COOPERATIVE MINE
DRAINAGE SURVEY
Kiskiminetas River
Basin
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Wheeling Field Office
Wheeling, West Virginia
-------
COOPERATIVE MINE DRAINAGE SURVEY
KISKEMINETAS RIVER BASIN
APRIL 1972
U.S. EPA Region III
Regional Center for Environmental
Information
1650 Arch Street (3PM52)
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Prepared By:
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Wheeling Field Office
Wheeling, West Virginia
Regional Center for Hmironmental Information
US EPA Region III
16SO Arch St
Philadelphia. PA 19101
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES IV
LIST OF FIGURES VII
Summary 1
Recommendations 7
Background 10
Introduction 16
Purpose and Scope 21
Geology and Groundwater 23
Coal Mining 27
KISKIMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES - 31
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
Summary and Conclusions 32
Description of Area 33
Stream Water Quality 33
Sources of Mine Drainage 38
Pollution Abatement 51
Principal Sources 58
IOYALHANNA CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 67
Summary and Conclusions 68
Description of Area 70
Stream Water Quality 70
Sources of Mine Drainage 76
Pollution Abatement 87
Principal Sources 95
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
CONEMAUGH RIVER MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 105
Summary and Conclusions 10°"
Description of Area 107
Stream Water Quality 107
Sources of Mine Drainage 112
Pollution Abatement 128
Principal Sources 129
BIACKLICK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 135
Summary and Conclusions 136
Description of Area 137
Stream Water Quality 138
Sources of Mine Drainage 1^2
Active Mines 157
Pollution Abatement
Principal Sources 167
TWO LICK CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 175
Summary and Conclusions 176
Description of Area 177
Stream Water Quality 178
Sources of Mine Drainage 182
Pollution Abatement 205
Principal Sources . 211
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 219
Summary and Conclusions 220
Description of Area 221
Stream Water Quality 222
Sources of Mine Drainage 222
Pollution Abatement
Principal Sources
STONY CREEK MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY 251
Summary and Conclusions 252
Description of Area 253
Stream Water Quality 253
Sources of Mine Drainage 258
Active Mines 29U
Pollution Abatement 302
Principal Sources 307
REFERENCES 312
APPENDICES 315
Appendix A - Stream Water Quality, Survey Findings, 1966 A-l
Appendix B - Mine Drainage Data, Kiskiminetas River B
Appendix C - Mine Drainage Data, Loyalhanna Creek c
Appendix D - Mine Drainage Data, Conemaugh River D
Appendix E - Mine Drainage Data, Blacklick Creek E
Appendix F - Mine Drainage Data, Two Lick Creek F
Appendix G - Mine Drainage Data, Little Conemaugh River G
Appendix H - Mine Drainage Data, Stony Creek H
iii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 5
Kiskiminetas River basin
2 Mine drainage loadings by source type, 6
Kiskiminetas River basin
3 Stream water quality sampling stations, Kiskiminetas 35
River main stem and minor tributaries
U Stream water quality data, Kiskiminetas River, 3&
main stem and minor tributaries
5 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 55
Kiskiminetas River, main stem and minor tributaries
6 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Kiskiminetas 56
River, main stem and minor tributaries
7 Principal mine drainage sources, Kiskiminetas River, 60
main stem and minor tributaries
8 Stream water quality sampling stations, Loyalhanna 72
Creek
9 Stream water quality data, Loyalhanna Creek fk
10 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 91
Loyalhanna Creek
11 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Loyalhanna 92
Creek
12 Principal mine drainage sources, Loyalhanna Creek 96
13 Stream water quality sampling stations, Conemaugh 109
River, main stem and minor tributaries
lU Stream water quality data, Conemaugh River, main 110
stem and minor tributaries
15 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 123
Conemaugh River, main stem and minor tributaries
iv
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table fege
16 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Conemugh 127
River, main stem and minor tributaries
17 Principal mine drainage sources, Conemaugh River, 130
main stem and minor tributaries
18 Stream water quality sampling stations, Blacklick 139
Creek
19 Stream water quality data, Blacklick Creek lUo
20 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 159
Blacklick Creek
21 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Blacklick 163
Creek
22 Principal mine drainage sources, Blacklick Creek 166
23 Stream water quality sampling stations, Two Lick 179
Citeek
2k Stream water quality data, Two Lick Creek 180
25 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 206
Two Lick Creek
26 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Two Lick 208
Creek
27 Principal mine drainage sources, Two Lick Creek 210
28 Stream water quality sampling stations, Little 223
Conemaugh River
29 Stream water quality data, Little Conemaugh River 221*
30 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, 2U2
Little Conemaugh River
31 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Little 2UU
Conemaugh River
32 Principal mine drainage sources, Little 2U6
Conemaugh River
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table Page
33 Stream water quality sampling stations, Stony Creek 255
3^ Stream water quality data, Stony Creek 256
35 Mine drainage loadings by receiving stream, Stony Creek 297
36 Mine drainage loadings by source type, Stony Creek 301
37 Principal mine drainage sources, Stony Creek
vi
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1 Water quality sampling stations, Kiskindnetas River 11
basin, 1966
2 Availability of ground water, Kiskindnetas River basin 26
3 Stream water quality sampling locations, Kiskindnetas 37
River, main stem and minor tributaries
U Mine location map, Kiskindnetas River, main stem and 53
minor tributaries
5 Principal source location map, Kiskindnetas River, 6l
main stem and minor tributaries
6 Stream water quality sampling locations, Loyalhanna Creek 75
7 Mine location map, Loyalhanna Creek 89
8 Principal source location map, Loyalhanna Creek 97
9 Stream water quality sampling locations, Conemaugh HI
River, main stem ar. i minor tributaries
10 Mine location map, Conemaugh River, main stem and 125
minor tributaries
11 Principal source location map, Conemaugh River, main
stem and minor tributaries
12 Stream water quality sampling locations, Blacklick Creek
13 Mine location map, Blacklick Creek l6l
I1* Principal source location map, Blacklick Creek 169
15 Stream water quality sampling locations, Two Lick Creek l8l
16 Mine location map, Two Lick Creek 203
17 Principal source location map, Two Lick Creek 213
18 Stream water quality sampling locations, Little 225
Conemaugh River
19 Mine location map, Little Conemaugh River 239
20 Principal source location map, Little Conemaugh River
vii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure Rtge
21 Stream water quality sampling locations, 257
Stony Creek
22 Mine location map, Stony Creek 299
23 Principal source location map, Stony Creek 305
viii
-------
SUMMARY
Each of the sub-basin watersheds of the Kiskiminetas River
basin experience the widespread problem of coal mine drainage
pollution. Various measures are needed to reverse the water
quality degradation that has occurred in the seven watershed
areas. A brief summary of each watershed follows:
Kiskiminetas River, main stem and minor tributaries
A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,^75
acres of surface mined land were investigated in this area. The
total effluent from the discharging sources was nearly 6.U million
gallons per day (mgd). The total acid load discharged to the
Kiskiminetas River and its minor tributaries below the community
of Saltsburg was 57,880 Ib/day. Seventeen principal mine drainage
sources were located in the study area. These sources discharged
a total net acid load of U6,6l3 Ib/day, about 8l percent of the
acid load discharged by all sources in the watershed.
Loyalhanna Creek
The water quality degradation resulting from coal mine drain-
age in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed is most apparent below the
community of Latrobe. A total of 52 discharging sources and ap-
proximately 900 acres of surface mined land were investigated
during the study period. The total net acid load contributed by
the 52 sources was 65,U07 Ib/day. Approximately 96 percent of
this acid load (65,^07 Ib/day) was contributed by 15 principal
-------
sources (Mine No.'s 5177, 5356, and 536*0 contributed a combined
acid load of nearly 25 tons per day.
Conemaugh River
A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately 1,700
acres of surface mined land were investigated during the study.
The total net acid load discharged to receiving streams was
35,10U Ib/day. Abandoned drift mines and coal refuse piles were
the major sources of mine drainage discharge. A total of six prin-
cipal source sites were located in the watershed. These sources
contributed a total net acid load of 30,U95 Ib/day, or about 86
percent of the total watershed acid load.
Blacklick Creek
Several hundred mining sites and approximately 1,675 acres of
surface mined land were investigated in the Blacklick Creek water-
shed. A total of l6l sites discharging at the time of survey con-
tributed an acid load of 273,073 Ib/day. During the study, fourteen
discharges emanating from active mines were inventoried in the water-
shed. The acid load from these sources represented about one-half of
the total watershed load. However, the pollutional loading from
active mines has since been significantly reduced by the installation
of treatment facilities. Eighteen principal sources of abandoned
mine drainage were located during the study. These sources discharged
a combined acid load of more than 125,000 Ib/day to receiving streams
in the Blacklick Creek watershed.
-------
Two Lick Creek
Abandoned drift mines, shaft mines, and mine refuse piles
were the major sources of mine drainage pollution in the Two Lick
Creek watershed. During the study, a total of 17^ discharging
mine sites contributed an acid load of 36,6^5 lb/day to receiving
streams in the study area. Twelve principal sources of mine drain-
age were identified during the survey. These twelve sites contri-
buted an acid load of 29,11^ lb/day, about 80 percent of the total
acid load discharged by all 17^ sources.
Little Conemaugh River
A total of 99 discharging sources and approximately 1,1*00
acres of surface mined land were investigated in the study area.
Discharges from these sources totalled more than 29 million gal-
lons per day (mgd). Abandoned drift mines and shaft mines were
the major source of mine drainage discharge in the Little Conemaugh
River basin. Seven principal drainage sources contributed about
80 percent of the total basin-wide acid load (153,570 lb/day).
Stony Creek
Approximately 5*700 acres of surface mined land and 199 dis-
charging sources were investigated in the Stony Creek watershed.
Discharges from the coal mine sources totalled 23.7 million gallons
per day. The total net acid load was 97,310 lb/day. Abandoned
drift mines were the major contributor of mine drainage pollution.
Shaft mines and mine refuse piles were also significant contribu-
tors of acid discharge. Thirteen principal mine drainage sources
-------
were identified in the Stony Creek watershed. These sources dis-
charged a total net acid load of 6l,?6l Ib/day, about 63 percent
of the total acid load discharged by all 199 sources in the water-
shed.
A summary by watershed study area for the Kiskitninetas River
basin is presented in Table 1. A summary by source type for all
mine discharges in the basin is presented in Table 2. Load values
shown in these tables reflect the conditions measured during the
1968 study and are exclusive of any mine drainage treatment faci-
lities installed since the date of inventory.
-------
£>
cd
H
e
cd
CU
JJ
CO
60
C
•H
>
•H
CD
O
0) C
(J H
CO
rS Cd
_o »JO
CO t-l
60 CU
c >
1-1 1-1
^3 PM
ed
o co
jj
0) CD
60 C
cd -H
C E
•H f-l
Cfl rVS
t-1 CO
T3 -H
t^
a)
c
g
§
3
c
•H
E
3
rH
CU
CO
cu
C
^~,
>
cd
•o
.0.
I— 1
>
cd
*^
60^
C
C
O
J-i
(-1
"«
jj
o
H
CU
JJ
cd
IJH
3
CO
CO
CO
rH CU
ftf C
JJ T3
O JH
H cd
JJ
55 JJ
•H
cd in
JJ O
O <;
H
cu
60
rH tl
4J ffJ
O 0
H en
•H
Q
MH
O
•
O
"Z
I-*
^\
>
cd
^Q
r—j
X-X
^
S,
flj
*O
•v^
JO
t-H
v^
'P
cd
*x^
^Q
r-l
^
XN
^
cd
-o
^
rH
>«•>
s~\
E
a
w
CO
0)
u
l-i
3
O
CO
cd
CU
^J
T
in
ON
CO
N^f
n
xj-
ON
00
cu l-i
> 0
•H C
QJ -H
E
CO
cd c£J co
JJ CU
cu e 1-1
C CU rJ
•lH JJ Cd
E co jj
•H 3
^ C -Q
CO -H nH
•H g J-I
^4.
t-H
in
M
t-H
VO
f>^
<^
rH
O
0
VO
CM
CO
ON
M
O
^
rH
CO
in
oo
CNI
o
•-1
p^
o
m
VO
m
rH
•t
t— 1
rH
CM
in
v^
cu
vO
vO
CO
CM
0
rH
•s
r^*
*^
i^.
rH
^
H
.CJ
t^
O
•H
hJ
O
H
CO
co
p*.
M
sj-
m
^o
vO
rH
vO
o
CO
m
m
t-H
*
•s
CO
oo
rH
O
p^.
m
CO
m
rH
CO
co
A
o
CM
ON
ON
CU
2
r*t
60
ctf
CU
c
o
CJ
cu
rH
JJ
JJ
•H
HH
vO
CO
oo
M
CM
CM
vO
ON
rH
vO
^
oo
rH
t-H
J>x
ON
n
oo
oo
rH
rH
t-H
CM
•s
t-H
oo
O
rH
CO
o.
ON
rH
vO
o-
•V
vO
rH
ON
ON
rH
^
CU
cu
)H
CJ
^
C
O
JJ
CO
^^
00
t-H
r.
ON
CM
VO
^
VO
CO
Is-
CM
00
rH
s^J-
CM
CO
M
O
|*s»
en
»t
r-f
VO
O
^J-
•s
VO
m
m
ON
oo
ON
oo
rH
f-^
rH
^4.
OO
A
fx.
00
o
rH
OO
CO
H
O
H
-------
o
0.
4J
, 0)
Xi >
CM 09 05
DO
(U C to
r-l ft Cd
Xt t3 JJ
rt cd o)
HOC
1-1 "B
CD -H
00 ^
cd co
5 3
cd
•O
0)
C
if
1?
C rt
•H TJ
3 J3
r-4 r-l
< ^
CO "£
01 rt
C -o
rt ^
00 Xi
C rH
C
o
H >
rt
r-l t)
rt *v
•U Xl
O r-l
H ^
27
rt (t
14-1 TJ
1"^ ^""s
3 XI
CO r-l
N^
CO 0
CO >
1-4 o> rt
cd C -O
4J t3 ^v
0 h Xi
£-4 tfl i—
33 ^^
1 i
0) X/->
z 4J >•
•H Cd
r-4 -O TJ
rt 1-1 ^-v
il ^\ f
O ^ti ^"^
H ^
CO
01
00
it
r-l rt *-\
rt f, 6
4J y 5,
o co e
Hg
0
0 t
14
• r
O O
z co
0)
a
iw
i^
H
01
c.
(
CO
^ O CM
^ r-l f**
1-1 •» 00
CO
\Q ^5 ^^
O -o
u c u -H a e
vu « u-i t) T-I rfl
•rt X> "H y ^4 XI
JU rt JM cd 4J rt
Q ^x Q v^ CO >- '
ON m
CM
~*^
r-l
CO •*
CO CO
CM
O vo
CO ON
r-4
M
in
CM 00
r^ *^
s* m
CM CM
^
CM VO
r-l •*
in vo
i-i •*
r-4
ON CM
O r-
ON
CM
•* vD
O fO
co r^
«t
CO
00 O
CM
1— 1
CO
0)
a
r>
o) C
01 O
C iH
Jrj <"N 4J
^ Cj
a -H -H
•H 4J Xt
Jj o €
JJ (0 O
CO N*^ O
X"\
•a
01
c
o
*o '
c
•2
N"^
CO
oo
00
^
CM
CO
A
CM
00
ON
i-l
M
vO
f^
in
0
i^T
m
o
rH
o"
VO
CM
(^
CO
o"
ON
r-4
CO
00
vO
ON
CM
CO
CO
09 ^N
0) TJ
C 0)
jg g
T3
U C
u-i cd
rt Xi
f. rt
OT ^^
00
0
00
vO
CO
ON
^
r-l
r-l
M
oo
CO
O
ao
ON
m"
o
CO
1— 4
vO
^
0
OQ
r^
^
o"
CO
r-4
vO
ON
vO
vo"
r-4
ON
CO
0)
C
27
>
4J -H
14-1 4J
rt o
X! rt
CO -+S
CO
O
vO
VO
m
oo
CO
m
00
ON
CM
I-l
^
vO
CO
^jT
ON
00
r-4
i-l
00
r-l
^J.
fv
ON"
ON
00
O
O
CM
o
oo
CO
01
r-4
•H
0)
m
3
<4-4
QI
CC
^^
TJ
0)
§
TJ
C
cd
X)
^•^
o r- co o
CM
r-l CM O O
m r^ -^ r>.
^f
in vo r^ CM
m ON CM m
CM m «*
ON o r* O
r-l 00 ON m
CM
>* 00 CM r-l
00 1^ 00 r-4
m vo CM CM
CM O in CM
1-4
r-l •* CM CM
JJ
C
rt
r-i
OH CO
a
c o
0 JJ
•1-4 u en ca
JJ /•> JJ r-4 r-l
Cd 01 3 r-l r-l
(j > O 0) 01
rt «r< » S
O. 4J r-t
01 O « rH W
b rt o T-I to
P4 "^ CJ O O
o
rH
rH
rH
vO
vO
rH
vO
CM
O
rH
rH
rH
i
3
(H
^.
00
1-4
ON"
CM
vO
00
VO
M
VO
CO
f**
n
CM
00
rH
^
CM
cn
o"
r-»
CO
A
rH
vO
ON
*
00
f^
oo
o
i— i
oo
(J
^
Q
E_i
-------
RECOMMENDATIONS
The inventoried watersheds of the Kiskiminetas River basin
are all intrastate water bodies; consequently, the primary respon-
sibility for water pollution control in these areas rests with
Pennsylvania. It is, therefore, recommended that the Commonwealth
proceed to develop a detailed plan to eliminate or significantly
reduce mine drainage pollution in the Kiskiminetas River basin.
It is realized that there are a number of difficult, lengthy,
and expensive tasks involved in any program leading to abatement
of pollutant discharges from inactive underground mining sites. A
very major problem in this realm is the less than complete techni-
cal knowledge available of physical abatement measures. The follow-
ing recommendations are made for the establishment of an abandoned
mine drainage abatement program in the seven inventoried watersheds
of the Kiskiminetas River basin. The recommendations are based on
the water quality measurements performed by the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency during 1966 and the cooperative mine drainage source
investigation conducted in 1968 by the EJft and the Pennsylvania De-
partment of Environmental Resources (DER).
1. Establishment of a mine drainage source abatement priority
listing. Such priorities could be assigned utilizing the
data outlined in this document. The priorities can be
based upon the impact and relative contribution of each
source to the total watershed problem. For example, a
mine discharging high acidity and/or mineral loadings
would be of a higher priority than a discharge of lesser
-------
loading located downstream of the discharge of greater pollu-
tant loading. The priority of some sources may change as a
result of item 3 below. A preliminary priority listing of
principal mine drainage sources is contained under the Pollu-
tion Abatement Section of each individual watershed report.
2, Feasibility studies. Probably undertaken on a contractual
basis, these preliminary studies would have the objectives of
proposing abatement methods for the individual prioritized
sources and estimating the cost of the methods.
3. Characterization of water quality with time. Coincident with
the preliminary feasibility studies, a basin wide water quality
sampling network should be established for repetitive water
quality measurements. The network should include all important
tributary streams receiving mine drainage and a number of loca-
tions on the principal streams. The larger mine drainage
sources should also be included. Flow measurement and chemical
analyses could then be performed at these locations at regular
intervals, preferably weekly or bi-weekly, for a minimum of a
12-month water year.
This phase of the total study will provide data for a pollution
source priority listing based on the annual pollution contribu-
tion of each source. Also, sufficient stream water quality
data will be developed to permit reasonably accurate stream
quality improvement predictions from contemplated corrective
programs.
8
-------
h. Detailed engineering plans. Based on items 2 and 3, detailed
engineering plans and final cost estimates could then be de-
veloped for the most applicable proposal from item 2; that is,
most applicable from the standpoint of the greater water
quality improvement to be obtained for a dollar spent.
5. Construction. Installation of appropriate physical measures
could then be carried out. Monitoring of discharge changes
with time at the altered sites and in the receiving streams
must be an integral part of the abatement program. Routine
maintenance at the controlled sources is also essential.
Easements to or out-right purchase of land may be necessary
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to obtain control over
pollutant sources on private property. Institutional changes
also may need to be sought to enable the state government to
achieve site control by the expenditure of public monies on
private property. The acquisition of mineral rights in the
area of source abatement projects may be necessary to prevent
future mining activity from destroying the physical controls.
It is further recommended that, in all phases of the described
abatement program, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania seek technical
and financial assistance from all appropriate agencies of the
Federal government.
All conclusions, recommendations, and estimates contained in
this document are subject to refinement as the programs of the EPA
and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania progress.
-------
BACKGROUND
Streams draining the coal fields of the Kiskiminetas River
have probably been acidic in nature from the time of the opening
of the first mines and they remain so at the present time. A re-
port from the 1930's refers to the acid stream conditions in both
the Kiskiminetas River as well as in major tributaries to the
River (l). The initial documentation of the mine drainage prob-
lem in this basin is not known; however, it has existed for per-
haps nearly a century,
In the past kO years, a number of published and unpublished
reports have described the acid stream conditions in the Kiski-
minetas River. However, none of these reports were detailed or
comprehensive studies of the problem.
During 1966, the Wheeling Field Office of the Environmental
Protection Agency in Wheeling, West Virginia conducted a stream
water quality survey of the upper Ohio River as part of the overall
Appalachian Water Resources Survey (2). In the Kiskiminetas River
basin, a network of 26 stream sampling stations was established for
repetitive sampling and flow measurement during the 1966 field season.
The survey produced quantitative data on mine drainage problem areas
in the basin. The survey findings are discussed in the following
section and presented in Appendix A. The locations of the 1966
water quality sampling points are shown on Figure 1.
10
-------
-------
STREAM WATER QUALITY - SURVEY FINDINGS, 1966
The Kiskiminetas River enters the Allegheny River 30 miles
above Pittsburgh. During the survey, the Kiskiminetas River dis-
charged a massive average net acid load of ^9^- tons per day as
measured at Vandergrift (Sta. 56?). The pH of the river ranged
from 3.0 to 3.6 and the alkalinity was depleted throughout the
survey. Long term water quality records show that the river
discharges an average of 329 tons per day of acidity to the
Allegheny River (3).
Within the Kiskiminetas •watershed, there are about ^85 miles
of streams polluted by mine drainage. Many streams are acid even
in the upper headwater areas of Somerset and Cambria Counties.
The Little Conemaugh River above Johnstown (Sta. 581) carried a
net acid load of 25 tons per day.
Stony Creek, which enters the Conemaugh River at Johnstown,
drains U66 square miles and contains more than 100 miles of acid
streams. The principal tributaries of Stony Creek are polluted
by mine drainage. Shade Creek carried a net acid load of 13 tons
per day (Sta k^b). Additional acid loads discharged to the Conemaugh
River between Johnstown and Seward, Pennsylvania raised the average
net acid load in the river to 86 tons per day (Sta. 579)•
12
-------
Blacklick Creek and many of its tributaries are acid over
their entire length. The Blacklick watershed contains over 100
miles of mine drainage polluted streams. The pH at the mouth of
Blacklick Creek ranged from 2.5 to 2.9 and the total acidity con-
centration from ^52 to 897 mg/1 (Sta. 573). The net acid load of
208 tons/day discharged from Blacklick Creek is h2 percent of the
net acid load discharged by the Kiskiminetas River.
A net acid load of 88 tons per day was measured on the North
Branch Blacklick Creek at White Mill Crossing in Cambria County
(Sta. 577). Although the watershed above this point represents
only Ik percent of the Blacklick Creek watershed, Ul percent of
the total net acid load of Blacklick Creek was measured here.
The load at this station amounts to 18 percent of that measured
in .the Kiskiminetas at Vandergrift. Two Lick Creek discharged a
net acid load of 38 tons per day to Blacklick Creek (Sta. 571*).
The Conemaugh River below Blairsville (Sta. 575) carried a
net acid load of 397 tons per day, contained no alkalinity, and
exhibited a pH range of 2.9 to 3.3. Continuing downstream, the
Kiskiminetas River is formed where the Conemaugh River and Loyal-
hanna Creek converge just above the Armstrong-Indiana County Line.
Loyalhanna Creek is an acid stream over much of its length and con-
tributed a net acid load of 57 tons per day. The pH ranged from
3.3 to U.7 and the alkalinity was completely depleted (Sta. 570).
From the origin of the Kiskiminetas River at Saltsburg to its
mouth, there are several small acid contributing tributaries. The
largest of these is Blacklegs Creek which contained a net acid load
•13
-------
at its mouth of five tons per day (Sta. 569).
During the 1966 water quality survey, the Kiskiminetas River
at Vandergrift (Sta. 567) contained an average manganese concentra-
tion of 23.2 mg/1. High average manganese concentrations were
found at Station 579 (29.8 mg/l) and Station 567 (23.2 mg/1) in
the Conemaugh and Kiskiminetas River below Johnstown. Manganese
concentrations in tributaries to the Conemaugh-Kiskiminetas main-
stem averaged about one-tenth of the mainstem concentrations. The
higher manganese levels in the mainstem below Johnstown are probably
due to discharges from the steel industry.
The Conemaugh-Kiskiminetas River is an acid stream over its
entire length and the river system is grossly polluted by coal
mine drainage. Acid, sterile streams in this watershed are the
rule and not the exception.
Although the Allegheny River possessed adequate dilution and
neutralizing capability to assimilate mine drainage water received
above the mouth of the Kiskiminetas River, the water quality is
significantly degraded below this point. The Allegheny River at
Natrona, Pennsylvania carried an average net acid load of 2^5 tons
per day and had a pH range of k.O to 6.8. The total acidity con-
centration exceeded the alkalinity concentration during two thirds
of the survey period. However, the acidity concentration was gen-
erally below 30 rag/1.
A one-year study during 1965-1966 conducted by the University
of Pittsburgh for the Wheeling Field Office of The Environmental
1U
-------
Protection Agency measured an average net acid load of 3&t tons per
day discharged from the Kiskiminetas River and a net alkalinity load
of U01 tons per day from the Allegheny River at Pittsburgh (h).
Water quality records show that acid conditions in the lower
Allegheny River are particularly acute during periods of low flow
when the percentage contribution of flow to the mainstem by the
Kiskirainetas is greater than normal. When roughly 30 percent of
the flow in the Allegheny is from the Kiskiminetas River, fish kills
are expected. One million fish were killed in the Allegheny River
below the Kiskirainetas due to acid conditions during the period
August 19-23, 1966.
15
-------
INTRODUCTION
In the spring of 196?» several discussions were held between
personnel of the Wheeling Field Office, Environmental Protection
Agency, Wheeling, West Virginia, and personnel of the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources (DER). These discussions
developed into a cooperative State-Federal project to locate and
quantify all significant sources of coal mine drainage in the
principal problem areas of the Allegheny River basin. The first
cooperative effort was developed in the Clarion River basin. The
field work portion of this initial study was completed in the fall
of 1967. In the spring of 1968, it was decided to continue the
cooperative field effort in the Kiskiminetas River basin. Based
on the available water quality data and the widespread severity of
the mine drainage problem, it was decided to extend the field survey
over the entire 1,892 square mile drainage area of the Kiskiminetas
River.
For the purpose of aiding the field survey crews as well as
aiding in the initial field reports, the Kiskiminetas River basin
was delineated into seven separate sub-basin drainage areas. The
seven sub-basin areas are shown on Figure 1. Pertinent data re-
garding these areas is shown below:
MINE DRAINAGE SURVEY AREAS
KISKIMINETAS RIVER BASIN
Survey Area Drainage Area (sq. miles)
Kiskiminetas River - mainstem and tributaries 216
Loyalhanna Creek • 300
16
-------
Drainage Area
Survey Area (sq. miles)
Conemaugh River - mainstem and minor tributaries 310
Blacklick Creek 222
Two Lick Creek 190
Little Conemaugh River 188
Stony Creek
TOTAL 1,892
Four two-man crews performed the field work during the study.
Due to other work commitments, there were a few periods when the
total field force was not in operation. However, all four field
crews were in operation during most of the study period. The study
began during the second week of April, 1968 and was completed during
October 1968.
Field crew personnel were supplied on an equal basis by the
EPA and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, i. e. four men each. The
EPA personnel were all from the Wheeling Field Office, Wheeling,
West Virginia. The Pennsylvania personnel were all from the Depart-
ment of Environmental Resources Offices at Pittsburgh, Meadville,
Lewistown, Williamsport, Kingston, and West Reading. Mine discharges
were numbered consecutively by watershed as encountered. Field per-
sonnel prepared an inventory sheet for each sample taken describing
the conditions found. Color photographs were taken to augment the
descriptions of certain mine discharges.
Samples were taken for laboratory analysis of each mine dis-
charge and selected surface streams. Conductivity, pH determinations
and a flow measurement were made at the time of each sample collec-
tion. The samples were analyzed by laboratory facilities in
•17
-------
the Wheeling Field Office for the additional parameters of total
acidity, alkalinity, hardness, sulfate, total iron, manganese and
aluminum. Approximately 950 samples were analyzed during the six-
month intensive sampling period.
During the past several years, Pennsylvania has shown an in-
creasing awareness of stream pollution resulting from the discharge
of both active and abandoned coal mines. In 1965* Pennsylvania
amended the existing Clean Streams Law for pollution control from
active mines. In 196?, a Land and Water Conservation and Reclama-
tion Bond Issue of 500 million dollars was approved. This bond
issue allocated 150 million dollars for the abatement of mine
drainage pollution from abandoned mines (5). The bond issue money
is budgeted over a ten year period under the direction of the De-
partment of Environmental Resources. In conjunction with the Clean
Streams Law, the Commonwealth is in the position to direct pollution
abatement activities toward the abandoned mine problem and also in
the position to enforce effluent standards on the discharges emanat-
ing from active mines.
Present Commonwealth of Pennsylvania mine drainage pollution
control regulatory authority is adequate to prevent additional
stream quality degradation due to iron and acidity from active or
future mining activities. Stream pollution resulting from operating
coal mines in the Kiskiminetas River basin were quite significant
during the period of survey. However, the amount of mine drainage
pollution emanating from active operations has been significantly
18
-------
reduced by the installation of treatment facilities. It is the
residual problem of drainage from abandoned mines that will re-
quire virtually all of the emphasis of any program of drainage
abatement in the Kiskiminetas River basin.
The Commonwealth has developed their abandoned mine drainage
program in four phases (6). The initial field inventory and docu-
mentation of existing pollution sources, as presented in this re-
port, completes the Phase I (Pollution Source Inventory) portion
of this program. Phase II (Engineering Studies and Plans) essen-
tially incorporates the recommendations outlined in items 2, 3> and
k as listed in an earlier section of this document. Phase III of
this program includes construction while Phase TV is concerned with
operation and maintenance of the physical structure.
As mentioned above, the mine drainage source inventory conduc-
ted during the cooperative study completes the Phase I portion of
the abatement schedule outlined above. Since completion of the
field inventory, the Commonwealth has initiated preliminary engi-
neering studies (Phase n) and/or on a limited basis, construction
(Phase III) in several of the inventoried Kiskiminetas River water-
sheds. These areas include Two Lick Creek, Loyalhanna Creek, Stony
Creek, and Blacklegs Creek.
In preparation of the Kiskiminetas River mine drainage report,
an attempt was made to update existing information on active mines
in the basin. Contact was made with the appropriate Regional Office
of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources relative
19
-------
to the active underground mine* in their respective regions. This
information, as supplied by these offices at the time of request,
has been included in the sub-basin reports. No attempt was made
to include active nines which have been developed since 1968. As
a result of the nature of such mining, no attempt was made to up-
date information concerning surface mines which were active at the
time of survey.
20
-------
rURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this report is to provide basic data concerning
sources of coal mine drainage in critical problem areas of the Kis-
kiminetas River basin. Information regarding the location, physical
characteristics, and quantity and quality of point sources is req-
uisite to the development of a program to reduce or eliminate the
deleterious water quality affects of mine drainage.
The objectives of this report are to:
1. Describe the significance and impact of water quality
impairment by coal mine drainage in the Kiskiminetas
River basin.
2. Identify and characterize the tributary watersheds
contributing significant amounts of acidity and re-
lated constituents to the Kiskiminetas River,
3. Relate mine drainage contributions of sub-watersheds
to the mainstem of the receiving stream.
h. Inventory the sources of coal mine drainage, by
watershed, in terms of salient characteristics
and quantity and quality of discharge.
5. Isolate and identify the principal pollution sources
in each watershed unit studied.
6. Outline essential steps in a mine drainage abatement
program.
Descriptions of seven inventoried watersheds of the Kiskimine-
tas River basin are contained in the following sections of this
21
-------
document. There are seven separate sections, one pertaining to
each watershed. Each section contains its own summary and con-
clusions, maps, water quality data, and related mine drainage
information. Analyses for the individual discharging mine sites
are shown in the appendices. A separate appendix is included
for each of the individual watershed study areas.
Abating pollution from inactive mines is a task the cost
and success of which are difficult to predict at this time with
reasonable accuracy. The difficulty stems from the fact that
there is little experience with watershed-scale abatement projects
upon which to base estimates.
It is the general conclusion of this report that the develop-
ment of meaningful cost estimates for the abatement of mine drainage
pollution in the Kiskiminetas River basin is sufficiently complex to
warrant a separate engineering-economic study. No attempt has been
made to suggest order-of-magnitude cost estimates for the study area.
A preliminary and relatively short-term survey, such as reported
herein, is qualitative but results in limited quantitative conclusions.
The chemical loadings of mine drainage parameters measured in the mine
discharges and the pollutional effects of these loadings measured in
the receiving streams are representative of the time of survey. These
loading figures do not reflect permanent or established conditions and
will exhibit widely varying rates at different periods of hydrologic
conditions. The acquired data is significant in that it provides a
preliminary basis for further studies. The recommendations leading
to an action program of mine drainage pollution abatement stated in
this document are based upon this data.
22
-------
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER
The eastern part of the Kiskiminetas River basin has a dis-
tinctive series of northeast-trending anticlinal ridges, which
are the chief physiographic features. Toward the center or axis
of these major structures, the rocks are progressively older.
The axial centers are principally rocks of the Pocono Formation
which are flanked on both the east and west by succeedingly
younger rocks of the Mauch Chunk, Pottsvilie, Allegheny, and
Conemaugh Formations. Along the axial centers of major syncli-
nal structures in the western part of the basin, the Monongahela
Formation forms the land surface.
Principal rock types of these water-bearing rock units are
sandstone conglomerate, shale, minor beds of limestone, and a few
bituminous coal beds of commercial importance. In general, the
thick conglomeratic sandstones are the best sources of ground water.
The history of development of ground water supplies shows that val-
leys are hydrologically more favorable than hilltops for satisfactory
wells.
Adequate supplies of ground water are available in the basin to
meet most of the needs for the present and the forseeable future.
Development of ground water has not been intense and many areas are
practically untapped. The quantity of ground water withdrawn is
actually only a fraction of the total available supply. Principal
developments for communities and industries have been in the extensive
.23
-------
permeable sandstone aquifers that crop out or that lie within 300
to hOO feet of the land surface. The most favorable areas for
development of relatively large ground water supplies are under-
lain by massive coarse-grained conglomeratic sandstones of the
Allegheny, Pottsville, and Pocono Formations. These rocks, which
underlie somewhat less than half the basin area, yield large
quantities of fresh ground water of good quality. Yields of wells
range from 50 to as much as 600 gallons per minute (gpm).
The rocks of the Monongahela Formation do not yield large
quantities of ground water to wells. However, these aquifers are
developed because they are the only practical source of water sup-
ply for rural residents, dairy farms, and business firms not served
by central public supply systems. Yields of wells tapping these
rocks range from 1 to 20 gpm.
More than half the basin is underlain by rocks of the Conemaugh
Formation, which is an important source of ground water. Yields of
20 to 150 gallons per minute are common for individual wells devel-
oped in favorable hydrogeologic areas.
Figure 2 is a small scale generalized map showing the poten-
tial ground water resources, based on information that is presently
available. However, major ground water developments for communities
and industries at specific sites usually require detailed studies
and exploratory drilling to fully define the hydrologic character-
istics of the water-bearing rocks. In the first stages of devel-
oping large supplies, all wells must be considered as test wells
-------
until their ultimate capacity is established by controlled pumping
tests.
In general, the chemical quality of the ground water in the
basin is much better than the chemical quality of the streams.
The ground water is, with some exceptions, satisfactory for most
ordinary uses with little or no treatment or disinfection. In
some places, however, the iron content and hardness is high enough
to require some treatment in both private and public supplies.
Chloride content is usually low in shallow aquifers, but at depths
of several hundred feet below the major streams chloride content
can be quite high in some areas.
In certain localities, ground water of better chemical quality
can be obtained by drilling to an alternate aquifer, but detailed
study of local geologic conditions certainly is necessary to deter-
mine the most favorable aquifers and well development procedures.
Available water-treatment methods can alleviate most of the ground
water quality problems.
Coal mining can affect the local occurrence of ground water,
but the total basinwide effect is apparently negligible. Mined
areas act as additional drainageways for the discharge of ground
water and, in a few local places, apparently have caused a lowering
of water levels. The effects of mining on the chemical quality of
the ground water apparently does not extend much beyond the immedi-
ate area of mining activities.
-------
-------
COAL MINING
The counties comprising the Kiskiminetas River basin have
been among the most significant coal producing areas in the Com-
monwealth. During 1968, these Counties, Armstrong, Cambria,
Indiana, Somerset, and Westmoreland produced 28 million tons of
soft coal. The greatest production was nearly eight million tons
in Cambria County while Westmoreland County produced the least
with three million tons (7).
Armstrong County
Armstrong County has been a significant coal producing area
for many years. There are about twenty coal beds in Armstrong
County. During 1968, production was reported from six major seams.
These included Middle and Upper Kittanning, Lower and Upper Free-
port, Mahoning, and the Pittsburgh Coal seams. Coal production
totalled 6.6 million tons with deep mine production equalling
about two-thirds of the total production.
Coal reserves in Armstrong County are contained principally
in two seams. These are the Upper Freeport and Lower Kittanning.
Reserves contained in beds of less economic significance include
the Pittsburgh, Lower Freeport, Upper and Middle Kittanning, and
Clarion seams. In total, it has been estimated that Armstrong
County contains approximately 500 million tons of recoverable coal
reserves. This reserve is contained in beds 28 inches or more
thick (8).
27
-------
Cambria County
There are 2U recognizable coal beds in Cambria County. The
County is, and has been in the past, one of the largest coal pro-
ducing areas in the state. The Lower Kittanning coal is probably
the most persistent bed in the county. Many of the large active
deep mines in Cambria County are in the Lower Kittanning seam.
Other important coal seams in the county include the Upper Kittan-
ning, Lower Freeport, and Upper Freeport. During 1968, production
was also reported in the Middle Kittanning and Brookville seams.
It has been estimated that this county contains more than 800 million
tons of recoverable coal reserves in beds 28 inches or more thick (9).
Indiana County
During I960, production was reported from five coal beds in
Indiana County. These beds included Lower and Upper Kittanning,
Lower and Upper Freeport, and the Pittsburgh coals. The Lower
Kittanning and Upper Freeport seams are the most economically im-
portant. In 1968, county production totalled 6.6 million tons.
Surface mining methods contributed only about 0.8 million tons of
this figure.
Major coal reserves in Indiana County are contained in eight
seams. However, the Lower Kittanning and Lower and Upper Freeport
seams are the most significant and contain the major portion of the
reserve. Recoverable reserves in beds 28 inches and more thick are
estimated at 900 million tons (10).
28
-------
Somerset County
Production was reported from ten coal seams in Somerset
County during 1968. These included Clarion, Lower, Middle and
Upper RLttanning, Lower and Upper Freeport, Brush Creek, Pitts-
burgh, Redstone, and the Sewickley coal beds. The Upper and
Lower Kittanning seams are among the most important. In 1968>
county production totalled about four million tons. Surface
raining methods accounted for about 60 percent of the total pro-
duction.
Recoverable coal reserves in Somerset County are contained
in the following seams: Upper Kittanning, Lower Kittanning, Upper
Freeport, Lower Freeport, Middle Kittanning, Clarion, Pittsburgh
and Redstone. The order of listing also designates the order of
importance assigned to these seams. The Pittsburgh and Redstone
contain only a very minor portion of the total reserve. Recover-
able reserves 28 inches or more thick in Somerset County are esti-
mated at 700 million tons. (11)
Westmoreland County
There are sixteen coal beds of minable thickness in Westmore-
land County. In 1968, production was reported in the Lower and
Upper Freeport, Pittsburgh, and Redstone coal seams. In 1968,
county production totalled about three million tons. Surface
mining methods produced less than one-quarter million tons.
From the standpoint of reserves, there are two major coal
beds in Westmoreland County. These are the Pittsburgh and Upper
.29
-------
Freeport. The Waynesburg, Redstone, Lower Freeport, and Lower
Kittanning are of only minor importance. In beds 28 inches and
more thick, it is estimated that the recoverable coal reserve in
Westmoreland County is in excess of 825 million tons (12).
Total recoverable coal reserves in the five county area com-
prising the Kiskiminetas River basin are estimated in excess of
3,700 million tons. A substantial portion of this reserve is
located outside the basin boundary. However, that portion of
the reserve within the Kiskiminetas River drainage area is more
than adequate to insure steady and continued mining for many years.
-------
KISKIMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
31
-------
KISKIMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM
AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
SUWARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The main stem Kiskiminetas River and its minor tributaries
drain an area of 216 square miles. The entire length of the Kis-
kiminetas River between its formation at Saltsburg to its confluence
with the Allegheny River at Schenley, Pennsylvania is seriously pol-
luted as a result of coal mine discharges. This water quality deg-
radation results from discharges within the drainage boundary as
well as from massive amounts of mine drainage inflow contributed
by Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River.
2. A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,U?5 acres
of surface mined area were investigated in the study area. Dis-
charges from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 1,008 gpm
and totalled nearly 6.k million gallons per day (mgd). The total
net acid load discharged by the 89 sources was 57,880 Ib/day.
3. At the time of the survey, active operations were limited to
two drift mines. At the time of sampling, one of the active mines
contributed an acid load of 3,3^0 Ib/day (Mine No. 5871). However,
treatment facilities have since been installed at this mine and it
is reported that the treatment facility operates within the standards
imposed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The second mine was not
operating at inspection and at that time contributed only a negligible
discharge.
32
-------
Refuse piles and abandoned drift mines were the major sources of
pollution in the study area. These sources contributed about 85 per-
cent of the total net acid load discharged by all sources in the
vatershed.
k. A total of 17 principal sources of mine drainage discharge vere
located in the study area. These sources discharged a total net acid
load of 46,613 lb/day. This represents about 8l percent of the acid
load discharged by all sources In the vatershed.
DESCTOPTICK OF AREA
The Kiskiminetas River is formed by the confluence of the Cone-
maugh River and Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg, Pennsylvania. From
this point the liver flows generally northwest through the communities
of Apollo, Vandergrlft, and Leechburg, to its confluence with the
Allegheny River at Schenley. The river is approximately 27 miles
in length and drains an area of 216 square miles.
Beaver Run and Blacklegs Creek with drainage areas of 55
square miles and l»-5 square miles respectively, are the principal
tributaries to the main stem Kiskiminetas River.
STREAM WATBl QUALITY
Due to the grossly polluted acid condition of both Loyalhanna
Creek and the Conemaugh River, the Kiskiminetas River exhibits
similar water quality conditions over its entire length. Particularly
33
-------
in the Saltsburg area, the river carries the characteristic iron
discoloration of mine drainage waters. The river bed and high water
levels are heavily stained and coated with precipitated iron compounds.
Alkaline tributary inflow entering the river below Saltsburg is
immediately assimilated with no noticeable water quality improvement
in the main stem.
During the course of the field study several stream locations
were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 3, Figure 3)- These
stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine
drainage. A summary of the stream data is presented in Table U.
The water quality data collected below the Conemaugh and Loyalhanna
Reservoirs are also included in this data summary. This data reflects
the background water quality of the tributaries which form the
Kiskiminetas River.
All but one of the above streams are affected by mine drainage
discharges to some degree. Roaring Run is the one exception. Although
there are extensive underground mining operations in the immediate
area of Roaring Run, there are no significant mine effluents discharged
directly to the stream. However, Roaring Run is affected and similar
in appearance to the many mine drainage degraded streams in the
surrounding vicinity. Near its lower reach the tributary is in con-
tinual contact with a coal seam which outcrops in the stream bed. From
this point to its confluence with the Kiskiminetas River the stream
is highly discolored.
-------
TABLE
Stream Water Quality Sampling Stations
Kiskiminetas River, Main Stem and Minor Tributaries
Station No.
Sampling Period
Stream
Location
5619
5292
5617
5206
5618
5626
5627
5628
5629
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968
July, Oct, Nov, 1968
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968
May, June, 1971
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968
Nov, Dec, 1968
Nov, Dec, 1968
Nov, Dec, 1968
Nov, Dec, 1968
Conemaugh River
Loyalhanna Creek
Wo1ford Run
Blacklegs Creek
Sulphur Run
Roaring Run
Beaver Run
Kiskiminetas River
Kiskiminetas River
USGS gage below reservoir
USGS gage below reservoir
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
Vandergrift, Pa.
Near mouth
35
-------
luminum
1 Ib/dav
^
>
a T
« -».
C A
Cfl iH
9
$?
8
>
85
H ^
CD
4J rH
H §
ai t:
w *^
nJ xi
•H fl)
•o -o
2s
cd <->
4J *^>
O C
H E
o
r*. fv ro
m m
m r^ m
r^ r^ o
CM r-l CM
CM 00 CO
r-4 t-t
ON *J CO
r-l CO «-t
r^. co o
rH CT\ r^-
co in o
1-4 r- a*
•-I CM O
I^H >J QO
t-4 i-l
§o o
CM O
CTs O
CM 00
m r-t oo
.-i i-i
O o m
O r-l 00
m CM t-t
^o o o
•d- tn
•3- oo
00 00
55553
O CO *N
CM i-f <
t-l f-t 1-*
o
rH
^ r r
in
VO 00 00
ON ^£> r*
O CM v£>
m CM
CM
*J CO CO
ro t^ r*
in co r-i
m co
CM
CM -^ r»
m •<»• co
O CM O>
in in o>
<^ r-
CM
O in CM
m -sfr a\
O CO O
in o *tf
t-4 CM CO
^
^r- in
^S oTcs'
<* CM vO
i-T ^
o o >*
o -* o
<0
t-i o m
i-H CO t-4
CM
ON
CM ~ -
m
in m r-i
O — i o
^ o o
t-l CM
rv o o
vO CM r-l
*» m co
-tf m
r^ \o o\
m o\ CM
r- in c**
O fi-Jb
rH op O
rv ofc
vo m
o o
m o
CO -st
VO v*
CM -3"
o\ p-4
00 I O
CM 1 ix.
l>- 1 ON
r-t 1 CM
8 ! a
a : °°
CO ON i-
01 *
C£^
in vo m
ro m vo
rH f^
r*. co co
m CM CM
CO
CM r^ vo
m ON o
rH * CM
CM
•^ m CM
VO rH rH
CM f-l rH
O ro m
rH ON in
CM CO CO
CM
CM CM \O
vo m o
CM rH ,-1
§o o
CM£§
i-4
co m r>-
Im IA ON
00 O 00
co in h»
CO ^0
Soo oo
vO vO
rH O -tf
CM
vO
CM
vO= =
in
U-l O rH
CO ON CM
•-H ro vo
m -tf co
ON co CM
i-t en
o oo r-.
\o r* ON
<}• ON
m oo 0
.-i ^
O 1 O
00 1 *£>
00 ' OO
2 S3
0 0
rH CO
m i m
oo i m
in i CM
i
*tf VO
.* vO ON
SCM^.
^vO -H
1
1
1
0 1 0
r- i ON
m i CM
t
1 ' i
i i i
! I 1
i i i
i i i
i i t
i i i
•^ vo r^
CO ON ON
CM
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
ITi vO O
CM O CO
-------
FiGu^t 3
KISKMNtTAS fl V£R MA NS~!tM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
-------
The U5 square mile drainage area of Blacklegs Creek was not
included during the 1968 field inventory of the Kiskiminetaa River
basin. There were several reasons for its exclusion. During 1966
the Blacklegs Creek drainage area was selected as an area represent-
ative of coal mine drainage problems in the Allegheny River basin.
As a result of this selection, a field investigation in this area
was conducted during the summer of 1966. During the 1968 coopera-
tive study, it was decided that a reinvestigation of Blacklegs
Creek would be conducted only if sufficient time was available.
Since this was not the case, the area was deleted from study. In
preparation of this report, it was decided that a limited reinvesti-
gation should be conducted in the Blacklegs Creek drainage area. In
May of 1971, a three-day survey was performed in order to determine
the current status of coal mine operations on Blacklegs Creek. At
this time, it was determined that the stream water quality, number
and type of discharging mines, active mines, etc., had not been
significantly altered since the 1966 study. As a result, except
where noted in the following text, the Blacklegs Creek mine drain-
age data reflects the conditions as measured during 1966.
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
Approximately 150 mining sites and an estimated 1,1*75 acres of
strip mined area were investigated in this study. Samples for chemical
analysis were collected from 89 sources discharging at the time of the
38
-------
•survey. The total effluent volume from all sources was ^,U39
or 6.U million gallons per day (mgd). The total net acid load dis-
charged to the main stem Kiskiminetas River and its tributaries was
57,880 Ib/day.
A description of the mine drainage sources follows. All mine
site locations inventoried in this area are shown in Figure k.
Main Stem - Unnamed tributaries below Saltsburg
Approximately 0.9 mile below the formation of the Kiskiminetas
River, several small unnamed tributaries enter the main stem. Seven
underground and four surface mines were inventoried on these small
tributaries. Discharges were located at three of these sites. Mine
No. 5537 was an inactive drift mine located near the headwaters of
one tributary. This mine contributed a 12 gpm discharge which carried
an acid load of 399 Ib/day. The second discharge (Mine No. 5539) was
located at the base of a highwall in a strip mined area. It appeared
that this area may have been drift mined prior to the surface opera-
tion. The acid load was 62 Ib/day. A U5 gpm effluent was sampled
at Mine No. 5538, an abandoned drift mine. The acid load was 508 Ib/day.
Blacklegs Creek
Only a limited number of surface mines were investigated along
the north side of Blacklegs Creek below Big Run. These surface mines,
as well as several underground mine openings, were dry.
39
-------
Three discharges on Big Run are responsible for the major
portion of the total acid mine drainage load discharged in the Black-
legs Creek watershed. These sources include Mine No.'s 6oU, 605 and
5207.
Mine No. 604 is located adjacent to the gravel road which runs
along Big Run. The actual discharge point is below the road bed
almost at stream level. At road level only a slight hillside depres-
sion indicates the possible presence of the old drift opening. The
measured effluent was 32^ gpm which carried an acid load of 1,750
Ib/day.
Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of Mine No. 604 a second major
source of mine acid discharge was located on a small unnamed tributary
to Big Run. This was Mine No. 5207. This site was not located during
the initial 1966 survey and was found and sampled for the first time
in May 1971- It was not determined if this site represents a mine
opening or a breakout point from an underground mine located elsewhere
in the general area. The 310 gpm effluent carried an acid load of
1,618 Ib/day.
Mine No. 605 is the third major source of mine drainage discharge
on Big Run. The measured effluent was 675 gpm and carried an acid
load of 3,^3 Ib/day. An additional acid load of ^50 Ib/day was
received by Big Run from Mine No. 606 located almost directly across
from Mine No. 605.
Extensive mine operations were at one time operative near the
1.0
-------
community of Iselin cm Harpers Run. All that presently remains
are large gob piles and several miles of unreclaimed contour surface
mines. During 1966 two minor sources of acid discharge were collected
from one of the mine refuse dumps. In the later (1971) reinvestigation
of the area these two sources were not located. The failure to relocate
these sources could be a hydrologic function but more likely these two
effluents may have been abated by an Operation Scarlift program which
has occured during the five year interval. The Scarlift program was
directed toward extinguishment of a fire burning in one of the refuse
dumps. The subsequent covering of portions of the pile may have
eliminated the discharges.
The headwater area of Whiskey Run has been extensively mined. A
total of 21 samples were collected, 14 of which were discharging at
the time of inspection. Mine No. 631 was the only significant source
of acid discharge located in the Whiskey Run drainage area. This mine
is one of several openings in the immediate area; however, the others
were dry. The 60 gpm effluent from Mine No. 631 carried an acid load
of 396 lb/day.
The last significant mine discharge in the Blacklegs Creek area
was located on an unnamed tributary near the headwaters of the stream.
At this site (Mine No. 6U6) an effluent of 1,008 gpm was discharged
to the receiving tributary. The alkalinity concentration of the
effluent was 267 mg/1 with a resultant alkaline load of 3,330 lb/day.
Although alkaline, the discharge is grossly discolored and as a result
several miles of downstream Blacklegs Creek are similarly discolored.
-------
Sulphur Run
The 1,8 square mile drainage area of Sulphur Run Is polluted by
mine drainage over much of its length. Several very old underground
mines have been located on the tributary. Six surface mines were
also inspected. Four point source discharges were located. Bach of
the discharge points appear to represent old mine openings) however,
the surface mines may have created additional openings when they
Intersected the mine voids. A considerable amount of mine refuse is
scattered about the area and is in contact with several hundred yards
of main stem Sulphur Run. The acid load discharged by the four sources
totalled 503 lb/day (Mine No.'s 5878, 5&79, 5880; and 5881). One
active strip mine was investigated; however, it was dry.
Stream sampling at the mouth of Sulphur Run (Station No. 5618)
indicated acid load values ranging from 1,200 lb/day to 1,600 lb/day
(Table 3). It is readily apparent that the stream carried acid loads
far in excess of the load values contributed by the mine discharges.
This is due to the numerous small seepage areas in the watershed which
were not measureable and therefore not directly quantifiable.
