COOPERATIVE MINE
 DRAINAGE  SURVEY
 Kiskiminetas River
        Basin
 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION
         AGENCY
      Wheeling Field Office
     Wheeling, West Virginia

-------
  COOPERATIVE MINE DRAINAGE SURVEY
      KISKEMINETAS RIVER BASIN
              APRIL  1972
                                 U.S. EPA Region III
                                 Regional Center for Environmental
                                  Information
                                 1650 Arch Street (3PM52)
                                 Philadelphia, PA 19103
             Prepared By:
U. S.  Environmental Protection Agency
         Wheeling Field Office
        Wheeling, West Virginia
                                          Regional Center for Hmironmental Information
                                                US EPA Region III
                                                  16SO Arch St
                                                Philadelphia. PA 19101

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES                                                 IV

LIST OF FIGURES                                               VII

Summary                                                         1

Recommendations                                                 7

Background                                                     10

Introduction                                                   16

Purpose and Scope                                              21

Geology and Groundwater                                        23

Coal Mining                                                    27


KISKIMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES -          31
                MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY

Summary and Conclusions                                        32

Description of Area                                            33

Stream Water Quality                                           33

Sources of Mine Drainage                                       38

Pollution Abatement                                            51

Principal Sources                                              58


IOYALHANNA CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY                       67

Summary and Conclusions                                        68

Description of Area                                            70

Stream Water Quality                                           70

Sources of Mine Drainage                                       76

Pollution Abatement                                            87

Principal Sources                                              95

-------
               TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)






                                                             Page



CONEMAUGH RIVER MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY                       105



Summary and Conclusions                                       10°"



Description of Area                                           107



Stream Water Quality                                          107



Sources of Mine Drainage                                      112



Pollution Abatement                                           128




Principal Sources                                             129






BIACKLICK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY                       135



Summary and Conclusions                                       136



Description of Area                                           137



Stream Water Quality                                          138



Sources of Mine Drainage                                      1^2



Active Mines                                                  157



Pollution Abatement
Principal Sources                                             167






TWO LICK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY                        175



Summary and Conclusions                                       176



Description of Area                                           177



Stream Water Quality                                          178



Sources of Mine Drainage                                      182



Pollution Abatement                                           205



Principal Sources                                  .           211
                               ii

-------
                 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

                                                             Page

LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY               219

Summary and Conclusions                                      220

Description of Area                                          221

Stream Water Quality                                         222

Sources of Mine Drainage                                     222

Pollution Abatement

Principal Sources


STONY CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY                          251

Summary and Conclusions                                      252

Description of Area                                          253

Stream Water Quality                                         253

Sources of Mine Drainage                                     258

Active Mines                                                 29U

Pollution Abatement                                          302

Principal Sources                                            307


REFERENCES                                                   312
APPENDICES                                                   315
Appendix A - Stream Water Quality, Survey Findings, 1966     A-l

Appendix B - Mine Drainage Data, Kiskiminetas River          B

Appendix C - Mine Drainage Data, Loyalhanna Creek            c

Appendix D - Mine Drainage Data, Conemaugh River             D

Appendix E - Mine Drainage Data, Blacklick Creek             E

Appendix F - Mine Drainage Data, Two Lick Creek              F

Appendix G - Mine Drainage Data, Little Conemaugh River      G

Appendix H - Mine Drainage Data, Stony Creek                 H
                             iii

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                            Page

  1     Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,                 5
        Kiskiminetas River basin

  2     Mine drainage loadings by source type,                      6
        Kiskiminetas River basin

  3     Stream water quality sampling stations, Kiskiminetas       35
        River main stem and minor tributaries

  U     Stream water quality data, Kiskiminetas River,             3&
        main stem and minor tributaries

  5     Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,                55
        Kiskiminetas River, main stem and minor tributaries

  6     Mine drainage loadings by source type, Kiskiminetas        56
        River, main stem and minor tributaries

  7     Principal mine drainage sources, Kiskiminetas River,       60
        main stem and minor tributaries

  8     Stream water quality sampling stations, Loyalhanna         72
        Creek

  9     Stream water quality data, Loyalhanna Creek                fk

 10     Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,                91
        Loyalhanna Creek

 11     Mine drainage loadings by source type, Loyalhanna          92
        Creek

 12     Principal mine drainage sources, Loyalhanna Creek          96

 13     Stream water quality sampling stations, Conemaugh          109
        River, main stem and minor tributaries

 lU     Stream water quality data, Conemaugh River, main           110
        stem and minor tributaries

 15     Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,                123
        Conemaugh River, main stem and minor tributaries
                              iv

-------
               LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table                                                          fege

 16   Mine drainage loadings by source type, Conemugh          127
      River, main stem and minor tributaries

 17   Principal mine drainage sources, Conemaugh River,         130
      main stem and minor tributaries

 18   Stream water quality sampling stations, Blacklick         139
      Creek

 19   Stream water quality data, Blacklick Creek                lUo

 20   Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,               159
      Blacklick Creek

 21   Mine drainage loadings by source type, Blacklick          163
      Creek

 22   Principal mine drainage sources, Blacklick Creek          166

 23   Stream water quality sampling stations, Two Lick          179
      Citeek

 2k   Stream water quality data, Two Lick Creek                 180

 25   Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,               206
      Two Lick Creek

 26   Mine drainage loadings by source type,  Two Lick          208
      Creek

 27   Principal mine drainage sources, Two Lick Creek           210

 28   Stream water quality sampling stations, Little            223
      Conemaugh River

 29   Stream water quality data, Little Conemaugh River         221*

 30   Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,               2U2
      Little Conemaugh River

 31   Mine drainage loadings by source type, Little             2UU
      Conemaugh River

 32   Principal mine drainage sources, Little                   2U6
      Conemaugh River

-------
                    LIST OF TABLES (Continued)



Table                                                               Page



 33    Stream water quality sampling stations,  Stony Creek           255



 3^    Stream water quality data, Stony Creek                        256



 35    Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream,  Stony Creek       297



 36    Mine drainage loadings by source type, Stony Creek            301



 37    Principal mine drainage sources, Stony Creek
                                  vi

-------
                          LIST OF FIGURES

                                                                   Page
 1   Water quality sampling stations, Kiskindnetas River             11
     basin, 1966

 2   Availability of ground water, Kiskindnetas River basin          26

 3   Stream water quality sampling locations, Kiskindnetas           37
     River, main stem and minor tributaries

 U   Mine location map, Kiskindnetas River, main stem and            53
     minor tributaries

 5   Principal source location map, Kiskindnetas River,              6l
     main stem and minor tributaries

 6   Stream water quality sampling locations, Loyalhanna Creek       75

 7   Mine location map, Loyalhanna Creek                             89

 8   Principal source location map, Loyalhanna Creek                 97

 9   Stream water quality sampling locations, Conemaugh             HI
     River, main stem ar. i minor tributaries

10   Mine location map, Conemaugh River, main stem and              125
     minor tributaries

11   Principal source location map, Conemaugh River, main
     stem and minor tributaries

12   Stream water quality sampling locations, Blacklick Creek

13   Mine location map, Blacklick Creek                             l6l

I1*   Principal source location map, Blacklick Creek                 169

15   Stream water quality sampling locations, Two Lick Creek        l8l

16   Mine location map, Two Lick Creek                              203

17   Principal source location map, Two Lick Creek                  213

18   Stream water quality sampling locations, Little                225
     Conemaugh River

19   Mine location map, Little Conemaugh River                      239

20   Principal source location map, Little Conemaugh River
                                vii

-------
                    LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)


Figure                                                        Rtge

  21    Stream water quality sampling locations,              257
        Stony Creek

  22    Mine location map, Stony Creek                        299

  23    Principal source location map, Stony Creek            305
                                viii

-------
                           SUMMARY






     Each of the sub-basin watersheds of the Kiskiminetas River



basin experience the widespread problem of coal mine drainage



pollution.  Various measures are needed to reverse the water



quality degradation that has occurred in the seven watershed



areas.  A brief summary of each watershed follows:






Kiskiminetas River, main stem and minor tributaries




     A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,^75



acres of surface mined land were investigated in this area.  The



total effluent from the discharging sources was nearly 6.U million



gallons per day (mgd).  The total acid load discharged to the



Kiskiminetas River and its minor tributaries below the community



of Saltsburg was 57,880 Ib/day.  Seventeen principal mine drainage



sources were located in the study area.  These sources discharged



a total net acid load of U6,6l3 Ib/day, about 8l percent of the



acid load discharged by all sources in the watershed.






Loyalhanna Creek



     The water quality degradation resulting from coal mine drain-



age in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed is most apparent below the



community of Latrobe.  A total of 52 discharging sources and ap-



proximately 900 acres of surface mined land were investigated



during the study period.  The total net acid load contributed by



the 52 sources was 65,U07 Ib/day.  Approximately 96 percent of



this acid load (65,^07 Ib/day) was contributed by 15 principal

-------
sources (Mine No.'s 5177, 5356, and 536*0 contributed a combined



acid load of nearly 25 tons per day.






Conemaugh River




     A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately 1,700



acres of surface mined land were investigated during the study.



The total net acid load discharged to receiving streams was



35,10U Ib/day.  Abandoned drift mines and coal refuse piles were



the major sources of mine drainage discharge.  A total of six prin-



cipal source sites were located in the watershed.  These sources




contributed a total net acid load of 30,U95 Ib/day, or about 86



percent of the total watershed acid load.






Blacklick Creek




     Several hundred mining sites and approximately 1,675 acres  of



surface mined land were investigated in the Blacklick Creek water-




shed.  A total of l6l sites discharging at the time of survey con-



tributed an acid load of 273,073 Ib/day.  During the study, fourteen



discharges emanating from active mines were inventoried in the water-



shed.  The acid load from these sources represented about one-half of



the total watershed load.  However, the pollutional loading from



active mines has since been significantly reduced by the installation



of treatment facilities.  Eighteen principal sources of abandoned




mine drainage were located during the study.  These sources discharged



a combined acid load of more than 125,000 Ib/day to receiving streams



in the Blacklick Creek watershed.

-------
Two Lick Creek




     Abandoned drift mines, shaft mines, and mine refuse piles



were the major sources of mine drainage pollution in the Two Lick



Creek watershed.  During the study, a total of 17^ discharging



mine sites contributed an acid load of 36,6^5 lb/day to receiving



streams in the study area.  Twelve principal sources of mine drain-



age were identified during the survey.  These twelve sites contri-



buted an acid load of 29,11^ lb/day, about 80 percent of the total



acid load discharged by all 17^ sources.






Little Conemaugh River




     A total of 99 discharging sources and approximately 1,1*00



acres of surface mined land were investigated in the study area.



Discharges from these sources totalled more than 29 million gal-



lons per day (mgd).  Abandoned drift mines and shaft mines  were



the major source of mine drainage discharge in the Little Conemaugh



River basin.  Seven principal drainage sources contributed about



80 percent of the total basin-wide acid load (153,570 lb/day).





Stony Creek




     Approximately 5*700 acres of surface mined land and 199 dis-



charging sources were investigated in the Stony Creek watershed.



Discharges from the coal mine sources totalled 23.7 million gallons



per day.  The total net acid load was 97,310 lb/day.  Abandoned



drift mines were the major contributor of mine drainage pollution.



Shaft mines and mine refuse piles were also significant contribu-




tors of acid discharge.  Thirteen principal mine drainage sources

-------
were identified in the Stony Creek watershed.  These sources dis-



charged a total net acid load of 6l,?6l Ib/day, about 63 percent



of the total acid load discharged by all 199 sources in the water-



shed.





     A summary by watershed study area for the Kiskitninetas River



basin is presented in Table 1.  A summary by source type for all



mine discharges in the basin is presented in Table 2.  Load values



shown in these tables reflect the conditions measured during the



1968 study and are exclusive of any mine drainage treatment faci-



lities installed since the date of inventory.

-------
£>
 cd
H



















e
cd
CU
JJ
CO
60
C
•H
>
•H
CD
O
0) C
(J H
CO
rS Cd
_o »JO
CO t-l
60 CU
c >
1-1 1-1
^3 PM
ed
o co
jj
0) CD
60 C
cd -H
C E
•H f-l
Cfl rVS
t-1 CO
T3 -H
t^
a)
c
g
































§
3
c
•H
E
3
rH
CU
CO
cu
C
^~,
>
cd
•o

.0.
I— 1

>
cd
*^
60^
C
C
O
J-i
(-1

"«
jj
o
H



CU
JJ
cd
IJH

3
CO




CO
CO
rH CU
ftf C
JJ T3
O JH
H cd



JJ

55 JJ
•H
cd in
JJ O
O <;
H

cu
60
rH tl

4J ffJ
O 0
H en
•H
Q

MH
O

•
O
"Z
















I-*

^\
>
cd

^Q
r—j
X-X



^
S,
flj
*O
•v^
JO
t-H
v^




'P
cd

*x^
^Q
r-l
^



XN
^
cd
-o
^
rH
>«•>




s~\
E
a
w



CO
0)
u
l-i
3
O
CO












cd
CU
^J
T
in





ON
CO
N^f
n
xj-





ON
00



cu l-i
> 0
•H C
QJ -H
E
CO
cd c£J co
JJ CU
cu e 1-1
C CU rJ
•lH JJ Cd
E co jj
•H 3
^ C -Q
CO -H nH
•H g J-I


^4.
t-H
in
M
t-H


VO
f>^
<^
rH



O

0
VO
CM





CO

ON
M
O
^
rH




CO
in
oo

CNI
o
•-1




p^
o

m
VO





m

rH
•t
t— 1
rH




CM
in




v^
cu

vO
vO
CO





CM
0
rH
•s
r^*





*^
i^.
rH




^
H
.CJ

t^
O
•H
hJ

O

H

CO
co
p*.
M
sj-


m
^o
vO
rH



vO
o
CO
m
m





t-H
*
•s
CO
oo
rH




O
p^.
m
CO
m
rH




CO
co

A
o
CM




ON
ON


CU
2
r*t
60
ctf
CU
c
o
CJ

cu
rH
JJ
JJ
•H
HH

vO
CO
oo
M
CM


CM
vO
ON




rH
vO
^
oo
rH





t-H
J>x
ON
n
oo
oo
rH




rH
t-H
CM
•s
t-H
oo





O
rH
CO
o.
ON





rH
vO
o-
•V
vO
rH




ON
ON
rH






^
CU
cu
)H
CJ

^
C
O
JJ
CO

^^
00
t-H
r.
ON
CM

VO

^
VO



CO

Is-
CM
00
rH




s^J-
CM
CO
M
O
|*s»
en
»t
r-f


VO
O
^J-
•s
VO
m
m




ON
oo
ON
oo
rH
f-^




rH
^4.
OO
A
fx.
00




o
rH
OO

CO
H
O
H













-------






















o
0.
4J

, 0)
Xi >
CM 09 05
DO
(U C to
r-l ft Cd
Xt t3 JJ
rt cd o)
HOC
1-1 "B
CD -H
00 ^
cd co
5 3
cd

•O

0)
C

if





















1?
C rt
•H TJ
3 J3
r-4 r-l
< ^
CO "£
01 rt
C -o
rt ^
00 Xi
C rH
C
o
H >
rt
r-l t)
rt *v
•U Xl
O r-l
H ^
27
rt (t
14-1 TJ
1"^ ^""s
3 XI
CO r-l
N^




CO 0
CO >
1-4 o> rt
cd C -O
4J t3 ^v
0 h Xi
£-4 tfl i—
33 ^^


1 i
0) X/->
z 4J >•
•H Cd
r-4 -O TJ
rt 1-1 ^-v
il ^\ f
O ^ti ^"^
H ^

CO
01
00
it
r-l rt *-\
rt f, 6
4J y 5,
o co e
Hg
0
0 t
14
• r
O O
z co




0)
a
iw
i^
H
01
c.
(
CO
^ O CM
^ r-l f**
1-1 •» 00
CO


\Q ^5 ^^
O  -o
u c u -H a e
vu « u-i t) T-I rfl
•rt X> "H y ^4 XI
JU rt JM cd 4J rt
Q ^x Q v^ CO >- '
ON m
CM
~*^
r-l


CO •*
CO CO
CM





O vo
CO ON
r-4
M
in


CM 00
r^ *^
s* m
CM CM
^






CM VO
r-l •*
in vo
i-i •*
r-4




ON CM
O r-
ON
CM






•* vD
O fO
co r^
«t
CO


00 O
CM
1— 1


CO
0)
a
r>

o) C
01 O
C iH
Jrj <"N 4J
^ Cj
a -H -H
•H 4J Xt
Jj o €
JJ (0 O
CO N*^ O

































































X"\
•a
01
c
o
*o '
c
•2

N"^
CO
oo
00
^


CM

CO
A
CM



00
ON
i-l
M
vO
f^


in
0
i^T
m






o

rH
o"
VO
CM



(^
CO
o"
ON
r-4





CO
00
vO
ON
CM

CO
CO







09 ^N
0) TJ
C 0)
jg g
T3
U C
u-i cd
rt Xi
f. rt
OT ^^
00
0
00
vO


CO

ON





^
r-l
r-l
M
oo
CO

O
ao
ON
m"
o
CO





1— 4
vO
^
0
OQ




r^
^
o"
CO
r-4





vO
ON
vO
vo"
r-4

ON








CO
0)
C
27
>
4J -H
14-1 4J
rt o
X! rt
CO -+S
CO
O
vO
VO


m
oo
CO





m
00
ON

CM
I-l

^
vO
CO
^jT
ON






00
r-4
i-l
00
r-l




^J.
fv
ON"
ON






00
O
O
CM


o
oo






CO
01
r-4
•H

0)
m
3
<4-4
QI
CC

































































^^
TJ
0)
§
TJ
C
cd
X)

^•^
o r- co o
CM




r-l CM O O







m r^ -^ r>.
^f





in vo r^ CM
m ON CM m
CM m «*








ON o r* O
r-l 00 ON m
CM






>* 00 CM r-l
00 1^ 00 r-4







m vo CM CM
CM O in CM
1-4



r-l •* CM CM




JJ
C
rt
r-i
OH CO
a
c o
0 JJ
•1-4 u en ca
JJ /•> JJ r-4 r-l
Cd 01 3 r-l r-l
(j > O 0) 01
rt «r< » S
O. 4J r-t
01 O « rH W
b rt o T-I to
P4 "^ CJ O O
o





rH







rH






rH
vO









vO
rH







vO
CM







O
rH




rH












rH
i
3
(H
^.
00
1-4
ON"
CM

vO
00
VO
M
VO



CO

f**
n
CM
00
rH
^
CM
cn
o"
r-»
CO
A
rH



vO
ON
*
00
f^
oo

o
i— i
oo



(J
^
Q
E_i








-------
                       RECOMMENDATIONS






     The inventoried watersheds of the Kiskiminetas River basin




are all intrastate water bodies; consequently, the primary respon-



sibility for water pollution control in these areas rests with



Pennsylvania.  It is, therefore, recommended that the Commonwealth



proceed to develop a detailed plan to eliminate or significantly




reduce mine drainage pollution in the Kiskiminetas River basin.



     It is realized that there are a number of difficult, lengthy,




and expensive tasks involved in any program leading to abatement



of pollutant discharges from inactive underground mining sites.  A



very major problem in this realm is the less than complete techni-



cal knowledge available of physical abatement measures.   The follow-



ing recommendations are made for the establishment of an abandoned



mine drainage abatement program in the seven inventoried watersheds



of the Kiskiminetas River basin.  The recommendations are based on



the water quality measurements performed by the Environmental Pro-



tection Agency during 1966 and the cooperative mine drainage source



investigation conducted in 1968 by the EJft and the Pennsylvania De-



partment of Environmental Resources (DER).



1.  Establishment of a mine drainage source abatement priority



    listing.  Such priorities could be assigned utilizing the



    data outlined in this document.  The priorities can be



    based upon the impact and relative contribution of each



    source to the total watershed problem.  For example, a



    mine discharging high acidity and/or mineral loadings



    would be of a higher priority than a discharge of lesser

-------
    loading located downstream of the discharge of greater pollu-



    tant loading.   The priority of some sources may change as  a



    result of item 3 below.   A preliminary priority listing of



    principal mine drainage  sources is contained under the Pollu-



    tion Abatement Section of each individual watershed report.





2,  Feasibility studies.  Probably undertaken on a  contractual



    basis, these preliminary studies would have the objectives of



    proposing abatement methods for the individual prioritized



    sources and estimating the cost of the methods.





3.  Characterization of water quality with time.  Coincident with



    the preliminary feasibility studies, a basin wide water quality



    sampling network should  be established for repetitive water



    quality measurements. The network should include all important



    tributary streams receiving mine drainage and a number of  loca-



    tions on the principal streams.  The larger mine drainage



    sources should also be included.  Flow measurement and chemical



    analyses could then be performed at these locations at regular



    intervals, preferably weekly or bi-weekly, for a minimum of  a



    12-month water year.



    This phase of the total study will provide data for a pollution



    source priority listing based on the annual pollution contribu-



    tion of each source.  Also, sufficient stream water quality



    data will be developed to permit reasonably accurate stream



    quality improvement predictions from contemplated corrective



    programs.
                             8

-------
h.  Detailed engineering plans.  Based on items 2 and 3, detailed




    engineering plans and final cost estimates could then be de-



    veloped for the most applicable proposal from item 2; that is,



    most applicable from the standpoint of the greater water



    quality improvement to be obtained for a dollar spent.






5.  Construction.  Installation of appropriate physical measures




    could then be carried out.  Monitoring of discharge changes




    with time at the altered sites and in the receiving streams



    must be an integral part of the abatement program.  Routine



    maintenance at the controlled sources is also essential.




    Easements to or out-right purchase of land may be necessary




    for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to obtain control over



    pollutant sources on private property.  Institutional changes



    also may need to be sought to enable the state government to



    achieve site control by the expenditure of public monies on



    private property.  The acquisition of mineral rights in the



    area of source abatement projects may be necessary to prevent



    future mining activity from destroying the physical controls.





    It is further recommended that, in all phases of the described



abatement program, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania seek technical



and financial assistance from all appropriate agencies of the




Federal government.



    All conclusions, recommendations, and estimates contained in



this document are subject to refinement as the programs of the EPA



and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania progress.

-------
                         BACKGROUND






     Streams draining the coal fields of the Kiskiminetas River



have probably been acidic in nature from the time of the opening




of the first mines and they remain so at the present time.  A re-



port from the 1930's refers to the acid stream conditions in both



the Kiskiminetas River as well as in major tributaries to the



River (l).  The initial documentation of the mine drainage prob-




lem in this basin is not known; however, it has existed for per-



haps nearly a century,



     In the past kO years, a number of published and unpublished




reports have described the acid stream conditions in the Kiski-



minetas River.  However, none of these reports were detailed or



comprehensive studies of the problem.



     During 1966, the Wheeling Field Office of the Environmental



Protection Agency in Wheeling, West Virginia conducted a stream



water quality survey of the upper Ohio River as part of the overall



Appalachian Water Resources Survey (2).  In the Kiskiminetas River



basin, a network of 26 stream sampling stations was established for



repetitive sampling and flow measurement during the 1966 field season.



The survey produced quantitative data on mine drainage problem areas




in the basin.  The survey findings are discussed in the following



section and presented in Appendix A.  The locations of the 1966



water quality sampling points are shown on Figure 1.
                            10

-------

-------
         STREAM WATER QUALITY - SURVEY FINDINGS, 1966






     The Kiskiminetas River enters the Allegheny River 30 miles




above Pittsburgh.  During the survey, the Kiskiminetas River dis-




charged a massive average net acid load of ^9^- tons per day as




measured at Vandergrift (Sta. 56?).  The pH of the river ranged




from 3.0 to 3.6 and the alkalinity was depleted throughout the




survey.  Long term water quality records show that the river




discharges an average of 329 tons per day of acidity to the




Allegheny River (3).




     Within the Kiskiminetas •watershed, there are about ^85 miles




of streams polluted by mine drainage.  Many streams are acid even




in the upper headwater areas of Somerset and Cambria Counties.




The Little Conemaugh River above Johnstown (Sta. 581) carried a




net acid load of 25 tons per day.




     Stony Creek, which enters the Conemaugh River at Johnstown,




drains U66 square miles and contains more than 100 miles of acid



streams.  The principal tributaries of Stony Creek are polluted




by mine drainage.  Shade Creek carried a net acid load of 13 tons




per day (Sta k^b).  Additional acid loads discharged to the Conemaugh




River between Johnstown and Seward, Pennsylvania raised the average




net acid load in the river to 86 tons per day (Sta. 579)•
                             12

-------
     Blacklick Creek and many of its tributaries are acid over



their entire length.  The Blacklick watershed contains over 100



miles of mine drainage polluted streams.  The pH at the mouth of




Blacklick Creek ranged from 2.5 to 2.9 and the total acidity con-



centration from ^52 to 897 mg/1 (Sta. 573).  The net acid load of



208 tons/day discharged from Blacklick Creek is h2 percent of the



net acid load discharged by the Kiskiminetas River.



     A net acid load of 88 tons per day was measured on the North



Branch Blacklick Creek at White Mill Crossing in Cambria County



(Sta. 577).  Although the watershed above this point represents



only Ik percent of the Blacklick Creek watershed, Ul percent of



the total net acid load of Blacklick Creek was measured here.



The load at this station amounts to 18 percent of that measured



in .the Kiskiminetas at Vandergrift.  Two Lick Creek discharged a




net acid load of 38 tons per day to Blacklick Creek (Sta. 571*).



     The Conemaugh River below Blairsville (Sta. 575) carried a



net acid load of 397 tons per day, contained no alkalinity, and



exhibited a pH range of 2.9 to 3.3.  Continuing downstream, the



Kiskiminetas River is formed where the Conemaugh River and Loyal-



hanna Creek converge just above the Armstrong-Indiana County Line.



Loyalhanna Creek is an acid stream over much of its length and con-



tributed a net acid load of 57 tons per day.  The pH ranged from



3.3 to U.7 and the alkalinity was completely depleted (Sta. 570).



     From the origin of the Kiskiminetas River at Saltsburg to its



mouth, there are several small acid contributing tributaries.  The



largest of these is Blacklegs Creek which contained a net acid load
                            •13

-------
at its mouth of five tons per day  (Sta. 569).



     During the 1966 water quality survey, the  Kiskiminetas River



at Vandergrift (Sta. 567) contained an average  manganese concentra-



tion of 23.2 mg/1.  High average manganese concentrations were



found at Station 579 (29.8 mg/l) and Station  567 (23.2 mg/1) in



the Conemaugh and Kiskiminetas River below Johnstown.   Manganese



concentrations in tributaries to the Conemaugh-Kiskiminetas main-



stem averaged about one-tenth of the mainstem concentrations.  The




higher manganese levels in the mainstem below Johnstown are probably



due to discharges from the steel industry.



     The Conemaugh-Kiskiminetas River is an acid stream over its



entire length and the river system is grossly polluted by coal



mine drainage.  Acid, sterile streams in this watershed are the



rule and not the exception.



     Although the Allegheny River possessed adequate dilution and



neutralizing capability to assimilate mine drainage water received



above the mouth of the Kiskiminetas River, the water quality is



significantly degraded below this point.  The Allegheny River at



Natrona, Pennsylvania carried an average net acid load of 2^5 tons



per day and had a pH range of k.O to 6.8.  The total acidity con-



centration exceeded the alkalinity concentration during two thirds



of the survey period.  However, the acidity concentration was gen-




erally below 30 rag/1.



     A one-year study during 1965-1966 conducted by the University




of Pittsburgh for the Wheeling Field Office of The Environmental
                             1U

-------
Protection Agency measured an average net acid load of 3&t tons per



day discharged from the Kiskiminetas River and a net alkalinity load



of U01 tons per day from the Allegheny River at Pittsburgh (h).



     Water quality records show that acid conditions in the lower



Allegheny River are particularly acute during periods of low flow



when the percentage contribution of flow to the mainstem by the



Kiskirainetas is greater than normal.  When roughly 30 percent of



the flow in the Allegheny is from the Kiskiminetas River, fish kills



are expected.  One million fish were killed in the Allegheny River



below the Kiskirainetas due to acid conditions during the period



August 19-23, 1966.
                            15

-------
                        INTRODUCTION


     In the spring of 196?» several discussions were held between

personnel of the Wheeling Field Office, Environmental Protection

Agency, Wheeling, West Virginia, and personnel of the Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental Resources (DER).   These discussions

developed into a cooperative State-Federal project to locate and

quantify all significant sources of coal mine drainage in the

principal problem areas of the Allegheny River basin.  The first

cooperative effort was developed in the Clarion River basin.  The

field work portion of this initial study was completed in the fall

of 1967.  In the spring of 1968, it was decided to continue the

cooperative field effort in the Kiskiminetas River basin.  Based

on the available water quality data and the widespread severity of

the mine drainage problem, it was decided to extend the field survey

over the entire 1,892 square mile drainage area of the Kiskiminetas

River.

     For the purpose of aiding the field survey crews as well as

aiding in the initial field reports, the Kiskiminetas River basin

was delineated into seven separate sub-basin drainage areas.  The

seven sub-basin areas are shown on Figure 1.   Pertinent data re-

garding these areas is shown below:

                 MINE DRAINAGE SURVEY AREAS

                  KISKIMINETAS RIVER BASIN

Survey Area                                  Drainage Area (sq. miles)

Kiskiminetas River - mainstem and tributaries           216
Loyalhanna Creek                                   •     300
                            16

-------
                                                       Drainage Area
Survey Area                                             (sq.  miles)

Conemaugh River - mainstem and minor tributaries            310
Blacklick Creek                                             222
Two Lick Creek                                              190
Little Conemaugh River                                      188
Stony Creek
                                         TOTAL            1,892

     Four two-man crews performed the field work during the study.

Due to other work commitments, there were a few periods when the

total field force was not in operation.  However, all four field

crews were in operation during most of the study period.  The study

began during the second week of April, 1968 and was completed during

October 1968.

     Field crew personnel were supplied on an equal basis by the

EPA and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, i. e. four men each.  The

EPA personnel were all from the Wheeling Field Office, Wheeling,

West Virginia.  The Pennsylvania personnel were all from the Depart-

ment of Environmental Resources Offices at Pittsburgh, Meadville,

Lewistown, Williamsport, Kingston, and West Reading.  Mine discharges

were numbered consecutively by watershed as encountered.  Field per-

sonnel prepared an inventory sheet for each sample taken describing

the conditions found.  Color photographs were taken to augment the

descriptions of certain mine discharges.

     Samples were taken for laboratory analysis of each mine dis-

charge and selected surface streams.  Conductivity, pH determinations

and a flow measurement were made at the time of each sample collec-

tion.   The samples were analyzed by laboratory facilities in
                             •17

-------
the Wheeling Field Office for the additional parameters of total



acidity, alkalinity, hardness, sulfate, total iron, manganese and




aluminum.  Approximately 950 samples were analyzed during the six-



month intensive sampling period.



     During the past several years, Pennsylvania has shown an in-



creasing awareness of stream pollution resulting from the discharge



of both active and abandoned coal mines.  In 1965* Pennsylvania



amended the existing Clean Streams Law for pollution control from



active mines.  In 196?, a Land and Water Conservation and Reclama-



tion Bond Issue of 500 million dollars was approved.  This bond



issue allocated 150 million dollars for the abatement of mine



drainage pollution from abandoned mines (5).  The bond issue money



is budgeted over a ten year period under the direction of the De-



partment of Environmental Resources.  In conjunction with the Clean



Streams Law, the Commonwealth is in the position to direct pollution



abatement activities toward the abandoned mine problem and also in



the position to enforce effluent standards on the discharges emanat-



ing from active mines.



     Present Commonwealth of Pennsylvania mine drainage pollution



control regulatory authority is adequate to prevent additional



stream quality degradation due to iron and acidity from active or



future mining activities.  Stream pollution resulting from operating




coal mines in the Kiskiminetas River basin were quite significant



during the period of survey.  However, the amount of mine drainage



pollution emanating from active operations has been significantly
                            18

-------
reduced by the installation of treatment facilities.  It is the



residual problem of drainage from abandoned mines that will re-



quire virtually all of the emphasis of any program of drainage



abatement in the Kiskiminetas River basin.



     The Commonwealth has developed their abandoned mine drainage




program in four phases (6).  The initial field inventory and docu-



mentation of existing pollution sources, as presented in this re-



port, completes the Phase I (Pollution Source Inventory) portion



of this program.  Phase II (Engineering Studies and Plans) essen-



tially incorporates the recommendations outlined in items 2, 3> and



k as listed in an earlier section of this document.  Phase III of



this program includes construction while Phase TV is concerned with



operation and maintenance of the physical structure.



     As mentioned above,  the mine drainage source inventory conduc-



ted during the cooperative study completes the Phase I portion of



the abatement schedule outlined above.  Since completion of the



field inventory, the Commonwealth has initiated preliminary engi-



neering studies (Phase n) and/or on a limited basis, construction



(Phase III) in several of the inventoried Kiskiminetas River water-



sheds.  These areas include Two Lick Creek, Loyalhanna Creek, Stony



Creek, and Blacklegs Creek.





     In preparation of the Kiskiminetas River mine drainage report,



an attempt was made to update existing information on active mines



in the basin.  Contact was made with the appropriate Regional Office



of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources relative
                            19

-------
to the active underground mine* in their respective regions.   This



information, as supplied by these offices at the time of request,



has been included in the sub-basin reports.   No attempt was made



to include active nines which have been developed since 1968.   As



a result of the nature of such mining, no attempt was made to up-



date information concerning surface mines which were active at the



time of survey.
                            20

-------
                      rURPOSE AND SCOPE






     The purpose of this report is to provide basic data concerning



sources of coal mine drainage in critical problem areas of the Kis-



kiminetas River basin.  Information regarding the location, physical



characteristics, and quantity and quality of point sources is req-



uisite to the development of a program to reduce or eliminate the



deleterious water quality affects of mine drainage.



     The objectives of this report are to:



     1.  Describe the significance and impact of water quality



         impairment by coal mine drainage in the Kiskiminetas




         River basin.



     2.  Identify and characterize the tributary watersheds



         contributing significant amounts of acidity and re-



         lated constituents to the Kiskiminetas River,



     3.  Relate mine drainage contributions of sub-watersheds



         to the mainstem of the receiving stream.



     h.  Inventory the sources of coal mine drainage, by



         watershed, in terms of salient characteristics



         and quantity and quality of discharge.



     5.  Isolate and identify the principal pollution sources



         in each watershed unit studied.



     6.  Outline essential steps in a mine drainage abatement



         program.



     Descriptions of seven inventoried watersheds of the Kiskimine-



tas River basin are contained in the following sections of this
                            21

-------
document.  There are seven separate sections,  one pertaining to



each watershed.  Each section contains its own summary and con-




clusions, maps, water quality data, and related mine drainage




information.  Analyses for the individual discharging mine sites




are shown in the appendices.  A separate appendix is included



for each of the individual watershed study areas.



     Abating pollution from inactive mines is a task the cost



and success of which are difficult to predict at this time with



reasonable accuracy.  The difficulty stems from the fact that



there is little experience with watershed-scale abatement projects



upon which to base estimates.



     It is the general conclusion of this report that the develop-



ment of meaningful cost estimates for the abatement of mine drainage



pollution in the Kiskiminetas River basin is sufficiently complex to



warrant a separate engineering-economic study.  No attempt has been



made to suggest order-of-magnitude cost estimates for the study area.



     A preliminary and relatively short-term survey, such as reported



herein, is qualitative but results in limited quantitative conclusions.



The chemical loadings of mine drainage parameters measured in the mine



discharges and the pollutional effects of these loadings measured in



the receiving streams are representative of the time of survey.  These



loading figures do not reflect permanent or established conditions and



will exhibit widely varying rates at different periods of hydrologic



conditions.  The acquired data is significant in that it provides a



preliminary basis for further studies.  The recommendations leading



to an action program of mine drainage pollution abatement stated in




this document are based upon this data.
                            22

-------
                  GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER






     The eastern part of the Kiskiminetas River basin has a dis-




tinctive series of northeast-trending anticlinal ridges, which



are the chief physiographic features.  Toward the center or axis



of these major structures, the rocks are progressively older.



The axial centers are principally rocks of the Pocono Formation




which are flanked on both the east and west by succeedingly




younger rocks of the Mauch Chunk, Pottsvilie, Allegheny, and



Conemaugh Formations.  Along the axial centers of major syncli-



nal structures in the western part of the basin, the Monongahela



Formation forms the land surface.



     Principal rock types of these water-bearing rock units are



sandstone conglomerate, shale, minor beds of limestone, and a few



bituminous coal beds of commercial importance.  In general, the



thick conglomeratic sandstones are the best sources of ground water.



The history of development of ground water supplies shows that val-



leys are hydrologically more favorable than hilltops for satisfactory



wells.



     Adequate supplies of ground water are available in the basin to



meet most of the needs for the present and the forseeable future.



Development of ground water has not been intense and many areas are



practically untapped.  The quantity of ground water withdrawn is



actually only a fraction of the total available supply.  Principal



developments for communities and industries have been in the extensive
                           .23

-------
permeable sandstone aquifers that crop out or that lie within 300




to hOO feet of the land surface.  The most favorable areas for



development of relatively large ground water supplies are under-



lain by massive coarse-grained conglomeratic sandstones of the



Allegheny, Pottsville, and Pocono Formations.  These rocks, which



underlie somewhat less than half the basin area, yield large



quantities of fresh ground water of good quality.  Yields of wells



range from 50 to as much as 600 gallons per minute (gpm).




     The rocks of the Monongahela Formation do not yield large



quantities of ground water to wells.  However, these aquifers are



developed because they are the only practical source of water sup-



ply for rural residents, dairy farms, and business firms not served



by central public supply systems.  Yields of wells tapping these



rocks range from 1 to 20 gpm.



     More than half the basin is underlain by rocks of the Conemaugh



Formation, which is an important source of ground water.  Yields of



20 to 150 gallons per minute are common for individual wells devel-



oped in favorable hydrogeologic areas.



     Figure 2 is a small scale generalized map showing the poten-



tial ground water resources, based on information that is presently



available.  However, major ground water developments for communities



and industries at specific sites usually require detailed studies



and exploratory drilling to fully define the hydrologic character-



istics of the water-bearing rocks.  In the first stages of devel-




oping large supplies, all wells must be considered as test wells

-------
until their ultimate capacity is established by controlled pumping




tests.



     In general, the chemical quality of the ground water in the



basin is much better than the chemical quality of the streams.



The ground water is, with some exceptions, satisfactory for most



ordinary uses with little or no treatment or disinfection.  In



some places, however, the iron content and hardness is high enough




to require some treatment in both private and public supplies.



Chloride content is usually low in shallow aquifers, but at depths



of several hundred feet below the major streams chloride content



can be quite high in some areas.



     In certain localities, ground water of better chemical quality



can be obtained by drilling to an alternate aquifer, but detailed



study of local geologic conditions certainly is necessary to deter-



mine the most favorable aquifers and well development procedures.



Available water-treatment methods can alleviate most of the ground



water quality problems.



     Coal mining can affect the local occurrence of ground water,



but the total basinwide effect is apparently negligible.   Mined



areas act as additional drainageways for the discharge of ground



water and, in a few local places, apparently have caused a lowering



of water levels.  The effects of mining on the chemical quality of



the ground water apparently does not extend much beyond the immedi-



ate area of mining activities.

-------

-------
                         COAL MINING






     The counties comprising the Kiskiminetas River basin have




been among the most significant coal producing areas in the Com-




monwealth.  During 1968, these Counties, Armstrong, Cambria,



Indiana, Somerset, and Westmoreland produced 28 million tons of



soft coal.  The greatest production was nearly eight million tons



in Cambria County while Westmoreland County produced the least



with three million tons (7).






Armstrong County



     Armstrong County has been a significant coal producing area



for many years.  There are about twenty coal beds in Armstrong



County.  During 1968, production was reported from six major seams.



These included Middle and Upper Kittanning, Lower and Upper Free-




port, Mahoning, and the Pittsburgh Coal seams.  Coal production



totalled 6.6 million tons with deep mine production equalling



about two-thirds of the total production.



     Coal reserves in Armstrong County are contained principally



in two seams.  These are the Upper Freeport and Lower Kittanning.



Reserves contained in beds of less economic significance include



the Pittsburgh, Lower Freeport, Upper and Middle Kittanning, and



Clarion seams.  In total, it has been estimated that Armstrong



County contains approximately 500 million tons of recoverable coal



reserves.  This reserve is contained in beds 28 inches or more



thick (8).
                             27

-------
Cambria County



     There are 2U recognizable coal beds in Cambria County.   The



County is, and has been in the past, one of the largest coal pro-



ducing areas in the state.  The Lower Kittanning coal is probably



the most persistent bed in the county.  Many of the large active



deep mines in Cambria County are in the Lower Kittanning seam.



Other important coal seams in the county include the Upper Kittan-



ning, Lower Freeport, and Upper Freeport.  During 1968, production




was also reported in the Middle Kittanning and Brookville seams.



It has been estimated that this county contains more than 800 million



tons of recoverable coal reserves in beds 28 inches or more thick (9).






Indiana County




     During I960, production was reported from five coal beds in




Indiana County.  These beds included Lower and Upper Kittanning,



Lower and Upper Freeport, and the Pittsburgh coals.  The Lower



Kittanning and Upper Freeport seams are the most economically im-



portant.  In 1968, county production totalled 6.6 million tons.



Surface mining methods contributed only about 0.8 million tons of



this figure.



     Major coal reserves in Indiana County are contained in eight



seams.  However, the Lower Kittanning and Lower and Upper Freeport



seams are the most significant and contain the major portion of the



reserve.  Recoverable reserves in beds 28 inches and more thick are



estimated at 900 million tons (10).
                            28

-------
Somerset County



     Production was reported from ten coal seams in Somerset



County during 1968.  These included Clarion, Lower, Middle and




Upper RLttanning, Lower and Upper Freeport, Brush Creek, Pitts-



burgh, Redstone, and the Sewickley coal beds.  The Upper and




Lower Kittanning seams are among the most important.  In 1968>



county production totalled about four million tons.  Surface




raining methods accounted for about 60 percent of the total pro-




duction.



     Recoverable coal reserves in Somerset County are contained



in the following seams:  Upper Kittanning, Lower Kittanning, Upper



Freeport, Lower Freeport, Middle Kittanning, Clarion, Pittsburgh



and Redstone.  The order of listing also designates the order of



importance assigned to these seams.  The Pittsburgh and Redstone




contain only a very minor portion of the total reserve.  Recover-



able reserves 28 inches or more thick in Somerset County are esti-



mated at 700 million tons.  (11)





Westmoreland County



     There are sixteen coal beds of minable thickness in Westmore-



land County.  In 1968, production was reported in the Lower and



Upper Freeport, Pittsburgh, and Redstone coal seams.  In 1968,



county production totalled about three million tons.  Surface



mining methods produced less than one-quarter million tons.



     From the standpoint of reserves, there are two major coal




beds in Westmoreland County.  These are the Pittsburgh and Upper
                           .29

-------
Freeport.  The Waynesburg, Redstone, Lower Freeport, and Lower



Kittanning are of only minor importance.   In beds 28 inches and



more thick, it is estimated that the recoverable coal reserve in



Westmoreland County is in excess of 825 million tons (12).



     Total recoverable coal reserves in the five county area com-



prising the Kiskiminetas River basin are estimated in excess of



3,700 million tons.  A substantial portion of this reserve is



located outside the basin boundary.  However, that portion of



the reserve within the Kiskiminetas River drainage area is more



than adequate to insure steady and continued mining for many years.

-------
KISKIMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
              MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
                        31

-------
                  KISKIMINETAS RIVER,  MAIN  STEM
                      AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES

                     MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY

                     SUWARY AND CONCLUSIONS


1.  The main stem Kiskiminetas River and its minor  tributaries

drain an area of 216 square miles.   The entire  length  of  the  Kis-

kiminetas River between its formation at Saltsburg  to  its confluence

with the Allegheny River at Schenley,  Pennsylvania  is  seriously  pol-

luted as a result of coal mine discharges.   This  water quality deg-

radation results from discharges within the drainage boundary as

well as from massive amounts of mine drainage inflow contributed

by Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River.
2.  A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,U?5  acres

of surface mined area were investigated in the study area.   Dis-

charges from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 1,008 gpm

and totalled nearly 6.k million gallons per day (mgd).   The total

net acid load discharged by the 89 sources was 57,880 Ib/day.


3.  At the time of the survey, active operations were limited  to

two drift mines.  At the time of sampling, one of the active mines

contributed an acid load of 3,3^0 Ib/day (Mine No.  5871).   However,

treatment facilities have since been installed at this mine and it

is reported that the treatment facility operates within the standards

imposed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.   The second mine  was not

operating at inspection and at that time contributed only a negligible

discharge.
                             32

-------
     Refuse piles and abandoned drift mines were the major sources of



pollution in the study area.  These sources contributed about 85 per-



cent of the total net acid load discharged by all sources in the



vatershed.





k.  A total of 17 principal sources of mine drainage discharge  vere



located in the study area.  These sources discharged a total net acid



load of 46,613 lb/day.  This represents about 8l percent of the acid



load discharged by all sources In the vatershed.







                       DESCTOPTICK OF AREA





     The Kiskiminetas River is formed by the confluence of the Cone-



maugh River and Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg, Pennsylvania.  From



this point the liver flows generally northwest through the communities



of Apollo,  Vandergrlft, and Leechburg, to its confluence with the



Allegheny River at Schenley.  The river is approximately 27 miles



in length and drains an area of 216 square miles.



          Beaver Run and Blacklegs Creek with drainage areas of 55



square miles and l»-5 square miles respectively, are the principal



tributaries to the main stem Kiskiminetas River.





                       STREAM WATBl QUALITY





     Due to the grossly polluted acid condition of both Loyalhanna



Creek and the Conemaugh River, the Kiskiminetas River exhibits



similar water quality conditions over its entire length.  Particularly
                             33

-------
in the Saltsburg area, the river carries the characteristic iron



discoloration of mine drainage waters.   The river bed and high water



levels are heavily stained and coated with precipitated iron compounds.



Alkaline tributary inflow entering the river below Saltsburg is



immediately assimilated with no noticeable water quality improvement



in the main stem.



     During the course of the field study several stream locations



were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 3, Figure 3)-  These



stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine



drainage.  A summary of the stream data is presented in Table U.



The water quality data collected below the Conemaugh and Loyalhanna



Reservoirs are also included in this data summary.  This data reflects



the background water quality of the tributaries which form the



Kiskiminetas River.



     All but one of the above streams are affected by mine drainage



discharges to some degree.  Roaring Run is the one exception.  Although



there are extensive underground mining operations in the immediate



area of Roaring Run, there are no significant mine effluents discharged



directly to the stream.  However, Roaring Run is affected and similar



in appearance to the many mine drainage degraded streams in the



surrounding vicinity.  Near its lower reach the tributary is in con-



tinual contact with a coal seam which outcrops in the stream bed.  From



this point to its confluence with the Kiskiminetas River the stream



is highly discolored.

-------
                                        TABLE
                        Stream Water Quality Sampling Stations
                  Kiskiminetas River, Main Stem and Minor Tributaries
Station No.
  Sampling Period
      Stream
        Location
   5619

   5292

   5617

   5206

   5618

   5626

   5627

   5628

   5629
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968

July, Oct, Nov, 1968

Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968

May, June, 1971

Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968

Nov, Dec, 1968

Nov, Dec, 1968

Nov, Dec, 1968

Nov, Dec, 1968
Conemaugh River

Loyalhanna Creek

Wo1ford Run

Blacklegs Creek

Sulphur Run

Roaring Run

Beaver Run

Kiskiminetas River

Kiskiminetas River
USGS gage below reservoir

USGS gage below reservoir

Near mouth

Near mouth

Near mouth

Near mouth

Near mouth

Vandergrift, Pa.

Near mouth
                                       35

-------
luminum
1 Ib/dav
^
>
a T
« -».
C A
Cfl iH
9
$?
8
>
85
H ^
CD
4J rH
H §
ai t:
w *^
nJ xi

•H fl)
•o -o
2s
cd <->
4J *^>
O C
H E
 o
r*. fv ro
m m
m r^ m
r^ r^ o
CM r-l CM
CM 00 CO
r-4 t-t
ON *J CO
r-l CO «-t
r^. co o
rH CT\ r^-
co in o
1-4 r- a*
•-I CM O
I^H >J QO
t-4 i-l
§o o
CM O
CTs O
 CM 00
m r-t oo
.-i i-i
O o m
O r-l 00
m CM t-t
^o o o
 •d- tn
•3- oo
00 00
55553
O CO *N
CM i-f <
t-l f-t 1-*
o
rH
^ r r
in
VO 00 00
ON ^£> r*
O CM v£>
m CM
CM
*J CO CO
ro t^ r*
in co r-i
m co
CM
CM -^ r»
m •<»• co
O CM O>
in in o>
<^ r-
CM
O in CM
m -sfr a\
O CO O
in o *tf
t-4 CM CO
 ^
^r- in
^S oTcs'
<* CM vO
i-T ^
o o >*
o -* o
 <0
t-i o m
i-H CO t-4
CM
ON
CM ~ -
m
in m r-i
O — i o
^ o o
t-l CM
rv o o
vO CM r-l
*» m co
-tf m
r^ \o o\
m o\ CM
r- in c**
O fi-Jb
rH  op O
rv ofc 
vo m
o o
m o
CO -st
VO v*
CM -3"
o\  p-4
00 I O
CM 1 ix.
l>- 1 ON
r-t 1 CM
8 ! a
a : °°
CO ON i-
01 *
C£^

in vo m
ro m vo
rH f^
r*. co co
m CM CM
CO
CM r^ vo
m ON o
rH * CM
CM
•^ m CM
VO rH rH
CM f-l rH
O ro m
rH ON in
CM CO CO
CM
CM CM \O
vo m o
CM rH ,-1
§o o
CM£§
i-4
co m r>-
Im IA ON
00 O 00
co in h»
CO ^0
Soo oo
vO vO
rH O -tf
CM
vO
CM
vO= =
in
U-l O rH
CO ON CM
•-H ro vo
m -tf co
ON co CM
i-t en
o oo r-.
\o r* ON
<}• ON
m oo 0
.-i ^
O 1 O
00 1 *£>
00 ' OO
2 S3
0 0
rH CO
m i m
oo i m
in i CM
i
*tf VO
.* vO ON
SCM^.
^vO  -H
1
1
1
0 1 0
r- i ON
m i CM
t
1 ' i
i i i
! I 1
i i i
i i i
i i t
i i i
•^ vo r^
CO ON ON
CM
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
ITi vO O
CM O CO

-------
                         FiGu^t 3





KISKMNtTAS fl V£R  MA NS~!tM AND  MINOR  TRIBUTARIES

-------
     The U5 square mile drainage area of Blacklegs Creek was not




included during the 1968 field inventory of the Kiskiminetaa River




basin.  There were several reasons for its exclusion.   During 1966




the Blacklegs Creek drainage area was selected as an area represent-




ative of coal mine drainage problems in the Allegheny River basin.




As a result of this selection, a field investigation in this area




was conducted during the summer of 1966.   During the 1968 coopera-




tive study, it was decided that a reinvestigation of Blacklegs




Creek would be conducted only if sufficient time was available.




Since this was not the case, the area was deleted from study.   In




preparation of this report, it was decided that a limited reinvesti-




gation should be conducted in the Blacklegs Creek drainage area.   In




May of 1971, a three-day survey was performed in order to determine




the current status of coal mine operations on Blacklegs Creek.  At




this time, it was determined that the stream water quality, number




and type of discharging mines, active mines, etc., had not been




significantly altered since the 1966 study.  As a result, except




where noted in the following text, the Blacklegs Creek mine drain-



age data reflects the conditions as measured during 1966.






                  SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE




     Approximately 150 mining sites and an estimated 1,1*75 acres  of




strip mined area were investigated in this study.  Samples for chemical




analysis were collected from 89 sources discharging at the time of the
                             38

-------
•survey.   The total  effluent volume from all  sources was ^,U39



 or 6.U million  gallons per day  (mgd).  The total net acid load dis-



 charged to the  main stem Kiskiminetas River  and its tributaries was



 57,880 Ib/day.




     A description  of the mine  drainage sources follows.  All mine



 site locations  inventoried in this area are  shown in Figure k.






 Main Stem - Unnamed tributaries below Saltsburg




     Approximately  0.9 mile below the formation of the Kiskiminetas



 River, several  small unnamed tributaries enter the main stem.  Seven



 underground and four surface mines were inventoried on these small



 tributaries.  Discharges were located at three of these sites.  Mine



 No. 5537  was an inactive drift  mine located  near the headwaters of



 one tributary.   This mine contributed a 12 gpm discharge which carried



 an acid load of 399 Ib/day.  The second discharge (Mine No. 5539) was



 located at the  base of a highwall in a strip mined area.  It appeared



 that this area  may  have been drift mined prior to the surface opera-



 tion.  The acid load was 62 Ib/day.  A U5 gpm effluent was sampled



 at Mine No. 5538, an abandoned  drift mine.   The acid load was 508 Ib/day.





 Blacklegs Creek






     Only a limited number of surface mines  were investigated along



 the north side  of Blacklegs Creek below Big  Run.  These surface mines,



 as well as several  underground  mine openings, were dry.
                              39

-------
     Three discharges on Big Run are responsible for the major



portion of the total acid mine drainage load discharged in the Black-



legs Creek watershed.  These sources include Mine No.'s 6oU, 605 and




5207.



     Mine No. 604 is located adjacent to the gravel road which runs



along Big Run.  The actual discharge point is below the road bed



almost at stream level.  At road level only a slight hillside depres-



sion indicates the possible presence of the old drift opening.  The




measured effluent was 32^ gpm which carried an acid load of 1,750



Ib/day.



     Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of Mine No. 604 a second major



source of mine acid discharge was located on a small unnamed tributary



to Big Run.  This was Mine No. 5207.  This site was not located during



the initial 1966 survey and was found and sampled for the first time



in May 1971-  It was not determined if this site represents a mine



opening or a breakout point from an underground mine located elsewhere



in the general area.  The 310 gpm effluent carried an acid load of



1,618 Ib/day.



     Mine No. 605 is the third major source of mine drainage discharge



on Big Run.  The measured effluent was 675 gpm and carried an acid



load of 3,^3 Ib/day.  An additional acid load of ^50 Ib/day was



received by Big Run from Mine No. 606 located almost directly across



from  Mine No. 605.



     Extensive mine operations were at one time operative near the
                             1.0

-------
community of Iselin cm Harpers Run.  All that presently remains



are large gob piles and several miles of unreclaimed contour surface



mines.  During 1966 two minor sources of acid discharge were collected



from one of the mine refuse dumps.  In the later (1971) reinvestigation



of the area these two sources were not located.  The failure to relocate



these sources could be a hydrologic function but more likely these two



effluents may have been abated by an Operation Scarlift program which



has occured during the five year interval.  The Scarlift program was



directed toward extinguishment of a fire burning in one of the refuse



dumps.  The subsequent covering of portions of the pile may have



eliminated the discharges.



     The headwater area of Whiskey Run has been extensively mined.  A



total of 21 samples were collected, 14 of which were discharging at



the time of inspection.  Mine No. 631 was the only significant source



of acid discharge located in the Whiskey Run drainage area.  This mine



is one of several openings in the immediate area; however, the others



were dry.  The 60 gpm effluent from Mine No. 631 carried an acid load



of 396 lb/day.



     The last significant mine discharge in the Blacklegs Creek area



was located on an unnamed tributary near the headwaters of the stream.



At this site (Mine No. 6U6) an effluent of 1,008 gpm was discharged



to the receiving tributary.  The alkalinity concentration of the



effluent was 267 mg/1 with a resultant alkaline load of 3,330 lb/day.



Although alkaline, the discharge is grossly discolored and as a result



several miles of downstream Blacklegs Creek are similarly discolored.

