, minutes
200



180



160 _

    'e

140 ^

    X

120 "5
     o



ioot
    c.
                                                                 o
                                                                 o
                                                                 en
                                                           80  2>



                                                           60



                                                           40



                                                           20
                                                         300
           FIGURE 1.  SMOG PROFILE, TOLUENE/NO  AEROSOL
                                         X
                                 14

-------
                                                        200
                                   Toluene 10 ppm
                                   NO     0.89 ppm
                                   N02     1.09 ppm
                                            1.08 ppm
0
            60
    120        180        240
Irradiation Time, minutes
    FIGURE 2.  SMOG PROFILE,  TOLUENE/NO /S00  AEROSOL
                                  x   2.
                            15

-------
                                                 200
                         l-Heptene  10 ppm
                         NO         1.25 ppm
                                    1-26 ppm
                         SO?        I  Ppm
     60         120        180       240
          Irradiation Time, minutes
300
FIGURE 3.  SMOG PROFILE, 1-HEPTENE/NO /SO  AEROSOL
                               X  Z.
                     16

-------
          Aerosol products were collected by filtration as described
in Methods of Procedure and were then subjected to sequential Soxhlet
extraction first with methylene chloride, and then methanol.  Values
for weight percent solvent extractable are shown in Table 2.  Gas-
phase organics associated with the model aerosols were collected at
the same time as filtration samples by passing filtered chamber con-
tents through Chromsorb 102 adsorbent traps.  Aerosol extracts and
gas phase organics were analyzed in detail as described under the
headings below.
           TABLE  2.   SOLVENT  EXTRACTION OF MODEL AEROSOL PRODUCTS
        Aerosol  System
   Weight-Percent Solvent Extractable	
 First Extraction,     Second Extraction,
Methylene Chloride          Methanol
Toluene/NO aerosol
X
Toluene/NO aerosol exposed
to sulfuric acid aerosol
Toluene/NO /S09 aerosol
X £,
1-Heptene/NO /SO aerosol
X £*
18
29

21
22
63
55

75
49
B.  Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Model Aerosols
          As described in the Background section of this report, the
analytical objectives of this year's research emphasize characteriza-
tion of the abundant, highly-oxidized components of model aerosol.
These polar, water-soluble organics cannot be treated using the pre-
viously applied fractionation procedure.  Fractionation had proven
useful in that particular compound types were isolated in defined
fractions.  An alternative strategy based on selective derivatization
was attempted to distinguish between different compound types.  Initial
                                    17

-------
gas chromatographic analyses were performed on unfractionated, underi-
vated aerosol extracts.  It was reasoned that free carboxylic acids,
phenols, and other highly polar compounds such as polyols would be
entirely retained on the column; only neutral products of moderate
polarity would be eluted.  A short pre-column can be used to prevent
buildup of retained material on the analytical column.  The strategy
then called for treatment of parallel portions of aerosol extract with:
          (a)  Diazomethane
          (b)  0,N-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA)
          Treatment with diazomethane yields relatively volatile methyl
esters from carboxylic and sulfonic acids, and methyl-aryl ethers from
phenols.  BSTFA reacts with acids and alcohols to form trimethylsilyl
(TMS) esters and ethers.  Derivatization was first attempted with the
aerosol from the toluene runs.  Analyses of underivatized methylene
chloride and methanol extracts were performed with a 10 ft x 2 mm
column of 3-percent OV-17 and a 14 ft x 2 mm column of 3-percent Dexil.
The temperature was programmed from 100°C to 275°C at 6 degrees/min.
Dual flame-ionization and flame-photometric (sulfur-specific) detectors
were employed.  The chromatograms obtained showed only a few poorly
resolved peaks of negligible intensity.  Total detector response sug-
gests that no more than 1 percent of injected matter was eluted
(injected samples = 50 yg each).  The results suggest that even the
non-acid constituents of the aerosol consisted of highly polar products.
          Figures 4-9 show several chromatograms obtained after the
toluene aerosol extracts were treated with diazomethane.  A small
increase in total detectoL response was noted compared to the underi-
vated samples.  Nevertheless, the overall response account for less
than 10-percent of injected  methylene chloride extractable matter and less
than 5-percent of injected methanol extractable matter (50 yg injec-
tions).   The components showing flame-photometric (sulfur) response
have been shown in most cases to correspond to impurities in several
batches of diazomethane reagent.  In the case of the methanol extract
of toluene/NO /S0_, two sulfur-containing components appear which may
             X   «£
be genuine reaction  products.  They do not appear in toluene/NO  aero-
                                                                X
sol, or toluene/NO  aerosol exposed to H?SO.  aerosol.  They account for
                                  18

-------
                              c
                              'i
                              o
                              ro
                              C\J
                             CJ
                           _  00 —
                                                                               w
                                                                               is
                                                                               H
                                                                               W
                                                                               a
                                                                               o
                                                                               H
                                                                               M
                                                                               DS

                                                                               H

                                                                               W
                                                                               g
W
Pi
H

Pi  •
W u
H
fn O

-------
                c

                i
                O
                ro
                CJ
                C\J
              -  ro -
                                                         w
                                                         53
                                                         O

                                                         N
LO



w



O
HOI33I3Q

-------
                      -8-
                        (\J
                        CVJ
                        OJ'
                      -00-
                             r
                      — OJ-
                                                             u
                      -ro -
                                                             w
                                                             tu
NOIIVZINOI-aWVli
                              21

-------
                       in
                       O)
                       CM
                       c\i
                     - CM -
                     _ CO _
                     _ in _
                     - cr> -
                     -ro-
                       O
r^

a
      HOID3I3Q

NOIIVZINOI-aHVld
                              22

-------
                     in
                     o>

                     3
                     C

                     i




                    •8
                     r-
                     C\J
                     CM
                   _ CO -
                   -ro-
                                                            u •

                                                            td O

                                                               I

                                                              O

                                                               I
                        w
                        J
                                                            H
                                                            a
                                                            o a,
                                                            o w
                                                            H S
                                                            ^ <
                                                            2 33
                                                            O H
                                                            oi w
                                                              N:
                                                            CO <
NOIIVZINOI-3HV1J
DIHX3WOIOHd-3WVld

