FOURTH SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE

IN THE MATTER OF POLLUTION OF LAKE MICHIGAN

         AND ITS TRIBUTARY BASIN

            IN THE  STATES OF

WISCONSIN,  ILLINOIS, INDIANA, AND  MICHIGAN
               VOLUME  III


           (Part 1 of 3 Parts)
           Bal Tabarin Room
             Sherman House
           Chicago, Illinois
           September 21, 1972
                      t-sissociates
         COURT AND CONVENTION REPORTING
            1372 THURELL ROAD
           COLUMBUS. OHIO 43229
               614 . 846.3682

-------
ii


2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21

22

23

24

25

CONTENTS

Executive Session
Opening Remarks - Francis T. Mayo
Dale S. Bryson
Arthur W. Dybdahl
Yates M. Barber, Jr.
Robert J. Catlin
Ted Falls
Jim Jontz
Sylvia Troy
Mrs. Florence C. Dale
Charles W. Kern
Great Lakes Task Force, A.A.U.W.
Coalition for the Environment, Inc.
Carlos Fetterolf
Ralph W. Purdy
Alma T. Voita
0. K. Petersen
A. Joseph Dowd

William L. Blaser

David Dinsmore Comey

Mrs. Lee Botts

South Shore Commission

John C. Berghoff

Angela M. Pieroni

Page
492
498
503
521
541
5^3
612
627
Following 631
Following 631
632
Following 635
Following 635
636
642
663
668
685

701

714

724

Following 725

Following 725

Following 725

-------
                                                               iii
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 3
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CONTENTS, Continued:
Jill and Ray Lending
Mrs. Linda Traub
Mrs. Harry J. Schultz and family
Marilyn and Edward Beis
Mr, and Mrs, Jonathan R. Fiske
Pat and Al Bullock
Anne Brinkman
Chris Washburn
Tom and Theresa Forman
Mark J, Carter
Mrs, Eileen L, Johnston
Dr, Wesley 0. Pipes
Dr, Jacob Verduin
Dr, Donald W. Pritchard
Dr, Donald C, McNaught
Dr, Edward C, Raney
0, D, Butler
Dr* G« Fred Lee
Discussion - Commonwealth Edison Testimony
Charles Muchmore
Dr, Paul R, Harrison
Ann Chellman
Mrs. Catherine T. Quigg
Dr, James E, Carson
         Page
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
Following 725
          732
          743
          750a
          773
          739
          304
          313
          344
          353
          362
          391
Following 393
Following 393
Following 393
Following 393

-------
1

2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

16

17

IS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CONTENTS, Continued:
|

Arthur Pancoe Following
Dr» Philip F. Gustafson
Evans W. James (as read by Charles J. Marnell)
Sarah Jenkins
Sol Bur stein
Paul Keshishian
James A. Rogers (as read by Thomas G. Frangos)
Miriam G. Dahl Following
Thomas G, Frangos
Paul Oppenheimer
Closing Remarks - Francis T. Mayo
- - -
Documents received following the closing of the
conference:

The Honorable Adlai £. Stevenson, III Following

Daniel R. Smith, Kalamazoo Nature Center
for Environmental Education Following
Scott Fisher Following
	 	






'age
— a__
393
399
907
915
919
926
931
935
936
941
944




944


944
944







-------
 1             Fourth Session of the Conference in the Matter of

 2   Pollution of Lake Michigan and Its Tributary Basin, in the

 3   States of Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan, held

 4   in the Bal Tabarin Room of the Sherman House, Chicago,

 5   Illinois, on Thursday, September 21, 1972, at S:30 a.m.

 6                             	

 7             PRESIDING:

               Francis T. Mayo, Regional Administrator,
 9
               UtS. Environmental Protection Agency,
10
               Region V, Chicago, Illinois.
11


               CONFEREES:
13
               Thomas G. Frangos, Administrator, Division
14
               of Environmental Protection, Wisconsin
15
               Department of Natural Resources, Madison,
16
               Wisconsin.
17

               William L. Blaser, Director, Environmental

19             Protection Agency, State of Illinois,

20             Springfield, Illinois.

21             Perry E. Miller, Technical Secretary, Stream

22             Pollution Control Board, Indiana State

               Board of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
   I
24

25

-------
                                                                vi
 1             CONFEREES, Continued$
 o
               Ralph W. Purdy, Executive Secretary,
 3
               Michigan Water Resources Commission,
 4
               Lansing, Michigan.
 5
               James 0. McDonald, Director, Enforcement
 6
               Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
 7
               Agency, Region V, Chicago, Illinois.
 8
 9             ALTERNATE CONFEREES:
10
               Francis H. Schraufnagel, Director, Bureau
               of Standards and Surveys, Division of
12
               Environmental Protection, Wisconsin Depart-
               ment of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin.
14
               Carl T. Blomgren, Manager, Standards
               Section, Division of Water Pollution
16
               Control, Illinois Environmental Protection
17
 d             Agency, Chicago, Illinois.
lo
19             David P. Currie, Chairman, Illinois
20  I           Pollution Control Board, Chicago,
21             Illinois.
2?
               Oral H. Hert, Director, Water Pollution
23
               Control Division, Indiana State Board  of
24  !
               Health, Indianapolis,  Indiana.
25

-------
                                                              VI1
 1
 2
               Carlos Fetterolf, Chief Environmental

 •3
 J             Scientist, Michigan Water Resources


               Commission, Lansing, Michigan,


 5
               Dale S. Bryson, Deputy Director, Enforcement

 6

               Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

 7

               Region V, Chicago, Illinois.
 8


 9


10             PARTICIPANTS:



11
12
13
15

               ALTERNATE CONFEREES, Continued
               Arthur W. Dybdahl, National Field Investigations


     Center, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Environmental Protection


     Agency, Denver, Colorado.


               Yates M. Barber, Jr., Fish and Wildlife Adminis-


     trator, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, U.S»


     Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.


               Robert J. Catlin, Director, Division of Environ- .


     mental Affairs, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington,


     D.C.


               Walter Belter, Senior Environmental Engineer,


     U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C.

22 '
               Ted Falls, Porter County Indiana Chapter, Izaak

2?
 J   Walton League of America, Wheeler, Indiana.


2k.
               Jim Jontz, President, Indiana Eco-Coalition,

25
     Valparaiso, Indiana.

-------
                                                               viii
 1             PARTICIPANTS,  Continued:

 2             Charles W,  Kern,  Environmental Technologist,

 3   Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Hammond,  Indiana,

 ^             Great Lakes Task Force of the Northeast  Central

     Region of the American Association of University Women,

     Indiana State Division, as represented by Mrs. L.  W. (Helen
 •j
     K») Bieker, Chairman, Indiana; Mrs, E, Horowitz, Illinois;
 <*
     Mrs, Joan Weikle, Ohio; Mrs. Jane Lahy, Michigan;  Miss G.
 o
     Freudenreich, Wisconsin,

               Mrs, Ethyle R. Bloch, Chairman, Coalition for

     the Environment, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
12
               Alma T. Voita, Bridgman, Michigan.

               0, K, Petersen, Attorney, Consumers Power Company,
14
     Jackson, Michigan,

               A. Joseph Dowd, Associate General Counsel,
16
     American Electric Power Service Corporation, New York, New
17
   •  York.
18
               James B. Henry, Chief Counsel, American Electric
19 I
     Power  Service  Corporation,  New York,  New York*
20 I
               David Dinsmore Comey, Director of Environmental
21
     Research, Businessmen for the  Public  Interest,  Chicago,
22
     Illinois.
23
               Mrs. Lee Botts, Executive  Secretary,  Lake Michigan
24 I
     Federation,  Chicago,  Illinois.
25

-------
                                                                ix
1
               PARTICIPANTS, Continued:
 o
               John C. Berghoff, Attorney, Chicago, Illinois.


 ^             Angela M. Pieroni, President, Pollution Fighters


     Committee, Chicago, Illinois.


               Jill and Ray Lending, Evanston, Illinois.


               Mrs. Linda Traub, Evanston, Illinois.

 7
               Mrs. Harry J. Schultz and family, Cicero, Illinois.

 8
               Marilyn and Edward Beis, Evanston, Illinois*

 9
               Mr. and Mrs. Jonathan R. Fiske, Evanston, Illinois.


               Pat and Al Bullock (letter submitted by Lake


     Michigan Federation).

12
               Anne Brinkman (letter submitted by Lake Michigan

13
     Federation) .

14
               Chris Washburn (letter submitted by Lake Michigan


     Federation) •

16
               Tom and Theresa Forman (letter submitted by Lake

17
     Michigan Federation).

IB
               Mark J. Carter, Northwestern Students for a Better

19
     Environment, Evanston, Illinois,

20
               Mrs. Eileen L. Johnston, Wilmette, Illinois.

21 I
               Dr. Wesley 0. Pipes, Professor of Civil Engineering
22
     and Professor of Biological Sciences, Northwestern University

23
     Evanston, Illinois.
24

               Dr. Jacob Verduin, Professor of Botany, Southern
25

     Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois.

-------
 1             PARTICIPANTS, Continued:
 2
               Dr, Donald W, Pritchard, Director, Chesapeake Bay
 o
     Institute; Professor of Oceanography, The Johns Hopkins
 4
     University, Baltimore, Maryland.
               Dr. Donald C. McNaught, Associate Professor of
     Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Albany,
 7
     New York,
 8
               Dr, Edward C. Raney, Professor of Zoology, Emeritus
 9
     Cornell University, Ithaca, New York,
10
               Oliver D, Butler, Glen Ellyn, Illinois,
               Dr, G, Fred  Lee, Professor of Water Chemistry,
12 I
     University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin,
13
               Charles Muchmore, P.E., Member of the Department
14
     of Thermal and  Environmental  Engineering, Southern Illinois
15
     University,  Carbondale, Illinois.
16
               Dr, Paul R.  Harrison, Chicago Technical Society,
17
      Council,  Chicago,  Illinois.
18
               Ann Chellman, Palatine, Illinois,
19
               Mrs.  Catherine T, Quigg, Vice President, Pollution
20 I
      and  Environmental  Problems, Palatine, Illinois.
21
               Dr. James  E, Carson, Argonne National Laboratory,
22
      Argonne,  Illinois.
23
               Dr, Philip F,  Gustafson, Associate  Director,
24
      Division of  Radiological and Environmental Research, Argonne
25
      National Laboratory,  Argonne, Illinois,

-------
                                                                xi
 1             PARTICIPANTS, Continued:

 P
               Evans W. James, Senior Vice President, Wisconsin

 •3
 J   Public Service Corporation, Green Bay, Wisconsin.


 *             Charles J, Marnell, Environmental Engineer,


     Pioneer Service and Engineering Company, Chicago, Illinois.


               Sarah Jenkins, Member, Executive Committee, John

 7
     Muir Chapter, Sierra Club, Madison, Wisconsin.
 g
               Sol Burstein, Senior Vice President, Wisconsin

 9
     Electric Power Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

10
               Paul Keshishian, Director, Power Production,


     Wisconsin Power and Light Company, Madison, Wisconsin.

12
               James A. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General,

13
     Wisconsin Justice Department, Madison, Wisconsin.

14
               Miriam G. Dahl, Wisconsin State Division, Izaak


     Walton League of America, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

16
               Paul Oppenheimer, Hyde Park-Kenwood Community

17
     Conference, Chicago, Illinois.

18
               The Honorable Adlai  E. Stevenson, III, U.S.

19
     Senate, Washington, D.C.

20
               Daniel R. Smith, President, Board of Trustees,

21
     Kalamazoo Nature Center for Environmental Education,
22
     Kalamazoo, Michigan.

23
               Scott Fisher, Natural Resources Institute, Ball

24
     State University, Muncie, Indiana.

25
               Arthur Pancoe, SAVE, Glencoe, Illinois.

-------
              	xii

               PARTICIPANTS, Continued:
               Sylvia Troy, President, Save the Dunes Councilf
               Mrs, Florence C, Dale, Chesterton, Indiana,
               Arthur Pancoe, Scientific-Director, Society Against
     Violence to the Environment, iChicago,  Illinois.
 6
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

-------
                        	492


                         Executive Session
 2
 3                       EXECUTIVE SESSION
                         September  21,  1972
 4

 5
               MR. MAYO:  For purposes of the record, the first
 6
     Executive Session of the reconvened Fourth Session in the
 7
     Lake Michigan Water Pollution Water Quality Conference is
 a
     in session.
 9
               The conferees have had an opportunity to take a
10
     look at the schedule that we are faced with for the remainder
11
     of the day.  At least three of the conferees have indicated
12
     they will not be available to continue the conference session
13
     through until tomorrow and there is a strong desire to com-
14
     plete the discussion on the thermal issues, if at all
15
     possible, today, even though it may mean running into the
16
     early or mid-evening.
17
               When we closed or adjourned yesterday, it was for
18
     the purpose of moving into Executive Session this morning

     to discuss and develop recommendations on the nonthermal
20
     issues currently before the conferees.
21
               Now it seems obvious that the conferees are not
22
     going to be able to work their way through that material

     in time to accommodate the full discussion of the thermal
24
     issues today in order to permit an adjournment of this

-------
 3
 4
 5
 8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
                                                               493
                     Executive Session
session sometime this evening.
          I gather it is the sense of the conferees that we
set a date certain for an Executive Session to consider the
nonthermal issues before the conference — to consider at
least the nonthermal issues before the conference;  and then
we wait until we have heard all of the material this evening
to determine when we would desire to sit in Executive Session
to develop conclusions and recommendations on the thermal
question.
          As I understand it, the date generally agreeable
for an Executive Session on at least the nonthermal issues
is October 25, is that correct, gentlemen?
          MR. FRANCOS:  Yes.
          MR. MAYO:  We will attempt to confirm this room
for that date at 9:00 a.m. on the 25th.  We will also reserve
it for the 26th.
          I believe each of the conferees has a list of the
parties desirous of making statements on the thermal issue
today and with some indications of the time requirements.
As I add up the time requirements it comes to something over
5 hours, and that doesn't include an indication of the State
presentations.
          Do we have some idea how long those presentations
      are likely to  take?   How about  the  Federal presentation?

-------
                                                               494





 -^                        Executive  Session



 2             MR.  BLASER:  Well,  for Illinois,  5  minutes —  that



 o   is the State — but we have got a number of members of the



 ^   public, interested parties.



 5             MR.  MAYO:  Well,  we have a list of  all of the



 6   interested parties, and I think you have a copy of that.



 7   What we don't  have on the list  is some idea of how much  time



 g   the State's item might take.



 9             MR.  BLASER:  For Illinois 5 minutes.



10             MR.  MAYO:  How about  the Federal?



11             MR.  BRYSON:  In addition to what is listed,  it



12   will be approximately 30 minutes.



13             MR.  MAYO:  Another 30 minutes?



14             MR.  BRYSON:  Yes, sir.



15             MR.  MAYO:  Michigan?



16             MR.  PURDY:  Ten minutes.



17             MR.  MAYO:  Indiana?



IB             MR.  MILLER:  None.



19             MR.  MAYO:  Wisconsin?



20             MR.  FRANCOS:  About 15 minutes plus or minus.



21             MR.  MAYO:  We have got something in the neigh-



22   borhood of 6 hours plus — 6 and a half hours of statements



23   to be made.



24             Considering the fact that there are probably a



25   number of interested people who expected us to take at least

-------
   	495





 1                        Executive Session



 2   until mid-morning with the Executive Session, and may not



 3   get here until 10:00 or very close to 10:00 o'clock, I



 4   suggest we start the program on the thermal question at



 5   10:00; go to 12:45, again, for lunch; return at 1:45; take



 6   a break in the evening, perhaps sometime between 4:30 and 6:00



 7   for an hour and a half; get back at 6:00; and then continue



 8   for the time that we need to complete the thermal presenta-



 9   tions and the inquiries on the part of the conferees.  And



10   I would gauge that this would take us probably until about



11   3:00 o'clock.



12             Do the conferees have any comments they want to



13   make on that basic arrangement?  Is that generally accept-



14   able?



15             Tom.



16             MR. FRANCOS:  Well, perhaps being a little bit



17   optimistic, but I would suggest that we see how we are run-



     ning around 3:00 o'clock or so and perhaps if it looks like



19   we might make it, try and continue through rather than



20   stopping at 4:30.



21             MR. MAYO:  My principal concern is Mrs. Hall and



22   her need sometime in the early evening for a break.



               MR. FRANCOS:  Well, all I am suggesting is we see



     where we are at 3:00 o'clock, and perhaps we might make


25
     some adjustments.

-------
   	496





 1                        Executive Session



 2             It might be  some incentive for Mrs. Hall if she



 3   thinks we can  conclude by about 6:00 o'clock.



 4             MR.  MAYO:  One of the things we ought to do, then,



 5   when we get back  into  the conference session proper will be



 6   to make a very direct  request that the statements be made



 7   as brief as possible.  We will accept them into the record



 &   as read, for review and deliberation by the conferees.  We



 9   will accept them  in as if read.



10             If that is generally agreed, gentlemen, I suggest



11   that what we do is to  adjourn this Executive Session until



12   the 25th of October and get back into the regular session



13   of the conference at 10:00 o'clock this morning, if that



14   is agreeable to you.



15             I think it would be inappropriate to start right



16   now on the thermal issues because it seems fairly obvious



17   to me that there  are some interested parties not available



13   in the audience who probably expected the Executive Session



19   to take until  at  least mid-morning.



20             Is that generally acceptable to you, gentlemen?



21             MR.  FRANCOS:  Yes.



22             MR.  BLASER:  Fine with Illinois.



23             MR.  MILLER:  les.



24             MR.  MAYO:  Mr. Purdy?



25             MR.  PURDY:   Yes.

-------
                                                              497
 1                        Executive Session
 2             We will reconvene the conference at 10:00 a.m.
 3   and, again, our presentation is dealing with the thermal
 4   issue relating to water quality in Lake Michigan.
 5             (The Executive Session adjourned at 9:15 a.m.)
 6
 7
 S
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19  l
20
21
22
23
24
25

-------
                                                                498
 1
 2
 3
 4
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
20
                         F. Mayo
                 THURSDAY MORNING SESSION
          MR. MAYOs  The Fourth Session of the Lake Michigan
Water Quality Enforcement Conference is now back in session.
By way of a brief explanation, you will recall, as we recessed
yesterday afternoon, the conferees agreed to meet this morn-
ing at 8:30 in Executive Session to attempt to develop conclu-
sions and recommendations concerning the nonthermal issues
addressed by the conferees up to this point.
          The conferees were faced with the fact that at
least three of the conferees are not going to be available
tomorrow and that there is, then, an urgent need to attempt
in a very serious way to conclude the discussion on the
thermal issues today even though it means remaining fairly
     late this evening.
•L/ !            The conferees decided that because of the amount of
18
time that would be required to review and agree on recommenda-
tions on the nonthermal questions that they would not attempt
     to take up a good deal of time this morning or perhaps into
OT
   |  the afternoon on those issues in Executive Session,  and they
22
     have agreed to meet at a date certain, October 25,  and if
     necessary October 26, here in Chicago, in Executive Session,
01
     to deal with at least the nonthermal issues in the  development
25
     of conclusions and recommendations.

-------
   	499
 1                            F.  Mayo
 2             In order that we would have as many of the
 3   interested parties available for the commencement of the
 4   discussion on the thermal issues, we then adjourned the
 5   Executive Session and agreed that we would not come back
 6   into the regular session of the conference until 10:00
 7   o'clock this morning.
 8             We have now returned to the regular session.  We
 9   will be proceeding with the presentations in this order:
10   first, the Federal presentations, followed by those of
11   Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and general public
12   presentations.  Each of the States has been requested to
13   manage its own time; each of the States has the parties
14   interested in making presentations identified.
15             We have a very, very full  schedule.  It appears
16   that we are faced with  something in  the order of 5 to 6 hours
17   of presentations.
IS             Idfe will proceed until 12:45j break for lunch until
!9   1:45; return to  session at  1:45.  We will  decide sometime  in
20   the mid-afternoon how much  of a  break  to take until  the early
21   evening,  and gauge the  extent to which we  will  be able to
22   finish  the  thermal presentations at  a  reasonable time this
2^   evening.
2/»-              it is  our  earnest desire,  with those  who  are mak-
     ing presentations, to  be as brief as possible but,  at the

-------
                                                               500

 1                            R. Purdy
 2   same time not at the expense of those issues which they feel
 3   are really important for consideration by the conferees.
 4             All of the statements that are available for pre-
 5   sentation can be submitted for the record as if read, and
 6   in that respect summarized to the extent practicable in the
 7   judgment of those parties offering the statements.  As you
 8   come forward to present your statement, whether it is going
 9   to be read in its entirety or will be submitted for the
10   record as if read, a copy should be left with the recorder.
11   If it is your desire to have the statement submitted as if
12   read, that brief comment should be made at the opening of
13   your individual presentation.
14             Mr,. Purdy, I understand, has one piece of corres-
15   pondence that he wants to introduce for the record && a
16   carryover from yesterday's business.
17             MR. PURDT:  Yes, Mr. Mayo.  I received a letter
1#   today from the Michigan Department of Agriculture signed
19   by Donald R.  Islelb,  the Science Advisor, and he asked that
20   certain facts that he has set forth in this letter be placed
21   in the conference record.
22             It primarily relates to effects that he feels are
23   attributed in the DDT-dieldrin report to pesticides or to
2^   DDT and that, in fact, new information has shown that many
25   of these effects are attributable to PCB's now that we have

-------
                                                              501
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
                              E. Purdy
     additional  information.
               And if you could have one of your staff make
     copies of this and distribute it to the conferees and to
     the recorder, then I will not read it and just ask that it
     be placed in the record.
               MR. MAYO:  All right.  It will be placed in the
     record and the necessary copies will be provided to the
     conferees.
               (The  document above referred to follows in its
     entirety.)

-------
                                      STATE OF MICHIGAN
AGRICULTURE                                     ":~
  COMMISSION                                    V'T"";.
                                             O '- '-,'
REBECCA TOMPKINS
  Chapman                               VVIIUAM G. MILUKEN, Governor
                             DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
H. THOMAS DEWHIRST                   LEWIS -CASS BUILDING, LANSING, MICHIGAN 43913
 Secretary
                                         8. DALE BALL, Director
JOA PENZIEN
CHARLES DONALDSON                          September 18, 1972


          Mr. Ralph Purdy
          Executive Secretary
          Michigan Water Resources
            Commission
          c/o Sherman House
          Chicago, Illinois

          Dear Mr. Purdy:

          I have noted several  errors  in the conclusions of the report  "An Evaluation
          of DDT and Dieldrin in Lake  Michigan" by  the Lake Michigan Interstate Pesticides
          Committee of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference.  Time  has not allowed
          me to determine whether or not the conclusions are based on erroneous sections
          in the Report, or  conclusions  drawn in error from data which  are correct.

          The conclusions which are in error are:

          10.  (p. 2)  The most  important commercial species in Lake Michigan  (according
               to Michigan DNR-Fisheries Division statistics) is whitefish, with
               2,379,148 lb. caught in 1971.  Next are chub (2,000,226  lb.),  followed
               by smelt (1,082,489 lb.).  None of these species, nor any other commercial
               fish species, has been  essentially prevented by DDT levels in  excess of
               5 ppm.  Only  coho and lake trout are regularly observed  above  5 ppm —
               neither is a  commercial species.

          11.  (p. 2)  Michigan  eliminated all but medical  (human ectoparasite control)
               and two very  limited rodent control uses of DDT by regulation in 1969.
               I believe this was the  first determination  to stop the general use of
               DDT anywhere  in  the United States.

          12.  (p. 2)  I believe Mr. Wayne Tody of the Michigan DNR has  concluded that
               DDT is riot responsible  for failures in coho reproduction under controlled
               condition in  hatcheries,  where adult fish and eggs are demonstrated to
               contain significant levels (10 ppm or aizxove) of DDT.   It might be accurate
               to describe this matter as "unresolved" mntil similar studies are con-
               cluded on all species from Lake Michigan, but the implication of item  12.
               is that fish  reproduction potential is limited by pesticides.
THF   •'  ,
C M I AT  '   1

Li'';      /
STATfc     /

-------
Mr. Purdy
Page 2
September 18, 1972


13.  (p. 2)  The potential effect that may exist on domestic and wild animals
     appears to be pure speculation.  If PCB's have such an effect, this
     should be treated separately from pesticides.

Two important items are absent from the Conclusions — and presumably from the
body of the report:

     1.  That USDI-BSFW scientists have some evidence that DDT levels in Lake
         Michigan (fish) are declining, apparently at rates faster than
         originally forecast.

     2.  That effects once attributed to DDT and/or other chlorinated hydro-
         carbon pesticides may in fact have been due to PCB's, which were
         long confused with these pesticides analytically.

It seems entirely possible to me that society may need to employ pesticides
in its own best interests from time to time.  Unless the facts concerning
pesticides are carefully and truthfully documented and summarized, any such
decision may be unfairly influenced.  It is especially important for agencies
of Federal and State governments to preserve objectivity and accuracy for this
reason.  I will appreciate your directing the attention of the Lake Michigan
Enforcement Conference to the errors I have identified, in hopes they may be
corrected by Conference action.
                                    Yours truly,
                                    D. R.  Isleib
                                    Science Advisor
DRIrlad

cc: Director Ball
    Stan 'Quackenbush
    Dean Lovitt
    John Calkins

-------
                                                               502

 1                             F. Mayo
 2             MR. MAYO:  I have one brief announcement that I
 3   would like to make relating in part to yesterday's discus-
 4   sion as it dealt with storm and combined sewers and issues
 5   of phosphorus and the upgrading of existing secondary treat*-
 6   ment plants*
 7             A 3-day Symposium on Storm and Combined Sewer Over-
     flows, Upgrading Existing Secondary Treatment Plants, and
 9   Technology of Phosphorus Removal is scheduled for November
10   2&, 29 and 30 at the Sherman House here in downtown Chicago,
11   Attendance at the symposium will be somewhat limited, and par-
12   ticipation is encouraged by consulting engineers and State
13   regulatory officials.  An information brochure and a regis-
14   tration form for the symposium will be available in the next
     2 weeks.
               One day will be devoted to each topic, as I said,
     the topics being:  Storm and Combined Sewer Overflows;
     Upgrading of Existing Secondary Treatment Plants; and the
19   third day, the Technology of Phosphorus Removal.  And those
     having an interest should leave their name and mailing
21   address at the conference table in the lobby
22
               The symposium is being sponsored by U.S. EPA,
     Research and Monitoring Division, and will provide the
P i
     latest information available to us in the state of the art
25
     for each of these topics

-------
                                                                503
                               D. Bryson
 2             We will proceed, at this point,  with the Federal
 3   presentation dealing with the thermal question.
               MR. BRYSON:  I will be presenting the statement
 5   for the EPA.
 6             MR. MAYO:  Please introduce yourself, Mr. Bryson.
 7
                 STATEMENT OF DALE S. BRYSON, CHIEF,
 9                  ENFORCEMENT BRANCH,  REGION  V,
10              U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
11                        CHICAGO,  ILLINOIS
12
13             MR.  BRYSON:  My name is Dale Bryson.  I am Chief
14   of the Enforcement Branch of Region V, U.S. EPA.
15             I have distributed to each of the conferees copies
16   of the EPA statement on the thermal question.  I will not be
17   reading the full document but instead will present certain
     remarks and summarize as necessary the attached documents.
19              (The document above referred to follows in its
20   entirety*)
21
22
23
24
25

-------
                REPORT OF
   THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   TO
THE LAKE MICHIGAN ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
                   ON
            THERMAL QUESTION
             SEPTEMBER, 1972

-------
             UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                     STATEMENT ON  THERMAL QUESTION
                 LAKE MICHIGAN ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
                            SEPTEMBER,  1972
     I have distributed to each of you  copies  of the EPA statement
on the thermal question.   I will not be reading  the full  document
but instead will  present certain remarks and summarize  as necessary
the attached documents.
     I think it would be appropriate to discuss  briefly the background
of the thermal question to refresh your memories and to Inform the
audience.
Background
     At the First Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement  Conference
held on January 31, February 1-2,  February 5-7,  March  7-8,  and March 12,
1968 in Chicago,  Illinois, the conferees discussed  the  rapidly Increasing
construction of nuclear power generating stations designed  to use  Lake
Michigan water for cooling.  They  found that,  in addition to one existing
nuclear power plant, five more were proposed,  or under  construction  at
Lake Michigan cities and projected for  completion between 1970 and 1973,
They agreed that  the combined impact of siting many reactors on the  shores
of the Lake must  be considered so  that  this activity would  not result In
pollution from wastewater heat or  from  the discharge of excessive  amounts
of radionuclides.  The following recommendation  was made:
     "The States  and the Department of the Interior will appoint
     members of a special committee on  nuclear discharges and the
     thermal pollution aspects of power plants and  reactors.

-------
                                 -2-
     The committee will meet with representatives of the Atomic
     Energy Commission and other interested parties to develop
     guidelines for pollution control from nuclear power plants.
     The committee is to pay special attention to thermal dis-
     charges which affect the aquatic life environment of the
     lake.  Representatives of the committee will be available
     to appear before any Federal or State agency considering
     approval of a permit for such power plants and reactors."
     The Committee on Nuclear Power Plant Waste Disposal held Its first
meeting on May 27, 1968, followed by numerous work sessions over the
next few months.  They produced an extensive report which was presented
at the Second Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, held
in Chicago on February 25, 1969,  While the committee did reach some
tentative conclusions on certain aspects of the thermal issue, the main
theme of their report was that sufficient information was not available
to permit establishment of a basin-wide regulation on power plant waste
disposal.
     The conferees at the February 25, 1969 Session expressed disappoint-
ment that the committee was unable to recommend a strong thermal  pollution
policy to the conferees.  The Second Session of the Lake Michigan Enforce-
ment Conference made the following recommendation:
     "6.   Nuclear Discharges and Thermal Pollution
     The report of the committee was accepted by the conferees for
     consideration.   One of the recommendations of the report was
     for further study t  and this will be taken under consideration by
     the States and the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.

-------
                                 -3-
     It will be necessary to determine whether nuclear discharges
     and thermal pollution are covered by the State water quality
     standards, particularly in regard to thermal pollution.   The
     FWPCA recommended that the State and Federal Conferees
     establish a committee to make specific recommendations to
     the conference on this problem. "
     The thermal question was discussed by the conferees at the March 31,
April 1, and May 7, 1970 Executive Sessions and a variety of proposals
were made.  At this latter session the conferees agreed that a series of
technical sessions would be necessary to evaluate the thermal question.
These workshop sessions were held on September 28-30 and October 1-2,
1970 and were devoted solely to the thermal question.
     At the October 29, 1970 Executive Session, the conferees authorized
the formation of a technical committee to specifically review the various
proposals that had been made on this question.  The committee's report
was presented at the March 23-25, 1971 session.  At this session extensive
time was again devoted to the subject of waste heat discharges.  On the
basis of the full discussion on the question, the conferees made certain
findings and recommendations.
     These findings and recommendations were approved by EPA Administrator
William D. Ruckelshaus on May 14, 1971.  In the case of Items 18 and 25,
where the conferees were unable to reach a unanimous position, Mr, Ruckelshaus
supported the Federal position and requested the concurrence of the reluctant
conferee.

-------
                                 -4-
State Actions
     Subsequent to the issuance of the approved findings and recommen-
dations by Mr. Ruckelshaus, the four Lake Michigan States took certain
actions relating to implementing the conference recommendations.   While
the  individual States will undoubtedly be reporting this information
1n greater detail, I would like to present a summary of their actions
at this time.
     MICHIGAN:  On August 7, 1971, the Michigan Water Resources
                Commission, Department of Natural  Resources, adopted
                temperature standards for Interstate and Intrastate
                Waters of the State of Michigan.  These standards
                established two zones within Lake Michigan, north
                and south of a line running due west from Pentwater,
                Michigan.
                1.  Adopted maximum temperatures, after mixing, for
                    the southern zone were Identical to the Conference
                    recommendation.  Maximum temperature standards for
                    the northern zone are 5°F lower than Conference
                    recommendations for all months except June and
                    November.  In those two months the maximum allowable
                    temperatures are the same for both the north and
                    south portions.
                2,  Michigan's mixing zone provision does not specify
                    maximum distance or configurations.  Michigan's mixing
                    zones are to be established on a case-by-case basis
                    and designed to minimize effects on the aquatic biota

-------
                 -5-
    and to permit fish migration at all  times.   The
    Conference had recommended that the  criteria be
    met outside a 1,000 foot radius from a fixed point
    adjacent to the discharge.
3.   Michigan's general provision regarding water Intake
    and discharge design criteria are excerpts  from the
    Conference recommendations.   The Conference require-
    ments that thermal plumes not touch  the Lake bottom
    or affect fish spawning and nursery  areas and that
    intakes not be influenced by warmer  discharge waters
    are not contained in Michigan's standards.
4.   Michigan's standard does not contain time schedules
    for waste heat discharges covered by the above
    criteria and general provisions.  The Conference
    recommendations establish dates for  dischargers 1n
    operation to complete facilities to  meet the criteria
    and general provisions.
5.   The State's revised temperature standards do not
    contain monitoring requirements for  waste heat dis-
    charges greater than 1/2 billion BTU/hour.
6.   With regard to the specific recommendations applicable
    to waste heat discharges 1n excess of 1/2 billion
    BTU/hour:
    1.  Michigan's standard restricts cooling water
        discharges to the amount essential for blowdown
        of a closed cycle cooling facility as recommended
        by the Conference.

-------
                            -6-
               2.   Michigan's  closed cycle  cooling  requirement
                   applies  to  heated discharges  1n  excess  of  1/2
                   billion  BTU/hour which start  construction
                   between  September 1,  1971  and March  1,  1975.
                   The Conference recommendations require  all new
                   waste heat  discharges in excess  of 1/2  billion
                   BTU/hour placed in operation  after March 1,  1971,
                   to provide  closed cycle  cooling  systems.
ILLINOIS;   On June 9, 1971, the  Illinois Pollution  Control Board
           (IPCB), amended  water quality standards  applicable to
           Lake Michigan, particularly the  thermal  portion.   On
           March 7, 1972, the  IPCB reprinted  Water  Pollution
           Regulations of Illinois with  some  revisions.  Section
           206(e)  of these  regulations applies to Lake  Michigan
           Temperature and  was unchanged from the June,  1971  version.

           With regard to the  general thermal recommendation  of the
           Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference:
           1.  Illinois  amended standard contains  specific
               numerical temperature limitations  identical to those
               recommended  by  the Enforcement Conference.  The
               Illinois standard defines a  mixing zone  similar  to
               that recommended  by the Conference.  The  Illinois and
               Conference mixing zones are  identical  in  area.   However,
               the Illinois standard enables  the  shape  of  the mixing
               zone to be described in any  simple form,  as opposed to

-------
                 -7-
    the Conference requirement which defines a circle
    or a portion of a circle.
2.  The Illinois standard contains general  provisions
    with regard to water Intakes and discharges for
    the protection of aquatic life which provides the
    same protections as the Enforcement Conference
    recommendations.  However, Illinois general pro-
    visions apply only to waste heat discharges from
    sources under construction as of January 1, 1971, but
    not in operation.  The general recommendations of the
    Enforcement Conference apply to all existing and future
    waste heat discharges except municipal  treatment plants
    and vessels,
3.  The Illinois standard does not contain a time schedule
    for the one facility under construction (Z1on) to which
    the above criteria and general standards apply.  Dates
    are established for existing facilities in the Conference
    recommendations.  The Conference criteria and general
    charges would apply to Zion, since it 1s greater than
    1/2 billion BTU/hour.  The Conference recommendation for
    backfitting with closed cycle cooling systems applies to
    Zi on.
4.  The Illinois standards require monitoring of any source
    of heated effluent if specified by the State.  The
    Conference recommendation requires monitoring of all
    waste heat discharges greater than 1/2 billion BTU/hour.

-------
                 -8-
VIHh regard to the specific recommendations:
1.  The Illinois standard will require any source of
    heated effluent in excess of 1/2 billion  BTU/hour
    which is in operation or under construction as of
    January 1, 1971, to backfit with alternative cooling
    devices, unless it is demonstrated to the State by
    the owner or operator of the source of heated
    effluent-that discharges from that source have not
    caused and cannot be reasonably expected  in the
    future to cause significant ecological damage to
    the Lake.   Since the Illinois standards will not
    permit the discharge of waste heat in excess of a
    daily average of .1 billion BTU/hour from any
    source not in operation or under construction as
    of January 1, 1971, the Conference provision for
    waste heat discharges in excess of 1/2 billion
    BTU/hour will not have further application in
    Illinois.
2.  The Illinois standard does not provide dates or a
    typical schedule for completion of backfitting of
    alternative cooling devices.  Should the  heated
    effluent dischargers fail to prove the absence of
    ecological damage by June 1977, backfitting of
    alternative cooling device is to be accomplished
    within-a reasonable time to be determined by the
    State.

-------
                            -9-
INDIANA;   On November 17,  1971,  the  Indiana Stream Pollution
          Control  Board adopted  standards nearly  Identical to
          those contained  1n the Summary of the Conference.
          The differences  are enumerated as follows:
          1.  Existing discharges were  exempted from compliance
              with the requirement that discharge plumes shall
              not  overlap  or Intersect.
          2.  Conference specified plan of Implementation dates
              for  construction of appropriate  facilities whereas
              Indiana does not specify  dates.  The proposed time
              schedule will  evidently be a part of the  Implemen-
              tation plan  now under  development which will be
              submitted to the Stream Pollution Control Board  for
              consideration and  public  hearing by the end of this
              year.
          3.  The  effective date for control  of new waste heat
              discharges greater than 1/2 billion BTU/hour as
              required by  the conference was  March 1, 1971.
              Indiana made that  date "as of the effective date
              of this regulation" which was February 11, 1972.
          4.  The  Conference required a detailed  plant-by-plant
              evaluation of intake design and potential corrective
              measures within six months.  This assessment will be
              completed as part  of the  plan of Implementation  under
              development  by the State.

-------
                              -10-
            5.  The State did not adopt a policy of nonproliferatlon
                of new power plants on Lake Michigan.
WISCONSIN;  On December 8, 1971, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
            Resources adopted Lake Michigan Thermal Standards (NR102.04)
            to become effective February 1, 1972.

            The numerical maximum temperature criteria are Identical
            to those recommended by the Lake Michigan  Enforcement
            Conference, however, the implementation plan varies from
            Conference recommendations in the following aspects:
            1.  Mixing zones are to be established by  the State
                following two-year studies of the environmental
                impact of thermal discharges exceeding 1/2 billion
                BTU per hour.   The Conference had recommended a
                maximum mixing zone of 1,000 foot radius for all
                cases.  The 3°F maximum temperature requirement 1n
                Wisconsin standards was not referenced to natural
                temperatures as recommended by the Conference.
            2.  Unless the two-year study results  prove damage,
                Kewaunee and Point Beach nuclear power plants will
                be allowed to operate with once-through cooling
                contrary to Conference recommendations.
            3.  Conference requirements relative to intake and
                discharge design criteria are not  present in the
                Wisconsin implementation plan.

-------
                                -11-
               4.  The Milwaukee Harbor, Port Washington Harbor, and
                   the mouth of the Fox River are excepted from the
                   monthly temperature maximums.
Status of Compliance with Conference Recommendations
     In order to achieve the conferees' objective of protection of the
Lake, 1t Is mandatory to maintain a detailed status of compliance on
the established requirements.  EPA has attempted to compile detailed
status of compliance Information on all dischargers covered by thermal
pollution control requirements as adopted by the conferees.  This
information was furnished by the individual States.  This Information
1s presented by the attached Tables I-IV.
     Rather than discuss these tables at this time, 1t may be more
appropriate to wait until after the individual States' presentations.
Federal Administration Actions
     Certain Federal administration procedures must be followed and
permits received 1n order for a power plant to legally operate.  These
procedures may include permits from the Corps of Engineers and the Atomic
Energy Commission.
Corps of Engineers.  All power plants except the Bailly Nuclear Generating
Facility have applied for and received Section 10 permits relating to
construction of intake and outfall facilities in Lake Michigan.
     The Refuse Act Permit Program, administered by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, requires all
dischargers of Industrial waste water to obtain permits which specify
permissible waste loadings.   This program as such applies to all thermal
dischargers covered by the Conference recommendations in question.  All

-------
                                -12-
major power plant dischargers under consideration by this Conference have
applied for permits.
     As a result of a court decision, discharge permits are not being
Issued by the Corps of Engineers at the present time.  However, EPA 1s
working with the States to complete the processing of applications so
that permits, with suitable conditions, will be ready when they may once
more be issued.  This overall program has provided a great quantity of
valuable data, which is now contributing to many Lake Michigan Enforce-
ment Conference Reports.
Atomic Energy Commission.  The Atomic Energy Commission has established
detailed procedures that must be followed by applicants for nuclear
power plant operating and construction licenses,
     Table V summarizes these steps and depicts the status of the
facilities located on the Lake Michigan shore,
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
     The provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
require the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements.  These
Statements are detailed analyses of environmental effects of proposed
action which all Federal Agencies are required to prepare and use 1n
their agency review processes before they take any "major actions"
(including recommendations and reports on legislation) which "signifi-
cantly affect the quality of the human environment."
     The Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines require that each
statement be prepared in two states;  first, the sponsoring agency
prepares a draft statement using its own expertise and information.
The draft is then reviewed and commented on by other agencies which have
special expertise relating to the project.   Finally, the sponsoring

-------
                                -13-
agency uses these comments to modify the project plans  (1f necessary)
and to preapre a final statement.
     The agency preparing the draft statement 1s responsible for making
1t available to the public.   Any Individual  or organization may then
comment on the draft; he may express support or opposition, suggest
alternatives, or point out project effects  that may have escaped the
attention of Its sponsors.  These  comments  may be in the form of a
letter, a critique, or even, as done by some citizen's  groups, a
"counter environmental Impact statement" setting forth  their views and
analysis in as great a depth as the draft itself.
     The final Environmental Impact Statement represents the Federal
Agency's official position and actions taken subsequent to Its prepara-
tion - relative to the project in  question  - must be compatible with  the
findings and recommendations contained therein.
     Environmental Impact Statements are required on all of the major
power plants planned or under construction  on Lake Michigan.  The state-
ments are being prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission.
Judicial Proceedings
     In addition to the administrative proceedings relating to these
plants, there have been a number of judicial proceedings Involving the
Lake Michigan power plants and the thermal  question.  Some lawsuits have
sprung from the administrative and regulatory hearings  and others have
been based upon independent grounds.  All lawsuits to date, that Involve
the thermal issue either directly  or indirectly, deal with the construction
or operation of a nuclear power plant.  The following plants have been,  or
are presently,involved in litigation:

-------
                            -14-
 I.  Z1on Nuclear Plants 1 & 2 - Z1on, Illinois
     1.  Businessmen for the Public Interest (BPI)  v United States
         Atomic Energy Commission (USAEC)
         Suit filed:  July 14. 1972
         Court;  U.S.  District Court,Northern District of Illinois
         Status:  Pending
     2.  Robert Johnston & U.A.W. v Commonwealth Edison Company
         Suit filed:  October 1969
         Court:  Cook  County Illinois  Circuit Court
         Status:  Pending
     3.  Metropolitan  Sanitary District of Greater  Chicago (MSD)  v
         Commonwealth  Edison Company
         Suit filed:  September 27, 1969
         Court;  Cook  County Illinois  Circuit Court
         Status:  Suit withdrawn on July 24, 1972
II.  Cook Nuclear Plants 1 $ 2 - Bridgeman, Michigan
     1.  BPI v USAEC
         Suit filed:  July 14, 1972
         Court:  U.S.  District Court,  Northern District of Illinois
         Status:  Pending
     2.  Indiana & Michigan Electric Company v William Ruckelshaus,
         Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA)
         Suit filed:  July 20, 1971
         Court:  U.S.  District Court,  District of Columbia
         Status:  Case dismissed

-------
                                -15-
         3.  MacDonald v Indiana-Michigan Power Company
             Suit filed:  March, 1970
             Court:  Federal District Court, Kalamazoo, Michigan
             Status:  Pending
   III,  Kewaunee Nuclear Plant - Kewaunee, Wisconsin
         1.  BPI v USAEC
             Suit filed:  July 14, 1972
             Court:  U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
             Status:  Pending
    IV.  Point Beach Nuclear Plant 2 - Two Rivers, Wisconsin
         1.  BPI, the Sierra Club, and Protect Our Wisconsin
             Environmental Resources v USAEC
             Suit filed:  June 20, 1972
             Court:  U.S. Court of Appeals - 7th Circuit, Chicago, 111.
             Status:  Temporary restraining order granted, later
                      dissolved.  Preliminary injunction denied.
Arqonne National Laboratory Report
     Earlier in my statement I mentioned the extensive testimony that
has been presented to the conferees on the thermal question on Lake
Michigan.  Since the March 1971 conference, additional work has been
completed on the Lake and elsewhere that bears on the question before
you.  For that reason, EPA entered into a contract with the Argonne
National Laboratory for a review of any new technical information
relevant to the environmental effects of thermal discharges into Lake
Michigan, which is not reflected 1n the existing record of the Lake
Michigan Enforcement Conference.

-------
                                -16-
     Attached 1s a copy of that completed report.  Let me spend a minute
summarizing Its contents.
     The primary sources of Information for the report Included hearing
testimony from local, state and Federal pollution control agencies,
reports from the Great Lakes Fisheries Laboratory of the U.S.  Bureau of
Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, universities performing research on Lake
Michigan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits, technical and environ-
mental reports prepared by orjfor power companies discharging Into Lake
Michigan and environmental impact statements prepared by the Atomic
Energy Commission,  Results from studies conducted on bodies of water
other than Lake Michigan and reports from the open literature were cited
1f they were judged to be particularly relevant and as time permitted.
     The report discusses the physical and biological aspects of thermal
discharges.  A section on Ambient Lake Conditions describes preoperatlonal
field studies, thermal bar measurements and general lakewlde phenomena
that are pertinent to power plant siting considerations.  A section on
Studies Related to Thermal Plumes describes field measurements of the
physical and biological characteristics of thermal discharges, summarizes
mathematical modeling techniques, and describes some laboratory tests on
the biological effects of heated water.  An Intake and Discharge Effects
Section summarizes operational data from most of the power plants on Lake
Michigan, describes the intake and outfall designs of the five major nuclear
facilities sited on the lake, and discusses biological effects observed at
various power plants.
     The report also discusses alternative cooling systems.  A section on
Cooling Towers, Ponds and Spray Canals describes several analyses of closed

-------
                                -17-
cycle cooling systems as reported in some of the Environmental  Impact
Statements and summarizes available data on estimated costs of  original
installations and backfitting.  Chemical discharges  from both fossil
fired and nuclear power plants are tabulated in the  section on  Chemical
Inputs.  This section also describes chemicals  used  in condensers, process
water systems, cooling towers and ponds and reports  on recent experiments
to study the biological effects of various concentrations of these
chemicals.
Environmental Protection Agency Thermal Policy
     The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in the process  of
establishing nation-wide effluent guidelines for the Refuse Act Permit
Program , has reviewed large quantities of data on the effects  of cooling
water discharges on the aquatic environment.  From the beginning It has
been recognized that the effects of cooling water discharges are dependent
on many factors in addition to that of temperature increase. These factors
include such variables as intake and outfall, location and design, quality
of the cooling water supply and receiving waters, biological importance
of the effected area, chemical discharges associated with plant operation,
etc.
     It became obvious that a single effluent requirement for the entire
nation was neither feasible nor desirable.  For this reason, EPA has
established the policy that all discharges to the aquatic environment
involving waste heat must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking
into account that some discharges must be evaluated collectively due to
their combined impact on the receiving water.

-------
                                -IB-
     Attached are copies of EPA's Thermal Policy as stated by
Mr. John Quarles, Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and General
Counsel, on May 12, 1972,  Also attached 1s a speech by Mr, Quarl >s
that relates to this subject.
     To determine the Impact of this policy on Thermal discharges to
Lake Michigan, one must conduct a thorough assessment of each major
heat source individually and collectively due to any combined Impacts
that may occur.
     Mr. Chairman, that concludes my statement.   I will be happy to
answer any questions now or we can move into the statements by the
respective States.

-------



CHI

v»
O
ft
ID
Q.



























t/>

0
CJ

H
s -
o
0
UJ
c^

* UJ
j ^r
j u
?r^
LU


o
^
p


UJ


s
c

o


_"D
S
£


















\ oi a
1 L **» ft •
i~ ru o i- i— irt
i > M- rtj ni at
;r -r- c _j u CM
r-* O '- I*
• o -I- y. r\>  .e c:
»-* u. ru r; i— o
1 Or—
v» (Ur-
al- ftf
0 i.
cu o-*^- w»
fc * CJ O fll
• >tC n)
f-t t, O -M
»-« rO -r- C
»—«(/) 4-» t-4
*+-
O •—
cvo c a*
o s_ o> c •
3Vr-  »o O
aj a: -M s. s-
in cr 
P-( O f) T- *t-
l-H 0 ^J C -^
o
tn u
n> • JT
'^ O ^-s.
O CJ CO
4J cn
- I- C
c: rtj o
0 -C -r-
rt c> r—
.*" r~
a? Q 03
-
o
J
Ci : S-


ro O t/>
u n. u 0)
o ra

-0 nj- 0 0
r;
£ C
O
1— CJ •!-

**z s- fa
1 J - O
U —J
C"  n n
c
^
(tj
C 0)
O J«f (Q
•r- (T5 -r-
J-> -'J S-
j2 .5 -S
 . i_
U CM (J
O —
"o X
(T3 C C/l
•r- (0
(U O. C
*-> g 0
•f- CJ Psl
^_ f.

• C






UJ

o
o

State does not specifically prohibit new power plants
g
Michigan. Requirement for closed cycle cooling on ne
does not apply to those already under construction.






STATE DID NOT COMPLY






c


o c
z a


-§•
5 = . Z3 S . .
X 3 SE









- .2 _ £
•f *l ~ ~ <
z § z






(U O)
1 I
* s = s «
*• «
o o

O
OQ


f c c c c
O O O O O
Q) 4-J CJ 4-1 <1J 4^ QJ 4J Q} 4^
C i— •  OS" .11
C !- J- s- t. 1. c
Z3 CL CV Q_ o_ Q- ZD






o IE
dee z s r c:
c c
=
^
= " e
o c c c c 5
C .2 c c§ .2 ° 5
10 OI-M O Of— OJ-4-) OJ4-> ro
T- fOOfO CO IO "o -I- 'o *r~

O S* O O Q> O ^ l/l ^
O 1- -i- -r-
f— 4-» U C M C
a. 4-> c 3 o " aj
o c-— « E *> r-  U 3 OJ 00 0) d) COtO Q.3
iu t. -r-o i- h» c«r 30 >>o a.
OJU> l/lr— O*O 4JroO O OJO3 V)
C g CO Of C*) r-~ c f P^ 4^ *f r^" CM *•« C
S|5 3 S £ £ S SS
-S O Oj (j
*-* !E ••-
-O ^ ^
on Lake
w plants












u
c


i
o

c
t £
•^









« „

















c c
.° °
QJ +j o £
ra o ra o



a. a. . . ._







K ft



f^
C
o c
OJ4J §
i— a i—
«o 3

as- ai
a. i/>


l-
m
—^ 0)

<0 *^ 3 '*"'*

°~ in oj c S

lOCNJ c +J O
•r-01 3 rO^J*
3 £
^U ^£
3

-------

CM
*»»
o

CNJ

O i+- fa fi ni
i- -r- r _i i_ i »
f— O 1~ S--


M-I ci. in :' £-- i)
I
1 O f—
01 
• >-, C ".0
M tu 0 4-*
t~i ITJ ••- c:
O *--
i r**
QJ *O C (Jl
i— OJ -r- r—
u v- rnc -
>>-r- (I) O r-
t_> 3 CO ••—
O" 4-* JC
T!) QJ 
i— i O ^4 C et











c
r
t-
-C
u
CO
o
•o
4-
c"
a:


r—


I
CT
C

fc.
O
4-
C
L_l
•o
C
n3
C
0
4J

4J
 cn
•r- f- C
C 03 O
^5 x; •*-
tn o ca
.o
" ^
• c?
f— CJ trt
' - 0 Q>
_ OJ Ol
t— « 2S C
ID
^Ti' O O


c
o
d) *r-
t — ' +J

a O
.-: o
Ul

!5 -
3

o cu





 c






p-»
UJ
o
a;

rn
CJ
1/1




State does not specifically prohibit new power plants on Lake
Michigan. Requirement for closed cycle cooling on new plants
does not apply to those already under construction.








STATE DID NOT COMPLY

















 -«

O. ^ ,






C
X

C Jt
c
ra


<- £
c o
O v-
«)X> £
S ™ 0
ID 0 -i-

IX Z
^ I
-J C

C IB
IO i~^_^ u

*-* 1. QJ 5 **"*

C O +J_ i- £
O O- ItJ^ c
(_) X^ « W

E J> •§! »- *J
•-" C , LU O C
co o • id
•z o o > —
O VI O| <-> Q.
5

-------


































o
I—

en
§


o
o
LU


Li
LiJ
c:
La


O
o

re
l—

—
u
;_;
O
<-J
O

*£
f-
ff:
to



















i nj o
c n» i » k_ *-- i/i
~ £ § ^J t L'

£-« iu m . - i - d
i
i » ) *•-
iA  O , C 10
>-• i_ o -M
0 , K
0) *O El Ol
f— Q* •»- •—
u i- en c -
>>..- (U 0 •—
(_) 3 £Q >r_
cr +-> -C
*O (U I/I ID U
G> d +-> V- ^
(/> C til fO
o en 03 o. S
»— C r~ O
o-i- a. t.
r- CD (U
^ o ,. c: -M
»-« t_> n: c r<










V)
o
t- *
c o *^.
0 QJCQ
•M 01
•~ S- C
c m o
-IE
in a on
5
(O

c : <^
tr
t-
re

\f\

0

T
Q
4-*
C




c£

1

cr
c:
c

c
c
c
0
•T~

H-l
1 2
O (/>
i — 0) in
O- O Q)

ra
• M- -C
«* O 0


c
0
OJ-r-
r.i-tJ
!- 10
n3 LI
-!- O
O — J
(/I
•,- 0)
Q C
n •.

^ IB
IB -r-
tl 01
"^ 't-

r\j u
i
X

-t
s o
(U Nl
C3>
• C
p™ •*•




(V
LU
ct:
g



m

State requires closed cycle cooling for all heated
discharges >0.1 billion BTU/hr which were not in
operation or under construction as of January 1, 1971.





State did not furnish



V
U
m
•i~


E






z z =






Implementation schedule.
















i

1 III





to
c
s
r 3

o




t*4
I— •

c o

3 0) •*->
»— t— TO C
o .a.— S
<_j moo
So =» -«
t. c
co a. r>

t
w •
!o c
O .^ a
J- c
a. Z3


i 1
1 e *>
S o m
S"~ ** "o
" C
f~ •*
ft) O
10 > K

1 i I
O i"~
«n a.^_^ *» k

^ t flj « oj IE OJ
LU (t)3 r- 3 OS
OS Q. E O. Z
 r— U C\J

W C O 3 C
IP . .








i t








C
0

(U 4**


 O **- O *
OCX. 3 r—
IO Or— «
I «C .f»
*— PO XI *—
01 CT t  &
4-»-r- 1- O ^ *
t/)^- OJ A Wl

• o 
-------


CM
t-
O

"
0)
o>
(O
CL

























to

c
1

&J
^
o
fc* t-U
UJ
UJ <— )
-J Z£
CQ L
? • S.. 4 » tfl -tl -C"
•-« fi, ni ^' r— O
I
Q) t-^O
0 J..
»U O-'»- Ul
^ t_> o o;
• >, c na
»-« V- Q 4-»
•-• n» •.- C
O I—
i r-
CJT) C O\
r_ til -r- r—
u i- cn C *
>Vr- QJ O i—
O ^l CQ -r-
CT 4-» JC

tu cr: 4-j i- u
t/) C OJ at
O 01 rtj Q.S

i— Cft OJ
^ 0 g C 4->
*™* t_> '-* C «X











U)
C)
£
J
c
V)
o

c
(—
c


r—
^

1

t*
C
c

c
£"
•o
c
fd

c
0

fi.
4->
r")
fc
p
TC
OJ
4-»

L.

