PB-239 510

COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL  REPORT ON
ALL ATMOSPHERIC  CONTAMINANTS  ASSO-
CIATED WITH  PHOTOCHEMICAL AIR  POLLUTION

Lowell G.  Wayne,  et al

System Development Corporation
Prepared for:

National  Environmental Research  Center


June  1970
                        DISTRIBUTED BY:
                       National Technical Information Service
                       U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before complet'""1
 1. REPORT NO.
; EPA-650/4-75-002
                             2.
                                                          3   PB   239   510  ,
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Comprehensive Technical Report on  all  Atmospheric
  Contaminants Associated with Photochemical  Air
  Pollution.
                                                          6. REPORT DATE
                                                           June  1970
                                                          6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
                                                                                         y>
7. AUTHOR(S)
 Lowell G. Wayne, Robert  J.  Bryan, Mel Weisburd and
 Roy Danchick
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT

 TM-(L)-UUll/002/01
I. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
 System Development  Corporation
 2500 Colorado Ave.
 Santa Monica,  CA   90i*06
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11.
                                                            CPA 22-69-108
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental Protection Agency
  National Environmental Research Center
  Research Triangle Park,  NC  27711
                                                          13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                          14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
         This  document analyzes the interrelationships of contaminant, environmental
  and source factors involved in the total photochemical pollution system.  The
  intent  is  tc generalize the principles and  techniques of photochemical-environmental
  appraisal  — developed first in Los Angeles, where this problem has been most
  studied — for application to other regions of the United States.  Specifically,
  this document analyzes illustrative applications  of techniques for appraising  air
  quality and  predicting its trends.  These techniques include, especially,
  multivariate statistical analysis of information  obtained from air monitoring, and
  simulation modeling for studying future interactions of reactive contaminants.
17.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                             b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                       c.  COSATI Field/Group
 Air Pollution
 Photochemical  Reactions
 Monitors
 Forecasting
 Simulation
                                              Los Angeles
                                 (Unreduced by
                                 NATIONAL TECHNICAL
                                 INFORMATION SERVICE
                                    U S Department of Commerce
                                      Springfield VA 22151
              Ok A
              07D
                                                           PRICES SUBJ
              a TO CHANGE
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
          Unlimited
                                             19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                                                 Unclassified
                                                                        21. NO. OF PAGES
                                             20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                 Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------
                                   EPA-650/4-75-Q02
  COMPREHENSIVE  TECHNICAL  REPORT
ON  ALL  ATMOSPHERIC CONTAMINANTS
            ASSOCIATED WITH
    PHOTOCHEMICAL  AIR  POLLUTION
                      by
            Lowell G. Wayne, Robert J. Bryan,
             Mel Weisburd and Roy Danchick

              System Development Corporation
                 2500 Colorado Avenue
              Santa Monica, California 90406
               Contract No. CPA 22-96-108
            EPA Project Officer: J. C. Romanovsky

                 Office of the Director
            National Environmental Research Center
          Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
                    Prepared for

           OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
          U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

                    June 1970

-------
                  RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES


Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, have been grouped into series. These broad
catfgories were established to facilitate further development and applica-
tion of environmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was
consciously planned to foster technology transfer and maximum interface
in related fields. These series are:

          1. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH
          2.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY

          3.  ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH

          4.  ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
          5.  SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
          6.  SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS
          9.  MISCELLANEOUS

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
series.  This series describes research conducted to develop new or
improved methods and instrumentation for the identification and quanti-
fication of environmental pollutants at the lowest conceivably significant
concentrations. It also includes studies to determine the ambient con-
centrations of pollutants in the environment 'and/or the variance of
pollutants as a function of time or meteorological factors.
                               ,b

-------
                        EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the National Environmental Research
Center - Research Triangle Park, Office of Research and Development,
EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval do is not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
This document is available to the public for sale through the National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
                                  11

-------
                                 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

System Development Corporation wishes to express appreciation to the many
individuals who assisted in the preparation of this document.

We are particularly indebted to L. Wayne and R. Bryan, SDC Principal Consulting
Investigators, for their enthusiasm, skills and the long hours spent in the
preparation and review of this volume.  Dr. Wayne's work, previously performed
under PHS Grant AP0064103, formed the basis for the chemical kinetics module now
contained in the environmental simulation model developed by SDC for this
project.  Robert Bryan's efforts were largely responsible for the comprehensive
treatment of the state-of-the-art with respect to the monitoring and control
of the sources of photochemical pollutants.

SDC consultants contributing major sections of this document included
J. Edinger, S. Frank, R. Glater, R. Gordon, A. Gosselin, Jr., L. Grunder,
S. Jaffe, E. Kauper, R. Kopa, E. Schuck, and J. Seinfeld.

We are also grateful for the invaluable comments and suggestions received from
numerous individuals in NAPCA, particularly D. Earth, J. Romanovsky, B. Turner,
E. Schuck, G. Morgan, S. Goldberg, and many others.

Members of the SDC staff included R. Danchick, A. Kokin, M. Rogers, R. Enright,
and A. Stein.  Mr. Danchick designed the framework and developed many of the
mathematical equations used in the simulation model and established the design
of the statistical analyses reported in Chapter 6.  Mr. Kokin programmed and
debugged the model for the IBM 360/67.  M. Rogers and R. Enright programmed
features of the data management and statistical processing systems for the
statistical analyses performed for this project.  A. Stein, Assistant Project
Manager, assisted in the scheduling and coordination of the various tasks of
this project.

                                       M. I. Weisburd
                                       Project Manager
                                    iii

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter

   1     THE PHOTOCHEMICAL AIR POLLUTION COMPLEX

         A.  INTRODUCTION
         B.  PHENOMENOLOGY OF PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG
         C.  BASIC CONCEPTS OF AIR QUALITY RELATIVE TO
               PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG

   2     SOURCES, PRINCIPLES OF CONTROL, AND NATURE OF
           PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS

         A.  INTRODUCTION
         B.  NATURAL SOURCES AND BACKGROUND LEVELS OF
               PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS
         C.  NATIONAL AND REGIONAL EMISSION LEVELS
         D.  TECHNOLOGICAL SOURCES OF HYDROCARBONS AND
               NITROGEN OXIDES
         E.  PRINCIPLES OF HYDROCARBON AND NITROGEN
               OXIDES CONTROL
         F.  NATURE OF PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS
         G.  REACTIVITY OF HYDROCARBONS IN THE PHOTOCHEMI
               SMOG COMPLEX
         H.  PROPERTIES OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN

   3     ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS AND METEOROLOGY

         A.  INTRODUCTION
         B.  CLIMATOLOGY AND AIR MASS BEHAVIOR
         C.  TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION
         D.  TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS
         E.  SOLAR RADIATION

   4     ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS
         A.  INTRODUCTION
         B.  PRINCIPLES OF PHOTOCHEMICAL PRIMARY REACTIONS
         C.  ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS
         D.  A THESAURUS OF PROPOSED REACTIONS IN THE URBAN
               PHOTOCHEMICAL SYSTEM
         E.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE
               PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTION ri
-------
Chapter                                                                Page

   5     AIR QUALITY APPRAISAL                                         5-1

         A.  INTRODUCTION                                              5-10
         B.  GENERAL SAMPLING AND STANDARDIZATION METHODS              5-11
         C.  NON-NITROGENOUS  OXIDANTS                                  5-14
         D.  SPECIFIC OZONE METHODS                                    5-21
         E.  OXIDES OF NITROGEN                                        5-23
         F.  GASEOUS ORGANIC  POLLUTANTS                                5-25
         G.  PEROXYACYL NITRATES                                       5-30
         H.  AEROSOLS AND ATMOSPHERIC TURBIDITY                        5-31
         I.  BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS                                     5-36
         J.  AIR QUALITY DATA                                          5-38
         K.  DATA ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINING
               REGIONAL AIR QUALITY                                    5-109

   6     MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF AIR QUALITY AND
           ENVIRONMENTAL DATA                                          6-1

         A.  INTRODUCTION                                              6-5
         B.  DATA ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT                           6-5
         C.  THE STATISTICAL  PROGRAM SYSTEM                            6-10
         D.  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                    6-22

   7     DIGITAL SIMULATION OF PHOTOCHEMICAL POLLUTION                 7-1

         A.  INTRODUCTION                                              7-4
         B.  THE REACTIVE POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SIMULATION
               MODEL (REM)                                             7-6
         C.  CURRENT STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
               OF THE MODEL                                            7-12
         D.  MODEL VALIDATION                                          7-13
         E.  APPLICATION OF THi. , ODEL                                  7-26

   APPENDIX I:   RESULTS OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS                        1-1

   APPENDIX II:  MATHEMATICAL  DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL                  II-l

-------
                                 CHAPTER 1




                   THE PHOTOCHEMICAL AIR POLLUTION COMPLEX






                                                                         Page






A.  INTRODUCTION                                                          1-3




    1.  Scope                                                             1-3




    2.  Background                                                        1-3




B.  PHENOMENOLOGY OF PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG                                   1-5




    1.  Impairment of Visibility                                          1-5




    2.  Discoloration of the Atmosphere                                   1-7




    3.  Eye Irritation and Other Forms of Human Discomfort                1-8




    4.  Damage to Vegetation                                              1-9




    5.  Damage to Materials                                               1-10




    6.  Effects on Human Health                                           1-10




    7.  Population Reactions                                              1-12




C.  BASIC CONCEPTS OF AIR QUALITY RELATIVE TO PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG          1-13




    1.  Primary Contaminants                                              1-20




    2.  Atmospheric Reactions                                             1-21
                                     1-1

-------
                                 CHAPTER 1

                               LIST OF FIGURES



Figure                                                                 Page

 1-1       Generalized Scheme of Principal Components of the           1-16
           Photochemical Air Pollution System, Illustrating
           the Relationship between Sources, Secondary Contaminant
           Emissions, Atmospheric Reactions, Primary (in
           Brokea Boxes) and Secondary Contaminant Outputs and
           Receptor Effects.

1-2        Diurnal Variation in Hourly Average Concentration           1-19
           for each Hour for Four Contaminants Measured at
           Downtown Los Angeles—September 3, 1964.
                                     1-2

-------
A.  INTRODUCTION




    1.  Scope




          This document Is a reflection of the literature on the origin and




effects of a group of atmospheric contaminants known collectively as photo-




chemical air pollution or photochemical smog.  Mr Quality Criteria documents




currently being prepared describe available scientific Information concerning




the effects of numerous contaminants on health and welfare; they also provide




appraisal of the environmental aspects of the problem.




          This document analyzes the interrelationships of contaminant,




environmental and source factors involved in the total photochemical pollution




system.  The intent is to generalize the principles and techniques of photo-




chemical-environmental appraisal—developed first in Los Angeles, where this




problem has been most studied—for application to other regions of the




United States.  Specifically, this document analyzes illustrative applications




of techniques for appraising air quality and predicting its trends.  These




techniques include, especially, multivarlate statistical analysis of




information obtained from air monitoring, and simulation modeling for




studying future interactions of reactive contaminants.




    2.  Background



          While many of the causative factors of photochemical smog are well




known, gaps and complexities still remain.  After nearly 20 years of research,




Lho processes underlying photochemical smog are only partially understood.
                                     1-3

-------
Problems remain in obtaining accurate,  representative and systematically




generated data that sensitively measure the effects of the parameters; in




extrapolating from experimental results in static chambers to ambient




conditions; and in completing information on chemical details of the photo-




chemical system.  Furthermore, methodological problems are involved in




analyzing all of the concurrent factors and interactions.



          Photochemical air pollution has its origin in a number of atmospheric




contaminants which, through the intermediacy of solar radiation, undergo marked




change in the atmosphere.  The chemical change results from & complex host of




individual chemical reactions, each of which proceeds at its own characteristic




rate determined by factors of solar intensity, temperature, and concentration




of reacting chemical entities.  Most (or all) of these reactions occur simul-




taneously; many are interdependent; some are competitive.  The primary contami-




nants involved in the complex—that is, those contaminants which are mainly




consumed in the course of the reactions and whose presence is apparently




necessary for the development of the photochemical smog complex—are certain




oxides of nitrogen and a multitude of hydrocarbons and other organic gases.



The organic gases vary widely in concentration and reactivity; consequently,




there are wide differences in the degree of their involvement in the photo-




chemical system.




          Photochemical smog is the generic term applied to the dynamic




atmospheric system at any stage of this reaction complex,  Ii; coi^.ises aot




only the essential primary contaminants referenced above, but also any other
                                     1-4

-------
primary contaminants (such as oxides of sulfur, carbon monoxide, or particulate




matter) which may react with any other components of the complex, as well as




a great variety of reaction products.





B.  PHENOMENOLOGY OF PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG




          Photochemical smog is characterized phenomenologically by impairment




of visibility, discoloration of the atmosphere, eye irritation, and damage to




vegetation and property.  Several of the smog constituents responsible for




some of these effects have been identified, but the elucidation has not been




completed.  It is therefore necessary, in considering such effects, to attempt




to relate them wherever possible to other parameters of the atmospheric system




(such as the concentrations of primary contaminants).





    1.   Impairment  of Visibility




          Visibility reduction is one of the most commonly observed manifesta-




tions of urban air pollution.  It is caused by the scattering and absorption




of light by particles in the atmosphere and depends in a complicated way on




the concentration and properties of those particles.





          Particles are present in photochemical smog as primary contaminants




from urban sources such as industrial combustion and vehicular transportation,




and from natural sources such as sea and soil.  Additional material accumulates




on particles as a result of the smog reactions, so  that the particles become
                                     1-5

-------
larger, scatter light more copiously, and thts interfere"more with visibility.




This additional material, existing in the liquid state, is referred to as




photochemical aerosol.





          The extent of interference with visibility produced by the smog-




generated aerosol depends to an unknown extent on the relative humidity of




the affected air mass.  One operational criterion for an adverse effect of




smog, as stated by the California State Air Quality Standards, is the presence




of participate matter sufficient to reduce visibility to less than 3 miles




when relative humidity is less than 70 percent.  Under the climatological




regime of the Los Angeles Basin, days sunny enough for photochemical smog




usually have less than 70 percent relative humidity, and the aerosol gives




the appearance of a thick yellowish haze.  In 1967, this State Standard




was exceeded in Los Angeles County on 190 days.




          Despite the fact that photochemical smog is usually formed in warm,




dry weather, it is not unlikely that the aerosol can persist into nighttime




hours and intensify radiation fogs formed in situ in the affected air mass.




Thus fog, while not a useful indication of the prevalence of photochemical



smog, may be an occasional consequence of it.  It is of interest to note that




smog days in the Los Angeles Basin, according to the Air Pollution Control




District, frequently start with fog along the coast at sunrise.




          While it is clear that photochemical smog impairs visibility, it is




not clear how  this effect is ra.l;tLc "r,c the concentric ions and other parameters




of  the photochemical complex.  Studies of the chemical composition of aerosol
                                     1-6

-------
material obtained from atmospheric sampling in 1952 showed the presence of




organic compounds; these presumably were formed by the photochemical reaction




system from hydrocarbons and other organic gas primary contaminants.  In the




inorganic portion of the particulate matter sulfates are commonly found, which




may arise in part from the participation of gaseous sulfur dioxide in the




photochemical reaction system.  Likewise, nitrates occur, which may result




from reactions involving the oxides of nitrogen.  There is no information as




to the importance of these aerosol constituents relative to the impairment




of visibility in photochemical smog.





    2.  Discoloration of the Atmosphere




          In episodes of photochemical smog the contaminated air takes on




various colors—depending on the conditions under which it is viewed—ranging




from dull blue through yellow to a dirty brown.  Like the impairment of




visibility, these discoloration effects are caused mostly by the light-




scattering properties of particles in the atmosphere.  However, one smog




constituent—namely nitrogen dioxide—is a colored gas and, if present in




sufficiently high concentrations and in a sufficiently extensive air mass,




would be expected to color the atmosphere to orange-brown.  It is not known




whether the necessary conditions for observation of this phenomenon have ever




existed in an ambient atmosphere, but the observed color of photochemical smog



is frequently consistent with the hypothesis that nitrogen dioxide contributes




significantly to its appearance.  In view of this effect, quantitative
                                     1-7

-------
estimates of the degree of coloration to be expected led the California Air




Resources Board to set a nitrogen dioxide concentration of 0.25 ppm as an




adverse level.




    3.  Eye Irritation and other Forms of Human Discomfort



          Among manifestations directly affecting the human body, eye irritation




is the most readily detected by people exposed to photochemical sno^.  In




episodes of severe smog, over three-quarters of the inhabitants may observe




irritation of the eyes, while a small proportion complain of irritation of




nose or throat, or of chest discomfort, especially during exercise.  Respon-




dents in a survey in California, as reported by Hausknecht,  Identified




eye irritation as the most prevalent effect of air pollution.  Other effects




cited were nose and throat irritation, cough and sinus symptoms, discomfort




or difficulty in breathing, headache, and annoyance due to odor or other




qualities of the atmosphere.  Presumably most of the air pollution inculpated




by these respondents was photochemical in nature.





          Since it was first established that eye irritation is caused by



photochemical smog, much research has been expended in an attempt to identify




the particular constituents responsible.  These irritants have a direct effect




on a  large proportion of the Los Angeles population and thus have been investi-




gated quite extensively.  While studies have revealed a great deal of informa-




tion  concerning human response variables, they have yielded  little  In regard

-------
to Lhe mechanism of irritation, nor has the identification of the chemical



spec Los responsible been completed.  Some photochemical products known to


c.iu.se eye irritation, however, are formaldehyde, acrolein, and peroxyacetyl


nitrate.



    4.  Damage to Vegetation


          Plant damage as a result of photochemical smog was observed in the


Los Angeles area in the early 1940's and since has been found increasingly in


many other places.   Such damage takes many forms, both obvious and subtle.


It has its economic effects on plants by reducing crop yield, marking and


dehydrating the foliage of leafy crops, retarding growth, or causing outright


destruction.   Damage to foliage is best understood because it was noticed first,


be in); most obvious to ilie naked eye.  The visible injury symptoms on the leaves


of plants attributable to photochemical air pollution can be divided into three


categories:  cell collapse with subsequent collapse and killing of tissues


(acute injury); chlorosis (yellowing) or other color changes (chronic injury);


and growth alteration, reduced yields and change in quality.  The peculiar


type of injury to leafy vegetables, ornamentals and field crops now character-


ized by such symptoms as banding, silvering and stippling of the leaves was

                                      2
first investigated by Middleton et al.  in 1944 in a small area of


Los Angeles County.  By 1950, such injury had spread over a large area of


Southern California and in the San Francisco Bay Area.  This kind of plant


injury has also spread to many widely separated areas of the United States


with  increased severity and associated economic losses to both farmers and


nurserymen.
                                     1-9

-------
          Annual crop damage from photochemical air pollution has been estimated


at $8 million in California and $18 million on the eastern seaboard.   Many


crops are damaged in New York's Staten Island, e.g. begonias, tobacco, potatoes,
                          i

while tobacco in Connecticut and spinach in New Jersey are being continuously


destroyed.  Plant damage has been most intensive in Los Angeles County—in

                                                            4
some areas on as many as 70 percent of the days of the year.   Ozone,


peroxyacetvl nitrates (PAN), and nitrogen dioxide are the known photochemically


produced phytotoxicants.  Under ordinary conditions of exposure to photochemical


smog the effects of these agents cannot easily be differentiated, and it is


possible that other phytotoxic agents may be present.  However, laboratory


investigations and controlled field exposures have provided a substantial


knowledge of the effects of these particular agents.



    5.  Damage to Materials


          Damage to structural metals, surface coatings, fabrics, and other


materials is a frequent effect of air pollution.  In photochemical smog,


destruction is mainly attributable to oxidants of various kinds, particularly


Oo» which is known to cause rapid and extensive damage to rubber and  textile


goods.   The cracking of  stressed rubber was used on early  studies as a


measure of ozone.



     6.  Effects on Human Health


          Toxicology has  shown that  photochemical  smog  contains  substances,


mainly  among  the secondary cor^wi..ir.anv.-,, which have a substantial  potential
                                      1-10

-------
to h.irm people and animals, and epidemiology has revealed some of the ways in




which such smog adversely affects people.  Toxic components include ozone,




nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde and other aldehydes, and peroxyacetyl nitrates.




Doubtless many of the less abundant products, such as peroxides and alkyl




nitrates, could also be characterized as toxic.





          In epidemiological studies,  photochemical smog has been




Incriminated as a cause of irritation of the eyes and upper respiratory tract,




of decreased efficiency in the performance of physical and mental tasks, of




difficulty or discomfort in breathing, and a variety of other detrimental




effects.  Difficulty in breathing is experienced especially by people with




preexisting respiratory impairment from emphysematous or bronchitic conditions.




In guinea pigs, total pulmonary resistance is increased during photochemical




smog episodes, with older animals being more severely affected.





          Results of epidemiologic studies suggest that photochemical smog




may evoke temporary physiological responses but little permanent effect on




people in normal health.  As mentioned above, asthma, emphysema and bronchitis




may be exacerbated by exposure to smog.  Animal experiments have shown that




exposures to ozone or nitrogen dioxide may enhance susceptibility to




infectious agents.




          Studies of the relation of photochemical smog to death rates in




California, where this type of smog has been especially well documented,




reveal a substantial increase in general mortality among the aged in episodes
                                     1-11

-------
of hot weather, usually associated with smog.  High temperatures seem to be



a more important causative factor than air pollution, judging by the strength




of statistical association among these factors.



    7.  Population Reactions



          The possible reactions of the public to photochemical air pollution



may be understood in terms of the reactions  of the Los Angeles public to this



problem.  The extensive number of complaints, action of citizens' groups,




editorial reaction, media coverage, and the  continuing notoriety and publicity



given to this problem over the past 20 years attest to the extent and intensity



of public attitude to this form of pollution.




          While  the cause of public attitudes in Los Angeles have been



insufficiently studied in depth, a number of apparently obvious contributing



factors can be generalized from the history  of this problem:




            1.   The problem is dramatically  visible to the entire public



                 throughout the metropolitan  area.






            2.   Smog haze interferes with visibility, obscures views of the



                 mountains and sea and  other  familiar portions of the



                 Los Angeles area, and  produces an  undesirable discoloration



                 of the sky—even when  sunny  and cloudless.   Smog thus clearly



                 interferes with  the enjoyment  of scenic attributes  that are



                 of primary social value  in  the Los Angeles area.
                                      1-12

-------
            3.   Smog produces a physiological response—eye irritation (and




                possibly other responses)—that directly affects a significant




                proportion of the population.






            4.   The objective manifestations of smog have caused almost




                universal concern that smog may be damaging health.





c-  Basic Concepts of Air Quality Relative to Photochemical Smog



          For practical purposes, the important aspects of air quality are




those that relate to the effects of air on organisms, and the senses,, sensibilities,




and pocketbooks of people; various such aspects have been discussed in the




preceding pages.  To deal quantitatively with these relations, it is necessary




to study the responses of various types of sensors—human, animal, vegetable,




and material—when exposed to various concentrations of contaminants for




various periods of time.  (The results of such studies are presented in




documents known as Air Quality Criteria.)  The effects to be expected




in a given community as a result of impaired air quality can be predicted




from estimates of the concentrations of contaminants at sensor locations.




These concentrations, in turn, can be estimated if enough detail is known




concerning locations of the sources of contaminants and the variables




governing their distribution in the atmosphere.




         For contaminants which undergo no chemical change after being




emitted into the atmosphere, methods of estimating concentrations are based




mainly on certain straightforward simplifications of recognized principles of
                                     1-13-

-------
atmospheric transport, assuming that contaminant molecules are indestructible.




For reacting contaminants or for contaminants formed by reactions in the




atmosphere, concentrations cannot be predicted unless chemical behavior is




considered.  Thus, the estimation of contaminant concentrations and the




prediction of the effects of those contaminants on the sensors within a




community or region are more complicated and difficult for reacting contami-




nants than for those which are chemically inert.




          In the photochemical air pollution complex some of the effects are




related to the history of concentrations of the emitted contaminants, which




are reduced by their involvement in atmospheric chemical reactions; other




effects are related to concentrations of contaminants which are generated




in the atmosphere by those same reactions.  Reliable prediction of the




effects of these newly generated contaminants can only be accomplished if




the chemistry of the atmospheric reactions is understood in sufficient detail.




          In the photochemical air pollution complex, most of the atmospheric




reactions are insensitive to light and  take place on any suitable encounter



of a pair of reacting species.  However,  certain key reactions—known as




photochemical reactions—proceed only in  the presence of light, and  convert




the energy of the  light  into chemical energy which, as a consequence,




essentially fuels  all the chemical changes which occur in the contsmirated




atmosphere.
                                     1-14

-------
          In the ensuring discussion, contaminants will be referred to as




"primary" or "secondary" mainly on the basis of whether they are reactants




consumed, or products generated by the atmospheric reactions.  Primary




contaminants according to this definition include:  all organic vapors




and gases entering the atmosphere, except for a few believed unreactive;




nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide; and various adventitious contaminants




such as sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide and possibly others (gas, vapor, or




aerosol).  Secondary contaminants are any products of reactions involving




the primary contaminants.  (These include some compounds also eligible




as primary contaminants, especially nitrogen dioxide).  Among the secondary




contaminants are some chemical species of uncertain chemical identity,




sometimes detectable by chemical or physiological effects, and quantifiable




only by such effects (if at all).




          A schematic illustration depicting the principal components of the




piiotochemcial air pollution problem is shown in Figure 1-1.  Reactive contami-




nants are introduced into the system by various categories of human activities




(sources).  The contaminants are then subject to the actions of the atmospheric




environment and solar radiation with respect to transport accumulation and




dispersal and the enhancement or retardation of chemical reactions.  The




et feet of air pollution is determined by its influence on receptors—human,




animal, biological, and material.
                                     1-15

-------
           UJ

           0
                           z
                              55
                              O ui

                              HO
utt
 fc
„  £
£>z r-

5*1!
£Z2 '

38-

i^u
   o
    I
3 7
Q£j
!!
1 	
1
i y.
z

i
U-T-J
l___
PLANT DA
MATERIAL!
HEALTH EF


o
N


I








PLANT DA
MATERIAL
HEALTH Ef


-
O
~l
<
\








i Q
5S
e 3
S^


^



1








IVISIBILIT
REDUCTK
in
o
1/1
O

<

1
-
00
52i
<"
 > <


 <
   o
   o
  u
  oi


  o
                                                   ^-4




                                                  I H'
                                                    w
                                                    w
                                             M
                                             (U

                                             1-1


                                             00
                        1-16

-------
          In the production of smog the atmosphere acts as a chemical reactor




with inputs of materials and energy.  The contents of the atmospheric reactor




are transformed by the action of sunlight into the irritating and damaging




products characteristic of photochemical smog.  Inputs to the atmospheric




system, termed primary contaminants, are oxides of nitrogen (principally




nitric oxide (NO)) from automobile exhaust and stationary sources, and




organic gases (mainly hydrocarbons) from automobile exhaust.  The vast supply




of molecular oxygen in the air plays an important role in smog reactions;




other pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, may participate




in these reactions to a minor extent.  Materials produced by atmospheric




reactions are termed secondary contaminants; as such, they are responsible for




most of the effects associated with photochemical smog.





          The air and pollutants in the atmospheric system move with various




velocities and mix at various rates, depending on topography and atmospheric




heating as well as other weather variables.  Several factors affect reaction




rates among various species:  the sunlight intensity; the temperature; and




the degree of mixing that takes place once primary contaminants are intro-




duced into the atmosphere.  The variety of intermediate and final products




formed is quite large, including nitrogen dioxide (NOO, ozone (0-), aldehydes,




ketones, organic hydroperoxides, peroxacetyl nitrates, aerosols, and a number




of free radicals not experimentally measured but known to be intermediates in




the chemical reactions.
                                     1-17

-------
          Convection and dispersion have a significant influence on photochemical

amog reactions, since reaction rates depend on concentrations which are, in

turn, considerably affected by atmospheric mixing.   Roughly the same quantity

of primary contaminants is poured into the air of a city every weekday, the

smog severity being determined by prevailing meteorological conditions.  In

particular, photochemical smog formation is favored by light winds and

intense sunlight and by temperature inversions, which prevent mixing between

the lower and upper levels of the atmosphere.

          As Illustrated in Figure 1-2 and discussed below, contaminants in

typical Los Angeles smog episodes follow a fairly consistent pattern:

            •   Predawn.  During the predawn hours of the morning, the

                concentrations of primary contaminants, NO and hydrocarbons*

                increase slowly in the absence of wind.  The secondary

                contaminants, 0- and NO., remain at low levels.  (Before

                sunrise, the ratio of concentrations of NO- to NO may be one-

                tenth or less.)

            •   Morning.  As the sun rises, and with the injection of large

                quantities of NO and hydrocarbons from morning traffic, N0_

                is generated at a substantial rate.  The NO appears to convert

                rapidly and almost quantitatively to NO-.  When the NO is
*In addition to its technically correct chemical usage, the term "hydrocarbon"
 may be used in this document to include other organic gases.
                                     1-18

-------
50

40

q
-a 30
ex
X
a
cT1 20
x
p

10
0
• /,
1
/ N0
/ \
1 \ A
/ A/ \
/ 4 \ .
- A HC / / / 1 ^ — % » ''' "» ~
/ ^ V ) • \ \ \ *»
/ -\ ••/ f i \ Y\ A l
/ -^ X^ • \ /V\ \\
N°2 y ''•••..xx^ 	 f /
""r"T'T-T"T"T— r* i it — r— T— T-T~T-r~r-r"JT-T— i — r-n
15

12


9
t
P.
6 «



3
0
12
8   10   12
                                      4    6    8   10  .12
                       TIME OF DAY
  Figure 1-2.   DIURNAL VARIATION IN HOURLY AVERAGE
               CONCENTRATION FOR EACH HOUR FOR FOUR
               CONTAMINANTS MEASURED AT DOWNTOWN
               LOS ANGELES—SEPTEMBER 3, 1964.
                           1-1V

-------
                almost fully converted to N09,  0, begins to appear,  accumulates



                until sometime after noon, and  then gradually declines.  As



                the concentration of 0,. increases, the concentration of NO.



                decreases from its peak attained in the morning.



            •   Late Afternoon.  The late afternoon traffic injects  a fresh



                supply of NO and hydrocarbons into the atmosphere.  However,



                high concentrations of contaminants are not usually  seen at



                this time, largely because of dilution and displacement of



                air by the sea breeze.



     1.  Primary Contaminants



          The major classes of contaminants emitted into contemporary urban



atmospheres are:  (1) carbon monoxide; (2) particulate matter; (3) oxides



of sulphur; (4) oxides of nitrogen; and (5) organic gases.  Of these, the



oxides of nitrogen and organic gases are chiefly responsible for photochemical



smog, while the other contaminants participate in minor ways.



          Principal sources of the primary contaminants of photochemical smog



in most cities  (as indicated in Figure 1-1) are automobile exhaust and power



plant effluents, with smaller quantities of effluents arising from industry



and other sources.  Because gasoline combustion in the internal combustion



engine is usually less than 100 percent efficient, minor quantities of the



original fuel, partially oxidized fuel and unsaturated hydrocarbons arc exhause



constituents, along with CO  and H,0,  In addition, ritrogen and oxygen of
                           2.      L


the air combine chemically as in all high-temperature combustion processes



to form NO.  Automobile exhaust also contains particulate matter, emitted
                                      1-20

-------
at rates of billions of particles per second.  Particulates serve as condensation




nuclei for atmospheric aerosols, which may further contribute to the haze




manifestations of photochemical smog.




          Specific primary contaminants frequently function in a dual capacity.




Certain hydrocarbons, the oxides of nitrogen, and the oxides of sulfur are




undesirable pollutants in themselves in addition to participating in chemical




reactions which produce additional undesired byproducts.




     2.  Atmospheric Reactions




          Photochemical smog is produced by reactions involving NO, N0_,




organic gases and oxygen.  The smog formation process is chemically characterized




by:  (1) oxidation of NO to NO., (2) oxidation of organic gases to oxygenated




compounds, such as aldehydes and ketones, and (3) eventual accumulation of




ozone and other oxidants.




          It has been firmly established that the near-ultraviolet fraction




of sunlight is necessary to the formation of photochemical smog.  Detailed




consideration of the components of urban atmospheres isolates N0« as the




usual major absorber of the effective fraction of sunlight energy.  The result



ot this absorption is the photodissociation of N02> yielding nitric oxide
and oxygen atoms:
                                      N02 + hv •*• NO + 0
                                     1-21

-------
The oxygen atoms react predominantly with molecular oxygen, 0_, to form 0.,

                                           2     ^3
where M is a third body (any other molecule in the system).  NO and 0™
react rapidly to regenerate N02 and 02,
                                      NO + 0_ -»• N00 + 00
Each of these reactions is extremely fast—at least an order of magnitude
faster than other reactions occurring in the atmosphere.  There are several
other reactions involving NO, NO , 02, 0_ and other oxides of nitrogen, but
these three are generally regarded as the most important.  Stephens  has
calculated the 0, concentration that might be formed at steady state by
irradiating any mixture of NO, 0 , N0_ and 0_ in the absence of other species.
He estimates that 10 pphm of N02 in air could yield 2.7 pphm of 0,, together
with the same concentration of NO in each case.  This calculation was based
on initial zero NO, and these 0, concentrations are still far below those
sometimes found in polluted urban air.  In fact, most of the oxides of nitrogen
are emitted as NO which, when present, prevents any appreciable 0_ concentration
from being reached as a result of these reactions.  Thus, other reactions must
be contributing to the smog formation process.
          A process which is slow compared to these reactions but which
converts NO to N0? without consuming an equivalent amount of 0, can lead to
the accumulation of 0-.  The presence of reactive hydrocarbons proviri'3
such a process.  Both 0 and 0   *ave  the ability to react with  the oxidize
hydrocarbons.  The intermediate* formed in such reactions are highly  reactive
                                     1-22

-------
and readily participate in further reactions or decompose to yield free




radicals.  Free radicals, from the reaction of hydrocarbons with 0 and—in




smaller quantities—from the photodissociation of aldehydes, ketones and




certain other carbon compounds, are intermediates in the further reactions




of the photochemical smog system.




          The free radicals formed react avidly with 0 , NO, NO., hydrocarbons




and other free radicals.  Reactions with 0- tend to add the oxygen to the




radical to produce peroxy radicals.  Reactions of the oxygen-containing free




radicals with NO yield NO .   Reactions of the free radicals with NO




generally yield organic nitrates.  Reactions with hydrocarbons lead to larger




radicals.  Evidence of the reaction of hydrocarbons with 0 and 0. is based on




the abundance of oxygen-containing products which are observed in laboratory




simulations and in polluted air.  Organic nitrite and nitrate products, e.g.,




peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), provide evidence for the existence of free




radicals in the system.




          Thus the free radicals participate in a chain reaction mechanism




.uitiated by the reactions of hydrocarbons with 0 and 0_; propagated by the




reactions of radicals with 0_, NO, and fresh hydrocarbons; and terminated by




tlvlr reactions with N0? and other radicals.  The key aspect of the chain




reactions process is that formation of one free radical, for example, from




the reaction of 0 and a hydrocarbon, will result in many propagation steps




before termination.  A typical history of one such radical might be reaction




with NO to give NO  and another radical.  This radical then combines with 0
                                     1-23

-------
to replenish the oxygen lost to NO.  The oxygenated radical than participates




in a reaction with another NO molecule to generate NO-, resulting in many




molecules of NO converted to NO- for each free radical formed.  This process




provides the alternate path for oxidation of NO to NO. and subsequent accumulation




of 0..  The termination steps in the chain reaction explain the existence




of many of the oxygen-containing organic products found in polluted air ,




          The oxidation of nitric oxide is thus clearly a major consequence




of photochemical smog reactions.  At the same time, other contaminants which




happen to be present in the atmosphere are subject to possible chemical




reactions with the reactive intermediates produced by these reactions.  In




particular, it is likely that small fractions of sulfur dioxide and carbon




monoxide, when present, may be oxidized.  In the case of sulfur dioxide,




resulting products are to be found mainly in the aerosol form.  The chemistry




of these reactions has not been elucidated; their consequences would appear




to be minor with the sole exception of the probable effect of the sulfur-




containing products in causing atmospheric turbidity, thereby reducing visibility.
                                     1-24

-------
                                REFERENCES






1.  Hausknecht, R.,  "Air Pollution Effects Reported by California Residents,"




    California State Department of Public Health,  1960.




2.  Middleton, J.  T., Kendrick, J. G.,  Jr., Schwalm,  H.  W.,  Plant Disease




    Reporter, 34,  245, 1950.




3.  Larsen, R. I., Ann. N.  Y.  Acad. Sci., 136,  275, 1966.




4.  Taylor, J. R.,  "Air Quality Report  No. 47," Los Angeles  County Air




    Pollution Control District, 1962.




5.  Yocum, J. E.,  McCaldin, R. 0., "Air Pollution," Stern, A.  C., Ed.,




    Academic Press,  New York,  1968, Vol.  I, 2nd ed.,  Chapter 15.




6.  Goldsmith, J.  R., "Air  Pollution,"  Stern, A. C.,  Ed., Academic Press,




    New York, 1968,  Vol. I, 2nd ed., Chapter 14.




7.  Stephens, E. R.,  "Chemistry of Atmospheric  Oxidants," Presented at  61st




    Annual Meeting of the Air  Pollution Control Association, St.  Paul,




    Minnesota, June,  1968.
                                    1-25

-------
                                  CHAPTER 2




     SOURCES, PRINCIPLES OF CONTROL, AND NATURE OF PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS









                                                                         Page




A.  INTRODUCTION                                                         2-6




B.  NATURAL SOURCES AND BACKGROUND LEVELS OF PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS     2-7




    1.  Hydrocarbons                                                     2-7




    2.  Nitrogen Oxides                                                  2-10




C.  NATIONAL AND REGIONAL EMISSION LEVELS                                2-11




    1.  Hydrocarbons                                                     2-1]




    2.  Nitrogen Oxides                                                  2-13




D.  TECHNOLOGICAL SOURCES OF HYDROCARBONS AND NITROGEN OXIDES            2-17




    1.  Mobile Sources                                                   2~^




        a.  Carbureted Gasoline Engines                                  2-19




        b.  Diesel Engines                                               2-21




        c.  Gas Turbines and Aircraft Jet Engines                        2-24




    2.  Stationary Sources                                               2-25




        a.  Hydrocarbon Emissions "                                       2-25




            1)  Types of Sources                                         2-25




            2)  Emission Factors                                         2-27




        b.  Nitrogen Oxides Emission                                     2-33




            1)  Types of Sources                                         2-33




            2)  Emission Factors                                         2-35
                                     2-1

-------
E.  PRINCIPLES OF HYDROCARBON AND NITROGEN OXIDES CONTROL                2-35




    1.  Hydrocarbons                                                     2-35




        a.  Present Motor Vehicle Controls                               2-37




            1)  Blowby Gases                                             2-37




            2)  Exhaust Gas                                              2-38




            3)  Evaporation                                              2-39




        b.  Proposed Motor Vehicle Controls                              2-40




        c.  Stationary Source Controls                                   2-41




            1)  Evaporation                                              2-41




            2)  Incineration                                             2-42




            3)  Adsorption                                               2-42




            4)  Absorption                                               2-43




            5)  Condensation                                             2-43




            6)  Substitution of Materials                                2-43




    2.  Nitrogen Oxides                                                  2-44



        a.  Proposed Motor Vehicle Controls                              2-44




            1)  Inert Gas Dilution                                       2-45




            2)  Air/Fuel Ratio Adjustment                                2-45



            3)  Combustion Alteration                                    2-45



            4)  Fuel Alteration                                          2-45




            5)  Catalytic Reactors                                       7-'.':,
                                      2-2

-------
                                                                         Page




        b.  Stationary Source Controls                                   2-47




            1)  Reinluft Char Process                                    2-48




            2)  Tyco Modified Lead Chamber Process                       2-48




            3)  Atomics International Molten Carbonate Process           2-48




            4)  Limestone Scrubbing Process                              2-48




F.  NATURE OF PHOTOCHEMICAL RFACTANTS                                    2-48




    1.  Hydrocarbon Classes and Properties                               2-48




        a.  Aliphatic Hydrocarbons                                       2-50




            1)  Alkanes (Paraffins)                                      2-51




                a)  n-Alkanes                                            2-52




                b)  i-Alkanes                                            2-52




            2)  Alkenes (Olefins)                                        2-53




            3)  Alkynes (Acetylenes)                                     2-56




        b.  Aromatic Hydrocarbons                                        2-56




        c.  Alicyclic Hydrocarbons (Naphthenes)                          2-58




    2.  Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air                                      2-61




G.  REACTIVITY OF HYDROCARBONS IN THE PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG COMPLEX         2-66




    1.  Biological Effects                                               2-67



    2.  Chemical Effects                                                 2-69




    3.  Composite Indicators                                             2-70




H.  PROPERTIES OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN                                     2-73



    1.  Nitric Oxide                                                     2-74




    2.  Nitrogen Dioxide                                                 2-74
                                     2-3

-------
                                  CHAPTER 2

                               LIST OF FIGURES



Figure                                                                   Page

 2-1      Percentage Distribution of Hydrocarbons from the               2-20
          Automobile Emission Sources.

 2-2      Eye Irritation Reactivity Vs. Hydrocarbon Structure            2-68
                                      2-4

-------
                                  CHAPTER 2

                                LIST OF TABLES



Table                                                                    Page

2-1       Summary of Nationwide Hydrocarbon Emissions,  1968.              2-12

2-2       Summary of Hydrocarbon Emissions From Metropolitan              2-14
          Areas in the United States, 1967-1968.

2-3       Hydrocarbon Emissions by Source Category for                    2-15
          22 Selected Cities.

2-4       A Summary of Nationwide Nitrogen Oxide Emissions.               2-16

2-5       Nitrogen Oxide Emissions by Source Category for                2-18
          22 Selected Cities.

2-6       Emission Factors for Automobile Exhaust.                       2-22

2-7       Emission Factors for Diesel Engines.                           2-23

2-8       Emission Factors for Aircraft Below 3500 Feet.                  2-25

2-9       Hydrocarbon Emission Factors.                                  2-29

2-10      NO  Emission Factors.                                          2-36

2-11      Properties of Some n-Alkanes.                                  2-53

2-12      Properties of Some Isoalkanes.                                 2-54

2-13      Properties of Some Alkenes (Olefins).                          2-55

2-14      Properties of Some Aromatic Hydrocarbons.                      2-59

2-15      Properties of Some Cycloalkanes.                               2-62

2-16      Some Hydrocarbons Identified in Ambient Air.                    2-63

2-17      Individual Reactivities and Composite Reactivity by            2-71
          Product Yields and Biological Indicators for  Alphatic
          Aldehydes and Hydrocarbons of Various Classes.

2-18      Some Physical Properties of Oxides of Nitrogen.                2-75
                                     2-5

-------
A.  INTRODUCTION




          The environmental appraisal of photochemical air contaminants




constitutes evaluation of (1) the occurrence, behavior, and effects of




hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and their reaction products in the atmosphere




(summarized in the orevious chapter), and (2) the nature, location and relative




importance of their sources.  This chapter provides a basic familiarization




with the sources of photochemical pollution, the chemical and physical




properties of the pollutants, and the principles of control.




          Air pollution can result from numerous processes—natural or




technological.  From the standpoint of environmental appraisal these processes




can be viewed as taking place in two stages.  The first consists of the input




of contaminants to the atmospheric system.  Knowledge of contaminants emitted




and their emission rates is sufficient for the purposes of environmental




appraisal.  The second stage—leading to control implementation plans—is more




difficult.  Here, the numerous factors influencing pollution output that are




subject to control must be determined.  These include the design, performance,




and operation of equipment as well as demographic, behavioral, and economic




factors that determine fuel consumption, production rates, and temporal




emission patterns.  These factors are discussed briefly  in  this  chapter




 and  treated  extensively in the Control Techniques documents for stationary




sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides and in a separate document on the




control of nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide from trcbile




sources, published by tha National Air Pollution Control Administration.
                                      2-6

-------
B.  NATURAL SOURCES AND BACKGROUND LEVELS OF PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS



    1.  Hydrocarbons



          The presence of natural hydrocarbons in the atmosphere, particularly



methane, has been established by measurement only recently.   Although most of



these hydrocarbons arise from biological sources, small and highly localized



quantities of methane and a few other lower molecular weight hydrocarbons are



attributable to geothermal areas, coal fields, natural gas and petroleum fields,



and natural fires.



          Various estimates have been made of the contributions of these natural



sources to hydrocarbons in the atmosphere.  Koyama has estimated the production


                                  8               2
rate of methane to be about 3 x 10  tons per year.   Of this amount the greatest



quantity arises from the decomposition of organic matter at the earth's surface.



Ehhalt,  however, concludes that this is a very conservative estimate, since



methane generated in swampy areas was not included.



          Volatile terpenes and isoprene constitute a separate class of



hydrocarbons for which worldwide natural emission rates have been estimated.



Rasmussen and Went have estimated the rate of production of such compounds to



be about 4.4 x 10  ton per year.   Hazes associated with vegetation in many



areas of the world, such as the blue haze of the Appalachian, have been



ascribed to aerosol formation caused by these substances.



          From these estimates it appears that production of methane from



natural sources is roughly equivalent to that of the higher molecular weight



volatile organics.  There is a great difference, however, in natural background
                                      2-7

-------
levels, implying a related difference in the lifetimes of these materials in



their global cycles.



          There Is substantial agreement on the natural background of methane



in the atmosphere based upon different measurement principles and locations of



such measurements.  Junge indicates that the worldwide range is 0.8 to 1.1 mg/m



(1.2 to 1.5 ppm).   This is seen both in optical measurements such as reported



by Fink, et al.  and Goldberg and Muller,  and In chemical measurements



generally done by gas chromatography.



          From samples taken in nonurban atmospheres, Stephens and Burleson


                                         3

report methane values averaging 0.93 mg/m  (1.39 ppm) over southern California



mountain areas during desert winds, and similar values for Hawaii.  Ethane,


                                                       Q

ethylene and acetylene were found at 0.003 ppm or less.   Cavanagh, et al. found


                                        3                                   3
a mean methane concentration of 1.1 mg/m  (1.6 ppm) with butane at 0.14 mg/m


                                   9
(0.06 ppm) at Point Barrow, Alaska,  while Swinnerton, et al., during an



oceanographic cruise between Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico, reported a mean



methane concentration of 0.83 mg/m   (1.24 ppm).    Furthermore, these latter



authors found that the methane content of ocean water was in equilibrium with



chat found in the atmosphere.



          Lowest hydrocarbon measurements in the urban atmosphere, including



special gas chromatographic measurements by Altshuller, et al.  '   and total



hydrocarbon measurements by flame ionization analyzers such as those provided



by the National Air Surveillance Network, the State of California SCAN
                                     2-8

-------
network, and the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District, are in

the same range as the values reported above for methane in nonurban areas.

          Fewer measurements of other low molecular weight hydrocarbons have

been made as compared to methane in nonurban areas, and no accurate statement
can be given as to ranges of concentrations for these compounds.  Measurements
                                                   9
by Cavanagh, et al. on butane at Pt. Barrow, Alaska  and by Stephens and
                                                                              Q
Burleson in southern California mountain areas on ethane, ethene and acetylene

are 2 or 3 orders of magnitude lower than methane.

          Higher molecular weight hydrocarbon and volatile organic concentra-

tions have been estimated by Rasmussen and Went based upon sensitive gas
                                                       4
chromatographic measurements of alpha- and beta-pinene.   These measurements

average about 0.01 ppm.

          Using his own methane production figures and a total instantaneous

mass of 4.3 x 10   g in the atmosphere, Koyama calculated an atmospheric
                         2
average life of 20 years.   Ehhalt considers this an overestimate and suggests
                                                        3
that an average life of only a few years is more likely.   By comparison with

these estimates for methane, it appears that the lifetime of higher molecular

weight natural hydrocarbons may be in the order of days to months.  The

principal implications relating to the reported information on abundance of

hydrocarbons from natural sources would appear to be in the matter of

atmospheric sampling.  Methane is photochemically nonreactive, and the other

hydrocarbons from natural sources are too low in concentration to be of

concern in urban areas.  The relatively high concentration of methane as
                                      2-9

-------
compared to other hydrocarbons of photochemical significance from man-created



sources, however, makes the use of analytical methods distinguishing methane



of critical importance.



          To summarize, it appears that in nonurban air background levels of



methane are ordinarily in the range of 1 to 1.5 ppm, while other hydrocarbons,



including various terpenes, remain at levels less than 0.1 ppm.



    2.  Nitrogen Oxides



          Of the seven known forms of nitrogen .oxides, only nitric oxide (NO)



and nitrogen dioxide (N0?) are of general significance in air pollution studies.



The major sources of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere are


                                         13
biologic in origin.  Robinson and Robbins   estimate that these sources



contribute approximately 370 x 10  tons annually, while man-made sources



resulting from the fixation of nitrogen and oxygen in high temperature



combustion amounts only to 50 x 10  tons, or about 14 percent of the total.



          Relatively few data are available on nitrogen oxides from nonurban


                                                                    14
areas and these are rather scattered geographically.  Lodge and Pate   found

                                                     o

average values of N02 in Panama ranging from 1.8 ug/m  (0.9 ppb) during the



dry season to 7.1 ug/m  (3.6 ppb) during the rainy periods.  Individual



samples reached 12 wg/m   (6 ppb).  Junge   reported N02 concentrations


                  3                                  3
averaging 1.8 ug/m  (0.9 ppb) in Florida and 2.5 Wg/m  (1.3 ppb) in Hawaii.



          In the Rocky Mountain area of Colorado (Pikes Peak), Hamilton


                                             3

reported an average concentration of 8.0 Hg/m   (4.1 ppb) for NO- and



3.3 ug/m  (2.7 ppb) for NO.  Ripperton, et al.   found an average concentration
                                      2-10

-------
of 9.0 ug/m  (4.6 ppb) N0? in the Appalachian area of North Carolina.   From


                               13
these data Robinson and Robbins   have concluded that continental average


                              3

levels of N0» are about 8 wg/m  (4 ppb) and those over ocean areas about


      3

4 ug/m  (2 ppb).



          Robinson and Robbins   have also prepared a tentative simplified



global nitrogen circulation pattern in which the nitric oxide and nitrogen



dioxide discharged to the atmosphere from whatever the source are primarily



scavenged by hydrolysis with water.  The end products formed are nitrates.



Based upon the estimated global background levels and on the previously cited



annual input rates to the atmosphere, the average residence time for nitrogen



dioxide is about 3 days.



          Several conclusions on background levels and the natural cycle of



nitrogen compounds can be drawn from the above information.  First, the natural



sources of nitrogen oxides have little significance as related to the urban



pollution problem.  Second, the mean residence time of nitrogen dioxide in



the atmosphere, 3 days, is too long to influence photochemical reaction and



transport processes taking place over a few hours.



C.  NATIONAL AND REGIONAL EMISSION LEVELS



    1.  Hydrocarbons



          Based upon Public Health Service estimates, total nationwide



emissions of hydrocarbons and related organic compounds to the atmosphere for

                                               /:                 -i Q

the year 1968 amounted  to approximately 27 x 10  tons.  Table 2-1   shows the



distribution of this total by major source categories, including percent of



relative contribution.  Motor vehicles (47 percent), industrial processes
                                     2-11

-------
Table 2-1.   SUMMARY OF NATIONWIDE HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS,  1968.
                                                              18
                                                   Hydrocarbon Emissions
        Source
1.   Transportation
    a.  Motor Vehicles
        1.  Gasoline
        2.  Diesel
    b.  Aircraft
    c.  Railroads
    d.  Vessels
    e.  Non-highway use
        motor fuels
2.   Fuel Combustion-stationary
    a.  Coal
    b.  Fuel Oil
    c.  Natural Gas
    d.  Wood
3.   Industrial Processes
4.  Solid Waste Disposal
5.  Miscellaneous
    a.  Forest Fires
    b.  Structural Fires
    c.  Coal Refuse
    d.  Organic Solvent Evaporation
    e.  Gasoline Marketing
                                 TOTAL
10
13.







0.




3.
1.
6.




26.
6
tons /year
69
12.55
12.18
0.37
0.34
0.27
0.20
0.33
75
0.19
0.11
Negligible
0.45
76
48
84
2.18
0.10
0.20
3.16
1.20
52
Percent of Total
Emissions
51.6
47.4
46.0
1.4
1.3
1.0
0.7
1.2
2.8
.0.7
0.4
Negligible
1.7
14.2
5.6
25.8
8.2
0.4
0.8
11.9
4.5
100.0
                                   2-12

-------
(14 percent), and solvent usage (12 percent) constitute the most significant
                                                        19
sources by far.  According to Mason, Ozolins and Morita,   who reported
similar information for the year 1966, approximately 63 percent of the total
hydrocarbon emissions arises from urban areas.
          Hydrocarbon emission estimates have been made for 22 major
                                        19
metropolitan areas in the United States.    Although information is still
quite fragmentary, emissions by area range from 50,000 to 1.3 million tons
per year.  Table 2-2 shows this information for each of the available areas,
including rates per capita and per unit area.
          Perhaps of more importance are the data in Table 2-3, which provide
estimates of the average and the range of contributions by source category in
                                                                 19
the 22 metropolitan areas included in the study referenced above.    The most
significant finding was that while transportation sources accounted for a
higher proportion of total hydrocarbon losses in these metropolitan areas than
in the nation as a whole, the range was extremely wide:  37 to 99 percent.
    2.  Nitrogen Oxides
          Recent estimates of total national emission levels of nitrogen oxides
                                       s                      ?0
have changed from approximately 14 x 10  tons per year in 1966   to over
       r                       1 ft
18 x 10  tons per year In 1968.    Table 2-4 shows the distribution of the
latter total by major source categories.  Relative percent contributions are
also included.  Over 90 percent of the total emissions result from the
fixation of nitrogen in combustion processes and less than 2 percent from
industrial processes.  As with hydrocarbons, transportation at 47 percent
                                     2-13

-------
Table 2-2.  SUMMARY OP HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS FROM METROPOLITAN
            AREAS* IN THE UNITED STATES, 1967-196819.
                                                   Emissions
POPULATION
880,000
2,520,000
2,410,000
2,700,000
1,660,000
2,010,000
5,500,000
750,000
2,700,000
7,100,000
1,300,000
840,000
4,500,000
1,050,000
2,290,000
1,730,000
1,230,000
4,090,000
1,200,000
2,000,000
AREA.
mi. ^
2310
3050
4500
1280
2620
15000
4590
1120
2270
41000
1470
1390
7000
3080
2650
2630
3200
2680
1000
7800
10 Tons/yr.
64
95
330
87
55
170
470
64
310
1270
130
46
790
74
120
83
• 230
480
54
292
Tons /MI2 /yr T
28
31
73
68
21
11
102
57
137
31
88
33
112
24
45
32
72
179
5
-------
                                                                           19
Table  2-3.  HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS BY SOURCE CATEGORY FOR 22 SELECTED CITIES.



                                                                 Emissions

       Source Category                                         (Percent of Total)



  I.  Transportation


     Average                                                        70.2


     Range                                                          37-99


     A.  Motor Vehicles


         Average                                                    66.9


     B.  Other


         Average                                                     3.3


 II.  Fuel Combustion


     Average                                                         2.8


     Range                                                           0-18


     A.  Power Plants


         Average                                                     0.1


     B.  Industrial


         Average                                                     2.2


     C.  Domestic


         Average                                                     0.5


III.  Process  Losses


     Average                                                         19.9


     Range                                                           1-63


 IV.  Refuse Disposal


     Average                                                          7.1



     Range                                                          0.4-26



                                     2-15

-------
          Table 2-4.  A SUMMARY OF NATIONWIDE NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS?"8
                                     NOX Emissions

          Source Category              (106 tons/yr)      Percent of Total Emissions


   I.   Transportation                   8.71                     47.2

        A.    Motor Vehicles                    7.59                     41.1

             1.   Gasoline                          6.99                     37.9

             2.   Diesel                            0.60                       3.2

        S'    Aircraft                          0.04                     0.2

        C.    Railroads                         0.43                     2.3

        D.    vessels                           0.29                     1.6

        E.    Nonhighway use  of  motor  fuel      0.36                     1.9




  II.    Fuel  Combustion

        in  Stationary Sources            7.45                     40.4

        A.    Coal*                             3.85                     20.9

        B.    Fuel Oil *+                       1.55                       8.4

        C.    Natural Gas                       1.80                       9.8

        D.    Wood                              0.25                       1.3




III.     Solid Waste Disposal            0.68                     3.7




  IV.    Industrial Processes            0.20                     1.1




   V.    Miscellaneous                    1.40                     7.6




        Total                           18.44                    100.0
   * For 1967
   •f Includes kerosene and LPG
                                         2-16

-------
constitutes the largest single source of nitrogen oxides.  Fuel combustion in




stationary sources at 40 percent is next in importance, with approximately




half of that amount originating from fossil-fueled electric-generating plants.



                                         19
          The 1966 study by Mason, et al.   on sources of emissions in 28 major




metropolitan areas shows that a relatively wide range exists in percent of




contribution by source.  Data on nitrogen oxides available from 22 cities only




are summarized in Table 2-5.




D.  TECHNOLOGICAL SOURCES OF HYDROCARBONS AND NITROGEN OXIDES




          Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides, along with carbon monoxide, have



in common the automobile engine as a major source of community air pollution.




At this point the similarity ends.  Hydrocarbons originate primarily from the




inefficient combustion of fuels—especially the more volatile ones, such as




gasoline—with the remaining major sources including industrial process losses,




solvent evaporation, and the storage, transport, and distribution of gasoline.




          The great majority of nitrogen oxides emissions, on the other hand,




originates from the reaction of nitrogen and oxygen in air in high temperature




combustion processes.  Relatively small quantities, nationally, are emitted




from industrial processes, although in localized cases these may make a significant



contribution.



          Because of the differing control strategies required in terms of



engineering, economic, and legal considerations, sources of hydrocarbons and



nitrogen oxides are conveniently treated in terms of moving and stationary



sources.  Moving sources include gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles,
                                      2-17

-------
Table 2-5.  NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS BY SOURCE CATEGORY FOR 22 SELECTED CITIES.
                                                                              19
      Source Category

  I.  Trans por t a tIon

      Average

      Range

      A.  Motor Vehicles

          Average

      B.  Other

          Average

 II.  Fuel Combustion in Stationary Sources

      Average

      Range

      A.  Power Plants

          Average

      B.  Industrial

          Average

      C.  Domestic

          Average

 III.  Process Losses

      Average

      Range

 IV.  Refuse Disposal

      Average

      Range

                                      2-18
    Emissions
(Percent of Total)
      42.6

      23-74




      36.3




       6.3



      50.7

      10-79




      23.0




      23.8



       3.9



       5.2

       1-21




       1.5

     0.1-1.0

-------
railroads, and aircraft.  Due to the interrelated nature of the problems,
hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen from these sources are considered jointly.
Principal stationary sources of hydrocarbons include petroleum and petrochemical
operations, solvent usage, and waste-burning.  Major stationary sources of
nitrogen oxides include large fossil-fueled power plants, industrial and
commercial process heating, industrial furnaces, incineration, and domestic
heating.
    1.  Mobile Sources
        a.  Carbureted Gasoline Engines
          Carbureted gasoline internal combustion engines (i.e., conventional
automobile engines) emit air pollutants from four sources (see Figure 2-1):
1) engine exhaust, 2) crankcase blowby, 3) carburetor, and 4) fuel tank.
                                                                 21
According to a survey conducted on a large number of automobiles,   100 percent
of the carbon monoxide, 100 percent of the nitric oxide, and about 65 percent
of the unburned hydrocarbons come from the engine exhaust; another 25 percent
of unburned hydrocarbons escapes from crankcase blowby, with an additional
5 percent each resulting from evaporation of gasoline from the carburetor and
from the fuel tank.
          The quantity and reactivity (or photochemical potential) of the
unburned hydrocarbons as well as the quantity of nitric oxide and carbon
monoxide emitted from the automobile exhaust depend on the engine operating
                                                  22
mode (idle, acceleration, cruising, deceleration),   engine parameters
                                                         2*i
(compression ratio, spark advance, air-fuel ratio, etc.),   and fuel
            24
composition.
                                      2-19

-------
       SfcHC
     CAasURETO*
      EMISSIONS
    S*HC
GASOLINE TANK
   EMISSIONS
                                                         EXHAUST EMISSIONS:
CRANKCASg
EMISSIONS
                                                            45% KC
     Figure  2-1.  PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF HYDROCARBONS FROM THE  FOUR
                 AUTOMOBILE EMISSION SOURCES.
                                     2-20

-------
          The concentration of the three major air pollutants in the exhaust


of automobiles not equipped with exhaust emission control systems as reported


in 1966 ranges as follows:


            1.  Total unburned hydrocarbons:  200 ppm to over 1000 ppm.


            2.  Carbon monoxide:  0.8 percent to over 4.0 percent.


            3.  Nitric oxide:  750 ppm to over 3000 ppm.

                                                            25
These data are based on a surveillance emission test program   performed


according to California Standard Test Procedures,   7-Mode Test Cycle, "Hot


Start."  For "Cold Start" the above values (except for nitric oxide) would be


about 40 percent higher.


        b.  Diesel Engines


          The emission from dlesel exhaust differs from that of carbureted


gasoline engines mainly because dleeel fuel components are far less volatile


than gasoline.  Furthermore, carbureted gasoline engines, in general, operate


with a deficiency of combustion air, whereas the diesel engine normally


operates with a substantial excess of combustion air and a substantially higher


compression ratio.  Table 2-6 shows the emission factors for exhaust of


carbureted gasoline engines, and Table 2-7 presents diesel engine emission

        27
factors.    Emission of carbon monoxide from diesel exhaust is negligible


and emission of unburned hydrocarbons substantially lower than from gasoline


engines.  However, emission of nitrogen oxides and other contaminants is higher,


Higher emission of aldehydes (and formaldehydes) is partially responsible for
                                      2-21

-------
Table 2-6.  EMISSION FACTORS FOR AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST.
Type of Emission
Aldehydes (as HCHO)
Carbon monoxide
Hydrocarbons (as C)
Oxides of nitrogen (as N0»)
Oxides of sulfur (as SO.)
Organic acids (as CH3C02H)
Particulates
Emissions
Pounds Per 1000
Vehicle-Miles
0.3
165.0
12.5
8.5
0.6
0.3
0.8
Pounds Per 1000
Gallons of Gas
4
2300
200
113
9
4
12
                       2-22

-------
            Table 2-7.  EMISSION FACTORS FOR DIESEL ENGINES.
                (pounds per 1000 gallons of dieael fuel)
          Type of Emission
Emission Factor
Aldehydes  (as HCHO)

Carbon monoxide

Hydrocarbons (as C)

Oxides of nitrogen  (as NO,

Oxides of sulfur (as S02)

Organic acids (as CH.COjH)

Particulate
       10

       60

      136

      222

       40

       31

      110
                                   2-23

-------
                                 28
the distinct diesel exhaust odor.    Emission of participates is higher by an


                                                                  29
order of magnitude, resulting in the visible diesel exhaust amoke.



          Air pollution from crankcase blowby is negligible with diesel


                                                                             28
engines, since the diesel compresses only air instead of an air-fuel mixture.



There is practically no air pollution resulting from fuel evaporation from the



fuel system, because diesel fuel has a very low volatility index.



        c.  Gas Turbines and Aircraft Jet Engines



          The combustion process in gas turbines and aircraft jet engines



differs from that of gasoline and diesel engines mainly in that it occurs at



constant pressure (continuous process), low compression ratio, and with a very



large excess of combustion air.  In general, the exhaust emission is very low



in carbon monoxide and in unburned hydrocarbons.  Nitrogen oxides omission Is



comparable to that from gasoline engines, and emission of particulates is



even higher than that from diesel engines.  The first and last columns in



Table 2-8 compare the emission factors of aircraft equipped with four jet



engines and of aircraft equipped with four carbureted gasoline (piston)



engines.



          Emission factors are presented on the basis of pounds per flight,



where a flight is a combination of a landing and a takeoff (Including taxi,



takeoff, climbout, approach, and landing) that occurs below the arbitrarily



chosen altitude or 3,500 feet.  The main source of pollution from gas turbines



and aircraft jet engines is the exhaust; pollution resulting from evaporation



from the fuel tank is minimal, because fuels with low volatility are generally



used.
                                      2-24

-------
    00
     0>
     ex
     C
     3
     O
     (X
00
 I
C-J

Ol
tH 4J
00 UH
d  o







C
O
to
to
•H
j3
w

U-4
O

U)
0)
a
>i
H



I 0)
v* e
3 *r4
O 00
pt4 0


C/
1 C
6 *rl
3 00
H d
01
1 01
^ c*
DM t
^1
0 00

01


01
O,-t
*r^
E~4 £3
0)
4-1
01
•n
1
d
id


^
a
o
•H
4-1
d
01
d
0
u
























10 o o -* -»
O vO O tT) rH
CM vO rH
CO



CM O O CO NO
• • • * •
O -» m \o o
CO CM
rH

rH O CM O lO
rH C7\ rH IO CS





CO O CO rH vO
O CM O rH O



, C o to o
JC O O 0) -H
01 J3 M T3 4J
-O M T3 iH M
rH « X XI «
•< o a 6 P*








•
HH
UH
O
0)
^*^
4-1
«d
•o
d
(0
$
•a
d
R)
rH
n)

^4H
O

d
0
4-1
d
*rH
•a
o
o
td

0)
td

•o
0)
d
•H
14-4
Ol
T3

to
•H

4J
J3
00
•rl
rH
UH

<^
fl































U-l
UH
O
01
rt
4-1

d
o

d
0
tH
4-1
O
0)

d
•H

H
Ol

id


o
55
J3
O.
•H
4-1
rH
A
4-1
UH
ctt
O
•H
*
Ol
d
•rl
VJ*
r
§

h
o
UH
• M
10
r--
•
O
43
td

rt
T3
Ol
to
01
f.
4J

i^J
P.
•H
4-1
1

^|
U-4
td
u

^4
•H
« •
IO
Ol •
d o
•H
00 ?s
d &
01
1 CO
01 4J
Ol 0)
M "d
JC
4J 01
w
M 01
O X
ry . ^J
o
                                                 2-25

-------
    2.  Stationary Sources




        *•  Hydrocarbon Emissions



          The major stationary sources of hydrocarbons in the United States



are the production, processing, storage,  and transfer of petroleum products



(principally gasoline) and organic solvent losses.   Relatively smaller quantities



arise from the combustion of fuels and refuse.  A brief review of some of these



sources and pertinent emission factors follows.



            1)  Types of Sources



          Potential sources of hydrocarbon emissions In petroleum production



and processing include:  leakage in the oil field or refining, gasoline storage



tanks, gasoline loading facilities, air blowing of asphalt, blow-down systems,



catalyst regenerators, processing vessels, flares, compressors, pumps, vacuum



jets, waste effluent handling equipment,  turnaround operations.



          Gasoline distribution and marketing systems emit hydrocarbon vapors




from tank truck loading racks, service station tank-filling operations and



automobile tank-filling operations.



          Organic solvents are derived mainly but not exclusively from



petroleum.  They are used in many kinds of operationa.  Chemical, drug and



pharmaceutical manufacturing plants can be sources of organic emissions from



chose operations involving the use of organic solvents.  Rubber and plastic



product manufacturing often involves the use of organic solvent-based adhesives



and other solvent uses which lead to organic emissions.  Paint and varnishes,



lacquers, undercoatings, etc., are composed of 40 to 80 percent organic solvents



which evaporate during or after application.  Degreasing of manufactured metal
                                      2-26

-------
items can cause significant organic emissions.   Vapor phase degreasing with




trichlorethylene (not a hydrocarbon) is the most widely used method, but




spray degreasing with other solvents is also used.   Dr/cleaning of clothing




utilizes organic solvents and contributes to emissions.  The processes by




which solvents and solvent-containing materials (e.g., paints, lacquers, etc.)




are manufactured are also potential sources.




          Metallurgical coke plants emit varying amounts of hydrocarbons




depending on type of furnace, operating methods, maintenance practices and




other factors.




          Fuel-burning equipment of all types can emit organics when improperly




adjusted, inadequately maintained or incorrectly operated.




          Waste disposal by burning can cause hydrocarbon emissions from




incomplete combustion.  Open burning of refuse is the greatest offense in this




category.  Inefficient incinerators may also be sources.  Carbonaceous material




from many sources is disposed of by burning.




          Miscellaneous sources of organic gases from biological sources




include fermentation industries, food processing, organic fertilizer processing,




wood distillation and soap manufacturing.




            2)  Emission Factors




          For individual emission sources by source type, an adequate emission




inventory will define the nature, magnitude, duration, and frequency of




emissions.  For a regional emission inventory, detailed analysis of all sources




would be desirable.  It is often necessary, however, to estimate emissions
                                      2-27

-------
from sources for which detailed data are unavailable.  Estimates are derived



by the use of emission factors based on sampling data, material balances, and



engineering appraisals of sources similar to those in question.



          Table 2-9 is a compilation of available emission factors for sources



of organic compounds (including hydrocarbons) operated without control



equipment, except where noted.  Emission factors were compiled from a recent



U.S. Public Health Service Publication.27



          Data on emission factors for the process industries do not include



values for surface coating or degreasing operations.  The solvents and thinners



used In these operations all evaporate to the atmosphere unless controlled.  A



somewhat similar situation exists in the case of paint varnish and resins



manufacturing.  Remember that the emission factors listed are average values



and can vary depending upon operating conditions as well as upon specific



equipment factors.  There are, of course, many process sources of hydrocarbon



emissions other than those listed in Table 2-9.



          Examples of the use of emission factors are given below:



            I.  Coal combustion



                Given:  Power plant burns 100,000 tons per year of coal



                (100,000 tons/year) (0.2   lb °f Hc  ) „ 20,000 Ib of HC/year
                                         ton or coal


           II-  Gasoline-powered vehicle



                Given;  1960 uncontrolled automobile using 1,000 gallons a



                        year of gasoline



                Exhaust emissions:  (1000 fiy~~£)  (208 1QOQ-gal ) of HC/year
                                      2-28

-------
            Table 2-9.   HYDROCARBON EMISSION FACTORS.
        Source
                           Lb.  of Hydrocarbons
                           and/or Organics Per
                               Unit Given
                                                      Unit
FUEL COMBUSTION - STATIONARY SOURCES (AS METHANE)
Coal
    10 x 10  BTU/hr capacity
    10 to 100 x 106 BTU/hr
        capacity
    Greater than 100 x 106 BTU/hr
        capacity
Fuel Oil
    10 x 10  BTU/hr capacity
    10 to 100 x 106 BTU/hr
        capacity
    Greater than 100 x 10  BTU/hr
        capacity
                                    10

                                     1

                                     0.205

                                     5
                                     4

                                     3.8
                                   Negligible
                                              ton of coal burned

                                              ton of coal burned

                                              ton of coal burned

                                              1,000 gallons of oil burned
                                              1,000 gallons of oil burned

                                              1,000 gallons of oil burned
Natural Gas
Wood30
FUEL COMBUSTION - MOBILE SOURCES
Gasoline-powered motor vehicle (as carbon)
    Exhausta>b   '                208-404
                           or 13.1 - 25.4
    Crankcase
               32
    Evaporative (carburetor
        and fuel tank)d
Diesel-powered vehicle 27,32
    (as carbon)
                                    128

                                     92

                                 177-221
                                              1,000 gallons of gas burned
                                              1,000 vehicle miles
                                              1,000 gallons of gas burned

                                              1,000 gallons of gas throughput

                                              1,000 gallons of diesel fuel
a Based on an average route speed of 25 miles per hour.  Emission factors
  for various speeds can be found in Reference 27.
  1968 exhaust control devices were expected to reduce exhaust hydrocarbons
  by 70 percent and 1970 devices should reduce exhaust hydrocarbons by
  80 percent.
C 1963 blowby devices reduced crackcase hydrocarbon emissions approximately
  80 percent while 1968 devices were expected to control these emissions
  100 percent.
  Anticipated control of 90 percent by 1971.
                                     2-29

-------
     Source

Aircraft (as methane)
;    Jet   (conventional)
        4 engine
        3 engine
        2 engine
        1 engine
    Jet31 (fan-type)
        4 engine
        3 engine
        2 engine
        1 engine
              31
    Turbo-prop
        4 engine
        2 engine
    Piston
        4 engine
        2 engine
 Table 2-9 (cont'd)
Lb. of Hydrocarbons
and/or Organica Per
    Unit Givaa
         7.24
         5.43
         3.62
         1.81

        31.2
        23.4
        15.6
         7.8

         2.47
         1.24

        60.5
        25.2
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
    Open burning on-site of leaves,
        brush, paper, etc.27>30    12-415
                                     80
                                   1.2-3.1

                                     3.7

                                   4.8-114
                                    30-67
                                   14.5-119
     Open burning
                          07  on
     Municipal incinerator"3"
     Multiple chamber
           incinerator
     Single chamber
           incincerator *'••"
     Flue fed incinerator27'32
                         27 32
     Domestic incinerator* >J
                                                  Unit
                                                 Flight"
                                                 Plight
                                                 Flight
                                                 Flight

                                                 Flight
                                                 Flight
                                                 Plight
                                                 Flight

                                                 Flight
                                                 Plight

                                                 Flight
                                                 Flight
                         ton of waste burned
                         ton of waste burned
                         ton of waste burned

                         ton of waste burned

                         ton of waste burned
                         ton of waste burned
                         ton of waste burned
  Flight  is defined as a combination of landing and take-off.
                                     2-30

-------
                                 Table  2-9  (cont'd)
              Source
Lb. of Hydrocarbons
and/or Organics Per
     Unit Given
                                                           Unit
Petroleum refinery (as
     total hydrocarbons)
     Boilers and process heaters   165
     Fluid catalytic unit          239
     Moving-bed catalytic
          cracking unit             99
     Compressor internal com-
          bustion engines          1.31
     Slowdown system
          with control             5
          without control          300
     Process drains
          with control             8
          without control          210
     Vacuum jets
          with control

          without control

     Cooling towers
  Negligible
      130
1,000 bbl. oil burned
1,000 bbl. fresh feed

1,000 bbl. fresh feed

         3
1,000 ft.  .of fuel gas burned

1,000 bbl. refinery capacity
1,000 bbl. refinery capacity

1,000 bbl. waste water
1,000 bbl. waste water

1,000 bbl. vacuum distillation
     capacity
1,000 bbl. vacuum distillation
     capacity
10  gallon cooling water capaci
                                        2-31

-------
                         Table 2-9 (Cont'd)
     Source
Lb. of Hydrocarbons
and/or Organics Per
     Unit Given
Pipeline valves and flanges   28
Vessel relief valves          11
Pump seals                    17
Compressor seals              5
Air blowing, blend changing,
     and sampling             10
Storage  •
     V.P.>1.5 psia-fixed roof 47
     V.P.>1.5 psia-floating
          roof                4.8
     V.P.<1.5 psia-fixed roof 1.6
     Unit


1,000 bbl. refinery capacity

1,000 bbl. refinery capacity

1,000 bbl. refinery capacity
1,000 bbl. refinery capacity


1,000 bbl. refinery capacity
         •
1,000 bbl. storage capacity

1,000 bbl. storage capacity
1,000 bbl. storage capacity
Dry cleaning
     Chlor-hydrocarbons       1.7
     Hydrocarbon vapors       2.2
Gasoline handling  (evaporation)
     Filling tank  vehicles
          •Splash fill         8.2
           Submerge fill       4.9
     Filling service station  tanks
           Splash fill-        11.5
           Submerge fill       7.3
     Filling automobile  tanks 11.6
                          capita-year
                          capita-year
                          1,000  gallons  throughput
                          1,000  gallons  throughput

                          1,000  gallons  throughput
                          1,000  gallons  throughput
                          1,000  gallons  throughput
                                   2-32

-------
                Crankcase emissions:  (1000 sa^°ns) (128



                                      128 Ib of HC/year




                Evaporative losses:   (1000 «iiS!») (92 100*bgal.) -



                                      92 Ib of HC/year




                Total Automobile Emissions = 428 	
                                                  year




        b.  Nitrogen Oxides Emissions




            1)  Types of Sources




          As previously, stated, the major source of nitrogen oxides results




from the high temperature reaction between nitrogen and oxygen in air used




for combustion with various fuels.  On a nationwide basis, the quantities of




NO  produced in this manner are estimated to be as high as 98 percent of the




total technological nitrogen oxides emissions.




