5664
                                                      905R83119
                           STUDIES OF SEDIMENT, NUTRIENT
                         AND PESTICIDE LOADING IN  SELECTED
                      LAKE ERIE AND LAKE ONTARIO TRIBUTARIES
                                Draft Final  Report
                          U.  S.  EPA Grant No.  R005708-01
                                      Part V
                       Sediment and Nutrient Loading  Summary
           Submitted to:
                             Mr.  Clifford Risley,  Jr.
                                  Project Officer
                       U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Region V
                              536 South Clark Street
                             Chicago, Illinois  60605
           u.s. *:•/•<-.     , ;.
           RC-g.^n  .-  ;   . 
-------
.',o.  Environments!  Protection Agency

-------
                               CONTENTS
TABLES 	   i

FIGURES	ii

INTRODUCTION	   1

METHODS  	   4

   Sample Collection 	   4
   Analytical Methods  	   4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION   	   6

   Analytical Results  	   6
   Runoff Patterns for the 1982 Water Year	   7
   Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations	16
   Nutrient and Sediment Loading 	  18

CONCLUSIONS	23

RECOMMENDATIONS	23

REFERENCES	25

-------
                                  TABLES
Number                                                                 Page
        Station codes, flows, sampling dates and numbers of samples
          analyzed for the 1982 water year tributary loading program .   5

        Flux weighted and time weighted mean concentrations at the
          transport stations for the 1982 water year	17

        Nutriattand sediment loads at the transport stations for
          the 1982 water year	19

        Unit area nutrient and sediment yields at the transport
          stations for the 1982 water year	21

-------
                                  FIGURES



Number                                                                  Page


  1     Locations of the 1982 tributary monitoring stations  in the
          Lake Erie Basin	2

  2     Locations of the 1982 tributary monitoring stations  in the
          Lake Ontario Basin  	   3

                         3       2
  3     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Raisin River for the 1982 water year	8

                         3       2
  4     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Maumee River for the 1982 water year	9

                         3       2
  5     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at Honey Creek for the 1982 water year	10

                         3       2
  6     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Sandusky River for the 1982 water year  ....  11

                         3       2
  7     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Cuyahoga River for the 1982 water year  ....  12

                         3       2
  8     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Genesee River for the 1982 water year	13

                         3       2
  9     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Oswego River for the 1982 water year	14
                         3       2
 10     Unit area flow (m /sec/km ) and total phosphorus concentration
          (mg/L) at the Black River for the 1982 water year	15

-------
INTRODUCTION








     Tributaries comprise the major pathway by  which  many  pollutants   enter




Lake Erie  and  Lake  Ontario.   Accurate tributary loading data are  therefore




essential to develop accurate total pollutant loading data  for  these   lakes.




Accurate total  loading  data  are  necessary  to  establish the relationships



between pollutant loadings and resulting water  quality  and  to  subsequently




develop and  refine  target loads which should result in meeting water quality




objectives.  Accurate tributary loading data also reflect the effectiveness  of




pollution abatement programs within the tributary watersheds..




     For the 1982 water year, the Great Lakes National Program Office  (GLNPO)




of the  U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency  supported  a special  tributary




loading study for the  major  tributaries  of  Lake  Erie  and  Lake  Ontario.




Loading studies  were  also conducted at the Honey Creek Tillage Demonstration




Watershed in Seneca  and  Crawford  counties,  Ohio.   The  locations  of the




tributary loading stations are shown in Figures 1 and 2.




     In this part  of  the  final  report,  loading  data  for  nutrients and



sediments will  be  presented.   Previous parts of the final report have  dealt



with pesticide loading (Baker, 1983a), bioavailable phosphorus loading (Baker,



1983b), Monte Carlo analyses of  sampling  strategies,  (Richards,  1983)  and



Honey  Creek tillage surveys (Krieger, 1983).