Long Run
This tributary drains an eight mile area north of Avonmore on
the opposite side of the river. A few abandoned surface and underground
mines as well as one active underground mine were inventoried on
this tributary. The surface nines in the area are associated with snail
-------
drift mines. Two of these abandoned combination mines were discharging
and contributed a total acid load of 29 Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5873,587^)-
The active David mine of Canterbury Coal Company was located north
of Maysville. At the time of Inspection a ^00 gpm discharge vas sampled.
The acid load carried by this effluent vas 3.3^0 Ib/day. However, treat-
ment facilities were nearly complete on the sampling date. At the pre-
sent time these facilities are in operation. The treatment supplied is
generally adequate; however, the discharge rate has occasionally
exceeded the capacity of the treatment facility. As a result the final
effluent has not always met effluent standards required by Pennsylvania
for active mine discharges. It has been reported that the company has
applied for a new permit for an additional borehole and treatment
facility to alleviate the present overload.
Another active drift mine was located along the bank of the
Kiskiminetas River approximately 0.5 mile below the confluence of
Long Run. The mine was not operating at the time of inspection and there
was no discharge from the opening at this site. This mine was under
ownership by the Alt«ire Brothers Coal Company.
Wolford Run
Cn the opposite bank of the river, Wolford Run was the next down-
stream tributary affected by mine drainage discharges. The tributary
drains 9-8 square miles and enters the river near the community of
Sallna. The stream is degraded in the headwater area and remains so
along its entire downstream length.
-------
Five mine discharges were sampled in the head-water area. These
discharges resulted from a combination of both surface and underground
mine operations. The total discharge was 53 gpm and the acid load was
1,119 Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5530, 5531, 5532, 5533, 5531*)- Along the
mid-reach of the stream a series of combination surface and underground
mines discharged high acid loads. Mine No.'s 5535, 5536, and 5537
contributed an acid load of nearly 1,700 Ib/day. There were no
additional mine effluents draining to Volford Run. However, large mine
refuse areas near Salina contributed significant amounts of acidity
through sub-surface seepage directly to Wolford Run.
During the course of the field study Wolford Run was sampled for
water quality analysis on three occassions (Table 3)- On each occassion
the water quality was highly degraded as a direct result of abandoned
mine discharges. The acid load measured near the mouth of the stream
ranged from 8,000 Ib/day to a maximum of Uo,000 Ib/day.
Two additional discharge points were located in the immediate
area. Mine No.'s 55^0 and 55^1 are located along the bank of the
river just downstream of Salina. Due to their proximity these openings
may have been interconnected with the mine at Salina or may have
served as drainage points for the mine. The combined acid load
carried by these discharges was 369 Ib/day.
Kisklminetas River, malnstem - Brownstown area
Mining operations along both banks of the Klskiminetas River in
the Brownstown area have been extensive. Thirteen mine and mine
-------
associated discharges were located In this area. The cumulative acid
load discharged directly to the river by these sources was nearly
35,000 Ib/day. This represents about tvo-thirdjpof the total acidity
discharged from all sources in the Kiskiminetas River mainstern area.
The Leechburg Mining Company operates an active drift mine at
Brownstown. Although there are numerous abandoned mine discharges in
the immediate area, there were no discharges emanating directly from
this mine. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania regards the mine as dry
and does not attribute any of the surrounding discharges to the active
operation. A very large refuse area is associated with this mine. The
refuse is trucked to the hilltop and scattered over approximately 100
acres. At the time of inventory numerous immeasurable seepage areas
were observed along the bottom edge of this waste pile. In addition
to these seepage areas a total of five discharges were directly
attributed to the pile. The combined acid load contributed by these
discharges was 22,1*35 Ib/day (No.'s 55^, 5588, 5590, 5591, and 5592).
The seepage areas and discharge points have destroyed trees and other
vegetation as the highly mineralized water flows over the hillside to
the Kiskiminetas River some ^00 feet below. One additional sample of
refuse pile drainage was found upstream of the Brownstovn complex. The
acid load was ?8 Ib/day (Ho. 558?).
Six discharges of underground origin were also located in the
Brownstown area It Is difficult to determine the number of drift
mine openings in the area but it appears that there have been several
openings in at least three different coal seams Discharging under-
ground mine sites contributed an acid load in excess of 12,000 Ib/day
(Mine Ho.'s 55^2, 55^3, 5582, 55&3, 5585, 5586, and 5589)- The major
-------
portion of this load was discharged by No.'s 5583 and 5589. Mine
No. 5583 was a partially open drift mine with a flow rate of 80 gpm.
The 195 gpm discharge at No. 5589 emanates from the base of a caved
opening about 60 vertical feet above the river. The opening may have
served as a fanway or drainway for the nearby mines.
Roaring Run
This tributary drains a lU square mile area and joins the
Kiskiminetas River about 1.5 miles downstream of Brownstown. As
mentioned in an earlier section of this document, the water quality
of Roaring Run is degraded due to a coal outcrop in the stream bed
near its lower end. Approximately twelve strip mines and seven
drift openings were located within the drainage area of the tributary.
All but one of these operations were dry. Mine No. 5876 contributed
an acid load of only 5 Ibs/day. The mine appeared to be an active
operation^ however, a local resident stated that the mine had worked
on only a limited basis since it was opened. Two additional drift
mines were in operation on Roaring Run. These were the Casella Bros.
and Swiss Coal Company mines. Both operations were dry. The status
of the Casella mine is not known but it has been reported that the
Swiss mine has been closed since the date of inventory.
Stream sampling and gaging at the mouth of Roaring Run (Station
No. 5626) indicated acid load values ranging from 1,210 Ibs/day to
21,355 Ibs/day. (Table 3). On each occasion, the alkalinity con-
centration was depleted to zero and other mine drainage parameters
including iron, manganese, and aluminum were high.
-------
Beaver Run
Approximately 40 surface mines and 15 underground mine openings
were located vithln the 55 square mile drainage area of Beaver Run.
The tributary joins the Kiskiminetas River Just above the community of
Apollo and on the opposite bank. The large Beaver Run Reservoir Is
located within this sub-basin. The reservoir is for water supply and
pumps via aqueduct to communities outside the Kiskimlnetas River
drainage area.
The first source of mine drainage pollution to enter Beaver Run
was located on an unnamed tributary west of the junction of Routes 66
and 22. In this area a 2 gpm discharge was collected at the base of a
refuse pile. The acid load discharged by this source (No. 560*0 was
only 8 Ib/day.
A series of surface and underground mines were located on the east
bank of Beaver Run and on Porters Run along the eastern finger of the
reservoir. The only mine which contributed a significant discharge was
No. 5550- The source of this discharge was cumulative seepage along
the bottom edge of a strip mine.
The major portion of the discharging mine sites located in the
headwaters of Beaver Run were found along Thorn Run. Thorn Run forms
the western finger of the reservoir. Seven discharging sites were
located. The combined flow was 32 gpm and the acid load totalled
9^9 Ib/day. (Mine No.'s 5605, 5606, 5607, 5612, 5613, 561^, and
5615). Mine No. 5612 contributed nearly one-half of the total acid
load. At this site an old drift portal has been stripped out and
1*7
-------
covered over by the backfill of the surface mine. However, at the base
of the backfill a 5 gpm discharge was located. The acid load was
kkk Ib/day. Additional significant acid loads were discharged by Mine
No.'s 5605 and 560?. Mine 5605 vas a partially open drift mine
(119 Ib/day) and the discharge from Mine No. 5607 resulted from seepage
along the bottom edge of a surface mine (19^ Ib/day). One surface mine
was in operation on Thorn Run during the survey but was dry.
With the exception of the mine described on the headwaters of
Beaver Run and Thorn Run, there were no additional mining operations
on any tributaries draining directly to Beaver Run Reservoir. All
remaining operations were located below the drainage area of the
reservoir.
Immediately below the reservoir an acid load of 3,167 Ib/day was
discharged to Beaver Run by two drainage sources. (Mine No.'s 55^7,
and 55^)- These sources were located within a strip mined area below
the reservoir filtration plant. At least one drift opening and possible
others were located in the base of the hlghwall. The drift mouth was
dry; however, discharges emanating from the base of the highwall were
located on both sides of the portal. The discharge from Mine No. 55*»6
was 110 gpm and carried an acid load of 2,90U Ib/day. The acid load
from No. 55^7 vas 263 Ib/day. The last significant acid load discharged
to Beaver Run was from Mine No. 55^6. At this point cumulative
seepage from a strip mined area discharged an acid load of 259 Ib/day.
Stream sampling near the mouth of Beaver Run (Station No. 5627)
Indicated acid load values ranging from 3,986 Ib/day to 15,628 Ib/day
(Table 3)-
-------
Klskiminetas River, Apollo to mouth
There vere only a limited number of mining operations located along
the remaining downstream length of the Kisklmlnetas River or its minor
tributaries.
One drainage source was located on Sugar Hollow which Joins the
main stem in the community of Apollo. A 5 gpm flow which carried an
acid load of 80 lb/day was located in this area. The discharge
originates in a small gully on the south side of Route 56. There is some
coal refuse scattered about but it was difficult to determine if a mine
was once located here or whether the gully was simply a convenient
dumping location. If the latter is the case, it may be that a small
hillside spring is percolating through the refuse and becoming degraded.
The drainage is then piped under Route 56 and into Sugar Hollow.
The next downstream area affected by mine drainage was Pine Run.
The tributary drains an area of 18 square miles but the mine operations
had been limited to the area just above its mouth. Four discharges
were located along the banks of the tributary. A strip mine extends
several hundred yards along one bank of the tributary. It appears that
this operation has completely destroyed or covered the portal to an
underground mine operation. In addition, numerous intersections with
the underground void were created. There was continous seepage along
the length of the surface mine as well as three major discharge points.
These discharges, No.'s 5608, 5609, and 5610, contributed a combined
acid load of 1,088 lb/day. On the opposite bank of the tributary a
180 gpm effluent was located. The discharge emerged via pipe from the
-------
base of the hill and carried an acid load of 2,808 Ib/day. There
were no obvious indications of mining on this side of Pine Run.
However, the pipe may serve as a drainway to a mine on this side of the
creek which was not located.
Mine No. 589^ was located on the Kiskiminetas River just above
the confluence of Carnahan Run. The discharge emanates from a time-
red and partially open drift mouth about 20 vertical feet above
Route 66. The 60 gpm discharge is piped under the highway and directly
into the river. The acid load was 180 Ib/day. What appears to be a
second opening to this mine was located on the back side of the hill
facing Carnahan Run. This opening was dry. There is a drive-in
theatre at the site of this second opening and it appeared that much
of the parking area was constructed of mine refuse.
Four additional drift mines were located on Carnahan Run and
all were dry. This includes an active drift mine operated by the
Kaskan Coal Company.
Guffy Run was the next downstream tributary affected by mine
drainage. A series of seven drift openings were located, and all but
one of these openings were dry. At Mine No. 5895» a discharge of 162 gpm
was measured. The acid load carried by the effluent was 1*57 Ibs/day.
Across from Guffy Run on the opposite bank of the Kiskiminetas
River a small discharge from an old drift mine was located. This was
Mine No. 5899 in the community of Hyde Park. The acid load was negli-
gible.
Below the community of Leechburg, several mine openings were
-------
located at the Bite of the abandoned Maher Mine. All but one of the
openings were dry. At Mine Ho. 3896 a 72 gpm effluent was located.
The discharge point Is above road level and the effluent cascades
down the steep hillside and Is piped under the highway to the river.
The acid load was 239 Ib/day.
Mine No.'s 5^97 and 5898 were the last downstream sources of mine
drainage discharge inventoried in the study area. Mine Ho. 5897
contributed an acid load of 122 Ib/day and Mine Mo. 5898 contributed
an acid load of 672 Ib/day.
A total of 89 discharging sources and approximately 1,^75 acres
of strip mined area were investigated during this study. The total
measured discharge was ^,^39 gPm or nearly 6.1* mgd. Table 5 presents
an area breakdown in terms of the total flow and total loading (Ib/day)
of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams In the
Kiskiminetas main stem and tributary areas. Table 6 presents a
summary of flow volumes and chemical loadings by source type for the
89 discharging sources inventoried during the study.
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
As shown in Table 6, refuse piles and inactive or abandoned drift
nines are the principal pollution sources within the study area. There
are also a few major pollution sources emanating from the other source
types. It is readily apparent that pollution abatement activities in
the main stem Kiskiminetas River would be of little or no value due to
-------
-------
CO
CU
•H
B Cd
cd 4->
>-i XI
4-J »H
CO S-l
4-1
60
C rl
•H O
> c
•H -H
0) B
0
cu *o
rJ C
cd
n B
CU
CO 4J
60 CO
c c
•H -H
Cd C
0
i — 1 ^
(1) 0)
W) >
cd «H
C "
•H
cd en
Td -U
0)
CD C
C *H
*H G
S *iH
Vr*
en
•H
tJM
3 ">
C rt
•H "rd
g ^
r-l r-l
< ^
CO ^>
0) n!
d -a
60X1
c d
X~>
r-l >
cd c cd
4J O T3
O t-t --.
H H 4?
I— 1
*+^
QJ t>
•U cd
cd T3
"4-1 "--^
•-t X>
3 rH
CO ^>
W *-N
r-J 0) >
cd
IS 4J >
•H cd
r-l TJ 13
0) -H ^
4J 0 XI
0 <; rH
E-l N_<
a)
•H
CU
o
r?
O 0 r--
00 00 ON
M
O i—* ON
CM r- 1 CO
1— 1
O CO r-t
vjO O"N CM
r-< i— 1 in
n
m
r-i o m
CO 1 — VD
CO
CM ON ON
in m oo
m
CM VO 00
CU
0 >
4-1 -rl
C &
co 3
Xi Prf co
C -H rt
p M 13 4J
B- -U tJ 4-i cd 2 A:
r-4 C CO
O C -H
"2 p |ij
^ r- 1
1-1
oo m
CO i — 1
^ (j a)
B w 01 B
cd »H > cd
C W fd d
C a) 3
D PQ P
O
I—I <)•
O r— t 00 O ^D
CO r-l 00 CO
r-l
O\ -s^ r^* r—t £t~)
f-^
r^ v£> ^o o^ o")
r-< r-4 CvJ O\ rO
CO CSJ
V.D rH T-H f^O 00
CM i — ' ^o co
O O O
4J 4J 4J
CO CO CO
3 -H 3 l-l C -H
4J d 4J 04 4J 3
rl rl 5 (2
> aj 4-* a) M a) 60
cSco^odPciJ
C Xj C C
o m CM
in CM
CM in ^o
-*
r— 1 CM CO
CM
«,
rH
VO CM UO
in co ^
o m m
r.
CTl
CO O ON
m o co
m in r-i
•s
I—I
\O ON CO
ON m o
oo CM in
rt
CO
ON vj" VO
CM CO CO
CO
»N
r^ co CM
O ON oo
\o oo ON
r^ oo O
•SAW
CO NO r-l
00 CO O
r-l \D \O
4r\ *\ >S
ro m *-H
1
O <^ »H
CNJ m rH
O O CO
#% n
rH rH
-3" ro t>4
cu o
a) u
^i
U co
CO -H
60 M
a) u
i— i
^1 C -O
U 3 CU
Ci] pq C
ra 60 c
•H C
oa D
r-l 0
co
^D ^*
O CM
r-l
ON v^f
•— I CM
00
CO CO
r-l 00
ON r-l
ON
m
CO r-l
O
rH
CO r-l
r-l
O
4J
CO C
c 5 £
3 rl
C « 4J >
3 cu
CU O) CO
00 rM E -H
•H CO cd X!
PQ -H C 5
*?£
ON
r*^
ON
VD
ON
CO
CM
o
00
00
o
o
o
n
CXJ
OO
in
CM
m
n
m
CM
0
00
oo
A
r---
m
ON
ro
%
v^-
ON
OO
CO
H
g
-------
CO
•rl
(j
rt
0) AJ
I?"2
Jj
CU 4J
U
3 0
0 C
0) 1-4
^
x> -a
i C
vr> co nj
60
U C 6
>J -H OJ
CO *O AJ
ClJ T-l
M OS
•O
09
cu a)
C AJ
S C
1-1
e
•H
CO
•H
3"x T
C tfl
3 xi
.
W M
r
n) X>
4J i-l
O v^
H
^Hy
OJ >.
AJ ni
rt -a'
M-l •»*_
r-l XI
3 -"
to '•-'
OJ /—
i-l CO >
rt OJ rt
AJ d "d
o -d ^.
H U X>
crj r-^
AJ
OJ >»./-<
55 AJ >
fl H
rH H3 "O
AJ 0 XI
O < r-l
H v^
60
r-l tJ /->
2 J §
o u w
H co^
•H
Q
CO
*4-4 Ci)
O CJ
tj
• 3
O O
S3 W
cu
^
H
u
3
O
CO
m co CM m
oo vO co r**
CM m oo
r-l
CO VO CM •*
co m r-i m
CM
in i-4 r~- oo
p^ oo ON r*^
1-1 r-l ON
r-l 4 s*^ 5 ^^ *H ^^ * *W
4J O M Q)
CO O O BJ
co oo
m vo
r-l
ON CM
co
m CM
CO CO
r-l CM
CM O
r-l VO
r-i in
r-. r^
CM in
O O
•d- vo
CO CO
»n o
vO CO
CO CO
CO CO
1
r-l 00
0 0
^ o
ft
1-1
CM r-l
^
•a
CO CO CU
CU *-\ OJ C
C cu CO
S^i gS
4J rt
AJ O AJ XI
M-I n) <*-i crj
•H >^ n) '<^
Q co
CO
0
•^
,_
00
CO
r-
r>k
vo
^
fm
S*>
g
•r
•-1 4J
r-4 U
A) C
3 c
•r
r-l V— •
•H
O
ON
r**.
ON
CM
vO
ON
CO
CM
O
00
00
o
o
0
ft
CM
00
in
CM
m
ft
in
CM
o
00
oo
rJ*
m
ON
CO
^r
*
^^
ON
00
ry\
t I
^J
fH
C?
H
•
cfl
2
rt
-d
(U
C
•H
6
a)
g
rt
CO
OJ
x:
AJ
C
Tl
AJ
•^
*J
T3
OJ
AJ
tfl
U
O
r-l
CO
cu
rj
1
*o
s
o
i-i
ff
4)
n^
c
3
C
rt
cu
u
fl)
*J
3
CO
II
CO
Q)
c
•l-l
s
c
o
•H
AJ
s
•H
X)
o
O
*
-------
tha massive amounts of mine drainage which are received upstream by
Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River. Complete elimination of all
mine drainage problems in this study area vould likely result In an
insignificant water quality improvement in the main stem Kiskimlnetas
River. For this reason pollution abatement activities are Justified only
at such a time when consideration can be given to a total river basin
abatement program which has achieved drainage control on a downstream
priority basis. However, abatement of a single source Q? nine complex
within the study area may also have merit as a demonstration site for
the feasibility study of a particular mine drainage abatement problem.
Based on the initial field survey sampling program it was shown
that 17 of the 89 discharging sites contributed about 8l percent of the
total acid load measured in the study area. The combined acid load of
these sources was in excess of 23 tons per day. Assuming previous or
concurrent abatement of upstream sites, drainage control at these IT
principal sites should result in an improvement of the water quality in
the main stem Kiskiminetas River. Perhaps the most significant reduction
in acid load from any source type could be attained through drainage
control at the large mine refuse area near Brownstown. The total acid
load discharging from areas around the waste dump was nearly 11 tons
per day.
The IT principal sources mentioned above can provide a relative
indication of where the major pollution problems occur in the study area.
In the KiBkiminetas River mainstem and minor tributary area, all sites
which contributed an acid load in excess of 600 Ib/day are considered
-------
as principal sources.
Detailed engineering studies conducted during an entire water year
may necessitate the consideration of additional sources or perhaps
deletion of some sources Initially considered. Until such a time these
17 sources can effectively serve as a first phase of priority In a
program of drainage source abatement.
Hie following is a more detailed description of the IT principal
sources mentioned above. A listing of these sources is shown in
Table 7> The locations of these sources are shown in Figure 5. None
of the mines listed as principal sources were active} however, there were
four drainage sources from the large mine waste dump at Brownstown
which was associated with an active drift mine. At the time of the mine
inventory an acid load exceeding 3;300 Ib/day was discharged from the
active David Mine of Canterbury Coal Company. Due to the installation
of treatment facilities and the plans to further upgrade their facilities,
this mine is not considered as a major pollution source in the study
area.
PRINCIPAL SOURCES
Mine Ho. 6ok
This mine is located adjacent to the gravel road which runs along
Big Run. Facing upstream the discharge point is located on the left
side below the road bed almost at stream level. A slight hillside
depression along the left side of the road may indicate the possible
58
-------
presence of the old drift opening. A negligible amount of mine water
seepage was present at the base of the depression. The measured ef-
fluent was 32^ gpm which carried an acid load of 1,750 Ib/day.
Mine No. 605
The 675 gpm discharge from Mine No. 605 flows from what remains
of an old drift opening or from a drainway for a mine located else-
where in the general area. The discharge has eroded a deep gully in
the surrounding hillside. A network of culverts which once contained
the mine effluent have been completely destroyed. Numerous subsidence
areas were also noted along the hillside directly behind the discharge
point. There were no refuse areas, mine buildings, loading facilities,
or any other features generally associated with a mine site remaining
at this location. The acid load discharged to Big Run was 3,^3 Ib/day.
Mine No. 6U6
This mine site is located in the headwaters area of Blacklegs
Creek on an unnamed tributary. A borehole discharge at this point
contributed an alkaline effluent of 1,008 gpm to the receiving tribu-
tary. Although alkaline in nature (276 mg/l), this effluent is grossly
discolored and, as a result, several miles of downstream Blacklegs
Creek are similarly discolored. The alkaline load was 3,330 Ib/day.
There are very limited indications of mining activity in this area
of the Blacklets Creek watershed. As a result, this borehole may drain
abandoned workings located outside the watershed boundary, possibly from the
59
-------
CO
41
•H
(-1
rt
3
43
i-l
CO 4J
V
U VJ
B §
O *H
ro e
O *T3
00 C
cfl nl
c
f"* *H B
rt 4)
3U 4J
•O C9
M
<• 0) C
H C i-l
•H rt
B E
1— 1 -
rt ^
pf Q)
•H >
s s
•H
M CO
cu rt
4J
V
c
•r-l
E
•H
0)
•H
E
rt
0)
VJ
4J
CO
w
C
1-1
- (
(U
U
a?
rt
•O
^•^
*J I—*
^_l
*o
•H
•^
6j
"
(U E
O U U
•H C^
4-1 « in
•H U O
CO 3 B
(X-tf O
co d P
0 U
U1
"o
§1
rH 01
CO
CM r^ O
ro vD O
r-l
^^
(U
1— 1
o
f*.
(U
0
V™ X
4) cu 41
C C C
•H i-l -i-l
S 2 SS
U U 4J
14^ U-i IM
•H 1-1 rt
14 Jj r*.
Q Q co
*£>
0 0 -*
\o >*o *^
c -a c
» o (2
U-l
60 "-1
•H O
« 3
O O
4J 1 '
^\ r*%
Jj M
oj rt
4J 4J
3 3
43 43
•H C C -H
**! $-1 3 3 M
"J 1^. r-l ON
r-l CO i-1
0000
o o o o
*£> m o in
*-4 co in co
CM CO V0 *^
CO CM CM CM
O *-O \D O
i-l CO r-l CO
CO
jg
Q) (D
C C
s s
c c
a) a» o o
C C -H -H
•r( -H 4J 4J
S S rt rt
e C
4J O..H 1H
^-i ^j
^ ^ ^ ^
^J >rj *H *H *H *H *H
a « o$ a c^ oi otf
CO CO (A 03 CO 0) CO
3 41 01 4) 41 41 41 m
e«ccccecccc
tJOd(iBBEBEEE
rtCCcococococowco
CQO.fi.^^^^WWW
c? C5 c^5 r*^ in ro co co vo r^** ^^
o^ o^ oo ^j r**> *^ c^j I*"* *~^ vo ^o
o) CM in i— t *i0 QO '"' **o
1—4 ^-
cjmoooooooo
ooooomoooo
cMvocor^>*r>-Or-4in\o
CM r-iin
•H .H C C -H C 1-1 -H vH C
JJ 4-1 -H 'H CU -H CU PJ PM -r-l
rt rt 5S S S S
C C (U 4) 01 4)
•H-H4J4JW4JCOWC04-J
4343t*-'lM 34-1 3 3 34-1
0
C
•r-l
B
rt
0)
42
4J
C
•H
4J
t3
0)
4J
rt
8
r-4
8
•H
•a
g
a
00
4)
C
3
•O
n
rt
y
rt
4-1
V)
3
to
II
(U
c
•H
E
C
o
•H
4J
rt
C
45
E
0
O
*
j^
4J
•H
c
r-l
rt
^
i— i
rt
0)
(1)
4J
O
c
0)
a
•it
60
-------
LEGEND
ABANDONED GAS WEU.
UNDCRGROUND MINE
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
MINE REFUSE
STRIP MINE
-------
Mclntyre area.
During the reinvest!gation of Blacklegs Creek (1971) this efflu-
ent was again sampled; however, no flow measurement was obtained. At
the second sampling, the effluent from Mine No. 646 exhibited a net
alkalinity of 157 mg/1 (acidity 68 mg/l).
Mine No. 5207
Mine No. 5207 was not located during the initial survey in 1966.
It was found and sampled for the first time in 1971. It was not
determined if this site represents a mine opening or a breakout
point from an underground mine located elsewhere in the general area.
The 310 gpm effluent carried an acid load of I,6l8 Ib/day. This ef-
fluent imparts noticeable discoloration to Big Run in the area up-
stream of Mine No. 604.
Mine No. 553^
This mine was located near the headwaters of Wolford Run. The
36 gpm effluent represents cumulative seepage collected several
hundred yards below a strip mined area. There were several drift
openings in the strip mine highwall but they were dry. The acid
load carried by the discharge was 76l Ib/day.
Mine No. 5535
The source of this 16 gpm discharge was a drift mine which has
been intersected by a surface mine. There were at least three or
four additional openings within this small disturbed area, but
they were dry.
63
-------
This discharge was located In Wolford Run. The acid load vas 595
Ib/day.
Mine No. 5536
At this mine site a 30 gpm effluent was collected below an area
which has been mined by both surface and underground methods. The
strip mine area is several hundred yards in length and at least three
drift openings were located in the highwall. The drift openings were
dry; however, there was considerable seepage about the base of the spoil
piles. The cumulative seepage from this area is collected in a pond
which then discharges to an unnamed tributary of Wolford Run. The
acid load was 698 Ib/day.
Mine No.
This mine is located immediately below the Beaver Run Reservoir.
The 110 gpm discharge emanates from the base of a strip mine highwall
at a point about 50 yards from a drift mine opening. The acid load
carried by the effluent was 2,90^ Ib/day. A second effluent was
located on the opposite side of the same drift opening. The acid load
of this 10 gpm discharge (Mine Ho. 55^7) was 263 Ib/day.
Mine lo. 5608
This mine was located near the mouth of Pine Run. A strip mine
extends several hundred yards along one bank of the tributary. It
appears that this operation has completely destroyed or covered the
-------
portal to an underground nine operation. In addition, numerous inter-
sections with the underground mine void were created. Continuous
seepage was observed along the length of the strip mine as veil as
three major discharge points. Mine No. 3608 represents the major
discharge point. The acid load vas 909 Ib/day. The other tvo dis-
charges contributed an additional acid load of 179 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5611
The discharge point of this mine vas also located on Pine Run.
However, it vas on the opposite bank of the tributary from the discharges
described above. The 180 gpm effluent emerged via pipe from the base
of the hillside and carried an acid load of 2,808 Ib/day. There vere
no obvious indications of mining on this bank of Pine Run. However,
the pipe may serve as a drainvay to a mine located elsevhere.
Mine Ho. 5883
This abandoned drift mine vas located within the Brovnstovn area
mining complex along the bank of the Kiskimlnetas River. Mine No.
5883 vas one of the numerous openings in this immediate area. An
80 gpm effluent vas measured at the partially open drift mouth. The
acid load vas 5,U?2 Ib/day.
Site No.'s $888, 3890, 5891, and 5892
The discharges from these four sites are not directly attributable
a mine site location but rather they result from the large mine
-------
refuse dump associated vith the Brownstown mining complex. The hilltop
refuse site covers a number of acres and at the time of survey was in
use by the Leechburg Mining Company. The combined acid load from the
four measureable discharge points was 21,881 Ib/day. The discharge from
No. 5890 had an acidity concentration of 3^*000 rag/1. Many trees and
considerable vegetation has been destroyed along the downslope side of
the refuse dump. This has resulted from many seepage areas along the
edge of the pile. It is areas such as these which prohibit the accurate
determination of the total pollutional load which this area contributed
to the Kiskiminetas River.
Mine No. 5889
This is another abandoned and caved mine opening in the Brownstown
area complex. This old opening may have been a fanway or drainway to
one of the numerous mines in the immediate area. The discharge was
located about 60 vertical feet above the river. From the point of
discharge the effluent spreads over a wide area destroying all vege-
tation before it finally enters the river. The acid load was 6,^32 Ib/day.
Mine No. $898
This mine is located along the bank of the Kiskiminetas River
about 0.7 miles above the mouth of the river. At least two caved
openings to the mine were located. The 10 gpm discharge Is about 60
vertical feet above the river. In addition to the major discharge point
there are also several seepage areas around the vicinity of the old
openings. The acid load was 672 Ib/day.
66
-------
IOYALHANNA CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
67
-------
LOYALHANNA CREEK
SUMMARY AHB OOMCLUSION3
1. Loyalhanna Creek drains an area of 300 square miles in
Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. Coal mine operations were
absent in several areas of the watershed, particularly in the
headwaters area.
2. Main stem Loyalhanna Creek and several tributaries to
Loyalhanna Creek are seriously polluted by coal mine drainage.
The effects upon stream water quality are most apparent below
the community of Latrobe.
3. A total of 52 discharging sources and approximately 900
acres of surface mined area were investigated in the Loyalhanna
Creek watershed. Discharges from the coal mine sources ranged
from one to 5,097 gpm and totalled 16.1 million gallons per day
(mgd). The total net acid load discharged by the 52 sources was
65,1*07 Ib/day.
k. At the time of survey, active operations were limited to
one surface and one small underground mine. There was no dis-
charge from either mine. Abandoned underground mines were the
major source of pollution in the watershed, contributing over
90 percent of the total net acid load.
68
-------
5. A total of 15 principal sources of mine drainage discharge
were located in the study area. These sources discharged a total
acid load of 62,1*07 Ib/day, about 96 percent of the acid load
discharged by all 52 sources inventoried during the survey. In
turn, three of the principal sources, Ho.'s 5177> 5356, and 536*1
discharged a combined acid load of nearly 25 tons per day.
69
-------
DESCRIPTION OF AREA
The headwater! of Loyalhanna Creek arise near the community of
Stahlstown. From this point, the stream flows generally north toward
LLgonier. Laughlintown Run and Linn Ron are two major headwater
tributaries of Loyalhanna Creek. Both of these tributaries drain
the mountainous areas of Laurel Hill.
Mill Creek is another major tributary which joins Loyalhanna
Creek at Ligonier. From this point, Loyalhanna Creek flows north-
west to the community of Latrobe and from there to its confluence
with the Conemaugh River at Saltsburg. The confluence of Loyalhanna
Creek and the Conemaugh River forms the Kiskiminetas River. Loyalhanna
Creek drains an area of 300 square miles and the Conemaugh River drains
an area of 1,376 square miles.
STREAM WATER QOMJTY
At the time of the study, Loyalhanna Creek was unaffected by
mine drainage above the confluence of Mill Creek in the community
of Ligonier. There were no coal mine operations inventoried on
any of the headwater tributaries above Ligonier.
The first area of coal mining activity in the watershed oc-
curred on Mill Creek. Although there were numerous discharging
mine sites located on tributaries to Mill Creek, the effects upon
the water quality of main stem Mill Creek were moderate. There
were no major sources of mine drainage pollution located in the
area of the watershed between Ligonier and the downstream community
of Latrobe.
70
-------
In the community of Latrobe, Loyalhanna Creek received two
massive discharges from abandoned mines. In combination, these
two effluents completely deplete the in-stream alkalinity and
Loyalhanna Creek remains grossly polluted over its entire remain-
ing downstream length. A third such discharge was located on
Crabtree Creek which drains to the headwaters of Loyalhanna Reservoir.
During the course of the field study (1968) several stream
locations were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 8). These
stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine
drainage. A summary of this stream data is presented in Table 9.
The locations of these sampling points are shown in Figure 6.
With the exception of Station No. 5622, all stream sampling
points are located below (downstream) major mine drainage inflow.
Station No. 5622, USGS gage at Kingston, was located above (upstream)
all major sources of mine drainage. As shown in Table 9, the acidity
concentration exceeded the alkalinity concentration on two of the
three sampling dates. However, the pH of the stream at this point
remained above 8.0. Mine drainage discharges totalling about 1500
Ib/day were discharged to watershed streams above Kingston. As
mentioned, most of this acid load was discharged to Mill Creek.
Although this tributary adds acidity to Loyalhanna Creek, the
stream is apparently well buffered and assimilates the acidity
without lowering the pH of the stream.
71
-------
TABLE 8
Stream water quality sampling stations
Loyalhanna Creek
Station
No.
Sampling Period
Stream
Location
5623
562U
5^30
5292
5616
Oct. Hoc, Dec, 1968
Oct, Noc, Dec, 1968
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968
Nov, Dec, 1968
July, Oct, Nov, 1968
Oct, Nov, Dec, 1968
Loyalhanna Creek
Monastery Run
Saxmans Run
Crabtree Creek
Loyalhanna Creek
Getty Run
USGS gage @ Kingston
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
USGS gage below reservoir
Near mouth
72
-------
During the earlier 1966 stream survey, an additional stream
sampling point (Ho. 572) was located on Loyalhanna Creek above
Ligonier. This station was located above all mine drainage inflow.
On each of the six samplings at this station, Loyalhanna Creek
carried a net alkalinity. However, acidity was present on each
sampling occasion. The acidity concentration ranged from 5 ng/1
to 11 mg/1 while the alkalinity concentration ranged from 12 mg/1
to 39 mg/1 (Appendix A). This background water quality sampling
location indicates that, although the stream was consistently al-
kaline, an appreciable amount of natural acidity was carried by
Loyalhanna Creek in the headwaters of the watershed. This natural
in-stream acidity, in combination with the acid load discharged to
Loyalhanna Creek by Mill Creek nay, in part, account for the con-
ditions found at the Kingston sampling point.
Miller Run is a small tributary which enters Loyalhanna Creek
at Kingston* The mouth of Miller Run is approximately 123 feet
upstream of the gage house on the same bank of the Creek. Several
dry mines and one discharging mine were located on Miller Run. The
sampling point location at Kingston was inadvertently located at the
USGS gage. The flow reading was obtained from the gage house and
the sample collected along the bank of the stream. Ideally, the
sample point should have been above the mouth of Miller Run. The
samples, as collected only a little more than 100 feet below the
mouth of Miller Run, may not have accurately represented the water
quality of Loyalhanna Creek at this point.
73
-------
a
n
I
o
I
g
S
n
f+
g
o.
e
H-
O
VI
: : ON
ON
H H M
ro H o
ro ui
e-o o
ON ON ON
00 CD CO
VO H
j VO ~J
Ul ON M
e- c- o
UJ UJ
• VI H
OO
H ro
ONH ro
VI O O
ooo
ro -f vi
o o tr-
>JI O O
ro H
O VO Ul
vi £- H
-• ro ro
OVO 0
*O H CO
f f UJ
-* VI &•
-) o -i
O H ON
1 H
Ul 1 H
3 1 O
1
UJ 1
O 1 VO
VI 1 ON
e- i co
— i fr VO
—i o ro
C-vo *-
H
Co vo — q
-j ON 00
ro u> o
ro vo H
ro
\3 ro ON
P Ul ON
— ] IV) VO-
ro vi ON
CO f- VI
3 *$
$
J O — 1
H UJ H
U) O H
O CO CD
-1 O
ro -i vo
300
A! UJ uj
»-• u) ro
M M ro
O UJ H
838
CrO O
H CD
H U) VI
Sro Co
ONCO o
U) U) f
O J?" O
«-o o
£$r
>N— ) \J\
\J\ ON-
ON ON
o
£ i\j -5
Ol O XJ1
vjl f\) OJ
• <* to
esr
O CO H
VI
o
^O ON VI
ro vi o
-* "
O VI VI
*r- ON— 1
>o ro o
Ul f VI'
-I ONro
ro
UJ VI
H Ul VI
U> Ul K-
H I-1 -l
ro
10 UJ
ONIO Q
-1 ONVS
CO Go ON
: rc?-
°
O H H
H M
U) VO VI
ON ON ON
00 OB CO
ON VO VI
M ro H
CO — 1 Ul
VI ON f
CO VO C*N
VO VO VI
VI VI O
ooo
ro H ro
vi ro u>
OHO
-. (_. H
vi VH
O VI -^
ro o co
UJ Ul C"
vi ro -I
VI O ON
ro u> ro
ON VI VO
Al VI Ul
e--i ui
I
H 1 CO
§1 CD
I 0
1
1 VI
'*- I "ro
ro I *r
H 1 -)
-J f
O -> CO
000 bo
VI VI VI
H u> ro
O H CD
Ul -1 NO
O H UJ
ro coo
H O Co
vn O v/i
trf 1
H 00 1
\
t 3 ON
*"
O M O
I-1 ro
yj Co er
ON ON ON
00 00 00
H ro H
ONUJ H
CDCOH
O N/l O
tn vi ^-
J>" ON VI
n ro o
o vi o
AI ro uj
ONON4^
«> VI VI
vi vi ro
o *-vo
ro ro 4=-
3 O ON
J>* ON VI
Al ON ^~
00 VO H
VI 1 -1
§1 ON
I VI
1
j ' H
81 G
*r | O
^/1 f OO
ONO -1
O O VO
H t-> H
_i H I-.
O VI H
*-U)-l
ro ro vi
ffftg
H M
O OOVI
o e--t
m
= =ON
UJ
H H H
OHO
UJ H UJ
~^vo H
ON ON ON
& 00 CD
ro *•
UJ H UJ
ONro -J
OOONH
-1-1-1
IN) vi ro
ONONfO
vi ro-i
O VI VI
1
M ui vo
U> ON-1
1
Al CDUI
co ro ro
H H ro
*--! Ul
ONH o
IT OOH
-• V"o
00 ONUJ
H i *•
— J 1 UJ
O I vn
OO 1 VO
U) 1 U)
J ) ^
H
•Ul OJ *-
OJ CTN ON
gSs?
H H C-
-1 O O
OOO 00
H ro o
f H CO
sl.
«*s
a
H H H
ro !-• o
^Kn
DCDCD
31^*-
558
CO 00 CD
ui o ro
ro ro f
o cp o
5 So
ro i H
*- CO VI
ro I
-• U)
-i ro -i
UJ CD OO
vn — i -i
c-ro vi
Bto u>
vo ON oo
OOVI CO
ho vo oo
So1?
Ul H
J Ul tr
VI O f
ro CD-I
ooo
CD ON ON
-i ro
ro -4 ui
vi ro M
0 0
Ul O H
ro
\J O VI
H H O
ON VI *C
fo SM
.f
^^
H
^
!l
•9
3
|l
H
> n
I **
» |0
?E
a H-
* <+
*•«•*
R
P
-------
I KISKIHINCT4S
Rivet
% &ALTS1URO
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 6
LOYALHANNA CREEK
WATE^ QJAI.ITY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
-------
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
Approximately 165 mining sites and an estimated 900 acres of
surface mined area were investigated in this study. Samples for
chemical analysis were collected from 52 sources discharging at the
time of the survey. The total effluent volume was 11,165 gpm or 16.1
million gallons per day (mgd). The total net acid load discharged
to Loyalhanna Creek and its tributaries was 65,^07 Ib/day.
A description of the mine drainage source follows. All mine site
locations inventoried in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed are shown
in Figure 7-
Mill Creek
The first upstream area of coal mine operations in the Loyalhanna
Creek watershed were located on Hannas Run, a tributary to Mill Creek.
Mill Creek drains an area of 21 square miles. However, the mine operations
were limited to the portion of the drainage area around the community
of Wilpen.
A number of surface and underground mines were located on Hannas
Run. Several of the old underground mine operations were associated
with the production of coke. Banks of abandoned and deteriorating
bee-hive coke ovens remain at several of the old underground mine sites.
Most of the surface mines were quite limited in size and were restricted
to hill top locations.
Mine No.1s 5266 and 5267 were located on an unnamed tributary to
Hannas Run west of Wilpen. Both were small underground mines and probably
76
-------
quite limited In the extent of development. The combined acid load
from these mines was 156 It/day. Northeast of these two mines a
series of six drift mines were located on another unnamed tributary
to Hannas Run. The total net acid load discharged by these mines
was k2k Ib/day (Mine Ho.'s 5269, 5270, 5271, 527^, and 5275).
Several underground mine openings appear to have been destroyed or
covered by a surface mine at Wilpen. At least two underground openings
were located within the disturbed area. A l8o gpm effluent was measured
at Mine Ho. 5265. The second mine opening was dry.
The last sources of mine drajbage to enter Mill Creek were located
on an unnamed tributary west of Oak Grove. A total acid load of 7^8
Ib/day was discharged to this tributary from three sources. Mine No. 5264
was an old drift opening discharging at the rate of 40 gpm. The acid
load was 259 Ib/day. There are several surface mines located near
the headwaters of this tributary. There were no discharges draining
directly to the tributary; however, these mines were affecting the
water quality of this small stream. Below the disturbed area an acid
load of 428 Ib/day was carried by the tributary.
Loyalhanna Creek, Llgonler to Latrobe
Clark Hollow was the first downstream area affected by mine drainage
in this portion of the watershed. A total of nine drift mine openings
were located along Clark Hollow. At the time of the survey a small
one-man drift mine was active in this area. The mine was dry. Several
hundred yards below this operation a 30 gpm effluent from one of the
old drift openings was located. This discharge carried an acid load
of 108 Ib/day.
77
-------
Two slumped drift mine openings were located south of Route 30
and adjacent (west side) to Idlewild Amusement Bark. What appears
to be a mine seal was located at the base of one of these slumped
openings. A 12 gpm effluent was measured at the seal. The drain-
age formed a small impoundment and then overflowed to Loyalhanna
Creek. The acid load from this mine (No. 5072) was 127 Ib/day.
Miller Run enters Loyalhanna Creek just upstream of the USGS
gaging station at Kingston. A total of ten mine openings were
located within this 3*6 square mile drainage area. Mine Ho. 5073
contributed an acid load of 27 Ib/day. All other mine sites were dry.
Hinemile Run
Ninemile Run drains an area of 21 square miles south of
Latrobe. The tributary enters Loyalhanna Creek just north of the
intersection of Routes 30 and 982.
Abandoned underground mine operations were located near the
communities of Whitney, Hostetter, and Baggaley. The location of
the mine openings have been destroyed or filled. The only source
of mine drainage located in this area was on a small unnamed trib-
utary which joins Hinemile Run at Baggaley. The source of the
drainage was a large refuse pile adjacent to the stream. Seepage
from this pile had grossly degraded the water quality of the trib-
utary. The acid load carried by the stream below the refuse area
was 1,928 Ib/day (Ho. 5351).
78
-------
There were no additional drainage sources located on Ninemile
Run during the survey.
Monastery Run - Fourmile Run
There were no discharging sites located on Monastery Run.
However, what appeared to be an old entry to the St. Vincent mine
was located along the bank of Monastery Run. The only evidence
which remains at the site is a mine refuse pile.
Fourmile Run, a tributary to Monastery Run, was seriously
polluted as a result of mine discharges. One drift mine and
several surface mines were located near the headwaters of the
stream; however, these mines were dry. In the downstream area,
above St. Vincent Lake, a series of mine drainage sources were
located adjacent to the tributary. A 22 gpm effluent was located
near an old bridge crossing above the lake. The effluent (No. 5359)
was discharged to the tributary by a 6 inch pipe. The acid load was
2U? Ib/day. Above this point, a swampy area existed along both banks
of Fourmile Run. Within this area, three additional mine discharges
were located. These discharges were artesian in character and con-
tributed considerable mine drainage acidity to the tributary. The
total acid load from these sources (No.'s 5260, 526l and 5262) was
1,8U2 Ib/day. The iron load from these sources was ?UO Ib/day.
Similar sites were located adjacent to the tributary; however, these
sites were situated almost at stream level and therefore not readily
measurable.
79
-------
Loyalhanna Creek - Latrobe Area
One of the three largest sources of mine drainage discharge in
the Loyalhanna Creek watershed was located along the bank of the
main stem just below the confluence of Monastery Run. A horizontal
pipe, several feet above stream level, discharged an effluent of
1,990 gpm to Loyalhanna Creek. This was discharge No. 536U. Due
to the velocity of the discharge and the somewhat limited capacity
of the pipe, an estimated 50-100 gpm of additional drainage was
forced through the strata surrounding the pipe.
A second effluent was located a few feet downstream of
No. 536U. The second effluent discharged from a vertical pipe
emerging from the stream bed in the middle of Loyalhannn Creek.
The discharge from this pipe was 62 gpm (No. 5363).
The discharges from No.'s 5363 and 536U were somewhat peculiar
in that, upon emergence from underground, the effluents were quite
clear and exhibited a pH of 7.U. Downstream of the discharge point,
Loyalhanna Creek became grossly discolored and the pH of the stream
began to drop. This apparently resulted from downstream hydrolysis
of the mine effluents. The result of this hydrolysis was the pro-
duction of the in-stream acidity and the precipitation of iron com-
pounds along the banks and on the stream bottom.
The effluents collected at the two points indicated that a
total acid load of 17,860 Ib/day was discharged to Loyelhanna Creek.
The major part of this load, 17,^32 Ib/day, was from No. 536U. The
80
-------
iron load carried by this discharge was over 8,200 Ib/day.
The discharges from No.'s 53&3 and 536U are believed to result
from the St. Vincent Mine. A local resident reported that the hori-
zontal pipe (No. 536*0 was installed in an attempt to drain as much
of the water from the old mine as possible. Before installation of
this drainway, much of the surrounding area was reported as having
been swampy and unstable similar to the situation found above
St. Vincent Lake.
This drainway may also serve as a common discharge point for
mines interconnected with the St. Vincent Mine. This could include
the mines in the Baggaley, Hostetter, and Whitney areas. It may
even include mines outside the Loyalhanna Creek drainage area such
as the mine at Marguerite. This abandoned mine is located near
the headwaters of Sewickley Creek which drains to the Monongahela
River.
Several additional boreholes were located in the same general
area as the discharges described above. A series of three boreholes
were located about Q.k mile upstream of discharge No. 536U. These
boreholes were located beside a small oxbow lake adjacent to Loyal-
hanna Creek. The holes were dry but a local resident reported that
they do drain after periods of heavy rainfall.
Saxman Run
The headwaters of this tributary rise near the small community
of West Derry, and were immediately degraded by mine drainage. Three
81
-------
shaft mines and one drift mine were located in this area. A 70 gpm
discharge was found at Mine No. 5071*. A portion of this drainage
emerges from a pipe at the shaft site and the remaining part of the
discharge emerges from a structure similar to a spring house adjacent
to an occupied house on the opposite side of the road. The acid load
was 183 Ib/day. Mine No. 5075 contributed an additional discharge of
15 gpm which carried an acid load of 35 Ib/day. This was also a
shaft mine and similar to the other two in the area, which had re-
cently been filled.
Two additional shaft mines and one drift mine were located near
the community of Bradenville; however, these mines were dry.
A 2,269 gpm discharge from Mine No. 5177 was located near the
mouth of Saxman Run. The original mine opening has been destroyed
by highway construction. During the construction, a culvert was
placed under the road bed and the mine discharge drains under the
highway via this culvert to Saxman Run. The acid load contributed
by this discharge was 12,389 Ib/day. This was the second of the
three major discharges located in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.
As with the St. Vincent drainway, the discharge from this mine is
reportedly supplied by a series of interconnected underground mines.
Union Run
Large slope and shaft mines were located on the two headwater
tributaries of Union Run near the communities of Peanut and Atlantic.
The mines did not have discharges at these points; however, seepage
82
-------
was contributed to the streams from the refuse piles associated
with the old mines. Further downstream, additional underground
and several surface mines were located along Union Run. The
total acid load from three discharging sites (Nine No.'s 5301,
3302, and 5303) was 229 Ib/day. These three discharges in combina-
tion with the immeasurable seepage areas throughout the drainage
area are sufficient to completely degrade the water quality of
Union Run over its entire length. At its mouth, Union Run had a
pH of 3.5 and a conductivity of 1,250.
It appears likely that the discharge point on Saxman Run (Ho. 5177)
may also drain some of the larger mines in the Union Run drainage area.
Loyalhanna Creek, main stem and minor tributaries
Only minor amounts of mine drainage were discharged to Loyalhanna
Creek below Union Run and the next major downstream tributary, Crab-
tree Creek.
One surface mine and one underground mine were the only sources
located on the east bank of Loyalhanna Creek. Two slumped drift
mine openings were located below the Keystone Lake dam. The com-
bined acid load from these openings was 280 Ib/day. The surface
mine was dry.
Seven surface mines and four drift mine openings were located
along the west bank of Loyalhanna Creek. Only two of these mine
sites were discharging. An acid load of 3 Ib/day was discharged
by Mine Ho. 5358 and Mine No. 5357 contributed an acid load of
121 Ib/day.
-------
Crabtree Creek
Crabtree Creek has been extensively mined in all portions of its
19 square mile drainage area. Several of the underground operations
appear to have been quite extensive and were often associated with
coke production.
The first major mine site in the Crabtree Creek drainage area
was located in the community of Forbes Road. The nine was apparently
a shaft or slope which has been filled or covered. The mine build-
ings are currently used by a small local industry. Mine refuse dumps
are located along both banks of Crabtree Creek.
The next major downstream mine site on Brabtree Creek was loca-
ted at Hannastown. This mine also had a slope or shaft opening
which has been filled or covered. A very large refuse pile is lo-
cated along the north bank of Crabtree Creek and contributed con-
siderable seepage to the stream. Below this refuse pile, an acid
load of 898 Ib/day was carried by Crabtree Creek (Sta. Ho. 5355).
A series of surface and underground mines were located on
Little Crabtree Creek. Mine Mo. 535^ was the only mine on this
tributary which contributed drainage during the study. The acid
load from this combination surface and underground mine was 100 Ib/day.
The largest single source of mine drainage in the loyalhanna
Creek watershed was located about 0.5 mile below the confluence of
Little Crabtree Creek and Crabtree Creek. This 5,097 gpm discharge
was from the Crabtree Mine (Mine No. 5356). However, this discharge
point also drains other mines in the surrounding area which are
-------
interconnected with the Crabtree Mine. The acid load discharged to
Crabtree Creek by this single source was 19,572 Ib/day.
Stream sampling conducted near the mouth of Crabtree Creek
coincident with the mine drainage survey showed that this stream
discharged an average acid load exceeding 15,000 Ib/day to Loyal-
hanna Creek (Table 9).
Loyalhanna Creek, Hew Alexandria Area
Approximately 20 surface mines and several abandoned under-
ground mines were located in this general area. The only major
underground site was the slope or shaft mine at Shieldsburg.
There was no direct discharge from the mine; however, the large
refuse pile contributed considerable seepage to the unnamed tribu-
tary which drains this area. The remaining mines in the area were
either dry or contributed only insignificant amounts of mine drain-
age acidity to the tributaries draining the area.
A total of seven underground mines and two surface mines were
located along the banks of Loyalhanna Creek Just below the Loyal-
hanna Reservoir dam. Hone of these mines contributed any mine
drainage discharge.
Getty Run
Getty Run was the last downstream tributary affected by mine
drainage before the confluence of Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh
River at Saltsburg. The stream is totally degraded over its entire
length as a result of mine drainage. A total of 12 discharges with
a combined acid load of 8,091 Ib/day were inventoried on this tributary.
85
-------
Mine Ho. 5170 discharged the major part of the total acid
load. This mine was located near the headwaters of the tributary
and discharged at the rate of 2kO gpm. The acid load was U,060 Ib/day.
A second significant acid load was discharged by Mine Ho. 5171. The
opening was located about 30 feet above stream level and discharged
U5 gpm. The opening may represent a drainway or airway for one of
the numerous mines in this area. The acid load discharged by Mine
Ho. 5171 was 9*0 Ib/day. Mine Ho.'s 5173 and 5176 discharged acid
loads of 936 Ib/day and Ul7 Ib/day, respectively, to small unnamed
tributaries of Getty Run. These mine discharges were located in
areas associated with both surface and underground mine operations.
Mine Ho.'s 5163 and 516U represent the last two major discharge
points on Getty Run. These mines were located on an unnamed tribu-
tary to Getty Run. The mines were hillside drifts located directly
across from each other on opposite banks of the small tributary.
The acid loads from Mine Ho.'s 5163 and 5164 were 688 Ib/day and
586 Ib/day, respectively.
At the time of the source investigation, a rather large drift
mine operation near the mouth of Getty Run had recently been closed.
The tipple was being disassembled at the time. This mine did not
contribute any direct discharge. However, severe leaching occurred
at the base of the refuse pile associated with the mine. Seepage
areas were common throughout all portions of the Getty Run drain-
age area. This was particularly evident below the surface mined
areas.
-------
Stream sampling near the mouth of Getty Run, coincident with
the source inventory, indicated that this tributary discharged an
average acid load of about 15,000 Ib/day to Loyalhanna Creek
(Table 9).