          Thus the production of NO  can be viewed as a by-product or side




reaction proceeding initially as follows:





            N2 + °2   "   2N°


The nitric oxide (NO) formed may be further oxidized to nitrogen dioxide (NO ),




although more than 90 percent of the nitrogen oxides formed in combustion




operations are in the form of nitric oxide.  Other sections of this report




deal with the various atmospheric reactions which may take place subsequent




to Discharge.



          Many factors influence the actual amount of nitrogen oxides




formation, including flame temperature, fuel-to-air ratio, mixing, residence



time, and pressure.  In general very large, efficient, high temperature
                                     2-33

-------
combustion units such as those used to produce stem for electric power



generation produce the highest concentrations of nitrogen oxides.  Much smaller



quantities, proportionately, are produced by small units such as household



writer heaters.



          A wide variety of combustion operations are found in almost every



facet of our business and everyday life.  The largest single category here



would be the fossil-fueled (coal, oil, and gas) steam electric-generating




plants.  Other significant categories include commercial and domestic space



heaters, stationary engines, process heaters, and incinerators.



          A slightly different category of combustion operation includes



industrial furnaces and ovens.  These are used, for smelting metal ores,



refining metal, manufacturing cement and glass, producing refractlves,



processing other minerals, and baking and drying protective and decorative



surface coatings.




          Nitrogen oxide emissions from noncombustion industrial processes



are almost entirely limited to the manufacturing and use of nitric acid.  The



principal uses of nitric acid are ammonium nitrate production, oxidation of



organic intermediates, nitration processes such as explosives production*



acidulation of phosphate rock for fertilizer production, and metal surface



creating.  The nitrogen oxides emitted from these processes result principally



from the reduction or decomposition of nitric acid.  Both nitrogen dioxide and



nitric oxide are found.  Even though total quantities may be email, high



concentrations of nitrogen oxides may be produced in certain of  these




processes.
                                      2-34

-------
            2)  Emission Factors



          The development of emission factors for nitrogen oxides has been a



complex and difficult problem.  For combustion sources alone a whole set of



interacting factors such as equipment size, burner type, cooling surface area,



firing rate, type of fuel, and air/fuel ratio are involved.  While predictive



formulae and nomograms have been developed for nitrogen oxides emissions from


                                33
a variety of combustion sources,   a wide range of values has been obtained



from seemingly similar sources.



          Similar problems exist in the development of factors for noncombustion



sources.  Most such processes utilize some built-in control equipment for



economic reasons alone, making a simple distinction between uncontrolled and



controlled factors nearly impossible.  Many other variables such as raw



material composition and production rate also have a significant influence on



the emission factors for any given situation.  Nevertheless, Table 2-10


                                                           27
presents estimates of emission factors for nitrogen oxides.



E.  PRINCIPLES OF HYDROCARBON AND NITROGEN OXIDES CONTROL



    1.   Hydrocarbons



          The control of hydrocarbon vapors from technological sources rests



upon several basic principles.  These include (1) restriction of evaporative



loss, (2) recovery by mass transfer principles, (3) optimization of



combustion processes, and (4) substitution of process materials and fuels for



those having altered chemical or physical properties.
                                      2-35

-------
j 1
Q
O
w
«
t.»
V*
8
«
(3
«
tj
H


(3
O
•H
U
(Q
I-l
«
S
U
o
•r*
>J
U
O
*
. *-*
I*- Id
CM ,_,
—• »-\ *"?
1 J rJ
> G *
0 « 0 0
*J JC O rH O rH
J3 00 O •»-. O ~^
00 -r* O M O W
.r4 rH rH C5 rH C
rH CVi -^ O *^ O
O, -«sl (A *J M «
-i Jo ,0 ja
jQ rH rH  o ^ r; ™
CM rH 0 rH O CM
in v-» CM SX r-4 ^^ O»
O
10 ^
Pi
8 «
u j
•*&
n.

;?*
O X
rH k-1
VI *->
\r* w
S 1
*•"*
«
Q
2



~ G" S
yx w JJ *
en ~< "» S
u CM o «a o 3
*< ° s . , °° c s
o " ° ' 5 S 1 *
2 S § -5 o g £
-^ O " G rH 4J JJ
-Q U «>. O **• °
rH JO 3 -5 PJ «
f» rH rH rH U
^ «S
^ "** ** o g
§ § s s
VO rH 01 • ^
2 ^ a Z ' ' ^2
- s s s ^
^ ^ ^ ° ^ SC3
5 S -*  rH >-» M

V
U
d
rH rH
rH 01
T4 3
tJ (H
at
•rl rH
W Q .»
J S. --S
rH 6) <1) -H
,< Dt C G (0
_ 3 T< 4> 41
2 ti rH <0 «
S? rH O O
2 TO *J S U XI rH
TO 0 « » .
r4
Indus C










Household and
Commercial








c
r-J
QJ
3
rVl








cn CM o
r«. >* oo
en co vo















m CM 0
o  r7
u S ^
>M 3 ec
o w



















,
11
H
-H
rH
<0
-H
U
"

S
§
3

«
00
to
U
01
<0
I-
o
H-l
S
-*
QQ
*-<
e
3
o<
N
-*4
V)
\
3 a — 4 ^
O "**w -
tf) ---. 3 JH
IT EJ H «
U H M
« rH»D
rH r-~ -r4 v£>

3
O
^

V4
O
>M
^
' 2-36 k

-------
          The applications of these principles depend upon whether the emissions




arise from product storage and transfer, industrial processes, or combustion.




Vehicular sources involve a complex mix of both evaporative and combustion




losses.




        a-  Present Motor Vehicle Controls




            1)  Blowby Gases




          During the compression, power and exhaust strokes of a 4-cycle




Internal combustion gasoline engine, gases present in the cylinder space above




the piston are at pressures above that of the atmosphere.  Because the piston




rings do not constitute a perfect seal, a portion of the gas mixture is forced




by the rings into the crankcase during each of the above-mentioned conditions.




These so-called "blowby" gases contain varying amounts of unburned or partially




burned hydrocarbons.  Of the total hydrocarbon emissions from uncontrolled




vehicles, approximately 20 percent originate from blowby.




          Essentially  100 percent control of blowby hydrocarbon  is achieved by




closing  the  normal  crankcase vents  and  returning the gases  through appropriate




piping to the  intake manifold.   In  essence,  these gases  are recycled through  the




combustion process.  To avoid rough idling, flow is regulated by a spring-loaded




valve in the return line.




          The successful application of this technique has required the use of




higher detergent gasolines and lubricating oils to minimize carburetor deposits




and .sludge formation in oil.
                                      2-37

-------
            2)  Exhaust Gas




          The reduction of hydrocarbons In exhaust gases is accomplished by one




of two general approaches in systems presently in use.




          The first principle involves the injection of controlled amounts of




additional combustion air at the cylinder exhaust ports.  This further oxidizes




the unburned or partially burned hydrocarbons in the oxygen-deficient exhaust




gases.  The introduction of this additional air requires an auxiliary




compressor.  With the increasing use of the engine modification approach to




control, the application of the air injection technique has become




concentrated in automobiles having manual transmissions.




          The second and most widely used approach to exhaust gas hydrocarbon




control is preventive in nature.  It involves a series of integrated engine




and engine-accessory modifications designed to improve overall combustion




efficiency (not to be confused with energy-utilization efficiency).  Major




elements involved in the engine modification approach include:




            1.  Leaner air-to-fuel ratios.




            2.  Improved air-fuel mixing.




            3.  More uniform air-fuel mixture distribution.




            4.  More precise fuel metering.




            5.  Improved cylinder combustion conditions.




          Attainment of these design objectives has been accomplished by a




number of measures, not all of which are used in any one system.  Measures




which have been used include leaner idle and cruise fuel-metering settings,
                                      2-38

-------
combustion-air temperature control, dual intake manifolds, fuel injectiou,



spark retardation combined with more open throttle during idle, and combust,,ou



chamber redesign to minimize extent of quench zones (areas where premature



combustion termination occurs).



            3)  Evaporation



          Approximately 10 percent of the total hydrocarbon emission from an



uncontrolled automobile is from evaporation of fuel from the fuel tank and


           21
carburetor.    Most fuel tank losses occur during filling, when air saturated



with gasoline vapor is displaced by the liquid gasoline; however, losses aiso



result from heat expansion of the air space over the fuel during the normal



daytime heating cycle.  As the vapor pressure of gasoline rises with increased



temperatures, this type of evaporative loss is accentuated on v^ry warm ('ays



following cool nights.



          Carburetor losses occur following engine shutdown, when the mure



volatile fraction of the fuel in the carburetor evaporates.  This is termed



the "hot soak" loss, as a substantial amount of heat is transferred from the



hot engine to the carburetor body during this period.



          Evaporation controls,  effective in California for 1970 automobiles



and in 1971 nationally, consist of a means for conducting the fuel vapor.4 to



ell her the crankcase or an activated charcoal canister.  In the first C.TSL- the



vapors are merely held in the air space, while the charcoal actually absorbs



them.  The gasoline thus collected is eventually returned to the induction



system for burning in the engine at a time when engine performance will not bi-



affected.
                                      2-39

-------
        b.  Proposed Motor Vehicle Controls




          More restrictive motor vehicle emission controls for hydrocarbons




will require the application of control techniques beyond those now in use.




First steps might include direct and catalytic exhaust manifold reactors,




more drastic engine modification, and fuel alteration.  The latter approach




envisions reduction in volatility and substitution of leas reactive




hydrocarbons for certain of the components (principally olefins) now commonly




present.  This type of hydrocarbon control is most effective on evaporative




losses and becomes less meaningful where mechanical evaporative controls are




used.




          Beyond the hydrocarbon control now thought possible with the present




4-cycle, spark-ignited, gasoline-fueled, internal combustion engine, other




types of motive power have been advanced and publicized.  These have sometimes




been described as "low emission" systems and include the gas turbine, electric




drive, the steam engine, the Stirling engine, and the stratified charge engine.




Other suggestions involve the complete substitution of liquified petroleum




gases—or, as a special case, liquefied natural gas—-for gasoline as a fuel.




          Proposals for reduction of hydrocarbon emissions from vehicular



sources extend to areas other than the use of specific vehicular emission




standards.  These include:



            1.  Substitution, in part, of public transportation for private




                motor vehicles.
                                      2-40

-------
            2.  Improved road design and traffic control systems so as to




                reduce high-emission, stop-and-go driving.




            3.  Restriction by regulation or by economic incentive of the




                use of private vehicles.




These areas fall within the jurisdiction of the individual states, and will




require major evaluation efforts.




        c .  Stationary Source Controls




          Control principles used for stationary sources of hydrocarbons and




related organic substances include (1) evaporation prevention (including vapor




recovery), (2) incineration, (3) adsorption, (4) absorption, (5) condensation,




auJ (6) substitution of less volatile and less photochemically reactive




materials in solvents for cleaning and surface coating use.  A brief




description follows of the principles involved for each.




            1)  Evaporation




          As a general principle, the direct control of hydrocarbon




evaporation involves the minimization of liquid-air contact.  Major




opportunities for such control are in the storage and transfer of materials,




e.g., gasoline.  One approach involves the substitution of floating roofs for




fixed roofs in storage tanks.  This eliminates the air space between the




surface of the liquid and the tank roof, thus reducing the loss of vapors




during tank fueling operations and during the daily contraction and expansion




of air resulting from day and night temperature differences.
                                      2-41

-------
          Vapor recovery systems physically move excess vapors to a control




unit such as a compressor-condenser system.  They are normally used only with




hydrocarbons of rather high vapor pressure.




            2)  Incineration




          Incineration acts by combustion of hydrocarbon or other organic




emissions.  Product recovery is thus eliminated, but by-product heat may




sometimes be utilized.  Incineration is only used where the products of




combustion are innocuous.




          A successful combustion control process requires adequate heat




impact, good mixing and sufficient residence time to result in complete




combustion.  Less than optimum conditions may result in partial oxidation




only.




            3)  Adsorption




          Adsorption is a physical process whereby gas molecules are attracted




to and held on solid surfaces.  Certain solids such as activated alumina,




silica gel, and activated carbon have these properties to the extent that they




have practical applications.  Further, these materials are prepared so that




they have a very large surface-to-volume ratio.




          Adsorbents are generally selective in their properties, the most




distinguishing feature being their relative polarity.  Polar adsorbents




preferentially adsorb water, while nonpolar solvents select organic




substances.  For this reason activated carbon, a nonpolar adsorbent, is most




commonly used for control of organic emissions.
                                      2-42

-------
            4)  Absorption




          Absorption is the process by which gases or vapors are collected in




a relatively nonvolatile liquid absorbent.  To be effective, the absorbent




should have the capability of holding relatively large quantities of the




solute gas at normal temperatures.




          Absorbents tend to have the greatest holding capacities for related




classes of materials.  Thus organic absorbing liquids would normally be used




for collection of hydrocarbon and other organic vapors.  The relatively low




capacities of organic absorbents have minimized the utility of this approach




to hydrocarbon control.




            5)  Condensation




          Condensation normally involves the reduction of temperature of a




vapor-air mixture to a point below which the concentration of the vapor exceeds




the saturation vapor pressure.  The  technique  is most  suitable for higher




vapor concentrations   as substantial quantities of vapor may coexist




with the liquid phas<5  even at the  colder  temperatures  practically obtainable.




Condensation  for air pollution control  is generally used as a pretreatment




to reduce the load on  a more efficient process, such as adsorption or




Incineration.




            6)  Substitution of Materials




          The substitution of photochemically nonreactive materials as a




stationary source control measure has been largely limited to the use of solvents




in degreasing operations, surface  coatings and printing inks.  A prime example
                                      2-43

-------
exists in architectural surface coatings,  where the evaporating solvent




cannot be confined for disposal.  Use of the approach in cleaning solvents




and in industrial surface coatings is largely dependent upon technological




and economic parameters.  In some cases satisfactory reformulation of products




with nonreactive solvents has been difficult, and in some cases the increased




costs are greater than those for control equipment.




    2.  Nitrogen Oxides




          The control of nitrogen oxides from technological sources is at




present very much in a developmental stage.  For those sources involving the




production of such emissions as a by-product of high temperature combustion,




major effort is being devoted to process and design modifications which will




result in minimizing the formation of nitric oxide.  Fundamentally, this




means avoidance of peak temperatures and pressures.  Some effort is directed




towards evaluation of stack gas removal, although even greater developmental




problems are expected here.




          Emission control of nitrogen oxides from chemical processes may be




viewed from either the process alteration or vent gas removal approach.



        a.  Proposed Motor Vehicle Controls




          At present, control of nitrogen oxides from motor vehicles has




reached only the laboratory or demonstration phase.  Consequently, all control




approaches must be viewed as potential.  Essentially, all the nitrogen oxides




emissions from motor vehicles are in the exhaust gases resulting from tbf
                                      2-44

-------
fixation of nitrogen with air in the engine during combustion of fuel and air.




This is true for gas turbine engines as well as conventional gasoline piston




and dieael engines.




          Major control efforts to date have been based upon attempts to




reduce the formation of nitrogen oxides rather than control them in the




exhaust, although the latter approach has certainly not been rejected.  Because




nitrogen oxides production is enhanced by high flame temperatures and relative




oxygen concentrations, most control approaches involve either flame




temperature reduction, air/fuel ratio alteration, or some combination of both.




In most cases, the two factors interact.




          Specific control approaches now being considered all suffer some




potential drawbacks:  They may alter engine performance from the standpoint




of drivability or economy; they may add considerably to the complexity or




expense of the engine, e.g., fuel availability, vehicle range; finally, they




may complicate the control of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide.




          Most development activity now underway utilizes one of the




following approaches:




            1)  Inert Gas Dilution




          Recirculated exhaust gas or even water injection can be used as a




heat sink during combustion and thus reduce flame temperature.  Some power




is sacrificed and engine operations may be rough unless the charge is very




well homogenized.
                                     2-45

-------
            2)  Air/Fuel Ratio Adjustment




          Enrichment or leaning, I.e.,  excess fuel in the former and excess air




In the latter, will reduce nitrogen oxides formation by changing the oxygen




content away from that amount optimum for maximum NO  production.  Fuel




enrichment would require additional measures to control hydrocarbon and




carbon monoxide.  Excess air is limited by engine stalling.




            3)  Combustion Alteration




          A variety of techniques can be classified here, including ignition




timing, injection timing (in injected engines), use of precombustion chambers,




stratified charging, and better homogenization.  All are designed to reduce




peak flame temperatures.




            4)  Fuel Alteration




          Liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gases (propane and




butane) and nongasoline fuels have all been considered as an approach to




nitrogen oxides control.  In some cases they can be burned with higher




quantities of excess air or they may have lower heat content as compared




to gasoline.  In either case, reduced flame temperatures result.



            5)  Catalytic Reactors




          Exhaust gas treatment with either reduced or mixed oxidation/




reduction catalysts are under consideration as an alternative to engine




modifications.  These act to reduce the nitric oxide in the exhaust to




nitrogen.  Major practice problems such as catalyst life have been




encountered.
                                      2-46

-------
          The above list should not be considered complete.




a summary of the most general approaches to control of nitrogen oxides, many




combinations of which are under consideration.  More drastic "low emission"




approaches are discussed briefly under hydrocarbon controls.




        b.  Stationary Source Controls




          Control of nitrogen oxides from stationary sources, as in the case




of motor vehicle controls, may be covered under the broad categories of




combustion alteration or stack gas removal.  However, there is generally more




latitude available for consideration of the various alternatives in at least




some of the stationary sources.




          In the case of large combustion units the major design objective




is to reduce peak temperatures.  Techniques under consideration or trial




include altered burner design, change in burner placement, stage combustion,




exhaust gas recirculation, steam or water injection, and control of excess




air.  Although details obviously differ, there is a great deal of inherent




similarity here as compared to motor vehicle controls; consequently, little




additional space is given to examining these control methods.  The major




consideration is to obtain the maximum nitrogen oxides reduction consistent




with safety and fuel economy.




          Somewhat greater consideration has been given to nitrogen oxides




removal from stationary source stack gases than from the motor vehicle.  For




combustion sources some of the specific processes which are being considered




include:
                                     2-47

-------
            1)  Reinluft Char Process



          Activated char is used to remove primarily sulfur dioxide,  but will



also remove some NO by oxidation and subsequent adsorption.




            2)  Tyco Modified Lead Chamber Process



          The chemistry of the lead chamber process is used in which



concentrated sulfuric acid removes both sulfur and nitrogen oxides.




            3)  Atomics International Molten Carbonate Process



          Molten carbonate salts are used to absorb oxides of sulfur and ni-



trogen.  The latter are removed at about 20 to 30 percent of the efficiency



for sulfur dioxide.



            4)  Limestone Scrubbing Process



          Pilot studies indicate that 20 percent of the nitric oxide present




in the stack gases is removed in the wet limestone (or other alkali)



scrubbing process designed for sulfur dioxide removal.



          Other stack gas removal techniques are used for nitrogen oxides in



the tail gases of chemical plants using nitric acid.  Final cleanup techniques



are usually designed to catalytlcally reduce the nitrogen oxides to nitrogen.



Effluent streams are usually lower in volume and higher in NO  concentration



ir, chemical plants as compared to large combustion processes, thus making the



design process somewhat simpler.



F.  NATURE OF PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTANTS



    1.  Hydrocarbon Classes and Properties



          Hydrocarbons are compounds whose molecules contain atoms of hydrogen



and carbon only.  All compounds of carbon, except the oxides of carbon  and the
                                      2-48

-------
carbonates, are organic compounds.  This class, therefore, Includes the




hydrocarbons as well as many other carbon compounds having additional




elements such as oxygen, nitrogen, and chlorine.




          The hydrocarbons of interest in this document are those which may




be encountered in the gas phase in urban atmosphere, especially those




emitted into the atmosphere as contaminants by air pollution sources.




Regardless of their further classification, which is discussed below, the




volatility of hydrocarbons is approximately determined by their carbon number.




Those having carbon numbers of 1 to 4 are gaseous at ordinary temperatures,




while those with carbon numbers of 5 or more are liquids or solids in the




pure state.  (Liquid mixtures of hydrocarbons, such as gasoline, may Include




some proportion of compounds which in the pure state would be either gases




or solids.)  Hydrocarbons having a carbon number (i.e., number of carbon




atoms in each molecule) greater than 12 are generally not sufficiently volatile




to reach troublesome concentrations in the atmosphere in the gas phase; however,




many of these higher hydrocarbons, as particles or associated with particulate




matter, are important air contaminants in another context.




          Hydrocarbons fall into three main classes which are defined in terms




of their general molecular structure:  aliphatic, aromatic, and alicyclic.



Aliphatic hydrocarbons are all those whose carbon atoms are arranged in



chains only—with or without branching chains, but without rings.  Aromatic




hydrocarbons are all those whose carbon skeletons include benzene rings, i.e.,




3ix-membered carbon rings with only one additional atom (of hydrogen or




carbon) attached to each atom in the ring.  A subsidiary classification often
                                      2-49

-------
used is that of saturated vs. unsaturated.  A saturated hydrocarbon is one



with each of its carbon atoms bonded to four other atoms, generally carbon or




hydrogen; an unsaturated hydrocarbon is one with one or more carbon atoms bonded



co less than four other atoms.  Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons all



correspond to the empirical formula C H.  _, where ri is the carbon number.



Saturated alicyclics with one ring have the formula C H. ; those with two
                                                     n /n



rings have the formula C H_ _•?' aiu* 80 on<  ^11 aromatic hydrocarbons are



vmsaturated.



          The classes of hydrocarbons, their properties in general, and




particular compounds of importance are discussed in the remainder of this



section.



        a.  Aliphatic Hydrocarbons



          Subclasslficatlon of aliphatic hydrocarbons is based principally



upon the extent and type of unsaturation evident in their molecular structure.



In the modern, systematic nomenclature, saturated aliphatics are known as



alkanes; unsaturated aliphatics with no triple bonds are alkenes; and those



with triple bonds (characterized by pairs of adjacent carbon atoms each



connected to only one other atom) are alkynes.  In structural formulae, the



double bond is represented by two lines between a pair of adjacent carbon



atoms, e.g., OC, and the triple bond by three lines, e.g., C»C.



          In older but still widely used terminology, alkanes are paraffins,



alkenes are olefina and alkynes are acetylenes.  The corresponding terras  we




synonymous and are so used in the chemical profession.  A systematic
                                      2-50

-------
procedure for naming organic compounds hae been developed by the International


Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).   A comprehensive treatment of  these  rules


can be found in various treatises and texts in organic chemistry;  in this


section, common names of the better known compounds are given,  as  well as


IUPAC names and any frequently used alternatives.


            1)  Alkanes (Paraffins)

          Generally, alkanes are relatively stable and unreactive  hydrocarbons


whose chemical reactions depend upon breaking carbon-hydrogen bonds.  Such


differences in reactivity as exist between them depend on the number of


hydrogen atoms occupying certain positions relative to the carbon  skeleton  of


the molecule, which in turn depends on the degree  of branching of  the carbon


skeleton.  Hydrogen atoms in hydrocarbon molecules are classed as  primary,


secondary or tertiary according to whether the carbon atoms to which they are


bonded are also bonded to one, two or three other  carbon atoms. Thus, in


          H H                                                              H H  H

          II                                                              III
ethane, H-C-C-H, there are six primary hydrogen atoms, while in propane, H-C-C-C-H,


          H H                                                              H H  H


there are six primary and two secondary hydrogen atoms.


          In the straight-chain paraffins ("normal" alkanes or n-alkanes),

all hydrogen atoms are primary or secondary.   The  least reactive are the


lowest two members of the class, methane and ethane, in which all  hydrogen


atoms are primary.  Branched paraffins, also called isoparaffins,  isoalkanes,

or i-alkanes, often have tertiary hydrogen atoms,  which confer somewhat higher

reactivity.
                                     2-51

-------
                a)  tk-Alkanes



          Table 2-11 lists names,  formulae and boiling points of the n-alkanes




by carbon number through 10.  The  lowest members of the series, methane, ethane



and propane, are the main constituents of natural gas, of which methane



usually constitutes 90 percent or  more (by volume).  The higher boiling



paraffin gases, propane and butane, are important constituents of liquid



petroleum gas (LFG), and the paraffins of carbon number 5 and over ars



constituents of gasoline.



                b)  i-Alkanes
          Table 2-12 presents carbon skeletons, names and boiling points of



all the Isoalkanes of carbon numbers 4, 5 and 6.  With higher carbon numbers



there are larger numbers of isomers:  7 for carbon number 7, 15 for carbon



number 8, etc.  Consequently, many such compounds exist in the boiling




range of gasoline.



            2)  Alkenes (Olefins)



          The alkenes are generally somewhat more reactive than most alkanes



because substituent atoms can be added to their structures without the



necessity of rupturing carbon-hydrogen bonds.  Due to the wide variety of



individual modes of action with different reagents, further generalizations



regarding reactivity are not warranted.  Table 2-13 presents carbon skeletons,



names, and boiling points of all the monoalkenes of carbon numbers up to 5;



there are larger numbers of isomers for higher carbon numbers.  For exaaple,
                                      2-52

-------
Table 2-H. PROPERTIES OF SOME n-ALKANES-
Carbon Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Name
Methane
Ethane
0
Propane
Butane
Pentane
Hexane
Heptane
Octane
Nonane
Decanc
Formula
CH,
C2H6
C3H8
C4H10
C5H12
C6H14
C7H16
C8H18
C9H20
C10H22
Boillna Point, °C
7
-161.7
- 88.6
- 42.2
- 0.5
36.1
68.7
98.4
125.6
150.7
174.0
                              2-53

-------
            Table 2-12.   PROPERTIES OF SOME ISOALKANES.
Carbon Number      Carbon Skeleton
                        Name
Boiling Point "C
                   «  0  I
                  -c-c-c-
                        Isobutane

                        (2-nethylpropane)
     -10
                   «  *  »  «
                  - O(J-C-C-
                         Isopentane

                         (2-nethylbutane)
     28
 a
•o
                                             Neopentane

                                             (2,2-dimethylpropane)
                                                       10
                   i  «  •  i  «
                  -c-c-c-c-c-
                         2-Methylpentane
     60
                   t « i  *  i
                  .c-c-c-c-c-
                         3-Methylpentane
                   a I  i i
                  -C-C.-C-C-
                                             2,2-Dimethylbutane
                                                       50
                                             2,3-Dimethylbutane
                                                       58
                                        2-54

-------
Table 2-13.   PROPERTIES OF SOME ALKENES (OLEFINS).
Carbon Number
      Carbon Skeleton
     -CaC-
      i i
     -c*c-c-
      III
     -c«c-c-c
       1 1  1  1
     -C^C»C"C-
       «  i «  i




     -C-CeC-6-
       I  i    «
     -CsC-C-
           • I <
      CcC-C-C-C-
      i  i  i i *
       '     i 1
     -C-CsC-C-C-
       1  1  \  1 I
     -C«C-C-C-
Kane
                                             Ethylene

                                             (Ethene)
                                             Propylene

                                             (Propene)
                                             1-Butene





                                             cts-2-Butene





                                             trans-2-Butene
                                             Isobutene

                                             (2-Methylpropene)
                                             1-Pentene





                                             cls-2-Pentene





                                             jtrans-2-P entene





                                             3-Me thy 1- 1-b u tene
Boiling Point.*C





     -102







     -48







     -6





     -4





   ' -3  .





     -7
                               30





                               36
                                                               25

                                2-Mc thy 1-1-bu tene
                                                                           31
       1  '    '
       6-c=c-c
                                             2-Methyl-2-butene

                                             (Trine thy le thy lene)
                               38
                             2-55

-------
there are 14 isomers of carbon number 6,  Including pairs of optical isomers.



It should be noted that 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene is commonly called



tetramethylethylene.



          Ethylene is the most abundant olefin in auto exhausts, and



therefore is presumably the most abundant in urban atmospheres.  Of all the



aliphatic hydrocarbons, it is the only on* known to produce any biological



action at concentrations thus far observed in urban atmospheres; this is a



phytotoxic effect, especially damaging to some flowers.



          Alkenes having two double bonds in the molecule are also known;



the simplest are propadiene or allene, C~H,:  (-C-OC-); 1,2-butadiene or



methallene, (-OOC-C-); and 1,3-butadiene  (-OC-OC-).  The last is of



particular Interest because it may be a precursor of acrolein, a particularly



potent eye irritant in photochemical smog.



            3)  Alkynes  (Acetylenes)



          Alkynes contain one or more triple bonds  (in addition to any double



bonds) in the molecule.  The first member of the series is acetylene or



ethyne, C2H2  (H-CEC-H);  the next, methylacetylene or propyne  (H-CSC-CH-).



These two compounds are  found in auto exhaust, but are relatively inert  in



photochemical reactions.



        b.  Aromatjc Hydrocarbons



          Aromatic hydrocarbons comprise benzene and many  compounds with



structures related  to  that of benzene.  The structure of benzene, C,K,,  is that
                                                                   o c


of  a simple,  symmetrical ring of six carbon atoms,  to each of which a hydrogen
                                      2-56

-------
atom is attached.  For convenience, the benzene structure is usually



represented by a hexagon with three double bonds, without any representation



of the carbon or hydrogen atoms.  Thus:
                                             benzene, C,H,
                                                       o o
Other aromatic hydrocarbons are shown with substituent groups attached to the



ring, with the implication that each substituent group has replaced one



hydrogen atom.  Thus:
CH,
                                             CH.
                                             mesitylene or 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,
                                      CH3





          The prefixes £-, m-, and p_ (for ortho, meta, and para) are used to



Ascribe the relative positions of substituents on the ring when there are two



substituents.  Thus, there are three dimethylbenzenes, commonly known as



xylenes; in pj-xylene, the substituent methyl groups occupy adjacent ring



positions; in m-xylene they are separated by one ring position, and in



g~xylene they are separated by two.  When there are more than two substituents,



they are designated by numbering the ring positions.
                                      2-57

-------
Table 2-14 shows names, structural formulae and boiling points of some of the



lower aromatics.  All the aromatics of carbon numbers 6, 7 and 8 are included,



but not all of carbon number 9.  Although the aromatic hydrocarbons are



unsaturated, their ring structures are less susceptible to addition of



substituents than are the double bonds of alkenes.  Benzene itself is



practically inert to reactions in the photochemical smog complex.  Where the



side-chain substituents contain double bonds, as in styrene, addition reactions



are likely to involve these double bonds and to leave the ring structure intact.



          Many aromatic compounds have more than one benzene ring, or "fused"



ring structures, of which naphthalene is an example:
                                                       , naphthalene.
However, all these compounds have carbon numbers of 10 or more.  They are



therefore not very volatile, not abundant in gasoline or auto exhaust, and



of little importance in photochemical smog.



        c.  Alicyclic Hydrocarbons  (Naphthenea)



          Alicyclic hydrocarbons are divided into the cycloalkanes, the



cycloalkenes and  the cycloalkynes,  sometimes called eyeloparaffins, cyclo-



olefins, and cycloacetylenes, respectively.  These classes are analogous to



the  classes of aliphatic hydrocarbons discussed above, being b&c .d on the



degree  and type of unsaturation in  the molecule.  Their reactivity is for the
                                      2-58

-------
            Table  2-14.  PROPERTIES OF SOME AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS.
Carbon
               Structure
     Name
                                   Benzene
                                   Toluene
                                    (Methylbenzene)
Boiling Point,°c
                                          80
                                          111
  8
                           CH,
                        CH-,
£-Xylene
 (1,2-Dimethylbenzene)
                                   m-Xylene
                                    (1,3-Dlmethylbenzene)
                                                                             144.0
                                          139.3
                CH.
         CH,
                                   £.~Xylene
                                    O.,4-Dimethylbenzene)
                                          138.5
                                   Ethylbenzene
                                          136
                                    Styrene
                          >-CH-CH2  CVinylbenzene)
                                          146

                                    Phenylacetylene
                           >-CHCH    (Ethynylbenzene)
                                          2-59

-------
                   Table 2-14.   (Cont'd)
    Structure
                             *«*                         Boiling Point
 CH3
CH3
/f       A
        \^ -CH.-
                         Cumene
            C            (Isopropylbenzene)

            -C-CH3

            CH,
                              2-60
                        Mesitylene
                         (1.3.5 Trioethylbenzene)                  165
                         ^-Propylbenzene

-------
most part similar to that of corresponding aliphatics of the same carbon




number and degree of unsaturation.  However, some of the alicyclics, with




three- or four-membered rings, are appreciably less resistant to certain




reagents than are the corresponding aliphatics.  Names of the basic ring




structures are also analogous to those of the corresponding aliphatics.




Names and boiling points of some of the unsubstituted cycloalkanes are




presented in Table 2-15.  Cyclopentane, cyclohexane and some of their




alkyl derivatives, such as methylcyclopentane, are present in appreciable




proportions in gasoline and automobile exhaust.




    2.  Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air




          Table 2-16 lists the individual hydrocarbons detected in samples of




urban air by gas chromatographic analysis in several investigations. '  '




A total of 56 compounds have been thus detected, of which 17 were alkanes,




23 alkenes (including two alkadienes), 2 alkynes, 10 aromatics, 3 cycloalkanes




and 1 cycloalkene.  It is certain that the length of this list is limited only




by the sensitivity of the analytical methods, and that many additional




hydrocarbon compounds are actually present in urban air, although in lower




concentrations than those listed.  Especially at the higher carbon numbers,




the complexity of the chromatographic records becomes so great that the effort




to interpret them in terms of individual compounds may be insufficiently




rewarding.  For this reason the list in the table must be considered as




severely truncated for carbon numbers of 7 and higher.
                                     2-61

-------
         Table 2- 15.  PROPERTIES OF SOME CYCLOALKANES.
Carbon Number        Name           Formula              Boiling Pointy °C







                                                           -33





                                                             12





                                                             49





                                                             81





                                                           117





                                                           147
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cyclopropane
Cyclobutane
Cyclopentane
Gyclohexane
Cycloheptane
. Cyclooctane
C3H6
C4H8
C5H10
C6H12
C7H14
C«H1A
                                     2-62

-------
       Table  2-16.  SOME HYDROCARBONS IDENTIFIED IN AMBIENT AIR.
Carbon
Kumber

   1

   2
Class

Alkane

Alkane

Alkene

Alkyne

Alkane

Alkene



Alkyne

Alkane



Alkene
                  Alkane
                  Alkene
Compound

Methane

Ethane

Ethylene

Acetylene

Propane

Propylene

Propadiene

Methylacetylene

Butane

Isobutane

1-Bur.ene

.cls.-2-Butene

trans-2-Butene

Isobijtene

1,3-Butadiene

Pentane

Isopentane

1-Pentene


-------
Carbon

Number
                  Cycloalkane


                  Cycloalkene


                  Alkane
        Table 2-16.  (Cont'd).




Class          Compound


               3-Methyl-l-butene


               2-Mathyl-l,3-butadiene


               Cyclopentane



               Cyclopentene


               Hexane



               2-Methylpentane


               3-Methylpentane



               2,2-Dixnethylbutane


               2,3-Dimethylbutane



Alkene         1-Hexene


               cls-2-Hexene



               trans-2-Hexene


               cis-3-Hexene



               trans-3-Hexene


               2-Methyl-l-pentene


               4-Methyl-l-pentene


               4-Methyl-2-pentene


               Benzene


               Cyclohexane



               Methylcyclopentane


                2-Methylhexane
                                  *

                3-Methylhexane


                2,3-Dimethylpentane


                2,A-DImethylpentane



 Aromatic       Toluene
                 .  Aromatic


                   Cycloalkane






                   Alkane
Kefarencea


c





a,c


«,c


a,c


a,c


a,c


a»c


a,c


a


a


a


a


a


a   -


a


a


a


a


a


a


a


 a


 a


 a,b
                                   2-64

-------
                         Table 2-16.   (Cont'd).
Carbon
Mumber
   8
   10
                  Class
                  Alkane
                  Aromatic
                  Aromatic
                  Aromatic
            34
                      35
a = Neligan
b = Altshuller et al.
c = Stephens and Burleson
Compound
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
0;-Xylene
Hb-Xylene
£-Xylene
ni-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1,2,A-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
s ec-butylbenzene
Referencee
a
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
                              2-65

-------
          All the hydrocarbons above carbon number 4 listed in Table 2-16 are


                  34
found in gasoline.    These and the lower alkenes and acetylenes are also



found in automobile exhaust gases.  The lower alkanes (methane, ethane and



propane) are minor constituents of auto exhaust, but constitute the major



fraction of most natural gas.  Stephens and Burleson have reported that the



hydrocarbon composition of their samples resembled that of auto exhaust with

                                              o

an addition of natural gas and gasoline vapor.   However, samples taken in



industrial areas and near the smoke plume from a brush fire have shown



distinctive differences in composition which could reasonably be attributed



to these particular recognized sources.  Special studies such as these can be



very useful in Identifying the importance of various sources as contributors



to air pollution by hydrocarbons.



G.  REACTIVITY OF HYDROCARBONS IN THE PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG COMPLEX



          The concept that the importance of hydrocarbons and other organic



substances in emissions should be related to their relative ability to cause



the effects associated with photochemical air pollution has gained wide



acceptance.  Measurements of the manifestations of photochemical smog are of



particular interest in this connection because of the relatively Immediate and



direct impact of these phenomena on the affected public.  At the same time,



chemical measurements of the accumulation of secondary pollutants, as weJl as



their rates of accumulation and the rates of consumption of the precursors,



give clues to the relative contributions of both primary and secondary



contaminants in determining the course of smog development.  These relationships



are explored in the following paragraphs.
                                     2-66

-------
                               Reproduced from
                                  available


          Many  laboratory  investigations have been carried out with mixtures


simulating atmospheric  contaminant  levels  eradiated with ultraviolet light


simulating the  actinic  fraction of  sunlight.   The results have indicated a


need to differentiate between  reactive and unreactive contaminants.  For this
                                              • '             * '  \ *

purpose, various scales of  reactivity have been devised.  As a biological


indicator, the  potential to produce eye irritation has been a favorite subject

                 o /:  -3-1

of investigation,   '    while chemical scales  have been based( on oxidant

             38                                 39
accumulation,   rate of hydrocarbon consumption   and rate of photo-oxidation

                40
of .nitric oxide.


   ! !•  Biological  Effects                      ;  >
   j.-.                '                           'i  '

          The relation  of measured  eye irritation to levels of hydrocarbons


and secondary contaminants  is  discussed elsewhere (see Chapter 1, Section B.3).

   i
In 'Various sets of  experiments it has appeared Well correlated with

   i
formaldehyde concentrations, but  this , relation Is not general.  Heuss and
   i ..                     (1 1 J , I  "__ '• '(   ." i1 ! •". '•' , \

Gl^sson have recently developed a reactivity  scale based on eye irritation

                                         f *                        07
developed in a  «r't^c^$J:i>.t; * " j t ' . , '  ! ,  • '  ?   , ,"
benzene derivatives having olefinie' side chains.   The authors noted that eye

           ' > ' " » 'k' U     ' ' •
irritation 'iri  tHesff £6£ts  had no evident relatioii to various chemical
                     t "

measures'* .{namely, tn^ Fate of formation of  nitrogen dioxide or ozone, the
    ... • . j .*ti.n.
        i"*     »-«    ' '
maximum ozone  (johcentration,  the hydrocarbon consumed, or the formaldehyde

               > ' ?• i, •
or peroxyacetyl ^nitrate  generated.   They suggested that peroxybenzoyl nitrate

  ;.._._   ____ 1 1
might be an  important contributor  to eye irritation.
                                      2-67

-------
     10
QC
C*.
          -  AROMATIC OLEFINS
8


7
      3


      2


      1


      0
                   1,3  -  BUTADIENE

                          BENZYLS
                              TERMINAL OCEFINS
                                     MULTIALKYLBENZENES
                               D
INTERNAL OLEFINS

      NON-BENZYLS
                                                   BENZEKE
                                      PARAFFINS
  Figure 2-2.  EYE IRRITATION REACTIVITY VS. HYDROCARBON STRUCTURE.37
                                 2-68
                                                           •,,.«'

-------
                    41
          Altshuller   concluded that olefins, alkylbenzen.es and aldehydes



are all responsible for biological effects, while the paraffins are



considerably less reactive.  Paraffins of carbon number 6 or more showed some



reactivity for biological effects, but lower paraffins, together with benzene



and acetylene, showed essentially none.



     2.  Chemical Effects



          Reactivity of individual hydrocarbons in terms of chemical effects


                                       42
was extensively reviewed by Altshuller.    Measured by rate of hydrocarbon



consumption, the 2-alkenes and 3-alkenes were most reactive, followed by tri-



and tetra-alkylbenzenes, 1-alkenes (excluding ethylene), dialkylbenzenes, and



ethylene.  Considered by the same measure, aldehydes were found to be



Intermediate between dialkylbenzenes and ethylene.  Less reactive than ethylene



were toluene, then paraffins, acetylene and benzene.



          A ranking based on the rate of photo-oxidation of nitric oxide to



nitrogen dioxide yielded generally the same order of reactivities, but



discordant results were obtained in rankings based on various measures of


                42
maximum oxidant.    These discrepancies probably arise from the fact that



ozone has very much the character of an intermediate in the photo-oxida;:ion



system, being both generated and consumed at rates much faster than its rate



of accumulation.  Consequently, the ozone level is very sensitive to



variations in the experimental conditions imposed in the different studies.
                                      2-69

-------
          A specific rating scale based on rates of photo-oxidation has been


                    A3
set forth by Caplan,   with numerical estimates for various hydrocarbon



classes as follows.  Least reactive,  Class I (specific reactivity 0),  includes



methane, ethane, propane, the acetylenes and benzene.  Class II (specific



reactivity 2) includes monoalkybenzenes, alkanes of carbon number 4 or more,



ortho- and para-dialkylbenzenes, and  cycloaklabes.  Class III (specific



reactivity 5) comprises ethylene, meta dialkylbenzenes, and aldehydes.  Class IV



(specific reactivity 10) includes 1-alkenes besides ethylene, alkadienes, and



multlalkylbensenes.  Class V (specific reactivity 30) comprises



1,2-dialkylethylenes.  Class VI, most reactive (specific reactivity 100),



Includes tri- and tetra-alkylcthylenes and cycloalkenes.


                              41
          As Altshuller notes,   hydrocarbon consumption rates and nitrogen



dioxide formation rates define reactivity scales having a much wider range



than those useful for biological effects.  This is probably because the



biological effects depend on levels or dosages of certain contaminants rising



above certain threshold values.  Further, the formation of certain products



can relate to details of molecular structure quite differently than do the



rates of reaction.



     3-  Composition Indicators



          To overcome the difficulties cited, Altshuller has developed a



composite reactivity scale based on product yields combined with biological


                     41
effects measurements.    Considering that precision of experimental reaves



warranted no very broad numerical range for such a scale, he converted each



type of indicator to a scale of integers from 0 to 10, thus obtaining the



estimates shown in Table 2-17.


                                       2-70

-------








e
o
Q CO
O W
p* C
*u tyj
1^ **<
OQ fmj

J** 5j
M O
S£
5S
*£ PH
r»^ h^
J^rH
W •»
H OS •
H O CO
CO Px, W
O CO
Oj CO CO
ft S ^
O O M
CJ H CJ
Q U co
S5 H 3
B^D
t^l
05
W 55
£3*
M CJ tn
> M O
M O
H O co
CJ r-J X

CO
H










TJ 01
eu co
oo d
CO O
rJ P.
Q) CO
> eu
•5 OS



OOOrHCl -3-l-»»O»4a CO 1



C
•rH
CU
w oe
C eB
to g
rH (0
CU O
o i *o
tn 00 rH O -O ** S
0000<|>^J>0^rH+ ^ Jg

cs eu
rH
X) XI
(3 3 •
tO o CJ
I *rl r-1
01 CO C
rH 4J O
q) > U 4J
co ta )«
M
O - .
A COOOOCOTJ. SiZSJ
OOOO^^^rH^^+ g^g
^ ^ ^ w -H x:
3 SO
. X» rH
CU 1 CO U
rH • 4J rH tt) >>
(0 (01 C CJ
O rH
«J O
CO
0 0
(J
c eg
0 •<
eu
CO 1
C rH CU
O CO ""O
Cu B >
co u. x:
cu o cu
ftSfcTj .___--
O C *J rH CO
CMOOO-O r-IO O ^^tJ?
OOOOtN ^^rH+ ^ g . 3 « .g g-g
COcOcdOlXIa)
(3 -H 31 J-»
«r4 -0 O4 CM X! 3
<4-( CO 60X1
IM M O 31
tO Vt 4J CU O CN
oo n -H cut
XI rHrH^S-vO-O CO WCUXIrH
OOOOesi soil) 1 + O-SP SS r^
rveocN^- C eucx:
CO -H 
CJ »H fj _Q CO 01
^5 Ll U-l rH CU — I
1 CJ
rS 4-»
X rH td
O >> r4
h CJ 4J
£ * £
P^ 35 - . , —
O eu IM 4J 13
1 W 3 XI 31
OO «o , 4J n 0 at xt •> o v « >-, M W «-•
Cfl O rH rH CU 01 >>
,3 4) fH rH J=
o M-I cd to c c "
I »w > 4J o o eu
u eu to C o
X! CO CO 
3
co
i co M co e 4J • 4J i
rH vH04J-3C«UC, CO cfl tO(-ifl>C4)
MW ,? 1 CU ,4 » TS 0) B , WrHrHXMCkjO
co «4J(U •Hxstflx: lucfltuscua--'
C IOON Ki 3CCU V4-H4J «CU«iJ
•S CS d U 0-SrH «>>,f=-UCdl£-£
*H -H-acu -o^j- > S^S^So
«M IWCXl -0 ei)CO OrHg4JSlEO
CO U-l CO rH CJ C XrH rH -H O rH CX
UQ) <0N-'>» CQCOtOtOrHOcJ •O»u' 	
toe M ^cueuc >»ei) cuorHjiieuj^Nw.'Tax: >j>>cua)r-i6<""'c
CJ4JN+3C>.rHrHrHc:OT< >CUO>4-iCl-'-
rHytt) vOoB'-'I'rl'HXlCXlrH <>ZW«-J'-Jh~ir'1
UcOXtCj4J CUrHnOTI ft tO CflXtCJ-OCU iw
2-71

-------
          This sort of reactivity rating has advantages,  particularly if there



is to be a comparative consideration of techniques for abatement of



photochemical precursor emissions Involving some control  of the composition



of emissions.  For example, on the basis of hydrocarbon consumption rates or



of nitric oxide photo-oxidation rates, the control of 2-alkenes and 3-alkenes



would appear to be very critical because of their high values on these scales,



while the control of other alkenes and of alkylbenzenes would be expected to



have a much smaller effect.  Such expectations, however,  are not supported



by the product yields of biological indicators.  Thus the Altshuller scale




tends to avoid undue weighting of those compounds with high reaction rates but



relatively low potential for photochemical smog manifestations.



          If a reactivity scale is to have value beyond that of ranking



particular compounds according to selected characteristics, one useful function



would be to predict the behavior of mixtures of the rated compounds.  Altshuller



et al., in the course of an intensive study of the photo-oxidation of




propylene, investigated the extent to which the behavior of propylene miRht be


                                               35
considered to approximate that of auto exhaust.    On the scale described in



Table 2-17, automobile exhaust was found to have average reactivity significantly



less than that of propylene—in fact, between  toluene and ethylene.  On the



scale described by Caplan  (see paragraph 2. above), the average reactivities



of auto exhaust fell between ethylene and propylene.  However, auto exhaust



under similar experimental conditions yielded  somewhat higher values of




oxidant and peroxyacetyl nitrates than did propylene.  The discrepancies were
                                       2-72

-------
reduced when tests were run with less initial nitric oxide.  It is evident




from the comparison that pure propylene can serve as an approximate analogue.




for automobile exhaust in chamber irradiation studies, but only in a rather




gross approximation.  With a composite reactivity scale based on product




yields and biological effects and having a rather limited response range, it




may be possible to develop analytical procedures based on simple fractionation




of the hydrocarbon contaminants for use in estimating reactivity of the




atmospheric mix, or of hydrocarbons emitted from particular sources, such as




auto exhaust.




H.  PROPERTIES OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN




           Seven oxides of nitrogen are known:  NJ3  (nitrous oxide), NO  (nitric




oxide), N203  (nitrogen sesquioxide), N02  (nitrogen  dioxide), N_0,  (dinitrogen




tetroxide, dimer of N02), N,,05  (nitrogen pentoxide), and NO- (nitrogen




trioxide).  Nitrous oxide is a natural constituent  of the atmosphere,




is not considered to be an air contaminant and is not detected by analytical




methods for the other oxides.  Of the remaining compounds only nitric oxide




and nitrogen dioxide are directly emitted to the atmosphere.




          Nitrogen trioxide and nitrogen pentoxide are thought to take part




in some of the important atmospheric reactions (see Chapter 4), but




equilibrium  and  reaction kinetics  factors  do  not  favor  their accumulation




to significant  (or  even  measurable)  levels.   Nitrogen sesquioxide




 (N-O^)  is the anhydride  of  nitrous  acid,  HNO-, but  it exists only in
                                      2-73

-------
equilibrium with NO and NO-, and at atmospheric concentrations of the latter



gases is insignificant.  A summary of the physical properties of the several



oxides of nitrogen Is given in Table 2-18.



     1.  Nitric Oxide



          Nitric oxide represents over 90 percent of the significant nitrogen



oxides emitted to the atmosphere.  It is a colorless gas, sparingly soluble



in water, and boils at -151.8*C.  It is formed during high temperature



combustion processes according to the following endothermic reaction:



                            1/2 N2 + 1/2 02 + NO



The equilibrium concentration increases with rising temperature.  Even though



nitric oxide is unstable at ambient temperatures, the rate of decomposition is



exceedingly small.  Thus, as combustion gases are rapidly cooled, nitric oxide



in relatively high concentration is said to exist in a state of frozen



equilibrium.



     2.  Nitrogen Dioxide



          Nitrogen dioxide exists in equilibrium with its dimer dinitrogen



tetroxide (N_0.) according to the following equation:



                                 2N02 t N204




At atmospheric concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, however, the fraction



present in dimer form  is negligible.  Nitrogen dioxide is a corrosive gas of



high oxidizing power,  and is important not only as the primary receptor of



ultraviolet energy from the sun required in the photochemical ax&og reactions,



but as an irritant and toxic compound.  It has a characteristic pungent odor,



is reddish-brown in color, and boils at 21.3°c.





                                       2-74

-------
w
8
w
a
w
M
H
o
ai
o
M
CO
1
CO
 (fl
 H
o
•H >,
i-l i-l
0 >
0) 09
O. H
c/i O
If
•H AJ
r-4 C
•rl -H
O O

oo
p
«J C
rH iH
0) O
X ft*
Formula















w
3
n)



vO
CM
O
cr>
sr
00
00
1
U
o
CM
O
r-»
1
O
IN
2







vO
CM
QO
i— t

vO
VO
1
§







 sr fl
n^ Vf> r^Q
. a
rH rH 3
g
IH r». §
fsj ^sf *•*
§

n g
t> o 2
1 CO jjj
§
1 ^|
CM O O f
§ aT sT §

01  1J V-l
•a *j o. w

c c c c
01 ,
                                                                                                              •a
                                                                                                              c
                                                                                                               a)
                                                                                                              x:
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                              ,0
                                                                                                              13


                                                                                                              I
                                                                                                               e
                                                                                                               o
                                                     2-75

-------
          Only very small quantities of nitrogen dioxide are emitted directly



to the atmosphere.  The conditions for its formation in high-temperature



combustion processes during which nitric oxide is formed are quite unfavorable,



but some is emitted from chemical processes using concentrated nitric acid.



Although total quantities on a nationwide basis are low, significant



Atmospheric concentrations are possible in highly localized cases.
                                      2-76

-------
                                 REFERENCES






 1.  Migcotte, M. V., Phys., Rev., 7_3, 519 (1948).




 2.  Koyama, T., J. Geophys, Res., 68, 3759 (1963).




 3.  Ehhalt, D. H., J. Air Pollut., Control Association, 17, 518-519.




 4.  Rasmusserv, R. A., and Went, F. W., "Volatile Material of Plant




     Origin in the Atmosphere," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 53_, 215-220 (1965).




 5.  Junge, C. E., "Air Chemistry and Radioactivity," p. 95 Academic Press,




     New York, N.Y. (1963).




 6.  Fink, U., Rant, D. H., and Wiggins, T. A., J.  Opt. Soc. Amer., 572-574




     (1964).




 7.  Goldberg, L., and Muller, E. A., J. Opt.  Soc.  Amer.. 43_, 1033-1036




     (1953).




 8.  Stephens, E. R., and Burleson, "Distribution of Light Hydrocarbons in




     Ambient Air," paper #69-122, 62nd Annual  Meeting, Air Poll. Cont.  Assoc.,




     New York, N.Y., June 1969.




 9.  Cavanagh, L. A., Schadt, C. F., and Robinson,  E., Env. Sci. and Tech., _3_,




     251-257 (1969).




10.  Swinnerton, J. W., Linnenbon, V. J., Cheek, C. H., Env. Sci. Tech., _3>




     836-838 (1969).




11.  Altshuller, A. P., Bellar, T. A., J. Air  Poll. Cont. Aasoc., 13. 81-87




     (1963).




12.  Altshuller, A. P., Ortman, G. C., Saltzman, B. E., and Neligan, R. £.,




     J.  Air Poll. Cont. Assoc., 16, 87-91 (1966).
                                     2-77

-------
13.  Robinson, E., Robbing, R. C., "Gaseous Atmospheric Pollutants from Urban
     and Natural Sources," Paper 69-155, 62nd Annual Meeting, Air Pollution
     Control Association, Now York, June 1969.
14.  Lodge, J., Pate, J. B., Sci., 153. 408 (1966).
15.  Junge, C. E., Tellua. £, 127 (1956).
16.  Hamilton, H. L., et al., "An Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry Study on
     Pike's Peak in Support of Pulmonary Edema Research," Research Triangle
     Institute, North Carolina, for Army Research Office, Contract No. DA-HC19-
     67-C-0029, 1968.
17.  Ripperton, L. A., et al., "Nitrogen Dioxide and Nitric Oxide in Non-Urban
     Air," Paper No. 68-122, 61st Annual Meeting, Air Pollution Control
     Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, June 1968.
18.  Tabular Data Provided by the National Air Pollution Control Administration,
     Criteria and Standards Branch, Durham, North Carolina.
19.  Mason, D. V., Ozolins, G., and Morlta, C. B., "Sources  and Air Pollutant
     Emission Patterns in Major Metropolitan Areas," Paper 69-101, Annual
     Meeting of APCA, New York, N.Y. (June 1969).
20.  Ozolins, S., "Nationwide Emission Estimates for the Year 1966," NIAPECF,
     National Air Pollution Control Administration (1969).
21.  Grant, E. P., "Auto Emissions," Motor Veh. Poll. Cont.  Board Bulletin,
     Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 3 (1967).
22.  "Motor Vehicles, Air Pollution and Health," a Report of the Surgsrr
     General to U.S. Congress, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and
     Welfare, Document No. 489, June 1962.
                                     2-78

-------
23.  McReynolds, L. A., Alquist, H.  E.,  and Wimmer,  D.  B.,  "Hydrocarbon




     Emissions and Reactivity as Functions of Fuel and  Engine Variables,"




     SAE Transactions, Vol. 74 (1966); SAE Progress in  Technology.  Vol. 12,




     Vehicle Emissions, Part II, p.  10 (1966).




24.  Neligan, R. E., et al., "Exhaust Composition in Relation to Fuel




     Composition," presented at the  33rd Annual Meeting of  APCA, Cincinnati,




     Ohio, May I960; APCA Journal, V^l.  11, p. 178 (1961).




25.  "Surveillance of Motor Vehicle  Emissions in California," Air Pollution




     Control Program Grant, Report No. J, California Department of Public




     Health, March 1966.




26.  Hass, G. C., and Brubacher, M.  L.,  "A Test Procedure for Motor Vehicle




     Exhaust Emissions," APCA Journal (November 1962).



27.  Duprey, R. L., "Compilation of  Air Pollutant Emission Factors," U.S.




     Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Environmental Health




     Series, Public Health Service Publication No. 999-AP-42, Durham, North




     Carolina, 1968.




28.  Wetmiller, R. S. an^ Endsley, L. E., Jr., "Effect  of Diesel Fuel on




     Exhaust Smoke and Odor," SAE Transactions, Vol. 50, 509 (December 1942).




29.  Millington, B. W., and French,  C. C. J., "Diesel Exhaust—A European




     Viewpoint," SAE Transactions, Vol.  75 (1967); SAE Progress in Technology,




     Vol. 12, Vehicle Emissions, Part II, p. 379  (1967)




30.  Procedure for Conducting Comprehensive Air Pollution Surveys, New York




     State Department of Health, Bureau  of Air Pollution Control Services,




     Albany, New York, August 18, 1965.
                                     2-79

-------
31.  Lozano, £.  R., et al., Air Pollution Emissions from Jet Engines,  Presented



     at the APCA Meeting, Cleveland,  Ohio, June 1967.



32.  Ozolins, G., and Smith, R., A Rapid Survey Technique for Estimating



     Community Air Pollution Emissions,  U.S. Department of Health,  Education



     and Welfare, Public Health Service, Publication No. 999-AP-29, Division



     of Air Pollution, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1966.




33.  Hills, J. S., et al., "Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Stationary



     Soutces in Los Angeles County,"  Report No. 3 (April 1961).



34.  Neligan, R. E., "Hydrocarbons in the Los Angeles Atmosphere,"  Arch.



     Environ. Health, 5., 581-591, 1962.



35.  Altshuller, A. P., Kopczynski, S. L., Lonneman, W. L., and Sutterfield,



     F. D., "A Technique for Measuring Photochemical Reactions in Atmospheric




     Samples," Sciencet submitted for publication.



36.  Wayne, L. G., "Eye Irritation as a  Biological Indicator of Photochemical



     Reactions in the Atmosphere," Atm.  Env., 1:97-104, 1967.



37.  Heuss, J. M., and Glasson, W. A., "Hydrocarbon Reactivity and  Eye



     Irritation," Environ. Sci. and Tech., 2:1109-1116, 1968.



38.  Haagen-Smit, A. J., and Fox, M.  M., "Ozone Formation in Photochemical



     Oxidation of Organic Substances," Ind. Eng. Chem., 48:1484-1487,  1956.



39.  Wimmer, D.  B., Coyner, H. N., and Grayson, J. T., "A Bench-Scale



     Irradiation Chamber and its Application to Relative Measurements of



     Hydrocarbon Reactivities," Presented at the 148th National Meeting,



     American Chemical Society, Chicago, 1964.
                                     2-80

-------
40.  Glaaaon, W. A., and Tuesday, C.  S.t  "Hydrocarbon Reactivity in the




     Atmospheric Photo-oxidation of Nitric Oxide," Presented at the 150th



     National Meeting, American Chemical  Society,  1965.



41.  Altshuller, A.  P., "An Evaluation of Techniques for the Determination



     of the Photochemical Reactivity of Organic Emissions,"  APCA,  16:257-260,



     1966.




42.  Altshuller, A.  P., "Reactivity of Organic Substances in Atmospheric



     Photo-oxidation Reactions," U.S. Department of Health, Education,  and



     Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 99-AP-14, Cincinnati,



     Ohio, 1965.



43.  Caplan, J.  D.,  "Smog Chemistry Points the Way to Rational Vehicle



     Emission Control," Presented at International West  Coast Meeting,



     Society of  Automotive Engineers, Vancouver, British Columbia,  1965.
                                     2-81

-------
                                 CHAPTER 3




                    ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS AND METEOROLOGY






                                                                        Page




A.  INTRODUCTION                                                         3-4




B.  CLIMATOLOGY AND AIR MASS BEHAVIOR                                    3-5




    1.  Atmospheric Pressure Systems                                     3-5




    2.  Vertical Stability                                               3-6




C.  TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION                                             3-12




    1.  Diffusion and Diffusion Models                                   3-15




    2.  Vertical Temperature Structure                                   3-17




    3.  Transport                                                        3-21




    4.  Terrain Effects                                                  3-23




D.  TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS                                                  3-25




E.  SOLAR RADIATION                                                      3-32




    1.  Actinic Irradiance                                               3-33




    2.  Effect of Smog on Atmospheric Transmission                       3-34
                                     3-1

-------
                                CHAPTER 3

                             LIST OF FIGURES
                                                                        Page
           Occurrence of Anticyclones Over the Eastern Portion          3-7
           of the United States.

3-2        Mean Mixing Depths for the Western United States.             3-10

3-3        Monthly Mean Afternoon (Open Circles)  and Urban              3-11
           Morning (Solid Circles) Mixing Heights.   All Data
           for 1960-1964, Except  Washington for 1961-1964.

3-4        Example of Streamline  Analysis for Los Angeles Shoving       3-14
           Mesometeorological Scale Eddy.

3-5        Relation of Temperature and Height to Atmospheric             3-19
           Stability.

3-6        Typical Summer Trajectories Across the Los Angeles Basin.    3-26

3-7        Prevailing Surface Wind Patterns for 6 AM and 12 Noon in     3-27
           the Tunuyan Valley, Argentina.

3-8        Method of Constructing Trajectories Using Streamline         3-29
           Maps.

3-9        Variation in Actinic Irradiance with Solar Altitude.         3-36

3-10       Diurnal Variations in Actinic Irradiance.                    3-37

3-11       Attenuation of Direct Solar Energy by Photochemical Smog.    3-38

3-12       Variation in the Attenuation Coefficient of Photochemical    3-39
           Smog with Wavelength.
                                     3-2

-------
                                 CHAPTER 3




                               LIST OF TABLES








Table                                                                    Page




 3-1       Estimated Actinic Irradlance In the Lower Atmosphere.         3-35
                                      3-3

-------
A.  INTRODUCTION



          The possible effects of contaminants in the atmosphere are judged



against a fabric of exposure events defined by intensity (.concentration),



frequency, and length of exposure.  Man controls these events only indirectly



through activities leading to the introduction of "contaminants to the




atmosphere; once Introduced, the fate of these contaminants is controlled by



physical and chemical processes present in the environment.



          The development of plans to achieve desired air quality goals



requires the prediction of contaminant patterns expected as the result of




possible abatement actions.  This implies at least a crude understanding of



the atmospheric processes acting on air contaminants.  As this understanding is



refined, It is expected that greater use of predictive air quality simulation



models will be made.  One such model and its application to photochemical air



contamination is discussed in Chapter 6 of this document.



          This chapter treats those atmospheric processes that arc particularly




important in relating the emissions of contaminants from sources to the resultant



spatial and temporal distribution and concentrations of the contaminants.   It



is intended primarily for the nonmeteorologist who is concerned with the



development of abatement strategies.  As such, it deals primarily with transport



and mixing processes controlled by both large-scale weather features and more



localized or mesometeorological factors.  The transmission of solar energy




leading to the initiation of photochemical reactions is also discussed.
                                      3-4

-------
B.  CLIMATOLOGY AND AIR MASS BEHAVIOR




          The state of the atmosphere provides a primary influence on the con-




centration of air pollutants by prescribing the volume of air with which con-




taminants can mix during and after emission.  When the sources of contaminants




are extensive, i.e., a typical urban area, the initial dilution depends




primarily on wind speed.  After emission the dilution continues as the polluted




volume increases in size due to mixing and stirring motions at its lateral




and upper boundaries.  Increase in volume depth by vertical diffusion at the




upper boundary depends upon the atmospheric stability at that level.  Horizontal




diffusion at the lateral and upper boundaries depends upon turbulent eddy




motions in the horizontal air flow, which in turn are a function of teoain,




wind speed, stability, and sky cover.




          Large-scale weather features, such as high and low pressure areas




that influence horizontal and vertical motion of the atmosphere, can usually




be recognized on conventional weather maps and charts.  The pattern of occurrence




of these features over a long period of time forms a record that is generally




referred to as the climatology of an area.  Predictions based upon these past




records are valid only in a statistical or probabilistic sense.  The most




important of these large-scale weather features are treated in this section.




    1.  Atmospheric Pressure Systems




          The strength of the wind depends on the horizontal gradient of




atmospheric pressure.  Areas with large horizontal pressure gradients are paslly




recognized on conventional weather maps as the place where the isobars are spaced




clone together.  They are the site of the windy areas.  The pressure gradient






                                      3-5

-------
decreases near the centers of high- and low-presssr« areas, becoming essentially




zero at the centers.  Here the wind is weakest, often calm,  Centers of




high-pressure areas (anticyclones) and low-pressure areas (cyclones) are places



where dilution due to horizontal air motion is minimized.  Conversely, in



zones of closely packed isobars (strong horizontal pressure gradients) between



the centers of cyclones and anticyclones, this type of dilution Is maximized.



          Host cyclones and anticyclones migrate across the United States (roughly



from west to east).  As a result, the strength of the wind at any one location



usually varies from day to day, with consequent variation in the dilution of air



contaminants.  Sometimes, however, a pressure system becomes almost stationary




(stagnates) for a period of some days.  In this Instance the area near the



center is subject to very little horizontal air motion for a protracted period



and pollution produced there tends to accumulate.  Although this is not the




case with cyclonic systems (as discussed below), it is particularly important



with respect to anticyclones, which are associated with reduced vertical



motion.




          Korschover  has prepared a climatology of the occurrence of such



anticyclones over the United States east of the Rockies.  His results,



shown in Figure 3-1, detail the sites where anticyclones tend to stall,



making those sites subject to weak winds.  Substantial variation is indicated,



but no area can be considered truly Immune from poor dispersion conditions.



    2.  Vertical Stability



          The upper limit to the spread of pollution is determined by the




vertical stability of the atmosphere.  A stable layer of air is one which
                                      3-6

-------
                      -        -   •   •   •
    I    .^f.   \   •  ••   ^**  '  T   S
   ~L~  •  -- •  --•   ^-—N**•"

Figure 3-1.  OCCURRENCE OF ANTICYCLONES OVER THE
            EASTERN PORTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
                       3-7

-------
resists stirring and mixing motions in vertical directions.  This characteristic




of the atmosphere is determined by its vertical temperature structure.  When




temperature increases with height through a layer of the atmosphere (temperature




inversion), the layer is very stable.  Typically, temperature decreases with




height at a rate of about 3* F per 1000 feet.  In these circumstances it is




only slightly stable;  the greater the decrease in temperature, the less




stable the layer.  Pollutants mix rapidly upward when this vertical temperature




gradient exceeds 5.4° F per 1000 feet (dry adiabatic rate at cooling).  Vertical




diffusion, on the other hand, practically halts in the presence of a temperature




Inversion.




          Temperature inversions are not rare and may occur almost anywhere.




Nocturnal inversions form over land at ground level on clear calm nights, the




air being chilled by contact with the cold ground.  Provided the wind is not




too strong, they also form when warm air Is moved in over a colder surface  (warm




sea to cold land, for example).  Or they can fora at or above the surface whtn




a layer of air subsides.  The inversion-forming processes are discussed in



detail in the following section.




          Daytime heating of the ground and the layer of air next to it




destroys ground  Inversions.  For this reason the nocturnal ground Inversion




seldom survives  the first hour or so of sunlight and normally does not possess




the longevity to allow aerious pollution accumulation.  Advection (horizontal




transport) of a  low Inversion layer from i. cold surface to a warm surface also




can eliminate an inversion.  This happens (but usually too late  to prevent  build  up




of contaminants) when air moves  from  the Pacific across the Los  Angeles  coastal plain







                                      3-8

-------
to the interior deserts.  One further mechanism that can destroy an inversion



in an atmospheric layer is the vertical stretching (deepening by being squeezed



horizontally) of the layer.  This type of motion is typical in the lowest



layers of a cyclone and explains why air pollution episodes are rare at the



center of cyclones despite relatively sluggish air motion.



          Daytime heating by increasing the temperature of the layer of air



next to the ground erodes inversion layers from below, sometimes completely



destroying them.  During this process the lowest layer of the atmosphere,



through which ground-produced air pollution is allowed to mix, becomes



deeper and deeper.   This depth, called the mixing depth (frequently referred



to as mixing height), reaches a maximum about the time maximum air temperature



is reached at ground level (usually sometime in the afternoon).  Since this



depth is a measure of the maxLmum vertical pollution mix during the entire


                                                                      2 3
day, it is a variable directly related to maximum dilution.  Holzworth '



has developed statisticl for maximum mixing depth over most of the United



States.  Figure 3-2 shows the mean mixing depths over the Western United



States for four different months using a contour Interval map.  Month



by mean morning and afternoon mixing heights for four widely separated


                              4

cities are shown in Figure 3-3 .  The wide seasonal, geographical, and



daily variations in this parameter are evident from these figures.
                                      3-9

-------
                                                rr-rr
Figure 3-2a.  January mean maximum
mixing depths In hundreds of meters
ebovc the surface, computed from
ncnn radiosonde observations '
(1946-1955) and uean naxinura surface
temperatures (1921-1950).  Contour
interval ZOOn.
Figure 3-2b.  Same as Figure 3-2a,
but  for April.  Contour Interval
400m.
Flfuro 3-2*.  S«mc as Figure 3-2a,
but  for July.  Contour interval 400u.
         Figure 3-2.  MEAN MOXNB DEPTHS
      3-2d.  Same as Figure 3-2«,
but  for October.  Contour  interval
FOR THB UKStZKB uTTITID STATES.
                                    3-10

-------
              i—r--:—i	:—r  'I
                     '\.
         ~r"
         0»T|N«XM  ^ /  >
         • uamim    •  '^'   i
        \       f MNVII eoio. \
Figure 3-3.  MONTHLY MEAN AFTERNOON (OPEN
             CIRCLES) AND URBAN MORNING
              (SOLID CIRCLES) MIXING HEIGHTS.
             ALL DATA FOR 1960-1964, EXCEPT
             WASHINGTON FOR 1961-1964.
                  3-11

-------
C.  TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION



          Within the limits imposed by the large-scale features of the atmosphere,



the transport and dispersion of air contaminants depends greatly upon the more



localized and detailed structure and motion of the layer of air Involved.  As



a cloud of pollution moves it mixes with its atmospheric environment.  Two



types of mixing or diffusion take place simultaneously:  molecular diffusion



and eddy diffusion.  However, the rate of transfer of material across the cloud



boundary by Individual molecular motions is negligible compared with that



generated by eddy motions.








The eddying motion of the atmosphere encompasses a wide range of eddy sizes,



from the small wisp traced by the smoke from a cigarette to the considerably



larger whirls, cyclones and anticyclones that may be a thousand miles in



diameter.  The diffusion rates stemming from these widely disparate scales




are themselves grossly different, with values that range over more than



ten orders of magnitude when computed for the whole spectrum of motions in the



atmosphere.  As a consequence, clouds of pollutants that are injected into the



atmosphere are observed to disperse and diffuse at rates that increase markedly



as the clouds themselves increase in size.  This is because the scale of mixing



motions  that can exist completely Interior to clouds naturally increases as



the clouds become larger.




          Thus, atmospheric motions on a scale that is small cc?pered  .,  .he




cloud actively mix the cloud with its environment (diffusion).  Motions on a



scale large compared to the cloud bodily move the entire cloud (transport),
                                      3-12

-------
and motions on a scale comparable to the cloud merely change its shape




(deformation).  A cloud may thus pass through a long history from small, simple,




concentrated volume to very large, complicated and dilute volume.  These




transformations are accompanied by a continuing enhancement of the dilution




mechanism as each larger and more effective scale of eddy leaves the ranks




of the transporting motions and joins those actively diffusing—and therefore




expanding—the cloud.




          Tn the case of a continuous source of contamination, this process




produces an ever-widening plume of pollution moving off downwind in ever-larger




meanders.  The plume becomes too dilute to detect visually long before eddying




motions large enough to be represented on current weather maps become active




diffusers of the plume.




          On the usual weather map, data points are separated by 50 to




100 miles.  A very dense mesometeorological network of wind-reporting stations




13 required to represent just the initial transporting and deforming flow




patterns of the polluted air mass from a large city.  Streamline analyses




of such data sometimes delineate eddies and whirls 10 or 15 miles in diameter,




such as the one in Los Angeles illustrated in Figure 3-4.  Most of the eddies




responsible for dilution are smaller than this, affect only one station at a




time, and so go completely undescribed even on the mesometeorological streamline




map.  They are detectable, however, in another type of wind record:  the con-




tinuous wind speed and direction traces of the individual anemometer and wind




vane.  These traces show the apparently random fluctuations of the wind at a
                                      3-13

-------
Figure 3-4.  EXAMPLE OF STREAMLINE ANALYSIS FOR
             LOS ANGELES SHOWING MESOMETEOROLOGICAL
             SCALE EDDY.
                     3-14

-------
single station as the atmosphere's wide spectrum of eddies drift by.   Statistical




descriptions of this turbulent flow (e.g., standard deviation of wind direction




fluctuations) are used by the practitioner in estimating diffusion rates.




    !•  Diffusion and Diffusion Models




          Substantial efforts are under way to produce useful atmospheric




simulation models for predicting effects of various abatement strategies on




air quality.  The more advanced models take into account both point and area




sources, variations in source strength, turbulent diffusion, transport, and




atmospheric reactions.




          The fundamental background of these models lies in diffusion




submodels, essentially all of which are based upon the statistical theory




of turbulent diffusion where a Gaussian distribution of plume spread is




assumed.  Turner  summarizes a great deal of the early work in this field



and provides a useful working manual as well.  The equations used for




illustration here are taken from his work.




          The concentration, x, of a gas or suspended aerosol at a point




represented by the coordinates x, y, z downwind of a continuous point source




of effective elevation, H, is given by the following equation when z - Q




(i.e., ground level concentration):



    x (x,y,o,H) -    q     exp [- 1/2 (--)2J exp [- 1/2
                                                           z
                                     3-15

-------
where  Q  - mass emission rate


       o  - plume standard deviation in horizontal plane


       o  » plume standard deviation in vertical plane
        z

       U  - mean wind speed
A number of assumptions are made in this expression:  (1) there is continuous


emission from the source, so that diffusion in direction of the source can be


neglected; (2) the material is a nonreactive gas or aerosol with negligible


settling rate; (3) the plume content is conserved, i.e., there is total


reflection from the ground.


          Modifications of the general form of this equation have been


derived for estimating seasonal or annual concentrations, area and multiple


source concentrations, maximum downwind concentrations and a variety of other


special applications.


          It is evident from the foregoing that the utility of the diffusion


equation is limited by the ability to obtain accurate estimates of the plume


standard deviations, a  and or .  Some problems may be encountered In obtaining


H, the effective release height, when plume rise must be considered, but


the other parameters are fairly straightforward.  Values of o  and a  vary
                                                             y      *

In a complex way with the vertical temperature structure of the atmosphere,


wind speed, roughness of the earth's surface and distance from the source.


Simplified methods have been developed to estimate these parameters fren


normally available mesometeorological data such as wind speed and vertical

         4
stability .
                                      3-16

-------
    2•  Vertical Temperature Structure




          Whether the prediction of air quality in a given area from defined




sources is accomplished through the use of simulation modeling or by purely




statistical methods such as multivariate analysis, the buoyancy-induced




turbulence related to vertical temperature structure is worthy of additional




discussion.




          If a parcel of air is rising relative to the air around it, one




of two events may be responsible:  The parcel may have encountered an obstacle




and been deflected upward, or it may have become buoyant.  The mixing




motions that result when air moves over uneven terrain are mainly confined




to the layer next to the ground.  Buoyancy effects, on the other hand, are




not confined to the lowest boundary of the atmosphere and are the basic




cause of most vertical mixing throughout the depth of the lower atmosphere.




          A hypothetical layer of air which is isothermal, i.e., has the




same temperature at all heights, can be considered as an example.  A small




parcel of air interior to the layer, lifted 1000 feet through the layer,




would be surrounded by air at the same temperature as its original environment.