^
6
CT • JC
C 0^
O 
W» 3
O C= O Z C O
U- O 4-> 1 O *-*
O +•* "T3 r— 4-^ "O r-~
4-> t. O) 0 t- O) U
^— O QJ >•» O * ^*
•"•^ *^v. -^-^ o) cn "-*«. •*-**
= z: = «t «c sc a=





1 § 1
c c f s as t
§ § ^ 	






(U flj o> u
C c. C C
£ a s a
4j *J * C C *> **
i ^ S S £ S
5

i— * f. ••—
c c "" c o "£
O O C £ O S- fO

ft) 4J QJ 4-> ^ r-~ 4-*
i — (O r— co r— ^-^ O O C C
^1 f™ * -Q r— Q Q *O S O E
£*>r- JD-e-~ d. OJ r— C O C
o >• DT» QJ -«-> ex. rz> cj JC

CX a. t/i y t— • •^•>








i * t
So o
c c £ e c fi c
c c "c
=3 =3 =>

1 i II
o 4) +•* §   i- o
>• CL. to Ou Ob.
c
O /t) t_ *O
t"



w *o Q) c u_ ^ oj :n
*~ E" ^^ *° •c-^.°11 ^^-^.^

LkJ QJ (tJ , 4-> QJ •*->  t_J  C U «*•» — VOVO ^-CsJCTCi C
ElOGJ> .C !_ QJ nj ^ *»- i— 1 >r-
^i E CO 4-> OJ O CO JE t» ^Ti U.
«=tE S-LO QJ^I (U
§ 3 sr sr «
»— <

-------
  o

 CM
        .£ T- r _j u
          i-O    S- L.
         • o ••- -* a) '".1

        •-« n. 
                        State does not  prohibit new power plants.   Require-ent of  closed-
                        cycle cooling has  been established for all new  plants.
                        State did not meet  deadline, but  has forwarded  a partial list^
          0 -    K
        (U TJ C   G\
        r~  C  •
        >>-r- O O r—
        O ^ CO -r-
          •f- O.   fc.
          •—   rn 
          O "» -^ ^;
Ul LU

I
          — 
-------

CM
*>
O
*—
1
a.























to
0
>— t
t—
Q
UJ
^;-
O
' tt
1 (j
' ?"
LU
UJ


C



h-
1— «
S
UJ
o

^5
cu
o
o

o

1/1


t—































1 fl) - 1
C (li O S- r- i/>
tJ It- Hi (it  J- (O
u u
;~ o o a."
* >> C al
•-« t?0 -M
£ S'£»5
O r-
t r*»

O J. 0> C *"»
>,-r- (U O r-
(J 3 CO -P-
CT +-* .C
"U 1) t/> fO O
tn c oj 
C
C
•a

n
c
o

•^

c
r
o
E

*
ro

4->
*r*
0
•^
6
\f> k
O  Ol
i- t- C
c nj o
O J=v-
^ U i —
^ 5 S
o
+J
•3 >i
: i_
; w
n m
r* (U l/l
n. o 01
U 
o u
t- «3

*4-» r—


^— 21 l
UJ • O
,W! (_J
c o ***
w o Q; l-
CT o 3 (V
"£ . s 8
u u o o.
1- 4J O
E T> C CM 
1 1— ID CXJ t.

e c co. E
«r n» •! o 3
IB t- Ol O in
•-i T) Ol C
ac c o
o •-• u
X
i
"8
wi
o
o
O)
oi'o


C31 ^. C c • B
^ Z







= r s I
^ z





41
c

V fi ~ s c
O O
0 2=




C C




o JD — 5 jo i— E
OroOO *^ o ^> »-rf
Ol i- C i- C
UO Ci. => Ck- ^>







E C
J§ o
-Q C = • •

o a. =>




_0 0 «-

= I — IO I — IO r—
10 O t •*- O t-
XI -i- I/I -r- ^
£00
Q- Q. 2
C ^
*o c
r— *J 03 O 4-» T?
0. C P— -r- C C


« 0. *-> L- =5 Ck, 4->
«; c « a. ^-

U r— t— i— «*- C — ^. ^_ 4^
3 •*-» QJ- — • D_ x-^ u O 3 QJ _J C
S• S >• r— Of
QJ ra o ^^ E TO a> ir> T— • y
TJOOO t->p— U O ^3 • tJ O A)
roo m . r— o in ca ao 


p— cnc^E fc-oi-i
(O • • •»- roL.ro & X *>
a. o co CD f— o o > o co

ac •—

-------
  o
 CO
         1  O.—
         t/l 'U »—
         Q> S- lO
        U i- U> C  *
        "  r^ OJ O *—
            CQ •r-
        CJ
           rj-     _
        *O d> *n nj U1
        QJ Cd 4 -> S- fc-

        a o>)5 o-a?
        *~ C i— O
        CJ T* O_   fc.
          r—   Ol  CO
          4J en
          •r- V- C
          C (O O

          • ~ u r~
            l/J r—

          Ln Q O3
          r—  D._
                           Stats  requires closed- cycle  cooling systems on all  new waste
                           heat sources  which start construction between September 1»  1971
                           and March  1,  1975.  No permanent non-proliferation  statement was
                           adapted.
                           State did not  comply.
          X
          s: o>
          aS
          §5
                                  o
                                  f"
                                  m
                              5
                   g
                   <_>

-------
^
LU
               .*^f


o>
u
+J
o
z:
•o
Q)
13
l/l
I/I
O
LLj

1

CVJ
CV]

10

0
U C
C OJ

M- -1- i-
O 4-»
(O
C t-
*4JO
ro
i_ :>,
OJ 4-»
•O*i-

o ^3
O l-i_

4- 4-
o o
0
0.
«f-
o

u =

4-> LT
_0 C
TD (O
C Q>
fO 31









i/)
QJ 1—
cu o> i/i o cu
L) O C 4- U
•i- C QJ ••-
0 ^ •*- •«-» 0
^ U) _J -i- 2T
= \ft C. -
H-» cn 13
QJ I*- .,_ S_ OJ
3 O 4-> O Z3
t/| fO Q. U>
VI C t- CL 07
•r- O (U O T-
•t— Q.
tJ -*-1 O **~ *-3
LU  CU
1 "O •«— (J = 1

CM t/J -r- 4J Cfl CM
r-*. c u o c P-.
I o *o m ••— '
O O U_ S- CM
n -o ra CM
1 M- *4- C QJ 1

Ul
QJ V-
OJ (/I c*
c: QJ
ra u :>>

ui C
»-t cn 3
c +->
0 4J O
(0 CL
C S- Q.
0 QJ O
•r- O.
4-> O 4-
m o
i- >>
QJ -M 0)
T3 -r- 1-

l/J -r- -M
c u o
3i2z

M- **- c
0 0 <0

OJ
u
o

=
-o
tfl
o
LiJ

3

cn r--
c: i
'r- 0%
i- CM
03 1
QJ CM
31 i—

t-
o
<4- 1
C £
O Q-
*4J
(TJ S
L) -
•r- 4-»
Ou E
O- t
<: QJ
a.
c
o c:
o
cn-r-
C JJ
•r- (J
15
C
4- O
O (-3


o>
^
-D
^




c
•r-
U CM
t/l h-
cn
S
c
£
*
c
o
CJ

0>
c
T

Ol
JC
*
UD
S.
5
E
01



O
cn
c
"£
1





Sz





























-g

•li'




s—
CM
-s.
1
§

-•*
CM
^r«
tOO

r-
CM
ft
.
o f-
CM r-
1JS CO


vn
to
2
«
«T
CM
«*>
CM
•«^


CM
U>
S- ^

J i
\J Hj
z to
fc
£ p
/O 4J fQ
Wl C S


PL.















0 -
\n 0
^1 "^
S 0>
*--. to
S jo
5 5
CO GO to
0^" CM
^.^ pj.
O>CM CM
^" to
to to
5 S
i*. «>
C — s

j_t-J ^' 'o
iO tf O 3
— * Q) Q) O S*f
S* T> § K QJ
tJ 3 O O QJ


O C O *X3 *O
c3 Q <_3 r>q ^
•r- v— 01
M =2





























g

O CJ

j-» to e



CM Q)
^ ea.
--i* O
CO •*•*
OJ
CO
OJ
1
T— CM
i^
CM
^
CM
U)
1
^- OJ
2"o?
•^» -^.
OJ ft
cn
CO
ro
CO
CM
***
S

r\j
«o


C-
CD
m
 •
•(-» C V)


O OL. —
0.































1



a,


-------
          \
               UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                WASHINGTON, o.c.  20450

                                     May 12, 1972
Office of the
General Counsel


       MEMORANDUM

       TO     $  All Regional Administrators

       FROM   ;  Assistant Administrator for Enforcement
                  and General Counsel

       SUBJECT?  Policy on Thermal Effluent


            Until further notice, the following will be the policy of the permit
       program with respect to processing of permits for major sources of waste
       heat discharge.  It is understood, of course, that by reason of the
       district court injunction in Kalur v. Resor. no permit may be actually
       Issued at the present time.

            It is the policy of the Environmental Protection Agency that all
       discharges to the aquatic environment involving waste heat be evaluated
       on a case-by-case basis, taking into accouat  that some discharges must be
       evaluated collectively because of their related" impact on a -receiving
       water.  Such evaluations should include a  comprehensive analysis of  all
       relevant factors at the site, such as water quality standards, total cumu-
       lative heat loading, current biotic impact information', scouring and other
       velocity effects, entrainment damage, associate chemicals, and alternative
       cooling'and pollution abatement devices and processes,

            Where the evidence indicates that once-through cooling will damage
       the aquatic environment, plants currently  operating or under construction
       should be permitted to  operate, but with a commitment  to offstream cooling
       (provided that the environmental impact of the offstream cooling technique
       adopted is acceptable).  In circumstances  of  substantial environmental
       Impact, the backfitting may have to be done under an implementation  sched-
       ule that requires reduced heat discharge aad  restricted operating levels
       during  times of peak environmental stress.  Where  the  discharger has
       demonstrated that there is no substantial evidence of  damage  from once-
       through cooling, the plant should receive a permit to  operate, but with a
       commitment to perform  environmental monitoring and to  go to offstream
       cooling If this monitoring produces evidence  of  substantial damage.

            The test for new plants will be stricter, however,- because here there
       is an opportunity for very substantial reduction  in  the cost  of cooling or

-------
other treatment.  In new plant construction industry can optimize  environ-
mental protection by giving early consideration to  the  constraints imposed
by environmental regulations at a markedly lover cost than that  incurred
by backfitting.  All electric power companies  contemplating future Con-
struction should be on notice by now of the need for thermal pollution
control,  (If water quality standards will be  violated  by  the  effluent,
appropriate treatment is obviously necessary.)  Should  a company proceed
with design and construction of a new plant without adequate consideration
of attendant thermal problems, it must be assumed to have  deliberately
incurred the risks of increased costs of backfitting and of potentially
not being permitted to operate during the
     It is essential that any inquiry from a utility company concerning
the degree of control required for a new plant be promptly and clearly
answered, in writing,  We must establish a clear record of our position
for each new plant.  Attached is an example of a response which,  although
dealing with a plant under construction, addresses this general issue,

     You should, of course, have your staffs available to provide such
information as is needed by potential waste heat dischargers in order.
that they may properly design the necessary pollution control equipment
at the outset.  As questions arise on technical and other problems affect-
ing the position which this Agency should take concerning thermal effluent
from new plants, I urge that you notify and work with Drf Cordon Everett
and his staff in the Office of Technical Analysis,
                                     jhn R.  Quarles, Jr,

Enclosure
                                   fyoh

-------
the
electrical
power  industry
and  the
environment
 Address by
 John R. Quarles, Jr.
 Assistant Administrator for
 Enforcement and General Counsel
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Washington, D.C.
 to the                _  LAU
 Edison Electric Institute's Eighth
 Biennial Financial Conference
 Miami, Fla.
 May 16,1972
  I am happy to be with yon to discuss some
problems which are  of  great importance  to
your industry, to the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and to the average  American
citizen.  The  electrical power industry, as one
of the largest and most broadly spread industries
in the United States, is being, and will continue
to be,  affected by any strategy to alleviate ex-
isting pollution problems and to preserve the
quality  of the environment for future genera-
tions. Since environmental regulations will im-
pose additional burdens on the power industry,
we need both your  understanding  and  your
affirmative cooperation.
  The United States today faces a severe en-
vironmental challenge. In many areas the past has
caught up with us. But we are a diverse people
in a vast land and have enjoyed both spectacular
and unique economic growth. Thus, if problems
spring from our diversity and from the rate at
which  we have made economic progress, it
should surprise none of us.
  There is no doubt  that electrical power has
been  the backbone of our ability to provide
continually  rising standards-of-living for  our
citizens in this century. We have, however, paid
a high price for our affluence. Resource toler-
ances  have been exceeded—our air  is dirty—
our rivers are polluted. Since the passage of the
National Environmental Policy Act in 1969, we
have come  a long way in initiating efforts to
protect the environment, but we have a long
way to go.  EPA has set standards and has
buttressed them with vigorous enforcement. Such
measures taken to protect the environment, as
we all know, involve not only ecology, but also
economics.
                                                    We are aware that the electrical industry is
                                                  faced with grave difficulties in the next several
                                                  decades.  We are attempting to be responsive.
                                                  Your task  of supplying adequate and clean
                                                  energy in the coming decades  is enormous. As
                                                  a matter of fact, it is second only to ours, for

-------
the only  items consumed  more  widely  than
power in this country are air and water.

   Relationships between my agency and  your
industry are not always harmonious and cordial.
They are, indeed, inherently subject to incidents
of confrontation. In the absence of strong en-
vironmental regulations, many have not  been
responsible in their use of natural  resources in
the past. The cumulative damage has been  great
and further abuse no  longer can  be tolerated.
In cases where damage to the environment has
occurred, EPA has been tough.
   A foremost example is our enforcement action
against the Florida Power and Light Co.  con-
cerning its plant at Turkey Point  near Home-
stead. We estimate that  the  Federal Govern-
ment has spent between $1 and $2 million and
at one time had as many as 60 persons working
on that case, which was in litigation for a year
and a half before being settled last September.
The abatement program approved by the Court
requires  company expenditures of  roughly $35
million to mitigate environmental damage, though
such damage even  then will not be completely
eliminated.  We are presently in  litigation  with
the Houston Lighting  and Power  Co. over its
plans to divert  huge amounts of grossly-polluted
water from the  Houston Ship Channel and dis-
charge them into Trinity Bay after using the
water for cooling  purposes. We  also recently
became engaged in litigation with the Delmarva
Power and Light Co. under the Clean Air Act
as a result of that company's refusal to comply
with  fuel content regulations of the  Delaware
Federal-State air implementation  plan. These
are only a few examples of the clash between
power generation and environmental protection.
In cases  where our best professional judgment
is that a company has disregarded environmental
requirements,  we  intend  to  fight  with  every
resource  at our command to  prevent environ-
mental damage. We will continue to be  tough
until an environmental ethic pervades every deci-
sion made by industry in this country.
   The normal operation of a power plant can
 generate both air and water pollution. Emission
 of paniculate matter, sulfur dioxides, nitrogen
 oxides and some of  the trace metals into the
 air must be controlled. Some of the polluting
 emissions can be brought down to levels com-
 patible with Federal standards through  conver-
 sion to different fuel sources. Others will require
 installation  of pollution control equipment such
 as electrostatic precipitators, wet scrubbers and
 bag houses. The removal of sulfur dioxide is a
 more  difficult  problem  and is specifically ad-
 dressed by  the New Source Performance Stand-
 ards promulgated by EPA this year. It has been
 estimated that 150 million metric tons of sulfur
 dioxides are emitted to the global  atmosphere
 each year, 70 percent of which is directly attrib-
 utable to the combustion of coal.

   Thermal  pollution is also of major concern.
 The return  of large amounts of cooling water
 to the  natural  environment  can  create  a heat-
 load highly  disruptive  or destructive to a fragile
 aquatic  environment.  EPA has  had  thermal
 policy  actively  under consideration  for many
 months. We have recently established the policy
 that each discharge of waste heat to the  aquatic
 environment shall  be  evaluated  on a case-by-
 case basis.  Where our  analysis  indicates that
 once-through cooling,  damages or will damage
 the environment, EPA will  insist on a commit-
 ment to offstream cooling as a prerequisite to
 either  continued  operations  or to EPA concur-
 rence with company investment plans. In other
 cases in which we believe that damage will not
 occur,  but in which there is a clear possibility,
 we shall insist on the establishment of an effec-
 tive monitoring system to detect damage before
 it  becomes serious.
   Design for new plants should incorporate all
features necessary for environmental protection.
Inclusion  of such factors at the planning and
design  stage will markedly lower costs  from the
expensive backfitting process.  We  are putting
the power generating industry on notice of the

-------
need for thermal pollution control. If any com-
pany chooses  to ignore environmental  require-
ments  in its  planning, it will  be deliberately
running the risk of increasing costs due to back-
fitting  and possibly  of not being permitted to
operate during the backfitting. We realize that
the additional costs to your industry of  comply-
ing with these environmental measures will  be
great, but they are reasonable and necessary to
get the job done.
   The costs  of such environmental policy  and
regulations are presently being studied  by both
Government and industry. A recent report esti-
mated  that  total investment  by  the  electric
power  industry  to meet environmental  require-
ments  will be $10.7  billion between 1972  and
1976.  This figure could reach $17.8 billion by
1976 depending on requirements for backfitting.
Furthermore,  these costs  will vary widely from
region to region, and it is estimated that pollu-
tion control costs in 1976 will  range from 2.8
percent to 10.65 percent  of 1970 average rev-
enues.
   Although it is difficult to estimate what im-
pact these additional costs will have on various
classes of consumers, we can derive some "ball-
park"  figures. Assuming that total costs will be
evenly divided  among  all customers (which in
reality they probably will  not be)  and accepting
present usage of electricity as a base, the aver-
age residential consumer  would find his annual
electricity  bill in 1976 from $4.50 to $17.50
higher than it would be  without any  environ-
mental regulation of  the electrical power indus-
try. The cost of electricity to the industrial sector
will also increase. This, however, is not  expected
to have a major impact on consumption of manu-
factured  goods. Only a  few  industries  have
electricity costs equalling more  than a  few per-
centage  points of the value of  their shipments.

   We  now have reached a point where we have
a clearer picture of the economic consequences
of environmental  protection. Though precise
predictions are still difficult, we can draw two
conclusions. One is that  environmental protec-
tion will not be cheap. The second is that the
costs are not  prohibitive.  The  question, there-
fore, is not whether America can afford environ-
mental protection but whether  it wants to. On
the  basis of the  laws passed by Congress,  we
must conclude that the  environmental require-
ments now being imposed are desired and con-
sidered worth the cost by  our society.

   On the other hand, measures  taken to protect
the environment  do not abrogate the responsi-
bility of  fulfilling basic power needs. EPA rec-
ognizes  fully that essential public services must
not  be  disrupted  in pursuit of environmental
protection. Every effort must be made to mini-
mize points of friction and administrative bottle-
necks.

   As one  example, the Atomic Energy Com-
mission  has proposed legislation known as the
"Quad Cities Bill."  This bill would modify the
National Environmental Policy Act on a limited,
temporary  basis to  permit  interim licensing of
nuclear plants before full NEPA review in-cases
of emergency  power shortages.  EPA  has gone
on record  in  favor  of this legislation,  and I
personally  have testified  before three  different
congressional  committees  in its support. This
is  one example of efforts to assist in  achieving
orderly administration of  environmental protec-
tive  regulation  and to  minimize  transitional
problems.

   I  would like now to discuss  this problem in
a broader context. The environmental movement
is, I believe, part  of  a  more fundamental re-
vision of values in  our society. People, young
and old alike, have recognized that our emphasis
on material progress should be  better balanced
with an appreciation of aesthetic and other non-
material  values. While this reorientation affects
social attitudes toward the pollution  problems
of every  industry, it appears to  bear upon your
industry  with  remarkably  strong effect.

-------
  Many citizens have argued with great emotion
that stabilization of  the  growth of power,  or
even a decrease in the use of power, is necessary
if we are to save our environment. The striking
fact is that, in general, this  attitude of opposing
growth in an industry does  not  extend to other
industries,  even though  many other industries
have  severe pollution problems. Why  is it that
to a large  extent the environmental  community
has singled out the electric power  industry as
the target for this type of attack?
  The explanation  may  lie in many" sources.
Part  of the answer,  no  doubt,  is the environ-
mental damage  created by  power plants in the
past,  especially  in  a few notorious  cases. Per-
haps  part  of the answer  is that electric power
has to some, become a  symbol for the entire
system of  industrial development which  con-
cerns  them.  Closely related to  this, of  course,
is the prospect of enormous growth  in the elec-
tric power industry and rapacious  demands on
natural  resource reserves to  fuel the turbines.
   I wish to state my own opinion that the future
vitality of our country demands continued large
growth in the electric power industry.  Electrical
power is necessary  not only to increase stand-
ards  of living, but  also  to  improve the quality
of  life in these  United States. A few examples
quickly make this clear. Widespread construc-
tion  of rapid transit systems  is imperative  to
our mission of alleviating  urban air pollution
and to achieving sound land use in metropolitan
areas. Increasing  amounts of  electricity  also
will be required for additional  waste treatment
plants to  which we are committed;  these  are
critical to our  resolve to revitalize  our rivers.
In  short,  power is the  foundation  of national
economic  growth,  and  such growth is required
to  achieve our  environmental objectives. More-
over, only with  such  growth  can other  vital
 social goals be  realized,  and  in particular, only
 with such growth  can the  promise  of America
 be extended to the millions of  our citizens who
 live close  to, or below, the line of poverty.
   These factors  would seem to indicate indis-
putably the need for  growth in the generation
and the use of electricity.  To  me  they simply
intensify the puzzle of why so many have become
hostile to the power industry. It suggests the de-
velopment of a severe communications problem
within our  society of the proper role of your
industry. May I suggest that in the long run this
problem cannot be solved by one side whining
and the other side losing. There  are fundamental
truths on both sides. There must be an accom-
modation.
   If your industry is  to  recoup its position of
universal respect as the public  service industry
you are, you  must establish a clear and con-
vincing record  of acting with full sensitivity to
the  environmental  concerns which  are now so
prevalent throughout  our  society.   Occasional
cases of  blatant  disregard  for environmental
values have done immense damage  to the posi-
tion of your  industry in our  country.  Those
cases must not  be  repeated.  A far-reaching
concern  for environmental protection—an in-
sistence  on fulfilling  both  the  spirit  and the
letter of legal  requirements—must  be present
in all you do.
   To present this recommendation  in specific
terms, I would like to focus on three pending
problems, each of enormous significance.
   Pursuant  to  Section 111 of the  Clean Air
Act, as amended, EPA promulgated New Source
Performance Standards for fossil-fuel-fired steam
generators on December 23, 1971. These stand-
ards  regulate  emission  of  paniculate matter,
sulfur dioxides and nitrogen  oxides from new
fossil-fuel power  plants.  All new  plants with
generating  units  over  250  million  BTU input
will  be covered.
   The New Source Performance  Standards re-
flect our best  determination  of the degree of
emission limitation  achievable  with  the best
available systems of emission control, and take
into account the  cost  of achieving such reduc-
tion. In setting these standards, EPA examined
power plants in Europe as well as in the United
                                                                               8

-------
States. I realize that some in your industry have
major  problems with these standards and are
presently challenging them  in the  Courts.

  The  setting of  standards is,  in  any case, a
difficult task. The problems encountered are
mainly  technical in nature,  and hard  answers
are not easy to find. In this case, the questions
focus  particularly  on the  technology  of  wet
scrubbers—questions as to their effectiveness,
their dependability and their cost. I cannot dis-
cuss these technical  issues with you today. I
will  say, however, that our determinations in
setting these standards were made only  after an
intensive and responsible  analysis  of the  best
technical advice  we  could  obtain. We  believe
in the new  source standards, and we intend to
enforce them.
   I also wish to emphasize the  essential factors
which bear upon  this problem. We  know that
we must achieve  major reductions in  sulfur
dioxide emissions  from fossil-fuel power plants.
There are only two ways this can be done. One
is to use low-sulfur fuel; but its supply is limited.
The other is to eliminate  the  sulfur before it
leaves the stack.  The only way we can meet
this  problem on  a national basis is to  make
huge strides forward in the utilization of  emis-
sion control technology. This must be your goal.
   A second area of major interest to your indus-
try and EPA is the pending water  legislation.
Bills  to overhaul  the Federal  Water Pollution
Control Act have been passed by the Senate
and by the  House of Representatives. One pro-
vision of the House bill has special importance
to your industry.  Section  316  would  exempt
thermal discharges from the standard regulatory
structure  applicable to other pollutants, which
in general requires achievement of the best prac-
ticable control technology by January 1,  1976.
I am  aware of the special complexities  in the
thermal pollution problem, some of which per-
haps might justify distinct  statutory treatment.
At this time our Agency has taken no position
on the merits of this provision.  There is one
facet of the problem,  however, on which the
merits are  clear.  The  language of the House
bill  has  raised some question, at least in the
minds of its opponents, that it is  intended  to
exempt thermal discharges from all Government
control whatsoever  until  new  regulations are
promulgated approximately one year and four
months after enactment of the law.  You should
be aware that this proposed special  treatment
of thermal discharges is being bitterly denounced
among environmentalists. The scope of the con-
troversy and its emotional level could be reduced
if it were  made unequivocally clear that thermal
discharges would continue to be subject to the
present regulatory requirements until  the new
regulations are issued. It is  highly in the interests
of your  industry to take  the lead hi making
this clear  and to make certain that the statutory
language leaves no doubt on this point.
   Lastly, it is often much easier to avoid major
environmental problems than to find solutions for
them once they exist. This is certainly the case in
your industry. Power plant siting criteria are nec-
essary and represent a rational starting place for
avoiding future  problems. The establishment of
such criteria will be a major instrument in con-
vincing the American public that power  produc-
tion and environmental degradation are not sy-
nonymous. The  most serious  problems of envi-
ronmental  damage encountered by your industry
in the past can  largely be avoided through  the
adoption of  sound siting criteria in the future.
The Administration's Power Plant Siting Act will
provide the necessary basis for environmentally-
sound national growth. This  legislation attacks
siting problems on a case-by-case basis. It incor-
porates a  systematized  approach to  advanced
planning and allows for public disclosure which
would facilitate environmental review and reduce
the delays you are now experiencing. You should
be the strongest supporter of this legislation. I am
certain you will not fully escape from public con-
troversy and criticism until power plant siting
                                                                                10

-------
decisions are made pursuant to a regulatory sys-
tem which provides to the public full confidence
that environmental considerations are being ac-
corded all appropriate attention. If you lead the
way in finding the solutions to your environmen-
tal problems, I am sure you will find public criti-
cism will change into public support. The Power
Plant Siting Act provides an efficient vehicle for
both  optimizing environmental  protection and
facilitating the expansion of power supply.

  In  closing, I wish to make it clear that I have
no illusions that this job which you and we jointly
share, is easy.  Some requirements imposed in the
name of environmental protection may be  un-
wise.  Others may be unachievable. In such cases,
power industry representatives have  not only the
right, but also the obligation to speak out clearly
and express their dissent. As one present exam-
ple, the implementation  plans being developed
under the Clean Air  Act of  1970  will impose
enormous burdens, and the time allowed by Con-
gress  for  resolving the endless  complexities is
too short to make it possible for all mistakes to
be avoided. Your industry must participate in
thrashing  out  of those problems, and, in some
instances,  you will find  yourselves  opposed to
the environmentalists.
  Within EPA we have an awesome responsibil-
ity to perform  the duties assigned to us in a man-
ner which does not impose improper  require-
ments on you.  Our actions have far-reaching con-
sequences, and we are continuously required to
take action in a very tight time schedule. We wish
we had the wisdom of Solomon,  yet clearly we
do not. In  addition to environmental  require-
ments, there are also many other legal and tech-
nical  complications that make it difficult—some-
times seemingly impossible— for you to do your
job and comply with our requirements even with
unlimited  expenditures and unquestioned  inten-
tions.
  Thus, I am not saying that the conflicts  be-
tween environmental protection and power gene-
ration are easy or that the issues are one-sided.
What I mean to suggest, and I hope to do this as a
friend rather than as a critic, is that your indus-
try today not only faces an immediate and con-
tinuing crisis to provide adequate electric gener-
ating capacity, but also faces  a critical long-term
challenge to preserve its position of respect and
leadership in society. The current public concern
forces  a  profound revision in the operating ob-
jectives of each utility. Your  goal is, and always
has been, public  service. What is changing and
being broadened is the meaning of the term "pub-
lic service." That concept must  now include a
major  and costly emphasis  on  environmental
protection.
  Power supply and environmental protection do
pose certain conflicts, but these problems simply
must be  solved. In the  long  run, the objectives
must be  reconciled, and I have confidence they
will be reconciled.
  U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                      11
                                                                         OPO : 1872 O - 470- 712

-------
                                                               504
 1                             D.  Bryson
 2             I think it would be appropriate  for the benefit  of
 3   the conferees and the audience to  briefly  summarize the back-
 4   ground of the thermal question to  refresh  your memories and
 5   to bring you up to date,
 6             At the First Session of  the Lake Michigan Enforce*
 7   ment Conference held in 1968 in Chicago, the conferees dis-
 8   cussed the rapidly increasing construction  of nuclear  power
 9   generating stations designed to use Lake Michigan for cooling,
10   They found that, in addition to one existing nuclear  power-
11   plant, five more were proposed or  under construction  at Lake
12   Michigan cities and projected for  completion between  1970  and
13   1973,  They agreed that the combined impact  of siting many
14   reactors on the shores of the lake must be considered so
15   that this activity would not result in pollution from waste-
16   water heat or from the discharge of excessive  amounts of
17   radionuclides,
13             The conferees established a Technical Committee  in
19   1968 to develop guidelines for pollution control from these
20   nuclear powerplants.  The committee presented their report
2.1   at the Second Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Con-
22   ference held in February of 1969.   While the committee did
     reach some tentative conclusions on certain aspects of the
  *   thermal issue, the main theme of their report was that
     sufficient information was not available to permit

-------
                                                               505





                               D, Bryson



 2   establishment of a  basinwide  regulation on powerplant waste



 o   disposal.  The conferees accepted the report and developed a



     general recommendation.



               The thermal question was discussed by the conferees



     at the March 31, April 1, and May 7, 1970, Executive Sessions



     and a variety of proposals were made for controlling waste



     heat discharges.  At the May 7 session, the conferees agreed



 9   that a series of technical sessions would be necessary to



10   fully evaluate the thermal question.  These workshop sessions



11   were held on September 2&-30 and October 1 and 2, 1970, and



12   were devoted solely to the thermal question.



13             At the October 29, 1970, Executive Session, the



14   conferees authorized the formation of a Technical Committee



15   to specifically review the various proposals that had been



16   made up to that point.  The committee's report was presented



17   at the 1971 session last March.  At this session, extensive



     time was again devoted to the subject of waste heat dis-



19   charges.



20             On the basis of the full discussion on the ques-



21   tion, the conferees made certain findings and recommendations,



22   These findings and recommendations were approved by EPA



23   Administrator William D. Ruckelshaus on May 14, 1971.  In



     the case of items 13 and 25, where the conferees were unable



2 5   to reach a unanimous position, Mr. Ruckelshaus supported the

-------
                                        	506

 1                             D. Bryson
 2   Federal position and requested the concurrence of the
 3   reluctant conferee.
 4             For ease of future reference, Mr. Chairman, I would
 5   like to introduce a copy of those findings and recommendation!
 6   in my statement as if read, at this point
 7             MR. MAYO:  Fine.
               (The document above referred to follows in its
 9   entirety.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

-------
                                    MAY 14


Mr. William L. Blase*
Director, Illinois Environmental
  Protection ;Ygeney
2200 Churchill Hood
Springfield, Illinois   62705

Dear Hr. Blaser:

       I wish to thank  you end Mr.  Bavid P.  Currie for the
cooperation of the Illinois  Siivironoental Protection Agency in
connection with the third session of the conference in the natter
of pollution of Lake Hichigcsn  and its tributary basin, held under
the provisions of section 10 of the Fedezal  Water jrollution
Control Act, as ci-uondod (33  U.3.C.  1160) on  J-?arch 31 «nd April 1,
1970, ot iiiluau-tee, Wisconsin; rsty  7, l'J70,  ett Chicago, Illinois/
Scpte?nber S:3«30, ocad October 1-2, l'^7v> ( ."orkphors Sessions) at
Chicago, Illinois:/ October 2>k, 3.970 (Txeautive Jossion) at Grand
Rapids, !iiehif*an; ami ikirch  23-2b,  1971,  at  Chicago*

       In accordance vrith the  provisions of  tiae Act, we have pre»
pared the enclosed tiusimry oZ  Conference.  Copies of the transcript
will be r
-------
                                -3-
                 vcnoa r.ay IKS reconvene3 at tbi call of the
Cli.nl rmazi.

                                 Sincevc.Ty
                                 V?illia..i D.
 R.  Light:pjd  4/16/71  WQO
 ccs  Great Lakes Regional Office

 SIMILAR LETTER SENT TO;

 Mr. Lester P.  Voigt7 Secretary
 Wisconsin Department of Natural
  Resources
 Hill Farms State Office Bldg.
 P.  0. Box 450
 Madison, Wisconsin  53701

 Mr. Ralph W. Purdy
 Executive Secretary
 Michigan Water Resources Commission
 Station A, Stevens T. Mason Bldg.
 Lansing, Michigan  48913

 Mr. Perry Miller
 Technical Secretary
 Indiana Stream Pollution Control Board
 1330 West Michigan Street
 Indianapolis,  Indiana  46207

-------
                       SUMMARY  OF  CONFERENCE
                          (THIRD SESSION)
                   POLLUTION OF LAKE  MICHIGAN
                      AND  ITS TRIBUTARY BASIN
               (WISCONSIN-ILLINOIS-INDIANA-MICHIGAN)

                   March  31 and April 1,  1970
                           May 7,  1970
        September  28-30 and October 1-2,  1970  (Workshops)
                        October 29, 1970
                   March  23, 24,  and  25,  1971
       The  third  session of  the conference  in  the  matter  of

pollution of Lake Michigan and its  tributary basin (Wisconsin-

Illinois-Indiana-Michigan) was held on March 31 and April  1,

1970, at the Pfister Hotel,  Milwaukee, Wisconsin;  May  7,  1970

(Executive  Session), at the  Sheraton Blackstone Hotel, Chicago,

Illinois/ September 28-30, and October 1-2, 1970 (Workshop

Sessions),  at the Sherman House, Chicago, Illinois; October 29,

1970 (Executive Session), at the Holiday Inn North, Grand  Rapids,

Michigan; and March 23-25, 1971, at the Sherman House, Chicago,

Illinois, under the provisions of section 10 of The Federal

Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1160).  The

first conference session was held on January 31, February  1-2,

February 5-7, March 7-8, and March  12, 1968, and the second

session was held on February 25, 1969.  The conference was

initiated on the basis of a written request to the Secretary of

the Interior from the Honorable Otto Kerner, Governor of Illinois,

and on the basis of reports, surveys, or studies, under procedures

described in section 10 of the Federal Act,

-------
                               -2-
       The following conferees representing the State water

pollution control agencies of Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana,

and Michigan, and the (J. S. Environmental Protection Agency

participated in the conference:
ILLINOIS

Clarence W. Klassen
  (Retired February 4, 1971)
William J. Blaser
David P. Currie
Director
Illinois Environmental Pro-
  tection Agency
Springfield, Illinois

Director
Illinois Environmental Pro-
  tection Agency
Springfield, Illinois

Chairman
Illinois Pollution Control
  Board
Chicago, Illinois
INDIANA

Blucher A. Poole
  (Retired September 30,
   1970)
Perry Miller
Technical Secretary
Indiana Stream Pollution
  Control Board
Indianapolis, Indiana

Technical Secretary
Indiana Stream Pollution
  Control Board
Indianapolis, Indiana
MICHIGAN
Ralph W. Purdy
Executive Secretary
Michigan Water Resources
  Commission
Lansing, Michigan

-------
                               -3-
WISCONSIN
John A. Beale
Thomas Prangos
Donald Mackie
Deputy  Secretary
Wisconsin Department  of
  Natural Resources
Madison, Wisconsin

Administrator
Division of  Environmental
  Protection
Wisconsin Department  of
  Natural Resources
Madison, Wisconsin

Executive Assistant
Wisconsin Department  of
  Natural Resources
Madison, Wisconsin
FEDERAL
Franc is T. Mayo
Murray Stein, Chairman
Great Lakes Regional Director
Water Quality Office
Environmental Protection
  Agency
Chicago, Illinois

Assistant Commissioner
Enforcement and Standards
  Compliance
Water Quality Office
Environmental Protection
  Agency
Washington, D. C.
       The Chairman of the Conference pointed out that:
       1.  Under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as

amended (33 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.)> pollution of interstate or

navigable waters which endangers the health or welfare of any

persons is subject to abatement under procedures described in

section 10 of the Federal Act.

-------
                               -4-
       2.  The first step of these procedures is the calling




of a conference.






       3.  The purpo-se of the conference is to bring together




representatives of the States and the Environmental Protection




Agency to review the existing situation and the progress which




has been made, to lay a basis for future action by all parties




concerned, and to give the States, localities, and industries




an opportunity to take any remedial action which may be indi-




cated under State and local law.






       At the third session of the conference, the conferees'




considerations included:  controls for waste heat discharges;




pollution by pesticides, chlorides, phosphates, and total dis-




solved solids; and the status of compliance with conference




abatement schedules for municipal, industrial, and Federal




waste sources.






       In the light of conference and workshop session discus-




sions, the conferees, on March 25, 1971, reached the following




conclusions and recommendations:






                      WASTE HEAT DISCHARGES




FINDINGS






       1.  That the lake as a whole will not be warmed, except




in localized areas, by the discharges of waste heat from exist-




ing and presently proposed power plants.

-------
                                -5-
        2.   Safe  temperatures  in  the  lake  vary with  season

 and  species.


        3.   Heat  is not  persistent  in the  lake.


        4.   Timing of  food and fish hatching  is precarious.


        5.   In the summer, Lake Michigan is "a lake  over a

 lake;"  the  top one is much warmer  than the bottom one.


        6.   Maximum temperatures are  not safe for long periods

 -- lethal temperatures  must be related to time of exposure.


        7.   Mean  temperatures  must  be  lower than the maximums.


        8.   Fish  kill  hazards  are greatest in winter.


        9.   The area that would be  raised  in temperature more

 than 5° by  the heated discharge from a 1,000 megawatt (mw)

 nuclear plant, designed so as to maximize dilution, could if

 the only theoretical  appraisal in  the record (that  of Dr. D. W.

 Pritchard*)is correct, be limited  to the  order of ten acres,

 and the area raised 2  to the order of 100 acres.


      10.   If the only theoretical appraisal in the record

 (that of Dr. D.  W. Pritchard) is correct, such a plant could

be built so that any given particle of water, or any organism,

drawn through its condensers would be exposed to temperatures
*Donald W.  Pritchard, Professor, The Johns Hopkins University,
    Baltimore, Maryland.

-------
                               -6-
20° above ambient for two minutes during passage, and any




particle or organism discharged or entrained would be exposed




thereafter to temperatures more than 10° above ambient for




the order of forty-five seconds, more than 5° for six minutes,




and more than 2° for one and a half hours.






       11.  If the only theoretical appraisal in the record




(that of Dr. D. W. Pritchard) is correct, a properly designed




discharge structure can avoid any significant increase in




temperature on the lake bottom or along the shore.






       12.  Perfect mixing is not possible.  Consequently,




if no limits are imposed, the proliferation of waste heat




discharges from electric plants along the lake may result in




the warming by several degrees of a large fraction of the




inshore waters.






       13.  The interaction of two or more thermal plumes may




have a more than linear effect on the area affected by a rise




in temperature and on the residence time of any particle at




elevated temperatures.






       14.  A single 1,000 mw nuclear plant will create a




small zone uninhabitable by certain species of fish during




the warmer months, and unsuitable for spawning and other sig-




nificant fish activities at various times.

-------
                                -7-
        15.  An unknown percentage of organisms passing  through




the condensers of a power plant vrill be killed or damaged by




heat, physical shock, or chemicals.  Therefore,  the damage  is




likely  to be proportional to the volume of water intake.






        16.  Discharges from a single large plant located in a




spawning ground or across a migratory route could significantly




disrupt the balance of the affected species throughout  the  lake.






        17.  If the only theoretical appraisal in the record




(that of Dr. D. W. Pritchard) is correct, the residence time




of algal cells in the heated plume from a properly designed




single 1,000 mw plant is probably too short to cause any




detectable shift to less desirable species, and no significant




increase in total algal mass is to be expected.






       18.  The Illinois Conferrte proposed the following!




       On the basis of information currently available, unless




it is located so as to inrerfere with spawning or migration,




a single 1,000 mw plant will have local effects, some of which




have been noted above, but may not upset the balance of the




lake as a whole.   (The Indiana and Michigan Conferees concurred




in this finding.)

-------
                               -8-
           The Federal Conferee proposed the following:




       On the basis of available information, unless it is




located so as to interfere with spawning or migration, a




single 1,000 mw plant will have local effects, some of which




have been noted above, but the effect upon the balance of the




lake as a whole is not known at this time.  (The Wisconsin




Conferee concurred in this finding,)






       19.  Proliferation of waste heat discharges from




electric plants along the lake could seriously worsen the




problem of nuisance algae by favoring the less desirable




species and could seriously alter the balance of fish and




other organisms in the lake as a whole.







       20.  Various alternative methods of heat disposal are




technically feasible, including wet and dry cooling towers,




cooling ponds, and spray canals.  The backfitting of all but




dry towers is technically feasible.






       21.  To backfit wet towers at a single 2,100 mw nuclear




plant would cost somewhere between $20 million and $120 million.




At the Zion plant, this is estimated to cost average residen-




tial customers somewhere between 10<: and 69<* per month.

-------
                               -9-
       22.  All alternative cooling means may have some




undesirable environmental effects.  Wet towers can cause fog




problems.  Towers discharge blowdown water that may require




treatment before release.  Dry towers may cause as yet undeter-




mined meteorological changes.  Both wet and dry towers ar«




bulky additions to the lakefront.  Cooling ponds consume about




two acres of land per megawatt.






       23.  The existing Federally approved water quality




standards to control waste heat discharges do not offer ade-




quate protection for the waters of Lake Michigan and its




continued beneficial uses.






       24.  The effective management of waste heat discharges




into Lake Michigan makes it desirable for the states to adopt




reasonably uniform minimum water quality standards.






       25.  The Federal Conferee proposed the following;




       The evidence presented to the Conference does not permit




a determination of the overall damage of large waste heat dis-




charges to Lake Michigan from existing or planned power genera-




tion plants.   (The Conferees representing Illinois, Indiana,




Michigan, and Wisconsin did not concur in this conclusion.)

-------
                               -10-
       26.  Additional evidence is desirable as to the




behavior of waste heat plumes during winter months.  Their




impact on the ecosystem of Lake Michigan is not now fully




assessable.






RECOMMENDATIONS






       In order to protect Lake Michigan, the following con-




trols for waste heat discharges are concurred in by the




Conferees representing Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the




U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Municipal waste and




water treatment plants, and vessels are exempted from these




recommendations.






I.  Applicable to all waste heat discharges except as noted




    above:




         1.  At any time, and at a maximum distance of 1,000




feet from a fixed point adjacent to the discharge, (agreed



upon by the State and Federal regulatory agencies), the




receiving water temperature shall not be more than 3°F above




the existing natural temperature nor shall the maximum tem-




perature exceed those listed below whichever is lower:

-------
                                -11-
                                Surface  3  feet
          January                      45°
          February                     45°
          March                        45°
          April                        55°
          May                          60°
          June                         70°
          July                         80°
          August                       80°
          September                    80°
          October                      65°
          November                     60°
          December                     50°
         2.  Water intake  shall be designed and located  to

minimize entrainment and damage to desirable aquatic organisms.

Requirements may vary depending upon local situations but,  in

general, intakes are to have minimum water velocity, shall  not

be influenced by warmer discharge waters, and shall not  be  in

spawning or nursery areas  of important fishes.  Water velocity

at screens and other exclusion devices shall also be at  a

minimum.


         3.  Discharge shall be such that geographic areas

affected by thermal plumes do not overlap or intersect.  Plumes

shall not affect fish spawning and nursery areas nor touch  the

lake bottom.


         4.  Each discharger shall complete preliminary  plans

for appropriate facilities by December 31, 1971, final plans by

June 30, 1972, and piluce such facilities, in operation by

December 31, 1973, however, in cases where natural draft towers

are needed, this date shall be December 31, 1974.

-------
                               -12-
       5.  All facilities discharging more than a daily average




of 0.5 billion BTU/hour of waste heat shall continuously record




intake and discharge temperature and flow and make those




records available to regulatoiry agencies upon request.






II.  Applicable to all new waste heat discharges exceeding a




     daily average of 1/2 billion BTU/hour, except as noted




     above, which have not begun operation as of March 1,




     1971, and which plan to use Lake Michigan waters for




     cooling:






       1.  Cooling water discharges shall be limited to that




amount essential for blowdown in the operation of a closed




cycle cooling facility.






       2.  Plants not in operation as of March 1, 1971, will




be allowed to go into operation provided they are committed




to a closed cycle cooling system construction schedule




approved by the State regulatory agency and EPA.  In all cases,




construction of closed cycle systems and associated intake and




discharge facilities shall be completed' by December 31, 1974,




for facilities utilizing natural draft towers and December 31,




1973, for all other types of closed cycle systems.

-------
                               -13-
III.  The States agree to file with EPA within six months a




      plant by plant program identifying corrective actions




      for the modification of intake facilities, including




      power plants, municipal, and industrial users, to




      minimize the entrainment and damage to desirable




      aquatic organisms.






 IV.  The Conferees agree that there should not be a pro-




      liferation of new power plants on Lake Michigan, and




      that in addition to the above controls, limitations




      should be placed on large volume heated water dis-




      charges by requiring closed cycle cooling systems,




      using cooling towers or alternative cooling systems




      on all new power plants.
       As an alternative to the above (Recommendations I - IV),




the Illinois Conferee proposed the following recommendation for




the consideration of the Conferees and the Administrator of the




U. S. Environmental Protection Agency:






       "It is recommended that limitations should be placed on




large volume heated water discharges by requiring closed cycle




cooling systems, using cooling towers or alternative cooling




systems, on all new sources discharging more than a daily aver-




age of 0.1 billion BTU/hour and not yet under construction."

-------
                               -14-
                           PESTICIDES






       The conferees strongly support the work of the Conference




Technical Committee on pesticides, and agree that attempts be




made to finance the work of the Committee from all possible




sources.  The conferees recommend that:






       1.  The work of the Committee be expanded in the area of




PCB's and that the Committee also take up the problem of metal-




lic salts/






       2.  The monitoring program for pesticides continue/






       3.  The sources of pesticides to the Lake be identified/






       4.  The Committee recommend specific action to be taken




by the conference.  These recommendations are to be furnished




to the Conferees in advance of the next meeting.
                      STATUS OF COMPLIANCE






       The conferees agree that each State will prepare and pro-




vide to the conferees within four weeks a full report on the




status of compliance by municipalities and industries with the




conference recommendations.   The Federal conferee will provide

-------
                               -15-
to the conferees a status report on Federal installations within




four w-2eks.
                            CHLORIDES






       The States will provide to the conferees a listing of all




identifiable chloride sources of significance in the conference




area.  The Federal conferee, after consultation with the States




on measures for control of chlorides, will make a proposal for




chloride control at the next conference session.  The Federal




conferee will also provide to the conferees a State-by-State




resume* of the water quality standards on chlorides.   This report




will also show the relationship of the standards to the existing




water quality.






                           PHOSPHATES






       A committee will be established by the Federal and State




conferees to make a determination on whether the existing phos-




phate control program is effective or whether it will need to




be revised.  Should revisions be determined necessary, the com-




mittee will consider whether the existing information is suffi-




cient to recommend an improved program.   The recommendations of




the committee will be provided to the conferees prior to the next

-------
                               -16-
conference session.  The assembly of necessary existing data



and information on State programs for phosphate control will



be coordinated through the Federal conferee prior to the



establishment of the committee.

-------
                                        	507

 1                             D,  Bryson
 2             MR. BRISON:   Subsequent to  the issuance  of the
 3   approved findings and recommendations by Mr.  Ruckelshaus,
 4   the four Lake Michigan States took certain actions relating
 5   to implementing the conference recommendations.  While the
 6   individual States will undoubtedly be reporting this informa-
 7   tion in greater detail, I would like to present a  brief
     summary of their actions at this time
 9             In my complete statement, I have a number of pages
10   devoted to this summary.  We have reduced this information
11   to a tabular form which has been distributed to the conferees
12   and is generally available.  This summary does present a
13   comparison between the conference recommendations and the
     individually State-adopted water quality standards
15             (The document above referred to follows in its
     entirety.)
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

-------
                                                         OF !A"E MICHI1'"!
         Conference RccoT-q'idations
                                           Michigan Standards
                                                                       Indiana SPC 4-R
                                                                                                Illinois Standards
                                                                                                                          Wisconsin  'ID
 Applicable to all  waste heat dis-
 ch-rg-.'s  except municipal  waste and
 water treaf=nt plant* and vessels.
     At  any ti^e,  and at a naxitnun
     distance of 1 ,GC3 feet frora a
     fi;;at?r velocity,  shall  not bs^
    influ«r,ct'd by nanr.er discharge
    w?t?rs ard shall not ba  in
    W.-.'N inc  nr nt-r^ory a«-r.ie nf
    in-poilo't fisi.cs.  ,;ater velocity
    2t scre:-.>> and ether exclusion
    devices shall be at minicun.

    Discr.argt shill he such  that
    geographic areas affected by
    thirr^l olives dn not  ov-rlap
    Or i'-terstct.  Plur?s  S'all
    not  affect fish spa'-mmg and
    nursery areas ror touch  the
    botto-: of the lake.

    Each discharc-jr shall  conlete
    preliminary puns for  aDGropri-
    aLe  foe; '.itits t>/ 12/31 '71,
    fi'-.al pl:i3 by 6/30/72 a"d
    plac*> sc.'n facilities  in ooer-
    atio by  !?/3i/r3, ha-evtr,
    in cases whe'C natural  d-aft
    tow^*"s are ncideJ, this  cste"
    shali ^
S.  All facHitipi discharaing
    tors trir. 5 d.'ily aver^'-e of
    .5 biUicr. ClC-'nr. s-^11 ccr.-
    V>^X a-d r^ke thc:e reco
    available to re-ijlatory
    4Scr,cies wen requsst.
                                          Regjlations for dis-
                                          charinq over
                                          .5 billion  BTU/hr.
                                          apply only to dis-
                                          charges using water
                                          for cooling.

                                          Mixing zone to be
                                          estabii;ned on a case
                                          by case b?sis and be
                                          desicncd to r'ninize
                                          effects on aquatic
                                          biota, based en the
                                          results of current
                                          studies.

                                          Sara requirement
                                          Except - monthly
                                          mnxiffiijT.s ray be
                                          exceeded due to
                                          natural  causes.
                                          (liote:   lovier mon-
                                          thly pdxinucs estab-
                                          lished for area north
                                          of a line runiing due
                                          west from Pentwater).

                                          Same requirement
                                          Except  - no specific
                                          prohibition against
                                          infiut-'ncs  at  intaice
                                          by v;amer  discharge
                                          water.
                                         Same requirererit
                                         Except - no scecific
                                         prohibition against
                                         tourhinj tl.r bPtton
                                         of the lake.
                                         No dates specified
                                         in the standards.
                                         The Stat? requires
                                         ccipliance with
                                         standards by issuir-)
                                         orcers of de.ternina-
                                         ci.w to individual
                                         d'schjrgers.
                                         flo specific re^uire-
                                         rcr.t in tr-e stai.Jards.
                                         ''o:ivhly crerutir.g
                                         rjports .ire rxqjired
                                         by tr,e State.
 Same exemptions -  4
 Sa"ie  retjuirecent  -4d-
 Except  "...  adjacent
 to  tne  discnarce  and
 or  as agreed upon by
 trie State and Federal
 regulatory agencies."
 Same requirement  -4d-
Sarie  requirenent -4f-
Excect  - no specific
prohibition against
influence at intase
by wander discharge
water.
"are requirerent 4g+b
Applicable cnly to
discharges other than-
those no1./ in existence
for plu"? overlap or
intersection.
No dates specified in
the standards.  The
proposed ti.-e schedule
will be a cart of the
inDlor-^nljti Dn plan
now u:id2r cevelcprent.
Sar:e requirement
 So specified exemp-
 tion
 2C6(e)0)(A)  "...  t
 mixing  zone which
 shall be no greater
 than  a  circle with
 a  radius of 1,000
 feet  or an equal fixed
 area  of simple form."
 Same  requirement  -
 206(l)(A)(iii). Cxceot-
 no  rention  of  a tem-
 perature measurerent
 in  the  surface three
 feet.
206(e)(2)(F)  "All rea-
sonable steps shall be
taken to reduce the
nur.tir of orcaniirr.s
drawn into or against
the intanes."  Appli-
cable only to sources
oT heated effluent not
in operation as of
1/1/71.
San» requlrenent
2u6,'2)(;,)(2) and (.'!)
Applicable only to
sc-jrces of h^itoH
effluent not in
operation as of 1/1/71.
"o dates specified in
tne standards oth-r than:
9"{*)(1) Operating per-
nit required for any
wastev.'3tcr source ccn-
Sistlhg of nnn-cortact
cooling w.iT:er by
6/3D/73. 5tan-lird>:
iiHple.-e"trttirn -!;n now
under d£t?lop~,ent.
SOI "onitorirg and
reporting cf -,rifluents
and efi'iucrts required
by the St^te.
 Same exemptions  -
  102.04  (5)
••'jxing zone 'to  be
 established by  the
 Deoartnent using the
 results of a required
 2 year study.
 Same reauire*'"nt
 102.04(1 )(a){b). Except-
 maxir/j-is do not anply
 in Milhauke: Harbor,  °?r
 Washington "arbor, and
 the nouth of the Fox  R-'.
 No mention of the tem-
 perature neasureient  in
 the surface three feet.
 102.0J{4) The Ceoart-
 ir.ent ray order the
 reduction of therral
 discndrges to Lake
 MichicaT if er.viron-
 eeica.1 oarage appears
 iminent or existent.
 1C2.r4!4) The 3epart-
 rent .-ay order tne
 reduction of thsrral
 discharges to Lake
 Michigan if environ-
 nental  da~ace appears
 isminent or existent.

 No dates specified
 in the  standards other
 than:  iC?.(>!(2)(c)
 Oischarcars exceeding
 a  da i 1,- a 'crag-2 of
 .5 bilii'n 8TU/hr.
 snail  s^'jTit a pr»-
 iTininary "noinoering
 recoct  fcr alternative
 cool ing s/sters by
 8/1/72.

 10?.«(2)(a) Discharges
 exciejinr; a daily
 averari of .5 billion
 BTU/nr.  shall sjb-it
 monthlv resorts of
 ten^erature and flow
 dati to thi Department
 eonnencing 4/1/72.