A total of 52 discharging sources and approximately 900 acres of
surface mined area were investigated during this study. Table 10
presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading
(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams
in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed. Table 11 presents a summary of
flow volumes and chemical loading by source type for the 52 dis-
charging sources inventoried during the study.
roLLUTIOH ABATEMENT
As shown in Table 11 , shaft mines were the principal pollution
sources in the study area. The total acid load discharged from shaft
or slope mine sources was 51,88l Ib/day. Drift mines were the sec-
ondary major source type and discharged an acid load of 9>08U Ib/day.
In addition, significant acid loads were discharged by one surface
mine and two mine refuse areas.
Including all source types, a total of 15 principal sources of
mine drainage discharge were located in the Loyalhanna Creek study
area. These sources included six shaft or slope mines, six drift
mines, two mine refuse dumps, and one surface mine. These sources
discharged a total acid load of $2,U?0 Ib/day, about 96 percent of
the acid load discharged by all 52 sources located during the survey.
-------
VICINITY MAP
-------
•
q
f~i
S
CQ
M
g
rt
,
O
0> i-4
60
rt
C
•H
rt
•a
01 >
£4
rt ^
60X1
Cc2
'P
rt C n)
rt O TJ
O H Xl
H •-!
^^
0) x-
4-1 >
cfl cfl
vw -a
rt "V.
3 X)
00 rt
Nw
01 ^s
rt 01 >
rt a) rt
j_) £j *"^j
H h Xt
rt >-i
33 v^
•U
0) >s^»
25 4J >
•H tt
i— I *^ ^j
rt -H -v.
4J O Xl
O <| rt
H ^
0)
60
rt rt E
4J XI ft
O o bl
H 01 ^
•rH
Q
CO
VM 10
O 0
. 3
0 0
g
rt
0)
i-l
CO
60
C
•H
•H
O>
o
<2
00
m
oo
oo
vO
oo
m
<^
oo"
m
^
ON
1^
>j"
ON
*^
oo
vO
CM
00
o\
n
p^.
r- 1
"^
^O
o
«t
CM
CO
M O
01 4J
0)
I-l 01
U X)
•H
C 4J
c
rt *^3
Xl U
rt rt
^% C
CO O
CM
CM ^t
m
o oo
CO ON
vO
CO Is*
O vO
CO CO
VD
co r^
f^i \o
rt m
rt
VO CM
co r^
CM rt
•\
m
-u
c (-1 »^
3 U rt
0) U
4-> p d)
4J 4J i-(
a) xi -u
O W 4-1
-, -H
m ON
Sis
•* CM
O CM
CM
- m o
CM *^- ON
00 in ON
rt rt
^
1— 1(
oo co m
*< rt 00
i^ i in
oo o i~~
<(• oo oo
i-l rt CM
CO rt ON
0 0
Q)
01 fl) Oi G
Xi U Xi 3
*H O *H PC
j_i C J-<
4-1 Iff 3 U 0)
TJ i-t TJ C
s
4J
•H
C
01
a)
4J
o
-------
0)
5
CO
o
3
o
CO
>-, CD
XI CO
jj
CO O
00
C cd
•H C
•0 C
cd cd
0 X!
r-l r-l
cd
CD rS
GO O
rt H^
•H
cd
•O
(U
c
2
E «••»
C cd
•r4 *^
B *x
3 iO
<3
<0 /->
CO >
cd C cc
4J O "O
O Jj ^
H r-l X
^
COx-v
cd n
m TJ
3 XI
C/J r-l
CO ^-s
CO >
a) cd
C T3
jj X
Cd r-
pcj **>
4J
CO £»>o
•H Cl
r-1 TJ TJ
Cd -H -V.
4J O XI
0 ^"
•*
r-l
0
ON
O
*»
vO
CM cd
b
n)
"S
«*>, C
ON .H
*> B
O CO
^ §
CO
co
CO 4J
m
00 C
** *H
CM fi
O JJ
•-I -H
£$
-d
co
4J
S
fx, O
0 r-4
CO
m c
vO -1-4
3
T3
C
§
)_)
m oo
vO I-i
r-4 CD
TJ
•-< c
r-l 3
•a
c
cd
(U
o
cd
CM 4-1
m n
3
03
CO
C
•H
(3
c
0
. -H
U
cd
C
•H
X)
>— 1 O
<: u
t*
H *
-------
In the Loyalhanna Creek watershed, all site* which contributed
an acid load in excess of 1*00 Ib/day are considered as principal
sources.
A designed program of pollution abatement in the Loyalhanna
Creek must give primary consideration to Mine No.'s 5177, 5356,
and 536U. These three mines contributed the massive acid discharges
on Saxman Run, Crabtree Creek, and main stem Loyalhanna Creek. Al-
though the other source types listed above discharged significant
acid loads, abatement of these sources without previous or concurrent
abatement of the three largest discharges, would result in only an
insignificant water quality improvement within the watershed* Mine
No.'s 5177, 5356 and 536^ discharged a combined acid load of nearly
25 tons per day. The remaining 12 principal source sites discharged
an acid load of 6.5 tons per day. By comparison, the acid load dis-
charged by Mine Ho. 5177, the smallest of the three major sources
(12,389 Ib/day), closely approximated the combined acid load of the
other 12 sites (13,077 Ib/day).
It is necessary to consider the other 12 sources sites in a
complete program of drainage abatement. Failure to consider these
sources would result in the discharge of significant acid loads to
watershed streams even after abatement of the three major source
sites. This is of particular importance on Getty Run. Without
abatement of the principal sources on this small tributary, sig-
nificant amounts of acid drainage would be discharged to Loyalhanna
93
-------
Creek. During the mine drainage survey, Getty Run (Sta. Ho. 5616)
discharged an average acid load of about 15,000 Ib/day to Loyalhanna
Creek.
The abatement of mine drainage is often a difficult task, ir-
respective of the source type responsible for the discharge. In
addition to the problems associated with the sealing of underground
drift mines and the reclamation of surface mines and gob pile areas,
a mine drainage remedial program in this watershed is faced with the
difficult problem of abating large volumes of mine drainage emanat-
ing from interconnected shaft or slope mine complexes. This parti-
cular problem is represented by the discharges associated with
Mine Ho.'s 5177, 5363 and 536U.
It is beyond the scope of this initial mine drainage survey
to accurately assess the magnitude of the abatement problem which
these mines represent. However, based on the initial study, it is
apparent that until such a time when drainage control can be suc-
cessfully achieved at these sites, abatement at the other 12 source
sites would be of only minimal value.
Since completion of the 1968 survey, the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania has initiated additional engineering studies in the
Loyalhanna Creek watershed. This study is designed to recommend
specific abatement measures for the mine sources in the watershed.
The laboratory data and mine site location naps developed during
the 1968 study and presented in this document provided the preli-
minary basis for the secondary study. It is anticipated that this
-------
study if 111 provide a detailed plan of abatement for mines in the
Loyalhanna Creek watershed.
Detailed engineering studies and long term repetitive water
quality sampling of the discharge sites may necessitate the con-
sideration of additional sources or perhaps the deletion of some
sources initially considered. However, the further development
of correlation between mine discharge characteristics and stream
water quality will not alter the primary abatement considerations
warranted by Mine Ifo. fs 5177, 5363 and 53#».
The following is a more detailed description of the 15 prin-
cipal sources recommended for abatement. These sources can ef-
fectively serve as a first phase or priority in a program of
drainage source abatement in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed.
These sources are listed in Table 12 and the mine site locations
are shown in Figure 8.
FRIHCmL SOURCES
Mine No. 5177
This mine was located near the mouth of Saxman Run adjacent
to Route 981. The original slope opening was destroyed when
Route 981 was widened to four lanes. During construction, a cul-
vert was placed under the new road bed and the 2,269 gpm discharge
drains under the highway via the culvert to Saxman Run. This old
opening reportedly serves as a common drainway for a series of
•95
-------
CM
r-l
W
PQ
H
B
. cd
CU
JJ
CO
g
K
•H
(U
O
&
cd
•a
x
u
•H
t)
U
o B
r-l B
FZH W
v^
0)
C
u-t
o
a
H
cu
C •
£ 2
O
jj
XI
•H
to
4J C
•a «
.
cd JJ
n jj
C (U
£3 C5
00
oo
m
m
Os
o
o
oo
r-4
oo
CM
O
CU
C
y
14-1
1-H
to
Q
CO
sO
I— 1
m
O
JJ
XI
•H
JJ
T3
cu
n)
C
C
oo
in
m
00
0
i-i
o
0
CM
CM
SO
CM
in
,
Sjj
jj
C 0)
3 0
^
rH
^
O
co
I—I
o
0
0
co
oo
CM
m
CM
cu
•H
y
14-1
•H
to
Q
sO
f^*
I— 1
in
o
jj
X1
C 'to
CM
0) CU
C C
•H -H
y y
14-1 -H
Cfl rJ
CO CO
r^ co
l~^ so
rH CSJ
in in
Ky» *~^
cu cu
C CU CU
3 to to
pci 0 0
CU CU (U
•H to to
B u JJ
CU XI XI
c! td cd
•n to to
Zoo
00 00 CM
CM as r^
as oo m
rH OS
in m o
OS CO CM
CM OS CO
CM
O O O
o o o
o os m
T
m o
r^ co
m r^
0 0
o o
r^ PS.
co co
•*
-------
VICINITY MAP
-------
interconnected shaft or slope nines in the surrounding area east
and north of Latrobe.
Mine Ho. 5356
At the time of the survey, Mine No. 5356 represented the largest
single source of mine drainage discharge in the Loyalhanna Creek
watershed. The discharge was 5,097 gpm and carried an acid load of
19,572 Ib/day. The drainage flowed from a concrete culvert at the
base of the railroad bed just east of the community of Crabtree.
During periods of low flow conditions, the effluent from this mine
represents nearly the entire flow in Crabtree Creek. It was re-
ported that the discharge point serves as a common dralnway for
other large underground mines which were located in this general
area. There were no discharges located at any of these other mines.
Mine No. 536U
The discharge from Mine No. 536U was located along the bank
of Loyalhanna Creek just downstream from the confluence of Monastery
Run. At this point, a horizontal pipe extending from the bank, sev-
eral feet above stream level, discharged an effluent of 1,990 BP™
which carried an acid load of 17,860 Ib/day. At least a portion of
this total discharge is associated with the abandoned St. Vincent
Mine. Five other discharge points were located in the surrounding
area (Mine No.'s 5559, 5260, 5261, 5262 and 5263). It is assumed
that these discharges are also associated with the St. Vincent Mine.
99
-------
A local resident reported that the horizontal pipe was in-
stalled in an attempt to drain the water from the mine as rapidly
as possible. Before Installation of the pipe, the drainage was
discharged to the surface by a number of boreholes and natural
drainways. The five discharges listed above may represent points
where that part of the total discharge, which exceeds the capacity
of the pipe, is discharged to the surface. At the time of sampling,
an estimated 50-100 gpm of additional drainage was forced through
the strata surrounding the pipe at the major discharge site (No.
As is the case with Mine No. 's 5177 and 5356, the effluent
from Mine No. 53&H is believed to represent a cumulative discharge
from other mines interconnected with the St. Vincent Mine. Such
mines could include those at Baggaley, Hostetter, and Whitney.
The discharge point may even drain mines outside the Loyalhanna
Creek watershed such as the mine at Marguerite. This abandoned
mine is located near the headwaters of Sewickley Creek which
drains to the Monongahela River.
Mine No. 's 5163 and 5l6U
These mines are located on an unnamed tributary to Getty Run.
Both mines were hillside drifts directly across from each other on
opposite banks of a small tributary. A small refuse pile was asso-
ciated with each mine indicating that neither mine was developed to
any large extent. The acid loads from Mine No. 's 5163 and 516H were
688 Ib/day, and 586 Ib/day, respectively.
100
-------
Mine No. 5170
This mine was located near the headwaters of Getty Run where
Route 819 crosses the stream. It was not determined if the dis-
charge point represented an old mine opening or whether this was
a drainway for the numerous mines in the area. The opening is
adjacent to the railroad tracks immediately behind St. Sylvester
Church. The discharge was 2kQ gpm and carried an acid load of
U,060 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5171
Mine Ho. 5171 vas located downstream of Mine Ho. 5170 on
the same side of Getty Run. The opening was located about 30
feet above stream level and discharged **5 gpm. The acid load
was 9*0 Ib/day.
Mine Mo. 5173
This mine contributed a discharge of 50 gpm which carried an
acid load of 936 Ib/day. The area had originally been deep mined
and was then strip mined at a later time. A local resident stated
that underground mines were in limited operation as far back as
l853< In addition to this major discharge point, an acid load of
35 Ib/day was contributed by the fanway opening to the mine.
101
-------
Mine No. 5176
This mine opening may be interconnected with Mine No.'s 5171
and 5172. The openings are at approximately the same elevation
on opposite sides of the same hill. The opening at No. 5176 has
completely caved and the 25 gpm effluent discharges from the base
of the slumped area. The outcrop coal on both sides of this mine
has been removed by surface mining. These operations have cre-
ated numerous points of intersection with the underground mine
voids.
Mine No. 5263
Mine No. 5263 is the only surface mine site classified as a
principal source in the Loyalhanna Creek watershed. The mine was
located on an unnamed tributary to Mill Creek west of the commu-
nity of Oak Grove. There were actually two surface mine sites
near the headwaters of the tributary. There were no major dis-
charge points emanating from either surface mine. However, con-
siderable seepage was present along the downslope perimeter of
both mines. This seepage has a cumulative effect which was re-
sponsible for the degraded water quality in the tributary. The
acid load measured in the stream below the mined areas was k$k Ib/day.
Site No. 5351
A large mine refuse dump near the communities of Hostetter
and Baggaley contributed an acid load of 1,928 Ib/day to an un-
named tributary of Ninemile Run. There was no discharge from
10?
-------
an underground mine at this site. The degraded water quality of
the snail tributary was a direct result of the refuse pile. Tbis
pile is located imediately adjacent to the tributary along an
area about O.U mile in length.
Site No. 5355
Below the large mine refuse dump at Hannastown, Crabtree
Creek carried an acid load of 898 Ib/day. The gradual accumula-
tion of seepage at the base of the refuse pile and the subsequent
discharge to Crabtree Creek results in the acid condition found
in the stream.
Mine Ho.'a 536l. 5362 and 5363
The acid loads contributed by these mine sit* discharge
points were 907 Ib/day, 835 Ib/day, and U28 Ib/day, respectively.
They are considered in this section as individual discharge points
but actually they are associated with the major discharge found at
Mine No. 536U (See Mine No. 536U, page 99 ).
Bo. 5361 and 5362 were located on Four-mile tun above St. Vincent
Lake. The discharges were artesian in nature and responsible for the
somewhat swampy area found above the lake. Several other areas were
located along the banks of Fourmile Run which appeared to contribute
additional drainage during other hydrologic periods.
103
-------
AT vertical pipe emerging from the stream bed in the middle
of Loyalhanna Creek was the source of the effluent found at
Ho. 5363. This pipe was located only a few feet downstream of
the major discharge point, Ho. 536U. This second effluent was
62 gpm and carried an acid load of U28 Ib/day.
-------
CONEMAUGH RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
105
-------
COR9AUBH RIVER
AHD OOMCLUSIOHS
1. The Conemaugh River and its minor tributaries drain an area of
310 square miles. The entire 51 mile length of the Conemaugh
River from its formation at Johnstown to its confluence with
Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg is severely polluted as a result
of coal mine discharges. This water quality degradation results
from mine discharges within the drainage boundary as well as
from massive amounts of mine drainage inflow contributed by Stony
Creek, Blacklick Creek, and the Little Conemaugh River.
2. A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately 1,700 acres of
surface mined area were investigated in the study area. Discharges
from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 1,710 gpm and totalled
over If. 3 million gallons per day (mgd). The total net acid load
discharged by the 36 sources was 35,10U Ib/day.
3. There was only one active underground mine in operation at the
time of the survey. This was Mine Ho. 5200 which contributed an
alkaline load of 8 Ib/day. Abandoned drift mines and coal refuse
piles were the major sources of pollution in the sub-basin. These
sources contributed more than 80 percent of the total net acid load
discharged by all sources in the watershed.
U. A total of six principal sources of mine drainage discharge were
located in the Conemaugh River and minor tributaries sob-basin.
These sources discharged a total net acid load of 30,1*95 Ib/day.
10G
-------
This represents approximately 86 percent of the acid load contri-
buted by all discharging sources.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA
The Conetnaugh River is formed by the confluence of Stony Creek
and the Little Conetnaugh River at Johnstown, Pennsylvania. From this
point, the river flows generally north and west some 51 miles to its
confluence with Loyalhanna Creek at Saltsburg, Pennsylvania. The
confluence of Loyalhanna Creek and the Conemaugh River form the
Kiskiminetas River. The drainage area of the Conemaugh River and
minor tributaries is 310 square miles. This does not include the
drainage areas of major tributaries such as the Little Coneraaugh
River, Stony Creek, Blacklick Creek or Two Lick Creek. These major
drainage areas are included as separate sub-basin reports.
STREAM WATER QUALITY
As a result of the grossly polluted acid condition of both the
Little Conemaugh River and Stony Creek, and additional acid discharges
received by the main stem, the Conemaugh River is severely polluted by
coal mine drainage over its entire 51 mile length. The river bed and
high water levels are heavily stained and coated with precipitated
iron compounds resulting from the mine drainage discharges. Alkaline
tributary inflow entering the river is immediately assimilated with
no water quality improvement in the main stem.
107
-------
During the course of the field study, several stream locations
were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 13, Figure 9). These sta-
tions were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine drain-
age. A summary of this data is presented in Table lh. The water
quality data collected from Stony Creek at Riverside and from the
Little Conemaugh River at East Conemaugh are included. This data
reflects the background water quality of the tributaries which form
the Conemaugh River.
With the exception of Tubmill Creek, all of the streams shown
in Table 13 are affected in varying degrees by mine drainage dis-
charges over their entire length. The major mine discharge points
on Tubmill Creek which degrade the water quality of the stream are
located near the mouth of the tributary. Although there were a few
mine discharges located in the headwater area, they had little effect
upon the water quality of the stream.
The sources of pollution inventoried in the Conemaugh River sub-
basin were limited to those sources emanating from active or abandoned
coal mine operations. Wo attempt was made to document pollutional dis-
charges of a different source type. Although mine drainage is the
major source of pollution in most of the streams in the Kiskiminetas
River basin, pollution problems from sources other than mine drainage
do exist. The effects upon the water quality of the Conemaugh River,
Little Conemaugh River, and Stony Creek from steel mill and other in-
dustrial discharges were not documented. During the course of the
field study, discharges from such sources were located along the banks
108
-------
TABLE 13
Stream water quality sampling stations, Conemaugh River
main stem and minor tributaries
4792
4984
4983
5261
5382
5619
5620
5621
5625
May, 1968
June, 1968
June, October, 1968
July, December, 1968
January, 1969
August, October and
November, 1968
October, November and
December, 1968
October, November, 1968
January, 1969
October, November, 1968
January, 1969
October, November and
Stream
Two Lick Greek
Two Lick Creek
Blacklick Creek
Little Conemaugh
River
Stony Creek
Conemaugh River
Richards Run
Tubmill Creek
Aultmans Run
Location
Near Mouth
Near Moutt
USGS gage
USCS gage
Conemaugh
U3GS gage
USGS gage
Near Moutl
Near Moutl
Near Moutl:
December, 1968
109
-------
e
** t-t >rt
" al
-* s
2 *
cfl «
9 *H
§!
B 5
W2
J
•a ^
i-(
^
r-t
I
8.
00
r> in ao » m
9 5 4 at O 3 JS
» m coco-* intxcb POO co <- N 35
oo eo r-<
o»o>-< f» «•> Q •» e*
<0 ee CM in 1-1 2 CM O
r- « ce CM CM CM .-i
o oo co r» o»
neoc. en t- r
t-« m en »
•-« CM CM CM
r* ox r-t m m en o* o r*
ri O
r-r--*
* « o
Or-r-l
i-i •* -J O •« O O r~ -< P-H
O r~^e«i
>M ^ CO CM
ON t-i oo-ff m 00 Q op op O O 00
> *H r< ^ so CM o M
» 4 ^* r** ^^ !n o W
• oo" c*> r-" m m -*" «* r*-* <*"
»r^r^ mr*»n tncMop
r- O
O (SI
O ^ CM rx
S'8 2'8
« g en' g
"^ o OOO Omo moo oom *A o m oo »A
oo\ minr»
° 3 ^* 3 ^ N
^< CM iH »-(
(M « CM i-4 (O CM
fih m CM 9 m CM r-t <
< «-H p-t rH (M -^ f-4
> m I-H Q O O O «M *
I oo ON 00 9t sp wS «O (
4n in 5» «it i-* r*. i
I «
•tf^ A <
So tn
eg O
88 888 838 §25 iC5
do o S ^ o -* (^ * in*4in •* o^-
CM f-l iH
i
QQ<*] "« ^ -J CM CM CM •t»V> OOO i^tXrM
$«* 3§S SSS 222 233 332
m ^ in tttnin 3i Jo ^ 55 S in
* •« -a
-------
-------
of the-above mentioned streams. This was particularly evident in the
Johnstown and nearby community areas.
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
A description of the mine drainage sources in the Conemaugh River
sub-basin follows. All mine location sites inventoried during the
study are shown in Figure 10 following the source description section.
Hinckston Run
Only one source of mine drainage discharge was located in the 15
square mile drainage area of Hinckston Run. The discharge rate was
72 gpm which carried a net alkaline load of 101 Ib/day. The discharge
emerged from a small opening in the hillside adjacent to the road. It
did not appear that a mine portal was located in this area; however,
the opening may serve as a drainway for a mine in another location.
The hillside along much of the east bank of Hinckston Run was actively
in use as a slag dump by one of the nearby mills.
St. Glair Run
Six surface mines and 12 drift mine openings were located on
this small tributary. The only source of mine drainage was from Mine
No. 5365. This mine was an open drift located nearly 200 feet verti-
cal below a circular hilltop surface mine. The acid load discharged
by Mine No. 5365 was 121 Ib/day.
112
-------
Conemaugh River - below Johnstown
Mine No. 5l8l and 5182 were located along the Conemaugh River at
Coopersdale on the north side of Johnstown. Between this point and the
downstream community of Seward (about 6 miles) there were no mines lo-
cated on either the main stem of the river or on any of the tributaries
to the river.
Mine No.'s 5l8l and 5182 were located behind the Haws Refractory
Plant on Route U03« Both mines were abandoned; however, it appeared
that Mine No. 5l8l had recently been closed. Both the portal and air-
way were still open. Mine 5182 had been abandoned for some time. The
opening had completely slumped and the drainage emerged via pipe from
the base of the caved opening. The acid load discharged by Mine No. 5182
was 150 Ib/day and Mine No. 5l8l contributed a negligible alkaline load.
The next downstream coal mine operation was located along the north
bank of the Conemaugh River just east of the small community of Boltz.
A large underground mine was located in this area; however, the mine
openings have been closed and covered. A refuse pile of several acres
is associated with the mine. At the time of inspection, there was no
drainage from either the caved mine openings or from the refuse pile.
A series of h boreholes were located on the west side of Boltz. All
but one of these openings were capped or sealed.
Two dry drift mine openings were located along the opposite bank
of the river directly across from Boltz. Both mines were driven dir-
ectly under Route 56, about 0.6 mile upstream of the community of Seward.
A borehole discharge of 300 gpm was located near the downstream area of
Seward. There were two boreholes at this site; however, the total
113
-------
discharge was contributed by one opening. The acid load carried by
this effluent (No. 5366) was 3,5^5 Ib/day.
The active underground Conemaugh No. 1 Mine of the North American
Coal Corporation is located directly across from Mine No. 5366 on the
opposite bank of the Conemaugh River. This was one of two active mine
operations in this sub-basin area which were not inventoried during
the field study. Recent information supplied by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania indicates that this mine produces an alkaline effluent
and treatment is not required. An air shaft for this mine is located
near Hedges Lake.
Big Spring Run, Sugar Run, Baldwin Run
These tributaries were the next downstream areas on which coal
mine operations were located. A total of four drift mines, one strip
mine, and one combination surface-underground mine were located on
these tributaries. All of the mines were dry and it did not appear
that the mines contributed any more than insignificant amounts of
seepage to the receiving tributaries. The pH and conductivity values
measured at the mouth of these streams ranged from 6.9 to 8.0 and
from 90 to 170 micromhos/cm, respectively.
Conemaugh River - main stem
Mine No. 5367 was located along the bank of the Conemaugh River
approximately 0.8 mile upstream of the small community of Lockport.
Two openings to the mine were located. The effluent was 17 gpm which
11U
-------
discharged an acid load of 69^ Ib/day directly to the river.
The Robinson Mine of the Florence Mining Company was located
on the Conemaugh River east of the community of Robinson. This active
underground mine vas not inventoried during the field survey. Recent
information supplied by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania indicates
that the Robinson Mine is now interconnected with several additional
active mines. At the present, three of the four discharges from this
underground complex are alkaline. Adequate treatment is provided for
the one acid discharge.
Richards Run
A total of 15 drift mine openings and one surface mine were
located within the seven square mile drainage area of this tributary.
The first two discharging mines were located on the East Branch
of Richards Run. At Mine No. 5186 an acid load of 39 Ib/day was dis-
charged by a caved drift mine opening. A second discharging mine
(No. 5185) was located about 100 yards upstream of Mine 5186. At the
time of the field survey, Mine No. 5185 was in the process of being
sealed. The mine had only recently been closed and workmen were in-
stalling mine seals at the three openings to the mine. Two of these
three openings discharged a combined effluent of 207 gpm. However,
the discharge was essentially neutral as the acid load was only 10 Ib/day.
These openings were sampled before the installation of the mines seals
was completed.
The other area of mine drainage discharge on this tributary was
115
-------
located near the headwaters of the West Branch. A 15 gpm discharge
was sampled at Mine No. 5184. nils opening Is probably Interconnected
with four additional openings In the Immediate area. The acid load
carried by this effluent (No. 5l8fc) vas 117 Ib/day. A second discharge
was located across the road from Mine No. 5l8U. At this site a total
of U drift openings in two different coal seams were inspected. Two
of the openings were caved drift portals and the other two openings
were slope entries for a new mine under development. The only source
of drainage from this mine site vas seepage from a refuse pile. The
acid load contributed by this source (No. 5183) vas 27^ Ib/day.
Stream sampling at the mouth of Richards Run, conducted coincident
with the mine inventory, indicated that acid loads ranging from 1,000
Ib/day to lU,365 Ib/day (Tables 13, lU) vere discharged by this tributary
to the Conemaugh River.
Below the mouth of Richards Run a small unnamed tributary enters
the Conemaugh River near the community of Robinson. Four surface mines
and six drift mine openings were located on the tributary. Four of
the mine discharges (Mine No.'s 5192, 5193, 519^ and 5195) result
from points of intersection between underground and surface mine
operations. The combined acid load of these four discharges vas
522 Ib/day. The major part of this acid load (316 Ib/day) was
contributed by Mine No. 5195- An additional acid load of 22 Ib/day
was discharged by Mine No. 5197, a small drift mine not connected
with the surface mine operations.
116
-------
Tubmill Creek
Tubmill Creek is a major tributary of the Conemaugh River.
With the exception of a few scattered surface mines in the head-
water area and the drift mines near its mouth, Tubmill waa unaf-
fected by mine drainage over nearly its entire 66 square mile
drainage area.
Only two discharging mine sites were located on the head-
water tributaries to Tubmill Creek. These were Mine No.'s 5276
and 5277 on Hypocrite Creek. The total acid load discharged by
these mines was 5k Ib/day.
Mine No. 5278 was located on Tubmill Creek approximately 2
miles above the mouth of the tributary. At this point, an efflu-
ent of 185 gpm was discharged to Tubmill Creek. The acid load of
this discharge was 2,098 Ib/day. This discharge also imported a
very noticeable discoloration to the downstream length of Tubmill
Creek. The mine appears quite limited in the extent of development;
however, a local resident reported that this mine intersected and
abandoned workings of a much larger mine. Below this point and the
next downstream sources of mine drainage, additional mines were lo-
cated but they were dry. Mine No.'s 5368 and 5369 discharged a
cumulative effluent of U5 gpm which carried a combined acid load of
more than 900 Ib/day. In this area, a series of "punch holes" had
been driven into the exposed coal seam. A total of eight openings
were located; however, only mine No.'s 5368 and 5369 were discharg-
ing at the time of Inspection.
One additional major source of mine drainage discharge waa located
117
-------
on Freeman Run. This stream Is a tributary of Tubmill Creek and joins
the main stem about 0.5 mile above its mouth. Mine No. 5370 discharged
an acid load of U29 Ib/day to Freeman Run. Five additional opnlngs
were located in this same general area but were dry.
Stream sampling near the mouth of Tubmill Creek, conducted coincident
with the mine drainage survey, indicated that Tubmill Creek discharged
an acid load ranging from k,6kk Ib/day to 10^,101 Ib/day to the Conemaugh
River (Tables 13, Ifc).
McGee Run
Only one discharging mine site was located in the 26 square mile
drainage area of McGee Run. Several other mines were Investigated
but found dry. A large underground mine was located near the community
of Seger. The mine openings was caved and did not contribute any
drainage. However, a large refuse pile associated with the mine degrades
the water quality of the small unnamed tributary to McGee Run which
drains the area. An acid load of 3^7 Ib/day was measured in the
tributary below the refuse pile (No. 5373).
Six drift mine openings and two surface mines were located along
the downstream length of McGee Run, however, these sites were dry.
Conemaugh River, main stem
The largest acid load In the Conemaugh River main stem and minor
tributaries sub-basin study area was located along the south bank of
the river 0.1 mile below the confluence of McGee Run. A 1,710 gpm
discharge was measured at this site (No. 5371)' This discharge point
118
-------
probably serves as a common drainvay for several interconnected under-
ground mines in the surrounding area. Such minss would include the
Brenizer Mine on McGee Run and several slope mines on the next downstream
tributary, Stony Run. The acid load contributed by the 1,710 gpm
effluent was 17,5^5 lb/dav. A second drainage point was located
adjacent to No. 5371. This was No. 5372 which discharged an additional
effluent of 5 gpm carrying an acid load of 32 Ib/day.
Stony Run
Approximately seven surface mines and 16 underground mine openings
were investigated on Stony Run. There were no discharges located
at any of these mine sites. As mentioned above, these mines may be
drained by the large discharge point located along the bank of the
Conemaugh River.
Altmans Run
The upper 75 percent of the Altmans Run drainage area has been
extensively mined by both surface and underground operations. Several
of the surface mines are quite large covering areas in excess of
100 acres.
A large underground mine was located near the headwaters of Heal
Run, a tributary to Altmans Run, in the community of Mclntyre. The
portal to the mine had been sealed and there was no discharge. There
are two mine refuse dumps directly across from the Mclntyre Mine.
Considerable seepage was present about the perimeter of these areas.
Sample No.'s 55^2 and 55^3 indicated that the cumulative seepage
119
-------
from these piles contributed acid loads of 225 lb/day and 3,600
Ib/day respectively. The effluent from No. 5562 drained to an unnamed
tributary of Reeds Run and No. 55^3 drained to Neal Run.
Another significant acid load was discharged to Reeds Run by a
refuse dump near the headvaters of the tributary. There was no mine
opening located near this dump area and it appears that the refuse
may have been trucked from Mclntyre. The acid load contributed by
this source, No. 556^, was 2,079 lb/day.
Mine No. 5565 was a slumped drift mine opening in the base of a
surface mine hlghwall. The acid load discharged by this mine was
162 lb/day. A small unnamed tributary which enters Reeds Run near
its mouth contributed an acid load of 1,627 lb/day to the stream. This
small tributary receives significant amounts of seepage from a large
surface mined area. There were no major point sources of discharge,
however, the water quality of the tributary is grossly degraded by
the cumulative seepage from the surface mine. The tributary carried
an acid load of 1,627 lb/da^ near its mouth (No. 5566).
A small tributary to Altmans Run carried an acid load of U9 lb/day
below a surface mined area. This effluent (No. 5568) was the only
source of mine drainage discharge located on Altmans Run above the
confluence with Reeds Run.
Two extensive surface mined areas vere located on Altmans Run
and its tributaries south of Route 28^. Several under/round openings
were also located in the hiphwalls of these strip mines. Two active
underground mines were in operation at the time of the survey. These
120
-------
were the No. 1 and No. 2 mines of the C & C Coal Company. The No. 1
mine vas In operation at the time of inspection and a h gpm effluent
vas discharged via the fanway. The effluent was alkaline. The No. 2
mine was under development and at the time had penetrated the coal seam
to only a minimal extent. Both of these operations were on Coal Run
which is a tributary to Altmans Run.
A highly acid discharge was located on Coal Run within the same
surface mined area in which the C & C #2 mine was located. A portion
of the surface mine was used for mire refuse disposal. This waste
material was spread and compacted over several acres of strip mine
spoil piles. An effluent of only 2 gpm was found near the base of
the refuse area. However, the acidity concentration of this effluent
was 8,950 mg/1 (No. 5199). A considerable number of trees and other
vegetation have been destroyed by the seepage from the refuse pile.
Two large strip mine ponds near the confluence of Coal Run and
Altmans Run were sampled during the survey. There was no surface
discharge at the time of sampling, however, the ponds may contribute
drainage during high flow periods or by subsurface seepage through the
the spoil piles. These were No.'s 5569 and 5570 with acidity concen-
trations of 2^0 mf:/l and ljt mg/1, respectively.
There were no sources of mine drainage below the confluence of
Coal Run with Altmans Run. However, the acid condition of Altmans Run
persisted over the entire remaining downstream length of the tributary.
Stream sampling near the mough of Altmans Run, conducted coincident
with the mine drainage inventory, indicated that this stream discharged
an acid load ranging from 1,7^0 Ib/day to 106,9^6 Ib/day to the Conemaugh
River (Tables 13,
-------
Conemaugh River, main stem
Only a few mine operations were located in the area of the basin
below the confluence of Altmans Run. All but one of these operations
were drift or slope mines located along the banks of the Conemaugh
River. The one exception was a dry surface mine near the headwaters
of Boatyard Run.
The active Marion Mine of the Tunnelton Mining Company is
located along the north bank of the Conemaugh River just east of
the community of Tunnelton. This mine is developed to the dip and
has a pumped discharge. The mine is listed as "in compliance" accord-
ing to information supplied by the Commonwealth.
Several additional mines were investigated along the remaining
downstream length of the Conemaugh River. Such mines included those
located in the coal towns of White and Moween. The only source of
mine drainage discharge was from No. 5529. This discharge point did
not appear to represent a mine portal but rather it appeared to
represent a point where an underground mine had broken through to the
surface. The acid load carried by this 22 gpm effluent was 207 Ib/day.
A total of 36 discharging sources and approximately 1,700 acres
of surface mined area were investigated during this study. Table 15
presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading
(Ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams in
the Conemaugh River main stem study area. Table 16 presents a sum-
mary of flow volumes and chemical loading by source type for the 36
discharging sources inventoried during the study.
122
-------
CO
0)
•rH
Cg ClJ
O 4J
j_i 3
4J Xl
CO t-l
}_l
00 4J
C
•H Jj
> 0
•H C
<1J -H
u e
in rJ T3
r-l C
r^ Cfl
ti XI
JO CO S
Id 60 4J
H C co
•rH
^3 C
cd «H
O cd
rH e
0) •>
00 rJ
a £
nj W
18 -a
,
cd
C ^3
a) ^s
CO >-
•
•u cd
cd -O
14-1 -^
r-l XS
3 r-i
CO N_>
CO /->
OJ >,
r-i oj cd
cd c *O
•P *O *— ^
0 U Xi
E-i cd rH
g-t v^x
al rs/^
IS 4J >,
•H cd
cd -i-i ^
•U U Xl
O •< r-<
H ^>
<0
00
rH (-1
cd cd ^™^
4J X! 6
0 t3 0
H w W
•H *-*
Q
CO
V
VM O
O (4
• 3
O O
& CO
60
C
•H
•H cd
01 0)
O JJ
CO -H CO C
•H XI & XI 5
Prf -rl 1-1 K
rJ XI )-l
X -U 60 4J CO
60 3 C
3 *O ^u ^3 cfl
S 6 w 6 4J
Q) c^ C nj n^
C CO C 3
0 C 0 £ <
in CM m CM
rl -H
X 01 rJ C Oi Pd C
0) XI O 3 3
c BrtP-, WC4JCO
(UXi C>^ • co3 ra3C
J-i 3 C[i •*-* cdK CUOS'H
Pt4 H P CO W 5 ffi
ON
O
O
O
vO
CO
r-
oo
m
*»
rH
rH
CM
VO
VO
**
r^
^j"
ON
r^
ON
O
CM
xt
O
rH
*\
in
CO
in
o
*v
CO
^O
ro
c/i
r-4
^J
g
-------
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE
CONEMAUGH RIVER. MAINSTEM AND MINOR TR1BUTAI
JOHNSTOWN
-------
vO
^^
4)
i— i
XI
cd
H
CO
0)
•H
P
cd
4J
3
CD x>
CX-rl
S^ lj
**» w
•U 4J
(U p
0 O
l-i C
8•* C
xi cd
co E
60 53
C 4J
•rl CO
T3
cd C
O -H
^^ rt
£3
0)
bO •>
rt rl
C cu
•H >
£3
•ort
x:
cu oo
C 3
•rl fl)
cu
C
O
O
*~\
§>>
cd
n T3
•rl ^
e xi
3 T-t
rH •—'
<:
co *-**
CO >,
Q) cd
C "O
cd ^
bo Xi
C r-l
S^
c
0 x-v
tl >S
M cd
T)
|-_j **«s.
cd xi
•LJ r-l
O ^^
H
S~\
>
jj- cd
id "O
M-l ^
i-l XI
3 1-1
CO v-'
CO *~*
CO >s
r-i co n)
cd C 13
4J T3 ^-
O rl X>
H flj r-l
W ^
U
<0 >,^v
25 w >•>
•H cd
rH 13 T3
cd VH ^^
4J y xi
O < r-l
H ^
cu
bo
I-l
i— 1 rt /~s
cd xi e
4J CJ (X
O co bO
H -H "^-^
Q
CO
M-l CU
O 0
rl
• 3
0 0
E5 CO
V
(X
>-,
H
CO
o
l-l
o
co
vO O
CO
o
vO
rsi
r-l O
CSI
CM
O
1-1
m oo
o -*
oo
n
r~-
fO
-0 -H
.U C J-) 4J
14-1 Cd M-l U
. fl Xi -H cd
L fl) rl ^^
Q ^ Q
r^- r^ O CTN
o r~- o
r-l r-l
vO vO O O\
CM CM CO
CO O r-l CM
O o r~
r-l .
VO <)• CM l^>
O CM
CO .^v /"N C ^^ CO"O
S*o co *o o T3 i— i co
0) C CO -HO) -H C
•rl C -rl C 4J C &, O
So So n) o -a
•O tJ C T3 CO C
D- C 4JC -HC COcd
•Hn) i*-icd ,Qcd 3X1
J-iXS cdXl EXl MHO)
•u cd x3 cd 5 cd 0)^-*
CO ^ CO ^^ CJ ^^ f2
c*
o
ON
0
vD
ro
r-^
00
in
i— i
i
CM
vO
vO
M
r>-
<)•
o>
i^
ON
Ft
O
CM
-------
POLLUTICB ABATEMENT
As shown In Table 16, abandoned drift mines are the principal
pollution sources within the Conemaugh River main stem and minor
tributaries study area. There are also several major sources of
mine drainage pollution emanating from other source types. Similar to
the main stem Kiskiminetas River, abatement of mine drainage sources in
this study area would be of minimal value due to the massive amounts
of mine drainage which are discharged to the Little Conemaugh River,
Stony Creek, Blacklick Creek, and Two Lick Creek. Significant reduction
or even complete elimination of mine drainage in this study area would
result in an insignificant water quality improvement in the main stem
Conemaugh River. For this reason pollution abatement activities are
justified only at such a time when consideration can be given to a
total river basin abatement program, or as the final phase of an
abatement program which has achieved drainage control on a downstream
priority basis. However, abatement of a single source ot mine complex
within the study area may have merit as a demonstration site for the
feasibility study of a particular mine drainage abatement problem.
Based on the initial field survey sampling program, six of the
total 36 discharging sties contributed about 87 percent of the total
acid load measured in the study area. The combined acid load of these
sources was more than 15 tons per day. Assuming previous or concurrent
abatement of upstream discharges and similar abatement of the major
discharge points on Blacklick Creek and Two Lick Creek, drainage
control at these six principal sites should result In a significant
128
-------
water quality improvement in the main stem Conemaugh River.
Perhaps the most significant reduction in acid load from any
single source could be attained through drainage control of the
large discharge (No. 5371) along the bank of the Conemaugh River
below the mouth of McGee Run. This single effluent discharged an
acid load of 17,5^5 Ib/day, approximately 50 percent of the total
acid load discharged by all sources.
The six principal sources mentioned above can provide a rela-
tive indication of where the major mine drainage pollution problems
occur in the study area. Detailed engineering studies conducted
during an entire water year may necessitate the consideration of
additional sources or perhaps deletion of some sources initially
considered. Until such a time, these six sources can effectively
serve as a first phase or priority in a program of drainage source
abatement.
The following is a more detailed description of the six prin-
cipal sources mentioned above. A listing of these sources is shown
in Table 17. The location of these mine sites are shown in Figure 11.
All mine sites which contributed an acid load exceeding 1500 Ib/day
are considered as principal sources.
PRINCIBVL SOURCES
Mine No. 52?8
This mine is located on Tubmill Creek approximately two miles
above the mouth of the tributary. At this point, a series of drift
openings have been developed along the coal outcrop. All but one of
these openings were dry. The one discharging opening (No. 5278) contributed
129
-------
B
rd
CO
l-i
U
61
C
*H
^
.
Q)
O
&
cD
&
CO >i i-H
•H -rH
Jj TJ
t« -t-t
4J O
3
•H ••-(
L> aL
(X,
60
^ ^*v
g& g
o o
0) r-l 61
C Pu ^
O
O
g
•H
s
o
I
H
O
Z
0)
C
•H
2
V*
CU
co
i-i
U
r—4
1-1
•H
js
3
H
oo
ON
O
CM
in
*^-
ON
O
O
vO
i— 1
v£>
CM
m
oo
i— i
0)
C
•H
4J
4-1
•H
00
r^.
CM
m
^
co
^
•H
Cd
f^
60
3
0
s
O
^j-
m
m
m
oo
ON
0
o
v^
rv
CM
f-
CM
O
O
CO
CO
C
'g
4J
U-l
w
^o
vD
en
m
(4
co
^
a
r^
60
3
n)
e
co
c
o
0
m
x^
in
t^.
i— i
m
m
00
0
o
o
f\
CM
•H
il
Q
^
f*^
Cn
m
C
3
oi
n)
2
O
O
v£>
(T)
O
0
o
m
CM
0
O
vO
O
rH
ro
CM
CM
r-l
CO
1-1
•rl
D-l
CO
CO
(4-1
cS
ro
in
m
1
C
3
o£
CO
T)
CO
&
r++.
o
CM
O
m
oo
CO
o
0
o
*\
vD
CM
m
m
-3-
r-l
•H
&J
Q)
CO
3
M-l
(S
^J.
vO
m
in
c
a
CO
co
s
o
4-1
•
•i-l
l-l
4J
"O
co
e
c
c
p
CM
vO
i— 1
in
CM
oo
CM
O
0
o
VO
1
oo
•3F
CO
1
ex
•H
4J
w
vO
vO
m
m
m
ON
-------
VICINITY MAP
SALTSBORO
FIGURE I !
CONEMAUGH RIVER. MAINSTEM AND MINOR TRIBUTE
PRINCIPAL SOUPCE LOCATION MAP
-------
an effluent of 185 gpm. The acid load carried by this effluent was
2,098 Ib/day. This discharge imparts very noticeable discoloration to
Tubmill Creek which persists over the remaining downstream length of
the stream. The small refuse area associated with this series of mine
openings suggests that the mine was limited in the extent of develop-
ment. A local resident reported that this mine intersected the workings
of a larger mine and now serves as a drainway for the larger mine.
Mine Ho. $366
The effluent from this mine is discharged from a bore hole
located along the bank of the Conemaugh River near the community of
Seward. There are actually two borehols at the site, however, the
second opening was dry. A filled shaft mine opening was located near
the discharge point but it was not determined if this mine was the
source of the borehole discharge.
Mine Ho. 5371
Mine No. 53T1 contributed the largest acid load of any mine located
in this study area. The discharge point is located along the south
"bank of the Conemaugh River immediately below the mouth of McGee Run.
The effluent was 1,710 gpm which discharged an acid load of 17,5^5 Ib/day
to the river. The discharge point is not a mine portal but rather
appears to be an area where a drainway for an underground mine has
been constructed. This drainway may represent the common discharge
point for several interconnected underground mines. Such mines could
133
-------
include' the Brenizer Mine as veil as other mines located on Stony
Run.
No. 5563
A mine refuse pile was responsible for the drainage found at
No. 5563. This refuse area is one of several associated with the
abandoned Me In tyre Mine. At the time of inspection, considerable
seepage was present along the downslope side of the refuse pile. This
cumulative seepage (12 gpm) discharged an acid load of 3>^00 Ib/day
to Neal Run. The acidity concentration of this effluent was 25,000 mg/1.
Ho. 556k
Another mine refuse pile was responsible for the drainage at
this location. This dump is located near the headwaters of Reeds
Run. There was no mine opening located in this immediate area and
it appears that the refuse was trucked from Mclntyre. The acid load
discharged by source No. 55^ was 2,079 Ib/day.
Mine No.
An acid load of 1,62? Ib/day was discharged to Altmans Run by
a small unnamed tributary which enters the stream near the small community
of Jacksonville. This unnamed tributary is located adjacent to a large
surface mined area which covers more than 100 acres. Seepage was
present along the entire downslope side of the distrubed area. There
were no major point sources of discharge, however the water quality of
the tributary was grossly degraded by the cumulative seepage from the
partially reclaimed surface mine.
13>4
-------
BIACKLICK CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
135
-------
BIACKLICK CREEK
SUMKRY AHD COHCLUSICBS
1. Blacklick Creek and its minor tributaries drain an area of 222
square miles. The entire length of main stem Blacklick Creek between
the communities of Vintondale and Blairsville is seriously polluted
as a result of coal mine discharges. Two Lick Creek, a major tributary
to Blacklick Creek, is considered as a separate sub-basin report.
2, A total of l6l discharging sources and approximately 1,675 acres
of surface mined area were investigated in the study area. Discharges
from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 3,800 gpm and totalled
nearly 36-3 million gallons per day (mgd). The total net acid load
discharged by the l6l sources was 273,073 lb/day.
3. At the time of survey, a total of ih discharges from active mines
were inventoried in the Blacklick Creek drainage area. The acid load
from these sources was 13^,M*9 lb/day, or nearly one-half of the total
acid load discharged by all l6l sources. However, the contribution
from active mines has been significantly reduced by the installation
of treatment facilities at the active mine sites.
U. Drift mines and mine refuse piles were the major sources of abandoned
mine drainage discharge in the Blacklick Creek watershed. These two
source types contributed an acid load exceeding 5^ tons per day.
Disregarding the acid load from active sources, this 5^ tons per day
acid load represented nearly 80 percent of the acid load discharged
by all abandoned sources.
136
-------
5. A total of 18 principal sources of mine drainage discharge were
located in the study area. These sources include seven drift mines,
four combination mines, four mine refuse piles, two strip mines, and
one shaft mine. These sources discharged a total net acid load of
125,120 Ib/day. This represents about 90 percent of the acid load
contributed by abandoned mines in the study area.
DESCRIFTICK OF AREA.
The North Branch of Blacklick Creek rises near the community of
Carrolltown and flows southwest toward the confluence with South Branch
Blacklick Creek near Vintondale. The North Branch drains a JO square
mile area of Indiana and Cambria Counties.
South Branch Blacklick Creek rises above the community of Revloc.
The stream is U-shaped and drains an area of k& square miles in Cambria
County. The communities of Revloc, Nanty Glo, Twin Rocks, and Vinton-
dale are located along the main stem of the South Branch.
Blacklick Creek is formed by the confluence of the North and
South Branches of Blacklick Creek near Vintondale. From this point
the stream flows generally west some 32 miles to the confluence with
the Conemaugh River near Blairsville. Between the communities of
Vintondale and Blairsville, Blacklick drains an area of 104 square
miles. This includes the drainage area of all minor tributaries but
does not include Two Lick Creek. This major drainage area is Included
in a separate sub-basin report.
.137
-------
STREAM WATER QUALITY
At the time of the mine drainage source investigation, the main
stem of North Branch Blacklick Creek vas affected by mine drainage
below the confluence of Dutch Run. The portions of the drainage area
above Dutch Run were not affected by coal mine discharges. Several
portals and airways to underground mines were located, however, these
sites did not contribute any discharge. The area of the North Branch
most serisouly affected by mine drainage was that portion of the main
stem below the confluence of Elk Creek. Elk Creek and tributaries to
Elk Creek were grossly polluted by large pump discharges from active
underground mines.
South Branch Blacklick Creek was unaffected by mine drainage
above the community of Revloc. Below this area the stream was totally
degraded by a series of pump discharges from active underground mines.
Abandoned mines in this area also contributed drainage to South Branch
Blacklick Creek.
Downstream of Vintondale, Blacklick Creek received major acid
discharges from both active and abandoned coal mines. The distribution
and magnitude of the discharges were such that the entire length of
Blacklick Creek was totally degraded by mine drainage. There was no
point along the main stem where the water quality of Blacklick Creek
was improved by alkaline tributary inflow or by dilution and neutral-
ization of the upstream discharges.
During the courseof the 1968 field study several stream locations
138
-------
TABLE 18
Stream water quality sampling stations
Blac&lick Creek
Station
No.
Sampling Periods
Stream
Location
U983
1*979
U977
U978
5201
5121
520U
1+982
U980
^976
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, Nov, 1968
June, Oct, Nov, 1968
July, Nov, 1968
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, 1968
June, Oct, Nov, 1968
Blacklick Creek
Blacklick Creek
South Branch
Blacklick Creek
North Branch
Blacklick Creek
North Branch
Blacklick Creek
Elk Creek
South Branch
Blacklick Creek
Aulds Run
Ramsey Run
Unnamed trib to
Blacklick Creek
USGS gage @ Josephine
Relow confluence of
North Branch and
South Branch
Near mouth
Near mouth
Above mouth of Elk Cr.
Near Mouth
At Rt. U22
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
139
-------
ON .
«:•§
H f*
<«
4J rH
H g,
1
.0
01 rH
4J
ctf
rH
3 rH
CO -v.
ff
.X
*"s.
m .a
W f»
0)
I
rl
«rH
IP
X iX
JJ it)
•H T3
•H X)
JT
rH
tri
V rH
o \
H tf
eciflc
uctance
£1
-l £
cn
I r =
ON lA if\
-* «A sO
SO O CO
lA CM -*
fl CM
O r*-. o
r^ o NO
CM tA CM
fi r- ON
ON ON CM
en ON en
rH fl CM
ft CM m
tA lA
CM o or~
O Q 00
lO O rH
oo CM cn
rH CM
SSS
Ul
o
Sz t
ON rH Q
SON 5
1-1 CM
oo CM cn
00 l~ Os
f*. so m
r- m r»
§r» CM
CM CM
cn 01 oo
m so «*
m o «-i
m fi o
O ON C*«
m o cn
Cn rH rH
m NO o
r* CM m
O 00 CM
cn IM cn
o •* cn
Sen ON
r~ CM
oo m oo
rH r*. NO
CM
OO 0
CM NO CM
rH l-H rH
O •* CM
•-••A It
Sf» rH
CM
m 00 rH
CM rH m
O CM CM
m cn ON
CM CM m
oo o •»
CM m m
rH
mom
CM O ON
rH rH rH
III
CN cn CM
00 00 ^
CM CM lA
0 O en
Q CM ft
lA CM iA
ON en cn
CO 00 00
#sC so
ON ON
3-1
CM
At r
r^ m
O> CM
O CM
«~
-» r-.
•* O
rH
m *a*
CM cn
sO 00
rH 5F
rH
m o
rH CM
SO ON
00 00
S3
m o
CM
o o
CM ON
rH rH
oo m
m r^
m o
•* 5
so CM
H
rH1 >
9 0
~> X
in t
to CM CM
•* CM rH
m •» cn
O r~ CM
cn CM CM
m 00 r»
Sm cn
-* so
so oo m
SO 00 •*
rH
r«. cn CM
CM rH rH
m m -»
CM cn m
•* 00 •»
SO NO l»
* m cn
-» 00 ON
rH
O O O
in a r*
•» NO rH
rH rH CM
so op m
WrHrH
m m so
o
CM CM CM
800 m
t- m
cn 1-1
rH
HI
Hi
|IS
so in co
m in o
cn m cn
moo
rH rH O
0 O O
Sm NO
CM NO
ON ON 4
rH CM CM
O m so
in O rH
in rH CM
O m o
32"°
gss
M rH
lA CM «*
r^ en ON
cn r- ft
NO CM CM
ON tA ft
en CM oo
rH
-------
-------
were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 18). These stations were
selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine drainage. A summary
of this stream data is presented in Table 19* The locations of the
sampling points are shown in Figure 12.
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
An estimated 275 mining sites and approximately 1,675 acres of
surface mined area vere investigated during this study. Samples for
chemical analysis were collected from l6l sources discharging at the
time of the survey. The total effluent from these sources was more
than 25 thousand gallons per minute (gpm) or over 36 million gallons
per day (mgd). The total net acid load discharged to Blacklick Creek
(excluding Two Lick Creek) was over 136 tons per day.
A description of the mine drainage sources follows. All mine
site locations in the Blacklick Creek study area are shown in Figure 13'
NORTH BRANCH BIACKLICK CREEK
All of the mine discharges located on this tributary resulted from
active underground mines. These effluents were discharged to Elk
Creek, Dutch Run, and tributaries to Elk Creek. A surface mine was
in operation along the very headwaters of the North Branch, however,
the mine was dry.
