4996
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response
Washington DC 20460
October 1986
vvEPA
Superfund:
A Six Year Perspective
530R86124
-------
Introduction
Superfund was created in 1980
to clean up places where
hazardous wastes had
contaminated the environment
and threatened the health of
nearby residents.
Even before comprehensive
data had been compiled to
prove it, the nation's
hazardous waste problem was
thought to be extensive enough
to require a major national
effort to bring it under control.
In the six years since
Superfund was enacted, the
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has developed a
comprehensive program to
carry out the complex task of
cleaning up sites contaminated
by hazardous substances. The
Superfund program has also
stimulated advances in the
nation's scientific and
technical capability to reduce
risks to human health and the
environment posed by
uncontrolled hazardous
substances.
This report describes why
and how Superfund came to
be, how it operates, what it has
achieved in its first six years,
and what remains to be done
as the newly reauthorized
progr3m continues its task.
Contents
Introduction
Executive Summary 1
Legislation 1
Progress to Date 1
Developing a National Infrastructure 1
Two Kinds of Response 1
Removal Actions 1
Remedial Actions 1
Enforcement 2
Public Participation 2
Future Direction of the Program 2
Main Report
Section 1:
Legal Requirements and Methodology 4
Legislative Background 4
An Overview of the Process: How Superfund Works 5
Section 2:
The Enforcement Program 7
Section 3:
Removal Actions 8
Section 4:
Remedial Actions 10
Section 5:
Infrastructure Development 15
Conclusion , 16
Glossary 16
Appendices
A: National Priorities List 17
B: Superfund Emergency Response Actions 33
-------
Executive Summary
Legislation
Superfund was created by the
Congress in 1980 with the
passage of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The
Act gave the Federal
government broad authority to
respond to emergencies
involving uncontrolled releases
of hazardous substances, and
to develop long-term solutions
for the nation's most serious
hazardous waste problems. To
pay for this, CERCLA
established a "Superfund" of
$1.6 billion, financed primarily
with a tax on crude oil and
certain chemicals. The tax was
intended to implement the
concept that those responsible
for environmental pollution
should assume the cost. The
legislation also enabled the
Federal government to recover
the costs of its actions from
those responsible for the
problem, or to compel them to
clean up the hazardous site at
their own expense.
Progress
to Date
Developing a National
Infrastructure
To be able to judge the
seriousness of a potential
threat posed by hazardous
substances at a site and to
determine a solution is a
complex task. It requires a
sophisticated infrastructure of
scientific and technological
expertise which simply was
not in place in 1980. One of
Superfund's most important
accomplishments in its first six
years has been the
development of such an
infrastructure. Efforts on the
part of the nation's scientific
and engineering community to
solve the unique problems
presented by Superfund have
resulted in the development of
a wide range of new
techniques for treating and
disposing of hazardous
substances, a greater
understanding of their health
effects, and an expansion of
the nation's laboratory
capacity. In addition, EPA has
developed and continues to
streamline management
procedures and policies for
administering its enormous
new program. Many of these
procedures have served as
models for other Federal, State,
and local programs.
Two Kinds of Response:
Removal and Remedial
Actions
From the beginning, EPA,
which administers the Federal
Superfund program, has
responded to releases or
threatened releases of
hazardous substances on two
levels defined by CERCLA:
prompt actions to respond to
immediate threats to human
health and the environment,
and long-term actions to
address non-emergency, more
complex problems. Removal
actions are undertaken when it
is necessary to respond to a
release within a relatively
short time. Remedial actions
are long-term solutions
developed for the nation's
most hazardous sites. Remedial
actions typically involve the
construction of a waste
handling or treatment facility,
for example, to pump and treat
ground water.
Removal Actions: Response to
Immediate Threats
As of October 1986, removal
actions have been completed at
716 sites by EPA, the U.S.
Coast Guard, and responsible
parties. The Coast Guard
responds to releases of
hazardous substances that
occurred in coastal waters or
inland waterways.
Removal actions entail a
wide variety of activities that
range from relatively simple
solutions, such as packing
leaking drums in new
containers for off-site disposal,
to activities such as hazardous
substance treatment or
disposal, temporary relocation
of citizens, or provision of
alternate water supply.
In some cases, the removal
action serves to protect the
public and the environment
from danger and to stabilize the
contamination until a
long-term solution can be
instituted. In other cases, the
removal action has been
enough to solve the problem.
Remedial Actions: Long-Term
Solutions for Complex
Problems
In six years, more than 25,000
potentially hazardous sites
have been reported to EPA.
Not all will require Federal
attention, but for more than
20,000 sites, EPA and State
agencies have completed a
thorough process of review to
determine if the problems they
posed were serious enough to
merit Superfund action. As of
October 1986, 888 sites were
listed or proposed for listing
by EPA as national priorities
and thereby eligible for
Superfund remedial action. At
nearly 70 percent of the 703
sites with final listing status,
EPA, States, and responsible
parties were conducting
detailed investigations and
engineering studies; at 137
priority sites, EPA and
responsible parties had
committed to fund
construction. And at 14 of the
nation's hazardous sites, EPA
or responsible parties had
completed the work required,
and the site had been removed
from the National Priorities
List.
-------
Enforcement: Finding
Those Responsible
and Making Them Pay
or Clean Up
Superfund's authorities do not
stop with the removal of
barrels or the construction of
treatment facilities. EPA tries
to find the "responsible
parties"—those individuals or
companies responsible for
activities that caused the
hazardous waste problem.
Since many Superfund sites
have been abandoned, this is
no small task. If necessary,
EPA is authorized to take legal
action to recover from
responsible parties the cost of
cleanup already underway or
to force them to clean up the
problem themselves. In the
first six years of Superfund,
EPA identified and notified
more than 13,000 individuals
and companies potentially
responsible for hazardous
wastes dumped at 457 sites. As
of October 1986, EPA had
reached settlement agreements
at 372 sites with responsible
parties, who agreed to pay for
and perform cleanup actions
valued at $619 million. In
addition, EPA had recovered
$37 million for work
performed and financed by
Superfund. In six years, these
enforcement activities have
generated $656 million in
addition to Superfund's $1.6
billion, thereby expanding
Superfund's total resources by
more than 40 percent.
Public Participation in
Decision-making
Superfund was created to solve
a problem that is national in
scope, but extremely localized
in its effects. EPA recognizes
that it is the people in the
community who have had to
live with the problem and who
will be directly affected by the
response action. Therefore,
EPA encourages community
residents to participate in the
process of determining how
best to clean up a hazardous
site.
A community relations
program for two-way
communication is tailored to
the specific needs of the
community. EPA or State staff
develop the program by
interviewing residents, local
officials, and community
leaders to learn all they can
about the site, the community's
most pressing concerns, and
how the community would
like to be involved in the
Superfund response process.
This information is used to
prepare a site-specific
community relations plan for
activities related to the site.
Such activities include
workgroups, briefings, site
tours, fact sheets, and public
meetings. A final decision is
made about a proposed
remedial action only after a
public comment period and
careful consideration of those
comments. In some cases, the
public's involvement has
changed the course of the
Superfund project.
Future
Direction of
the Program
As EPA gained experience
administering Superfund, it
made a number of changes in
policy and management
procedures. Many were
incorporated in legislation
reauthorizing the Superfund
program, approved by the
Congress and signed into law
on October 17, 1986 (the
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986).
New policies and procedures
emphasize the importance of
developing permanent
solutions to hazardous site
problems and of making all
Superfund actions comply
with applicable State and
Federal standards in order to
ensure the protection of the
public health. They also
highlight the States' role in
making decisions regarding
remedial actions and provide
new authority to obtain critic
information about potential
sources of improperly
contained hazardous wastes.
A look at the total number
Superfund actions completed
in the most recent three year;
of the program as compared 1
the first three years shows th
the pace of Superfund activit
has accelerated considerably.
With increased authorities in
the new reauthorization
legislation, and refined
management procedures
developed through six years'
experience, progress will
continue in coming years.
Exhibit 1: Accelerated Pace of Response Actions
Remedial
Action =52
Remedial
Design = 33
Remedial
Investigations/
Feasibility
Studies = 172
Completed
Site
Inspections
= 2,249
Removal
Starts = 196
Completed
Preliminary
Assessments
= 6,294
FY 1981 - FY 1983
Remedial
Action = 85
Remedial
Design = 77
Remedial
Investigations/
Feasibility
Studies = 301
Completed
Site
Inspections
= 4,235
Removal
Starts =612
Completed
Preliminary
Assessments
= 13,729
FY 1984 - FY 1986
Includes CERCLA-financed and Potentially Responsible Party (PRP)
financed actions (PRP actions include number of sites where an
administrative order, consent decree, or consent agreement included
these activities).
Preliminary assessments and site inspections are CERCLA-financed.
Figures for remedial design, remedial actions, and remedial
investigations/ feasibility studies represent starts at sites on the National
Priorities List. Remedial actions include initial remedial measures.
Figures for removal starts represent the number of sites involved in
removal actions; the figures do not reflect multiple removals at one site.
-------
Superfund:
A Six Year Perspective
Before: Drums containing
acids, corrosives, and cyanide
waste at an abandoned plating
facility storage area. EPA and
the State responded to the site,
which presented a potential
threat to public health because
of the possibility of exposure
to contaminated soil and air.
After: This site, which once
burned the feet of local
residents and threatened them
with exposure to toxic gases,
has now been cleaned up for
the community to enjoy.
-------
Section 1: Legal Requirements and Methodology
Legislative Background:
The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
On December 11, 1980, the
United States embarked upon a
new national effort to clean up
hazardous waste sites with the
enactment of legislation known
as the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (CERCLA). This
new law gave the Federal
government authority for the
first time to respond to
emergencies involving releases
of hazardous substances,
whether on land or in
navigable waters. In addition,
authority was available to take
direct action to study, design,
and construct long-term
solutions for the nation's worst
hazardous waste problems. To
pay for this, CERCLA created a
"Superfund" of $1.6 billion,
financed primarily with a tax
on crude oil and 42 different
commercially used chemicals.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), charged with
administering the new
program, was to compile data
on the extent of the nation's
hazardous waste problem and
set priorities so that
Superfund's resources were
spent where they were needed
most. The legislation also
enabled the Federal
government to compel those
responsible for the problem to
clean up the hazardous waste
site at their own expense, or to
recover the costs of Federal
actions.
Prior to the passage of
CERCLA, the Federal
government had only limited
authority to respond to sites
contaminated by hazardous
substances. The Federal Water
Pollution Control Act of 1972
established a fund of $35
million for the cleanup of
hazardous substances and oil
released into navigable waters.
No similar fund existed for
land-based hazardous waste
sites. Another law, the
Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), passed
in 1976, set up a system for
tracking hazardous wastes from
the time they were generated
until disposal. RCRA also
authorized the Federal
government to order those
held responsible to clean up
the hazardous waste problem
they caused. However, nothing
in RCRA authorized the
Federal Government to step in
and clean up the waste if the
person or company held
responsible did not respond, or
could not be found.
By 1980, it was clear that
large numbers of serious
hazardous waste problems
were falling through the cracks
of existing environmental
statutes. A survey requested by
the House Committee on
Interstate and Foreign
Commerce had found that
one-third of the 3,383 waste
disposal sites used since 1950
by the 53 largest U. S.
chemical companies were
outside any Federal regulatory
scheme. Superfund was
intended to fill in these gaps in
existing law.
An abandoned hazardous waste site next to a residential area.
Wastes in the lagoon and storage tanks contaminated surface
and ground water. The site is being cleaned up by EPA and the
State using Superfund.
-------
An Overview of the Process:
How Superfund Works
The Superfund response effort
is guided by the National Oil
and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan,
usually called the National
Contingency Plan (NCP). This
plan outlines the steps that
EPA, the Coast Guard, and
other Federal agencies must
follow in responding to
situations in which hazardous
substances or oil are released
or are likely to be released into
the environment. Thirteen
Federal agencies are members
of the National Response Team
(NRT), which is responsible
for national planning and
coordination of preparedness
and response actions. In
addition to EPA and the Coast
Guard, agencies represented
include the Departments of
Health and Human Services,
Justice, Labor, Defense, Energy,
Interior, Transportation, State,
Agriculture, and Commerce,
the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and the
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
The NCP, which actually
predates Superfund, was
originally written to implement
provisions in the Clean Water
Act having to do with spills of
oil and hazardous substances
into navigable waters. It has
been revised twice: first, to
incorporate the 1980
Superfund program, and then
later, in November 1985, to
streamline the Superfund
process.
The process established by
the NCP for handling
hazardous waste problems is
triggered by identification of
places where a hazardous
waste site might exist. The
process begins with
determining, on a preliminary
basis, whether there is an
emergency requiring
immediate action. If there is,
the next step is to act as
quickly as possible to remove
or stabilize the threat.
Even after the necessary
emergency action has been
taken to control the immediate
threat, in some cases
Exhibit 2: Superfund Flow Chart
October 1986
Removal
Action Starts a
Non-NPL Sites
586
r~
I
Site
Discovery
Site
Inventory
25,194 "
'Preliminary
Assessments
20,023
•Site
Inspections
6,484
National
Priorities List
(INfL)
888
** Remedial
Feasibility
Studies
473
Records of
Decision Signed
178
* 'Remedial
Designs
110
* "Remedial Action
Including
Operations and
Maintenance
143
. . I ..
1
"•National
Priorities List
Deletion
14
-
^
No Further
Federal Response
Action Required
5,476
Removal
Action Starts
at NPL Sites
222
contamination may remain at
the site. A more detailed
analysis of the contamination
may be needed to determine if
further work needs to be done
to find a solution to problems
posed by the site. If long-term
action is deemed necessary, a
decision must be made
regarding the relative national
priority of that particular site.
Next comes an investigation of
the extent of the contamination
and an analysis of the range of
alternative remedial actions
Superfund might take.
Concerns of the local
community are seriously
considered in determining
which alternative to select.
Efforts are also made to find
individuals or companies
responsible for the
contamination and make them
pay for or conduct the cleanup.
After the remedial action has
been selected, it must be
designed and constructed.
Once action has been
completed, the site often must
be monitored and maintained,
a responsibility which is
assumed by the State or
responsible party.
Typically, a Superfund
cleanup action follows this
sequence of events, but not
always. For example, an
emergency requiring
immediate attention can occur
at a site which is already in
the midst of a long-term
remedial action.
At all stages of response,
work can be done by a State or
EPA using Superfund, or by
responsible parties as a result
of enforcement efforts.
The following sections of
this report examine in detail
each step of the
decision-making process which
is followed for both
fund-financed sites and for
enforcement-lead sites where
EPA negotiates with
responsible parties. The
number of actions cited in this
report reflect results of both
activities.
* Completions.
** Includes fund-financed and responsible party financed actions started
at NPL sites; includes Federal facilities. Remedial action includes Initial
Remedial Measures.
**'Includes Butler Tunnel site, which was restored to the NPL.
NOTE: A removal action may be taken at any stage in the process.
-------
Identifying Sites
Some of the more serious sites
were already known when EPA
began to gear up the Superfund
program. Soon after the
enactment of the Superfund
law, EPA was aware of about
9,000 sites suspected to be
contaminated with hazardous
substances. Many of these sites
were discovered as a result of
reports filed by those who
transported, stored, or
disposed of hazardous wastes,
and were therefore legally
required to notify the proper
authorities, either EPA or the
Coast Guard, of their
operations. Other sites were
identified as a result of reports
from State and local authorities
and alert citizens who noticed
some suspicious disposal
aciivity. In 1986 alone, EPA
and the Coast Guard received
over 2,700 notifications of
hazardous substances releases.
EPA also makes an effort to
identify potential hazardous
sites that might otherwise go
unreported. One way EPA
accomplishes this is to identify
all facilities in certain
industries that manufacture or
work routinely with toxic
chemicals.
By October 1986, EPA had
learned of more than 25,000
possible hazardous sites. And
new sites are still being
identified. All reports of
CERCLIS - National Priorities List Sites as of 9/30/86
703 finalized NPL sites +
185 proposed NPL sites X
888 total NPL sites
Guam-l +
potential sites are entered into
the Superfund site inventory, a
computerized data base called
"CERCLIS" (Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability
Information System). Exhibit 3
shows the total number of
reported sites contained in
CERCLIS for each year since
the beginning of Superfund.
An average of 2,800 sites have
been added each year.
Exhibit 3: Potential Sites in EPA's Inventory
(Cumulative)
25194
Setting Priorities
The cost of a full-scale
remedial action at a hazardous
waste site has been
considerable. To date, total
remedial costs at sites where
construction work has been
started have averaged $6.1
million per site. These costs
have ranged from a low of
$300 thousand to a high of
$34.6 million.
To ensure that Superfund
monies were spent on the most
serious problems, and to avoid
exhausting the fund on an
individual site, Congress
required EPA to identify the
most serious sites first, focus
its efforts on those sites, and
take into account the many
other sites in need of attention
when deciding how much to
spend on any particular one.
After a thorough evaluation,
the most serious hazardous
waste sites in the country are
identified and, through a
rulemaking process requiring
public comment, are placed on
the National Priorities List
(NPL). Only NPL sites are
eligible for long-term remedial
response using Superfund
money. Sites are proposed for
Puerto Rico-8 +
the NPL approximately three
times per year. As of October
1986, there were 888 proposed
and final sites on the list.
It should be noted that whei
an emergency occurs which
poses an immediate threat to
public health or to the
environment, EPA can and wil
respond, whether or not the
hazardous site has been
classified as a "national
priority."
FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY1986
Information derived from CERCLIS, EPA's computerized inventory of
potential hazardous waste sites.
-------
Section 2:
The Enforcement Program
The Superfund statute gives
EPA a choice when faced with
a serious hazardous waste
problem. It gives the agency
authority to take direct action
to clean up the site and later
attempt to recover the cost of
its action from those
individuals or companies
responsible. It also permits
EPA to take legal action to
compel the "responsible
parties" to pay for and perform
cleanup of the site themselves.
In such cases, the responsible
parties follow the same process
as EPA follows, but they have
hired their own contractors to
do the work. At each stage of
the process, responsible party
decisions and construction of
the remedy have been subject
to EPA oversight and approval.
Before EPA begins a
remedial action, it informs the
responsible parties of its plans
and gives them the opportunity
to undertake the work.
Sometimes companies have
been willing to take the
initiative to clean up their sites
and have negotiated an
agreement with EPA under
which the company undertakes
the work. In other cases, EPA's
lawyers and enforcement staff,
working with the Department
of Justice (DOJ), have had to
bring legal action against the
responsible parties.
EPA refers cases to DOJ,
which conducts judicial
actions to compel private party
cleanup under section 106 of
CERCLA , or actions for cost
recovery under section 107.
DOJ has filed civil actions for
91 sites under section 106,
seeking action by potentially
responsible parties, and civil
actions for 117 sites to recover
$172 million in response costs
under section 107. DOJ also
participates in settlement
negotiations for CERCLA
cleanups. In addition, DOJ is
responsible for defending the
Agency in actions brought
against it by private parties.
CERCLA gives EPA several
legal methods for compelling
responsible parties to assume
financial responsibility for the
hazardous waste cleanup.
Under section 106, EPA can
issue an "administrative order"
to compel a responsible party
to clean up a site where there
may be an imminent and
substantial threat to human
health or the environment. An
administrative order
summarizes the terms of a
cleanup agreement, including
sampling requirements,
cleanup techniques, and
timetables. EPA either
negotiates the administrative
order with the responsible
party, or develops the order
and issues it on its own. EPA
has issued 408 administrative
orders since the beginning of
the Superfund program. If
violated, these orders may be
enforced by the courts.
EPA, through DOJ, may ask a
Federal district court to require
the responsible party to
respond to any threat posed by
a site. The court may also
agree to issue a "consent
decree," based upon
negotiations between EPA and
the responsible party. A
consent decree also provides
for long-term EPA oversight of
a cleanup action managed by
the responsible party.