-------
Sulphur Run





     The 1,8 square mile drainage area of Sulphur Run Is polluted by



mine drainage over much of its length.  Several very old underground



mines have been located on the tributary.  Six surface mines were



also inspected.  Four point source discharges were located.  Bach of



the discharge points appear to represent old mine openings) however,



the surface mines may have created additional openings when they



Intersected the mine voids.  A considerable amount of mine refuse is



scattered about the area and is in contact with several hundred yards



of main stem Sulphur Run.  The acid load discharged by the four sources



totalled 503 lb/day (Mine No.'s 5878, 5&79, 5880; and 5881).  One



active strip mine was investigated; however, it was dry.



     Stream sampling at the mouth of Sulphur Run (Station No. 5618)



indicated acid load values ranging from 1,200 lb/day to 1,600 lb/day



(Table 3).  It is readily apparent that the stream carried acid loads



far in excess of the load values contributed by the mine discharges.



This is due to the numerous small seepage areas in the watershed which



were not measureable and therefore not directly quantifiable.





Long Run





     This tributary drains an eight mile area north of Avonmore on



the opposite side of the river.  A few abandoned surface and underground



mines as well as one active underground mine were inventoried on



this tributary.  The surface nines in the area are associated with  snail

-------
drift mines.  Two of these abandoned combination mines were discharging



and contributed a total acid load of 29 Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5873,587^)-



     The active David mine of Canterbury Coal Company was located north



of Maysville.  At the time of Inspection a ^00 gpm discharge vas sampled.



The acid load carried by this effluent vas 3.3^0 Ib/day.  However, treat-



ment facilities were nearly complete on the sampling date.  At the pre-



sent time these facilities are in operation.  The treatment supplied is



generally adequate; however, the discharge rate has occasionally



exceeded the capacity of the treatment facility.  As a result the final



effluent has not always met effluent standards required by Pennsylvania



for active mine discharges.  It has been reported that the company has



applied for a new permit for an additional borehole and treatment



facility to alleviate the present overload.



     Another active drift mine was located along the bank of the



Kiskiminetas River approximately 0.5 mile below the confluence of



Long Run.  The mine was not operating at the time of inspection and there



was no discharge from the opening at this site.  This mine was under



ownership by the Alt«ire Brothers Coal Company.





Wolford Run





     Cn the opposite bank of the river, Wolford Run was the next down-



stream tributary affected by mine drainage discharges.  The tributary



drains 9-8 square miles and enters the river near the community of



Sallna.  The stream is degraded in the headwater area and remains so



along its entire downstream length.

-------
     Five mine discharges were sampled in the head-water area.  These



discharges resulted from a combination of both surface and underground



mine operations.  The total discharge was 53 gpm and the acid load was



1,119 Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5530, 5531, 5532, 5533, 5531*)-  Along the



mid-reach of the stream a series of combination surface and underground



mines discharged high acid loads.  Mine No.'s 5535, 5536, and 5537



contributed an acid load of nearly 1,700 Ib/day.  There were no



additional mine effluents draining to Volford Run.  However, large mine



refuse areas near Salina contributed significant amounts of acidity



through sub-surface seepage directly to Wolford Run.



     During the course of the field study Wolford Run was sampled for



water quality analysis on three occassions (Table 3)-  On each occassion



the water quality was highly degraded as a direct result of abandoned



mine discharges.  The acid load measured near the mouth of the stream



ranged from 8,000 Ib/day to a maximum of Uo,000 Ib/day.



     Two additional discharge points were located in the immediate



area.  Mine No.'s 55^0 and 55^1 are located along the bank of the



river just downstream of Salina.  Due to their proximity these openings



may have been interconnected with the mine at Salina or may have



served as drainage points for the mine.  The combined acid load



carried by these discharges was 369 Ib/day.





Kisklminetas River, malnstem - Brownstown area





     Mining operations along both banks of the Klskiminetas  River in



the Brownstown  area have been extensive.  Thirteen mine and  mine

-------
associated discharges were located In this area.  The cumulative acid



load discharged directly to the river by these sources was nearly



35,000 Ib/day.  This represents about tvo-thirdjpof the total acidity



discharged from all sources in the Kiskiminetas River mainstern area.



     The Leechburg Mining Company operates an active drift mine at



Brownstown.  Although there are numerous abandoned mine discharges in



the immediate area, there were no discharges emanating  directly from



this mine.  The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania regards the mine as dry



and does not attribute any of the surrounding discharges to the active



operation.  A very large refuse area is associated with this mine.  The



refuse is trucked to the hilltop and scattered over approximately 100



acres.  At the time of inventory numerous immeasurable seepage areas



were observed along the bottom edge of this waste pile.  In addition



to these seepage areas a total of five discharges were directly



attributed to the pile.  The combined acid load contributed by these



discharges was 22,1*35 Ib/day (No.'s 55^, 5588, 5590, 5591, and 5592).



The seepage areas and discharge points have destroyed trees and other



vegetation as the highly mineralized water flows over the hillside to



the Kiskiminetas River some ^00 feet below.  One additional sample of



refuse pile drainage was found upstream of the Brownstovn complex.  The



acid load was ?8 Ib/day (Ho. 558?).



     Six discharges of underground origin were also located in the



Brownstown area   It Is difficult to determine the number of drift



mine openings in the area but it appears that there have been several



openings in at least three different coal seams   Discharging under-



ground mine sites contributed an acid load in excess of 12,000 Ib/day



(Mine Ho.'s 55^2, 55^3, 5582, 55&3, 5585, 5586, and 5589)-  The major

-------
portion of this load was discharged by No.'s 5583 and 5589.   Mine



No. 5583 was a partially open drift mine with a flow rate of 80 gpm.



The 195 gpm discharge at No.  5589 emanates  from the base of a caved



opening about 60 vertical feet above the river.  The opening may have



served as a fanway or drainway for the nearby mines.






Roaring Run



     This tributary drains a lU square mile area and joins the



Kiskiminetas River about 1.5 miles downstream of Brownstown.  As



mentioned in an earlier section of this document, the water quality



of Roaring Run is degraded due to a coal outcrop in the stream bed



near its lower end.  Approximately twelve strip mines and seven



drift openings were located within the drainage area of the tributary.



All but one of these operations were dry.  Mine No. 5876 contributed



an acid load of only 5 Ibs/day.  The mine appeared to be an active



operation^ however, a local resident stated that the mine had worked



on only a limited basis since it was opened.  Two additional drift



mines were in operation on Roaring Run.  These were the Casella Bros.



and Swiss Coal Company mines.  Both operations were dry.  The status



of the Casella mine is not known but it has been reported that the



Swiss mine has been closed since the date of inventory.



     Stream sampling and gaging at the mouth of Roaring Run (Station




No. 5626) indicated acid load values ranging from 1,210 Ibs/day to



21,355 Ibs/day.  (Table 3).  On each occasion, the alkalinity con-



centration was depleted to zero and other mine drainage parameters



including iron, manganese, and aluminum were high.

-------
Beaver Run





     Approximately 40 surface mines and 15 underground mine openings



were located vithln the 55 square mile drainage area of Beaver Run.



The tributary joins the Kiskiminetas River Just above the community of



Apollo and on the opposite bank.  The large Beaver Run Reservoir Is



located within this sub-basin.  The reservoir is for water supply and



pumps via aqueduct to communities outside the Kiskimlnetas River



drainage area.



     The first source of mine drainage pollution to enter Beaver Run



was located on an unnamed tributary west of the junction of Routes 66



and 22.  In this area a 2 gpm discharge was collected at the base of a



refuse pile.  The acid load discharged by this source (No. 560*0 was



only 8 Ib/day.



     A series of surface and underground mines were located on the east



bank of Beaver Run and on Porters Run along the eastern finger of the



reservoir.  The only mine which contributed a significant discharge was



No. 5550-  The source of this discharge was cumulative seepage along



the bottom edge of a strip mine.



     The major portion of the discharging mine sites located in the



headwaters of Beaver Run were found along Thorn Run.  Thorn Run forms



the western finger of the reservoir.  Seven discharging sites were



located.  The combined flow was 32 gpm and the acid load totalled



9^9 Ib/day.  (Mine No.'s 5605, 5606, 5607, 5612, 5613, 561^, and



5615).  Mine No. 5612 contributed nearly one-half of the total acid



load.  At this site an old drift portal has been stripped out and
                             1*7

-------
covered over by the backfill of the surface mine.  However, at the base



of the backfill a 5 gpm discharge was located.  The acid load was



kkk Ib/day.  Additional significant acid loads were discharged by Mine



No.'s 5605 and 560?.  Mine 5605 vas a partially open drift mine



(119 Ib/day) and the discharge from Mine No. 5607 resulted from seepage



along the bottom edge of a surface mine (19^ Ib/day).  One surface mine



was in operation on Thorn Run during the survey but was dry.



     With the exception of the mine described on the headwaters of



Beaver Run and Thorn Run, there were no additional mining operations



on any tributaries draining directly to Beaver Run Reservoir.  All



remaining operations were located below the drainage area of the



reservoir.



     Immediately below the reservoir an acid load of 3,167 Ib/day was



discharged to Beaver Run by two drainage sources.  (Mine No.'s 55^7,



and 55^)-  These sources were located within a  strip mined area below



the reservoir filtration plant.  At least  one drift opening and possible



others were located in the base of the hlghwall.  The drift mouth was



dry; however, discharges emanating from the base of the highwall were



located on both sides of the portal.  The  discharge from Mine No. 55*»6



was 110 gpm and carried an acid load of 2,90U Ib/day.  The acid load



from No. 55^7 vas 263 Ib/day.  The last significant acid load discharged



to Beaver Run was from Mine No. 55^6.  At  this point cumulative



seepage from a strip mined area discharged an acid load of 259 Ib/day.



     Stream sampling near the mouth of Beaver Run  (Station No. 5627)



Indicated acid load values ranging from 3,986 Ib/day to 15,628 Ib/day



(Table 3)-

-------
Klskiminetas River, Apollo to mouth





     There vere only a limited number of mining operations located along



the remaining downstream length of the Kisklmlnetas River or its minor



tributaries.



     One drainage source was located on Sugar Hollow which Joins the



main stem in the community of Apollo.  A 5 gpm flow which carried an



acid load of 80 lb/day was located in this area.  The discharge



originates in a small gully on the south side of Route 56.  There is some



coal refuse scattered about but it was difficult to determine if a mine



was once located here or whether the gully was simply a convenient



dumping location.  If the latter is the case, it may be that a small



hillside spring is percolating through the refuse and becoming degraded.



The drainage is then piped under Route 56 and into Sugar Hollow.



     The next downstream area affected by mine drainage was Pine Run.



The tributary drains an area of 18 square miles but the mine operations



had been limited to the area just above its mouth.  Four discharges



were located along the banks of the tributary.  A strip mine extends



several hundred yards along one bank of the tributary.  It appears that



this operation has completely destroyed or covered the portal to an



underground mine operation.  In addition, numerous intersections with



the underground void were created.  There was continous seepage along



the length of the surface mine as well as three major discharge points.



These discharges, No.'s 5608, 5609, and 5610, contributed a combined



acid load of 1,088 lb/day.  On the opposite bank of the tributary a



180 gpm effluent was located.  The discharge emerged via pipe from the

-------
base of the hill and carried an acid load of 2,808 Ib/day.   There



were no obvious indications of mining on this side of Pine  Run.



However, the pipe may serve as a drainway to a mine on this side of the



creek which was not located.



     Mine No. 589^ was located on the Kiskiminetas River just above



the confluence of Carnahan Run.  The discharge emanates from a time-



red and partially open drift mouth about 20 vertical feet above



Route 66.  The 60 gpm discharge is piped under the highway  and directly



into the river.  The acid load was 180 Ib/day.  What appears to be a



second opening to this mine was located on the back side of the hill



facing Carnahan Run.  This opening was dry.  There is a drive-in



theatre at the site of this second opening and it appeared that much



of the parking area was constructed of mine refuse.



     Four additional drift mines were located on Carnahan Run and



all were dry.  This includes an active drift mine operated by the



Kaskan Coal Company.



     Guffy Run was the next downstream tributary affected by mine



drainage.  A series of seven drift openings were located, and all but



one of these openings were dry.  At Mine No. 5895» a discharge of 162 gpm



was measured.  The acid load carried by the effluent was 1*57 Ibs/day.



     Across from Guffy Run on the opposite bank of the Kiskiminetas



River a small discharge from an old drift mine was located.  This was



Mine No. 5899 in the community of Hyde Park.  The acid load was negli-



gible.



     Below the community of Leechburg, several mine openings were

-------
located at the Bite of the abandoned Maher Mine.  All but one of the




openings were dry.  At Mine Ho. 3896 a 72 gpm effluent was located.



The discharge point Is above road level and the effluent cascades



down the steep hillside and Is piped under the highway to the river.




The acid load was 239 Ib/day.



     Mine No.'s 5^97 and 5898 were the last downstream sources of mine



drainage discharge inventoried in the study area.  Mine Ho. 5897



contributed an acid load of 122 Ib/day and Mine Mo. 5898 contributed



an acid load of 672 Ib/day.








     A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,^75 acres



of strip mined area were investigated during this study.  The total



measured discharge was ^,^39 gPm or nearly 6.1* mgd.  Table 5 presents



an area breakdown in terms of the total flow and total loading (Ib/day)



of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams In the



Kiskiminetas main stem and tributary areas.  Table 6 presents a



summary of flow volumes and chemical loadings by source type for the



89 discharging sources inventoried during the study.





                        POLLUTION ABATEMENT
     As shown in Table 6, refuse piles and inactive or abandoned drift



nines are the principal pollution sources within the study area.  There



are also a few major pollution sources emanating from the other source



types.  It is readily apparent that pollution abatement activities in



the main stem Kiskiminetas River would be of little or no value due to

-------

-------















CO
CU
•H
B Cd
cd 4->
>-i XI
4-J »H
CO S-l
4-1
60
C rl
•H O
> c
•H -H
0) B
0
cu *o
rJ C
cd

n B
CU
CO 4J
60 CO
c c
•H -H
Cd C
0
i — 1 ^
(1) 0)
W) >
cd «H
C "
•H
cd en
Td -U
0)
CD C
C *H
*H G
S *iH
Vr*
en
•H
tJM

















3 ">
C rt
•H "rd
g ^
r-l r-l
< ^
CO ^>
0) n!
d -a

60X1
c d
X~>
r-l >
cd c cd
4J O T3
O t-t --.
H H 4?
I— 1
*+^



QJ t>
•U cd
cd T3
"4-1 "--^
•-t X>
3 rH
CO ^>




W *-N
r-J 0) >
cd 
IS 4J >
•H cd
r-l TJ 13
0) -H ^
4J 0 XI
0 <; rH
E-l N_<


a)

•H
CU
o
r?
O 0 r--
00 00 ON
M




O i—* ON
CM r- 1 CO
1— 1
O CO r-t
vjO O"N CM
r-< i— 1 in
n
m





r-i o m
CO 1 — VD

CO






CM ON ON
in m oo
m







CM VO 00



CU
0 >
4-1 -rl
C &
co 3
Xi Prf co
C -H rt
p M 13 4J
B- -U tJ 4-i cd 2 A:
r-4 C CO
O C -H
"2 p |ij

^ r- 1
1-1




oo m


CO i — 1
 ^ (j a)
B w 01 B
cd »H > cd
C W fd d
C a) 3
D PQ P
 O
I—I <)•

O r— t 00 O ^D
CO r-l 00 CO
r-l







O\ -s^ r^* r—t £t~)

f-^







r^ v£> ^o o^ o")
r-< r-4 CvJ O\ rO
CO CSJ 
V.D rH T-H f^O 00
 CM i — ' ^o co




O O O
4J 4J 4J

CO CO CO
3 -H 3 l-l C -H
4J d 4J 04 4J 3
rl rl 5 (2
> aj 4-* a) M a) 60
cSco^odPciJ
C Xj C C
o m CM
in CM





CM in ^o
-*


r— 1 CM CO
CM
«,
rH





VO CM UO
in co ^
o m m
r.
CTl







CO O ON
m o co
m in r-i
•s
I—I







\O ON CO
ON m o
oo CM in
rt
CO







ON vj" VO
CM CO CO
CO







 »N
r^ co CM







O ON oo
\o oo ON
r^ oo O
•SAW
CO NO r-l







00 CO O
r-l \D \O
4r\ *\ >S
ro m *-H
1






O <^ »H
CNJ m rH
O O CO
#% n
rH rH





-3" ro t>4




cu o
a) u
^i
U co
CO -H
60 M
a) u
i— i
^1 C -O
U 3 CU
Ci] pq C
ra 60 c
•H C
oa D
r-l 0
co





^D ^*


O CM
r-l








ON v^f
•— I CM
00









CO CO
r-l 00










ON r-l
ON
m









CO r-l
O
rH







CO r-l
r-l



O
4J

CO C
c 5 £
3 rl
C « 4J >
3 cu
CU O) CO
00 rM E -H
•H CO cd X!
PQ -H C 5
*?£
ON
r*^
ON




VD
ON
CO
CM
o
00

00





o
o
o
n
CXJ
OO






in
CM
m
n
m
CM






0
00
oo
A
r---
m






ON
ro
%
v^-





ON
OO







CO
H
g

-------




















CO
•rl
(j
rt
0) AJ
I?"2

Jj
CU 4J
U
3 0
0 C
0) 1-4

^
x> -a
i C
vr> co nj
60
U C 6
>J -H OJ
CO *O AJ

ClJ T-l
M OS
•O
09
cu a)
C AJ
S C
1-1
e
•H

CO
•H



























3"x T
C tfl

3 xi
.

W M
r
n) X>
4J i-l
O v^
H


^Hy
OJ >.
AJ ni
rt -a'
M-l •»*_
r-l XI
3 -"
to '•-'



OJ /—
i-l CO >
rt OJ rt
AJ d "d
o -d ^.
H U X>
crj r-^




AJ
OJ >»./-<
55 AJ >
fl H
rH H3 "O
AJ 0 XI
O < r-l
H v^



60
r-l tJ /->
2 J §
o u w
H co^
•H
Q


CO
*4-4 Ci)
O CJ
tj
• 3
O O
S3 W





cu
^
H

u
3
O
CO




m co CM m
oo vO co r**
CM m oo
r-l




CO VO CM •*
co m r-i m
CM


in i-4 r~- oo
p^ oo ON r*^
1-1 r-l ON
r-l 4 s*^ 5 ^^ *H ^^ * *W
4J O M Q)
CO O O BJ
co oo
m vo
r-l





ON CM
co



m CM
CO CO
r-l CM







CM O
r-l VO
r-i in
r-. r^






CM in
O O
•d- vo

CO CO






»n o
vO CO
CO CO
CO CO
1







r-l 00
0 0
^ o
ft
1-1







CM r-l







^
•a
CO CO CU
CU *-\ OJ C
C cu CO
S^i gS
4J rt
AJ O AJ XI
M-I n) <*-i crj
•H >^ n) '<^

Q co
CO







0




•^









,_
00








CO
r-









r>k
vo










^











fm








S*>
g
•r
•-1 4J
r-4 U
A) C
3 c
•r
r-l V— •
•H
O
ON
r**.
ON
CM




vO
ON
CO


CM
O
00
00






o
o
0
ft
CM
00





in
CM
m
ft
in
CM





o
00
oo
rJ*
m







ON
CO
^r
*
^^







ON
00











ry\
t I
^J
fH
C?
H

















•
cfl
2
rt
-d
(U
C
•H
6
a)
g
rt
CO
OJ
x:
AJ

C
Tl

AJ
•^
*J

T3
OJ
AJ
tfl
U
O
r-l
CO
cu
rj
1

*o
s
o
i-i
ff
4)
n^
c
3
C
rt

cu
u
fl)

*J
3
CO
II
CO
Q)
c
•l-l
s
c
o
•H
AJ
s
•H
X)

o
O
*

-------
tha massive amounts of mine drainage which are received upstream by



Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River.  Complete elimination of all



mine drainage problems in this study area vould likely result In an



insignificant water quality improvement in the main stem Kiskimlnetas



River.  For this reason pollution abatement activities are Justified only



at such a time when consideration can be given to a total river basin



abatement program which has achieved drainage control on a downstream



priority basis.  However, abatement of a single source Q? nine complex



within the study area may also have merit as a demonstration site for



the feasibility study of a particular mine drainage abatement problem.



     Based on the initial field survey sampling program it was shown



that 17 of the 89 discharging sites contributed about 8l percent of the



total acid load measured in the study area.  The combined acid load of



these sources was in excess of 23 tons per day.  Assuming previous or



concurrent abatement of upstream sites, drainage control at these IT



principal sites should result in an improvement of the water quality in



the main stem Kiskiminetas River.  Perhaps the most significant reduction



in acid load from any source type could be attained through drainage



control at the large mine refuse area near Brownstown.  The total acid



load discharging from areas around the waste dump was nearly 11 tons



per day.



     The IT principal sources mentioned above can provide a relative



indication of where the major pollution problems occur in the study area.



In the KiBkiminetas River mainstem and minor tributary area, all sites



which contributed an acid load in excess of 600 Ib/day are considered

-------
as principal sources.



     Detailed engineering studies conducted during an entire water year



may necessitate the consideration of additional sources or perhaps



deletion of some sources Initially considered.  Until such a time these



17 sources can effectively serve as a first phase of priority In a



program of drainage source abatement.



     Hie following is a more detailed description of the IT principal



sources mentioned above.  A listing of these sources is shown in



Table 7>  The locations of these sources are shown in Figure 5.  None



of the mines listed as principal sources were active} however, there were



four drainage sources from the large mine waste dump at Brownstown



which was associated with an active drift mine.  At the time of the mine



inventory an acid load exceeding 3;300 Ib/day was discharged from the



active David Mine of Canterbury Coal Company.  Due to the installation



of treatment facilities and the plans to further upgrade their facilities,



this mine is not considered as a major pollution source in the study



area.





                          PRINCIPAL SOURCES





Mine Ho. 6ok





     This mine is located adjacent to the gravel road which runs along



Big Run.  Facing upstream the discharge point  is located on the  left



side below the road bed almost at stream level.  A slight hillside



depression along the left side of the road may indicate the possible
                              58

-------
presence of the old drift opening.  A negligible amount of mine water




seepage was present at the base of the depression.  The measured ef-



fluent was 32^ gpm which carried an acid load of 1,750 Ib/day.






Mine No. 605





     The 675 gpm discharge from Mine No. 605 flows from what remains



of an old drift opening or from a drainway for a mine located else-



where in the general area.  The discharge has eroded a deep gully in



the surrounding hillside.  A network of culverts which once contained



the mine effluent have been completely destroyed.  Numerous subsidence



areas were also noted along the hillside directly behind the discharge



point.  There were no refuse areas, mine buildings, loading facilities,



or any other features generally associated with a mine site remaining



at this location.  The acid load discharged to Big Run was 3,^3 Ib/day.






Mine No. 6U6






     This mine site is located in the headwaters area of Blacklegs



Creek on an unnamed tributary.  A borehole discharge at this point



contributed an alkaline effluent of 1,008 gpm to the receiving tribu-



tary.  Although alkaline in nature (276 mg/l), this effluent is grossly



discolored and, as a result, several miles of downstream Blacklegs



Creek are similarly discolored.  The alkaline load was 3,330 Ib/day.



There are very limited indications of mining activity in this area



of the Blacklets Creek watershed.   As a result, this borehole may drain



abandoned workings located outside the watershed boundary, possibly from  the
                             59

-------




























CO
41
•H
(-1
rt
3
43
i-l

CO 4J
V
U VJ
B §
O *H
ro e
O *T3
00 C
cfl nl
c
f"* *H B
rt 4)
3U 4J
•O C9
M
<• 0) C
H C i-l
•H rt
B E
1— 1 -
rt ^
pf Q)
•H >
s s
•H
M CO
cu rt
4J
V
c
•r-l
E
•H
0)
•H






























E
rt
0)
VJ
4J
CO
w
C
1-1
- (
(U
U
a?




rt
•O
^•^
*J I—*
^_l
*o
•H

•^
6j
"






(U E
O U U
•H C^
4-1 « in
•H U O
CO 3 B
(X-tf O
co d P
0 U
U1



"o


§1
rH 01










 CO
CM r^ O
ro vD O
r-l

^^
(U
1— 1
o
f*.
(U
0

V™ X

4) cu 41
C C C
•H i-l -i-l
S 2 SS

U U 4J
14^ U-i IM
•H 1-1 rt
14 Jj r*.
Q Q co









 *£>
0 0 -*
\o >*o *^

c -a c
» o (2
U-l
60 "-1
•H O
« 3

O O
4J 1 '

^\ r*%
Jj M
oj rt
4J 4J
3 3
43 43
•H C C -H
**! $-1 3 3 M
"J 1^. r-l ON
r-l CO i-1







0000
o o o o
*£> m o in
*-4 co in co






CM CO V0 *^
CO CM CM CM


O *-O \D O
i-l CO r-l CO
CO






jg
Q) (D
C C

s s

c c
a) a» o o
C C -H -H
•r( -H 4J 4J
S S rt rt
e C
4J O..H 1H
 ^-i ^j
 ^ ^ ^ ^
^J >rj *H *H *H *H *H
a « o$ a c^ oi otf

CO CO (A 03 CO 0) CO

3 41 01 4) 41 41 41 m
e«ccccecccc
tJOd(iBBEBEEE

rtCCcococococowco
CQO.fi.^^^^WWW

c? C5 c^5 r*^ in ro co co vo r^** ^^
o^ o^ oo ^j r**> *^ c^j I*"* *~^ vo ^o
o) CM in i— t *i0 QO '"' **o
1—4 ^-




cjmoooooooo
ooooomoooo
cMvocor^>*r>-Or-4in\o
CM r-iin 
•H .H C C -H C 1-1 -H vH C
JJ 4-1 -H 'H CU -H CU PJ PM -r-l
rt rt 5S S S S
C C (U 4) 01 4)
•H-H4J4JW4JCOWC04-J
4343t*-'lM 34-1 3 3 34-1

0
C
•r-l
B

rt


0)
42
4J

C
•H
4J
t3
0)
4J
rt
8
r-4

8
•H

•a
g
a
00
4)

C
3

•O
n
rt

y
rt
4-1
V)
3
to
II

(U
c
•H
E
C
o
•H
4J
rt
C

45
E
0
O
*





































































j^
4J
•H
c

r-l
rt
^
i— i
rt

0)
(1)
4J
O
c
0)
a

•it
60

-------
  LEGEND
ABANDONED GAS  WEU.
UNDCRGROUND MINE
SAMPLING POINT  LOCATION
MINE REFUSE
STRIP MINE

-------
Mclntyre area.



     During the reinvest!gation of Blacklegs Creek (1971) this efflu-



ent was again sampled; however, no flow measurement was obtained.  At



the second sampling, the effluent from Mine No. 646 exhibited a net




alkalinity of 157 mg/1 (acidity 68 mg/l).






Mine No. 5207





     Mine No. 5207 was not located during the initial survey in 1966.



It was found and sampled for the first time in 1971.  It was not



determined if this site represents a mine opening or a breakout



point from an underground mine located elsewhere in the general area.



The 310 gpm effluent carried an acid load of I,6l8 Ib/day.  This ef-



fluent imparts noticeable discoloration to Big Run in the area up-



stream of Mine No. 604.






Mine No. 553^




     This mine was located near the headwaters of Wolford Run.  The



36 gpm effluent represents cumulative seepage collected several



hundred yards below a strip mined area.  There were several drift



openings in the strip mine highwall but they were dry.  The acid



load carried by the discharge was 76l Ib/day.






Mine No. 5535




     The source of this 16 gpm discharge was a drift mine which has



been intersected by a surface mine.  There were at least three or



four additional openings within this small disturbed area, but



they were dry.
                             63

-------
This discharge was located In Wolford Run.  The acid load vas 595



Ib/day.






Mine No. 5536





     At this mine site a 30 gpm effluent was collected below an area



which has been mined by both surface and underground methods.  The



strip mine area is several hundred yards in length and at least three



drift openings were located in the highwall.  The drift openings were



dry; however, there was considerable seepage about the base of the spoil



piles.  The cumulative seepage from this area is collected in a pond



which then discharges to an unnamed tributary of Wolford Run.  The



acid load was 698 Ib/day.





Mine No.
     This mine is located immediately below the Beaver Run Reservoir.



The 110 gpm discharge emanates from the base of a strip mine highwall



at a point about 50 yards from a drift mine opening.  The acid load



carried by the effluent was 2,90^ Ib/day.  A second effluent was



located on the opposite side of the same drift opening.  The acid load



of this 10 gpm discharge (Mine Ho. 55^7) was 263 Ib/day.





Mine lo. 5608





     This mine was located near the mouth of Pine Run.  A strip mine



extends several hundred yards along one bank of the tributary.  It



appears that this operation has completely destroyed or covered the

-------
portal to an underground nine operation.  In addition, numerous inter-



sections with the underground mine void were created.  Continuous



seepage was observed along the length of the strip mine as veil as



three major discharge points.  Mine No. 3608 represents the major



discharge point.  The acid load vas 909 Ib/day.  The other tvo dis-



charges contributed an additional acid load of 179 Ib/day.





Mine No. 5611





    The discharge point of this mine vas also located on Pine Run.



However, it vas on the opposite bank of the tributary from the discharges



described above.  The 180 gpm effluent emerged via pipe from the base



of the hillside and carried an acid load of 2,808 Ib/day.  There vere



no obvious indications of mining on this bank of Pine Run.  However,



the pipe may serve as a drainvay to a mine located elsevhere.





Mine Ho. 5883





     This abandoned drift mine vas located within the Brovnstovn area



mining complex along the bank of the Kiskimlnetas River.  Mine No.



5883 vas one of the numerous openings in this immediate area.  An



80 gpm effluent vas measured at the partially open drift mouth. The



acid load vas 5,U?2 Ib/day.





Site No.'s $888, 3890, 5891, and 5892
     The discharges from these four sites are not directly attributable



   a mine site location but rather they result from the large mine

-------
refuse dump associated vith the Brownstown mining complex.  The hilltop



refuse site covers a number of acres and at the time of survey was in



use by the Leechburg Mining Company.  The combined acid load from the



four measureable discharge points was 21,881 Ib/day.  The discharge from



No. 5890 had an acidity concentration of 3^*000 rag/1.  Many trees and



considerable vegetation has been destroyed along the downslope side of



the refuse dump.  This has resulted from many seepage areas along the



edge of the pile.  It is areas such as these which prohibit the accurate



determination of the total pollutional load which this area contributed



to the Kiskiminetas River.





Mine No. 5889





     This is another abandoned and caved mine opening in the Brownstown



area complex.  This old opening may have been a fanway or drainway to



one of the numerous mines in the immediate area.  The discharge was



located about 60 vertical feet above the river.  From the point of



discharge the effluent spreads over a wide area destroying all vege-



tation before it finally enters the river.  The acid load was 6,^32 Ib/day.





Mine No. $898





     This mine is located along the bank of the Kiskiminetas River



about 0.7 miles above the mouth of the river.  At least two caved



openings to the mine were located.  The 10 gpm discharge  Is about 60



vertical feet above the river.  In addition to the major  discharge point



there are also several seepage areas around the vicinity  of the old



openings.  The acid load was 672 Ib/day.
                              66

-------
   IOYALHANNA CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
          67

-------
                     LOYALHANNA CREEK




                  SUMMARY AHB OOMCLUSION3






1.  Loyalhanna Creek drains an area of 300 square miles in



Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.   Coal mine operations were



absent in several areas of the watershed, particularly in the




headwaters area.






2.  Main stem Loyalhanna Creek and several tributaries to




Loyalhanna Creek are seriously polluted by coal mine drainage.



The effects upon stream water quality are most apparent below



the community of Latrobe.






3.  A total of 52 discharging sources and approximately 900



acres of surface mined area were investigated in the Loyalhanna



Creek watershed.  Discharges from the coal mine sources ranged




from one to 5,097 gpm and totalled 16.1 million gallons per day



(mgd).  The total net acid load discharged by the 52 sources was



65,1*07 Ib/day.





k.  At the time of survey, active operations were limited to



one surface and one small underground mine.  There was no dis-



charge from either mine.  Abandoned underground mines were the



major source of pollution in the watershed, contributing over



90 percent of the total net acid load.
                             68

-------
5.  A total of 15 principal sources of mine drainage discharge



were located in the study area.  These sources discharged a total



acid load of 62,1*07 Ib/day, about 96 percent of the acid load



discharged by all 52 sources inventoried during the survey.  In



turn, three of the principal sources, Ho.'s 5177> 5356, and 536*1



discharged a combined acid load of nearly 25 tons per day.
                             69

-------
                     DESCRIPTION OF AREA






     The headwater! of Loyalhanna Creek arise near the community  of




Stahlstown.  From this point, the stream flows generally north toward



LLgonier.  Laughlintown Run and Linn  Ron are two major headwater



tributaries of Loyalhanna Creek.  Both of these tributaries drain



the mountainous areas of Laurel Hill.



     Mill Creek is another major tributary which joins Loyalhanna



Creek at Ligonier.  From this point,  Loyalhanna Creek flows north-



west to the community of Latrobe and  from there to its confluence



with the Conemaugh River at Saltsburg.  The confluence of Loyalhanna



Creek and the Conemaugh River forms the Kiskiminetas River.  Loyalhanna



Creek drains an area of 300 square miles and the Conemaugh River  drains



an area of 1,376 square miles.






                    STREAM WATER QOMJTY



     At the time of the study, Loyalhanna Creek was unaffected by



mine drainage above the confluence of Mill Creek in the community



of Ligonier.  There were no coal mine operations inventoried on



any of the headwater tributaries above Ligonier.



     The first area of coal mining activity in the watershed oc-



curred on Mill Creek.  Although there were numerous discharging



mine sites located on tributaries to  Mill Creek, the effects upon



the water quality of main stem Mill Creek were moderate.  There



were no major sources of mine drainage pollution located in the



area of the watershed between Ligonier and the downstream community



of Latrobe.
                            70

-------
     In the community of Latrobe, Loyalhanna Creek received two




massive discharges from abandoned mines.  In combination, these



two effluents completely deplete the in-stream alkalinity and



Loyalhanna Creek remains grossly polluted over its entire remain-



ing downstream length.  A third such discharge was located on



Crabtree Creek which drains to the headwaters of Loyalhanna Reservoir.




     During the course of the field study (1968) several stream



locations were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 8).  These




stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine



drainage.  A summary of this stream data is presented in Table 9.



The locations of these sampling points are shown in Figure 6.



     With the exception of Station No. 5622, all stream sampling



points are located below (downstream) major mine drainage inflow.



Station No. 5622, USGS gage at Kingston, was located above (upstream)



all major sources of mine drainage.  As shown in Table 9, the acidity



concentration exceeded the alkalinity concentration on two of the



three sampling dates.  However, the pH of the stream at this point



remained above 8.0.  Mine drainage discharges totalling about 1500



Ib/day were discharged to watershed streams above Kingston.  As



mentioned, most of this acid load was discharged to Mill Creek.



Although this tributary adds acidity to Loyalhanna Creek, the



stream is apparently well buffered and assimilates the acidity



without lowering the pH of the stream.
                             71

-------
                                      TABLE 8

                       Stream water quality sampling stations
                                  Loyalhanna Creek
Station
  No.
              Sampling Period
     Stream
      Location
5623

562U

5^30

5292

5616
             Oct. Hoc,  Dec,  1968

             Oct, Noc,  Dec,  1968

             Oct, Nov,  Dec,  1968

             Nov, Dec,  1968

             July, Oct, Nov, 1968

             Oct, Nov,  Dec,  1968
Loyalhanna Creek

Monastery Run

Saxmans Run

Crabtree Creek

Loyalhanna Creek

Getty Run
USGS gage @ Kingston

Near mouth

Near mouth

Near mouth

USGS gage below reservoir

Near mouth
                                      72

-------
     During the earlier 1966 stream survey, an additional stream




sampling point (Ho. 572) was located on Loyalhanna Creek above



Ligonier.  This station was located above all mine drainage inflow.



On each of the six samplings at this station, Loyalhanna Creek



carried a net alkalinity.  However, acidity was present on each



sampling occasion.  The acidity concentration ranged from 5 ng/1



to 11 mg/1 while the alkalinity concentration ranged from 12 mg/1



to 39 mg/1 (Appendix A).  This background water quality sampling



location indicates that, although the stream was consistently al-



kaline, an appreciable amount of natural acidity was carried by



Loyalhanna Creek in the headwaters of the watershed.  This natural




in-stream acidity, in combination with the acid load discharged to



Loyalhanna Creek by Mill Creek  nay, in part, account for the con-



ditions found at the Kingston sampling point.



     Miller Run is a small tributary which enters Loyalhanna Creek



at Kingston*  The mouth of Miller Run is approximately 123 feet



upstream of the gage house on the same bank of the Creek.  Several



dry mines and one discharging mine were located on Miller Run.   The



sampling point location at Kingston was inadvertently located at the



USGS gage.  The flow reading was obtained from the gage house and



the sample collected along the bank of the stream.  Ideally, the



sample point should have been above the mouth of Miller Run.  The



samples, as collected only a little more than 100 feet below the



mouth of Miller Run, may not have accurately represented the water



quality of Loyalhanna Creek at this point.
                            73

-------
a
n
I
o
   I
   g

   S
   n
   f+
   g
   o.


   e


   H-
   O
VI
: : ON
ON
H H M
ro H o
ro ui
e-o o
ON ON ON
00 CD CO
VO H
j VO ~J
Ul ON M
e- c- o
UJ UJ
• VI H
OO
H ro
ONH ro
VI O O
ooo
ro -f vi
o o tr-
>JI O O
ro H
O VO Ul
vi £- H
-• ro ro
OVO 0
*O H CO
f f UJ
-* VI &•
-) o -i
O H ON
1 H
Ul 1 H
3 1 O
1
UJ 1
O 1 VO
VI 1 ON
e- i co
— i fr VO
—i o ro
C-vo *-
H
Co vo — q
-j ON 00
ro u> o
ro vo H

ro
\3 ro ON
P Ul ON
— ] IV) VO-
ro vi ON
CO f- VI
3 *$
$
J O — 1
H UJ H
U) O H
O CO CD
-1 O
ro -i vo
300
A! UJ uj
»-• u) ro
M M ro
O UJ H
838
CrO O
H CD
H U) VI
Sro Co
ONCO o
U) U) f
O J?" O
«-o o
£$r
>N— ) \J\
\J\ ON-
ON ON
o
£ i\j -5
Ol O XJ1
vjl f\) OJ
• <* to
esr
O CO H
VI
o
^O ON VI
ro vi o
-* "
O VI VI
*r- ON— 1
>o ro o
Ul f VI'
-I ONro
ro
UJ VI
H Ul VI
U> Ul K-
H I-1 -l
ro
10 UJ
ONIO Q
-1 ONVS
CO Go ON
: rc?-
°
O H H
H M
U) VO VI
ON ON ON
00 OB CO
ON VO VI
M ro H
CO — 1 Ul
VI ON f
CO VO C*N
VO VO VI
VI VI O
ooo
ro H ro
vi ro u>
OHO
-. (_. H
vi VH
O VI -^
ro o co
UJ Ul C"
vi ro -I
VI O ON
ro u> ro
ON VI VO
Al VI Ul
e--i ui
I
H 1 CO
§1 CD
I 0
1
1 VI
'*- I "ro
ro I *r
H 1 -)
-J f
O -> CO
000 bo
VI VI VI
H u> ro
O H CD
Ul -1 NO
O H UJ
ro coo

H O Co
vn O v/i
trf 1
H 00 1
\
t 3 ON
*"
O M O
I-1 ro
yj Co er
ON ON ON
00 00 00
H ro H
ONUJ H
CDCOH
O N/l O
tn vi ^-
J>" ON VI
n ro o
o vi o
AI ro uj
ONON4^
«> VI VI
vi vi ro
o *-vo
ro ro 4=-
3 O ON
J>* ON VI
Al ON ^~
00 VO H
VI 1 -1
§1 ON
I VI
1
j ' H
81 G
*r | O
^/1 f OO
ONO -1
O O VO
H t-> H
_i H I-.
O VI H
*-U)-l
ro ro vi

ffftg
H M
O OOVI
o e--t
m
= =ON
UJ
H H H
OHO
UJ H UJ
~^vo H
ON ON ON
& 00 CD
ro *•
UJ H UJ
ONro -J
OOONH
-1-1-1
IN) vi ro
ONONfO
vi ro-i
O VI VI
1
M ui vo
U> ON-1
1
Al CDUI
co ro ro
H H ro
*--! Ul
ONH o
IT OOH
-• V"o
00 ONUJ
H i *•
— J 1 UJ
O I vn
OO 1 VO
U) 1 U)
J ) ^
H
•Ul OJ *-
OJ CTN ON

gSs?
H H C-
-1 O O

OOO 00
H ro o
f H CO
sl.
«*s
a
H H H
ro !-• o
^Kn
DCDCD
31^*-
558
CO 00 CD
ui o ro
ro ro f
o cp o
5 So
ro i H
*- CO VI
ro I
-• U)
-i ro -i
UJ CD OO
vn — i -i
c-ro vi
Bto u>
vo ON oo
OOVI CO
ho vo oo
So1?
Ul H
J Ul tr
VI O f
ro CD-I
ooo
CD ON ON

-i ro
ro -4 ui
vi ro M
0 0
Ul O H

ro
\J O VI
H H O
ON VI *C
fo SM
                                            .f
                                            ^^

                                              H
                                             ^
                                             !l
                                                    •9
                                                    3

                                                   |l


                                                   H
                                                   > n

                                                   I **
                                                   » |0

                                                   ?E
                                                   a H-
                                                   * <+
                                                   *•«•*


                                                    R
                                                    P

-------
                             I KISKIHINCT4S
                                     Rivet

                                % &ALTS1URO
                                                                                                                                                        VICINITY  MAP
         FIGURE  6
    LOYALHANNA  CREEK

WATE^ QJAI.ITY  SAMPLING  LOCATIONS

-------
                     SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE






     Approximately 165 mining sites and an estimated 900 acres of



surface mined area were investigated in this study.  Samples for



chemical analysis were collected from 52 sources discharging at the



time of the survey.  The total effluent volume was 11,165 gpm or 16.1



million gallons per day (mgd).   The total net acid load discharged



to Loyalhanna Creek and its tributaries was 65,^07  Ib/day.



     A description of the mine drainage source follows.  All mine site



locations inventoried in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed are shown



in Figure 7-






Mill Creek






     The first upstream area of coal mine operations in the Loyalhanna



Creek watershed were located on Hannas Run, a tributary to Mill Creek.



Mill Creek drains an area of 21 square miles.  However, the mine operations



were limited to the portion of the drainage area around the community



of Wilpen.



     A number of surface and underground mines were located on Hannas



Run.  Several of the old underground mine operations were associated



with the production of coke.  Banks of abandoned and deteriorating



bee-hive coke ovens remain at several of the old underground mine sites.



Most of the surface mines were quite limited in size and were restricted



to hill top locations.



     Mine No.1s 5266 and 5267 were located on an unnamed tributary to



Hannas Run west of Wilpen.  Both were small underground mines and probably
                            76

-------
quite limited In the extent of development.  The combined acid load



from these mines was 156 It/day.  Northeast of these two mines a



series of six drift mines were located on another unnamed tributary



to Hannas Run.  The total net acid load discharged by these mines



was k2k Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5269, 5270, 5271, 527^, and 5275).



Several underground mine openings appear to have been destroyed or



covered by a surface mine at Wilpen. At least two underground openings



were located within the disturbed area.  A l8o gpm effluent was measured



at Mine Ho. 5265.  The second mine opening was dry.



     The last sources of mine drajbage to enter Mill Creek were located



on an unnamed tributary west of Oak Grove.  A total acid load of 7^8



Ib/day was discharged to this tributary from three sources.  Mine No. 5264



was an old drift opening discharging at the rate of 40 gpm.  The acid



load was 259 Ib/day.  There are several surface mines located near



the headwaters of this tributary.  There were no discharges draining



directly to the tributary; however, these mines were affecting the



water quality of this small stream.  Below the disturbed area an acid



load of 428 Ib/day was carried by the tributary.





Loyalhanna Creek, Llgonler to Latrobe





     Clark Hollow was the first downstream area affected by mine drainage



in this portion of the watershed.  A total of nine drift mine openings



were located along Clark Hollow.  At the time of the survey a small



one-man drift mine was active in this area.  The mine was dry.  Several



hundred yards below this operation a 30 gpm effluent from one of the



old drift openings was located.  This discharge carried an acid load



of 108 Ib/day.





                            77

-------
     Two slumped drift mine openings were located south of Route 30



and adjacent (west side) to Idlewild Amusement Bark.   What appears



to be a mine seal was located at the base of one of these slumped



openings.  A 12 gpm effluent was measured at the seal.  The drain-



age formed a small impoundment and then overflowed to Loyalhanna



Creek.  The acid load from this mine (No. 5072) was 127 Ib/day.



     Miller Run enters Loyalhanna Creek just upstream of the USGS



gaging station at Kingston.  A total of ten mine openings were



located within this 3*6 square mile drainage area. Mine Ho. 5073



contributed an acid load of 27 Ib/day.  All other mine sites were dry.





Hinemile Run





     Ninemile Run drains an area of 21 square miles south of



Latrobe.  The tributary enters Loyalhanna Creek just  north of the



intersection of Routes 30 and 982.



     Abandoned underground mine operations were located near the



communities of Whitney, Hostetter, and Baggaley.  The location of



the mine openings have been destroyed or filled.  The only source



of mine drainage located in this area was on a small  unnamed trib-



utary which joins Hinemile Run at Baggaley.  The source of the



drainage was a large refuse pile adjacent to the stream.  Seepage



from this pile had grossly degraded the water quality of the trib-



utary.  The acid load carried by the stream below the refuse area



was 1,928 Ib/day (Ho. 5351).
                             78

-------
     There were no additional drainage sources located on Ninemile



Run during the survey.






Monastery Run - Fourmile Run




     There were no discharging sites located on Monastery Run.



However, what appeared to be an old entry to the St.  Vincent mine



was located along the bank of Monastery Run.  The only evidence



which remains at the site is a mine refuse pile.



     Fourmile Run, a tributary to Monastery Run, was  seriously



polluted as a result of mine discharges.  One drift mine and



several surface mines were located near the headwaters of the



stream; however, these mines were dry.  In the downstream area,



above St. Vincent Lake, a series of mine drainage sources were



located adjacent to the tributary.  A 22 gpm effluent was located



near an old bridge crossing above the lake.  The effluent (No.  5359)



was discharged to the tributary by a 6 inch pipe.  The acid load was



2U? Ib/day.  Above this point, a swampy area existed  along both banks



of Fourmile Run.  Within this area, three additional  mine discharges



were located.  These discharges were artesian in character and con-



tributed considerable mine drainage acidity to the tributary.   The



total acid load from these sources (No.'s 5260, 526l  and 5262) was



1,8U2 Ib/day.  The iron load from these sources was ?UO Ib/day.



Similar sites were located adjacent to the tributary; however,  these



sites were situated almost at stream level and therefore not readily



measurable.
                             79

-------
Loyalhanna Creek - Latrobe Area





     One of the three largest sources of mine drainage discharge in




the Loyalhanna Creek watershed was located along the bank of the



main stem just below the confluence of Monastery Run.  A horizontal



pipe, several feet above stream level, discharged an effluent of



1,990 gpm to Loyalhanna Creek.  This was discharge No. 536U.   Due



to the velocity of the discharge and the somewhat limited capacity



of the pipe, an estimated 50-100 gpm of additional drainage was



forced through the strata surrounding the pipe.



     A second effluent was located a few feet downstream of



No. 536U.  The second effluent discharged from a vertical pipe



emerging from the stream bed in the middle of Loyalhannn Creek.



The discharge from this pipe was 62 gpm (No. 5363).



     The discharges from No.'s 5363 and 536U were somewhat peculiar



in that, upon emergence from underground, the effluents were quite



clear and exhibited a pH of 7.U.  Downstream of the discharge point,



Loyalhanna Creek became grossly discolored and the pH of the stream



began to drop.  This apparently resulted from downstream hydrolysis



of the mine effluents.  The result of this hydrolysis was the pro-



duction of the in-stream acidity and the precipitation of iron com-



pounds along the banks and on the stream bottom.



     The effluents collected at the two points indicated that a



total acid load of 17,860 Ib/day was discharged to Loyelhanna Creek.



The major part of this load, 17,^32 Ib/day, was from No. 536U.  The
                             80

-------
iron load carried by this discharge was over 8,200 Ib/day.



     The discharges from No.'s 53&3 and 536U are believed to result



from the St. Vincent Mine.  A local resident reported that the hori-



zontal pipe (No. 536*0 was installed in an attempt to drain as much



of the water from the old mine as possible.  Before installation of



this drainway, much of the surrounding area was reported as having



been swampy and unstable similar to the situation found above



St. Vincent Lake.



     This drainway may also serve as a common discharge point for



mines interconnected with the St. Vincent Mine.  This could include



the mines in the Baggaley, Hostetter, and Whitney areas.  It may



even include mines outside the Loyalhanna Creek drainage area such



as the mine at Marguerite.  This abandoned mine is located near



the headwaters of Sewickley Creek which drains to the Monongahela



River.



     Several additional boreholes were located in the same general



area as the discharges described above.  A series of three boreholes



were located about Q.k mile upstream of discharge No. 536U.  These



boreholes were located beside a small oxbow lake adjacent to Loyal-



hanna Creek.  The holes were dry but a local resident reported that



they do drain after periods of heavy rainfall.





Saxman Run



     The headwaters of this tributary rise near the small community



of West Derry, and were immediately degraded by mine drainage.  Three
                            81

-------
shaft mines and one drift mine were located in this area.  A  70 gpm




discharge was found at Mine No. 5071*.   A portion of this drainage



emerges from a pipe at the shaft site and the remaining part  of the



discharge emerges from a structure similar to a spring house  adjacent



to an occupied house on the opposite side of the road.  The acid load



was 183 Ib/day.  Mine No. 5075 contributed an additional discharge of



15 gpm which carried an acid load of 35 Ib/day.  This was also a



shaft mine and similar to the other two in the area, which had re-




cently been filled.



     Two additional shaft mines and one drift mine were located near



the community of Bradenville; however, these mines were dry.



     A 2,269 gpm discharge from Mine No. 5177 was located near the



mouth of Saxman Run.  The original mine opening has been destroyed



by highway construction.  During the construction, a culvert  was



placed under the road bed and the mine discharge drains under the



highway via this culvert to Saxman Run.  The acid load contributed



by this discharge was 12,389 Ib/day.  This was the second of  the



three major discharges located in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.



As with the St. Vincent drainway, the discharge from this mine is



reportedly supplied by a series of interconnected underground mines.






Union Run






     Large slope and shaft mines were located on the two headwater



tributaries of Union Run near the communities of Peanut and Atlantic.



The mines did not have discharges at these points; however,  seepage
                              82

-------
was contributed to the streams from the refuse piles associated



with the old mines.  Further downstream, additional underground



and several surface mines were located along Union Run.  The



total acid load from three discharging sites (Nine No.'s 5301,



3302, and 5303) was 229 Ib/day.  These three discharges in combina-



tion with the immeasurable seepage areas throughout the drainage



area are sufficient to completely degrade the water quality of



Union Run over its entire length.  At its mouth, Union Run had a



pH of 3.5 and a conductivity of 1,250.



     It appears likely that the discharge point on Saxman Run (Ho. 5177)



may also drain some of the larger mines in the Union Run drainage area.





Loyalhanna Creek, main stem and minor tributaries



     Only minor amounts of mine drainage were discharged to Loyalhanna



Creek below Union Run and the next major downstream tributary, Crab-



tree Creek.



     One surface mine and one underground mine were the only sources



located on the east bank of Loyalhanna Creek.  Two slumped drift



mine openings were located below the Keystone Lake dam.  The com-



bined acid load from these openings was 280 Ib/day.  The surface



mine was dry.



     Seven surface mines and four drift mine openings were located



along the west bank of Loyalhanna Creek.  Only two of these mine



sites were discharging.  An acid load of 3 Ib/day was discharged



by Mine Ho. 5358 and Mine No. 5357 contributed an acid load of



121 Ib/day.

-------
Crabtree Creek



     Crabtree Creek has been extensively mined in all portions of its



19 square mile drainage area.  Several of the underground operations



appear to have been quite extensive and were often associated with



coke production.



     The first major mine site in the Crabtree Creek drainage area



was located in the community of Forbes Road.  The nine was apparently



a shaft or slope which has been filled or covered.  The mine build-



ings are currently used by a small local industry.  Mine refuse dumps



are located along both banks of Crabtree Creek.



     The next major downstream mine site on Brabtree Creek was loca-



ted at Hannastown.  This mine also had a slope or shaft opening



which has been filled or covered.  A very large refuse pile is lo-



cated along the north bank of Crabtree Creek and contributed con-



siderable seepage to the stream.  Below this refuse pile, an acid



load of 898 Ib/day was carried by Crabtree Creek (Sta. Ho. 5355).



     A series of surface and underground mines were located on



Little Crabtree Creek.  Mine Mo. 535^ was the only mine on this



tributary which contributed drainage during the study.  The acid



load from this combination surface and underground mine was 100 Ib/day.



     The largest single source of mine drainage in the loyalhanna



Creek watershed was located about 0.5 mile below the confluence of



Little Crabtree Creek and Crabtree Creek.  This 5,097 gpm discharge



was from the Crabtree Mine (Mine No. 5356).  However, this discharge



point also drains other mines in the surrounding area which are

-------
interconnected with the Crabtree Mine.  The acid load discharged to



Crabtree Creek by this single source was 19,572 Ib/day.



     Stream sampling conducted near the mouth of Crabtree Creek



coincident with the mine drainage survey showed that this stream



discharged an average acid load exceeding 15,000 Ib/day to Loyal-



hanna Creek (Table 9).





Loyalhanna Creek, Hew Alexandria Area





     Approximately 20 surface mines and several abandoned under-



ground mines were located in this general area.  The only major



underground site was the slope or shaft mine at Shieldsburg.



There was no direct discharge from the mine; however, the large



refuse pile contributed considerable seepage to the unnamed tribu-



tary which drains this area.  The remaining mines in the area were



either dry or contributed only insignificant amounts of mine drain-



age acidity to the tributaries draining the area.



     A total of seven underground mines and two surface mines were



located along the banks of Loyalhanna Creek Just below the Loyal-



hanna Reservoir dam.  Hone of these mines contributed any mine



drainage discharge.





Getty Run





     Getty Run was the last downstream tributary affected by mine



drainage before the confluence of Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh



River at Saltsburg.  The stream is totally degraded over its entire



length as a result of mine drainage.  A total of 12 discharges with



a combined acid load of 8,091 Ib/day were inventoried on this tributary.
                            85

-------
     Mine Ho. 5170 discharged the major part of the total acid



load.  This mine was located near the headwaters of the tributary



and discharged at the rate of 2kO gpm.  The acid load was U,060 Ib/day.



A second significant acid load was discharged by Mine Ho. 5171.  The



opening was located about 30 feet above stream level and discharged



U5 gpm.  The opening may represent a drainway or airway for one of



the numerous mines in this area.  The acid load discharged by Mine



Ho. 5171 was 9*0 Ib/day.  Mine Ho.'s 5173 and 5176 discharged acid



loads of 936 Ib/day and Ul7 Ib/day, respectively, to small unnamed



tributaries of Getty Run.  These mine discharges were located in



areas associated with both surface and underground mine operations.



Mine Ho.'s 5163 and 516U represent the last two major discharge



points on Getty Run.  These mines were located on an unnamed tribu-



tary to Getty Run.  The mines were hillside drifts located directly



across from each other on opposite banks of the small tributary.



The acid loads from Mine Ho.'s 5163 and 5164 were 688 Ib/day and



586 Ib/day, respectively.



     At the time of the source investigation, a rather large drift



mine operation near the mouth of Getty Run had recently been closed.



The tipple was being disassembled at the time.  This mine did not



contribute any direct discharge.  However, severe leaching occurred



at the base of the refuse pile associated with the mine.  Seepage



areas were common throughout all portions of the Getty Run drain-



age area.  This was particularly evident below the surface mined



areas.