Elk Greek
The Colver Mine, operated by Eastern Associated Coal Corporation,
-------
Is located near the headwaters of Elk Creek. At the time of survey
the Colver Mine discharged an untreated effluent of 3,222 gpm (No. 5125).
The acid load carried by this discharge approached 10 tons per day.
The Colver Mine has Installed treatment facilities since the 1968 survey.
According to recent (1971) information supplied by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources this treatment results in a
final effluent exhibiting a net alkalinity. However, at this time
the iron concentration often exceeds the permissible maximum and
additional upgrading of the facility will be required. The present
discharge point Is now located approximately one mile vest of the
original bore hole discharge point No. 5125. An acid effluent was
also collected at the base of the large refuse dump associated vith
the Colver Mine (No. 472*0.
A second major active mine effluent vas discharged to Crooked
Run, a tributary to Elk Creek. This effluent (No. 5012) is located
at Duman Lake Bark and results from the Lancashire Mines of Barnes
and Tucker Coal Company. At the time of sampling the effluent vas
3,800 gpm and carried an acid load of more than 22 tons per day. For
a period of time this effluent discharged to the Susquehanna River
drainage after a breakthrough near the community of Barnesboro. This
diversion of discharge required a massive in-stream neautralization
effort by Pennsylvania in order to minimize the deleterious water
quality effects upon the West Branch Susquehanna River. At the pre-
sent time the effluent has been eliminated from the Susquehanna
drainage and again discharges to Crooked Creek from the Duman Lake
Park bore holes. Treatment facilities are presently in operation at
1*3
-------
the Duman lake site.
Dutch Run
Two additional borehole discharges from the Barnes and Tucker
Mines were located on Dutch Run. No. 5010 vas located approximately
one mile northwest of Duman Lake and No. 5011 was located near Stiles
Crossing. The present location of these borehole discharges may differ
from those originally found. However, according to the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources, these remaining Barnes and
Tucker discharges are treated and comply with the required effluent
standards.
Sampling was conducted at several stream locations on North
Branch Blacklick Creek coincident with the mine inventory. These
sample points were located near the mouth of North Branch (No. kS^Q),
near the mouth of Elk Creek (No. 5121), and on the North Branch above
Elk Creek (No. 5201). This water quality data is shown in Table 18.
SOUTH BRANCH BIACKLICK CREEK
Revloc Area
The South Branch of Blacklick Creek was unaffected by mine drain-
age above the community of Revloc. The only indication of a mine op-
eration in this area was an operating air fan for an underground mine.
The pH of the stream above Revloc remained above 7.^ and the conduc-
tivity was less than 150 micromhos/cm.
Mine refuse dumps associated with the Revloc No. 32 mine in the
-------
community of Revloc contributed significant amounts of highly
mineralized drainage to the South Branch. These two dumps covered
approximately 38 acres and contributed an acid load of 1,057 Ib/day to
the South Branch. Four samples were collected and each represent
cumulative seepage around the perimeter of the refuse areas. (No.'s
^3, ^5^, ^5, ^6). The pH of the South Branch was 4.0 below
the mine dumps.
The experimental treatment facility of the Bethlehem Mines
Corporation was located approximately one mile below (downstream)
of Revloc. At this point the drainage from the Revloc No. 32 Mine
and the Cambria Slope No. 33 Mine was pumped to the surface via
bordhole. At the time of inspection this experimental facility
was treating 1,200 gpm by use of lime neutralization. An additional
effluent of approximately 2,000 gpm was by-passing the treatment
facility and discharged to the South Branch. At the time of sampling
(1968) the treated effluent was alkaline (778 Ib/day, No. 5188) while
the untreated portion of the effluent carried an acid load of more
than 6.5 tons per day (No. 5187).
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports
(1971) that this facility has been expanded to a full scale treatnent
plant and now provides treatment for the entire discharge from the
No. 32 *»d No. 33 Mines. The alkaline effluent from this plant nay
exceed as much as 6 mgd.
The Cambria No. 33 Slope Mine is located outside the Blacklick
Creek drainage area on a tributary to the Little Conemaugh River.
1U5
-------
However, the entire effluent from this mine is pumped to the facility
below Revloc for treatment.
Nanty Glo area
The next downstream source of mine drainage discharge on the
South Branch was located near the community of Nanty Glo. The
Bethlehem Mines Corporation Nanty Glo Mine No. 31 is located in
this community. The discharge from this mine is via borehole
approximately one mile from the mine. At the time of inspection,
a discharge of 2,700 gpm was measured at this site. The acid load
discharged to the South Branch was more than 18 tons per day (No.
5189). The iron load from this discharge exceeded four tons per
day. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports
(1971) that facilities are now under construction for treatment of
this effluent.
There are two mine refuse dumps associated with the Nanty Glo
No. 31 Mine. These two dumps cover an area of approximately 6k
acres. Both mine dumps are located along a small unnamed tribu-
tary of the South Branch. Considerable seepage was present at
the base of the piles and the cumulative result of this seepage
was the complete water quality degradation of the tributary. Below
the southernmost pile, the stream carried an acid load exceeding
17.5 tons per day (No. 5037). Seepage points from the other pile
contributed an additional acid load of 2,6HU Ib/day to the unnamed
tributary as well as a 1,015 Ib/day load directly to the South
Branch (No.'s 5039 and 50^0).
1U6
-------
Two small discharging abandoned drift mines were located in
the Nanty Glo area (Mine No.'s 5035 and 50*4-3); however, these
mines contributed only negligible acid loads.
Mine No. U?95 was the only site discharging a significant
acid load to the South Branch between Nanty Glo and the down-
stream community of Twin Rocks. At Mine No. U?95 a total effluent
of 100 gpm, emanated from three caved drift openings. The acid
load carried by this effluent was 186 Ib/day.
Twin Rocks area
A large refuse pile and several drift mine openings were
located adjacent to the South Branch immediately south of Twin
Rocks. At the time of inspection, there was no drainage from
the mine openings or from the refuse area. Several drift mine
openings and two surface mines were located on Coalpit Run, a
tributary which joins the South Branch in Twin Rocks. Mine No.
5079 discharged an acid load of 227 Ib/day to the headwaters of
Coalpit Run. An additional load of 3H Ib/day was discharged to
the tributary by the refuse pile (No. 5080) associated with this
drift mine. Downstream of these discharges, an abandoned surface
mine (No. 5082) contributed an acid load of 159 Ib/day.
The Twin Rocks Mine of the Johnstown Coal and Coke Company
was located near the lower reach of Coalpit Run, At the time of
sampling, this active mine (No. 5009) had an alkaline discharge.
-------
It has been reported that this mine is now sealed and abandoned.
Vintondale area
A series of drift openings and several surface mines were
located along both banks of the South Branch in the vicinity of
Vintondale. Mine No. k^kz was the only active operation. This
mine was operated by the Yinton Coal Company. An acid load of
1,827 Ib/day was discharged by this mine. However, according to
the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, the opera-
tors are not responsible for the acid discharge and, therefore, not
required to supply treatment.
Stream sampling conducted coincident with the mine drainage
survey showed that South Branch Blacklick Creek near the mouth
carried an acid load ranging from 7.5 tons per day (low flow con-
ditions) to 82 tons per day (high flow conditions).
BIACKLICK CREEK, BEIDW VINTONDALE
A large refuse pile is located adjacent to Blacklick Creek
approximately 0.3 mile below the confluence of the North and
South Branches of Blacklick Creek at Vintondale. Two open shaft
entries and one sealed slope entry were located within the refuse
area. It was reported that this mine closed in 1929- Two small
hillside springs and one small unnamed tributary are directed
across this large refuse dump before entering Blacklick Creek.
1U8
-------
As a result, these drainages are affected by the waste material.
These sources (No.'s UyUS, kjkk, and V7^5) carried a combined
acid load of 962 Ib/day At the points where they entered Black-
lick Creek. A much larger tributary is also diverted through
the refuse dump near the downstream limit of the refuse pile.
The acid load measured near the mouth of this tributary ranged
from 219 Ib/day to 63? Ib/day (No. U9?6, Table 19).
Two additional open shaft entries, reportedly interconnected
with the openings mentioned above, were found in the abandoned
mining community of Wehrum. A sixth opening, also reported as
interconnected, is located approximately 0.6 mile downstream of
Wehrum. At this site, a 1,020 gpm artesian effluent was dis-
charged to Ramsey Run, a direct tributary of Blacklick Creek.
This shaft (Mine No. b7h6) contributed an acid load in excess of
5.5 tons per day to the receiving stream.
Rummel Run
A total of four surface mines and lU drift mine openings
were located within the Rummel Run drainage area. Mine No. U851
was a small active drift mine operated by the B. & J. Coal Co.
A negligible acid load was discharged by the mine. The operator
is not responsible for the discharge and the Department of En-
vironmental Resources does not require treatment of the discharge.
1U9
-------
.The major portion of the mine drainage discharged to Rummel Run
resulted from an area which has been mined by both surface and under-
ground methods. A total of four effluents were located at this site
(No. U853, W5U, H855, W56). The combined acid load from this com-
plex was 718 Ib/day.
Mardis Run
Five surface mines and two abandoned drift mines were located
within the Mardis Run drainage area. All of these operations were
dry.
Blacklick Creek, Dilltown to Bias - Southbank
This area has been extensively mined by both surface and under-
ground mining methods. The majority of the mines are located ad-
jacent to the main stem of Blacklick Creek.
Two caved mine openings were located along the south bank of
Blacklick Creek west of Dilltown. Mine No. U857 contributed an acid
discharge of 1,138 Ib/day and Mine No. ^858 discharged a load of
nearly 19 tons per day. The original opening at Mine No, 1*858 has
been sealed; however, the 960 gpm effluent has broken through the
hillside adjacent to the seal. This drainage cascades over a 20
foot embankment into Blacklick Creek.
One abandoned mine discharge and two refuse pile discharges
were located along the south bank of this portion of Blacklick Creek.
150
-------
.Mine No. 1*859 discharged to Mardis Run. The discharge is artesian
and probably results from a point of breakthrough from one of the
nearby underground mines. .The acid load was l,lUl Ib/day. The
two refuse pile discharges (No.'s 1*860, 1+861) contributed an ad-
ditional acid load of 150 Ib/day.
Two active underground mine operations were located along this
section of Blacklick Creek. They were the Bias Mine of the Armaugh
Coal Company and the Blacklick Mine of the Florence Mining Company.
Neither mine was discharging at the time of inspection. It has
been reported that these mines are now interconnected with other
Florence Mining Company operations located along the Conemaugh
River near the new Conemaugh River power plant.
Blacklick Creek, Dilltown to Dias - Northbank
Mine No. 1*71*8 contributed an effluent of 60 gpm to a small
unnamed tributary of Blacklick Creek just below Dilltown. There
were actually two openings at this site. One was caved and dry
while the second opening discharged the 60 gpm effluent. The acid
load was Ul8 Ib/day.
A total of five discharge points were recorded along a 1.5
mile contour surface mine located adjacent to Mine No. 1*7^8. Sev-
eral drift mine openings were located within this surface mined
area. The five discharge points resulted from old mine openings as
well as from surface impoundments adjacent to the highwall. The com-
bined acid load from these sources (No.'s 1*870, 1*871, 1*872, 1*873, and
WO was 395 Ib/day.
151
-------
There were five additional surface mines downstream of the area
described above. Several minor acid discharges were recorded from
cumulative seepage vhlch occurred at the "base of the spoil piles.
Four major sources of acid discharge were also associated with these
surface mines. These were Mine No.'s 11863, 1*366, 4868 and 4869. The
combined acid load was 6,651 Ib/day.
An underground mine was under development near the headwaters of
the unnamed tributary on which the mines described above are located.
This mine had not begun production at the time of inspection. This
mine is now operated by the Oneida Mining Company and produces an
alkaline discharge.
Blacklick Creek, Dias to Heshbon - Southbank
Eleven drift mine openings and three surface mines were located
along the south bank of Blacklick Creek in the Dias to Heshbon area.
Only four of these mines were discharging and the acid loads were
minor. The only major source of mine drainage pollution (No. 5571)
was contributed by drainage from an abandoned mine refuse dump located
on Ramsey Run. The 12 gpm effluent from the mine dump area carried
an acid load of 4,709 Ib/day. The acidity concentration of this highly
mineralized effluent was 32,700 mg/1.
Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Ramsey Run coincident
with source investigation. At this time Ramsey Run discharged an
acid load ranging from 1,122 Ib/day to 7>9^0 Ib/day to Blacklick Creek
(Table 19).
152
-------
Blacklick Creek, Dias to Heshbon - Northbank
An active coal preparation plant was located on the north bank
of Blacklick Creek immediately vest of Route 56 at Dias. This faci-
lity served the numerous active mine operations in the surrounding
area. An abandoned surface mine is located on the hillside immedi-
ately above the preparation plant. Almost the entire area of the
surface mine has been filled with waste material from the plant.
Water discharged by the surface mine, possibly from underground
origin, passes around and through the somewhat compacted material.
The acid loads carried by'these effluents (No.'s k&fQ and 1*879)
were 115 Ib/day and 6U8 Ib/day, respectively.
Mine No. ^889 contributed the only remaining significant acid
discharge in the Dias to Heshbon area. The two caved openings to
this mine are located on the bank of Blacklick Creek east of Hesh-
bon. The measured effluent was hO gpm which carried an acid load
of 360 Ib/day.
Blacklick Creek, Heshbon to Josephine - Southbank
This portion of the Blacklick Creek drainage area has been ex-
tensively mined by both surface and underground mining methods. Sur-
face mines have disturbed several hundred acres and many of these
sites are associated with drift mines. Forty-four of the mines had
measurable discharges at the time of the inventory. However, only
Mine Wo.'s ^836, 5018 and 5026 contributed significant acid discharges.
Mine No. ^836 is located near the headwaters of a small unnamed
tributary of Blacklick Creek. At the time of survey, the 85 gpm effluent
153
-------
from'this mine represented the entire flow of the tributary. The
acid load was 5^1 Ib/day.
A 250 gpm effluent was measured at the base of the slumped drift
opening at Mine No. 5018. This opening is one of several situated
along both banks of the small receiving tributary. The acid load
was 1,170 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5026 discharged an acid load of 3,^67 Ib/day to an
unnamed tributary. There are four other drift mine openings in the
immediate area, all of which contributed additional acid discharges.
Blacklick Creek, Heshbon to Josephine-Northbank
The major mining activity in this area is centered around Aulds
Run, a tributary to Blacklick Creek. The largest acid load found in
this area was discharged by the abandoned L.C.S. Collieries Virginia
No. Ik Mine. The effluent was ^05 gpm which carried an acid load of
nearly 5 tons per day (Mine No. if-890). An acitve drift mine operated
by the Sunny Creek Coal Company was located along the west side of
Aulds Run. The kO gpm effluent from this operation underwent lime
neutralization and settlement prior to discharge to Aulds Run. At
the time of sampling the Sunny Creek Mine (No. 1*895) discharged a
negligable acid load.
Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Aulds Run coincident
with the source investigation. At this time Aulds Run discharged an
acid load ranging from 3-5 tons per day to 6.2 tons per day to Blacklick
Creek (Table 19).
-------
A coal preparation plant is located along the north bank of
Blacklick Creek near the mouth of Aulds Run. Waste material from
this plant is trucked to the unreclaimed strip mine cuts on the
hillside overlooking Blacklick Creek. These surface mines have
also intersected underground workings from the Virginia No. lU Mine
mentioned above. Drainage from the underground workings and/or the
surface mines percolate through the waste material deposited in the
pits. Highly mineralized seepage areas occurred in many areas even
after the previously unreclaimed strip mine spoil piles were back-
filled over the pyritic materials. As a result, it is quite diffi-
cult to determine the original origin of some of the effluents sampled
during the study. The largest of these discharges was No. kQ$8 which
carried an acid load of 5,220 Ib/day. Another three gpm effluent from
a refuse filled strip pit had an acidity concentration of 6l,250 mg/1
with an acid load of 2,205 Ib/day (No. U897).
Mine No. U922 discharged an acid load of 719 Ib/day to Laurel
Run, a tributary to Blacklick Creek downstream of Aulds Run. This
sealed mine is located at the headwaters of the tributary. Surface
and underground mine openings were located along both banks of
Laurel Run immediately below Mine No. U922. However, these mines con-
tributed only minor acid loads. The largest acid load in the Laurel
Run drainage area resulted from a borehole discharge of the Virginia
No. 20 Mine operated by Crichton Coal and Coke. A 1,710 gpm effluent
from this mine discharged an acid load of 2,565 Ib/day to Laurel Run.
This mine is presently reported as inactive. The status of the dis-
charge is unknown.
-------
Laurel Run received two additional mine drainage discharges from
a large surface mined area on the north bank of the tributary. These
were discharge Ho.'s 5015 and 5016 with acid loads of 19^ Ib/day and
961 Ib/day, respectively.
The active Josephine Mine of the Willowbrook Coal Company was
the last downstream operation in the area of north bank Blacklick
Creek from Heshbon to Josephine. During the survey period, the
450 gpm effluent from the Josephine Mine received inadequate treat-
ment. The acid load at this time was 1,863 Ib/day (Mine Mo. 5152).
Upgraded treatment facilities have been installed but the present
status of the effluent is unknown.
Blacklick Creek. Josephine to Mouth -South Bank
The last area of mining activity on the south side of Blacklick
Creek occurred along several unnamed tributaries northwest of the
junction of Routes 22 and 119. A total of lU discharging mine sites
were located in this small area. The total source acid load was more
than 2,500 Ib/day. The 65 gpm effluent from Mine Ho. 1*910 discharged
l,UVf Ib/day of the 2,500 Ib/day total load.
Blacklick Creek, Josephine to Mouth - North Bank
Coal mining operations on the north side of Blacklick Creek were
confined to Muddy Run and an unnamed tributary adjacent to Muddy Run.
A total of lU drift mine openings were found in these two areas. Five
of these were discharging at the time of Inspection. The combined
acid load was 262 Ib/day. Mine Ho. 1*273 discharged 118 Ib/day of this
262 Ib/day total source acid load.
156
-------
Active Mines
Daring the course of the field inventory, a total of Ik dis-
charges from active nines were sampled in the Blacklick Creek
drainage area. Updated information (1971), supplied by the Penn-
sylvania Department of Environmental Resources, indicated that
treatment facilities are presently in operation at all but one
active discharge site in the watershed. The one exception is the
Bethlehem Mines Corporation Nanty Glo Ho. 31 Mine. However, treat-
ment facilities are under construction at this time.
Two discharges were associated with the Virginia No. 20 Mine
operated by Crichton Coal and Coke. These were discharge Ho.'s U^Ul
and U98l. Nearly the entire 2,573 lb/day acid load was contributed
by No. 1*981. This mine is reportedly closed and the present status
of the discharges is unknown.
Mine No. 5009 operated by the Johnstown Coal and Coke Company
has closed since the date of inventory. The mine is now abandoned and
sealed.
Mine No. 1*5^2 is a drift mine operated by the Vinton Coal Company.
This mine discharged an acid load of 1,827 lb/day at the time of survey.
However, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources reports
that this mine operates in previously abandoned workings and, provided
no increase in pollutional load occurs, is not required to supply treat-
ment. Mine No. U831 is also exempted from supplying treatment. The
acid load from this mine at the time of survey was negligible (51b/day).
157
-------
A total of 161 discharging sources and approximately 1,675 acres
of surface mined area were investigated during this study. Table 20
presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading
(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams in
the Blacklick Creek study area. Table 21 presents a sunmary of flow
volumes and chemical loading by source type for the l6l discharging
sources inventoried during the study.
158
-------
B
cd
4J
CO
oo
C T3
T2.S
•H CO
Q) (-1
U (U
24J
cd
O >N
CM Xl r^
0)
W CO 0)
tJ 60 J-l
M CO
3 £
H "O .M
SO
•H
r-l r-l
y/
CO O
bO cd
C ^
•H
cd
rl
0)
C
•S
•H -9
E*l ^v
4J Ct
cd *C
MH ^
r-l XI
3 1-1
CO ^
CO x->
r-l CO >
cd
•H cd
r~f *T3 *C
Cd VI •*>
•U O XI
O «C i-l
H ^
0)
bO
•-« fco
cd cd B
•u xi O
o o H
H co v-'
•H
Q
H-l CO
O
•rl
0)
U
s
CM oo CM o r*»
in >* r-l r-l «*
,
in *^ ^^ *d* in
\o o
r-l r-l
CO CO -* CO CM
r*- co ON
CM VO
m 1-4
co co oo C"*N ^^
ON in CSI vo 00
ft ft ft
CM O i-l
vO CM
r-i r^ in co o
00 ON CO vO O
o i-i co CM m
ft «
o *^*
rH
r»» oo h» !"» vo
CM CO <* r-t 00
vO O CM CM t^.
ft ft
m vo
«* r-l
m co o CM vo
Io m CM co
ft ft
CM CM
m r^ *^ vo r^*
CM in
O & t3
OO OONQ 00 CO CM ONcOf^^TvDCM vO 00
i-ION CM1? 00 CO 00 ON COr-l i— i oo m •d'^' r~> oo
f^O d'«d'ONCo
r-i i— i i— i r^ *^* i— i i— i r^
CM
ONCM CMCOON vo v 3 i-l |4 i-l r-t to ±> Q) 3 O
0)tl!X(l>ia*rl 0) T) Q) g UV4JU P-i I-l 0) CUr-l CO
B 3 « B B."O wB'-i6BxlcdB3cdx! u.MxJS'-' J
SCdCOnJcdr-4tt}cd3cd34Jr-ICdOi-HCOi-l OOCd*H
-------
FIGURE 13
•m BLACKUCK CREEK
MINE LOCATION,1 MAP
-------
0)
(X
4J
0)
o -d
3 tfj
O CO
CO I-l
(U
>-. 4J
xt m
CO
00 ^
(3 CU
•H 0)
-d i>
td o
o
f— 1 _i(J
u
0) v4
60r-4
a-s
•H td
n) I-H
P pq
•d
S
s
i?
C n)
•H -d
1 x7
rH iH
< ^
CU *~.
CQ >•
84
td ^v
C .-H
!~
C
O /->
H n)
r-4 "V,
td *^
4J i-H
O ^
EH
Q) *->
3.3
r-4 *v.
3 X)
01 i-4
CO s-\
ta >
i-H Q) Jtf
n) C *d
4J TJ ^
0 IH XI
ffi ^™"'
4J *-»
•s w td
•H "d
cd «H xi
•U CJ i-H
O <• N>
H
0)
00
cd Si g
O 0 (X
H in >_<
•H
Q
m co
O 0)
y
Jj
Z OJ
CU
Q-<
Es
ource T
C/l
O CO CM ON
i-H r-4 CO m
^
co CM os r*
m CM co m
CM
i-H
r** in vo vo
m CM CM ON
«* CM >* •>
» "CM
ON i-H
in Is* ON vO
*^ ' *I^ i-H *^/
co • co r^ r^*
CM vO VD CO
00 »-H
m ON vo co
o co co r^
CM r^ o t^
•* *» •* •»
CO CM CM i-H
i-H
VO CM 00 i-H
•* 0 -* 0
^*J ^^ ^T ^O
M * A ft
I-H co m co
\o «-<
O i-l CM CO
r-i co co in
Is** px. i-^ CD
M ** *»
CO i-H i-H
•**t CUC O C
CO CO) CO v4O
d"? 5J1* £"2 4J'S
£s s^ 2s s§
4J XI 4J U O 1H
•H •-"
II ,_l
U O
cd cd
m
0)
r4. jj
1
e
» 4J
>s cd
0) CU
^ ^
H U
3
W <4H
O
00
VO C
ON O
rH »fH
•y
%
O i-H
i-H JJ
c
h Cd
aramete
ignific
PH a
*
163
-------
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
As shown in Table 21, active shaft mines were the principal pollution
sources within the Blacklick Creek drainage area. The 273,073 Ib/day
acid load shown in the table reflects the mine drainage conditions found
during the 1968 survey. The contribution from active shaft or slope
mines represents nearly one half of the total source acid load measured
at all l6l mine discharge points (Table 21).
A more realistic estimation of the mine drainage problem in the
Blacklick Creek area may be obtained by deleting the contribution from
all active sources (shaft or slope mines and drift mines). The contribu-
tion from active mines has been significantly reduced by the installation
of treatment facilities at many of the mines. Completion of treatment
facilities at any mine not presently providing treatment, coupled with
adequate state regulatory control should reduce to a minimum the unabated
mine drainage contribution from active sites in the Blacklick Creek
watershed.
For discussion purposes only the total source acid load from abandoned
mine sites will be considered. The abandoned source acid load at the
time of survey was 138,62U Ib/day (Table 21, total source acid load less
active acid load).
Based on the initial field survey sampling program, l8 of the total
l6l discharging sites contributed about 90 percent of the total acid load
from abandoned mines measured in the study area. These sources included
seven drift mines, four refuse pile areas, three strip mines, two
combination surface-underground mines, and one shaft mine. The combined
acid load discharged by these 18 sites was 125,120 Ib/day.
16U
-------
Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement program
in Blacklick Creek should include the 18 sources mentioned above.
Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites would be expected
to contribute significant acid discharges. Detailed engineering
studies and mine effluent sampling conducted during an entire water
year would more accurately characterize the relative contribution of
each source, JDue to the magnitude of each discharge, it would be
expected that even when considered over a longer time period, each
site would remain a Major contributor. However, long term repeti-
tive water quality determinations may necessitate the consideration
of additional sourcet located elsewhere in the basin.
The 18 principal sources (listed in Table 22) located during
this initial survey provide a relative indication as to where the
major mine drainage problems occur in the Blacklick Creek watershed.
Until such a time when additional study can provide a more detailed
assessment of the problem, these 18 sources can effectively serve
as the first phase or priority in a program of drainage source abate-
ment in the Blacklick Creek watershed. Once drainage control has been
established at the principal source sites, the abatement program could
be expanded to include additional discharge points.
The following is a description of the 18 principal sources. A
listing of these sources is shown in Table 22. The locations of
these mine sites are shown in Figure lU. In the Blacklick Creek
watershed, all sites which contributed an acid load exceeding
900 Ib/day are considered as principal sources.
165
-------
0}
fl)
O
H TJ
p fl)
O pd
to to
d) d>
co ts
C !>
OJ -rl
OJ co M
prl »Q fll
n *
t— 1 H
pq
0)
o
0)
PS
..
in .0
T) H
o
«al H
g)
"
0)
0
o d
•H CO
•rl O
O P
p, d
co o
o
*
I-N
O 0
r— | Q|
(x, S
0)
d
s
VH
o
«
^
0) •
fl !Z
A
it M ^ ^ j^ ^
o o o o o u
PS OOO P §OOO
•H -H -H PS PS -H -H iH
^% rS rH rH rH ( — 1 i — 1 rH
0) Mr^^j CQ MAir^rM O
w ooo -a -dooo
B cococo r-f rHcOcdco pi4
a HHH P pHHH 0
PS pq CQ cq <; <;pqpqpq .H
Jbj O J^ r&4 OOO O »M O O O O O .^
CU-PCUO) -P -P -P -PCU-P-P-P-P-PO
0) 0) 0) . Q) CO
^4 ^* h ^ f^ *^ f^ O J^ O O C^ O O |— f
^ ^J rJij ^4 pS 4^ 40 4-> d -P p!xj -P -P -P ooiAirvoooiAoir\o
VO OJ CO \O CO ON 00 ON U"N O l/N O IfN ON CO l/N
t/NONHOJIArHOJUNOOOJOCOOOlAH
HCOHHrHHOJOHONH U)
OJ VO OJ
8OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOlTvOOOOOOOO
VOCOOlTNOl/NOt— OOOOl/NJ--*VOO
HOJPOI-JJ-OOVOOO-*ONOJOOJHHCO
00 OJ
-=tVOOJOO-=frOOt— OJUNOOOJHt— OJOOC—
rooo_a-oocooooo^ojojoJOJOJOJOJOj
l/NOOOOOOOUNl/NOOir\UNOOO
OOOJOOVOVOOOOJONO HVOlfNJ-OO
H O ON H H J* OJ ITN-*
H
tu cy a, cu
d d d 0
tU iM !S tM
co d d d d g.(H'i.H'd'»H'iri^!5^
PSWQQQCJQUOCQCQOOQQP3
UNVOt— 00 ONVOOO ONOOOt~-OO OOOVO I—
^f-a-l/NlfNlAVOVOSPONONONONHHOJCO
t— t-oooooocoeococooococo ONO o o
-3* -3* -^* ^ •& *zt ^ ^3" Jy1 *zt -& -^ ^ l/N l/N l/N
•
£4
o
0
•H
O 2
-P O
co
^^ Ort
•H W
4^ ,f3
O
g 3
l]
OO
°
OJ
o
o
CO
r-T
OJ
O
O
OO
3
O\
H
00
0)
H
•H
PH
2
^
P?
VO
0
I/N
rt
3
PS
s?
1
ON
O
t-
-*
O
O
t~^
04
00
O
0
O
l/N
H
VO
OJ
OJ
H
0)
H
•H
PH
3
-------
SOURCES
Site No.
The origin of this acid discharge is not a mine site. At this
location) a small unnamed tributary is diverted around and through
an extensive mine refuse area prior to entering Blacklick Creek.
In addition to the 90? Ib/day acid load contributed at this site,
there are similar discharges along the entire length of the refuse
area which lies adjacent to Blacklick Creek.
Mine No.
The abandoned shaft mine discharge is located approximately 0.6
mile downstream of the abandoned mining community of Wehrum. The
discharge point is the sixth shaft opening in a series of reportedly
interconnected shaft mines along Blacklick Creek from Vintondale to
the Wehrum area. All five upstream openings were dry. The discharge
from Mine No. kjk6 was 1,020 gpm and carried an acid load of 11,322
Ib/day. Three of the five additional entries are located in the
vicinity of the large refuse pile downstream of Vintondale and the
remaining two entries are located in Wehrum.
Mine No.
An 80 gpm effluent was measured at the base of the slumped
drift opening to Mine No. 1*857. A contour surface mine is located im-
mediately adjacent to the opening but has not intersected the face of
the portal.
16?
-------
However-, this surface mine has intersected and partially destroyed
or covered several additional underground mine openings which
probably interconnect with Mine No. ^857. The acid load discharged
to Blacklick Creek by Mine No. U857 was 1,138 Ib/day.
Mine No. U858
This mine opening is located approximately 650 yards downstream
of Mine No. ^857 at the same elevation along the southbank of Black-
lick Creek. The original opening of Mine No. U858 had been sealed.
However, the 960 gpm effluent has broken through the hillside adjacent
to the seal. The drainage cascades over a 20 foot embankment into
Blacklick Creek. The acid load contributed by Mine No. 1*858 was
37,555 Ib/day.
Mine No. U859
This mine is located approximately 0.5 mile above the mouth of
Mardlis Run. Contour surface mines and drift mines are situated
along both banks of Marldis Run in the vicinity of the No. U859 dis-
charge. The effluent is artesian and probably results from a point
of breakthrough from one of the ambient mines. The acid load was
1,11*1 Ib/day.
Mine No. W366
Mine No. k&66 contributed an effluent of 180 gpm which carried
an acid load of 2,570 Ib/day. Several drift mine openings are located
in the highwall of this contour surface mine. Heavy rainfall and high
flow conditions at the time of sampling were partly attributable for
the large volume of discharge (180 gpm).
168
-------
CONCUAUSH RIVl
FIGURE 14
BLACKUCK CREEK
PRINCIPAL SOURCE LOCATION MAP
-------
Mine No. ^868
The 120 gpra effluent measured at this mine flows from the base of
a slumped drift opening located at the edge of a contour surface mine.
When in operation, the surface mine approached the underground opening
as close as possible without actually disturbing the old entry. The
acid load discharged to the unnamed Blacklick Creek tributary was 1,8^3
Ib/day.
Mine No. U869
This mine is the old Virginia No. 15 operated by the Standards
Bituminous Coal Company. Mine operation was initiated in 1919- Two
of the openings to the mine are still identifiable, an air shaft and
a portal. Both opening* have been intersected by a surface mine which
terminated at this location. The air shaft was dry, however, a 90 gpm
effluent discharged from the second opening. The acid load was 1,722
Ib/day.
Mine No. 1*890
Portions of the original concrete portal still remain at this
site. This was the Virginia No. Ik mine originally opened in 1929
by the Standard Bituminous Coal Company. The mine was reportedly in
operation until at least 1952 and the working covered approximately
860 acres (13). At the time of inspection a 1*05 gpm effluent drained
from the still intact and open portal. The acid load discharged to
Aulds Run was 9,987 Ib/day,
171
-------
Mine No. U893
At this site a 5 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage was
collected from the base of a spoil pile area associated with a surface
mine. A portion of the disturbed surface area has been filled with waste
material from a nearby active coal preparation plant. Percolation of
surface water through this waste material results in numerous immeasurable
seepage areas along the length of the surface mine. The 5 gpra cumulative
sample represented only a portion of the total drainage. The acidity
concentration of the drainage was 20,000 mg/1 and the acid load was
1,200 Ib/day.
Mine No. U897
This surface m;ne has also been filled with waste material from
a coal preparation plant. There were numerous discharges of highly
mineralized effluent along the entire length of those portion of
the disturbed area filled with refuse. A single representative sample
of only 3 gpm carried an acid load of 2,205 Ib/day. The acidity
concentration was 6l,250 mg/1. As a result of the immeasurable seepage
areas the total load contribution from this site could not accurately
be determined.
Mine No. U898
»
This area has been surface mined, drift mined, and then portions
of the surface mine have been filled with refuse from an active coal
preparation plant. A portion of the originally unreclaimed surface
mine spoil piles have been backfilled to cover the refuse material.
172
-------
However, there were numerous areas of seepage about the base of the
regraded; spoil piles. A 15 gpm effluent, which represented the major
discharge point, carried an acid load of 5,220 Ib/day.
Mine
The 65 gpm effluent from Mine No. ^910 flows from an area which
has been mined by both surface and underground methods. The l,HUy
Ib/day acid load is the largest discharge from a series of mines
located along several small unnamed tributaries of Blacklick Creek.
Mine Ho. 5018
Mine No. 5018 is located along a small unnamed tributary to Black-
lick Creek near the community of Josephine. The mine portal has caved
and the 250 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slump area. The
acid load discharged to the receiving tributary was 1,170 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5026
Mine No. 5026 is located along a small unnamed tributary to Black-
lick Creek near the community of Josephine. The mine portal has caved
and the 5^0 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slump area.
The acid load discharged to the recieving tributary was 3,^6? Ib/day.
Site No. 5037
Near the community of Nanty Glo a large mine refuse dump is located
adjacent to an unnamed Blacklick Creek tributary. As a result of surface
water percolation through the pile there was considerable seepage along
173
-------
the base of the dump. The cumulative result of this seepage was the
total water quality degradation of the tributary. At the lower end
of the refuse area the tributary carried an acid load of 35,^2^ Ib/day.
Site No. 5076
The source of this acid discharge was another large refuse dump
in the Nanty Glo area. It appears that a small spring may have been
covered by the dump. At the point where the drainage emerges from the
pile an 8 gpm flow was recorded.' The acid load was 2,093 Ib/day.
Site No. 3571
The source of this acid discharge was an abandoned mine refuse
dump on Ramsey Run. The 12 gpm effluent from the dump area carried an
acid load of ^,709 Ib/day. The acidity concentration of the highly
mineralized effluent was 32,700 mg/1.
-------
TWO IICK CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
175
-------
TWO LICK CREEK
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Two Lick Creek drains an area of 190 square miles in Indiana
County. The water quality of main stem Two Lick Creek is con-
tinuously polluted along its entire length as a result of coal
mine discharges. This degraded water quality condition ex-
tends above the community of Wandia Junction along the entire
length of the North Branch. The South Branch is the only
major tributary in the watershed unaffected by coal mine
drainage.
2. A total of Ijb discharging sources and approximately 2,800
acres of surface mined land were investigated in the study
area. Discharges from coal mine sources ranged from one to
985 gpm and totalled 10.2 million gallons per day (jngd).
The total net acid load discharged by these sources was
36,6U5 lb/day.
3. Active mines were not a significant source of mine drainage
pollution in the Two Lick Creek watershed. The net load from
all active sites in the watershed was alkaline (508 lb/day).
U. Abandoned drift mines, shaft mines, and mine refuse piles were
the major sources of mine drainage pollution in the study area.
These three source types contributed an acid load of 30,858 lb/
day. This load represented approximately 85 percent of the
acid load discharged by all Yfk sources in the Two Lick Creek
watershed.
176
-------
5. A total of twelve principal sources of mine drainage dis-
charge were located in the study area. These sources in-
clude six drift mines, three combination mines, tvo mine
refuse dumps, and one shaft mine. These twelve sources
discharged a total acid load of 29,lUU Ib/day. This load
represents approximately 80 percent of the total acid load
measured in the watershed.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA
Two Lick Creek drains an area of 190 square miles in Indiana
County. The tributary arises in the east central corner of the
county and flows generally southwest toward the confluence with
Blacklick Creek near the community of Josephine.
The principal tributary to Two Lick Creek is Yellow Creek.
This tributary drains an area of 67 square miles or about one-
third of the total Two Lick Creek watershed.
Coal mine operations in the Two Lick Creek area are extensive
in nearly all portions of the watershed. The only area in the
watershed where mines were noticeably absent was the 22 square
mile area of the South Branch.
The majority of discharging mine sites in the Yellow Creek
drainage area were confined to that area below the Homer City
water supply reservoir. A few sites are located immediately
above the reservoir and one additional area of mining activity
was located near the headwaters of Little Yellow Creek in the
vicinity of Heilwood.
177
-------
STREAM WATER QUALITY
The water quality of main stem Two Lick Creek is continuously
polluted along its entire length as a result of coal mine discharges.
This degraded water quality condition also extends above the community
of Wandin Junction along the entire length of North Branch Two Lick
Creek. The South Branch of Two Lick is unaffected by mine drainage.
The quantity and quality of the mine discharges were such
that the stream water quality was continuously degraded. There
was no point along the main stem where the water quality of Two
Lick Creek was improved by alkaline tributary inflow or by dilution
and neutralization of the upstream discharges.
During the course of the 1968 field study, several stream lo-
cations were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 23). These sta-
tions were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine
drainage. A summary of this stream data is presented in Table 2U.
The locations of the sampling points are shown in Figure 15.
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
An estimated UOO raining sites and approximately 2800 acres of
surface mined land were investigated during the Two Lick Creek
study. Samples for chemical analysis were collected from I?1* sources
discharging at the time of survey. The total effluent from these
sources was more than 10 million gallons per day (mgd). The total
net acid load discharged to streams in the Two Lick Creek watershed
was 36,6U5 Ib/day.
178
-------
Station
Number
TABLE 23
Stream water quality sampling Stations
Two Lick Creek
Sampling Period
Stream
Location
4747 May, Oct., 1968
4778 May, June, Oct. 1968
4779 May, Oct., 1968
4780 May, June, Oct. 1968
4781 May, June, Oct. 1968
4782 May, Oct. 1968
4783 May, June 1968
Feb. 1969
4784 May, June 1968
Feb. 1969
4785 May, June, Oct. 1968
4786 May, June, Oct. 1968
4787 May, June, Oct. 1968
4788 May, June, Oct. 1968
4789 May, June 1968
4790 May, June 1968
4792 May, 1968
4984 June, 1968
Tearing Run
Yellow Creek
Yellow Creek
Little Yellow Creek
Yellow Creek
Little Yellow Creek
Two Lick Creek
Perm Run
Dixon Run
Buck Run
North Branch Two Lick Creek
South Branch Two Lick Creek
Unnamed trib to Yellow Creek
Unnamed trib to Yellow Creek
Two Lick Creek
Two Lick Creek
near mouth
near mouth
at USGS Gage
near mouth
just above mouth of
Little Yellow Creek
at Route 422
just above mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
near mouth
179
-------
tf
0 •£
B
r
g
>s
nganese
1 lb/di
>
c%
M r-
flj
4-1 i-H
m
25
oj
MH
rH
3 rH
W "-x
g
>
*< S
*l
•s
rH 0
fa at
•H
&2
4 B
VI C
C
O
•H
4J
4 •
W 55
Si -4 CM
in 00
oo cn -*
cn so m
rH en
f"^ CO P"*
r-4
CM
"2
*t »*L
CM O\ Cjv
oo so m
X c u
338
00 CO CO
in ^* s0
O rH rH
CM m r-t
000
SO rH O
r-l
O O O
in ON oo
m O m
so in
CM
0) *
X C X)
O CM CM
sO sD in
cn m ^d•
m co ON
CM CM
sD »tf CO
CM r*- in
CM I-H cn
cn ON cn
sD in CM
r^ in cn
o o in
oo in CM
§O O
O 0
i-H CM CM
cn CM CM
in co O
ON fn CM
sO *O so
rH
-X C 4J
338
sO sD sO
00 CO CO
in o in
so en co
cn -tf m
o sr r^-
rH CO
in CM ON
CM SD so
rH CM
O O O
co m in
CM CM »d-
O m ON
i-H OS OO
cn CM
in in O
cn CM so
m m o
m '•» t-v
-------
Sv
<_n ro _
4> -P- O
O O O
T
«~ ^
!§•!?
!o H.
i LO CTs
> CO £-
OQ
(U
e- 3
-------
LEGEND
STMAM WATCH OUAUTY
SAMSUNG LOCATIONS
KACKLIC/r CHfEK,
FIGURE 15
TWO LICK CREEK
STREAM VMVTER QUALITY SAMPLING LOCATIONS
-------
A description of the mine drainage sources follows. All
mine site locations in the Two Lick Creek watershed are shown in
Figure 16.
TWO LICK CREEK
North Branch
Six small surface mines and three underground mine openings
were located at the very headwaters of the fflbrth Branch above
Route 286. Three of these mines were discharging at the time of
inspection. These were Mine'No.'s Ul99» ^200, and U?51. However,
the net load from these sources was alkaline (2 Ib/day).
In downstream order, the next sources of mine drainage were
located in the immediate vicinity of Commodore. The largest dis-
charge in the area resulted from the Commodore Mine. The effluent
was artesian in nature and was measured at 9^5 gpm. However, the
load from the mine (No. Ul97) was alkaline. Mine No. ^198 is lo-
cated on the west side of Route 236 and contributed an acid load
of 319 Ib/day. Mine No. Ul96 was located just north of Commodore
and contributed an acid load of 180 Ib/day.
Areas of the North Branch between Commodore and the conflu-
ence with the South Branch at Wandin Junction has been extensively
mined. This activity is most extensive along the west bank. Small
drift mines and surface mines have been developed in at least two
coal seams which outcrop along the hillsides. The largest single
source of mine drainage discharge in this area resulted from Mine
182
-------
No. Ul?l. There are two openings at this site and they contributed
a combined effluent of 135 gpm. The acid load was 350 Ib/day.
Another major source df discharge was contributed by Mine No. Ul86,
a slumped drift mine. The acid load was 108 Ib/day.
Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of North Branch
coincident with the source inventory. During this period, the
stream carried an acid load ranging from 1,7^3 Ib/day to 7,3^8 lb/
day (Station No. ^787, Table 2*0.
South Branch
At the time of the mine drainage source investigation, coal
mine operations were totally absent in the 21.9 square mile drain-
age area of South Branch, A stream water quality sampling station
was located at the mouth of the South Branch. During the sampling
period, the pH of the stream ranged from 7.2 to 7.6. On two of
the three sampling occasions, the stream carried a net alkalinity .•
concentration. The one time the stream carried a net acid load
the concentration was only one mg/1. (Station No. ^788, Table 2U).
Two Lick Creek, Wandin Junction to Buck Run
A slope mine is located immediately below the confluence of
the North and South Branches at Wandin Junction. The portal was
still open but the mine was completely inundated with water and
there was no drainage. A negligible acid load was carried by
drainage seeping from the refuse pile associated with the mine.
183
-------
Mine No. Ul65 was located on the north bank of Two Lick
Creek downstream of the small community of Diamondville. The
upstream opening contributed a discharge of 310 gpm which car-
ried an acid load of 3»27^ Ib/day. A second opening was dry.
A contour surface mine is located approximately 100 vertical
feet above Mine No. kl6*j. This surface mine parallels Two
Lick Creek for approximately 0.5 mile and then runs along an
unnamed tributary to the main stem. A total of four discharge
points were found in the area disturbed by the mine. The com-
bined acid load from these discharges (No.'s ^160, Ul6l, Ul62,
U16U) was 258 Ib/day.
The Cherryhill No. 3.Mine operated by the Imperial Coal
Company was located on main stem Two Lick Creek directly across
from Mine No. Ul65 described above. The mine was not active at
the time of inspection. Drainage from the mine was channeled to
a series of recently constructed settling ponds. There was no
drainage from the ponds to Two Lick Creek. At present time (1971)
the mine has been closed and according to Commonwealth records,
produces an acid effluent which drains to Two Lick Creek.
Mine No. Ul66 was located on the south bank of Two Lick Creek
near the Clymer Fire Tower. This mine had apparently been sealed
at one time, but the 50 gpm effluent has broken through to the
surface about 15 feet from the seal. The acid load discharged to
Two Lick Creek was 2,66U Ib/day.
181*
- T,V • -"•- r-t
-------
Buck Run
Mine No. 1270 is a drift opening located in the base of a
highwall in an unreclaimed surface mine area. The acid load dis-
charged to the headwaters of Buck Run was 79 Ib/day. In down-
stream order, the next significant discharge was contributed by
Mine No. Hl5U. The acid load from this slumped drift opening
was U32 Ib/day. Mine No. 1273 is located on an unnamed tributary
to Buck Run. The area has been mined by both surface and under-
ground mining methods. The 35 gpn» discharge emerges via wooden
drainage pipe from the disturbed area. The acid load discharged
to the unnamed tributary was 155 Ib/day.
A contour surface mine is located along the east bank of
Buck Run. Numerous drift mine openings have been developed in
the base of the existing high-walls. One of these drift mines
(No. U159) contributed an acid load of 615 Ib/day to Buck Run
A total of 1^ discharging mine sites were located in the
3.1 square mile drainage area of Buck Run. These mines contributed
a combined acid load of 1,U35 Ib/day.
Stream sampling Station No. U786 was located near the mouth
of Buck Run. The stream was sampled for water quality analysis
during May, June, and October coincident with the mine drainage
source investigations. During this period, Buck Run exhibited pH
values ranging from 2.6 to 3*3 and carried an acid load ranging
from 3,23^ Ib/day to 15,595 Ib/day (Table 2^).
185
-------
Dixon' Run
The first aourcea of mine drainage discharge in the 10
square mile drainage area of Dixon Run were located at the very
headwaters of the tributary. The only major discharge resulted
from Mine No. 128U. At this mine, a 30 gpm effluent was sampled.
This drainage represented cumulative seepage from a surface mined
area. The acid load discharged to the headwaters of Dixon Run
was 202 Ib/day. An acid load of 180 Ib/day was measured below a
surface and underground mined area near the community of Idamar.
This was mine No. 1291 and the drainage actually represents a
combination of several effluents.
The Barr Slope Mine is located on an unnamed tributary to
Dixon Run just downstream from the community of Dixonville. This
mine was dry at the portal. A local resident reported that drain-
age from this mine as well as from other underground mines on the
west side of Dixon Run is discharged by the Tanoma borehole. This
borehole is located on an unnamed tributary to Crooked Creek on the
opposite side of the drainage divide separating Dixon Run and Crooked
Creek. Crooked Creek is a tributary to the Allegheny River. During
the field survey, the presence of the Tanoma borehole was verified
but no water quality information was obtained.
An artesian effluent of 30 gpm was located on the eastside of
Dixon Run south of Dixonville. The discharge may represent a bore-
hole from one of the mines in a deeper coal seam which does not out-
crop on Dixon Run. The acid load carried by this discharge (No.
was 20? Ib/day.
186
-------
An active drift mine, operated by the F P & K Coal Company
was in operation on an unnamed tributary to Dixon Run. At the
time of inspection, this 'mine discharged an alkaline effluent
(Mine No. 1295).
Both underground and surface mines were located along both
banks of the downstream reach of Dixon Run. However, these mines
were either dry or contributed only minor acid or alkaline loads.
Two Lick Creek, Dixon Run to Penn Run
A contour surface mine approximately two miles in length is
located high on the south bank hillside just downstream from the
community of Clymer. Actually there are two segments to the mine.
The first short section is connected via haul road to the much longer
second section.
Numerous drift mine openings have been developed in the highwall
of these surface mines. Most or all of these openings were associ-
ated with the abandoned Cherryhill No. 1 Mine. Three drainage sources
were located in the first (short) section of the strip mine. Four
drift openings are located in the highwall of this section. The por-
tals are still open but have been sealed with cement blocks about 20
feet inside the openings. Drainage was seeping around the sides of
at least two of these seals. Each of the three discharges represent
seepage from the drift openings or from the surface mine spoil piles.
The combined acid load from No.'s UyOO, V?01, and U?02 was 17 Ib/day.
•187
-------
A discharge of 105 gp» flowed from the base of a slumped drift
opening immediately adjacent to the beginning of the second segment
of the surface mine described above. The discharge is via pipe
which extends from the caved mine opening. This effluent is chan-
neled to two settling ponds and then overflows to Two Lick Creek.
Treatment facilities have obviously been used at one time to treat
this effluent but had since been removed. There were numerous bags
of unused and spoiled lime remaining at the site. The acid load
contributed by this source was 1,103 lb/day (No. hjOk).
Two additional mine openings were located in the base of the
highwall approximately O.b mile from Mine No. VfOU described above.
At least one of these openings had been sealed about UO feet inside
the opening. Drainage from these two openings contributed an acid
load of 2U4 lb/day (Mine No. U?03).
Two additional discharges, representing cumulative seepage,
were located along the bottom edge of the strip mine. These were
No. 's U?05 and 1*706 with a combined acid load of 92 lb/day.
A large abandoned mine is located along an unnamed tributary
which enters Two Lick Creek on the north bank. The entry to the
mine was dry. However, several samples representing cumulative
seepage were collected at the base of the large refuse pile associ-
ated with the mine. These were discharge No.'s hjlO and Vfll. A
nine gpm effluent was measured at No. VflO. The acidity concentra-
tion of this effluent was U5,700 mg/1 and it carried an acid load
188
-------
of U,936 Ib/day. The acid load contributed by No. kjll was ^56 Ib/day.
The Dixon Run Coal Company operated a drift mine located along
main stem Two Lick Creek on the bank opposite the confluence of Penn
Run. The Dixon Run Mine was developed in the base of a strip mine
highwall. At the time of inspection, this mine contributed an acid
discharge of 1^ Ib/day. At the present time, it is reported that
the mine has closed.
Penn Run
The water quality along much of the length of main stem Penn
Run was affected by mine drainage. Several abandoned surface mines
were located near the headwaters of the tributary. These operations
were dry. Three surface mines were active at the time of survey.
These operations were also dry at the time of inspection. However,
numerous seepage areas were located immediately adjacent to the bank
of Penn Run. The cumulative effect of these effluents were sufficient
to degrade the water quality of Penn Run. Surface mine operations
were located on the hillside above the area of these seepage points.
The Cherryhill No. U Mine was located along the south bank of
Penn Run. This operation was a drift mine developed in the highwall
of a recently reclaimed surface mine. The Cherryhill Mine was not
in operation at the time of inspection. However, a treatment faci-
lity was in operation at the mine. A 3&0 gpm effluent was lime
treated and aerated over limestone prior to discharge to a settling
pond. The final effluent discharged to Penn Run carried an alkaline
load of 531 Ib/day. (No. U?l6).
189
-------
Although the treatment facility produced an alkaline discharge,
the effluent carried a total iron concentration of 28.5 mg/1. As a
result, the effluent was highly discolored and produced a similar
discoloration along the entire downstream reach of Perm Run.
The Cherryhill No. U Mine has since been closed and sealed.
However, it is reported that the mine produces an acid discharge.
It has also been reported that one section of this mine has been
intersected by auger holes from a nearby surface mine, thus limit-
ing the efiectiveness of the mine seal.
Stream water quality sampling was conducted at the mouth of
Penn Run coincident with the mine inventory. During this period,
Perm Run carried an acid load ranging from 960 Ib/day to 6,869 Ib/day
(Table 2U, Station No.
Two Lick Creek, Penn Run to Allen Run
A hillside contour surface mine approximately one mile in
length is located along main stem Two Lick Creek just downstream
from the mouth of Penn Run. A drift mine had been operative near
the downstream end of this operation. This mine was operated by
the Penn Hills Coal Corporation and had been closed just prior to
inspection. All three portals were still open and each contributed
drainage. The combined acid load discharged from these three open-
ings (No. 5150) was 53 Ib/day. The upstream portion of this surface
mine was an extension of the older workings in which the Penn Hills
mine was located. This newer section had been reclaimed and Penn
190
-------
•Hills was in the process of developing a new drift mine.
An unreclaimed surface mine was located along Two Lick Creek
on the bank opposite the area described above. Two drift open-
ings were located in the base of the strip mine highwall but were
dry. Discharge No.'s 1*713 and 1*71** were located below the base
of the strip mine spoil piles. The combined acid load of these
two effluents was 126 Ib/day.
Allen Run
Contour surface mines are located along both banks of Allen
Run. Two drainage sources were located at one operation and the
other was dry. The two discharging sources contributed a combined
acid load of 2k Ib/day (No,' s 1*756 and 1*757).
An active drift mine, operated by the Chestnut Ridge Mining
Company was in operation near the headwaters of Allen Run. The
mine is located in the base of a surface mine highwall. This mine
had a small treatment facility but since the mine was dry at in-
spection, this facility was not in operation.