-------
                        o _
                        ro
                         CM
                         CM
                                                                         33
                                                                         H
                                                                         w
                                                                         g
                                                                         H
                                                                         <
                                                                         W
                                                                         ed
                                                                         H
                                                                         ft* O
                                                                         
-------
less than 1-percent of the injected sample, however.
          Comparison of chromatograms for diazomethane treated extracts
of the three toluene aerosols suggest that exposure of collected
toluene/NO  aerosol products to sulfuric acid aerosol does not lead
to formation of new products (detectable by this approach).  In the
diazomethane-treated, methylene chloride extractable matter from toluene/
  x   2 aerosol there is only one moderate peak not observed in the cor-
responding sample of toluene/NO  aerosol (peak at 25 minutes).
                               X
          As described above, the next step in the analytical approach
called for derivatization with BSTFA.  It was reasoned, that if the
uneluted material consisted of non-volatile alcohols or polyols, BSTFA
should generate volatile IMS ethers.  Gas chromatographic analysis of
toluene aerosol products indicates that a significantly larger fraction
of subjected material is being eluted after BSTFA treatment (^30-per-
cent eluted).   Thus, these samples were analyzed by GC-MS.  Reconstructed
gas chromatograms are shown in Figure 10.
          The CI-MS spectra of the BSTFA-derivatized samples are shown
in Appendix A.  Most of the spectra, even after background subtraction,
showed numerous peaks, and only the relatively simple spectra that
appeared to contain only one major component have been included.  In
those cases the parent ions were identified and structures were assigned
by selection of reasonable structures with the correct molecular
weights.  The compounds tentatively identified are shown in the figure.
We emphasize the tentative nature of these assignments.
          The methylene chloride extract of 1-heptene aerosol was simi-
larly treated with BSTFA and analyzed gas chromatographically.  Total
detector response corresponded to only 5-percent of injected material.
Thus, the sample was not analyzed by GC-MS.
          For both 1-heptene and toluene aerosols analysis by flame
photometric gas chromatography revealed negligible sulfur response
above blank.  In view of the low sulfur response for all aerosol samples,
extracts were subjected to analyses for total sulfur.  The data are
shown in Table 3.  Samples taken for analysis varied somewhat in size,
leading to some variation in the lower limit of detection.  Thus, any
                                     25

-------
   d P flj 11 (j LU \/
26

-------
 values below 1-percent sulfur should be viewed as  approximately equi-
 valent.   The methanol extracts for  toluene/NO /SO   aerosol  and toluene/
                                              X  £*
 NOX exposed to sulfuric acid aerosol show  significantly higher concen-
 trations  of sulfur,  which probably  arise from inorganic sulfate sol-
 uble in the methanol.   This  was  indicated  by  a sulfate  analysis of
 one collected aerosol from a 1-heptene/NO  /SO, run, which showed 40%
      ,	                                  X   ^
 of  SO" by  weight  of total particulates  on the filter.   These  data in-
 dicate that the low  concentrations  of organo-sulfur compounds  observed
 by  flame-photometric gas  chromatography  was not due to  retention of
 abundant  organo-sulfur compounds on the  column.

              TABLE 3 .   SULFUR CONTENT OF AEROSOL EXTRACTABLE MATTER
                                           Weight-Percent Sulfur
                                  Methylene Chloride        Methanol
           Aerosol System         Extractable Matter    Extractable Matter
Toluene/NO aerosol
X
Toluene/NO /SO aerosol
Toluene/NO aerosol exposed
<0.5

<0.8
<0.8
<0.3

3.9
1.2
      to sulfuric acid aerosol

    1-Heptene/NO /S09 aerosol             0.1                   17.9
                X    ^
          One additional derivatization approach was attempted to
facilitate gas chromatographic analysis.  It has been observed that low
molecular weight aldehydes and ketones tend to polymerize at the ele-
vated temperatures of gas chromatographic analysis.  In order to deter-
mine whether such compounds correspond to the uneluted fraction of
aerosol products, extractable matter was treated with ethanedithiol
to stabilize such carbonyls as dithiolane derivatives.


              \          \       RF,          ^  /*     CH2
               C ' 0 +     CH2    —^	-^      C
               /            1                    /   S	  CH2
                           CH2
                        HS

                                      27

-------
          Preparation of dithiolane derivatives  is additionally useful
in that the derivatives give both flame-ionization and flame-photometric
response.  In these analyses, a rather high blank was obtained.  Never-
theless, for both toluene and 1-heptene aerosols no significant compon-
ents above blank were observed.  Based on the sample size taken for
derivatization, injected material should correspond to 20 yg.   Virtually
complete loss of sample to the aqueous phase during workup could account
for chromatographic results observed.
          Results of the series of gas chromatographic analyses suggests
that the aerosol products consist principally of highly oxidized, highly
polar compounds.  These have not been rendered volatile by generally
employed derivatization techniques.  In view of  the failure of this
approach, two different techniques have been investigated to determine
feasibility.  These are:
          (1)  High-pressure liquid chromatography followed
               by mass spectrometric analyses of isolated products.
          (2)  Direct mass spectral analysis of  aerosol without
               chromatography.
          These studies are described under subsequent headings.

C.  High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography of Derivatized Aerosols.
          Since the functional groups expected in the components of the
aerosol do not absorb light strongly,  the UV-visible detection system
currently in use with the HPLC instrument was not suitable for analysis
of small amounts of atmospheric aerosols.  Simple derivatives of the
components are suitable, however, if the derivatizing reagent contains
an absorbing group.
          Prliminary experiments were carried out with a sample of the
1-heptene aerosol.  The derivatizing reagent was a,p-dibromoaceto-
phenone, which reacts with acids as follows:
                                         R COO
                                               -I-  Br
                              CH2-02CR

-------
This reagent was repeatedly reacted with the methanol extract of the 1-
heptene aerosol and chromatographed using HPLC with UV detection.  A
large peak corresponding to the derivatizing reagent was always observed.
Other peaks were also observed but did not appear on duplicate runs.
This may be due to impurities in the derivatizing reagent as well as
to interferences by some component of the sample.  Due to the unknown
nature of the sample and the experimental nature of derivatization re-
actions in HPLC, more development in optimizing derivatization procedures
is needed.  These include methods for derivatization of alcohol, ketone,
as well as acid functionalities, and of compounds containing multiple
functionalities.