EPA also has the option, as
noted, to use Superfund money
and then to recover cleanup
costs from the responsible
party. Under CERCLA, courts
can hold certain past and
present owners and operators
of a site, as well as waste
generators and transporters,
liable for complete cleanup
costs.
In the first six years of
Superfund, EPA identified and
notified more than 13,000
individuals and companies
potentially responsible for
hazardous substances at 457
sites. As of October 1986, EPA
had reached settlement
agreements at 372 sites with
responsible parties who agreed
to pay for and perform cleanup
actions valued at $619 million.
In addition, EPA had recovered
$37 million for work
performed and financed by
Superfund. In six years, these
enforcement activities have
generated $656 million in
addition to Superfund's $1.6
billion in tax revenues, thereby
expanding Superfund's total
resources by more than 40
percent.
Enforcement efforts have been
critical to the Superfund
program because the cost of
cleaning up all the serious
hazardous sites in the country
far exceeds Superfund's
resources. The role of
responsible parties in
conducting Superfund
cleanups has been important
and can be expected to
continue to grow.
The following example
illustrates many of the
complex issues addressed by
the enforcement program.
Western Processing,
Kent, Washington
The Western Processing site
was first brought to public
attention when several fires
broke out at the site in the
early 1970's. Operations at the
13 acre facility included heavy
metal and waste solvent
recovery, acid and caustic
neutralization, and pickle
liquor reprocessing.
Over the course of the next
15 years, the site was the
subject of numerous
investigations, cleanup
measures and enforcement
activities. Inihe fall of 1982,
EPA conducted its first major
^ield investigation of the site
and confirmed the presence of
widespread contamination of
soils on-site, of ground water
underlying the site, and of
surface water and isediments
in nearby Mill Creek. Based on
this information EPA
conducted an immediate
removal, removing over
920,000 gallons and 1,900
cubic yards of the most
hazardous substances in order
to stabilize the site and prevent
further environmental
degradation. EPA then began
work on a comprehensive
study to define the extent of
an-ske and off-site
contamination. At the same
time, EPA negotiated a consent
decree with over 190
potentially responsible parties
(PRPs) to undertake a more
thorough surface cleanup and
implement stormwater control
measures.
Upon completion of the
remedial investigation and
feasibility study, EPA entered
into negotiations with the PRPs
for the second stage of
cleanup to address the
contaminated soil, Mill Creek
sediments and ground water.
Negotiations proved successful .
in June of 1986, when the
responsible parties signed a
consent decree requiring them
to conduct extensive soil
sampling and analysis and
then to excavate highly
contaminated areas on-site and
any off-site soils contaminated
above federally allowed levels.
The off-site areas will then be
capped and maintained. The
agreement also included the
construction of a ground water
extraction system and
treatment plant. The goals of
the system are to prevent
further discharges of
contaminated ground water
into Mill Creek at levels
harmful to aquatic organisms,
and to prevent and remove, to
the extent possible,
contamination from the
shallow aquifer under the site.
After seven years of operation
the system will be evaluated,
with the defendants agreeing to
perform additional work
needed to meet the desired
goals and to cap and maintain
the site. Additionally, the plan
calls for excavation of
contaminated sediments from
Mill Creek, management of
stormwater-and a long-term,
ground water monitoring
program to evaluate the
remedy.
-------
Section 3: Removal Actions
IVAGE0
Protective fencing and repacking drum protect the public from
immediate exposure to hazardous substances.
EPA Superfund personnel play
a key role in responding to
emergencies and other
"time-critical" situations
involving the potential release
of hazardous substances. Since
the beginning of the Superfund
program, EPA and Coast Guard
On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs)
and responsible parties have
initiated response activities at
over 800 sites to clean up or to
mitigate the effects of
hazardous substances on
human health and the
environment. The U.S. Coast
Guard has responded under
CERCLA authority to releases
of hazardous substances that
have occurred in coastal waters
and inland waterways.
Nearly 90 percent of these
actions have been completed.
This includes 133 sites not on
the NPL which have been
stabilized but which may
require additional work.
Exhibit 4 illustrates the
increasing volume of removal
actions taken by EPA and the
Coast Guard over the first six
years of the Superfund
program.
While some removal actions
are emergency responses
lasting only a few days or
weeks, many are more complex
and may last for several
months or even years in
certain circumstances. These
responses are still "time
critical" but require more
extensive efforts to clean up or
reduce threats to human health
and the environment.
CERCLA limited the cost and
duration of removal actions to
$1 million and six months
except in special
circumstances warranting a
waiver. New legislation,
effective October 17, 1986,
raised these limits to $2
million and 12 months to
cover larger and more
complex, but still time-critical,
removal actions.
A national network is in
place to coordinate rapid
response to all reports of
hazardous releases. Releases of
hazardous substances should
be reported to the National
Response Center (NRG),
located in Washington, B.C.,
although reports may be
received by EPA Regional
Offices or U.S. Coast Guard
units located thioughout the
country. EPA and U.S. Coast
Guard OSCs are on call 24
hours a day to respond to
reports of releases Lhat may
require a CERCLA-funded
removal action.
CERCLA requires
notification of the NRG
whenever a hazardous
substance is released in an
amount considered a potential
threat to human health or the
environment (the Reportable
Quantity or RQ established by
EPA for the substance
released). EPA has established
Reportable Quantities for over
400 substances and is currently
developing RQs for an
additional 275 substances.
Releases of hazardous
substances are reported by
responsible parties, the general
public, State and local
authorities, and Federal
agencies. When it receives a
report of a release, the NRG
alerts the appropriate EPA
Regional or U.S. Coast Guard
district On-Scene Coordinator,
who notifies State response
authorities.
In compliance with the NCP,
the OSC conducts a
preliminary assessment of the
release before a
CERCLA-financed removal can
be initiated. Data from the
preliminary assessment is usec
to determine whether the
situation poses a threat to
public health or the
environment. Preliminary
assessment activities may
include site visits, sampling of
hazardous materials, personal
interviews, and investigations
to identify potentially
responsible parties. From the
information gathered during
the preliminary assessment,
the OSC determines whether o
not a CERCLA-financed
removal is necessary.
EPA conducts removal
actions in response to releases
of hazardous substances at
NPL sites in addition to
responding to other releases.
For example, a removal may bi
required to stabilize an NPL
site before remedial action
begins or to respond to a
sudden dangerous situation,
such as fire or explosion,
occurring during a long-term
cleanup action.
Exhibit 4:
Removal Actions
700
600
500
400
300
200
612
196
FY 1981-1983 FY 1984-FY 1981
Includes CERCLA-financed a
PRP-financed removal action
starts.
PRP-financed actions include
the number of sites where an
administrative order, consent
decree, or consent agreement
included removal actions.
-------
Measures used in the course
of a removal action, either to
eliminate or reduce the threat
to human health and the
environment, include but are
not limited to:
• Treating contaminated
substances on site to detoxify
or destroy hazardous
compounds;
• Excavating contaminated
soil and transporting the soil
offsite for disposal;
• Pumping contaminated
materials from lagoons;
• Providing an alternate water
supply via bottled water or
residential hookups to a
municipal water system, when
wells used for drinking water
are contaminated;
• Placing drums, barrels, or
tanks of hazardous substances
in special packing containers
to control leaking and to allow
for their safe transportation to
a disposal area;
• Installing temporary barriers
or digging ditches to control
the migration of hazardous
substances after a spill and
then collecting and disposing
of the spilled material;
• Temporarily relocating
nearby residents, which
involves coordination with
the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA).
Removal actions are
conducted in response to a
wide range of different types of
incidents including inactive
waste sites, illegal disposal or
midnight dumps, active
manufacturing or waste
disposal facilities, and
transportation-related
incidents. Exhibit 5 shows
removal actions taken recently
by EPA and the U.S. Coast
Guard in response to these and
other types of incidents. Most
actions were taken at inactive
waste sites and in response to
midnight dumps. For example,
in 1985, nearly 50 percent of
all actions were taken at
inactive waste sites and 27
percent of the actions were in
response to midnight dumps.
Only 3 percent of the
responses were transportation
related.
In 1985, EPA and the U.S.
Coast Guard completed
removal actions at 140 sites.
Sixty-five of these actions
entailed site cleanups, while
75 were initiated to stabilize
site conditions. Of the 140
completed actions, 134
involved measures to control
the source of contamination.
These measures included
repacking drums in leakproof
containers, pumping down
lagoons or containment areas,
and neutralizing materials. In
addition, contaminated soils
were excavated at 61 sites in
1985, and an alternate water
supply was provided in 25
cases. Temporary relocation
was required in 6 cases.
The following examples
illustrate the kinds of
situations Superfund removal
actions are intended to address
and the scope of activities
undertaken to respond to
threats to public health and the
environment.
Interstate 70 Acid Spill
Near Wheeling, West
Virginia (January 1984)
A truck carrying a
40,000-pound load of bottled
concentrated acids crashed on
a major interstate, spilling
hazardous substances. Toxic
fumes were generated by the
interaction of the acids,
endangering nearby schools,
residences, and a trout stream.
Although the trucking firm
assumed responsibility for site
cleanup, the EPA On-Scene
Coordinator deemed the
responsible party's action
inadequate given the urgency
of the situation, which
included severe weather
conditions. A
CERCLA-financed response
was promptly conducted, the
threat expeditiously
eliminated, and the site
completely cleaned up.
Measures taken in response to
the incident included isolating
incompatible chemicals which
posed threat of explosion if
mixed, and repacking damaged
containers for disposal. Acids
spilled on the ground and near
a drain leading to a stream
were neutralized to prevent
further damage, and
contaminated soil was
excavated for proper disposal.
Dioxin Contamination at
a Trailer Park in
Franklin County,
Missouri (May 1983)
A trailer park containing 32
occupied units was discovered
to be contaminated with
dioxin, an extremely toxic
substance. Investigators found
significant levels of dioxin on
roads, in yards and garden
areas, and inside at least one
mobile home. Temporary
relocation of 29 households
was immediately arranged and
actions were started to
decontaminate affected mobile
homes. Hundreds of soil and
dust samples were analyzed to
determine the extent of the
contamination and a study was
conducted to identify further
long-term response options.
Exhibit 5: Characteristics of Removal Actions
Extensive soil excavation was
involved in cleaning up areas
surrounding the mobile home
site and site restoration is
currently underway.
Tire Fire at an Inactive
Waste Management
Facility in Winchester,
Virginia (October 1983)
A pile of tires in a four- to
five-acre ravine caught fire in
October 1983. The fire,
attributed to arson, involved
five to seven million tires and
resulted in a potentially toxic
smoke plume several thousand
feet high, trailing fifty miles
and crossing four states. There
were also significant quantities
of liquid runoff, and suspected
contamination of the ground
water.
EPA responded immediately
to provide assistance to the
State. The fire continued to
smolder during the removal
action, complicating response
activities. A total of 735,000
gallons of pure tar product was
removed and sold to a recycler.
An environmental assessment
report and a ground
water/subsurface study showed
that the ground water was not
contaminated, but a monitoring
well was installed for
continuing surveillance. The
pumping of the remaining oil
was completed in March 1984
and the final site restoration
was completed by the property
owner, and monitored by the
State and county governments.
Types of Situations
Original Use of Facility
Inactive Waste Sites
55% (195)
Other 4% (14)
'Transportation 3% (11)
£ther 2% (7)
vTransfer
3% (9)
FY 1984-FY 1985
FY 1984-FY 1985
-------
Section 4: Remedial Actions
EPA, in partnership with the
States, takes the Federal lead
in remedial response actions,
coordinating its activities with
the 13 Federal agencies
involved in the NRT. The
agencies most often called
upon are the Federal
Emergency Management
Agency, the Department of
Health and Human Services,
and the Department of Justice.
EPA has encouraged States
to take an active role in all
facets of the Superfund
program and has provided
funds for that purpose. Many
States have responded and
have assumed responsibility
for conducting or overseeing
cleanup. As of October 1986,
all States have completed
initial site evaluations
(Preliminary Assessments and
Site Inspections) at over 12,000
sites. States have taken the
lead for conducting detailed
planning or design and
construction work at 147 sites.
Additionally, States such as
New York, New Jersey,
Michigan, California, and
Illinois and others have created
programs similar to Superfund
and are addressing sites not
expected to be a high priority
for cleanup using the Federal
Superfund.
Steps Leading
to Long-Term
Remedial
Action
The next few paragraphs
describe the way EPA and
States evaluate and rank the
thousands of potential
hazardous site problems which
are reported, not as
emergencies, but as situations
which could pose long-range
threats to the environment and
people living nearby.
Preliminary Assessments
The first step after learning of
a site is to obtain and review
all available reports and
documentation about the site.
These "preliminary
assessments" are conducted by
EPA and by State personnel. In
fact, about 80 percent of
preliminary assessments
conducted from 1983 through
1986 were conducted by States
using primarily Federal funds.
As of October 1986,
preliminary assessments had
been conducted at 20,023 of
the 25,194 sites in EPA's
inventory.
By examining written
materials, and often by making
telephone calls to persons in
the locality familiar with the
site, EPA and States have
determined that about
two-thirds of the reports
contained in CERCLIS did not
require any further action. For
those sites there was no
indication of a threat to public
health or the environment, or a
report had already been
received and addressed under
some other name.
The amount of
documentation available on
potential Superfund sites has
varied greatly. For example, if
the site was once a licensed
waste treatment or disposal
facility, chances are good that
substantial documentation
exists to give clues regarding
what substances were
deposited there and who was
responsible. On the other
hand, if a local resident reports
that a tank truck was seen
discharging its liquid contents
by the side of the road,
documentation is difficult
unless EPA or State
investigators can determine
who owned the truck and what
it might have contained.
Site Inspections
If the preliminary assessment
indicates a suspected release of
hazardous substances which
Exhibit 6: CERCLIS* Sites (%) with Preliminary
Assessments Completed (Cumulative)
Fund-Financed Actions
FY 1981-1983
(Total CERCLIS = 16,309)
FY 1984-1986
(Total CERCLIS = 25,194)
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Information System
may threaten human health 01
the environment, EPA then
orders an inspection. The
purpose of the site inspection
is to see the site first-hand am
learn enough to rank the site
for placement on the NPL.
Although a major effort, the
site inspection is not expected
to provide all the information
which will eventually be
required if a remedial action i
undertaken.
By October 1986, over 6000
site inspections had been
completed by EPA or by State
agencies using primarily
Federal funds. The pace of
these inspections was
significantly increased in 1984
and about 1,600 site
inspections were conducted ir
1985 alone. Exhibit 7 shows
the increasing number of
preliminary assessments and
site inspections which have
been conducted, particularly i
recent years. The volume of
site inspection work is large
enough to employ Federally
funded contractors
nationwide—as many as 60 in
Chicago, for instance —who
work full-time on inspecting
reported sites.
In preparation tor inspecting
a site, the team reviews all the
documentation already
obtained about the site. Then ;
work plan is prepared,
specifying every sample that
will be collected for testing
and the procedures that will b
followed to ensure the safety c
anyone working at the site,
assuming the presence of
dangerous chemicals. Usually
three people visit a site to
conduct the inspection,
traveling in a van equipped
with sampling and safety
equipment. People working on
the site normally wear
protective gear. To take
samples of ground water
beneath the site, several small
wells often have to be drilled.
Soil, surface water, and stream
sediment samples are more
easily collected. If there are
open drums of wastes lying on
the ground, or lagoons of
liquid wastes, samples are
taken of their contents. The
average inspection requires
taking ten to twelve samples.
Each carefully labelled sample
is sent to a laboratory for
analysis.
10
-------
In addition to sampling,
inspections include a
reconnaissance of the site's
layout and terrain in order to
document all buildings or
structures, access roads, the
location of nearby residences,
and anything else needed to
determine the risks the site
may pose. If the inspection
indicates a strong potential for
a fire or explosion, EPA
immediately takes emergency
action.
The results of these
inspections are used to
determine which sites to place
on the NPL. NPL sites are
eligible for long-term remedial
response actions using
Superfund money. In order to
rank the sites and set
priorities, EPA and the States
use a special scoring system
called the Hazard Ranking
System which takes into
consideration the types and
quantities of wastes at the site,
the extent of contamination
that has already occurred,
especially of ground water, and
the numbers of people living
or working near the site who
could be exposed to hazardous
chemicals escaping from it.
Exhibit 7: Site
Investigations Completed
4235
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
FY 1981-1983 FY 1984-1986
Fund-Financed Actions
Remedial
Actions
A priority site can be cleaned
up in several ways:
• The responsible party can
clean it up voluntarily.
• The State or local
government can choose to
assume all, or almost all, of the
responsibility to clean it up
without use of the Trust Fund.
• The responsible party may
be forced to clean it up by
legal action.
• The Trust Fund may be used
by EPA or by States under a
cooperative agreement to
finance the cleanup. If there
are problems in getting the
responsible party to act, EPA
will proceed under Superfund
and seek later to recover costs
by legal action.
There are currently 888 sites
listed or proposed for listing
on the NPL. Every site on the
list is eligible for a remedial
response action through the
Superfund program. Remedial
responses are full-scale efforts
intended to provide permanent
solutions to the problems at
these sites.
Of the hundreds of sites
identified as national
priorities, EPA and the States
have chosen to begin work first
on those sites where
preliminary work was most
advanced, where the problem
was best understood, and
where the State government
was quickly able to contribute
its required share of the costs.
As of October 1986, detailed
investigation and planning for
remedial work had begun on
473 national priority sites (see
Exhibit 8). In many cases, EPA
has undertaken the work;
however, States and private
responsible parties have also
conducted Superfund remedial
response actions under
agreements with EPA. EPA has
secured private responsible
party response valued at $502
million at 208 priority sites as
of October 1986.
As of October 1986, 29 States
had signed cooperative
agreements covering work at
160 sites using $199 million in
Federal funds. Under a
cooperative agreement the
State takes the lead role. EPA
continues to be substantially
involved, monitoring the
State's progress throughout the
project. EPA encourages
cooperative agreements
because they allow maximum
State participation, which is
essential to the success of
remedial actions under
Superfund. Whether EPA or a
State has the lead for cleanup
of a site, CERCLA has required
the state:
• To contribute 10 percent of
the remedial action cost for
sites that were privately owned
at the time of disposal of
hazardous substances and at
least 50 percent of all response
costs on sites that were owned
by the State.
• To finance operation and
maintenance costs, except for
an initial period, when EPA
will share in the cost to certify
that the remedy actually
functions as planned.
• To assure that approved
facilities are available to treat,
store, or dispose of any
hazardous substances
transported from the site.
The kinds of remedial
actions have varied greatly, as
have the particular problems
posed by each site. The
following examples describe
Superfund sites in different
parts of the country which have
presented a wide range of
problems and have required very
different kinds of responses.
Biscayne Aquifer
The Biscayne Aquifer is the
sole source of drinking water
for 700,000 residents of
southeastern Florida. Three
hazardous waste sites,
considered national priorities,
have contaminated this crucial
aquifer. The affected area
covers 80 square miles.
One of the sites, Miami
Drum Services, a chemical
waste recycling facility, was
the source of corrosives,
solvents, phenols, and toxic
metals which had saturated the
soil at the site. Another Miami
hazardous waste site which
threatens the aquifer is located
at the Miami International
Airport where, in 1968, an
underground pipeline leak
resulted in the discharge of
about 1.6 million gallons of
Varsol (a petroleum solvent).
Shortly after the leak was
discovered, concrete walls
were installed to contain the
solvent, which remained
floating on top of that portion
of the aquifer underlying the
airport. The third major site
contaminating the aquifer is a
municipal landfill, operated by
Dade County, from which
metals such as lead, arsenic,
and chromium have leached
into the ground water.
