4905
""'ed States
.iionmental Protection
350R90101
PA Office^
..ispector General
Report to Congress
Fiscal 1
ca
"/, "
FT
-------
-------
The Inspector General Act of 1978 (P.L 95-452), as
amended, created the Office of Inspector General to
consolidate existing investigative and audit resources in
independent organizations headed by Inspectors General.
The OIG's role is to review EPA's financial transactions,
programs, and administrative activities; investigate allegations
or evidence of possible criminal and civil violations; and
promote economic, efficient, and effective operations within
the Agency.
The EPA Inspector General reports directly to the
Administrator and the Congress and has the authority to:
Initiate and carry out independent and objective audits and
investigations,
Issue subpoenas for evidence and information,
Obtain access to any materials in the Agency,
Report serious or flagrant problems to Congress,
Select and appoint OIG employees,
Fill Senior Executive Service positions,
Administer oaths, and
Enter into contracts.
The Inspector General is appointed by, and can be
removed only by, the President. This independence protects
the OIG from interference and allows it to function as the
Agency's fiscal and operational watchdog.
Office of Inspector General
Inspector General
John C. Martin
Deputy Inspector General
Anna Hopkins Virbick
Office
-------
Information reported in the semiannual report for the period
ending March 31,1990 may have been adjusted subsequent
to the end of that period. Consequently, totals for the two
periods may not add to the fiscal year totals presented below.
Audit Operation* Fiscal 1990
Questioned Costs Total* $267.7 Million
- Federal Share $199.2 Million
Recommended Efficiencies
(Funds be Put to Better Use)
-Total* $184.7 Million
- Federal Share $162.0 Million
Costs Disallowed to be Recovered
- Federal Share $ 73.9 Million
(costs which EPA management agrees
are unallowable and Is committed to
recover or offset against future
payments)
Costs Disallowed as Cost Efficiency
- Federal Share $119.3 Million
(funds made available by EPA
management's commitment to implement
recommendations in DIG performance or
preaward audits)
Recoveries from Audit Resolutions of $ 56.8 Million
Current and Prior Periods
(cash collections or offsets to
future payments)**
EPA Audits Performed/Issued by DIG 1928
Audit Reports Resolved (agreement 671
by Agency officials to take satisfactory
corrective action)
Investigative Operations
Fines and Recoveries (including civil) $3,805,579
Investigations Opened 242
Investigations Closed 251
Indictments of Persons or Firms 17
Convictions of Persons or Firms 15
Administrative Actions Taken Against
EPA Employees 23
Fraud Detection and Prevention Operations
Debarments, Suspensions, Voluntary 140
Exclusions, and Settlement Agreements
(actions to deny persons or firms from
participating in EPA programs or
operations because of misconduct or
poor performance)
Hotline Complaints Received 47
Proposed Legislative and Regulatory 159
Items Reviewed
Personnel Security Investigations 725
Adjudicated
* Questioned Costs: Ineligible, Unsupported and
Unnecessary/Unreasonable; and Recommended Efficiencies
(Funds be Put to Better Use) are subject to change
pending further review In the audit resolution process.
" Information on recoveries from audit resolution is
provided by the EPA Financial Management Division and
is unaudited.
-------
Questioned Costs and Recommended Efficiencies by
Type of Report - FY 90
Construction Others Superiund Int/Mgt
Non-fed flee Eft Fed Stae Rec. Eft. Non-Fed Quest Federal Quest
Examples of Significant Audits
The following represents examples of some of our most
significant types of findings. They should not be considered
representative of the overall adequacy of EPA management.
Audit Spurs Rapid Action to Tighten Controls Over
Banned Pesticides
We found that EPA had not monitored and periodically
inspected most banned pesticide storage locations to
determine whether the pesticide was safely stored nor always
required holders to overpack corroding or leaking containers
to prevent spills. EPA had not informed banned pesticide
holders of their legal obligation to notify emergency planners
and fire officials of banned pesticide storage locations or
emergency handling procedures. Regions and States could
not fully identify and inspect all known banned pesticide
storage locations because EPA had not fully developed
procedures to match Headquarters, Region, and State
records. EPA had not investigated cases where EPA
pesticide contractor records suggested questionable holder
disposal actions.
EPA acted promptly on all the issues we raised during the
audit. During our review, EPA issued a banned pesticide
strategy to its Regions and the States requiring them to
monitor and inspect storage locations. EPA also implemented
a plan to have emergency planners and fire officials receive
its banned pesticide storage location list. In addition, EPA
took initiatives to better account for the banned pesticide
quantities and storage locations.