-------

-------
 to
 a
s
 0)
 in


 0
•H


ti
-P
 (0
CN
CO
 (D

5
 (0
 c
 o
 o
3
fN


 0)
•H

fe

-------
METHODS








Sample Collection




     All of the samples were  collected at or  near  the   U.S.  Geological  Survey




stream gaging  stations  listed  in Table 1.   At the stations located in Ohio,




automatic samplers (ISCO Model   1680  or  equivalent)   were   used   to  collect




discrete samples  at  six  hour  intervals.    During periods of high flow,  all




samples were analyzed, whereas,  during  low   flow,  one  sample  per  day  was




analyzed.  Details  of  our   use of  automatic samplers  for tributary loading



studies have been described elsewhere (Baker,  1983c).




     At the Michigan and New  York  stations   local  observers  were  used   to




collect grab samples.  Samples were refrigerated and shipped to the  laboratory




at weekly  intervals.   The number of samples  collected at each station,  along




with the inclusive sampling dates, are listed  in Table  1.
Analytical Methods




     All samples were analyzed for soluble reactive  phosphorus   (SRP),   total




phosphorus (TP),  suspended   solids  (SS), nitrate + nitrite  nitrogen  (N02.3),




total Kjeldahl nitrogen  (TKN), dissolved silica   (Si02),   chloride   (CL),   and




conductivity (Cond.).    In   addition,  ammonia  analyses   were   run  on  weekly



samples for the four Ohio stations.  These samples were filtered at  the  time



of  sample collection.




     The analytical methods  have been described in detail  in  quality assurance




materials submitted to the Quality Assurance Office, Region V, U.S. EPA.    The




following documents contain  information on both analytical methods and related




quality control results:

-------

%
9>
J*

Vi
0
4J
£
CM
CO
CTI
rH
0)
Jc
4J

Vl
o
*M

•O
0
N
£
1
n
9
rH

§
n
ii_j
*W
o
n

9
*g
§
C

T/
g
a
0)
• 1
^
•o

$
•H
iH
(D
*
CO
Is
* &
w
a 8
Wl M
v ft
Is-
•H
C 13
O a
•H O
•P rH

Table 1. 'St
tributary

0
CM
CO
1
rH
O
O
rH
rH
CO



CTI
CM
rH
•
O





CO
in
H
•
O



VO
CO
CO



0
0
rH
r»
CTl
rH
^*
O







*
Honey Creek
Melmore, OH




T





o
CO
CM
o
CM
00
1
H
O
o
H
rH
CO



CTi
t^
00
•
o





o
CTI
co
•
H



O
<*
CM
ro


O
O
0
8
rH
^t
0






M
0) .
Sandusky Riv
Fremont , OH


t^
T
^T





O
co
CT.
O
CM
00
1
T
O
rH
rH
rH
CO



VO
CM
r~
O





O
CM
CTI
*




H
co
CO
H


O
o
o
CO
o
CM
^*
^j
O


•
X
0

n -
0) <0
Cuyahoga Riv
Independence


VO
m






CM
O
r-
o
CM
CO
1
t^
rH
CM
O
CM
CO



^r
CO
^
•
CM





CM
VO
co

CO



^
vo
co
vo


o
o
o
CM
CO
CM
^t
O






^
u fe
Gene see Rive:
Rochester, 1


CM
in






CO
CM
VO
O
CM
00
1
VO
rH
CM
O
CM
CO



rH
rH
O
•
VO





in
i-H
r~
*
VO



CTi
O
CM
CO
rH

O
O
O
CTi
T
CM
•31
XT
O








Oswego River
Oswego , NY


rH
VO






CO
CM
VO
0
CM
CO
1
VO
rH
CM
0
CM
CO



VO
r~
in
•
CO





CM
in
CTI
*
CO



CTI
in
CO
%
rr


o
o
in
§

-------
1.  Baker, David B.  January 1981.  "Quality  Assurance   Program   for  Detailed
     Tributary Loading  Studies in Event Response  Rivers."   Submitted  to James
     H.  Adams, Chief, Quality Assurance Office, Region  V,  U.S.  EPA.


2.  Baker, David B.  March 1982.  "The Effects of  Sample Storage for One  Week
     Without   Preservation  on   Soluble   Reactive     Phosphorus      Loading
     Measurements."  Submitted  to  David   Payne,   Quality   Assurance   Office,
     Region V,  U.S. EPA  and  Marcella  Gewirth,  Great  Lakes  National Program
     Office, Region V, U.S. EPA.