D.  Direct Mass Spectral Analysis of Aerosol without
Prior Chromatography.
          Since the bulk of the 1-heptene aerosol products did not pass
through a chromatographic column under our conditions, even when deri-
vatized, we examined a sample of 1-heptene aerosol that was evaporated
from a solution placed directly on the probe of the mass spectrometer.
The probe was placed in the instrument and heated while  successive
spectra were run.  The procedure was carried out twice, first with con-
ventional electron impact (El) and then with chemical ionization (CI)
by proton transfer from C,H n ion.  Under these conditions, we expect
low-molecular weight species to volatilize first, followed by higher
molecular weight species with lower vapor pressures.  The resulting
spectra (Figures 11 and 12) are, of course, complicated because the
method does not cleanly separate related compounds, and because a signal
at any given m/e value can result from several isomeric compounds pre-
sent in the sample.
          The El spectra (Figure 11) show fragments up to about 260,
which corresponds approximately to two heptene molecules plus four
oxygens (C H  0 )  = 260.  The CI spectra (Figure 12) show more dis-
tinctive features, in part because CI usually gives simpler fragmenta-
tion patterns and larger parent ions.  Spectrum No. 4 shows two groups
of peaks with a minimum around m/e 180, while spectrum No. 7 has a
second minimum around m/e 300.  Each group of peaks consists of triplets
of quartets separated by 14-16 mass units.  This mass difference is equal
                                    29

-------
    90-
 >-  80-
 i—
 co  70-
 JJJ  60-
 550-
 ^40-
,r  30-
'CE
 _J
 UJ
20-
10-
      04
         20
CL
cc:
          40
,imtL.^.imtliH--UmllU-,..tMmHJlt-i y"1)" . t"h' , i "'!*• |  i1'. i 'i- i -i 1  ) i j- -i | i  i i'
60   6'0   100   20   4'0   60   80   200  20
                M/E
40
                               SPECTRUM NO. 2
uu-
90-
80-
70-
60-
40-
30-
10-
n
i







ii






L


i,







i!'
Illnil



1 1 .IJlilL Jliii, Ji ,1,1,11,1 ,1,. .,!,., ,i,.. ,li ill .1, ... .
                                   I  UU  UU  
-------
   100
   90
>~ 80-
co 70^
   50-j
   40^
   30-1
C£  ..
       20  40  60  80  lOO^'O^O'e'O'S'O 200'20  40 60 80 300 20  40  60  80 400 20
                                              M/E
                                  SPECTRUM NO. 4
>:  eo
    r—i /—,
CO  /U
LU  A;
   30
CL
  i  >-,-•
LU  -U
ct:  . -
                           LJOliL^
              [ llt|(»j)H| iilllllli. .lilllltlln I "IHHyiiii lill1'11!'!-- MP'lf-1 .U.'ll'. i.ililHI. .ljUlllt. '''Mi I1'1!1 1. II I . i1'1!'  'r'l .Ml i.'vni i. Irlii  ," , .'. ilii. i /'..•..'... 1 .... i ..
     0 ' 20 ' 40 6D  80  130 20  40  60 ' 8'0 '200' 20 ' 40 ' 6'0 '  SO '300'  2'Q ' 4'0 ' 5'0  8'0 400' 20
                                              M/E
                                  SPECTRUM NO.  5
  FIGURE  11.  ELECTRON IMPACT MASS SPECTRUM OF 1-HEPTENE AEROSOL (SAMPLE  M599).
              SUCCESSIVE  SPECTRA RECORDED AS  PROBE TEMPERATURE RAISED  FROM 25
              TO 200 C.
                                               31

-------
CE
	I

LU
 lOOn


 90-


 80





1 60-


i 50-


1 40-


' 30-
     -i

 20-


 10-


   OH
                                               j.i|l,..lii,iJlili ,iil., ,i,.
(lilliilin II .tiViH"' ji "l1 ''i li" \'  ' 1 | --'T"1", "^"'Y T~T"1  't",—i-i.'jfa' i—.uMii.......^.!.	..u^—.—jJU,	^.u	...I.M...—,.iJ^...P-....^—, , .. i, .j-.f*—^..p^...,

4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0  200' 2'0 ' 4'd ' 6'0  8'0  300 20  40  60  80 400 20   4'0

                M/E



      SPECTRUM NO.  7
        2'ti ' 4D
   100-j

    90-


>:  80-


^o  70-
z:
LU  60-

250:

LL;  40-


^  30-
cr

H  2CH
^     i
    101
        2'0 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 'lOO 20  40  60  80  200 2D  40 bd 8'Cl  3'od'"2'0"' 4'0 ' 6'd"'' 3U 400'

                                                M/E


                                      SPECTRUM NO.  8


   FIGURE 11.   ELECTRON IMPACT MASS  SPECTRUM  OF  1-HEPTENE AEROSOL (SAMPLE  M599)

                SUCCESSIVE SPECTRA RECORDED AS PROBE TEMPERATURE RAISED  FROM 25

                TO 200  C.
                                               32

-------
lOOn
90-
>: so-
co 70-
|^ 60-
2 50-
^J 40-
i — i
h- 30-
cr
td20;
^ 10-
n.










,11
,„. U.L1



Jj










.
h i it

.






|

lHiLlJj JL,|lL,dI,l|L lliiL 1 ,.,f ,
                                         M/E
                           SPECTRUM No. 1
     20  40  60 80
4'0 ' 6'0  80 400  2'0 ' 4'0 ' 60
                           SPECTRU1"! NO. 4
FIGURE  12.   CHEMICAL IONIZATION MASS SPECTRUM OF 1-HEPTENE AEROSOL  (SAMPLE  M599)
             SUCCESSIVE SPECTRA RECORDED AS PROBE TEMPERATURE RAISED  FROM 25 TO
             200 C.