Two Lick Creek, Allen Run to Ramsey Run
Several combination surface and underground mines were located
along the bank of Two Lick across from the mouth of Allen Run. These
mines and possibly a few others have become inundated as a result of
the new Two Lick Creek Reservoir. At the time of the source investi-
gation, this reservoir was under construction and has since been com-
pleted.
191
-------
An active drift mine, operated by the Peles Brothers Coal
Corporation, was in operation on an unnamed tributary to Two Lick
Creek, a short distance below the mouth of Allen Run. This mine
was dry at the time of inspection.
Ramsey Run
With the exception of a small seepage area near its mouth,
Ramsey Run is unaffected by mine drainage discharges. The exact
origin of this single discharge, No. 14-758, is not known but it
may result naturally from a coal outcrop in the stream bed. The
load carried by the 8 gpm effluent was alkaline with some minor
discoloration.
Two Lick Creek, Ramsey Run to Yellow Creek
The R & P Lucerne No. 3-A Mine is located on Two Lick Creek,
a short distance below the mouth of Ramsey Run. At this point,
the coal is hauled across Two Lick Creek and through the hill
separating the Two Lick and Yellow Creek drainage areas. The
coal finally emerges at the preparation plant located on Yellow
Creek. The drainage from the mine is pumped to the surface near
the portals on Two Lick Creek. At the time of inspection, approxi-
mately 100 gpm was piped through a revolving drum which contained
limestone. After emerging from the drum, the drainage was piped
to a settling pond prior to discharge to Two Lick Creek. The final
effluent carried an alkaline load of 60 Ib/day and the iron concen-
tration was 2.0 mg/1 (Mine No. 5153).
192
-------
The Lucerne 3-A mine is now reported by the Commonwealth as
closed and sealed. However, acid seeps have occurred around the
seals and also from a discharge pipe within one of the seals.
Mine No. 1*791 wa-s the last source of mine drainage discharge
above the mouth of Yellow Creek. It appears that a shaft or
similar mine entry has been sealed at this site on the bank of
Two Lick Creek. A wooden drainage pipe emerges from the bank of
the stream approximately 20 feet from the old capped mine entry.
The discharge was 320 gpm and carried an acid load of 7,910 Ib/day.
During the survey period, Two Lick Creek above Yellow Creek
carried an acid load ranging from 31,369 Ib/day to 6^,351 Ib/day.
Tearing Run
A total of 19 mine drainage discharges were located in the
^.7 square mile drainage area of Tearing Run. The combined acid
load from the sources was 5,657 Ib/day. Mine No.'s 1*769 and U771
were both major sources of underground mine discharge. These mines
are located on the main stem of Tearing Run near the community of
Waterman. The remains of what appears to be a mine seal is located
at the opening of Mine No. ^769. A 90 gpm discharge from this seal
carried an acid load of 1,793 Ib/day. Mine No. ^771 is located
adjacent to several old mine buildings in the same general vicinity
as Mine No. ^769. There are two openings about twenty feet apart
at Mine U771. The combined effluent from these openings was 380 gpm
193
-------
which, carried an acid load of 1,778 Ib/day.
A strip mine, which discharges to a tributary of Tearing Run,
is a major source of mine acid discharge. This mine is a steeply
pitched contour strip mine with a vertical relief of nearly kQO
feet. There were numerous seepage areas occurring at the base of
the high wall. This drainage then flows along the floor of the
strip cut until it drains away from the mined area via. natural drain-
ways through the spoil piles. A total of five such discharges were
located along the one mile length of this mine. The combined acid
load of these five sources (No.''s 1*737, ^738, 1*739, V7UO, Vftl) was
1,60U Ib/day.
Two Lick Creek, Tearing Run to Mouth
A surface and underground mined area near the community of
Graceton contributed numerous discharges to Two Lick Creek. At
least one large underground mine was once operative in this area.
This activity was followed by surface mine operations which par-
tially destroyed or covered some of the old mine entries. There
is considerable seepage around the lower edge of the entire complex.
This drainage emanates from both the strip mine spoil piles and the
refuse piles associated with the earlier underground mine.
The largest acid discharge in the area described above drains
from Mine No. Vf28. At this site, a caved portal was located along
the hillside. Approximately 50 feet below the old portal, three
mine effluents emerged from the hillside. The combined flow of
these effluents was 220 gpm and the acid load was 2,7^6 Ib/day.
-------
Another source of underground drainage resulted from Mine No. U732.
The 30 gpm effluent emerges from the base of the slumped drift open-
ing and follows a drainage course adjacent to a bank of coke ovens.
This effluent then combines vith the drainage from Mine No. U?28.
The acid load discharged by Mine No. 1*732 was 128 lb/day; An ad-
ditional acid load of 303 lb/day was contributed by drainage from
the strip mine and the refuse piles (No.'s 4729, 4730, 1*731, and
4733).
Mine No. 's 4727 and 4734 are drift mines located just a short
distance from the complex mentioned above. It is not known whether
these mines interconnect with this area or whether they are associ-
ated with the next downstream mines at Coral. The acid loads dis-
charged by Mine No. 's 4727 and 4734 were 284 lb/day and 117 lb/day,
respectively.
A large slope mine once operated at Coral. Several banks of
beehive coke ovens still remain at this old mine site. Both slope
openings to this mine were dry. However, the portals appeared to
be water filled a short distance inside the openings. Discharge
No. 4725 represents the overflow from a pond located at the Coral
complex. This pond was probably used for quench water for the
coke ovens or may have been used in a coal preparation plant.
The acid load was 28 lb/day.
YEUDW CREEK
Headwaters Area
Several underground and surface mines were located at the
195
-------
headwaters of Yellow Creek near the small community of Alverda.
Mine No, Ul82 was the only source of mine drainage discharge in
this area and the acid load was negligible. Several shaft and/or
slope openings to deeper coal seams were also found but were dry.
One non-discharging surface mine pond was sampled (No. Ul83),
however, the pond was highly alkaline.
The community of Mentcle is located along Yellow Creek, a
short distance downstream of Alverda. A large slope mine is lo-
cated in the community of Mentcle. The main portal and air shaft
were dry although there was noticeable subsidence behind the caved
slope opening. This was the Bethlehem No. 11 Mine (Heilwood Divi-
sion). Although dry at the portal, this mine contributed a dis-
charge of 819 gpm near Heilwood, the next downstream community.
Locally, the discharge is known as the "Heilwood Flume". The dis-
charge was alkaline and carried an alkaline load of 8^5 Ib/day.
Three additional mine openings, reported locally as the Beth-
lehem No.'s 6, 7, and 8 Mines, are located on the hillside approxi-
mately one mile upstream of Heilwood. There are three separate
mine openings in this area. Each of these openings are associated
with a sizable refuse pile. Mine No. Ul?9 was the only one of the
three openings contributing drainage at the time of inspection.
The acid load from this source was 12 Ib/day.
Leonard Run
The active valley Coal Company No. 8 Mine is located on the
east bank of Leonard Run near the headwaters of the tributary.
196
-------
The mine is located in the base of a strip mine highwall. At the
time of inspection, this mine produced an effluent of 60 gpm
(No. 51^8). This acid drainage was then lime treated and sent to
a series of settling ponds. However, the final effluent from the
pond carried an acidity concentration of 53 mg/1 with a resultant
acid load of 38 Ib/day. A second acid discharge (No. 51^9) of
18 Ib/day emanated from the refuse scattered about the Valley
No. 8 Mine site. The present status of this mine is unknown.
Additional surface and underground mines are located along
both banks of Leonard Run. In general, the discharges from these
mines contributed acid loads of less than 10 Ib/day. One of the
underground mines was reported as the Bethlehem No. 3 Mine. This
drift mine is located on the east bank of Leonard Run near its
confluence with Yellow Creek south of Heilwood. There was notice-
able subsidence around the portal area. The 20 gpm effluent carried
an acid load of 1*4- Ib/day (Mine No. U125).
The Valley Coal No. 2 preparation plant is located on the east
bank of Leonard Run near its mouth. As of February 1971» this faci-
lity was listed as "in compliance" by the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources.
There were no additional coal mine sites located in that por-
tion of the Yellow Creek watershed above the confluence of Little
Yellow Creek.
LITTLE YELIDW CREEK
A total of fifteen surface mined areas were located along the
197
-------
banks of Yellow Creek in the headwaters area. Several of these
operations were active at the time of survey. There were no
drainage sources emanating from the surface mined areas. One
strip mine pond was sampled and the alkalinity concentration was
Ul rag/1 (No. 4178).
Drift mines had been developed in two of the surface mines.
The underground mine in the northernmost surface mine was aban-
doned and dry. Both the Glory Coal Company and the Valley Coal
Company operate underground mines in the second surface mined
area. The Glory No. 2 Mine was dry. Treatment facilities for
the Valley No. 11 Mine had been installed but, for a lack of
drainage at inspection time, these facilities were not in use.
There were no additional coal mine operations located in
the downstream areas of the Little Yellow Creek drainage area.
YELIDW CREEK BEIDW LITTLE YELLOW CREEK
Only a limited number of coal mine operations were located
along Yellow Creek between the mouth of Little Yellow Creek and the
area downstream near the Homer City water supply reservoir. The
few drift mine operations which were located, are in the general
vicinity of the New Yellow Creek dam approximately one mile down-
stream of the old route 259 crossing of Yellow Creek. Much of
this surrounding area has been cleared for the formation of a new
lake on Yellow Creek. Mine No. Ul22 was the only source of dis-
charge and contributed an acid load of only 2 Ib/day. Several
198
-------
mine openings near the dam site have been sealed as part of the
overall development of Yellow Creek State Park.
Yellow Creek, Homer City Reservoir to Mouth
Yellow Creek supports stocked trout and other fish over its
entire length down to and including the Homer City water supply
reservoir. A short distance below the reservoir, the stream be-
comes grossly polluted as a result of coal mine discharges.
Both surface and underground mines are located along both
banks of Yellow Creek in the vicinity of the reservoir. Point
sources of mine drainage contributed only minor acid loads. How-
ever, refuse areas and numerous unreclaimed spoil banks add im-
measurable amounts of acid to the stream. The north bank of Yellow
Creek has been mined by surface and underground methods in at least
two coal seams. In places, the outcrop has been "punch mined" with
as many as ten drift openings occurring side-by-side.
An unnamed tributary, which enters Yellow Creek approximately
O.U mile upstream from the community of Tide, discharges a signi-
ficant acid load to the receiving stream. Mine No. 1263 was the
largest source of acid discharge on this small tributary. The
mine has been sealed and a 25 gpm effluent discharged from the
base of this seal. The acid load was 810 Ib/day. Another mine
opening (No. 126U) is located about 200 feet north of Mine No. 1263.
The discharge from Mine No. 126U was 12 gpm with a resultant acid
load of UO Ib/day. Drift Mine No. 1265 discharged an acid load of
199
-------
36 lb/day while Mine No. 1266, a combination underground and sur-
face mine, contributed an additional acid load of 1?6 lb/day.
Near the mouth of the unnamed tributary mentioned above, the
stream also receives an undetermined amount of seepage from the
large refuse pile at Tide. During the period of survey, this
small tributary carried an acid load ranging from 2,988 lb/day
to 5,952 lb/day (Table 2U, Station No. U?90).
A second unnamed tributary enters Yellow Creek at Tide. This
tributary drains a small area of the watershed immediately south of
the unnamed tributary described above. Discharge No.?s 126l and
1262 were the major sources of mine drainage discharge on this
tributary. Both effluents represent cumulative seepage from the
base of strip mine spoil piles. It also appeared that the area
had been drift mined. The acid loads discharged by No.'s 1261 and
1262 were 312 lb/day and 936 lb/day, respectively. Additional dis-
charges contributed a combined acid load exceeding 130 lb/day.
However, this tributary also receives an undetermined amount of
seepage from the large refuse pile at Tide. During the period of
survey, this unnamed tributary discharged an acid load to Yellow
Creek which ranged from 1,U90 lb/day to 5,610 lb/day (Table 2^,
Station No. 1*789).
In the vicinity of Tide, Yellow Creek acquired the gross dis-
coloration evident along the remaining downstream length. Refuse
and other waste material is scattered along the bank of Yellow Creek.
of this material is washed into the stream itself. The large
200
-------
refuse pile located on the nearby hillside covers some *4O acres.
Seepage areas are evident along nearly the entire length of these
refuse areas. It is the .cumulative effect of these effluents in
combination with the two unnamed tributaries described above
which totally degrade the water quality as well as the aesthetic
appearance of Yellow Creek. A few of the seepage areas were sam-
pled during'the study. These discharges exhibited acidity con-
centrations as high as 15,250 mg/1 (No. 5006). The iron concen-
tration of this sample was 1,178 mg/1.
A 50 acre refuse-dump from the Lucerne Mines is located
along the bank of Yellow Creek, a short distance below Tide. As
with the Tide refuse area, this disposal area also contributes
an undetermined amount of mine acid and solid materials to Yellow
Creek. Only one of the seepage areas was sampled and the 3 gpm
effluent carried an acid load of l6l Ib/day (Ho. 5001). A sludge
pond associated with the same Lucerne complex also contributed an
acid load of 21 Ib/day (No. 125H). The operating Lucerne Mine dis-
charged its effluent to Two Lick Creek and is discussed in an earlier
section of this document.
The last source of discharge in the Yellow Creek drainage area
resulted from an undetermined source. The effluent discharged in-
termittently from what appeared to be a bore hole pipe located at
the edge of the cooling water pond from the old power plant on the
east side of Route 119 almost directly across from the Homer City
Water Works. Discharge from this bore hole pipe was observed on
201
-------
FIGURE 16
TWO LICK CREEK
MINE LOCATION MAP
-------
several occasions during the course of field work in the immediate
area. However, on the single occasion that a field crew was able
to determine that the discharge was mine drainage (pH <3.0), the
flow ceased before a sample could be collected. The drainage from
this pipe feeds the small cooling pond which in turn overflows
into Yellow Creek.
A total of 17^- discharging sources and approximately 2,800
acres of surface mined area were investigated during this study.
Table 25 presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and
total loading (ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to
receiving streams in the Two Lick Creek study area. Table 26
presents a summary of flow volumes and chemical loadings by
source type for the 1?^- discharging sources inventoried during
the study.
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
As shown in Table 26, active mines are not a significant
source of mine drainage pollution in the Two Lick Creek watershed.
The overall net load from mines operating in the Two Lick Creek
watershed was alkaline. With the existing pollution control laws
in effect within the Commonwealth, it would not be expected the
new mines developed in this watershed should add to the existing
mine drainage pollution problems. At the time of inventory, an
acid load of more than 18 tons per day was contributed by inactive
or abandoned coal mine operations.
205
-------
m
CM
3
PQ
<
H
e "£.
3 n)
C T)
•H s*»».
B xi
3 r-l
,-_! ^^x
OJ ^N
w ^
0) n)
C -0
60X1
C r-l
C
O ^N
J-l >>
H cd
id
4J i-l
O ***
H
/-s
0) >s
4J nj
ctf ^0
t— ( j^l
3 T-4
CO N-'
CO ^s
CO CO >s
oo i— i co nj
C cd d *d
•H 4J T3 *^
rrj g O r-l XI
cd cd fed H cd r-i
O CD W ffi N-'
•U K
O co U
00 4J
cd 60 W OJ >s^
o >> c cj a w >,
•H XI 1-1 H -H Cd
td > hJ i-l t3 T)
Vi -H n) .H v^_
*tj <1) O 4J O XI
0 3 O
<0
00
f_|
?— 1 Oj r*^s
dj r^ €
4J 0 CX
O TO 60
Q ^
05
O 0
Jj
• 3
O O
2; co
60
c
•H
•H Cd
0) (U
U M
0)
r4
O
I-l
r-l
co
co
CM
vO
r-l
O
ON
CM
CO
m
ON
CM
s^
co
co
^J
^J*
t*
CM
o
vO
I-l
CO
r-l
SE
o
r-l
1-1
Q)
>*
o
u
(0
_o
•H
4J
T)
Unname
Creek
VO VO VO in r-l O
m J 00 CO
O -vj" ON r^ i— i
3 a
rJ !3 h PQ Ct|
p o o o
3 4J & 4J 4J
H 0
CO TH CO CO
J3 XI rJ XI XI
O -H -H C -H
B MO M 3 P
{£
r-> -*
CM
r-l ON
CO CM
f^
-------
'•s
a)
3
C
•H
U
C
o
O
in
CSI
w
rJ
CQ
H
B -N
3 r**
C cd
•H T)
B "^
3 43
I-l 1-1
0) /-s
CO >-,
a) cd
6043
C r-l
C
O *~s
H cd
T3
cd 43
1 | j
O N-X
H
4) X-N
4J >,
cd cd
M-l TJ
i— 1 "• —
3 43
CO r-l
CO x-N
CO >,
nj C *"O
O J-i ,O
H cd r-i
H! s^
ij
0) r^<—V
•H Cd
1-1 13 t)
cd v-i *^
4J O 43
O B
•H cd
0) 0)
U (-1
m jj
« co
co i-< i5 CSI
r-l CO
00 CSI CO CO
rrj
fa
cd C
C C
O O)
(U P-i
l_3
o
O 4J
4J
CO CO
43 43
C *H -H
3 U M
D5 4J 4-1
C
tl (!) OH (1)
cd B B
C cd C cd
O C C C C C
m C 3. 0) G 3
rJ P {2 PH P 06
O rH VO St
r^- ON
r-l
O CN O csi
CSI r-l
O o oo m
ON 00
CO r-l
•vt rH 00 si"
o m o
i-i oo ^o
v£> CSI
v£5 vO *^ tO
o in ON
t-l O VO
csi
csi , CO)
n
ft
>o
CO
CM
O
r-l
r*
r^>
*^
r*»-
r-4
J
^
C_(
Q
H
207
-------
CO
60
C
•H
•O
ctf
O
VO r-l
CM
CU
W M
3 Ctf fc
« C JC
s
C cd
•H TJ
lie
r~l r-i
< ^
cu x-\
w ts
cd
C TJ
ctf ^
60.0
C *H
£~
C
o '•N
n ts
H ctf
•O
rH ^*s,
Ctf rQ
4J r-l
O ^
H
CU /-N
4J >,
cd cd
"4-1 TJ
_J ^^
r™* ^x.
3 XI
CO r-4
V^
CO X-N
0) >N
i-4 ,
) H -H cd
CU 1-4 r-l TJ *O
O Cd -H ^^
U O 4J 0 JD
3 S O -^ •-<
O N H ^
CO
CO
0)
60
r-l ,4 ^s
cd cd E
4-> J3 O.
O U 00
H co "-'
•H
Q
CO
<4-l CU
0 0
V4
• 3
o o
!3 CO
0)
U
iJ (U
3 (X
0 >s
CO H
r~ m co O
r» r-i co
00 r-l
co co in O
1-4 r-i in
i-i
'
00 00 «tf O
m co CM
ON r-l CM
I-l
00 t^ ON CM
r-l 00 VO
r-. oo vo
co co «n
co
ON «* l*» CM
00 O 00
m r-4
O O O I
m in vo
~ i f.
m CM
r-i
O CM 00 i-l
oo vo r-. i
CM m r~
^
«*
r-4 VO CM r-l
r>. ^>
CO /-^ 10 CO *~* to
CU T) CU CU TJ CU
c cu a c cu c
g§ 27 S§ S7
•O P *w i>
•U C 4Jv4 O.C &i-"
U-lcd —' CO^-'
vo r>- r>>
ON ON vo
CM CO vO
r>. vo oo
CM vt 3F
vt «* m
.
o r~ oo
VO r-l 00
r-l
QO VO r-4
CM ON rv
<»• o\ oo
•t A
CM CM
vo r^ in
t^ r-4 O>
VO r-l r-l
ft ft ft
CO 00 f^
m o vo
r-l in ON
t>- CO CM
00 CM O
CM CM
CO
cu
c
•H
a
01
C '••* co *^> CU *~\
O TJ CU "O r-t 'O
•H CU C CU vl CU
4J C -H C PM C
cfl 0 S 0 0
C TJ TJ 0) -O
•H C 4J C CO C
A ctf M-I cd 3 ctf
6 J3 cd J3 u-i X)
O ctf ,13 rfl CU cd
CJ v-' co ^ (K ^^
o m
CM
O CM
(^ co
CM m
m in
in
o in
m m
2 3
CM 00
CM ON
CM CM
&
O
^•N r4
CO (U U
i-l > W
r-4 ••-) 3
cu jj O
S o
Cd r-l
co C cd
cd 1-1 o
o ^ o
m
r-4
•*
CM
3
co
co
CM
o
«
r-l
J3
<
»^
H
208
-------
Based on the initial field survey sampling program, 12 of the
total 17^ discharging sites contributed nearly 80 percent of the
total acid load measured in the study area. These sources in-
cluded six drift mines, three combination surface-underground
mines, two coal refuse areas, and one shaft mine. The combined
acid load discharged by these 12 sites was 29,II1! Ib/day.
Several of the principal sources represent only the major
discharge points within a mined area or complex which may contain
several additional sources which contribute less significant acid
loads. In such cases, abatement or reduction of the acid loads
emanating from these sources of lesser magnitude would be expected
coincident with abatement of the major source site.
Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement pro-
gram in Two Lick Creek should include the 12 sources mentioned
above. Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites would
be expected to contribute significant acid discharges. Detailed
engineering studies and mine effluent sampling, conducted during
an entire water year, would more accurately characterize the rela-
tive contribution of each source. Such long-term repetitive water
quality determinations may necessitate the consideration of addi-
tional major sources located elsewhere in the watershed.
The 12 principal sources listed in Table 27 provide a rela-
tive indication as to where the major mine drainage problems occur
in the Two Lick Creek watershed. Until such a time when additional
209
-------
B
cd
CD
Vj
JJ
CO
01
c
^
•rl
0
&
cd
•*v.
XI
4J
•*
^ rH
co •*-,
(U bj
o 6
3
O
CO
60 b4
cd U Q>
C W o
r^ -H re o c
CM cd O -H cd
L| M-4 4-1
W TJ 14 -HO
. i r ^ rl -1
1— 4 Vj U (J
PQ CO r-l -"
VO
co
ON
O
O
in
vO
0
o
o
vO
o
CO
CM
r-l
a
d
S
C
o
•rl
4J
cd
C
•rl
0
O
CM
vO
CM
r-l
0 0
4J 4J
h h
M rl
cd cd
jj fSd ,^ r*xj 4J ^ rX ,M
3 Is** r^ r^> ^5
»~H
-------
study can provide a more detailed assessment of the problem, these
12 sources can effectively serve as the first phase or priority in
a program of drainage source abatement in the Two Lick Creek water-
shed. Once drainage control has been established at the principal
source sites, the abatement program could be expanded to include
additional discharge points of lesser magnitude.
The following is a description of the twelve principal sources.
The locations of these mine sites are shown in Figure 17.
ERINCIBVL SOURCES
Mine Ho. 1262
This combination surface underground mine is located on an un-
named tributary to Yellow Creek. The 12 gpm effluent represents
cumulative seepage from the base of strip mine spoil piles. This
surface activity has destroyed or covered older underground mine
entries. Refuse from an underground mine located elsewhere in the
vicinity has also been dumped in the strip cut. One section of the
disturbed area was also used as a sanitary landfill. The acid load
was 936 Ib/day. An additional drainage source (No. 126l), from this
same mined area, contributed an acid load of 312 Ib/day.
Mine No. 1263
Mine No. 1263 discharged an acid load of 810 Ib/day. The drift
opening has been sealed and the drainage emerges from a trap device
at the base of the seal. The area directly in front of the openings
211
-------
FIGURE 17
TWO LICK CREEK
PRINCIPAL SOURCE LOCATION MAP
-------
appears to have been surface mined and then Mine No. 1263 was de
veloped in the base of the highwall.
Mine No. *H59
The U6 gpm effluent from this mine drains directly from an
open drift mouth developed in the base of a strip mine highwall.
At least six additional openings were visible along the length
of this surface mine. The acid load from Mine No. ^159 was
615 Ib/day. Other discharges from this same mine contributed an
additional acid load of 9^ Ib/day (No.'s *H55 and
Mine No.
This mine is located on the opposite bank of Two Lick Creek
directly across from the now abandoned Cherry Hill No. 3 Mine. A
large refuse pile is also associated with Mine No. ^165. One open-
ing to this mine was dry while the other discharged a 310 gpm efflu-
ent which carried an acid load of 3>2jh Ib/day.
Mine No. Ul66
This mine is located on the south side of Route 223 approxi-
mately two miles east of Clytner. (Near the Clymer Fire Tower).
The opening is approximately 90 vertical feet above the roadway.
The opening had been sealed at one time but the 50 gpm effluent
has since broken through the adjacent hillside about 15 feet from
the seal. The acid load carried to Two Lick Creek was 2,664 Ib/day.
215
-------
Mine No.
Mine No. kjok is a drift opening located at the tip of a con-
tour surface mine extending along main stem Two Lick Creek just
downstream from the community of Clymer. This opening is one of
several in the immediate area associated with the abandoned Cherry
Hill No. 1 Mine. The portal to Mine No. kjOk has slumped and the
105 gpm effluent discharges via pipe extending from the interior
portion of the mine. The effluent is channeled to two settling ponds
and then overflows to Two Lick Creek. Treatment facilities have been
operative at this site during the past. There were numerous bags of
unused and spoiled lime remaining at the site. However, all physical
structures associated with this facility have since been removed.
The acid load contributed by this source was 1,103 Ib/day.
tit* No. 1*710
A large underground mine complex was at one time operative on
an unnamed northbank tributary to Two Lick Creek approximately one
mile downstream from Clymer. Openings to this mine were located on
both sides of Route 286. Although these openings were dry, the
large refuse pile associated with this mine was responsible for the
discharge of a very highly mineralized effluent. The 9 gP*11 effluent,
representing cumulative seepage from the base of the pile, exhibited
an acidity concentration of ^5,700 mg/1. The acid load was ^,936 Ib/day.
Two additional seeps from the same refuse area contributed a combined
additional acid load of U79 Ib/day (No. 's U711, 1*712).
216
-------
Mine No. 1»728
This mine is located in an area which has been mined both by-
surface and underground mining methods. At this particular cite,
a slumped drift mine was located along the hillside. Approximately
50 feet below thi* portal, three separate effluents emerged from
the hillside. The combined flow of these effluents was 220 gpm
and the resultant acid load was 2,7^6 Ib/day. Seepage from the
strip mine spoil piles, refuse areas, and other mine openings con-
tributed an additional acid load of more than bQO Ib/day.
Mine No.
Mine No. 1*769 is located on Tearing Run near the community of
Waterman. This opening is one of five in the immediate area, all
of which are probably associated with the same mine operation. The
opening had been sealed at one time but this seal has fall«n into
disrepair and the 90 gpm effluent emerges directly from the seal.
The acid load carried to Tearing Run was 1/793 Ib/day.
Mine No. **771.
This mine is located in the same immediate area as Mine No.
1*769 described above. However, the openings are on the opposite
side of Tearing Run near several old mine buildings. The two'
openings at Mine No. 1*771 are about 20 feet apart and contributed
a combined discharge of 380 gpm. The acid load was 1,778 Ib/day.
217
-------
Mine No. U791
The origin of this source is actually a bore hole located on
the bank of Two lack Creek near Hisinger School in Homer City. It
appears that a shaft or slope entry has been sealed at this site.
A wooden drainage pipe emerges from the bank of the stream approxi-
mately 20 feet from the sealed entry. The discharge was 320 gpm
which carried an acid load of 7,910 Ib/day. This site represents
the largest single source of mine drainage pollution in the entire
Two Lick Creek drainage area. A local resident stated that this
discharge emanated from the old Tide Mine.
Site Ho. 5006
No. 5006 represents cumulative seepage from the base of a
large refuse pile near the community of Tide. This effluent repre-
sents only one of innumerable and generally immeasurable seeps
which originate at the base of this gob disposal area. These
seepage areas occurred along most of the 0.6 mile length of the
pile. The acidity concentration of this effluent was more than
15,000 tng/1 with a resultant acid load of 5^9 Ib/day.
218
-------
LITTLE OOHIMUBH RIVER
WKE DRAIKAOE IKVENTORY
219
-------
LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The Little Conemaugh River drains an area of 188 square miles in
Cambria County. The entire length of the main stem between the
headwaters and the community of Jet stown is severely polluted
as a result of coal mine discharges. Some of the largest dis-
charges in the Kiskiminetas River basin are located in the vicinity
of Portage.
2. A total of 99 discharging sources and approximately 1,UOO acres
of surface rained area were investigated in the study area. Dis-
charges from the coal mine sources ranged from one to 3»78U gpm
and totalled more than 29 million gallons per day (mgd). The
total net acid load discharged by the 99 sources was 153,570 Ib/day.
3. At the time of survey, there were four active discharging mines
in the Little Conemaugh River basin. Two were surface mines and
the other two were drift mines. The largest of the underground
operations was the brookdale #77 Mine of the Bethlehem Mine Corp-
oration. At the time of inspection, this mine produced an untreated
effluent which carried an acid load of 1,^15 Ib/day. According to
the Commonwealth, this mine now provides adequate treatment of its
mine discharge.
\
U. Abandoned drift mines and shaft mines were the major source of mine
drainage discharge in the Little Conemaugh River basin. These two
source types contributed an acid load exceeding 70.5 tons per day.
220
-------
This represented over 90 percent of the acid load discharged by all
99 sources in the basin.
5. A total of seven principal sources of mine drainage discharge were
located in the study area. These sources included five shaft vines
and two drift nines. These sources discharged a total net acid
load of 121,3^ Ib/day. This represents about 80 percent of the
total source acid load discharged by all 99 sources.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA
The Little Conemaugh River rises south of Cresson, Pennsylvania
in Caabria County. The river flows generally southwest through the
communities of Lilly, Portage, South fork, and joins Stony Creek at
Johnstown to form the Coneaaugh River. The principal tributary to the
Little Conemaugh River is the South Fork of the Little Coneaaugh River.
The South Fork drains 62 square miles of the total 188 square idle
drainage area of the Little Coneaaugh River.
Coal mine operations are extensive in all areas of the watershed.
A number of large abandoned shaft mines are located in this study area,
particularly in the vicinity of Portage. The bore hole discharges from
these shaft mines contribute some of the largest acid loads encountered
in the entire Kiskioinetas River drainage area. At the time of the mine
drainage inventory, active underground operations were limited to the
large Cambria Ho. 33 slope and the Brockdale No. 77 Mines of Bethlehem
Mines Corporation. At the time of the survey, several one or two nan
"donkey mines" were also in operation. Several active surface mines
were inspected and it appeared that additional areas were available
for the expansion of these operations.
221
-------
STREAM tRTER QUALITY
The headwaters area of the Little Conemaugh Hirer was immediately
degraded by discharges from abandoned surface and underground coal nine
operations. The polluted condition of the river is farther degraded by
massive acid discharges in the vicinity of Portage. This degraded water
quality condition persists along the downstream reach of the river to
the community of South Fork.
The drainage area of South Fork little Coneaaugh River is umaffected
by mine drainage above the community of Lloydell. Below this community,
shaft mine discharges located along the main stem and tributaries of
the South Fork were responsible for the grossly polluted condition feua*
along the entire downstream reach of the South Fork.
Below the conwunity of South Fork, the water quality of the Little
Conemaugh River does not improve along its downstream roach to the con-
fluence with Stony Creek at Johnstown. There were numerous sources of
significant mine drainage discharge in this area.
During the course Of the field study, several stream locations
were sampled for chemical analysis. (Table 28). These stations were
selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine drainage in the
study area. A summary of this data is presented in Table 29. The
locations of these sampling points are shown in Figure 18.
SOURCES OF mire DRAINAGE
An estimated 230 mining sites and approximately 1,UOO acres of
surface mined area were examined during this 1968 study. Samples for
222
-------
oo
CM
a
CO
C
O
•H
4J
cd
4J
TO
60
n
•H
cfl
CO
n)
3
a4
0)
4J
rt
a;
60
cd
60
CO
o
CO
s
£
•a
3
cd
Q)
c
0
u
0)
r^
4J
4J
•H
00
ON
t 1
n
o
§<*£)
ON
O i— 1
0)
Q >s
M
« cd
^» 3
.-i C
3 cd
i— i
vO
(M
m
^4
o
J*
4J
3
O
CO
U-l
0
42
4J
3
i
&
O
i-i
,
^4
ctf
j3
a
cd
223
-------
I
s».
§ TJ
C •--
5 ^
a
d
t> -a
i*
00
C fi
It
fl f"
r-l
4J H
O <
X
(0
B>
W-l
iH
3 fi
C/l "x^
0
e
4
GO -0
|S
S-3
•H JD
Specific 7
9 Conductance
Station Sampling
No. Date
CO 00 xt
, • •
f U C
3 0» id
*-) Q fj
fx. CM CM
oO in o
m m rx
ft CM *n
ft f* CM
eO xt tx
\O
ft
O m m
ON O s X -
rH r-H U
^ 3 a
^ *-> a
»n
O = -
0
ft CM r*
00 CM NO
CM CM co
CM rH NO
o r-t m
0 f« 0
CM O ^
in fM oo
in i^, o"N,
ON fM O
CM ft O
o m oo
rx QO rx
ON rx oo
CM CM xT
m ON eo
NO CM O
ON O 00
O f* tx
ON r- CM
m in m
O g O
CM O SO
fl CM
CO CO O
eo co m
00
vO CO Qp
rx - -
§- J
4^
O 0 O
sss
O rx in
pr» r~ 1
CM f" rx
eo eo m
O eo «n
xt 1? 3
00 00
NO NO 00
ON ON NO
ft — ON
at x .
§•38
<-)-!&
O- :
-------
-------
chemical analysis were collected from 99 sources discharging at the
time of survey. The total effluent from these sources was more than
20 thousand gallons per minute (gpm) or 29.k million gallons per day
(mgd). The total net acid load discharged to the Little Conemaugh
River was ?6.8 tons per day.
A description of the mine drainage sources follows. All mine
site locations in this study area are shown in Figure 19 following
the source description section.
LITTLE OOHEM&UGH RIVER, ABOVE SOUTH FORK
Headwaters Area
Ho coal mine operations vere located along the short reach of the
main stem Little Conemaugh River between the headwater community of
Cressen and downstream community of Lilly. However, several mine
drainage discharges were located on an unnamed tributary which enters
the main stem in this headwater area. The most significant of these
discharges resulted from Nine Ho. 5061. At this site, a 65 gpm efflu-
ent from the base of a slumped drift mine opening discharged an acid
load of 37** Ib/day to the receiving tributary. The three remaining
discharges (Mine Ho.'s 5060, 5062, 5063) contributed a combined acid
load of 158 Ib/day. An open shaft mine was also found in this area;
however, it contributed no discharge.
Burgeon Run, Bear Rock Run
A total of eight drift openings were located along the banks of
Burgeon Run. At the time of inspection, all of these mines were dry
and as a result, the tributary was unaffected by mine drainage. The
226
-------
pH and conductivity measured near the mouth of Burgoon Run were 6.5 and
310, respectively.
With the exception of the very headwaters area, vine operations were
distributed throughout the entire Bear Rock Run drainage area. An active
surface mine was located on Christie Hollow, a tributary to Bear Rock
Run. Settling ponds had been constructed below this operation; however,
the nine was dry. In addition to this surface mine, three drift mines
were in operation during the study. These were the Standard Wo. 1 and
Mo. 2 Mines of the Lilly Mining Company and the mine operated by the
Hew Hope Mining Company. These mines were small two-four man operations
which employed donkeys for coal car haulage. All of these mines were dry.
The most significant source of abandoned mine discharge in the Bear
Rock Run drainage area resulted from Mine Ho. 5058. At this surface mine,
a snail tributary (hillside spring) had been diverted through a partially
reclaimed surface mine. This small tributary carried an acid load of
1^9 Ib/day below the surface mined area near the point where the tribu-
tary entered Bear Rock Run.
Little Ceaenaugh River
Several discharges from abandoned underground drift mines were
located along the main stem Little Conemaugh River below the coosnnity
of Lilly. These mines include No.'a 5116, $117, and 5118. The com-
bined acid load discharged by these mines was ikl Ib/day.
A series of bore hole discharges were located along the banks of
the Little Conemaugh River in the general vicinity of Portage.
227
-------
The first of these bore hole discharges was located along the
north bank of the river at site No. 5H^» northeast of Portage. A
total effluent of 1,400 gpm was measured at this site. The acid
load vas nearly 6 tons per day.
The second site (Ho. 5115) vas found along the south bank of
the river just north of Portage. Two side-by-side bore holes at
this location discharged a combined effluent of 563 gpa. The acid
load vas 3,783 Ib/day.
The last bore hole discharges in this area were located along
the north bank of the river about 0.8 mile west of No. 511?. These
were No.'s 5008 and 5129. An effluent of 2?8 gpm discharged from
No. 5008. The effluent comes to the surface via pipe casing which
once carried power lines to the underground mine. The discharge
from No. 5129 vas 3,?8U gpm. The acid loads from No.'s 5008 and 5129
were 1,601 Ib/day and 22,70^ Ib/day, respectively.
All of the bore hole discharges mentioned above were reported
as draining the large abandoned Sonman Mine. The main portal to this
mine (slope entry) is located on Spring Run. There was no discharge
at the portal. The preparation plant associated with the Sonman Mine
was in use by surface mine operators for crushing and screening of
coal before loading into rail cars. It appears likely that the Sonman
Mine may be interconnected with other shaft and/or slope mines in the
vicinity of Portage.
228
-------
Boas Crook
Four surface mines and eight drift mines were located within the
Bens Creek drainage area. The only active site was a surface mine in
the upper reaches of the tributary. The major sources of mine drain-
age discharge were Nine Ho. 's 5119 and $120. Mine Ho. $119 contributed
an effluent of 10 gpm from the base of the slumped drift opening. The
acid load was 6O Ib/day. The effluent at Ho. $120 discharged from a
drainway below several drift mine openings1 The 32 gpm effluent con-
tributed an acid load of 159 Ib/day.
Spring Run
This small tributary drains an area northeast of the community
of Portage. Mine Ho.'s $123 and $12U discharged the major portion of
the total acid load received by Spring Ran. These loads were 119 Ib/day
and 21 Ib/day, respectively. A small seepage area was also located at
the base of the refute pile from the abandoned Sonman Mine. This source
(Ho. $069) contributed an acid load of 18 Ib/day.
Trout Run
The ten square mile drainage area of Trout Run has been mined
extensively in all portions of the watershed below the Portage Reservoir.
There were no coal mine operations above the reservoir.
A total of three effluents (Ho.'s 506*, 5065, $066) were located
along the base of a surface mine in the upstream area of Trout Run. The
combined acid load discharged by these sources was 766 Ib/day. The
major portion ($86 Ib/day) of this lead was contributed by Ho. $06U.
229
-------
Several other strip mines and drift mine openings associated with these
surface mines were located in this area; however, they were dry.
An active drift mine, operated by the Lonely Coal Company, was in
operation along the north side of Trout Run. This mine operated in a
small coal reserve abandoned by prior mining operations. There was no
discharge from the Lonely Mine.
Mine No. 5159 is an abandoned drift mine driven under the bed of
State Route l6U, which parallels a portion of Trout Run. There were
two openings to the mine, both of which were partially open at the
time of inspection. The airway was dry; however, a discharge of 62 gpm
was measured at the mouth of the mine portal. The acid load contributed
by Mine No. 5159 was 8C4 Ib/day.
The large abandoned Miller Shaft Mine is located along the lower
reaches of Trout Run. A slope opening to this mine has been driven
under the bed of State Route l6U. This opening was dry. A second open-
ing was located in the vicinity of the tipple; however, it was also dry.
Approximately 150 yards below the tipple, a bore hole discharged an
artesian effluent of 2,282 gpm. The acid load carried by this effluent
was more than 5.5 tons per day. Five separate refuse dumps are located
along the banks of Trout Run in the vicinity of the Miller Shaft. These
waste dumps undoubtedly contributed to the degraded water quality of the
stream.
North Branch
The Bethlehem No. 33 Slope Mine was the only coal mine operation
230
-------
located on this tributary to the Little Conemaugh River. The drainage
from this mine is pumped to a treatment facility on the South Branch
of Blacklick Creek below the community of Revloc. This discharge is
discussed in the Blacklick Creek Sub-basin report.
A discharge was sampled near the mouth of North Branch. However,
a gas well was responsible for this effluent. The discharge carried a
net alkaline load of 1^9 Ib/day (No. 5113).
Little Conemaugh River
One of the most extensive coal mine complexes in the entire
Kiskiminetas River basin was located in the community of Wilmore.
This was the Maryland No. 2 Mine of the Berwind White Coal Company.
In addition to the numerous mine buildings, preparation facilities,
etc., a coal fired steam generating plant was associated with the
Maryland mine. Both main shaft entries to the mine have been sealed.
The only sources of discharge resulted from the waste dumps associated
with the Maryland complex. Three of these effluents (No.'s 5070, 5l6l,
and 5162) contributed a combined acid load of k6l Ib/day.
A series of abandoned drift mine openings were located along the
north bank of the Little Conemaugh River in the vicinity of Ehrenfield.
These were Mine No.'s 5108, 5109, and 5112 and discharged acid loads of
2^3 Ib/day, 338 Ib/day, and 2,646 Ib/day, respectively. A discharge of
882 gpm was measured at Mine No. 5112.
The active Ehrenfield No. 8 mine operated by the Pennsylvania
Coal and Coke Company, is located at Ehrenfield. The only discharge
directly attributable to this mine was a four gpm effluent from the
231
-------
air fan. There are numerous acid discharges in the immediate area;
however, the Commonwealth does not consider Ehrenfield No. 8 respon-
sible for these discharges. These.other discharges were confined to
mines in coal seams below the active operation. These included Mine
No.'s 5105, 5106, and 5107 and other discharge points near the east
end of the community of Ehrenfield. Mine seals have been constructed
at five discharge points in the immediate Ehrenfield area. These in-
clude Mine No.'s 5102, 5103, 5110, and No.'s 5105, and 510? mentioned
earlier.
Stream sampling was conducted on the Little Conemaugh River Just
above the confluence with the South Fork Little Conemaugh River. During
the sampling period, (Table 28) the acid load carried by the river ranged
from 22 tons per day to 56 tons per day (Table 29).
SOUTH FORK LITTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER
Headwaters Area
The Beaverdale water supply reservoir is located near the head-
waters of the South Fork Little Conemaugh River. Coal mine operations
were totally absent in the headwaters area which drain to the reservoir.
Several surface mines were located on tributaries which drain to
the river below the reservoir. However, there were no significant
mine effluents discharged to the South Fork Little Conemaugh River
above the community of Beaverdale.
South Fork Little Conemaugh River, Beaverdale to Sidman
A bore hole discharge of 289 gpm was received by the South Fork in
the community of Beaverdale. All evidence of the shaft or slope mine
entry has been destroyed. Considerable amounts of mine refuse
232
-------
are scattered about the immediate area. The acid load carried by
this effluent (Ho. 5260) was 2,220 Ib/day.
Mine No.'s 5100 and 5127 discharged significant acid loads
to the South Fork approximately 1.5 miles below Beaverdale. Mine
Mo. 5100 contributed a discharge of l,kQ& gpm and carried an acid
load of more than 6 tons per day. The effluent from this mine
drains from the original concrete portal which is still intact.
The effluent from Ho. 5127 represents cumulative seepage from the
large refuse pile associated with Mine Ho. 5100. The acid load
contributed by the refuse area drainage was 1,176 Ib/day.
There were no additional mine discharges below Ho.'s 5100 and
5127 and the downstream community of Sidaan.
Otto Run
Otto Run and its principal tributary, Sulphur Creek, joins the
South Fork Little Conemaugh River in the community of Sidman. All
sources of mine drainage were located on Sulphur Creek.. However, due
to the severity of these discharges, Otto Run is similarly affected
along its entire downstream length below the confluence with Sulphur
Creek.
The first sources of mine drainage discharge, Mine Ho.'s
and 51*i2, are located at the very headjwaters of Sulphur Creek.
The combined acid load discharged by these two surface mines was
67 Ib/day. Several additional surface mines and two slope mine
openings were found in the headwater areas but they were dry.
233
-------
Mine No. 51^0, located in the community of Dunlo, discharged an
acid load of 4?8 Ib/day to Sulphur Creek. The portal to this drift
mine was dry; however, a ho gpm effluent was discharged via the air-
way.
The largest mine discharge on Sulphur Creek was located about
0.5 mile above the confluence with Otto Run. This effluent (No. 51510
discharged by means of a bore hole on the north bank of Sulphur Creek.
The measured effluent was 1,730 gpm which carried an acid load of
6,228 Ib/day. A local surface mine operator reported this bore hole
drained a series of interconnected shaft and slope mines. These mines
included the Dunlo, Yellow Creek, and Henrietta Mines.
Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Otto Run coincident
with the mine drainage inventory in 1968. During this period, (Table 28)
Otto Run at the mouth carried an acid load ranging from two to seven
tons per day (Table 29).
South Fork Little Conemaugh River, Sidman to South. Fork
Only two other areas of coal mining activity were located on the
South Fork Little Conemaugh River between the community of Sidman and
the downstream community of South Fork.
The St. Michael Shaft Mine was located on a small unnamed tribu-
tary which enters the South Fork near the communities of St. Michael
and Creslo. Both shaft entries to this mine have been filled. A
large diameter pipe is located near the shafts on the bank of the
unnamed tributary mentioned above. The effluent from this bore hole
-------
pipe was 3,272 gpm which carried an acid load of nearly 2U ton* per
day. An additional acid load of l,UUo Ib/day was coatributed by
drainage from the extensive mine waste dump* associated with the
St. Michael Mine.
A large mine refute dump covering many acres is located along
the South Bank of the South Fork just above the confluence with the
Little Conemaugh River. A total of seven drift mine openings were
located in the vicinity of the refuse dump. Three of these mines,
Ho.'s 5132, 5133 and 513U are situated in such a manner that they
drain to the Little Conemaugh River. Only one of the four remain-
ing openings contributed a discharge at the time of inspection.
This was Mine Ho. 5135 with an acid load of k6h Ib/day.
Mine Ho.'s 5130 and 5131 are located on the north bank of the
South Fork directly across from the large refuse area mentioned
above. The discharges from these mines are located at the same ele-
vation and separated by approximately 75 yards. Mine Ho. 5130 con-
tributed an acid load of 9,16^ Ib/day and Mine Ho. 5131 discharged
an alkaline load of 90 Ib/day.
Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of South Fork
Conemaugh River coincident with the mine drainage source investi-
gation (Table 28). During this period, the acid load carried by
the river ranged from a minimum of 37 tons per day to a maximum of
6h tons per day (Table 29). Other mine draiaage parameters were
also excessive.
235
-------
LITTLE OONEMAUGH RIVER BELOW SOUTH KIRK
Little Conemaugh River, South Fork to Mineral Point
The first mine discharges located on the south bank of the
Little Conemaugh River below the community of South Fork were from
Mine No.'s 5132, 5133 and 513^ mentioned in the preceeding section.
These are all drift mines and contributed a total acid load of
661 Ib/day.
A contour surface mine, approximately 2.5 miles in length, is
located along the south bank of the river just downstream of the
community of South Fork. Multiple coal seams have been mined along
approximately one-half of the total length of this surface mine. The
only point sources of drainage occurred from the base of the spoil
piles. This discharge (No. 508U) contributed an acid load of 110 Ib/day
to Bear Run. This tributary intersects the mined area and is diverted
across several hundred yards of disturbed area. At the point where
Bear Run leaves the surface mine it carried an acid load of 219 Ib/day.
The sample of Bear Run (No. 5085) was collected above the point where
the spoil pile drainage (No, 508U) enters the tributary.
A second large surface mine is located on the north bank of the
Little Conemaugh River below the community of South Fork. Three dis-
charges, representing cumulative seepage, were collected at the base
of the strip mine spoil piles. The total acid load from these sources
(No.'s 5089, 5090 and 5091) was 162 Ib/day.
Saltlick Run
Saltlick Run drains an area of 11.U square miles and enters the
236
-------
Little Conemaugh River in the small community of Mineral Boint. A
total of three underground mine discharges were located in the Salt-
lick drainage area. These were Mine No.'s 5Q9a, 5093 and 509U. The
acid load contributed by these discharges were 1,197 Ib/day, 135 lb/day,
and ^96 lb/day, respectively.
Saltlick Reservoir is located near the lower end of the tribu-
tary. This reservoir is privately owned and is used as a source of
industrial water supply for the steel mills in Johnstown. In order
to prevent drainage inflow to the reservoir from the three sources
listed above, the mine effluents are diverted around both sides of
the reservoir and finally discharged to Saltlick Run below the reser-
voir.
Little Conemaugh River, Mineral Bpint to Johnstown
An abandoned drift mine and a large mine refuse dump are located
on the north bank of the river just west of Saltlick Reservoir. Drifl
Mine No. 5087 discharged an alkaline effluent of 7 lb/day and the refuse
area discharged an effluent which carried an acid load of 3»HO lb/day.
The active Brookdale No. 77 Mine of Bethlehem Mines Corporation
is situated on the north bank of the river in the same area described
above. At the time of inspection (August 1968), the Brookdale Mine
discharged an acid load of l,Ul5 lb/day directly to the Little Cone-
maugh River, Treatment facilities have since been installed at this
mine. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Re-
sources, the treatment is adequate and results in an alkaline discharge
with an iron concentration less than 7 mg/1.
237
-------
Four significant mine discharges were located across from the
Brookdale Mine on the opposite bank of the river. Each discharge
drains from the same area which has been mined by both surface and
underground methods. Three of the effluents (Ho.'s 5096, 5097 and
5099) emanate from the bases of partially open drift mines. The
acid loads from these sources were 950 Ib/day, 3**7 Ib/day and
535 Ib/day, respectively. The fourth discharge (Ho. 5098) was
collected below the surface mined area. The acid load from this
source was 370 Ib/day.
Mine Ho. 5095 was the last downstream site draining directly
to the south side of the Little Conemaugh River. The point of dis-
charge probably represents an area where underground nine workings
have broken through to the surface. The discharge was 60 gpm and
carried an acid load of k07 Ib/day.
Clapboard Run joins the Little Conemaugh River approximately
0.3 miles above (upstream) of the USGS gaging station at last Cone-
maugh. Mine Ho. 's 5256 and 5257 were the only mine operations on
Clapboard Run. A total of four openings were located in the imme-
diate area; however, only two were discharging. Both discharging
openings appeared to have been sealed at one time. The acid loads
discharged by Ho.'s 5256 and 5257 were 1,530 Ib/day and 1,818 Ib/day,
respectively.
238
-------
LLGEND
ABANDONED GAS WCLL
JMDtRGROUND MINE
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
MINt RFFUSE
STR'P MJNE
FIGURE (9
UTTLE CONEMAUOH RIVER
MINE LOCATION MAP
-------
During the course of the field study, strewn sampling was con-
ducted on the Little Conemaugh River at the USGS gage in East Cone-
•aufh. This stream station is below all mine drainage inflow located
in the Little Conemaugh River study area. l>uring the sampling period
(Table 28) the river carried an acid load ranging from U8.5 tons per
day to 98.5 ton* per day (Table 29). Other mine drainage related
parameters were also excessive.
A total of 99 discharging sources and approximately 1,UOO acres
of surface mined area were investigated during this study. Table 30
presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and total loading
(ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to receiving streams
of the Little Conemaugh River. Table 31 presents a summary of flow
volumes and chemical loadings by source type for the 99 discharging
sources located during the study.
POLLUTION ABATEMENT
As shown in Table 31, abandoned shaft mines were the principal
pollution sources In the Little Conemaugh River. The total acid
load discharged from these shaft or slope mine sources was 109,^51
Ib/day. Abandoned drift mines were the secondary major source type
and discharged an acid load of 32,085 Ib/day.
Seven of the largest mine < ffluents were responsible for a
large portion of the total acid load discharged by all sources in
the Little Conemaugh River. These seven abandoned sources include
-------
1
2
jj
09
00
c
•H
•H 5-4
Q) 0)
0 >
OJ g
O >> J3
CO .O. 00
3
,
0) n)
C T)
n) ^
60,0
C rH
C
O
H >i
n)
1-4 TJ
n) \
O i-l
H ^
-,
rt o)
l~~l ****v.
3 JO
CO r-4
OS s-\
m >,
r-i oj n)
ctf C TJ
4J *t3 ^v
O J-l J3
JJ
^ 4J K*^
•H rt
i— -4 ^J ^Q
n) -H ^-.
4J O J3
0
r-i
jj
•H
^
00
St
VO
%
,
00
o\
•1
in
^s.
rH
CO
r-i
00
VO
CO
st"
in
O
co
m
r-4
Q)
r-l
JJ
JJ
•H
>J
O h
jj a>
• *H
•H
U ,C
JJ 60
3
•d o)
||
JU
oovcomr-i ooomoovocMvorHinrHcMco
i-l i-4 CM r-l OCO i-lOO OOrHr-ICO
co O co CM CM r>-
r-l r-l St
vO ^^ CO st CO vO Cs| vO (^ 00 i—4 00 CD CD CD CTs i— 4 CO
«OCM CTiini-IO\COr-4vo
fM in r-l VO
•*
r-l
CD CD vO CD CD St in CD 00 f*"* ON st CD f^ vO CD vo
iH«vocM in covo st m i-i o
en CM vo o i*» m co
A «t \o * *
vo st « i— i in
CM co m
vOOOCMCOin COOstr-ISti-ir^OOCOCOvOOOi-l
st sr 00 CD i—4 r*» ON CM 00 CM vo i— I ON *^ st st
costONCM co cMOcomON i-ioor~co
Mm MA AAAA
mco vor-i r-ivosti^
** o -co i-« co
r-l . CO
ONinOrHON incomoNCMcooooN.i-icMO oococom
IAM A •*•»•*!»
st O CM Is* r-l CO CO
CM m r-i m
iH
mcovocMvo ONr>oomvovocMvocMi-iooco
stovt^tM r-iJ-
M *l H fk M
CM CO CM r-l O
CM
i-ir^OOvOCM CMCOCMStCOCOCMvOr-ICOCMCMON
ON
\£ _\J> ^ fj
rl M OJ C 3 O
O U 0) 3 (X
Pn 5 ti eg h co
PC O bO 3 J
r\ jj fj rf ^ft
JJ Jj 0) 3 i-l d H
3 ed C O P r-4 O
O 0) a) ri Cu 3 H
to PQ PQ H co co
O O O O O O
JJ JJ s JJ JJ JJ JJ
• C • r-l • • •,&!• C
f*^ ^f^ ^j j*^ |_^ flQ ^^ ^ ^J ^J pj J
u -H (2 -H o vi -H -H o) -H a a
C^tl rlS^U Vj C f-l (4 Jj (X
ClJ (4 JJ v/ \ i Q) 4J C3 4J 3 JJ C^ JJ *X
tiO o ajq) 3« & C f.