-------
Increased Efforts Needed to Protect the Public
Against Lead in Drinking Water
EPA and the States in Region 3 were not ensuring that school
children and the public were adequately protected against
excessive levels of lead in drinking water. EPA estimates that
every year over 250,000 children are exposed to lead in
drinking water at a level high enough to impair their
intellectual and physical development. The 1986 amendments
to the Safe Drinking Water Act banned the use of lead
materials in new plumbing and in plumbing repairs and
required water suppliers to notify the public about lead in their
drinking water. In 1988, the Lead Contamination Control Act
required EPA, States, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission, and schools and day care centers to safeguard
children from the hazards of lead in drinking water. We found
that the States in Region 3 had not developed adequate
programs to assist schools and day care centers deal with
lead contamination in their drinking water. While some of the
schools did limited, improper, or no testing, many schools
testing found that their water contained unacceptable levels of
lead. EPA did not pursue the States' lack of enforcement
concerning the public notification and lead ban requirements
of the SDWA.
Prior to the issuance of our draft report, EPA promptly
took corrective action on our finding concerning confusion
over acceptable limits of lead in drinking water from school
fountains. The Office of Drinking Water developed an Alert
for Laboratory Directors requesting their assistance in
notifying school administrators that EPA recommends they
take remedial action whenever lead levels exceed 20 ppb at
one of their drinking water outlets.
Inadequate User Charges Jeopardize Billions of
Public Investment Dollars in Wastewater Treatment
Plants
About $75 billion of Federal, State, and local monies have
been invested to construct and/or rehabilitate approximately
15,600 municipal wastewater treatment facilities to prevent
continued degradation of the nation's waters and restore
contaminated rivers, lakes, and streams. The Clean Water
Act requires that grantees generate sufficient revenues to
cover the operation and maintenance costs of their
wastewater treatment facilities. We found that EPA was not
ensuring that grantees continually generate enough income
through adequate user charge systems to meet operation and
maintenance costs of their wastewater treatment plants.
Local governments' failure to adequately fund the operation
and maintenance of some treatment plants has already
caused deterioration and failure of the facilities and
degradation of water quality. Some were not capable of
functioning at their designed level of operation and were in
violation of their effluent permits.
-------
Stronger Enforcement Needed to Prevent Damage
From Oil Spills
Over two years after the massive oil spills at the Ashland Oil
facility in Pennsylvania and the Shell Oil facility in California,
aggressive enforcement actions were not always taken when
violations of EPA's Oil Pollution Prevention regulations were
disclosed. EPA's Oil Pollution Prevention regulations
implement the oil spill prevention and removal provisions of
the Clean Water Act. These regulations require the owners
and operators of certain oil storage facilities to prepare Spill
Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans
outlining measures to prevent spills and contain those that do
occur before they reach navigable waters. EPA's Region
offices administer an inspection program to ensure that
facilities comply with the regulations. Although the Agency
has initiated some corrective measures as a result of past
reviews, more action is clearly needed. While Regions 5 and
6 had effective SPCC enforcement programs, we found that
effective enforcement action was not always taken by Regions
3 and 4 against facilities that violated EPA's Oil Pollution
Prevention regulations. The enforcement actions taken by
Regions 3 and 4 did not ensure that violating facilities
eventually achieved compliance with the Agency's regulations.
Region 4 Wetlands Program Needs Significant
Improvements
Wetlands are a valuable natural resource which provide many
essential functions, such as maintaining ground-water quality,
protecting shorelines from erosion, and serving as habitat for
a large diversity of birds and fish. Only about 95 million acres
of the original 215 million acres of wetlands in the contiguous
United States remain today. Unless program changes and
improvements are undertaken, further erosion of the
Southeast's valuable and vulnerable wetlands resources are
inevitable. We found that Region 4 had not effectively
managed the wetlands protection program to minimize
wetlands losses. The Region had not (1) identified wetlands
for permitting, (2) imposed stringent enforcement actions
against unpermitted discharges, (3) established adequate
procedures and controls for monitoring public notice reviews
to influence Corps of Engineers permit decisions, or (4)
established an overall strategy for guiding development of
delegated State responsibilities under the Clean Water Act.
As a result, wetlands losses were justified based on
developers' promises of future wetlands creation, restoration,
or enhancement.