                                       33

-------
                                                    .11  I
                 0 2'0  <0 60  80 200 20 40  60 80 300' 2'ti ' 4'0 ' 60  80 400 20  40  60  8'0 500
                                           M/E
                                SPECTRUM NO. 7
  100
  90
^ 80
CO 70
^ 60
iso
Uj 40
                  Hi
MMM^MMimAJt
          300
     20  40 60 80 100 20  40 60 80 200 20 40 60 80 300 20 40 f'J 9G 400' 20 ' 4ii' 60 ' 8'0 500' 20"' 4u ' 60 ' 8'0 '5(50'
                                          M/E
                                 SPECTRUM NO.  10
  FIGURE  12.  CHEMICAL IONIZATION MASS  SPECTRUM OF  1-HEPTENE AEROSOL (SAMPLE M599)
              SUCCESSIVE SPECTRA RECORDED AS  PROBE  TEMPERATURE RAISED FROM 25 TO
              200 C.
                                           34

-------
  100-]
   90-
>: so-
u^ 10-
~z_
^ 60-
550-
UJ 40-
~ 30-
LU
   20-
10-
 0
                         ii jL(iiiLUii,,i!iik,iiiiJk
ill,  .,
      2'0 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 '100' 2'0 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 200 Z'O 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 '300' 2'0 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 00 400' 20 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0 500' 2'0 ' 4'0 ' 6'0 ' 8'0
                                                M/E
                                      SPECTRUM NO. 13

FIGURE 12.   CHEMICAL IONIZATION MASS SPECTRUM OF  1-HEPTENE AEROSOL  (SAMPLE M599).
              SUCCESSIVE SPECTRA RECORDED  AS PROBE  TEMPERATURE  RAISED FROM  25  TO
              200 C.
                                               35

-------
to one oxygen atom, a methylene unit, or to one oxygen atom less two
hydrogen atoms.  It is reasonable that components in the aerosol mix-
ture would differ in this way, since photodegradation of organics under
smog-chamber conditions involves oxidative removal of H-atoms, chain
scission reactions, and incorporation of atmospheric oxygen.
          The signals with the highest m/e appear in No.  10 with m/e
436.   It is not known whether compounds of higher molecular weight were
absent from the sample or simply were not sufficiently volatile to
appear on our spectra.  Another possible explanation for their absence
is that such high-molecular weight species were not removed from the
filter by our extraction procedure.  To discount this alternative, we
examined a filter sample containing 1-heptene aerosol in the mass
spectrometer probe.  Although signals with m/e up to several hundred
were observed, the spectrum was very weak and could not be ascribed
with certainty to aerosol alone.
          To our knowledge, the presence of polymeric substances in
hydrocarbon aerosols has not been demonstrated previously, although
there has been some discussion in this regard.
          Further work will be necessary to determine the nature of the
cross-links in the polymers, which will provide a clue to the mechanism
for formation of the aerosol.

E.  Infrared Spectrum of 1-Heptene Aerosol.
          The infrared spectrum of the methylene chloride extract of
the aerosol from the 1-heptene/NO /S0_ experiment was recorded as a
film on sodium chloride plates.  The spectrum is shown in Figure 13,
and reveals strong absorption in the regions corresponding to frequencies
where hydroxy, carbonyl groups, and C-0 single bonds absorb.  The only
distinctive features are strong absorptions at 1620 and 1280 m   which
correspond to strong bonds associated with organic nitrates (general
structure RON09).  Such compounds have been postulated to be present
                              (2)
in urban atmospheric aerosols.  Although this result was interesting,
                                    36

-------
w
p
M
Pi
O

£
O

w
a
H
E-i

W
 H
 O
 3
 O
 O
 Pi
 pu
 w
 AJ
 en

 O
 w
 pi
  fn

-------
we have not recorded other infrared spectra of our aerosols because the
general features usually are not very informative.  Similar spectra have
been described in detail in an earlier report on model aerosols.

F.  Analysis of Vapor Phase Organic Species
Associated with Model Aerosols
          Vapor phase species were collected using Chromosorb 102 chromato-
graphic traps, following filtration by a pre-extracted quartz fiber
filter.  Approximately 300 liters of gas were sampled from the smog-
chamber in each instance.  The collected samples were recovered by
thermal desorption, followed by freeze-out in a stainless steel sample
loop; chromatographic injection was subsequently achieved through flash-
heating the loop to 250 C and diverting the GC carrier gas through it,
as described earlier.  The three model aerosol systems chosen for this
study were toluene/NO , toluane/NO /SO-, and 1-heptene/NO /S09/N0 .  GC
                     X            X   £.                  X   t-   £•
separation was achieved using a Silar SCP chromatographic column; GC-MS
analysis was carried out by methane chemical ionization.

1.  Analysis of Volatile Species Associated with Toluene Aerosol.  Two
experiments were carried out, one utilizing toluene/NO /S09, and the
                                                      X   /.
other in the absence of S0_.  The objectives were to determine what
volatile products were formed, and how these differed from the species
associated with filterable particulate, and also to determine whether
sulfur-containing species were associated with the more volatile aerosol
products.
          Striking differences from the previous analysis of the par-
ticulate aerosol material were immediately evident in both experiments.
The products observed had undergone little or no oxidative degradation,
and a considerable degree of ring substitution had taken place.  Rela-
tively minor differences were observed between the two experiments,
and no organic sulfur-containing compounds were detected.  All major
products were common to both experiments, except one, and eight of the
nine major products contained a nitro group.
          As might be expected on the basis of free radical oxidation,
benzaldehyde, phenol, and three isomers of nitrotoluene have been
                                    38

-------
tentatively identified on the basis of their methane ionization mass
spectra.  Additionally, one isomer of nitrophenol has been tentatively
identified in each reaction system.  We are presently unable to assign
a structure to three further products which are common to each experi-
ment, these compounds most probably have molecular weights of 122, 112,
and 90.  One major peak which appears to be a polar compound and to
have a molecular weight of 122 was found only in the toluene/NO SO-
                                                               X  ^
system, although this material does not appear to contain sulfur.  The
mass spectrum of this latter compound is consistent with methyl-p-ben-
zoquinone, which will be identified conclusively when an authentic
sample is received for comparison.
          While four isomeric nitrocresols  were found in both of these
systems, only two were previously found in filterable particulate from
a similar toluene/NO  system^' However, the vapor sampling/analysis
                    X
system permits significantly higher sensitivity which could account
for this apparent discrepancy, since two of the isomers were of rela-
tively minor concentration.  Surprisingly, nitrotoluene was not pre-
viously observed in filtered aerosol particulate, yet all three possible
isomers were observed in this study.  We are unable to explain the
presence of styrene and ethyl styrene, other than to attribute them to
contamination or impurities in the original toluene.
          In summary, the following species have been determined on
both toluene/NO  and toluene/NO S0? systems.  No sulfur organics were
               X               X  £-
detected.
        CHO
      
-------
The reconstructed gas chromatograms for the respective GC-MS analysis
are shown in Figures 14 and 15; tentatively identified compounds are in-
dicated on the figures, and the mass spectra for peaks in the toluene/NO /
                                                                        X
SO  experiment are included in Appendix B.