OJCQvV JJOOJ vVbOvVOOJ'HPI^C
jjjjcd I-i nj C -H 03 rt 3 rt -H nj (X o! JJ ti C
M 3 C c4 C 3 lJ C c O C M C t-i C I-H n) r
z co :=> m ;=> opQ&HOcopcopcopQcj
2U2
-------
five shaft or slope mines and tvo drift mines. The combined acid
load discharged by these sources was 121,3kk Ib/day, about 80 percent
of the total source acid load.
Any initial consideration of a mine drainage abatement program
in the Little Conemaugh River should include the seven sources men-
tioned above. Irrespective of hydrologic conditions, these sites
would be expected to contribute significant acid discharges. De-
tailed engineering studies and mine effluent sampling conducted
during an entire water year would more accurately characterize the
relative pollution contribution of each source. Due to the magni-
tude of each discharge, it would be expected that, even when con-
sidered over a longer time period, each site would remain a major
contributor. However, long term repetitive water quality deter-
minations may necessitate the consideration of additional sources
located elsewhere in this basin.
The seven principal sources (listed in Table 32) located during
this initial survey provide a relative indication as to where the
major mine drainage problems occur in the study area. Until such a
time when additional study can provide a more detailed assessment
of the problem, these seven sources can effectively serve as the first
phase or priority in a program of drainage source abatement in the
Little Conemaugh Biver. Once drainage control has been established
at the principal source sites, the abatement program could be ex-
panded to include additional significant discharge points.
2U3
-------
I-l
CO
0)
I-l
XI
cd
H
^
1 id"
(3 ^CJ
•H *s**
E >Q
3 r-l
s
>-. cd cd
AJ IW TJ
r-l ^
0) 3 Xi
rl P N-^
3 0)
0 >
BO "H
CO IX
Ju 00 ctf C *O
•J 1 f »^J ^v,^
09 a o P xi
60 B E"l Cd rH
C CD EC •••^
•H C
*o o
nj u
o
r-t 0) U
r-t 0> ><^x
0) U a 4J >S
60 4J *ri Cd
S*H i—4 *O *O
IJ Cd 1-1 "^
Cd O <5 r-t
TJ
<0
C
•H 0)
S 60
i—4 cd ^"^
cd xl 6
4J O CU
O 09 60
09
m (]}
O U
0 0
13 m
01
0.
5s
H
01
U
0
CO
•o-
CM
Is*
rf
CM
CO
CM
VO
0
"**
r-l
0
00
^•
vO
00
VO
r-t
9t
in
en
m
00
o
CM
co
fmit
m
,^-
co
09
0)
c
*
4J
y-t
•H
CM m oo O
§ r.
<4-i cd
S 8
0
o
o
vO
co
ON
ps.
ON
*"
CO
vo
vO
M
I-l
vO
o
co
•»
in
m
r-l
st
en
r*.
co
CO
O
CO
Is-
•*
co
00
r-4
o
r^
in
co"
m
,_!
CO
CO
«
-------
The following is a description of the seven principal sources
Mentioned above. A listing of these sources is shown in Table 32*
The location of these nine sites are shown in Figure 20.
SOURC1S
Mine No. $083
The acid load of nearly 2k tons per day discharged by the
St. Michael Shaft Mine was the largest load encountered in the
entire Kiskiminetas River basin. The abandoned nine is located
on a small unnamed tributary which Joins the South Fork Little
Conemaugh River near the communities of St. Michael and Creslo.
The two shaft entries to the mine have been sealed. A large
diameter pipe is situated on the bank of the unnamed tributary
mentioned above. The measured effluent discharged from this bore
hole pipe at the time of survey was 3,272 gpm. Two large refuse
piles are also associated with the mine and contributed a highly
Mineralized effluent to the same small unnamed tributary.
Mine Ho. 5100
Mine No. 3100 is located adjacent to Route 869 in the small
community of Allendale. The 1,1*08 gpm effluent drained from the
original concrete mine portal. This portal is still intact for
some distance into the hillside. The drainage is piped under the
road bed and empties to the South Fork Conemaugh River. The acid
load was 12,33** Ib/day.
2U5
-------
CM
CO
a
00
H
e
ct
01
CO
oi
C
«H
•H
0)
c
£
CI
>% !o
4J i-
oj TJ
(U -H
O U
3 ^^
OP e
co o) E
0) «H
oo &
s ^
a *
•rt R c
0) 0 C
0) C «H cd
CO M-4 4J
•^ O -H C
6 u :
0) 0) T
r-i r-i a c
« « co O
a u u
U hJ
C
cu
«
j
S i
O 1
r-i i
0
1
0) C
ft;
H
01
c
•r^
JS IZ
•K
o
£
3
O
CO b
0>
0 >
>>
at 00
IJ »-4
*O fg
•H Ql
t^ O
•o
dl 01
6 •-"
Cd 4J
C 4J
. 13
vO
O
fsT
«*
in
f_i
CM
1-1
O
o
CO
m
•
CM
r-
CM
CO
a.
g
4-*
CM
CO
O
fH
O)
c
g
M-l
•H
^1
O
o
o
i-H
in
(4
0)
5?
oO
a)
C
O
u
a>
1-1
4J
4J
3
^T
00
1^4
i-1
in
O
o
o
m
CM
CO
•*
O
5
r-<
«
i?
cd
rt
r-4
f«4
»O
Jj
at
5
3°
i
Q)
c
Q
01
r-4
4J
| i
3
o
CM
CM
O
O
m
8
CM
CM
O
in
st
00
co
a.
£
M-l
cd
X
CO
0>
CM
rM
in
(j
0)
>
£
"I
c
4)
§
CJ
0)
^4
4J
4J
•H
_y
J.4
O
fa
wf^
U
3
O
CO
v£>
t-l
ON
m
co
8
CO
CM
00
co
co
O
r-4
§
g
IM
•H
tj
O
CO
l-H
m
"ol
O)
t£j
S
(X
i-i
CO
00
CM
CM
vO
O
o
CO
o
m
00
rH
CO
O
co
1-4
«
•H
35
UH
ej
^f*.
m
1-1
m
C
3
u
3
0
^
vO
CO
i-l
r-4
m
1-4
«^
o
m
o
CM
m
CM
CM
CO
CM
CM
8
3
C0
r*
o
o\
CM
m
«^
CO
r-4
CM
m
r-4
O*
st*
r-*
i
^
2U6
-------
LEGEND
S ABANDONED GAS WELL
—' UNDERGROUND MINE
• SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
^/^ MINE REFUSE
C^> STRIP MINE
FIGURE 20
UTTLE CONEMAUGH RIVER
PRINCIPAL SOURCE LOCATION MAP
-------
Mine No.
The 1UOO gpm effluent measured at this mine site (borehole) is
reported to result from the abandoned Sonman Mine. At the time of
sampling, the acid load contributed by No. 511^ was 11,8UU Ib/day.
No additional information was obtained concerning this major dis-
charge point.
Mine No. 3129
This mine discharge point vas another borehole from the Son-
man Mine. The borehole may act as a common discharge point for
other underground mines interconnected with the Sonman workings.
The effluent measured at this site was 3,?8U gpm which carried an
acid load of 22,70H Ib/day. A second discharge is located adjacent
to No. 5129. The second discharge point (No. 5008) is an artesian
effluent from the pipe casing hole which once carried power lines
to the underground mine. The acid load from No. 5008 was 1,601 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5130
This drift mine was developed along the bank of the South Fork
Conemaugh River just a few feet above the level of the river. There
is no direct access to the discharge point. It is located along the
upstream end of the railyard situated on the South Fork Conemaugh
River. A hillside slump is all that remains of the original opening.
The 1,039 gpm effluent is piped under the numerous rail lines and
discharges directly to the South Fork. The acid load was 9,l6U Ib/day.
2U9
-------
Mine No.
This mine was primarily responsible for the degraded water
quality found at the mouth of Otto Run, a tributary to the South
Fork Conemaugh JUver. The discharge point is actually a borehole
loca ed in the east bank of Sulphur Creek which is, in turn, a
tributary to Otto Run. The effluent was 1,730 gpm and carried an
acid load of 6,228 Ib/day. A local surface mine operator reported
this borehole drained a series of interconnected shaft or slope
mines. These mines included the Dunlo, Yellow Creek, and Henrietta
Mines.
Mine No. 5290
The abandoned Miller Shaft Mine, located on the lower portion
of Trout Run, discharged an acid load of 11,36U Ib/day. The dis-
charge point is located approximately 150 yards below (downstream)
the tipple. At least two additional openings were located at the
tipple site; however, both openings are sealed and dry. The bore-
hole discharged an artesian effluent of 2,282 gpm.
250
-------
STONY CREEK
MINE DRAINAGE INVENTORY
251
-------
STONY CREEK
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Stony Creek drains an area of U66 square miles in Somerset
and Cambria Counties. Stony Creek and its principal tribu-
taries are affected in varying degrees by coal mine discharges
over nearly their entire lengths. The drainage areas of Stony
Creek below the community of Stoystown, Shade Creek, and faint
Creek are the portions of the watershed most seriously affected
by coal mine discharges. Although Quemahoning Creek is affected
by coal mine discharges, the -water quality degradation is not as
severe as in the other principal tributaries.
2. A total of 199 discharging sources and approximately 5,700 acres
of surface mined land were investigated in the study area. Dis-
charges from coal mine sources ranged from one to 2,6*99 CP» and
totalled 23.7 million gallons per day (mgd). The total net
acid load discharged by the l6l sources was 97,310 Ib/day.
3. Approximately UO coal mines were in operation throughout the
Stony Creek watershed at the time of study. A total of eleven
mine effluents were sampled at the active sites. The acid
load contributed by these sources was 6,^30 Ib/day. Treatment
facilities have since been installed at several of the active
mine effluents.
258
-------
U. Abandoned drift mines were the major source of mine drainage
in the Stony Creek watershed. Shaft mines and mine refuse
piles were also major contributors. These three source types
contributed a combined acid load of 8U,lU5 Ib/day, about 86
percent of the total source acid load discharged by all 199
sources.
5. A total of thirteen principal sources of mine drainage dis-
charge were located in the study area. These sources include
ten drift mines, two shaft mines, and one mine refuse pile.
These 13 sources discharged a total net acid load of 6l,?6l
Ib/day. This represents 63 percent of the total acid load
discharged by all 199 sources throughout the Stony Creek water-
shed.
DESCRIPTION OF AREA.
Stony Creek drains an area of U66 square miles located in
Somerset and Cambria Counties. Stony Creek and the Little Cone-
maugh River join at Johnstown to form the Conemaugh River.
The headwaters of Stony Creek rise near the community of
Berlin and flow generally north to Johnstown. Principal tribu-
taries and their drainage areas are Quemahoning Creek (93.8 square
miles), Shade Creek (98.^ square miles), and Paint Creek (37.0
square miles).
STREAM iftTER QUALITY
Stony Creek and its three principal tributaries are affected
in varying degree by coal mine discharges over nearly their entire
253
-------
lengths. The water quality of Shade Creek and Paint Creek is
seriously degraded by mine discharges in nearly all portions of
the drainage area. The distribution of the pollutant discharges
are such that natural downstream recovery becomes impossible and
the acid condition persists at the mouth of the tributaries.
Quemahoning Creek above Sipesville was unaffected by nine
drainage. Below this point the stream receives numerous pollu-
tant discharges. Although Quemahoning Creek is degraded as a
result of mine drainage, it is the least affected portion of the
Stony Creek watershed. A large privately owned reservoir is
located near the mouth of the creek which, after treatment, is
used for industrial water supply.
The main stem of Stony Creek is seriously degraded by nine
drainage. This is particularly evident in the lower half of the
watershed. Above Stoystown, the water quality of Stony Creek
improves rapidly. Although numerous discharge points are located
above Stoystown, the cumulative effect is limited to localized
areas of degraded water quality. The upper area of the watershed
contains several streams which support varied forms of aquatic
life including stocked trout.
During the course of the field study, several stream locations
were sampled for chemical analysis (Table 33» Figure 21). These
stations were selected to measure the cumulative effects of mine
drainage. A summary of the stream data is presented in Table 3^.
-------
Station
Number
Table 33
Stream water quality sampling stations
Stony Creek Watershed
Sampling Period
Stream
Location
5379
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5475
5552
5553
Aug., Sept., Nov., 1968
Aug., Sept., Nov., 1958
Aug., Oct., Nov., 1968
Aug., Oct., Nov., 1958
Aug., Oct., Nov., 1968
Aug., Oct., Nov., 1968
Aug., Sept., Nov., 1968
Aug., Oct., Nov., 1968
Sept., Oct., Nov. 1968
Sept., Oct., Nov. 1968
Paint Creek
Shade Creek
Stony Creek
Quemahoning Creek
Unnamed trib. to
Stony Creek
Solomon Run
Quemahoning Creek
Unnamed trib. to
Stony Creek
Oven Run
Stony Creek
Near mouth
Near mouth
USGS gate @
Riverside
Near mouth
Near mouth
Near mouth
Above reservoir
Near mouth
Near mouth
At Stoystown
255
-------
ll
111 •
•x.
•s
H
a
01
vo CM >-H
CO 00 vO
CM
m -* en O
sO
r%. CM -^
•-4 rH
IA 00 CM
O rH 00
en r* oo
^r o CM
CM
CM
00 CX. >
.?<*£
ON ON O*
r-. r*. i^.
m en en
lA lA iA
00 CM lA
00 -« -1
CM CM
iA
CO SO iA
§o o
iA iA
•tf CM
fx r-l OS
ON en CM
lA lA IA
rH CM CM
ON r-t O
IA ^-» r^.
t-< — «
CO *n rH
IA r^ ~i
^H tn o
o> CM r*H
ON O •-»
so OO CM
rx i-*
r-- iA rH
r-i r*. r-
OO Os sO
CM CM »-)
O> 00 O
r^ IA IA
CM r*. ON
ss
CN CM CM
en en fO
tA U~> lA
O r-( O»
CM
O oo r*
O O ON
lA CM 00
r** en so
rH rH CM
CM r-* CM
VD s£) \O
O O O
O tf> O
en o O
000
rH t^. O
CM r-t en
00 ON CM
r^
ins
en en f^
sss
lA iA <-
ON \O
Os O
rH O
1 vO 00
t-l i-H
00 00
CM ON rv
r-» r-i t-t
rH O — »
CM en CM
o o o
§s^
t-l r~t r~4
ao c*i ~3
O O O
n oo
Op 00 00
« *o «
* » o>
60 U >
5*£
•* ON
CM CM
M"\ ON
en r-<
ON ^H
IA
1^ O
ON CM
t— 1 t-t
sO O
IA en
CM en
R2
fn CM
en ON
O en
CO rH
ON 00
t-t CM
\O ON
00 f-
CM rH
ON O>
fN. OO
CO CM
-H
r^ CN*
rH
IA O
CM O
ON p*.
00 ON
S8
r«* rH
IA en
200
\p
ON ON
II
sO vO
00 OO
en en
lA u-
^ IA m
CM en oo
CM o r*
IA en **
en *o CM
en en en
so o en
o Is- * ^
lA O O
** NO en
O en
38£
^o -o -o
l>. r*. r-
tA iA X
rH CM en
rH
CO O 1A
S rn" £
co 0 en
CM **
CO O Z
CM (M (M
lA IA lA
lA lA lA
lA "A IA
vO O lA
rH rH CM
VO CO f^-
l-H rH rH
SO IA 00
CM lA O
CM
en ON CM
O O rH
rH en r-t
rH rH
O f- rH
CM O rH
lA
$8$
en en en
lA »A *A
lA lA lA
tA lA »A
-------
-------
The sources of pollution inventoried in the Stony Creek sub-
basin were limited to those sources emanating from active or
abandoned coal mining operations. No attempts were made to docu-
ment pollutional discharges of a different source type. Although
mine drainage is the major source of pollution in the streams of
the Kiskiminetas River basin, pollution problems from sources other
than mine drainage do exist. The effects upon the water quality
of the Conemaugh River, Little Conemaugh River, and Stony Creek
from steel mill and other industrial discharges were not docu-
mented. During the course of the field study, discharges from
such sources were located along the banks of the above mentioned
streams. This was particularly evident in the Johnstown and nearby
community areas.
SOURCES OF MINE DRAINAGE
For description of the mine drainage sources located in the
Stony Creek watershed, the following section of this document is
divided into four separate parts. These include main stem Stony
Creek, Quemahoning Creek, Shade Creek, and Paint Creek. All mine
sites inventoried in the Stony Creek watershed are shown in Figure
22, following the source description section.
During early fall of 1971, a reinvestigation of the mine
drainage sources was conducted in the Shade Creek watershed. The
purpose of this reinvestigation was an attempt to locate sources
of mine drainage discharge which were not documented in this
258
-------
watershed during the initial survey. In preparation of the Shade
Creek portion of the Stony Creek report, it was determined that an
insufficient number of sources had been found in the headwater
areas of Shade Creek. In particular, the water quality of Dark
Shade Creek in the vicinity of Central City was degraded to a
degree which far exceeded the number of mine discharges inventoried
in that area. The reinvestigation effort was primarily centered
around the Central City area.
A total of twelve additional mine discharges were located in
the Central City area.' These sources contributed a combined acid
load exceeding 6.5 tons per day. Approximately one-half of this
acid load was discharged by the large drainway north of Central
City (see text). Discharge No.'s 5206 thru 5217 represent the
additional sources sampled during the 1971 reinvestigation of
Shade Creek.
STONY CREEK
Headwater Area
Mine No. 5513 >»s the farthest upstream source of mine drain-
age discharge in the Stony Creek watershed. An effluent of 15 gpm
discharged from the slope opening of this mine. The acid load re-
ceived by the headwaters of Stony Creek was 175 Ib/day.
In downstream order, the next mine discharges were located
on Reitz Creek. Mine No.'s 5511 and 5512 discharged a combined
acid load of 267 Ib/day. Mine No. 5511 was a caved drift mine
and Mine No. 5512 was a drift mine which had been intersected by
a surface mine.
259
-------
Glades Creek
Glades Creek drains a portion of the watershed which parallels
the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Several surface and underground mines
have been operative immediately adjacent to the turnpike. At the
time of survey, two drift mines were in operation. One of these
was the Burk Coal Company on the south side of the turnpike. The
mine was dry when inventoried and has since been abandoned and
sealed. The second mine was operated by Everett Snyder. This mine
is still in operation and reportedly dry.
Rhoads Creek
Two discharges (No.'s 5527 and 5528) contributed a combined
acid load of 231 Ib/day to Boone Run, a tributary to Rhoads Creek.
The source of these discharges was an abandoned slope mine. Sev-
eral additional minor sources of acid discharge were located on
Rhoads Creek and tributaries to Rhoads Creek. Two surface mines
were in operation at the time of survey. One of these operations
was dry and the other mine contributed an acid load of 127 Ib/day
(Mine No. 552U).
Schrock Run
In the U.9 square mile drainage area of Schrock Run, a
total of four discharging mine sites were located. Additional
underground and surface mines were inventoried in the Schrock
Run area; however, they were dry. Mine No. 5516 contributed the
major portion of the mine drainage discharge received by Schrock
Run. Mine No. 5516 is a small reclaimed area strip mine. A
260
-------
60 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage along the base of
the disturbed area carried an acid load of 2^0 Ib/day. Two sur-
face mines were in operation during the survey period and both
vere dry.
Grove Run
A small hilltop area surface mine is located along the north
bank of Grove Run in the headwater area. The mine is dry; however,
about UO feet below the disturbed area a 36 gpm artesian effluent
discharged to Grove Run. The acid load carried by this discharge
was 3^6 Ib/day.
Lamberts Run
The total acid load discharged to the 3.9 square mile drain-
age area of Lamberts Run was fkj Ib/day. Mine No. 5520 is a
stripped out drift mine. The major portion of the 63 gpm efflu-
ent measured at this site emanated from the area near the ori-
ginal mine portal. The acid load carried to Lamberts Run was
193 Ib/day. A similar effluent from Mine No. 5521 discharged an
acid load of 3l6 Ib/day. The last discharge found in the Lamberts
Run area resulted from an active surface mine. Settling ponds had
been constructed at this mine; however, no treatment was supplied.
The acid load was 238 Ib/day (Mine No. 5522).
Wells Creek
Mine No. 5^27 was located near the headwaters of Wells Creek.
There are two openings to the mine and both were discharging at
261
-------
the time of inspection. The combined effluent was 225 fpm which
carried an acid load of 1,215 Ib/day.
Two underground mine discharges (No.'s 5k2k and 5^25) were
located along Wells Creek near the small community of Wells
Creek. The 222 gpm effluent from Mine No. 5**2U discharged from
a mine which, according to a local resident, was in operation in
1895. The acid load-carried by this discharge was WtO Ib/day.
Mine No. 5^425 was a more recent underground mine which reportedly
intersected the workings of Mine No. 5k2k. The acid load dis-
charged by Mine No. 5^25 was 955'Ib/day.
Several additional underground mines and several surface
mines were located in the remaining downstream areas of Wells
Creek. However, these mines were either dry or discharged only
minor acid loads
Stony Creek, main stem
Several surface and underground mine operations were located
along the main stem of Stony Creek between Wells Creek and the
downstream confluence of Beaverdam Creek. The only source of
abandoned mine discharge resulted from Mine No. 5k8k. A 27 gpn
discharge from the base of this slumped drift opening carried an
acid load of 199 Ib/day to Stony Creek. At the time of survey, the
only other source of mine discharge resulted from an active surface
mine operation. The mine was located alon& the east bank of Stony
Creek (No. 5509), and contributed an acid load of 19 Ib/day.
262
-------
Beaverdam Creek
The water quality in the 19 square mile drainage area of
Beaverdam Creek is only moderately affected by mine drainage
discharges. The two discharging sources were both located near
the mouth of the tributary and contributed a combined acid load
of 259 Ib/day.
The 36? gpm discharge from Mine No. 555^ results from the
abandoned Reading No. 3 Mine. This effluent emerged from the
airway of the mine. The acid load was only 66 Ib/day; however,
the discharge imparted some discoloration to Beaverdam Creek.
Mine No. 5508 was the only other source of mine discharge
on this tributary. An acid load of 193 Ib/day was carried by
the 95 gpm effluent from this abandoned drift mine.
Stony Creek, main stem - Beaverdam Creek to Oven Run
Mine No. fs 5^2 and 5*4-83 are located on the east bank of
Stony Creek near the community of Kantner. Both mine openings
are located in an area of coal loading facilities approximately
50 yards downstream from the junction of Route 30 and County Road
5^6. The area in front of the openings was used for storage of
iJunk cars. The combined acid load discharged by these mines was
111 Ib/day.
Mine 5561 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek ap-
proximately 0.7 mile downstream of the two mines mentioned above.
There were several drift openings in the immediate area; however,
263
-------
only Mine No. 5561 had a significant discharge. The effluent was
2k gpm which carried an acid load of 173 Ib/day.
A series of drift mine discharges were located along the east
bank hillside downstream of Mine No. 55&1. These mines included
No.'s 5U8l, 5^85, and 5^6. The discharges measured at No.'s 5^5
and 5^36 drained from the portal and airway to a small semi-active
drift mine. The mine had been closed for failure to provide treat-
ment of the drainage; however, there were numerous loaded mine cars
in front of the portal. The combined acid load discharged by No.'s
51*85 and 5U86 was lJ+3 Ib/day.
Oven Run
Although only four sources of mine drainage discharge were
located in the seven square mile drainage area of Oven Run, the
water quality of the small tributary was seriously affected by
coal mine drainage. Cumulative seepage from the base of a re-
claimed surface mine was responsible for the major portion of the
acid load discharged to Oven Run. This was Mine No, 5^79 and con-
tributed an acid load of 353 Ib/day. Several surface mines were in
operation but were dry at inspection. The active underground Solar
No. 2 and No. 3 Mines operated in the Oven Run drainage area, but
were dry at inspection. A third drift mine was operated by the
Shubert and Kraylick Coal Company. The mine was dry at inspection
and since that date has been closed.
Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of Oven Run coin-
cident with the mine inventory survey. At this time, Oven Run at
the mouth, carried an acid load ranging from 1500 Ib/day to 2200
Ib/day (Table 3^, Station No. 5552).
26U
-------
Stony Creek, main stem - Oven Run to Fallen Timber Run
Five surface mines and at least 10 underground mine openings
were located on a small unnamed tributary to Stony Creek which
joins the main stem approximately 0.7 mile below Oven Run. The
major source of mine drainage discharge in this area resulted
from Mine No. 5^77. This mine is located at the headwaters of
the tributary and discharged an acid load of ^37 Ib/day. The re-
maining mine operations were either dry or contributed only neg-
ligible acid discharges.
A large refuse pile from the old underground Wilber Mine is
located on the east bank of Stony Creek just below the mouth of
the unnamed tributary mentioned above. The principal portion of
the Wilber Mine discharge (lUl gpm) was piped under Route 53 to
the preparation facility of the Solar Fuel Company. A portion of
this discharge was lime treated by Solar Fuel Company for use in
their facility. The pre-treatment acid load in this effluent
(No. 5**6U) was 1,2UU Ib/day. A second untreated discharge of 8 gpm
also discharged from the Wilber Mine. This was discharge No. 5^65
which carried an acid load of 69 Ib/day. According to a salvage
operator at the Wilber Mine, who once "pulled pillars" in the Wil-
ber Mine, the entire discharge from the mine was at one time piped
under Route 53. However, due to a roof fall within the mine, a
portion of the discharge is diverted and is not piped under the
road bed. A third discharge (No. 5^71) was attributed to seepage
from the refuse pile at the Wilber site. Although the cumulative
265
-------
seepage totalled only 3 gpm, the acidity concentration was 25,000 mg/1
with a resultant acid load of 900 Ib/day.
Ten drift mine openings were also located along the west bank
hills adjacent to this section of Stony Creek. However, all of
these mines were dry.
Fallen Timber Run
Two surface mines and two underground mines were located in
the 2.5 square mile drainage area of Fallen Timber Run. All of
these operations were abandoned and dry. However, small seepage
increments from the surface mines contributed an undetermined
amount of mine drainage to Fallen Timber Run.
Stony Creek, main stem - Hooversville to Hollsopple
An unnamed tributary, which drains the area north and east
of Hooversville, was grossly polluted by acid mine drainage.
Mine No. 5^57 was the first of three major discharges located on
this tributary. The 120 gpm effluent from Mine No. 5^57 resulted
from a point of intersection between a surface and underground mine.
The underground mine was reportedly the Baker Whitely No. 2 Mine.
The acid load carried by the discharge was 6U8 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5^56 is located on the opposite bank of the tribu-
tary just a short distance downstream from Mine No. 5^57. The 215
gpm discharge at this site emerged from the base of a slumped drain-
way adjacent to a large abandoned mine tipple. This discharge
drains from the Whitely No. 1 Mine. The original portal to this
266
-------
mine is located a short distance downstream of the tipple but was
bricked shut and dry.
The third major discharge on this tributary resulted from
the Knickerbocker No. 1 mine located near the mouth of the tribu-
tary. This was Mine No. 5^55 which discharged an effluent of 180
gpm from the still open drift mouth.
An acitive drift mine was in operation near the headwaters of
this tributary. This was the George Hritz Mine which is located
in the base of a strip mine high wall. A minimal amount of seep-
age {l gpm) was observed at the time of inspection. However, this
seepage appeared to result more from the strip mine than from the
underground mine. The mine is still active and reportedly dry.
Stream sampling was conducted at the mouth of this unnamed
tributary coincident with the mine inventory survey. During this
period, the tributary at mouth carried an acid load ranging from
1,700 Ib/day to 2,000 Ib/day (Table 33, Station No. 538U).
Mine No. 5^66 is located on another unnamed tributary to
Stony Creek. The acid load discharged by this mine was 3*
-------
Five additional discharging mines were located in the area
downstream of the above mentioueu mines. Three of these were in
the vicinity of Blough, one at Landstreet, and one near Hollsopple.
However, none of these mines contributed significant acid loads to
Stony Creek.
Stony Creek, main stem - Hollsopple to mouth of Shade Creek
The only major source of mine drainage discharge along this
section of Stony Creek resulted from Mine No. 5504. This drift
mine is located at the tip of a one mile contour surface mine.
The surface mine has not intersected the drift mine portal; how-
ever, it has probably created points of intersection between the
two operations along a>he face of the hill. The discharge measured
at the mine opening was 270 gpm which carried an acid load of 1,037
Ib/day.
Stony Creek, main stem - Shade Creek to Rdnt Creek
Mine No. 5502 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek
just below the confluence of Shade Creek. A series of three drift
mines were located along the face of the hillside. Two were dry
and the other contributed a discharge of U20 gpm which carried an
acid load of 3,830 Ib/day.
Downstream of Mine No. 5502 a contour surface mine was located
on an unnamed tributary to Stony Creek. Although there were no
direct discharges emanating from the surface mine, the tributary
268
-------
was affected by cumulative seepage which occurred at the base of
the disturbed area. A sample collected below the mine indicated
that the tributary carried an acid load of 256 Ib/day (No. 5503).
On the west bank of Stony Creek, two mine openings were lo-
cated on the steep hill slope several hundred feet above the
stream. The openings apparently represent points where the under-
ground mine broke through to the surface. The 130 gpm effluent
(No. 5*<-2l) spreads over a wide area destroying all trees and veg-
etation as the drainage cascades down the hillside. The acid load
contributed by this source was 87^ Ib/day.
Mine No. 5501, located on the east bank, is similar to Mine
No. 5U21 mentioned above. Mine No. 5501 is located on the hill-
side approximately 200 vertical feet above stream level. The
acid load carried by the 90 gpm effluent was 386 Ib/day.
A small dam is located on Stony Creek approximately 1.5 miles
above the confluence with Baint Creek. At this site, water is with-
drawn from Stony Creek and subjected to lime neutralization. The
treated water is then piped via large culverts through the surround-
ing hillsides for industrial use in Johnstown.
Stony Creek| main stem - Baint Creek to Bens Creek
The first acid load discharged to Stony Creek below the con-
fluence of Paint Creek emanated from one of the several tunnels
which carries water from the various areas of the Stony Creek
watershed to the steel mills in Johnstown.
269
-------
Source No. 5^20 is located on the west bank of Stony Creek
less than one mile below the confluence of Paint Creek. Entrance
to the tunnel is prohibited by an iron gate. At the base of the
gate an iron discolored discharge of 10 gpm was sampled. The
acid load of this effluent was 26 Ib/day.
Several underground mine discharges were located on an un-
named tributary which enters Stony Creek at Ingleside. Mine
No.'s 53W* and 53^6 discharged acid loads of l6l Ib/day and 359
Ib/day, respectively.
Three additional drift mine discharges (Mine No.'s 53^1, 53^2,
53^3) were located on the next unnamed downstream tributary to
Stony Creek. The combined acid load of these discharges was
1,1^7 Ib/day.
An active drift mine operated by the J & R Sales Coal Company
(formerly East Windber Coal Company) was locate 1 on the West bank
of Stony Creek directly across from the three mines mentioned above.
At the time of inventory, this mine (No. 5^22) contributed an un-
treated effluent which carried an acid load of 590 Ib/day. At the
present time, this mine now provides treatment of its mine discharge.
An acid load of 2,398 Ib/day was discharged to Stony Creek by
an abandoned mine opening located just downstream and on the bank
opposite from the large refuse pile operated by the Island Creek
Coal Company (formerly the Bird Coal Company). The measured efflu-
ent from this mine (No. 5338) was 120 gpm.
270
-------
A discharge of 75 gpm from the abandoned Bird Coal No. 1 Mine
on Soap Hollow was one of two remaining discharges along the Paint
Creek to Bens Creek section of Stony Creek. At the time of sampling,
the acid load from Mine No. 5^13 was 315 Ib/day. Approximately O.U
mile downstream, an effluent of 1,309 gpm from the active Bird No. 2
Mine was discharged to Soap Hollow. At the time of sampling, this
discharge carried an acid load of U,63^ Ib/day. However, according
to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, this mine now
provides adequate treatment of its mine drainage.
Bens Creek
The major portion of the mine drainage discharged to the Bens
Creek watershed is received by the South Fork of the tributary. A
total of eight discharges were located near the headwaters of the
South Fork just north of the community of Jerome. All of the dis-
charges emanated from abandoned sites. The total acid load dis-
charged by the eight sources was 3,527 Ib/day. Mine No.'s 5^07
and 5^H> abandoned drift mines, contributed the major portion of
this acid load. The acid loads were 909 Ib/day and 2,231 Ib/day,
respectively.
The only other source of mine drainage discharge located in
the Bens Creek watershed was found on the main stem of the tribu-
tary just below the confluence of the North and South Forks. Mine
No. 5^0U was an abandoned drift mine adjacent to Route 219. The
-271
-------
acid load discharged to Bens Creek was 180 Ib/day.
Stream water quality determinations were conducted on Stony
Creek at the USGS gage at Riverside. During the sampling period,
Stony Creek carried an acid load ranging from 9,50U Ib/day to
3^2,792 Ib/day.
Stony Creek, east bank - Bens Creek to Mouth
Mine No.'s 5335, 5336, and 5337 are located along the east
bank of Stony Creek almost at stream level. It appears that these
discharges represent points where underground mines broke through
to the surface for either the installation of an air way or as a
means of dewatering the mine. The acid loads discharged by these
three sources were 69 Ib/day, l6l Ib/day, and 28 Ib/day, respectively.
Below the area described above, Stony Creek has been channel-
ized along its remaining downstream length. Several large acid dis-
charges were located along the base of the channelization project.
At several of the discharge points the remains of old mine openings
could be located on the hillside above Stony Creek. However, at
several sites, particularly in the greater Johnstown area, no in-
dication of the original mine opening was found. At these sites,
the mine drainage emerged from concrete drainways at the base of
the channelized stream bed. Such discharges included No.'s 5330,
5331 and 533*1. The combined acid load of these effluents was
Ib/day.
272
-------
The largest acid discharge in this section of Stony Creek
was the 3,312 Ib/day load from Mine No. 5333. A discharge of
W30 gpm was measured at the base of a caved drift mine opening.
There are actually two openings at this site; however, the second
opening was dry.
Stony Creek, west bank - Bens Creek to Mouth
Three alkaline effluents were sampled from drainways along
the base of the channelized stream bed on the west bank of Stony
Creek near Roxbury. Th^ exact origin of these effluents is not
known. These three sources (No.'s 5^17, 5*H8, 5^19) discharged
a combined alkaline load of U33 Ib/day.
No. 5Hl6 contributed an acid load of 203 Ib/day to Stony
Creek. The effluent was collected from a drainway near stream
level. The exact origin is unknown but assumed to result from
an underground mine.
The largest acid load in the entire U66 square mile drainage
area of Stony Creek was found along the west bank of the stream
almost directly across from Point ftirk in downtown Johnstown. On
the west bank hillside, a series of three sealed mine openings
were located. The mines are dry at the seal; however, about 75
feet below one of the seals a 630 gpm effluent discharged to Stony
Creek. At the time of sampling, the acid load was 26,838 Ib/day
(Mine No. 5*U5).
273
-------
QUEMAHONING CREEK
Quemahoning Creek drains a 93.8 square mile area on the west
side of the Stony Creek watershed. The water quality of Quemahoning
Creek is affected by numerous mine discharges throughout the drain-
age area. However, the water quality of this tributary is less
severely degraded than the water quality in other areas of the
Stony Creek watershed,,
Quemahoning Creek, headwaters area
One abandoned underground mine was located at the very head-
waters of Quemahoning Creek north of Somerset. The mine was com-
pletely caved, grown over, and dry. There were no additional
mines in the headwater area above the small community of Harrison
(Quecreek).
Mine No. 5399 discharged an acid load of 917 Ib/day to Que-
mahoning Creek at Harrison. The 235 gpm effluent flows from a
drainage pipe adjacent to the mine tipple and loading area. The
area behind the old mine has been surface mined. The original
mine opening^ have been filled or covered by the surface mine
operation. Another stripped out drift mine (Ho. 5^00) was located
almost directly across from Mine No. 5399. The acid load discharged
to the receiving tributary was 15 Ib/day. A dovered shaft opening
Mas located approximately 0.8 mile upstream of Mine No. 5399. No
additional information concerning this opening was available at
the time of survey.
syt
-------
Quemahoning Creels-Harrison to Acosta
A total of seven drift mine openings were located along the
west bank of Quemahoning Creek between the communities of Harrison
and Acosta. These openings were all located at the base of the
hillside and were dry at the time of inspection.
Five surface mines and one drift mine opening were found
along the east bank of the creek. The surface mines were dry
and the one drift mine (Mo. 5397) discharged an acid load of 51
Ib/day.
Quemahoning Creek, Acosta to North Branch
Both surface mines and underground mine openings were lo-
cated along this section of Quemahoning Creek. Four of the drift
mines were discharging at the time of inspection. Mine No.'s 5398
and 539U were located along the main stem of Quemahoning Creek and
discharged a total acid load of only 11 Ib/day. Mine No.'s 5395
and 5396 were located on an unnamed tributary to Quemahoning Creek.
The acid loads discharged by these mines were 20 Ib/day and 75 Ib/day,
respectively.
North Branch
Thirteen drift mines and approximately 12 surface mines were
located in the 25 square mile drainage area of North Branch. In
addition, there may have been several shaft mine entries in the
area. All of these mine operations, both surface and underground,
were dry at the time of inspection.
275
-------
Qucmahoning Creek, North Branch to Beaverdam Creek
There were no significant discharges of mine drainage along
this section of Quemahoning Creek. The large slope or shaft mine
at Jenners was dry.
Beaverdam Creek
Mine drainage discharges in the Beaverdam Creek area were
limited to three minor sources near the headwaters of the stream.
Mine No. 5555 was a combination mine. A drift opening was at one
time located in the Highwall of an abandoned surface mine. Both
the strip pit and underground mine opening were flooded. A one
gpm effluent was discharged from the base of a slumped drift
1
opening at Mine No. 5557. The combined acid load discharged by
Mine No.'s 5555 and 5557 was only 8 Ib/day.
The 12 gpm effluent sampled at Strip Mine No. 5556 represented
a treated discharge. Two seepage areas had occurred below the dis-
turbed area. At the time of inspection, the coal company had chan-
neled this drainage to a series of small impoundments for treatment
with soda ash. After treatment the final effluent still carried an
acid load of 91 Ib/day.
Quemahoning Creek, Beaverdam Creek to Roaring Run
Old Stoughton Lake is located at the mouth of Beaverdam Creek.
This tributary feeds the lake which, in turn, subsequently dis-
charges to Quemahoning Creek. There is no visible sign of mine
276
-------
water inflow to Stoughton Lake. However, the lake appears visually
affected by mine drainage. A local resident reported that the lake
is fed by a sub-surface artesian discharge emanating from the near-
by Boswell Mine. The Somerset 15 minute topographic map indicates
another mine opening was at one time located in the immediate vi-
cinity of what is now Stoughton Lake. An estimated overflow of
250 gpm from the lake discharged to Quemahoning Creek. This ef-
fluent (No. 5559) had an acidity concentration of 255 mg/1 and
carried an acid load of 765 Ib/day.
There were no additional sources of mine drainage discharge
along this section of Quemahoning Creek. Several underground
mines, including the Boswell Mine, and one surface mine were in-
spected in the area but were dry.
Roaring Run
A recently surface mined area near the headwaters of Roaring
Run discharged an acid load of 133 Ib/day (No. 5558) to the tribu-
tary. The 90 gpm discharge resulted from spoil pile seepage and
drainage from the open pit. Treatment facilities had been con-
structed; however, the drainage was by-passing the facility.
Discharge No.'s 5376 and 5560 are located near the mouth of
Roaring Run. The discharges do not flow directly from a mine site
but are small artesian discharges along the bank of roaring Run.
A local resident reported that there were numerous "seeps" in the
immediate area and these discharges were responsible for the dis-
coloration observed in the lower reach of Roaring Run. The acid
277
-------
loads from discharge No.'s 5376 and 5560 were 65 Ib/day and 30 Ib/day,
respectively.
A small drift mine, operated by Mike Budzina, was located
near the mouth of Roaring Run. The mine was dry at inspection. The
mine is presently still in operation and reportedly dry.
Quemahoning Creek, below Roaring Run
Only one source of mine drainage discharge was located along
Quemahoning Creek below Roaring Run and above the point where
Quemahoning Creek empties into Quemahoning Reservoir. The drain-
age originated from a water well located below a surface mined
area. Prior to mining of the area, this well served as a water
supply; however, the quality of the water was affected by the
surface mining. At the time of sampling, the 18 gpm discharge
carried an acid load of ihQ Ib/day (No. 5375).
Twomile Run
Twomile Run is one of three tributaries which form Quemahoning
Reservoir. Both surface and underground mine operations were loca-
ted in the Twomile Run drainage area. A total of five mine dis-
charges contributed a total source acid load of 313 Ib/day. Mine
No.'s 5387 and 5388 discharged the major portion of this load.
Mine No. 5387 contributed an acid load of 78 Ib/day. All that
remains of the original drift portal is a slump in the hillside.
278
-------
An acid load of 1^9 Ib/day was discharged by Mine No. 5388. The
source of this 10 gpm effluent was two slumped drift mine openings.
The sample represents cumulative seepage collected below the old
openings.
Higgins Run
Higgins Run is the third tributary which empties into Que-
mahoning Reservoir. Coal mine operations were almost totally ab-
sent in this 5.8 square mile drainage area. Only one mine operation
was located and this mine produced an alkaline effluent. This was
Mine No. 5377 which contributed an alkaline load of 13 Ib^/day.
Quemahoning Creek below Reservoir
The only mine sites located below Quemahoning Reservoir were
on an unnamed tributary which enters Quemahoning Creek just above
its confluence with Stony Creek. Several underground mines were
inspected on this tributary near the community of Jerome; however,
they were dry.
SHADE CREEK
Shade Creek drains a 98.U square mile area on the east side
of the Stony Creek watershed. The water quality of main stem
Shade Creek is seriously affected by coal mine discharges over
its entire length. Shade Creek is formed by the confluence of
its two principal tributaries, Clear Shade Creek and Dark Shade
Greek. Clear Shade Creek is unaffected by coal mine discharges
while Dark Shade Creek received numerous mine drainage discharges.
279
-------
DARK SHADE CREEK
Headwaters area
Dark Shade Creek is formed by the confluence of Shingle Run
and Coal Run. There were no coal mine operations on Shingle Run.
However, several surface mines and one underground mine were lo-
cated at the very headwaters of Coal Run near the community of
Gahagen. The opening to the underground mine at Gahagan has
caved and there was no drainage at this point. Although the
refuse pile from this mine is in continual contact with Coal Run,
the water quality of the stream was not seriously affected. A
large surface mine is located on the east bank of Coal Run approxi-
mately two miles downstream of Gahagen. This surface mine was in-
active; however, refuse from a nearby coal preparation plant was
trucked to the surface mine and buried in the previously unreclaimed
strip cuts. A drift mine operated by the J & R Sales Company was
also associated with the preparation plant. This mine did not con-
tribute any discharge to Coal Run.
The first source of drainage to enter Dark Shade Creek resulted
from a coal refuse disposal area. This 30 gpm effluent entered the
main stem a short distance below the confluence of Coal Run and
Shingle Run. This refuse is trucked to the disposal site from
another preparation plant located in Central City. The acid load
discharged to Dark Shade Creek was 1,836 Ib/day (No. 521?). This
single effluent was responsible for a complete reversal in the
280
-------
physical appearance of Dark Shade Creek. Above this point, the
stream bed was clear. However, below the point of drainage inflow
the stream bed as well as the stream banks were grossly discolored.
Dark Shade Creek, Central City area
A large abandoned mine effluent of 875 gpm was located on
Dark Shade Creek in the community of Central City. This effluent
drains from a culvert on the property associated with the prepara-
tion plant which still operates in Central City. The large mine
at this site has been abandoned; however, surface mines in the
general area truck coal to this site for preparation prior to
loading in rail cars. A local resident reported that this drainage
emanated from the Franklin No. h mine. The drainage enters Dark
Shade Creek directly behind the Central City Fire Station. The
acid load was U,515 Ib/day (Mine No. 5293).
Dark Shade Creek, below Central City
The largest source of mine drainage discharge in the Shade
Creek watershed is located on Dark Shade Creek only a short dis-
tance below the mouth of Little Dark Shade Creek. At this point,
a 2,889 gpn effluent was located in a somewhat swampy area between
the railroad tracks and the stream. The effluent drains from a
concrete structure located at ground level approximately two feet
in height and eight feet in width. The origin of this discharge
is unknown but it has obviously been constructed in order to drain
a nearby mine. The acid load carried to Dark Shade Creek was
6,93^ Ib/day (Ho. 5215).
281
-------
Laurel Run
Laurel Run enters Dark Shade Creek a short distance below
Mine Ho. 5215 described above. According to a local resident, a
drift mine on the south bank of this tributary was originally
sealed by the Works Progress Administration. However, the area
was reaffected by later surface mine operations. At the time of
inspection, this U5 gpra effluent (Mine No. 5282) discharged an
acid load of 13^ Ib/day to Laurel Run. An active drift mine op-
erated by the Ripple Coal Company was located on Beaverdaia Run, a
tributary to Laurel Run. At the time of inspection, this mine was
dry and since that date the mine has closed and still remains dry.
Two surface mine discharges were also located on Laurel Run.
A 95 gpm effluent representing cumulative seepage from strip mine
spoil piles carried an acid load of U50 Ib/day to Laurel Run (Mine
No. 5283). A second surface mine effluent discharged an acid load
of 97 Ib/day (Mine No. 528^). A drift mine operated by the Horse-
shoe Coal Company was in operation in this general area. At the
time of inspection, the mine was dry. According to information
supplied by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources,
this mine has now been closed and remains dry.
There are numerous refuse areas along main stem Dark Shade
Creek and along State Route 160 which generally parallels the
stream in this area. Much of the area is also quite swampy and
in many areas this refuse has been scattered throughout the swamp
areas. As a result of leaching from these refuse areas, there are
282
-------
numerous small impoundments of highly acid water. In places, por-
tions of Laurel Run are also diverted through and around the refuse
and swamp areas. Several of the small impoundments discharged
highly acid effluents. No. 5211 represented t.uch a discharge.
This 20 gpm effluent drained to Laurel Run above the point where
the stream runs through the swamp area. The acid load was 2,880
Ib/day. A similar effluent was located just below the mouth of
Laurel Run on the east bank of Dark Shade Creek. At this point,
a 15 gpm effluent discharged from a four inch pipe which carried
impounded drainage under Route 160. The acid load contributed by
this discharge was 977 Ib/day (Ho.
Dark Shade Creek, Cairnbrook area
Below the confluence of Laurel Run an abandoned mine effluent
of 200 gpm discharged to Dark Shade Creek. The opening has been
closed and the drainage emerges from the base of the sealed open-
ing. This was Mine No. 529^ which carried an acid load of 677 lb/
day.
An effluent of 23 gpm was collected at the base of the large
refuse pile at Cairnbrook. This effluent represents cumulative
seepage about the base of the refuse pile. The acid load from this
source was 121 Ib/day (No. 5213).
Dark Shade Creek, Reitz area
A series of mine effluents were located along the east bank
283
-------
of Dark Shade Creek north of the small community of Reitz. It
appears that underground mines have operated in three separage
coal seams and in addition, the upper seam has also been surface
mined. Only one of these effluents, No. 5207» was associated
with the surface mine. The acid load was only 8 Ib/day. The
other four discharges, Mine No.'s 5206, 5208, 5209, and 5210
were associated with abandoned drift mines. The combined acid
load from these four sources was 306 Ib/day.
Miller Run
Miller Run is a tributary to Dark Shade Creek and joins the
stream just above the confluence of Dark Shade Creek with Clear
Shade Creek. An active air fen was located near the headwaters
of Miller Run but it had no affect upon the water quality of
Miller Run. One active and one abandoned surface mine were in-
spected in the general upstream area, but were dry. However,
the water quality of Miller Run is immediately degraded over its
remaining downstream length as a result of several discharges
which occurred on the west bank of the tributary. A total of
four discharges were located at a combined surface and underground
mine site. The surface mine is approximately 1.5 mile in length
and contains several drift mine openings. In addition, the south-
east tip of the surface mine was active. The combined source acid
load measured at this s'te was 319 Ib/day. Mine No. 528? was an
active drift mine which contributed a small portion (15 Ib/day) of
28U
-------
the total 319 Ib/day acid load. This drift mine has installed a
small treatment facility and produces an alkaline effluent.
The Solar Fuel No. k mine also operates in the general area
described above. lib discharge was collected from this mine at
the time of inspection. According to State information, the
Solar Fuel No. k mine has a discharge and provides adequate
treatment.'
Below the area of mine discharges described above, Miller
Run had pH and conductivity values of 3.1 and 1,000 micromhos/cm,
respectively.
Several surface mines and an abandoned underground mine
were located near the mouth of Miller Run. However, these mines
contributed no drainage to Miller Run.
CLEAR SHADE CREEK
Clear Shade Creek is unaffected by coal mine discharges.
The only mine site located within the 31.U square mile sub-watershed
area was a surface mine high on the hillside along the south bank
of the tributary. This surface mine also extends around the face
of the hill and into the Dark Shade Creek drainage area. Most of
this surface operation had been reclaimed and only a small active
segment had not been reclaimed.
SHADE CREEK
Discharge No. 51t03 represents the first source of mine
285
-------
drainage inflow to Shade Creek below the confluence of Dark Shade
Creek and Clear Shade Creek. The 2k gpm effluent actually repre-
sents the entire flow of a small wet weather tributary to Shade
Creek. The upper end of the tributary was clear but near its
confluence with Shade Creek it became noticeably discolored. The
immediate area has been deep mined and perhaps some seepage is
responsible for the idiscoloration of the intermittent tributary.
The load discharged to Shade Creek was alkaline.
The discharge from Mine No. 5289 apparently resulted from a
very old and covered drift mine.- The only remaining evidence to
suggest the presence of the mine is a refuse pile. A 12 gpm ef-
fluent emanating from the general area of the refuse pile carried
an acid load of 31 Ib/day.
Discharge No. 5^02 contributed an acid load of 72 Ib/day to
Shade Creek. This effluent is actually another small intermittent
tributary, similar to No. 5^03, which becomes discolored near its
confluence with Shade Creek.
Roaring Fork
Roaring Fork was unaffected by coal mine discharges over most
of its drainage area. In fact there were no coal mine operations
above the small community of Arrow. At this point, Roaring Fork
exhibited pH and conductivity values of 7.6 and 60 micromhos/cm,
respectively. An abandoned and caved drift mine at Hagevo con-
tributed the first source of mine drainage pollution in the Roaring
Fork drainage area. The acid load discharged by this source (Mine
No. 5551) was 165 Ib/day. At the time of survey, there were several
286
-------
active surface mines in the Roaring Fork drainage area; however,
they were dry. On* additional underground mine opening was lo-
cated, but it was also dry.
An active drift mine operated by Desort Coal Company was lo-
cated nc r the mouth of Roaring Fork on the north bank of the
tributary. The mine vas dry.
Shade Creek below Roaring Fork
Two active drift mine operations were located on an unnamed
tributary which enters Shade Creek on the west bank just north of
Hillsboro. One of these mines was the Dalton Run No. 2 mine. The
active portal was dry; however, a 20 gpm effluent discharged from
a nearby caved drift opening. This was Mine No. 5281 and the acid
load was 91 Ib/day.
The second active mine was operated by the Potochar and
Potochar Coal Company. The operation was dry at inspection and
according to information supplied by the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources, the mine is still active and dry at
this time (fall 1971).
Several additional drift mine openings were found along the
west bank of Shade Creek below the area mentioned above. However,
these operations were dry at the time of inspection.
Four sources of abandoned mine drainage were located on an
unnamed tributary which enters Shade Creek on the east bank immedi-
ately below the mouth of Spruce Run. A contour surface mine extends
along the length of this unnamed tribertary. Underground openings have
also been developed within this surface mined area. Discharges from the
287
-------
unreclaimed strip mine spoil piles and drainage from the drift
openings contributed a total source acid load of 105 Ib/day.
Spruce Run
The water quality of Spruce Run is degraded over nearly its
entire length as a result of seepage areas occurring at the base
of several surface mines. There were no significant point dis-
charges at the time of inventory on Spruce Run, However, the
water quality of the tributary gradually deteriorates to the point
where the mouth of Spruce Run exhibited a pH value of 3.U. On6
drift mine was operated by the Hoffman Coal Company. The mine was
dry when inspected and has since ceased operation.
Shade Creek below Spruce Run
A long contour surface mine is located along the south bank
of Shade Creek below the mouth of Spruce Run. This surface mine
is in the vicinity of the abandoned No. 38 Mine of the Berwind
White Coal Company. An active drift mine was in operation within
the surface mine. Two discharges were collected from separate
drainage points emanating from this mine. The total acid load
discharged to Shade Creek was 93 Ib/day. Several additional dry
mine openings were found in the vicinity of the surface mine.