A number of remedial
actions have been or will be
taken to clean up this complex
problem. Remedial action was
conducted at the Miami Drum
site in 1982, during which the
State and Dade County, under
a cooperative agreement with
EPA, removed thousands of
cubic yards of contaminated
soil and treated half a million
gallons of ground water. EPA
also conducted a detailed
study to determine how the
plume of contaminated ground
water was migrating from the
site. In addition to these
actions, a plan is being put
into effect at the county level
to protect the aquifer from
waste generated by local
residents and small businesses.
Exhibit 8: Remedial
Study Starts as a
Proportion of NPL Sites
(Cumulative)
1000
900
800
888
FY 1981-1983 FY 1984-1986
'Includes enforcement figures for
number of Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study
starts, which includes number of
NPL sites where an administrative
order, consent decree, or consent
agreement includes an RI/FS in the
remedy.
11
-------
The Sylvester Dump Site
in Nashua, New
Hampshire
One of the first Superfund sites
to be addressed began as a
six-acre sand-borrow pit in
Nashua, New Hampshire. After
all the sand had been removed,
the owner began an illegal
waste disposal operation.
Household refuse, demolition
materials, chemical sludges,
and hazardous liquid
chemicals all went into the pit,
and eventually contaminated
the ground water. The plume
of contamination moved
through the ground water
toward Lyle Reed Brook,
which ultimately contributes to
the Merrimack River, a source
of drinking water.
In this case, the initial1 cause
of the contamination covered
six acres, but the Superfund
site encompassed 20 acres,
because of the ground water
contamination. A series of
remedial actions were carried
out at the site between August
1981 and April 1986 to arrest
the contaminated ground water
plume and treat it in order to
remove hazardous pollutants.
First the State, using Federal
funds, installed a temporary
system to pump and
recirculate the ground water to
keep the contaminated plume
from spreading toward the
brook. Also, a municipal
waterline had to be installed
and later extended to serve
residents whose wells had
been, or could soon be,
contaminated. Meanwhile, a
slurry wall and cap to
encompass the entire 20 acre
site were designed and
constructed, as was a ground
water treatment plant, which
has been operating since April
1986. The contaminated
ground water, now contained,
will continue to be treated
until at least 1988. To date, the
Sylvester site has cost close to
$10.7 million to remedy. In
1980, two individuals involved
in the illegal disposal activity
were convicted and sentenced
in State ciiminal court. EPA is
actively engaged in
enforcement negotiations to
recover costs of site cleanup.
How A
Remedial
Action
Is Carried Out
Each NPL site presents a
unique set of problems and
< ircumstances. There is no
single prescribed solution for
hazardous waste sites.
Developing a workable,
permanent solution for a major
hazardous waste problem
requires care at each stage of
the process: investigating the
scope of the contamination at
the site, studying the feasibility
of various possible remedies,
deciding upon which remedial
action to undertake, and
finally, designing, building,
and operating the facilities and
structures which will remedy
the problem. At some sites
EPA takes the lead in
conducting the work; at other
sites the States or private
parties take the lead.
The Remedial
Investigation
At the start of each remedial
action, EPA conducts a
comprehensive investigation of
the site. Like the initial site
inspection described earlier,
this involves an examination of
site data in order to better
define the problem. The
remedial investigation is much
more detailed and
comprehensive than the initial
site inspection, however. The
remedial investigation is
designed to define fully the
extent of the problem and to
provide information needed to
develop and evaluate cleanup
alternatives. The following
example describes how
thorough such remedial
Drilling one of a series of sampling wells to discover possible
pathways of contamination, which may threaten public health or
the environment.
investigations often must be.
The Taylor Borough site in
Lackawanna County,
Pennsylvania, was an
abandoned coal strip mine that
was later used as a municipal
landfill. Strip mining
operations left the 125-acre site
with numerous open pits and
piles of excavated rock.
Municipal waste from many
sources had been dumped into
the pits, which were then
covered by the excavated rock.
Ponds formed in a number of
the pits during rainy periods.
After municipal waste disposal
at the site ended in 1968,
many drums were found on
the surface of the site, which
were later discovered to
contain a variety of hazardous
chemicals including benzene,
toluene, and polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons.
Possible human health effects
associated with exposure to
these compounds include both
carcinogenic and
non-carcinogenic effects.
EPA removed about 1,200
drums as an emergency
response after some caught fire
during a 1983 brush fire. The
site was three miles from the
city of Scranton. A new
residential development was
within 600 feet of one of the
areas where the drums of
hazardous substances had been
found.
EPA conducted a series of
studies in order to understand
the scope of the problem at
this site. First, EPA needed to
know the extent of the
contamination and the kinds of
chemical contaminants.
Information collected during
the removal action was useful,
but a more complete picture of
the problem was necessary if a
complete remedy was to be
performed. More than one
hundred soil samples were
taken and analyzed, as were
thirty-five ground water
samples, seventeen samples of
water from a stream and ponds
at the site, and eighteen
samples of sediments from the
stream. A geophysical survey
was conducted to identify
buried materials and to
delineate the boundaries of the
strip mine pits where wastes
had been buried. The survey
indicated that drums might be
buried at the site; to search for
them, investigators excavated
12
-------
Excavation of buried drums and contaminated soil.
Covering excavated soil and barrels to reduce air-borne exposure
to contaminated particles.
twenty-one test pits, each
about ten feet deep. To
understand the extent of
subsurface contamination at
the site, EPA's contractors
drilled nine exploratory
borings and installed 25
monitoring wells, which were
also used to collect ground
water samples. While other
studies were underway, the air
at the site was also tested
continuously for toxic
emissions.
These field studies revealed
that in those areas in which
the drums had been stored,
there was significant
contamination. Water and
sediment in certain ponds
were also contaminated. While
the shallow ground water did
not show signs of
contamination, the deep
underlying ground water did.
EPA now had the information
it needed to develop some
alternative solutions to the
problems posed by the site.
The Feasibility Study
EPA develops more than one
possible remedial action
alternative for Superfund sites,
and carefully compares the
advantages and disadvantages
of each approach. These
analyses of alternatives are
called "feasibility studies." In
analyzing the alternative
courses of action possible at a
site, EPA must take cost and
technological factors into
consideration, as well as the
need to consider relevant State
and Federal health and
environmental standards.
Scientific uncertainty
complicates this process.
Because scientists simply do
not yet know a great deal about
the health effects of many of
the chemicals found at
Superfund sites, it is
sometimes difficult to gauge
what action is necessary to
adequately protect people from
health risks associated with
nearby hazardous waste.
Another complicating factor is
the extent to which each site is
unique, in terms of both its
physical characteristics and
pathways of exposure to the
specific hazardous substances
involved.
For the Taylor Borough site,
thirteen alternative courses of
action were evaluated,
including the option of taking
no action. The other
alternatives combined in
different ways two basic
technologies: 1) removing
contaminated material and 2)
capping the surface of the
contamination with soil or
clay, regrading or revegetating
the surface, and building
diversions for rain water. One
alternative, for instance, was to
excavate a portion of the
contaminated materials,
dispose of them on the site,
and cover the site with a soil
cap; the cost of this alternative
was estimated at $3.4 million.
Another alternative involved
removing all contaminated
materials to be treated and
disposed of elsewhere at a
permitted disposal facility and
covering with a clay cap each
area where drums had been
stored; the cost of this
alternative was estimated at
$11.1 million.
The evaluation of the
remedial alternatives
considered for this site, as for
any other site, had to follow
guidelines presented in the
NCP. The main evaluation
criteria have been 1) the
effectiveness of the alternative
in protecting public health and
the environment; 2) the degree
of permanence of the remedy
and its ability to prevent or
minimize the release of
hazardous substances; 3) the
feasibility and reliability of the
engineering techniques or
technologies involved; 4) the
cost; 5) whether alternative
technologies would be used,
such as waste recycling; 6)
whether the remedy would
attain legally applicable or
relevant and appropriate
Federal requirements; and 7)
whether the action under
consideration would have any
adverse impact on the
environment and, if so,
whether it could be mitigated.
As a general rule, an
alternative that can provide the
same protection as another, but
at less cost, is the preferred
alternative.
The magnitude of the
Superfund program is evident
when one considers that the
Taylor Borough site was just
one of 473 priority sites for
which EPA had begun, by
October 1986, the detailed
planning required for remedial
response. In fact, this site was
relatively straightforward,
compared to many other
Superfund sites.
On average, remedial
investigations and feasibility
studies have cost $850,000;
this cost is expected to be
higher in the future as the
analyses of more permanent
remedies involving alternative
and innovative technologies
are undertaken. A total of 171
samples were collected in the
investigation of the Taylor
Borough site. Each sample
required careful analysis using
sophisticated equipment such
as gas chromatograph/ mass
spectrometers, which identify
the molecular composition and
concentrations of the various
chemicals in each sample. As
of October 1986, over 260,000
samples had been taken and
analyzed during investigations
of national priority sites, for a
cost of over $102 million.
Average cost of a sample can
range from $145 to $760
depending on the type of
sample. The analysis of these
samples has required the
development of advanced
13
-------
laboratory techniques capable
of detecting the presence of
very complicated mixtures of
toxic contaminants in
extremely low concentrations.
This extensive planning
effort does not, in itself, solve
hazardous waste problems, but
it is a crucial part of the
solution. Learning to more
effectively identify and assess
hazardous waste problems in
order to find suitable solutions
is one of the major
accomplishments of the
Superfund program.
Deciding Upon a Course
of Action
The EPA Regional Offices and
States transmit their
recommendations for action to
the Assistant Administrator for
Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. The decision
document is called a Record of
Decision (ROD). In selecting
the remedial alternative, EPA
must determine the
appropriate extent of remedy.
Also, EPA must consider the
CERCLA requirement to
balance the need to protect
public health, welfare, and the
environment at a specific site
against the availability of Fund
monies to respond to other
sites, taking into account the
need for immediate action.
In addition to the criteria
mentioned above, EPA takes
into consideration the views of
the local community before
making a final decision
regarding which remedial
action alternative will be
employed at a site. In several
cases, remedial plans have
been adjusted in mid-course to
reflect the preferences of local
residents.
At the Lang Property Site in
New Jersey, for example,
where municipal wells had
been contaminated, farmers
and other members of the
community worked closely
with EPA in its efforts to clean
up the site. When Lang
Property owners removed
several hundred contaminated
drums from the site without
documenting where these
drums had been disposed,
members of the community
suggested several places within
the community where the
drums were most likely to have
been dumped. This involvement
by the community greatly
facilitated EPA's investigation
of the site and enhanced EPA
efforts in cleaning up the site.
Exhibit 9: Site Samples Analyzed for Remedial
Investigations/Feasibility Studies
70
60
50
40
71000
71000
is
2 30
20
10
5000
1500
••i
FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 1986
Designing and
Constructing the Cleanup
Once a specific course of
action has been selected for a
site, it must be designed in
detail and then carried out.
These stages of the cleanup are
called "remedial design" and
"remedial action." At this
point, for sites where it has the
lead, EPA turns over the
management of the cleanup
action to the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, which has
long-term experience with
major construction projects.
The Corps of Engineers then
hires its own contractors to
perform the work. EPA Regional
Project Managers provide
environmental oversight. States
and responsible parties continue
to manage the design and
construction of those
Superfund actions for which
they have lead responsibility.
Remedial action projects may
appear to be like any other
major construction project, but
in fact, the likely presence of
dangerous chemicals demands
special construction planning
and procedures.
As of October 1986, remedial
design work had been funded
at 110 priority sites, by
CERCLA or by responsible
parties as a result of EPA
enforcement efforts. At 137
priority sites, commitments
have been made for remedial
actions financed by CERCLA or
by responsible parties. At six
priority sites, construction has
been completed and operation
of control systems is
underway. In addition, EPA,
States, and responsible parties
have begun design work at 12
sites and construction
activities at 19 sites, which
were not on the National
Priorities List.
In recent years, EPA has
accelerated the pace of
planning for site cleanup. As a
result, we can expect an
increase in the number of sites
in the final stages of the
cleanup process as the
comprehensive investigation
phase is completed at more
and more sites, allowing
design and construction work
to begin.
The work involved in
designing and constructing a
cleanup can be illustrated by
the specifications for the
Re-Solve, Inc., site in
Dartmouth, Massachusetts. The
remedy selected required
clearing the site, constructing
access roads, relocating
existing fencing, providing
temporary utilities, excavating
and solidifying 3,500 cubic
yards of liquid wastes in
lagoons, and excavating 3,200
cubic yards of contaminated
soil. The excavated materials
had to be transported for
proper disposal elsewhere.
Thereafter, the site was filled
with 10,000 cubic yards of
topsoil and revegetated. The
design specifications for this
project included not only
details on every aspect of the
construction work to be
performed, but also special
plans for environmental
protection, worker safety,
regulatory compliance, and
equipment decontamination. I
addition, the specifications
included characterizations of
the types of hazardous
substances expected on site, a
well as explanations of how
they would be excavated,
consolidated, solidified,
bulked, and transported.
Especially when the contents
of drums, tanks, or lagoons
were uncertain, or when there
was a strong possibility of
uncovering pockets of
chemical wastes as excavation
proceeded, careful advance
contingency planning has bee
necessary. These factors
require a remedial action to bi
far more than an ordinary
construction project. It has
taken anywhere from six
months to two years to
complete remedial design and
action; recently, the average
cost has approached $8
million.
At 14 of the nation's
hazardous sites, EPA, States, i
responsible parties had
completed the work required,
and the site had been deleted
from the National Priorities
List. A site is deleted from thi
NPL when all necessary
procedures have been followe
and completed, including a
public comment period,
Regional and Headquarters
EPA review, and Federal
Register publication of the
deletion decision. Any sites
deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for Fund-financed
remedial actions in the
unlikely event that conditions
at the site warrant such actior
To date, one site has been
restored to the NPL.
14
-------
Section 5: Infrastructure Development
Developing a
Scientific and
Technical
Infrastructure
The problems caused by toxic
waste lie at the frontiers of
applied science. To address
these problems, it has been
necessary to understand how
complex mixtures of chemicals
migrate through the soil,
ground water, and the air. This
has been a task of major
proportions for environmental
scientists, requiring a
combination of the empirical
results of field sampling with
the theoretical models
developed in the scientific
literature. Even the detection
of contaminants in soil or
water at the levels generally
found at Superfund sites was
impossible until only a few
years ago. In part, this is why
the extent of the nation's
hazardous waste problem
escaped recognition for so
long.
Of even greater complexity
has been the task of estimating
the degree to which human
health is endangered by these
sites. Typically, people at risk
because of a waste site have
been exposed to only minute
quantities of toxic substances,
and the health effects of these
substances typically do not
surface until long after the
exposure has taken place.
Consequently, even if the
health effects of exposure to a
particular chemical are well
understood—and this is rarely
the case—it is exceedingly
difficult to estimate the extent
to which any one person's
health may be at risk.
Over the past decade, EPA
and other federal agencies have
increased their emphasis on
research to assess the health
effects of exposure to
hazardous substances. While
this research has been
applicable to a range of
environmental programs, it has
had particular relevance to
Superfund. EPA and the
Centers for Disease Control
and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease
Registry in the Department of
Health and Human Services
have been working to assess
risks at specific sites and to
Using a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer to measure
minute quantities of chlorinated dioxins in a water sample.
refine the risk assessment
process.
The Superfund program has
also had to deal with
uncertainty about the
engineering techniques and
equipment used in handling,
containing, treating, and
disposing of hazardous
substances. Some techniques
have had to be tested in the
field, such as excavation of
contaminated soil, or repacking
corroding drums. Others
seemed promising in theory,
but had limited application in
the field, such as grout
curtains intended to prevent
the leakage of chemicals from
lagoons into ground water.
Many of the techniques
developed thus far, both
proven and unproven, have
been very expensive.
Moreover, they may not
permanently solve the
problems at a site. Since the
inception of the Superfund
program, therefore, EPA has
constantly worked to expand
the array of techniques
available for cleaning up
hazardous wastes. For
example, EPA has designed a
mobile soils washing system
which can remove a broad
range of hazardous materials
from excavated soils. This
system extracts contaminants
from the soil, which allows the
soil then to be left at the site. It
is expected to be an economic
alternative to the current
practice of hauling
contaminated soil off the site
to a landfill. As a recycling
measure, EPA has developed a
mobile carbon regenerator that
detoxifies or reactivates spent
carbon used to remove
contamination from liquids.
EPA has also" developed a
mobile hazardous waste
incineration system, which can
dispose of many hazardous
materials on-site, including
PCB.s, kepone, malathion, and
dioxin. This eliminates the
need to transport such
dangerous substances. The
system is mounted on a
semi-trailer and is equipped
with a rotary kiln, a second
stage combustion chamber, and
a gas scrubber. EPA is also
reviewing proposals from
private firms to develop other
on-site treatment techniques.
Prior to the Superfund
program, there were few firms
with any experience in
addressing waste site
problems; the capacity to
conduct the work involved in a
program of this size was
simply unavailable in the
private sector. Because the
Superfund program had to rely
on contractors, the program
could not advance until
qualified firms expanded their
staffs, developed operating and
management procedures for
contracts of such magnitude
and complexity, and acquired
the appropriate scientific and
engineering expertise.
Laboratory capacity was a
critical problem. Samples from
the rapidly expanding
Superfund investigations
caused an almost exponential
growth in required analyses,
from less than 2000 samples in
1980 to over 70,000 samples in
1986, resulting in a national
lab capacity shortage that
exacerbated the delays in
investigations for remedial
actions. EPA's Contract
Laboratory Program has
worked with increasing
success to build up the
nation's laboratory capacity
and at the same time ensure
the quality control and
chain-of-custody procedures
required to yield results that
will hold up in court. In
addition, the average time for
delivery of analytical results
has decreased from 47 days in
1980 to 33 days in 1986.
15
-------
Establishing a
Management
Infrastructure
EPA has developed
management procedures and
management systems to
administer an enormous new
program—one that has
required EPA to step beyond
its traditional role as a
regulatory agency in order to
take action to clean up
hazardous waste nationwide.
EPA has developed and
continues to refine guidelines
and procedures for each step
in the technically complex
process of identifying,
investigating, and cleaning up
sites. In addition, EPA has
formulated procedures to
coordinate the efforts of EPA
staff in the agency's
Washington Headquarters, its
front-line staff in 10 Regional
Offices across the nation, State
government staff, contractors,
and private parties who
assume responsibility for the
cleanup. Information systems
have been developed, not only
to manage the large sums of
money being spent and the
efforts underway at hundreds
of projects simultaneously, but
also to permit the exchange of
up-to-the-minute technical
information about the
properties of various
chemicals, response
technologies, safety
procedures, and sources of
emergency assistance.
Conclusion
In 1980, the nation committed
itself to a major Federal effort
to tackle its hazardous waste
problem. In the six years since,
EPA has developed a program
which has brought the United
States to a new level of
understanding about hazardous
substances and how they can
be treated. Superfund is
comprehensive, yet flexible
and innovative. Its mission is
both immediate and
long-range; its focus is specific
enough to handle individual
site cleanups with precision,
yet broad enough to stimulate
advances in a scientifically and
technically new field.
Superfund has brought about
permanent solutions to a
number of major hazardous
waste problems already. In the
years ahead, more cleanups
will be carried out as a result
of Superfund's stimulation of
rapid growth in technical
expertise, experience, and
ability to handle hazardous
substance problems.
Glossary
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act
CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Information System
DOJ Department of Justice
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NCP National Contingency Plan
NPL National Priorities List
NRC National Response Center
NRT National Response Team
OSC On-Scene Coordinator
PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls
RCRA Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
ROD Record of Decision
RQ Reportable Quantity
SARA Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986
16
-------
Appendix A
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State) June 1986
St Site Name
AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL Anniston Army Depot (SE Ind Area)
AL Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Mclntosh Plant)
AL Interstate Lead Co. (ILCO)
AL Mowbray Engineering Co.