-------
                                              CWARISON OF IAKE MlfJUr,,"'! TllpMI  _r,TA ilWDS (cont'd)
Enforcement Conference Recommendations
 Michigan Standards
                                                                         Indiana SPC 4-R
                                                                                                  111inois Standards
                                                                                                                           Wisconsin  NR 102.04
II.  Applicable to all new waste heat
     discharges exceeding a dally
     averane of .5 billion BTU/hr.,
     except as noted above, which have
     not begun operation as of 3/1/71.
     1.  Cooling water discharges  shall
         be limited to that amount
         essential  for blowdown  in
         the operation of a closed cycle
         cooling facility.

     2.  Plants not in operation as of
         March 1, 1971 will be allowed
         to go into operation provided
         they are conniitted to a closed
         cycle cooling system construc-
         tion schedule approved  by the
         State regulatory agency and
         EPA.  In all  cases, construc-
         tion of closed cycle systems
         and associate intake and
         discharge  facilities shall  be
         completed  by  December 31, 1974
         for facilities utilizing  natural
         draft towers  and December 31,
         1973 for all  other types  of
         closed cycle  systems.
Same requirement
Except - "All sources
of waste heat ...
which are planned for
start of construction
after 9/1/71 and prior
to 3/1/75 ..."
Same requirement
No requirement for
backfitting in the
standards other than
the statement that:
"Regardless of the
standards established,
if environmental
damage is measurable,
then modification must
be made."
Same requirement -4e
Except - "All new
waste heat, discharges
or enlargement of
existing facilities ..
which had not begun
operation as of the
effective date of this
regulation ..."
(2/11/72)

Same requirement -4e
Same requirerent -4e
Except - "Plants not
in operation as of
the effective date
of this regulation.."
(2/11/72) No compli-
ance dates specified
in the standards.
206(e)(3)(A) No
source of heated
effluent which was not
in operation or under
construction as of
1/1/71 shall discharge
more than a dally
average of 0.1 billion
BTU/hr. '
206(e)(l)(B) The
owner or operator
of a source of heated
effluent which dis-
charges 0.5 billion
BTU/hr. or more shall
demonstrate in a
hearing before this
Board not less than
5 nor more than 6
years after the
adoption of this regu-
lation (6/9/71), that
discharges from that
source have not caused
and cannot be reason-
ably expected in future
to cause significant
ecological damage to
the Lake.  If such
proof is not made to
the Board, backfitting
of alternative cooling
devices shall be
accorolished within a
reasonaMs tine as
determined by the Board.
206(e)(l)(D) Back-
fitting of alternative
cooling facilities will
bf renuired if, upon
cui''pidinc n led in
accordance with Board
rules, it is found at
any time that any
heated effluent causes
significant ecological
damage to the Lake.
102.04(3) Any plant
or facility, the con-
struction of which 1s
conmenccd after the
effective date of this
rule (2/1/72) shall
be so designed as to
avoid significant ther-
mal discharge to-
Lake Michigan.
No requirement for
backfitting in the
standards other than:
102.04(4) The Depart-
ment may order the
reduction of thermal
discharges to Lake
Michigan regardless
of interim measures
undertaken by the
source owners in com-
pliance with this
rule If environmental
damage appears
imminent or existent.

-------
                                           CCT?A°:scn or LAKE MICHIG
                                                                               STC-IOAE;OS  (cont'd)
force""?it Conference P«»conn'enc'ations
                                            ^ichican Standards
                                                                        Indiana  SPC  *-R
                                                                                                 Illinois Standards
                                                                                                                          Wisconsin  MR  103.54
    The States agree to file with EPA
    within six rontns a plant by
    plant proora"! identifyinn. correc-
    tive actior.s for the r-cdification
    r    take  facilities, including
    p     plants, municipal, and
    industrial  users, to ninir.ize
    the entrairr.ent and daraoe to
    desirable  aquatic organisms.
The require-ent to
file a report on
corrective reasures
HIM tre EPA is not
specified in the
standirds.  The State
nas rot filed such a
report.  Tne State
is presently conduc-
ting a plant by plant
evaluation of needs.
The requirenent to
file a  report on
corrective ressures
with tne EPA is not
specified in the
standards.  The
State has not filed
such a  report.  The
State is presently
conducting a plant
by plant evaluation
of needs in
connection with the
establishment of a
plan of irslerenta-
tion for the
revised standards.
 The requirenent to
 file a  report  on
 corrective measures
 with the  EPA  is  not
 specified in  the
 standards.  The  State
 has not filed  such a
 report.   T*-a  State
 is  presently  conduc-
 ting a  plant by  plant
 evaluation  of  needs
 in  ccnr.ection  with
 the establishment
 of  a plan of  imple-
 mentation for  the
 revised standards.
 The requirement
 to  file  a  report
 on  corrective
 measures with  the
 EPA is not specified
 in  th» standards.  The
 State has  not  filrt
 such a reoort  and is
f.ot requiring  any "odi-
 fication for Wisconsin
 plants at  the  present
tine.
V.  The Conferees  agree  that there
    should  not  be  a  arjliferation
    of ne.<  pc'jer oiar.ts  en L»".s
    Michigan, and  tnat in  addition
    to the  abo/e controls, Ii-ita-
    tions sho'j'd be  31 deed on
    large volume heated  wster dis-
    ch^rjos t;  requiring closed
    cycle cooli"g  systa-s, using
    Cwliny L«j«cri UN  al Lcrnitl ve
    ccoiing s^steTis  on all new
    power plants.
The State resuires
closed cycle cooling
syste-s on plar.ts
which are Planned for
start sf construction
after 9/1/71 and prior
to 3/1/75.  Pr» and
post operational
studies at several
Idry? electrical
porter ccneratinq
stations are presently
being conducted to
assess the effects of
heated water discharge
oo the Lake.
The State requires
closed cycle ccoiing
systems on plants
wnicn "»va not begun
operation as of
2/11/72.  No new
Lj!;3 iitss proposed
in Indiana other
than those listed
in 1971.
The State reouires
that no plant which
was not in operation
or und;r construction
as of 1/1/7! shall
discharge ir-ore than a
diily sverig; of
0.1 billion 5TU/hr.
Discharges exceeding
.5 billion uTu/nr.
have to deronstrate
not less than 5 nor
more than 6 years
after the adoption
of the State's regu-
lation thst their
iischsrge his not
CuuStd ild Cc'.r.Qt DC
expected ired for the
existing plant.
The State requires  thit
any plant, trie construe
tion of whicn is  ccrre-
ced aner 2/1/72. shal'.
be so designed as to
avoid significant
t.her-jl discharge to
Lake T.chigan.  dis-
chargers exceeding  a
caily average of  .5
billicn DTU/hr. have  tc
corplete an investiga-
tion and study of tha
environnental and
ecological irpact of
their discharge by
2/1/74.

-------
 1                             D. Bryson



 2             At this point, I am going to risk summarizing the



 3   summary table.



 4             Indiana was the only State to adopt almost verbatim



 5   the general recommendations dealing with all waste heat dis-



 6   charges.  The other three States made departures in such item!



 7   as mixing zone definition and plant implementation.



 8             The second major thermal recommendation required



 9   backfitting on certain waste heat sources*  Again, Indiana



10   was the only State to adopt this recommendation in its



11   entirety.



12             The third major item,  dealing with this issue,



13   called for the States to submit a plant-by-plant program to



14   bring appropriate dischargers into compliance with the con-



15   ference recommendations.  This report was to have been sub-



16   mitted to the conferees 6 months after the last session.



17   None of the four States submitted this plan.



13             The fourth major thermal recommendation dealt with



19   the question of proliferation of new powerplants on Lake



20   Michigan.



21             Indiana adopted this concept.  Michigan placed a



22   moratorium until March 1, 1975.   Illinois placed a limit on



23   the amount of discharge that would be allowed from future



2^   plants.  And Wisconsin requires a detailed study before a



 •*   decision will be made.

-------
   r^____	509

 1                             D*  Bryson
 2             In order to achieve the conferees'  objective of
 3   protection of the lake,  it is mandatory to  maintain a de-
 4   tailed status of compliance on established  requirements.
 5   EPA has attempted to compile such a detailed status of com-
 6   pliance on all dischargers covered by the thermal pollution
 7   control requirements as adopted by the conferees.  This
 &   information was furnished by the individual States and sup-
 9   plemented by information EPA had available.  This information
10   is presented in tabular form in my statement.
11             Rather than discuss" the tables at this time, it
12   would be more appropriate to wait until the individual State
13   presentations.
14             Certain Federal administration procedures must  be
15   followed and permits received in order for  a powerplant  to
16   legally operate.  These procedures may include permits  from
17   the Corps of Engineers and the Atomic Energy Commission.
13             With respect to the Corps of Engineers permits,  all
19   powerplants except the Bailly Nuclear Generating Facility
20   have applied for and received Section 10 permits relating
21   to construction of intake and outfall facilities in Lake
2?
  ^   Michigan.
  ^             The Refuse Act Permit Program, administered by
  *   the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental
25
     Protection Agency, requires all dischargers of industrial

-------
                                                               510





 1                             D. Bryson



 2   wastewater to obtain permits which specify permissible waste



 3   loadings.  This program as such applies to all thermal dis-



 1^   chargers covered by the conference recommendations in ques-



 5   tion.  All major powerplant dischargers under construction



 6   by this conference have applied for permits,



 7             As a result of a court decision, discharge permits



 8   are not being issued by the Corps of Engineers at the present



 9   time.  However, EPA is working with the States to complete



10   the processing of applications so that permits, with suit-



11   able conditions, will be ready when they may once more be



12   issued.  This overall program has provided a great quantity



13   of valuable data, which is now contributing to many Lake



14   Michigan Enforcement Conference reports.



15             The Atomic Energy Commission has established



16   detailed procedures that must be followed by applicants for



17   nuclear powerplant operating and construction licenses,



IS             In my detailed report, Table V summarizes these



19   steps and depicts the status of the facilities located on



20   the Lake Michigan shore.



21             The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969



22   requires the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements



23   on each major facility.  These statements are detailed



2^-   analyses of environmental effects of proposed action which



2 5   all Federal agencies are required to prepare and use in

-------
   	511
 1                            D. Bryson
 2   their agency review processes before they may take any "major
 3   actions" which "significantly affect the quality of the human
 ^   environment."
 5             The Environmental Impact Statements are required
 6   of all major powerplants planned or under construction on
 7   Lake Michigan.  These statements are being prepared by the
 g   Atomic Energy Commission and they are at various stages of
 9   completion from the major plants located on Lake Michigan.
10             In addition to the administrative proceedings
11   relating to the nuclear powerplant question on Lake Michigan,
12   there have been a number of judicial proceedings involving
13   the powerplants.  These lawsuits have sprung from the admin-
14   istrative and regulatory hearings and others have been based
15   upon independent grounds.  All lawsuits to date, that in-
16   volve the thermal issue either directly or indirectly, deal
17   with the construction or operation of a nuclear powerplant
IB   located on the lake.
19             Again, I refer you to my written statement for a
20    summary of these pending and completed litigation activities.
21             Earlier in my statement, I mentioned that exten-
22    sive  testimony had been presented to the  conferees on the
23    thermal question on Lake Michigan.  Since the March 1971
24    conference,  additional work has been completed on the lake
25    and elsewhere that bears on the question  before the conferees

-------
                               	       512

 1                            D, Bryson
 2   For that reason, EPA entered into a contract with the Argonne
 3   National Laboratory for a review of any new technical informa-
     tion relevant to the environmental effects of thermal dis-
 5   charges into Lake Michigan, which is not reflected in the
 6   existing record of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference.
 7             I have attached to my statement a copy of that
     completed report.  Let me spend just a minute briefly sum-
 9   marizing its contents.
10             MR. MAYO:  Excuse me, Mr. Bryson.  Do you want
11   that report introduced into the record?
12             MR. BRYSON:  Yes.  It is a part of my statement so
13   I would like it introduced as if read.
               (The document above referred to follows in its
15   entirety.)
16             MR. BRYSON:  The primary sources of information for
17   the report included hearing testimony from local, State and
18   Federal pollution control agencies, reports from the Great
     Lakes Fisheries Laboratory of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisher-•
     ies and Wildlife, universities performing research on Lake
     Michigan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits, technical and
22
     environmental reports prepared by or for power companies dis-
     charging into Lake Michigan, and Environmental Impact State-
 *   ments prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission.  Results
25
     from studies conducted on bodies of water other than Lake

-------
Summary of Recent Technical Information

  Concerning Thermal Discharges into

             Lake Michigan
                   by

    Center for Environmental Studies

                   &

    Environmental Statement Project

      Argonne National Laboratory
        9700 South Cass Avenue
        Argonne, Illinois 60439

                 for the

    Environmental Protection Agency

                Region V

          Enforcement Division

          Contract Report 72-1
              August 1972

-------
                               PREFACE

       This report, funded by the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
Region V, through an interagency agreement with the Atomic Energy
Commission, is a review of new technical information, relevant to the
environmental  effects of thermal discharges into Lake Michigan, which
is not reflected in the existing record of the Lake Michigan Enforcement
Conference.

       Between September 28 and October 2, 1970,  the Lake Michigan En-
forcement Conference held a -workshop in  Chicago,  Illinois, to consider
proposals for regulating waste  heat discharges to Lake Michigan. At this
workshop, testimony was presented by  staff of the U.S. Department of
Interior, the power industry, citizens, and various State and Federal agen-
cies.  A five-volume record  of the  proceedings was published.   Subsequent
meetings  of the enforcement conference were held on March 23-25,  1971.
A three-volume record of these proceedings was also published.

       Though  the records of the proceedings  of the Lake Michigan  En-
forcement Conference contain a substantial amount  of technical data rela-
tive to the environmental effects of the use of Lake  Michigan water for
cooling, subsequent  studies have produced technical results not previously
presented to the Conference.  This document, therefore,  is to provide a
summary of these subsequent studies.  The intent is that it be used at the
forthcoming Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, to be  reconvened on
September 19,  1972, as an aid in the discussions and deliberations related
to thermal discharges.

       The primary  sources of information for this report included testi-
mony from local, state, and federal pollution-control agencies; reports
from the Great Lakes Fisheries Laboratory of the U.S. Bureau of Sport
Fisheries and Wildlife; reports from universities performing research on
Lake Michigan; permits issued  by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers;
technical  and environmental  reports prepared by or for power companies
discharging into Lake Michigan; and environmental  impact statements pre-
pared by the Atomic Energy  Commission.  Results  from studies conducted
on bodies of water other than Lake Michigan and reports from the open
literature were cited if they were judged to be particularly relevant and  as
time permitted.

       The report is structured to discuss separately the physical and
biological aspects of thermal discharges.  The section on Ambient Lake
Conditions describes preoperational field  studies, thermal-bar measure-
ments, and general lakewide  phenomena that are pertinent to power-plant
siting considerations. The ambient lake conditions  are the reference points
from which all  environmental effects must be measured.  The section on
Studies Related to Thermal Plumes describes field  measurements of the
physical and biological characteristics of thermal discharges, summarizes

-------
mathematical modeling techniques, and describes some laboratory tests
on the biological effects of heated water.  The section on Intake and Dis-
charge Effects summarizes operational data from most of the power
plants on Lake Michigan, describes the intake and outfall designs of the
five major nuclear facilities sited on the lake, and discusses biological
effects observed at various power plants.

       The feasibility of using closed-cycle cooling systems instead of
once-through cooling was  discussed at previous Enforcement Conference
hearings.  There is little disagreement that the  general concept of  closed-
cycle cooling is feasible, with the possible exception of  certain  site-
specific  problems. The section on Alternative  Cooling Methods de-
scribes several analyses of closed-cycle cooling systems as reported in
some of  the Environmental Impact Statements and summarizes available
data on estimated costs of original installations and backfitting.  Chemical
discharges from both fossil-fired and nuclear power plants are tabulated
in the section on Chemical Inputs. This section also describes chemicals
used in condensers, process-water systems, cooling towers, and ponds
and reports on recent experiments to study the biological effects of various
concentrations of these chemicals.

       The intent was to prepare this report on an intermediate technical
level suitable for the layman as well as the scientist.  The  review of any
individual  reference  is necessarily brief and is  primarily to call attention
to the source if information in greater depth is required.  We have specifi-
cally refrained from  drawing conclusions from the material reported here
to minimize the influence  of our particular beliefs.

       The conclusions cited in this review are abstracted from the origi-
nal documents.  Where the conclusions  from similar studies are signifi-
cantly different,  these differences are identified without discussion.
                                    11

-------
                               CONTENTS

Section                                                             Page

   I.    INTRODUCTION	     1

   II.    AMBIENT LAKE CONDITIONS	     3

        A.  Physical Characteristics	     3

            1.  Lake Temperatures	     3
            2.  Inshore Currents	     5
            3.  Thermal Bar	     7

        B.  Biological Characteristics	    12

            1.  Fish	    12
            2.  Plankton	    21
            3.  Periphyton	    26
            4.  Benthos	    28

  in.    STUDIES RELATED TO THERMAL PLUMES	    31

        A.  Physical Characteristics	    31

            1.  Field Data	    33
            2.  Mathematical Modeling	    39
            3.  Hydraulic Modeling	    40
            4.  Effects on Shoreline Ice	    40

        B.  Biological Characteristics	    41

            1.  Waukegan Power Plant	    42
            2.  Point Beach Power Plant	    43
            3.  Blount Street Plant (Lake  Monona)	    45
            4.  Michigan City Station	    46
            5.  Bailly Plant	    47
            6.  J. .H. Campbell  Plant	    49
            7.  Miscellaneous Studies	    49

  IV.    INTAKE AND DISCHARGE EFFECTS	    52

        A.  Inventory of Designs	    52
            1.  Kewaunee Plant Cooling System	    58
            2.  Point Beach Plant  Cooling System	    60
            3.  Zion Station Cooling System	    60
            4.  D. C. Cook  Plant Cooling  System	    65
            5.  Palisades Plant Cooling System	    71

        B.  Biological Effects	    71
                                   111

-------
                              CONTENTS

Section                                                           Page

   V.    ALTERNATIVE COOLING METHODS	    79

        A.  Environmental Impact	    79

             1.  Davis-Besse Station	,	    79
             2.  Enrico Fermi Plant	    81
             3.  Zion Station -.	    83
             4.  Point Beach Station	    88
             5.  Kewaunee Plant	    89
             6.  Bailly Station	    93
             7.  D. C. Cook Plant	    95
             8.  Palisades Station	    96
             9.  Natural-draft-tower Operating Observations	    98
            10.  Drift Observations	    100
            11.  Theoretical Predictions	    102
            12.  Feasibility	    102

        B.  Monetary Costs	    102

             1.  Pulliam Plant	    105
             2.  Kewaunee Plant	    105
             3.  Point Beach Plant	    106
             4.  Zion Station	    107
             5.  Waukegan and State Line Plants	    107
             6.  Michigan City Plant	    108
             7.  Bailly Nuclear Plant	    108
             8.  D. C. Cook Plant	    108
             9.  Palisades Plant	    109
            10.  General Observations	    109

  VI.    CHEMICAL INPUTS	    110

        A.  Summary of Power-plant Effluents	    110

        B.  Standards Applicable  to Power Plants	    112
        C.  Chemicals for Removal of Organic Deposits in
            Condensers  and Process-Water Systems	    114

        D.  Chemicals for Treatment of Water-Steam System ....    118

        E.  Chemicals for Treatment of Cooling Towers and
            Ponds	    118

REFERENCES	    121
                                   IV

-------
                               FIGURES

No.                                                               Page

 1.  Ambient Lake Michigan Water Temperatures - April 23, 1970.     9
 2.  Generalized Schematic Modelof the Trophic Structure of Lake
     Michigan	    13
 3.  Maximum Estimated Thermal-plume Areas Associated with
     Municipal, Sanitary,  Industrial, Power-plant, and Natural
     River Thermal  Sources	    32
 4.  Thermal  Line-Scanner Image of Point  Beach Power Plant
     Plume	    37
 5.  Schematic of Kewaunee Condenser Cooling System	    59

 6.  Kewaunee Intake and Discharge Structure	    61
 7.  Schematic of Point Beach Condenser Cooling System	    62
 8.  Point Beach Intake Structure	    63
 9.  Schematic of Zion Condenser Cooling System	    64
10.  Zion Station Water-Intake Structure in Lake Michigan	    66
11.  Zion Traveling  Screens	    67
12.  Zion Unit 2 Discharge Structure	    68
13.  Schematic of Cook Condenser Cooling System	    69

14.  Donald C. Cook Intake System Schematic	    70
15.  Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Circulating System, Units 1 & 2 .    72
16.  Schematic of Palisades Condenser Cooling-Water System. ...    73

-------
                               TABLES

No.                                                               Page

 1.   Current Velocity Persistence Near Sheboygan, Wisconsin,
     1965	     6
 2.   Ecology of Some Important Lake Michigan Fish	    15

 3.   Fish  Species in Lake Michigan Near the Kewaunee Site	    19

 4.   Measurement of Residence Time in Thermal Plume	    48

 5.   Power Plant Operating Information	    53

 6.   Summary of Alternative Cooling Decision Factors	    90

 7.   Environmental Impact of Various Cooling Modes	    92

 8.   General Field Observation Data - 1970, Cooling Tower
     Plumes, Paradise Power Plant	   101

 9.   Increase In Busbar Cost Over Once-Through Design (Fossil
     Fueled Plants)	   104
10.   Increase in Busbar Cost Over Once-Through Design (Nuclear
     Plants)	   104

11.   Calculated Chemical Discharges into Lake Michigan in
     Pounds per Day	   Ill
                                  VI

-------
                           I.  INTRODUCTION

       Lake Michigan is a precious natural resource with many potential
beneficial uses for man.  He uses it for drinking water,  recreation, trans-
portation, food production, waste disposal, and cooling, to name a few.
Any of man's uses  of the lake will have an effect, though some uses have
significantly greater effects than others.

       We are beginning to observe the results of some of our  uses of this
body of water, and  many have expressed concern about the trends they have
seen.  The general public has recently become aware of a number  of the
potential problems, and their interest in preserving the  lake for its "best
and highest use (uses)" is  growing rapidly.  This is  aptly demonstrated by
the organizing and  convening of several sessions of  the Lake  Michigan En-
forcement Conference over the past few years and the attendant public
interest in them.

       The use of  Lake Michigan for cooling is receiving a large portion
of the public's  attention these days.  The magnitude  of water being used
and the projected requirement for the future is  difficult to comprehend, and
the public is rightfully questioning what the effects will be. Unfortunately
the scientific and technical information needed now to make rational de-
cisions is not available. Only recently have the resources, in terms of
manpower and dollars, been made available to acquire this information.
The results  of this developing effort are summarized here for use in the
considerations related to thermal-discharge standards.

        The  lake areas influenced by the thermal discharges  are only of in-
tesest in relation to their biological effects. Temperature controls the rates
of  most biological processes (metabolic rates,  disease, predation, etc.) and
increases in temperature from the thermal plumes  may cause  direct and in-
direct effects on biological systems.  Potential sources  of biological damage
associated with  once-through cooling are summarized in the  Final Environ-
mental Statement for the Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant.119 They are:

       (1)  Temperature increases of the cooling water, causing both direct
            effects and indirect effects on metabolism, growth, disease,
            predation, etc.
       (2)  Mechanical and pressure  changes that damage small organisms
            passing through pumps and condenser tubing.

       (3)  Impingement on intake screens of larger organisms, principally
            fish, drawn into the cooling-water intake.
       (4)  Chemicals used as biocides (usually chlorine) to  remove  slimes
            from the condenser tubing, and perhaps  other chemicals re-
            leased to the cooling water from a variety of plant  operations,
            all of which may be toxic to aquatic life.

-------
       (5)  Induced circulation of a water body, both in the local area of
            the discharge (which may influence migrations) and in the
            wider range of the water body (changing normal seasonal
            patterns).

       (6)  Radiation derived largely from radioactive nuclides taken up
            by terrestrial and aquatic organisms, •which could potentially
            induce radiation damage if concentrations of the nuclides were
            sufficiently high.

A seventh could be their combined effects.

       Reference 119 presents a ra-ther comprehensive discussion of these
potential  sources of biological damage and is recommended as an excellent
summary.

       The general subject  of effects of temperature on aquatic organisms
has been  reported in several scientific  reviews that became available in
1971.  Since this report is limited  specifically to Lake Michigan,  and since
it is impractical to  review a review, our guide to this wealth of new infor-
mation will consist  of a single reference to the publication by Coutant,
"Thermal Effects (Biological):  A Review of the Literature of 1971 on
Wastewater and Water  Pollution Control."    The review describes some
390 references, practically  all of which are dated 1971 or 1970.

-------
                   II.  AMBIENT LAKE CONDITIONS

       Adequate  knowledge of ambient lake conditions is required for at
least the following three reasons:

       1.  Standards are being developed to guide our actions in the design
and siting of power-generating stations.  Knowledge of ambient conditions
is  necessary to evaluate the validity of the standards as applied to different
areas; i.e., do the ambient conditions violate the standards?  Knowledge of
ambient  conditions is also necessary in the enforcement of the standards.
The baseline from which the standards will be applied must be clearly de-
fined so  that subsequent actions may be quantified for evaluation.

       2.  Adequate background knowledge is required for use in evaluation
of  potential sites and for reliable design calculations.

       3.  Background information in specific areas is necessary for the
observation of potential changes or damage that may incur as the result of
man's  use of the  lake.

       There are data  in the literature, and being developed,  that describe
the overall lake characteristics such as major  circulation patterns, tem-
perature regimes, biological characteristics, and aquatic inhabitants.  In
addressing the  problem of thermal  discharges, however, we are concerned
with the  near-shore regions and their specific characteristics, and the ways
in  which they differ from the lake norm and from other regions with which
they might be compared.

A.  Physical Characteristics

       This  section describes ambient data,  relevant to Lake Michigan,
published since  1970.   The  summaries are organized with  respect to geo-
graphical areas associated with existing power-plant sites.

       1.   Lake Temperatures

            Ambient lake temperatures have been measured periodically in
the Zion- Waukegan area since 1969-  Reference 12 presents data in graphical
form that shows  the near-shore temperature distribution as a function of
depth.  Some of the most pertinent features of the  data include the  spatial
variability of the temperatures and the documentation of the thermocline.
For instance, an ambient temperature profile obtained in August 1970, east
of the  Waukegan  Harbor, shows12 the temperature  decreasing from 64.4 to
50°F between the depths of 13 and  16 ft.  The ambient surface temperatures
near shore were observed to vary  from 62.6°F at Zion to 65.5°F at Waukegan
Harbor,  a distance of 4 miles.  The ambient  surface  temperature  also in-
creased  in the  offshore direction to over 70°F at a.  distance of 6 miles.  This
was apparently an upwelling condition.

-------
            The Bio-Test Laboratories reported   that ambient temperature
differences  of as much as  3.6°F in 980 ft made it difficult to clearly define
the perimeter of the thermal plume at Waukegan.

            A graphical representation 7 of ambient lake temperatures on
February 16,  1971, 2000 ft south of the Waukegan Generating Station, shows
that, except for  a very small region at a depth of about  12 ft, the temperature
is essentially uniform at 32 to 32.5°F at all depths to an offshore distance of
16,000 ft. On March 10, 1971, all top-to-bottom temperatures were deter-
mined to be 32.0°F.  8  Ambient temperatures measured on June  2, 1971,
showed 9 weak stratification with inshore heating.  Inshore surface tempera-
tures were  52-53°F; 2 miles offshore the surface temperature was 47°F, and
the bottom temperature at a depth  of 45 ft was 41°F.

            Water-temperature measurements ' at Zion, during April-
December  1971,  ranged from  37.8  to 72.5°F, the lowest in April and the
highest in August.  The thermal behavior of the Zion-Waukegan  area was
summarized as  follows:

            "Generally, inshore water temperatures were somewhat
higher than offshore during the spring and fall, while the reverse was
true in summer months.  A thermal bar was observed in April and
December near  the offshore (sampling) stations  (approximately  two  miles
from shore).

            "The spring overturn continued until early June, when the
thermocline appeared, ... . Thermal  stratification began in June at  the
Waukegan station.  However, the thermocline was  not observed at the
Zion area until early July.  The height of summer stratification was found
in August and disappeared during the  mid-September sampling period as
fall mixing  began in the area."69

            Average monthly water temperatures for the Waukegan,  Chicago
and Milwaukee water intakes are compared in Fig. 2.5 of Ref. 26.

            Lake temperatures at  several stations near the Point Beach
Nuclear Plant were me.asured, starting in April 1969.  There was a  general
slow warming trend from April through July, reaching the high 60's, with
only moderate temperature fluctuations.  However, in August and September,
upwelling conditions produced temperature fluctuations of greater than 20°F
in several days.  The  maximum and minimum temperatures  during  August
were 71 and 46°F, respectively.  From August 4 to August 9, the temperature
at the intake dropped from 68 to 48°F.126

            Temperature data obtained from April to December  1970 essen-
tially confirmed the 1969 data.127   Similar data obtained in 1971  showed a

-------
temperature high of only 63°F during mid-September.  This is about 8°F
lower than the highest temperatures observed during August in the  1969 and
1970 studies.  The large ambient-temperature fluctuations of up to  20°F ob-
served in 1969 and 1970 were not observed during 1971.l28

            During studies of a sinking plume,59 ambient lake temperatures,
at depths of 16-36 feet, were  observed at Point Beach and a station 2 miles
north during March  and April  1971. During March, the bottom temperature
increased slowly from  32 to 35°F,  with relatively little fluctuation.  From
April 3 to April 17,  it increased from 35 to 40°F with daily variations of up
to 3.6°F over periods of 3-6 hr.  Ambient-lake-temperature  measurements
at the Kewaunee site131"133 were  basically in agreement with  the  Point Beach
data for the same period.  The Kewaunee site is approximately 4.5  miles
north of the Point Beach site.

            On the eastern side of Lake Michigan, an ambient-lake-
temperature sensing and recording system was actuated at the Cook Plant
Site in May 1970.  Temperatures were measured at various depths  at both
300 and 2500 ft offshore.  Results of the  measurements obtained through
February 1971 are tabulated in Ref. 5.  The data consist of daily maximum
and minimum  water temperatures obtained at the Cook Plant  site and at the
Benton Harbor and St. Joseph water-plant intakes.

            Previously unreported data giving the average temperatures of
intake water during  1969 at the J. H. Campbell Plant at Port Sheldon,
Michigan, is presented in Ref. 119. The J. H. Campbell Plant is located
about 40 miles north of the Palisades  Plant.  These data showed a maxi-
mum temperature of 77°F in August and  variations  of up to 13°F within one
day.

            Average monthly water temperatures near the Bailly Generating
Station for October  1970 through September 1971 are tabulated in Ref.  120.
These data were obtained at the  Burns Harbor  Plant of the Bethlehem Steel
Company, immediately west of the Bailly site.

       2.   Inshore  Currents

            Inshore  currents are primarily wind driven and are therefore
quite variable, both spatially and temporally.  Relatively little inshore-
current data are available in the literature.

            On the west side of the lake, near the Point Beach site, current
velocity measurements were made at 20-min intervals during August to
October  1965, at a location 2 miles off the  coast of Sheboygan.  The data,
reported129 in terms of persistence, are shown in Table  1.

            Drogues were tracked on  three separate days in 1971, near the
Kewaunee  site, to observe the near-shore  currents.  Under calm conditions,

-------
                     Table  1
           Current Velocity Persistence
         Near Sheboygan, Wisconsin, 1965 129

Current (ft/sec)           Persistence _(%_ of time)

 0-0.5                              68
 0.6 - 0.7                          10
 0.8 - 0.9                          12
 1.0 or higher                      10

-------
preceded by a 5- 10-mph north wind, the drogues drifted south at an undeter-
mined velocity (due to fog).  Under the influence of offshore winds, a  drogue
500 ft offshore,  moved in an offshore direction (east) at 0.2 fps, and a drogue
200 ft offshore moved south at a speed of 0.4 fps.  With an onshore wind,  the
drogues moved shoreward and north at 0.16 fps.70

           Current measurements taken near the Zion site during 1969 were
reported to range  from 0.07 to  1.09 fps, with most values within 0.2-0.5 fps.26

           Measurements of inshore  lake currents in the Palisades Park,
Michigan, area61 are  summarized in the Palisades Environmental Report
(Revised).2   On the basis of wind records,  it was estimated that an along-
shore current flows northward about 33% of the time and southward about
23% of the time.  Offshore winds occur about 38% of  the time, but these are
expected to have a minimal effect close to shore and the along-shore cur-
rents should  tend  to persist, once set  up, while offshore winds  are blowing.
Thus, the frequency of along-shore current flow should be somewhat  greater
than cited above.

           The Bailly Environmental Report91 cites drogue studies
(unreferenced) as  showing that  surface currents (upper 5  ft) are directly
wind-driven and respond to wind shifts within 1 hr.  At the 5-ft depth, cur-
rents were skewed 27° to the  right of the prevailing mean wind.  Current
velocities in  the upper layer were measured to 1.6 fps. However, typical
velocities were  much less.

       3.  Thermal  Bar

           The "thermal-bar"  mechanism develops when waters reach a
temperature  associated with the maximum density of water (39-2°F).  As  the
surface waters warm in the spring, or cool  in the  winter, they eventually
achieve a temperature of 39.2°F and, being more dense than the surrounding
water, they tend to sink.  This downward flowing region of 39.2°F water,
called the thermal bar, is visualized as separating the inshore waters from
the mid-lake water.  The inshore waters are warmer than midlake water in
the spring  and cooler in the winter. During spring, the inshore side of the
thermal bar develops a thermociine separating the rapidly warming surface
water from the deeper, cold water.  Offshore of the-thermal bar, vertical
mixing extends from  the  surface to the bottom due to the absence of a ther-
mociine.  The thermal bar often exhibits turbidity and color gradients on
the lake surface at the point of  offshore and inshore  flow convergence.

           The thermal bar is not static.  Except for occasional shoreward
movement, its main movement  is from inshore to offshore until it eventually
disappears in midlake.  The thermal bar lasts for 4-8 weeks in Lake Ontario
(and Lake Michigan)  and is believed to be controlled by surface (solar) heat-
ing and the heat capacity of the lake.100

-------
           Ambient-temperature measurements have revealed the presence
of thermal bars on several occasions  in the Zion-Waukegan area. Bio-Test
studies12 of ambient lake temperatures, approximately 3 miles north of the
Waukegan Station, recorded the thermal bar on April 23, 1970, approximately
16,600 ft (3.1 miles) offshore.  Figure  1 is  a graphical representation of the
data and shows fairly uniform temperatures on one side  of the bar (39.2°F
isotherm) and thermal stratification on the other.  Ambient temperatures in
excess of 48°F were found near shore. On  April 30, 1970,  no  evidence of the
bar was found out to a distance  36,000 ft (6.8 miles).  The offshore velocity
for this particular observation was, therefore,  at least 0.53 mile/day.

           Water temperatures indicating  a weakly defined thermal bar
were observed on December 18, 1970.6l The bar was 29,920 ft offshore.
At 4250 ft to the east, or offshore side of the bar, the temperature was
39-6°F from top to bottom; 4260 ft to the west of the bar, the temperature
was 38.8°F. Measurements and analysis of water samples collected from
top, middle, and bottom depths, at both these locations, indicated no signi-
ficant differences in pH, chlorides,  conductivity and dissolved oxygen.
                                                                     / Q
           The spring thermal bar was again  observed and documented
on April 20 and May 3,  1971, in the  Zion-Waukegan area.  Offshore tempera-
ture transects  were made  from the  Zion site, the Waukegan plant, and a
point in between.  The bar was located 8000, 8000, and 5000 ft offshore, re-
spectively, at these three locations.  The bar was well defined with cooler
water to the east nearly isothermal from top to bottom, while  the inshore
water to the west  was well stratified,  with top  to bottom  temperatures
varying from 45 to 41°F.

           A comparison  of water-quality  samples taken 600 ft from the
bar, on both the inshore and  offshore sides, showed dissolved oxygen and
pH values to be similar.  However,  there was a tendency toward  lower
values for chlorides, conductance,  and turbidity in samples taken from the
offshore side, as compared with samples taken from the inshore  waters.

           Transects made  on May 3, 1971, at the  Zion  site and  at a point
between Zion and  Waukegan, showed the thermal bar to be  17,000 and
19,000 ft offshore, respectively. The  bar was  less  well defined,  with ther-
mal stratification less pronounced on the inshore side.  The average velocity
of movement offshore during this period was 0.12 mile/day at the Zion site
and 0.19 mile/day at the test area south of  Zion. No chemical measurements
were reported  during this  observation.

            The University of Michigan Willow Run Laboratories reported110
an aerial survey of the thermal-bar development, between Port Sheldon
(J. H. Campbell Plant) and Grand Haven, Michigan, between April 22 and
May 7, 1971.  The survey used an infrared  scanner to map surface-
temperature regimes and a scanning spectrometer  to measure "apparent"

-------
o
•H
t-l
O,
cn

-------
                                   10


water-quality variations, primarily in terms of different reflectance spectra.
The report includes a number of pictures of the  results.

           On April 23, the studies revealed significant shoreline heating
but no indication of a thermal bar.  The imagery obtained April 30 showed
a very distinct thermal bar approximately 1^ to 2 miles offshore.   On May 7,
the bar  had moved about 4 miles offshore.110 Thus, the average offshore
velocity was  about 0.3 mile/day during this period.

           Any interaction between the Campbell  Plant plume on the
Grand River  plume and the thermal bar was not clearly evident.   The plume
of the Grand  River  appeared to be much larger than the Campbell Plant
plume,  on both the thermal images and the multispectral images.

           The reduced multispectral data show water masses with dif-
ferent spectral characteristics (differences in color, turbidity, etc.).  Water
on the inshore side of the thermal bar had decidedly different characteristics
than the offshore water.  Also, the water masses associated with  the
Grand River  had rather sharply defined boundaries, whereas the Campbell
Plant water-mass boundaries were  ill-defined.  "In general, there was very
little  mixing  of water masses on the shore side  of the bar.  Since the  wind
on this  particular day was less than 5 mph, this was not surprising."110

           The data of May 7, under somewhat  stronger wind conditions,
indicate a considerable amount of mixing on the inshore side of the bar.
Again, there  was no apparent indication of the Grand River or  Campbell
Plant plumes interacting with the thermal bar.   (It was 2 miles further off-
shore.) "The map of different water masses along the shore for May 7 em-
phasizes the  complex environment in Lake Michigan and the danger of
drawing conclusions  from only a  small number of samples.

           "Observing the results from the two dates (April 30 and May 7)
we note that  there is not a characteristic water  mass  traceable solely to the
existence of  the power plant plume, while the plume of the Grand  River is
distinctly outlined and the boundary of the thermal bar is also evident.  That
an algae growth difference (and,  therefore,  spectral differences) across the
thermal bar  exists has been documented and reported by Stoermer.    The
outfall  of the Grand River is also known to contain nutrients, pollutants, and
sediments which characterize its color.  Since the power plant discharges
water that has been recycled with only heat added, it seems reasonable to
expect  no change in the water's spectral characteristics."110

           Rodgers has reported on thermal-bar measurements  in
Lake Ontario during the  spring of 197 O.101  Weekly temperature profiles
were measured at 30-60 stations from May 11 to June 24,  1970.   Calcula-
tions of heat-content changes in  various portions of lake water (due to
surface heating, advection, etc.) indicated higher than average heat-content

-------
                                   11
changes near the thermal bar.  "Very large positive heat content changes
take place  in the middle of the lake during the last one to two weeks, in the
presence of the thermal bar,  associated with small, even negative changes
in heat content along the north shore. It is with a reasonable degree of con-
fidence that it can be said that.the differences in heat content change
(between shore and mid-lake) in the  latter stages must be due to offshore
advection of heat."101

            The speed of movement of the thermal bar was inversely cor-
related with the slope of the lake bottom.  Between  May 11 and June  8, the
thermal bar moved away from the north shore of Lake Ontario at an average
speed of 0.43 mile/day.  The  speed away from the south shore was 0.22 mile/
day. During the week of May 19-25,  however, the bar actually moved shore-
ward by a distance of 1^ to 2  miles.   "Clearly, there are substantial  pertur-
bations in the  general offshore progression  of the bar."  01

            In a study of the effect of the thermal bar on the concentration
of several  chemicals in Lake Ontario, Weiler and Coker,123 during May 1970,
measured pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, calcium,  alkalinity, inorganic
carbon, total phosphorous, chlorophyl _a, silicon, nitrate-nitrogen, and trace
metals on both sides of the  bar.  They summarized their results as follows:
"Discriminant analysis shows waters inside and outside the bar are  chemi-
cally distinct with respect to  some of the nutrients.  These differences  in
nutrients are  caused by the greater biological activity in the warmer waters
inshore of the bar.  However, the bar apparently has no effect on the water
composition as far as the major ions are concerned. The evidence for  the
trace elements is not conclusive."123

            The role of the  thermal bar in containing health-oriented bac-
teria to the inshore area was investigated in two preliminary studies in
Lake Ontario during  May 15-22, 1970.83  By measuring coliform,  fecal coli-
form, bacterial biomass and  20°C plate  counts in one test, and measuring
the diffusion of a tracer bacteria, Serratia marcescens, Menon e_t al. con-
cluded that "sufficient data  have been collected to suggest that the thermal
                                                                   o T>
bar has significant effect on the  distribution of bacteria in the lake."

            They also stated, however, "The single recovery of
S_. marcescens, although suggestive,  is not sufficient evidence to  support
our hypothesis of the thermal bar's barrier effect to the offshore movement
of bacteria. One possibility which must be considered is -whether or not the
offshore movement of the thermal bar is greater than the diffusion rate of
the tracer organism.  If such was the case,  the diffusion of the tracer or-
ganism would  never be affected by the thermal bar  and eventually would be
dilutedbeyond recovery."   Furthermore, the tests  were not made in the
absence of the thermal bar for purposes of comparison.

-------
                                   12
B.  Biological Characteristics

       In aquatic ecosystems there are natural fluctuations both spatially
and temporally, in biota and physicochemical conditions.  In addition, there
is a natural progression of lakes toward eutrophication.  To distinguish be-
tween changes due to natural factors and those due to man,  it  is necessary
to acquire and analyze data, both before and after  man's activities, in suf-
ficient quantity and quality to allow such determinations  to be made.

       Reference 5 provides an elementary summary of the Lake Michigan
ecology.   "Although Lake Michigan is showing signs  of eutrophication and
major  changes have  occurred in the fish populations, the lower levels of the
food chainappear to be relatively unchanged from that  generally described by
BersaminI5in 1958 ... .  The productivity of fish population is highly depend-
ent on  the productivity of crustaceans in this lake.  A generalized food  chain
for Lake Michigan would be:  production of green algae,  primarily diatoms,
which are grazed by crustacean zooplankters.  These crustaceans are in
turn grazed on by plankton feeders, which include  nearly every species of
fish in Lake Michigan, at least during some phase of their life history.
Many of these fish species later become piscivorous (fish eating) and feed
on other  fish species when they reach a certain size." 19  Figure 2 depicts
the general trophic structure for the lake at present.

       1.   Fish

            The recent history of Lake Michigan has seen a drastic species
change in the fish population. A summary of the commercial  production50
from 1879 to 1968 shows a drastic reduction in lake  trout, lake white fish,
and lake  herring, fluctuations in smelt, and an increase in bloater and par-
ticularly in alewives.

            Historically, the Lake Michigan offshore waters had  a fish popu-
lation  dominated by lake trout, lake white fish,  lake  herring, bloater, and
burbot.  Brown and rainbow trout were also present, but these normally used
streams  for spawning, and it was there that most were available to sports
fishermen.  In the shallower, inshore waters, the white fish, lake herring,
yellow perch, a number  of species of small suckers, minnows, and darters
were found.  All  of these fishes were subject to substantial year-class fluc-
tuations  due to natural causes, such as very successful or unsuccessful
spawns,  species  competition, and species interactions.

            In about 1936 the predatory sea lamprey was introduced into
Lake Michigan from below Niagara Falls.  Predation by the sea  lamprey,
added  to that of man, reduced the population of large fish such as lake trout
and the lake white fish to a point where commercial lake-trout fishing was
virtually abandoned.  The  alewife and smelt were  also introduced, and with
the top predators having been reduced by predation, the  alewife exploded
into huge population densities in the mid-601 s.

-------
13

                                                                    c
                                                                    tt)
                                                                    00
                                                                   •H
                                                                   £1
                                                                    O
                                                                   •H
                                                                   g

                                                                    cu
                                                                    o

                                                                    0)
                                                                    O
                                                                    3
                                                                    J-l
                                                                    a.
                                                                    o
                                                                    OJ


                                                                    4J
                                                                    01
                                                                    •a
                                                                    o
                                                                    o
                                                                    •H
                                                                    0)
                                                                    .c
                                                                    o
                                                                    Crt

                                                                    •a
                                                                    0)
                                                                    N
                                                                    c
                                                                    OJ
                                                                    o
                                                                     C>0
                                                                    •H

-------
                                   14
            In the late 60's the coho salmon was introduced into the system
as a top predator.  It is now a locally important sport fish.  More recently,
other predators such as chinook salmon, sockeye salmon, steelhead, splake
(a trout hybrid), and lake trout have apparently been successfully stocked.
Some fish taken recently show signs of scarring, indicating that the lamprey
is still present, although reduced by the many control methods.

            A thorough summary of the life  histories, migratory patterns,
spawning habits, temperature preferences, etc., of the principal  fish of
Lake Michigan is presented in Appendix V-2 of the final Environmental
Statement of the Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant.119  Table 2 summarizes
the ecology of some of the important Lake Michigan fish.

            In the immediate Zion-Waukegan area, commercial fishing was
reported to be nonexistent.26 Historical records of catch activity indicate
that most fishing takes place 9 miles or more offshore.  Fish that are  com-
mercially important in the general area are bloaters, yellow perch, and
smelt.  Forage fish, which also inhabit the area, are important to the sup-
port of both the sport  and  commercial fisheries. The most abundant is the
alewife.  Sport fishing in this area is very popular.2

            Commercial fishermen have reported 21 fish species near the
Zion area.  Of these,  15 species were captured by gill nets  and minnow
seining  during field tests by Bio-Test Laboratories between March and
October  1970.   Seventeen species were collected from  April through
December 1971 by minnow seining in the inshore areas in conjunction with
studies  of the Waukegan station intake and discharge.72

            The two most abundant fishes taken during the 1970 test period
were the alewife and the yellow perch.  Other fairly common specimens were
the smelt, bloater, and spottail shiner-26'73  The coho salmon was the most
frequently taken salmonid game fish.  Statistical data on the weight, length
and sex of the various species versus location of capture are given in
Ref. 73.  In a number  of instances, particularly for the alewife, spottail
shiner,  smelt, and yellow perch,, considerably more females than males
were taken from the inshore areas at both Waukegan and Zion.  Immature
individuals were most commonly taken along the shoreline.73

            The most abundant  species near Zion during the 1971 tests were
the alewife and  spottail shiner.   Emerald shiners, bloaters, longnose dace,
and smelt were present in low numbers intermittently throughout the sum-
mer and fall of 1971.72

            Stomach-content data for  fish collected in the Zion-Waukegan
area were summarized in Table VIII of Ref.  73.  The salmonids fed most
frequently on forage fishes, especially alewives. Amphipods, probably
Pontoporeia affinis, were important food items  for the white sucker,

-------
                                                            15
 Cn
_O

"o
 U
W
 3
 O
to
•o
 o
 o
u*
      c
      o
     s.
 6.   S
         V
         (J

         C
      p.
      o
 >i    O
k   N
              0
                                               •8
                                                id
                                        w   4)
                                        u   id
                                        V   >
                                        (D   hi
                                        C   id
         "    j  
                 01  i*  O  *J
        oo
              a.
              t
              0)
              Q
         U)
         id
        >S    "3
        T3    T3
        -I    <
         n
         0)
        • (H
         U
         0)
         (X
x:
(0
u.
c
(0
PT\
*j>
2
u
2
0)
^
(0
iJ
41
C
10
41
u,
o
a
E
0)
E
o
CO
*^

•f i
0 _
3 0
BO id ao
S £ 41
•^ « id
* BS
> S
£ 5





M
h4 «
.. 41
i^ id
c ^
*^
> CL
# 0)
01
Q
««



0)
X!
•*->
a
V
•a
m
00












                                       o  w
                                       o «
                                       u  id
                                        (X
                                        o>
                                        v
                                       Q
                                                id

                                                01
                                                id


                                                a
                                                01
                                                01
                                                Q
                                                        00

                                                        4-»
                                                        id
                                                        -H  a

                                                        2 J3
                                                        O 4J
                                                        x;  a.
                                                        U  V
                                                    w
                                                          ' rvj
                                                1-1  *3  *i  ^
                                                o)  a  * >«
                                                S  "   »  °
                                                5  -a   ?  „
                                                ^      w  -S
                                                ^  «   c  c
                                                ^  —'   C  rt
                                        X  c  3  C
                                        CO  -S  u  n)
                                        3
                                        T3
                                         01
                                        •i-4
                                        >«

                                         01
C M
0 3
5 2
c g
-1
0. J
0 «
o Q
E
o
u
id
•H
Q
•
id


a
01
0)
Q
                                                                         id


                                                                         (X
                                                                         o>
                                                                         v
                                                                         Q
                                                                 n)

                                                                 a
                                                                 o>
                                                                  £  a~ Ui

                                                                  S  -'V
                                                                 ^•^7
                                                                     4lO
                                                                   •  id •*
                                                                  "-     M
                                                                  oi  *-
                                                                  41  ^> 41
                                                                  id  ^)  id

                                                                  "  H  5
                                                                  a. o>
                                                                  oi  u
                                                                  0)  V
                                                                 Q  Q -a
                                                                 3
                                                                 •o
                                                                  o
                                                                  u
                                                                  10

                                                                 U
               BO  id
               C £  *
               id "O  t>
               «  2  '2
               u  O. O
               rt  O  C
               5 T!  id
               a  o  ^4
               3  >^ id
               Sou
               U
 oo  id     M
 c  £  *  -3
 •d  T> -O  .2
 *>  2 '«  o
 U  A  O  M
    o!
        id
                                                                                                    id   °  e "*
                                                                                                    2  r,  id •«
                                                                                                       u  u 3;     ^
:•:
oo  in
<4H  41
 o  id
.-4  01
 §4^^
x;  ao
 
                            3
                                                                                                                       i
                                                                                                                      CM
                                                                                                                      OI
                                                                                                                      CM
                                                                                                               C
                                                                                                               0
                                                                                                               4-c  (-.

                                                                                                                      O  c
                                                    -a  .2
                                                     3
                                                     41   ~
                                                    CO-

                                                     U  10
                                                     -a,
                                                     Q.  .
                                                     O  41
                                                     >,co
                                                     c
                                                    CO   "

                                                    <  10
                                                        a

                                                     5^
 i-J C
 -D S

 S2


 ciS
   . CM
 w   .
                                                                                                                      C 3
                                                                                                                      O CO
                                                                                                                      l/l
                                                                                                                      u
                                                                                                                      ai x:
                                                                                                                      T> u
                                                                                                                      c ai
                                                                                                                      < H

-------
                                                        16
4)
O
14
3
O
to
•o
o
0
u<
Principle




T3
C
n)

4)
a
>
t.
J5
4-*
U
4)
(0
»— 4
b
•us
«
fc

9
C <4 i
Nymphs
Cladocera
Daphnia
Sida
Halopedi
"8
g-21'
S •" M
Isl
<


•
"0
a
«
CU
u .-
u 41
Sphaeridai
Water mit



a u
"§ 3
a •*
O 4)
£<
^ "*•''
n X
•O «
3~~
2 s x
£ <4 4>
• £ E
Owe/)


c

i-H
(4
.2
« £
!
4) w
a e
0 0
U a,
>
i
(0
Mysis
Gastropod

*j

t*
4)
^
(4
O
«
ai TJ
Sphaeridai
Sculpin an
Eggs


4)


E
n)


a
4)
           «>
£



IU
>
>
J
O
•—I
"rt
x:
in


4-»
O
c
In
1)
4-*
ID
a
4)
41
Q


^*
c
n)
-C
4^

(0
n
4)
. — i




—
0
vO
q
(4

                                                                                         P  >n
                                                                          13  £  a
                                                                          5      w
                                                                              C  T3
                                                                          ^  5  _

                                                                          2  *  °
                                                                          ^  CU QO
,rt    5
                                                                          V*

                                                                          4)
       a.
       4)
       4)
      Q
                                                                          IX
                                                                          4)
                                                                          41

                                                                         Q
 4)
 QC

 n)
 at    3
"3    -o
-I    <
                                                                                                n
                                                                                                4)
                                                                 C
                                                                 4)
                                                                          3
                                                                         T3
 u
 41
 a
       a,
                                                                          n)
                                                                          O
                                                                          i—4

                                                                          ffl

-------
                                                  17
V
u
h
0
to
•o
rinciple Foo
(X



01
quatic insect
<




rustaceans
U




Copepods

0
3
>-,
R)
E
«|4
Cladocerans
Mysis
mphipods - G«
2
4)
b
0
a
0
*j
c
o
(X



otifers
< a




ladocerans
U




opepods
U




in
00
00
V
~H
13
co



to
4)
N
•r-«
10
•— <
13
"4-1
O
£
01
£
                                                                           00 I
                                                                          • «H I
                                                                           col
                                                                                01

                                                                                n)
                                                                                4)
                                                                                u
                                                                               u
                                                                                       C
                                                                                       a
                                                                                      "3
                                                                                       u
                                                                                      tn
                                                                                   2  E
 E
 £
 3
to
     rt


     O.
                                                        p..1   £

                                                        S§  fr
                                                       P  -  T3






^_^
T9
4)
3
g
4J

0
o

00
C
1*
a
to









(-.
(U
c
4)
4J
nl
^
?
?
0
13
A
to



IH
0)
4-»
rt
£
5
01
£
rt
41
t,
4-*
01
T>
C
n)









00
^
n)
Df
01
^
O
^4-*











U^
)
0
in
4->
nl









                                                               h
                                                        K    °0
                                                        «!  -   S
                                                        rt  g  «
                                                        *  2  «
                                                        «  rsj   4)

                                                       Q  -  T3
                                                        H     O
                                                        « .   in

                                                        rt 2  -
A
 rt
H
       rt

      CO
                                                         ,
                                                        W  
-------
                                  18
sculpins, and the one -white fish that was collected.  Although Pontoporeia
has been reported as an important food for alewives and occurs commonly
in the area, it was not heavily used by the alewives captured in the study.
Shoreline minnows, white suckers, and smelt fed heavily on chironomid
larvae.  Yellow perch and smelt fed more frequently on forage fish in the
Waukegan area than at Zion.  Zooplankton (cladocerans and copepods) were
used by more fish at Waukegan than at Zion, except for the alewife.73

            The relative frequency of fish eggs in the stomachs of nine
species showed a rather wide utilization of fish eggs for food.  The fish eggs
were probably the eggs of more than one species, since they were found over
such a long period, from March through October.  Alewives, smelt,  and
perch were found in the  area during their  anticipated time of spawning, and
the eggs of these species were  probably among those commonly found in the
stomachs.

            Reference 1Z2 states  "Although no direct data  exist,  it is ques-
tionable if the waters  off the Zion site could provide grounds suitable for
spawning of any fish on a large scale due to the ever-present scouring
action of waves.  Spawning presumably occurs in protected harbors  where
there are quiet waters."  Bureau  of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife records42
for various fish spot-checked by trawling at 3-40 fathom depths off  Waukegan
from  1967  to 1971 (October, November, April  and May) suggest that, except
for smelt,  alewife and bloater,  the ratio of young to adult is much less than
50%.122

            Plankton net tows have shown that this area does not contain
significant amounts of either fish larvae  or pelagic fish eggs, yet analysis
of stomach contents suggests that spawning of some species may take place. 3

            Supplement  IV of the  Zion Environmental Impact Report27 states,
"Based on preoperational monitoring accomplished thus far, it appears
fairly certain that spawning grounds for lake trout and white fish do not
exist in the Zion area.  Preoperational studies have shown that adults of
these species are absent from the predicted area of discharge during spawn-
ing season. "

            Recent collections by state fisheries and game personnel have
shown the  species of fish listed in Table 3 to be present at the Point Beach
and Kewaunee area.98 This was confirmed by gill-net sampling by Bio-Test
Laboratories in 197 I.70

            The most abundant sport fish  found in the area during 1971 was
the lake trout.70  Virtually all had been stocked in Wisconsin waters by
Federal or State agencies,  as indicated by their clipped fins.  The bulk of
the fish taken were  year-class V  (1966) fish.  They were  predominant in the
spring and fall; year-class III and IV fish were more in evidence during the
summer months.