3.  Baker, David B.  June 1982.  Quality Assurance Program  Update -   Responses
     to the  April  16,  1982  Report  by   the Region V,  EPA Quality Assurance
     Office on its On-Site Evaluation  of   the  Water  Quality  Laboratory  of
     Heidelberg College,  Tiffin,  Ohio.    Submitted  to the Quality Assurance
     Office, Region V, U.S. EPA,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION



Analytical Results

     All of the analytical results for the  1982 water year have  been  placed  in

the STORET system using the  U.S. Geological   Survey  station   identifications

shown in  Table  1.   A  copy  of archive printouts from our laboratory's data

system containing all of the 1982 data is included in  the  appendix   to  this

report.  The  formats  for our archive printout have been described previously

(Baker, 1983c).  A copy of our archive printout has also been  sent directly  to

Dr. John Clark  of  the  International  Joint  Commission  (IJC)   in   Windsor,

Ontario, for use in calculating  IJC loading estimates for the  1982 water year.

-------
Runoff Patterns for the  1982 Water  Year




     The total discharge  for the  1982  water  year  was higher than the long term

average discharge at all  eight  of the  stations (Table 1).    For  most  of  the

streams, highest  discharges  occurred in  March during a snowmelt period.  For

the Black River in New York  the  peak  snowmelt   runoff  occurred  in  April.

Unusually heavy  snow  accumulations in  southeastern Michigan and northwestern

Ohio resulted in extensive spring flooding of  the Raisin and Maumee rivers.

     In Figues 3-10, the  unit area  discharges  and  the  chetnographs  of  total

phosphorus for  the  1982 water year are shown.   Runoff patterns for suspended

solids parallel the total phosphorus chetnographs.  For the  Michigan  and  New

York streams,  the  daily discharges were  shown for the entire water year even

though the chemical sampling programs  encompassed only a portion of the  water

year.  For  the  Ohio streams,  the  cheraographs and hydrographs both extend for

the entire water year.  Any gaps  in   the  chemical  record,  due  to  sampler

malfunction, are  also  shown   as  gaps  in the hydrograph  records for the Ohio

stations.

     The graphs of Figures 3-10   nicely  illustrate  the  differences  between

event-response and  stable-response rivers.  For  stable-response streams, such

as the Oswego and Black rivers  (Figures  9  and  10),  changes in  discharge  rate

are not  accompanied  by  large   changes  in   phosphorus  concentrations.   In

event-response rivers, such as  the  Maumee, Sandusky and  Cuyahoga  rivers  and

Honey Creek (Figures U-7), periods  of  increased runoff are accompanied by very

large increases  in  phosphorus concentrations.   The Raisin and Genesee rivers

are intermediate in that  runoff events in  these   streams  are  accompanied  by
v
smaller increases  in  nutrient   concentrations than are the Ohio streams.  As

will be noted subsequently, the unit area  phosphorus loads are much higher for

-------
                                  T
                            4
        4
                                           CD
                                            I

                                           a. §
                                             0
                                             o
                                             0

                                             a
                                             EO
                                             C
                                           e

                                             s
                                             «
                                             o
                                             0)
                                             B
M01J V3dV UNO
0 e   0 0
          1V101
  •p >1
h" ~*
U D 0)
O  •£

  r;s
   fN
  a co

-------
£'0
                        \
                                i
                                0)
                                 o>

                                 4-1
                                 0
                                 •rl

                                 8
                                 H
                                 s

                                 8
                                 to
                                 2

                                 I
                                 CO
                                 5
                                 0
                                 4J
                                 O
                                 0)
                                 0]
                                 s
                                  *^

                               5i|
vaav UNO
0>   02  00
  SnyOHdOSHd  1V101  5
                                  CO
                                  0»

                                 S M

-------
   UJ
   CM
   CO
   0>
   M

   O
   UJ
   Cg
UJ
   UJ
   UJ
o

UJ
£"0
                       to
0'

0

                                   0 "0
                                                u>
                                              
-------
£•0   3-0   r'0
   MOIJ V3av UNO
     02  0
0
                    u>
                    i
                      o
                      14

                      £
                      K



                      JK
        «J
        ffi
                      c
                      c
                      3
                      £
                      C
                      4J
                      C
                      •U