2.  Analysis of Volatile Species Associated with 1-Heptene Aerosol. Gas
chromatographic analysis of the organic vapors associated with 1-heptene/
NO /S09 aerosol provides a remarkably simple well resolved chromatogram.
  X   ^
Unfortuantely, the subsequent GC-MS analysis of this sample by methane
ionization has presented some difficulty.  The six major products give
high quality spectra, but since they are all presumably aliphatic, the
spectra leave oper. a very wide range of possibilities with regard to
interpretation.  The spectral assignments indicated on Figure 16 must
at this stage be regarded as speculative, although they are not incon-
sistent with the mass spectra of the major peaks which are presented in
Appendix C.
                                     40

-------
 X
O
LJ
2
UJ
te
                                                                                       IS


                                                                                       w


                                                                                       M

                                                                                       O

                                                                                       GO


                                                                                       to
                                                                                       u
                                                                                       M
                                                                                       a
                                                                                       PH
                                                                                      o

                                                                                      to
                                                                                      M
                                                                                      CO
                                                                                      00
                                                                                      S
                                                                                      a o
                                                                                      O C/3
                                                                                      M O
                                                                                      E-i BJ
                                                                                      <: w
                                                                                      SI -^
                                                                                      o o
                                                                                      W
                                                                                         W
                                                                                         O
                                                                                         H
                                                                                      o
              001

-------
                                                         TOLUENE/NOX/S02

                                                         VAPORS
13
23  33  13  S3

   HTBER
                 69  70  68  S3  103  113 129 139  119 ISO 163  173 180 133  203 2SO 223 Z33 2tO 2SS
   FIGURE 15   METHANE IONIZATION GC-MS ANALYSIS OF VAPOR  PHASE  ORGANIC'

               COMPOUNDS ASSOCIATED WITH TOLUENE/NO /S09 AEROSOL
                                                   X    £•
                                       42

-------
CO
\
 x
O
                                                             00
                                                             O
                                                             O
                                                             u
                                                             O
                                                             Pi
                                                             O

                                                             w
                                                             00
                                                             fe W
                                                             O 
-------
G.  Reaction Types and Mechanisms Infrared from Tentatively Identified
Reaction Products in Model Aerosols
          On the basis of reactions which are known to occur during
smog formation, it is possible to write reasonable mechanisms leading
to the products that we have tentatively identified from different aero-
sol precursors (see Background section).  Some mechanisms we favor are
as follows.

-------
Cyclohexene products
            •OH
•   o2
                        OH
OOO- NO
OH^
                                                   CHO
        P«
         OH
             N0
   ix^/CHOH
         00-
2-
   k  ./CHOH
    ^^  I
         0-
         CCHO 02a>
         0-
      N0
         2ON02
                CH2OH

             COOH
             RCHO
             (-RCOOH)
                              45

-------
a-Pinene products
     CH,
0-0

  6
       ,0
        COOH
2.
            H0«
                                      OH
                  00-

                  H
      NO
          0«

          H
OH


 CHO  °2

0

CHO
                                     OX
3.
          CHO
                         0  °2
   CO
   •
                 0   NO
    -C02


  5-00.

  0
         0   °2
                  o 3

                  ,CH20«
                                                      0
                                                       CHO
                                46

-------
Toluene products
                   CH
           HO
            N02
2.   O
           H0«or
           hv/02
       ,0.
                                   CHOH
                     CH3
                             CH3
                             02
                          0
                                 00»
                                 H

                                 0
                                             NO
       CH:
           H
CH3            CH3

   CHO Og   r^^CHO  NO
                                     CH3
                                                  CHO  CHO
                      H
                                     H
                               47

-------
          The above reactions are rather obvious ones, and we have not
tried to include every plausible route to each compound.   The most in-
teresting feature in the products, from a mechanistic point of view,
are the large number of terminal alcohol groups.  These represent a
relatively reduced functionality, and it is difficult to write many
homogeneous gas-phase mechanisms from the starting materials we studied,
which give alcohols as products.  We have accordingly considered many
redox reactions in our mechanisms involving aldehyde disproportionations:
          RCHO + R'CHO + RCH OH + R'COOH.
          This type of reaction is given as "ox" in the mechanisms, and
presumably would take place within the aerosol droplets.  If the reduc-
ing aldehyde is formaldehyde, the product is formic acid.  Both of the
latter compounds are known constituents of atmospheric smog.
          The ring-operated products from toluene can be explained in a
simple fashion if we invoke 3-scission in alkoxy radicals, which we postu-
late as intermediate species.  Nitration and hydroxylation of toluene
probably occur by a free-radical mechanism as depicted above, followed
by rearrangements of Che radical adducts that probably take place in
the condensed phase.  On the other hand, cresols (hydroxytoluenes) are
quite reactive toward nitration in solution, and it is therefore also
reasonable that the nitrocresols may be formed from nitric acid and
cresols within the aerosol drops or at surfaces, rather than as shown
above.
          It should be emphasized that neither the mechanisms nor the
nature of the products are firmly established.  Many products can be
generated on paper by slight variations of the above reaction paths,
that are not observed (or have not been identified) by our analytical
procedures.  Future work will render the nature of the reactions more
certain.