However, the temperature of the parcel would have decreased by adiabatic ex-




pansion while moving upward to a position of lower pressure.  If no heat were




gained (or lost) by the parcel in the process, it would have cooled at the dry




adiabatic rate, 5.4° F per 1000 feet (1° C per 1000 meters) by virtue of




expanding against its environment.  Being 5.4° F cooler than its new environment,




it would be negatively buoyant at this position and, if released, would fall
                                     3-17

-------
back to Its original level.  On the other hand, the parcel, through compressional




heating, would become positively buoyant by displacement downward; released




it would rise again, seeking its original level.  We must therefore conclude




that an isothermal layer is stable to the vertical displacements of all parcels




within it.  Vertical mixing motions are opposed by restoring buoyancy forces, and



resulting diffusion rates are small.




          Usually the lowest layer of the atmosphere is not isothermal.  Typically




it is stratified so that the temperature at one level is about 3° F cooler




than it is 1000 feet lower, i.e., it has a "lapse" in temperature of 3° F per




1000 feet.  Above its original level a displaced parcel again is cooler than




its new environment, but this time only by 2.4° F,  Again there is a




restoring force, but It is much smaller; therefore, this layer Is neither as




stable nor as resistant to vertical mixing motions as an isothermal layer.




          In an atmospheric layer whose lapse rate numerically equals the




dry adiabatic rate of cooling, vertical displacements develop no buoyancy




forces at all.  Such an atmospheric layer has neutral stability.  Since the



vertical motions are unopposed by buoyancy forces, diffusion rates are high.




          In a layer whose lapse rate exceeds the dry adiabatic rate of




cooling (for example, 7° F per 1000 feet), an upward displacement of 1000 feet




results in a parcel 1.6° F warmer than its environment.  In this case there




is no restoring force.  Instead there is a force in the direction of th
-------
and the greater the lapse rate the greater the diffusion,

          To summarize, one property of the atmospheric layer that determines

the rate of atmospheric diffusion within the layer is the vertical termperature

gradient.  This is classified as stable, neutral, or unstable in order of

increasing potential for diffusing pollutants (see Figure 3-5).
                     1  C/lOOm
                 TEMP
                 Figure 3-5.  RELATION OF TEMPERATURE AND
                              HEIGHT TO ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY.
                                      3-19

-------
          Of interest is th* moat stable configuration, the inversion, in




which temperature actually increases with height.  Inversion layers are so



successful at suppressing vertical mixing (have such small diffusion co-



efficients) that in most cases they effectively halt the vertical transfer



of pollution.  A combination of large-scale and local weather conditions




determines when and where inversions are formed.  When these condition either



cool a layer of air from below, heat it from above, or both, they produce an



inversion in the layer.



          For the lowest layer of the atmosphere, cooling froa below is



usually caused by nighttime radiation losses at or near the ground.  These



are most pronounced when the sky is clear (no radiation back to the ground



from the clouds) and when the wind is light (a minimum of mechanical mixing



transferring heat from warm air above to cold air below).  Under such conditions



very marked inversion layers, usually a few hundred feet in depth, develop



at the surface.  Inversions that form in this way are called radiation



Inversions.



          Another way in which air can be cooled from the bottom is by moving



horizontally from a warm lower boundary to a cool one, coastline to a



cool ocean.  Eddy diffusion transports heat from the air to the ocean,



cooling the lowest part of the atmosphere.



          Heating a layer from above invokes less obvious processes.  Only one,



adlabatic compression, is of importance.  It occurs when a layer of the



atmosphere becomes shallower.  For example, If  a volume of air next to the



ground spreads out horizontally, it must at the same time get shallower.  The






                                     3-20

-------
air at the top is heated by compression as it descends, but the air at the




surface remains at the same elevation and is unheated.  This sort of deformation




of air volumes is called subsidence and tends to stabilize the layer;




if carried far enough, it will produce a temperature inversion in the layer.




As mentioned earlier, subsidence is associated with anticyclones:  Air tends




to spiral out away from the centers of these high pressure areas, producing




a divergence of the air flow which is automatically accompanied by sinking




of the air over the anticyclone.  The presence of an anticyclone over the




eastern United States for a protracted period set the stage for the well-known




air pollution disaster at Donora, Pennsylvania in 1948, and the large




semipermanent anticyclone off the coast of California provides Los Angeles




with its persistent summer inversion.




          When the weather situation provides the opposite of the inversion-




producing processes (cooling from above and heating from below), an inversion,




if present, is destroyed.  Cooling aloft occurs when the atmosphere is




stretched in the vertical (the opposite of subsidence).  This is generally the




case in the vicinity of cyclonic storms and accounts, in large part, for the




accompanying comparative lack of low inversions.  Heating from below as the




hot ground passes heat to the air is a regular daytime occurrence over land




in the absence of clouds, and accounts for the rapid weakening—if not complete




destruction—of low inversions during the day.




    3.  Transport




          Horizontal air motions also play an important role in the dilution




and transport of atmospheric contaminants.  For example, in a large metropolitan
                                     3-21

-------
area on a day when a low, strong inversion exists, the inversion may be so



stable that it effectively damps out all vertical mixing motion at its level.



Although vigorous mixing motions may exist in the less stable—perhaps even



unstable—layer between it and the ground, the Inversion imposes an upper




limit on this eddy diffusion.  Pollution introduced at the ground becomes



diluted with the subinversion air, but the absence of vertical mixing motions



in the inversion layer itself prevents any further penetration of the



contaminants in the vertical.



          In the absence of any horizontal motion, the urban environment



would constitute a large area source continually pouring pollution into a



fixed volume delineated by the periphery of the source area and the depth of



the subinversion layer. As long as conditions remained unchanged, pollutant



concentrations would continue to mount in this fixed volume of air.  The



obvious and most important effect of horizontal air movement is to bring new,



unpolluted air over the source area and at the same time remove an equal



volume of polluted air on the downwind side.  Any such net transport of air



across the source area puts an end to the unlimited increase in pollutant



concentration in the cloud. For any given wind speed and time interval there



is a prescribed volume of air into which the area source can inject con-



taminants; an increase in wind speed Increases that volume and reduces the



pollutant concentration.



          For a large city these  considerations yield a rather simple picture



for the most important pollution  situation for photochemical smog:  the day with




the low, strong temperature Inversion.  The cloud of pollution produced by
                                     3-22

-------
the multitude of individual sources—some fixed, some moving, some continuous,




others intermittent—is one fairly continuous pall over the city, stretching




out downwind of it with a sharply defined upper boundary.  A knowledge of the




mean wind speed, the height of the base of the inversion layer, the diameter




of the source area and the pollutant emission rate would permit a first appro-




ximation of the mean concentration of contaminants in the cloud, providing




that chemical or mechanical removal of the contaminants remained negligible




and the terrain was suitably flat.  The local terrain, however, typically




impresses important diurnal fluctuations on air motions and a variety cf




other constratints that complicate the horizontal and vertical flow field.




These can lead to important distortions of the simple picture above.




    4.  Terrain Effects




          The most obvious effect of terrain on horizontal air motions is




to direct and channel the air flow, much as mountain ranges prescribe the




course of rivers.  Although this analogy is far from perfect, its applicability




depends on the stability or instability of the atmospheric layer in question.




!f the layer of air covering the terrain has an unstable lapse rate, air




encountering a mountain will more readily move up and over the obstacle than




deviate from its course horizontally, since vertical displacements aid positive




buoyancy forces.  On the other hand, air within a stable layer develops




opposing buoyancy forces when displaced vertically, and does behave very much




likr a river in mountainous terrain.




          ft. is popular to ascribe the accumulation of smog in the Lo.s




Anj/eLes Basin to this effect:  "the damming or trapping of the smog by the







                                     3-23

-------
encircling mountain ranges."  But this cliche" resembles reality only part



of the time:  during the hours of darkness, cooling takes place from below,



creating stability and thus enhancing the channeling effects of major terrain




features.



          In the daytime, however, the layer of air next to the mountain is



heated from below, becomes unstable, and moves upslope along with any




entrained air contaminants.  Far from being a dam, the slopes become a vent



for the polluted lower layer during the day.



          Terrain also plays a part in determining the rate at which fresh



air is brought in over the source.  Winds typically are not constant but have



a diurnal fluctuation—a cyclic variation geared to the coming and going



of the sun and instigated by differences in heating and cooling of various



terrain surfaces.  Undoubtedly the largest disparity in terrain as regards



temperature variations is a coastline.  Temperature contrasts across a



coastline during a clear day set in motion a large convection regime that



at ground level produces a sea-breese (wind directed from sea toward




land); at night the temperature gradient is reversed, resulting in a land-breeze



in the opposite direction.



          Normally this fluctuating wind is superimposed on the large-scale



flow provided by pressure patterns seen on conventional weather maps.  The



result is an oscillatory perturbation of this general flow.  In Los Angeles



in summer, for instance, the general flow is from sea toward 1: .d.  Du^-ug



the day the sea-breeze enhances this flow and at night the land-breeze



opposes it.  The result is on-shore movement of around 10 mph during the warn
                                     3-24

-------
parts of the day and very nearly calm or very weak land-breeze at night.


Figure 3-6 shows the halting paths taken by two arbitrarily chosen parcels of


air as they moved across the Los Angeles Basin, illustrating that the afternoon

 ,  •    '.

provides hours of good ventilation but the early morning is a period of near
                                                                 *

stagnation.  Under such conditions the source area should-produce a more
                                                                 4t

dilute polluted wake in the afternoon under the benevolent influehce of the


sea-breeze than it does in the early morning hours, when virtually no new


air is brought in over the source area.  This should cause an accumulation


of  contaminants that stops only with the midmorning onset of the sea-breeze.


          Diurnal variation in ventilation can also occur in the absence of


coastlines as, for example, in valley-mountain regimes.  The thermal contrast


producing these winds is that between the alternately heated and cooled slopes


of  mountains and the air at the same level out over (and well above) the


valley floor—air, out of contact with the ground, that is scarcely heated


or  cooled at all.  Figure 3-7 illustrates these daytime up-valley and up-slope


flows and nighttime down-valley and down-slope winds for a valley in western


Argentina.  In those important instances where the large-scale pressure


patterns prescribe weak flow, these diurnal wind fluctuations provide whatever


horizontal ventilation an area receives.


D.   TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS


          The horizontal movement of air provides more than a dilution volume


for air contaminants:  it defines the path, or trajectory, of a diffusing air


parcel according to the large-scale mean wind field.  In the dynamic sense


che continuing summation, over all sources, of the contaminant loadings
                                     3-25

-------
  ^^%^r--
  r^.^c£*vQ>-  «-*?
  &&«' jWy*.... ^V>-; .:• .:.  rf
IPir^¥(^V^'  «-*?     "V                   1,,
•EM-<'•. S -4/« -., ^V^u ^* <-w   ,_         •    -4,
Effife' ;;k  • :\.   \SfcsC.-.-5 ^ ^ttr^  ^—-^       ^f-
P^-^A9^..~J> /^L.v-'sV^ ' ^r>^  «-^>.'-^     ^    rfe
U.^-^-AS/.,   |'C^-^"- ^,. ' ^---?/--1   x     -vK   ,?|N

te^lSff f^^f ^x-' ••- "I ^- *
J^^LV vv/^v 8v;fSr v-^>^\  %:j-f-.---  i-r^  ^\ l)  ^r^*  _^-,f^-- ^x  x''->^'%c^iiirwr^V^  -TV -wc..\ ••r-^^-:Avt- ;  i
 i  ^ ^^w ^

 ^*vv,  TPi^.

 ^-Vv -WVtf
 > _-^'  ;fv,-
	%-•' .-il^
 ^.w.^v^s .a s
  ,'i:-^-'v. \^_a^-co\
ib >'-  j? 5»*aJe>*yV' '
Vii, ..  ^' c3vw^v'^\
          v :'*»v
         ^   ^ *****N*Li'*ir  "> i'._-»" " '^ "•'* *.'—"« <
          - XJL- r*\ ^-^^^y^--'-1 "-

         tfil@ftS
           ••^N2°
           ,. vj -T^"*"!"*.
   :-t o
   '^x
       4v;
          1 
-------

Figure 3-7.  PREVAILING SURFACE WIND PATTERNS FOR 6 AM
             AND 12 NOON IN THE TUNUYAN VALLEY, ARGENTINA.
                           3-27

-------
resulting from diffusion and large-scale transport of emissions sets the
air quality for a region having well-defined boundaries.  Even here we neglect
losses due to reaction or escape from the system.
          To account for the large-scale movement of air parcels some effort
has been devoted to methods of trajectory construction from readily available
wind speed and direction data.  Both manual and computer-based techniq>*es
have been used.  In practice, manual trajectory construction involves the
analysis of air flow over the area of interest by means of a series of
maps, each one representing the wind pattern at a specific time.  Streamlines
of wind flow (lines everywhere parallel to the wind direction) are developed
on the basis of the wind direction plotted at each observational station
location .  Wind speeds are also plotted.  In most cases, hourly maps
are constructed.  The trajectory is developed by moving the point representing
a simulated air parcel in the direction of the wind at the speed indicated
by the streamline map .  This process is carried on over a series of maps,
so that each hourly wind pattern makes its contribution to the path of the
parcel, as would be the case  if the parcel were actually a part of the air
mass under study.  Figure 3-8 shows how this method is performed.
          The process of trajectory construction can be carried on both
forward and backward in time.  That is, air leaving a specific point  is
tracked forward in time as  it moves from source to receptor, or, starting at
a point of reception, the prior history cf a parcel of  air is determined by
going backward in time via  the appropriate series of wind streamline
maps.  The example in Figure  3-8 demonstrates the first case, where air
                                      3-28

-------
 leaving  a  specific point  is  tracked  as  it moves with  the wind, until  it  is

 carried  out of  the area under study.
Figure 3-8a. T + 1                       Figure 3-8b.  T + 2
Path of air parcel due to air movement   Path of air parcel due to movement
at time T + 1.                           at time T + 2.
                                         Figure 3-8d.  Resulting trajectory,
                                         carried over a series of time steps,
Figure 3-8c.  Trajectory movement,
average conditions, T + 1 and T + 2.
Location of parcel at point 2 is due to
graphical averaging of movement due to
wind-flow maps covering time period
T + 1 to T + 2.
   Figure 3-8.  METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING TRAJECTORIES USING STREAMLINE MAPS.
                                      3-29

-------
          A reasonably dense wind station network is required for construction



of air parcel trajectories using the analysis techniques described.  Approximately



seventy stations are shown in the 60- x 60-mile grid system used by


                8
Davidson, et al.  in the New York City area, while about fifty stations

                                   Q

are used by the Los Angeles Network' in an area of about 1500 square miles.



          Questions regarding the accuracy of trajectories obtained through



streamline map techniques have been raised from time to time.  For example,



how representative of the movement of air parcels is the surface wind?



Inasmuch as parcels are also being moved in the vertical, the net movement



may well be the result of winds aloft rather than just those at the surface.



          Studies to verify trajectories have generally taken two forms.



The first measures the wind variation with height, to determine how much



difference exists in wind flows within the lower atmosphere's mixed layer.



If such winds do not vary greatly, the use of surface winds can be justified.



Such was the conclusion of a vertical wind study   in the Los Angeles Basin.



Tail-method pilot-balloon observations were used to determine the winds



aloft in these studies.



          The second method involves inserting tracer material into the air



and,  through a network of sampling stations, determining its location at  a



future time.  This technique, widely employed to analyze the diffusive



character of an air mass, obviously also provides information about the actual



trajectory of the tagged  air parcels  .



          Currently,  fluorescent dusts are most often used  for relatively



short-distance  tracing.   A mineral powder,  usually a zinc-cadmium  sulfide, is
                                      3-30

-------
dispersed so as to produce an aerosol cloud.  The finely divided material Is




carried with the wind, and thus fulfills the requirement of an air tracer.




Detection is accomplished by use of an ultraviolet light source shining on the




sampling surface.  The tracer material, of known fluorescent properties, can



                                                 12
be identified even in the presence of other dusts  .   Another tracer system




using sulfur hexafluoride has been developed by the National Center for Air




Pollution Control  .   This method shows favorable results as compared with




the fluorescent particle technique.  It is especially recommended for tracing




air movement over longer distances, since good results have been achieved




in the range of 100 miles or more from the release point.




          Another form of an air tracer is the airborne balloon.  So-called




"no lift" balloons may be released and their positions tracked visually or by




radar through use of reflecting surfaces attached to the balloons.  An




assumption is made that these balloons have no excess buoyancy, and therefore




respond only to the motions imparted by the air mass in which they are



        14
released




          A variation of the balloon trajectory technique involves the use




of nonexpandable balloons, inflated with helium so that they will float at



a preselected density level.  Because of their characteristic tetrahedronal




shape these balloons are known as "tetroons," and have been used to determine




trajectories at various locations -)>-LO>-1-'_




          No matter how obtained, any trajectory represents only the path




taken by one parcel initially positioned at a specific time and place.  ThcTe




is no assurance that another trajectory starting at the same place but at






                                      3-31

-------
another time would be similar.   Therefore,  to make any judgment as to the


frequency of occurrence of air parcel movement of a particular nature, it is


necessary to replicate the trajectory-determining process many times.


          The product of this process is a climatology of air parcel movements.


The most frequent path may be thought of as the most frequent or "prevailing"


trajectory, analogous to the concept of "prevailing" wind.  To predict the


most probable path air pollution will take in going from source to receptor,


it is necessary to have sufficient trajectory determinations on which to


base a statistical judgment.  Computer-derived trajectories make it convenient

                                                                     9
to obtain such information in volume, as has been done in Los Angeles .


The single air pollution episode, however, requires only information related


to the actual cime of occurrence; in this situation, the single trajectory


is sufficient to relate source to receptor.


E.  SOLAR RADIATION


          A major element in the study of photochemical air pollution is the


effect of solar radiation on the initiation of photochemical reactions.  These

                   •
reactions are discussed in Chapter A of this document.


          That region of the solar spectrum important in the primary energy-


absorbing processes  (i.e., 3000 to 4000A) varies regularly in Intensity at


the earth's surface  according to season and time of day.  It also varies


with latitude and presence of attenuating species in the atmosphere.  Information


on this atmospheric  factor is needed for any complete ambient photochemical


air pollution study.
                                      3-32

-------
    1 •   Actinic Irradi ance




          The light available in urban atmospheres for the promotion of




photochemical reactions includes, but is not limited to, the light transmitted




directly from the sun.  An appreciable proportion of the light scattered out




of the. direct beam of sunlight still reaches the surface of the earth, and




this accounts for the brightness of the sky.  Under some conditions, such




light from the sky may exceed that direct from the sun.  Since scattering is




quantitatively more important for the shorter wavelengths, its effects on the




photochemical smog reaction system cannot be neglected.




          Actinic irradiance can be defined as the photon flux through a




horizontal unit surface.  In a weakly absorbing medium (such as a polluted




urban atmosphere), the rate of absorption for light of any wavelength is pro-




p, r'-'onal to the concentration of the absorbing material and to the actinic




irradvance for that wavelength.   A useful estimate of actinic irradiance in



                                                         18
terms of the factors discussed above is given by Leighton
where
          I  = incident radiation intensity at the top of the atmosphi-re
           oX


          Ta,\= transmissivi ty (fraction transmitted) directly through absorbing layer




          T  = transraissivity due to combined scattering and diffusion
           sX


         g,i a semiempirical parameters representing particular aspects of the




               geometry of the scattered light




          z  = solar zenith angle
                                      3-33

-------
          Table 3-1 shows values of J, calculated by this equation, for



100A (10 ran) wavelength bands through the ultraviolet and visible regions




of sunlight, for a series of values of z.  Figure 3-9 displays values of J



for several wavelengths as a function of solar altitude, while Figure 3-10



shows the diurnal variation of J-^7nn as estimated for various latitudes at



the summer and winter solstices.  Within the latitudes of the contiguous



forty-eight states, as Figure 3-10 shows, there is little variation with




respect to either the maximum actinic irradiance (at 3700A) or the integrated



24-hour value at the summer solstice.  However, at the winter solstice,



the effect of latitude on these parameters is quite great.  At other times



of the year, of course, the latitude effect is intermediate, with the



greatest variation between summer and winter at the higher latitudes.  For



reference purposes, the three latitudes shown are approximately those of



London, Los Angeles, and Mexico City.



    2.  Effect of Smog on Atmospheric Transmission


                                21
          Measurements by Stair   , taken during a severe episode of smog in



Pasadena, California, showed clearly that transmission of the direct solar



beam was sharply reduced at wavelengths approaching 3000A.  This effect


                                                           18
is illustrated by Figures 3-11  and 3-12, both from Leighton   .  The



effect at wavelengths between 3200 and 5000A was well represented by the



empirical equation



                       S  =• 0.133\~lt5
                        PX
where
                       S  = attenuation coefficient of the polluted layer

                        r A
                                     3-34

-------
            Table 3-1.   ESTIMATED  ACTINIC IRRADIANCE
                            IN THE LOWER ATMOSPHERE.
X(A)
2000
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3000
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4000
4700
4800
, 4900
6000
6250
6500
6750
0000
6250
0500
0750
7000
7500
8000
<
0°
0.0014
0.12
0.05
1.17
1.83
1.88
2.00
2.10
2.4S
2.30
2.20
3.10
4.01
4.00
3.80
4.50
6.00
6.00
5.13
6.20
4.88
• 4.95
5.14
5.30
6.32
6.32
5.27
6.22
5.10
5.05
4. SO
4.55
/» X 10-", photons
20'
0.0009
0.10
0.00
1.10
1.75
1.82
1.98
2.02
2.40
2.28
2.13
3.01
3.00
3.95
3.70
4.39
4.88
4.89
5.02
6.11
4.78
4.85
5.05
6.21
6.23
6.24
5.19
5.10
5.10
6.00
4.75
4.51
(cm'1 sec"1
40*
0.0002
0.05
0.43
0.91
1.48
l'.W
1.72
1.77
2.11
2.02
1.90
2.70
3.61
3.57
3.42
4.02
4.48
4.50
4.04
4.72
4.44
4.51
4.73
4.90
4.92
4.95
4.94
4.92
4.89
4.82
4.59
4.37
100 A"') at « -
60°
—
0.01
0.13
0.53
0.90
1.05
1.18
1.24
1.50
1.46
1.38
2.00
2.03
2.71
2.02
3.11
3.61
3.56
3.08
3.79
3.59
3.08
3.91
4.09
4.14
4.21
4.25
4.30
4.32
4.29
4.10
3.98

80"
—
__
0.01
0.10
0.20
0.32
0.36
0.38
0.40
0.44
0.42
0.02
0.82
0.80
0.85
1.03
1.19
1.22
1.30
1.38
1.33
1.40
1.50
1.09
1.75
1.80
2.01
2.10
2.29
2.38
2.47
2.47
  • Yfcluri HIVI-D *rc from rrj-lation (11-37), vith I-\ f;otn T»Me 1, T*v from Table 4, and T*i from equa-
tion 01-13). rtxtmetrrc rni| foycd ire P - 1000 tab. w - 2. d - 1; (O») -2V moi. 9 » 0-5. and • - 2.
                                   3-35

-------
 9.0
ft.O
                 30             60
                 Sffar Alliludf, 90-f
•o
 Figure 3-9.   VARIATION IN ACTINIC IKRADIANCE
               WITH SOLAR ALTITUDE.
                        3-36

-------
                 IS
                 1.0
                           I  I   I
                                                 I   I  I  I
                     66769  10  II  12  IZJ4
                           AM    Ttut Solar Tint
                                                    $6
       Figure 3-10.  DIRUNAL VARIATIONS  IN ACTINIC  IRRADIANCE.
NOTE:  Values illustrated are for  the  100A  interval  of  the solar spectrum
       centered at 3700A.  The designations of  the individual curves:   I,
       20° N lat, summer solstice;  II,  35°  N  lat, summer solstice;  III, 50°
       N lat, summer solstice; IV,  20°  N  lat, winter solstice; V, 35°  N 1-jt,
       winter solstice; and VI, 50° N  lat,  winter solstice.
                                      3-37

-------
                       r DIFFUSION WITHIN THE POLMTTED LAYER
              ie
            !
                     e    •
                                10    II     12     I     8
                                All. Pttllle Sltndtrt Timt  P.M.
  Figure 3-11.  ATTENUATION OF DIRECT SOLAR ENERGY BY PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG.
NOTE:  Both lines represent the direct solar energy over  a  10A bandwidth
       centered at  3235 A,  incident on a normal surface at  800 feet elevation.
       The smooth line  is  I .Ts.Ta^, calculated from Table  1 and equations

       (11-9),  (11-11)  and  (11-13) with P-985 mb, w-2, d-0.5, and (Os)-2.  The
       irregular line is the observed energy, from Stair's  data for 0,-.::3bar 18,
       1954 at Pasadena21.
                                      3-38

-------
  38

   1.0
H. SOLAR 1UDUTIO.V .VXD ITS AKSOHPTION
 te
 £06
  0.4
        «


        0
            I
   JOOO     SZOO
                    3500
                                   4000
                                    , A
                                                1500
                                                             5000
Figure  3-12.  VARIATION IN THE ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT
               OF  PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG WITH WAVELENGTH.
                              3-39

-------
                                                                            19
          Similar measurements were made in Los Angeles during October, 1965



with a variety of UV sensors, including a filter phototube, filter



photocell, photochemical sensors, photosensitive plastic, and photochromic



glass.  Overall attenuation from smog in the region of 3000 to 3800 A incidental



radiation was about 14 percent.  Peak attenuation of 58 percent during the



study period occurred during moderate to heavy smog as determined by chemical



pollutant measurements.



          Although the direct radiation from the solar beam may be reduced



at some wavelengths by more than 80 percent as shown in Figure 3-11, the



effect of smog on actinic irradiance is more difficult to estimate.  The



angular distribution of the scattered light is not known, but is likely


                                                           19
to have a substantial effect on estimated values.  Leighton  , however,



studied estimates based on two postulates which were intended to bracket the



probable conditions.  He concluded that for a solar zenith angle less than



60°  (i.e., solar altitude above 30°), the average actinic irradiance in



smog should be greater—by perhaps as much as 25 percent—than that found in



the absence of smog.  Since smog is more likely to be encountered when the



solar zenith angle is low, this conclusion suggests that the generation of



smog aerosols by the photochemical reaction system may further accelerate



the photochemical process by increasing the actinic irradiance within  the



smog layer.


                         20
          Nader and White  , during a comparison study of horizontal



plate and volumetric photovoltair sensors, did find some evidence of a slight



increase in UV radiation in smoggy air as compared to clear air at solar
                                      3-40

-------
zenith anglrrb.   Much more information from field measurements of UV


radiation will be required to enable refined predictions of the effect of

                                                                <*
this parameter on photochemical smog formation.
                                      3-41

-------
                                 REFERENCES






1.   Korshover, J., Synoptic Climatology of  Stagnating Anticyclones,




     U.S. Public Health Service, R.  A.  Taft  Sanitary Engineering Center,




     Tech Report A60-7, Cincinnati,  Ohio, 1960.   (Updated to 1965 by  PHS




     Pamphlet HEW AP-34, 1967).







2.   Holzworth, G.C-, A Study of Air Pollution Potential for the




     Western United States, Journal of Applied Meteorology,  Vol. 1,  No.  3,




     366-382,  1962.






3.   Holzworth, G. C., Mixing Depths, Wind Speeds and Air Pollution Potential




     for Selected Locations in  the United States, Journal of Applied




     Meteorology, Vol. 6, No. 6, Dec. 1967.






4.   Holzworth, G. C., Large-scale Weather Influences on Community Air




     Pollution Potential in the United States, Journal of the Air Pollution




     Control Association, 19, 4, 248-254, 1969.






5.   Turner, D. Bruce, Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates,




     PHS Publ. No. 999-AP-26,  1967.







6.   Saucier, W. J., Principles of Meteorological Analysis, University of




     Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1955.






7,   Petterssen, S., Weather Analysis and Forecasting, McGraw-Hill,




     New York, pages 221-227, 1940.
                                     3-42

-------
 8-   Davidson, B. and C-workers., Final Report on the Urban Air Pollution




      Dynamics Research Project,New York University Report, December, 1969.






 .9.   Taylor, J. R.,  Normalized Air Trajectories and Associated Pollution




      Levels in the Los Angeles Basin, Air Quality Report #45,  Los Angeles




      County Air Pollution Control District, Los Angeles, California, 1962.






10.   Kauper, E.K., Homes, R.  G., Street, A. B., "The Verification of




      Surface Trajectories in the Los Angeles Basin by Means of Upper




      Wind Observations and Tracer Techniques," Technical Paper #14,




      Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District, updated.






11.   Slade, D. H., Ed., "Meteorology and Atomic Energy, 1968," U. S. Atomic




      Energy Commission, pages 293-298, July 1968.






12.   Leighton, P. A., Perkins, W. A., Grinnell, S. W., Webster, F. X.,




      "The Fluorescent Particle Atmospheric Tracer," J. Appl. Meteorol.,  4_,




      (3), 334-348, June 1965.






13-   Niemeyer, L. E., McCormlck, R.A., "Some Results of Multiple-Tracer




      Diffusion Experiments at Cincinnati," J. Air Poll. Control Assoc.,  18,




      (6), June 1968.






14.   Gifford, F. A., Jr., "A Study of Low Level Air Trajectories at




      Oak Ridge, Tennessee," Monthly Weather Rev., 81, (7), 179-92.
                                      3-43

-------
15.  Angell, J..K. ,  "Use of Constant Level Balloone in Meteorology,"




     Advances in Geophysics, Vol.  8, 137-219,  H.  E. Landsburg, J.  Van Meighem,




     Eds., Academic Press, New York., 1961.






16.  Pack, D. H.,  "Air Trajectories and Turbulence Statistics from Weather




     Radar Using Tetroons and Radar Transponders," Monthly Weather Rev. ,




     90, (12): 491-506, 1962.







17.  Pack, D. H., and Angell, J. K., "A Preliminary Study of Air Trajectories




     in the Los Angeles Basin as Derived from Tetroon Flights", Monthly




     Weather Rev.,   9^(10-11):  583-604, 1963.






18.  Leighton, P.  A., Photochemistry of Air Pollution, Academic Press,




     New York, 1961






19.  Nader, J. S.,  "Pilot Study of Ultraviolet Radiation in Los Angeles,




     October 1965" PHS Publ. No. 999-AP-38, 1967.






20.  Nader, J. S.  and White, N., "Volumetric Measurement of Ultraviolet




     Energy in Urban Atmosphere", Env. Sci. , and Tech., 3., 848-854,




     September  1969.






21.  Stair, R., Proceedings  National Air Pollution Symposium, Pasadena,




     California, 1955, pg.  48.
                                      3-44

-------
                                 CHAPTER 4




                           ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS






                                                                         Page




A.  INTRODUCTION                                                         4-8




B.  PRINCIPLES OF PHOTOCHEMICAL PRIMARY REACTIONS                        4-9




    1.  The Initiation of Photochemical Reactions by the Absorption      4-9




        of Solar Radiation.




        a.  Light and Quanta                                             4-9




        b.  The Laws of Photochemistry                                   4-11




        c.  Photochemical Primary Processes for Simple Molecules         4-14




    2.  Molecules that Absorb Light in Urban Atmospheres                 4-18




    3.  Photochemical Primary Processes for Absorbers in Urban           4-25




        Atmospheres.




        a.  Oxygen                                                       4-25




        b.  Ozone                                                        4-26




        c.  Nitrogen Dioxide                                             4-26




        d.  Sulfur Dioxide                                               4-27




        e.  Nitric Acid                                                  4-28




        f.  Alkyl Nitrates                                               4-28




        g.  Alkyl Nitrites                                               4-29




        h.  Nitroalkanes                                                 4-29




        i.  Aldehydes                                                    4-30




        j.  Ketones                                                      4-30
                                    4-1

-------
                                                                         Page




        k.  Peroxides                                                    4-30




        1.  Acyl Nitrites,  Nitrates,  and Peroxynitrates                  4-31




        m.  Particulate Matter                                           4-31




C.  ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS                                                4-31




    1.  Kinetics of Thermal and Free Radical Reactions                   4-31




        a.  Rate Laws                                                    4-32




        b.  Collision Theory                                             4-35




    2.  Thermal Reactions                                                4-38




    3.  The Generation of Free Radicals                                  4-40




    4.  General Treatment of Radical Chain Reactions                     4-42




    5.  Free Radical Reaction Types in Photochemical Smog                4-45




D.  A THESAURUS OF PROPOSED REACTIONS IN THE URBAN PHOTOCHEMICAL         4-48




    SYSTEM.




    1.  Inorganic Reactions                                              4-48




    2.  Reactions of Atomic Oxygen and Hydrocarbons                      4-53




    3.  Reactions of Ozone and Hydrocarbons                              4-59




    4.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and Molecular Oxygen             4-63




        or Ozone.




    5.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and NO                           4-69




    6.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and NO,,                          4-73




    7.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and Hydrocarbons                 4~?6




    8.  Reactions Between Free Radicals                                  4-80
                                     4-2

-------
                                                                         Paj-e




    9.  Radical Decomposition Reactions                                  4-83




   10.  Summary of Important Reactions of Radicals                       4-86




E.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTION       4-87




    PRODUCTS.




    1.  Ozone                                                            4-87




    2.  Peroxyacyl Nitrates                                              4-87




    3.  Oxides of Nitrogen, NO                                           4-90




    4.  Aldehydes and Ketones                                            4-90




    5.  Carbon Monoxide                                                  4-91




    6.  Nitric Acid                                                      4-91




    7.  Sulfuric Acid                                                    4-91




    8.  Aerosols                                                         4-92




    9.  Epoxides                                                         4-93




   10.  Alkyl Nitrates                                                   4-93




   11.  Alkyl Nitrites                                                   4-93




   12.  Peroxy Compounds                                                 4-93




   13.  Alcohols                                                         4-93




   14.  Ketene                                                           4-93




F.  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CHEMICAL KINETICS                             4-94




    1.  Rationale for Kinetic Simulation                                 4-94




    2.  The Basic Simulation Process                                     4-97
                                     4-3

-------
                                                                     Page
                                                                      - 'I *~*L



3.  Acceptable Simplifications                                       4-100




    a.  Approximate Constancy of Concentration of Components         4-101




        Present in Large Excess.




    b.  Steady State Concentrations for Extremely Short-Lived        4-102




        Species.




    c.  Aggregation of Free Radical Termination Steps                4-104




4.  Photo-oxidation Simulations                                      4-104
                                  4-4

-------
t


*
                                                CHAPTER 4



                                             LIST OF FIGURES






               Figure                                                                   Page




                4-1      Summary of Specific Absorption Rates.                          4-20




                4-2      Absorption Spectrum of SO  (g) at 25° C.                       4-21




                4-3      Absorption Spectrum of NO- at 25° C.                           4-21




                4-4      Molecules A and B in Collision                                 4-J6




                4-5      Time-Dependence of Concentrations in Simulated Photo-          4-108




                         oxidation of Propylene for 40-Step Mechanism, Compared




                         to Experiment.




                4-6      Time-Dependence of Concentrations in Simulated Photo-          4-111




                         oxidation of Isobutene, Compared to Experiment.  From


                                                                73
                         Curves Presented by Westberg and Cohen.
                                                     4-5

-------
                                 CHAPTER 4




                               LIST OF TABLES






Table                                                                    Page




 4-1      Approximate Limits of Spectral Regions                         4-12




 4-2      Some Useful Units and Conversion Factors                       4-13




 4-3      Some Bond Energies of Molecules of Interest in                 4-21




          Photochemical Smog.




 4-4      Species that Absorb Sunlight in the Region 3000A" to 700oA      4-22




 4-5      Species Energetically Possible from 0_ + hv -»•                  4-26




 4-6      Conversion Factors                                             4-33




 4-7      Some Free Radicals and Atoms Required by Photolysis            4-41




 4-8      Free Radical Classes Formed in Irradiated Polluted Air         4-43




 4-9      Inorganic Reactions                                            4-49




 4-10     Rate Constants for Thermal Homogeneous Inorganic Reactions     4-50




 4-11     Rate Constants of Atomic Oxygen-Hydrocarbon Reactions          4-55




 4-12     Rate Constants for Ozone-Hydrocarbon Reactions                 4-60




          (£. mole  sec  ) x 10  .




 4-13     Some Reactions of 0- with Free Radicals                        4-70




 4-14     Some Reactions of NO and N02 with Free Radicals                4-77




 4-15     Some Free Reactions with Free Radicals                         4-84




 4-16     Some Properties of Photochemical Reaction Products             4-88
                                      4-6

-------
Table




 4-17     Illustration of Matrix Method of Formulating Reaction          4-
-------
A.  INTRODUCTION




          Reactions involved in the urban photochemical system fall readily




into two classes:  (1) primary photochemical reactions, in which contaminants,




energized by light, rearrange or decompose to produce excited molecules or




decomposition products; and (2) secondary reactions, in which products of the




primary photochemical reactions react with other molecules, either contaminants




or normal atmospheric constituents.




          Photochemical reactions are initiated by the absorption of light by




molecules.  This interaction changes the configuration of electrons in a




molecule, placing it in an electronically excited state.  The short-lived




excited molecule can lose its excess energy by collision with other molecules




or by spontaneous emissions of energy, thereby returning to its original




ground state.  It may undergo internal rearrangement, may split up into two




or more fragments, or may react with other molecules.  Dissociation and




rearrangement constitute photochemical primary reactions, whereas fluorescence




and collisional deactivation do not lead to further chemical reaction.  Thus,




ordinarily, only a fraction of the light absorbed is effective in promoting




chemical change.



          Products of the primary processes are available to react further by



entering into thermal (i.e., nonphotochemical) interactions with species




with which they collide.  Some important photochemical reactions involve the
                                     4-8

-------
 dissociation of excited molecules into free radicals* or atoms which,

 reacting with the components of polluted air,  are responsible for most of the

 unique characteristics of photochemical smog.

           The secondary chemical reactions in urban atmospheres include

 atom-molecule, radical-molecule, radical-radical, and molecule-molecule

 reactions.  The purpose of this chapter is to describe the processes of

 photochemical excitation and the subsequent types of reactions which it

 initiates.

 B.  PRINCIPLES OF PHOTOCHEMICAL PRIMARY REACTIONS

     !•  The Initiation of Photochemical Reactions by the Absorption of

         Solar Radiation

         a.  Light and Quanta

           Light as a form of electromagnetic radiation is commonly described

 in terms of wave-like properties, especially the wavelength,**

                                     A - £                                     (4-1)

 in which C is the speed of light, 2.9979 x 10   cm/sec., A is its wavelength
 *A radical is a group of atoms forming a coherent structure which may be part
  of various molecules; a free radical is a molecular fragment consisting of
  such a group, unattached to other groups or atoms, and carrying one or more
  unpaired electrons which render it very reactive chemically, as illustrated
  in this chapter.   Free atoms, such as those of oxygen, are also very
  reactive for the same reason.

**The wavelength of a wave is defined as the distance between two successive
  peaks in that wave.
                                      4-9

-------
and v is the frequency of the wave.  However, certain properties of light, such

as the photoelectric effect, require a particle theory.  For the purposes of

photochemistry, both theories are useful.  In describing the absorption of

energy, it is convenient to recognize the particle of light, or photon, as an

irreducible bundle of energy, also called a quantum.  The energy of a quantum

is given by


                                E - hv - ^                                   (4-2)
                                          A

                                                     -27
in which h is Planck's constant, equal to 6.6256 x 10    erg-sec/quantum.

          Light is emitted or absorbed by molecules in a quantum process that

results in the transition of an electron from one quantum state to another.

When light is absorbed, the electron is promoted to a higher energy level and

when light is emitted, the electron falls to a lower energy level.  The

difference in energy between the two states is the same as the energy, hv, of

the quantum (photon).  (In photochemical notation, the term hv is commonly

used in place of a chemical symbol to represent a photon.)

          The energy of interest in photochemical processes is that necessary

to excite molecules and dissociate chemical bonds.  Since most bonds are at

least 40 Kcal/mole or greater in energy, the wavelengths of interest here are
              o
less than 7000A, which corresponds to energies of 40 Kcal/mole or more.
                                                   o         o
Solar radiation at the earth's surface between 3000A and 7000A is in the

range that could excite molecules with sufficient energy to cause photochemical

reactions.  The scientific relation between available chemical energy ana
                                      4-10

-------
wavelength of absorbed light, derived from equation (4-2), is



                              E - 2.86 x 105/X                                (4-3)




where E is in Kcal/mole and X in Angstroms.  Table 4-1 shows the characteris-




tics of various wavelength regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, named




according to common usage.  Some useful energy units, their relationships and




the values of constants referred to in this chapter are given in Table 4-2.




        b.  The Laws of Photochemistry




          Grotthuss (1817) and Draper (1843) stated that "Only the light which




is absorbed by a molecule can be effective in producing photochemical change




in the molecule."  This statement constitutes the first law of photochemistry.




The second law, described by Stark (1908-12) and Einstein (1912-13), states




that each molecule taking part in a photochemical reaction absorbs precisely




one quantum of the radiation which causes the reaction.




          In the light of these laws, a useful concept for quantitative




photochemistry is the quantum yield, which is the ratio between the extent of




a particular reaction or the amount of a particular reaction product observed




and the amount of light absorbed, in terms of molecules per quantum.  Thus the




second law implies that the quantum yield for excitation is unity, since




every absorption event produces an excited molecule.



          As another consequence, the sum of the primary process quantum




yields is unity, since each excited molecule is soon converted either to a




ground state molecule or to photochemical reaction products.  These primary




processes may include dissociation, rearrangement, fluorescence and any other
                                      4-11

-------
















00

2-
u,{
CJJ
i
i*4
J
s
IT-*
8
Oi
CO

EM

C/3
^TJ
s
_1
H^
CQ

2
^
h-4
X
§
PH
%
—**


rH
|








o


^
o
C!


O

rH





<"•%
^
o

X
\^

o
4-1

in
*
CN




vrP
rH
O
rH
^
^^
i-H

O
4-1

m
•^
o



o
o
o


o
4J

0
o
o
en

4J
0)
rH
O
•rl
CO
^4
4J
rH
3

M
id
0)





rH
^

O

i-H



y-^
^>
O
rH

>*•/
m

XI




m

0
rH
X
cn
^j-
•
o

jj
o
rH
a)
XI



o
o
o
A
o
cn

v

o
XI
cd




1

cd
^4
M-i
£j
•H

M
Id
01
>
$

id

'•W
O
CO
4J
CO
01
rl
O

Pi
01
0>
5
4J
0)
XI
01

§
4J
co
iH
0)
X!
4J

CO
cd
•o
0)
C
fl
14H

rH
i-H
3
CO

xT

60
d
0)
rH
0>
>
rt
3


/-%
id



























.
M
01
4J
1
4-1
S
U

CX>
1
0
rH

CO
•^
"


*
01
•
1-*
*£
4J
50
0
01
rH
01

cd

01
X!
4-1

14H
0

rH
cd
U
O
a

u
0)


0)
X!
4J

CO
•H

l>l
•>
0* 0)
i x>

4-1 3
c
d
a) 0)
> >
•r4 ft)
60 S


X^
3



CO
01
rH
3
O
01
^


M
O

ca
e
0
4-1
CO

M-t
o
c
o
•H
4J
Id
4J
•H
1
O)

^4
o
co
c
o
•rl
4J
rt
A
£4
O

CO
c
rl
4-1
rH
cd
O
•H
a>

u

rl
O
14-1

01
rH
•s
rH
•rH
id
>
id

00

tit
c
w


/— 1^
(U
























































J
£
1-1
rH
00
d

^
o
«s
XI
cd




4-12

-------
            Table 4-2.   SOME USEFUL UNITS AND CONVERSION FACTORS.
erg/molecule       e.v
                                                    cm
                                                      -1
                                                                 cal/mole
erg/molecule
                6.242x10
                                         11
5.036xl015     1.439xl016
e.v.
  -1
                         ~12
1.602xlO
1.986xlO~16     1.2396xlO~A
                                                  8.067
               23,060

               2.858
cal/mole
6.949xlO~17     4.338xlO"5
0.3499
               _o
1 erg - 2.39x10   calories.
                                     4-13

-------
processes chat lead to the deactivation or change in the molecule that has

absorbed the quantum of energy.  Whatever the process, only one quantum of

energy has been absorbed by each molecule.  Therefore, the quantum yield for

a primary process can reach a maximum of one if every absorption event results

in that process.  The quantum yield for primary photochemical reaction is less

than one if some of the molecules that are excited are subsequently

deactivated and restored to their original states.

          On the other hand, any values of observed over-all quantum yields

greater than unity indicate the existence of secondary (thermal) reactions.

This means that, following the primary processes, thermal reactions Involving

the products of these processes destroy more of the original molecules.  Thus,

more molecules are lost than quanta of light absorbed.  Detailed examples are

given in the following sections.

          The Beer-Lambert law is also applicable to the systems encountered

in photochemical smog.  The magnitude of the absorption coefficient serves as

an index of the relative amount of absorption to be expected at a given

wavelength of light.  If the absorption coefficient of a given species is
                                o        o
appreciable in  the range of 3000A to 7000A, that species will be an important

absorber of sunlight and, therefore, must be considered in the discussion of

the primary processes in atmospheric photochemistry.  Nonabsorbers, however,

may be important in subsequent thermal reactions.

        c.  Photochemical Primary Processes for Simple Molecules

          The energy possessed by atoms and molecules may be considered  to take

on various forms.  In atoms, the energy can be nuclear or electronic, while in
                                     4-14

-------
molecules consisting of more than one atom the energy can be nuclear, electronic,



rotational or vibrational, corresponding to the various modes of energy



absorption.  Translational or kinetic energy of motion is common to all



molecules.



          The absorption of electromagnetic radiation may excite any of these



modes of activity if the radiation is of the proper wavelength.  Quantum



theory asserts that the energy can be absorbed or emitted only in discrete



packets called quanta.



          Each time a quantum of energy of a given kind of absorbed, an



increment of activity of the appropriate kind is stimulated.  Thus, when


                                               8°
energy corresponding to wavelengths of about 10 A is absorbed, a molecule will


                                                           4°
rotate more energetically.  When energy corresponding to 10 A is absorbed, the



molecule will also vibrate more energetically.  When energy corresponding to


                            3°
wavelengths less than 7 x 10 A is absorbed, an electronic change is induced



in the molecule.  These changes to higher energy take place in single quantum



Jumps and the molecules are said to be raised to higher quantum states or



energy levels.  In the photochemical process, only those absorptions that



cause electronic change lead to photochemical activity.



          A number of excited states are usually available for various values



of the excess electronic energy for a particular type of molecule.  When it is



necessary to differentiate between these states, they are referred to by



quantum mechanical designations known as "term symbols."  For example, the


                                       3                                 1
ground state of the oxygen molecule is   E  , its first excited state is  A ,
                                          o                                o
                                     4-15

-------
                               1 +                                          3
and its second excited state is 2.  The ground state of the oxygen atom is  P,



while the lowest excited state is  D.  Detailed explanations of these terms



can be found in standard texts on quantum chemistry.



          For convenience, less specific indications of electronic excited                   ,-



states are often used; thus, 0~ ( A ) is often referred to simply as "singlet



oxygen" in contrast to the triplet ground state,  Z .  Again, the asterisk is                *



often applied to Indicate an unspecified excited state; for example, 0* might



stand for any of the excited states of molecular oxygen, without discriminating



betwe&n them.



          Processes in which molecules are changed from one electronic state



to another by absorption or emission of energy are called transitions and



often written in a manner analogous to chemical reactions.  Thus



                           02( 2~) + hv -*• 02(1s+)                              (4-4)




represents the transition of oxygen from the ground state to the second



excited state of an oxygen molecule, caused by absorption of a photon.  (Light

                                                                    o        o

appropriate for this transition is in the wavelength range from 6920A to 7660A.)



          A description of all the possible energy states of any given



molecule and of the processes which may give rise to the various transitions



among them constitutes a very complicated exercise in  theoretical photochemistry,



for which the reader is referred to standard texts.  For an approximate



understanding of the photochemistry of urban atmospheres, it is sufficient



to recognize the following general considerations:                                           *
                                     4-16

-------
1.  An electronically excited molecule is produced whenever a

    molecule absorbs a photon.

                    AB + hv •»• AB*                  (excitation)      (4-5)



2.  The lifetime of the excited molecule is short, and can be

    terminated by various processes:  decomposition (4-6), reaction

    (4-7), fluorescence (4-8), collisional deactivation  (4-9).

                   AB* -»• A + B                     (dissociation)    (4-6)

                   AB* + C -»• Products                                (4-7)

                   AB* ->• AB + hv                   (fluorescence)    (4-8)

                   AB* + M -»• AB + M                (collisional      (4-9)
                                                   deactivation)

    Some of these processes lead to disappearance of the original

    molecule and formation of photochemical products, while others

    do not.



3.  Decomposition of the excited molecule is very rare unless the

    quantum energy of the absorbed photon exceeds the bond energy

    of at least one chemical bond in the molecule.



4.  Energy can be transferred from the excited molecule  to another

    molecule with which it collides.  The latter molecule then
                           4-17

-------
              behaves as if it had absorbed light,  while the original
              absorbing molecule is deactivated.   (This process is called
              photosensitization.   It seems to be rather rare in the
              urban atmosphere, but may be responsible for some
              production of singlet oxygen.)


              The processes described in equation (4-5) followed by (4-6) or
              (4-7) constitute possible photochemical primary reaction
              paths, while those described by (4-5) followed by (4-8) or
              (4-9) return the molecule to its original state and do not
              lead to chemical change.
    2.  Molecules that Absorb Light in Urban Atmospheres
          A very large number of compounds absorb some sunlight in the
atmosphere.  However, the absorption will not promote photochemical reactions
if the energy is too low, nor will the reaction be of importance if the
intensity is too low.  The energies necessary to dissociate certain types
of chemical bonds are listed in Table 4-3.  An expression derived from the
Beer-Lambert law is
                               I  = I (l-10~acl)                               (4-10)
                                a    O
where I  is the intensity of Incident light, a is the decadic absorption
       o
                                     4-18

-------
coefficient* of the absorber, c is its concentration, and 1 is the length of

the absorption path.  Since the absorption coefficient is a function of

wavelength, to obtain total absorption values, equation (4-10) must be

applied for all the wavelengths absorbed, and the values of I  summed  (or
                                                             a

integrated) over the range of interest.

          Absorption rates for most of these compounds in urban atmospheres

were estimated and presented by Leighton  as a function of solar zenith

angle (Figure 4-1).  All indications are that nitrogen dioxide is the

dominant absorber in terms of specific rates.

          A summary of the molecules of interest in "smog" with their

absorption coefficient ranges and wavelengths is given in Table 4-4.

          Most of the molecules shown in Table 4-4 absorb light over a very
                             o        o
limited range within the 3000A to 7000A region of the spectrum.  Absorption
                                o
is limited to a region near 3000A where the intensity in sunlight is low

because of absorption in the upper atmosphere.  In addition, most of their

absorption coefficients are quite low.  As a consequence, these molecules are

not considered important as principal absorbers in urban atmospheres.
*The notation used here is that of Leighton.   It is to be noted that some
 authorities2 call this coefficient the "extinction coefficient" and
 denote it by e.
                                      4-19

-------
           I
           I

             0.01 r
                                                                                        f


                                                                                        •«
             OOOll
                       ZO*     40*     60*

                       So/or Ztnith Angli, Z
80*
Figure 4-1.   SUMMARY  OF SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATES.
                            4-20

-------
Table 4-3.  SOME BOND ENERGIES OF MOLECULES
            OF INTEREST IN PHOTOCHEMICAL SMOG.
Molecule
°2
°3
CO
co2
NO
N02
SO,
H20
HO
H02
H2
HCO
RCHO
CH3COCH3
HNO
HONO
HON02
RONO
RONO
RON02
RON00
Bond
0-0
°2-°
c-o
oc-o
N-0
ON-0
OS-0
H-OH
H-0
H-02
H-H
H-CO
R-CHO
CH3C-°-CH3
ON-H
ONO-H
02N-OH
RO-NO
R-ONO
RO-NO
R-ONO 0
Energy Kcal/mole
118.3
25.2-26
257
127
151
72.7
131
119
102
47
104.2
18
80
79
49
78
53
36-40
55-60
36-37
78-79
                   4-21

-------
                Table 4-4.   SPECIES THAT ABSORB SUNLIGHT IN
                            THE REGION 300oX to 7000A.
Substance
Maximum Absorption
Coefficients (liter

mole   cm
                                                     Wavelength of Maximum
                                                     Absorptions within
                                                     Range (Angstroms)
°2
°3
N02
so2

HNO- (HONO,)
•J &
RON02
RONO
RON02

RCHO
RCOR1
ROOR'
0
RCONO
P
RC ONO^
7 x 10"6
110
171
220
121
1.2
0.9
40
8.4
5
16
12
2.3
—

—
6900
3000
4000
3000
3000
3000
3000
3600
3000
3000
3000
3000
3000
— —

—
PAN
      0.5
3000
                                      4-22

-------
          Ozone and sulphur dioxide do have appreciable absorption coefficients
                                                                o
in the range of interest, but their main absorption is near 3000A where

little sunlight energy is available.  Absorption by ozone is of sufficient

energy to dissociate the molecules and some photodissociation should take

place.  However, in the case of SCL, even if absorption does take place,
                  o
the energy at 3000A is not sufficient to cause the molecule to dissociate (the

bond energy of OS-0 is about 131 Kcal/mole).  The absorption spectrum of SO

is shown in Figure 4-2,
                                                                   o        o
          Figure 4-3 shows the absorption spectrum of NO  from 2500A to 5000A.

It can be seen that absorption takes place over the entire range.  In addition,
                                                               o
it has been shown that photodissociation is possible below 4350A.  It is

evident, therefore, that N0_ is the principal absorber of sunlight, and plays

one of the most important roles in the photochemical process that takes place

in the urban air.  Its photodissociation yields free oxygen atoms that react

further with hydrocarbons and other components of polluted air.  As discussed

below, the subsequent molecular and free radical reactions can explain a

great deal of the smog process.

          Although some of the products of photochemical and thermal reactions

may be formed in appreciable quantities, their residual concentrations in the

air may be limited by photodissociation.  This is more likely for those with

large absorption coefficients (Table 4-4), since they would absorb sunlight

more strongly.  N0_ is an example of this type of behavior.
                                      4-23

-------
   0

   2000   2200   2400   2600   2800   3000  3200  3400
Figure 4-2.  ABSORPTION SPECTRUM OF SO,  (g) AT 25° C.
 o
     296
T   148.
 *   74
        2500    3000     3500    4000    4500     5000
 Figure 4-3.  ABSORPTION SPECTRUM OF NO  AT 25° C.
                         4-24

-------
    3.  Photochemical Primary Processes for Absorbers in Urban Atmospheres



        a.  Oxygen
                                                       3 -
          The absorption by ordinary molecular oxygen ( £ ) is in general too

                                                         o
                                                      o         o

weak to lead to dissociation.  Absorption between 6870A and 6920A yields about



41.5 Kcal/mole.  The energy required for dissociation is about 119 Kcal/mole.



Therefore, the direct dissociation of 02 is negligible.  However, oxygen may



be excited by the spin-forbidden process,





                           02 (32J + hv f 0  (VS                           (4-11)
                                 o               o



The excited ( £ ) molecules might react directly with ozone or other species.
               O


          A new photo-oxidation mechanism based on singlet molecular oxygen


                                         4 5
has been proposed by Pitts and coworkers. '   Singlet molecular oxygen has



a theoretical lifetime of only a few seconds, thus the concentrations produced



by direct absorption of sunlight can be expected to be quite small.  This led



Leighton  to conclude in 1961 that the role of 0 * was unimportant.  Pitts,


      4 5
et al. '   pointed out that a high yield of singlet oxygen might be obtained



in a system in which an organic molecule absorbs energy from solar radiation



and then, on collision, transmits it to normal molecular oxygen to produce



singlet excited oxygen.  The overall mechanism is represented as



                             D(S )+hv - D*(S,)
                                o           1


                             D*(S1) -




                  D**(TX) + 02(V) - D(SQ) + 02(    or



(where D represents the "donor" organic molecule).  Subsequent reaction of  0



with olefinic substances produces thermally unstable hydroperoxides which may



be involved in the rapid conversion of NO to N0?.





                                     4-25

-------
        b.   Ozone



          The photolytic processes that are energetically possible  are given



in Table 4-5.



         Table 4-5.   SPECIES ENERGETICALLY POSSIBLE FROM 03 + hv •*-.





         Limiting

         Wavelength                                     Species




           11,400                                   °2(3V * °(3p)





            5,900                                   O.^A ) + 0(3P)
                                                     L   8





            4,600                                   V"^ * °(3p>





            4,100                                   °2<3lg) +





            3,100                                   02(1A ) + O^D)





Most of these processes are spectroscopically forbidden and, therefore, do not



occur at appreciable rates.  However, the 0 atoms and the excited 0» molecules,



to the extent that they are produced, would presumably contribute to secondary



reactions in urban atmospheres.



        c.  Nitrogen Dioxide



          Nitrogen dioxide  is probably the most important absorber.  At


                      0                        7
wavelengths below 4047A, it dissociates readily  by the process,



                                            3

                         N02 + hv -»• NO + 0( P)                                 (4-12)
                                     4-26

-------
The oxygen atoms produced in this reaction are probably  responsible,  directly

or indirectly, for the majority o/ the thermal oxidation reactions  xn urban

pnotochenustry.  The primary process probably involves oirei t  excitation

     2                                 2
from  AI (the ground state for NO-  to  A  for energies  greater  than  the  ON-'
                                                 o
bond energy of 71.8 Kcal/mole.  However, at 4047A  the molecule could  be

               2                                      2
excited to the  B? state and then cross over into  the  A  state  and hence

dissociate according to equation (4-12).

        d.  Sulfur Dioxide

          The energy required for dissociation into SO and  0 is  aboi   i )   Kcal/
                                                 0
mole corresponding to a wavelength of about 2180A.  This energy  is  not

available in urban atmospheres.  Sulfur dioxide may be excited by sunlight  ii.
                  o
trie region of 3200A and lower wavelengths (Figure 4-7).

                              S02 + hv -> SO *                                  (4-1'J)

                                        Q                             _ O
The first excited state may be a triplet  with a lifetime  of i.3 x  LO  to

2.2 x 10~  seconds.  It is estimated that the natural radiative  lifetime

would be about 2 x 10   seconds if the molecule were in  a  singlet state as a
                                           o        o
result of irradiation in the region of 3000A to  3200A.

          The natural lifetime, or mean radiative  lifetime,  of an electronically

excited species is the average time zn seconds that the  excited  species retains

its excess energy in the absence of collisional deactivation.  The mean

lifetime is equal to the inverse of the rate constant for  the  process by

which the molecule loses its energy by radiation (i.e.,  fluorescence,

phosphorescence, etc.).  When a molecule has a relatively  iong lifetime,  say
                                      4-27

-------
> 10   seconds, it Is an indication that it is in an electronic state from

which it is forbidden, spectroscopically, to fall into the ground state b>

radiation.  The triplet state meets these conditions, whereas molecules in

the singlet state may radiate back to ground state readilv and have  lifetimes

shorter than 10"  seconds.  The excited SO * may be able  to react directly
                                          *•
                                             9
with components of smog such as hydrocarbons.

        e.  Nitric Acid

          Although Reynolds and Taylor   observed the format >>n of NO-

corresponding to the reaction in sunlight, the absorption spectrum 01 HNO~
                                                       0
indicates very weak absorption in the region above 3000A.

                      HN03 + hv •*• OH + N02<-53 Real)                           <4-14)

However, Jaffe and Ford   have shown  that  HNO. will  yield N02  in  the presence

of NO- and light.  Since a trace of NO,, will stimulate the reaction,  equation

(4-14) probably results from

                             0 + HN0  + OH + N0                                (4-l'>>
with subsequent formation of NO-,.  The 0 atoms  derive  from the photolysis of

N02 as in equation  (4-12).

        f .  Alkyl Nitrates
                                                  o
          The photolysis of ethyl nitrate  at  3130A  serves  as an example of the

alkyl nitrate primary process.   The most probable photodissociatlon mode is

                                  + hv •*• RCH20  + N02
                                      4-28

-------
                      g.  Alkyl Nitrites

v                       The most generally ac :epted process for RONO is

                                          RONO + hv -v RO 4- NO                                (4-17)

*             Subsequent reactions of the RO radical are probably important in these systems.

              Some results with ter_t-butyl nitrite and tert-pentyl nitrite have given

              quantum yields,  RCHO +NOH ,                            (4-19)
                      h.   Nitroalkanes
                        The only well-established primary process is the formation of  the

              alkyl radical and N02 according to the reaction:

                                           RN02 + hv -»• R + N02                               (4-20)


              For nitromethane  »  »  »   j^ was shown that

                                        CH3N02 + hv -* CH3 + N02                              (4-21)


              was more important than

                                       CH NO  + hv -*- CH20 + NOH                              (4-22)


                                              *22 » 0.04

              For nitroethane, in addition to process (4-20), a second reaction,

                                     CH CH2NO  + hv -»• CH2=CH2 + HONO                         (4-23)

                                              O
              was important.  (^  -0.08 at 3130A.) These data Indicate that nitro compounds
                                                   4-29

-------
first formed in thermal reactions could photolyze further and be  destroyed  so

that no appreciable concentration is found in polluted air.

        i.  Aldehydes

          Photodissociation of aldehydes is only possible energetically  at
                         o
wavelengths of about 3400A and shorter.  The principal dissociation  reaction is

                             RCHO + hv -»• R + HCO                                (4-24)

At shorter wavelengths,

                             RCHO + hv •* RH + CO                                (4-25)
                              o
is possible.  However, at 3130A, 25/4>24 * 0.001 -0.05,  indicating that  the

only reaction for consideration here is  (4-24).  These conclusions have  been

verified  for simple aliphatic aldehydes  such as formaldehyde,  acetaldehyde,

                     2
propionaldehyde, etc.

        j.  Kg cones

          When alkyl ketones are photolyzed,

                              RCOR' +  hv ->• RCO + R'                             (4-26)

                                         -» RR' -I- CO                             (4-27»
       o
at 3130A, equation  (4-26) is favored,  process  (4-27)  increasing at lower

wavelengths.  Therefore,  (4-26) should be  the only  important photodissociation

mode in urban atmospheres.

        k.  Peroxides
                                                             o         o
          Alkyl peroxides absorb weakly in  the  range  of  3000A to 7000A.   The

       2
process   most consistent with observation  Is

                              ROOR' +  hv ->  RO* + R'O*                          (4-28)
                                              o
The  radicals are quite energetic even  at 3130A, where they  carry off about


                                       4-30

-------
56 Kcal/mole.  Subsequent fragmentation of the radicals is to be expected.



        1.  Acyl Nitrites, Nitrates, and Peroxynitrates



          There is no experimental evidence of the primary photochemical



processes that may take place with acyl nitrites, R(CO)ONO, acyl nitrates,



R(CO)ONO- or peroxyacylnitrates, R(CO)OON02.  Leighton1 has speculated on



possible photochemical reactions and the reader is referred to his book for



further possible applications of these compounds to smog.



        m.  Particulate Matter



          Particulate matter such as metal oxides, i.e., ZnO, can absorb light and



give rise to photosensitized surface reactions.  For example, with zinc oxide-



water-sodium formate systems, a reaction produces H~05 with a quantum yield


      16        *
of 0.5   at 3130A.  Since the urban atmospheres contain particles of metallic



oxides such as PbO and Pb_0,, particulate photosensitized reactions might be



of some importance.



          For a more complete discussion of photochemical primary processes the

                                                     2
reader may refer to Calvert and Pitts' excellent text  "Photochemistry," from



which most of the information cited above was obtained.




C.  ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS



    !•  Kinetics of Thermal and Free Radical Reactions



          Reactions that involve products of the primary photochemical processes



(described in paragraph B above) are called secondary reactions.  These include



the interactions of the products of photodissociation with each other and with



any other species in polluted air.   The reactions that result from the collisions
                                     4-31

-------
of various chemical species (not including light) are referred to as thermal




reactions.  These include the interact .ons of normal molecules as well as the




interactions of free radicals with molecules or with themselves.




          In some circumstances, small numbers of free radicals can induce a




very large number of reactions; they are therefore important in atmospheric




photochemistry.  Free radicals in polluted air arise mainly from the dissociation




of excited molecules that have absorbed solar radiation (see paragraph B above)




or from reactions of such radicals with ordinary molecules.  Free atoms and




free radicals are very reactive species because they have unsatisfied bonding




orbitals.  That is, they have unpaired electrons that normally would interact




with other unpaired electrons and nuclei to form strong chemical bonds.  Upon




collision with molecules and other atoms or free radicals, new stable molecules




and new free radicals can be formed.  Thus, when free radicals are formed




in polluted air, they may rapidly initiate a chain of reactions that subsequently




lead to the formation of the many species found after irradiation.




          A brief introduction  to the principles of chemical kinetics is



presented in the following paragraphs in order to facilitate the understanding




of air pollution systems.  The  presentation consists of definitions and empirical




relationships and some theories that help to explain the observed phenomena.




The concept of rates of  reactions and rate constants is especially helpful




in judging the relative  importance of  competing processes  in photochemical




smog.




        a.  Rate Laws




          It has been found experimentally that  the rates  of simple chemical






                                      4-32

-------
 reactions are a function of the concentrations of the reacting species,




                             Rate - k(A)n(B)m                                  (4-29)




 in which the rate may represent the amount of reactant being lost per unit




 time per unit volume or the amount of products being formed per unit time




 per unit volume.   The units of rate may, for example, be moles per liter per




 minute.   Jk is called the specific rate constant and is the rate at unit




 concentration of  reactants.  Some useful units and conversion factors  for con-




 centrations and rate constants are presented in Table 4-6.




           (A), and (B) , etc., are the concentrations of the reactants; the




exponents, n and m, are small integers—0, 1 or 2,  The over-all order of the




 reaction is equal to the sum of n, m, etc.  Most elementary reactions are of




 order 2, although orders 1 and 3 are possible.




           A complex chemical reaction takes place in a series of a simple




 elementary steps.  Although these steps may not always be known, the investigator




 may postulate a reasonable set of elementary reactions in order to explain the




 appearance of products.  Such a set of reactions is called a mechanism.  From




 this set of simple reactions, one may derive a rate law and compare it with




 experimental observations.  If reasonable agreement is shown, the postulated




 mechanism is a possible one.  A test of this kind may be made on the postulated




 reactions that take place in polluted air.  For each elementary reaction, one




 can write a rate  expression.  For example, for the process,




                                   A + B -> C                                    (4-30)




                                   C + D -> E                                    (4-31)
                                       4-33

-------
    Table 4-6.  CONVERSION FACTORS.1
    ("Based on concentration in ppm and pphm relative
            to air at 1 atm, 25°C.)
              Concentrations
       -1             9
moles 1   x 2.445 x 10  * pphm
        -1             12
moles cc   x 2.445 x 10   « pphm
pphm x 4.09 x 10    • moles 1
pphm x 4.09 x 10    - moles cc
               Rate constants, k
Bimolecular
     1 mole  sec   x 2.45 x 10   • ppm  min
     cc mole  sec   x 2.45 x 10   - ppm  min
     1 mole  sec   x 1.47 x 10   - pphm  r»r
     cc mole  sec   x 1.47 x 10   • pphm  nr
Termolecular
      2     -2   -1             -13      -2   -1
     1  Mole  sec   x 1.005 x 10    - PP*  min
       2    -2   -1             -19      -2   -1
     cc mole  sec   x 1.005 x 10    - ppm  min
      2    -2   -1             16       -2  -1
     1 mole  sec   x 6.03 x 10    - pphm  hr
       2    _2   -i            _22       -2  -1
     cc mole  sec   x 6.03 x 10    " pphm  hr
                   4-34

-------
the rate of formation of E is

                             d(E) = k   (C) (D)                                 (4-32)
                             ___    31


But C may be a reactive intermediate such as a free radical, whose rate of

formation may be equalled by its rate of reaction.  That is, as soon as a C

radical is formed, it reacts with D to form E.  In this case,

                          d(C) = 0 = k  XA) (B) - k  (C) (D)                    (4- 13)
                          dt          JU           Ji

from which, under so-called "steady-state" conditions,


                         Steady-State = k30(A) /k3l(D)                    (4'3A)

insertion of this result in (4-32) gives


                         7^ = VD) k3Q(A) (B) - k ,n(A) (B)                 (4-35)
                                    k31(D)            JU

          The derived rate law will verify that the mechanism (4-30) and

(4-31) is appropriate if experiment shows that the rate of formation of E is

directly proportional to the product of (A) times (B).

        b.  Collision Theory

          The most frequent  chemical reactions in the gas phase involve

bimolecular interactions.  In the simplified theory, the interaction is viewed

as one of the collision between two hard spheres.  When two spheres collide,

they come together at a distance between centers called the collision

diameter 
-------
£
 Figure 4-4.   MOLECULES A AND 8 IN COLLISION.
                      4-36

-------
result in reaction; this proportion is known as the  collision  yield  and is



exponentially related to the temperature as expressed  in  equation  (4-36)


                                    —E/RT
                              y - pe  '                                         (4-36)



where E is the activation energy of the reaction, II  is  the universal gas  con-



stant, T is the absolute temperature and p_ is a probability  factor which  is



also characteristic of the reaction.



          According to simple kinetic theory of gases,  appropriate collisions



occur at a rate proportional to the concentrations of  the colliding  molecules;



thus




                             rc " ZAB(A)(B)                                     (4~37)


when.' r  is the rate of collision (in a unit volume  of  the gas phase)  and Z
       (~                                                                   A.JJ

is a frequency factor which can be estimated from the  dimensions of  the



colliding molecules.  The product of this collision  rate  by  the collision



yield y is the rate of reaction of A^ with IJ,
          Comparison with equation  (4-29) shows that,  if m  and n  are  both



unity, the rate constant k can be identified as the product of the  collision



yield, y_, by the frequency factor,  Z._.  Thus
                                    AD
          Values of Z   are normally of the order of magnitude  of  3x10
                     Ajj


liter/mole sec., equivalent to about 4x10 ppm  hr   .   Collision yields depend



strongly on the energy of activation, but cannot be larger  than unity.   Values



of k_, for all practical purposes, are thus constrained to be  smaller  than



3x10   liter/mole sec.  Furthermore, the value of k is considered  to  be  less
                                      4-37

-------
         11                                —E/RT
than 3x10   times the exponential factor, e     ; thus, If a lower limit for



£ can be reliably estimated, an upper  Limit less than 3x10   liter/mole sec.



can be assigned for k_.  This procedure can be very useful in estimating rates



of elementary steps for use in postulated mechanisms of complex reactions,  as



shown in Chapter 6 in connection with the photochemical smog reaction system.



          In summary, a chemical reaction results when two molecules collide



with sufficient energy and in the proper orientation to produce the activated



complex.  The collision theory offers, for any specified elementary reaction,



a means of estimating an upper bound to its specific rate constant.  As a



general explanation of chemical rate phenomena, the collision  theory has



several weaknesses.  First, the factor p_ may not be readily correlated with the



structures and properties of the reacting molecules.   Secondly, abnormally  high



rates cannot be interpreted on this basis.  These faults can be overcome  to a



large extent by the application of absolute rate theory.  (For a brief



introduction to this more elaborate theory, refer to Calvert and Pitts  (2,



p. 608ff).



    2.  Thermal Reactions



          As a result of the photodissociation processes, atoms, radicals and



excited molecules are available to react thermally  (that is, by collisions) with



otherwise stable species.  The list of these compounds includes nitrogen,



water, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide,  sulphur  trioxide, sulphuric



acid, alcohols, organic acids, and hydrocarbons, as well as compounds  th  f  do



absorb sunlight (Table 4-4).  All such interactions are classified as  secondary



reactions.
                                      4-38

-------
          The most important secondary reactions include  the  conversion of
NO to N0?, the formation of ozone, and the oxidation of hydrocarbons.  An
extensive review of these reactions is presented in paragraph D. below.  It  is
very useful to compare the rates of these reactions in order  to ascertain
which ones are more likely to predominate.  If the rate constant is  large  and
the concentrations of reactants are high, reaction proceeds rapidly.   If the
rate constants are too small or the concentrations of the reacting species are
too low, reaction takes place slowly and is not important.
          By way of illustration, one could compare the rates of the very
important processes of olefin oxidation.  The principal reactions are  the
oxidation by 0 atoms,
                            0 +  ^OC ->• Products
                                 /   \
and the oxidation by ozone
                         0- +  C=C  •* Products
          The range of specific rate constants for the oxygen atom reactions
is about 10  to 10   liter mole   sec  , while those of ozone are from 10  to  10
liter mole   sec  .  These values apparently favor the oxygen atom reactions,
since the ratio
                              = 105 to 10?
However, the actual rates depend upon  concentrations  as  well  as  rate  constants,
and the steady-state concentration of  oxygen atoms  relative  to ozone  is
frequently about 10   to 10   .  Using  the  rate  laws,
                                      4-39

-------
                           Rate Q m kglOHOlefin]



                           Rate Q   kQ [03][01efin]
Therefore, Raten
               U -  10


           Rateo3




          Under those conditions, oxygen atom oxidation of olefins might be only



10 times as fast as ozone reactions with the same olefins.  Thus bot>> oxvgen



atom and ozone oxidation could occur at appreciable rates, neither being



negligible relative to the other.  Such considerations are especially useful



in comparing rates of competitive reactions, which are not uncommon in the



development of photochemical air pollution.



    3-  The Generation of Free Radicals



          Free radicals may be produced in photochemical smog in at least two



important ways.  In the first, a neutral molecule absorbs light and is promoted



to an excited state.  The excess energy in the molecule is eventually trans-



ferred into vibration of chemical bonds, and the molecule is split into two



or more fragments which may be free radicals.  Examples of free radicals



produced  in this manner by reactions discussed in paragraph B, above, are given



in Table  4-7.



          The second process of  free radical formation involves the bimolecular



reactions of molecules and radicals which  produce excited intermediates which



dissociate, producing new radicals.  The reactions of 0 atoms, 0»  and



NO  with  hydrocarbons, especially olefins> give rise  to this type  of behavior.
                                      4-40

-------
          Table 4-7.  SOME FREE RADICALS AND
                      ATOMS GENERATED BY PHOTOLYSIS
Absorber Molecules
°3
N02
HN03
RON02
RONO
RN02
RCHO
RCOR
Active Species Produced*
0
0
OH
RO
RO
R
R + HCO
RCO + R
oxygen atom
oxygen atom
hydroxyl
alkoxyl
alkoxyl
alkyl
alkyl + formyl
acyl + alkyl
      ROOR
RO
alkoxyl
*  R is any alkyl group.
                          4-41

-------
          The thermal dissociation of molecules is also possible.  This process




takes place when heat in excess of the bond energy is absorbed by a molecule




as a result of energetic collisions.  However, at ambient temperatures only




a negligible fraction of molecules has sufficient energy to cause thermal




dissociation.




          Free radicals are also prouuced by the reaction of other free




radicals with reactant molecules.  Such reactions are discussed in paragraph 5




below, following the general introduction to chain reactions in paragraph 4.




          Table 4-8 summarizes the kinds of free radicals that are probably




formed by the action of sunlight on polluted air.  It should be noted that




NO, N07, NO. and even 0. possess unpaired electrons and behave as free




radicals in many instances.  The general reactions of each of these are reviewed




in paragraph D.




    4.  General Treatment of Radical Chain Reactions




          Free radical chain reactions are initiated by molecular collisions,




photolysis or any other method that can generate free radicals.  The first




step can be represented by *




                                 A •* mR + nB                                   (4-40)




In one type of reaction chain, when the free radical chain carrier, R, collides




with another molecule, it can continue the process by a propagation step such as




                                 R + C ->• R + D                                 (4-41)




Here the radical R is reproduced so that it is free to repeat reaction (4-41)




many times before the chain process is broken or terminated.
*A, B, D, C, and E are reactant or product molecules, and m and n are integers.



                                     4-42

-------
                  Table  4-8.  FREE RADICAL CLASSES  FORMED
                              IN  IRRADIATED POLLUTED AIR.
Name of Radical

  alkyl

  alkoxyl

  peroxyalkyl

  hydroxyl

  hydroperoxyl

  formyl

  acyl

  peroxyformyl

  peroxyacyl

  formate


  acylate
Formula*

  R-

  RO-

  ROO-

  OH

  HOO-

  HCO

  RCO
    *°
  HC-00-
    ^0
  RC-00-
   0
   ii
  HCO-
   0
   ii
  RCO'
*R is any alkyl group.
                                     4-43

-------
                              R + R + M-»-R2+M                                (4-42)


In reaction (4-42), two free  radicals  recombine to form a neutral molecule

which cannot react further, thus breaking  the chain.