                      •a
                      o
                      e
                      E
                      t-f
                      «4

                      C
                    fc
                    o
  snaoHdsoHd ivioi
.-«
 C>4
O CO
»-, en
3 rH
CT
11

-------

     02   0 "0
              ivioi
                    i:
                     0
                     »j
                     1
                     c
                     o
                     4J
                     O
                     O

                     §
                     O
                     2
                     01
                     0
                     o
                     -p
                     o
                     »
                     CD
                    i
                      5,
                      9

                      I
« S
12

-------
eg

UJ
CJ
00
s
a
UJ
LU


LJ
0
                     UJ
                     o
                     o
                                       •
                                T*
                                        *
0't   
                           CO
                                                    00
                        13

-------
01
ffi
CO
00
o>
c*
UJ

M
UJ


o
     4
           •*

0   2"0   l"0       0"
 MOTd V3aV  UNO
                                 J
                                 I
                                 V
                                 J
                                 «
                                 I

                                 I
                                 I
                                 i
                                 i
                                 I
                                 I
r»
4
                                           I
                                         i!

                m
                3

               ' O
                                           m
                                           C
                                           O
                                           4J

                                           •o
                                           c
                                           0)

              g
                                           o
                                           o
                                           m
                                          -
                                         ^ U-l


                                          (y

                                          0) .
                          02   0 0
                      snaoHdsoHd ivioi
£ )H
10 
-------

•


4


,
*
•
1
• *
1
1
1
1
1
1
i «
1
1
1
1
•
4
1


••


4
I I
J ^y • '•« ^v *'^V
I ^
£
tD n
3 •
< 3
^
o
^ «
4J

= 3
tr
51
21 -P
2
gi
< 8
at
*> B
^ °
o
a
ffil
U. -P
•o
Z _
o
9)
(0
UJ ^
0
0
O «
S
•P 0)
•H >,
H: D n
o . U
O 5
(1) CD
snaoHdsoHd  ivioi
                    •H
                    CM
15

-------
event-response rivers than for  stable-response  streams.   It  is  evident  from

the graphs  of  Figures  3-10   that  much  more  frequent sample collection is

necessary to quantify nutrient  export  from   event-response  streams  than  for

stable-response streams.   Sampling  requirements   for  the Sandusky River have

been analyzed using Monte Carlo techniques  and  are   discussed  in  a  separate

report (Richards, 1983).
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations

     The flux  weighted  mean   concentration   and   the   time   weighted   mean

concentration for  each parameter  at  each station  are shown in Table 2.  These

concentrations are calculated  as  follows:
       Flux wt. cone.     -  Z
       Time wt. cone.     r  I —-	

                                           ith
       where  c^  =  concentration  of the i    sample
              q^  =  instantaneous  discharge for  the i*-*1  sample
              t^  =  time  interval  associated with  the j.th  sample
      Both the  flux weighted  and  time weighted  concentrations are calculated as

part  of  the flux  summary program used in   our   data   analyses  (Baker  1983c).

Substances whose  concentrations  increase with increasing flow (e.g., TP, SS,

and N02-3 in event-response  rivers)  have  higher flux   weighted  concentrations

than  time  weighted   concentrations.  Printouts from  the flux summary programs

for each parameter and  station are included in the  appendix to this report.

      The nutrient and sediment concentrations  are much lower in the Black  and

Oswego rivers   than   in  the other   streams.    The Oswego River does have the
                                      16

-------




CM
00
CM
H
0)
•g
4J
O
n
c
o
•H
4J
4J
t;
a
m

4J
0)
4J
JJ
(0


O
4J
id
JJ
c
0)
o
c
o
u
c
A

s

0)
4J
.c
•H
I



4J
•O
§
•a
• I
O^
•H
ii

fc
CM 0)
i5 >
EH
•u m








H V
0 g,



cT4^
w IF



5 x.
EH cr<


ro

CM *»x
g g1



i^
co Cn
CO 6






ll
^^
& &
B





1 •[
ft *s.
co g

Weight-
ing
Method



O
•r)
CO

CM 00
CO CO
5j» VO




f* in
rH P»
(N CO



VO CM
co in
«!• VO


vo ro
rH CM
H 0



ro TJ<
CM CM
CM H




«f H
r*. «^"






vo ro
CM 00
CM H
0 0




CO rH
m m
o o
o o

II
fa EH

•rl
n
•H
«
fl>
£

vo ro
in t-
T in




00 O
*» in
CM CO



O ro
r- o
in in


rH CN
vo ro




<» 00
rH *j*
'S' CO




ro CM
00 CM
rH





CM O
O CO
•» CM
O O




r>> m
co r»
o o
o o

II
rH -H
fa EH

?
^
0)