H.  Health Effects
          The toxic doses and safety limits for concentrations of the
compounds tentatively identified in the vapor and particulate phases in
this work are given in Table 4.  The compounds that appear in brackets
                                   48

-------
           TABLE 4.  TOXICOLOGY OF COMPONENTS IN TOLUENE
                     AND 1-HEPTENE-DERIVED AEROSOLS
	Compound	Toxicology	

4-Nitro-m-cresol               ipr-mus LDLo:500 mg/kg

2-Nitro-p-c.resol               orl-rat LD50:3360 mg/kg

m-,o-, and p-Nitrotoluene      USOS-air: TWA 5 ppm  (skin)

[Nitroglycerin                 USOS 2 mg/m3  (0.22 ppm)  (skin)]

[p-Benzoquinone                USOS air: TWA 0.1 ppm]

2-Methyl-p-benzoquinone        orl-rat LDLo 250 mg/kg

Benzaldehyde                   orl-rat LD50: 1300 mg/kg

n-Hexaldehyde                  ihl-rat LCLo: 2000 ppm/4H

[1,2-Epoxybutane               ihl-rat LCLo: 4000 ppm]


Source: NIOSH Toxic Substances List, 1974
                               49

-------
are related to ones tentatively identified, since data on few of the
more oxidized toluene products are available.  (Nitroglycerin has been
included because two strong bands in the IR spectrum of the crude 1-
heptene aerosol supported the presence of organic nitrates.)
          In polluted atmospheres, the concentration of particulate is
                      3
usually below 100 yg/m ,  of which about one quarter is organic.  If
an average molecular weight of 200 in the organic portion is assumed,
the upper limit of organic pollutant concentration in the aerosol is
about 0.01 ppm.  The toxic levels and safety thresholds in Table 4
are all considerably above this value.  Although (1) much of the data
in Table 4 pertains to animal studies, (2) many of the figures refer
to doses administered by means other than inhalation, and (3) amounts
less than the lethal doses cited may cause tissue damage, it does not
appear that any of the organic compounds tentatively identified poses
an immediate health hazard.  On the other hand, we cannot discount
long-term effects on humans of inhalation of such compounds in small
quantities, either alone or in combination with other pollutants.
          In particular,  many of the compounds identified in our study
are present in, or related to components of embalming preparations
(Table 5).  The function of the aldehydes in such preparations is to
coagulate and harden protein, while the alcoholic constituents lower
the surface tension of the liquid and promote diffusion of the aldehydes
into tissue.'  ' A different cellular phenomenon for which aldehydes  (in
particular, malondialdehyde) are held responsible, is the appearance of
fluorescent pigments (age pigments) in living tissues in amounts that
increase with the age of the organism.  Such pigments are thought merely
to accompany oxidative reactions of lipids/  'although their formation
involves cross-linking reactions that may cause loss in tissue resiliency.
Compounds containing multiple aldehyde groups, which may react in the
same manner to induce cross-linking, were identified tentatively in
earlier work in these laboratories^  ' and elsewhere.'  '
                                    50

-------
   TABLE 5.  COMPONENTS OF EMBALMING FLUID
             PREPARATIONS
Formaldehyde       Phenol
Glutaraldehyde     Glycerin
Benzaldehyde       Salicylic Acid
Furfural           tert-Butanol
Water              Methanol
                   Hydroxymethylcellulose

Sources:  Bennet, "The Chemical Formulary";
          Kirk-Othmer, "Encyclopedia of
          Chemical Technology"
                     51

-------
I.  Conclusions
          Although product identifications for many of the oxidized
species are tentative, the overall picture of the fate of toluene and
1-heptene under simulated urban atmospheric conditions is what we would
reasonably expect.  The initial oxidation processes give relatively
simple, identifiable derivatives that are found on gas phase sampling.
The particulate aerosol products from both hydrocarbons are more highly
oxidized, and hence more polar and less volatile.  For 1-heptene the aero-
sol consists in part of compounds of high molecular weight that are
formed by condensation of species arising from different heptene mole-
cules.  The fact that conventional derivatization fails to render either
aerosol more than about 30% volatile is consistent with the presence
of several functional groups in the molecules or with a high molecular
weight.  Sulfur dioxide and sulfuric acid aerosol do not give appreci-
able quantities of new compounds detectable by our approach when in-
cluded in the toluene runs-.
          All of the products identified from the vapor or aerosol
phase in toluene and 1-heptene are present in concentrations that do not
appear to present a direct health hazard in the quantities expected in
urban  atmospheres.  The composition of the model aerosols and oxidized
species  in the vapor, however, resembles that of several embalming
fluids that owe their preservative action in part to reactions of aldehyde
components with tissue protein.  The effects on humans of organic aerosols
over  extended periods, either alone or in synergism with other pollutants,
therefore, may be significant.
                                      52

-------
                              REFERENCES
(1)  Jones,  P.W.,  Report No.  74-265,  67th APCA Meeting, Denver, Colorado,
    (June 9-13,  1974).

(2)   Schuetzle,  D.,  Cronn,  D.,  Crittenden,  A.  L.,  and Charlson, R.  J.,
     Environ.  Sci.  Tech. , _9_,  838 (1975).

(3)   Miller,  D.  F.,  Schwartz,  W. E.,  Gemma, J. L.,  and Levy, A. "Haze
     Formation - Its Nature and Origin", Battelle  Columbus Laboratories,
     Final  Report to the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (Contract
     No.  68-02-0792) and the  Coordination Research Council (March,  1975).

(4)   Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2nd ed., Interscience,
     19,  Col.  8,  p.  100.

(5)   See  e.g., Chio, K. S.,  and Tappel,  A.  L.  Biochemistry, 8, 2821 (1969).

(6)   Schwartz, W. E.,  "Chemical Characterization of Model Aerosols",
     Battelle-CoLumbus Laboratories,  Final Report  to the U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Grant No. 801174, (August, 1974).
                                     53

-------
             APPENDIX A

    METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF
  COMPOUNDS OBSERVED ON THE GC-MS
ANALYSIS (FIGURE 10) OF TOLUENE AEROSOL,
      DERIVATIZED WITH BSTFA
                    54

-------
                                        IK
                                        IS
  i	T	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r
goteeoeD6fieosoveeozot
            UGd 3SHB JO 39UlKXftOd
                                         g
                                        I?
                                       - • o
                                       "l8
                                       = lfi
                                         -P
                                                                                                   • o
                                                                                                   _ro
                                                                                                  IB
                                                                                     i	r
                                                                     MGd 3SH8 JO 39UUOUSd
                                                                                            et
IB
 IB
 • o
 •8

 '8
 'S
 •8
 "S

 15
 '§
 - D
 •8
 18
                                            55

-------
e>
—
—
-



~~.
_
-

_
-
31
§ :
K - ^
^ t— 	
e '
"• ix
o o o ~
3 o o
O XX

f j
I
b
r-*
S —
^
₯ ^
u

IB
"8
_(N
IB
IE
18
-N
18
Ifi
• o
"s
-IN
'ft
_
'S
~
18
.?
1?
._
IS
• o


L"
iR
Is
LsS
•f
S
( ( i i I i ( l l i
^Qd 3SH8 JO 3SHiK33U3d
















(VJ

§
E

O
g
t
f
D
8 i
1 U.
S! r.
w s
5= 	
*J jP
D) G5
	
	 =S









•SS5









(—
!
I ~~
8 g
°\=/ ° 2




—


_ »•»
< o
• o
=
ft>
.^
• ;

J
J
J
0

ff)
•s
J

-•"
•g
• E>
t-
"o


c*
' S
• g
0
.
-•

-"-
'
19
                  001
                                    3SUB JO 33bOQ3H3d
56

-------







,
§
UI 
Q 0 x
C
I
U.