-------
      Stream sampling near the mouth of Getty Run,  coincident with



 the source inventory, indicated that this tributary discharged an



 average acid load of about 15,000 Ib/day to Loyalhanna Creek




 (Table 9).



      A total of 52 discharging sources and approximately 900 acres of



 surface mined area were investigated during this study.  Table 10




 presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow  and total loading



(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams




 in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.  Table 11  presents a summary of



 flow volumes and chemical loading by source type for the 52 dis-



 charging sources inventoried during the study.






                      roLLUTIOH ABATEMENT



      As shown in Table 11 , shaft mines were the principal pollution




 sources in the study area.  The total acid load discharged from shaft



 or slope mine sources was 51,88l Ib/day.  Drift mines were the sec-



 ondary major source type and discharged an acid load of 9>08U Ib/day.



 In addition, significant acid loads were discharged by one surface



 mine and two mine refuse areas.



      Including all source types, a total of 15  principal sources of



 mine drainage discharge were located in the Loyalhanna Creek study



 area.  These sources included six shaft or slope mines, six drift



 mines, two mine refuse dumps, and one surface mine.   These sources



 discharged a total acid load of $2,U?0 Ib/day,  about 96 percent of



 the acid load discharged by all 52 sources located during the survey.

-------
VICINITY  MAP

-------



•
























q
f~i

S
CQ
M


















































g
rt
,
O
0> i-4
60
rt
C
•H
rt
•a

01 >
£4
rt ^
60X1
Cc2
'P
rt C n)
rt O TJ
O H Xl
H •-!
^^

0) x-
4-1 >
cfl cfl
vw -a
rt "V.
3 X)
00 rt
Nw

01 ^s
rt 01 >
rt a) rt
j_) £j *"^j
H h Xt
rt >-i
33 v^


•U
0) >s^»
25 4J >
•H tt
i— I *^ ^j
rt -H -v.
4J O Xl
O <| rt
H ^


0)
60

rt rt E
4J XI ft
O o bl
H 01 ^
•rH
Q
CO
VM 10
O 0
. 3
0 0
g
rt
0)

i-l
CO

60
C
•H
•H
O>
o
<2

00
m




oo
oo
vO
oo
m
<^
oo"



m
^
ON

1^
>j"



ON
*^
oo
vO
CM






00
o\
n
p^.
r- 1





"^
^O
o
«t
CM




CO


M O
01 4J
0)
I-l 01
U X)
•H

C 4J
c
rt *^3
Xl U
rt rt
^% C

CO O
CM




CM ^t
m

o oo
CO ON
vO




CO Is*
O vO
CO CO

VD




co r^
f^i \o
rt m
rt






VO CM
co r^
CM rt
•\
m






 -u
c (-1 »^
3 U rt
0) U
4-> p d)
4J 4J i-(
a) xi -u
O W 4-1

-, -H

m ON
Sis




•* CM
O CM
CM
- m o
CM  *^- ON
00 in ON
rt rt



^
1— 1(

oo co m
*< rt 00
i^ i in








oo o i~~
<(• oo oo
i-l rt CM






CO rt ON


0 0

Q)
01 fl) Oi G
Xi U Xi 3
*H O *H PC
j_i C J-<
4-1 Iff 3 U 0)
TJ i-t TJ C
s
4J
•H
 C
 01
 a)
 4J
 o

 
-------




















0)

5
CO
o
3
o
CO
>-, CD
XI CO
jj
CO O
00
C cd
•H C
•0 C
cd cd
0 X!
r-l r-l
cd
CD rS
GO O
rt H^
•H
cd

•O

(U
c

2

































E «••»
C cd
•r4 *^
B *x
3 iO
<3
<0 /->
CO >

cd C cc
4J O "O
O Jj ^
H r-l X

^

COx-v

cd n
m TJ
3 XI
C/J r-l



CO ^-s
CO >
a) cd
C T3

jj X
Cd r-
pcj **>



4J
CO £»>o
•H Cl
r-1 TJ TJ
Cd -H -V.
4J O XI
0 ^"
•*
r-l
0
ON
O
*»
vO
CM cd
b
n)
"S
«*>, C
ON .H
*> B
O CO
^ §
CO

co
CO 4J
m
00 C
** *H
CM fi
O JJ
•-I -H
£$
-d
co
4J
S
fx, O
0 r-4

CO
m c
vO -1-4
3

T3
C
§
)_)
m oo
vO I-i
r-4 CD
TJ
•-< c
r-l 3

•a
c
cd
(U
o
cd
CM 4-1
m n
3
03
CO
C
•H
(3

c
0
. -H
U
cd
C
•H
X)
>— 1 O
<: u
t*
H *

-------
     In the Loyalhanna Creek watershed, all site* which contributed



an acid load in excess of 1*00 Ib/day are considered as principal



sources.



     A designed program of pollution abatement in the Loyalhanna



Creek must give primary consideration to Mine No.'s 5177, 5356,



and 536U.  These three mines contributed the massive acid discharges



on Saxman Run, Crabtree Creek, and main stem Loyalhanna Creek.  Al-



though the other source types listed above discharged significant



acid loads, abatement of these sources without previous or concurrent



abatement of the three largest discharges, would result in only an



insignificant water quality improvement within the watershed*  Mine



No.'s 5177, 5356 and 536^ discharged a combined acid load of nearly



25 tons per day.  The remaining 12 principal source sites discharged



an acid load of 6.5 tons per day.  By comparison, the acid load dis-



charged by Mine Ho. 5177, the smallest of the three major sources



(12,389 Ib/day), closely approximated the combined acid load of the



other 12 sites (13,077 Ib/day).



     It is necessary to consider the other 12 sources sites in a



complete program of drainage abatement.  Failure to consider these



sources would result in the discharge of significant acid loads to



watershed streams even after abatement of the three major source



sites.  This is of particular importance on Getty Run.  Without



abatement of the principal sources on this small tributary, sig-



nificant amounts of acid drainage would be discharged to Loyalhanna
                             93

-------
Creek.  During the mine drainage survey, Getty Run (Sta.  Ho.  5616)



discharged an average acid load of about 15,000 Ib/day to Loyalhanna



Creek.



     The abatement of mine drainage is often a difficult  task,  ir-



respective of the source type responsible for the discharge.   In



addition to the problems associated with the sealing of underground



drift mines and the reclamation of surface mines and gob  pile areas,



a mine drainage remedial program in this watershed is faced with the



difficult problem of abating large volumes of mine drainage emanat-



ing from interconnected shaft or slope mine complexes. This  parti-



cular problem is represented by the discharges associated with



Mine Ho.'s 5177, 5363 and 536U.



     It is beyond the scope of this initial mine drainage survey



to accurately assess the magnitude of the abatement problem which



these mines represent.  However, based on the initial study,  it is



apparent that until such a time when drainage control can be  suc-



cessfully achieved at these sites, abatement at the other 12  source



sites would be of only minimal value.



     Since completion of the 1968 survey, the Commonwealth of



Pennsylvania has initiated additional engineering studies in the



Loyalhanna Creek watershed.  This study is designed to recommend



specific abatement measures for the mine sources in the watershed.



The laboratory data and mine site location naps developed during



the 1968 study and presented in this document provided the preli-



minary basis for the secondary study.  It is anticipated  that this

-------
study if 111 provide a detailed plan of abatement for mines in the



Loyalhanna Creek watershed.



     Detailed engineering studies and long term repetitive water



quality sampling of the discharge sites may necessitate the con-



sideration of additional sources or perhaps the deletion of some



sources initially considered.  However, the further development



of correlation between mine discharge characteristics and stream



water quality will not alter the primary abatement considerations



warranted by Mine Ifo. fs 5177, 5363 and 53#».



     The following is a more detailed description of the 15 prin-



cipal sources recommended for abatement.  These sources can ef-



fectively serve as a first phase or priority in a program of



drainage source abatement in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.



These sources are listed in Table 12 and the mine site locations



are shown in Figure 8.





                      FRIHCmL SOURCES





Mine No. 5177



     This mine was located near the mouth of Saxman Run adjacent



to Route 981.  The original slope opening was destroyed when



Route 981 was widened to four lanes.  During construction, a cul-



vert was placed under the new road bed and the 2,269 gpm discharge



drains under the highway via the culvert to Saxman Run.  This old



opening reportedly serves as a common drainway for a series of
                            •95

-------



























CM
r-l

W
PQ
H




































B
. cd
CU

JJ
CO
g
K
•H
(U
O
&

cd
•a
x
u
•H
t)
U

o B
r-l B
FZH W
v^





0)
C


u-t
o
a
H





cu
C •

£ 2

O
jj

XI
•H
to
4J C
•a «
.
cd JJ
n jj
C (U
£3 C5
00
oo





m
m
Os




o
o
oo
r-4







oo
CM





O











CU
C

y

14-1
1-H
to
Q





CO
sO
I— 1
m

O
JJ

XI
•H
JJ
T3
cu
n)
C
C

oo
in




m
00
0
i-i



o
0
CM
CM







SO
CM





in
,
Sjj
jj
C 0)
3 0
^
rH
^




O

co
I—I



o
0
0
co







oo
CM





m
CM










cu
•H
y

14-1
•H
to
Q





sO
f^*
I— 1
in

o
jj

X1
C 'to 
CM







0) CU
C C
•H -H
y y

14-1 -H
Cfl rJ
CO CO





r^ co
l~^ so
rH CSJ
in in


Ky» *~^
cu cu
C CU CU
3 to to
pci 0 0
CU CU (U
•H to to
B u JJ
CU XI XI
c! td cd
•n to to
Zoo
00 00 CM
CM as r^
as oo m
rH OS



in m o
OS CO CM
CM OS CO
CM



O O O
o o o
o os m
T



m o
r^ co
m r^




0 0
o o
r^ PS.
co co







•* 
-------
VICINITY  MAP

-------
interconnected shaft or slope nines in the surrounding area east



and north of Latrobe.






Mine Ho. 5356



     At the time of the survey, Mine No. 5356 represented the largest



single source of mine drainage discharge in the Loyalhanna Creek




watershed.  The discharge was 5,097 gpm and carried an acid load of



19,572 Ib/day.  The drainage flowed from a concrete culvert at the




base of the railroad bed just east of the community of Crabtree.



During periods of low flow conditions, the effluent from this mine



represents nearly the entire flow in Crabtree Creek.  It was re-



ported that the discharge point serves as a common dralnway for



other large underground mines which were located in this general



area.  There were no discharges located at any of these other mines.






Mine No. 536U



     The discharge from Mine No. 536U was located along the bank



of Loyalhanna Creek just downstream from the confluence of Monastery



Run.  At this point, a horizontal pipe extending from the bank, sev-



eral feet above stream level, discharged an effluent of 1,990 BP™



which carried an acid load of 17,860 Ib/day.  At least a portion of



this total discharge is associated with the abandoned St. Vincent



Mine.  Five other discharge points were located in the surrounding



area (Mine No.'s 5559, 5260, 5261, 5262 and 5263).  It is assumed



that these discharges are also associated with the St. Vincent Mine.
                             99

-------
     A local resident reported that the horizontal pipe was  in-



stalled in an attempt to drain the water from the mine as  rapidly



as possible.  Before Installation of the pipe, the drainage  was



discharged to the surface by a number of boreholes and natural



drainways.  The five discharges listed above may represent points



where that part of the total discharge, which exceeds the  capacity



of the pipe, is discharged to the surface.   At the time of sampling,



an estimated 50-100 gpm of additional drainage was forced  through



the strata surrounding the pipe at the major discharge site  (No.
     As is the case with Mine No. 's 5177 and 5356,  the effluent



from Mine No. 53&H is believed to represent a cumulative discharge



from other mines interconnected with the St. Vincent Mine.   Such



mines could include those at Baggaley, Hostetter, and Whitney.



The discharge point may even drain mines outside the Loyalhanna



Creek watershed such as the mine at Marguerite.   This abandoned



mine is located near the headwaters of Sewickley Creek which



drains to the Monongahela River.





Mine No. 's 5163 and 5l6U





     These mines are located on an unnamed tributary to Getty Run.



Both mines were hillside drifts directly across from each other on



opposite banks of a small tributary.  A small refuse pile was asso-



ciated with each mine indicating that neither mine was developed to



any large extent.  The acid loads from Mine No. 's 5163 and 516H were



688 Ib/day, and 586 Ib/day, respectively.
                            100

-------
Mine No. 5170





     This mine was located near the headwaters of Getty Run where



Route 819 crosses the stream.  It was not determined if the dis-



charge point represented an old mine opening or whether this was



a drainway for the numerous mines in the area.  The opening is



adjacent to the railroad tracks immediately behind St. Sylvester



Church.  The discharge was 2kQ gpm and carried an acid load of



U,060 Ib/day.





Mine No. 5171





     Mine Ho. 5171 vas located downstream of Mine Ho. 5170 on



the same side of Getty Run.  The opening was located about 30



feet above stream level and discharged **5 gpm.  The acid load



was 9*0 Ib/day.
Mine Mo. 5173





     This mine contributed a discharge of 50 gpm which carried an



acid load of 936 Ib/day.  The area had originally been deep mined



and was then strip mined at a later time.  A local resident stated



that underground mines were in limited operation as far back as



l853<  In addition to this major discharge point, an acid load of



35 Ib/day was contributed by the fanway opening to the mine.
                           101

-------
Mine No. 5176





     This mine opening may be interconnected with Mine No.'s 5171



and 5172.  The openings are at approximately the same elevation



on opposite sides of the same hill.   The opening at No. 5176 has



completely caved and the 25 gpm effluent discharges from the base



of the slumped area.  The outcrop coal on both sides of this mine



has been removed by surface mining.   These operations have  cre-



ated numerous points of intersection with the underground mine



voids.





Mine No. 5263





     Mine No. 5263 is the only surface mine site classified as a



principal source in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.  The mine was



located on an unnamed tributary to Mill Creek west of the commu-



nity of Oak Grove.  There were actually two surface mine sites



near the headwaters of the tributary.  There were no major  dis-



charge points emanating from either surface mine.  However, con-



siderable seepage was present along the downslope perimeter of



both mines.  This seepage has a cumulative effect which was re-



sponsible for the degraded water quality in the tributary.   The



acid load measured in the stream below the mined areas was  k$k Ib/day.






Site No. 5351





     A large mine refuse dump near the communities of Hostetter



and Baggaley contributed an acid load of 1,928 Ib/day to an un-



named tributary of Ninemile Run.  There was no discharge from
                           10?

-------
an underground mine at this site.  The degraded water quality of



the snail tributary was a direct result of the refuse pile.   Tbis



pile is located imediately adjacent to the tributary along an



area about O.U mile in length.





Site No. 5355





     Below the large mine refuse dump at Hannastown, Crabtree



Creek carried an acid load of 898 Ib/day.  The gradual accumula-



tion of seepage at the base of the refuse pile and the subsequent



discharge to Crabtree Creek results in the acid condition found



in the stream.





Mine Ho.'a 536l. 5362 and 5363





     The acid loads contributed by these mine sit* discharge



points were 907 Ib/day, 835 Ib/day, and U28 Ib/day, respectively.



They are considered in this section as individual discharge points



but actually they are associated with the major discharge found at



Mine No. 536U (See Mine No. 536U, page 99 ).



     Bo. 5361 and 5362 were located on Four-mile tun above St. Vincent



Lake.  The discharges were artesian in nature and responsible for the



somewhat swampy area found above the lake.  Several other areas were



located along the banks of Fourmile Run which appeared to contribute



additional drainage during other hydrologic periods.
                           103

-------
     AT vertical pipe emerging from the stream bed in the middle



of Loyalhanna Creek was the source of the effluent found at



Ho. 5363.  This pipe was located only a few feet downstream of



the major discharge point, Ho. 536U.  This second effluent was



62 gpm and carried an acid load of U28 Ib/day.

-------
CONEMAUGH RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
             MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
                      105

-------
                           COR9AUBH RIVER






                               AHD OOMCLUSIOHS
1.  The Conemaugh River and its minor tributaries drain an area  of



    310 square miles.   The entire 51 mile length of the Conemaugh



    River from its formation at Johnstown to its confluence with



    Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg is severely polluted as  a result



    of coal mine discharges.  This water quality degradation results



    from mine discharges within the drainage boundary as well as



    from massive amounts of mine drainage inflow contributed by  Stony



    Creek, Blacklick Creek, and the Little Conemaugh River.



2.  A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately 1,700 acres of



    surface mined area were investigated in the study area.  Discharges



    from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 1,710 gpm and  totalled



    over If. 3 million gallons per day (mgd).  The total net acid  load



    discharged by the 36 sources was 35,10U Ib/day.



3.  There was only one active underground mine in operation at the



    time of the survey.  This was Mine Ho. 5200 which contributed an



    alkaline load of 8 Ib/day.  Abandoned drift mines and  coal refuse



    piles were the major sources of pollution in the sub-basin.   These



    sources contributed more than 80 percent of the total  net acid load



    discharged by all sources in the watershed.



U.  A total of six principal sources of mine drainage discharge  were



    located in the Conemaugh River and minor tributaries sob-basin.



    These sources discharged a total net acid load of 30,1*95 Ib/day.
                                 10G

-------
This represents approximately 86 percent of the acid load contri-



buted by all discharging sources.






                       DESCRIPTION OF AREA



     The Conetnaugh River is formed by the confluence of Stony Creek




and the Little Conetnaugh River at Johnstown, Pennsylvania.   From this



point, the river flows generally north and west some 51 miles to its



confluence with  Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg, Pennsylvania.  The



confluence of Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River form the



Kiskiminetas River.  The drainage area of the Conemaugh River and



minor tributaries is 310 square miles.  This does not include the



drainage areas of major tributaries such as the Little Coneraaugh



River, Stony Creek, Blacklick Creek or Two Lick Creek.  These major



drainage areas are included as separate sub-basin reports.






                    STREAM WATER QUALITY




     As a result of the grossly polluted acid condition of both the



Little Conemaugh River and Stony Creek, and additional acid discharges



received by the main stem, the Conemaugh River is severely polluted by



coal mine drainage over its entire 51 mile length.   The river bed and



high water levels are heavily stained and coated with precipitated



iron compounds resulting from the mine drainage discharges.  Alkaline



tributary inflow entering the river is immediately assimilated with



no water quality improvement in the main stem.
                              107

-------
     During the course of the field study,  several stream locations




were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 13,  Figure 9).   These sta-




tions were selected to measure the cumulative  effects of mine drain-




age.  A summary of this data is presented in Table lh.   The water




quality data collected from Stony Creek at  Riverside and from the




Little Conemaugh River at East Conemaugh are included.   This data




reflects the background water quality of the tributaries which form




the Conemaugh River.




     With the exception of Tubmill Creek, all  of the streams shown




in Table 13 are affected in varying degrees by mine drainage dis-




charges over their entire length.  The major mine discharge points




on Tubmill Creek which degrade the water quality of the stream are




located near the mouth of the tributary. Although there were a few




mine discharges located in the headwater area, they had little effect




upon the water quality of the stream.




     The sources of pollution inventoried in the Conemaugh River sub-




basin were limited to those sources emanating  from active or abandoned




coal mine operations.  Wo attempt was made  to  document pollutional dis-




charges of a different source type.  Although  mine drainage is the




major source of pollution in most of the streams in the Kiskiminetas




River basin, pollution problems from sources other than mine drainage




do exist.  The effects upon the water quality  of the Conemaugh River,




Little Conemaugh River, and Stony Creek from steel mill and other in-




dustrial discharges were not documented.  During the course of the




field study, discharges from such sources were located along the banks
                              108

-------
                         TABLE 13

Stream water quality sampling stations,  Conemaugh River
             main stem and minor tributaries

4792
4984
4983
5261
5382
5619
5620
5621
5625

May, 1968
June, 1968
June, October, 1968
July, December, 1968
January, 1969
August, October and
November, 1968
October, November and
December, 1968
October, November, 1968
January, 1969
October, November, 1968
January, 1969
October, November and
Stream
Two Lick Greek
Two Lick Creek
Blacklick Creek
Little Conemaugh
River
Stony Creek
Conemaugh River
Richards Run
Tubmill Creek
Aultmans Run
Location
Near Mouth
Near Moutt
USGS gage
USCS gage
Conemaugh
U3GS gage
USGS gage
Near Moutl
Near Moutl
Near Moutl:
      December, 1968
                        109

-------
         e
**    t-t >rt

"    al
-*    s


2    *
cfl    «
 9 *H

 §!
 B 5
W2
        J

                •a ^
                i-(
                ^
                r-t


                I
                 8.
                00
                           r>    in   ao » m
                                         9   5 4 at  O 3 JS
                                        » m   coco-*    intxcb    POO      co      <- N 35
                                           oo eo r-<
                                                           o»o>-<    f» «•> Q    •» e*
                                                           <0 ee CM    in 1-1 2    CM O
                                                           r- « ce    CM CM CM      .-i
                                                                                            o oo co  r» o»
                                                                                            neoc.  en t- r
                                                                                            t-«    m     en »
                        •-« CM    CM   CM
                        r* ox    r-t   m m en   o* o r*
                        ri O
                                                           r-r--*
                                                           * « o
                                                           Or-r-l
                                                                           i-i    •* -J O   •« O O   r~ -< P-H
                                                                                      O    r~^e«i
                                                                                      >M    ^ CO CM
                        ON    t-i   oo-ff   m 00 Q   op op O    O 00
                                                  > *H r<   ^ so CM    o M
                                                  » 4 ^*   r** ^^ !n    o W

                                                  • oo" c*>   r-" m m    -*" «* r*-*   <*"
                                                  »r^r^   mr*»n    tncMop
                                                                                 r-   O
                                                                                 O   (SI
                                                                                      O    ^   CM    rx

                                                                                      S'8   2'8

                                                                                      «    g   en'   g
                           "^   o    OOO   Omo   moo    oom    *A   o    m   oo   »A
                           oo\   minr»
                   ° 3    ^*   3 ^ N
                   ^< CM    iH   »-(
                                                                  (M « CM   i-4 (O CM
                                                                      fih    m    CM 9 m    CM  r-t <
<       «-H    p-t rH (M    -^  f-4







> m    I-H    Q O O    O  «M *
I oo    ON    00 9t sp    wS  «O (




       4n    in 5» «it    i-*  r*. i
                                                             I «

                         •tf^    A <
                           So    tn
                           eg    O
                                                              88   888   838   §25   iC5
                                                              do o   S ^ o   -* (^ *   in*4in   •* o^-
                           CM    f-l    iH
                                                                                       i


                                      QQ<*]    "« ^ -J    CM CM CM    •t»V>    OOO    i^tXrM
                                      $«*    3§S    SSS    222    233    332
                                                            m ^ in    tttnin    3i Jo ^    55 S in
                                      * •« -a

-------

-------
of the-above mentioned streams.   This was particularly evident in the



Johnstown and nearby community areas.






                    SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE




     A description of the mine drainage sources in the Conemaugh River




sub-basin follows.  All mine location sites inventoried during the



study are shown in Figure 10 following the source description section.






Hinckston Run




     Only one source of mine drainage discharge was located in the 15



square mile drainage area of Hinckston Run.  The discharge rate was



72 gpm which carried a net alkaline load of 101 Ib/day.  The discharge



emerged from a small opening in the hillside adjacent to the road.  It



did not appear that a mine portal was located in this area; however,



the opening may serve as a drainway for a mine in another location.



The hillside along much of the east bank of Hinckston Run was actively



in use as a slag dump by one of the nearby mills.






St. Glair Run




     Six surface mines and 12 drift mine openings were located on



this small tributary.  The only source of mine drainage was from Mine



No. 5365.  This mine was an open drift located nearly 200 feet verti-



cal below a circular hilltop surface mine.   The acid load discharged




by Mine No. 5365 was 121 Ib/day.
                              112

-------
Conemaugh River - below Johnstown



     Mine No. 5l8l and 5182 were located along the Conemaugh River at



Coopersdale on the north side of Johnstown.  Between this point and the



downstream community of Seward (about 6 miles) there were no mines lo-




cated on either the main stem of the river or on any of the tributaries



to the river.



     Mine No.'s 5l8l and 5182 were located behind the Haws Refractory



Plant on Route U03«   Both mines were abandoned; however, it appeared



that Mine No. 5l8l had recently been closed.  Both the portal and air-



way were still open.  Mine 5182 had been abandoned for some time.  The



opening had completely slumped and the drainage emerged via pipe from



the base of the caved opening.  The acid load discharged by Mine No.  5182



was 150 Ib/day and Mine No. 5l8l contributed a negligible alkaline load.



     The next downstream coal mine operation was located along the north



bank of the Conemaugh River just east of the small community of Boltz.



A large underground mine was located in this area; however, the mine



openings have been closed and covered.  A refuse pile of several acres



is associated with the mine.  At the time of inspection, there was no



drainage from either the caved mine openings or from the refuse pile.



A series of h boreholes were located on the west side of Boltz.   All



but one of these openings were capped or sealed.



     Two dry drift mine openings were located along the opposite bank



of the river directly across from Boltz.  Both mines were driven dir-



ectly under Route 56, about 0.6 mile upstream of the community of Seward.



A borehole discharge of 300 gpm was located near the downstream area  of



Seward.  There were two boreholes at this site; however, the total
                              113

-------
discharge was contributed by one opening.   The acid  load  carried by




this effluent (No.  5366)  was 3,5^5 Ib/day.



     The active underground Conemaugh No.  1 Mine of  the North American



Coal Corporation is located directly across from Mine No.  5366  on  the



opposite bank of the Conemaugh River.  This was  one  of two active  mine



operations in this  sub-basin area which were not inventoried during



the field study. Recent  information supplied by the Commonwealth  of



Pennsylvania indicates that this mine produces an alkaline effluent




and treatment is not required.  An air shaft for this mine is located



near Hedges Lake.






Big Spring Run, Sugar Run, Baldwin Run




     These tributaries were the next downstream  areas on  which  coal



mine operations were located.  A total of four drift mines, one strip



mine, and one combination surface-underground mine were  located on



these tributaries.   All of the mines were dry and it did  not appear



that the mines contributed any more than insignificant amounts  of



seepage to the receiving tributaries.  The pH and conductivity  values



measured at the mouth of these streams ranged from 6.9 to 8.0 and



from 90 to 170 micromhos/cm, respectively.






Conemaugh River - main stem




     Mine No. 5367 was located along the bank of the Conemaugh  River



approximately 0.8 mile upstream of the small community of Lockport.



Two openings to the mine were located.  The effluent was 17 gpm which
                              11U

-------
discharged an acid load of 69^ Ib/day directly to the river.



     The Robinson Mine of the Florence Mining Company  was located



on the Conemaugh River east of the community of Robinson.   This active



underground mine vas not inventoried during the field survey.   Recent



information supplied by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania indicates



that the Robinson Mine is now interconnected with several additional



active mines.  At the present, three of the four discharges from this



underground complex are alkaline.  Adequate treatment is provided for




the one acid discharge.






Richards Run




     A total of 15 drift mine openings and one surface mine were



located within the seven square mile drainage area of this tributary.



     The first two discharging mines were located on the East  Branch



of Richards Run.  At Mine No. 5186 an acid load of 39 Ib/day was dis-



charged by a caved drift mine opening.  A second discharging mine



(No. 5185) was located about 100 yards upstream of Mine 5186.   At the



time of the field survey, Mine No. 5185 was in the process of  being



sealed.  The mine had only recently been closed and workmen were in-



stalling mine seals at the three openings to the mine.   Two of these



three openings discharged a combined effluent of 207 gpm.   However,



the discharge was essentially neutral as the acid load was only 10 Ib/day.



These openings were sampled before the installation of the mines seals



was completed.



     The other area of mine drainage discharge on this tributary was
                              115

-------
located near the headwaters of the West Branch.  A 15 gpm discharge



was sampled at Mine No. 5184.  nils opening Is probably Interconnected



with four additional openings In the Immediate area.  The acid load



carried by this effluent (No. 5l8fc) vas 117 Ib/day.  A second discharge



was located across the road from Mine No. 5l8U.  At this site a total



of U drift openings in two different coal seams were inspected.  Two



of the openings were caved drift portals and the other two openings



were slope entries for a new mine under development.  The only source



of drainage from this mine site vas seepage from a refuse pile.  The



acid load contributed by this source (No. 5183) vas 27^ Ib/day.



     Stream sampling at the mouth of Richards Run, conducted coincident



with the mine inventory, indicated that acid loads ranging from 1,000



Ib/day to lU,365 Ib/day (Tables 13, lU) vere discharged by this tributary



to the Conemaugh River.



     Below the mouth of Richards Run a small unnamed tributary enters



the Conemaugh River near the community of Robinson.  Four surface mines



and six drift mine openings were located on the tributary.  Four of



the mine discharges (Mine No.'s 5192, 5193, 519^ and 5195) result



from points of intersection between underground and surface mine



operations.  The combined acid load of these four discharges vas



522 Ib/day.  The major part of this acid load (316 Ib/day) was



contributed by Mine No. 5195-  An additional acid load of 22 Ib/day



was discharged by Mine No. 5197, a small drift mine not connected



with the surface mine operations.
                             116

-------
Tubmill Creek



     Tubmill Creek is a major tributary of the Conemaugh River.



With the exception of a few scattered surface mines in the head-



water area and the drift mines near its mouth, Tubmill waa unaf-



fected by mine drainage over nearly its entire 66 square mile




drainage area.



     Only two discharging mine sites were located on the head-



water tributaries to Tubmill Creek.  These were Mine No.'s 5276




and 5277 on Hypocrite Creek.  The total acid load discharged by



these mines was 5k Ib/day.



     Mine No. 5278 was located on Tubmill Creek approximately 2



miles above the mouth of the tributary.  At this point, an efflu-




ent of 185 gpm was discharged to Tubmill Creek.  The acid load of



this discharge was 2,098 Ib/day.  This discharge also imported a



very noticeable discoloration to the downstream length of Tubmill



Creek.  The mine appears quite limited in the extent of development;



however, a local resident reported that this mine intersected and



abandoned workings of a much larger mine.  Below this point and the



next downstream sources of mine drainage, additional mines were lo-



cated but they were dry.  Mine No.'s 5368 and 5369 discharged a



cumulative effluent of U5 gpm which carried a combined acid load of



more than 900 Ib/day.  In this area, a series of "punch holes" had



been driven into the exposed coal seam.  A total of eight openings



were located; however, only mine No.'s 5368 and 5369 were discharg-



ing at the time of Inspection.




     One additional major source of mine drainage discharge waa located
                             117

-------
on Freeman Run.  This stream Is a tributary of Tubmill Creek and joins



the main stem about 0.5 mile above its mouth.  Mine No. 5370 discharged



an acid load of U29 Ib/day to Freeman Run.  Five additional opnlngs



were located in this same general area but were dry.



     Stream sampling near the mouth of Tubmill Creek, conducted coincident



with the mine drainage survey, indicated that Tubmill Creek discharged



an acid load ranging from k,6kk Ib/day to 10^,101 Ib/day to the Conemaugh



River (Tables 13, Ifc).





McGee Run





     Only one discharging mine site was located in the 26 square mile



drainage area of McGee Run.  Several other mines were Investigated



but found dry.  A large underground mine was located near the community



of Seger.  The mine openings was caved and did not contribute any



drainage.  However, a large refuse pile associated with the mine degrades



the water quality of the small unnamed tributary to McGee Run which



drains the area.  An acid load of 3^7 Ib/day was measured in the



tributary below the refuse pile (No.  5373).



     Six drift mine openings and two surface mines were located along



the downstream length of McGee Run, however, these sites were dry.





Conemaugh River, main stem





     The largest acid load In the Conemaugh River main stem and minor



tributaries sub-basin study area was located along the south bank of



the river 0.1 mile below the confluence of McGee Run.  A 1,710 gpm



discharge was measured at this site (No.  5371)'   This discharge point
                             118

-------
probably serves as a common drainvay for several interconnected under-



ground mines in the surrounding area.  Such minss would include the



Brenizer Mine on McGee Run and several slope mines on the next downstream



tributary, Stony Run.  The acid load contributed by the 1,710 gpm



effluent was 17,5^5 lb/dav.  A second drainage point was located



adjacent to No. 5371.  This was No. 5372 which discharged an additional



effluent of 5 gpm carrying an acid load of 32 Ib/day.





Stony Run





     Approximately seven surface mines and 16 underground mine openings



were investigated on Stony Run.  There were no discharges located



at any of these mine sites.  As mentioned above, these mines may be



drained by the large discharge point located along the bank of the



Conemaugh River.





Altmans Run





     The upper 75 percent of the Altmans Run drainage area has been



extensively mined by both surface and underground operations.  Several



of the surface mines are quite large covering areas in excess of



100 acres.



     A large underground mine was located near the headwaters of Heal



Run, a tributary to Altmans Run, in the community of Mclntyre.  The



portal to the mine had been sealed and there was no discharge.  There



are two mine refuse dumps directly across from the Mclntyre Mine.



Considerable seepage was present about the perimeter of these areas.



Sample No.'s 55^2 and 55^3 indicated that the cumulative seepage
                             119

-------
from these piles contributed acid loads of 225 lb/day and 3,600



Ib/day respectively.  The effluent from No. 5562 drained to an unnamed



tributary of Reeds Run and No. 55^3 drained to Neal Run.



     Another significant acid load was discharged to Reeds Run by a



refuse dump near the headvaters of the tributary.  There was no mine



opening located near this dump area and it appears that the refuse



may have been trucked from Mclntyre.  The acid load contributed by



this source, No. 556^, was 2,079 lb/day.



     Mine No. 5565 was a slumped drift mine opening in the base of a



surface mine hlghwall.  The acid load discharged by this mine was



162 lb/day.  A small unnamed tributary which enters Reeds Run near



its mouth contributed an acid load of 1,627 lb/day to the stream.  This



small tributary receives significant amounts of seepage from a large



surface mined area.  There were no major point sources of discharge,



however, the water quality of the tributary is grossly degraded by



the cumulative seepage from the surface mine.  The tributary carried



an acid load of 1,627 lb/da^ near its mouth (No. 5566).



    A small tributary to Altmans Run carried an acid load of U9 lb/day



below a surface mined area.  This effluent (No. 5568) was the only



source of mine drainage discharge located on Altmans Run above the



confluence with Reeds Run.



     Two extensive surface mined areas vere located on Altmans Run



and its tributaries south of Route 28^.  Several under/round openings



were also located in  the hiphwalls of these strip mines.  Two active



underground mines were in operation at the time of the survey.  These
                             120

-------
were the No. 1 and No. 2 mines of the C & C Coal Company.  The No. 1



mine vas In operation at the time of inspection and a h gpm effluent



vas discharged via the fanway.  The effluent was alkaline.  The No. 2



mine was under development and at the time had penetrated the coal seam



to only a minimal extent.  Both of these operations were on Coal Run



which is a tributary to Altmans Run.



     A highly acid discharge was located on Coal Run within the same



surface mined area in which the C & C #2 mine was located.  A portion




of the surface mine was used for mire refuse disposal.  This waste



material was spread and compacted over several acres of strip mine



spoil piles.  An effluent of only 2 gpm was found near the base of



the refuse area.  However, the acidity concentration of this effluent



was 8,950 mg/1 (No. 5199).  A considerable number of trees and other



vegetation have been destroyed by the seepage from the refuse pile.



     Two large strip mine ponds near the confluence of Coal Run and




Altmans Run were sampled during the survey.  There was no surface



discharge at the time of sampling, however, the ponds may contribute



drainage during high flow periods or by subsurface seepage through the



the spoil piles.  These were No.'s 5569 and 5570 with acidity concen-



trations of 2^0 mf:/l and ljt mg/1, respectively.



     There were no sources of mine drainage below the confluence of



Coal Run with Altmans Run.  However, the acid condition of Altmans Run



persisted over the entire remaining downstream length of the tributary.



     Stream sampling near the mough of Altmans Run, conducted coincident



with the mine drainage inventory, indicated that this stream discharged



an acid load ranging from 1,7^0 Ib/day to 106,9^6 Ib/day to the Conemaugh



River (Tables 13,

-------
Conemaugh River, main stem




     Only a few mine operations were located in the area  of the basin




below the confluence of Altmans Run.  All but one of these operations



were drift or slope mines located along the banks of the  Conemaugh



River.  The one exception was a dry surface mine near the headwaters



of Boatyard Run.



     The active Marion Mine of the Tunnelton Mining Company is



located along the north bank of the Conemaugh River just  east of




the community of Tunnelton.  This mine is developed to the dip and



has a pumped discharge.  The mine is listed as "in compliance" accord-



ing to information supplied by the Commonwealth.



     Several additional mines were investigated along the remaining



downstream length of the Conemaugh River.  Such mines included those



located in the coal towns of White and Moween.  The only  source of



mine drainage discharge was from No. 5529.  This discharge point  did



not appear to represent a mine portal but rather it appeared to



represent a point where an underground mine had broken through to the



surface.  The acid load carried by this 22 gpm effluent was 207 Ib/day.



     A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately  1,700 acres



of surface mined area were investigated during this study.  Table 15



presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading



(Ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams in



the Conemaugh River main stem study area.  Table 16 presents a  sum-



mary of flow volumes and chemical loading by source type  for the  36



discharging sources inventoried during the study.
                            122

-------
















CO
0)
•rH

Cg ClJ
O 4J
j_i 3
4J Xl
CO t-l
}_l
00 4J
C
•H Jj
> 0
•H C
<1J -H
u e
in rJ T3
r-l C
r^ Cfl
ti XI
JO CO S
Id 60 4J
H C co
•rH
^3 C
cd «H
O cd
rH e

0) •>
00 rJ
a £
nj W
18 -a
,
cd
C ^3
a) ^s
CO >-
•
•u cd
cd -O
14-1 -^
r-l XS
3 r-i
CO N_>



CO /->
OJ >,
r-i oj cd
cd c *O
•P *O *— ^
0 U Xi
E-i cd rH
g-t v^x



al rs/^
IS 4J >,
•H cd

cd -i-i ^
•U U Xl
O •< r-<
H ^>

<0
00
rH (-1
cd cd ^™^
4J X! 6
0 t3 0
H w W
•H *-*
Q
CO
V
VM O
O (4
• 3
O O
& CO









60
C
•H
•H cd
01 0)
O JJ
 CO -H CO C
•H XI & XI 5
Prf -rl 1-1 K
rJ XI )-l
X -U 60 4J CO
60 3 C
3 *O ^u ^3 cfl
S 6 w 6 4J
Q) c^ C nj n^
C CO C 3
0 C 0 £ <

in CM m CM 
rl -H
X 01 rJ C Oi Pd C
0) XI O 3 3
c BrtP-, WC4JCO
(UXi C>^ • co3 ra3C
J-i 3 C[i •*-* cdK CUOS'H
Pt4 H P CO W 5 ffi
ON
O
O

O
vO
CO



r-
oo
m
*»
rH
rH




CM
VO
VO
**
r^
^j"





ON
r^
ON
O
CM





xt
O
rH
*\
in
CO




in
o
*v
CO



^O
ro


c/i
r-4
^J
g












-------
                         VICINITY MAP
                       FIGURE
CONEMAUGH  RIVER. MAINSTEM AND MINOR  TR1BUTAI
                                                                                  JOHNSTOWN

-------





































vO
^^
4)
i— i
XI
cd
H





















































CO
0)
•H
P
cd
4J
3
CD x>
CX-rl
S^ lj
**» w
•U 4J
(U p
0 O
l-i C
8•* C
xi cd

co E
60 53
C 4J
•rl CO
T3
cd C
O -H
^^ rt
£3
0)
bO •>
rt rl
C cu
•H >
£3
•ort
x:
cu oo
C 3
•rl fl)
cu
C
O
O


















*~\
§>>
cd
n T3
•rl ^
e xi
3 T-t
rH •—'
<:
co *-**
CO >,
Q) cd
C "O
cd ^
bo Xi
C r-l
S^
c
0 x-v
tl >S
M cd
T)
|-_j **«s.
cd xi
•LJ r-l
O ^^
H

S~\
>
jj- cd
id "O
M-l ^
i-l XI
3 1-1
CO v-'


CO *~*
CO >s
r-i co n)
cd C 13
4J T3 ^-
O rl X>
H flj r-l
W ^



U
<0 >,^v
25 w >•>
•H cd
rH 13 T3
cd VH ^^
4J y xi
O < r-l
H ^


cu
bo
I-l
i— 1 rt /~s
cd xi e
4J CJ (X
O co bO
H -H "^-^
Q

CO
M-l CU
O 0
rl
• 3
0 0
E5 CO


V
(X
>-,
H

CO
o
l-l

o
co
vO O
CO
 o
vO
rsi





r-l O
CSI
CM
O
1-1




m oo
o -*
oo
n
r~-
fO





-0 -H
.U C J-) 4J
14-1 Cd M-l U
. fl Xi -H cd
L fl) rl ^^
Q ^ Q
r^- r^ O CTN
o r~- o
r-l r-l



vO vO O O\
CM CM CO






CO O r-l CM
O o r~
r-l .






VO <)• CM l^>
O CM 
CO .^v /"N C ^^ CO"O
S*o co *o o T3 i— i co
0) C CO -HO) -H C
•rl C -rl C 4J C &, O
So So n) o -a
•O tJ C T3 CO C
D- C 4JC -HC COcd
•Hn) i*-icd ,Qcd 3X1
J-iXS cdXl EXl MHO)
•u cd x3 cd 5 cd 0)^-*
CO ^ CO ^^ CJ ^^ f2
c*
o
ON



0
vD
ro





r-^
00
in
i— i
i




CM
vO
vO
M
r>-
<)•




o>
i^
ON
Ft
O
CM






-------
                        POLLUTICB ABATEMENT





     As shown In Table 16, abandoned drift mines are the principal



pollution sources within the Conemaugh River main stem and minor



tributaries study area.  There are also several major sources of



mine drainage pollution emanating from other source types.  Similar to



the main stem Kiskiminetas River, abatement of mine drainage sources in



this study area would be of minimal value due to the massive amounts



of mine drainage which are discharged to the Little Conemaugh River,



Stony Creek, Blacklick Creek, and Two Lick Creek.  Significant reduction



or even complete elimination of mine drainage in this study area would



result in an insignificant water quality improvement in the main stem



Conemaugh River.  For this reason pollution abatement activities are



justified only at such a time when consideration can be given to a



total river basin abatement program, or as the final phase of an



abatement program which has achieved drainage control on a downstream



priority basis.  However, abatement of a single source ot mine complex



within the study area may have merit as a demonstration site for the



feasibility study of a particular mine drainage abatement problem.



     Based on the initial field survey sampling program, six of the



total 36 discharging sties contributed about 87 percent of the total



acid load measured in the study area.  The combined acid load of these



sources was more than 15 tons per day.  Assuming previous or concurrent



abatement of upstream discharges and similar abatement of the major



discharge points on Blacklick  Creek and Two Lick Creek, drainage



control at these six principal sites should result In a significant
                              128

-------
water quality improvement in the main stem Conemaugh River.




     Perhaps the most significant reduction in acid load from any




single source could be attained through drainage control of the




large discharge (No. 5371) along the bank of the Conemaugh River




below the mouth of McGee Run.  This single effluent discharged an




acid load of 17,5^5 Ib/day, approximately 50 percent of the total




acid load discharged by all sources.




     The six principal sources mentioned above can provide a rela-




tive indication of where the major mine drainage pollution problems




occur in the study area.  Detailed engineering studies conducted




during an entire water year may necessitate the consideration  of




additional sources or perhaps deletion of some sources initially




considered.  Until such a time, these six sources can effectively




serve as a first phase or priority in a program of drainage source




abatement.




     The following is a more detailed description of the six prin-




cipal sources mentioned above.  A listing of these sources is shown




in Table 17.  The location of these mine sites are shown in Figure 11.




All mine sites which contributed an acid load exceeding 1500 Ib/day




are considered as principal sources.





                      PRINCIBVL SOURCES




Mine No. 52?8




     This mine is located on Tubmill Creek approximately two miles




above the mouth of the tributary.  At this point, a series of drift




openings have been developed along the coal outcrop.  All but one of




these openings were dry. The one discharging opening (No. 5278) contributed
                            129

-------





B
rd
CO
l-i
U

61
C
*H
^
.
Q)
O

&

cD

&
CO >i i-H
•H -rH
Jj TJ
t« -t-t
4J O
3 
•H ••-(
L> aL
(X,
60
^ ^*v
g& g
o o
0) r-l 61
C Pu ^
O
O
g
•H
s

o

I
H
O
Z
0)
C
•H
2








V*
CU
co
i-i
U

r—4
1-1
•H
js
3
H
oo
ON
O
CM





in
*^-
ON







O
O
vO
i— 1





v£>
CM





m
oo
i— i




0)
C
•H

4J
4-1
•H



00
r^.
CM
m






^
co
^
•H
Cd

f^
60
3

0
s
O


^j-
m
m





m
oo
ON







0
o
v^
rv
CM





f-
CM





O
O
CO




CO
C
'g

4J
U-l
w


^o
vD
en
m






(4
co
^
a

r^
60
3
n)
e
co
c
o
0
m
x^
in
t^.
i— i




m
m
00







0
o
o
f\





CM

•H
il
Q


^
f*^
Cn
m












C
3
oi

n)

2
O
O
v£>
(T)





O
0
o

m
CM




0
O
vO
O
rH




ro
CM





CM
r-l




CO
1-1
•rl
D-l
CO
CO
(4-1
cS


ro

in
m
1










C
3
o£

CO
T)
CO

&

r++.
o
CM





O
m
oo

CO





o
0
o
*\
vD





CM
m





m
-3-





r-l
•H
&J
Q)
CO
3
M-l
(S


^J.
vO
m
in
c
a
CO
co
s
o
4-1

•
•i-l
l-l
4J

"O
co
e
c
c
p

CM
vO
i— 1





in
CM
oo

CM





O
0
o
VO





1






oo
•3F





CO
1

ex
•H
4J
w


vO
vO
m
m



















m
ON

-------
                        VICINITY MAP
     SALTSBORO
                       FIGURE I !

CONEMAUGH  RIVER. MAINSTEM AND MINOR  TRIBUTE
             PRINCIPAL  SOUPCE  LOCATION MAP

-------
an effluent of 185 gpm.  The acid load carried by this effluent was



2,098 Ib/day.  This discharge imparts very noticeable discoloration to



Tubmill Creek which persists over the remaining downstream length of



the stream.  The small refuse area associated with this series of mine



openings suggests that the mine was limited in the extent of develop-



ment.  A local resident reported that this mine intersected the workings



of a larger mine and now serves as a drainway for the larger mine.






Mine Ho. $366






     The effluent from this mine is discharged from a bore hole



located along the bank of the Conemaugh River near the community of



Seward.  There are actually two borehols at the site, however, the



second opening was dry.  A filled shaft mine opening was located near



the discharge point but it was not determined if this mine was the



source of the borehole discharge.






Mine Ho. 5371





     Mine No. 53T1 contributed the largest acid load of any mine located



in this study area.  The discharge point is located along the south



"bank of the Conemaugh River immediately below the mouth of McGee Run.



The effluent was 1,710 gpm which discharged an acid load of 17,5^5 Ib/day



to the river.  The discharge point is not a mine portal but rather



appears to be an area where a drainway for an underground mine has



been constructed.  This drainway may represent the common discharge



point for several interconnected underground mines.  Such mines could
                             133

-------
include' the Brenizer Mine as veil as other mines located on Stony



Run.






No. 5563






     A mine refuse pile was responsible for the drainage found at



No. 5563.  This refuse area is one of several associated with the



abandoned Me In tyre Mine.  At the time of inspection, considerable



seepage was present along the downslope side of the refuse pile.  This



cumulative seepage (12 gpm) discharged an acid load of 3>^00 Ib/day



to Neal Run.  The acidity concentration of this effluent was 25,000 mg/1.






Ho. 556k






     Another mine refuse pile was responsible for the drainage at



this location.  This dump is located near the headwaters of Reeds



Run.  There was no mine opening located in this immediate area and



it appears that the refuse was trucked from  Mclntyre.  The acid load



discharged by source No. 55^ was 2,079 Ib/day.






Mine No.
     An acid load of 1,62? Ib/day was discharged to Altmans Run by




a small unnamed tributary which enters the stream near the small community




of Jacksonville.  This unnamed tributary is located adjacent to a large




surface mined area which covers more than 100 acres.  Seepage was




present along the entire downslope side of the distrubed area.  There




were no major point sources of discharge, however  the water quality of




the tributary was grossly degraded by the cumulative seepage from the



partially reclaimed surface mine.




                              13>4

-------
    BIACKLICK CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
        135

-------
                          BIACKLICK CREEK



                      SUMKRY AHD COHCLUSICBS





1.  Blacklick Creek and its minor tributaries drain  an area of 222



square miles.  The entire length of main stem Blacklick Creek between



the communities of Vintondale and Blairsville is seriously polluted



as a result of coal mine discharges.  Two Lick Creek, a major tributary



to Blacklick Creek, is considered as a separate sub-basin report.





2,  A total of l6l discharging sources and approximately 1,675 acres



of surface mined area were investigated in the study area.  Discharges



from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 3,800 gpm and totalled



nearly 36-3 million gallons per day (mgd).  The total net acid load



discharged by the l6l sources was 273,073 lb/day.





3.  At the time of survey, a total of ih discharges from active mines



were inventoried in the Blacklick Creek drainage area.  The acid load



from these sources was 13^,M*9 lb/day, or nearly one-half of the total



acid load discharged by all l6l sources.  However, the contribution



from active mines has been significantly reduced by the installation



of treatment facilities at the active mine sites.





U.  Drift mines and mine refuse piles were the major sources of abandoned



mine drainage discharge in the Blacklick Creek watershed.  These two



source types contributed an acid load exceeding 5^ tons per day.



Disregarding the acid load from active sources,  this 5^ tons per day



acid load represented nearly 80 percent of the acid load discharged



by all abandoned sources.
                              136

-------
5.  A total of 18 principal sources of mine drainage discharge were



located in the study area.  These sources include seven drift mines,



four combination mines, four mine refuse piles, two strip mines, and



one shaft mine.  These sources discharged a total net acid load of



125,120 Ib/day.  This represents about 90 percent of the acid load



contributed by abandoned mines in the study area.








                       DESCRIFTICK OF AREA.





     The North Branch of Blacklick Creek rises near the community of



Carrolltown and flows southwest toward the confluence with South Branch



Blacklick Creek near Vintondale.  The North Branch drains a JO square



mile area of Indiana and Cambria Counties.



     South Branch Blacklick Creek rises above the community of Revloc.



The stream is U-shaped and drains an area of k& square miles in Cambria



County.  The communities of Revloc, Nanty Glo, Twin Rocks, and Vinton-



dale are located along the main stem of the South Branch.



     Blacklick Creek is formed by the confluence of the North and



South Branches of Blacklick Creek near Vintondale.  From this point



the stream flows generally west some 32 miles to the confluence with



the Conemaugh River near Blairsville.  Between the communities of



Vintondale and Blairsville, Blacklick drains an area of 104 square



miles.  This includes the drainage area of all minor tributaries but



does not include Two Lick Creek.  This major drainage area is Included



in a separate sub-basin report.
                              .137

-------
                       STREAM WATER QUALITY





     At the time of the mine drainage source investigation, the main



stem of North Branch Blacklick Creek vas affected by mine drainage



below the confluence of Dutch Run.  The portions of the drainage area



above Dutch Run were not affected by coal mine discharges.  Several



portals and airways to underground mines were located, however, these



sites did not contribute  any discharge.  The area of the North Branch



most serisouly affected by mine drainage was that portion of the main



stem below the confluence of Elk Creek.  Elk Creek and tributaries to



Elk Creek were grossly polluted by large pump discharges from active



underground mines.



     South Branch Blacklick Creek was unaffected by mine drainage



above the community of Revloc.  Below this area the stream was totally



degraded by a series of pump discharges from active underground mines.



Abandoned mines in this area also contributed drainage to South Branch



Blacklick Creek.



     Downstream of Vintondale, Blacklick Creek received major acid



discharges from both active and abandoned coal mines.  The distribution



and magnitude of the discharges were such that the entire length of



Blacklick Creek was totally degraded by mine drainage.  There was no



point along the main stem where the water quality of Blacklick Creek



was improved by alkaline tributary inflow or by dilution and neutral-



ization of the upstream discharges.



     During the courseof the 1968 field study several stream locations
                             138

-------
                                    TABLE 18
                     Stream water quality sampling stations
                                 Blac&lick Creek
Station
  No.
  Sampling Periods
    Stream
       Location
  U983

  1*979



  U977


  U978


  5201


  5121

  520U


  1+982

  U980

  ^976
June, Oct, 1968

June, Oct, 1968



June, Oct, 1968


June, Oct, 1968


June, Oct, Nov, 1968


June, Oct, Nov, 1968

July, Nov, 1968


June, Oct, 1968

June, Oct, 1968

June, Oct, Nov, 1968
Blacklick Creek

Blacklick Creek
South Branch
Blacklick Creek

North Branch
Blacklick Creek

North Branch
Blacklick Creek

Elk Creek

South Branch
Blacklick Creek

Aulds Run

Ramsey Run

Unnamed trib to
Blacklick Creek
 USGS gage @ Josephine

 Relow confluence of
 North Branch and
 South Branch
 Near mouth


 Near mouth


Above mouth of Elk Cr.

 Near Mouth


 At Rt. U22

 Near mouth

 Near mouth


 Near mouth
                                    139

-------
ON      .
«:•§
H f*
<«
4J rH
H g,
1
.0
01 rH
4J
ctf
rH
3 rH
CO -v.
ff

.X
*"s.
m .a
W f»
0)
I
rl
«rH
IP
X iX
JJ it)
•H T3
•H X)
JT
rH
tri
V rH
o \
H tf
eciflc
uctance
£1
-l £

cn
I r =
ON lA if\
-* «A sO
SO O CO
lA CM -*
fl CM
O r*-. o
r^ o NO
CM tA CM
fi r- ON
ON ON CM
en ON en
rH fl CM

ft CM m
 tA lA
CM o or~
O Q 00
lO O rH
oo CM cn
rH CM
SSS

Ul

o
Sz t
ON rH Q
SON 5
1-1 CM
oo CM cn
00 l~ Os
f*. so m
r- m r»
§r» CM
CM CM

cn 01 oo
m so «*
m o «-i
m fi o
O ON C*«
m o cn
Cn rH rH
m NO o
r* CM m
O 00 CM
cn IM cn
o •* cn
Sen ON
r~ CM
oo m oo
rH r*. NO
CM
OO 0
CM NO CM
rH l-H rH
O •* CM
•-••A It
Sf» rH
CM
m 00 rH
CM rH m
O CM CM
m cn ON
CM CM m
oo o •»
CM m m
rH
mom
CM O ON
rH rH rH
III
CN cn CM
00 00 ^
CM CM lA
0 O en
Q CM ft
lA CM iA
ON en cn
CO 00 00
#sC so
ON ON

3-1

CM
At r
r^ m
O> CM
O CM
«~

-» r-.
•* O
rH

m *a*
CM cn
sO 00
rH 5F
rH

m o
rH CM

SO ON
00 00


S3

m o
CM
o o
CM ON
rH rH

oo m
m r^
m o
•* 5
so CM

H

rH1 >
9 0
~> X

in t
to CM CM
•* CM rH
m •» cn
O r~ CM
cn CM CM
m 00 r»
Sm cn
-* so

so oo m
SO 00 •*
rH
r«. cn CM
CM rH rH
m m -»
CM cn m
•* 00 •»
SO NO l»
* m cn
-» 00 ON
rH
O O O
in a r*
•» NO rH
rH rH CM
so op m
WrHrH
m m so
o
CM CM CM
800 m
t- m
cn 1-1
rH
HI

Hi

|IS
so in co
m in o
cn m cn
moo

rH rH O
0 O O
Sm NO
CM NO

ON ON 4
rH CM CM
O m so
in O rH
in rH CM

O m o
32"°

gss
M rH
lA CM «*

r^ en ON
cn r- ft
NO CM CM

ON tA ft
en CM oo
rH 
-------

-------
were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 18).  These stations were



selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine drainage.  A summary



of this stream data is presented in Table 19*  The locations of the



sampling points are shown in Figure 12.