1

rH VO
^r in
ro in




ro oo
r- T
rH CM



ro ro
in in


O in
00 H




m rr
VO 00
ro ro




O ro
ro oo
rM





oo ro
rH rH
*» CM
0 0




rH VO
vo in
O 0
O 0

II

0)
£
rj
Q)
C

\£ f—|
CM «T
«* VD




r- H
rH VO
CM ro



rH CO
in rr


M- ro
00 H




f» CM
in o
ro ro




vo r-
00 CM
CM





r* o
in CM
T CM
o o




^r CM
vO f
o o
0 0

II
«
1
>i
*
•O
C
fi
CO

CT* O
in m
vo r-




H CM
m m
CM o
rH



in CM
VO vo


00 CO
*cj" ro




 CM
r-- in
H CM




in rH
*d* ^j*
CM H





^> ro
vo ro
*J* ^r
O 0




vo vo
CM in
O rH
0 O

rH -H
fo EH
0)
1
id
81
•ia
3

^3* vO
ro H
rr in




o in
O H
«* in



in H
vo ro
ro co


in in
CM r**
0 0



vo in
CM H
rH rH




r-- in
r^ p*-
CM rH





o m
r- co
CM rH
O O




O 00
CM H
0 0
0 0

1!
rH -rj
0*
•H
(X
Q)
01
CO
0)
1

ro CM
oo in
r* oo





in o
CM ^r
H rH



vo in
vo ro
rH rH


CM CM
r- P-
o o



CM r^
r~ r-
o o



00 T
• *
CM O
rH






CM VO
r»* p^
0 O
O 0




vo r^
CM CM
o o
O 0

98
rH -H
fa EH

>
•H
K

01
I

VO f)
oo CM





00 CM
rH CM




VO «*
vo ro
rr in


O G^
in *r
0 0



in CM
in in
o o



CM CM
rH 0
CM H






P^ P*-
T ro
O 0
O O




n ^j*
O 0
o o
o o

rH -H
fa EH

0)

K
O
10
rH
n

-------
highest chloride concentrations and highest conductivity  of any of the  rivers



included in  the study.  The high chloride content  in  the Oswego river is due,




in part, to the high salt content of Lake Onondaga  near   Syracuse,  New  York.



That lake  receives  wastes  from a chlor-alkali manufacturer (Effler, et.al.,




1983).  In  contrast  the  Black  River  has  by  far  the   lowest   chloride



concentrations and  the  lowest conductivity of any of these streams.   This is



apparently associated with the granitic bedrock within the Black River  Basin.




     The Ohio tributaries to Lake  Erie  have  the  highest  soluble  reactive




phosphorus and  total  phosphorus concentrations.   For the Maumee and  Sandusky




rivers and for Honey Creek, the high phosphorus concentrations  are  primarily




related to  agricultural  land  use.   These three  streams also have very high




flux  weighted   nitrate-nitrite   concentrations.     The   high    phosphorus




concentrations  in  the  Cuyahoga  River  are  largely due  to  point  source




phosphorus loading in the watershed (Baker 1983b).




     The Genesee and Raisin rivers are intermediate in terms of their  nutrient




concentrations.  It is noteworthy that the River Raisin,  whose watershed  has a




higher average gross erosion rate than that of the  Sandusky  (Logan,   et.al.,




1982), has a much lower flux weighted sediment concentration than the  Sandusky



River.  This  illustrates  the  importance  of  sediment   delivery  ratios  in




affecting sediment yields for watersheds.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading




     The annual loading of nutrient and  sediments at   the   transport   stations




are  shown   in  Table  3»   For  the Lake  Erie tributaries the  annual loads  were




calculated  by determining  the   flux  weighted  mean   concentrations   of  each




parameter   for   each  month  at each   station.    The flux    weighted    mean
                                      18