AL Olin Corp. (Mclntosh Plant)
AL Perdido Ground Water Contamin
AL Stauffer Chem (Cold Creek Plant)
AL Stauffer Chem (LeMoyne Plant)
AL Triana/Tennessee River
AR Arkwood , Inc .
AR Cecil Lindsey
AR Frit Industries
AR Gurley Pit
AR Industrial Waste Control
AR Mid- South Wood Products
AR Midland Products
AR Vertac , Inc .
AZ Apache Powder Co.
AZ Hassayampa Landfill
AZ Indian Bend Wash Area
AZ Litchfield Airport Area
AZ Mesa Area Ground Water Contamin
AZ Motorola, Inc. (52nd Street Plant)
AZ Mountain View Mobile Homes *
AZ Nineteenth Avenue Landfill
AZ Tucson Intl Airport Area
CA Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
CA Aerojet General Corp.
CA Applied Materials
CA Atlas Asbestos Mine
CA Beckman Instruments (Porterville)
CA Castle Air Force Base
CA Celtor Chemical Works
CA Coalinga Asbestos Mine
CA Coast Wood Preserving
CA Del Norte Pesticide Storage
CA Fairchild Camera (Mountain View)
CA Fairchild Camera (S San Jose Pit)
CA Firestone Tire (Salinas Plant)
CA FMC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
CA Hewlett Packard
CA IBM Corp. (San Jose Plant)
CA Intel Corp. (Mountain View Plant)
CA Intel Corp. (Santa Clara III)
CA Intel Magnetics
CA Iron Mountain Mine
* State top priority site
1 : Date first eligible for Superfund remedial action
in Interim Priorities List (10/81) and Expanded
2: Sites on the final NPL are numbered. Proposed
(GR) corresponding to groups of 50 on the final
Date
Proposed or
City/County Announced1
Childersburg
Anniston
Mclntosh
Leeds
Greenville
Mclntosh
Perdido
Bucks
Axis
Limes tone/Morgan
Omaha
Newport
Walnut Ridge
Edmonds on
Fort Smith
Mena
Ola/Birta
Jacksonville
Benson
Hassayampa
Scottsdale/Tmpe/Phnx
Goodyear /Avondale
Mesa
Phoenix
Globe
Phoenix
Tucson
Sunnyvale
Rancho Cordova
Santa Clara
Fresno County
Porterville
Merced
Hoop a
Coalinga
Ukiah
Crescent City
Mountain View
South San Jose
Salinas
Fresno
Palo Alto
San Jose
Mountain View
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
Redding
10/84
10/84
9/83
9/85
12/82
9/83
12/82
9/83
9/83
10/81
9/85
12/82
10/81
12/82
12/82
10/81
10/84
10/81
6/86
6/86
12/82
12/82
6/ae
10/84
7/82
10/81
7/82
10/84
10/81
10/84
9/83
10/84
10/84
12/82
9/83
12/82
9/83
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/81
. First NPL proposed 12/82. Some sites announced
Eligibility List (7/82).
NPL sites and all sites in the Federal
NPL.
Final
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
6/86
6/86
6/86
9/83
earlier
(F) sections are placed
Rank/
Group2
Gr 9F
Gr 3F
125
292
119
377
655
221
585
31
Gr 11
474
383
364
652
244
640
18
Gr 4
Gr 6
322
242
Gr 12
Gr 7
94
115
70
421
109
Gr 13
246
529
Gr 9F
653
247
262
466
Gr 13
Gr 9
Gr 5
Gr 8
Gr 14
Gr 14
668
605
604
73
into grouj
17
-------
Date
SI Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
CA J.H. Baxter Co.
CA Jibboom Junkyard
CA Koppers Co.,Inc. (Oroville Plant)
CA Lawrence Livermore Lab (USDOE)
CA Liquid Gold Oil Corp.
CA Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.
CA Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
CA Marley Cooling Tower Co.
CA Mather AFB (AC&W Disposal Site)
CA McClellan AFB (Ground Water Cont)
CA McColl
CA MGM Brakes
CA Moffett Naval Air Station
CA Monolithic Memories
CA Montrose Chemical Corp.
CA National Semiconductor Corp.
CA Norton Air Force Base
CA Operating Industries, Inc. Lndfll
CA Purity Oil Sales, Inc.
CA Raytheon Corp.
CA Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp.
CA Sacramento Army Depot
CA San Fernando Valley (Area 1)
CA San Fernando Valley (Area 2)
CA San Fernando Valley (Area 3)
CA San Fernando Valley (Area 4)
CA San Gabriel Valley (Area 1)
CA San Gabriel Valley (Area 2)
CA San Gabriel Valley (Area 3)
CA San Gabriel Valley (Area 4)
CA Selma Treating Co.
CA Sharpe Army Depot
CA Signetics, Inc.
CA South Bay Asbestos Area
CA Southern Pacific Transportation
CA Stringfellow *
CA T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Co.
CA Teledyne Semiconductor
CA Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
CA Waste Disposal, Inc.
CA Westinghouse (Sunnyvale Plant)
CO Broderick Wood Products
CO California Gulch
CO Central City-Clear Creek
CO Denver Radium Site
CO Eagle Mine
CO Lincoln Park
CO Lowry Landfill
CO Marshall Landfill *
CO Martin Marietta, Denver Aerospace
CO Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal
CO Sand Creek Industrial
CO Smuggler Mountain
CO Uravan Uranium (Union Carbide)
CO Woodbury Chemical Co.
CT Beacon Heights Landfill
CT Kellogg-Deering Well Field
CT Laurel Park, Inc. *
CT Old Southington Landfill
CT Revere Textile Prints Corp.
Weed 10/84
Sacramento 12/82
Oroville 9/83
Livermore 10/84
Richmond 12/82
San Jose 10/84
Oroville 10/84
Stockton 10/84
Sacramento 10/84
Sacramento 10/84
Fullerton 12/82
Cloverdale 12/82
Sunnyvale 4/85
Sunnyvale 10/84
Torrance 10/84
Santa Clara 10/84
San Bernardino 10/84
Monterey Park 10/84
Malaga 12/82
Mountain View 10/84
East Palo Alto 10/84
Sacramento 10/84
Los Angeles 10/84
Los Angeles/Glendale 10/84
Glendale 10/84
Los Angeles 10/84
El Monte 9/83
Baldwin Park Area 9/83
Alhambra 9/83
La Puente 9/83
Selma 12/82
Lathrop 10/84
Sunnyvale 10/84
Alviso 10/84
Roseville 10/84
Glen Avon Heights 10/81
Fresno 10/84
Mountain View 10/84
San Jose 10/84
Santa Fe Springs 6/86
Sunnyvale 10/84
Denver 9/83
Leadville 12/82
Idaho Springs 7/82
Denver 10/81
Minturn/Redcliff 10/84
Canon City 9/83
Arapahoe County 9/83
Boulder County 7/82
Waterton 9/85
Golden 10/84
Adams County 10/84
Commerce City 12/82
Pitkin County 10/84
Uravan 10/84
Commerce City 7/82
Beacon Falls 12/82
Norwalk 9/83
Naugatuck Borough 10/81
Southington 9/83
Sterling 6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
6/86
6/86
6/86
5/84
5/84
5/84
5/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
Gr 11
682
553
Gr 7F
279
Gr 11
554
Gr 12
Gr 14F
Gr 2F
335
512
Gr 12F
Gr 7
Gr 11
Gr 10
Gr 8F
71
280
669
Gr 13
Gr 6F
325
326
327
482
323
324
689
690
188
Gr 7F
Gr 13
263
Gr 13
32
328
Gr 7
Gr 3
Gr 11
370
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
498
75
152
269
213
621
194
85
Gr 5
Gr IF
Gr 2F
36
622
275
257
220
371
84
113
Gr 7
18
-------
Date
St
CT
CT
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
Site Name
Solvents Recovery Service
Yaworski Waste Lagoon
Army Creek Landfill
Cokers Sanitation Service Lfs
Delaware City PVC Plant
Delaware Sand & Gravel Landfill
Dover Air Force Base
Halby Chemical Co .
Harvey & Knott Drum, Inc.
NCR Corp. (Millsboro)
New Castle Spill
New Castle Steel
Standard Chlorine of Delaware
Tybouts Corner Landfill *
Tyler Refrigeration Pit
Wildcat Landfill
Alpha Chemical Corp .
American Creosote (Pensacola Pit)
Brown Wood Preserving
Cabot/Koppers
City Industries, Inc.
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving Co.
Davie Landfill
Dubose Oil Products Co.
Florida Steel Corp.
Gold Coast Oil Corp.
Harris Corp. (Palm Bay Plant)
Hipps Road Landfill
Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal
Kassauf-Kimerling Battery
Miami Drum Services
Montco Research Products, Inc.
Munisport Landfill
NW 58th Street Landfill
Parramore Surplus
Peak Oil Co. /Bay Drum Co.
Pepper Steel & Alloys, Inc.
Petroleum Products Corp.
Pickettville Road Landfill
Pioneer Sand Co.
Piper Aircraft/Vero Beach Wtr&Swr
Pratt & Whitney Air/United Tech
Reeves SE Galvanizing Corp.
Sapp Battery Salvage
Schuylkill Metals Corp.
Sherwood Medical Industries
Sixty-Second Street Dump
Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds
Taylor Road Landfill
Tower Chemical Co .
Tri-City Oil Conservationist, Inc
Varsol Spill
Whitehouse Oil Pits
Yellow Water Road Dump
Zellwood Ground Water Contamin
Hercules 009 Landfill
Monsanto Corp. (Augusta Plant)
Olin Corp. (Areas 1,2 & 4)
Powersville Site
Robins Air Force Base
City/County
Southington
Canterbury
New Castle County
Kent County
Delaware City
New Castle County
Dover
New Castle
Kirkwood
Millsboro
New Castle County
New Castle County
Delaware City
New Castle County
Smyrna
Dover
Galloway
Pensacola
Live Oak
Gainesville
Orlando
Whitehouse
Davie
Cantonment
Indiantown
Miami
Palm Bay
Duval County
Fort Lauderdale
Tampa
Miami
Hollister
North Miami
Hialeah
Mount Pleasant
Tampa
Medley
Pembroke Park
Jacksonville
Warrington
Vero Beach
West Palm Beach
Tampa
Cottondale
Plant City
Deland
Tampa
Brandon
Seffner
Clermont
Tampa
Miami
Whitehouse
Baldwin
Zellwood
Brunswick
Augusta
Augusta
Peach County
Houston County
Proposed or
Announced1
12/82
12/82
10/81
4/85
10/81
10/81
10/84
9/85
7/82
4/85
12/82
12/82
9/85
10/81
6/86
12/82
10/81
10/81
12/82
9/83
10/84
10/81
10/81
10/84
12/82
10/81
4/85
9/83
10/81
10/81
10/81
10/84
12/82
10/81
12/82
10/84
9/83
4/85
10/81
10/81
6/86
9/85
10/81
10/81
12/82
12/82
12/82
6/86
10/81
10/81
9/83
10/81
10/81
9/85
10/81
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
10/84
Final
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/84
Rank/
Group2
256
448
9
Gr 3
647
227
Gr 10F
636
637
Gr 9
400
650
Gr 10
2
Gr 14
643
282
50
248
450
Gr 12
234
65
530
238
67
Gr 10
601
265
126
121
Gr 14
584
174
429
53
606
Gr 8
286
143
Gr 13
Gr 12
45
202
40
376
179
Gr 8
154
270
385
267
135
658
147
136
470
Gr 5
483
Gr 3F
-------
St
GU
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
ID
ID
ID
ID
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
Site Name
Ordot Landfill *
Kunia Wells I
Kunia Wells II
Mililani Wells
Waiawa Shaft
Waipahu Wells
Waipio Heights Wells II
A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Aidex Corp. *
Chemplex Co.
Des Moines TCE
Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
John Deere (Dubuque Works)
LaBounty Site
Lawrence Todtz Farm
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm
Red Oak City Landfill
Shaw Avenue Dump
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Vogel Paint & Wax Co.
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Bunker Hill Mining & Metallurg
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling Co.
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
A & F Material Reclaiming, Inc.
Acme Solvent (Morristown Plant)
Belvidere Municipal Landfill
Byron Salvage Yard
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke)
Galesburg/Koppers Co.
H.O.D. Landfill
Johns-Manville Corp.
Joliet Army Ammu Plant (LAP Area)
Pallet Army Ammu Plant (Mfg Area)
Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek)
Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler Park)
Kerr-McGee (Residential Areas)
Kerr-McGee (Sewage Treat Plant)
LaSalle Electric Utilities
NL Indus tries/Taracorp Lead Smelt
Outboard Marine Corp. *
Pagel's Pit
Petersen Sand & Gravel
Sangamo/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI)
Savanna Army Depot Activity
Sheffield (U.S. Ecology, Inc.)
Tri- County Lf /Waste Mgmt Illinois
Velsicol Chemical (Illinois)
Wauconda Sand & Gravel
American Chemical Service , Inc .
Bennett Stone Quarry
Columbus Old Municipal Lndfll #1
Douglass Road/Uniroyal , Inc., Lf
Envirochem Corp.
Firestone Industrial Products Co.
Fisher -Calo
Fort Wayne Reduction Dump
International Minerals (E. Plant)
City/County
Guam
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Dubuque
Council Bluffs
Clinton/Camanche
Des Moines
Humboldt
Dubuque
Charles City
Camanche
Kellogg
Red Oak
Charles City
Mount Vernon
Orange City
Rathdrum
Smelterville
Pocatello
Pocatello
Greenup
Morristown
Belvidere
Byron
Pembroke Township
Galesburg
Antioch
Waukegan
Joliet
Joliet
DuPage County
West Chicago
W Chic/DuPage Cnty
West Chicago
LaSalle
Granite City
Waukegan
Rockford
Libertyville
Carterville
Savanna
Sheffield
South Elgin
Marshall
Wauconda
Griffith
Bloomington
Columbus
Mishawaka
Zionsville
Noblesville
LaPorte
Fort Wayne
Terre Haute
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
10/81
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
9/85
10/81
10/84
12/82
4/85
9/85
12/82
9/85
9/85
6/86
9/85
10/84
10/84
12/82
12/82
9/83
9/83
7/82
7/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
9/85
12/82
4/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
12/82
10/84
10/81
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
6/86
12/82
7/82
9/83
9/83
9/85
6/86
12/82
9/85
12/82
10/84
10/84
Final
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
Rank/
Group2
97
Gr 8
Gr 8
Gr 7
Gr 7
Gr 8
Gr 10
Gr 6
93
Gr 3
313
Gr 3
Gr 11
8
141
596
Gr 11
Gr 14
Gr 13
617
679
106
312
123
101
599
701
542
331
509
Gr 3
403
Gr 10F
Gr 12F
Gr 8
Gr 8
Gr 9
Gr 10
330
408
86
239
397
Gr 6F
Gr 7F
Gr 14
Gr 6
190
127
504
583
250
Gr 7
230
Gr 14
142
305
68
20
-------
St
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
Site Name
Lake Sandy Jo (M&M Landfill)
Lemon Lane Landfill
Main Street Well Field
Marion (Bragg) Dump
MIDCO I
MIDCO II
Neal's Dump (Spencer)
Neal's Landfill (Bloomington)
Ninth Avenue Dump
Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc
Poer Farm
Prestolite Battery Division
Reilly Tar (Indianapolis Plant)
Seymour Recycling Corp. *
Southside Sanitary Landfill
Tri- State Plating
Waste, Inc., Landfill
Wayne Waste Oil
Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Arkansas City Dump *
Big River Sand Co.
Cherokee County
Doepke Disposal (Holliday)
Johns' Sludge Pond
National Industrial Environ Serv
Strother Field Industrial Park
A.L. Taylor (Valley of Drums) *
Airco
B.F. Goodrich
Distler Brickyard
Distler Farm
Howe Valley Landfill
Lee's Lane Landfill
Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal
Newport Dump
Smith's Farm
Bayou Bonfouca
Bayou Sorrell Site
Cleve Reber
Combustion, Inc.
Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
Old Inger Oil Refinery *
Petro - Processors
Baird & McGuire
Cannon Engineering Corp. (CEC)
Charles -George Reclamation Lndfll
Groveland Wells
Haverhill Municipal Landfill
Hocomonco Pond
Industri-Plex
Iron Horse Park
New Bedford Site *
Norwood PCBs
Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump
Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engnrng
PSC Resources
Re -Solve, Inc.
Rose Disposal Pit
Salem Acres
City/County
Gary
Bloomington
Elkhart
Marion
Gary
Gary
Spencer
Bloomington
Gary
Zionsville
Hancock County
Vincennes
Indianapolis
Seymour
Indianapolis
Columbus
Michigan City
Columbia City
Lebanon
Arkansas City
Wichita
Cherokee County
Johnson County
Wichita
Furley
Cowley County
Brooks
Calvert City
Calvert City
West Point
Jefferson County
Howe Valley
Louisville
Hillsboro
Newport
Brooks
Slidell
Bayou Sorrell
Sorrento
Denham Springs
Doyline
Darrow
Scotlandville
Holbrook
Bridgewater
Tyngsborough
Groveland
Haverhill
Westborough
Woburn
Billerica
New Bedford
Norwood
Ashland
Plymouth
Palmer
Dartmouth
Lanesboro
Salem
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
10/84
10/84
10/81
12/82
9/83
9/83
9/85
9/83
10/81
6/86
9/85
4/85
12/82
12/82
10/81
10/84
12/82
12/82
12/82
10/84
10/84
10/81
12/82
12/82
12/82
7/82
6/86
7/82
10/84
12/82
10/84
12/82
7/82
12/82
6/86
10/84
7/82
9/83
12/82
12/82
10/81
12/82
10/84
12/82
10/81
9/83
7/82
10/84
10/81
12/82
12/82
10/81
10/84
10/84
Final
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
Rank/
Group2
402
677
301
494
231
661
456
290
361
237
431
Gr 9
536
57
Gr 10
678
Gr 4
310
623
100
582
56
206
464
Gr 8
564
96
570
575
260
517
Gr 9
382
612
427
580
667
513
189
Gr 11
Gr 14F
81
339
14
372
209
349
654
259
5
288
80
674
11
105
392
198
573
505
21
-------
St
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
ME
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
Site Name
Shpack Landfill
Silresim Chemical Corp.
Sul 1 ivan ' s Le dge
W. R. Grace & Co. (Acton Plant)
Wells G&H
Aber Prov Ground-Michaelsville Lf
Aberdeen Proving Ground- Edgewood
Kane & Lombard Street Drums
Limestone Road
Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers , Inc
Middletown Road Dump
Sand, Gravel & Stone
Southern Maryland Wood Treating
Brunswick Naval Air Station
McKin Co.
O'Connor Co.
Pinette's Salvage Yard
Saco Tannery Waste Pits
Union Chemical Co . , Inc .
Winthrop Landfill
American Anodco , Inc .
Anderson Development Co .
Auto Ion Chemicals , Inc .
Avenue "E" Ground Water Contamin
Berlin & Farro
Burrows Sanitation
Butterworth #2 Landfill
Cemetery Dump
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Chem Central
Clare Water Supply
Cliff/Dow Dump
Duell & Gardner Landfill
E.I. Du Pont (Montague Plant)
Electrovoice
Folkertsma Refuse
Forest Waste Products
G&H Landfill
Grand Traverse Overall Supply Co.
Gratiot County Landfill *
H. Brown Co., Inc.
Hedblum Industries
Hooker (Montague Plant)
Ionia City Landfill
J & L Landfill
K&L Avenue Landfill
Kent City Mobile Home Park
Kentwood Landfill
Kysor Industrial Corp.
Lacks Industries, Inc.
Liquid Disposal, Inc.
Mason County Landfill
McGraw Edison Corp.
Me tamo r a Landfill
Michigan Disposal (Cork St Lf)
Motor Wheel, Inc.
North Bronson Industrial Area
Northernaire Plating
Novaco Industries
Organic Chemicals, Inc.