                     SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
     An estimated 275 mining sites and approximately 1,675 acres of



surface mined area vere investigated during this study.  Samples for



chemical analysis were collected from l6l sources discharging at the



time of the survey.  The total effluent from these sources was more



than 25 thousand gallons per minute (gpm)  or over 36 million gallons



per day (mgd).  The total net acid load discharged to Blacklick Creek



(excluding Two Lick Creek)  was over 136 tons per day.



     A description of the mine drainage sources follows.  All mine



site locations in the Blacklick Creek study area are shown in Figure 13'





                   NORTH BRANCH BIACKLICK CREEK





     All of the mine discharges located on this tributary resulted from



active underground mines.  These effluents were discharged to Elk



Creek, Dutch Run, and tributaries to Elk Creek.  A surface mine was



in operation along the very headwaters of the North Branch, however,



the mine was dry.





Elk Greek





     The Colver Mine, operated by Eastern Associated Coal Corporation,

-------
Is located near the headwaters of Elk Creek.  At the time of survey



the Colver Mine discharged an untreated effluent of 3,222 gpm (No. 5125).



The acid load carried by this discharge  approached 10 tons per day.



The Colver Mine has Installed treatment facilities since the 1968 survey.



According to recent (1971) information supplied by the Pennsylvania



Department of Environmental Resources this  treatment  results in a



final effluent exhibiting a net alkalinity.   However, at this time



the iron concentration often exceeds the permissible maximum and



additional upgrading of the facility will be required.  The present



discharge point Is now located approximately one mile vest of the



original bore hole discharge point No. 5125.  An acid effluent was



also collected at the base of the large refuse dump associated vith



the Colver Mine (No. 472*0.



     A second major active mine effluent vas discharged to Crooked



Run, a tributary to Elk Creek.  This effluent (No. 5012) is located



at Duman Lake Bark and results from the Lancashire Mines of Barnes



and Tucker Coal Company.  At the time of sampling the effluent vas



3,800 gpm and carried an acid load of more than 22 tons per day.   For



a period of time this effluent discharged to the Susquehanna River



drainage after a breakthrough near the community of Barnesboro.   This



diversion of discharge required a massive in-stream neautralization



effort by Pennsylvania in order to minimize the deleterious water



quality effects upon the West Branch Susquehanna River.  At the pre-



sent time the effluent has been eliminated from the Susquehanna



drainage and again discharges to Crooked Creek from the Duman Lake



Park bore holes.  Treatment facilities are presently in operation at
                             1*3

-------
the Duman lake site.





Dutch Run



     Two additional borehole discharges from the Barnes and Tucker



Mines were located on Dutch Run.   No.  5010 vas located approximately



one mile northwest of Duman Lake and No. 5011 was located near Stiles



Crossing.  The present location of these borehole discharges may differ



from those originally found.  However, according to the Pennsylvania



Department of Environmental Resources, these remaining Barnes and



Tucker discharges are treated and comply with the required effluent



standards.



     Sampling was conducted at several stream locations on North



Branch Blacklick Creek coincident with the mine inventory.  These



sample points were located near the mouth of North Branch (No. kS^Q),



near the mouth of Elk Creek (No.  5121), and on the North Branch above



Elk Creek (No. 5201).  This water quality data is shown in Table 18.





                  SOUTH BRANCH BIACKLICK CREEK





Revloc Area




     The South Branch of Blacklick Creek was unaffected by mine drain-



age above the community of Revloc.  The only indication of a mine op-



eration in this area was an operating air fan for an underground mine.



The pH of the stream above Revloc remained above 7.^ and the conduc-



tivity was less than 150 micromhos/cm.



     Mine refuse dumps associated with the Revloc No. 32 mine in the

-------
community of Revloc contributed significant amounts of highly



mineralized drainage to the South Branch.  These two dumps covered



approximately 38 acres and contributed an acid load of 1,057 Ib/day to



the South Branch.  Four samples were collected and each represent



cumulative seepage around the perimeter of the refuse areas. (No.'s



^3, ^5^, ^5, ^6).  The pH of the South Branch was 4.0 below



the mine dumps.



     The experimental treatment facility of the Bethlehem Mines



Corporation was located approximately one mile below (downstream)



of Revloc.  At this point the drainage from the Revloc No. 32 Mine



and the Cambria Slope No. 33 Mine was pumped to the surface via



bordhole.  At the time of inspection this experimental facility



was treating 1,200 gpm by use of lime neutralization.  An additional



effluent of approximately 2,000 gpm was by-passing the treatment



facility and discharged to the  South Branch.  At the time of sampling



(1968) the treated effluent was alkaline (778 Ib/day, No. 5188) while



the untreated portion of the effluent carried an acid load of more



than 6.5 tons per day (No. 5187).



     The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports



(1971) that this facility has been expanded to a full scale treatnent



plant and now provides treatment for the entire discharge from the



No. 32 *»d No. 33 Mines.  The alkaline effluent from this plant nay



exceed as much as 6 mgd.



     The Cambria No. 33 Slope Mine is located outside the Blacklick



Creek drainage area on a tributary to the Little Conemaugh River.
                              1U5

-------
However, the entire effluent from this mine is pumped to the facility



below Revloc for treatment.






Nanty Glo area




     The next downstream source of mine drainage discharge on the



South Branch was located near the community of Nanty Glo.   The




Bethlehem Mines Corporation Nanty Glo Mine No. 31 is located in



this community.  The discharge from this mine is via borehole



approximately one mile from the mine.  At the time of inspection,



a discharge of 2,700 gpm was measured at this site.  The acid load



discharged to the South Branch was more than 18 tons per day (No.



5189).  The iron load from this discharge exceeded four tons per



day.  The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports



(1971) that facilities are now under construction for treatment of



this effluent.



     There are two mine refuse dumps associated with the Nanty Glo



No. 31 Mine.  These two dumps cover an area of approximately 6k



acres.  Both mine dumps are located along a small unnamed tribu-



tary of the South Branch.  Considerable seepage was present at



the base of the piles and the cumulative result of this seepage



was the complete water quality degradation of the tributary.  Below



the southernmost pile, the stream carried an acid load exceeding



17.5 tons per day (No. 5037).  Seepage points from the other pile



contributed an additional acid load of 2,6HU Ib/day to the unnamed



tributary as well as a 1,015 Ib/day load directly to the South



Branch  (No.'s  5039 and 50^0).
                             1U6

-------
     Two small discharging abandoned drift mines were located in




the Nanty Glo area (Mine No.'s 5035 and 50*4-3); however, these




mines contributed only negligible acid loads.



     Mine No. U?95 was the only site discharging a significant



acid load to the South Branch between Nanty Glo and the down-



stream community of Twin Rocks.  At Mine No. U?95 a total effluent



of 100 gpm, emanated from three caved drift openings.  The acid



load carried by this effluent was 186 Ib/day.






Twin Rocks area




     A large refuse pile and several drift mine openings were



located adjacent to the South Branch immediately south of Twin



Rocks.  At the time of inspection, there was no drainage from



the mine openings or from the refuse area.  Several drift mine



openings and two surface mines were located on Coalpit Run,  a



tributary which joins the South Branch in Twin Rocks.   Mine  No.




5079 discharged an acid load of 227 Ib/day to the headwaters of



Coalpit Run.  An additional load of 3H Ib/day was discharged to



the tributary by the refuse pile (No. 5080) associated with  this



drift mine.   Downstream of these discharges, an abandoned surface



mine (No. 5082) contributed an acid load of 159 Ib/day.




     The Twin Rocks Mine of the Johnstown Coal and Coke Company



was located near the lower reach of Coalpit Run,  At the time of



sampling, this active mine (No. 5009) had an alkaline discharge.

-------
It has been reported that this mine is now sealed and abandoned.






Vintondale area






     A series of drift openings and several surface mines were



located along both banks of the South Branch in the vicinity of




Vintondale.  Mine No. k^kz was the only active operation.   This



mine was operated by the Yinton Coal Company.  An acid load of



1,827 Ib/day was discharged by this mine.   However, according to




the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources,  the opera-



tors are not responsible for the acid discharge and, therefore, not



required to supply treatment.



     Stream sampling conducted coincident with the mine drainage



survey showed that South Branch Blacklick Creek near the mouth



carried an acid load ranging from 7.5 tons per day (low flow con-



ditions) to 82 tons per day (high flow conditions).






              BIACKLICK CREEK, BEIDW VINTONDALE





     A large refuse pile is located adjacent to Blacklick Creek



approximately 0.3 mile below the confluence of the North and



South Branches of Blacklick Creek at Vintondale.  Two open shaft



entries and one sealed slope entry were located within the refuse




area.  It was reported that this mine closed in 1929-  Two small



hillside springs and one small unnamed tributary are directed



across this large refuse dump before entering Blacklick Creek.
                             1U8

-------
As a result, these drainages are affected by the waste material.




These sources (No.'s UyUS, kjkk, and V7^5) carried a combined



acid load of 962 Ib/day At the points where they entered Black-



lick Creek.  A much larger tributary is also diverted through



the refuse dump near the downstream limit of the refuse pile.



The acid load measured near the mouth of this tributary ranged



from 219 Ib/day to 63? Ib/day (No. U9?6, Table 19).



     Two additional open shaft entries, reportedly interconnected



with the openings mentioned above, were found in the abandoned



mining community of Wehrum.  A sixth opening, also reported as



interconnected, is located approximately 0.6 mile downstream of



Wehrum.  At this site, a 1,020 gpm artesian effluent was dis-



charged to Ramsey Run, a direct tributary of Blacklick Creek.



This shaft (Mine No. b7h6) contributed an acid load in excess of



5.5 tons per day to the receiving stream.






Rummel Run






     A total of four surface mines and lU drift mine openings



were located within the Rummel Run drainage area.  Mine No. U851



was a small active drift mine operated by the B. & J. Coal Co.



A negligible acid load was discharged by the mine.  The operator



is not responsible for the discharge and the Department of En-



vironmental Resources does not require treatment of the discharge.
                            1U9

-------
     .The major portion of the mine drainage discharged to Rummel Run



resulted from an area which has been mined by both surface and under-



ground methods. A total of four effluents were located at this site



(No. U853, W5U, H855, W56).  The combined acid load from this com-



plex was 718 Ib/day.





Mardis Run



     Five surface mines and two abandoned drift mines were located



within the Mardis Run drainage area.  All of these operations were



dry.





Blacklick Creek, Dilltown to Bias - Southbank




     This area has been extensively mined by both surface and under-



ground mining methods.  The majority of the mines are located ad-



jacent to the main stem of Blacklick Creek.



     Two caved mine openings were located along the south bank of



Blacklick Creek west of Dilltown.  Mine No. U857 contributed an acid



discharge of 1,138 Ib/day and Mine No. ^858 discharged a load of



nearly 19 tons per day.  The original opening at Mine No, 1*858 has



been sealed; however, the 960 gpm effluent has broken through the



hillside adjacent to the seal.  This drainage cascades over a 20



foot embankment into Blacklick Creek.



     One abandoned mine discharge and two refuse pile discharges



were located along the south bank of this portion of Blacklick Creek.
                            150

-------
.Mine No.  1*859 discharged to Mardis Run.   The discharge is artesian



 and probably results from a point of breakthrough from one of the



 nearby underground mines. .The acid load was l,lUl Ib/day.   The



 two refuse pile discharges (No.'s 1*860,  1+861) contributed an ad-



 ditional acid load of 150 Ib/day.



    Two active underground mine operations were located along this



 section of Blacklick Creek.   They were the Bias Mine of the Armaugh



 Coal Company and the Blacklick Mine of the Florence Mining Company.



 Neither mine was discharging at the time of inspection.   It has



 been reported that these mines are now interconnected with other



 Florence Mining Company operations located along the Conemaugh



 River near the new Conemaugh River power plant.






 Blacklick Creek, Dilltown to Dias - Northbank



      Mine No.  1*71*8 contributed an effluent of 60 gpm to a small



 unnamed tributary of Blacklick Creek just below Dilltown.   There



 were actually two openings at this site.   One was caved and dry



 while the second opening discharged the  60 gpm effluent.  The acid



 load was Ul8 Ib/day.



      A total of five discharge points  were recorded along a 1.5



 mile contour surface mine located adjacent to Mine No. 1*7^8.   Sev-



 eral drift mine openings were located  within this surface mined



 area.   The five discharge points  resulted from old mine openings as



 well as from surface impoundments adjacent to the highwall.   The com-



 bined acid load from these sources (No.'s 1*870,  1*871,  1*872,  1*873, and



 WO  was 395 Ib/day.
                            151

-------
     There were five additional surface mines downstream of the area



described above.  Several minor acid discharges were recorded from



cumulative seepage vhlch occurred at the "base of the spoil piles.



Four major sources of acid discharge were also associated with these



surface mines.  These were Mine No.'s 11863, 1*366, 4868 and 4869.  The



combined acid load was 6,651 Ib/day.



     An underground mine was under development near the headwaters of



the unnamed tributary on which the mines described above are located.



This mine had not begun production at the time of inspection.  This



mine is now operated by the Oneida Mining Company and produces an



alkaline discharge.





Blacklick Creek, Dias to Heshbon - Southbank





     Eleven drift mine openings and three surface mines were located



along the south bank of Blacklick Creek in the Dias to Heshbon area.



Only four of these mines were discharging and the acid loads were



minor.  The only major source of mine drainage pollution (No. 5571)



was contributed by drainage from an abandoned mine refuse dump located



on Ramsey Run.  The 12 gpm effluent from the mine dump area carried



an acid load of 4,709 Ib/day.  The acidity concentration of this highly



mineralized effluent was 32,700 mg/1.



     Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Ramsey Run coincident



with source investigation.  At this time Ramsey Run discharged an



acid load ranging from 1,122 Ib/day to 7>9^0 Ib/day to Blacklick Creek



(Table 19).
                             152

-------
Blacklick Creek, Dias to Heshbon - Northbank




     An active coal preparation plant was located on the north bank




of Blacklick Creek immediately vest of Route 56 at Dias.  This faci-



lity served the numerous active mine operations in the surrounding



area.  An abandoned surface mine is located on the hillside immedi-



ately above the preparation plant.  Almost the entire area of the



surface mine has been filled with waste material from the plant.



Water discharged by the surface mine, possibly from underground




origin, passes around and through the somewhat compacted material.



The acid loads carried by'these effluents (No.'s k&fQ and 1*879)



were 115 Ib/day and 6U8 Ib/day, respectively.



     Mine No. ^889 contributed the only remaining significant acid



discharge in the Dias to Heshbon area.  The two caved openings to



this mine are located on the bank of Blacklick Creek east of Hesh-



bon.  The measured effluent was hO gpm which carried an acid load



of 360 Ib/day.






Blacklick Creek, Heshbon to Josephine - Southbank




     This portion of the Blacklick Creek drainage area has been ex-



tensively mined by both surface and underground mining methods.   Sur-



face mines have disturbed several hundred acres and many of these



sites are associated with drift mines.  Forty-four of the mines had



measurable discharges at the time of the inventory.   However,  only



Mine Wo.'s ^836, 5018 and 5026 contributed significant acid discharges.



     Mine No. ^836 is located near the headwaters of a small unnamed



tributary of Blacklick Creek.  At the time of survey, the 85 gpm  effluent
                             153

-------
from'this mine represented the entire flow of the tributary.  The



acid load was 5^1 Ib/day.



     A 250 gpm effluent was measured at the base of the slumped drift



opening at Mine No. 5018.  This opening is one of several situated



along both banks of the small receiving tributary.  The acid load



was 1,170 Ib/day.



     Mine No. 5026 discharged an acid load of 3,^67 Ib/day to an



unnamed tributary.  There are four other drift mine openings in the



immediate area, all of which contributed additional acid discharges.





Blacklick Creek, Heshbon to Josephine-Northbank





     The major mining activity in this area is centered around Aulds



Run, a tributary to Blacklick Creek.  The largest acid load found in



this area was discharged by the abandoned L.C.S. Collieries Virginia



No. Ik Mine.  The effluent was ^05 gpm which carried an acid load of



nearly 5 tons per day (Mine No. if-890).  An acitve drift mine operated



by the Sunny Creek Coal Company was located along the west side of



Aulds Run.  The kO gpm effluent from this operation underwent lime



neutralization and settlement prior to discharge to Aulds Run.  At



the time of sampling the Sunny Creek Mine (No. 1*895) discharged a



negligable acid load.



     Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Aulds Run coincident



with the source investigation.  At this time Aulds Run discharged an



acid load ranging from 3-5 tons per day to 6.2 tons per day to Blacklick



Creek (Table 19).

-------
     A coal preparation plant is located along the north bank of




Blacklick Creek near the mouth of Aulds Run.  Waste material from



this plant is trucked to the unreclaimed strip mine cuts on the



hillside overlooking Blacklick Creek.  These surface mines have



also intersected underground workings from the Virginia No. lU Mine



mentioned above.  Drainage from the underground workings and/or the




surface mines percolate through the waste material deposited in the



pits.  Highly mineralized seepage areas occurred in many areas even



after the previously unreclaimed strip mine spoil piles were back-



filled over the pyritic materials.  As a result, it is quite diffi-



cult to determine the original origin of some of the effluents sampled



during the study.  The largest of these discharges was No. kQ$8 which




carried an acid load of 5,220 Ib/day.  Another three gpm effluent from



a refuse filled strip pit had an acidity concentration of 6l,250 mg/1




with an acid load of 2,205 Ib/day (No. U897).



     Mine No. U922 discharged an acid load of 719 Ib/day to Laurel



Run, a tributary to Blacklick Creek downstream of Aulds Run.   This



sealed mine is located at the headwaters of the tributary.  Surface



and underground mine openings were located along both banks of



Laurel Run immediately below Mine No. U922.  However, these mines con-



tributed only minor acid loads.  The largest acid load in the Laurel



Run drainage area resulted from a borehole discharge of the Virginia



No. 20 Mine operated by Crichton Coal and Coke.  A 1,710 gpm effluent



from this mine discharged an acid load of 2,565 Ib/day to Laurel Run.



This mine is presently reported as inactive.  The status of the dis-



charge is unknown.

-------
     Laurel Run received two additional mine drainage discharges from



a large surface mined area on the north bank of the tributary.   These



were discharge Ho.'s 5015 and 5016 with acid loads of 19^ Ib/day and



961 Ib/day, respectively.



     The active Josephine Mine of the Willowbrook Coal Company was



the last downstream operation in the area of north bank Blacklick



Creek from Heshbon to Josephine.  During the survey period, the



450 gpm effluent from the Josephine Mine received inadequate treat-



ment.  The acid load at this time was 1,863 Ib/day (Mine Mo. 5152).



Upgraded treatment facilities have been installed but the present



status of the effluent is unknown.





Blacklick Creek. Josephine to Mouth -South Bank



     The last area of mining activity on the south side of Blacklick



Creek occurred along several unnamed tributaries northwest of the



junction of Routes 22 and 119.  A total of lU discharging mine sites



were located in this small area.  The total source acid load was more



than 2,500 Ib/day.  The 65 gpm effluent from Mine Ho. 1*910 discharged



l,UVf Ib/day of the 2,500 Ib/day total load.





Blacklick Creek, Josephine to Mouth - North Bank



     Coal mining operations on the north side of Blacklick Creek were



confined to Muddy Run and an unnamed tributary adjacent to Muddy Run.



A total of lU drift mine openings were found in these two areas.  Five



of these were discharging at the time of Inspection.  The combined



acid load was 262 Ib/day.  Mine Ho. 1*273 discharged 118 Ib/day of this



262 Ib/day total source acid load.
                                156

-------
Active Mines



     Daring the course of the field inventory, a total of Ik dis-



charges from active nines were sampled in the Blacklick Creek



drainage area.  Updated information (1971), supplied by the Penn-



sylvania Department of Environmental Resources, indicated that



treatment facilities are presently in operation at all but one



active discharge site in the watershed.  The one exception is the



Bethlehem Mines Corporation Nanty Glo Ho. 31 Mine.  However, treat-



ment facilities are under construction at this time.



     Two discharges were associated with the Virginia No. 20 Mine



operated by Crichton Coal and Coke.  These were discharge Ho.'s U^Ul



and U98l.  Nearly the entire 2,573 lb/day acid load was contributed



by No. 1*981.  This mine is reportedly closed and the present status



of the discharges is unknown.



     Mine No. 5009 operated by the Johnstown Coal and Coke Company



has closed since the date of inventory.  The mine is now abandoned and



sealed.



     Mine No. 1*5^2 is a drift mine operated by the Vinton Coal Company.



This mine discharged an acid load of 1,827 lb/day at the time of survey.



However, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports



that this mine operates in previously abandoned workings and, provided



no increase in pollutional load occurs, is not required to supply treat-



ment.  Mine No. U831 is also exempted from supplying treatment.  The



acid load from this mine at the time of survey was negligible (51b/day).
                                157

-------
     A total of 161 discharging sources and approximately 1,675  acres



of surface mined area were investigated during this study.   Table 20



presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading



(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams in



the Blacklick Creek study area.  Table 21 presents a sunmary of  flow



volumes and chemical loading by source type for the l6l discharging



sources inventoried during the study.
                              158

-------



















B
cd

4J
CO

oo
C T3
T2.S
•H CO
Q) (-1
U (U
24J
cd
O >N
CM Xl r^
0)
W CO 0)
tJ 60 J-l
M CO
3 £
H "O .M
SO
•H
r-l r-l
y/
CO O
bO cd

C ^
•H
cd
rl
0)
C

•S

















•H -9
E*l ^v


4J Ct
cd *C
MH ^
r-l XI
3 1-1
CO ^



CO x->
r-l CO >
cd 
•H cd
r~f *T3 *C
Cd VI •*>
•U O XI
O «C i-l
H ^


0)
bO
•-« fco
cd cd B
•u xi O
o o H
H co v-'
•H
Q
H-l CO
O 
•rl
0)
U
s
CM oo CM o r*»
in >* r-l r-l «*
,





in *^ ^^ *d* in
\o o
r-l r-l

CO CO -* CO CM
r*- co ON
CM VO

m 1-4






co co oo C"*N ^^
ON in CSI vo 00

ft ft ft
CM O i-l
vO CM





r-i r^ in co o
00 ON CO vO O
o i-i co CM m
ft «
o *^*
rH




r»» oo h» !"» vo
CM CO <* r-t 00
vO O CM CM t^.
ft ft
m vo
«* r-l






m co o CM vo
Io m CM co
ft ft
CM CM





m r^ *^ vo r^*
CM in


O  & t3
OO OONQ 00 CO CM ONcOf^^TvDCM vO 00
i-ION CM1? 00 CO 00 ON COr-l i— i oo m •d'^' r~> oo
f^O d'«d'ONCo
r-i i— i i— i r^ *^* i— i i— i r^
CM





ONCM CMCOON vo v 3 i-l |4 i-l r-t to ±> Q) 3 O
0)tl!X(l>ia*rl 0) T) Q) g UV4JU P-i I-l 0) CUr-l CO
B 3 « B B."O wB'-i6BxlcdB3cdx! u.MxJS'-' J
SCdCOnJcdr-4tt}cd3cd34Jr-ICdOi-HCOi-l OOCd*H 
-------
        FIGURE  13
•m    BLACKUCK  CREEK
      MINE  LOCATION,1 MAP

-------

























0)
(X
4J
0)
o -d

3 tfj
O CO
CO I-l
(U
>-. 4J
xt m

CO
00 ^
(3 CU
•H 0)
-d i>
td o
o
f— 1 _i(J
u
0) v4
60r-4
a-s
•H td
n) I-H
P pq
•d
S
s































i?
C n)
•H -d
1 x7
rH iH
< ^

CU *~.
CQ >•
84
td ^v

C .-H
!~


C
O /->

H n)
r-4 "V,
td *^
4J i-H
O ^
EH



Q) *->
3.3
r-4 *v.
3 X)
01 i-4





CO s-\
ta >
i-H Q) Jtf
n) C *d
4J TJ ^
0 IH XI

ffi ^™"'




4J *-»
•s w td
•H "d

cd «H xi
•U CJ i-H
O <• N>
H


0)
00

cd Si g

O 0 (X
H in >_<
•H
Q


m co
O 0)
y
Jj


Z OJ






CU
Q-<
Es
ource T
C/l

O CO CM ON
i-H r-4 CO m
^






co CM os r*
m CM co m
CM





i-H
r** in vo vo
m CM CM ON
«* CM >* •>
» "CM
ON i-H





in Is* ON vO
*^ ' *I^ i-H *^/
co • co r^ r^*

CM vO VD CO
00 »-H






m ON vo co
o co co r^
CM r^ o t^
•* *» •* •»
CO CM CM i-H
i-H






VO CM 00 i-H
•* 0 -* 0
^*J ^^ ^T ^O
M * A ft
I-H co m co
\o «-<





O i-l CM CO
r-i co co in
Is** px. i-^ CD
M ** *»
CO i-H i-H







•**t CUC O C
CO CO) CO v4O
d"? 5J1* £"2 4J'S
£s s^ 2s s§
4J XI 4J U O 1H
•H •-"
II ,_l
U O
cd cd
m
0)
r4. jj
1
e
» 4J
>s cd
0) CU
^ ^
H U
3
W <4H
O
00
VO C
ON O
rH »fH
•y
%
O i-H
i-H JJ
c
h Cd
aramete
ignific
PH a
*
163

-------
                        POLLUTION ABATEMENT






     As shown in Table 21,  active shaft mines  were the  principal  pollution



sources within the Blacklick Creek drainage area.   The  273,073  Ib/day



acid load shown in the table reflects the mine drainage conditions  found



during the 1968 survey.  The contribution from active shaft  or  slope



mines represents nearly one half of the total  source acid load  measured



at all l6l mine discharge points (Table 21).



     A more realistic estimation of the mine drainage problem in  the



Blacklick Creek area may be obtained by deleting the contribution from



all active sources (shaft or slope mines and drift mines).   The contribu-



tion from active mines has been significantly  reduced  by the installation



of treatment facilities at many of the mines.   Completion of treatment



facilities at any mine not presently providing treatment, coupled with



adequate state regulatory control should reduce to a minimum the  unabated



mine drainage contribution from active sites in the Blacklick Creek



watershed.



     For discussion purposes only the total source acid load from abandoned



mine sites will be considered.  The abandoned  source acid load  at  the



time of survey was 138,62U Ib/day (Table 21, total source acid  load less



active acid load).




     Based on the initial field survey sampling program, l8 of  the  total



l6l discharging sites contributed about 90 percent of the total acid load



from abandoned mines measured in the study area.  These sources included



seven drift mines, four refuse pile areas, three strip  mines, two



combination surface-underground mines, and one shaft mine.  The combined



acid load discharged by these 18 sites was 125,120 Ib/day.






                            16U

-------
     Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement program



in Blacklick Creek should include the 18 sources mentioned above.



Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites would be expected



to contribute significant acid discharges.  Detailed engineering



studies and mine effluent sampling conducted during an entire water



year would more accurately characterize the relative contribution of



each source, JDue to the magnitude of each discharge, it would be



expected that even when considered over a longer time period, each



site would remain a Major contributor.  However, long term repeti-



tive water quality determinations may necessitate the consideration



of additional sourcet located elsewhere in the basin.



     The 18 principal sources (listed in Table 22) located during



this initial survey provide a relative indication as to where the



major mine drainage problems occur in the Blacklick Creek watershed.



Until such a time when additional study can provide a more detailed



assessment of the problem, these 18 sources can effectively serve



as the first phase or priority in a program of drainage source abate-



ment in the Blacklick Creek watershed.  Once drainage control has been



established at the principal source sites, the abatement program could



be expanded to include additional discharge points.



     The following is a description of the 18 principal sources.   A



listing of these sources is shown in Table 22.  The locations of



these mine sites are shown in Figure lU.  In the Blacklick Creek



watershed, all sites which contributed an acid load exceeding



900 Ib/day are considered as principal sources.
                            165

-------

























0}
fl)
O
H TJ
p fl)
O pd
to to
d) d>
co ts
C !>
OJ -rl
OJ co M
prl »Q fll
n *
t— 1 H
pq 
0)
o
0)
PS



..
in .0
T) H
o
«al H

g)
"




0)
0
o d
•H CO
•rl O
O P
p, d
co o
o

*
I-N

O 0
r— | Q|
(x, S


0)
d
s
VH
o
«
^

0) •
fl !Z
A
it M ^ ^ j^ ^
o o o o o u
PS OOO P §OOO
•H -H -H PS PS -H -H iH
^% rS rH rH rH ( — 1 i — 1 rH
0) Mr^^j CQ MAir^rM O
w ooo -a -dooo
B cococo r-f rHcOcdco pi4
a HHH P pHHH 0
PS pq CQ cq <; <;pqpqpq .H
Jbj O J^ r&4 OOO O »M O O O O O .^
CU-PCUO) -P -P -P -PCU-P-P-P-P-PO
0) 0) 0) . Q) CO
^4 ^* h ^ f^ *^ f^ O J^ O O C^ O O |— f

^ ^J rJij ^4 pS 4^ 40 4-> d -P p!xj -P -P -P 

ooiAirvoooiAoir\o VO OJ CO \O CO ON 00 ON U"N O l/N O IfN ON CO l/N t/NONHOJIArHOJUNOOOJOCOOOlAH HCOHHrHHOJOHONH U) OJ VO OJ 8OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOlTvOOOOOOOO VOCOOlTNOl/NOt— OOOOl/NJ--*VOO HOJPOI-JJ-OOVOOO-*ONOJOOJHHCO 00 OJ -=tVOOJOO-=frOOt— OJUNOOOJHt— OJOOC— rooo_a-oocooooo^ojojoJOJOJOJOJOj l/NOOOOOOOUNl/NOOir\UNOOO OOOJOOVOVOOOOJONO HVOlfNJ-OO H O ON H H J* OJ ITN-* H tu cy a, cu d d d 0 tU iM !S tM co d d d d g.(H'i.H'd'»H'iri^!5^ PSWQQQCJQUOCQCQOOQQP3 UNVOt— 00 ONVOOO ONOOOt~-OO OOOVO I— ^f-a-l/NlfNlAVOVOSPONONONONHHOJCO t— t-oooooocoeococooococo ONO o o -3* -3* -^* ^ •& *zt ^ ^3" Jy1 *zt -& -^ ^ l/N l/N l/N • £4 o 0 •H O 2 -P O co ^^ Ort •H W 4^ ,f3 O g 3 l] OO ° OJ o o CO r-T OJ O O OO 3 O\ H 00 0) H •H PH 2 ^ P? VO 0 I/N rt 3 PS s? 1 ON O t- -* O O t~^ 04 00 O 0 O l/N H VO OJ OJ H 0) H •H PH 3


-------
                                   SOURCES




Site No.
     The origin of this acid discharge is not a mine site.   At this



location) a small unnamed tributary is diverted around and through



an extensive mine refuse area prior to entering Blacklick Creek.



In addition to the 90? Ib/day acid load contributed at this site,



there are similar discharges along the entire length of the refuse



area which lies adjacent to Blacklick Creek.





Mine No.
     The abandoned shaft mine discharge is located approximately 0.6



mile downstream of the abandoned mining community of Wehrum.   The



discharge point is the sixth shaft opening in a series of reportedly



interconnected shaft mines along Blacklick Creek from Vintondale to



the Wehrum area.  All five upstream openings were dry.  The discharge



from Mine No. kjk6 was 1,020 gpm and carried an acid load of 11,322



Ib/day.  Three of the five additional entries are located in the



vicinity of the large refuse pile downstream of Vintondale and the



remaining two entries are located in Wehrum.





Mine No.
     An 80 gpm effluent was measured at the base of the slumped



drift opening to Mine No. 1*857.  A contour surface mine is located im-



mediately adjacent to the opening but has not intersected the face of



the portal.
                               16?

-------
However-, this surface mine has intersected and partially destroyed



or covered several additional underground mine openings which



probably interconnect with Mine No. ^857.  The acid load discharged



to Blacklick Creek by Mine No. U857 was 1,138 Ib/day.





Mine No. U858




     This mine opening is located approximately 650 yards downstream



of Mine No. ^857 at the same elevation along the southbank of Black-



lick Creek.  The original opening of Mine No. U858 had been sealed.



However, the 960 gpm effluent has broken through the hillside adjacent



to the seal.  The drainage cascades over a 20 foot embankment into



Blacklick Creek.  The acid load contributed by Mine No. 1*858 was



37,555 Ib/day.





Mine No. U859




     This mine is located approximately 0.5 mile above the mouth of



Mardlis Run.  Contour surface mines and drift mines are situated



along both banks of Marldis Run in the vicinity of the No. U859 dis-



charge.  The effluent is artesian and probably results from a point



of breakthrough from one of the ambient mines.  The acid load was



1,11*1 Ib/day.




Mine No. W366




     Mine No. k&66 contributed an effluent of 180 gpm which carried



an acid load of 2,570 Ib/day.  Several drift mine openings are located



in the highwall of this contour surface mine.  Heavy rainfall and high



flow conditions at the time of sampling were partly attributable for




the large volume of discharge (180 gpm).
                              168

-------
CONCUAUSH RIVl
                           FIGURE  14
                         BLACKUCK CREEK
                   PRINCIPAL  SOURCE LOCATION MAP

-------
Mine No. ^868






     The 120 gpra effluent measured at this mine flows from the base of



a slumped drift opening located at the edge of a contour surface mine.



When in operation, the surface mine approached the underground opening



as close as possible without actually disturbing the old entry.  The




acid load discharged to the unnamed Blacklick Creek tributary was 1,8^3



Ib/day.






Mine No. U869





     This mine is the old Virginia No. 15 operated by the Standards



Bituminous Coal Company.  Mine operation was initiated in 1919-  Two



of the openings to the mine are still identifiable, an air shaft and



a portal.  Both opening* have been intersected by a surface mine which



terminated at this location.  The air shaft was dry, however, a 90 gpm



effluent discharged from the second opening.  The acid load was 1,722



Ib/day.






Mine No. 1*890






     Portions of the original concrete portal still remain at this



site.  This was the Virginia No. Ik mine originally opened in 1929



by the Standard Bituminous Coal Company.  The mine was reportedly in



operation until at least 1952 and the working covered approximately



860 acres (13).  At the time of inspection a 1*05 gpm effluent drained



from the still intact and open portal.  The acid load discharged to



Aulds Run was 9,987 Ib/day,
                             171

-------
Mine No. U893



     At this site a 5 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage  was


collected from the base of a spoil pile area associated with a  surface


mine.  A portion of the disturbed surface area has been filled  with waste


material from a nearby active coal preparation plant.   Percolation  of


surface  water through this waste material results in numerous  immeasurable


seepage areas along the length of the surface mine.  The 5 gpra  cumulative

sample represented only a portion of the total drainage.  The acidity


concentration of the drainage was 20,000 mg/1 and the acid load was


1,200 Ib/day.



Mine No. U897



     This surface m;ne has also been filled with waste material from


a coal preparation plant.  There were numerous discharges of highly


mineralized effluent along the entire length of those portion  of

the disturbed area filled with refuse.  A single representative sample

of only 3 gpm carried an acid load of 2,205 Ib/day.  The acidity


concentration was 6l,250 mg/1.  As a result of the immeasurable seepage

areas the total load contribution from this site could not accurately

be determined.



Mine No. U898
                                                                  »


     This area has been surface mined, drift mined, and then portions

of the  surface mine have been filled with refuse from an active coal

preparation plant.  A portion of the originally unreclaimed surface


mine spoil piles have been backfilled to cover the refuse material.
                            172

-------
However, there were numerous areas of seepage about the base of the



regraded; spoil piles.  A 15 gpm effluent, which represented the major



discharge point, carried an acid load of 5,220  Ib/day.






Mine
     The 65 gpm effluent from Mine No.  ^910 flows from an area which




has been mined by both surface and underground methods.   The l,HUy



Ib/day acid load is the largest discharge from a series of mines



located along several small unnamed tributaries of Blacklick Creek.






Mine Ho. 5018






     Mine No. 5018 is located along a small unnamed tributary to Black-



lick Creek near the community of Josephine.   The mine portal has caved



and the 250 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slump area.  The



acid load discharged to the receiving tributary was 1,170 Ib/day.






Mine No. 5026






     Mine No. 5026 is located along a small unnamed tributary to Black-



lick Creek near the community of Josephine.   The mine portal has caved



and the 5^0 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slump area.



The acid load discharged to the recieving tributary was 3,^6? Ib/day.






Site No. 5037






     Near the community of Nanty Glo a large mine refuse dump is located



adjacent to an unnamed Blacklick Creek tributary.  As a result of surface



water percolation through the pile there was considerable seepage along
                            173

-------
the base of the dump.   The cumulative result of this seepage was the



total water quality degradation of the tributary.  At the lower end



of the refuse area the tributary carried an acid load of 35,^2^ Ib/day.






Site No. 5076





     The source of this acid discharge was another large refuse dump



in the Nanty Glo area.  It appears that a small spring may have been



covered by the dump.  At the point where the drainage emerges  from the



pile an 8 gpm flow was recorded.'  The acid load was  2,093 Ib/day.





Site No. 3571





     The source of this acid discharge was an abandoned mine refuse



dump on Ramsey Run.  The 12 gpm effluent from the dump area carried an



acid load of ^,709 Ib/day.  The acidity concentration of the highly



mineralized effluent was 32,700 mg/1.

-------
    TWO IICK CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
         175

-------
                       TWO LICK CREEK




                   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS






1.  Two Lick Creek drains an area of 190 square miles  in Indiana



    County.  The water quality of main stem Two Lick Creek is  con-



    tinuously polluted along its entire length as a result of  coal



    mine discharges.   This degraded water quality condition ex-



    tends above the community of Wandia Junction along the entire



    length of the North Branch.  The South Branch is the only



    major tributary in the watershed unaffected by coal mine



    drainage.
2.  A total of Ijb discharging sources and approximately 2,800



    acres of surface mined land were investigated in the study



    area.  Discharges from coal mine sources ranged from one to



    985 gpm and totalled 10.2 million gallons per day (jngd).



    The total net acid load discharged by these sources was



    36,6U5 lb/day.





3.  Active mines were not a significant source of mine drainage



    pollution in the Two Lick Creek watershed.  The net load from



    all active sites in the watershed was alkaline (508 lb/day).






U.  Abandoned drift mines, shaft mines, and mine refuse piles were



    the major sources of mine drainage pollution in the study area.



    These three source types contributed an acid load of 30,858 lb/



    day.  This load represented approximately 85 percent of the



    acid load discharged by all Yfk sources in the Two Lick Creek



    watershed.
                            176

-------
5.  A total of twelve principal sources of mine drainage dis-



    charge  were located in the study area.  These sources in-



    clude six drift mines, three combination mines, tvo mine



    refuse dumps, and one shaft mine.  These twelve sources



    discharged a total acid load of 29,lUU Ib/day.  This load



    represents approximately 80 percent of the total acid load



    measured in the watershed.





                     DESCRIPTION OF AREA





    Two Lick Creek drains an area of 190 square miles in Indiana



County.  The tributary arises in the east central corner of the



county and flows generally southwest toward the confluence with



Blacklick Creek near the community of Josephine.



    The principal tributary to Two Lick Creek is Yellow Creek.



This tributary drains an area of 67 square miles or about one-



third of the total Two Lick Creek watershed.



    Coal mine operations in the Two Lick Creek area are extensive



in nearly all portions of the watershed.  The only area in the



watershed where mines were noticeably absent was the 22 square



mile area of the South Branch.



    The majority of discharging mine sites in the Yellow Creek



drainage area were confined to that area below the Homer City



water supply reservoir.   A few sites are located immediately



above the reservoir and one additional area of mining activity



was located near the headwaters of Little Yellow Creek in the



vicinity of Heilwood.
                           177

-------
                    STREAM WATER QUALITY






     The water quality of main stem Two Lick Creek is continuously



polluted along its entire length as a result of coal mine discharges.



This degraded water quality condition also extends above the community



of Wandin Junction along the entire length of North Branch Two Lick



Creek.  The South Branch of Two Lick is unaffected by mine drainage.



     The quantity and quality of the mine discharges were such



that the stream water quality was continuously degraded.  There




was no point along the main stem where the water quality of Two



Lick Creek was improved by alkaline tributary inflow or by dilution



and neutralization of the upstream discharges.



     During the course of the 1968 field study, several stream lo-



cations were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 23).  These sta-



tions were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine




drainage.  A summary of this  stream data is presented in Table 2U.



The locations of the sampling points are shown in Figure 15.





                  SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE





     An estimated UOO raining sites and approximately 2800 acres of



surface mined land were investigated during the Two Lick Creek



study.  Samples for chemical analysis were collected from I?1* sources



discharging at the time of  survey.  The total effluent from these



sources was more than 10 million gallons per day  (mgd).  The total



net acid load discharged to streams in the Two Lick Creek watershed




was 36,6U5 Ib/day.
                            178

-------
Station
Number
                                        TABLE 23

                        Stream water quality sampling Stations

                                    Two Lick Creek
Sampling Period
Stream
Location
 4747       May, Oct., 1968

 4778       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4779       May, Oct., 1968

 4780       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4781       May, June, Oct. 1968


 4782       May, Oct. 1968

 4783       May, June 1968
            Feb. 1969

 4784       May, June 1968
            Feb. 1969

 4785       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4786       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4787       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4788       May, June, Oct. 1968

 4789       May, June 1968

 4790       May, June 1968

 4792       May, 1968

 4984       June, 1968
                        Tearing Run

                        Yellow Creek

                        Yellow Creek

                        Little Yellow Creek

                        Yellow Creek


                        Little Yellow Creek

                        Two Lick Creek


                        Perm Run


                        Dixon Run

                        Buck Run

                        North Branch Two Lick Creek

                        South Branch Two Lick Creek

                        Unnamed trib to Yellow Creek

                        Unnamed trib to Yellow Creek

                        Two Lick Creek

                        Two Lick Creek
                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            at USGS Gage

                            near mouth

                            just above mouth of
                            Little Yellow Creek

                            at Route 422

                            just above mouth


                            near mouth


                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth

                            near mouth
                                        179

-------
tf
0 •£
B
r
g
>s
nganese
1 lb/di
>
c%
M r-
flj
4-1 i-H

m
25
oj
MH
rH
3 rH
W "-x
g
>
*< S
*l
•s
rH 0
fa at


•H
&2
4 B
VI C
C
O
•H
4J
4 •
W 55
Si -4 CM
in 00 

oo cn -*
cn so m
rH en
f"^ CO P"*
r-4
CM 

"2
*t »*L
CM  O\ Cjv

oo so m
X c u
338
00 CO CO

in ^* s0

O rH rH
CM m r-t

000
SO rH O
r-l
O O O
in ON oo
m O m
 so in
CM
0) *
X C X)

O CM CM
sO sD in
cn m ^d•
m co ON
CM CM
sD »tf CO
CM r*- in
CM I-H cn
cn ON cn
sD in CM
r^ in cn
o o in
oo in CM
§O O
O 0
i-H CM CM
cn CM CM
in co O
ON fn CM
sO *O so

rH
-X C 4J
338
sO sD sO
00 CO CO

in o in
so en co

cn -tf m
o sr r^-


rH CO
in CM ON


CM SD so
rH CM
O O O
co m in
CM CM »d-
O m ON


i-H OS OO
cn CM
in in O
cn CM so
m m o
m '•» t-v

-------
   Sv
<_n ro  _
4> -P-  O
O O  O
       T
           «~  ^
           !§•!?
           !o  H.
  i LO CTs

  > CO £-
               OQ
                (U
            e-  3

-------
                                                                LEGEND

                                                             STMAM WATCH OUAUTY
                                                             SAMSUNG  LOCATIONS
KACKLIC/r CHfEK,
                FIGURE 15

             TWO LICK CREEK
STREAM  VMVTER QUALITY SAMPLING   LOCATIONS

-------
     A description of the mine drainage sources follows.   All



mine site locations in the Two Lick Creek watershed are shown in



Figure 16.





                       TWO LICK CREEK





North Branch




     Six small surface mines and three underground mine openings



were located at the very headwaters of the fflbrth Branch above



Route 286.  Three of these mines were discharging at the time of



inspection.  These were Mine'No.'s Ul99» ^200, and U?51.   However,



the net load from these sources was alkaline (2 Ib/day).



     In downstream order, the next sources of mine drainage were



located in the immediate vicinity of Commodore.  The largest dis-



charge in the area resulted from the Commodore Mine.  The effluent



was artesian in nature and was measured at 9^5 gpm.   However, the



load from the mine (No. Ul97) was alkaline.  Mine No. ^198 is lo-



cated on the west side of Route 236 and contributed an acid load



of 319 Ib/day.  Mine No. Ul96 was located just north of Commodore



and contributed an acid load of 180 Ib/day.



     Areas of the North Branch between Commodore and the conflu-



ence with the South Branch at Wandin Junction has been extensively



mined.  This activity is most extensive along the west bank.  Small



drift mines and surface mines have been developed in at least two



coal seams which outcrop along the hillsides.  The largest single



source of mine drainage discharge in this area resulted from Mine
                            182

-------
No. Ul?l.  There are two openings at this site and they contributed



a combined effluent of 135 gpm.  The acid load was 350 Ib/day.



Another major source df discharge was contributed by Mine No. Ul86,



a slumped drift mine.  The acid load was 108 Ib/day.



     Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of North Branch



coincident with the source inventory.  During this period, the



stream carried an acid load ranging from 1,7^3 Ib/day to 7,3^8 lb/



day (Station No. ^787, Table 2*0.





South Branch



     At the time of the mine drainage source investigation, coal



mine operations were totally absent in the 21.9 square mile drain-



age area of South Branch,  A stream water quality sampling station



was located at the mouth of the South Branch.   During the sampling



period, the pH of the stream ranged from 7.2 to 7.6.  On two of



the three sampling occasions, the stream carried a net alkalinity .•



concentration.  The one time the stream carried a net acid load



the concentration was only one mg/1.  (Station No. ^788, Table 2U).





Two Lick Creek, Wandin Junction to Buck Run




     A slope mine is located immediately below the confluence of



the North and South Branches at Wandin Junction.  The portal was



still  open but  the mine was completely inundated with water and



there was no drainage.  A negligible acid load was carried by



drainage seeping from the refuse pile associated with the mine.
                            183

-------
     Mine No. Ul65 was located on the north bank of Two Lick



Creek downstream of the small community of Diamondville.  The



upstream opening contributed a discharge of 310 gpm which car-



ried an acid load of 3»27^ Ib/day.  A second opening was dry.



A contour surface mine is located approximately 100 vertical



feet above Mine No. kl6*j.  This surface mine parallels Two



Lick Creek for approximately 0.5 mile and then runs along an



unnamed tributary to the main stem.  A total of four discharge



points were found in the area disturbed by the mine.  The com-



bined acid load from these discharges (No.'s ^160, Ul6l, Ul62,



U16U) was 258 Ib/day.



     The Cherryhill No. 3.Mine operated by the Imperial Coal



Company was located on main stem Two Lick Creek directly across



from Mine No. Ul65 described above.  The mine was not active at



the time of inspection.  Drainage from the mine was channeled to



a series of recently constructed settling ponds.  There was no



drainage from the ponds to Two Lick Creek.  At present time  (1971)



the mine has been closed and according to Commonwealth records,



produces an acid effluent which drains to Two Lick Creek.



     Mine No. Ul66 was located on the south bank of Two Lick Creek



near the Clymer Fire Tower.  This mine had apparently been sealed



at one time, but the 50 gpm effluent has broken through to the



surface about 15 feet from the seal.  The acid load discharged to



Two Lick Creek was 2,66U  Ib/day.
                            181*
                              - T,V • -"•- r-t

-------
Buck Run




     Mine No. 1270 is a drift opening located in the base of a



highwall in an unreclaimed surface mine area.  The acid load dis-



charged to the headwaters of Buck Run was 79 Ib/day.  In down-



stream order, the next significant discharge was contributed by



Mine No. Hl5U.  The acid load from this slumped drift opening



was U32 Ib/day.  Mine No. 1273 is located on an unnamed tributary



to Buck Run.  The area has been mined by both surface and under-



ground mining methods.  The 35 gpn» discharge emerges via wooden



drainage pipe from the disturbed area.  The acid load discharged



to the unnamed tributary was 155 Ib/day.



     A contour surface mine is located along the east bank of



Buck Run.  Numerous drift mine openings have been developed in



the base of the existing high-walls.  One of these drift mines



(No. U159) contributed an acid load of 615 Ib/day to Buck Run



     A total of 1^ discharging mine sites were located in the



3.1 square mile drainage area of Buck Run.  These mines contributed



a combined acid load of 1,U35 Ib/day.



     Stream sampling Station No. U786 was located near the mouth



of Buck Run.  The stream was sampled for water quality analysis



during May, June, and October coincident with the mine drainage



source investigations.  During this period, Buck Run exhibited pH



values ranging from 2.6 to 3*3 and carried an acid load ranging



from 3,23^ Ib/day to 15,595 Ib/day (Table 2^).
                            185

-------
Dixon' Run




     The first aourcea of mine drainage discharge in the 10




square mile drainage area of Dixon Run were located at the very



headwaters of the tributary.  The only major discharge resulted



from Mine No. 128U.  At this mine, a 30 gpm effluent was sampled.



This drainage represented cumulative seepage from a surface mined



area.  The acid load discharged to the headwaters of Dixon Run



was 202 Ib/day.  An acid load of 180 Ib/day was measured below a



surface and underground mined area near the community of Idamar.



This was mine No. 1291 and the drainage actually represents a



combination of several effluents.



     The Barr Slope Mine is located on an unnamed tributary to



Dixon Run just downstream from the community of Dixonville.   This



mine was dry at the portal.  A local resident reported that drain-



age from this mine as well as from other underground mines on the



west side of Dixon Run is discharged by the Tanoma borehole.  This



borehole is located on an unnamed tributary to Crooked Creek on the



opposite side of the drainage divide separating Dixon Run and Crooked



Creek.  Crooked Creek is a tributary to the Allegheny River.  During



the field survey, the presence of the Tanoma borehole was verified



but no water quality information was obtained.



     An artesian effluent of 30 gpm was located on the eastside of



Dixon Run south of Dixonville.  The discharge may represent a bore-



hole from one of the mines in a deeper coal seam which does not out-



crop on Dixon Run.  The acid load carried by this discharge (No.



was 20? Ib/day.
                            186

-------
     An active drift mine, operated by the F P & K Coal Company



was in operation on an unnamed tributary to Dixon Run.   At the



time of inspection, this 'mine discharged an alkaline effluent




(Mine No. 1295).



     Both underground and surface mines were located along both



banks of the downstream reach of Dixon Run.  However, these mines




were either dry or contributed only minor acid or alkaline loads.






Two Lick Creek, Dixon Run to Penn Run




     A contour surface mine approximately two miles in length is



located high on the south bank hillside just downstream from the



community of Clymer.  Actually there are two segments to the mine.



The first short section is connected via haul road to the much longer



second section.



     Numerous drift mine openings have been developed in the highwall



of these surface mines.  Most or all of these openings were associ-



ated with the abandoned Cherryhill No. 1 Mine.   Three drainage sources



were located in the first (short) section of the strip mine.  Four



drift openings are located in the highwall of this section.   The por-



tals are still open but have been sealed with cement blocks about 20



feet inside the openings.  Drainage was seeping around the sides of



at least two of these seals.  Each of the three discharges represent



seepage from the drift openings or from the surface mine spoil piles.



The combined acid load from No.'s UyOO, V?01, and U?02 was 17 Ib/day.
                           •187

-------
     A discharge of 105 gp» flowed from the base of a slumped drift



opening immediately adjacent to the beginning of the second segment



of the surface mine described above.  The discharge is via pipe



which extends from the caved mine opening.  This effluent is chan-



neled to two settling ponds and then overflows to Two Lick Creek.



Treatment facilities have obviously been used at one time to treat



this effluent but had since been removed.  There were numerous bags



of unused and spoiled lime remaining at the site.  The acid load



contributed by this source was 1,103 lb/day (No. hjOk).



     Two additional mine openings were located in the base of the



highwall approximately O.b mile from Mine No. VfOU described above.



At least one of these openings had been sealed about UO feet inside



the opening.  Drainage from these two openings contributed an acid



load of 2U4 lb/day (Mine No. U?03).



     Two additional discharges, representing cumulative seepage,



were located along the bottom edge of the strip mine.  These were



No. 's U?05 and 1*706 with a combined acid load of 92 lb/day.



     A large abandoned mine is located along an unnamed tributary



which enters Two Lick Creek on the north bank.  The entry to the



mine was dry.  However, several samples representing cumulative



seepage were collected at the base of the large refuse pile associ-



ated with the mine.  These were discharge No.'s hjlO and Vfll.  A



nine gpm effluent was measured at No. VflO.  The acidity concentra-



tion of this effluent was U5,700 mg/1 and it carried an acid load
                             188

-------
of U,936 Ib/day.  The acid load contributed by No.  kjll was ^56 Ib/day.



     The Dixon Run Coal Company operated a drift mine located along



main stem Two Lick Creek on the bank opposite the confluence of Penn



Run.  The Dixon Run Mine was developed in the base of a strip mine



highwall.  At the time of inspection, this mine contributed an acid



discharge of 1^ Ib/day.  At the present time, it is reported that



the mine has closed.





Penn Run




     The water quality along much of the length of main stem Penn



Run was affected by mine drainage.  Several abandoned surface mines



were located near the headwaters of the tributary.   These operations



were dry.  Three surface mines were active at the time of survey.



These operations were also dry at the time of inspection.  However,



numerous seepage areas were located immediately adjacent to the bank



of Penn Run.  The cumulative effect of these effluents were sufficient



to degrade the water quality of Penn Run.  Surface mine operations



were located on the hillside above the area of these seepage points.



     The Cherryhill No. U Mine was located along the south bank of



Penn Run.  This operation was a drift mine developed in the highwall



of a recently reclaimed surface mine.  The Cherryhill Mine was not



in operation at the time of inspection.  However, a treatment faci-



lity was in operation at the mine.  A 3&0 gpm effluent was lime



treated and aerated over limestone prior to discharge to a settling



pond.  The final effluent discharged to Penn Run carried an alkaline



load of 531 Ib/day. (No. U?l6).
                            189

-------
     Although the treatment facility produced an alkaline discharge,



the effluent carried a total iron concentration of 28.5 mg/1.   As a



result, the effluent was highly discolored and produced a similar



discoloration along the entire downstream reach of Perm Run.



     The Cherryhill No. U Mine has since been closed and sealed.



However, it is reported that the mine produces an acid discharge.



It has also been reported that one section of this mine has been



intersected by auger holes from a nearby surface mine, thus limit-



ing the efiectiveness of the mine seal.



     Stream water quality sampling was conducted at the mouth of



Penn Run coincident with the mine inventory.   During this period,



Perm Run carried an acid load ranging from 960 Ib/day to 6,869 Ib/day



(Table 2U, Station No.
Two Lick Creek, Penn Run to Allen Run




     A hillside contour surface mine approximately one mile in




length is located along main stem Two Lick Creek just downstream



from the mouth of Penn Run.  A drift mine had been operative near



the downstream end of this operation.  This mine was operated by



the Penn Hills Coal Corporation and had been closed just prior to



inspection.  All three portals were still open and each contributed



drainage.  The combined acid load discharged from these three open-




ings (No. 5150) was 53 Ib/day.  The upstream portion of this surface



mine was an extension of the older workings in which the Penn Hills



mine was located.  This newer section had been reclaimed and Penn
                            190

-------
•Hills was in the process of developing a new drift mine.



     An unreclaimed surface mine was located along Two Lick Creek



on the bank opposite the area described above.  Two drift open-



ings were located in the base of the strip mine highwall but were



dry.  Discharge No.'s 1*713 and 1*71** were located below the base



of the strip mine spoil piles.  The combined acid load of these



two effluents was 126 Ib/day.






Allen Run




     Contour surface mines are located along both banks of Allen



Run.  Two drainage sources were located at one operation and the



other was dry.  The two discharging sources contributed a combined



acid load of 2k Ib/day (No,' s 1*756 and 1*757).



     An active drift mine, operated by the Chestnut Ridge Mining



Company was in operation near the headwaters of Allen Run.  The




mine is located in the base of a surface mine highwall.  This mine



had a small treatment facility but since the mine was dry at in-



spection, this facility was not in operation.