^
I



	 — ^
— 	 «• — '
..... !•'
.TSS
^•i








-.

• 0
IS
- ID
_**)
"H
• ••
_r*
A g
S-r1 a
w
E
-2 g
3 I
-; I
« P f
K i
' ? ' h
-" C °
•s §
D) ID
• ID
_- r
•g oot
L»
rr-
_v c
— *n



8
--8
• o
;8
__
IS
-5.^
_-'«
_,__^- * 2
- • c
w O
5 - ~"
o ;
LJ
(\J C
x — _w
u
.
_8
'15
I i i i f i i i i
Q608Q/.QSQSQt0COZ&l 0
\4j"Tj "acyfl JTJ *ynHlMT!tf;Lj


  .
MbBd aSUB JO 39blN33kOd
                                      57

-------
                                                IB
                                                18


                                                18
                                                 o
                                                 .N
.   t
i
m
    s  -
                                               -•8
                                              = 'R
                                               = '8
_,.«
     001   06   08   OL   03  OS  0V  BE  OZ  01
                  MdBd 3SH8 JO 3SUlN3>Gd
                     e
                     a

                     y
                                                                  18
                                                                  • 
-------
            APPENDIX B

    METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF
  COMPOUNDS TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED
ON THE GC-MS ANALYSIS (FIGURE 15) OF
       VAPORS ASSOCIATED WITH
      TOLUENE/NO /SO  AEROSOLS
                X   £-
                  61

-------
       SPECTFU1  H -  8
       GC-tIS COW OF TQUBC NOX SOX flEBOSOL  JZS-J
  8J
feSJ
     60  70   88  30   100 110  120  130  110  1S0  160 170
                                   62

-------
      SPECTRUM 116 - 112
      GC-*S COW OF TOJUENE NOX SOX flEROSQL  J2S-1
8.
S.
0
o
        T'"I'"Tmi
        70   80
        M/E
      "iT"n""|»»i""|" •i»»|»»i»"|»»i»"|""i"»|"'T*"j
90   100  110  120  130  110  1S0  160  170  1
60
                                     63

-------
g
8.
€?
co ^
8.
     SPECTRUM 11S - 137
     GCHS COW OF TO.UENE NOX SOX flEBDSQL  J2S-1
          W
              4r
tMi
4r
     "'""I
   60   70
80   90   100  110  120  130
               150  160  170  1
        tire
                                 64

-------
      SPECTRUM 2S1 - 2S2
g
      GO-MS COW OF TOLUENE NOX SOX flEROSOL  J2S-1
O
  mrnTrmn*
60   70   80
     M/E
t^
                    h
tt
LmrmUl

                    |""|"M ^JTTTJ.T.IJTTHJir.TJTTTTJt.r, r.,.fnTTpTTjnTTIFmiTTlTJTTTTyn

                  90   100   110  120  130  ItO  ISO  160  170
                                 65

-------
      SPECTflUh 267 - 261
g
     GCH6
OF TOLUENE NOX SOX flEROSQL  J2S-1
w— • «^«
8_
8_
L
g8_
5?"
1s.
S.
0
•^ ~
o _





mi 	 uiiiltriniiliiiinlll





llniniiiiilHtiMimihiliiiiiiuhin!






   60   70   80
        M/E
 30   100  110  120  130  IfO  ISO  160  170  1
                                 66

-------
       as£CTRUM 283 - 276
       GO-flS COW) OF TOLUENE NOX SO* flEBDSOL  J2S-1
 ;£j
feS
Sp
  8
  8J
     63  TO  80   SO  KB  110  120 130  110  ISO  160  170 180  130  2C
         M/E
                               67

-------
       SPECTRUM 292 - 287
       OC-MS COW OF TOLUENE N9X SOX flERQSQL  J2S-I
 8.
§*-
ss_
 8u
 o
      M.l.MH.mpM.pMIMM,!!,.
     60   70   80   30
          M/E
L,.n,r,|,..,r	,f
                    IMI|WfltTttf^TtttTtHl|*?ltJI1JI|Tirrii
100  110  120  130  110  150  160  170  1
                                     63

-------
                                                   18
                                                    8
U)
T.
T
O
O
                           1
                                (
                                    I
   i    1    1     I    (

 001   06  06   06   09  05   &V   06
                MOd 3Sye JO 39yjX33b3d
                                                                       §
                           e
                           O
                           s
                                                                                      to
                                                                                      5

                                                                   :
01    0
                                                                        00!
                                               —i	r

                                                3SH8 JO
                                                         59

-------
                                       —:se

                                           18

                                           18
                                         'g - e>
                                          ~ —C1"

                                          .IP
                                                                                                 jr
                                                                                                 18
                                                                                                 .8'
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                 _m
                                           LS
                                                                                                     ill
                                                                                                       • o
                                                                                                       _K
                                                                                                      T8
                                           •g
                                           _N

                                           '8
                                                                                                ti
GE
a
            \=/
te

   r
 eoi
 i    i    i    i    i    r    i    r
oeoew.Q9osDVQ€ez
            3S«8 JO 3SWJK»Gd
                                            P
                                     01
                                                      jfi


                                                      E
                                                      Q

                                                      S
                                                            a
                                                            c
                                                   §  I

                                                   '   b
                                                   S  5
                                                   ^  5

                                                                                    ~r
                                                                                        ~r
                                                             001   06   06
 i    i    n~  n
OL   09   os   w   ee  oz   ci
MbQd 3SH8 JO 39HiK33k£3d
                                                   60