City/County
Norton/Attleboro
Lowell
New Bedford
Acton
Woburn
Aberdeen
Edgewood
Baltimore
Cumberland
Harmans
Annapolis
Elkton
Hollywood
Brunswick
Gray
Augusta
Washburn
Saco
South Hope
Winthrop
Ionia
Adrian
Kalamazoo
Traverse City
Swartz Creek
Hartford
Grand Rapids
Rose Center
Charlevoix
Wyoming Township
Clare
Marquette
Dalton Township
Montague
Buchanan
Grand Rapids
Otisville
Utica
Greilickville
St. Louis
Grand Rapids
Oscoda
Montague
Ionia
Rochester Hills
Oshtemo Township
Kent City
Kentwood
Cadillac
Grand Rapids
Utica
Pere Marquette Twp
Albion
Metamora
Kalamazoo
Lans ing
Bronson
Cadillac
Temperance
Grandville
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
10/84
7/82
9/83
12/82
12/82
4/85
4/85
10/84
12/82
10/84
12/82
12/82
10/84
10/84
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
4/85
10/81
6/86
12/82
12/82
10/84
7/82
9/83
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
10/84
12/82
6/86
12/82
7/82
12/82
10/81
4/85
12/82
9/85
12/82
6/86
12/82
9/85
12/82
9/85
10/84
7/82
12/82
12/82
9/83
10/84
10/84
10/84
7/82
12/82
12/82
Final
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
Rank/
Group2
672
293
579
38
294
Gr 13F
Gr 3F
662
648
311
675
343
527
Gr 6F
33
607
537
284
Gr 13
472
Gr 4
633
594
625
13
644
167
532
412
404
398
521
514
Gr 9
491
Gr 12
393
180
484
78
373
434
Gr 11
619
Gr 9
409
Gr 12
490
Gr 11
Gr 11
24
531
568
485
Gr 9
184
543
59
405
576
22
-------
Date
St Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
MI Ossineke Ground Water Contain
MI Ott/Story/Cordova
MI Packaging Corp. of America
MI Petoskey Municipal Well Field
MI Rasmussen's Dump
MI Rockwell International (Allegan)
MI Rose Township Dump
MI Roto-Finish Co., Inc.
MI SCA Independent Landfill
MI Shiawassee River
MI South Macomb Disposal (Lf 9 & 9A)
MI Southwest Ottawa County Landfill
MI Sparta Landfill
MI Spartan Chemical Co.
MI Spiegelberg Landfill
MI Springfield Township Dump
MI Sturgis Municipal Wells
MI Tar Lake
MI Thermo-Chem, Inc.
MI Torch Lake
MI U.S. Aviex
MI Velsicol Chemical (Michigan)
MI Verona Well Field
MI Wash King Laundry
MI Waste Management-Mich (Holland)
MI Whitehall Municipal Wells
MN Adrian Municipal Well Field
MN Agate Lake Scrapyard
MN Arrowhead Refinery Co.
MN Boise Cascade/Onan/Medtronics
MN Burlington Northern (Brainerd)
MN East Bethel Demolition Landfill
MN FMC Corp. (Fridley Plant)
MN Freeway Sanitary Landfill
MN General Mills/Henkel Corp.
MN Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
MN Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp.
MN Koppers Coke
MN Kummer Sanitary Landfill
MN Kurt Manufacturing Co.
MN LaGrand Sanitary Landfill
MN Lehillier/Mankato Site
MN Long Prairie Ground Water Contain
MN MacGillis & Gibbs/Bell Lumber
MN New Brighton/Arden Hills
MN NL Industries/Taracorp/Golden
MN Nutting Truck & Caster Co.
MN Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill
MN Oakdale Dump
MN Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
MN Perham Arsenic Site
MN Pine Bend Sanitary Landfill
MN Reilly Tar (St. Louis Park Plant)
MN South Andover Site
MN St. Augusta SLF/St. Cloud Dump
MN St. Louis River Site
MN St. Regis Paper Co.
MN U of Minnesota Rosemount Res Cent
MN Union Scrap
MN Waite Park Wells
MN Washington County Landfill
MN Waste Disposal Engineering
Ossineke 12/82
Dalton Township 7/82
Filer City 12/82
Petoskey 12/82
Green Oak Township 12/82
Allegan 4/85
Rose Township 7/82
Kalamazoo 10/84
Muskegon Heights 12/82
Howell 12/82
Macomb Township 10/84
Park Township 12/82
Sparta Township 12/82
Wyoming 12/82
Green Oak Township 12/82
Davisburg 12/82
Sturgis 9/83
Mancelona Township 12/82
Muskegon 10/84
Houghton County 10/84
Howard Township 12/82
St. Louis 12/82
Battle Creek 7/82
Pleasant Plains Twp 12/82
Holland 10/84
Whitehall 12/82
Adrian 10/84
Fairview Township 10/84
Hermantown 9/83
Fridley 9/83
Brainerd/Baxter 7/82
East Bethel Township 9/85
Fridley 7/82
Burnsville 9/85
Minneapolis 9/83
Brooklyn Center 9/83
Pine Bend 10/84
St. Paul 10/81
Bemidj i 10/84
Fridley 10/84
LaGrand Township 6/86
Lehillier/Mankato 7/82
Long Prairie 10/84
New Brighton 9/83
New Brighton 7/82
St. Louis Park 10/81
Faribault 9/83
Oak Grove Township 10/84
Oakdale 10/81
Oronoco 10/84
Perham 9/83
Dakota County 10/84
* St. Louis Park 10/81
Andover 10/81
St. Augusta Township 9/85
St. Louis County 9/83
Cass Lake 9/83
Rosemount 10/84
Minneapolis 9/83
Waite Park 9/85
Lake Elmo 9/83
Andover 7/82
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/84
550
130
148
297
609
Gr 3
161
352
511
634
555
378
598
344
120
144
317
191
131
223
556
137
218
367
439
486
6/86
6/86
9/84
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/84
6/86
9/84
9/83
562
670
273
172
222
696
17
241
461
268
629
104
478
618
Gr 9
302
602
195
39
369
422
278
77
353
411
140
43
487
Gr 11
593
133
240
298
603
318
162
23
-------
Date
24
st
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MS
MS
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
ND
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
NH
Site Name
Whittaker Corp.
Windom Dump
Bee Cee Manufacturing Co.
Conservation Chemical Co.
Ellisville Site *
Findett Corp.
Fulbright Landfill
Lake City Army Plant (NW Lagoon)
Lee Chemical
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Quail Run Mobile Manor
Quality Plating
Shenandoah Stables
Solid State Circuits, Inc.
Syntex Facility
Times Beach Site
Valley Park TCE
Weldon Spring Quarry
Flowood Site *
Newsom Brothers/Old Reichhold
Anaconda Co. Smelter
Burlington Northern(Somers Plant)
East Helena Site
Idaho Pole Co.
Libby Ground Water Contamination
Milltown Reservoir Sediments
Montana Pole and Treating
Mouat Industries
Silver Bow Creek
Bypass 601 Ground Water Contamin
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Celanese( Shelby Fiber Operations)
Chemtronics , Inc .
Jadco -Hughes Facility
Martin Marietta, Sodyeco, Inc.
National Starch & Chemical Corp.
NC State U (Lot 86, Farm Unit #1)
Arsenic Trioxide Site *
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
Hastings Ground Water Contamin
Lindsay Manufacturing Co.
Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
Waverly Ground Water Contamin
Auburn Road Landfill
Coakley Landfill
Dover Municipal Landfill
Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp .
Keefe Environmental Services
Mottolo Pig Farm
Ottati & Goss/Kingston Steel Drum
Savage Municipal Water Supply
Somersworth Sanitary Landfill
South Municipal Water Supply Well
Sylvester *
Tibbets Road
Tinkham Garage
City/County
Minneapolis
Windom
Maiden
Kansas City
Ellisville
St. Charles
Springfield
Independence
Liberty
Imperial
Springfield
Gray Summit
S ikes ton
Moscow Mills
Republic
Verona
Times Beach
Valley Park
St. Charles County
Flowood
Columbia
Anaconda
Somers
East Helena
Bozeman
Libby
Milltown
Butte
Columbus
Sil Bow/Deer Lodge
Concord
Fayetteville
Shelby
Swannanoa
Belmont
Charlotte
Salisbury
Raleigh
Southeastern ND
Hall County
Hastings
Lindsay
Cozad
Waverly
Londonderry
North Hampton
Dover
Conway
Epping
Raymond
Kingston
Milford
Somersworth
Peterborough
Nashua
Barrington
Londonderry
Proposed or
Announced1
9/83
10/84
10/84
4/85
10/81
10/84
10/81
10/84
10/84
12/82
10/84
9/83
10/84
12/82
10/84
12/82
3/83
4/85
10/84
9/83
10/84
12/82
10/84
9/83
10/84
12/82
12/82
6/86
10/84
12/82
10/84
6/86
10/84
12/82
10/84
12/82
4/85
10/84
10/81
10/84
10/84
10/84
9/85
10/84
12/82
10/84
12/82
9/83
10/81
4/85
10/81
9/83
12/82
9/83
10/81
4/85
12/82
Final
9/84
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
Rank/
Group2
368
406
702
Gr 14
90
Gr 9
355
Gr 12F
219
447
688
Gr 15
354
663
419
271
366
481
Gr 2F
98
245
47
Gr 9
29
401
426
272
Gr 12
613
20
418
Gr 11
181
660
332
146
Gr 13
193
91
Gr 4F
321
Gr 4
Gr 2
420
459
680
442
395
19
Gr 8
129
430
16
471
23
342
281
-------
Date
St Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
NJ A. 0. Polymer
NJ American Cyanamid Co.
NJ Asbestos Dump
NJ Beachwood/Berkley Wells
NJ Bog Creek Farm
NJ Brick Township Landfill
NJ Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services
NJ Burnt Fly Bog
NJ Caldwell Trucking Co.
NJ Chemical Control
NJ Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.
NJ Chemsol, Inc.
NJ Ciba-Geigy Corp.
NJ Cinnaminson Ground Water Contamin
NJ Combe Fill North Landfill
NJ Combe Fill South Landfill
NJ Cooper Road
NJ GPS/Madison Industries
NJ D'Imperio Property
NJ Dayco Corp./L.E Carpenter Co.
NJ De Rewal Chemical Co.
NJ Delilah Road
NJ Denzer & Schafer X-Ray Co.
NJ Diamond Alkali Co.
NJ Dover Municipal Well 4
NJ Ellis Property
NJ Evor Phillips Leasing
NJ Ewan Property
NJ Fair Lawn Well Field
NJ Florence Land Recontouring Lndfll
NJ Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
NJ Fried Industries
NJ GEMS Landfill
NJ Glen Ridge Radium Site
NJ Goose Farm
NJ Helen Kramer Landfill
NJ Hercules, Inc. (Gibbstown Plant)
NJ Hopkins Farm
NJ Imperial Oil/Champion Chemicals
NJ Jackson Township Landfill
NJ JIS Landfill
NJ Kin-Buc Landfill
NJ King of Prussia
NJ Krysowaty Farm
NJ Landfill & Development Co.
NJ Lang Property
NJ Lipari Landfill
NJ Lodi Municipal Well
NJ Lone Pine Landfill
NJ M&T Delisa Landfill
NJ Mannheim Avenue Dump
NJ Matlack, Inc.
NJ Maywood Chemical Co.
NJ Metaltec/Aerosystems
NJ Monitor Devices/Intercircuits Inc
NJ Monroe Township Landfill
NJ Montclair/West Orange Radium Site
NJ Montgomery Township Housing Dev
NJ Myers Property
NJ Nascolite Corp.
NJ Naval Air Engineering Center
NJ Naval Weapons Stat Earle (Site A)
NJ NL Industries
Sparta Township 12/82
Bound Brook 12/82
Millington 12/82
Berkley Township 12/82
Howell Township 12/82
Brick Township 12/82
Bridgeport 10/81
Marlboro Township 10/81
Fairfield 12/82
Elizabeth 10/81
Bridgeport 9/83
Piscataway 12/82
Toms River 12/82
Cinnaminson Township 10/84
Mount Olive Twp 12/82
Chester Township 12/82
Voorhees Township 9/83
Old Bridge Township 12/82
Hamilton Township 10/81
Wharton Borough 4/85
Kingwood Township 9/83
Egg Harbor Township 9/83
Bayville 12/82
Newark 9/83
Dover Township 12/82
Evesham Township 12/82
Old Bridge Township 12/82
Shamong Township 9/83
Fair Lawn 12/82
Florence Township 9/83
Wrightstown 10/84
East Brunswick Twp 10/84
Gloucester Township 7/82
Glen Ridge 10/84
Plumstead Township 10/81
Mantua Township 7/82
Gibbstown 12/82
Plumstead Township 9/83
Morganville 12/82
Jackson Township 12/82
Jamesburg/S. Brnswck 12/82
Edison Township 10/81
Winslow Township 12/82
Hillsborough 7/82
Mount Holly 9/83
Pemberton Township 12/82
Pitman 10/81
Lodi 10/84
Freehold Township 10/81
Astury Park 12/82
Galloway Township 12/82
Woolwich Township 9/85
Maywood/Rochelle Pk 12/82
Franklin Borough 12/82
Wall Township 4/85
Monroe Township 12/82
Montclair/W Orange 10/84
Montgomery Township 12/82
Franklin Township 12/82
Millville 9/83
Lakehurst 9/85
Colts Neck 10/84
Pedricktown 12/82
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
2/85
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
2/85
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
683
168
381
314
283
58
35
42
51
215
204
295
166
415
197
251
446
10
76
Gr 4
467
175
359
488
685
516
451
170
300
207
Gr 9F
565
12
177
199
4
360
533
545
407
252
164
210
103
558
185
1
Gr 12
15
586
455
Gr 11
157
182
333
308
178
413
546
158
Gr 4F
Gr 9F
132
25
-------
Date
St Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
NJ Pepe Field
NJ Pijak Farm
NJ PJP Landfill
NJ Pomona Oaks Residential Wells
NJ Price Landfill *
NJ Radiation Technology, Inc.
NJ Reich Farms
NJ Renora, Inc.
NJ Ringwood Mines/Landfill
NJ Rockaway Borough Well Field
NJ Rockaway Township Wells
NJ Rocky Hill Municipal Well
NJ Roebling Steel Co.
NJ Sayreville Landfill
NJ Scientific Chemical Processing
NJ Sharkey Landfill
NJ Shieldalloy Corp.
NJ South Brunswick Landfill
NJ Spence Farm
NJ Swope Oil & Chemical Co.
NJ Syncon Resins
NJ Tabernacle Drum Dump
NJ U.S. Radium Corp.
NJ Universal Oil Products(Chem Div)
NJ Upper Deerfield Township San Lndf
NJ Ventron/Velsicol
NJ Vineland Chemical Co., Inc.
NJ Vineland State School
NJ W. R. Grace & Co. (Wayne Plant)
NJ Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc.
NJ Williams Property
NJ Wilson Farm
NJ Woodland Route 532 Dump
NJ Woodland Route 72 Dump
NM AT & SF (Clovis)
NM Homestake Mining Co.
NM South Valley *
NM United Nuclear Corp.
NY American Thermostat Co.
NY Anchor Chemicals
NY Applied Environmental Services
NY Batavia Landfill
NY EEC Trucking
NY BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
NY Brewster Well Field
NY Byron Barrel & Drum
NY Claremont Polychemical
NY Clothier Disposal
NY Colesville Municipal Landfill
NY Conklin Dumps
NY Cortese Landfill
NY Endicott Village Well Field
NY Facet Enterprises, Inc.
NY FMC Corp. (Dublin Road Landfill)
NY Fulton Terminals
NY GE Moreau
NY General Motors (Cent Foundry Div)
NY Genzale Plating Co.
NY Goldisc Recordings, Inc.
NY Griffiss Air Force Base
NY Haviland Complex
Boonton 12/82 9/83 547
Plumstead Township 10/81 9/83 276
Jersey City 12/82 9/83 698
Galloway Township 10/84 6/86 600
Pleasantville 10/81 9/83 6
Rockaway Township 9/83 9/84 299
Pleasant Plains 12/82 9/83 122
Edison Township 12/82 9/83 358
Ringwood Borough 12/82 9/83 134
Rockaway Township 12/82 9/83 309
Rockaway 12/82 9/83 686
Rocky Hill Borough 12/82 9/83 414
Florence 12/82 9/83 345
Sayreville 12/82 9/83 441
Carlstadt 12/82 9/83 74
Parsippany/Troy His 12/82 9/83 187
Newfield Borough 9/83 9/84 46
South Brunswick 12/82 9/83 124
Plumstead Township 10/81 9/83 243
Pennsauken 7/82 9/83 469
South Kearny 7/82 9/83 277
Tabernacle Township 9/83 9/84 445
Orange 12/82 9/83 423
East Rutherford 12/82 9/83 108
Upper Deerfield Twp 9/83 9/84 559
Wood Ridge Borough 9/83 9/84 153
Vineland 9/83 9/84 41
Vineland 12/82 9/83 348
Wayne Township 9/83 9/84 214
Wall Township 10/84 6/86 258
Swainton 12/82 9/83 357
Plumstead Township 9/83 9/84 539
Woodland Township 9/83 9/84 503
Woodland Township 9/83 9/84 627
Clovis 10/81 9/83 563
Milan 10/81 9/83 528
Albuquerque 7/82 9/83 87
Church Rock 10/81 9/83 651
South Cairo 12/82 9/83 566
Hicksville 10/84 6/86 438
Glenwood Landing 10/84 6/86 340
Batavia 10/81 9/83 171
Town of Vestal 10/84 6/86 642
Bohemia 6/86 Gr 10
Putnam County 12/82 9/83 416
Byron 10/84 6/86 436
Old Bethpage 10/84 6/86 614
Town of Granby 10/84 6/86 522
Town of Colesville 10/84 6/86 657
Conklin 6/86 Gr 11
Vil of Narrowsburg 10/84 6/86 592
Village of Endicott 10/84 6/86 477
Elmira 10/81 9/83 226
Town of Shelby 10/84 6/86 578
Fulton 12/82 9/83 457
South Glen Falls 12/82 9/83 52
Massena 9/83 9/84 350
Franklin Square 6/86 Gr 11
Holbrook 10/84 6/86 569
Rome 10/84 Gr 11F
Town of Hyde Park 10/84 6/86 561
26
-------
Date
St
Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
NY Hertel Landfill
NY Hooker (102nd Street)
NY Hooker (Hyde Park)
NY Hooker (S Area)
NY Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer Corp
NY Hudson River PCBs
NY Johnstown City Landfill
NY Katonah Municipal Well
NY Kenmark Textile Corp.
NY Kentucky Avenue Well Field
NY Liberty Industrial Finishing
NY Love Canal
NY Ludlow Sand & Gravel
NY Malta Rocket Fuel Area
NY Marathon Battery Corp.
NY Mercury Refining, Inc.
NY Nepera Chemical Co., Inc.
NY Niagara County Refuse
NY North Sea Municipal Landfill
NY Old Bethpage Landfill
NY Olean Well Field
NY Pasley Solvents & Chemicals, Inc.
NY Pollution Abatement Services *
NY Port Washington Landfill
NY Preferred Plating Corp.
NY Ramapo Landfill
NY Richardson Hill Road Lndfll/Pond
NY Robintech, Inc./National Pipe Co.
NY Rowe Industries Ground Water Cont
NY Sarney Farm
NY Sinclair Refinery
NY SMS Instruments, Inc.
NY Solvent Savers
NY Suffern Village Well Field
NY Syosset Landfill
NY Tronic Plating Co., Inc.
NY Vestal Water Supply Well 1-1
NY Vestal Water Supply Well 4-2
NY Volney Municipal Landfill
NY Warwick Landfill
NY Wide Beach Development
NY York Oil Co.