An example of this kind of single- chain  carrier process with second order


breaking is the ortho-para hydrogen conversion,

           initiation       M + H.(o or  p)  -»• 2H + M                             (4-43)


           propagation      H + H,,(p)  -*•  H2(o) + H                               (4-44)

                                                                                 (4-45)
           termination      M + 2H •*• H_(o  or p) + M



A more important case occurs  with two  chain carriers  and second-order


breaking,


           initiation            A -+-R + S                                       (4-46)

                                             C                                   (4_47)
L R + B > S +
<
( S + D -». R +
           propagation

                                             E                                   (4-48)

           termination          2R + M -»• RZ + M                                  (4-49)

Here R and S  are  two  different free radical chain carriers.



A  famous  example  of this kind of behavior is the formation of HBr from H. + Br-


           initiation             Br2 •* 2Br                                     (4-50)


                               Br * H2 -> HBr + H                                 (4-51)


           propagation         H + Br2 •* HBr + Br                                (4-52)


                               H + HBr -»• H2 + Br                                 (4-53)


                                       4-44

-------
           termination            2Br •> Br2                                     (4-54)

Chain reactions of the kind that may occur in photochemical smog and involving

free radicals like those in Table 4-8, are postulated in what is called  the
              18
"Rice-Herzfeld   mechanism."  The thelnnal or photochemical dissociation  of

acetaldehyde can be treated as follows,

           initiation         CH CHO -v CH  + CHO                                (4-55)


                                 CHO -»• H + CO                                   (4-56)

                           H + CH3CHO -»• H? + CH^CO                              (4-57)
           propagation
                              f CH3CHO -»• CH4 + CH3CO                            (4_58)

                               CH CO -»• CH  + CO                                 (4-59)

           termination           2CH  -»• C H,                                    (4-60)


Using a steady-state approximation* on all free radicals, this mechanism

leads to the rate expression
                             \R /k59 \ •^         Ml
                      Rate-  58{^r-}    [CH3CHO]J/^                          (4.61)
     5.   Free Radical Reaction Types in Photochemical Smog

The free radical types shown in Table 4-8 react with virtually all of  the

species in polluted air.  The important reactions include those with 0? , NO,NO_,

0  and reactions among the free radicals themselves.  A detailed description of
*The steady-state approximation is based on the assumption  that the  free
 radicals are produced and lost at the same rates so that the  concentrations
 remain constant as long as reactants are available.   This permits  one to  set
 d[R] « 0 and solve for a steady-state concentration as was done  in  equation  (4-33).
 d[t]
                                     4-45

-------
these reactions is given in paragraph D.  A few general  features  of  these
reactions, however, are of interest here.

     Oxygen molecules  are  the most  abundant reactive species in air; however, most
of the reactions of CL are relatively slow.   Oxygen molecules can add to free
radicals producing more complex  radicals:
                                R. + 02 •+ R02-

They can enter into metathetical reactions:
                             CH3 + 02 •*• CH20  + HO

Nitric oxide may add to free radicals quite readily,  since  it  is  itself  an odd
electron molecule.
                                 R- + NO -»• RNO
or                                      0
                            RCO  -4- NO •* RCNO   etc.
NO can be oxidized  to NO.:
                              ROO + NO •+• RO + N02
Nitrogen dioxide may  also  add  to  free radicals,  since it is an odd electron
molecule.
                               RO- + N02 •* RON02

It may also donate oxygen  to some free radicals:
                               R«+ N02 -»• RO1  + NO
and  NO. may abstract  hydrogen  from free radicals:
                           RCH26 + N02 •*• RCHO + HONO
                                      4-46

-------
 Ozone may react directly:




                               R-+ 03 -»• RO- + 0





 In addition, the zwitterions formed as a result of the attack of 0» on oleflns,
 may react further to yield free radicals, although this has not been experimen-




 tally demonstrated.




          Rates of these reactions depend on various factors determined in part




 by the structures of the substituent radicals.  Details of individual reactions




are discussed in paragraph D.
                                       4-47

-------
D.   A THESAURUS OF PROPOSED REACTIONS IN THE URBAN PHOTOCHEMICAL SYSTEM



          Experimental and theoretical research has produced considerable insight



into the chemical reactions in photochemical smog.  It is now widely accepted



that the process involves photo-oxidation of hydrocarbon vapors, with N0«



as the main effective primary absorber.  However, detailed steps in the



photo-oxidation are still subjects of conjecture.  This paragraph presents



a comprehensive collection of the chemical reactions which may be taking



place in smog formation.  The reactions are grouped by appropriate categories,



e.g., inorganic reactions, free radical reactions, etc.  A summary in each



category cites the most probable reactions occurring in that category.



          Photochemical smog reactions have been studied by a large number



of investigators.  Although references to original work are included where



appropriate, no attempt has been made to cite all the references to studies



of the chemistry of smog.  In addition to this paragraph, the reader is


                                    19       20
referred to the reviews of Leighton,   Wayne,   Altshuller and


         21          22                           23
Bufalini,   Stephens,   and Haagen-Smit and Wayne.



    1.  Inorganic Reactions



          A number of reactions can occur when air containing oxides of



nitrogen is irradiated with sunlight in the absence of organic gases.  The



reactions which can occur are summarized in Table 4-9 and 4-10.
                                     4-48

-------
Table 4-9.  INORGANIC REACTIONS.

        N02  +  hv « NO + 0                           (Al)
        0 +  02+M=03+M                         (A2)
        03 + NO - 02 + NO.,                          (A3)
        0 +  N02 + M = N03 -f M                       (A4)
        0 +  N02 - 02 + NO                           (A5)
        0 +  03 = 202                                (A6)
        0 +  NO + M = N02 + M       '                 (A7)
        0 +  0  + M -' 02 -f- M»                          (A8)
        N03  +  NO - 2N02            ,                 (A9)
        N03  +  N02 - N205                            (A10)
        N205 - N03 + N02                            (All;
        2NO  +  02 = 2N02                             (A12)
        N03  +  N02 - NO + 02 + N02                   (A13)

        N°2  +  °3 " N°3 + °2                         ^A14)
        03 + hv - 02 + 0                            (A15)
        2N03 - 2N02 + 02                            (A16)
        NO -f N02 -I- H20 - 2HN02                      (A17)
        N205 + H20 i. 2HN03                          (A18)
                                                   (A19)
        2HNO - N20 + H20                           (A20)
        N03 + H20 - HN03 + OH                      (A21)
        H20 + 0 = 20H                              (A22)
        02+M = 0 + 0+M                         (A23)
        03+M = 0 + 02+M                        (A24)
        02 + 02 - 0 + 03                           (A25)

                4-49

-------
              Table 4-10.  RATE CONSTANTS FOR THERMAL

                           HOMOGENEOUS INORGANIC REACTIONS.
Reaction
Number
A2*
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7

A8b
A9
A10
All
A12
A13
A14
A16
A17
A23b
A24a
A25
Rate
Constant
k2
k3
k4
S
k6
k7

k8
k9
kio
kll
k!2
k!3
k!4
k!6
k!7
k23
k24
R25
Value*
(i, mole, sec.)
1.68 X 107 exp (2.1/RT)
1.17 X 107 - 2.8 X 107 (300°K)^
10U (300° K)
3.3 X 109 (300°K)
1.205 X 1010 exp (-4.79/RT)
1.8 X 1010 (300°K) [or 7.5 X 108//
, j , mole sec ]
1.379 X 10 T" exp (-.34/RT)
5.6 X 109 (300°K)
1.8 X 109 (300°K)
0.24 (300°K)
1.5 X 104 (300°K)
2.5 X 105 (300°K)
2 X 104 - 4.3 X 104 (300°K)
1.2 X 104 (300°K)
4.3 X 107 (300°K)
2.75 X 1016 i"1 exp (-118.7/RT)
9.94 X 1011 exp (-22.72/RT)
1.28 X 1010 exp (-100.6/RT)

Reference »
24
25
26
27
24
28

24
29
25
25
1
25
29,30,31
25
32
24
24
24
»
Activation energies are in Kcal mole x          a.  if M  is 0_.


Range of values represents reported variations
                                                D.  if M  IS
                                                              _.
                                  4-50

-------
          The main reactions which occur are (A1,A2,A3).  The primary


                                                 19              —1
photolysis rate of (Al) was estimated by Leighton   to be 0.4 min   with



bright sunlight at a zenith angle of 20 degrees.  Reactions  (A2) and (A3) are



also very fast, resulting in a conversion of light to heat in the sequence,



and the establishment of a steady-state. .



          Although. (Al to A3) are the most important inorganic reactions,
                                                                          0


several other reactions may be of secondary importance.  Reactions (A4 to A8)



involve reactions of oxygen atoms which must compete with (A2).  Reaction (A4)



may be important in systems in which the concentration of N0_ is much higher



than in polluted air.  Reaction (A7) may be important when NO is in great



excess.  Reaction (A5) is too slow to compete with (A4),  Reactions (A6) and



(A8) are too slow to be of any importance.



          Reactions (A9) to (A14) involve other reactions of 0- and nitrogen



oxides.  The most important processes consuming NO- are (A9) and (A10).



These two reactions are fast enough to prevent the accumulation of NO



from (A4).  Of the two reactions (A9) is somewhat faster than (A1Q), pre-



venting the accumulation of N-O,.  Reaction (All) is very slow and probably



not competitive with (A18) when water vapor is present.  Reaction (A12)



accounts for the oxidation of NO to N0_ in the dark but is far too slow to be



of importance in sunlight.  Reaction (A13)  is negligible compared to (A10).



Reaction (A14) is slow relative to (A13) but is probably significant in
                                     4-51

-------
systems with high concentrations of 0,.  This reaction could be an important



source of NO,.  Reaction (A15), the photolysis of 0,, is estimated to be



only about 1/20 - I/SO as fast as (Al) at similar concentrations.  Reaction



(A16) is negligible compared to (A9) and (A10).



          Reactions (A17) to (A21) could occur in the presence of water vapor.


        19
Leighton   has suggested that appreciable fractions of the oxides of



nitrogen could be hydrolyzed by (A17) and (A18) in a period of an hour or



less, which is sufficiently rapid to warrant consideration in atmospheric



systems.  However, (A17) can be shown unimportant by equilibrium considerations.



The direct hydrolysis of N02 by (A19) is quite slow.  Reaction (A20) was


                     33
postulated by Tuesday   to account for small amounts of N-0 in the



photo-oxidation of trans-2-butene.  The existence of the species HNO has not

                                                 •*


been confirmed, however, in photo-oxidation systems.  Reaction (A21) is



endothermic and thus quite slow compared to (A9) and (A10).  Reactions (A23),



(A24), and (A25) are unimportant.



          The reactions can be separated according to their probable importance



in photochemical smog:



        a.  Primary Importance:   (A1,A2,A3).



        b.  Secondary Importance:   (A4,A5,A7,A9,A12,A14,A15,A18).



        c.  Negligible Importance:   (A6,A8,A10,A11,A13,A16,A17,A19,A20,A21,



            A22,A23,A24,A25).
                                     4-52

-------
          The  reaction  of  0  atoms  with $()„  may play an important roio Ln tlir



production of  SO.  and subsequently H_SO,  in smog.   HoSO  W1H form aerosols with



water.  The  reactions are



                                0  + SO •*• S03*                                (A26)





                               S03* + M -»•  SO + M                              (A27)
                                                                               (A28)
                                              34                 35
Reaction (A26) was studied by Jaffe  and Klein   and  by Kaufman.     It


                                          10       2     —2    —1
yielded a rate constant  equal to  1.4 x 10   liter mole  sec   for the over-all
reac L ion
                             S02 +  0  + M -»• S03  + M                             (A29)
    2-  Reactions of Atomic Oxygen and  Hydrocarbons



Compounds containing carbon-hydrogen bonds  are particularly susceptible to



attack by free oxygen  atoms.   Among  the most  reactive hydrocarbons are the



olefins and other compounds containing  olefinic double bonds.   The elementary



step  is usually conceived  as  the  addition of  the oxygenation to the double



bond  to form an activated  complex which may decompose in various ways.  The


                                                         21
general olefin-atomic  oxygen  reactions  can  be written as
                                K      I\_     "T U     "•>                      ..
                         3       \   /3      1 ,   ./ 3                      081)

                       0(JP) +    >C/   +     V
                                     4-53

-------
                                                        •v                     (B2)
                                                      A    R   *
                                                           'R3
           0(*D) +   *  ^C=-C^          -^     ^    \ '                 
                                                           \
The asterisk indicates that the complex possessed excess energy and will
rapidly participate in further reactions or decomposition.
          The reactions of oxygen atoms with paraffins are slower than with
olefins.  The most likely elementary step seems to be
                                                                               (B4>
                               RH + 0 -*• R- + OH
with a race constant of 10  to 10  1 mole   sec  .

          Rate constants for the reactions of atomic oxygen and hydrocarbons
                                             21                36 37 38
have been compiled by Altshuller and Bufalini   and Cvetanovic.  '  '
Rate constants (1 mole   sec  ) are shown in Table 4-11.

          The probable reaction of aldehydes and atomic oxygen is
                              RCHO + 0 -»• RCO + OH                              (B5)
                                    8       —1    —1
with a rate constant the order of 10  1 mole   sec

          Products from the decomposition of the activated complexes in  (Bl)
to  (B3) differ for the various olefins, but comprise principally the correspond-
A
inf. olefin oxides and aldehydes derived from them by slight rearrangement
The following product distribution has been observed from the  reaction of

                                      4-54

-------
                    Table 4-11.   RATE CONSTANTS OF ATOMIC OXYGEN-HYDROCARBON REACTIONS.
 r                    Hydrocarbon               Rate Constant                     Reference
*                    	               (I, mole, sec)                    	
                     Ethylene                     3.1 x 108                         39,40

                                                          9
                     I'ropylene                    1.7 x 10                            *


                     1- Butene                    1.7 x 109                           *

                                                          9
                     Isobutene                    7.5 x 10                            *


                     Cis-2-butene                 7.1 x 109                           *

                                                          9
                     Trans-2-butene               8.5 x 10                            *

                                                          9
                     n-1-pentene                  3.1 x 10                            *

                                                          9
                     cis-2-pentene                6.8 x 10                            *


                     1-Hexene                     1.95 x 109                          *


                     Cyclopentene                 1.46 x 10                           *


                     Cyclohexene                  1.32 x 1Q10                    36,37,38


                     2-Methyl-2butene             3.88 x 1Q10                    36,37,38


                     2,3-Dimethyl-2-butene        5.12 x 1Q10                    36,37,38


                     1,3-Butadiene                1.19 x 1Q10                    36,37,38


                     Benzene                      1.98 x 107                     36,37,38


                     Toluene                      6.93 x 10?                     36,37,38


                     1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene       3.3 x 1Q8                         21

                                                          9
                     Styrene                      5.0 x 10                          21


                     3-Methylheptane              6.5 x 10                          28



                     * Calculated from the relative rates of 0 + X vs. 0 + C.H -iso, X=NO =0.44
                                       91                              9    4 8    -1   -5
                       from reference,  i   where k(0 + NO ) = 3.3 X 10 /liter/mole  sec  .
                                                    4-55

-------
                                                19
from the reaction of ethylene and atomic oxygen:



                                         .03 polymer


                                          n*i P u A
                                         • UJ V^_H,U
                                         .05 H2 + CH2 + CO
                CH2CO
                                         .04 H2



                                         .10 H + C2H30



                                         .75 CH« + HCO
The activated complexes in  (Bl) and  (B2) formed in the propylene-atomic
                                                                         19
oxygen reaction can participate in the following further reaction  steps;'



                                                         CH.CHLCHO  (propionaldehyde)
          CH3-C-CH2
                                                     (M)
                                                         decomposition
                                 CH-9-CH *   (M)

                                     H      ——.
                       0
                       I \


                      H
                                                               (propylene oxide)
                      decomposition
               0
               I  .
           CH-C-CH2
                                   CH.  C-CH *
                                     3  u    3
                                                 (M)
                   (CH )2CO  (acetone)
                        0
                        /\
CH3-C — CH2*  CM)  CH3-C-CH2   (propylene oxide)


    H        "    ^    "

              N.            0
               X  .        II
decomposition      CH, + CH,C-
                                     4-56

-------
When molecular oxygen is present the propylene  oxide  will  react with 0-,



most likely according to     Q
                        PU — p—.PH  -*• n  -*• PU Pun 4.  i
                        \>nA v* v«*i«^ ~  o   v/ti^v^nw  i  r

                          J H              J        Z


The reaction of 1-butene with atomic oxygen has been  found  to yield 57 percent



a-butene oxide and 43 percent butyraldehyde.   '   '     The mechanism accounting for



these products is similar to that for propylene:            n
       C H-C-CH

            H
                                                        decomposition
                              C3H7CHO*.     (M") ^    C3H?CHO   (butyraldehyde)
                                    0                    0
                                    / \                   / \
                                2H5CHCH2*     (M) i   C2H5CHCH2  (a-butene oxide)
                                          0
            0
            i
                             C3H_CHO*
>  C  H?CHO (butyraldehyde)
Cis-2-butene and atomic oxygen yield  25  each cis-and trans-3-butene oxide,


22 percent isobutyraldehyde  and  28  percent  methyl ethyl ketone (2-butanone) .



          The probable mechanism for  this reaction is again similar to those
above and is:
                                     4-57

-------
             CH3-H-
                                                      decomposition
                                HC-CH(CH3)2*—*(CH3)2CHCHO   (Isobutyraldehyde)



                                            —* decomposition                  .
H       H *  M   H      H    (cis/and trans-
                                6 - butene oxide)
                                  v A XH *  M   H\ A/H
                                  V-C      — V     C^-c'
                                            — •> decomposition




          The reactions for trans-2-butene are similar to those for cis-2-butene. Iso


butene-atomic oxygen products include methyl ethyl betone, isobutene oxide and


isobutyr aldehyde .




          Reactions of hydrocarbons and atomic oxygen can now be summarized.  Only a


minor fraction of the ethylene consumed when reacting with atomic oxygen


yielded products with two carbon atoms.  Fragmentation into methyl and formyl


radicals is apparently the principal process.  In the propylene-atomic oxygen


reaction the main products are propylene oxide, propionaldehyde, acetone and


small amounts of carbon monoxide.  The main fragmentation process is probably


to methyl and acyl radicals.  The butenes yield butene oxides, butyraldehyde and


methyl ethyl ketone.   The main fragmentation process is expected to yiexa either


propionyl and formyl radicals or ethyl and acyl radicals.  In the presence of


0_ the products are typical of those in 0, attack.



                                      4-58

-------
                                   30
          Recently, Klein and Sheer   have proposed a new transition state



lor the 2-methyl-2-pentene reaction with 0( P).   They suggest a concerted



rearrangement of the transition state rather than the formation of an actual



biradical to obtain the products of the reaction.




    j.  Reactions of Ozone and Hydrocarbons



          0- is a strong oxidizing agent and will react with hydrocarbons and



other organics present in urban air.  Olefins are readily attacked by 0_



in the vapor phase, the initial step of which is usually assumed to be addition



of 0- to the olefin molecule to form an energetic complex.  The energetic



complex can decompose or switch to its isomer through loss of some of the



excess energy.



          Rate constants for 0.,-hydrocarbon reactions have been tabulated


                          21
by Altshuller and Bufalini   and are shown in Table 4-12   Each column



represents the results of particular investigators.



          The rate constants for the 1-olefins with the exception of ethylene fall


                                                                           20
closely together, while those for the 2-olefins may be considerably higher.
                                     4-59

-------
Table 4-12.  RATE CONSTANTS FOR OZONE-HYDROCARBON REACTIONS (i mole~1sec"1)xl03.
  Hydrocarbon                                     References
                                42         43         44         45        21
  Ethylene                     1.8        1.8        0.8                   1.6
  Tropylene                    5.1        3.8        4.9
  1-Butene                     3.9                                         3.2
  n-1-Pentene                  3.9        3.2        4.5
                                        u>
  n-1-Hexene                   4.6        6.1        6.1        5.5        6.8
  1-Octene                                4.9
  1-Decene                                6.6
  3-Methyl-l-butene            3.0
  isobutene                    3.6                   3.7                   14
  2-Methyl-l-butene            4.0
  Cls-2-butene                13                     29                     200
  Trans-2-butene              17                                           260
                               *
  Trans-2-pentene             10                 .    98
  Trans-2-pentene             13
  3-Heptene  (cts-trana)                              53
  Cyclohexene                 14          35
  2-Methyl-2-butene           12                                           450
  2,3-Dimethyl-2-butene       14
  1,3-Butadiene                4.2                   4.9
  Acetylene                               0.04
  Xylene                                             <0.01
  Mesitylene                                                              <0.1
  Styrene                                                                   lb
  Arrolcin                                           0.45
  Crotonaldehyde                 .              "0.45
  Ketene                                             <0.04
                                        4-60

-------
          The products of the 0,,-olefin reactions vary depending on the particular


olefin.  Prominent products include aldehydes,  ketones and carboxylic acids.  The


most widely accepted reaction mechanism hypothesis is that the energetic  intermediate


formed from initial attack of 0, on the olefin decomposes  to  produce  a


carbonyl compound and an unstable intermediate compound, sometimes called a


zwitter ion.  Thus, the initial reaction is
           The zwitter ion is unstable and decomposes in various ways,  among


which may be:

                             V-
                               ;coo  -  R R  + co                               (C2)
                             D /
                             R2
                             R. + -

                               v COO  =  ROH + CO                                (C3)


                             H
                             R            '         II
                               xr ~  -  ROCH or HOCR                            (C4)


                             H
                               X COO  =  RO- + CHO                               (C5)
                             H
                                      4-61

-------
                          CH3
                             \+ -

                               COO  -   CH2-OO -f ELO                          (C6;

                             /
                           H
                           CH3CH2


                                 NCOO - C2H4 + HCOOH                           (C7)


                               H  '              °r


                                                HN+ -


                                                H





          In addition to decomposition, the zwitter ion can participate in



reactions with other species.  Possibilities include:





Olefins         ^        R.J        R$       0     R3  6    RS


                   ^ COO +    ^C~C^   -   RjCR. +    ^C-C^              •      (C8)

                R2X      RAX      R6               4         6
Oxygen          Rl  +  _
                         +   °2  '  R1CR2 + °3                                   (C9)
                KO
                Rl

                   ^
                             00  -   Rn. + C00  + HOO                             (CIO)
                              212
 NO               R,                    0
                     COO  +  NO  -  R CR-  + NO                                  (Cll)
                   X                 1  i      /

                 R2
                                      4-62

-------
                         R   +_       R    ,0S X3

Ketones          R,CR, +  J  COO   -       C     C^                           (C12)

                  1      P  '           R    x        R
                         R4            R2   0-0    K4
N00             R.                   0
  i              1^ + -              IL

             2      COO + N00  -   R^R, + N0_                                 (C13)
                  ^         i       1  i     J

                R2
          In addition, two zwitter ions could react
                  x

             2      COO   -       C       Cv                       .            (C14)

                R             R'  0-0     R
forming an alkylidene peroxide which, however, has not been observed.  Another


possible reaction between two zwitter ions is
                              2R1R2CO + 02                                     (C15)
Mechanisms alternate to that of the zwitter ion have been proposed.  A direct



dissociation of the original activated complex to two free radicals has been



suggested by Wayne.    It is unlikely, however that a large proportion of



0 -olefin collisions would yield free radicals directly.





    4.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and Molecular Oxygen or Ozone.



          There is substantial evidence for the existence of chain reactions



in  the photochemical smog system.  These chain reactions proceed with the aid
                                     4-63

-------
of free radicals, the unpaired elections of which are preserved through the



various steps of the chain even though the species with the unpaired electron



may change from step to step.



          Haagen-Smit, et al.   concluded that 0, was formed in a chain



reaction during the photo-oxidation of 3-methylheptane.  They suggested that



alkyl and peroxyalkyl radicals might be the chain-propagating species.  Cadle


47
   suggested that peroxyalkyl radical could be responsible for the conversion



of NO to NC>2 in photo-oxidation systems.  Schuck, et al.   compared the



observed rates of consumption of olefins in photo-oxidation systems with  the



expected rates based on literature values for the reactions with 0, and 0.



They found the observed rates much faster than the expected rates.  They



attributed the "excess rate" to reactions of the olefins with free radicals


                       33
in the system.  Tuesday   concluded that a free radical chain reaction



Initiated by reaction of oxygen atoms and olefin was important in the



photo-oxidation of trans-2-butene and NO.



          Wayne   has provided a clear explanation of  the importance of



chain reactions in photochemical smog.  Since oxygen atoms are known to react



very readily with olefins, it is feasible that the chain reactions be initiated



by this reaction.  However, only a fraction of the oxygen atoms generated



can be assumed to react with olefins because of competition with the 0~ reaction.



Also, the olefin-oxygen atom reaction yields a variety of products, not all



of which are capable of propagating chains.  For example, if only half of the



oxygen atoms generated react with olefins and only one olefin molecule in



five yields free radicals when it reacts with an oxygen atom, then a chain





                                     4-64

-------
length of 60 would be necessary to account for an observed quantum yield of 6.




Thus, only small amounts of N0« are required to initiate the process.  As the




small amount of NO- dissociates into NO and oxygen atoms, chains are initiated




and NO  is produced from''NO in a self-accelerating process.  This is precisely




the situation in early morning urban air, in which small quantities of N0« are




capable of initiating the daily smog cycle.




          Reactions responsible for the generation of free radicals have been




outlined above, mainly from the hydrocarbon-oxygen atom and hydrocarbon-ozone




reactions.  One of the most probable steps is the fragmentation of the




activated complexes in (Bl),  (B2) and  (B3) to yield two free radicals, e.g., the




production of methyl and formyl radicals from the ethylene-atoznic oxygen reaction.




Another example is the production of free radicals from atomic oxygen in (B4).




Another possible source of free radicals is the decomposition of the activated




complex from the olefin-ozone reaction as in (C5).  In addition, reactions of the




zwitter ion might yield free radicals  (C8), (CIO), as well as the photolysis of




various organic compounds as shown in Table 4-4.




          In this and succeeding subparagraphs, possible reactions of free




radical species in polluted urban air are outlined.   In each case a summary




lists the most important reactions of each type.  In this subparagraph the




reactions of free radicals with molecular oxygen are outlined.  For the




most part, these are chain-propagating reactions which conserve the number




of free radicals in the system.  Reactions are listed by radical type.
                                     4-65

-------
a.  Alkyl Radicals R-


            R- 4- 02  (+M) - R06  (4M)                              (D1)



    e.g.,   CH3- + 02 (-W) - CH300  (4M)




b.  Acyl Radicals RCO   Q

                        H  .
            RCO + 0  «* RCOO  (peroxyacyl)                         (02)
            RCO + 02  -  RO  + C02
    e.g.,   HCO + 02  -  OH + C02
             CH3CO
             RCO -I- 02 - ROO + CO                                 (D4)
                        4-66

-------
    e.g.,   HCO + 0  = HOO + CO
                          ^

            RCO + 20. " R&6 4- 0,                                  (D5)
                               '3
c.  Peroxyalkyl Radicals ROO


            ROO + 0  - RO + 0,                                    (D6)
                        RCC
d.  Peroxyacyl Radicals RCOO

             0           0
             ii .         II.
            RCOO + 02 = RCO +
e.  Acylate Radicals RCO

              0
            RCO 4- 0   - RCO + 03                                  (D8)


              0

            RCO + 00  = ROO + C0_                                 (D9)
 f.   Alkoxyl Radicals RO-


             RO-  + 0,, =• R'CHO + HOO                               (D10)
             RO'  + 0  - R* + 03                                   (D11>
                        4-67

-------
        g.   Hydroxyl Radical HO



            Does not react with 0. at ordinary temperatures.



        h.   Hydroperoxyl Radicals HOO



                              HOO- + 02 - 03 + HO-                             (D12)




        1.   Summary of Free Radical Reactions with 0.



          Reaction (Dl) is well substantiated as the most probable fate of



alkyl radicals in an oxygen-containing environment.  The rate constant is


        8           -1   -1
about 10  liter mole  sec  .   Of the various reactions of acyl radicals with 0_,



(D2) is probably most likely at ordinary temperatures.  This reaction, the



direct combination of acyl radicals and 02 to form peroxyacyl radicals, is



supported by the occurrence of PAN-type compounds in organic photo-oxidation


                            49
systems.  Taylor and Blacet    suggested (D3) and (D4) aa possible



reactions to compete with (D2).  Reaction (D5) was suggested by Schuck and



Doyle   to account for 0. production.



          Reaction (D6) has been often proposed to account for the



production of 0. in organic photo-oxidations.    In the oxidation of methyl



radicals ac room temperature,  (D6) has been suggested as the principal



route for destruction of peroxymethyl radicals.  Since it is certainly endothermic



by at least 20 Kcal, the collision yield can hardly be greater than 10~   ,



unless the alkoxy radicals are available in a higher electronic state or  a



highly excited vibrational state.  Such radicals with sufficient energy may be



produced by reaction  (Dl), but they are probably highly susceptible to



collisional deactivation.  Reaction  (D7) and  (D8) analogous to (D5) have



been proposed to account for the production of 0_ in urban air.  Their relative





                                     4-68

-------
importance is difficult to assess but, like (D6), they must be quite



endothcrmic.  Little evidence exists to support (D9), proposed by Stephens;



in contrast to (D8) it should be highly exothermic (ca. 50 Kcal) and thus



might have a high collision yield.


                                                                52
          Reaction (D10) has been suggested by Hanst and Calvert   to



explain the production of formaldehyde in the photolysis of dimethyl peroxide


                                         49
in the presence of 0~.  Taylor and Blacet   proposed (D10) as a competing



reaction to (Dll) in the photo-oxidation of biacetyl.  Schuck, et al.



also suggested (D10) could be responsible for acetaldehyde production.



Reaction (Dll), since it involves the rupture of a carbon-oxygen bond to form




an oxygen-oxygen bond, is even more endothermic than (D6) and is quite unlikely



to be of any significance in urban atmospheres.



          Some actual examples and rate constants are given in Table 4-13.



The direct reaction of 0_ with radicals has been suggested by Calvert and



Hanst   in the reaction



                             CH3 + 03 - CH36 + 02                             (D13)


                                                     Q      11
The rate constant for (D13) is estimated to be 5 x 10  to 10   liter



mole  sec  .  The rates of heavier alkyl radicals with ozone are not known,



but are probably of the same order of magnitude as that of methyl radicals.



A similar reaction would be expected with hydrogen atoms,



                              H- + 03 = OH + 0-                               (D14)



but no rate data are available.



    5.  Reactions Between Free Radicals and NO



          Nitric oxide may add to free radicals quite readily, since it itself






                                    4-69

-------
             Table 4-13.  SOME REACTIONS OF 0- WITH FREE RADICALS.
Reaction
                          Rate Constant  Preexponen-  Activation  Collision* Refer-

                          at 3QO°K       tial Factor   Energy     Yield      ence
                           3x10
                               10
                                                                             53
CH
                 + HO   ~6xlO
                     54
                                           10
                                                         5500
                     55
                          10
                            8.8
                                                                              53
           -RO -f
                                            10
                                             8.5
3500
55
 *                   k     -F/RT
  Collision Yield -  - - pe  '
                                      4-70
                                                                 IxlO"4       1

-------
is an odd electron molecule.  The requirement is that the excited adduct be


stabilized by collisions, since the excited molecule formed would dissociate


due to the exothermicity of the reaction.

              a.  Alkyl Radicals


                          R' + NO =• RNO                                        (El)



              b.  Acyl Radicals


                          RCO + NO - RCNO                                      (E2)



              c.  Peroxyalkyl Radicals


                          ROO + NO « ROONO (peroxyalkyl nitrite)               (E3)


                          ROO' + NO - RO- + NO,                                (E4)



              d.   Peroxyacyl Radicals
                           0           0

                          RCOO- + NO -  RCOONO (peroxyacyl nitrite)              (£5)

                           0           0
                           li           H
                          RCOO-+ NO - RCO-+ N02                                (E6)
              e.   Acylate Radicals
                           0          0
                           II-         II
                          RCO + NO - RCONO                                    (E7)

                           0
                           II.
                          RCO -I- NO - RCO + NO-                                (£8)
                                     4-71

-------
f.  Alkoxyl Radicals




            RO- + NO - RONO                                      (E9)




            RO- + NO - R'CHO + HNO                               (E1°)







g.  Hydroxyl Radicals




            HO-  -I- NO - HONO                                      (Ell)






h.  Hydroperoxyl Radicals




            HOO 4- NO - OH  + N02                                  (E12)




i.  Summary of  Free  Radical Reactions with Nitric Oxide




     (El)  is insignificant  when compared  to the  combination




    of alkyl radicals  and  Q^.  Also,  (£2) is  probably negligible




    when  compared to the corresponding reaction with  0?,  (D2).




    The peroxyalkyl  nitrite product in (E3) has not been




    observed with certainty.  It may be  a short-lived product




    or a  transition  state  for (E4).  Such molecules probably




    undergo rapid photolysis to the original  reactants or  to




    the products of  (E4),  and are  thus not important  as




    chain-terminating species.  Reaction (E4) has been pro-




    posed  to explain the rapid conversion of  NO to NO- in  organic



                            19
    photo-oxidation  systems.    Reaction (E4) is strongly




    exothermic  and would be a possible important reaction.
                       4-72

-------
        The peroxyacyl nitrite product in (E5) has not been observed.




        Reaction (£6), analogous to (E4), is strongly exothermic




        and believed to occur.  A plausible argument for the delayed




        appearance of FAN in such systems is that (E6) successfully




        competes with the PAN-forming reaction (F5) until all the NO




        is consumed.  The product in (E7) has not been observed.




        Reaction (E8), similar to (E6), would be highly exothermic




        and a possible route for conversion of NO to N0_.






        Ri-action (E9) may well be occurring with a high collision yield.




        However, the alkyl nitrite product is seldom observed because




        of its high efficiency of photodissociation.  Reaction (£10)




        has been postulated to explain the decrease in oxidation rate in




        the presence of excess NO.  Little evidence of the importance




        of (Ell), analogous to (E9), is available.  Reaction (E12),




        like (£4), is strongly exothermic and possibly important in




        urban atmospheres.




6.   Reactions Between Free Radicals and NO-
    a.   Alkyl Radicals




                                                                          (Fl)
                            R- + N02 - RO + NO                            (F2)
                                 4-73

-------
b.  Acyl Radicals        Q         _

                         H         II
            RCO + N02 - RCONO  or RCNC>2                           (F3)





c.  Peroxyalkyl Radicals


            ROO + N02 - RO + N03                                  (F4)





d.  Peroxyacyl Radicals

             0            0
             II  .           II
            RCOO + NO- - RCOONO   (peroxyacyl nitrate)            (F5)

                          9.
                       - RCO + N03                                (F6)

e.  Acylate Radicals

             0           0
             II           II
            RCO + N02 » RCON02                                   (F7)


             0
             «.
            RCO + N02 » RN02 + C02                                (F8)





f.  Alkoxyl Radicals


            RO + N02 - RON02  (alkyl  nitrate)                     (F9)


            RO + N02 -  R02  + NO                                   (F10)


g.  Hydroxyl Radicals


            OH + N02  (+M)  -  HN03(-Ht)                             (Fll)
                       4-74

-------
h.  Hydroperoxyl Radicals



                     HOO + N02 - N03 + OH                             (F12)



i.  Summary of Free Radical Reactions with NO.



    Reactions of (Fl) and (F2) probably cannot compete with



    (Dl).   Nevertheless, the nitroalkane product of (Fl) is



    relatively stable to photolysis and, at low 0. concentrations,



    could be a chain terminating step.  Reaction (F3) is probably



    negligible compared to (D2).








    Reaction (F4) is considerably less exothermic than the



    corresponding NO reactions, (E4) and (E6).  It is probable



    that this reaction will be slower than (E4) and (E6) by a


                3                              19
    factor of 10  at equivalent concentrations.    Similarly,



    (F6) is not favored energetically by comparison to (E4)



    and (E6).  Reaction (F5) is probably quite important,



    yielding peroxyacyl nitrates when the concentration ratio



    (N02)/(NO) becomes large.








    Reaction (F7) and (F8) are probably both unimportant



    compared to the decomposition of acylate radicals.  Reaction



    (F9) may be an important chain-terminating step.  It has been



    generally postulated to account for the occurrence of alkyl



    nitrates among the products of photo-oxidation systems.  An



    alternate reaction to (F9) is (F10), with a collision yield about
                            4-75

-------
           twice as great.


           Reaction  (Fll)  has  been suggested as a chain-terminating step

           for hydroxyl  radicals,  although nitric acid has not been commonly

           recognized as a product in photo-oxidations.  Reaction (F12) is

           analogous  to  (F4) ,  but  is energetically less favored.


           Table  4-14 presents rate constants, activation energy and

           collision  yield data for some reactions of free radicals with

           NO and N02 .


    7.   Reactions  Between Free  Radicals and Hydrocarbons

        a.  Alkyl  Radicals

                 R- +  XH  - RH + X.  (Hydrogen-Abstraction)                      (Gl)

                 R .  -I- R2CHO -  R H + R2CO                                      (G2)


                 R- 4- 
-------
           Table  4-14.   SOME REACTIONS OF NO AND N02 WITH FREE RADICALS.
Reaction
CH3 + NO— *-CH3NO
                          Rate Constant
                          at 300°K
6.3X10
      8
              Activation
               Energy
                                                         Collision
                                                          Yield       Reference

                                                                        57
                0
CH CO + NO—^CH CNO
              ~13.2 + 2.4
                                                                        58
1.7X10
                                                                        56
                   NO       3.3X10
                                                                       56
                                     4-77

-------
d.  Peroxacyl Radicals
              0
            RCOO + Oi - (RCO) 0 (};0)OJl'                                     (G17)
                         4-78

-------
             OH + XH - H_0 + X'                                    (G18)
             OH + RCHO - H20 + RCO                                 (G19)








 h.   Hydroperoxyl Radicals







             HOO + QA - (HOO)OX,-                                   (G20)
             HOO + RCHO « RCO' + H_02                              (G21)
i.   Summary of Free Radical Reactions with Hydrocarbons




    Of the three reactions (Gl), (G2), and (G3), (G3) is the most




    favored, although none of the three can compete with (Dl) in




    the urban atmosphere.  Reaction (G4) is probably slow when




    compared to (D2), but might account in part for the existence




    of olefin polymers and co-polymers in liquid phase products




    in the form of aerosol particles.






    Reactions (G5) and (G6) are probably unimportant at room




    temperature.  Reaction (G7) has been proposed aa the gas




    phase analog of the free radical reaction which initiates




    polymerization in liquid-phase olefin reaction, and could be




    part of a chain which yields aldehydes and ketones as




    products.
                        4-79

-------
         Reactions  (G9),  (Gil),  (G14),  and (G17)  are similar




         to (G4)  and can  account for the presence of higher molecular




         weight oxidation products.   However,  (G9) and (G10)




         probably cannot  compete with (E6) and (F5).






         Reactions  (G15)  and (G16) probably do not compete




         successfully with (G14).  Of the various hydrogen abstraction




         reactions, (G8)  is the least favored  and (G19) the most




         favored energetically.   Reaction (G21) has been suggested




         as part of a mechanism in which the hydroperoxyl radical




         was a main chain-carrying species.










8.   Reactions Between Free Radicals




     a.  Alkyl Radicals




                 R CH  + RCHCH  - R(CH)R                         (HI)
     b.  Acyl Radicals




                 See Reaction (Hll)
                                                                      (H2)
     c.  Peroxyalkyl Radicals




                 2ROO - 2RO + 0                                        (H3)
                            4-80

-------
d.  Peroxyacyl Radicals
              0      00
              ii      n  ii
            2RCOO - RCOOCR + 0-                                   (HA)


             0            0
             ii .     .    »
            RCOO + ROO - RCOOR + 02                               (H5)


             0           0
             ii .    •    ii
            RCOO + RO - RCOR + 0                                  (H6)
e.  Acylate Radicals

             0          0
             n     .    ii
            RCO + RO + RCOOR                                      (H7)

             0

            RCO + RO - RCOOH + R'CHO                              (H8)




f.  Alkoxyl Radicals


            2RO - ROOR                                            (H9)




            2RO - ROH + R'CHO                                     (H10)




            RO + RCO - ROR + CO                                   (Hll)




            RO + ROO - ROR + 02                                   (H12)




g.  Hydroxyl Radicals


            20H - H2 + 02                                         (H13)




h.  Hydroperoxyl Radicals


            2HOO - H00^ + 0,                                      (HI 4)
                        4-81

-------
  HOO + ROO - ROOH + 0                                          (1115)
  HOO + ROO - RO + OH + 02                                      (HI6


         0     0
         « •     n
  HOO + RCO - RCOH + 0-                                         (HI7)
  HOO + RO - ROH + 0                                            (HIS)
i.   Summary of Reactions Between Free Radicals


    Reactions (HI) and (H2) are negligible compared to the


    reaction with 0 , (Dl).  Reaction (H3) is possibly


    important but must compete with (D6), (E4), and (G7).


    Reactions (HA), (H5) and (H6) are, for the most part, negligible


    compared to the other reactions of peroxyacyl radicals.


    Reactions (H7) and (H8) are probably unimportant, as


    evidenced by the lack of esters in urban air.  The


    disproportionation reaction  (H10) is much faster than the


    combination reaction (H9).  Reaction  (H13) has been


    suggested as a chain termination  step in mechanisms  involving


    hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals, but is probably  un-


    important in urban air.  Of  the reactions  (H1A) to (HIS),


    the reactions most  likely r.o be of importance arc  (H1A)


    and (HIS).
                      A-82

-------
         It should be noted that radical-radical reactions, although


         in general very fast, are restricted by the low concentrations


         of radicals, which lead to low collision frequencies.




         Table 4-15 presents rate constants for some reactions


         between free radicals.




9.    Radical Decomposition Reactions


     a.  Alkyl Radicals


         No decomposition reaction.




     b.  Acyl Radicals


                 RCO(+M) = R- + CO(4M)                                 (11)




     c.  Peroxyalkyl Radicals


                 RCH200 - RCHO + OH                                    (12)
                 RCH200 - RCO + H20                                    (13)
     d.  Peroxyacyl Radicals

                  0
                  ii
                 RCOO - RO + C00                                       (14)
                             4-83

-------
             Table 4-15.  SOME FREE REACTIONS WITH FREE RADICALS.
          Reaction
                                  Rate Constant
                                  Reference
                                  .-10.34, .       . -1   -1
                                  10     liter mole  sec
                                                                      59
                                  .-10.2      9.4
                                  10     or 10
                                                                      55
                                  10
                                    9.5
                                                                      55
Cll 0  + CH 0—»-CH OOH + CH20      10
                                    9.2
                                                                      55
CH 0  + OH	"CH-OH +
                                                                      55
  -jO  + R	"-CH.OOH + olefin      10
                                    9.5
                                                                      55
CH 0 + CH
             -CH OCH
10
                                    9.8
55
     + CH,
                -0 + CH.
                I      4
10
                                    10.0
55
               -f C
                                  10
                                    9.8
                                    55
2C1M)
                                  10
                                    8.8
                                    55
                                     4-84

-------
 e.  Acylate Radicals
              0
             RCO - R- + CO-                                       (15)

 f.  Alkoxyl Radicals
             RO - R'CHO + R"-                                     (16)

 g.  Hydroxyl Radicals
     No decomposition reaction.

 h.  Hydroperoxyl Radicals
     No decomposition reaction.

i.  Summary of Radical Decomposition Reactions

    The activation energy for the decomposition of acyl radicals
    by (II) is quite high.  It is probably not fast enough to
    exclude the competing reaction of acyl radicals with 0 ,
    (D2).  Reaction  (II) might be favored by the larger acyl
    radicals.   The role of reactions (12) and (13) in urban
    air is uncertain, as is the role of reaction (14).

    There is a strong possibility that (15) is the major process
    for acylate radicals in air, particularly if they are formed
    with excess energy.  The rate of reaction (16) may be
    competitive with the rates of the reactions of alkoxyl radicals
    with NO and NO   (E10) and  (F9).
                        4-85

-------
10.   Summary of Important Reactions of Radicals





     The most important reactions by radical type are:




     1.   Alkyl radicals react almost exclusively with 0  in (Dl).




     2.   Acyl radicals probably react exclusively with 0_ in (D2).




     3.   Peroxyalkyl radicals




         a)  (D6)  may be important if the radical has access emergency.




         b)  Otherwise, (E4), (G7, G8, G9) and (F5) are likely to be




             important.




     A.   Peroxyacyl radicals probably participate in (D7), (F4),




         and (F5).




     5.   Acylate radicals probably undergo decomposition as in




         (15).




     6.   Alkoxyl radicals




         a)  (D10) can occur from photolysis of the alkyl nitrite




             from (E4).




         b)  (£10) might help to explain the oxidation decrease




             with excess NO.




         c)  (F9)  is probably occurring in most systems to some extent.




         d)  (G14) may help to explain excess rates.




         e)  (16)  may be competitive with (E9), (E10), and (F9).




         f)  Little is known about u~9) to (H12).




     7.   Hydroxyl radical reactions  are not well elucidated as




         to  relative  importance.




     8.   Hydroperoxyl  radicals probably participate  in (Fll),




         (G20), (H14), and  (HIS).




                             4-86

-------
E.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTION PRODUCTS




          The major products  '    that result from the irradiation of NO,




NO.., and various olefins in air are ozone, peroxyacyl nitrates, aldehydes,




ketones and carbon monoxide.  The minor products include epoxides, nitric acid,




alky! nitrates and nitrites, peroxy compounds, methanol and ketene.  In the




presence of sulfur dioxide, sulfuric acid is also formed.




          Some of the chemical and physical properties of these substances




are listed here to help in their detection and identification or analysis.




Some of these compounds can be recognized in the atmosphere by characteristic




odors and chemical effects even though they are present in very low concentrations.




          A short description of each compound follows, and some relevant




properties are summarized in Table 4-16.




     1.  Ozone




          Ozone is the most abundant oxidant in photochemical smog.  It is




thermodynamically unstable and highly reactive.  It is a strong oxidizing




agent, attacking rubber, textiles, plants and animal tissue.  Ozone may be




recognized by its pungent odor which resembles hay at low concentrations  (pphm




range) and the characteristic electrical arc welding odor at the ppm range.




    2.  Peroxyacyl Nitrates61' 62> 63> 64




          The peroxyacyl nitrates are a series of thermodynamically unstable




oxidants presumably formed by the combination of NO  with various peroxyacyl




radicals.  The pure compounds decompose slowly on standing at room temperature,




or explosively, under some circumstances.  Ultraviolet light also accelerates




decomposition.  They are very reactive and cause plant damage and eye irritation.






                                    4-87

-------
)F PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTION PRODUCTS.
<*_,»
CO
W
H
OH
O
oi
OH

H
3t
*— *

\O
1

^
^
ii«
vu
H












t~.
J3
•H
rH
»H
D
cr
W
U)
c
•H
rH
•H
O
PQ
OC
C
i_i
s
t-H
to
u
•rH
tn
.n
ClH

en
^
3
CJ
0)

O
z:



rH
13
U
•H
E
0)
u











Ul
n)
1
01 U
M o
OH m
0. 4-1
ctJ *0
>
•H
o oc
OH 01
Q
4-1 (J
(2
iH •
O OC
OH 01
Q
U
QJ O
4-> in
nj  CM i
1 ^""'^
I/)
u) tn
I/) Ol
0) rH 13
rH U) -H .H
p cj O 3
o O rH cr
TJ O -H
0 0 rJ

rti
r* r— t
toO O
•H S
0) ""*•••
3 0(





On rH
 ^
O 0- S5
-Red - 9.3 21 >;i atm Yellow liquid as N^
No true B.P. or M.P.
less - 92 - 21 >1 atm. Polymerizes readily
to paraformaldehyde
C rH
3 0
o to rH en
rH « O (D
PQ O O O




\jO O
0 *^ rH
O tt!
S 0 g
^H "* O
z Q fa
less - 88 53 -300mm Hg Well known lacrimatoi
d
rH iH
0 3
rH CT
O -H
U rJ




V£)
in





O
33
O
X
o
II
CM
33





C
•H
Ol
rH
O
rH
O
<
00
»
m
vD
to
to
01
r^ *O
M -H
0 3
rH CT
O -H
C.) rJ




oo
m







PI
33
0=8
CO
33
U





01
c
0
4J
01
u
<
rH
EH"
•H
CO
o
01 01
rH 13

-------













^~\
T3
Ol
3
a
•H
4-)
a
o
u
v«x
03
f~4
U
*U
a
o
tf:
OH

S-;
o
hH
H
0
<
W
erf

j
5
o
h~4
•A
o
o
H
O
EC
rVl
fH
O

CO
M
t-H
H
Crf
W
A*
O
r"v'
P-4
V*
%
o
co
.
\o
rH
1
-t

OJ
rH
.£>
fd
H
cx
E
*iH
CO
U-l
o
01
cn 01 -a
-vi
l-i
CO
g
01
a;
s •
3 cn
•H cn
U 01
J3 M C_>
-H a, o
rH in
-H • CN
3 CX
cr  cd
rH -rW
Cu X
E 0
CO V4
X 0>
M a




00
33
g
E!
00
J

f\fl
uu •
C 4J U
•H G
rH -H •
•H o oo
O (X. 01
M O

rH
,
CN
in
rH


GO
a iJ u
•H C
U -H •
f-H O 60
ai cw oi
S Q


0\
00
1



n) cj
U 01 0
•H 4-1 m
in co CM
>, 4J
nC CO 4J
(X, Cfl
)-<
CO 4J
rH JZ 01
3 00 rH
O -H O
01 o) B
rH » -C
£ B
£ 00

T3
•H
Ol 3
3 cr
rH -H
BQ J




<^
ro







rH
CO (0
O rH
•H 3
B B
01 U
J3 O
O PL,



CN
O

rH  4-)
 CX Ol
           X iw
           u  o
 8
 4-1
 CO
                     oo
o
 II
o
 II
  CN
X
u
                                    o
•H  cn
S  O

co  %
rH  O
•H  O
O  01
«  a
                                o
                                 I
                     o
                     n
                     c*1
r-
o>
1
U)
0)
a>
rH
M
O
rH
0
O
CNI
m


T3
•H
3
cr
•H
rJ


rH
m
rH
1
CO
in
01
rH
)-l
O
<-( cn
o rt
o o
CN

3u





01
G
Ol
4J
Ol
X
TD
•H
CJ
<

CJ
•H
l-l
4-1
•H
7.



o
•H
r4
3
<4-J T3
rH -H
3 CJ
co <;
                          4-89

-------
    3.   Oxides of Nitrogen, NO




          Seven known oxides of nitrogen are listed in Table 2-18.  Of these



NO  compounds, only NO and NO. are abundant in the air and of major importance
  X                          i-


in photochemical smog.  N 0  may also play a minor role by its reaction with



water to form nitric acid (HNO ).



          Nitric oxide is a colorless, odorless gas which is not a photochemical



reaction product nor an oxidant, but is a precursor in formation of nitrogen



dioxide.



          Nitrogen dioxide is an oxidizing gas that is strongly toxic to



plant and animal tissues.  It can be recognized by its brownish color and its



characteristic odor.  Although N0? itself reacts slowly as an oxidant, its



photodissociation produces oxygen atoms which, along with ozone, produce most



of the photo-oxidation products  found in smog.



    4.   Aldehydes and Ketones



          Aldehydes and ketones  are among the principal carbon-containing



products resulting from the oxidation of hydrocarbons by oxygen atoms and



ozone.   They are dissociated by  ultraviolet sunlight with the production of



tree radicals.  Formaldehyde and acrolein, among the aldehydes, are known to



cause eye irritation  in smog.  They can be oxidized slowly, mainly to



organic acids; with or without oxidation, they show a strong tendency to



polymerize and  to be  absorbed on particular, matter.
                                    4-90

-------
    5.   Carbon Monoxide




          Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless gas that is extremely toxic




at high concentrations.  It is a product of incomplete combustion in internal




combustion engines as well as a product of photochemical smog.  It is




rather  inert chemically, oxidizing to CO- very slowly upon reaction with oxygen




atoms or certain free radicals.  It is generally considered a primary




pollutant, since only relatively small concentrations can be photochemically




generated.




    6.   Nitric Acid




          Nitric acid vapor may be present in smog as a result of the reaction




of NO   with wafer.  Pure nitric acid is a colorless liquid at room temperature.




It slowly decomposes to form NO-, which in turn absorbs sunlight and hastens




decomposition.  The pure gaseous acid is a strong oxidizing agent, attacking




metals  and many organic substances.  Ultraviolet photolysis of HNO- may be a




source  of OH radicals in the atmosphere.




     7.  Sulfuric Acid




          Sulfuric acid, H.SO  , is an oily, exceedingly corrosive, nonvolatile




liquid  which results from the oxidation of sulfur dioxide in the presence of




wdter vapor.  It may play an important role in the formation of aerosols in




photochemical smog.  It is miscible in all proportions with water and is very




highly hygroscopic.  Droplets of sulfuric acid suspended in air, therefore,




grow or shrink as the relative humidity of the air increases or decreases.
                                     4-91

-------
    8.   AorosoIs



          Atmospheric particulates are mainly in the range of 0.05 to about 10A*



in size.   They are capable of acting as condensation centers.  They consist of



solid matter, droplets of solution, insoluble smokes and mineral dusts.  The

               •f        =           -     -
presence of Nli   and SO  , H_SO , Cl , N0_  and other minor components in the



solution phase have been reported, the composition varying with size and



geographical location.  Hygroscopic salts may be the origin of the ions in the



part icles.



          The relation of aerosol loading to photochemical air pollution has


                                         21               66
In en reviewed by Altshuller and Bufalini.    Mader, et al.   found



high organic loadings in atmospheric aerosols collected in Los Angeles.



Studying synthetic aerosols from irradiated mixtures containing gasoline vapor



,md nitrogen oxides in air, they found similar organic components.  Infrared



and chemical analysis of both types of aerosols showed the presence of



c.trbonyl, hydroxyl, nitrate ester, peroxy, and carboxy groups.  Renzetti and



Doyle   showed that in irradiated mixtures of auto exhaust in air, large



amounts of organic aerosols were produced.  Schuck, et al.    showed



that aeiosoJs were produced more copiously in such experiments when the exhaust



K.ISCH were derived from fuels of high olefinic content.   It  thus appears that



at least some fraction of the aerosols found in ambient photochemical  smog



i   generated by the photochemical reactions.
                                     4-92

-------
    9.  Epoxides
          Cyclic ethers such as ethylene oxide may be formed to a small extent.
Ethylene oxide is a colorless gas at 25°C.  It is a fumigant and insecticide but
not dangerously toxic to humans.
   10.  Alkyl Nitrates
          Alkyl nitrates, such as ethyl nitrate, have pleasant fruity odors.
Th
-------
toxic and highly reactive compound.   It reacts readily with such mild agents




,10 ethunol, water, ammonia, and acetic acid.   It has been suggested, but not




detected, as a product in photochemical smog.




V.  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CHEMICAL KINETICS




    1.  Rationale for Kinetic Simulation




          The classical task of chemical kinetics is the discovery of the




mechanism of n complex reaction—that is, the formulation of a set of elementary




le.ictiotiK, postulated as occurring in a reaction system, such that the observed




kinetic behavior of the components of the system can be shown to be a con-




sequence of the simultaneous occurrence of all the individual reactions of




tin' set .




          The photochemical origin of ozone and other oxidants in polluted




urban atmospheres was first recognized over twenty years ago.  Since then,




hundreds of experiments have been performed with synthetic smog, and dozens




of elementary reaction steps and partial kinetic mechanisms have been discussed.




As a  result, substantial agreement has emerged with respect to most of the




chemical principles involved, and many important aspects of the reaction




mechanism.", have been  clarified.




          Nevertheless,  the task of  theoretical interpretation of the




photochemical smog phenomenon is incomplete,  largely because of the chemical




complexity of the systems  that have  to be studied.  Most of the complex




reactions whose kinetic  behaviors have bten  successfully explained by




tradition.il methods have been found  to require mechanisms  consisting of only  a




few  elementary  reactions,  and involving  only  a  few  molecular species,  including
                                    4-94

-------
 ,             the reactants and observed products.   Indeed, it is only for



              such relatively small sets of elementary reactions that the algebra involved




              could be. analytically solved or conveniently manipulated.




+                       For example, Shepp  ,  who studied the photolysis of acetone, was




              nble to demonstrate the applicability of a mechanism involving five elementary




              reactions and eight molecular species, including one reactant, four observed




              products and three postulated free radical intermediates.  When the experimental




              conditions were restricted to temperatures above 100°C and relatively high




              light intensities, observed product concentrations were consistent with the




              algebraic expressions analytically derived from the mechanism.  Experiments




              involving intermittent light, pulsed at various intervals, permitted him




              to estimate rate constants for the individual elementary reactions, even




              though the concentrations of the free radical species were not independently




              known.   Although other reactions besides the five postulated are known to




              occur tn such systems, the investigator was able to minimize their effect




              in the system by a judicious choice of experimental conditions.




                        By contrast, dealing with the photo-oxidation of even a single




              hydrocarbon with oxides of nitrogen in air requires postulating a mechanism




              of dozens of elementary reactions.  Since each postulated reaction furnishes




              one additional differential equation to the collection, the mathematical




*              analysis needed for their simultaneous solution becomes impractical.




                        In effect,  this situation has been solved by the use of the




•             high-speed numerical  analysis capability of the modern digital computer,




              together with the accumulated body of experimental kinetic information and




                                                  4-95

-------
validated theory concerning elementary reactions of molecules, atoms and free




radicals.  Briefly, the system is to utilize the high-speed capability by




postulating a large number of elementary reactions which may be thought




important in the chemical system; to provide the computer with known or




theoretical rate constants for each, together with initial concentrations




tor all main components, and to generate therefrom (by numerical integration)




t IK- expected kinetic behavior of all the reactants, products and intermediates




known or .suspected to be present in the system.




          A particular advantage of such computerized analysis is that,  in




j.rii>cipl<-%,  it is unnecessary to make a priori judgments as to the relative




importance of alternative reaction sequences in accounting for utilization




or iormation of the participating molecular species.  Since the computer does




not develop analytical solutions to the simultaneous differential equations,




the inclusion of unnecessary elementary reactions does not interfere with the




solution process.  Consequently, if there is uncertainty  regarding  the




importance of a proposed elementary reaction, it may be investigated by




including the reaction in the set to be tested.  If the rate of occurrence




is ne^ii'^ible relative to that of other reactions in the  set, this  will




In-come apparent on examination of the behavior of the specific rates as  a




function of simulated time,  and  the reaction in question  can  then be deleted




from the set.  Thus the numerical integration routine furnishes a sort  of




automatiL correction procedure for  the elimination of unnecessary steps  from




the postulated set.




          Nevertheless, it  is undesirable to expand the set of elementary
                                    4-96

-------
rvacLions unnecessarily, since this would consume extra computing time.




    2.  The Basic Simulation Process




          When the elementary reactions which can take place in a chemical




system are known, together with their corresponding rate constants, it is a




straightforward procedure to calculate rates of change of concentration




of all reactant and product species, provided the concentrations are known




for some specified instant of time.  This is done for each species by




calculating (using equation 4-29) the rate of consumption for each elementary




reaction in which it is consumed and the rate of production for each elementary




reaction in which it is produced.  A negative sign is affixed for each of the




consumption rate terms, and the net rate of concentration change is then the




total of all the terms (with their appropriate signs).




          A systematic procedure is to list and number the individual




components of the reaction system as well as the individual elementary reactions,




then use the stoichiometric coefficients of the reactions in the form of a




matrix.  An illustration of this procedure is shown in Table 4-17.  A zero




entry at the intersection of a row and a column indicates that the component




corresponding to the column is not involved in the reaction corresponding




to the row of entry.  An entry with a positive sign indicates that the




component is produced by the elementary reaction step, while an entry with a




negative sign indicates that it is consumed.  A numerical value of j_ indicates




that only one molecule of the component in question is produced on each




occurrence of the reaction in question; if two or more such molecules arc




produced, the corresponding digit is inserted.  Similarly, -_!_ indicates that







                                    4-97

-------
   Table 4-17.   ILLUSTRATION OF MATRIX METHOD OF FORMULATING REACTION RATE EQUATION






              (Mechanism by Shepp    for photolysis of acetone)
CH,COCH, +   hw - „ CH.CO  + CH.                           ^  . k/ ,
  3    J              .>       j                             a     1



 CH  CO          - »-CH  +  CO                             k




 CH  +  CI
  et  component  i  =  CH COCH ,  2 - CH.CO ,  3 - CH3, 4 - CO , 5 - CH^ , 6 * Cl^COCH,.,
      7 = C-H COCH., 8 - C.H,
           i 5    3       2 o
Reaction
Number 1
1 -1
2 0
J -1
4 0
5 0
2
1
-1
0
0
0
System Components
3456
1
1
-1
-1
-2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
-1
0
7
0
0
0
1
0
8
0
0
0
0
]
 rl  = dCl/dt - - VR3 ' -k/lCl - VlC3
 r,  = dC,/dc =
                                  Cl + R2C2 -
                                     4-98

-------
Table 4-17.  ILLUSTRATION OF MATRIX METHOD OF FORMULATING REACTION RATE EQUATION





r4 - dC4/dt - ^ » k2C2
rr>
r, - dC,/dt - R,-R. - k,C C  - k C C,
 6     6       34    313    436
r? - dC7/dt
rg - dC8/dt
one molecule is consumed, and -2_ that  two molecules  are  consumed on  each



occurrence of the given elementary reaction step.



          From the matrix (Table 4-17) the expressions for  the  rates of the



L'lfmoniary reactions are formulated by reading  the corresponding row to



identify the reacting components (corresponding  to the columns  containing




negative stoichiometric coefficients), then multiplying  their concentrations,



each raised to the appropriate power,  together with  the  rate constant for



the reaction.  The rate of change of concentration of each  component is then



formulated by reading down the appropriate column for non-zero  entries and



adding the individual rates of the indicated  reactions,  each multiplied ty



the indicated stoichiometric coefficient  (including  the  sign).



          Mathematically this process  can be  expressed as







                            R  -fl  (S:   C  )Sij ,  J-l,...n                  (4-62)

                             J   1=1    1J
                                    4-99

-------
           where
                                            if  Sy  <  0,                         (4-63)
                                S'  - 0     if S^  > 0.                         (4-64)
           and                                   n
                                r
                                 i                 S   R  , i-1,  ...m.          (4-65)

          In these expressions R. is the instantaneous rate of the jth
elementary reaction, while r, is the net instantaneous rate of production of  the
ith component; C  is the concentration of the ith component, and S . . is  the
.stoichiomet ric coefficient for component i in reaction j.  S'  ,  as defined in
equations (4-63)  and (4-64) is the absolute value of S.  for components
consumed by the reaction only.
          In principle, the procedure within the computer is to  calculate
the rates of change of all components, use these rates to estimate  the
expected changes of concentration during a specified minute interval of
simulated time, then accordingly increment each of the concentrations pre-
viously calculated  (or specified as input).  This procedure is then  repeated
as often as necessary to reach the total desired simulated time.   In
practice it is necessary, however, to apply all possible  simplifications and
aggregations in the computation routine, to reduce computation time  and  _ost,
Consistent with reasonable accuracy in the output.
    j.  Acceptable  Simplifications
          Some of the standard simplifications  ased in chemical  kinetics
                                    4-100

-------
in deriving the mathematical consequences of assumed chemical mechanisms
are also useful in abridging the necessary input, output, or computations
required in computer simulation.
        a.  Approximate Constancy of Concentration of Components Present in
            Large Excess.
          The primary example of a component present in large excess in the
Atmospheric photochemical system is molecular oxygen, with a concentration near
200,000 ppm.  Even high concentrations of hydrocarbons in the ambient
atmosphere, say 20 ppm as carbon, if completely converted to carbon dioxide
and water, would consume far less than one thousandth of the oxygen available.
Thus the concentration of oxygen cannot change appreciably due to photochemical
reactions, and it may be treated as a constant factor in those elementary
rc,K:tions in which it occurs.  For example, in the case of the reaction
                              2NO + 0  = 2ND ,                                (4-66)
the regular rate expression is
                              R = k (N0)2(0 ).                                (4-67)
Assimilating the essentially constant value of (0~) into the rate constant
by t'ie device
                              k/ = k(02),                                     (4-68)
the rate of the elementary reaction can be more briefly expressed as
                              R = kx (NO)^.                                    (4-69)
                                    4-101

-------
          The same considerations can be applied to recombination reactions




of atoms and small radicals, where a third molecule is necessary to carry away




the t'xcess energy; for example,




                          20H + M - H202 + M                                   (4-70)




In this case, the formal rate expression is




                          R = k  (OH)2(M)                                       (4-71)




where (M) is the concentration of all unreactive molecules in the system.  Here




the rate is more simply expressed as




                          R - k'  (OH)2,                                         (4-72)




where




                          k' = k(M).                                           (4-73)




S i not- it is of little interest to compute the relatively minute  changes  of




con contrat ton of oxygen, water vapor and carbon dioxide which occur as  the




photochemical reactions proceed,  these substances may be omitted from  the




list of components in the reaction matrix, provided that appropriate




pseudo constants are calculated  for the reaction steps which involve  them.




        b.  Steady State Concentrations for Extremely Short-Lived Species




Free radicals, atoms, and various other highly reactive molecular species




tend to be consumed so  rapidly after they are formed that  their  average




period of intact existence  is very short.  More importantly, under  these




conditions their concentrations  remain always negligible relative to  the




i unceiit rat ions of the less  reactive primary contaminants.  They  remain,  in




most ij.ises, so low that ordinary experimental methods fail to detect  them;
                                    4-102

-------
yet, at the same time, the reactions in which they are produced and consumed

may proceed as rapidly as, or more rapidly than, the reactions of the less

reactive components.

          To simplify the computations involving these species, whose

exact concentrations in any event have yet to be experimentally tested, the

principle approximation used in standard kinetic analysis is that of the

"pseudo-steady state."  It is assumed that the rates of change of concentration

of siu-h species are negligible.  Then the concentration of each such component

can be derived from the rates of the individual steps.  In fact, it is found

by dividing the total rate of production by the total relative rate of con-

sumption.  Mathematically, the rate of production of component i_ is
                                rpl -    S"y V                               (4-7A,
                  where

                                S   " S   lf
                                S"  =0   if S   < 0.                          (4-76)
                  The rate of consumption is
                                r   = I  S'  Rj,                               (4-77)
                                     J-l   J
                                    4-103

-------
with s'.  defined as above (Equation 4-63) and 4-64), while the relative
rate of consumption is





                    r .  - r  ./C. - Z  01  (S'  C. )°ki)/C,.
                     ri    ci  i  jml k-1  kj  k       i
(4-78)
Tims the approximate value of the desired concentration is



                          C, - r ,/r  ..                                        (4
                           i    pi  ri







        c.  Aggregation of Free Radical Termination Steps



          Since free radicals, when they recombine, cause termination  of



radical chains, the aggregate effect  of such steps may have an  important



effect on chain lengths and, thus, on rates of product formation.  However,



the absolute rates of these reactions are relatively small because of  the



very low concentrations of the radicals; hence the formation  of recombination



products is not important relative to other routes of product formation.   To



avoid expanding the reaction set to include a large number of recombination



reactions, it  is convenient to assume that all such reactions have the same



rate constant, and thus aggregate the corresponding elementary  rate  terms



Into a single  term for each listed free-radical  component.



    4.  Photo-oxidation Simulations                                                         »



          Mechanisms of the type discussed here  have been successfully



ut i 1 izi'il in digital computer simulation of photo-oxidation kinetics  by Wayne and           *


      '/'                          73                                                        »
Ernest  " and by Westberg and Cohen  .  In the first example,  a  list  of forty





                                    4-104

-------
proposed elementary reactions served as the hypothetical mechanism, involving




as initial reactants three species (nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide and propylene)




in addition to atmospheric oxygen; nine products, in addition to carbon




dioxide and water; and fifteen intermediate species, mainly free radicals.




This list of reactions is shown in Table 4-18.




          For these forty reactions, rate constants were either taken from




the literature or estimated on the basis of modern methods in chemical kinetics




Tht- degree of success attained in simulating, with this mechanism, several




experiments in the photo-oxidation of propylene, is illustrated in Figure 4-">.




and Table 4-19.   Even without any substantial effort at fine tuning, all




simulated concentrations were within 20 percent of the experimental points,




not only for the species shown in the figure, but also for the aldehydes




produced by the photo-oxidation.
                                   4-105

-------
Taolc 4-18.   40-STEP MECHANISM FOR PHOTO-OXIDATION OF PROPYLENE




             (27 participating species underlined, excluding

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
02, H20, C02)
N02 -f hv — > NO + 0
0 -f 02 + M 	 > 03 + M
03 + NO 	 > N02 + 02
2NO + 02 	 > 2N02
N02 -f 03 	 > N03 + 02
N03 + N02 	 > N205
N03 + NO 	 * 2N02
NO + H02 	 > N02 + jOH
C2H303 + NO 	 > C2H302 + N0?
C2H3°2 + N0 	 ^ C2H3° + N02
CII^O + NO 	 >-CH3 + N02
CH 0 + NO 	 * GILO. + N00
-. J J J / 2.
CH302 + NO 	 > CH30 + N0?
C2H4°2 + N0 	 ^ CH3CHO + NO,
CH30 + 02 + NO 	 * CH302 + N02
CH3 + N02 	 > CH30 + NO
CH302 + N02 	 j» NO + 03 + CH
° + C3H6 	 *CH3 +C2H3°
°3 + C3H6 	 *• HCHO + C2H402
CH30 + C3H6 	 ^2CI!3 + c2H30
                               4-106

-------
Table 4-18. 40-STEP MECHANISM  FOR PHOTO-OXTDATTON OF  PROPYLENE  (continued)



            (27 participating  species underlined , excluding


                          °2'  H2°'  CCV




                    21.    CH 0  + C H - > CH. + CH  0 + C.H-0
                            J Z    J D        J     J     2  J


                    22.    C2H3°2 - ^ HCHO + CHO



                    23.    C2H30 + 02 - -> C2H303



                    2A .   CH3 + 02 + M  — » CH302 + M



                    25.   C2H30 + OH  — *  CH3CHO -1- 0



                    26.   CH302 -f 02 — >  03 + CH30



                    27.   .0 -»- HCHO - > OH -I- CHO



                    28.   0 + CHO — > CO  4- OH



                    29.   OH + CHO — > CO 4- H20



                    30.   CH3CHO -f OH - > CH3CO + H20



                    31.   2CH3CO - > CH3CHO + C^O
                    32.  CH30 + 02 - > CH303



                    33.  CH30 + 02 - > HCHO



                    34 .  _H + 02 - > H02



                    35.  CO + OH - -> H + C0
                    36.  20H 	> 0 + H20







                    38 •  CoHoOo ~i~ NO'j """"*""?
                    39.  CH3 + N02 - > CH3ONO
                    40.  CH3 + NO - > CH3NO
                                   4-107

-------
O O  0100
>• ?<:  u  o
       D O
 03  i
 4-1

 Ci "O
 Q)  QJ

 S "^
•H  (13


 0)  3


 X' -H
W en
                                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                                   w
                                                                                                                   H
                                                                                                                           LO

                                                                                                                            I
                                                                                                                           60
                                                                                                                           •H

                                                                                                                           En
                                                    4-108

-------
r
rf
                               Table 4-19. COMPARISON OF  SIMULATED  RESULTS WITH EXPERIMENTAL
                                                 PHOTO-OXIDATION  RUNS
                          Initial
Concentrations,
pphm
HC NO N02
100

100

200

100

100 10 sim.
exp.
100 2 sim.
(10) exp.
100 10 sim.
exp.
200 10 sim.
exp.
N02
79
85
72
85
79
80
140
150
Maxima ,
pphm
03 CH20
35
37
35
37
42
45
26
30
44
48
44
48
85
80
38
40
Half-time,
minutes
NO C3H6
30
40
30
40
25
30
63
80
115
115
115
115
90
95
145
150
                                                    4-109

-------
          A similar degree of success has been  reported by Westberg and




Cohen   in simulating the kinetics of photo-oxidation as measured in an




experiment by S chuck and Doyle.    The  comparison of measured and calculated




i.ite.s tor several components of  the  system  is  shown in Figure 4-6.  The




me eh, -ui i MII ,»s presented by the authors comprises 42 equations, but since




sev.  11!  of tlu'ue represent general reactions  of a series of radicals, the




lot.i! ii.n:.i)er of reactions involved is 68, with  more than 40 participating
          Exploration of the  effects  of  variations in the rate parameters




which were subject  to estimation  showed  only four to which the simulated




ivites wen' significantly sensitive.   These  were as follows:




              R()7« + NO = RO.  +  NO





              H09* f RO • =  ROOH  +  0
               (CH1CO)0? + N02  *  (CH3CO)OON02
 (A:, between the  last  two  of  these reactions, only the ratio of the rates was




 . ip,ii i 1 i can t . )




          The  calculations  further indicated a strong possibility that




 carbon monoxide  could play  an important role in converting nitric oxide




  • :i i 11•.',,'.( :i dioxide  and  in  generating c^cne ^n a polluted atmosphere.
                                     4-110

-------
                  Experimental

                  Simulated
             20
40
60
80
100
                              TIME, MINUTES
Figure 4-6.   TIME-DEPENDENCE OF CONCENTRATIONS IN SIMULATED PHOTO-OXIDATION
             OF ISOBUTENE, COMPAREQ TO EXPERIMENT.  FROM CURVES PRESENTED
             BY WESTBERG AND COHEN
                                   73
                                4-111

-------
                                 REFERENCES





 I.   L.'itfhton, P. A., "Photochemistry of Air  Pollution,"  Academic Press,




     Now York,   1961.




     divert, J. G., Pitts, J. N., Jr., "Photochemistry," John  Wiley and




     Sous,  Inc., New York, New York,  1966.




     II.ill,  T. C., Jr., Blacet, F. E. , J. Chem.  Phys. ,  20, 1745, 1952.




 it.   Khun,  A. V., Pitts, J. N. ,  Jr.,  Smith, E.  B. ,  Environ.  Sci.  Tech. ,  1,




     8, 656,  1967.




 S.   PUts, J. N. ,  Jr., Khan, A. V.  Smith, E.  B., Wayne,  R.  P.,




     Knviron. Sci.  Tech.,  3^  3,  241,  1969.




 h.   MrNf.shy , .1. R. , Okabe, H. ,  "Vacuum Ultraviolet Photochemistry,"




     Advaiu-fs in Photochemistry, Vol.  Ill, ed.,  by W. A. Noyes,  Jr.,




     (',. S.  Hammond,  and J. N.  Pitts,  Jr.,  Interscience Publishers, a




     division of John Wiley and  Sons, New  York, 1964,  page 157.




 7.   Pitts, J. N.,  Jr.,  Sharp, J. H. , Chan, S.  I.,  J.  Chem.  Phys., 30,




     238,  1963;  Ibid. 40_,  3655,  1964.




 8.   Metropolis, N., Beutler,  H., Phys.  Rev.,  57,  1078,  1940.




 9.   Dainton, F. ,  S.,  Ivin, K. J.,  Trans,  Faraday Soc., 46,  374,  382, 1950.




10.   Reynolds, W.  C. , Taylor,  W. H., J.  Chem. Soc. , 1912, page 13.




11.   ,lu!fe, S.,  Ford, H. W. ,  J.  Phys.  Chem. ,    71,  1832,  1967.




12.   Gr.iv,  P., Yoffe, A. D. ,  Roselaar,  L. . T'rans.  Faraday Soc.  , 51, 1489, 1955.




i <.   iUiwn, li. W. ,  Primetel,  G.  C. ,  J.  Chem.  Phys. ,  29,  883,  1958.




i ,.   NI.no I sou,  A.  J.  C.,  Nature,  190,  143,  1961.






                                     4-112

-------
15.    Rebbert, R.  E.,  Slagg, N. , Bull Soc. Chim. Beiges^ 71, 709, 1962.