-------
                         19
ee Site
Longnose suckers
              1
               ^
               0)
              PQ
                     rt
                     u
Suckers
a
te

£
+->
CTS
(D
per
         
•^
Q
•a
•H
"3
(X

^
2
4^

•g
o
rH
PQ

-P
3
2
p

s
rH
PQ

•P
3
O
rH
P
0)
3
l-J

c
^
rt
LO
o
•§
u

-------
                                   zo
           Stomach analysis of the lake trout revealed alewives comprised
57%, by volume, of the total food items.  Other items included smelt, shiners,
and sculpins.  A large number were taken with empty stomachs.  This oc-
curred during October 1971, when they were near spawning conditions.70

           Reference 129 states there are  no known spawning or nursery
grounds for fish in the area of the Point Beach Power Plant site.  Samples
taken from the Point  Beach discharge flume by the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources, between March and May 1971, resulted in a total catch
of eight sculpin, two samples with a "few" smelt eggs, and one  possible
salmonid egg. 29

           During a  3-yr period (1968-1970) of pre ope rational surveys
conducted by the State of Michigan  in the area of the Palisades Plant,
28 species of fish  were ca'pturecUby gill netting, seining,  or trawling.  Gill-
net catches were dominated by alewives (55%) and yellow perch (39%).
Shoreline seining disclosed a predominance of longnose dace and spottail
shiners. Aside from alewives, the trawl catches were composed princi-
pally of smelt, trout, perch, and bloaters.  Among the salmonids, the total
catch for 3 yr was 32 lake trout, 8 coho salmon, and 10 chinook salmon,
nearly all of which were from plantings made at nearby Port Sheldon and
New Buffalo.96  There were significant diurnal differences in the catches.

           Perch was the most abundant game fish sampled throughout the
summer and fall.  Since no young-of-the-year perch were captured, it was
postulated that they were inhabiting the zone 3- 18 ft deep, an area that was
not sampled.96 Very few adult alewives were taken in the inshore area dur-
ing daytime seining, but large numbers were captured at night  on
May 14,  1970.

            Bloaters were the only species of Coregonus caught in any
abundance during  the 3-yr period.  Only four lake herring  were taken
during the test period.

            A Great Lakes Fishery Laboratory cruise report1  described
fishing to locate spawning grounds of lake trout and white fish in south-
eastern Lake Michigan.   "Catches (during November  1971) of ripe, spent,
and gravid female lake trout in several areas off Benton Harbor (D. C. Cook
Plant site), South  Haven (Palisades Plant site), and Saugatuck suggest that
this species  spawned in large numbers along the entire  southeastern shore
of Lake Michigan.  All males were in spawning condition.  Of 183 fish over
23  inches long, 31% had healed lamprey scars and 1.1% had fresh wounds.

            "The only whitefish taken were a single female off New Buffalo
and 6 ripe males off  Saugatuck.  The evidence ...  suggests that whitefish
spawn in suitable  locations (probably mostly reefs) along the southeastern

-------
                                  21
Lake Michigan shore, but not in great numbers.  Fairly large catches of
lake trout were made off New Buffalo and Saugatuck in the December nets.
Nearly all were males."19

           Fish, taken inshore at the Bailly Plant site (September 19-20,
1970) by seining, included about 200 yellow perch, less than 3 in. long,  sev-
eral small bluegills, two small largemouth bass, and several species of
unidentified minnows.91  Fish taken in gill nets included 88 yellow perch,
two white suckers,  and one  longnose  sucker.  Yellow-perch age groups were
III, IV, V, and VI with twice as many females as males.  The perch were
feeding primarily on crayfish (from extensive areas of rip-rapping in the
area) and other fish.

           Additional fish  data specific to the Cook Plant area are given
in Ref. 65.  A tabulation of  the 1970 catch data for game fish taken off of
Berrien  County, Michigan (site of the Cook Plant), revealed the following
abundance percentages:  smelt, 62%; perch, 31%; chinook salmon, 6%; and
trout (lake, brown,  rainbow, and  steelhead), 4%.

       2.  Plankton

           Generally, Lake Michigan has low algae populations compared
with those of most  surface  waters, with centric diatoms predominating.14
During the summer, however,  the southeast sector of the  lake  contains
algae close to the shoreline of the type commonly found in eutropic situa-
tions.87   There is an apparent relationship between the areas of the lake
shore,  where nuisance algae occur, and the proximity of sources of plant
nutrients contributed by major tributaries.119

           The background data on plankton in the Zion-Waukegan area were
summarized  as follows:26

           "Water samples for plankton counts  were collected in the Zion
area in April  1968, and in August, October and December 1969, and monthly
since.  Despite a problem in comparing population because different  sam-
pling techniques were used, the species of plankton identified in the spring
of 1968 were similar to those of 1969 and subsequent studies ... .

           "In August  1969, the  plankton population near  Zion was composed
of green algae, blue-green  algae, diatoms,  protozoans, and crustaceans with
the diatoms usually comprising more than  80 percent of the total plankton.
This plankton population was not evenly distributed in the water column but
was most numerous at the  15 to 20 foot depth.

           "In October  1969, the total plankton population was similar in
composition to that observed in August.  Diatoms usually comprised  more
than 75 percent of the  total  plankton population at all depths sampled. In

-------
                                  22
addition to members of the genera Fragilaria and Tabellaria,  species of
Asterionella were observed more frequently in the October  samples. Al-
though temperatures were similar throughout the water column, the plankton
populations were most numerous at the 10 to  13 foot depth.

            "Plankton samples taken during December,  1969, were obtained
from a much wider section of the lake than earlier samples and are there-
fore believed to more accurately represent the existing population.  Most of
the samples were taken between the 5 and 15 foot depths, ....   The total
population was composed of the same planktonic forms observed in August
and October, 1969; however, the diatoms  comprised more than 90 percent
of the population (rather than 75 percent). The diatoms Tabellaria and
Fragilaria were still represented; however, species of Stephanodiscus re-
placed Asterionella as a dominant form.

            "The 1970 and 1971 studies to determine the thermal effects on
both phytoplankton and zooplankton found  in the Waukegan area produced
comparable data on planktonic population to those in the Zion  study. With
respect to phytoplankton, these more extensive studies confirmed earlier
observations and led to the conclusion that most species encountered were
classical  to Lake Michigan, however, the diatom Stephanodiscus hantzschii-
tenuis  was a notable exception. It was found to be the most dominant species
in April, May and June  and has been associated with organic enrichment
(Stoermer and Kopczynska,112  1967).71 This species also represents more
than 5  percent of the August and September populations."26

            It should be noted that the relative abundance of diatoms meas-
ured by the Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories in the Zion-Waukegan area  in
August, October, and December 1969 (80, 75, and 90%, respectively), con-
trasts  sharply with the  data  of Schelske and Stoermer,107 which indicated
that diatoms comprised  10% of the phytoplankton samples taken from the
midlake part of southern Lake Michigan during the summer of 1969.

            A more detailed reporting69 of plankton samples obtained in the
Zion-Waukegan area from April to  December  1971 revealed the following:
Chrysophyta (golden-brown algae) was the most abundant algae division.
Diatoms,  the most numerous of which were Fragilaria crotonensis,
Stephanodiscus binderanus, S^.  hantzschii- tenuis, Rhizosolenid eriensis ,
Asterionella formosa, and Tabellaria flocculosa,  comprised more than 90%
of the  April-August population, about 50% of the September-October popula-
tion, and  more than 70% of the November-December population.  The Cyano-
phyta (blue-green algae) was the second most abundant, the percentages
rangingfrom 0.2 to 42% of the phytoplankton.  Chlorophyta (green algae) had
an abundance of 0.2-7.6% of the total phytoplankton.

            The largest standing crops of diatoms were observed in April,
May, and June when temperatures were below 56°F,  with inshore waters

-------
                                   23


containing more than offshore waters.  The temperatures at this time were
above what is considered optimum for several of the dominant species.

            Comparison of Chrysophyta populations with the concentrations
of silicon dioxide, total phosphate, and  nitrate-nitrogen revealed (a) that
silica increased gradually in the spring and then declined concurrently with
decreasing diatom populations during August  (the quantity of silica generally
declines as  diatom populations increase), (b)  total phosphates decreased
gradually from June through October, and minimum amounts coincided with
the fewest diatoms, (c) nitrate-nitrogen remained  uniform from May through
September and increased during the fall (this may be attributed to a reduced
uptake of nitrates by phytoplankton during a period of minimum population
growth).69

            The blue-green algae  comprised less than 5% of the phytoplank-
ton from April through August 1971. However,  from September through
December, percentages at various sampling locations varied from  11 to 67%
of the phytoplankton, primarily due to an increase of Collosphaerium
naegelianum.  It was noted that blue-green  algae populations  did not exceed
25% of the total during the 1970-1971 study.

            Zooplankton data acquired by the  Industrial Bio-Test Labora-
tories were summarized2  as follows: "Additional data on zooplankton, also
obtained in 1970 and 1971 studies,  revealed that the most common classes
present in Lake Michigan near the Zion station were copepods, cladocerans
and to a  lesser extent, rotifers.  The most  abundant zooplankton crustacean
in Lake Michigan, the  Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi, was found to be the
dominant species representing the copepods.  Other common copepods  ...
were Eurytemora affinis (present in large numbers in September and
October), Cyclops vernalis (quite  common in  October and present in low
numbers in  September), and Diaptomus ashlundi (found  in moderate numbers
in January and December and again only in significant numbers in
September).  The most abundant Cladocera throughout the study was found
to be the Bosmina longirostris. Daphnia retrocurva and Ceriodaphnia
quadrangula were also present in  significant numbers in August. Rotifers
were represented predominantly by Conochilus  and Asplanchna
priodonta ... . "2

            A more detailed reporting69 of zooplankton studies in 1971 stated
that a seasonal variation was  clearly observed.  "The major portion of the
zooplankton community was composed of copepods during the  spring months.
Then, with the higher water temperatures of July through September, the
cladocerans predominated.  As the water temperature decreased, the
copepods again predominated."69

            Plankton samples obtained  at the  Kewaunee site in 197 I70 re-
vealed that diatoms were the most abundant members of the phytoplankton,

-------
                                  24
followed by blue-green algae and green algae.  The diatoms were most
abundant in May (91%),  and the fewest numbers were observed in November
(66%).  Blue-green algae comprised 2-26% of the population, the lowest and
highest values occurring during May and November,  respectively.  The
larger counts were due  to an increase in Coelosphaerium naegelianum.
Green algae and miscellaneous forms always accounted for less than 8% of
the total.  These results are similar to the Zion studies.

           The five most abundant  species were Fragilaria pinnata,
F. crotonesis, Tabellaria flocculosa, Coelosphaerium naegelianum, and
Stephanodiscus hantzschii-tenuis. All are diatoms except the blue-green
algae C. naegelianum.

           Zooplankton samples were obtained in the Point Beach and
Kewaunee areas by The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee1    8 and  at
Kewaunee by Bio-Test Laboratories.70  The Bio-Test data identified  13
species of cladocerans, 11 species of copepods, and two immature stages
of copepods during 1971.  This included  small numbers of five genera not
reported in The Univer sity of Wisconsin  data of 196912  and three genera not
reported in the 1971 data.128

            The most numerous species identified in the Bio-Test studies
at Kewaunee  were Bosmina longerostris, Chydorus  sphaericus, Cyclops
bicuspidatus  thomasi, and two species of Daphnia; The University of
Wisconsin data from Point Beach and Kewaunee listed Bosmina, Cyclops,
Diaptomus, Daphnia and rotifers as the  most abundant.  Both studies  found
numerous copepod nauplii.  The rotifer  population was reported to be much
higher in 1971 than in 1969 and  197 O.128'70

           Dr. Ayers conducted limnological  studies at the Cook Plant site
in 1969 and 1970.  On July 10, 1970, phytoplankton samples were obtained
at 53 stations.  The  53 samples contained 59 dominant or  codominant (six
stations had two species of approximately equal numerical superiority)
groups, of which 49  were diatoms.7  The number of samples in which the
various species were dominant are  Tabellaria fenestrata  (32), Cyclotella sp.
(seven), Milosira  sp. (six), and  Fragilaria  crotonensis (four).   The species
Milosira sp.  and Cyclotella sp. were most  dominant  in the surf zone, and
F.  crotonensis was more dominant  in stations farthest offshore.

            The investigators made the  following comments concerning
their data:5

            a.   "There appears to  be an increase (in numbers of species,
                at least) of blue-green algae from spring into fall.

            b.   Green  algae appears  to have a peak in late  summer that
                may or may not be supported by subsequent data.

            c.   The persistence of flagellates is unexpected and may or
                may not be supported by subsequent data."

-------
                                   25
           Examining their data for river-associated phytoplankters, they
concluded that the evidence from the July 10 survey shows no demonstrable
effect of the St.  Joseph River on the Cook Plant phytoplankton.7

           Variations from station to  station in the diversity index, number
of species, and organism density, during the July 10, 1970, tests forced them
to conclude "that small water masses,  each with different biotic characteris-
tics, move through the Cook Plant area."7

           Zooplankton data obtained on July 10, 1970, also  indicated a
patchiness from station to station,  but  it was not as pronounced as phyto-
plankton patchiness.  Although the Cyclopoid copepods were occasionally
present in the greatest numbers, Bosmina cladocerans dominated the  sam-
ples most frequently.  The most abundant zooplankters had the following
sample frequencies:  Cyclopoid copepods (eight),  Diaptomus  copepods (none),
Bosmina cladocerans (37), Polyphemus cladocerans (two), and Asplanchna
rotifers (none).7

           Copeland and Ayers34 provide an interpretation of biological data
obtained during  lakewide  sampling  during 1969 and 1970.  "Inspection  of the
phytoplankton data  tends to confirm the general trends  observed in other
studies.  In general, total phytoplankton abundance was greater  near the
south end of the lake and  near  shore than in the northern  end and in the  cen-
tral lake.  This  was the expected situation.  However, relative abundance of
the various algal groups did not follow the expected pattern.  In only about
half of the samples did diatoms represent more than half the algal cells
present.  Their  relative abundance was lowest at some of the open lake
stations, particularly toward the northern end. When diatom abundance was
low, the green algae usually were found to be high, and vice versa.  The
other groups tended to remain at rather low levels except for an occasional
peak in the blue-green's and dinoflagellates, but these peaks seldom repre-
sented more  than 50%  of total phytoplankton.  Since phytoplankton abundance
can  rise and  fall rather quickly, and since samples from  different stations
in this study were widely spaced in time, even within a single cruise,  it is
unwise to draw any more detailed conclusions from this data."

           Copeland and Ayers34 interpret zooplankton data  obtained during
lakewide sampling  in the  following manner.  "Comparison of the zooplankton
data with other studies is particularly  difficult because of differences in
sampling  techniques and schedules used by various investigators.  The list
of species present  was as expected, and few anomalies were present in their
relative abundance. Either the Calanoid copepods (especially Diaptomus) or
the Cyclopoid copepods were usually the most abundant group, although they
were outnumbered  in a few samples by Daphnia.  Total zooplankton abun-
dance fluctuated greatly from sample to sample,  and no clear temporal or
geographic trends  could be seen."

-------
                                   26
       3.  Periphyton

           "Periphyton are defined as the complex assemblage of aquatic
organisms, especially green and blue-green filamentous algae, that grow
attached to permanent substrates such as rocks, logs,  steel pilings,  etc. in
shoreline areas.  In addition to the larger algae, there are less obvious
diatoms, many bacteria, protozoa, and invertebrate animals which constitute
the periphyton community.  Under normal conditions periphytic growth is
considered to be beneficial because it is a food source to many fish or fish
food organisms.  Some of the bottom feeding fish, such as carp and suckers,
will browse directly on the filamentous algae.   Forage fish feed on the proto-
zoa and invertebrates.  As the algae die and decompose, the organic material
released becomes nutrients for  other algae and invertebrates,  all of which
constitute the aquatic food chain of the littoral area.

           "It is only when the  periphyton growth exceeds the  rate at which
fish and  invertebrates can assimilate it into the normal food chain that the
growth becomes excessive and a nuisance.  Excessive  growth can create
problems, both aesthetically and practically, when the  filamentous algae
break away and float onto beaches to decay,  enter municipal waterworks, or
clog equipment maintained in the lake."74

           Periphyton samples, collected from natural  substrates in the
Zion area in 1969 (no month given), indicated that the filamentous green
algae,  Cladophora, was the most common organism in the periphyton
community.28

           A more thorough study74 summarizes the results of periphyton
samples collected from April 1970 to March 1971 from both permanent and
artificial substrates near the Zion Station and the  Waukegan Station.  Peri-
phyton growth was measured from May until November, at which time a
combination  of ice, water temperature less than 50°F,  and stormy weather
inhibited growth.

            Permanent substrate growths were characterized by the  cold-
water genera Ulothrix and Stigeoclonium in the spring and Cladophora in
the summer.   Cladophora  glomerata dominated during July and August and
was found on most substrates through October, at which time Ulothrix zonata
reappeared.   The  appearance and disappearance of diatoms and blue-green
algae had no such clear-cut trend.

            The cold-water genera  Ulothrix and Stigeoclonium grew abun-
dantly on artificial substrates before the appearance of Cladophora.
Cladophora first appeared on the artificial substrates  at Zion in June, be-
came abundant in July, and disappeared in August.  Ulothrix was the  most
abundant green algae in the Zion area from  August through November.
The Waukegan intake supported  Cladophora  during July and August,  although
it was not abundant.

-------
                                  27
            Cladophora persisted on the permanent substrates until October,
but its growth on the artificial substrates occurred only during July and
August.  This differential persistence demonstrated the value of studying
both substrates.74

            Abundant diatom growth of several species occurred near Zion
during the entire sampling period.  In contrast, abundant growth at the
Waukegan intake occurred only during spring and summer months and was
limited primarily to two species. The data indicate that diatoms have a
limiting upper temperature for maximum growth between 55 and 70°F, with
a sharp inhibition at temperatures above 70°F.74

            The Zion area did not support abundant blue-green algae growth
during any season.  Abundant growth in the  Waukegan intake was restricted
to the period from July to  October.  The report postulated that blue-green
algae growth is  not expected to increase near Zion after startup because the
underwater, offshore discharge is designed to prevent warm water from
reaching the nearshore substrates suitable  for periphyton growth,

            Chlorophyl _a and  biomass data indicate the largest amount of
periphyton growth on artificial substrates was supported in  the Waukegan
intake canal during August and September.  The  water temperatures were
between 67 and 70°F.  After September, periphyton growth was  greater  on
artificial substrates in the Zion area.  Except for  an early October chloro-
phyl a analysis, the late September to November growth near Zion was  sig-
nificantly larger than growth  in the warmer waters near Waukegan.

            Diatoms were  the most abundant form of periphyton in the
Kewaunee and Point Beach areas. Fragilaria was the most  abundant diatom
represented by nine species.  _F. vaucheriae was the most abundant species
in studies using plexiglass substrates,1   8'131"133  whereas samples  from
natural substrates near Kewaunee in 1971  showed _F. vaucheriae to be in
low abundance.70 The difference was most likely attributed  to the  different
substrates,  (in general, there is a lack of permanent substrates along the
shoreline in that area.)

            Bio-Test studies70 reported periphyton samples taken from
wooden pilings and riprap contained strands of filamentous green  and blue-
green algae intermixed with several species of diatoms.  The most obvious
species of filamentous green algae was Ulothrix zonata,  which •was more
abundant in May and November than in August.  (The University of Wisconsin
studies were limited to periphytic diatoms.)

            There are few results of periphyton studies to report  for 1970-
1971 that are specific to the southeastern shore  of Lake Michigan. Two
periphyton samples were obtained from a 6-ft-deep, plastic, subsurface
float in October  1969.5 The samples were only qualitatively examined to

-------
                                  28
determine the dominant periphyton types in the Cook Plant area in the fall.
The periphyton were very sparse and were dominated by diatoms  of the
genera Gomphonema, Nitzschia, Synedra, Achnanthes, and  Cymbella.  The
dominant diatom was Gomphonema sp., though Melosira varians was also
quite abundant.  One green algae, Stigeoclonium. was present in some num-
bers.  No Cladophora was present.

           A very brief tabulation of the dry weight per square meter of
approximately one month's growth of periphyton in the Palisades area, dur-
ing May-August 1969,  is given in Ref.  30.  No  species identification is
reported.

           Periphyton samples were obtained at the Bailly Station site in
September and October 1970.  These data were taken in the presence of the
thermal discharge from the existing Bailly Plant and therefore will be dis-
cussed in Section III below.

       4.   Benthos

           In April 1968 and August, October, and December 1969, bottom
organisms were collected off Zion at offshore distances out to  5600 ft.
The 1969 samples were generally similar in composition to the samples
collected and reported by Beer and Pipes in April 1968.13  The benthic or-
ganisms found in the Zion area were generally dominated by crustaceans,
but oligochaete worms were most numerous in the shallower areas.  The
fingernail clams (Pelecypoda), Sphaeriidae, and the snails (Gastropoda)
usually composed less than 15% of the benthos found.

           In depths shallower than 10  ft, benthic populations at Zion were
almost nonexistent, probably as the result of scouring by wave action and
the frequent  shifting of bottom sediments.  At depths of 10-20 ft, oligo-
chaetes (aquatic worms)  became the most abundant organism.  Tubificids
were the most abundant shallow-water  species, and Stylodrilus heringianus
was reported as the most abundant deeper-water species.  In waters deeper
than 20 ft,  the burrowing amphipod, Pontoporeia affinis, became the domi-
nant benthic  representative.2

           Samples obtained at Zion from April through  December 1970
showed the benthic populations peaking (approximately tripling) during July
and August, because of reproduction, and then slowly declining during the
fall months.  Pontoporeia affinis was the dominant organism, accounting  for
50-83.4%  of the total population.   Oligochaete worms, midges (Chironimidae),
and fingernail clams (Sphaeriidae) ranked second, third, and fourth,
respectively.

           Samples obtained during 1971  confirmed crustaceans (Ponto-
poreia affinis) as the most abundant benthic organism, with population

-------
                                   29
densities similar to those  of 1970. Oligochaetes, consisting primarily of
tubificids,  composed the second most abundant category, with fingernail
clams third. Snails and insect larvae together composed only about 10% of
the total benthos.  The tubificid population density was somewhat higher in
1971 than in 1970.  The total benthic  population densities varied among vari-
ous sampling areas, but no clear  trends were apparent throughout the year. 9

            Low numbers  of benthos  were collected during  1971, at depths
less than 20 ft, from the clay and rock substratum that underlies the shallow
waters near Kewaunee.  Chironomidae (midge larvae) was the predominant
group of organisms, probably because of its ability to  construct cases and
avoid being swept away by wave action. Different chironomid genera, with
the exception of Heterotrissocladius,  were  observed each season. °

            Reference 121 cites (without reference) a brief study of the ben-
thos at Point Beach in 1968: "The Point Beach benthos was so depauperate
that use of benthic  organisms as indicators (for long range environmental
effects) was abandoned."

            Benthic samples were obtained at the Point Beach Power Plant
at monthly intervals, from May through August 1971 by Argonne National
Laboratory.   The samples, obtained from depths of less than 40 ft, con-
firmed that the benthic population was very sparse.  Unlike the conditions
at Kewaunee, the most common organism collected was the amphipod,
Pontoporeia affinis, with population densities  of 0- 100 organisms/m2.  This
density is extremely low compared to data  from Zion, where population
densities ranged from 4000 to  16,000/m2 (Ref. 77).

            Bottom  samples for benthic invertebrates  were collected in the
Palisades area from May  1968 to October 1970.30  The benthic samples were
typical of those  found in Lake Michigan, the major taxonomic groups being
amphipods (primarily Pontoporeia sp.), aquatic earthworms (Oligochaeta),
freshwater  clams (Sphaeriidae), aquatic insects (primarily Chironomidae),
flatworms  (Turbellaria), leeches  (Hirudinea), and hydra (Coelenterata).
Densities of the amphipods, oligochaetes and pelecypods increased with in-
creasing depth.   Chironomidae were  the predominant organisms at depths
less than 20 ft.119

            The abundance of benthic organisms was low in the Bailly region,
as compared with other aquatic life in Lake Michigan.  Of the organisms
present during September  and October 1970,  oligochaete worms (Tubificidae),
comprised 52% of the total benthic organisms. Most of the species of oligo-
chaetes present were characteristic of eutrophic, but not grossly polluted,
waters.  The two genera of midge larvae present, Chironomus and
Cryptochironomus,  are characteristically found in eutrophic and polluted
sediments.  The  amphipod, Pontoporeia affinis,  is a cold-water form and
found only at the station in deepest water.91

-------
                                   30
           Ayers found that limited sampling for benthos in the Cook Plant
area, during  1969 and part of 1970, was difficult to interpret.5  In a report7
on the initial phase of a large-scale sampling program at the Cook site on
July 1970, he concluded the benthic macrofauna increased strongly with depth
between  15 and 80 ft. Chironomids were present in low abundance over much
of the area and dominated the benthos in depths less than about 20 ft.5

           Reference 34  summarizes lakewide benthos data acquired during
1969 and 1970 in thejollowing way.  "The benthos samples were also about
as expected from previous studies.  In most cases,  total benthos abundance
was between 1000-5000 organisms per square meter,  but it occasionally was
much higher.  Only 3 stations (Sheboygan,  Zion, and ZO miles southeast of
Waukegan) had very high benthos abundance, and even these had more nor-
mal abundance on at least one cruise. Beeton,14 in reviewing the  work of
other investigators, mentioned that the proportions  of amphipods  and oligo-
chaetes reported in the fauna had shifted from 48/39%  respectively to
65/24% between 1931-32 and 1963-64. In the present samples,  however, the
proportion was nearer to the earlier figures stated  above than to  the latter.
This may be  due in part to selection against small forms, especially oligo-
chaetes,  by the sampling and sorting process used on the present study."

           The lack of benthos in the inshore areas of Lake Michigan was
confirmed by Copeland  and Ayers34 in their description of changes in their
sampling locations.   The station at the Kewaunee Nuclear Plant was moved
to 3.5 miles offshore because at 1 mile the sediments were hard and un-
sampleable with  little or no benthos; the Point Beach Station was  moved to
4 miles offshore for these same reasons; the Bailly Nuclear Plant  station
was moved to 2 miles offshore because, while the sediment was sampleable,
there was little or no benthos.

-------
                                   31


             III.  STUDIES RELATED TO THERMAL PLUMES

A.  Physical Characteristics

        Before one can assess the biological or ecological impact of waste-
heat discharges on a particular receiving body of water, it is necessary to
first determine the  "natural state," biological and physical, of the water
body.  This matter has been pursued in the preceding section. The next
step in evaluating the impact requires the identification of the areal extent
and temporal behavior of the temperature changes within the  body of water
induced by the heated additions.  This  section lists and briefly reviews
those references that have provided this kind of information,  either from
direct physical measurements or from model predictions. As indicated in
the Preface, the reference material will for the most part be limited to
subject matter directly related to the Lake Michigan environment.

        The major source of heat input into the Lake  is, of course, solar
energy.  Each spring and summer  it raises the temperature  of large vol-
umes of lake water from 32  to about 70°F. Man obviously has no  control
over this  source.  Rivers and streams are also sources of heat input dur-
ing certain times  of the year. Man has some control over these  sources
by the way he uses them for cooling.  He may also increase their absorp-
tion of solar energy by impounding them behind dams or by reducing their
shade by deforestation. Other significant sources of heat input are, of
course, industrial and municipal uses of the water, over which man has
complete  control.

        The lakewide physical effects  of man-made thermal discharges
(primarily electric-utility generating stations, steel plants, and municipal
waste-water treatment plants) have been analyzed by Asbury.  The studies
showed that if all the waste heat projected for the year 2000 were mixed
throughout the lake, the lake  surface temperature would have to increase
only 0.1°F to dissipate it.  The increased evaporation loss would be
810 cu ft/sec,  compared to a natural evaporation loss of about
40,000 cu ft/sec.

        Figure 3 shows an inventory of the major heat sources for
Lake  Michigan. It includes major rivers, principal  industrial sources, and
steam-electric power plants  contiguous to Lake Michigan. The black semi-
circles represent the estimated thermal-plume  areas associated with the
peak thermal discharges.  The plume areas extend from the point of dis-
charge to the place where the heated water cools to  1.8°F above the natural
ambient lake-water temperature. The size of each plume was calculated
using estimated or known flow and temperature  information for a particular
source, together with a phenomenological model for predicting plume areas
proposed by Asbury and Frigo.4  River-plume areas were  computed from
the maximum monthly thermal-discharge rates associated with the rivers

-------
32
                                •H
                                c
                                CO
                                co
                                00

                               •rl

-------
                                  33
over the period of record (1965-1969). These maximums occurred some-
time in the summer when river-water temperatures are naturally higher
than the lake temperatures.  The river inputs "would be relatively smaller
on an average basis.

        Thus  Fig. 3 visually contrasts peak plume areas  associated with
natural and manmade thermal discharges to the lake. In some situations,
municipal, industrial,  and power-plant heated effluents are discharged to
a river that is  a tributary to Lake Michigan.  Under these circumstances,
it was  not possible  to  separate the contributions of  each  source to the
plume  area shown in the figure.  Each of these  situations is marked with
an asterisk.  The power-plant sources have been singled out by name;
other sources have been designated by the fact that they  are municipal (M),
industrial (I), natural  (R), or combinations  of these sources.  The numbers
refer to the radius  of the semicircles, in feet, that  have  the same areas as
the thermal plumes  they represent.

        1.  Field Data

           An  observation of the  sinking-plume phenomena at the
Point Beach Plant was reported by Hoglund and Spigarelli.59  Temperature
recorders were placed on the bottom  of Lake Michigan near the plant dis-
charge.  Analysis of the  data revealed that  the discharge water  interacted
•with the lake bottom as long as the ambient lake temperature was 39.2°F
or less. When  the ambient lake temperature  exceeded 39.2°F, there was
little indication of temperature perturbations on the bottom as a result of
the thermal discharge.  The data are  presented in terms of the  percentage
of the time the  various recorders were influenced by the plume. The pos-
sible biological implications of this work are discussed  later  in this  section.

           Ten thermal plumes have  been  mapped  at the Waukegan  Plant
by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories over a period from  February 21, 1970,
to June 2, igYi.66-68 The plume data were obtained by boat transverses,
vertical profiles being taken at stationary boat locations. Data  locations
•were determined using boat radar equipped -with a variable-range finder.
Wet- and dry-bulb air temperatures were acquired, along with ambient
wind direction  and speed.  Power-plant factors such as  plant electrical
loading, condenser  water flow, and intake and discharge  temperatures were
also obtained.  The data were presented in  graphical form generally -with
horizontal  sections  showing isotemperature contours.  In most instances,
vertical cross  sections of the plume also showing isotherms were provided.
The plumes were obtained on the following  dates:  February 21,  1971 (shows
sinking-plume  phenomena); April 23,  1970; May 19,  1970; May 27, 1970;
August 24, 1970; September 30, 1970; October 21, 1970;  November 11, 1970;
February 16, 1971 (sinking plume); and June  2, 1971 (cooperative field day).

            The Bio-Test authors have summarized their field  investiga-
tions by indicating that the Waukegan plumes are quite  variable in  size,

-------
                                  34
configuration, and general characteristics, and are most influenced by wind
and wind-induced currents.  They observed that the plumes appeared to re-
spond quickly to wind-induced current movement and were principally  di-
rected in a downwind direction.  They stated that the outer perimeters of
the plumes were found difficult to locate, mainly because  of the tempera-
ture variability of the ambient water. They stated further that the heated
effluent affects the lake-bottom temperature only a short  distance  from the
outfall,  except when the wind blows parallel to the shore or slightly onshore,
causing the plume to remain in shallow water close to the shore.  Heated
water was found to extend more than a mile downwind on such occasions
with a strong  along-shore breeze.

           The heated-plume water  was stated  to rise quite rapidly after
the initial momentum of the  discharge velocity was reduced.  When winter
lake ambient temperatures were either at or near freezing, the plume  was
stated to sink to the lake  bottom and  to spread over the floor.  It was found,
however, that the plume mixed with the ambient water quite rapidly under
these conditions.

           Consumers Power Company has available two documents sum-
marizing 1970 and  1971 in-house thermal-plume temperature surveys  per-
formed  at various company plants throughout Michigan.31'32 Of particular
interest are those studies relating to plants on  Lake Michigan.  The 1970
field surveys  consisted of making temperature measurements at various
water depths throughout an established grid of marker buoys  in the survey
area. The temperatures  acquired were plotted as a function of position for
particular depth levels, and  isotemperature contours were then drawn.
Power-plant  operating data in the form of plant  electrical output, condenser
cooling-water flows, and cooling-water intake and discharge temperatures
were recorded.  Ambient -wind speed and direction, air temperature, and
relative humidity were  the atmospheric variables  recorded.

           Three temperature surveys were performed at the J. H. Campbell
plant on July  10, August 26,  and September 9, 1970.  Only water surface
temperatures were measured on these three field days.  On September 9,
vertical temperature measurements  -were additionally made at five stations.
Two temperature surveys were performed at the B. C. Cobb plant, located
on Muskegon Lake, which empties into Lake Michigan.  The surveys were
made on July  16 and July 17.

           The 1971 field surveys were  somewhat more extensive in that
the surveys also included water chemical sampling and drift-bottle studies.
The water sampling results  were not included in the report.   Three field
studies  were performed at the Big Rock Point Plant:  June 30, July 1, and
July 2,  1971.  Six field  studies were  made at the J. H. Campbell Plant:
June  17, June 18, July 7, July 8, August 3,  and August 4, 1971.  Five studies
were made at the B.  C. Cobb Plant:  June 23, June 24, June 25,  August 5,
and August 6, 1971 .

-------
                                  35
            In a brief summary of these plume measurements, the  report
stated that the heated-plume water was buoyant and spread into relatively
thin layers on the surface of the receiving waters.  The extent of mixing
with adjacent waters was stated not to be •well defined; however, it  appeared
that maximum mixing occurred after the plume had cooled down to within
5.4°F of the ambient receiving water.

            A compilation of 1971 field data gathered by Argonne National
Laboratory relating to physical measurements of thermal discharges for
several power plants  sited on the lake have been reported by Frigo and
Frye.51 The field investigations basically consisted of temperature, water
current, and meteorological measurements.  Water temperatures were
measured by boat using  a submerged boom with probes attached at various
depths.

            Ambient water current and meteorological information consist-
ing of wet- and dry-bulb air temperatures, and wind speed and direction
were  typically recorded for each plume investigation.  Power-plant operat-
ing data were acquired from utility personnel.  The report also describes
plume measurements made using airborne  infrared imagery techniques.  A
study of the sinking-plume phenomenon was also described.

            Plume measurements -were made at the Point Beach Plant dur-
ing March and April (sinking-plume study), on May 20,  June 25, and July 20;
two plumes  on July 21 and August 31; two plumes and an airborne infrared
imagery study on September 1; two plumes on October 28; and a near-field
jet study on November 3, 1971.  Two plume measurements were made at
the Waukegan Plant on June 2.  This was part of a cooperative field effort
and is described separately in this section.  Plume data were also  obtained
at the State  Line Plant on August 4 as part  of another cooperative effort.
Most  of the  data obtained at the various plant sites were reported in graphi-
cal form. The  figures present horizontal and vertical plume sections with
isotherms drawn on 1 °C intervals.   The authors indicated that the data would
be used as input to analytical modeling efforts within their organization.

            A joint field day was conducted at the Waukegan Plant on  June 2,
1971, to compare, among other things,  various plume measurement tech-
niques.   The results showed  rather remarkable  agreement between  plume
isotherms measured by  two different organizations using in situ measure-
ments obtained from moving boats.  An airborne infrared mapping  of the
plume was only  in fair agreement with the other two after the infrared data
were  corrected  to account for  plume-measurement time differences.

            Thermal-plume temperature studies (September 19 and Octo-
ber 28, 1970) were reported on for the  Bailly Power Station.91  The tem-
perature measurements  we re made by taking surface and vertical temperature
profiles at numerous  offshore  sampling positions in the lake.  Meteorological

-------
                                  36
parameters such as wind speed and direction, cloud cover, air temperature,
and relative humidity were recorded in addition to the plant operating pa-
rameters of electrical output, cooling water flows, and cooling water intake
and discharge temperatures.  The data were presented in conventional iso-
therm plots, but for the surface isotherms only.

           Scarpace  and Green have reported on a series of studies using
airborne infrared imagery techniques to map thermal plumes at the
Point Beach and Edgewater Power  Plants.105  In this preliminary reporting
they pointed out a rather interesting and apparently not uncommon plume
phenomenon which is  readily apparent in an infrared image  of the Point Beach
plume shown in Fig. 4.  The discharge temperature during infrared mapping
was  stated to be 78.3°F; the intake  on the ambient water temperature was
61.5°F.   Thus  the darker areas within the figure  represent higher tempera-
ture conditions.  The  authors  attribute the wavelike patterns to "thermal
fronts" moving outward from  the discharge since they have  thermal pictures
of the plume every 5 min and  can therefore follow frontal motion.

           The authors also noticed cyclic temperature  oscillations at a
fixed location  within the Point Beach plume at a depth of 9 ft. Although it
was  not stated whether  these in situ measurements -were  made concurrently
•with the  infrared measurements, the authors believed that such bulk-
temperature oscillations suggest that the thermal fronts  are not just a sur-
face phenomenon. Infrared techniques would measure only the temperature
of the first tens of microns of the surface  water.

           In a more recent paper,10 Scarpace and Green discuss  additional
infrared plume measurements made at the  Point Beach Plant between Sep-
tember  14 and 17, 1971, and additionally speculate on plausible explanations
for the presence  of the  thermal fronts. Apparently the fronts seem to be
the strongest  in very calm -weather and are not evident during high-sea ob-
servations. The  strength of the fronts seems to  vary from day to day.
Horizontal plume temperature gradients larger than 0.9°F/ft were  said to
be observed with frontal motion. It was also observed that  secondary waves
were superimposed on the thermal fronts.  The secondary waves were dis-
covered  with near-infrared photographs; they were just barely visible with the
infrared imagery. Explanations for the secondary waves were also discussed.

           In summary, the authors felt that the  presence of moving ther-
mal fronts adds a significant  dimension to the already complicated biological
and  physical aspects  of heated discharges.

           A comprehensive  infrared study of three power-plant sites on
Lake Michigan was reported on by Stewart, Brown, and  Polcyn.110   The
broad purpose of the  study was to conduct multispectral diurnal surveys
of power-plant effluents into Lake  Michigan and to investigate, where pos-
sible, the various effects and interactions between these plumes  and the

-------
37
                                            .c
                                            o  .«
                                            (0  4-1
                                               o

                                            ti °
                                            C vD
                                            •H r-l
                                            O
                                            Qu  jj

                                            4-1  00
                                            O -H
                                                0)
                                            QJ j2u
                                            00   O
                                            cd  
-------
                                   38
natural ecology of the lake.  Specifically, the report furnished (a) plume
imagery data, (b) an analysis of imagery gathered on growth and movement
of the thermal  bar, (c) a study of wind effects on plume distribution, and
(d) a study of the relationship between the thermal bar, natural river out-
falls, and power-plant discharge.s.

            Infrared scans were made on the J.  H. Campbell Plant on
April 22, 23, and 30 and May 28, 1971.  The data showed extreme plume
variability, dependent on wind speed and direction and wind history.  Com-
plete plume reversals within a 2-hr period were noted; subtle changes were
noticed in a span of 25 min.

            The Michigan City Plant was studied on  April 23, April 30,
May 7,  and May 28, 1971 .  The smallest plume occurred on the day of the
strongest winds.  A wave pattern  in the April 23 data was noticed.  (These
"waves" looked much  like the thermal fronts described by Ref. 106.)

            The Bailly Plant was investigated on April 23, April 30, May 7,
and May 28,  1971.  The April 23 data shows some thermal-wave-pattern
structure in  the plume.

            Some of the  imagery data for the plants  were presented in three
unique forms as a result of computer analysis of the data.  In one form the
plumes were shown contoured into discrete temperature contour bands, the
sum of these bands representing a mosaic  for the entire plume. The  sec-
ond display form involved color-coded temperature  contours.  The third
display form involved the use of computer  symbol signatures combined -with
color overlays to denote the temperature contours.  The data results were
also tabulated to provide plume areas for a particular 1°F temperature
interval.

            A bibliography of thermal-plume field investigations conducted
on large lakes  was reported on by Tokar.114  This report •was a state-of-
the-art survey, -which attempted to identify existing  thermal-plume field
data that could be  used to support or verify analytical plume-modeling ef-
forts associated with heated-water discharges into the Great Lakes.  The
report is somewhat dated in that most of the reviewed plume data, -with a
few exceptions, were of a 1970 origin or earlier. Nevertheless, much of
what the report concluded on the plume field investigations up to 1970 is
perhaps appropriate even to this date.

            The author concluded that the major difficulties associated with
using existing field data for  validating or improving analytical predictive
methods are: (a)  The transient nature of the plumes makes it difficult to
obtain truly characteristic data by normal  techniques,  (b) Many partial
investigations of thermal plumes are being performed by a number of
groups, often at the same location.  Dilution of effort appears to be common.

-------
                                   39
(c) Different mathematical models require different kinds of data, so that
data that are sufficient for one study may not be  sufficient for another.

            The report also  provided an inventory of all the major power
plants sited on the Great Lakes and information indicating plant siting in
terms of electrical output versus state  and lake distribution.

       2.   Mathematical Modeling

            In two  reports, one by Asbury  and Frigo4 and the other by
Frigo,53 thermal-plume field data were used to develop and  validate a sim-
ple phenomenological relationship for predicting the surface areas of ther-
mal  plumes in lakes.  According to the  authors, the relationship they obtained
represents a useful rule  of thumb for predicting  surface areas of buoyant
plumes from surface discharges.  The actual relationship was presented
as an eyeball data  fit on log-log graph paper.

            An analytical expression for the  data of Asbury  and Frigo was
obtained by Elliott and Harkness43 using a  least-squares fit.  Their rela-
tionship is
where 0 and 6O are the plume excess temperatures at any point within the
plume and at the immediate point of discharge, respectively, A  is the total
area, in square feet, of the plume up to the  9 excess isotherm, and  Q  is
the volumetric discharge rate,  in cubic feet per second, of the cooling water.

            In Ref. 53, Frigo correlated much of Argonne  National
Laboratory's  1971  plume field data, taken at various Lake  Michigan-sited
power plants, with the phenomenological model.  All the new data fell within
the data scatter envelope of the phenomenological relationship, and it was
concluded that the  validity of the relationship •was further  strengthened.

            A state-of-the-art report concerning the mathematical model-
ing of thermal discharges into large lakes was reported on by Policastro
and Tokar.92  Sixteen analytical models were critically reviewed discussing
individual model treatment of geometric,  kinematic, hydrodynamic,  and
thermodynamic variables.  The models reviewed did not represent all of
those that could be used for lake applications.  Therefore  a bibliography of
other models  holding potential merit in this regard was also included.  One
of the models reviewed has  been used to make plume temperature predic-
tions  for the Zion Station discharges into Lake Michigan.  All  the material
in the report is highly technical, including its six pages of conclusions and
observations.

-------
                                  40
           A workbook containing computational procedures in the form
of nomograms for estimating the temperature distribution and physical
spread of heated discharges originating from submerged discharges has
been authored by Shirazi and Davis.108

       3.  Hydraulic Modeling

           Hydraulic-model studies of the proposed Zion Station Unit 1 dis-
charge have been made by the Alden Laboratories.26'78  The purpose of
these studies was  to determine the temperature-dilution patterns and ef-
fects  of the condenser cooling-water discharge on Lake Michigan. The
model was adjusted and operated to reproduce prototype conditions at the
point  of discharge. The test facility and test procedures were designed to
simulate field conditions expected at both Zion discharge structures.  The
tests  were conducted for a variety of conditions of lake depth and flow.
The test results were presented in pictorial form showing water-temperature
distributions in the vicinity of the discharge in plan and vertical views.

           The analytical-plume-modeling efforts for the Zion Station are
also given in Ref. 26.  Together they form a complementary set of data and
are discussed in relation to each other  in testimony given at the Illinois
Pollution Control  Board Hearings on January 24, 1972, by D. W. Pritchard."
Dr. Pritchard pointed out that the analytical-modeling results  overestimated
plume lengths in relation to the hydraulic-modeling results for the higher
excess isotherms. For lower excess temperatures (<9°F), the two forms
of modeling were  said to be in complete agreement.  The plume areas pre-
dicted by the two modeling techniques show the analytical method to predict
larger areas by a factor of 1.65.

           Alden Laboratories have also performed hydraulic-modeling
studies for the D. C.  Cook Plant.64  An undistorted model was  used with a
1/75-scale ratio to model the discharge region as accurately as possible.
The experimental features  of the  tank limited the hydraulic-modeling re-
sults to the equivalent of 4000 ft in either direction along the  shore and out
to 4000 ft offshore. Preliminary  trials indicated that the 3°F excess iso-
therm (used  in water -quality regulations) could not be closed within the
tank, so analytical procedures were used to complete the task. Most of the
information gathered thus far was performed on the basis of the discharge
structures using three discharge  slots.  Tests are currently being per-
formed on the  basis of using two  slots per discharge.

        4.   Effects on Shoreline Ice

            The main source of information on shore ice development and
destruction,  and on the potential effects of thermal discharges on this ice,
is work by Ayers.8 During  the winters of 1969-70 and 1970-71, aerial
photographic ice-reconnaissance  surveys of  the entire shoreline of

-------
                                   41
Lake Michigan were performed to observe and photograph the alongshore
ice and open-water areas in the vicinity of nuclear and fossil-fuel power
plants.  On-foot photographic records of the shore  ice conditions were ob-
tained at the Cook Plant site and at  the sites of existing thermal discharges.

            As a result of these activities, Ayers has derived abundant evi-
dence that the shore ice along the Lake Michigan shore has a complex
structure called "the storm icefoot,  lagoon, and outer barrier."  The method
of formation and details of this compound structure are discussed in Ref. 8.

            Ayers et al.  state that evidence from two winters of ice studies
"does not show that  discharges of waste heat cause extensive melting of
shore ice with the resulting exposure of the beaches to wave erosion. In-
stead,  the data show that the usual outfall structure, a sheet-pile flume
leading out  into  the water, will have  shore  ice continuing up to the very
sides of the flume ... (However) At Campbell there has been, both winters,
a considerable area of shore  ice melted, but beach erosion has  not been
evident."8

            Using an analysis of lake currents and wind -direction patterns,
Ayers  et al. concluded that during two -thirds of the winter the  Cook Plant
plume  will not have  significant contact with the shore ice  and the natural
processes of ice-building and ice-destruction will be in control.  "The
Cook Plant  thermal  plume appears,  at this time, to be an ice-destructive
force potentially operative about a third of the time in •winter.  During this
time it will be a destructive force wandering randomly along the shore,
staying in contact with the shore ice for very limited periods at any local
point.  Since its ice  destructive force will always be preceded and followed
by the  natural forces of  ice-building and ice-destruction,  we conclude that
the effect of the Cook  plume on local shore ice will be only a limited dimi-
nution  in the amount of ice present."8

B.  Biological Characteristics

       Coutant36 summarized the  concern about thermal discharges as
follows:

        "We visualize  the power plant as a large artificial predator  acting
on these populations.  Our opinion has been molded by laboratory  experi-
ments which have shown that thermal shocks may lead to  death  or induce
secondary effects that ultimately  affect survival of the organism or its
population.  We  may fail to realize,  however, that these devastating results
are not obligatory in the entrainment process.  Rather, they occur only as
a result of specific combinations  of temperature and duration of exposure."

       This section describes studies performed and testimonies presented
that are relevant to  these effects  of  "temperature and duration of exposure"

-------
                                  42
on aquatic organisms. Many of these organisms are of immediate impor-
tance to man through commercial fisheries, sport fisheries, or biological
nuisances.119  Others are important as food-chain contributors to those
species of more direct interest. Still others are  important components of
the entire ecosystem, without which other processes in the lake  could not
proceed.119

       A division was made in this report between thermal-plume effects
and intake and discharge effects.  Problems with  fish kills on intake screens
and mechanical damage due to pumping were easily relegated to the section
on intakes and discharges.  However, some of the temperature-related ef-
fects, such as periphyton growth and fish behavior, were not clearly sepa-
rable into the specific sections.  Thus, a somewhat arbitrary decision was
made to describe those studies that were performed  primarily in the intake
or discharge in the section on  Intake and Discharge Effects.  Those  studies
that included lake measurements as •well as intake and discharge measure-
ments are reported here.

       1 .   Waukegan Power Plant

           A number of studies of the biological  effects of thermal  dis-
charges have  been undertaken' by the Bio-Test Laboratories  for  Common-
wealth Edison. The  studies use the heated discharge of the Waukegan
power plant.

           Following preliminary studies in 1968, reported  by Beer and
Pipes,13 fish  collections  were made near the Waukegan and Zion areas
from March through October 1970.  Thirteen species were taken in the
Waukegan area and 1 7 in the Zion area.73  The most  dominant fish were
alewife, smelt, spottail shiner, chub, and yellow perch.  The data indicated
that alewives  seemed to  prefer the warm discharge water throughout the
test period; the coho salmon seemed to prefer it only during the spring.

           During 1971, alewives were  again the  most abundant in the
sampling area, with  very large concentrations in  the discharge during
August and September. A heavy concentration of  adult spottail shiners
was observed in the  Waukegan discharge in June, but no  young-of-the-year
were taken in subsequent samples.

           Fish  that were present throughout the year in both the Waukegan
intake and discharge canals were  carp, goldfish, and white suckers.  Sport
fish taken during early spring  and late fall included brown trout, rainbow
trout, and coho salmon.  They were found mainly  in the intake canal, though
a few were captured in the discharge.72

           Phytoplankton samples taken in May to September 1970 indicated
no  significant differences in total population densities between the intake  and

-------
                                   43
discharge canals.  Offshore densities -were  somewhat lower than the canal
densities.  Diversity and evenness indexes showed little difference among
populations in the intake, discharge, and offshore during the sampling pe-
riod.28  These results were essentially confirmed during the 1971 studies.72

            Monthly sampling of zooplankton in and out of the Waukegan
plume was carried out from June through October  1970.  Generally, there
were more  organisms  inside than outside the plume.

            Ayers6 conducted studies at the Waukegan Station on June  30,
1969  (intake temperature, 55°F; outfall temperature, 6l.9°F), and found an
apparent phytoplankton kill of 10%.   There was no evidence of heat-stimulated
recovery in the near region of the plume.  The population-density ratio,
with respect to  a station 2000 ft from the outfall, was 0.6:1.6

            The zooplankton numbers indicated similar trends with the pop-
ulation density reduced 15% at the outfall and a ratio (plume/outfall) of
0.2:1 at 2000 ft.6

            "In  summary, the biological data show kill-off of both phytoplank-
ton and zooplankton in passage  through the plant.  In  both types of plankton
there appears to have been continuation of die-off between the outfall and
the nearby portion  of the plume.  Benthos results showed nothing attribut-
able to the plant except bottom  scour due to currents in the  intake and
outfall."6

       2.   Point Beach Power Plant

            The plankton, periphyton, and benthos communities of inshore
waters •were sampled near  the Point Beach Nuclear Plant by Argonne
National Laboratory, during 1971, to determine the biological effects of the
thermal discharge.109 With respect  to phytoplankton, it was concluded from
vertical tows for plankton that no significant differences existed between
plume and nonplume "water  in terms  of plankton biomass.  However, fluoro-
metric analysis of  phytoplankton samples showed considerable  variation
in chlorophyl a  concentration (proportional  to phytoplankton productivity)
at the sampling stations. Initially (nearest  the discharge), there  seemed
to be an inhibition in chlorophyl a^.  Approximately 1400 ft from the dis-
charge an increase had occurred, and at greater distances the levels de-
creased  to  near ambient  concentrations.   A significant increase  in
chlorophyl a concentration  was observed in the plume in July, when an up-
welling resulted in elevated nutrient concentration.

            With respect to periphyton, its growth was significantly greater
at the three stations nearest the discharge.  Growth  at all other stations
was similar to that at the control areas.  Periphyton productivity, as meas-
ured by 14C uptake, was significantly higher at a station 5000 ft from the

-------
                                  44
discharge than at the control station and at a station nearer the discharge.
The elevated temperature near the discharge apparently did not stimulate
periphyton production during the period of the study.

            Fish were routinely collected by Argonne National Laboratory102
from  several locations, including the discharge canal, the beach zone near
the discharge,  and a control beach zone approximately 2 miles north of the
Point Beach plant.  Hand seining was used in the shallow beach zones, and
scuba divers speared large fish in the discharge canal.  This  sampling dis-
closed that  during the summer months of May through July, alewives were
the most abundant fish in the discharge  canal and the beach zone.  Dense
schools were observed in the discharge canal  and often out  into the lake as
far as 150 yards from the discharge.  Carp were the most commonly ob-
served fish, both in the discharge and beach zones.  Schools of 10-30 fish
swam in and out of the discharge canal along the sides and bottom through
temperature gradients of up to 18°F.  Suckers were observed  each time
divers entered the discharge (June-September).  Smallmouth bass of vari-
ous sizes were observed only in the discharge. Trout and salmon were  not
observed in the discharge channel during the higher-temperature periods
(>7Z°F).  Trout and salmon  also frequented the near-field plume region as
evidenced by good catches  made  by boat fishermen.

            The spatial distribution of fish in and around a thermal plume
was observed  by Argonne National Laboratory during tests  to  examine the
feasibility of acoustic fish-locating equipment. On October 28,  1971, si-
multaneous  echo-sounding  and temperature measurements were made as
a boat traversed through the Point Beach Nuclear Plant thermal plume.
Observations were made in daylight and after  dark.  The major difference
observed bet-ween  the day and night runs was the presence of a large num-
ber of schools  of fish during the  day and the complete absence of schools
during the night. The number of individual fish observed at night is almost
seven times greater than during  the day. In general, during both the day
and night series, the majority of fish (species unknown) were  in water less
than  55°F, and  at no  time were fish detected in plume -water warmer than
59 F. Many fish, however,  have  been  observed in the discharge canal  in
much higher temperatures.103

            An interesting  study of the effect of thermal discharges  on the
swimming patterns of coho  salmon past the Point Beach Nuclear Plant has
been released by The University of Wisconsin - Madison.57  The fish were
tracked by underwater telemetry equipment  and a special temperature-
sensitive ultrasonic  transmitter  attached externally  to the fish. All fish
tracked in 1971 were adult coho salmon captured at Algoma, Wisconsin.
The fish were displaced 23  miles southward and released for  tracking at
a point approximately 0.9 mile southeast of the Point Beach water-intake
structure.

-------
                                   45
            Preliminary analysis of the 1971 tracking data indicates that
three general patterns of movement •were followed by the fish tracked in
the Point Beach area; 1) Five fish closely followed the  shore line and def-
initely did encounter the plume; 2) two fish  swam approximately 0.3-
0.6 mile offshore and may or may not have  come into contact -with the
plume;  and 3) four fish definitely did not encounter the plume.