Two Lick Creek, Allen Run to Ramsey Run




     Several combination surface and underground mines were located



along the bank of Two Lick across from the mouth of Allen Run.   These



mines and possibly a few others have become inundated as a result of



the new Two Lick Creek Reservoir.  At the time of the source investi-



gation, this reservoir was under construction and has since been com-



pleted.
                            191

-------
     An active drift mine, operated by the Peles Brothers Coal




Corporation, was in operation on an unnamed tributary to Two Lick



Creek, a short distance below the mouth of Allen Run.   This mine



was dry at the time of inspection.






Ramsey Run




     With the exception of a small seepage area near its mouth,



Ramsey Run is unaffected by mine drainage discharges.   The exact



origin of this single discharge, No. 14-758, is not known but it



may result naturally from a coal outcrop in the stream bed.  The



load carried by the 8 gpm effluent was alkaline with some minor



discoloration.






Two Lick Creek, Ramsey Run to Yellow Creek




     The R & P Lucerne No. 3-A Mine is located on Two Lick Creek,



a short distance below the mouth of Ramsey Run.  At this point,



the coal is hauled across Two Lick Creek and through the hill



separating the Two Lick and Yellow Creek drainage areas.  The



coal finally emerges at the preparation plant located on Yellow



Creek.  The drainage from the mine is pumped to the surface near



the portals on Two Lick Creek.  At the time of inspection, approxi-



mately  100 gpm was piped  through  a revolving drum which contained



limestone.  After emerging from the drum, the drainage was piped



to a  settling pond prior  to discharge to Two Lick Creek.  The final



effluent carried an alkaline load of 60 Ib/day and the iron concen-




tration was 2.0 mg/1 (Mine No. 5153).
                            192

-------
     The Lucerne 3-A mine is now reported by the Commonwealth as



closed and sealed.  However, acid seeps have occurred around the



seals and also from a discharge pipe within one of the seals.



     Mine No. 1*791 wa-s the last source of mine drainage discharge



above the mouth of Yellow Creek.  It appears that a shaft or



similar mine entry has been sealed at this site on the bank of



Two Lick Creek.  A wooden drainage pipe emerges from the bank of



the stream approximately 20 feet from the old capped mine entry.



The discharge was 320 gpm and carried an acid load of 7,910 Ib/day.



     During the survey period, Two Lick Creek above Yellow Creek



carried an acid load ranging from 31,369 Ib/day to 6^,351 Ib/day.
Tearing Run




     A total of 19 mine drainage discharges were located in the



^.7 square mile drainage area of Tearing Run.  The combined acid



load from the sources was 5,657 Ib/day.  Mine No.'s 1*769 and U771



were both major sources of underground mine discharge.  These mines



are located on the main stem of Tearing Run near the community of



Waterman.  The remains of what appears to be a mine seal is located



at the opening of Mine No. ^769.  A 90 gpm discharge from this seal




carried an acid load of 1,793 Ib/day.  Mine No. ^771 is located



adjacent to several old mine buildings in the same general vicinity



as Mine No. ^769.  There are two openings about twenty feet apart



at Mine U771.  The combined effluent from these openings was 380 gpm
                            193

-------
which, carried an acid load of 1,778 Ib/day.



     A strip mine, which discharges to a tributary of Tearing Run,



is a major source of mine acid discharge.  This mine is a steeply



pitched contour strip mine with a vertical relief of nearly kQO



feet.  There were numerous seepage areas occurring at the base of



the high wall.  This drainage then flows along the floor of the



strip cut until it drains away from the mined area via. natural drain-



ways through the spoil piles.  A total of five such discharges were



located along the one mile length of this mine.  The combined acid




load of these five sources (No.''s 1*737, ^738, 1*739, V7UO, Vftl) was



1,60U Ib/day.






Two Lick Creek, Tearing Run to Mouth




     A surface and underground mined area near the community of



Graceton contributed numerous discharges to Two Lick Creek.  At



least one large underground mine was once operative in this area.




This  activity was followed by surface mine operations which par-



tially destroyed or covered some of the old mine entries.  There



is considerable seepage around the lower edge of the entire complex.



This  drainage emanates from both the strip mine spoil piles and the



refuse piles associated with the earlier underground mine.



      The largest acid discharge in the area described above drains



from  Mine No. Vf28.  At this site, a caved portal was located along




the hillside.  Approximately 50 feet below the old portal, three



mine  effluents emerged from the hillside.  The combined  flow of



these effluents was 220 gpm and the acid load was 2,7^6  Ib/day.

-------
Another source of underground drainage resulted from Mine No. U732.




The 30 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slumped drift open-



ing and follows a drainage course adjacent to a bank of coke ovens.



This effluent then combines vith the drainage from Mine No. U?28.



The acid load discharged by Mine No. 1*732 was 128 lb/day;  An ad-



ditional acid load of 303 lb/day was contributed by drainage from



the strip mine and the refuse piles (No.'s 4729, 4730, 1*731, and




4733).



     Mine No. 's 4727 and 4734 are drift mines located just a short



distance from the complex mentioned above.  It is not known whether



these mines interconnect with this area or whether they are associ-



ated with the next downstream mines at Coral.  The acid loads dis-




charged by Mine No. 's 4727 and 4734 were 284 lb/day and 117 lb/day,



respectively.



     A large slope mine once operated at Coral.  Several banks of



beehive coke ovens still remain at this old mine site.  Both slope



openings to this mine were dry.  However, the portals appeared to



be water filled a short distance inside the openings.  Discharge



No. 4725 represents the overflow from a pond located at the Coral



complex.  This pond was probably used for quench water for the



coke ovens or may have been used in a coal preparation plant.



The acid load was 28 lb/day.








                        YEUDW CREEK




Headwaters Area




     Several underground and surface mines were located at the
                           195

-------
headwaters of Yellow Creek near the small community of Alverda.



Mine No, Ul82 was the only source of mine drainage discharge in



this area and the acid load was negligible.   Several shaft and/or



slope openings to deeper coal seams were also found but  were dry.



One non-discharging surface mine pond was sampled (No. Ul83),



however, the pond was highly alkaline.



     The community of Mentcle is located along Yellow Creek, a



short distance downstream of Alverda.  A large slope mine is lo-



cated in the community of Mentcle.  The main portal and  air shaft



were dry although there was noticeable subsidence behind the caved



slope opening.  This was the Bethlehem No. 11 Mine (Heilwood Divi-



sion).  Although dry at the portal, this mine contributed a dis-



charge of 819 gpm near Heilwood, the next downstream community.



Locally, the discharge is known as the "Heilwood Flume".  The dis-



charge was alkaline and carried an alkaline load of 8^5  Ib/day.



     Three additional mine openings, reported locally as the Beth-



lehem No.'s 6, 7, and 8 Mines, are located on the hillside approxi-



mately one mile upstream of Heilwood.  There are three separate



mine openings in this area.  Each of these openings are  associated



with a sizable refuse pile.  Mine No. Ul?9 was the only one of the



three openings contributing drainage at the time of inspection.



The acid load from this source was 12 Ib/day.





Leonard Run




     The active valley Coal Company No. 8 Mine is located on the



east bank of Leonard Run near the headwaters of the tributary.
                            196

-------
The mine is located in the base of a strip mine highwall.  At the



time of inspection, this mine produced an effluent of 60 gpm



(No. 51^8).  This acid drainage was then lime treated and sent to



a series of settling ponds.  However, the final effluent from the



pond carried an acidity concentration of 53 mg/1 with a resultant



acid load of 38 Ib/day.  A second acid discharge (No. 51^9) of



18 Ib/day emanated from the refuse scattered about the Valley




No. 8 Mine site.  The present status of this mine is unknown.



     Additional surface and underground mines are located along



both banks of Leonard Run.  In general, the discharges from these



mines contributed acid loads of less than 10 Ib/day.  One of the



underground mines was reported as the Bethlehem No. 3 Mine.  This



drift mine is located on the east bank of Leonard Run near its




confluence with Yellow Creek south of Heilwood.  There was notice-



able subsidence around the portal area.  The 20 gpm effluent carried



an acid load of 1*4- Ib/day (Mine No. U125).



     The Valley Coal No. 2 preparation plant is located on the east



bank of Leonard Run near its mouth.  As of February 1971» this faci-



lity was listed as "in compliance" by the Pennsylvania Department of



Environmental Resources.



     There were no additional coal mine  sites located in that por-



tion of the Yellow Creek watershed above the confluence of Little



Yellow Creek.






                     LITTLE YELIDW CREEK



     A total of fifteen surface mined areas were located along the
                           197

-------
banks of Yellow Creek in the headwaters area.   Several of these



operations were active at the time of survey.   There were no




drainage sources emanating from the surface mined areas.   One



strip mine pond was sampled and the alkalinity concentration was



Ul rag/1 (No. 4178).



     Drift mines had been developed in two of the surface mines.



The underground mine in the northernmost surface mine was aban-



doned and dry.  Both the Glory Coal Company and the Valley Coal



Company operate underground mines in the second surface mined



area.  The Glory No. 2 Mine was dry.  Treatment facilities for



the Valley No. 11 Mine had been installed but, for a lack of



drainage at inspection time, these facilities were not in use.



     There were no additional coal mine operations located in



the downstream areas of the Little Yellow Creek drainage area.






           YELIDW CREEK BEIDW LITTLE YELLOW CREEK




     Only a limited number of coal mine operations were located



along Yellow Creek between the mouth of Little Yellow Creek and the



area downstream near the Homer City water supply reservoir.  The



few drift mine operations which were located, are in the general



vicinity of the New Yellow Creek dam approximately one mile down-



stream of the old route 259 crossing of Yellow Creek.  Much of




this surrounding area has been cleared for the formation of a new



lake on Yellow Creek.  Mine No. Ul22 was the only source of dis-



charge and contributed an acid load of only 2 Ib/day.  Several
                            198

-------
mine openings near the dam site have been sealed as part of the



overall development of Yellow Creek State Park.






Yellow Creek, Homer City Reservoir to Mouth




     Yellow Creek supports stocked trout and other fish over its



entire length down to and including the Homer City water supply



reservoir.  A short distance below the reservoir, the stream be-



comes grossly polluted as a result of coal mine discharges.




     Both surface and underground mines are located along both



banks of Yellow Creek in the vicinity of the reservoir.  Point



sources of mine drainage contributed only minor acid loads.  How-



ever, refuse areas and numerous unreclaimed spoil banks add im-



measurable amounts of acid to the stream.  The north bank of Yellow



Creek has been mined by surface and underground methods in at least



two coal seams.  In places, the outcrop has been "punch mined" with



as many as ten drift openings occurring side-by-side.



     An unnamed tributary, which enters Yellow Creek approximately



O.U mile upstream from the community of Tide, discharges a signi-



ficant acid load to the receiving stream.  Mine No. 1263 was the



largest source of acid discharge on this small tributary.  The



mine has been sealed and a 25 gpm effluent discharged from the



base of this seal.  The acid load was 810 Ib/day.  Another mine



opening (No. 126U) is located about 200 feet north of Mine No. 1263.



The discharge from Mine No. 126U was 12 gpm with a resultant acid



load of UO Ib/day.  Drift Mine No. 1265 discharged an acid load of
                               199

-------
36 lb/day while Mine No.  1266,  a combination underground and sur-



face mine, contributed an additional acid load of 1?6 lb/day.



     Near the mouth of the unnamed tributary mentioned above,  the



stream also receives an undetermined amount of seepage from the



large refuse pile at Tide.  During the period of survey, this



small tributary carried an acid load ranging from 2,988 lb/day




to 5,952 lb/day (Table 2U, Station No. U?90).



     A second unnamed tributary enters Yellow Creek at Tide.   This



tributary drains a small area of the watershed immediately south of



the unnamed tributary described above.  Discharge No.?s 126l and



1262 were the major sources of mine drainage discharge on this



tributary.  Both effluents represent cumulative seepage from the



base of strip mine spoil piles.  It also appeared that the area



had been drift mined.  The acid loads discharged by No.'s 1261 and



1262 were 312 lb/day and 936 lb/day, respectively.  Additional dis-



charges contributed a combined acid load exceeding 130 lb/day.



However, this tributary also receives an undetermined amount of



seepage from the large refuse pile at Tide.  During the period of



survey, this unnamed tributary discharged an acid load to Yellow



Creek which ranged from 1,U90 lb/day to 5,610 lb/day (Table 2^,




Station No. 1*789).



     In the vicinity of Tide, Yellow Creek acquired the gross dis-



coloration evident along the remaining downstream length.  Refuse



and other waste material is scattered along the bank of Yellow Creek.



     of this material is washed into the stream itself.  The large
                            200

-------
refuse pile located on the nearby hillside covers some *4O acres.



Seepage areas are evident along nearly the entire length of these



refuse areas.  It is the .cumulative effect of these effluents in



combination with the two unnamed tributaries described above



which totally degrade the water quality as well as the aesthetic



appearance of Yellow Creek.  A few of the seepage areas were sam-



pled during'the study.  These discharges exhibited acidity con-



centrations as high as 15,250 mg/1 (No. 5006).  The iron concen-



tration of this sample was 1,178 mg/1.



     A 50 acre refuse-dump from the Lucerne Mines is located



along the bank of Yellow Creek, a short distance below Tide.  As



with the Tide refuse area, this disposal area also contributes



an undetermined amount of mine acid and solid materials to Yellow



Creek.  Only one of the seepage areas was sampled and the 3 gpm



effluent carried an acid load of l6l Ib/day (Ho. 5001).  A sludge



pond associated with the same Lucerne complex also contributed an



acid load of 21 Ib/day (No. 125H).   The operating Lucerne Mine dis-



charged its effluent to Two Lick Creek and is discussed in an earlier



section of this document.



     The last source of discharge in the Yellow Creek drainage area



resulted from an undetermined source.  The effluent discharged in-



termittently from what appeared to be a bore hole pipe located at



the edge of the cooling water pond from the old power plant on the



east side of Route 119 almost directly across from the Homer City



Water Works.  Discharge from this bore hole pipe was observed on
                           201

-------
     FIGURE 16

  TWO LICK  CREEK
MINE LOCATION  MAP

-------
several occasions  during the course of field work in the  immediate




area.  However, on the single occasion that  a field crew was able




to determine that the discharge was mine drainage (pH  <3.0), the



flow ceased before a sample could be collected.   The drainage from



this pipe feeds the small cooling pond which in  turn overflows



into Yellow Creek.








     A total of 17^- discharging sources and  approximately  2,800




acres of surface mined area were investigated during this  study.



Table 25 presents an area breakdown in terms of  total  flow and



total loading (ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to



receiving streams in the Two Lick Creek study area. Table 26



presents a summary of flow volumes and chemical  loadings by



source type for the 1?^- discharging sources  inventoried during



the study.






                     POLLUTION ABATEMENT




     As shown in Table 26, active mines are  not  a significant



source of mine drainage pollution in the Two Lick Creek watershed.



The overall net load from mines operating in the Two Lick  Creek



watershed was alkaline.  With the existing pollution control  laws



in effect within the Commonwealth, it would not  be expected the



new mines developed in this watershed should add to the existing



mine drainage pollution problems.  At the time  of inventory,  an



acid load of more than 18 tons per day was contributed by  inactive



or abandoned coal mine operations.
                           205

-------































m
CM

3
PQ
<
H



































e "£.
3 n)
C T)
•H s*»».
B xi
3 r-l
,-_! ^^x
OJ ^N
w ^
0) n)
C -0
60X1
C r-l
C
O ^N
J-l >>
H cd
id
4J i-l
O ***
H
/-s
0) >s
4J nj
ctf ^0
t— ( j^l
3 T-4
CO N-'
CO ^s
CO CO >s
oo i— i co nj
C cd d *d
•H 4J T3 *^
rrj g O r-l XI
cd cd fed H cd r-i
O CD W ffi N-'
•U K
O co U
00 4J
cd 60 W OJ >s^
o >> c cj a w >,
•H XI 1-1 H -H Cd
td > hJ i-l t3 T)
Vi -H n) .H v^_
*tj <1) O 4J O XI
0 3 O 
<0
00
f_|
?— 1 Oj r*^s
dj r^ €
4J 0 CX
O TO 60
Q ^
05
O 0
Jj
• 3
O O
2; co













60
c
•H
•H Cd
0) (U
U M

0)
r4
O

I-l
r-l
co
co
CM



vO
r-l





O
ON
CM



CO
m
ON
CM



s^
co






co
^J
^J*
t*
CM





o
vO
I-l





CO
r-l



SE
o
r-l
1-1
Q)
>*
o
u

(0
_o
•H
4J

T)
Unname
Creek
VO VO VO in r-l O
m J 00 CO
O -vj" ON r^ i— i
 3 a
rJ !3 h PQ Ct|
p o o o
3 4J & 4J 4J
H 0
CO TH CO CO
J3 XI rJ XI XI
O -H -H C -H
B MO M 3 P
{£
r-> -*
CM




r-l ON






CO CM
f^





-------





























'•s
a)
3
C
•H
U
C
o
O

in
CSI

w
rJ
CQ
H





































B -N
3 r**
C cd
•H T)
B "^
3 43
I-l 1-1
0) /-s
CO >-,
a) cd

6043
C r-l
C
O *~s

H cd
T3
cd 43
1 | j
O N-X
H
4) X-N
4J >,
cd cd
M-l TJ
i— 1 "• —
3 43
CO r-l
CO x-N
CO >,

nj C *"O
O J-i ,O
H cd r-i
H! s^


ij
0) r^<—V
•H Cd
1-1 13 t)
cd v-i *^
4J O 43
O  B
•H cd
0) 0)
U (-1
m jj
« co

co i-< i5 CSI
r-l CO







00 CSI CO CO



rrj
fa
cd C
C C
O O)
(U P-i
l_3
o
O 4J
4J
CO CO
43 43
C *H -H
3 U M
D5 4J 4-1
C
tl (!) OH (1)
cd B B
C cd C cd
O C C C C C
m C 3. 0) G 3
rJ P {2 PH P 06

O rH VO St
r^- ON
r-l



O CN O csi
CSI r-l





O o oo m
ON 00
CO r-l




•vt rH 00 si"
o m o
i-i oo ^o
v£> CSI


v£5 vO *^ tO
o in ON
t-l O VO
csi






csi , CO)
n
ft
>o
CO






CM
O
r-l
r*
r^>





*^
r*»-
r-4










J
^
C_(
Q
H






207

-------




























CO
60
C
•H
•O
ctf
O
VO r-l
CM
CU
W M
3 Ctf fc
« C JC
s
C cd
•H TJ
lie
r~l r-i
< ^
cu x-\
w ts
 cd
C TJ
ctf ^
60.0
C *H
£~
C
o '•N
n ts
H ctf
•O
rH ^*s,
Ctf rQ
4J r-l
O ^
H
CU /-N
4J >,
cd cd
"4-1 TJ
_J ^^
r™* ^x.
3 XI
CO r-4
V^
CO X-N
0) >N
i-4 ,
) H -H cd
CU 1-4 r-l TJ *O
O Cd -H ^^
U O 4J 0 JD
3 S O -^ •-<
O N H ^
CO

CO
0)
60
r-l ,4 ^s
cd cd E
4-> J3 O.
O U 00
H co "-'
•H
Q
CO
<4-l CU
0 0
V4
• 3
o o
!3 CO





0)
U
iJ (U
3 (X
0 >s
CO H
r~ m co O
r» r-i co
00 r-l



co co in O
1-4 r-i in
i-i

'



00 00 «tf O
m co CM
ON r-l CM
I-l




00 t^ ON CM
r-l 00 VO
r-. oo vo
co co «n
co

ON «* l*» CM
00 O 00
m  r-4
O O O I
m in vo
~ i f.
m CM
r-i






O CM 00 i-l
oo vo r-. i
CM m r~
^
«*




r-4 VO CM r-l
r>. ^>






CO /-^ 10 CO *~* to
CU T) CU CU TJ CU
c cu a c cu c
g§ 27 S§ S7
•O P *w i>
•U C 4Jv4 O.C &i-"
U-lcd —' CO^-'
vo r>- r>>
ON ON vo
CM CO vO



r>. vo oo
CM vt 3F






vt «* m
.
o r~ oo
VO r-l 00
r-l

QO VO r-4
CM ON rv
<»• o\ oo
•t A
CM CM




vo r^ in
t^ r-4 O>
VO r-l r-l
ft ft ft
CO 00 f^






m o vo
r-l in ON
t>- CO CM






00 CM O
CM CM


CO
cu
c
•H
a
01
C '••* co *^> CU *~\
O TJ CU "O r-t 'O
•H CU C CU vl CU
4J C -H C PM C
cfl 0 S 0 0
C TJ TJ 0) -O
•H C 4J C CO C
A ctf M-I cd 3 ctf
6 J3 cd J3 u-i X)
O ctf ,13 rfl CU cd
CJ v-' co ^ (K ^^
o m
CM




O CM






(^ co







CM m
m in
in



o in
m m






2 3









CM 00
CM ON







CM CM






&
O
^•N r4
CO (U U
i-l > W
r-4 ••-) 3
cu jj O
S o
Cd r-l
co C cd
cd 1-1 o
o ^ o
m
r-4
•*
CM


3
co





co
CM
o
«
r-l

J3
<
»^
H






208

-------
     Based on the initial field survey sampling program,  12 of the



total 17^ discharging sites contributed nearly 80 percent of the



total acid load measured in the study area.   These sources in-




cluded six drift mines, three combination surface-underground



mines, two coal refuse areas, and one shaft  mine.  The combined



acid load discharged by these 12 sites was 29,II1! Ib/day.



     Several of the principal sources represent only the  major



discharge points within a mined area or complex which may contain



several additional sources which contribute less significant acid



loads.  In such cases, abatement or reduction of the acid loads



emanating from these sources of lesser magnitude would be expected



coincident with abatement of the major source site.



     Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement pro-



gram in Two Lick Creek should include the 12 sources mentioned




above.  Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites would



be expected to contribute significant acid discharges. Detailed



engineering studies and mine effluent sampling, conducted during



an entire water year, would more accurately characterize  the rela-



tive contribution of each source.  Such long-term repetitive water



quality determinations may necessitate the consideration  of addi-



tional major sources located elsewhere in the watershed.



     The 12 principal sources listed in Table 27 provide  a rela-



tive indication as to where the major mine drainage problems occur



in the Two Lick Creek watershed.  Until such a time when  additional
                           209

-------
B
cd
CD
Vj
JJ
CO

01
c

^
•rl
0
&



cd

•*v.
XI
4J
•*
^ rH
co •*-,
(U bj
o 6
3
O
CO
60 b4
cd U Q>
C W o
r^ -H re o c
CM cd O -H cd
L| M-4 4-1
W TJ 14 -HO
. i r ^ rl -1
1— 4 Vj U (J
PQ CO r-l 

-" VO co ON O O in vO 0 o o vO o CO CM r-l a d S C o •rl 4J cd C •rl 0 O CM vO CM r-l 0 0 4J 4J h h M rl cd cd jj fSd ,^ r*xj 4J ^ rX ,M 3 Is** r^ r^> ^5 »~H


-------
study can provide a more detailed assessment of the problem, these



12 sources can effectively serve as the first phase or priority in



a program of drainage source abatement in the Two Lick Creek water-




shed.  Once drainage control has been established at the principal




source sites, the abatement program could be expanded to include



additional discharge points of lesser magnitude.



     The following is a description of the twelve principal sources.



The locations of these mine sites are shown in Figure 17.






                      ERINCIBVL SOURCES




Mine Ho. 1262




     This combination surface underground mine is located on an un-



named tributary to Yellow Creek.  The 12 gpm effluent represents



cumulative seepage from the base of strip mine spoil piles.  This



surface activity has destroyed or covered older underground mine



entries.  Refuse from an underground mine located elsewhere in the



vicinity has also been dumped in the strip cut.  One section of the



disturbed area was also used as a sanitary landfill.  The acid load



was 936 Ib/day.  An additional drainage source (No. 126l), from this



same mined area, contributed an acid load of 312 Ib/day.






Mine No. 1263




     Mine No. 1263 discharged an acid load of 810 Ib/day.  The drift



opening has been sealed and the drainage emerges from a trap device



at the base of the seal.  The area directly in front of the openings
                           211

-------
           FIGURE  17

        TWO LICK CREEK
PRINCIPAL  SOURCE LOCATION MAP

-------
appears to have been surface mined and then Mine No. 1263 was de



veloped in the base of the highwall.






Mine No. *H59




     The U6 gpm effluent from this mine drains directly from an



open drift mouth developed in the base of a strip mine highwall.



At least six additional openings were visible along the length



of this surface mine.  The acid load from Mine No. ^159 was



615 Ib/day.  Other discharges from this same mine contributed an



additional acid load of 9^ Ib/day (No.'s *H55 and





Mine No.
     This mine is located on the opposite bank of Two Lick Creek



directly across from the now abandoned Cherry Hill No. 3 Mine.   A



large refuse pile is also associated with Mine No. ^165.  One open-



ing to this mine was dry while the other discharged a 310 gpm efflu-



ent which carried an acid load of 3>2jh Ib/day.






Mine No. Ul66




     This mine is located on the south side of Route 223 approxi-



mately two miles east of Clytner.  (Near the Clymer Fire Tower).



The opening is approximately 90 vertical feet above the roadway.



The opening had been sealed at one time but the 50 gpm effluent



has since broken through the adjacent hillside about 15 feet from



the seal.  The acid load carried to Two Lick Creek was 2,664 Ib/day.
                           215

-------
Mine No.
     Mine No. kjok is a drift opening located at the tip of a con-



tour surface mine extending along main stem Two Lick Creek just




downstream from the community of Clymer.   This opening is one of



several in the immediate area associated with the abandoned Cherry



Hill No. 1 Mine.  The portal to Mine No.  kjOk has slumped and the



105 gpm effluent discharges via pipe extending from the interior



portion of the mine.  The effluent is channeled to two settling ponds




and then overflows to Two Lick Creek.  Treatment facilities have been



operative at this site during the past.  There were numerous bags of



unused and spoiled lime remaining at the site.  However, all physical



structures associated with this facility have since been removed.



The acid load contributed by this source was 1,103 Ib/day.






tit* No. 1*710




     A large underground mine complex was at one time operative on



an unnamed northbank tributary to Two Lick Creek approximately one



mile downstream from Clymer.  Openings to this mine were located on



both sides of Route 286.  Although these openings were dry, the



large refuse pile associated with this mine was responsible for the



discharge of a very highly mineralized effluent.  The 9 gP*11 effluent,



representing cumulative seepage from the base of the pile, exhibited




an acidity concentration of ^5,700 mg/1.   The acid load was ^,936 Ib/day.



Two additional seeps from the same refuse area contributed a combined




additional acid load of U79 Ib/day (No. 's U711, 1*712).
                           216

-------
Mine No. 1»728




     This mine is located in an area which has been mined both by-



surface and underground mining methods.  At this particular cite,



a slumped drift mine was located along the hillside.  Approximately



50 feet below thi* portal, three separate effluents emerged from



the hillside.  The combined flow of these effluents was 220 gpm



and the resultant acid load was 2,7^6 Ib/day.  Seepage from the



strip mine spoil piles, refuse areas, and other mine openings con-



tributed an additional acid load of more than bQO Ib/day.





Mine No.
     Mine No. 1*769 is located on Tearing Run near the community of



Waterman.  This opening is one of five in the immediate area, all



of which are probably associated with the same mine operation.  The



opening had been sealed at one time but this seal has fall«n into



disrepair and the 90 gpm effluent emerges directly from the seal.



The acid load carried to Tearing Run was 1/793 Ib/day.





Mine No. **771.




     This mine is located in the same immediate area as Mine No.



1*769 described above.  However, the openings are on the opposite



side of Tearing Run near several old mine buildings.  The two'



openings at Mine No. 1*771 are about 20 feet apart and contributed



a combined discharge of 380 gpm.  The acid load was 1,778 Ib/day.
                            217

-------
Mine No. U791




     The origin of this source is actually a bore hole located on



the bank of Two lack Creek near Hisinger School in Homer City.  It



appears that a shaft or slope entry has been sealed at this site.



A wooden drainage pipe emerges from the bank of the stream approxi-



mately 20 feet from the sealed entry.  The discharge was 320 gpm



which carried an acid load of 7,910 Ib/day.  This site represents



the largest single source of mine drainage pollution in the entire



Two Lick Creek drainage area.  A local resident stated that this



discharge emanated from the old Tide Mine.





Site Ho. 5006




     No. 5006 represents cumulative seepage from the base of a



large refuse pile near the community of Tide.  This effluent repre-



sents only one of innumerable and generally immeasurable seeps



which originate at the base of this gob disposal area.  These



seepage areas occurred along most of the 0.6 mile length of the



pile.  The acidity concentration of this effluent was more than



15,000 tng/1 with a resultant acid load of 5^9 Ib/day.
                            218

-------
LITTLE OOHIMUBH RIVER
WKE DRAIKAOE IKVENTORY
        219

-------
                        LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER

                       SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


1.   The Little Conemaugh River drains  an area of 188  square miles in

    Cambria County.   The entire length of the main  stem between the

    headwaters and the community of Jet  stown is severely  polluted

    as a result of coal mine discharges.  Some  of the largest dis-

    charges in the Kiskiminetas River  basin are located in the vicinity

    of Portage.


2.   A total of 99 discharging sources  and approximately 1,UOO acres

    of surface rained area were investigated in  the  study area.  Dis-

    charges from the coal mine sources ranged from  one to  3»78U gpm

    and totalled more than 29 million  gallons per day (mgd).  The

    total net acid load discharged by  the 99 sources  was 153,570 Ib/day.


3.   At the time of survey, there were  four active discharging mines

    in the Little Conemaugh River basin.  Two were  surface mines and

    the other two were drift mines. The largest of the underground

    operations was the brookdale #77 Mine of the Bethlehem Mine Corp-

    oration.  At the time of inspection, this mine  produced an untreated

    effluent which carried an acid load of 1,^15 Ib/day.   According to

    the Commonwealth, this mine now provides adequate treatment of its

    mine discharge.

                                                                      \
U.   Abandoned drift mines and shaft mines were  the  major source of mine

    drainage discharge in the Little Conemaugh  River  basin.  These two

    source types contributed an acid load exceeding 70.5 tons  per  day.
                                 220

-------
    This represented over 90 percent of the acid load discharged by all



    99 sources in the basin.



5.  A total of seven principal sources of mine drainage discharge were



    located in the study area.  These sources included five shaft vines



    and two drift nines.  These sources discharged a total net acid



    load of 121,3^ Ib/day.  This represents about 80 percent of the



    total source acid load discharged by all 99 sources.





                          DESCRIPTION OF AREA





     The Little Conemaugh River rises south of Cresson, Pennsylvania



in Caabria County.  The river flows generally southwest through the



communities of Lilly, Portage, South fork, and joins Stony Creek at



Johnstown to form the Coneaaugh River.  The principal tributary to the



Little Conemaugh River is the South Fork of the Little Coneaaugh River.



The South Fork drains 62 square miles of the total 188 square idle



drainage area of the Little Coneaaugh River.



     Coal mine operations are extensive in all areas of the watershed.



A number of large abandoned shaft mines are located in this study area,



particularly in the vicinity of Portage.  The bore hole discharges from



these shaft mines contribute some of the largest acid loads encountered



in the entire Kiskioinetas River drainage area.  At the time of the mine



drainage inventory, active underground operations were limited to the



large Cambria Ho. 33 slope and the Brockdale No. 77 Mines of Bethlehem



Mines Corporation.  At the time of the survey, several one or two nan



"donkey mines" were also in operation.  Several active surface mines



were inspected and it appeared that additional areas were available



for the expansion of these operations.





                                 221

-------
                         STREAM tRTER QUALITY





     The headwaters area of the Little Conemaugh Hirer was  immediately



degraded by discharges from abandoned surface and underground coal  nine



operations.  The polluted condition of the river is farther degraded by



massive acid discharges in the vicinity of Portage.  This degraded  water



quality condition persists along the downstream reach of the river  to



the community of South Fork.



     The drainage area of South Fork little Coneaaugh River is umaffected



by mine drainage above the community of Lloydell.  Below this community,



shaft mine discharges located along the main stem and tributaries of



the South Fork were responsible for the grossly polluted condition  feua*



along the entire downstream reach of the South Fork.



     Below the conwunity of South Fork, the water quality of the Little



Conemaugh River does not improve along its downstream roach to the  con-



fluence with Stony Creek at Johnstown.  There were numerous sources of



significant mine drainage discharge in this area.



     During the course Of the field study, several stream  locations



were sampled for chemical analysis. (Table 28).  These stations were



selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine drainage in the



study area.  A summary of this data is presented in Table 29.  The



locations of these sampling points are shown in Figure 18.





                       SOURCES OF mire DRAINAGE



     An estimated 230 mining sites and approximately 1,UOO acres of



surface mined area were examined during this 1968 study.  Samples for
                                 222

-------
oo
CM

a
       CO
       C
       O
       •H
       4J
       cd
       4J
       TO

       60
       n
       •H
cfl
CO
       n)
       3
       a4
       0)
       4J
        rt
        
a;
60
cd
60
CO
o
CO

s
£
•a
3
cd

Q)
c
0
u

0)
r^
4J
4J
•H




00
ON
t 	 1
n
o

§<*£)
ON
O i— 1
0)
Q >s
M
« cd
^» 3
.-i C
3 cd


i— i
vO
(M
m

^4
o
J*
4J
3
O
CO

U-l
0

42
4J
3
i
&
O
i-i
,
^4
ctf
j3
a
cd







                                                             223

-------
I
s».
§ TJ
C •--
5 ^
a
d
t> -a
i*
00
C fi
It
fl f"
r-l
4J H
O <
X
(0
B>
W-l
iH
3 fi
C/l "x^
0
e
4
GO -0
|S
S-3
•H JD
Specific 7
9 Conductance

Station Sampling
No. Date

CO 00 xt
, • •
f U C
3 0» id
*-) Q fj

fx. CM CM
oO in o
m m rx
ft CM *n
ft f* CM
eO xt tx
 \O
ft 
O m m
ON O s X -
rH r-H U
^ 3 a
^ *-> a
»n
O = -
0
ft CM r*
00 CM NO
CM CM co
CM rH NO
o r-t m
0 f« 0
CM O ^
in fM oo

in i^, o"N,
ON fM O
CM ft O
o m oo
rx QO rx
ON rx oo
CM CM xT
m ON eo
NO CM O
ON O 00
O f* tx
ON r- CM
m in m
O g O
CM O SO
fl CM
CO CO O
eo co m
00
vO CO Qp
rx - -
§- J
4^
O 0 O
sss
O rx in
pr» r~ 1
CM f" rx
eo eo m
O eo «n
xt 1? 3
00 00
NO NO 00
ON ON NO
ft — ON
at x .
§•38
<-)-!&
O- :

-------

-------
chemical analysis were collected from 99 sources  discharging at the



time of survey.   The total effluent from these sources was more than



20 thousand gallons per minute (gpm) or 29.k million gallons per  day



(mgd).  The total net acid load discharged to the Little Conemaugh



River was ?6.8 tons per day.



     A description of the mine drainage sources follows. All  mine



site locations in this study area are shown  in Figure 19 following



the source description section.





               LITTLE OOHEM&UGH RIVER, ABOVE SOUTH FORK



Headwaters Area



     Ho coal mine operations vere located along the short reach of the



main stem Little Conemaugh River between the headwater community  of



Cressen and downstream community of Lilly.  However, several mine



drainage discharges were located on an unnamed tributary which enters



the main stem in this headwater area.  The most significant  of these



discharges resulted from Nine Ho. 5061.  At  this site, a 65  gpm efflu-



ent from the base of a slumped drift mine opening discharged an acid



load of 37** Ib/day to the receiving tributary.  The three remaining



discharges (Mine Ho.'s 5060, 5062, 5063) contributed a combined acid



load of 158 Ib/day.  An open shaft mine was  also found in this area;



however, it contributed no discharge.





Burgeon Run, Bear Rock Run



     A total of eight drift openings were located along the  banks of



Burgeon Run.  At the time of inspection, all of these mines  were  dry



and as a result, the tributary was unaffected by mine drainage.   The
                                  226

-------
pH and conductivity measured near the mouth of Burgoon Run were 6.5 and



310, respectively.



     With the exception of the very headwaters area, vine operations were



distributed throughout the entire Bear Rock Run drainage area.  An active



surface mine was located on Christie Hollow, a tributary to Bear Rock



Run.  Settling ponds had been constructed below this operation; however,



the nine was dry.  In addition to this surface mine, three drift mines



were in operation during the study.  These were the Standard Wo. 1 and



Mo. 2 Mines of the Lilly Mining Company and the mine operated by the



Hew Hope Mining Company.  These mines were small two-four man operations



which employed donkeys for coal car haulage.  All of these mines were dry.



     The most significant source of abandoned mine discharge in the Bear



Rock Run drainage area resulted from Mine Ho. 5058.  At this surface mine,



a  snail tributary (hillside spring) had been diverted through a partially



reclaimed surface mine.  This small tributary carried an acid load of



1^9 Ib/day below the surface mined area near the point where the tribu-



tary entered Bear Rock Run.





Little Ceaenaugh River



     Several discharges from abandoned underground drift mines were



located along the main stem Little Conemaugh River below the coosnnity



of Lilly.  These mines include No.'a 5116, $117, and 5118.  The com-



bined acid load discharged by these mines was ikl Ib/day.



     A series of bore hole discharges were located along the banks of



the Little Conemaugh River in the general vicinity of Portage.
                                 227

-------
     The first of these bore hole discharges was located along the



north bank of the river at site No.  5H^»  northeast of Portage.  A



total effluent of 1,400 gpm was measured at this site.  The acid



load vas nearly 6 tons per day.



     The second site (Ho. 5115) vas found  along the south bank of



the river just north of Portage.  Two side-by-side bore holes at



this location discharged a combined effluent of 563 gpa.  The acid



load vas 3,783 Ib/day.



     The last bore hole discharges in this area were located along



the north bank of the river about 0.8 mile west of No. 511?.  These



were No.'s 5008 and 5129.  An effluent of  2?8 gpm discharged from



No. 5008.  The effluent comes to the surface via pipe casing which



once carried power lines to the underground mine.  The discharge



from No. 5129 vas 3,?8U gpm.  The acid loads from No.'s 5008 and 5129



were 1,601 Ib/day and 22,70^ Ib/day, respectively.



     All of the bore hole discharges mentioned above were reported



as draining the large abandoned Sonman Mine.  The main portal to this



mine (slope entry) is located on Spring Run.  There was no discharge



at the portal.  The preparation plant associated with the Sonman Mine



was in use by surface mine operators for crushing and screening of



coal before loading into rail cars.  It appears likely that the Sonman



Mine may be interconnected with other shaft and/or slope mines in  the



vicinity of Portage.
                                  228

-------
Boas Crook
     Four surface mines and eight drift mines were located within the
Bens Creek drainage area.  The only active site was a surface mine in
the upper reaches of the tributary.  The major sources of mine drain-
age discharge were Nine Ho. 's 5119 and $120.  Mine Ho. $119 contributed
an effluent of 10 gpm from the base of the slumped drift opening.  The
acid load was 6O Ib/day.  The effluent at Ho. $120 discharged from a
drainway below several drift mine openings1  The 32 gpm effluent con-
tributed an acid load of 159 Ib/day.

Spring Run
     This small tributary drains an area northeast of the community
of Portage.  Mine Ho.'s $123 and $12U discharged the major portion of
the total acid load received by Spring Ran.  These loads were 119 Ib/day
and 21 Ib/day, respectively.   A small seepage area was also located at
the base of the refute pile from the abandoned Sonman Mine.  This source
(Ho. $069) contributed an acid load of 18  Ib/day.

Trout Run
     The ten square mile drainage area of Trout Run has been mined
extensively in all portions of the watershed below the Portage Reservoir.
There were no coal mine operations above the reservoir.
     A total of three effluents (Ho.'s 506*, 5065, $066) were located
along the base of a surface mine in the upstream area of Trout Run.  The
combined acid load discharged by these sources was 766 Ib/day.  The
major portion ($86 Ib/day) of this lead was contributed by Ho. $06U.
                                 229

-------
Several other strip mines and drift  mine openings associated with these



surface mines were located in this area; however, they were dry.



     An active drift mine, operated  by the Lonely Coal Company, was  in



operation along the north side of Trout Run.   This  mine  operated in  a



small coal reserve abandoned by prior mining  operations.   There was  no



discharge from the Lonely Mine.



     Mine No. 5159 is an abandoned drift mine driven under the bed of



State Route l6U, which parallels a portion of Trout Run.   There were



two openings to the mine, both of which were  partially open at the



time of inspection.  The airway was  dry; however, a discharge of 62  gpm



was measured at the mouth of the mine portal.  The  acid  load contributed



by Mine No. 5159 was 8C4 Ib/day.



     The large abandoned Miller Shaft Mine is located along the  lower



reaches of Trout Run.  A slope opening to this mine has  been driven



under the bed of State Route l6U. This opening was dry.   A second open-



ing was located in the vicinity of the tipple; however,  it was also  dry.



Approximately 150 yards below the tipple, a bore hole discharged an



artesian effluent of 2,282 gpm.  The acid load carried by this effluent



was more than 5.5 tons per day.  Five separate refuse dumps are  located



along the banks of Trout Run in the  vicinity of the Miller Shaft.  These



waste dumps undoubtedly contributed to the degraded water quality of the



stream.






North Branch



     The Bethlehem No. 33 Slope Mine was the only coal mine operation
                                  230

-------
located on this tributary to the Little Conemaugh River.   The drainage




from this mine is pumped to a treatment facility on the South Branch



of Blacklick Creek below the community of Revloc.  This discharge is



discussed in the Blacklick Creek Sub-basin report.



     A discharge was sampled near the mouth of North Branch.  However,



a gas well was responsible for this effluent.  The discharge carried a




net alkaline load of 1^9 Ib/day (No. 5113).






Little Conemaugh River



     One of the most extensive coal mine complexes in the entire



Kiskiminetas River basin was located in the community of Wilmore.



This was the Maryland No. 2 Mine of the Berwind White Coal Company.



In addition to the numerous mine buildings, preparation facilities,



etc., a coal fired steam generating plant was associated with the



Maryland mine.  Both main shaft entries to the mine have been sealed.



The only sources of discharge resulted from the waste dumps associated



with the Maryland complex.  Three of these effluents (No.'s 5070, 5l6l,



and 5162) contributed a combined acid load of k6l Ib/day.



     A series of abandoned drift mine openings were located along the



north bank of the Little Conemaugh River in the vicinity of Ehrenfield.



These were Mine No.'s 5108, 5109, and 5112 and discharged acid loads of



2^3 Ib/day, 338 Ib/day, and 2,646 Ib/day, respectively.  A discharge of



882 gpm was measured at Mine No. 5112.



     The active Ehrenfield No. 8 mine operated by the Pennsylvania



Coal and Coke Company, is located at Ehrenfield.  The only discharge



directly attributable to this mine was a four gpm effluent from the
                               231

-------
air fan.  There are numerous acid discharges in the immediate area;



however, the Commonwealth does not consider Ehrenfield No.  8 respon-



sible for these discharges.  These.other discharges were confined to



mines in coal seams below the active operation.  These included Mine



No.'s 5105, 5106, and 5107 and other discharge points near  the east



end of the community of Ehrenfield.   Mine seals have been constructed



at five discharge points in the immediate Ehrenfield area.   These in-



clude Mine No.'s 5102, 5103, 5110, and No.'s 5105, and 510? mentioned



earlier.



     Stream sampling was conducted on the Little Conemaugh  River Just



above the confluence with the South Fork Little Conemaugh River.  During



the sampling period, (Table 28) the acid load carried by the river ranged



from 22 tons per day to 56 tons per day (Table 29).





                SOUTH FORK LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER





Headwaters Area



     The Beaverdale water supply reservoir is located near  the head-



waters of the South Fork Little Conemaugh River.  Coal mine operations



were totally absent in the headwaters area which drain to the reservoir.



     Several surface mines were located on tributaries which drain to



the river below the reservoir.  However, there were no significant



mine effluents discharged to the South Fork Little Conemaugh River



above the community of Beaverdale.




South Fork Little Conemaugh River, Beaverdale to Sidman



     A bore hole discharge of 289 gpm was received by the South Fork in



the community of Beaverdale.  All evidence of the shaft or slope mine



entry has been destroyed.    Considerable amounts of mine refuse






                               232

-------
are scattered about the immediate area.  The acid load carried by



this effluent (Ho. 5260) was 2,220 Ib/day.



     Mine No.'s 5100 and 5127 discharged significant acid loads



to the South Fork approximately 1.5 miles below Beaverdale.  Mine



Mo. 5100 contributed a discharge of l,kQ& gpm and carried an acid



load of more than 6 tons per day.  The effluent from this mine



drains from the original concrete portal which is still intact.



The effluent from Ho. 5127 represents cumulative seepage from the



large refuse pile associated with Mine Ho. 5100.  The acid load



contributed by the refuse area drainage was 1,176 Ib/day.



     There were no additional mine discharges below Ho.'s 5100 and



5127 and the downstream community of Sidaan.





Otto Run



     Otto Run and its principal tributary, Sulphur Creek, joins the



South Fork Little Conemaugh River in the community of Sidman.  All



sources of mine drainage were located on Sulphur Creek..  However, due



to the severity of these discharges, Otto Run is similarly affected



along its entire downstream length below the confluence with Sulphur



Creek.



     The first sources of mine drainage discharge, Mine Ho.'s



and 51*i2, are located at the very headjwaters of Sulphur Creek.



The combined acid load discharged by these two surface mines was



67 Ib/day.  Several additional surface mines and two slope mine



openings were found in the headwater areas but they were dry.
                               233

-------
     Mine No. 51^0, located in the community of Dunlo,  discharged an



acid load of 4?8 Ib/day to Sulphur Creek.   The portal to this drift



mine was dry; however, a ho gpm effluent was discharged via the air-



way.



     The largest mine discharge on Sulphur Creek was located about




0.5 mile above the confluence with Otto Run.  This effluent (No. 51510



discharged by means of a bore hole on the  north bank of Sulphur Creek.



The measured effluent was 1,730 gpm which  carried an acid load of



6,228 Ib/day.  A local surface mine operator reported this bore hole



drained a series of interconnected shaft and slope mines.  These mines



included the Dunlo, Yellow Creek, and Henrietta Mines.



     Stream sampling was conducted at the  mouth of Otto Run coincident



with the mine drainage inventory in 1968.   During this  period, (Table 28)



Otto Run at the mouth carried an acid load ranging from two to seven



tons per day (Table 29).






South Fork Little Conemaugh River, Sidman  to South. Fork



     Only two other areas of coal mining activity were  located on the



South Fork Little Conemaugh River between  the community of Sidman and



the downstream community of South Fork.



     The St. Michael Shaft Mine was located on a small  unnamed tribu-



tary which enters the South Fork near the  communities of St. Michael



and Creslo.  Both shaft entries to this mine have been  filled.  A



large diameter pipe is located near the shafts on the bank of the



unnamed tributary mentioned above.  The effluent from this bore hole

-------
 pipe was  3,272  gpm which  carried an acid  load of nearly 2U ton* per



 day.  An  additional acid  load of l,UUo Ib/day was coatributed by



 drainage  from the  extensive mine waste dump* associated with the



 St.  Michael Mine.



      A  large mine  refute  dump covering many acres is located along



 the  South Bank  of  the  South Fork just above the confluence with the



 Little  Conemaugh River.  A total of seven drift mine openings were



 located in the  vicinity of the refuse dump.  Three of these mines,



 Ho.'s 5132,  5133 and 513U are situated in such a manner that they



 drain to  the Little Conemaugh River.  Only one of the four remain-



 ing  openings contributed a discharge at the time of inspection.



This was Mine Ho. 5135 with an acid load of k6h Ib/day.



     Mine Ho.'s 5130 and 5131 are located on the north bank of the



South Fork directly across from the large refuse area mentioned



above.  The discharges from these mines are located at the same ele-



vation and separated by approximately 75 yards.   Mine Ho.  5130 con-



tributed an acid load of 9,16^ Ib/day and Mine Ho.  5131 discharged



an alkaline load of 90 Ib/day.



     Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of South Fork



Conemaugh River coincident with the mine drainage source investi-



gation  (Table 28).   During this period, the acid load carried by



the river ranged from a minimum of 37 tons per day to a  maximum of



6h tons per day (Table 29).   Other mine draiaage parameters were



also excessive.
                               235

-------
              LITTLE OONEMAUGH RIVER BELOW SOUTH KIRK






Little Conemaugh River,  South Fork to Mineral Point



     The first mine discharges located on the south bank of the



Little Conemaugh River below the community of South Fork were  from



Mine No.'s 5132, 5133 and 513^ mentioned in the preceeding section.



These are all drift mines and contributed a total  acid load of




661 Ib/day.



     A contour surface mine, approximately 2.5 miles  in length,  is



located along the south  bank of the river just downstream of the



community of South Fork.  Multiple coal seams have been mined  along



approximately one-half of the total length of this surface mine.  The



only point sources of drainage occurred from the base of the  spoil



piles.  This discharge (No. 508U) contributed an acid load of  110 Ib/day



to Bear Run.  This tributary intersects the mined  area and is  diverted



across several hundred yards of disturbed area. At the point  where



Bear Run leaves the surface mine it carried an acid load of 219 Ib/day.



The sample of Bear Run (No. 5085) was collected above the point where



the spoil pile drainage  (No, 508U) enters the tributary.



     A second large surface mine is located on the north bank of the



Little Conemaugh River below the community of South Fork.  Three dis-



charges, representing cumulative seepage, were collected at the base



of the strip mine spoil piles.  The total acid load from these sources




(No.'s 5089, 5090 and 5091) was 162 Ib/day.






Saltlick Run




     Saltlick Run drains an area of 11.U square miles and enters the
                               236

-------
Little Conemaugh River in the small community of Mineral Boint.  A



total of three underground mine discharges were located in the Salt-



lick drainage area.  These were Mine No.'s 5Q9a, 5093 and 509U.  The



acid load contributed by these discharges were 1,197 Ib/day, 135 lb/day,



and ^96 lb/day, respectively.



     Saltlick Reservoir is located near the lower end of the tribu-



tary.  This reservoir is privately owned and is used as a source of



industrial water supply for the steel mills in Johnstown.  In order




to prevent drainage inflow to the reservoir from the three sources



listed above, the mine effluents are diverted around both sides of



the reservoir and finally discharged to Saltlick Run below the reser-



voir.






Little Conemaugh River, Mineral Bpint to Johnstown



     An abandoned drift mine and a large mine refuse dump are located




on the north bank of the river just west of Saltlick Reservoir.  Drifl



Mine No. 5087 discharged an alkaline effluent of 7 lb/day and the refuse



area discharged an effluent which carried an acid load of 3»HO lb/day.



     The active Brookdale No. 77 Mine of Bethlehem Mines Corporation



is situated on the north bank of the river in the same area described



above.  At the time of inspection (August 1968), the Brookdale Mine



discharged an acid load of l,Ul5 lb/day directly to the Little Cone-



maugh River,  Treatment facilities have since been installed at this



mine.  According to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Re-



sources, the treatment is adequate and results in an alkaline discharge



with an iron concentration less than 7 mg/1.
                               237

-------
     Four significant mine discharges were located across from the



Brookdale Mine on the opposite bank of the river.  Each discharge



drains from the same area which has been mined by both surface and



underground methods.  Three of the effluents (Ho.'s 5096, 5097 and



5099) emanate from the bases of partially open drift mines.  The



acid loads from these sources were 950 Ib/day, 3**7 Ib/day and



535 Ib/day, respectively.  The fourth discharge (Ho. 5098) was



collected below the surface mined area.  The acid load from this



source was 370 Ib/day.



     Mine Ho. 5095 was the last downstream site draining directly



to the south side of the Little Conemaugh River.  The point of dis-



charge probably represents an area where underground nine workings



have broken through to the surface.  The discharge was 60 gpm and



carried an acid load of k07 Ib/day.



     Clapboard Run joins the Little Conemaugh River approximately



0.3 miles above (upstream) of the USGS gaging station at last Cone-



maugh.  Mine Ho. 's 5256 and 5257 were the only mine operations on



Clapboard Run.  A total of four openings were located in the imme-



diate area; however, only two were discharging.  Both discharging



openings appeared to have been sealed at one time.  The acid loads



discharged by Ho.'s 5256 and 5257 were 1,530 Ib/day and 1,818 Ib/day,



respectively.
                               238

-------
             LLGEND
            ABANDONED GAS  WCLL
            JMDtRGROUND MINE
            SAMPLING  POINT LOCATION
            MINt RFFUSE
            STR'P MJNE
        FIGURE  (9
UTTLE  CONEMAUOH  RIVER
    MINE  LOCATION MAP

-------
     During the course of the field study, strewn sampling was con-



ducted on the Little Conemaugh River at the USGS gage in East Cone-



•aufh.  This stream station is below all mine drainage inflow located



in the Little Conemaugh River study area.  l>uring the sampling period




(Table 28) the river carried an acid load ranging from U8.5 tons per



day to 98.5 ton* per day (Table 29).  Other mine drainage related



parameters were also excessive.





     A total of 99 discharging sources and approximately 1,UOO acres



of surface mined area were investigated during this study.  Table 30



presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading




(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams



of the Little Conemaugh River.  Table 31 presents a summary of flow



volumes and chemical loadings by source type for the 99 discharging



sources located during the study.






                        POLLUTION ABATEMENT
     As shown in Table 31, abandoned shaft mines were the principal



pollution sources In the Little Conemaugh River.  The total acid



load discharged from these shaft or slope mine sources was 109,^51



Ib/day.  Abandoned drift mines were the secondary major source type



and discharged an acid load of 32,085 Ib/day.



     Seven of the largest mine < ffluents were responsible for a



large portion of the total acid load discharged by all sources in



the Little Conemaugh River.  These seven abandoned sources include

-------






















1

2

jj
09
00
c
•H

•H 5-4
Q) 0)
0 >
OJ g
O >> J3
CO .O. 00
3
,
0) n)
C T)
n) ^
60,0
C rH
C
O
H >i
n)
1-4 TJ
n) \

O i-l
H ^
-,
rt o)

l~~l ****v.
3 JO
CO r-4



OS s-\
m >,
r-i oj n)
ctf C TJ
4J *t3 ^v
O J-l J3



JJ

^ 4J K*^
•H rt
i— -4 ^J ^Q
n) -H ^-.
4J O J3
0 
r-i
jj
•H
^
00



St
VO






%
,
00
o\
•1
in





^s.
rH
CO

r-i





00
VO
CO

st"






in
O
co






m
r-4

Q)
r-l
JJ
JJ
•H
>J
O h
jj a>
• *H
•H
U ,C
JJ 60
3
•d o)
||

JU
oovcomr-i ooomoovocMvorHinrHcMco
i-l i-4 CM r-l OCO i-lOO OOrHr-ICO
co O co CM CM r>-
r-l r-l St

vO ^^ CO st CO vO Cs| vO (^ 00 i—4 00 CD CD CD CTs i— 4 CO
«OCM CTiini-IO\COr-4vo
fM in r-l VO
•*
r-l



CD CD vO CD CD St in CD 00 f*"* ON st CD f^ vO CD vo
iH«vocM in covo st m i-i o
en CM vo o i*» m co
A «t \o * *
vo st « i— i in
CM co m


vOOOCMCOin COOstr-ISti-ir^OOCOCOvOOOi-l
st sr 00 CD i—4 r*» ON CM 00 CM vo i— I ON *^ st st
costONCM co cMOcomON i-ioor~co
Mm MA AAAA
mco vor-i r-ivosti^
** o -co i-« co
r-l . CO



ONinOrHON incomoNCMcooooN.i-icMO oococom
IAM A •*•»•*!»
st O CM Is* r-l CO CO
CM m r-i m
iH




mcovocMvo ONr>oomvovocMvocMi-iooco
stovt^tM r-iJ-
M *l H fk M
CM CO CM r-l O
CM



i-ir^OOvOCM CMCOCMStCOCOCMvOr-ICOCMCMON
ON
\£ _\J> ^ fj
rl M OJ C 3 O
O U 0) 3 (X
Pn 5 ti eg h co
PC O bO 3 J
r\ jj fj rf ^ft
JJ Jj 0) 3 i-l d H
3 ed C O P r-4 O
O 0) a) ri Cu 3 H
to PQ PQ H co co
O O O O O O
JJ JJ s JJ JJ JJ JJ
• C • r-l • • •,&!• C
f*^ ^f^ ^j j*^ |_^ flQ ^^ ^ ^J ^J pj J
u -H (2 -H o vi -H -H o) -H a a
C^tl rlS^U Vj C f-l (4 Jj (X
ClJ (4 JJ v/ \ i Q) 4J C3 4J 3 JJ C^ JJ *X
tiO o ajq) 3« & C f.