16.    Rubin, T. R.,  Calvert, J. G., Rankin, G. T., MacNevin, W. M.,




      J.  Am. Chem. Soc. ,  _?!» 2850, 1953.




17.    Frost, A. A.,  Pearson, R. G., "Kinetics and Mechanism," 2nd edition,




      John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p. 241-259, 1961.




18.    Rice, F. 0., Herzfeld, K. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 5jj, 284, 1934.




19.    Leighton, P. A., "Photochemistry of Air Pollution," Academic Press,




      New York, 1961.




20.    Wayne, L. G.,  "The Chemistry of Urban Atmospheres," Technical Progress




      Report, Volume III, Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District,




      December, 1962.




21.    Altshuller,  A.  P.,  Bufalini, J. J., Photochem. and Photobiol.. 4., 97, 1965.




22.    Stephens, E. R., Int. J. Air Water Poll., 1CI, 649, 1966




23.    Haagen-Smit, A.  J., Wayne, L. G., "Air Pollution," Volume I, 2nd ed. ,




      A.  C. Stern, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1968.




24.    Johnston, H. S., NSRDS-NBS 20, Sept. 1968.




25.    Schott, G.,  Davidson, N., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 1841, 1958.




26.    DeMore, W. B.  International Journal of Chemical Kinetics,  l^, 209, 1969.




27.    Klein, F. S.,  Herron, J. T., J. Chem., Phys.,  41, 1285, 1964.




28.    Ford, H. W.  , Endow, H. , J. Chem. Phys..   2_7, 1156, 1277, 1957.




29.    Johnston, H. S. , Yost, D. M. , J. Chem. Phys. ,  17., 386, 1949




30.    Klein, R., Scheer,  M. D., J. Phys. Chem. ,  _7_3» 1598, 1969




31.    Ford, H. W., Doyle, G. J., Endow, N., J. Chem. Phys.. 26, 1337,  1957.
                                    4-113

-------
\JL.    Wayne, L. G., Yost, D. M. , J. Chem. Phys. ,  l^_,  41,  1951.




jt.    Tuesday, C. A., "Chemical Reactions in  the  Lower and Upper Atmosphere,"




      R. D. Cndle, Ed., Interscience, New York,  1961.




Vt.    .laffo, S. , Klein, F.  S. , Trans. Faraday Soc.,  62, 2150, 1966.




r,.    Kaufman, F., Proc. Roy. Soc. A.,  247,  123,  1958.




it,.    Cv. i.movir, R. J., Can. J. Chem. ,  38_,  10,  1681,  1960.




(/.    f.v.-t auovie, R. J., J. Chem.  Phys. ,  33,  4,  1063,  1960.




) 191, 1969.




'i 1 .    CvL'tanovic, R. J., Advan. Photochem. ,   JL.,  115-182-1963.




.'»:..    Vrbaski, T. , Cvetanovic,  R.  J. , Can. J. Chem. .  28, 1053, 1063, 1960, Ozonolysis




.'( i.    CadU>, R. D. , Shadt,  C.,  J.  Chem.  Phys., 21,  163, 1953.




.'(4.    llaiiht , 1'. L. , Stephens, E. R. , Scott,  W. E. ,  Doerr, R. E. , 136th Meeting




      of iho Amer. Chem. Soc.,  Atlantic City, September 1958.




AS.    Saltzm.-m, B. E. ,  Gilbert, N. ,  Ind.  Eng. Chem. ,   51, 1415, 1959.




A6.    Haagtm-Smit, A. J., Bradley, W. E.,  Fox, M. M., Ind. Eng. Chem., 45,




      208b, 1953.




A 7.    Cladle, R. D. , "Proceedings of  the Conference on Chemical Reactions  in




      Urban Atmospheres," Report No.  15, Air Pollution Foundation.




      San Marino,  California, November  1956.




 ,^.    IK huek,  h. A.,  Doyle, G.  J., Endow,  N., "A Progress Report on  the




      l'h..i orhcmi.st ry  of Polluted Atmospheres," Report No. 31, Air  Pollution




      1 .Mniu.it i on ,  San Marino,  California,  December 1960.



                                     4-114

-------
49.  Taylor, R. P., Blacet, F. E., Ind. Eng. Chem.,  4£, 9, 1505, 1956.




50.  Schuck, E. A., Doyle, G. J., "Photooxidation of Hydrocarbons in




     Mixtures Containing Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur Dioxide," Report No. 29,




     Air Pollution Foundation, San Marino, California, October 1959.




51.  Stephens, E. R.,  in "Chemical Reactions in the Lower and Upper Atmosphere,"




     R. D. Cadle, Ed., Interscience, New York, 1961.




52.  Hanst, P. L., Calvert, J. G. , J. Phys.  Chem.. j>3, 1, 104, 1969.




53.  McMillan G. R., Calvert, J. G., Oxidation Combust. Rev., !_, 83, 1965.




54.  McKellar, J. F. ,  Norrish, R. G. W., Proc. Roy. Soc. ,   London, A263, 51, 1961.




55.  Heicklen, J., "Reactions of Alkylperoxy and Alkoxy Radicals,"




     International Oxidation Symposium, San Francisco, California,




     August 28 - September 1, 1967.




5(>.  Calvert, J. G. , Hanst, P. L. , Can. J. Chem. .  _37, 1671, 1959.




57.  Sleppy, W. C., Calvert, J. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. .  81, 769, 1959.




58.  Birss, F. E., Danby, D. J., Hinshelwood, C., Proc. Roy. Soc.   (London),




     A239, 154, 1957.




59.  McMillan, G. R. ,  Wijnen, M.H. J. , Can. J. Chem. ,  J16_, 1227, 1958.




60.  Leighton, P. A.,  "Chemical Reactions in the Lower and Upper Atmosphere,"




     Interscience Publishers, N. Y., 1960, pp 1-14.




61.  Stephens, E. R.,  Darley, E. F., Taylor, 0. C., Scott, W. E.,




     "Photochemical Reaction Products in Air Pollution."  Proc. Am. Patrol.




     Inst., ^0, III, 1960.




62.  Stephens, E. R.,  Anal. Chem.,  36, 928, 1964.




63.  Darley, E. F., Kettner, K. A., Stephens, E. R.. Anal. Chem.. 35. 589, 1963.
                                    4-115

-------
64.   Stephens,  E.  R.,  Burleson, F.  R.,  Cardiff, E. A., APCA Journal,  15,




     87, 1965.




dri.   Mason, B.  J., in  "Chemical Reactions in the Lower and Upper Atmosphere,"




     Interscience  Publishers, N. Y., 1961, pp 197-218.




(if).   Mader, P.  P., MacPhee, R. D. , Lofberg, R. T. , and Larson, G. P.




     I'l'l-  'in_8jL Chem.  4^, 1352 (1952)




67.   Rt-nzftti,  N.  A.,  Doyle, G. J., Int. J. Air Water Poll. ,  2., 327, 1960.




68.   Schuck, E. A., Ford, H. W., and Stephens, E. R. , Report No. 26,




     Air Pollution Foundation, San Marino, California (October 1958).




69.   "The Oxides of Nitrogen in Air Pollution," State of California,




     Department of Public Health, Bureau of Air Sanitation, January 1966.




70.   Schuck, E. A., and Doyle, G. J., "Photo-oxidation of Hydrocarbons in




     Mixtures Containing Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur Dioxide,"




     Report No. 29, Air Pollution Foundation, San Marino, California, 1959.




71.   Shepp, A., J. Chem. Phys.. 24_, 939, 1956.




II.   Wayne, L.  G., and Ernest, T. E., "Photochemical Smog Simulated by




     Computer," paper 69-15, presented at 62nd Annual Meeting of the Air




     Pollution Control Association, New York, June 1969.




73.   Westberg, K., and Cohen, N.,  "The Chemical Kinetics of Photochemical




     Smog, as Analyzed by Computer," Report No. ATR-70  (8107)-!, The




     Aerospace Corporation, El  Segundo, California, December 1969.
                                     4-116

-------
                                CHAPTER 5



                           AIR QUALITY APPRAISAL








                                                                         Page




A.  INTRODUCTION                                                         5-10




B.  GENERAL SAMPLING AND STANDARDIZATION METHODS                         5-11




C.  NON-NITROGENOUS OXIDANTS                                             5-14




    1.  "Net Oxldant" Concept                                            5-14




    2.  Standards                                                        5-15




    3.  Total Oxidant Measurement Techniques                             5-17




        a.  Colorimetric KI                                              5-17




        b.  Coulometric                                                  5-18




        c.  Coulometric vs. Colorimetric Methods                         5-18




        d.  Other Methods                                                5-20




            1)  Alkaline KI                                              5-20




            2)  Acid KI                                                  5-20




            3)  Phenolphthalin                                           5-21



            4)  Miscellaneous                                            5-21




D.  SPECIFIC OZONE METHODS                                               5-21




    1.  Chemiluminescence                                                5-21




    2.  Rubber Cracking                                                  5-22




    3.  Ultraviolet Photometry                                           5-22




    4.  Other Methods                                                    5-23
                                      5-1

-------
ii.  OXIDES OF NITROGEN




    1.   Standards




    2.   Colorimetric Methods




    3.   Other Methods




K.  OASIXHIS ORGANIC POLLUTANTS




    I.   Total Hydrocarbons




        a.  Flame lonization Analyzers




        1).  Spectrostopic Methods




    2.   Hydrocarbons by Type




        a.  Gas Chroraatography




        I).  Spcctrometric Method




        i-.  Miscellaneous Methods




    3.   Oxygenated Gaseous Organic Methods




        a.  General Method




        !..  Bisulfate Method




        i'.  Other Condensation Reagents




G.  PKROXYACYL NITRATES




    1.   Long Path Infrared Spectroscopy




    2.   Gas Chromatography




II.  AEROSOLS AND ATMOSPHERIC TURBIDITY




    1.   Particulate Collection Methods
5-23




5-23




5-24




5-25




5-25




5-25




5-25




5-27




5-27




5-27




5-28




5-28




5-28




5-28




5-29




5-29




5-30




5-30




5-31




5-31




5-31
                                      5-2

-------
        a.  General Properties of Photochemical Aerosols                 5-31




        b.  Filtration                                                   5-32




        c,  Inertial Collection                                          5-33




        d.  Electrostatic Precipitation                                  5-34




        e.  Thermal Precipitation                                        5-34




    2.  In Situ Aerosol Analyzers                                        5-34




        a.  Photometric                                                  5-34




        b.  Condensation Nuclei Counters                                 5-36




I.  BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS                                                5-36




    1.  Bacterial Response                                               5-36




    2.  Plant Damage                                                     5-37




    3.  Sensory Irritation                                               5-37




J.  AIR QUALITY DATA                                                     5-38




    1.  Methods of Expressing Air Quality                                5-40




    2.  Typical Concentration Patterns in Photochemical                  5-45




        Air Contaminants.




        a.  Diurnal Variations                                           5-46




        b.  Seasonal Variations                                          5-55



    3.  Ozone vs. Oxidant Measurements                                   5-58




    4.  Observed Contaminant Concentrations                              5-72




        a.  Oxidant                                                      5-72




        b.  Nitrogen Oxides                                              5-78
                                      5-3

-------
                                                                         Page




            1)   Series Flow                                              5-78




            2)   Parallel (Mod.  1)                                         5-78




            3)   Parallel (Mod.  2)                                         5-79




        c.   Hydrocarbons                                                 5-84




        d.   PAN                                                          5-92




        c.   Aldehydes                                                    5-96




    5.   Trends  in Photochemical Air Contaminants                         5-99




K.   DATA ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS  FOR DETERMINING REGIONAL               5-109




    AIR QUALITY




    1.   Suggested Measurements                                           5-109




    2.   Sampling Network Design                                          5-110




    J.   Station Siting                                                   5-115




    4.   Data Processing and Validation                                   5-116
                                      5-4

-------
                                 CHAPTER 5




                              LIST OF FIGURES









Figure                                                                   Page




 5-1        Apparatus for Dynamic Calibration                            5-16




 5-2        Comparison of Data Resulting from Three                      5-42




            Sampling Approaches.




 5-3        Diurnal Oxidant Concentrations, Pomona, California,          5-44




            September 1966.




 5-4        Concentrations of Pollutants—Los Angeles, California        5-47




 5-5        Diurnal Variation in Oxidant and NO,, Concentrations          5-'jO




 5-b        Diurnal Variation of Total Oxidant Levels—                  5-5)




            Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, August 6, 1966.




 5-7        Oxidant Monthly Mean Hourly Average Concentrations—         5-52




            October 1965.




 5-8        Carbon Monoxide Monthly Mean Hourly Average                  5-54




            Concentrations—October 1965.




 5-9        Oxidant Concentration by Month (Mean of all Hours)           5-56




 5-10       Oxidant Concentration by Month (Mean of Maximum Hours)       5-57




 5-11       Mean Monthly NO Concentrations                               5-59




 5-12       Mean Monthly NO. Concentrations                              5-60




 5-13       Comparison of Ozone and Oxidant Monthly Mean of Hourly       5-^4




            Average Concentrations—Los Angeles and Pasadena,




            1964-1965.
                                      5-5

-------
Vigurc                                                                   Page



 'j-14       Comparison of Ozone and Oxidant Monthly Mean of              5-65



            Maximum Hourly Concentrations—Los Angeles and



            Pasadena, 1964-1965.



 5-15       Comparison of Ozone, Oxidant and Oxidant Adjusted for        5-66



            N0« and SO,, Response—Los Angeles and Pasadena, July 1964.



 5-Lh       Average Ozone Concentrations by Hour                         5-70



 5-17       Diurnal Variation of Ozone Concentration in Philadelphia     5-71



            and Denver.



 !>-18       Nonmethane/Methane  Hydrocarbons Ratios—Cincinnati and       5-86



            Los Angeles  (1964).



 r>-19       Oxidant and  PAN Concentrations by Hour of Day—Downtown      5-93



            Los Angeles—(1965).



 r>-20       Oxidant and  PAN Concentrations by Hour of Day Air            5-94



            Pollution Research  Center—Riverside, California—(1966).



 S-21       Oxidant and  PAN Concentrations Air  Pollution Research        5-97



            Center—Riverside,  Califorria—(June 1966 Through



            June 1967, Inclusive).



 •>-22a      Monthly Mean Daily  Maximum NO  , Civic Center, 1957-1961.     5-102
                                         X


            Significant  Trend,  +8.6 pphm/Year.



 r)-22b      Trend Curves Fitted to "Deseasonalized" Monthly Mean         5-102



            Daily Maximum NO  Data, Los Angeles Civic Center, Stations
                            X


            I and 58, 1957-1961.
                                      5-6

-------
Figure
 5-23a      Monthly Mean Daily Maximum NO ,  Burbank, 1957-1961.           5-103
                                         A


            No Significant Trend.



 5-23b      Trend Curves Fitted to "Deseasonalized" Monthly Mean         5-103



            Daily Maximum NO  Data, Burbank, Station 9, 1957-1961.



 5-24       Oxidants                                                     5-104



 5-25       Nitrogen Dioxide                                             5-105



 5-26       Annual Variation in Number of Days Oxidant and N07           5-107



            Exceed Stated Levels Together with Number of Days



            Conducive to Accumulation of Air Contaminants — Los



            Angeles Basin.



 5-27       Factors to Consider in the Development of an Overall         5-113



            Air Quality Appraisal Implementation Plan.
                                     5-7

-------
Tabit
                                 CHAPTER 5




                              LIST OF TABLES
            Effect of NO- Oxidant Determination in Absence of Ozone      5-19
 5-2        Oxidant Concentrations Adjusted for Nitrogen Dioxide         5-62




            Response Monthly Means of Hourly Average Concentrations,




            ppm.




 5-3        Oxidant Concentration Adjusted for Nitrogen Dioxide          5-63




            Response Monthly Means of Daily Maximum Hourly Average




            Concentrations.




 5-4        Cumulative Hourly Average Oxidant Concentrations (1964-      5-73




            1965).




 5-5        Oxidant Concentrations (1964-1965)                           5-74




 5-6        Highest Monthly Mean Oxidant Concentrations (1964-1965)      5-76




 5-7        Total Oxidant Concentrations Exceeding Selected Levels       5-77




            (1967-1968.




 5-8        Cumulative Frequency Distributions of 5-Minute Values —      5-80




            Nitric Oxide and Nitrogen Dioxide (1966 CAMP).




 5-9        Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Hourly Average          5-81




            Concentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide and Nitrogen




            Oxides (1967 SCAN).
                                      5-8

-------
Table                                                                    Page




 5-10       Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Hourly Average          5-82




            Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (1967 New York-




            New Jersey).




 5-11       Average Hydrocarbon Composition—218 Los Angeles             5-87




            Ambient Air Samples (1965).




 5-12       Average and Highest Concentration Measured for Various       5-88




            Aromatic Hydrocarbons.




 5-13       Average Atmospheric Light Hydrocarbon Concentrations—       5-89




            Downtown Los Angeles—(Fall 1967).




 5-14       Comparison of Results from the Ultraviolet Irradiation       5-91




            of Ambient Air Samples.




 5-15       Average and Maximum Concentration of PAN—Riverside,         5-95




            California—(August 1967-April 1968).




 5-16       Range of Maximum Concentrations of Aldehydes and             5-98




            Formaldehyde—Los Angeles County—(1951-1957).




 5-17       Summary of Total Oxidant Concentrations Recorded at          5-106




            Camp Sites, 1964-1967.
                                     5-9

-------
A.  INTRODUCTION




          Air quality appraisal consists of the measurement of contaminants




in the atmospheric photochemical pollution system and/or their indicators to




assess temporal and spatial air quality profiles in a given region.  Measure-




ment of air quality is constrained by costs and technical feasibility in




terms of the design, performance and geographical deployment of sensors,




operational and maintenance requirements and the representative sampling




that may be required to give valid results in any region.  Because of these




considerations, an "optimized," i.e., cost-effective, strategy to appraise




photochemical (as well as nonphotochemical) air quality is required.  The




considi-rations involved in the development of an implementation plan are




discussed in paragraphs J. and K. of this chapter.




          A cost-effective air quality appraisal plan is based, initially, on




an analysis of current and prospective technical requirements, and costs and




benefits are compared in order to select the sensors and sensor systems that




are most preferred in meeting these requirements.  An optimum plan would




probably lead to applying measurements to carefully selected key contaminants




which, when coupled with the measurement of selected environmental parameters




(winds, mixing height, solar radiation), yield the greatest amount of




interpretive information and the greatest degree of verification and




predictability within the resources available.
                                     5-10

-------
          The interaction of numerous reactants under'irradiation in the




photochemical system leads to a large number of intermediates and products,




many of which are themselves capable of entering into the reaction sequence to




some degree.  Even in the most simplified synthetic smog systems the estimation




of concentrations of all products as they vary with time has been an immense




task.  Only certain components can be practically measured in the atmosphere,




some of these with great effort.  Nevertheless, this assay is possible and is




necessary to show clearly the nature of any given photochemical air pollution




system.  Suitable techniques for estimating the concentrations of contaminants




in terms of the state-of-the-art and current consensus are described in the




following paragraphs.




B.  GENERAL SAMPLING AND STANDARDIZATION METHODS




          The data necessary to determine the air quality in a region should




be adequate enough to cover the region spatially and frequent enough over




sufficiently protracted time periods to show normal fluctuations.  The number




of observations that may be required, therefore, is large enough to make




automatic analysis preferable to manual, where available.  Although automatic




equipment is more expensive initially, its much lower requirements in man-hours




per sample period soon compensate for initial costs.  Manual methods are still




needed, however, for (1) calibration, (2) management of special short-term




sampling problems, and (3) situations in which automatic methods exist.  These




problems have been recently reviewed.
                                     5-11

-------
          Sampling an air pollutant usually involves moving a measured amount


ot air through or into a scrubber or collector.  The inlet tube is sized


a<. cording to flow rate and must not absorb or react with the pollutant to be


measured.  Usually glass, stainless steel or certain plastics such as


polyethylene or Teflon are used, depending on the pollutant.  In a grouping


oi several analyzers, a common manifold with a tube to each analyzer is


customary.  The air is moved by means of a pump.  To avoid contamination by


pump oil or other pump components, a vacuum pump is ordinarily placed down-


stream from the collector.  If the pump must be used upstream with positive


pressure, it should be of a type in which components coming into contact with


the sample are inert towards the pollutant.


          Measurement of the sample is done either by timing the flow at a


measL-red flow rate or by measuring the total sample volume.  Flows are


conveniently measured by pressure drop across a constriction in the inlet

                                        2
(such as a capillary, hypodermic needle,  or nozzle) or by a rotameter.  Either


ot those types should be calibrated against a volume-measuring device such as


a wet or dry test meter, and the flow checked frequently for steadiness during


the sampling period.  Automatic analyzers with liquid reagents also require


steady flow in one or more liquid streams, usually gauged with rotameters.


          Calibration at periodic intervals is required for either manual or


automatic methods.  It may be dynamic or static.  Dynamic calibration involves


passing  the pollutant in air into the system at realistic concentrations as  if


it were  an actual sample.  This may be fairly difficult because of the very
                                      5-12

-------
low concentrations of pollutants, and the reactivity or condensability of


some of them.  Specific cases are discussed below as they arise.


          Various gas dilution systems have been described.   A fairly simple

                                                 4
method recently developed is the permeation tube,  suitable for pollutants


which may be passed through the walls of a tube of a specific plastic at a slow rate


which depends on the surface area and the temperature.  To generate a known


dynamic concentration, air is passed over the tube in a thermostatted vessel.


The tube may be calibrated-gravimetrically if held at .constant temperature,


and the permeation rate remains constant as long as appreciable liquid remains


inside.  Another technique is to add a measured amount of pollutant to a known


fixed volume of air in a large vessel.  The addition may be made by syringe


injection or by crushing a weighed glass ampoule containing the pollutant.  If


the vessel is rigid it must be large relative to the amount of sample to be


withdrawn.  Bags made of plastics such as Mylar or Tedlar  may be used for this


purpose, and have the advantage of collapsing as the sample is withdrawn.


          In static calibration a standard solution of the pollutant, a


substance which will generate the pollutant, or the final reaction product may


be used.  Quantitative dilutions to various levels are made and the appropriate


later stages of the determination are made, omitting the gas-contacting step.


Static methods are inherently capable of better control and precision than


dynamic methods, but give no indication of gas absorption or r action


efficiencies.  Occasionally samples must be returned to a central laboratory


for analysis.  The form in which they are transported must be chosen so that
                                      5-13

-------
they do not deteriorate in storage or transit.   Some may be absorbed in the




appropriate reagent, others must be kept in gas form.  For the latter purpose,




evacuated glass vessels or plastic bags are sometimes used.




          For condensable pollutants a freeze-out technique may be used.  The




air is passed through a trap immersed in a cold bath (ice, dry ice, or liquid




air) suitable for condensing the materials of interest.  Sometimes the trap




is packed with an inert solid absorbent.  Later the trap is connected to the




detector and warmed up to volatilize the sample.  In this method the normal




large quantities of water vapor in air also condense.  The water can




sometimes be removed by a drying agent if the pollutant of interest is not also




at fee ted as a result.




C.  NON-NITROGENOUS OXIDANTS




    •!••  "Net Oxidant" Concept




          Total oxidants in air may be defined as compunds that will oxidize




a reference material which is not capable of being oxidized by atmospheric




oxygen.  Methods which measure oxidants, therefore, involve exposing a




reference substance to a sample of ambient air, and determining the degree of




oxidation which has occurred.  This is done in different ways, depending on




the reference substance chosen.  The following factors should be considered:




        a.  Ambient air contains a mixture of oxidizing and reducing




compounds—ozone, nitrogen dioxide, peroxaycetyl nitrate  (PAN), sulfur dioxide,




hydrogen sulfide, aldehydes, unsaturated hydrocarbons, and others.




        h.  The concentrations of these compounds may be constantly varying




within relatively wide limits—from 0-2 rag/m   (0-3 ppm as  ozone).






                                      5-14

-------
          Since reducing compounds in air have an opposite effect on the


reference material—that is, a decrease in the degree of observed oxidation—


the result obtained by potassium ioxide (KI) methods (see paragraph 3. below),


unless empirical corrections are made, is a "net" oxidant value rather than


a total one.   The net value thus describes a condition of the air, rather


than a specific compound concentration.  For this reason, concentrated


efforts are being made by researchers to obtain measurements for each specific


oxidant present.  Hopefully, these efforts will enable air pollution


scientists to better define this atmospheric "condition."


          Most oxidant data which have been collected are net determinations,


and a high correlation between these values and other pollutant levels has


been observed.   Consequently, until the more promising methods become


routinely available, "net" determinations must serve as indicators of total


oxidant levels.


    2.  Standards


          For dynamic calibration ozone may be generated in the air stream


either by glow discharge or by irradiation with a germicidal ultraviolet lamp.


Since neither method offers a precisely known ozone concentration, determination

                                       o
by manual absorption train is required.   Usually potassium iodide reagent is


used and is assayed colorimetrically or by titration with thiosulfate.  Electric


discharge in air may produce some oxides of nitrogen.  These should be


measured by a separate method, since the oxidant method is sensitive to them.


The influence of these contaminants can be negated by generating the ozone in


a stream of pure oxygen instead of air.  Figure 5-1 illustrates this procedure.
                                     5-15

-------
II
                 E
                 m o
                 D <
                 CD >
                  u
.
                               CC C-
    1
     o
     u.

                                              U.
              UJ H


              §§
              N ^
              O u-1
                                   cc -r
                                   UJ
                                   O o
                                   OC tM
                                                        am
                                                       
-------
          Except for nitrogen dioxide and peroxyacyl nitrates, which are


treated separately below, there is little experience in dynamic calibration


with other oxidants.  They are calibrated with static procedures.  Hydrogen


peroxide is available in reagent grade and may be standardized by conventional


titrimetric methods.  Certain other peroxides such as t-butylhydro-peroxide,


di-t-butyLperoxlde, or peracetic acid are available in reasonable purity and


aie used to represent the whole class of their homologs, many of which an.-


unstable and not readily available.


    3.   Tola I Oxidant Measurement Techniques


        a,  Co Lor imejtr ic KI


          Continuous analysis of total oxidants is most commonly accomplished


with instrumentation using neutral buffered potassium iodide as the


absorbing medium.  In devices using a coloriraetric method, sample air is


passed at a known rate through a liquid-absorbing reagent with a vacuum pump


arrangement.  Oxidants in contact with the KI react to free iodine and the


tri-iodine ion.  These are determined colorimetrically in a continuous flow


colorimeter at 352 mu.  The continuous instrumental method is extremely


.sensitive to oxidizing substances and is suitable for determinations in the

                     3
0-05 ppm (0-1  mg 0,/m )  range, with a sensitivity of about 0.005 ppm


(.Olmg/m ) as ozone.  The negative interference caused by SO,, is often reduced


by passing the air sample over CrO^ scrubbers, but this technique has not been


wholly successful, primarily because of the effects of humidity on the scrubber

                                               9
.•>vsicn)s, oftentimes rendering them ineffective.   Better methods for


eliminating SO. interference are critically needed.
                                     5-17

-------
        b.  Coulometric



          In these devices, which are also widely used for measurement of     ;



oxidants, sample air is passed in a manner similar to the colorinetrie type



of instrument into an electrolytic detector cell containing potassium



iodide.    The free iodine liberated by the oxidants is reduced at the cathode



of the cell, causing a current flow through an external circuit.  The current



flow is proportional to the amount of iodine liberated and, in turn, to the



oxidants entering the solutions.  The current is measured with a microammeter

                                           3

usually calibrated directly in pphm or mg/m  of ozone.



        c.  Coulometric vs. Colorimetric Methods



          Since these general types of instruments are the most widely used



for oxidant measurements, numerous studies have been conducted comparing the



results obtained with the two approaches.  Field comparisons of colorimetrie



and Coulometric oxidant analyzers Indicate differences would be no greater



than those of two colorimetric analyzers working side-by-side.    Comparative



data show a correlation coefficient of 0.87 between readings of the two



different instruments, both calibrated with respect to known ozone streams.  In



this study, however, this coefficient was the result of a least squares fit



and in some Instances, the agreement betw  >n the two methods was poor.


                                12
          In another field study   the two methods agreed within their respective



degrees of precision after correction for NO. responses.



          Analyzers utilizing other principles of detection vary !.t their



sensitivity to NO,.  As shown in Table 5-1, the Coulometric cell analyzers
                                     5-18

-------
Table 5-1.   EFFECT OF NO  OXIDANT DETERMINATION IN ABSENCE OF  OZONE.
NO- Concentration
Range Tested
ppm* in air
> 0 to 36
1.5 to 5.5
2.0
> 0 to 1
0.24 to 0.43
2.0
2.0
Conditions
1% KI, pH 7
bubbler
2% KI, pH 7
bubbler
10% KI, pH 7
contact column
20% KI, pH 7
contact column
20% KI, pH 7
contact colurcn
coulombic cell
U. V. photometer
Response
Percent
. of N0'2
Concentration
8 to 11
6.4
21
30
12 to 47
average : 25
10
2
Reference
13
14
15
13
16
15
15
    *Based on 4-liter sample,
                                 5-19

-------
register about 10 percent of the NO. concentration as ozone and the UV



photometer device shows the least interference from NO-.



          Perhaps the largest variations between the methods are obtained



because of the differences in reagent formulation.  Generally, 10- or 20-



percent KI solutions are used in colorimetric instruments, and at these



concentrations, response to NO. is higher than at the 2- percent level used



with coulometric instruments.  Studies comparing the two methods indicate that



both must be checked and calibrated often and that variations are usually



caused by changes occurring in air or reagent flow, and by interfering



compounds.



        d.  Other Methods



            1)  Alkaline KI



          This method   is intended for the manual determination of oxidants


                                3                         3
in the range of a few pphm (mg/m ) to about 20 ppm (40mg/m ).  The advantage



of this procedure over the neutral iodide technique is that a delay between



sampling and completion of analysis is allowed.  Sampling is conducted in



midget impingers containing 1 percent KI in 1 N sodium hydroxide.  Because of



the preferred reference neutral-buffered method, however, the alkaline



procedure is not widely used.



            2)  Acid KI



          This procedure was reported recently   to give good color stability,



no SO ? interference, and good agreement with results by neutral-brffered KI



methods.  It has not yet been widely tested.
                                      5-20

-------
            3)  Phenolphthalin

                     18
          This method   is based on the oxidation of the colorless phenolphthalin


to phenolphthalein, which is pink in alkaline solution by atmospheric oxidant.


Because the method is sensitive to pH and temperature variation, it is no


longer widely used.



            4)  Miscellaneous


          The specificities of several colorimetric reagents to various oxidant


species have been evaluated.  They offer the means, when needed, for


distinguishing among most of the oxidant classes to be expected in photochemical


air pollution.  Methods specific for ozone are discussed in the next paragraph.


D.  SPECIFIC OZONE METHODS


    1.  Chemiluminescence



          A chemiluminescent method originally developed by Regener for use in


balloon sondes  *   has been adapted for use in surface measurements.  A small


pump aspirates air in the dark across the surface of a fluorescent substance


(rhodamine B absorbed on silica gel) while the material is scanned with a


photomultiplier tube.  An inlet trap of desiccant eliminates moisture.  The


reaction is highly specific to ozone.  Responses to N0_, S0~ and PAN appear


to be negligible.  However, the reaction is not stoichiometric and requires a


timer to alternate flows of ambient air and clean air which has passed over


a calibrated ultraviolet ozone generator lamp.
                                      5-21

-------
                                                                     21
          For several weeks the chemiluminescence method was compared   with



colortmetric and coulometrlc KI analyzers In measurements on Los Angeles smog.



It generally (but with some exceptions) read lower than the colorimetric



analyzer.  This very promising method is still being evaluated.



    2.  Rubber Cracking



          The earliest technique used to identify ozone in ambient air was


                                                      22
based on the rapid cracking of stressed rubber strips.    A strip of a



suitable rubber is bent double, tied with a thread, and exposed to the air



sample to be measured.  Either the time until the rubber begins to crack



or the degree of cracking after a specified time is then related to the ozone



concentration.  This procedure has the following advantages:



        a.  The equipment required is extremely simple.



        b.  The rubber is apparently sensitive only to ozone and not to other



oxldants.



          There are several disadvantages:



        a.  The simplicity of the equipment is offset by the necessity of



calibrating the rubber and training the operator.



        b.  Continuous monitoring is extremely laborious.



    3.  Ultraviolet Photometry



          Another method specific for ozone is based on ozone's absorption



of ultraviolet lightwaves between the lengths of 3000 and 4000 A.  Renzetti



described an ultraviolet photometer using this band, and later a mercury


                             23 24
vapor detector was developed.  '
                                     5-22

-------
                        The strong mercury line at 2437A matches the peak absorption in the



              ozone band very closely.  It is believed that there are no serious



              interferences.    The Kruger photometer was available commercially for several



              years.  Because of electronic instability and temperature dependence, it



              required frequent attention and is not in extensive use.



                  4.  Other Methods



                        A variety of oxidant and ozone methods were critically evaluated.   '



                '     Several spectrometrie methods have been reported to be specific for


                    9 (\ 97 9 ft 90
              ozone.  '  '  '    One of these involves ozone addition to l,2-di-(4-pyridyl)


                       28 29
              ethylene.  '    There is one recent reference, one in which dihydroacridine



              is oxidized by ozone to acridine,   another in which N-phenyl-2-naphythylamine


                                                              31
              with o=dichlorobenzene gives a color with ozone.


                                                    32 33
                        In a gas-titration technique  '   the incoming air is injected



              periodically with trans-2-butane, then held in a mixing chamber.  This



              intermittent removal of ozone is quantitative and may be detected with a total



              oxidant analyzer such as the Mast detector.  There is also a galvanic ozone


                     34
              method.    None of these methods has yet been used much in air monitoring.



              E.  OXIDES OF NITROGEN



                  1.  Standards



                        The nitrogen oxides important in air pollution are nitric oxide, NO,



4             and nitrogen dioxide, N0?.  Calibration with  the relatively stable NO is made



              much  as  it  is with othei gases and only presents problems in that its


                                                                      35
+             oxidation at high concentrations  in air is quite rapid.     (The rate for

-------
oxidation of NO to N02 by oxygen Is proportional to the square of the NO



concentration.)  To avoid oxidation during dilution, one technique is to



dilute it initially with nitrogen alone, then rapidly mix with air to the



desired concentration.  Once diluted to near atmospheric levels, the reaction



is very slow.  The fast oxidation may be used to advantage in some cases



where small amounts of gaseous N02 are needed.  Gaseous NO and a slight



stoichiometric excess of air or oxygen are drawn successively into a gas-tight



syringe, held for 30 to 60 seconds to complete NO- formation, then injected


                                        36
into the vessel where the NO, is wanted.



          Preparation of accurate low concentrations of NO. starting with the



liquid is not a simple task, because at high concentration it tends to



dimerize and condense in gas lines.  The system must be heated beyond the



point in the lines where adequate dilution has occurred.  A precision gas



dilution system,   an electrolysis system   and permeation tubes  have all



been used for NO, dilution.  One or another of these systems is needed for



dynamic calibration.  Static calibration is made with standard solutions of



nitrite ion.



    2.  Colorimetric Methods


                                                             39
          The Griess-Ilosvay reaction as modified by Saltzman   is the most



popular method for determining NO,.  The NO, in acid solution in this reaction



forms a colored dye complex with an aromatic sulfonlc acid and an aromatic



amine.  There are numerous variations on this basic, reaction.  'ine method is



used for both manual and automatic analysis and is quite sensitive (to 0.01
                                     5-24

-------
ppm NO-, or better).  By using an oxidation scrubber to convert it to N0«,


                          40 41 42
NO may also be determined.  '  '



          Although the original Saltzman reagent included sulfanilic acid



and ft~naphthylamine, the latter has been replaced by N-(l-naphthyl)-ethylene-



diamine hydrochloride.  The medium is 14 percent (volume) acetic acid.  (These




reagents are used in the tentative method adopted by the Intersociety. Committee


                                                  43
on Methods for Ambient Air Sampling and Analysis.)    A similar formulation



is used in automatic analyzers, where the coupled complex may be removed on



a charcoal column and the reagent recirculated.  Other variations are used.



    3.  Other Methods



          A gas chromatographic procedure exists for the analysis of NO and


    44
N0_.    These contaminants possess characteristic infrared absorption patterns



and with long path length optics may be assayed spectrometrically, although the



NO absorption is rather weak.  Remote-sensing correlation spectrometry,



similar to that used for S0_ determination,  '   has been applied to NO



detection and may be a useful procedure when fully tested.  These and other


                                                   47
remote sensing methods have been reviewed recently.



F.  GASEOUS ORGANIC POLLUTANTS



    1-  Total Hydrocarbons



        a.  Flame lonization Analyzers



          Originally developed as a detector for gas chromar.^graphy, me



flame ionization technique was then adapted for total hydrocarbon analysis.



In  this technique the increase in ion intensity upon introduction of a sample
                                     5-25

-------
Into a hydrogen flame is observed on an electrometer.   The response is



approximately in proportion to the number of organically bound carbon atoms



in the sample.  Carbon atoms bound to oxygen, nitrogen, or halogen give



reduced or no response.  There is no response to nitrogen, carbon monoxide,




carbon dioxide, or water vapor, but there is an oxygen effect which can be



minimized by appropriate operating conditions.  The response is rapid and,



with careful calibration, fairly sensitive (to a fraction of a ppm carbon,



as methane).  Some variations in response to various hydrocarbons occur.


                                               49
These must be accounted for in data evaluation.    The instrument also
                                                                             i



responds to hydrocarbon derivatives approximately according to the proportion



of carbon atoms bound to carbon or hydrogen.



          In typical polluted air samples the largest hydrocarbon component



by far is methane, usually more abundant than all other hydrocarbons combined.



Methane, however, is generally considered to be virtually inert in photochemical



reactions.  In effect, it serves as an inert dilutent, reducing the precision



of reactive hydrocarbon measurement.  This fact has led to attempts to



measure methane and other hydrocarbons separately.    In one technique a



carbon column is treated with methane until it "breaks through," i.e., no



more methane is absorbed, although other hydrocarbons are still retained.



This column, along with the flame ionizatlon analyzer, constitutes a "methane



only" analyzer.  Run in parallel or in alternation with the conventional




analysis, it affords a measure of methane and total hydrocarbons ana, by



difference, the nonmethane or close approximation of the reactive fraction.  '  '
                                      5-26

-------
        h.  Spectroscopic. Methods



          These methods are usually applied to a sample concentrated by



freeze-out or other technique.  The principal problem is calibration.  In



many cases hexane is used as a calibration compound to represent the whole



uydrocarbon class.  In infrared methods the reading is made at about 3.4p



(the carbon-hydrogen bond stretch wavelength).  This tends to give more



weight to saturated hydrocarbons rich in carbon-hydrogen bonds than to



unsaturates.  If the absorbance at other infrared wavelengths can be read,



some correction can be made for certain principal components such as methane,



acetvleae and ethylene.



          Nondispersive infrared instruments have similar limitations,



although they may be calibrated with other hydrocarbon mixtures.  For



atmospheric analysis without freeze-out, the cell path lengths required are


     .    1
very long.



    2.  Hy d rocar bon s by Type



        a.  Gas Chromatography



          "GC" is almost the ideal method for atmospheric hydrocarbon



auaiysas.  '    With flame ionization detection, it has sensitivity to the



ppb range; with judicious choice of columns and temperatures, almost any



ili-sii fd separation of components can be effected.  Its principal drawback is



tlie luck of qualitative identification.  This is usually alleviated by a



.standardized operation with both sample and reference materials, or by use



01 a qualitative detector such as an infrared or mass spectrometer to identify



i ndiv Ldua L components.
                                     5-27

-------
          For type separations with GC there arc eubtractlve columns to be



used before or after GC.  Good examples are the mercuric parchlorate or silver



sulfate-sulfuric acid columns which remove unsaturates and pass paraffins.



This simplifies the total analysis problem where individual components of



different hydrocarbon types overlap or interfere in the chromatogram.



        b.  Spectrometric Method



          Both infrared and mass spectrometric methods are capable of



considerable discrimination among hydrocarbons, but their sensitivity levels



necessitate a freeze-out or concentration step.  Infrared spectra can show    ,



the proportions of various olefin types, the various aliphatic carbon-



hydrogen types (primary, secondary or tertiary) and some aromatic types.



The mass spectrometer can differentiate paraffin, olefin plus naphthene, and



aromatic groups, and in restricted narrow fractions may permit analysis for


                      56
individual components.



        c.  Miscellaneous Methods



          A number of methods for olefin determination by colorimetric or



coulometric techniques are available.  The colorimetric reagents Include


                57                                                  58
phosphomolybdate   and p-dimethylaminobinzaldehyde in sulfuric acid.



Among various methods based on addition i •" bromine, a coulometric method



based on time for bromine generation was used successfully in several



studies.



    3.-  Oxygenated Gaseous Organic



        a.  General Method
                                     5-28

-------
          Only a few specific types of oxygenated organics have been shown to


be present in the atmosphere, although others are strongly suspected.  Except

                               60
for one formaldehyde procedure,   there are no automated methods for these


contaminants, only manual (mostly colorimetrie).   The contaminants definitely


identified in the atmosphere include formaldehyde, other aldehydes, and formic


acid.  Ketones and alcohols are expected but not yet demonstrated.  The


methods for carbonyls are based largely on condensation reactions.    Sampling


of oxygenates is difficult because of water solubility and ready condensation


or adsorption in the system.


        b.  Bisulfite Method



          This aqueous reagent forms moderately stable complexes with lower

                                              62
molecular weight aldehydes and methyl ketones.    Heavier aldehydes are too


insoluble and ketones form unstable complexes.  After complex formation the


excess reagent is destroyed and the complex broken up.  The released bifulfite


is analyzed by iodimetry.  The method is only moderately sensitive.  The


reagent is also used as a collection absorber for other methods because the


caihouyls are readily liberated by acidification of the complex.


        c.  Other Condensation Reagents


          There are numerous reagents in this class which will react with


carbonyl compounds.   They include cyanide, hydroxylamine, phenyhydrazine,

                                            6Q
2,4-diraitropheylhydrazine, Schiff's reagent,   2-hydrazinobei.
-------
and sensitivity for formaldehyde when recent procedures are used.  The MBTH



is good for aliphatic aldehydes (including formaldehyde).64'65'66'67

                                                                              68
2,4-dinitropheylhydrazine is one of the more nearly general carbonyl reagents,


since it reacts with both aldehydes and ketones; however, used colorimetrically


there are shifts in wavelength with carbonyl type, and the gravimetric



procedures are lengthy and insensitive for atmospheric work.


          Formaldehyde has generally been found to be the predominant carbonyl


compound found in the atmosphere.  It is also water soluble and in most



derivatives is not typical of the rest of its class.  For this reason it is


often desirable to use a specific procedure for formaldehyde (such as the



chromotropic acid method),   then determine "total" aldehydes or carbonyls by



another method and attempt to allow for the formaldehydes found independently.


          The unsaturated aldehyde acrolein has also received special


attention because, like formaldehyde, it is a known lachrymator found in


measurable concentration in amoggy air.  The method in common use employs

                                                        69
4-hexylresorcinol reagent and is specific and sensitive.    It is a


colorimetric procedure.


          There is still neither a general method which really measures


"total" carbonyls for aldehydes completely  nor a proven automatic analysis


for any of them.


G.  PEROXYACYL NITRATES


    !•  Long Path Infrared Spectroscopy



          Peroxyacyl nitrates were discovered by means of long path IR,   but



characterized several ways.    Several aliphatic homologs have been synthesized
                                      5-30

-------
                                              72
and show similar but not identical IR spectra.    The acetyl and propionyl



                                               73
compounds have been observed in the atmosphere.    The butyryl and benzoyl




homologs have only been found by synthetic means, but the latter is reported


                                      74
to be an extremely potent lachrymator.    Peroxyacetyl nitrate is the most




abundant in atmospheric samples thus far analyzed and is used for calibration.




It has several characteristic absorption bands in the infrared which serve


                           72
to identify and measure it.




    2.  Gas Chromatography




          Increased sensitivity for the detection of PAN is provided by gas




enromatography using an electron capture detector.    The advantage of this




detector is its relative insensitivity to other compounds which might




interfere.




          Short columns (9 to 18 inches by 1/8-inch diameter) packed with




carbowax or an inert substance are used for the separation.  Retention time




for PAN is 1 to 2 minutes.  Two ml samples containing 1 ppb of PAN give




detectable peaks.  A cycling automatic GC method has been described recently.




H.  AEROSOLS AND ATMOSPHERIC TURBIDITY




    1.  Particulate Collection Methods



        a.  General Properties of Photochemical Aerosols




          In addition to the usual proportion of solid particulates (found




even without a photochemical reaction svstera), the participate material




observed in a photochemical aerosol is partially liquid in character.  There




i.s generally a certain amount of moisture and other evaporable liquid present,
                                     5-31

-------
which makes weight and volume estimates difficult and dependent on recent




sample history.  Prolonged passage of sample air over the aerosol may




evaporate part of the collected material.  The weight of a collected




photochemical aerosol depends on the relative humidity in which it has been




kept between collection and weighing.    The extent to which gaseous




photochemical reaction products condense to liquid and perhaps solid




materials, or condense into solid particulate material, is very uncertain.




Thus aerosol collection, size separation, and characterization are still




very difficult.  Most of the conventional methods described below are




collection methods which are suitable for solid particulates but have very




uncertain effects on liquid aerosols.  The methods based on light scattering




do not affect the particles appreciably, but are hard to relate to known




particulate sizes and densities.




        b.  Filtration




          The ordinary fibrous filters are unsuitable for airborne particulates




because the particles penetrate the filter and cannot be readily observed,




counted, or sized.  The preferred filter media are those which are not




penetrated by the particles, e.g., membrane filters such as Milllpore or



Nuclepore.  These are efficient collectox  into which the particles penetrate




little, and are available in a range ol pore sizes suitable for collecting




given size ranges of particles.  Their pressure drops are generally not




excessive.  The membrane material may be selected so as to be soluble in




chosen solvents, to allow suspension or solution of the collected material




in a liquid for further assay.
                                      5-32

-------
        c.  Iner t tal Co1lee t ion

          This method directs the air sample stream against a solid surface

at high velocity so as to adsorb particulatea on the surface.  Very small

particulates require high air velocities, since otherwise they will follow

the airstream paths and not settle on the solid surface.  Impingement

usually refers to the process as carried out within a liquid; impaction is a

dry process.  The cascade impactor uses several sequential impactions made

to occur at serially increasing air velocities by reducing in steps the size

of the Jets or orifices through which the air flows towards the impaction


surface.   These collectors are suitable for particles down to about 1/3 to 1

micron in diameter.  The Anderson Sampler'"''' and the Lundgren Impactor

are examples of this type.  The Anderson device has six to eight stages in

which material is collected on flat dishes or plates.  The size distribution

at each stage has been accurately determined.  In the Lundgren device, at

each of four stages a slit faces a rotor covered with a collecting film or

foil.  Varying rotor speed allows for variable time resolution or collection

density.  These and other stage impaction devices are commercially available.

          An example of centrifugal inertial collector is the Goetz Aerosol
             n i
Spectrometer,   a device used mainly for research work.   In it the air passes

through a helical path against a rotating cone upon which particles are

deposited in a graded mass sequence.  The simpler cyclone is C.XSQ a

centrifugal collector but has no moving parts, using only the tangential
                                      5-33

-------
velocity of the air stream.  It is a simple, reliable device capable of many
variations and moderate efficiency, but has been used more in industrial
exhaust control than as an atmospheric analyzer.
        d.  Electrostatic Precipitation
          This method is highly efficient for both solid and liquid particulates
in the size range 0.01 to 10y, but is limited by the stability of the
particles at the operating temperature and the rate of gas flow.  It is used
more in industrial waste control than in atmospheric analysis.  For further
examination after collection the material must usually be transferred from
the apparatus to another site, such as a microscopic slide.  Commercial
versions are available.
        e-  Thermal Precipitation
          The efficiency of this technique is very high for particles below
10u, virtually 100 percent for particles below 5y, both liquid and solid.
Its limitation is principally the very slow rate of air flow and sample
collection.  It is particularly advantageous in not subjecting the particles
to much force, so that they are collected without much alteration from their
                                                              82
state in the gas phase.  Commercial-sized units are available.
    2.  In Situ Aerosol Analyzers
        a.  Photometric
          In general, photometric methods require use of a light beam of
wavelength that is an order of magnitude of the diameter of particles to be
        82
assayed.    With visible light, particles of about 0.2 to around lOy are
                                     5-34

-------
measurable.   In one type of analyzer the light scattered at some selected



angle by each particle is detected and counted to give an estimate of


                       83
particle concentration.    If a pulse height analyzer is added, the



particles may be counted in size ranges to determine the size distribution.



In another type of system, used more in smoke or plume measurement, the



attenuation of a standard light source is used to estimate the aerosol



concentration.



          A promising application of light-scattering by aerosols is the



nephelometer of Charlson.    In this device a photomultiplier detector at



one end of a tube is shielded by fixed annual rings from direct view of a




llashing xenon lamp at the side of the tube.  Calibration is made with clean



nitrogen (or even helium) for downscale readings, a series of heavier gases



up to Freon 112 for higher molecular scattering levels, and a small fixed



spot of reflective material behind a shutter for field calibration.  The



scattering intensities have been related to meteorological visibility


                           0 C Of.

estimates in a precise way.  '    The instrument is rugged and suitable for



field use.  A commercial version is under evaluation.


                                 87
          In the Lidar instrument   a tightly collimated beam of light (a



Laser is used) is flashed through the atmosphere.  A telescope focused down



the same path is.used to collect back-scattered light for photomultiplier



detection and display on an oscilloscope.  There is a known intensity decay



curvy in clear air which is increased by scattering from any particulates.



The time to any given response point can be related to the distance.  Pointed
                                     5-35

-------
upward, for instance, the presence of an inversion layer has been shown by



discontinuities in the decay curve.  The aerosol density may be estimated



from scattering intensity.



        b.  Condensation Nuclei Counters



          If submicron aerosol particles are present in an air sample in



which the relative humidity is brought to supersaturation by adiabatic



expansion, vapor condenses on the aerosol particles to give droplets detectable



by optical methods.  The expansion for any existing relative humidity may be



varied so that aerosol particles of various size ranges are selectively



effective in nucleation.  The concentration of droplets under given conditions



is a measure of aerosol concentration.  Commerical Instruments are


          82
available.



I.  BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS



    1.  Bacterial Response



          Photochemical air pollution and some of its specific constituents



have been shown to have bacteriostatlc or bactericidal effects (in fact,



ozone used as a germicide).  The effects of gaseous smog components on

                                                        i

bacteria apparently depend strongly on the medium in which the bacteria



occur and possibly on the humidity.  There uave been efforts to use



bacterial responses as smog Indicators.  In one example the bacteria were
                        •
                                                        i

exposed to the impaction of photochemical aerosols, then growth inhibitation
                                      5-36

-------
was estimated.    A more recent technique utilized luminescent bacteria.  '   '



The inhibitory effects of a synthetic smog on the luminescence was measured



by a photodetector.



    2.  Plant Damage



          Many types of plants are sensitive to photochemical air pollution.



Plant damage Is often the first indication of deteriorating air quality.  Under



laboratory conditions the types of damage to selected species are relatable



to specific air pollutants.  In ambient air, the damage is apt to be less



readily diagnosed and it is suspected there are phytotoxicants in smog which



have not yet been identified.  The known agents include ozone, PAN and



nitrogen dioxide.



    3.  Sensory Irritation



        Photochemically polluted air usually has an odor—often described as



pungent—somewhat akin to that of ozone itself at low concentrations.  Heavily



polluted air causes some people to feel discomfort in breathing, such as



nose or throat irritation or chest pain.  Probably the most universal


                                       92
irritation, however, is eye irritation.    In severe smog episodes a



large fraction of those exposed suffer eye-smarting or burning, sometimes



accompanied by lachrimation.  Estimation of intensity or prevalence of



eye irritation has been used as a smog indicator.  The sensation is so



subjective and variable among subjects that panels of at least five or



six persons are ordinarily averaged.  This makes the measurement clumsy and



expensive as a routine measure.
                                     5-37

-------
J.  AIR QUALITY DATA



          The great bulk of available air quality data goes back little more



than IS years.  In the middle 1950*0, the Los Angeles County Air Pollution



Control District (LACAPCD) established the first large-scale air monitoring


                                                             93
network based upon the use of continuous automatic analyzers.    This network



included potassium iodide oxldant records, Saltzman reagent dual nitric oxide



and nitrogen dioxide analyzers, ozone photometers (for several years beginning



in 1958) and, at a later date, flame ionlzation type hydrocarbon analyzers.



At its peak this network comprised 14 stations.




          In 1961, the State of California Department of Public Health organized



a statewide cooperative air-monitroing network (SCAN) of 16 stations.    Six



of these were equiped and operated entirely by the Department; the remaining




nine were selected stations from the existing Los Angeles County network.



          The Public Health Service opened the first station of its Continuous



Air Monitoring Project (CAMP) in Cincinnati in October 1961.95  By early



1962 five additional stations were opeating in Chicago, Philadelphia, San



Francisco, New Orleans, and Washington, D.C., in cooperation with local air



pollution control agencies.  The station in New Orleans was moved to St. Louis



in 1964, and in 1965 the San Francisco St. '-.ion equipment was moved to Denver.



Air monitoring in the San Francisco area was continued and expanded by the



Bay Area Air Pollution Control District.



          The Public Health Service has conducted numerous other tir sampling



activities, principally as a part of abatement or research efforts.    In



the last few years there have been major expansions in monitoring efforts






                                     5-38

-------
by local, State and Federal agencies.  The cities of Chicago and New York, the




Puget Sound area, the States of New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania have




all embarked on such efforts incorporating telemetering capabilities.




In California alone, oxidants are continuously measured at about 40 air




monitoring stations.  Many other local agencies, states and even industrial




organizations and universities are engaged in programs that are almost daily




adding to the available air quality data.




          Air quality as related to the photochemical air pollution problem




must be described in terms of a whole series of interrelated compounds.  Some




of these are of direct interest because of their effects on humans, animals,




plants, materials, or visibility, and some because they are primary reactants




which form substances responsible for the aforementioned effects.  Several




art- or can be important from both points of view.




          It is necessary then to present information on atmospheric concen-




trations for at least the most significant photochemical reactants and products.




Of those compounds discussed earlier in this chapter, data are presented on




total oxidant, ozone, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, and PAN.




          Even though substantial quantities of data are being collected, much




of it is still relatively inaccessible.  Substantial differences exist in




reporting parameters, methods of data processing, computer software and hardware




(where used) and hard copy output.  In many cases collect^ ig organizations




are not equipped to provide substantial outside access to their data.




          Most of the above problems are the result of rapid growth, changing




demands on daia format, and advancing technology, rather than lack of concern






                                     5-39

-------
about the problems.  National data banks have been proposed such as the Storage


and Retrieval of Air Quality Data (SAROAD) system97 of the Public Health


Service.  No single source exists, however, for even a major portion of the


data collected nationally.


          The contaminant data presented in this report are from the continuous


air monitoring program (CAMP) stations and the New York-New Jersey Abatement


project of the U.S. Public Health Service; several stations in California


(two from Los Angeles area, one each from San Francisco and San Diego, one


smaller coastal city, and one smaller Inland city; Bayonna, New Jersey


(State of New Jersey Network); New York City; Phoenix, Ariiona; and, In the


case of hydrocarbons and PAN, from special sampling activities of the


USPHS, State of California, Los Angeles County APOD, and the University of


California at Riverside.


    1.  Methods of Expressing Air Quality


          The initial form of the basic contaminant data is dependent on the


measuring system.  This ranges from discrete samples taken over a given time


interval to the record produced by a rapid response continuous analyser.


In either instance only a sample of the total atmosphere is available:


and in the second, our continuous record still represents a single point

                                   i
in space.              '            y

                                  ['
          The problem in selection'Jof data reporting parameters i* to provide
sufficient information to enable


complete system and to Judge the
                                         o£ inferences about the real and
                                    Ce» against known criteria or standards
                                     5-40

-------
relating to its effects.  Figure 5-2 provides an example of the sampling results



that might be obtained from the same system by three different approaches.



Although the inference about the time of peak would be offset in the case



of the grab samples, it is evident that 4-hour mean calculated from all three



approaches would be very close.



          Still other problems surround the task of relating distinct episodes



to mean values over longer time periods.  Here we first encounter "descriptive"



statistics, or those used to determine position and dispersion.  These



statistics are useful in making comparisons among locations, seasons or



years, and in describing the past or expected frequency of pollution events.



A few of these common statistics are defined below.



          The first is the arithmetic mean.  This value is described as the



t>um of thf observations divided by the total number of observations.  If



we let the n observations of some value x be denoted as x, ,x,,,x-,.. .x , and
                                                         1  /  j     n


the mean as x, then we can write the formula
win-re 2__,  it- the usual symbol for the sum of the values.  A useful statistic


                                                                       2
describing the dispersion of these individual values is the variance, s ,



or the standard deviation, s.  The variance is defined as the sum 01 -vc



.squares of the deviations from the mean, divided by one less than the number



of observations.  The formula expressing this value is
                                   n-1



                                     5-41

-------
                                     o

                                     §
                                                a.
                                                o.
                                     3
                                     S
                                         i
                                         u.
                                         o
                                         Ul
                                                 oo
                                     .8
                                      !•«.
                                      O
a
i—*
DC
2
                                                 o
                                                 evj
                                                  i
                                                 in
(Wdd)  '3NOO
    5-A2

-------
          In some cases Che distribution of a large number of values about

the arithmetic mean is symmetrical.  In these cases the distribution is described

as "normal."  In many situations in nature the distribution of the logarithms

is normal.  In these cases interest lies in the geometric mean illustrated

somewhat indirectly in the formula below:

                                                        n
                                 log (geometric mean) - ]P  log x
where the logs are distributed normally, we have a "lognormal" distribution.

          To illulstrate the effect of averaging, Figure 5-3 includes an hourly

plot of the average oxidant values for 2 different days in a month, along

with the mean monthly trace of these values.  All are known as diurnal plots.

The mean monthly curve is smoother than either of the other 2 days shown.

          Although differences in data processing procedures and formats

exist among the organizations collecting air quality data, there are several

basic reporting parameters used by most for data acquired by continuous

analyzers.  These would include (1) peak concentration for each day (highest

instantaneous value reached), (2) hourly average concentrations by each hour

of the day, and (3) the maximum hourly concentration for each day.  From these,
                                                      »
basic day mean values over various time periods may be calculated and

frequency distributions of the individual values or the means compiled.

          Most organizations determine hourly average values by a simple

graphical integration procedure using the recorder charts.  In the U.S.

Public Health Service CAMP network, the use of analog-to-digital converters


                                     5-43

-------
      .50
      .40
1  E-30
   a.
   o
      .20
      .10
             	 SEPTEMBER 22, 1966,  THURSDAY,
             	 SEPTEMBER 11, 1966,  SUNDAY,
                    MEAN MONTHLY TRACE.
        00      03
06       09        12N       15
               TIME OF DAY
18
                       FIGURE 5-3. DIURNAL OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS,
                                   POMONA, CALIFORNIA, SEPTEMBER 1966.
21
00
                                        5-44

-------
also provide machine-calculated or/ -machine determined hourly averages.

          Most of the data presented in the remaining portion of this chapter


deals with hourly averages as the basic unit of data.  Those cases in which

  i
instantaneous values are used are clearly defined.

    2.  Typical Concentration Patterns in Photochemical Air Contaminants


          In preparing an environmental appraisal of the photochemical air

pollution problem, we must be concerned not only with specific time-concentration-


frequency values for the individual contaminants for which effects criteria


are available, but also with the interrelated temporal patterns exhibited


by these substances.  These patterns give form to the data and provide a

preliminary insight into the character of the phenomena, i.e., possible


differences resulting from location, from meteorological influences, and from


emissions of air contaminants.  More rigorous mathematical analyses and simulation


modeling may extend or confirm this preliminary knowledge, but the visual


impact of typical pollution patterns is an important first step in under-


.sLandiug the problem.

          It is for this reason that most of the information on diurnal and

season.-jJ variations in photochemical reactants and products is presented


in the following subparagraphs.  Furthermore, most information of this type

is in graphical form.  Hydrocarbon data are not generally included here


because most such data from continuous analyzers provides cuiy carbon atom


concentrations with no separation of natural methane.  Thus the patterns


of reactive hydrocarbons are somewhat indistinct.  Hydrocarbon data are discussed

in section J4c.
                                     5-45

-------
        a.  Diurnal Variations



          Inasmuch as air pollution is observed initially by incidents



or episodes, Figure 5-4 is presented to show the diurnal variation of oxidant,




nitric oxide, and nitrogen dioxide for a single day in the urban center of



Los Angeles.  The time of year is during the period that frequent photochemical



air pollution episodes occur.



          Before daylight, the primary contaminants NO, hydrocarbons, and




CO remain fairly stable at concentrations somewhat higher than the daily



minimums, which usually occur during daylight hours at times of maximum



ventilation and mixing.  N0_ also fits the former pattern.  Ozone is near



zero.  As human and traffic activity increase in the hours Just after dawn,



primary contaminants  increase.  As ultraviolet energy from the sun becomes



available, nitric oxide peaks and nitrogen dioxide increases, often with a



nearly complete conversion occurring.  Finally, as the nitric oxide concentration




(and thus the nitric  oxide to nitrogen dioxide ratio) reaches very low levels,



ozone begins to accumulate, reaching a peak about midday.



          Before the  ozone peak is reached, the primary contaminants and N0»



normally have been declining for some time.  Although not shown in this



figure, other reaction products such as ^AN peak at a time more closely



corresponding with ozone than with the primary contaminants.  In the usual



situation, all contaminants decrease rather rapidly as the ventilation



capacity of the atmosphere increases.  This results from surface heatit:j, which



causes increased instability of the atmosphere, and from rising winds.
                                      5-46

-------
   0.50 i
   0.40 -\
§
ZE
Q.
3

O

CJ


 00

o
 *

 CXI

o
o
                               TIME OF DAY
   FIGURE 5-4. CONCENTRATIONS OF POLLUTANTS—LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.
                                  5-47

-------
          As solar intensity decreases, stability increases and winds decrease.



The late afternoon and evening traffic increase results in increased concen-



trations of primary contaminants, but solar energy is no longer available to



pause the photo-oxidation of nitric oxide and the production of ozone and



other products.



          It is obvious, but necessary, to point out that the concentration



patterns shown in Figure 5-4 are for a single day at a single loc&irion.



There are many factors which could result in absolute and relative levels of



the concentrations and in their time distribution during the day.  Of particular



importance are (1) variations in time and nature of emissions of photochemical



product-forming contamlnatns, (2) variation in available solar irradiation and



other photophysical variables, and (3) variations in transport and diffusion



of contaminants in the atmosphere.  All of the above influences may vary over



very short time periods (hours), while the latter two categories also



exhibit significant seasonal variations.



          In general, the time of year having highest concentrations of



oxidant and other photochemical products is between early summer and fall.



If the zenith angle of the sun were the only consideration, the time of the



summer solstice would produce the higher concentrations.  However, periods



of maximum atmospheric stability and lew horizontal transport do not coincide



in all locations of the country, thus producing a range in time of seasonal



highs.  The mean daily time of oxidant peak is near noon, although even hire,



cloud cover, thermal stability and the advection of pollutants may result in much



later peaks or even in multiple peaks (commonly, two).
                                     5-48

-------
          Figure 5-5 shows average diurnal traces for oxidant and N02 for




Bayonne, New Jersey; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and St. Louis, Missouri.




A peak oxidant month from the available data for each location was selected




for this illustration.  In each case the familiar pattern is followed:  an




early NO  peak, followed by an oxidant maximum near midday, and finally a




late afternoon and evening rise in NC^.





          Figure 5-6 presents the diurnal variation in  oxidant for Philadelphia




on August 6, 1966 during a 3-day period  (August  6-8) for which unusually high




concentrations were observed.  This illustrates  the situation in which acute




episodes in differing geographical locations can be quite similar, although




the means show distinct differences.  In fact, caution  must be used in




interpreting mean diurnal curves because statistical smoothing results in




.i trace which may not accurately represent any one single day.  This is




particularly true when comparisons with other contaminants are made.  The




ratio of means for any given period could likely be different from the




moan of the individual ratios.




          The specific time at which the oxidant value  reaches its peak




deponds not only upon meteorological parameters  governing accumulation and




dispersion of the contaminants reacting to form  this group of compounds




(mainly ozone), but upon the spatial relationship of the point of measurement




with the source area.  To illustrate the effect  of transport a..id souxx-- area,




Figure 5-7 shows the monthly mean hourly average concentrations for October,




1965 for West Los Angeles, Los Angeles (center city), Azusa, and Riverside,




California.
                                     5-49

-------
                             (BAYONNE, PHILADELPHIA,  AND ST. LOUIS
                              MONTHLY MEAN OF HOURLY  AVERAGE
                              CONCENTRATIONS.)
.20-
.18-
,16
.14-
.12-
.10
.08
.06H
.04
.02
       FIGURE  5-5a. OXIDANT
   ST.LOUIS, JUNE 1966
                                           BAYONNE, JULY 1966
	*xl — S ^PHILADELPHIA, AUGUST 1966
   00
     03     06     09    12N    15     18     21
                                                            00
   .20-
~ .18-
I -16-
- .14-
J .12-
I .10-
t .08-
§ .06-
2 .04-
X
o  n:
       FIGURE 5-5b. NO,
                            .BAYONNE, NOVEMBER 1968
                                            .PHILADELPHIA, AUGUST 1966
                                       xrnu.Auci.rn in
                  ST.LOUIS, JUNE 1%6
   00     03     06    09    NOON    15     18     21     00

                         TIME OF DAY
 FIGURE 5-5.  DIURNAL VARIATION IN OXIDANT AND NO-, CONCENTRATIONS.
                                5-50

-------
                                                        CNJ
                                                                   OO
                                                       a  I
                                                            o:
                                                       •s
                                                                   o <:
                                                 u. >-
                                                 o oo
                                                   z
                                                 z z
                                                 O LU
                                                                   o: 1-1
                                                                   < T:
                                                                   > o-
                                                 O Q.
                                                                   VO
                                                                   I
                                                                   UJ
                                                                   a:
                                                        PO
                                                        o
O
CO
o
CM
                  O               O


       (Wdd)  'DNOD  1NVQIXO
                           5-51

-------
0.120
0,0»0
0040
0
0.160
0.120
E
«. o.oao
^ 0.040
1 °
ft 0.160
8 0.120
0.080
0.040
0
0.120
O.000
0.040
0
/ X
WEST / X
- IDS ANGELES / \
""""%""" ^Y^^**" i j i ii ' i r i ""**
DOWNTOWN / \
- LOS ANGELES / \
„_ 	 _/ X 	
1 1 "™"l III 1 1 1 1 1
- AZUSA / \
i i i i i i ii iii
t -A
- RIVERSIDE /"^ . \
r-; 	 j-^, ,,,-,,, ""*,
2 4 6 0 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 I!
« 	 A M 	 k. 
-------
          The station at West Los Angeles is about 10 miles west, Azusa about
20 miles east, and Riverside about 60 miles southeast of the central Los Angeles
station.  As shown, the time of peak oxidant concentration progressively
becomes later from west to east.  This coincides with the daytime ocean-to-
land movement of air regularly observed in California coastal regions from
spring to fall months.  There is indication of another but earlier peas in
Riverside which is generally attributed to local pollution sources.
          The supposition that the rather high oxidant concentrations in less
densely populated Azusa and Riverside are at least in part due to pollution
transport is given strength by the carbon monoxide traces for the same areas
as shown in Figure 5-8.  The times of peak CO values are much the same for
all four locations, but the concentrations are lower in Azusa and Riverside
as compared to West and central Los Angeles.  The conclusion reached by confirm-
ing inspection of these figures with Information gained from Chamber studies
is that under the conditions present, the rate of oxidant formation in the air
mass moving from west to east over the Los Angeles basin and inland valleys
exceeded the dilution effect.
          In almost all metropolitan areas of the United States outside of
California, oxidant data are presently available from only one,—or at most
a few—locations.  However, particular combinations of source strength variations
in hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides and in patterns of air PASS ttti^^ort
may contribute to the same type of contaminant concentration and time
variation as just shown for the Los Angeles area.  Thus we should not be
surprised at any deviations from present patterns as information from augmented
air monitoring networks becomes available.
                                     5-53

-------
2*0"
20.0
16.0
12.0

/\ WEST x^.
/ \ LOS ANGELES X X
^ .^" *x ^

• nl l i it til i l l l j
i
«
ff
20.0 -
                                camuu.
                            LOS  ANGELES
16.0
12.0
ft
.. — — -^ ^— ^^^^"^ — •-"
-
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1


1 1 1
I
0
u


12.0

e.o
4.0
o
AZUSA
__— _ ^.•-p*~"— """»—.»
-
.
l i l l i i l l J I l l
12.0
8.0
4.0
ft
R
*^^ ^^.
- ^^ X 	
l i i l t i
                              RIVERSIDE
                                  i    I    I    I    '    '
                A.M.
8   10   12   i   4
                      HOUR OF DAY, PST
                                             .
                                       6   8
                                        P.M.
                                                  10   12
       Figure  5-8.  CARBON MONOXIDE MONTHLY MEAN HOURLY
                   AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS—OCTOBER 1965.
                           5-54

-------
        b.  Seasonal Variations




          The seasonal variation by month for the major contaminants involved




in or resulting from atmospheric photochemical reactions depends upon whether




the contaminant is consumed or produced on a net basis during daylight hours.




For nitric oxide and hydrocarbons, as with most primary contaminants,




higher aiean values are observed during late fall and winter months.  IViere




is la,;y overall atmospheric mixing during these months in most cases and less




consumption to form products.




          Total oxidant, as indicated previously, typically exhibits a seasonal




peak during the period from early summer to early fall.  This is, of course,




the time of year when more intense short wavelength solar irradiation




reaches the earth's surface.  On the west coast of the United States a




persistent late summer and early fall subsidence temperature inversion and




less cloud cover enhance the potential for high oxidant levels.




          The pattern for nitrogen dioxide is not quite so distinct.  The more




efficient photochemical oxidation of nitric oxide in the summer is somewhat




offset by the slower nitrogen dioxide disappearance rate in the winter.




Thus varied and somewhat differing patterns are observed from city to city.




          Figure 5-9 shows the seasonal variations by month in average total




oxidant concentrations for the cities of Los Angeles, Denver, Phoenix and




Bayonne.  The month-by-month variation in the maximum hourly mean it, . "iown




for the same cities in Figure 5™lu.  In all locations the overall mean and




maximum hourly mean concentrations are higher during the summer months, although




the peak period for Los Angeles is somewhat later.  A number of factors includ-






                                     5-55

-------
                                                        r<=>
                                                        •O
    O» 00

    9) C^


    UJ *

    IS
    "3 00


    VO O

    2^
       I

LD  QC oe
ys  *^ '*t

r- CO Z 2
 en   x uj
 >- p£i-i Z
    UJ Z Z
   • >UI O
 < zo >•
   •Ul 3C <
 _l O SZ OQ
    "I
    III
                                                        • rs
i

OQ


•—i



1
O
                                                                   X
                                                                   O
                                                                 to
                                                                 t—t
                                                                 u.
00
                  CNJ
                                           §
                   Wdd  NOI1VU1N30NOO
                               5-56

-------
                                                              -Q
                                                                         Of.
                                                                         =>
                                                                         o
                                                              -o
                                                              -co
                                                                         o
                                                                         o
                                                              •z:
                                                                         o
                                                                         o
                                                                         Si
                                                                         >—«
                                                                         X
                                                                         o
                                                                         o
                                                                          I
                                                                         in
00

-------
ing leas cloud cover, lower wind speeds and stronger inversions account in


part for this difference.


          Figure 5-11 shows the seasonal patterns in nitric oxide by present-


ing the mean values by month of year during the time period indicated for the


cities of Chicago, Denver, Bayonne, and Los Angeles.  The distinctly higher


winter time levels are evident.


          The seasonal variation in nitrogen dioxide shown by monthly mean


values for the same cities is shown in Figure 5-12.  Here the pattern is less

distinct and varies from location to location.
                                                         i
    3.  Ozone vs. Oxidant Measurements


          Almost from the beginning of concern about photochemical air pollution,


questions have been raised about the true ozone concentrations in the atmosphere,


and the extent to which this compound comprises so-called total oxidant values.


Numbers of methods have been proposed which either theoretically or empirically


are claimed to give results specified for ozone.  These are treated more fully

in paragraph D. of this chapter.


          The principal problems associated with measurement of ozone with an

oxidation-reduction reaction such as that used in the potassium iodide total


oxidant method are positive interference fr.m nitrogen dioxide and negative

interference from sulfur dioxide.  In the case of nitrogen dioxide, the positive


Interference is variable depending upon specific instrument configuration and


potassium iodide concentration used.  '   '   '     For the color1'^.eric


type analyzers used in the CAMP network, and many state and local systems,


a reasonable estimate is that nitrogen dioxide gives a response equal to
                                     5-58

-------
                      u>
                      VO
                      <*
                             ss
\
                       \
 /
                                             o
                                            . LU
                                             Q
                                             >
                                            •O
                                            • O
                                             o
                                             Q.
                                            • uu
                                             1/1
\\i
\\:
/ I
/ i
/ /
' /
\
\|
/
/
\
\
\
•3
<
(X
<
Ul
_J >-
- fe
3:
5 S
-Z> O
•-a ae
                                                        s
                                                        UJ
                                                        o
                                                        o
                                                         i
                                                        in
                                                        oe
(Udd)  NOIi\/aiN33NOD  ON
                     5-59

-------





vD
«O
e>
i— •

1

*>







rv.
vo

•
co
UJ
UJ
o
CO
o
t
>
/
/
/
/
<— o 55
r— r— O
• • •
(Wdd)

/ h-
/ 1 \ .
/ | \ to
/ ' / £
/ / /
/ / / OL
* £ M LlJ
< / ' I '
>--J \
/a
/ /
/ / 1
'


H \ 1 \
' * \
I\ I \
%
NJ « \
\ / 2 /
\ /! tf /
V ' ' i /
Xv X / 2 f
X »' <
x Aw ?
^Ns^
\ ! ^
» • •
\ 1 /
•A
-'-"'! V






I y
l- r\
\ \
\ \
0
UJ
o
5»
g

§
0.
UJ
co
§3

s
• ri ul
0 O
-c
K-
• 5 §
o

>-
• <
oc
• O-
f.
Oi
$
•£9
u.

5
oor^^Lrt^ocvj^-
oo ooooo o
» * ••*•••
NOIlVblN3DN03 ZQH dV3A JO H1NON





to
H- 1
»—
S
£
UJ
<_)
S
o
c<
o
>-
_J
I
2-
£
§
z
cj
LA
UJ
g
CO
•— 1
u.






5-60

-------
20 percent of its concentration.



          Other positive interferences are possible (such as from PAN), but



under normal circumstances are of minor concern.  It is true, however, that



in some locations oxidant concentrations found are higher than would be



expected for the time of day or year.  An example is the St. Louis CAMP



station, which is located near a large chemical complex.  Occasional hJgh



oxidant concentrations, including one at 0.85 ppm, do not coincide with the



usual diurnal end seasonal pattern.  The National Air Pollution Control



Administration has found it necessary to exclude high levels occurring



before 11:00 A.M. and after 4:55 P.M. in listing maximum concentrations for



its CAMP stations.



          A potentially more serious interference in the measurement of ozone



by the potassium iodide method is the negative response caused by sulfur dioxide.



It acts in the reagent by reducing the iodine to the colorless iodide form.



The negative response is equal to the sulfur dioxide concentration, up to



the limit of the total oxidant originally present.  As an example, the response



of an oxidant analyzer to a stream containing 0.5 ppm ozone and 0.5 ppni sulfur



dioxide would be zero.  The response to a strema containing 0.25 ppm ozone and



0.5 ppm sulfur dioxide would also be zero.  This is important to remember



when considering some of the adjusted oxidant data presented in the next



few pages.