            Of the five fish that definitely contacted the  thermal plume, two
made a course change of about 90° at a point considered to be the location
of the plume interface and subsequently swam approximately parallel to the
interface.  At the location of course change  of these fish, the temperature
increase across the plume  interface was from 52 to 59°F in the first case,
and from 55 to 61 °F in the second.  A third  fish twice encountered the plume
edge very  near the hot-water-discharge  structure, and upon each contact
changed swimming direction by 180 .  The temperature  rise across  the
plume  interface in this area-was from  59 to 70°F.  The fish was swimming
northward at 1.6 ft per second.  Immediately before first contacting the
plume,  his speed increased to  2.5 fps.  After first contact with the plume,
the fish changed direction and  swam south,  approximately 0.1  mile,  at
0.8 fps.  After turning northward again, he was  swimming at 0.7 fps while
approaching the plume for a second time. After the second contact, the fish
swam 0.75 mile southward  at 2 fps  before turning north  and approaching
the discharge area a third time.  The transmitter signal was then lost after
the fish had been tracked to •within 0.2 mile  of the discharge structure. The
tracking signal was  also lost from two other fish1 which  had entered  the
plume  area before sufficient data on their behavior  at the plume interface
could be obtained.

            Of the other fish that encountered the plume, all four exhibited
a marked increase in swimming speed during the track  segment immedi-
ately preceding  contact with the plume.   Three of these  fish were lost in
the plume  due to transmitter failure, but the fourth was  tracked through the
plume.  While passing through the plume, this fish decreased its swimming
speed slightly from  2.3 to 2 fps.  Two of the fish that were  among those lost
in the plume due to transmitter failure were later captured in their  home
stream area (Algoma, Wis.) by sport fishermen.

            The effect upon fish resulting from  power -plant shutdowns dur-
ing emergency or  normal situations -were referred to briefly in Ref. 129.
It was  stated that it  -was significant to note that  operating experience for the
first six months at the Point Beach Station showed that with 20 shutdowns,
occurring  primarily in the winter months, no fish are known to have been
killed and  no other adverse effects  were observed.

        3.   Blount Street Plant (Lake Monona)

            A study  to assess  distributional responses of fishes to operation
of a power plant with once-through cooling on Lake  Monona was reported by

-------
                                   46


Neill and Magnuson.80 Integration of field and laboratory results suggested
that  fishes were distributed -within the outfall area according to their dif-
ferent temperature preferences.  Preferred temperatures of six
Lake Monona fishes were measured by allowing each of several  specimens
to behaviorally regulate the temperature of its tank.  The midpoint of the
preferred (laboratory-determined) temperature range agreed well with the
median  body temperature of the fish as measured in the outfall area dur-
ing afternoon tests.  For example, carp, 89.2 (labor atory )/87 .1 °F (field);
blue  gill, 86.5/84.9°F; large mouth bass, 84.4/85.5°F; black  crappie, 82.9/
82.9°F;  rock bass, 81 .1/81 .5°F; and yellow perch, 74.1/80.8°F.  (For yellow
perch, temperatures below 79.7°F were not available in the outfall area.)

            Temperature was a major factor governing fish  distribution in
that  fish tended to be most  abundant in that part of the habitat having tem-
peratures within  the species-preferred range of temperature as determined
in the laboratory. Disparate distribution of some specific fish species of
different size  resulted from the  influence of factors other than size-related
differences in preferred temperature. For example, spatial  segregation
between young  and adults of two  species, carp and yellow bass, probably
did not  reflect  size differences in preferred temperature.  Adult carp were
concentrated in the outfall area during summer, but the young carp were
not, even though thermal regulatory behavior  of young carp indicated that
they preferred temperatures between 86 and  92.3°F, temperatures avail-
able  only in the outfall area.  Young yellow bass avoided the outfall area;
larger yellow bass were relatively abundant there and were  particularly
concentrated near the jets.  Yet,  large yellow bass stayed near the bottom
in water not much warmer  than the reference areas where the young lived,
indicating that  temperature alone -was not the dominant factor.  Water-
velocity effects were offered as  one explanation for the above-mentioned
behavior.  Explanations  of this behavior were not offered in  the report.80

            Laboratory  experiments80 with bluegills and yellow perch con-
firmed  that fish may be  attracted to food-rich environments, but suggested
that  the attraction to food does not override the behavioral thermal regu-
lation.  Provided an environment with the preferred temperature is avail-
able, the fraction of time  spent in a food-rich environment is likely  to
decrease abruptly as the temperature diverges from the preferred.  Fishes
may, however, briefly foray from an  environment offering the preferred
temperature, but not food, into cooler or warmer  (even lethally warm)
water where food is available.

        4.   Michigan City Station

            Biological data -were obtained from the intake, outfall, and sta-
tions 400 and  1000  ft from the outfall, at the Michigan City Station on
June 28, 1969.6 The temperatures were:  intake,  64°F; outfall, 77.4°F.  The
data indicated  some kill-off of phytoplankter s because the outfall population

-------
                                   47
density was 14% less than that of the intake.  Phytoplankton densities in the
plume were larger than those in the outfall.  The ratio was 2.45:1 at 400 ft
and 1.34:1  at 1000 ft.  Some of the  increase was associated with the blue-
green algae, Oscillatoria, and the yellow-brown alga Dinobryon, but the in-
vestigators could not tell if it was  due to plant heat or to foreign water
masses drifting in from the southwest.6

            The zooplankton showed a decrease  from intake to discharge of
2.9:1,  and many dead or broken organisms were 'observed in the outfall
sample. Zooplankton densities  in the plume, relative to the outfall, varied
from 5.3:1 to 0.2:1.  As in the phytoplankton data, Ayers et al.  were unsure
whether drifting water  masses affected the data.6

            The waste heat from the  Michigan City Generating Station did
not appear to affect the benthic  organisms.6

            Table  4 summarizes direct measurements of the time  required
for a plastic bag, nearly filled with water, to travel from the mouth of the
plant outfall to a point where  ambient lake temperature was reached.5  The
short duration  of bag drifts was unexpected.  Ayers et al.  indicate that,
even in larger  plumes, the duration of the greater than ambient tempera-
tures is probably too brief to trigger excess  algae blooms.5

        5.   Bailly Plant

            Field data were obtained on two days during September and
October 1970 at the Bailly Plant, located between Michigan City and Gary,
Indiana. The purpose was to  compare samples of the pertinent biological
parameters obtained from the plume area and the adjacent ambient waters.
A summary of  the results91 indicated higher concentrations of  diatoms,
dinoflagellates, and blue-green  algae in samples taken from the warm water.
However, concentrations of golden-brown algae  (other than diatoms) and
green algae were similar for samples both inside and outside the plume.
Concentrations of green algae increased with decreasing distance from
Burns Ditch.  The growth was higher near shore than 4000 ft offshore.91

            The periphyton showed greater concentrations of Cladophora
glomerata both within  the thermal  plume and in  adjacent areas  than in areas
along the  southwest shore of the lake.91   Zooplankton were three to four
times  more abundant within the thermal plume than outside it.  In general,
most forms found in the plume are characteristic of eutrophic conditions.
The most abundant organism  was the cladoceran, Daphnia retrocurva, fol-
lowed by the copepod,  Eurytemora affinis. Individuals of these species
found •within the plume  were infested with fungus, whereas those collected
outside did not exhibit any fungus.91

            A large concentration of yellow perch were found in the plume
at the  time of sampling.  The intake /discharge temperatures were 66/81°F

-------
                           48
           •H a
           M -H
           O H
                                     •g
                                     CM
 c  c
•H -H
 3  B

O 00
CO CS|
                           c
                          1
g
3
rH
PH
rH
tO
g
CU
JS
H
B
•H
CU
M
V
•U
•?
"^
00
B Pn
•H o
,H
O •
0 H
0 <




vO
•
CNJ
!-t





                                                  CO
                                                    •

                                                  O
**


n) o
O r-t
j fe

o
in o
CS O
CM m
in »~H









0
.- o
vO O
CO O
in in
rH rH


§
M

CO
n)
                                                  oo
                                                  oo
                              o
                              o
                              o
                             •   *
                              o
                              r-
           T)
            c
            n)

            0)
            u  a)
            id  4->
 iH O
 •H CM
 tO "^
 PQ vO
                                      tO O
                                      PQ -H
                           •H
                           u

                            c o
 O ~--
•H O
S rH

-------
                                  49


on September 19 and 52.3/66.2°F on October  28, 1970.  It was speculated
the fish may have been attracted by the greater abundance of zooplankton
in the region of the thermal plume.

       6.   J. H. Campbell Plant

            A biological survey in  the vicinity of the J. H. Campbell Plant
was performed by the Michigan Water Resources Commission11  during
August 11-13, 1970.  The plant was operating with an intake temperature
of 63°F and a discharge temperature of 77°F. Bottom trawling for fish re-
vealed no consistent differences between plume and nonplume areas.  Most
of the fish collected were young-of-the-year  smelt. Yellow perch were
next in abundance.

            Large amounts of filamentous green algae, Cladophora, were
collected in the trawl through the plume area.  The origin of the  algae was
unknown.u6

            Plankton algae samples exhibited no gross numerical differences
or changes in community structure between the discharge and ambient
waters.116

            Results from the benthic sampling indicated a statistically sig-
nificant increase in number of species found near the  discharge canal. Al-
though there was a slight increase  in total population near the discharge
area, the population samples were  not significantly different from the con-
trol points.  It was speculated that the use of nutrient-laden water from the
Pigeon River, for cooling, may  have caused the increase in species.1

            It was concluded116 that the increased benthic productivity in
the plant's outfall was the only adverse effect that could be attributed to
the warm-water discharge.

       7.   Miscellaneous Studies

            Several papers have been published during the last two years
that provide  laboratory temperature-tolerance  data for several
Lake  Michigan fish. Edsall et al_.41 tested juvenile and young  adult bloaters
for tolerance to high temperatures.  The "ultimate" upper lethal tempera-
ture (the lethal temperature that cannot be increased by increasing the ac-
climation temperature) for the juvenile bloaters was  80.1°F, slightly higher
than that for the young adult bloaters.  The thermal tolerance of juvenile
bloaters was slightly less than that of brook  trout,  but higher than that of
other Salmonidae.

            Brungs17 reported the exposure of fathead minnows to elevated
water temperatures of 78.8-93.2°F. He found that reproduction was more

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJS.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJS.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------
                                   51
            Using lake-bottom temperatures measured continuously during
March and April 1971 during a  study of the  sinking-plume phenomenon at
the Point Beach Plant, Hoglund and Spigarelli59 used the data of Colby and
Brooke2  to predict the hatching time of lake herring eggs subjected to the
observed temperatures during their incubation period. For the conditions
studied (2000 ft from discharge, 2 1 ft deep), the calculations predicted the
lake herring emergence would be advanced  about 7 days as a result of ex-
posure to the sinking plume.

            A rather significant development related to the problem of
power-plant design and site  selection has been reported by Coutant.   He
described steps being taken to develop quantitative mathematical predict-
ability of detrimental biological effects of thermal discharges. For instance,
a "survival nomogram"  (a graphical representation  of lethal temperatures
versus time, with acclimation-temperature  parameters) may be prepared
for many aquatic species for which sufficient data may be available.  Then,
with the  aid of  a time-at-temperature graph, developed by analyzing the
velocities and temperatures an organism will experience while passing
through the plant and plume,  one may determine if lethal conditions will be
experienced by the organism being studied.   If this type of analysis is per-
formed during  the design stage of the plant, then engineering changes that
affect the temperatures  or velocities may be incorporated to minimize  the
problem. For  those who prefer the mathematical approach, these data are
easily converted to a set of regression equations.

            With the acquisition of sufficient data related to sublethal effects,
such as equilibrium loss and increased susceptibility to predation, the meth-
od described above may be used to estimate the probability  of these effects
or to design the plant to minimize them.

            If accepted,  this approach clearly defines the type of laboratory
and field data that must be acquired to make full use of its utility.

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJU.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJU.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJV.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJV.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJW.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJW.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------OCR error (C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJX.tif): Saving image to "C:\Conversion\JobRoot\00000DFN\tiff\20017QJX.T$F.T$F" failed.

-------
                                                               56
13

in
                  in

                 $
                       (H

                  t/>   


                  CO  cS
                 £
Che
          o
          o
          t~~
                  4^
                  • H

                  O
                  00
                 • H
                 • H
X  4J
-(   (i

-H   0)
H   4->   VO

     l/>   rH
                         r^
                         cn
                                           tt
                                           r-~
                                           cn
                                           to
                                           t^-
                                           cn
                                           o
                                           to
                                           CTl
                                 \o
                                 o
                                 fSJ
                                      vO
                                      cn
                                           vO
                                 LO
                                 oo
                                 •^t
                                       Ol
                                       en
                                       t--
                                                   o  cn
en   to
oo

to
to




to
to






r-^
C-l





to


o
LO to LO
O f-J
<*a-


r*
5
.W
MH
MH
O



c
•H
i-H
0
rn
O
X
CO

f-4
o
X
10
M-t
(4-1
O
£
42
S
0)
r<
ri
Ul
MH
S


0)
.a
rH
8
o
rC
CO

rH
O

(ft
MH
ItH
O

                             00

                            5
                                 &
                                 s
                                 I
                                 o
                                            rt
                             CO    00   V-.    VH
                             -H    CO    O    CO
                             O,   (H    4->    0
                             aj    a>    o   >•«

                             1   <   O,   rH

                             z              ra
                                       CO   -H

                                      rH    G

                                      CX   rH
                                                                             ff
                                                                             CO
                                                                             u
                                                                             §    §
                                                                             3   8
                                                                             a   a

-------
                                                           57
                                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                                    £
                                                                                                                    <+H
                                                                                                                    w
O-   0)   (X
     rH   ^-*
 00
•H

»   6
                  3
CJ

CQ
                                          (Nl

                                          vO
                        rH        tO

                        03   LO   LO
     §
     OO
     CD
                                     vO
                        00
                        ^1-
                        cr>
                                                           LO
                                                  vO
                                                                   to
                                                                        oo
                                                                             LO

                                                                             o
                                             to
                                             CM
                                                                   to
                                                                        LO

                                                                        O
                                                                             o
                                                                              •
                                                                             to
                                        r§   r§

                                        03   03
                                        14-1   m
                                        o   o





                                        Bl
                                        O   -1
                                        00
                                        CD   uff

                                        a   >•
                                        3   ,

§   0}
                                                                                                                    (53
                                                                                                                         £
LO


 -3
                       O   O  LO   vO   vO      C7)
                            LO  o>   r~-   CTI      oo
                       4-»   vO  •<*•        rH
                                                 OO   O
                                                 tO   O
                                                      IO
                                                                                 to
                                                          CD

                                                     0)   TO
                                                     rH  _J
                                                     O
                                                    JS   C
                                                     in   o
                                                     c   CD
                                                    c3   oo
                                                                                                  CD  PU
                                                                                                  4-1
                                                                                                       rH
                                                                                                                    CJ
                                                                                                                         rt
                                                                  CD



                                                                  «   if
                                                                  0)   -H
                                                                  tfl   rH
                                                                  in   o
                                                                       3Q
                                                                       C_)
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                  rt
                                                                                                                   CO   0)
                   s
                  i—i
                  OH

                                 O
               2

               g
               53   /->
              CJ   dv°
                   V	'
               0)
               00  rH
               03   O
               r<   4J
               OJ   O
          CD

          03   
                                           03
                                          CD
                                          73
 03   -H
•H   d
OH   rH
                                                  X
                                                  «r>
                                                       X
                                                  in   o
                                                  o   u  o


                                                  4->   CD   CD
O.   C/0"  CO'

r-t   00  00

3   .S   .3
 rH   r-t   i—t
 Q>   Q   Q
                                                                   UJ
                                                                                                                    OH   00
                                                                                                               rH        fH
                                                                                                               t^   rH   03

                                                                                                               0>   -H  rC
                                                                                                               r-t   in   O

                                                                                                                    in   in
                                                                                                               T3   O  -H
                                                                                                               CD   UH  Q
                                                                                                                    C  £
                                                                                                                   •rj  P
                                                                                             fr

                                                                                             O
                                                                                                                    V)
                                                                               18

                                                                               T3  T.1
                                                                               CD   0)
                                                                           "   p   3
                                                                           e   o   o
                                                                           O   rH   rH
                                                                           rH   03   03
                                                                          P-.   CJ   CJ
                                                                          *    *    *
                                                                               *    *
                                                                                    *

-------
                                  58
       To better understand the mechanisms of power-plant cooling, the
current design features of the cooling systems  for five major nuclear
power plants sited on Lake Michigan will now be described.

       1.  Kewaunee Plant Cooling System

           The condenser cooling-water system for the Kewaunee Plant
is shown schematically in Fig. 5.  Briefly,  the cooling water is withdrawn
from the lake at three intake ports located  about 14 ft below the lake sur-
face. Steel trash grills with 1-ft-square openings are installed above the
intake openings to prevent large debris from entering the system.  In addi-
tion, an air-bubble screen around the periphery of the intake structure
discourages possible fish penetrations.  Most of the intake structure and
the entire 10-ft-dia intake pipe  leading from the structure to the plant is
buried below the bottom of the lake.  The cooling water  is drawn through
the intake ports, in a downward direction, at about 0.9 fps.  It flows by
action of gravity through the 10-ft-ID intake pipe and  empties into the
forebay of the screenhouse.  The water velocity in the intake pipe at full
flow is about 11 fps.  The screenhouse  forebay  acts as a stilling basin to
reduce the water velocity before the water  passes through a bar or  trash
grill (size unknown) and the traveling or  rotating screens.

           Each traveling screen has a 3/8-in. mesh.  Each screen is a
continuous belt constructed of screening  panels with a shelf  at the lower
edge of each panel.  The screen is rotated  upward in a plane normal to the
waterflow direction.  Any debris larger than about 3/8 in. is thus "caught"
by the  screen, and as the screen moves upward out of the flowing water,
the debris falls off into the shelves.  These shelves are backwashed auto-
matically, the debris being sluiced to a strainer casket,  where it is collected
and eventually removed  for onsite burial.  A hypochlorinating system is pro-
vided to inject sodium hypochlorite,  if necessary,  into the inlet of the travel-
ing screens to prevent the buildup of bacterial  slime on the condenser tubes.

           After the water passes through the  screens,  it is still within a
large basin, which helps to distribute the waterflow evenly to the circulating-
water-pump intakes located at the bottom of the basin.  The  circulating-
water pumps then deliver this water to the  condenser. While the circulating
pumps are operational, the water surface level in the basin is liable to be
many feet below the lake surface  level, which allows lake water  to be drawn
into the intake system by gravitational flow.

           As the cooling water flows through the condenser it picks up
heat. The heated cooling water is returned to the lake by means of a dis-
charge  basin located at the shoreline.  The basin is approximately 40 ft wide
at the shoreline discharge point.  During the winter, to  control the formation
of ice in the  system, the circulation flow will be reduced to 287,000 gpm
with a corresponding rise in temperature of the cooling water of about 29°F.

-------
                                           59
o
                                                                                                         4-1
                                                                                                         co
                                                                                                         CO

                                                                                                         oo
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         M
                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                         CO
                                                                                                         a
                                                                                                         0)

                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         o

                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                         (U

                                                                                                         §
                                                                                                         a)
                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                         •rl
                                                                                                         4-1
                                                                                                          CO


                                                                                                          §


                                                                                                         •g
                                                                                                          00
                                                                                                         •H

-------
                                   60
Under this operation, a portion of the discharge water is returned to the
intake via a 10-in. recir culation line. Figure 6 shows the intake and dis-
charge structures in much greater detail.

       2 .    Point Beach Plant Cooling System

            The condenser cooling-water system for the Point Beach Plant
is schematically shown in Fig.  7. The Point Beach Plant has two generating
units and, therefore, two  independent condenser cooling systems. The in-
take structure is made of steel piling forming a hollow cylindrical structure,
standing upright on the lake bottom,  and filled with staggered limestone
blocks.  In addition, thirty-eight 30-in.-dia pipes pass through the intake
structure  about 5 ft  above the lake bottom.  The lakeside ends of these pipes
are covered with ly^ x 2-in. gratings. Figure 8 is an isometric view of the
intake design.  Most of the intake water flows through the void spaces be-
tween the limestone blocks.  The isometric sketch is not correctly drawn,
because the blocks are shown closely fitted when in  reality they are  some-
what more randomly oriented.

            During normal, as opposed to wintertime, operation, both 14-ft-
dia intake pipes are used to conduct the water to the plant screenhouse
forebay. At full flow, the water  velocity in both intake pipes can approach
5.4 fps.  After  entry into the forebay, the water  passes through bar grates
spaced about 2 in. apart, then through traveling  screens using 3/8- in. mesh
size.  The design water velocity through the screens is about 1.1 fps.  The
debris collected on the traveling screens is sluiced  to a strainer basket
having 3-in. -square openings.  The small-sized debris and the wash water
are returned to the Unit 2 discharge flume.  After passing through the
traveling screens, the water divides between the circulating pump  intakes
for the two  units.  From this point on, the two cooling systems  are inde-
pendent, each having its own pumps, condensers, and discharge structures
(outfalls).  Both discharges are nominally 35-ft-wide canals extending out
into the lake approximately 150 ft.  Each outfall is at a 60° angle with shore.
The average water discharge velocity within the flume is about 2.2 fps.

            During winter operation, or whenever the intake water tempera-
ture falls below 40°F, 108,000 gpm of the discharge  water is recirculated
to the intake structure to prevent the formation of ice in the cooling system.
This  is accomplished by reversing the flow in one of the 14-ft intake pipes.
At this time, the other pipe will  maintain a higher intake flow of 428,000 gpm.
Under these flow conditions and  while at full plant power,  the temperature
rise for  the cooling water will be about 31.5°F,  instead of the normal 19.3°F
rise.

       3.   Zion Station Cooling System

            The schematic flow  diagram for the Zion Station condenser
cooling system is shown in Fig.  9.  Details of the intake structure are shown

-------
61

-------
                                                      62
<

E
o
                                                                                                                          c
                                                                                                                          §
                                                                                                                         4-1

                                                                                                                          CO

                                                                                                                          >•>
                                                                                                                         t/1


                                                                                                                          00
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                                          01
                                                                                                                          CO

                                                                                                                          cu

                                                                                                                         "8
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                          cfl
                                                                                                                          cu
                                                                                                                          PQ
                                                                                                                          c
                                                                                                                          •H
                                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                                          PH
                                                                                                                           o
                                                                                                                          •H
                                                                                                                           J-J
                                                                                                                           ct)

                                                                                                                           I

                                                                                                                           u
                                                                                                                           C/l
                                                                                                                           00

                                                                                                                           •rl
                               CM

-------
63
                                             CM
                                               0)
                                               CO




                                                tfl
                                                4J
                                                a
                                               00


                                                 •

                                                00

-------
64
                                                                     ca
                                                                     •u
                                                                    •H
                                                                    I
                                                                    4J

                                                                    CO
                                                                     t>0

                                                                    .5
                                                                    H
                                                                     O
                                                                     o
                                                                    u

                                                                     Vj
                                                                     0)
                                                                     (fl
                                                                     d
                                                                     a)
                                                                    •a

                                                                     o
                                                                    u

                                                                     a
                                                                     o
                                                                    •r(
                                                                    N

                                                                    M-l
                                                                     O
                                                                    0)

                                                                    O

-------
                                   65
in Fig. 10.  The inlet ports are about 1 7 ft below the water surface.  The
roof structure is located above the two large intake ports to prevent vortex
motions in the inlet water, as well as to provide more of a horizontal ve-
locity gradient around the intake. Water not only enters through the larger
two center ports but additionally through 45 small-diameter holes located
around the periphery of the intake.  These smaller ports serve a double
purpose.  In the wintertime, warm discharge water is recirculated through
them to prevent system icing.   These smaller ports  eventually lead to the
center intake  pipe shown in Fig. 10, via a common plenum,  the thawing box.
All three  16-ft-dia intake pipes lead to the  forebay.  At full circulating flow,
the average water-intake velocity at the two larger ports will be 2.47 fps
while the  16-ft intake pipes will have a 5.6-fps average flow velocity.

            An isometric drawing of one of Zion's 12 traveling screens is
shown in Fig.  11. The  bar grill has vertical 2-in. openings. The flow ve-
locity will be  1.2 fps at the grill face and about 2 fps  at the  traveling screens.
After passing  through the screens, the water is withdrawn by the respective
circulating pumps for each unit and eventually is discharged to the lake about
760 ft offshore.  The total transit time from intake to discharge is  about
2 min.  The discharge  structure for Unit 2  is  shown in Fig. 12. The dis-
charges are 154 ft on either side of the centerline for the intake pipes.
Each structure consists of a rectangular box with outlet louvers located on
the offshore end and on the side away from the intake pipes. The outlet from
the discharge  structure consists of 14  ports roughly  7 ft wide by 3  ft high.
The ports  are directed  so as to form a 45°  angle with both the  intake lines
and the  shore.

            During winter operation, part of the discharge water is  recir-
culated  to  the  intake structure by flow  reversal  in the central  16-ft-dia
intake pipe. The cooling-water circulation rate and temperature rise for
winter were not specified.

       4.    D. C. Cook Plant Cooling System

            The condenser cooling-water system for  the Cook  Plant is sche-
matically shown in Fig. 13.  The intakes are surrounded by octagonal-
shaped, heavy structural frames provided with bar racks and 8 by 8-in.
grating  on all  sides.  The top of each frame is covered with a  steel  roof.
At full flow, the intake  water velocity through the grating interstices will
be 1.27  fps. Figure 14  shows a vertical view of a typical intake structure
along with the grills of parallel vertical bars with 2|-in. openings between
them.  The water velocity through the grills is about 1 fps.  The traveling
screens have  3/8 - in. - square openings, and the water velocity through the
screens will be at most 2 fps.   The  debris collected by the screens  will be
removed as solid waste.  Units 1 and 2 have different condenser cooling-
water flow requirements due to differences  in turbine designs.

-------
                                                  66
                Note  Pipes shall hove a minimum 3.0'  cover
  tEL.551.7'
r- I.G.L D 1955
            L.W Datum
            EL. 576.8'
            IGLO 1955
               Sheet piling
L- 16.0' £ C W intake pipe
                                            0             500
                                                  Scale
                           £ ice melting ports all
                           around in thawing box
            
-------
67
                                                           vO
                                                           CM
                                                             (U
                                                             (1)
                                                             H
                                                             U
                                                            en
                                                             
-------
68
                                                 vO
                                                 CM
                                                   0)
                                                   H
                                                   3
                                                   4-1
                                                   O
                                                   0)
                                                   00
                                                   M
                                                   n)
                                                   j3
                                                   o
                                                   to
                                                   CN
                                                   c
                                                   o
                                                   •H
                                                   CSl
                                                   00

-------
                                                         69
                             o
—V
                         LU

                         CC
LU
O_
       0
cc     £-j o oo ^r o oo ^

"^     > £ LU "£  £ g] S

          l.?5o  Or^O
                                                    r? iC Q-  Z    CC

                                                    o 
-------
70
                                    o
                                    GO


                                    §
                                    4J
                                    (0
                                    >,
                                    co

                                    
-------
                                   71
            Specific details concerning the discharge-structure designs are
lacking.  It  is known that the structures will be located about 1198 ft offshore
and will be  submerged.  The lake depth at the discharge locations will be
about 16 ft.   Each structure will extend about 4 ft above the lake bottom
and will have two horizontal slot openings to  produce a water-jet exit ve-
locity of 1 3  fps. Details concerning the orientation of the jet openings are
not given.  Figure 15 shows a plan view in detail of the Cook circulating
water system. The cooling-water transit time from the circulating pump
discharge to the condenser inlet is about 35 sec. The transit time through
the condensers is  about 6  sec and from the condenser outlet to the point of
discharge into the lake is  about 184 sec.

            Winter-season deicing capability is provided by recirculating
a portion of the warmed discharge water from either Unit 1 or 2 through
the center 16-ft-dia intake pipe in which flow will be  reversed.   Close in-
spection of  Fig. 15 can show how this is accomplished by appropriately
manipulating roller gates  and sluice  gates in the screenhouse.   Specific
flow and temperature data for the cooling system operating in the winter
mode was not given.

       5.   Palisades  Plant Cooling System

            The schematic for the Palisades  Plant condenser cooling sys-
tem is shown in Fig. 16.  Cooling water is withdrawn from the  lake  at about
3300 ft offshore.  The  intake consists of a vertical 11-ft-dia pipe, with  its
opening located about 6 ft  from the lake bottom. A 60-ft-wide, 60-ft-long,
12-ft-high box is centrally located over the intake.  The box has a steel
plate for its top and 2-in.  vertical bars, spaced 10 in. apart, around the
sides.  The  trash rack located inside the screenhouse consists of a  grating
with vertical bars about 1  in. apart.  The discharge canal is a structure
about 37 ft wide at the shore, opening to 100 ft at the  point of discharge,
about 108 ft from shore.  The average discharge velocity across the 100-ft-
wide opening will generally be less than 2 fps.  The cooling-water transit
time from the condenser header to the point of discharge into the lake is
roughly 25 sec.

            During winter operation, about 17,000 gprn  of discharge water
will be withdrawn  from the discharge canal and returned to the  intake.
A special pump will be used for this  purpose.

B.  Biological Effects

       As stated in Section III.B, this section includes  summaries of studies
performed primarily in the intake and discharge canals. Similar types of
studies that included measurements in the lake part of  the plume are re-
ported in the above-mentioned section.  Therefore, reference to both sec-
tions will be necessary for a complete review.

-------
72
                                        CM

-------
73
                                                     (0
                                                     f^
                                                    CO


                                                     ^
                                                     (U
                                                     4-J
                                                     tfl

                                                    S


                                                     00
                                                     c
                                                     o
                                                     o
                                                    u

                                                     S-l
                                                     (U
                                                     at
                                                     c
                                                     o
                                                    o

                                                     CO
                                                     Hi
                                                    •d
                                                     a)
                                                     w
                                                     ca
                                                    PM
                                                     o
                                                    •H
                                                     B
                                                     OJ

-------
                                   74
       The biological effects on organisms passing through the pumps and
condensers were studied by the Bio-Test Laboratories at the Waukegan
Generating Station during 1971.72 Phytoplankton samples taken during this
period indicated no significant differences in total population densities be-
tween the intake and discharge canals. (Ayers et al. reported an apparent
10% phytoplankton kill in his Waukegan measurements. )

       Initial findings of the effects of zooplankton passing through the con-
densers   showed an average mortality of 5.8% due to mechanical  effects
and another 1.6% due to thermal stress.  (Comparisons were made with and
without heat addition in the condensers.)  Even in July and August, when the
discharge water reached a maximum temperature of 88°F, 90% of the zoo-
plankton  survived.  Other studies10'22'58'90 (some of which relate to salt-
water) were cited as showing that water temperatures below 99°F have little
effect on the survival rate of most zooplankton. However, they found  over
80% mortality when  this temperature was exceeded.72

       Size was found to be an important factor in the mortality rates.
Zooplankton exceeding a length of 0.9  mm suffered 17% mortality;  smaller
organisms suffered  only 4% mortality.72

       Reference 72 cited studies that showed, "Organisms subjected to a
sudden temperature rise occasionally assume a condition of complete in-
activity simulating death.  However, within a few hours after being returned
to temperatures far below their  lethal level,  these 'dormant1  organisms
would resume their  normal active conditions."23  The zooplankton popula-
tion at the Waukegan Station showed an average recovery rate of 1.4% 4 hr
after entrainment, resulting in a total mortality of only 6% from condenser
passage.72

       Preliminary studies at Waukegan indicated condenser passage had
little if any lethal effect on zooplankton egg viability. Results from Sep-
tember to  December 1971  showed, in  each of four species tested,  egg via-
bility increased from 1 to  7% as a result of passage  through the condenser.72

       Periphyton samples collected  from April  1970 to March 1971, from
artificial substrates in the Waukegan  intake and discharge canals,  indicated
more rapid growth in the warm discharge water during June and July. The
increased  growth was due  to nonfilamentous green algae, periphytic diatoms,
and filamentous blue-green algae, and not to forms of Cladophora. Growth
in the discharge canal was reduced during midsummer when water tempera-
tures exceeded 70°F.  After September the growth again  increased, but was
not as large as that  which occurred on substrates located away from the
influence of the warmed water.74

       Samples taken during  1971 (Ref. 72)  showed that, as in the  1970
study,74 the dominant members of the  periphyton community in both the

-------
                                   75
intake and discharge canals were diatoms.  Despite some differences in
distribution and abundance of particular species between the intake and
discharge,  the total species, composed mainly of diatoms, was often quite
similar. The green algae species, Stigeoclonium,  which was found to be
abundant in the discharge canal only in late June 1970, proliferated in both
canals in the 1971 sampling period. It was abundant in the intake when
temperatures ranged from 50 to 60°F, but also  grew well in the discharge
temperatures of 70-79°F.  Both the intake and discharge supported much
larger growths of periphyton in December 1971 than in December 1970.

       The thermal discharge from the Point Beach Nuclear Plant has been
the subject of a number of studies  since the unit went into operation in
December  1970.  Reference 128 describes a preliminary  study, primarily
to develop  experimental techniques, that used the two separate cooling sys-
tems to study the mechanical damage  and combined mechanical-thermal
damage on phytoplankton and zooplankton. Although experimental difficulties
were experienced, the preliminary results  indicated no significant mortality
to phytoplankton. Samples of zooplankton taken from the intake and discharge
of both units were similarly surveyed, and  results show that the physical
damage incurred by passage through the plant was more critical  than the
thermal impact.  That is, the lethal effects of heating and pumping were
essentially the same as the effects of  pumping alone. The percentage of
animals killed by the  entrainment experience varied from 8 to 19%, de-
pending upon the season.121

       Testimony given at the Wisconsin hearings125 by Dr. Wright,
Westinghouse Environmental Systems Department, described results of
studies  (unreferenced) by his organization at "a variety of locations through-
out the United States."  Problems related to flow were generally  more sig-
nificant than those related to the increased temperatures. Phytoplankton
survive both the passage through the condenser and the residual time in the
thermal plume and still maintain their photosynthetic activity. In some
cases, there was an increase in the productivity within the plume.  Depend-
ing on the species and life stages  sampled, a 5-20% loss in mobility of
zooplankton was observed as a result  of passage through the pumps and
condenser.

       Studies on whitefish egg entrainment and effects on phytoplankton
and zooplankton productivity, as a  result of passage through the intake
structures, pumps, and condensers, were reported by the EPA Grosse lie
Laboratory.44  Samples were  taken daily at the  Big Rock Nuclear Plant
during November 1971 and at the Escanaba Power  Plant during November 30-
December  4, 1971. These plants were chosen because of their proximity
to whitefish spawning grounds.

       After pumping more than 6 million gallons  of intake water at the
two plants, the investigators reported finding no eggs at the Big Rock intake

-------
                                   76
and an insignificant number in the Escanaba intake.  The results on phyto-
plankton productivity were inconclusive because of a low and variable
population density at  the intake.44

       The low live/dead zooplankton ratio at the  Big Rock Plant inlet
indicated that damage was inflicted on the zooplankton while being drawn
through the intake pipe  (2000 ft offshore) or  the population was adversely
affected  by severe storms during the sampling period.  The differences in
the live/dead ratios between the inlet and discharge was equivalent  to a
55% mortality of  the population observed. The mortality would be 29% if
the discharge live/dead ratio were applied to the forebay population.  They
concluded, "Regardless of whether the  mortality is 29 or 55%, there ap-
pears to be significant  population mortality."

       The live/dead zooplankton ratios obtained at the Escanaba Plant
were much higher than  those observed  at Big Rock.  The higher  survival
rate could have resulted because of less stress imposed upon the orga-
nisms  by the  shoreline  intake.  The data indicated a 7% mortality in
passing through the plant.

       Brauer _et al.    studied the influence of the intake and outfall on the
distribution and abundance of zooplankton in Lake Monona.  Sampling on
13 days in the summer  and fall of 1969 and 1970 showed that Diaptomus,
Daphnia and  cyclopoid  copepods were two to seven times  as abundant in
the water near the outfalls as in the control area. The  maximum zooplank-
ton density occurred  in or very near the discharge .currents, which sug-
gested that the animals were being brought into the plume area  rather than
being produced in situ.  Observations that a many-fold increase  in zooplank-
ton density took place in periods as short as 6 hr  after  the pumps were
started,  plus  the  fact that the ratio of young to adult, animals in  the  outfall
samples was  not  noticeably high, support the conclusion that the organisms
were brought into the area via the intake. This continuous input of  zoo-
plankton simulated a  rapid local production  of zooplankton and probably
contributes to a higher  concentration of fishes in the outfall area than in
the reference area.16

        The  studies indicated that judicious location of intakes (at a depth
of minimum  organism  densities) is  one way in which a power company
could reduce  its  biological  effects.

        Personnel of  the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources col-
lected samples from the  Point Beach discharge  canal to determine  to what
extent fish eggs and fry were drawn through the cooling-water system.76
Samples were collected on 14 days during March 3-May 27, 1971. The
specimens recovered consisted  of one  sculpin (partially deteriorated), a
few smelt eggs, and one salmonid egg  (white).  Since whitefish and lake
herring  are late  fall  and  winter  spawners, the sampling was discontinued

-------
                                   77
until November, at which time sampling was performed twice a week until
March 1972. This  time the specimens consisted of 4-| smelt (2-3 in.),
two salmonid eggs  (white), and one small unidentified egg.  The investi-
gators concluded from these studies that the intake and discharge structures
from the Point Beach Unit No. 1  are of negligible concern to the spawning
grounds, eggs, and fry of whitefish and lake herring in Lake Michigan.

       Operating experience with entrainment of fish during interim opera-
tion at low power is summarized in Ref.  119 for the Palisades Nuclear
Plant.  The principal mortality was sculpins in January and February 1972.
The total number of fish impinged on the screens and counted daily from
February 24 to March 26, 1972,  ranged from zero for 22  days up to 15  per
day for 10  days.119

       A large fish kill was repo'rted  at the J. H. Campbell Plant in early
February 1971.  The circumstances were summarized in a  Michigan Water
Resources Commission memorandum.    (1) The problem had existed  for
7-10 days.  (2) A rough estimate was that several hundred thousand fish had
been killed by impingement on the screens. (3) The species were mostly
gizzard shad,  with  some alewives and yellow perch. It was speculated  that
attraction  of fish to the warm water that was  discharged to  prevent ice jams
in the intake channel was the cause of the problem.

       The occurrence of gas-bubble  disease in fish in the  discharge of a
power  plant in North Carolina was  reported by the North  Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission.   Gas-bubble disease can occur when the blood of
a fish becomes supersaturated with gases. This condition may result when
a fish at equilibrium with air-saturated water is subjected to an increase
in temperature, a decrease in pressure,  or both. More commonly, gas-
bubble disease develops when a fish is exposed to an environment super-
                              •30
saturated with dissolved gases.

       Gill nets, electrofishing,  and midwater trawls were  used to obtain
monthly fish samples at the Duke Power  Company Marshall Steam Station.
Three  species of fish were found to be afflicted with the disease during the
winter of 1969-1970, whereas 13 species showed symptons during the winter
of 1970-1971.   "Pop-eye" was the major  diagnostic feature  observed in the
majority of cases.  Relatively few fishes had bubbles on their head or fins,
                             TO
or in the mouth or the viscera.

       Several fish mortalities involving  a few hundred black crappie were
observed during late February 1971.  The  symptoms exhibited by the dying
fishes  implicated gas-bubble disease as a principal factor.3

       Marcy137 reported on the  survival  of fish larvae in the discharge
canal of the Connecticut Yankee  Atomic Power Plant.  The plant cooling
water, heated  to about 22°F above ambient river water, is discharged into

-------
                                  78
a 1.14 mile long canal before returning to the Connecticut River.  Non-
screenable fish larvae less than 0.6 in. in length, were sampled at the
plant intake and discharge, and at three points along the canal.  The studies
revealed that no fish of nine species entrained in the  condenser cooling-
water system survived passage to the lower end of the canal when water
temperatures were above 86°F.  The survival rate  immediately after
passing through the plant was 34.5% when the discharge temperature was
82°F and 16.6% when the discharge temperature was 92°F.  The majority of
dead specimens were mangled, and this condition was more apparent in
larger specimens.  When the discharge temperature was 95°F, 100% mor-
tality occurred during passage through the plant.

-------
                                   79


                V.  ALTERNATIVE COOLING METHODS

A.  Environmental Impact

       At the September 28, 1970, Workshop Session of the Third Lake Michi-
gan Enforcement Conference, a report, entitled "Feasibility of Alternative
Means of Cooling  for Thermal Power Plants Near Lake Michigan" was
entered into  record  by Federal EPA representatives.  The object of this
report was to establish the engineering and economic feasibility of various
closed-cycle condenser cooling methods that could alternatively be  used  in
the place of once-through cooling. The report  examined the situation for
a modern 40% efficient 1000-MWe fossil plant (or some plant with an equiva-
lent thermal discharge loading) sited along four shoreline reaches of
Lake  Michigan.  The alternatives considered were:  mechanical and natural-
draft  evaporative  cooling towers, mechanical and natural-draft "dry"  cooling
towers, cooling  ponds, and  spray canals.  Representative meteorological data
for the four reaches of the  lake were obtained and then used as input data
to computer  codes to generate engineering performance and monetary cost
data for  the alternatives.

       The report concluded that the alternative cooling systems considered
are feasible  alternatives to once-through cooling around Lake Michigan, and
the impact of alternative cooling systems on the environment appears to be
minor.  Those potential problems that do exist with the alternatives could
be avoided, or at least alleviated, through proper site  selection and engi-
neering design.

       Several  specific studies have been made concerning the possible
environmental impact of alternative  cooling systems for the major nuclear
power stations sited on the Great Lakes.  Presently, four of the 12 U.S.
nuclear stations, either operating or under construction on  the Great  Lakes,
will use  closed-cycle  cooling in the form of evaporative towers. Two of
these plants  are situated along Lake Michigan, and the  other two on Lake Erie.
Although this report is primarily concerned with Lake  Michigan, it was
felt that  much of the environmental  rationale concerning the installation of
closed-cycle cooling at the two Lake Erie plants could  be equally germane
to Lake Michigan  issues.

       The following pages contain  information extracted either from util-
ity environmental  reports or from U.S. AEC environmental  statements made
on nuclear power  plants pursuant to the National Environmental. Policy  Act
of 1969.  The information is qualitative in nature. Nevertheless, this  infor-
mation is presented to give the reader additional perspective on the environ-
mental issues surrounding  closed-cycle cooling.

       1.   Davis-Besse Station

            The 915-MWe Davis-Besse Station, on Lake Erie, will use a
single 493-ft-tall  natural-draft tower.115  Studies of the climatic effects  of

-------
                                  80
an earlier proposed 370-ft tower, by Travelers Research Corporation,
indicated that the tower would "emit a highly visible but elevated plume,
which will, on the average, persist 1.2-2.3 miles downwind. It may, in
cold weather, persist as much as 20 miles downwind an estimated 6% of
the time (22 days)." The visible plume would touch the ground less than
2% of the time, on an annual basis.  During rare winter conditions the  tower
plume  could cause  some icing on structures at or near ground level, at a
distance of 1-2 miles from the tower, in the downwind direction.

           More recent studies  were performed by NUS Corporation for the
actual  493-ft-high tower under construction at the  Besse site.115  Two-year
site  meteorological data were correlated with Toledo meteorological data,
which, in turn, were used to predict the environmental effects of  the opera-
tion of the cooling tower. Computer codes were used to calculate plume
rise, dispersion, and transport on an hourly basis  upon input of hourly
meteorological data. The results were examined to determine consistency
with the actual Besse site meteorological data and the occurrence of local-
ized lake breeze effects,  and also to assess anomalous situations of plume
downwash. The NUS analysis concluded that the average visible vapor
plume  would  be 1.5 miles long.   Visible plumes longer than 5  miles were
estimated to  occur  only 3% of the total hours of the year.  As  long as  the
plume  remained aloft during these periods, the plumes would  represent
only an aesthetic problem.

           It was further estimated that there could be a maximum annual
increase of 3.5 hr in the occurrence of fog  conditions resulting from tower
operation.  An annual average of 831 hr of fog occurs naturally; therefore
the 3.5-hr figure represents a 0.42% increase.  The increased occurrence
of fog  conditions does not represent discrete cases of induced fog, but
rather the possibility of fog occurring earlier and  lasting longer  thannormal.
Lake breeze effects could increase the possibility of fog calculated for the
study;  however, this effect was not considered to be significant.

           Predicted increases  in induced fog under icing conditions were
estimated to  be less than 1 min at maximum.  Lake breeze effects were not
considered to change the  icing calculations since the lake breeze is not a
major  effect  during the winter, when the lake surface is generally warmer
than the land surface.

           Downwash conditions resulting  in the plume being brought to
ground elevation were calculated to occur as often as 12.8% of the time
(l 121 hr/yr), with most hours occurring under offshore winds. The winter
downwash could possibly result in icing on surfaces less than 3000 ft away
at a rate of 0.03-0.07 in.  of ice per  hour.  These downwash calculations
reflected maximum limits of occurrence and actual observations at operating
natural draft towers in this country have not confirmed downwash behavior.

-------
                                   81
            The Environmental Report115 stated that the temperature excess
of blow down effluent over the ambient Lake Erie receiving water will be
limited  to a maximum of 20°F by supplying ambient lake water to a collecting
basin to dilute the tower blowdown. The maximum quantity of heat dis-
charged to the lake is expected to be no greater than 1.38 x 108 Btu/hr, as
opposed to 62.10 x 108 Btu/hr for once-through cooling. This corresponds
to a 45 to 1 reduction in heat input to the lake.  The blowdown will enter the
lake through an  offshore high-velocity discharge with a normal flow of
9225 gpm.  On occasions the  flow may reach as high as 13,800 gpm.

            Tower drift was estimated to be a negligible problem since the
expected drift losses would be 0.01% of the tower  circulating flow, or 48 gpm.
For an assumed tower  concentration factor of two and  an assumed lake water
salt content of 225 ppm, the  maximum amount of salt deposited on the land
was estimated to be 3.7 x 10~4 (lb/yr)/sq ft, assuming  a uniform  salt distri-
bution over a 10-square-mile area. Assuming a 30.5-in. annual rainfall,
the salt concentration was estimated to be  2 ppm if  all  the salt  deposited
was taken by the rain.  Terrestrial effects arising from drift losses were
therefore assumed to be of little  concern.

            The Environmental Report also addressed  the potential impact
of the tower  on  bird kills.115  Collision kills with the tower by migratory
waterfowl were  considered to be  most likely at night or during times of
heavy fog,  but in any event, they were assumed to be minor in relation to
the total migratory populations.  Resident birds were not expected to be
destroyed by collisions with the tower.

        2.   Enrico Fermi Plant

            The Fermi Plant environmental report indicates that two
natural-draft evaporative towers, approximately 400 ft high, will be used
for condenser cooling.39  The report stated that the  possible effects of the
towers  on the local environment can be conveniently considered to be of
two kinds:  (l) presence of water from the  towers in the form of plumes,
fog, icing,  or precipitation; and (2) influence on natural condensation and
precipitation processes.  The report states,  "The quantitative assessment
of the two kinds of effects at this time can  be made  only from observations
of releases from similar cooling towers in similar  climates and from
incomplete theoretical calculations."

            Two early independent analyses of the extent of the tower
plumes  indicated that an airport two miles west of the  plant might be
influenced at most by 8-18 hr/yr. The diffusion models used to calculate
these distances  were credited with yielding unusually conservative values
because they did not  take into account the plume's inherent buoyancy.
Additional estimates of the plume's horizontal extent were gained from
observations of the Keystone natural-draft towers in western Pennsylvania.

-------
                                   82
For a six-month observational period, the plumes on only  11 different days
extended as much  as a mile.  Although the climate in the Keystone plant
area is  somewhat  different from that of southeastern Michigan, it is be-
lieved that the Keystone information offers a realistic idea of what can be
expected at the Fermi site.39

            Minor modifications  of the microclimate  in the vicinity of the
Fermi site, resulting from plume shadowing, were anticipated. However,
the actual effects or the magnitude of  these  effects has not been assessed.
Fog formation was only discussed in a qualitative way. The  inference was
that it would take an unusual set  of meteorological conditions to bring the
tower plumes to the ground.

            Ground icing conditions were stated to possibly arise under
either of the following conditions:  (l) With strong winds (>25 mph), there
is a potential of downwash icing in the immediate vicinity of the towers,
provided that there is the additional joint occurrence that objects downwind
are below 32°F and the atmosphere has a high relative humidity.  An analy-
sis of 10-yr records of hourly observations at the Detroit  City Airport
showed that the  joint occurrence of the above-mentioned conditions occurred
for less than 0.1% of the observations.  In any event,  the extent of icing in
this manner should be confined to an area two to four tower heights down-
wind. (2) Lake breeze  circulations during early spring were also hypothe-
sized as being the second possible means for causing ground icing. No
estimates were  given as to the potential number or duration of these periods.
This issue, according to the report, awaits successful application of numer-
ical models presently being formulated.

            Comparative calculations  were made assuming that if all the
water evaporated from both towers over a year were evenly deposited over
a 25-square-mile area, it would amount to 1.4 in. of  precipitation. This  is
compared with a normal annual rate of about 31 in.  The report went on to
state that observations of actual cooling towers  rarely show observable
precipitation, and when precipitation did occur, it was not  established
whether it was the result of natural processes being  stimulated by tower
effluent.

            The influence of tower effluents on natural condensation and
precipitation processes was discussed. Although the total amount of heat
and water  released from a cooling tower is  small in  comparison to a small
shower, the nature of the atmosphere  is such that at  times small.perturba-
tions may  give rise to more extensive reactions.  Several  were enumerated
and discussed:

            a.   Cumulus or stratocumulus  clouds induced to form sooner,
                or last longer, or grow denser and deeper.
            b.   Natural fog induced to last longer.

-------
                                   83


           c.   Natural precipitation induced to increase locally at other
                times.
           d.   Thunderstorm activity induced to either increase or de-
                crease, depending on the nature of the atmosphere.

Our understanding of the natural process of condensation and precipitation
is far from complete.39  Therefore the extent to which a cooling tower
affects the above processes cannot be reliably estimated from a theoretical
standpoint.  However, actual observations show that increases in local
cloudiness are common in some areas.  Changes in precipitation were
small and much less  frequent.  Additionally, no reports  of thunderstorm
modifications are known to date.  Further elaboration on the above four
items was  given within the report39 but, again, only from a qualitative
viewpoint.

           Tower blowdown is  returned to Lake  Erie at the shoreline.  The
blowdown's temperature excess is expected to range  between 12 and 23°F.
The maximum heat discharged in this manner is  expected to be less than
0.78 x 108 Btu/hr, or 1.5% of the once-through requirement.  The  returned
water will  have roughly three times the concentration of dissolved solids
(500 ppm) than appear locally in the lake.  Additionally,  free chlorine will
be present in concentrations estimated to  be less than 0.1 ppm.

           It is estimated that  a maximum total  of 19,500 gpm will be
evaporated and lost by  drift from the  towers and a  small pond used in the
closed cooling system.   Drift from both towers is expected to be less than
a maximum of 0.1% of the  tower circulating flow.  By assuming the 0.1%
figure, together with  a  solids-concentration factor  of three, the investiga-
tors estimated that the dissolved solids emitted to the atmosphere would
be less than  5300 Ib per day.

       3.   Zion Station

           Several recent studies have investigated  closed-cycle cooling
systems  for  nuclear  power plants along Lake Michigan.  The  first  such
study was that of the  Sierra Research Corporation in which evaluations
were  made to determine the possible  environmental impact of operating the
2200-MWe Zion Nuclear Generating Station with evaporative cooling towers .2
Several cooling-tower configurations  were considered for the Zion site:
70 mechanical-draft  tower cells, each 60 ft high, 70 ft wide, and 40 ft deep;
10 combination mechanical-natural-draft towers  250  ft high and 300 ft  in
diameter; five natural-draft towers, 350 ft high and about 300 ft in diameter;
and three natural draft towers 500 ft high and about 500  ft in diameter.

           Basically, the  calculations made for fog frequencies required
the input of tower design parameters  together with historical meteorological
data for the Zion site.  Since the requisite meteorological data were not

-------
                                  84
available for the Zion site, recourse was made to U.S. Weather Bureau
data, gathered at the Chicago (Midway) and Milwaukee airports, which pro-
vided tabulations of the frequency of various combinations of temperature,
humidity,  and wind speed.  Atmospheric stability and wind assessments
required for the tower fog calculations were obtained from determinations
made by the NUS corporation for the Zion plant in relation to radiological
dispersion issues.

            The results show that ground fog, as a result of mechanical-
draft tower operation,  could  be expected somewhere around the plant
(which may include Lake Michigan as well) a maximum of 650 hr/yr.  It
was stated that a ±20% variation in this number could be expected in any
given year due  to natural variability.  The maximum frequency at any one
point was  calculated to be 90 hr/yr at 1.5-2.5 miles north of  the  plant
using Milwaukee meteorological data.  Chicago meteorological data also
show a maximum frequency in that location but only  50 hr/yr. Using
either  the Chicago or Milwaukee  data, the investigators predicted that
fogging would most likely occur from northwest through the north and
easterly directions.  Predicted fog frequency is least to the \\eot of Zion
station. Fog-frequency estimates as a result of tower operation  for various
towns or locations were given as: Waukegan Airport, 20-40 hr/yr; the
town of Zion, about 25  hr/yr; Waukegan,  18 hr/yr; Winthrop Harbor  and
along highways northwest of  the site, 40-60 hr/yr; and the lake shore
1-2 miles north of the  plant, 50-90 hr/yr.

            Most occurrences of fog would be between 0 and 34°F. The
winter  months, December, January, February, and March, show the highest
fog frequency; June, July, and August the least. The most favorable hours
for fog formation are from 3 to 7  A.M. The greatest  majority of all
cooling-tower fogs should be observed between 12 midnight and 10 A.M.
Most fogging episodes  were  said to  be short-lived, with a  duration of
2-4 hr. Very few  situations  are expected with a persistence over 6 hr.
A fog duration of up to  12 hr or more could infrequently occur when the
tower fog  mixes with natural fog.  The report concludes that if an average
duration of 3 hr is assumed  for a  fogging episode as a result of tower opera-
tion, then  the mechanical-draft towers would produce ground fog  on a  maxi-
mum of 25 days/yr at any one point.

            The fog frequencies computed for the taller towers were  con-
siderably lower, decreasing  with tower height.  For the 500-ft-tall towers,
estimated ground fog frequencies  ranged from 5-40 hr/yr, the distance of
maximum frequency being 12.4 miles from the site.  Ground-fog  frequencies
for the 350-ft towers were estimated to occur  between 15  and 75  hr/yr,
9.31 miles being the distance of maximum frequency.  Fog frequencies for
the 250-ft tower were  25-100 hr/yr, the distance of maximum frequency
being 7.4  miles.  With fog persistence of 2-4 hr, individual fog episodes
were expected to occur 5-30 days/yr with these taller towers. The pre-
dicted ground-fog  frequencies are significantly lower with increasing  tower

-------
                                   85
height, and when fog does occur it generally occurs further from the plant
with increasing height. However, because ground-fog frequencies are less
with the taller  towers, this  does not imply that the tower plumes will dissi-
pate close to towers.  Rather, plumes from the towers will frequently per-
sist for distances as great as 10-20 miles, but only rarely will these plumes
contact the ground.  The distribution of fog from these taller towers with
respect to the time of the day, the month, and the direction were stated to
be similar to the mechanical-draft situation.

           A summary chapter in the Sierra Report was  devoted to inter-
preting the results.  Although the physics of the  problem formulation is
based on accepted and understood models, these models nevertheless have
never been verified against long-term tower tests and should therefore be
interpreted as  state-of-the-art  estimates.  It was  estimated that the calcu-
lated values should be correct to-within ±25%, at a confidence level  of 95%.

           Natural fog at Milwaukee and Chicago  (Midway) averages 260 and
160 hr/yr, respectively.  It was estimated that about 35%  of the  tower-fog
cases \vould coincide with measurable natural fog.  When  fogs occur together,
the fog density would naturally be greater in the tower plume.  In general,
the intensity  of the fog at the ground under such  situations should produce
visibilities in range  of 200-1000 ft, that of dense natural fog.