-------
       SPECTRUM 336 - 301
8
                     OF TOLUENE NOX SOX BEROSOL
                                                      ;-i
67
                   l
                              Tfd
1-rmf
                               I
Ti..,,., |,,M,.,..j»..,,n.r...,  ftmiv,.,,,,, j,^,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,.,.,,.,,,,.,.,,,.,,,...,
 100   110   120   130  110   ISO  160   170   180   190
  T"'|""I""J""I""|
60   70    80    30
      M/E
                                         69

-------
     aPECTHUH 311 - 311
     60*15 COtt3 OF TOLUENE NO* SOX BERDQOL J2S-1
8_
.J
R.
                                         1
Hi
   69  70   80  90   100  110  120  130 110  150  160  170  180  ISO  200
                                70

-------
8
      SPECTRUM 331-330
      GC-HS  COW OF TCLUOC NOX SOX PEPOSOL  J2S-1
•^
8.
8.
feS.
GCO
g<*5 *
8-
O
o .





mimiumiiimtiiliiimiiliiiiiMi
,...,t,ii|»...,.inH,i,,i..,,Mii,i.i.j










IM J. Jl, mil h 1
..|....,....|... (....i....,...^....,.!.!^!!!^..^.!!^!!.^.
   60   70   80   90   100  110  120  13(3  110  150  160  170  180  190  20
                                 71

-------
              368 - 363
      Gc-tis co-tn OF TQLUQC NO* sox POCSO.  025-1
!£J

    60   70   80  30   100 110  120 130  110  ISO  160  170  1
                                72

-------
              APPENDIX C

      METHANE IONIZATION SPECTRA OF
COMPOUNDS OBSERVED ON THE GC-MS ANALYSIS
     (FIGURE 16 ) OF VAPORS ASSOCIATED
      WITH 1-HEPTENE/NO /SO, AEROSOLS
                       X   £,
                  73

-------
SPECTRUM 17 -   9
1-4GPTDE NOX SOX   Hi
"••
8.
-
EP.
feS.
I'-
8-
o
•7 .





,— 1





ff|f>1*|l ffl VIKVIIVI





III
10   SO  60
     H/E
            70
30   100  110  120
                          74

-------
     SPECTRUM  21 -  21
8
     1-H3TBC NOX SOX    HI
8.
8.
j£O
EL r ^
tiJO
8 -
io
i/> -
l?_
|y* 5?
raco _
8.
C
** «„
o „





-nnJ





UUmi ll 	 1 	 1 1 	 n.,1 	 1 	 .Ml...
10   SO  60   70
     M/E
                      80  30   108  110  120
                              75

-------
        SPECTRUM  32-27
  8
I*.
  8
  O

  O
        1-HEPTQC NOX SOX     HI
llLpnJfl,
           IIf IVI r*»|IfI•••*V
           SO   63   70
           M/E
J4
                                      fW
4
,,.,,.l,,,.|,,,.,, ,.j.,.,,„„,,,„,,.,.!,,„,.,.,,.„.,,,„,„„,..,.,.,..,,..M
 80   90   100   110  120  130   110  ISO  160
                                       76

-------
                 1S3 - H7
  B
v-p
CC^^ ••


i«ig>

s  -


feS.
 18 _
 »



  R.


  O
        1-tCFTBC NOX SOX    Ml
          T
     10   SO   GO   70   80   90

           M/E
            .,...T,.,,,,,.r,M,,,T,,M,,,,r..,.„,,....,....,

100  110  120   130  110  ISO  160  170
                                      77

-------
       SP8CTHUM 178 - 171
  8
  8.
       1-UEFTOC NOX SOX   Ml
feS _
bj
  S.
  o

            (t
Vhmmtml
tttrnnrnifi
,WH
               .,...,|,.»J»° .,,...J.,..,.,,, ..M..,.|..,,r...|,.rM.rTT|.,.,|frf.fTTTTTT..F|..'.|..
     10  SO   GO   70  80   30  100  110  120  130  110  ISO
         M/E
                               78

-------
         SPECTRUM 218 - 209
         1-HEPTQC NCW SOX    HI
  8.
feS.
                     rl
fc
      ,...,,„,.,.,..,....,.
      10    SO   60   70
            MAE
III	.J|l
rfr
*
          .|i..ir...|ft..|i.i.|f...|.ii.|rr*.|i.»|fiffp»T|impTTi|rirTpnrTj
     80   30    100  110  120   130  110  ISO   160
                                          79

-------
                              TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                        (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/3-76-085
                                                   3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MODEL  AEROSOLS
                                5. REPORT DATE
                                   Iuly__1916_
                                                   6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  W.E. Schwartz, G.D. Mendenhall,  P.W.Jones,
  C. J. Riggle,  A.P. Graffeo, and D.F.  Miller
                                                   8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Battelle-Columbus Laboratories
  505 King Avenue
  Columbus,  Ohio  43201
                                                    10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                   R801174
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental  Sciences  Research  Laboratory
  Office of  Research and  Development
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park,  NC  27711
                                 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                 Final  6/74   4/76
                                 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                     EPA-ORD
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
       Model  aerosols were generated  from the  individual  hydrocarbons,
  toluene and 1-heptene,  by irradiation under  simulated  atmospheric
  conditions  in the presence of NO  ,  or NO  /SO .   The  reactions were
  carried out in a 17.3  m^ environmental chamber.   The collected
  aerosols were subjected to analysis by mass  spectrometry and chroma-
  tographic techniques,  both with and without  chemical derivatization.
  Polyfunctional oxidation products,  including quinones  and carboxylic
  acid, were  tentatively  identified  in the  toluene aerosol.  The  1-hep-
  tene filtered aerosol  was shown to  contain condensation products  from
  different 1-heptene molecules.  Tentative identification of a number
  of vapor-phase species  was accomplished in both  systems. The health
  effects of  the atmospheric oxidation products from hydrocarbons  is
  discussed.
17.
                            KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
                                        b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                            c.  COS AT I Field/Group
   Air pollution
  *Toluene
  *Heptenes
  *Aerosols
  *Environment  Simulation
*Photochemical
  react ions
*Chemical  analysis
  13B
  07C
  07D
  14B
  07E
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  RELEASE TO PUBLIC
                     19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                      UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO OF PAGES
    88
                                        20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)

                                         UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                22 PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                      80

-------