These openings may have been part of the original No. 38 mine.
The mines described above were the last downstream sites
found along the south bank of Shade Creek. There were no mine
sites on the north bank of Shade Creek below Spruce Run.
288
-------
At the time of survey, Shade Creek at the mouth carried an
acid load ranging from 2U,373 Ib/day to U3,35^ Ib/day. (Table 31*,
Station No. 538l).
BAINT CREEK
Much of the 37 square mile drainage area of Paint Creek has
been subjected to extensive coal mine operations. Several of these
operations were large underground mine complexes operated by the
Berwind White Coal Company.
Headwaters Area
The water quality in the headwaters area of Paint Creek was
affected by an acid load of 292 Ib/day resulting from cumulative
seepage about the base of a strip mine; This was Mine No. 530U.
The strip mine intersects the drainage divide separating the
Little Conemaugh River and the Stony Creek drainage areas. Addi-
tional surface and several drift mines were located in this head-
water area. However, these mines were dry or contributed only
minor acid loads.
Paint Creek-main stem
Four mine drainage discharges were located within a contour
surface mine along the south bank of Paint Creek. This mine is
approximately four miles in length and crosses Babcock Creek. The
four discharge points all represent points of intersection between
surface and underground mines. In addition to these sources, there
289
-------
were many other points of intersection which were dry at the time
of inspection. The combined acid load discharged by the four
sources (No.'s 5306, 5307, 5309, 5310) was 593 Ib/day.
The abandoned No. h2 mine of the Berwind White Coal Company
is located along the north bank of Paint Creek upstream of Bab-
cock Creek. All the mine facilities have been removed or de-
stroyed and only the sealed portal indicates the presence of
Mine No. ^2. A second opening to this mine was located on the
south bank of Paint Creek in another (higher) coal seam. This
portal was destroyed by the surface mine described above. At
the time of inventory an active surface mine was in operation
along the north bank of Paint Creek below Mine No. U2; however,
the operation was dry.
The Berwind White No. 36 mine was located along the bank of
Paint Creek just east of the town of Windber. At least six under-
ground mine openings, including a sealed portal, and several large
refuse piles are associated with the No. 36 complex. Two of the
mine openings contributed significant acid discharges to Paint
Creek. These were Mine No.'s 5311 and 5312. The combined acid
loads were 536 Ib/day.
Seese Run
Seese Run is one of the three major tributaries to Paint
Creek. Three underground mines and one combination surface and
underground mine were located in the Seese Run drainage area. The
290
-------
combination mine was the only source of drainage. At this site, a
15 gpm effluent discharged from what remained of a drift opening
intersected by the surface operation. The acid load from Mine
No. 531^ was 97 Ib/day.
Weaver Run
Contour surface mines are located along both banks of Weaver
Run in the headwaters area. These mines have intersected older
underground operations and additional drift mine openings were
developed in the highwall of the surface mine. Portions of the
disturbed surface area have been reclaimed and other areas have
been abandoned without reclamation. A combined acid load of
61*3 Ib/day was discharged by four sources within this area. These
were No.fs 5315, 5316, 5317, and 5319. An additional acid load of
1*7 Ib/day was discharged by a test cut area separate from the above
area.
Paint Creek
Mine No. 5320 was the first contributing source of mine drain-
age below the confluence of Seese Run and Weaver Run with Baint
Creek. A small refuse pile and a hillside indentation is all that
remains to mark the site of this old drift mine. The acid load
discharged to Paint Creek was 5** Ib/day. A contour surface mine
was located above Mine No. 5320 in a higher coal seam. However,
at inspection, this mine was dry along its entire length.
291
-------
An active drift mine was in operation along the south bank of
Faint Creek, a short distance below Mine No. 5320. This small drift
mine was operated by the Country Club Coal Company. The mine was dry
at inspection and is presently operating under similar conditions.
A large abandoned mine discharge is located a short distance
below the Country Club Mine. This was Mine No. 5380 located in a
residential area within the small community of Paint. The measured
effluent at this sice was 956 gpm which carried an acid load of
3,556 Ib/day.
Little Paint Creek
Little Paint Creek enters Paint Creek in the community of
Scalp Level. Little Paint Creek is unaffected by mine drainage in
the entire portion of the drainage area above Scalp Level. Two
abandoned air shafts were found in this area but there were no
sources of mine drainage discharge.
The Berwind White Coal Company operated a very large mine in
Scalp Level until 1962. At that time, ownership was transferred to
the Jandy Coal Company. Jandy Coal operates this mine at the present
time. This operation is primarily involved in retreat mining and not
advanced mining. As a result, the Commonwealth does not consider
Jandy Coal responsible for the drainage emanating from the mine portal.
At the time of inspection, an 8U gpm effluent was measured. This dis-
charge carried an acid load of 51^ Ib/day (Mine No. 5191). Jandy Coal
also operates the coal washery associated with this mine. During the
course of field operations in the Scalp Level area, it was often
292
-------
observed that Little Baint Creek carried an excessive amount of
coal fines. In at least one instance, these coal fines were
traced to a discharge emanating from the coal washery (No. 53^7).
Baint Creek below Little Paint Creek
The abandoned Eureka No. 30 Mine contributed an acid load of
70 Ib/day: This mine (No. 5322) is located along the south bank
of Faint Creek. Mine No. 532^ is another abandoned drift mine
discharge located on the south bank. The acid load discharged by
this source was 12k Ib/day.
An active drift mine was in operation high on the hillside
almost directly above abandoned Mine No. 532^. This active drift
mine was the Shade Valley No. 5 Mine. The operation was dry at
the time of inspection.
The Berwind White No. 37 Mine was located on the north bank
of Baiint Creek near the mouth of the tributary. Three sources of
mine drainage discharge were located in the immediate vicinity of
Mine No. 37. Two of these sources, No.'s 5328 and 5329> were
located along the bank of Paint Creek. The combined acid load
from these two sources was 1,056 Ib/day.
The third mine opening was located on an unnamed tributary
to Paint Creek. The discharge from this partially open mine mouth
was l8o gpm which carried an acid load of 1,771 Ib/day. (Mine
No. 5327).
293
-------
Stream sampling was conducted near the mouth of Paint Creek
coincident with the mine drainage inventory. At that time, Paint
Creek carried an acid load ranging from lU,372 Ib/day to 30,055 Ib/day.
(Table 3U, Station No. 5379).
ACTIVE MINES
At the time of the Stony Creek study, approximately ^0 coal
mines were active in the watershed. The majority of these sites
were dry surface mines located in the headwater areas of the water-
shed. A total of five active surface mines contributed drainage at
the time of inspection. The combined acid load from these sources
was 58U Ib/day (Table 35). All but one of these discharges repre-
sented untreated drainage emanating directly from the active area
of the operation. Discharge No. 5556 represents a treated effluent
of cumulative seepage below a surface mined area. The mine had
ceased operation and the area had been backfilled. After reclama-
tion, two seepage areas had occurred below the backfilled area.
This seepage was collected and treated prior to discharge to an
unnamed tributary of Beaverdam Creek. The acid load carried by
the treated effluent was 91 Ib/day.
Four active underground mines contributed a total of six ef-
fluents. Two of these mines were responsible for two separate
effluents. The combined acid load from these six sources was
5,8U6 Ib/day. Treatment facilities have been installed on three
of these effluents. They include No.'s 5287, 5378, and 5*»22.
-------
m
co
a
5
EH
§>
n
C TJ
3 r-
0) «->
CO >-
0) n
C -d
td ^
C
O <•>
to >
H n)
•d
rH -^
CtJ X
0 v-'
H
C*
§
4) ^
b 4) >
JJ jJ n
09 Cd TE
a1 ?5
•H CO ^
•H
41
O
4)
>J CO /••
w o> >
>S "JS rH 4) B
ja « cd C -d
jj ^rt ^^
W £ 0 to f.
°rl jl*
*d *^
a) O
o *J u /-,
rH CO J . >
2 JJ to
4) -H "d
60 rH T> ^
cd cd -H rfs
C 4J O rH
jd H
-d
4)
C
Sj 0)
£ 60
rH }j <->
* 2 e
4J J3 O
O O 61
EH CO ^^
Q
CO
0 U
• 3
O O
2 CO
e
td
4)
V4
4J
CO
01
C
^
•H
4)
U
VO
ON
CO
1-4
QS
CO
Csj
Cs|
CO
CM
4,
O
rH
CM
CO
CO
fX.
r-4
C^
M
rH
00
VO
m
n
o
m
o
CO
«*"
O
^
Q)
4)
^
B
O
4J
CO
VO
CO
CM
rH
O
rH
ON
ON
co
m
\o
rH
00
co
0t
ON
O
rH
A
00
rH
CM
VO
«t
rH
ON
^
4)
2
U
4J
C
•H
O ' co r«- m
CM CM rH
«J ^ O ON
• rH
O rH r>> rH
VO rH CO
CO CM «* ON
CO O 00 O
CO CM. vO ON
rH '
O O t^ s*
00 00 f^ «^
vo co m
oo r-. o oo
ON ON ON co
m vo co
ON m 1-4 vo
O rH VO 00
rH rH rH
CM rH in r-l
rH
4>
p
U
C X
Tt C ^
td c 3 4)
fri 3 « b
K U
4) Vl
rH 4) 0) 4)
JJ CO > -O
u 4) cd cd
•H 4» Jff J2
(J CO 3 CO
r^rHr^oo^moo-*
. rH
r^
•*CMCO<)'rHOvOvOO
VO rH ^J- ,H
CM
om«*corHvooo«*vo
•^ §H st CM m m CM
rH «oocMvooNoo
OO "^ *sf VD rH ON
M M
r^ CM
rH
CMrHONOOcMCM<±ONO
invorHr^oocorHinco
ininCOrHCM r^!
4) C C O 3 *4) r^
td o! « 3 M c 4i
X 00 C « 0 3 H
CO rH (4 C O & S3
4) 4) -H E 03 01
JdMrHVlOrHrHCCO
Vl3rH(drHi-4rHa)C
ctf c0 *f*4 Q O ^ Q) »^ QJ
QJSioocoP^SoM
oo
CO
rH
CM
m
0
n
ON
VD
ON
rH
rH
O
o
vo
CO
CM
m
CO
8
CO
rH
CO
t^
4)
4)
U
CO
C
4)
(Q
iy>
i-i
0
rf
jj
3
O
CO
295
-------
/••^
*o
CO
3
C
•i-t
4J
C
O
vli
m
en
CO
r-l
XI
cd
H
'"""S
1 cd
C -0
3 r-l
i-l *— '
CO X-N
CO >
eo cd
C -a
cd ^
60 X)
c d
c
O x->
r-i cd
T3
cd X)
4J r-l
O N-'
H
E
cd
CO <~N
rl CO >
4J 4J Cd
CO Cd *rj
00 i— ' X)
C 3 t— i
.H CO v-/
co
o
CO <•>
Jj CO >
co cd
"X, i— 1 <0 "rj
XI cd C *-*
•U T) XI
CO O rl r-l
00 H cd ^
•5 r* *
?J
i-H ^ Q) ^"1 >•
. £5 4J Cd
CO P -H T3
60 5 r-l -rj v^
cd P, nj -H xi
C ^ 4J 0 r-l
•H M O CM
vo i— i ON co omr-if^-in
Sin vo ON CM »d" o <— i
m CM oo t^ CM j ON oo F"* en en r-»
>d* vo r^» in CM O t— i I-H ^
ONCMCMCM CMO Icnl^
n n
* en
vo r-i en CM
ON ON vO m I*»
00 ON co > cu cd
O crj 3 O r-i CO
O CU Of rl Cfl r-l
« « <>^ CD CJ O
vO
en
00
CM
CM
vO
ON
r-l
vO
r-
oo
r-i
rH
ON
CO
oo
r-l
!-<
r-l
CM
ft
r-l
oo
o
I-l
en
ON
r-i
vo
«^-
M
VO
^j (
ON
ON
i— i
CO
I-l
cd
4J
O
H
-------
Mine No. 5191 contributed an effluent of 84 gpm which carried
an acid load of 51^ Ib/day. This effluent drains from the old Ber-
wind White Mine at Scalp Level. This mine is now operated by the
Jandy Coal Company. The Commonwealth does not consider Jandy re-
sponsible for the discharge and treatment is not required. Dis-
charge No.'s 5296 and 5297 were collected at an active drift mine
on Dark Shade Creek. This mine is also operating in old mine
workings and is not considered responsible for the discharge.
One additional source of active drainage resulted from the
preparation plant operated by Jandy Coal Company at Scalp Level.
During the course of the field operations in the Scalp Level area,
it was often observed that Little Baint Creek carried an excessive
amount of coal fines. In at least one instance, these coal fines
were traced to a discharge emanating from the coal washery (No.
53^7). This effluent also carried an acid load of 8k Ib/day.
A total of 199 discharging sources and approximately 5,700
acres of surface mined land were investigated during this study.
Table 35 presents an area breakdown in terms of total flow and
total loadings (Ib/day) of polluting constituents discharged to
receiving streams in the Stony Creek watershed. Table 36 presents
a summary of flow volumes and chemical loadings by source type for
the 199 discharging sources.
297
-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DAT\tiff\20017E53.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DAT\tiff\20017E53.T$F.T$F" failed.
-------
FiGJRL 22
STONEY CKEE K
MINE LOCATION ^M
-------
co
f
cd
H
cu
a.
cu
o
^
o
CO
GO
cfl
O
cu
00
cd
C!
O
u
C
o
CO
6 x-v
3 >
C cti
•H 13
•^3 v-x
Q) x-v
05 >•
CU cfl
C *"CJ
cfl \
60X>
C rH
C
O <-»
M cd
•O
cd x>
i | j
o ^-*
H
x™>
cu >
4-1 Cfl
Cfl T)
i-l X>
3 rH
CO ^
CO x~
CO >•
i— 1 m cfl
cd G T3
[ 1 »TJ *^
O r4 X>
H Cfl rH
4J
CU >sx~
& U >
•H cd
rH T3 TJ
Cfl V4 "^
4J O X>
0
00
i-H In
cd cfl x-^
4-> X! g
O O D
H CO 61
•H ^^
Q
CO
<4-l 0)
O 0
(^
• 3
O O
J3 GO
0)
a
H
cu
o
Jj
3
o
w
1— 1
CO
°1
1-1
r^
rH
in
t^
00
•.
o
m
*\
r^
VO
O
O
O
n
0
1— 1
o
cxi
rH
CO x-s
el
4J C
<4-i cd
•H XI
LI cd
Q xx'
r^. cxt rH ON in i— i oo
co ON o m i-i
r-l rH CXI CO
1 — 1 in rH CXI in ON 1 — IrH
VO O CO t"» in rH
rH rH
lA ^ OO t^* *^" O rH in
CO ON CXI CXI ON in ft ft ft
OO CO rH CO CO rH
rH
vO r^ *^~ 00 VO cxi vO*3"
vo
vO rH 1-4 O CXI^vO O ITl
mmoolH Q.C D.-H iHC 4Jfi COC CU Cd'H
<4H4J -H cfl -H 4J XI Cfl <4Hcfl 3cfl C O-i4J
•HO r4X> 1-1 O BX> tfl XI MH X> C CUO
Lj cQ 4J cd 4J cd O cfl X< cfl CU cd 3 (-i cd
Q >-» c/5 •^^ CO >— ' U N-' to *~* K >— ' H pn v— '
vO
CO
OO
CXI
cxi
vO
ON
rH
vO
Is-
00
rH
r^x
°1
oo
oo
rH
rH
rH
cxi
•\
r— 1
oo
o
CO
«\
px»
ON
rH
vO
•11^
ft
vO
rH
ON
ON
rH
CO
rH
td
4J
O
H
301
-------
POLLUTION ABATEMEHT
As shown in Table 36, drift mines were the principal sources
of mine drainage pollution in the Stony Creek watershed. The
total acid load discharged from these sources was more than
67,000 Ib/day. Abandoned shaft mines and refuse piles also con-
tributed significant acid loads.
Including all source types, a total of 13 principal sources
of mine drainage discharge were located in the study area. These
sources included ten drift mines, two shaft mines, and one coal
refuse pile. These sources discharged a total acid load of
6l,76l Ib/day, about 63 percent of the acid load discharged by
all 199 sources located during this survey.
A program of mine drainage pollution abatement in the Stony
Creek watershed should give primary consideration to these thirteen
sources. Although numerous and significant sources of mine drain-
age exist in the watershed, abatement of these sources without
previous or concurrent abatement of the 13 principal sources, would
not result in; a major improvement in the stream water quality of
Stony Creek.
However, even when effective drainage control can be estab-
lished at the thirteen principal source sites, a residual acid
load of more than 35,000 Ib/day would still discharge to receiving
streams in the Stony Creek watershed. This acid load would emanate
from the large number of unabated sites remaining in the watershed.
It would be expected that this residual acid loading would be of
such magnitude that the stream water quality of Stony Creek would
302
-------
remain degraded to some degree by mine discharges. For this
reason, any remedial program designed to significantly improve
the water quality in all portions of the watershed, would have
to consider more than the 13 principal source, sites listed in
this document.
There is insufficient stream water quality data available to
accurately predict the effects upon stream water quality as a re-
sult of source abatement. Detailed engineering studies and long
term water quality sampling at the source sites and at selected
stream locations throughout the watershed may shift abatement
priority from the listing in Table 37. Economic or technical con-
straints may also be responsible for a similar change. However, the
initial emphasis can be placed upon the principal source sites until
such a time that further study can recommend the addition or dele-
tions of other sources.
The following is a description of the 13 principal sources
recommended for abatement. These sources are listed in Table 37
and the mine site locations are shown in Figure 23. In the Stony
Creek watershed, all mine drainage sources which discharged an acid
load exceeding 1,000 Ib/day are considered as principal sources„
Mine No. 5378 was an active drift mine which contributed an acid
load of U,63^ Ib/day. Since treatment facilities have been in-
stalled at this mine, it is not considered as a principal source.
303
-------
§
HI
4J
CO
60
C
•H
•H
CD
O
0^
>-,
cd
T3
rN-0
4-1 i-l
1-1
T)
•rl
O i-l
< ^
1?
CO
0)
CJ
Jj ^J
o 1 cu
TJ CO CJ CJ
CU -H C
r; cu 4-< rt
^3 60 -H 4-1
M cd O O
Is* 4J -H (X 'O
CO cj cfl CO C
5 MO
0) 73 CJ
XI 0) (U
CD CU C
o e
C rt
O £X
4J 1-1
CO O
C
•r*f
PM x-s
Jj £3
O pi
i-l 60
Pn •»-'
CD
C
4-1
O
cu
a.
*
o
25
0)
C
•H
53
»
cu
cu
tJ
C cu
D 13
O! rt
,15
i-< CO
0)
rt rt
I f^
0
CM 00
oo
M
CM
s~^
CU >s
iw cu cd
•H c i*
P4 g .2
'cu cd
'3 4-» •«
IH oj
^
•-i m
r-4 r-l
CM CM
m m
^
cu
cu
f^
cu
cd
M
^J
rt
a
m
,—j
m
^j-
0
CO
o
o
CM
<-<
CO
m
f>«*
00
0)
C
£
4-1
•H
CO
CM
m
"a
*»
C
0
4J
CO
oo
CT\
CO
CM
m
vO
vO
, r-l
O
0
00
CM
00
CM
O
CM
r-l
%
g
4-1
1
00
ro
CO
m
•8
0)
(4
CJ
4J
C
•d
CU
VO
m
m
CO
o
CO
o
o
m
r-l
CT\
CO
vO
in
ON
§
g
<4-l
•H
o
CO
co
' m
%
vO
m
CM
»*
r-l
%
g
4-1
•H
r-l
i-H
<^
m
is \t
•> CO
C r^
O r-l
4J CU
CO &
oo m
CO i-H
00 CM
vO i— 1
CM
O 0
m »>S ^S
C C C
o o o
4-1 4J 4J
co co co
•vf C^ fv.
r*** ^^
CM i-H r-J
CO vO vO
CO CM CO
r-l O O
vt CM r>.
r-l
-------
FiGJRt 23
STONEY CHEEK
PRINCIPAL SOURCE LOCATION MAP
-------
PRINCIPAL SOURCES
Site No.
The 20 gpm effluent sampled at this site represents a dis-
charge from a swampy area Just north of Central City. At this
point, a considerable amount of coal refuse material is scattered
about the general area. This refuse has, in places, resulted in
the formation of several small impoundments within the swampy area.
Leaching of this refuse has resulted in the production of highly
mineralized water which seeps to Dark Shade Creek. Sample No. 5211
represents a cumulative discharge of this drainage. The acid load
from this single source was 2,880 Ib/day. There were numerous im-
measurable seepage areas in this vicinity which contributes unknown
amounts of acid to the receiving streams.
Mine No.
The 2,889 gpm effluent from this source was the largest mine
drainage discharge in the Shade Creek watershed. The exact origin
of the drainage is unknown. It may result from a shaft or borehole
or may drain one of the numerous large drift mines which have been
operative at one time in the Central City area. The discharge is
located in a somewhat swampy area between the railroad tracks and
Dark Shade Creek at a point just below the confluence of Little Dark
Shade Creek and Shade Creek. The concrete structure from which the
drainage emerges somewhat resembles a "pill box" approximately eight
feet in width and two feet in height. Whatever the origin, the
307
-------
structure has quite obviously been constructed for the explicit
purpose of draining a nearby mine. The acid load discharged to
Dark Shade Creek was 6,93^ Ib/day.
Mine Ho. 5293
The drainage from this mine reportedly results from the
abandoned Franklin No. M- Mine in Central City. The preparation
plant associated with this mine is still in operation. Surface
mined coal from the surrounding area is trucked to the plant for
preparation prior to being loaded in rail cars. The drainage flows
from a culvert near the preparation plant and discharges to Dark
Shade Creek directly behind the Central City Fire Station. The
acid load was ^,515 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5327
This mine is located approximately 0.3 mile northeast of the
old Berwind White No. 37 Mine. It is assumed that Mine No. 5327
is associated with the Berwind operation. The discharge was 180
gpm which carried an acid load of 1,771 Ib/day to an unnamed trib-
utary of Paint Creek. The main portals at Mine No. 37 were dry.
Mine No. 5333
This mine is located on main stem Stony Creek about midway be-
tween the Johnstown suburbs of Moxham and Hornerstown. There are
two mine openings at this site at a level just above the Johnstown
and Stony Creek railroad tracks which parallel this section of Stony
Creek. One of these openings is dry while the second discharged
308
-------
an effluent of H80 gpm directly to Stony Creek. The acid load from
Mine Ho. 5333 was 3,312 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5338
The discharge at this mine site results from a shaft which was
reportedly constructed to drain mine workings from a nearby mine.
This 120 gpm discharge is located on the opposite bank of Stony
Creek directly across from the small community of Krings. The mine
or mines drained by this opening are probably drift mines developed
in the coal seams outcropping along Stony Creek. The acid load dis-
charged to main stem Stony Creek was 2,398 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5*H1
Mine No. 5^11 is one of nine drift mines located along the
South Fork of Bens Creek just above the community of Thomas Mill.
Eight of these mines contribute drainage to the South Fork. Mine
No. 5^11 is by far the largest of these effluents. This mine is
almost totally responsible for the grossly discolored appearance
exhibited by the South Fork along its entire remaining downstream
length. The acid load carried by this 1,256 gpm effluent was
2,231 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5*H5
The largest acid load in the entire k66 square mile drainage
area of Stony Creek resulted from Mine No. 5^15. This mine, as
well as two additional openings, are located on the west bank
hillside almost directly across from Point Bark in downtown Johns-
town. All three openings have been sealed; however, about 75
309
-------
below one of the seals, a 630 gpm effluent discharged to Stony
Creek. At the time of sampling, the acid load was 26,838 Ib/day.
Mine No. 5^27
This mine is located near the headwaters of Wells Creek, a
tributary to Stony Creek. There are tro openings to the mine
and both were discharging at the time of inspection. The com-
bined effluent was 225 gpm which carried an acid load of 1,215 Ib/day.
The area immediately above the old openings has been surface mined.
Mine No.
This 3Ul gpm effluent drains from the old Wilber Mine on the
east bank of Stony Creek south of Hoovers vi lie. At the time of
inspection, this drainage was piped under Route 53 to the prepara-
tion facility of the Solar Fuel Company. An unknown portion of
this drainage was lime treated by the Solar Fuel Company for use
in their facility. The acid load carried by the entire untreated
discharge as it emerges from the hillside was l,2Mt- Ib/day. A
second effluent of 8 gpm also discharges from the Wilber Mine. A
salvage operator at the mine reported that the entire discharge from
the mine was at one time piped under Route 53 « However, due to a
roof fall within the mine, a portion of the drainage is diverted
and is not piped under the road bed. The acid load from this sec-
ond source (No. 5^65) was 69 Ib/day.
Although not operating, the portals and air fan to this mine
were still in tact and a considerable amount of mine equipment
310
-------
was on the site. Apparently, the mine had been vorked to some ex-
tent until recently.
Mine Ho. 5902
Mine No. 5502 is located along the east bank of Stony Creek
just below the mouth of Shade Creek. A series of three drift mines
are located along the hillside. Two of these were dry while the
third (No. 5502) contributed a discharge of k20 gpm which carried
an acid load of 3,830 Ib/day.
Mine No.
This underground mine is located at the tip of a one mile
contour surface mine. The surface mine apparently removed the
coal outcropping along the hillside but did not cut into the
older underground entry. However, the surface mine has probably
created points of intersection with the underground mine voids.
The discharge measured at the mine opening was 270 gpm which car-
ried an acid load of 1,037 Ib/day.
311
-------
REFERENCES
1. Vanzandt, H. M., 1933 Impounding Mine Water to Reduce Acuity
in the Bituminous Coal Mines of Western Pennsylvania, a report
to the Coal Mining Institute of America, Dec. 6-7, 1933.
2. Section 206, Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965,
authorized a comprehensive water resources study of the
Appalachian Region.
3. Schneider and others, 1965, Water Resources of the Appalachian
Region Pennsylvania to Alabama, U. S. Geological Survey HA-198.
k. Shapiro, M. A., Andelman, J. B., and Morgan, P. V., 1966,
Intensive Study of the Water at Critical Points on the Mononga-
hela, Allegheny, and Ohio Rivers in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Area, University of Pittsburgh, 126 p.
5. The Clean Streams Law, PL 19^7, Pennsylvania Legislative Act
39*4-, June 22, 1937, as amended.
6. Abatement of Pollution from Abandoned Mines in Pennsylvania, A
Progress Report, Sanitary Water Board, Publication No. 26,
March 1, 1970.
7. Pennsylvania Department of Mines and Mineral Industries -
Bituminous Division, Annual Report 1968, 219 p.
8. Dowd, J. J., and others, 1951> Estimate of Known_Recoverable
Reserves of Coking Coal in Armstrong Coun1% Pa. ,~U. S. Department
of the Interior Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations U80l,
16 p.
9. Dowd, J. J., and others, 1950, Estimate of Known Recoverable
Reserves of Coking Coal in Cambria County, Pa., U. S. Department
of the Interior Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations ^73*4-, 25 p.
10. Dowd, J. J., and others, 1950, Estimate of Known Recoverable
Reserves of Coking Coal in Indiana County, Pa.t U. S. Department
of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations V757,
22 p.
11. Wallace, J. J., and others, 1953, Estimate of Known Recoverable
Reserves of Coking Coal in Somerset County, Pa., U. S. Department
of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations ^998,
20 p.
12. Dowd, J. J., and others, 1951> Estimate of Known Recoverable
Reserves of Coking Coal in Westloreland county, Ba., U. IT.
Department or the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of In-
vestigations U803, 16 p.
-------
REFERENCES (Continued)
13. Shaffner, M. N., 1958, Geology and Mineral Resources of the
New Florence Quadrangle, Pennsylvania^ Pennsylvania Geological
Survey, A57, 155 p.
313
-------
APPENDICES
315
-------
^J
X
S
[25
w
PM
CM
vO
VO
i— i
CO
60
C
•H
C
•H
M-H
^
CO
>
3
CO
1
^»
4J
•H
rt
cr
j_J
CO
4J
rt
S
B
rt
cu
rH
C
•_^
CO
rt
r-l
0)
>
C*
CO
rt
4J
co
C
•H
B
•H
CO
•H
W
CO
JJ en
O *W
T-I 0
CO
CO
0) *->
C T-I
cd ^-v
hft bl
l~
cd c ^~
.U O 61
o ,H B
H M >^
m
4J *•>
cd T-I
M-4 *^v
rH 61
3 B
CO
CO /•>
CO T-I
•9 61
^3
JJ
C »->
•H T-I
cd 61
T-I N-'
*S
•H 61
°N§
PS
O
CO
M-i a)
O rH
a
• s
o B
'Z, CO
B
o
•H
4J
rt
u
C
0
•H
cd •
JJ O
co 2;
i— i
r-H r-
CO C
t^ cfl
rt X!
O CO
^
o
ON
<)•
m o
rH rO
oo
0 CM
0 0
o o
O rH
0 0
<»• in
C<1
0 0
r-- O
VO
0 0
m m
TH
o o
CO O
1-H
CM OO
* •
VO 1^
r**»
C X
(0
rt rt
X!
j CM r>-
ON O ON
m CM
O O ON
CO CO CM
rH CO CM
o o o
o m ON
CM
in <)•
• •
vo r*-
r-.
C X 60
-$-3
% §
o B
09 (-1
C rt
(U 0)
m e
m
ON
^-
0 0
CM CM
rH
CO CM
• *
VO PN.
f-s,
n ^
Jkuj
co
r-l ON
o m
CM
O CO
rH 4J
rH 3
Q) O
ON
ON
»J
CM
vO
CM
rH
O
CO
O
*
VO
^^
oo
vO
O
rH
0
CO
rH
co
r>.
CM
^
f^.
60
jf
CO
CO
o
in o r^
o o CM
rH <(• CM
o oo co
o o o
rH CM -3-
CO CM VO
I— I
O O CO
vO • CM
vO CM
CM CM
CO rH
tj
****
o m
O CM
o m
i*» m
O CO
i (&)
r-4 4J
vV Q) M-|
> ODTt
A-l
-------
0)
c
u
c
o
CJ
H
/•"N
Oil
*+•
i-l CJ
CO
09
0) ^
C r-l
cd * —
60 6
Cv!
«("* ^^
I-l ^*v
U O 6
one
H H ^
cd i-i
3J
CO >-•
09
09 /->
0) i-l
c **•-*.
£~
•H
C /•>
•rl i-l
SI
^^
4J ^^
"o ^
*
09
in a)
0 r-l
o
• e
O cd
13 CO
g
•H
4J
cd
o
3
o
Q
u
cd •
4J O
co S3
O O CO
in ON m
CM r-l
ON vo co
i-l CM CM
>
CO CM
o o m
O CM O
O O 00
IO r-l CM
vo rx i-i
• •
co m
vO
C X 60
(^
m «
60 V
0) C
T"H
O CO 4-1
cd 0) 3
« CJ I
ON
vD
m
O O CO
O vO vO
VD ON CO
CM i-l
r-l CM 00
st oo m
*
m
m ON CM
vo t-» in
r-l C^) CM
O CM r-l
O O CD
O vO CO
O r-4 O
^J
%_
o o m
CD tft vo
m
VMS
O O CM
CM m eo
-
O O CM
CM ON CM
r-l CO tM
O o r-»
m i-i oo
r-i
r-. i-i
VD O
1-1
VO
C X 60
• O
M CO
CJ CD
0) >
Cd 4J O
C 3 43
C Q «d fc
of pj «
43 • 0) i-l
r-l CO 60 C
cd • TJ O
>sp T-l 60
Q p -H
h3 vB» « rJ
CM
(«s.
m
O O CM
co o m
m co CM
CO r-4
CM m o
co m «*
o •* oo
00 00 CO
.
00 00 r-l
oo CM m
CM r-l
co in oo
«* CM r»
r-4
^?
v— '
O O CO
o m vo
«tt i»» m
•it -it »*
o o m
1
2 2
•H
43 cd
60 r-l
3 m
CO O r-l
C r-l r-l
O CO -H
CJ 43 >
in
m
o o oo
vo m 05
m o r»-
r-l
m m vo
co vo -*
O O CM
r-l CM m
ON r-l r-l
CO CM
O O 00
o o m
m o »*
•ct in oo
I-l CM r-l
O O CM
r^ O r-i
•* r-4 r-l
CM -vf CO
O O O
O O O
O O 00
Jj
0 43
*~~* *2
o p
cd cd
r-l CO
« C
VO
in
o m sj
r-i r» in
CM sd" CO
ON O CM
CM r^ in
CM -* r-l
CO *Ct f^s
vo r~s in
r-l CO CM
m
s^
O O 0
0 O O
m o CM
«H in hs.
r-l CM r-4
in
S^x
O O 0
O CM CM
r-l CO CM
O O O
O O O
o o in
i-l CM O
r-4 l*v r-l
|^^ i^ C3
r-l r-1
|ss ON
CM CM
vO
C X 60
A! CM
CO CM
C 4J
cd ^ 3
MOO
m i-i p2
r-4 •
43 ^ CO
4J O •
l-i cd p
O r-i
z pa (Si
pv.
f>^
m
A-2
-------
5 co
Ot.i__t
M-f
r-l 0
fr. S^
CU
CO
S'S
C° 6
3W
/^->
2 O ^
O Jj 6
H H v^
CU
4J /"N
CT) r-l
r-l 61
3 £3
co ^
DO
CO
"US
5-
•H
c /-•>
•rl r-l
n) U
•rl r-l
"0*8
<^
PS
O
CO
'•M O
O i-l
* €
O rt
C
O
•rl
4J
cfl
0
3
C
0
•H
4J
rt •
4J 0
CO !3
O O r-l
00 CM 00
•d" CM
vO ON CD
CM m -d-
x— \
•**s
^
(q g)
O M
•rl
t 1 Jj
O
O r-l
^
oo
m
o o co
ON CM fo
CM r-l l-v
CM m co
s~^
in
O r- oo
CM r-l ON
CM * CM
vO CM
x-N
m
s^
O O O
O O O
O -^ 00
oo co ON
r-l
o o m
O CM r-l
CM O 1-^
O O O
o m 0>
Ctf 4J >
X Q -H -H
u tJ ei
C M
cd 0 0 43
14 g 4J 60
Bfl r-4 3
•rl • 0)
Vj U J-i C
O O 4J O
0
oo
m
O ON
1 • •
0 0
oo 3 CO
•rl 'H r-l
tJ M M-l l3
r-l
00
m
i-l _> ON
O CM CO
I—I
O CO r-l
O CM r-l
o m CM
o o o
/•x
m
^^
o o
vo r-i -d1
CM T-4
o o oo
uji o m
ON O vt
CM r-l
O O CO
CM 00 O
CO CM
o o o
o co r^
•tf r-l
1-1 ON
• •
m vo
VO
C X 60
•H Ctf ft
CJ
CO
rl
Cfr^
•H U
C 3
o o
f-^ C
frj
6 r-l
CO n)
3 0)
cy c
CO
00
m
m o oo
«* O CO
i-l CO CM
CM I"- m
o o o
o m CM
o o o
m
^^
O O 00
m m co
m co o\
I-l CM r-l
000
r^ r^» CD
00 CO rH
rH CM CM
O 0 r^
CM 00 ON
r-l CM r-l
o o m
m vo i— i
vo o
• •
vo r*^
vO
B X 60
O
*2
CO >s
to O
CJ 4J
CO
C rl
O cfl
•U CU
CO C
m
00
in
(U
09
3
00
CU
rl
0)
m
0)
AJ
erj
U
•rl
•g
A-3
-------
APPENDIX B
KISKtMINETAS RIVER, MAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
CODES FOR TABULAR DATA - PAGES B-l THROUGH B-5
TYPE
C - Combination Mine
D - Drift Mine
S - Strip Mine
R - Refuse Pile
0 - Oil Well
A - Active Operations
RECEIVING STREAM
1 - Wo1ford Run
2. Unnamed tribs to Wolford Run
3. Kiskiminetas River
4. Unnamed tribs to Kiskiminetas River
5. Beaver Run
6. Unnamed tribs to Beaver Run
7. Unnamed tribs to Porters Run
8. Thorn Run
9. Unnamed tribs to Thorn Run
10. Unnamed tribs to Long Run
11. Pine Run
12. Rattling Run
13. Sulphur Run
14. Sugar Hollow
15. Roaring Run
16. Guffy Run
17. Blacklegs Creek
18. Unnamed tribs to Blacklegs Creek
19. Big Run
20. Unnamed tribs to Big Run
21. Whiskey Run
22. Unnamed tribs to Whiskey Run
B
-------
B-l
m r-t o
cn m NO en
ON rH
en o
3 In
o CM in
fx rH CM
00 00 rH
sO
CO
in rH
O CM
O t-- r* m O
O O rH rH •*
oo o
> so
rH
O
sO
O O
ON »*
O O
rH >*
O
o
m
o
s
CNj
O
00
3
o
35
2.
m CM o
so so m
r-* r-. so
rH rH CM
O
S
§o
en
L C
'8
1 §
i in
4 cn
3 ON
O
O
**
CM
m
§ 8
m o
cn -*
cn cn
o
o
s
so
8
m
cn
-------
B-2
1
i-
t-t rH
<^
fl)
4) ^
01 rQ
« rH
C
JfrH
§cd
•3
IH "x,
M &
rH
rt
4J
o-f
^3
n
0) -O
4J *X,
rt Xi
VH rH
3
"i
n
W "O
0) "^
S3
•§
li^
q
51 -5
•H -^
Tj r-l
e
E
g
£
I
u B
•ri n
•H I
m\
PS
O,
r?
•H S
> I
•H (
a h
U 1J
d) CO
pS
«
U O
3 !
41
1*
r*
O
rH
00
CM
rH
O
in
o
00
in
O
rH
S
*f
.n
rH
CM
00
lA
CM
CO
CM
lA
sD
CO
sO
CU
sO
m
«o
lA
0>
O
rH
rH
fO
o
CO
rH
O
in
so
CO
rx
rH
O
3
so
CM
O
m
ON
O
CM
^
o
§
CO
sD
CO
Q
iA
O
S
00
rH
rH
CO
CO
o
ON
rH
CO
o
rx
rH
CO
lA
CO
O
rH
O
CO
ro
8
so
rH
CM
|
CO
CM
ON
cn
VO
lA
sO
CM
VO
CO
CO
CM
r.
ON
rH
CM
O
0
CM
O
CM
CM
O
CO
lA
CM
rx
8
in
rH
O
iA
rH
«M
rH
O
o
o
CO
ON
cn
^
o
m
00
CM
.A
rH
CM
00
_
CM
CM
CO
CM
rH
m
rH
O
§
CM
O
CO
o>
o
1
§
in
o
IA
CM
rH
0
lA
CM
CO
CO
rH
rH
o
00
m
^
rH
_
r-«
-0
o
^
rH
rH
rH
ON
CM
O
CM
m
CO
§
o
CM
-a-
00
o
CM
O
S
rH
rH
O
0
O
^
CM
rH
m
o
rH
O
rH
CM
n
5
§
O
ON
ON
O
CO
CM
CO
sO
CM
8
iA
^
8
lA
CM
CO
o
r-t
O
CO
S
_
o
*
rH
rH
0
o
CO
CO
O
tn
00
rH
rH
in
CM
ON
m
m
m
o
rH
-a-
rH
8
CM
CM
O
rH
Q
-tf
S
O
rH
ON
sO
CM
rH
O
so
CO
o
lA
ON
CO
CO
o
CO
ON
t
f
1
I
1
1
'
CO
CM
O
in
CO
8
sO
CM
CO
sH;
o
m
s
CO
lA
O
CO
rH
CO
lA
rH
CO
rH
ON
rH
5
CM
CO
m
lA
8
lA
lA
CM
CM
fH
ON
CM
in
CO
so
CO
1
CO
CO
CM
fH
U
r-
CO
lA
SO
O
so
§
CM
O
CM
rH
rH
O
S
fH
o
o
rx
o
sO
CO
in
rH
rH
rt
|
CO
CO
CO
rH
0
00
S
cn
CO
o
VO
-t
^
rH
lA
r-
rH
O
CO
0*
CO
o
CM
lA
iA
rH
lA
so
CO
r-.
CO
rH
o
S
rH
lA
rH
O
o
CM
CO
CO
rH
Q
ON
S
*H
^
CO
ON
CM
CM
O
in
rH
o
r-l
CO
t»-
00
rH
lA
ON
CM
ON
CO
o
rx
CM
CO
m
m
o\
o
rH
CM
§
CO
o
CO
CO
tH
Q
0
»
r*.
»n
ON
00
m
r-
rH
r^
rH
sO
CO
sO
CO
rH
8
SO
CO
sO
r-.
ro
lA
fH
0
rH
lA
rH
00
O
8
CO
fO
rH
Q
rH
S
vO
vO
OV
lA
^
O
o
CO
CO
CM
SO
rH
CO
rH
O
SO
CM
CO
CO
sO
CM
sO
O
rH
rH
CM
8
O
CO
CM
CO
CO
Q
CM
00
^
S
O
lA
sO
CO
_
,_,
rH
ON
sO
§
O
sO
00
o\
sO
sO
in
1
CM
00
CM
h-
8
in
o
00
o
00
00
(M
CO
Q
CO
00
1C
CO
CM
CM
O
3
Ov
rH
CO
rH
O
in
O
o
00
in
CO
o
vO
vO
8
lA
CM
m
rH
CO
CM
so
IA
IA
8
fO
CM
CM
O
§
o"
rH
rH
CM
CO
C4
^
S
VO
O
o
CM
O
O
O
CM
O
rH
O
rH
8
CO
lA
rH
0
rH
8
CM
O
S
rH
CM
CO
CO
Q
lA
00
00
ON
CO
0
3
"""
rH
rH
lA
§
CO
lA
CM
CM
3
sO
ON
O
8
OO
IX.
o
sO
VO
00
I-I
o
o
CO
CTV
^
§
CO
CM
-------
B-3
83
a
s
i
o
i
A
CO
2
j*
s
i
S
CO
2
a
i*
§ ^
C r-4
1
3
4g rH
"i
>
Q) -fl
09 --x
S.O
rH
00
(J rH
""
>
& -v.
M .O
rH
rH
2
0 rH
H ^
1
H
*
n f.
3
1
>!
n
DB -v.
T3 ""*
If
>,
>.-3
4J *"s.
•H J3
-O rH
•H
a
£
g
<,
CM
O
§
m
O
rH
ON
m
O
rH
CM
m
rH
ON
CO
in
3
CM
O
CO
r*.
8
cn
rH
m
_
3
O
00
vO
O
in
ON
CO
vO
r**
CO
vO
CM
O
CM
cn
cn
CM
rH
CM
O
m
ON
CM
O
vD
cn
m
i-*
m
r-
^
o
3
CM
r*.
VO
8
o
i-i
o
00
r^
o
0
r-
o
o
o
o
CO
o
CM
CM
NO
NO
T-4
CM
CO
rH
r-t
00
CM
in
0
H
.-H
Ox
00
cn
rH
00
ON
cn
cn
rH
r*.
CM
S
rH
r-.
g
<*
rH
$
cn
cn
°
O
NO
cn
cn
8
o
r-t
0
00
"*
r-l
O
NO
"*
r^
O
00
in
00
in
CM
NO
*
8
cn
in
o
m
.
§
CM
ON
rH
vO
VO
O
CM
cn
m
cn
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
C-J
O
O
vO
cn
CM
CM
m
o
m
r-*
rH
S
•it
CM
CO
CO
»
r.
NO
CO
^
CM
cn
o
*
vO
vO
rH
rH
00
rH
m
3
vO
CM
O
O
m
o
o
o
o
-d-
o
o
CO
o
CM
o
o
o
o
r-l
o
o
r-
o
o
0
m
o
o
o
m
in
CM
O
o
CM
o
m
o
O
0
^
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
CM
o
o
a
CM
o
o
r-l
CO
0
NO
rH
1
o
CM
•*
m
CO
CM
rH
,_(
CO
NO
o
o
CM
O
00
0
s
cn
cn
m
rH
CM
rH
CD
o
o
rH
r-
r-4
O
-------
B-4
CO
u
&
1
£
o
z
§
H
CO
•j!
|
a
a
i
CO
£
»••
•a
5s
§
^
S
S^o
O rH
C
rt
00
J •"*
*
s 1
o ~
H .C
rH
(0
O rH
H"§
0,1
4J ""v
td ,0
4H rH
i-l
3
CO rH
"i
m t
^
^,
n
X t
•H ^
3C
§
£
a>
c
u c
•H C
u :
8-1
CO (
CJ
32
W>
C
•H !
0) •
U •
0)
CO
3-
r*.
o-«
O
r^
CM
O
stf
CM
t-H
r-.
O
CM
rH
CO
CM
O
8
rH
O
\o
CO
o
CM
CO
CO
CM
8
CM
O
CO
CM
CJ
CO
CM
O
0
r-t
tM
rH
O
CO
CO
o
o
o
0
CO
in
r-
vO
r-
1-4
rH
VO
i— i
O
o
CM
CM
vO
CM
CO
CM
u-i
*~*
*
$
^
O
rH
CO
f-
r_,
CM
s
m
CO
s
CO
rH
o
CJ*
CM
CM
O
CM
CO
O
8
m
CO
CM
m
3
m
CO
g
m
o
vO
8
in
CO
CO
CM
Q
rH
CO
ON
*"*
O
r-l
r-t
CO
o
CO
CO
CO
CO
o
CM
CO
CO
CM
8
0
in
CO
r-
t-H
o
i-t
8
O
rH
CO
CM
O
CM
CO
r-
o
CM
CM
CO
0
rH
CO
CM
CO
O
O>
rH
rH
CO
8
CO
i-H
CO
rH
m
CM
CM
8
m
CO
CM
CO
CO
CO
r-l
0
g
CM
-------
B-5
s
a
I
S
S
S
I
s?
•H E
> «
5
CO
O O O O r-» O CM
O O O O «-i O v£>
O O in ^.t1 O fO ro
fj O O •* co f-J (^
o o o o
o o o o
O r-l
o !>•
o o o o
O o
^ 3
o o o o
us oo co o o o n
CM \& CO VO OO •"•* O>
^. es f** CM
o o o o
O 00
t—t
t£>
s
o o o o oo o o
O O O O Q
O O CM O O O
O f1"* *•* 00 *fl "
** n P*I ro
-------
APPENDIX C
LOYALHANNA CREEK
CODES FOR TABULAR DATA - PAGES 0-1 THROUGH C-2
TYPE
C - Combination Mines
D - Drift Mine
S - Strip Mine
R - Refuse Piles
Sh - Shaft or Slope Mine
CO - Coal Outcrdp
RECEIVING STREAM
1. Loyalhanna Creek
2. Unnamed tribs to Loyalhanna Cr,
3. Getty Run
4. Unnamed tribs to Getty Run
5. Crabtree Creek
6. Little Crabtree Creek
7. Keystone Run
8. Union Run
9. Saxman Run
10. Ninendle Run
11. Miller Run
12. Fourmile Run
13. Clark Hollow
14. Unnamed tribs to Mill Creek
15. Hannas Run
16. Unnamed tribs to Hannas Run
17. Whitethorn Creek
-------
i
T
§5
L
"* 8
a
mgane«e
2-.
1
g 1
O T
r_,
(U
O -4
H~8~
3
(O «-4
a
«
01 T
C r-l
l~
8
a
>ST
•0 -
1
8
Bu
I
u c
•H •
U4 4.
CO (
u
•&
H !
« b
U 4
U 4
CO
So
s*
01 CO
CO 00
g s
r-l O
0 0
m r*>
CO CM
IA rH
-4
O O>
OS *
IA
r*» r-l
80
ICO
CM IA
ro
§00
en
r*. o
h- r-i
O O
S 3
CO
(SI Csl
1 1
tA 00
CM ro
r-4 r-l
u a
IA o
CM »A
r. « ,n -
O 00 1- -»
O4 !"• m OS
lA rH
co vO r- A
00 CM -I
~ - o tn
r-l r- I
cn to o ao
^ «•* en CM
Q O fi ^
tA 00
O O O O O
CM O ro PO >*
CO iA O
r- * r-4
CO lA CM CM 00
80 Q O lA
O Mf -1 CM
r-l r-4 r-l
r-4 CO r- •*
CM r-l
•* •» CM CM •>*
O •* r*. IA CM
" S 5 S S
3 lA r-l
lA IA in lA IA
r-l (-4
sO *» CM
8Q Q Q Q
o o o o
-«r m SA r^
fH r-4 r-l rH rH
in in in in in
CO «
r-l SO
r-4
— O
•» 171
CO O
(M rH
"-1
OS
*
O
GO
O
00
0
o
CM
lA
O
I-*
r-4
tA
i-4
O
CM
cn
IA
CM
o
CO
§
IN
m
CO
a
m
^
o
IA
0
CO
SO
SO
rH
rH
CO
o
sO
0
s
CM
r-4
O
CO
r-l
3
S
CO
r-4
R
S
04
1*1
^
CM
O
m
m
CO
-•
SO
r*
0
O
fs4
CM
IA
O
CO
rH
(M
0
CM
CO
rH
-
R
lA
CO
0
5
CM
8
S
^
04
U
IA
CO
"
>0
3
0
O
*-4
^
SO
O
lA
tA
rH
g
CM
~
CM
00
r4
CO
CM
r-4
IA
S
r-4
0
(-4
8
00
*+
00
CM
to
•A
r-4
m
o
CM
O
s
IA
r-4
&
*
CM
lA
lA
CM
O
CM
r-l
O
S
r-4
**
1
Csl
m
CO
CM
a
so
rH
*A
fM
O
<*>
CO
rH
O
o
I
CM
O
8
O
I-*
IT.
rM
*
CM
R
o"
£
O
CO
ro
CM
tA
lA
C*
CM
CM
S
NO
^
sO
-*
CM
CM
0
sO
O
5
ro
O
F- 1
00
o
ro
1
.n
*
o
sO
•o
CM
tA
-------
c-z
- • s
»OBinOO'*N'*»>l-*
C>m — N>-ie>-iNmgo
in o N
28"
K in
N O
» — -* f*j eg *vj
i-l 00
IH
O O r- O O O OOO-< «« IA •« IA m N «
<*i *s F- in
- N S S
~« tn ro ^ O
-^ O O Ps( *
(••j in n o »*»
(4
5-
n « in
m r» wt o
8 " f 2
fM
r*
in
r^ o r^ in
-» O o m
N — » oo
N o
n ga
•» H
S 8
« (M N O O
ej O (M
"* S *
1 I §
m o O O
SO O O
r* r** —«
vOtniANfii4CMiNegr>i*«if-'r*.
|3
!J
-------
APPENDIX D
CCHEMAUGH RIVER, WAIN STEM AND MINOR TRIBUTARIES
Codes for Tabular Data -
Pages D-l Throuefr D-2
TYPE
C. Combination Mine
D. Drift Mines
S. Strip Mines
R. Refuse Piles
Sh. Shaft Mine
A. Active
RECEIVING STREAM
1. Conemaugh River
2. Unnamed trlbs to Conemaugh River
3. Aultmana Run
k. Unnamed tribs to Altmans Run
5. Reeds Run
6. Unnamed trlbs to Reeds Run.
7. Weal Run
8. Coal Run
9. McGee Run
10, . Freeman Run
11. Tubmill Creek
12. Unnamed tribs to Hypocrite Creek
13. St. Clair Run
Ik. East Branch Richards Run
15. West Branch Richards Run
16. Hinckston Run
-------
D-l
a;
g
Q
ffi
g
>•
•3
a "^
9 A
c •-<
•H
rH
< rH
>
(1
T
ai -^
a £
c
&0
S ~*>
g
>
c i
85
:-
L
H"«
J3
o -a
u ^~
a jz
MH rH
rH
S
W rH
^,
g
.1
01^
S5
•0
IH
a rH
as ^-
>
n
rS-S
w >^
•n JD
T) rH
o
I
« t
u w
co w
IX
0)
0 4
« •
53
d
o
m
o
v£>
rH
00
rH
r.
rH
O
CM
CM
r*
O
CO
CO
o
R
rH
O
rH
1
£
r-t
1
CM
I--
rH
m
vO
rH
Q
i
m
o
o
CM
o
o
o
r-
o
f>
o
r*.
^
rH
m
rH
CO
m
m
rH
1
FH
CO
1
o
8
rH
Q
ft
CO
m
-d-
m
"°
SO
o
rH
in
r-.
,3.
O
CM
CO
0
§
*
CM
m
00
rH
m
rH
00
CO
vO
§
R
rH
O
ON
CO
rH
O
ON
CM
O
0
CM
CO
m
rH
-------
D-2
<*
W
>
s
1
^*
2
O
CJ
•>.
rt
1 i
C rH
a
r-H rH
21
B
C n]
M X>
rH
n)
O r-4
M
ulfate
1 lb/d£
en -^
i
«
CO -O
CO \
111 XI
C rH
T)
ffl rH
X ~~.