           Since most tower fogs would occur when temperatures are
below freezing, some  icing  was anticipated whenever the supercooled fog
made contact with solid objects at the ambient temperature. But, because
fog situations will seldom last longer than several hours, heavy icing of the
kind that would endanger vegetation or  structures would not be expected.
The report cautioned,  however,  that any icing  on highways  could be a
serious hazard.

           The Sierra report mentioned that under certain wind conditions
downwash and aerodynamic distortion,  not only from the towers themselves
but also from nearby plant building  structures, could to a small extent
increase the  frequency of ground fog.  The number of such incidents would
decrease with increasing tower height.  Such effects could be minimized
with the 500-ft towers.

           The Environmental  Report26  summarized additional problems
that could result from cooling-tower operation.  Since  the  Waukegan air-
port is about 3.25 miles  away, it was suggested that both the vapor plumes
and tall towers, if used,  could represent aircraft hazards.  It was further
suggested that  the water evaporated by the towers (66 cfs) might legally be
construed as a Chicago area water diversion and hence apply against the
3200 cfs  internationally allocated for the Illinois-Lake Michigan diversion.
The report additionally pointed to the undesirable  aesthetic impact of
either  the resultant tower plumes or the towers  themselves, particularly

-------
                                   86
the taller ones. Tower blowdown and drift problems were not pointed to as
being significantly consequential. The blowdown thermal-discharge rate to
the lake would be  roughly 0.96 x 108 Btu/hr, compared to 150 x  108 Btu/hr
for once-through cooling.

            Several other alternative  closed-cycle cooling systems were
investigated for the Zion station:  a 3000-acre cooling pond, a 300-acre
spray pond, and dry cooling towers.  The  3000-acre pond was ruled out
because land use in the area precluded everything except a possible loca-
tion several miles west  of the site.  Because of  elevation changes and
distances involved, the pumping-energy requirements of this alternative
would reduce  the capability of the station  more than any other evaporative -
type alternative.  In addition, the  pond site would require a number of
residences  and farms to be displaced. The 300-acre spray-pond alternative
was rejected, partially because of available land limitations and partially
because potentially severe fogging and icing problems were anticipated.
The dry cooling towers were  rejected as being viable alternatives, primarily
because of excessive costs.

            The Illinois  State Water Survey published a document summa-
rizing their findings concerning the potential effects of cooling-tower efflu-
ents on the  atmosphere with emphasis on  the Zion Plant.    A literature
search was  made  covering basically three topical areas:  fog and icing,
clouds and precipitation, and severe weather. More attention had been
given in the literature to fog and icing problems associated with tower
effluents than any other  potential weather effects. The report stated that,
"The majority opinion appears to be that fog and icing are usually minor
problems with natural-draft towers employing evaporative  cooling, since
these towers usually extend to heights of 350 ft or more into the atmosphere
so that the plume  seldom,  if ever, sinks to ground level.  Mechanical-type
towers release their effluent at a much lower level (50-75 ft) and in a much
more turbulent condition due to fan-forced ejection, so that there appears to
be a high probability of tower-induced fog and icing at or near  the ground
on occasions.  However, the frequency of  such occurrences cannot be
assessed accurately with existing observational data."

            Very little quantitative data on the effects  of cooling towers on
clouds and precipitation could be found.  The report stated, "Occasional
observations of light drizzle or snow attributed  to tower effluents have
been reported.  Also, there have been several reports of tower  plume  con-
tributing to cloud  formation downwind; apparently, these are usually
stratus-type clouds  and  observations of cumulus developments have been
rare. A few mathematical calculations have been made to determine the
cloud and precipitation producing potential of cooling tower plumes, but no
meteorologically acceptable analyses have been made  to assess  quantita-
tively the possibility that these plumes augment precipitation and cloud
systems associated with naturally occurring storms."62

-------
                                   87
            The literature provided little information on any observed or
calculated effects of towers on severe weather.  The report concluded,
"From consideration of atmospheric physics and dynamics, one would
expect that any severe weather event resulting from cooling tower effluents
would be attained only through a triggering or stimulation effect."  In another
paragraph the report went on to state, "In general, we conclude from avail-
able information in the literature that  a very distinct void exists in our
knowledge of the effects of cooling tower  plumes on clouds and precipitation,
with regard to both initiation and stimulation of these weather events.
From climatological observations and cloud physics research, it is known
that cumulus clouds and rain showers  or  thunderstorms  can be triggered by
small inputs of energy.  Consequently, it  is extremely important that re-
search be initiated to  combine existing knowledge of plume  and cloud prop-
erties  into mathematical models that will provide reliable quantitative
estimates of the plume effect on downwind clouds and rainfall."

            The report summarized several specific findings related to
Zion itself. Calculations showed that the amount of moisture that could be
added to the atmosphere from Zion would be very small  compared to
natural fluxes in storm clouds.  However, the addition of tower effluents
could occasionally result in additional precipitation and possibly other
undesirable intensification of naturally occurring weather events.

            The meteorological effects from the interaction between
cooling-tower effluents and lake breezes  in the  Zion area were stated to
"likely result in additional snowfall under certain synoptic weather
conditions." The  analyses  indicated that  in spring "there would be days
where  a  cooling tower plume would thicken on existing naturally occurring
fog, but most  of the  time this fog would not persist more than 1  to 2 miles
inland.  Only very occasionally would a weather situation exist in which
convective storms could be intensified by the lake breeze-tower  plume
interaction.  Again,  the general conclusion must be  that accumulated
knowledge is insufficient at this time to define in quantitative terms the
effects of the  interaction of cooling tower plumes with a  lake-influenced
atmosphere."62

            A numerical model was used  to estimate the amount of additional
rain or snow, under steady light rain or  snow conditions, that would result
from tower operation at Zion.  The results showed that the tower plume
could lead to a small rainfall  (trace amounts) within a few thousand feet of
the tower.  The  additional rainfall amounts were said to  be trivial, a fraction
of 1% annually.  Predictions on snowfall indicated that the total annual snow-
fall would be increased 1-2 in. within this lake-effect zone.  There were also
some indications using the model that  the tower  plumes could trigger a
thunderstorm under special weather conditions.

-------
                                   88
            Under a section titled, "General Conclusions and Recommenda-
tions" the report stated, "At this time meteorologists have not acquired
adequate information to define in quantitative terms the meteorological
consequences of the large amounts of heat energy and water vapor that are
released into the atmosphere from cooling towers associated with nuclear
power plants. The interaction between tower effluent and the atmosphere
is very  complex and dependent upon local conditions of climate and topog-
raphy	  Although it was not the purpose of this report to compare the
meteorological consequences of lake and atmospheric  dissipation of waste
heat, the authors consider it appropriate at this point to  present  several
relevant facts pertaining to this problem. First, it is  much more difficult
to establish the meteorological consequences of atmospheric dissipation
of waste heat from large nuclear power plants than it is  to evaluate the
meteorological ramifications of once-through cooling on Lake Michigan.
This is  because in both time and space the lake  is much  more stable with
respect to its meteorological properties	  Secondly,  the lake  cooling
spreads out the heat dissipation over a much longer time period  than
cooling  towers and, therefore, localized effects  on the weather are likely
to be less pronounced with lake cooling  than with cooling towers.  Strictly
from the meteorological standpoint, it appears  that environmental effects
are likely to be no greater, and probably smaller, with dissipation of
waste heat into Lake Michigan compared with atmospheric release from
cooling  towers."62

       4.   Point  Beach Station

            Alternate  closed-cycle cooling systems were investigated for
potential use at the  1046-MWe Point Beach nuclear station in Wisconsin.129
It was estimated than  an 850-acre pond would be required for this purpose.
The  most significant environmental impact of this alternative was stated
to be the elimination of land resources that presently support agricultural
activities and small-game shelters.

            With evaporative cooling towers, it was  recognized that
natural-draft tower plumes seldom return to the ground; thus the occur-
rence of ground-level fog or icing would be negligible.  Some enhancement
of cloud formation and precipitation was suggested.  Two natural-draft
towers, each 370 ft high and 400 ft in diameter,  were contemplated for the
Plant.  With the natural-draft towers, it was  stated that  there would be a
significant objectionable aesthetic impact.  The  towers would be  three
times the height of the tallest existing structures.  With  mechanical-draft
towers the occurrence of fog would be more frequent.  Four tower assem-
blies, each  73 ft wide, 60 ft high,  and 360 ft long, were considered.

            The report129 indicates that the normally observed ground fogs
are quite thin near the lake and suggests that the fogs  created by
mechanical-draft  towers would probably extend from the ground  to the tops
of the towers and  for a considerable distance downwind of the towers.

-------
                                   89
Conditions favoring this occurrence "would be limited mixing or inversion
breakup (fumigation)."  Whenever onshore  breezes were present, there
would be the likelihood that some of the moisture from the towers "could
settle on forests and crop lands.  When ambient temperatures are low
enough, the moisture could freeze on tree limbs and lower story vegetation
and could affect the wildlife cover."  It was also indicated that "there would
undoubtedly be some effect on seasonal crop  characteristics due to increased
moisture."  The environmental impact for  the alternative cooling systems is
contrasted against once-through cooling in Table 6.129

            In the Point Beach Environmental Statement,121 it was estimated
that a visible tower plume would be seen during much of the  year: at least
50% of the year for mechanical draft towers and 95%  of the year for natural-
draft towers. Most of the plumes would occur close to the facility. How-
ever, under restrictive conditions the plumes could extend downwind as  far
as 30-40 miles  for the natural-draft towers and as far as 15-20 miles for
the mechanical-draft towers.  Although the actual size of the plume and the
distance it persists depend on meteorological factors, the plume will roughly
be cigar-shaped and, under restrictive conditions, would have a maximum
width of about 2 miles and maximum depth of about 1000 ft.  Further, it
was anticipated that cooling towers would increase the amount of fog at  a
particular point on the order  of 1-11 and 5-75 hr/yr at the point of maxi-
mum effect for  natural and mechanical draft  towers,  respectively.

            Ground-fog calculations for the alternative 850-acre cooling
pond indicated that ground plumes would extend from the  pond to  1, 5, and
10 miles on the order of 45, 30, and 5 hr/yr,  respectively.121  The maximum
number of hours per  year of fog due to the cooling pond at any point at
1, 5, and  10 miles is  estimated to be 8, 5, and less than 1 hr/yr, respec-
tively. Pond fogging  will occur almost exclusively in the winter,  and the
incremental environmental impact in terms of contributing to reduced
visibility  and icing should be  inconsequential in relation to the occurrence
of natural fog.

            A spray canal system was  additionally investigated.  The plant
would require a 30-acre canal with about  140 spray modules. A crude
analysis was performed which indicated that  potential fogging and icing
resulted in  occurrences of approximately 150, 80, 20, 4 hr/yr at  1/2, 1,
5, and 10  miles  from the canal, respectively.121

       5.   Kewaunee Plant

            Several closed-cycle  alternative  cooling systems were investi-
gated in relationship to the 540-MWe Kewaunee Plant in Wisconsin.130
A single 450-ft-high, 480-ft-dia, natural-draft evaporative tower and
three parallel banks of mechanical-draft towers, each bank 50 by 350 ft,
were proposed as alternatives to  once-through cooling.  In a Westinghouse
study concerning evaporative towers for the Kewaunee site, the potential

-------
                                                                          90
        M-J
        O
                                 •8
                                  8
o>
i-H
I/)

I


fn
VI
g.
oo
«
!M
1
O

I
rS
I/I
•rH
U
rH
&1
i> o> u,
.c,Q 4-t
•iH'H O
V) VI
l/l V) QJ
w£ 3
•K
i_
 -H
"§

CO 00
ll
4-1
s-£ 1
HO H
?•*= if
1
t-i

CO
3!
Vi
Q
2
U
rt

CO
V)
1
r-
0>

1
00 ft)
g 3
rH U "-I
rt rt *->
1 ff
I S'S
1 (Sa
I

fi-
ll
ss

.5 «
ft) C/)
VI I
rt oo
4> C
s- -a
(_) O i
.s§
Jl— 1 >
c
CO
to
•H
U
1

i-H
i nj
I



4-*
U
to

ft)
rH
•H
00
rH
00
QJ

o
in
t-H
rt
u
i
•5
p
1
1
1

habitat
4J
t/1
1

4-1
O
g"1 flJ
.H-S
4-> r-4
O X
ecosyst*

rrestrial
4J
0

u
rt
.!
ft>
r^


1
.5
d)
o>
t-
C

4jJ
3
                                         .8
                                          a.
         CO
         M
         o
        u
         o
         CO
         C
         O
         a
         
23
w E
*j T) i
^•3
i-s
•H

00 g 0) <
rt rH 'Zl
-J D. W
V
+-t
rt
Q
QJ
QJ
>H
*-*


X
>+*
rH
4->
1
DO
C
u
rt
u
O

i
JD

>
V)

a.
Ic
o
r- H
00 00
H QJ
1 ^

I 1
D. +-*
O ~»
to
*-i *->
rt *O
V) rH
I/) 3
S i



u
1
00
H
rH
00
3
4-*
V)
rt
1
i

I!
i-H
(D
y
rH I
o
4-*

$ «
1
3 '
H 4
VI
1
I/I
S
IH
4-)
O
4-*
U
t
g, 1
•S 2
-* H 4-1
) C t3
> a 2




i
1/1
0
i-H
rt
• H
1
U-l
C
0)
(/)
g
•H
S

•K
 ta
H
         oo
         o
         o
        a)

        S-4
        (U
                             *-»  V)  X

                             S  5  -
                                 U  O  ,
                                    B^D  I
                                 X  M r
         QJ
      o< 
js   ^a  s
                                                                 S^f  o
                                                                 Q) O C8 7:
,5-grt-  Ss   S.-5  §
 S 4^  ~  '
 QJ rH  __ „
—• C    j: T3
   •H  jr  u i~i
   u  oo3  3
                                                                                                          I >  I 4J
                                       QJ C

                                         O i
                                         QJ  <0

                                 E  BE?  ^
                                 QJ  C  rt  QJ
                                 4->  4-> JC,  ^
                                 vi  «13
                                 X    VI  rH
                                 VI  4) 'H  «

                                 -  IS-0  g
                                                S  S
                                                0)  aj
                              C  QJ  *-) O

                             I?**


S
a,
s



*S ilon-
Ct ract ion for water-
rt
0)
ll
1 5 conservation
possible
rt en
C 
U 4-> 4->
S Ji
not presently

u
6


1
1
i
s
rt
u

l|
i rt
                                                                                                                    •a   "

-------
                                  91
environmental impact of such towers was  discussed and most of the following
material on towers have been abstracted from this  report.
1Z4
            The meteorological effects of evaporative towers were con-
sidered. Icing and fogging could occur and cause problems on nearby roads
or in the plant's electrical switchyard about 10 days annually. This did not
count the number of times the tower plumes might influence natural fogging
or icing conditions by making them more  severe or of longer duration in
the vicinity. Cooling-tower drift problems were discussed and implied to
be of minimal consequence off site.  Except for certain tower chemicals,
"Watering lawns in residential areas with average city water would result
in as much  or more dissolved solids deposit as would drift from, cooling
towers  using Lake Michigan water." Drift was calculated to add roughly
400 Ib of dissolved solids per year in the plant vicinity.

            Slowdown, while singled out as an environmental issue, was
only discussed briefly by noting that it contains not only increased con-
centrations  of dissolved solids, but also some chemicals.

            The Westinghouse report additionally provided a quantitative
evaluation of the potential biological impact of cooling towers as contrasted
against  once-through cooling  for the Kewaunee Plant.  Through a series of
rather simple calculations and arguments, it was shown, based on con-
servatively  assumed population, fractional capture, and  mortality estimates,
that a maximum fish kill of 7650 Ib/yr can be  expected with once-through
cooling. Closed-cycle tower  cooling was  stated to result in zero fish kill.
The fish-kill equivalent  of plankton mortality  (including  meroplankton)
resulting from plant operation was also calculated using estimated values
of lake  plankton biomass, cooling-system flow rates, fractional losses in
the condenser and in the towers and plumes, and a two-to-one fish-to-
plankton-kill biomass ratio.   The  estimated maximum values of fish kill
due to once-through and closed-cycle cooling  were  2900 and 236 Ib/yr,
respectively.  The net estimated overall fish and fish-equivalent kill
range was stated to be 1680-10,550 Ib for once-through cooling and 120-
270 Ib for closed-cycle cooling.  10,550 Ib/yr  represents an average of
30 Ib/day.   A calculation was made to show that the increased fuel-energy
cost alone,  resulting from closed-cycle tower operation versus once-
through cooling, amounts to $600,000/yr.  This figure corresponds to a
biological cost of  10,550 minus 270 or 10,280  Ib of fish per year, or about
$60/lb.  This figure was then compared to the cost  of fish produced at a.
hatchery, $1.50/lb.  The report concluded that, "The  great disparity in
the cost per pound of fish suggests that better commitment of total resources
could be made  by building fish hatcheries instead of cooling towers."  The
environmental  impact of various alternative cooling-tower schemes for the
Kewaunee Plant is summarized in Table 7 as  abstracted from the Westing-
house Report.

-------
                                             92
                                         Table  7

                     Environmental Impact of Various Cooling Modes
Area of Impact
Fish




Plankton




Fuel Resource

Effluents to
Air and Land

Effluents to
Water (Plume)






Parameter
Flow Rate, GPM
Air Screen Effectiveness, I
Fish Capture at intake, %
Fish Transport Mortality, \
Estimated Annual Damage, Ib/year
Condenser Mortality, %
Cooling Tower Mortality, \
Plume Mortality, \
Meroplankton Mortality, Ib/year
Estimated Equivalent Fish Damage Ib/year
Heat Rate Btu/Kw-HR
Fuel Penalty for Towers, %
Fog Persistence Due to Towers, Days/year
Drift, GPM
Salt Fallout, Ib/acre/year
Chemical Release
Radionuclide Release, pCi/1
Thermal Plume:
Discharge Temperature Above Ambient, °F
Acres Affected at +1°
Acres Affected at +4°
Acres Affected at +10°
Acres Affected at +18°
Once -through
413,000
0-501
0.34
100
2300-7650
10-20
0
10-201
725-1450
1450-2900
10,440
0
0
0
0
Nil
5

20
2720
252
7
0.7
Closed-Cycle
Cooling Towers
28,000
0-SO1
0.0017
100
1-32
10-20
100
4-8
59-118
118-236
11,070
6
10
400
400
Nil
89

20
141
72
28
4
 These values  are assumed or  estimated based on scant data; values should be verified by field
 or laboratory work.

210CFR-20 Limit = 100 pCi/1
 10CRF-50 Limit = 20  pCi/1

-------
                                   93
            A cooling-pond alternative, between 650 and 1500 acres, was
investigated for the Kewaunee Plant.130  The most significant environmental
impact of the pond would be the removal of 650- 1500 acres of crop and
pasture land.  A spray canal was  also considered for the plant. No particu-
lar environmental impacts  were cited for the spray canal other than sug-
gesting that fish damage  similar to that of cooling towers  can be expected
as a result of blow down to the lake.

       6.   Bailly Station

            An evaporative natural-draft cooling tower will be used at the
Bailly Generating Station in Indiana for its 685-MWe nuclear unit.91  Two
possible adverse meteorological effects resulting from tower operation
were cited:  fog and drift.  Calculations for the southern end of Lake Michigan
indicated, "relative humidity  and  temperature combine in such a manner that
there is a high probability of  producing fog from a cooling tower only 0.11%
of the time (0.4 days per  year)."  The probability for ground fog from a
natural-draft tower was stated to be even lower.

            Three atmospheric conditions were  discussed that could con-
ceivably limit the plume  rise from a tower and thereby increase the poten-
tial for contributing to natural fog:  a strong atmospheric temperature
inversion, the presence of a high  wind, and tower downwash.  The report
considers none of these three to be credible mechanisms for contributing
to natural fog.  Two types of atmospheric temperature inversions — a
surface-based radiation inversion and a subsidence inversion--were also
considered as potential mechanisms for causing  a plume to be trapped at
low levels and thereby possibly contributing to existing natural ground
fogs. These were subjected to qualitative arguments, and it was concluded
that the tower plume would very likely penetrate the radiation inversion  or
rise to a sufficient height in a subsidence inversion (~1000 ft) insuring that
a natural-draft tower plume would not likely play a  contributing role in
existing ground fog.  In citing  reference material within the  report, the
investigators stated that, "Surveys of operating  cooling towers in the
United States and in Europe confirm that natural draft cooling towers do
not cause or intensify ground fogging conditions."91

            Drift and evaporative losses from the Bailly tower are estimated
to be about 7100 gpm or 15.6  cfs.  This quantity was stated to represent  only
about 0.04% of Lake Michigan's natural evaporative losses over the entire
lake. It was therefore assumed that the Bailly tower losses will have no
significant impact on the  lake.

            Tower  blowdown was  not expected to be a problem since most
of the impurities in the blowdown water will be the same as  those in the
lake. Some chemical treatment of this water, mainly in the  form of
sulfuric acid and chlorine (hypochlorite ions), is anticipated. The investi-
gators, however, estimated this to be of such low concentrations when dis-
charged that no adverse effect on the lake is expected.

-------
                                   94
           The possible synergistic effects resulting from the combination
of the cooling-tower plume with existing atmospheric constituents were dis-
cussed.  It was felt that since no such adverse effect has been documented
at other natural-draft cooling-tower installations and since the regional
air-pollution indices  are stable or declining, this would not be a problem.
Consideration was also given to the possible effects associated with the
tower plume  blending with the stack effluents from the  operating fossil-
fired units at the Bailly site.  The speculation is that sulfur dioxide in the
stack effluents could  be oxidized and then combined with the tower vapor to
form an acid mist. The statement was made that since other larger coal-
fired plants with natural draft towers have not reported any adverse effects,
no problem is anticipated at Bailly.  Further arguments were  developed
stating that the oxidization of sulfur dioxide in a combined plume could be
catalized by  certain fly-ash constituents.  Since the Bailly fossil units
remove 99%  of the fly ash through electrostatic  precipitators, it was
inferred that this would reduce the probability of acid mist.

           Mechanical-draft cooling towers were also considered as an
alternative to natural-draft towers.  Land-area  requirements  for the
mechanical towers were estimated to be roughly 23 acres, as  opposed to
4.5 acres for natural-draft towers.  This  excess land area for the
"economical arrangement" of mechanical-draft  towers at  the Bailly site
is not available;  therefore this alternative was rejected.  From an environ-
mental point of view, mechanical-draft towers were noted to have a greater
probability of producing ground fog than natural-draft towers.  Since the
Bailly site is located in an industrial area near  a highway, this potential
problem could be significant.  It was stated that mechanical-draft towers
are best suited for areas where fog is unlikely or in sparsely settled areas.

            Cooling ponds, spray  ponds, and cooling canals were noted as
having a potential for producing ground fog and  for evaporating more water
than cooling  towers.  They were primarily rejected as alternatives because
of limited land availability. Dry  cooling towers were also mentioned as an
alternative.  They were  rejected, however, because their use would signifi-
cantly decrease the plant efficiency unless special turbines could be made
available. The requisite turbines could not be fabricated in time to meet
the unit's operating date.  The towers were additionally rejected because
there was some  doubt whether a dry-tower system could be physically
incorporated into the Bailly site because  of its anticipated size.

            Once-through cooling was also considered  for the new Bailly
unit with either a shoreline or offshore discharge.  It was indicated that a
detailed cost-benefit analysis would probably show this option to be the
best choice.  It was rejected as a viable alternative since  it was believed
that once-through cooling  might be prohibited on Lake  Michigan in accord-
ance with the recommendations of the Third Lake Michigan Enforcement
Conference.  The utility stated that even though no existing law prohibits

-------
                                   95
once-through cooling, it could ill afford an operating-license delay of well
over one year as recently experienced by the Palisades Plant and then end
up installing duplicate facilities.

       7.   D.  C. Cook Plant

            The environmental report for the 2200-MWe Donald C. Cook
Nuclear Plant65 outlines four alternative cooling systems which could be
used to backfit the present once-through system.  It was estimated that a
cooling pond would have to be at least 5000 acres and have a minimum
depth of 8-12 ft.  This alternative was  considered totally impractical, since
land acquisitions of the required area are not readily or realistically
available in the surrounding scenic dunes area.  The sandy soil in the
general area would not be suitable to retain water without the costly instal-
lation of asphalt or some comparable  material.  The pond was estimated
to consume roughly 40,000 gpm of lake water, three-quarters of it through
evaporation and the remainder through seepage losses.  Aesthetically the
pond would be the most desirable of the alternatives considered.  From an
ecological  point of view, there would be no significant  effect other than
those anticipated from the displacement of farm and recreational  land.

            Two natural-draft evaporative towers, each 500 ft high and
520 ft in diameter,  were considered as another alternative. The towers
would consume about 30,000 gpm of water.  The meteorological effects
resulting from the discharge of this quantity of water vapor from two
localized points 500 ft above the ground were said to be unknown.  Under
certain atmospheric circumstances the plumes could cause fogging and
contribute  to icing conditions in the winter.  The  report states that this
alternative would constitute  a significant aesthetic intrusion along the
scenic shoreline and would completely destroy the low-profile Cook Plant
design. During cold weather the vapor plume would be visible several
thousand feet in the air, again an aesthetic cost.  From a land-use point of
view the two towers would require the leveling of 40 acres of presently
undisturbed dune land.

            Fourteen mechanical-draft towers, each 73 ft wide, 400 ft long,
and 60 ft high,  were considered for the Cook Plant as another alternative.
The mechanical-draft system would consume' about 30,000 gpm of lake
water when in operation. The system would also require some 90 acres of
dune land for installation. One of the  major disadvantages of a mechanical-
draft-tower system is discharging the water vapor and droplets at a
relatively low altitude above ground; this  could result  in serious icing
problems on plant-access roads and on public highways.  Since mechanical
towers have  such a low profile, they would not detract from the plant's
low profile.  However, because of their bulk, they might  have a significant
adverse effect  upon the plant's appearance from the lake.  Ecological
effects on the lake from blowdown discharges from either the mechanical-
or natural-draft towers  were thought to be insignificant.

-------
                                  96
           Dry cooling towers were discussed,  but they were not con-
sidered a viable alternative for a plant the size of Cook. The report in-
dicated that even if they were feasible they could not be used at the Cook
Plant because the steam turbines presently installed could not operate
with them.

       8.  Palisades Station

           The Environmental Statement for the 715-MWe Palisades
Nuclear Generating Station1   discusses several  closed-cycle cooling
alternatives to the plant's presently used once-through system.  (The plant
will be backfitted by November  1973 with mechanical-draft towers as part
of a settlement with interveners  at a licensing hearing.) The closed-cycle
cooling alternatives considered were mechanical- and natural-draft evapo-
rative towers,  dry towers, and cooling and spray ponds. One of the  principal
impacts of the  evaporative towers was considered to be the addition of
chemicals to the lake via blowdown and the addition of chemicals and water
to the surrounding land as a result of drift. (The blowdown issue is dis-
cussed in more detail in Section VI of this  report and will not be covered
here.) The Environmental Statement concluded that once-through cooling,
with appropriate modifications to the present facility,  would cause less of
an impact on the lake than that resulting from the Palisades  Plant operating
with cooling towers.

           The report mentioned several advantages of natural-draft
towers over mechanical-draft systems:  reduced requirement for corrosion
inhibitors, less drift, and a long-term monetary cost  advantage. The dis-
advantages of a natural-draft tower for the Palisades location were  thought
to be the aesthetic impact of a 400-ft-high structure on the naturally scenic
sand dunes and the possibility that a tall tower would disperse fog and drift
and cause icing over a wide area beyond the plant site. There was a greater
possibility for  the plume from a tall tower to affect traffic on nearby high-
ways; plumes from a mechanical-draft system would be expected to pri-
marily affect onsite areas. Dry cooling  towers were dismissed as a viable
alternative for the Palisades  Plant primarily because  the existing turbine
and condenser  system could not accept backfitting without a rather  severe
penalty in plant operating efficiency and  further  the state of the art  on dry
towers is still  in its infancy for an installation the size of the Palisades Plant.
Cooling and spray ponds were also considered as  alternatives.  The  cooling
pond would require a minimum of 1000 acres, and building the pond in the
immediate plant vicinity would require the destruction of the scenic  sand
dunes.  The possibility of building a pond about a mile inland was also con-
sidered; however, this alternative would have meant destroying 1000 or
more acres of agriculturally productive  land. These were felt  to be
unacceptable alternatives by the utility.  The spray pond was rejected
because  its reliability was thought to be  too variable under  changing
meteorological conditions.  The  loss of 30 acres of dune land required for
the pond, the great possibility of local icing during winter operation,

-------
                                   97
unknown drift problems, and the possibility of fogging under adverse
humidity conditions were significant adverse effects making the spray
pond an undesirable alternative.

           NUS Corporation evaluated the potential environmental impact
of operating the Palisades Plant with either a 490-ft-high, 485-ft-base-
dia, natural-draft tower  or two 50-ft-wide, 470-ft-long,  62-ft-high,
mechanical-draft towers.33 Requisite meteorological data for the Palisade's
site were obtained from Muskegon County Airport, located about 70 miles
north of the site.  The meteorological data were analyzed to determine
under what conditions evaporative towers could produce or intensify local
fog conditions.

           Natural fog frequencies were  correlated against the time of
day, the month of the year, atmospheric stability, wind speed, cloud cover,
and the relative humidity defect (defined as the difference  between saturated
relative humidity and the ambient relative humidity).  Fog conditions are
dependent on wind direction and more likely to occur for winds from the
east through southwest directions.  Also fog is more likely to occur  under
neutral and stable atmospheric conditions, particularly between 10:00 P.M.
and 9:00 A.M., and is most often observed with some cloud cover.  The
relative humidity defect was the single parameter of greatest importance
in fog formation.  For defect values  approaching  zero, there was a 90%
or greater probability that fog conditions  were observed.  The report
stated,  however, that fogs do exist and can form under conditions when the
relative humidity defect is different from zero, that is,'when the atmosphere
is unsaturated.  It was  determined that the probability of fog formation could
be adequately represented by a single relationship with the relative humidity
defect.

           Calculations were  performed that yielded estimates of visible
plume persistence, the possibility for induced fogging and  icing, and poten-
tial downwash events.  With regard to the persistence of a visible plume,
it was felt that the phenomenon represents only an aesthetic problem.

           The proposed mechanical-draft facility was  found to have a
lower incidence of long plume  lengths.  About 45% of the visible plumes
were  calculated to be dissipated within 350 ft of the towers. Visible plume
lengths longer than 2 miles were estimated to occur for five of the total
hours of the year.

           For the proposed natural-draft tower, visible plumes  longer
than 2 miles  were estimated to occur as frequently as 44%  of the total  hours
of the year, 65% of these hours occurring during  the winter season.  In
terms of the  aesthetic effects  of the visible plume, the areas of greatest
potential concern were the communities of Covert and South Haven.  The
estimated percentage of the time the visible plume was calculated to pass

-------
                                  98
over these towns was presented in tabular form in the NUS report.33  For
Covert, conditions favoring the downwash of tower plumes over the nearest
major highway 1-196 were investigated.  The frequency of such possible
occurrences for the natural-draft tower were estimated at 2 hr of fogging
and 0.2  hr of icing during the spring, 0.3 hr of fogging during the fall, and
2.7 hr of fogging and 2.2 hr of icing  during  the winter.  These calculations
were stated to be upper limits because observations of  actual cooling-tower
installations have not confirmed such downwash phenomena.  The report
indicated  that mechanical-tower operation under conditions  favoring  down-
wash would not affect highway 1-196 but only roads and  structures on the
plant site.

            The probability of induced fogging,  calculated for the mechanical-
draft tower, indicated an increase of natural-fog duration a  maximum of
14 hr/yr, 6.25 miles northeast of the site.  This was the maximum value  in
any direction.  There are 798 hr of fog occurring naturally in the vicinity;
the median duration of each fog episode is 2 hr. An increase of 14 hr of
duration was then compared with the average fog beginning 1 min earlier and
lasting  1 min  longer.  This was thought not to be a significant overall change.
The natural-draft tower was found not to induce ground-level fog.  The
probability of induced icing was examined.   The results showed similar
percentages to increased fog probabilities and therefore were not  considered
a significant problem.  Again the natural-draft-tower results indicated no
increase.

            Several recently published reports  in the  open literature contain
information relevant to this  survey.  These  are now considered.

        9.   Natural-draft-tower Operating  Observations

            A final  report describing a cooling-tower field study at the
1800-MWe Keystone Generating Station in western Pennsylvania was pub-
lished in January 1971.113  The purpose of the study was to describe and
evaluate the potential effects that  emissions of  water  vapor  and heat  from
325-ft-high, natural-draft, evaporative-cooling towers have on the local
environment and climate.  During the period of field observations  in
September, November,  and December 1969, when the  Plant was operating
at one-sixth of its design capacity, no adverse weather  effects  due to the
operation of the facility were shown conclusively.  Drift drizzle beneath
the towers was not  detected, nor was any increase in ground-level humidity
underneath the plume path.  Long-term pre- and posttower climatological
data from nearby meteorological stations were studied, and only in one
situation was  a possibility of precipitation enhancement noted for the two-
year period analyzed.

            General observations  had shown the visible tower plumes nor-
mally to rise  to an  altitude of about 650 ft and travel downwind another
650 ft before  evaporating.  During periods of high humidity and low

-------
                                    99
temperatures (25-30°F), the plume was observed for thousands of feet
downwind.  Casual observations indicated infrequent cloud initiation during
periods of otherwise clear skies. However, the tower plume would often
merge with low stratus clouds. In addition, the tower plume mingles with
the stack effluent from the fossil-fired generating units.  Mixing of the two
plumes was confirmed by the presence of acid droplets in the visible por-
tion of the cooling-tower plume.

            The report concluded that the full environmental effects of
natural-draft towers could not be stated conclusively from the study because
the actual field observations were intermittently made over one season only,
the plant  was not  operating at or near full power,  and field instrumentation
was lacking in several essential  areas.
                   fn
            Hosier   reported on a  single fogging incident observed during
two years of investigation at the  Keystone Plant in which a plume reached
the ground in the  vicinity of the natural-draft towers. It  was surmised that
an inversion on this occasion was just at the proper height and strength to
confine the plume and its vertical oscillations within the  inversion.  Photos
taken from an aircraft on the same day and within several minutes of the
Keystone  ground-fog incident showed that the injection of water vapor  and
condensation nuclei by steel  mills in the Pittsburgh area resulted in fog and
a dense cloud extending a hundred miles downwind.  The  steel mills were
apparently injecting their effluents at the same level as the  surrounding
terrain through many small-diameter sources.  Hosier stated that had a
power plant injected effluents at the same level, a similar result would have
been expected.

            Decker37 has reported on the relative probability of evaporative
cooling systems to produce sufficient ground fog to obstruct visibility.  The
results of his survey are given below in the order of increasing probability
of surface fogging.  This information was  obtained from observational data.
         Type of Cooling System
    Tall, natural-draft towers, standing
    fully equipped with drift eliminators.
    Tall, natural-draft towers, alone
    but without drift eliminators.
    Tall, natural-draft towers, close to
    fossil-fueled smokestacks emitting
    acid-producing stack gases.

    Mechanical-draft  towers emitting
    at low level.

    Slack water, ponds, and lakes, and
    spray ponds.
          Probability of
      Obstructing Visibility

Extremely low, virtually zero.
Low, but likely to occur with high
humidity and stagnation.

Low to substantial, depending on
prevalence of wind direction and
spacing of stack and tower(s).
Substantial, but highly variable de-
pending upon wind and orientation
or grouping of units.
Low to substantial, depending upon
the stagnation of  the atmosphere and
confinement of humidified air.

-------
                                  100
            Colbaugh et a_l. ,24 in an interim report, noted that there is a
lack of quantitative information for the reliable assessment of the effects
of cooling-tower plumes on the environment.  For this reason, a compre-
hensive field investigation of natural-draft-tower plumes was initiated at
the Tennessee Valley Authority's 2808-MWe coal-fired Paradise Power
Plant in Kentucky.  The plant has three natural-draft towers, each 436 ft
high and  321 ft in diameter at the base.  Tower circulating flow is
290,000 gpm.  The towers  are  designed to reduce the cooling  water to
72°F at yearly average atmospheric temperatures of 57.4°F dry bulb and
52.2°F wet bulb  and a cooling range of 27.5°F.

            General field observations of plume behavior were initiated in
December 1969.  A more comprehensive program began in January 1971
to collect, compile, and analyze plume configurations under various mete-
orological conditions. Preliminary results  were presented for observations
made during 130 days throughout the 1970 calendar year.  These are shown
in Table  8.  The  data show considerable monthly variation in  plume length.
Preliminary evaluation of more  recently gathered data has revealed no
significant adverse effect that can be attributed to tower operation.  On one
occasion, however, there was a measurable increase in the temperature
and moisture content downwind of the visible plume, with mist being
detected both under the visible plume and downward.

       10.  Drift Observations

            Two recent documents have reported on drift measurements
made on mechanical- and natural-draft towers using different experimental
methods for drift determination.  Reference 47 associated the commonly
used drift emission  rate of 0.2% of the tower circulating flow as  possibly
originating with early developmental tower  studies and before efficient
drift-eliminator designs were put into practice. Measurements made on
a commercial mechanical-draft  tower (fan diameter, 28 ft; circulation
flow, 12,500 gpm; range,  23°F; approach,  7°F) indicated the tower to have
a 0.005%  drift rate.  A more extensively studied mechanical-draft tower
(fan diameter,  18 ft; circulation  flow, 6050 gpm; range, 10°F; approach,  7°F)
was investigated using a laser-scattering technique and an isokinetic-
sampling technique.  The laser-scattering technique yielded a drift rate
of about  0.0055%; the isokinetic method gave about 0.0076%.   A natural-
draft hyperbolic-tower (no specifications  were given) determination  showed
drift to be around 0.005% via isokinetic sampling.   The laser-scattering
method yielded  drift percentages around 0.00012% for particles larger
than 145 u,m.  The 0.005%  drift rate was said to be best representative of
state-of-the-art natural-draft towers.

            In Ref. 75, isokinetic sampling was conducted on  the Homer  City
natural-draft cooling tower.  The tower is a counterflow design with a full
circulating flow of 208,000 gpm.  The tower is stated to be 389 ft high with
a  276-ft-dia base.  Measurements indicated the drift for the tower under
full rated conditions to be 0.0025%.

-------
                         101
(X
   CD
   J
               \O
           CN
                                                       LD

                                                    I     •






00

0>
r-t
O
CO
H















O
rH
1
•P
c
o
•H
•H
cO
fc
0)
V)
rO
O
*"C)
rH
•H
tLt
1
r^
CO
0)
£5
3








i
s
P\_j
j_
o

f2

130
-S
P_^
8
u













»*
+J
iH
D-i

CU

(X

0)
(rt

cO

OH











rH
DH 1
Ctf W)
I5


bO
.S
+J
cO
0)
^ a
 o
"s in

2 <£ cu

-------
                                  102
           A guaranteed drift level of 0.002% has been used for two natural
draft cooling towers recently sold to the Potomac Electric Power Company
for its Chalk Point Station.2

       11.  Theoretical Predictions

           Portman   has  reported on an analytical study for analyzing the
downwind extent of fog from a cooling-canal spray for  a steady wind blowing
perpendicular to the canal. His analysis was conservative in that it should
overestimate the downwind extent of fog and the frequency of occurrence for
a particular distance.  The analysis showed that the plume extent downwind
decreases with increases in air temperature, diffusion intensity, and wind-
speed variation with height, and with decreases in air water-vapor  content,
canal temperature, canal length, and efficiency of vapor transfer to air at
the canal.

           The analysis was applied to an  800-ft canal at 55 and 75°F, these
temperatures being representative of winter hot-water temperatures of a
once-through and a closed-cycle cooling system, respectively.   With the
Detroit City Airport temperature-wind-humidity statistics,  a spray canal
in the Detroit area operating at 55°F all year would produce a fog at 1 mile
distance less than 2.5% of  the time.  For a  canal at 75°F, the value  is  less
than 10%. It  was emphasized that these estimates  should be regarded as
upper limits.

        12.  Feasibility

           Dry natural-draft cooling towers each  394  ft high with a
357-ft-dia base are being operated in Razdan, Soviet Armenia.1  The power
plant  consists of three 200-MWe units, each matched with a natural-draft
dry tower.  One tower has been in service since January 1971.   Apparently,
the success of the Razdan  operation is leading to the development of hard-
ware  and dry natural-draft towers for 800-  to 1200-MWe unit capacities.

B.  Monetary Costs
       To aid in evaluating the impact of the Lake Michigan thermal-
discharge  regulations proposed at the March 24,  1971, session of the
Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, federal  representatives presented
a summary outlining EPA's  position concerning the status of existing
facilities that would or would not  have to consider alternative cooling
schemes to be in compliance with the proposed regulations.  However,
little specific data were presented to permit an evaluation of the cost of
implementating these regulations. This section summarizes available cost
information as abstracted from recent documents.

       The report entitled "Feasibility of Alternative Means of Cooling for
Thermal Power Plants Near Lake Michigan," presented at the Lake Michigan
Enforcement Conference in  September 1970, discussed  closed-cycle  cooling

-------
                                  103
systems and estimated the costs for using them.  Tables 9 and 1095 sum-
marize these costs in terms of utility-rate increases to the average resi-
dential customer.  These tables are based on the assumption of newly
constructed 1000-MWe fossil and nuclear power plants and show the effects
of low (Case I), normal (Case II), and high (Case III) values of the economic
factors involved in the analysis.  These two tables were not intended to
demonstrate the costs associated with the backfitting of existing plants, but
rather represent cost estimates  for power plants originally designed to
accommodate these alternatives.

       The cost of backfitting cooling facilities was subsequently discussed
by Mr. Tichenor at the recent Michigan,8  Wisconsin,   and Indiana  3 state
hearings.  An Edison Electric institute report, referenced in his testimony,
suggested that retrofitting an existing plant using evaporative towers would
cost $10-12/kW.  A Mr.  Woodson134 was cited as estimating the capital cost
of converting an 800-MWe plant from once-through to closed-cycle cooling
at about $3,000,000,  or $3.8/kW. Mr. Warren,  of the FPC, was cited95 in
estimating the cost of backfitting all of the 15,000 MWe of capacity existing
and under construction on Lake Michigan as $150,000,000 or $10/kW.  How-
ever, according to the testimony, none  of the above estimates included the
cost of reduced generating capacity, increased fuel costs, and increased
operating and maintenance expenditures. According to the testimony,  these
items could add an additional $10-15/kW in equivalent capital investment
to the initial capital investment.  Adding these costs to the initial capital-
cost values shows a  range of backfitting costs  of $14-27/kW.  Given a plant
load factor of 80% and a  fixed charge rate of 14%, a $14-27/kW range  is
equivalent to an increase in busbar cost of about 0.3-0.6 mill/kW-hr.

       Mr. Tichenor cited an American Electric  Power Service Corporation
estimate for backfitting the D. C. Cook Nuclear plant with natural-draft
cooling towers.  An initial capital investment of $32,000,000 or about
$15/kW was quoted.   The company estimated the summer capability loss
to be 80 MWe.  According to the  testimony, if this capacity loss was made
up with an equivalent amount of gas-turbine peaking units, the capability
loss would require a  capital investment of $8,000,000. Adding to this  an
equivalent investment of $5/kW for operation and maintenance and increased
fuel expenses, the total backfitting  capital cost was estimated to be $24/kW
($52,800,000 for the  2200-MWe plant).  With an 80% load factor and a 14%
fixed-charge rate, the increase in busbar  cost was  indicated to be approxi-
mately 0.5 mill/kW-hr.

       Cost figures  were cited for the  Palisades  Nuclear Power Plant to
backfit with mechanical-draft towers and radioactive-emissions-control
equipment:  $15,000,000  in capital equipment, with $3,000,000 annually
being required  for the fixed  charges on the capital, reduced efficiency, and
increased operation and  maintenance costs. With an assumed 80% load
factor, $3,000,000/yr  corresponds  to a busbar cost of 0.6 mill/kW-hr.

-------
                                            104
                                          Table  9
                      Increase In Busbar Cost Over Once-Through Design
                                   (Fossil Fueled Plants)
95
                                                 Cost  Increases (Mills/KW-HR)
Case
 I
 II
 III
Wet Wet Cooling Spray
Mech. Nat. Pond Canal
(Mills/KW-HR) Draft Draft
4.57 0.079 0.142 0.012 0.049
5.94 0.096 0.179 0.021 0.058
7.53 0.117 0.218 0.039 0.070
Case
I
II
III

Economic Factors
Plant Capital Fixed Charge
Cost ($/KW) Rate (1)
110 11
135 14
160 17
Table 10
Dry Dry
Mech. Nat.
Draft Draft
0.46 0.43
0.58 0.53
0.70 0.64
Fuel Cost Land Cost
(*/106 Btu) ($/Acre)
25
30
35

250
500
1000

Increase in Busbar Cost Over Once-Through Design °^

(Nuclear Plants)


Cost Increases (Mills/KW-HR)



Case
I-N
II-N
III-N
Busbar Cost Wet
Once-Through Mech.
Case (Mills/KW-HR) Draft
I-N 4.37 0.085
II-N 5.83 0.108
III-N 7.60 0.135
Economic Factors
Plant Capital Fixed Charge
Cost ($/KW) Rate (%)
135 11
160 14
185 17
Wet
Nat. Cooling
Draft Pond
0.138 0.021
0.177 0.033
0.219 0.061



Fuel Cost Land Cost
(*/106 Btu) ($/Acre)
15
19
24
250
500
1000

-------
                                  105
       Cost estimates were also presented for modifying existing discharge
designs to conform with mixing zone limitations. Tennessee Valley Authority
data on the 3450-MWe Browns Ferry plant indicated that a backfitted diffuser
system would cost an additional $2,900,000 (roughly equivalent to 0.02 mill/
kW-hr).  Modifications to the once-through system  for the 2600-MWe
Cumberland Plant were  estimated to cost $4,100,000 (about a 0.03 mill/kW-
hr busbar cost equivalent).

       Estimates for backfitting the 1047-MWe  Waukegan and the 944-MWe
State Line plants with modified discharges were given as  $9,000,000 and
$11,500,000,  respectively.20 With plant-load factors of 65% and a fixed-
charge rate of 14%, the increase in  busbar costs were calculated to be
about 0.2 and  0.3 mill/kW-hr, respectively.

       In summary, Mr. Tichenor's testimony given at the  three state
hearings concluded that:

       1.  For power plants initially designed to accommodate closed-
cycle condenser cooling systems, the increase in busbar  costs over once-
through cooling is expected to be around 0.2 mill/kW-hr for an evaporative
tower  system (nominally a  1% residential rate increase).

       2.  The increased cost for backfitting with  an evaporative tower
system is estimated to be around 0.6 mill/kW-hr (nominally a  3% resi-
dential rate increase).

       3.  Increased costs due to modifying existing discharges range
widely from 0.02 to 0.3 mill/kW-hr (nominally a 0.1-1.5% residential rate
increase).

       These busbar costs  were related to the average residential consumer
around Lake  Michigan by assuming  the consumer pays roughly 20 mill/kW-
hr for his electrical power.

       1.  Pulliam Plant
            Evan W. James, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, stated
at the Wisconsin hearings125 that decreasing the heat content of the 392-MWe
Pulliam plant discharge by 50% would cost some $3,770,000 in capital in-
vestment.  Annual costs, including carrying this investment, operating costs,
and maintenance costs, were stated to approximate $1,035,000 annually. If
the plant went to a completely closed system rather than a tempering sys-
tem, the above costs were stated to roughly double.

        2.   Kewaunee Plant
            Backfitted mechanical-draft cooling towers at the 540-MWe
Kawaunee Nuclear Plant were estimated by Mr. James to be $10,000,000 in
construction costs.125 Tower operation was stated to decrease the capacity

-------
                                  106
of the plant by 7.1% and the efficiency by 3.8%.  The cost of these towers in
terms of investment,  losses in plant performance, and operation and main-
tenance was stated to be about $3,650,000 annually. This revenue require-
ment expressed as an evaluated cost was given as $24,300,000.

           The Kewaunee Environmental Report130 listed additional cost
figures  for backfitted cooling  schemes.  For a single, natural-draft evapora-
tive tower, the added  construction costs for tower installation would be
$16,902,000.  Annual operating costs and capacity makeup were  said to cost
around $2,037,000 per year. The total additional  annual cost for backfitting
to a natural draft tower would then be  $4,577,000  per year.

           For mechanical-draft towers, backfitting costs were stated to
be $10,118,000 in construction or, equivalently, $1,510,000 per year.  Annual
operating and maintenance costs, together with makeup of capacity, were
said to be $2,105,000.  Thus the total additional annual cost resulting from
the backfitting of mechanical-draft towers is  $3,615,000.

           The costs that would result from  backfitting with a cooling lake
were estimated to be  $18,068,000 in capital costs  or, equivalently, $2,700,000
annual cost.  Operating and maintenance and capacity makeup costs were
given as $2,675,000 per year.  The total incremental annual cost resulting
from the backfitting of a cooling lake is thus given as $5,375,000 per year.

           A spray-canal system was also investigated.  The capital in-
vestment in such a system was  estimated to be $11,410,000, or when con-
verted to an annual cost, $1,710,000 per year for  amortization and interest.
Operating and maintenance  costs, together with generating capacity makeup,
were estimated to add an additional $2,208,000 per year.  The total annual
cost for a backfitted spray-canal system was given as  $3,918,000.

        3.  Point Beach Plant

           Testimony given at  the Wisconsin hearings125 by Mr. Patterson,
Sargent and Lundy Consulting Engineers, estimated the construction costs
of backfitting the 1046-MWe Point Beach Plant at $23,510,000 for a cooling
lake, $22,936,000 for  a mechanical-draft evaporative-tower system, and
$31,797,000 for natural-draft evaporative towers.  These costs reflect
interest and estimated escalation charges and, in addition, land  purchases
for the  cooling-lake alternative. With the costs for capability and efficiency-
loss makeup  and operating and maintenance expenses evaluated  on a present-
worth equivalent-investment basis, the evaluated cost of the  cooling lake
was estimated to be $49,759,800; the mechanical-draft tower system,
$45,350,000;  and the natural-draft towers, $56,493,400.

           The Environmental Statement for the  Point Beach Plant121 pro-
vided additional information on the estimated yearly costs of backfitting the

-------
                                  107
entire plant with alternative cooling systems:  $7,600,000 per year for
mechanical-draft towers, $9,500,000 per year for natural-draft towers,
$9,100,000 per year for a spray-canal system, and $9,200,000 per year for
a cooling lake.

       4.   Zion Station

            The Environmental Report for the Zion Station26 discusses the
economic costs associated with backfitting the Plant with six alternative
cooling schemes. The  costs represent additional capital investments,
capital-investment equivalents for loss of capability, and added operating
costs to  implement the particular alternative. For mechanical-draft cooling
towers, the estimated installation costs  were  $72,000,000, with loss  of
capability and operating expenses estimated to be $45,000,000, totaling
$117,000,000.

            For natural-draft towers, the installation costs were  estimated
to be $79,000,000, with capability loss and operating costs amounting to an
equivalent $45,000,000, totaling $124,000,000.

            Installation charges on dry mechanical-draft cooling towers
were estimated to be $343,000,000, with an additional $1 03,000,000 required for
capability loss and operating expenses, yielding  $446,000,000 for  the present
total worth.  The addition of specially constructed spray ponds and even
spray devices within the lake itself were considered along with a  cooling lake
as the remaining alternatives.  No cost estimates were made for  these.

            The reader should be aware of the fact that the Zion cost
estimates were based on specialized tower designs. Air traffic in the
Zion vicinity requires limitations on the  maximum tower height; 250 ft was
used as a design basis.

       5.   Waukegan and State Line Plants

            Cost estimated  for backfitting the  Waukegan and State Line
Power Plants with subsurface high-velocity discharges were presented in
a letter from O.  D. Butler,  Commonwealth Edison, to the Chairman of the
Four-State Enforcement Conference.20 The letter stated that the  initial
capital investment, including escalation,  contingency, and top allowances
for backfitting the Waukegan Station with mechanical- and  natural-draft
cooling towers, would be (as revised)  $14,174,000 and $19,448,000, re-
spectively.  With the equivalent capital investment for operating expenses
and loss in capacity included, the total cost of backfitting the Waukegan
station with towers was given as $21,390,000 and $25,755,000, respectively.

            For the  State Line Plant, the total costs for backfitting with
mechanical- and natural-draft towers were estimated to be (as  corrected)

-------
                                  108
$37,128,000 and $51,195,000, respectively. The estimated capital investment
alone for the State Line plant towers was given as $26,983,000 and
$38,657,000, respectively.

       6.    Michigan City Plant

            Mr. C. W. Kern, Northern Indiana Public Service Company, pro-
vided a capital-cost estimate of $14,227,491 for backfitting the 719-MWe
Michigan City Generating Station with an evaporative-tower system. 3  This
plant has four units; one 500-MWe unit is currently under construction.
Much of the cooling-system facilities originally designed for this unit were
still usable for the closed-cycle tower system, and this estimate reflects
the situation. No other information concerning operating expenses or
capacity makeup costs were given.

       7.    Bailly Nuclear  Plant

            In the  Environmental Statement for the 685-MWe Bailly Plant,120
two cooling schemes  were discussed: a natural-draft evaporative tower (to
be used at  the facility) and  an alternative once-through system.  The capital-
cost differential between the tower and the once-through system was given
as $7,000,000.   The operating-cost differential evaluated  on a present-worth
basis, assuming a 30-year  plant life and discount rate of  8.75%, showed the
tower to require an additional  $4,000,000; the total evaluated cost differ-
ential thus was  $11,000,000. The  Bailly plant is currently under initial
phases of construction.  Hence these cost estimates are for a new facility
with the cooling system optimized for both alternatives; i.e., these are not
backfitting-cost differentials.

       8.    D.  C. Cook Plant

            Testimony by John Tillinghast, Indiana & Michigan Electric
Company,  concerning backfitting the D.  C. Cook Plant with evaporative-
cooling towers was given at the Michigan hearings.84  The capital cost for
natural-draft towers  was stated to be $55,935,000, including interest and
escalation. (These figures update information given earlier  on the D. C.
Cook Plant.) In addition to this, $6,000,000 per year was estimated to
account for operating and power-loss replacement costs.  These costs were
translated  to the consumer by proposing that they could be divided equally
among the  358,545 utility customers. With this so done, the bills of these
customers were stated to increase on the average between 7.5 and 9%, or
by about $41 per year.

            The Environmental Report 5 for the Cook Plant added that the
cost of backfitting the plant with mechanical-draft towers  would be about
$63,000,000. An annual penalty of about $3,400,000 would be incurred as
the result  of losses in plant efficiency.  The cost of backfitting the plant
with a cooling pond was said to be about $60,000,000.  A significant loss in

-------
                                  109
plant efficiency would result with pond operation.  This loss, when translated
into  dollars, represented an additional operating cost of about $6,000,000
per year.

       9.   Palisades Plant
            Cost estimates for backfitting the 700-MWe Palisades Power
Plant with evaporative towers perhaps represents the best information
currently available, since this plant is actually effecting a change from
once-through to mechanical-draft cooling towers. In a letter from R. C.
Youngdahl, Consumers Power Company,  to L. R. Rogers, USAEC,13
Mr.  Youngdahl estimated the  capital cost of backfitting with a mechanical-
draft tower system as $20,000,000 and the increased annual operating cost
as $4,500,000.  In the Environmental Statement for the Palisades Plant,119
the 4.5-million-dollar value was used to  calculate an equivalent present-
worth value of  $47,000,000 based upon a  30-year plant life and a  8.75%
yearly discount rate.  The incremented cost of the mechanical-draft towers,
backfitted over the presently  installed once-through system, was then
estimated to be $67,000,000 on a present-worth basis.  Relative costs cited
the report for backfitting with high-velocity onshore or offshore  discharges
ranged from 1  to 5 million dollars, respectively.