          Of all the approaches to obtaining true ozone concentrations only



a few have been used extensively enough to provide much data.  These would


                                   15                         98
ii.clude the ultraviolet photometric   and the chemiluminescent   methods.
                                      5-61

-------
An approach to eliminating the sulfur dioxide but not nitrogen dioxide


interference is the use of chromium trioxide scrubbers which remove sulfur


dioxide.  These were incorporated in all CAMP stations except San Francisco

                         9
at the beginning of 1964.   They are not used in the Los Angeles County network.


One slight disadvantage particularly in areas with little sulfur dioxide


results from the conversion by the scrubbers of nitric oxide to nitrogen


dioxide, thus increasing the positive interference.


          Efforts have also been made to correct the total oxidant concentrat-


ions by adjustment of the data to remove the effects of nitrogen dioxide and


sulfur dioxide.  This assumes that such data are available.  It also is done


on a fixed and arbitrary basis, and thus may not represent reality.  The


concentrations of oxidant for a summer and a winter month for each of four


stations are adjusted for nitrogen dioxide in Tables 5-2 and 5-3.


          Table 5-2 lists the monthly mean concentrations, while Table 5-3 lists


the monthly means at daily maximum hourly average concentrations.  The adjust-


ment was performed by subtracting a sum equal to one-fifth of the nitrogen


concentration for the same period from each total oxidant concentration.


As mentioned earlier the nitrogen dioxide interference is known to be


variable, particularly from analyzer to analyzer, so the correction cannot


be assumed to be perfect in any sense.  There is a further complication in


that the nitrogen dioxide analyzer tends to "smooth" the true concentrations


more than does the oxidant analyzer because it responds more slowly.  Since


hourly averages are calculated over fixed time periods, there is more likeli-


hood that a nitrogen dioxide concentration occuriing in the atmosphere at a
                                     5-62

-------
    Table 5-2.   OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE RESPONSE
                MONTHLY MEANS OF HOURLY AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS,  ppm
            Station
Month
 Concentration, ppm    Percent Due
Unadjusted   Adjusted


Summer
Months


Winter
Months

Lo& Angel ns
Sacramento
Denver
St. Louis
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Denver
St. Louis
July 1964
July 1965
July 1965
July 1964
Jan 1965
Jan 1965
Feb 1965*
Jan 1965
0.055
0.042
0.048
0.035
0.021
O.G20
0.029
0.024
0.044
0.036
0.041
0.029
0.005
0.015
0.019
0.020
20
14
15
17
76
25
35
17
* 12 days of data only
                                      5-63

-------
    Table 5-3.   OXIDANT CONCENTRATION ADJUSTED FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE RESPONSE
                MONTHLY MEANS OF DAILY MAXIMUM HOURLY AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS


Summer
Months


Winter
Months

Station
Los Angeles
Sacramento
Denver
St. Louis
Los Angeles**
Sacramento
Denver
St. Louis
Month

July 1964
July 1965
July 1965
July 1964
Jan 1965
Jan 1965
Feb 1965*
Jan 1965
Concentration, ppm Percent Due
Unadjusted Adjusted to NO,
1
0.166
0.085
0.110
0.078
0.037
0.035
0.073
0.046

0.154
0.075
0.098
0.071
0.020
0.028
0.060
0.040

7
12
11
9
46
20
18
13
* 12 days of data only

** 9 days of data when NC>2 measured at time of maximum hourly average oxidant
   concentration
                                      5-64

-------
particular time period will be partially reflected at a later instrument




time than will the reading on the oxidant analyzer.  This effect would tend to




disappear when averaging results over a month as in Tables 5-2 and 5-3,




but could be of consequence in individual values.




          Nevertheless, the tables show that the adjustment is generally




greater during the specified winter months than during the specified summer




months.  They further show that adjustment is less for maximum hourly averages




than for overall averages.  It is also interesting to note that greatest




change in percent effect from winter to summer is for Los Angeles.  The absolute




adjustment in all cases varies little from .01 ppm.




          For several years the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control




District operated ultraviolet photometers as  an approach to specific ozone




measurement.  In most cases they were operated in parallel with potassium




iodide total oxidant analyzers.  Although there were substantial operational




and maintenance problems, a substantial quantity of what is believed to be




valid data were produced.




          In Figure 5-13, the monthly means of the hourly average concentrations




of ozone are compared to concentrations of oxidants in Pasadena and in Los Angeles.




In Figure 5-14, the monthly means of the maximum hourly averages are compared.




In Figure 5-15 hour-by-hour values for ozone and oxidant concentrations for




Los Angeles and Pasadena are shown for the month of July, 1%4.




          The term "adjusted" oxidant in the three foregoing figures is calcu-




lated from the following expression




                         Adjusted oxidant - OX-1/5NO +SO







                                     5-65

-------
z z

                                                                           Z3 i—
                                                                           O

                                                                           Z<
                                                                           U.Z
                                                                           O LU
                                                                              O
                                                                           ^ <:
                                                                           >• Q
                                                                           _J Z
                                                                              co
                                                                              UJ
H- Cfl
                                                                           i-l CO
                                                                           X O
                                                                           O-J

                                                                           O  I
                                                                           z co
                                                                           <£. Z

                                                                           LU •—<
                                                                           ZH-
                                                                           O 
-------
   z
   o
<£ UJ
O o
•-« z
X O
O o
                                                                     o
                                5-67

-------
'V
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               £'

                                                                                                               a r~
                                                                                                               UJ >-
                                                                                                               i— _i
                                                                                                               t/l 3

                                                                                                               o   •

                                                                                                               I— Llj
                                                                                                               z o
                                                                                                               O I/O
                                                                                                               <£ UJ
                                                                                                               Q CJ
                                                                                                                  CO
                                                                                                                 •o
                                                                                                                LU _J
                                                                                                                Z  I
                                                                                                                O  i
                                                                                                                M LU
                                                                                                                O LO
                                                                                                                  oo
                                                                                                                Z UJ
                                                                                                                O QC
                                                                                                                1/1
                                                                                                                »-t  C
                                                                                                                CC O
                                                                                                                
-------
These quantities are, respectively, the measured oxidant, nitrogen dioxide


and sulfur dioxide concentrations.  There is a possibility of an overcorrection


for sulfur dioxide if it exceeds the real ozone concentration.  However, this


is very unlikely in daylight hours for the locations used because of the


routinely low sulfur dioxide concentrations experienced.


          The close agreement between adjusted oxidant and ozoa  concentrations


indicated that the contribution to the oxidant measurement by PAN or other


oxidants is very low at the locations involved.  This is as expected as


far as photochemical sources of these other oxidants is concerned.  Agreement


between the unadjusted oxidant and ozone is also good, but this may be partly


becuase interferences by N0_ and SCL compensated for one another.


          In a recent study made by the Research Triangle Institute under


contract with the U.S. Public Health Service, the chemiluminescent method for

                                 99 IQQ
ozone was used in several cities.  '      The mean hourly ozone concentrations


for each of these cities during the period of sampling are shown in Figure 5-16.


The diurnal patterns on selected days for the Denver and Philadelphia CAMP


sites are shown in Figure 5-17.  The physical appearance of these curves


tends to indicate a high degree of similarity to typical total oxidant traces.


          The data so far available would seem to indicate that, by using caution,


total oxidant data can be used to judge air quality effects related both to


those based upon ozone and oxidant, there are situations where p^irive


interference from sulfur dicxl.1 -  .v,J rcsii^.3 interference from other oxidants


eouJd cause difficulties in data interpretation.  For this reason it would be


desirable to continue both laboratroy and field studies on more specific methods


ior ozone.

                                     5-69

-------
              I      I
f-s. !*•*. • — » f*-**
• to to r**. 10
0 -x ">% <£> ^
O r— \  •—
5E r— 1 >~> O\ UJ r—
O 1 ^ >— J —II
^f~* 00 VjO *^C r*1^ i-i-iJ r^v
Ol^->^«a=<^'t3t£> l>l
Z -^. CXt*°- Z^ Z«^ 1 »
HI || Ld i— i— i IT) < CM I
OOOZOZ^.tOr— 1 L
3ec. Sc. G2. 3~ ^ i
/ '*
-&
	 — -— fc^
^ — --* — ^^y^
^-*^ >" yA
x^" / <[
~ o
§ °
UJ
U. Z
0 0
.co uj o
                                                                                VO
                                                                                in
CM"—    o2Jcor~vom'*cocoi—
,-•—    r=-ooooooooo
                       (Hdd)  bO  -
                                                                                          *



                                                                                           *
                                   5-70

-------
                                         w
                                         w
                                         o
                                         w
                                         o
                                         w
                                         H
                                         w
                                         u
                                         z
                                         o
                                         CJ

                                         w
                                         a
                                         o
                                         N
                                         O

                                         fa
                                         O
                                          S
                                          a
                                          r^
                                          i—(
                                           I
                                           3
                                           00
                                           •H
5-71

-------
    4.  Observed Contaminant Concentrations



        a.  Oxidant



          Information in the previous subparagraphs has shown that the shape



of the diurnal and seasonal oxidant concentrations are generally similar



over a broad geographic spectrum of locations.  However, on the basis of



presently available data, the frequency of occurrence and the severity of ozone



and other oxidant episodes varies considerably among even the larger metropolitan



areas.



          Table 5-4 gives the cumulative distribution of hourly mean oxidant



levels for the six CAMP cities and five locations in California for the period



1964-1965.  One fact immediately apparent is that the yearly average concen-



trations vary over a much smaller range than does the value which is exceeded



1 percent of the time at each location.  In fact, the range over which the



yearly averages vary is little different from that observed in remote, sparsely



populated areas (see Chapter 2).  A prime reason for this apparent anomaly



is that the yearly averages are unduly weighted by nighttime values.  In



locations having substantial photochemical air pollutions problems, ozone-



scavenging compounds (principally NO) are injected into the atmosphere with



the late afternoon traffic with t.   result that nighttime ozone values are



often very low.



          Table 5-5 shows, for the same locations as in Table 5-4, the number



of days with maximum hourly oxidant averages exceeding the. levels 0.15, 0.10 and



0.05 ppm.  The number of days with at least one hourly average above 0.15 ppm



oxidant is an order of magnitude greater for Pasadena and Los Angeles as
                                                I




                                     5-72

-------
   Table 5-4.  CUMULATIVE HOURLY AVERAGE OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS (1964-J965).
    City
Pasadena
Los Angeles
San Diego
Denver*
St. Louis
Philadelphia
Sacramento
Cincinnati
Santa Barbara
Washington, D.C.
San Francisco
Chicago
Percent of Hours with Concentrations
Equal to or Greater than Stated
Concentrations , ppm
90 70
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
50
.02
.02
.03
.03
.03
.02
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
30
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
.03
.04
.04
.04
.03
.03
.03
10
.12
.10
.08
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.04
.05
5
.18
.14
.10
.08
.07
.08
.08
.07
.08
.07
.05
.06
2
.23
.18
.12
.10
.09
.11
.10
.08
.09
.09
.06
.08
1
.26
.22
.14
.12
.11
.14
.12
.10
.10
.10
.07
.08
Yearly
Average
(1964-1965)

0.042
.036
.036
.036
.031
.026
.030
.030
.036
.029
.019
.028
* Eleven months of data beginning February, 1965
Source:  See Reference 38 and 39
                                     5-73

-------
                Table 5-5.   OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS (1964-1965).
Station

Pasadena
Los Angeles
San Diego
Denver*
St. Louis
Philadelphia
Sacramento
Cincinnati
Santa Barbara
Washington, D.C.
San Francisco
Chicago
Days with Maximum Hourly Average Equal to Maximum Peak
or Greater Than Concentration Specified Hour Average Concentrations
0.15 ppm 0.10 ppm
Days Percent
299 41.1
220 30.1
35 5.6
14 4.9
14 2.4
13 2.3
16 2.3
10 1.6
11 1.5
7 1.2
6 .9
0 0
Days Percent
401 55.1
354 48.5
130 20.9
51 17.9
59 10.1
60 10.9
104 14.6
55 9.0
76 10.5
65 11.3
29 4.5
24 4.5
0.05 ppm
Days Percent
546 75.0
540 74.0
440 70.6
226 79.3
362 62.2
233 41.9
443 62.3
319 52.0
510 70.5
313 54.2
185 28.6
269 50.8
(ppm)

0.46
0.58
0.38
0.25
0.35
0.21
0.26
0.26
0.25
0.21
0.18
0.13
(ppm)

0.67
0.65
0.56
0.31
0.85
0.25
0.45
0.32
0.28
0.24
0.22
0.19
* Eleven months of data beginning February, 1965
                                     5-74

-------
compared to the other ten cities.  The unusually high peak value of 0.85 ppm
for St. Louis has been referred to earlier.  This statibn is located near a
large chemical complex, with the distinct possibility that this'high concentration
—as well as others—may be due to interferring emissions from some unidentified
source.
          Other oxidant information is presented for the same twelve cities in
Table 5-6.  The month having the highest mean oxidant concentration, the overall
mean for the month, and the mean of the maximum hourly concentrations are shown.
          Data for the CAMP locations for the years 1966-1967 plus several
locations reporting to the USPHS New York-New Jersey Abatement Project for
1967 or 1968 are shown in Table 5-7.  This information is in the same form
as Table 5-4, showing number of days with at least one hourly average equal
to or exceeding the state levels.  While some year-to-year variation is
Indicated for the CAMP stations, it is not ususual.  The three locations in
the New York Metropolitan Area show oxidant levels that fit within the range
of the CAMP cities.
          Data for a number of contaminants were recently assembled by the
California Air Resources Board prior to Hearings on State Air Quality Standards.
This included a report by month and year for 1967 on the number of days the
maximum hourly oxidant concentration at each of 39 stations exceeded 0.10 ppm.
Every station in the state except Berkeley, Richmond, and San Franci'
exhibited maximum hourly averages above this level for at least 5 percent of
the days.  In many locations in Los Angeles County this level is exceeded
on more than 50 percent of the days.  One or more stations in Orange, Riverside,
                                     5-75

-------
     Table 5-6.   HIGHEST MONTHLY MEAN OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS (1964-1965).
   Station
Highest Month
 (all hours)
    Mean of Hourly
Average Concentrations
        (ppra)
    Mean of Maximum
Hourly Concentrations
       (ppmi
Pasadena
Los Angeles
San Diego
Denver*
St. Louis
Philadelphia
Sacramento
Cincinnati
S.mta Barbara
Washington, D.C.
San Francisco
Chicago
July
August
October
July*
May
July
June
July

May
May
April
0.075
0.056
0.050
0.050
0.042
0.054
0.040
0.048
0.042**
0.041
0.031
0.044
0.24
0.17
0.11
0.11
0.072
0.11
0.075
0.098
0.064 and .072
0.072
0.046
0.070
* Eleven months of data beginning February, 1965

** 1964-1965 average for month of May the same as for September
                                     5-76

-------
00

vO
                                        ON \O  OO   O\ rH  cs) ul   f>*O  vO  vO  00  tX)  O
                                        •H *H  .H «N   * CM  »-t  CM  ,-4  •-*  CS


                                        oo  od   do  do   do  oo  o  o  o
                            sa

                           A*
                              IA
                            0) fH
                            00  •
                            n o
                            i*


                           I
                                                      ifN   CN CO  moo  t^-r^  O
                                                      -.-4   m CN  roro  O

                                        lA rH  *O CN  00 t-.
                                                                               m  O  o

                                                                               00  CO  r^.



                                                                               ON  ON  ON
  i


  ai
                                                                         c

                                                                         o
                                                                         u

                                                                         •!»
                                                                                                00
                                                     5-77

-------
San Bernardino, and San Diego Counties exceeded 0.1 ppm for more than 100



days during 1967.



        b.  Nitrogen Oxides



          Air quality data for these contaminants are limited to nitrogen



dioxide (NO-) and nitric oxide (NO).  The method used, whether manually or



instrumentally performed, is based upon the formation of a colored, organic



reaction product of NO-.  Most data are from continuous analyzers which deter-



mine both NO. and NO on the same instrument, the NO being determined as NO

            *                                                             2


after passing through an oxidation unit.  There are several flow schemes in


                                                                 102
use which may produce information not strictly comparable for NO.     These



schemes are diagrammed below.





            1)  Series Flow;
Air
Stream
N02
Column


NO
Converter


NO
Column
            2)  Parallel (Mod. 1);
                                 NO


>"
2
Column .

NO
Converter



N0+N02
Column


                                     5-78

-------
            3)  Parallel (Mod. 2);
                         Column
                         Scrubber
  NO
Converter
  NO
Column
OnLy the first two schemes are used to any extent, with the series approach
predominating.  In scheme 2) the NO must be determined by difference.
          Of the two compounds, NO  is the most concern in ragard to direct
effects.  However, by far the greatest portion of nitrogen oxides emissions
is in the form of nitric oxide (see Chapter 2), which is therefore of prime
importance in the photochemical reaction process.  Data are presented
below for both NO- and NO, and for their sum expressed as nitrogen oxides.
          Table 5-8 shows nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide data from the
CAMP network in the form of cumulative frequency distributions of 5-minute
values for the year 1966.  The same type of information from selected cities
in the State of California SCAN network is shown in Table 5-9, except
 hat the concentrations represent 1-hour averages and the data arc sepals, sd
according to summer and winter.  Please note that nitrogen-dioxide and nitrogen
oxides (sum of NO and NO ) are reported.
          Data on nitrogen dioxide only were available from several stations
                                     5-79

-------
  U


  o
U vO
H O\
33 W
 i a
m M
  x
u. o
o M
  e»
w
i'. yi
o w

r:8

§g
M h-l
nd %
H
W Q
M S
Q -2

tw tJ
U O
X M
W X

§.°
W u
fi
  a!
  H
W M
> «
M  I
H  I
*t in
rJ M


^
sd
u >
oo
 I
,a
ca
H





I» Q
15
o «
> r.
U
O 41
U

a o
at U
u
r* "9
« V
a, u
i tg
i u
C (A
O
•H q
** a
5 P
W (A
W ID
(0 0)
Q
>» O
O
a o
3

23
(*4 0*
U]







5

u



u
H
Jflj -j «^r o vf> so-*  •• ••
0 00 0» mrx (^m
O\ rHO  oo oo oo oo
O OCN (N(*> rHCN O«N
H OO OO OO OO

r-
•H
•H .-
4J 1.
(0 C«l tN . 4 CM
gig s>§i x : ,,gg
•H flj PI OJ
O U r >
a -H •»-. c
•H j: jz 
-------
Table 5-9.
CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF HOURLY AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS
OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND NITROGEN OXIDES (1967 SCAN).
I City Frequency Percent

No Sunimrr
Winter
NO Summer
* Winter
Pasadena
NO Summer
Winter
NO -Summer
x Winter
NO- Summer
Winter
NO Summer
x Winter
San Diego
NO, Summer
Winter
NO Summer
* Winter
Riverside
NO. Summer
Winter
NO Summer
x Winter
Oakland
NO Sununer
Winter
NO Summer
x Winter
10

.02

.05


.02

.04

.01






.00

.01
.01

.02


.01

.02
30
.03
.04

.10



.05

.02
.02
.02





.02

.02
.02
.04
.04


.02
.OJ
.04
50

.06
.08
.16

.05
.05
.07
.11

.03
.03
.05


.02

.04

.04
.03
.06
.08

.02
.03
.04
.oa
70
.06
.08
.11
.27

.06
.08
.10
.18
.03
.05
.04
.10

.01

.01
.08

.06
.04
.09
.12

.03
.05

.14
90
.09
.15
.20
.49

.09
.14
.15
.32
.04
.07
.07
.22

.02
.05
.04
.22

.09
.08
.13
.21

.06
.08
.09
.28
95
.11
.21
.24
.63

.11
.19
.17
.39
.05
.09
.09
.32

.03
.07
.07
.30

.10
.12
.15
.26

.08
.11
.12

Maximum
.43
.54
.86
1.34

.20
.37
.34
.71
.15
.30
.32
1.14

.34
.24
.34
.84

.25
.31
.31
.67

.26
.33
.48
1.06
Arithmel^
Mean
.05
.08
.10
.22

.06
.07
.09
.15
.03
.04
.04
.10

.01
.02
.02
.08

.05
.04
.08
.10

.03
.05
.05

                                    5-81

-------
                             CM
                     a
                     v
                     u
                     tj
                     0)
                              IT)
                                           U"> in
                                           o o
                                                                          rH O
a

lA


 > a)  M
                                           rH  O  M
                                            D  0)  (U
                                           *~) Q r^
       M
       01
      ,0

 a  x oi  M
 d I-H  u  n>
 O  3  41   o»
                                              5-82

-------
cooperating in the New York-New Jersey Abatement Study for the year 1967.




Freqeuncy distribution data were available by the month.  This information




is shown in Table 5-10.




          Examination of Tables 5-8 and 5-9 indicate that for many cities



the long term (annual) mean nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide concentrations




are nearly equal.  Nitric oxide, however, exhibits higher maxima and lower




minima.  This results from its injection into the atmosphere as a primary




contaminant, often during times of reduced mixing capacity.  During photo-




chemical reaction it may nearly disappear.  Nitrogen dioxide, on the other




hand, is formed photochemically and is subject to simultaneous atmospheric




mixing processes.  Its rate of disappearance is slower than nitric oxide,




but this too is subject to specific reaction and mixing conditions.




          Peak values of nitric oxide above 1 ppm are experienced on a rather




widespread basis.  Nitrogen dioxide concentrations have rarely reached this




level, with most of the known such occasions having occurred in the Los Angeles




area.  In most major urban areas, peak NO  concentrations are under 0.5 ppm.




          Recalling Table 5-5, the two stations in the Los Angeles area had



higher oxidant levels more frequently than the other cities listed.  The




same situation does not hold in the case of the nitrogen oxides.  Although



exact comparisons cannot be made in each case, examination of Tables 5-8,




5-9, and 5-10 shows that Chicago, Bayonne and Newark have nicrogen oxide




patterns not unlike those of Los Angeles and Pasadena.
                                     5-83

-------
        c.  Hydrocarbons




          In examining atmospheric hydrocarbon concentrations in relation to




photochemical smog, several factors must be considered.  First, as discussed



in Chapter 2, there is an enormous variation in the tendency for different




hydrocarbons to enter into the photochemical smog reaction sequence, some




(like methane) being virtually inert.  Second, the simpler and less laborious




atmospheric hydrocarbon detection methods are likely to respond most strongly




to methane and other alkanes.  Third, methane is very often more abundant




than all other hydrocarbons combined; there is, in fact, apparently a




"geophysical" minimum worldwide level of methane of about 1.0-1.5 ppm.   '   *'




This makes it important in assessing photochemical air pollution to be able




to discriminate between methane and other more reactive hydrocarbons.




Unfortunately this type of analysis is expensive and time-consuming, so that




such data are not abundant.  Nevertheless it is available, and in this sub-




paragraph such observations are discussed.




          Although on occasion all other hydrocarbon concentrations drop



to unmeasurably low levels, methane does not.  There have been numerous




measurements in remote, sparsely populated areas and far out on the ocean




which all suggest a worldwide minimum mi  ^ne concentration of about 1.0 to




1.5 ppm.  "Natural" sources of methane  a:c mostly vegetation, especially




1n swampy areas.  In inhabited areas methane levels are normally much higher;




values of 6 ppm or more have been     observed.  This is attributed to escape




from petroleum and natural gas, although small amounts also result from combustion




processes.






                                     5-84

-------
          Ratios of nonmethane hydrocarbons (as carbon) to methane have been



estimated for urban areas, after subtracting 1 ppm from methane values to



allow for estimated biogenic background levels   .  The nonmethane/methane



hydrocarbon ratios for several weeks averaged 0.6 in Cincinnati and 1.9



in Los Angeles, although methane values were similar (Figure 5-18).  The



higher Los Angeles ratios evidently reflect the higher traffic densities.



          In Table 5-11, hydrocarbons up to C, to C, as averaged in over 200
                                             D     /


samples in the Los Angeles atmosphere (1) are tabulated on a molar basis.



Note the great preponderance of methane.  Even on a weight or carbon atom



basis, methane would constitute about half the total hydrocarbon fraction;



of the remainder, the saturated hydrocarbons (also relatively unreactive



photochemically) also predominate.  These samples were generally taken just



before or during the morning traffic rush.



          The proportion of aromatic to aliphatic    and some of the proportions


                                     108
among the aromatics have been studied   .  Table 5-12 shows (again for



Los Angeles) averages for aromatic concentrations observed in the atmosphere



over several weeks sampling.



          In Table 5-13 the diurnal patterns are given for the C~ - C,.



hydrocarbons, showing the hour-by-hour variations averaged over some weeks



in the Los Angeles smog season.  All species listed reached a maximum in the



morning, then declined through the midday (although there are irrc;t,,Parities


                V99
in certain types)
                                     5-85

-------
                   Sourcc-ttn nQih rutiot lor non
-------
Table  5-11.   AVERAGE  HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION--218  LOS ANGELES
                AMBIENT  AIR SAMPLES (1965).
       Methane
       Ethane
       Propane
       Isobutane
       r»-Butane
       Isopentane
       n-Pentane
       2,2-Dimethylbutane
       2-Methylpentane
       2,3-Dimathy1 butane
       Cyclopentanu
       3-Methylpen Cane
       n-Hexane
            Alkanes (beyond methane)
       Ethyiene
       Propone
       1-lluLane -f Isobutylene
       trans-2-Butane
       cJhs-2-Butane
       1-Pentene
       2-Methyl-l-Butane
       trans-2-Pentene
       cls-2-I'entene
       2-Melhyl-2-Butene
       Propatllene
       1,3-Bntadlene
            Alkenes
       Acetylene
       Mctliylrfcctylene
            Ai elyIt-no
       Brnzonc
       Toluene
            Aromatics
                              TOTAL
Concentration, ppm Molar
                3.22
         .098
         .OA9
         .013
         .064
         .043
         .035
         .0012

         .014
         .004
         .1)08
         .012
                                                                  ppm in Methane
                                                                      3.22
                  .3412
         .060
         .018
         .007
         .0014
         .0012
         .002
         .002
         .003
         .0013
         .004
         .0001
         .002

         .039
         .0014

         .032
         .053
.]020
.0404
                  .0850
                 3.7886
                                      5-87

-------
   Table  5-12.   AVERAGE AND HIGHEST CONCENTRATION MEASURED
                   FOR VARIOUS AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS.
                               Average Concentration        Highest Measured
Aromatic  Hydrocarbon               ppm by Volume      Concentration, ppm by Volume

Benzene                             0.01S                     0.057
Toluene                             0.037                     0.129
Ethylbenzene                         0.006                     0.022
£-Xylene                             0.006                     0.025
m-Xylene                             0.016                     0.061
o-Xylene                             0.008                     0.033
1-Propylbenzene                      0.003                     0.012
£-Propylbenzene                      0.002                     0.006
3- and 4-Ethyltoluene                0.008                     0.027
l,3,i-Trimethylbenzene               0.003                     0.011
1,2,4-TrimethyIbenzene,
  i-Butyl- and Sec-Butylbenzene       0.009                     0.030
tert-Butylbenzlne                    0.002                     0.006

     Total Aromatics                 0.106                     0.33
                                    5-88

-------
 I
 I
CO
25
O
W
o
§
u
o
o
Q  -I
H

O
ya
P<  W
w  p
D-,    o
4(NrHrHrHFHrHrH>H>-H
                                 •H

                                 •H


                                 fl
                                 O

CO CO *A sO 00 00 O 00 00 F"* rH rH    C    r^*» sO Csl -J" iA \D C>| 00 r^ lA iA \O
rHrHtNirMO>rHooor*-osooo    nJ    oOf^OOOvOsO^o^sOr^r^f^.
rHrHrHrHrHrH      rH      t/1         rH


                                 w

                                 2













f* "^  n C>4 C*4 rH rH rH fS (*4


















oooooooooooo         oooooooooooo
OOOO'j'yOOC  OOO         OOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOO—*rHrH»-
-------
          Very few comparison studies have been conducted of hydrocarbon



concentrations among various geographical locations.  The study of Altshuller,



Ortman, et al. compared methane and nonmethane hydrocarbons in Cincinnati
                                                  1


and Los Angeles.  Stephens and Burleson    have determined the hydrocarbon



compositions for a number of air samples from widely scattered locations:



Hawaii, Denver, New York, and Monterey-Salinas (California), as well as Riverside



in Southern California.  There are apparently substantial differences in



proportions of individual hydrocarbons which may sometimes, but not always, be



related to known differences in source contributions and extent of atmospheric



reaction.  However, there is much not yet fully explained in such data.



          Laboratory work shows that in the photochemical reaction system there



is a wide difference in the rate of disappearance br reaction of various



hydrocarbons.  These differences, for single hydrocarbons at least, may be



related to structure:  olefins and most aromatics are reactive, higher



alkanes not very reactive, while benzene, acetylene and lower alkanes are



virtually  inert.  In the atmosphere these differences have been harder to



observe.  Since the general effects of meteorological dilution plus continuing



source emission obscure the effects of reaction,     Stephens and Burleson



studied the reaction of trapped a""•'•>    ric samples, artifically irradiated,



and found that reactivities were much as expected from laboratory results.



See Table 5-14.



          The same authors    as well as others   '      have also attempted



to correlate observed atmospheric hydrocarbon concentrations with known



emission sources,  In general three sources—auto exhaust, natural gas, and





                                     5-90

-------
  Table  5-14.   COMPARISON  OF RESULTS  FROM  THE  ULTRAVIOLET
                  IRRADIATION OF AMBIENT AIR  SAMPLES.
Compound s
1' 111 ane
htham'
I'ropune
Prupcne
Pro p. me
Propone
Isobutam*
ii-bulani-
Aretyl ene
I butane
i ->obut t* ni1
1 r.in-.-2-hu t fnr
1 soprn t anf'
i:is- J -huti-nr
n-pt>n tarn**
1 , )-|>llt .III 1 I'lll
Mr 1 In. 1 .uvt v. li iu-
.', .'-I1 IllU'tllV 1 1)11 1 .1111'
J -pi'p t rat*
2-mi'tlivl buti'HP-1
trnns-2-penti'iii'
2 , 3-ilii'H'thyl butnnu
2-mc'ihvl pcnt.im-**
i-mt-i hvl pi'ntjrx ***
Cycli p-'iitani-
T-lli- .llli'
Cyc l.^-'TiCt-'no
Concentration tn ppb
12/22/65 3/3/66
Percent
0 hour 2h hour Remain 0 hour 24 hour
38.5
134.2
17.4
35.4
21.6
48.'.
25..'
119.0
310.5
6.4
11. ti
(..li
93.6
-', . 5
60.0
t.'parated on chromatograph No. 2; remainder on
      chronuit i<^' r'ipb  No. 1 -
   ( . >ni .1 ins  i-. u-i n v I hut me- 1
** ( -in t.» ins  t ; -,

***(,., n t.i ins  .'-IM
              thyl
                                  5-91

-------
gasoline vapor—,  will account qualitatively for the observations.  The




quantitative agreement shows some discrepancies, however.  (There is often




an apparent excess of alkanes in the propane range over known source contributions.)




These are not thought to be of great significance in atmospheric photochemistry,




since these low-molecular weight alkanes are only very slightly reactive in




the system, compared to unsaturated hydrocarbons.




          Although details remain to be explained, the role of various hydro-




carbons in atmospheric photochemistry is generally clear.




        d.  PAN




          Utilizing gas chromatographic techniques with an electron capture




detector, PAN concentrations were measured in Los Angeles during September




and October 1965 by the California State Department of Public Health.




Seven measurements per day were made for each of the 16 weekdays in September




and 19 weekdays in October.  The average concentrations by hour of day for




these periods are shown in Figure 5-19.  The measurements were made near the




central Los Angeles air monitoring station, and the oxidant concentrations




are shown for comparison with the PAN concentration^.




          Beginning in June 1966, measurements of PAN have been made on the




campus of the University of Calif., ai;..  it Riverside using the gas chromatograph




and electron capture method describ    m ^aragraph G. of this chapter.  Samples




are usually collected once each hour between 7:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. PST.




Other pollutants are also measured at the station operated by .ae Riverside




Air Pollution Research Center and supported by the U.S. Public Health Service.




In Figure '>-20, the average oxidant concentrations, measured with a Mast






                                     5-92

-------
        0.20r
        0.18
        0-.16
        0.14
        0.12
     c
     o
        0.10
     u
     o  0.08
        0.06
        0.0-1
        0.02
Averages -.

19 weekdays,
 October
16 weekdays,
 September
           oi—
       I	I
                8      9       10      11      12
                      _^1_-..._T_^,_.I,_ A  I ( 	     _     -
                   "	-"^-----r-™--,.- ^ . n,            	•• *~
                                     123
                                    	P.M.	*
                               Hour  of day, PST.
Figure 5-19.  OXIDANT AND PAN CONCENTRATIONS BY HOUR OF DAY—DOWNTOWN
              LOS  ANGELES—(1965).
                                    5-93

-------
Oxirtitnt
pp::i
0 . 1 6 r-
0. 1 1
 0.12
        M<>n:hl\  '.run hourly
                  ii.coat rat i
      ,JVIDA::T A.\U PAX  COXCLNHATIONS BY HOUR  OF DAY AIR POLLUTION
               CEXTER—RIVERS LDi., CALIFORNIA—(1966) .
                             5-94

-------
   Table 5-15.*  AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF PAN-
                 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA—(AUGUST 1967-APRIL 1968).
Month
August, 1967
September
October
November
December
January, 1968
February
March
Apr i I
August
(24-hour)
5.9
5.1
7.0
6.9
0.9
0.8
1.4
3.4
3.1
August3
(10-hour)
7.9
6.7
7.4
8.1
1.2
1.0
1.3
3.5
4.0
Maximum
(Month)
28
34
43
58
12
8
25
38
21
a Average for 10-hour period, 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.

* From J. APCA, L9, 348 (May 1969).
                                5-95

-------
analyzer (see paragraph C.)> and the average PAN concentrations are shown by

hour for the month of September, 1966.   Similar data for October 1966 are

also shown in Figure 5-20.  The monthly mean oxidant and PAN concentrations and

the monthly mean of the daily maximum hourly averages are shown in Figure 5-21.

          In Figure 5-20 there are two daily maxima for the oxidant and PAN

concentrations.  As previously discussed, the second maximum may be due to the

transport of pollutants from Los Angeles to Riverside.  The PAN concentrations

in Riverside are an order or magnitude lower than those in Los Angeles, while the

concentration of oxidants are the same order of magnitude.

          Additional data have been reported recently on PAN concentrations
                                             114
in Riverside during late 1967 and early 1968.     Included was an 18-day period

in November 1967 when an extended atmospheric stagnation episode resulted

In the highest concentration of PAN recorded to that time.  This level,

53 ppb, is still substantially lower than levels which have been observed in

Los Angeles.  A summary of the 1967-68 data is given in Table 5-15.

        e.  Aldehydes

          Of all the principal reaction products formed in the atmosphere by

photochemical processes,  the aldehydes are among the most poorly quantified.

By far most of the available data are from Los Angeles, where for  the period

1951-1957 aldehydes were  regularly   T...    i using manual techniques.

Total aldehydes were determined by  the bisulfite procedure    and  reported

as formaldehyde, while formaldehyde was determined by the chromotropic acid

procedure.     Table 5-16 shows the rang»i of maximum concentrations obtained

over this period.  Typical maximum  concentrations were nearer the  low end of
                                     5-96

-------
                                       ••; P   O     00     U3      O
                                                                                                   e  o
                                                                                                   O  vO
                                                                                                   O  rH
                                                                                                      I
                                                                                                    «o
                                                                                                  4J  O
                                                                                                   tn  vn
                                                                                                   nj  o
                                                                                                   c  c
                                                                                                   (0  a)
                                                                                                  'O  3

                                                                                                   X  ai
                                                                                                  O  a'-
ai
u
o
                                                                                                                           a
                                                                                                                           hH
                                                                                                                           co
                                                                                                                           U4
                                                                                                                           H
                                                                                                                           a!
                        O
                        M
                        H   •
                        !-J ^^
                        nJ  W
                        ,-J  >
                        O  H
                        Cl<  CO
                        M  O
                        <  v.
                            i-t
                        V)
                        ^   «
                        O  r-.
                        hH  »^D
                        f—t  O^
                        ^C  «~H

                        H  W

                        W  3
                        O  *~j
                        •z
                        O  X
                        U  0


                        3  °

                            H
                        Q

                        •-i  VD
                            ON
                        H  ^-i


                        Q  X
                        rH  LJ
                        X  "I
                        O  ^
                                                                                                                           ri
                                                                                                                            I
                                                                                                                           00
                                                                                                                           •H
                                                                                                                           u,
                                                    5-97

-------
       Table 5-16.  RANGE OF MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS OF ALDEHYDES AND
                    FORMALDEHYDE—LOS ANGELES COUNTY™(1951-1957) .*
^ear                             Concentration Range (ppm)
                         Formaldehyde                  Total Aldehydes

 1951                        .05 - .12                     .26 - .67
 L952                                                      .20 - .27
 1953                                                      .25-1.20
 1954                                                      .39 - .80
 1955                                                      .47 -1.28
 1956                                                      .51 -1.30
 1957                                                      .27 - .47
* From "Air Quality of Los Angeles," J. E. Dickinson, Technical Progress
  Report, Volume II, Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District  (1961)
                                      5-98

-------
the range, although ,-ivailable data are insufficient to provide a complete




characterization.


                             118
          A cooperative study    jointly sponsored by the Air Pollution Control




District of Los Angeles County and the Air Pollution Foundation during the




period July-November 1960 provided limited data on total aldehydes, formalde-



hyde and acrolein using the bisulfite, chromotropic acid, and 4-hexybesorcinol




procedures, respectively.  Total aldehydes ranged up to 0.36 ppm for a 10-




mlnute sample, while formaldehyde did not exceed 0.10 ppm.  Typical aldehyde




concentrations were near 0.10 ppm on many days.  The maximum acrolein value was




0.011 ppm, with most values being less than half that amount.




          Aldehyde concentrations tend to peak near the time of the oxidant




maximum but this is not always the case, particularly in the winter season.




Tlu'y are produced both as primary contaminants from incomplete combustion and




in the photochemical process, so that a varied diurnal and seasonal pattern




is not unexpected.  Because their importance has not been fully assessed and




bec.-iuso limited sampling data are available, additional effort is necessary




to determine the influence aldehydes will have in setting air quality—and



hence emission—standards for photochemical reactants.




    5.  Trends in Photochemical Air Contaminants




          The time serves analysis of air quality data involves at 1ft_iSt four



components of variation:  (1) eC'cuai trends, (2) cyclical variations, (3)




seasonal variations, and (4) random fluctuations.  The ability to determine




possible trends in air quality rests upon the extent to which cyclical,
                                      5-99

-------
seasonal, and random variations can be accounted.  The assumption generally



made is that these latter three sources of variation are due to measurement



and meteorological variables and that any remaining indication of trend



is likely due to a real change in contaminant loading in the atmosphere.



          It seems almost certain, based upon the experience of those who


                                                                119
have examined precipitation data and other atmospheric phenomena   , that



there is an insufficient time record of photochemical air contaminant data



to arc-ount for any possible long-term cycles.  On the other hand there is



little, or no evidente of any truly cyclical behavior of any of the meteorological



parameters which might affect the concentration of air contaminants.



          Seasonal variations in air contaminant levels in the atmosphere



are present for many contaminants and have been referred to earlier in this



section.  Several approaches may be used to account for this factor, the



most common being the 12-month moving average.  When data for several years



is available, an average "seasonal index" may be calculated and applied, for



example, to monthly means to obtain "deseasonalized" monthly values.



          The remaining and most troublesome source of difficulty in determining



possible trends is that of random variation.  In the evaluation of visibility



trends in Los Angeles over the period 1  ',1 - 1958 reported by Holzworth and


     PO
Mag.i *~  a trend of reduced visibilities was shown over the period from



1932 - 1948.  Visual examination of the data suggests that the trend was



not clearly established until 1940, or a period of eight years.  Further



evidence of the difficulty in evaluating possible trend information relating



to photochemical air contaminants is shown in several figures reproduced from




                                     5-100

-------
                         121
a report by Ingels. eL al    on atmospheric  trends  of  nitrogen oxides.



Flgun- 5-22., shows a "Jeast squares"  linear  trenc*  line fitted to raw monthly



dat i fiora di.wmtowii Los Angeles while  Figure  5-22b  shows a subjectively fitted



trend curve applied to "deseasonalized" monthly data.   Figures 5-23a and 5-23b



stun; t.lie sai e information for data  from an air monitoring station in Burbank



(about 10 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles).   Even though there was



a siight im rease in nitrogen oxides  emissions in  the  County of Los Angeles



during this ;.ime period, no ea.^y  interpretation of  this data seems possible.



          Ti"ud data on oxidant and nitrogen dioxide for several cities in


                                                                          122
New Jersey ;.re shown for the period 1966 - 1968 in  Figures 5-24 and 5-25.



Although a v>-ry slight trend downward seems  evident  for oxidant, no significant



i:oiuidunce rould bo attached to that  statement.  Table 5-17 presents on a



yearly basis,  the maximum hourly  average concentration and the number of



davs wlit-n the maximum hourly average  for oxidant exceeded specified valjes


                                                  123
at each of t ue CAMP sites, from 1964  through 1967.      Again, no evidence



of (.ri'i-.ds is seen for any of the  sites over  the relatively short period



considered.



          Probably the longest time series of air quality data relating to



photochemical contaminants is that  from the  Los Angeles County Air Pollution



Control District.  Figure 5-26 presents for  the period 1955-1968, the yearly



numl'er of days exceeding specified  levels of oxidant and nifrogen c~ >xi
-------
      IX
      CX,
      w
      H
      M
      S5
      M
      Q
      M
      X ,0
           ilUUJJLLiU.1. lillilLUJliJ.UiJ..1 iOi-UJiL
iLUlLlL
 IM7     '
UUULLI1
   1961     '
                                      MONTH
Figure 5-2Ja.   MONTHLY MEAN DAILY MAXIMUM NO , CIVIC CENTER, 1957-1961.

               TREND, +8.6 PPHM/YEAR.       X
                                                           SIGNIFICANT
        »<> a —
Figure 5-2.'h.
       -'• J' ; * J M ' ' J ' H '  ..'uJ-LL.' ' w.' !   ' ] - ' ' ' '

             Jii'.H     '    )•,,.>     !    I'l'"    '    I'.f.l    '

                        MONTH

 TREND CURVES  FITTED TO "DESEASONALIZED" MONTHLY MEAN DAILY MAXIMUM

 NO  DATA,  LOS ANGELES CIVIC CENTER,  STATIONS 1 AND 58, 1957-1961.
                                       b-102

-------
                      LJlLLUlL'JJJJiUllUil .UiIiHJ.ll>1 J1LJ.U '.111 "
               t'JS7
JJJJiU
 '
                              .
                               '     r<(.o    '
                                                                    '
                                    MONTH
Fl«uru V;>;.,a.   MONTHLY  MEAN DAILY MAXIMUM NO , BURBANK, 1957-1961.   NO
               SIGNIFICANT TREND.           X
       '-23b.  TREND CURVES FITTED TO "DESEASONALIZED" MONTHLY MEAN  DAILY MAXIMUM
                                     :ION 9,

                                     5-103
NO  DATA,  BURBANK,  STATION 9,  1957-1961.
  fi

-------
&
PL,
W


§
a
M
X!
O
                          ijjyor.ne

                          Ancora

                       A  Camdcr.
          Oil   *•<  fik   Apr  J-«  A.j   On  D.i  f.k  Ap,  Jwn   A.«  O<|
            N..  J.«  Mw  Mo,  J.I  S.pl  N,.  J.n   tfe,  Mn  Jul  Snl  I
           1965
                            1966
                                                      1967
1C  F«b  Apr  JwH  Attf,  O(f  0
 J.«  Mv   Ufa,  J.I   i.,1  N..


            1960
                                     Figure  5-24.   QXIDANTS.
                                                  5-104

-------
                                  Monthly Avi_rj^
   J<<  ».k   A»<   J-.  A.<  O«  0..  f.k  A,,  J,.  A..  Ot
1965
              1966
1967
                Figure  5-25-   NITROGEN DIOXIDE.
                               5-105

-------
Table 5-17-  SUMMARY OF TOTAL OXIDANT CONCENTRATIONS RECORDED AT CAMP SITES,
             1964-1967.
City
Chicago



Ommiuli



Denver


I'lul.ulcli'liia



St l.Ollll



W.(.-.liii-.;i.,ii. IVC.



You
1964
1965
1966
1967
1964
1965
1966
1967
1965
1066
1967
1964
I'M 5
19^6
l')67
»9M
IVOS
1966
1967
l%»
1965
1966
1967
Days of
vihJ iUti
254
275
235
255
303
MO
">nn
22*
?S5
298
166
2f,9
266
315
2X2
253
129
292
2S9
293
284
125
3>2
Number of days with at least 1 hourly
aveujje equal to or exceeding
0.05 ppm
149
120
52
113
137
182
54
122
226
187
76
124
109
145
1 M
156
206
174
1S5
163
150
IJ1
1 17
O.lOppm
IS
9
6
16
36
19
1
24
51
46
12
37
23
52
28
26
33
33
38
•10
25
27
27
O.OlSppm
0
0
3
1
5
5
0
1
14
9
4
9
4
19
3
6
g
5
4
4
3
2
5
Maximum
hourly
ppm
0.13
0.12
0.19
016
026
0 17
0.10
020
02S
0 19
0.21
020
0 31
O.i2
017
.126
0 3$
022
0 20
• 120
0 '1
0 16
0 >6
                                      5-106

-------
                            DAYS MAX.  OXIDANT CONC.  EXCEEDED
                                               NO.  DAYS  N02  EXCEEDCJ

                                               0.25 PPM  FOR  1  HOUR
70
                                                NO. OF DAYS
                                                CONDUCIVE TO ACCUM.
                                                OF AIR CONTAMINANTS*
                                                  *DAYS WITH EARLY  MORNING
                                                   INVERSION S 1500 FT. MAX.
                                                   MIXING HT. * 35CO FT.
                                                   0600-1200 HP.S  WIND SPEED
                                                   •< 5.0 MPH.
55 b£ 57 S3
                   60  61  fi2  63
                        YEAR
65 65 67 68 69
   b-26  ANNUAL VARIATION IN NUMBER OF DAYS OXIDANT AND N02 EXCLEU STATED

         LEVELS rOGETHER WITH NUMBER OF DAYS CONDUCIVE TO ACCUMULATION OF

              ONTAMINANTS —LOS ANGELES BASIN.
                                 5-107

-------
            1.  Inversion base ^ 1500 feet.



            2.  Maximum mixing height •  ')SOO feet.



            3.  0600-1200 hours average.* wind speed <_ 5.0 mph.



          A very preliminary assessment would seem to indicate a decreasing



trend of days exceeding the stated oxidant level and increasing trend



in number of days exceeding the given NO  level.  It is obvious that there



is substantial random, or unaccounted for, year-to-year variation.  Taking



the meteorological parameters as an example (for which a trend does not seem



present) the standard deviation in the number of days meeting the high air



pollution potential criteria is 19.  This is approximately 20 percent of



the mean annual value of 94 days.  Several other precautions should be stated



regarding the interpretation of these data.  First, even though the data



presented are "Basin" data (a day is included if the specified level is



exceeded at any air monitoring station), there were changes in the number



and location of air monitoring stations over the time period involved.



Secondly, the possibility of localized influences on concentrations cannot



be completely eliminated.  Thirdly, it is accepted that the meteorologocal



criteria used to define high air pollution potential are at best rather crude.



          In summary it seems evident that really clear-cut trends in the



occurrence and concentrations of ph 'tocl.emical air contaminants are either



not present or require more powerful tools of analysis to be discerned.


                                           124
Serial correlation techniques normally used    or special toe1 3 such ,.,„


                                             125
power spectrum analysis as described by Brier    may have to be brought into



play.  Finally a substantial effort is still needed to account for the effects
                                     5-108

-------
of m.'ti.orc.logical nnu other photophysical influences on tue reaction , ud




aceuiiulatiou of photochemical contaminants in the atmosphere.




K.  DATA ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINING REGIONAL AIR QUALIT




    1.  Suggested Measurements




          The establishment of air quality criteria for e;ny one of tht possible




air contaminants occurring as a result of photochemical reaction has t gnifleant




implications insofar as atmospheric measurements are concerned.  Not i. ,ly




must that particular contaminant be characterized so as to enable inte.pretation




of significant expected effects, but the primary contaminants must be described




in terms of those concentration parameters to permit structuring and e*.aluation




of control implementation plans.  The potential number of possible meetureraents




is relatively great in number.  This is particularly true if an atmospheric




research capability is required.




          Fcr those areas in which the major objectives of an air quality data




acquisition program are (1) ability to evaluate air quality against criteria




and standards, and (2) ability to plan and evaluate contaminant control




implementation plans, the list may be narrowed.




          As a minimum, a program should involve the capability of obtaining




hourly mean values for oxidant, nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide, and hydrocarbons.




It would be highly desirable to make at least some nonroutine measurements




using one of the specific ozone methods to enable a more precise evaluation of




the oxidant data.  The potential effect of sulfur dioxide should be judged




and, if necessary, compensating measures taken.  If prescrubbers are nu.-essary,




the possibility of enhanced positive interference from oxidized nitric oxide




should be acknowledged.




                                     5-109

-------
          The major concern in the measurement of nitrogen oxides lies not in

problems of specificity, but in development of a capability to properly

calibrate and maintain presently available analyzers.

          The measurement of hydrocarbons is best made on the basis of obtaining

information on the reactive classes.  However, this 9bjective still remains a

challenge even for research-oriented organizations having substantial laboratory

resources.  In lieu of obtaining detailed information on specific hydrocarbons

by full gas chromatographic procedures,  the method used should at least separate

or remove methane from the remaining hydrocarbons,  ihe total hydrocarbon

analyzer based upon flame ionization and incorporating the accessories enabling
                                                     I
a specific measurement of methane is, for the present, the best routine approach.

          Wind speed and direction measurements will be necessary to interpret

air quality data in terms of sources and to facilitate construction or estimation
                                                     |

of overall community pollution patterns.  It will be desirable in many cases

to supplement the wind data available from ESSA or other sources with that

collected specifically for air quality evaluation purposes.

          Other measurements of photophysical parameters such as solar irradiation,

vertical temperature structure and other stability parameters will be useful.

It is particularly in this area that rr-wional, State and Federal cooperation

can be helpful in optimizing the util.ty rnd cost of the data.

    2.  Sampling Network Design
                         •»
          In theory, the establishment of an air sampling network should be

based upon (1) criteria for meeting program objectives; (2) desired confidence

in output data; (3) ability to relate sampling site measurements to sources

and receptors; (A) optimizing cost/effectiveness ratios; (5) site specifications;

arid (6) overall program balance.


                                      5-110

-------
          I i practice, economic factors and the relative complexity of at least




continuous uonitoring equipment have set the pattern for the acquisition of air




quality dat.i.  There has been an expansion of air sampling activity in recent




years, of course, particularly  in some of the major metropolitan areas mentioned




in the data discussions of this chapter.  But here, most of the expansion has




been related to particulate and sulfur oxides measurement.




          It seems prudent to assume in long-range planning of resourct allocation




that economic and manpower pressures will not permit the acquisition of




detailed information about every point in space and time in the atmosphere.




It is not, in the strictest sense, even possible to do so.  It is incuirbent




on us then to plan future networks with strict attention to objectives, to take




advantage of our knowledge of atmospheric behavior, and to apply interpretive




analysis tei hniques to the point that our expenditures for air quality data




actually contribute to the improvement in the quality of our environment.




          Insofar as community air pollution is concerned we can list several




prim ipal ol jectives of air monitoring, as follows:




            I.  Establishment of background data




            2.  Evaluation of criteria and standards




            3.  Development of control strategies and plans




            '4.  Evaluation of control programs




            ).  Development of acute incident warning




            (i.  F.stnM Lshment of source identification




            7.  Study of ntmo£-|ilse objt/i i Lves create varying requirements for measurement time




basi-s, sampling location density and distribution, for communications, and for




mtal information systems.  A review of a number of these factors has recently




appeared. '•"^




                                     5  111

-------
          A few examples may help illustrate the applicability of some of the



above factors.  First, let us assume we are Interested  -i obtaining mean



geophysical contaminant levels (worldwide background).  If 1000 stations were



to be established, the proportionate share for the United States (based upon



area) would be about 20.  We would be concerned with having great measurement



sensitivity and field suitability, but not necessarily with communications or



immediate use of the data.  Time response of the analyzer would be of little

                                                    i
importance and sampling could very well be intermittent.



          Second, we would consider the requirements I for providing an early



warning system against an acute incident involving the possible release of



toxic material from a point source.  In this case we would (1) use a very



concentrated geometric sampling grid; (2) require only moderate sensitivity;
                                                    !


(J) need rapid analyzer response; (4) use immediate communication links, and



(5) demand high reliability.



          The more typical community air monitoring network would fall some-



whore between these extremes.  The sampling grid will be affected by location of



sources and receptors and by local wind patterns; some—but not all—measure-



Hunts will necessitate the time response availability only from continuous



analyzers.  The need for systematic analysis of air sampling instrument require-



ments with a view towards best meeting future programs has been recognized



by many.  One particular scheme is illustrated by the systems chart in Figure



5-27-



          In determining whether a community or eir quality control region



meets or exceeds air quality standards, a basic question exists as to how well



any given air sampling system represents a true situation in the atmosphere.



Assuming no problems with methodology, the question can be expressed in terms



                                     5-112

-------
1
is
15
< *f
0 0 ~"
_ Ci- JJ
Q u_ x/i
^. ^ -) <
                                                 W H
                                                 > a
                                                 M W
                                                 Q £
                                                 H 2
                                                    M
                                                 a

                                                 M3
                                                 pi to
                                                 w M
                                                 o <
                                                 o
                                                 H M

                                                 CO <

                                                 o a-
                                                 H
                                                 U Oi
                                                 < M
5-113

-------
of the accuracy expected at a stipulated confidence level in using air quality

data from a network to estimate the contaminant concentration over a given time

base at a randomly selected point in time and space.

          One approach to solving this problem is exemplified by the analysis

by Stalker *   of data collected as part of a large-scale epidemiological study

conducted In Nashville.  Up to 119 sampling site locations were used enabling

the analysis of predictive approaches based upon varying numbers of stations.

As a result of this work the following equation was developed to estimate the

minimum number of stations required to obtain the confidence and accuracy
                                                     j
levels specified:
where N « minimum number of stations required, t - student "t" for specified


confidence interval,

     CV - coefficient of variation in percent


        « standard deviation x 100 (for normal distribution)
                mean


        - (antilog sgxlOO))-100  (for lognormal distributions, where sg « standard


          geometric distribution), and

      p - allowable departure in percent from true mean.

          As an example, it was determined that 245 stations would be required

(four per square mile) to estimate the daily mean concentration of SO^ at any


given point with 95 percent confidence of + 20 percent accuracy.   On the other


hand it was estimated that one central and one peripheral station woulf '>*>.


required to calculate seasonal means at. any point in the area.  This was based


upon the finding that the geographic cross-section of values gave an approximate


tit to the normal distribution curve.
                                      5-114

-------
                          1 28
                       i'y    c inducted by  the Los Angeles  County  Air  Pollution



Control District ut.ing one mobile and several fixed  stations  showed  t'..it  .sampling



locations up to 5 miles apart exhibited  instantaneous values  within + >  pphm



of one anotlii-r at  sll concentration levels.



          Otlier a^i-roacheb to estimating the number  of  sampling stations to



provide' a satisfactory discription of the  air quality of an area  are  lused


                                   129
upon atmosp'.cric simulation models.     Most of  these are  btatir  diff-ision



models and thus an- not adequate to handle contaminants exhibiting  significant



rates of reaction over the times used in the models.  Neverthele  s,  initial


                                   130
results of mode ling for Connecticut    and several of the  newly designated



air quality control regions    indicate the possible utility  of more  advanced



models.



          Oiu1 conclusion common to both the use  of statistical analysis  and



simulation model inc. techniques is that substantial field experimentation



iKTtleJ to develop (.he techniques and validate results.  The potential savings



aiui heuefits possible should encourage further work  in  these  areas.



    3.  Station Si tins
          A usual and sometimes unwarranted assumption made  about  air  quality



data Js tnai  it f i^rly represents a  reasonable area  surrounding  the  site.



Even though we know, as discussed in the previous  paragraph,  that  there  are



limits tu tills assumption, precautions  in  siting must be  taken  to  obtain results



not unduly influenced by highly localized  factors.



          Because physical requirements would usually preclude a purely



randomized site selection procedure,  the establishment of  some guidelines  are





                                     5-115

-------
desirable.   Factors most commonly considered can be classified as (1) external:




(a) height  above ground level of sampling point, (b) influence of surrounding




structures  or terrain on air flow, and (c) localized sources; and (2) internal:




(a) length  and type of sampling lines, and (b) analyzer environment.




         Generally, sample inlets should be 10 to 12 feet above ground to




avoid street dust from low-level turbulence and unmixed auto exhaust.  Higher




inlets should be evaluated in terms of atmospheric stability and representativeness




of principal receptor locations.  Sample locations closer than two building




heights from taller structures should be avoided to preclude stagnation areas




formed in the lee of such structures.  Strict rules about localized source




Influences  are difficult to define but a contribution of more than 5  percent




to n measured concentration from any one source, as estimated from point source




diffusion calculations, would be undesirable for a station expected to provide




valid results for the surrounding area.




    4.  Data Processing and Validation




          The usefulness of air quality data is related to its reliability and




availability.  The former cannot be assured only by proper method and sample




location solection.  Continuous attention to calibration, operation and maintenance




Is particularly important in continuous analyzer systems.




          Calibration (the relationship of measured value to contaminant)




should be carried out as specified in the description of the method being




used.  Neglect here can reduce to useless the value of the data collected.




Operational measures such as routine zeroing and spanning, adjusting flow controls,
                                     5-116

-------
Servicing and cleanin.', components, noting cnange in parts, and describing




unusual events also contribute to producing  ^formation approximating  . lie




accur.iey theoretically attainable by the method.




          Following tuo field procedures taken to produce valid  inforn..1 ..ion,




a formal editing proo.'.ss is desirable for data collected with record!'




devac.es.  A trained tvlitor can detect many symptoms of.' malfunction tiucii  as




electronic noise and component failure, which may result in drift or  lack of




sensitivity.  Further quality control measures can b«- taken by establi.suing




criteria on the acceptance or rejection of data exhibiting unusual patterns—




whatever the cause—or for evidence of proper operational procedures  su> h as




entry of zer», span, flow rate and other pertinent information.




          The validation procedure should continue following the reduction of




dat.i  to the form usud for storage.  Steps would include random checks ol" reduced




datn  vs. original charts and examination for rationality.  Wherever computer




processing i;; utilised some of these checks  can be built into the programming.




Example mean values over a given time period could be tested to  insure  that they




be less than shorter interval means or instantaneous values over the  sane




olapsod time.  Deviation from typical patterns could be checked  by flagging




unusual peak-to-mean ratios or times of peaks.




          Insofar as the analysis of air quality uata is concerned, a prime




objective is the de-termination of how the various indices of that data  i.^Jate




to criteria and standards.  Most commonly these standards are exps't-Tscd  in terms




of frequency distributions of concentration  ms-ans taken over various  avtraging




periods.  Study of existing air quality data indicates that there are c'aracteristic
                                     5-117

-------
lognormal probability distributions functions for each contaminant at a given



locution.  This knowledge enables the estimation of a wider range of values than


                                     132
actually measured.  Larsen and Zimmer    demonstrated that 26 random



24-hour batch model nitrogen oxides samples served as a reasonably good predictor



of the frequency distribution of 70,000 5-minute values taken over a period



of a year with a continuous analyzer.  Given the proper input, computer techniques



can be used to calculate a wide variety of distribution statistics in the form



required for evaluation of data against criteria and standards.



          Still another use of air quality data is the development and evaluation



of abatement implementation plans.  One approach involves the use of atmos-



pheric simulation models, which in turn involve emission and atmospheric



diffusion and reaction submodels.  Reference was made to several of these in



tho previous paragraph.  Because these models are still in beginning stages



i i  development, somewhat more use has been made of multivariate analysis


                   I -j-j
iorhuiques.  Larsen"   has used this approach in calculating reduced emission



toqulremenis to meet certain air quality goals for a hypothetical case.


                                                                   134
          A factor analysis approach was used by Bifford and Meeker    in



producing a number of independent factors characteristic of certain types of



pollution sources from a large amount of data on particulate subclasses from



the National Air Sampling Network.  A regression of these factors on the cities



used in the study gave information on the importance of some of these factors



in characterizing the types of pollution, and thus likely source, in each location.
                                     5-118

-------
                                REFERENCES








!•   Stern, A. D., Ed., "Air Pollution," Academic Press, New York, 1968,




     Vol. II, 2nd ed., Chapters 16, 17, 27.




2-   Lodge, J. P., Jr., Pate, J. B., Ammons, B. E., Swanson, G. A., "The




     Use of Hypodermic Needles as Critical Orifices in Sampling,"




     J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc.. 16, 197-200, 1966.



3.   Thomas, M. D., Amtower, R. E., "Gas Dilution Apparatus for Preparing




     Reproducible Dynamic Gas Mixtures in any Desired Concentration and




     Complexity," J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc.. 16, 618-623, 1966.




4.   O'Keefe, A. E., Ortman, G. C., "Primary Standards for Trace Gas




     Analysis," Anal. Chem., 38, 760-763, 1966.




5.   Schuette, F., "Plastic Bags for Collection of Gas Samples,"




     Atm. Environ., i, 515-519, 1967.




6.   Renzetti, N. A., Romanovsky, J. C., "Comparative Study of Oxidants




     in the Los Angeles Atmosphere," Arch. Ind. Health. 1.4, 458-467, 1956.




7.   Renzetti, N. A., Ed.,  "An Aerometric Survey of the Los Angeles Basin,




     August-November 1954," Air Pollution Foundation, Los Angeles, 1955.




8.   Pierce, L. B., Nichikawa, K., Fansah, N. 0., "Validation of Calibration




     Techniques," 8th Conference on Methods in Air Pollution and Industrial




     Hygiene Studies, Oakland, California, February 6-8, 1967.




9.   Interbranch Chemical Advisory Committee, "Selected Methods for the




     Measurement of Air Pollutants," PHS Publication No. 999-AP-ll,




     Cincinnati, 1965.





                                    5-119

-------
10.    Mast,  G.  M.,  Saunders,  H.  E.,  "Research and Development  of  Instrumentation




      of Ozone  Testing,"  ISA  Transactions, JL.,  No.  4,  October 1962.




11.    Potter, L., Duckworth,  S., "Field  Experience with the Mast  Ozone




      Recorder." J.  Air Poll.  Cont.  Assoc..  L5,  207-209,  1965.




12.    Siu, W.,  Ahlstrom,  M. R.,  Feldstern, M., "Comparison  of  Coulometric




      and Colorimetric  Oxidant Analyzer  Data," 10th Conference on Methods in




      Air Pollution and Industrial Hygiene Studies, February 19,  1969,



      San Francisco.




13.    Byers, D. H.,  Saltzman,  B. E., "Determination of  Ozone in Air by




      Neutral and Alkaline Iodide Procedures," Amer.  Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.. 19.




      251-257,  1958.




14.    Sanders,  G. R.,  State of California Department  of Public Health,




      Personal  Communication,  June 1965.




15.    Cherniack, I.,  Bryan, R. J., "A Comparison Study  of Various Types of



      Ozone  and Oxidant Detectors Which  are  Used for  Atmospheric  Air




      Sampling," J.  Air Poll.  Cont.  Assoc..  15.  351-354,  1965.




16.    Cholak, J., Shafer, L.  J., Younker, W. J., Yeager,  D., "Air Pollution




      in a Number of American Cities," Arch. Ind.  Health.  11.  280-289, 1955.




17.    Deutsch,  S.,  "Acid  Potassium Iodide Method for  Determining  Atmospheric



      Oxidants," J.  Air Poll.  Cont.  Assoc..  18.  78-83,  1968.




18.    Haagen-Smit,  A.  J., Brunelle,  M. F., "The  Application of Phenolphthalin




      Reagent  to Atmospheric  Oxidant Analysis,"  Int.  J. Air Poll..  JL,




      51-59, 1958.
                                     5-120

-------
 *'   ReRener, V. H. , "On  a  Sensitive Method ''or the Recording  of  Atnu spheric



      o^ne," J. «;>iOHiys.  Res..  65.,  3975, 1960.



      R«'gt'iK;r, V. H.,  "ieasurement of Atmospheric Ozone wit.h  tho



      Ctu-mi lumine&-.eu(.:e Method," J.  Geopnys. Kes. , 69. 3795,  1964.



21 •   Kuhtir, H., s;,itM,  J.  K., Tabor, K. C., "Ozone Determination:  .'



      Comparison Wutvoi:n Chemi Luminescence and Kl Techniques,"  9th Coi>; erence



      01. Methods in A.r 1'ollution and Industrial Hygiene Studies,  nHs..ana,



      C.ili£< rnia, Kebru.iry 7-9,  1968.



^-   Haagrin -Smit, .\.  I.,  i;ox, M.  M. , "Ozone Formation in  i'hotocheiruca ,



      Oxidation ot Organic Substances," Ind. Eng. Ghem.. 48,  1484-1487.  1956.


') '\
 *•   Renzetui, N. A., "Ozone in the  Los AngeJes Atmosphere," Ozone



      Chemistry and  Technology,  ACS Advances in Chemistry  Series,  .21 ,



      465-, 1959-


2't.   Bravo,  ii. , Lotlgt-, J.,  "Specific Spectrophotometric Determination  )f



      Ui'Un^  in  Lht /^Lirjoaphere,"  Anal . Chcm. , 36, 671-673,  1964,



25.   i:ol!'!ii,  I.  'i. .  Purcell, T.  C.,  Altshuller, A. P., "Analysis  of th



      <>\] i. in"  in I'hoLo-oxidatiou Reactions," Environ. j>_ct_.  and  Tech. ,
/u.   Mash, T.,  "Color metric Determinatiun ul 0 -i.ne  by I)i. t etyl-lunvv



      LutiUine," Atoms.  Environ. ,  _!, 679-6B7,  1967.



27.   Cohen,  1.  K,,  Bufalini, J. J., "Further  Observations on v)4a Ftrr us



      Ammonium Thiocy;.uate Reagent for Ozone," Enviroa . be .  and Tec 'a.  1 ,



      1014,  1967.
                                      5-121

-------
28.   Hauser, T.  R.,  Bradley,  D.  W.,  "Specific Spectrophotometric Determination




      of Ozone in the Atmosphere  Using l,2-Du-(4-Pyridyl)ethylene,"




      Anal.  Chem. .38, 1529-1532,  1966.




29.   Hauser, T.  R.,  Bradley,  D.  W.,  "Effects of Interfering Substances and




      Prolonged Sampling on the l,2-Di-(4-Pyridyl)Ethylene Method for




      Determination of Ozone in Air," Anal.  Chem.. 39, 1184-1186, 1967.




30.   Manita, M.  D.,  Rumyantseva, M.  V.,  Egite, M. E., "Spectrophotometric




      Determination of Ozone with Dihydroacridine in the Atmosphere of




      Populated Areas," Hygiene Sanit.. 3.2,  219-225, 1967.




31.   German, A., Panouse-Perrin, J., Quero, A. M., "Dosage Colorimetrique




      de I1 Ozone," Ann. Pharm. Fr. .  (Paris). 25., 115-120, 1967.




32.   Bufalini, J. J., "Gas Phase Titration of Atmospheric Ozone,"




      Environ. Sci.  and Tech.. ,2, 703-704, 1968.




33.   Dudley, J.  E.,  Lozano, E. R.,  Bufalini, J., Yunghans, R.  G.,




      "Continuous Monitoring for  Atmospheric Total Oxidant and Simultaneous




      Determination of Ozone by Gas  Phase Titration," Paper No.  69-87,




      presented at Air Poll. Cont. Assoc. Meeting, New York, June 24, 1969.



J'».   Harsch, P., Dcuringer, R.,  "Galvanic Monitoring of Ozone in Air,"




      Anal.  Chem.. 15, 897-899, 1963.



3'j.   Leighton, P. A., "Photochemistry of Air Pollution," Academic Press,




      New York, Pp.  184-186, 1961.




M.   Bonamassa,  F.,  (California  Air  Resources Laboratory), personal




      communication.
                                    5-122

-------
J7-    Saltsra.in, B.  I., Wartburg, A. F., Jr., "Precision Flow Dilution  i




      for St.nulard Low Concentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide," Anal. Chem. . _37_,




      1261-1.'o4, 1%5.




W-    Hersch,  P.,  and Deuringer, K., "Trace Addition of Nitric Oxide and




      Nitrogtn Dioxide to Air by Electrolysis," Paper 63-36, 56th Annua]




      Meeting, Air I'oll. Cont. Assoc., Detroit, 1963.




39.    Saltznun, B.  F.., "Colorimetric Microdetermination of Nitrogen




      Dioxide  in the Atmosphere," Anal. Chem.. 26, 1949-1955, 1954.




40.    Riplcy,  1). L., Clingenpul, J. M., Hurn, R. W., "Continuous




      Determination of Nitrogen Oxides in Air and Exhaust Gases,"




      Int. J_.  Air and Water Poll. , 8., 455-463, 1964.




•'•>!•    Wilson,  1).,  Kopxzynski, S. L. , "Laboratory Experiences in Analyst •; of




      Nitric Oxide with 'Dichromate' Paper," J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc..  18,




      160-161, 1968.




42.    Calhoun, J.  D., Brooks, C. R., "A Solid Oxidant for Oxides of




      Nitrogen AnaJyzur," 7th Conference on Methods in Air Pollution and




      Industrial Hygiene Studies, Los Angeles, January 25, 1965.




43.    Saltzman, B.  K., Chairman, Subcommittee 3, "Tentative Method of




      Analysis for Nitrogen Dioxide Content of the Atmosphere  (Griess-




      S.iltzman Reaction) 42602-01-68T," in Health Lab. Sci.. 6, 106-113, 1969.



44.    Morrison, M. E., Corcoran, W. H., "Optimum Conditions and Variability




      in Use of Pulsed Voltage  in Gas-Chromatographic Determination oJ




      l'art.s-P«-r-Million Quantities of Nitrogen Dioxide," Anal. Chem., _3j!»




      :">5-258, 1967.
                                     5-123

-------
45.   Barringer, A. R., Newburg, B. C., "Remote Sensing Correlation




      Spectrometry for Pollution Measurement," 9th Conference on Methods




      in Air Pollution and Industrial Hygiene Studies, Pasadena, California




      February 7-9, 1968.




46.   Kay, R. B., "Absorption Spectre Apparatus Using Optical Correlation




      for the Detection of Trace Amounts of S0»," J. Appl. Opticsr  .6,




      776-778, 1967.




47.   "Remote Monitoring Instrumentation for Source Emissions and Urban




      Atmospheres," Clean Air Quarterly (State of California), 11.  pp 9-12,




      December 1967.




48.   Androatch, A. J., Feinland, R., "Continuous Trace Hydrocarbon Analysis




      by Flame lonization," Anal. Chem.. 32. 1021-1024, 1960.




49.   Bruderreck, H., Schneider, W., Halasz, I., "Quantitative Gas




      Chromotographic Analysis of Hydrocarbons with Capillary Columns




      and Flame lonization Detector," Anal. Chem.. 36. 461-473, 1964.




50.   Altshuller, A. P., "An Evaluation of Techniques for the Determination




      of the Photochemical Reactivity of Organic Emissions,"




      J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc.. 16., 257-260, 1966.




51.   Ortman, G. C., "Monitoring Methaae in Atmosphere with a Flame



      lonization Detector," Anal. Chem.. 38_, 644-646, 1966.
                                     5-124

-------
52.    Altshuller,  A.  P.,  Ortraan,  G.  C.,  Saltzman,  B.  E.,  Neligan,  R.  K.,




      "Continuous  Monitoring of Methane  and Other  Hydrocarbons in  Urban




      Atmospheres,"  J.  Air Poll.  Cont. Assoc..  16, 87-91, 1966.




53.    Altshuller,  A.  P.,  "Atmospheric Analysis  by  Gas Chromatography," in




      "Advances in Chromatography,"  Vol.  5, Giddings, J.  C.,  Keller,  R. A.,




      Eds.,  Marcel Dikker, New York, 1968.




54.    Pierct,  L.  B.,  Mueller, P.  K., "Analysis  of  Atmospheric Hydrocarbons




      by Gas Chromatography," 10th Conference on Methods in Air Pollution




      and Industrial Hygiene Studies, San Francisco,  February 19-21,  1969.




55_    Mader, P. P.,  Heddon, M. W., Lofberg, R.  T., Koehler, R. H.,




      "Determination of Small Amounts of Hydrocarbons in the Atmosphere,"




      Anal.  Chem.. 2A,  1899-1902, 1952.




55    Shepard, M., Rock,  S. M., Howard,  R., Stortnes,  J., "Isolation




      Identification and Estimation  of Gaseous  Pollutants in Air,"




      Anal.  Chem.. 23,  1431-1440, 1951.




      Weavers  E.  R., Hughes, E. E.,  Gunther, S. M., Schuhmann, S.,




      Redfeam, N.  T., Gordon, R., Jr., "Interpretation of Mass Spectre




      From Condensates  from Urban Atmospheres," J. Res.  Natt. Bur. Std.t  59,




      383-404, 1951.



57    MacPhec, R.  D., "Use of Molybdates for Estimating Amount of Olefinic-



      Type Hydrocarbons in Air," Anal. Chem.. 26.  221-225, 1954.



<^g    Altshuller,  A. P., Sleva, S. F., "Spectrophotometric Determination




      of Olefins," Anal.  Chem.. 33.,  1413-1420, 1961.
                                     5-125

-------
59.  Nicksic, S.  W., Roatenbach, R.  W., "Instrumentation for Olefin




     Analysis at Ambient Concentrations," J.  Air Poll.  Cont. Assoc. 11.




     417-420, 1961




60.  Lyles, G. R., Dowllng, F. B.,  BIanchard, V. J., "Quantitative




     Determination of Formaldehyde  in the Parts per Hundred Million




     Concentration Level," J. Air Poll, Cont. Assoc., 15, 106-108, 1965.




61.  Altahuller, A,  P., Cohen, I. R., Myer, M. E., Wartburg, A.  F., Jr.,




     "Analysis of Ahphatic Aldehydes in Source Effluents and the Atmosphere,"




     Anal. Chim. Acta. 25_, 101-117,  1961.




62.  Wilson, K. W.,  "Fixation of Atmospheric Carbonyl Compounds  by




     Sodium Bisulfite," Anal. Chem.. 30, 1127-1129, 1960.




63.  Altshuller, A.  P., Miller, D.  L., Sleva, S. F., "Determination of




     Formaldehyde in Gas Mixtures by the Chromotropic Acid Method,"




     Anal. Chem., 33, 621-625, 1961.




64.  Sawicki, E., Hauser, T. R., Stanley, T.  W. , Elbe'rt, W. ,




     "The 3-Methyl-2-benzothiazole  Hydrazone Test," Anal. Chem.. 33,




     93-96, 1961.



65.  Altshuller, A.  P., Leng, L. J., "Application of the 3-Methyl-2-



     benzothiazole Hydrazone Method for Atmospheric Analysis of  Aliphatic




     Aldehydes," Anal. Chem.. 3_5, 1541-1542, 1963.   j



66.  Hauser, T. R., Cummins, R. L., "Increasing Sensitivity of




     3-Methyl-2-benzothiazole Hydrazone Test for Analysis of Aliphatic




     Aldehydes in Ari." Anal. Chem..  36., 679-681, 1964.
                                      5-126

-------
67. Sawicki, E., Hauser, T. R., Fox, F. T.,  "Spectrophotometric




    Determination of Aliphatic Aldehyde 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazones with



    3-2-benzithiazolr Hydrazone." Anal. Chim. Ada.  2&,  229-234,  1962.




68. Jonr




    the Determination of Acrolein  in Combustion Gases and in the Atmos;> ;ere,"



    Anal. Cham.. 33, 726-733,  1961.




70. Stephens, E. R., Darley, E. F., Taylor,  0.  C., Scott, W.  E.,




    "Photochemical Products in Air Pollution,"  Int.  J.  Air and  Water  J^'l.,




    4., 79-100, 1961.