Over $29 Million of Questioned Costs Claimed by
Honolulu, Hawaii
We found that EPA awarded thirteen grants totaling
$54,208,201 to the City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, to
fulfill multiple objectives, including the construction of
wastewater treatment facilities and collector systems. We
questioned $17,655,814 of the grantee's final claim as
-------
ineligible. We also questioned, as unreasonable, $8,533,513
for underutilized facilities that were operating at less than 75
percent of their design capacity and $551,639 for a planning
grant which was never completed and for which design and
construction grants had never been awarded. The grantee
also claimed $2,493,500 of unnecessary costs incurred for
equipment items that were not in service.
San Diego, California, Claimed $36.6 Million of
Questioned Costs
We found that EPA awarded three grants totaling $26,916,934
to the City of San Diego for the construction of improvements
at Pump Station No. 2 and the Point Loma Wastewater
Treatment Plant. We questioned $13,177,522 of the
grantee's final claim as ineligible. We also questioned
$14,641,849 of unreasonable technical services costs in
excess of the approved grant amounts and project costs
pending submission of an approvable sewer use ordinance.
The grantee also claimed $8,823,346 of unnecessary costs
incurred for the construction of gas utilization facilities with no
water quality benefits. The facilities were constructed to
generate electricity for sale.
Region 4 Inadequately Managed Super-fund
"Removial" Cleanups
Region 4's inadequate implementation and ineffective
management of Superfund "removial" cleanup actions (1) did
not meet "removial" goals to expedite remedial cleanup and to
delete sites from EPA's National Priorities List (NPL)
(delisting), and (2) resulted in over $3.8 million in potentially
excessive costs and obligations. Region 4 ambitiously
initiated a pilot "removial" cleanup approach which used
removal authorities to expedite remedial actions and NPL site
delisting at less cost than projected for remedial cleanups.
Eight NPL sites scheduled for remedial actions in fiscal 1988
were selected for "removial" cleanup. We found that after two
years and $15 million in obligations, of which $8.7 million had
been expended, only 3 of the 8 sites had been partially
cleaned and none had been delisted.
Millions Owed Superfund Trust Fund Were Not
Promptly Collected
Our annual audits of the Superfund trust fund have
consistently reported that amounts due from cost recovery
actions were not timely recorded. Those reports warned the
Agency that a large number of unrecorded receivables
significantly lessens management control over their collection.
In response, the Agency instituted actions seeking improved
controls over Superfund receivables. We found that
Agency-wide controls over Superfund receivables had not
improved. EPA Headquarters and Regions 3, 4 and 5 were
not promptly recording in the Agency's financial management
system, monies owed by responsible parties, resulting in at
-------
least $103,856 of lost interest to the trust fund. For fiscal
1989, $5.3 million of $5.9 million, or 90 percent of the costs to
be recovered, were not recorded promptly as accounts
receivable. Further, EPA was not promptly collecting amounts
owed the Superfund trust fund. If amounts owed by
responsible parties were collected promptly, the Government
could have invested these monies earlier.
Reliability of Superfund Reporting System in
Question
Superfund's management information system, CERCLIS, is
the required and sole source of Superfund planning and
accomplishment data. CERCLIS was developed to support
Superfund program, site, and project management. It was
also supposed to be the primary source of data for Superfund
strategic decisions. We found that insufficient controls and
oversight of EPA's Superfund management information
system rendered the data used for Superfund program
decisions and action unreliable. Controls and oversight were
limited for the initial CERCLIS development effort and
subsequent oversight. Essential documentation detailing
computer program logic for CERCLIS was poor. Lax controls
over CERCLIS report programs allowed programmers to
change reports without approval. As a result, reports
produced could not be relied upon to provide accurate
information for management. CERCLIS officials relied upon
negative comments from report users as a way of determining
report acceptability.
Region 6 Action Needed to Stop the Loss of
Louisiana Coastal Wetlands
We found that EPA's Region 6 was not controlling the
negative impacts of oil and gas activities on Louisiana's
coastal wetlands. Region 6 failed to issue any National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general
permits for oil and gas discharges into coastal Louisiana
wetlands, even though the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(now the Clean Water Act) required the Agency to issue these
permits more than 15 years ago. According to Region 6's
permitting schedule, another 4 years will pass before all oil
and gas general permits are issued. Further, the Region had
not initiated wetlands enforcement actions for unpermitted
dredge and fill activities. Region 6 did not visit proposed oil
and gas dredge and fill sites in coastal Louisiana wetlands as
part of its review process, nor does it regularly attend
scheduled permit review meetings. Further, the Region has
neither denied nor elevated to a higher authority any proposed
oil and gas dredge and fill permits in coastal Louisiana.