OJCQvV JJOOJ vVbOvVOOJ'HPI^C
jjjjcd I-i nj C -H 03 rt 3 rt -H nj (X o! JJ ti C
M 3 C c4 C 3 lJ C c O C M C t-i C I-H n) r
z co :=> m ;=> opQ&HOcopcopcopQcj
2U2

-------
five shaft or slope mines and tvo drift mines.   The combined acid




load discharged by these sources was 121,3kk Ib/day, about 80 percent



of the total source acid load.



     Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement program



in the Little Conemaugh River should include the seven sources men-




tioned above.  Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites



would be expected to contribute significant acid discharges.  De-



tailed engineering studies and mine effluent  sampling conducted



during an entire water year would more accurately characterize the



relative pollution contribution of each source.   Due to the magni-



tude of each discharge, it would be expected that, even when con-



sidered over a longer time period, each site would remain a major



contributor.  However, long term repetitive water quality deter-



minations may necessitate the consideration of additional sources



located elsewhere in this basin.



     The seven principal sources (listed in Table 32) located during



this initial survey provide a relative indication as to where the



major mine drainage problems occur in the study area.  Until such a



time when additional study can provide a more detailed assessment



of the problem, these seven sources can effectively serve as the first



phase or priority in a program of drainage source abatement in the



Little Conemaugh Biver.  Once drainage control has been established



at the principal source sites, the abatement program could be ex-



panded to include additional significant discharge points.
                               2U3

-------































I-l
CO

0)
I-l
XI
cd
H




































^
1 id"
(3 ^CJ
•H *s**
E >Q
3 r-l
s
>-. cd cd
AJ IW TJ
r-l ^
0) 3 Xi

rl P N-^
3 0)
0 >
BO "H

CO IX

Ju 00 ctf C *O
•J 1 f »^J ^v,^
09 a o P xi
60 B E"l Cd rH
C CD EC •••^
•H C
*o o
nj u
o
r-t 0) U
r-t 0> ><^x
0) U a 4J >S
60 4J *ri Cd
S*H i—4 *O *O
IJ Cd 1-1 "^

Cd O <5 r-t
TJ
<0
C
•H 0)
S 60

i—4 cd ^"^
cd xl 6
4J O CU
O 09 60

09
m (]}
O U

0 0
13 m





01
0.
5s
H
01
U
0
CO
•o-
CM
Is*
rf

CM
CO
CM





VO

0

"**


r-l
0
00

^•
vO





00
VO
r-t
9t
in
en






m
00
o
CM
co





fmit
m


,^-



co








09
0)
c

*
4J
y-t
•H
CM m oo  O
§ r.
<4-i cd
S 8
0




o







o






vO
co








ON
ps.










ON
*"

CO
vo
vO
M
I-l


vO
o
co
•»
in
m


r-l
st
en

r*.
co
CO




O
CO
Is-
•*
co
00
r-4





o
r^
in
co"
m
,_!





CO
CO
«
-------
     The following is a description of the seven principal sources



Mentioned above.  A listing of these sources is shown in Table 32*



The location of these nine sites are shown in Figure 20.
                                   SOURC1S



Mine No. $083



     The acid load of nearly 2k tons per day discharged by the



St. Michael Shaft Mine was the largest load encountered in the



entire Kiskiminetas River basin.  The abandoned nine is located



on a small unnamed tributary which Joins the South Fork Little



Conemaugh River near the communities of St. Michael and Creslo.



The two shaft entries to the mine have been sealed.  A large



diameter pipe is situated on the bank of the unnamed tributary



mentioned above.  The measured effluent discharged from this bore



hole pipe at the time of survey was 3,272 gpm.  Two large refuse



piles are also associated with the mine and contributed a highly



Mineralized effluent to the same small unnamed tributary.





Mine Ho. 5100



     Mine No. 3100 is located adjacent to Route 869 in the small



community of Allendale.  The 1,1*08 gpm effluent drained from the



original concrete mine portal.  This portal is still intact for



some distance into the hillside.  The drainage is piped under the



road bed and empties to the South Fork Conemaugh River.  The acid



load was 12,33** Ib/day.
                               2U5

-------




































CM
CO

a
00
H





























e
ct
01

CO
oi
C
«H
•H
0)
c
£





CI

>% !o
4J i-
oj TJ
(U -H
O U

3 ^^
OP e
co o) E
0) «H
oo &
s ^
a *

•rt R c
0) 0 C
0) C «H cd
CO M-4 4J
•^ O -H C
6 u :
0) 0) T
r-i r-i a c
« « co O
a u u
U hJ
C
cu
«
j
S i
O 1
r-i i

0
1
0) C
ft;
H



01
c
•r^
JS IZ


•K
o
£
3
O
CO b
0>
0 >

>>
at 00
IJ »-4
*O fg
•H Ql

t^ O
•o
dl 01
6 •-"
Cd 4J
C 4J
. 13
vO
O

fsT
«*



in
f_i
CM
1-1






O
o

CO





m
•
CM
r-
CM
CO
a.
g

4-*

CM
CO
O
fH
O)
c
g

M-l
•H
^1
O
o
o
i-H
in







(4
0)
5?

oO
a)

C
O
u
a>
1-1
4J
4J
3

^T
00
1^4
i-1



in
O








o
o
m
CM





CO
•*
O
5
r-<
«
i?


cd
rt


r-4
f«4
»O







Jj
at
5

3°
i
Q)
c
Q
01
r-4
4J
| i
3

o

CM
CM



O
O
m







8
CM
CM





O
in
st
00
co
a.
£

M-l
cd
X
CO
0>
CM
rM
in
(j
0)
>
£
"I

c
4)
§
CJ
0)
^4
4J
4J
•H

_y
J.4
O
fa
wf^
U
3
O
CO

v£>
t-l
ON




m
co








8
CO
CM





00
co

co
O
r-4
§
g

IM
•H
tj

O
CO
l-H
m












"ol
O)

t£j
S

(X
i-i
CO
00
CM
CM
vO




O
o
CO







o
m
00






rH
CO
O
co
1-4
«
•H
35

UH
ej
^f*.


m
1-1
m















C
3
u
3
0

^
vO
CO
i-l
r-4



m
1-4
«^







o
m
o
CM





m
CM
CM
CO
CM
CM
8
3


C0
r*

o
o\
CM
m






















«^
CO
r-4
CM























m
r-4
O*
st*
r-*
i
^









2U6

-------
                 LEGEND
           S   ABANDONED  GAS WELL
           —'   UNDERGROUND MINE
           •   SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
          ^/^  MINE REFUSE
          C^>  STRIP MINE
            FIGURE 20
    UTTLE  CONEMAUGH RIVER
PRINCIPAL SOURCE  LOCATION MAP

-------
Mine No.
     The 1UOO gpm effluent measured at this mine site (borehole) is




reported to result from the abandoned Sonman Mine.   At the time of




sampling, the acid load contributed by No. 511^ was 11,8UU Ib/day.




No additional information was obtained concerning this major dis-




charge point.






Mine No. 3129




     This mine discharge point vas another borehole from the Son-




man Mine.  The borehole may act as a common discharge point for




other underground mines interconnected with the Sonman workings.




The effluent measured at this site was 3,?8U gpm which carried an




acid load of 22,70H Ib/day.  A second discharge is located adjacent




to No. 5129.  The second discharge point (No. 5008) is an artesian




effluent from the pipe casing hole which once carried power lines




to the underground mine.  The acid load from No. 5008 was 1,601 Ib/day.






Mine No. 5130




     This drift mine was developed along the bank of the South Fork




Conemaugh River just a few feet above the level of the river.   There




is no direct access to the discharge point.  It is located along the




upstream end of the railyard situated on the South Fork Conemaugh




River.  A hillside slump is all that remains of the original opening.




The 1,039 gpm effluent is piped under the numerous rail lines and




discharges directly to the South Fork.  The acid load was 9,l6U Ib/day.
                             2U9

-------
Mine No.
     This mine was primarily responsible for the degraded water



quality found at the mouth of Otto Run, a tributary to the South



Fork Conemaugh JUver.  The discharge point is actually a borehole



loca ed in the east bank of Sulphur Creek which is, in turn, a



tributary to Otto Run.  The effluent was 1,730 gpm and carried an



acid load of 6,228 Ib/day.  A local surface mine operator reported



this borehole drained a series of interconnected shaft or slope



mines.  These mines included the Dunlo, Yellow Creek, and Henrietta



Mines.






Mine No. 5290



     The abandoned Miller Shaft Mine, located on the lower portion



of Trout Run, discharged an acid load of 11,36U Ib/day.  The dis-



charge point is located approximately 150 yards below (downstream)



the tipple.  At least two additional openings were located at the



tipple site; however, both openings are sealed and dry.  The bore-



hole discharged an artesian effluent of 2,282 gpm.
                               250

-------
      STONY CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
         251

-------
                         STONY CREEK



                   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS





1.   Stony Creek drains  an area of U66  square miles in Somerset



    and Cambria Counties.  Stony Creek and  its principal tribu-



    taries are affected in varying  degrees  by coal mine discharges



    over nearly their entire lengths.  The  drainage areas of Stony



    Creek below the community of Stoystown, Shade Creek, and faint



    Creek are the portions of the watershed most seriously affected



    by coal mine discharges. Although Quemahoning Creek is affected



    by coal mine discharges, the -water quality degradation is not as



    severe as in the other principal tributaries.





2.   A total of 199 discharging  sources and  approximately 5,700 acres



    of surface mined land were  investigated in the study area.  Dis-



    charges from coal mine sources  ranged from one to 2,6*99 CP» and



    totalled 23.7 million gallons per  day (mgd).  The total net



    acid load discharged by  the l6l sources was  97,310  Ib/day.





3.   Approximately UO coal mines were in  operation throughout the



    Stony Creek watershed at the time  of study.  A total of eleven



    mine effluents were sampled at  the active sites.  The acid



    load contributed by these sources  was 6,^30  Ib/day.  Treatment



    facilities have since been  installed at several of  the active



    mine effluents.
                             258

-------
U.  Abandoned drift mines were the major source of mine drainage



    in the Stony Creek watershed.  Shaft mines and mine refuse



    piles were also major contributors.  These three source types



    contributed a combined acid load of 8U,lU5 Ib/day, about 86



    percent of the total source acid load discharged by all 199



    sources.






5.  A total of thirteen principal sources of mine drainage dis-



    charge were located in the study area.  These sources include



    ten drift mines, two shaft mines, and one mine refuse pile.



    These 13 sources discharged a total net acid load of 6l,?6l



    Ib/day.  This represents 63 percent of the total acid load



    discharged by all 199 sources throughout the Stony Creek water-



    shed.






                     DESCRIPTION OF AREA.



     Stony Creek drains an area of U66 square miles located in



Somerset and Cambria Counties.  Stony Creek and the Little Cone-



maugh River join at Johnstown to form the Conemaugh River.



     The headwaters of Stony Creek rise near the community of



Berlin and flow generally north to Johnstown.  Principal tribu-



taries and their drainage areas are Quemahoning Creek (93.8 square



miles), Shade Creek (98.^ square miles), and Paint Creek (37.0



square miles).






                    STREAM iftTER QUALITY



     Stony Creek and its three principal tributaries are affected




in varying degree by coal mine discharges over nearly their entire
                            253

-------
lengths.  The water quality of Shade Creek and Paint Creek is



seriously degraded by mine discharges in nearly all portions of



the drainage area.  The distribution of the pollutant discharges



are such that natural downstream recovery becomes impossible and



the acid condition persists at the mouth of the tributaries.



     Quemahoning Creek above Sipesville was unaffected by nine



drainage.  Below this point the stream receives numerous pollu-



tant discharges.  Although Quemahoning Creek is degraded as a



result of mine drainage, it is the least affected portion of the



Stony Creek watershed.  A large privately owned reservoir is



located near the mouth of the creek which, after treatment, is



used for industrial water supply.



     The main stem of Stony Creek is seriously degraded by nine



drainage.  This is particularly evident in the lower half of the



watershed.  Above Stoystown, the water quality of Stony Creek



improves rapidly.  Although numerous discharge points are located



above Stoystown, the cumulative effect is limited to localized



areas of degraded water quality.  The upper area of the watershed



contains several streams which support varied forms of aquatic



life including stocked trout.



     During the course of the field study, several stream locations



were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 33» Figure 21).  These



stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine



drainage.  A summary of the stream data is presented in Table  3^.

-------
Station
Number
                                    Table 33

                     Stream water quality sampling stations

                             Stony Creek Watershed
  Sampling Period
Stream
  Location
5379

5381

5382


5383

5384


5385

5386

5475

5552

5553
Aug., Sept., Nov., 1968

Aug., Sept., Nov., 1958

Aug., Oct.,  Nov., 1968


Aug., Oct.,  Nov., 1958

Aug., Oct.,  Nov., 1968


Aug., Oct.,  Nov., 1968

Aug., Sept., Nov., 1968

Aug., Oct.,  Nov., 1968

Sept., Oct., Nov. 1968

Sept., Oct., Nov. 1968
Paint Creek

Shade Creek

Stony Creek


Quemahoning Creek

Unnamed trib. to
Stony Creek

Solomon Run

Quemahoning Creek

Unnamed trib. to
Stony Creek
Oven Run

Stony Creek
Near mouth

Near mouth

USGS gate @
Riverside

Near mouth

Near mouth


Near mouth

Above reservoir

Near mouth

Near mouth

At Stoystown
                                     255

-------
          ll
           111 •
          •x.
•s
H
       a
       01
vo CM >-H
CO 00 vO
CM
m -*  en O
sO 
r%. CM -^
•-4 rH
IA 00 CM
O rH 00
en r* oo
^r o CM
CM

CM
00 CX. >
.?<*£
ON ON O*
r-. r*. i^.
m en en
lA lA iA
00 CM lA
00 -« -1
CM CM
 iA
CO SO iA
§o o
iA iA
•tf CM
fx r-l OS
ON en CM
lA lA IA
rH CM CM
ON r-t  O
IA ^-» r^.
t-< — «
CO *n rH
IA r^ ~i
^H tn o
o> CM r*H
ON O •-»
so OO CM
rx  i-*
r-- iA rH
r-i r*. r-

OO Os sO
CM CM »-)
O> 00 O
r^ IA IA
CM r*. ON

ss
CN CM CM
en en fO
tA U~> lA
O r-( O»
CM
O oo r*
O O ON
lA CM 00
r** en so
rH rH CM
CM r-* CM

VD s£) \O
O O O
O tf> O
en o O
000
rH t^. O
CM r-t en
00 ON CM
r^ 
ins
en en f^
sss
lA iA <-
ON \O

Os O
rH O
1 vO 00
t-l i-H
00 00
CM  ON rv
r-» r-i t-t
rH O — »
CM en CM
o o o
§s^
t-l r~t r~4
ao c*i ~3
O O O
n oo 
Op 00 00
« *o «
* » o>


60 U >
5*£

•* ON
CM CM
M"\ ON
en r-<
ON ^H
IA

1^ O
ON CM
t— 1 t-t
sO O
IA en
CM en
R2
fn CM
en ON
O en
CO rH
ON 00
t-t CM
\O ON
00 f-
CM rH
ON O>
fN. OO
CO CM
-H
r^ CN*
rH
IA O
CM O
ON p*.
00 ON
S8
r«* rH
IA en
200
\p
ON ON


II
sO vO
00 OO
en en
lA u-
^ IA m

CM en oo
CM o r*
IA en **
en *o CM
en en en
so o en


o Is- * ^
lA O O
** NO en
O en 
38£
^o -o -o
l>. r*. r-
tA iA X
rH CM en
rH
CO O 1A
S rn" £
co 0 en
CM ** 
CO O Z
CM (M (M
lA IA lA
lA lA lA
lA "A IA
vO O lA
rH rH CM
VO CO f^-
l-H rH rH
SO IA 00
CM lA O
CM
en ON CM
O O rH
rH en r-t
rH rH
O f- rH
CM O rH
lA  
$8$
en en en
lA »A *A
lA lA lA
tA lA »A

-------

-------
     The sources of pollution inventoried in the Stony Creek sub-



basin were limited to those sources emanating from active or



abandoned coal mining operations.   No attempts were made to docu-



ment pollutional discharges of a different source type.  Although



mine drainage is the major source of pollution in the streams of



the Kiskiminetas River basin, pollution problems from sources other



than mine drainage do exist.  The effects upon the water quality



of the Conemaugh River, Little Conemaugh River, and Stony Creek



from steel mill and other industrial discharges were not docu-



mented.  During the course of the field study, discharges from



such sources were located along the banks of the above mentioned



streams.  This was particularly evident in the Johnstown and nearby



community areas.





                  SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE




     For description of the mine drainage sources located in the



Stony Creek watershed, the following section of this document is



divided into four separate parts.  These include main stem Stony



Creek, Quemahoning Creek, Shade Creek, and Paint Creek.  All mine



sites inventoried in the Stony Creek watershed are shown in Figure



22, following the source description section.



     During early fall of 1971, a reinvestigation of the mine



drainage sources was conducted in the Shade Creek watershed.  The



purpose of this reinvestigation was an attempt to locate sources



of mine drainage discharge which were not documented in this
                             258

-------
watershed during the initial survey.  In preparation of the Shade




Creek portion of the Stony Creek report, it was determined that an



insufficient number of sources had been found in the headwater



areas of Shade Creek.  In particular, the water quality of Dark



Shade Creek in the vicinity of Central City was degraded to a



degree which far exceeded the number of mine discharges inventoried



in that area.  The reinvestigation effort was primarily centered



around the Central City area.



     A total of twelve additional mine discharges were located in



the Central City area.'  These sources contributed a combined acid



load exceeding 6.5 tons per day.  Approximately one-half of this



acid load was discharged by the large drainway north of Central



City (see text).  Discharge No.'s 5206 thru 5217 represent the



additional sources sampled during the 1971 reinvestigation of



Shade Creek.






                         STONY CREEK



Headwater Area



     Mine No. 5513 >»s the farthest upstream source of mine drain-



age discharge in the Stony Creek watershed.  An effluent of 15 gpm



discharged from the slope opening of this mine.  The acid load re-



ceived by the headwaters of Stony Creek was 175 Ib/day.



     In downstream order, the next mine discharges were located



on Reitz Creek.  Mine No.'s 5511 and 5512 discharged a combined



acid load of 267 Ib/day.  Mine No. 5511 was a caved drift mine



and Mine No. 5512 was a drift mine which had been intersected by



a surface mine.
                            259

-------
Glades Creek



     Glades Creek drains a portion of the watershed which parallels



the Pennsylvania Turnpike.  Several surface and underground mines



have been operative immediately adjacent to the turnpike.   At the




time of survey, two drift mines were in operation.   One of these



was the Burk Coal Company on the south side of the  turnpike.  The



mine was dry when inventoried and has since been abandoned and



sealed.  The second mine was operated by Everett Snyder.  This mine



is still in operation and reportedly dry.






Rhoads Creek



     Two discharges (No.'s 5527 and 5528) contributed a combined



acid load of 231 Ib/day to Boone Run, a tributary to Rhoads Creek.



The source of these discharges was an abandoned slope mine.  Sev-



eral additional minor sources of acid discharge were located on



Rhoads Creek and tributaries to Rhoads Creek.  Two  surface mines



were in operation at the time of survey.  One of these operations



was dry and the other mine contributed an acid load of 127 Ib/day



(Mine No. 552U).






Schrock Run



     In the U.9 square mile drainage area of Schrock Run, a



total of four discharging mine sites were located.   Additional




underground and surface mines were inventoried in the Schrock



Run area; however, they were dry.  Mine No. 5516 contributed the



major portion of the mine drainage discharge received by Schrock



Run.  Mine No. 5516 is a small reclaimed area strip mine.  A
                             260

-------
60 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage along the base of



the disturbed area carried an acid load of 2^0 Ib/day.  Two sur-




face mines were in operation during the survey period and both



vere dry.






Grove Run



     A small hilltop area surface mine is located along the north



bank of Grove Run in the headwater area.  The mine is dry; however,



about UO feet below the disturbed area a 36 gpm artesian effluent




discharged to Grove Run.  The acid load carried by this discharge



was 3^6 Ib/day.






Lamberts Run



     The total acid load discharged to the 3.9 square mile drain-



age area of Lamberts Run was fkj Ib/day.  Mine No. 5520 is a



stripped out drift mine.  The major portion of the 63 gpm efflu-



ent measured at this site emanated from the area near the ori-



ginal mine portal.  The acid load carried to Lamberts Run was



193 Ib/day.  A similar effluent from Mine No. 5521 discharged an



acid load of 3l6 Ib/day.  The last discharge found in the Lamberts



Run area resulted from an active surface mine.  Settling ponds had



been constructed at this mine; however, no treatment was supplied.



The acid load was 238 Ib/day (Mine No. 5522).






Wells Creek



     Mine No. 5^27 was located near the headwaters of Wells Creek.



There are two openings to the mine and both were discharging at
                             261

-------
the time of inspection.  The combined effluent was 225 fpm which



carried an acid load of 1,215 Ib/day.



     Two underground mine discharges (No.'s 5k2k and 5^25) were



located along Wells Creek near the small community of Wells



Creek.  The 222 gpm effluent from Mine No. 5**2U discharged from



a mine which, according to a local resident, was in operation in



1895.  The acid load-carried by this discharge was WtO Ib/day.



Mine No. 5^425 was a more recent underground mine which reportedly



intersected the workings of Mine No. 5k2k.  The acid load dis-



charged by Mine No. 5^25 was 955'Ib/day.



     Several additional underground mines and several surface



mines were located in the remaining downstream areas of Wells



Creek.  However, these mines were either dry or discharged only



minor acid loads





Stony Creek, main stem



     Several surface and underground mine operations were located



along the main stem of Stony Creek between Wells Creek and the



downstream confluence of Beaverdam Creek.  The only source of



abandoned mine discharge resulted from Mine No. 5k8k.  A 27 gpn



discharge from the base of this  slumped drift opening carried an



acid load of 199 Ib/day to Stony Creek.  At the time of survey, the



only other source of mine discharge resulted from an active surface



mine operation.  The mine was located alon& the east bank of Stony



Creek (No. 5509), and contributed an acid load of 19 Ib/day.
                             262

-------
Beaverdam Creek



     The water quality in the 19 square mile drainage area of



Beaverdam Creek is only moderately affected by mine drainage



discharges.  The two discharging sources were both located near



the mouth of the tributary and contributed a combined acid load




of 259 Ib/day.



     The 36? gpm discharge from Mine No. 555^ results from the



abandoned Reading No. 3 Mine.  This effluent emerged from the



airway of the mine.  The acid load was only 66 Ib/day; however,



the discharge imparted some discoloration to Beaverdam Creek.



     Mine No. 5508 was the only other source of mine discharge



on this tributary.  An acid load of 193 Ib/day was carried by



the 95 gpm effluent from this abandoned drift mine.






Stony Creek, main stem - Beaverdam Creek to Oven Run



     Mine No. fs 5^2 and 5*4-83 are located on the east bank of



Stony Creek near the community of Kantner.  Both mine openings



are located in an area of coal loading facilities approximately



50 yards downstream from the junction of Route 30 and County Road



5^6.  The area in front of the openings was used for storage of



iJunk cars.  The combined acid load discharged by these mines was



111 Ib/day.



     Mine 5561 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek ap-



proximately 0.7 mile downstream of the two mines mentioned above.



There were several drift openings in the immediate area; however,
                             263

-------
only Mine No. 5561 had a significant discharge.   The effluent was



2k gpm which carried an acid load of 173 Ib/day.



     A series of drift mine discharges were located along the east



bank hillside downstream of Mine No. 55&1.  These mines included



No.'s 5U8l, 5^85, and 5^6.  The discharges measured at No.'s 5^5



and 5^36 drained from the portal and airway to a small semi-active



drift mine.  The mine had been closed for failure to provide treat-



ment of the drainage; however, there were numerous loaded mine cars



in front of the portal.  The combined acid load discharged by No.'s




51*85 and 5U86 was lJ+3 Ib/day.






Oven Run



     Although only four sources of mine drainage discharge were



located in the seven square mile drainage area of Oven Run, the



water quality of the small tributary was seriously affected by



coal mine drainage.  Cumulative seepage from the base of a re-



claimed surface mine was responsible for the major portion of the



acid load discharged to Oven Run.  This was Mine No, 5^79 and con-



tributed an acid load of 353 Ib/day.  Several surface mines were in



operation but were dry at inspection.  The active underground Solar



No. 2 and No. 3 Mines operated in the Oven Run drainage area, but



were dry at inspection.  A third drift mine was operated by the



Shubert and Kraylick Coal Company.  The mine was dry at inspection



and since that date has been closed.



     Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Oven Run coin-



cident with the mine inventory survey.  At this time, Oven Run at



the mouth, carried an acid load ranging from 1500 Ib/day to 2200



Ib/day (Table 3^, Station No. 5552).




                            26U

-------
Stony Creek, main stem - Oven Run to Fallen Timber Run



     Five surface mines and at least 10 underground mine openings



were located on a small unnamed tributary to Stony Creek which



joins the main stem approximately 0.7 mile below Oven Run.   The



major source of mine drainage discharge in this area resulted



from Mine No. 5^77.  This mine is located at the headwaters of



the tributary and discharged an acid load of ^37 Ib/day.  The re-



maining mine operations were either dry or contributed only neg-




ligible acid discharges.



     A large refuse pile from the old underground Wilber Mine is



located on the east bank of Stony Creek just below the mouth of



the unnamed tributary mentioned above.  The principal portion of



the Wilber Mine discharge (lUl gpm) was piped under Route 53 to



the preparation facility of the Solar Fuel Company.  A portion of



this discharge was lime treated by Solar Fuel Company for use in



their facility.  The pre-treatment acid load in this effluent



(No. 5**6U) was 1,2UU Ib/day.  A second untreated discharge of 8 gpm



also discharged from the Wilber Mine.  This was discharge No.  5^65



which carried an acid load of 69 Ib/day.  According to a salvage



operator at the Wilber Mine, who once "pulled pillars" in the Wil-



ber Mine, the entire discharge from the mine was at one time piped



under Route 53.  However, due to a roof fall within the mine, a



portion of the discharge is diverted and is not piped under the



road bed.  A third discharge (No. 5^71) was attributed to seepage



from the refuse pile at the Wilber site.  Although the cumulative
                            265

-------
seepage totalled only 3 gpm, the acidity concentration was 25,000 mg/1




with a resultant acid load of 900 Ib/day.




     Ten drift mine openings were also located along the west bank




hills adjacent to this section of Stony Creek.  However, all of




these mines were dry.






Fallen Timber Run




     Two surface mines and two underground mines were located in




the 2.5 square mile drainage area of Fallen Timber Run.  All of




these operations were abandoned and dry.  However, small seepage




increments from the surface mines contributed an undetermined




amount of mine drainage to Fallen Timber Run.






Stony Creek, main stem - Hooversville to Hollsopple




     An unnamed tributary, which drains the area north and east




of Hooversville, was grossly polluted by acid mine drainage.




Mine No. 5^57 was the first of three major discharges located on




this tributary.  The 120 gpm effluent from Mine No. 5^57 resulted




from a point of intersection between a surface and underground mine.




The underground mine was reportedly the Baker Whitely No. 2 Mine.




The acid load carried by the discharge was 6U8 Ib/day.




     Mine No. 5^56 is located on the opposite bank of the tribu-




tary just a short distance downstream from Mine No. 5^57.  The 215




gpm discharge at this site emerged from the base of a slumped drain-




way adjacent to  a  large abandoned mine tipple.  This discharge




drains from the Whitely No. 1 Mine.  The original portal to this
                              266

-------
mine  is located a short distance downstream of the tipple but was



bricked shut and dry.



     The third major discharge on this tributary resulted from



the Knickerbocker No. 1 mine located near the mouth of the tribu-



tary.  This was Mine No. 5^55 which discharged an effluent of 180



gpm from the still open drift mouth.



     An acitive drift mine was in operation near the headwaters of



this tributary.  This was the George Hritz Mine which is located



in the base of a strip mine high wall.  A minimal amount of seep-



age {l gpm) was observed at the time of inspection.  However, this



seepage appeared to result more from the strip mine than from the



underground mine.  The mine is still active and reportedly dry.





     Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of this unnamed



tributary coincident with the mine inventory survey.  During this



period, the tributary at mouth carried an acid load ranging from



1,700 Ib/day to 2,000 Ib/day (Table 33, Station No. 538U).





     Mine No. 5^66 is located on another unnamed tributary to



Stony Creek.  The acid load discharged by this mine was 3*
-------
     Five additional discharging mines were located in the area



downstream of the above mentioueu mines.  Three of these were in



the vicinity of Blough, one at Landstreet, and one near Hollsopple.



However, none of these mines contributed significant acid loads to



Stony Creek.





Stony Creek, main stem - Hollsopple to mouth of Shade Creek



     The only major source of mine drainage discharge along this



section of Stony Creek resulted from Mine No. 5504.  This drift



mine is located at the tip of a one mile contour surface mine.



The surface mine has not intersected the drift mine portal; how-



ever, it has probably created points of intersection between the



two operations along a>he face of the hill.  The discharge measured



at the mine opening was 270 gpm which carried an acid load of 1,037



Ib/day.





Stony Creek, main stem - Shade Creek to Rdnt Creek



     Mine No. 5502 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek



just below the confluence of Shade Creek.  A series of three drift



mines were located along the face of the hillside.  Two were dry



and the other contributed a discharge of U20 gpm which carried an



acid load of 3,830 Ib/day.



     Downstream of Mine No. 5502 a contour surface mine was located



on an unnamed tributary to Stony Creek.  Although there were no



direct discharges emanating from the surface mine, the tributary
                             268

-------
was affected by cumulative seepage which occurred at the base of



the disturbed area.  A sample collected below the mine indicated



that the tributary carried an acid load of 256 Ib/day (No. 5503).



     On the west bank of Stony Creek, two mine openings were lo-



cated on the steep hill slope several hundred feet above the



stream.  The openings apparently represent points where the under-



ground mine broke through to the surface.  The 130 gpm effluent



(No. 5*<-2l) spreads over a wide area destroying all trees and veg-



etation as the drainage cascades down the hillside.  The acid load



contributed by this source was 87^ Ib/day.



     Mine No. 5501, located on the east bank, is similar to Mine



No. 5U21 mentioned above.  Mine No. 5501 is located on the hill-



side approximately 200 vertical feet above stream level.  The



acid load carried by the 90 gpm effluent was 386 Ib/day.



     A small dam is located on Stony Creek approximately 1.5 miles



above the confluence with Baint Creek.  At this site, water is with-



drawn from Stony Creek and subjected to lime neutralization.  The



treated water is then piped via large culverts through the surround-



ing hillsides for industrial use in Johnstown.





Stony Creek| main stem - Baint Creek to Bens Creek



     The first acid load discharged to Stony Creek below the con-



fluence of Paint Creek emanated from one of the several tunnels



which carries water from the various areas of the Stony Creek



watershed to the steel mills in Johnstown.
                            269

-------
     Source No. 5^20 is located on the west bank of Stony Creek



less than one mile below the confluence of Paint Creek.   Entrance



to the tunnel is prohibited by an iron gate.  At the base of the



gate an iron discolored discharge of 10 gpm was sampled.   The



acid load of this effluent was 26 Ib/day.



     Several underground mine discharges were located on an un-



named tributary which enters Stony Creek at Ingleside.  Mine



No.'s 53W* and 53^6 discharged acid loads of l6l Ib/day and 359



Ib/day, respectively.



     Three additional drift mine discharges (Mine No.'s 53^1, 53^2,



53^3) were located on the next unnamed downstream tributary to



Stony Creek.  The combined acid load of these discharges was



1,1^7 Ib/day.



     An active drift mine operated by the J & R Sales Coal Company



(formerly East Windber Coal Company) was locate 1 on the West bank



of Stony Creek directly across from the three mines mentioned above.



At the time of inventory, this mine (No. 5^22) contributed an un-



treated effluent which carried an acid load of 590 Ib/day.  At the



present time, this mine now provides treatment of its mine discharge.



     An acid load of 2,398 Ib/day was discharged to Stony Creek by



an abandoned mine opening located just downstream and on the bank



opposite from the large refuse pile operated by the Island Creek



Coal Company (formerly the Bird Coal Company).  The measured efflu-



ent from this mine (No. 5338) was 120 gpm.
                             270

-------
     A discharge of 75 gpm from the abandoned Bird Coal No.  1 Mine



on Soap Hollow was one of two remaining discharges along the Paint



Creek to Bens Creek section of Stony Creek.  At the time of sampling,



the acid load from Mine No. 5^13 was 315 Ib/day.  Approximately O.U



mile downstream, an effluent of 1,309 gpm from the active Bird No. 2



Mine was discharged to Soap Hollow.  At the time of sampling, this



discharge carried an acid load of U,63^ Ib/day.  However, according



to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, this mine now



provides adequate treatment of its mine drainage.





Bens Creek



     The major portion of the mine drainage discharged to the Bens



Creek watershed is received by the South Fork of the tributary.  A



total of eight discharges were located near the headwaters of the



South Fork just north of the community of Jerome.  All of the dis-



charges emanated from abandoned sites.  The total acid load dis-



charged by the eight sources was 3,527 Ib/day.  Mine No.'s 5^07



and 5^H> abandoned drift mines, contributed the major portion of



this acid load.  The acid loads were 909 Ib/day and 2,231 Ib/day,



respectively.



     The only other source of mine drainage discharge located in



the Bens Creek watershed was found on the main stem of the tribu-



tary just below the confluence of the North and South Forks.  Mine



No. 5^0U was an abandoned drift mine adjacent to Route 219.   The
                            -271

-------
acid load discharged to Bens Creek was 180 Ib/day.






     Stream water quality determinations were conducted on Stony



Creek at the USGS gage at Riverside.   During the sampling period,



Stony Creek carried an acid load ranging from 9,50U Ib/day to



3^2,792 Ib/day.





Stony Creek, east bank - Bens Creek to Mouth




     Mine No.'s 5335, 5336, and 5337 are located along the east



bank of Stony Creek almost at stream level.  It appears that these



discharges represent points where underground mines broke through



to the surface for either the installation of an air way or as a



means of dewatering the mine.  The acid loads discharged by these



three sources were 69 Ib/day, l6l Ib/day, and 28 Ib/day, respectively.



     Below the area described above, Stony Creek has been channel-



ized along its remaining downstream length.  Several large acid dis-



charges were located along the base of the channelization project.



At several of the discharge points the remains of old mine openings



could be located on the hillside above Stony Creek.  However, at



several sites, particularly in the greater Johnstown area, no in-



dication of the original mine opening was found.  At these sites,



the mine drainage emerged from concrete drainways at the base of



the channelized stream bed.  Such discharges included No.'s 5330,



5331 and 533*1.  The combined acid load of these effluents was



      Ib/day.
                             272

-------
     The largest acid discharge in this section of Stony Creek



was the 3,312 Ib/day load from Mine No. 5333.  A discharge of



W30 gpm was measured at the base of a caved drift mine opening.



There are actually two openings at this site; however, the second



opening was dry.





Stony Creek, west bank - Bens Creek to Mouth



     Three alkaline effluents were sampled from drainways along



the base of the channelized stream bed on the west bank of Stony



Creek near Roxbury.  Th^ exact origin of these effluents is not



known.  These three sources (No.'s 5^17, 5*H8, 5^19) discharged



a combined alkaline load of U33 Ib/day.



     No. 5Hl6 contributed an acid load of 203 Ib/day to Stony



Creek.  The effluent was collected from a drainway near stream



level.  The exact origin is unknown but assumed to result from



an underground mine.



     The largest acid load in the entire U66 square mile drainage



area of Stony Creek was found along the west bank of the stream



almost directly across from Point ftirk in downtown Johnstown.  On



the west bank hillside, a series of three sealed mine openings



were located.  The mines are dry at the seal; however, about 75



feet below one of the seals a 630 gpm effluent discharged to Stony



Creek.  At the time of sampling, the acid load was 26,838 Ib/day



(Mine No. 5*U5).
                             273

-------
                      QUEMAHONING CREEK





     Quemahoning Creek drains a 93.8 square mile area on the west



side of the Stony Creek watershed.  The water quality of Quemahoning



Creek is affected by numerous mine discharges throughout the drain-



age area.  However, the water quality of this tributary is less



severely degraded than the water quality in other areas of the



Stony Creek watershed,,





Quemahoning Creek, headwaters area



     One abandoned underground mine was located at the very head-



waters of Quemahoning Creek north of Somerset.  The mine was com-



pletely caved, grown over, and dry.  There were no additional



mines in the headwater area above the small community of Harrison



(Quecreek).



     Mine No. 5399 discharged an acid load of 917 Ib/day to Que-



mahoning Creek at Harrison.  The 235 gpm effluent flows from a



drainage pipe adjacent to the mine tipple and loading area.  The



area behind the old mine has been surface mined.  The original



mine opening^ have been filled or covered by the surface mine



operation.  Another stripped out drift mine (Ho. 5^00) was located



almost directly across from Mine No. 5399.  The acid load discharged



to the receiving tributary was 15 Ib/day.  A dovered shaft opening



Mas located approximately 0.8 mile upstream of Mine No. 5399.  No



additional information concerning this opening was available at



the time of survey.
                             syt

-------
Quemahoning Creels-Harrison to Acosta



     A total of seven drift mine openings were located along the



west bank of Quemahoning Creek between the communities of Harrison



and Acosta.  These openings were all located at the base of the



hillside and were dry at the time of inspection.



     Five surface mines and one drift mine opening were found



along the east bank of the creek.  The surface mines were dry



and the one drift mine (Mo. 5397) discharged an acid load of 51



Ib/day.





Quemahoning Creek, Acosta to North Branch



     Both surface mines and underground mine openings were lo-



cated along this section of Quemahoning Creek.  Four of the drift



mines were discharging at the time of inspection.  Mine No.'s 5398



and 539U were located along the main stem of Quemahoning Creek and



discharged a total acid load of only 11 Ib/day.  Mine No.'s 5395



and 5396 were located on an unnamed tributary to Quemahoning Creek.



The acid loads discharged by these mines were 20 Ib/day and 75 Ib/day,



respectively.





North Branch



     Thirteen drift mines and approximately 12 surface mines were



located in the 25 square mile drainage area of North Branch.  In



addition, there may have been several shaft mine entries in the



area.  All of these mine operations, both surface and underground,



were dry at the time of inspection.
                            275

-------
Qucmahoning Creek, North Branch to Beaverdam Creek

     There were no significant discharges of mine drainage along

this section of Quemahoning Creek.  The large slope or shaft mine

at Jenners was dry.



Beaverdam Creek

     Mine drainage discharges in the Beaverdam Creek area were

limited to three minor sources near the headwaters of the stream.

Mine No. 5555 was a combination mine.  A drift opening was at one

time located in the Highwall of an abandoned surface mine.  Both

the strip pit and underground mine opening were flooded.  A one

gpm effluent was discharged from the base of a slumped drift
   1
opening at Mine No. 5557.  The combined acid load discharged by

Mine No.'s 5555 and 5557 was only 8 Ib/day.

     The 12 gpm effluent sampled at Strip Mine No. 5556 represented

a treated discharge.  Two seepage areas had occurred below the dis-

turbed area.  At the time of inspection, the coal company had chan-

neled this drainage to a series of small impoundments for treatment

with soda ash.  After treatment the final effluent still carried an

acid load of 91 Ib/day.


Quemahoning Creek, Beaverdam Creek to Roaring Run

     Old Stoughton Lake is located at the mouth of Beaverdam Creek.

This tributary feeds the lake which, in turn, subsequently dis-

charges to Quemahoning Creek.  There is no visible sign of mine
                             276

-------
water inflow to Stoughton Lake.  However, the lake appears visually



affected by mine drainage.  A local resident reported that the lake



is fed by a sub-surface artesian discharge emanating from the near-



by Boswell Mine.  The Somerset 15 minute topographic map indicates



another mine opening was at one time located in the immediate vi-



cinity of what is now Stoughton Lake.  An estimated overflow of



250 gpm from the lake discharged to Quemahoning Creek.  This ef-



fluent (No. 5559) had an acidity concentration of 255 mg/1 and




carried an acid load of 765 Ib/day.



     There were no additional sources of mine drainage discharge



along this section of Quemahoning Creek.  Several underground



mines, including the Boswell Mine, and one surface mine were in-



spected in the area but were dry.






Roaring Run



     A recently surface mined area near the headwaters of Roaring




Run discharged an acid load of 133 Ib/day (No. 5558) to the tribu-



tary.  The 90 gpm discharge resulted from spoil pile seepage and



drainage from the open pit.  Treatment facilities had been con-



structed; however, the drainage was by-passing the facility.



     Discharge No.'s 5376 and 5560 are located near the mouth of



Roaring Run.  The discharges do not flow directly from a mine site



but are small artesian discharges along the bank of roaring Run.



A local resident reported that there were numerous "seeps" in the



immediate area and these discharges were responsible for the dis-



coloration observed in the lower reach of Roaring Run.  The acid
                             277

-------
loads from discharge No.'s 5376 and 5560 were 65 Ib/day and 30 Ib/day,




respectively.



     A small drift mine, operated by Mike Budzina,  was located



near the mouth of Roaring Run. The mine was dry at  inspection.  The



mine is presently still in operation and reportedly dry.






Quemahoning Creek, below Roaring Run



     Only one source of mine drainage discharge was located along



Quemahoning Creek below Roaring Run and above the point where



Quemahoning Creek empties into Quemahoning Reservoir.  The drain-



age originated from a water well located below a surface mined



area.  Prior to mining of the area, this well served as a water



supply; however, the quality of the water was affected by the



surface mining.  At the time of sampling, the 18 gpm discharge



carried an acid load of ihQ Ib/day (No. 5375).






 Twomile Run
     Twomile Run is one of three tributaries which form Quemahoning



Reservoir.  Both surface and underground mine operations were loca-



ted in the Twomile Run drainage area.  A total of five mine dis-



charges contributed a total source acid load of 313 Ib/day.  Mine



No.'s 5387 and 5388 discharged the major portion of this load.



Mine No. 5387 contributed an acid load of 78 Ib/day.  All that



remains of the original drift portal is a slump in the hillside.
                            278

-------
An acid load of 1^9 Ib/day was discharged by Mine No. 5388.  The



source of this 10 gpm effluent was two slumped drift mine openings.



The sample represents cumulative seepage collected below the old



openings.





Higgins Run



     Higgins Run is the third tributary which empties into Que-



mahoning Reservoir.  Coal mine operations were almost totally ab-



sent in this 5.8 square mile drainage area.  Only one mine operation



was located and this mine produced an alkaline effluent.  This was



Mine No. 5377 which contributed an alkaline load of 13 Ib^/day.





Quemahoning Creek below Reservoir



     The only mine sites located below Quemahoning Reservoir were



on an unnamed tributary which enters Quemahoning Creek just above



its confluence with Stony Creek.  Several underground mines were



inspected on this tributary near the community of Jerome; however,



they were dry.





                         SHADE CREEK





     Shade Creek drains a 98.U square mile area on the east side



of the Stony Creek watershed.  The water quality of main stem



Shade Creek is seriously affected by coal mine discharges over



its entire length.  Shade Creek is formed by the confluence of



its two principal tributaries, Clear Shade Creek and Dark Shade



Greek.  Clear Shade Creek is unaffected by coal mine discharges



while Dark Shade Creek received numerous mine drainage discharges.
                             279

-------
                      DARK SHADE CREEK






Headwaters area



     Dark Shade Creek is formed by the confluence of Shingle Run



and Coal Run.  There were no coal mine operations on Shingle Run.



However, several surface mines and one underground mine were lo-



cated at the very headwaters of Coal Run near the community of



Gahagen.  The opening to the underground mine at Gahagan has



caved and there was no drainage at this point.  Although the




refuse pile from this mine is in continual contact with Coal Run,



the water quality of the stream was not seriously affected.  A



large surface mine is located on the east bank of Coal Run approxi-



mately two miles downstream of Gahagen.  This surface mine was in-



active; however, refuse from a nearby coal preparation plant was



trucked to the surface mine and buried in the previously unreclaimed



strip cuts.  A drift mine operated by the J & R Sales Company was



also associated with the preparation plant.  This mine did not con-



tribute any discharge to Coal Run.



     The first source of drainage to enter Dark Shade Creek resulted



from a coal refuse disposal area.  This 30 gpm effluent entered the



main stem a short distance below the confluence of Coal Run and



Shingle Run.  This refuse is trucked to the disposal site from



another preparation plant located in Central City.  The acid load



discharged to Dark Shade Creek was 1,836 Ib/day (No. 521?).  This



single effluent was responsible for a complete reversal in the
                             280

-------
physical appearance of Dark Shade Creek.  Above this point, the



stream bed was clear.  However, below the point of drainage inflow



the stream bed as well as the stream banks were grossly discolored.





Dark Shade Creek, Central City area



     A large abandoned mine effluent of 875 gpm was located on



Dark Shade Creek in the community of Central City.  This effluent



drains from a culvert on the property associated with the prepara-



tion plant which still operates in Central City.  The large mine



at this site has been abandoned; however, surface mines in the



general area truck coal to this site for preparation prior to



loading in rail cars.  A local resident reported that this drainage



emanated from the Franklin No. h mine.  The drainage enters Dark



Shade Creek directly behind the Central City Fire Station.  The



acid load was U,515 Ib/day (Mine No. 5293).





Dark Shade Creek, below Central City



     The largest source of mine drainage discharge in the Shade



Creek watershed is located on Dark Shade Creek only a short dis-



tance below the mouth of Little Dark Shade Creek.  At this point,



a 2,889 gpn effluent was located in a somewhat swampy area between



the railroad tracks and the stream.  The effluent drains from a



concrete structure located at ground level approximately two feet



in height and eight feet in width.  The origin of this discharge



is unknown but it has obviously been constructed in order to drain



a nearby mine.  The acid load carried to Dark Shade Creek was



6,93^ Ib/day (Ho. 5215).
                            281

-------
Laurel Run



     Laurel Run enters Dark Shade Creek a short distance below



Mine Ho. 5215 described above.   According to a local resident, a



drift mine on the south bank of this tributary was originally



sealed by the Works Progress Administration.  However, the area



was reaffected by later surface mine operations.  At the time of



inspection, this U5 gpra effluent (Mine No. 5282) discharged an



acid load of 13^ Ib/day to Laurel Run.  An active drift mine op-



erated by the Ripple Coal Company was located on Beaverdaia Run, a



tributary to Laurel Run.  At the time of inspection, this mine was



dry and since that date the mine has closed and still remains dry.



     Two surface mine discharges were also located on Laurel Run.



A 95 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage from strip mine



spoil piles carried an acid load of U50 Ib/day to Laurel Run (Mine



No. 5283).  A second surface mine effluent discharged an acid load



of 97 Ib/day (Mine No. 528^).  A drift mine operated by the Horse-



shoe Coal Company was in operation in this general area.  At the



time of inspection, the mine was dry.  According to information



supplied by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources,



this mine has now been closed and remains dry.





     There are numerous refuse areas along main stem Dark Shade



Creek and along State Route 160 which generally parallels the



stream in this area.  Much of the area is also quite swampy and



in many areas this refuse has been scattered throughout the swamp



areas.  As a result of leaching from these refuse areas, there are
                             282

-------
numerous small impoundments of highly acid water.   In places, por-



tions of Laurel Run are also diverted through and around the refuse



and swamp areas.  Several of the small impoundments discharged



highly acid effluents.  No. 5211 represented t.uch a discharge.



This 20 gpm effluent drained to Laurel Run above the point where



the stream runs through the swamp area.  The acid load was 2,880



Ib/day.  A similar effluent was located just below the mouth of



Laurel Run on the east bank of Dark Shade Creek.  At this point,



a 15 gpm effluent discharged from a four inch pipe which carried



impounded drainage under Route 160.  The acid load contributed  by



this discharge was 977 Ib/day (Ho.
Dark Shade Creek, Cairnbrook area



     Below the confluence of Laurel Run an abandoned mine effluent



of 200 gpm discharged to Dark Shade Creek.  The opening has been



closed and the drainage emerges from the base of the sealed open-



ing.  This was Mine No. 529^ which carried an acid load of 677 lb/



day.



     An effluent of 23 gpm was collected at the base of the large



refuse pile at Cairnbrook.  This effluent represents cumulative



seepage about the base of the refuse pile.  The acid load from this



source was 121 Ib/day (No. 5213).





Dark Shade Creek, Reitz area



     A series of mine effluents were located along the east bank
                             283

-------
of Dark Shade Creek north of the small community of Reitz.   It



appears that underground mines have operated in three separage



coal seams and in addition, the upper seam has also been surface



mined.  Only one of these effluents, No.  5207» was associated



with the surface mine.  The acid load was only 8 Ib/day.  The



other four discharges, Mine No.'s 5206, 5208, 5209, and 5210



were associated with abandoned drift mines.  The combined acid



load from these four sources was 306 Ib/day.





Miller Run



     Miller Run is a tributary to Dark Shade Creek and joins the



stream just above the confluence of Dark Shade Creek with Clear



Shade Creek.  An active air fen was located near the headwaters



of Miller Run but it had no affect upon the water quality of



Miller Run.  One active and one abandoned surface mine were in-



spected in the general upstream area, but were dry.  However,



the water quality of Miller Run is immediately degraded over its



remaining downstream length as a result of several discharges



which occurred on the west bank of the tributary.  A total of



four discharges were located at a combined surface and underground



mine site.  The surface mine is approximately 1.5 mile in length



and contains several drift mine openings.  In addition, the south-



east tip of the surface mine was active.  The combined source acid



load measured at this s'te was 319 Ib/day.  Mine No. 528? was an



active drift mine which contributed a small portion (15 Ib/day) of
                            28U

-------
the total 319 Ib/day acid load.  This drift mine has installed a



small treatment facility and produces an alkaline effluent.



     The Solar Fuel No. k mine also operates in the general area



described above.  lib discharge was collected from this mine at



the time of inspection.  According to State information, the



Solar Fuel No. k mine has a discharge and provides adequate



treatment.'



     Below the area of mine discharges described above, Miller



Run had pH and conductivity values of 3.1 and 1,000 micromhos/cm,



respectively.



     Several surface mines and an abandoned underground mine



were located near the mouth of Miller Run.  However, these mines



contributed no drainage to Miller Run.





                      CLEAR SHADE CREEK





     Clear Shade Creek is unaffected by coal mine discharges.



The only mine site located within the 31.U square mile sub-watershed



area was a surface mine high on the hillside along the south bank



of the tributary.  This surface mine also extends around the face



of the hill and into the Dark Shade Creek drainage area.  Most of



this surface operation had been reclaimed and only a small active



segment had not been reclaimed.





                         SHADE CREEK





     Discharge No. 51t03 represents the first source of mine
                             285

-------
drainage inflow to Shade Creek below the confluence of Dark Shade
Creek and Clear Shade Creek.  The 2k gpm effluent actually repre-
sents the entire flow of a small wet weather tributary to Shade
Creek.  The upper end of the tributary was clear but near its
confluence with Shade Creek it became noticeably discolored.  The
immediate area has been deep mined and perhaps some seepage is
responsible for the idiscoloration of the intermittent tributary.
The load discharged to Shade Creek was alkaline.
     The discharge from Mine No. 5289 apparently resulted from a
very old and covered drift mine.-  The only remaining evidence to
suggest the presence of the mine is a refuse pile.  A 12 gpm ef-
fluent emanating from the general area of the refuse pile carried
an acid load of 31 Ib/day.
     Discharge No. 5^02 contributed an acid load of 72 Ib/day to
Shade Creek.  This effluent is actually another small intermittent
tributary, similar to No. 5^03, which becomes discolored near its
confluence with Shade Creek.

Roaring Fork
     Roaring Fork was unaffected by coal mine discharges over most
of its drainage area.  In fact there were no coal mine operations
above the small community of Arrow.  At this point, Roaring Fork
exhibited pH and conductivity values of 7.6 and 60 micromhos/cm,
respectively.  An abandoned and caved drift mine at Hagevo con-
tributed the first source of mine drainage pollution in the Roaring
Fork drainage area.  The acid load discharged by this source (Mine
No. 5551) was 165 Ib/day.  At the time of survey, there were several
                             286

-------
active surface mines in the Roaring Fork drainage area; however,



they were dry.  On* additional underground mine opening was lo-



cated, but it was also dry.



     An active drift mine operated by Desort Coal Company was lo-



cated nc r the mouth of Roaring Fork on the north bank of the



tributary.  The mine vas dry.





Shade Creek below Roaring Fork



     Two active drift mine operations were located on an unnamed



tributary which enters Shade Creek on the west bank just north of



Hillsboro.  One of these mines was the Dalton Run No. 2 mine.  The



active portal was dry; however, a 20 gpm effluent discharged from



a nearby caved drift opening.  This was Mine No. 5281 and the acid



load was 91 Ib/day.



     The second active mine was operated by the Potochar and



Potochar Coal Company.  The operation was dry at inspection and



according to information supplied by the Pennsylvania Department



of Environmental Resources, the mine is still active and dry at



this time (fall 1971).



     Several additional drift mine openings were found along the



west bank of Shade Creek below the area mentioned above.  However,



these operations were dry at the time of inspection.



     Four sources of abandoned mine drainage were located on an



unnamed tributary which enters Shade Creek on the east bank immedi-



ately below the mouth of Spruce Run.  A contour surface mine extends



along the length of this unnamed tribertary.   Underground openings have




also been developed within this surface mined area.   Discharges  from the
                            287

-------
unreclaimed strip mine spoil piles and drainage from the drift



openings contributed a total source acid load of 105 Ib/day.






Spruce Run



     The water quality of Spruce Run is degraded over nearly  its




entire length as a result of seepage areas occurring at the base



of several surface mines.  There were no significant point dis-



charges at the time of inventory on Spruce Run,  However, the




water quality of the tributary gradually deteriorates to the  point



where the mouth of Spruce Run exhibited a pH value of 3.U. On6



drift mine was operated by the Hoffman Coal Company.  The mine  was



dry when inspected and has since ceased operation.






Shade Creek below Spruce Run



     A long contour surface mine is located along the south bank



of Shade Creek below the mouth of Spruce Run.  This surface mine



is in the vicinity of the abandoned No. 38 Mine of the Berwind



White Coal Company.  An active drift mine was in operation within



the surface mine.  Two discharges were collected from separate



drainage points emanating from this mine.  The total acid load



discharged to Shade Creek was 93 Ib/day.  Several additional  dry



mine openings were found in the vicinity of the surface mine.




These openings may have been part of the original No. 38 mine.



     The mines described above were the last downstream sites



found along the south bank of Shade Creek.  There were no mine



sites on the north bank of Shade Creek below Spruce Run.
                             288

-------
     At the time of survey, Shade Creek at the mouth carried an



acid load ranging from 2U,373 Ib/day to U3,35^ Ib/day.  (Table 31*,



Station No. 538l).





                         BAINT CREEK





     Much of the 37 square mile drainage area of Paint Creek has



been subjected to extensive coal mine operations.  Several of these



operations were large underground mine complexes operated by the



Berwind White Coal Company.





Headwaters Area



     The water quality in the headwaters area of Paint Creek was



affected by an acid load of 292 Ib/day resulting from cumulative



seepage about the base of a strip mine;  This was Mine No. 530U.