-------




to
a)
>1

to
V
4J
10
*

CM
CO
vT>
H

<0
4-1
to

*w
a
o
-rl
4J
10
m
t!
Q,
p)
CO
C
10
to
•P
4)
•P
(0

m
•8
o
rH

•P
C
1
•O









Station
o
0
r-
o
CM

o
in
TT





O
r-
o

rH




O
CN
rH
CN





O
O
CO

J^»
VO




CO
o
CN






CN
•
cn
^j*







C
•H
to
•H
to
1
O
O
o
CO
VO
rH
O
O
rH
0
5j




o
o
in
^
H
rH



O
O

CO*
CM




O
0
O

O
CO
CM
H


O
CM
CO
CN







VO
r-
in






to
Maumee Rive
o
vO
CM


m
in
CO






vo
en
CN






in
en
in






O
o
CO
*
en
ro


en

en
vo





m
ro
•
en









0)
(D
to
U
1
O
o
in
o
ro

O
CO
tn
c*





CO
in
in
fe
CN




O
O^
en
^
"W





o
o
o

^*
Oi
ro



en
ro
vo






o

o
en






to
5
Sandusky Ri
o
0
CM
i^
CO

I
tn





ro
CO
CM
^
rH




O

in
rH





O
O
0

rH
ro
CN



ro
CM






CM
•
rH
CO






to
5
Cuyahoga Ri
o
o
o
**
ro
rH
O
O
ro
CN
rH




O

rH

CO




O
*d*
CN
^*





O
O
o

rH
ro
cn



CO
8






CM
•
|S»
VO







0)
Gene see Riv
o
o
o
en
ro
CO
O
o
rH
H
H




O
O
ro
*
in




o
o
ro
in





o
o
CO

in
vo




ro
CO








in
P^
rH






^
Oswego Rive
o
H
rH
r^


o
o
CO
H




O
CO
o\
%
rH




O
^
rH
CN





O
O
CO

ro
CO




vO
CO
rH






CO
•
H
H








Black River






































4
to
o

o
•H
to
4J
i
C
•H

t)
a)
-P
to
a
(U
to

-------
concentrations were   then  multiplied  by   the   final  U.S.  Geological  Survey



monthly discharge  values to obtain the monthly loads.  The  monthly loads were



then summed to obtain the annual load.  The computerized work sheets for these




calculations are included in the appendix.   This method of calculating  annual




loads has been described in detail by Baker (1983c).




     For the Lake  Ontario  tributaries,  where  fewer  data  were  available,




nutrient loads  were  calculated by multiplying the flux weighted mean for the




entire sampling period  (Table 2) by the total annual  discharge (Table 1).




     In Table 4 the unit area loads of nutrients and  sediments are  shown  for




each station.   In  all  cases  the unit area loads were calculated  by dividing



 the total  load (Table 3) by the total watershed  area  (Table  1).




      The Maumee River contributed  the largest  loads  of nutrients  and  sediments




 to the lower lakes (Table 3).  The unit area loads of total   phosphorus   were,




 however, higher  in the Cuyahoga and Sandusky  rivers  than in  the  Maumee  (Table




 1).  The influence of agricultural runoff  is most easily seen  in  the  high unit




 area nitrate-nitrite loads of the  Maumee and   Sandusky rivers   and   of   Honey




 Creek.




      The role of tributary loading in the  overall phosphorus  budget   for  Lake




 Erie has  been  described  in  connection  with  the   studies  of bioavailable



 phosphorus loading '(Baker,  1983b).  The total  phosphorus load  at  the   Raisin,




 Maumee, Sandusky,   and  Cuyahoga  stations  accounted   for  27%   of   the  total



 phosphorus loading estimate for the lake from  all sources.  The  procedures for



 extrapolating from loading data at the transport stations to   total   tributary




 and land  runoff  loading  data  are  presented  in the bioavailable phosphorus




 loading report.  The relationship of the 1982  total phosphorus loads to  recent



 loading trends in  the Sandusky Basin is also discussed  in that report.