OH Allied Chemical & Ironton Coke
OH Alsco Anaconda
OH Arcanum Iron & Metal
OH Big D Campground
OH Bowers Landfill
OH Buckeye Reclamation
OH Chem-Dyne *
OH Coshocton Landfill
OH E.H. Schilling Landfill
OH Fields Brook
OH Fultz Landfill
OH General Electric(Coshocton Plant)
OH Industrial Excess Landfill
OH Laskin/Poplar Oil Co.
OH Miami County Incinerator
OH Nease Chemical
OH New Lyme Landfill
OH Old Mill
OH Ormet Corp.
OH Powell Road Landfill
Plattekill 10/84 6/86 560
Niagara Falls 12/82 9/83 649
Niagara Falls 12/82 9/83 510
Niagara Falls 12/82 9/83 150
Hicksville 10/84 6/86 337
Hudson River 9/83 9/84 107
Town of Johnstown 10/84 6/86 192
Town of Bedford 10/84 6/86 492
Farmingdale 10/84 6/86 610
Horseheads 7/82 9/83 379
Farmingdale 10/84 6/86 163
Niagara Falls 10/81 9/83 139
Clayville 12/82 9/83 443
Malta 6/86 Gr 12
Cold Springs 10/81 9/83 656
Colonie 12/82 9/83 264
Maybrook 10/84 6/86 374
Wheatfield 10/81 9/83 375
North Sea 10/84 6/86 552
Oyster Bay 10/81 9/83 44
Olean 10/81 9/83 266
Hempstead 10/84 6/86 380
Oswego 10/81 9/83 7
Port Washington 12/82 9/83 249
Farmingdale 10/84 6/86 500
Ramapo 12/82 9/83 261
Sidney Center 6/86 Gr 11
Town of Vestal 10/84 6/86 641
Noyack/Sag Harbor 6/86 Gr 13
Amenia 10/84 6/86 572
Wellsville 7/82 9/83 118
Deer Park 10/84 6/86 433
Lincklaen 12/82 9/83 507
Village of Suffern 10/84 6/86 476
Oyster Bay 12/82 9/83 114
Farmingdale 10/84 6/86 253
Vestal 12/82 9/83 417
Vestal 12/82 9/83 315
Town of Volney 10/84 6/86 577
Warwick 9/85 Gr 14
Brant 12/82 9/83 72
Moira 7/82 9/83 201
Ironton 12/82 9/83 217
Gnadenhutten 10/84 6/86 287
Darke County 12/82 9/83 28
Kingsville 12/82 9/83 639
Circleville 12/82 9/83 165
St. Clairsville 12/82 9/83 499
Hamilton 10/81 9/83 82
Franklin Township 12/82 9/83 386
Hamilton Township 12/82 9/83 520
Ashtabula 10/81 9/83 255
Jackson Township 12/82 9/83 384
Coshocton 10/84 Gr 2
Uniontown 10/84 6/86 159
Jefferson Township 7/82 9/83 462
Troy 9/83 9/84 66
Salem 12/82 9/83 212
New Lyme 12/82 9/83 626
Rock Creek 12/82 9/83 463
Hannibal 9/85 Gr 3
Dayton 9/83 9/84 615
27
-------
Date
St
Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced*
Final
Rank/
Group2
OH Pristine, Inc.
OH Republic Steel Corp. Quarry
OH Sanitary Landfill Co. (IWD)
OH Skinner Landfill
OH South Point Plant
OH Summit National
OH TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant)
OH United Scrap Lead Co., Inc.
OH Van Dale Junkyard
OH Zanesville Well Field
OK Compass Industries (Avery Drive)
OK Hardage/Criner
OK Sand Springs Petrochemical Cmplx
OK Tar Creek (Ottawa County)
OK Tinker AFB (Soldier Cr/Bldg 3001)
OR Gould, Inc.
OR Martin-Marietta Aluminum Co.
OR Teledyne Wah Chang
OR Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
OR United Chrome Products, Inc.
PA Ambler Asbestos Piles
PA Bally Ground Water Contamination
PA Bendix Flight Systems Division
PA Berks Sand Pit
PA Blosenski Landfill
PA Brodhead Creek
PA Brown's Battery Breaking
PA Bruin Lagoon
PA Butler Mine Tunnel
PA C & D Recycling
PA Centre County Kepone
PA Craig Farm Drum
PA Croydon TCE
PA CryoChem, Inc.
PA Delta Quarries/Stotler Landfill
PA Dorney Road Landfill
PA Douglassville Disposal
PA Drake Chemical
PA East Mount Zion
PA Eastern Diversified Metals
PA Fischer & Porter Co.
PA Havertown PCP
PA Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard
PA Heleva Landfill
PA Henderson Road
PA Hranica Landfill
PA Hunterstown Road
PA Industrial Lane
PA Keystone Sanitation Landfill
PA Kimberton Site
PA Lackawanna Refuse
PA Lansdowne Radiation Site
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area)
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
PA Lindane Dump
PA Lord-Shope Landfill
PA Malvern TCE
PA McAdoo Associates *
PA Metal Banks
PA Middletown Air Field
Reading 12/82
Elyria 10/84
Dayton 10/84
West Chester 12/82
South Point 9/83
Deerfield Township 10/81
Minerva 6/86
Troy 9/83
Marietta 10/84
Zanesville 12/82
Tulsa 9/83
Criner 10/81
Sand Springs 10/84
Ottawa County 10/81
Oklahoma City 4/85
Portland 12/82
The Dalles 10/84
Albany 12/82
Hermiston 10/84
Corvallis 9/83
Ambler 10/84
Bally Borough 6/86
Bridgewater Township 9/85
Longswamp Township 9/83
West Cain Township 12/82
Stroudsburg 12/82
Shoemakersville 10/84
Bruin Borough 10/81
Pittston 6/86
Foster Township 9/85
State College Boro 12/82
Parker 12/82
Croydon 9/85
Worman 6/86
Antis/Logan Twps 6/86
Upper Macungie Twp 9/83
Douglassville 12/82
Lock Haven 7/82
Springettsbury Twp 9/83
Hometown 6/86
Warminster 12/82
Haverford 12/82
Weisenberg Township 6/86
North Whitehall Twp 12/82
Upper Herion Twp 9/83
Buffalo Township 10/81
Straban Township 10/84
Williams Township 9/83
Union Township 4/85
Kimberton Borough 12/82
Old Forge Borough 12/82
Lansdowne 4/85
Franklin County 4/85
Chambersburg 10/84
Harrison Township 10/81
Girard Township 10/81
Malvern 12/82
McAdoo Borough 10/81
Philadelphia 12/82
Middletown 10/84
9/83
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
495
666
479
659
232
138
Gr 9
54
574
475
454
160
694
55
Gr 7F
591
274
116
Gr 13F
632
6/86
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/85
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
523
Gr 9
Gr 12
597
645
630
432
3
Gr 4
Gr 6
254
699
616
Gr 15
Gr 7
236
102
394
346
Gr 13
681
399
Gr 13
169
336
145
196
304
Gr 12
673
453
703
Gr 9F
Gr 11F
151
388
225
26
571
468
28
-------
st
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
RI
RI
RI
RI
RI
RI
RI
RI
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
Site Name
Mill Creek Dump
Modern Sanitation Landfill
Moyers Landfill
MW Manufacturing
Naval Air Develop Center (8 Areas)
Old City of York Landfill
Osborne Landfill
Palmerton Zinc Pile
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Resin Disposal
Revere Chemical Co.
Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
Route 940 Drum Dump
Shriver's Corner
Stanley Kessler
Taylor Borough Dump
Tysons Dump
Voortman Farm
Wade (ABM)
Walsh Landfill
Westinghouse Elevator Co. Plant
Westline Site
Whitmoyer Laboratories
York County Solid Waste/Refuse Lf
Barceloneta Landfill
Fibers Public Supply Wells
Frontera Creek
GE Wiring Devices
Juncos Landfill
RCA Del Caribe
Upjohn Facility
Vega Alta Public Supply Wells
Central Landfill
Davis (GSR) Landfill
Davis Liquid Waste
L&RR, Inc.
Peterson/Puritan, Inc.
Picillo Farm *
Stamina Mills, Inc.
Western Sand & Gravel
Carolawn, Inc.
Geiger (C & M Oil)
Independent Nail Co .
Kalama Specialty Chemicals
Koppers Co., Inc (Florence Plant)
Leonard Chemical Co . , Inc .
Medley Farm Drum Dump
Palmetto Wood Preserving
Rochester Property
SCRDI Bluff Road *
SCRDI Dixiana
Wamchem , Inc .
Whitewood Creek *
American Creosote (Jackson Plant)
Amnicola Dump
Gallaway Pits
Lewisburg Dump
City/County
Erie
Lower Windsor Twp
Eagleville
Valley Township
Warminster Township
Seven Valleys
Grove City
Palmerton
Erie
Upper Macungie Twp
Jefferson Borough
Nockamixon Township
Bristol Township
Pocono Summit
Straban Township
King of Prussia
Taylor Borough
Upper Merion Twp
Upper Saucon Twp
Chester
Honeybrook Township
Gettysburg
Westline
Jackson Township
Hopewell Township
Florida Afuera
Jobos
Rio Abajo
Juana Diaz
Juncos
Barceloneta
Barceloneta
Vega Alta
Johnston
Glocester
Smithfield
North Smithfield
Lincoln/Cumberland
Coventry
North Smithfield
Burrillville
Fort Lawn
Rantoules
Beaufort
Beaufort
Florence
Rock Hill
Gaffney
Dixiana
Travelers Rest
Columbia
Cayce
Burton
Whitewood
Jackson
Chattanooga
Gallaway
Lewisburg
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
9/83
10/84
12/82
10/84
6/86
12/82
7/82
12/82
12/82
4/85
12/82
9/85
4/85
9/85
10/84
12/82
9/83
9/83
12/82
10/81
9/83
10/84
12/82
10/84
4/85
12/82
9/83
12/82
12/82
12/82
12/82
9/83
9/83
10/84
4/85
10/81
12/82
12/82
10/81
12/82
10/81
12/82
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
10/81
7/82
9/83
10/81
10/84
12/82
12/82
12/82
Final
9/84
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
6/66
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
Rank/
Group2
176
541
428
228
Gr 2F
540
111
289
356
Gr 14
425
Gr 13
Gr 4
Gr 6
235
544
635
25
700
452
557
458
611
233
Gr 7
341
493
285
624
581
628
334
316
224
387
208
173
365
79
534
155
595
588
62
63
156
216
Gr 13
396
Gr 7
83
351
203
21
497
347
638
567
29
-------
St Site Name
TN Milan Army Ammunition Plant
TN Murray- Ohio Dump
TN North Hollywood Dump *
TN Velsicol Chem (Hardeman County)
TX Air Force Plant #4 (Gen Dynamics)
TX Bailey Waste Disposal
TX Bio-Ecology Systems, Inc.
TX Brio Refining Co., Inc.
TX Crystal Chemical Co.
TX Crystal City Airport
TX French, Ltd.
TX Geneva Indus tries/Fuhrmann Energy
TX Harris (Farley Street)
TX Highlands Acid Pit
TX Koppers Co., Inc. (Texarkana Pit)
TX Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
TX Motco, Inc. *
TX North Cavalcade Street
TX Odessa Chromium #1
TX Odessa Chromium #2 (Andrews Hgwy)
TX Pesses Chemical Co.
TX Petro- Chemical (Turtle Bayou)
TX Sheridan Disposal Services
TX Sikes Disposal Pits
TX Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers
TX South Cavalcade Street
TX Stewco, Inc.
TX Texarkana Wood Preserving Co .
TX Triangle Chemical Co.
TX United Creosoting Co.
UT Hill Air Force Base
UT Midvale Slag
UT Monticello Rad Contaminated Props
UT Ogden Defense Depot
UT Olson/Neihart Reservoir
UT Portland Cement (Kiln Dust 2 & 3)
UT Rose Park Sludge Pit *
UT Sharon Steel (Midvale Tailings)
UT Silver Creek Tailings
UT Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
VA Atlantic Wood Industries, Inc.
VA Avtex Fibers , Inc .
VA Chisman Creek
VA Compton Farm/lst Piedmont Quarry
VA Culpeper Wood Preservers, Inc.
VA Defense General Supply Center
VA IBM Corp. (Manassas Plant Spill)
VA L.A. Clarke & Son
VA Love's Container Services Lf
VA Matthews Electroplating *
VA Rhinehart Tire Fire Dump
VA Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds
VA U.S. Titanium
VT Old Springfield Landfill
VT Pine Street Canal *
City/County
Milan
Lawrenceburg
Memphis
To one
Fort Worth
Bridge City
Grand Prairie
Friendswood
Houston
Crystal City
Crosby
Houston
Houston
Highlands
Texarkana
Texarkana
La Marque
Houston
Odessa
Odessa
Fort Worth
Liberty County
Hemps tead
Crosby
Houston
Houston
Waskom
Texarkana
Bridge City
Conroe
Ogden
Midvale
Monticello
Ogden
Wasatch County
Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City
Midvale
Park City
Tooele
Portsmouth
Front Royal
York County
Pittsylvania County
Culpeper
Chesterfield County
Manassas
Spotsylvania County
Buckingham County
Roanoke County
Frederick County
Saltville
Piney River
Springfield
Burlington
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
10/84
12/82
10/81
12/82
10/84
10/84
10/81
10/84
7/82
10/84
10/81
9/83
7/82
7/82
10/84
10/84
10/81
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
6/86
10/81
10/84
10/84
10/84
4/85
12/82
9/83
10/84
6/86
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/81
10/84
9/85
10/84
6/86
10/84
10/81
4/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
10/84
4/85
10/81
10/84
12/82
12/82
12/82
10/81
Final
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
6/86
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/84
6/86
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
Rank/
Group2
Gr 2F
229
95
200
' Gr 8F
128
501
Gr 4
34
587
22
37
538
424
620
Gr 13F
27
440
319
320
695
665
Gr 13
30
Gr 8
391
186
363
697
435
Gr 4F
Gr 11
502
Gr 6F
Gr 12
112
99
Gr 1
Gr 8
Gr 8F
Gr 7
489
211
Gr 9
Gr 5
Gr 11F
Gr 7
525
Gr 7
92
646
671
508
506
88
-------
St
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
Site Name
American Lake Gardens
Bangor Ordnance Disposal
Colbert Landfill
Com Bay, Near Shore/Tide Flats
Com Bay, South Tacoma Channel
FMC Corp. (Yakima Pit)
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Frontier Hard Chrome, Inc.
Greenacres Landfill
Harbor Island (Lead)
Hidden Valley Lf (Thun Field)
Kaiser Aluminum Mead Works
Lakewood Site
McChord AFB (Wash Rack/Treatment)
Mica Landfill
Midway Landfill
Nav Air Sta, Whid Is. (Ault)
Nav Air Sta, Whid Is. (Seaplane)
Nav Undersea Warf Stat (4 Areas)
Northside Landfill
Northwest Transformer
Old Inland Pit
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Queen City Farms
Silver Mountain Mine
Toftdahl Drums
Western Processing Co., Inc.
Wyckoff Co. /Eagle Harbor
Algoma Municipal Landfill
City Disposal Corp. Landfill
Delavan Municipal Well #4
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field
Fadrowski Drum Disposal
Hagen Farm
Hunts Disposal Landfill
Janesville Ash Beds
Janesville Old Landfill
Kohler Co. Landfill
Lauer I Sanitary Landfill
Lemberger Landfill, Inc.
Lemberger Transport & Recycling
Master Disposal Service Landfill
Mid-State Disposal, Inc. Landfill
Moss-American(Kerr-McGee Oil Co.)
Muskego Sanitary Landfill
National Presto Industries, Inc.
Northern Engraving Co.
Oconomowoc Electroplating Co. Inc
Omega Hills North Landfill
Onalaska Municipal Landfill
Schmalz Dump
Scrap Processing Co., Inc.
Sheboygan Harbor & River
Stoughton City Landfill
Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
Wausau Ground Water Contamination
Wheeler Pit
City/County
Tacoma
Bremerton
Colbert
Pierce County
Tacoma
Yakima
Tacoma
Vancouver
Spokane County
Seattle
Pierce County
Mead
Lakewood
Tacoma
Mica
Kent
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Spokane
Everson
Spokane
Yakima
Maple Valley
Loomis
Brush Prairie
Kent
Bainbridge Island
Algoma
Dunn
Delavan
Eau Claire
Franklin
Stoughton
Caledonia
Janesville
Janesville
Kohler
Menomonee Falls
Whitelaw
Franklin Township
Brookf ield
Cleveland Township
Milwaukee
Muskego
Eau Claire
Sparta
Ashippin
Germantown
Onalaska
Harrison
Medford
Sheboygan
Stoughton
Tomah
Eau Claire
Wausau
La Prairie Township
Date
Proposed or
Announced1
9/83
10/84
12/82
10/81
10/81
12/82
10/84
12/82
9/83
12/82
6/86
12/82
12/82
10/84
10/84
10/84
9/85
9/85
6/86
10/84
10/84
6/86
12/82
9/83
10/84
10/84
7/82
9/85
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
10/84
9/85
6/86
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/85
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
10/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/85
10/84
6/86
9/83
4/85
9/83
Final
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/83
9/84
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
6/86
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/84
6/86
6/86
9/83
9/84
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
6/86
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
9/84
6/86
6/86
9/84
6/86
9/84
Rank/
Group2
691
Gr 14F
338
329
110
389
Gr 6F
60
692
518
Gr 6
410
303
Gr 6F
515
117
Gr 4F
Gr 8F
Gr 12F
693
548
Gr 14
676
524
664
362
48
Gr 12
Gr 8
444
687
480
631
Gr 9
Gr 13
64
61
291
296
535
519
205
496
589
149
307
390
608
49
306
183
526
549
465
Gr 5
590
684
69
31
-------
Date
St Site Name
City/County
Proposed or
Announced1
Final
Rank/
Group2
WV Fike Chemical, Inc.
WV Follansbee Site
WV Leetown Pesticide
WV Mobay Chemical (New Martinsvilie)
WV Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
WV West Virginia Ordnance *
Nitro
Follansbee
Leetown
New Martinsville
Morgantown
Point Pleasant
WY Baxter/Union Pacific Tie Treating Laramie
12/82
12/82
12/82
10/84
10/84
10/81
12/82
9/83
9/83
9/83
6/86
9/83
9/83
460
551
449
Gr 5
473
89
437
Number of Proposed Sites: 185
Number of Final Sites: 703
Number of Proposed and Final Sites: 888
-------
Appendix B
Superfimd Emergency Response Actions
Historical Listing: 12/11/80 - 09/30/86
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
Region 1
MA| BAIRD & MCGUIRE
CT j BOURDEAUDHUI
NH| BURNS HILL ROAD
NH| BURSEY ASBESTOS
MA| CANNON ENGINEERING CORP (CEC)
RI| CASTLE HILL
MA| CHARLES GEORGE RECLAMATION LANDFILL
RI| COOKS LANDFILL
VT| CYANIDE INCIDENT
RI] DAVIS LIQUID WASTE
MA] DEAN STREET (NORWOOD PCBS)
NH| GONIC SITES
ME| GREAT DIAMOND ISLAND
MA| HOUGELS NECK
MA| INDUSTRI-PLEX
MA| IRON HORSE PARK
NH| JOHNS MANVILLE ASBESTOS SITE
CT| KAPINOS SITE
NH| KEEFE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ME) KESWICK ROAD
NHj LAKE SUNAPEE
NHJ LOWELL ROAD
NH| MATARAZZO
MAj MIDNIGHT DUMP
NH] MOTTOLO PIG FARM
MA| NEW BEDFORD SITE
CT| O!SULLIVAN'S ISLAND DRUM
NHJ OTTATI & GOSS/KINGSTON STEEL DRUM
Rlj PICILLO FARM
VT| PINE STREET CANAL
ME| PINETTE'S SALVAGE YARD
NH| POINTER ASBESTOS
NHJ RIDGE AVE ASBESTOS
CTJ RYE STREET PESTICIDE SITE
ME) SACO TANNERY WASTE PITS
NHJ SAVAGE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
NHj SHADY LANE ASBESTOS
MAj SILRESIM CHEMICAL CORP.