The strip mine intersects the drainage divide separating the



Little Conemaugh River and the Stony Creek drainage areas.  Addi-



tional surface and several drift mines were located in this head-



water area.  However, these mines were dry or contributed only



minor acid loads.





Paint Creek-main stem



     Four mine drainage discharges were located within a contour



surface mine along the south bank of Paint Creek.  This mine is



approximately four miles in length and crosses Babcock Creek.  The



four discharge points all represent points of intersection between



surface and underground mines.  In addition to these sources, there
                            289

-------
were many other points of intersection which were dry at the time



of inspection.  The combined acid load discharged by the four



sources (No.'s 5306, 5307, 5309, 5310) was 593 Ib/day.



     The abandoned No. h2 mine of the Berwind White Coal Company



is located along the north bank of Paint Creek upstream of Bab-



cock Creek.  All the mine facilities have been removed or de-



stroyed and only the sealed portal indicates the presence of



Mine No. ^2.  A second opening to this mine was located on the



south bank of Paint Creek in another (higher) coal seam.  This



portal was destroyed by the surface mine described above.  At



the time of inventory an active surface mine was in operation



along the north bank of Paint Creek below Mine No. U2; however,



the operation was dry.



     The Berwind White No. 36 mine was located along the bank of



Paint Creek just east of the town of Windber.  At least six under-



ground mine openings, including a sealed portal, and several large



refuse piles are associated with the No. 36 complex.  Two of the



mine openings contributed significant acid discharges to Paint



Creek. These were Mine No.'s 5311 and 5312.  The combined acid



loads were 536 Ib/day.





Seese Run



     Seese Run is one of the three major tributaries to Paint



Creek.  Three underground mines and one combination surface and



underground mine were located in the Seese Run drainage area.  The
                            290

-------
combination mine was the only source of drainage.  At this site, a



15 gpm effluent discharged from what remained of a drift opening



intersected by the surface operation.  The acid load from Mine




No. 531^ was 97 Ib/day.






Weaver Run



     Contour surface mines are located along both banks of Weaver



Run in the headwaters area.  These mines have intersected older



underground operations and additional drift mine openings were



developed in the highwall of the surface mine.  Portions of the



disturbed surface area have been reclaimed and other areas have



been abandoned without reclamation.  A combined acid load of



61*3 Ib/day was discharged by four sources within this area.  These



were No.fs 5315, 5316, 5317, and 5319.  An additional acid load of



1*7 Ib/day was discharged by a test cut area separate from the above



area.






Paint Creek



     Mine No. 5320 was the first contributing source of mine drain-



age below the confluence of Seese Run and Weaver Run with Baint



Creek.  A small refuse pile and a hillside indentation is all that



remains to mark the site of this old drift mine.  The acid load



discharged to Paint Creek was 5** Ib/day.  A contour surface mine



was located above Mine No. 5320 in a higher coal seam.  However,



at inspection, this mine was dry along its entire length.
                             291

-------
     An active drift mine was in operation along the south bank of



Faint Creek, a short distance below Mine No.  5320.   This small drift



mine was operated by the Country Club Coal Company.   The mine was dry



at inspection and is presently operating under similar conditions.



     A large abandoned mine discharge is located a short distance



below the Country Club Mine.  This was Mine No. 5380 located in a



residential area within the small community of Paint.  The measured



effluent at this sice was 956 gpm which carried an acid load of



3,556 Ib/day.





Little Paint Creek



     Little Paint Creek enters Paint Creek in the community of



Scalp Level.  Little Paint Creek is unaffected by mine drainage in



the entire portion of the drainage area above Scalp Level.  Two



abandoned air shafts were found in this area but there were no



sources of mine drainage discharge.



     The Berwind White Coal Company operated a very large mine in



Scalp Level until 1962.  At that time, ownership was transferred to



the Jandy Coal Company.  Jandy Coal operates this mine at the present



time.  This operation is primarily involved in retreat mining and not



advanced mining.  As a result, the Commonwealth does not consider



Jandy Coal responsible for the drainage emanating from the mine portal.



At the time of inspection, an 8U gpm effluent was measured.  This dis-



charge carried an acid load of 51^ Ib/day  (Mine No. 5191).  Jandy Coal



also operates the coal washery associated with this mine.  During the



course of field operations in the Scalp Level area, it was often
                             292

-------
observed that Little Baint Creek carried an excessive amount of



coal fines.  In at least one instance, these coal fines were



traced to a discharge emanating from the coal washery (No. 53^7).





Baint Creek below Little Paint Creek



     The abandoned Eureka No. 30 Mine contributed an acid load of



70 Ib/day:  This mine (No. 5322) is located along the south bank



of Faint Creek.  Mine No. 532^ is another abandoned drift mine



discharge located on the south bank.  The acid load discharged by



this source was 12k Ib/day.



     An active drift mine was in operation high on the hillside



almost directly above abandoned Mine No. 532^.  This active drift



mine was the Shade Valley No. 5 Mine.  The operation was dry at



the time of inspection.



     The Berwind White No. 37 Mine was located on the north bank



of Baiint Creek near the mouth of the tributary.  Three sources of



mine drainage discharge were located in the immediate vicinity of



Mine No. 37.  Two of these sources, No.'s 5328 and 5329> were



located along the bank of Paint Creek.  The combined acid load



from these two sources was 1,056 Ib/day.



     The third mine opening was located on an unnamed tributary



to Paint Creek.  The discharge from this partially open mine mouth



was l8o gpm which carried an acid load of 1,771 Ib/day.  (Mine



No. 5327).
                            293

-------
     Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of Paint Creek



coincident with the mine drainage inventory.  At that time, Paint



Creek carried an acid load ranging from lU,372 Ib/day to 30,055 Ib/day.



(Table 3U, Station No. 5379).




                        ACTIVE MINES





     At the time of the Stony Creek study, approximately ^0 coal



mines were active in the watershed.  The majority of these sites



were dry surface mines located in the headwater areas of the water-



shed.  A total of five active surface mines contributed drainage at



the time of inspection.  The combined acid load from these sources



was 58U Ib/day (Table 35).  All but one of these discharges repre-



sented untreated drainage emanating directly from the active area



of the operation.  Discharge No. 5556 represents a treated effluent



of cumulative seepage below a surface mined area.  The mine had



ceased operation and the area had been backfilled.  After reclama-



tion, two seepage areas had occurred below the backfilled area.



This seepage was collected and treated prior to discharge to an



unnamed tributary of Beaverdam Creek.  The acid load carried by



the treated effluent was 91 Ib/day.



     Four active underground mines contributed a total of six ef-



fluents.  Two of these mines were responsible for two separate



effluents.  The combined acid load from these six sources was



5,8U6 Ib/day.  Treatment facilities have been installed on three



of these effluents.  They include No.'s 5287, 5378, and 5*»22.

-------




























m
co

a
5
EH
































§>
n
C TJ
3 r-
0) «->
CO >-
0) n
C -d
td ^
C
O <•>
to >
H n)
•d
rH -^
CtJ X
0 v-'
H
C*
§
4) ^
b 4) >
JJ jJ n
09 Cd TE
a1 ?5
•H CO ^
•H
41
O
4)
>J CO /••
w o> >
>S "JS rH 4) B
ja « cd C -d
jj ^rt ^^
W £ 0 to f.
°rl jl*
*d *^
a) O
o *J u /-,
rH CO J . >
2 JJ to
4) -H "d
60 rH T> ^
cd cd -H rfs
C 4J O rH
jd H
-d
4)
C
Sj 0)
£ 60
rH }j <->
* 2 e
4J J3 O
O O 61
EH CO ^^
Q
CO
0 U
• 3
O O
2 CO


e
td
4)
V4
4J
CO

01
C
^
•H
4)
U
VO
ON
CO
1-4


QS
CO
Csj


Cs|
CO
CM
4,
O
rH


CM
CO
CO





fX.
r-4
C^
M
rH



00
VO
m
n
o
m






o
CO

«*"



O








^
Q)
4)

^
B
O
4J
CO
VO
CO
CM



rH
O
rH


ON
ON
co





m
\o
rH





00

co
0t
ON



O
rH
A
00







rH
CM
VO
«t
rH



ON








^
4)
2
U

4J
C
•H
O ' co r«- m
CM CM rH




«J ^ O ON
• rH



O rH r>> rH
VO rH CO






CO CM «* ON
CO O 00 O
CO CM. vO ON
rH '





O O t^ s*
00 00 f^ «^
vo co m





oo r-. o oo
ON ON ON co
m vo co









ON m 1-4 vo
O rH VO 00
rH rH rH





CM rH in r-l
rH




4>
p
U

C X
Tt C ^
td c 3 4)
fri 3 « b
K U
4) Vl
rH 4) 0) 4)
JJ CO > -O
u 4) cd cd
•H 4» Jff J2
(J CO 3 CO
r^rHr^oo^moo-*
. rH
r^



•*CMCO<)'rHOvOvOO
VO rH ^J- ,H
CM


om«*corHvooo«*vo
•^ §H st CM m m CM
rH «oocMvooNoo
OO "^ *sf VD rH ON
M M
r^ CM
rH



CMrHONOOcMCM<±ONO
invorHr^oocorHinco
ininCOrHCM r^!
4) C C O 3 *4) r^
td o! « 3 M c 4i
X 00 C « 0 3 H
CO rH (4 C O & S3
4) 4) -H E 03 01
JdMrHVlOrHrHCCO
Vl3rH(drHi-4rHa)C
ctf c0 *f*4 Q O ^ Q) »^ QJ
QJSioocoP^SoM
oo
CO




rH
CM



m
0
n





ON
VD
ON
rH
rH





O
o
vo

CO



CM
m

CO







8
CO

rH



CO

t^
4)
4)
U
CO
C
4)
(Q
iy>
i-i
0

rf
jj
3
O
CO
295

-------































/••^
*o
CO
3
C
•i-t
4J
C
O
vli

m
en

CO
r-l
XI
cd
H





























'"""S
1 cd
C -0
3 r-l
i-l *— '
CO X-N
CO >
eo cd
C -a
cd ^
60 X)
c d
c
O x->

r-i cd
T3
cd X)
4J r-l
O N-'
H
E
cd
CO <~N
rl CO >
4J 4J Cd
CO Cd *rj
00 i— ' X)
C 3 t— i
.H CO v-/
co
o
CO <•>
Jj CO >
co cd
"X, i— 1 <0 "rj
XI cd C *-*
•U T) XI
CO O rl r-l
00 H cd ^
•5 r* *

?J

i-H ^ Q) ^"1 >•
. £5 4J Cd
CO P -H T3
60 5 r-l -rj v^
cd P, nj -H xi
C ^ 4J 0 r-l
•H M O  CM







vo i— i ON co omr-if^-in
Sin vo ON CM »d" o <— i
m CM oo t^ CM j ON oo F"* en en r-»
>d* vo r^» in CM O t— i I-H ^
ONCMCMCM CMO Icnl^
n n
* en
vo r-i en CM







ON ON vO m I*»
00 ON  co > cu cd
O crj 3 O r-i CO
O CU Of rl Cfl r-l
« « <>^ CD CJ O

vO
en
00
CM


CM
vO
ON




r-l
vO
r-
oo
r-i





rH
ON
CO
oo
r-l




!-<
r-l
CM
ft
r-l
oo





o
I-l
en

ON





r-i
vo
«^-
M
VO
^j (




ON
ON
i— i

CO
I-l
cd
4J
O
H









-------
     Mine No. 5191 contributed an effluent of 84 gpm which carried



an acid load of 51^ Ib/day.  This effluent drains from the old Ber-



wind White Mine at Scalp Level.  This mine is now operated by the



Jandy Coal Company.  The Commonwealth does not consider Jandy re-



sponsible for the discharge and treatment is not required.  Dis-



charge No.'s 5296 and 5297 were collected at an active drift mine



on Dark Shade Creek.  This mine is also operating in old mine



workings and is not considered responsible for the discharge.



     One additional source of active drainage resulted from the



preparation plant operated by Jandy Coal Company at Scalp Level.



During the course of the field operations in the Scalp Level area,



it was often observed that Little Baint Creek carried an excessive



amount of coal fines.  In at least one instance, these coal fines



were traced to a discharge emanating from the coal washery (No.



53^7).  This effluent also carried an acid load of 8k Ib/day.







     A total of 199 discharging sources and approximately 5,700



acres of surface mined land were investigated during this study.



Table 35 presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and



total loadings (Ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to



receiving streams in the Stony Creek watershed.  Table 36 presents



a summary of flow volumes and chemical loadings by source type for



the 199 discharging sources.
                            297

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DAT\tiff\20017E53.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DAT\tiff\20017E53.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------
    FiGJRL 22
  STONEY  CKEE K
MINE LOCATION ^M

-------
co
f
 cd
H
       cu
       a.
       cu
       o

       ^
       o
       CO

       GO
       cfl
       O
       cu
       00
       cd
       C!
       O
             u
 C
 o

CO
6 x-v
3 >
C cti
•H 13
•^3 v-x
Q) x-v
05 >•
CU cfl
C *"CJ
cfl \
60X>
C rH
C
O <-»

M cd
•O
cd x>
i | j
o ^-*
H
x™>
cu >
4-1 Cfl
Cfl T)
i-l X>
3 rH
CO ^
CO x~
CO >•
i— 1 m cfl
cd G T3
[ 1 »TJ *^
O r4 X>
H Cfl rH
4J
CU >sx~
& U >
•H cd
rH T3 TJ
Cfl V4 "^
4J O X>
0 
00
i-H In
cd cfl x-^
4-> X! g
O O D
H CO 61
•H ^^
Q
CO
<4-l 0)
O 0
(^
• 3
O O
J3 GO






0)
a
H
cu
o
Jj
3
o
w
1— 1
CO
°1
1-1

r^
rH
in





t^
00
•.
o
m
*\
r^
VO



O
O
O
n
0
1— 1



o
cxi
rH








CO x-s
el

4J C
<4-i cd
•H XI
LI cd
Q xx'

r^. cxt rH ON in i— i oo
co ON o m i-i
r-l rH CXI CO


1 — 1 in rH CXI in ON 1 — IrH
VO O CO t"» in rH
rH rH





lA ^ OO t^* *^" O rH in
CO ON CXI CXI ON in  ft ft ft
OO CO rH CO CO rH
rH


vO r^ *^~ 00 VO cxi vO*3"
 vo




vO rH 1-4 O CXI^vO O ITl
mmoolH Q.C D.-H iHC 4Jfi COC CU Cd'H
<4H4J -H cfl -H 4J XI Cfl <4Hcfl 3cfl C O-i4J
•HO r4X> 1-1 O BX> tfl XI MH X> C CUO
Lj cQ 4J cd 4J cd O cfl X< cfl CU cd 3 (-i cd
Q >-» c/5 •^^ CO >— ' U N-' to *~* K >— ' H pn v— '

vO
CO
OO
CXI

cxi
vO
ON





rH
vO
Is-
00


rH
r^x
°1
oo
oo
rH

rH
rH
cxi
•\
r— 1
oo


o

CO
«\
px»
ON



rH
vO
•11^
ft
vO
rH



ON
ON
rH


CO
rH
td
4J
O
H








                                                                 301

-------
                     POLLUTION ABATEMEHT



     As shown in Table 36, drift mines were the principal sources



of mine drainage pollution in the Stony Creek watershed.  The



total acid load discharged from these sources was more than



67,000 Ib/day.  Abandoned shaft mines and refuse piles also con-




tributed significant acid loads.



     Including all source types, a total of 13 principal sources



of mine drainage discharge were located in the study area.  These



sources included ten drift mines, two shaft mines, and one coal



refuse pile.  These sources discharged a total acid load of



6l,76l Ib/day, about 63 percent of the acid load discharged by



all  199 sources located during this survey.



     A program  of mine drainage pollution abatement in the Stony



Creek watershed should give primary consideration to these thirteen



sources.  Although numerous and significant sources of mine drain-



age exist in the watershed, abatement of these sources without



previous or concurrent abatement of the 13 principal sources, would



not result in; a major improvement in the stream water quality of



Stony Creek.



     However, even when effective drainage control can be estab-



lished at the thirteen principal source sites, a residual acid



load of more than 35,000 Ib/day would still discharge to receiving




streams in the Stony Creek watershed.   This acid load would emanate



from the large number of unabated sites remaining in the watershed.



It would be expected that this residual acid loading would be of



such magnitude that the stream water quality of Stony Creek would
                            302

-------
remain degraded to some degree by mine discharges.  For this



reason, any remedial program designed to significantly improve



the water quality in all portions of the watershed, would have



to consider more than the 13 principal source, sites listed in



this document.



     There is insufficient stream water quality data available to



accurately predict the effects upon stream water quality as a re-



sult of source abatement.  Detailed engineering studies and long



term water quality sampling at the source sites and at selected



stream locations throughout the watershed may shift abatement



priority from the listing in Table 37.  Economic or technical con-



straints may also be responsible for a similar change.  However, the



initial emphasis can be placed upon the principal source sites until



such a time that further study can recommend the addition or dele-



tions of other sources.



     The following is a description of the 13 principal sources



recommended for abatement.  These sources are listed in Table 37



and the mine site locations are shown in Figure 23.  In the Stony



Creek watershed, all mine drainage sources which discharged an acid



load exceeding 1,000 Ib/day are  considered as principal sources„



Mine No. 5378 was an active drift mine which contributed an acid



load of U,63^ Ib/day.  Since treatment facilities have been in-



stalled at this mine, it is not considered as a principal source.
                             303

-------
§
HI
4J
CO

60
C
•H
•H
CD
O

0^



>-,
cd
T3
rN-0
4-1 i-l
1-1
T)
•rl
O i-l
< ^
1?

CO
0)
CJ
Jj ^J

o 1 cu
TJ CO CJ CJ
CU -H C
r; cu 4-< rt
^3 60 -H 4-1
M cd O O
Is* 4J -H (X 'O
CO cj cfl CO C
5 MO
0) 73 CJ
XI 0) (U
CD CU C

o e

C rt
O £X
4J 1-1
CO O
C
•r*f
PM x-s
Jj £3
O pi
i-l 60
Pn •»-'







CD
C

4-1
O
cu
a.




*
o
25
0)
C
•H
53


»
cu
cu
tJ
C cu
D 13
O! rt
,15
i-< CO
0)

rt rt
I f^
0 
CM 00
oo
M
CM







s~^
CU >s
iw cu cd
•H c i*
P4 g .2
'cu cd
'3 4-» •«
IH oj
^





•-i m
r-4 r-l
CM CM
m m


^
cu
cu
f^
cu

cd

M

^J
rt
a
m
,—j
m
^j-


0
CO











o
o

CM







<-<
CO




m
f>«*
00











0)
C
£

4-1
•H






CO
CM
m






"a
*»
C
0
4J
CO
oo
CT\
CO
CM


m
vO
vO
, r-l









O
0
00
CM







00
CM




O
CM
r-l











%
g

4-1
1






00
ro
CO
m






•8
0)
(4
CJ

4J
C
•d
CU
VO
m
m
CO


o

CO










o
o
m
r-l







CT\
CO




vO
in
ON











§
g

<4-l
•H






o
CO
co
' m
%





vO
m
CM
»*
r-l









%
g

4-1
•H






r-l
i-H
<^
m






is \t
•> CO
C r^
O r-l
4J CU
CO &
oo m
CO i-H
00 CM
vO i— 1
CM

O 0

m  »>S ^S
C C C
o o o
4-1 4J 4J
co co co
•vf C^ fv.
 r*** ^^
CM i-H r-J







CO vO vO
CO CM CO




r-l O O
vt CM r>.
r-l 
-------
           FiGJRt 23
         STONEY  CHEEK
PRINCIPAL SOURCE  LOCATION  MAP

-------
                      PRINCIPAL SOURCES

Site No.
     The 20 gpm effluent sampled at this site represents a dis-
charge from a swampy area Just north of Central City.  At this
point, a considerable amount of coal refuse material is scattered
about the general area.  This refuse has, in places, resulted in
the formation of several small impoundments within the swampy area.
Leaching of this refuse has resulted in the production of highly
mineralized water which seeps to Dark Shade Creek.  Sample No. 5211
represents a cumulative discharge of this drainage.  The acid load
from this single source was 2,880 Ib/day.  There were numerous im-
measurable seepage areas in this vicinity which contributes unknown
amounts of acid to the receiving streams.

Mine No.
     The 2,889 gpm effluent from this source was the largest mine
drainage discharge in the Shade Creek watershed.  The exact origin
of the drainage is unknown.  It may result from a shaft or borehole
or may drain one of the numerous large drift mines which have been
operative at one time in the Central City area.   The discharge is
located in a somewhat swampy area between the railroad tracks and
Dark Shade Creek at a point just below the confluence of Little Dark
Shade Creek and Shade Creek.  The concrete structure from which the
drainage emerges somewhat resembles a "pill box" approximately eight
feet in width and two feet in height.  Whatever the origin, the
                            307

-------
structure has quite obviously been constructed for the explicit




purpose of draining a nearby mine.  The acid load discharged to



Dark Shade Creek was 6,93^ Ib/day.






Mine Ho. 5293



     The drainage from this mine reportedly results from the



abandoned Franklin No. M- Mine in Central City.  The preparation



plant associated with this mine is still in operation.  Surface




mined coal from the surrounding area is trucked to the plant for



preparation prior to being loaded in rail cars.  The drainage flows



from a culvert near the preparation plant and discharges to Dark



Shade Creek directly behind the Central City Fire Station.   The



acid load was ^,515 Ib/day.






Mine No. 5327



     This mine is located approximately 0.3 mile northeast  of the



old Berwind White No. 37 Mine.  It is assumed that Mine No. 5327



is associated with the Berwind operation.  The discharge was 180



gpm which carried an acid load of 1,771 Ib/day to an unnamed trib-



utary of Paint Creek.  The main portals at Mine No. 37 were dry.






Mine No. 5333



     This mine is located on main stem Stony Creek about midway be-



tween the Johnstown suburbs of Moxham and Hornerstown.  There are



two mine openings at this site at a level just above the Johnstown



and Stony Creek railroad tracks which parallel this section of Stony



Creek.  One of these openings is dry while the second discharged
                             308

-------
an effluent of H80 gpm directly to Stony Creek.   The acid load from



Mine Ho. 5333 was 3,312 Ib/day.





Mine No. 5338



     The discharge at this mine site results from a shaft which was



reportedly constructed to drain mine workings from a nearby mine.



This 120 gpm discharge is located on the opposite bank of Stony



Creek directly across from the small community of Krings.  The mine



or mines drained by this opening are probably drift mines developed



in the coal seams outcropping along Stony Creek.  The acid load dis-



charged to main stem Stony Creek was 2,398 Ib/day.





Mine No. 5*H1



     Mine No. 5^11 is one of nine drift mines located along the



South Fork of Bens Creek just above the community of Thomas Mill.



Eight of these mines contribute drainage to the South Fork.  Mine



No. 5^11 is by far the largest of these effluents.  This mine is



almost totally responsible for the grossly discolored appearance



exhibited by the South Fork along its entire remaining downstream



length.  The acid load carried by this 1,256 gpm effluent was



2,231 Ib/day.





Mine No. 5*H5



     The largest acid load in the entire k66 square mile drainage



area of Stony Creek resulted from Mine No. 5^15.  This mine, as



well as two additional openings, are located on the west bank



hillside almost directly across from Point Bark in downtown Johns-




town.  All three openings have been sealed; however, about 75
                             309

-------
below one of the seals, a 630 gpm effluent discharged to Stony



Creek.  At the time of sampling, the acid load was 26,838 Ib/day.






Mine No. 5^27



     This mine is located near the headwaters of Wells Creek, a



tributary to Stony Creek.  There are tro openings to the mine



and both were discharging at the time of inspection.  The com-



bined effluent was 225 gpm which carried an acid load of 1,215 Ib/day.



The area immediately above the old openings has been surface mined.





Mine No.
     This 3Ul gpm effluent drains from the old Wilber Mine on the



east bank of Stony Creek south of Hoovers vi lie.  At the time of



inspection, this drainage was piped under Route 53 to the prepara-



tion facility of the Solar Fuel Company.  An unknown portion of



this drainage was lime treated by the Solar Fuel Company for use



in their facility.  The acid load carried by the entire untreated



discharge as it emerges from the hillside was l,2Mt- Ib/day.  A



second effluent of 8 gpm also discharges from the Wilber Mine.  A



salvage operator at the mine reported that the entire discharge from



the mine was at one time piped under Route 53 «  However, due to a



roof fall within the mine, a portion of the drainage is diverted




and is not piped under the road bed.  The acid load from this sec-



ond source (No. 5^65) was 69 Ib/day.



     Although not operating, the portals and air fan to this mine



were still in tact and a considerable amount of mine equipment
                            310

-------
was on the site.  Apparently, the mine had been vorked to some ex-



tent until recently.





Mine Ho. 5902



     Mine No. 5502 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek



just below the mouth of Shade Creek.  A series of three drift mines



are located along the hillside.  Two of these were dry while the



third (No. 5502) contributed a discharge of k20 gpm which carried



an acid load of 3,830 Ib/day.





Mine No.
     This underground mine is located at the tip of a one mile



contour surface mine.  The surface mine apparently removed the



coal outcropping along the hillside but did not cut into the



older underground entry.  However, the surface mine has probably



created points of intersection with the underground mine voids.



The discharge measured at the mine opening was 270 gpm which car-



ried an acid load of 1,037 Ib/day.
                             311

-------
                     REFERENCES
 1.   Vanzandt, H.  M.,  1933  Impounding Mine Water to Reduce Acuity
     in the Bituminous Coal Mines of Western Pennsylvania,  a  report
     to the Coal Mining Institute of America, Dec. 6-7,  1933.

 2.   Section 206,  Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965,
     authorized a comprehensive water resources  study of the
     Appalachian Region.

 3.   Schneider and others, 1965, Water Resources of the  Appalachian
     Region Pennsylvania to Alabama, U. S.  Geological Survey  HA-198.

 k.   Shapiro, M. A., Andelman, J. B., and Morgan, P. V., 1966,
     Intensive Study of the Water at Critical Points on  the Mononga-
     hela, Allegheny,  and Ohio Rivers in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
     Area, University of Pittsburgh, 126 p.

 5.   The Clean Streams Law, PL 19^7, Pennsylvania Legislative Act
     39*4-, June 22, 1937, as amended.

 6.   Abatement of Pollution from Abandoned  Mines in Pennsylvania, A
     Progress Report,  Sanitary Water Board, Publication  No. 26,
     March 1, 1970.

 7.   Pennsylvania Department of Mines and Mineral Industries  -
     Bituminous Division, Annual Report 1968, 219 p.

 8.   Dowd, J. J., and others, 1951> Estimate of  Known_Recoverable
     Reserves of Coking Coal in Armstrong Coun1% Pa. ,~U. S. Department
     of the Interior Bureau of Mines, Report of  Investigations  U80l,
     16 p.

 9.   Dowd, J. J., and others, 1950, Estimate of  Known Recoverable
     Reserves of Coking Coal in Cambria County,  Pa., U.  S.  Department
     of the Interior Bureau of Mines, Report of  Investigations  ^73*4-,  25 p.

10.   Dowd, J. J., and others, 1950, Estimate of  Known Recoverable
     Reserves of Coking Coal in Indiana County,  Pa.t U.  S.  Department
     of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of  Investigations  V757,
     22 p.

11.   Wallace, J. J., and others, 1953, Estimate  of Known Recoverable
     Reserves of Coking Coal in Somerset County, Pa., U. S. Department
     of the Interior,  Bureau of Mines, Report of  Investigations  ^998,
     20 p.

12.   Dowd, J. J., and others, 1951> Estimate of  Known Recoverable
     Reserves of Coking Coal in Westloreland county, Ba., U. IT.
     Department or the Interior, Bureau of  Mines, Report of In-
     vestigations U803, 16 p.

-------
                REFERENCES (Continued)
13.  Shaffner, M. N., 1958, Geology and Mineral Resources of the
     New Florence Quadrangle, Pennsylvania^ Pennsylvania Geological
     Survey, A57, 155 p.
                             313

-------
APPENDICES
    315

-------









^J

X
S
[25
w
PM
CM












vO
VO
i— i
CO
60
C
•H
C
•H
M-H
^
CO
>

3
CO
1
^»
4J
•H

rt
cr
j_J
CO
4J
rt
S
B
rt
cu
rH





C
•_^
CO
rt
r-l
0)
>

C*
CO
rt
4J
co
C
•H
B
•H
CO
•H
W






CO
JJ en
O *W
T-I 0

CO
CO
0) *->
C T-I
cd ^-v
hft bl

l~
cd c ^~
.U O 61
o ,H B
H M >^

m
4J *•>
cd T-I
M-4 *^v
rH 61
3 B

CO
CO /•>
CO T-I
•9 61
^3

JJ
C »->
•H T-I
cd 61
T-I N-'
*S
•H 61
°N§

PS
O

CO
M-i a)
O rH
a
• s
o B
'Z, CO




B
o
•H
4J
rt
u

C
0
•H
cd •
JJ O
co 2;
 i— i





r-H r- 
CO C
t^ cfl
rt X!
O CO
^


o
ON
<)•
m o
rH rO
oo





0 CM
0 0

o o
O rH




0 0
<»• in
C<1



0 0
r-- O
VO



0 0
m m
TH
o o
CO O
1-H

CM OO
* •
VO 1^




r**»


C X



(0
rt rt
X! 



j CM r>-
ON O ON
m CM


O O ON
CO CO CM
rH CO CM
o o o
o m ON
CM

in <)•
• •
vo r*-




r-.


C X 60



-$-3
% §
o B

09 (-1
C rt
(U 0)
m e


m
ON
^-
0 0
CM CM
rH

CO CM
• *
VO PN.




f-s,


n ^


Jkuj
co
r-l ON
o m
CM

O CO
rH 4J
rH 3
Q) O


ON
ON
»J
CM
vO
CM





rH
O

CO
O

*
VO
^^
oo
vO
O
rH


0
CO
rH


co
r>.
CM
^
f^.












60



jf

CO
CO
o






in o r^
o o CM
rH <(• CM





o oo co
o o o

rH CM -3-
CO CM VO
I— I



O O CO
vO • CM
vO CM
CM CM
CO rH

tj
****
o m
O CM
o m
i*» m


O CO

i (&)
r-4 4J
vV Q) M-|
> ODTt






                                       A-l

-------
0)

c

u
c
o
CJ
H
/•"N
Oil
*+•
i-l CJ


CO
09
0) ^
C r-l
cd * —
60 6
Cv!
«("* ^^
I-l ^*v
U O 6
one
H H ^

cd i-i
3J
CO >-•

09
09 /->
0) i-l
c **•-*.
£~
•H
C /•>
•rl i-l
SI
^^
4J ^^
"o ^
*

09
in a)
0 r-l
o
• e
O cd
13 CO




g
•H
4J
cd
o
3
o
Q
u
cd •
4J O
co S3
O O CO
in ON m
CM r-l




ON vo co
i-l CM CM

>
CO CM

o o m
O CM O
O O 00
IO r-l CM
vo rx i-i
• •
co m




vO


C X 60

(^
m «
60 V
0) C
T"H
O CO 4-1
cd 0) 3
« CJ I



ON
vD
m
O O CO
O vO vO
VD ON CO
CM i-l



r-l CM 00
st oo m

*
m
m ON CM
vo t-» in
r-l C^) CM




O CM r-l
O O CD

O vO CO
O r-4 O


^J
%_ 
Cd 4J O
C 3 43
C Q «d fc
of pj «
43 • 0) i-l
r-l CO 60 C
cd • TJ O
>sp T-l 60
Q p -H
h3 vB» « rJ



CM
(«s.
m
O O CM
co o m
m co CM
CO r-4



CM m o
co m «*

o •* oo
00 00 CO
.



00 00 r-l
oo CM m
CM r-l
co in oo
«* CM r»
r-4

^?
v— '
O O CO
o m vo
«tt i»» m
•it -it »*



o o m
 1
2 2
•H
43 cd
60 r-l
3 m

CO O r-l
C r-l r-l
O CO -H
CJ 43 >



in

m
o o oo
vo m 05
m o r»-
r-l



m m vo
co vo -*

O O CM
r-l CM m
ON r-l r-l
CO CM


O O 00
o o m
m o »*
•ct in oo
I-l CM r-l


O O CM
r^ O r-i
•* r-4 r-l
CM -vf CO

O O O
O O O
O O 00
 Jj
0 43
*~~* *2
o p
cd cd
r-l CO
« C



VO

in
o m sj
r-i r» in
CM sd" CO




ON O CM
CM r^ in

CM -* r-l
CO *Ct f^s
vo r~s in
r-l CO CM
m
s^
O O 0
0 O O
m o CM
«H in hs.
r-l CM r-4
in
S^x
O O 0
O CM CM
r-l CO CM

O O O
O O O
o o in
i-l CM O
r-4 l*v r-l
|^^ i^ C3
r-l r-1
|ss ON
CM CM




vO


C X 60
A! CM
CO CM

C 4J
cd ^ 3
MOO
m i-i p2
r-4 •
43 ^ CO
4J O •
l-i cd p
O r-i
z pa (Si



pv.
f>^
m
                                              A-2

-------
5 co
Ot.i__t
M-f
r-l 0
fr. S^

CU
CO
S'S

C° 6
3W
/^->
2 O ^
O Jj 6
H H v^
CU
4J /"N
CT) r-l
r-l 61
3 £3
co ^
DO
CO

"US
5-
•H
c /-•>
•rl r-l
n) U
•rl r-l
"0*8
<^
PS
O

CO
'•M O
O i-l
* €
O rt


C
O
•rl
4J
cfl
0
3
C
0
•H
4J
rt •
4J 0
CO !3
O O r-l
00 CM 00
•d" CM




vO ON CD
CM m -d-
x— \
•**s
^
(q g)
O M


•rl
t 1 Jj
O
O r-l
^



oo

m
o o co
ON CM fo
CM r-l l-v
CM m co

s~^
in
O r- oo
CM r-l ON
CM * CM
vO CM

x-N
m
s^
O O O
O O O
O -^ 00

oo co ON
r-l

o o m
O CM r-l
CM O 1-^
O O O
o m  0>
Ctf 4J >
X Q -H -H
u tJ ei
C M
cd 0 0 43
14 g 4J 60
Bfl r-4 3
•rl • 0)


Vj U J-i C
O O 4J O



0
oo
m
O ON
1 • •
0 0
oo  3 CO
•rl 'H r-l
tJ M M-l l3



r-l
00
m
i-l _> ON
O CM CO
I—I




O CO r-l
O CM r-l

o m CM
o o o


/•x
m
^^
o o 
vo r-i -d1
CM T-4


o o oo
uji o m
ON O vt
CM r-l

O O CO
CM 00 O
CO CM
o o o
o co r^
•tf r-l

1-1 ON
• •
m vo


VO

C X 60
•H Ctf ft
CJ
CO
rl
Cfr^
•H U
C 3
o o
f-^ C
frj
6 r-l
CO n)
3 0)
cy c



CO
00
m
m o oo
«* O CO
i-l CO CM




CM I"- m
o o o

o m CM
o o o


m
^^
O O 00
m m co
m co o\
I-l CM r-l


000
r^ r^» CD
00 CO rH
rH CM CM

O 0 r^
CM 00 ON
r-l CM r-l
o o m
m vo i— i

vo o
• •
vo r*^


vO

B X 60
O
*2
CO >s
to O
CJ 4J
CO

C rl
O cfl
•U CU
CO C



m
00
in
                                              (U
                                              09

                                              3


                                              00

                                              CU
                                               rl

                                               0)
                                               m
                                               0)
                                               AJ
                                               erj
                                               U
                                              •rl


                                              •g
A-3

-------
                              APPENDIX B




          KISKtMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES




           CODES FOR TABULAR DATA - PAGES  B-l  THROUGH  B-5
        TYPE




C - Combination Mine




D - Drift Mine




S - Strip Mine




R - Refuse Pile




0 - Oil Well




A - Active Operations
           RECEIVING STREAM




 1 - Wo1ford Run




 2.  Unnamed tribs to Wolford  Run




 3.  Kiskiminetas River




 4.  Unnamed tribs to Kiskiminetas River




 5.  Beaver Run




 6.  Unnamed tribs to Beaver Run




 7.  Unnamed tribs to Porters Run




 8.  Thorn Run




 9.  Unnamed tribs to Thorn Run




10.  Unnamed tribs to Long  Run




11.  Pine Run




12.  Rattling Run




13.  Sulphur Run




14.  Sugar Hollow




15.  Roaring Run




16.  Guffy Run




17.  Blacklegs Creek




18.  Unnamed tribs to Blacklegs Creek




19.  Big Run




20.  Unnamed tribs to Big Run




21.  Whiskey Run




22.  Unnamed tribs to Whiskey Run
                               B

-------
                                                                                                                                    B-l
                     m    r-t   o
                                                            cn   m    NO   en
                                                                                  ON    rH
                                                                                  en    o
                                                                 3    In
                                                                                                        o   CM    in
                                                                                                        fx   rH    CM
                                                                                                        00   00    rH
                                                                                                                              sO
                                                                                                                              CO
           in    rH
           O    CM
                                                                                        O    t--    r*    m    O
                                                                                        O    O    rH    rH       •*
                                                                                                   oo   o
> so
rH

O
sO

O O
ON »*
O O
rH >*
O
o
m
o
s
CNj
O
00


                                                                                                        3
                      o
35
2.
m    CM    o
so    so    m
r-*    r-.    so
rH    rH    CM
                                                                                        O
                                                                                        S
           §o
           en
 L C
 '8
1 §
i in
4 cn
3 ON
O
O
**
CM
m
§ 8
m o
cn -*
cn cn
o
o
s
so
8
m
cn

-------
B-2
1
i-
t-t rH
<^

fl)
4) ^
01 rQ
« rH
C
JfrH
§cd
•3
IH "x,
M &
rH
rt
4J
o-f
^3

n
0) -O
4J *X,
rt Xi
VH rH
3
"i

n
W "O
0) "^
S3
•§
li^


q
51 -5
•H -^
Tj r-l
e
E


g
£
I
u B
•ri n
•H I
m\
PS
O,
r?
•H S
> I
•H (
a h
U 1J
d) CO
pS
«
U O
3 !
41
1*
r*
O
rH
00
CM

rH
O



in

o
00
in

O
rH


S
*f

.n



rH
CM

00



lA
CM
CO



CM



lA
sD
CO


sO



CU

sO
m
«o
lA
0>
O
rH
rH
fO
o



CO

rH
O
in
so
CO

rx
rH


O
3

so
CM



O
m

ON



O
CM


^



o
§
CO
sD



CO



Q
iA
O
S
00
rH
rH
CO

CO
o



ON
rH
CO
o
rx
rH

CO


lA
CO

O
rH



O


CO
ro


8
so
rH


CM



|
CO
CM


ON



cn
VO
lA
sO
CM
VO
CO

CO
CM



r.
ON
rH
CM
O
0
CM

O
CM
CM


O
CO
lA

CM
rx



8
in


rH


O
iA
rH


«M
rH


O
o
o
CO


ON



cn
^
o
m
00
CM
.A
rH

CM
00



_
CM
CM
CO
CM
rH
m
rH

O
§
CM

O
CO

o>
o



1



§


in
o



IA
CM
rH


0
lA
CM
CO
CO


rH
rH


o
00
m
^
rH
_
r-«

-0
o



^

rH
rH
rH
ON
CM

O
CM


m
CO

§



o
CM
-a-

00



o



CM



O
S




rH
rH


O
0
O
^
CM
rH

m
o



rH
O
rH
CM
n
5

§


O
ON
ON

O
CO



CM
CO
sO


CM


8
iA



^



8
lA
CM
CO


o
r-t


O
CO
S
_
o
*
rH
rH

0
o



CO
CO
O
tn
00

rH
rH


in
CM
ON

m



m


m



o
rH
-a-



rH



8
CM
CM



O
rH


Q
-tf
S
O
rH
ON
sO
CM

rH
O



so
CO
o
lA
ON

CO
CO


o
CO
ON

t
f
1
I

1
1

'
CO
CM


O
in



CO



8
sO
CM
CO


sH;



o
m
s
CO
lA
O
CO
rH

CO
lA



rH
CO
rH
ON
rH
5

CM
CO
m


lA

8
lA


lA
CM
CM
fH
ON
CM


in
CO
so




CO


1
CO
CO


CM
fH


U
r-
CO
lA
SO
O
so
§

CM
O



CM
rH
rH
O
S

fH


o
o

rx



o
sO

CO



in
rH
rH


rt



|
CO
CO


CO
rH


0
00
S
cn
CO
o
VO
-t

^
rH



lA
r-
rH
O
CO
0*

CO
o
CM


lA
iA
rH

lA



so
CO

r-.
CO
rH


o
S
rH


lA
rH


O
o
CM
CO


CO
rH


Q
ON
S
*H
^
CO
ON

CM
CM



O
in
rH
o
r-l
CO
t»-

00
rH


lA
ON
CM

ON
CO



o
rx
CM

CO
m


m
o\
o
rH


CM



§
CO
o
CO


CO
tH


Q
0
»
r*.
»n
ON
00
m

r-
rH



r^
rH
sO
CO
sO

CO
rH


8

SO
CO



sO
r-.
ro

lA
fH


0
rH
lA
rH


00



O
8

CO


fO
rH


Q
rH
S
vO
vO
OV
lA

^
O



o
CO
CO
CM
SO

rH
CO
rH


O
SO
CM

CO
CO



sO
CM


sO


O
rH
rH


CM



8
O
CO
CM
CO


CO



Q
CM
00
^
S
O
lA
sO
CO
_
,_,



rH
ON
sO
§
O
sO
00
o\

sO
sO
in

1

CM



00


CM
h-


8
in


o
00


o
00
00
(M


CO



Q
CO
00
1C
CO
CM
CM
O
3
Ov
rH
CO
rH


O
in
O
o
00
in
CO
o
vO
vO


8
lA
CM
m
rH



CO
CM
so


IA
IA


8

fO
CM
CM



O
§
o"
rH
rH
CM


CO



C4
^
S
VO
O
o
CM

O
O



O
CM
O
rH

O
rH


8

CO



lA
rH

0
rH


8



CM



O
S
rH
CM
CO


CO



Q
lA
00
00
ON
CO
0
3
"""
rH
rH



lA
§
CO
lA
CM
CM
3

sO
ON


O
8

OO
IX.



o
sO

VO
00
I-I


o
o
CO
CTV


^



§
CO
CM



-------
                                                                                                                                                             B-3




























83
a

s
i

o
i
A
CO
2
j*
s
i
S

CO
2
a
i*
§ ^
C r-4
1
3
4g rH
"i
>
Q) -fl
09 --x
S.O
rH
00
(J rH
""
>

& -v.
M .O
rH
rH
2
0 rH
H ^
1


H
*
n f.

3
1


>!
n
DB -v.

T3 ""*
If
>,
>.-3
4J *"s.
•H J3
-O rH
•H
a
£


g

<,
CM

O
§
m
O



rH
ON

m
O
rH


CM
m
rH


ON
CO




in
3


CM



O

CO
r*.


8
cn
rH


m

_
3

O
00
vO
O
in



ON
CO
vO

r**
CO
vO
CM

O
CM
cn

cn

CM
rH
CM


O
m

ON
CM
O
vD
cn


m

i-*
m
r-
^
o
3



CM
r*.
VO

8



o

i-i
o

00
r^
o
0



r-
o

o
o




o



CO




o
CM


CM



NO
NO
T-4

CM


CO
rH



r-t

00
CM
in

0
H
.-H
Ox
00
cn


rH
00

ON
cn
cn
rH


r*.
CM



S
rH
r-.


g
<*
rH

$
cn
cn

°

O
NO
cn
cn
8



o

r-t
0

00
"*
r-l
O



NO
"*

r^
O




00
in



00




in
CM
NO


*



8
cn

in


o
m
.
§
CM
ON
rH
vO
VO
O
CM


cn
m

cn
CM

CM


CM



CM
CM

C-J


O
O


vO
cn
CM
CM

m

o
m
r-*
rH
S



•it
CM
CO

CO
»

r.
NO
CO
^
CM
cn


o
*

vO
vO
rH



rH



00
rH
m


3
vO



CM

O
O



m
o



o




o
o
-d-


o



o
CO

o


CM



o

o
o

o
r-l
o
o



r-
o

o
0



m
o


o
o




m
in
CM


O



o
CM

o


m



o

O
0

^
0
o
o



o
o

o
o



CM
o



o




a
CM


o



o
r-l
CO

0


NO
rH
1



o

CM
•*

m
CO
CM
rH
,_(



CO
NO

o
o



CM
O



00




0


s



cn

cn


m
rH
CM



rH

CD
o

o
rH
r-
r-4
O




-------
B-4























CO
u
&
1
£
o
z
§
H
CO

•j!
|
a
a
i
CO
£











»••
•a
5s
§
^
S
S^o
O rH
C
rt
00
J •"*
*
s 1
o ~
H .C
rH
(0
O rH
H"§
0,1
4J ""v
td ,0
4H rH
i-l
3
CO rH
"i

m t
^


^,
n
X t

•H ^
3C

§
£

a>
c
u c
•H C
u :
8-1
CO (
CJ
32

W>
C
•H !
0) •
U •
0)
CO
3-

r*.
o-«
O
r^
CM
O




stf
CM
t-H
r-.
O


CM
rH
CO
CM



O
8
rH

O
\o
CO



o
CM


CO
CO

CM




8
CM


O
CO


CM
CJ

CO
CM

O
0
r-t
tM
rH
O




CO
CO
o
o


o
0
CO



in
r-


vO
r-



1-4


rH
VO

i— i




O
o
CM


CM
vO


CM
CO

CM

u-i
*~*
*
$
^
O




rH
CO
f-
r_,


CM
s
m
CO



s

CO
rH
o
CJ*



CM
CM


O
CM

CO




O
8


m
CO


CM

m
3

m

CO

g
m

o
vO



8
in


CO
CO


CM
Q

rH
CO

ON
*"*
O
r-l
r-t
CO
o




CO
CO
CO
CO
o



CM
CO
CO
CM



8


0
in
CO



r-
t-H


o

i-t




8
O


rH
CO


CM
O

CM
CO

r-
o
CM
CM
CO
0
rH




CO
CM
CO
O


O>
rH
rH
CO



8
CO

i-H
CO



rH


m
CM

CM




8


m
CO


CM
CO

CO
CO



r-l




0
g
CM


-------
                                                                                                                                                                                     B-5
s
a
I



S



S
S
             I
             s?
             •H  E
             >  «
             5
             CO
                       O    O    O     O     r-»     O     CM

                       O    O    O     O     «-i     O     v£>
                       O    O    in     ^.t1     O     fO     ro

                       fj    O    O     •*     co     f-J     (^
                       o    o     o     o

                       o    o     o     o
                                                         O     r-l

                                                         o          !>•
                       o    o    o     o
                                                         O     o
                                                         ^     3
                       o     o    o    o
                       us    oo    co    o     o     o     n
                       CM    \&    CO    VO     OO     •"•*     O>
                                           ^.     es     f**     CM
                       o     o    o    o
                                                         O     00
                                                                t—t
                                                                t£>
                              s
                       o     o    o    o     oo     o     o
                              O    O    O    O    Q
                       O     O    CM    O    O    O
                       O     f1"*    *•*    00    *fl    "
                                    **    n    P*I     ro     
-------
                                 APPENDIX C



                              LOYALHANNA CREEK




               CODES FOR TABULAR DATA -  PAGES 0-1 THROUGH C-2
          TYPE




C - Combination Mines




D - Drift Mine




S - Strip Mine




R - Refuse Piles




Sh - Shaft or Slope Mine




CO - Coal Outcrdp
          RECEIVING STREAM




 1.  Loyalhanna Creek




 2.  Unnamed tribs to Loyalhanna Cr,




 3.  Getty Run




 4.  Unnamed tribs to Getty Run




 5.  Crabtree Creek




 6.  Little Crabtree Creek




 7.  Keystone Run




 8.  Union Run




 9.  Saxman Run




10.  Ninendle Run




11.  Miller Run




12.  Fourmile Run




13.  Clark Hollow




14.  Unnamed tribs to Mill Creek




15.  Hannas Run




16.  Unnamed tribs to Hannas Run




17.  Whitethorn Creek

-------
i
T
§5
L
"* 8
a
mgane«e
2-.
1
g 1
O T
r_,
(U
O -4
H~8~

3
(O «-4
a

«
01 T
C r-l
l~
8
a
>ST

•0 -
1
8
Bu

I
u c
•H •
U4 4.
CO (
u
•&

H !
« b
U 4
U 4

CO
So
s*
01 CO

CO 00
g s
r-l O
0 0
m r*>
CO CM
IA rH
-4


O O>
OS *
IA
r*» r-l

80
ICO
CM IA
ro


§00
en

r*. o
h- r-i


O O
S 3
CO
(SI Csl




1 1


tA 00
CM ro

r-4 r-l

u a

IA o
CM »A

r. « ,n -
O 00 1- -»
O4 !"• m OS
lA rH
co vO r- A
00 CM -I
~ - o tn




r-l r- I


cn to o ao
^ «•* en CM



Q O fi ^


tA 00


O O O O O
CM O ro PO >*
CO iA O
r- * r-4
CO lA CM CM 00

80 Q O lA
O Mf -1 CM
r-l r-4 r-l
r-4 CO r- •*
CM r-l

•* •» CM CM •>*
O •* r*. IA CM

" S 5 S S
3 lA r-l

lA IA in lA IA
r-l (-4
sO *» CM




8Q Q Q Q
o o o o
 -«r m SA r^
fH r-4 r-l rH rH
in in in in in


CO «
r-l SO
r-4
— O
•» 171
CO O
(M rH

"-1
OS
*
O
GO
O
00
0


o
CM

lA

O
I-*
r-4
tA
i-4

O
CM

cn


IA
CM
o
CO




§
IN


m
CO



a

m
^
o
IA
0
CO
SO
SO
rH
rH
CO
o
sO


0
s
CM
r-4

O
CO
r-l
3

S

CO


r-4
R




S
04
1*1


^
CM



O

m
m
CO
-•
SO
r*
0
O
fs4
CM
IA


O
CO
rH
(M


0
CM
CO
rH
-

R

lA
CO


0
5
CM




8
S


^
04



U

IA
CO
"
>0
3
0
O
*-4
^
SO


O
lA

tA
rH

g
CM
~
CM

00
r4

CO
CM
r-4

IA
S
r-4
0
(-4




8
00
*+


00
CM



to

•A
r-4
m

o
CM
O
s
IA
r-4
&
*


CM
lA

lA

CM

O
CM
r-l

O
S

r-4
**

1
Csl




m


CO
CM



a

so
rH
*A
fM
O
<*>
CO
rH
O

o
I
CM

O
8

O
I-*
IT.
rM

*

CM
R
o"
£

O
CO
ro
CM
tA
lA
C*
CM
CM


S


NO
^


sO
-*

CM
CM

0
sO

O

5

ro
O
F- 1

00
o
ro




1


.n
*



o

sO
•o
CM
tA

-------
                                                                                                                                        c-z
                                                                   -    •    s
           »OBinOO'*N'*»>l-*

           C>m    —    N>-ie>-iNmgo
in    o    N

28"
                                 K    in

                                 N    O
                                                                                                           »               —          -*    f*j   eg  *vj
                                                                                                          i-l                                       00
                                                                                                          IH


                                                                                                          O   O    r-    O    O    O    OOO-<   ««          IA    •«    IA    m  N     «
           <*i    *s    F-    in
                                                                                         -    N   S    S
                                                                                                                      ~«    tn    ro  ^  O
                                                                                                                      -^    O    O  Ps(  *
                                                                                                                      (••j    in    n  o  »*»
(4

5-
n    «    in
                                                                              m    r»    wt    o
                                                                              8    "    f    2
                                                                                               fM
                                                                                               r*
                                                                                               in
r^    o    r^    in
-»    O    o    m
N    —    »    oo
N  o
n  ga
•»  H
                                                                                               S    8
                                                                                                                «   (M    N    O    O
                                                                                                                                     ej  O  (M

                                                                                                                                     "*  S  *
                                                                               1    I    §
                                                                                                                                            m  o  O  O
                                                                                                                                                SO  O  O
                                                                                                                                                r*  r**  —«
                                                                                               vOtniANfii4CMiNegr>i*«if-'r*.
|3




 !J

-------
                                APPENDIX D



            CCHEMAUGH RIVER, WAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
            Codes for Tabular Data -
     Pages  D-l Throuefr  D-2
        TYPE



C.  Combination Mine



D.  Drift Mines



S.  Strip Mines



R.  Refuse Piles



Sh.  Shaft Mine



A.  Active
            RECEIVING STREAM



 1.  Conemaugh River



 2.  Unnamed trlbs to Conemaugh River



 3.  Aultmana Run



 k.  Unnamed tribs to Altmans Run



 5.  Reeds Run



 6.  Unnamed trlbs to Reeds  Run.



 7.  Weal Run



 8.  Coal Run



 9.  McGee Run



10, . Freeman Run



11.  Tubmill Creek



12.  Unnamed tribs to Hypocrite Creek



13.  St. Clair Run



Ik.  East Branch Richards Run



15.  West Branch Richards Run



16.  Hinckston Run

-------
                                                                                                                        D-l
a;
g
Q
ffi
g
>•
•3
a "^
9 A
c •-<
•H
rH
< rH



>
(1
T
ai -^
a £
c
&0

S ~*>
g
>
c i
85
:-
L

H"«

J3
o -a
u ^~
a jz
MH rH
rH
S
W rH
^,
g


.1
01^
S5
•0
IH
a rH
as ^-
>
n
rS-S
w >^
•n JD
T) rH
o
 I
« t
u w
co w
IX
0)
0 4
« •
53

d
o

m
o



v£>
rH



00
rH


r.
rH


O
CM

CM
r*



O
CO


CO




o
R

rH
O
rH
1


£
r-t
1
CM
I--



rH
m
vO


rH



Q
i
m

o
o

CM
o



o
o



r-
o


f>
o


r*.
^

rH




m
rH
CO


m




m

rH
1



FH
CO
1






o
8
rH







Q
ft
CO
m

-d-
m
"°
SO
o



rH
in



r-.
,3.


O
CM
CO

0
§
*
CM
m
00
rH


m
rH

00
CO




vO
§

R
rH



O
ON
CO
rH
O
ON



CM
O







0
CM
CO
m

rH

-------
D-2



































<*
W
>
s
1
^*


2
O
CJ
























•>.
rt
1 i
C rH
a
r-H rH
21
B


C n]

M X>
rH
n)
O r-4
M


ulfate
1 lb/d£
en -^
i

«
CO -O
CO \
111 XI
C rH
T)
ffl rH
X ~~.




Ct


U X


•H

"'s


g
C
a
o c
•H 0
O ~
8.1
CO 0
o
*s
I
> G
•H C
<0 <
U (-1
£ t
(X en
o
o i
CO H
B
2 z
CM
r~


r.
iA
Ov

CO
O



r-
,



at

3
in
rH
m


vO
O
CM
rH
CO
ON
rH


CO
m
(0
ON
vO
vO
vO

O
m
en
CM
rH
CO
CM
O
m
CO

0
s




o
CO




s
o





o
IA
00
CO


IA
"*


o
8
vO



CM
CO

in



01

3
in
m

CM




8
vO



CO






[^
1


^



8
o
CM



O


CO



3

§
CM
m

-------
     Codes for Tabular Data
  APPENDIX E

BLACKLICK CREEK

   Pages  E-l     Through   E-6
     Type

C - Combination Mines

D - Drift Mines

S - Strip Mines

Sh- -Shaft Mines

R - Refuse Piles

A - Active
               Receiving Stream

       1 - Blacklick Creek

       2 - Unnamed tribs to Blacklick Creek

       3 - Unnamed tribs to Muddy Run

       4 - Weir's Run

       5 - Laurel Run

       6 - Unnamed tribs to Laurel Run

       7 - Ramsey Run

       8 - Unnamed tribs to Ramsey Run

       9 - Mardis Run

      10 - Aulds Run

      11 - Unnamed tribs to Aulds Run

      12 - Unnamed tribs to Rummel Run

      13 - South Branch Blacklick Creek

      14 - Unnamed tribs to South Branch
           Blacklick Creek

      15 - Brush Creek

      16 - Coal Pit Run

      17 - Crooked Run

      18 - Dutch Run

      19 - Unnamed tribs to Hill Creek

      20 - Elk Creek
                                   E

-------
E-l







































£
CJ
g
J


a
CO
























X
^

3 -O
•H
JL
M)
e
X
T)
QJ ^
m X)
C
cd
00
C

ff
^
C T3
o -^
M <-*
m
u >~-<
H 00
E

X

TJ
ea >-<
3 i-i
00
E
X
rt
T!
w ^-,
eu .-i
C
•o
*^



n)

•H -C)
•O i-.
*^
00
E
8

Oi
u u
•H C
m nj
•H 0
r*»
rH

m
00

^
CM





it




i-i


o
in

"*
en




§



CM







Ctf
3
**
lA




O
lA
CO
O
rH






iA
ro
00
^J-
**

o
lA
rH
sO
CM
00
rH

O
o

'""
en
CM





O


iA

r-4


in
CM
o

CM




o
8


f-
CM

CO





*
3
^t
00
o



o
Ov
ON
eN
CO
en






lA
CM
^
vO
1— t

o
lA

~*
CM
ON
CM

O
O
rH
00
x.