Ct
U X
•H
"'s
g
C
a
o c
•H 0
O ~
8.1
CO 0
o
*s
I
> G
•H C
<0 <
U (-1
£ t
(X en
o
o i
CO H
B
2 z
CM
r~
r.
iA
Ov
CO
O
r-
,
at
3
in
rH
m
vO
O
CM
rH
CO
ON
rH
CO
m
(0
ON
vO
vO
vO
O
m
en
CM
rH
CO
CM
O
m
CO
0
s
o
CO
s
o
o
IA
00
CO
IA
"*
o
8
vO
CM
CO
in
01
3
in
m
CM
8
vO
CO
[^
1
^
8
o
CM
O
CO
3
§
CM
m
-------
Codes for Tabular Data
APPENDIX E
BLACKLICK CREEK
Pages E-l Through E-6
Type
C - Combination Mines
D - Drift Mines
S - Strip Mines
Sh- -Shaft Mines
R - Refuse Piles
A - Active
Receiving Stream
1 - Blacklick Creek
2 - Unnamed tribs to Blacklick Creek
3 - Unnamed tribs to Muddy Run
4 - Weir's Run
5 - Laurel Run
6 - Unnamed tribs to Laurel Run
7 - Ramsey Run
8 - Unnamed tribs to Ramsey Run
9 - Mardis Run
10 - Aulds Run
11 - Unnamed tribs to Aulds Run
12 - Unnamed tribs to Rummel Run
13 - South Branch Blacklick Creek
14 - Unnamed tribs to South Branch
Blacklick Creek
15 - Brush Creek
16 - Coal Pit Run
17 - Crooked Run
18 - Dutch Run
19 - Unnamed tribs to Hill Creek
20 - Elk Creek
E
-------
E-l
£
CJ
g
J
a
CO
X
^
3 -O
•H
JL
M)
e
X
T)
QJ ^
m X)
C
cd
00
C
ff
^
C T3
o -^
M <-*
m
u >~-<
H 00
E
X
TJ
ea >-<
3 i-i
00
E
X
rt
T!
w ^-,
eu .-i
C
•o
*^
n)
•H -C)
•O i-.
*^
00
E
8
Oi
u u
•H C
m nj
•H 0
r*»
rH
m
00
^
CM
it
i-i
o
in
"*
en
§
CM
Ctf
3
**
lA
O
lA
CO
O
rH
iA
ro
00
^J-
**
o
lA
rH
sO
CM
00
rH
O
o
'""
en
CM
O
iA
r-4
in
CM
o
CM
o
8
f-
CM
CO
*
3
^t
00
o
o
Ov
ON
eN
CO
en
lA
CM
^
vO
1— t
o
lA
~*
CM
ON
CM
O
O
rH
00
x.
1
a^
eN
0
m
•£>
8
o
v£>
O
m
*
CO
.
CO
§
lA
ON
O
ro
O
a>
o
sO
lA
lA
CO
1
CO
rH
ft
m
Vf
-*
tn
vO
CN
m
o
o
t£
ON
•*
-3-
,-(
2
rH
^J
rH
^
CM
evi
4
^|
ON
rH
ON
^J
iA
ro
NO
r-
CM
rH
NO
O
lA
00
-0
00
o
CM
CO
**
O
CO
lA
$
1
ro
CM
a
3
-------
E-2
g
o
a
M
d
u
03
>,
5
C £
L
* >
X
>
c *o
O -x.
•H r-«
nj
«S>
n)
•O
rt <-l
U-t
a •-<
op
e
>,
<->CN'000'-<*0
0
f— ti— t^ocnsorxfM
O o rH o - O O OO Cn cM
rH fM CM CM 00 CM in
rx-J-cOiAONONCMrH
en
O n so in cn in CM in
CM CM P*J rH cn 00 rH
§O O O O O Q O
in in ON o o o in
fi-t
-------
E-3
«
gj
u
M
5
CQ
§
5
c
1
to
c
00
c
JC
(4
(H
c«
4J
H
4J
n)
CO
CO
c
TJ
PC
X
£
u
(J
•r-t
•H
u
g.
CO
•H
•H
(U
1
U
0
CO
r
c
2
fs
5
43
i_4
^
x
•o
,O
i-t
M)
x
TJ
rH
,-i
ff
m
JD
bp
6
ca
"O
\
fiP
B
cd
•o
^
rH
M
B
g
rH
(-1
ON
vO
ft
P^
CM
en
CO
00
2
8
§
0^
in
rH
CM
O
O
m
S
r-5
ON
en
CO
cn
3
CT*
lA
^
CM
m
0
i-t
CM
O
CM
en
CO
CM
ON
o
CM
rH
r-t
rH
O
o
O
CM
0
O
vO
r-t
O
*
CJ
^
3
en
O
m
o
O
CM
O
00
O
vO
en
cr
O
3
vO
en
ON
rH
CO
rH
O
CM
en
cn
O
in
3
o
o
o
o
0
rH
o
CM
o
en
^
CM
O
CO
m
0
CM
CM
O
CM
en
vO
*
CO
0
*
3
-i
0
-*
o
o
<"•>
_,
•*
^
rH
r^
,-J
VO
iH
•*
U-l
0
CO
m
CM
vO
CM
rH
CM
m
CM
g
m
m
„
CO
CM
1
-d-
CNJ
O
»-t
»d;
rH
0
rH
,»
r-t
O
t-4
m
rH
ON
CM
1-4
en
CM
-d-
S
0
m
in
CO
cn
CO
3
00
CM
^
,_,
ON
rH
^
O
^
o
ON
O
1-4
00
ON
m
'•O
m
m
o
o
en
m
*
CO
^
I
CO
o
o
o
CM
0
en
rH
^
m
en
O
en
i- <
CM
r-4
rH
5
o
CM
o
00
CO
m
CO
m
i
in
O
rH
O
r-l
O
,_,
o
CO
O
ON
O
"
CO
"T
CM
1
CM
O
O
CM
m
r--
O
NO
1
•1
o
o
0
1— 1
o
o
o
0
~
o
1-4
m
n
(SI
e*l
O
O
f-i
m
r^
O
^
3
ON
O
m
o
CM
CM
rH
O
•A
O
m
CM
CM
"*
ON
i- 1
en
o
CM
o
m
"
o
00
I
ON
r-l
0
cn
m
rH
i- 1
en
O
CM
en
O
m
CM
m
o-
§
ON
ON
1
cn
R
§
8
00
O
*
Q
ON
3
m
rH
rH
m
CM
o
rH
ON
^
en
00
PX,
^
o,
CVf
CO
o
oo
CO
fv
en
ON
o
O
CM
CM
o\
CO
i-H
ON
en
s
ON
m
m
o
CM
m
o
o
5
m
CM
a
o
3
rH
CO
m
ON
m
__,
cn
m
CM
ON
3
O
m
CM
m
rH
o
oo
8
CO
CM
O
CM
S
ON
-d-
0
p-
CM
8
CM
CM
o
CO
,_,
3
CO
CM
O
r-t
rH
n
o
CM
en
r-.
5
o
ON
ON
O
m
o
CM
p*.
rH
m
0
CO
CM
CM
CM
8
§
CM
CM
CO
CM
3
>~
§
m
CO
VO
m
en
o
ON
ITl
o
CM
en
O
8
CM
rs.
0
o
§
o
oo
CM
vO
O
Csj
O
0
CM
m
0
o
CO
ON
cn
CM
rH
CO
m
3
ON
r-.
f-H
m
CM
cn
ON
m
O
rH
00
CM
a
o
m
CM
o
CM
0
m
cn
ON
S
§
en
m
O
o
CO
r-
"*
g
tn
CM
CM
rH
ft
-------
E-4
CO CM «O
^ O
vO CO
o vo r- ON ro CM
r*» rH
in o
O O CM
CO CM •-<
fM O t~*
O
o
•-H i-H CO CO
o o o -I
CO CO CO CM
CO lA 00
iA 00 00
O 00 CO
O f* O
ON CM
rH O
CMvOOrHlAO"HCMCM "-tO^OOOO
•-*iAOO«sJOOOr-ieMOOO'<*1OO
O i-4 ON O
O
O
I-H CO rH CO
rHCO<-HCMONcMOlA
OCMOOOr-HQOrH
r-t lA CM CO CM
ON CO CM O O
i-H CM vO O «-H O CO
o o o o o o o
f< rH 0>pQp
****«*»*3'^i-*'
-------
E-5
V.
S
o
8
rH
8
m
X
4
e S
1
tH rH
*>
^
si
v *
ST
s r-
>
^
g£
p .0
« r"
o ^-
H OP
B
rt
•O
U fl
rt i-1
r-t
S i-i
w ff
4
S .0
(4
g1
&l
|s
M
B
|
U U
T4 U
S.I
U C
3
• §
IB
* M
u
If
I;
vO
sO
»
vO
CO
0
-
CM
O
n
0
fH
CO
1
vO
tH
CM
8
CO
vO
3
S
o
CM
O\
IA
CO
CO
V0
tx tH rx *>4 (sj (r> ,H
O CO O ^ *O CO O
(A
m
O fx o* fO CM oo »n
f* CM CM fx in 00 O
O rx o O O O O
sf •* tH \O 00 s» CM
fO CM CO fx CO xt rH
"J1 CM ON o »n co »H
»n (O in xf
3O xt tH O lA fx
CO CM xt CO CM rH
OJ O vO 00 CM *A CM
O o o o o o m
^ 3 IH IH 2 rH °*
lA CM iA «^ lA ^ CM
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
O Q Q Q O Q O
PS oo CK o f^ CM cn
rH g rH g CM CM CM
in in uS in wS in in
CM
O
|H
°
O
CM
0
r-l
O
cn
o
cn
in
rH
m
CM
S
in
m
1-4
S
1-4
O
cn
0
i
o
o
o
o
o
1-4
o
o
o
rt
0
rH
in
1-4
^
m
so
rH
CM
CM
m
S
^
"*
O
§
CM
S
CM
SO
a
rH
CM
tO
S
CO
rH
.£
0
5
I
cn
S
o
""*
i
in
in
1
g
rH
m
CM
0
sO
CM
S
Ht
in
CM
CM
r^
0
o
m
^
-
^
r.
3
I
*
rH
fx
S
o
g
8
SO
rH
in rs.
rH rH
tO SP rH in sf
CM St 00
o o m o m
* " S r( s?
•* VO CM CM O
tH tH
|H rH r-t fO |X
Sf IA A
fM
rH
O'
%c
vO
O
*
™
CM
tH
CM
S
tH
CM
2
o
rH
00
.,
cn
vt
r-t
r-
o
oo
in
r>
O
so
CH
O
o
rst
O
CM
<"H
O
00
rH
00
3
fx
CM
CM
CM
0
0
CM
IA
CO
CO
CM
3
fM
rH
O
CH
-------
E-6
tf
c
8
*-J
g
ro
X
I-
S ^3
5 "
ft rH
ff
X
V •&
01 -^
S £
no
Ic
*I ^--
ff
^
C *3
flj
0 ^
H M
X
n)
0) — <
M-4
3 r-.
rt
U U
"** S
•H 4J
U U
0) 9
B.'O
(/) C
=§.
• 3
u C
a C
oK m
h
&&
8 o.
FM O O vo -*
rHOO^OQ
rM
rvj »n ^ *o O
(M O
fM
-« O O CM rH
T O O rH fM
.— a, •-< o *n
O ~J -* in rH
CM
' -» !> O rH O»
O O O •vO CO
O rH CO O
0 -• rH tf\ CO
ro
CM O O CM CM
rH
O vO o O Q
*
CM
CM
in O O rH CM
f*" CO W
00 00 vO O O
f"1- CO 00 CO O
CM
OO O O CO (O
rH VD ON
rH 0
CM
co in ON in O
CM O rH QO O
r-4
CM
O "• O O CO
QO CM
8 § | 8 8
CM
m vo oo in ov
V) V) V) 06 06
m uN m »n in
rH
m
Q
m
CO
m
o
rH
O
^
fM
rH
a»
ON
rj
O
in
CM
CO
rH
co
8
o
rH
rH
in
in
8
in
•""
PI
8
CM
in
at
R
8
CM
n
^
•3
O
m
o
00
rH
m
CM
8
O
r*.
CO
S
^
*!*
3
S
8
CM
rt
ft
00
8
ON
ON
r»
2
^
^
Ov
^
VO
r-l
CM
CO
O
rH
m
3
rH
8
CM
f^
CM
CM
3
s
§
rH
CO
a
ON
R
o
S
r.
fx
r^
O
ro
vO
fM
CO
l-l
rH
S
rH
OO
CM
8
CM
CO
O
CM
,_,
CO
m
CO
oo
rH
in
m
vo
S?
CM
00
fl
CM
§
rH
1-4
10
$
<
rH
00
in
o
S
CO
m
rH
CM
O
in
in
rH
»n
vD
vO
r-4
O
CM
1
CO
•*
o
VO
fx
S
r-4
m
O
CM
1
CM
m
CO
o
•<
CM
rH
O
•9
rH
C
in
vO
00
o
o
s
VO
•n
rH
g
rH
in
§
-H
§
rH
OO
CM
r*
O
•4
§
CM
CM
VO
O
O
.H
0
in
0
O
-
f^
in
vo
g
r-t
vO
•-I
CM
ps.
**
tM
3
§
O
»H
<
m
§
ro
0
,_,
ON
ro
CM
£
m
o
CM
CM
in
0
rH
a
®.
CM
rH
m
00
in
m
in
CM
m
CM
rH
0
rH
r-.
o
m
CO
GO
VO
•<
rH
m
rH
rH
rH
o
ro
0
m
o
CO
rH
S
in
o\
CO
o
rH
1
00
•v
o
CO
o
s
00
vO
VO
O
<
1
CO
00
CM
sr
^
CM
CM
0
CM
rH
CO
SO
CM
8
o
vO
00
p
VO
O
r^
i
a
rH
0
m
o
CM
00
<
o
f-f
8
fO
ro
in
CO
r*
r-
rH
CM
CM
CO
CM
B
cM
rH
SO
O
vO
in
CM
O
CM
cO
CO
rH
in
m
m
0
~
§
04
O
CM
vt
<
oo
r-*
in
vO
CM
*n
rH
rH
o
r-
O
rsl
ro
CM
CM
in
2
CO
8
ON
*"*
0
CM
CO
CM
ON
CO
CO
«-*
o
CO
cr-
CD
p;
i
?
8
CM
rH
|
CM
00
<
3
rH
in
CO
s
in
"*
•-o
§
,H
vO
CO
rH
CM
^
^
CO
r-4
vO
CO
O
NO
vO
CM
S
o
vO
m
m
00
r-4
m
O
*
r-4
CM
tn
CO
0
(M
P-»
CO
§
rH
g
CM
§
vO
•<
m
rH
*t
*
00
GO
iTl
•S.
CM
CM
f*
cr
m
rj
m
CM
CM
•in
rH
8
CM
VO
in
00
O
rH
rH
O
VO
00
m
CM
§
r.
CO
o
CM
at
|
-------
APPENDIX F
Two Lick Creek
Codes For Tabular Data
Pages F-l Through F-7
Type
C - Combination Mines
D - Drift Mines
S - Strip Mines
Sh- Shaft Mines
R - Refuse Piles
0 - Gas Wells.'
CO- Coal Outcrop
A - Active
Receiving Stream
1 - Two Lick Creek
2 - Unnamed tribs to Two Lick Creek
3 - Yellow Creek
4 - Unnamed tribs to Yellow Creek
5 - North Branch Two Lick Creek
6 - Unnamed tribs to North Branch
Two Lick Creek
7 - Unnamed tribs to Little Yellow
Creek
8 - Buck Run
9 - Unnamed tribs to Buck Run
10 - Ferrier Run
11 - Unnamed tribs to Ferrier Run
12 - Dixon Run
13 - Unnamed tribs to Dixon Run
14 - Leonard Run
15 - Unnamed tribs to Leonard Run
16 - Penn Run
17 - Unnamed tribs to Penn Run
18 - Ramsey Run
19 - Allen Run
20 - Tearing Run
21 - Unnamed tribs to Tearing Run
-------
F-l
M
1
g
3
r
>•
•3
§ ^
•H
B
3
< r-l
"i
>
C rH
m
bO
C
%z
01
0
*x
c -3
25
M r-l
nj
4J
O H
*S
B
>
nj
•3
0) -^
AJ -O
5 "
3 f-"
CO --
g
>
rt
to tJ
S 5
C r-l
•o
b
BJ -v.
g
>
rt
X-d
*J *v.
•H JQ
TJ rH
•H
O
< r^
"a
s
0
fa
0)
o
o c
*iH (fl
O ^
m
•H 0)
m «.
»n CM r». m o
Q txj -* 0 O
ON o m co •*
O O r-. CM O
r-l (M CM
m CM en o en
o o o o o
00 OO CM: rH 00
O O "A i~l r-l
r-l
in CM en CM CM
o 0
in
en
m
^j.
CM
00
00
O
CO
m
•-1
O
^
CM
o
en
8
in
vO
CM
O
§
o
-d-
* O
en -4 en m en
cn en ON in -d
ew r^ O O m
r-t o o m o
en rH -j- ON \o
m O r-l rH ITl
rH
t^ CM in rH t—t
CTi CS O rH O
O ^ CM CM m -d in m
1—4
O O O O O
eg ,-H rn _j
o m CM m ON
O
CM
-d-
00
00
o
cn
m
en
O
rH
r-«
00
£>
CM
0
"
O
M
O
m
0
cn
en
O
CM
CO
r-*
O
CM
cn
CM
o
-a
m
<^j
m
P,
oo
0>
"*
00
U1
tvi
n
0
O
-*
^
oo
^
0
0
2
_
o
*?
in
0
o
"
rg
O
r^
00
O
O
r-l
CXJ
O
0
vO
,_(
0
o
u>
0
tvl
in
^-i
rg
r-^
"
o
\o
o
o
o-
en
OiQCJOOUMOOOOQO
MMUQOSQC/IOOWQ
OrHCMcn-di
inminminiANOiOND\o\ONOvD\OvOvOP^^r-'r^r^
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
in NO r*- oo
CM CM CM CM
-------
7-2
>
rt
TJ
§i
c ~"
jj
«: -i
*
>
v -d
is
«j
60
1
>
C rt
h lv-
rH 41
n)
-U
O rH
f-H --
8
*>•
J3
ft) *0
u ""*-•
cd J3
m i-H
P
W rH
*s
>
m T3
W --.
OJ ,£1
C rH
T)
i->
ffl rH
as ---
&
E
>
3 £
*iH
^
g
h
0)
o
o c
tM 4.
•H y
o s
& c
w c
*
?
* 1
rH (M
O O
*""*
*
r-l
0 en
0 -H
r-, r*-
rH m
O 0
O m
ro oo
O m
r-H
CO O">
m
CM
O 0
CM r-.
en m
r->
CO ^
-H- 00
CM
xT
CM
rH
O
fM
^
rH
O**
*^
fM
O
CO
o
00
rH
CO
O
m
CM
CO
fM
0
r-.
r-t
^
•*t
-*
i-l
CM
00
CM
in
00
v£)
•^1
i-H
s
•d-
CM
O
CM
s
lA
O
CO
I
CM
O\
CM
I-H
O
o
CM
0
O
o
rH
O
0
CO
O
in
lA
rH
\o
CM
vO
rH
O
O\
CO
§
CO
*°
O
O
vO
0
0
o
-*
o
r-l
O
CO
"*
r^
g
I-H
CM
in
vD
rH
^
o>
CO
CM
o
o
f-»
0
0
o
r-t
o
o
o
CM
O
m
m
eg
-*
S
CM
rH
OO
t
8
in
*
O
0
Os
0
0
o
o
CM
o
o
^
i-H
o
o
rH
CN
vO
O
m
P-I
rH
O
!-*
CO
m
o
f**
0
0
0
rH
O
rH
O
CO
o
o>
r»-
o
CM
-*
cr\
o\
•X)
CM
rH
rH
0
CO
1
O
CO
R
rH
r^
CM
O*>
°
CM
O
rH
0
m
o
CM
O
VO
lA
in
CM
vO
CO
m
CM
o
CM
vt
CO
1
0
IX
1
o
CM
CM
O
00
rH
O
O
CM
0
lA
•tf
lA
CO
|-»
CO
vO
0
CO
vO
-*
m
o
|
^
•*
-< - 0
O CO rH CT\ O
CM r-4 lA CM
r*. CM CM CM >
-------
F-3
>
R
s^
§i
O -1
1
"i
>
a
0^
m A
1^
§
c S
2?
M X)
rH
rH
ttf
JJ
£^
%
B
>•
fl)
V *0
4J V.
« X>
UH r-l
"a
CO f-4
•*-.
s
>
Cl
to t
e "^
T)
Sd
i
>
Cl
•H ^
•^
bJ
6
g
b
0
o
0 C
•H rf
»*H AJ
•H o
0 3
1J
=g
oo
•§ s
> «
-H 0>
0) M
o u
3"
0)
O 0)
r4 P
8£
VI
S 0
s z
CM O
O O
0 r-*
i-t r-l
CM O
O O
O CM
00 O
r-i 0
P- O
r- O
,_,
o m
CO CO
CN)
CO O
CM
rH CM
CM O
1
o CM
rH rH
0 O
CM
O O
O\ vO
en r-4
in rH
vo rs
m m
rH rH
O CO
vO !*••«
CM eM
-* -3-
CM
0
o
"*
r-t
O
OS
O
O
en
0
CM
o
m
•si-
rH
CM
CO
CM
en
3
IA
in
c*g
r^
CM
•ct
-*
I-J
at
00
ON
ON
eM
rH
<*
«tf
rH
O
rH
O
CO
en
rH
Px
rM
CO
CM
CM
O
3
r-»
m
CM
O
m
m
CM
n
CO
O
s
*
m
rH
0
en
f»*
0
m
o
p^
in
s
00
o
rH
CM
CM
in
m
SO
CO
r-t CO
-
oo
cn
iA
Q
CM
o
r-
9
5
CM
en
CM
S
CM
0
rH
-Ct
cn
m
Q
m
-------
F-4
1
§2
C rH
«<
b|
B
>•
"9
V *v
CQ .0
n)
C
00
C
§
g 1
2|
2
fiC
H ^
y
e
i*
n)
cu *O
S«
3 _.
M c!
W
i
f*
rt
(0 T3
0) ^v
0) JD
C rH
T_)
t4
Cfl rH
K *--
(Si
e
p
rt
Ps-O
4J **~-
•H £>
TJ r*
T-l
I
8
fn
.
o^
o
O\
rH
^
O
0>
o
00
rH
O
en
cn
ON
CM
r*
rH
in
s
S
en
m
CD
00
00
<•*
vO
0
m
cn
rH
rH
O
CM
rH
„
O
00
£>
ON
*d-
m
ON
00
o
vO
O
rH
ON
O
^
vo
O
CO
cn
m
CM
CM
00
r*.
cn
o
CM
cn
00
cn
i
CM
CO
8
m
m
m
Q
r*-
ON
-*
m
o
CM
0
00
00
rH
vO
~
ON
*""
^
rH
rS
vO
0
"
o
00
ON
CM
ON
0
CO
m
o
0
rH
m
CM
vO
P
OO
CJN
-J-
o
^H
(Tx
vO
*~*
O
CN
O
in
0
^
m
r-
S
CM
vjD
-------
F-5
r-> fO O
O O O
lA tO CM ft ON *T
CO «-< CO O O O
CO CO CM i-l O P'1' i-t O M CM I-H
1X00000 d Q o •-* o
CO (O o ON
in IA m in
CM o ON co co o
2 S
*^- rH t—« "d" OOCM ^H^HvO^^O
0) .0
0) rH
O'-H'-'ONONCOOO
O ro O -H
CM O CM
^O ON O ,
O CM -* T
O U"> lA 00
r-t O OO CM O -tf
(O O vO O O
o o ooo
O lA
q
co t
NO o CM r-. co O oo
OCOOOiAOONON
•-HOOOCO r-iOtOiAiAOO
lA O CM
rH CM CO
-O O O
o
B
CO CM CM
CO CO -sf -O sD
CM co
lA O "A lA in
to !*•• oo f-i r^-
CM ON O 00
lA IA O
lA
-------
F-6
«A «O •""
O O 03
c«* ON cn O
co co co
ro CM CM r*.
O .O>r--COCMO
OO'-'CMCMOOOOO
CO O CO
o o o
roOOiAf^.ro{>jt-4incor>\oror--iACMOO'O.0cO'3"O"'ir^.ocsJ co
^"COiA COCO'O^DONOOCMfMt—I^OP^ CM CM CO >—I CM
rg CM O CM o ""»
CM CM CM CM CM
S S
O O O O
iA CO —
CO & O
O r-1 O CM
O O O
vn »n o >n »n
in fM co CM
O co o
o o o
IA o o
iA CM O
O CO 'A CM
fOtACMCMCMCMlACMlACMrslcM
^
CMCMCMCMfMCMCMCM
CM fM CM
Q U O CO
cocoviQcoodcococo
Q Q O Q pj
O r-i CM
COONO^-*O^i--iCMCO»d'iAvDP^.COO*iO'~
-------
F-7
^
u
o
g
g
>
•3
1 la
C rH
•H
rH
8
cfl
01 ^v.
Vi -Q
0) rH
C
ffl
00
C
*?
si
IU -V.
M ,O
rH
2
O t-H
rH *v>
I
td
01 TJ
.u -"v.
td .Q
MH rH
rH
3
CO rH
a
5
n)
w TJ
M *-*
C «— *
K "a
B
>
rS-3
iJ "^
•H -D
•O rH
•H
"i
&.
OJ
u
U C
£ 3
•H 0
U 3
ai rH
(X 1=
CO O
u
•s
> eg
U (H
U 4J
5"
2 §
to
0) •
2 z
00 -d"
O CM
r^ in
^ CM
r- co
rH O
r>* oo
u-i co
O m
i-H rH
rH
r- ON
vo m
op
ft
CM
CM
Q
$
5
00
CM
OO
r«
>o
CM
00
•a
^
co
r*
"
CO
CM
m
CM
CM
m
O
en
a-
o
vO
o
en
rH
CM
CM
a
s
5
00
rH
*.
§
o
-1
»»
CO
^
o
co
o
co
in
CM
8
en
8
in
CM
m
O
m
CM
8
CM
0
8
§
en
CM
Q
CM
Q
0
5
in
£
o
rH
CM
00
00
CM
-d-
rH
CM
8
m
m
en
0
00
CM
CM
en
O
CM
S
rH
O
co
o
00
m
o
o
r^
CM
Q
rH
5
rH
0
00
rH
O
CM
rH
O
o
•»
o
vO
0
rv
rH
«
t-H
rH
CM
en
O
en
^
X)
"•
Q
in
5
n
o
00
I-H
o
CM
O
^
O
•a
O
S
m
*£>
t-H
en
CO
en
CM
rH
1
CM
T
iQ
0
00
NO
^
Q
s
^
rH
0
m
•-1
O
rH
O ,
o
0
m
o
rH
S
t-H
CM
CM
vO
CM
CM
CM
rH
1
CM
1
00
8
r*
^
rH
r*.
5
CM
in
CO
en
en
o
o
t-H
m
^
vO
t-4
rH
m
CM
en
m
CO
8
rH
^
O
s
o
00
00
R
o
rH
fv
0
CSJ
O
CM
1
00
CO
ti
rH
^f
(0
in
o
3
rH
*
o
0
in
CM
CO
•*
rH
0
9
en
r*
t-H
m
r-
3
CO
i-H
in
s
i-H
t-H
m
r*.
^J
en
m
en
CM
etf
rH
in
vO
f>
O
£
CM
CM
O
r*
t-H
O
o
^J
00
CO
o
in
CO
CM
rH
O
o
0
•3-
m
CM
CO
fo
rH
O
g
en
en
en
a;
CM
0
O
o>
CM
en
CM
CM
rH
CM
en
o
o
o
oo
o
en
en
o
CO
en
f-H
rH
CO
en
en
rH
CM
O
R
CM
^
en
06
§
m
en
CM
VO
m
O
CM
CM
-*
m
CM
rH
CM
m
CM
CO
en
§
m
rH
S
in
rH
00
CO
CO
o
rH
o
CM
8
m
CM
oo
CM
*
g
in
0
O
ON
>-
o
o
00
o
o
0
o\
vO
o
°
00
0
o
CO
in
o
o
m
o
1
m
CM
&
in
g
in
GO
in
O
tn
O
rH
rH
m
o
m
S.T
CM
0
00
rH
en
O
in
rH
rH
rH
m
o
«•
rH
CMi
o
CO
CM
rH
CM
IT,
§
en
CO
CM
m
en
CM
£
m
en
rH
m
CM
rH
rH
r~(
1
CM
CO
CM
9
£
in
O
0
o
0
•-f
CM
0
CM
-t
(M
0
CM
O
rH
-n
CM
3
Q
S
I
g
'
8
o
o
r~t
tM
a*
-0
g
en
in
r-4
m
-------
APPENDIX 6
LITTLE OORJMAUGH RIVER
Codes for Tabular Data -
Pages G-l Through G-
C - Combination Mines
D - Drift Mines
8 - Strip Mines
Sh- Shaft Mines
R - Refuse Piles
0 - Oil Well
00- Coal Outcrop
A - Active
Receiving Stream
1 - Little Conemaugh River
2 - Unnamed tribs. to Little
Conemaugh River
3 - North Branch
k - South Fork
5 - Unnamed tribs to South Fork
$ - Bear Rock Run
7 - Unnamed tribs. to Bear Rock Run
8 - Christie Hollow
9 - Bens Creek
10 - Unnamed tribs. to Bens Creek
11 - Trout Run
12 - Unnamed tribs. to Trout Run
13 - Spring Run
Ik - Unnamed tribs. to Spring Run
15 - Sulphur Creek
16 - Unnamed tribs to Sulphur Creek
17 - Saltlick Run
18 - Bear Run
19 - Clapboard Run
-------
G-l
* °
oo o
C <-4
ft
3 i-i
10 (M O
81
n
00
C
5-
CM
CM
0*
m
oodcso^ino^
O^coor^^rM^r
0
-------
G-2
>-
TJ
C ~>
3
< w*
of
g
j.
V *&
(0 "Ss
V Xt
C r-l
ffi
c
u
i
'- ri
O 1-1
M
rt
o; T3
*J *s^
M-l r-l
CO r-l
1
>
ft
W T)
Wl 's
11 ,T)
cd rH
B
CT
4J *-^
*H X
13 i-r
y ^
0
e
1
E*
a
o c
•H C.
u :
11
U
Eg
00
c
•rt 6
> CT
*rl Q
,_,
r-«
O
CM
rH
0
CM
0
IA
O
CM
O
O
in
CM
CO
PO
CO
CO
iA
NO
CO
•st
ON
**
CM
^
st
NO
O
^f
o
m
CM
•st
m
00
m
CO
o
o
CO
NO
o
o
CM
^
CO
CO
§
irt
^
0
00
vO
^
O
n
c*
o
fn
,_!
O
r*j
-»
r-l
^.
ao
CM
1-1
CT\
rf
O
.n
-*
w
r-t
iA
rH
I-H
m
O
rs
CM,
r-
n
m
CO
t-H
o
in
O
O
O
CO
CM
m
0
ON
CM
tA
O
rH
i~4
ro
Q
NO
0
iA
rH
ro
C7>
CM
O
-*
fJN
O
O
o
CM
iA
1
O
CO
CM
lA
CO
CM
lA
CX>
0
8
•st
NO
Q
0
iA
NO
0
0
NO
tA
0
ro
in
st
CO
O
iA
ON
^
CM
a
§
\r>
NO
rn
CM
r-
CO
st
ON
ro
r-t
ro
CO
o
r-.
CM
CO
tA
0
Nf>
CO
rs.
^
O
CO
CO
CO
IA
CM
r-t
in
O
O
NO
CM
r-
CM
a
ON
O
lA
NO
rH
VO
rsj
rH
0
rH
O
0
o
CM
0
iA
O
O
CO
O
o
o
r*.
i
^
i
O
iA
ON
NO
Q
O
xA
(A
O
rH
CM
CM
0
ON
0
o
0
CM
o
CM
CO
st
CM
ON
O
rs-
CM
CO
CO
m
CM
CO
en
•*
rt
rn"
«n
00
o
ON
ON
ON
tA
in
,_,
ro
CO
CO
CO
o
o
CO
^
LA
tA
iA
CM
•f>
NO
CM
o
m
CM
CN
CO
CO
o
o
m
^
CO
Q
CM
m
-------
G-3
s
>
a
i
§
a
M
,J
>
il
c — »
«c
8
>
83
-S
(t
U
O r-t
H~i
>
ffl
T3
0) -^
v Ji
W — *
UH
r— 4
3 -,
f/J *•
61
E
>
to
« TJ
0» V.
2:2
•5
5^
>
xx!
4J J3
V* rH
TJ
51
8
l>4
«
U g
v4 t
W-t *.
•H 0
U 3
U TJ
a c
«,§
=5
R
?«
a> S
U u
«sw
«
II
JP
1*
0
rg
0
O
0
0
Csl
0
so
-»
r>.
§
vO
ON
r-.
r*
rH
in
CM
o
xO
O
00
g
vD
O
S
ft
o
ft
CM
f*
CM
O
CM
^O
ft
O
*£>
O
CO
m
r»
o
-*
-*
00^
"~l
in
o
r^
g
5
8
CM
fl
•tf
&
•&
m
CM
r-l
0*
ft
00
CM
CM
fi
-i
r+
S
g
vO
\0
«n
a
r*
u^
O
•»
pg
m o «-* ^ m »-**>. o
f>
ON ^ O fl fO
r-l *M r-l in
a * <* a a M
8r-l
s
*
M
r-4
m
00
r-*
ON
CM
-»
CM
00
ON
r*
v
CM
in
oo
vO
o
-*
fl
CM
OD
ft
IN.
m
CM
o
00
fv
r-
0
8
?
m
*
0
r*.
m
en
r*-
r^
CM
-
r>.
ON
r-l
I
CM
f*
0
3
m
in
00
CM
m
en
r^
r*
rH
r^.
r-4
8
r>4
"^
o
r^
\D
O
CM
NO
S
<»
o
r>
-»
$
|
rH
r-
CM
*f
O
m
CO
m
rH
O
m
fM
0
r*.
CM
O
CM
en
o»
m
*£>
fi
r*.
CM
r*.
CM
CM
vO
sO
CM
S
*o
o
-J
•^
W
SO
r>
m
Csl
O
vO
00
r-l
in
r*
in
oo
r-
m
ON
V*
S
-
f»
*n
^H
r-t
CM
cr
f»
•^>
»
0
oO
r-i
<*
•£>
CO
s*
fi
""
ro
fi
in
O
r-«
r-«
fl
in
O
i-4
00
r-
-------
G-4
of
5
3
I
i
8
3
H
5
^,
-3
iS
C
L
< C!
>
•3
«* "v,
n .0
8"
I"1
3
k
c-3
85
M .-*
^J
4J t-t
-1
Sulface
;/l lb/da>
»
.1
M ^
g£
•a
ic
IP
>
^
4J JQ
•o "*
Sc
8
u C
ft U
u :
««s
3
00
Si
« I
(*
p
80
z*
omooiAmOQ<^*$O*sitsr>
fM
*AU*>fMO*«J(**^^V0*MP"tp^QQQO
r^ i-* ^4 fM Is* ^3®
^*tAOOfM^»p|>4Ofn's>OfS1(4>0^
OOOOf-^-OOOitOOO-t
00
lAco^iAMfMOO^fMtnnr^o^-T
ifi O © Q »J ^ M n* r-H ^ O ^O O *A
"^iO>OO^AQOr^N'4'COO^<* ^^ ^
OOOO^fsifMO^-ffOOOr-
» - ~ 2 5
r-vtAm«Jt©lAC\|sOrHQOQ»Q*OOO
•3* *£T 00 v> ^O >-* «
t-«r- Q*fi»^ ODOO*-|rnOfM
G t-J CM. r~> CM
» *-• CM
OOOOOQ^QQOOQOtA
•,-r('igCM^<'^
P-* vO C^ ^4 QO IA lA^tA^f^tOOO
r^kA MO*^ f**O CSIO^f^
(M *-• 00 »A
* ~*
CMfO*O
~* CM •-»
fMOcnrsiOncMCMoOPsiroficniA
h»
§Q O
5 00 Q^^S99OQQ9Q
»-« SeO(si5rio3'OO*SiA
-
r^.QOO^^^'OO'^SF'^^CONO^
^a- ^ ,4^^
UCACO«ltSuUfl«MOO««CQ
K^«M
^^^yrTttAtfStfjdj^v^Sin
iAtA(AtAiAlAtAiAlA«AlAtAtAiA
tA
•"•
»H
00
(M
*
iA
fM
*
pv
CM
5
o
8
iA
CM
I
CM
h*.
lA
§
00
00
o
o
CM
in
|
o>
(•4
O
HI
S
o
|T|
in
r*
-3
«*
^
^
-T
PH
-*
IA
»A
«M
O
in
O
s
o
Cvl
rg
fg
1
OK
CO
CM
8
(M
"
00
•
3
tA
N <4 N cs> «s»
0*> .-< O « N
o e* •»
0> <^ IA -- r^-
lA
P** 0* O f"- -<
00 fv -4 CM *
OP O fM •"* M
o
>A SO O "^ *
CM -Jj "v «-«
*-«
CT* ^^ ^1 *M
* lA
•tf
»A O IA O O
h- *-J »A *A O
^ (SJ _J
O» «M — 00 C*
i" O ^^ c*l \p
O
(SI
SO iA ^O *M
•-^ CM «-< tA
^ fO in
3 «*» *° C* ^
^ *-
•-I
lA CM tA tA O
••J CS| r+ *J lA
fM CM
CM CM -j o n
00 -H ^. s£.
(M m
(SI
O O 05 Q O
*st s
N
in tf\ c^ oo (^
«si n m CM
-------
APPENDIX H
STONY CREEK
Codes for tabular data
Source Type
page E-l through H-8
C - Combination Mine
D - Drift Mine
S - Strip Mine
Sh-Shaft Mine
Receiving Stream
R - Refuse Pile
P - Preparation Plant
A - Active
* - Tunnel
1. Stony Creek
2. Paint Creek
3. Little Paint Creek
4. Seese Run
5. Weaver Run
6. Shade Creek
7. Dark Shade Creek
8. Little Dark Shade Creek
9. Laurel Run
10. Beaverdam Run
(Shade Creek)
11. Miller Run
12. Roaring Fork
13. Solomon Run
14. Falls Run
15. Wells Creek
16. Oven Run
17. Bens Creek
18. S. F. Bens Creek
19. Soap Hollow Run
20. Reitz Creek
21. Schrock Run
22. Beaverdam Creek
(Stony Ireek)
23. Roaring Run
24. Quemahoning Creek
25. Higgins Run
26. Twomile Run
27. Lamberts Run
28. Spruce Run
29. Boone Run
30. Beaverdam Creek
(Quemahoning)
31. Grove Run
32. Calenders Run
33. Clear Run
H
-------
H-l
O CM O CM
O CM \O r-<
O CM CO *-* CO O
m co m CM oo O r-i
in I-H co O in
O o r-t o o CM
CM sO CO
O •* r->
CM in ro
o
r-t CM CM
mONOOOoONO'.tcocococoOr'.so
*-*EM»3'rHr-»(''«-u"'sOO*nroN0coinco
O -* O r-f
O O O O
CO co
r* O
ro ro ro CM
O O CM O
co m CM
OOoOr-iOcMininr».cM-i -*
CO CO rH CM
NO CM Csl 00
ro m ON
CO CM i-H
73 3
co m ON oo ON
%
m m CM
co co ro
CO CM CO ro
>
0) (U
CO O O CO
m m m co oo
O rH eg ro
m co ON
oo oo oo oo
CMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
CM CM CM CM CM
ininmmmminmmminininminininininminminm
-------
H-2
o
o
o
o
O rH
n o
t-^ O
1-1 O vO
l-« t*l
O
r-t ^ *O ^
o i-<
O CO
e
da;
O e
T* re
QJ 01
-------
H-3
X
.o.
"ff
X
rt
•o
>
X
T)
ff
X
>
X
5
\
-
6
>,
rt
ta
J?
.-i
i1
|
En
rH
ON
O
so
"*
CO
IA
*
CO
CM
0
tn
2
8
PJ
,_,
m
Q
r-l
CA
•*
-
CO
O
-0
CM
^
i-H
O
o
sO
8
CO
CO
CO
IA
tA
CM
8
so
CO
CM
Q
CO
r^.
CM
^
CO
IA
^
sD
sO
„
K
VO
s
in
rv
O
2
S
o
00
^o
o
ON
s
ON
1
CO
CM
Q
CO
CO
CM
•*
r-
r*.
rH
SO
rH
lA
i£>
sO
O
rH
3
CO
CM
O
ON
i—l
rH
O
CM
sO
sO
rH
O
sD
O
|
OO
CM
O
CO
tn
0
rM
CO
m
+
O
CO
^
sO
O
CS(
CO
lA
ro
S
lA
CO
|
3
CM
sO
O
CO
CO
ON
CM
O
m
CO
U"!
CM
n
so
CM
CO
rO
CO
so
ON
00
i-t
m
CO
fO
sO
0
00
CO
rH
lA
O
CO
O
CM
sO
IA
CO
O
CO
r-
5
8
0«
CM
«
sO
O
vO
CO
rH
sO
O
CT>
<—l
ON
O
ON
CM
CM
CM
O
CO
sO
f-
CM
ro
IA
CM
8
•a
8
lA
^
n
Q
00
m
in
O
in
00
tM
O
in
C.J
O
0
M
O
3
0
so
CM
O
8
r-
i-H
O
lA
8
CO
so
CO
C)
CO
rH
"*
lA
rH
0>
O
sO
CM
CM
^~*
fM
CO
O
ro
CM
§
<£>
t-t
0
O
0
O
in
CM
o
CO
o
0
SO
lA
CO
Q
O
IA
CO
lA
OincooOfOON*or«-coO(Mso(Mco
OrHOOwmcorHQOOOooo
O CM 00
O r-" r^
CM so ON O sO
rH 00 O> O
O CO rH IA
oo so o o ^- co m
O O O O O O co
—' O O
8 8
\O r-t rH
-------
H-4
X
S t3
C -O
3
rH rH
""If
n
^
rt
01 "^
W (Tj
>H 4J
U U
a*§
to c
o
U
33
a.
00
c
•5 3
0 4J
(U U)
a.
0)
U
V4 0)
3 P-
O X
W H
0) •
C O
ON
,_,
sD
SO
^
0
-
.
-t
sO
£
ro
0
00
ro
ON
CM
CO
,_(
CM
O
lA
00
in
*o
^
CM
Q
r.
CO
O
O
CM
rH
0
O
CO
O
o
.-*,
o
ro
O
CM
CO
0
ON
CM
0
CO
sD
^
CM
a
00
£
CM
Os
00
SO
rH
^.j.
rH
lA
CO
m
0
IT-.
o
CO
0
CM
O
CM
CM
O
O
00
ro
m
CO
CO
8
m
in
^
o
ON
in
tn
0
tn
f^
e*j
0
cs
O
O
0
•*
in
rg
00
m
vo
CM
«
in
CM
.n
^
Cvl
U
o
S
o
o
o
o
VO
,_,
«
^
0
CM
§
rH
00
o
CM
00
CM
"*
M
O
"
CO
SA
O
sO
O
m
rH
CM
sO
CM
o
CM
rH
fO
o
8
00
CM
CO
Q
lA
°
lA
CM
^,
•d-
^
00
CO
o
sO
^
O
CO
3
CO
rH
O
lA
CO
CO
O
CM
rH
0
CO
CO
O
CO
QO
•d-
lA
CO
CO
o
8
in
CM
CO
Q
0
S
o
so
O
^
CM
ON
0
O
ON
rH
O
so
ro
CM
ON
0
ON
«
8
O
r*.
CM
00
Ul
CM
-d-
IA
sO
in
CO
sO
^
1-t
tM
CTx
*$
o
CM
r-
§
CO
CO
'•O
CM
"*
IA
rH
(O
0
lA
o
o
sO
O\
CM
O
ro
S
rH
O
rH
ro
O
O
vO
rH
ro
"S|
O
CO
O
CO
so
CM
r-
M
CM
O
sO
ro
8
03
CM
Q
s.
S
ro
o\
O
sO
sD
O
00
^
J^
r*
CM
O
CO
Cs!
"A
T
r-,
IP
CO
ro
§
rH
lA
00
n
o
•3-
CO
ro
CO
so
O
"A
CO
O
ro
so
O
8
rH
O
tA
IA
00
*A
rH
sO
rH
00
rH
-1
If
CO
r-t
~
-vt
iA
CM
lA
"
sD
rH
"-'
O
O
vO
CO
o
rM
lA
lA
O
CO
O
O
CM
CM
Q
sO
lA
O
O
O
o
o
o
<*•
o
^
o
CO
CM
S
rH
1
lA
1
-H
o
o
so
^
Q
r^
iA
0
o
o
o
^
o
•JO
o
r-
'•*
CM
O
ro
rH
CO
CO
rH
CM
1
O
O
o
so
«M
(H
CO
£
O
o
o
o
ON
O
SC
O
-t
^
ON
ON
O
CM
rH
~J
CO
O
••O
CO
CM
I
0
ro
O
o
CM
(H
ON
tn
ro
O
m
CM
ro
rH
ON
O
0
_J
CO
so
o
m
sO
ro
CM
in
CM
O
O
CM
CM
*
O
tA
D
ro
lA
r-t
,_»
CM
^j
r-
r-
ON
CM
O
r.
0\
OS
ro
ON
^
O
CM
O
m
N.
"
O
o
CM
rH
ro
rH
Q
s,
iA
ro
U~l
CM
-------
H-5
B
o
£
£
tfl
X
n)
-O
C -<
rH rH
< ^
ff
« -0
OB -~-
U jO
C rH
«
CO
J --I
ff
^
fl)
M r-t
rH
O *"--
H eo
13
*o
0) rC
«J
MH
"1?
rt
CO "O
» ^
C rH
•a
14
rff t-l
* 1?
n
•a
*J ,£>
•O
O *-!
1
P
1
tn
0)
U
U C
•H n)
•fH U
0 =>
rti »rt
0. C
C/l O
o
£
MI
C
HI r»
O JJ
Of CO
pa
V
U
II
8 0-
ON
O
m
m
o
o
0
0
^
CM
Ov
O
00
r-
vO
CM
CO
0
rH
•-I
CM
8
O
sf
04
CM
m
o
o
rH
O
CM
O
CO
rH
O
rH
rH
r*.
00
m
§
3
CM
CO
0
ON
CM
0
in
rH
m
«
CO
CM
00
rH
s
r*-
CM
0
C*
o
00
0
o
5
^
CO
in
in
00
r-
rH
fH
NO
CO
o
CO
m
NO
CM
m
CM
§
CM
O
CO
a
1
CO
rH
NO
O
00
r-.
CO
00
CM
CO
rH
CO
CO
rH
o
m
m
rH
vO
O
CO
sO
**
rH
rH
CM
O
00
rH
8
•"*
CO
CO
fl
m
m
NO
CO
CM
rH
rH
ON
CO
m
*"*
NO
0
rH
rH
-d-
m
CM
NO
rH
O
CO
NO
CO
rH
ON
$
CO
00
ro
r-.
NO
00
CM
m
CM
8
CM
rH
Csl
fO
o
NO
3
ov
CM
oo
o
CM
0
CO
rH
CM
m
o
m
rH
m
CO
CM
m
rH
t-H
8
00
CO
CM
0
«T
0
CM
vO
a
Ov
vO
n
o
CM
vo
VO
CO
^
00
-5
Ov
vO
CM
O
r-l
1
CM
CO
CO
CM
m
ON
in
CM
m
o
m
rH
8
00
rH
^
•*
0
vO
r»
r^
n
CM
CM
rH
vD
vO
CO
00
Ov
vO
CO
rH
«J
00
vO
rH
O
00
OV
rH
f^
8
rH
CM
CO
Q
NO
rH
O
NO
rx
0
0
CM
NO
^
O
ON
O
^
in
in
m
ro
CM
CM
•tf
m
CM
CO
fH
8
CM
*H
CM
CO
O
i
o
o
rH
CM
m
o
m
2
CO
0
•o
,>.
rH
CM
O
00
m
fH
CM
CO
00
fH
CM
CO
1
rH
o
CO
U
1
f»
o
0\
CO
o
rx
"*
Ov
CM
Pvl
o
-it
in
O
CM
^
00
CM
0
CO
vO
st
-o
8
"-1
o
CO
U
Ov
vO
o
o
3
o
o
^
"^
o
o
CO
^
o
in
r-
o
g
0
o
m
-^
o
§
CM
O
CO
w
o
r*
l^
c*
O
0
CO
NO
"M
rH
CO
in
in
NO
0
NO
CM
CM
07
00
8
m
CO
CM
CM
NO
rs.
m
CM
CO
8
o
o
o
CO
a.
^
(M
|
CM
O
CO
O
CO
-»
in
o
d
0
o
CM
d
Ov
t-H
O
CM
r-t
t-H
*M
CM
in
§
m
3
CM
5
CM
CM
NO
CM
CM
CO
1
•H
ON
"*
Q
m
CO
CO
r —
ON
O
o
o
so
^
CO
ON
r^
2
m
o
in
3
o
§
o
in
rH
CO
8
CO
o
CO
Q
m
-------
H-6
(Tj
C rH
1
3
rH rH
""If
«
s^
cfl
60
C
S v^
If
X
H XI
rH
i-H
d)
0 rH
" t
cfl
E
•H a
a) a
ai
o
II
S£
00
rH
m
in
CM
00
CM
rH
m
ro
sf
CM
m
fv
rH
rH
m
NO
rH
m
NO
rv
CO
rH
O
CM
NO
00
rH
8
CM
NO
CM
O
CM
Q
t-t
m
in
NO
CM
00
ON
vt
rH
0
o
CO
o
o
0
^
0
o
0
CM
rH
Os
ON
CM
rH
CM
CO
CM
NO
O
CO
CO
rv
^
CM
W
m
tn
m
CM
•"*
NO
rH
wO
NO
r~*
tH
CO
CM
rv
NO
CM
CO
CM
00
8
o
o
rH
-------
H-7
£
H ja
C rH
•r-t
rH rH
'''if
s.
QJ *O
CO "x.
rH
g
rH
PM
111
O
o C
•H CD
•H (J
i.'B
M 0
*
1
0) 4)
O l-l
0)
o o>
si
O H
cn
o
c •
So
z
m
o
rH
CM
CO
CO
tO
rH
rH
0
in
0
to
CM
m
CS|
0
rH
Ot
O
CM
O
CO
CO
00
o
(SI
O
§
^
"^
CM
Ul
m
m
00
00
rH
O
-*
Ot
CO
in
2
rH
o>
rH
O
CO
8
cn
rH
CM
m
DO
CM
rH
vO
rH
00
O
lA
vO
O
^
O
00
in
in
CM
0
*,
rH
rH
O
CO
o
o
o
xt
o
m
m
o
CM
ON
CM
CM
xt
CM
VO
0
rH
g
CO
to
"^
I/I
CM
rH
m
i-.
CSI
to
0,
r»
*t
o
rH
ON
<*
m
vO
o
CM
o
vO
fX,
rH
CO
o
X*
ON
rH
O
lA
»^
0
m
in
rH
CM
O
in
8
00
m
§
CO
CM
CO
01
CO
(SI
in
r-
O
CM
in
ot
^
O
s
CM
O
rH
rH
00
O
rH
0
lA
rx.
^
CM
en
lA
iA
00
CM
rH
O
o
o
xt
(s|
CO
CO
(SI
m
m
o
o
o
0
CJ>
O
to
CM
r-*
rH
to
J.
rH
rH
(SI
m
CO
in
o
CM
rH
CM
CO
in
o
rH
O
CO
8
en
IA
rx,
CM
O
CM
lA
»A
CM
O
IA
0
00
CM
xt
^
ON
CM
O
lA
CM
I"*-
in
lA
00
rH
ON
iA
O
3
rH
3
rH
lA
00
cn
CM
en
§
en
CM
cn
CM
r*
CM
IA
IA
rx,
cn
rH
fx.
0
rH
CM
o
CM
ON
rH
O
Ot
CO
(SI
00
o
Csl
00
rH
rH
09
•3
CO
00
m
CM
"
J-
I
lA
CM
CM
&
00
CM
IA
in
ON
PX
CTt
rH
1-4
^
CO
rH
in
.0
(SI
ON
CO
•H
CM
O
CM
in
to
00
OS
>o
rH
O
m
CM
in
in
o
m
CO
m
CO
rH
a
in
in
in
00
00
O
(SI
^
o-
o •
m
CO
00
o
Ot
(SI
in
Ot
CM
in
CM
(SI
rH
tO
m
rH
tO
CO
o
m
rH
CO
o
*
in
in
o
0
co
o
rH
O
CM
2
O
O
vO
rH
IA
rH
O
ON
CM
rH
o
CM
tr
(-1
^
^
m
o
tO
csl
in
o
00
(SI
rH
00
O
^
O
rH
00
%
m
rH
8
00
rx
cn
9
r-
o
00
o
00
o
oo
CM
rx
^
O
ON
xt
rH
lA
lA
CM
O
IA
CO
0
rH
CM
O
cn
r-.
CM
lA
O
8
to
•*
00
in
in
0-
^
in
IT
(O
^
rH
en
CO
rH
rH
CM
-0
00
00
vO
rH
lA
rx,
0
rH
0
CM
en
vO
vO
en
vO
lA
ON
CM
ON
O
cn
rH
O
8
^
m
rH
9
-------
sOvfrcooorHOcoomo
CMOOOOOlO-^OrHvJ
O CO O O
GO CO O CM
ooooooooooo
mcoooooooom
8
8
co o o
CM O r-* O O O O
CM co o r-.
ocMinoooooomo O' o o o
in Os rHCO*3:-tfCOCMCMO*n*^'*tfCMO
rH cs| \O CM 0*i *O in O
O CM CO rH O O
O CO CO O
\o o o
O O\ co
CM
3 3 ° §
moooooooooooo
co o in
§
*ri{r)r-tC*4r-4r-»C*4*O
OoOQOfOCMCOCOvO
CM CO O
rH m CO
o m o
0
3
m o o o
^ CM CM CM
8
00
*n o
CM O
m m
oo CM o m CT» «o I-H
co CM co so co m r*»
in oo
oo CM
ovOvoofOcMOcM ^OCMCM**
cocomcMinfor^r-. voininmo
r-»coi-icorH^-cM mcricorHCM
O CO rH 1^
------- |