-------
Audit Resolution
During fiscal 1990, the Office of Inspector General issued
1,928 new audit reports and closed 671. Of the 300 audit
reports in the follow-up system at year end, 64 reports
remained for which no management decision was made within
6 months of issuance.
Of the audits closed, $73.9 million of costs were
disallowed for recovery, and $119.2 million were agreed to by
EPA management as funds that could be put to better use.
The Agency reported cost recoveries from current and prior
periods of $8.3 million in cash collections, and $48.6 million in
offsets against billings.
Agency Improves Control Over Hazardous Waste
Exports
A March 1988 audit showed that hundreds of tons of
hazardous waste were exported in violation of regulations and
that EPA needed a coordinated effort to ensure compliance.
Our followup report found that EPA had responsibly
implemented many corrective actions: EPA's National
Enforcement Investigations Center referrals resulted in
enforcement actions with penalties ranging from $5,000 to
$41,000; EPA and Customs inspected hazardous waste
exports at 15 border locations; because of EPA training,
Customs increased manifest collection tenfold; and after
receiving reminders from EPA, 300 companies reported their
hazardous waste exports in 1988, a 400 percent increase.
Chesapeake Bay Deficiencies Not Corrected
Almost four years after the first of two audit reports on the
Chesapeake Bay Program was issued, EPA Region 3 had not
resolved many of the deficiencies disclosed in those reports.
The reports evaluated procedures for administering grants and
contracts valued at about $50 million. During February 1990,
we completed a followup review of the corrective actions
taken by Region 3 as a result of these audits. We found that
the corrective actions taken were neither effective nor
completed timely. The action plan submitted in response to
the first audit required Region 3 to determine the status of 29
grants and contracts and to close out those that were not
ongoing. We found that 6 projects were ongoing and Region
3 had properly completed or closed only one of the remaining
23 grants and contracts. Region 3 could not locate the official
files for 14 of these 23 projects. Additionally, the corrective
actions proposed as a result of the second Chesapeake Bay
audit were also not completed. After we issued our followup
report, Region 3 took action to correct the deficiencies.
Region 3 reduced the excessive Federal funds retained by
Pennsylvania. The shortage of state matching funds was
resolved and significant progress was made to obtain overdue
work products.
-------
During this fiscal year, our investigative efforts resulted in 32
indictments and convictions and over $3.8 million of fines and
recoveries from persons or firms who defrauded the Agency.
Pipe Company Owner Sentenced in Fraud Case
Theodore A. Gallucci, owner of Tag Pipe, Inc., the principal
supplier of fabricated pipes and pipe fittings to New York
City's water and sewer main contractors, was sentenced on
December 11,1989, after pleading guilty to charges of
conspiring to transport stolen pipes for use on EPA-funded
projects, and to commit tax evasion. He received 3 years
probation. The scheme involved the theft of about $1 million in
New York City property by paying city employees responsible
for maintaining the city's pipe yards about $250,000 in bribes
for access to the material in those yards. The investigation
was conducted jointly by the EPA Office of Inspector General,
the New York City Department of Investigations, the Office of
Inspector General of the New York City Office of
Environmental Protection, the Internal Revenue Service, and
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Asbestos Contractor Convicted on Bribe Charge
Robert Henkel, former president of HRF Surface Cleaning
Inc., was convicted on June 7,1990 on one count of bribing
an EPA asbestos inspector to avoid job sites at which
asbestos removal projects were being carried out. Henke!
was sentenced to two years in prison, of which 18 months
was suspended, and fined $100,000. He was also placed on
three years probation following his prison term. Henkel is the
23rd asbestos removal contractor to have either pled guilty or
been convicted of paying bribes. The inspector was
sentenced last year for conspiring to accept bribes of more
than $170,000 from asbestos removal contractors during the
years 1983 through 1987. He was sentenced to 5 years
incarceration, of which 4-1/2 years was suspended. A joint
investigation of asbestos removal contractors in the New York
metropolitan area by the EPA Office of Inspector General and
the Office of Labor Racketeering of the U.S. Department of
Labor has resulted in the indictment of 28 contractors,
representing 22 companies. To date, $781,000 in fines has
been assessed.