71. Nicksic, S. W., Harkins, J., Mueller,  P.  K.,  "Some Analysts for IV.:




    and Studies of Its  Structure." Atmos.  Environ..  _!,  11-18,  1967.




72. Stephens, E. R., "Absorptivities for  Infrared  Determination ai




    IV-roxyacyl Nitrates," Anal. Chem.. 36, 928-9^9,  1964.




/J. Darley, I. F., Kittner, K. A., Stephens,  E.  K.,  "Analysis ot




    Peroxyacyl Nitrates by Gas Chromatography with Electron Capcuie




    Detection," Anal. Chem.. 35. 589-591,  1963.



74. Heuss, J. M., Glasson, W. A.,  "Hydrocarbon  Reactivity and Eye IrriciLiun,"



    Environ. Sci. and Tech.. 2., 1109-1116, 1968.




75. Altshuller, A. P.,  Kopczynski, S. L.,  Lonneman,  W.  A., Beck«r




    Slater, R., "Chemical Aspects  of the  Photp-oxidation of Prcpylene-



    Nitrogeri  Jxide System," Environ, Sci.  and Tech.. 1_,  899-914,  1967.
                                   5-127

-------
76.    Taylor, B. C., Stephens, E. R., Cardiff, E. A., "Automatic




      Chromatographic Measurement of PAN," Paper 68-70, 61st Annual Meeting




      Air Poll. Cont. Assoc., Saint Paul, Minnesota, June 23-27, 1968.




77.    Lundgren, D. A., Cooper, D. W., "The Effect of Humidity on




      Light-Scattering Methods of Measuring Particulate Concentrations,"




      J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc.. 19, 243-247, 1969.




78.    Anderson, A. A., "A New Sampler for the Collection, Sizing, and




      Enumeration of Viable Airborne Particles," J. Bact.. 76. 471-484, 1958.




79.    Friedrichs, K. H., "Experience with Impactors in Dust Measurements,"




      Staub-Reinhalt. Luft. 2B,  19-21, 1968.




80.    Lundgren, D. A., "Determination of Aerosol Composition as a Function




      of Particle Size and Time," 10th Conference on Methods in Air




      Pollution and Industrial Hygiene Studies, San Francisco,




      February 26-28, 1969.




81.    Goetz, A., Stevenson, A. J. R., Preining, 0., "The Design and the




      Performance of the Aerosol Spectrometer," J. Air Poll. Cont. Assoc..




      10. 378-383, 414, 416,  1960.



82.    Lieberman, A., Schimpa, P., "Air Pollution-Monitoring Instrumentation.




      A Survey," NASA SP-5072, IIT Research Institute, 1969.




83.    Whitby, K. T., Vomela,  A., "Response of Single Particle Optical




      Counters to Nonideal Particles," Environ. Sci. and Tech., _!,




      801-814, 1967.
                                     5-128

-------
84.    Charl.«4on, R. J., Howath, H., Pueschel, R. F. , "The Direct




      Measurement of Atmospheric Light-Scattering Coefficients for Stu




      of Visibility and Pollution," Atmos. Environ.. 1., 469-478, 1967-




85.    Charls'm, R. J., Ahlquist, N. C., Howath, H., "On the Generality of




      Correlation ot Atmospheric Aerosol Mass Concentration and Light




      Scatter1," Atmos. Environ.. .2, 455-404, 1968.




86.    Noll, K. E., Mueller, P. K., Imada, M., "Visibility and Aerosol




      Concent,ration in Urban Air," Atmos. Environ.. J2, 465-475, 1968.




87.    Barriiti, E. W. , Ben-IJov, 0., "App ication of the Lidar to Air




      Pollutiom Measurements," J. Appl. Moteorol.. .6, 500, 1967.




88.    (Joetz, \., Tsuneisht, N., "Bacteriologic Analogue for Eye Irriataon




      by Aerosols," Arch. Ind. Health. 20. 167-180, 1959.




89.    Serat, W. K., Budinger, F. E., Jr., Mueller, P. K., "Evaluation cf




      Biologu-al Eftects of Air Pollutants by Use  of Luminescent Bacceria,"




      J. Bact.. 90, 832-833, 1965.




90.    Serat, W. F., Bridinger, F. E., Jr., Mueller, P. K., "Toxicity




      Evaluation of Air Pollutants by Use of Luminescent  Bacteria,"




      Atmos. Environ., .1, 31-32, 1967.




91.    Serat, V. F., Kyons, J., Mueller, P. K., "Measuring the Effect of /iir




      Pollution on Bacterial Luminescence:   A Simplified  Procedure,"




      Atmos.  ''.nviron. . 3[, 303-309, 1969.




92.   Wayne. L. G., "Eye Irritation as a  Biological Indicator of Photochemical




      Reactions in the Atmosphere," Aimos. Environ. .  !_, 97-104, 1967.
                                       5-129

-------
93.  Bryan, R. J. and Romanovsky, J. C., "Instrumentation for Air Pollution,"




     Instruments and Automation, 29, 2432-2438 (1956).




94.  Perry, L., "Methods Used in the Statewide Cooperative Air-Monitoring"




     Project," Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Methods in Air




     Pollution Studies, California Department of Public Health, Los Angeles




     (January 25-26, 1965).




95.  CAMP in Cincinnati 1962-1963; Public Health Service Publication




     No. 999-AP-21, Cincinnati, 1965.




96.  Technical Report, New York-New Jersey Air Pollution Abatement




     Activity, Sulfur Compounds and Carbon Monoxide, USPHS, National Center




     for Air Pollution Control, Cincinnati (January, 1967).




'^7.  Fair, D. H., Morgan, G. B., Zimmer, C. A., "Storage and Retrieval




     of Air Quality Data (SAROAD).  System Description and Data Coding




     Manual," PHS, Publication  No. APTD-68-8, Cincinnati, Ohio, National




     Center for Air Pollution Control  (June, 1968).




98.  Regener, V. H., "Measurement of Ozone with the Chemiluminescent



     Method," J. Geophys. Res.. 3795-3800 (1964).




99.  Richter, H.G., Smith, J. R., and Ripoerton, L.A., "Chemiluminescent




     Ozone Measurement Program-Urban Atmosphere," Research Triangle




     Inst. Final Report.  Contract PH-27-68-26 (December, 1967).
                                    5-130

-------
100.   Richter,  H.G.,  et al,  "Chemiluminescent Ozone Measurement Program—Ozone




      Total Oxldant  Relationship in Ambient Air," Research Triangle Ins;..




      Final Report,  Contract PH22-68-30 (May, 1969).




101.   "Recommended Ambient Air Quality Standards," State of California Air




      Resources Board (May 21, 1969).




102.   Mueller,  P.K.,  Fansch, N.O., Tokiwa, Y., Kothing, E.L.,  "Series vs.




      Parallel  NOx Analysis," 9th Conf. on Methods in Air Pollution Stmties,




      Pasadena, California,  February 7-9, 1968, California Department i J




      Public Health  (February, 1968).




103.   Cavanagh, L.A., Schadt, C.F., and Robinson, E., "Atmospheric




      Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide  Measurements at Point Barrow, Alaska",




      Env.  Sri, and  Tech.  3_ 251-257 (1969).




104.   Ehhalt, D.H.,  "Methane in the Atmosphere", J.Alr Poll.  Con t. As so c.




      12 518-519 (1967).




105.   Swlnnerton, J.W., Tinnenbom, V.J., and Cheek, C.H., "Distribution of




      Methane and Carbon Monoxide Between the Atmosphere and Natural




      Waters",  Env.  Sci.  and Tech. 3_ 836-838 (1969)




106.   Altshuller, A.P., Ortraan, G.C.,  and Saltzman, B.E., "Continuous




      Monitoring of  Methane  and Other  Hydrocarbons in Urban Atmospheres"



      J.  Air Poll. Cont.  Assoc. 16 87-91 (1966).




107.   Altshuller, A.  P.,  and Bellar, T.A., "Gas Chromatographic Analysis




      of  Hydrocarbons in the Los Angeles Atmosphere", J.Air.Poll. Cont.Assoc.




      13  81-87  (1963).
                                       5-131

-------
108.   Tonneman, W.  A., Bellar, T.A.,  and Altshuller,  A.P.,  "Aromatic Hydrocarbons




      in the Atmosphere of the Los Angeles Basin," Env.  Sc i.  and Tech.  £ 1017-1020




      (1968).



109.   Gordon,  R. J. Mayrsohn, M.,  and Ingels, R.M., "C.-C,  Hydrocarbons in




      the Los  Angeles Atmosphere", Env.  Sci.  and Tech. j2 1117-1120 (1968).




110.   Stephens, E.R., and Burleson, F.R., "Distribution of  Light Hydrocarbons




      in Ambient Air", Paper No.  69-122  presented at 62nd Annual Meeting of




      the Air Poll. Cont. Assoc.,  New York, 1969.




111.   Stephens, E.R., and Burleson, F.R. "Analysis of the Atmosphere for Light




      Hydrocarbons", J.Air Poll.  Cont.Assoc.  17 147-153 (1967)




112.   Neligan, R.E., "Hydrocarbons in the Los Angeles Atmosphere",




      Arch.Environ. Health, _5 581-591 (1962).




113.   Mayrsohn, H.  and Brooks, C., "The  Analysis of PAN by  Electron Capture Gas




      Chromatography," presented at Western Regional Meeting of the American




      Chemical Society, November 18, 1965.




114.   Taylor,  O.C., "Importance of Peroxyactylinitrate (PAN)  as a Phytotoxic




      Air Pollutant," J. of the Air Poll. Contr. Assoc. 19, 347-351 (May, 1969)



115.   Technical Progress Report, Vol. 2, "Air Quality of Los Angeles County,




      pp. 26,29,43,54 County of Los Angeltj Air Pollution Control




      District  (February, 1961).




116.   Method 5-46 "Aldehydes, Total," Laboratory Methods of the Los Angeles




      County Air Pollution Control District (1.968).
                                      5-132

-------
117.   Method 8-53, "Formaldehyde",  Ibid




118.   Renzeti-i, N.A. ,  and Bryan,  J.F.,  "Atmospheric Sampling for Aldehvdes  and




      Eye Irritation," J.of the Air Poll.  Contr.  Assoc.^ 11, 421-424,




      427 (September,  1961).




119.   Brier, G.W., "Some Statistical Aspects of Long-Term Fluctuations  in




      Solar and Atmospheric Phenomena," Annals of the New York Acad.




      of Science,  95:  173-187, (1961).




120.   Holzworth, G.C.  and Maga, J.A.,  "A Method for Analyzing the Trem: In




      Visibility," Journal of the APCA, 10, 6, 430-435, (December, I960?.




121.   Ingels. R.M., Holmes, R.G., Hamming, W.J.,  Chass, R.L., and




      Griswold, S.S.,  "Trends in  Atmospheric Concentrations of Oxides  of




      Nitrogen, 1957-1961, Los Angeles  County Air Pollution Control District




      Report, (August, 1962).




122.   Technical Bulletin A-69-1,  New Jersey Department of Health, Division  of




      Clean Air and Water (July,  1969).




123.   "Air Quality Criteria for Photochemical Oxid.-jits," U.S. DHEW, PHS, EHS,



      NAPCA, (March,  1970).




124.   "Statistical Analysis in Chemistry and the  Chemical Industry,"




      C.A. Bennett and N.L. Franklin, John Wiley  and Sons, Inc., New York,  (1954),




125.   G. W. Brier, in  Symposium on Environmental  Measurements—Valid Data  and




      Logical Interpretation, 265—72,  PHS Publ.  No. 999-AP-15, (July,  1964).




126.   Bryan, R. J.,"Air Pollution", Vol. il, 2nd Ed., A.C. S.era, Ea.,




      Academic Press,  Inc., New York, New York, 1968, Chapter 26.
                                     5-133

-------
127.   Stalker, W.  W.,  Dickerson,  R.  C.  and Kramer,  G.  D.,  J.  Air Poll.




      Contr.  Assoc.  12,  361 (1962).




128.   Holland, W.  D.,  Fisher,  E.  L., Brunelle,  M.  F.,  and  Bryan, J.  R.,




      "Relationship  Between Fixed Station and Mobile Air Sampling in Los  Angeles




      County", paper,  68-41, 61st Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control




      Association, St. Paul, Minnesota (June, 1968).




129.   Martin, D. 0.,  "A General Atmospheric Diffusion  Model for Estimating




      the Effects on Air Quality of  One or More Sources",  paper 68-148,




      61st Annual Meeting in Pollution Control  Association, St. Paul, Minn.




      (June 1968).




130.   N. E. Bowne, "A Mathematical Diffusion Model for Connecticut", paper




      69-17], 62nd Annual Meeting, Air Pollution Control Association,




      New York, New York (June, 1969).




HI.   "Report for Consultation on the Metropolitan Chicago Interstate Air




      Quality Control Region (Indiana-Illinois), PHS,  Nat. Air Poll. Control




      Admin.   (Sept.  1968).




H2.   Zimmer, C. E., Larsen, R. L.,  "Calculating Air Quality and Its




      Control", J. Air Poll. Contr.  Assoc..   15 565-72 (January 1965).




133.   Larsen, R. I., "Determining Reduced Emission Goals  Needed to Achieve



      Air Quality Goals—A Hypothetical Case", J. of the  Air Poll. Contr.




      Assoc., r7, 823-9, (December,  1967).




134.   Bifford, Jr., I.H., Meeker, G.O., "A Factor Analysis Model of Large




      Scale Pollution," Atm. Environment. 1, 147-57 (1967).
                                      5-134

-------
'-                                               CHAPTI.R 6




                                       MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF AIR




*                                     QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA





                                                                                    Page





             A.   INTRODUCTION                                                      6-5




             B.   DATA ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT                                   6-5




                  1.  Air Quality Data                                              6-5




                  2.  Meteorological Data                                           6-7




                  3.  Data Management                                               6-8




             C.   THE STATISTICAL PROGRAM SYSTEM                                    6-10




                  1.  Rank Order Analysis                                           6-12




                  2.  Freauency Distribution and Simple Statistics                  6-12




                  3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis                           6-15




                  4.  Auto-correlation and Cross-correlation                        6-17




             D.   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                            6-22




                  1.  The SCAN Stations as a Set                                    6-23



                  2.  The CAMP Cities as a Set                                      6-36




                  3.  Comparison of the SCAN Stations and CAMP Cities               6-40




                  4.  Additional Analysis Possible                                  6-41
                                                    6-1

-------
                                   CHAPTER 6




                                LIST OF FIGURES






Figure                                                                 Page




 6-1          SDC Air Quality Data Management and Analysis             6-9




              System (AQ/DMAS).



 6-2          Sample of Total Merged Data Base, Denver, 1967.          6-11




 6-3          Rank Order Analysis, Anaheim, 1967.                      6-13




 6-4          Frequency Distribution for Total Oxidant.                6-14




 6-5          Descriptive Statistics.                                  6-16



 6-6          Regression Analysis of Episode Days Selected on          6-18




              Basis of Rank Order Analysis.




 6-7          Regression Analysis of Episode Days Selected on          6-19




              Basis of Rank Order Analysis.




 6-8          Auto-correlations.                                       6-21



 6-9          Cumulative Frequency  Distributions of Hourly             6-26




              Average  Oxidant,  1967.



 6-10        Cumulative Frequency  Distributions of Hourly             6-27




              Average  Carbon Monoxide, 1967,  5 SCAN Stations.




  6-11        Cumulative Frequency Distributions of Hourly              6-28




              Average  Total Hydrocarbons, 1967, 4 SCAN




               Stations.
                                       6-2

-------
Figure                                                                Page




 6-12       Cumulative Frequency Distributions of Hourly                29




            Average Nitric Oxide, 1967,  5 SCAN Stations.




 6-13       Cumulative Frequency Distributions of Hourly                30




            Average Nitrogen Dioxide, 1967,  5 SCAN




            Stations.
                                   6-3

-------
                                CHAPTER 6




                             LIST OF TABLES




Table                                                                 Page




 6-1        Photochemical and Meteorological Data Elements.           6-6




 6-2        Sample Statistics, All Stations, 1967.                    6-24




 6-3        Comparison of Five SCAN Stations by Ranking               6-31




            Relative to Five Contaminants (99th Percentile).




 6-4        Results of Correlation and Regression Analyses,           6-34




            Six SCAN Stations, 1967.




 6-5        Results Auto- and Cross-correlation Analyses,             6-35




            Six SCAN Stations, 1967.




 6-6        Results of Correlation and Regression Analysis,           6-38




            Six CAMP Stations, 1967.




 6-7        Results of Auto- and Cross-correlations, Six              6-39




            CAMP Stations, 1967.
                                    6-4

-------
A.  TNTHTT, •.ION




          l.jo purpose of tlut. statistica. analysis vaa to explore the Inter-




relationships among commonly measured photochemical contaminants and




meteorological variables in > urban regions.  The yea.. 1967 was selected for




study as this was the year when the most complete data for contaminant




concentration and meteorological variables were available for 12 stations in




the CAMP and SCAN networks.  Total oxidant concentration, an Indicator of




photochemical pollution, was selected as the key dependent variable.  Both




instantaneous daily maximum and hourly average values formed two statistical




sample populations over which several types of analyses ranged.




          A first iteration of the multivariate analysis was completed in four




sequentially interdependent phases:  (1) rank ordering of the? days of t'.ie year




according t'o the values of their peak instantaneous total oxidant concentra-




tions; (2) fcaqueney distribution and descriptive statistics on all hourly




averse photochemical contaminant concentrations and meteorological variable




hourly • \Tnra 'e values;  (3) correlation and regression analysis; and (4) auto




and cross-correlation analysis.




B.  DATA ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT




    1.  Air Quality Data



          Th<: statistical studies were concentrated on CAMP (Cooperative Air




Monitoring Program) data for six cities and six Los Angeles SCAN (State of




California Air Monitoring Network) stations for the year 1967, as shown in




Table 1.  Tl.rse data were acquired from the National Air Pollution Control
                                      6-5

-------
 00 4->
 d  a
•rt  00
 X  1-1
•H  V
X  93
2
                                                       H
                                                       9)
                                                O jd
                                               H W
                                                    CO
                                                      
-------
Administration and the California Air Resources Board in the form of computer




taped.  The  physical and logical structure of the SCAN tapes were well




described in covering documentation and were compatible to the IBM 360 series.




          The CAMP information arrived on Honeywell 400 3/4 inch tapes which




necessitated a complex, multistage conversion process to achieve IBM 360




compatibility.




          A significant number of logical and physical tape anomalies such as




variations in card image overpunching codes and an interleaving of 1968 data,




not accounted for in the received covering documentation, were uncovered.  A




unified data storage structure and processing strategy was thus necessitated




to facilitate preparation and management of CAMP and SCAN data sources.  The




hourly average concentration for six photochemical-related pollutants,




CO, NO, NO., hydrocarbons,methane-free hydrocarbons (where available) and total




oxidant was selected as the basic statistical unit.  These data were merged




with corresponding data on six meteorological variables (wind speed, wind




direction, pressure, temperature, relative humidity and total sky cover).




          The SCAN station variable sets were augmented by the inclusion of




estimates of mixing height.  The mechanics of this estimation are described




below.




    2.  Meteorological Data



          For each CAMP city and for a number of weather bureau sites in the




Los Angeles basin, a directly compatible WBAN 144 deck was .icquii-.I frozi




ESSA (Environmental Sciences Services Administration).  Augmenting the
                                      6-7

-------
Los Angeles meteorological data, the California Air Resources Board supplied a



special "dense" network data tape for six Los Angeles weather-measuring stations.



These recorded the diurnal fluctuations of wind speed, direction and temperature.



Computer subroutines were applied to merge these data with the pollutant data



bases, thus, in effect assigning the values to the pollutant stations.  For the



estimation of mixing heights a series of temperature versus height radiosonde



curves was constructed from Los Angeles Airport (LAX) data.  Interpolated



temperature is used in a computer subroutine in connection with an appropriate



radiosonde curve and lapse rate to estimate the mixing height at the pollutant



station.  These routines are similar to those Incorporated in the photochemical



pollution  model, described in Chapter 7.




    3.  Data Management



          To manage the data, implement the above data transformations and



place the data in a form suitable for statistical analysis, a system of original



data management routines was devised.  This system of programs, referred to as



an Air Quality Data Management and Analysis System (AQ/DMAS), is illustrated in



generalized form in Figure 6-1.  AQ/DMAS, which operates on IBM 360-50-67



systems, accomplishes the following:



          1.  Reads Honeywell 3/4 inch tape, reproduces to 1/2 inch tape and



              rearranges bits to be readable on IBM 360 equipment.



          2.  Deciphers unique characters In Honeywell environment.



          3.  Transforms CAMP 5-minute-readings to correspond with other



              events recorded by hour or other time increments.
                                      6-8

-------
 L.A. STATIONS
MERGt SUbROUTINE
      I
                                                                                   I
                                                                               ,1
     HEIGHT
SUBROUTINE


INTERPOLATION
MET-TO-POLLUTAHT STA.
SUBROUTINE


CAMP STATIONS
MERGE SUBROUTINE


                                             OATA ASSEMBLY
                                             RAW OATA BASE
                                           BY/STATION BY/HR
                                             STANDARD STAT
                                           SUBSET PROCESSING
                                        STANDARD STAT DATA BASE
                                           PP/TAPE  - PP/FILE
                                                                                    360/67  BATCH 8 TIME-SNARING
                                             DATA ANALYSIS
                                               EXECUTIVE
                                                "CRISP"
                                                           STO.  STAT DATA BASt
                                                               SUBSEJ7IHG
                    FIGURE b-1.  SDC  AIR QUALITY OATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM (AQ/DHAS)

                                                        6-9

-------
          4.   Sorts and/or reformats data to order  data appropriately for




              station data analyses and  to compensate  for  overpunching due to




              use of obsolete EAM procedures (application  of  machine assembly




              programs);  places data in  a guaranteed,  standard  format




              compatible  with FORTRAN processing; and  provides  diagnostic  tests




              and checks.




          5.   Interpolates meteorological data to the  nearest pollutant




              measuring station.




          6.   Computes mixing height from radiosonde data.




          7.   Herges ESSA-WBAN and other dense meteorological data with pollutant




              station data (CO, HC, NO , SO., oxidant  etc.),  as shown in Figure 6-2.
                                      A     fc


          8.   Provides data retrieval, extraction,  subsetting and  format




              capabilities.




          9.   Provides standard statistical data base  files,  and performs




              statistical analysis desired.  Programs  used include rank order,




              descriptive statistics, frequency distributions,  auto- and




              cross-correlations, multiple regression, contingency tables  and




              others.



C.  THE STATISTICAL PROGRAM SYSTEM




          The format of the merged pollutant/meteorological pre-processed  data




file tapes was designed to be directly accessible,  via appropriate structured



control card decks, to a  library of statistical programs.   These included




the following:
                                     6-10

-------
w — Xtt^i". tt^O'ii'  c *** r*f
                                 », r< 4» * >

             O O ^ <. C  t
              *
u. t. c  t o i  c. u C- o w w c i'    c <• f o o c o 0    t c 0 o r u
t- *.. o c- f  o «' c c-  r»    c ft O o p o ft o    o o o o r, .   c- o c> *-
                                               ^ C- 4lr ft C O C? t,1 C C' C W C1 *^ *•* C- r- C '   *- O O '

• *?•*? J,*^
*- ts, tj W * * *- C * V C
S-£H :: j
V i it
•- 1 C X « - Oft4.«****ft
«* t«-C'CL,O*
C*«CcOC4-*'
3 g. O LJ • • *
UO*< *,OCt^tw
o o « * *• o 4 . c o e c-
w. O C- — • *»
X 3 ^ * *
Oc»Oc« • ocr>c o
*" "c?i'n^".r>
< ar *,' r »• *^ **
*j C t —
( w J t ^J V ^' O 3 0 — *0-'0'*--»U'M^O
oooooooc o o c
o» jj c c o t. c^ o o o o o
« sss?£ssssegj
5 B v'-s^.^1:^.^

» « «• v «
« f . V- C,
i* t :» >-. o
4.
* i *• e a •
0 <^ C' C o «
v o c c* , *>
*
•
C C C t O o *
O O o t O j C
» 0 C 0 V 0
(, t. n r> w *-'
!* *
i
f r. o w  O O
e c. o j e- o c
o o o c o c c<
« h> N m c fl 0
!8S5i=888
» C. -» « i C
''Of O C i_ «. C

4>
t*

-•
c
c
c
c
c
n
i
o
§
c-

4»
u

4
o
o
*
«
«
ft
i
c
c
o
^

c

•
fc

K
§
& 1
O (
o <
u <
f , b
( «
*
< ,
*
c <
o *
o <
o<
o '
s<
•^ t
c-- 1,



ft.*
c* c*
>c *
4
*
.• O •
i o *
A *
i *
*
* • • r

?ss
• • *
"4 ^4 N
?*£
,£&
1 4 *"
> 4.' K

« *
e. «
c <
.
t* &
00
eg
Oo
o rt
c r
S8
•J O
C' O
SB
ti



0
o
o
c
c
o
r
c>
o
c
o
CJ
cv
r
C

*»
«
*.

t
-,
O
o
o
c
u
c-
o
?
c
o
0

*
«
£

~
f
C-
o
c

c
f-
r
0
4

«•*
Cj
r*
*

.rr-e» *»***«
*
CO |T, O
•^ j- »—
c
c o c-
o c
o c -^
c o
O C' <-
^, f J *.
o r '3
C (- c
000
•J iT> IN
O O t
O • J O
o r* c> ,
e o f s
O C C1 I
4 IT « ^

•00********
»cc** ******

?* * N
c c o
0 C 0
o o o
C' O O
Cl C O
f kT f•^
c i «.•*•
> . i O
0^§
C «4 fVl
030
o o o
• • *
f- f- f
,.',»?
one
^ o o o
^ -c h-
                                                        6-11

-------
    1.  Rank Order Analysis



          A rank order subroutine was developed and applied to identify "high



oxidant" episode days. In order to reduce the possibility of dealing with data



which do not reflect actual photochemical activity.  The subroutine ranked days



by decreasing levels of average oxidant, peak oxidant, average N0« and peak N02,



and gave the month and day of all values  and the hour the peak values occurred.



This subroutine was applied to each of the 12 air monitoring stations being



studied and served, along with the frequency distribution, as the criteria for



the selection of days for more detailed statistical analyses.  A sample Rank



Order Analysis is shown in Figure 6-3.



          Days were selected primarily on the basis of the peak instantaneous



value of total oxidant concentration which was greater than or equal to a



prespecified value.  The value selected was 7 pphm for the CAMP Cities (Chicago,



Cincinnati, Denver, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and St. Louis) and 14 pphm



for the Los Angeles SCAN Stations (Anaheim, Azusa, Burbank, Downtown Los Angeles,



La Habra and Pasadena.)



    2.  Frequency Distribution and Simple Statistics



          Frequency distributions and simple statistics were computed for each



data element defined in Table 6-1 at each station. ( Each such frequency



distribution consists of a table of observed frequency versus the numerical



value of the variable.  The sample statistics are, for each variable, sample



number, mean, standard deviation, low and high.  Figure 6-4 is an example of the



frequency distribution table for hourly average total oxidant concentration
                                     6-12

-------
               O1 CO
^ x    a
< a.
u> a
(X **
                                                                                           *-, rg r-» »-i P-*   *^     fv
         -

OX    I >
* X.    •f uj
ue a
•i> a
        C! >

          UJ
                                                                                                                          in     TJ
                                                                                                                          X     >
                                                                                                                          o -H  .H
                                                                                                                          1-1     U
                                                                                                                          J3  O  G
                                                                                                                          D  4J  0)
                                                                                                                          <0     3
                                                                                                                              M  O*
                                                                                                                          OT  ai  a)
                                                                                                                          •H T3  W
                                                                                                                          X  M  ,0
                                                                                                                          H  O  3
                                                                                                                                 0)
                                                                                                                              c
                                                                                                                           • i-l  0)
                                                                                                                          r-     ^H
                                                                                                                          SO   -
                                                                                                                          o\   cMtn
                                                                                                                          rH  O  -rt
                                                                                                                             2  W


                                                                                                                          B-g1?
                                                                                                                          w  «  c
5


O
                       <" -^ o
                                                                                 o- -c ^ o* o •-« •*
        u.0
                                                                                                                              *J  tJ
                                                                                                                              c  a)
                                                                                                                                 e
                                                                                                                                 91
                                                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                                                 C
                                                                                                                                 O
                                                                                                                                 o
a.
        I >
M

C—
        51 u.
        i >
O 0.    J- 0.
« O    IM _J

st-
                                                                                                                              oo
                                                                                                                          x  a  a
                                                                                                                          fej i-l  O
                                                                                                                          ^  CO

                                                                                                                              3"«
                                                                                                                              M  PS
                                                                                                                           •  O  (0
                                                                                                                          o-i  ai -a
                                                                                                                           I  T>
                                                                                                                          vo     a>
                                                                                                                              XT)
                                                                                                                          OJ ^1  O
                                                                                                                          U     00
                                                                                                                          3  o) v*
                                                                                                                          M  >» a.
                                                                                                                          •rt  (0  «
                                                                                                                          tu -O =
                                                                                                             itO-C1
                                                                                                             <• m -t
                                                             6-13

-------
*
n
                                                                                                             o


                                                                                                             IM

                                                                                                              •
                                                                                                             u>
 I -4
7
a
UJ
a.
 _1
 3
 t—
 c
                                                                                                  -" •*
                                                                                                             »
                                                                                                             z
                                                                                                             a
                                                                                                             te
                                                                                                             o
       l~
       !>-
       •0

       in
o
a
                                                                                                   -4 m      00
  OO
  oo
OJOO
-lOo
£000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOoOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000000000000000000000000000000
a
o
O
   ^
0*
                                                                                                             2
                                                                                                             <
                                                                                                              L

                                                                                                      «j    Q
                                                                                                        <*»    X'
                                                         6-14

-------
measured at the Pasadena SCAN station.  Figure 6-5 is a statistical strnna/y of




all pollutant and meteorological  variables measurements (.;r computed v^timates)




at the SCAN station located at the U.S.C. medical school.




    3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis




          A multiple regression analysis program was applied to the dal.i for




high-oxidant days for each station (high oxidant days defined by the episode




criteria mentioned previously, namely, oxidant 14 pphm or higher ...l SCAN a tat Long




and 7 pphm or higher at CAMP stations).  In this application, the dependent




variable was related to maximum hourly oxidant, while the independent variables




were based on concurrent and immediately preceding values of contaminants




(CO, NO, N0?, total hydrocarbon, non-methane hydrocarbon) and of weather




parameters (wind speed, pressure, temperature, relative humidity, sky cover and




mixing height).




          Logarithmic indices were used, rather than the directly observed




values, on the premise that frequency distributions for these variables tend to




be lognormal rather than normal.  Further, in empirical studies relating to




variables of this type it is common to use power-law relations and multiplicative




combinations, both of which are compatible with linear regressions on the




corresponding logarithmic indices, but not with linear regressions on the direct




values.  The dependent variable was taken as the common logarithm of the daily




maximum hourly average oxidant, while each of the independent variables was the




mean logarithm of three observed values, viz., the hourly average v- Vic for the




hour of maximum oxidant and the hourly average values for the two hours
                                     6-15

-------
                .» IM  c. o o o <> o o o o o o
             ~OOOOOoOOC.iOO.oOO
             z .o r- o o <:• o C* n o <•• o f- o o
                                                        O
                                                        o
2
o
X
o
                o o o
                a a a    oaaaoouaoo   o
             I O O O    OOOOOOOOOO   O
             OOOO    OCOOOOOOOO   O
             -jooo    o o o 10 o o o r- o o   o
                O O O    OO'">OOOO'">>no   O
                OOOOOOOOOOOOOOC3OOO
I/)

a
z
<
o
                in
                eg
                                              -^ ^ O
                                              ^- (*1 9-
                                               ;g§,
                                        0»
                                        OB
                                                            o o
                                           -I 1*1 0^ •*    1
                                              r.
                                                                                                U U
t-
u
Ul
T
O
oc
Q.
                fj m in o M< in CM    -..-. — ., wl.
                oomomo^f    t<\ -s 13 •$ & &    w
                5OOOOOO10    f*\ m ^« .f fM M    tf\
                Orgrsjomm-t    ovMr^^in    (M
in
U
o

i
a
               .	
                 -0  ^ -C -0 O m -i   <>-t
                 ^iwr»r>mM^4   iNa-
                 05  m oo co « ^- p-   ar-
      coo
      < -i
      M &
      0<

      00
•t
ui
>
O
«5   «
                           o.a.o.CLO.^x.oLUJatZ2«*   o
                           o.a.aa.Q.c.-Q.rc3i:— tuM —
                                                       • at   ac
                                                  .  • vl 3   iu
                                      j         ac o i^ t-  • >
                                      < H-    • — Q. uj < r a
                                      o <   i
                                      >- a    .
                                                       o.
                                                    a  .  a.  •
                                                            3C»
                                                            i o
M  co j: u  a  o
H  U -U  cfl  »  M
eu  -H  cd u  w jo
M  4J  O  CO    gO  O  W

SO  4J W        M-l
    cx     to  r    o
 0)  -H     -HO)
 IH  u   • Ja  co  co
 3  o  «fl w  a  G
 M co w     v  cd
•H  CU  cd  O  T3  Q)
ti,  Q -o u  :    s
                                 6-16

-------
immediately preceding the hour of maximum oxidant.  In effect, the question




being tested was whether maximum oxidant as observed on days of high oxidant




could be related in a statistical sense to other contaminants and weather




parameters taken as multiplying factors.




          As illustrated in Figure 6-6 and 6-7, the program generated regression




coefficients and related statistics for the entire set of independent variables,




then identified the best subsets of the independent variables for all possible




subset sizes and performed equivalent computations for these best subsets.




Coefficients of correlation between the dependent variable and each of the




independent variables were also generated.




          Results are discussed in more detail in subsequent paragraphs.   They




showed, however, that in every case a subset of three independent variables




could be found for which the regression was significant at the 5 percent  level




or below.




    ^•  Auto-correlation and Cross-correlation




          In auto-correlation, a set of values of a variable is arranged  in




chronological sequence, and two series of values are obtained by taking initial




values for two different starting times, each followed by all successive  members




of the same sequence.  Auto-correlation is the determination of coefficients of




correlation between such series of values, and the difference in starting times




of the two series is termed "lag".  A value near +1 indicates that the difference




betwoen values in the sequence, separated by the specified lag, ia -"'dinarily




small relative to the range covered by all the values in the sequence; that is,
                                     6-17

-------
                        
r >-
-J Z
• u.
X C
4 2
Z UJ
x a
C uj
c
y
O
c
UJ
1- I/I
O IX
UJ «!

U'
^ ^~
• z
lu
r- C
•0 Z
I U»
r o.
o o
< c
•J ?
^* •••
X
u u.
C
0
(




uj
K.
•M
I/I

U

a.
9
«j
V
Z 2
C. uj ••« •"<
— ~ 0 0
"* ° ' JL
Otju^-^'n.ni^c ««"i
uj o m o> o J tr « f-
CC O * fM I" a 1*1 • fi
O O OO O 1 U
II II


i
_i :
< a. i
— U. d
h- Ul O
a O 1
4 o a
CB *fl* *O *f ^ rv *t ^
Ci •M^fOl^f^^'t^
c^.**^ (Ntn^TMO
f^ ft» UJ <"! f^J 0* i^ V f>i *4
•f (/•£,''-<«'-«»P^d4-
t 1 O O u C
1 III
1

T
t- of
" J 1
X >

ft' Q IT  m r-
f" ."^ f* pxl 1ft CT1 ij> (O f+
U 1, ^ ISJ Ct- -O C —
t o c c c c c
.
,
c c-
d at - o
< »- 1
c « o

<>U •^^^•tfs^O
>- 111 <0 (\j in O TO »•' rg
^1QODf\iXf«>9'^«^
(» ^ ••< »l d CSJ d
IO C O O OO O
i i
! z1 ;

• ivj o "^ *o cr* co *^ en
I C^Mf-KN*
*t or K r ^ ^ p

IT r- P* • eo • •
! • . • -• • M t-i
o o «. o

0- j '

1 J
; OP

au 1
5 1 :
-*i
'
! UJ • V^ L> •
1 uj' c or i- a CD
r •- nr r- 2 •
— X < i- IA o
i » u. c. C y >/> >
7) C •- C • u u,
r •- C ef C- a u
. c^ x r ui c D
' x o ? > ui t-
cc u. 3 a * «/
in i' i_i « 4>. C1 a
•- •- r j — uj
or a u < C »- o.
r- t- i- »• r < *
«i •- »- C — »- w
o r x t- x v.t-

•»«.
CO
2
«» "-4 ^
O <^
00
1
n



t-
o.
Uw
o
nr

r-* ^ ^
f-4 lO Z
^ O* d
l»l«>
-
o o
1



••4 r4
OC
i i
c c
<*\ o
IM in
•* o-
r~ co
00
1 l

o
o
o
o
<00- ,4
m m »
O03 O
«• in
" o-
•J ac .
0>Oo

• rxj
d •
O
1




cc o e
i



• a
c w
— > K
* C Z
TO «t
T C
>. ,-.
U • il! "»C
> v» C

^ -* *t
oe
                     X  «  •
                        OO
                      U. » CO
                        ^•cr  IN
                        O- O  C'
                        •o m  n

                      i/t<->m   in K
                      cc c m f-
                      co CD * «t
                      C *f IT
                       • •  •  •
                      C OC  C

                      UJU. p- V-
                      I- U. I-  if

                  i    r o s —
                  I    «- O •— O

                      S.5E
                  I    UJ rr u. u,
                        n t-  uj
                      u r^ v  C"1
                  |    C OO U

                  1    «   • u-  •
                      C »- r a
                      d. _j    o.
                      a r K O
                      u'y ^ o
                           UJ
                      C Z — UJ
                      a uj u J

                      ? su"-
                      z r u, h-
                      < o- "• -i    ;
                      t-ios    '
                      (/• I/)O 1
6-18

-------
tn **1 w> <« ! 1 i/»
If a a o i • a ;
ui ' U* 1 1 UJ
J. a »~ o i i- t
_-  ' »*
•a . ; 'i- . .
rf> ' •{? 1 O , » O !
N 0-5 I •» , ft.00 , 00 •
*^ ' * ;
' « • ill
a ! 0 • !
d ' -
**: ** '
f. lf\ ,O -O 1 IM
 i 4> 1 . <«• 1
-• I (7P 1 [ • _< j
.* 1 i IM *
• 1 ' • ' ' • ' '
' 1 *
o •_ o . o
N 00 1 o (M
t * I O f- 1
f\f- ^^ i |
r«o • ! ir> o
* ma o n ' t/io o ; n
Jt • « T « • ' 1
>• 00 i~ 0 O | 1- '
a. c. ' 1 a i
UJ 1 ' UJ UJ 1
U 1 U l U i
* J °" «
UJ' «• 'UJ !.. Ujl'
t- U.IMIT. ^ • ij.fr> ^ K l
r C ir> z , Q if, 1 z |
*" ! *-• i ' *H I
> ' >• i »J
I 1 , i 1 .'
if> K IM ' I op xf (X j
! •*• IA w ' '*->aOO>' •
T ? £ moo I
rv N •!• IM 1- IT „ f.
V\J ift Irt^^lT. V) IS-** *} at 1/1
u >/»••• u, vn • • • u, '
u OOO U. iQOC. u'
Ut , IJJ 1 UJ
!o "!?"" Sr- «c ! UC. J f-0
NIM«"* -IT. Nr4 ITSmC'GC
,*£*"» ^a»IVJ 1 r_4Nvj-g
V/jfiiMTi . ^,Ooro.r- ,,j Ctat^,j.rg
~"<'ri TiC;/ -.-(•(. « 7^.-J ' — — O-CINJ
i^»« C. <»*t ifl... --?•*• I/I....
!fV" '''^"^ L' ^oro UP— ni- ,o v^or-oc
U' 1 o>" — C' »* UJI | Ol/ — O 'M luT 1
^,-f y^p-i- —y eiii-i^- — ry
, O 3U-«» IX« O 3u. < t'. c">
« «J C t> — uj r jf — iu
JJ oc >^f > t- af wit" > t- .1
^ U -u U tu IU U- I
•J ' tX C- (A a c .1^
; • a.. IT
1/1 1 =• ' i 3
•^ v>
^ . I *" trt 1
"• : i "• u. ,
"• ! u. u
w ' PJJ ! PJJ !
° 0 • 0 ,
" 1 ' ° ' " i
* i oc ; ct ;
<•" ' (.•> ' e
'•'?'/• i i uiir 0 * ' a. 0 01 rnivj
n "" <-• i uf r< O T I c.  (>• 1 i
'• .... ,» ].... ^
c . oo co , c. 'c.o'n. Q
'
£' ! o c
K 1 p— 1 (_
1/1 ^ ' I/1 t ^ «X1
* ** . f
U. U. i. t- 1 U u. >. »-
i- " •• r ! >- 11. P- r ;
* UJ . I. -J |, ..j i, |
•»rjr— icr- —
" — u — i ' >^ — l__l) w
L (-5— Ui >-7^ u
-JIN^- ^.^|IL _J(M*-tf^ U'.OU. _jCV-r»*'^l"-
"•• UJ" '•- "• 'ri u.(v uj u , er.
": f* * L- *" u P- i* i -i ,
u r u r — in- c ui r- i _ 1
•', • c \- <.i >~' 1 u • • ' r o c w 1 n i. . •
J " ' •• a n i, , , a a,
f' cr«n» >/>-«/>. u* >•-!*
" r t- . f *' r i~ i. •- n x '•/ f ~
! " <-< u — i •> u in*. »:._!,- u 11 r <_ »
' f c ar^r tori. .r-^t- ri---cu
— o u. s . • i_> — o [. i : .- L> — t. ir u
•• »• o n » x r. ^ ui »- x t- -
[Vr'>- C^—u UJOXl- C.I- — U. Ut7>»-
^1 CX li. v.^ ^ 1/1 I ^| u u. C- „* */, t . T «1
u -Ci o u  u *• — ii_ p. «i (t u n ^
' * » «•»'_! r •- t- n •• ,, u _j 7 i- > i- >
• • .. r i- i '. r — — 3 u p j ' j r •• — — r> in
"»» i/ii/iii» a >r •- i_ i/ 1/ i.. r U.7J-1-K
IM |
0
1 !
c
•~*
m
CO
O IM
•" 1
, '
O '
2 i
*M
M
U. •
in

Q O
a. • •
Ci 0'

J
u -4" i^
Q ifi



IM O' IM
O O' O
—> o- u
•O 0 !*•
bO *-4 4 b .
«/)•••
O C^O
1
1
t
«? l/i -J
r. z «
U -, C 1"
l_. ^, «- c.
n l/> »- *—
T> -iJ <
OOC ~
f!U >
UJ UJ
or Ci






i
U" f*- 01 O*
i, L <•; -.r
f** <"NI ?**»•«
« r t- <«>
C' -4 fv IT

C f C' t1

i
_ J

It U —. i>-
»-- u *- r*
'* L ' < L

^•- C.' -• • l '
•V V "••
I/ • f, II
t (l U U
O h I
1) •— \i f~
C1 1 r '--1

•t •  u h
*< fi ti- _j
>- i f r
i/1 «j/i c. s



















r
o

9
H
U
W
nJ
U]
w

CO
t-1
^;
a

M
a
o
w
M
Ou
w

b-.
O
to
M
M
>H .
p-4 M

5 w

j
§1
M •<
C/5
ui oi
M M
gg
s°
tw
J22
»>. 2
i
^O fi-,
o
OJ
M CO
3 i-l
00 CO
•H <
Cb M
























-------
that a high value is relatively more likely to be followed by another high value



than by a low one.  A coefficient near zero, on the other hand, indicates that a



high value is as likely to be followed by a low value as by a high one, while a



value near -1 suggests that a high value is much more likely to be followed by



a low value than by a high one.



          When applied to hourly contaminant data or weather data, high auto-



correlation coefficients show that hour-to-hour changes in the measuzsmeat



under study are usually of smaller amplitude than the diurnal cycle as a whole.



          To provide sequences of hourly contaminant data for auto-correlation



analysis, the output of the rank-order analysis for each station was scanned



and periods of three or more successive days of high maximum oxidant were



identified.  As an example, the four days from June 2 through June 5 provided



such a period for the Chicago CAMP station; the output of the auto-correlation



program is shown in Figure 6-8.   Lags of one hour to five hours were studied,



for each of four contaminants.  At lag of one hour, coefficients for nitrogen



dioxide and oxidant were near 0.9, while those for nitric oxide and hydrocarbons



were near 0.7.  At lag of three hours, nitrogen dixide and oxidant coefficients



were near 0.5, while nitric oxide and hydrocarbons were near zero.  This sort of



behavior is probably to be attributed to the status of nitric oxide and hydro-



carbons as primary contaminants, more subject to rapid change because of



relatively small shifts in wind direction or in community activity from hour to



hour, while the accumulation or dissipation of the secondary contaminants,-,



nitrogen dixoide and oxidant, is relativfejy insensitive to these shifts.
                                      6-20

-------
'
,11

0
.J

*

II

u
J


II

0
3
eg


H

0
*
-

ii

(J
*

O


II

o
-











ir»
•o
^
o
o
1
o
CO
0
CO
<-»
o
1
"
OJ
o
<-»
"

PI
r-
tr
•—«
PI
0
o
PI
UJ
•£>
sC
"

CJ
0
0
Cȴ
I.)
*



UJ
LJ,
•— 1
>v
cj
0
•~
'X
«w
•o



•"
^.
UJ
SJ



**"
2
p-


_

•^
INJ
n«


^
_L
-O
f^»


s^

— «
(NJ
UJ


^,











n>
P>
»jr

O
in
O

O
««4
»J-
IT
-o
o
j.
OJ
V
u\
cu
"

C,)
u
o
^
t^>
-
UJ
CJ
«l^
X.
O
»••«
U

*z
0
u
Cf
^
P»



~
^^
!«•
r~



*^
~
^~


*••»

«~
UJ
r-


«.
^^
(VI
UJ


-

«^
UJ
JO


-_











r\
•••4
(k.
•O
o

o
c;
<_j
c^
o
•— i
UJ
a
«^
t_j
LJ
a.
t.)
>
J.
_J
*^
a>
00



•*
^ .
o
cr



**
~
0-


^^

^.
c\j
o»


«.

m
u*


_

.~*
a ^
cr


_











eg
HJ
^p
CO
rg
u

rn
a)
UJ
u>
f»
^

r-
o
•g
»T
u>
«

<—•
»•*
u*

SO
o

u
o
c.
o
0
-


H*
^_
*4.
LJ
»M
X
0
_J



«
j_i_
*•<
gj


_^r

**
V
>o


^,











                                         I
                                         bo
                                         rt
                                          O
                                         00


                                         vO
                                          oo
6-21

-------
(In fact, records of continuous monitoring of these contaminants frequently show



rapid changes in nitric oxide concentrations near peak traffic hours.)



          In six other episodes at various CAMP and SCAN stations, the same



auto-correlation behavior was found for oxidant, with coefficients for lag 1 hour



ranging from 0.85 to 0.93.



          Cross-correlation refers to the determination of coefficients of



correlation between levels of different pollutants taken in corresponding time



sequence, with or without the introduction of lag.  Thus with hourly values for



two contaminants, the existence of a coefficient near +1 suggests that the



diurnal variation of the two is quite similar, while a coefficient near -1



suggests that they vary in reciprocal fashion.




D.  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION



          The statistical analysis completed in this project represents, in



effect, a first exploratory Iteration on the data.  The primary objectives were




to:  (1) identify photochemical pollution episode days; (2) explore the ability



of the contaminants and meteorological variables to account for photochemical



pollution episodes, as measured by oxidant; and (3) establish the relationships



that exist among oxidant, hydrocarbons, NO and NO..  Analyses (1) and (2) were



undertaken first in order to identify and validate the sample populations of



interest.  Analyses were also conducted for (3) in the form of correlation,



regression and some contingency studies, the results of which are reported in



this chapter.  However, in view of the extensive analyses which are now possible



on the established data bases, this analysis is less than exhaustive.  It is
                                     6-22

-------
also incomplete with respect to the SCAN network, as five of the eleven .stations




were not included in this study.



          The atation-by-station results of these analyses are described in the




Appendix I of this document.  A summary of the results are shown in Table 6-2




and the following.




    1.  The SCAN Stations as a Set




          With respect to information obtained by rank-order analysis, the six




Los Angeles SCAN stations studied exhibit a good deal of similarity.  For




SCAN stations the modal months of peak instantaneous oxidant concentration




episodes are July, August, and October.  Peak instantaneous oxidant concen-



trations are most apt to occur during the time interval between the 10th and




15th hours with probabilities of around .90.  For all the stations the modal




value of observed oxidant total hourly average concentration is 1 pphm.




          Yearly mean values range from a low of 2.84 pphm for La Habra to 5.4




for Azusa.  The range of interstation observation data variability may be




characterized by a sample standard deviation low of 3.94 pphm for Anaheim to




a sample standard deviation high of 7.12 pphm for Azusa.  More detailed study




of the relative levels of the contaminants  it the SCAN stations yielded




information bearing on some proposed hypothesis or generalizations as to the




relations between contaminants, and their geographical variations.



          Frequency distributions of the hourly values of all variables were




generated for six of the eleven SCAN stations:  Anaheim, Azusa, Burbank,




Los Angeles (DOLA), La Habra, and Pasadena.  Non-blank values were available for




oxidant, carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide for more than 85
                                    6-23

-------
            a  Is s

          ll'sl I I
          U U > *H   j;
          s a i s j s
          0 o a K « »
                           I  ?3.
                         3 i  "A


                         I I  '£

                         8 A|   .«§}

                         5 8  "SS
                         «a  JK
                         s  2  J:-s
                                         r-
                                         vO
                                         co

                                         §
                                         H




                                         I
                                          H
                                          to
                                          M


                                          a
                                          W
CN


VO


 (U

fH

X)
6-24

-------
percent of the 8,760 hours of the year (1967) for all stations except La Habra;




at the latter station, nitric oxide was known for less than 15 percent of the




year.  Total hydrocarbon levels were available for more than 85 percent of the




year for Anaheim, Los Angeles and Pasadena, and for 25 percent of the year for




Azusa, but were missing throughout the year for Burbank and La Habra.  These




frequency distributions (except for La Habra) are depicted in Figures 6-9




through 6-13, showing values of the 50, 75, 90, 95 and 99 percentiles, and the




highest value, of the cumulative distribution of each contaminant, derived from




computer output tables of the type illustrated in Figure 6-4.




          As illustrated in Figure 6-9, oxidant levels at Azusa exceeded those




at the other four stations at all percentiles above the 75th.  Oxidant levels at




Burbank were appreciably lower, and those at Pasadena still lower.  Lowest were




levels at Los Angeles and Anaheim, which were nearly equivalent throughout.




(From the fragmentary data of La Habra, not shown, levels there appeared slightly




lower than those of Anaheim and Los Angeles).  Figures 6-10 through 6-13 show




that Azusa levels for the other contaminants were in each case either lowest or




near the lowest among the five stations.  From this it may be concluded that




a relatively hinh frenuency of occurrence of high| levels of the primary traffic



related contaminants is not required in order to produce a relatively high level




of development of photochemical oxidant at a given location, even within a




single air quality region such as the Los Angeles Basin.




          A concise overview of the relative levels of thest. contaminants at




the five stations is shown in Table 6-3, which shows the rankings of the stations




in order of descending values of the 99th percentlie, for each contaminant.
                                     6-25

-------
                                                 vo
                                                 X
                                                 o
                                                 1
                                                 Ul
                                                 >

                                                 >•
                                                 _l

                                                 I
                                                 2
                                                 LU
                                                 oe
                                                  I
                                                 VO
                                                 cs
  'NOIitfaiNBDNOO


6-26

-------
                                                vo
                                                x
                                                o

                                                o
                                                o
                                                CO
                                                o:
                                                
-------
5   «*
*t   —i

-------
                                                                        SE
                                                                        o
                                                                        CO
                                                                        vo
                                                                        en
                                                                        x
                                                                        o
                                                                        o
                                                                        H-t
                                                                        Qi
                                                                        CtL
                                                                        LU

                                                                        -
                                                                        _1
                                                                        a:

                                                                        o


                                                                        U.
                                                                        O

                                                                        GO

                                                                        O
                                                                        t—*
                                                                        h-

                                                                        CO
                                                                        K—I
                                                                        ac
                                                                        O


                                                                        LU


                                                                        CD"
                                                                        LU
                                                                        CM
                                                                        OC.
iNOUVHiN33N03
                6-29

-------
6-30

-------
Table 6-3.
COMPARISON OF FIVE SCAN STATIONS BY RANKING
RELATIVE TO FIVE CONTAMINANTS (99th PERCENTILE)
                   Ox
              CO
HC
NO
NO,
Azusa
Burbank
Pasadena
Los
Angeles
Anaheim
145
2 1 (1)
324
433
552
5 4
2 1
3 3
1 2
4 5
                         6-31

-------
(With respect to hydrocarbons, Burbank is tentatively assigned the first



ranking on the basis of its high levels of traffic gas constituents as indicated



by carbon monoxide; this assignment is uncertain, however, in view of the lack



of complete agreement in rankings on these two contaminants at the remaining



stations).



          When these rankings are compared, it is seen that there is reasonable



agreement (parallelism) between carbon monoxide and nitric oxide; between carbon



monoxide and nitrogen dioxide, and between nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide.



On the other hand, there is poor agreement or none between other pairs of



contaminants, and there is substantial disagreement (antiparallelism) between



oxidant and nitric oxide rankings.



          Some particularly interesting examples of disagreement (i.e., anomalies



in terms of a hypothesis of parallelism in contaminant rankings) are the



following:




    (1)  Azusa had highest oxidant but lowest HC and NO, and low CO and NO..



    (2)  Anaheim had high hydrcarbons but lowest CO, Ox and N02, and low NO.



    (3)  Burbank had highest CO, N02 and (probably) HC, but only second



         highest Ox.



    (4)  Los Angeles and Anaheim, although having low and very similar oxidant



         levels, had widely different leve's of NO and NO..



         This brief listing of important discrepancies, in effect, suffices to



demonstrate that annual air quality with respect to photochemical oxidants at a



selected location within the Los Angeles Basin cannot be readily deduced from a
                                      6-32

-------
knowledge only of the annual levels of the primary contaminants at that point.



As a corollary, predicting the oxidant levels at a selected location requires
consideration of the daily history of air arriving
at that location, that is,
history in terms of the sources of primary contaminants that accumulate in it,




and the reactions that take place between them while the air is en route to the




selected location.  For this it is necessary to consider the real paths of




motion of the air - an approach which is implemented in the photochemical




environmental simulation model, described in Chapter 7.




          Correlation and regression results are summarized in Table 6-4.  Of




the 9 or 10 independent variables available, carbon monoxide yielded the highest




individual correlation with the dependent variable (maximum hourly average




oxidant) at two stations, Azusa and Burbank; coincidentally, these are the two




stations for which oxidant levels were highest, as discussed above.  For two




other stations, nitrogen dioxide yielded the highest correlation; for the




remaining two stations mixing height was more strongly correlated with oxidant




than was any other contaminant.  In the best subset of three variables, mixing




height appeared for five of the six stations, with Los Angeles the only station




for which this was not true.  Temperature appeared in three of the six best




subsets of three, and carbon monoxide appeared in the same three.  Nitrogen



dioxide appeared in two, as did relative humidity; nitric oxide, pressure, and



sky cover appeared in one each.




          It is interesting that the best subset of three independent variables




proved to be identical (carbon monoxide, mixing height, and temperature) for the
                                     6-33

-------
vO
01
u
c
91 -H
•0 01
•H >
U «
a -i
3

t 3-var table
subset
a
£


87
•H a
U iH
(4 4
-3 S
S «
M W
S3
«
u S
s-s
*3
33 ^







M M 14 14 M
OH ON ON ON ON
ON ON ON ON ON
ON OS ON ON ON







43 r*. f»* s
00 W £ J= 1- *J
•H -H 00 M 3 -^t
v •o *H *H n *  Kit Kit CM >>
8 -4 -3 M •P W O lia-rl O
u B» B J Z ouu
• a a a, -H «j
tsu . g . B - M-HX
Soi 08 08 Q -3 ai ji
U UU UU Z XklM
x%
4J
X
s
£
~ ^ ?
O4 ^S *«* (N| «H
§ § § § i
•**
Soi oo o
in ^ 
-------













tft
W
^d
3


3 u
•3
u
Is

o a
82
*•£
•
4) «
j: «
5j o


a
o
u
-t to «•
S? 9 5 „ S 3
i-t r-l <0
u w ig a a n
<9 Iv O
•p -g u. u u u
S « 3 U 3 3
a« o. 4 u nj «
01 Tf CJ 0)
T> "p 5» a. o*
c 2 e -g a a
•rt -i S c 5 S
> 5 w .* u «


3*0 00 * u"i Ov
oo oo m oo r»

00
<8
0 « ^ - - S
00 it) 00 00 00
(0 ^4 <9 R) « U
*J
10 « (B 10 <0
H W
i i s s s 2
r»» i-T (N O sO *^t !
st *Tt U^ *ff ^ **
r i* r r r r






i

•H 00 \O i* O *O





in r- (N r*. *n 00
00 00 &t 00 00 00


u
V
r-t
00
I
S J! § 2 §
>r4 G i . ^ 0}
O « «9 *- 01 T3
£ in ja c I n
« 3 u 5 «
3 n 3 o n) n
< •< oa o i-i a.
6-35

-------
three stations (Azusa, Burbank and Pasadena) having the highest frequency of



high oxidant levels.  For Azusa the shrunken multiple correlation coefficient



was 0.77, indicating that these three variables could account for about 60



percent of the variability in maximum oxidant for that station.  For La Habra,



a different set of three variables accounted almost completely for the observed



variation, but this is probably an accidental result of the extreme paucity of




data for that station.



          Table 6-5 summarizes the main results of auto-correlation and cross-



correlation analysis.  Oxidant auto-correlations exhibit the behavior described




above, ranging between 0.85 and 0.92 for lag 1 hour.  No noteworthy consis-



tencies appear in the cross-correlation results, except that the highest coeffi-



cients for oxidant against other contaminants are always negative, while those



for oxidant against wind speed and temperature are positive.  No explanation is



known.  However, in the case of high correlations of oxidant against wind speed



(with lag) at Anaheim and Azusa, the two SCAN stations farthest from the center



of Los Angeles traffic, it may be suggested that the daily arrival of the sea



breeze at the station foreshadows the arrival of photochemical oxidants in



polluted air transported from centers of more intense emission of the primary



photochemical contaminants.



    2.  The CAMP Cities as a Set



          The photochemical pollution potential of the CAMP cities appears to



be rather similar if the statistical properties of peak instantaneous and hourly



average values of total oxidant concentrations are taken as criteria.  For all
                                     6-36

-------
CAMP cities high prak oxidant levels are most likely to occur during the summer


months between the 9th and 15th hours.  Yearly mean values for the hourly


average total oxidant concentration range from a low of 2.57 pphm for Washington


to a high of 3.44 for St. Louis.  Standard deviations ranged from a low of 2.02


for Chicago and Denver to a high of 2.3 for Washington.  All CAMP cities recorded


a modal hourly average value of 2 pphm.  Fewer thin 10 percent of all hourly


values in each city reached 7 pphm or more.


          Regression analysis produced predictive formulas yielding, at the


worse, between -37 percent and +58 percent relative error with 95 percent


probability.  Of the 8 or 9 independent variables available, which did not


include mixing height, nitric oxide occurred in five of the six best subsets of
                                                  i

thr<->e independent variables; carbon monoxide appeared in two, total hydrocarbons


and non-methane hydrocarbons each in one.  Again, temperature occurred in five


of these best sets of three variables, wind speed in two, and sky cover in one.


No single, set of three variables was best for more than one station.  No best


subset yielded a higher shrunken multiple correlation coefficient than Denver


(0.57), for which the regression accounted for about 30 percent of the


variability in hourly oxidant values.


          Auto-correlation analysis showed uniform high correlation between


successive hourly total oxidant averages.  Cross-correlation analysis showed a


strong negative serial correlation between total oxidant and NO as expected.


Table 6-6 and 6-7 summarize the findings.
                                     6-37

-------
                             >*4 Itf

                              §5
                             O J
Oi
ON
»<
<7<
01
                              e tj -i
                              «i « o
                              J< »-4 •*
                              e u w
                              3 U «M
                              p U »
                              JB O O
                              en o y
VJ


§
 I
vO
"3 B
U -3
(Q *J
T3 tO
B U
(0 t
U U
W) CO










0)
i-H
jQ
nj
•~4
Ui
O

1 0)
.£>
w 3
M cn
ftj
&
a
•H
C
O
iJ
flj ,-K
iH 01
0) 3
1^ «-*
S 3
U

tA 3
•£ O
00 «
CO






0)
W
3
«J

g

*
8



^

41
O.
0)
•g
•J
o«
Csl
o
iH












£
3
U

-------
                                                                   no u no
                                                                   a  a  t
                                                                              o
                                                                              eo
                                                             00 » 00
                                                             «  ns  n)
Oi
O

V
CO

O    •
OS  r~
U  vo

Q  rH

1    ^
O  O
    H
P-.  CO
C
W
    x
                             ffs
                            •H  O
                             O 'H
                             00 O
                             •-4  Wl
                             3: o
 O (Q
 4-1 rH
 O 0)
a, u
   O

 sv
 
-------
    3.  Comparison of the SCAN Stations and CAMP Cities




          Comparative information from simple statistics on oxidant hourly




values for the SCAN and CAMP networks were given in Table 6-3.




          The following inferences may be drawn by comparison of the results




shown in the tables:



          •  In general, the oxidant highs at the SCAN stations are one to




             three times as large as the largest CAMP city oxidant high.




          •  The SCAN stations exhibit much larger interstation and intra-




             station data variability than the CAMP stations.





          •  Mixing  height plays the role  of the most  frequently appearing




             variable  in the  "3-variable best fits" at the SCAN stations,




             while  temperature plays the corresponding role at the CAMP




             stations, where mixing height was not available.




          •  The shrunken correlation coefficients corresponding to the




             3-variable regressions are higher at the  SCAN stations.




          •  Total oxidant auto-correlation functions are very similar for




             both networks.




          •  There are significant cross-correlations of total oxidant




             with other meteorological variables for both networks.



          •  Hourly  average oxidant during selected episodes at some SCAN




             stations  showed high positive cross-correlation with wind




             speed,  whereas this was not true for the episodes investigated




             at CAMP stations.  In the latter, cross-correlation with wind




             speed were mainly low or negative.
                                     6-40

-------
    4.  Additional Analysis Possible



          The initial analyses that were planned were completed within the



resources available for this purpose.  In general these analyses do not con-
                                           i


stitute a full exploitation of the analytical potential inherent in the special



data bases that were constructed.  Further analysis, especially discriminant



analysis, appears to be indicated, with emphasis on the SCAN data.   In



particular:



          1.  Frequency distributions for high oxidant days should  be compared



              with those for low oxidant days, to determine where the significant



              differences in the variables occur.



          2.  Frequency distributions should  be obtained by hour of the day, and



              the values of all variables of  interest should be retrieved and



              studied.



          3.  Data on non-methane hydrocarbons for Los Angeles should be collecte



              and utilized in this study.



          4.  More hypothesis formulation and testing should be performed.   In



              particular, the relationship among values of  contaminants in the



              morning and varies of oxidants  during the day should  be explored,



              as suggested _n i.  pter 5, Air  Quality for Hydrocarbons,  (OHEW,



              PHS, EHS, NAPCA, March, 1970).



          5.  The degree of agreement (cross-correlation) between stations  in



              the same  air quality region, and the degree of dependence or



              independence of the variables should be established.



          6.  The extent of the smog cloud should be established.
                                     6-41

-------
                                  CHAPTER 7


                 DIGITAL SIMULATION OF PHOTOCHEMICAL POLLUTION

                                                                      Page
                                                I

A.   INTRODUCTION                                                       7-4


B.   THE REACTIVE POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SIMULATION MODEL (REM)        7-6


    1.   The Control Program                     j                       7-7


    2.   Meteorological Module                                          7-9


    3.   Ultraviolet Module                                             7-9


    4.   Transport Mechanism                                            7-10


    5.   Source Emissions                                               7-10


    6.   Diffusion Module                                               7-10


    7.   Chemical Kinetics Module                                       7-11


    8.   The Numerical Integration Module        '                       7-1]


C.   CURRENT STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY OF THE MODEL                7-12


D.   MODEL VALIDATION                                                   7-13


    1.   Thirty-One Step Mechanism                                      7-13


    2.   Chemical Species Utilized                                      7-17


    3.   Trajectory Simulation                                          7-20


K.   APPLICATION OF THE MODEL                                           7-26
                                      7-1

-------
                                  CHAPTER  7

                                LIST OF FIGURES


Figure                                                                 Page

,  7-1    . . ., General Model Architecture                                  7-8

  7-2       Station Locations and Simulation Trajectories               7-14

  7-3       Contaminant Concentrations vs Simulated Time Lapse,         7-24
             Runs 1 and 3.

  7-4       Contaminant Concentration vs Simulated Lapse Time,          7-25
             Run 2.
                                      7-2

-------
                                 CHAPTER 7

                               LIST OF TABLES


Table                                                                 Page

 7-1       31-Step Reaction Mechanism, Reaction                       7~15
             Rates and Species Numbers.
                                               i
 7-2       Species Involved in 31-Step Mechanism.                     7-18
                                               i
 7-3       Initial Conditions for Simulations.                        7-21

 7-4       Photochemical Model Calculated vs Observed Air             7-22
             Pollutant Concentrations.

 7-5       Calculated Photochemical Contaminant Concentrations        7-28
             for Lennox-Pasadena Trajectory, with Varied
             Emissions Input.

 7-6       Calculated Contaminant Levels from Simulation Runs         7-30
             with Modified Emissions Input, Arranged for
             Easy Comparison.
                                     7-3

-------
A.  INTRODUCTION




          Air quality models are tools that can be used in decision-making,




particularly in the areas of planning, implementation and evaluation of air




pollution control programs.  Because computer-based models can handle many




parameters and data files and rapidly perform computations, they can be




conveniently used to analyze and predict pollution trends and episodes, assess




the effects of pollution damage and alternative control plans, explore contaminant,




environmental and source interactions, and train students and workers in the




mechanisms and control of the air pollution system.




          Acceptance of models in actual decision-making will depend on the




degree of confidence that can be placed in the validity and logic of the




mechanisms employed and the amount and quality of data available to test and




use the models.  Model building, therefore, should be looked upon as an




evolutionary process—one that grows with the normal processes of analysis,




control and evaluation.  In particular it should interact with and contribute




to the design of data collection systems and the management and analysis of




aerometric, source emission and other needed data.



          Models will have practical utility to the degree they reflect




important aspects of physical and chemical reality.  This requirement is




best satisfied by the dynamic simulation model in contrast to statistical




(e.g., regression) or limited empirical (e.g., diffusion) models which are




based on patterns and which resort to artificial expedients to fit parameters.
                                      7-4

-------
          Most air quality models in current use may be characterized as




diffusion models.  These are based on an empirical relationship, the




diffusion equation, which describes a pattern of contaminant concentrations




in an atmosphere surrounding a point source of emissions.  The pattern described




by this equation is static, i.e., does not vary with time.  The diffusion




equation is intended to apply only to situations of constant emission rate,




constant wind direction and constant wind speed, and it would require that




these conditions remain constant for an adequate period prior to any test of




applicability.




          An air quality model for photochemical contaminants is less amenable




to the diffusion model approach, since the diffusion equations contain no




factors to represent the interaction of contaminants.  Such interactions are




in no way related to spatial position, wind velocity, or distances from




emission points.  The development of important photochemical secondary con-




taminants, such as ozone, normally requires that the period of residence of




the primary emissions in the atmosphere be more than an hour, even in bright




sunlight.  Experience has shown that existing diffusion models are highly




unreliable in predicting concentrations of even non-reacting contaminants at




distances from their sources corresponding to an hour's air movement.




          A fully scientific air quality model for photochemical contaminants




would clearly require a mathematical framework related to the chemistry of




the photochemical contaminants.  It would be able to predict concentrations




of a large number of primary and secondary contaminant species as a function




of time at any point in the region of interest, and auxiliary computer programs






                                      7-5

-------
could derive, from these detailed predictions, predicted values of any desired




air quality indices.   A reactive model may represent the more general case of




air quality modeling since relatively non-reactive contaminants, such as carbon




monoxide, SO. and particulates can also be followed in the system.



B.  THE REACTIVE POLLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL SIMULATION MODEL (REM)




          A simulation model embodying current state-of-the-art principles of




photochemical smog has been developed for the National Air Pollution Control




Administration by the System Development Corporation under Contract CPA 22-69-108.




The environmental mechanisms employed reflect those described in Chapter 3,




Atmospheric Physics and Meteorology and the kinetics of chemical reactions are




derived from those reviewed in Chapter 4, Atmospheric Reactions.




          The structure of the computer program is basically that of a




detailed episode model for chemical kinetics, with subroutines for estimating




the location of the air parcel trajectories and the associated values of




ultraviolet irradiance, mixing height, input of emissions from vehicular




traffic and diffusion of contaminants from stationary sources*.  The geometric




setting is a standard two-dimensional urban grid system.  Coded in Fortran IV




for IBM Systems 360/50 and 67, a control program outputs parcel positions



and pollutant concentrations at previously specified instants in simulated




time.  A meteorological subroutine interpolates wind and other data from




input values at weather stations to points along the trajectory.  A traffic




subroutine generates emissions as a function of location and time of day, based




on generalized or specific assumptions about traffic density and emission




factors.  An ultraviolet irradiance subroutine computes the relative rate of
* A mathematical description of the model is contained in Appendix II.
                                      7-6

-------
photolysis of nitrogen dioxide as a function of time of day, and a diffusion




subroutine estimates contributions from upwind stationary sources to the parcel




being followed.                                !




          The general architecture of the model is shown in Figure 7-1.  The




functional elements of the model may be summarized as follows:




    1.  The Control Program




          The Control Program accepts input data (the conditions specified




for a given simulation), controls the logical sequence and temporal flow of




the simulation, and outputs desired information.  The inputs and outputs




currently include the following.
               Input




    Desired trajectory start position




         and time.




    Wind speed and direction.




    Barometric pressure.




    Temperature.




    Cloud Cover.




    Relative humidity or dew point.




    Station or receptor point position




        and elevation.




    Solar zenith angle.




    Radiosonde curves or mixing heignt.




    List of chemical species and initial




        concentrations.
            Output




Pollutant concentrations.




Mixing depth  (along the  trajectory).




Emissions (along the trajectory), HC, NO.




Trajectory time and coordinate




     positions.




Reaction Rates.




Rates of change of the pollutants.
                                      7-7

-------
                                     UJ
                                       BS
0
o
oc:
Q.
§
3
o
           oo
o
O
                      S
                      o
           o
           *•—I
           0£
O Z
>-> O
u. •—
U- 
                                       s
                                                      QC
                                                      UJ


                                                      8
                                                      S  S
                                                      S5
                                           UJ
                                           DC
                                           CO
                                           UJ
                                           oc
                                           o.
                                                      UJ
                                                      oc
                                                       UJ
                                                       &

                                                       5
§


5
^•4

8
                                                         SEt
                                                                       2
                                                                    UJ
                                                                    DC
                                                                    O
                                           UJ
                                           I
                                           s
                                           CD
                                                                    UJ
                                                                    oc

                                                                    ta
                                                      o  u-
                                                      2:  o

                                                      S3
                                                          UJ
                                          7-8

-------
            Input (Continued)




   Rate constants.




   Traffic emissions (vehicle miles and distribution)




   Stationary source data, stack height, diameter,




       temperature, exit velocity, emission rate.




          With minor program modifications, any of the inpvit datu can be standard-




ized as "fixed" parameters, or parameters can be modified to reflect inputs




which are desired to alter the design characteristics of the photochemical




system.  Thus the inputs can be made limited and simple or extensive and complex




by presetting certain values within the code itself and reading in others at




run time.




    2.  Meteorological Module




          This consists of a series of subroutines which accepts actual wind




velocity, temperature, pressure, humidity, cloud cover data, radiosonde and




height above sea level for spatial interpolation to pollutant column position,




e-stimation of mixing depth, and for calculation of time derivatives.  Temperature




and pressure inputs are required for the uy_ module, for estimations of horizontal




diffusion, and for the source emission inputs in order to apply gas laws to




estimating concentration-time derivatives in the column.




    3.  Ultraviolet Module




          This subroutine calculates a diurnal uv function based ,  • neasure-




ment of cloud cover, latitude and local calendar time.  The module computes




as a function of time and as a subset of the meteorological topographical




variables the specific ultraviolet absorption rate of NO .
                                     7-9

-------
    4.   Transport Mechanism




          This mechanism is an integral part of the Chemical Kinetics Module




as described below.  The transport of air parcels is determined by an inter-




polated trajectory based on actual wind direction and speed and other meteorological




data derived from a "dense" network of meteorological stations.  The present




version operates from a data base of 22 wind stations.  It has a capcity to




handle 32 stations.






    5.  Source Emissions




          The subroutine computes as a function of time the perturbative




time rate contributions of NO, CO and propylene by application of emission factors




to vehicle miles determined on the basis of grid distributed percentages of




total vehicle miles, and diurnal mileage variations.  The Los Angeles Basin is




subdivided into a grid system of 784 equal 4-square-mile squares corresponding




to a 56-mile by 56-mile square total area.  The model also includes characterizing




data for 12 large power plant sources.  It has the capacity to accept other




source emission input on demand.  Stationary source emissions  are computed by




 the  Diffusion Module.



     6.  Diffusion  Module




           The model calculates mixing  height  and  assumes  instantaneous vertical




mixing  in  the air  parcel as a simplifying assumption.  The trajectorized air




parcel  is  geared  to accept variable  area  source  (grid) emissions, e.g., traffic




emissions.  Since  stable conditions  apply,  lateral losses  and  g*ins  from the




air  parcel are assumed  to be equal.  The  model contains an optional  horizontal




diffusion  subroutine for estimating  downwind concentrations from large





                                       7-10

-------
stationary sources, where stack height and other stack parameters are to be




taken into account.  This subroutine computes the perturbative time rale




concentrations of pollutants from large upwind sources that contribute to the




trajectory air parcel of interest.




    7.  Chemical Kinetics Module




          This is a "reactor" mechanism, i.e., chemical reaction;;- are Caking




place continuously within a moving parcel of air.  This module has operated on




13-41 steps and is based on a sequence of stoichiometrically valid elementary




reaction steps, previously validated against chamber data.  The current




version contains a 31-step mechanism (see Table 7-1).  This mechanism preserves




the flexibility of chemical detail necessary to relate to source emission




species (primary contaminants) of interest on the one hand, and to permit




following of the spatial and temporal distributions of secondary contaminant




content rations of interest on the other.  The reaction steps, reaction rates




and chemical species are easily modified and expanded on demand.  Chemical




muchan isms corresponding to different hypotheses can be input on short notice




and tntL-gratcd with the other environmental and meteorological mechanises




of the model.




          This module computes the total time derivative of each of the




photochemical pollutants (or reactants).  This is accomplished by adding the




perturbative derivatives input from the other modules to the con••-•onding




right-hand side terms of a set of standard chemical kinetics ordinary




diitorential equations.  (The module also utilizes the wind velocity outputs




from  the Meteorological Module as the time derivatives of the position vectors




i;.at  lit the air parcel trajectory.)




                                     7-11

-------
     8.  The Numerical  Integration Module


           On  the basis of  derivatives  computed  from  the  Kinetics Module,  the


 Numerical  Integration  Module  integrates  all  parcel pollutant  concentrations


 and parcel positions  forward  in simulated  time.   This  module  is a  standard


 numerical  integration  program based  on Hamming's  linear, multistep predictor-


 corrector  method.


 C.   CURRENT STATUS  AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY OF THE MODEL


           A prototype  version of the model has  been  programmed and is  in  the


 validation and optimization phases.  To  arrive  at this stage  (1) each  submodule


 was coded  for operation and debugged under time-sharing; (2)  a module-by-module


 maximum time-sharing  usage approach  was  utilized  to  simultaneously maximize


 program development speed  and minimize computer time costs;  (3) only after


 each submodule was  reviewed for computational correctness  was the  totality


of modules  linked, interfaced, and compiled together  with the  main  control


program.