      The 1982 loading studies  represent   the   first   year  of   a   three  year
                                      20

-------

*
£j
1
01
4J
a


00
en
0)
M



o
4J
a
4J
m
tJ
o
81

Vl
0)
4J
4J
Id
CO
•o
l-l
4)
4J
C
0)
1
4)
n
•a
§
4J
C
a>
-H
4J
C
id
a>
SI
4J
•H
C
p


^
a>

•d
H *v
U &
X



id
CM.C
rt ^^
°.H*
(0 X


id
i ^
JT





co id
cT1 &
Z X



id
<^
co n
Wf4
fc-l
O
4J




id

X




id
& <
Wbw
O*










C

id
r-
VO CM
r~ o
r-l




o> m
vO "»
H CM



VO H
CM O
CO t-»





in
CO CO
r~ r-
i-H



in co
CM r-
o o






r> CM
r> r-
0 iH




CM r-l
co in
o o






C M
•H Q)
a >
T^ ~f4
&
9)
I 8
S s
in t-< vo
rH ^j1 \o O in ^3*
t~ CM f~ t-i CO i-t
rf (N VP




rH ^* ^ CO ^ CM
CM CO CM CM 00 t**
CM CM CO .-1 CO



f* O H H r-t t~
vo CT> o o o o
r^ r** r** in ^ ^d*






^j* ^T TJ* r** f^i \f\
in in oo vo f t
H t-l



co H vo vo in r~
o CM CM ^r o H
H H H rt O O






iH r^ rH co r*- co
CO CM CO ^J1 CO CO
rt H CM t-l O O




CM CO CO VO (M rf
^ r** ^i1 o 10 CM
CM CM ^T iH i-( O
000000




^ M
Q) 4) M
^ ^ 4) M
••^ "(^ **H ^ 4J Vi
4) K A *r4 ^ fl)
4) CM "^| ^
^ >i « K i-j
U X &> 4) K
n o o) o
^i 3 , c § 
-------
program.  At  the  conclusion  of the 198M studies, a more comprehensive final



report on tributary loading will be presented.
                                     22

-------
CONCLUSIONS








     The triburary loading program for lakes Erie  and  Ontario  during the  1982




water year  has  produced  a rather comprehensive  and  consistent data base for




the calculations of tributary loads to these lakes.  The   unit  area  nutrient




and sediment  loadings  from these streams differ  greatly  from one another and




reflect a combination of differences in both land  use  and  land resources.   The




"event response" character of Ohio streams is clearly  evident  in the data.




     At the  time  of  this  writing,  the  IJC  has   not   yet  completed   its




calculations of tributary loading to the lower lakes for  1982.  Information on



the usefulness of this data for  pollutant loading  calculations by the IJC  will




be of  interest.  Dr. John Clark of the IJC will use the  Beale ratio estimator




technique with stratification for calculating loads  for the New York  streams.




Comparisons of  those  loads  with  loads  calculated   using  the overall  flux




weighted mean and total annual discharge will be of  interest.
RECOMMENDATIONS








      Considerable  lead  time  is  necessary  for  the  support  and  development  of




tributary loading   programs.    At   the  time of  data  analyses  and  reporting for




the  1982 programs,  85%  of  the data  for  the   1983 program  has  already  been



collected and   the   proposals   outlining   the  1984   program  have already been




submitted.   In  less than nine months, proposals for  the 1985  program should be




submitted to the EPA.   The budget planning process of the  EPA for the  support



of tributary  loading   programs must,  of necessity,  work   even  further in




advance.
                                      23

-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago,  Illinois  60604

-------
     Several new components have been  added to the  tributary loading  programs



in recent  years.   Attempts  to  measure  bioavailable  phosphorus loading have



been incorporated  into  the  programs.    Loading   studies  of  currently-used



pesticides have been added to the Lake  Erie programs.   I believe that prior to



setting forth  the  1985  water year programs, an evaluation and review of the



Great Lakes tributary loading programs  is  in  order.  Laboratories involved  in



the program  could  share  information   on sampling  and analytical techniques.



Data users could comment on the adequacy  of  existing   data  and  other  data



needs.  Perhaps  the  Great  Lakes  National  Program Office  could convene some



sort of session wherein issues dealing  with tributary loading studies could be



discussed and addressed.
                                      24

-------