Superfund Contract Laboratory Program
Investigation Yielding Formidable Results
The Office of Investigations has a major investigative initiative
underway within the Superfund program, directed at fraud in
the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). Laboratory analyses
under the CLP are the empirical basis for the entire Superfund
program. Based on testing for the presence of hazardous
chemicals by these laboratories, the Superfund program
decides which cleanups to initiate and how to carry them out.
Fraudulent analyses could result in a danger to the public
health and safety as well as the unnecessary expenditure of
cleanup funds. An example follows.
9
-------
Contract Lab Supervisor Indicted
Dr. Vinh Iran, a former group leader of the Gas
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer Unit at Weston Analytics,
Lionville, Pennsylvania, a division of Roy F. Weston, Inc., was
charged on July 30, 1990 with two counts of making false
statements to EPA. Dr. Iran had allegedly engaged in
backdating laboratory analysis results of certain water and soil
samples obtained from various Superfund sites by EPA and
submitted to Weston for analysis. It is further alleged that Dr.
Tran acted to conceal the fraud by a process known as "time
travel" which involved setting back the computer clock
attached to the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer
instruments to a date and time earlier than the actual date
and time in order to meet sample testing requirements set by
EPA. As reported previously, Roy F. Weston, Inc., paid the
Government $750,000 as part of a consent judgment in
response to a civil action filed by the Department of Justice
under the False Claims Act.
10
-------
Suspension and Debarment Activities
EPA's policy is to do business only with contractors, grantees,
and persons who are responsible, honest, and who comply
with applicable rules and regulations. EPA enforces this
policy by suspending or debarring any organization or person
for acting improperly, having a history of substandard work, or
willfully failing to perform on EPA or other Federally funded
activities. Suspensions and debarments deny participation in
Agency programs and activities to those who represent a risk
of abuse to the Government.
A nonprocurement debarment or suspension by one
Agency is effective in all. The General Services
Administration (GSA) publishes a "List of Parties Excluded
from Federal Procurement or Nonprocurement Programs."
In fiscal 1990, 140 debarment or suspension actions were
taken. Examples include:
Samar Chatterjee, general manager and sole stockholder of
AES Engineers, Inc., (AES) of Illinois, and president and
member of the Board of Directors of Universal Engineering
Services, Inc. (UES) of Indiana, pled guilty to knowingly,
willfully and unlawfully participating in a scheme to defraud
EPA. He was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment; probation
for a 5 year period; and ordered to pay restitution of $110,000
each to EPA and the South Stickney, Illinois, Sanitary District.
Chatterjee, UES and AES were debarred by EPA from
Federal procurement and assistance programs for 3 years.
EPA's OIG has uncovered adequate evidence supporting a
reasonable belief that one of EPA's Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP) participants, Metatrace, and one of its officials,
Carol Byington, may have committed acts of fraud and failed
to perform in accordance with the EPA CLP protocols.
Accordingly, EPA suspended Metatrace and Carol Byington
from participation in Federal assistance, loan and benefit
programs and activities, and all direct Federal procurement,
for a temporary period pending completion of investigation or
ensuing legal, debarment, and/or Program Fraud Civil
Remedies Act proceedings.
EPA debarred Robert L. Jackson, former vice president of
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company, from participation in
Federal assistance, loan, and benefit programs for 2 years
commencing December 11,1989. Jackson pled guilty to
conspiring to rig bids for dredging contracts in the Gulf of
Mexico. Jackson was also debarred from contracts under the
Federal Acquisition Regulation by the Department of the Army
for 9 months.
James Electric Company, Inc., of Huntington, West Virginia,
its President, Leonard T. James, JACO (an affiliated firm),
and its President, Maribeth James, were debarred for 3 years
in February 1990 for circumventing the EPA debarment
process. EPA had debarred James Electric Co., on
11
-------
December 12, 1987, following conviction for bid rigging on an
EPA-funded construction project. Following the James
Electric indictment, Maribeth James, Leonard James' wife,
incorporated a new electrical company, JACO, which
subsequently won a subcontract on an EPA-funded
construction project in Huntington. All evidence indicated that
James Electric had actually performed the work on the
project, not JACO.
Personnel Security Program
The Personnel Security Program is one of the Agency's first
line defenses against fraud, using background investigations
to review the integrity of EPA employees and contractors.