       10.  General Observations
            John Z. Reynolds,  Consumers Power Company, testified at the
Michigan hearings84 concerning the cost of outfitting Consumer's  750-MWe
system,  present and proposed, with towers. He estimated that $76,000,000
would be required in capital costs  and $73,000,000 additional would  be
required to account for the 3-5% system-capacity losses.  Total annual
costs, including fixed charges, added  fuel costs, and operating and main-
tenance costs were estimated to be about $31,000,000 per year. Total
capital costs, including equivalent  costs, were projected to be about
$244,000,000.

            Mr. Wayne Wingert, Detroit Edison  Company,  testified at  the
Michigan hearings84 that it would require about $200,000,000 in capital cost
to convert  the Detroit Edison System  to closed-cycle cooling.  He stated
that this investment,  including operating costs, maintenance, etc., would
result in a total annual cost of $43,000,000 or  roughly an increase of 12%
in production cost per kilowatt hour, which would mean slightly less than
a 6% direct increase  in the customer's bill.

-------
                                   110


                        VI.  CHEMICAL INPUTS

A.  Summary of Power-plant Effluents

       Only limited information is available as to the chemical effluents
discharged  to Lake Michigan from the power plants around its shoreline.
Significant data are  available in the applications for permits to discharge,
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers.  The  operators of all power
plants have  been requested to file such applications within the  past year.
Of the 27 power plants discharging, or to discharge into Lake Michigan or
near the mouth of its streams,  18 applications  were available at the time
they were reviewed  in the Region V EPA Office.

       Examining the information in the applications revealed a number of
inconsistencies and  a substantial lack of the  information required.  Chemical
analyses of  intake and effluent water were  not available with precision ade-
quate to allow the calculation of incremental loads by direct subtraction,
except in unusual circumstances. The best information, and it is believed
the most pertinent, was given in the applications  for Plants No. 13, 14, and
16, the proposed Zion Nuclear Plant, and the operating Waukegan and
State Line Plants.  For these cases, chemical constituents actually added
or expected to be added to the coolant streams were identified and numer-
ical values  given. Accordingly, the effluents of all other plants were pro-
rated on the basis of the data for these three.  (Due to variability in the
composition of the effluent from the sluicing operation, the data in the
application for the Waukegan Plant lacked internal consistency; for this
reason, upon request, Commonwealth Edison provided average analyses
for eight monthly samples,21 and these data were used in the calculations.)
This procedure uses the tacit assumption that water-treatment practices
and procedures are  the same for all the other plants  as for those for which
the data are available. This is not entirely true, and the magnitude of the
inaccuracies cannot be evaluated at this time.  Nevertheless, the results,
summarized in Table 11, are probably approximately correct and of suffi-
cient value to justify their publication.

       Two separate categories were established, nuclear and coal-fired.
In each category, the prorating was done in terms of  the average power
level at which the plants were operated, calculated, and shown for  18 of the
plants in Table 5. The input information was the average megawatt-hours
per day output of the plants, as provided by the power companies on the
Corps of Engineers  applications. These numbers were believed to be
inaccurate in a few cases and were not available  in several other cases
In these instances, an overall average  operating megawatt level was
assigned as  follows:  Using plant capacities from Federal  Power Commis-
sion statistics,49 average plant  factors were calculated for the available
12 coal plants (52.7%) and two nuclear plants (64.0%).  The coal-plant
average was multiplied by the plant capacity to obtain the average  mega-
watt levels for the remaining coal plants, and the nuclear-plant average

-------
                                Ill
No.         Plant Name
                              Fe       K       Mg       Zn
1 Escanaba
2 Pulliam
3t Kewaunee
4t Point Beach
5 Manitowoc
6 Edgewater
7 Port Washington
8 Commerce
9 Wells
10 Valley
11 Lakeside
12 Oak Creek
13t Zion
14 Waukegan
15 Winnetka
16 State Line
17 Dean H. Mitchell
18 Bailly (Coal)
19t Bailly (Nuclear)
20 Michigan City
21t Donald C. Cook
22t Palisades
23 James de Young
24 J. H. Campbell
25 B. C. Cobb
26 Bayside
27t Big Rock
TOTAL
0
7
0
0
1
8
8
1
0
6
3
31
0
19
0
19
7
10
0
7
0
0
1
16
11
1
0
156
2
31
2
4
5
36
38
3
1
27
15
145
7
87
2
86
32
48
2
30
8
3
4
73
50
2
0
743
0
3
19
38
1
4
4
0
0
3
2
16
69
10
0
10
4
5
24
3
80
31
0
8
5
0
3
342
0.02
.30
.04
.08
.05
.35
.38
.03
.01
.26
.15
1.43
.15
.86
.02
.85
.32
.47
.05
.30
.17
.07
.04
.72
.49
.02
.01
7.64
    *Avg. power assigned f
          other nuclear 01
   *'Calculated from P04 u
          Form 67 for 1969
    tNuclear

-------
                                   112
•was multiplied by the capacities to obtain the average megawatt levels  for
the remaining nuclear plants.  These values are given in the third column
of Table 11 .

        There was an additional source of information for estimating the
total phosphorus added to the lake.  Several of the plants had filled Federal
Power Commission Form 67 for the year 1969, showing the quantity of
phosphate added to the boiler makeup •water for the year.  If essentially all
this phosphate is discharged to the lake,  then the numbers calculated from
this source of information should be about the same as  those obtained by
prorating the  experience  at Zion, Waukegan, and  State Line. The numbers
in column 8 were  derived in this fashion from those FPC  Form 67's avail-
able in the Region V EPA Office. There  is substantial deviation from the
prorated numbers in perhaps one-third of the entries; these may be  ex-
plainable in terms of variations  in local practices.

        Examination of the numbers in Table 11  shows that whenall  27 plants
are operating, about 63,000 Ib/day of total solids can be expected to  be added
to Lake Michigan.  This is some 11,400 tons/yr.  Based on  173 x 1012 cu ft
of water in Lake Michigan, this corresponds to 0.002-ppm/yr increase in
solids content.  The total nitrogen content of the discharges can be expected
to be  about 70 Ib/day, and the total phosphorus  content some 40 Ib/day.

        The numbers given for boron discharged are probably less accurate
than the others .  The discharge occurs for pressurized-water nuclear plants
•whenever there is a leak between the primary and secondary coolant cir-
cuits .  For design purposes, the Commonwealth Edison Co. estimated that a
small  leak would occur for 2 weeks per year.   These numbers were  then
prorated for the other pressurized-water nuclear plants.  For the  two
boiling-water reactor plants, zero is entered.  The quantity of the objec-
tionable chromium is small, of the  order of 0.25 Ib/day.  The  aluminum
and zinc are primarily added at coal-burning plants, where they are leached
from the fly  ash.

        In spite of the uncertainty in the numbers reported in Table  11, it is
shown that coal-fired plants discharge more chemicals into the lake per
megawatt than do nuclear plants. In the table the ratio is greater than 14.
The most important contributing factor to this is the sluicing of  ashes  and
fly ash at the coal-burning plants and the discharge of the sluicing water
to the  lake.

B.  Standards Applicable to Power Plants

        The Environmental Protection Agency draft final report on steam-
generating plants9 identifies manufacturing  processes  systems, and -waste
loads under the following categories:

-------
                                  113
   3.3 Standard Manufacturing Processes

              3.3.1.1 Chlorination
              3.3.1.2 Filtration
              3.3.1.3 Clarification
              3.3.1.4 Lime-Soda
              3.3.1.5 Ion Exchange  Processes
              3.3.1.6 Evaporation
              3.3.1.7 Reverse Osmosis
       3.3.2  Boilers
       3.3.3  Condenser
       3.3.4  Condensate Treatment
       3.3.5  Ash Handling

   3.4 Auxiliary Processes

       3.4.1  Condenser Cooling Water Heat Disposal Systems
              3.4.1.1 Once-through Condenser Cooling
              3.4.1.2 Cooling Device  on Condenser Discharge with
                     Re circulation
              3.4.1.3 Cooling Device  on Condenser Discharge
              3.4.1.4 Cooling Device  on Condenser Discharge withPartial
                     Re circulation and/or Dilution
       3.4.2  Service Water Systems
       3.4.3  Sewage Plants
       3.4.4  Cool Storage
       3.4.5  Oil Leakage
       3.4.6  Hydrovactors
       3.4.7  Other On-site Activities
       3.4.8  Accidental Potential Pollution Sources

   3.5 Typical Future  Manufacturing Processes

   3.6 Normal In-plant Pollution Control

4. Standard Raw Waste Loads

   4.1 Concept of Standard Raw Waste  Load
   4.2 Waste Load Data Sources
   4.3 Standard Raw Waste  Loads from Standard Manufacturing Processes

       4.3.1  Water Treatment
       4.3.2  Boiler
       4.3.3  Condenser
       4.3.4  Condensate Treatment
       4.3.5  Ash Handling
   4.4 Standard Raw Waste  Loads from Auxiliary Processes

       4.4.1  Heat Disposal  Systems
       4.4.2  Service Water Systems
       4.4.3  Other Waste Water Sources

-------
                                   114
Typical waste loads are tabulated, and some methods of reducing quantities
of waste are outlined.  The standards are intended to facilitate consideration
of the effects of power  plants on the  environment.

C.  Chemicals for Removal of Organic Deposits in Condensers and Process-
    Water Systems

       When natural waters are passed through circuits of the kind used in
power plants, fouling deposits that interfere with the flow of water and heat
form, on all surfaces with which the water comes in contact.  These deposits
may be in the form of hydrous oxides of metals, such as iron and chromium;
they may be  scales, such as carbonates or sulfates of calcium and magne-
sium; or they may be organic  in nature.   The organic deposits are formed
by the deposition of living organisms, followed by their continued growth.
In the presence of  sunlight, the organic deposits are typically algal, whereas
in unirradiated heat-transfer equipment, they are typically bacterial.

       For  removal of the slime formed in power-plant condensers  and
other heat exchangers  (such as those in the process-water  systems),
chlorine, added to the cooling  water, has been found to be effective and in-
expensive.  In most power plants, it is injected into the cooling water in the
form of elemental chlorine or in the form of a strong solution of sodium
hypochlorite for a few  relatively brief (10 or  15 min typically) periods per
day.  This system is called shock defouling.  A considerable fraction of the
organisms in the deposits are killed, and the  organic material and much of
the  scale are dislodged and carried out in the cooling water.  Organic ma-
terial formed on all parts of the system downstream of the condenser reacts
with residual chlorine and helps  to reduce its level at the point of discharge
to the lake.

       In addition to its toxicity to the slime bacteria, chlorine  has  the ad-
vantage that it is chemically unstable in water and is quickly degraded in
nature.   This reaction  is catalyzed by light; the data of Hancil and Smith,56
as treated by Draley,40 show that under the laboratory ultraviolet illumina-
tion, the time in seconds to reduce the concentration of free chlorine from
c0 to c is t  = 7.8 In (c0/c).  This advantage is partially lost if ammonia is
present in the cooling water, since the chloramines  formed by reaction be-
tween ammonia and chlorine have longer lifetimes in natural waters than
does the free chlorine (which exists in the form of hypochlorous  acid or the
hypochlorite ion).

        The optimum utilization of chlorine for defouling  would require that
the chlorine  and chloramines be decayed or dissipated before discharge of
the effluent stream to the lake (or other natural bodies of water in more
general  terms).  A  common chlorination practice, though by no means
universally  practiced, which helps to achieve this condition, is to have the
total  circulating-water stream divided into parts, only one of which is
chlorinated at a time.  The remixing of the chlorinated and unchlorinated

-------
                                   115
streams then leads to the removal of chlorine by the  so-called chlorine-
demand constituents  of the untreated water.  It is also possible to remove
residual chlorine chemically by adding reducing agents such as sodium
sulfite or bisulfite.  For example, in one installation a ratio of sodium bi-
sulfite to residual chlorine of 3.8:1 decreases the residual chlorine level
from 1 to below 0.1 ppm in less than 5 sec.89

       The use of chlorine and the problems pertinent to the avoidance of
significant toxic doses to the lake (or other receiving •waters) are the  sub-
jects of the recent analysis by Draley.40  The need for (a) standards,
(b) discharge monitoring, and (c) development of calculational knowledge
and skills are emphasized.

       Significant new publications related to chlorine and its toxicity con-
cern standards and the effects of dilute solutions on fishes.

       In the area of standards, the  Michigan Water Resources Commis-
sion, Water Quality Control Division, issued in the  spring of 1972 an
Interim Effluent Standard for Industrial Discharges of Chlorine (to be  re-
viewed as to adequacy and suitability on or before December 1972).85  It
specifies  that "Waste streams shall  contain not more than  0.05 mg/£ of
total  chlorine (free and combined) in the discharge  to receiving waters
after utilizing available dilution and  at a point to be determined by the
Chief Engineer of the Commission, where  application of chlorine is on a
continuous basis; or contain not more than 0.5 mg/'t of total chlorine (free
and combined) in the  discharge to receiving waters  after utilizing available
dilution and at a point to be determined by the Chief Engineer of the Com-
mission, where continuous application of chlorine will be limited to not
more than 30 minutes during any 2-hour period."

       On December 20, 1971, William A. Brungs forwarded to
Mr. Francis T. Mayo, Regional Administrator for EPA Region V,
"Water Quality Criteria Recommendations for Residual Chlorine in Re-
ceiving Waters for the Protection of Fresh Water Aquatic Life,"  by the
Staff  of the National Water Quality Laboratory, Duluth, Minnesota.45 Four
separate levels of residual chlorine, that would be applicable to
Lake Michigan or other receiving water, were identified, in terms of tox-
icity  and usage.  During continuous use at  0.01 mg/liter  or less,  trout
reproduction and some important fish food organisms would probably  not
be protected and the situation could be partially lethal to sensitive life
stages of sensitive fish species.  For continuous usage at 0.002 mg/liter
most aquatic organisms should be protected.  For intermittent use at
0.1 mg/liter,  not to exceed 30 min/day; or 0.05 mg/liter, not to exceed
2 hr/day, significant kills of aquatic organisms should not  occur  and the
aquatic  ecology should not be adversely affected.  These recommendations
require the use of the amperometric titration method; some of the other
methods commonly used in the determination of residual chlorine have
been  shown to be inaccurate.  The National Water Quality Laboratory

-------
                                   116


recommendations were reissued about June 1972.   There were no changes
in the specific  recommendations.  The text was modified,  apparently with
the objective of assisting the reader in considering possible applicability of
the criteria.

       The same document summarizes the literature that is most perti-
nent to quantitative effects of low levels  of residual chlorine on a number
of varieties of  fish species.  Twenty-four references are given.  Dr. Brungs
has prepared a more extensive literature review on the effects of residual
chlorine on aquatic life.18 Covered are the aqueous  dilute solution chemis-
try of chlorine, its effects on aquatic life, chlorinated wastewater treatment
plant effluent, chlorination for antifouling, and results of standard bioassays.
The following general statements resulted from the review:  (1)  Tests of
residual chlorine toxicity should be conducted using continuous-flow bioas-
say procedures and the most precise,  sensitive, and appropriate analytical
method for determining residual chlorine; (2) typical environmental vari-
ables do not significantly affect residual chlorine toxicity, although at lower
pH toxicity may be increased as a result of the greater proportion of free
chlorine present, but this difference is slight; (3) trout, salmon, and some
fish-food organisms are more sensitive than warm-water fish, snails, and
crayfish; (4) chronic  toxicity effects on growth and reproduction occur at
much lower concentrations than acutely lethal concentrations; (5) most of
the lethal effects  of residual chlorine occur within 12-24 hr, with lethal
effects of free  chlorine being more rapid than those of chloramines;
(6) chlorination of wastewater results  in a variety of chlorinated com-
pounds in addition to  chloramines, and this aspect needs much greater re-
search emphasis; (7) residual chlorine is more persistent than the few
minutes  or hours indicated by some authorities; (8) dechlorination with
sodium bisulfite,  sodium thiosulfate, and sulfur dioxide, among others,
greatly reduces or eliminates toxicity due to  residual chlorine, and the po-
tential chronic toxicity resulting from such additional treatment requires
further research; (9) substitutes for chlorination of wastewaters or cooling
waters  should  be  used whenever feasible, but only after adequate acute and
chronic  toxicity studies to determine the potential environmental impact of
the substitutes, and their efficacy as adequate disinfectants must be verified.

        The Staff of the Michigan Water Resources  Commission has under
way a program to assess, under field  conditions, the effects of chlorinated
condenser cooling water  on  aquatic life.  Truchan and Basch118 have re-
ported observation of a major fish kill and concomitant analyses for total
residual chlorine near the Karn-Weadock power plant complex near the
mouth of the Saginaw River.  A maximum 1.36 mg/liter of residual chlorine
was detected during the period of measurement (corresponding to  the time
of addition of chlorine in the plant).  This study shows that intermittent dis-
charges of chlorine from power plants can be acutely toxic to fish life in the
discharge channel, perhaps  partly because fish sometimes congregate in the
vicinity  of plant-water discharges.  Caged fish studies at  the same plant
were reported by Basch and Truchan11 and Wuerthele and Truchan.135

-------
                                  117


Short-term tests at chlorine levels up to 0.4 mg/liter were run.  Fathead
minnows suffered no mortality during the exposure periods.  Rainbow trout,
however, suffered 90% mortality after exposure to an average total residual
chlorine (TRC) concentration of 0.106 mg/liter for  16.18 hr out of the 62-hr
test period.  Mortality was also observed after the  second exposure for
5.52 hr out of the 29-hr test period.  Acknowledging the fact that  the fish in
the study were caged and could not avoid the discharge, the results do indi-
cate that intermittent low-level discharges of chlorine from power plants
can be toxic to certain fish species resident in the discharge area.

       Massey, also of the Bureau of Water Management, described the
avoidance of chlorine discharges and the killing of fish at the Big Rock Point
power plant in May 1972.81  The TRC level in the  discharge channel rose,
briefly out of control due to a malfunction,  to a maximum measured value
of 3.05 mg/liter. The highest readings obtained in the plant by
Consumers Power personnel using the orthotolidine color comparator
was 0.2 mg/liter TRC.  Instances of apparent incorrectly low readings
through the use  of the orthotolidine comparator have also been recorded
at other sites.

       Fish kills due to chlorine discharge in power-plant circulating
water have also occurred in other water  bodies,  including salt water.
Fairbanks, Collings  and Sides48 have reported such events in the
Cape  Cod Canal.

       The Michigan Bureau of Water Management has also done caged-
fish field research downstream of municipal wastewater-treatment plants.
In one study, sponsored by EPA, toxicity to rainbow trout has been shown
at distances up to 0.8 mile downstream.  Fathead minnows appeared
adversely affected up to 0.6 mile downstream.  Total  residual chlorine
concentrations less than 0.1  mg/liter were toxic to fathead minnows.  The
rainbow trout 96-hr  total residual chlorine PL-50 concentration below
two plants  was 0.023 mg/liter.86

       Alternatives  to chlorine defouling, receiving increasing attention,
are mechanical  methods of removing fouling deposits. Mechanical devices
can consist of balls, plugs, or brushes; they are  blown through the tubes of
heat exchangers such as steam condensers by the force of the flowing fluid
or by mechanical devices. Automatic systems are  offered by Amertap
Corporation and American M. A. N. Corporation.  The Amertap system
circulates  sponge-rubber balls in a special bypass  cooling-water stream.
The M. A.  N. System uses nonmetallic brushes, which are restrained in
the tubes by plastic baskets attached to the ends  of each tube. By revers-
ing the flow of the cooling water, the operator can automatically  "shoot"
the tubes with the brushes.   The Amertap system has received most favor-
able attention by American power companies; it is being installed in
Commonwealth Edison's Zion Nuclear plant.

-------
                                  118
       American experience with the Amertap system is limited, and it is
not yet possible to say whether it will provide a desirable substitute for
chlorine defouling in all situations.  In particular, the entrainment of small
debris sometimes leads to plugging when the debris and the ball enter a
tube at the same time and restricts flow when it is entrapped in the ball-
collecting device.  Mechanical treatment is not ordinarily used in other
places in power plants where defouling is  required. Of particular note are
the service-water systems used to remove heat from a number of auxiliary
items of equipment at a typical plant.  The installation of mechanical sys-
tems for each of these heat exchangers has been unattractive, and plants
using mechanical treatment for condenser tubes still chlorinate service-
water systems. In these cases it remains necessary to  examine the con-
centration of residual chlorine after dilution with the main circulating-water
stream.  At Zion the resulting solution is  more  dilute than the maximum
appropriate concentration in the  EPA-re commended criteria.46

D.  Chemicals  for Treatment of Water-Steam System

       Steam-boiler systems are typically treated with  chemicals to mini-
mize the formation of scale and corrosion products on steam-generator
surfaces and to minimize corrosion in the remainder of the system. Makeup
water is characteristically highly purified to minimize the amount of scale-
forming  chemicals,  such as dissolved calcium and magnesium. Reducing
agents such as hydrazine and sulphite are commonly added to maintain very
low oxygen contents  (oxygen accelerates corrosion of the steel system).
Phosphate  is added to help tie  up the small residual amounts  of calcium
and magnesium and  to serve as a corrosion inhibitor. Morpholine is added
as a volatile corrosion inhibitor  that -will distil with the  steam and protect
return piping.  Chrornate has been used in some systems because of its
effectiveness as a corrosion inhibitor.  Since the last Enforcement  Confer-
ence, no hew information considered valuable to the Lake Michigan problem
has been encountered.

E.  Chemicals  for Treatment of Cooling Towers and Ponds

       The use of cooling towers simplifies  the treatment of  waste heat,
but adds complexity in water treatment. Cooling-tower  recirculating sys-
tems, and in particular the towers themselves, have corrosion and  fouling
problems that are more difficult to treat adequately than once-through
cooling systems.  Bacterial and algal slimes sometimes  grow rapidly on
the aerated cooling-tower circuits. Some companies are now trying to
develop new and optimized chemical treatments.  Although there has been
no universally used  chemical treatment of recirculating circuits, and
hence no standard content of additives in the blowdown, a group of  chemical
additives is commonly encountered. Mixtures of chromate, zinc, and phos-
phate are commonly used for corrosion control.  Microbial problems are
controlled by addition of chlorine, hypochlorites, and nonoxidizing  organics,
such as chlorophenols,  quaternary amines, and organometallics.  Silt

-------
                                  119
deposition is controlled by use of polymers such as lignin-tannin disper-
sives, polyacrylamide, polyacrylates, polyethyleneimine, and other poly-
electrolytes.  Acid or alkali is used for pH control, and organic phosphorus
compounds such as organic phosphates, aminomethylene phosphonate, and
polyesters are often used to control corrosion and scale formation and to
provide dispersing effects.5

       The Atomic Energy Commission, in its environmental statement
for the Palisades Plant,119 has warned of the possibility that cooling towers
might prove, overall, more adverse to the environment than once-through
cooling and discharge to Lake Michigan. The following is quoted from the
Summary and Conclusions section of that document:

       "The  use of the (cooling) towers reduces impingement, entrainment
and thermal impact on fish and other aquatic biota.  However, they intro-
duce a long-term adverse impact of chemicals from continuous blowdown ...
of concentrated salts -which would accumulate in Lake Michigan over the
long-term operation of the cooling towers and cause serious degradation
of the water quality of Lake Michigan in the  vicinity  of the Plant.  The in-
creased concentration would result in phosphate enrichment of the lake
water and reconcentration of zinc and chromate  in biota.

       "Cooling towers introduce terrestrial environmental impacts on
floraandfauna ... from chemicals deposited by the drift, evaporation ... of
lake water, fogging under certain meteorological conditions, and icing in
the winter.  Although the (Palisades) towers are hidden from view, they
will cause an adverse aesthetic effect from the lake  side and will have a
noise impact on the area.

       "(For Palisades) the cooling towers -will  not only require an increase
in capital and operating costs of the order of about $67,000,000 but will re-
sult in a decrease of  about 3% in net  electrical output due to the electrical
power required for the fans in the towers."

       These statements are supported by an appended 18-page review
and evaluation of "Cooling Tower Chemicals--Potential Environmental
Degradation."  Also included is a discussion of blowdown treatment to re-
move the toxic elements chromium and zinc. Commercially available
methods for these removals could be applied to  recirculating cooling water
system blowdown.

       There are  some notable differences between  the treatment of re-
circulating cooling-tower circuits with chlorine  and  the treatment of once-
through circulating-water circuits with chlorine. Since the chlorine in the
recirculating circuit  must not only clean the condenser tubes, but also the
surfaces in the cooling tower, it is no longer possible to add chlorine  only
to the extent necessary to last for passage through the condensers.  Instead
it is necessary to  overcome the total chlorine  demand in the entire

-------
                                  120
recirculating system, both in the form of dissolved chemicals and organic
deposits on surfaces.  Chloramines, produced by the reaction of free
chlorine with nitrogen-bearing compounds, are lost to a considerable
extent by volatilization in the aeration while passing through the cooling
tower.55 It is also possible to chlorinate by adding enough free chlorine
to initiate the  "breakpoint"  reaction, in which the chloramines are oxidized
to nitrous oxide, which is in turn lost by aeration. The techniques and the
operating procedures for cooling-tower circuits have not  yet been well
established, and remain to be optimized. Additionally it will be necessary
to establish some procedure in which the residual chlorine in the recircu-
lating cooling water is not discharged to the natural body  of water through
the  blowdown during periods of chlorination. Possibly blowdown could be
suspended for periods; plants now being built have included holding ponds
in the blowdown circuit so there is time for chlorine decay before dis-
charge.  Separately pumped dilution streams are possible, and chemicals
could be added to remove the residual chlorine.  No cooling-tower recircu-
lating cooling circuits are operating on Lake Michigan. The Palisades Nu-
clear Plant, the Bailly Nuclear Plant, and the Michigan City Plant are
planning to operate in this fashion.

        No cooling ponds are proposed for use on the shores of Lake Michigan.
For other installations,  such cooling ponds have effected  certain simplifi-
cations. Short-term chemical additions are discharged,  in a more dilute
form, over a longer period of time.  Unstable chemicals  like chlorine are
typically completely decayed away before  reaching the point of blowdown,
and so are not  significantly present in the plant discharge.

-------
                                  121
                            REFERENCES

 1.  Anonymous, "Dry Cooling Tower Uses Steel Structure," Electrical
    World, April 1, 1972.
 2.  Anonymous, "Contract," Electrical World, May 1, 1972, p. 106.
 3.  Asbury, J. G., "Effects of Thermal Discharges on the Mass/Energy
    Balance of Lake Michigan," ANL/ES-1, July 1970.
 4.  Asbury, J. G., and Frigo, A. A., "A Phenomenological Relationship for
    Predicting the Surface Areas of Thermal Plumes in Lakes," ANL/ES-5,
    April 1971.

 5.  Ayers, J.  C., et al., "Benton Harbor Power Plant Limnological Studies,
    Part VII, Cook Plant Preoperational Studies, 1970," Special Report
    No. 44, Great Lakes Research Division,  The University of Michigan,
    Ann Arbor, Michigan, March 1971.

 6.  Ayers, J.  C., et al.,  "Benton Harbor Power Plant Limnological Studies,
    Part IV:  Cook Plant Preoperational Studies, 1969," Special Report
    No. 44, Great Lakes Res. Div., The University of Michigan, 1970.
 7.  Ayers, J.  C., et _aL,  "Benton Harbor Power Plant Limnological Studies,
    Part IX, The Biological Survey of 10 July 1970," Special Report No. 44,
    Great Lakes Research Div., The University of Michigan.
 8.  Ayers, J.  C., O'Hara, N. W., and Yocum, W. L., "Benton Harbor Power
    Plant Limnological Studies, Part VIII, Winter Operations 1970-1971,"
    The University of Michigan, Great Lakes Research Division, Special
    Report No. 44, June  1971.
 9.  Aynsley, E., and Jackson, M. R., "Industrial Waste Studies:  Steam
    Generating Plants."  Draft final report of Freeman Laboratories, Inc.,
    for the Water Quality Office of the Environmental Protection Agency,
    May 1971.
10.  Badger, R. G., and Roessler, M. A., "An Ecological Study  of South
    Biscayne Bay and Card Sound," Zooplankton, pp. 1-29,  Progress Re-
    port to U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and Florida Power and Light
    Company, University of Miami, 1971.

11.  Basch", R., and Truchan, J., A Caged Fish Study on the Toxicity of In-
    termittently Chlorinated Condenser Cooling Waters  at the  Consumers
    Power Company's  J. C. Weadock Power  Plant, Essexville, Michigan,
    December 6-10, 1971.

12.  Beer, L. P., "Natural and Unnatural Water Temperatures  in Zion-
    Waukegan, Illinois Area of Southwest Lake Michigan," Proc. 14th Conf.
    Great Lakes Res. 1971, International Assoc. Great Lakes Research,
    1971, pp. 507-521.

-------
                                  122
13.  Beer, L. P., and Pipes, W. O., "A Practical Approach, Environmental
    Effects  of Condenser Water Discharge in Southwest Lake Michigan,"
    Commonwealth Edison Co., Chicago, Illinois, 1968.

14.  Beeton, A. M.,  "Changes in the Environmental and Biota of the Great
    Lakes," in Eutrophication:  Causes, Consequences,  Correctives,
    National Academy of Science, 1969, pp. 150-187.
15.  Bersamin, S. V., "A Preliminary Study of the Nutritional Ecology and
    Food Habits of the Chubs (Leucichthys) and Their Relation to the Ecol-
    ogy of Lake Michigan," Papers of Michigan Academy of Science,  Arts
    and Letters XLIII:  1958, pp. 107-118.
16.  Brauer, G., Neill, W., and Magnuson, J. J., "The Effects of a Power
    Plant on the Distribution and Abundance of Zooplankton Near the
    Plant's  Thermal Outfall," The University of Wisconsin, Water  Re-
    sources Center, February 1972.
17.  Brungs, W. A., "Chronic Effects of Constant Elevated Temperatures
    on the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas  Rafinesque)," Trans.
    American Fish. Soc., Vol. 100, No. 4, October 1971, pp. 659-664.
18.  Brungs, W. A., Literature Review  of the  Effects of Residual Chlorine
    on Aquatic Life, prepared for submission for publication to Journal
    Water Pollution Control Federation,  second  draft, June 1972.

19.  Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife,  Great Lakes Fishery Labora-
    tory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, R. V. Cisco Cruise XII,  1971.
    Lake Michigan, November 16-December  4.
20.  Statement of O. D. Butler, Commonwealth Edison Company, to  the
    Four State Enforcement Conference c/o Murray Stein, Environmental
    Protection Agency, concerning additional evidence for  the record of
    the conference meeting of March 23-29,  1971, dated April 23, 1971.
21.  Chun, K. C., Commonwealth Edison, Letter to Draley,  J. E.,  Argonne
    National Laboratory, August 17, 1972.
22.  Churchill, M. A., and Wojtalik,  T.  A., "Effects of Heated Discharges:
    The TVA  Experience," Nuclear News, September 1969, pp. 80-86.
23.  Coker,  R.  E., "Reaction of Some Freshwater Copepods to High Tem-
    peratures, With a Note Concerning the Rate  of Development in Relation
    to Temperature," J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.  50: pp. 143-159, 1934.
24.  Colbaugh,  W. C., Blackwell, J. P., and Leavitt, J. M., "Interim Report
    on Investigation of Cooling Tower  Plume Behavior," Presented at the
    American Institute of Chemical Engineering 68th National Meeting,
    Cooling Tower Symposia, Houston, Texas, February 28-March 4, 1971.
25.  Colby, P. J., and Brooke, L. T., "Survival and Development of Lake
    Herring (Coregonus artedii) Eggs  at Various Incubation Temperatures,1
    Biology of Coregonid Fishes, University  of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg,
    Canada, 1970.

-------
                                  123
26.  Commonwealth Edison Company and Battelle Columbus Laboratories,
    Environmental Impact Report:  Supplemental Information to the Zion
    Environmental Report, Supplement II, December 3, 1971.
27.  Commonwealth Edison Company and Battelle Columbus Laboratories,
    Environmental Impact Report:  Supplemental Information to the Zion
    Environmental Report, Supplement IV, April 13, 1972.
28.  Commonwealth Edison Company, Zion Nuclear Power Station Environ-
    mental Report, May 17,  1971.
29.  Consumers Power Company, Environmental Report:  Operating License
    Stage for Palisades  Plant, October 9, 1970.

30.  Consumers Power Company, "Supplemental Information on Environ-
    mental Impact of Palisades Plant,"  AEC Dkt. No. 50-255, August 18, 1971.
31.  Consumers Power Company, Environmental Activities Department,
    "1970 Water Quality Studies,"  no date or publication number given.
32.  Consumers Power Company, Environmental Activities Department,
    "1971 Water Quality Studies,"  no date or publication number given.
33.  Consumers Power Company, Supplemental Information on the Environ-
    mental Impact of Palisades Plant, August 18, 1971.

34.  Copeland, R. A., and Ayers, J.  C., "Trace Element Distributions in
    Water, Sediment, Phytoplankton, Zooplankton and Benthos of
    Lake Michigan," ERG Special Report No. 1, Environmental Research
    Group, Inc., May 1972.
35.  Coutant, C. C., and  Goodyear,  C. P., "Thermal Effects (Biological):
    A Review of the Literature of  1971 on Wastewater and Water Pollution
    Control," Journal of Water Pollution Control, June 1972.
36.  Coutant, C. C., "Effects on Organisms of Entrainment in Cooling Water:
    Steps Toward Predictability,"  Nuclear Safety, Vol. 12, No. 6, 1971,
    pp. 600-607.
37.  Decker,  F.  W., "Probabilities  of Cooling System Fogging," Presented
    at the American Institute of Chemical Engineering 68th National Meet-
    ing, Cooling Tower Symposia,  Houston,  Texas, February 28-March 4,
    1971.
38.  DeMont, D. J., and Miller, R. W., "First Reported Incidence of Gas-
    Bubble Disease in the Heated Effluent of a Steam Generating Station,"
    North Carolina Wildlife  Resources Commission, Division of Inland
    Fisheries, October  1971.

39.  Detroit Edison Company, Environmental Report for Enrico Fermi
    Atomic Power Plant Unit 2, Construction Permit Stage, September 1971.
40.  Draley, J.  E., "The  Treatment of Cooling Waters with Chlorine,"
    ANL/ES-12, February 1972.

-------
                                  124
41. Edsall, T. A., Rottiers, D. V., and Brown, E. H., "Temperature Toler-
    ance of Bloater (Coregonus hoyi)," Journal Fish. Res. Bd.  Canada 27:
    pp. 2047-2052, 1970.
42. Edsall, T. A., Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Letter to
    Marshall, J., Argonne National Laboratory, October 1, 1971.
43. Elliott, R. V., and Harkness, D. G., "A Phenomenological Model for the
    Prediction of Thermal Plumes in Large Lakes,"  Presented at the
    Fifteenth Conference for  Great Lakes Research, Madison,  Wisconsin,
    April 5-7, 1972.
44. Environmental Protection Agency, Grosse He Laboratory,
    "Lake Michigan Entrainment Studies: Big Rock Power Plant,
    November-December  1971," Grosse He Laboratory Working Report
    No. 1, January 1971.
45. Environmental Protection Agency, National Water Quality  Laboratory,
    Memorandum from Assistant for Water Quality Criteria, NWQL, to
    Mr. Francis T. Mayo, Region V, EPA, December 20, 1971, "Water
    Quality Criteria Recommendations for Residual Chlorine in Receiving
    Waters for the Protection of Fresh Water Aquatic Life."
46. Environmental Protection Agency, National Water Quality  Laboratory,
    "Water Quality Criteria Recommendations for Total Residual Chlorine
    in Receiving Waters for the Protection of Fresh Water Aquatic Life,"
    not dated--issued about 1972,
47. Environmental Systems Corporation, "Development and Demonstration
    of Low-Level Drift  Instrumentation," Environmental  Protection Agency,
    Water Pollution Research Series  161 30GNK10/71.
48. Fairbanks, R. A., Collings, W. S., and Sides, W.  T.,  An Assessment of
    the Effects of Electrical  Power Generation  on Marine Resources in the
    Cape Cod Canal, Mass. Dept. Natural Resources, Div. of Marine
    Fisheries, March 13,  1971, p. 48.
49. Federal Power Commission,  Steam-Electric Plant Construction Cost
    and Annual Production Expenses; Twenty-second Annual Supplement--
    1969.

50. Fish  and Wildlife Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior,
    "Physical and  Ecological Effects  of Waste Heat on Lake Michigan,"
    September 1970.
51. Frigo, A. A.,  and Frye, D. E., "Physical Measurements of Thermal
    Discharges into Lake Michigan: 1971," ANL/ES-16  (to be  published).
52. Frigo, A. A.,  and Romberg,  G. P., "Thermal-plume Dispersion Studies.
    Field Data Acquisition,"  Reactor Development Program Progress
    Report:   November  1971, ANL-7887, pp. 9.1-9.4, December 29, 1971.

-------
                                  125
53.  Frigo, A. A., "Prediction of Surface Plume Areas Associated with
    Heated Discharges into Large Lakes  - A Phenomenoiogical Model,"
    Presented at the Fifteenth Conference of the International Association
    for Great Lakes Research, Madison,  Wisconsin, April 5-7, 1972.

54.  Garton, R., EPA, Corvallis, Biological Effects of Cooling Tower
    Blowdown, talk prepared for presentation at 71st National Mtg. Am.
    Inst. Chem.  Engrs., Dallas, February 20-23,  1972.
55.  Griffin, A. E., and Baker,  R. J., The  Break-point Process for Free
    Residual Chlorination, J.  New England Water Works Assn.,
    September 1959.

56.  Hancil, V., and Smith, J. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des.  Develop 10,
    pp. 515-523,  1971.

57.  Hasler, A. D., et^al., "Movements and Residence of Larger Great Lake
    Fishes in Thermal Plumes from Electric Power Plants," The Univer-
    sity of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Limnology (Sea Grant Progress
    Report), date unknown.

58.  Heinle, D. R., "Temperature and Zooplankton," Chesapeake  Science,
    Vol. 10,  1969, pp.  186-209.

59.  Hoglund, B.,  and Spigarelli, S., "Studies of  the Sinking Plume
    Phenomenon," Proceedings of Fifteenth Conference on Great Lakes
    Research, International Association of Great  Lakes (in press).

60.  Hosier, C. L., "Wet Cooling Tower Plume Behavior," Presented at the
    American Institute of Chemical Engineering 68th National Meeting,
    Cooling Tower Symposia, Houston, Texas, February 28-March 4, 1971.

61.  Hough, J. L., e_t aL , "Lake Michigan Hydrology near Palisades  Park,
    Michigan," 1967.

62.  Huff,  F. A.,  Beebe, R. C.,  Jones, D. M. A.,  Morgan, G. M., Jr., and
    Semonin, R. G., "Effect of Cooling Tower Effluents  in Atmospheric
    Conditions in Northeastern Illinois,"  Illinois Water  Survey, Urbana,
    Illinois,  Circular  100, January 1971.

63.  Indiana, State of, Stream Pollution Control  Board, In the  Matter of:
    Proposed Amended Rules SPC  4-R and SPC 7-R and Proposed New
    Rule SPC 12, August 23, 1971.
64.  Indiana & Michigan Electric Company, Supplement No. 2 to Environ-
    mental Report for Donald C. Cook Nuclear  Plant, April 12, 1972.

65.  Indiana & Michigan Electric Company, "Supplement  to Environmental
    Report for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant,"  November 8,  1971.

66.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Report to Commonwealth
    Edison Co. on Lake Michigan Thermal Studies Near Waukegan and Zion
    Stations, Project VII; Preliminary Report,  Feb.-Aug., 1970,"
    June 17, 1971.

-------
                                  126
67.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Report to Commonwealth
    Edison Co. on Lake Michigan Thermal Studies Near Waukegan and
    Zion Stations, Project VII; First Report, Sept. 1970-Feb.  1971,"
    June 17, 1971.

68.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Report to Commonwealth
    Edison Co. on Lake Michigan Thermal Studies Near Waukegan and
    Zion Stations, Project VII; Final Report, Mar.-June, 1971,"
    June 17, 1971.

69.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Field Study Program of
    Lake Michigan in the Vicinity of the Waukegan and Zion Generating
    Stations, April-December 1971," April 27,  1972.

70.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., " Preoperational Thermal
    Monitoring Program  of Lake Michigan near Kewaunee Nuclear Power
    Plant:  January-December 1971," April  14,  1972.

71.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Phytoplankton Study, Pre-
    liminary Report, March-July,  1970," IBT No. W8956, Project III, 1971.

72.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Intake-Discharge Experi-
    ments at Waukegan Generating Station, Project XI, April-
    December, 1971," May 8, 1972.
73.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Fish Field Study for
    Lake Michigan, Project VII, Final Report March through October, 1970,"
    June 17, 1971.

74.  Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., "Field Studies on Periphyton
    Growth near Zion and Waukegan Stations, Project V, April 1970-
    March 1971,"June 16, 1971.

75.  Jersey  Central Power & Light Company,  Environmental Report for the
    Forked River Nuclear Station Unit 1, Attachment 5, January 1972.
76.  Krueger, R. K., "A Report on the Study to Determine the  Effect of the
    Point Beach Nuclear  Power Plant on Whitefish  and Lake Herring Eggs
    and Fry in Lake Michigan," Wisconsin Department of Natural Re-
    sources Report, date unknown.

77.  Lamble, M. O., "Optimum Summer Environmental Conditions for
    Pontoporeia Affinis in Lake Michigan," Abstract of 14th Conference on
    Great Lakes Research, International Association for  Great Lakes
    Research (1971), p. 106.

78. Lantz, C. H.,  and Lisauskas, R. A., "Zion Discharge Model Study:
    Zion Station Commonwealth Edison Company of Illinois," Alden Re-
    search Laboratories, Worchester Polytechnic Institute, Holden,
    Mass.,  01520,  January 1971.

79- Lauer,  G.  J.,  Statement on Temperature Standards for Lake Michigan,
    Michigan Water Resources Commission, Lansing, Michigan,
    June 24, 1971.

-------
                                  127
80.  Neill, W. H., and Magnuson, J. J.,  "Distributional Ecology and Behav-
    ioral Thermoregulation of Fish in  Relation to Heated Effluent from a
    Steam-Electric Power Plant (Lake Monona, Wisconsin)," The Univer-
    sity of Wisconsin, Water  Resources Center, Madison, Wisconsin,
    March 1972.

81.  Massey, A., A Survey of Chlorine  Concentrations  in the  Consumers
    Power Company's Big Rock Point  Power Plant Discharge Channel,
    May 23,  1972.

82.  McCormick, J. H., Jones, B. R., and Syrett, R. F., "Temperature Re-
    quirements for Growth and Survival of Larval Ciscos (Coregonus
    artedii)," Jour. Fish.  Res.  Bd., Canada, Vol. 20,  No. 6, 1971,
    pp. 924-927.

83.  Menon, A.  S., Dutka, B. J,, and Jurkovic, A. A., "Preliminary  Bacte-
    riological Investigation of the Lake Ontario Thermal Bar,"  Proc. 14th
    Conf. on Great Lakes  Res.  1971, Internat. Assoc.  Great  Lakes Res.,
    1971, pp.  59-68.

84.  Michigan, State of, Michigan Water Resources, Proposed Revisions to
    Interstate and Intrastate Water Quality Temperature Standards for Pro-
    tection of Fish and Aquatic Life, Public Hearing, Lansing, Michigan,
    June 24, 1971.

85.  Michigan Water Resources Commission, Water Quality Control Division:
    Interim Effluent Standard for Industrial Discharges of Chlorine,  issued
    Spring 1972.
86.  Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Water Manage-
    ment,  "Chlorinated Municipal Waste  Toxicity  to Rainbow Trout and
    Fathead Minnows," EPA  Grant No. 18050GZZ (abstract only), released
    June 1972.
87.  Michigan Water Resources Commission, "Report on Water  Pollution
    Control in the  Michigan Portion  of the Lake Michigan Basin and Its
    Tributaries," 1968.
88.  Nebeker, A. V., "Effect of Water Temperature on Nyphal Feeding Rate,
    Emergence and Adult Longevity  of the Stonefly (Pteronarcys dorsata),"
    Jour. Kans. Entmol. Soc., Vol. 44, No. 1, 1971, pp. 21-26.

89.  Nelson, G. R., EPA Research Chemical Engineer at Corvallis, Oregon,
    letter to J.  E.  Draley, Argonne National Laboratory, May 23, 1972.
90.  Normandeau, D. A., "The Effects of Thermal  Release on the Ecology of
    the Merrimack River," (in a report to Public  Service Company of
    New Hampshire, pp.  199-210), Institute Res. Services, St. Auselin's
    College, New Hampshire, 1970.
91.  Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Bailly Generating Station
    Nuclear-1  Environmental Report,  March 22, 1971.

-------
                                  128
 92.  Policastro, A. J., and Tokar, J. V., "Heated-Effluent Dispersion in
     Large Lakes:  State-of-the-Art of Analytical Modeling.  Part 1.
     Critique of Model Formulations," AN L/ES- 11, January 1972.
 93.  Proceedings of the Conference on the Pollution of Lake Michigan and
     Its Tributary Basin, Third Session Reconvened, Chicago, Illinois,
     March 24-25, 1971 (3 volumes).
 94.  Proceedings of the Conference on the Pollution of Lake Michigan and
     Its Tributary Basin, Third Session Reconvened in Workshop Sessions,
     Chicago, Illinois, September 28-30-October 1-2, 1970 (5 volumes).
 95.  Proceedings of the Third Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference,
     Workshop Session, Volume  1, September 28, 1970.
 96.  Patriarchi, M.  H., "Effects of Heated Discharges from Nuclear Power
     Plants on Fish  Populations,11" Progress Report, July 1, 1969 to June 30,
     1970, State of Michigan,  Dept. of Natural Resources, Proj.  No. F-28-
     R-4, 1970.
 97.  Portman, D. J., "Spray Cooling Canal  Fog in Steady Wind," A Report
     for the Detroit  Edison Company, Engineering  Research Department,
     May 1971.

 98.  Pott, R. J., and Threinen, G. W., "Surface Water Resources of
     Kewaunee County," Wisconsin Conservation Dept., Madison,
     Wisconsin, 1966.
 99.  Pritchard, D. W.,  Testimony Given Before the Illinois Pollution Con-
     trol  Board Concerning the Application of Commonwealth Edison
     Company for Permits for Zion Units 1  and 2 at Zion Station, PCB  71-
     328,  Waukegan, Illinois,  January 24, 1972.
100.  Rodgers, G. K., "The Thermal Bar in  Lake Ontario, Spring 1965, and
     Winter, 1965-1966," Proc. 9th Conf. on Great  Lakes Research, The
     University of Michigan,  Great Lakes Research Div. Publ. 15, 1966,
     pp. 269-374.
101.  Rodgers, G. K., "Field Investigation of the Thermal Bar in
     Lake Ontario:  Precision Temperature Measurements," Proc. 14th
     Conf. Great Lakes Research 1971, International Association Great
     Lakes  Res.  1971, pp. 618-624.
102.  Romberg, G. P., and Prepejchal, W., "Observations of Fish at Point
     Beach Nuclear  Plant," in Radiological  Physics Division Annual Re-
     port: Environmental Research, January through December 1971,
     ANL-7860, Part III, pp.  118-120.
103.  Romberg, G. P., and Spigarelli, S. A.,  "Acoustic Location Techniques
     to Study the Distribution of Fish in the Vicinity of a Thermal Plume,"
     in Radiological Physics  Division Annual Report:  Environmental Re-
     search, January through December 1971, ANL-7860, Part III,
     pp. 121-130.

-------
                                  129
104.  Raney, E. C., "Heated Discharges and Fishes in Lake Michigan in the
     Vicinity of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant," presented to Michigan
     Water Resources Commission, Lansing, Michigan, June 24, 1971.
105.  Scarpace, F. L., and Green, T., "The Use of a Thermal Line Scanner
     in the Remote Sensing of Water Pollution," The University of
     Wisconsin Sea Grant Program, Technical Report No. 13, 1972.
106.  Scarpace, F. L., and Green, T., "On Rapid Changes and Periodic
     Temperature Structure in  Thermal Plumes," The University of
     Wisconsin, Institute for Environmental Studies, Remote Sensing
     Program, Report No.  17, May 1972.
107.  Schelske, C. L., and Stoermer, E. F.,  "Phosphorus, Silica,and Eutro-
     phication of Lake Michigan," Symposium Nutrients and Eutrophication,
     The Limiting Nutrient Controversy. Amer. Soc. Limnol. Oceanog.,
     Spec. Symp.  No. 1,  Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
108.  Shirazi, M.  A., and Davis,  L. R., "Workbook of Thermal Plume Pre-
     diction, Volume 1, Submerged Discharge,"  National Environmental
     Research Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis,
     Oregon, April 1972 (Preliminary).
109.  Spigarelli, S. A., and Prepejchal, W., "The Effects of a Thermal Dis-
     charge on the Inshore Biological Communities of Lake  Michigan," in
     Radiological Physics Division Annual Report:  Environmental Re-
     search, January through December 1971, ANL-7860, Part III,
     pp. 109-117.
110.  Stewart, S. R., Brown, W.  L., and Polcyn, F. C., "Multi- spectral
     Survey of Power Plant Thermal Effluents  in Lake Michigan," Willow
     Run Laboratories,  The University of Michigan, April 1972.
111.  Stoermer, E. F., "Near-Shore Phytoplankton Populations in the
     Grand Haven, Michigan Vicinity During Thermal Bar Conditions,"
     Proceedings Eleventh Conf. on Great Lakes Research,  1968,
     pp. 137-150.
112.  Stoermer, E. F., and Kopczynska, "Phytoplankton Populations in the
     Extreme Southern Basin of Lake Michigan, 1962-63," Proc. 10th Conf.
     Great Lakes Res.  1967, Intl. Assoc. Great Lakes, 1967, pp.  88-106.
113.  Stockham, J., "Cooling Tower Study,"  IIT Research Institute, Chicago,
     Illinois, Final Report No. C 6187-3, January 1971.
114.  Tokar, J. V., "Thermal Plumes in Lakes:  Compilations of Field
     Experience," ANL/ES-3, August 1971.

115.  Toledo Edison Company, Supplement to Environmental Report, Davis-
     Besse Nuclear Power Station, Volume 2, September 3,  1971.
116.  Truchan,  J. G., "Biological Survey of Lake Michigan in the Vicinity  of
     the Consumers Power Company's Campbell Plants Thermal Discharge,"
     Michigan Department of Natural Resources, January 22, 1971.

-------
                                  130
117.  Truchan, J.,  "Fish Mortality at the Consumers Power Go's. Campbell
     Plant,"  Michigan Water Resources Commission Memorandum,
     February 17, 1971.

118.  Truchan, J.,  and Basch, R., A Survey of Chlorine Concentrations in
     the Weadock  Power Plant Discharge  Channel, October 21, 1971.

119.  U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, "Final Environmental Statement
     Related to Operation of the Palisades Nuclear Generating Plant,"
     June 1972.

120.  U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Draft Environmental Statement for
     the Bailly Generating Station Nuclear-1, July 1972.

121.  U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Final Environmental Statement
     Related to Operation of Point Beach Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2,
     May 1972.

122.  U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Draft Environmental Statement for
     the Zion Nuclear Power Station Units 1  and 2, June 1972.
123.  Weiler, R. R.,  and Coker, R., "Some Chemical Effects of the Thermal
     Bar in Lake Ontario," Abst.  of  14th Conf. on Great Lakes Res. 1971,
     Internat. Assoc.  Great Lakes Res.,  1971, pp.  208-209.

124.  Westinghouse Electric Company, Environmental Systems Department,
     "Performance  and Environmental Aspects of Cooling Towers," a
     report to:  Wisconsin  Public Service Company, August 9, 1971.

125.  Wisconsin, State of, Department of Natural Resources, Hearing to
     Consider Revising Thermal Standards for Lake Michigan to Conform
     with the Recommendations of the Lake  Michigan Enforcement Confer-
     ence, Madison, Wisconsin, August 13 and 17, 1971.

126.  Wisconsin Electric Power Co. and Wisconsin-Michigan Power Co.,
     "Environmental Studies at the Point  Beach Nuclear Power Plant,"
     PBR#1, March 1970.

127.  Wisconsin Electric Power Co. and Wisconsin-Michigan Power Co.,
     "Environmental Studies at the Point  Beach Nuclear Power Plant,"
     PBR#2, April 1971.

128.  Wisconsin Electric Power Co. and Wisconsin-Michigan Power Co.,
     "Environmental Studies at the Point  Beach Nuclear Power Plant,"
     PBR#3, April 1972.

129.  Wisconsin Electric Power Company  and Wisconsin-Michigan  Power
     Company, Supplement to Applicants' Environmental Report to the
     Point Beach  Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Operating  License Stage,
     November 1971.

130.  Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Environmental Report  for the
     Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant, Operating License Stage, January 1971
     and Revised  November 1971.

-------
                                 131
131.  Wisconsin Public Service Corp., "Environmental Studies at the
     Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant," June 1970.
132.  Wisconsin Public Service Corp., "Environmental Studies at the
     Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant," July 1971.
133.  Wisconsin Public Service Corp., "Environmental Studies at the
     Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant," May 1972.

134.  Woodson, R. D., "Cooling Towers for Large Steam-Electric Gener-
     ating Units,"  pp. 351-380  in Eisenbud, M., and Gleason, G., Eds.,
     Electric Power and Thermal Discharges, Gordon and Breach Publ.,
     New York,  1970.

135.  Wuerthele, M., and Truchan, J., A Continuous Flow Bioassay on the
     Intermittent Discharges of Chlorine  at the Consumers Power Com-
     pany's J. C. Weadock Power Plant, Essexville, Michigan, December 6-
     10, 1971.

136.  Youngdahl, R. C., Consumers Power Company, correspondence with
     Rogers, L. R., U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, concerning Palisades
     system modification costs, letter dated February 8,  1972.
137.  Marcy, B. C., Jr., "Survival of Young Fish in the Discharge Canal of
     a Nuclear Power Plant," Jour. Fisheries Res. Board of Canada,
     Vol. 28, No. 7, July 1971, pp. 1057-1060.

-------
                                                              513





                              D, Bryson



     Michigan and reports from the open literature were cited if



     they were judged to be particularly relevant and as time



     permitted.



 5             The report discusses the physical and biological



 6   aspects of thermal discharges.  A section on "Ambient Lake



 7   Conditions" describes preoperational field studies, thermal



     bar measurements, and general lakewide  phenomena that are



 9   pertinent to powerplant siting considerations.  A section on



10   "Studies Related to Thermal Plumes" describes field measure-



11   ments of the physical and biological characteristics of thermal



12   discharges, summarizes mathematical modeling techniques, and



13   describes some laboratory tests on the biological effects of



14   heated water.  An "Intake and Discharge Effects" section



1$   summarizes operational data from most of the powerplants on



16   Lake Michigan, describes the intake and outfall designs of



17   the five major nuclear facilities sited on the lake, and dis-



     cusses biological effects observed at various powerplants.