           The model is designed to be  flexible  and expandable. For example

                                                                      •
 any reaction  mechanism, chemical species of  interest,  reaction rates,  traffic


 and stationary source  information, and solar zenith  angle  diurnal  curve is


 readily inserted.   The first  versions  of the model delivered  to NAPCA


 include the  following optional features.


     1.   A  31-step  reaction mechanism.


     2.   A  mixing height determination  routine (the model provides  for both


         an A.M. and P.M. curve).


     3.   One  bolar  zenith angle curve.




                                       7-12

-------
    4.  Areal traffic ratios based on I960 data a., obtained from Teagu<  and




on a diurnal traffic volume distribution curve.  Los Angeles daily vehicle




mileage for 1969 has been estimated at 120,000,000 miles from data supplied




by the State of California.




    5.  Characterizing data for 12 stationary sources.  These include exit




velocity, height of stack, diameter of stack, height above sea level, temperature,




and emission rate in pounds per hour, as obtained from local power plant sources.




D.  MODEL VALIDATION




          Preliminary validation runs of the model have been conducted through




a .series of .simulations representing conditions in the Los Angeles Basin on




September 30, 1969, a day on which elevated levels of oxidant were recorded




at various monitoring stations in the Air Pollution Control District network.




The trajectories generated by computer runs for this day are shown in Figure




7-2 and postulated rate constants in Table 7-1.




          Input for these simulations consisted of weather data collected from




22 meteorological stations for September 30 and values of nitrogen dioxide,




nitric oxide and ozone concentrations as observed at a chosen station at a




chosen time of day on September 30.  In addition, values for concentrations of




hydrocarbons were arbitrarily assigned for the input, inasmuch as hydrocarbon




readings were not available.  For carbon monoxide a starting level of 5 ppm




was assumed.  Contributions of oxides of nitrogen from stationary sources were




 .ssumed negligible.




    *••  Thirty-One Step Mechanism




          The mechanism incorporated in the kinetics module for these simulations




was a set of 31 elementary (or quasi-elementary) steps, derived by simplification






                                      7-13

-------
                                                           CO
                                                           W
                                                           H
                                                           CO
                                                           2
                                                           O
                                                           1
                                                           g>
                                                           •H
                                                           Pb
7-14

-------
        <•> o O O O -• •» ir  O o O <
        PJ                f* t-4
       lc\jrn>-<to
                                                          -4 o  * r- r- r- r- «
                                                                                    r- r- o<
                                                       CD Q. ^
— <  m -i
z X  O C  i/>
   o    a  a
r  uj    O uj
c i     ui —
         *- ct
cc
O
         C' O
         o  c/
         C  O
         O  C>
         O  O
         o  c
         e  -4
O (Vf i
O o I

i.  C.
o c
c  o
i.) o
'-> O
C  f

f  c
                          —1 (Vj I
                         • C C1 i
                                         IT  C.
                                         o  o
                                         O  O
                                         o  c
                                         C'  O
                                         0  O
o
o O
o c1
O '">
L  C
c o
o O
o  >
C' C
 3 O
O C
                       o o

                       c c
                       C I
                       o o
                       C- o
                       O O
                       I o
                       O C
                        •
 C o
i O C

i O o
• o o
' <-. C
' O ^
I (M (M
 00

 r c
' C o
i -J o
I C C'
I C- 'J
 o o
                                                             OoOOC't~OOOOOCl
                                                                         I
                                                                        o c c
                                                                          . o o
f • c  o i.  o O  o
o o o o  o c  <->
o o o c  c, o  r>
O o d o  C) C  O
O o C.  O  < i O  O
<"• C  C  i •  o v  C
c c  c
o o  c>
O C  o
O C  C
o c  o
J O  O
D r o
C> C  O
000
C  C' O
O '3 O
o & o
3 C O
C  Oo
                                                                        rg p» rv O X
                                                                        c c r j   r
         X  +
         +  p
         z o
                                                                                          r*% l\J Hi
                                                                                          X O X
   5Om    rr-i"f\j»     r>^ip*MC'-ic»v****xc'
   *Crv**  *LJ + r*%*ccoOrn'^XLJ*c:c  CCo*
rgm7C'v^rvj  + roC'"*JU.iirf*\jx»-l^''^ITr  r  *fo
ocizcosooza + xiifvjpuri  i.Xo'jXx'"!

 ii ii   ii ii  ii  "it  ii  ii ii  ii  n  n n  ii  H  ii  n o  n   n   n  n   ii  ii  c;  ii
      C                                   C     II                    II
      oj   i                              O *;                   fsi    PJ


      PJ                           *iPjC'l**PJ    P*TCXJCC-^O
   rOOC     p«T    7-3       P+C'+i^jrvOCCcOTLJ*^**
cjOi^ic*rj**r"cc^i  + r  -3tr*»   »**  +  *r+c<_

 *p«i<»ti»i +  +op4*p  ++("<*.  n iii  fi iii  3  ;rxmxi
fCCCae  *ODOXXXXX«MP. Mir  «•  r  r>l»-r   f\.XP,n
aZZZZ^XZ^'ZoOuJUUoC.tJOV'l^l-'U^O^C'OO
                                                                                                                     I
                                                                                                                    r-.
                                                                                           CO
                                                                                          H
                                           7-15

-------
of a 40-step mechanism previously validated in simulation of irradiation




chamber experiments (see Chapter 4, Section F-4).   Details of this mechanism




(see Table 7-1) are as follows.




          Of the 31 steps listed, the first three are the universally recognized




set constituting the basic nitrogen dioxide photolysis cycle, discussed in




Chapter 4, Section D-l.  Reaction 4 is the well-recognized oxidation of




nitrogen dioxide by ozone, which produces the standard form of nitrogen trioxide.




Reaction 5 disposes of the nitrogen trioxide by formation of nitric acid




vapor. (This is an example of the use of a pseudoelementary reaction to simplify




the required computations: the rate listed is actually that of the bimolecular




association of the trioxide with the dioxide to form N-0., nitrogen pentoxide




(or nitric anyhydride).  It is assumed that nitric acid is formed rapidly,




and that it is the only important product derived from the anhydride.  This




being the case, it is unnecessary to compute the concentration of nitric anhydride




as an intermediate, and unnecessary to specify the concentration of water




vapor.




          Reactions 6 through 13 are inorganic reactions.  All occur by



bimolecular collisions except reactions 9 and 11, in which the presence of a




third molecule is required for stabilisation by removal of kinetic energy.




(In such cases, the rate factor provided is a pseudoconstant, which incorporates




the concentration of inert molecules as discussed in Chapter 4, Section F-3.)




          Reaction 14 is provided to test whether the presence of rei.'.":i"/ely




large concentrations of carbon monoxide could be expected to have detectable
                                      7-16

-------
effects on the rate of consumption of reactants in the photo-oxidation i.ystem.



          Reactions 15 through 30 provide for the consumption of hydrocarbon,',



(typified by propylene) and their degradation to, molecules of smaller carbon



number through chains of free radical reactions.  Reactions 17, 18, and 30 are



postulated not to require trimolecular collisions; these are pseudoelementary



steps in which it is assumed that a virtual equilibrium is established between



a free radical and molecular oxygen as reactants and an oxygenated free radical



intermediate.  Reactions 24 and 25, on the other hand, might be considered to



require essentially trimolecular collisions.  Reaction 27 is a speculative



chain branching step, incorporated for exploratory purposes.



          Reaction 31 allows for effects of less reactive hydrocarbons.  For



the sake of simplicity, these hydrocarbons (labeled DUMHC) are assumed to have



the same molecular formula as propylene, and to yield the same products



as propylene on reaction with oxygen atoms.  The rate constant of this reaction,



however, is assumed substantially smaller than that for propylene.



          Termination reactions between all free radical species present are



also assumed to be part of the mechanism.  Although these reactions are not



explicitly included in the list of elementary steps, their effect is incorporated



in the programming of the kinetics module.  They are assumed to have a uniform


                       3     —1   -1
rate constant of 1 X 10  pphm  min  .  Products from these termination reactions,



however, are not included among the products tabulated in the simulation.



    2.  Chemical Species Utilized



          Species tabulated as reactants or products in the 31-step mechanism



are listed in Table 7-2.  Of these, the first four represent the components
                                      7-17

-------
          Table 7-2
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
N02
NO
°3
C3H6
HNO
CH CHO
HCHO
CO
CH3ON02
C2H3N°5
Fixed 02
DUMHC
N03
H
OH
H02
CH3
CH30
CH302
C2H3°
C2H3°2
C2H4°2
0
SPECIES INVOLVED IN 31-STEP MECHANISM
          nitrogen dioxide
          nitric oxide
          ozone
          propylene (or reactive hydrocarbon)
          nitric acid vapor
          acetaldehyde
          formaldehyde
          carbon monoxide
          methyl nitrate
          peroxyacetyl nitrate
          fixed oxygen parameter (see text)
          less reactive hydrocarbon
          nitrogen trioxide
          hydrogen (free atom)
          hydroxyl (free radical)
          hydroperoxyl (free radical)
          methyl (free radical)
          methoxyl (free radical)
          peroxymethyl (free radical)
          acetyl (free radical)
          peroxyacetyl (free radical)
          acetaldehyde oxide (or "zwitter ion")
          oxygen (free atom)

-------
most often monitored in connection with photochemical smog, nitrogen dioxide,




nitric oxide, ozone and hydrocarbons, respectively.  Nitric acid (species 5)




is auwpected of being a major product in the photo-oxidation, but is almost




never quantitatively measured in the atmosphere.  Aldehydes, represented by




acetaldehyde (species 6) and formaldehyde (species 7) , are known to be




formed, but quantitative information on atmospheric levels is scarce.  Methyl




nitrate (species 9) and peroxyacetyl nitrate (species 10) are assumed to be




the principal organic nitrogen-containing products.




          "Fixed 0 ", listed as species 11, is not a real chemical species




but n chemical parameter included here for convenience.  It represents the




amount of molecular oxygen incorporated into products of the reaction complex;




as such it is not readily subject to experimental validation.  Molecular




oxygen produced in steps 3, 4, 10 and 13 is registered negatively in this




parameter, which may therefore legitimately acquire negative values under




some > Lrcumslances.




          Species 12, "DUMHC," is provided as a less reactive hydrocarbm,




^anticipating only in Reaction 31.  Species 13 through 23 are all intermediate




compounds, assumed not to accumulate to appreciable concentrations.  Species 13




through 21 are all odd-electron species.  Nitrogen trioxide (species 13) is




the first product of oxidation of nitrogen dioxide by ozone, but reacts very




rapidly with either nitrogen dioxide or nitric oxide.  Hydrogen atoms




(species 14) and seven free radicals (species 15 through 2JN alro *, j.1 ia




the odd-electron category.  The remaining intermediate species utilized In




this mechanism are a hypothetical acetaldehyde-oxide or zwitter ion (species 22),
                                      7-19

-------
and the free oxygen atom (species 23).
    3.  Trajectory Simulation
          Initial conditions imposed in the various simulations are indicated
in Table 7-3 and calculated vs. observed values at terminal points for five
trajectory runs are shown in Table 7-4.  In the first run, the starting
location and time were set to downtown Los Angeles at 1:00 P.M., and a simulation
time of one hour was specified.  The trajectory generated in the simulation
moved toward the northeast, for a total distance of about six miles;
computer running time was about 4 minutes, for a ratio of simulation time to
run time of about 16 to 1.
          The second run computed a trajectory of nearly 5 hours, starting
in West Los Angeles at 10:00 A.M.  This showed the original air parcel
moving almost due north across the Santa Monica mountains and eventually
arriving in the San Fernando Valley.  Run time was nearly 40 minutes in this
case, for a ratio of simulation time to running time about 8 to 1.
          A third run was undertaken, using the same starting location and time
as the first run, but allowing for three hours of simulated time lapse rather
than one, to enable the trajectory to develop closer to the air monitoring
station in Pasadena, thus generating simulated contaminant concentrations
which could be reasonably compared with observations from that station.  This
run yielded a simulation time ratio of sixteen to one, in agreement with
run one.
          A fourth run was computed.; starting at the Los Angeles International
Airport at 11:00 A.M., and terminating after four hours at Pasadena.  This
                                      7-20

-------
           Table  7-3.   INITIAL  CONDITIONS  FOR SIMULATIONS.
Starting Point



Starting Time



Initial NO,,, pphm



Initial NO



Initial 0_



Initial C.H..
         J 0


Initial DUMHC



Rate constant, step 13



Rate constant, step 21



Rate constant, step 22



Rate constant, step 25



Rate constant, step 27



Rate constant, step 28



Rate constant, step 29



Rate constant, step 30
Simulation
No. 1
DOLA
1300
13
1
15
50
50
100
10
140
10
10
10
10
10
No. 2
WLA
1200
14
1
9
50
50
100
10
140
10
10
10
10
10
No. 3
DOLA
1300
8
5
17
50
50
20
5
70
1
1
5
1
1
No. 4
LAX
1100
18
7
2
50
50
20
5
70
1
1
5
1
1
No. 5
LB
0800
22
38
1
50
50
20
5
70
1
1
5
1
1
                                   7-21

-------
             CO
             U
 I
r^    co
      M
 0)    O
rH
43    CO
 CO
H    CO


CJ
P3

C?
55

0
Z


en
0






































^
§
5
o
^
§
0
5
8
o
^
S
5
o
|
S
2
M
H


l •]
|j
M
y
H
H
0
Z
H

3
g_|
CO


O
S3
M
H
58
EH
CO


^
P

W
a
o
s


i* *
M
P9
O
*
1
o
CO
M
O
1J
CO
PQ
O

prl
5
H
H


S3
O
f-|



*
CM
rH
00
rH

^
O

CO
rH
^^
m

o
0
sf
rH




g
O
4J
0
O
Q


O
O

rH




rj
O
44
O
Q


rH


4g
^























CO
01

01
oo
(3

CO
0







CO
CD
•H

00
a
w
,3












•K
iH

H
i-l

rH
O

in
-^
vO

0
O
m
rH





CO
T3
0)
CO
01
oi


o
0
o
rH






3
o
P


CN


^
^




•K
•k
CM
CO

0~
H
H
rH

m
^^
CN
rH
O
O
m
i-l




(0
0)
•a
l
rH
0
o
CO
I-l




§
0
4J
g
&


o
0
rH
rH





^
I
Ol


-*


PQ


«
*
•K



















CO
01
•H
01
00
C

00
J

CO
•3

























CO
01
oo
CO
0)
CO
IH
3
O
43

01
M
CO
CO
3
rH
CO
^

•o
CD
£j
01
CO
fN
o
»
CO
c
o
•rl
44
CO
3
0
i-l
CJ

CO
3
O
01
a
CO
44
(3

4J
CO
a
•H
• 0)
"-
cO

CO
01
^
CO
^

•o
01
44
3
(X
e
0
CJ


*




















































•
CO
44
CO

•a
01
•a
^i
o
CJ
0)


o
Z

•K
•K
q;
0)
a
0)
o
o.
IH
01

44
0

•o
a
CO
01
3
•u
01
O
o
a

a
0
iH
Cfl

bO
01
a
•H
i-H
<0
CJ
- 1

0)

P
c

•a
0)
N
•H
B
•H
44
Pu
0

-------
trajectory showed the parcel moving towards downtown Los Angeles and paralleling




run three to Pasadena.  The ratio of simulation time to running time was about




fourteen to one.




          Finally, a run on a starting location in Long Beach at 8:00 A.M.




yielded a much smaller simulation time ratio, near unity, with relatively




short travel distance toward the north.  This timing anomaly may be explained




by the large magnitude of traffic pertubation derivatives induced by small




computed mixing heights.  Indeed, it has been subsequently observed that the




smaller these traffic pertubations, the greater is the simulation time ratio.




          Contaminant concentrations calculated from the simulations are shown




as functions of simulated elapsed time in Figures 7-3 and 7-4.  Values for




nitrogen dioxide, propylene and ozone for runs 1 and 3 appear in Figure 7-3.




The obvious differences in simulated behavior of the contaminants in these




two runs result mainly from changes in selection of rate constants for




certain elementary steps.  These changes, indicated in Table 7-3, were intended




to ieduce the expected rates of consumption of the primary reactants, as those




rates seemed substantially too high in runs 1 and 2.  With the new choices, the




values predicted for ozone, nitrogen dioxide and nitric oxide were all within




5 pphm of the observed values at the Pasadena air monitoring station at the




time of closest approach of the trajectory to that station.  These validating




points are also shown in Figure 7-3.  (Validation data for the hydrocarbon




concentration ar«; not available.)
                                      7-23

-------
                                          RUN 3
              60                120
                    MINUTES
180
Figure 7-3.  CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS VS SIMULATED
             TIME LAPSE, RUNS 1 AND 3.
                    7-24

-------
              vo

       O   CO  "ch
       zoo
          o  a
O
in
                ~T
                 o


•
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1.
I
1
t
1
1
T
j
|

x'j
X I
^ 1
jv""' i
/
/
^--r""
o
-o

f
1
1
co


1
fl
+
!
1
1
4




o
CM





-g
(
1
t


O
- CM



. o
vo
Ml
/ II

t
	 «-
- <—»
                                                                                           to
                                                                                           LU
                                                                                           H-


                                                                                           K-t
                                                                                           z:
O
CM
                                                                                                    w
                                                                                                    CO
                                                 w
                                                 w

                                                 2
                                                 o
                                                 g
                                                 u
                                                 o
                                                 §
                                                 CJ
                                                                                                    8
                                                                                                     3
                                                                                                     60
                                                                                                    •H
                                            NOIlVaiN33NOD
                                               7-25

-------
E.  APPLICATION OF THE MODEL

          After optimum operation and adequate validation and sensitivity

analyses have been achieved, the model will be useful in many ways for application

to practical problems in the control of air quality.  Thus, for regions where

weather variables and air quality are well documented, the model will predict

the effect on air quality of postulated trends in emissions rates, either

uniform or geographically biased.  With air quality models based on standard

types of diffusion equations, typical contaminant concentrations tend to

increase proportionally to increases in emission rates.  However, with the

secondary contaminants generated as a result of photochemical reactions in

the atmosphere, no such relation holds, nor is any simple relation adequate

for describing the changes effected.

          Similarly, an adequately validated model will predict the air

quality effects of proposed new stationary sources of oxides of nitrogen or

hydrocarbons.

          For regions without air monitoring data, but with good information

about weather and emissions, the model can be used to produce detailed
                                                             •
estimates of air quality. For regions with only a single air monitoring station,

or with an inadequate number of stations, the model will provide estimates

of the variation of air quality with location within  the region.

          Even if no detailed information regarding emissions and weather

exists for the region of interest, potentials for serious photcchealca, -i.r

pollution can be projected from various reasonable assumptions which can be

readily tested by application of the computer model.


                                      7-26

-------
          A preliminary study of the application of the model to a control




strategy exercise was conducted.  In this study the existing weather for




September 30, 1969, total vehicle mileage and distribution of vehicle mileage




were maintained, but the emission rates for hydrocarbons (propylene) and NO




were modified by 6 sets of relative factors, as follows:
RUN
NO
HC
1
1
.25
2
1
.05
3
.5
.25
4
.5
.05
5
.1
.25
6
.1
.05
          Each set represents a  conceivable control strategy  test.  The  objective




of  the  tests  is  to determine which  combination of emission  factor  reductions




(HC and NO) best minimize  contaminant  concentrations, particularly ozone.




Results of  these runs are  presented in Table 7-5 in terms of  calculated  con-




centrations of the contaminants  (nitrogen  dioxide, nitric oxide, ozone and




hydrocarbons) at the terminus of the trajectory, near Pasadena, and in




terms of  the  maximum calculated  concentrations of the contaminants (which




may be  found  at  other points of  the trajectory.) Also listed  is the "fixed



oxygen",  a  measure of the1  cumulative degree of reaction  at  the end of  the




trajectory.



          From Table 7-4 it will be noted  that hourly average tonr-;.: ^rations




observed  in Pasadena for 1500 to 1600, the hour  of  the  trajectory  approach,




were  5  pphm N0_, 1 pphm NO, and  15  pphm oxidant, with no reading on hydrocarbons.
                                      7-27

-------
                                 Table 7-5


     Calculated Photochemical Contaminant Concentrations for Lennox-Pasadena
                    Trajectory,  with Varied Emissions Input
Run Number
Initial NO, pphm
Initial HC, pphmc
Input NO, relative
Input HC, relative
NO., pphm: Pasadena
maximum
NO, pphm: Pasadena
maximum
0-, pphm: Pasadena
maximum
HC, pphm: Pasadena
maximum
Fixed oxygen, pphm
oa
7
50
1
1
1
21
0
7
21
21
42
81
155
1
8
12.5
1
0.25
38
A6
5
19
7
7
18
27
45
2
8
2.5
1
0,05
39
39
18
37
2
3
4
6
15
3
4
12.5
0.5
0.25
20
28
2
7
9
9
18
28
37
4
4
2.5
0.5
0.05
26
26
10
18
2
4
4
5
10
5
0.3
12.5
0.1
0.25
6
(18)b
1
3
11
11
17
26
34
6
0.8
2.5
0.1
0.05
14
(18)b
3
5
4
5
4
6
7
a.  Run 0 is the reference run, Table 7-4.

b.  Maxima of 18 pphm NO- occurred at the starting point of the trajfr.tory

    because the assumed initial value wa~ 18.

c.  "HC" is assumed as propylene in the mechanism used.

d.  Factors applied to emissions input in the reference run.
                                     7-28

-------
For the reference run, the corresponding calculated values were 1 pphm



NO,,, zero NO, and 21 pphm ozone.  From the results in Table 7-5, it is clear




that computed values of NO. for Pasadena are drastically increased by reducing




the assumed hydrocarbon input without altering the oxides of nitrogen inputs




(cf. Runs 1 and 2), while simultaneously the calculated values for NO are




increased, and those for ozone and hydrocarbons strongly reduced.  At lower




input levels of nitric oxide, the same trends are evident (Runs A vs 3,




and 6 vs 5), although not to as great an extent.  Only in Run 5, with NO




input one-tenth and hydrocarbon one fourth of that in the reference run, do the




calculated values of NO., NO and oxidant in Pasadena approach the observed




values:  NO,, 6/5, NO 1/1, Ox 11/15.  (pphm observed/pphm calculated).




          Comparison of the calculated contaminant levels for Pasadena with




the calculated maximum contaminant levels shows that the calculated ozone level




at the Pasadena terminus was at the maximum for all runs with hydrocarbon




input 0.25 of that in the reference run, but was less than the maximum for




those runs with hydrocarbon 0.1.  On the other hand, calculated N0? maxima




occurred at the Pasadena terminus only for runs 2 and 4, with hydrocarbon




input 0.1.  Thus the model, with its assumed chemical mechanism, predicts




that hydrocarbon control in the Los Angeles Region would have opposite effects



on ozone and oxides of nitrogen as measured in Pasadena, at least for conditions




like those of September 30, 1969.




          Further exploration of the implications of these results may be




facilitated by the presentation given in Table 7-6.  Here the contaminant levels
                                      7-29

-------
                                  Table 7-6
      Calculated Contaminant Levels  from Simulation Runs with Modified
                  Emissions Input, Arranged for Easy Comparison     .
Pattern (Run No.):
                   Relative

                         NO

                      Input
Nitrogen Dioxide, pphm

   at Pasadena

   1    38    39

        20    26

         6    14


Nitric Oxide, pphm

   at Pasadena

   0     5    18

         2    10

         1     3

Ozone, pphm

   at Pasadena

   21    7      2

         9      2

        11      4
                                        Relative HC Input

1.0
0.5
0.1
1.00
oa


0.25
1
3
5
0.05
2
4
6
Trajectory maximum

21    46    39

      28    26

     (18)  (18)b
Trajectory maximum

  7   19    37

       7    18

       3     5



Trajectory maximum

 21    7     3

       9     4

      11     5
                                      7-30

-------
                                  Table 7-6 (Continued)



Hydrocarbons, pphm




   at Pasadena                            Trajectory maximum




42      18       4                        81    27     6




        18       4                              28     5




        17       4                              26     6
a.  Run 0 is the reference run (Table 7-3)




b.  Maxima of 18 pphm NO,, occurred at the beginning of the trajectory because




    of constant assumed initial value.
                                      7-31

-------
taken from Table 7-4 and 7-5 are arranged in a pattern such that, for each




contaminant, the values predicted on reducing hydrocarbons at constant NO



input are entered across rows, the the values predicted on reducing NO at



constant hydrocarbon input are entered down columns.  Within the range tested,



the principal implications of the model with the assumed chemical reaction



mechanism appear to be the following:



     1.  Decreasing hydrocarbon input should cause decreases in ozone and



hydrocarbon levels at Pasadena, with increases in nitric oxide and nitrogen



dioxide levels.



     2.  As to the maximum contaminant levels at points between Lennox and



Pasadena, decreasing hydrocarbon input should cause first an increase, then



a decrease for nitrogen dioxide.  For the other contaminants, the maximum



levels would behave in generally the same way as the Pasadena levels.



     3.  Decreasing nitric oxide input should cause decreases in nitric oxide



and nitrogen dioxide levels at Pasadena, but an increase in ozone levels.



Hydrocarbon levels would be little affected.



     4.  Decreasing nitric oxide input should have effects on maximum



contaminant levels similar to those described for Pasadena levels.



          The application of the Reactive Pollution Simulation model



requires an orientation to the modeling of air pollution that differs con-



siderably from the diffusion model approach.  The latter provides for a



capability to deal with multiple point, line or area sources, multiple



receptor points, and to display averages  of pollutant concentrations on a



grid system which represent seasonal or annual time periods of interest.
                                     7-32

-------
           The diffusion approach lends itself to a gross picture of relative




pollution levels over a geographic region of interest.  It has the advantage




of displaying values simultaneously.  It has the disadvantage of poor accuracy,




of not being able to dynamically simulate meteorological conditions, reactive




contaminants or episode conditions.




           The Reactive Model, on the other hand, is an episode model and simulates




conditions as they occur on a diurnal basis and outputs "instantaneous" concen-




trations along a calculated air parcel trajectory.




           In general the differences in the two approaches can be seen in




terms of isopleth construction (lines of equal concentration of a single




contaminant), and trajectory plots which output many contaminant concentrations




for an unlimited number of receptor points along the trajectory.  The contaminant




concentrations are governed by time and position and therefore are not simultaneous.




The values output are "quasi-instantaneous" in character, i.e., the rates of




change of the concentrations of contaminants are comparatively small over any




5-minute interval.  Thus model calculated values can be reasonably compared with




5-minute average observations.  For validation purposes, these can be considered




to fall with the range of observed hourly value observations.



           Given these characteristics, the use of this model for analysis of




seasonal, annual and other long term conditions based on the distribution




of receptor points throughout the air quality region of interest requires the




following approach:
                                      7-33

-------
    1.  Multiple Receptor Points - The determination of air quality at



multiple receptor points (other than those output along a single trajectory)



requires the use of a backward trajectory plotting technique.  Points are



selected by coordinate position and time.  A backward trajectory is plotted



to determine the trajectory start point.  The trajectory is then run forward



with kinetics routine to establish the air quality at the desired receptor



point.  Air quality at an unlimited number of receptor points can be so calculated.



The data generated can be used as a basis for isopleth plotting.




    2.  Representative Air Quality - The depiction of representative conditions



(monthly, seasonal, annual time periods) must be arrived at through characteri-



zation of meteorological conditions which represent days which are typical of



the time periods of interest for the given air quality region under study.



This requires that meteorological data of the given region be statistically



characterized particularly in terms of wind speed, direction, mixing height and



other meteorological and environmental parameters of interest.  These can be



grouped into days which are conducive to acute, moderate and light episode



potentials.  Meteorological data describing these representative days can be



input to the model.



    3.  Artificial Trajectories and Multiple Trajectories - Where complete



knowledge of the wind regime of a region is available, trajectories can be



artificially plotted from streamline or other summary data and corresponding



wind data can be assigned to the coordinate points.  This tecLai.-;-^ has <.'.,c



advantage of hypothesizing and testing meteorological conditions which



maximize the build-up of contaminants to produce acute episodes.  Also this
                                      7-34

-------
technique provides the capability of standardizing sets of representative
                                                   [
meteorological conditions for mass-testing many urban regions for their
                                                   i ,
reactive pollution potentials, and for testing a variety of urban-source-

configurations and emission rates.

    4.  Non-Photochemical Contaminants - The model readily handles non-reactive

contaminants—CO, SCL, particulates.  The model can operate either with all
                                                   i
contaminants simultaneously—photochemical and non-photochemical—or the chemical
                                                   i
kinetics mechanism can be suppressed in order to operate with only non-reactive
                                                   i
contaminants.                                       \
                                       7-35

-------
                                 APPENDIX I

                       RESULTS OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
I.  INDIVIDUAL LOS ANGELES SCAN STATIONS

    A.  ANAHEIM
                                                 I
        1.  Rank Order Analysis                  I

            The peak instantaneous value of A3 pphm for total oxidant concen-
tration was recorded on August 28, 1967 during the 13th hour.  On 113 occasions
the daily instantaneous peak reached a value of 14 pphm or greater.  The 14th
is the modal hour of occurrence of peak oxidant concentration with 27 out of
113 such events taking place in that hour.  Eighty-five percent of all peak
instantaneous values occur between the llth and 14th hour.  October is the modal
month of peak instantaneous oxidant levels with 20 events out of a total of
113.  During the 9th hour on August 28, 1967 a peak instantaneous value of
17 pphm of N0_ was recorded.  This is the 12th highest reading in the N0»
instantaneous daily peak population.
                                                 j
        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
is strongly skewed to the left with a mean of 3.45 pphm, a standard deviation
of 3.93 pphm and a mode of 1 pphm.  More than 96 percent of the hourly average
oxidant concentration readings fall below 14 pphm.  The value 14 pphm is 2.68
sample standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The largest correlation of .30 among dependent and independent
variables was found to be between the total oxidant concentration logarithmic
variable and the N02 logarithmic variable.  The next correlation (in absolute
value) of -.28 was lor mixing height.  In a 7-variable regression (CO, NO ,
mixing height, wind speed, temperature, relative humidity and sky cover) a
standard error of estimate of .102 and a shrunken correlation coefficient of
.55 were attained at the 99.9-percent level of confidence.  From the above
standard error of estimate the following 95 percent relative error confidence
interval was computed:

                                        ) £ (CXR) 1 1.6 (OXM)
                                      1-1

-------
        4.  Auto and Cross-Correlation Analysis (August 26 to August 30)

            As with the CAMP cities it can be seen that during a string of high
oxidant days total oxidant is highly sequentially correlated.  CO and N02 and
NO and total hydrocarbons auto-correlation functions are, in general, quite
similar.  Meteorological variable auto-correlation functions are included for
comparison.  In the cross-correlation analysis the highest cross-correlation
calculated between oxidant and other photochemical contaminants was -.47 at
lag 0 for NO.  Among the meteorological variables, there was a cross-correlation
of .84 at a lag of 3 hours for total oxidant concentration versus wind speed.
This result seems to be clearly indicative of a wind-transport phenomenon.
Total oxidant was well cross correlated positively (.78 at lag 1) with temperature
and fairly cross correlated with mixing height negatively (-.45 at lag 1).

    B.  AZUSA

        !•  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous observed concentration of 73 pphm was recorded
on August 30, 1967 during the 12th hour.  On 204 days a peak instantaneous value
of 14 pphm or greater was recorded.  The 14th hour is the modal peak oxidant
hour with 57 out of 204 peaks taking place in that hour.  87.5 percent of all
peaks are attained between the 12th and 15th hours.  August is the modal month
of peak oxidant level occurrence with 34 incidents out of 204.

            On the highest peak oxidant day of the year the peak instantaneous
NO  reached its 15th highest recorded value of 15 pphm during the 8th hour.

        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution for average hourly oxidant concentrations
is left skewed with sample mean of 5.4 pphm, standard deviation of 7.12 pphm
and modal value of 1.00 pphm, with 2833 out of total population of 8040 read-
ings recorded at this level.  The value 14 pphm exceeds 89.99 percent of
population values and is 1.23 standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            In a sample of 204 points the lag of the maximum total oxidant
concentration had the highest correlation of .6 with the 3-hour logarithmic
average of CO concentration.  This was followed by correlation of -.55 and .54
with mixing height and temperature.  A 7-variable subset (CO, mixing h>inht,
wind speed, pressure, temperature, relative humidity and total a*y cover)
yielded a regression significant at ':he 9S percent level of confidence, with a
standard error of estimate of .092 and a shrunken multiple correlation coefficient
of .81.  The standard error of estimate gives &8 the corresponding 95-percent
confidence relative error band:
                                      1-2

-------
                                 •65<°V 1

        4-  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis(August 26 toAugust 30)
                                                  I
            Characteristically, during episodic lag sequences total oxidant is
very highly sequentially correlated.  The corresponding auto-correlation
function takes on values of .87, .65, .42, etc., through lags 1, 2, and 3.
In this particular case it is noted that the mixing height auto-correlation
function is similar to that of total oxidant.  Generally, most pollutant and
meteorological auto-correlation functions indicate a temporal persistence.
The exceptions here are CO, NO, and N0?.  In the cross-correlation analysis a
very high cross-correlation of .86 between total oxidant concentration and wind
speed is exhibited at a lag of 2 hours, with significant cross-correlation
values down to a lag of 5 hours.  This result is a|very strong indication
of the existence of a wind transport phenomenon.

    C.  BURBANK

        1.  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous oxidant concentration of 51 pphm was attained
on July 21, 1967 during the 12th hour.  On 182 occasions the peak instantaneous
recorded concentration equaled or exceeded 14 pphm.   The modal hour of peak
oxidant occurrence is the 12th hour, with 61 out of 182 peak oxidant incidences
in that hour.  Ninety percent of all peaks are observed between hours 11 and
14 inclusive.  July and August are the modal months of peak oxidant cocurrence,
being together responsible for 72 out of 182 such episodes.  On July 21, 1967
the 9th highest instantaneous peak level of 42 pphm of NO. concentration was
recorded during the 8th hour.

        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of 7992 hourly average total oxidant
concentrations is skewed to the left with mean of 4.64 pphm, standard deviation
of 6.17 pphm and mode of 1.00 pphm.  Ninety percent of all observed concentra-
tions are exceeded by 14 pphm.  The value 14 pphm is 1.52 sample standard
deviations from the sample mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The total oxidant logarithmic variable was most highly correlated
with the CO logarithmic average with corresponding correlation coefficient of
.48, with the logarithmic s.emperature correlation at .47, ana the logarithmic
mixing height at -.40.  A 3-variahIe sucsec (CO, mixing height, and temperature)
gave regression results significant at the 99 percent level (99.999	9
percent) with a corresponding standard error of estimate of .11 and a shrunken
                                     1-3

-------
multiple correlation coefficient of .62.  The above standard error of estimate
produces the following 95-percent confidence band for the oxidant concentration,
(OX_), predicted from the regression equation.

                                 .6(03^) <. (OX^ i 1.66(03^)

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis, (July 18 to July 22)

            All contaminant (CO, NO, N02, NO , and total oxidant) auto-correlation
functions exhibited the persistence phenomena previously described for Azusa.
Total oxidant auto-correlation had the highest lag 1 value at .93, while total
oxides of nitrogen had persistently high auto-correlations ranging from .90
at lag 1 down to .51 at lag 4.  The highest cross-correlation of total oxidant
with another photochemical pollutant was -.52 at lag 5 with NO.  Cross-cor-
relations of total oxidant with the meteorological variables was characterized
by a cross-correlation of .88 for temperature at a 1-hour lag and .74 for wind
speed at a 4-hour lag—again indicative of wind transport.

    D.  DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES

        !•  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous oxidant concentration of 45 pphm was recorded
on October 18, 1967 in the 13th hour.  On 144 days peak levels of 14 pphm or
more were attained.  The llth hour is the modal episode hour with 39 out of
144 such events occurring in the interval between 11:00 A.M. and 12 noon.
Ninety-two percent of all peak oxidant events take place between the hours of
11 and 14, inclusive.  August is the modal month of high oxidant events, with
27 out of 144.  On October 18, 1967 during the 23rd hour a peak instantaneous
concentration of 41 pphm of N02 was recorded.  This was the llth highest peak
instantaneous value.

        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The total hourly average oxidant concentration population of 8202
observations has the characteristic left skewedness with sample mean 3.34 pphm,
standard deviation 4.15 pphm and modal v :lue of 1.00 pphm.  Ninety-six percent
of the population values are exceeded by 14 pphm.  This latter value is 2.57
sample standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The highest correlation in a sample of 144 between cu.pendent and
independent variables was .30 for ths 3-houk* logarithmic average of NO..  A
6-variable subset (CO, NO, NO., pressure, relative humidity and sky cover)
yielded significant regression results with corresponding standard error of
                                      1-4

-------
estimate at .098 and shrunken multiple correlation coefficient of .55.  From
the above standard error of estimate is computed the following 95 percent confi-
dence interval:

                                 •6*<°*M> 1 (°V 1 1-57(0^)

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis, (October 10 to October 20)

            The auto-correlation functions for N0« and total hydrocarbons followed
by total oxidant represented the strongest "persistence" phenomena.  Again
total oxidant was the most strongly serially correlated time series with an
auto-correlation value of .87 at lag 1, 64 at lag 2, etc.

            There was no striking cross-correlatidn between total oxidant and
either the other photochemical contaminants or meteorological variables; -.41
with NO concentration at a lag of 2 hours, -.46 with mixing height at lag 0
and .5 wind deviation at lag 3.  There was no significant indication of trans-
port, the wind speed cross-correlation taking on a maximum value of .2 at lag
0.                             '                   !

    E.  LA HABRA

        1.  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous concentration of 31 pphm was recorded on
October 11, 1967 during the 14th hour.  On 54 recorded occasions a peak instan-
taneous total oxidant concentration of 14 pphm or more was reached.  The 13th
hour is the modal oxidant episode hour, with 13 out of 54 occurrences of high
oxidant levels (>_ 14 pphm) recorded in that hour.  Forty-eight out of 54 high
oxidant events occurred from the 12th to the 15th hours, inclusive.  October
is the modal month of high oxidant.  The 6th largest peak instantaneous NO.
concentration of 24 pphm was observed during the 16th hour on October 11, 1967.

        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The sample population of 1350 total oxidant concentration was left
skewed with mean 2.84 pphm standard deviation 3.95 pphm and mode 0.00 pphm.
Over 97 percent of the population values were less than 14 pphm.  The value 14
pphm lies 2.82 standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            In a small sample  size of 20, limited by missing data, tbe highest
correlation (in absolute value) between dependent variable aux independent
variables was -.5 for the 3-hour logarithmic average of mixing height.  The
correlation with the 3-hour logarithmic average of sky cover was .3.  A 3-
variable regression (mixing height, relative humidity, sky cover) gave results
                                      1-5

-------
significant to the 10th decimal place with standard error of estimate .019
and shrunken multiple correlation coefficient .99.  The 95 percent confidence
interval for the regression formula predicting total oxidant (OX_) is given
by:
                                          1 (OXR) 1 1.04 (OXM),
where it is recalled that (OX.) is the observed value of total oxidant concen-
tration.  These results are ox little importance because of the small sample
size.
            In the auto- and cross-correlation analysis results similar to those
previosuly discussed for SCAM stations are generally obtained:  high serial
correlation of total oxidant and other contaminant concentration, fairly high
cross-correlation of oxidant concentration with wind speed indicative of trans-
port, etc.  There is a high cross-correlation of .85 at a lag of 1 hour for
temperature.  There is a fairly high temporally persistent cross-correlation
for sky cover.  Since the number of samples in the cross-correlation analysis
is about six times greater, higher confidence may be placed in the results of
the auto- and cross-correlations, than in those for correlation and regression.

    F.  PASADENA

        !•  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous concentration of 53 pphm of total oxidant
was recorded on August 29, 1967.  On 189 occasions daily peak values equaled or
exceeded 14 pphm.  The modal hour of peak instantaneous total oxidant concen-
tration was 13, with 52 12th hour incidences out of 189 total.  Ninety percent
of all peak total oxidant concentrations occurred between the 12th and 14th
hours, inclusive.  July was the modal month for peak oxidant levels with 31
out of 189.  On August 29, 1967 during the 7th hour a peak instantaneous NO.
concentration of 13 pphm was attained.  This was the 21st highest level recorded.

        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The sample population of 821^ observations of total oxidant hourly
average concentrations is skewed toward 0 ipnm with sample mean at 4.57, sample
standard deviation of 5.92 and modal value of 1.00 pphm.  Ninety percent of the
population values are less than 14 pphm.  The value 14 falls 1.60 standard
deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The highest correlation (in absolute value) of -.59 corresponded to
the mixing height logarithmic average.  This was followed by the value .5 for
the CO logarithmic average.  An 8-variable subset (CO, NO, mixing height, wind
                                     1-6

-------
 speed,  pressure,  temperature,  relative humidity and sky cover)  yielded a regres-
 sion with a standard error of  estimate of .085 and a shrunken multiple correlation
 coefficient of .78.   The above standard error of estimate translates itself
 into the following 95-percent  confidence band:

                                  .68(0)^) <_ (OXj^) i 1.48 (OXM)

         A.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

             All contaminant concentrations auto-correlation functions excepting
 total oxidant exhibited a marked decrease in the aforementioned persistence
 phenomenon.  The subsequent cross-correlation analysis exhibited little serial
 cros.s-correlation between total oxidant concentration and the other pollutaats,
 the largest in magnitude being -.43 for total hydrocarbons at lag 3.  There
 was, however, good cross-correlation between total oxidant concentration and
 some of the meteorological pollutants:  -.48 for mixing height  at lag 2, .79
 for temperature at lag 2, and  .74 for wind speed at lag 3.

II.  INDIVIDUAL CAMP CITIES                       i

     A.   CHICAGO                                  \

         1.  Rank Order Analysis

             The peak instantaneous level of total! oxidant concentration of 16
 pphm was reached on September  8, 1967 in the 12th hour.  On 58  days a peak instan-
 taneous concentration value of 7 pphm or more was measured.  The hour in which
 the peak level occurred has a  bimodal frequency distribution with primary mode
 at hour 15 and secondary mode  at hour 13.  Fifty-seven percent  of all peak
 instantaneous total oxidant recordings fall between the hours of 12 and 16.
 June is the modal month of occurrence of high total oxidant levels, with 11
 of 58 occurrences of oxidant levels of 7 or more pphm occurring in that month.

             On September 8, 1967 at hour 7 an NO- concentration of 52 pphm
 was observed.  This peak value of N0? concentration was the.second highest
 measurement of the year, exceeded only by peak level of 63 pphm recorded on
 September 6, 1967 during the 6th hour.

         2.  Frequency Distributions and Sample Statistics

             The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
 is strongly skewed to the left with mean of 2.93 pphm, modal value of 3 pphm
 and standard deviation of 2.02 pphm.  In a total sample popul *itiou ^" 5597
 hourly average total oxidant observations, 95 percent of the observed values
 were less than 7 pphm.  This value of 7 pphm is 2.04 standard deviations from
 the mean.
                                      1-7

-------
        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            A correlation analysis based on a restriction of the sample space
to the 58 points where (OX..) >_ 7 reveals:

              •  The highest correlation between dependent and independent
                 variable is .389, corresponding to total hydrocarbon concen-
                 tration.

              «  The next highest correlation of .326 corresponds to N02
                 concentration .

              •  The highest correlation in absolute value among the dependent
                 variables and those corresponding to independent meteorological
                 variables is -.261, associated with wind speed.

            Utilizing information computed from the correlation analysis a
regression analysis was carried out with the following results:

              •  The results of the regression were significant at the 99-
                 percent level of confidence.

              •  The standard error of estimate for the complete regression
                 was .088.  This can be translated to mean that, with approx-
                 imately 95-percent confidence, the regression estimate (OX_)
                 compiled by substituting observed values of the independent
                 variable in the regression equation and taking the antilog
                 of the result will satisfy:
where (OX.) is the observed peak hourly average total oxidant concentration.

              •  A smaller number of Independent variables (NO, N02> total HC,
                 temperature, and total sky cover) yields the smallest standard
                 error of estimate (.0861) and largest shrunken multiple
                 correlation coefficient  (.523).

            4.   Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

                 An auto-correlation analysis of 5 lags over a maximum of 96
possible hourly average rankings for four photochemical pollutants was carried
out.  The particular time sequence (June 2 to June 5) involved ?- che ; i  /Lysis
was selected on the basis of high oxidant levels.  Scanning the computer output
it can be seen that:
                                     1-8

-------
              •  The auto-correlation functions of NO and total HC are very
                 similar.

              •  The auto-correlation functions of NO. and OX match closely.
                                                   I
              •  There is fairly good correlation df approximately .7 between
                 observed successive hourly values of NO and HC concentrations
                 and the auto-correlation functions drop sharply for higher lags.

              •  There is very good correlation of approximately .9 between
                 successive hourly values of NO. and OX.  The auto-correlation
                 functions drop gradually for higher lags.

            The results of subsequent cross-correlations analysis were incon-
clusive.  The highest (in absolute value) cross-correlation measured was .69
at lag zero for NO versus total HC.  This result was in agreement with the
correlation of .79 between the 3-hour logarithmic averages as observed in the
correlation study.

    b.  CINCINNATI

        1.  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous level of total Oxidant concentration of
19 pphm was reached on July 31, 1967 in the 13th hour.  On 68 days a peak
instantaneous concentration value of 7 pphm or more was measured.  The hour
in which the peak occurred has a unimodal frequency distribution with a modal
value at 15 pphm.  Sixty-six percent of all peak observed instantaneous values
fall between the hours of 12 and 16.  September is the modal month of occurrence
of h.gh total oxidant levels, with 15 out of 68 occurrences of observed high
oxidant levels.

        2.  Frequency Distributions and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
is strongly skewed to the left with mean of 3.14 pphm and standard deviation
2.24 pphm.  Over 94 percent of the observed sample population of 5310 hourly
average total oxidant concentrations values are less than 7 pphm.  This value
of 7 pphm is 1.72 standard deviations from the mean of 3.14.

        3*  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The correlation analysis on samples for which max.--.uffl hc^t^y average
oxidant levelh were greater than or eqnrl to 7 was inconclusive.  The highest
correlation in absolute value was -.214 between oxidant and relative humidity.
                                     1-9

-------
            The results of the subsequent full 10-variable regression analysis
(9 independent variables) were significant at the 92-percent level of confidence.
The best predictive results were obtained with a 5 independent variable subset
(CO, NO, wind speed, temperature, relative humidity) regression.  This regression
was significant at the 99-percent level with a corresponding standard error of
estimat of .097 and a shrunken multiple correlation coefficient of .40.  Analogous
to our resulcs for Chicago, this "best" standard error of estimate yields, with
about 95-percent confidence:

                                 .61(02^) <. (OJ^) <_ 1.63(0^),

where (OX_) is predicted from the regression equation and (03O is the correspond-
ing observed peak hourly average total oxidant concentration taken from the
restricted population of values greater than or equal to 7 pphm.

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

            In the auto-correlation analysis a general similarity to the Chicago
case can be observed, i.e.,

              •  The shapes of the NO and total HC auto-correlation curves agree
                 fairly well.

              *  The same findings apply to NO. and total OX.

              •  Successive hour-to-hour correlations are high, with successive
                 total oxidant values very highly correlated.

            As for the cross-correlation analysis, it can be seen that total
OX concentration is fairly negatively correlated with present and previous
total hydrocarbons concentration.  This last result seems, at first glance, to
contradict the results of the correlation study.  It must be remembered, however,
that in that study logarithmic relationships were under investigation.

    C.  DENVER

        1.  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous level of total oxidant concentration of
20 pphm was recorded on August 14, 1967 during the 10th hour.  On 48 days a peak
oxidant value of 7 pphm or more was observed.  The hour of peak instantaneous
oxidant occurrence has a blmodal distribution with primary mode between 9 and
13.  August is the modal month of occurrence for high oxidant levels, with 24
percent of such occurrences of peak vsluas greater than or equal to 7 pphm.
                                     1-10

-------
        2.  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            Consonant with results from Chicago and Cincinnati the frequency
distribution of total OX concentration is strongly skewed to the left with mean
of 2.83 pphm, a standard deviation of 2.03 pphm and a modal value of 2 pphm.
The value 7 pphm exceeds 97 percent of the population of 36-7 values and is
2.06 sample standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The "best" correlations of the dependent variable were with the
3-hour logarithmic averages of NO and temperature.  These were -.31 and .27,
respectively.  However, fairly good results were obtained in the regression study.
A subset of 5 independent variables corresponding to NO, nonmethane HC, wind
speed, temperature and total sky cover yielded a standard error of estimate of
.089 and a shrunken multiple correlation coefficient of .66 at the 99.9-percent
level of confidence.  These figures correspond to the 95-percent confidence
interval:

                                 •67<°V 1 (O^R) - lt5 <0V

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

            Included in the auto-correlation analysis for comparison purposes
are auto-correlations of three meteorological Variables, wind speed, temperature,
and relative humidity.  As previously seen, among the photochemical contaminants
total oxidant concentration is best correlated time-sequentially.

            In the cross-correlation analysis a high negative correlation of
-.82 is seen between present total oxidant levels and levels of N0_ 1 hour
previously.  Noting the small number of observations in the N02 sample, there
is justifiably little confidence in this figure.

    D.  PHILADELPHIA

        !•  Rank Order Analysis

            The maximum instantaneous value of total oxidant concentration of
17 pphm was attained on June 24, 1967 during the 16th hour.  On 81 days a peak
value of 7 pphm or greater was observed.  The hour of peak occurrence has a
unimodal frequency distribution with mode between 11 and 12.  Fifty-five percent
of all peak instantaneous oxidant concentration were recorded between the hours
of 11 and 15.  July is the modal month of incidence of hi^'.i total aidant
concentration:  20 out of the total of 81 incidents were recorded in that month.
                                     1-11

-------
        2-  Frequency Distributions and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
is strongly left skewed with a mean of 2.63 pphm, mode of 2 pphm and standard
deviation of 2.15 pphm.  In a total sample population of 6134 observations,
94.46 percent of the population values were less than 7 pphm.  The value
7 pphm is 2.00 sample standard deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The highest correlation between dependent and independent variables
of .25 was attained for N0_.  This was followed by a value of .14 correaponding
to the temperature variable.  A subset of 8 variables (CO, NO, NO., nonmethane
HC, wind speed, pressure, temperature and sky cover) yielded the Best standard
error of estimate of .095 and shrunken multiple correlation coefficient of .36.
From this standard error of estimate the following 95-percent confidence level
is derived:

                                 .645(03^) <. (OXR) <. 1.55(0^)

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

            Case 1 (June 23 to June 25)

            In this auto-correlation analysis it is seen that total oxidant
and temperature auto-correlation functions are quite close in structure.  Both
exhibit very high correlations of over .9 at lag 0, .8 at a lag of 1 hour and
thereafter dropping off slowly through values of approximately .8 for lag
2, .65 for lag 3, etc.

            Case 2 (June 15 to June 18)

            Once again it is noted that the hour-to-hour correlation of oxidant
remains high for lags of 1 and 2 hours.  Here the resemblance between the
oxidant and temperature auto-correlation functions diminishes as the lag number
grows.

            Case 3 (August 26 to August 30)

            Here the total oxidant correlation curve falls rather more rapidly
than in the previous cases.  The higher sample numbers indicate that these
results may be viewed with somewhat higher confidence.

            In the Case 3 cross-conciatior; analysis, the case with the highest
sample numbers involved in computation of the cross-correlation, it can be
observed that total oxidant is fairly well correlated (negatively) with present
                                     1-12

-------
and preceding hourly values of NO and positively correlated with wind .sp-eed.
This latter result may be indicative of contaminant transport phenomena.

    li.  ST. LOUIS

        !•  Rank Ord.; r_ Analysis

            The highest instantaneous value of total oxidant concentration of
20 pphm was measured on June 30, 1967 during the 14th hour.  On 119 days a
peak value of 7 pphm or greater was measured.  This hour of peak occurrence
has a bimodal frequency distribution.  The primary mode is at hour 12 with
22 occurrences.  Fifty percent of all peak instantaneous averages occur between
the hours of 10 and 15.  July is the modal month of high oxidant levels with
24 and 119 or 20.2 percent of such recordings being recorded in July.  It can
be observed that a broad interval of months starting in April and ending in
October contain almost 75 percent of the high oxidant days.

        2•  Frequency Distribution and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
is M rongiy left skewed with a mean of 3.44 pphm, mode of 2 pphm and a sample
standard deviation of 2.29 pphm.  In a total sample population, 94 percent of
the values are less than 7 pphm.  The value 7 pphm is 1.55 sample standard
deviations from the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            Case 1

            The highest correlation in absolute value of -.46 in a sample of
39 corresponded to total oxidant and wind speed.   The next highest value of
-.26 was attained for wind speed.  A subset of A variables (CO, NO, N0£ and
wind speed) yielded a regression significant at the 99.6-percent level in which
the standard error of estimate was .062 and the shrunken multiple correlation
coefficient was .54.  Corresponding to the above sample standard error of
estimate, the following 95 percent confidence interval was computed:

                                 (.7500XM) <_ (OXR) £ 1.33 (03^)

            This inequality is equivalent to saying that with probability of
approximately .95 the relative err^r in predicting oxidant concentration from
the regression formula will 2Le between -.25 and +.33.
                                     1-13

-------
            Case 2

            The sample of Case 1 was a 39 point subset of Case 2.  In Case 2
there are 119 sample points corresponding to the 119 days of peak oxidant
levels.  For this case, the highest dependent-independent variable correlation
of -.29 was between those corresponding to oxidant and wind speed.  The next
highest, .23, corresponded to N0_.  In the regression study a 4-variable
subset (NO, NO., wind speed, and total sky cover) yielded a regression significant
at the 99.40-percent level with a standard error of estimate of 0.92 and
shrunken multiple correlation coefficient of .36.  Corresponding to the above
standard error of estimate is the 95-percent regression confidence interval:

                                 .65(0^) <_ (OXj^) <_ 1.53(0]^)

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis (June 29 to July 2)

            For lag numbers 0 through 5 based on samples of 89, 84, 82, 81,
and 80, respectively, the corresponding auto-correlation of oxidants were 1, .91,
.76, .58, .41, and .27.  Here again is an example of the strong linear serial
dependence of total oxidant concentrations.

            The highest cross-correlation obtained was .54 between hourly average
total oxidant concentration and NO- concentration 5 hours earlier.

    F.  WASHINGTON

        1.  Rank Order Analysis

            The peak instantaneous value of 25 pphm for total oxidant was
recorded on November 27, 1967 during the first hour.  This also corresponds
to the time of occurrence of the third highest instantaneous N0« level of
76 pphm.  Obviously, the time of this particular event precludes an association
with any photochemical mechanism.  Further, the underlying data quality
becomes highly suspect.  On 79 days a peak instantaneous level of 7 pphm or
greater was observed.  The hour of peak occurrence has a bimodal shape with a
questionably small tertiary mode at 23.  The primary mode is at 12.  The
secondary mode is at 15.  Seventy-two percent of all instantaneous total oxidant
peak values occur between the 12th and t,.r> 16th hours, inclusive.  July is the
modal month of peak oxidant occurrence, with 18 out of 79 such occurrences
taking place in that month.

        2.  Frequency Distributions and Sample Statistics

            The frequency distribution of hourly average oxidant concentrations
is skewed to the left with a mean 01 2.57 pphia, a mode of 2 pphm and a
standard deviation of 2.30 pphm.  In a total sample of 7080, 94 percent of
the recorded values are less than 7 pphm.  The value 7 pphm lies 1.93 standard
                                     1-14

-------
deviations to the right of the mean.

        3.  Correlation and Regression Analysis

            The highest correlation of .48 was 'for the CO variable.  This
was followed by a correlation of .33 for NO and -.25 for total sky cover.
A 6-variable subset (CO, NO, pressure, temperature, relative humidity, and
total sky cover) yielded a regression significant at the 99.999-percent level
in which the standard error of estimate was .099 and the shrunken multiple
correlation coefficient was .56.  Correspponding to the above sample standard
error of estimate, the following 95 percent confidence band was derived:

                                 .63(0^) <_ OXj^) <_ 1.58(03^)

        4.  Auto- and Cross-Correlation Analysis

            Case 1 (first high oxidant episodic sequence;  (July 26 to 28)

            The total oxidant auto-correlation function exhibits the previously
discussed properties.  That is, very high correlation of .93 at lag 1, gradually
decreasing through values of .82 at lag 2, .63 at lag 3, etc.  The other
photochemical pollutants for which data are available have fair to good corre-
lations at lag 1 but drop rapidly for higher lag numbers.  The largest total
oxidant cross-correlation (in absolute value) of -.58 occurs at lag 1 for NO.

            Case 2 (low oxidant sequence;  (November 17 to 21)

            The total oxidant autocorrelation function has values of .85,
.66, .47, .27, and .09 for lags 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively.  The highest
auto-correlation of .93 at lag 1 is for N0«.   The highest cross-correlation of
.54 occurred between total oxidant concentration and wind speed.

            Case 3 (second high episodic sequence;  (November 25 to 27)

            This appears to be a L' s>hly atypical episode.  It is in this sequence
of days that several instantaneous    ^ks occur during the evening:  that is,
three peak oxidant levels are observed during the 23rd hour.  Without a minutely
detailed investigation of the environmental circumstances, the performance
status of the instrumentation, etc., it would be unwise to put forth as valid
even the most cursory interpretation.
                                     1-15

-------
                                 APPENDIX  II
                    MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL

                        METEOROLOGICAL MODULE EQUATIONS


1.0            INTRODUCTION

The meteorological module computes the values of six trajectory point output
variables and their time derivatives as a function of time and trajectory
position inputs.  Wind velocity x and y components, temperature, pressure,
relative humidity, weather cover and mixing depth and their time derivatives
are estimated via weighted inverse distance squared interpolations on time-
correspondent values among all "permissible" meteorological stations.  Per-
missible stations are those which lie together with the trajectory point on
one side of each line segment of a set of predefined polygonal barriers.
Given height above sea level, temperature, and the x and y components of wind
velocity, the module derives a mixing depth and a mixing depth time derivative.

The mixing height is computed by passing a straight line of slope -.00986
(the dry adiabatic lapse rate) through the trajectory height-temperature point
and determining the abscissa of its intersection with one of two polygonal
temperature-versus-height radiosonde curves.  The appropriate curve is selected
on the basis of input time.

The mixing height derivative is computed as a linear function of the temperature
and hiiight-above-sea-level derivatives, which in turn are derived from inter-
polating equations for the temperature and height and the interpolating
equations for the x and y components of velocity.  The mixing depth and mixing
depth derivative are computed by subtracting interpolated height-above-sea-
Level and derivative from mixing height and its derivative

2.0            DERIVATIONS

2.1            Definition of the Barrier and Permissible Stations

Each barrier is defined by an integer N , which is one greater than the number
of barrier sides, and a sequence of points (x., y.), i*l, 2, . . t N , with
each consecutive pair of points defining a sicle or the barrier.  Let (x , y )
and (x , y ) be, respectively, the coordinate of the trajectory point and a°
given station.  Let m=(y -y )/(x -x ), b=y -mx  be the slope and y the intercept
of the line joining the trajectory point to the station.  For each i=l, 2, . . .,
NB-1 let

-------
                                X     VmiXJ-bi                               (2-1)
                                                                               (2-2)
A station located at (x ,y ) is said to be permissible if, and only if, for
each 1.1, 2 ..... NB-l8either ^iP.X^l.jj^O or y^l.

fl.              INTERPOLATION OF METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES

Let (x . »y.) be the coordinates of each permissible station (j"l,2,...N ).
Let, d^.d^.d-,... ,d   be the distance from these stations to the trajeBtory

point and let x.. »x_,*). . . . ,£..  be, for example, the corresponding set of
observed x components of winfl velocity.  The x component of wind velocity,
x , at the trajectory point is estimated according to:

                                  N
Each of the five remaining trajectory point variables is estimated by the
corresponding analogue to equation (2-2.1).

The time derivative, p , of, say pressure, is computed according to


                                  ,      N


                             P°"2 { BP°" J-l J

where                       N              N

                             ~   >2   „   -
                                     and
                            J-l            J-l

Each of the remaining trajectory time derivatives is estimated analagous  to
(2-2.2).
                                      II-2
                                                                               (2-2.3)

-------
C.           COMPUTATION OF MIXING HEIGHT AND MIXING HEIGHT DERIVATIVE

Civen the interpolated values (z ,T ) of height al>ovc sea level and  temperature
at our trajectory point, the module selects the appropriate A.M. or  P.M. radio-
sonde curve depending on the value t .  liach of these curves is defined by an
integer N     or N     and a sequence of points (z.  ,T. ) k=l,2,...N    ,    N.
         a.m.     p.m.         ^         r        k  k            a.m. (p.m.)
The mixing height, h  , is computed according to:
                           T -T. 4n> z.-az
                       h =  o  k  K. k   o
                               V
where k is the first  integer such that l anda=--00986 °C/meter.
Tho mixing height derivative, h , is computed according to:
111.         Svmbol Glossary and Units

 x  [meters/minute] = x component of wind velocity
    | motors/minute ] = y component of wind velocity
 yo
 T  [degree centigrade (°C)] = temperature

 p  [millibar] = pressure
 H  [ (iimens Ion less ] = relative humidity

 w  [ dimension less ] = cloud cover

 /.  [meters] = height-above-sea level
  o
 h  [meters] = mixing height

 h   [nu'tcrs/miuutc ]
  in
                                       II-3

-------
T  [°C/minute)
 o



P  [millibars/minute]
 o



H  [I/minutes]
 o
w   [I/minutes]
 0


z   [meters/iainute]
 o
                                      11-4

-------
                    ULTRAVIOLET  IRRADIANCE MODULE EQUATIONS


1 .0           INTRODUCTION

The basic physical hypotheses underlying this module's computations have been
taken almost directly from [1].  Our departure is in the formulation of a
total irradiance equation which takes into account albedo and weather effects
and which reduces to a standard form (see equation 11-29 of  [1]) when the
cloud cover and albedo are both zero.  Thus, our final formulation  (see equation
2-7) will differ from any developed on the basis of equation (11-38) of [1].
The input to the module is the time t , the height above sea level of the
trajectory point, z , the relative humidity at the trajectory point H , the

corresponding atmospheric pressure p , the mixing depth,  h  , the weather
                                    o                      m
cover, w , and the average concentration of N07, C^Q , in the column.  The

module's output is the specific absorption rate of N0_, k^  .
                                                     £•   N\)j


2.0           DERIVATIONS

As a function of the time of day, t   (Pacific Standard Time), a value of the

solar zenith angle 0, is interpolated from a table derived from the equinox curve of
Figure 2. in Chapter II of [1],  The air mass, m, is interpolated as a function
of 9 in Table 2 of [1].

Depending on an input cloud-type parameter, a value of average fraction of
radiation transmitted, 0, is interpolated in Tabl* 10 of  [1],  For each

wavelength band of 100A in a wavelength region of 3000A £ X £ 4000A, the
molecular scattering coefficient (s .)  is selected from Table 3 of  [1],  From
                                   IDA o
equation (II-9) of [1], the transmissivity relative to molecular scattering,
T  , may be computed from the formula
 ttlA
                         10«10 TmX a -(SmX>

where p  is the interpolated pressure in millibars.

The transmissivity relative to particle scattering, T ., may be computed from
the formula (11-11) of fl] (with X in microns)       pX

                 log1Q T x - -(3. 75x10" 3X~2W+3.5xlO~2X~*75d)m                   (2-2)
                                        II-5

-------
where W is the amount of precipitable water vapor In the atmosphere, measured
vertically above the trajectory point, computed as in equation  (II-2) of  [1],
in units of centimeters, according to:

                        W - 1.722xlO-VJ10~(Z°/22'000)                          (2-3)
                                       W
Where PW is the partial pressure in millibars of water vapor at the trajectory point.
PW is interpolated from a vapor pressure table in [2], and d is a dimensionless

parameter of preset nominal value 1.

The ozone absorption coefficient a.  [meters  ] is interpolated from Table 5 and
                                  A
the transmissivity of ozone, T . , as in equation (11-13) of  [1], aay fca computed
from

                            lo*10 TaX ° -QX(03>m                                <2-4>
where (0.) is a preset parameter of nominal value 2.2x10*"  [meters] (of ozone).


The mean solar spectral irradiance, IQ , is selected from Table 1 and the

direct and sky radiation I,, and 1  . are computed from equations  (11-15) and
(11-16):                  dA      8A
                             - TsX TaX 'OX COs6
                                                                                (2-6)
where T  , =• T  ,T  , and g  is a preset dimensionless parameter  of nominal value .5.
       SA    mA pA
Following the development from equations  (11-17) through  (11-28) of  [1]  and
taking average weather cover and an average albedo effect  into account,  we
obtain the formula for the average rate of absorption per  unit pollutanto
column volume for direct and sky radiation over a wavelength  band of  100A
centered at wavelength X, I .:


Iax
                                       h
                                        m
where_ a is the albedo  (preset nominal value of  .235), wo  is  the weather  cover,
and C..  is the average column concentration.of NO.,  a.  now refers  to N0_.
     N02                                          4     A                  *•

Finally, the specific  absorption rate of M>2> k»,   derived from equations (11-31)
and (11-32) of [1] is  computed as:
                                        II-6

-------
                                              .  4000A

                                      lfi/'273+T\« T

                             •!•  ... in~ibi	2.1 >   I  ,
                                X iU    I  -    I /  .  3A
                            7.2
                                        I \f ^»»^  I —


                                                 »300oX
3.            UNITS



All lengths are in meters.



Time Is in minutes.



Temperature is in  C.



AJ1 pressures are in millibars.


                         -2        -1    ° -1
I    are in photons meters   minutes   (100A)
CNO  l3 i



k    is in minutes




w  is dimensionless.
 o
  Is dimensionless.
              REFERENCES
[I]  P. A. Leighton, Photochemistry of Air Pollution,  Academic Press,  New

     York, 1961.



12]  Handbook of Physics and Chemistry.
                                       II-7

-------
                           KINETICS MODULE EQUATIONS


1.0          INTRODUCTION

We first characterize an abstract k step -N  species constant mass, constant

volume chamber photochemical mechanism.  As a consequence of this character-
ization, using standard principles of chemical kinetics, we can write, in
compact notation, the differential equations of species concentration for
the constant volume, constant mass situation.  Next, we expand our conceptual
framework to the chemical kinetics of the contents of a pollutant column whose
motion over a time-varying field of urban emission sources induces variations
in average column temperature, volume mass, etc.  This is accomplished by
adding a series of appropriate first order pertubation terms to the species
concentration time derivatives.  It is to be emphasized that the step number
and number of species characterizing our imbedded kinetic mechanism are limited
only by computer storage and computation time considerations.  For this reason
we are utilizing the IBM 360-67, a high-speed, large storage computer, In con-
junction with an auxiliary FORTRAN system whose function is to derive a set
of differential equations from a corresponding set of photochemical equations.
Thus, we have complete flexibility in step number, species number and, more
Importantly, the photochemical equations themselves.

The Inputs to the module are the outputs of the weather, diffusion, and
ultraviolet irradiance modules.

2.0          DERIVATIONS

An abstract k-step, N -species, constant-volume, constant-mass photochemical
mechanism is characterized by  (i) a binary valued kxN  matrix B whose (1, J)
element, b  , is 1 if and only if the jth species appears as a reactant In the
1   (elementary) step; (11) an integer valued kxN  species conservation matrix,
P, whose (1, J) element, P ., is the number of molecules of species j produced
(p.,.i>0) °r consumed (p..<0) in the ith step; (ill) a K-element vector F of
reaction rate factors k., j " 1, 2....K; and (iv) a N - element vector, C ,
of initial concentrations, c»(0), £•!, 2,...,N .  From the above definitions and
elementary considerations of chemical kinetics, we may formulate the following
set of differential equations:
                                      II-8

-------
n
                                                 \
                                                 >/
                                       (2-1)
                  c.co) - cio
or, in matrix-vector form:
                  C(t) - P R(t)
                                       (2-2)
                  C(0) - CQ,
where
                           c(t)
                                    c2(t)
                                    c3(t)
                                    c (t)
                                     No
                                       (2-3)
                                     II-9

-------
                  R(t)
                                  n
                                   n   ca(t)
                                                                  (2-4)
 and  P   is  the  transpose of  P.



 Taking  equation (2-2)  as our  starting point,  we permit  F to be time-varying

 (i.e.,  k.  are  replaced by k.(t))  and add  first order perturbations due to
         J            ,       J                 •

 stationary sources,  C0(t),  traffic  sources, C_(t),  and  the rate of change of
                     O                       1

 column  volume,  C.(t),  to derive the pollutant column concentration differential

 equations:
                       C(t)
                                                                  (2-5)
                       C(0)
 where
                                0 if h <0
                                      m-
                                -h

                                 •r0- C(t)  if h >0
                                 n_          m
                                  m
                                                                               (2-6)
3.0
UNITS
All concentrations are in parts per hundred million.  Concentration rates are in

pphm/minute.  h  (mixing depth) is in meters h  (mixing depth time derivative)
               tu                              m

Is in meters/tninute.
                                      11-10

-------
                        TRAFFIC MODULE EQUATIONS
 1 .             INTRODUCTION

 We  first note  that  the present module represents a "first pass" attempt
 to  provide working  traffic emission inputs for the photochemical simulation
 model.  As such a prototype  it is necessarily based on a set of simplifying
 assumptions  leading to a compact formulation which, nevertheless, takes
 Into account such parameters as total daily vehicle mileage, area
 population ratios,  emission  rates, diurnal traffic variations and local
 meteorology.

 In characterizing the module, the Los Angeles Basin is subdivided into a
 #rid system of 784  equal 4-square-mile squares corresponding to a 56- by
 56-mile square total area.  To each of these grid areas is assigned a
 daily vehicle mileage ratio representing the ratio of the daily mileage
 in this subarea to  the total daily mileage.   The module is further
 characterized by a  set of pollutant emission rates given in grams per mile,
 a traffic density function, and a total vehicle mileage figure.  The emission
 rates are computed  from published emission factor data by an auxiliary
 preprocessing program.  The inputs to the module are the time, t, the position
 of the pollutant column, (x,y), the temperature,  T ,  the pressure,  p , and
 the mixing-depth,   h , at (x,y) and their corresponding time derivatives,
 T , p ,  and h .
 0*0       m

The module's output is the vector of concentration rates, c_, due to traffic.

 2 .           DERIVATIONS

Given the position  (x,y) (in miles) such that 16
where [z] = integer part of z.
Let I. (a preset constant of nominal value 1.2x10 ) be the daily vehicle
mileage.  Let E. and m  be, respectively, the average emission rates
(grams/mile) and the gram molecular weight of the jth pollutant (j-i, <_,... ,N )
                                  11-11

-------
Then, assuming uniform areal distribution, the number of moles of the jth

                                         2
pollutant emitted by traffic in a 1 meter  subarea of the ita grid up

to time t, n (t), is given by:

            ^                          t
                              - r LE   f

              n4(t) - 9.64x10   -i—i / f(s)ds                          (2-2)
               J                 m4  J

                                  J  0



where (see Figure II-l)




                      a if 0
-------
                         DIURNAL TRAFFIC VOLUME CURVE
   .14-
   .12-
   .10-
   .08-
o
   .06-
   .04-
   .02-
0    2
                —1	r-
                4    6
—T~
 8
10
12   14
  HOURS
16   18   20   22   24
                               FIGURE II-I.
                                   11-13

-------
              UNITS
h  [meters]
 in

p  [millibars]

 w


h  [meters/rain.]
 m


o  [millibars/min]
 G


r  [dimensionless]



L  [miles]



E  [grama/mile]



f(t)  [1/hours]
                                  11-14

-------
                 STATIONARY STACK SOURCE (DIFFUSION) EQUATIONS


1.0          INTRODUCTION

The.1 Stationary Stack Source or Diffusion module computes the contribution
to the concentration derivatives of NO and NO  in a pollutant column with
position (x ,y ) and velocity (x ,y ) due to presence of upwind stationary
stack sources.  The set of such sources is characterized by an integer N
                                                                        s
and a N x9 matrix of stack parameters (x,y,z,H,D,V,T,P,Q),
       s                   e            s  J s'  s   s   s   s   s   s  xs  '
s-l,2,..,N , where (x ,y ) is the position of the stack, z  the height of  its
          o          S  S                                 S
base above sea level, H  its height, D  its diameter, V  the exhaust speed of
                       ia              S                S
its gas, T  its inside temperature, P  its ambient atmospheric pressure, and
          S                          S
Q  its emission rate of NO.  Module computations are based on the assumption

of small variation in wind velocity both spatially and temporally for "nearby"
upwind stack sources.  This supposition allows us to use the standard stationary
source diffusion equations to be found, for example, in reference (1).  It
is to be noted that such a hypothesis serves to emphasize the "credible episode"
nature of the photochemical modle.

The inputs to the module are column position X, column velocity X_, pressure
p , temperature, T , mixing depth,  h , height above-sea-level, z , the correspond-
ing time derivatives and the time t .  The output is total stationary source conce
concentration derivatives for NO ana NO .        '

2 . 0          DERIVATIONS

Lot X- (x ,y ) and X=x ,y ) be the position and velocity vectors of a pollutant

column.   For each stack source s=l,2,...,N  whose position vector X =(x ,y )
                                          S                        o   S   S
        s (X-X ).X>0, the module determines the corner of the column base
           --
nearest the stack from among the four candidates: X +  1 (x ,y ) +  1 (y ,-x )
                                                  ___  0  o  _ _  o   o

Denoting tins nearest corner position as j( ,  the downwind distance from the
stack to the nearest corner, C . is computed  according to:
                              s
                                      =(XS-X )-X/s
                                       \      /   '
                                  s =  ,!XM  =x  x   + y
(2-J)
                                      11-15

-------
The cross-wind distance from the centerline,  n  >  i«  computed according  to:
Following (1\ from equation (3.1)  on page 5 we may compute  the mass
contribution of NO , M  from stack s to a column of  unit  square  cross
                  X   S

sectional areas and height h  (mixing depth) according to:
                                                                                (2-2)
                                   n+1  h
  f  f  f
 J  J  J  X
x«C y«n Z»Z
                                           (x,y,z)dzdydx
                                                                        +H
                                                                        (2-3)
 where K »h +z  (mixing height) and
         m m  o
 Qg	i    r

]}.
 Denoting the molar  contribution of NO and NO. from stack s to the column as


 n^^ and  n.^,  respectively, assuming that these molar contributions are


 proportional to  the existing column concentrations Cun and CMrt , and taking
                                                    HU      HU-

 into account the conservation of mass, we haver
                                        CNOn2s
 or,  solving  for  n   , and n   :
                                11-16

-------
                          nls " 30(CN04CHO ) "a                                  (2-7)


                                   So.
                              _ 	£	_ u
                          n28 * •»*'-•~   r «-
From the Ideal gas law, we compute Che number of moles of air  in  the

column, n, according to:
                                       pohm
                               1013.25 RT   '
                                          o
and we compute the total upwind stacks to column concentration  contributions

of NO and NO., C..n „ and Cu.  c» respectively, as:
            i   NU|S      NO-,*
                              io8^    2
                      CNO, S " T { s: (X-XJ -X>0 ^ i8                              (2-9)
or
                    CNO,S ' 2-77xlOJUNOVW                                        (2-10)




                    CN02,S ' 2
where
                    UN02
                              11-17

-------
                    V - (T +273)/p h
                          o       o m
                           £      "•
 W -
Differentiating with respect to time:


              So •
where
- 2.77xlO:'(U
                               Mn
                                 9      2      2
              "NO -
                                                VW),
                                                             (2-11)
                                                             (2-12)
              U
               N0
              V -
              W -
                  {8:o} * * '
       5+1
                                                                         .
                                                                    o  sv
                                                                        x- C
                                     2cr  (X)       z
                                 11-18

-------
where "h"  is the mixing height derivative, z  is the time derivative of height
       m                                   o
                 •                                         •
above-sea-level, T  is the column temperature derivative, p , is the column


                  °               fu /  3 \
pressure derivative, erf (u) •  j. lexpl-u  ) du. 
-------