RI] STAMINA MILLS, INC.
NH| SYLVESTER
NHJ TINKHAM GARAGE
ME| UNION CHEMICAL CO., INC.
Rlj WESTERN SAND & GRAVEL
HOLBROOK
WILLINGTON
HUDSON
HUDSON
PLYMOUTH
NEWPORT
TYNGSBORO
EAST PROVIDENCE
VERGENNES
SMITHFIELD
NORWOOD |
GONIC |
PORTLAND j
QUINCY i
WOBURN |
BILLERICA |
HUDSON j
WILLINGTON |
EPPING I
PORTLAND |
SUNAPEE |
HUDSON I
HUDSON |
DIGHTON I
RAYMOND i
NEW BEDFORD j
DERBY |
KINGSTON (
COVENTRY I
BURLINGTON ]
WASHBURN I
HUDSON j
HUDSON |
EAST WINDSOR j
SACO |
MILFORD j
HUDSON |
LOWELL j
NORTH SMITHFIELJ
NASHUA |
LONDONDERRY |
SOUTH HOPE |
BURRILLVILLE |
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N*
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N*
Y
N*
Y
Y
Y
N*
N*
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE- MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WAST3 MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
Region 2
NY| ABANDONED DRUM
NY| ABANDONED DRUMS-ERIE CANAL
NY| AMERICAN THERMOSTAT
NY | BAYSHORE
NJJ BEACH CONTAMINATION
NY| BERNCOLOR INC.
NJJ BLUE POLY DRUM
NJ| BLUE SPRUCE INTERNATIONAL
NJ| BRADY METALS
NJ| BRIDGEPORT RENTAL & OIL SERVICES
NJ| BURNT FLY BOG
NY j BYRON BARREL & DRUM
NY j CAYADOTTA CREEK
NJ| CHEMICAL CONTROL
NJ| DELANCY TRAILER
PR I DORADO DRUM SITE
NJ| DUANE MARINE
NY| FORT TOTTEN
NJJ FRIED INDUSTRIES
NJ| GEMS LANDFILL
ROCKAWAY
TONAWANDA
SOUTH CAIRO
ISLIP
LONG BRANCH
POUGHKEEPSIE
GLOUCESTER CITY
BOUND BROOK
NEWARK
BRIDGEPORT
MARLBORO TOWNSH
BYRON
JOHNSTOWN
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
DORADO
PERTH AMBOY
NYC-QUEENS
E. BRUNSWICK
GLOUCESTER TWP
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N*
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However, currently on proposed or final NPL.
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
NJ|
NJ|
NY |
NJ|
NJJ
NY j
NJ|
NY |
NJ|
NJJ
NY I
NY |
NY I
NJ|
NY |
NY |
NJJ
PR I
NJJ
NJJ
NY I
NY I
NY |
NY |
NJJ
NY |
NY I
NY |
NY j
& #5
GOOSE FARM
HAYES PARK POOL
HORSESHOE ROAD DUMP
JAGGER LANE
KEARNY DRUM DUMP #1
KEARNY DRUM DUMP #2
KENTUCKY AVENUE WELL FIELD
KIN-BUG LANDFILL
LINCOLN AVENUE
LIPARI LANDFILL
LOCKWOOD STREET
LONG ISLAND BEACH
LOVE CANAL (BLACK CREEK)
MEK SPILL
MYERS PROPERTY
OLEAN WELL FIELD
POLLUTION ABATEMENT SERVICES (PAS)
POMONA OAKS RESIDENTIAL WELLS
PUERTO RICO ORGANIC INC
QUANTA RESOURCES
RENORA, INC.
SAG HARBOR
SAMMIS AVENUE - DEER PARK
SIGNO TRADING
WADING RIVER
WALDICK AEROSPACE DEVICES
WALLKILL WELL
WIDE BEACH DEVELOPMENT
WINDUS DRIVE
YORK OIL COMPANY
PLUMSTEAD TOWNS]
NEWARK
SAYREVILLE
SOUTHAMPTON
KEARNY
KEARNY
HORSEHEADS
EDISON TOWNSHIP
BOHEMIA
PITMAN
NEWARK
RYE
NIAGARA FALLS
HICKSVILLE
FRANKLIN TOWNSH
OLEAN
OSWEGO
GALLOWAY TOWNSH
ARECIBO
EDGEWATER
EDISON TOWNSHIP
SOUTHAMPTON
BABYLON
WESTCHESTER
SUFFOLK COUNTY
WALL TOWNSHIP
WALLKILL
BRANT
SHIRLEY
MOIRA
N*
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N*
N
Y
Y
N*
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
Region 3
PA| ABM EDDYSTONE
PAj AMBLER ASBESTOS PILES
PA| APACHE WASTE OIL
DE| ARMY CREEK LANDFILL
MD| BALTIMORE IRON & METALS
PA| BENSALEM DRUM
PA| BERKS SAND PIT-VAN ELLSWYCK
PAj BFG ELECTROPLATING
PA| BIEDLER ROAD
WV| BIG JOHN'S SALVAGE
WVj BIG JOHN'S SALVAGE-HOULT ROAD
WV| BITTLE WELL CONTAMINATION
PA| BOYERTOWN SCRAP METAL
PAJ BRODHEAD CREEK
PA) BROWN'S BATTERY BREAKING
PA I BRUIN LAGOON
PA I BURIED DRUM REMOVAL
PA| BUTLER TUNNEL
PAj C & F CHEMICAL
PA| C.E. BRUBAKER
MDJ CALIFORNIA MD DRUM
PA| CAMP RUN DRUM
PA] CAUSTIC MIDNIGHT DUMP
MD| CECIL COUNTY DUMP
MD| CHEMICAL METALS INDUSTRIES
WVJ CHESAPEAKE PCB SITE
WV| CLARK PROPERTY
MDJ COLUMBIA PARK DRUM
WV| COONS RUN
DEj DELAWARE SAND & GRAVEL LANDFILL
PA| DORNEY ROAD LANDFILL
DE| DOVER AIR FORCE BASE
PAJ DRACUP WAREHOUSE
PA| DRAKE CHEMICAL
PA| DUNCANSVILLE TANKER
PA| DUNNING MOUNTAIN DRUM FIRE
PA I EAST CUMBERLAND STREET
MD| EVANS TRAIL
PAJ EWEING ROAD DRUM SITE
PAI FENNEL ROAD
PAJ GARAGE FIRE
DELAWARE COUNTY) N
AMBLER
CONSHOHOCKEN
NEW CASTLE CTY
BALTIMORE
BENSALEM TWP
LONGSWAMP TWP
PUNXSUTAWNEY
UPPER MERION TW
FAIRMONT
FAIRMONT
CHARLES TOWN
BOYERTOWN
STROUDSBURG
SHOEMAKERSVILLE
BRUIN BOROUGH
MCKEAN COUNTY
PITTSTON
W. GOSHEN
LANCASTER
ST MARY'S CTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
PHILADELPHIA
NORTHEAST
BALTIMORE
CHESAPEAKE
KANAWHA COUNTY
COLUMBIA PARK
ADAMSVILLE
NEW CASTLE CTY
UPPER MACUNGIE
DOVER
YOUNGSVILLE
LOCK HAVEN
DUNCANSVILLE
BLAIR COUNTY
PHILADELPHIA
CALVERTON
COLLIER TOWNSHI]
BUCKS COUNTY |
GLENSIDE I
N*
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N*
N*
Y
N
N*
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
S
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However, currently on proposed or final NPL.
34
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
PA| GRADYVILLE MIDNIGHT DUMP
WV| GREENBRIAR RIVER FLOOD
VAJ HAMPTON CYLINDERS SITE
DE| HARVEY & KNOTT DRUM SITE
PA| HIGH QUALITY PLATING
WV| HOLDER CORPORATION
WVJ INTERSTATE 70 ACID SPILL
PA I INTERSTATE TRANSFORMER
MDJ KANE & LOMBARD STREET DRUMS
WVJ KNAPP CREEK
PA I KRUM TRASH
PA| LACKAWANNA REFUSE
WVJ LEETOWN PESTICIDE
MD| LOCOMOTIVE JUNKYARD
PA| MALITOVSKY DRUM CO,
WVJ MANILLA CREEK
PA I MERCER COUNTY DRUM DUMP
MD| MIDDLETOWN ROAD DUMP
PAj MT POCONO
DE| NEW CASTLE CONTAINERS
PAj OLD AMERICAN GLYCERINE-LEWIS RUN
PA| OLD GARAGE
PA I PATRICK DIEHL
PA I PINEY CREEK DRUM
PAj POTTSTOWN ABANDONED TRAILER
PA| PRINTED CIRCUITS, INC.
PA I REVERE CHEMICAL CO.
VAJ RHINEHART TIRE FIRE DUMP
WV| RICHARDSON PROPERTY
PA| ROUTE 13 DRUM SITE
MDJ SAND, GRAVEL & STONE
PA| SATELLITE/AMMET INCENDIARY
DE| SEALAND LTD
MDJ SECURITY BOULEVARD
WVJ SEMCO PCS SITE
MD| SOUTHERN MARYLAND WOOD TREATING
MD| SPRINGER SEPTIC SERVICES
PA I STARBRICK
WV| STONEMAN PROPERTY
PA| SUNSET GOLF COURSE
PAj TAYLOR BOROUGH DUMP
PA I THORN RUN SPILL
PA| TINICUM MARSH
PA| TRI-STATE ENGINEERING
PA I TURCO COATINGS
DE| TYBOUTS CORNER LANDFILL
PA| TYSONS DUMP
MDJ UNION PLATING
MD| UNITED RIGGING & HAULING
PA I VULCANIZED RUBBER & PLASTICS
PAJ WADE (ABM)
VA| WALKERTON TIRE FIRE
WV| WALTER TAYLOR
PA I WESTINGHOUSE ELEVATOR CO.
PA| WESTLINE SITE
WV| WHEELING HILL
WV| YOKUM CHLORDANE CONTAMINATION
| GLEN MILLS/EDGE| N
ALDERSON
HAMPTON
KIRKWOOD
OLD ZIONSVILLE
ONA
WHEELING
ELLWOOD CITY BO N
BALTIMORE
POCOHONTAS COUN N
DANVILLE
OLD FORGE BOROU
LEETOWN
BALTIMORE
PITTSBURGH
POCA
MERCER COUNTY
ANNAPOLIS
MONROE COUNTY
NEW CASTLE CTY
MCKEAN COUNTY
MARION HEIGHTS
BLAIR COUNTY
BLAIR COUNTY
POTTSTOWN
BUCKS COUNTY
NOCKAMIXON TOWN
FREDERICK CTY
HUNTINGTON
BUCKS COUNTY
ELKTON
ALLEGHENY COUNT
MOUNT PLEASANT
BALTIMORE
CHESAPEAKE
HOLLYWOOD
CHAPTICO
CONEWANGO TWP
TYLER COUNTY
HARRISBURG
TAYLOR BOROUGH
CORAOPOLIS
FOLCROFT
WASHINGTON CTY
PHOENIXVILLE
NEW CASTLE CTY
UPPER MERION TW
BALTIMORE
BELTSVILLE
MORRISVILLE
CHESTER
KING & QUEEN CO
NITRO
GETTYSBURG
WESTLINE
WHEELING
PETERSBURG
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N*
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N*
N*
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N*
Y
N
N
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
Region 4
KY| A.L. TAYLOR (VALLEY OF THE DRUMS)
FL| ABANDONED DRUM
MS| ABANDONED DRUM SITE
FLJ ABANDONED DRUM/HILLSBOROUGH
FL| ABANDONED DRUM/MARATHON
NC| AHOSKIE MIDNIGHT DUMP
MSJ AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS (MS)
TN| AMERICAN CREOSOTE/JACKSON PLANT
FL| AMERICAN CREOSOTE/PENSACOLA
TN| ARLINGTON BLENDING
GAJ BARROW COUNTY DRUM SITE
FLJ BEACHED DRUM
MS j BERGERON MARINE
GAJ BERRIEN PRODUCTS
NC| BUCKHORN PESTICIDE FIRE
BROOKS
FORT PIERCE
JACKSON
TAMPA
MARATHON KEY
AHOSKIE
LOUISVILLE
JACKSON
PENSACOLA
ARLINGTON
BARROW COUNTY
COCOA BEACH
PEARLINGTON
NASHVILLE
BUCKHORN
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However, currently on proposed or final NPL.
35
-------
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
GA| BUFORD HIGHWAY
SC| BURKETT CYLINDER
NC| BUSH BROTHERS PLATING
SC| C.D. BUFF
NCJ CALDWELL COUNTY
AL| CALLAHAN DRUM
MS) CANTON PLATING & BUMPER WORKS
NC| CAPE FEAR WOOD PRESERVING
NC| CAPE HATTERAS NATIONAL SEASHORE
SC| CAROLAWN, INC.
NC| CAROLINA TRANSFORMER
GA| CASCADE ROAD
GA| CATOOSA COUNTY LABPACK
MS| CAUSTIC CHEMICAL
NC| CHEMTRONICS, INC.
ALJ CHURCH OF GOD PROPERTY
FL| CITY INDUSTRIES INC.
NC| CLAYTON BALLFIELD PESTICIDE
KY| COAL BRANCH HOLLOW
FLJ COLEMAN-EVANS WOOD PRES CO.
FL| CREOSOTE TANKS RELEASE (TALLEYRAND)
NC| DAVENPORT CREOSOTE SPILL
GAJ DAVIS FARM
KY| DISTLER BRICKYARD
KY| DISTLER FARM
NC| DOCKERY PROPERTY
NCJ DOT MAINTENANCE YARD
SC| DREYFUS STREET
SC| EARL ALLEN CHEMICAL SITES
GAJ EASTERN CHEMICAL CO.
NC| ELIZABETH CITY DRUM
NC| EVERHART LUMBER SITE
GAJ FT. OGLETHORPE DRUM
GA| GAIL FOSTER PROPERTY
TNJ GALLAWAY PITS
KYJ GEORGE O'BRYAN SITE
GA| GEORGIA HIGHWAY 138
NC| GILLCREST ROAD
MS I GULF BATTERY EXCHANGE
GA| HADAWAY ROAD
TN| HAMILL-HOOKER RD #3
KY| HARRISON
GA| HEAD PCB SPILL
PL) HIPPS ROAD LANDFILL
SCJ HORRY CO. FIREWORKS
GA| IVY ROAD (BESSIE RUNNER)
TN| J & L DRUM SITE
SC| JIMMY'S TRUCK STOP
GA| JOHNSON PROPERTY SITE
KY| KEITH FARM POND
GAJ LAKE KATHY ROAD SPILL
FL| LAKE WORTH INLET
NC| LENOIR REFINING
FL| LUMMIS ISLAND
NC| MACON PROPERTY
GA| MARIETTA ROAD
GA| MARZONE CHEMICAL CO.
ALJ MCALLISTER DRUM SITE
SC| MEDLEY FARM DRUM DUMP
MS) MIDNIGHT DUMP
KY| MIDNIGHT DUMPING (KY)
NCJ MIDNIGHT DUMPING/GUILFORD
TN| MILLER SITE
ALJ MOWBRAY ENGINEERING CO.
GA| NASHVILLE PESTICIDE SITE
MS| NATCHEZ DRUG SITE
SC| NATIONAL GALVANIZING
MSJ NESBIT SCALE HOUSE
ALJ NEWFOUND ROAD
MS| NEWSOME BROTHERS/OLD REICHOLD
GA| OLD LARAMORE LTD
NC| ONE-HOUR KORETIZING
SC| PALMETTO WOOD PRESERVING
GAJ PAYCO PALLET & DRUM
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However
36
DORAVILLE N
CHARLESTON N
REIDSVILLE N
UNA N
LENOIR N
PRATTVILLE N
CANTON N
FAYETTEVILLE N*
RODANTHE N
FORT LAWN Y
FAYETTEVILLE N
ATLANTA N
FT. OGLETHORPE N
WOODVILLE N
SWANNANOA Y
MOODY N
ORLANDO N*
CLAYTON N
GREENUP N
WHITEHOUSE Y
JACKSONVILLE N
PINETOPS N
NICKELSVILLE N
WEST POINT N*
JEFFERSON COUNT Y
CORDOVA N
SHALLOTTE N
COLUMBIA N
NORTH AUGUSTA N
LITHONIA N
ELIZABETH CITY N
NEW BERN N
FT. OGLETHORPE N
WADLEY N
GALLAWAY Y
LOUISVILLE N
CLAYTON COUNTY N
WAKE FOREST N
FOUNTAINBLEAU N
KENNESAW N
CHATTANOOGA N
CYNTHIANA N
COMMERCE N
DUVAL COUNTY Y
MYRTLE BEACH N
ATLANTA N
MEMPHIS N
ORANGEBURG N
STOCKBRIDGE N
BOWLING GREEN N
DALTON N
LAKE WORTH INLE N
LENOIR N
PORT OF MIAMI N
CORDOVA N
ATLANTA N
TIFTON N
ASHVILLE N
GAFFNEY N*
MCHENRY COUNTY N
HENDERSONVILLE N
GUILFORD N
ROAN MOUNTAIN N
GREENVILLE N*
NASHVILLE N
NATCHEZ N
TRAVELER'S REST N
NESBIT N
MT. OLIVE N
COLUMBIA N*
LEESBURG N
DURHAM N
DIXIANNA Y
ELLENWOOD N
, currently on proposed or
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
final NPL.
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
FL| PCB MIDNIGHT DUMP
FL| PEMBROKE PINES
FLJ PEPPER STEEL & ALLOYS, INC.
AL| PETRO CHEMICAL
FLJ PETROLEUM PRODUCTS (PEMBROKE RD)
FL| PIONEER SAND CO
MSj PLASTIFAX, INC.
NCJ PLYMOUTH WOOD TREATMENT
NC| POTTERS PITS
SCJ REIMER DRUM
GAJ ROCK BRIDGE PARK
GA| ROME COAL TAR
GAJ ROOSEVELT HIGHWAY SPILL
NC| ROUTE 211 PESTICIDE SITE
MSj S. ELECTROFORMING
NC| SALVAGE OIL OF AMERICA
GA| SALVO PROPERTY
NCJ SAMPSON COUNTY DUMPSTER
FL| SAND KEY
NC| SCOTTS CREEK BATTERY
GAJ SIMPSON ROAD DRUM
KY| SMITH'S FARM
FLJ SNAPPER LANE
MS| SONFORD PRODUCTS
NC| SOUTH RIVERDALE DRIVE
MS I SOUTHERN LUMBER CO.
FL| ST. JOHN RIVER
GA| SWAINSBORO PRINTWORKS
FLJ TOWER CHEMICAL CO.