19             The report also discusses alternative cooling



     systems.  A  section on "Cooling Towers, Ponds and  Spray



21   Canals"  describes  several  analyses of closed-cycle cooling



22    systems  as reported  in some  of the Environmental Impact



      Statements and  summarizes  available data on estimated  costs



      of original  installations  and backfitting.   Chemical dis-



      charges  from both  fossil-fired and nuclear powerplants are

-------
                                                              514

 1                            D. Bryson
 2   tabulated in the section on "Chemical Inputs."  This section
 3   also describes chemicals used in condensers, process water
 4   systems, cooling towers and ponds, and reports on recent
 5   experiments to study the biological effects of various con-
 6   centrations of these chemicals.
 7             The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in the
 8   process of establishing nationwide  effluent guidelines for
 9   the Refuse Act Permit Program, has reviewed large quantities
10   of data on the effects of cooling water discharges on the
11   aquatic environment.  From the beginning, it has been recog-
12   nized that the effects of cooling water discharges are
13   dependent on many factors in addition to that of temperature
14   increase.  These factors include such variables as intake
15   and outfall, location and design, quality of the cooling
16   water supply and receiving waters, biological importance of
17   the affected area, chemical discharges associated with
1^   plant operation, etc.
19             It became obvious that a single effluent require-
2®   ment for the entire Nation was neither feasible nor desir-
21   able.  For this reason, EPA has established the policy that
oo
     all discharges to the aquatic environment involving waste
2^
     heat must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into
     account that some discharges must be evaluated collectively
25
     due to their combined impact on the receiving water.

-------
                                                                515
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
 23
 24
 25
                         D.  Bryson
          In my statement are copies of EPA*s thermal policy
as stated by Mr. John Quarles,  Assistant Administrator for
Enforcement and General Counsel,  dated May 12,  1972,   Also
attached is a speech by Mr.  Quarles that relates to this
subject,
          To determine the impact of this policy on thermal
discharges to Lake Michigan,  one must conduct a thorough
assessment of each major heat source individually and
collectively due to any combined impacts that may occur*
          In summary,  I want  to state that the position of
the Environmental Protection  Agency on the question before
the conference today remains  unchanged from that as issued
by Mr. Ruckelshaus in May of  last year.  We are here today
to listen to any new testimony that is pertinent to the issue,
but I repeat again:  The position of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency remains as stated in the Enforcement
Conference recommendations.
          In brief summary, that position is:  that certain
controls on items such as mixing zones, intake velocities,
and so on, need to be placed on appropriate powerplants.
In addition, there should be a nonproliferation of new
powerplants on Lake Michigan,  in addition to general con-
trols, and limitations should be placed on large volume
heated water discharges by requiring closed-cycle cooling

-------
                                                              516





 1                            D. Bryson



 2,   systems using cooling towers or alternative cooling systems



 3   on all new powerplants.



 4             That concludes my statement,  Mr, Chairman.



 5             MR. MAYO:  Are there any questions or comments from



 6   the conferees?



 7             MR. McDONALD:  Mr, Bryson,  in your summary of the



     Argonne report,  you did not indicate  whether you felt there



 9   was substantial  new technical information either supporting



10   closed-cycle cooling systems or not supporting those systems,



11   Would you comment on the significance of this report in



12   those terms?



               MR, BRYSON:   The information contained in the



     Argonne report,  by itself, does not present any new evidence



15   that would support the requirement for closed-cycle cooling



     systems, when you consider the entire lakewide   basin.   The



     information contained in the report deals with individual


i A
xo   powerplants,with studies around those individual powerplants.



               While  it does include indications of damage,  I


or\
     would have to say that it does not show that there is an



21   overwhelming case of damage from these powerplants on an


22
     individual plant-by-plant basis,


23
               MR. MATO:  Any other questions,  gentlemen?



24             MR. PURDY:   Yes.



25             MR. MAYO:  Mr. Purdy.

-------
                                                              517
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
                         D, Bryson
          MR. PURDY:  Mr. Bryson,  with,  say,  respect to the
thermal question as it relates to  an enforcement conference
proceeding, in this session to date we have talked about
many other problems including the, say,  nutrient problem,
and the conference, in that case,  made a finding that the
nutrient problem, as it existed, was such that there was, in
fact, an injury to the health  or  welfare of  persons in a State
                                                             i
other than that in which the discharge originated and, as such,
became a matter under the enforcement conference proceedings.
          Now, with respect to the thermal question, has
this conference made a finding that the existing thermal dis-
charges are  causing an injury in Lake Michigan that affect
the health and welfare of persons in another State?
          MR, McDONALD:  I think maybe I can answer that
question, Mr, Purdy.
          You are right  in saying that anything within the
enforcement  conference that would be within the Jurisdiction
has to affect the health or welfare of citizens of  another
State if  it  is an interstate action, which this is.
           I  think the conferees,  in their  wisdom, last
time, and in their  recommendations to the  Administrator,
indicated that they felt that  there was  sufficient  concern
about the health and welfare of citizens in the  States
other than those in which the dischargers  were located, to

-------
    	.	St
 1                            D. Bryson
 2   include this as a specific conference recommendation.
 3             However, apart from that specific  conference
 4   recommendation, there are other opportunities that the
 5   Federal Government has to support the recommendation, and
 6   those  are:
 7             1.  Under the Refuse Act Permit Program, each of
 8   the  dischargers, or proposed future dischargers, is and
 9   will be required to obtain a discharge permit.  We will have
10   an opportunity at that time to assess whether there is com-
11   pliance with the conference recommendation,  as a Federal
12   matter,
13             2.  Also, we have the opportunity  with the Atomic
14   Energy Commission hearings to comment and intervene on
15   specific hearings to the extent that this Agency feels such
16   an intervention should take place.
17             So I think perhaps since the last  session of the
1$   conference, when the permit program was in its real infancy
19   — that is the Refuse Act Permit Program —  it is starting
20   to mature now — there is pending legislation that very
21   likely may see passage in the immediate future.  I think
22   there  are other opportunities above and beyond the enforce-
23   ment conference — or the Federal Government, speaking
2^   strictly as one entity — to tackle this question, if the
2 5   question of health and welfare, under the conference

-------
   	519



 1                            D* Bryson


 2   jurisdiction became a central point.


 3             MR. PURDY:  Well, really, I would like to attempt


 4   to place in perspective the action, as I feel the conferees


 5   meant it to be at the last conference, and that this con-


 6   ference has been used as a mechanism by which we, the States


 7   that border on Lake Michigan and the Federal Government,


 &   could arrive at some sort of coordinated position, from


 9   the matter of adopting water quality standards for thermal


10   discharges into Lake Michigan.  And, as I have interpreted


11   some of the information that I have read, it appears that


12   there is a feeling by some that at least some of the con-


13   ferees, including me, did not carry through with our commit-


14   ment to this enforcement conference.


1$             At the last session, as it relates to the


16   recommendations of this conference session, yes, I did


17   agree that this should be the conferees* recommendations to


1°   the Administrator, that these recommendations should be sent


•^•9   to the various States for their adoption under State law as


2(-)   water quality standards, and that the .States initiate pro-


21   cesses under their State laws to do so.  In our  case and in

29
  *•  I the other cases, the various States have done that.  I did

0"5
  J   not commit the State of Michigan to adopting those as water


  *   quality  standards at the last session of this conference.

25
     I  could  not do that.

-------
                                                                520
                              D. Bryson



 2             MR. McDONALD:  Well, I think you made that clear



 3   at the last conference and other conferences you have been



 4   in, that you are the Executive Director of the Commission



 5   and you go back to your Commission to present a recommenda-



 6   tion, and there has been, of course, a substantial difference



 7   in the recommendation that the conference adopted versus



     the proposed water quality standards that you have sent the



 9   Federal Government.



10             MR. PURDY:  Yes.



11             MR. McDONALD:  We recognize that



12             MR. MAYO:  Are there any other comments, gentlemen?



13             Thank you, Mr. Bryson.



14             Mr. Bryson will announce the following presenta-



15   tions that will be made as part of the Federal portion this



16   morning.



17             MR. BRYSON:  In preparation for the reconvened



     session of the conference, the Environmental Protection



19   Agency wanted to get a feeling for the serious dischargers



20   around the lake as to how they are in compliance with the



     conference recommendation; specifically, the conference



     recommendation dealing with the 3° limit at the 1,000 foot



 3   zone around a discharge point.



               We had our National Field Investigations Center



     perform a flyover on Lake Michigan for us using

-------
     	521
                              A. Dybdahl
     infrared film to photograph each of the dischargers around
     the lake.
               At this point, I would like to call upon Mr.
     Arthur Dybdahl from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     to present a summary of his findings on that flyover.
               Mr. Dybdahl.

 9                 STATEMENT OF ARTHUR W. DYBDAHL,
10              NATIONAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS CENTER,
11                     OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT,
12             U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
13                       DENVER, COLORADO
14
15             MR. DYBDAHL:  Mr. Chairman, conferees and ladies
16   and gentlemen.  My name is Art Dybdahl.  I am with the
17   National Field Investigations Center
               MR. MAYO:  Excuse me.
19             MR. DYBDAHL:  Yes, sir.
20             MR. MAYO:  You might adjust that microphone a
21   little bit for your height.  That is better.
22             Please proceed.
               MR. DYBDAHL:  Again, my name  is Art Dybdahl.  I
     am with the National Field Investigations Center, which is
     a part of the Office of Enforcement, U.S. Environmental

-------
   	522
 1                          A. Dybdahl
 2   Protection Agency.
 3             I was requested by the Federal conferees to make
 4   a brief statement upon my qualifications in regard to this
 5   particular effort and any future efforts,
 6             By education, I am a physicist, a graduate of the
 7   University of Nebraska.  I have spent the past 6 and a half
 &   years dealing with specific topics within the field of
 9   aerial reconnaissance.  I spent nearly 2 years out of school
10   with the General Electric Company in radar research and
11   development, and I spent 4 years with the McDonnell-Douglas
12   Corporation in the design and development of reconnaissance
13   equipment on the U.S. versions and British versions of the
14   Phantom aircraft.
15             Okay.  Now that I have told you what I do, I would
16   also like to tell you that I make errors, and call to your
17   attention my report of which Mr. Bryson  said I would present
1°   only a summary,
19             The report will be submitted to the record, as if
20   read, in its entirety, with one correction.  That correction
21   is this:  I had identified a thermal source within Muskegon
22   Lake as the B. C. Cobb powerplant.  We discovered, with the
2^   help of the S and A people within Region V of EPA that that'
2/f   is not the B. C. Cobb powerplant; instead it is the Warren
2^   Paper Company.

-------
                                                               523





 1                            A.  Dybdahl



 2             So,  I request,  at  this time,  Mr.  Chairman,  the



 3   record be held open for 7 days so that  I may make that



 4   correction and submit a formal report.



 5             MR.  MAYO:  What page on the report does the cor-



 6   rection fall on?



 7             Is that Figure 6 on page 13?



               MR.  DIBDAHL:  That is one of  them, yes, sir.



 9             It would be page 11, the title; page 13 which is



10   Figure 6; and page 14, which is Figure  7; and in the table



11   within the summary.



12             This particular mission was flown last Thursday



13   afternoon, a week ago today.  We obtained the imagery late



14   Friday afternoon and we had to have the report prepared for



15   this conference by Monday of this week.  Due to this



16   urgency, the error was attributed to that, through misiden-



17   tification of that particular company.



               At this time, I would like to present the summary



     from this report, and a brief statement on how the particular



     imagery was recorded.



21  I           (Mr. Dybdahl»s revised report follows  in its



    1 entirety.)
22 '
23



24



25

-------
      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

           OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
           REMOTE SENSING STUDY

                    OF

            THERMAL DISCHARGES

                    TO

              LAKE MICHIGAN



WISCONSIN - ILLINOIS - INDIANA - MICHIGAN
   National Field Investigations Center
             Denver, Colorado
                   and
                 Region V
             Chicago, Illinois

              September 1972

-------
     A summary of the information contained in



this report was presented at the Fourth Session



of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference on



September 21, 1972.

-------
                        TABLE  OF CONTENTS

Chapter                                                            Page

          TABLE OF CONTENTS	      i

          LIST OF FIGURES	    ill

    I      SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	      1

   II      INTRODUCTION 	      k

  III      RESULTS OF THERMAL DATA ANALYSIS  	      7

          Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  - Oak  Creek
               Power Station	      7

          Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  - Lakeside
               Power Station	      8

          Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  - Port Washington
               Power Station	      8

          Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  - Edgewater
               Power Station	      9

          Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  - Point  Beach
               Power Station	      9

          Fox River Wisconsin  (Lake Winnebago  to  Green Bay).  ...     10

          Michigan Consumers Power  Company  - B. C.  Cobb
               Power Station	     10

          Muskegon Lake, Michigan (western  area)  	     10

          Michigan Consumers Power  Company  - J. H.  Campbell
               Power Station	     12

          Michigan Consumers Power  Company  - Palisades
               Power Station	     12

          Northern Indiana Public Service - Michigan City
               Power Station	:	     13

          Northern Indiana Public Service - Bailly  Power
               Station	     13

          Northern Indiana Public Service - Mitchell
               Power Plant	     14

-------
                   TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Chapter                                                             Page

          Industrial  Discharges in the Vicinity of the
               Indiana-Illinois State Line 	    15

          Commonwealth Edison Company - State!ine
               Power Station	    15

          Commonwealth Edison Company - Waukegan
               Power Station	    16

-------
                         LIST OF FIGURES

                                                             Following
Number                                                         Page

   1       WEPC OAK CREEK POWER STATION  	      7

   2      TEMPERATURE PROFILE ABOUT PORT  WASHINGTON
               POWER PLANT	      8

   3      WEPC EDGEWATER POWER STATION  	      9

   k      WEPC POINT BEACH POWER STATION  	      9

   5      THERMAL DISCHARGE INTO FOX RIVER 	      10

   6      MUSKEGON LAKE INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE  	      10

   7      THERMAL PLUME, MUSKEGON LAKE  INTO LAKE
               MICHIGAN	      10

   8      INDUSTRIAL THERMAL DISCHARGE  	      II

   9      MCPC CAMPBELL POWER STATION.  .	      12

  10      NIPS MICHIGAN CITY POWER PLANT	      13

  11       NIPS BAILLY POWER STATION	      13

  12      INDUSTRIAL THERMAL DISCHARGE  	      13

  13      INDUSTRIAL THERMAL DISCHARGE  	      }k

  ]k      NIPS MITCHELL POWER STATION	      15

  15      INDUSTRIAL THERMAL DISCHARGE	      15

  16      INDUSTRIAL THERMAL DISCHARGE  	      15

  17      INDIANA-ILLINOIS SHORE MAP 	      15

  18      CEC STATELINE POWER STATION	      16

  19      CEC WAUKEGAN POWER STATION 	      16
                               iii

-------
                   I.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


     An aerial reconnaissance study was conducted along pre-designated

segments of the shoreline of Lake Michigan on September 14, 1972.   The

purpose of this remote sensing study was to document the extent of

thermal discharges from the major electric power plants over the area

extending from Muskegon, Michigan, to Twin Creeks, Wisconsin.   A total

of ten power stations were in operation at the time of flight  while

three others were not in operation.

     At the Third Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference,

Recommendation No. 1  was adopted by the Conferees representing Indiana,

Michigan, Wisconsin,  and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency which

stated that:

          "Applicable to all waste heat discharges except
          as noted above:'*> At any time, and at a maximum
          distance of 1,000 feet from a fixed point adjacent
          to the discharge, (agreed upon by the State and
          Federal regulatory agencies), the receiving water
          temperature shall not be more than 3°F above the
          existing natural temperature nor shall the maximum
          temperature exceed those listed below whichever  is
          lower."

The maximum "surface to three-foot depth" temperature recommended for

September is 80°F.  Recommendation No. 1 was interpreted in this report

to include all power plants discharging directly to Lake Michigan or

within three miles of the shoreline.

     Thermal data obtained at a distance of 1,000 feet from the outfall,

for each of the ten power stations which were in operation on September 14,
^Municipal waste and water treatment plants, and vessels.

-------
1972 are summarized in the following table:


                                     Surface Temperature Increase Over
                                     Lake Background at 1,000 Feet From
Power Plant                          	Discharge	

Oak Creek                               11.5°F (7-1»0F at 2,000 feet)

Port Washington                         Violation not ascertained

Edgewater                               5-5°F (4°F at 2,000 feet)

Point Beach                             5-5°F

J. H. Campbell                          12°F (6°F at 2,000 feet)

Michigan City                           7°F  (7°F at 2,000  feet)

Bailly                                  10.5°F (5eF at 2,000 feet)

Mitchell                                k°f

Stateline                               3.5°F

Waukegan                                6.58F (k°F at 2,000 feet)


Nine of the above plants were violating the  recommended 38F maximum

temperature increase at the distance of 1,000 feet.  In addition, six of

the power plants were also violating this permitted 3°F increase even at

a distance of 2,000 feet from the plant discharge.  None of the  discharges

caused the surface temperature of the receiving water, at  the 1,000-feet

point, to exceed the maximum allowable surface temperature limit for

September of 80°F.

     Furthermore, Recommendation No. 3, adopted at the Third Session  of

the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, stated that:

          "Discharge shall be such that geographic areas
          affected by thermal plumes do not  overlap or
          intersect.  Plumes shall not affect fish spawn-
          ing and nursery areas nor touch the lake bottom."

-------
In the vicinity of the Indiana-Illinois state line, eight thermal  dis-



charges were recorded, one of which was the Commonwealth Edison Stateline



Power Plant.  The discharge temperature levels from each of the other



unidentified waste sources were considerably higher than that of the



Commonwealth Edison Stateline Plant.  It was observed that the thermal



plumes from these various waste sources were overlapping in most cases,



which is in violation of Recommendation No. 3 as stated above.



     From the above data, it must be concluded that the recommendations



of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference are not being met by many



sources of thermal and industrial discharges within the Conference area.

-------
                        II.  INTRODUCTION






     An aerial remote sensing study of the thermal discharges to Lake



Michigan was conducted on l^t September 1972 between the hours of 1300-



1500 CDT.  This effort was requested by the Enforcement Division, Region



V, EPA.  The study area included waters affected by discharges from the



following electric power generating facilities/areas of interest:



     ..Wisconsin Electric Power Company - Oak Creek Power Station.



     ..WEPC - Lakeside Power Station.



     ..WEPC - Port Washington Power Station.



     ..WEPC - Edgewater Power Station.




     ..WEPC - Point Beach Power Station.



     ..Fox River, Wisconsin (Lake Winnebago to Green Bay).



     ..Michigan Consumers Power Company - B. C. Cobb Power Station.




     ..Muskegon Lake, Michigan (Western Area).



     ..Michigan Consumers Power Company - J. H. Campbell Power Station.



     ..Michigan Consumers Power Company - Palisades Power Station.



     ..Northern Indiana Public Service -  Michigan City Power Station.



     ..Northern Indiana Public Service -  Bailly Power Station.



     ..Northern Indiana Public Service -  Mitchell Power Station.



     ..Commonwealth Edison - State Power  Station.



     ..Commonwealth Edison - Waukegan Power Station.



The location of each power station Is shown on the map which appears at




the back of this report.



     The thermal  data were recorded by an infrared line scanner (IRLS) on




board a USAF RF-4C (Phantom)  aircraft.  Two such aircraft were utilized

-------
during this study.  The temperature resolution of this  scanner is  0.1°



Centigrade.



     The IRLS will record only surface temperatures in  water.   Water is



opaque to this region of the intermediate infrared band.   The  maximum



depth penetration in either fresh or salt water is 0.01 cm.  Therefore,



a submerged thermal  discharge can be detected from an aircraft with an



infrared line scanner only if all or part of the warm wastewater reaches



the surface of the receiving body of water.



     The thermal data were recorded on 5'inch film in the form of  a



thermal map.  At the time of flight, ground  truth, in the form of  surface



water temperatures,  was obtained for each power station location.   The




cooling water inlet  and discharge temperatures, and in  most  cases  back-




ground water surface temperatures of Lake Michigan, were obtained  and



provided by EPA, Region V.  If the background surface temperatures were




not obtained by ground measurements, then the background temperature was



extrapolated from the film by a process explained in Section I 11 of this



report.  These temperature values served as  an absolute reference for the



calibration, and subsequent analysis of the  airborne thermal data, expeci-



ally for the surface waters 1,000 feet distant from the respective points



of thermal discharges.  The accuracy placed  upon these  temperature values,



as given in this report, is ±1"Fahrenheit.  Once the calibration described



above has been affected, this accuracy becomes a relative number which  is



not dependent upon or a function of any particular temperature value within




the established temperature limits.  This accuracy does not  include the




respective accuracies of the terrestrial instrumentation used  by the ground



truth personnel to obtain the Lake Michigan  surface water, inlet and

-------
discharge temperatures.  These values would, to a good approximation, add



to the ±1°F given above to form a total accuracy for a given temperature



value presented.



     The wind velocity, at all locations within the flight regime was



5 to 15 knots from the north as determined by the ground truth personnel.



The respective power station discharge flow rates at the time of flight,



were also provided by ground truth personnel.

-------
              III.  RESULTS OF THERMAL DATA ANALYSIS






     All data interpretations and analyses were carried out on the



original negative from the infrared line scanner.   Results of the thermal



analyses for each respective power station discharge are presented as



fo11ows:



A.  Wisconsin Electric Power Company - Oak Creek Power Station



    1.  The inlet water temperature was 62°F as provided by ground truth.



    2.  The discharged water temperature at the exit was 76°F, also



        provided by ground truth.



    3.  The thermal plume is shown in Figure 1.



    4.  A thermal transect was optically made along a line approximately



        500 feet from and parallel to the shore within the main body of



        the plume.  The temperature vs distance from discharge along the



        transect is given in the table below:



                                                 Temperature
Distance °F
Discharge Exit
815 feet
1 ,000 feet
2,100 feet
3,225 feet
4,070 feet
5,415 feet
6,885 feet
8,515 feet
9,795 feet
76
76
73.5
69.4
67
69.5
66.6
65.5
63.0
62.5

-------
o
vO
     vO
                                    «C
                                    o

                                    Z
                                                  o
                                                  I-
                                                  crr
 O  _'
     vD
     o
     LT\
                                           CM
Ul
cc
                                           13

                                           Li-
ar
o
D-  H-
    •z.
I-  <
Z)  -I
O  O-
oa
<  CC
    UJ
uj  -3.
-I  O
—  a.
u.
o
OL
a.
   O   -
        vO
                                                 S
                                                 UJ
                                                 O-
                                                 UJ
                                                 I-
        VO

-------
    3.   In the  literature  published by  the Argonne National Laboratory,



        the power  station  discharge position  Is  located at  the point




        indicated  in  the figure.




D.  Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  -  Edgewater Power Station



    1.   No ground  truth was provided  for  this power  station.




    2.   The thermal  plume  is  shown  in Figure  3-



    3.   The plume  is  4,070 feet  long  and  its  maximum width  from  shore  is




        1,030 feet.



    4.   If the ambient background water temperature  were  60°F, then  the



        optical analysis  shows  that the temperature  at the  1,000-foot



        mark, from the discharge point  as shown  in  Figure 3,  would  have



        been 65-5°F.   The  warmest area, also  shown  in  Figure  3,  would  be



        68.5°F. The  temperature at 2,000 feet from  the outfall  within



        the plume  would be 64°F and that  from 3,800  feet  would be  61°F.




E.  Wisconsin Electric Power  Company  -  Point  Beach  Power  Station



    1.   The inlet  for this power station  is 2,000 feet from shore  in




        Lake Michigan and  is  submerged.  The  inlet water  temperature was



        52°F at the time  of flight.



    2.   The thermal  plume  Is  shown  In Figure  4.



    3.   Only the southernmost discharge location was being  used  at  the



        time of f1ight.




    k.   The temperature of the  heated water at the  discharge was 68°F  as



        provided by ground truth.




    5.   The background surface  water  temperature, in  this  area of Lake



        Michigan,  was approximately 6l°F. This  value was achieved by

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter                                                            Page
           TABLE OF CONTENTS	      i
           LIST OF FIGURES	    iii
    I      SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 	      1
   II      INTRODUCTION  	      3
  III      RESULTS OF THERMAL DATA ANALYSIS  	      7
           17 OCTOBER 1972 FLIGHT	      7
           1.  Northern Indiana Public Service -
                    Michigan City Power Plant  	      7
           2.  Northern Indiana Public Service -
                    Bailly Power Plant 	      7
           3.  Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	      7
           4.  Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	      8
           5.  Northern Indiana Public Service -
                    Mitchell  Power Plant 	      8
           6.  Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	      8
           7.  Commonwealth Edison Company -
                    State  Line Power  Plant	      9
           8.  Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	      9
           9.  Commonwealth Edison Company -
                    Waukegan  Power Plant 	      9
           19 OCTOBER 1972  FLIGHT	      9
           1.   Michigan Consumers  Power Company -
                    Palisades  Power Plant   	     10
           2.   Northern Indiana Public Service -
                    Michigan  City  Power Plant  	     11
           3.   Northern Indiana Public Service -
                    Bailly  Power Plant 	     11

-------
5.
6.
7.
8.
q
10.
11.
Northern Indiana Public Service -
Mitchell Power Plant 	
Thermal Discharges -
Union Carbide and American Oil Companies . .
Thermal Discharges - Inland Steel and
Youngstown Sheet and lube Companies ....
Commonwealth Edison -
State Line Power Plant 	
Industrial Thermal Discharges 	
Industrial Thermal Discharges 	
Commonwealth Edison -
1?
12
13
n
n
14

Waukegan Power Plant 	    14

-------
                 PULLIAM WPSC
                 392.5  MWe
                 GREENBAY, WIS
POINT  BEACH  NUC  NO.
1030 MWe,  PWR'S
TWO CREEKS, WIS
& 2 WEPC
              EDGEWATER WPLC
              460 MWe
              SHEBOYGAN, WIS

        PORT WASHINGTON WEPC
        400 MWe
        PORT WASHINGTON, WIS

              LAKESIDE WEPC
              344.7 MWe
              ST. FRANCIS, WIS
               OAK CREEK WEPC
               1670.0  MWe
               OAK CREEK, WIS
                            LAKE

                         MICHIGAN
                                                                        50
                                                                        d
                                                        SCALE IN  MILES
6.  C. COBB CPC
531 MWe
MUSKEGON, MICH

1.  H. CAMPBELL CPC
647 MWe
PIGEON  LAKE, MICH
                                                  PALISADES  NUC  NO. 1 CPC
                                                  840 MWe, PWR
WAUKEGAN CEC' \
1107.8 MWe | j
WAUKEGAN, ILL \j
\
ST4TF IINF RFC. Lj^
964 MWe j^^~"
HAMMOND, IND -"-/
^f MICH
.^^L II 1 P U 1 P ft U PITV UIDPP IND
_^^*~^ — MIliHIuAN UIIT NlroL
\615.6 MWe
MICHIGAN CITY, IND
                     DEAN  H. MITCHELL NIPSC
                     414.3 MWe
                     GARY, IND
                                  'BAILLY NIPSC
                                   615.6 MWe
                                   DUNE ACRES, IND
         LOCATION  MAP  LAKE MICHIGAN  ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION STATIONS

-------
   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

        OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
        REMOTE SENSING STUDY

                 OF

         THERMAL DISCHARGES

                 TO

            LAKE MICHIGAN


    ILLINOIS - INDIANA - MICHIGAN
National Field Investigations Center
          Denver, Colorado
                 and
              Region V
          Chicago, Illinois

            October 1972

-------
                       LIST OF FIGURES
                                                        Following
Number                                                     Page

  1       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Michigan City Power Plant  	        7

  2       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Bailly Power Plant 	        7

  3       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Mitchell Power Plant 	        8

  4       Commonwealth Edison Company -
              State Line Power Plant	        8

  5       Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	        8

  6       Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	        9

  7       Commonwealth Edison Company -
              Waukegan Power Plant 	        9

  8       Michigan Consumers  Power Company -
              Palisades Power Plant  	       10

  9       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Michigan City Power Plant  	       11

 10       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Bailly Power Plant 	       11

 11       Northern Indiana Public Service -
              Mitchell Power Plant 	       12

 12       Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	       13

 13       Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	       13

 14       Industrial  Thermal  Discharges 	       13

 15       Commonwealth Edison -
              Waukegan Power Plant 	       14

 16       Thermal  Map Trace	       14
                             iii

-------
                   I.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
     An aerial reconnaissance study was conducted along the shoreline
of Lake Michigan from South Haven, Michigan in a clockwise manner
through Waukegan, Illinois.  The flights were carried out during the
afternoon hours on 17 October 1972 and 19 October 1972.
     A total of six power plants were in operation during the course
of this study.  Thermal data, obtained at a distance of 1,000 feet
from the respective discharge position along shore, for the MCPC -
Palisades Power Plant and the CEC Waukegan Power Plant are presented
as follows:
     Power Plant             Surface Temperature Increase over
                             Lake Michigan Background at 1,000
                             feet from Discharge on 19 October
                             1972.
     Palisades               14.3°F (12.2°F at 2,000 feet)
     Waukegan                16.1°F (3.4°F at 2,000 feet)
     The 1,000 feet value stems from the Recommendation No. 1 adopted
by the Third Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference.
This recommendation reads:
     "Applicable to all waste heat discharges except as
     noted above:(*) At any time, and at a maximum distance
     of 1,000 feet from a fixed point adjacent to the
     discharge, (agreed upon by the State and Federal
     regulatory agencies), the receiving water temperature
     shall not be more than 3°F above the existing natural
     temperature nor shall the maximum temperature exceed those
     listed below whichever is lower."
The maximum "surface to three-foot depth" temperature recommended for
October is 65°F.  The Palisades Power Plant was also in violation
of this 65°F temperature value at the 1,000 feet point.
*Municipal waste and water treatment plants, and vessels.

-------
     Violations could not be ascertained for the remaining four
power plants due to the lack of adequate surface water temperature
data.  On 19 October 1972, the CEC State Line Power Plant was not
covered due to low level clouds in the immediate area.
     Numerous violations of Recommendation No. 3 were recorded
(during both flights) in Gary/Calumet, Indiana, Calumet Harbor,
Illinois and Waukegan, Illinois areas.  This recommendation reads as
     "Discharge shall be such that geographic areas affected
     by thermal plumes do not overlap or intersect.  Plumes shall
     not affect fish spawning and nursery areas nor touch the
     lake bottom."
     From the data given in this report, it must be concluded that
Recommendations No. 1 and No. 3 of the Lake Michigan Enforcement
Conference are not being fulfilled by many sources of thermal and
industrial discharges within the Conference area.

-------
                         II.  INTRODUCTION
     An aerial remote sensing study of the thermal  discharges to Lake
Michigan was conducted on the following dates:
     1)  17 October 1972, 1400-1530 hours CDT
     2)  19 October 1972, 1500-1630 hours CDT
     This effort was requested by the Enforcement Division, Region V,
EPA.  The study area included waters affected by discharges from
electric power plants and industrial sites from South Haven, Michigan
to Waukegan, Illinois.  The power plants covered were
     ..Michigan Consumers Power Company - Palisades Power Plant
     ..Northern Indiana Public Service - Michigan City Power Plant
     ..Northern Indiana Public Service - Mitchell Power Plant
     ..Commonwealth Edison - State Line Power Plant
     ..Commonwealth Edison - Waukegan Power Plant
The location of each power station is shown on  the  map which appears
at the back of this report.  Each industrial discharge will be
identified herein by company to the extent possible and geographical
location.
     The thermal data were recorded by an infrared  line scanner (IRLS)
on board a USAF RF-4C (Phantom) aircraft.  Two  such aircraft were
utilized during this study.  The temperature resolution of this scanner
is 0.1° Centigrade.
     The IRLS will record only surface temperatures in water.  Water
is opaque to this region of the intermediate infrared band.  The

-------
maximum depth penetration in either fresh or salt water is 0.01 cm.
Therefore, a submerged thermal discharge can be detected from an
aircraft with an infrared line scanner only if all or part of the
warm wastewater reaches the surface of the receiving body of water.
      The thermal data were recorded on 5-inch film in the form of a
thermal map.  At the time of flight, ground truth, in the form of
surface water temperatures, was obtained for each power station
location.  The cooling water discharge temperatures and, in some
cases, background water surface temperatures of Lake Michigan,
were provided by EPA, Region V.  These temperature values served as
an absolute reference for the calibration, and subsequent analysis
of the airborne thermal data, especially for the surface waters 1,000
feet distant from the respective points of thermal discharges.  The
accuracy placed upon these temperatures values as given in this
report, is +l°Fahrenheit.  Once the calibration described above
has been effected, this accuracy becomes a relative number which
is not dependent upon or a function of any particular temperature
value within the established temperature limits.  This accuracy
does not include the respective accuracies of the terrestrial
instrumentation used by the ground truth personnel to obtain the
Lake Michigan surface water and discharge temperatures.  These
values would, to a good approximation, add to the +_ 1°F given above
to form a total  accuracy for a given temperature  value presented.

-------
    The approximate scale of the thermal  maps is as follows:
    1)  17 October 1972 flight - 1:32,435
    2)  19 October 1972 flight - 1:29,600
These values were obtained from the original  negatives.
    The first EPA flight, carried out in  Lake Michigan,  occurred on
14 September 1972.  The results of that study were presented  at the
Fourth Session of the Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference held in
late September 1972.  The purpose of the  September Study was  to docu-
ment the extent of the thermal discharges from electric  power plants
into Lake Michigan from Muskegon, Michigan along shore in a clockwise
direction to Twin Creeks, Wisconsin.  The study revealed violations of
Recommendations No. 1 and No. 3 adopted by the Third Session  of the
aforementioned Conference.  These recommendations read as follows:
Recommendation No. 1
    "Applicable to all waste heat discharges except as noted  above:(*)
    At any time, and at a maximum distance of 1,000 feet from a fixed
    point adjacent to the discharge, (agreed upon by the State and
    Federal regulatory agencies), the receiving water temperature
    shall not be more than 3°F above the  existing natural temperature
    nor shall the maximum temperature exceed those listed below which-
    ever is lower."
The maximum "surface to three-foot depth" temperature recommended for
September is 80°F.
Recommendation No. 3
    "Discharge shall be such that geographic areas affected by
    thermal plumes do not overlap or intersect.  Plumes shall
    not affect fish spawning and nursery areas nor touch the
    lake bottom."
*Municipal waste and water treatment plants, and vessels.

-------
    The purpose of the October study, which is the contents of this
report, was to further document the violations of the above-mentioned
recommendations by thermal discharges in the area from South Haven,
Michigan (Palisades Power Plant) along shore clockwise to Waukegan,
Illinois (Waukegan Power Plant).  For the month of October, the
maximum "surface to three-feet-depth" temperature, of Recommendation
No. 1, is 65°F.
    It is worthy to note that the accuracy of the instrumentation used
to measure the surface water temperatures 1n Lake Michigan, by ground
personnel, has been given as 0.1"Centigrade.

-------
             III.  RESULTS OF THERMAL DATA ANALYSIS
     All data interpretations and analyses were carried out on the
original negative from the infrared line scanner.  Results of the
thermal analyses for  each respective thermal discharge are presented
as follows:
A.  17 OCTOBER 1972 FLIGHT
     No ground truth was obtained for this flight.  The U. S. Weather
Service at Chicago O'Hare Field stated that the wind velocity at the
time of flight was from the northwest at 8 to 10 mph.  Each of the
industrial or power plant discharges are discussed qualitatively
only, due to the lack of surface water temperatures.
1.  Northern Indiana Public Service - Michigan City Power Plant
    a) The plant's discharge and the resultant thermal plume are
       shown in the center of Figure 1.  The plume measured 2,850
       feet in length along shoreline to the west and 1,230
       feet in width with   respect to the shoreline.  It was
       dispersing in a westerly direction.
2.  Northern Indiana Public Service - Ballly Power Plant
    a) The plant's thermal discharge and resultant plume are shown
       in Figure 2.  The length and width of the plume were 4,050 feet
       and 1,000 feet respectively.  The plume was dispersing along
       the breakwater to the west of the discharge.
3.  Industrial Thermal Discharges
    a) In the eastern-most rectangular slip, as indicated in the
       center of Figure 2, a large thermal discharge was recorded.

-------
 1
 2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
                                                               524
                          A. Dybdahl
           MR. DYBDAHL:  An aerial reconnaissance study was
  conducted along certain segments of the shoreline of Lake
  Michigan on September 14, 1972.  The purpose of this remote
  sensing study was to document the extent of thermal dis-
  charges from electric powerplants from Muskegon, Michigan to
  Twin Creeksi Wisconsin.  A total of 10 powerplants were in
  operation at the time of the flight; 3 other powerplants
  were not in operation; and the B. C. Cobb plant, which I
  just mentioned, was not recorded.  It is located in the
  further reaches back in Lake Muskegon, and that is where our
  aircraft turned around to make another run, so we missed
  that particular target.
           The particular aircraft used for this mission was
  an RF-4C which is owned and operated by the U.S. Air Force.
  The RF-^C is commonly known as the Phantom.
           The particular device used to record this imagery
  or this thermal information was an infrared line scanner.
  It was not photographically recorded.  This particular
  infrared system has a resolution capability of plus or minus
j  0.1° C. which is to say if we look at two targets whose
  respective temperatures are 0.1° apart, we will be able to
  distinguish them on film.
           The particular recording media of this system is
  5-inch film — is of film 5 inches wide, which I will show

-------
                                                               525
 1                            A. Dybdahl
 2   you in a few minutes — and it represents the permanent
 3   record from that particular flight.
 4             The particular accuracies of the temperature
 5   values given within this report have been calculated as
 6   plus or minus 1° F.
 7             At the time of flight, at all reporting stations,
     the wind velocities were from the north at 5 to 10 knots
 9   in velocity — this was not included in the report but will
10   be in the formal report.
11             As Mr. Bryson said, at the Third Session of the
12   Lake Michigan Enforcement Conference, a recommendation was
13   adopted by the conferees representing Indiana, Michigan,
14   Wisconsin, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
15   stating that:
16             "Applicable to all waste heat discharges except
17   as noted above:  At any time, and at a maximum distance of
     1,000 feet from a fixed point adjacent to the discharge,
     (agreed upon by the State and Federal regulatory agencies),
20   the receiving water temperature  shall not be more than 3° F.
21   above the existing natural temperature nor shall the maximum
22   temperature  exceed those listed  below, whicheyer is lower."
               The maximum "surface to 3-foot depth" temperature
     recommended  for  September was #0°  F.  Recommendation No. 1
2 5   was  interpreted, within this report, to include all power-

-------
   	        526
 1                            A. Dybdahl
 2   plants discharging directly to Lake Michigan or within 3
 3   miles of the shoreline.
 4             Thermal data at 1,000 feet from the outfall for
 5   each of the 10 powerplants in operation on September 14,
 6   1972, are summarized as follows:
 7             The Oak Creek plant:  The difference in temperature
 8   at 1,000 feet from the discharge was 11.5° F., again, plus
 9   or minus 1° F.
10             The Port Washington plant:  A violation could not
11   be ascertained because the surface discharge was not present
12   at the time of flight.
13             The Edgewater Plant:  The difference was 5.5° F.
14             The Point Beach plant:  Also 5.5° F.
15             And in Muskegon Lake, as was previously mentioned,
16   there were 2 thermal plumes, who have been attributed to
17   the Warren Paper Company; one plume exceeded the 3° limit
1^   in the respective values of 7.5° F. and 14° F.
!9             The J. H. Campbell plant:  12°  F.
20             The Michigan City plant:  7° F.
21             The Bailly plant:  10.5° F.
22             The Mitchell Plant:   4° F.
               The Stateline powerplant, which is located near
     the Illinois-Indiana State line:  3.5° F.
2 5             The Waukegan plant:   6.5° F.

-------
   	127.




 •j_                            A. Dybdahl



 2             Ten of the plants were violating the recommended



 •a   3° F. maximum temperature increase at a distance of 1,000



 .    feet.  In addition, as shown in the table, six of the power-



 5   plants were violating the 3° increase at 2,000 feet from the



 5   discharge.  None of the above discharges were exceeding the



 7   allowable temperature for September of #0° F.



 3             Within the same session of the Lake Michigan



 9   Enforcement Conference, Recommendation 3 adopted stated that:



10             "Discharge shall be such that geographic areas



11   affected by thermal plumes do not overlap or intersect.



12   Plumes shall not affect fish spawning and nursery areas nor



13   touch the lake bottom."



14             In the vicinity of the Indiana-Illinois State



15   line, eight thermal discharges were recorded, one of which



16   was  the Commonwealth Edison Stateline powerplant.   The dis-



17   charge levels from each of the other waste sources were con-



18   siderably greater than that of the Commonwealth Edison State-



19   line plant.  Furthermore, the thermal plumes from ithese



20   waste sources were overlapping in most  cases.  This is a



21   violation of the first part of Recommendation 3 stated



22   above.



23             And, at this time, I would like to go to the



24   overhead projector and show you this particular piece of



25   imagery.  Can we kill the  lights  for a  moment, please?  I

-------
   	523





 1                            A. Dybdahl



 2   hope everyone can see that.



 3             MR. MAYO:  Just a moment.  Is there a way that you



 4   can address the material from the podium, Mr. Dybdahl?



 5             MR. DYBDAHL:  Will this be acceptable, Mr.



 6   Chairman?



 7             MR. MAYO:  Yes.



 8             MR. DYBDAHL:  All right.  As I had mentioned, the



 9   Stateline  powerplant's  particular location is  at  this



10   point.  This is their thermal plume in this respective area



11   drifting downshore.



12             Okay.   One industrial thermal  discharge —  the



13   settling of which  is located  — is at  this point.




     First, let me explain that —



15             MR. MAYO:  Excuse me, Mr. Dybdahl.  For the  pur-




•*•"   poses of clarity for the audience, could  you give just  a



17
     general briefing of the  geography of the  area,  where you are


18
     in Lake Michigan?



19             MR. DYBDAHL:  Okay.   I am at the position on the



20   shoreline that is adjacent to the Indiana-Illinois State



21   line, or, if you will, on the southwest corner of the lake.


22 !
               In this particular imagery, the black signifies


23
     higher temperatures; the white areas, lower temperatures.


2L
     This is a particular photographic type of film, and it is a


25
     black and white negative, so heat discharges show up much

-------
                                                              529




 1                            A. Dybdahl



 2   darker than the ambient temperatures of the background area



 3   of Lake Michigan which you see at the top of the picture.



 4             Now, again, at the far left is the Stateline



 5   powerplant discharge, /and its respective thermal plume



 6   drifting to your right.  In this particular respective area,



 7   at the right of the photograph, there are two thermal dis-



     charges.  As one can see, they are a much darker gray in



 9   these two locations than the powerplant itself.   These two



10   particular thermal discharges are intersecting,  overlapping,



11   which one may consider, and their respective thermal plumes



12   are drifting in a direction to our left and at a certain



13   point right here (indicating), the two are meeting each



14   other,



15             Incidentally, on these powerplants yesterday we



     made — or on the industrial sources, we made an attempt to



     identify the respective companies belonging to these dis—



1°   charges.



               The discharger at this particular point has been



     identified to me as that of the American Oil Company refinery



               This one, we are unable to state whom that belongs


OO
     to,  (Indicating)


23
               If I may, please, I would like to go to the other


24
     reaches of this particular area and then return to that,


25
               In this particular area, there is a thermal

-------
 1                            A. Dybdahl



 2    discharge at this location, at this particular location,



 3    at this location, at this location, this location, and in



 4    the apex of the slip at this location (indicating),



 5             It has been identified to me that these outfalls



 6    along this respective shoreline belong to the Inland Steel



 7    Company, and the outfalls on this respective side of the



 8    channel belong to the Youngstown — I think it is called •—



 9    Sheet and Pipe Company.  (Indicating)



10             MR. HENRI:  So what?



11             MR. DIBDAHL:  So, the point that I want to make



12    is:  These discharges are considerably warmer than the



13    powerplant  in this particular area, and I wanted to bring



14    it to the attention of the conferees possibly for future



15    investigation,



16             If there is one of the conferees that might know,



17    I would like to know who this outfall belongs to — this



1&    particular one in this location (indicating), at this point



19    here,  I am sorry this isn't brighter,
   i


20             MR. MILLER:  Well, I have trouble with your map.



21 j   I am from Indiana, and this is where it would be located,



      but the map is not an accurate pictorial representation of



 3    the shoreline, which is part of the problem,



 ^             But there are two discharges this side of


25
      Youngstown Sheet and Tube which we have known and have been

-------
 I                            A* Dybdahl


 2   reported to the conference, which are American Oil and Union


 3   Carbide.


 ^             MR. DYBDAHL:  One belongs to Union Carbide, you


 5   are saying?


 6             MR. MILLER:  Well, I can't tell from your map.


 7             MR. DYBDAHL:  I have the maps here if you wish to


 g   see them.


 9             MR. MAYO:  That can be identified, and I think for


10   purposes of the discussion it may not be worth pursuing that


11   particular point at this time.


12             As I get your commentary, Mr. Dybdahl, what you


13   were seeking to demonstrate by using this specific piece of


14   imagery was that there exist in the area thermal discharges


15   which exceed that of the Stateline plant.


16             MR. DYBDAHL:  Exactly.  And the fact that they do


17   intersect each other or overlap each other.


IS             One other point I would like to make:  It has been


19   identified to me that at this particular location is a water


20   filtration plant (indicating) possibly for the city of


21   Chicago, and it is sitting within the thermal plume dis-


22   persion  zone.   So, depending on where their intakes are,


*3   they could be taking  in warmer water than lake ambient.


2/f             MR. MCDONALD:  Mr. Dybdahl, how far does the dark

pc
  '   area extend  from shoreline  in terms of heat?

-------
     	532




                              A. Dybdahl



               MR. DYBDAHL:  This respective distance here would t



 •2    approximately 1,200 to 1,400 feet from shore, on an average,



 •              MR. MILLER:  What were the wind directions when




      these were taken?



               MR. DYBDAHL:  The wind directions from the north



      at  10 knots was the information that was given to me.



               MR. MILLER:  This can account for the dark picture



 9    because  the American Maize and Union Carbide are in a cove



10    that is  protected on both sides, and we have known that they



11    overlap  for a long time,



12             MR. MAYO:  Are there any questions, gentlemen?




13             Mr. Purdy.



14             MR. PURDY:  Yes.  Of this particular map or the



15    report?



16             MRe MAYO:  The report of Mr. Dybdahl.



17             MR. PURDY:  Okay.  What do you mean by "ground



IB    truth"?



19             MR. DYBDAHL:  What I mean by "ground truth" is



20    respective surface temperatures of the water in the par-



21    ticular  target area that we were working in.



22             MR. PURDY:  At the time the picture was taken?



23             MR. DYBDAHL:  At the time of flight, yes.  This




24    Was coordinated with the U.S. Coast Guard,  and EPA, Region




25    v — U.S., EPA Enforcement Branch.

-------
                                                              533
 1
 2
17
19
20
21
22
23
25
                         A.  Dybdahl


          MR.  PURDY:   I recognize that you have mentioned
 o j|  the  error  in the identification of the B» C. Cobb plant and


   |j
 i  i  the  S. T»  Warren Company in Muskegon Lake, but as those con-
 " i •
   i'


 5 ji  elusions relate to the discharge of S. T. Warren Company,



 n   could you  tell me where the "ground truth" was taken?



 7              MR. DYBDAHL:  -The "ground truth" on those respec-



     tive points was given to me by Mr. Howard Zar, and how he



     obtained it I am not really certain.  Let me pass that to
   ', i


^3   him  at this time.



11              MR. ZAR:  We obtained "ground truth" of that area



12 j!  from Consumers Power Company — the supply and intake dis-
   11


1'; '  charge, temperature and flow from their plants along the



14 
-------
     		    534



 1                             A.  Dybdahl


 2    Cobb  plant,  but  it is felt that it is representative of the

   |i
 3  S  paper company.
   I

 4             MR. PURDY:   Is not the "ground truth" data used
   i

 5    to develop your  temperatures from the densities of the
   i
 b i   film?
   I

 7             MR. DYBDAHLj   Yes, sir, that is very true. When


 &  j  we are analyzing this particular data,  we collect the "ground
   i
 9 |   truth" from  all  around the lake area, and respective — what
   ; i

10    we determine —  calibration  curves are made up, where we take


11    the high points,  low points, and we  are able to extrapolate


12 i;  temperatures in  between. Each of these are prepared or


!3  '  checked on that  curve and in this particular case they  fell


14 i,  right on the calibration curve.  It  is an error in location.


15 ;   The B. C. Cobb plant was not recorded.
    i

               MR. PURDY:   Well,  I am confused as to how you


      could make up a  calibration  curve from data from one point
   11

1° !•  and looking  at the film at a different point.


19             MR. DYBDAHL:   This can be  done by an optical
   :i

20 i  analysis back in our laboratory in Denver.  It is something

91  •
*•*• '!  that  we carry out for each and every source.
   i
o o I
               In several cases,  I might  add at this point,
   11
   ! i
23 ''
 ^ !i  the inlet and discharge temperatures were not given in  terms
   !:
O /  >
   |!   of Lake Michigan surface waters. In other words, if the
   i!
25 i
   |   inlet was submerged,  the temperature at that point will not

-------
 3
 4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
	.	535
                         A. Dybdahl
be the same as that on the surface.  It may not be the same,
          We have ways of — by using the same system, same
aircraft, same altitude — to extrapolate data from other
points by measuring film densities optically, and in the
use of the calibration curves of finding relative surface
temperatures in a given area*  And in the cases of these
particular — one comes to mind — the inlet temperature
was 52° F.,, which was a submerged inlet.  The surface temper-
ature of Lake Michigan, at that particular point, was 60°,
so the comparison was made to the surface temperature of
Lake Michigan in that area, not to the inlet temperature of
24
 52°.
          MR, PURDY:  Yes,  As I understand, you used the
 "ground truth"  data to make  your  calibration  curve,
          MR. DYBDAHL:  Yes,  that is true,
          MR. MILLER:  Mr, Chairman,
          MR, MAYO: Mr, Miller.
           MR.  MILLER:   Where were the  ambient  temperatures
      obtained?
           MR.  DYBDAHL:   I am sorry.   Where  were the ambient
22
      temperatures what?
23              MR. MILLER:   Obtained.
                MR.  DYBDAHL:   They were obtained all  around Lake
      Michigan from Michigan City to the Wisconsin-Illinois border,

-------
               	     536




                              A. Dybdahl



 2    and from the respective power companies.  This information



 3    was provided to me by Region V, EPA.



 4             MR. MILLER:  Does the plus and minus 1 apply to



 5    all these figures on Table 2?



 6             MR. DIBDAHL:  Yes, and plus or minus 1 is limited



 7    to  my particular accuracies and not to the accuracies of the



 8    temperature-measuring devices which would be thermistor or



 9    thermometer or whatever.



10             MR. MILLER:  You are really saying, like Mitchell



11    plant,  that this could be 3 as well as 4, as you have in your



12    table.



13             MR. DYBDAHL:  I gave you the value of 4°.



14             MR. MILLER:  Yes.



15             MR. DYBDAHL:  It could be from 3 to 5, yes.



16             MR. MILLER:  You don't have ambient air tempera-



17    tures in the southern part where you talked about the two



1&    discharges that were much higher than the discharges from



19    Stateline.



20             MR. DYBDAHL:  If memory serves me correctly, I



21    have the air temperature at the Bailly Plant and at the



22    Mitchell plant, which was 64° F. in the afternoon of



2^    September 14, 1972.  We had wind velocities and air temper-


24
 ^    atures.



2^             MR. MILLER:  Part of my problem, then, is coming

-------
 6
 7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
                       _____ _ ____ 537.
                             A.  Dybdahl
     back  to  development of how you would obtain the ambient water
     temperature.
              MR.  DYBDAHL:  Well, I have surface temperatures
     that  were taken for me from  a boat or from the end of a
     pier
         ,
              MR. MILLER:   In this area as well?
              MR. DYBDAHL:  Yes,  at the time of flight.
              MR. MILLER:   My real problem in this area, which
     is not depicted very well upon the material shown, is that
     if you had  a north shore north wind, you have a piling up
     of the water in this area,  and you are in a shallow  cove,
     and this could  make considerable  difference in what  you  show
     in this particular region.
              MR. DYBDAHL:  That  is exactly right and that can
     be seen in  the  film.
              At 3,000 feet, I  would  have the capability of
     recording on the ground or  on the water, if you will, a
     track 10,&00 feet wide, so  I  am able to get well beyond
     that in the ambient waters  of Lake Michigan.  What you just
     said can easily be seen on  the  film, yes.
              MR. MAYO: Any other  comments or  questions?
              MR.  SCHRAUFNAGEL:  Yes.  Schraufnagel  from Wisconsir
              We have a problem here  in orienting ourselves  also
25
     on some of  the  locations in addition to the one  in Michigan.

-------
   .	^_______^^_	533
   ii


 1                            A. Dybdahl


 2    The  so-called powerplant installation at Port Washington


 3    doesn't  square with anything that we know of as far as the


 4    powerplant installation is concerned.


 5             Also,  the Pulliam powerplant — it is in the pic-


 6    ture, but it doesn't show as a thermal plume from the Pulliam


 7    plant.   A thermal plume is shown from a lagoon discharge


 $    about a  half a mile or a mile away.


 9             We have done a certain amount of thermal imagery


10    ourselves and generally I agree that your report — the data


11    was  available fairly rapidly, and it doesn't — a number of


12    these instances  do not seem to reflect the conditions that


13    we find.


14             We have examined — the two installations are in


15    error, the Pulliam plant and —


16             MR. MAIO:  Which page are you referring to?  Are
   i

17    you  referring1 to a particular page in the report?


               MR. SGHRAUFNAGEL:  On page 4, that installation


19 ||   cannot be the Port Washington powerplant.  And on page 10,


      the  Pulliam powerplant is located perhaps — it is on the


21 [   opposite side of the stream, practically on Green Bay, and


      it is not where  the thermal plume is shown in the picture.


               MR. DIBDAHL:  I would like to comment on this,


      Mr.  Chairman, if I may.


               In the case of the latter, this thermal discharge

-------
   	539_



 1                            A. Dybdahl


 2   shown in Figure 5 is not that of a powerplant;  it is the


 3   only one I found on the Fox River when I was asked to fly


 4   that area.  It is not reported as a powerplant; it is merely


 5   a thermal discharge that was seen at the time of flight.


 6             MR. SCHRAUFNAGEL:  The thermal plume shown is


 7   actually in a boat slip.


 3             MR. DYBDAHL:  That is fine, but it is definitely


 9   there.


10             And in your first question, as identified to me,


11   that was indeed the Port Washington powerplant, and based on


12   the information that was given to me.  As you can see, I did


13   not report a surface discharge in that area.  That particular


14   picture represents an optical transect of the film in this


15   particular area.  We did that because we could not find a


16   definite thermal discharge at the surface.


17             This particular infrared light scanner can only


     see surface waters; it cannot penetrate.  The maximum depth


     that it can see into the water is 0.01 of a centimeter.


     Freshwater and salt water signatures make no difference upon


     the indication of what we see.  So if there is not a thermal


     plume on the surface, I cannot see it with the system nor

 2*3
  J   any other airborne system can see it,


  ^             MR. BLASER:  Mr. Chairman, I have a question,


 25             MR. MAYO:  Yes.

-------
   	540

 1                             A.  Dybdahl
 2             MR. BLASER:   Will  we be getting copies of the
 3   photographs,  completely scaled, so that we can make our
 4   measurements?
 5             Illinois did not agree to the definition of the
 6   plume.   Illinois  allows an irregular surface area up to the
 7   equivalent  radius of 1,000 square feet.  So we are going to
 #   have to  scale it  ourselves and find out if this is a viola-
 9   tion of  Illinois  or not.
10             MR. DYBDAHL:  Yes.  In the formal report that
11   I  have asked the  record be held open for, actual print of
12   the imagery we  saw here will be included, captioned, and
13   scaled.
14             MR. BRYSON:   Will  these be actual photographs or
15   will they be renditions of the photographs?
16             MR. DYBDAHL:  No,  they will be prints.
17             MR. BRYSON:   They  will be the actual photographs?
IS             MR. DYBDAHL:  The  actual photographs.
19             MR. MAYO:  Any other questions, gentlemen?
20             Thank you, Mr. Dybdahl.
21             MR. BRYSON:   The next Federal presentation will be
22   by Mr. Yates Barber from the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries
23   and Wildlife.
2k
25
                                           *U.S.Government Printing Office: 1974 — 751-197

-------