1


a^

eN


0
m

•£>



8




o
v£>


O
m







*
CO
.
CO

§
lA

ON






O
ro



O
a>


o
sO
lA

lA
CO




1



CO

rH





ft
m
Vf
-*
tn

vO

CN
m

o
o
t£





ON
•*
-3-
,-(
2

rH
^J

rH
^
CM

evi

4
^|






ON
rH
ON
^J
iA

ro
NO
r-

CM
rH
NO

O
lA
00

-0
00





o
CM


CO

**


O
CO
lA

$




1



ro

CM





a
3

-------
E-2































g
o
a
M
d
u

03

















>,
5
C £
L
* >

X

>
c *o
O -x.

•H r-«
nj

«S>
n)
•O

rt <-l
U-t
a •-<
op
e
>,




<->CN'000'-<*0
0
f— ti— t^ocnsorxfM
O o rH o - O O OO Cn cM
rH fM CM CM 00 CM in

rx-J-cOiAONONCMrH
en



O n so in cn in CM in
CM CM P*J rH cn 00 rH




§O O O O O Q O
in in ON o o o in
fi-t
-------
E-3
































«
gj
u
M
5
CQ






















§
5
c
1



to

c
00
c

JC


(4
(H
c«
4J
H





4J
n)
CO



CO
c
TJ
PC


X
£

u





(J
•r-t
•H
u
g.
CO



•H
•H
(U
1
U

0
CO

r
c
2
fs
5
43
i_4
^

x
•o

,O


i-t
M)

x
TJ
rH
,-i
ff


m


JD
bp
6


ca
"O

\
fiP
B

cd
•o
^

rH
M
B


g
rH

(-1

ON


vO
ft




P^
CM

en
CO

00
2


8



§



0^

in
rH


CM


O



O
m



S
r-5


ON
en




CO
cn
3
CT*
lA

^
CM

m
0




i-t
CM

O
CM

en
CO


CM
ON



o



CM

rH
r-t


rH


O
o



O
CM



0
O
vO
r-t


O
*




CJ
^
3
en
O

m


o
O




CM
O

00
O

vO
en


cr



O



3

vO


en


ON
rH



CO
rH



O
CM
en


cn





O
in
3
o
o

o


o
0




rH
o

CM
o

en
^


CM



O
CO





m





0
CM



CM



O
CM
en


vO
*
CO



0
*
3
-i
0

-*


o
o




<"•>
_,


•*




^
rH




r^
,-J

VO
iH

•*
U-l


0
CO



m
CM



vO

CM


rH


CM



m
CM



g
m


m
„




CO
CM
1
-d-
CNJ




O
»-t




»d;
rH

0
rH

,»
r-t


O
t-4


m
rH



ON

CM
1-4


en


CM
-d-



S



0
m



in




CO
cn
CO
3
00
CM




^
,_,




ON
rH

^
O

^
o


ON



O
1-4



00

ON


m


'•O
m



m



o
o
en


m
*




CO
^
I
CO
o




o
o




CM
0

en
rH

^
m


en



O
en
i- <



CM

r-4


rH


5



o
CM



o
00


CO
m




CO
m
i
in
O




rH
O




r-l
O

,_,
o

CO
O


ON



O



"

CO


"T


CM
1



CM



O
O
CM


m
r--




O
NO
1
•1
o




o
0




1— 1
o

o
o

0
~


o



1-4





m





n
(SI



e*l



O
O
f-i


m
r^




O
^
3
ON
O




m
o




CM
CM

rH
O

•A
O


m



CM
CM



"*

ON
i- 1





en



o
CM



o



m
"




o
00
I
ON
r-l

0
cn

m
rH




i- 1
en

O
CM
en

O
m
CM

m
o-


§
ON



ON

1


cn


R



§



8
00


O
*




Q
ON
3
m
rH
rH
m
CM
o
rH
ON
^
en



00
PX,

^
o,
CVf
CO

o
oo
CO
fv

en
ON

o
O
CM
CM


o\
CO
i-H

ON
en


s
ON


m
m
o
CM


m
o



o
5


m
CM




a
o
3
rH
CO

m
ON

m
__,




cn
m

CM
ON
3

O
m
CM
m
rH
o
oo


8
CO
CM


O
CM

S


ON
-d-


0
p-



CM



8



CM
CM
o



CO
,_,
3
CO
CM

O
r-t
rH
n
o




CM
en

r-.
5

o
ON


ON



O
m
o
CM




p*.
rH


m


0
CO
CM
CM


CM



8
§


CM
CM




CO
CM
3
>~
§

m
CO
VO
m
en




o
ON
ITl
o
CM
en

O
8
CM
rs.
0
o


§
o



oo
CM

vO


O
Csj


O

0
CM
m



0
o
CO
ON


cn
CM
rH



CO
m
3
ON
r-.
f-H

m
CM
cn
ON
m




O
rH
00
CM
a

o
m
CM
o
CM
0
m



cn
ON


S

§
en


m


O
o
CO
r-


"*



g
tn


CM
CM
rH



ft

-------
                                                                                                                                                                               E-4
CO     CM     «O
                    ^     O
                    vO     CO
                                  o     vo     r-    ON     ro     CM
                                                r*»     rH
                                                in     o
                                                                                        O    O     CM
                                                             CO     CM     •-<
                                                             fM     O     t~*
O
o
•-H     i-H     CO    CO
o     o     o    -I
CO     CO     CO    CM
                                                                                                                   CO    lA     00
                                  iA     00     00
O     00     CO
O     f*     O
ON     CM
rH     O
CMvOOrHlAO"HCMCM     "-tO^OOOO
•-*iAOO«sJOOOr-ieMOOO'<*1OO
       O     i-4    ON     O
                                                      O
                                                      O
                                                                                  I-H    CO    rH     CO
                                                                                                                                 rHCO<-HCMONcMOlA
                                                                                                      OCMOOOr-HQOrH
                    r-t    lA     CM     CO     CM
                    ON    CO     CM     O     O
                                  i-H     CM     vO     O     «-H    O     CO
                                  o     o     o     o     o    o     o
                                                             f<    rH     0>pQp
                                          ****«*»*3'^i-*'
-------
E-5

























V.
S
o
8
rH
8
m















X
4
e S
1
tH rH
*>
^
si
v *
ST
s r-
>
^
g£
p .0

« r"
o ^-
H OP
B
rt
•O
U fl
rt i-1
r-t
S i-i
w ff

4
S .0
(4
g1


&l
|s
M
B
|
U U
T4 U
S.I
U C
3


• §
IB
* M
u
If
I;
vO
sO


»
vO
CO


0
-
CM
O


n
0

fH
CO

1
vO
tH
CM

8
CO


vO

3

S

o
CM
O\


IA
CO



CO
V0
tx tH rx *>4 (sj (r> ,H
O CO O ^ *O CO O
(A

m
O fx o* fO CM oo »n
f* CM CM fx in 00 O
O rx o O O O O


sf •* tH \O 00 s» CM
fO CM CO fx CO xt rH
"J1 CM ON o »n co »H
»n  (O in xf

3O xt tH O lA fx
CO CM xt CO CM rH

OJ O vO 00 CM *A CM

O o o o o o m
^ 3 IH IH 2 rH °*


lA CM iA «^ lA ^ CM
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM



O Q Q Q O Q O
PS oo CK o f^ CM cn
rH g rH g CM CM CM
in in uS in wS in in
CM
O


|H
°
O


CM
0
r-l
O


cn
o

cn


in
rH
m


CM



S

in

m
1-4

S
1-4


O
cn



0
i
o
o


o
o
o


1-4
o
o
o


rt
0

rH


in
1-4
^


m
so



rH

CM
CM

m

S



^
"*



O
§
CM
S


CM
SO
a


rH
CM
tO
S
CO

rH
.£

0
5

I
cn
S

o
""*


i

in
in

1

g
rH


m
CM



0
sO
CM
S
Ht
in


CM
CM
r^
0


o
m
^
-


^
r.

3


I
*
rH

fx



S

o

g

8

SO
rH
 in rs.
rH rH
tO SP rH in sf
CM St 00


o o m o m
* " S r( s?
•* VO CM CM O
tH tH

|H rH r-t fO |X
Sf IA A
fM
rH


O'
%c

vO


O
*
™


CM
tH
CM


S

tH
CM

2

o
rH
00


.,
cn



vt
r-t
r-
o

oo
in
r>
O


so
CH
O
o


rst
O

CM
<"H


O
00
rH
00


3



fx
CM

CM
CM

0

0
CM
IA



CO



CO
CM
3
fM
rH

O
CH

-------
E-6









































tf


c
8
*-J
g

ro















X
I-
S ^3
5 "
ft rH
ff


X
V •&
01 -^
S £
no
Ic
*I ^--
ff
^
C *3




flj

0 ^
H M


X
n)


0) — <
M-4
3 r-.



rt

U U
"** S
•H 4J
U U
0) 9
B.'O
(/) C
=§.
• 3
u C
a C
oK m
h
&&
8 o.
FM O O vo -*
rHOO^OQ
rM

rvj »n ^ *o O
(M O

fM
-« O O CM rH
T O O rH fM



.— a, •-< o *n
O ~J -* in rH
CM
' -» !> O rH O»
O O O •vO CO





O rH CO O
0 -• rH tf\ CO
ro

CM O O CM CM
rH



O vO o O Q
*
CM
CM
in O O rH CM
f*" CO W





00 00 vO O O
f"1- CO 00 CO O

CM


OO O O CO (O
rH VD ON
rH 0
CM

co in ON in O
CM O rH QO O

r-4
CM
O "• O O CO
QO CM


8 § | 8 8

CM
m vo oo in ov


V) V) V) 06 06
m uN m »n in
rH
m


Q
m
CO
m
o
rH



O
^
fM
rH






a»
ON


rj



O
in
CM

CO
rH
co





8
o
rH


rH
in
in


8

in
•""
PI


8
CM


in


at
R
8
CM
n



^


•3
O



m
o

00
rH





m
CM


8



O
r*.



CO





S




^
*!*


3



S


8
CM


rt


ft
00
8
ON
ON


r»
2


^
^



Ov
^

VO






r-l
CM


CO



O
rH
m



3
rH




8
CM



f^
CM
CM


3



s


§
rH

CO


a
ON
R
o
S


r.
fx


r^
O



ro
vO

fM
CO
l-l




rH
S
rH

OO
CM



8
CM


CO





O
CM



,_,
CO


m
CO



oo
rH



in
m



vo





S?
CM



00



fl



CM


§
rH

1-4
10

$
<
rH
00
in


o
S


CO
m



rH
CM

O
in
in
rH



»n
vD


vO
r-4
O
CM


1



CO
•*




o
VO




fx
S
r-4

m



O
CM

1
CM

m
CO

o
•<
CM
rH
O


•9



rH
C



in
vO

00
o





o
s


VO



•n



rH





g
rH



in



§



-H


§
rH

OO
CM
r*
O
•4
§
CM
CM


VO



O
O



.H
0

in
0





O
-


f^



in
vo



g
r-t




vO
•-I
CM



ps.
**


tM



3


§


O
»H

<
m
§

ro


0
,_,

ON


ro



CM
£


m
o

CM
CM
in
0
rH


a
®.
CM
rH


m
00
in



m
in
CM

m
CM
rH



0
rH
r-.

o
m
CO


GO
VO

•<
rH
m
rH


rH



rH
o



ro
0

m
o





CO
rH


S



in



o\





CO




o
rH
1


00
•v



o
CO


o
s


00
vO
VO

O
<
1
CO
00
CM


sr



^
CM



CM
0

CM
rH
CO




SO
CM


8



o



vO
00




p




VO

CO
CM
B
cM
rH


SO
O
vO




in
CM



O
CM
cO

CO
rH
in
m
m



0
~

§
04

O
CM

vt
<
oo
r-*
in
vO
CM


*n
rH


rH
o



r-
O

rsl
ro
CM
CM



in
2


CO
8

ON
*"*
0
CM
CO



CM
ON
CO
CO
«-*


o
CO
cr-



CD
p;
i

?



8
CM
rH

|


CM
00

<
3
rH
in
CO
s
in
"*
•-o
§


,H
vO
CO
rH

CM
^

^
CO
r-4
vO
CO


O
NO
vO
CM

S

o
vO
m
m
00
r-4


m
O
*
r-4



CM
tn
CO



0
(M
P-»

CO
§
rH


g
CM

§


vO


•<
m
rH
*t


*
00
GO
iTl

•S.
CM



CM
f*
cr
m
rj





m
CM
CM
•in

rH



8
CM
VO


in





00
O




rH
rH


O
VO
00
m


CM


§


r.
CO
o
CM
at
|

-------
                            APPENDIX F

                          Two Lick Creek
Codes For Tabular Data
       Pages F-l Through F-7
        Type

C - Combination Mines

D - Drift Mines

S - Strip Mines

Sh- Shaft Mines

R - Refuse Piles

0 - Gas  Wells.'


CO- Coal Outcrop


A - Active
         Receiving Stream

 1 - Two Lick Creek

 2 - Unnamed tribs to Two  Lick Creek

 3 - Yellow Creek

 4 - Unnamed tribs to Yellow Creek

 5 - North Branch Two Lick Creek

 6 - Unnamed tribs to North  Branch
     Two Lick Creek

 7 - Unnamed tribs to Little Yellow
     Creek

 8 - Buck Run

 9 - Unnamed tribs to Buck Run

10 - Ferrier Run

11 - Unnamed tribs to Ferrier  Run

12 - Dixon Run

13 - Unnamed tribs to Dixon  Run

14 - Leonard Run

15 - Unnamed tribs to Leonard Run

16 - Penn Run

17 - Unnamed tribs to Penn Run

18 - Ramsey Run

19 - Allen Run

20 - Tearing Run

21 - Unnamed tribs to Tearing Run

-------
                                                                                                                                                                 F-l






































M
1
g
3


r


















>•
•3
§ ^
•H
B
3
< r-l
"i

>

C rH
m
bO
C
%z
01
0
*x
c -3
25
M r-l
nj
4J
O H
*S
B
>
nj
•3
0) -^
AJ -O
5 "
3 f-"
CO --
g

>
rt
to tJ
S 5
C r-l
•o
b
BJ -v.
g

>
rt
X-d
*J *v.
•H JQ
TJ rH
•H
O
< r^
"a
s
0

fa
0)
o
o c
*iH (fl
O ^
 m
•H 0)
m «.

»n CM r». m o
Q txj -* 0 O


ON o m co •*
O O r-. CM O
r-l (M CM

m CM en o en
o o o o o



00 OO CM: rH 00
O O "A i~l r-l
r-l


in CM en CM CM
o 0




in
en



m
^j.
CM


00
00
O
CO
m


•-1


O

^

CM





o


en



8
in
vO

CM






O
§


o



-d-

*  O


en -4 en m en
cn en ON in -d

ew r^ O O m
r-t o o m o



en rH -j- ON \o
m O r-l rH ITl
rH


t^ CM in rH t—t
CTi CS O rH O
O ^ CM CM  m -d in m
1—4


O O O O O
eg ,-H rn _j

o m CM m  ON

O
CM


-d-
00

00
o



cn
m



en
O
rH
r-«

00
£>
CM



0
"

O
M





O
m


0



cn

en
O


CM
CO

r-*
O



CM
cn



CM
o
-a
m


<^j



m
P,


oo





0>
"*

00



U1
tvi

n






0
O
-*

^



oo

^
0


0
2

_
o



*?
in



0
o

"

rg






O


r^



00

O
O


r-l
CXJ

O
0



vO
,_(



0
o
u>
0

tvl




in
^-i


rg





r-^
"

o



\o









o
o


o-



en
OiQCJOOUMOOOOQO
                                                                                               MMUQOSQC/IOOWQ
OrHCMcn-di
inminminiANOiOND\o\ONOvD\OvOvOP^^r-'r^r^
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
in     NO    r*-     oo

CM     CM    CM     CM

-------
                                                                                                                                     7-2
>
rt
TJ
§i
c ~"
jj
«: -i
*
>
v -d
is
«j
60

1
>
C rt
h lv-
rH 41
n)
-U
O rH
f-H --
8
*>•
J3
ft) *0
u ""*-•
cd J3
m i-H
P
W rH
*s
>
m T3
W --.
OJ ,£1
C rH
T)
i->
ffl rH
as ---
&
E
>


3 £
*iH
^
g

h
0)
o
o c
tM 4.
•H y
o s
& c
w c
*

?
* 1

rH (M
O O
*""*

*
r-l
0 en
0 -H



r-, r*-
rH m

O 0
O m



ro oo
O m
r-H

CO O">
m
CM


O 0
CM r-.

en m
r->




CO ^
-H- 00
CM 



xT



CM
rH


O
fM
^
rH



O**
*^

fM
O



CO
o

00
rH
CO


O
m

CM
CO
fM



0
r-.

r-t
^
•*t



-*
i-l

CM
00




CM


in
00

v£)
•^1
i-H



s
•d-


CM
O
CM

s
lA
O
CO



I
CM

O\
CM



I-H
O


o
CM
0
O



o
rH

O
0



CO
O

in



lA
rH

\o




CM
vO
rH


O


O\
CO




§


CO
*°



O
O


vO
0
0
o



-*
o

r-l
O



CO
"*

r^



g

I-H


CM


in
vD
rH





^
o>

CO
CM



o
o


f-»
0
0
o



r-t
o

o
o



CM
O

m



m
eg

-*




S
CM


rH


OO
t





8


in
*



O
0


Os
0
0
o



o
CM

o
o



^
i-H

o



o


rH




CN
vO



O


m
P-I
rH




O
!-*


CO
m




o


f**
0
0
0



rH
O

rH
O



CO
o

o>
r»-



o
CM

-*
cr\




o\
•X)
CM


rH
rH


0
CO
1
O
CO



R


rH
r^




CM


O*>
°
CM
O



rH
0

m
o



CM
O

VO
lA


in
CM

vO
CO
m








CM
o
CM


vt
CO
1

0
IX
1
o

CM
CM
O



00
rH

O
O



CM
0

lA
•tf



lA
CO

|-»
CO




vO
0
CO


vO


-*
m
o




|


^
•*





-< - 0 
O CO rH CT\ O
CM r-4 lA CM


r*. CM CM CM >

-------
F-3
>
R
s^
§i
O -1
1
"i
>
a
0^
m A
1^
§
c S
2?
M X)
rH
rH
ttf
JJ
£^
%
B

>•
fl)
V *0
4J V.
« X>
UH r-l
"a
CO f-4
•*-.
s
>
Cl
to t

e "^
T)
Sd
i
>
Cl


•H ^
•^
bJ
6
g

b
0
o
0 C
•H rf
»*H AJ
•H o
0 3
1J
=g

oo
•§ s
> «
-H 0>
0) M
o u
3"
0)
O 0)
r4 P
8£
VI
S 0
s z


CM O
O O

0 r-*
i-t r-l
CM O
O O

O CM
00 O
r-i 0

P- O
r- O



,_,





o m
CO CO
CN)

CO O
CM



rH CM


CM O
1


o CM
rH rH

0 O
CM






O O
O\ vO
en r-4

in rH
vo rs


m m
rH rH





O CO

vO !*••«
CM eM
-* -3-


CM
0

o
"*
r-t
O

OS
O
O

en
0



CM





o
m

•si-
rH



CM
CO
CM

en



3

IA







in
c*g
r^

CM
•ct


-*
I-J





at

00

ON
ON

eM


rH
<*
«tf



rH
O
rH



O
CO
en

rH
Px


rM
CO
CM

CM



O
3

r-»
m
CM





O
m
m

CM
n


CO






O

s
*


m
rH


0
en
f»*
0

m

o

p^
in









s

00



o
rH

CM
CM


in
m


SO
CO
r-t CO

-

oo
cn


iA






Q

CM

o



r-





9

5



CM
en

CM



S

CM







0
rH
-Ct
cn


m






Q

m

-------
F-4
1
§2
C rH
«<
b|
B
>•
"9
V *v
CQ .0
n)
C
00
C
§
g 1
2|
2
fiC
H ^
y
e
i*
n)
cu *O

S«
3 _.
M c!
W
i
f*
rt
(0 T3
0) ^v
0) JD
C rH
T_)
t4
Cfl rH
K *--
(Si
e
p
rt
Ps-O
4J **~-
•H £>
TJ r*
T-l
I
8
fn
.



o^
o



O\
rH
^
O
0>
o


00
rH


O
en

cn
ON









CM
r*


rH
in
s




S

en
m




CD

00
00
<•*
vO
0

m
cn
rH

rH
O



CM
rH
„
O
00
£>
ON
*d-
m
ON

00
o


vO
O
rH


ON
O

^
vo
O



-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                           F-5
                            r->     fO     O

                            O     O     O
lA     tO     CM     ft     ON     *T

CO     «-<     CO     O     O     O
              CO     CO     CM     i-l     O    P'1'        i-t     O     M     CM     I-H

              1X00000        d     Q     o     •-*     o
                                                               CO     (O     o     ON
                                                                                                                in     IA     m    in
                                                                                                                                                                                 CM     o     ON     co  co o
                                                                                                                2     S
                                                                                                                                     *^-     rH     t—«    "d"        OOCM     ^H^HvO^^O
             0) .0
             0) rH
                            O'-H'-'ONONCOOO
                                                                                                                                     O    ro     O   -H
                                                                                                                                                                   CM     O     CM
                                                                                                                                        ^O     ON  O  ,


                                                                                                                                        O     CM  -*  T
                                                        O     U">     lA     00
                                                                                                                                            r-t    O    OO       CM     O     -tf
                                                                                                         (O     O     vO     O     O
                                                                                                                                                   o    o       ooo
                                                                                                                                                                                               O     lA  
                  q
              co  t
                                                                                                  NO        o     CM     r-.     co     O     oo
                                   OCOOOiAOONON
                            •-HOOOCO     r-iOtOiAiAOO
                            lA     O     CM
                                                                                    rH     CM     CO
                                                                -O  O  O
o

B
                            CO     CM     CM
                                                                                                                                                                                         CO     CO     -sf  -O  sD
                                                                                                                                                                                         CM            co  
                            lA     O     "A     lA     in
                            to     !*••     oo     f-i     r^-
                            CM     ON            O     00
                     lA     IA     O
                     lA     
-------
                                                                                                                                                                                         F-6
             «A    «O    •""


             O    O    03
                                  c«*     ON    cn    O
                                                                     co    co     co
                                                                      ro     CM     CM     r*.

                                                                      O     .O>r--COCMO


                                                               OO'-'CMCMOOOOO
                                                                             CO     O     CO

                                                                             o     o     o
             roOOiAf^.ro{>jt-4incor>\oror--iACMOO'O.0cO'3"O"'ir^.ocsJ      co
^"COiA            COCO'O^DONOOCMfMt—I^OP^            CM                   CM     CO     >—I      CM
                                                        rg     CM     O     CM     o     ""»
                                                               CM     CM     CM     CM     CM
                                                                                                                       S     S
                                                 O     O     O     O
                                                                                                  iA    CO     —
                                                                                                  CO    &     O
                                                                                                                        O     r-1     O     CM
                                                                      O     O     O
                                                                                                  vn    »n     o     >n     »n
                                                                                                                                             in     fM     co     CM
                                                                                                                                                                                O     co     o
                                                                                                                        o     o     o
                                                                                                                        IA     o     o
                                                                                                                        iA     CM     O
                                   O     CO    'A     CM
                                                                                                   fOtACMCMCMCMlACMlACMrslcM
^
                                                 CMCMCMCMfMCMCMCM
                                                                                                                                                                                CM     fM     CM
                                           Q     U     O    CO
                                                                             cocoviQcoodcococo
                                                                                                                                                                  Q      Q      O     Q     pj
              O     r-i    CM
                                                                      COONO^-*O^i--iCMCO»d'iAvDP^.COO*iO'~
-------
F-7





































^
u
o
g



g





















>
•3
1 la
C rH
•H
rH
8

cfl
01 ^v.
Vi -Q
0) rH
C
ffl
00
C
*?
si
IU -V.
M ,O
rH
2
O t-H
rH *v>
I

td
01 TJ
.u -"v.
td .Q
MH rH
rH
3
CO rH
a
5

n)
w TJ
M *-*

C «— *



K "a
B

>
rS-3
iJ "^
•H -D
•O rH
•H

"i



&.
OJ
u
U C
£ 3
•H 0
U 3
ai rH
(X 1=
CO O
u
•s

> eg
U (H
U 4J
5"
2 §
to
0) •
2 z

00 -d"
O CM

r^ in
^ CM

r- co
rH O



r>* oo
u-i co
O m
i-H rH
rH


r- ON
vo m

op 

ft
CM

CM

Q

$
5

00
CM
OO

r«
>o

CM
00



•a

^




co
r*
"
CO

CM


m
CM

CM
m




O




en
a-



o
vO


o





en

rH
CM

CM

a

s
5

00
rH

*.
§

o
-1



»»
CO
^
o
co


o
co
in
CM
8
en



8
in
CM

m





O
m



CM



8
CM


0





8
§

en
CM
Q
CM

Q

0
5

in
£

o
rH

CM
00



00

CM
-d-

rH

CM
8

m
m
en


0
00


CM
CM
en




O
CM



S

rH

O
co


o
00
m




o
o

r^
CM
Q




rH
5

rH
0

00
rH

O




CM
rH
O
o



•»
o

vO




0
rv
rH

«






t-H



rH



CM



en





O
en

^
X)

"•

Q

in
5

n
o

00
I-H

o




CM
O
^
O



•a
O

S




m
*£>
t-H

en





CO
en
CM



rH
1


CM
T


iQ





0

00
NO

^

Q

s
^

rH
0

m
•-1

O




rH
O ,
o
0



m
o

rH




S
t-H

CM
CM





vO
CM
CM



CM
rH
1


CM
1


00





8

r*
^

rH



r*.
5

CM
in
CO
en
en
o
o
t-H
m
^



vO
t-4
rH
m

CM
en

m
CO

8

rH
^

O
s

o
00
00





R



o
rH

fv

0
CSJ


O
CM





1

00
CO



ti

rH
^f

(0
in

o
3
rH
*
o



0
in
CM
CO
•*
rH


0
9
en
r*
t-H



m
r-
3

CO
i-H





in
s



i-H
t-H


m
r*.
^J


en





m

en
CM



etf

rH
in

vO
f>

O
£
CM
CM




O
r*
t-H
O



o
^J

00
CO




o
in
CO

CM
rH





O
o



0
•3-



m
CM
CO
fo


rH





O
g
en

en
en



a;

CM
0
O

o>
CM

en
CM
CM
rH
CM




en
o
o
o



oo
o

en
en




o
CO
en
f-H

rH





CO




en



en
rH


CM





O
R
CM

^
en



06

§
m

en
CM

VO
m
O

CM
CM



-*

m
CM



rH
CM
m

CM
CO
en



§
m
rH

S





in
rH



00
CO
CO


o
rH


o
CM





8
m
CM

oo
CM



*

g
in

0
O

ON
>-

o
o



00

o
o



0
o\
vO

o




°
00

0





o
CO
in



o



o
m


o





1

m
CM



&

in
g
in

GO
in

O
tn
O

rH
rH



m
o
m
S.T
CM



0
00
rH
en




O
in

rH
rH

rH
m


o

«•
rH

CMi
o



CO
CM
rH
CM




IT,
§
en
CO
CM




m
en
CM

£





m
en



rH



m
CM
rH
rH


r~(





1
CM

CO
CM



9

£
in

O
0

o
0

•-f
CM



0
CM
-t
(M



0
CM

O

rH


-n
CM

3





Q




S
I


g
'


8





o
o
r~t
tM

a*
-0



g

en
in
r-4
m

-------
                          APPENDIX 6

                   LITTLE OORJMAUGH RIVER
Codes for Tabular Data -
Pages  G-l     Through G-
C - Combination Mines

D - Drift Mines


8 - Strip Mines

Sh- Shaft Mines

R - Refuse Piles

0 - Oil Well

00- Coal Outcrop

A - Active
      Receiving Stream

 1 - Little Conemaugh River

 2 - Unnamed tribs. to Little
      Conemaugh River

 3 - North Branch

 k - South Fork

 5 - Unnamed tribs to South Fork

 $ - Bear Rock Run

 7 - Unnamed tribs. to Bear Rock Run

 8 - Christie Hollow

 9 - Bens Creek

10 - Unnamed tribs. to Bens Creek

11 - Trout Run

12 - Unnamed tribs. to Trout Run

13 - Spring Run

Ik - Unnamed tribs. to Spring Run

15 - Sulphur Creek

16 - Unnamed tribs to Sulphur Creek

17 - Saltlick Run

18 - Bear Run

19 - Clapboard Run

-------
                                                                                                                                         G-l
                *   °
                oo   o
 C <-4
ft




3 i-i
                                                                                     10    (M    O
81
n
00
C

5-
CM
CM

0*
m

oodcso^ino^
O^coor^^rM^r

0 
-------
G-2
>-
TJ
C ~>
3
< w*
of
g
j.
V *&
(0 "Ss
V Xt
C r-l
ffi
c

u
i
'- ri
O 1-1
M


rt
o; T3
*J *s^
M-l r-l
CO r-l
1


>
ft
W T)
Wl 's
11 ,T)
cd rH

B

CT

4J *-^
*H X
13 i-r
y ^

0
e


1
E*
a
o c
•H C.
u :
11
U
Eg

00
c
•rt 6
> CT
*rl Q

,_,


r-«


O
CM



rH


0


CM
0




IA
O




CM



O
O
in
CM

CO
PO








CO
CO
iA
NO
CO


•st
ON
**
CM
^




st
NO

O
^f


o
m


CM
•st


m
00
m
CO





o
o
CO



NO



o
o
CM

^
CO








CO
§
irt
^
0


00
vO

^
O




n
c*

o
fn
,_!


O
r*j
-»


r-l



^.
ao
CM
1-1





CT\





rf



O


.n
-*








w
r-t
iA

rH
I-H
m
O




rs
CM,

r-
n
m


CO
t-H
o
in
O


O



O
CO

CM
m




0
ON
CM



tA



O
rH

i~4
ro








Q
NO
0
iA
rH
ro


C7>
CM

O
-*




fJN
O

O
o


CM
iA
1


O
CO


CM
lA
CO
CM
lA




CX>





0



8


•st
NO








Q
0
iA
NO
0


0
NO

tA
0






ro





in

st



CO



O
iA
ON


^
CM








a
§
\r>
NO
rn
CM


r-
CO

st
ON




ro
r-t
ro
CO
o
r-.
CM

CO
tA
0
Nf>
CO


rs.
^


O


CO
CO
CO



IA
CM

r-t


in



O
O
NO
CM

r-
CM








a
ON
O
lA
NO
rH


VO
rsj

rH
0




rH
O

0
o


CM
0
iA


O
O
CO


O
o

o
r*.
i



^


i


O



iA


ON
NO








Q
O
xA
(A
O


rH
CM

CM
0




ON
0
o
0
CM
o


CM
CO


st
CM


ON
O

rs-





CM
CO




CO



m
CM
CO


en
•*








rt
rn"
«n
00
o


ON
ON

ON
tA




in
,_,

ro
CO
CO


CO
o
o
CO


^
LA
tA

iA
CM

•f>

NO
CM


o
m
CM



CN
CO
CO


o
o
m


^
CO








Q
CM
m

-------
G-3





























s
>
a
i
§

a
M
,J












>
il
c — »
«c
8
>

83
-S

(t
U
O r-t
H~i

>
ffl
T3
0) -^
v Ji
W — *
UH
r— 4
3 -,
f/J *•
61
E
>
to
« TJ
0» V.
2:2
•5
5^
>
xx!
4J J3
V* rH
TJ
51
8
l>4
«
U g
v4 t
W-t *.
•H 0
U 3
U TJ
a c
«,§
=5
R
?«
a> S
U u
«sw
«
II
JP
1*

0
rg
0
O



0
0



Csl
0

so
-»
r>.



§
vO

ON
r-.




r*

rH
in
CM
o


xO
O
00
g
vD

O
S
ft
o
ft
CM

f*
CM
O
CM
^O
ft
O
*£>
O

CO

m
r»
o
-*
-*
00^

"~l
in
o
r^
g
5


8
CM

fl
•tf

&
•&
m
CM
r-l
0*
ft
00
CM
CM
fi
-i
r+
S



g
vO


\0
«n

a
r*
u^
O
•»
pg

m o «-* ^  m »-**>. o
  f>
ON ^ O fl fO
r-l *M r-l in
a * <* a a M
8r-l 

s
*
M
r-4
m
00
r-*
ON
CM
-»
CM
00
ON
r*

v
CM
in
oo
vO


o
-*
fl
CM
OD
ft
IN.



m
CM
o

00
fv
r-




0
8
?


m
*




0
r*.
m

en





r*-
r^
CM
-


r>.
ON
r-l



I


CM
f*

0
3
m
in
00
CM



m
en
r^
r*



rH
r^.



r-4


8
r>4
"^
o
r^
\D



O
CM
NO
S
<»


o
r>
-»
$



|
rH

r-
CM
*f
O
m
CO
m
rH
O
m
fM
0


r*.
CM
O



CM
en

o»




m
*£>
fi

r*.





CM
r*.
CM
CM


vO
sO
CM



S
*o


o
-J
•^
W
SO
r>
m
Csl
O


vO
00
r-l


in
r*

in
oo
r-




m
ON
V*
S
-
f»
*n
^H
r-t
CM
cr
f»
•^>



CO
s*
fi
""
ro
fi
in



O
r-«
r-«
fl
in




O
i-4
00
r-

-------
G-4























of
5
3
I
i
8
3
H
5















^,
-3

iS
C
L
< C!
>
•3
«* "v,
n .0
8"
I"1
3
k
c-3
85
M .-*
^J
4J t-t
-1
Sulface
;/l lb/da>
»
.1
M ^
g£
•a
ic
IP
>
^
4J JQ
•o "*
Sc

8

u C
ft U
u :
««s
3
00
Si
« I
(*

p
80
z*

omooiAmOQ<^*$O*sitsr>

fM


*AU*>fMO*«J(**^^V0*MP"tp^QQQO
r^ i-* ^4 fM Is* ^3®
^*tAOOfM^»p|>4Ofn's>OfS1(4>0^
OOOOf-^-OOOitOOO-t
00


lAco^iAMfMOO^fMtnnr^o^-T
ifi O © Q »J ^ M n* r-H ^ O ^O O *A
"^iO>OO^AQOr^N'4'COO^<* ^^ ^
OOOO^fsifMO^-ffOOOr-
» - ~ 2 5

r-vtAm«Jt©lAC\|sOrHQOQ»Q*OOO
•3* *£T 00 v> ^O >-* «
t-«r- Q*fi»^ ODOO*-|rnOfM
G t-J CM. r~> CM
» *-• CM
OOOOOQ^QQOOQOtA
•,-r('igCM^<'^

P-* vO C^ ^4 QO IA lA^tA^f^tOOO
r^kA MO*^ f**O CSIO^f^
(M *-• 00 »A
* ~*

CMfO*O
~* CM •-»
fMOcnrsiOncMCMoOPsiroficniA
h»

§Q O
5 00 Q^^S99OQQ9Q
»-« SeO(si5rio3'OO*SiA
-
r^.QOO^^^'OO'^SF'^^CONO^


^a- ^ ,4^^


UCACO«ltSuUfl«MOO««CQ
K^«M
^^^yrTttAtfStfjdj^v^Sin
iAtA(AtAiAlAtAiAlA«AlAtAtAiA

tA

•"•

»H
00
(M
*
iA



fM
*
pv
CM
5

o
8
iA
CM
I
CM
h*.
lA


§

00
00


o
o
CM
in


|

o>


(•4


O
HI
S
o
|T|
in


r*
-3
«*
^




^
-T

PH

-*
IA
»A
«M
O
in

O


s

o
Cvl
rg
fg

1

OK
CO
CM

8
(M
"
00





•
3
tA
N <4 N cs> «s»
0*> .-< O « N
 o e* •»
0> <^ IA -- r^-
lA
P** 0* O f"- -<
00 fv -4 CM *
OP O fM •"* M

o
>A SO O "^ *
CM -Jj "v «-«
*-«
CT* ^^ ^1 *M
* lA
•tf
»A O IA O O
h- *-J »A *A O
^ (SJ _J
O» «M — 00 C*
i" O ^^ c*l \p
O
(SI

SO iA ^O *M
•-^ CM «-< tA

^ fO in
3 «*» *° C* ^
^ *-
•-I
lA CM tA tA O
••J CS| r+ *J lA
fM CM
CM CM -j o n
00 -H ^. s£.
(M m
(SI

O O 05 Q O
*st s
N
in tf\ c^ oo (^
«si n m CM 
-------
                              APPENDIX  H

                              STONY CREEK

                        Codes for tabular data

                        	Source Type	
               page  E-l through H-8
          C - Combination Mine

          D - Drift Mine

          S - Strip Mine

          Sh-Shaft Mine

         	Receiving Stream
          R - Refuse Pile

          P - Preparation Plant

          A - Active

          * - Tunnel
 1.  Stony Creek

 2.  Paint Creek

 3.  Little Paint Creek

 4.  Seese Run

 5.  Weaver Run

 6.  Shade Creek

 7.  Dark Shade Creek

 8.  Little Dark Shade Creek

 9.  Laurel Run

10.  Beaverdam Run
     (Shade Creek)

11.  Miller Run
12.  Roaring Fork

13.  Solomon Run

14.  Falls Run

15.  Wells Creek

16.  Oven Run

17.  Bens Creek

18.  S. F. Bens Creek

19.  Soap Hollow Run

20.  Reitz Creek

21.  Schrock Run
22.  Beaverdam Creek
     (Stony Ireek)
23.  Roaring Run

24.  Quemahoning Creek

25.  Higgins Run

26.  Twomile Run

27.  Lamberts Run

28.  Spruce Run

29.  Boone Run

30.  Beaverdam Creek
     (Quemahoning)

31.  Grove Run

32.  Calenders Run

33.  Clear Run
                                   H

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                    H-l
            O     CM     O     CM
                                              O    CM     \O     r-<
            O     CM     CO     *-*     CO    O
                                                                                                     m     co     m     CM     oo    O    r-i
                                                                          in     I-H    co     O     in
                                                                                                                   O     o     r-t    o    o     CM
            CM     sO     CO

            O     •*     r->
CM     in     ro

o
                                                            r-t     CM     CM
              mONOOOoONO'.tcocococoOr'.so

              *-*EM»3'rHr-»(''«-u"'sOO*nroN0coinco
            O     -*     O     r-f

            O     O     O     O
                            CO    co


                            r*    O
                                                ro     ro     ro     CM

                                                O     O     CM     O
                                                                                                                                                     co     m     CM
            OOoOr-iOcMininr».cM-i     -*
                                              CO     CO     rH     CM
                                                                                              NO     CM     Csl     00
                                                            ro     m     ON
                          CO     CM    i-H
73  3
                                                                          co    m    ON     oo     ON
   %
                                       m    m     CM
                                                            co     co     ro
                                                                                                                                              CO     CM     CO     ro
 >

 0)  (U
                                                                                                                   CO     O     O    CO
                         m    m    m     co     oo
                                              O     rH     eg     ro
                                                                                m    co     ON
                                                                   oo    oo    oo    oo
            CMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                                                                                     CM     CM     CM     CM    CM
            ininmmmminmmminininminininininminminm

-------
                                                                                                                                                                                                         H-2
                                             o
                                             o
o
o
                                                                                                                   O     rH
n     o
t-^     O
                        1-1     O     vO
                                                                                       l-«     t*l
                                                                                       O
                                                                                              r-t     ^     *O     ^
                                                                             o     i-<
                                                                             O     CO
e
da;
                                      O       e
             T*  re
             QJ  01

-------
                                                                                       H-3
X
.o.

"ff
X
rt
•o

>
X
T)

ff
X
>
X
5
\
-
6
>,
rt
ta
J?
.-i
i1
|
En

rH
ON
O
so
"*
CO
IA
*
CO
CM

0

tn
2


8
PJ

,_,
m


Q
r-l
CA
•*

-
CO
O
-0
CM
^
i-H
O
o
sO
8
CO
CO

CO

IA
tA
CM


8
so

CO
CM


Q
CO
r^.
CM
^
CO
IA
^
sD
sO
„
K
VO
s
in
rv
O
2
S
o
00

^o
o
ON

s
ON


1

CO
CM


Q
CO
CO
CM
•*
r-
r*.
rH
SO
rH
lA
i£>
sO
O
rH
3
CO
CM
O
ON
i—l
rH
O
CM
sO

sO
rH

O
sD
O


|

OO
CM


O
CO
tn
0
rM
CO
m
+
O
CO
^
sO
O
CS(
CO
lA
ro
S
lA
CO
|

3

CM
sO


O
CO
CO

ON
CM


O
m
CO
U"!
CM
n
so
CM
CO
rO
CO
so
ON
00
i-t
m
CO
fO
sO
0
00
CO
rH
lA
O
CO
O
CM
sO

IA
CO

O
CO
r-
5


8

0«
CM


«
sO
O
vO
CO
rH
sO
O
CT>
<—l
ON
O
ON
CM
CM
CM
O
CO
sO
f-
CM
ro

IA
CM

8
•a


8
lA

^
n


Q
00
m
in
O
in
00
tM
O
in
C.J
O
0
M
O
3
0
so
CM
O
8

r-
i-H

O
lA


8
CO

so
CO


C)
CO
rH
"*
lA
rH
0>
O
sO
CM
CM
^~*
fM
CO
O
ro
CM
§
<£>
t-t
0
O

0

O
in
CM
o
CO


o
0
SO

lA
CO


Q
O
IA
CO
lA
OincooOfOON*or«-coO(Mso(Mco
OrHOOwmcorHQOOOooo
O    CM    00
O    r-"    r^
CM    so     ON    O     sO
rH    00     O>    O
O    CO     rH    IA
                                                   oo     so    o     o    ^-     co    m
                                                   O     O    O     O    O     O    co
                                             —'    O     O
                                                                       8    8
                                                                             \O     r-t    rH

-------
H-4
X
S t3

C -O
3
rH rH
""If
n
^
rt
01 "^
W (Tj
>H 4J
U U
a*§
to c
o
U
33
a.
00
c

•5 3
0 4J
(U U)
a.
0)
U
V4 0)
3 P-
O X
W H
0) •
C O
ON
,_,



sD
SO

^
0






-
.
-t


sO
£
ro


0


00




ro
ON
CM




CO
,_(

CM




O
lA
00



in
*o


^
CM


Q


r.
CO
O
O



CM
rH

0
O





CO
O
o
.-*,


o
ro



O

CM





CO

0



ON


CM




0
CO



sD



^
CM


a


00
£
CM
Os



00
SO

rH
^.j.
rH





lA
CO
m


0
IT-.
o
CO
0
CM

O
CM

CM

O



O
00
ro




m
CO

CO




8
m



in



^



o


ON
in
tn
0



tn
f^

e*j
0






cs
O
O



0
•*


in


rg




00

m



vo
CM

«




in
CM



.n



^
Cvl


U


o
S
o
o



o
o

VO
,_,






«

^



0
CM


§

rH
00




o
CM
00
CM



"*
M
O






"
CO
SA



O
sO


O
m
rH






CM
sO
CM




o
CM
rH
fO




o
8



00
CM


CO



Q


lA
°
lA
CM
^,



•d-
^
00
CO
o





sO

^
O


CO
3
CO
rH


O
lA
CO
CO





O
CM
rH



0
CO
CO







O
CO
QO
•d-


lA
CO

CO




o
8



in
CM


CO



Q


0
S
o

so
O
^



CM
ON


0
O
ON
rH






O
so
ro
CM
ON


0
ON

«




8
O



r*.
CM


00



Ul


CM
-d-
IA
sO
in



CO
sO

^
1-t





tM

CTx
*$



o
CM
r-


§
CO

CO

'•O



CM
"*
IA
rH
(O

0


lA




o
o
sO



O\
CM






O


ro
S
rH
O



rH
ro

O
O





vO
rH
ro
"S|



O
CO


O
CO

so





CM
r-

M
CM


O
sO

ro




8



03
CM






Q


s.
S
ro
o\
O
sO

sD
O
00
^
J^
r*




CM
O
CO
Cs!

"A
T
r-,
IP
CO
ro
§
rH
lA
00

n



o
•3-

CO
ro
CO
so
O
"A
CO
O
ro
so



O
8



rH







O


tA
IA
00
*A



rH
sO
rH
00
rH





-1
If
CO
r-t



~
-vt


iA
CM
lA
"
sD
rH
"-'



O
O
vO
CO
o
rM

lA
lA

O
CO




O
O
CM



CM







Q


sO
lA
O
O



O
o

o
o





<*•
o
^








o
CO
CM







S
rH

1


lA

1
-H




o
o
so



^







Q


r^
iA
0
o



o
o

^
o





•JO
o
r-
'•*




CM


O
ro

rH
CO




CO





rH
CM
1
O




O
o
so



«M







(H


CO
£
O
o



o
o

ON
O





SC
O
-t
^



ON
ON


O
CM

rH

~J



CO
O

••O



CO
CM
I
0
ro




O
o



CM







(H


ON
tn
ro
O



m
CM

ro
rH





ON
O
0
_J



CO
so


o
m

sO





ro


CM


in
CM






O
O
CM



CM







*


O
tA








D


ro
lA
r-t
,_»



CM
^j

r-
r-





ON
CM
O
r.



0\
OS


ro

ON

^



O
CM
O



m


N.
"



O
o
CM



rH
ro



rH


Q


s,
iA
ro
U~l
CM



-------
H-5































B
o
£
£
tfl

























X
n)
-O
C -<
rH rH
< ^
ff
« -0
OB -~-
U jO
C rH
«
CO
J --I
ff
^
fl)
M r-t
rH
O *"--
H eo
13


*o

0) rC
«J
MH
"1?


rt
CO "O
» ^
C rH
•a
14
rff t-l
* 1?


n
•a
*J ,£>
•O
O *-!

1
P

1

tn
0)
U
U C
•H n)
•fH U
0 =>
rti »rt
0. C
C/l O
o
£

MI
C
HI r»
O JJ
Of CO
pa
V
U
II
8 0-
ON
O
m
m
o





o
0
0

^
CM


Ov



O
00


r-




vO
CM


CO



0
rH
•-I


CM





8



O
sf




04
CM
m
o
o
rH
O
CM
O




CO
rH
O
rH

rH
r*.


00
m


§


3




CM
CO


0



ON




CM





0
in



rH
m




«
CO
CM
00
rH

s
r*-
CM




0
C*
o
00

0
o
5

^
CO
in


in
00
r-


rH
fH



NO
CO


o
CO



m
NO
CM


m
CM





§
CM


O
CO




a
1
CO
rH

NO
O
00




r-.
CO
00
CM

CO
rH


CO
CO
rH

o
m
m


rH
vO



O
CO


sO
**


rH
rH
CM


O
00
rH




8
•"*


CO
CO




fl
m
m
NO
CO
CM

rH
rH
ON
CO




m
*"*
NO
0
rH
rH
-d-


m
CM
NO
rH

O
CO
NO


CO
rH
ON



$
CO


00
ro
r-.


NO
00
CM


m
CM




8
CM
rH


Csl
fO




o
NO
3
ov
CM
oo
o
CM
0
CO




rH
CM
m
o
m
rH
m
CO

CM
m
rH
t-H

8
00


CO
CM




0
«T




0
CM
vO
a
Ov
vO
n

o
CM
vo




VO
CO
^
00
-5
Ov
vO
CM

O

r-l

1


CM
CO




CO
CM


m
ON


in
CM
m


o
m
rH




8
00
rH


^
•*




0
vO
r»
r^
n

CM
CM
rH
vD




vO
CO
00
Ov
vO
CO
rH
«J

00
vO
rH

O
00
OV


rH
f^









8
rH


CM
CO




Q
NO
rH
O
NO
rx
0
0




CM
NO
^
O

ON
O


^



in
in
m


ro




CM
CM


•tf



m
CM
CO


fH





8
CM
*H


CM
CO




O
i
o
o
rH
CM
m
o




m
2
CO
0

•o
,>.


rH
CM


O
00
m


fH




CM
CO


00



fH

CM


CO





1
rH


o
CO




U
1
f»
o

0\
CO
o




rx
"*
Ov
CM

Pvl
o
-it

in



O
CM


^




00
CM


0
CO



vO

st


-o





8
"-1


o
CO




U
Ov
vO
o
o

3
o
o




^
"^
o
o

CO
^


o



in
r-


o




g



0



o
m
-^


o





§
CM


O
CO




w
o
r*
l^
c*
O
0
CO
NO
"M
rH




CO
in
in
NO

0
NO
CM
CM
07
00


8
m
CO
CM
CM
NO





rs.








m
CM
CO





8
o
o

o
CO




a.

^


(M





|
CM


O
CO




O
CO
-»
in
o
d
0
o
CM
d




Ov
t-H
O
CM

r-t
t-H
*M

CM
in


§
m


3




CM
5


CM
CM



NO
CM
CM


CO





1
•H


ON
"*




Q
m
CO
CO
r —
ON
O




o
o
so
^

CO
ON
r^


2


m
o
in


3




o
§


o



in

rH


CO





8
CO


o
CO




Q
m

-------
H-6
(Tj

C rH
1
3
rH rH

""If

«
s^
cfl
60
C
S v^
If
X
H XI
rH
i-H
d)
0 rH
" t

cfl
 E
•H a
a) a
ai
o
II

S£
00
rH


m
in
CM
00
CM


rH
m

ro



sf

CM


m
fv
rH
rH
m
NO
rH

m
NO
rv
CO
rH



O
CM
NO

00
rH



8

CM


NO
CM


O
CM


Q
t-t
m
in
NO
CM


00
ON

vt

rH

0
o


CO
o

o
0

^
0

o


0
CM
rH

Os



ON
CM
rH
CM




CO
CM

NO



O
CO
CO



rv
^


CM


W
m
tn
m
CM
•"*


NO
rH

wO
NO
r~*

tH
CO
CM
rv
NO

CM
CO
CM

00
8


o
o
rH

-------
H-7
£

H ja
C rH
•r-t
rH rH
'''if
s.
QJ *O
CO "x.
rH


g
rH
PM
111
O
o C
•H CD
•H (J
i.'B
M 0

*
1
0) 4)
O l-l
0)
o o>
si
O H
cn

o
c •
So
z
m
o


rH
CM
CO
CO






tO
rH
rH
0


in
0


to
CM


m
CS|
0
rH
Ot
O
CM




O
CO
CO
00


o
(SI



O
§


^
"^

CM
Ul



m
m
00



00
rH
O
-*






Ot
CO
in
2


rH
o>
rH

O
CO


8
cn
rH

CM




m
DO
CM
rH
vO
rH


00



O
lA
vO


O
^

O



00
in
in
CM
0


*,
rH
rH
O






CO
o
o
o


xt
o


m



m
o
CM
ON
CM





CM
xt
CM
VO


0
rH



g
CO


to
"^

I/I



CM
rH
m
i-.



CSI
to
0,
r»






*t
o
rH
ON
<*


m
vO


o
CM

o
vO
fX,
rH





CO
o
X*
ON
rH


O
lA
»^

0



m
in
rH

CM





O
in
8
00

m



§


CO
CM

CO
01



CO
(SI
in
r-
O


CM
in
ot
^






O
s
CM
O


rH
rH


00
O
rH


0
lA
rx.







^
CM
en
lA
iA
00


CM
rH



O
o


o
xt

(s|
CO
CO



(SI
m
m
o
o


o
0
CJ>
O






to
CM
r-*
rH


to
J.


rH
rH
(SI


m
CO
in
o
CM
rH




CM
CO
in
o
rH

O
CO



8
en


IA
rx,

CM
O



CM
lA
»A
CM
O


IA
0
00
CM






xt
^
ON
CM


O
lA


CM
I"*-


in
lA
00
rH
ON

iA




O
3
rH
3
rH
lA
00
cn

CM
en



§
en

CM
cn

CM



r*
CM
IA
IA
rx,
cn


rH
fx.
0
rH






CM
o
CM
ON
rH


O
Ot
CO
(SI
00



o
Csl
00
rH

rH





09
•3
CO
00
m
CM

"
J-



I


lA
CM

CM
&



00
CM
IA
in
ON
PX


CTt
rH
1-4
^
CO






rH
in
.0
(SI


ON
CO


•H
CM


O
CM
in
to





00
OS
>o
rH
O
m
CM

in
in



o
m
CO


m
CO

rH
a



in
in
in
00
00


O
(SI
^
o-






o •

m
CO


00
o


Ot
(SI


in
Ot
CM
in
CM





(SI
rH
tO
m
rH


tO
CO


o
m


rH
CO

o



*
in
in
o
0


co
o
rH
O






CM
2
O
O


vO
rH


IA
rH



O
ON
CM
rH
o
CM
tr
(-1



^
^
m
o






tO
csl
in
o


00
(SI


rH
00



O
^






O
rH
00
%


m
rH



8
00


rx
cn

9



r-

o


00
o
00
o






oo
CM
rx
^


O
ON
xt
rH
lA
lA
CM


O
IA
CO
0
rH
CM




O
cn
r-.

CM

lA



O
8


to
•*








00

in
in
0-
^
in





IT
(O
^
rH
en
CO

rH
rH
CM

-0
00
00
vO
rH
lA
rx,
0
rH
0
CM
en




vO
vO
en
vO
lA
ON
CM

ON
O
cn
rH

O
8


^
m

rH
9





-------
         sOvfrcooorHOcoomo

         CMOOOOOlO-^OrHvJ
                                                                                      O     CO    O     O


                                                                                      GO     CO    O     CM
                                                 ooooooooooo
         mcoooooooom
                                                                                                8
                                                                                                          8
                       co    o     o
                                           CM    O     r-*     O    O     O     O
                                                                                                CM     co    o     r-.
                       ocMinoooooomo     O'    o    o     o

                       in    Os     rHCO*3:-tfCOCMCMO*n*^'*tfCMO
                             rH    cs|     \O    CM     0*i     *O    in     O



                             O    CM     CO    rH     O     O
                                                                                      O    CO     CO    O

                                                                                             \o     o    o

                                                                                      O    O\           co


                                                                                             CM
                                                                            3     3    °    §
                                    moooooooooooo
                       co    o    in
                                                                            §
                       *ri{r)r-tC*4r-4r-»C*4*O

                       OoOQOfOCMCOCOvO
                                                                            CM     CO    O
                                                                                          rH    m     CO
                       o     m    o
                                           0

                                           3
m     o    o     o
^     CM    CM     CM
                                                                  8
                                                                  00
*n     o
CM     O
m     m
                                                        oo     CM    o    m     CT»     «o    I-H
                                                        co     CM    co    so     co     m    r*»
                in     oo
                oo     CM
                           ovOvoofOcMOcM     ^OCMCM**
                           cocomcMinfor^r-.     voininmo
                           r-»coi-icorH^-cM           mcricorHCM
                                                                            O     CO     rH    1^    
-------