During fiscal 1990, 725 investigations were reviewed, resulting
in:
Six employees resigned pending administrative removal for
falsification of the SF-171, Application for Federal
Employment. The falsifications included: not listing prior
convictions, claiming college degrees not earned, misuse of
Government funds for personal gain, timecard fraud, and
using multiple social security numbers.
Seven employees received oral or written reprimands for
failing to list previous convictions on the SF-171.
Two contractor employees were denied access to
confidential business information because of failure to list
previous convictions and terminations, and use of controlled
substances, on the SF-86, Questionnaire for Sensitive
Positions.
Twenty employees were required to submit corrected SF-
171 s or SF-86s to list minor offenses they had failed to report.
One employee resigned pending administrative removal for
failure to qualify for a required security clearance because of
continuous use of controlled substances.
Committee on Integrity and Management
Improvement (CIMI)
The Committee on Integrity and Management Improvement,
established in 1984 by EPA Order 1130.1, coordinates the
Agency's efforts to minimize the opportunities for fraud, waste,
and mismanagement and advises the Administrator on
policies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of EPA's
programs and operations. Chaired by the Inspector General,
CIMI completed several projects including an /Awareness
Bulletin on Time and Attendance and an Awareness Bulletin
on Acceptance of Food, Refreshments or Entertainment.
CIMI also developed and coordinated a series of special
events during Public Service Recognition Week, to
communicate support and appreciation to EPA employees at
all levels. The program, hosted by EPA's Administrator,
William Reilly, was highlighted by speeches from Dr. Jerome
Karle, a Nobel Prize winner, and Dr. Frances Kelsey, formerly
of the Food and Drug Administration, who was primarily
responsible for stopping the importation of thalidomide into the
United States.
12
-------
The OIG Hotline Center receive / new complaints and
closed 48 cases during fiscal 1990. Of these, 18 resulted in
environmental, administrative, or prosecutive action. We also
received 2,986 calls in which callers were referred to the
appropriate program office, State agency, or other Federal
agency for assistance.
The following are examples of corrective action taken as a
result of information provided to the hotline center.
A complaint alleged that a company was emitting fumes
which were polluting the air. A review of the complaint
disclosed that the company was performing open spray
painting in violation of State air quality regulations which
prohibit the emission of air contaminants over the property of
other persons. Based on our inquiry, State authorities
informed the company of the violation, and the company
agreed that no further open spray painting would be
conducted on the property. The company was also advised
by the State that any future violations would result in
enforcement action.
A complaint alleged that a company was injecting oil into
the ground, as well as other toxic chemicals such as PCBs
and hydraulic fluids. A review of the complaint disclosed that
a sample of oil taken from the ground contained a PCB
content of 97 parts per million, which constitutes a disposal of
PCBs in an improper manner. As a result of this complaint,
the company was required to excavate the soil to a level at
which less than 10 parts per million were found and to
transport the contaminated soil to a disposal facility. The
company was also assessed a penalty of $5,000.
If you are aware of any fraud, waste, or mismanagement,
please contact the EPA Inspector General Hotline or the
appropriate Divisional Inspector General listed on back.
Information is confidential.
Caller may be anonymous.
Calls can be made toll free on (800) 424-4000. Callers in
area code 202 should use 382-4977. FTS network callers
may also use 382-4977.
Remember Act Like It's Your MoneyIt Is!
13
-------
Divisional Inspectors General
Region Subject Name
Headquarters Audit (Internal Edward Gekosky
Audit Div)
Investigations Francis C. Kitey
(Wash. Fid Office)
1 &2
4&6
7&8
9&10
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Audit
Paul McKechnie
Investigations Robert M. Byrnes
Paul R. Gandolfo
Investigations Martin Squitieri
Mary Boyer
Investigations James F. Johnson
Anthony Carrollo
5,7 & 8 Investigations Alex Falcon
Nikki Tinsley
Truman R. Beeter
Investigations H. Brooks Griffin
Telephone
FTS 398-8222
(703) 308-8222
FTS 398-8282
(703) 308-8282
FTS 835-3160
(617) 535-316C
FTS 264-0399
(212)264-0395
FTS 597-0497
(215)597-0497
FTS 597-9421
(215) 597-9421
FTS 257-3623
(404) 347-3625
FTS 257-2398
(404) 347-3622
FTS 353-2486
(312)353-248t
FTS 353-2507
(312) 353-2507
FTS 276-7824
(913) 551-782^
FTS 974-7084
(415)454-7084
FTS 454-8151
(415)974-8151
------- |