FLJ TRI-CITY OIL CONSERVATIONIST, INC
GA| U.S. CUSTOMS PESTICIDE
FLJ UNKNOWN CHEMICAL DISCHARGE
NCJ US HIGHWAY 1 TRUCK SITE
GA| VILLA RICA-HIGH POINT RD
NC| WESTERN CAROLINA SMELTING
FL| WHITEHOUSE OIL PITS
KYJ WHITLEY COUNTY
FL| WILLIAMS PESTICIDE SITE
GA| WOODWARD MILL ROAD
FL| YELLOW WATER ROAD DUMP
BALDWIN
HOLLYWOOD
MEDLEY
ATHENS
HALLANDALE
WARRINGTON
GULFPORT
PLYMOUTH
MACO
BATH
DEKALB COUNTY
ROME
COLLEGE PARK
ABERDEEN
KOSCIUSKO
ROCKINGHAM
LITHIA SPRINGS
ROSEBORO
BISCAYNE BAY
NEW BERN
ATLANTA
BROOKS
KEY LARGO
JACKSON
DURHAM
CROSBY
JACKSONVILLE
SWAINSBORO
CLERMONT
TAMPA
SAVANNAH
TAMPA
VASS
DOUGLAS COUNTY
MADISON COUNTY
WHITEHOUSE
SILER
ST. JOHNS COUNT
BUFORD
BALDWIN
N
N
N*
N
N
Y
N*
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N*
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
K
N*
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
Region 5
IL| A & F MATERIALS RECLAIMING
ILJ ABANDONED DRUM
INj ABANDONED DRUM-OHIO RIVER
MIj ABANDONED DRUMS-ECORSE
OHj AEROQUIP/REPUBLIC HOSE
ILJ ALBURN INCINERATOR
OH| AMERICAN STEEL DRUM
OHj ANACONDA ROAD SITE
INj BENNETT STONE QUARRY
MI| BERLIN & FARRO
IN| BLOOMINGTON CAPACITOR SITE
IL| BLUE CYANIDE CHIPS
MNJ BOW CHEMICAL
Wlj C-WAY
OHj CHEM-DYNE
MI I CHEMICAL DRUM
OH| CHEMICAL MINERALS RECLAMATION
ILJ CHICAGO DRUM
ILJ CYANIDE INCIDENT
ILJ DANVILLE PLATING
ILJ DEAD CREEK
IN| DOWDEN LANDFILL
MIj DRUMS ON BEACH
MI| DUELL AND GARDNER LANDFILL
MI I EAST BAY SITE
IN I ELKHART SITE
IN| ENVIROCHEM CORP.
IL| FLOYD HUTTER
MIj FORT & SCOTTEN STREETS
INj GARY DOG POUND
ILJ GEBHART FERTILIZER
OH I GP & K, INC.
GREENUP
EAST ST. LOUIS
OHIO RIVER
ECORSE
YOUNGSTOWN
CHICAGO
BEDFORD
AKRON
BLOOMINGTON
SWARTZ CREEK
BLOOMINGTON
CHICAGO
ST PAUL PARK
SPENCER
HAMILTON
HESSEL
CLEVELAND
CHICAGO
CHICAGO
DANVILLE
SAUGET
FORTVILLE
MANISTIQUE
DALTON TOWNSHIP
TRAVERSE CITY
ELKHART
ZIONSVILLE
WILL COUNTY
DETROIT
GARY
LATHAM
MENTOR
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N*
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However, currently on proposed or final NPL.
37
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
OH| GREINERS LAGOON
IL| HIXON PLATING
OH I HYTECH CHROME
IN| 1-69
IN| INDIANA REFINERY
MI| INTERNATIONAL DISC CORP
MN| ISANTI SOLVENT SITES
OHJ J.C. HAYNES
OH| J.V. PETERS
INI LAKE SANDY JO (H&M LANDFILL)
ILJ LASALLE ELECTRIC UTILITIES
OH I LASKIN/POPLAR OIL CO.
MNJ LEHILLIER/MANKATO SITE
IN I LEMON LANE LANDFILL
MI| LIQUID DISPOSAL, INC
ILJ LIQUID DYNAMICS
INj MEYERS DUMP
OH I MICHIGAN CITY DRUMS
IN I MIDCO I
MI I MIDNIGHT DUMPING-DETROIT
IN| MIDWEST PLATING
MIj MILLPOINT (SPRING LAKE)
MI I NILES TOWNSHIP
MI| NORTHERNAIRE PLATING
WI| OAK CREEK
OH| OLD MILL
MI| OTT/STORY/CORDOVA
MI| PBM ENTERPRISES
MI| PEERLESS PLATING
IN| POER FARM
INj R.J. TRUCKING
OH| RASER TANNERY
MI| RASMUSSEN'S DUMP
Wlj RODGERS LABORATORIES
MI| ROSE TOWNSHIP DUMP
MN| RUMPLE JUNKYARD
MII SAGINAW PAINTING CO
Wlj SCHMALZ DUMP
OH| SEAWAY WAREHOUSE
IN| SEYMOUR RECYCLING CORP.
OHj SKILJAN/DIAL
IL| SORRENTO SITE
Wlj SPECTRO CHEMICAL
MNJ ST LOUIS RIVER
INJ STEEL CONTAINER
ILJ STEWART DRUM
OH| SUMMIT NATIONAL
OHJ T. P. LONG
MNJ UNION SCRAP IRON AND METAL CO.
OHJ UNITED SCRAP LEAD CO
IL| US SCRAP
OH| VALLEYWOOD SUBDIVISION
OHJ W.58TH STREET DRUM SITE
OHJ WADE PARK CHEMICALS (ABANDONED CHEM|
WI| WAUSAU GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION I
FREMONT
BUSHNELL
LOGAN
FISHERS
PRINCETON
ELLSWORTH
ISANTI COUNTY
NEWARK
MIDDLEFIELD
GARY
LASALLE
JEFFERSON TOWNS
LEHILLIER/MANKA
BLOOMINGTON
UTICA
SOUTHSIDE CHICA
SOUTH BEND
MICHIGAN CITY
GARY
DETROIT
LOGANSPORT
SPRING LAKE
NILES TOWNSHIP
CADILLAC
OAK CREEK
ROCK CREEK
DALTON TOWNSHIP
ROMULUS
MUSKEGON
HANCOCK COUNTY
PRINCETON
ASHTABULA
GREEN OAK TOWNS
MILWAUKEE
ROSE TOWNSHIP
ISANTI
SAGINAW
HARRISON
WASHINGTON COUR
SEYMOUR
CLEVELAND
SORRENTO
OREGON
DULUTH HARBOR
HAMMOND
CHICAGO
DEERFIELD TWP
AKRON
MINNEAPOLIS
TROY
CHICAGO
VALLEYWOOD
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
WAUSAU
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N*
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N*
N
N
N*
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N*
N
N
N
N
N
N
N*
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N*
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
Region 6
TX| 301 MAIN STREET
TXJ ACRYLONITRIL SPILL
TXJ AGGIE CHEMICAL
TXJ AMOCO DOCK 31
NMJ ARGENT CORPORATION
LAJ BARGE STAR 7
TXJ BARKER CHEMICAL
TX| BIO-ECOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
TX| CARGO SHIP EXPLOSION
TX| CHEMICAL DRUMS - PADRE ISLAND
LAJ CLEVE REBER
TXJ CRYSTAL CHEMICAL CO
TXJ CRYSTAL CITY AIRPORT
OKJ DUNCAN TRANSFORMER SITE
TXJ FRENCH, LTD.
SOUTH HOUSTON
TEXAS CITY
SAN ANTONIO
GALVESTON
RIO RANCHO
LAROSE
GRANDVIEW
GRAND PRAIRIE
HOUSTON
BROWNSVILLE
SORRENTO
HOUSTON
CRYSTAL CITY
DUNCAN
CROSBY
TX| GENEVA IND/FURHMANN ENERGY m^m , HOUSTON
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N*
N
Y
Y
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
TRANS PORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
*NOTE: Non-r' n proposed or final NPL.
38
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION'
OK| HADDOCK AIRPORT
TX| HIGHLANDS ACID PIT
TXJ HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
OK| JACK DENNIS PESTICIDE BURNSITE
TX| MATAGORDA ISLAND
TX| MIDNIGHT DUMP
TXJ MOTCO, INC.
TX| NEAR WILLS POINT
LA| OLD INGER OIL REFINERY
TX| PADRE & MUSTANG ISLANDS I
TX| PADRE & MUSTANG ISLANDS II
TX| PADRE & MUSTANG ISLANDS III
TXJ PADRE ISLAND IV (LEGUNA MADRE)
TX| PANTHER CREEK
TX| PESSES CHEMICAL
TX| PETRO-CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
NM| PRONTO SERVICES
NM| S VALLEY PCB TANK SITE
TX| SHIP CHANNEL
TX| SIKES DISPOSAL PITS
TX| SOUTH ACRES
TX| SOUTH OF WACO
TX| STEWCO, INC
LA| STONEWALL DRUG DUMP
TX| STYRENE SPILL
OK| TAR CREEK (OTTAWA COUNTY)
TXJ TRIANGLE CHEMICAL CO.
LA| W.J. OIL CO
OK| WHEATLAND DRUM
TXJ WINKLER ROAD
ERRICK
HIGHLANDS
HOUSTON
MIDWEST CITY
GULF COAST
PORT ARTHUR
LA MARQUE
VAN ZANDT COUNT
DARROW
GULF COAST
GULF COAST
GULF COAST
GULF COAST
GALLENO PARK
FORT WORTH
LIBERTY COUNTY
ALBUQUERQUE
ALBUQUERQUE
HOUSTON
CROSBY
SOUTH HOUSTON
MCCLENNAN COUNT
WASKOM
STONEWALL
TEXAS CITY
OTTAWA COUNTY
BRIDGE CITY
LAROSE
OKLAHOMA CITY
PEARLAND
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
.N
N
N
N*
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N*
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
Region 7
IA| AIDEX CORP.
MO j BLISS/FRONTENAC
MO| BLUE RIVER FLOOD
MO| CASHEL PROPERTY
MO| COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH
IAJ CURTIS ANIMAL PRODUCTS
NE| ECONOMY PRODUCTS
MO I ELLISVILLE SITE (CALLAHAN)
NEJ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
MO| ERWIN FARM
MOj FLOOD DAMAGE
MO| FRANKLIN/GIMBLIN ST
MO| HOLLY STREET DRUM SITE
KS| JOHN'S REFINERY
MOj LACY MANOR DRIVE
NE| MARCY STREET
MOj MEXICO FEED & SEED
MO I NEOSHO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SCHOOL
MOj NORTH-U DRIVE WELL CONTAMINATION
KS| RICHMOND STREET DRUM
MO I ROCKWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
MOj ROSE CHEMICAL
MO I RUSHA FARM
MOj SOLID STATE CIRCUITS
MO| SULLINS RESIDENCE
MOj TALLEY FARM
MO I THOLOZAN STREET SITE
MO| VALLEY GARDEN DRIVE
Region 8
COUNCIL BLUFFS
FRONTENAC
KANSAS CITY
JEFFERSON COUNT
MANCHESTER
CORNING
OMAHA
ELLISVILLE
OMAHA
VERONA
ST. LOUIS
ST. LOUIS
KANSAS CITY
WICHITA
JEFFERSON COUNT
OMAHA
MEXICO
NEOSHO
SPRINGFIELD
KANSAS CITY
ST LOUIS
HOLDEN
LAWRENCE COUNTY
REPUBLIC
JEFFERSON CTY
LAWRENCE COUNTY
ST. LOUIS
KANSAS CITY
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
CO| CALIFORNIA GULCH - MAESTES WELL
CO| DENVER RADIUM-B&C METALS
CO I EAGLE MINE
WY| ELLERBY REFINING SITE
CO j FREJONLEY
CO| GENE MURREN
ND| GRAND FORKS DRUM SITE
UT| GREEN RIVER CYANIDE
SD| HELDT CHEMICAL (SD SERVICES)
UTJ MONTGOMERY WARD STORE
MTJ MOTHERLODE FACILITY
CO I PDC SPAS
LEADVILLE
DENVER
MINTURN/REDCLIF
MORTON
ROUTT COUNTY
ERIE COUNT
GRAND FORKS
EMERY CITY
BROOKINGS
MONTICELLO
EAST HELENA
JEFFERSON COUNT]
Y
Y
N*
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
OTHER
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
*NOTE: Non-NPL site at initiation of removal. However, currently on proposed or final NPL.
39
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
08| UT| RANDALL RESIDENCE
081 WYJ TRUCK ACCIDENT
08j ND| VAAGAN-DAHLE FARM
08| CO| WOODBURY CHEMICAL CO
MONTICELLO | N
ARLINGTON j N
CARPIO I N
COMMERCE CITY I Y
OTHER
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
Region 9
09| CA| ABANDONED DRUM
09j CAJ ABANDONED DRUM
09| CA| ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST
09| CAJ ARNOLD WEED CONTROL SITE
09| ASj ASPA POWER PLANT
09| NV| BIG SPRING RANCH
091 CAJ BLOOMFIELD AVENUE
09| CAJ BROWN'S FIELD SITE
09j CAJ CHEROKEE TRUCKING
09j CA| COPPEROPOLIS SITE
09| CA| CRYSTAL COVE BEACH
09j NVJ CYANIDE SPILL
09| CA| DIXCO CHEMICAL SALES
09j CAJ DRAINAGE DITCH
09) NV| ECHO BAY STATION
09j CAJ EL MONTE SITE
091 HI I F/V VICTORIA II KEEHI LAGOON
09| CA| FLOATING DRUM
091 CAJ GENERAL DISPOSAL
09| AZ| GILA RIVER INDIAN RESERVATION
09| CA| L. FRICKER CO.
09j CAJ LAGUNA BEACH ll
09| CA| LONG BEACH DRUM
091 CA| MCCOLL
09| CA| MYSTERY DUMP
09| CA| N TULIP ST.- ESCONDIDO
09| CA| NICKEL SOLUTION RECYCLING
09| CA| NORWALK DRUM SITE
091 CA| PARKSIDE DRIVE
09| HI| PCB TRANSFORMERS
09) TTJ PCB WASTES (1-UNIVERSITY OF GUAM)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (11-HARMON)
09 | TTJ PCB. WASTES (13-GPA/NAVAL STATION)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (14-CNMI PCB)
09| TTJ PCB WASTES (15-SAIPAN)
09j TTJ PCB WASTES (16-PALAU)
091 TTJ PCB WASTES (17-MARSHALL ISLAND)
09 I TT| PCB WASTES (18-GUAM DEPT. OF PUB HE
09| TT| PCB WASTES (19-MARSHALL ISLAND)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (2-UNIVERSITY OF GUAM)
09| TTJ PCB WASTES (20-MARSHALL ISLAND)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (21-EBEYE PUB)
091 TTJ PCB WASTES (25-PONAPE ELECT)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (26-PONAPE)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (27-PONAPE DPFOR)
09j TT| PCB WASTES (28-PONAPE)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (29-KOSRAE)
09j TTJ PCB WASTES (3-GUAM MEMORIAL HOSPITA
091 TTJ PCB WASTES (30-TRUK)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (32-YAP)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (33-YAP)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (4-GUAM PUBLIC HOSPITAL)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (5-GUAM DEPT OF AGRICULT
091 TT| PCB WASTES (7-GUAM DEPT OF ECONOMIC
09| TT| PCB WASTES (8-GUAM PHYS)
09| TTJ PCB WASTES (9-GUAM PHL)
09| TT| PCB WASTES (A-GUAM DEPT OF EDUCATIO
09| TT| PCB WASTES (B-DELA CRUZ)
09j TTJ PCB WASTES (C-MAJURO HOSP)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (D-MEDICAL CLINIC)
091 TT| PCB WASTES (F-PROT YAP)
091 TTJ PCB WASTES (G-USCG LORAN)
09| HI| PIER 35
09| CAJ PURITY OIL SALES, INC.
091 CA| ROIC-SUN VALLEY
09) CAJ SACRAMENTO RIVER
09| AS| SATALA POWER PLANT
09| CA| SOUTH HALF MOON BAY
09| CAJ STANDARD CHEMICAL CO
CARLSBAD N
ANTIOCH N
PASADENA N
RIVERSIDE N
PAGO PAGO N
SHAFTER N
SANTA FE SPRING N
CHULA VISTA N
LOS ANGELES N
COPPEROPOLIS N
SAN ONOFRE N
GLENDALE N
ANAHEIM N
MOUNTAIN VIEW N
LAKE MEAD N
EL MONTE N
OAHU N
LOS ANGELES N
SANTA FE SPRING N
MARICOPA COUNTY N
ANAHEIM N
ORANGE CTY N
LONG BEACH N
FULLERTON Y
SACRAMENTO N
ESCONDIDO N
LOS ANGELES N
NORWALK N
SALTON SEA N
OAHU | N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST TJ Y
PACIFIC TRUST TJ Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST T| Y
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST TJ N
PACIFIC TRUST T| N
HONOLULU N
MALAGA Y
SUN VALLEY N
SACRAMENTO N
PAGO PAGO N
SAN MATED COUNT| N
HUNTINGTON I N
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
40
-------
ST NAME
LOCATION
NPL INCIDENT CATEGORY
CA| STRINGFELLOW ACID PITS
AS| TAFUNA POWER PLANT
ASJ TAPUTIMU FARM
CA| TECATE SITE
AZ| THE CHROME SHOP
AZJ TUBA CITY ACID TANK
CA| UNKNOWN CHEMICAL DRUMS
NVJ WASHOE DRUM
CA| WESTERN STATES REFINING
CAJ YUCAIPA DRUG LAB
GLEN AVON HGTS
AMERICAN SAMOA
TUTUILA
TECATE
TUCSON
COPPER MINE
LACUNA BEACH
RENO
FONTANA
SAN BERNARDINO
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
Region 10
WA| ABANDONED DRUM
WA| AMERICAN SURPLUS
ID I ARRCOM (DREXLER ENTERPRISES)
AKJ BENDLE'S ROAD OILING CO.
ID) BUNKER HILL MINING AND METALLURGY
ID| COMEBACK MINE
ID| EMMITT PCB
WAJ LITTLE LEAGUE PESTICIDE
WA| MARROWSTONE ISLAND
ID I MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
ORJ NORTHWEST DUST CONTROL
WAJ NORTHWEST TRANSFORMER
AK| OHLSON MOUNTAIN PCB SITE
ID I PACIFIC HIDE & FUR RECYCLING
WA| PCB CONTAMINATION
WAj SPOKANE DRUM FIRE
OR) UNION AVE PCB SITE
ORI UNITED CHROME PRODUCTS INC.
WA| WESTERN PROCESSING CO., INC.
WA| WILLIAMS & SON
KALAMA
TACOMA
RATHDRUM
CHUGIAK
SMELTERVILLE
PIONEERVILLE
EMMITT
ORCHARD
PUGET SOUND
POCATELLO
WHITE CITY
EVERSON
HOMER
POCATELLO
WOODENVILLE
SPOKANE
PORTLAND
CORVALLIS
KENT
BUCADA
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
MIDNIGHT DUMP
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
OTHER
OTHER
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
INACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
MIDNIGHT DUMP
MIDNIGHT DUMP
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED
INACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
ACTIVE PRODUCTION FACILITY
EPA
Superfund Offices
For further information, call toll free
1-800-424-9346
or the EPA Superfund Offices listed below
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Emergency & Remedial Response
(WH-548E)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, B.C. 20460
CML: (202) 475-8103
FTS: 475-8103
EPA Region 1
Waste Management Division
JFK Federal Building
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
CML: (617)565-3698
FTS: 835-3715
EPA Region 2
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
26 Federal Plaza, Room 1009
New York, New York 10278
CML: (212) 264-3082
FTS: 264-3082
EPA Region 3
Hazardous Waste Management Division
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19106
CML: (215) 597-8131
FTS: 597-8131
EPA Region 4
Waste Management Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
CML: (404) 881-3454
FTS: 257-3454
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library
Street
EPA Region 5
Waste Management Division
230 South Dearborn Street, 12th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60604
CML: (312) 886-7579
FTS: 886-7579
EPA Region 6
Hazardous Waste Management Division
First International Building
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, Texas 75270
CML: (214) 767-2730
FTS: 729-2730
EPA Region 7
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, Missouri 66101
CML: (913) 236-2850
FTS: 757-2850
EPA Region 8
Waste Management Division
One Denver Place
999 18th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202-2413
CML: (303) 293-1720
.FTS: 564-1720
EPA Region 9
Toxics and Waste Management Division
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
CML: (415) 974-7460
FTS: 454-7460
EPA Region 10
Hazardous Waste Division
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
CML: (206) 442-1906
FTS: 399-1906
-------
U.S Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library * y
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Httnofs 60604
------- |